Loading...
Agenda 02/10/2009 Item #10A Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10. 2009 Page 1 of 191 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Request that the Board of County Commissioners adopts the "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study" (Study) dated December 2008 and directs staff to bring back an Ordinance amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for the incorporation by reference of the Study. Also, tbat tbe BCC reviews the fiscal analysis and additional data requested during the January 13, 2009 regular meeting agenda Item 10-C and directs staff to adopt the appropriate impact fee rate schedule and payment schedule. OBJECTIVE: Request that the Board of County Commissioners accepts the Study dated December 2008 and directs staff to bring back an Ordinance amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances providing for the incorporation by reference of the Study. Also, that the BCC reviews the fiscal impact and additional data and directs staff to adopt the appropriate rates and payment schedule. CONSIDERATIONS: Since 1985, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth-related capital improvements related to Transportation Facilities. On April 25, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006-19 thereby amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Code, and establishing the County's then current Road Impact Fee rates. Further, on June 26, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2007-57 incorporating the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" through which Road Impact Fees were indexed in accordance with the prescribed methodology, thereby establishing the rates that are currently in effect. Pursuant to Section 74-502 of the Code which states that impact fee studies should be reviewed "at least every three years", the County retained Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. (the Consultant) to review the existing Road Impact Fees and recommend changes to the fees where appropriate. The Consultant has also completed an updated "Trip Length" study which considered recent sampling, prior local studies and additional data throughout the state. Collier County's updated recommended residential trip lengths are consistent with the average residential trip lengths within the state. The attached studies represent an actual review of the current local costs/impacts and describe the technical and legal framework and methodology used to complete this update. On January 13, 2009, the BCC directed staff to provide a fiscal impact analysis and review the following items: . Five year (Capital Improvement Element) CIE financial feasibility, revenue projections and needs assessment. The currently proposed CIE attached as (Exhibit "A" Proposed CIE) represents a significant reduction in anticipated impact fee revenues from the recently adopted AUIR attached as (Attachment "D" adopted AUIR). It represents a five year revenue reduction of 23 million Agenda Item No.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 2 of 191 dollars and a fiscal 09 reduction from an anticipated 35 million dollars to 25 million dollars. Several projects are proposed to be adjusted accordingly to match the anticipated demand and fiscal rebalancing. Notably, Golden Gate Boulevard has been moved to 2013 from 2012, Davis Boulevard has been moved to 2010 from 2009, Collier Boulevard has been moved to 2010 from 2009. The proposed ClE is consistent with the AUIR and prior BCC approval of a 50 million dollar commercial paper loan as a revenue source. A further reduction in revenues and any corresponding changes to the schedule of capital projects within the CIE may require a re- submittal of the CIE to the Department ofCommrmity Affairs (DCA) for approval. The proposed CIE represents a review of the most recent revenue projections and construction estimates. Based on historical 2008 building activity, the CIE can be supported by the Impact Fee Study with or without the adoption of the Trip Length Study. A rollback to the 2006 rate schedule as proposed by the Productivity Committee would require approximately 5-6 million dollars annually of supplemental revenue to maintain the integrity of the CIE. . What would be the fiscal impact to the general fund revenues and subsequently the taxpayers to supplement the ClE if the BCC should adopt an alternative impact fee rate as proposed by the Productivity Committee? Approximately 5-6 million dollars annually would be required from the General Fund to balance the CIE. Based upon the projected decrease in taxable value going forward into FY 10 (-13.9%), the incremental millage rate necessary to generate $1,000,000 in property tax revenue is .0148 or $1.48 per $100,000 of taxable value. The projected county-wide taxable value for FY 10 based upon a 13.9% decrease is $67,775,060,418. To generate 6 million dollars annually, it would require .0888 mills and would impact the following land values accordingly; Single family home with a taxable value of $400,000 would see an increase of approximately $35 annually, 100,000 SF of retail would see an increase of approximately $1,000 annually and a property such as the Collier Regional Health Center would see an increase of approximately $6,500 annually. . What is the status of the un-built residential units and commercial square footage that has paid the required 50% initial impact fee and what would be the fiscal impact associated with a potential change to the payment schedule? As of 1/16/2009, there are approximately 6,434 residential units and 964,011 square feet of commercial development which has paid 50% of their road impact fees. The remaining balance due is approximately $61,288,772. Out of that total, 1,229 residential units and 340,554 square feet of commercial has expired and is in jeopardy of losing their vested status. That represents approximately $14,835,689 that is past due. The remaining balance 5,205 residentail rmits and 623,457 square feet of commercial are due through 12/31/2011. The County CIE is prepared with a five year horizon. Adjusting the payment schedule of the road impact fees to be evenly spaced with a five year schedule would maintain the integrity of the program but may require accessing the commercial paper early to meet the schedule or would require the rebalancing of the program to be more back ended to meet the revenues. It should be noted that several of the developers have stated that they may not be able to meet the second 50% payment even if it means losing their vesting. Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 3 of 191 . Conduct a review of our impact fees and collection processes with the development community and discuss their concerns and solicit ideas. Staff contacted several of the representing attorneys, planning fnms and developers. Staff also attended a Leadership Collier workshop and discussed growth management and impact fees. While the consensus was that the County should continue to look for alternative funding sources, they all expressed that shifting the payment schedule from 50% down and 50% within three years to five equal 20% percent payments would be a significant benefit to their fiscal planning model. Full payment would still be required at building permit but a longer payment plan that would maintain their vested status and improve their cash flow would be extremely beneficial. Some form of surety would be needed within a one year rolling period to maintain financial stability if we are to extend the payment process. . A review of the concept of deferring impact fees to building permit in areas that have adequate capacity. Allowing developers to secure vesting along a roadway that has adequate capacity without paying impact fees at all until building permit has several complications that make this problematic. The current GMP review requirement has a significance test of 2% on the first adjacent link before carrying the impact on the next link. In the urban area this would allow small projects to proceed but would inhibit medium to large projects. The level of available capacity would also be a point of contention. This would encourage established residential builders to vest large platted subdivisions way in advance of their anticipated demand in order to secure the capacity. Additionally, it would complicate the fiscal management of impact fees. While the concept is possible, the variables would require a much more detailed analysis and vetting with the development community and the BCC before it could become effective. Exceptionally high vacancy rates continue to exacerbate the perception that roadway capacity is available and that capital construction can be delayed or is not needed. It should be noted that impact fee rate adjustments that differ from the December 2008 Study may have a negative revenue impact; and, therefore, a corresponding detrimental impact to the County's Capital Improvement Element (CIE). Failure to maintain funding for capacity improvements will eventually revert to a back log environment experienced in the late 1990s. Attached is the I'"ate comparison sheet that provides the detailed comparison by category for the current rate, the proposed rate with the Trip Length Study, the proposed rate without the Trip Length Study and the 2006 Rate recommended by the Productivity Committee. PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Productivity Committee recommended that the Study be adopted but the new rates not be implemented for a period of two (2) years and that Road Impact Fees be rolled back to the rates effective June 30, 2006. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: As indicated by the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan, the new proposed impact fee study rates are designed to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. The application of the rate revisions and indexing is also consistent with Objective 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 4 of 191 Management Plan which states: "Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth." The proposed impact fee rates ensure that Road Impact Fee assessments consistently reflect a pro rata share of the costs of growth-necessitated capital improvements. Lower than anticipated impact fee revenues may impact the financial feasibility of the CIE. FISCAL IMPACT: Based upon collections of Road Impact Fees from historical commercial and residential permitting activity, current permitting activity and forecasts, the change in Road Impact Fee revenue associated with the proposed Study, with or without the Trip Length Study, would be sufficient to fund the proposed 5 year CIE. A decision to roll back to the June 2006 rate schedule is estimated to reduce revenues by an additional 5-6 million dollars annually and would require supplemental funding to maintain the projects in the proposed CIE. Extending the payment plan for impact fees to five (5) annual equal payments would maintain the integrity of the CIE but may require a rebalancing of the schedule. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The County Attorney will work with staff to implement Board direction on this item. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners directs staff to bring back an Ordinance amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for the incorporation by reference of the Impact Fee Study entitled "Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study" dated December 2008 and implement the corresponding Road Impact Fee Rate Schedule or an alternative rate as approved by the BCC. Also, that the BCC adjusts the payment schedule for transportation road impact fees to five (5) equal annual payments with surety in place for a minimum of one (1) year in advance of the next anticipated payment and applies this change to all developments, no matter what stage of the payment process they are currently in, with the understanding that full payment will still be made at building permit. Prepared By: Nick Casalanguida, Director, Transportation Planning Attachments: 1) Tindale-Oliver Road Impact Fee Study; 2) Trip Length Study; 3) Comparison Rate Chart (Existing Rates-2008 Study Rates-2008 Study Rates without Trip Length Study-June 30,2006 Rates); 4) Attachment "D" Adopted AUIR; 5) Exhibit "A" Proposed CIE Item Number: Item Summary: Meeting Date: Page 1 of2 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 5 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10A Request that the Board of County Commissioners adopts the Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study (Study) dated December 2008 and directs staff to bring back an Ordinance amending Schedule One of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for the incorporation by reference of the Study_ Also, that the BCC reviews the fiscal analysIs and additional data requested during the January 13, 2009 regular meeting agenda Item 10- C and directs staff to adopt the appropriate impact fee rate schedule and payment schedule. (Norman Feder, Transportation Services Administrator) 2/10/2009 90000 AM Approved By Norm E. Feder, Ale? Transportation Services Transportation Division Administrator Date Transportation Services Admin. 1127/20091 :12 PM Approved By Date Jeff Klatzkow County Attorney Assistant County Attorney County Attorney Office 1127/20094:54 PM Approved By Amy Patterson Community Development & Environmental Services Impact Fee Manager Date Financial Admin. & Housing 1/27/20099:11 PM Approved By Paula Fleishman Community Development & Environmental Services Date Impact Fee Analyst Financial Admin. & Housing 1/28/2009 7 :56 AM Approved By Brian Hancock Transportation Division Operations Support Manager Transportation Administration Date Approved B)' 1/28/20098:04 AM Pat Lehnhard Transportation Services Executive Secretary Transportation Services Admin Date 1/28/20098:28 AM Approved By OMS Coordinator County Manager's Office OMS Coordinator Office of Management & Budget Date 1/28/200910:58 AM Date Approved By Nick Casalanguida Transportation Services MPO Director Transportation Planning 2/2/20098:32 AM Approved By Mark Isackson County Manager's Office Budget Analyst Office of Management & Budget Date 2/2/200912:35 PM Approved By file://C :\AgendaT est\Export\ 123 -F ebruary%20 1 0,%202009\ 1 O. %20COUNTY%20MANAGE... 2/4/2009 Page 20f2 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 6 of 191 Susan Usher Senior ManagemenUBudget Analyst Office of Management & Budget Date County Manager's Office 212/2009 4:06 PM Approved OJ James V. Mudd Board of County Commissioners County Manager Date County Manager's Office 2/2/20095:32 PM file://C:\AgendaTest\Export\] 23-February%20 I 0,%202009\ I 0.%20COUNTY%20MANAGE... 2/4/2009 <{O>~ 000> "'o~ N_ .0 "'r- E >- OJ OJ~O> ~"'''' -::;CL "'~ -0.0 ~ " iijL.L OJ <{ z Q ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ; w ~ . . ! ~- .- ~o . ~~ .u~ :"~cn .~~ 5~~ ~~ ~~ ~ o u ~ ~ o u ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ . t ~ ~ , ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ w 88UUU . ;!U~~~~U 5 ....M_ ......Non'" ~ ett.... a:::t~ ~ ~~ ~g~I~~~~ggggg8ggg ~~ 88 ~~~~~~~~~ 1N ~~ a~ =a ~i~ ~ aaag ~8~ gSl!!SI oUOOg88888888 z ~ 0 0 !! g 8~~8ggd;!'" il ~ ~ 8 0 _ <QlDIlO8~_~:( N ....0_..... ;~~~ ~ t w t:l ~ -~ ~ w ;; w 0 ~g U~ Sl8a ~~:;H~O 88 ~8 gg g~& ~ 0 z = ~ ~8 0 ~~~~~~~r;;. ~ ~ 0 N ~ ;i. ~ m IflO....- .....a~ t w ;;~... w ~ 00 8~gl~aj g gal:lllil~ a~U888 !!l! ~ ~ z - 8 8 8 8 l!~wci~n" . il ~ m w .....~g.., ~ ~ ~ n ~ - Zl.;:-:;;;~'-~~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 851 g~ga ~~I~~~PH~o ig8ggg~ U ~ 0 z gO ~ ~ ~~ g ""'~"'OOg S~ ~ -8 ~ w :;;. ::J~~ 0 ~!l ~ N oe ;l~""'-~;;; ~t:; I ~ -~ ~ ~- ~ llngUa8 g g a 81s!aj~ a gUU!!. n ~ z ~ ~~~n 8 ge 0 :=?$~g;;i ~.~ f;.'lg 0 il i! g ~ Olo_<CIallQ .............N W N _ ,.,......-..:..f') ~g I t a ~~ ~~ ~ w w n ~ ~ Ii ~ IS (5 z ~R n<:; "" o ::Co ..... U .- U ~- ~ N;2...""S!5~", Ul * D~~~~-~~U~~~u~~~5~~ gg~ogt~~~gg;:g~gg~g~ i ~ ~ I '" ~ III Q:I .~ G 0 -... Q S~-I!~"'~ g ~~ ~g Clm~$~ .~ Uj ~ ~~i~~ ~h2~ d ~B 0 ~ ~~~~~8~~ Eo ~...~~~~ & m ~ a ~5~~...b~~~ 58~ ~m. ~ ~ ~ a:g~.91!10alW.99.9 -ei~~64G1: ~:li Ii: d~~~~~S~~~~ ~~~~,~~i8~~ ~ 4~ ~; 8~~ Ii m~~ ~ 'g.~~1i'f0 ~ ~ ! is .r "1~lb: ~~~i~~~t~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~i~!~I~~ ';II: c!l! ,~.f;: 1;Il.'~~::tJ~"O, ~liO(rIl~ ~~~_~1;I~~5!~11~' J.~ ~~ S~~M ~~m~~am~~~=~ ~ii~&~ ~g~j~~j !5~"OS~.~i~~o ~~"O~-i ; i~~~. _k&ke~~ Q~~ ~ Ce~! ~~ ~ 8~u~~uu6 l.'~~~~~~~~~ 8~~_ 0 .eo;o:g~:g(R::J: !!!oS!.........8~;gg <,>~usgg~co:8op o~oq;,..."'....<('J ;!:g~S!c;~LI>~cg ggg$:z:g~*~~ M _ "0' ,j\~iii g g 8 8. !l ~ ~i>- 1: ~ ~ '" N ~ 8 Ji N :i ;0; ~ g U ' ~PBg > N ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ .!l! B H~l ! 0 ~j I ~j I 0 E . ~ "'. ~"' III ~ QI- ~~' ':5 ",.<::tD &'~~15& !~ i ~ aRj r" .!Glt€ii,. NB 5 ~~Fi~~ l"~ _ c ~= u ,. !~~H 11" .~g~ ~~ ~ 1i.g ]~~ lie!l~~ :=Ii 1\:0 c h'" ~:02 ii >-.B.._B 15~ E ~I.~~ ~..", ." ~ ~2~~J ~1 g ~c2 ~f~~; ':,2'!.11I i~;~i "~ p~ j~~-g ! .g "'" ""'::: i 11.!;;;:J,. ri~ c.~!~ e ~~15 o Z'l:'t.> .~. :t>l~I'1J,! ~E. .!~~~E ~i~ ~'l5';li;i S"'n41" 'l~ ~sP ~ a.~ !!'jEiii *'~1l II :;]ij E wa..E wE-lii'l! b~a 1-:- e 0_ i ~ Z,j;:;~ zf.;<II...._ ~ 0 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1i t ;0; Ii Ji~ g ;; w ;; 5::' i.e 8 ~1t 8 & 8 .E " ';u ~ ~ 8. :;i ~ ~~ .. .. ~ ~ 0 N ~~ ~- .. ~ g !5~ N n '" g ~ ~ . ~ !)! " ~e N &w ii~ ". 8 8 ~ h .5:fiie! ;; ~ ~ ~ ~t. 0 N O. ~ $<:;:g > ~ ~ ~ {l-;~ 5' i 8. & 8 ~1! w .~ 0 g ~ii ~ ~ ~. 2 . .n ~ t ~ t~ ~~i oh ~.! .~~ ~ i':~ ,~15 ~ -ll,@ ~:'l" ~~~ ~ < . It< ~ 0 1l~ · M W i~~ en.... . " ~il -~ ~ < . ;; Ii h . ~~ ~> .al'; '" . . ~li.~ ~ ~ Ifl-. i~ ..1!il.. ~~ W"jll ~Lj ~~ ,H O. Z . ~ ~ w " , " . . 1 . o ! . I . 1 . 1 i 8 o 8 , ! , , j 1 o ~ ~ i w , i ~ " , , ! . , " ;i; ., ; ~ , u ! ~ ~ ~ , , , j . " , S ~ ~ ~ u , ! r~ ~ , . t ! o .Attactwn1!ll'l'l"D~ AlM Upcbte 2001I1 Year work PI'ognMICIE Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 1 -. __In_"" P~n~ R nf 1 Project Project . H.... FYOI FYlO FY" FYt2 FY" SUMMMY OF PROJ!CTS -.... _unt ......... "5 F_ (PAR.GSPKWY) 1 Iloldon GIlo Pkwy "-, . ImlnDklll.. RdICoIiet BI'Id ~ - ImInDWM Ad 175 .CoIIer Btvd. - 110180 Rlthsnau Pony 10 CoII_ Blvd -" seB Ph I CRlPb I ROW' 110OO1 s.ns. a....,.. BtYdIPofIy 1,581 R 1.... "'''51 VWlderblft BcII RdfAirpon-CoIllw BMI, .5"'" CaIII.,.I!NvdJlIllA1kRd.QGiIltvd, 0 ,.."42 nraau... RdNS41..J78 - 110OO11 Cd...,. Blvd fUS 41 aD gavtl} Subrotai 1,506 1.... 110OO1. CoJII... Blvd (Owls tD N of GG MaJII c.n.1) 10,013 c" U,II7 CJl 23,8OIl "'73 0lhII. 8ouIn<<d . Colli..- - RMlo .21,100 c" 21.100 60101 County............,..,...".... 7113 R 7D3 ::.:- VMCMrbltl a.c:h RdICoIr... .wd-WIlson ,,Dt'1 R 10,724 R ..... R ..... R ".... R .30,721 GoIdeIt QIttIi 8hldlWll1IOft E to o..ato ..... R 1tt,150 R ',oeo R 311,100 c" 154,170 == CoI....11tvd (GG8 to GrMn) ..... ',715 R ....... 'CJl U.I15 Cdler Btvd (N QG Canal . GtMn) ..... R 21_ DICJI ...... """"" -,.... ".0. R ,_ eoooo 111~cr-.~ .0116 DaYts Blvd UghUng ,.".. Hol'1tllW'ooU WIcIti"~ewood Ext. ..... CNR ..... 1l2Oll' SBB-c-CII,U -.,toGrMn ..... R 1.,'10 c" ...... 01 w.lI (lnttnk + 1,' rntJe.. Camp K". + 1.' """" -I 2A,820 C 2UlO CJl ...... """" 01 w.tI Ct.." '11' .Eo.~) lIOO2O WII.on Btvd IQOB ~ ImII'Ik Rd) 1,Doo D ..... R 2,000 R 12.... lIOO2' 0___ __ ConolnodI.. 0 -- 11.173 UJ78 ..... >.... .... 21."2 SlJbrot;l1 86626 615931 11100 19314 60,800 303'41 T.... I.. , " 11100 TO .. .,141 ~~IWn. - --- ..... ..... ..... ..... ','" ...... - Major InIMMc:tIon 1mprovIi...... 1.... I.... 1.... ,.... ,_ ..... 8001. InterMction ~11l'\PfOV. 780 1,710 1,710 1,750 1,7. 7,1151I 1lO172 New TndIc stg..... 7110 '50 7.. ,.. 'oc 3,T5G . ShoUIderSIIfetJ Prugnm oc 50 50 50 oc ... TrafIIc e.m.1I9Stud_ ... ... zoo zoo 2!0 '.... I PIIthwayllfSkhwllb Blkt Lan.. !GO !GO !GO ... ... ..... '0 Trand Facility & rraMfw... - 6'010 r........ Entwnc.Ml...... 1,780 I.... 1.... '.'" 1.... ..... MaJor RoM.., ..173 ~U~~..b1.letioll .;.. THO RoM "-furb..hing 101 ... ... ... ... S~ OpentIone ,,- ""'" '0_ 51'" I~rooralll. 7111 11 t50 .'Ill" Cdec1Dr JioIcMlMmor ""'1' FlOMI 1,102 1,135 ,.... ..... 1,e. l,iG 80171 _ROW ..... 1,7" '.... I.... ','" ..... r"''''M to other fundi: 3,104 .- ..... ..- ..... ...... 1mpM:t F.. AItunds .02 1.000 1,000 1,'" ..... ..... Debt Service Pymte. COfRIIW'CiaI p.p. Ui~74 8,100 ~~ 10,_ ii Dtbt s.mc. p~ 13 174 11.74 " . .. . .. TD'bII FYndklg R.qUMt AI Funes. 117'011 " Of , 1 ... -... Qpad F...cClrA. Revenue ...... 30,00G ...... ...... ...... 170,100 - GllsTp~u" 17.N5 21.172 22..811 11,179 2.(,057 104,_ - o.."talRelmburwemerlm 9,184 2,211 Z,Otll I_ ..... ....., Short Term LOll. ComIDefciaJ p.... 22,170 ..... "'32 OC,OOO T_ o c.nyFotWiIrd :14,502 M,I52 Stomlto'ld8l Funding fw ~ a.n..IIIFllnd 2.1.... "',GOO ...... ...... "'.... 111,lIOt G.nwaI Fllltd rum llrIIeIl - ~"" /3;" ~"'rv. TotalS v.... Revenua 117012 "840 71 G71 I ... ... GI"OM SurptuW8hortfal - 23.... ( ) - ~ Cum...... -- S .. BUd, D . o..Ign M - liUlI:gdon C - Ov..Ao ..cUon 23,'" ............. R-ROW LS"",- 1.- AU.~M.'-",_4 lP- SIB LoIln "'-PQ'ment 10 hte Producdc:lR RMdy May .1kWr1or1itttlng.. FY2011 Sch.oukl hu _n MI)UMlId baNd on need and ftftllnCtng DepHdIng on aetuIII coda forOl'''' ~d, Contingency In FYot"ltlOU\d be ...... for proJectIi IllIclucllng: .PlNRkIlIIo......Ul.,~~.__.,..."..IIOW,$3OUCIe~ . v.................. IllrpoootlllMlll..,.........,... -4.......~ .PMontI.~~fDo".....-~....."'*'_......-.. 18 t.at lIpd.-d: 111 ~ Upcl8liMlfor"~ 01 UIMbIb' Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 9 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY SINGLE FAMILY TRIP CHARACTERISTICS STUDIES FINAL REPORT May 23, 2008 Prepared by: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 N Ashley Dr.. #100 Tampa, Florida, 33602 ph (813) 224-8862Jax (813) 226-2106 Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10. 2009 Page 10 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY SINGLE FAMILY TRIP CHARACTERISTICS STUDIES Collier County is in thc proccss of updating its transportation impact fee. As palt of this update, a trip characteristics study for the single family land use was conducted. This summary report, which acts as a technical support document to the 2008 update of the transportation impact fee program, presents the results of the trip data collected for the single family land use in the Collier County. This data collection effort was conducted to reflect current travel demand for the single family residential land use based on development patterns in the Collier County and supplements previous data collected for this land use in 1999. Included in this document is a summary of the ttip characteristics study results, as well as the necessary support material utilized in the development of the summary statistics. Appendix A presents the raw data results collected by tbe origin- destination surveys and Appendix 8 presents the recommended single family land use demand component input variables. Methodology Trip characteristics are inputs to the demand component of the Transportation Impact Fee. The demand for travel placed on the transportation system is usually expressed in units of vehicle miles or lane miles of roadway capacity consumed. In particular, the three variables needed to obtain the measure of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in Collier COWlly for all land uses shown in the final transportation impact fee schedule are: . Number of dally trips generated, or the tlip rate; . Length of those trips; and . Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is estimated to have already been on the road system, referred to as percent new trips. The analysis of trip characteristics data is based on the review of the lane miles of capacity consumed by specific types of land use. In order to better understand trip characteristics in Collier County, a total of 4 single family residential sites were studied. The details of these site surveys can be found in Appendix A. Two types of study data were collected at each study site: 1) trip generation data, and 2) origin-destination survey data. The trip generation data were collected through the use of machine traffic counts during specific weekdays for a period of 72 consecutive hours, or three days. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 11 of 191 Additionally, manual counts were collected periodically during the week to verify the accuracy of the machine traffic counts. Origin-destination survey data also was collected at each study site. The data was collected through road-side patron interviews. The interviews were generally conducted between the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., which allowed for data to be collectcd for both work and non-work type trips. A statistical review of the reasonableness of the survey data was perfonned. This analysis is illustrated in Appendix A, Table A-5. Finally, the results of the trip characteristics surveys are summarized through three tables (Appendix A, Tables A-6 through A-8). These tables provide information about the trip generation rate, percent new trips, and trip lengths for each of the four sites previously referenced. Data resulting from the trip characteristics surveys will be used in the development of the demand component of the transportation impact fee for the single family residential land use. One of the considerations in the collection of origin-destination survey data is to collect survey samples to develop a reasonable level of confidence that the collected data reflects local travel conditions in Collier County. From a statistical sampling respective, the goal of these studies is to collect enough survey samples to be 90 percent confident that the average trip length from the survey data was within a plus or minus 15 percent accuracy level for each study site. This confidence level and level of accuracy standard is currently required in the Collier County Administrative Manual (Appendix B) for independent studies conducted as part of an alternative fee calculation for transportation impact fees. Appendix A, Table A-5 presents the review of the land use sample size for each of the sites surveyed at the single family residential land use. This table indicates the number of samples, coefficient of variation, and sample size requirement at a 90 percent level of confidence. Margins of error for each of these sample size requirements are provided at 10 and 15 percent. Review of the data presented in Table A-5 indicates that enough samples were obtained at all 4 of the study sites for the single family residential land use to obtain a confidence level at or above 90 percent confidence within both a 10 and 15 percent margin of error. In summary, the results of the local trip characteristics studies conducted in Collier County have provided reasonable data and the results meet the statistical sampling requirements. Thus, the data collected will be used in the development of the demand component for the single family residential land use for which data were collected in Collier County. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 2 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 12 of 191 Table 1 provides a summary of the data collected for the three variables (trip generation rate, trip length, and percent new trips) and the resulting vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for each site that was studied. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 3 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study <1:0)~ 000) rO~ " N........ _ 0 "00 ~- E >.~ >, 2mrn ~ q - " '" :l "'~CL Vi -0.0 tl .~ 0 ~ Cll OS " '" C') '" C') U ~ iijLL Q..Q.l: V) '" V) 00 ~ .g OJ S"'" '" N '" N .~ <1: V) '" N ~ .... "0 'C U 0.> 13 " '" -" ~ r- oo C') V) u f-< ~ 0 ... - '<: " :;:; iJ '" '" V) u C') 0 '" '" ~ > a. - 2 0.> 'C ~ ..s f-< 0.> - ~ lL ..". " Vl = ~: '-'l'I.l ?f :S: :S: :S: " Q,l: 0 0 0 C E ... " .~o 0 0 0 " " z ,,0 0 0 0 ~ a. " ,... - - ~ 0 ~..' a. " '5 ~ 0.> <:; " -0 -= oc '" ~ 0.> -0 I/) "". V) V) C " ,~ ..... c: '" "! V) .;; " 0.> ,~ " 0 ~ ,... =. C') - '" -" " "C " - u " .9 :I .. " 0.> .~ " a. - ~ C/) = " .B ~ ..,g -0 " I/) ~ - ~ >, -0 U .~ = " "'! V) oc r- u ..c -0 :;:; .-"J. ......~ '" r- OO .!< " a ,.... " N 00 I/) .= '" '" "0 a ';: " u " .." " -" 0.> CD ;; '" E - U -0 " a. .... -0 .!< 0 ell 0.> a. " CD .... :l :l :l :l ~ ~ ell " '5 " :c -0 -0 -0 -0 or> -0 .r: " ell (,) -0 -5 -0 I- ~ " " >, 0.> C. E ..c ~ .". ';: V) 0.> :~ I- '" N r- - ~ e r- '" '" 0.> ~ C') 0 '0 ~ " " E .9 0.> ~ :l ;; 0.> ] ~ ~ ] B ~ Z " ell " 0.> E " " " " E " ..c 0) 0) " 0) "" bJ) >, E -0 -0 -0 -0 0.> '5 c .;;; .;; .;; .;;; 0) :I 0) " " " 00 ~ C/) ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ " 0.> ..s .8- 0) -0 .~ '" 1: .~ 1.0 00 r-- " 0) a., -< -< >, ~ ~ :l < 0. 2 0) u 0:: ~ u " " " .,,; c~ -= ~ 0 :0 :0 :0 0; 0) g -0 => 0) '-' " " " E '6 0.>- W:l ~ 0 2~ " 0 f-< f-< f-< - 0) [/) [/) ~ ~~~>,.a ~ .S oh -= " <<<A~ ~ ;< uo 0) u .;;: 0.> ~ ::: K >< >< "'0 'Jl ~-o " 0 -= 0) ::i ~:.a:.a ~ ::l ~ " 'u I:: 0 0 -0 "-0 is Co::: c:: c..$"O .s 0; 0 < N 0:1 OJ II,) Il) ll) ::1 ::: ~ o...o..o..uo:e '6 ~ '0 0.. 0.. 0..--<- " < " f-< <<<i3 0) ;; .~ "<l ... .~ ...; u ~ = OJ OJ ~ 0.> oS on ~ " u " u " u " - " ~ ~ f-< " OJ E .~ rn " :l :l ~ ~ :;:; a. 6 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 <5 00 N C') "" Vl Vl Vl Vl > ~ '" ~ B B B B ----- 0 '" Vi Vi Vi Vi .......NM7lrl ::s OJ N -----'-" -g >, " f= ;;;: <(O)~ 000) ~O~ N_ O .0 Z~:;! E e", 2 (Il OJ '" ~ a) '" ;>, ::l (Il " '" E .", (Il~o.. ::l - ::l ::l ::l .",..0 " '" 0 v; " t/) e'" "5b ~ U '- .", U ",LL " 0 c ~ ~ OJ .S ::l :g -0 ] Q) ..!l ~ .,g <( ~ 0 '" -'=' ~ Q) U U -0 ::l -0 'C ,s ~ '- I .", a u " ~ 0 U c ;:; B N ..!l ~ ~ Q) ~ -0 :; N ,s -'=' Q) ~ .", eo .c Q) U '" S. "5b r-; .L u ~ Q) ,," "8 '" 00 ~ .2: c - 0- p. -5 ~ 'u; " " " "" lfl :0 ." E ,s -5, "" Q) ;-. 0 '" r: Q) ,s ~ () 'R '" :.a "5b ;-. u.. () Q) Q) ~ en " .", i'J c c8 c.; ~ -5 '> " ';;) Q) " " " " Q) () '" " ~ '5 ~ u ,s ~ '" ^ p. ~ '" c -'< f- '" ..0 ~ ;:; ra u N P. 00 0 0, N 0- .;;; ::E " - B c8 '" E N '" on '" 0- Q) > :0 N .", '- ,@ E ,.-: ,.-: '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" c ~ '" ::l "iJ f- "iJ '" ::s <:> .", > "" " > c In <:> c g a) .2 N ..':l '" S " " " ':~:;':;~~:f?~'~J:_ '" 'R '> E 1:: r::: - ~ (3 ..0 Q) 0 -=:::~,~i~:-'cli'~' " '" 0 ~ ::> <ll"H''I:l''',' - '" " ~ '" p. tIl p. ~ i'!_'-QJ"~:..=i~rQ '" DO 53 2 Q .5 ~ "i: .,', ..'",-' ~~.... .". '" '" ~ "" 'C 0. C ';~:I:lJl~,;:lo(i; 0- .", a '" 00 " ra .";,,O;'=!i\'~~;'(_ ,.-: DO 00 t'- t'- ~ .;;; '" ::: Q) .'" c .g Q. i~~;;tftt<iil~,t ~ '" :0 ~ 0 .5 E ~ ] .,.,j'"'''''lll''' ::l '" .", :; .M _b ",_, .' " 6' :,'tl'i',,?<,~- -~ "'.' Vi " Q) 0 'j?::->_. .,'.:"rj"'f^:,;.t.'~ 0- :0 ~ '" '- ~ E "iJ '" '" 0 (,) > '" ,3 c:l ~ ~ '- .", " ~ I- -;; 'C en '" c N -< " ::> '" .2 ::!E N on ~ 0 00 a) ..0 Ql ~ .". '" on on "5b '" ~ 0 '" '" " :c > ;z: c ~ 0 '" " :; ;>, c .", N ..0 .", .;;; E c '" Q () ra i5 ::l b '" .", " " l- t/) S c '" :;::; '" c '" " Q Q) () " " ::l '" "" 0, '" :0 -5 r::: :0 " on 0 '" .", 0, Q) ::l Ql ,3 u.. " U ..0 " 0, 'i3 Vi .S "'C Vl ;:; ~ '" () ~ ::l ~ ~ .~ "" Vi '" tIl 0- ..9 '" .", .", ] Q Q) Ql ..s -0 " ~ '" 'C '" c::: -0 u ~ ,s .", ::> ::l '" ::> 'c G: Q) -Q) ~ u .2 () 'i3 '- U 0 ..0 ~ :; -", ,s ::l ::> G: .s '" 00 " Vi ~ " E .", 'i3 0 1:: ~ "0 ~ "" Q) 0 c8 c .s .S .c ::l 0 N M "" '" " "0 ra () ~ N 0- X. X. X. X. .", :0 -0 .", LI.. Vl " ,s ~ "0 'C U C "0 " -", q " " " " Q) '" .~ ~ " " ;:; ::> '" '" "0 " Ql " :0 :0 :0 :0 .5 ,s '" " ;-. 2 ~ .", ::l 53 lL 'i3 ;; -OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ c U Ol ::l () 0'- '- '- '- -0 " '" .", ? :0 >. 0 ~ '" ,s " "" .S r::: ~ Vi u '" " 5crf o:i r:o" o:i () oJ ;:; () ..0 ..0 '" :; 2 Q '" -5 In >. ~ " " 0 " " " " 0 ~ ~ ~ "" u .~ " .- " "3 '5 "3 ~ .", -0 '" 'i3 " U c .", .", .", '" Q) ::l -0 Q Q ~ " " " " " ..Cl () '0 ,3 ,s ~ ::> ~ " " " " ~ c () " '" ] u u '" '" 0- 0- 0- 0- ~" .~ .~ '" "" ,3 .", '" '" -0 0- 0- 0- 0- '" " (3 ~ 00 'i3 'i3 u ~ ~ ~ <( !J '" c " .", Vl ,s ~ 0 ~ 'c ~ "0 U 0 ,3 ::l 'u 0 " " " Vi 0; 0 0; 0; () () .", ,s " -0 N Vl 0; 0 ;:; u () 'c E 00 () u ::: u ~ ~ '" " '" ..9 .~ -5 u "d " '" ~ ~ ;; ~ "" 0 .", .", ::l ::l ::l ::l <( ~ p. s:: " ::> 0 ::> ::l " '" .", .8 11 "0 0 '" DO '" 'c 'C () 'R 0 '" ::> 0 en en en VJ VJ "d U Q) ,... t'- .", () 0 '" G: '" c r; ~ "" N G: ,.-..,-.....,-.....,-.....- ~ 0. ::l " :::..~c::!-~ " '5 .", .2 d " .'" .:: c " 0 on :0 9 00 " ..!l 1:: '" .", '" ..Cl <:> () 0 'c c " " <:> ..9 ~ Q. " " " on -;; N Q. ~ " '" '" 2 .", ;>, ~ E " 0 "" "" " ~ ~ " a ~ ~ <l3 '" () Q "0 APPENDIX A Collier County Trip Characteristics Study Data Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 15 of 191 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 16 of 191 Table A-1 Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 I..i/';Uz;.;i.g;i~i'/';)< ':;};'i,\-:~-::>,;i;::;: ,;,;.;..}~bO.~.~~. ;,.hi. ..i;;,..9>~,t~e~f'~),.. .frll1Type ;'ASSessabliHrlp', 'ASsessable Tn li',ii; , ".;. '(!i,C,D,S) t~~';'W::::_,TLen:gthn:i:t;~,,::'t::.: "';;';,;'ttF""i";thi!"i Pi i '("".',,!," eng" 1-1 p - 10.5 1 -2 P - 10.5 1-4 P - 2.6 1.5 P . 3.5 1-6 P - 4.3 1 -7 P - 2.6 1-8 P - 3.3 1-9 P - 2.6 1-10 P - 2 1-1 1 P - 2 1 -12 P - 0.3 1 -13 P - 3.2 1-14 P - 3.2 1-15 P - 10.5 1 -1 6 P - 0.3 1 -1 7 P - 26 1-18 P - 2.8 1-19 P - 2 1-20 P - 2.3 1-21 P 0.1 - 1-24 P - 1 0.5 1-26 P - 2.8 1-28 P - 1 .6 1-29 P - 3.6 1-30 P - 4.3 1-31 P - 10.5 1-32 P - 3.2 1-33 P - 3.7 1 -34 P - 2.6 1 -35 P - 3.5 1-36 P - 3.2 1-37 p - 3.9 1-38 P - 3.5 1 -39 P 3 - 1 -40 P - 3.8 1 -41 P - 0.2 1-43 P - 1 .7 1-45 P - 4.2 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-I Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 17 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 .. .... ...i..".. .........,; mDDund. Outb,?und T,lpType Assessable Trip .. ,6.ssessableTrip (P,C,D,S) Length . Length 1-46 p - 5.2 1-47 P - 10.5 1-52 P - 2.6 1-55 P - 4.3 1-56 P - 5 1-57 P 5.2 - 1-58 P - 3.5 1-61 P - 0.7 1-62 P 10.5 - 1-65 P - 4 1-66 P 0.6 - 1-67 P - 1.7 1-69 P - 1.5 1-70 P 2.9 - 1-71 P - 5.2 1-72 P - 2.1 1-73 P - 2.3 1-74 P - 4.6 1-75 P - 3.8 1-76 P 2.1 - 1-79 P - 1.6 1-80 P - 3.1 1-81 P - 2.3 1-82 P - 3.1 1-83 P 3.3 - 1-85 P 3.2 - 1-86 P - 3.5 1-87 P - 36 1-88 p 5.8 - 1-89 P - 1.5 1-90 P - 1.7 1-91 P - 3.9 1-92 P 2.3 - 1-93 P 1.5 - 1-100 P - 2 1-101 P 2 - 1-102 P - 2.7 1-103 P - 3.3 1-104 P 3.8 - 1-105 P 4.1 - 1-106 P - 3.6 1-107 P - 3.3 1-110 P 3.3 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-2 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 18 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 1 ~ :::':i'{':',_:"-;,,,_,..:: ;",izc,W~,p'!n~,,,,,';, .z~~~ri(i~i~#! TriPTypi; 'ASsessable.iTJ"lp... ;,p;;~'....,'- '(Pcbs)' i,0~t~~;':r!ii1'&'Tt:~[~1.%;f: "':'l~fl'L~l'.,,,.th;'!~~1.(;-,-<\: , ..;'<,'."',,'i<: , 1,'.....- 'i,',:if.:;<1.;:.e,ng :;~'::"'"f 1-112 p 1 .7 - 1-1 1 3 P - 2.3 1-1 14 P - 4 1-1 16 P - 4.2 1-1 1 7 P - 4.2 1-1 20 P 3.4 - 1-122 P - 1 .6 1-123 P 10.5 - 1-125 P 2.1 - 1-1 27 P 3.7 - 1-128 P 10.5 - 1-129 P 46 - 1-131 P - 4.6 1-1 32 P 1 .6 - 1-1 33 P - 2.8 1-1 34 P 4.6 - 1-135 P 10.5 - 1-1 36 P 5.2 - 1-1 37 P - 2.1 1-138 P - 5.5 1-139 P 2.6 - 1-1 40 P 3.2 - 1-141 P 21 - 1-142 P 5.2 - 1-143 P 4.6 - 1-144 P 10.5 - 1-1 45 P - 1 6 1-146 P - 1 0.5 1-147 P - 1 6 1-148 P - 2.6 1-149 P - 2.3 1-150 P - 3.1 1-1 51 P 3.6 - 1-1 52 P 5.2 - 1-1 53 P - 2.3 1-1 56 P - 2.3 1-1 57 P 10.5 - 1-1 58 P 5.3 - 1-1 59 P 23 - 1-160 P 2.2 - 1-1 61 P - 1 .6 1-1 62 P 3.5 - 1-163 P - 1 .6 1-1 64 P 6.5 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-3 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 19 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 1 ~J" !I~~~'~~ ~P~J1~,i.~" "!~;\,:"X~~bR~U~J;I~ III sSable:.Tri ";". As~ssab uryey: :><',::, _';L~~am1~~~~':~;}~:,:~:: ~~;M~!i~;I:iHu't 1-165 P 10.5 - 1-167 P 10.5 - 1-168 P - 2.2 1-169 p 5.2 - 1-170 P - 0.6 1-171 P 3.3 - 1-173 P 1.6 - 1-175 P - 2.7 1-176 p - 16 1-177 P 2.7 - 1-178 P 2.3 - 1-180 P 5.2 - 1-181 P - 1.6 1-182 P - 2.3 1-183 P 1.6 - 1-184 P 3.3 - 1-185 P - 0.6 1-186 P - 1.6 1-187 P 10.5 - 1-188 P - 06 1-189 P - 0.6 1-190 P - 2.7 1-191 P 2.6 - 1-193 P - 2.7 1-194 P - 10.5 1-197 P - 10.5 1-199 P - 3.3 1-200 P - 2.7 1-201 P - 26 1-202 P - 2.2 1-203 P - 0.6 1-206 p - 3 1-207 P - 1.6 1-209 P 2.7 - 1-210 P - 2.3 1-211 P - 4 1-213 P - 3.5 1-214 P - 0.6 1-216 P - 4.6 1-217 P - 3.2 1-218 P - 2.7 1-220 P - 4.6 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, lnc. May 2008 A-4 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 20 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 Inl>ound '. . Outl>ound . Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip ,., . Survey # (P,C,D,S) Length. .., .' . Length. 1-221 p - 10.5 1-222 P - 2.7 1-223 P - 38 1-224 P - 32 1-225 P - 2 1-226 P - 3.7 1-227 P - 06 1-230 P - 3.6 1-232 P - 3.5 1-233 P - 2.6 1-234 P - 2.1 1-236 P - 0.6 1-237 P - 3.9 1-238 P 0.1 - 1-239 P - 1.6 1-241 P - 4.5 1-243 P - 6.5 1-244 P - 3.1 1-245 P 0.6 - 1-246 P - 3.1 1-247 P - 0.6 1-248 P 52 - 1-251 P - 2.6 1-252 P 0.6 - 1-253 P 0.7 - 1-254 P 1.5 - 1-255 P - 0.1 1-256 P 2.6 1-258 P - 26 1-259 P 1.6 - 1-261 P 1.7 - 1-262 P - 46 1-263 P - 0.1 1-264 p - 2.2 1-266 P - 2.6 1-267 P - 0.6 1-268 P 2.6 - 1-270 P 2.6 - 1-271 P 2.6 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-5 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 21 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 f~\~)~t~i~~~II!~;I~ I- f,] ., .... . . .el\g 1-273 p - 3.5 1-274 P 1.6 - 1-275 P - 0.1 1-276 P - 0.6 1-277 P 2.7 - 1-278 P - 0.6 1-281 P - 3.5 1-283 P - 3.5 1-286 P - 10.5 1-287 P 10.5 - 1-288 P - 4.5 1-289 P - 1.6 1-290 P - 3.5 1-293 P - 3.8 1-294 P - 4.1 1-297 P - 2 1-299 P - 10.5 1-300 P - 2.6 1-301 P - 0.1 1-302 P 2.7 - 1-303 P 2.7 - 1-304 P - 3.3 1-305 P - 3.7 1-306 P - 2.6 1-307 P - 2.7 1-308 P - 1.7 1-310 P - 0.1 1-311 P 1.3 - 1-313 P - 0.1 1-314 P - 10.5 1-315 P - 26 1-316 P - 3.3 1-317 P - 3.2 1-318 P 0.6 - 1-319 P 2.6 - 1-320 P - 0.1 1-321 P 10.5 - 1-322 P - 0.1 1-323 P - 0.1 1-324 P - 0.1 1-325 P 0.1 - 1-326 P 0.1 - 1-330 P 3.9 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-6 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 22 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 . . . Inbound OutbOUnd . . Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip Survey # (P,C,D,S) Length . Length 1-332 p - 0.6 1-334 P - 0.6 1-335 P 0.6 - 1-337 P 3.2 - 1-340 P - 10.5 1-341 P 2.3 - 1-345 P - 5.4 1-346 P - 2.3 1-347 P - 0.6 1-348 P 1.4 - 1-349 P - 10.5 1-350 P - 1 1-351 P 5.4 - 1-352 P - 1.6 1-353 P 06 - 1-354 P - 1.5 1-355 P 1.9 - 1-356 P 10.5 - 1-357 P 10.5 - 1-358 P 1.6 - 1-359 P 23 - 1-360 P - 10.5 1-361 P - 1.5 1-363 P - 10.5 1-365 P 10.5 - 1-366 P - 2.2 1-367 P - 1 1-368 P 16 - 1-369 P 22 - 1-370 P 1 - 1~371 P 3.9 - 1-372 P - 1.3 1-373 P 0.6 - 1-374 P - 2 1-375 P 1.7 - 1-376 P 0.6 - 1-377 P 10.5 - 1-378 P 1.7 - 1-379 P 0.6 - 1-380 P - 3.3 1-381 P - 1.5 1-382 P - 0.9 1-383 P - 1.8 1-384 P 39 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-7 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 23 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 l'ill~II\"~t~f~'~jjfr1Ii" ..... .~.'Jr ~~I~i~!fl~~~ i,~..{t'9.\:!!!19ujtd!...,.. h'.","w'.'~, ","". ..,1~,'i~'il'i'jf}"i'k,~,""<i~('\"\';""~" 7rtr'\.;f1i",L~tl \i:;ASsesllable:jrrij'li' ..i,."',<I?,,,.,...,:....'.~.,.f (Fi;c;o,sj; :-;;~~,';~~\~'rrL~~~"h'~*\!.(:0:!.'. 1 -332 P - 0.6 1-334 P - 0.6 1 -335 P 0.6 - 1 -386 P 1 0.5 - 1-387 P - 3.3 1-388 P - 0.4 1 -389 P - 1 0.5 1 -391 P - 0.1 1-392 P - 2.3 1-394 P O. 1 - 1 -395 P O. 1 - 1 -396 P 2.7 - 1-398 P - 2.6 1-402 P 2.6 - 1 -403 P - 3.9 1 -405 P 1 0.5 - 1 -407 P 1 0.5 - 1-408 P - 1 0.5 1-409 P 3.2 - 1 -41 0 P 2.7 - 1 -41 1 P - 0.9 1-41 3 P O. 1 - 1 -41 4 P 2.6 - 1 -41 5 P 2.6 - 1-41 7 P 1 0.5 - 1-41 9 P - 1 .8 1 -421 P 1 .3 - 1 -422 P - 1 0.5 1-423 P 3.3 - 1-424 P 1 .2 - 1 -426 P - 1 0.5 1 -427 P - 1 .3 1-428 P - 0.8 1 -429 P - 0.6 1 -430 P - 1 0.5 1 -432 P - 1 .6 1-433 P 1 0.5 - 1 -434 P 2. 1 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-8 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 24 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 I},};~,~,'~_:f~;"jf.:k:';~: ~\~i~lifr~I;I~;~J~Yi~~~11i ""P'"cJP'i !",:(P.C:,D,sr: 1-435 p 1 .5 - 1-437 P 0.1 - 1-439 P 5.2 - 1-440 P 10.5 - 1-441 P 0.6 - 1-442 P 0.1 - 1-444 P 1 .1 - 1-448 P 0.6 - 1-451 P - 1 .2 1-453 P 0.6 - 1-455 P 2 - 1-457 P - 10.5 1-458 P - 2 1-459 P - 2.6 1-460 P - 2 1-461 P - 1 3 1-462 P - 0.1 1-463 P 0.1 - 1-464 P 0.1 - 1-465 P 3.2 - 1-466 P - 2.6 1-468 P - 10.5 1-469 P - 2 1-470 P - 4.6 1-471 P - 2 1-472 P - 2.7 1-473 P - 3.2 1-474 p 26 - 1-475 P 3.5 - 1-476 P O. 1 - 1-477 P - 0.1 1-478 P 0.1 - 1-479 P 0.1 - 1-480 P - 1 1-481 P 0.1 - 1-482 P - 0.1 1-483 P 0.1 - 1-484 P - 0.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-9 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 25 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 ...... . .'riD?und '.. .uutDDUna .. . ... ... .s~';"~y ~ Tri"Type Asses.sable Trip .i~ssessableTriP (P,C,D,S) Length ..... Length 1-485 p - 5.4 1-486 P - 5.1 1-487 P - 2.2 1-488 P - 2.3 1-492 P 0.9 - 1-493 P 1.6 - 1-494 P 0.5 - 1-496 P - 2 1-498 P - 4 1-499 P 2.3 - 1-501 P - 3.1 1-502 P 3.7 - 1-503 P - 3.3 1-504 P 2.8 - 1-506 P - 2 1-507 P 4 - 1-508 P - 0.1 1-509 P 0.1 - 1-510 P 2 - 1-511 P - 36 1-512 P 5.8 - 1-513 P 3.3 - 1-515 P 10.5 - 1-516 P 1 - 1-517 P - 1.4 1-518 P 1.5 - 1-519 P 1.6 - 1-521 P - 06 1-522 P - 04 1-524 P - 1.6 1-525 P - 0.1 1-526 P - 0.1 1-527 P - 0.6 1-529 P - 0.9 1-533 P - 1.5 1-538 P - 3.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-10 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 26 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 1 InDo una . OutDouna Trip Type Assessabl~TriP Assessable Trip Survey # (P,C,D,S) Length Length 1-539 p - 0.1 1-540 P - 3.3 1-541 P - 3.2 1-542 P - 0.1 1-544 p - 4.5 1-545 P 1 - 1-546 P 0.1 - 1-548 P - 2.2 1-549 P - 2.4 1-550 P 1.3 - 1-551 P - 16 1-552 P - 0.1 1-555 P - 3.3 1-561 P - 5.2 1-563 P - 0.1 1-565 P - 0.6 1-567 p 2 - 1-568 P - 2 1-571 P - 1 1-572 P 1.5 - 1-574 P - 0.6 1-576 P - 0.1 1-578 P - 0.6 1-579 P - 1.3 1-587 P - 1.5 1-588 P - 0.1 1-592 P - 2.4 1-594 P OR - 1-595 P 14 - 1-596 P - 5.1 1-598 P - 3.3 1-599 P - 0.6 1-602 P 2 - 1-603 P 2.1 - 1-604 P 0.6 - 1-605 P 0.6 - 1-606 P - 0.9 1-607 P - 0.1 1-608 P 10.5 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-ll Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 27 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 mfl?t'~llr!~~ ~llll.]~R~~Il()U"cthi'i/' .';:".;;>)....."\M_>'N~"?'!( ss~l:ile,T"p'), , . ,_it';i"jt-"i"ilf~:.~,~*,~.;;",,, n ,:Oength1,":,,:l;:' 1-608 p 10.5 - 1-609 P - 1 1-610 P 3.3 - 1-611 P 0.1 - 1-612 P 0.4 - 1-613 P - 0.6 1-614 P - 1.6 1-615 P 1.5 - 1-616 P - 13 1-617 P 1.5 - 1-618 P 1.5 - 1-619 P - 1.6 1-620 P 10.5 - 1-621 P 0.1 - 1-623 P - 08 1-624 P 3.8 - 1-625 P - 0.6 1-626 P 0.1 - 1-629 P - 1.5 1-631 P 1.1 - 1-632 P 0.1 - 1-633 P 2.7 - 1-635 P - 2.5 1-636 P - 1.4 1-637 P - 1.7 1-638 P 1.5 - 1-640 P - 1.7 1-641 P - 06 1-644 P 2.1 - 1-645 P - 1.5 1-646 P 0.7 - 1-647 P 10.5 - 1-652 P - 0.9 1-654 P - 1.5 1-655 P - 1.6 1-656 P - 16 1-657 P - 1.5 1-658 P 0.2 - 1-659 P - 1.5 1-660 P 1 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-12 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 28 of 191 Table A-1 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 1 . Inboun.d Outbound Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip Survey # . (P,C,D,S) ....... Length . Length 1-663 P 1.5 - 1-664 P - 10.5 1-665 P - 10.5 1-666 P 10.5 - 1-667 P - 0.6 1-668 P 1.5 - 1-674 P 2.7 - 1-679 P 10.5 - 1-681 P 3.8 - 1-684 P - 06 1-685 P - 1.5 1-686 P - 3.9 1-687 P - 2 1-688 P - 0.6 1-689 P - 0.6 1-691 P - 2.6 1-692 P - 5.2 1-693 P - 3.3 1-694 P - 3.8 1-695 P - 1.7 1-696 P 0.6 - 1-697 P 2.7 - 1-698 P - 1.7 Trip Length Summary: Assessable TriD'Lllnath AveraQe 3.05 Standard Deviation 2.90 Averaae + 30" 11.75 AveraQe - 3a 0.00 Coefficient of Variation 0.951 Count of Assessable Trio Ends 503 Trip Type Summary: Tri T e Count Prima Tri s 503 Diverted Tri s 0 Secondar Tri s 0 Ca lured Trl s 0 Total Surve s. 503 % New Tri s of Total Surve s: % of Total 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-13 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 29 of 191 Table A-2 Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 _~~iri~,I!fl~"~fr'i'.,nb~~rdn""~~J~lliJilill~tf\ ,~['A1i:s~'~s~~le:,J~jrrp.:,t ,,,j,',!,~,',j' "., ',~" ,'. '~~4~~1~"fD,tffi'ri.gtf(\~:~~~~'~.; 2-1 p - 7.3 2-2 P - 13.9 2-3 P - 19.3 2-4 P - 7.8 2-5 P - 7.8 2-6 P - 16.1 2-7 P - 18.9 2-8 P - 7.8 2-9 P - 8.6 2-10 P 0.4 - 2-11 P - 13.7 2-14 P - 17.5 2-15 P - 21.3 2-16 P - 18.9 2-17 P - 18.4 2-18 P - 15.7 2-19 P 10.5 - 2-20 P - 5.7 2-21 P - 5.7 2-22 P 19.2 - 2-23 P 7.8 - 2-24 P - 13.7 2-25 P - 16.8 2-26 P - 107 2-27 P - 12.7 2-28 P - 3.6 2-29 P - 4.8 2-32 P - 189 2-33 P - 10.6 2-34 P - 2.5 2-35 P - 13.7 2-36 P 4.8 - 2-37 P - 21.3 2-38 P - 2.6 2-39 P 2.5 - 2-40 P 21.3 - 2-43 P - 21.3 2-44 P - 12.7 2-45 P 5.2 - 2-46 P 6.9 - 2-47 P 14.1 - 2-48 P - 10.5 2-49 P - 15.7 2-50 P - 12.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-14 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 30 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 2 .. .. Inbound vutoouno ....... Trip Type AssellsableTrip AssessableTrlp ... Survey # (P,C,D,s) I Length . Length 2-51 p - 7.8 2-52 p - 7.8 2-53 p - 7.3 2-54 P - 2.5 2-55 P - 14.1 2-56 p 2.5 - 2-57 P - 11.3 2-58 p - 12.7 2-60 P 5.3 - 2-61 P 21.3 - 2-63 P - 11.7 2-64 P - 15.7 2-65 p - 21.3 2-66 P 14.1 - 2-67 P 2.5 - 2-68 P 17.7 - 2-69 P - 3.2 2-70 p - 11.5 2-71 p 11.7 - 2-72 P 48 - 2-73 P 16.6 - 2-74 P - 12.2 2-76 P - 1.3 2-77 p - 0.2 2-78 P - 8.1 2-79 P 3.1 - 2-80 P 19.3 - 2-81 P 1.3 - 2-82 P - 21.3 2-83 p 11.5 - 2-84 P 21.3 - 2-85 P - 08 2-86 P 2.5 - 2-87 P 3.9 - 2-88 P - 0.6 2-89 p 3.9 - 2-90 P 1.3 - 2-91 P 3.6 - 2-92 P - 21.3 2-93 p - 18.2 - - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-15 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 31 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 ..., mbouno -oillboui1ifC. '. ".._L.<'u 1rrip Type . ~s~~.sable Trip AssessableTrip , (P,C,D,S) Length Length 2-94 p - 10.1 2-95 P 11.1 - 2-96 P - 12.2 2-97 P 11.5 - 2-98 P 8.6 - 2-99 P 3.6 - 2-100 P 21.3 - 2-101 P - 7.2 2-102 P - 20.7 2-103 P 7.6 - 2-104 P - 11.7 2-105 P 18.4 - 2-106 P - 10.6 2-107 P - 17.5 2-108 P 9.1 - 2-109 P - 16.2 2-110 P 1.3 - 2-111 P - 11.6 2-112 P - 15.8 2-113 P 15.7 - 2-114 P 18.4 - 2-115 P - 15.7 2-116 P 8.6 - 2-117 P 15,8 - 2-118 P 11.5 - 2-119 P - 12.3 2-120 P 16.7 - 2-121 P - 1,8 2-122 P - 16.2 2-123 P - 76 2-124 P - 0.3 2-127 P - 11.8 2-128 P 21.3 - 2-129 P - 17.4 2-130 P - 2.5 2-131 P - 20.8 2-132 P - 4.8 2-133 P 4.8 - 2-134 P 2.6 - 2-135 P 3.6 - 2-136 P - 19.6 2-138 P - 21.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-16 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 32 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 I. Inl>ouna . outl>ouna. Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip . Survey # (P,C,D,S) . Length . . . Length 2-139 p - 4.8 2-140 P 21.3 - 2-141 P - 10.6 2-142 P - 9.6 2-143 P - 4.8 2-144 P 2.5 - 2-148 P - 10.7 2-149 P - 2.5 2-150 P 5 - 2-151 P - 2.5 2-153 P - 14.6 2-154 P - 21.3 2-155 P 11.5 - 2-156 P 7.3 - 2-157 P - 2.5 2-158 P - 43 2-160 P - 10.3 2-161 P - 10.6 2-163 P - 12.2 2-165 P 1.3 - 2-166 P - 10.7 2-170 P 2.5 - 2-171 P 68 - 2-172 P 13.9 - 2-173 P 13.6 - 2-174 P 4.5 - 2-175 P - 21.3 2-176 P 13.9 - 2-177 P 2.5 - 2-178 P 20.5 - 2-179 P - 8.6 2-180 P - 46 2-182 P - 2.5 2-183 P 2.5 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-I? Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 33 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 ....., sabr' urvey!,~, ..~. ' '"g 2-184 P - 17.5 2-185 p - 2.5 2-186 p - 1.3 2-187 p - 2.5 2-188 p 8.7 - 2-189 P 4.1 - 2-190 P - 18 2-191 P - 2.5 2-192 P 12.2 - 2-193 P - 137 2-194 P - 2.5 2-195 P 1.3 - 2-196 P 11.9 - 2-197 P 8.6 - 2-198 P - 21.3 2-202 P 21.3 - 2-203 P 7.8 - 2-204 P 5.7 - 2-205 P - 21.3 2-206 p 15.3 - 2-207 P - 18.4 2-208 P - 4.6 2-209 p - 21.3 2-210 P - 78 2-211 p - 7.8 2-212 p - 19.2 2-213 P - 19.2 2-214 p - 213 2-215 P - 13.3 2-216 P - 21.3 2-217 p - 7.8 2-218 P - 18.2 2-219 P - 15.7 2-220 P - 5.7 2-221 P 12.7 - 2-222 P - 12.8 2-223 P - 12.7 2-224 p - 14.3 2-225 P - 18.4 2-226 P - 11.5 2-227 P - 11.5 2-228 P - 20.4 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-18 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 34 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 I'~I- ~,~~~~~un ~~~;i~lil~J; . ....":'~ .T,.P,~j ;;':' '. "'0 "'."~' ~jI,*t'!~"~',""A.,'.;K.;"', ;1>\'.t~"L"''''''1'', "1")~,<\","'lC,,...,'J, , . ",'Ci',,$), }J1:'}Uw~'~:eng :.r'~ti"';:~;~,'" 'en 2-229 P - 18.4 2-232 P - 21.3 2-233 P 4.8 - 2-234 P - 4.6 2-235 P - 12.7 2-236 P - 14.5 2-237 P 13.7 - 2-238 P 10.6 - 2-239 P - 7.3 2-240 P - 2.5 2-241 P - 12.7 2-242 P - 2.5 2-243 P - 2.5 2-244 P - 4.4 2-246 P - 16.2 2-247 P 2.5 - 2-249 P - 12.7 2-250 P - 13.7 2-252 P 21.3 - 2-253 P - 14.8 2-255 P 96 - 2-256 P 16.2 - 2-257 P 17 - 2-258 P - 19.1 2-259 P - 8.6 2-261 P - 17 2-262 P - 11 .5 2-263 P - 3.9 2-264 P 15.1 - 2-266 P - 21.3 2-267 P - 12.7 2-268 P 2.5 - 2-269 P - 4.1 2-270 P 14.8 - 2-271 P 2 - 2-272 P 2.5 - 2-273 P - 2.5 2-274 P 11.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-19 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 35 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 2 .... Trip Type . ... 1n.l>ouna 9ulDoui1lf Survey # ... Asse~s~bl~ Tri p Assessable Trip .... (P,C,D,S) Length ..... Length 2-275 p - 18.7 2-276 P - 4.6 2-277 P 14.6 - 2-278 P - 12.7 2-279 P - 17.9 2-280 P 13 - 2-282 P - 4.8 2-283 P - 21.3 2-284 P 9.6 - 2-285 P - 2.5 2-286 P 18.2 - 2-287 P - 12.6 2-288 P - 4.8 2-289 P 4.6 - 2-290 P 15.8 - 2-291 P 19.3 - 2-292 P - 11.5 2-293 P 21.3 - 2-294 P 12.6 - 2-295 P 18.2 - 2-296 P - 8.6 2-297 P 12.7 - 2-298 P 13.2 - 2-299 P - 15.8 2-301 P - 17.4 2-302 P - 14 2-303 P 13.7 - 2-304 P 2.5 - 2-305 P - 4.8 2-308 P - 2.5 2-309 P - 21.3 2-310 P - 14 2-311 P - 4.8 2-312 P 4.8 - 2-314 P - 12.7 2-315 P - 21.3 2-316 P 16 - 2-319 P - 8.6 2-320 P - 13.7 2-321 P - 13.3 2-323 P - 2.5 2-324 P 2.5 - 2-326 P 8.6 - 2-327 P - 2.5 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-20 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 36 of 191 Table A-2 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 2 Inb.ouna UutllOuna. Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip Survey # (P,C,D,S) . . Length Length 2-331 p - 2.5 2-332 P 8.6 - 2-333 P 14.4 - 2-334 P 21.3 - 2-339 P 12.7 - 2-341 P - 11.7 2-342 P 19.4 - 2-344 P - 14.5 2-345 P - 2.5 2-348 P - 4.8 2-354 P 2.5 - 2-356 P 10.1 - 2-357 P 2.5 - 2-358 P - 20.5 2-364 P - 21.3 2-365 P 2.5 - 2-366 P 2.5 - 2-367 P 2.5 - 2-368 P 9 - 2-369 P 4.6 - 2-370 P - 2.5 2-371 P 17.1 - 2-372 P 213 - 2-373 P 11.7 - 2-374 P 13.7 - 2-375 P 13.7 - 2-376 P 19.3 - 2-377 P 15.8 - 2-378 P 11.7 - 2-379 P 2.5 - - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-21 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 37 of 191 Trip Length Summary: Assessable Trip Length Averaae 10.98 Standard Deviation 6.46 Averaae + 30- 30.37 Averaae - 30" 0.00 Coefficient of Variation 0.589 Count of Assessable Trio Ends 314 Trip Type Summary: Trr T e Count Primar Tri s 314 Diverted T ri s 0 Secondar Trl s 0 Ca tured Tri s 0 Total Surve s: 314 % New Trips of Total Surveys: % of Total 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-22 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 38 of 191 Table A-3 Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 Inbound Outbound Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip Survey # (P,C,D,S) Length " ,,: Length 3-1 p - 20.2 3-2 P - 17.3 3-3 P - 11.6 3-4 P - 1.6 3-6 P - 18.2 3-8 P - 14 3-11 P - 20.2 3-12 P - 146 3-13 P - 12.4 3-15 P - 19.2 3-17 P - 18.5 3-19 P - 14 3-20 P - 13.9 3-22 P - 5.9 3-23 P - 14.9 3-24 P - 7.7 3-25 P - 14.1 3-26 P 3.9 - 3-27 P 8.2 - 3-28 P 17.4 - 3-29 P - 17.8 3-30 p - 5.5 3-31 P - 7.4 3-33 p 04 - 3-34 P - 6.5 3-38 P - 7.4 3-39 P - 15.2 3-41 p 79 - 3-43 P - 11.3 3-45 P - 11 3-46 p - 5.9 3-49 P - 14.9 3-50 P - 5.9 3-52 p - 10 3-53 P - 14 3-55 p 4.5 - 3-57 P - 13.5 3-60 P - 15.6 3-62 p - 13.8 3-63 p 12.4 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-23 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 39 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 ............................ IIi~o~nd '. .. ()~tb"und ........ Trip Type Assessa~I~Trjp Assess~ble Trip .. (P,C,D,S) Length Length 3-64 p 13.7 - 3-67 P - 20.2 3-68 P 5.6 - 3-69 P - 5.9 3-70 P - 20.2 3-71 P - 5.5 3-72 P - 8.9 3-73 P 13.6 - 3-74 P 14.1 - 3-75 P - 5.6 3-76 P 5.6 - 3-77 P - 6.2 3-78 P - 14.1 3-79 P 11.2 - 3-81 P 14.2 - 3-82 P 10.6 - 3-83 P 12.6 - 3-84 P - 10 3-85 P - 15.1 3-86 P - 14.6 3-87 P - 10 3-88 P - 20.2 3-89 P - 20.2 3-91 P - 20.2 3-93 P 18.4 - 3-94 P 11.5 - 3-96 P 18.2 - 3-97 P 10.2 - 3-98 P - 5.5 3-99 P - 10 3-100 P - 5.8 3-102 P - 18.4 3-103 P - 14.6 3-105 P - 5.5 3-106 P - 20.2 3-108 P - 7.4 3-113 P - 14.1 3-114 P - 14.4 3-115 P - 14.3 3-116 P - 5.6 3-118 P 5.6 - 3-119 P 20.2 - 3-121 P - 13 Tindale-OJiver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-24 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 40 of 191 Table A.3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 '. moouna Outbound' ... Trip Type Assess.ableTrip AssessableTrip Survey # .... (P,C,D,S) I Length Length . .. 3-122 P - 12.6 3-123 P 15.1 - 3-124 P 17.4 - 3-125 P - 7.4 3-126 P - 13.1 3-127 P - 14.9 3-132 P 7.3 - 3-134 P - 0.9 3-136 P - 18.5 3-137 P 14.1 - 3-138 P 5.6 - 3-139 P 20.2 - 3-140 P 5.5 - 3-141 P 20.2 - 3-143 P 2.9 - 3-145 P 6.5 - 3-146 P 15.8 - 3-147 P 17.5 - 3-148 P - 14.1 3-149 P 18.8 - 3-150 P - 4.1 3-151 P 14.9 - 3-155 P - 11.7 3-156 P - 13.8 3-160 P 14.2 - 3-162 P 14.2 - 3-163 P 5.6 - 3-165 P - 20.2 3-167 P 14 - 3-174 P - 14.9 3-175 P - 13.1 3-182 P 14.8 - 3-184 P - 18.9 3-186 P 19.2 - 3-187 P 18.4 - 3-190 P 9 - 3-191 P - 20.2 3-192 P - 12.1 3-193 P - 17.5 3-195 P - 5.6 Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc. May 2008 A-25 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 41 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 ,....)0." '" / ""..,> Inlloun<l, , oUl!'oui'ilr yip Trpe Ass~ss~bl~rrip Assessable Trip (P,C,D,S) . Length Length 3-196 p - 5.9 3-198 P - 13.2 3-199 p - 5.6 3-200 P - 5.9 3-202 p - 19.4 3-203 P 3.9 - 3-205 P - 10 3-206 P - 10 3-207 P - 20.2 3-210 P - 14.2 3-212 P - 2.6 3-214 P - 17.8 3-215 P - 16.4 3-216 p - 14.4 3-218 P 19.7 - 3-219 P - 13.6 3-220 p - 20.2 3-221 p - 2.6 3-223 P - 1 3-224 P - 12.4 3-225 P - 14 3-227 P - 2.9 3-228 p 20.2 - 3-229 P - 161 3-231 P 15.5 - 3-235 P 17.2 - 3-236 P 5.5 - 3-237 P - 5,6 3-239 P 20.2 - 3-240 P 5.6 - 3-241 P - 10 3-242 P 5.5 - 3-244 P 5.6 - 3-245 P 14.2 - 3-248 P 11.8 - 3-251 P - 18.5 3-252 P 3.9 - 3-253 P 20.2 - 3-254 P 11.2 - Tindale-otiver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-26 Collier County SF Trip Charactetistics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 42 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 .. . . Inbound UutDouno Trip Type Asse~sable Trip Assessabl.e Trip Survey # (P,C,D,S) Length Length 3-255 p 9.2 - 3-258 P 13.7 - 3-259 P 5.6 - 3-260 P 20.2 - 3-261 P - 13.8 3-264 P 5.6 - 3-265 P - 5.5 3-266 P 9 - 3-267 P 12.6 - 3-268 P 7.2 - 3-269 P 5.6 - 3-270 P 5.6 - 3-272 P 15 - 3-273 P - 7.3 3-275 P 8 - 3-276 P 5.5 - 3-277 P 18.2 - 3-278 P 10 - 3-280 P - 5.5 3-282 P 10 - 3-286 P 13.1 - 3-287 P 14.1 - 3-290 P 13.7 - 3-291 P 15.6 3-292 P 5.6 - 3-293 P 5.6 - 3-294 P 14.2 - 3-295 P 5.6 - 3-297 P 10 - 3-298 P - 20.2 3-300 P 2.6 - 3-301 P 5.6 - 3-302 P 13.1 - 3-304 P 9 - 3-305 P 5.6 - 3-307 P 5.6 - 3-308 P 5.6 - 3-311 P 13.2 - 3-312 P - 89 3-313 P - 6.8 3-315 P 8.6 - 3-317 P 14.1 - 3-324 P 2.6 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-27 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 43 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 , ,lnDo~n<l " Outbound ",<iV/Ii ',; Tri~ry~e Asse~"able:rri~ AssessableTrip ",' (P,C,D,S) ", Length '.;;,,' ; Length ",' ,.,' , 3-327 P 5.6 - 3-328 P 5.6 - 3-329 P 15.7 - 3-330 P 18 - 3-331 P 18.8 - 3-332 P - 10.7 3-335 P - 14 3-338 P 8 - 3-340 P 20.2 - 3-342 P 5.6 - 3-343 P 13.7 - 3-345 P 10 - 3-346 P 7.9 - 3-351 P 13.5 - 3-352 P 5.6 - 3-353 P 14 - 3-355 P 19 - 3-356 P 13.5 - 3-361 P - 8 3-362 P 11.7 - 3-363 P 10 - 3-364 P - 10.1 3-366 P 5.6 - 3-367 P - 13.1 3-368 P 5.6 - 3-371 P 5.5 - 3-372 P - 11.2 3-373 P - 10.1 3-374 P - 5.5 3-376 P 10.3 - 3-377 P 5.6 - 3-379 P 10 - 3-380 P 14.2 - 3-381 P 0.8 - 3-384 P 20.2 - 3-385 P 5.6 - 3-386 P 11.7 - 3-388 P 20.2 - 3-390 P 2.6 - 3-391 P - 13.1 3-392 P - 5.9 3-393 P 5.6 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-28 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 44 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 1'''':ii~jl_iijW';_>11jl.}iti'~1~ [""" ii, ."'" !1l'rfil'c, " . ~;itrJ~1; ".'" , . ,."'-,'''", ffilrfi" , " . . ,~. ..", " u . (F,!iC;O;S. ,enIl11L,. ' ,,,' 3-394 P - 12.4 3-395 P 20.2 - 3-397 P 19.7 - 3-400 P 14 - 3-401 P 17.3 - 3-402 P 14 - 3-405 P - 5.5 3-407 P 14.9 - 3-408 P 6.5 - 3-409 P - 20.2 3-410 P 6.4 - 3-414 P 5.6 - 3-417 P 5.6 - 3-420 P - 89 3-426 P 13.7 - 3-427 P - 14.4 3-428 P - 12.6 3-430 P - 14 3-431 P - 13.8 3-435 P - 5.5 3-438 P 5.6 - 3-439 P - 8.8 3-441 P - 5.5 3-442 P 14.2 - 3-443 P - 14.1 3-444 P , 0.2 3-445 P - 18.4 3-446 P - 10 3-447 P - 14.4 3-448 P - 17.3 3-449 P - 18.5 3-450 P - 19 3-454 P 10.6 - 3-455 P - 15.2 3-457 P - 5.5 3-458 P 5.6 - 3-459 P - 18.5 3-460 P - 5.5 3-461 P - 20.2 3-462 P - 12.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc. May 2008 A-29 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 45 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 ",' ," . , ,;",'OjD; ... ~ n ," 3-463 P - 11.7 3-464 P , 13.5 3-465 P - 19.7 3-466 P - 13.8 3-468 P - 12.4 3-469 P - 15 3-470 P - 18.5 3-473 P - 13.6 3-474 P - 14.4 3-475 P - 20.2 3-476 P 5.5 - 3-479 P , 14 3-480 P - 12.9 3-481 P - 10 3-482 P - 139 3-483 P , 14.1 3-484 P - 5.6 3-486 P - 11.7 3-487 P - 5.9 3-488 P , 20.2 3-489 P 11.7 - 3-490 P - 13.6 3-491 P , 18.3 3-492 P - 5.5 3-493 P - 5.5 3-494 P - 13.5 3-495 P , 10 3-497 P - 15.6 3-498 P - 14.1 3-499 P - 5.5 3,501 P 13.8 - 3-502 P - 10 3-503 P - 20.2 3,504 P - 17.2 3-505 P - 10 3-506 P - 5.5 3-507 P - 12.9 3,509 P - 10.6 3-510 P - 20.2 3-511 P 5.6 - 3-512 P - 5.5 3-513 P 5.6 - 3-515 P , 17.5 Timmie-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-30 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 46 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 I' Inbouna UutDouna Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip SUrV"y# (P,C,D,S) r Length.." . Length' 3-516 p - 18.3 3-518 P - 8.9 3-519 P - 8.2 3-521 P - 5.5 3-522 P - 5.5 3-524 P - 5.5 3-525 P - 5.6 3-526 P - 5.6 3-527 P - 5.6 3-528 P - 5.6 3-529 P - 5.6 3-530 P - 5.6 3-531 P - 13.8 3-532 P - 5.6 3-533 P - 3.9 3-534 P - 5.6 3-535 P 5.5 - 3-536 P - 13.5 3-537 P - 3.9 3-538 P - 5.6 3-539 P - 5.6 3-541 P - 11.7 3-542 P - 5.6 3-543 P - 5.6 3-545 P - 5.6 3-546 P - 15.8 3-547 P - 14.8 3-548 P - 56 3-549 P 5.5 - 3-550 P - 5.6 3-551 P - 5.6 3-552 P - 5.6 3-553 P - 20.2 3-554 P - 13.6 3-555 P - 3.9 3-556 P - 5.6 3-557 P - 14.6 3-558 P - 5.6 3-559 P - 13.6 3-560 P - 10 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-31 Coliier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 47 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 .... . In~ouna . out~ouna. ... ............ Trip Type Asse.ssable Tri p' Assessable Trip ,. .....,. ..... .....'0 . (P,C,D,S) Length Length 3-561 p 5.5 - 3-562 P - 5.6 3-563 P - 5.6 3-564 P - 5.5 3-565 P 5.5 - 3-567 P - 11.1 3-568 P - 20.2 3-569 P - 5.6 3-570 P - 14.1 3-571 P - 20.2 3-572 P - 20.2 3-573 P - 20.2 3-574 P - 20.2 3-575 P 5.6 - 3-576 P 20.2 - 3-577 P - 5.6 3-579 P - 5.6 3-580 P - 5.6 3-581 P - 20.2 3-582 P - 6.2 3-583 P - 20.2 3-584 P - 5.6 3-585 P - 19.5 3-586 P 10 - 3-587 P - 12.4 3-588 P - 10.1 3-589 P - 10 3-591 P - 20.2 3-593 P - 17.3 3-594 P - 20.2 3-595 P - 12.9 3-605-1 P 14.4 - 3-611-1 P 13.7 - 3-609-2 P 14.4 - 3-610-2 P 14.6 - 3-611-2 P 5.6 - 3-613 P 6.9 - 3-615 P 14.3 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-32 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 48 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 InDouna UUIDouna, Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip Suniey # (P,C,D,S) Length Length .., 3-616 P 20.2 - 3-619 P 5.5 - 3-620 P 20.2 - 3-621 P 88 - 3-622 P 8.8 - 3-624 P 20.2 - 3-625 P 14.2 - 3-626 P 2.6 - 3-627 P 20.2 - 3-628 P 2.6 - 3-629 P - 17.5 3-632 P 2.6 - 3-634 P 20.2 - 3-635 P 13.7 - 3-636 P 13.9 - 3-637 P 2.6 - 3-638 P 5.5 - 3-639 P 2.6 - 3-640 P 20.2 - 3-641 P 11.1 - 3-642 P 5.5 - 3-643 P 5.5 - 3-649 P 14.2 - 3-650 P 5.5 - 3-652 P 11.7 - 3-653 P 5.5 - 3-654 P 5.5 - 3-655 P 5.5 - 3-666 P 9 - 3-667 P 14.1 - 3-668 P 5.5 - 3-670 P 14.1 - 3-672 P 16.4 - 3-673 P 14.2 - 3-674 P 13.8 - 3-675 P 5.5 - 3-676 P 5.5 - 3-677 P 5.5 - 3-678 P 13.6 - Tindale-OIiver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-33 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 49 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 3 ....,id~." ';,'........-,:..'.'..i.:...' .'" InDouiilf ',. outDoUna ,., Ii if ... .]-.rIPTY~~ AS...~~#l>l~Trlp AS~Il~ll~I~IrtP ,>, F' (P,C,D,S) . '., Length.\;>' ' Length' . 3-679 P 14.1 - 3-680 P 5.5 - 3-681 P 5.5 - 3-682 P 0.6 - 3-683 , P 5.5 - 3-685 P 14.1 - 3-686 P 16 - 3-688 P 20.2 - 3-689 P 14.1 - 3-690 P 5.5 - 3-691 P 5.5 - 3-692 P 13.7 - 3-693 P 12.1 - 3-694 P 14.2 - 3-697 P 14.1 - 3-699 P 17.5 - 3-702 P - 5.5 3-703 P 5.5 - 3-704 P - 5.6 3-705 P 7.7 - 3-706 P 10 - 3-707 P 5.5 - 3-708 P 13.8 - 3-715 P 20.2 - 3-716 P 14.1 - 3-717 P 13.7 - 3-718 P 5.5 - 3-719 P 14.1 - 3-720 P 5.5 - 3-721 P 5.5 - 3-722 P 14.1 - 3-723 P 7.6 - 3-724 P 12.9 - 3-728 P 12.9 - 3-729 P 14.1 - 3-732 P 13.7 - 3-734 P 2.6 - 3-735 P 14.7 - 3-736 P 15.6 - 3-738 P 20.2 - 3-740 P 18 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-34 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 50 of 191 Table A-3 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 3 3-741 3-744 3-745 3-746 3-747 3-749 3-751 3-753 3-757 3-758 3-760 3-761 3-762 3-764 3-765 3-766 3-767 3-768 3-773 3-777 3-780 3-781 3-785 3-787 p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p , " Inbound Assessable Trip . ::':," Length , . 2.6 8.7 15.5 11.7 5.5 5.5 ! , ,:,u'Douna Assessable Trip , Length' I _ '. " , , Trl"TYP~ '., (P,C,D,S) 14.1 13.8 17.5 7.4 14.1 14.4 17,3 5.5 5.6 5.6 13.8 13.5 14.1 13.7 5.6 5.6 18.8 20.2 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-35 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 51 of191 Trip Length Summary: Ii' ',.c'>i>>i:,,"" AS$!l1l$81l1ii ltlDili.eilatll1il~, .'.. Averaae 11.29 Standard Deviation 5,41 Averaae + 30- 27.51 Averaae ~ 30' 0.00 Coefficient of Variation 0,479 Count of Assessable Trio Ends 512 Prima Tri s 512 100% Diverted Tri s 0 0% Seconda Tri s 0 0% Ca tured Tri 5 0 0% Total Surve s: 512 % New Tri s of Total Surve s: 100% Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-36 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 52 of 191 Table A.4 Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 '. , .,"Do.~na, . '.' Outbound . S~"'ey# ...... Trip Type "Ass~sS~bl~}!lp ~$l!~~abl~Tril' (P,C,D,S) .. "':llirigtti. . Length 4-1 p - 0.8 4-2 p 7.7 - 4-4 P - 14.9 4-6 P - 9.6 4-7 p - 8.9 4-8 P - 6.2 4-9 P - 10.9 4-10 P - 6.2 4-11 P 14.9 - 4-12 P 7.3 - 4-13 P - 5.3 4-14 P - 9.5 4-15 P - 7.3 4-16 P - 12.3 4-17 P - 14.9 4-18 P - 12.9 4-19 P - 8.9 4-20 P - 5 4-21 P - 11.9 4-23 P - 12 4-25 P - 3.9 4-26 P - 5.1 4-27 P - 6.9 4-28 P - 9.7 4-29 P - 6.7 4-30 P - 7.1 4-31 P - 3.4 4-32 P - 4 4-33 P - 0.3 4-34 p - 4.1 4-35 P - 2.8 4-36 P - 3.1 4-38 P - 1.2 4-39 P - 2.6 4-40 P - 2.6 4-42 P - 8.9 4-43 P - 4.3 4-44 P - 1.2 4-45 p - 11.7 TindaJe-Oliver & Associates. Inc. May 2008 A-37 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 53 of 191 Table A.4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 ............/.......i...m. ;'::,:~:: ,,<:'',') ,.il~.~C)~I'1~< .. ...,9~tb()lJ~d rrl~orype ~.s~~~~~I~TriR .. AlI~~~~.~le;1;t@ .y., (P;CiD,S) . [''"9th' , .' .1' :.; Length'':' . 4-46 P - 9.1 4-47 P - 6.6 4-48 P - 0.3 4-50 P - 88 4-51 P - 0.3 4-52 P - 10.2 4-53 P 0.3 - 4-55 P 1 .6 - 4-56 P - 14.9 4-57 P - 5.6 4-58 P - 5.1 4-59 P - 1 3.4 4-60 P - 14.9 4-63 P - 14.3 4-64 P - 1 .9 4-65 P - 14.9 4-66 P - 2.4 4-67 p - 1 .9 4-68 P - 3.9 4-69 P - 8 4-70 P - 14.3 4-71 P - 149 4-73 P - 6.2 4-74 p - 3.1 4-76 P - 7.6 4-77 P - 93 4-78 P - 1 4.9 4-79 P - 8.1 4-80 P - 6.6 4-81 P - 14.9 4-82 P - 4.9 4-83 p - 0.3 4-84 p 4.7 - 4-85 P - 1 9 4-86 P - 7.6 4-88 P - 14.9 4-89 p - 5.1 4-90 P - 14.9 4-91 P - 3.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-38 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 54 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 .. :/,..... .In~ound . '. Outbound I;,.,:, ":;'..2'-',.11'/\ Trip Type ~~SIlssabl~J:rlp A!;~"~,s"ble!r1p (P,C,D,S) "':>Length . length ... 4-92 P - 1.4 4-94 P 2 - 4-95 P 2 - 4-96 P - 7.1 4-98 P - 6.6 4-99 P 2 - 4-100 P 8.1 - 4-102 P - 8.2 4-103 P - 3.1 4-104 P - 5.1 4-105 P - 10 4-106 P 5.8 - 4-107 P - 14.9 4-108 P - 6.6 4-109 P - 14.9 4-110 P - 7.1 4-111 P 6.2 - 4-112 P 2.6 - 4-113 P - 86 4-114 P 7.7 - 4-115 P - 7.6 4-116 P - 0.3 4-117 P - 9.3 4-118 P - 0.3 4-119 P - 7.6 4-122 P - 3.1 4-123 P - 7.6 4-124 P - 13.5 4-126 P - 5.1 4-128 P - 10.7 4-129 P - 14.9 4-130 P 10.5 - 4-131 P - 13.7 4-132 P - 9.2 4-133 P - 14.9 4-135 P - 1.9 4-136 P - 3.1 4-137 P - 13.7 4-138 P - 11.6 4-139 P - 5.1 4-140 P 3.4 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-39 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 55 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 1...........;ti,.i".l/i;.. ................." . ..'n.9"ulla.. ()UtD"Un" !fiplype As.ses~~ble:Trjl' .. Assessable Trip " (I'.CoD,S) '. length . ,':t~~gth ... 4-142 P - 0.3 4-143 P - 5.1 4-145 P - 1.7 4-147 P - 7.6 4-149 p - 03 4-150 p 0.3 - 4-151 P 0.8 - 4-152 P - 14.5 4-153 P - 0.3 4-154 P - 8 4-155 P - 1.3 4-156 P - 2.1 4-157 P - 13.7 4-158 P 2 - 4-159 P - 7.3 4-160 P - 2 4-161 P - 13.4 4-162 P - 1.9 4-163 P 3.1 - 4-165 P - 0.3 4-166 p - 14.9 4-167 P 12 - 4-168 P - 14.9 4-169 P - 1.9 4-171 P - 12.8 4-173 P - 6.2 4-174 P 8.9 - 4-175 P - 3.1 4-176 P 0.3 - 4-177 P 7.3 - 4-178 P 3.1 - 4-179 P - 31 4-180 p - 12.2 4-181 P - 6.7 4-182 P - 3.6 4-183 P - 66 4-184 p - 1.4 4-185 P - 5.1 4-186 P - 14.9 4-187 P - 0.3 4-189 P - 9.7 4-190 P - 1.7 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-40 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 56 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 " ,'.... Inoouna ' . I ,', . Outbound Trip Type ASsessable Trip As~s.s,able Trip Survey #' (P,C,D,S) .., , L"ngth .' Length. .', 4-191 P - 1.4 4-192 P - 14.9 4-193 P - 1.9 4-194 P - 2.4 4-195 P - 14.9 4-196 P - 1.7 4-197 P - 8.2 4-198 P - 1.4 4-199 P - 0.3 4-200 P 8.7 - 4-201 P - 3.5 4-202 P - 7.3 4-203 P 7.1 - 4-204 P 3.1 - 4-205 P 1.3 - 4-206 P 6.7 - 4-207 P 4.5 - 4-208 P 5 - 4-209 P 6.9 - 4-210 P 2.1 - 4-212 P 14.9 - 4-213 P 13.2 - 4-214 P 14.9 - 4-215 P 12.3 - 4-216 P - 2 4-217 P 4.5 - 4-218 P 4.6 - 4-219 P 5 - 4-221 P - 1.4 4-222 P 14.9 - 4-223 P - 3.1 4-225 P - 1,9 4-226 P 3.9 - 4-227 P - 1.9 4-228 P - 1.7 4-230 P - 14.9 4-231 P - 3.1 4-232 P - 5.1 4-233 P - 1.9 4-234 P - 14.9 4-235 P - 3.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-41 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 57 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 '., Trip Type ".,.../',ii6pund 'll~tl),l)una, ",'>C':j""."":.",, ASses~~bl~,.rip , Ass~~sllj,l~ Trip (I',C,0;5) Length j" L~ngth 4-236 p - 0.3 4-237 P - 0.3 4-238 P - 68 4-239 P - 7.6 4-240 P - 1.7 4-241 P 1.1 - 4-242 P 7.7 - 4-243 P 3.9 - 4-244 P 14.9 - 4-245 P 1.4 - 4-246 P 2.1 - 4-247 P - 2 4-248 P - 1.7 4-249 P - 1.7 4-250 P 4.9 - 4-251 P 3.1 - 4-252 P - 3.1 4-253 P - 1.4 4-254 P - 1.9 4-255 P 14.9 - 4-259 P 3.1 - 4-260 P - 2 4-261 P - 0.3 4-262 P - 6.2 4-263 P - 14.9 4-264 P - 14.9 4-265 P - 7 4-266 P - 1.9 4-267 P - 0.3 4-268 P - 0.3 4-269 P - 9.5 4-270 P 0.3 - 4-271 P - 6.8 4-272 P 2 - 4-274 P - 13.1 4-275 P - 14.9 4-277 P - 1.4 4-278 P 4.4 - 4-279 P 1.1 - 4-280 P 14.6 - 4-281 P 1.1 - 4-282 P 2 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-42 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 58 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 " . .lnlJouna ..... .. . OutlJouna I'. ... ... ......... Trip Type AssossableTrlp Assessable Trip , (PiC,D,S) 'L"ngth". Length . 4-283 P 10.5 - 4-284 P 14.9 - 4-285 P 14.9 - 4-286 P 14.9 - 4-287 P 6.2 - 4-288 P - 54 4-289 P - 14 4-290 P 14.9 - 4-292 P 12.7 - 4-293 P 2.1 - 4-294 P 14.9 - 4-295 P - 1.7 4-296 P 14.9 - 4-297 P - 68 4-298 P - 1.9 4-299 P 3.1 - 4-300 P - 124 4-301 P 12 - 4-302 P 8.9 - 4-303 P 14.9 - 4-304 P 10.2 - 4-305 P - 7.1 4-306 P - 124 4-307 P - 2.1 4-309 P - 5 4-310 P - 10.1 4-312 P - 11.7 4-313 P - 1.9 4-314 P - 14.9 4-315 P 2.1 - 4-316 P 12 - 4-317 P 14.9 - 4-318 P - 7.9 4-319 P - 5 4-320 P - 2 4-321 P - 7.3 4-322 P - 14 4-324 P 14.9 - 4-325 P - 8.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-43 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 59 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ..' .>.<Y..T;c tfi~T~~~ :. .I.~~ou~d ..... ..: ....':'yt~~una. I ASs~s~abl~Trjl? 'Asses$~ble Trl~ .'i :",<'.'<i"Of:','i:":,{-,""":'ii,,..,,; .... .i.... (P,C,D,Sl . Lellgth . ..i Lellgth',".n. 4-326 p - 8.4 4-327 P - 14.9 4-328 P 11.5 - 4-329 P - 14.9 4-330 P - 1.4 4-331 P - 1.7 4-333 P - 14.9 4-334 P - 14.9 4-335 P - 68 4-336 P 9.2 - 4-337 P - 66 4-338 P - 9.3 4-339 P - 14.9 4-340 P - 7.4 4-341 P - 9.1 4-343 P - 1.3 4-344 P - 1.9 4-345 P 14.9 - 4-346 P 5.1 - 4-347 P 13.8 - 4-348 P 0.8 - 4-349 P 7.2 - 4-350 P - 7.1 4-351 P 1.3 - 4-352 P - 14 4-353 P - 5.1 4-354 P 7.6 - 4-354 P - 5.1 4-355 P 2.5 - 4-356 P - 9.3 4-357 P 1.3 - 4-358 P - 9.3 4-359 P - 5.2 4-361 P 3.1 - 4-363 P - 6.6 4-364 P - 12.6 4-365 P 1.3 - 4-366 P - 3.1 4-367 P 1.3 - 4-368 P 14.1 - 4-369 P - 1.3 4-370 P - 2.2 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-44 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 60 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 iii . .. InDOUn.D OutbOund < ......... y~>/ Trip Type Assessable Trip Assessable Trip (!"C,D,S) ". Lehgth>. Length 4-371 p 8.7 - 4-372 P 1.3 - 4-373 P 2 - 4-374 P - 14.9 4-375 P 1.7 - 4-376 P 14.9 - 4-377 P 13 - 4-378 P 12.3 - 4-379 P - 2 4-380 P - 22 4-381 P 1.3 - 4-382 P 7.7 - 4-383 P - 14.9 4-384 P - 0.9 4-385 P - 6.6 4-386 P - 8.2 4-387 P - 0.7 4-388 P - 7.6 4-389 P - 14 4-390 P 7.7 - 4-391 P 1.9 - 4-392 P - 6.5 4-393 P - 11.9 4-394 P 5.8 - 4-395 P 14.9 - 4-396 P - 12.8 4-397 P - 8 4-398 P 1.1 - 4-399 P 9.7 - 4-401 P 3.1 - 4-402 P - 1.9 4-403 P - 6.7 4-404 P - 8.2 4-405 P - 14.9 4-406 P 14 - 4-407 P 14.9 - 4-408 P - 1.4 4-409 P - 12.8 4-410 P - 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-45 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 61 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 I..is, 0........ ..".....,.'.:...,,-.' '\.ll1bo~ndc ..I.}UtDo~nd ',/. ,.J/ trl~;Ty~e ./~~ess~~le/,!"[jp .' ~~es~~bl!~rlp'; ....... (P,C,O;S) . .C:'" LengthJ . .. . '''''Length '.' 4-411 P - 6.6 4-412 P 12.7 - 4-413 P 14.3 - 4-414 P 1.7 - 4-415 P 14.9 - 4-416 P - 3.1 4-417 P - 1.4 4-418 P - 76 4-419 P 6.1 - 4-420 P 6.2 - 4-421 P - 7.1 4-422 P - 9.4 4-423 P - 14.9 4-424 P - 1.9 4-425 P 14.9 - 4-426 P 2 - 4-427 P 8.9 - 4-428 P - 1.4 4-429 P - 7.6 4-430 P - 3.1 4-431 P - 2 4-432 P - 8 4-433 P - 2 4-434 P 5.8 - 4-435 P 9.7 - 4-436 P - 1.4 4-438 P - 7.7 4-440 P - 14.9 4-441 P - 8.1 4-442 P - 6.7 4-443 P - 0.3 4-444 P - 7.7 4-445 P 1.1 - 4-446 P 11.4 - 4-447 P - 6.2 4-448 P - 4.8 4-451 P - 13.4 4-452 P - 9.1 4-453 P - 0.3 4-455 P - 10.1 4-456 P - 0.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-46 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 62 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 > InDOUna . OUtbouna I.... 1:' /#ii+......... TripType . AsSllssableTrip Assessable Trip . (P,t,D,S) l.e'ilgth .........' l.ength 4-457 p - 10.8 4-458 P 3.1 - 4-459 P - 13.1 4-460 P - 3.1 4-461 P - 7.1 4-462 P - 7.8 4-463 P - 14.9 4-464 P - 6.3 4-465 P - 2.9 4-467 P - 5.1 4-470 P - 7.6 4-471 P - 6.2 4-472 P - 0.3 4-473 P - 9.1 4-474 P 2.1 - 4-475 P 13.4 - 4-476 P - 2.1 4-477 P - 1.9 4-478 P - 1.4 4-479 P - 12.8 4-480 P - 10.6 4-481 P 6.6 - 4-483 P 14.9 - 4-484 P 5 - 4-485 P - 14.4 4-486 P - 9.1 4-487 P - 1.4 4-488 P - 1.9 4-489 P - 3.1 4-490 P - 6.4 4-492 P - 7.6 4-493 P - 5.1 4-494 P - 1.9 4-495 P - 13.1 4-496 P - 3.1 4-497 P - 1.4 4-498 P - 5.1 4-499 P - 9.6 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-47 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 63 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ::. i\.(~:.......;#,!<i.<.. ,.rip;ry~~ ': :"n~?un<l ".!()ptpou~a.< ASs~~~~~!~Trip As~e~s~bl~Tr'~ . IP;C,O,S} ',' . Length ' ,. Length;:: " " 4-501 P 2 - 4-502 P - 3.1 4-503 P - 13.5 4-504 P 11.4 - 4-505 P 2 - 4-506 P - 5.5 4-507 p - 7.6 4-508 P - 7.6 4-509 P 3.4 - 4-510 P 0.3 - 4-511 P - 4.3 4-512 p 3.8 - 4-513 P - 8.9 4-514 P 8.9 - 4-515 P 2.1 - 4-516 P 0.3 - 4-517 P - 6.6 4-518 P - 1.3 4-519 P - 0.3 4-520 P - 7.6 4-521 P - 1.7 4-522 P - 14.9 4-523 P - 14.9 4-524 P - 12.3 4-525 P - 0.3 4-526 P - 0.3 4-527 p - 0.3 4-528 P - 14.9 4-529 P - 0.8 4-530 P 9.2 - 4-531 P - 4 4-532 P 5 - 4-533 P 1.3 - 4-534 P 1.3 - 4-535 P - 14.9 4-536 P - 5.1 4-537 P - 13.2 4-538 P - 5.1 4-539 P - 0.3 4-540 P - 3.1 4-541 P - 3.1 4-542 P - 13.2 4-543 P - 5.6 4-544 P - 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-48 Collier County SF Tlip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 64 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 . l'~' ..' . .... Trip Type ;#...., (P.C,:D;S) 4-545 P 4-546 P 4-548 P 4-549 P 4-551 P 4-552 P 4-553 P 4-554 P 4-556 P 4-557 P 4-558 P 4-559 P 4-560 P 4-562 P 4-563 P 4-564 P 4-565 P 4-566 P 4-567 P 4-569 P 4-570 P 4-571 P 4-572 P 4-573 P 4-574 P 4-575 P 4-576 P 4-577 P 4-578 P 4-579 P 4-581 P 4-582 P 4-583 P 4-585 P 4-586 P 4-587 P 4-589 P 4-590 P 4-592 P 4-593 P 4-595 P . Inoouna Assessable Trip -, . Length uutoouna Assessable Trip . Length 3.1 0.3 5 9.3 2.4 3.8 1.7 1.9 14.9 3.1 14.9 0.3 2.8 5 9.3 1.9 14.9 1.7 8.9 14.9 9.3 5.1 0.3 5.3 1.3 7.6 3.1 14.3 2 2.8 13.4 38 1.7 9.3 1.3 7.2 1.9 6.9 8 5 0.7 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-49 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 65 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 .]~~~~~t#(i;J;;.. ,"".,.,,',... " .. .. mDDuna.. ....... .... OU.I~ouna < Ttll1TWe AS,,!,s~..l>le.'I'rip .ASsells~bl~ 'Trip' (P,C;D,S) . <. Length' terigi~" . 4-596 P - 1.4 4-597 P - 1.4 4-598 P - 5 4-599 P - 7.8 4-601 P - 1.9 4-603 P - 0.7 4-604 P - 7.6 4-605 P - 3.1 4-606 P - 5 4-608 P - 0.3 4-609 P - 14.9 4-610 P - 0.3 4-611 P - 7.6 4-612 P - 0.3 4-613 P 0.7 - 4-614 P - 1.7 4-616 P - 3.9 4-617 P 14.9 - 4-618 P - 1.9 4-619 P - 0.3 4-620 P 2 - 4-621 P - 0.8 4-622 P - 6.8 4-623 P - 0.3 4-625 P - 10.6 4-626 P - 10.2 4-627 P - 4.8 4-628 P - 1.9 4-629 P - 9.8 4-631 P 9.2 - 4-632 P 6.5 - 4-634 P - 1.9 4-635 P 1.3 - 4-636 P 3.1 - 4-638 P 2.8 - 4-639 P - 4.1 4-640 P 1.1 - 4-641 P 6.5 - 4-642 P 1.1 - 4-644 P - 1.9 4-645 P 7.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-50 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 66 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ...... ... . .:. Inbound UUtDouna ..,....> ...... Trip Type' ,~ll~s~a~leTrip Assessable Trip I (P,C,D,S) .. .... . Length: .. . Length 4-646 p - 8.9 4-647 P - 14.9 4-648 P . 14.9 4-649 P 14.9 . 4-650 P 1.1 - 4-651 P 9.7 - 4-652 P . 0.7 4-653 P . 5.1 4-654 P - 14.9 4-655 P 14 - 4-656 P 4 . 4-657 P - 6.6 4-658 P 0.7 - 4-659 P - 1.7 4.660 P . 1.9 4-661 P - 14.9 4-662 P - 1.9 4-663 P - 0.8 4-665 P . 1.3 4-666 P . 7.1 4-667 P 12.3 - 4-668 P - 1.7 4-669 P 9.2 - 4-671 P . 10.1 4-672 P . 13.2 4-673 P 2 - 4-674 P 6.6 - 4-675 P . 3 4-676 P . 7.6 4-677 P - 1.3 4.678 P - 1.9 4-679 P - 13 4-680 P . 14.9 4-681 P . 4.7 4-682 P - 11.8 4.683 P 5 . 4-685 P - 5 4-686 P - 3.2 4.687 P . 3.1 4-688 P - 7 4-689 P 14.2 . 4-690 P . 7.6 4-691 P . 7.6 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A.51 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 67 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 . ....tii>O./i,;; ,;;'::/(:',,;:,;~;::::-;! ..,In.l>?lj~flt...; . ......t?ljt?Quna.. I "J"r11>,!"YP~ ':~~~~~.~blllTrip ',<\!l~~~~~~I~,r~i" (~.c,p,S) ...."Le'.;gtH!(';-..:.. . ,'Length 't. 4-692 P - 5.8 4-693 P 5 - 4-694 P - 1.7 4-695 P 14.2 - 4-696 P 3.1 - 4-697 P 12.7 - 4-698 P 2 - 4-699 P 5 - 4-700 P 0.3 - 4-701 P 0.3 - 4-702 P 0.3 - 4-703 P 14.9 - 4-704 P - 9.3 4-705 P - 5.1 4-706 P 12.7 - 4-707 P 7.7 - 4-708 P 0.7 - 4-709 P 5 - 4-710 P 3.1 - 4-711 P - 1.7 4-712 P - 5.1 4-715 P - 5.8 4-717 P - 1.9 4-718 P 7.7 - 4-719 P 1.1 - 4-720 P 7.7 - 4-722 P 3.1 - 4-723 P - 1.9 4-724 P 6.6 - 4-725 P 1.7 - 4-726 P 1.7 - 4-727 P 14 - 4-728 P - 14.9 4-729 P - 1.3 4-731 P - 1.9 4-732 P - 1.3 4-733 P 14.9 - 4-734 P - 1.3 4-735 P - 5.8 4-736 P - 1.9 4-737 P - 1.9 4-738 P 0.9 - 4-739 P 7.5 - 4-740 P 14 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-52 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 0.1\ February 10. 2009 Page 68 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 .>A........ .... . ...; ... ...'n~.ouna Uutoouna .......... Trip Type A.lIsefs~bleTrlp . AssessableTrlp .. (P,C.D,S) . :'. l.ength .. . Length' 4-741 p - 1.9 4-742 P - 0.7 4-744 P 1.2 - 4-745 P - 5.1 4-746 P - 1.3 4-747 P - 3.1 4-748 P - 8.9 4-749 P - 1.9 4-752 P 7 - 4-753 P 2 - 4-754 P 8.9 - 4-755 P 2 - 4-756 P 98 - 4-757 P 2 - 4-758 P 1.7 - 4-759 P 2.1 - 4-760 P 12.7 - 4-761 P 7.7 - 4-762 P 9.7 - 4-763 P 2 - 4-764 P - 9.1 4-766 P 5 - 4-767 P - 3.1 4-770 P - 5 4-771 P - 89 4-772 P - 14.9 4-773 P 8.7 - 4-774 P 6.9 - 4-775 P 14.9 - 4-776 P 14.9 - 4-777 P 12 - 4-778 P - 9.3 4-779 P - 1.9 4-780 P 7.5 - 4-782 P 7.2 - 4-783 P 5 - 4-784 P 11.4 - 4-785 P 2 - 4-788 P 0.7 - 4-789 P 2 - 4-790 P 14.9 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-53 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 69 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 - .j. __/jt/ .. - '~1>()9~at- ...... .:j........?u~~ou~a.... ..i:~S~~t~...{...... Trl~l'ype .As~~~~~leTrl" .... :ASse~.sable Trip' (P,C,D,S) . length "'leO.:!;: !"Length'. . 4-791 P - 5.1 4-792 P 7.7 - 4-793 P 6.5 - 4-794 P 3 - 4-796 P 8.3 - 4-797 P 6.1 - 4-798 P 14.9 - 4-799 P 3 - 4-800 P 2 - 4-801 P 1.7 - 4-802 P 8.9 - 4-803 P 5.8 - 4-804 P 14.9 - 4-806 P 5.8 - 4-807 P 7.2 - 4-808 P 7.7 - 4-809 P 7.7 - 4-810 P 11.6 - 4-811 P 2 - 4-812 P 5.8 - 4-813 P 1.7 - 4-814 P 5 - 4-815 P 9.2 - 4-816 P 5 - 4-817 P 6.7 - 4-818 P 1.7 - 4-819 P 9.2 - 4-820 P 6.7 - 4-821 P 2.1 - 4-821 P 8 - 4-822 P 3.1 - 4-823 P 5.8 - 4-824 P - 3.1 4-825 P 1.1 - 4-826 P 1.1 - 4-827 P 1.1 - 4-828 P 1.1 - 4-830 P 14.6 - 4-832 P 0.9 - 4-833 P 6.7 - 4-834 P 12 - 4-835 P 0.9 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-54 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 70 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 . .. ,"D"una .. .."'.~'Do~na . <<... ...... ..<>>............. I',. ..... Trill Type ASsessable Trip Asse~s~bleTrlp (";C,D,S) .. . Length ' Length' . 4-837 P 14.9 - 4-838 P 7.3 - 4-839 P 14.9 - 4-842 P 7.4 - 4-843 P 12 - 4-845 P - 6.5 4-846 P - 8.6 4-847 P 14.9 - 4-849 P 3.1 - 4-852 P 8.6 - 4-853 P 14.9 - 4-854 P 3.1 - 4-855 P 3 - 4-856 P 6.2 - 4-857 P 7.3 - 4-859 P 1.7 - 4-860 P 4.8 - 4-862 P 14.9 - 4-863 P 11.9 - 4-864 P 3.1 - 4-868 P 3.1 - 4-869 P 8.9 - 4-870 P 1.2 - 4-871 P 3.9 - 4-872 P 03 - 4-874 P - 03 4-875 P 2.3 - 4-877 P - 2.4 4-880 P 3.9 - 4-881 P 11.9 - 4-882 P - 0.3 4-883 P - 4 4-884 P - 6.3 4-885 P 7.3 - 4-886 P 3.1 - 4-887 P 2.5 - 4-888 P - 89 4-889 P 6.7 - 4-891 P 14.9 - 4-892 P 10.6 - 4-893 P 86 - 4-894 P 1.1 - 4-895 P 7.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study A-55 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 71 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 4-896 4-897 4-898 4-899 4-900 4-901 4-903 4-904 4-905 4-907 4-909 4-910 4-911 4-912 4-916 4-918 4-919 4-920 4-921 4-922 4-924 4-925 4-926 4-927 4-928 4-929 4-931 4-932 4-933 4-934 4-935 4-938 4-939 4-941 4-942 4-944 4-945 p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p , Inbound. Assessable Trip ., Length, , 2.5 14.4 6.7 10.5 1.1 3.9 UUtDound. .' Assessable Trip ': ;: c. Length: ': , , _.' ":;', Trip Type (P,C,D,S) 12.7 13.8 7.9 1.9 0.3 14.2 1.7 0.9 6 1.2 14.6 1.9 9.7 6.7 9.7 9.7 7.2 3.1 14 6.6 7.3 3.1 7.6 6.4 14.9 7.3 14.9 2 0.3 1.7 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-56 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 72 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 1< . , . . mDouna . Outbound. ':'r': ",., \, Trip Type Asse~sableJrip Assessable Trip .... (P,C,D,S) . " Lerigth' Length 4-946 p 0.3 - 4-947 P - 5.6 4-948 P 3.1 - 4-949 P 1.7 - 4-450 P - 69 4-951 P - 4.1 4-952 P 0.7 - 4-953 P 1.8 - 4-955 P 12.5 - 4-956 P 11.5 - 4-957 P 14.9 - 4-958 P 7.1 - 4-961 P 0.9 - 4-963 P 9.8 - 4-964 P 3.1 - 4-965 P 88 - 4-966 P 6.9 - 4-967 P 6.5 - 4-968 P 3.1 - 4-969 P 5.8 - 4-970 P 0.7 - 4-971 P 3.3 - 4-972 P 2 - 4-976 P 13.3 - 4-978 P - 14.9 4-979 P - 6.6 4-981 P - 5.8 4-982 P - 14.9 4-983 P - 9.3 4-984 P - 0.9 4-985 P - 1.1 4-987 P - 7.6 4-988 P 14.9 - 4-989 P - 1.9 4-990 P - 13.4 4-992 P 3.1 - 4-993 P - 0.9 4-994 P - 9.3 4-995 P - 0.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, fnc. May 2008 A-57 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 73 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 1;/ }i..;-;...., .c,. <.>","'::',..".,:. >.. moouna .. O~~ou.?,!> Trlp.IYpe A5!l"~""ble!rip Asse~~abl~rrip / r#Ci (PiC,D,S) Length"'. . Length 4-998 p - 3.1 4-999 P - 12.4 4-1000 P - 6.3 4-1003 P - 11.5 4-1004 P - 0.7 4-1005 P - 9.3 4-1006 P - 0.7 4-1007 P - 13.4 4-1008 P - 4.7 4-1009 P - 7.6 4-1010-1 P 3 - 4-1011-1 P 1.7 - 4-1012-1 P - 0.7 4-1013-1 P - 1.7 4-1014-1 P - 97 4-1015-1 P - 3.1 4-1016-1 P - 0.7 4-1017-1 P - 08 4-1019-1 P - 9.3 4-1010-2 P - 0.8 4-1011-2 P 3.1 - 4-1012-2 P - 14.2 4-1013-2 P - 7.6 4-1014-2 P - 5.4 4-1015-2 P - 0.8 4-1016-2 P - 0.8 4-1017-2 P 6.9 - 4-1018-2 P - 0.7 4-1019-2 P - 0.7 4-1020 P 4 - 4-1024 P 3 - 4-1025 P - 0.7 4-1027 P 14.9 - 4-1030 P - 4.3 4-1031 P - 1.7 4-1032 P - 3.9 4-1035 P - 6.1 4-1036 P - 4.1 4-1037 P 5.8 - 4-1039 P 13.8 - 4-1040 P - 14.9 4-1042 P - 14.9 4-1043 P - 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-58 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 74 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 , In~ound . . . .. uutooun.o I. Trip Type . f'ssessable Trip Assessable trIp Survey # . (P.C,D,S) "'I..er.gth .. Length . 4-1044 P - 7.7 4-1045 P - 5.1 4-1047 P - 2 4-1048 P - 1.9 4-1049 P - 2 4-1050 P - 7.6 4-1051 P - 7.6 4-1052 P - 8.2 4-1053 P - 8.9 4-1060 P - 6.2 4-1061 P - 1.9 4-1066 P - 6.4 4-1067 P - 2.1 4-1071 P - 149 4-1072 P - 2 4-1073 P - 9.8 4-1074 P - 9.8 4-1075 P - 9.7 4-1076 P - 3.1 4-1078 P - 3.9 4-1079 P 1.7 - 4-1080 P 4.8 - 4-1083 P - 8.8 4-1086 P 5 - 4-1088 P - 7.6 4-1089 P - 9.7 4-1090 P - 11.8 4-1091 P - 1.9 4-1092 P 14.9 - 4-1093 P - 1.9 4-1094 P 3.1 - 4-1095 P - 3.6 4-1096 P - 3.1 4-1097 P - 3.6 4-1098 P 19 - 4-1099 P - 4.3 4-1100 P - 5.8 4-1101 P - 2.1 4-1102 P - 7.6 4-1103 P - 14.9 4-1104 P - 0.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-59 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 75 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 I..........::i~~.~~l../::. ',:,,:":'<,<',::'::1, . i I~~?u~a. . .'. ~ut~~~rai '. I....s~iv~(:,;..i..: Trip Type Asse"~~~I~T[jp "Assessal>le'Trip 'if.:;" (P.C,D.S) . Length" ..' . .......Ti..ength.. 4-1105 p - 1.9 4-1106 p - 6.6 4-1107 p - 4.8 4-1108 p - 5.1 4-1109 P 14.9 - 4-1110 P 9.2 . 4-1111 P - 9.7 4-1112 P - 9.7 4-1113 P - 14.9 4.1114 p - 1.7 4-1115 P - 14.9 4-1116 P - 1.7 4-1118 P 14.9 - 4-1119 P - 2.1 4-1120 P - 1.9 4.1121 p - 6.6 4.1122 P - 1.9 4-1123 P - 4.8 4-1124 P - 76 4-1125 P - 14.9 4-1127 P - 1.7 4-1128 P - 69 4.1129 p - 12.7 4-1130 P . 66 4.1131 P 6.3 - 4.1133 P - 9.7 4-1134 P - 2.4 4-1135 P - 3.1 4-1137 P - 8.2 4-1138 P - 2.1 4.1139 p - 5.1 4-1140 P 1.7 . 4-1142 P 2 . 4-1144 P . 7.6 4-1145 P 14.9 . 4-1146 P 10.1 - 4-1148 P 14.9 - 4-1149 P 1.7 - 4-1150 P 2 - 4-1152 P 14.2 - 4-1153 P 6.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-60 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 76 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 1,><5/\ ,;'>,' ,In"o~n"" ,. ,OUIDouna , !ripType :As~s~,~bleTrip Assessable Trip '.'"...... (PiC,D,S) , .c, ,:''Length' .. . 'I..ength: 4-1154 p - 1.9 4-1155 P - 1.9 4-1156 p 2 - 4-1157 P 12.2 - 4-1159 P 2 - 4-1160 P 7.7 - 4-1161 P 3.9 - 4-1163 P - 3.1 4-1164 P - 12.4 4-1165 P - 39 4-1166 P - 8 4-1170 P 9.7 - 4-1171 P 5.8 - 4-1173 P - 2 4-1175 P - 6.2 4-1177 P - 1.9 4-1178 p - 0.7 4-1179 P - 3.1 4-1180 P - 5 4-1181 P - 2.8 4-1182 P 4.3 - 4-1183 P 2 - 4-1187 P - 4.8 4-1188 p - 51 4-1189 P - 1.9 4-1190 p - 14.5 4-1192 P - 14.9 4-1193 p 10.5 - 4-1194 P 14 - 4-1196 P - 1.9 4-1197 P - 13.6 4-1198 P 36 - 4-1199 P - 14.9 4-1200 P 11.6 - 4-1201 P - 6.7 4-1202 P - 2.8 4-1204 P - 1.3 4-1207 P - 10.9 4-1208 P 9.2 - 4-1209 P 2 - Tindale.Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-61 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 77 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 I.... ./Cr.i./T...r/..;.i..... -, ....,..,...., ".<m!>()~ra... . 9ut!>~ur~ i". IJ:~ .... Trip Type ~se"sableTrlP Asse~,!abl'; Tri" I.'i ... .(P,C,D,S). . iLel1gth .. .'. ... Length'S 4-1211 p 6.7 - 4-1212 P - 1.9 4-1214 P - 8 4-1216 P 2 - 4-1219 P - 2.6 4-1220 P - 14.7 4-1221 P - 1.9 4-1222 P - 14.9 4-1223 P - 4.8 4-1224 P - 8.9 4-1225 P - 1.9 4-1227 P - 14.4 4-1228 P - 2.1 4-1229 P 5 - 4-1230 P - 6.6 4-1231 P 2 - 4-1232 P 14 - 4-1233 P 1.1 - 4-1234 P 6.8 - 4-1235 P 9.7 - 4-1237 P 6.7 - 4-1238 P 13.7 - 4-1239 P 14 - 4-1242 P 3.1 - 4-1243 P - 6.4 4-1244 P - 9.7 4-1246 P - 8.9 4-1248 P 0.9 - 4-1249 P 9.4 - 4-1250 P 3.1 - 4-1251 P - 6 4-1252 P 14 - 4-1253 P 7.7 - 4-1254 P 14.8 - 4-1255 P 14 - 4-1256 P - 4.1 4-1257 P 0.7 - 4-1259 P 3.1 - 4-1264 P - 3.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-62 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 78 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 . '>>, >.. ,',,,DO,,,,O Outbourd, " ,Trill Type As~ess~bleTtlp Assessabl~Trlp Survey # , (P,CiD,SI ;.;,.:,.. ".. Length .. Length' ,. 4-1266 P 14.7 - 4-1267 P 2 - 4-1268 P 8.9 - 4-1269 P - 13.4 4-1270 P - 3.1 4-1271 P 2 - 4-1272 P - 6.6 4-1273 P 89 - 4-1274 P - 13.4 4-1275 P 14 - 4-1276 P 8.9 - 4-1278 P 14.9 - 4-1279 P 3.1 - 4-1281 P 14.9 - 4-1282 P - 6.5 4-1283 P - 3.1 4-1284 P - 6.4 4-1290 P - 7.6 4-1291 P - 5.1 4-1292 P - 12 4-1293 P - 13.5 4-1294 P 1,1 - 4-1295 P 2 - 4-1296 P - 3.1 4-1297 P - 1.1 4-1299 P - 3.1 4-1300 P - 10.9 4-1301 P - 9.6 4-1303 P 12.7 - 4-1305 P - 1.7 4-1306 P - 1.7 4-1308 P - 5.1 4-1310 P - 3.1 4-1311 P - 1.7 4-1312 P - 6.6 4-1313 P 3.1 - 4-1314 P - 66 4-1315 P - 4.7 4-1316 P - 4.8 4-1317 p - 3.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-63 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 79 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ........ ...., ..'.......,"'...'..,.Il'I:l<:'una..."... . ~UtDo~rya .. ii'1', ...........ii>... 'l'rl" Type,.!~s~Ssabl....!ri". ' ~~e~s~bl.~.!rip ,> (!"C,D,S)- "Length,: ,. , ., length'" 4-1318 p - 8.9 4-1319 P - 7.9 4-1320 P - 8.6 4-1321 P - 6.6 4-1324 P - 7.6 4-1325 P - 13.6 4-1326 P - 7.3 4-1327 P - 11.7 4-1328 P - 7.6 4-1330 P 1.7 - 4-1331 P - 7.6 4-1332 P - 5.1 4-1336 P - 5.1 4-1337 P - 3.1 4-1338 P - 13.8 4-1340 P - 5.8 4-1341 P 9.2 - 4-1342 P 14.9 - 4-1343 P - 4.3 4-1344 P - 3.1 4-1345 P - 0.7 4-1346 P 1.7 - 4-1348 P - 14.9 4-1349 P - 12.4 4-1350 P - 0.3 4-1351 P - 11.5 4-1352 P - 8 4-1353 P - 5.8 4-1355 P - 5.1 4-1356 P - 0.3 4-1357 P - 3.1 4-1358 P - 8,9 4-1360 P 1.7 - 4-1361 P - 0.3 4-1362 P - 14.9 4-1363 P - 5 4-1364 P - 5.1 4-1365 P - 12.3 4-1366 P - 8.9 4-1369 P - 5.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-64 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 80 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 "/"," InDOUna ' , .uUtDouna '. I ,'i",) Trip/Type ~ll!ls,sab!e Trip . As~es~~~I~,Trlp ':' (P,C,D,S) ,""'.':" Leijgth Length 4-1371 p - 2.1 4-1372 p - 6.6 4-1373 P - 13.4 4-1375 P - 1.7 4-1376 P - 13.5 4-1377 P - 1.9 4-1378 P - 7.4 4-1379 P - 8.9 4-1380 P - 9.3 4-1382 P 12 - 4-1383 P 2 - 4-1385 P - 14.9 4-1386 P - 1.7 4-1388 P 08 - 4-1389 P - 1.9 4-1390 P - 6.6 4-1391 P 7.7 - 4-1393 P 1 - 4-1394 P 6.7 - 4-1396 P - 8 4-1398 P 2 - 4-1400 P - 11.7 4-1402 P 13.3 - 4-1403 P 1.7 - 4-1405 P - 7.6 4-1406 P - 7.3 4-1409 p - 1.7 4-1411 P - 14.9 4-1412 P - 03 4-1413 p 7 - 4-1414 P 1 - 4-1415 P 03 - 4-1416 P - 3.1 4-1417 P 1.7 - 4-1418 P 3.1 - 4-1419 P 3.1 - 4-1420 P - 0.3 4-1421 p - 4.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-6S Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 81 of191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 I'i:.i' ,', Trlp]"~~e I"~olln<l ',.outllounct /i "';2~y~{\'/ ., Ass~ssableTrjp , As~.s~abl~~riP (P,C,D,S) Lerig\h ,',Le'ngih" ' 4-1422 P - 3.9 4-1423 P - 1.7 4-1424 P - 3.1 4-1425 P 3.9 - 4-1426 P - 3.1 4-1427 P - 1.9 4-1429 P 4.8 - 4-1431 P - 19 4-1432 P - 1.9 4-1433 P - 3.6 4-1434 P - 7 4-1435 P 9.7 - 4-1437 P - 6.4 4-1438 P - 14.3 4-1439 P - 1.7 4-1440 P - 0.3 4-1442 P - 0.3 4-1443 P - 1.9 4-1444 P - 5 4-1445 P - 5.1 4-1446 P - 19 4-1447 P - 6.6 4-1448 P - 149 4-1449 P - 4.8 4-1450 P - 9.8 4-1451 P - 10.1 4-1452 P - 13.8 4-1454 P 1.7 - 4-1455 P 5 - 4-1456 P 2 - 4-1457 P 1.7 - 4-1458 P 0.3 - 4-1459 P - 6.8 4-1460 P 5 - 4-1463 P 6 - 4-1465 P - 1.9 4-1467 P - 1.7 4-1468 P 1.7 - 4-1469 P - 5 4-1470 P - 12.7 4-1473 P - 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-66 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 82 of 191 Table A.4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 . .. . . ..' InDOUnD OU~bound ii.. ...... .. Trip Type jWses",able Trip .... Assessabl~Tfip (P,C,D,S) . . Length ' ., L.ngth." 4-1474 p - 14.9 4-1475 P - 7.6 4-1477 P - 5.1 4-1478 P - 14.3 4-1480 P - 12.4 4-1481 P - 1.9 4-1482 P - 0.8 4-1483 P - 7.6 4-1485 P 0.3 - 4-1486 P - 1.9 4-1487 P - 3.1 4-1488 P - 66 4-1489 P - 3.1 4-1490 P - 9.3 4-1491 P - 5.8 4-1492 P - 5.1 4-1493 P - 0.3 4-1494 P - 10.3 4-1495 P - 0.9 4-1496 P - 14.9 4-1497 P - 14 4-1498 P - 12.6 4-1499 P 6.5 - 4-1500 P 2 - 4-1501 P 6.5 - 4-1502 P 2.1 - 4-1504 P - 0.3 4-1505 P 1.7 - 4-1506 P 4 - 4-1507 P - 7.3 4-1508 P 2 - 4-1510 P 3.1 - 4-1511 P 7.7 - 4-1513 P 7.7 - 4-1515 P 12.7 - 4-1516 P - 6.6 4-1517 P 1.7 - 4-1518 P 9.1 - 4-1519 P 2 - 4-1522 P 5 - 4-1523 P - 1.9 4-1524 P - 1.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-67 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 83 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 --o' . -. . . . ' '''' Trip Type , :survey Ii, (P,C,D,S) 4-1525 4-1526 4-1527 4-1529 4-1530 4-1532 4-1533 4-1534 4-1535 4-1536 4-1537 4-1538 4-1539 4-1540 4-1541 4-1542 4-1543 4-1548 4-1549 4-1550 4-1551 4-1552 4-1553 4-1554 4-1555 4-1556 4-1559 4-1560 4-1561 4-1562 4-1563 4-1564 4-1565 4-1566 4-1568 4-1569 4-1570 4-1571 4-1572 4-1573 4-1574 4-1575 p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p . Inbound . Assessable Trip , , Length'" 12.7 2 8.2 9.7 OUtoouno . Assessable Trip "'<";':""':';<":'.,':'-:""':".:";"f.J,,::,,:...>":",::.:., .. Length " 14.9 14 1.7 1.9 1.9 3.1 11.8 14.9 3.1 1.9 9 2 7.6 8.9 3.1 6.7 14.9 14.9 14.9 1.9 5 14.9 13.5 5.8 2 2.1 14.9 2 8.2 2.2 2 2 7.7 1.9 6.4 6.6 5.7 5.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-68 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 84 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ... . InDOUna .. UUtDouna ......... ..<' Trip Typ~ Ass~ssab.le Trip Assessable Trip . SUrvey II ... (P,C.D,S) Length Length' 4-1576 p 7.9 - 4-1578 P - 3.1 4-1580 P 6.4 - 4-1581 P - 14.9 4-1582 P - 14.9 4-1583 P - 1.7 4-1584 P 89 - 4-1585 P 1.7 - 4-1586 P 1.1 - 4-1588 P 0.9 - 4-1590 P 7.7 - 4-1591 P 6.7 - 4-1592 P 6.7 - 4-1595 P - 2.1 4-1597 P - 7.9 4-1598 P - 6.6 4-1599 P - 69 4-1600 P 1.7 - 4-1601 P 14.9 - 4-1602 P 3.1 - 4-1603 P - 1.7 4-1605 P - 14.9 4-1608 P - 5.8 4-1609 P - 1.7 4-1610 P 3.1 - 4-1611 P - 6.6 4-1612 P - 1.7 4-1613 P 2 - 4-1614 P 1.7 - 4-1615 P 5 - 4-1616 P 3 - 4-1617 P 14 - 4-1618 P 14.9 - 4-1619 P - 14.9 4-1620 P - 9.3 4-1621 P 9.4 - 4-1622 P 1.7 - 4-1623 P - 12.3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-69 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 85 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ii;)~~~!~~: '. rrJ~T~~~ . ....m~()w'Cl.:) :"'.Jlilt~C)ul!a...... ..... ..... ;"c ............. ~s~~~~i~.Trip ...":!~.~..~llbl~T~ip (P.C.D.S) . . Lengtl't" . . Length'" 4-1625 p - 5.1 4-1626 P - 1.7 4-1627 P - 1.9 4-1628 P - 1.1 4-1629 P - 1.7 4-1630 P - 3.1 4-1631 P - 6.8 4-1635 P - 19 4-1636 P - 5 4-1637 P - 6.4 4-1638 P - 5.3 4-1640 P - 1.7 4-1641 P 9.7 - 4-1642 P - 3.1 4-1643 P - 7 4-1644 P - 1.9 4-1645 P - 5.1 4-1646 P - 14.9 4-1647 P 6.5 - 4-1648 P 1.7 - 4-1649 P 12.2 - 4-1650 P 5.6 - 4-1651 P - 2 4-1652 P 3.1 - 4-1653 P 9.7 - 4-1653-1 P 2.6 - 4-1654 P 14.9 - 4-1655 P - 6.4 4-1658 P - 1.9 4-1659 P 2 - 4-1660 P - 5.8 4-1661 P - 1.9 4-1662 P - 1.7 4-1665 P - 9.2 4-1666 P - 66 4-1667 P - 14.8 4-1669 P 2 - 4-1670 P 3.1 - 4-1671 P - 1.9 4-1672 P - 1.9 4-1673 P 2 - 4-1674 P - 1.7 4-1675 P - 13.5 T indale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-70 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 86 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 .,,' Trip T}'pe . ,lnDOUna " , . . ~u~"oun<l , :....it \ . Assessable Trip .' lU;,!"s~abl"Trlp ';. ,{PiC,D,S} Le!1l"!th ":Length,' 4-1676 p - 5 4-1677 P - 5 4-1678 P 6.9 - 4-1679 P 5 - 4-1680 P - 14.3 4-1683 P - 10.3 4-1684 P - 6.4 4-1685 P - 5.1 4-1686 P - 1.9 4-1687 P - 13.4 4-1688 P - 13.4 4-1689 P - 6.9 4-1690 P - 1.7 4-1691 P - 1.7 4-1692 P - 4.8 4-1693 P - 13.4 4-1694 P 8.9 - 4-1696 P 14 - 4-1697 P 4.9 - 4-1698 P 14.9 - 4-1699 P 5.6 - 4-1700 P 9.7 - 4-1701 P 1.1 - 4-1702 P - 13.4 4-1703 P - 8.9 4-1704 P 14.4 - 4-1705 P 6.9 - 4-1706 P 2 - 4-1707 P - 0.9 4-1709 P - 9.3 4-1710 P - 0.9 4-1711 P - 0.9 4-1712 P - 12 4-1713 P - 88 4-1714 P - 3.2 4-1715 P - 9.3 4-1716 P 14.6 - 4-1717 P 5.8 - 4-1722 P - 5.8 4-1723 P 13.8 - 4-1724 P - 14.9 4-1725 P - 14.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc. May 2008 A-71 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 87 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ...i.Y, ...........;..jj.... ",,;::':-:::::':'i'o .. '!rioOUndi. ....OUt~Ou~o/ I" .. '.F .... T~i~*.Yil~. ,..,.~e~~~I:lI~Tri p ..,., Asses!'fal:ll.~1"rip I.,. ..... (P,C,D,S)' : .....L"i,gth....'Y........ . L..i,glh 4-1727 p - 12.9 4-1728 P 5.6 - 4-1729 P - 3.2 4-1730 p - 14.9 4-1733 P - 7 4-1734 P - 5.3 4-1735 p - 1.2 4-1736 p - 7 4-1737 P - 0.7 4-1738 P - 13.6 4-1740 P 1.2 - 4-1741 P 14 - 4-1743 P - 14.9 4-1745 P - 0.9 4-1746 P - 14.9 4-1747 P - 6.5 4-1749 P - 3.1 4-1751 P 5.8 - 4-1752 P 8.1 - 4-1753 P 7.6 - 4-1754 P 4.1 - 4-1755 P 1.2 - 4-1756 P - 9.4 4-1757 P - 0.7 4-1758 P - 10.6 4-1759 p - 6.1 4-1760 P - 13.2 4-1761 p - 1.3 4-1762 P - 14.9 4-1763 P - 0.7 4-1764 P - 7.6 4-1765 P - 3.1 4-1769 P - 14.9 4-1770 p - 1.9 4-1771 P 14.1 - 4-1772 P - 8.8 4-1773 P - 5.8 4-1777 P - 1.1 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-72 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 88 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 .' ."" I~Douna , ',' vu..,oun., . "....ua"..i Trip Type .' Assessable'Trip Assessable Trip (P;C.D.S) , l..ength 'Length " , 4-1778 P - 10.6 4-1779 P 14.9 - 4-1780 P - 7.8 4-1781 P - 31 4-1782 p - 5.1 4-1783 P - 5.2 4-1784 P - 5.1 4-1785 P - 6.5 4-1787 p 1.7 - 4-1788 P 9.5 - 4-1789 P 14.9 - 4-1790 p 10.5 - 4-1791 P 5 - 4-1792 P 4.1 - 4-1794 P - 14.6 4-1795 P - 14.9 4-1796 P 14.9 - 4-1797 P 5 - 4-1798 P 11.7 - 4-1799 P 4.9 - 4-1800 P 2 - 4-1801 P 7 - 4-1802 P - 4 4-1803 P - 5.1 4-1804 P - 8.9 4-1805 P 5 - 4-1806 P 8.5 - 4-1807 P - 14.9 4-1808 P - 3.1 4-1809 P - 14.9 4-1811 P - 14.3 4-1812 P - 6.6 4-1813 p - 5.2 4-1814 P - 5.2 4-1815 P - 5.2 4-1816 P 4.9 - 4-1817 P 7.5 - 4-1818 P - 1.9 4-1819 P - 12.1 4-1821 P - 12 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-73 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 89 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 ,.....ijjl;~:.~;iu.~<",. :,,,:,,-,:,{,-,;":,'i_- " Inbo~nd" ,'. ()utbOU~d.. !ti~lYI'~ AssessableTrlp .",,~es~a~le Trip (P,C;O,S) V'..d;....:.::..",_"...""..".:_.,..\t.-", '," Length! Lengt".' 4-1822 p - 4.3 4-1823 P - 3.1 4-1824 P - 14.9 4-1825 P - 6.6 4-1826 P - 5.8 4-1827 P 9 - 4-1828 P 10.3 - 4-1829 P 1.9 - 4-1830 P 7.7 - 4-1831 P 14.9 - 4-1832 P 14.9 - 4-1833 P 6.9 - 4-1834 P - 4.1 4-1835 P - 4.7 4-1836 P 2 - 4-1837 P 4.1 - 4-1838 P 5 - 4-1841 P - 13.4 4-1842 P 5.8 - 4-1843 P - 5.8 4-1845 P 5 - 4-1846 P - 6.8 4-1847 P - 1.9 4-1848 P - 2.2 4-1852 P - 7.9 4-1853 P - 2.2 4-1854 P - 3.1 4-1855 P - 7.9 4-1857 P - 1.9 4-1858 P - 7.3 4-1859 P 9.7 - 4-1861 P - 11 4-1862 P 2 - 4-1863 P 5 - 4-1864 P 9.9 - 4-1865 P 4.9 - 4-1866 P 9.7 - 4-1867 P 6.5 - 4-1869 P 2.1 - 4-1871 P 5 - 4-1872 P 12.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-74 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 90 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 >. " ,,' " ,In!,o~~a ." UU'DDuna i",,; "'\;"; TrfpType Assess~~18Trip A!lsess"bl~ Trip (P,C;D,S) . Length' " Length 4-1873 p 2 - 4-1874 P 2 - 4-1875 P 6.2 - 4-1878 P 8.9 - 4-1890 P 11.2 - 4-1891 P 2.1 - 4-1892 P 11.6 - 4-1893 P 9.3 - 4-1894 P 1.1 - 4-1895 P 1.7 - 4-1896 P 3.1 - 4-1897 P 4.8 - 4-1898 P 7.9 - 4-1899 P 2 - 4-1900 P 3.1 - 4-1901 P 2 - 4-1902 P 13.3 - 4-1905 P 8.6 - 4-1906 P 3 - 4-1907 P 2 - 4-1909 P 14.9 - 4-1910 P - 1.9 4-1912 P - 14.9 4-1914 P 14.9 - 4-1915 P 3 - 4-1916 P - 13.4 4-1918 P 14.9 - 4-1920 P 39 - 4-1922 P 81 - 4-1925 P 3.1 - 4-1926 P 14 - 4-1928 P 3.1 - 4-1929 P 5 - 4-1930 P 2.1 - 4-1931 P 1.1 - 4-1932 P 73 - 4-1933 P - 7.6 4-1934 P 3 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-75 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 91 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 "',ii,'"",, ':~,~;~2!;{ .'fripType > < 'y ~'" (P,C,D,S) . 4-1935 P 4-1936 P 4-1937 P 4-1939 P 4-1942 P 4-1943 P 4-1944 P 4-1945 P 4-1946 P 4-1947 P 4-1948 P 4-1949 P 4-1950 P 4.1953 P 4-1954 P 4-1955 P 4-1956 P 4-1957 P 4.1958 P 4-1959 P 4-1960 P 4-1961 P 4-1962 P 4-1963 P 4-1966 P 4-1967 P 4-1968 P 4-1969 P 4-1970 P 4-1972 P 4-1973 P 4-1974 P 4-1975 P 4-1976 P 4-1977 P 4-1978 P 4-1979 P 4-1981 P , InDOuna . A5~essable Trip Length 4.8 2 13.3 8.3 8.1 9.7 5 10.6 5 5.8 7.8 13.8 14.9 . \JutDouna" , ;' Assessable Trip ..'u..,..."....",,;...:.:..,.,....' .. Length 14.9 2.2 13.1 1.9 4.8 10.7 1.1 1.1 5.8 5.8 9.5 8.2 13 5.8 9 13.3 5 4.8 14.9 7 8.9 3 9.2 1.2 12.8 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-76 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 92 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 " .', '..', ",:"'::,': ' ,lnI>Ou.na vutoo"no' . .'.... >........,.'......'u ,< IripType ~~~~abl,!rlp As""ssablll...dp (P,C,D,S) Length ... Length 4-192 p 12.7 - 4-1983 p 3 - 4-1984 P 13.6 - 4-1985 P 12.8 - 4-1986 P 5 - 4-1988 P 5 - 4-1989 P 2 - 4-1990 P 6.9 - 4-1992 P 10.6 - 4-1994 P 3 - 4-1995 P 5.1 - 4-1996 P 4.9 - 4-1997 P 4.8 - 4-1998 P 7.7 - 4-1999 P 9.7 - 4-2000 P 11.2 - 4-2001 P 7.3 - 4-2002 P 9.5 - 4-2003 p 1.7 - 4-2004 P 1.1 - 4-2005 P 3 - 4-2006 P 0.6 - 4-2008 p 6 - 4-2009 P 14.9 - 4-2010 P 36 - 4-2011 P 9.7 - 4-2012 P 6.6 - 4-2013 P 12.7 - 4-2014 P 97 - 4-2015 P - 0.7 4-2017 P - 13.5 4-2018 P - 14.9 4-2019 P - 1.9 4-2020 P - 9.7 4-2021 P 14.9 - 4-2022 P 7.7 - 4-2023 P 96 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-77 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10. 2009 Page 93 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip Length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family Land Use - Site 4 li';;;g~~~ff~~,;!'. t.ripTyp~ ,..lnbQu.lld. ...<()ut~QUnd,. ,..~.S!'~~~bl~.Trlp /As~~~lIb'e,Trip (1".C:;D,5) . Length ... . Length .. 4-2024 P 5.1 - 4-2025 P 7.7 - 4-2026 P 7.7 - 4-2027 P 6.2 - 4-2028 P 14.7 - 4-2029 P 14.7 - 4-2031 P 1.3 - 4-2032 P 1.1 - 4-2033 P 7.2 - 4-2034 P 2.8 - 4-2035 P - 9.3 4-2037 P - 9.5 4-2038 P - 1.9 4-2040 P 14.8 - 4-2041 P 8.6 - 4-2042 P 14.9 - 4-2043 P 8 - 4-2045 P 3.1 - 4-2048 P 8 - 4-2049 P 4.4 - 4-2050 P 3.3 - 4-2051 P 4.1 - 4-2052 P 14.9 - 4-2053 P - 3.6 4-2055 P 83 - 4-2056 P 8.9 - 4-2057 P 8.6 - 4-2059 P - 13.4 4-2060 P 7.7 - 4-2061 P 3 - 4-2062 P 9.2 - 4-2063 P - 1.8 4-2065 P - 14.9 4-2066 P - 5 4-2067 P 6.7 - 4-2069 P 14.9 - 4-2070 P 7.7 - 4-2071 P 14.1 - 4-2072 P 1.3 - 4-2073 P 7.3 - 4-2074 P 9.7 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-78 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 94 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 "" :,2Uu~ <i rrlpType ' ,lnDouna uu~oun... AssessableTrlp Asse~~,~bl~ Trip "",,,..~, '." {P,C,D,sl Length' i ,.......,... Length ' 4-2075 P 8.8 - 4-2076 P 2 - 4-2078 P 4.9 - 4-2079 P 6.8 - 4-2080 P - 10.6 4-2081 P - 9.4 4-2082 P - 5.3 4-2083 P 1.3 - 4-2084 P - 32 4-2085 P 13.4 - 4-2086 P 6.1 - 4--2087 P 14.9 - 4-2088 P 5 - 4-2090 P - 14.9 4-2091 P - 1.9 4-2092 P - 5.1 4-2093 P - 5.9 4-2094 P 14.9 - 4-2095 P 10.7 - 4-2096 P - 1.9 4-2097 P 8.6 - 4-2099 P 8.3 - 4-2101 P 6.5 - 4-2102 P 14.6 - 4-2105 P - 5.9 4-2106 P 10.3 - 4-2107 P 5 - 4-2108 P - 1.9 4-2109 P 4.1 - 4-2110 P - 14.9 4-2111 P - 14.9 4-2112 P 14.9 - 4-2113 P 10.6 - 4-2115 P 2.1 - 4-2116 P 6.9 - 4-2117 P 1.1 - 4-2118 P - 9.1 4-2119 P - 14.3 4-2120 P - 11.3 4-2121 P - 5.1 4-2123 P - 5 4-2124 P 4.9 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-79 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 95 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 ,i",i;' ii(-" ,.... <'~Dound i " 'i"i"''!t~(),,!~d. ~)X'0i 'i' (. rdpType ~sei~~~~I~1'IR J\!;s~~~~b!~ TrIp. ,"..,.......,,,..........',.i (P,C;D,S) Length";' . ~.:'" ,'i.;>'L~ngth' . 4-2127 P 7.7 - 4-2128 P - 4 4-2129 P 5 - 4-2130 P 3.1 - 4-2131 P 13.8 - 4-2132 P 13.8 - 4-2133 P - 1.7 4-2134 P - 5 4-2135 P 9.4 - 4-2136 P - 5.1 4-2137 P - 5.1 4-2138 P - 0.8 4-2139 P 14.9 - 4-2140 P 5 - 4-2142 P - 3.1 4-2143 P 9.2 - 4-2145 P 13 - 4-2146 P - 2.2 4-2147 P - 1.9 4-2148 P 2 - 4-2149 P 5.1 - 4-2150 P 9.7 - 4-2151 P - 8.9 4-2152 P 5 - 4-2153 P - 7.1 4-2154 P 4.9 - 4-2157 P 14.9 - 4-2158 P 5 - 4-2159 P 9.8 - 4-2160 P 1.7 - 4-2161 P 3 - 4-2162 P - 0,7 4-2163 p 1.1 - 4-2164 P 14.9 - 4-2165 P 2 - 4-2166 P 14.8 - Tindale-otiver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-80 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 96 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 "".'( " ,'" mDouna "'" .,(. ,."UtDOU~a, """ ,~;i' i/i Trll!rrpe Ass~ssableTrlJ> ' "';~e~~~bleTrlp (P,C,D,S) """-"Length'''i ." .,....,. Length 4-2168 p - 0.7 4-2169 P - 9.5 4-2170 P - 13.6 4-2171 P 5 - 4-2173 P 3 - 4-2174 P 5 - 4-2176 P - 5 4-2177 P - 4.1 4-2178 P - 5.6 4-2179 P 1.7 - 4-2180 P 9.7 - 4-2181 P 9.1 - 4-2182 P - 3.4 4-2183 p - 6.6 4-2184 P - 5.1 4-2185 P - 3.1 4-2188 P 1.1 - 4-2189 P 14.6 - 4-2190 P 14.6 - 4-2191 P 3 - 4-2192 P 5.8 - 4-2193 P 13.6 - 4-2194 P 97 - 4-2196 P 12 - 4-2198 P - 7.6 4-2199 P 5 - 4-2200 P 1 .. 4-2201 P - 11.5 4-2202 P 1.3 - 4-2203 P 2 - 4-2205 P 7.6 - 4-2206 P 51 - 4-2207 P .. 5.1 4-2208 P .. 1.7 4-2209 P 3.8 - 4-2210 P 5.7 - 4-2211 P 0.7 - 4-2212 P 8.1 .. 4-2213 P 5 - Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-8! Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 97 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 .iiii'~~~~~~\i'i.r~~~ii 4-2214 P 4-2217 P 4-2218 P 4-2219 P 4-2220 P 4-2221 P 4-2222 P 4-2223 P 4-2224 P 4-2225 P 4-2226 P 4-2227 P 4-2228 P 4-2229 P 4-2230 P 4-2231 P 4-2232 P 4-2233 P 4-2234 P 4-2235 P 4-2236 P 4-2237 P 4-2238 P 4-2239 P 4-2240 P 4-2241 P 4-2242 P 4-2243 P 4-2244 P 4-2245 P 4-2246 P 4-2247 P 4-2248 P 4-2249 P 4-2250 P 4-2251 P 4-2252 P 4-2253 P 4-2254 P InboU~d " Assessable Trip , Length.., 1.1 102 3 14.9 14.9 8.6 6.2 3.1 5.1 3.1 7.8 uutbounCl . Asses~~ble T~!, .. 'Length ". 5.5 14.9 4.9 2 2.1 2.5 1.1 2 1.7 14.9 1.9 1.9 7.6 9.1 4.9 14.9 4.9 5 9.6 8 5.1 14.7 7.9 7 13.5 10.3 2.6 6.6 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-82 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 98 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 , moou.na .,,'!toouno , . ", Trip typ" .ASsessable Trip AssessabJeTrlp ~urvey # ", ..."..,......,,'......_.., .. (P,C;D,S) Le~gth Length 4-2255 p - 5.1 4-2256 P - 1.9 4-2257 p - 9.8 4-2258 P - 2.2 4-2259 P - 1.9 4-2260 P - 3.1 4-2261 P 12.7 - 4-2262 P - 5.2 4-2263 P - 5.2 4-2264 P 1.3 - 4-2265 P 3.1 - 4-2266 P 14.9 - 4-2268 P - 9.3 4-2269 p - 14.9 4-2271 P 5.8 - 4-2272 P - 1.9 4-2273 P 14.3 - 4-2274 P - 7.3 4-2275 P - 14.9 4-2276 P - 10.7 4-2277 P 12.3 - 4-2278 P - 6.6 4-2279 P 14.9 - 4-2280 P 14.9 - 4-2281 P 92 - 4-2282 P - 2.6 4-2283 P - 1.9 4-2284 P 5 - 4-2285 P - 5 4-2288 P 7.4 - 4-2289 P 14.9 - 4-2290 P - 19 4-2293 P - 2.2 4-2295 P 12.7 - 4-2296 P - 12.9 4-2297 P 3.1 - 4-2298 P 7.7 - 4-2299 P 1.7 - 4-2300 P - 1.9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-83 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 99 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 I.... Y;i;;i.?~# ......;. ..' .,In~~~nd. .... ..,.. ....... , 9utbound. Trlp']"yptl, ASsessable Trip . ,(ssessa~le']"rip ,1;',:.':',"::' ~,",:: "..:',.,', c"..'" . (P,C.D,S) ,'. Length?' Length 4-2302 p 5 - 4-2303 P 7.9 - 4-2304 P - 5 4-2305 P 5 - 4-2307 P 7.7 - 4-2308 P 6.7 - 4-2310 P 7.9 - 4-2312 P 10.1 - 4-2313 P 9.2 - 4-2314 P 5 - 4-2315 P - 6.4 4-2316 P - 10.7 4-2317 P 2.1 - 4-2318 P 5.1 - 4-2319 P - 5 4-2320 P 5 - 4-2322 P - 8 4-2323 P - 0.9 4-2325 P 9.2 - 4-2327 P 1.1 - 4-2328 P 1.3 - 4-2329 P 2 - 4-2330 P 1.3 - 4-2331 P 5.1 - 4-2332 P 1.1 - 4-2333 P - 1.4 4-2334 P 14.9 - 4-2335 P 6.7 - 4-2336 P - 5.6 4-2337 P - 2 4-2338 P 3.1 - 4-2340 P 92 - 4-2341 P 9 - 4-2343 P - 14.7 4-2344 P - 8.9 4-2345 P - 5 4-2346 P 1.1 - 4-2347 P - 09 4-2348 P - 12.3 4-2350 P 3 - Tindale~01iver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-84 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 100 of 191 Table A-4 (continued) Trip length and Percent New Trips Statistical Analysis Single Family land Use - Site 4 T' L th S rip engl ummary: .' ,< ..,.. ".Assessalll. Trip Lengtb Average 6.55 Standard Deviation 4.66 AveraQe + 3cr 20.52 Averaae - 30" 0.00 Coefficient of Variation 0.711 Count of Assessable Trio Ends 1,949 Trip Type Summary: T;do Type COunt '. % of Total ."'. Primary Trips 1,949 100% Diverted Trips 0 0% Secondary Trips 0 0% Captured Trips 0 0% Total Surveys. 1,949 - % New Trips of Total Surveys: 100% Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc. May 2008 A-8S Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study <(cn~ OOOl __.O~ 'J_ .0 ,~ E':S 2com - :"" ~1s~ e'" ",Ll- OJ <{ - c: QI E QI ... :J C'" QI 0:: QI .!:! l/) QI C. 't;>E <l:ca Qll/) , .QUI ca I- UI >- lii c: <I: .... =, " a"~ Q.\,= .::-.~ ="'" =-= =: s "U .~.~ '" . Q,l= -'" ""- S .. .. '" = .5iJJ.. ... <0 " t:: :?Jr.< ... <0 .~- .,.,', ... .! ... ... <0 " ... :?J~ .'0.... ~. = =.,. 'I""-F' O'>.NOO......... S~N\C V)~Nt- ~o-.\O~ ~~::~ IIJ =_ =::C "0 ,..,..,..,........... Q,l = = C. ......... ....n .....1' .tj~-:~ ~~~~ r.= .S!: Cl.l =- ~.-:. .-:. .-:. .... ~ IIJ.C .---- ""<Eo< 8?-. :-::- TI.l "= ...., Cl.l "CI - .:: - d -"c :.~ ; .. s =p=.!3- U;.'" .:: ... o ... ... W .... o c: Cl ... CO :.E ... " " -= :.= a '" = z "'..,. N => -- V)("f'"')V).- .- N ("f'"') ~ '" ..,. "'. 0) c. s ~ ~ ~ 4- o e .~ '" .~ 0) ." ." ~ ~ ." C ."l ~ 0) -5 0) ij 0) ." '" C o u ?f- o 0, '" .~ .~ ]3 ~ 0) ~ .~ ~ d ;;.. ~N 0) c S 0 11)'';:; 0..]; ~ '.8 r/l .~ O)Q -=-; Eg ." 0 .:JZ '> ~ ::01= Q: c .~ .~ ~ > 4- o " 0) ;Q 4: 0) .. 0 a3u -0 z,..; >,>' ,,'" ~ .8 00/> ~ .g ~ CJl -0 'C u~ ~ ~ ~ -" u "- .!:: [-< "" 0/> .~ -;:; > 2 ,~>-> 0\ ~ x ,;:2 ~ ~ ~ c;......... "' _ ~ UUi.8t;.....;--t5 -- o~ -;~ II g~~g'E ~~ ;z;~~o"OB~: ~, Ci..~:!:~::s :i N ce E 0 6 1l).5 ~~cceCO~..55 5....~~"E"o~1-;2 ~~~~~~<n~~ -B ~.8 E ~ ~'2..3.!:;i >-> C r/l ~ ~ ~'s 0. g. .D .g '; 0 C 0 -; ~ ~ "B ,;:;:"'5 cbJ)';=; tl ......... .... (Il ....""'::: -o.cg:s ~ g;' t: 'Uj ~ E c: 11) ~~~p 8.,~8~~ u E :.2 ~:: ~ tfJ I-; 0 8 ,:!Z 11) t- i::! _ ~ u 'w -5 L.... ce:::::;::::'2 '"0 c~~_.---- 0011) 11) '-- 0 IS - ~ .~~ u ~ ~ Sgt[/)~~l1)ce:::: ~ u 11) '11) - ~ r/l 0 ,- Il) ~ tJ,4 t:; g t- 9-l u ::l....c: -::l ce .....5 ar ~.s g [/) ,... ~'5 ~ l-; ,- e.o "fi ~ ~ l.f) ar '"0 ~ u E ~ > c: - ;:.~ 'Vi ~ ~ ~ ~ co ,:: 11) 11) ~ a:.---- .9- ,:: x 0 c:.....c:....:::::s:.b~:.::< E ~ ,;:2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ce ~ 11),~ 11) I-; e i;:l V':l tfJ"'tJ,4 u.J t:: C: .s 0 0.. 5- "'T11)~"'OOI1)I-;r;,/)o.u ~..... -B-"EoE<u ~ "'N ;; I-; _ ~ 0. '--' ce "-0 00 ..l: 0) -" f-< N ,.; -i ] '" 2 ~ 'u o ~ ~ <{ <<J ~ 0) .:: q~ 0)0 l~~ <l:Q)~ 000> ~O~ N_ O - 0 ZON ~O E >.~ 2ma.> -"m rn ~ rn '0.00. c'" ",LL m <l: .. .. ~ :> o .c -'< ~ " c. OJ) c 'in :> '0 " E c'2 " u ~ ~ ~ '0 " ~ E ~ c ~ .2 g e u " " " c " :.E bi.l u c. d ~"5 o E >. .~ >-':-::: ";; te te :.a'"C"'O ..6:;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ - ~ " bl} [,/'; ..0 0 .S ~ r.r. - =..c.9- ~ ~ g .:: .~ "'011.).2:'0 2~.g ~ a.1;2 ~..o ~.~ 4-.] .2:~~"O t:..Q- u':;: !=:,~..o ~ 'iI) - E Vl "'0 bl} =' t'O ~.g ::: ~ u :::3 d,) Cl.. 2 '"0 ~'c ~]~.; 8 .g ~ ";;j ~ t::~~ o v ~ 'fJ t; t; "'0 0 ..0 "'0 - b1 ~ Vl .s 5 Cl:l .s t; c :s u :3 "B ~ ~ "9- .2:' t:: :; ~. U._ [fJ .~ 0 1:: E - >, :> ~ v ~ 8 'Vi t -a c; ~ 0... a :::l o Qj 0 :: l-. ..c l- ~ 0;-.06 >,>, c5 :> - 0'" u ~ l-. '_~ ~1ii "0 'E U-u ~ ~ '" .c U c. .~ f-; "- '" ~ ra E E ;:, CIl (l) Gl ... , ra <C a:: ~ l: .Q 0 ... ra :ij ill ~ ~ 2F l- ra " 0 0 ... " 'T 0'. 00 Gl " 00 00 00 l: ~ Gl C) C- o;: '-'~,: I- .~ ::l " ::l "l., '0 '0 '0 rI.:I\', .. Q.'. :=0 J.j< 00 t'- ",.>. 00 'T .", '5 ] 'E " ~ " " aJ ::2 '0 :g ~ '0;; ~ " " '" ~ ~ ~ ... = .. 6. N M is'.\ .1< .1< B Ol Vl Vi Vl .. " ~' <"- 00 -': ~~~ - N,.., ~~~ u .s ~. " ~ 'u o ~ ~ <( 0<1 ~ " .:: 000 a;8 "N '0 >, " ~ If,:; ;'E Table A-7 Percent New Trips Summary -;":~<: Site ,:~( ',.',nV>?y",/:i\{' Reference Site 1(1) Site 2") Site 3(31 Site4,4j Total: Land Use: Single Famil Residential,i + Dwelling', Weighted%> <,._",>' ',', ",/::';'t">"",,,,,-,,;;:;:<:,\ , Units ,i: New Trips" 74 74 42 42 315 315 97 97 528 528 100% 100% 100% 100% 'Vcighted A\cragc IXI New Trips: 100%. * Weighted Percent new trips = percent new trips x dwelling units ** Weighted Percent new trip = percent new trips x size (1,000 sf) (1) Source: Table A-I, Trip Type Summary (2) Source: Table A-2, Trip Type Summary (3) Source: Table A-3, Trip Type Summary (4) Source: Table A-4, Trip Type Summary Table A-S Trip length Summary Land Use: Single Family Residential. .. .. Site ~verage Asse~sable Dwelling Weighte~ Trip Reference Trip Length Units Lengths* Site 1(1) 3.05 74 225.70 Site 2'2) 10.98 42 461.16 Site 3(J) 11.29 97 1,095.13 Site 4(3) 6.55 315 2,063.25 Total: 528 3,845.24 Weighted Avcrage Trip Length**: 1.28 . Weighted Trip Length ~ Avg. assessable trip length x dwelling units .. Weighted Trip Length ~ A vg. assessable trip length x size (1,000 sf) (1) Source: Table A-I, Trip Length Summary (2) Source: Table A-2, Trip Length Summary (3) Source: Table A-3, Trip Length Summary (4) Source: Table A-4, Trip Length Summary Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 103 of 191 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 A-S8 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study APPENDIX B Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 104 of 191 Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 105 of 191 Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 19 years. Data from these studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S. The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for non- residential land uses. The trip length infonnation is obtained through origin-destination surveys that ask respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip length by land use. The percent new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origin-destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The percent new trip variable is then calculated as I minus the percentage of trips that are captured. TOA has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact Fees, ITE Journal, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies. As discussed previously, the trip characteristics data collected for the 1999 and 2008 Collier study sites were blended with the studies in the Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database. Table B-1 Single Family Detached Housing (ITE lUC 210) - 2008 Collier County Studies Only j,O<otiOD Size I Unit. .". fotnl# #TripL'DlIlb lntor,.;.... In',,,viow. (\.,.,,"f'<..1"I " M".O' 5"' Coll.""".FI " Mot"" 51) ('"t1;" c", FL 31' Mo,."' '.'" '-"ll"'l'o,rL " M.u.'" ,,, loWS,,,, \" TripGe" Itole l'irneP..-iod ['Tip l.enwh r."."'JIi...Trip' VMT iiour.. 1 ~." 7""1' , 0' '" 7,-"l' ",' (,'" ,,,."\' {..,' ".~\ 7._Op "'," .\"" Tn I~ th. 1,'" W. ,""'.~"" .hi I.. UK ",'A "'A ,'iA ~IA '"07 r;"d.k_"h,',",<,,,,,~,,,,,, 1",1' T",,,,,,,_<>I,,..,.&,''",,,-,'''' <'oM '",""<_f)h,~~"'""",-"" "'...., li""'~_"i",,,"A,~,,,".. '" W'i'";;,,:::;; ~~',~:n:.~;:" ",,:.. i2Ji'k 'C;C'~(~_,~'~i,'.<,,;';.~ ^v...""V~T ".IB w..,"h,," M..."" v\f1 ",-11-4 MoU"n\",lT '"..W Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 B-1 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 106 of 191 Table B-2 Single Family Detached Housing (ITE lUC 210) - 1999 and 2008 Collier County Studies Only LOOItlOD Su~IUnll$ D~tt Jutal ~ # Trll'Lengtb TripGen Time Period Trip P""'eIIfN"..Trlps VMY Source Int"""'.., ]nt."'i...... ''', Lengtb C"lhed" H " I"-~-'J<) ." ".~" ".I,p II.'" W^ I._'.~, rmdHl"UllVC' &A'~":l.'" (""llle,('" " .." Ih_'J~ '" '.[, ",.op 1,40 '''A 4'1 ~: 11"u.k-()I1\'<f&A,~><.."" ['''11..,('" .. " MM_"" 5!1l leif 1,_"p , r,~ NiA ,"m [,udni<-')I,,,,,,,^,,,,,U1'<> ,."II.,d, H " ~.. ~ll <7~ ',-or 11.2'1 W^ 1"),]) rm""I<,-Oli."'I<:^,.."",,,, C"ll"~(,, 'c -'I, M<lr-(j! 1'47 ,;')7 '''-/'p h." 'JIA 4'(,' rm,",k~(1h"'7& ^'~""'<> C"JI",r" n " M",_U~ ", "-jj ;._f,p 11l.'Il-' NI^ 1"..SO ['","'k"O]'"",",^"","".. 1,,,"1.'>,,. I,Uj~ ^- .r.t Leath; ,.. ," . .tedA.. ., 0, ,~ ~ "~!l1"c'" W"~blo.jA\""'~'lnp'"'"<""'''''k.o'.,~_,",,_.8.!11 lTFA,..,g'lnpG."""'l"'" 1<.0,. ~.'j7 Av"""eVMT 1'11.76 \\'.,!b"dAv""'~'VMT (,c,ll M"I"mYMT N.S2 Table B-3 Single Family Detached Housing (ITE lUC 210) - Florida Studies (excluding 2008 Collier Studies) Location SI"/IJrllt' Date TDt;olN N l'r1p l.en~"b TripGen TimrP"riod TO- Perc""t~""Tri", '''' Sonru IntO....'lrw< Inlen;..... ll.t. t.en~"h <"""",-",(,, (;^ ]c,'I;_]',,!, <."1 -'4<, ~'A " " -,L",c"""",, '"''''"''''(''' ,;^ !C:I \_],.'~, .'.41' Idl' NiA 'c.," ,"'-~, ''''on> ,,,,,~""(",.I'l ,", J"n-~' 'I; 'II ]pm (,'~, W^ (;t I ~ "'m~'''('",,,,,,' .'-'''''''',,(', " " ',0>-'" ... '6 "" H" N"^ ~l ~, .""",,,,, ('",,", "~..."(" " 1)-' JH'_~) " " '.11' 'W Ni^ 4' ~" '''"''''mI """". S"m~,,,(',,.I'l I ~! "m-~' "' " U' '.'11 "" (,c.4, "'''~'"(''"n1' -',..~'''( ".1-1 ,,) J..>~, I:.' Il' h,-, "'" 'i'A '1'<1 .....,~""(."LUl1' "~""""('".11 ," j'1I>_'.' " n I'.!I\ ,,~. I>-,^ ,".".- "'''-'''''' ("Ull' 'i;""~'''('".11 l~l )01>-9) i.~ ,. ~.('I .<411 N,'A .'~. " "''''~""l''''n1 -''''''~".('". n. ,~) )..n-'" ell7 k 'J(, .'4" ~,'^ ,I."" "",~"",-",,,", Ik-m'oo'(".1-'1 " M",_% '.. ''" W.HI " '"~ "^ ". ,~ I,"",',~')j"',,,.k ^",,,",,,, 1I"".oo'('''.H 12' M,".% '0' ,"~ , " ',,-, I,,,, ~i^ ,I~ l' I ""blc_OIIl'''' ^' A"''''.1l" 11,,,,,,,,,,-,(',, n ." M",.W, ," I ~l . ~, ",,-I "'" ,,'^ 11, ,~ 1.,tL,,,'OI"'C1/<A,,,,,,..,,,, IIClU".",(',. " '(II '1",.% :,,-1 c(~ ", ~".I " ,,'^ ~" .!" 1"",,j,"'II\'C1/<A"''''lIl''' ,'bo,I"",, " 1\< ().".~l ,.1<1 " 'J;,.' - '~l N..'A '" ,. ] ".ful,---I)I,,'''' ^,'''~'''''d '""nll"'{'" H "2 ",,_>7 ,. " 'I".' , " "'^ 1",,",1,"01"',,1< ^,~~.""" ('1""""",(',. 1'1 I~' 0,,_", '''' 'm 'I',.' 'HI' 'iiA .".'" I ,,,,,""(JI,,'c, A; A'~,c",'" (;"",>!te('" 1'1 .'1' 0,.,.'" I." "m ",-.<, "{' '^ 14 'if, I ""\,I.,{)]",,,, ~. ^'~""'c~ 11",1"",>('" n :'7 lte,.'n "m ,,,..' '." N'.' 'I,," ]u""I"";'y"k '~'''''m''~ ('b,,,I,,,,,,-, " '..' (le,.'n ",I ," 'I;,.' ,,'", ", ">.111 1"""I"OI,,,,,,k h,~",,,,,, <'1..,;,,,,,.(', H '" (k,_"J I.': ',Il' 'h'" ".'H ".-A ".'."' [",b','-()I"'",'kA,~"",,,, ('lu"'I"",.,.,, n '" ,~,.,)) 'I'. ,., ,,,.' 'I" ~.A '2'" IIO,l><h'4']".",Ic.',.""",,, ('1,.,-10,",(', H 4-11 lk,.<J) "i' " ~. '''''.' "" ~'A '''~ 1 m"",'Oh",,-'" .~..".""", CI",I,",,(', 1'1 , "" (",_'J1 ." '" ,'" N'-h " ~(, '''"~Id'',,~ k A,~"~,,,, (,,,1",,,(,,, n "" 1",-,.')'1 " "'" 0,'-'" " ,,, "'.^ 14-"1, Imdlolc_OI"~"/l.A'~~""" ('"1",,(,,, " ", 1"->:.'," '" .," k;,_', ',-1<, N,^ 4'1'1: 11"",,I"')II\~,k h'~k'"'''' 1""'('''.1-'1 " ^nc4l! 1''' ',10 "'cl' "iA '" " 1,,,",,ie_,)],,',,"1< A'''':~1<,' 1""'(,, " ." h""" ", I"'" -,,, "i^ -(.1" I,.,~,I,-()I"',, k ^,~,."""" Ihkd H I"" ., "''' ?I1 .<" ",' "ll "^ "j[ ~.' '''''",k''')I''''''IcA,~,.""," )~....,,('., " " .,,,.i1l I" ','I' ,,,.(, .. "'A " 1""..I,."h"",,1< h,~"""<' 1',,,,,,(',, " " ^ "-02 1;1f, -" ',.(, " N'^ /,".'" 1"'u.,k-')I"'"kA'~""""" 1'"",,,, H '" , ">' 1<> ',,, >;..{ I"n N'-h "-II' [".~k-"IL\'c""'A,~",,,,,,, I~",,,{ " H " All""! I>> <.1, '"'' "I' ~''-A "-'" I ,",..k"~1\'," '" ~'~,,"m'" ]':l"'I>t" I'L I'" ^ .(i:' !I" ",.1" Nih 1".1,1,..01>1',,1< ,',~,,:,,"', M,,,,,,(',, " 1(1' h~ "" ";,.', ~.'-h ~:~::::::~::~:~;~ >.t",,,(',, n II" , ".~ f(,'J ".-^ MJ,,,,,.,(',, n 1,4 A "~" I'" *:~ '-1 In ~.~.::::~~1:~ M,,,,,,(',, " I.' ~ ^ "~" l'I "" ."O'! >.t,,,,,,,c, " '" ^ -<" ,,,,- ;,/.. " ~I~ "',^ ."--'" f..J",I,',"IIL""I<^,",,,,,,,~ (',,,,,-d',, n '" Lk1-lJ' "".J "'" .~.-^ {-"-'~ I".bi,..lll",,, ~ A,~"~,,,, C,oud" n l.lI """;< I.'< ;" " H~ ~'.A 111",,1,"<)]"'" ^' A,~",,,,,,, ("md".1-l ',", ''''.11' :,'~ '" ,.(., ." N'A " ,,, I""\,I,--<)I'm~'^'~"'m',,, ('",.m(" " 'M 'Ic,.111 lO' . ~I> ''''''' " N.-'A ,,"I I""""",\[",~" h,~~",c~ {',m",'" n '7< 0,.,.(\1 '.l> , ", ,,-I, " >oJ.-, ''-i" 1"""",.11]",," ~ A,~"~,,, 1."01" n " I.h_(". I ~ 2 " " '<(, ~'i.' (, ~ (,I 1""""--(II'ml<,\,,,,~'"'''' Li.d " " 1",_".; ',"" ,. " N'h 1-:.1{, 1""""'''''''mK^'~''m'", [~k,I".H "I r--~~'''(' ~- -. "^ 1.1'1.," :::::'::~:;::::~G~ I~..,('" " -,~'.- "",'.H(, ---, - C,': ~.'A ]...,(" " ,'" I>>,_rl" W. (';.'" I""bl""hm,"'\"'~'"'''' 11<00",,,,,,(',. " . ^. ~" " N.'h ,,<.\4 Im,"'''''"''~''k h,~"~,,, ]t"""",I.,(,, " 'J' A,"" ~ '" N'A F ~ I Im,',"',O]",,, I< A~",,,,,,, 1L""""",,{',, " ^' .,,,",, '""" .''l ".'^ " 7< 1 ""~,,,., 11""" k ,"""'m'" II,'"",,,,,{',, " ". A "~" L" ,.]1. >', N.'-h " i>_ 1'",",kqll""""'A'~~'''<> I"",IS"", ',i52 ,- " ,- ~.74 O".J " bl<rlll,,.,.. , , ., .. \\....I""dA,= <Tn (""",,,",,,,, l<ale ,.. ~"',,(""''!!'" ,,,.10"""0'"'" ;'lCl"tlotl",.,,,m'n.l\}'~"'''tlC' , , Ill' AV<"'l!'TnpGrn<:7\I'''''' ,,-,,< ^WHI,,,V"fI WCJ~<dA''''''I<VMr M"h,"VMT 'I'" -'('.17 .':.::7 ,uo Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 B-2 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 107 of 191 Table B-4 Single Family Detached Housing (ITE lUC 210) Florida Studies (including 2008 Collier Studies) Location Si1~1l1nlls lJal~ 1010]# # Trirunl(lh Tril,Gcn TimoPcriO<l Trip ..."",ntIIi.... Tril" VM' S""rtt Inlerv;",.. lnt.rvl.... ~" \"'nwh ',~"m""(\'.G^ 1,,"I'.I~m ' .~u '.40 NiA " )] Sl<L~"'m.'" (;"m,,",,('o.(;A 1).'I'_I~m <.411 6.1(\ '^ ':"J4 ~",,,,StllllTt, s.,,,,,,..,('<,.1-1 ". ),,>9) '" '" 11I.uJ ,,'~I NiA ';t.l~ 'o"''''",c<''''' '",'~OUIC" " '" '''''~:> "' ;(, ~.77 Hit Nu\ 4,.'1'1 ",,,,~,,.(',,1lIIlV ,,,,~,"'t:,,, n 1'-' J",,..~' '" " ~..., j'II' "'^ ".on s<..,.,"UlC<>UIJtV s.",-~".r,',.ll III J_~) ,,' (,j U~ 1..\1' No'A (,l.4~ ""lL~)"( OUTI ,"",,,,,,,c.,,H 1')) lL">-~) 1'.' J21 ".~, 4f.', "^ '151 """",,,C<nm'v S"",-~lloC",FL " JOllJ-Y) ).1 " 1\20 '.'11 NiA Nil> s.r.,,,,,c,,,,. s""~",C,,.I'I. ,~l J,<n-~) '" 1M, ("M KAH N!A .'.'.," """""liIC","" ,,,,~,,,,r,,.I'L ''J:' )'"o-~) 1m )111 1.16 '.40 NiA 41.'10 ,",m"~'("illI'Y Hcmllllll,d\,_H. ". MI~"% '" ,. 1'1.111 '" Ho ,,'^ 40" lmJal<>-Oln'crl<^,"","",,,, Ilc",,,,,,"'C,,.H. 12' M",-% m~ :'Il' ~.l1 .".1 (,.1,-' ,,'^ 4',-,7 Im<l".,.OIIH:<&^,""""'" 11<"..."]"C,,,1-1 ~,' M",.% "2 I" '.2" ~".( 0.1" ,,^ 1(, 4~ Im<l"I".OI,,''''''' ",,,,,,,"''''' l]e.".."cJ.'C".FI "II M"".\II, 21'" M >.9' 'hI" U' " ,".~ I""..I.,.()I,,'''-&''''''''''''''' ('llu,l"n,C".l'I D.' (jct.~1 I'll '.1" ~, '" N;^ 4] .~1 1,","Lk~)]",,,'I<^,~""'t'" Charlol1cr-".n ]41 '1<,.~1 14~ .',~I ~,,-~ 4.11> W^ ;IJ) Im,luk.-Oh\,,,,.&^'~""t'" ('I-'rl.""'('''.1-1 " "~<'toy, '"' ~,.m 'I...' '''.'1'' Ni^ ~. 'K' Imdo"'Oio",-,'&^'~"''''''' ('lI,,,",,,,,C".FL m (),'_~J I 'i~ '", ",,- "."" "" 14\11, J",",,"-'OIIH-,,&A~"""'" Cl..",.",(" " :51 ()".~7 ~l, 1."" ~".'i '4'1 "^ .'6.'4 l,,,,lule-()l,,,..&.~,~,,,,.,,,, ('harj""d'",fl '4~ '1e1.'/7 '" ".!l1! ~a'. ''/,0 N'^ 4(,.:'1' ,,,,,,.1,,,)],.,,,& A,~"u".. Char"""r-" '" )1<1< (1e'-'17 Ij~ I,.... ~".5 ,.ill ".. '7.(,2 Imdol,'Olh'"'/<^''"''''"''' O"'"""'("'.H .'" , ,,'-~" <Ih <.4(1 "".~ .'.lKl ~- ~, 'll I ind"k..Oh,,,,'& A'"",,,,, ('1,,,",,,,(',,.1'1 ., ",,'.'17 I ~~ '.'0 ~".'i 4.7" N..'A )'.\4 i<"",I".Ohv",&"",,,,""'" ('"""..n,('",I'1 1.111; lIeL.~7 '" Id" ""'. ~.Il> '^ 4:04. """,I,,.(~i""'-/<""~'L""" ('"I],,,,(',, " ., D,,,'.'I') "' I'XH ",...(, 11.4" N,^ 14.'.~c 1""I.k_Olll'cr& A'~."'''''' (','lh'~('''.1l '" U,,'-'I'! "" 1H" ,,,., (,.4(1 ~'A 4~.~? ',"""1".0]'".,&,\"",,,,,,, 1.1a;('".FL '" , ~I! 111' (,,7" hi 1(1.~1 Ni^ "".'4 '''H"LI''()I",c~/,;A,,,,,,,,,'',, 1..]o,('''.I'L " ^ ~I, 2]2 IH.lil 7".' 7.'" N'A ">.Ill' r"'....lo-Olh,.,-/<^"",;.l1'" j".o"o.n lei. A",'.1ll ,17 .,'.'" )".01 '.te' N.'A 1".." lu"l,,]o-Ol,,'''-/<^'~''~''' 1""0("'.1-'1 " , r~" I" (,."iI ',0-/ '.1' ,,'^ .. ',mlu]e.O]l\''''&^<~'''''''' I'"~,,,(',, I'l '" A ..~" II~ '1' " ,.7.' "'^ 1,7.1,4 1,,\daI.,.OI,,<rI>;A,~."II1'" 1',,,,,,(',, FI '" A,,~" '"" 'Xll ,._6 /,.10' NiA 4'.<1' ]IOOak'()I"'"&^,,,,,,,,,~~ 1'."""(",, H. " .,"..I,? ''" '.1' ,,,-, ' ~< "" 4,1,' 1"""lk-<)I".,.,&A,~,,,,"'" """,,,",, " I<~ A",lC J(,] '., "'e( ,.~, ""A ',7.1" Im".Ic-nl",,,,&A,~"''''''~ M,,,.,,(,, H IiIJ Aw,"2 '" >...: ;". '" ".'A 4"'" Klml<,,-I"",,/< A>~,,""'~~ ,Iou"","" H 1(15 A .~I~ '" 7" 7".,; .. Ni^ .';'111 Krm~.".lh""/<^"wi",,, .....,,,oC,, n ,,- ^,.II, "" (.-"4 10.(, ",'J "'^ 4,'''' ~m",,,'.ll,,,,,&A,~,,u",,, ~bm"" ('".1'1 I': ^,.(I: '" '.1<7 ".(, "" NI,\ 0.'1'" K\lTII,,,-II,"""^'~"',"'", M,,,~,,,( " II III ^tr_(lc " ,...4 7".(, 4.": ~;^ "'5', KJmiev-II,,,,.,,^,,,,,,,,,,,, '-mud,' " '" ,,,,_rn J7J '.M 1,,_ 7,111 ,,'^ (.C'."" ] Ltililc'OI,,'C"1<^'n""", I'Ln""(',, 1'1. ?'1 ",HI.' I.'~ j.71 '''"' 4.0] ,,'^ '"" l",d,11o-0h,',,&A<~.e..'", Cum,C,' R )(1(, rICH" "(, hi, '-~,' ,,'^ "",",1,.011"", & ^,,~'''"'''' ("Iru'(''' n 11,4 ,",,"I' )4~ 1,,-/ ".1.1 NIA ~~ ::::::~~;:::::~ ~:::~~ (U""(,, n 174 ,,,,,_f>' 14, 1._' Ni.^ I~""r-, n " I),;c-I>', I" " ~:+-- J",,\;i<_Olll'c,.I<^,~~"r"" 1""(',, n " '41, I'..'~ Im<",ic_OI".",'& ^"~.,,""" I"k,('" 11. '" '" D.H7 I"'" ~'A 1,,,.,I,,OI"'(TI<;^,,,,,"'''' I,kd" n ." 1""'-111, I". ~ I: ',1> N-'A <:71 IU"~Ik'1l]L\',.,-1< A,~,,~"" I....,{" n "., IIC,.III. .'~' ) .~, ,,'I' N'A I,'HJ )1l"u,I<,()l"",'&A,~",,'" Jk""I1ll,,,,,'''.Fl " A ~~17 -'", <.11,' "-'. ')" N,.' Im,""'OI"",/<I\""",,.'''' Ik'"IlD"'(''' " "' ^'r"" ;.<{, '.'" -,-, '.S> N..A 'm,",I<~()I1"," I< A""'..,,~~ 1I''fl,,,,,~,,r-,,. 1-1 " ^I"_1\1 '" 7.1' ,,~ ~.'" !,M " l' luo<u,](,-Oh""'"^""",,,,, 11""""",,,,(', " j, A,,,."1 L" )"-1,,, No'A ~ 1",<t,k'IlI"',"^,^",,,,,,,,,, 1\,lhc~C" " " M"r."~ J..-----;'-'- 7".(, N.-A J""I'"o-C)I,,~,&^,~~'''''' 1"'lli"c.-, " " ~I"r'" .'1' ',.6 !i:~ [n,<I'"C.I)Il'~~" ^"'"..-"',"" (',,1111,,(''' " )1-' M""'.:,?~ I--J ..~..... I..'" ;,,-f, ','" N.'^ h","LI<.Oj",,~& A"",'~I'" (,,,lhc~(',, 1-'1 " M,"'I'.' L-.1.~' ~,< ,,-(, ~ II.''' ~..^ """~~""&^""'!!'!2'~ 1,,'uIS,~ I<I,-'Ij() ^" <Tri ,- .. .,7~ 57.4 \1'.' ~''''A,'''' hi , ,~: ...1 .-v fok""(;""rg;.,""I"--~.,cn"t"",l"tedm,u",u..,)',",,i,'i,, ",,,Il<ooAv""".olrtl)("'K,,,,,,,,IO""dC,, rH',A"","~< TnpGcrlCnL'''''' Ro.. A",",,~,VMI Wci~""dA"",,,,,\i~n M"io",VM'1 51J-' -'1.70 4l;W' Tindalc-Oliver & Associates, Inc. May 2008 B-3 Collier County SF Trip Characteristics Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 108 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORT A TION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY FINAL REPORT 1")',I;c'r 1''>'111'" 1,'11\".;,1'1 \,... ~ 1.1... '-- \. l Iv' I " ,...H December 17, 2008 P"'l'aredfor: Collier County Transportation Planning Department 2885 S Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Prepared by: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc, 10001'1. Ashley Dr., #100 Tampa, Florida, 33602 ph (813) 224-8862Jax (813) 226-2106 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 109 of 191 rn Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. ~ Planning and F.ngineering December 17, 2008 Mr. Nick Casalanguida Director Collier County Transportation Planning Department 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Dear Mr. Casalanguida: Enclosed is the Final Technical RepOlt for the Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study. As you know, there are several primary components of the impact fee, including cost, credit, and demand. The studies primary findings in terms of these variables are summarized below: . The cost component reflects the recent decrease in construction costs, and results in a lower cost per lane mile figure than what is currently adopted. In comparison to other communities, the County's overall cost is slightly higher than the average due to the additional costs related to building interchanges, mitigation, and utilities. . In terms of the credit component, Collier County is above average compared to other jurisdictions, reflecting a higher level of non-impact fee investment in roadway capacity expansion projects. This relatively high credit reduces the impact fee. . The demand component is measured in temlS of vehicle miles of travel (VMT), which is obtained by multiplying trip generation rate, trip length, and percent new trips. The updated demand component reflects the additional studies included in the database for various land uses. More specifically; o As part of the update study, TOA conducted trip characteristics studies for single family land use. The study results indicated that the VMT is higher than what was used for the adopted fee and the average of TO A's Florida studies database. To be conservative, this study combined local studies conducted in Collier County with studies completed in other jurisdictions and used the database average in the impact fee calculations, which resulted in a lower impact fee figure than what the potential fee would have been with a VMT based solely on local data. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 . Phone: (813) 224~8862 . Fax: (813) 226~2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 . Phone: (407) 657-9210 . Fax: (407) 657-9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 . Phone: (863) 533-8454 . Fax: (863) 533-8481 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 110 of 191 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, lIle. PL:umilJg a.mI ElIgillccling Mr. Nick Casalanguida December 17, 2008 Page 2012 o There were several studies added to the retail land use, which increased the overall VMT for the retail category. o Similarly, additional studies and analyses resulted in either increase or decrease of the VMT for several other uses (increase in VMT for approximately] 0 land uses and a decrease in VMT for about eight land uses). Table 2 in the report provides a summary of these changes. o Finally, after the issuance of the Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Final Report dated Decemher R, 2008, TOA received the new edition (8th) of the Trip Generation reference report prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). A comparison of data in the 7'" Edition (which is used in this study) and the 8th Edition suggested that the trip generation rate for the "banks with drive-thm" land use decreased sib'11ificantly. This decrease is incorporated into the study. . Overall, the calculated fee is $11,760 for midsize single family home compared to the current fee of $11,523. Table 11 of the report provides a comparison of Collier County's current and proposed fees as well as those in other counties for several land uses. If you should have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me or Nilgiin Kamp. It has been our pleasure to have worked with County staff on this important project. Sincerel y, Tilldale-Oliver & Associates, Illc. ~J7~~ Steven A Tindale, P.E., AlCP President 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 . Phone: (813) 224-8862. Fax: (813) 226-2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 . Phone: (407) 657-9210. Fax: (407) 657-9106 195 South CenlralAvenue, Bartow, Florida 33830. Phone: (863) 533-8454. Fax: (863) 533-8481 Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 111 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORT AnON IMP ACT FEE UPDATE STUDY Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 DEMAND COMPONENT ...................................................................................... 2 Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor .................................................. 9 COST COMPONENT ............................................................................................. 9 County Costs. .................. ... .... ........... ..... ................ ........................... .......... ... 10 S tate Costs...................................................................................................... 12 Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) ................................................. 15 Capacity Added per Lane Mile ...................................................................... 15 Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added..................................................... 16 CREDIT COMPONENT......................................................................................... 17 Gasoline Tax Equivalent CrediL................................................................... 17 Ad Valorem Credit......................................................................................... 19 Present Worth Variahles ................................................................................ 20 Fuel Effici ency............................................................................................... 20 Effective Days per year................................................................................. 21 CALCULATED TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE................ 21 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE COMPARISON ................ 23 APPENDICES Appendix A - Demand Component Calculation Appendix B - Cost Component Calculation Appendix C - Credit Component Calculation Appendix 0 - Ad Valorem Credit Appendix E - Single Family Tiering Analysis Appendix F - Calculated Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 112 of 191 COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY Introduction Collier County's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance was originally adopted in January 1985, to assist the County in providing adequate transportation facilities for expected growth. Section 74-335(a) of the current ordinance requires the fee to be reviewed and, if appropriate, updated every three years.] As part of this process, Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) has been retained to conduct the 2008 transportation impact fee update study. Following the introduction, this report consists of the following sections: . Demand Component . Cost Component . Credit Component . Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule . Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison The methodology used for the transportation impact fee study follows a standards-driven approach. In the standards-driven approach, also known as a consumption-based impact fee, new development is charged based upon the proportion of the vehicle miles of travel, that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. Included in this document is the necessary support material utilized in the calculation of the transportation impact fees. The general equation used to compute the impact fee for a given land use is: [Demand x Cost] - Credit = Fee The demand for travel placed on the transportation system is expressed in units of vehicle miles of travel (daily nip generation rate times the trip length times the percent new trips (of total trips)) for each land use contained in the impact fee schedule. It should be noted that trip generation is expressed in average daily rates since new development consumes ] Source: Collier County Code afOrdinances, Chapter 74, Section 74-335(a), "Review Requirement" Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 113 of 191 trips on a daily basis. The cost of building new capacity is typically expressed in units of dollars per vehicle mile or lane mile of roadway capacity. The credit is an estimate of the future non-impact fee revenues generated by new development that are allocated to roadway capacity expansion construction projects. Thus, the impact fee is an "up front" payment for a portion of the cost of building a lane mile of capacity directly related to the amount of capacity consumed by each unit of land use contained in the impact fee schedule that is not paid for by future tax revenues generated by the development. It should be noted that the information used to develop the impact fee schedule was based upon the most recent, reliable and localized data available. There are 10 input variables used in the fee equation: Demand Variables: . Trip generation rate . Trip length . Percent new trips . Interstate and toll facility discount factor Cost Variables: . Cost per lane mile . Capacity added per lane mile Credit Variables: . Equivalent gas tax credit (pennies) . Present Worth . Fuel efficiency . Effective days per year A review of these variables and corresponding recommendations are presented in the following sections. Demand Component The amount of road system consumed by a unit of new land development is calculated using the following variables and is a measure of the vehicle miles of new travel a unit of development places on the existing roadway system: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 114 of 191 . Number of daily trips generated; . Length of those trips; and . Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already traveling on the road system. As part of this update, the trip characteristic variables are obtained primarily from three sources: (1) similar studies previously conducted throughout Florida and in Collier County (Florida Studies Database), (2) 2008 Collier County Single Family Residential Trip Characteristics Studies, and (3) the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (7th edition). The Florida Trip Characteristics Studies Database is included in Appendix A. This database was used to detennine vehicle miles of travel which is developed from trip length, percent new trips, and trip rate for most land uses. In addition, trip generation data from the ITE 7th edition report is used. In all instances where trip generation rate data was available from both the ITE reference report and the Florida Studies database, a blend calculation was used to increase sample size. Residential As part of the 2008 Update study, Collier County conducted a single family trip characteristics study at four residential sites. The Collier County Single Family Trip Characteristics Studies Final Report, May 23,2008 documents the results of the study including the trip generation rate (TOR), trip length (TL), and percent new trips (PNT) of the four sites. This infonllation was used to calculate the vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for existing and future single family residential subdivisions in Collier County. As shown in Table I, the VMT ranged from 39.07 to 104.86 for the studies sites, with a weighted average value of 60.64. Based on discussion with County statT and to have a larger sample size, the data from the four sites studies was blended with the TOA Florida Studies database which resulted in a conservative VMT value of 51.70. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 3 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 115 of 191 Table 1 Collier County Single Family Residential VMT Summary (1) i,,';;:r.;~g~ Percent Impact Gener~tion r.;,i+':B~...',:~.'~~..~~,;..""; .:,~;~7'F:g)y; ;""',i"'iSA*~,::-, ""," " ""'0 #;1''''\'>''''''/(''3') Rate",;" ~:TripsF' VMT,. Site I 74 du 12.81 3.05 100% 39.07 19.54 Site 2 42 du 9.55 10.98 100% 104.86 52.43 Site 3 97 du 8.78 11.29 100% 99.13 49.56 Site 4 315 du 6.97 6.55 100% 45.65 22.83 Weighted Average (4 sites) 8_33 7.28 ]00% 60.64 30.32 Weighted Average (FL Studies) 7.81 6.62 100% 51.70 25.85 (1) Source: Collier County Single Family Trip Characteristics Studies, May 23, 2008, Table I (2) VMT is calculated by multiplying the trip generation rate by the trip length and by the percent new trips variables for each respective land use studied. (3) To allocate the assessment for a trip evenly between origin-end development and destination- end development, the VMT (Item 2) is divided in half. (4) Source: Appendix A, Singe Family Land Use Summary Table Non-Residential As part of the 2008 update study, TOA updated the retail (ITE LUC 820) trip length and percent new trips curves. The trip length and percent new trips curves use data from Florida Studies Database and ITE to develop a regression equation that predicts trip lengths for each tier. For the update, 14 Florida studies were added to the trip length regression analysis (to the existing II studies) and 40 studies (9 from Florida and 31 nationwide studies) were added to the percent new trips regression analysis (to the existing 82 studies). The updated percent new trips and trip length curves with this additional data resulted in an average increase in VMT of 27 percent for all tiers. In addition to changes in the retail (LUC 820) trip lengths and percent new trips, demand data (TOR, TL, and PNT) for other land uses were updated based on additional data included in the Florida Studies Database since the 2006 Study. Table 2 presents the percent changes in VMT (TOR, TL and PNT) for each land use where the demand component was updated. Note that only the land uses that are included in the adopted impact fee schedule are shown. Appendix A provides additional detail for the demand component calculations for each land use. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 4 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study <(O)~ 000) ~o~ .N_ o .0 ZS(O ~ ~ e >,~ 2ro<l.> -::l0l C1l~C1l u.oo. e(J) ",LL Ol <( "'C Ql N- Ql U - Ql .0- III Ql 1-00 ... .2 III Ql Cl l: III .r: (,) I- ~ > III Ql .;: o Cl Ql - III (,) Ql Ql LL. - U III a. E " " 0 :,iiX :0 :0 :0 ,; " ~ -" -" -" .g " " "0 'a 'a 0:; " " " d " ~ .g C -;; ~ d a '. > > > a ~ ~ a d "' ~ d d " " 0 0 " I .;i:~; 0 0 0 .~ 'is c " " " 'is '" c " .S .g -s " " " c .g "0 I 0 '" Jj " '" "0 '" Vi -" -l 'is ~ 'is c I.... '" '" '" 'is " 'is u " c- "' 0 "' 8 H " u u u "' -l :0 "' :::> :0 ..c c ..c 0. c- c- c- u.. " ..c -l e ~ ;:: 0 ;:: c I.~;:.'; ~ ~ 3 ;:: '0 = ;:: ~ " .~ s g. 0 0. 0 "' 0 U.l ~ " v v OJ ~ "' ~ c " t: c; t: ~ ;-. c c c ~ 5 t: 6 .S 2 2 2 - 0 0 " " .5 " .5 " 0 " " 0 '" -s " -s " " " -s " -s -s " TI -s ..':;;: 0 0 0 , ~ ~ ~ 2 "0 '" '" ~ -" 0 ~ -" " :.; 0 2 0 0 0 "' "' v ;;: ,0 ,0 " '" v " 0 " " 0' 0' "' '" "' - Vi .~ 'Vi "0 co co co ";:;) " N ";:r. " N ;.-, 0 ;.-, - <Ii - ~ - rr. ;.-, " ;.-, '" -l ~ '" ~ ;;: .'. .; ;.-, " ;.-, " ;.-, " -;; ,0 u ~ ,.0 u u.. ;;: 00 & .0 'i3 .0 ~ .0 'i3 c 0' :::> 0' :J a ~ a co 7 i: " " ...J a -= -l '- '" '" '" '" ~ - co 0 0 '" '" 1!' ;.-, '5 " " t; " "" ~ gf ~ v c '5 .0 :<, ..... "' - , ~ c >, 0 .s- o "' .2 'i3 ;.-, 0 'i3 Co " 0 0 -;; " -;; 'i3 .0 " 'i3 " .0 U '" V W " 0 " 0 '" '" ~ " c '" c v " ~ . ~ c "' c .5 " " "' c .5 -" .5 .2 g .2 " 0 " 0 "0 ~ " "' " ~ :0 :0 " 'E ",'''2 :0 0 -E :0 " " 0 " v C ~ -l -' 0 -' " ~ v -s -" '0 B ~ ~ 2 .~ "- " B ~ " c- o c- o c- o - .5 B u B " u " g :;;0 w '0 ~ ~ " " " .S " '" 0 " c- " " '" - .g 0 0 " '" u '" .S '" v ;; ~ a .1! c .s -' " '" -' 0 -' z > " c- c- ,0 c- ,0 ;;: 'D 0 '" ,0 '" 0' 0' c- '" "- " 0 ;;: 'O~ 0' 0' N 1l '" E 0 ..c 0' '" 1!' 1!' 2i~ ~ "::': '" if> if> ... zj ,; - - ~ 0 - zj "' c - ;;; eo " " " w '"i ;.-, 'i3 ;.-, 'i3 ;.-, ~ ;.-, " - ;.-, 0 co ;.-, ;.-, ;.-, 0 , .0 .0 .0 .0 '" .0 '" .0 5. .0 '" " .0 '" 0 0 0 >, '" ;.-, '" ] '" ] '" ] '" " .0 '" "' C .0 '" 0 '" ~ " '" ~ ~ " 0 ~ .~ ~ w -" ~ " " 0 ~ " ':f;- , '" '" B ~ 'i3 'i3 ..2 " 0 0 " '" 0 " '" " " 0 0 ,. " ~ ~ ~ ~ " '" ~ 0 " ~ 0 :0 :J:. ~ w " " " ~ 0 '0 '" 5:2 Vi .- Vi 0 " ~ Vi 'i3 Vi g 0 0 u 0 u g 0 .~ u " " " " " '" w i: " N N " 0 ~ " N '" .~ '" 0 u '" ,0 '" ~ "0 0 ~ ~ '" u '" " ~ 0 '" u '" '" P- ." '" 0' '" '" '" 'C '" w is ~ g " c c- o 0 c 0 0 -' 0 " ...J 0 ;.-, 0 u 0 0 .~ ,.. c- ';;' c- 'V-: '", c- u: c- c- u: u c- .0 c- u: c- c- u: ~ " .. w = p = w ';;.? ,0 ;;': 0 ,0 ,.0 ,0 ,0 ::. ;;: ..c Q :;: '" 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0 ~ 0- '" '" - 0- 0 'T co ... U " ;;. N - - - '" n ... '" ~.-; - '= 'i3 0 .g 0 0 0 " 0 " " 0 :;,. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " 'f.' '" 'j .~ - ~ '" '" ~ u ~ ~ u '" '5 - " E "' S 5 3 " - :;;0 0 6 '" & , i:- n " " "" '0 w " -< :;, I '" S 0 ~ g ~ :~ ~ u.. '" ~ = c; t t '" = ;J ~ " 0 - 0 0 -i:: u -'I .J " ~ '-' ~ P- o. ~ 5 " Cl 0 ~ 2!' :'S :'S '" d: c " -<: 25 c 15 ;; 1= ~, '" -" G 0 ~ -'" "" I. ..,.~ 0- Z' -'" u u " z c - ... ~ '0 " 8, N 0 "' a '-' ;; a .~ , " a c "- a ~ ";- ~ - c ";- 0 :: " -s - vi "' " " 0 " u '" '" "' '" 25 .g '" .c :.0 .= ~ W:; :.J c ~ '" "0 0 "", ~ 0 t> -' " ~, ~, ~ " ~ Vi -' - N :;;0 ~ '" :;;0 '" Vi -< '" u 0 N N ;:; N '" - co c- :;, - N ~, " if> if> - ..l ~, N N N ~, N N N - l: Ql U ... Ql ll. >, >,-0 = B 0'" 8~ &1~ ._ P- ''5 :::> u ~ u.. U d "- .5 c ." " t o P- ~ e d ~ <r, ] 00' E d 'u 0 00 00 ~ "d 00 ~ 0 " 0 .eo N q ~ " " ,r, -,; a -0 " e 0 " f::; 0 <I:"'~ oom .__0""- ,,- ,0 c'r- ~ ~ " >-~ ~ro!ll ::>0> ~15~ ,,0) O)LL 0> <I: .... (,) ell ~ Co ~E :J-c .5 CIl .... .... c: (,) o CIl (,)- _CIl Ncn ... CIl 0 -- .ow ell CIl 1-0) c: ell ..c: U I- :iE > w CIl ';: o 0) CIl .... ell U CIl CIl LL. '~. "",/' g'rn..-., << ~ ~ -= ... ~ u 8;. -;.:: .... c: CIl (,) ... CIl a.. "'U 1-0"' ~...1 z o 1= <<: '" ..: u '" ..: ... ~ <= ~ o - U 0; 0. ~ o ~ "'"" 'o~ EJ:! Z:!..o ,., " u a " D- " D- 15 G 0 o " o ~ ~ " e~ UN ~u U ;:J -== o ~ ~ -5 ';t:. -9 o u ... ~ $'0 "'OJ: U t'- ~ >-. ~'" 0'0 U 0 "'0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .5 ~ u "5 '0 ~ "'iJ " Vl ~ ... " "- '0_ ~ 0 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ .9 . u o ~ '0 N "'00 U ;:JO ... ,., 3~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ""&~ ~ '0 2~ u Z ~"- d"- ~ " , ~ ,.,"0 ..0 ;a '0 - ~ ~ " '" u " - - u " .S g. ~ ...J 0 e:l ~ 0 '0 ,0 ~ '? !J .~ '" a "- ~ '" ... ~ -0 i;l 15 ~ ~ N v ~u<S ~ :J S " ... ~ E E .g 4-f!~ o " 0 '0 _ 'g g- E .sE~ u ~ .S =' ~ 1) "'0 ~ :;:; ;12. ~ 'O~'O 5';.~ ""'z " '0 "- .3 ~ ~ " ~ ~ " 0'0 .5 :::: ..."" ~ u " '0 U :0 " - 3,=. " ~ 15 - o i! goo u :0 ~ " D- S <'d o ~ o '0 .~ k) ro ii .a::: 0.. gj:..:s ::; "'0 ;:l ~3~V) \0 ;:l::e o ~ g 0 u G: '" ~ d"- ~'€ o ~ "'", " c '0 " :;: o N ... <<: :Z ~ u '0 '" 00 Vl Z o u ~ ~ f-o - ;:J 5 f-o 21= -Vl ~~ o '" ... ~ ~ '0 ~ ::0 >, '" '0 U ~ " ~ u .S ,0 o' '" ,.,,,, ",,,, -g13 ~ ~ f-< " 13 v z 0 b ~ c::.. f-< .S "'0 ~ ::0 " '0 iJ ~ ~ !J " .::: e; o o 'TI Vl " '0 ~ :;: '" '" '" - u ~ ~ - o o o '" .t: ~ co ..'! '0 u~ - JJ o " '8 >- ::l .;: :::'0- .~z " " .::: .g " ~ ;:J ;;; ~ z "- "" ... @ ~ ~ ~ .:6 ;::l ~'O ,., c c;~ " " " o .~ ~ u So u - u :0 " - " 0. " 15 o " OJ ~ !:: " " 0 " N ,,0 .8 0' ;:;; g v >. "'0 .g ..0;7.. '0 ~ U ~ 2 o u '0 '" o ~ d"- '" ,.,,,, ",.0 '0'0 U U ~ ~ " " 2 2 u u " u ._ '0 ,0 0' 00 t'- <= U '0 iJ ~ o o '" "" c " -s ~ o 2- U 1f '0 u ." o (:5 "c >- ~J: ,.,- - ~ "0 2 ~ " .::: ~ " 0 :) t; o ... '" ,0 0' ~ '? OJ '0 ~ ;;; o '" '" ~ o '0 " -" " :0 " - " D- c 15 u " ~ " o N U ;:J ... - o ~ ~ u -s 2 ~ o '0 ,0 is '" ,., .0 '0 U ~ " u - .s '0 " " " .g 'ii OJ '" '" OJ !:: u -s '0 ~ ';;:j ,., "ii @ gp 'ii " u :0 2 ~ o "0 d"- o "'0 .0'0 '0 ~ U U rJ; ;.a " ~ ~ V) .5 ..g =' 'C o " ~G:: ... ~ d"- o ~ - ~ o o 0, UJ EU '6..~ 8 "" 0:0 o ~ "0 " " " .g 'ii UJ '" '" UJ !:: -E - o ~ .~ ,., -;; " " co " 'ii " u :0 2 U " '0 d"- f"'l -S ,., " .0'0 '0 ~ ~ U tIl ;..;s ~ 0 b Vi .:: w "'~ o 15 ~G:: ~ N - ~ g ~ U u - O,:j B< :..:s~ u UJ :;:= o N t'- >> >>-0 = E! "Vl o " U-;; ia -0::> U :l UJ t> '" i " .S< " t:: o D- ~ " ~ f-o ~ d"- ~ 't; o o 0, u .s '@ " ~ .c -;; 'S U "- Vl ~. " " 'u o ~ .;;: -ideo [;0 .~ ~ q t) ".D -,; S -0 " " g ~Q ... 00 <(m~ oom ~o~ .N_ o ,0 ZO", E:'~ 2roQ) -::>0> <1l ~ <1l ",.o(L eQ) Q)LL 0> <( t/) CIl ';: o OJ CIl ... ell U CIl CIl U. ... () ell ~ a. -gE ::l"lJ ,5 CIl ... ... t: () o CIl ()- _CIl N(J) ... CIl 0 - '+- ..Qt/) ell CIl ~OJ t: ell ..t: U ~ :2: > ... t: CIl () ... CIl C. . ", ; --l --l --l --l " 0 N , --l 0- 0- w.. "- --l --l --l ;l 0 00 Vl w.. "- w.. .:2 ie. " " .5 " w.. a U U " -5 -5 -5 .5 " ;; f-- -5 -5 " ;:0 0 .3 .3 .3 .3 -5 .g " --l 00 .E y, .3 .3 .3 .3 " .... 00 " " " " '0 -a 0 " " ;; ;; ;; ;; " " " " U .3 II~".". ;; " '0 '0 '0 ;; ;; OJ " ;; Vl ~ ::J " '0 0. 0. 0. '0 '0 ~ 0. 0- ~ ~ ~ 0. 0. '0 '" U --l " ~ c c c ~ ~ 0. c- -5 " " a ~ 0 '0 C ~ ~ ~ OJ '0 .... 0. ~ ;; a c " Ij~li .3 .3 .3 .3 0 c- E " E ~ I " .3 .3 - 0 .s " " " " .3 " '0 " " " " ~ ~ 0 ~ " " -5 0. ~ '0 ;. ~ '0 '0 '0 '0 ~ ~ " ~ ;; '0 '" " I '0 '0 '0 ~ .... " ~ -oe. ,0 ..0 .0 '0 0 oS -oe. 0 '0 ;: ..0 0' 0' .' .0 ,. ~ " -T f-- -oe. .' ~ '" :! '" 0' .' -oe. " "ii . '1: N - - - ~ '" .~ u '" 4- 00 N - 00 " ~ " 0 I.... " " " " _'0 Vl " 'y " ~ ~ ~ ~ >> " >> ~ .0 U ~ 0 ~ ~ '0 '0 .D .D .D 0' 1l c I '0 '0 a c- '0 0i; .y '0 , " , " ~ ~ .~ " , '0 .0 '0 , '0 '" N "cr. " ';j; " "<ij , '!ii , -;:r. u ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ " '0 ~ ~ " ~ ~ " , 0 ~ '" 1i " I. ~ >. " >> " , " " .D E ~ ] " 0 'i3 ~ 'i3 ~ 2 2:- ~ 'i3 0 0 'i3 " - ~ ~ I ~ .~ ~ " ~ ~ '0 '" .5 ~ /t~..~, " " .5 ~ " " '0 " U a .S a " 0 a ;; .13 " .5 a ti , c- '0 -5 " .5 :n '" 0 C '0 , 0 f-- f-- .5 c- c- o 0 0 " c- -" c- c- " oS c- .. '15 z z z '" z '0 c- .~ c- '15 '0 .3 u z " z "- c.. "- ~ "- "- z z z " "- - z ii; ..'.... 'i'- c- c- o. "- 'i'- " '0 " :n " 0. "- "- T' "- 0 ;l " ~ " ~ ;l ~ ;l ~ " ~ ;l ;l ~ --l '0 " 2 ~ '0 ;l ;; c " a " 0 " '0 C '0 c- a '" '0 C ~ 2) OJ OJ c " iJ ,. ....,.'. a " " a " " -oe. c. -oe. ~ .0 '" I, "6 ,0 4- .- 4- -oe. '~ 4- 4- '; ~ o' '" "6 .' 0' c .' 0 0 .. 0 .. c -oe. - '" -T ~ 5 N -oe. 00 ~ -T '" 0' 0' - >> ;; -T " ~ .,,' ~ " - " - " - ~ - " 00 ~ '" " ~ .D " " ~ " " ~. " , " ~ " , " '0 .D " " " 0 " 0 " 0 0 " ~ ~ . (, .D ~ .D .D ~ .D .D .D '0 " '0 ~ ~ '0 .D -5 " " .s " .5 " .5 ~ " " '0 '0 -5 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 .D '0 ~ ~ '0 '" " '0 . " ~ " - " ~ - " ~ - " '" '" " :2' 0 ~ ~ ,',; , " " , , ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ;l 0 '0 0 C 0 ;l '" '0 0 ;l 0 '0 '" ;l iI1 " 0 " .S ~ 8 " c ~ " a ~ 5 " a " c " a " " 2 0 " " .~ '" '" b " 0 " " 0 " " ~ .s " " .s " .~ " " " " .5 " " " '0 '" .S " N '0 " " '0 " " ....,; C: c c - .5 C .5 ? C '0 C '" .~ c- '0 6 '" '0 0 " " --l ~ --l ~ --l 0 --l ~ --l 0 --l 3 --l 0 --l ~ 0 Z --l ~ 0 --l "ii f-- U c- U f- U c- U f-- U c- U f-- U c- U f-- Ii: c- c- - c- f-- - u "... . Otl..Ul ~ C ~ f-- ,. c :.~ .c ,c . ,c -oe. -oe. ,. -oe. '" = 0 c' c' c' c 0' c' .c c' 0 -= - ::;; 0 00 ",. '" - - ~, 0' -D '" ~ U ~;. ~, M ~. ~, ~, ~, ~, -D '7' -T ~ "i -;' ~ 0 .. 4- 't; 4- .... 4- - 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" :2 '" '" a a '" 2, '" , , , , -;; a ~ a ~ a ~ "" 25 "" 0 2.D a ~ "" a 0 0 0 '" a, 0, 0, 0, a, a, a a 0 0 ;;;;;); - - , - -;;; , , " if. 0, , 0, 0, 0, - - - - - .' "5 . ,. ~ " .~ ~ " ;l '" '" " "" ; s ;; " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -;;; ~ -5 ~ ". :2 ;oJ , , c- .E , a :2 .~ 0 .~ I " a a ~ , Vl " -= c a ~ .E '" g - 3 " Vi '" ti I. , ~ ~ ~ a Vl iI1 - " - 0 c ;:: ...... , - -'- - ti '" - - - - "5 " :2 - 0 a > , ...... a 25 g .g <( ;; 0 6 ~ 25 0 0 0 U '0 -!' is. >. ~ .;: --l 0 0 a ~ 0 25 " " ~ E " e: " I' .,.. :;;: ~ ~ - - N -T .c '" :J E '" Vl " 5 ~ ~ f-- '(; '2 "(; '8 ';; '3 '(; '8 ~ " - > '" 1j 1j ;; 1j 1j ;; ;; "- " ~ 'C a " " 0 " 0:: '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" '" z Vl :r: 0:: Q '" ",U a a 0 N N N a N - a N - - f--;oJ N N N N -T ~ '-D 00 - -",l 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 '" ~ >> >>"" c .a "'" o " U;;; ~"R '0;:0 u :: w.. - u " "- .5 .~ ;;; 1:: o "- ~ c '" " f-- u .E ,^ .!l " G o ~ ;Z "<I"" ~o :::~ q t: ,,-g c;,; ;] "" u C " 0=;0 <("'~ 00'" _,0..... ,,~ _0 'en E 2;~ ..$roQ) -::>0> ro~ro '0.00.. cCl) <J!ll.. OJ <( III Q) .;: o C) Q) - III () Q) Q) LL. - (J III ~ Co -g E ::l-o .5 Q) -- l:: (J o Q) (J- ~Q) NC/) ... Q) 0 -- .c III III Q) I-C) l:: III ..r:: () I- :lE > - l:: Q) (J ... Q) ll. ~ ~ "" "'U 1-<::> -... ... :;: I-< '" 0: '0 .oJ u .5~ ... u o il , ~ ,'0 ""'" ~ .-::: a ~ ~E :.e ';jj c ~ :0 3 c o '" ~ " , " " 8 ... o '0 " o -5 .8 'of. "., "( '";; o o 0, .5 ;, > '0 Cl ~ .~ ~ </l '" = " co N '" ::::(; o c ~ .g ~ ~ ~ 1l ~ ... u 0 8 = ... 0 o "r;j "2 .u ~ .S -5 " .5 1: o 3 Cil ~ '&'0 ~ ~ ~ r-- .s,s 0'0 " " '0 ~ " ~ ::0 u ~ .S 'a.....l c I-< o u ~ (5 0 :::: ='" .~ -8 3 '" '-'0 ;;f- o-a ==:8 _ N . " R~ -a ] .~ c:..t3 .g "g :..0........ '" ~ o ~ 'ijj u.l.-3 t: .5 ~ ~ --5 '0.8 ~ u "<Ii ~ ;>.'0 ~~ """ EPE :.013 ] ~ ~ ~ - " o '0 " .J 'Of- a?- . "., " ;>." -,,'0 ~ --g .~ en vi Vl '"0 en o U ~ .3 ~ o ~ u CI:l:.a ~ :::I :::: C':I.3 V; .- ~ Vl ~'C 1ZJ V 0 U I-G:f- - </l &~ .,; z .,; z " ~ " u ~ " 5 il ~ u '" C E " ~ " '" .f' -a " Ct " u > E ~ ~ :c ~ '" N ~ '" ;>. 0'0 o .8 oVO 02 ".g ~ 0.. o~ U g "" u '" 0. E o .3 " t o 0. ~ o '" ~ O? ~ '" .D '" " '0 00 " ;;--;; = " V) @ .J;S "" ~ <r:~ ti " ><: .5 :.:0 Oil o 0 1:L'" 0.0 <C .~ " '" ~8 ~o. r; ;!l ~ ~ ~ ~ .3f-< '" </l 4-< 2 P::: [11 0 ~:= ~.~ B 6.9 'I: t1 .~ .:: ~ E-o'~ <ii CSt> ~u.s c:: ...... Q.) C':I ~ OJ-:=: Z l- I o b.O..... ,g c a1 0.. ~ 5 v.3 p:; 'C ~ u 0..:-::: E-< 0.. ~ 'C "'0 -g I 't: 0... r- fJ..l o t- I l.s r:~If-(/)r- gj(j......:zu~ lJ.... t- ~-q:l... f-< _ "" 'of. ") ... 00 o o 0, u ,S "' " '" '0 o ~ 00 ~ 0(1"" o o '" ~ " .D 8 " u " o ~ " .:: q l~ '0 o f=: ;$; 0; '" '0 Z Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 120 of 191 Interstate and Toll Facilitv Disconnt Factor This variable is used to recognize that Interstate highway and toll facility improvements are funded by the State using earmarked State and Federal funds. Typically, impact fees are not used to pay for these improvements and the portion of travel occurring on the interstate/toll facility system is usually eliminated from the total travel for each use. Currently, 1-75 is the only interstate running through the County. As shown in Table 3, based on the data from the 2030 Lee/Collier Transportation Planning model, the vehicle miles of travel (VMT) on 1-75 relative to the total VMT on the entire functionally classified roadway network was calculated using the base year 2000 model output and projected growth in terms of new development fTOm the 2030 Financially Feasible Plan FSUTMS Model output. The 2008 interpolated VMT resulted in an adjustment factor of approximately 8 percent due to travel on 1-75, which was consistent with the 2000 and 2030 model output. Thus, an interstate and toll facility discount factor of 8.4 percent will be applied to the impact fee calculation. TIle adjustment factor excludes externaI-to-extemal trips, which represent traffic that goes through Collier County, but does not stop in the County. This traffic is excluded from the calculations since it does not come from the development within the County. Table 3 shows the calculation of this figure. This factor is used to reduce vehicle miles of travel that the impact fee charges for each land use. Table 3 Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor (1) Facility VMT excluding EE Trips 2000 2008 2030 Interstate 75 425,1 '4 690,895 1,353,310 Other Roads 5.207.475 7.485.682 ]4.567.99] All Roads 5.632.629 8,176.577 ]5.921.30] % of Travel (1-75) 7.Yi~ 8.4% 8.5% (I) Source: 2030 Lee/Collier Transportation Plannlllg FSUTMS Model Cost Component Construction costs increased significantly in Florida and in Collier County between 2005 and 2007 due to additional construction demand caused by hurricanes, the housing market growth, and other factors. Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher right-of-way (ROW) costs over the last several years. In early 2008, costs started to stabilize, and most recently, some communities started to experience a decrease in costs. Infonnation from Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 9 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 121 of 191 Collier County, roadway cost information from other counties in Florida, and from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was used to develop a unit cost for all phases involved in the construction of one lane mile of roadway capacity. The following subsections summarize the methodology and findings of the total unit cost analysis for county and state roads. Appendix B provides the data and other support information utilized in these analyses. County Costs This section examines the ROWand construction costs associated with county roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in Collier County. For this purpose, recent bid data for on-going projects provided by the county and recent construction bid data from county roadway projects in Florida were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for county roadway improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into eight phases: design, ROW, construction, construction engineering/inspection (CEl), utilities, mitigation, interchange, and carrying costs. Based on recent trends for completed projects in Collier County, design costs were estimated at seven percent and CEl costs were estimated at six percent of construction costs. Appendix B, Table B-6 presents the results of the review conducted to recommend these percentages. Riehl-of-Wav (ROW) The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along the corridor that was necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen or in the case of new construction to build the road. Based on the local data, a ROW cost of$1.3 million per lane mile was used for county roadway projects with urban design characteristics. Appendix B, Table B- I provides a detailed description of ule projects analyzed. Based on discussions with County staff, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the County will build in the future will have urban design characteristics. Construction A review of recent construction cost data for Collier County shows that the County had two urban roadway design projects bid in 2007. A review of recent projects let in 2007 and 2008 in other Florida counties identified 12 urban design bid projects ranging from approximately $1.7 to $4.2 million per lane mile. Based on the local and statewide Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 10 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 122 of 191 project data, a construction cost per lane mile of $3.1 million was used for urban design roadway projects. By only using data points from the past two years, the cost per lane mile reflects the recent trend of decreased costs. Appendix B, Table B-2 provides a detailed description of the projects analyzed. Based on discussions with County Staff, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the County will build in the future will have urban design characteristics. Other Cost Components The unit cost per lane mile for county roads in Collier County also includes updated utilities, mitigation, interchange and carrying costs associated with capacity expansion projects. Utilities and mitigation cost estimates were developed based on four recently bid lane widening projects in Collier County. As shown in Appendix B, Table B-3, the utilities cost is approximately $455,000 per lane mile and as shown in Table B-4, the mitigation cost is approximately $99,000 per lane mile for county roads. Interchange cost estimates were developed based on two (2) planned interchange/grade separation projects in Collier County that are expected to be completed by 2030. These projects consist of improvements at the intersection of 1-75, CR 95 I and Davis Boulevard and where the US 41 (Tamiami Trail) meets CR 951. The total interchange cost provided by the Collier County Transp0l1ation Planning Department is $283.36 million. This figure was then divided by the total lane miles being built in the 2030 LRTP Financially Feasible Constrained Plan (434.7 lane miles). As shown in Table 4, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000. The lane mile cost includes an update to the carrying cost that tends to occur willIe a roadway is being built (approximately a 6-year process for County projects). As presented in Table 4, the carrying cost per lane mile is estimated at $259,000 based on the time table provided by the county for each phase. This figure takes into consideration the fact that the County receives some of the impact fees up front. As shown in Table 4, the total cost per lane mile for county roadway projects is estimated at approximately $6.3 million. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 1t Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 123 of 191 Table 4 Estimated Cost per lane Mile by County Project Phase Cost Per Lane \ LY\":>i Mlle:/,::S:":" Oesign(l) $217,000 Right-of-Way(2) $1,300,000 Constructionl]) $3,100,000 CEIl') $186,000 Utilitiesl') $455,000 Mitigation(6) $99,000 lnterchange(7) $652,000 Carrying!') $259,000 Total Cost $6.268,000 (1) Design percentage from Appendix B, Tahle B-6 multiplied by construction cost (Item 3) (2) Source: Appendix B, Table B-1 (3) Source: Appendix B, Table B-2 (4) CEf percentage from Appendix B, Table B-6 muttiplied by construction cost (Item 3) (5) Source: Appendix B, Table B-3 (6) Source: Appendix B, Table B-4 (7) Source: Appendix B, Table B-7 (8) Source: Appendix B, Table B-8 State Costs This section examines the ROWand construction costs associated with state roads related to transportation capacity improvements in Collier County. For this purpose, the ~istrict I FOOT Work Programs provided local ROW acquisition and cost estimates. In addition, recent construction bid and ROW acquisition data from state roadway projects elsewhere in Florida were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for roadway improvements. Similar to the county cost analysis, the cost for each state roadway capacity project was separated into seven phases: design, ROW, construction, CEl, mitigation, interchange, and carrying costs. Based on a review of the design and CEI costs for state roads, it was determined that the relationship between design, CEI and construction costs have not changed since the 2006 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 12 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 124 of 191 update study. Therefore, the design and CEI costs were estimated at ten percent of construction costs. Rif!ht-o(-Wav (ROW) FDOT has not recently acquired ROW for any lane widening projects in Collier County. Based on discussions with FDOT and Collier County, it has been determined that the ROW acquisition cost for state roads is equivalent to that of county roads. Therefore, a ROW acquisition cost of $1.3 million is used to calculate the unit cost per lane mile of an urban design state road. Based on discussions with FDOT, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the State will build in the future in Collier County will have urban desi,,'11 characteristics. A review of the lane widening projects along SR 84 in the 5-year plan confinned that only urban design projects are being considered. Construction A review of construction cost data for state roads in Collier County shows two future estimates for urban design lane widening projects. However, at approximately $4.9 million per lane mile, these projects do not reflect the current downward trend in costs. Because there were not any recent local bids to reflect morc accurate cost estimates, a review of recent bid projects in other Florida counties was conducted. Based on this review, a total of nine recently bid urban design roadway projects were identified, with an average cost of $3.2 million per lane mile. Appendix B, Table B-5 provides a detailed description of the projects analyzed. Based on discussions with FDOT, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the State will build in the future will have urban design characteristics. Other Cost Comvonents The unit cost per lane mile for state roads in Collier County also includes updated utilities, mitigation, interchange, and carrying costs associated with capacity expansion projects. Since no data was available for mitigation costs of state roads, the mitigation cost for county roads was used (Appendix B, Table B-4). Also, the state road construction cost estimate presented in Table 5 does not include utility cost due to the fact that the Collier County Water-Sewer District pays for utility relocation costs associated with state facilities. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 13 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 125 of 191 As with county roads, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000 for state roads. Appendix B, Table B-7 provides more detaiL In addition, the lane mile cost includes carrying cost that tends to occur while a roadway is being built (approximately a 7- or 8-year process for State projects). As presented in Table 5, the carrying cost per lane mile is approximately $264,000 based on the cost components associated with constructing a state roadway. This figure takes into consideration the fact that the County receives some of the impact fee revenues (that charge for travel on all roads) up front. As shown in Table 5, the total cost per lane mile for is estimated at approximately $6.2 million. Table 5 Estimated Cost per lane Mile by State Project Phase C~st Ph~se CosHer Lane '. . Mile Design!!) $320_000 Right-of-Wa/2) $1,300,000 Construction13) $3,200,000 CEl'4) $320,000 Utilities(5) $0 Mitigation(6) $99,000 Interchanae(7) $652,000 b Carrying") $264,000 Total Cost $6,155,000 (1) Design is estimated at 10% of construction cost... based on the 2006 update study and recent statewide trends. (2) Sourcc: Appendix B, Table B,I (3) Source: Appendix B, Tahle B-5 (4) CEI is estimated at 10% of construction costs based on the 2006 update study and recent statewide trends. (5) Note that the ColtierCounty Water- Sewer District pays for utility relocation costs associated with state projects. (6) Since state data on mitigation cost was not available, to be conservative, the mitigation cost for county roads was used. (7) Source: Appendix B, Table B-7 (8) Source: Appendix B, Table B-9 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 14 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 126 of 191 Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analvsis) The weighted average cost per lane mile for county and state roads is calculated and presented in Table 6. The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $6.3 million per lane mile will be utilized in the calculation of the impact fee schedule. This weighted average cost per lane mile includes county and state projects and is based on weighting the lane miles of programmed future roadway improvements included in the 2030 LR TP Financially Feasible Constrained Plan. As noted previously, the project infonnation and methodology used in these calculations are included in Appendix B. Table 6 Estimated Cost per Lane Mile for County and State Roadway Projects in Collier County Cost Type ,County. State County and I.. Rliads(l) I Ro~lis(2) State Roads(3) Design $217,000 $320,000 $228,330 Right-of-Way $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Construction $3,1 00,000 $3,200,000 $3,111,000 CEI $186,000 $320,000 $200,740 Utilities $455,000 $0 $404,950 Mitigation $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 Interchange $652,000 $652,000 $652,000 Carrying $259,000 $264.000 $259.550 Total $6,268,000 $6,155,000 $6,255,570 Lane Mile Distribution (4) 89% 11 ~/~ 100o/" (I) Source: Tab]e 4 (2) Source: Table 5 (3) Lane mile disb'ibution (Item 4), multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, eEl, utilities, mitigation, interchange and carrying phase cost<;; by jurisdiction to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile (4) Source: Appendix B, Table B-]O, Items (a) and (b) Capacity Added per Lane Mile An additional componcnt of the impact fee cquation is the capacity added per lane mile (also known as maximum service volume added per lane mile) of roadway constructed. An analysis of 2030 LRTP Financially Feasible Constrained Plan projects (see Appendix B, Table B-] 0 for the list of projects) was conducted to reflect the mix of improvements that Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Decemher 2008 15 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 127 of 191 will yield the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) that will be built in Collier COllilty. The resulting weighted average capacity per lane mile calculated based on these projects is 10,217, which is consistent with the capacity figure in the 2006 Update Study (10,901). Table 7 Weighted Average Capacity per Lane Mile '. . Lane Miles' '+;,:,(y' """.<:.- (ijY.'.:' " . Added 388.20 46.50 434.70 ,. Vehicle Miles of CanacitV Added(2) 3,762,928 678546 4,441,474 VMC Added per, , Lane Mi1e(~) , 9,693 14,592 . ", County State Total Weighted Average Capacity Added(4) 10,217 (I) Appendix B, Table B-I0, Items (a) and (b) and for the lane miles added column (2) Appendix B, Table B-IO, Items (c) and (d) (3) Vehicle miles of capacity added (Item 2) divided by lane miles added (Item I) (4) Total vehicle miles of capacity added for county and state roads (Item 2) divided by total lane miles added (Item 1) Cost ner Vehicle Mile of Capacitv Added The impact fee cost per unit of development is assessed based on the cost per vehicle mile of capacity. As shown in Tables 4, 5, and 7, the cost and capacity for county and state roads have been calculated based on typical roadway improvements. In order to estimate the weighted average cost per vehicle mile of capacity, the cost per VMC for county and state roads was weighted by the lane mile distribution of projects in the 2030 LR TP Financially Feasible Constrained Plan. As shown in Table 8, the cost per vehicle mile of capacity for travel on all roads within Collier County is $612.27. This weighted average cost per vehicle mile of capacity figure is used in the impact fee calculation to determine the total impact cost per unit of development based on the vehicle miles of travel consumed. For each vehicle mile of travel that is added to the road system, over $610 of roadway capacity is consumed. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 16 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 128 of 191 Table 8 Weighted Average Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added for County and State Roadways in Collier County , " .', ..',''-' ,.~\,., ,', ",;C; ~,:: Cost p"!" Lane '~~7!"';~~,~s~t~fJ~~~ ,Av~rageCapa~i~ . Cost per . Added Per L~lte ' hv':{;::,\4' ;;-><:",,' "':'-":';'::-,;',:.iW /)~~':;-VMC~f):';t:'. ".,. Mile(!) ,. ";. County Roads $6,268,000 9,693 State Roads $6,155,000 14,592 Wei"hted Average $6,255,570 10,217 (1) Source: Tabte 4 for county roads and Table 5 for state roads (2) Source: Table 7 (3) Cost per lane mile (Item 1) divided by average capacity added per lane mile (Item 2) for county and state roads respectively $646.65 $421.81 $612,27 Table 9 compares the calculated cost per vehicle mile of level of capacity added to the VMC ITom the January 1,2008 adopted value. As shown in the table, the cost per VMC has decreased primarily because of the decrease total cost per lane mile. Table 9 Cost per Vehicle Mile of Capacity Added Comparison '. Cost per Source , " VMC 2007 Collier (Indexed)ll) $750.60 2008 Collier County Report(2) $612.27 (I) Source: 2006 Collier County TranspOltation Impact Fee Update Study with an approximate 30 percent increase applied through the indexed fee schedule adopted January I, 200S. (2) Source: Table 8 Credit Component Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit The present value of the portion of gasoline taxes generated by a new development over a 25-year period that is expended on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost of the system consumed by travel associated with new development. Tindale-Oliver & Associales, Inc. December 2008 17 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 129 of 191 County In the current impact fee calculation, the credit calculation estimated 13.3 pennies from the county managed gas tax revenues that were used for roadway capacity adding improvements. For purposes of the Update Study, a review of the County's FY 2009-2013 Transportation Work Program indicates that a combination of gas tax revenues, impact fees, grants, and ad valorem taxes are used to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. Collier County receives a credit of 4.9 pennies for the portion of gas tax revenues dedicated to capacity expansion projects in the 5-year work program and 9.6 pennies for debt service payments on the 2005 gas tax revenue bond. Based on discussion with County staff, all bond proceeds were expended on roadway capacity expansion projects. In addition to the gas tax and debt service, approximately $20 million of grant funds (totaling 2.8 equivalent pennies) are being used to fund roadway expansion projects. Thus, a credit of 17.3 equivalent pennies will be given for the allocation of funds the county collects in gas tax revenues and grants. State In addition, state expenditures on state roads were reviewed and a credit for the capacity expansion portion attributable to state projects was provided. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to fund state projects was determined using information for a 17-year period of the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) Work Program (1997 through 2013). A list of capacity-adding roadway projects was developed including lane additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal projects, and other capacity-addition projects. Major roadway expansion projects along US 41, SR 84, SR 951, and CR 951 were included in this list as well as the major interchange improvements at 1-75 and the Golden Gate Parkway. This review (which is summarized in Appendix C, Table C-3) indicates that FOOT spending generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 13.5 pennies of gas tax revenue annually. The use of a 17- year period for purposes of developing a state credit for roadway capacity-adding projects results in a conservative credit for Collier County. The state gas tax credit is also reflected in Table 10. In summary, the County contributes approximately 17.3 pennies toward roadway capacity expansion projects, while state spending is equivalent to an average of 13.5 pennies for state roadway projects in Collier County. Therefore, a total of 30.8 pennies of credit is included in the impact fee equation to reCOb'Ilize the future capital revenue that is expected to be generated by new development from all non-impact fee revenues. All non-impact fee Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 18 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 130 of 191 revenues have been converted to equivalent gas tax pennies for purposes of estimating the revenue credit per unit of development. Table 10 Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue Equivalent Pennies. State Gas Tax Credit(1) County Gas Tax Credit(2) Total (I) Source: Appendix C, Table C-3 (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C,2 $0.135 $0.]73 $0.308 Ad Valorem Credit The financing plan developed for the next five years (FY 2009-2013 Five Year Work Program) includes the nse of a portion of the ad valorem revenues to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. Of the ad valorem revenues available for transportation, approximately $29.9 million will be used to fund capacity-adding projects over the next five years. This is equivalent to approximately $6.0 million of ad valorem revenues being dedicated to roadway capacity expansion annually. The value per I-mil provided by Collier County Transportation Department Staff is $82.8 million. Thus the percent mileage used towards capacity expansion annually is seven (7) percent ($6.0 million divided by $82.8 million). It should be noted that, based on discussions with County representatives, the total ad valorem revenues used towards transponation capacity projects will be fixed at $6.0 million per year. As such, as the tax base increases, the percent used for capacity projects will decrease. Sinee ad valorem revenues are going to be used to fund a portion of the five-year program, a credit is given. Credit due to ad valorem tax revenues for residential uses is calculated based on a review of recent sale prices of single family homes in Collier County from the Property Appraiser's database. The ad valorem tax revenues for non-residential uses are based on recent sale prices and taxable values of ofiice, industrial, and commercial properties in Collier County and estimated unit values from the Cousultant's experience in other jurisdictions and industry knowledge. An explanation of the methodology used to estimate ad valorem tax credit figures is included in Appendix D. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 19 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 131 of 191 Present Worth Variables Facility Life The roadway facility life used in the impact fee analysis is 25 years, which represents the reasonable life of the roadway. Interest Rate This is the discount rate at which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to compute the present value of the gasoline taxes generated by new development. The discount rate of 4.5 percent was determined based on recent bonds used to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. Fuel Efficiencv The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet of motor vehicles was estimated using the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated with a particular land use. Appendix C, Table C-9, documents the calculation of fuel efficiency value, based on the following equation, where "VMT" is vehicle miles oftravet and "MPG" is fuel efficiency in tenns of miles per gallon. 'ffi ." ,,[ VMTV,h>", 7,p' J Fuel E;. IClcncy = L- VMTRoadway Type -;- ~ -..., . MP(JVehicle Tvpe Roar/H!ay Type The methodology utilizes non-interstate VMT and average fuel efficiency data for passenger vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicles, such as vans, pickups, and SUVs) and large trucks (i.e., single-unit, 2-axle, 6-tire or more trucks and combination trucks) to calculate the total gallons of fuel utilized by each oftbese vehicle types. The combined total VMT for the vehicle types is then divided by the combined total gallons of fuel consumed to calculate, in effect, a "weighted" fuel efficiency value that appropriately accounts for the existing fleet mix of traffic on non-interstate roadways. The VMT and average fuel efficiency data were obtained from the most recent Federal Highway Administration's Highway Statistics 2006. Based on the calculation completed Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 20 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 132 of 191 in Appendix C, Table C-9, the fuel efficiency rate to be used in the updated impact fee equation is 17.85 miles per gallon. Effective Davs per Year An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the proposed fee. However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on weekdays (e.g., office buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of365 days per year, therefore, provides a IIconservative" element, ensuring that gasoline taxes are adequately credited against the fee. As a result, no changes to the effective days per year are proposed in this update. Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule The impact fee calculations for each land use (by impact fee district) are included in Appendix F. This Appendix includes the major land use categories and the impact fees for the individual land uses contained in each of the major categories. For each land use, this Appendix illustrates the impact fee demand component variables (trip rate, trip length, and percent of new trips), the total impact fee cost, the annual gas tax credit and present value of the gas tax credit, the net impact fee, the current Collier County impact fee, and the percent difference between the calculated impact fee and the current impact fee. It should be noted that the net impact fee illustrated in Appendix F is not necessarily a recommended fee, hut instead represents the most reasonable and legally defensible impact fee per unit of land use that could be charged in Collier County. As discussed throughout the report, the impact fce analysis has heen completed using a conservative approach to develop the impact fee per unit ofland use. For clarification purposes, it may be useful to walk through the calculation of an impact fee for one of the land use categories. In the following example, the net impact fee is calculated for the single-family residential detached (1,501 to 2,499 s.f.) land use category (ITE LUC 210) using information from the proposed impact fee schedule included in Appendix F, Table F-l. For each land use category, the following equations are utilized to calculate the net impact fee: Net Impact Fee = Total Impact Cost- Gas Tax Credit Where: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 21 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 133 of 191 Total Impact Cost = ((Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips) /2) x (J - Interstate/Toll Facility Ad). Factor) x (Cost per Lane Mile / Avg. Capacity Added per Lane Mile) Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given 4.5% interest rate & 25-year fad!i(v hfe Annual Gas Tax = (((Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % Nell' Trips) /2) x Effective Days per Year x $/Gallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes of this example, brief definitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs, along with the actual inputs used in the calculation of the single-family detached (1,501 to 2,499 s.f.) residential land use category: . Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.81) . Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle-miles (6.62) . Total Trip Length = the recommended trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile, which is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for travel on all roads including local roads (6.62 + 0.50 "" 7.12) . % New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on.the roadway (1 00%) . Divide by 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e., rate*length*% new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting of travel generated among land use codes since every trip has an origin and a destination. . Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor = discount factor to account for the travel demand occurring on interstate highways and/or to1\ facilities (8.4%) . Cost per Lane Mile = unit cost to construct one lane mile of roadway, in Sl1ane-mile ($6,255,570) . A\!erage Capacity Added per Lane Mile = represents the average daily traffic on one travel lane at capacity for one lane mile of road way, in vchielesllane-miJe/day (1 0,217) . Present Value = calculation ofthc present value ofa uniform series of ca"h flows, gas tax payments in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;" for 4.5% interest and a 25-year facility life, the unifonn series present worth factor is 14.8282 . Effective Days per Year = 365 days . $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital improvements, in $/gallon (SO.308) . Fuel Efficiency = average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (17.85) Using these inputs, a net impact fee can be calculated for the single-family residential detached (1,501 to 2,499 s.f.) land use category as follows. Total Impact Cost = ((7.81 * 6.62 * 1.0) /2) * (I - 0.084) * ($6,255,570/1 0,217) ~ $14,498 Annual Gas Tax = (((7.81 * 7.12 * l.0) /2) * 365 * $0.308) /17.85 = $175 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 22 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 134 of 191 Gas Tax Credit = $175 * 14.8282 = $2,595 Ad Valorem Credit ~ $143 Net Impact Fee = $14,498 - $2,595 - $143 ~ $11,760 The complete fee schedule by land use is included in Appendix F, Table F- I Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in developing the Collier County transportation impact fee program, a comparison of other transportation impact fee schedules was completed. Table II presents the comparison of transportation impact fees in the surrounding jnrisdictions and other peer jurisdictions in Florida. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 23 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study <(o>~ 00," .~~ J~ ,0 ~"' ~'" E ",~ 200ID -::>0> ",~C1l 'ODD.. C(j) (l)LL OJ <( c: o III .~ ~ Q, E o u " :; 'tl " .c: o ::'" .! ~ J:lu. ~t) .. Q, .s c: o '" .. ~ o Q, III c: .. ~ >- "E; . l> '" d t . "'d = e, Q to> 'C ~ :E . ><_,._1;.,) ~'~::" iii"b = ~ -,' '= ],~ ,',,""(:::.-., n. :g.",,; .,.>;t.;;l Qj ~C ~ ; . U ~-1 ~ <:I U ~ 8 -to> ; ~ .. . u =: -.1:> . = .. i: u ~,,~ . .. . ~ u . - .. s.; a~ l>~ ii'=--" . ~ ~ ~ . .. =~ d i ~. - 'o'~ 58 0' ~ 00 flQ ~ O' 00 ;;0 or, 'o~ ,",0 NO -Do!? ,",0 NO ~~ r-- ,=> ~g ""'0' ~s 00 ci~ 00 F;O ~ O' ~g " ~ 5 ;;1 i:J :::J ~ ~~ _ c '~ ~ 8~ ~ . .{ " ~ ~ B [50.> ~ ^ "Cij" ~ "'C -;; 0> ;':I bS :5~ ~ ~ .~''3 ~ g ~ .? ~ ~ E ~ :~ ~ "' .~- ~ ~ :~ Q "=' :: ~:l! O:Jl E-c6 g,~ ~~ <t: .. ~ ~ 1i;:j ::.. VI ~ J1~~ ~[E~~ I ~8 ~~~t~ ~ E~ ~c /ig.,~ t:: ~.::.'" fr.~_-'o~ =_- u, .;::;:: <5 "" ~ ~ .~ ~ ] ~ ~ I i ~, ~ [ o ,~~.3:g",CCIJ~5 -3 z -'~ e.gJ~g~o 1> ~1)~::;O~:::: ~ j~ ~'=_~cliHl~i ~ _~.::. ..:-::15..2aviSo::l ~ ;-,"-::3 sr.; ~";,OE'~~~ g 5~3:;g.:::S~'6~oi3U '-''0''>::"0';::'.8 15 :l (...;02 u e."'2 ~ ~ ~ : ~ ""2 ~ 3 '€ ~ _~ E. ~ ~~~ ..~]~~~~~.~~ ~ 2 ~ OJ ~ g 2 2 2 2 ~ [ 5 5gi5o]g56555~a .~ ~ VlVJlFJZf- '-'~~~::~ u-. ~ ~ 325: ~ ~~t:.e?2 s M ~ M " ~ :::~O' ZO~ .rl'r> ~ M ~ ~ ~ o '" ~ t- F'l or, -.0 ('-1"'.1 '..0 '..0 r- - 0 eJ', "... M I"f 1"1 or: ~ r-" lA lA Vl b'; ~ N o ~ ~ r-oo :=>r- O'.."..r-..oo r- ~ 0' OC \0 ",rr-: .6r-: Vl "'" ..".. (A 1"1 ~ ~ M ~ ~ c, ~ ,...-, ~ N ':=> 00 :=>M 1"1M "T '" M "T'n "r ......, nO X; ..; V'l b"l""" VI_ ~ ~ ~ c, "' ~ g::~~o~ "'1""" 0 _ 'n ...6r-:or:..r:"," VI lA ..".. "1 lAV,(F} ~ ~ "T ~ r-.....-, '.or-r- or\ 'x> 0 r- 0 00 r- r~ ril"l r-: ri N~ Vl VI- lA ~ ~ 0' ~ "' ~ '..0 N 00 00 N 'n oc on r'l on 0' .."..1"1......'r- ri"; ,...-;- 00""". Vl<>'J on ""'''' ~ ~ ~ ~ N '" ~ on 0 'r, ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~. "'1"1 "T "'" '" ..0 ..".. '..0 'n r-r-"t ..0 r-" ..o~ r-. 00 0- Vl _ '" -..".. Vl _ V, VI ~ ~ M :;.t ..0 or,.."....o..o r- r- eJ', CY~ "i" C:=>..".. or, o\O--~I)'~' <A N r-- -:=> VI - Vl- ~ ~ o u <r. ",'-<;;;'<;;";j; 000 000 =>c;.c;. gg o~ :=.; '" o .E f- o e :::- g o o o d u " ~ o " U C;, .~ ~ ~ ~ _ t..:.. "" '" ~ 'i' ::: ~ ~ ~Vi?: "3 '" C :::l f:l,-.. "':l '" 5 .E::=> oJ _ => ;;; ~~:::: .-; or,"':l - V 0 ~ "~ ~ 1;) or. '-'OJ: 0- ~ ~ I"~ "1 ''-' '" ~ 0' ~ ~ ;; u c . u .= " '" ~ . ~ o 1< g N " o . .~ -< " u i c: ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 . >. " " o '5 6 c ~ " c o ] D 1< o '" 2 ] Q, it o ~ D . D o ,s ~ c .~ ~ .= ~ o " o . " ~ o '" o ,s . ,s " " Z 3 B " " . " o Z ~ o u ~ u .= ,,..,\0 "' ~ rrSO:: ~ 0' ~ ~ o :5 0'= o " ~ .E: "I e " ~ o ~ ~ " .~ o ] -" ~ ;J ~ " o o ,s "' U " ~ ~ o ;; " '" -g ~ " .~ o u .= " f' I " E'] ~'" u " ~~ ':'::; e>- 0:0 W ~ '" "' 'li o o ~ I u c . o ! c .~ ~ " c . f- ~ '" o . .~ ~ .~ ~ o ~ . g ~ .~ ~ o ,g 15. E ~ o .. o c .5 ~ o 3 " ~ D ~ o " 3 " u ~ ~ o " . 5 ] ~ 1< " '" " o " ,; .. '~ o :5 ~ ;; ~ ~ " -= ~ N g .~ ~ " U .. ~ 6 c ~ " D ~ B o o U ,s '[; .~ g '5 . c o ] 0:: ~ ~ ~ ~ c; ] '" '.~ ~ < "00 'lg~ ~-@ .g ~ (.:0 Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 136 of 191 APPENDIX A Demand Component Calculation Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 137 of 191 Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 19 years. Data from these studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S. TOA estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a transportation impact fee schedule using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and tbe Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (7th edition). In instances, when both Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (7th edition) and Florida Studies trip generation rate (TGR) data are available for a particular land use, the data is blended together to increase tbe sample size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips generated per unit of development. If no Florida Studies data is available, only TGR data from the lTE reference report is used in the fee calculation. The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for non-residential land uses. The trip length information is obtained through origin-destination surveys that ask respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip length by land use. The percent new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origin- destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The percent new trip variable is then calculated as I minus the percentage of trips that are captured. TOA has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristicsfor Transportation Impact Fees, ITE Journal, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-I Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 138 of 191 Location 51'../11011. P,. Total # #Tril'l~'~lb TripG.n Tim< Period Trip PertcnlN...Tril" VM' Sour<< [m.....;'...' Int.n.;.... ROlf LeD~~h ';\VItU"-",C".';^ 11"]'-1>';' , ~I '4i) Ni'" 11 ,~ "roc"""." t,w,w'''''(".';A 11",p.I'.'J2 '4(1 " " ~'^ ','J' S"'"",,,,,"', """-~",C("H 7(, Jm>-~) " ", 111.111 f,,"' ,,' "'.1 ~ ,_~",C'"1D'" ""'-~,,.( " " '" j"o_"' "' '" '1.77 '.4'1 NJA '2.w """'''till""",,, ~~".C".l-1 I'S J,,,.~l " " '.11; -'''' " "_'\(1 ""'''>wi",,,,,,, ,...~",,( ". fl. IS! j,,,,,,,, V ,,' , .'~ n" N'A 1,,'1 "'..~..('",.. ,...~".( ". H I'J) J"".~l I:' I:' " ~~ 4.'" N,^ '1..'1 ,.m"," ,'""",, S"'.""'(".fL '" Ju""" , , ]'.1" '1~' N'^ ,\".m """~"" "UllIV ."""",".C".l-I ,'1 h,,>-~' 141, ,.. 1,'(,1 +-:-_. ''''' NJ^ ".<! 'i",.~,",('"U"'" ~.,.,~,'"( " " ,,, J',".~l "n 211i -1(, .<4" NiA '" " s,",,~,",C"'UllV f1crn,,,J,,(',, n " M'y.% '" '" '''''I ",- 0.< NiA J' .\~ j",d."-_Oh",,'" /I.,~~,,,,,. 11"",""",,(',, " 12~ M,,-% llt_' .!<l' " 'J,_I l>.i11 ", ~" 17 Im..k_OI='" A"'''~te< 11=.0...." " :12 '1.v--% 1<: )<2 -co '''H '.1'4 l'iA ,1(,A' lm..],_OI",,,,,,, A",,,,,,,,,,, 11<=.00,('" n ">1 M",--% '" ,,~ ><' ",,-I '.:' ~"A ").,~ Im""I,'IJI~'""'A",,,'''''<>; 0\",1""<(,,, " 1'" 'h~7 :'1' ", '/,-' '., N,'A 41." lm""o,.Ob",,,& A'~'C"L", ('I",,'(m<(,_ " 14, "c',_~7 -"' " ,,,-, ~.IU NiA ,J.)! 1",d.k_OI",-~& A'~''101o< C~"',",('".1l '_Ill '1I.',-~l ''', <,,, ,,,-, HU.\ N/A '-1m Imll,,"_OI,,"'-&A,",,',"'O< I'].""u;('" e, ~I ~ (11.,_'17 ,,, "Ij' '1"-; '.H' '" \4'J6 Ionll"I..OI""-",,, A",,,.,,,,,,, ('w.r"",C" H !.\7 (~'(-\'1 -- "" 'J"_~ , .., ".'A "-.!~ l'"'"'lt-{I]"...&A""",,",,, ('""".'<('" n 14,' '><;'_'J1 "m 'H I,,.. N'A ",.~, J",t,I.'-DI;\''-'f&A"""..,.. ('twr..."<\',,.H lr~' (~"-~, (,ljl 'J,_" <71' - N'-A '71,1 ]""\.Ic-~)h\,,,& A""",,,,,, (1J."'""\'''.I.1- ") '11.,_')7 ". .'4<' ~ --- 'm NiA 1,.llJ I""I"N.JI,,''''-&^'''''''''' Chn,\'n'('''.fl "' < ~"_~7 '.,' >:,,, "fl - N,'A "" 1""~'~)I"''''&A'''''''llil'''' '.1.,,~.,", C,,_ J-1 1.1(" "",_'17 ". ".'(1 "" ~/A , ~,.,,, 1",""k.IJI~'..-&A,~,,,.,,~ (-"11""(,,, " ., I""'.'" " J:'" " 114<1 NiA "-'.'12 l",d"I"Oln''''-&A"",,,,,''' ('"II,er(" H ~"f1 I"".'" "'J "'" " ',_I" 'liA ~'J": IUlI",k_OI",..-&A"""".. I~,d'" H '" A._'I! ;'(, 1,'(, 7,,_ HlJ" N'^ '''''' lu"",I".()I...'o,&A,."",,,,, 1..,,,(',, " " ^ -'I! :Ie """ ',,-~ 'r" N:A "I"'~' 1"';".,.01",,,& A""".,,,,, IJlkd 1'1 I,^ Aw.<I! "'" "H ,,_I, "" N.'A "",< ,,,,.."'01.,,,,,'" .~,~,'~'"" 1',,,,,,(., n ,~,,'."2 '.') '" >"-1 ':.Ie N'A ---- 1"""1"01",,,, & A,.,,,,,,,,, 1',,,,,,(',,. 1'[ ^' , "'2 "" '" ", ., >;,'A 1,'1" 1,,,",Ic-Oln'c<&A',,,,"''''' 1',,,,..,,(,, " " ,,>,.,,) ,,, "", >,. 1,,,, Ni,~ p", 1,",bk-I~"'l"T '" A,.""",~ l~"..('" 1'] " "~'l '" " "" N'A ",,) I""v.k-{~;",~&A'~'..,,", I'".",'" H " .~ ,,-,,~ :t,1 -.,, ,,-I "I'! N-'A 1,7m I,,,,~.I<-Oln"'-& ^'~""""" M>."m'" n "" A"-,,, 1(,) 'W "", '" N,'A III'"' K,ml,......Il,"""'A.~"",,,,, M,"'m{'" H I ,,~ , -m '''' ,.1" .. >i'A <,.,0 K\ml,......lIn",Oc^,.".",,,,, M"""n(" " "4 " ">: "" '.'4 "H ~; >;'A ,.", f.,mk"V-Il\""&^~~""",, ~"""," ( 1-1 l' ~ ~ ""'I~ ".' ".,-1, ," N..~ "WI f.,,,,I,'V-lI"m&^'~""",~ M,~.m( " " " _II:' C'''' " ,~ 'H, H, N..A "1.'1, K'mk",.lI"m"'A,~"",,,~ "",,(',, FI '" ,~.,-p' ,,~ " "", N:A ''',I~ 1l'...,ic_r>I"''''^'A"",'.'Ill"i I'Ltno:>(", " :'1 ,~,_", I" , ,H UC N.A --.- I'"""'.'JI~'",,,, A'~,,'""c~ ",,,,,,(', " ""' ".,-,11 , '" "" '" ."'A , " II> ,,,"",,'./,,"''-"'''^,,'''''''''' "lI"<<' " "M "",OJ '" "14 ~.-.~ I,-,.xl I "I<",I,'4)]n''-'I & """,,..,,'" 'm,,( 1'1 '74 '~'1''-'' C'." , -~ I", ",A ..1.(,: Im""k-<'II\"~'" ^"<<-""" 1"".(" n " I~~'_nl, .. ''', "'.' : ::::~::~:;:::~~~ ~::~:;;~ 1",,'1 1'1 , , 1",,<>(, ',,^ N'-.' ]""", H ,~ I",'"" ," 1:1>" II'.'" N,^ 11I'l. 1'"'\''''')1,,1:,''' A,~,","" I~J",( , FI ." ,,,,,'-!lo ,," " NiA ,~ 'I h"I"I,'-"ln~~ '" A'~,,'''''~~ IB....'.".n c"J ,~,,_Il^ ", ., "J' "'A I,'.if) Im,u,i,-Olt\''-'' "'!\_''''__'"'~~ Ik'ftULIld"{',, " .. , .Ii' '1(, , .-,~ " " ~'A I,'", Im"""""]o,.,,."'A,,,,,,,,,,, II,,,,,,,,",,,',, " '>' A""'" '" "" ,of, ", v.. "5' II"'~"'Oh"",!..- A""",,,,,, 1I,'dl,m~""" " '.' '" " .,,,,,-- ::~~- ~~~ '17' 1",,1.,k'()Il\d&A'~"L1"<> , I." Ii, NiA " .. Jm,I,,,,.I)I1"-~"II,~,,.,,,,,, ;;, -"'''''~ ,,.., "" , , 'r;' ,'.--A ~ 1'",I,l"'()ll\'er&.-',~"",,C~ '," M,,'_(~ >i'.~ 'J'J " .. -i;::~:::~;::::'::~~ i'"lh,~' 'I,,,.'" "" "'" S,A ",f.' " ~~,,-II, 'f' ,," '''''' N'A "',, W,.1l<Q .,- '" , . ~,'~ 52,) W b!<dA... Tn .. I~, ." Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE lUC 210) "0" '"'''1''' "OO"'IIJ<.'"'" "~I,,<l<>lm!lJ[J]Jllilf)'''''''LL''' y,.<ipb'''!A\'-'''I'' Ir~'("""''''''n ftirt, m':A"<fl'I!!<']nl'(;"""""""'lll'", A'~"'~'V~T Wc,"lnctl,\v,,"!<V\H " ~51 ;{,.J7 ~L70 Exolanation: A notable exception to the blending process is the single family n:sidentialland use. With over 55 study sites, the sample size for the single family land use is rather large and representative of current trip generating characteristics ofsing1c family residential dcvelopments in Florida, Since the data has been collected from sites over the past 10 to 20 years, it is morc current than ITE data and reflects more recent demographic ch,mges. For example, the average person per household has decreased from 3.14 in 1970 to 2.59 in the year 2000. indicating a reduction ill the number of average daily trips generated per dwelling unit. Tindale.Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 139 of 191 Anartment liTE Lue 220 Loallio.. Sl>.cI IJnll. D.te Tot.l# # Tripl..en~t" TrlpGc.. Tim. Trip r.ruII1N... VMT Sou,""" lllte",i..., II110rvio"'$ R.le Period UJ\j.<1h Trip, s..""",,,(',,,f1 21] )"0-9' .' " -'.1~ -'.~II NJA ,<,rl(. S""'~lliIl ,,"",v S,"'",,. Cu. I~ l~) I"".')' .t(, " H' II.'" "" (,'.If, "'.~'t"C,,\)Olv M'm"'(',, ~l 11.1 , ,~I; ['.' f" (,.~. H,t "' ,," K""",,_II,,mIcA,.<<'''''''' '-b..,,"('",11 24<> ^ rr~l, i74 1,. ,,'If, '.4' '" c'SJ Ku"tev.H..m& A"",,",c' M"m'llC",H ,,~ ^ ,,~.! 11.' 11.' ,r", <<; "' )141 Ki",b_ll"n,I<:A'~''''I.' Mn..""C,,F1 '" ^".I" 17~ 11' l.7' o.HH Ni^ 1'14, K,",I,",.H"m",^.~"'",., M"Mn(" H 'r~, , -I') 17(> 17" >46 ;.~4 N,'A ,1,4' K,mb-I!"",&/",,,,,"" !.nltcf'" " ,,,r> '>"'_'11, m I'; (..11 <.'J N.'A "7(, r,odulf'-OIl\'Of&^"'''"'"to:< IBl<e(\'.H. 1.<1 ])"".11' H,; !f,' 1\'11 ,_~2 "" '6-"1 ILDillllo.nl",erl< A,~",,,,,O' l~kcC". 1,1 1m 1""-'-11" 11) ''') ".I~' N"^ 4'._'4 ILtl&I'.'lI",er&^",>c'",O' 1",c'-'''.f1 ,y, j)"'~J" 1HI (,'4 01' "'^ 14,r,) 1,,,,",I<--OIi"c~It^,~.,,"'e< Ikm"",I..C".F1 'IC A "~,, '-", om <.'),- N.-'A :4'4 1",J"Jo.Oh'.,~1< A",,,,,,,,,,, Ik1,,,,,,",,(',,,!'1 1'(. A "~,, \)0 ,," 0.14 N!A 1,-1~ ImJ"k--Olov"ItA""",'Ie< ],.to1,,,,,, .1.4"' Mor. .., I.... Ill, 4.~1 ITE J.M(, W ~""A",r l'rl '" Illotloodtotol 5.1(,) W""",IA""Iljl,TnpC;""""H"" Kate [IE Avem~c 1rip Grncm""" Kal< Ilk.d"fI'LS'.d;e...dlTF.'~"'"ll<T,...Gc"<,"li".Il.": AVrnl~' VMT Wci,ll1edA\'cru,,,VMT' '" 6.71 '" 34_" )J 5~ Not." The 2." So..,,,,. ",,,Iy with 11_, mi TL "., 0.01",1<>0 r,oo, WOl!Oled Av"",~, 'I np L~..~~, ""k,,",I"'" Exnlanation: For the LUC 21 0 trip generation rate, a total of 13 sites (shown above) were blended with data from 86 sites in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 6.44 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. Residential CondominiumlTownhouse flTE LUe 2301 LoClltioa Sb,eI UnllS Date To'al# #Tril' L.n~'h Trll>G~n Time Trill Puren.N"", VMT Sm,n:e Intervle.... InlOniel\" R.t~ Period Len~th Trip. Ho","ud<'\','.H " M.....~(, " " ''.I' '''H, N'A (I.IX' ],,,,I,le'OJ.,,c1" ^,"~'""" 1l",,,O",, C". 1'1 12' M"v.<)(, '" ,,, 6." ''''-'" N'A ".m Im",I,'~Hiv,,"^,"~,"'o. 1'",,'"(''' 1'1 11' , '-11l '" I'," 4-" 'h,_" "'^ H.(KI Tm'~LI".Ohvc~" A,,,,,,,,,", P"",,,(',, " 24' ^,,_lIc J" '" C' ''''.'. '" I' I~' 1m,~,Hlh",," ^,~,",,'o. T",.IS",e "" ,- cT'l ,- "^ om 9~b'l 11'01 bted~v~ ." ,~ tb: ~IA HlemlooMuol W,I~ We'~b'ooAv"lBI'olnpGc",,,'hO" Kal. 1l'F ^v,,"~' Tri,>(;"""..1<>tl Ro'e HI.nd of~l. S.ud"" ODd lTE A..t.l< 'l'riI'G'n..~~o" I<~.., 4.~7 0.86 ~.fil ExnlanatlOn For the LUC 230 trip generation rate, a total of four (4) sites (shown above) were blended with data from 54 sites in the IrE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 5.81 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. Mobile Home Park ITE LUe 240\ Location SlzelUoU. !.late TOlal# # Tril' L<n~1h TrlpGen Time Trip P'r~~nt r;~w VMT SOl1r~~ Inlen'iowl lnl~rview. Rate Pe.iod L.n~lh Trill' ~l"m'''('" " ^' I"I-~I .. qr, 4>1", 1.!'J "'A I'" I,"dtli<'-(ll"',~,, A~,,,''''c, Mlni",,(',' " " ),,1.'11 " " Ill'" ?411, '.12 "iA 4'1.1,' l"H",ld)II\'c~ItA''''''''e' M",,,,,,(\ " 1'1 )"I_'!I .. .. ,. ?41" 4.<>' N.IA 1'.1' l,"u.le.Ol"'",,, A,,,~-,,,,c' "",,,,,,,,1\' " '" IUll-'P 1"11 111<1 '-'I -'.1" "'^ 11\1<' ~".~".( "'""'1 """,,,,.(',, n '1% In"_'}' 1'1 '" 4.1~ ..4,. N.-'A "" """~'"(''\m''' 110""""'"(''' 1-'1 I.,": ~k,""~(' ,!, '" , " '!"uH,"" '.1) ",' I'fl{, l",IoI,_"h"", &A,~"',"",, M"",."r-,. ]-'I '"' Au.": 1>7 '--'I ;JI" q~ N'A I'll' I(m,I",-Ho:>mI<A..""",,,, M"n",C" FI n A,u-!>: 1" 1.1(, c.l1, '.,1> '" ,'1.1" 1i:,",lev_II"'uI<A,~,,,,,,'''' ~b,w"( " ;~7 , ,_'I: 1"' n~ ,411r VI, Ni^ '7' f;.,ml",'.ll<,noIl:.A'M'''''''' I"["IS,,,, ',I!I 'm Trl ,- tit: 4.~~ Iff {,_"It .. b""'A"".. T., ,.. .b: 4.ftL 1lI..-.,J<:dl<,..1 1U,7UI Wc'~htooA,<..g<,l~V(;",'<M"",nR",", lILAvc""~" r"ph<llOl'",i<>" Rate 4.17 4,99 Exnlanation: For LUC 240, a total of nine (9) sites (shown above) were used to calculate the trip generation rate. This data was not blended with the lTE ih Edition Handbook because the HE data is measured per "occupied dwelling unit," while the Florida Studies data is measured per "dwelling unit." Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc, December 2008 A-3 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 140 of 191 LO<"dtion Slze/Unlts Oale Tolal# # Trip L.n~lh TripG.n Tim. Trip hrrenl 'ow \'~rr Sourte Inl<TYk... Ini.rvl..... R.t. hrlod Lonl!fh Tril" 1"c111lld.I'L r,' \':'-l.'c"" " " " ',m'" !.44 'n" ." 1"""1<,1,1,,,,,,& ^""~'"t"" ~lAn"" ('" n '"" , "-f), ,,' ,.,^ ?lh' '" N/A IlI,'4 ~m'I<,-llmn"^'''''''"te' M"",,,,C,, n '77 .~ ..Dc ~I") ~ .1 ~4n' <'#l I>I^ " " Kmll.,.J1nml< A,~"""" M""",(',,,FI 1."\4 , T_'" I" '.M ,4" (, (~t N.'^ " " K,rol, -lI",u& A'~'''''e< M,o",C,. H ,"", .\ ,,~I! ,." '"' !.In' ". " I',j_' 1\'",10....11<'",& ^,~"'..,., M,n,,"(';, CO .'i,l' A ,..~: '" '_'If c"r <R' NIA If,"< I,;lmo,,-_II""'-'^'''''UI1e< I""IS,,,,, ,..'n ,.. .lrl ~ ., 'M ITE (,"'4 .. h.od^ " ,- " ~.U Retirement Community/Age-Restricted Single Family (ITE LUC 251) Blended ",'"' I ~j II W"~b1<"""...!c'lrip(;"""n",,'" Rlil. ,.75 In^"cm~<Tnp(;cnc""""R.', \71 1I......."fFL~'"di....dln:,.,.".I'TTlpG....,..,.."......, J.lJ A,c,,,",VMT 14.2J W<L~III"'! A,'c",~, VMT 16.~6 Exnlanation: For the LUC 251 trip generation rate, a total of six (6) sites (shown above) were blended with data from seven (7) sites in the fTE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of3.13 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. I loe.linn I "I" I Tma.," Slzo/Unit. ,,"I< Inl.""'rw, Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) ( ITE LUC 253) 1'=1",,1",,'1'1 A"o_", I',""ll"l." n em 'k,_'" i<"lLIS".. cn ITI' 1$ B1OLld"" "",I .,m ~ hil' L.n~lh I TrlI'G.n [nlervle'" ---.l R~I. I" ".'1> Tlmo I Trip PrriGd L..n~b PcreoatN... I Trlt'l NIA '" Snnr<c I ",,,n-'.., :cc' ';"",-,' Ilndal,_llbv"c!..A",,"'''''' lu"...~OI"'cj'''-A'~'',"1<'' " W bt<dA.... Tn 1_ 2M l'Leo Mil "",~",<>l A,,,w'" Inp (,cnc",.,,, ilJo,< ITE Av"",~c 'Inr ("'"<10""" Role IIlcnd..IFl.S<..d;.,.....rn:A....I'.TdpG"'"..........., J.jtl c.02 W ExnlanatlOll For the LUC 253 trip generation rate, a total of two (2) sites (shown above) were blended with data from two (2) sites in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of2.25 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. loe.lion Si/_' flal. 101al# ~ Tei[, L.nl.>Th TripGrn Tim. TrIp P.rcen! r>;... VMT Soue.. muum.,) [ol.",';.,w.' Inlen;.,,', Ra'. Period L...,..lh hip. 1',11<11,,,,, 1'1 '" Oel_'" .. " iI,,,_, :."" 1,.'-" I',.,j"k' 'I",,,,~'.~ "'C""., 1'"",11",(,. " " '''''''" n te,,, qr, 1,"1> l.",~k-"In'.'& ^""""'e< 1'",ell"",, " I:" 0,'_'" Y. ',-' " "f. 1'",~k-rll'\'e'''A""G,,'', I'mel]""',, n I" A",'_'" '" IC'^ J:<I' ...,. '" "H' e" I "''"'k,_[II".c~/< .~,,,,,",", "",eI]",'" H II,l ",,.,4 ", " 0'(> {,)lI r'" :1.'" I LOd"I.-_rll"',,,/< .~",,",., 1<,,,,1,;,,, 5lH A......n( ,.. .., ,~ frIO "" "''0'.1 M...t..... .lri ... '" Hotel/Motel (ITE LUC 310 & 320) 11Icndcdhlllli 5,10 01 J" U',,~I",'," '"'".~" "'I' i",,"U, U',III>.' "",d Ie" ,I", II",,, "..1 .....' (1.([( ,1(>) f",.,l W,.,'l"<rtAv""~".[nr[;'.'"-'t.,,"" Ro,< In.Av<f'!,.Tnl'{;""m1H'''R.>I''-'ILI~.'1II) In ,h<ru"., loip G"",""",,,, R,o'"II_UC '10) .',9(1 '.17 5.63 Exnlanation: For LUC 310, data from two (2) hotels and three (3) motels \vas combined to calculate a weighted average trip length. LocallOll S"..,(Room. n.. Tolol# ~Tri]lIA'Oh"h IripGon lime Period Trip P~n;~Rt N"" Tnp. VMT ~ourr. In'.rview' Inle"'I...." I{.le unglh 1'""'U,,,C".ll " (Ie,_'" V. '. C.,O f'''.H 1',",j"ld)I"'"""",,,~,,,,,, l'm,lJ" , " " '" (Ie':~~ '.,;0 f,'J<J l,oo.le_"l1v,,"'I"~'''IL'''' ['","I..<{" " "(' l'c1'"" :f, " " '.Ih l;"dlli,_,)I"",,!-:,,~ 1",,,1,>= 221 ". '" IZQI[lb, 3.9J Wa ~, .Tri " .M Motel (ITE LUC 320) ",UlI<>lI"",,"'<,..lnp.',,'''''" G.b Wc'"b'"dAv=~,'loip("-""'","",I<n,< rn. Avcr""l"I'(;""""''''''' ka", V,) AI',"lI",'VMT W""h'," A""H"VMT IUI Exolanation: Due to a lack of trip generation rate data from the Florida Studies, lTE data was used to represent the TGR for LlJC 320. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-4 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 141 of 191 Movie Theater with Matinee (ITE LUC 444) I I Si"" I 0", I TnlaJ# #l'rlpl",COl!lh I TripGcn I Tim.' IT'll' pcn",n1Nc"IVMT I LOClltion (screen.ll lnten'le.., [nten',"'" R3IC I Period u,n~'h Trip. Source 1'11><[1"(:,,.1'1 ~ ,.~-,_~9 III II~ 11-'.1" !,^ '."1 "70 n'.ll rin(I.I,_O]"...~&A""c",," P",dl., ('",l1. 1~ Se'~~ III 11(' ('.'41' ',.i I~" ~j.\, 114.44 lt1ldJIle.OI"'cr&^"ocia",, 1ot,ISize 11' A.... Tn 1_ 1.30 HE l~ ","mlltod W.. .l1>dA.,. 1M I...n , 1..ll lll<<cdod'''toJ 30 "'"~htc~~<",,,,,, N"", Ln,'''''''''''," gn W"'~h'ed^"e,^!!"1npG<1lo"'t"''' 1<""" 8J.28 JTEAv","!<Trip(,rn""',,,"l4olo 1.\),1:1 BI..~ 011'1. ~........ ..d In: "'''''''Il<T.I" (;,..,o,j"o ibl<, IflMJ ^,.....'.VMT. 174_7'1 Wo1ghte""'cra~VMT; 207.84 I Exo]anatlOn' For the LUC 444 trip generation rate, a total of two (2) sites (shown above) were blended with data from one (1) site in the lTE 6th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 1 06.63 was used in calculating the transportation impact fce rate. Looation Sile(l.UOO Date T01.I~ ~ Tri[, Len~th 'hillGon Time Tri, PeroontNew \/MT SOllr"" '0 Interviews Int<.....iew. Rat. Period Loo~th T<II'~ 1',"cn"(",,.1'I 5.6 A",_'" 'ri ri M.on J,_f, I.~II 71J.1l ~~ .J(> li,,,",k~OIov,,1< ""~~""c' p,""n"("".n 10" ,",,'1 17'1 '" ({,'I'I J,_f 'Ill 7\.0 10,5' 1,,,",lc-l)lov,,"- ,.."'~""., I,m ,1'1 Mm'_N<, " " "!ill ~~ 11 Kllule,.II<>IIL&""""'"'''' 1,,,,,IS,"c 10.& '" " ,- W HI' ,(>Jl W.I ~..".^"".. Th ,- " U3 Day Care Center (ITE LUC 565) B1"",i<<It,,'ol 45.6 ""c'!h'e,II',~",,"'N"'" jnl'A"C'"iO 7J.2 w","l.,JAvor'ie]npO,"em"'LlI(Me; ITE^"""'iellipGOIIor"'X",l<a'< RI."d of Ft. S<"di.. ood IlTA'.r.K,'hlpG.."o/I<," Il...: Av",.goVMT W,""IL",JAv",.~,VMT' (,(,.9'9 7'!.2G ?~_07 n.ll! 111.56 ExoJanation: For the LUC 565 trip generation rate, a total of eleven (11) sites from the rTE 7th Edition Handbook were used to calculate the TGR. This data was not blended with the Florida Studies due to the fact that the Florida Studies sites were measured per "I ,000 sf," while Collier County charges the impact fee per "student." Tlltal# Interview, " # Trip L.n~th Inlerview, (,(, Trip l,encth Per<<nl~e.. Tri[>> "'-'I VMT Sonr"" 120 ill ,]5.U , ~(, 11,.4 l--'" Mer..Tril...b, 2.59 Woj hlD<lA",,", Tr] I..," Ill, 1~9 W,.;~hlcJ 1'<:,,",'" ~c.," In!, ^vm~o 8~_O W",~IIIe.JAvera!c'lripGOII"''''''o1<,.,,< n'li A,'CIlI~< TripGCllCIlltlO" RIole RI...d"IFLS"'d;..oodrn:,\v"..~.Trlpl;....n'I",'''''': Avcrn~<VMT' Wci!btoJ^"e:t~~cVMl "-'~ Imdale--()I,""&A~",o"",,, li6 2.J? 1.4~ 6.~9 ~ 12 ExolanatJOn For the LUC 620 trip generation rate, a total of one (1) site (shown above) Vias blended with data from five (5) sites in the lIE 7th Edition Handbook to inerease the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of2.48 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. LooHtiOn Sll.e(t.UOO Dote TOlal ~ # Trill Lon~O'{h TrlpG'1I l1m.Po<lod nip Pcr.ont Nc" 'hips VMT Sour.., '0 Int.n-ie"" InI.n'I""" Rat. u,n~~h """~,,,,(',, " 14.1 ]'",-~' " " ''',-8~ lUl' .'J~ 41 '''-d~'''(''''''~' (,~'m'..1t1 ".UA ~,.(1 1.""_')2 4'" <.4" 'L"''''''''''''' (i"'"octI(','GA 1,011 IJt"'~: .1.6(1 '," S'm,Sm"'" 1',"<lI"{',,.1-1 1,'.11 (~1-~~ .', '" I' 4~ ..-j /,.111 ~O.O 1<"'';4 111.,..1,-'",,''''' A,~"""", St.I'"..~'tn"".1l 2(,'.' " >-,~ :'1 "4 ',0-; ", ~H. 1""",h,')I",,,,~. A,,,.;u"<>s I<."IS= '.12.1 ^' [,ri lenll" ,~ W' b<<dA. ,Tn ,. .k, 5.15 General Office Building (ITE LUC 710) V.,,~lllo>J) ~",,' N,,, Inl' M''''''~o <,2-3 W""iltedAv.,-.gcTripG,"""i:,,,k<"", W_R4 ITEAv""'le In~(;"'""\.'" Rn.. 11.01 ^"c"""YMT' .117.12 We'0>'edA"",.~,VMl' 01.56 Exnlanation: For LUC 710, TGR was determined using the trip mte equation found in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook. FL Studies data was used to calculate the trip length and percent new trips only. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-S Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No, 10A February 10, 2009 Page 142 of 191 l.(Ieot;on Sizdl.01HI I)"t~ 1"<>tal# # -rrll) Lcn~<th Trll'Gcn Tim. Trip p.,'c.mN... VMT Sou"," .0 Into,.,,"'''' lnl......i.... Rat. P.riO<! """ Trip. 1,"\ ,,_n "1..-"" " !/, (,,"' "~" K.\Jllh_lh'n'/i.: A",,,,i"", 1'.1", U'"""fl IU (k,_~~ '''4 " " ~, ~,,-< I,'" .,,, I,V,c' lmu.I"_'\II\'<t&^,,"u,,<, S1 !'""""h",,,,rl "", -,~ " '" " !II ~".4 , 1<1 "" l,mJ.k,Olov.,-&^,,,,,,,,,, 11c'l1l,"d,,(, " ".. M"v.'I(, ,~, ". !~.< , .". I," "I.' 1(,_'1>" I L""d<~)I",e;& """"'"'' II,,,,,,",I,,C,, n ,<(, .~t"v_'H 20, '" "j 7~ ',"-0 ,,<t!. 'I." ",f,' l",J.lc.()hvcl I. ^'~"""<' Ch"rl..nd'",1'1 11.11 "".~7 "" ~'!.'O ",,'-' 4f,n 'Ie , 1(".0" Imd"ie_Ohv,,"" ~'''~',,'', CI..rl""<,',, 1'1 !,,, ""'~' ,,,, " '"' ,,--'" 'hi xU ," '" ]m,t.ld)I"'cr&^'~",",,, (1"",'0'(" FI '''.4 ..".'J' ,~. "~I ~" 'm.., "11 ~, --' If)~ "' ,,,,,t,,I..()hH~& A",~,,,., (',,,,,,C,, H ".~ ",,_m '" l~ . (,"J '/).1 ~ I \ fi' I",",'"(",v<<&^""",,,, , ",,",(\, " WI' "",,_m ", ~, ,,~ >-(,'1' t..,,, ":4 ",,, Im(1JlI,.Oh,',,/l.: A,,,,,,,,,, (',mllC, H " 1"','-") " ~n^ " 'J.': IM'.l" [md"",.()I,,'~ o.^"""",'<, I",,,IS,,~ ~,45 , '" .~ ., ~~, In 1.:0Jj -. h...."..,. " ,- "' 'M Medical~Dental Office Building (ITE lUC 720) Ill""d"d,,,,ol (,,0 Vie'1h"""""'"'N""ln"^"",,,,< ~~.~ A""",hp(;"""~"""""",, ITrAvmll<lnp(",""",,,,,,k.lI'. 1l"",~"If'LM"d..,."dlTE^"",..,Tr;pG.".'.t"'"lh": ^v".~" \-'~T W"'!h<<dAvrno,,\-'MT );_19 '6.1.' J;,~ 17,..\[ 1'7.29 Exnlanation: For the LUC 720 trip generation rate, a total often (10) sites (shown above) were blended with data from ten (l0) sites in the rTE 7th Edition Handbook to increase thc sample size of data. The resulting TGR of35.95 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate, Business Park liTE LUe 7701 Location Siu(1.000 .'" Total ~ # TrlpL<IIlllh Tr;pL;ell Tim. Trip P.r,,'m~e" V!\-IT Source ,0 ln1~",,'i..., Int......;."'. R"t~ ".'riod l,~n::lh Trips C"Il,",(",H '" "I","" " " >""" '''', 7'.' "-',2 Im,",;,-,')]"""" A,,,~',,,,,, ("lIw,(".Fl M,lt "I".'>" " II q ,,-" '11' "'i" -'1."2 lmcl<,~'.()IL\'c~& A"""m'.' ',-,II,erC".1'1 ,11.1 M,v.'h '", 1"'11 ,",_Ii q" 'J.l.0 "'1'14 1",,~,,'~)ln'c~/;. A,,,~,m", l"UlISIZO 2'il.2 4."'".... ... .Tn 1...1\, 4,'0 n, ~ ~j.ln./. '" bIrolA..,. '" ... " .~ Hknrk,I",w _'~(,,2 W"!""-.) I on;cm Nc'l' I"I'^"'"'' 3'.1 1'1",1"," A"TlII!c'lnl'(;""'''''''''' k!lt< In^''''~']nl'''''''(~''L'''"Rolo HI,"~ "rH, "ndk>."o 1 1'1: A,'"..,T';p{...",.h,," R.lo: ^'"",..",cnn W"lh,od ^,'c,""VMT 1'.!2 1'.16 lUll 7(,__10 c,H4 Exnlanation: For the LUC 770 trip generation rate, a total of three (3) sites (shown <lbovc) were blended with data from fiftccn (15) sites in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data, The resulting TGR of 12,98 was uscd in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. Specialty Retail Center (ITE lUC 814) 'local N ~ 1 'It' L."~ll, lnlon'i~w. t"loni.w, TFII' POFco"IN... Lc""lh T'ip. \"~IT Sou<c. "l.iKI I' "" '4.(" .,,, Ie' I" ",(, :." ,4' 1411.7/, M. .hl I... tb: 2,~7 W.. h....Ao.... T. t.,. b: 1.97 ""'~"'"11',,,."1ll N,... '''pM''''"< '~.7 W",.'''\<,'.I\,."..,"1ri"(;"""""",, ",,,e Ill-. ~""~~, 'Inll(""''''''''''' ...." Ill<.d "fFI,M"d;c, .n" 'Tl..,,,,,..~,-r.;p(;....,.t;." R.t<: Am,,,VMT W"'1h'CO^""1,VM1 l',nd"Ic'(>I1v"&A",,,,"" 1,,,JaI'.'jl,,.,,/l.:A''''''''t,,, In llic""kcl'''Lol "H;) 'U.J, 4Q,9' 1".71 11<.2{, Exnlanation: Forthe LUC 814 trip generation rate, a total of two (2) sites (shown above) were blended with data from four (4) sites in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of49.99 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-6 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 143 of 191 l.o<aUon SI1.c(l,OOO Date Total # /lTripu"I....b TripGcn TIm.rorind Trl" Pcr<:cntS",,'Trip' VMT SuulU " IIll0rv;"",. Int.nll...... It"t. un~"h IlIfIlI",Fl MIir.~& ~" ,. (,'..1' fi.Lmlc....II""'&A'~":..'c~ '" n Mltf-~' 17" 1.71> '-llll~"'.lI"m&A'~~.ID'''' " I,FL l.t,'r_~~ ',. '. 71>.1' Kimb-lI"m&A,,",H;""<~ 1""'I>iI_IT MJiH" ,. "-'" I;.,,,,I..._II,,,,,&A...,,.,,,, SL.I'el<e<b"",.n 1.1'1',11 '" -~~ '"' ,'II< 11.1')' \(", ),_1> IJlldJII,_fll""'f&A'~~IIIt<" SL f'ct""," FI Ill.' Se,"~~ '" '" 7..iXL 1f~-7 , ", 'i1." "7.51 1,,,,",Ic-L)l~',,,"&A,~,,,,",,, IJIflW,fj ~2j.11 '" " IW IlU !".J) IL". eW ;.'..l> 4(,,11 11"duk_()l~'e,.&A,,">c""" 1."..od'".FI ~IL' V. CJ~ ~II' " " 'J, , " 7M' ;r"m l",..].,.OI~'",&A."",..",. l'i..oll., P.,.1c fL "'i(,,O , Sc~9 "S )~~ ~I>-' '."1 '''.(1 1,,"",">-()liv"&A'~~"'" ","".,,10,1'1 4~j.1t (x,-~~ (,14 -'~(, >17." 'l,o"..I.,.()h,-er&A,,,,,,,OI"'''' Ilillt;bo:~""."('".11 ]t4.\> )"I-~I , '" 74.f! l,ndIIlo-(l1N",&^"~,<~to:; '1i1l....m""'h('".1l l.'lf! ),,1-')1 1.'11 no ',oo.'o-()'",,,,&A,~,,-~,,,, (\'I],er(\',I" Au,-~I " " ", '/,11 Ol.<ll 1",..].,.Ol"..r&A'~"""es O'"I"er('''.11 "'w-~I 1'IH 1_'4 ,"" "4-'1 IH~J J",~,]o-Oh..,& A"""..1c< ,""'~'"IVH"Oc"'",,.I'l ]m.u ,.,)-~: .,,-] I~~ -+~;:- ~',6 "-"""Mmoc1'Ul,,,-,,,,,,,,",,,_1nc (""",_I'L 1').4 , " -"~I ", '''.11 );J" L".nl('crl"~^'~~'",'e,.I"" (;W"",""('",(;A '~J.] IJoo:-~: 4(,I~) '0,0 ]"'-<>1 ,"""Sou,,", (;~'m"",'(".(;A 'IV IJ",,_,!! C71~1 ;4.11 1'-':.)' """"Sm,"" ,,.-"~""( ". H 11",0 )un-~l " " ]1:.14 ,I' """""",C"",,,, SIIf."",(",A 14('.1 Jun-~' '.' " :'15' '"" """"~.. ('<,"my S""'~""('". H. 15',' J",,8J " " 7".7~ '," SItm'''18C''UllW S","~,,,(',,.I-l Inll JUD-~) (,~ r,2 (,(,7" "X, ",,,,,,,,,,(',,,""y ",;n,,",,'('" n 1I11.~ "",,-'I(, ,. ')1 'J;,.6~ Hoi< .q~ ]',n~ ImdIlk4'],ver& ^'~'C""'" ('1,,,,,,,.,(',,,fL "',II Oc,_~7 ~,-;p un "-] '_I_\h Im...Ie~)hvor.j, ^,~"i"", ('10..-1<"",('".1'1 I~I.~ 0",_9' 7'.11ll ~".5 ,40 <...~ K7.n I..,:!llk~'h,'or.j, ^'~"""to:; ('",,,].,,,,,(,,.1-'1 '<1..' 000,-91 ,'m ",,-~ , .')1> ~ J.~ "doH 1""!..."{)Ii",,,.j, ^,~'C""<< ]111<<('",1-1 (".H Af'411 2'" m j":J,(' '4(' 71.2 ,'>07 j",d<,I,~()I~'<~& A'~",,'''' 1".d',,_FI 1" ^I"~I] '" \7(, (,<)11 4~1 -"J,n "-'..17 l",""].,.()I~,,,,.,,,A<~>c""" 1',,,-,,(',, n {,H ^1"~I~ ... 14_'''' "h-~ , ", "'.~ '~)M Im..k-()I"'o;I<A'~","'", I'."",('".I-'l '5H ^",-{I2 '" \,." ')"-~ "" "'." ,'..0 [""",I,_()h,'",,,,^,,,,~""es ("ndH.I'I_ I ,~.H , J",~n "4 ~"'''' "."" ~ '" ".1 IlH.II_' 1"""k-.llh,'Cf&^'~""",'" ('''m,C".1-'I 'JI' N,."~" WI' ~,' 'in M- , CO' '<.11 7U7 r"'",'I<~()'~'",1< A,~"",,,, )~"~""'" "' "".' I""'~)(' "0 .'-'~ 41,"" " "I.1i ""ll' Tind<,kc(>ln~~I<A,~",..,,, )""~"'IIll,M'1 ,''''', ,,,,'~'" ,,,,0 ,IJ~ ",4~ 1"<', ~'.(l .rr.~', 1'p>...""Iij",~1< ^,,'''..'''' 1i"'~"""LMT -'~.~ Ih~'(, .'~~ ,~~ "",0 '-'" )",0 "I." 1'.,,,,!c--OI;,-eI&A,,,,,,,,,'<< J.'toISizc .',1;7..\ ,- 'I"'; ,~ .' ,~ )'.2 W b..dA 'Tn J,I", Shopping Center (ITE LUC 820) ]6~J W"~h,,,dj ,n,,,' N", InpA",,~< 1".611 W"""I.d^"",~TnpGc"""''':J"Il<o''' W46 n'!', ^"""11' lnv Gcncm..", ""te: ~),94 N",., Go"'ll." "ud~ ~'itil tnv 1""-I!1h of~ ~ i. "" ,n,t];",. ",d h,-, 1>"",.",luded [mm we,~ht<d ''''''''~< mp I,,,~U, ""hlhlion Av,..~< VMT; Y'.47 W<'~"odA""",~,VMT 11:'j10 Exnlanation: For LUC 820, TGR was detennined using the trip rate equation found in the ITE th Edition Handbook. Trip length and percent new trips are based on a Florida Curve analysis using the studies listed above. New Car Sales (ITE LUC 841) I I Si~. (1,000 I ...... I T'.,I_ # Trip Lcnb<th I Trip Gen TIme I Trip PCfccn,1 New I "MT I I Lo...lion I <f) I U Inlerv,ews Imen';""" I RDle I'ffiod L.n~1b Tr,ps Soure<' ".I'e,,,,,I''''.1-1, ,n ",,_R~ L'~ I1n '!,,_~" 7" 7~.1' 1,",,,lo-OlovCT leA""",,,". no'",,",'c'- Fl .) o,,_R~ 1J6 I"'; c'I 4<> ",,_~ 4-"1 7R.I' I~J.1~ liml'lc'Ohv<,& A",,,,,,,.. h,,,] Suo 43 A.. hi Lo. tbl 4.611 JTE .174 W.i..hkdA... .1'rl I... h, 4"" Blended ,,,,.1 4]1 "'eL~h'"d I'oreorn No'" InI'A\'c~'!c JS..\ We"II"'d^"erll!"Tripl"",,,,";on KIlle N40 ITFA\'O"!clrip(;OIlcT1lt",,,i41'o JJ_J4 IIIcud 01 Fl,Sl"die. "od rrrA""'"l<TripG<"<notlu" llot., 32.9J ^"cl1lgeVM'1 10.1,19 N,n" The,""e numhero! oJ"''' lilrtile OIlrdoaic"";p w,,,,,,,,,,,d (",.tilo I),p>mm (1Ie",,,,lc' hlClIt;Oll..1be C;"',., I-'"n) ",dl;\y Welgb',," ^vem~' VMT II,,~I Exnlanation: For the LUC 841 trip generation rate, a total of one (1) site (shown above) was blended with data from eleven (11) sites in the ITE 7th Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of32.93 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. Locat;..n I S;'.e(l,ilOllj Dat~ I 'l'..tal# I ,f) 1 Interviews I'.,," U"bcll _ fL (,~.u .~",-!" 1 G) l""ISi>:< 62_0 HE l>M 1l1<"",d,,,,..1 "!_O Supermarket (ITE LUC 850) _Tril'i.enJ:lh I TrlpGen Tim. I Trip lnlervi..... I Rote Pe.-iod IUnJ:th (,2 i"".l~ ~"_4 ".'" ~..... I''; I..... III, Mti W,,"h"'dA... .'1'.1 I"" h, I,OK "''''gtl".~ P""co' New I'Ll' ^"c~.!e .<(,_n W,,~b'eol^'om~cTripG'''Cl1l''''" l(:[to Il'lA',,,.!cTnpG,,,,cn",,,,,R,,O, ll""'dofl'1.SI"dic.."dJTf.A......~,.hipG....~ti.."Ib.., ,"'..,~" VMT We'1I1t'd^,'''t<VMT PorconlNe.. I VMT I '1 tip. _"'.11 l~nJ S..nrce I I'mdlllc-ollvor&A,,,,,,,,,Cli 106.26 IIC.24 InJ.Jll 12).77 ] ~IIA2 ExnlanatlOn For the LUC R50 trip generation rate, a total of one (1) site (sho,\\rn above) was blended with data from four (4) sites in the ITE ih Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 1 03.38 was used in calculating the transportation impact fec ratc. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-7 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA , February 10, 2009 Page 144 of 191 Lo<>llioq Sizc(I,OOO DalO T'nla;. # Trip Lcn~lb "IrII'G.n Tim. Trip P<rr<nrN... VMT Sour.e .0 Int...I..... Inton';...., Rat. rorind L"njrtb Trip, I.m".FL M"."" '" 1.11' I;.Iml...II""'&'>""''''1<' ,,, ,,}'I " 'ii, ."_<.'~" J1I '" (.:q,,, 11<1 ,,,,,, ,,,IHl 1",,~,h'-()IIV.t &. ^,~""".. 0...,,,,,,,,,,.1'1 " A",-~ '" "''''.''' 1.f,1 ".11 ,'"'' ',"dIIl..OI"',,,-/<: ^'''~",,", ('"","'''<1".FI 1.1 N",.."J '" ~il {,'.',J.> 141" '"' "" '"'' 11n""le.()hv",IJ:.^...,~,""", M""'TIC".IL " J""_~I " " 'n21' "lIT'< I J ~ 4(, ~ ',<,<Il Tmo.k-()]",,,I<^,,,,,,,,,,... M.n"n('".1'! " )UD_9] " " '14m .,"" " 7~ ]'Jl 144.W 1,"dol"Oli,'c'&^",~",<, C"II",C",ft A,,,-~l '" " " ~. 7 Im,",K.-niln~1< ^"(~"'.. C"II""C,>.f'1 ^u,_~1 141' '0 I.", ,_'.J I LJl<L\le_()I,vcr It A"""""" ('~'m""'tC" (;A :.9 [).",-",,, ole, "" "",""m,o, (;~"""""('''.GA '1 L"I_'_I'"'' \7.11 .'''''',''Sm.n, 1,",1,,,-< I," ^ '" ,- '" T"wl.""W,,!bted 1'.1 . ~'ed "...... ", ,- ., ." Convenience Market - 24hrs. (ITE LUC 851) rrr, Illt:llOOOlO.... 10.0 :,.1 \I-<L1hlcdl''',,'''' ~<I\ Inp^,"""'l'< 'i.l W"lh'<d""OT.~'lnp(;=TI'''''" 1<s1. 090D IlL ^v.,,~, lITp(;""",,'"'' Ro'e 717 '1'1 Ille>>d "ffl,Mudio...." ITl:A,,,.,.T'ipG".<ro'...R.u-: 71Y.11 ^v""!l<VMT J.<IO( WC"ih"-dAvrnl1<VMT '.'1.>6 EXDlanation: For the LUC 851 trip generation rate, a total of five (5) siies (shown above) \vere blended with data from eight (8) sites in the lTE 7m Edition Handhook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of7l9.l8 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. \.QeoUon SI:",(l.(1Il0 nOle TOIOI# # Telp l."n~lb Tril,Gon Time Trip p.r<<nlNO"'1 VMT Sour<~ .0 Imo'"";.... Inton'i~... (lal~ P"d'Ml L'"~lh Trip. .-"m H Mm_", "" ~m,le,.lh'm^, ^"""J""" 1'01,,,,,,,,(',, n , , ']lTI-91 " ~" '4-1.1' :.Ihr "'0 ~r; Il I:','" 1,,,,bk,OI,,'<,,,,I,,",,"e, M",,,,,,(,, H , , )m,."1 (,f, ). ')')"'" ,." , (,7 ",. , '-"(,4: [,"",,,,.IlI,,'" """""",", .."""..C" FI " l,m."1 " '<,,", -I"" 'If, :'14 1'1 ", 1,,,,],,le_'lIn'o,^,^w,,,,,'<' (',,111"'(".1'1 ~",.~I " " '" ",(, ]""",J<.'ll"'",, I< A",~,",", (..,1100,(" Fl ^,,'."I " " , "', 'I" '"J"Io."I,,,,",, ",,,,.,,,,, I.m ..1'1 IWI.'.I'O'? "') " :~b, IHI, '1.1 Im,~,k-"Il\'''' It A""',,,<, 1-'11<"'''''.1'1 " III.',,,.,,/'j~ "4 " ''I" "'I(, ',<1 1""I"lc'-('i,,,,~^, ^"".,,,", 1.",,,.1'1 '.' 11.'1<>1:'" 1.1) :", " II,' 1",..le,";,,,,,'1< ",,,,.,,,,,, i",,,;Su. I)'; " A,'.r. '" ,- ,b, 1.4~ IlE OM lliJ.! " bl..t"''''' "J'<i "'" 1_~' ^ ., ,- 'bl(:elli..-, l.l.\ Service Station w/Convenience Market (ITE LUC 853) m..",," ',,'.u " " "",h"LII".<"II<,,"lnp^,""ll< .,__1 11.,- "'<'''IC' rnl'(;'""~"''''" ~''''I'''T''"olp'''.1 ,-I).6D Explanation: For LUC 853, a total often (10) sites from the ITE th Edition Handbook \vere used to calculate the trip generation rate_ This data "vas not blended \\'ith thc FL Studies due to the fact that the FL Studies sites were measured per "1 ,000 st~" while Collier County charges the impact fee per "fuel position." Lncation Si'.o(I.II')(1 Volo fo,"l# ~ 'l'ril' Lon~th TrlpG.n Tim. lrip P.n.nl r<;ow V.~IT Sonr"" .0 lolen-i.w, Inlon'iow, Ibt. ('<<;ot! I.o'~~lh Trip, I',,,.,,,.,, n " , "".<1, I" " "'J" :0' -'II.:' 11J""II....'I"ul<.-\,,,~''''''' 1'"",,,(', " I," ^ ,-ii, ,I:' " I::' ", :".J '-..' In.'.'" l;",lll<'."]"" ~ ","x,,,<, 1'"",,,(,, 1'1 1.'.1 , '-11:' 11 'J~ " 'J"". , " " , -".m Tm..I.-_'>lI""'" ^,,'~"'<, " ,1:;,,-< '0.1 ^' dri ,- ., 2.n7 ITE III>U \1'.1 -........ " ,- .. 'M Pharmacy/Drugstore with and without Drive-Through Window (ITE LUC 880 & 881) RkndeJ'otol 14(,2 'W<l~""d I'",,,,,", ~'''' I~I' """!' )'.' ^,'=~"l~I'C"'''''It1'''' ~"" ITI,M""g, I~~',o<,,~,,'"'" ~"o m"nd"'fl."ud;"'.ndlnA'"..~<T"il'(;"h"'",;"hll",., A"c1'!C'VMT' W""h'e<J"""",eVMT I(I\'!) ~,.16 nfllj 715J ',e'l EXDlanatlOl1 For the LUC 880/881 trip generation rate, a total of three (3) sites (shown above) were blended with data from nine (9) sites in the ITE 7d1 Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of92.88 was used in calculating the transJXlrtation impact fee rate. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-8 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 145 of 191 Location Si.o(I.lf()O D_'e TolaU # Trip L.n~lh Trll'Gcn Tim~ Trip Pcrr.,nINe..' "MT Sonrce '0 Im.r.;...! Inl.nt..... Rate Period Lcnlrth Trips I"""'.I'L 1,<.11 '..".31Im M " U.' '1__1 1",J".,.tll,vcrl< ^",~'""" I.." ". ~1 I(,.~ hd-'iJ ,. W 7.1~ j,.7 IlD",I.."I"'t~'" ^",,,',,,., ]~'rn ",,,1,,.,,,1< H .'i.! )"".0(, " I ~ll '.111 'J,_I> O~ W' 1(,.21 N,,",.,(;""" C"II"d",,",v ,",,,,".Ft ''''',Il lu".Ii(, I ~~ 154 (',.'(1 'J,." )14 N~ 1"41 N,,,,no.(,",,\ , ,n."(',,,u", A,~,,!l.ll"LJ, I-l ]<).1 ."m-(I~ '" Wi 1].11" ~"-" 4.16 74..< 47."" N"",,"~(,n'" _C"lIi"reo,""" T",,,IS... ll'~,.\ '''VOl" ,," ,- ~.,! 17J." W b..dA. ,1. ,- ., ~.e5 Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890) - Including Collier County Studies '" !l1""<!odlOlaI m 1,1]1~ Wc"~I""dl,.,,,,",N,,,, InpAvorug" 77.8 ^,,,r,,oTllp(i.""""K>oR.ol' nT^v""cj"I'(;<llm',,'uR"t< Rlend.f 1'1. Stud"" ODd In: A',"'~" Trlp(;.,,".<i"" I',,'," Avc,"~,VMI W,,~lrtod AVC1~~(' YMI (,.n6 ~ 116 '"' !1<.I~ 1(,.4~ ExnlanatlOn: For the LUC 890 trip generation rate, a total of three (3) sites (shown above) were blended with data from thirteen (13) sites in the ITE 7tll Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 5.23 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. LOC3tion Siz.(1.lJIIO Ual. Total# # Trip L.n~lb TripGcn TIme Trip P~r.ont N", VMT So.."", ,0 IRI."'i.... Inlor,'I~w. Ral' P<rlod Len~lb T.ip. r,,," FI. MRr."" " ,4" ~lmkv-[j"m"'A,~"u,,'" ,,~ FI M",_~(, 111 .'..Il Kimlc',..I'!<'m&A",',,"'e, 1'h,m-w"".H '" AL".~' 11.1 " ',,,. 5.!n 4",(1 Imd.llk'(II",,,,&^,,,,,,i,,,,, " .F[ ;;Il " ~~~ I)') "' I.m "'!> lu"",j,'.O]I\'e:r&A"'",,,'e, '''''''''']'.11 " O<1.~" Im""lc.()h""I<:^,,,,,,"uO' ".~",,( " " " ,,,,,-.1 ," " ',", [,11 <C.!> 1""I"k~n,"L"& A""",,,", ""M"("'.H " '''0_')1 " "he 1.1.' (,~.I 'i"""I,'~)ln"'& Am",,"., ".n""(".FI ), I"I.~I " "" ~'h" 2.7" '<.I, Imd,k.l1lwc,'&A,,,,,,",o, ('<,il",('" 1'1 ^",,-~1 I~" '" ,411r (>,," "i.) 1",",,""-()h"c~1<: A",,,,,,,., (\,n'''('''.1-1 "",,~I 11(. " U~ ~(,.~ ILnJ,'c.OIl\'c"&A",,,,;"o. ('"lh,d'''.11 """"" ] ~l " "" ~B ImJ,""_Oln'c,'I<:A",,,"'"'' IlC'I'1l,,,d,,('.,,Fj '.4 Ml>Y'% 'M " ';H; ,J) !~,7 ILlldlllc."]"'crI<:A"",,,,,O' M,n"n('''.n ), , _IJ' ", !41n- 1.,< '~.f, K,ml,..,.II"m&A",,,",,o, M"n..nl'",1-'I " Ml''''O, '" ?.j('.M ?~b, ,',f, 4(]..' ",-'.44 KLmlc'v.ll"mI<:A,,,,,''''c< 1"",IS,ze ,5.l J.7 A".... l'rl>L<oo .' 2.l~ = ,U> ill> W, bk>JAv. ,,' ,- ,,~ Drive-In Bank (ITE LUC 912) BI<ll"odtotlll ~6,2 ,.,,1 w"~"'"Jlc",n''''e~ l""A,c"'1" ~6.l W,;,b"d Avo"'~, 'I~p G,",,,,,;,,,, 1<,'11' ifE>", bin",,, ^"",,~, lropG,.",,,oti,,n Roto III<.dnf.1.S'"d;..,,,dlTEl',-rtOll.hlpC;,'.,rollo"R.te: :'4(,.&6 ]~~.IS 159.34 ExnlanatIon: Forthe LUC 912 trip generation rate, a total of one (1) site (shown above) was blended with data from seven (7) sites in the ITE 81h Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of 159.34 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. UlcarioD Size (1,000 Dwlc Total # #T.il'L/!n~tb TripGon Time Trip PerccnINe..' VMT SOli."" .0 Int.rvlew. Inl~rvlew5 Ra'. Pnlod l..n~lb Trip. ].mo,l-'1. ~~u.'''' " " 'I<> ~!-" K,",b.IIIlm&A"",j,,,,, S,P"""hu,,'.F1 75 0,,_"" m I" 11;", 14.' '--'" ".11 I ",,1liIc"'lliv<,'1< ^,~''',,'"' C"''''''",''.FL ~,II 0",."', " ." I'''',) ;<>,,-2 ',Xf, 1,7.(> Jo1-'4 1 ",""k_Oh,.." 1<'\""''''0' Im;,IS;.. I.\,~ '" M" ,,' L<oolb, ,~ In, ~ l).';j), W,; "dA"",,"oTT , " J.U Quality Restaurant (ITE LUC 931) Blendod'otLll 1.'IJ,5 14)11 \I-<,~""lll L~'<"' N.... Inl' ",""." J6.7 ITEA""'<i~clripGL""""t~ml4"(j'>I:,""'1l H6 Exnlanation: For LUC 931, a total of eleven (11) sites from the ITE ih Edition Handbook were used to calculate the trip generation rate. 111is data was not blended with the F10lida Studies because the Florida Studies use "1,000 sf" as the measurement unit, while Collier County charges the impact fee per "seat." Location Sbo(l.mm l'lal. ToM# ~ Trll' Longlb Tril,Gcn rime Trip Perrom 'ow VMT Sonro. ,0 Into,,'iow5 Inlorvlow. Rat~ Poriod Lon~lb T.il" Ik'""l\d,'(''''1-'! (,2 M",',"', ;41 I'" I'''jl ~,,-~ ~ 7(, ;,--, '''.II!> 1'''"<ij,..()j",,,I'-A,,,,,,''e, H,'m<ind"(',,.FI ~ 1 ~tI>v.% 1<4 " In:." ,,-f. .1.1, ',II.' :."'~' [",.,I"()l"."ItA",,,,,,", St.!'''''''])''''.!'1 <.n ()".~~ " ,.. 1".~1l 11'<1.) !,r,r, 'nil !.,-", lm...I,'('h"",~' '\""""'0' Kc""""h('''''.n ",,-"" T'f, I'.;^ 1]7 ~~ "'"7)1> ,--'" o~,!> :111-'~ rmdJl",~)I"'c,,1<: A",,",",c. 1'''.:''('''.11 '.1 A)f.OJ '" " ~~ .~7 ",-I, 7' "J.' 21{,$1 i",<b,],'('hv",&A""om'", 1""'''(''.1'1 " , -OJ II~' I,! 1"'-'1 ",,-f. k-'19 ",.(, '.,1.11 l'",<i<,k.Obvor" A"",,",., 1'."""(',, " <.~ , ,..01 I~l 1(1) 11'..~7 ',,,-~ .'.4~ <'d' :".71 1'",...!e-('h"",,,A,,,,,,",,O' lo"'I,,,~ .\S.6 ;"',, .1'r; I..".'b: "" 11'10 "'-' Wol_hk<l'\"'". '" ,.. 'b: J.n High~Turnover Restaurant (ITE LUC 932) BI",d<<(",,1Il I'J.6 N,"",,,=lldl'.,,,,,stucly,^cluded r~'m""Hru,",,"'"'''''' "'<'~"'od Po"".' N"" I np ^,,""~o 70.8 lJ'lA"C"iofnI'Gom,n,,;onRH,o(l><";oa'j 4.~3 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-9 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 146 of 191 EXDlanation; For LUC 932, a total of two (2) sites from the ITE th Edition Handbook were used to calculate the trip generation rate. This data was not blended with the Florida Studies because the Florida Studies use "1,000 sf' as the measurement unit, \vhile Collier County charges the impact fee per "seat." u..<alioD Si..(l.(IINI Dalf l'oralN . Trip L<'n~lb TripGen Time hip P<rte",N... nIT Source .0 Intccvirw. Intorv;ew' Rate Poriod L'n~lh Trip. I,,,.. FI M;"."" " ,'" l.;,mh-llno,&'A",.,-"""" ].'" " M,,,.",, "", " "-mdo',_lInm& ^""",,,t<:. I',"cll"(',,,n :,H .^,,,_>t'; " " 'J"'" 1<" , '" "1.(' '''.1.'1 hodllle'''h"....1> ^,~c"1<' l'm.II"(',,,rr 4.'/1 (),'I.'~ ,,^ !r,(j "'".''' , ,,. -,,, _<7.r1 ,r.,.', 1",d.I'-()]"'<r"-^,"~..,., 1;, ""'onDhFl (~"-"" '" ,,' ",-' .1."r; 4')(1 Imdlll,.OI'v","'^",,,,,,.,., M.,,,,"C,, " , '" J""."I '" 'C..I" "'h" "01 " , 4(,(,". 1,",",I....OI".cr/< ^,~"i"., M.~"n('" n .,~, )"0-"1 ',., ". (,c,'''' -I'be< I.'. I,i..\ ,'HUll l,ndoINlll\,<t&A"""".. ('"lIt<d'" "I ,\,,".~I '" " , ," 'A' 1,,,.,k'OI,,',,-,, ^"'",,,.,'" ('"il",,' n ",,"-~] 'I> ." , ,- ''-~ 1,00.1,-01"...-", ".""em'.. 11,"~",,<i,,( " fI .'4' M,,,.W, 1'1, ,! 'II "' '1".1, , "' "I,: 'I.'." 1",,],,k.{)I,,',,-,,^,,,~,,,., lIom.",j"C" H '.1.' "'".W, II,' " ,'"'. ,~ 'J"" , 'v "-Y ':.'11' l,"dllkOl"''''I<A,,,~,,IO' I~."( " H :,,, , ".111 -,7(, ~I, '"4''' :<. 0,-," 11~! J7 I'mJ...-"h,'cr&""""",., I".,{\, " 'en ",,-.ill <' ',"'W ,,, " , I :,1~' Imdlll<"II",,~/< ^,"~,"'" 1".cC, H "if " ,_01 I" 1'7 '."1[> 'I' ,r. .,:(,\, I"L<lioI,'.OI",,, I< A,,,~,.,,,,, """,,,(',, " 2M, .",.'" ,,,', " ~":' " "'-', ,,, ~',.II "'>4.'" !'tn,.,Ie_Oil,'",/< ",~,,,.,., I'."""", " '''' , 'om ,,/. ," <J") '..'~ ,., '" ~"!": rmd.I(_nllV"'''- ",~"""c, 1","-'"(,, H H~ All_11C 1(,' '!I' "."'.,4 ',".~ ". " , , Ifl~~ '" r......I(-()I"'l"f&A.,,~'"'c, I,""IS". w.~ ,- co . '" ITh ~.Jl ". btodAo. , ~ , ',M Fast Food Restaurant wlDrive Thru (ITE LUC 934) "I""ded,,,toI In..y ....,,"'''''!P'~<mN.. j"pA"",. ,,9 We"Io,,," A"O['1-,T~]lU",",,,,,," Kal. IlFAv"""lnp(><II<Tllt,,'oKa,. Ill,ud.,n,s..d'",.ud ITF,\,.,.., T.;p (;.n....';"u Ra... ^'c..~,VMT WCI,lotodA,"",.<VMT l64.46 4%12 ~ll.n '(,,\,14 (,,11.02 n""TL"clu,;oo'j '40 ~"". ..."', r,,,,u,"Jd, "00' ,,,,,ludcd,,,U,cTI.,,,,i,,,",,;,," EXDlanation: For the LUC 934 trip generation rate, a total oftv.iclve (12) sites (shown above) were blended with data from twenty-one (21 ) sites in the lTE ih Edition Handbook to increase the sample size of data. The resulting TGR of522.62 was used in calculating the transportation impact fee rate. I ISi",'OI.UlKlj Lucation I I Service Station (ITE LUC 944) 1.''''''.1-1 iI-" ""er,-"""".FI ,,",IS,... Il.6 D I TDI..I. ... lnle",,,,.., N,'\',~y 1[, A",.91 1(,' ~TriIlLO"l:lh I Trip Go" I Time I l',lp Inl~r\'l.'" R.l~ I r.rlDd I Lcnl:lh 14 iW ~I' I"l A ."]',1 !II, lA' W.i ~'"<l"'""" .Tc' I",. !II, I.~ ... .1'.,1",.1(:011101". I,Ul \\"~I>'",II """"" N,~ I "p A"",r Porre~IN... I VMT I Tc,p. I :'.11 :'.> Suurc~ I llIKl,It,OI,,'" I< A'~"',"le< T,uo.k.()I"",&A",,"",,o, ~)," ExulanatJOn For LUC 944 a total of six (6) sites from the ITE ih Edition Handbook were used to calculate the trip generation rate. This data \\-'as not blended with the Florida Studies because the Florida Studies use ") ,000 sf' as the measurement unit, while Collier County charges the impact fee per "fuel position." l.or'lion I Si<e 1 l.lIOO I I TM.IN .n I Dal. I..,.",i""" " No,_," ill N,,''''~ I'" Self Service Car Wash (ITE LUC 947) I 1"",,,.1'1 CI",,,,,'",'Or.l'I '',,,is,,,.. ~TriIlLon~<th I Tril,Go" I Ti~~ I Trip Inten',""" R.t. I Period I.o"l:lh ~4 'M'", ", "I' i~1 PorrenlN"" IVMT I So"re. TCII" "(,,11 li"d,le,'ll,"""^,,",,,,,", 'I.n Tmd,(,'-Olll'",&A,,,,,mt,, i ).1 A.... .1', I"",...: I.GS Ilc "'" ....< cT., I"'n h, ~.!1lI \\','IhtoJI ",,", ~,,, '''I' ^,","'O ,6.0 Exnlanation: For LUC 947, a total of onc (1) site from the lTE ih Edition Handbook v....as used to calculate the trip generation rate, since 110 trip generation data \vas available from the Florida Studies sites. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 A-IO Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 147 of 191 APPENDIX B Cost Component Calculation Agenda Item No, 10A February 10, 2009 Page 148 of 191 Appendix B Cost Component Calculation All information used to compute a typical cost per lane mile and a typical average daily capacity added per lane mile is presented in this appendix. As noted, county road data was collected from the Collier County Transportation Department as well as recent construction bids from other counties in Florida. In the case of the state projects data, the sources are construction bid data for state road projects in other Florida counties and FOOT gaming reports for recently completed or fully programmed capacity expansion projects in Collier County. Ril!ht-of-Wav Cost County The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along the corridor that was necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen or in the case of new construction to build the road. Based on the local data, a ROW cost of$1.3 million per lane mile was used for county roadway projects with urban design characteristics. Table B-1 provides a detailed description of the projects analyzed. State FOOT has not recently acquired ROW for any lane widcning projects in Collier County. Based on discussions with FOOT and Collier County, it has been determined that the ROW acquisition cost for state roads is equivalent to that of county roads. Therefore, a ROW acquisition cost of $ 1.3 million will be used to calculate the unit cost per lane mile of an urban desif,'lJ state road. Based on discussions with FOOT, it is anticipated that all of the lane miles that the State will build in Collier County in the future will have urban design characteristics. A review of the widening projects along SR 84 in the 5-ycar plan confim1ed that only urban design projects are being considered. Tindale-Olivcr & Associates, Inc. December 2008 B-1 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No, 10A February 10, 2009 Page 149 of 191 Construction Cost County As shown in Figure B-1, a review of construction cost data for Collier County shows two recently bid projects with w-ban section designs within the County. The weighted average construction cost for the projects along Santa Barbara Boulevard and Collier Boulevard is approximately $3.7 million per lane mile. In order to analyze a larger sample, a review of recent county projects in Florida was conducted for county roadways. This review captured twelve (12) roadways and determined a range of$1.7 million to $4.2 million per lane mile for projects with urban desi!,'ll characteristics. When the two sets of data are combined, the resulting weighted average cost per lane mile is $3.1 million. As shown in Figure B-1, the County construction cost of approximately $3.1 million reflects the recent trend of decreasing costs, and represents a conservative approach to the recommended cost. Table B-2 provides detail on all ofthe projects considered in the construction cost analysis for county roads. State As shown in Table B-5, a review of statewide construction cost data shows nine recently bid projects with urban section designs. The construction costs range from $2.3 million to $4.7 million per lane mile with a weighted average cost per lane mile of$3.2 million. As illustrated in Figure B-1, the State construction cost of approximately $3.2 million reflects the recent trend of decreasing costs, and represents a conservative approach to the recommended cost. It should be noted that two local projects in the 5-Year Program along SR 84 (from Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd and from Radio Rd to Collier Blvd) were identified, but ultimately not included in the analysis. The costs for these segments represent future estimates with a weighted average cost per lane mile of $4.9 million and are not reflective of the recent statewide cost trends. Other Cost Components County The unit cost per lane mile for county roads Collier County also includes updated utilities, mitigation, interchange and carrying costs associated "lith capacity expansion projects. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 B-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No, lOA February 10, 2009 Page 150 of 191 Utilities and mitigation cost estimates were developed based on four recently bid lane widening projects in Collier County. As shown in Table B-3, the utilities cost is approximately $455,000 per lane mile and as shown in Tahle B-4, the mitigation cost is approximately $99,000 per lane mile for county roads. Interchange cost estimates were developed based on two (2) planned interchange/grade separation projects in Collier County that are expected to be completed by 2030. These projects consist of improvements at the intersection of 1-75, CR 951 and Davis Boulevard and where the US 41 (Tamiami Trail) meets CR 951. The total interchange cost provided by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department is $283.36 million. This figure was then divided by the total lane miles being built in the 2030 LRTP Financially Feasible Constrained Plan (434.7 lane miles). As shown in Table B-7, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000. The lane mile cost includes an update to the carrying cost that tends to occur while a roadway is being built (approximately a 6-year process for County projects). As presented in Table B-8, the carrying cost per lane mile is estimated at $259,000 based on the time tahle provided by the county for cach phase. This figure takes into consideration the fact that the County receives some of the impact fees up front. State The unit cost per lane mile for state roads Collier County also includes updated mitigation, interchange, and carrying costs associated with capacity expansion projects. Since no data was available for mitigation costs of state roads, the mitigation cost for county roads was used (Table B-4). Also, the state road construction cost estimate does not include a utilities cost due to the fact that the Collier County Water-Sewer District pays for utility relocation costs associated with state facilities. As with county roads, the interchange cost per lane mile is approximately $652,000 for state roads (Table B-7). In addition, the lane mile cost includes carryiug cost that tends to occur while a roadway is being built (approximately a 6-year process for State projects). As presented in Table B-9, the carrying cost per lane mile is approximately $264,000 hased on the cost components associated with constructing a state roadway. This figure takes into consideration the fact that the County receives some of the impact fees which charge for travel on all roads up frout. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 B-3 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study <("'~ r- >. ^ 000'> 'g] -o~ O~ ,,- Co . 0 ' - . " -"~ ,- ~ = " ~"" ,0:0 E ~~ ~ ~ 200m ~ -;:00> u " "'~'" 0- g~ " 'D.Dn.. .e .E c'" ~~ Q)U- " 0 ,2 0'> -i'l ~ <( " cii 0 -g " 0- cii ?: ~ ~ ~ 3 " .e .. 0 0 .. - " ~ Co Co " 1l ~ ::j '" 15. il ~ ;l 0 ~ ~ ~ il il ~ <: ~ij E ~ ~ , , " " g~ . 0 0 . . a u Co ~ ~ + + + 0 0 .- Q'\ Q Q M "ii '-' '" fl:s ..... '" 0 U rJl = "'C c: 0 ell ... ..... ... ... ("I 'I- 2ii CO_ = 2'8 ell rJl :.. '" 0 ..... ,. ... '" '" ::IU = .~..... 0 LL. C U ell (J 0 ell It: = . = ~o 0 22 U " :.. ~ ... - - 0 U ~a 2~ ~ . 88 N~ u .5 " , " 'I] "'w ~8 .::::N _-.J]'H ;=0 g ~ 8 g g 8 g 0 0 0 ~ g ~ g ~ '" '" of of ;;; ::fI!W ~u1l1.J3d) 1~OJ uo!pn.lJ~uoJ :> o g ~ ;;; :3 " ~ :3 ~ :j, o o o g :j, <iQ)~ 00'" ~o~ .N_ o ,0 ZON ~cn >= :>,~ ~mQ) -:00> ro~'" v'oll. oW CJLL 0> <( - _Ul 008 .!!!s: ~o >-0:: >. E ::l o U ~ ~ (5 u " o ~ :; " 'iij u . . 0.. '" ~;:; u. ~ ~ 0-' =: o:c ~ - ~ r-- 0' r- v, r- 7' ('.1 i:;f~~ ~ -.:t. I'! r.~ IA""''''''''' . . ii =:! 'C . -" ~ ~,< ~ ~o OO~ ~~;~~ ~ ~ ~_....l..J ':=>QC:'" ... ~:-~~ o ~ 0_ ~~ ::> Q ~~wu VJ 1o"I1~. . ... E . ~ -< < " I~ . '" ~ 3: '" . ~ . _u .. 00., '" 00 oo~ ~o_- ff', .0 r-'~ V', cr,...--, 00 -...; - - <"', VI""''''''' ~ii ." . " -'< <'1...". '-1;"1" . ... ~ , ;; -::I.2:!"'='"':l ;,. ,:,;: as_ ;; . ~~]VJ 8~~~ e e ... " . . -l~ -;;; . . . --;;; ~ g ~ E .8 ~ -.:; ~ ~~ :::::C:3 -,- ~ ~ . . '" 0. 'C ~ . '" 2i g oJ ,-,::0 $ ;.> ~ ~ 22S.;3v g~~~;; ~:S~a~ ~ 1-- ~ .~ I. ~ t1 ~2 . . -~ 0" ,c :0 ~ ~ ~ u j c e , t o .. " e Co ~ M .....-, ;; "'~ ~ ~ N - - ~~ gf .~ 3 ~ ~ g ~ g " .2 ~ " " >= :: E f~ - 2 ~] t 0 & , :e '" E: ~'" ~'.~ ::; " ~] C" u u ;; o~ :/1", C :oz u .s . r~ i~ < ~~ .~ ~ o t: ~"8 -0 !'j I~ 0 <l:a>~ 000'> ~~ ,- o 00') ~U) E >>~ .sCUm -::>0> ro~ro -o'o(L cO) O)LL 0> <l: " '" 'tl .. '0 D: ... " ;= 'I:J " o C)l~ llJ~ .! 5 .c 0 "u ... .. 'I:J .~ .. - " - III 'I:J c " Cij CJ o ..J . ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;J; N . ~ ~, .. ~i' '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :J:: ~ ;j, "' 1l .....110> N '" ;:j "' .,( .,( 05 N 05 '" '" ~ ~ . ~~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ N " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lii ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ a ~Q '" N r;i N N N .,( '" N 0' ., N N Nf"l . 8' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ . Uu'- .,. {lic ~ ~ ~ :;: ~ N ~ N is ~ ~ ~ N - ~ ~ ~ N ~ 1'0. ~ c, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g; ~ N ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ = c-' N "' ~ N i" ;i .,( '" '" '" '" N -i '" ~ ~ :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ i2 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ :; r;i -i ~. '" "l '" '" " '" q q ~ ,,; "' N ~ ~ c ;;; ~ c ~ = ~ ~ c ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; ;;; N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; ~ 13./);: ~ ~ ~ c c ~ ~ c ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ;); ;;: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,,; ci ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ N :<i ,,; c -i N '" 6 N S ci ~ N -i '" ~ N ~ N . '" =,~. ..;j.", . 'II .. C" = '" N N N N N N N N N N N N c, ~ . N ~ ~ ,H . u [J .s.~ ~ :;: - lIJl\. N ~ ~ ~ ;;: ~ ~ :! ;J; ;; ~ I. =" -i ~ ~ N ~ ~ :i;S 6 N - ~ 6 - ", - - 6 - 1< ;;; .e " . " . . ;; . ;; . " . .". '" '" '" '" .e '" -e '" -e '" ~ '" -e ::> :; ::> :5 :; ::> :5 ::> ::> :5 :; ::> ~'. ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ';. .. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . ~ ~ C N N N ~ N N 0' N N N N '"" ';<f,Qj " :S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . '" CiS 5 ::Ii '" CiS '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" Q. '" '.' .,,' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ " c ~ ~ is ~ ~ ~ i:j ~ " " " ~ :5 ~ c ~ ";,. N N N N N N N N N ,. ... " 0 ~ '" , 0 z ~ -a ~ a . i2 . '" ~-i; " 'S " ] . ~ ." " ~ ~ o 0 01~ '" o 0 " - ;; . .- ~ - 0 'E ~ ~ 0 ~~ 0'" ; '" ~ ~~ ~ > 'c ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ . ,', :5 8 'S 0 '" '" .? ::::s .s, ::> ~ z .",'.... ~ > . " g ~ .', ; ;; ~ . ; - 5 '" ~ . " . w 0 > ~ ... Oil - ~ ~ Oil , co '" ~ .g ;'}i.. 0 ;l " l5 .. 0 . 0 - ~ :;; " '" ;;: ~ 'E e ~ ~ ~ .s ~ .g , 0 ;g 0 ~ '" ~ " " .. 0 ~ :E 0 w z :i3 '" w ~ "' '" " v; " .' f'f - " ~ . ." I ~ " 0 - ~ 0:: " . .. r ~I~ ~ 1= < 0 ~~ ~ '" > ~ .'.. : Oil ~ . ~ ~ 0 0 . ~ 0 '" . ~ ~ ~ ~ 'S > ~ . 0 ~ '" ,'Pe ~ Oil ~ 0 " . . ~ '0 0 '" .< '" . " ~ < " ,g :;; " E w " '" ~ c '"..) ;J; co ... . ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 0 . " ~ 0 ~ ~ . .; . 'S '" ~ ~ ~ > t; '" '" . 0 c 0 '" 5 0 Q ;; '" u '" :;:; w v; u ~ '" . "E f- ,..'.,..', . E . . . S( . 0- ~ ~ . 0 0 - ~ ~ 0 0 < = = . . " Ilg 0 0 c " E = = ~ ~I~ c '" ~ , ] N N ::l '::: ~ " ~ .~ 0 0 . 0- ./; 'S '0 0 g~ )5 0 '0 '0 '0 'i\ ~ '0 U we ~ 0- " > > - 0: ... w < '" 3 o w ~ il " " " ^ '" ~ . ~ > e ~ ,; . -a ~ J! J . ~ ~ i;> . ~ B ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ eo ~ .iJ o o C . . -5 o . F= ~ . . . B ~ " " ;; o ;; 0- 9 ~ @., c:: ~ o 0 ~j ::; fi ~] . " ~ . ;, sa "'0 ~ 0 ~~ ::: .~ ~- ~ .~ - . o 0 ~-E . ~ ~. ~~ :5 ~ o , ::~ ~ i'l -0 :;i (..; ., ll,E f= e o . "~ s.:l Vl2 ~c ~z ~ . .= a~ . . ~ 5i ~-;: ;;> ll. ~, '8'% <.>' :l\i "::1-- ~ ;;> 5!!8~~ ~ ;t; :;:: -T ~ ~ Vi Vi V'l V7 Io"l ~ OC M ..,. -,0 o -.0 '.0..,. 00 v. \D ::::> ,,0 r-:-o" 01- v 0'< 00 00 r- lI"l ..,. 0 """N~o-OMv5 Vi fA Vi VI ~ ~""i~og;~~ ~i~.-rioo<jOO~ "' 'I:J " o ~ ... 1: " o ~ M2J m~ ..u :c '" " .. I-~ '" ::> '" 1: " o U j '0 u "I"'" -.:t N .,., 0 or, '"1" ('I::=>O r-l M N ,.,.; .,: c: :;:: - a ~ .e ~ ~ --.r;.o \0-0 .s .2 .8 .3 ..,. N N v ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g g N ....~ "'.1 N =c 'n ~ 0'-.0'. '" '" S:::.S ~ o o '" -=.'"" -0 "':J 0 ~ ~ :; ;:; I..l rfl. 02 12 ~ e _~ as" ciS oa ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.... ;>- ;S :s ] 8 ~ ;c ~g B- j1j .~ ::::l.--: ~. j.) 0- 0 :ij B:; 8 .~ ~ E 8. ~ ~ :a ~ -g u ~ '", 2 ~ -0 i- ~ ~ ~ c5 ~i os:::...., lf1 -oE-ogE';;;88 '" ~ a:c :; .!:! ~ 62 ::r: G '" e: ... = ,IL> e~-g2~~8] ] ~ co ~ ~ g ~ ~ E -;; ] ~ 3 ~ ~ '2 " . "3 g t!.s ..5 ;2 ~ ";:; r;:; 3 ~ ~ ~ v ", ~:g Q- r;- ~ (5 W ~ ~,g -g g.3 :; "')2 _ ~ 0 ... :::.z ^^ ~~ 5 E 0", W 0 u:@ - ~ 0::> W ~ ~ " r c ..8 ~ o ~ . . ... ~ 0\ ~ " o ~ ~ ] 1il 1"3 ~ -< "'~ [H ':'-Sl - 0 o . ~ u FC <(Q)~ oom ~o~ .N_ o .0 Zo" ~cn E ",~ 2roCD -:OOJ C1l~C1l v-go.. ~LL OJ <( "' " " o 0: >. c: ~ o ~ .. ...1ii , 0 IllU .!!!" .g .2 1-1;; Ol ., :i! >. c: ~ o t) ~ :! '0 t) 4l ",''''CI ;:!!~ ...:l:E~ a~ S !l '" = =.. 3~ :;; 0. "1" = <",,_ \J;)'<:TOOO 00 0 'n -0' r- on cr~ ".100 N'~ - "'" - \>'7 ~ ~ ~~ :::::::: = . "'~ = - ~Cl ~, &:;s~~ "'j:>o ~ ~~~g; <r1 (', r- 'r, N or, -ct.....: \A<Ab';v) ~'ll = " . " ..< V \C .,. . I- ~ -0 -0", -:::::= as';a - Il.I ~.c:J-o t ~I~ ~, l: V5 OJ '-' ;:; Il.I ... .::l v:::::J~' e e "' ~;2 UU ~ B ~ <;<;2::::) ....: .c.<: ~ ~-~ E ~ = . '" 0. 1:: ~ . " ~ ..!::-o - B:S ?l;:!l 1.) !-; ~ :3 OJ';; ~3=~~~_ 23~3- !.;~~ .-.I::;;; :! '" II.> . . . = ~.... o ~ ;;; ...;:..:.. ~, - -:- ~ ; 1;Uu Vi! ~l ~ ~ ~ . ~ -< -< 'll I~ . " ~~ ~~ E .~ ~~ el - . ~. ;;;~ ~~ ~~ c~ ~3 ;;; .~ ~3 ~] " . " " f'.~ 5~ .: ~ ~ ~ =,U .:~ " ~j V: '" " _Z ~ g " ] .. Ie- ;>, .~ " 2 o~ ~~ . . "'Il. 0:0 v ~ .. - " " '0 ~ 0.. >. " on ~ '" Ill" " 0 :co: " " 1-- .. - III " " .~ .!!! " - III = .. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ c, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C:',' ~ N - c ~ c, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ -,;; ~, . . . ~ ~ '" on . ~" . -::.~ c" ~' .; oc ,..: =' '" oc ..; .; . ~. ~ . 'c, 00 ~ ~ . ~ c, ~ = 8.;E ~ c . ~ N 00 ~ ~ ~ ;:; 00 00 . .; .; C, .; '" c, C, .; .; ~ '" e' = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . u 0'. u::: IlL--.,'-, ~. . ~ ~ 7 ~ c N ~. ~ . '- :!5;~ 7 ~ ~ c ~ C ~ . '" ~ . C, ~ C c, ~ ~ c ~ C . ~ ~ . ~ :i ,..: ..; 0' 0' r-.I '" <'i :! <'i oJ . - ;'C ,_ if, ~, ~ ~ ~ . ~ = . ,r; ~, ~ C, ~" C . ~ ~ c ~ .u ~; .; '" '" ~; 'n ~' oc ..; oJ =' 5~~S- - N N ~ ;;; ;;; . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v; ~ ~ - ;;; ~ ',' ' 7 C. ~ 7 ~ ~ N " ~ N ~ 00 !l :: ~ ~ e' 7 ~ ~ - - ^, N C. . ..; ~. 7 ~ c "' 7 ~, "' =' "' ~ =!i].. n '" c, ...:l."",.< ._~-'. . 'll ~ . = .. e, c, n N 7 N 7 C, N . 'C. ~ =.. ..J,,< . u I'~ CIfj'. e, - ~ c:: n ~ ~. '" 'n . ., ~ N ., ~ - :r - ci ri - - n, ~ - ri I" ~ 5 . 5 5 5 . Iii . 5 '/ .. L ~ L L -e ~ ~ ~ -e -': ~ :5 - :5 :5 co - - :0 " ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ , li - 3 - - - - 2 2 3 "' 7 ~ 7 ~ C, N C, 7 7 . S ~ U ~ U U ~ ~ ~ U = . a; a; ::::s a; C3 '" a; a; " . '" ." Ii! ~ c ~ C C ~ ? '" g :3 ~ ~ 52 . ~ ~ " ;. ;:::1 N e, N c, ;::::-1 N n n " U ~ U . - " '" U '" -0 ~ " " ~. . U 0 ;;: - . " I- ~ < . .2 ::;2 ~ ;J, :;< " . C " ? V >. " . 'D " 0 ~ 0 0 6 .; ~ '-' 0 0 -= > , , or, .g " ~ < - 0 i:: " 0 -,; . ~ -;; ~ u Vi z ;;: " v' Z v' ~ -' ~ 0 " co e " " e ~ U ~ ~ - ;;: c, 0 0 " :;< .. :;; '" " " ~ E 0 ? " 0 ~ 0 2 -;; 6 i;:; n Vi 7 E " - '" c - " "" '0 7 0 7 " - 0 -,; " '" ., V! Z v, .~ u..i Z v' v ,; n . U . "' '" 0 - ~ ~ I '" ~ - ~ " 0.' 2 ,~ ;;: 7 '3 .c: - ~ ~ ~ ~ v v '" - ~ . ~ 2 '" is Q ,;; 7 0; 1,-- c ~ ~ 7 ~ 3 - n 7 - ~ x ~, ~ ~ Vi v '" " Z v '" ~ ~ Vi ~ ::0 ~ Vi '0 -:- . . i> , " u .: = 0 = ~ ~ I . -" ~ - 0: :0 2 ~ " ~ ~ d c g , .9 Iii " N " ~ E ;..... . ~ ;; " '3 " " " 0 " U -g ;: > ~ C L " - . o .5 ~~ "u ~ :< "00 ;:;g .::::<"1 q~ ~ E "Sltl ~O u . " .s . .~ " o rt ~ c " ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ O? '0 ~ ~ . ;;:. ~ '" g 0:;'0 ~c8 ~:€ ~.: o . ~ ~ 0'.9 i5..-g U . .5 0 .;;' ~ o~ . , w . ~ : :; ~ m~ " w f- ~ 8~ ~ " " . 3~ o Vl ij ~o _Z <(J)~ 000> -.0"'- ,,- ,0 '", E-", i':'~ ~roQ) ::>0> .g..o~ c'" "LL. OJ < VI " C> .. - c " '" i:! mrf ,,- -w ~u ,..", c .. c C> 'iij " o . _u "'~ ,~i! ;",,:..t,) _! g,u .~ '.oJ !i u !'~ ~:>1 . . :: = "'.l U a='~ =..;j $; .'t!J...e .!ill ~ .. ~ ~:;~ 0- ~ : ~ ~ ,..: :j <i ..,: 'Ii " ,., ~ ~ g t:! 00 ~ ...-; .-0 ...:i ~ 11 t' ~. a~~~ o "" ~ g e; Q", g ~ ~f, <-- :2 ;g ; ~, '>0.""._ ;:;;~ ...,~ .=( ~ E~ ~u . c p. 1;.)\: is:;:; g ~ :::: o. .-- "'. f; ~ 8" J; ~ :tJ~...,~ ;:r; ,- r. 2 ~ * eo: ~ ~ :;;: ..., ~ . u g, 11 Q co ce,...-, 0- 0'-, '" "" ,..., 0'" C' ~ C p,,' 00 - ~ . ~ ,...-, ~ ~ ~ o g :'?, ..,. .0 00 ,,; '" . ~ .~ ~< N"" .". r'l ~ " e ~ ro g :2 7, .-i r;.-,-i . ~ ~ _ c @ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e '" ~ ~ ~ o 0 C 0 . . " . . Q . ~ " " " " as ci:5 Iii di .. '" \0 '.0 r- ~ ~ g ?, ~ 'c, o 0 " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . :i :i . 0 , (:0 0 3 <3. '" 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -g c ~ ~ e e '" ~ ] '" Q j j ~ OJ ';:.g to. r- g ~ ~ .~ I Q ] o 'C " 0 ~ .c.< :.:: '" o 2- " g i ] ~ " co ~ '" .c.< g ~ ~ i ~ ~ c2 o = ..,: C ; ::: C^ -~ :; E 0", u. t;"iii -~ ~ ~ .c~ u ~ '" u f .g ~ o ~ ~ . e- "? '" ~ ] a ;; " ! " ~ . 0: 2 ~ 8- . " e- 2 5 o U u .s ~ . o ~ .( "'00 I ~ g '[5^;; ~"E '2 ~ \=0 . " E~ ~8 < " ~ ~ ~ 0 "' <(O>~ 000> ~O)~ N_ O .0 ZO", ~~'" c >,~ 2roa> -::l0l l1l ~ l1l '0.00, C'" ",LL Ol <( t/) - t/) o u c: o :;:; Cll ... Cll Co ,... Ql 'en to Ql Ql _"0 .QCll Cll ... 1-" "0 c: Cll Ql OJ c: Cll .c: u ... Ql - c: ~ '" 1'1;; 0) 0) '" '" ... 0) 0) '" r-- lfl '" 0) 0) '" .... "'" I U 0" 0" ,:;i '" .... ,!, "C', 0) 'D ~ ..,. lfl Q,l; 0) "l '" ~ - ,,, 00 ...., '" ",' ; '" 00 00 ,', - "" ... '.. =~( "" '" '" r.1 .-."-. '" 00 (I) 0 0 " S' 0 0 /; f\ N N :: >, '"" .0 " (I)', '" 51 0/) '.9' 'en 'en , ~' " " Q Q , :: ~ [i " :.tI ~ :: 0/) ~ '" o<J " " ~ > '5 a " 0 :5 ~ -0 0.. P- I"." .;<l .3 ~ . !OJ f-< " P- '" 0 0/) 0 .s .s Q :: " > u '" lL ;;; " g vi - -0 ,,; C -0 ~ E I" 1ZJ. l1l " l1l 'i3 ,;<l ~ ~ > ~ ~ c -= 2 0 " 0 .. 0 ~ u '" -= P- >< u " CD ~ -= P- 1:: .;<l .0 '" l1l ~ l1l ,.... f-< '" '- '" 'u g '" 0 CD 0 C ~ -0 l1l Q 'en Q ::l > '" ;; " Vi -0 ~ lL -0 lL l1l l1l .. - " 1:1 ..l .,.' ~ ~ :: .~ " '" ..l = -0 " '" ~ .. , 'l:l l1l - E ::: '" > or) .. " '" - - '" :; ~ '" ~ '" e- o '" :; '" I:J:i U U U U , "-', ::. ~ ~ (I) Q. ~ (I) '> l1l ;p ." l1l :.tI ~ f-< ~ '" Q 0:: .. '-' ~ ';3 -;:: ..l -,:; ~ ~ or) f-< ~ is ~ '" 0:>:: a - N - b,! .S! OJ ;; OJ or) a - '0 '0 r-- l1l '" .!. ,... - ,.. >,>, -", 3 3 CVJ u " ~ -; .- '" :=: 0. e~ " " lL u ~ 0. ..5 c ." ;;; 1:: '" 0. '" C ~ ~ I- ~ ;; .s ~ 0. " Q b!) ~ ~ c: if .~ ~ ~ '" -g '" ~ oil '" " g "0 '" ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ .9 ~ -g $ 0 ~ ~ "";';:: ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~cd r: ~ ~ u .s ",' " ;;; '<3 o '" '" ~ "d ~oo ":3 .~ r-~ <5 ti ".0 -;; ~ " u I~ Q -O:O>~ 000> _,0"- 'J_ .0 Or- ~U') E >>~ 2rom -:;>0> ,"~C1l -0-"0. C'" ",LL OJ -0: >=. - tII "tl Cll o a:: >- - CO t: , :I 100 QI(,) -~ .QtII Cll_ I-tII o (,) 0) t: .~ ... Cll (,) ~ '" or; or; or; on ~ 00 ~ '" ::!,.-, 00 '" - '" '" on 0 ... ." 00, r- 0 '" '" '" <:> 00 ..1' .". ~ ~. 00 -i' ,.:' on 00 ,,,", "" "" '" '" on ..., on "" "" - on ... :,*,-~ "" "" I"" , '" .. i ... .. i - 0= ..., _..;' 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI - 0 0 0 0 0 0 = '" 0 0 0 0 o. ~, <:> ".:- ".:- r-' r-- ." 00 r- .. 0 - '" - '" on .~ - '" 00 '" ."., "l ... "" "" "" ... - C') on -;; .. "" "" "" - U ., Eo< t:!- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 --= '" on 0 0 o. = ~ =, il: 00 00 0 0 0 0 ., ., 0 0 on on '" '" ~ ~ - - '" '" ~, ~- "" "" "" "" - - "" "" :0 = -.. ", '" - en = .. ~.. - '" C') .". on '" ~ ;. '" ." -~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..., ~ '" '" '" "' '" '" oi'; ~ <:: <l) <l) <l) <l) <l) <l) ~ >- >- >- >- >- >- <l) .~ = .~ Eo< .. ." .. ..l -; = .. , .. =- ..l .. '" =- .. ... +-' +-' - .. .. ~ ~ '" '" Q. ., - - U '" ~ --C '" 0 .. .. .. U '" :5 :5 = Q. .. ";;:. E .. .c -- ~ - .s =- G3 G3 ... '- ... ;., U U .. 0 ... I~ ~ ~ U - ... = ,,; ti = .. ,~ ;:; ;:; ;; .. U ~ ~ '" ~ '" 0 0 = = - ... - <l) <l) 0 0 0 .. .. 0 0 '" '" U U E-< =- Z ~ .. '" -0 " o I:Q ~ " " ;. ~ ~ !-< ~ "' o .,., o iil it:' .B ~ g 5~ 0 S- ''5. ~ 5 .5 E e! 0 '0 ::l Q.) U == ~ ...::::: -5 (\) ~ ~ ~~ .~ [ 1:: ~'r;; ~ 0 ;>. g" ~ jg = '0;) ..0 of-o'* ~n.i] ~.S g'ra ~ g~ =: -0 "'0..... ~ (lj .;;; @~~~ 5.g~ ~ ;>..0'- -0 = E: 2 "'C "5 Q.) .- ;n ::: o..!:!:.a :a ~""2 s g~~~~..o~u_~ (ljc<:lu<o.Q.)__"~ t:: E >. "'0 ...... ~ o ''::;::::: ~ u E 8 ~ 0. ~ c<:I ::l Q.)...... - ie II.) ~ r.n'0' tl ~ . E m ....... C.- ..... <U c<:I Q.) ct':Jc......o.o = f-uc<:ld:::::>:Gc<:I >. OJ "'0 ~ c<:I'';:: ~ -;: . ~ ] ~ ~~ ~ u ~ ,6 o - 0 IV I:':l..... rJ'J u~s":~~g-~ ~ ;;..:2..c;:: a 8 = U c:: ":::kiEOrJ'Jc<:I~gf ~ <5 0. ::l 3 ~ Q.) ~';;' ~ U-EO~<U~ot: ~ 8~~~~~=i3G'k) 3~,St.s5.~"'aE~ ,9 ~ 2 _= 2 2 tl C ~ ~ 'n_r-o "" o.l-Cv "0 Z o .,., <;; -S -0 ~ "' g ~ " ,"" --.---- _NM<<::t<.n\C ------ >,>, --0 C ~ ~ - ovo U" k - " "' ,_ -0 '" 0. 0;:0 U " " "' " u a ;. al .5 -0 '@ 0. ~ " <2 - u "' 0. .s " .g "' t o 0. ~ " "' k !-< M " '2 ~ o ~ -0 " "' ~ " g "0 <B -s .~ o dl - ~ 'in ~ .3 -0 " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~eoj E ] '" " <;; 'u 0 ~ '" ~ o<l 00 k <::> " 0 ;. N 0 k " " .n -;; E -0 " " u " ~ Q .a:Q)~ 000l ~O~ .N_ o .0 ZOO) ~ ~cn e >,~ 2cum -:JOJ C1l ~ C1l ".o(L e '" ",LL. OJ .a: Ul "C ell o ~ Ql 0).... , ell Ill.... (J) Ql- - III ..0.... ell III I- 0 (,,) Cl c: .~ "- ell (,,) '=- ~ -0 " o ::0 g " " " " ~ ~ ~ f-< ~ ~ " <n o ._ ~ t:::~ .B ~ o 'Q ~ E. ~ :3 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ iG '::l .- iU ..c?; ~~.~.~ ~ ro ~ t':l -:=: .~ e-~ -E. ~ rJl a s:: (3 .~ a u sn]~g ~~ ;: :-Q ~ u c: -5 8 > t':l.~ 0 t':l 0: [] ~ rJl ] ~ ~ ~ ~~_]~~E t :: >. ""0 0... (::; o'-==&u~8 ~ a3 ~ ::l .::!...;:: ~ ~ tl S .~ e' ~ ~ "-8:;v=~~ 02:!"E :->ca'':::~ c: .;:::: :> ,ij :... ~ :::l ;;- c.J3 ,..- o cpa:; ,:j~~]~ 1! ...D ~ C. = ~ c: ~ (1. t':l -0 o...::l ~ U ucg~,~""O V ~ c:a rJl _'~ 2&'TS~~5. 5~o_~oo (/]~t- -r---r- :!, 0 0 0 0 00 ~1 ..., ~ '" 0 0 '" 0 N ..., . .... "0 N ..". '" ~ M .... 0 .... ".. r---" '" M N ..".- ", on ..;- =- "" - ..". r--- '" .... "" - "" "" "" on .... .. '" "" '" '" ..' ... .. - " = ,.., """"; .we:'": 0 0 0 0 ~ x =' 0 0 0 0 = !:J, 0 0 0 3 '" 25 Q 0 0" 0 0; ~" 5 "0 N .. '" N r--- N r, ~ .~ - M ~ .'" .."., '" ... "" "" "" ... ... - M '" .. "" "" '" - U Q Eo< , tl- 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 = "0 0 0 0 0 '" .,-, .. 0 0" 0 0" 0:- 0:- = ~ Q '" '" '" '" 0 0 ~ Q - - '" '" ~. oc ... ... "" "" "" "" - - Q '" "" '" ~ -.. ;:: - ;;: :; -.. - N M ..". '" '" ~ .:: ;:: = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ..;: ~ "s " '" '" '" '" '" v v v v v v ;.: E:: >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< >-< ;:: -- ~ .. '0 ;:: -l -; :; ... "" -l .. ~ "" '" ... - ~ '" . ~ Q, 0 - U - ~ " 0 .. .. .5 ~ u '" :;:; ~ .. gf -= ::. cu ;;..-. .... "" W ... ... os:. ... '-' ~ '" Q ... -.., U - ... 51 - .:: .:: - '" 5b> ;::: ... " U ':;; ,- '" :!J :!J " ~ 0 0 :5 0 - ... ts v 0 .. a ace: ce: u u "" z ::::-N;:;;~c:):O -~-'--- o <n '" a 5 " u " '" " -0 ~ ,5 -0 '@ 0. ~ " ~ u ~ '" ,5 c..2 .5 g ... ~ 0" e - " ~ [: r: " "0 c." Eo -02 .!!:!..c 0..-::: ''':;:: ~ :; :n S .~ -~ <n 0 a - ,,-0 - " ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 12 ~t':l >,>, c-g " - 0", U " .~ :@ :::: 0. 0::0 U" " "-< u ~ 0. ..s " ,9 1tt t o 0. :!J a ~ f-< 1tt -5 -0 " 1tt .g ~ " .-;!l - di t; v U c.~ ~v; en .s 8 ~ .s@fE ~ ';;'<2 o ~ 2 '5": ~ 2 E t) ~~ ....l ij [::'0 ~z u .s "' " 1tt 'u o ~ ~ .,; "6 ~oo ,,0 "g q ~ ,,-;:: I] ~ f-<O <l:"'~ 000> -'--0 ~ "- o ~O> ~'" E c~ 2cuQ) -::>0> (1)~(1) 'Q..oa. cO; "lJ.. Ol <l: c .. ii: 'C .. C .~ U; C o U .. :c 'ijj .. .. 0"" ~>. m:; CD "0 :c ~ ~ .5 .... "- I- e: -' o '" o N >. - c " o U ~ ~ '0 u ';1! .~ -~ :i!< ~€ .~ .. ~ ~ . . ~'-' o 0 0 of -.0 ,:::T", 0 <'I 0 C' t- r-_ <>0 ro 0 \0 \0 -.0 .", '" C' 00 0,..., 0 00 '" ~I"" 0 00 0 \0 00 "" ..., t- ,:;I~ 0 \0 r- 0 ...... 0- \0 r-. 0...., \0 00 0 rl C' ,..., '" O<J ..,- - ...... .,. ~ "" ,-, ~o oo,....,....,~\Oo\O \0 ,..,t-\O~W~'" "'000000 ~""'Or,"'r,oo 00 ~~~~~ '~d~rr~d ~~d~d~d~~~ri~~~~~ri~~~~~~~~~ _ '" or, '" \0"-, rl......,..., '" """T'..o,.-, \0 \0 '" ,.., r, \0 <"'. \0..., <Xl rl"" '<t '" \0 - 0 \0 ..., r,_ _ 1i:E ~ . ~~ < . '-' 00000 00 "'''' "'''' 00'"",0 00 0 c"'''' 00 !Xl _ ff, ..., ...., ...,...... ""-,"'-,00 00 ...... .... 00 _ _ M ",..,.., _ 0 "" "" 0 rl rl ..., co '" ",,,,,,,,,,0''''''''''''''''' ....,,..,'" ..., "'~"'...,,..,,..,"'''' '" 0000000'0000"'0'0- ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~dd~dci~,..,~ ,.., _...,,...,...,,.., ",on...,,,,'" _..., f:5' 2 . ~e ~g~or' r,r,_ gi i _ "''''''' r,ogg8r'''''''~'''o "'''' 000'00 0'0'0-"''''0'0'0' ,,",0'''',,",'''''''''0'0'0'0-00 "''''''' 0'0000 0'0- ~~ d~dd~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~d ~~~dd~dd~~~ "'...,"'''',..,,..,...,...,,..,...,...,..., ,..,...,...,...,...,..., ...,"'...,"'''''''''''''...,'''''' ...,..., ~c ~i i5' . ~! .~ l~ 'll ~ ~, fl-- ~ ~ 0000 0 iogi~i~oo : ;;".;,,,-:~:;;:;;~:~""' 00000000000 0 000000000 ","co 00 00 0 0 or, ." o-,,*O'.,.r- '" ....;....;'" -D"';'''' - '" '" ,., 000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000 000 o :;) 00 '" 0 .... ." ~, .D 0 .... 0 0 co 00 '" 00 0 >0 "T 0 >0 00 0 or; or; 0 0 >0 0 '" "T "T >0 co 0 "" 0 ..-i ,,; ~i"': g ~, '" .D .,,: r-i .,,: ~i S j--' >0 ,-.: -i- -D OO"D ......; -c ...; 00 ..,f 0 d. ,; .,: 0- ;::-; ~ -...; r-i ~ 00 '" ~I ~'I r-, I'l "T N '" r-, '" r-I '" ,., r-' '" '" '" "" '"' r-J r-, '<t .,. .... '" I'l '"' "* ~I n r-l I'l r-I ~ ~ .... -D '" '"' "T "T a l ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ : :: ~ g 0 ~ co ~ ~ g : ~ ~ : : ~ ~ ~ s; ~. g ~ ~ 0 -i- _ r-i ~ ~ ~ : ~: ~ ~ ~ ii ~ e ~ .5 n '" '"' '"' '" "T '" ~ "* "T"'1" "T "T "T "T.... r-I '"' "* "* '"' "T "T.....,.....,..... "'.... '" '" '" '" "'.,. '" ~ r-I.,. v ~ ~ 0 2 2 c 2 ~ 0 0 022 0 coo a 202 2 2 E 0 0 0 0 E E E E E 0 E E 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 .,. .,..... '"' I'l '"J 0 0 '"' _ coo rl rl 0.,. I'l "T ....- "T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . ~ "E'ii ~" ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i c ~ ~ ~ .. a ~ ~ ace ~ ~ ~ c ~ c 5 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L~~L~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~-,~ " ~ a a a @ ~~~-e~-e ~~~::.>~::> ~ " " ~ g '" ;:;: -ocr:: c ~ _ ~~ ~v -0 '" 8 ~-o ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ -0 ",i~ ~ -0 m ~ ~ ~ -0 , " -0 '":0 ~:3 if.,~ a::r:::li ~ 6:: a ~ ~ [fl _" -0 ::r:: , ..', ~ t i H ~ ~: H) ~ j % H ,~~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ . ~ ~ " ~ -0 -o21i '; ~a~2 ~ !:: c.;"! 0 "" ! ~ _~ ,0 ~ ~ ~ " ~.~"':::wQ ~ " ~ ~:i2 . . . o ,0 ~ ~ ~ E e ~ ~ \ ~ ] ::r:: ;:;:::r:: -0 ~ J ~ o~ ~~i-o]-o; -o~]]o;_ ~~ ~ -0 ~; ~ ~ ~ -0 ~ 8 if. -::r:: ~~_L~~~@if. ~-o~8-o::r:: .~~ ~3~ ~2ffi~~ ~~ Z~~=~~~~~~~2~ ~-O~~~:iu_",~] ~~~ ~j~;~~~]r-:~~]~;~~;]3~li1~~~~p~~~~~;6~~~~~ " . . '0 ~ 'C ~ " 33- j ~~ ~ -0-0 ~ ~~~, ~ -o-o-o-oaa . ~ ,. O::r::::r::::r:: 2~ -o-o-o-o-o-o~ ~ ~~-og] ~ ~ ~ ,,~ ca~ -oo_::r::::r:: B~,"",]]~ ~~ ~ _ . ~~~~~~~~~~u~w ~~~u~ ~~~-~~~~~~ro~~_~-o ~33~~~ ~-o~~~~t w____~'":O~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~a~~~~~~-o~~~aa]]~ju~~~~cooo~~~~~_~a~ ~~~~~~ ~_ _ ~ ~~E5~gg::r::~u~~~~u';~~~~~~ t~cg ~"'rl ~~~3ZZZ~~Z~~~~~~E~~~~~~~::r::~~~~~~~~~;~~ , ~, ~ . .~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , " " " ~ , ~ . , , , ~ " " " , ~ ~ , , , , " ~ , , , , 5 , , , , , , , , 5 ~ , " , 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 . 0 c c ~ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 G c 0 " " " " " " " " " " " " " .~ " " " " " " " " " v W '-' " " " " " " >. ~ ~] 000 u . .~~ = ~ 8~ ~ ~ " f " .g ~ ~ . " ~ " "' u .s l~ " 'v ~ ;;; "' ro J2 Il~ll - " ~ ~ ~c; <(Q)~ 00(1) ~O~ .N_ o _0 ZOO ~(O E c~ .$ row -:00> <1l~<1l '0,00. C'" ",LL 0> <( c: ~ ;;: ." " c: "j! OJ c: o c.> " :c S'"iij " ~ " " c:u. ~>. a=; ~'(j oc: ~ ~ , c: mu:: !!!o.. .0>- ~5 o M o N ,., 'E " o c.> ~ :! '0 c.> 8~lg ;2 ~ ~ ~'o '" ~ ~I~ "';'""",:><i.o"'C; ..,r .t,...." ..... r- '" ~ c"", ''-' -D rl '011 .;:g ~.. ..€ . . ~~ ~~ :~':€ :::!. .,~" t.C> !Ii if'; o - ..,-",j- 0> '" '" n '" "";"'-;00"",,,"':";- ...,...., -...., "'''' ","'c-, "'''''''''''"''0000 ....;,.."..; 0 ci d .-,..,..., .,.,"'.,.., 00000 o 00 0'0--_ ;:.'",.0...,;;:; C f'l g 8 ."""""','':''', o ~ ~:;;~: ~ g 88 'n", ,.... c- ..,...,. .~; ~ ff'...,.ri-D II",'" ~fi~gg g8 g.,.,;~gg ~! -i d -i r; ri ..,. 00 r-~...; q .3", ! 'J ~...' '!':<:"" -tr,r,r,.,.,..,..,. r.e,..,...,. .. i:o 0 g g 5 0 "g """ ;',_,~:,". f'i .......'"'.....:..... _ 0 B ~ I ' ~-. a: ,s" '''i;> ." =!- -t,J OO~:; ..,...,...,...,."".,c-c "''to .0 " cE:o 0 C E: E: 0 Cl v c- 00 r, <'I"" r,'" .,...,...,. r, r. ~j . . ~'" I : 2~E.22~~ 182-<:.2 .!o< :3::; :J;:J:'5 ::::;:s:s :" .':. ! " :', , '. ",.' -~ - , 0'" 3: 0:: ... ~iJH o 0" 0 -" ~':;';~;;2:::S ~ < ~;~~~ :~~!: ,. ""'"-0,, Ei2ia2ii:Q " - - o J!i] 11.> -,-_ C; ;':;3::::::::<..- . . ~ ~ ~;'" ~' 3: 55'=:; g o <:> '" 0 0 vvvc...:.... ~ 'J= " " .0 ~15 ~ :3 -C'O:: "" 0::::> :l::: ,--~'g ~ ;::;,,0:: .", :; ~I~ :i 15 .", ,-,I;;; 0 C; 00 '" <:. " 0 , ~ " ~..,. ~ ,~~ 8 o ;:; a ~ " "ij.o -:J5~ II.> .2 cO co" '-.J(f,r>:: ~ ~ M o.~ 00 ~. gf.~8 --. "T.'1". o '^ ~8 if>'dri '^ ~l ~l ~ ~L, ;;:;"" .c o 0 ~ po 2? .j,..-,cj,,.., .,...,. '" " " _ '" ~J ~I n n "C _ " 0 -"..o..o-e ;::;:...;,;::; o , S, ;;:;-0 ~2:; OJ 0-" ~ ~I~ r>:: - - c; ""CL: iS-o ~.,,'""~ B _ ;; j; :"<:.1 ,::: c - C ~ ~ ~ "'~ GO~ ~~~ o o' . . 00:::> oc:::> OCC_,,,,, '~, . >.:;:>c: .c oo_ie_=> ~;?;~~i~ $o? ..,.""..,. c; ? .L;;.Lo..Q :3'"': ;3 " " :;; ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ 2c: ~ z _ ." " " , "" iJ:iJ:S o . ;;:; 'f.':'::,::?- CL: '"" ~ : ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ 2 ~ ~ a '-'.o-o-o_r>::::.:: r>:: .",~ 5""~~~.::yy::::::,.,:i,, ~ ~"~;;;a ~~~::~'/) iOe- o80;!~'" "'. c-~ "'". ~ =; ~ ~:! C-:t ~ ~ C-l .;~'" , f€ o E C~ u. "~ .g = ~ cc:> G '" . "' , ! c "g " ~ " , >= ;.-~ ~~ " "' . -& c:> g ;0 ~ " -;;:: s :; g . ~ ;"$2 ~ ~ c . uo .,..:; ~~ 1:; i-j c . ~ .9 "" - . = :g :: M o E ~ " N' ~' ... 3 - -= g _5 i_-... ::: ~ ~ - .i <:> ~ ~ ] ]; <>" - ::: - " - - ~ " ... 0.. t; g~'~G ..~a~<~~ ~j ~~~(/)o; =-z ~ c "0 VV '" '" c c cc ~ ~ ~~~c:;:/) ~ *" u @ -< "00 "g~ C t ~E ~ 1::: c::~ Agenda Item No, 10A February 10, 2009 Page 161 of 191 APPENDIX C Credit Component Calculation Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 162 of 191 Credit Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the credit component. Currently, in addition to the capital support that ultimately results from state fuel tax revenues, Collier County also receive financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of these, County fuel taxes are listed below, along with a few pertinent characteristics of each. 1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2~/gallon) . Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Collected in accordance with Article XlI, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution. . The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to counties after first withholding amounts pledged for debt service on honds issued pursuant to provisions of the State Constitution for road and hridge purposes. . The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program within the county. 2. County Fuel Tax (1~/gallon) . Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. . Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. . Proceeds are to be used for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths, and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. 3. 1" Local Option Tax (6~/gallon) . Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold withiu a county. . Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. . To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a county is levying the tax on motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate. . Proceeds are distributed to a county aud its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution scheme, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 C-I Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 163 of 191 4. 2nd Local Option Tax (5~/gallon) o Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. o Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted local government comprehensive plan. o Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution scheme, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. 5. Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax (1~/gallon) o Tax is on every net gallon of motor fuel sold within a county. o Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. o To accommodate statewide equalization, this tax is automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a county is levying the tax on motor fuel at all. o Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. Each year, the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) produces a document, the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the estimated local government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this document are the estimated distributions of the various fuel tax revenues for each county in the state. The 2008-09 data represents projected fuel tax distributions to Collier County for the upcoming fiscal year. In the table, the fuel tax revenue data are utilized to calculate the value per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the "equivalent pennies" of other revenue sources. Table C-I shows the distribution per penny for each of the fuel levies, and then the calculation of the weighted average for the value of a penny of fuel tax. The weighting procedure takes into account the differing amount of revenues generated for the various types of gas tax revenues. The weighted average figure of approximately $1.4 million is used in the value per penny calculation. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 C-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study <(Q)~ aDO> ~O~ .N_ o .0 ZO" ~<O E >-~ 2mQ.l -:OOJ ",-", ".00.. e'" Q)LL OJ <( ... .2 E ~ Cl o ...- a..'=- CD Cli9 ~ClC) a.O ClIO UN 0>- _u. -g vi _ Gl co; ...U:: . 0 ClI U = a. Gl <I:'u :a cOc ClI 0 :J I-:;::;:E :J .00/1 :5>. .~ 1: Cl:J >< 0 CllU I- ... ai .!!! :J- u.8 't:l Gl - Cll E :;::; t/) W " - '" "'" '" 00 .~ ~ M M v; v; '" o. 0 M ~. ~ '" M ~ 00 t"- oo '" - C N M "'" 0 N .... " " - o-.~. '" "! ""', .... :S~ N - - - - ...;- l:l ... "" "" "" "" "" ... '" " Q ~ 00 - "'" N '" .... N M M t"- v; N C 0 0 0 "! o. .... " .S ~. ~ 0" 00 00 00 OJ - "'" M '" M N M " N "'. O. 0, ""'- ~ - .c '" .. .~ - 00 ~ - - "" ... "" "" "" "" "" N - ... '" I Q N - ~ v; - on ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 - " 0 0 6 0 6 0 -l c "" "" "" "" "" ... '- .s .. OJ - "" " " ... S ~ ~.' , - - ~ ~ ;: " '" >< " u u "" v;> M i- "? - >< -<II .. OJ ~ "" ~ OJ) .. " >< c " " "". LL .2 OJ ... "" .2 " -;; ,.... " ;. "5- c.. LL C OJ 0 ~ .2 " 0 ;: "0 3 LL -;; -;; " ~ u U >, u .3 ~ ;: 0 -5 OJ 0. :!2 -' 5 " "0 " - '0:; 0 ~ c Z .. ~ U U - N ... c g :; ,s " ~ 'i3 -;; S ~ 00 E:=: ~ >. u.c -"-0 - u CD:"::: C 0. :.:2::S ~ " ';'.E .c _ "0 3 u= ] ~ o _ u u " 0. u '" .~ .~ 2~ .-= o :..> ~ 3 <l) v: 0. ~ ~~_w~~ - - o c 5 :C'':: ~ U=.E~ 1.1 ;::: 'C '::::: ::: c::i V; >, ]0~~ ~ - ~2 1.1 ;:: ~ ~ ......l ::i:!l!...... (l:;"'; ;;~ "2 ":::; "0 ...... c;-8~;p ~3~~ i.i '= ~ > ;.; '::=:..0 g ~ ~ ~ Vl~f-<;;; :>,:>, Eog " - 0'" U" - ;;:; ~"O _ 0. 0;:' U u " LL U ~ 0. ..9 c g ;;:; t " 0. ~ C ~ ~ ,;; 2 ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ - ;:; > " Cl) ] '"' u - ~ - CO u c 1:- " ;; 'u " ~ ~ ~ "dO<) -0 "0 >N o ~ v~ led C liE ~ ~a Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 165 of 191 Gas Tax Equivalent Credit A revenue credit for the annual gas tax equivalent expenditures on roadway capacity expansion projects in Collier County is presented below. The two components of the credit are as follows: . County gas tax equivalent pennies . State gas tax expenditures County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies A review of the County's FY 2009-2013 Transportation Work Program indicates that a combination of gas tax revenues, impact fees, grants, and ad valorem taxes are used to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. Collier County receives a credit of 4.9 pennies for the portion of gas tax revenues dedicated to capacity expansion projects in the 5-year work program and 9.6 pennies for debt service payments on the 2005 gas tax revenue bond. Based on discussion with County staff, all bond proceeds were expended on roadway capacity expansion projects. In addition to the gas tax and debt service, approximately $20 million of grant funds (totaling 2.8 equivalent pennies) are being used to fund roadway expansion projects. Thus, a credit of 17.3 equivalent pennies will be given for the allocation of funds the county collects in gas tax revenues and grants. Table C-2 County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies Cost of Projects': Number of Years Revenue from 1 p~ri~y(~) Equivaleut Pen'riieS(~' \'" Gas Tax Revenues (2008-2013)'1) 2005 Gas Tax Revenue Bond Debt Servicec1 Grant Revenues (2008-2013)13) Total (1) Source: Table C-4, Item (c) (2) Source: Table C-4, Item (a) (3) Source: Table C-4, Item (b) (4) Source: Table C-I (5) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 4) divided by 100. $35.218,000 $69,370,000 $70 000 000 $124,588,000 5 $1,449.228 5 $1,449,228 5 $1.449.228 $0.049 $0.096 $Q.Q2Ji $0.173 Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 C-4 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 166 of 191 State Gas Tax Expenditures In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) Work Program was reviewed for capacity expansion projects in Collier County for the l7-year period from FY 1997 to 2013. The six years of "future" roadway projects from FY 2008-2013 Work Prob'Tam indicate a total state expenditure of approximately $97.8 million for capacity-adding projects in the County. On an annual basis, this level of expenditure is equivalent to 11.2 pennies of gas tax revenue. Comparatively, the total cost of the capacity-adding projects for the six-year and five-year "historical" periods are as follows: . The FY 2002 to 2007 Work Plan equates to 16.2 pennies; and . The FY 1997 to 200 I Work Plan equates to 13.1 pennies. The combined weighted average over the l7-year total of state expenditures in the County for capacity-adding roadway projects results in a total equivalency of 13.5 pennies. Table C-3 documents this calculation. The specific State projects that were utilized in the equivalent penny calculations are summarized in Tahles C-5 through C-7. Table C-3 Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion Revenue Equivalent Credit , Cost of Number ,..' from 1 Projects of YearS Pennies(S) , " . penny(') Future Work Program (2008.2013)(1) $97.789.432 6 $1.449.228 $0.112 Historical Work Program (2002-2007)'" $140.704.668 6 $1.449.228 $0.162 Historical Work Program (t 997-20011''' $94.717.412 5 $ t .449.228 $0,131 Weighted Averaue $333,211,512 17 $1,449,228 $0.135 (t) Source: Table C -7, Total Cost of ExpansJOn Projects (2) Source: Table C-6, Total Cost of Expansion Projects (3) Source: Table C-5, Total Cost of Expansion Projects (4) Source: Table C-1 (5) Cost of projects divided by number of year, divided by revenue from I penny (Item 4) divided by 100. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 C-5 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study .o:Q)~ oom ~o~ '-'- _0 'r-- -", E >-~ 2mw ::>0> ro~ro "ODD.. eQ) ",U- rn .0: z. 'U ca 0. ca (,) >- ca ~ "'C ca o 0:: I t/) ~ :::J - :s e CIl 0. >< W;=- -- e,l!l ~u ca CIl V>"- (,)' ._ 0 :::J ... CIl c-o. ..eWe ca >< .2 I-cat/) I- e t/) ca cao. C)>< W Z. e :::J o (,) ... CIl "'5 (,) M ..... o N >- u.. I 0) o o N >- u.. g,: ..'" - ,S' ~ 'ii1 C)" Cl,) Q,E d_ll,) =..> ~a: ,., e -t:= Q';. f"Jl'~> = C)\.,-.. Q~ O"y_, ~>.~:.,- ::.<,,- ~i.i~::: ~ '" ~ ~ .Q ~ o o o o r-- '" 0;: '"' "" :::> :::> :::> ,.:- ..,. - on :::> ,., '" o 0 000 o 0 0 0 0 OOOOO~ 6o"or-:oo o 0 0 "1' o 0 0 ~ N 6 6 0 u) ..,..-7 r-- V) N \0 r0 _&'7;;Av;}&'7 "" ~ '" - '" " o .. ~ :: " z ~ e " .. o e; ;;. -= < " '" "" '" '" '" ~ '" - :: " S >. '" ~ '" '" '> .. '" rrJ '" '" o - -= " - '" '" :s " -= '" " :: :: " > " ~ e; - o "" - .c " Q '" <U <U "" s i; '- u '.!, S. B ..e ~ ;;: -.. <U 0. ::E e; u .,. !l '" '" o u '" "51 S 10< 00 '" 'S g "; .. S Q " ~ '" " '" ;J u. :!. :: -:: '" :: '" Q, '" " ;.. - '<:J '" Q, '" '" o - -= " - '" _:i -= " -= ~ '" .g is 0. '" " "" ~ '" ~ '" '" Q ~ -= ~ o o o 0;: N 0-, 0-,' N "" ~-- .g is 0. x '" f--< '" il is "' > " -< - " ~ o 'en '" ;J u c '" ;J ,- 0"" U c o V"" ,- u _ w o ~ UOl ~. (5 ~ cr.-d E E ~ (1) ~ u > c " ~ ~=a ""S! 0. u ~8~ c: "E ~ ~.~ '" - '" -g '"E g ~ "0 G tl ~ ~ "- .. ~ '" >; 0...5 19 ~ E <n "2 g % " u "" E ~ 0 E ti g 8 q:::.= a:; <:<:1:-: :l E [Il E 5 B g \D ;> t:: ~ ."f ~ vi ~ >- 0 S cil O..l=: ~ ~ ~ ::; ~ [Il 'u -o~.Q.263 g ~ ...... ~ ~ -;:: 0 c....... Vl <:tl 0 [Il .s g 61.5 -g c..-a -€g-~~:€~a 's:.::: :=: 5. ~ ~ ~ ... ~ 0.. IIJ...... ~="Bce'"3.;:~ ~i2-g~'-g~o ~J:!<.2u~ur.S oco~o>-..... .!:l.9 ~ f3..o O'S: [Il _ _ _ '"'d ;;;> - ::::::: CfJ:.Q CfJ .2:! .~ <:tl U 0 U ::l (Il rJl ;z t;;; ~ ~ .n 'm 'll 1lJ"::: -='C ~ ~ >.......::: ...... ti 0 - - ~ 0 ~.- ...... ~'(3 l,f'") ~ l,f'") "0 "'0 'll \":l E ~ r:::' Q) ~g..2:!s5~E~ g,u~:::Jt:-IIJO <:tl B r/J --< rJ::':::: a a. "'0 "'0 '-"___ _13C('f'):::C::~ .S! ~ -2 0 t2 0 }<j ~UbJJNbJJ.-E~~ v;;S c:: ' c:: 0 oj c v .2 ~ .2 a.....: ;::: "'0....... 0....... ~ '-" 5 rJ:: S N a El a3 u~v:><vEU F:5~~~~v~ 1],>_J:;-Bb~ ~ (.0.. - (.0.. ~ v ~-;~g~~~ r;j .2 .2 "'0 0 ~ - vvt:~.~v,5 CCOQO.J::; r-<r-<o...o::lo...t---B --------- ----- 0 C~~ et:Z 0>' c"" ;J ;J o - U~ ]:@ 05 U" u 0.. - u ~ "- !i c " ;;; 1:: o "- '" C ~ '" u oj .s "' " ;;; 'u o ~ ~ -< "doo o o N .. " "" E u u " Cl - " .::: q " I~ "O>~ 000> ~O~ .N_ o _0 ZOOO ~<D E >,~ 2roal -"0> ro ~ ro "O.o(L c:: '" ",LL 0> " VI - " " '0' ~ 0.. c:: o 'iij c:: '" c. ~ W >> 'E '" o () ~ " It'): u8 .!!!I .gE t- '" ~ Ol o ~ 0.. .l< ~ o s: .. !I~~aa~~oaa~ ~__0~~N R~~~~gg~~gg~gggg~~ ~[~~~~~ '~~~0~~~~~~~ ]~~~~~~~~~~MX~~_~~~ =~~ ~~ '~~~-0---- M~ ~ - - -~ ~ -~ - -~- - I;.,;.,. I'~ ~ u . " - . . -~ ~ ~ : 0::> U ~ .2~ ~ ~ ::::l~ ~ ,~ .g~ ~tiwJ r:: E 2: ::: :::"'8 5~~ e " ~~ ~ - ~~ CO ~I -- ~~.:- ~.~~,g~ ~~ g ~:;, M :>:"...J g~~ ;;:~ i:: g8~.;; o""L'''; NOr-- - ~ ~ g: 0<> 0-.. ~ ~ - ~ i:: f;\~;C~ ~~~ :o~ ~ '" ~ ~ -~~ ,. ... ~:AdV; e-. o. v-~ - ~ ~ ~;q~ ~~ i:: l;;~ ~ . - ~ ~~ ~~ -~ r= ~ o o N ... 0> 0> ~ >- U. t- O C u. 'g t> r2~ ~"'O o . ~2 CO 8 o ;;:; ~:2 - 'n ""0'0' v.:::.::c:.:: -'v:. v:. :::0 <"". 0' r-- _'~N a'r. ,...,.....,f..,f ::> 0' "". cr, ~ N """ ,,[ . ~~ ::> or, 0' _:::> "'" .r,,...., _::> ~~ ~ ,",i~ cC - ~ "': Vl ~ ~ ~ ~ 0'. or, 'r. ~~~ 0\ N 0'; ,r: o\d ~N~ M '"" 'r. .~~ ~ 00'000 0..,...,._ 01'--00 :i....;"; or, r- N """"'f'- ~ ~ ;!i?c2;J; r-N"""~-.o "'N""; 0''': 000' -0,",1::;' '-0 <"'I::::: ~~~<A-:A ..,.~c..,.~ :;::,...,0....,....._ ..,. 0'" c .6 ",j,....; cC OOIA "'" :;: ::9~~;?-D~g~~Si ~. ,- ~ C 0 ;623~~ig::.> 0''''''''''''''-0''''' -i1A1/) v; 'r;- ~ ~ ~0'~:z'O~ DC <"'I"'".., ::>r-:""v::,o N - "I 0' 00 ""''''''''_<>'I '" ~ or,O' ::>::>.::;,_ ..,. 0;,.<;..... "'" ~ jcC~ N..,. N ~ ~ ~ ;\ -g . 0 ci2'" , 8~ . ;:; ;:; ~I] 2 3 ~ ~ c _19 5 ':S 6 5~ ~I~ B E =- o " :) c -.E '7"""" ~~::r. ~ ~ - 0> ~..,. -0 '=' r./J '~v ::::. -.:j-..,.-.:r ~~,or. ..........::::. 2 E ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~g~ = > I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i j!]] J ~@~@~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~:~~~=:3:~ ~ ~ 0> ~ ~ V ~ ~ v C 0 ~ ::!:5.5':~~jj~~_.J :g-o,o:s::g:g:g.,..,>::l.... '"-0 <:?3;;:<<<r:<~r-~<' :Il:~ " <. ot;~ g~ '" '" ~ 0 ~i " 0 e: . "';: ~ ;;; ~ :"'" ~ .:i ft;; - 0 '" ::: ~~ ~ ~ i~ ~~"'~2g c- 0- 0" ~ 5 ~ -----:;f..,. ~~ ::z ~~:~~~~~ '::!'0'S::::::::!'00S:: N hi' ~I' ~ ~. .....,'..c 0..,. ~~ 0::>0 _""0:::..... ~ ~~ 00:,.000 ""I'- .,-,(A ""'-'l..c ~ '" ~ '" u co . e ," ~ '"O~ ~ ~ :;~ ~.g ?:, ~ j ~ 2- <; c:: :1" :; ;:;,: ::!' _ ~C:C."" cr-'Vl::i1 ~ ~ ; Q .g8 j~ V:_2,__3 2~~-~ ~~~.~~ " o _ ~ gV;~~~ ~ ~.,.~ ~ ~ ...-;,..; ~ M ~ o_~ g8"'" !< 00 ::~ o~ _00 ;A"".....<"') ~ d" of' ..... ;;:: ,0 ;;; ~ -~z ~-~ ::>;A on ~ ~ ,...., r-i ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ v . " .s o 2 11 o "" o " f- 5,r,V;~ ~ ~ i2f ~ ~ v, ... ;;; ;:;;~ '" ., ~ o ..; ;;; ~ u I~ ci2 o o I~ i ~ f & ~ ~ :3 g i , ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 0 o " ;:::;;< i': :; c ~ :$:, g j! .:5 i o (5 o o 3 3 ;!;;"'g ;;62 c ~ ~ u .s o . " l~ " ~ ~ g __ N 3 ~ ~"E ~ .., ~~ -<O>~ 000> -~:: ,0 >cn ~<D E >-~ 200m -:;:JO> "'~'" ".on.. "OJ Q)LL. 0> -< '" - " .. '0' ~ II. l: o 'iij l: " Q, )( W :>. 'E ::l o U ~ ~ <0'0 ,ju .. I :EE " " "'5, o ~ II. '" (; == .... <:> <:> N N <:> <:> N > u.. ... o c u.. . ~ g ~ '" 8 ~ ?; ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ ~ ,- ~ f: g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ; g ~ ~ g ~ & f2 ~ ! -6..n ""..,; 0.-1 '-:.0 c-~.-~...,..,f.n v;,' ..,., 00 6 6.---.....1,..:".::.~...;,... -i "",0: cO ~ i ];~~~=~~ g~gr':~.g ~:~~~~~-~~~~~~~~ ~~~d ~~~~~~ci~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~- ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on 0"" 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 'n 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 ~ i :; "" .... ..., ..., .... <A "" ..., g ...~ "" ,.., ~l .... IA "" q .... "" ~. .... .... .... .... g. .... i"'l a:. ~ ~ ~ .... "" n on "T ."...., '" r-. -00- ~'" _ ~'" ~ c-, "" M~ ~~ ~oo ............~............ ....~....~~ Q.... .... . ci...; .... .... .. '" ~ ~ ~ g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ""00 ~o r,,,, "'0 ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~U - ~ ~ ........ ...; "" .... fA:;r ~ ~ oooo__o~o~~r,~oo.o~o.....-.ooowor'ooO~ i ~""""""""""~""p~~~~""~""~"":~"'''''''''''''~''''~''''''''''''~ ....~.... r~ ~,..r"'" 00 ~ ~0~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ .", ~: 6 .... ~;;;; ~ ~ ~ C - ~:;f ....;;;::.r .... ~ ~ ~ %~g~~~~"'~~~~ ~~Mg~~g~~:g~~~~~~~g ~ ~ .... ....~oo~~Mr':~ ~~~ ~r~ ~~~ ~ a ~ :~u~....~~ ~~~ ........ ~....~ ~, ~ e;; ~ ;t ~ ~ ~ a~~~~~.~- g~3;~cr' S~~g~~s~a~~~a~....~~ c q _ ~ 0 ~ ~~~ ~ s ~ ~r-~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ :=~; g ........ "".,f"": .... ,- N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Sg&~&~oggo~g~s~g~a~s~ssaa~a~s~~~ ~ ~~~<>Or- :~~~~: q d i ""':i""~....~""r;;;"" ""::i- '" ~ .... ........ ~ "" "" ;;; i:: J; g " a ~ a ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ ~-g g,,_ ~g ifJ ~ a~~ ~il ~ ~~; ~ c~~~_ c2::: ~~ "~o ,_ aJ~'Z::;O~~r:G ~~_ ~~_ ~] t. '" iC 00:: aJ "0"0 :ll d2 _ ~ " 1:J ~ gd2:~~~~~~L_~~f;; ~2<: ~~ ~5 0:: ..o::~",-~~c;;; oo~:ll~ ""g" "E-g ,,<. - ~WOO~~~O::O~~O -g ~o::~~~l~~~~ ~~ ~~~:_, oO"O;~o::~g ,,'-' ~ .~"'O""," ,," g- :;;4 ~~~~~~~__O" ~~~;~E"-:~-"='~_'-_"'~ ~~C[~'" Q"- !E!~~i~i~.~J~."' - --= ~u:.~: ~i~]0::~~330c..~~~~~G~~~:~~]_5~~~~ ~~oaJ~;-"" 0 c~-ocE'~__~~-~~~E'_'~'_o" - . ..... 0 ~ ~ '" ""~ z ~ ,0 :: ,: _2 .'" _ ~ ~ ~" ..., ~o'" S! ~C::::':;-%l.c~0:;;"",.sw","''''"O o"",,,,~~='g h "'~~'" "aJ", "'''' ~~'-'''',?d205,o::~60 J,~-;;o"::'-~E ,..J~ 6_00:::' ~ ~..- '"VlQ:C ~~ <:00,,::0 E:20::0::5_'-']::0::",-,0::]> " - &~gg~:l~G]~ o~~~o_o_~u_ -'-~cccg :~~~~~~ "~&:~ ~!~"~::,~].-z~~,l~,;~,-,i~__~~.,-,.:,~,~,-,~ ~ ~ ~ -=: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~. '-' - ~ ~- - ~- ~ :: u. , ~ '5 E 0 " "g ~ 5 ; ;;; ~ E E ;;; 3 i:i '5 ~ ~~:."'~~~ ~ ~ 1;: :,.; ~ I. 2 ~ t: ] ] ~ ~ ~ g gl ~" '-' ,,*: ~ Q ~ ~ _ 8 :2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o.g' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ].1] ~ g ~ ~ ] ~] ~ xO::O::~~O::O::ooO::~~~2~~~ ~ ~~u~_~~~Vlo:: ~~~~~~~~~~~Q~,,-'G;;;2~ _ _ -Q-~ ~~'-'~ ~bGG ~~~~~~o'Vl_l~}li~~~g~~~ j,..J j ~~_~~_~o::~,_~j~~~~~u M~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~"'~~~~~~~~~_~~~ ~<<<<<<~ <~~~~zz~~<~~~~~~ ~~~~< c, -~ "" 0::> "";:':; ~ C"- C"- C c- C" _ _ r,_ '" ~ ;:!: ~ ~ ;:-~'l: ~ a c- ~ _ "" "'''''''''''0-0 "'l":!:!____D-i?,;- :;"'"~"'"~~~-r"'" ,e- ~ 00 :;;:;;:;;:;; ;::"''''''' 0"'" o ~g~ c, ~ "'":$::g_fit-~ "'" -oC ..c 0 ~ '" "'" n "'l" :;:;"'"~~~:; "*':;; . 0 ~ 0_ ~ Q :' ~ b~ c~ .2 O~ u" .~ ~ = "- 0;:0 u " " ~ u . ]" C o jj ~ c e ~ 00 u 8- O! ~ , '" o " ;, . o -6 <.SO E r-> ~8 o " ~;2 " a ~~ . 0 ~] =..:::: .5 .~ ~ .~ ~2 @"] o . : ~ ~;; ti ~~ " " ~ ~ , 0 ~ ~ 5~ ~ " ,~ ~ 'u ~ -< "'00 .~ g (5 t; i!-@ i~ ~ i~ C . " r-> = 3j VJ 0; ~o _Z <l:(J)~ 000l ~O~ .N~ o ,0 ZOO ~"- E c~ ..mcow -::>0) ro~ro ".00.. e'" ",LL Ol <0: J!l (J " '0' .t c: o 'iij c: .. c. " W :>. E " o U ~ .. .....: c..i8 ~I -gE >- .. ~ Cl o ~ 0- '" ~ o :: M ~ o N 88M;~:8~~6g~g8gg~88gg8S ]~~~~~~~~E~~~~~~~~~~~~g~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~-~~~-~--~---~ ~~ ~ ;~~~&~~&~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ f'l 0 ::> :=>:=> "" ::! ~ ~ 2~ N ~ ~ "" 0 ..., _, ...., '" N ..., M - ~ ~ =a~sg~N~a~~8aaaaaaa_aaa~ :> q 00, "'l-.... ::> ~ g a :; Sf ~ :: <",l - ...,..., III <:> .... E "" E ~ =aaa~_~aaa~~aaaaaaaaaaa~ M 0..,.., V) 0'\ CI' S g ~~;: ,~ <:> ........ I'" N ~ =~a~aaa~a~~oagaa_aa~a88~ ;; v~ -: q ~. "; q '1- M ~oo 00 0 "'00 ~ ~ ~ 8, a~~ ::> .-, '.0 Q E ....... -~ iig~aaaaS~~$;ggaa~ '" vl "";N ,...: c.o 0-' Ci5 r- .0 "'.-, - 0'-0 "'1"'7 _co ="" -- N ~ ~ gg;g:agaa~ 6-iN 0 0 .0 0 .". ""...,-"" "" ..., -..... ~ ~ ~S$~~~a8~a~8""'aa~~~ aaas~ ::> q~_~ q.o ~~. <",l .. ~ ~ N ~ 5"' g~~ ~ 3~ = ~ - ~ 0 ~__ _ N ::> ~ - ~_ ..., vA sf ~ ; :::::: , ~ ro <Xl o o N >- U. >- a c u. o ~ " e ~ " " , " 'r. ." ~ C' ~ $ 3 ~~~ J ; ~ ~ ], ~~~~ ~": ~ ~ E] '"" 0 '" 0 r-~~;~ i ~ j )::;:::S-€.f; ~ ~ ~:; E ~ ~c a~~ ~_ ~ ~"fC'''' E ~ 'c .eO 1 ;s- ~ .. .., "1 ~ ~ ~. ~ as U) ~ ~ ;llllli!!I:!I!,i!:!I!i ::t 3 c:J,.;:. "0 -= :;: '- ~ c.: ;> -::> ~ _ ~ =32~888~~I~~.~2a~8~,~~Eg~ ~~~~~;~~~~~~~~;~;~~-e~ I f ~c_ " o_~ '" ~ I g " ~ v ~ ;:; ~ "'..> " "''' ;;>" :l .] ;:; ~~ :;~ ~ ",~2 22 _ .~.' ... ~,. '" }, ~_5 ~= e Q !: U _ 'lJ ~ E c " E -g; u ~~2'lJ~88~~ i~'lJjei~o U",::> . ..... 'lJ ~ '" " '" _ _I~ _ _ _ it: Cl.2 ~e;~~;~~~~ ~3~~w~8;~e~ _~~I~~j~~~~~I~_~I~~~~~~ 1:e"1::-::>",=::g~::J~ ::J21;:-o1:"Q-o[':E:Cl c.......<~ <:( <-=Q.I-_~ ~ c...<<=- c...<_I-:... ~'N ~f~~ ~ rl~___N_ _ _ ~ C~~~N~~~ N~OOZ~~N= .~~i~~~~~~~88N8~~~~~~~~~' ~~~ ~O~r' ~~ ~~ ~r' ~~~ ~~oo~o~ooo _ NNNr, eo.. N......". -t.."....,..,........,............,..,........,. ;; I'i?-S 02 ':;;r/J '-' u t: ~ -~ = ~ 0,", '-' 8 g ~ ..9 ~ ~ " ~ ~ Co ~ ~ t o [j- '" ~ 3 g i -6 < ~ i'i g ~ 0 _? '" ':;:;;1 -t ~ o " 3 ~ :;l] 'i1..::; 5 ; ~ .~ " 0 x - ~] [: :J - " H ~- " " '; ~ ~ " 5,il :;: " ~" '0 ~ ;;: " .~ ~ c :;:; i!-@ .$E 0:; t u :-=8 u .s 8 2 @.5 Vlij :::Z <l:Q)~ 00'" ,:;;.,~: ,0 ,~ -", C >......... i!lro<D ::>0> ~-D~ c '" ",LL 0> <l: '2f: ,0 -:. OO~I,C Q) :: :: :: > 0 0 0 ClI M "" ..,. ... 0, 0, 0, I- Q) - ClI - tIl ... t- "" "- Q) ..,. ..,. "- - M 00 t- "- .5 00 "" " ",' '" - ..,. - Cl t- o -, '" c: '" "" ;:::; " 0, ..,. '" "'C 00, "! '" ... N '" ::s 0, 00 0, '" (j '" '" ..,., '" >< N W I t-- 0, "" ~ Ol >> t- o t- o "" 0 00 U u "" ",' .,.; " c: ..,. ..,. '" '" ~ Q) "" 0, "" '" "(3 .,.; "" '" ~ ..c M t-- '" ClI := "" 0 M '" '" 0,' M ...; I- W ~ '" M "" ..., ...., Q) ::s u. - ~ > Q) .. .!:! .. 0 t-- 00 '" f-< t- O '" - ... '" t-- "". '" .c: Q M '" .... ~ "" '" 0 '" '" -i '" ;; " ... t-- ::; ... 0 '" '" - N N '" ..; 0 '" '" N ..., '" '" ..,., ...., :iE - N Q) Cl ClI ... Q) ~ ~ ~ , ~ = ~ S <l = = :3 Os ... '8 ~ '0 ~ = ~ = " ~ .s ~ fJJ .!! -;; " '8 .. = ~ ::= OIl OIl OIl ~ '" ..,. '" ..,. 0, r-' -;; '" <> - ~ '" N Q N - f-< N 0 '" "- 0, '" "> ..,. 0 ... " 00 " :! ;'S 00 00 - 0' " 0, "" ... t- '" N 0 ",' N 00 '" - 00 "" '" 0, 00 ... t- '" - ",,' N ~ '" 0, 'C 0" - ..., t-- ~, "'" N '" t- o, t-- ..., ~ ",,' ..,.' 0 ",' = '" Q :; 'll " a ::1,' ~ 0 N 0, ...., = 0 0, "" '" Q 0, "" "" '" u 00 '" ~; " - '" 00 0, '" ~ '" 0" '" = ... 00 M '" '" "" .0 '" 00 N N, 0 '" r-' t- o " t-- "> - ~ = .s -;; " -;; .. :ii -;; = .~ -;; = ;; .. .. ~ .. -= .. -= .. ~ .. .. < ;:> ;:> .. .. .. -;; .. -;; ~ ~ ~ ~ -= '0 ~ 25 25 25 Q f-< f-< '"' '"' " -0 ~ ~ U5 0 u ~ ~ -;; ~ -0 -0 0. ::J U u u "" 13 .. 0. 6 - " ."1 -;; t:: 0 0. ~ " ::: f-- ;i; > " ~ f- >' .~ \l u co .,; '" '" '" ~ ~ 0 - c; u s " ~ '" d' ,9 l' :E ti 'S ~ '= '<> = 0 ::;i 0 '" ";' " " . " ~ '" '" '0 r " ~ " 'TI " '" '0 " " "" . d' ^ ,2 ~ 0 ~ :2 .Ei 0 0. - 0 '" ~ '0 .- " , u e: 'TI () -;; > ,,- ~ ~ CII co 0 f- a \j :c ~ " ~ E " III -<: ~ ~ I- ;j 3 00 0. is CII ~ " CII u 0 '" " 0 u rn ,~ N v; '" Qj 0 ~ ;j " ~ > ~ .<> U 6 " ~ '- ;; ~ ::s -0 u 0 " co 0 ;;, f:; ~ co rn Cl <{Q)~ 00," ~O~ .N~ o ,0 ZON ~'" E >-~ 2mQ) -::>01 <1l~<1l u..oD- eQ) Q)LL OJ <( I CIl - CIl CI -C Q) - CIl;: a;Q) e:::a. >. -c.- C Q) CIl_ C/).~ Q).s::: ::Q) :iE> OC-C .,..-c , -c CIl () .!!! 1:- Q) Q) 0 :c>Cl CIl [:! Q) .-.-- CIl ~() C>. CIl CIl 1ij := .- .s::: ClCl Q)J: .~ >. .s:::lll Q) > CIl ::l C C <( 'i"," <I'l ::E i:l:lol ... ..;Io-l ..;II-=:, ~oa ;"':: .~... <,.." c~~~ zC:~_rn ;;J~lol!(iIl: , ~1:Il c.:o ~ II I:.:!... === ;> UlO!':I<':!;::i!1- ;. -l;;;'1~o ,:,.:.}:.~) ~ :~:~,.~_~o : ~ '" .,' =.> ar::';,:;.:', ,..l d .' fI'l ~,~;c;- 1<_ Z~Q,~i:3 ",', Iol<Z =... ,- ~:t.J,< lol;.l "-, ~j ;: S ,v,; ,.j,"'" O.,j. ~ 7,' h u >C,",'" g' r-:'''' ~ ~ . ~ ~,;- ~ ~.,.. ~~ .- ~; tIllill;' Ill;;", ::: Q'" .~ !!:::.> .= "0 -~ "~ ,- ~i5 -, "~ i~ ;<l:,,' ~= . "" - ~ ffi , - < " < < < -~ ~~=: IIll..!.O::c: _H..;Eu I:.:l..J=;;J ~~_o ~ ". = ~ '.," ~ f2 ~'- ;:;j!::! .:'.' 0 ~ = . ~~ I . I g~ -- ou ::;b . " ~~ z. I ~ < ~u .' ~, I I,' ::i! . ~ " ' i ~ ~ ~~~~lli~~~~~~~~~wg~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~q. .~~oqq .~~ qq~~~~w~ ~WrnW~m~N~OmW~~.m~ NN~~OW ~~MmM~MM~~.~~~~~~N MmMm NN M MOO.. -wmmommw mmm~ ~~ ~~~~~ci~ ~~~. ~ ~ .... ~ ~~~~~~~~M~re~~~~~~~g~~~~~9~~~ ~M:~~~qw~~~~~~q~q~~~o~~~,_,,_, _ ~MmNroommOwNNNMNm~~WMN""m~~ ~~ M N~~M~ W~~~~~~NN~~m~ WO::> ....-,.: MM ~~~b~~~~~8~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~d6 m.M -.W mM _~o w~""m~~w ~~~~NN ig~~~~~~g~~~~:;~~i ~i:~ NN M Mmm~. -.~~""""~m ~~WN ..-"...: - "NN-,s;-,.; .-.-:4~ NN W"-WO.NWOM.~~"-w~omMOW~M.om N ~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~og~~~~~~ MM~~~~MMmmmomciN~m~~mN~~<<iNM ~.NN"-~~~NNNM~W~~WqWW.~q~~"- NN " , NN .N~~.O."" WwN....m~W....o . WW~OWNM ~....~~~~~mg~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~w ":":MM~~~~ciciM~MNci<<im~NNow~~~""': ..-~ ~MM MM..~"".m ~.....o wM ~~ .0.0 m-o> OMWW.MON....OWOMOM~~mWo....~m~N.... M W.....~.wM MN....m ~....M~Nm.N~~ ~ ~m~.m~w..oo.oo....~mmm~~oww -o~~~,.:N"...:.oomm.omm~~.ooci,.:~~oi ~~~~~~M~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~g~~ ""':m" cri ~"~ ci<<i mm W~ WW M....~.....ONO oM.omMmm~N~Mw~~N 2~~~....~~~~~g~~M~~~~~~~~N~~~WW MM""': NNMM.ow ":<<io::l~":":o NO ...N mm ~~~~~~~~~o~~~~o~~~~~~~ .MW.W~""M~N ~w.. ~W""N ""...: . -~~NNcrin":wNow": criri < N ~ ON <Ow ~~~g m. Om ~~ M~~M~~R~~~~~O.""N~~N~~~~W~~ M ....MWOW~M~w.ONw.mo.~wMw~~~ NNwowO~M":wm~":criNo::loi<<iNN~mN~ NNO~O M.ww....m.w~omw~ ~m~ ~NNNN~~NNIDW W....M~ wwm~ ..- ':4~ NN ~r:: ~ ~ "' ~ ~ c 0 ~ 0 ~ Q "0 c " 0 " 0 0 1 - . "' 0 ~ E_ o I u , 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ j! "' '5 , . c . c " ~~ ~ ~ 0 . " 0 2 o " 8 . - c 15 iE ~ . " o 5 " " o~ . ~ '5 c . E 0 ~ m ~~ ~ ~ "' . . E ~ E ~ . t I 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 _ m ~ ~~ < ~ ~ '5 ~ . <Ili: c ~; 15 c . ~ ~ . 0 m 0 0 i c Ji c " ~ ~ . '5 " 0 " ~ > 0 ~ 0 .0 m 2 ~g ~ 5 E ~ .. Q; E . 0 6 6 g 0 15 0 . . . E 0 > . ~ ~ ~ , , , Z < " " - ~ < > ~~~~~2~~~~~2~2~2~2~2~2~~~2~2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;:: 0' ro , . 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! <Il c ~ ~ ~ 0 <Il gal to ~ ~ ~ ! o c 0 ~~ ~ i;.! ~ ~ ~ .;, ~ i> l! :~ ; ~ ~i ~~ ~o~ ~~~ ~ i3 ::: ~ ro: >--- 5 11. ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~o~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~ 8~g~ ~! 5 W2~., .'!l ., ;2 ~ 1': -"5 ~ ~~~~ ~.!B ~~ ~~~ to ij~ ~r ~~~~ - :is:= "" >- I:' ~.~E ~~ '~j~~1 ~~~ ~~ ~0~o ~~: ~~ rI~; <Il.o<l)" <Il Q. iH HHI!! f~~ 1:~~~~a<ll ow~ g~~,8@Bo !~! ~!~~io~ t~~ ~~ - ~~~ - ., ~",~,'~o::O<l) ~ ~ >_ '-' _ "" 0 ::J ~"' g~~>';,"> ~ :~ ~ - :. '" ~~gNiif~~i~ git~i -'~-<(",5 e.>l~>-Q._>s:~to H~j~!~HH O~Ue.>2~.g.g~~~ -C: t( ~ "'" e.> '" i!' ~ ~I~f~~~j,tii 1?~t5WBf7~.~~~l! ~~];:Q,~:;'""~B8~ ~~~~~~~!~~i "SISl5~~.~2~'5" >--- <I) >--- W 0 ()) >--- > >--- 8. -N . ~ ~~ . - gj~ ------- "'''''....''''''....a> ~.s 3 .a O(/) U" ~ - .~ ~ == Q, 0;:0 U " " 0.- 13 '" Q, Jj " ,:2 <;; t o Q, ~ " '" ~ f-< - - o oj ..s '" " <;; 'u 0 ~ ~ ~ "l 00 ~ " 0 > 0 N 0 ~ " " .0 -; 8 "" " ,8 u " f-< Q Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 173 of 191 APPENDIX D Ad Valorem Credit Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 174 of 191 This Appendix presents the calculations used to detennine the credit due to ad valorem tax revenues being used to fund capacity expansion projects. The following sections provide an explanation of credit calculations. Residential Land Uses In determining the ad valorem credit for residential land uses, the study evaluated the 2007 single family home sales and determined the market value of a new home. This process involved some adjustments to the size and unit price of homes to account for outlying values. More specifically, the following adjustments were made: . Home sales data from Collier County Property Appraiser parcel database for 2007 indicated that the average home size in Collier County is 4,067 square feet. The home sales data also reflected that the average cost per square foot was $168.84 for this !,'TOUp of homes. The multiplication of the average size by the average price resulted in an average market price of approximately $686,615 for a home 2,500 sf or greater. . Since the average size of the homes for the sales data was more representative of larger homes, the relationship between taxable values of existing homes for less than 1,500 square feet, 1,500 - 2, 4999 square feet, and greater than 2,500 square feet was used to develop a stratified credit per square foot. This approach was used to be consistent with the tiered single family residential land use. The cost per square foot that resulted from this analysis is the less than 1,500 square foot category is estimated at $104.68 (62 percent of the $168.84), 1,500 - 2, 4999 square foot category is estimated at $118.19 (70 percent of the $168.84). It should be noted that the ad valorem revenues used toward transportation capital projects is a fixed amount and not a percentage of the County's ad valorem revenues. As presented previously, over the next five years and beyond, this amount will be limited to approximately $6.0 million per year. Table D-] presents the projected ad valorem contributions of a new home (2,500 sf or greater) over a 25-year period, beginning with the 2008 market price of $686,615. Given that the dollar amount that goes to transportation projects is not going to increase, the portion of the ad valorem taxes paid by a new home that are used for transportation capacity projects will be declining. Under the homestead exemption rule, the annual increase of the taxable value ofa home is limited to three percent until it is sold. The percent decrease in the annual tax pa}1nellts of a new home is calculated as the difference between the home value increase (3 percent) and the overall taxable property value increase (14 percent). The resulting I-mil taxes are brought to Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 D-l Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Aaenda Item No. 10A ~ February 10, 2009 Page 175 of 191 present value based on an interest rate of 4.5 percent, which is consistent with the interest rate at which the County currently borrows. Table D-l also provides the portion of the 1- mil collections that would be used toward transportation capital expansion projects and the total credit per square fool. Table 0-1 1-MiI Credit Calculation for Single Family Home land Use (Based on Market Value) Revenues generated from j.mil(l) Annual ad valorem revenue that goes to transponalion capacity(2) Average home price(3) Annual increase in countywide taxahle values(4) Annual allowed increase in taxable home values(5) Net increase(6) $82,791,002 $5,985,800 $686,615 14% 3% 11% Percentage of Millage Used for Transportation Capacity Addition Projects(7) 7% Value Value tlsed Ad Valorem Present Year Taxable Market for Credit I-Mil Tax(8) for Transportation(9 Value(lO) 2008 $686,615 $686,61 j $686.615 $687 $48 $46 7009 $43 $40 2010 $39 $34 2011 $35 $29 2012 $32 $25 20]3 $28 $22 2014 $/6 $]9 2015 $21 $16 2016 $2] $14 2017 $]9 $12 2018 $17 $10 2019 $15 $9 2020 $]4 $8 2021 $]2 $7 2022 $11 $6 2023 $10 $5 2024 $9 $4 2025 $8 $4 2026 $7 $3 2027 $7 $3 2028 $6 $2 2029 $5 $2 2030 $5 $2 2031 $4 $2 2032 $4 $] 2033 M. $1 $452 $326 Sauare footag:e(ll) 4,067 Credit ocr square foot $0.08 Interest Rate(l2j 4_5% Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 D-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 176 of 191 (1) Source: Collier County Transportation Planning Department (2) Source: TableC-4, Item (e) divided by 5 (3) The 2008 taxable value is determined as explained on page D-] of this rcport. (4) Average increase in total taxable values between 1999 and 2008 in Collier County (5) PLllnitted rate of annual increase in taxable value of homes under the homestead exemption rule (6) Annual increase in cnuntyv.'ide taxable value (Item 4) less annual allowed increase in taxable home values (Item 5) (7) Annual ad valorem revenue (Item 2) divided by the revenues generated from] -mil (Item 1) (8) Average home value (Item 3) divided by 1,000 (9) 1 ~mil tax (Item 8) multiplied hy the percentage dedicated to transportation capital additions (Item 7). This amount is reduced by 11 percent (Item 6) annually to account for the fact that the portion that is used toward transportation capacity expansion projects will be decreasing. (10) Present value of the ad valort.'Tll for transportation (Item 9) based on an annual interest rate of 5 percent (Item 11) (11 ) Average size of a home based on 2007 sales (12) Consistent with the interest rate for the 2005 Gas Tax Revenue Bonds Non-ResIdential Land lises Table F-2 provides an explanation of how the ad valorem credit was calculated for non- residential land uses. It should be noted that the I-mil credit calculations for these land uses represent broad estimates based on recent sales in Collier County as available, and the Consultant's experience in other jurisdictions and knowledge of the industry. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 D-3 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study <{a>~ 000'> _o~ "'- , 0 'r- E :;:,::: .ffiro(J) :00> ~..o~ cO) Q)LL. OJ <{ III " III ::> '0 c: .. ..J 'iii '" c: " '0 'u; " 0: ~ ~ c 0 "z :s 0 ..- >-c: o :; :; u 'iii U - 'C " ~ u < = Iii Iii ;" i ] ] <'>i\~;~', r~.' g g 5 :';__:_L",-J:< ~ ~ ~ "i:';:::"-::':;),:: :::::2 ] ,M ii, , -;; ~ ~ -:,' , l;> '0,.:, O~] ~] ~] .' ~ :::> ,., 0 II) ":= o:l on a 0 ~ -. " ::l '<t;:i,....:::I >,' '0 ~'o ifJ'Q g 'I, ,~ R ~ g ~ g ':/W.:::' "': ~ g ~ ~ . ~ ~ ," ~~~~~~ ~:;;: o:l Q.I t'<l g o:l U ;~.::, i" '_::~ '" ~ ~ ~ ""i @ ~F: I,"" ~ - a:l ;.. lG ;.. ::::~}<?j;'h'~' .1 ~ -~ ~.~ ~ :\<~y~:-- WJ o:l ~ ~ al ~ '-'Y,',' ="- ~ :a ::: t!.... - t ;;; -- !l u f ~<:- -:',,; U " ~ ~ ~ , - h"o-; " 01 = = = -< .',.' 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ .. :c ~ = :: = "i ... ;;.., o o o '" rO o 8 <r: ~ - 'i3 => ~ ~ ~ ~ - -i3 => a o 2 = 3 2 , ." " = ..J -0 '5 '" " U '" ..J '" ... - " z 13 '" o "' :;; " ~ 3 "' " Sj s ~ - - ~, ~ o " o ~ ~ ''0 ~~ ~ ti ;; ;.. ;:; ~ . " . = 0 = ~~~ = ~ 0 ~ ~ [q ~~~ o .0 ;~~ . ~ ~~~ ,~ ~ 1l 1)-0 'i;:j '~~._~d <U o:l ~, '5 ~ -:~ ~ -0 ~ t; ..r:: ~ '" o:l ~ "" @ g 11 ~ =: '" 0 Ii :" -;; ~ g c..':::- 0 .a 6 g ~"2 ~~~ g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ r' ~ 81 o ~: ,.. ~ o o o ~" ~ = " 2 " '," z o 8 -oeJ ~~ ~ " 0- > " c ~ ~ ~ " o o o '" " 0 . ~ ~ 8 ;; _ o:l ~. ~ ~ ]: ~ ill ~ C ~ ~ ~ c II) ~ o " oi ~ a b i'in -0 "" ::: '" .... ;:J 0 .~ ~G ~ Q;:j :g ~ uo:;- ~ > 0 c5 ~ :: .g- ~ S :.....1'--0 >. . 11 e) ~ .~ c < 0 o ~ l5.. ~ 0- . " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c o ".; ~ ~ € " ~ " "5 " :01 o ~ ~ ~ " 0. "- 1A 1A c " " OJJ"O~ .~ ~ ~ <l.l:-;;: ~ " ~ '0 ~ ~ " = = 0 0 t'd"O:n ~ ~ ~ ; .2 03 .~ ~ ~ :.w~,-, c c ~ ri ~ ~ ~ 00, r- ('-1,:.:.:. ~ ~~;:'"" " " ri ~ ~ 00 c, - ~~ o c o '" o o ('I " ~ g gh; g .n:=l ~ ~::J Lr. ~~ ~ => r, ~ " ~ " 3 " I I " '0 ~ ~ o o o '" ~ ~ " ] ~ " ~ .~ ~ " ~ " "- ~ ~ ~ 0- ~.E " '0 0..8 " u o~ ~ >> ~ E " " ~ 0 o u E~ ~8 c c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~" Vli>"lVl 00 00 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ u ] 00 I 5 ~H ~ B a; ~ 01"0 -:-0 iil~" .g ~ ~ ~ o c: d " -. Z <l.l~O "2;,gi: ..c:3:::J f-~.. 'l.l ~ !: .~ := rn ~8~ o c ~ ~ ,,< :;J:z I I "' " = " " " -5 g ~ ~ 0 t::S E- o " ';;/) ~ ':Jl-- ~ ~ ~ .B __ _ "" _ o:l <1.> 0 Q;;.. (<i v Wi:: ....c.... :;)... ";: 0 -- -- e;.";:: ~ <::: ::l ';:: ::I C ;'i ~ a:;; ~ I!.l -B .~,] .~'] V1 U ~ a; ~ ""2 Iu -~ ~ ~ ~ ..: ::c :::J ,0.> ;:) r: u U 0- ;;; ~ > -0 ;: ~ 0- ]0 c-5 . ~ E " " - = ~ QJ := '"" ~ s: ~ o ~ ~ " ~ o o o ~ ~ o '0 ~ o ~ ~, " . 0 ~"- ~ ~ " 0. ~.E " '0 <Ii -= ~ CJ OIl '-' ~ "E (I') ;:s € t: 6 :;l ~ ~~, 8 .~ ~ . '0 :::; ~"O ;.,.E u <'0 G .B s: ~ :5 3 ,-= - E i >: {l.2 ~ ~ '" u " ~ ~ t.~ ~ g ~ "5~o :; It> C c;rc; ~ 0<( ;;;;z ,,< 'FIz o g<( ~z ~ ~ . o c ~ ~~ 00 'c ~ ~ ~ g .. > " -5 ,; " '0 ~ " !S. ~ ~- " 0 g,<2 2 ~ 0- " ~ g ~ g , c " 0 "; M ~~ . " o '0 o " ;; "0 ~ ] ~.~ Vie:: OJ ~ ~ c " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c '" ~ ~ o c c '" o ~ ~ E " '0 o " ';;; c c c, " E u U " a u ;; o ~ c '" ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 52 0"' U u H- od u ~ "- ~ ]' = ,5 ~ ~ . f- ~ o .s o ~ ~ '0 a .;; "00 .~ ~ I~.. c; ~ -g ~ FCl <l:"'~ OClOl ~Cl~ .N_ o ,0 ZOro ~r-- E >.~ 2cuQ.l -::lOJ '" ~ ell ",.oil. ~<ll (jjLL OJ <l: .. " .. ~ " c .. ..J ~ E -" 'tl:E " .. " " c~ ~C: Co 8z -~ NO 6~ " 0 :0'- ...!!l I- " CJ iij U 't,;: '\, '.'; , ., " ,~:~i : ,". " .. "'1~; ;.. , ~- ~:a ...... -; t 13 'S. u t ~ u '. .- -;:- ;; ,/ , ~ I - 'ti " ~ U fil..... :;; .. .. ~ - lo( .a Oc ~ ;: ~ '. ~ ~ ] ,""" 1- ~ ~ ~ " ; .. '. , .:; ... z Si I- :> l- E: ~ u ~ .. '" I- ~ ~ .=: '0 ~c8 o 0 t: ~ ~~ ~ " u t; ~ ~ " ~, ~~ _N "~ ~ '-; ':,. ~ g grn g ~ - t -0 ;; " .~ C5 u" gp a ti '? > " <OJ ;:; ; ~ " = "~ oa :::", E 21;' <;:; ::: I:..L; (;:i f- iij .. a -< - - " " ~ ~] ~ C 3 t: g ~ ~ 'n ~a 2'0 " 0 o S ~ .5 :::; ~ o ~ ;; Z "'@ .E :':l "- ~ u 5 o 0 ~u " " o ~ _a Ou ~ ~ ~ ;1:, ;:;; ;1:, ;-;; ;:t, ::A 1"1 ('-I n n "I 1"1 ,....) V'l VI Vl VI If, VI IA c, ~ 0'-0'C'C'0"c:J'C' Vi;:;;;;;:;;;;:;:;;;;;"" o o ~, ..: N ~ gg ;i~ ,,-j rl VlVl ~c ~ ;:~;ci ('_I ('-)('1 ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ '" '" v. ~~~ o ~ '" '10 3 :s o~ o a ! .;:: ~ 0; -~ 2~ :Ii;.... "' 20 ~ :=:- 2 5 .:2 ~ g , 0_0 </", - g, 3~ 5 cr, .:= ~-~~ c g __ r;I '" ';=;"" ~ ~I ~ u ~ ~.1::~ ..:..: ~ '"",,,-, is ~ ~]~H~B~ ",5_, ~ 5 :::; "B 'i!j u _ u ,~ ::.J :;:::: ::D o N ~ 0:::::0=:0;::;;2 r ,,, r::;::::i='" '" <;:; Vi '" o ~ g~ o ~ 5. '3 C ,0 .2 2 " :':l ;:; I ~ ~ I g ~ S ~ fi '. ~ ~~ ~ :J) ~ ::::l ~ ~ - 1A ~,,:2 ::l .~ r;I "g i7f ~ 3 o 0 "Q"g i2~ "g " "' ] ~ ~ 56 :g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I; ~ " " " ~ 0 -" ;; ~ g o ;;:;: g .0 - ~ Co = ~ s:[;t 2'0 " " ~ ,~ " -, = " .; fa ~ "3 ..2 a '" ;.>-, " 5 o 0 ~v ";;; ~ tl C "''-' - -- ~~oooo .....1 N,-.I r, N N OCOOOOOCOO;Y.l '-' '-' w '-' U'::"'- ~::;J::;J~;::;::: -=-=-"""-=-'d=- ~ 1;:t 1;:t ~ 1;:t 1il ;:l ;:l ;:l ;:l ;:l ;:l ]]]]]] ;j ;; 0; Ii u i:i "'"'"' .9 _ oS .9 _ _ " " " 13ZZ e e e ~ ~I ~ is is 3 UVU ;:; ';j 0; ~~~ 0.> U 1.) ~~ij R: BJ ~ 1",::::1 ~ 2C0 OC:oooc==OOOO:ooococ-ocooooocoo "I "--I "'1 ") 1"'1 "I ,,~ 1"'1 "-I N 1"'1 "I "I ,,~ ,,~ 1"'1 "-I 1"'1 1"'1 "-I 1"'1 1"'1 "-j "_I ".1 N "I ,,~ N ".J \A<Ab'lV>V>!AVlVlV,\A!>"7!A\A!>"7\A ~~~~~::~;;~;;~~~~ 85 00 ~:-~ n "I ;A <A - - - :;,.::; 0 _ 0 oooc 0 ~o~ooo - v-, '" v-, v-, '" 'r, ;;:-, "oj I"'I"-j r-! "-I "-I "-I V>\Air)b'}VlV;\A " " '-;;;12 :::: ^ - 0 0 000 "=>.0_ " o 10 ;:; '" " 0 ",0 ~=~o ;;: ~;:r, V') ~ ~ ;; ::Z:tr:.3 ~ "" <'l <':l '" -;; t;; ~ '~I~ o~g g ~ ~:=-; , , ;;15; " . :-51-=- -;; v. " .Ico 0.> v. -0 ::: g c'" ~ 0, 0 =: - "i 55 qf-;; 1'~ o 0- ="- c v-. x _ :5 _ 00 c:::>o - "-I -.:t ~ ~;:!~~Q~Q~ o c:::> 00 0 .::; 0 -0 ceoo tr"r, tr,tr, '" N "-I "-I !A1A\A'" OJ ,_I;; ^ ~ v. 0 t! 8. S'~ ~ ~ ~~~;Q~ 0-,0:::> 00:::>0 0000 :? ~ ~sC "-j "'1",1"'1 V;\A\AVl v> ~ ~ ~ ;5,:::>..=., ~3,~ S " " E -g o " Vl 6 .:: g f-[/J 5 o -5 :::: .~ ~ ~ ~ o = <':l u:; 0:1 -:.J ~ :€ . ;: v; ~ " 0 ~ ~ ~ l;) v: ;:; ;j:l) ~ ~~~5 a ~ u ~_ c~ ;; 5 - ~ '" ~ c~~~v'E -=c~c:a~ ~~ 0000 ss "-j N 0000 ~~ - ~ =-=- ~ 1;:t o 0 ;2"'@ i!2 a ';j ~~ ~ :3 " " :g:g <':l ~ g-g- 2~ 0000 N " NN ~~ 0000 ~~ 00 :::;~ ~'" uu Vi'(;; g~ ~ c, _ 0 00 ~ 0000 1.0>-' 1'5 ] C~ '-' " ~ - . . -.='& ::;~ ~ ~ "' u . ~ .5 c e jj o B" E c- "' o I~ ~ " . g . "" "'00 : ~ g \._ N '0 ... I 0 ~ l:tl H .= '-> c-O :3~cr; ,~~: ,0 )en -r-- E >-~ ~CUQ.l ::00> ~.o& ~Q) iijl!.. OJ <( <II " <II :J " c: '" -' ;;; '" c: =C:E " <II ::I " c:ll:: :;:Ie c: 0 8z -~ NO 6~ " 0 :0;; "'.!!! >-::1 " ;;; u - ii i!! u :j: ~ .n, ,. .' ,:",. }, . ':" . "l~ r; .' " , :~~,. I ,. :}~, I '.l1;\: I. J'., "I;t:' ~:~~I!,;, ~':s ~ :at L> ~ Q"U ,"" " -- :;; ~ ~ u =-- ~ , - -; = ~ ~ I:'~ ~ ~ :c = = ~= .- ~ - = ~ -:.",? - 'c :J I U :J ..r '" b I c ".; ~ ~ " o o 0, .~ ~ , " " ~ .=: ~ <~ E-:;: '" " :t:c!!l ;: " o ~ ~ . D 0; '" " :; , g 1l. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o " , ca ,,; > ';I " ~ ~ t t .;a ;; [ " ~ ~'" " " ;; ~ .~ g. :.uQ::; ~ ~ N ~ 'D N - '" c ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ o g~ ,,; v is .~ ;; ~ .;: " '" ~, ~ li u ~ g E'] ] g. E <U 6: ~ D ,. " ] ~~ .. , . ~ 8 .~ , ~ g~ ~ c &u - " ~..:= ~E 'o~ :gil -; .=: > . ~1l . 0 ~ .2 . - ~ E \:l S - " .~ .~ t.U~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ C;' ~ '(; 0 '0 E ~g 3 . S ~ " ~ . ..;3 ,; ';I,. ~;; 5'-"1 ~2; f- " - " ~ " c.:::: '<Ii ><: ::J 0 , g ~ . .2 ~ ~ ~ " ~ -~ :g " , .~ 0 ~ ~ 5:;;; < fi, = o ~ ~ . D O'l R] 2~i ~ i(l E , . " ~o:g d:: 2 i(l ___1: " ~ ~ -= o g "r Cl.... ';I Vi g.~ _0 _ .......-,r- lJ ~ IJ.l E'st::~ ~ * g ~ ~.~"B 5 i'0~.g ~ ;;;; ~ o r"1 ~ '" ~ ;; ~ ia 5 ~ " '" .~ "3 6 ~ ~ li u ~ " " o ~ ~ " ~ ~ "" 2 D~ o E' '" 0 ~ 8 o " g~ .... '0 !lu ~.5 ~ E ~ 0 0,.):: "~ o " ~ ~ ~ -8 ~ t c ..g i; -g -<; a E Cl ti .5 u -<; "'i: .~ .~ ~ ~ t.l.l ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; o :;c ~. ~ ;; ~ " ~ " '" '2 g " 0- p " " " f- f' N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ ~ o g lr~ N o ~ ~ ^ g 5 2 F v is ~ " '" ~ o o ~ ^ . u. ~ ~ ~ ~ :; " "" ~ .s " ."" ~, C!. ~ N ~ ^ ~ " - ~o ~2 . u -0 ~ <E & " ^ g, g '];0 ]~ -::c ~ 0 -<; u .~ ~ ^ > '" . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ '" ~ ~ i;' D ~ .;:: ~ ~ " ;; " ~ ^ ::l C -; -; ~ ~ 5 :~ g] o c ~ Q..~::J 1)-~ ~~'o U D o ..0 ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ :; " "" ~ .s " "" ~ C!. ~ N ~ ^ sS' (',j N ~ ~ ::..Iv ::J::J -::!,-::!, ~ " - Q.. 0 1ft. ~ ~2 :::: ;:J ~ ~ -g ~ 2 g.E I2 ~ t ~ 'E ~~~~ ,5 Ci;; u \:l 'c ~ ~ -<; :g!~l ~ 'E 0; ::: 6 :il OJ ~ C ~ ~ (>O~~ e;;:A~ C~ ~ '>oOCOC .....Vj;A ~ N 00 N N ~ o'Xg ;q~~ (>0;;:::' '" <A~:A g 0] '" f;<..... "- ~ .~ g g (: S o. 1;t ~ .12 ;; Vi " ,; ~ . o -Iii :'<I ~ ~ <U '" ~ ~ ~ V :'<I Vl .~ :g ~ ;... ~ < Jj ~ ~ c!. Q ::l OJ '5 ~ Vl<....J ~ :g; ~~< ~-a:Z >.~ 'g] 000 u" ~ - ~i O::J u ~ ~ o f = 9 ~ o " = e f- ~ c\ .El ;~ u ~ .:( "'~ l.~~ ~~ ;2 8 iFQ <l:m~ aom ~o~ .N_ o ,0 ZOO ~'" E >>~ 2mm -"OJ ro~ro 'O-"a. c'" ",LL OJ <l: ~ " ~ . " .. , , ~ il' . . 2 " " . " " " ~ ~ " ~ ~ ;;;; ;;;; -i3 " , ~ " ~ " " ~ ;; .~ .12 Ii Ii .. . . :9 . " ~ 2 " , , .2 ;; " ~ , ] ~ .. g " , .~ , ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ,= ~ '; " 0 " 0 " " , , .. .. " > > " " ~ '0 a c ,~ 2 1j B :~ ~:" " ~~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ " - -; .. ;;;; ;;;; 5 ;; 1$ u "2j ~ ... ~ .. u IT ~ N N 2 ~ ~ ~ Q " ~ 5 ~ ~ 2 ~ '" " '" :l '0 C .. ,J ~ E -" "0:'9 " '" " " CO: +:ic Co 8z -~ '" 0 6~ " 0 :E+:i ..,!!! I- " u .. U ~ ... ~ ~:~ ~ .:t = ~ >~ - 'C " U ::j! ~ II€]' B:Il '-' " " - " . ",'8. 0:0 '-' H ~ " . .@ o ,0 ~ o " o . ,.. ~ 6 c c c v; ~ o 9~] ~ - '" ;:2~ ~~~ ;; a ~ "2 ~5. ~ ~ ~ g..g ~ ~ Hl ~] ~ "='00-0 .E;:; 0 '::;:; - ~ 5 & ~.f' ~ I~H :> ::: ::: .... ..... ::: " <l> ~ ;-:: ::; .- & c ~ 2-gg~ ~ ~ 1:; JH " .s ~ " '0 ~ :;; "'00 ~~ " " ~ " i!-@ ~ ~ .~ 0 is C .. ~ ] :J , o o " C so ~~ Agenda Item No. lOA February 10, 2009 Page 181 of 191 APPENDIX E Single Family Tiering Analysis Agenda Item No, 10A February 10, 2009 Page 182 of 191 TOA has included an update to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family residential (detached) land use to ensure equity by size of home. To facilitate this, an analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing unit size and household travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2005 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine the overall trip-making characteristics of households in the United States. Table E-] presents the existing trip characteristics being utilized in the current adopted impact fee schedule for the Single Family (Detached) subcategory. The 2001 NHTS database was used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual household income levels. In addition, the 2005 AHS database was used to compare median annual familylhousehold incomes with housing unit size. 11 is important to recognize that the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit size from the AHS. The results of the analyses of these two sources are included in Tables E-2 and E-3. First, the data shown in Table E-2 indicate Ulat the median income in the U.S. for families! households living in housing units smaller than 1,500 square feet in size ($34,579) is significantly lower than even the overall median income for the U.S. ($49,702). Then, in Table E-3, annual average household VMT was calculated from the NHTS datahase for a number of different income levels and ranges related to the resulting AHS income data in Table E-2. In order to calculate a corresponding trip rate for these new tiers, however, it was necessary to rely on comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $34,579 annual income category. First, it was determined that the average annual household VMT for the income level of the $34,579 is 20,976 miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in the U.S., nonnalized to the median-of-$57,167 (28,541 miles) category to derive a ratio of O. 735. Next, this ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average single family (Detached) housing unit size (i.e., 1,500 to 2,499 s.f.) to generate a daily VMT of 38.00 for the new tier, as shown in Table E-4. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed assessable trip length of 6.62 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of5.74 trips per day. Then, this trip rate was placed in the impact fee schedule to generate a net impact fee value for one of the new single family tiers. Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 E-l Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item No. 10A February 10, 2009 Page 183 of 191 Table E-5 illustrates the impact that the incorporation of the tiers for the Single Family (Detached) land use has on the County's calculated impact fee schedule. As shown in the table, the net impact fee for a housing unit ofless than 1,500 square feet is $8,668. Table E-1 Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics (1) , Calculated Values Excluding Trip Rate Assessable Trip " Daily, , Ratio,to Tiering , t (....,..g,... . ' Length fVML' ',' Mean' Single Familv (Detached) 7.R I 6.62 5 I .70 I .00 (I) Source: Appendix F, Tabte F-l Table E-2 AHS Median Income Data by Housing Size (1) 2005 AHS Median Income Data Annual, VA "',;,-,C. ':' "',.,)''''-- ....':...,,,.:<.'>....:..:,:.'."\.. I1",ome' , by Housing Size Less than I ,500 sf $34,579 I ,500 to 2,499 sf $57,050 2,500 sf or more $80,889 Average of All Houses $49,702 (I) Source: 2005 Amcrican Household Survey Table E-3 NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category (1) 2~Ol NHTS Trave!!lata by Anuual I Days Daily Ratio to Normalized " Annual HH Income VMTiHH VMT Mean '. to 1,128 Median of $34.579 20,976 365 57.47 0.829 0.735 Total (All Homes) 25.294 365 69.30 1.000 Median 01'$57,167 28,541 365 78.19 un 1.000 Median 01'$80,889 32.285 365 88.45 1.276 1.131 (1) Source: 2001 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 E-2 Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 184 of 191 EstiInl'tion ofTripRate By . , ,,,, y.,;, Tiet,". ,: ,;" ,', Single Familv (Detached) Less than 1.500 sf 1,500 to 2,499 sf 2,500 sf or larger Table E-4 Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier ." Trip,~$~f;) Assessable Trip ',,","Lh(2) "",;,' engt . ' Daily Ratio to vm(3) /Me~~(4) 5.74 7.81 8.83 6.67 6.62 6.62 38.00 0.735 51.70 1.000 58.47 I 131 (1) Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2) for each tiered single family land use category (2) Source: Table E-I (3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by total daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sflier for each tiered single family land use category (4) Source: Table E-3 Table E-5 Net Impact Fee by Single Family land Use Tier(1) Impact of Ti~ring on Fee I',' Assessable Trip Daily Net F~e(t) Trip Rate Schedule" ' "', ,',".."."', .',. Length , VM1' Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 sf 5.74 6.62 38.00 $8,668 1.500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 $11,760 2.500 sf or larger 8.83 6.62 58.47 $13,130 (t) Source: Appendix F, Table F-l Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. December 2008 E,3 Collier County TranspOltation Impact Fee Update Study APPENDIX F Calculated Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Agenda Item NO.1 OA February 10, 2009 Page 185 of 191 <l:(J)~ OO(J) ~O~ N~ o - 0 ZOCO ~ro E >-~ 2rom -::l0l "'~'" "O.D0.. ~(]) QiLL m <0: " :; '0 " .c CJ (/) " " "- - CJ .. c. .5 c: .2 1;; ,,;,t ,,-[ .!~ -ge 1-1- '" 1:' ~ o <.l ~ ~ o <.l '0 " 1;; :; CJ 7i <.l 6 . -J!t' Ii. a!~ 'K -. ! - ~h ~,~u ~ ~f':' ~5 r;; ... t~ '" h ;u .. r-:- .\: . z ~ g ~ T " ~ " ! o . - . .. ~ 2- c - ~~, l Ii ~ ~ R t ~ i ~ s' ~ ~ .b.E ~ 0<: ~ ~ ~ U " '"~ ,i ~~ " < E ,! '0 ~ ! , r.- .. -" '] ~ I-::- '" ;; H """" -o:j!: to fir--- ~ g ~ :3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U . ~ - ~ ~ "~, - , fr g, ~ 0- &~ " , , L . ~ ~ r;;u = -~ -" ! i- J t - , i ~ " " '" ~ . o <Ii n: ~~~-~~o>;! ~~~~~ijF'~ ~~~g~<]~ " . , . c Ji ~ ,C ,; ~ " "' " , vi ~ " ,. " ~ ~ < z < " z CO ~ ~ ~ , ;; ~ ~ " " , " " " " " o c' ~ . < < . k " ~, , c. " ::! - " , 0 ~ ~ , :: ~ 1] i3 ~ ~ - " -:::..:. ~ ] "- ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ,; . :;,; " " < 7 , ~ " " i . :: ,-c:: !1 "-'5 we ] ~ , ;,- = . :( " z , ~ c ~ l ~ i ] ., , , i < ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ " " ;z o " " " " " " c, " - C z < z < z < z " ~ ~ cf ~ ~ o C . " ~ '7 ~ Ji C c , iOl' J " ~ ~ " " ~ " Q ~ o>;! ] ~ r; v. -g ~ ~]Ji]"" :;; ii; , , . c . " " , ;; ~ ! . g , < . } " o c " ~ l: " o C ~ ~ ~ L g ~ ~ ~ a " ;: " " " 7. ~ ~ ~ " '~ , . c, . ~ i " z ~~ ~S ~~ ,,, ~] 7~ z " z c " o ~ ~ c. ~ " " " " ~ o :;; ~ " ;; " , l " " c = , , " ~ ;, ;, " ~ , ~ c , 3 " e " 1 , " o o ,; :i ;; ; :! . , , ~ - - ~ ir. , - g 3 z o , 7. S :i - " '6~ ~ " ~ j 3 . ~ " " ~ ;;; :j , I i ~ ~ '" c , ~ s o . j LE ,0 . . ] , ~ :! ;; ~ :i ;; , ~ 3: " " , N 3 , j o c o " c . , , " '" ] " ~ , i ~ I :: 8 .. g " ~ ;f " ~ ^ . ~ c , , U 3 . ~ , ;; ~ c ~ . ~ B , ! :1 ~ , ~ > ~ g. '" ~ ^ r), ~ ~ , ,. " c , ~ " c '0 -- 13 J ~ ~ " c '0 , " o e ~ 13 13 ~", 211 ~.s ~ ~ L ;:;:: z 8 8 -- j o .3 8 ;jj ~ -- , " fi ~ 00 ;,,;; :.::>z o ';;:~ > . > ~ ~ . , 0_ ~ i :Ii 6 g ~ > ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ 52 c~ ~~ o . -~ = ~ o~ , - ~ ~ ~ " " 'i ;; ~ :;; u iJ' ~ o ,2 ~ ~ " r " ~ a . " ;,; ;;; " 8 ~i '" ] j ,;..,. z " ~ "' y z , . ~ o ;; u ~ , o '..5 i ," ,0 .~ 3i :< "' -~ 'rH i-8 -,"" ;:; " u .= OJ it- ~ ~ ~ <(cn~ 000> ~o~ ""- .0 Of'- ~ro c:;>,~ 2roa> - =H" ro~ro -0.00. c:'" "LL OJ <( GI :; 'tl GI .J:; " Ul GI GI lI.. - " '" c, E :c'C ! .~ c:1;; ;t:: c: 0 Oc, ~~ -", Il.~ ,,!!!>. -g"E I- 5 u ~ ~ (5 U 'tl ,,!!! '" :; " ;; u r , , , , ~ ~ '" , , ~~ ~ ~ ,0 c . ~ 0 , - " - '" - c - - - ~ ~H < ~ c - . ~ ~ 1; " ~ ~ c q " ~ - - } aU ~ cf 6 ~ :;; ~ . ~ ~ ~ " < " " 5 :;; " . :;; ~ " ~ ~ :;; :;; :;; ~ -- le, ~ ~ ,- " ~ , - " - ., " - - -" ~ " " " ~ ~ :;; , i. ~ ~ ,; ~ ,. " 0 ~ ~ :f ~ ~ &: ~'; " " " ~ Ie--'- :;j!E"; - - - - ~n c , ~ ~ < < z " " " " " " " " " " " " " " l-<~,;u rrr. ~ . - 0 ~ - " - " - " " :;; " ,; " " " " " cf " " , ~ ~ ,; j , ,; , ,; ::>i f---'-- Oilil ~ < " 1: ~ ... " ~ ~~ " " - - " " " " - :;; ~ " " - " - " ;;; i .h i', ~ " - " .. c ~ - ~ " " .. - 1" ;;i c: ~ S " ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 5f g 0; 0; ~ " 0; " " " " " " " " "..'" ,...= n c . g 3 " < < ~ ~ ~ " = - - - . - - " .. ;:: " .. ;::: ;; .. - " " . " - . - " :;;;..:.... , , ~ , , , , , ~ , , ! . ] , , , ! " ~ ~ ~ l " l " , . ! I ! .;: ;; .;: .;: ~ \ , \ \ \ \ \ ~ " ~ , .;; ~, , ;ii ~ ~ ~ " c c c ~ C '0 U C ~ c u u u u .;: " - c < ~ ~ c " c ~ " " c ~ " " " u ~ u u u " ~ u u " " " - y '" z Z z z z z Z: Z: z z . , - ~, ;:-... ~ ~ ~ ~ ! " , .. , ~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ . .. " - - " " < < " " -=- 0 ! 0 c 0 .. , , , , , , , , , j ! j , l '" ~ ~ " " 'g , ~ ~ u " ~ " .;: .;: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , ~ ~ u u 3 '" '" , .;; " ~ ~ ~ ~ u C " " u ~ ~ ~ " u u u u u u u u $ 3 . , , ;x " , " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ " = ~ c " j , ~ u ~ u u u 'u U ',.! U u u " " " " . ,; z Z 7- z . z z z Z Z " u .. . -=- . ~ i. " 0 " 0 g ~ " ~ 0 '3 " .. .. ^ " .. - " " .. ^ " .. -, " " N .. - M - - " ~ "---- .!!'& H " 0 - - ~ ~ " " ~ c - < < - N 6 .. " " " " ^ ^ .. . - .. .. .. .. - - - ----'=- . . u " ~ ~ ~ . . " 0 0 " 0 B ~ j , ~ , ~ 0 0 0 . . , 0 g ~ ~ . " , . . " 0 ] ~ " , i " i " " , ! , " i " " " i " " , J ~ i! i! " l Ii Ii " ~ " ~ " ~ Ii Ii Ii " ~ , c .. c 0 .. ~ c c 0 ~ " ~ e ~ ~ w w W w ~ ~ ~ w " w " W " w ~ : " .. 0 0 .. - .. .. 0 0 0 ~ ~ " " " " " " -..,.,- .. . :i " " = . e g < , c ,~ - .. - . . " N ~ - - . " ;-;j .- . ~ s .. ; " ~ .. " - - "'j- ~ ~ !f ~ . ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ~. ~ ~ l! ~ , ~ ~ ~. ~ ~, . ~ , '< 0, ~ " ~, ~ , >", - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - - -..,.,- , 5 ,;i , t ~ , 0 ~ , '. i ~ , ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ '. o. '. '. '. " s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ , g, ] ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ 8 t " , " . 3 " ~ 1 i ~ if ~ - " ,>, ~ ~ ! 0 . " ~ !f ~ ~ , c ~ ~ I . ~ , ~ , " ~ , 2 ~ 1i ~ , ~ . E " " ~ " " , < Wi " . 0 0 0 0 5 0 " " , , 3 ~ " ~ ! 0 ! . ! , . ~ I I i I ~ , ~ ~ <. :7. - N . < " ~ , , ] w ~ , . ~ ~ . , ~ , ~ , , , ii , ! j , ~ ~ j ~ j , ~ ~ ~ " -i;- ~ " w u ~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 " . " " " " z II ~ 0 " 0 c c 0 0 '~9 " ~: < ~ " " " " " , " . ~ . . . . ;; ~~ ~~ 52 O~ u . t i;i ='8. ,0;0 U g " I o 'g " ~ o " '" N "' ~ ~ "u ~ ,.:( !~ It g .:::. N 6 i) , ~ ~ ::: ~ E iCll <(oo~ 000'> ~O~ N~ ci ~ 0 ZOro ~ro E ;>,~ .;Beam -"OJ CIl~CIl '0.00. cQ) Q)LL OJ <( ~ d . _J!i b' ~ i~ -- I _I ~ --:- ~h !~u " :; '0 " J: <J '" " " u. ti .. Q, E =c~ ~ .2 cO; ;:;~ 58- <J .. ;:-c , .. u.,:: .!,., .g't: >- 5 u ~ ~ '0 u '0 " 0; :; <J n; U . . ... ~~ l -~ ~ r-:-- ,~~ f-g-- , i .. , z ~ ~ .. , z . - ! i . a j . < .. -;:- ., . ;-1'0 B ..- - 1~ ~~ - ! ,; .i ~ t-- ~ . ~ t-- , o I, I I I~ L' \,. ~ I-- . .0 ,,0 -. ";.; ~.;S ~ , , , j , c * :3 a '" o " " " ~. s: j' ~ o , ;; ~ " , ,j '" j' ~ " " o o , , " u z - " :g :;:t 0' '" _<>5 "l i';=:Q J1 ~ ~ & & e ] 55 c:; " " '" @ ~ ] , l } , ~ , , , , u ~ " < ~ ~ " g ;; ~ . " , ' ~~!;~ ;L Y E z if, " , , ^ ~l~!~ ,-,-,,,, u -, ;L u g 7. ~ ~ o " '" ~ '" ~ " < . , , o . , , .:;:; , , i u ~ < ~ ~ " , ij ~ g s{ c ~ ];~~] 2",3 "e" ;:] ] o . g ~ ~ , $; 1 L , ' ~ "" ~l~ c c -;; I! ~~Q " i! c' :;; c " ,'" , , , ir. 'C_ ~~ ~ ~ , co' ] ~ !:l .o~~ q ~ ~~ " , , , < z < z ~ * ;;: " . "" x Q ;=:~] w]" i " E . , ~ . '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " '" u o ; ~ '" ~ cj , ~ , is ~ . :;z . , " " ~. o " , , , ij ^ " . , , " " 3 jj " e ~ N " ~ ! , ~ , " c g < z ~ " ~ " " - , " " u z ~ , l " " , ~ " v 2: , " " " " '" . 3 F' Q ,~ .:;:; eo ~ . - - " ! ! ~ , , ~ ~ <:" of' Z ~ ;; ~, , ~, c " " " ~ ~ 0: " ~ j " u , ~, " ~ 7 u :Z '" ~ ~!j:i ~ z g.\::, "" aiZ , Zii '" U e " ~. ! is , ~ 1 ~ & ~ - ~ - " , ~ ~~o "'if~ u " '" " N , ] i ~ , ~ i ~ i o " ~ , ~ ~ 0; ;; :g " t' ~ >il u e g '; , u , ~ 3; 'i - ~ ~ ! " , U L , ~ " u " ; ~ u z o " ~ g " U e . E , , , u " 1 I < . ~ 8 ~ " " " e " " J: " " . o s,;' " , ~ , " " . s , ~ :! , ij > " ~ b , ~ ~ ~ .. ~ .;:~, .J ~ ~ 1 ~ !i'---Et---i 7 of 8- . ~ Co ~ c .~ '" . '" 8 . :D " . fr 8 8 ~ .s ~ ~ 11 9- ] " " ~ ] " i 8- o ~ o 2 o 8- ~ . 3 . . 8 ~ g , 0 .::- 0 u ~ [,!l ~ c~ ~ ~2 ~ "'g ~ N .. "'::= ~ ~ ~ -t ~ ~ ~ ~::: ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~~-; ~] ~ ~-~ -g~ :, 5b 0) .a E .2;S 5i <:: ~ E ~.!2 ~~ .gJJ "" '" 5 E ~ ~ t:: ~ 51-< ~ a ;;:J~ ." ~ -;:- .6'-5 ~ ~ 0 13.2 ::.g "0::: 1< ,.., u... ,.. 0 ~ g ~ 2... ~, ~ ~ ;~ ....l t: g -;:; 5 "-l; '" .." u ~~ 5: i;, ],g, "'::= ,- ~ '-, ~:~ ~~ 0...... ;:;-. '-':::: ~ -0 ~;: K ~ 8- _"'~2g.] <' ~ ~ '0 ii OJ ~ ~~!~,j ~ 8~~~~~] Li! s'~ -= ~ ~ " F '- c- -;; 0 e: ~~~3%t'o E ;. z ~ ~:a e? C:O-'...;':::l '5. c.':~~~~ c- o __ ~ "iHH ~ '" -- to Il.> ... ~~ ;: _~'2 .s :: ;:; :5,~ -g -5 ..2 3'et~~ "3 HiH 1 if ~ ~ e '" ~ ~3,g~,~ ~ ~~i~~~1 -0 _ 0 0 OJ -.:U i U~ j i! ~ z ... _, _I- - z~ ",..... ~ " " " . 2 Ji o 'g " 8 c :"5 < ~ " -- v ~ , ! -j- , " , c 3 , ! , " , 7 < ~ -- ;; I!ii Co . " - . . -~ I;::; C. o~ , - ~ ~ o . .@ c ..8 ~ ~ c " ~ c. ,; o .. , c .~ ~ " I~ I.~ I~ <' "'w ~g .:::: N 3 ~ ~-@ ~ B ;:0 <(C>~ 000) =0..,- "'- .0 '0) .- ro E >>~ 2row -::>OJ ro~ro '0.00. c'" Q)LL OJ <( z o (f) c::: <( 0.. :2: o () UJ ~,~ uJ UJ u.. I- () <( a.. :2: a <( o a:: >- i:Q o >- UJ ~ ::!S ~ 1=J -< 1=J iil i=: 5 ::l -< ::E U '" -l ~ ::E ~ ::E ~ a a a U ~ U ;:! "" o f- UJ ::> '" 1=J a 2 -< g: ~ ~ [i: :r f- e;> >- i'5 0 -l i3 "" '" S :r o f- BJ UJ :r ~ >- af-f-~O "" -< _ UJ ::> o ~ ;,: ~ ~ 0:: "" '" "" ;:2 f- !z: UJI ~ f- ::> ;;i U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ ~ ~ M V M ~ ~ M ~ ~ 0 N - N v:iOiO..O-"...\C..MrAv:i"'1'''~N .....,~rA.....,rA rArAfA-""" o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0i0 v N N - ~ \CMV1,.Vt'M...l-V"lMt- r-"o"'-t-"~ r-"V')"'~"'M" ~ WO'}rAfA-fAfA-&':l-fA- ... ... o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ loCI loCI M \C 0i0 V M V V') \C['--.. vr-M..r-NMt- oo"-r...}'r-:-.:r" CJi'l:J"v"M' fA- ~(AfA-""'rAEAfA ... ... N V') V"l ~ v No 0 0 loCI \C V"l V"l M V"l V V"l ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ M V N No V') M V') 0i0 loCI ...... N"'!,OiONO'>O"OOo:::tMO\ 00"""" N_"CtQ" v"...... r-.:'","lrl"N fA- EAEA&'7foREAfAEA ... ... '2 "2 '2 "2 "2 "2 '2 "2 '2 "2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!r~rE~~]r ! ! ! ! l ! ! ! ! ! . ~ ~ o .~ 1.0 'C 1..0 ;":' ~.9 .8 - il '" '" $...J;::O 0\ !5 . ^ a:: ~ erN '" B o 0 S\ 0 '" v >- >- -l d -l ~ ::E ~ -< -< f- ... ... iil UJ UJ o -l -l - e;> 0 '" ~ ~ ;:! '" '" UJ '" ::J o Z -< -l ~'ii~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~8.< N <( ..( ~ ~~e;> ~>->-~ _ ....J ....J >- ~ ~ ~ ~ ... , UJ ::3 ..!. E= ~ C) ::i ...J ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " .C <Il .9 .~ '" ~ N 0 ..!. VS UJ + '" '" 6 ~ ~ :r - :z: ~ z ::> a:E ::E ~ ~ ~ ::> a "l f- - u ::t z 2SUJ@UJ 82UJ::E Q , -l ;:! Z :r iil i=: a S2 a UJ U :r ::E 0:: o 0 0 0 000 0 r..: 00 0 ci 00 No C\ 0 0'1 I)Q v.. M lr\" M M M" wo;fAGAfA o 0 0 0 o 0 C! 0 00 N 0.; r- N 0\ 0\ ..,.., NOON \D~~MN EA~~~ 000 0 o 0 ~ 0 00 M 0.; r- N 0\ 0\ V'l NOON ~i~fi o:::t N M 0 - 0.. ..,.., - If"i -.i -.c 0 \0 \0 N 00 r- Q'\ Vi N r--: ..; o:::t~ o:::t~ V}~if"tV} s s s ~ ~ ~ a - - () 0 0 0 ::l. c... c... 0.. . -l UJ f- a :r '" UJ ~-l-l5~ G UJ '-'l Vl ~ o f- f- -l - :3 @ ~ :;! ~ o 0 0 0 o 0 0 ~ -.0 0.; 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ON"M~O'" o:::t "<j' V} - 00'" ... ... o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 -i- r...: 0 0\ O\_ooM 00 N O\~ M~ O\~ \D~ M .- t! a {,4 ~ ... o 0 0 0 o 0 q 0 M r...: 0 0\ N-OOM o N 0\ !""'I,. O~ \O~ M~ on .... ... 00'" ... ... o M \0 0\ o:::t ..,.., N .- N 00 M 0\ r- "<j' ..,.., MO\\Oo:::t M o:::t~ ;:f f"')'" .... on ~ o~ ~ ~ - ... "" "" ~ ..c; 0 o 5 '5 ~~ ~ Vj :::c ~ ~ ~ ct ~ . '" U i=: '" -< ~ >- Q ~ '" UJ :2 '-'l f- Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a f- -< Vl ~UUJ;>;UJu 0:: "" ;; Ql ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 00 ..0 N r...: 0'1 :! ~ :G o:::t"_oO{A ... ... "" o 0 0 0 o q 0 q ~ ~ ~ g OC"!\Oo~ 00'" QO~ - ~ ~ ~ ... 000 0 o q 0 q N _ 0.; V'l 00 '"' 0 M C"! \0 0" o~ 00" NEAEAEA ... _\O~M OOMI.('}V'1 ...._' ..0 -i- .- '" 0 - o:::t 0::1"",0::1" 00" 0" -... ... ... ... ";;; ";;; l:: C> C>. go 1.1 ~~ -g ::0 _ Vi ~ If ~ ~ -l a a :r UJ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8-l; ~ ~~~~~ i=: '" 0:: ::> UJ '" a ::> ::r: -l 2S :r z U UJ <1:0)~ 000) ~O~ N_ O - 0 ZOO ~Ol E >-..- 2ro<D -:00> ro~ro u.oll. c'" (j)LL OJ <1: z o C/) 0:: <( a.. :2 o u W f- ~ W W Li.. f- U c:: :2 o <( o 0:: >- g g g g g a::l 00 N It:i 0 d a ~ UJ !Xl ~ I.r) 1.0 V) o ~>~_~~"I.O~~ < ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ol ~ '-'l U :@ ::j '" ~ :0 ~ o ~ 0 0 '" 8 ii! u ~ e.. o f- '-'l :0 is ::: 0 9 ;;:i r:: ct ~ o 000 0 o 0 ~ 0 0 ::c a; -.0 .". ...0 lf1 b>~"f;i;~~ Z Cl '-"'t ~ ~ ~ ~ '-'l :0 ..J f- e.. Vl C2 f- o 0 0 0 0 "TI 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ...... 0\ -0 lXl II") @ t;>9-q~g~" VJUJ::r::zo NN- o ~ ~ UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e.. ~ :; ..J :0 o '" ;> e.. 1;; g: C2 f- i :::1 :0 ;;:i U ~ &) 8 ~ ~ o 0 It:i M N '<1" .". N V) M VI.. c--." 0'1 t'"1 N NO. _ ~OA~~"'" c c ;: t= c .:j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i . . ~ E ~ " " " a a Vl Vl o o 0 on on r-: r-" '-'l V ^ Vl UJ '-'l :0 0 0 O '-'l UJ ..J ..J Z ..J ..J ~ 0 0 ..J..J U U o ~ ~ a 8 ~ ~ '-'l C/} :r:: V) V'J ~ UJ U 0:: 0:: ~ ...,JCI)UJUJU 2 :I: 2: 2: >< :@~55c5 o 0 0 0 o 0 C! ~ oQ N M ...... ~ Sj .,.) 1"""1" o 0 ~ 0 '" '" N 00 .,. on '" " 0:: 00 ~ "" "" '" "" ;A "" "" o 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 000 0 ~ r-..: lri ..0 oci r--: 1.0 V) ...... 0\ -..:t _ l"'N NMV) \J;)""'; N" 0" 0:: 0' ~V)w~(A~ 000 ~ 0 0 M r-.: vi '" on r-- N ~""'; N" fA fAW fA 000 000 ...0 00 r-.: '" .,. N '" on 0' C1I" 0" "" .,. "" r- M \0 r- M M 0\ N ""! 0 M ~ ~ 0\ M ...0 ~ l(') r- OV)OO o 0 o:t N 0" trI o t-" ."." N r-" N .,. fAfAfAfAf.Af.A 't: 't: 't: 't: 't;; ';;;: o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o. o. o. o. o. 5- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w:: ~ c:: ~ d-~t 1..0 V'J 0 0 _ o 0 0 0 ~ 000 U:Ooo"O- oooV'JUJ gO'i'1'8u 'oU: goggOL.:.. 0060"00 00"00'7....J V) V) N^ W UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ <r:: uuuuuuu ~G:Ei:~;:::G:a l.l.. ~ ~ u.. L.:.. ~ UJ 000 0 00;;: o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-.: M oQ - M It:i N ...0 ~ ~ 00 ...0 0\ 00 V) ~ M r- 00 0 0 0 0\,,0\ 1:'1.Ol';,l'-V)V) r<'),N.. NdMNN" NM\O"i.4":J:J~ V}V}~V}~V}V}V}if't ...,..., o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 \0 00 00 00 N ~.. r:;..,.. gf 00" r-" ;e" \0" 00" ",," ~EA~~94...,94...,~ o 0 0 0 o 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ...... 0 :;1; ~ &: ~ M M" ~ N "" "" "" "" o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ M...... M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N v \0 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 0 v 00 00 0 \0 00 00 00 N ~ ~ ~ v ....c 0\" 0" QI!J" r-" \0" 'C.. 010" 0\" M" M ~" N" N N (,00)...... V} V} EA'iAEAv:.EAEA'iA'iAEA EA ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ...... ~ 0\ ...... 010 00 ~ 00 0 0 N \0 ~ M ~ 0 ...... ~ M ...... ~ \0 ~ 0 N r- oo" 00" r-" \C" "'!.. ~.. ....c r-" ~.. r-" r-" N" N ~...... NEA 'iA {A'iA'iA'iA~EAV}EA'iA 'iA'iA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g 8 g g g g g g g g ~ q q q "q q s q q q q 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ i & i . ti lZ CL: Ci:: ~ c:: ;a c-c-c-c- ....:I d- rJ) rJ) iZ) IZl iZ) 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 000 o 0 000 -ltZoo"oo"o" o~ooo ~$2, I~"'f ~ 0 0 000 0:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 >0000"0"0"0" t-oo"o~oo -l \r, \r, N ~ ..J :S ..J ..J ..J d ..J ..J 3 &l 3 3 3 ~ 3 3 ~ B5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii 0- g ~ ~ ~.. c- I- o rJ) * rJ) o. 0 ~ 0 '780:0 0' f- '" g ~ rJ) e 0' UJ>< o ^ ~ u ~ ....:I ~ ~ :;;: 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ii: e.. ~ o f- '" . 0:: . UJ il e.. :> :0 0 '" ~ f- f- Iii -gj, ;;;: :;: UJ > f- ii! z ~ ~ UJ ~ ;;: 1;; ~ ~ <(m~ 9.g~ ~~ ,0 .:J~ ~m E >-~ >- 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E::rn<ll i:ll 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -00> 0 ~ <0 .,; '" <0 '" .,; ,.; .,; '" d d <0 <0 .,; <0 .,; rn ~ rn W N ... ... 00 ... '" on '" - 0 '" 0 00 '" '" 'l> v...oa.. :.: w - ~ .... "'. on '" ... '" on 0 '" 00 '" 'l> '" N 0 '" "'. e Q) U ~ 0 > "" '" ...; d' .....' 0 '^ ",. N ...; ...; '" ...... N Q)LL <C 1ii 1= "" ::: "" - - 00 '" N ... 00 '" '" "" "" 0> i:ll - "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ;;i U ~ "" <( -l ~ :::> -l ~ 0 0 0 ~ U U ~ "- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <=> <=> <=> '" <=> '" <=> <=> 0 <=> <=> '" <=> <=> <=> <=> <=> 0 '" 0 0 ::c '" ~ d N <0 N d "8, '" ,.; '" <0 N <0 f-< f-< on N '" N '" on '" '" N on 'l> 'l> '" N '" W :::> " >- "1. N on on 'l> 'l> '" '" ... '" 0 '" <=> "'. CJJ w 1ii ",- .. '" .,; "" "" 0 "" .,; d' 0 '" d' "" :f - 2 f-< 0 0 "" '" "" N '" '" N '" ... '" "" "" "" ;;i ::c ~ "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ f-< -l "" ~ "- CJJ "- 02 f-< 0 0 <=> 0 0 <=> 0 0 <=> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" <=> '" 0 0 <=> 0 0 '" 0 <=> 0 0 0 0 '" 0 z ::c '" "" d N <0 N d <0 '" ,.; '" <0 N <0 0 0 f-< '" :;r N '" N '" on '" M '" N on 'l> 'l> '" N '" W " >- "1. N on on 'l> 'l> '" '" ... '" <=> '" 0 "'- en CJJ w ::r: 1ii "" .. '" :f "" "" 0 "" :f d' 0 '" d' "" .,; - c:: 2 f-< f-< 0 "" ::: "" N '" '" N '" ;J; M '" "" - "" ;;i ~ :::> "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" <{ 0 -l f-< "" Il. 0:: ~ CJJ ::E "- >, f-< " 0 .3 UJ (,) '<0 0 !-lJ 0 N '" 'l> on 00 ... '" 00 '" 0 '" 0 '" 00 on 00 - .~ '" "" '" '" ~ 0 '" "i '" 'l> ~ ~ 0 '" N ~ '" '" M '" <0 "" on '" d on <0 N <0 on d ~ '" f-< '" '" '" '" on M '" '" N 00 '" ..... 'l> '" on '" " UJ Z 00. o. ..... "'. '" 'l> '" 0 '0, '" '" '" '" 0 00 "'. 1;1 UJ ~ ~I d' - "" '" .. ...; '" ",. '^ .. ...; "" d' ~ u. "" !::; "" N ;J; - '" on 0 ;J; '" "" "" "5 "" "" - "" "" "" "" "" "" u f-- "" "" "" OJ :::> u (,) U ~ <{ Il. ] "" ::E ~ ,,9 0 '" ~ '" ~ " '" '" ~ ~ '" '" '" '" on "0 . 0 . . '0 '" ~ 0 0 0 "- 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ';l 0 " 0 ~ 0 " i;' 0 0 0 i;' 0 0 0 0 0 '" . 0_ , o. . 0_ ~ o. o. s ::. ::. s 0_ o. N c:: '" ~ Cl ~ '" '" ~ 0- ~ ~ " " :; " " :; :; " :; " " " " ~ ~ . .t . . . . . .t ~ . "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- '0; 0 ~ 0 '0 5- 1;1 " "5 & u OJ .?;> u " '" . Q. e . EO t: ~ "" ~ '" 6: u z ~ -l ~ !J " 0 0 ~ <C ,,9 . w -" 02 ~ '" CJJ 1= '" " ::c * :::> * i5 N ~ CJJ .s .s CJJ ::c f-< >, * .s ~ '" ~ CJJ CJJ >, '0 0 , :::> .3 q CJJ ~ ~ :;i CJJ :;; . ~ '0 ~ I> '" .<; CI ~ ~ -;; ,<; W 0 ~ -l oj 0:: 15 u; 00 u CJJ ~ ~ w 0 -l " Q f-< <C CI <C 0:: 00 0 0' ~ ~ VJ N VJ </J CJJ cii U <C f-< ~ :::> 0 f-< 0 CJJ U ::c 0 ,S '" w :::> " " '" 0 N f-< f-< '" ~ u u <C f-< I?i z u CI " <C ::c ,S 13 z z CJJ w 1ii z :::> -l :l ;;i ;;i Ul i:ll ~ - ~ '" <C "- ~ 1;\ ~ w 0 -< > > f-< " ~ :::> 02 -l CJJ " . 15 -l ffi ffi 0 '" ~ <C <C ~ ;;i </J ~ '0 " :::> :::> f-< </J </J </J '" f-< W ] .", -< -< -l :.: </J ~ i:2 i:2 CJJ </J 15 f-< f-< 0 W U > ~ :::> <.L ~ :::> w ~ . CJJ Z ~ ~ z z 1ii CJJ ~ ~ CJJ </J c.. 5 -l 0 . ;;J ~ -< :::> 0 0 1= '" :::> <C -< '" :::> 15 :::> 'f . " </J 0' U U Z -l i:ll i:ll </J -< " i:ll .