BCC Minutes 07/29/1980 R
!'
I
II
f
I
~
~
}
~
~
~,
I
'-'.:=]
I~.=J
L.-:J
Naples, Florida, July 29. 1980
LET IT BE REMEMBERED. that the Board of County Commissioners in and for
the County of Collier. and also acting as the Governing Board(s) of such
special districts as have been created according to law and having con-
ducted business herein. met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in Regular Session in
Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Clifford Wenzel
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Thomas P. Archer
John A. Pistor
C.R. "Russ" Wimer
David C. Brown
ALSO PRESENT: William J. Reagan. Clerk; Harold Hall. Fiscal Officerl
Chief Deputy Clerk; Darlene Davidson and Edna Brenneman (1:30 P.M.),
Deputy Clerks; C. William Nonnan, County Manager; Donald Pickworth. County
Attorney; Anthony Pires, Assistant County Attorney; Thomas Hafner. Public
Safety Administrator; Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator;
Danny Crew. Planning Director; Lee Layne, Planner; Richard Henderlong.
Planner; Dr. Jay Hannie. Environmental Consultant; Rollie Rice. Parks and
Recreation Director; Clifford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator;
Irvi ng Berzon. Util Hy Of rector. and Raymond Barnett. Deputy Chief.
Sheriff's Department.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
July 29. 1980
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS SPEAKING ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER
PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING HEARD.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE
NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH
EXPLA~ATJON TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS
PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD
UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS" AT 11:00 A.M.
1 . I NVOCATl ON
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
!
I '
BOOK ~54 rACE B9
MO~ 054 PACE 90
July 29. 1980
4. APPROVAL OE. MINUTES: July 1 (Special Meetfng) & July 8
5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATION OF AWARDS
G. SOCIAL SERVICES
7. ~DVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Petftfon CP-BO-4-C, nruce Green and Assocfatp.s: requestfng
Comprehensfve Plan Amendment from 0-6.22 residential land
use to 6.22-30 residential land use on Lot 104. Naples
Grove & Truck Company's Little Farms No.2 which is located
~n the east side of Kelly Road and north of Thomasson
Drfve. (Communfty Development) (This fs a companion
petftion to R-80-8-C)
B. Petition R-80-8-C. Bruce Green and Associates: requesting
rezoning from "GRC" General. Retail. Commercial and "RM-l"
residential multi-family to "PUD" Planned Unit Development
on Lot 104, Naples Grove and Truck Company's Little Farms,
"0. 2. (Community Development) (This is a companion
petition to CP-80-4-C)
C. Petition CP-80-5-C, Rollie Rice for Board of County
Commissioners: requesting a ComprehenSive Plan Amendment
from 0-6.22 residential land use to recreation open space
land use for property located in Section 11, T51S. R26E
which i~ lo~~tprl II? milp. south of US 41 and 1 1/3 miles
east of SR 951. (Community Development) (This is a companion
petition to R-80-l2-C)
D. Petition R-80-12-C, Rollie Rice for Board of County
Commissioncrs: requestfng rezoning from "A" Agriculture
to "RO" recreation open space for property located in
Sectiun 11, T51S, R26E. (Community Development) (This
is a companion petition to CP-80-5-C)
E. Petition CP-80-9-C, County Planning Department: requesting
an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from
agriculture land use to low density 0-2 units per gross
acre residential land use for property within Section 36,
T46S, R28E which is located on Lake Trafford Road and
West of Little League Road, Immokalee. (Community Development)
F. Petition NZ-80-5-C, amending the ST regulations by removing
mangroves and submerged lands below the 2 foot NGVD from
the ST designation and by excluding these areas from being
eligiblc for TOR's. (Community Developmen~i
G.
Petition NZ-80-6-C, County Planning Department: requesting
amendments to Zoning Ordinance 76-30 by changing the
offstreet parking requirements for various uses and amending
the definitions sections to include supermarkets and shopping
centers. (Community Devslopment)
H.
Petition NZ-80-8-C. Coral Ridge Collier Properties, rnc:
r"(l'r,,~tin!l <In amp.ndment to Section 5-1 of the Pel ican Bay
PUD to allow for Garden Apartments in the Group 2 Section
of the Pelican Bay PUD. (Community Development)
L~~' ,
....
r----1
(
jI
, :'f~fA'~", ,~di
!
I
!
I
I
.J
l'
J
1
1:01
1=_J
L_I
July 29. 1980
I.
Petition R-80-10-C. British. Franco, Canadian Corp:
requesting rezoning from "MHRP" Mobile Home Rental Park
to "p~Dn Planned Unit Development on property Jocftted
in Section 33. T50S. R26E which is located on the northeast
side of Barefoot Williams Road Sout~ of US 41. (Community
Development)
J.
Petition R-80-13-C, Phil Cubine representing over 50%
of property owners located on Myrtle Layne: requesting
rezoning of the above described property and more particularly.
Lots 1-22. Block A and Lots 1-23. Block B. Myrtle Cove
Acres. (Community Development)
K.
Petition SMP-80-1-C, Donald Bellamy: requesting subdivision
master plan approval of Mentor Pines Subdivision located in
Section 24, T48S, R25E. which is located at the east end
of Mentor Drive in Willoughby Acres. (Community Development)
L.
Petition CCCL-80-1-C. Wafaa Assaad: requesting a variance
from the Coastal Construction Control Line on property
in Section 16, T49S. R25E which is known as Naples Cay.
(Community Development) (This is a companion petition
to R-80-9-C)
M.
Petition R-80-9-C, Wafaa Assaad representing John Pulling,
David Jones, Robert Benson: requesting rezoning from
~RM-2" multifamily to RM-2GH multlfamily group housing
on property in Section 16, T49S. R25E which is known
as Naplcs Cay. (Community Dcvelopment) (This is a
companion petition to CCCL-80-1-C)
N.
Petition NZ-t_80-2. County Planning Department: ordinance
repealing Ordinance 80-46 reo Petition NZ-I-80-1. adopting
new provisions reo residential buffer zones. (Planning)
O.
County Planning Department: requesting approval of an
ordinance amending ordinance 80-48 which rezoned lots 71-75
and lots 88-93 Plantation Island Mobile Home Subdivision
from "RM-IA" multi-family to "MHSD" Mobile Home Subdivision
to correct a typographical error in the legal description.
(Planning)
P .
Ordinance creatin9 the Housing Finance Authority of
Collier County. (County Attorney) .
8. OLD BUSINESS
A.
An Emergency Ordinance amE:llding County (,Irtlinance No. 80-54
relating to the r1arco Commllnity Center Municipal Service
Taxing Unit by providing that the governing body of the
unit shall not have the power to levy ad valorem taxes
in excess of one (1) mil in anyone' year. (County Attorney)
BOOK 054 PACE.. 91'
JI
~-';~~;"" . ..
!OOK 054 PACE 9t
July 29. 1980
1
9. REQUESTS FOR ADVERTISING
A. Ordinance amending Ordinance 80-47, the County's Parking
Ordinance. (8/26/80)
B. Petition CP-80-1l-C, Wafaa Assaad representing Robert
Tuyls: requesting a land use plan amendment from
residential 0-6.22 units and commercial land use to
residential 6.22-30 units on property in Section 1.
T50S. R25E located between Davis Boulevard and Estey
Avenue, northcast of Bill Barnett Toyota. (9/9/80)
(This is a companion petition to R-OO-23-C)
C. Petition R-80-23-C. Wafaa Assaad represcnting Robert
Tuyls: requesting rezoning from "GRC" general rctail
commercial & "RM-l" multifamily to "PUD" Planned Unit
Development on property in Section 1. T50S, R25E located
between Davis Boulevard and Estey Avenue NE of Bill
Barnett Toyol~. (9/9/80) (This is a companion petition
to CP-80-11C)
D. Petition R-80-7-C, R. C. Hunter: requesting rezoning
from "A" Agriculture and "A-ST" Agriculture Special
Treatment to "CI" Commercial Industrial and "CI-ST"
Commercial Industrial Special Treatment on property in
the N 1/2 of the S l/2 of the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4.
Section 11, R25E on the west side of Airport Road,
North of Pinc Ridge Road. (9/9/80)
E. Petition R-80-22-C, Fred J. Morrison: requesting rezoning
from "MIlSD" Mobile Home Subdivision to "RM-l" multifamily
on property in Section 3 and 10, T51S, R26E approximately
350' east of SR 951 on Hal iday Manor Drive. (9/9/80)
F. Petition R-80-24-C, Kings Lake. ltd: requesting an
amendment to Kings Lake PUD by making minor language
corrections and changes. Property located in the west
of 1/2 of Section 7, T50S, R26E. (8/26/80)
G. Petition CP-80-10-C, Fred G. strom: requesting amendment
to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from residential
6.22-30 units land use to commercial land use on the south
1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 1.
T50S, R25E, located on the northwest corner of Donna and
Gail boulevards. (9/9/80) (This is a companion petition
to R-80-21-C)
H. Petitloh R-80-21-C, Fred G. Strom: requesting rezoning
from "A" Agriculture to "PC" Professional Commercial on
the south 1/2 of the nol'theast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4
of Section 1, T50S. R25E located on the northwest corner
of Donna & Gail Boulevards. (9/9/80) (This is a companion
petition to CP-80-10-C)
I. Petition to vacate Units 196 through 203. inclusive.
Golden Gate Estates. (8/26/80)
J. Recommpnrlat.;on for approval of acceptance and recordat.ion
of Quit Claim Deeds conveying right-of-way for Auto Ranch
Road, setting a public hearing date for the creation of
the "Auto Ranch Road Improvement District" and approval
of the preliminary assessment roll. (8/2~/80)
r-----1
r-....-.'
r
i/
';>~. ... ..'....-.....-.
.' ..'_.~.:"c~~'~_____
i.
t
_J
L_._I
July 29, 1980
L_J
K. Recommendation for creation of the "Bay Street and most
southerly 270 feet of Fern Drive Improvement District".
approval of the assessment roll and authorize advertisement
of bids. (8/26/80)
L. Recommendation for extension of current Immokalee. garbagc
franchise agreement and advertisement of public hearing.
(8/26/80)
10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. COUNTY MANAGER
(1) Recommendation to modify the lease agrcemcnt with
Ms. Blye Treadway to correct a typographical error.
(2) Rcquest by Mr. Ron Faulkner to obtain a concealed
pic:tol permit.
(3) Rccpmmendation for special workshop meeting for
presentation of consultant's repo~t on dual taxation.
(July 31 at 9:00 a.m.)
(4) Recommendation of the addition of a regular BCC
employce custodial position for the Golden Gate
Community Ccnter to rcplace recently terminated
CETA custodial position.
(.)
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(1) Petition PU-80-6-C, William Hunt: requesting
provisional use (15) of the "RO" district for a
Hodel Flyio:g Club on part of the NW 1/4 of the
SE l/~ of Section 11, T51S. R26E. (This is a
companion to petitions CP-80-5C and R-80-12-C)
(2) Pctition PU-80-8-C. School Board of Collier County:
requesting provisional use (3) of the RS-3 single
family district for a school on Block 247 in Unit 7,
City of Golden Gate. located south of Golden Gate
Parkway and west of Tropicana Boulevard.
(3) Petition PU-80-10-C, Exxon Corporation: requesting
provisional use (1) of the Agriculture District for
oil and gas exploration in part of Section 22, T50S.
R33E which is located approximately 20 miles east
of interscction of US 29 and Alligator Alley.
(4) Petition FP-80.5-C, U.S. Homes: requesting final
plat approval for Coca Ciega Village, formerly
Lakewood Unit Soven, located east of Lakewood
Subdivision and north of Naples South.
MOX eM PAGE 93
II
i':'~:':"~
....
l
l
July 29. 1980
600K 054 PACE 9(
C. PUll LX ~__'i..qRKS
'(l) Recommendation to authorize issuance of one 8"
W~tcr Well Permit No. 65.317--Imper1~1 Golf Club,
Inc.--Section 15, T48S, R25E.
(2) Recommendation for final acceptance of a portion of
North Barfield Drive and a portion of Elkcam Circle.
(3) Recommendation for preliminary acceptance of various
strcets within Marco Beach. Unit 6.
(4) Recommendation for preliminary acceptance of Palm
Rivcr Estates, Unit 7, and one-year maintenance
surety.
(5) Recommcndation for approval of asphalt lcveling of
11 portion of C. R. 846.
(6) Recommendation to accept petition to establish
road improvement district for Cope Lane.
(7) Recommcndation for approval and acceptancc of
irrevocable letter of credit and execution of
Quit-Claim Ueed rclease for security on Royal
Palm Golf Estates.
D. PURCHASING
(1) Recommcndation to award Bid g~26, Goldcn Gate
Community Center, addit10nal parking spacc.
(2) Recommendation to declare library duplicator
surplus and authorize sale of 5am~.
(3) Recommendation to award Bid 6427 - Cooling Tower
and Fan for the complex.
(4) Recommendation to act on Bid #422 - Fishing Reefs
off Marco Island.
(5) Recommendation to award Ilids #423 & 424 for four
laning of Goodlette Extension and Airport Road.
(6) Recommendation to award Bid #429 for the paving
and drainage of Karp.n Drive and Cottage Grove
Avenue.
(7) Request to contract to purchase and install an
air conditioning unit for Building "A".
(8)
Emergency purchase of air conditioning system
for Stockade.
'.'
r---l
r'''1
'~1.'t1lrJ, ,
'-;~."'-:-' .~.' -.---..--.
;-.,:,:~~_~I.
t
r...=.J
L~J
,._.~]
July 29. 1980
E. SOCIAL SERVICES
(l) Request for grant application approval for Homemakers
Service of Collier County.
F. ZONING
(1) Corrective resolution relating to Petition V-80-8-C,
Virgil Marcum: requesting 25'. front & rear yard
variances on lots 11 and 13. Woodland Park. an
unrecorded subdivision.
(2) Resolutions to recover funds expended by the County
to abate public nuisance (weeds and vegetation):
(a) Lot 2~ Block 277. Unit 8. .Marco Beach
(b) Lot 1, Block 79. Unit 3. Marco Beach
(c) Lot 27, Block 122. Unit 4. Marco Beach
(d) Lot 10. Block 122. Unit 4. Marco Island
(e) Lot 9, Block 122. Unit 4. Marco Bp.ach
(f) Lot 15, Block 77. Unit 3, Marco Island
(g) Lot 4. Block 178. Unit 7. Marco Beach
(h) Lot 1, Block 183, Unit 7. Marco Beach
(i) Lot 6. Block 55, Unit 2, Marco Beach
(j) Lot 10. Block 183. Unit 7. Marco Beach
(k) Lot 4, Block 368. Unit ll. Marco Beach
(1) Lot 7. Block 45. Unit 4. Naples Park.
11. [)_^J-'U~J~OCESS!t1g_r~A)!!,g~_..~_L~JXQ.l.{l
12. UTILITY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT
(1) Water and Sewer Facilities Acceptance: Lely Barefoot
Beach Unit 1. Dominica lane.
(2) Engineering Consultant Agreement - County Water
Treatment and Transmission System.
(3) Notice to proceed - Willoughby Acres Water and
Sewer Improvements.
(4) Contract Change Order No.2 - Willoughby Acres
Water and Sewer Improvements.
B. GOODLAND WATER SYSTEM
(l) Status report on Goodland Water System. (Continued
from 7/8/80 Agenda)
800K 054 PAGE 95
".'~"~o'
a
[
;
I
f
I
t
l
aoOK 054 PACE 96
July 29. 1980
13. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
14. CLERK TO THE BOARD'S REPORT
A. Payment of bills
B. Budget amendments
C. Other
15. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A. Appointments to Housing Finance Authority.
B. L iew of Sheriff's Budget (Deadline for approval: August 1)
16. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
17. NEW BUSINESS
l8. PUBLIC PETITIONS
A. Presentation by Mr. & Mrs. Gary Hancotte reo Golden Gate
Estatcs Intcrim Action Program.
19. ADJOURN
AGENDA - APPROVEn WITH ADDITIONS. DELETIONS, AND NOTATIONS
Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried
unanimously 5/0. that the agenda be approved with the following additions.
deletions. and notations:
I. Presentation re treatment plant provisional use for Wyndemere
Development - added to Public Petitions.
2. Consideration re adoption of Ordinances creating the Housing
Finance Authority - to be scheduled for 1:30 P.M.
3. Request for approval to change a stockade position added to
10A5.
4. Commissioner Hrown requested time under 15C to make a motion
re notification of property owners affected by staff's proposed
plans for rezoning portions of Golden Gate Estates.
5. Discussion re Double Taxation (Item 10A3) - deleted.
r----l
c-'
~~.
"~
-;1..~"'~
p'"
---';
.- --.
'_t
I__J
C=.-J
July 29. 1980
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING 7/1/80 & REGULAR MEETING 7/8/80 - APPROVED
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried
unanimously 5/0. that the minutes of the Special Meeting of July 1, 1980 and
the Regular Meeting of July 8. 1980. be approved as presented.
ORDINANCE NO. 80-55 RE PETITION CP-80-4C. BRUCE GREEN & ASSOC., APPROVING
A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE AMEMDMENT FROM 0-6.22 TO 6.22-30, ON LOT 104,
NAPLES GROVE & TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO.2 - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
May 18, and 28, 1980 and readvertised on June 27. 1980. as evfdenced by
Affidavits of Publication on file with the Clerk. public hearing. having
been continued by the 80arJ of County Commfssioners on June 3, 1980 due
to advertising error. was open~d to consider Petftion CP-80-4C, filed by
Bruce Green and Associates and Doyle Hopkins. Said petition is requesting
a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment from 0-6.22 residential land use
to 6.22-30 residential land use on Lot 104. Naples Grove and Truck Company's
Little Farms NC'. 2, which is located on the east 5 ide of Kelly Road ami
north of Thomasson Drive.
Planner Lee Layne presented Petition CP-80-4C, and located the subject
property on an overhead map. She explained that the purpose for the requested
amendment is to allow for the ~evelopment of moderate income rental hOLJsing.
Ms. Layne stated that the petition has been reviewed for compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and received 38 points on the rating system. of which 31
are required for a positive recommendation; that the amendment falls within
the maximum density land use of 16 units per acre; that the proposed develop-
ment will be compatible with the sUI'rounding area; and the staff is recom-
mending approval of Petition CP-80-4C with the following stipulations:
1. Mfnimum of 75' buffer between Kelly Road right -of-way and
building construction line.
2. PI'ovide 7/10 of an acre for a neighborhood park
Ms. Layne reported that the CAPC has recommended approval subject to
the staff stipulations, and that Mr. Green is present for questions. In answer
to Commissioner Wimer, Ms. layne explained the compatibility of the proposed
moderate income rental development relative to the properties on the north and
south of the proposed site. She explained that these lands
~OOK 054 PACE 97
',f;t -- -- . ~7Ji -
~,
.1.'
l
~OOK 054- rACE 98
JulY-19. 1980
are presently zoned "RM-l". which will allow up to three story Single
. "" ":
family duplex or triplex ~partments, and these lands are deSignated as
0-6.22 residential land us~ within the Comprehensive Plan.
Hearing that there were no registered speakers who wished to address the
subject pet1tion, Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor
and carried unanimously that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried
4/1. with Commissioner Wenzel opposed. that, pursuant to staff stipulations.
the Ordinance as numbered Jnd entitled below be adopted and entered into
Ordinance Book No. 11.
ORDINANCE 80 - 55
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCF- 79-32. THE
COMPREHENSIVE PL1\N FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT
WORK STUDY AREA MAP NUMBER 3 FROM COMMERCIAL
AND RESIDENTIAL 0-6.22 UNITS TO RESIDENTIAL
6.22-30 UNITS PER ACRE ON THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED PROPERTY: NAPLES GROVE & TRUCK
COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO.2, LOT 104 AND
BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
ORDINANCE NO. 80-56 RE PETITION R-80-8C. APPROVING A REZONING FROM "GRC"
& "RM-l" TO "PUD" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 104, NAPLES GROVE AND TRUCK
COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO.2 - ADOPTED: PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT TO STIPULATIuNS _
ACCEPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News cn May 1.
1980, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication previously filed with the
Clerk. public hearfng. having been continued from June 3, 1980, was
opened to consider Petition R-80-8C. filed by Bruce Green and Associates
and Doyle Hopkins, requesting a rezoning from "GRC" Gencral Retail
Commercial. and "RM-l" Residential Multi-family, to "PUD" Planned Unit
Development on Lot 104, Naples Grove and Truck Company's Little Farms
No.2.
Planner Lee Layne presented Petition R-80-8C and explained that it
is a companion to Petition CP-80-4C; that the purpose of the requested
rezone is to allow for development of 160 moderate income rental units;
and that all County agencies in their area of concern have reviewed the
subject petition and recommended approval with thp fOllowing stipulations:
1-,
r---)
r
~..(...
.. '(....~
~ . _._. - --"~"-'-'--
"~.'..._.
~.. ~~
:j/
.~'
L':,'.:l
L]
July 29. 1980
1. Final plans for sewage tre3tment site be brought
back to EAC for review prior to the issuance of
any building permit. (EAC)
2. Comply with fire codes and hydrants. (EMFO)
3. Construction of 6' weir with elevations set at
4.5 and 2' wide bleed down notch set at 3.5.
4. Surface area of lake and ditch at elevation 7.0
shall be 1.1 acres.
5. Maximum discharge from site shall not exceed 4.5
c.f.s. for 25 year 24 hour storm.
6. Top of bank for lake and ditch shall be fflled to
a minimum of 7.0 on north bank and around sewage
treatment plant.
7. Minimum side slope on lake and ditch shall be 4.1
and shall be sodded.
8. A~ditional ~torage shall be provided south and
east of the most easterly building.
9. Detailed site drainage plan shall be submitted to
County Engineer for review and approval prior to
issuance of any permits.
10. Left turn storage lanes not less than 75' in length,
plus taper. (Traffic Planner)
11. DER permits required on laundry, wastewater and water.
Separate approval on swimming pool from HRS. (Health)
Ms. Layne reported that the CAPC has recommended approval, subject to the
above refercnced stipulations and the following three stipulations:
1. Maximum height of structures will bc two (2) living
f1 oors.
2. Site development shall be completed within twenty-four
(24) mo"ths.
3. PUD approval shall be su~ject to CAPC review if site
development fs not completed within twenty-four (24)
months after rezoninq of property.
The petitioner, Bruc~ Green, stated that he agrees to all the above-
referenced stipulations. In answer to Commissioner Archer, Mr. Green said
that. although there will be an on-site manager at all times within the
proposed dpvelopment, to his knowledge there has not been a fonnal manage..
ment contract executed at this time. After a brief discussion regarding
the need for such a contract, Mr. Green stated that he would not object
to having such a contract approved by the staff, prior to the issuance of
any certificates of occupancy for the proposed development. Mr. Hopkins.
princip~l for the development, concurred. adding that there will be a resident
manager for the proposed development.
BOOK 054 fACE 99
'~~..
- >~':C~
;",V
'~
t-=-:t
~ii;~".
",...:t~..;;. "r.
. ..- ~
BOOK 054 PACE 100
July 29. 1980
Ms. Layne stated that this matter relative to an on-site manager can
also be included as an additional section within the PUD, and Commissioner
Archer agreed. however. he requested that this be a pre-requisite to the
issuance of the certificate~ of occupancy. thereby. offering the County
a form of guarantee that there will be proper management of the proposed
apartments.
Hearing that there were no registered speakers wiShing to address
the subject petition, Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner
Pistor and carried unanimously. that the publiC hearing be closed.
CormJi ssior,er Archer moved, seconded by Commiss ioner Wimer and
carried 411. with Commissioner Wenzel opposed, that, pursuant to staff
and CAPC stipulations, as well as the additional managerial contract
stipulation offered by Commissioner Archer and agreed to verbally by the
petitioner, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below be adopted
and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11; and, that the Petitioners Agree-
ment to staff and CAPe stipulations be accepted.
ORDINANCE 80 - 56
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, TilE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR TilE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COASTAL AREA
PLANNING DISTRICT BY N1ENDING THE ZONING
ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-25-6 BY CHANGING TIlE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM GRC GENERAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL & RM-1 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY
'1'0 PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPl-lENT ON THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: NAPLES GROVE
& TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO.2, LOT
104 AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
*
*
*
*
'/Ii
*
*
*
'"
r-"'l
r- --J
,
,J/
;.'~.....-'.
I--?~
I,
I,
I '
I
i
I
I
I
r-
'1
BOOX
054 PACE 102.
July 29. 1980
ORDINANCE NO. 80-57, RE PETITION CP-SO-5C, ROLLIE RICE FOR ncc, APPROVING
A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE AMENrMENT FROM 0-6.22 TO RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE
USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 11, T5IS. R26E (GRAN PROPERTY) - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Nl,ples Daily News on June 27.
1980. as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk. public
hearing was opened to consider Petition CP-BO-5C, requesting a Comprehensive
Land Use Amendment from 0-6.22 residential land use to recreational open
space land use, for property owned by the Board of County Commissioners
located in Section 11, T5IS, R26E.
Planner Lee Layne presented Petition CP-80-5C. and pointed out the
general location on an overhead map. She referred to the subject property
as the Gran site, and said that the purpose of the petition is to reconnend
an amenJment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in order to make use of
this property as part of the Recreational Element of the Comprehensive
Plan. She explained that the Comprehensive Plan does show the subject
land, comprised of 60 acres. as a future corrmunity park site; that Objective
2(f) of the Recreatfonal Element encourages shared capabilities and coopera-
tion between public and private sectors for planning. development and
operation and maintenance of recreatfonal resources in the County, and. that
this is a joint petition by the County and the Model Aircraft Flying Club.
Ms. Layne stated that the County plans to develop 30 of the 60 acres with
the aircraft club using t~e remainder of the land.
Ms. Layne said that the staff and the CAPC recommend approval of the
subject petition.
Hearing that there were n0 registered speakers who wished to address
thr ~ubjp.ct petition, Conmissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Pistor and carried unanimously 5/0, that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
carried unanimously 5/0, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below
be adopted and entered into Ordinance nook No. 11.
ORDINANCE 80 - ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 79-32,
TilE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA BY AMENDING TIlF. T,AND USE ELEMENT
WORK STUDY AREA MAP NUMBER 4 FROM RESI-
DENTIAL 0-6.22 TO RECREATION OPEN SPACE
ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
PART OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 AND PART
OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW'l/4 OF SECTION 11,
TS1S, R26E, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
r-!
'---1
.~"
~.
";V
- -" ----.- '.-".- -----',---'--
""1" '<:~
i.\...~
L_J
CJ
C...J
July 29. 1980
ORDINANCE NO. 80-58, RE PETITION R-80-12C, ROLLIE RICE FOR BCC APPROVING
A REZONING FROM "A" TO "ROil FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 11. T51S. R26E -
ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
June 27, 1980. as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-80-12C. requesting
a rezoning from "A" Agriculture to "RO" Recreatfonal Open Space. for property
owned by the Board of County Commissioners. located in Section 11. T51S. R26E..
Planner Lee Layne stated that the subject petition is a companion to
CP-80-5C, previously acted upon by the Board. She said that the purpose of
the petition is to allow for the development of this land for a park site; and,
that the subject petition has been reviewed and recommended by all Coun~J
agencies for approval with the following stipulation:
1. Water and sewer, including toilets from approved sources.
required - (Health).
Ms. Layne stated that the CAPC has recommended approval subject to the
aforementioned stipulation also. as has the staff.
Hearing that there were no registered speakers who wished to address
the subject petition, Commissioner Archer moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Pistor seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried
unanimously 5/0. that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below. be adopted
and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11.
OROINANCE 80 - 58
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, TilE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCOHPORATED AREAS OF THE COASTAL AREA
PLANNING DISTRICT, BY AMENDING MAP NUMBER
51-26 BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPER'l'Y FROM "A" AGRICULTURE TO "RO"
RECREATION OPEN SPACE: PART OF THE NW
1/4 OF TilE SE 1/4 AND PART OF THE NE 1/4
OF TIlE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T51S, R26E,
AND BY PROVInINS AN EFFECTIVE DATE
MOK 054- PACE 103
_._"-- .,~........
;:',li5~r..'
. ~!.'I: -- _.-
BOOK 0S4 rACE 104-
July 29. 1980
ORDINANCE NO. 80-59 RE PETITION CP-80-9C. APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE lANO USE PLAN FROM AGRICULTURE LAND USE TO LOW DENSITY
0-2 UNITS PER GROSS ACRE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN
SECTION 36. T46S. R28E (IMMOKALEE) - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News
on June 27. 1980. as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk. publ ic hearing was ol.ened to consider Petition CP-80-9C.
filed by the County Planning Department requesting an amendment to the
Comprehensive land Use Plan from Aqriculture land use to low density 0-2
units per gross acre residential land use for property located within
Section 36, T46S, R28E, on Lake Trafford Road and west of Little LeaQue
Road in Immokalee.
Planner ~ichard HenderlonQ explained that the subject petition is
being presented to provide for the identification of land surroundinQ
Immokalee for low residential land use; that under the present Land Use
Plan, there is no such designated land within Work Study Area 5, other
than Corkscrew Island and Golden Gate Estates; and, that this rezone will
provide for a low density residential land use in an area that is primarily
a rural residentfal area.
Mr. Henderlong explained that one of the thinQs that the Planning
Department failed to rec0Qnize when preparing the Comprehensive Plan was the
need for lower density rural use, therefore. the request for such a land use
designation i~ being made today. He said that the subject area is appropriate
for this type of land use because of the tract sizes; the general location
relative to other low density residential lands; and because the subject land.
comprised of approximately 120 acres. will provfde a buffer between larger
areas of agricultural use and more intense residential land uses.
Mr. Perry Collins, resident of Immokalee. asked the Board if he would
still be permitted to farm the eight acres of land he purchased within the
subject area before the Board today for rezoninQ. if the Agricultural land
use were to be changed? Mr. HenderloQg explained that the property in 4uestion
is still zoned IIA_2" which allows f:nning; only the land use will be chanQed;
the zoninq will not be affected by the subject petition.
Mr. Henderlong clarified that the prOblem in the past relative to the
~llhj,.t;t lands. has been that the IIA_2" Zonin!) District permits one mobile
home on 1~ acres. however the present land use designation requires 5 acres
of land for one mobile home.
r-----l
r~
-1
r
-.". -
.....1.-
.~ .'
cn-
',M."
..." -..
:,,~-~ '
- - ----. - :./<17-
..
L__J
r '-'J
r_"_J
July 29. 1980
Mr. Dale Condy, resident on little League Road, addressed the Board in
opposition to the proposed rezoning. citing traffic problems relative to the
conditions of Little League Road, and the lack of maintenance of that road
as his concern. ~~ said that he feels that if more homes are encouraged
fn the area. the added traffic will deteriorate this road even more, and
that up to this time. there has been a problem getting any repairs or
maintenance on the road completed on the part of the original owner who
has sold the parcels of land along Little League Road. Mr. Condy said that
Doug McGoon, the man who subdivided the land some five years ago, promised
to pave the road; however. this has never been done. He said that this is
a private road, and it is not being maintained at all.
During a discussion regarding the condition of little League Road,
Commissioner Brown asked County Engineer Clifford Barksdale if Mr. McGoon
has ever been told to complete the road? Mr. Barksdale stated that, at one
time. Mr. McGoon was furnfshed a list of the ner.essary things that had to be
completed on the subject road before the County could accept the Road, and
Commissioner Brown emphasized the fact that the maintenance of a private road
is not a County responsibility. Mr. Condy said that his objection 1ies in
the fact that he feels that until such time as the road is properly repaired
and maintained there should not be any additional homes or trailers allowed.
The discussion covered the need to have the subject property owners petition
the County to bring the road up to standards, and Mr. Condy explained that
the present property owners probably could not afford the relative costs
involved at this time.
Another topic of discussion was whether or not the IAPC has recommended
approval of the subject petition. and Mr. Henderlong said that the CCPA recom-
mended approval. and the IAPC is represented in the CCPA. He said that the
IAPC has not approved the petition as a separate body. and that they are not
required to do so. When asked by Commissioner Wimer if any members of the
IAPC were in attendance at the CCPA meeting. during which this petition was
recommended for approval, Mr. fienoerlong answered negatively.
800K 054 PACE 105
"'-~~"--" --:-:--
',". . "p
:,;~~..--
.-" ,.::.. ~., _~""""...aI
:."~
BOCK
054- PACE106
July 29. 1980
Durin~_~iscussion of the reasons for the request for a change in
the land use and the interested parties or agencies that are behind the
request. Mr. Henderlong stated that the Planning Department acted in
part, under instructions from the BCC. specifically the 6/17/80 meeting. when
BCC instructed the staff to amend the Land Use Plan in order to permit mobile
homes on 1~ acres of land in the subject area. He said that this directive
resulted from the BCC issuing a temporary permit to store two mobile homes
on 2~ acres for Mrs. Hazel Sallee. within the area being recommended for
a land use amendment. Mr. Henderlong said that at the time Mrs. Sallee
approached the BCC, staff agreed t.hat this was a problem area; that people
were putting mobile homes on 1~ acres; and the BCC directed this be studied
regarding this type of use. Mr. Henderlong further stated that he has been
in contact with the Chairman of the IAPC. and that he is in complete agree.
ment with the proposed land use amendment.
Mr. Bob Olsen, representing Immokalee Funds for Humanity, a non-
profit corporation, addressed the Board in favor of the proposed land use
amendment. He explained that his organization purchased five acres of land
in the subject area, and that at that time. he was told by the developer
Doug McGoon that three houses on an acre was permissable. He said that at
this time his organization has three homes built on an acre, and plan to
build an additional seven houses on the five acres. He said that Immokalee
Funds for HUOlanity is building these homes in order to offer low cost
housing to low income people. and that this organization is in hopes of
seefng the prcposed land use approved.
Comm'issioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried
unanimously. that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Brown moved. seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried
unanimously 5/0, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below be adopted
and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11.
ORDINANCE NO. 80 - ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 79-32,
TilE COMPREHENSI'/E PLAN FOR COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE LAND
USE ELEMENT WORI~ STUDY AREA MAP 115
FROM AGRICULTURE LAND USE TO LOW DEN-
SITY 0-2 UNITS PER GROSS ACRE RESIDEN-
TIAL LAND USE ON THE FOLLOWING DE-
SCRIOCD PROPERTY; A PARCEL OF LAND IN
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND
THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWN-
SHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, AND BY
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
,-1
-1
- ~... - -- ----;-- ..
:' :-i:iI! .. ',II
..;..,.
. .
, .,.:,. ,
. .."rr;.
L-~~]
July 29. 1980
PETITION NZ-80-5C. AMENDING THE "ST" REGULATIONS AND EXCLUDING CERTAIN
MANGROVES AND SlIBMERGED LANDS FROM TOR ELIGIBII.ITY - DENIED
( -__J
r ]
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News
on July lO. 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication on file
with the Clerk, public he~ring was opened to consider Petitfon NZ-80-
5C, amending the "ST" Regulations by removing mangroves and
submel'ged lands below the 2 foot NGVD from the "ST" designation and
by excluding tnese areas from being eligible for TOR's.
Community Development Administrator Terry Virta stated that the
proposed amendment was prepared at the direction of the Board in
April of 1980; that the CAPC has recommended denial of the proposed
amendment because it was felt that these areas should remafn under
local control and not depend on the state or federal levels to guarantee their
nondevelopment. Chairman Wenzel stated that the state does not have the control
that the County once thought they have over these types of lands, and that he
concurs that these lands should remain under local control. Mr. Virta stated
that such is the staff's position also.
Mr. James Vense., re~rcsenting the Deltona Corporation, spoke
in favor of denial of Petition NZ-80-5C. He cited the many reasons
the present Ordinance is effective, and referred to it as a "model
ordinance" for many other agencies. Mr. Vensel stated that the present
Ordinance is an instrument by which public ownerShip of sensitive land
is carefully and effectively protected, and also protects against the
legal question of "taking" of lands from individuals. by allowing for
the TOR process.
Mr. Bill Blackwell. representing Collier Company, spoke in favor
of denial of the subject petition, citfng what he termed were areas in
the proposed amendment that were contrary to the Comprehensive Plan;
areas that were too vague; and areas that might open up a lot of legal
questions as it is written. He stated that the present Ordinance al-
lows for local control. and that. ill the case of environmental sensitive
lands. this is the optimum kind of control for protection in perpetuity.
Commissioner Wimer stated that he concurs with the premise that
local control is optimum. however. he feels that the real problem that
has arisen in the past had to do with TOR's to non-contiguous lands.
He said that there have never been prOblems related to public owner-
BOal(
054 PACE 107
U' :'.'
._~"~
-"', ',,-- - -'...y;
.'-.. If.. .",'
.wt!o
ROOK
054 PACE108
July 29, 1980
ship of sensitive land, ratller. there have been problems relative to the in-
creased density in the neighborhood resulting from the TOR process. Mr. Black-
well said that as he understands the process, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
dictates the density of lands. and the TOR process cannot be used to raise the
density of lands ani higher than what is dictated within the Plan. He said that
applicable zoning also 1 imits density, and that transfer of development rights
to upland areas does not preclude the limiting of density through these regulations.
He said that there is no licensing from creating unlimited density through
the TOR process. Chairman Wenzel concurred, adding that one can only tr~nsfer
development rights up to the limited density of the area being transferred to.
Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner
Pistor seconded the motfon which carried unanimously.
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor anrl carried
unanimously 5/0. that Petition NZ-80-5C be denied.
ORDINANCE NO. 80-60 RE PETITION NZ-80-6C, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
BY CHANGING THE OFF-STREET PARKING FOR VARIOUS USES AND AMENDING THE
DEFINITIONS SECTION TO INCLUDE SUPERMARKETS AND SHOPPING CENTERS-ADOPTED
Legal notice having been pUbliShed in the Naples Daily News on July 10. 1980
as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed wfth the Clerk, public hearing
was opened to consider Petition NZ-80-6C, filed by the Planning Department.
requesting an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by Changing the off-street
parking for various uses and amending the definitfons section to include super-
markets and shopping centers.
COTrl1lunity Development Administrator Terry V;rta explained that there is
inadequate parking facilitie~ requirements within the Zoning Regulations as
they are written at this time, and that staff prepared a report which was work-
shopped with the CAPC regarding this problem. He said the CAPC asked the
staff to prepare an ordinance and return for their review; the CAPC held their
public hearing to review the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and
are recommending approval of the proposed amendment to the 80ard.
Mr. Virta briefly outlined the impact of the proposed ordinance, explaining
that two areas will be affected; 1) Commercial development. 2) Multi-
family development. He said that the commercial development area will include
definitions of shopping centers and supermarkets as well as increase the require-
ments for parking for these types of uses; shopping centers will be required to
furnish one parking space for every 175 sq. ft. of floor area; and. supermarkets
will have to provide one parking space for every 125 sq. ft. of floor space.
(-1
'1
'.?'.'~.
" ."j;II,
u
.~~"",:-,
J" . . ~ ~'rt ,
r. _ ._1
f. ___]
r u:1
July 29. 19aO
Mr. Virta said that in the area of multi-family development, the requir'ement will
be increased from the present l~ spaces for each unit to 2 spaces per each unit
for the first 50 unfts, with a reduction to l~ spaces ~er unit for all one-
bedroom and efficiency apartments over that first 50; all apartments with two-
bedrooms or more will remain at the 2 spaces per unit requirement.
Mr. Virta added that there will also be a proviso whereby the developer
will be given the alternative of reservfng portions of the required parking areas
in the form of a landscaped area. until it is needed. provided that the intended use
can demonstrate that there is no immediate need for the added parking spaces.
Commissioner Pistor moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner
Archer seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried un-
animously 5/0. that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below. be adopted and
entered into Ordinance Book No. 11.
ORDINANCE 80 - ~
AN ORDIIlANCF. AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30 THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
COASTAl. AREA PI.ANNING DISTRICT DY AMENDING
SECTION 3, DEFINITIONS; SECTION 18, O.F-
STREET PARKING AND OFF-STREET LOADING; SF-C-
TION 2/., PLANNlm UNIT DEVI-:LOPMENT DISTRICT;
SECTION 33, CC-CONVENIENCE CO~ll1ERCIAT, DIS-
TRICT; SECTION 34, ORC-GENERAL RETAIL CON-
UEIlCIAT.i S~:CTION 37. A-AGRICULTUHE DISTRICT;
SECTION 38, E-ESTATES DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATF..
ORDINANCE NO. 80-61 RE PETITION NZ-80-8-C, AMENDING SECTION 5-1 OF PELICAN
BAY PUD TO ALLOW GARDEN APARTMENTS IN GROUP 2 SECTION-ADOPTED
legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on July 10.
1980, as evfdenced by ^ffidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public
hearing was opened to consider Petition NZ-80-8C. amending Section 5-1 of
the Pelican Uay PUD to ullow for garden apartments in the Group 2 Section.
Planner Lee Layne explained that the change in the PUD for Pelican Bay
that is being requested will allow for no increase in the density nor in
the height within the Pelican Bay Development. She said that there is also
a request that certain language relative to flood elevations that were not in ef-
fect at the time the PUD was adopted be incorporated in the PUD document, adding
that the staff and CAPC recommendation is for approval.
800K 054 PACE 109
'vi
~~, ...
. .. -":(~:.::--~i}j"-
BOOK 054 PACE 110
July 29, 1980
Hearing that there were no registered speakers who wished to address
the petition. and that Messrs. Turner. Dillon, and Obley, from the Pelican
Bay District were present for any questions. Commissioner Brown moved to close
the public hearing. Commissioner Archer seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
Commissioner Brown moved. seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried
unanimously 5/0. that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below be adopted
and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11.
ORDINANCE 80- 61
AN ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCE 77-18, THE PELICAN
BAY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT. BY AMENDING
SECTION V TO PERMIT THREE STORY MUlTI~FAMILY RESI-
DEr;TIAL STRUCTURES ON GROUP 2 PARCELS AND BY PRO-
VIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE 80-62 RE PETITION R-80-l0C, BRITISH. FRANCO, CANADIAN, CORP.
APPROVING A REZONING FROM "MHRP" TO "PUD" ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 33.
TSOS, R26E, - ADOPTED:..PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT TO STIPULATIONS ACCEPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on June 27.
1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication ffled with the Clerk. public
hearing was opened to consider Petition R-80-10C, as filed by British, Franco.
Canadian. Corporation, requesting a rezoning from "MHRP" Mobile Home Rental
Park to "PUD" Planned Unit Development, on property located in Section 33. TSOS.
R26E. on the northeast side of Barefoot Williams Road. south of US 4l.
Planner Lee Layne pointed out the general location of the s~bject property
on an overhead map and said that the proposed development is Immediately abutting
the Hitching Post travel trailer section.
Ms. Layne explained the purpose for the rezoning is to develop a 157 unit
condominium project. She said that the petition has been reviewed by all County
agencies and is being recommended for approval with certain stipulations as
follows:
1. Central water and sewer required. (Health)
2. Return for review by EAC if there are major changes in the
PUD: remove language concerning "tenative site plan" on page 5. (EAC)
3. Detailed site drainage plan and cal~ulations shall be submitted to
the WMAB for approval prior to any construction beginning on the site. (WMAB)
r-----1
r
I
~;,).A
i
L__J
L.)
July 29, 1980
4. No objection from the School Board.
5. Comply with fire codes and fire hydrants. (ENFD)
6. Proposed new road connecting the project to US 41 shall be completed
and available to traffic before any CO's are issued; its intersection
with US 41 shall be at an existing or FOOT approved new median opening.
The developer shall, subject to FOOT approval. provide on US 41 a right
turn deceleration lane. a left turn storage lane and the new median
opening if required. (Traffic Planner)
7. All parking provided along the main loop road shall be at a 90d angle
with an aisle width of not less than 24'. (Traffic Planner)
8. Certain amendments to PUD document.*
*These amendments have been incorporated within the document as outlined within
the Executive Summary (Staff Report, pages 3 & 4).
Ms. Layne reported that the CAPC has recommended approval subject tn staff
stipulations outlined above. including a waiver of the point system concerning
the County Park system since the developer is providing amenities usually found
in a neighborhood park.
In response to Commissioner Wenzel, Ms. Layne stated that the proposed con-
dominium project will not change the density of the subject area; there are 157
mobile hnmp~ ~llowpd under the present zoning.
Commissioner Archer asked about the condition of Barefoot Williams Road,
where the proposed project is to be constructed? County Engineer Barksdale and
Ms. Layne reported that the subject road is paved to near the mid-way mark of the
subject property. Mr. Barksdale said that there is still a problem during the
wet season along the subject road, however, he does not believe that the proposed
project will have any affect on the road because the main access to the proposed
project will be U.S. 41. He said that the developer is not required to pave
Barefoot Williams Ro~d, because the road is paved up to and including the point
of access along this road at this time. Commissioner Arc~er stated that he is
concerned that the Board has approved rezoning and PUD's in the past. and a
situation aris~s later, where the residents in these various developments have to
bear the cost of road surfacing. etc. He said that he is in favor of having the
developers be responsible for the roads that will benefit their projects. at the
time of construction. After Ms. Layne explained that this matter w~s not brought
up during the CAPC hearing. and that the traffic planner did not deem it necessary
in his review of the project, Commissioner Archer asked Mr. Pattison. representing
MOX 054- PACf11i
-'~..."--."" i/
:."~~e. ",
':':~1
..... ~
~.r
800:< 054 PACE 112
July 29, 1980
the developers. if they would agree to pave Barefoot Williams Road from the
point of access, where the road is paved to now, on through to the end of the
subject property? Upon discovering that Mr. Pattison was not present at this
time, and after Commissioner Pistor stated that he was very much in favor of
this, Chainnan ~/enzel continued the discussion to later during the meeting.
Later during the meeting Mr. Pattison approached the Board to answer their
questions regarding the paving of Barefoot Williams Road. Commissioner Pistor
asked Mr. Pattison if the developers for the project regarding the subject
petition would be willing to pave Barefoot Williams Road to the end of their
property 1 ine? There was some further discussion regarding the responsibil ity
for paving the subject road, specifically, what the County's responsib:.,cy is
for this paving, during which Mr. Pattison said that although he could not
answer the question, his clients have been willing to cooperate with all the
stipulations posed by the County thus far. Mr. Pattison asked if the County
is responsible for maintenance of this road beyond the point that is presently
being maintained? County Engineer Barksdale explained that while Barefoot
Williams Road is a County maintained road. there are no immediate plans for
resurfacing that portion ~hich is not presently paved. He said that he feels
it would only be fair that the County prepare the base for resurfacing that
road from the point where it is not paved to the end of the subject development.
then. the developer should be responsible for the actual paving.
Commissioner Archer asked Mr. Pattison if he would agree to having this
become part of the motion for the approval of Petition R-80-10C, and therefore.
the developer would be responsible for only the paving. and the County will
prepare Barefoot Williams Road up to the limerock for the resurfacing? Mr.
Pattison replied that that was acceptable.
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried
unanimously, that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Archer moved that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled
below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11. with the stipulation
that the developers pave Barefoot Williams Road after the County has prepared
C'
'I
. 8t/:,,(~:~ ,.J!
..;~~..
,...-' . ,.
..... .'r,'
,. . . ..r,. . ,.~
J
[__:.J
July 29. 1980
that road for resurfacing. from the point at which the road is not paved,
through the end of the subject project's property and that the Petitioner's
Agreement to CAPC stipulations be accepted; Commissioner P1stor seconded the
motion which carri~d unanimously 5/0.
ORDINANCE 80 - 62
/1'1 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, TilE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR TilE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COAST1\L AREA
PLANNING DISTRICT BY AMENDING TilE ZONING
ATLAS MJ\p NUMBER 50-26-8 BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM. "MHRP" MOBILE
HOME RENT1\L PARK TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ON TilE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY:
SOUTH OF US ~l ON THE EAST SIDE OF BARE-
FOOT WILLIAMS ROAD IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,1\ND BY PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOOK 054 fACE 113
-w;--- -
... .' . ~', "..~ ',: '
..:';" . '\4..........- ",'~.1.IJ,""!JJ'
..'::0"."')" ,',' ',;;.:~:'j.N.
~".
,;~\~:.
L_.~
,.____]
July 29, 1980
ORDINANCE NO 80-63 RE PETITION R-8Q-13C. PHIL CUBINE REPRESENTING OVER
50% OF PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED ON MYRTLE LANE RE REZONING LOTS 1 THROUGH
17. BLOCK A AND LOTS 1-21. BLOCK B. MYRTLE COVE ACRES - ADOPTED
Legal notice havfng been publfshed in the Naples Daily News on June 27,
1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication on file with the Clerk. public
hearing was opened to consider Petition R-80-13C. as filed by Phil Cubine.
representing over 50% of the property owners located on Myrtle Layne, re-
questing a rezoning for Lots 1-22 Biuck A. and Lots 1-23, Block B, Myrtle
Cove Acres. from "RM-IA." Multi-family, to "RS-3" Single family.
Planner Lee Layne explained that a petition has been received, signed
by over 50% of the property owners along Myrtle lane. who wish to have their
area presently being u~ed as primarily single family homesftes, rezoned from
the multifamily zoning that exists to that of "RS-3". which precludes the
development of multifamily structures in their neighborhood. She further
explained that the area in question has deed restrictions that take precedence
over the present "mul tifamily" zoning and that same deed restrictions allow
for only single family homes in the area.
Ms. Layne reported that the CAPC feels that the present zoning is inap-
propriate and somewhat misleading, in that it allows multifamily construction
when the same property falls under the deed restrictions that only allow
single family home~; therefore, the CAPC recommends the requested zoning
change. Ms. Layne said that all the County agencies have reviewed the SUbject
petition and that there are no stipulations to same. She said that it is
staff's recommendation to approve Petition R-80-13C.
In answer to Chainnan Wenzel, the proposed zoning change \~ill decrease
the density of the properties in question.
Mr. Toby Carroll. representing Ray Smith, owner of property to be affected
by the proposed rezoning. addressed the Board in opposition to the inclusion
of certain properties within the requested rezoning. He said that hfs client
and another gentleman. Mr. Clarence Brown. owners of lots 18 through 22 in
Block A and lots 22 and 23 of Block B, re~Dectively. do not want their zoning
changed. Mr. Carroll stated that his client and Mr. Brown both intend to
&OOK 054 PAGE 1t5'
1_ --- - --./---
:\~".~---'_.'-'- ---
--/
'~OOK 054 PACE 116
July 29, 1980
attempt to have the deed restrictions on the subject properties lifted.
through the courts. He asked that the Board consider rezoning all of the
requ~sted property except those lots he has alluded to earlier. He stated
that Mr. Brown was present to make hfs objections known, if the Board
wishes.
i
I
'.
During a discussion regarding Mr. Carroll's request, Commissioner
Archer asked County Attorney Pickworth if there would be a problem in
approving the requested rezoning for the Myrtle Cove area. and leaving out
those lots alluded to by Mr. Carroll. Mr. Pickworth said that he does not
consider such action "spot zoning". Ms. Layne said that she and COl11l1unity
Development Administrator Virta have agreed that if the petitioners do not
object. that this might be a form of transitional buffering. from residential
to cOl11l1ercial to the east.
Mr. Pickworth said that as he sees it. what Mr. Carroll fs asking is
that the Board not put an additional hurdle in his client's path, and
he noted that regardless of what the zoning is on the subject properties,
if the deed restrictions are not set aside, then they will take precedence.
Mr. Carroll concurred, explaining that he wishes to have the property that
Mr. Smith and Mr. Brown own remain zoned as it is until such time as they
can come to the County for application for the type of zoning that they
fecI would be appropriate for those parcels of land; both Messrs. Smith and
Brown have no objections to the rezoning of the remaining properties within
Petition R-80-13C.
Mr. Phil Cubine. spoke in favor of the petition, and said that while
he understands the motivation of the two requests for exceptions. he would
have to leave that decision to the Board. He said that he is a fri~nd of
Mr. Smith and that the two are on opposite sides of the f~nce in this
issue. He added that he does not want to cause any financial loss to
anyone, but he would like to see Myrtle Lane remain as it is, Mr. :ubine
said that he would entertain a compromise and suggested that Lots 18 and
19 be rezoned, or something similarly worked out. This was not discussed
further.
. .JI
"~"'"
-. -'<J>'_
'!,-' 'fl.....:..
. .'
,J"
I __::_J
July 29. 1980
After a brfef discussion regarding the request to leave out the seven
lots owned by Messrs. Smith and Brown. Commissioner Brown said that he
feels that once the County attaches a zoning on property, it is difficult
to have it removed, and he favored leaving these seven lots out. Com-
missioner Wfmer said that if they were excluded at this time, and the
owners came back to the Board for an additional rezoning, the ~ppropriate-
ness of the zoning for those lots could be determined at that time. Mr.
Pickworth said that if this land were to be left out of the petition.
and the owners chose to bring them in for rezoning for a PUD, then, the
various buffers, etc. could be worked out at that time as stipulations
for that particular rezoning. lle further pointed out that historically,
the County has not leaned toward approvals for rezoning resulting in higher
density, as freely as they have leaned toward rezoning properties resulting
in lowering density; if the seven requested lots are now zoned single
family, then they would be asking to raise density when they come back.
Co~nissioner Brown agrr.cd.
Commissioner Brown motioned to close the public hearing. Commissioner
Archer seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Commissioner Pistor moved to accept staff recommendations and rezone
all of the lots mentioned within Petition R-80-13C to "RS-3". Commissioner
Archer seconded the motion, and asked that the record reflect that his
second is forthcoming only to get the question on the floor for a vote
because he believes that the seven lots should be left zoned as they are to provide
a buffer between single family and commercial uses. Commissioner Pistor said
that he does not feel that there is a need for all seven to remain as they
are.
Commissioner Wimer offered an amendment to the motion on the floor, that
the lots discussed earlier for exception from the petition (Lots 18 through
22, Block A. and Lots 22 and 23, Block B, Myrtle Cove Acres) be deleted from
the consideration at this time. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion.
Upon call for the question, the motion to amend the original motion offered by
Commissioner Pistor carried 3/2, with Commissioners Wenzel and Pistor votin9 in
opposition.
BOOX 054 PAGE ii1
.~
..--.---... -.-----..-.
ii
~ ;~., ----0\1\.
--1'
"
aOCK
054 PAGE 11.8
July 29. 1980
Chairman Wenzel called for the question on the original motion as amended
by majority vote. and the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below was adopted
with a 4/1 vote. with Commissioner Pistor opposed. and entered into Ordinance
Book No. 11.
ORDINANCE aD - 63
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COASTAL AREA
PLlINN ING DISTIUCT BY AMENDING MAP NO.
50-26-9 BY CHANGING THE ZONING FROM RM-1A
MULTI FAMILY TO RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY ON THE
FOLLOWING DESCRI13ED PROPERTY: BLOCK "A"
LOTS 1 THROlJGH 17, BLOCK "B" LOTS 1
THROUGH 21, UNIT ONE, MYRTLE COVE ACRES,
AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
*
*
*
RECESS - TIME 10:15 .AM. TO 10:20 A.M.
*
*
MASTER PLAN RE MENTOR PINES SUBDIVISION. SECTION 24. T48S. R25E, - APPROVED WITH
CERTAIN VARIANCES AND EXCEPTIONS
Legal notice having been publiShed in the Naples Daily News on July 11, 1980.
as evidenced by Afffdavit of Publicatfon filed with the Clerk, public hearing was
opened to consider Petition SMP-80-lC. filed by Donald Bellamy. requesting master
plan approval re Mentor Pines Subdivi~ion. Section 24, T48S, R25E.
Planner Lee Layne pointed out the general location of the subject property
as situated directly east of the terminus at the end of Mentor Drive in Willoughby
Acres.
Ms. Layne reported that the Subdivision Committee reviewed the subject
petition on May 21, 1980 and recommended approval with the following variances
and exceptions:
1. A twenty (20) foot pavement width with two (2) foot gutters
on either side in lieu of twenty four (24) foot pavement width
for the extension of Mentor Dr.
2. Exclusion of the required bicycle paths.
r---- 1
r -
:~.:;J/
-.:-.~.' - ..-- - ---
..
, .. .' .
. ','<<'~'
----.~.rr--
I.
i.
.J
July 29, 1980
3. Request an additional 135' variance from the 1000' maximum limit
on the length of a cul-de-sac street.
Upon explaining the reasons for the above referenced variances/exceptions.
Ms. Layne reported that the CAPC has recommended approval of Petition SMP-80-1C.
and is in accord with the three exceptions and variances. She noted that during
the CAPC public hearing there was some concern regarding the bicycle path ex-
ception; however. it was explained that there is sufficient room in the right-
of-way for construction of bicycle paths. if it is ever needed to connect with
paths in adjacent Willoughby Acres; there are no such paths within the Willoughby
Acres subdivision at this time.
In answer to Chairman Wenzel. Ms. Layne explained that there are presently
two plans submitted for the subject subdiVision; one for 16 lots, same complies
with the density requirements; and one plan that shows a reductfon to 8 lots.
because there are no waterlsewer hOOkups available. She added that the eight lots are
designed in such a way so as to allow for a division of each lot; therefore, there
could be 16 building lots when water/sewer hOOkups are available and septic tanks
are no longer required.
In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Ms. Layne explained that each of the proposed
8 lots are over 20.000 square feet, and if divided in the future, both resulting
lots will meet the requirements for the "RS-3" zoning. She concurred with
Commissioner Pistor. in that each prospective lot owner could sell ~ of their
lots in the future. if public waterlsewer hookups become available; each of the
R lots will have two laterals (lines) installed to facilitate public water/sewer
hookups in the future.
There was a brief discussion regarding the eventual dedication to the
County of the waterlsewer lines, and Mr. Bellamy, explained that in accordance
with the Ordinances of the County. before the subject subdivfsion can hook up
to public waterlsewer systems, dedication will be mandatory at that time.
H~aring that there were no registered speakers who wished to address the
subject petition. Comnlissioner Pistor moved. seconded by Commissioner Archer
and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed.
BOOK 054 PAGE 119
II
.:~.;;.
;'
_. .-...-.. ..._.. ..-.--------... ~.--'
-.
BOOK 054 PACE 120
July 29, 19BO
Commissioner Pistor moved. seconded by Commissioner Archer and carried
unanimously 5/0. that Petition SMP-BO-IC, requesting subdivision master plan
approval for Mentor Pines Subdivision be approved with the variances and ex-
ceptions outlined above.
PETITION R-80-9C, & PETITION CCCL-BO-I-C, RE REZONING REQUEST & VARIANCE FROM
THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE REQUEST FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS NAPLES
CAY-CONTrNUED TO 9/16/80
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News, on May 16. 1980
re Petition R-80-9C, and on June 1. 1980 re Petition CCCL-80-lC, requesting a re-
zoning and a coastal construction control line variance respectively, for property
located in Section 16. T49S, R25E. known as Naples Cay. a~ evidenced by Affidavits
of Publ ication pi'eviously filed with the Clerk. discussion took place regarding
the continuation of public hearings for these two petitions from June 17. 1980.
Durfng a discussion resulting from a request from Mr. Merrihue. of the
Collier County Conservancy. to have Petition R-80-9C and Petition CCCL-BO-IC
cOlltinued for 30 days to September 16, 1980. because certain infonnation regarding
these petitions is still forthcoming. Mr. Wafaa Assaad, representing the petition-
ers, John Pulling, David Jcnes. and Robert Benson, stated that he had no objections
to Petition R-80-9C ~eing continued. He did say that he wished to have the public
hearing opened for con5i~eration of Petition CCCL-80-lC, in order to proceed with
other permitting requirements.
Mr. Merrihue stated that he wished to have both petitions continued to allow
sufficient time for the Conservancy to complete a through investigation. Mr.
Bernie Yokel, also representing the Conservancy, asked for a continuance of both
petitions in order for the Conservancy to call their Development Review Committee
together. and make a thorough investfgation, and the tfme is necessary due to
summer vacations of this Committee.
Mr. Al MacIlwain. representing the petitions, stated that ~e has agreed with
Mr. Merrihue, to a 30 uays continuance for Petition R-80-9C, only if Petition
CCCl-80-lC. was discussed and voted upon today. He urged the Board to open the
public hearing re Petition CCCL-BO-IC, ~ecause there will be a lengthy delay, in
r-
.t~:t;'t~~~-~ ,,'
...#",'t:>
L ._._ J
July 29. 1980
that State approval is necessary for the variance of the Coastal Construction
Control 1 ine, as well as County approval. Ile asked for direction from the
Board, regarding the ~ubject variance, in order to eliminate further delays.
Mr. MacIlwain said that he considers further delays regarding Petition CCCL-80-1C
unnecessary because no construction can commence until the remaining petition
is approved. He reminded the Board that Petition CCCL-BO-IC, has been forwarded
by all relative County agencies, and after having been reviewed by those agencies
as well as the variolJS advisory boards, is being recommended for approval subject
to certain stipulations, by the staff.
There was further discussion regarding whether or not to open the public
hearings for Petitions R-80-9C, and CCCL-80-1C. during which Mr. Assaad explained
that he is in agreement to continuing the former, however, he wished the latter
to be heard today. He said that he does not feel that the continuance to
September 16, 1980 is fair to the petitioner regarding Petition CCCL-80-lC, because
the time loss prior to receiving State approval for the variance would cause a
hardship to the petitioners. He said that the developer wishes to use the six
weeks time to attempt to get the State approval for the Coastal Construction
Setback line. In answer to Co~nfssloner Wimer. Mr. Assaad said that the petitioner
could go on to the State for their approval, however. traditionally, County
approval has been obtained first. He said that the County's "No objection" would
be beneficial to the application at the State level.
County Attorney Pickworth asked Mr. Assaad if the County's refusal to hear
Petition CCCL-80-lC precludes the petitioner from submitting an application for
approval for the subject variance at the State level? Mr. Assaad answered negatively.
Mr. SChryver. attorney for the petitioners. stated that the problem is one of delay;
the application at the State level can be delayed because the State traditior~lly
waits to see how the County treats an application for such a variance before they
act on it; thus. the petitioners would like to have the Board vote on Pelition
CCCL-80-1C, so that the State will know how the County is going to act on the
request for the Coastal Construction Cvlltrol Line variance.
BOOK 054 PACE 121'
.v
~'~,;:':..""'~
..tt"
7',..,..:,~."."
:'.'" '~Ii..'"
.,....... "A
;.:"~-:..; .", ~.
BOO)(
054 PACE 122
July 29. 1980
Commissioner Archer asked Community Development Administrator Terry Virta
if the petitioners are in compliance to County regulations regarding their ap-
pl ication fOI' the subject variance. and Mr. Virta answered affirmatively. Mr.
Schryver asked Ms. Layne to check the County's ordinance and find out if County
approval is necessary prior to seeking State approval for such a variance to the
control line setbacks. Ms. Layne reported that after researching the matter,
it has been found that such is not required.
After a lengthy discussion regarding the continuance of Petition CCCL-80-1C.
along wfth the continuance of Petition R-80-9C, including the Conservancy's
position as explained further by Messrs. Yokel and Merrihue. and reasons for
opening the public hearing on CCCl-80-lC, as explained further by Messrs. Assa-A
Schryver and Macr1wain, and also upon hearing from Mr. Virta that the petitioners
are requesting the public hearing be opened on Petition CCCL-80-1C, based on the
staff's recommendation for approval of same petition, the discussion turned to
the lIlerits of independent review and decisions by the County, aside from State
review, as explained by County Attorney Pickworth. Mr. Pickworth stated that
County review of such requests for setback variances are to be independent and
that the State Law specifically states that County setback requirements are not
contravened by the State Law. The question is. said Mr. Pickworth. does the
County have adequate infonnation on which to make an independent review of the
request being made within Petition CCCL-80-1C.
After further discussion regarding what is being requested in the subject
pr.titions; the position of the Conservancy that additional time is required to
make a thorough study of the requested variance and the further urging by the
petitioners to open the Public Hearing for Petition CCCL-80-1C, as well as their
agreeing to continuing Petition R-80-9C. Chairman Wenzel asked for an appropriate
motion.
Commissioner Wimer moved to continue Petitions CCCl-80-1C and R-80-9C to
September 16, 1980; the petitioner be allowed to make application to the State
for the Construction Control Line variance; and. that the County send a cover
rp
(" '"
i/
,~~~~ '." .~~
L_.
J__:..J
July 29. 1980
letter to the State indfcating that the subject petitions will be considered
on September 16. 1980. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Commissioner'
Archer asked for clarification as to whether or not the motion includes both
petitions and if the County will indicate in the letter to the State that when
the final determination is reached by tha County that determination will be
forwarded to the State? Commissioner Archer concurred as did Commissioner
Brown.
Mr. Stephen Martin, spoke in favor of continuing the two subject Petitions.
Louise Polan, Virgfnia Brodiga~. and Bfll Spencer declined to speak as
long as the two petitions are continued.
Mr. Schryver stated that he wishes to have the record reflect that the ~~~on
for continuance was not made by the petitioner; that the petitioner has met all the
requirements for the public hearings to be opened today; and, that they have
agreed to a continuance on Petition R-80-9C. but, they wish to have the public
hearing opened re Peition CCCL-80-1C. He said that he respectfully submits to
the Board that the latter petitfon be heard this morning as the petitioner fs
entitled to the public hearing.
Upon call for the question. the motion to continue the public hearings for
Petitions R-BO-9C and CCCL-BO-IC, until September 16. 1980 carried unanimously 5/0.
PUBLIC PETITION BY M!l. & MRS. HANCOTTE- RE INTERIM ACTION PROGRAM AND REMOVAL OF
SANDBAGS FROM GOLDEN GATE ESTATES CANAL SYSTEM - NO ACTfON TAKEN
County Manager Norman noted prior to the Public Petition by Mr. and Mrs.
Hancotte. that the Golden Gate Estates Study Committee will be making their rec-
commendations to the Board relative to the subject matter on August 5. 1980.
Mrs. Joyce fiancotte stated that she is here today to ask the BCC to authorize
the complete removal of the concrete sandbags from the weirs in G01den Gate Estates
canals. She stated that she and her husband are afraid that the property in the
Estates will be flooded to a greater extent than last year if the sandbags are
not removed. She said that the Engineering Department and Mr. Yokel. representing
BOOK
054- PACE 123
II
-,.~
'800~ 054 PAGE 124-
July 29. 1980
the Conservancy, has stated that it would make no difference. during the
rainy season. whether or not the sandbags are in place; so. why not remove
them altogether?
Mrs. Hancotte stated that because the land in Golden Gate Estates is
private land, and not wetlands, nor public lands. it fs not the County's
business what the property owners do as long as no laws are violated. She said
that if the County claims "common good" as the reasons for the recent actions
taken in the Golden Gate Estates canal systems. etc. then, they should condemn
the lands, and purchase the lands necessary to protect the "common good". She
stated that if the County intends to flood the area, then, they should buy
the land and flood it; the landowners are guaranteed certafn rights to private
propertYi and. the people in the Estates area do not want the water table raised.
because they do not need it.
Ms. Hancotte claimed that everything the County has done or planned to do
regarding the Golden Gate Estates area, has been done in total disregard for
the private property rights afforded to property owners unde.' the Constitution
of the United States. She referred to "taking" property without due process of
law; the fear of property owners in the subject area of having no compensation
fOI' the loss of the use of their property; and. the fact that the people who
own land in th<: subject area feel that they are of minor importance. She said
that as property o\'mers of lands that ~1111 be affected, the people in the area have
the right to decide for themselves if they want 7-24 inches of water on their
property; and, as voters and citizens, they demand that the concrete sandbags be
removed permanently.
Chairman Wenzel asked County Engineer Barksdale if the flashboards on the
weirs in the Estates area canals are removed during the rafny months to allow
for drainage? Mr. Barksdale explained that there are such flashboards installed
in the sandbagged weirs; that there are presently a lot of weirs that have
deteriorated and are not too effective at the moment; and. on August 5. 1980.
the GGESC will be recommending the imple~entation of the Golden Gate Estates
Interim Action Program. He said that this program will call for most of the
sandbags being removed from the weirs; and, the majority of the weirs will have
r--1
(' '!
.J/
,~ . ~~~:~":
'---"i'~'.- --
,
1\
".}~i'~
'-".:.:"',.J.." '1
'I
f .,.nl
.I
July 29. 1980
new flashboard systems installed that will allow for more control than there is
presently with the sandbags. He recommended that the Board not take any action
at this time, and wait to hear the GGESC's recommendations on August 5, 1980.
In answer to Mrs. Hancotte, Mr. Barksdale stated that he did not know for
sure how many weirs in the subject canal system presently have removable flash-
boards that are functioning, however. all of the weirs were constructed with a
"V-notch" system, origfnally; later, when the sandbags were installed on the
tops of the weirs, the same "V-notch" opening was also installed in that system.
He said the bottom of the "V-notch" system was subsequently filled with con-
crete bags. but the tops of the weir systems still have "V-notches". Mrs. Hancotte
said that she personally has photographed each of the twelve weirs in the sub.~--~_
canal system, and that only two of these twelve have removable flashboards
systems installed; the others have between 2 and 3~ feet of concrete sandbags on
the top of them. She said that according to the media, the GGESC's recommendation
is going to be to raise the weirs and sandbag systems even higher. Chairman
Wenzel asked Mrs. Hancotte to wait until August 5, and see what the recommendation
will be at that time.
Mr. Hancotte, stated that the Board has heard many Golden Gate Estate
residents make their fears known. relative to the Interim Action Program; the
Board has heard many people state what they want in the subject area; and today.
he is here to ask certain legal questions regarding the matter.
Mr. Hancotte questioned the legality of having no representation on any
committees dealing with the subject programs in the Golden Gate Estates area,
some being comprised of over 100 square miles; he noted that the GGESC never
notified his wife of their meetings, nor did they request any of the materials
they offered at the time the BCC directed them to do so; and, he questioned
whether or not the Board wishes to know the true facts?
Mr. Hancotte explained that there is already d health hazard resultant
from flooding in the subject area and septic tanks being backed up; he claimed
that this flooding is caused by the County; and he claimed that there has been
"trespassing" by the County by allowing this flooding onto property that is
MOK 054 PACE 12.5
J.I
::--~
. ,:"
BOOK D54 PACE 126
- .fiif... -. .
.1:-
.,..". .
;:~ "..-',
July 29. 1980
privately owned.
Mr. Hancotte also discussed apparent legal questions regarding the water
wells that are placed out in the Estates area, claiming that, based on con-
cultants direction and recommendations, the County has allowed private property
to be used for these wells rather than county-owned lands and dedicated easements.
Mr. Hancotte suggested that the entire matter be given to the County
Engineer. citing his competency as well as his staffs, and that the firm of
CH2M Hill should be relieved of this project.
Mr. Hancotte also asked that the canals in the Golden Gate Estates have
the sandbags removed, and be left alone. He claimed that the weirs. the sand-
bags. and the flashboards are all unnecessary. and are contrfbuting to floodfng
and relative problems as he alluded to earlier.
PUBLIC PETITION BY MR. SWITZER RE WYNDEMERE DEVELOPER'S WATER TREATMENT PLANT
AND PROPOSED LOCATION THEREOF - ACTION DEFERRED TO AFTERNOON SESSION
Mr. Wayne Switzer, 3007 70th Street S.W. addressed the Board in opposition
to the water treatment plant to be located directly behind his property. He
said that he is here today, rather than at a later date. because it has been
reported to him that Wyndemere i$ very close to the point at which they will
be applying for a building permit for the subject treatment plant, and he would
like to discuss this prior to that time to allow the Board time to review the
s i tua t i on.
Mr. Switzer asked that the following statement be entered into the record:
"This morning, I had an opportunity to meet with Mr. Berzon out in the
hall. Mr. Berzon said that he has heard that I have said that he has
been involved in some type of a cash kick-back or something along that
line. I don't know the exact wording. but. I want to tell you gentlemen
this; I have never said that about Mr. Berzon. I believe he is tellir.~
the truth, and. to the best of my knowledge, he has not been involved in
anything of that nature."
Mr. Switzer reported that it was not until heavy equipment began clearing
the subject property located behind his home, that he and other residents in the
area began questioning what was going on; they had no knowledge of the agreement
dated 2126/80, whereby the subject property was to become the site of a temporary
r--
r--q -j
jJ
~' .~
...it
...
"
,
~
I..j
t
f -.__J
July 29. 1980
package treatment plant for the Wyndemere development; nor did they know that
the land was to accommodate a ground storagelhigh service pump facility,
adequate to accommodat~ anticipated future ground storage of 2 mgd water. Mr.
Switzer said thai. he represcnts the surrounding neighborhood, and that they
feel that a plant this size represents something close to industriallheavy
usage of water. He ~aid the people in the immediate area are upset; that they
feel the petition that was before the Board was to reduce the PUD from 2000
units to 725 units, with a 27 hole golf course. and there was to be a water
treatment plant. Mr. Switzer said that under Mr. Krehling's plan, the original
PUD was to contain the plant; however, under the WyndemJre Development's PUD
petition there was to be a treatment plant located on a five acre parcel that
they also own, located ~ mile plus/minus away from the PUD, next to their sales
office. He said that it is his opinion that the location of the treatment plant
violates the concept of PUD's. Hc referred to the CAPe meeting of 9/20/79, and
their finding that granting the provisional use for the treatment plant would
not have any adverse affects on the public interest. He also referred to the
staff report re same provisional use, dated 9/l7/79. wherein staff recommended
that the provisional use location for the water treatment plant be approved
along with the other rezoning. He said that he finds this ridiculous, on the
basis that they needed water.
Mr. Switzer said that he does not believe the Board had the proper knowledge
on which to make a decisfon on the subject provisional use approval. and he read
a letter into the record, same letter being the legal notification regarding the
public hearing before the CAPC on 9/20/79, and he stated that he does not feel
the letter was clear in the manner in which the description of the proposed
petition for a PUD was outlined. He said that he reads the letter to mean that
the treatment plant was to be located on property within the PUD. not on a
separate parcel. He said that there was a notation that read "provisional use -
tract 7, Unit 29, Golden Gate Estates". He said that it was an ambiguous letter,
and the property owners within 300 ft. of the proposed PUD felt that the plant
was part of thp. PUD. lie said that because the neighborhood residents felt that
&OOK D54 PACE127
.......... . .
.).~~.-il-
aOOK
054 PACE 12.8
July 29. 1980
the eUD was acceptable. and would probably be an asset to the neighborhood.
they did not attend the publ ic hearing, because they were not aware that the
plant was to be outside the ~evelopme~t.
Mr. Switzer read a portion of a letter from another resident. Mr. Larry
Stevens, opposing the provisfonal use, and stating that the surrounding
property values will be depressed. with the treatment plant. in the subject
location. (behind Mr. Switzer's home).
Mr. Switzer read a portion of a letter fl'om Dr. Donald Wentzle, who is a
former owner of property now owned by Mr. Robert Madsen, who could not attend
today. The letter from Dr. Wentzle indicated that he also feels that he was
misled by the letter of notffication for the CAPC hearing regarding the treat-
ment plant's location. This letter also indicated opposftion to the plant
because of property devaluation.
Mr. Switzer said that Mr. Madsen wa~ unable to find out about the proposed
plans for the treatment plant that is located adjacent to the two lots that he
purchased from Dr. Wentzle, prior to his purchase, even though he came to the
courthouse complex and researched the matter.
There was a bl"ief discussion regarding an al ternative site for the plant.
during which Mr. Switzer noted that Mr. Fagan, representing the developer of
Wyndemere, has safd that a site next to the waste disposal system within the
confines of the PUD could be used, but that the cost of additional piping would
make it financially not feasible to do so.
Mr. Switzer also brought forth the fact that to his knowledge, Col. Jenkins.
of GAC, did not issue a permit and he does not believe the proposed deed re-
strictions of the property originally developed by GAC have been complied with.
He added that he cannot argue the legal aspects relative to deed restrictions,
however. he feels that the Board should be aware of them.
Mr. Switzer said that he feels the Board has been misled by not knowing the
!eelings of the community; and he has serious reservations as to whethe~ ur not
a water treatment plant for a PUD should be entitled to a provisional use permit.
He asked the Board to immediately take whatever action is necessary to prevent
I-J
r- 1
.','iiiK--;----- -. .
:~f"" .U
~ ~
:~-.."~
'. 'i'
I '
/.
I
I
k
l '
\
1
I
I
..
ti
.\
~I
J
.: I
~ __J
July 29, 1980
the water treatment plant facility from being built in the residential
neighborhood. He said that he believes that the representatives from
Wyndemere 3re planning to apply for building permits in the very near future.
He emphasized that time is of the essence and had the residents known of this
a long time ago, they would have opposed the plant befnre the CAPC. He claimed
that the misleading notification led to the lack of participation of the op-
position and said that he feels that the staff should have made the Board
aware that the residents of the community do not wish to have a treatment plant.
that is to serve a PUO, situated within their neighborhood instead of within
tha t PUD.
Chairman Wenzel stated that when this came before the Board, he thought
the treatment plant was going in within the Wyndemere property, and that the
raw water transmission station was going in up the road. He said that he
probably was neglfgent in not questioning the issue at the time it came before
the Board. but he thought Wyndemere had gotten permission from GAC and the
surrounding neighbors. He said that he did not object, because there were no
other Objections at that tfme. He said that he sees Mr. Switzer's point, and
that he agrees with him because he believes the notification shows that the
plant was to go on their own property.
Commissioner Archer moved that the Board instruct the Building Oepartment
not to issue any building permits with respect to the subject provisional use.
until the Boart. reconsidel's this matter and attempts to s01'le the problems with
the people from Wyndemere. He stated that he was not aware that the treatment
plant was not going to be located within the PUD, in the northeast corner, just
a s it was to be when the Kreh 1 i ng peop 1 e had the PUD drawn up. He sa i d tha t he
did not know this site, some one mile away. would be utilized. Commissioner
Pistor seconded the motion.
Peter Fagan, representing Wyndemere Corporation, spoke in 'Jefl!nse of the
Wyndemere Corporation's action. He said that the de"elopmerrt will be bene'i'icia1
to the entire neighborhood; that nothing was ever disguised; and the insinuations
to the contrary are false. He said that the County staff also did not attempt
to disguise anything and that they have done nothing that was not normal procedures
BOOK 054 PACE 129
. --.-.- -- If:
..- --'--..-.---.--.- -:-if-'--'-/
~j\'t,..
BO:lX
054 PACE 130
'''"
I
\
July 29, 1980
for the work in their respective positions. He said that at a previous ncc
meeting the original agreement was amended to take out the stipulation that
the subject property will become the County's and, in return for that, Wyndemere
agreed to pay for that lot in cash to the county within a sixty day period, in
order that some day in the future another site for possible ground storage
facilities could be purchased by the County with those funds. He said that
consequently, that site will only have a sn~ll tank and processing unft, which
will havp. no nofse. odor or unsightly problems. He said that it has been re-
designed; will be almost indistinguishable from the foilage when it is finished;
and that it will be raised some 14 feet off the ground, and will be aesthetically
pleasing. He said that it is supposed to be completely removed when the County
is prepared to service the subject area with water and sewer facilities; hope-
fully by 1984. He said at that time, the facilfty will be dismantled and the
lot sold as a single family lot.
When asked if he thought the notification re CAPC hearing was deficient. Mr.
Pickworth said that the only words that makes it misleading are the words describing
the location as "on the property known as Wyndemere". He further stated that
this above referenced passilge is contained within a paragl'aph; however, lower on
I
I'
the page. set out by itself, and underscored, is the passage as follows:
"Provisional use - tract 7, Unit 29, Golden Gate Estates:"
He noted that the latter is a significant notation, and not easily missed.
did say that there is obviously a contradiction within the letter, but one
He
"
cannot say that there was nothing in the letter to alert one to the fact that the
site in question would be discussed.
Commissioner Archer said that he found the letter confusing and that the
mention of the provisional use is unrelated to the previous paragraph about Wyndemere.
He said that he finds it misleading. and, if he were properly informed, he would
have voted against the provisional use.
There was some additional discussion regarrl;n~ the feaSibility of putting the
trpatment plant in Wyndemere; the need to take action today; and whether or not to
vote on the motion at this time, after which Commissioner Wimer moved to defer
action until after the noon recess, in order to give the Commissioners. the
r--"-J
.~.-
ii'
,~.,
--,1'f'.'
.- ~j,'
....1
l... J
( ....1
July 29. 1980
petitioner, and the representatives from Wyndemere time to study al tc'rnative actions.
Commissioner Archer seconded the motion. clarifying that the original motion
rcmain at bay until after lunch.
After further discussion regarding the various persons concerned. and their
feeling of'how this should be settled, and noting the lateness of the hour,
Chairman Wcnzel requested a vote on the motion to continue this until after lunch.
The motion to defel' the matter until after the recess carried 4/1, with ..
Commissioner PistOl' opposed.
*
*
*
RECESS - TIME 12:10 P.M. - MEETING RECONVENED AT 1:30 P.M.
AT WHICH TIME DEPUTY CLERK DAVIDSON WAS REPLACED BY DEPUTY CLERK BRENNEMAN
*
*
*
FURTHER DISCUSSION RE PROVISIONAL USE RE WYNDEMERE SUBDIVISION - NO ACTION TAKEN
PENDING FURTHER REPORT TO BE FORTHCOMING AUGUST 5, 1980
Chairman Wenzel recalled that, prior to the noon recess, a motion was made
and seconded that the Buiiding Department withhold Building Permits with reference
to the Wyndemere development's water plant. County Attorney Donald Pickworth
commented that he lelt constrained to advise the Board not to take such proposed
action because. other than the objections of the property owners. there has been
no new evidenc~ presented that would change the facts under which the use was
granted and he pointed out the possible legal ramifications involved. At this
point Commissioner Archer withdrew his motion.
Commissioner Wimer reported that during the recess he took advantage of
conferring with Mr. Peter Fagan. representing the Wyndemere developers, and called
upon him to reiterate to the Board the substance of their discussion. Mr. Fagan
said that since he was not aware that the matter was going to be addressed at the
meeting this date, he was unable to put together any information ~or presentation
to the Board. lie said that, if they could hold off on filing for pennits for one
week, the developers would unilaterally louk into the possibility, if feasible. of
moving the suhject treatment plant a;,J that an alternative of putting the plant
MOK 054 PAGE 1B1
t.~';J-
':11.
d
~,..~
./<'
BOOK
054 PACE 132.
on Tract 7. Unit 29 in Golden Gate would be set forth at the next Commission
July 29, 1980
meeting. He added that during the ensuing week the matter would be discussed
with the principles involved. and the County. and the possibility of moving
the site someplace else could at least be looked at in more detail.
Chairman Wenzel noted that it is not necessary to take action at the present
time and asked that Mr. Fagan report back to the Board directly or through
Attorney Pickworth, within a week.
ORDINANCE 80-64 RESCINDING ORDINANCE 80-46 - ADOPTED, REFLECTING CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY THE IAPC RE PROVISION OF BUFFER FOR RESIDENTIALLY-ZONED
AREAS WHICH ABUT COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Legal notices having been published in the Naples Dafly News and in the
Immokalee Bulletin on July 10. 1980, as evidenced by Affidavits of Publication
filed with the Cl~rk, public hearing was opened to consfder a proposed ordinance
rescinding Ordinance 80-46, that was adopted on May 20. 1980. which will reflect
the conditions of approval recommended by the Immokalce Area Planning Commission
which were deleted in the earlier ordinance.
Commurttty Development Administrator Terry Virta explained that the new
ordinance does not change any intent on the part of the Board of County Commissioners
but reflects certain conditions of approval as recommended by the IAPC. as follows:
1. The ordinance require yard setbacks to be provided by the property
proposed for rezoning which would abut existing commercial and
industrial zoned landj and
2. The ordinance apply to rezoned properties after the effective adoption
date of the ordinance and not to properties as are presently zoned.
As noted by County Manager C. William Norman, there were no persons registered
to address the matter. whereupon Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Brown and unanimously carried. that the pUblic hearing be closed.
Commissfoner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer alld unanimously
carried, that the Ordinance, as numbered and entitled below, be adopted and entered
into Ordinance Book 11.
C----l
(-'-')
".--. ~~---~...-.
I.~,~~~.~~~ll~itp,
.-.'-- ~._-_. ---~- - ---- --.._-~- -_. ~----- -....-
......."
'.." ..,-,..".. "'
.,: '., ~,fd
f' t <:,.,,' ,
\
,
i~
,
..
4
J
L_]
l 1
{ ___._.1
July 29, 1980
ORDINANCE 80 - ~
AN ORDINANCE A~lENDING ORDINANCE 7/.-1S, ARTI-
CLE V, GENETlAL PROVISIONS; ARTICLF. Xl, SEC-
TION 11.2, SINGLE FMIIT.Y RESIDENTIAl. DISTRICT;
ARTICU: Xl, SECTION 11.2.1, I-SF-]A, SINGLE
FA~III.Y RESIDENTIAl. DISTRICT; ARTICLE Xl, SEC-
TION 11.3, I-SF-2, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDF.NTIAL
DISTRICT; ARTICLE Xl, SECTION 11.4, I-SF-3,
SINGLE FAmLY RESIDENTIAl. DISTRICT; ARTlCI.E
XI, SECTION 11.5, I-SF-4, SINGI.E FAHILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SECTION
11.6, I-HF-l, SINGLE ~VD TWO FAHILY RESIDEN-
TIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.7,1-
~rF-2, Olffi, TWO AND HULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDEN-
TIAL DIt,TRICTj ARTICLE Xl, SECTION 11.8,
I -HF-3, mlLTIPLE FMIILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT;
ART! CLE XI, SECTION 11. 9, I -I1HSD, HOBILE HOME
SUnDIVISION DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SECTION
'.1.10, 1-~OlTT. ~IOBILE HO~ AND TRAVEL PARK
DISTRICTj ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.11, CO~rnw.R-
CIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.12,
I -C-2 COI1l1ERCIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI I SEC-
TION 11.13, I-C-3, CO~lI'lERCIAL-LIGIlT INDUS-
TRIAL DISTRICT; ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11.14,
I-C-4, Cmrnw.RCIAL-LIGHT Ih'DUSTRIAL DISTRICT;
ARTICLE XI, SECTION 11. IS, I-I INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT; RESCINDING ORDINANCE 80-46 IN ITS
ENTIRETY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE NO. 80-65 AMENDING ORDINANCE 80-48, WHICH REZONED LOTS 71-76 AND Lo'rs
88-93, PLANTATION ISLAND MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION, TO CORRECT A TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERPOR IN LEGAL DESCRLPTION - ADOPTED
legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on July 10, 1980
as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk. public hearing
was opened to consider a proposed ordinance amending Ordinance 80-48, which
rezoned Lots 71-76 and B8-93, Plantation Island Mobile Home Subdivision. to
correct a typographical error contained therein.
Planner Lee Layne explained that the typographical error in Ordinance 80-48
"
was contained in the legal description under Section One, inadvertently omitting
I
I:
H
I!
r
Lots 73-76 from the legal.
There were no persons registered to speak on the issue, whereupon Commissioner
Archer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously carried, that the
public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried un-
animously. that the Ordinance, as numbered and titled below. be adopted and entered
l.
jl
ii
"
i
~ .
Boall 054 rACE t33
~._.~.- --._... ...-
i ,~;.-,,;'cf'~ 1/
..~!'V...,,'_.~
"--- .,.----..-. -- --..--.----".-... - - -
.~.
~JI
800~ 054- PAGE 134.
July 29. 1980
into Ordinance Book No. ll.
ORDINANCE 80 - 65
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 80-1\0 WHICH
REZONED LOTS 71-76 and 88-93, PLANTATION
ISLAND FROM "RM-IA" NULTI F1\MILY 'ro "1-11150"
MODILE HOME SUBDIVISION TO CORRECT A
TYPOGRAPIIICAL EHROR IN SECTION ONE OF
ORDINANCE 80-48; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
OROINANCE AMENDING ORrINANCE 80-47. THE COUNTY'S PARKING ORDINANCE - ADVERTISING
~UTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 26, 1980
Commissioner Arch(~r moved, seconded by Commissioner ristor and unanimously
carried, that a proposed ordinance amendfng Ordinance 80-47, The County's Parking
Ordinance, be advertised for public hearing on August 26. 1980.
PETITION CP-BO-IIC, WAFAA ASSAAD REPRESENTING ROBERT TUYLS. REQUESTING A LAND USE
PLAN AMENDMENT FROM 0-6.22 UNITS AND COMMERCIAL .0 RESIDENTIAL 6.22-30 UNITS ON
PROPERTY IN Sl, T50S, R25E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER
9. 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried. that Petition CP-80-l1C. filed by Wafaa Assaad representing Robert Tuyls.
requesting a Land Use Plan amendment from Residential 0-6.22 Units and Commercial
Land Use to Residential 6.22-30 Units on property in Section 1, Township 50 South,
Range 25 East. between Davis Blvd. and Estey Avenue, be advertised for a public
hearing September 9, 1980.
PETITION R-80-23C. WAFAA ASSAAD REPRESENTING ROBERT TUYlS. REQUESTING REZONING
FROM "GRC" AND "RM-l" TO "PUD" ON PROPERTY IN Sl, T50S, R25E - ADVERTISING
AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 9, 1980
Commissioner Archer moved. secondeo by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried, that Petition R-80-23C. filed by Wafaa Assaad representing Robert Tuyls,
requesting rezoning from "GRC" and "RM-l" to"PUD" on property located in Section 1.
Township 50 South, Range 25 East. between [hI/is Blvd. and Estey Avenue. be
advertised for a public hearing on September 9, 1980.
(
II
;.,...
'" Jt;:':~
L
l___..~
L___ )
r__~ J
July 29. 1980
PETITION R-80-7C. R. C. HUNTER. REQUESTING REZONING FROM "A" AND "A-ST" TO
"CI" AND "CI-ST" FOR PROPERTY IN Sl1. T49S. R25E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED
FOR PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 9. 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that Petftion R-80-7C, filed by R. C. Hunter, request-
ing rezoning from "A" and "A-ST" to "CI" and "CI-ST" on property in Section 11,
T49S. R25E, on the west side of Airport Road. north of Pine Ridge Road,
be advertised for a public hearing on September 9, 1980.
PETITION R-80-22C. FRED J. MORRISON, REQUESTING REZONING FROM "MHSD" TO
"RM-l" ON PROPERTY IN SECTIONS 3 AND 10, T51S, R26E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED
fOR PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 9, 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried. that Petition R-80-22C. filed by Fred J. Morrison, requesting rezoning
from "MHSD" to "RM-l" on property located in Sectfons 3 and 10, Township 51
South, Range 26 East, east of SR 951 on Holiday Manor Drive, be advertised
for a public hearing September 9, 1980.
PETITION R-80-24C, KING'S LAKE, LTD., REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE KING'S
LAKE "PUD" BY MAKING MINOR LANGUAGE CORRECTIONS AND CHANGES - ADVERTISING
AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 26, 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and una1;mously
carried. that Petition R-80-24C, filed by King's lake. Ltd., requesting an
amendment to the King's Lake "PUD" , for property located in Section 7.
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, be advertised for a public hearing on
,
~
August 26, 1980.
,
~'~T.--
,,\r1'-':.-.,.~,~'I-"f.~
II
"';!'!':......
--...._-- ---~_._.
PETITION CP-80-10C, FRED G. STROM. REQUESTING AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND
USE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN Sl, T50S. R25E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR
PUBLIC HEARING SEPTtMBER 9. 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that Petition CP-80-10C, filed by Fred G. Strom,
requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Residential
6.22-30 Units land Use to Commercial Land Use on property located in
Section 1. Township 50 South, Range 25 East, located on the northwest
corner of Donna and Gail Blvds., be advertised for public hearing
September 9. 1980.
BOO~ 054 PAGE 135
~.
BOOK 054 PACE 136
July 29. 1980
I,
PETITION R-80-21C, FRED G. STROM, REQUESTING REZONING FROM "A" TO "PC" FOR
PROPERTY IN SI, TSOS, R25E - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING
SEPTEMBER 9, 1980
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that Petition R-80-21C, filed by Fred G. Strom.
requesting rezoning from "A" Agriculture to "PC" Professional Commercial
of property located in Section 1. Township 50 South, Range 25 East, located
on the northwest corner of Donna and Gail Blvds., be advertised for public
hearing September 9, 1980.
PETITION TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF UNITS 196 THROUGH 203 INCLUSIVE,
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AUGUS~. 1~30
Commissioner Archer movpd, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried, that consideration for the vacation of Units 196 through 203,
inclusive, in Golden Gate Estates, be advertised for a public hearing
August 26. 1980.
CREATION OF AUTO PANCH ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL, AND ACCEPTANCE AND RECORDATION OF QUIT CLAIM DEEDS FOR
RIGHT-OF-WAY ALON~ AUTO RANCH ROAD - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC
HEARING AUGUST 26, 1980
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by Comnissioner Pistor and unani-
mously carried, that the creatfon of the Auto Ranch Road Improvement District
and approval of the Preliminary Assessment Roll, be advertised for a public
hearing on August 26. 1980. and that two Quit Claim Deeds for right-of-way
along Auto Ranch Road be accepted for recordation.
."
."
."
."
."
."
."
r--- 1
"1'
-(
~"....-
.~~.. ' .' '::/1
"~:.C~t"
~. '_...~.:..-. .
.;~
July 29, 1980
CREATION OF THE BAY STREET AND MOST SOUTHERLY 270 FEET OF FERN DRIVE IMPROVE-
MENT DISTRICT. AND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - ADVERTISING
AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 26, 1980
,
,
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unani-
1110usly carried. that the creation of the "Bay Street and the most southerly
270 feet of Fern Drive Improvement District", and approval of the PrelimI-
nary Assessment Roll, be advertised for public hearing on August 26, 1980.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL TERM OF FIVE (5) YEARS AND RATE INCREASE FOR
IMMOKALEE GARBAGE FRANCIlISE AGREEMENT - ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED FOR PUBLIC
HEARING AUGUST 26, 1980; EXTENSION OF EXISTING FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO
QCTOBER I, 1980 - APPROVED
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried, that consideration of an additional five-year term and a rate increase
for the Immokalee Garbage Franchise operator, be advertised for a public
hearing on Au~ust 26, 1980.
At staff rcqucst, Commissioner Archcr movcd, sccondcd by Commissioncr
Pistor and unanimously carried, that the present Franchise Agreement be
extend~d to October I, 1980.
ORDINANCE 80-66 CREATING THE ~:OUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY OF COLLIER COUNTY.
FLORIDA - ADOPTED. RESOLUTION 80-130 DECLARING TilE NEED FOR A HOUSING FINANCE
AUTHORITY - ADOPTED; BOARD DESIGNATES FISCIlER, JOHNSON, ALLEN & BURKE,
INCORPORATEDISOUTHEASTERN MUNI~IPAL BONDS. INC. A~ UNDERWRITERS FOR AUTHORITY
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on July 10,
1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public
"
Ii
I
hearing was opened to consider a proposed ordinance creating the Housing
Finance Authority of Collier County, Florida.
County Attorney Donald Pickworth explained the actions to be taken by
the Board in order to facilitate the implementation of the Authority; i.e.
the adoption of an ordinance creating the Authority; the adoption of a
resolution declaring the need for such Authority; and the designation of
an underwriting finn therefor. Attorney Pickworth pointed out that it is
not the intent of the Program to provide for low-income housing and added
that a study must be done to identify specific needs.
~<.
,&t*~!. ..
, 'iI':'
';~"/"~
- _._-~----'"
,,,
BOO~ 054 rAGE 139
..........
~ . . .' '~. . .'. . " ~ '. . . I . ,
'~.. ","...... ... . ~ j or ~ . ...J-.... . It. '. ..... .
. . . . ."':!,
BOOK
054 PAGE 140
July 29. 1980
Mr. Earle Johnson expressed his concern over the proposed Program. citing
his past experience with Federal programs. Among Mr. Johnson's comments
were the fact that every time Federal authority is involved. local control is
lost. and. with the Federal Government controlling the interest rate, as Is
proposed, which is lower than the market, the taxpayers become involved since.
as he said, there is "no such thing as Federal subsidies". He urged the
Board to give serious consideration before creating a subsidized authority.
giving to the Federal Government controls which can probably never be gotten
back.
Attorney Pickworth assured Mr. Johnson that the subject Authority is not
a Federal authority and called upon representatives of the suggested under-
writers who were present to further explain the Program and possibly clarify
some misconceptfons.
Mr. Gary Akers, representative of Southeastern MuniCipal Bonds. Inc.,
concurred that the Program is not a Federal Housfng Authority. nor a Federal
Program; however, he said that he could not disagree with Mr. Johnson's comments
regarding the fact that it is a subsidized Program based on the sale of tax-
exempt securities which reduces revenue from federal Income Taxes to the
Federal Government. Mr. Akers explained the basic principles of the Program
which inclu~e the necessity for firmly establishing the need for same within
the County, commitments from lending institutions for their participation,
and interest on the part of investors for the purchase of the securities
thereby making mortgage monies available. Thel'e will be objections to the
Pl"ogram said Mr. Akers, but the advantages to the County will outweigh
those objections. It was also pointed out by Mr. Akers that any Obligations
involved will be the responsibility of the Authority and not of the County.
Mr. Johnson explained that he had been informed that the Program was
a Federal one and apologized for his misinformation; however, he said he
was still concerned over the trend away from the concept of supply and
dem.:ltld regulating interest rates and "gain urged the Board to consider this
aspect.
~.,-~'
',~ lit' '.
-. _.~ ~-- -
I
i.
r--'l
.' "'; ..~~, ",;:--~---';:~'-.
"tljQ...' ,... ~. ,'" . "~'. "
.:~-- -" ..,..
,_"lil__._.________
r
I
I
~
July 29. 1980
Clerk William Reagan noted that concern has been expressed on the part
of Controllers as to the effect a default on the part of the Authority
would have on a county's bond rating. Mr. Donald Burke. a representative
of Fischer. Johnson, Allen & Burke, Incorporated. addressed Mr. Reagan's
concerns by explaining that there are many safeguards buflt into the Program,
noting that the risks involved will be taken by the investors, and there will
be no darndnye to a county's reputation, nor to that of the Federal Govern-
ment, in the event an Authority defaults.
;
I,
, ,
Mr. Bob Abbott. County resident, spoke in favor of governmental inter-
vention in matters such as the one under discussion when the private sector
cannot solve the problem and also commented on the advantages to the citizenry
and to the County of home-ownershfp.
There were no other persons registered to address the issue, whereupon
Commfssioner Wimer n~ved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously
carried, that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown that Ordinance
No. 80-66, as entitled below, be adopted.
At Commis:foner Archer's request. Attorney Pickworth explained the
provisions regarding the membership of the Authority. the rights retained by
the Board to dissolve the Authority, and further particulars concerning
the Needs Study.
I , ~
t:
I
Upon call for the question, the motion to adopt the Ordinance carried
4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition.
Attorney Pickworth explained that. having adopted the Ordinance, the
law requires that no business will be transacted by the Authority until a
resolution declarfng the need for the Authority has been adopted, following
which he read the proposed resolution.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commfssioner Brown and carried
4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition, that Resolution 80-130
Declaring the Need for the Hous;ng Finance Authorfty of Collier County,
be adopted.
,,,,,~~';:'r
., >f~l"
.t'
~oo~ 054 fAGE 141
.".'. . .-..----..
':';'.'.. '
"..' . '1/ ..
-.:...;....:' -
--.---.----..
r- --'1
fS'I- Aifl/
- ~'~-~~~;'~":I~ -
-
800X 054 PACE 142.
July 29, 1980
Attorney Pickworth noted t.hat appointments to the Authority would be
scheduled on the agenda for the Board meeting of August 5, 1980; however.
he reque~ted that the Board designate rischer, Johnson. Allen & Burke,
IncorporatedlSoutheastern Municipal Bonds, Inc. as the underwriters on
the project so that liability for the Needs Study can be incurred and
"get the Study going".
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried
4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in oppositfon, that the above-named
firms be designated as the underwriters on the project, as recommended.
ORDINANCE NO.
80-66
ORDINANCE CREATING THE HOUSING FINANCE
AUTHORITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;
PROVIDING A DECLARATION OF NEED; PROVID-
ING FOR THE EXERCISE OF ALL POWERS
AUTHORIZED BY THE FLORIDA HOUSING
FINANCE AUTHORITY LAW; PROVIDING FOR
OPERATIONS WITHIN THE COUNTY; PROVIDING
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS;
PROVIDING FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE
AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINT-
MENT OF MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE
AL TERATfON OF THE AUTHORITY'S ACTIVI-
TIES BY THE COUNTY; PROVIDING SEVER-
ABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
:,~;. "~"""l
~. .. . - '"
"_._.~;~~.__._-
: ",' ,."" 'tr. .- ' .'.".'. ,.' ..,. ~\ , " ' ....' , . " .
I _._ I
I..J
July 29. 1980
EMERGENCY ORDINANCE 80-67 AMENDING COUNTY ORDINANCE 80-54 RE MARCO COI1MUNITY
CENTER MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT PROVIDING THAT GOVERNING BODY SHALL NOT
H^VE THE POWER TO LEVY AD VALOREM TAXES IN EXCESS OF ONE (1) MILL IN ANY ONE
YEAR, PROVIDING FOR EMERGENCY. AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE - ADOPTED
County Attorney Donald Pickworth explained that the ordinance being
presented for' adoption amends Ordfnance 80-54, with regard to the Marco
Community Center MSTU, by inserting language to limit the levying of ad valorem
taxes to one mill in anyone year whfch he said was omitted when the ordinance
was rcdr^ftcd to provide for an advisory board made up of people living on
Marco Island. He said that, under the Law, ad valorem taxes up to ten mills
is pennitted; however, this was not the intent of the Board and that it would
be unfair to allow the pOSSibility of ten mills to defeat the project.
Mr. Ira Evans, representing the Marco Island Taxpayers Association,
questioned the existence of an emergency situation. He also stated his belief
that the disposition of the subject property, in the event that Marco Island
becomes a city, should be included in the ordinance, and. further, that,
pursuant to conferring with knowledgeable persons, there is insufficient
information available to estimate the cost of the Center upon which the
Tesident~ of Marco Island are being asked to approve for construction.
Commissioner Pistor responded to Mr. Evans by stating that the decision
was made that it would be preferable to have the referendum in September and,
therefore, the ordinilnce had to be acted upon fnrnediately. He further explained
that, if the County floats a bond issue, the County would have to maintain
ownership Of the property until the bond issue is paid off; however. in the
event the Island is incorpOl'ated and sufficient funds become available via
a bond issue, or the like, negotiations could be held with the County to make
a transfer. Commissioner Pistor also noted that the deed for th~ subject
property on Marco Island is in Attorney Pickworth's office so there is no
question about the land being available, as alluded to by Mr. Evans. The
method of estimating the cost for the project was explained by Commissioner
Pistor.
Regarding Mr. Evans' confl~nts that perhaps sufficient information is
not being provided in the newspaper articles on the subject, Attorney
Pickworth said that allegations that information is being withheld are not
true. Specifically addressing the matter of the possible transfer of the
BO~K U54 PAGE 145
J
..,...;.
.~
-1"
'/'
:'~'1:~~~"!
!
,.
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
l
~. . '.
, .
:" ~. .'.' " ',.. 'r""', . , ,.;,' . , " '. . . , .' , ':'
'\ ~ i
,....
800X
Of4 PACE146
July 29, 1980
property, he said that there is nothing fn the Law that would prevent the
building from being transferred to the proposed City. the terms of which
would be something that would have to be worked out. However. said Attorney
Pickworth. there is no legal requirement that a promise of such transfer
need b~ fncluded in thp. ordfnance.
I,.
Mr. Leigh Plul1lTler, President of the Marco Island Civic Association.
provfded further information with regard to the estimated costs of the
project and said that the building can probably be constructed for $1,400,000
and can be financed, inrluding $50,000 per year for operating expenses, at
about one-half mill in~tead of using the full mill provided for under the
ordinance. Mr. Plum.~r also explained why it was felt that holding the
referendum in September was preferable to including the project on the
ballot for the General Eleccfon i~ November.
Commfssioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Archer and
unanimously carried, that the Ordinance, as numbered and entitled below, be
adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 11.
..
.........
1
__J
ORDINANCE NO. 80-~
AN EMERGENCY ORDIN^NCE AMENDING COUNTY ORDINANCE
NO. 80-54 RELATING TO TilE HMCO COHMUNITY CENTER
I1UNICIP^L SERVICE TAXING UNIT BY PROVIDING TIIAT
THE GOVERNING BODY OF TIlE UNIT SHALL NOT lI^VE TIlE
POIo1ER TO LEVY AD VALOREM TAXES IN EXCESS OF ONE
(1) MIL IN ANY ONE YEAR: PROVIDING FOR EMERGENCY
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SHERIFF'S BUDGET FOR FY 1980-81 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,403,458 - APPROVED AS
PRESENTED
Fiscal Officer Harold L. Hall reviewed the printout sheets furnished
to the Board with regard to the Sheriff's budget for Fiscal Year 1980-81,
not f ng tha t one of the two sheets s hOl~ the fi ve 1 i ne items. of the fi ve
object codes, that the Sheriff, by Statute, submits to the Board of
County Commissioners; the second sheet I isting allocated expenses which
are attributable to the Sheriff's operatic.1i but which were previously
General Fund expenditures. For the first time, continued Mr. Hall, this
year the Sheriff's Budget will include $72,797 in charges - $46,542
BUilding Department, and $26.255 Data Processing - which are new
II
.,-roil'. .~1I&..."h
.: ,,\ ,'.' 1 'r .~""4 " ' , . , .,. , "',:', ,'.' . " " . '. :
r
,
I
1
,.
'I
.,,--
I ' .:::\ ,,"""',
.f '..;'. ,<l')f1'" ~.,.,.
..-....
July 29. 1980
reimbursements to internal servfce departments. under the internal service
chargeout system started in 1977. Also. said Mr. Hall, there are still
several items, such as grounds maintenance and insurance allocations. which
will appear for the first time and not yet included in the regular budget.
I n summary, Mr. Ha 11 sa i d tha t the Sheriff's Regul ar Budget reques t of the
Roard of County Conlnissioners is $5,403,458 which is a 13% increase over
the amended budget for the prior year; however, he said that over 1% represents
new allocated charges so the request is something less than 12% increase.
Commissioner Archer questioned how the balance of the budgets will be
affected in the event the Sheriff's Budget is approved with a 13X increase,
noting the provisions set forth in the TRIM Bill limit the overall increase
to 8%. Mr. Hall explained that it would only affect the other budgets if
the Board failed to adopt the General Fund Budget by more than a 3/2 vote,
noting that it take 4 out of 5 votes to adopt a budget that exceeds the 8%.
For instance, he continued, if the overall budget passed by a 3/2 vote, then
it would have to be limited to the 8% increase. He pointed ou~ that it is
not just 8% - it is 8X above the roll-back rate, not including new construction
and auJitfons to existing structures, which are included on top of the 8%.
Deputy Chief Barnet!., of the Sheriff's Department, observed that, from
checking with Mr. Hall and Property Appraiser Colding, the budget is well
wi thfn the framework of the TRIM Bi 11, as he understands it. To further
clarify, Mr. Hall said that it is his understanding that, if the Board approves
the Sheriff's Budget as it is, pointing out that he is not ~ugyesting what
action the Board should take on it, it would not place the oth~r departments
in an awkward position, budget-wise, because of its early adoption, unless
the Board would adopt a policy to limit the overall increase to, for instance.
10%. In this event. Mr, Hall said that the difference would then have to come
from "somewhere else"; howevel', he said that this wOllld not be because of the
TRIM Bill but rather because of the Board policy.
Respondi n9 to Coomi ss ioner Archer's query with regard to how much of the
increase in the Sheriff's Budget has been mandated by the State of Florida,
Deputy Chief Barnett replied that the budget is over 90% salaries and,
BOOK
054- PACE 147
II
17;'-. ~
-'~-
.I
--.-l
I
Iii.
I
I
,
I
I
,
I ,
!
~
. .". .' , .. 'r " .' .' :' . . : .::;"'., :". ' ",' " ,
r-
l.iq:~ -TIlii.'
.,,,.... ' 1;;11.
,., 'A.' ~
BOOK
054- pm 148
July 29. 1980
because of the local act involved. it is required that an 8% pay raise be
included in the budget.
Sheriff Rogers said that the Budget being presented Is what is felt to
be the minimum budget under which hfs Department can operate In Fisr.al Year
1980-B1. Referring to a prepared statement, the Sheriff addressed the various
items in the budget, pointing out that one of the largest increases is the
matter of additional personnel necessary. He said that it is necessary for
him to place ten new correctional officers in the Naples Jail this coming year.
although the recommendatfon forthcoming from the State Correctfons Office is
for twenty. After looking over the study and working with his staff. said
Sheriff Rogers, it Is felt the lesser number will suffice and still enable
him to be basically In compliance with the standards set following various
court decisions, citing examples of same. Jail Management, Inflation, Pay
Adjustments. additional personnel needed for the Warrants and Intake Section as
r.~ndated. need for additional Courtrooms and Court Space necessitating additional
bail iffs, the need for an additional Investigator in the Immokalee area.
expansion in the Goldpn Gate Estates area requiring additional patrol opera-
tions. wen: all items addressed by the Sheriff.
Commissioner Wimer observed that he has reviewed the She, iff's Budget
in great detail. complimenting the Sheriff on Its preparation. following which
he moved for approval of the Budget as presented. Commissioner Brown seconded
the motion.
Mr. Walter Olson raised a question regarding the salary figures contained
in the Budget, suggesting there might be a discrepancy between the 8% fncrease
in salaries. as stated, and the 21% figure shown for Agricultural Deputies and
Other Deputies. Deputy Chief Barnett explained that this is due in part to the
fact that the personnel is required to work 44 hours per week and that a flat
10% is added in for this reason. There was a brief discussion of the forms
dnd procedures used in the budget preparation with Deputy Chief Barnett
clarifying the alleged discrepancy.
There was a brief discussion concerning the payment of prisoners' medical
bills with Hr. Hdl1 suggesting that it would be simpler if the Sheriff paid
r--
1
II
'~7~.,
"r--'
111 . f ~lLl
-....-.
.... ... 1 r
'\
I
,
J
...
!
:' ':'.< ,:'," '. '. "r" ',' ,,' ',: : ..' ", ,.', ~"'. . ""':' : "',' ,: '
L ..1
I
July 29, 198U
, '
~
I
such bills rather than send them to the Board at the end of the year. Follow-
ing an explanation of the present system being used in this regard by the
Sheriff. Mr. Hall said that further details could be worked out at a
later date.
Upon call for the question by a roll call vote, the motfon to adopt the
Sheriff's Budget for FY 80-81 carried unanimously.
i,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
RESOLUTION 80-131 RE PETITION PU-80-0C, SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, REQUEST-
ING PU (3) OF "RS-3" DISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SCHOOL ON BLOCK 357, UNIT 7, _
CITY OF GOLDEN GATE - ADOPTED, SUBJECT TO STAFF STIPULATIONS; PETITIONER'S
AGREEMENT TO STIPULATIONS - ACCEPTED
Planner Lee Layne located the property in question with regard to Petition
PU-80-8C. filed by the School Board of ColI fer County. requesting PU(3) of
"RS-3" District. as being all of Block 247 in Unit 7, in the City of Golden
Gate, more generally described as being south of Golden Gate Parkway and west
of Tropicana Boulevard. She advised that the staff has reviewed the petition
and is recommending approval subject to certain stipulations, and noted that
the Coastal Area Planning Commission held their public hearing on the
petition on July 17, 1980 and made a finding of fact, included as part of the
proposed resolution, ttJat the requirements of Section 14.10 of the Zoning
Ordinance have been met. The recolT'l1lendation of the CAPC is for approval
subject to the staff's stipulations.
Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and unanimously
carried, that Resolution 80-131 with regard to Petition PU-BO-8C, as detailed
above, be adopted subject to staff's stipulations. and that the petitioner's
Agreement to said stipulations be accepted.
,\
~
*
*
*
*
*
II
'I.' ~
"... --..""" .
*
BOOA 054 PAGE 149
..- -
7. ,.' . . .' . . . . 0.....'
'. '. ;
. . ... ~.
. ,
. ,
;.' .'~'.'.. ' ' .... ". " li' .: '.
,'\ -........--
/ ~_......' -
-.........-..-:- ....._._.--..._~---_...- '\,
BOOK 054 pm 1.56
July 29. 1980
CllMRl.Wl AUTIIORIZED TO SIGN FMHA AGREEMENT FOR COMMITMENT RE GOODLAND WATER
DISTRlCT; ALTERNATE SITE FOR LOCATION OF STORAGE TANK (ROUTE 92) - APPROVED.
SU[JJECT TO VERIFICATION OF GROUND CONDITIONS
Utilities Divi~icn Directe~ Irving Berzon. reporting on the status of
the GlJodland Water District, said that additional infonnation has just been
received during the last two or three days. fie recalled that a new request
for grant and loan applications were submitted and, based on that request,
the runners Home Administration is provfding $224,000 supplement to the grant
orlginully issued noting that the District now has a grant for $608.000.
Additionully. said Mr. [Jerzon, the Letter of Commitment has also been revised.
as fdr as assessments, so that the District can proceed with a property
assessment as well as a Revenue Bond Issue. He asked that the Chainnan be
authorized to sign the Agreements for Commitments reflecting the conditions
noted.
Corrrnfssioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown. that the
subject docun~nts be approved for the Chairman's signature.
The following persons voiced their support of the system:
1. Hs. Virginia Goggin
2. Ethan Gober
3. Art Calvert
4. ~'s. Marian Harden
Mr. Harold ~rantner also voiced his approval for the system and questioned
the absence of persons in opposition and inquired if there has been a lawsuit
filed with regard to the bond validation. County Attorney Pickworth explained
that the bond validation has not been filed as yet and, therefore, there is no
way of knowing whether or not it will be contested, suggestirg that it is
possible. He explained the appeal procedure involved. Conmi~sioner Archer
recalled a similar situation in the County wherein opposition to a project
resulted in approximately $700,000 additional costs in interest fees with
the accompanying additional costs in building supplies for the project. He
ddde~ the hope that there will be no further complications with the project
under discussion noting that if there ~re it will ~ost the affected persons.
Upon call for the question the motion authorizing the Chairman to sign
certain documents, as recommended by Mr. Berzon, carried by unanimous vote.
'" '1
f"
,.J"
.~~., '.~fl
"'":':,~:''. ,...,;:.......,
.1';'
r ",. ".R<l
--
I
j
t
Jl
.Y"
4....f~...
~.
----
. '" .' . '. ".. ....' - .:. .
, . t , .
... ' r ' . . . ~ . .
. J
L__]
July 29. 1980
rerzon reported that DOT has advised that the necessary legal descrip-
ti rarcel sketches, and the like. are being prepared for the tank site
to r" ,^t the transfer of the deed to the land that DOT controls. said property
be;, ':!rated near the Goodland Bridge. He called upon the Engineering Con-
Sill' ",' '.0 apprise the Board of his opinion and evaluation of the site, as
CO" I. ' I f n his correspondence deli vered thi s da te.
Ted Smallwood reviewed briefly the reasons why the original site
pt''': I vias considered to be more desirable; however. he said that it is now'
frl~ ';,t the Route 92 Bridge site will be adequate. He pointed out that the
suhjrd site will not provide expansion area, if necessary in the future. but
at ~':'. time that is not considered to be necessary due to the commitments from
~br(r' ,r,l,lnd Utility. It was his recommendation that the Board proceed wit:.
i'r ,,'oval of the site provided that the DOT will effect the transfer.
("missioner Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor, that the
afo,'.:"'nt.!oned site be approved for location of the storage tank with regard
to the Goodland Water District.
r0Jarding any additional costs involved. as questioned by County Attorney
Pickwnt.th, Mr. Smallwood said that there will be no signfficant difference in
the cr,t of construction, but the increased pumping costs will affect the over-
all ,1:"1,11 cost which he estimated to be $200 to $300 per year basically. He
noted that the major issue between the proposed site and the Kirk site is the
reliability of emergency water supply, commenting on the possibility of pipe-
line failure due to the poor condition of the soil along the road into Goodland,
particularly in the event of a hurricane.
At Mr. Berzon's request. the motion was amended to include approval based
upon verification of the ground conditions. and. upon call for the question.
the llIotion carried L1nanimously.
*
*
*
*
*
*
&OOK 054 rACE 157
" .
. }~~!W,::~':._-- - ;,--:H
.'
.,.",..,'
- 'T r
"~~'f
t
f
$
.
!
f
~
,
~
~,
~
I
r
[:
(:.
"
(!"
~:
,- -~
,'; .~
. "^ . '.
l<lil~.,,,\ ~ ~~~:
.' . '.. '"
, . ., I
",'hi
~;jtli
flOOK
054- PAGE 162
'\, .
\ ;
I
rl
!
, I
, \'
,J'J I Y 2'). ] ')1\0
CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO INITIAL CORRECTlOrj OF TYPOGRfd'IiI(,\1. "''''nD 1:1 II'ASE
AGREEMENT WITH MS. BLYE TREADWAY FOR PROVISION OF O!llfY Sf'id.i Inll IIIF fARMERS
HOME ADMINISTRATION, IMMOK/I,!..EE (TERM OF LEASE 7/1/80 lQ !l.U~,-U_____.--:.-
Following brief explanation, as contained in tht' I'XI'C111. i 'I!, 5111"11i1I'Y pre-
pared by staff, Commissioner Archer moved, seconded by COlllll'issinr1r'r I-limer
and unanimously carried. that the Chairman be authorizcd to ill i I. i,] I oJ
correction of a typographical error noted in the Lease A'Jl'e('!lIl'lIl. 1,Ii Lh ;'\s., 81ye
,Treadway for the provision of office sp,Ke for the ftlrlllcrs IluIIH, i\clllllllistratfon.
llIlmokalef', correcting the expiration dilL!' of the Lease Lo JUlY I, lJiJI.
GUN PERMIT NO. 80-10 AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE TO RON FAULKNER COtHl/'lGENT
UPON VERIFICATION THAT APPLICANT HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED OF FELDrjY OR CRIME
OF VIOLENCE
Pur"IJilnt to brfef COlTlment by County Manaqer NOnl1,1I1, CI)"''';'''' iOIH'I' I-lillll,r'
moved. ,,,conded by Conmis^,ioner Archer, that Gun Permit No. 110-10 hI' ,1uthorized
for issuance to Ron Faulkner. Deputy Chief Barnett asked thilt the i1pproval
be contingent upon certification that the applicant has not hrcn convicted
of a felony nor il crime of violence, c"ere was no objf'cted voic!''' i1nd the
amended motion carried unanimously.
BOARD APPROVES ADDITION OF REGULAR BCC EMPLOYEE CUSTODIAL POSITION fOR GOLDEN
GATE COM_M!JNITf CENTER TO REPLACE RECENTLY TERMINATED CETA CUSTOOl/\L POSITiON
t
r
, Ii I
CO/lllllissionel' Wimer moved seconded hy Commissioner Brown and unanimously
carried, t.hat the addition of il regular' fleC employee ctlstodiill position for
the Goldel1 Gate Community Center, to rf'plilcf' the recently tenninated CETA
custodial position, be ilpproved, pursuant to recommendation set forth in
the Executive Summary dated July 17, 19130 prepilrf'd by staff.
!
~
I
r
BOARD APPROVES DELETION OF ASSISTANT STOCKADE DIRECTOR AND ADDITION OF ONE
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER POSITION
Pursuant to staff recommendation, ,1S contained in the Executive Summary
dated July 29, 1980, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner
Archer ilnd unanimously cilrried, thilt the position of Assistant Prison Stockade
Director be deleted and an additional Correctional Officer position be deleted
and an additional Correctional Officer position be ap~;'oved.
J,
0,
r
....
r---'''~
~ ----'--~.:-~.\~-
(~
~
~
!
f
r
I
f
.
I
~
~
,
1
I
..,.......~....... ..,.
...."i.. f
~ ..:~~~.'
,. '.
I ' J
I j LJ, i )00
RESOLUTION 80-146 RE PETITION PU-80-6C, WILLIAM IILJ:lr, 1,i ,.,,, ,..::~) OF "RO"
DISTRICT FOR MODEL FLYING CLUB ON PORTION OF Sll, "1'., f 'rl) !'ITII
STIPULATIONS: PETITlON[R'S AGREEMEN~ TO STIPULATICJ,i., - i':'AI ,,'I; i",';wl'idi\TE
LEASE. FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY TO BE PREPARED FOR FUTlli~E prrc,r rn r r I nil TO r.OARD: STAFF
RECOMt'1ENDATIONS FOR PROCEDURAL CHANGES RE GRANT ltiG UF I'j.:,;,,' J:, I :::I/d, IM.S TO BE
I UJm:~lJMIN~
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commf"',:r.~~ (.-,.1
t! . '. Resolution
80-l~6 wfth regard to Petition PU-80-6C, filed by
of "RO. District for the establishment of an area
c- : i '''1 PIJ (1 5)
: i i'p LlrleS can be
flown in a portion of Section 11, Township 51 Soulh, ~.
[:.:, I..' ac!opted.
subject to staff stiuplations~ and that the petfti,;;,o':r's i'~'" ':'1,,:-:, trJ slJeh stip-
ulations be accepted.
Community Development Administrator Virta exr1aine,j tl111 :hr n!'eCSS<lry lease
for the subject property has, as yet, not been prcn~~n~ in finJl form. Th- ~~afr
dfrected that the lease be brought back to the [lO.1l"d for' i1;;","J,)1 \./hr::n iJ'Iailable.
Upon call for the questfon, the motion carried unanilJ'''Ii;ly.
fhe methodology of issuing Provisional Uses was discussed with Mr. Virta and
County Attorney Pickworth providing input. Mr. Virta sa id tI,., t wi thin the very
near "I'.lJre a new zonin~l ordinilnrp will I'" ready for re'lie'l by the Planning Agencies
whiel, ,,111 clarify some of the problems with regard to the maller, and which will
be SlJl'-,cqlJently presented to the Board for their eonsicJeratiGn,
*
*
'*
k
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
eoo~ 054 PAGE 163
i
.1
r
r
/
July 29, 1980
BOOK ~1t PtE~~~~ BOCA CIEGA VILLAGE (FORMERLY LAKEWOOD UNIT 7) RE PETITION
FP-80-5C - APPROVED, SUBJECT TO UTILITY DIVISION'S STIPULATIONS - AGREEMENT
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS - AU1~ORIZED -
MAINTENANCE BOND ACCEPTED
Pursuant to staff recommendation, as contained in the Executive Summary
dated July 11, 1980, Commissioner ~limer moved, seconded by Corrvnissioner Brown
and unanimously carried, the Final Plat* for Boca Ciegil Village, fonnerly
Lakewood Unit 7, re Petition FP-80-5C, be approved, subject to the Utility
Division's stipulations contained in letter dated July 15, 1980 from
Utilities Manager Berzon to Engineer Cl ifford H, Schneider.
* Final Plat recorded in Plat Book #12, Page 105,
*
*
*
..
*
I
\1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
;j
;1
July 29. 19BO
ONE 8" WATER WELL PERMIT NO, 65.317. REQUESTED BY IMPERIAL GOLF CLUB. INC,
FOR CONSTRUCTION IN S15L_~'ln~~25:: - APPROVED, SU[JJECT TO Wr,\A[J STIPULATIOJ~~
Conrnissioner Wimer PlOved. seconrlrrl hy Corrrnissioncr Brown and unanimously
carried, that one 8" Water Well Permit. Permit No, 65,317, as requested by
Imperial Golf Club, Inc, for constnlction in Section ]:), Tovmship !\f] South.
Range 25 East. be approved. subject to thr: following c,tipuliltions by thr~ l'later
Management Advisory flOilnl:
1. A copy of the dri Ilr~r' s 101) sh,lll be subnlittecJ co tbe County
Engineer upon complctinn nf tbl' dl"illing opcr,ltion,
2. A water analysis l'r:gardin(1 1'1,1tl'r <iua1ity shilll be submitted to
the County Engineer,
3. Maximum depth of the well shall not exceed 100 feet,
4, Maximum 600 gpm pump ,hilll be instillled,
FINAL ACCEPTANCE or PORTION Of NORTII flARfrfLO DRIVE AND PORTION or EI.KCAM CIRCLE,
MARCO ISLAND - APPROVED
._---------------------- ---~_._-_._-_.__._--~---~-- ----------
COlll11issioner PistOl' Il'oved, second,'! hy CrJn1fTlissionrr flrown and LHlilnirnously
carried, that the Iloa','d ilppl"OVe tllC fin,11 ilcceptiloce of a portion of tlorth [larfield
Drive and a portior. of Elkcarn eir,:le. both on Harco Island, as recommended by staff
in the Executive SUlIlllary Ivi th r"cgdnl to the matter,
[JOARD APPROVES PRELlr,lINAiU ACCEI'TA:KE ai' VM\IOUS STlnTTS (13) \~ITIIIN 1!,MICO flEACH,
UNIT L-___~_.. __ u___~___~.__~. ____~"_._________.__________.
Commissioner ristoI' r;J[)'J('d, :,ccondcd hy COIT"lllissio'wr I~irnl~r and tlf1ilnirnously
carried, that the [load approve p\"('l il:lir:,lI"( aCCi'pL1nCe of tlw followinrj streets
within Mat'co Beach, Unit 6. r,.)[1!C havinCJ bef'r1 accepted by staff:
1. Wales Court
2. Golden Rod Avpnue (bel\veen Wales (11)(1 Edcje\'later)
3. Wales [Jridge
4. Waterleaf Court
5. Marquesas Cout't
6. Admiralty Court
7. Capistrano Court
8, [Jass Court
9. Strawberry Court
10. Hunt Court
11. South Joy Cuurt
12, West Joy Circle
13. Rio Court
As pointed out in t.he Executive SUIII:'lilry pcrtainin<j to the matter thilt the
acceptance is with the undet'stilncling tll<lt The Deltona Cor'poration \'/ill be required
to maintain the subject stl'eets for a one-yeal' maintenance period, at which time
Bn~', C54- PIM 181
...,.~~
i
I,
BOOK 054 PAGE 1BZ
July 29, 1980
the streets will be reinspected for any deficiencies.
PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF PALM RIVER ESTATES, UNIT 7 - APPROVED; RELEASE OF
IRREVOCMlLE LETTERS OF CREDIT NOS, S-64 AND S-65 - AUTHORIZED; IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREO IT NO. S- Wi (F 1 RST NAT! O~'AL ~AllK OF FORT I~Y[flS) PI THE AMOUNT
.9.L.Jl?_, 600---I.9B-.9i;I.-:Jl:.fIB_ .1j0..li~T_[!~-^J~~~_~~,~..EfTX!L. ._. ..____,____ ______
Corrmissioner \~imer moved, seconded by Commissioner [Jrown and unanimously
carried. that the Ilo<1T'd approve Prelirnin<1l"Y Ilcceptance of r'llrn ~iver Estates,
Unit 7; authorize the rele,lse of Irrevocable LeLters of Cn~dit iios. 5-64 and
S-65; and that IlTevocable LetU'I' of Credit t10. S-85, frr.Jm the First National
!lank of Fort :'1yel's in thr~ ,mollnt of $32,600 fay' one-year' r'fa intenance security,
be accepted.
BOARD APPROVES [i~r~t.IJJAT[ I\SPII!\LT OVEHLA'I O~' APr)ROXII~^TELY SIX r~ILES OF C,R,
846 (N~LES.:J..t1.!.'I9..K_J}!c.r:LR..OAJlJ. ...._____..____________.______.____
As rccontllendr'd by st,lff, (mlllnissiorlcr [Jt'(1vll1 mov(~d, seconded by Corrmissioner
~Jirnel' anr1 carrir~d 11l1,lrrirno\Jsly, that the [Joard approve an imrn('diatr. asphalt over-
lay of appy'oxirnatr'ly ';ix rniles of (,f(, 846 by utilization of drHl\Jal asphalt
contracts. ,lnd with fll11dil1'J fnJm tlw Sth ,lnr1 Gth rent (;,lS T,lX.
PETITION FRO!,' PROPEHTY OWJERS ALONG COPE LAtlE FOR EST.'\\JLISI!i1Ern OF ROAD IMPHOVE-
MEN1 DISTRICT - ACCEPTED; STAI'F AUTHORIZED TO ACQUIRE NEEDED RIGHTS-OF-WAY ArlO
JO PREPARE PRiJ,J!'.~I~_A!~_..f.r:..0.s..!.D.I!J.l'!..Jl!POB..T l\rlQ__c-9_~0..TJ.li~lF:...__.
COII''llissiont'" \~ill1t'r !IIoved. seconded by COII\l1issione,' Archei', that the staff
recommendation i'OI' the ,lCCPpt.lI1ce of J pr;titiOI1 1'y'o11 property O\'/I1I;1'S alll.:tting
Cope !..,lne, l'eqIH~$l.in'l 1.11(' (P;Llbl islwrent of J Road Improvelllent District, be ap-
proved; and th,lt the staff be ,wt.hol'ized to acquire the nr.eded rigflts-of-way and
to prepare a prel iminal'Y f",lSibi 1 i ty report dnd cost estimate for future presentaticn
to the Board.
At the request of r1r, ,John Cope. Cope Lane resident, Pub] ic Works Administrator/
Engineer Barksd,lle explail1('rI the IlH'thod for assessing the O'o'iners fOI' the road
improvement, and for rep,l'jlllenl. of such assessment, and noted that the affected
property ownel's wi 11 Ill' nOl:i fir'r1 of the date f8r the publ ic }learinrJ regarding
the project,
Upon call f(Jl' the qu(;stion, the motion carried unanimously.
July 29, 1980
QUIT-CLAIM DEED RELEfSE FOR SECURITY ON ROYAL PALM GOLF ESTATES AND SUBSTITUTION
OF IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT FROM CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK IN TIlE AMOUNT OF
$77,'100 GUARANTYING COMPLETION OF PHASE I - APPROVED
As expl.,ined ~nd recommended by staff in the Executive Summary ~Iith regard
to the matter, Conlnissiollcr ArcheI' moved, seconded by Conmissioner Pistol', that
the Board ilprrOV(~ .,nd accept ]n Inevocilblc Letter of Credit from the Citizens
Niltional [Jilnk, in the d1ll0UIlt of $17,000 to guarilntee the completion of the
construction of Phase I ~Iithin Roy"I Palm Golf Estates; also, that the Goard
approve the County's execllt ion of a Quit-claim Deed to ,'elease fllocks fl, C, D, E,
and all of Lots 1-63. inclusive, of fllock A, located in Royal [",1m Estates, Ur,it I,
which were posted as security for the completion of the subdivision.
Following comment by flssis'ant County Attorney Pires that there are no
problems involved othe)' thilll a modification from the bank to the Letter of Credit,
Commissioner Archer "melHJcd his motion, with Commissioner Pistor concurring, that
the approval be COlit illgent upon fUI'ther apJ1I'oval by Attorney Pires and Engineer
Bilrksdale. The motion carried unanimously.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
B[)J~ 054 r',CE 1B3
'1':'........
&OOK 054 PAGE 186
Ju 1 y 2'), 1080
RESOLUTION R-8D-l~7 REQUESTING GOVERNOR TO RECONSIDER WrTHDR^W^L OF FUNDING
RE 1-75 PROJECT - ADOPTED
Pub] ic Works ^dl'linistrator/Engineer Barksdale (Jppr;sed the Aoard of recent
information received concerning the f,jct that the ~Iork pro'Jr"olln VIi th reqard to
1-15 wi thin Coll ier County has been ~,; thdrawn from the DOT Five-Yrar Program,
/Ie rointed out thr cffrct:, this Vlill have on the County's Fivp-Year Program
and cOlllnitments concr.rning the purchase of rights-of-~Iay and the design ~Iork
for Golden Gate Parkway, and the like, which have been planned in anticipation
of the 1-75 project, Mr. Barksdale requested that the Aoard adopt a resolution,
prepared by hil11, l'i;qur:'sting the Governor to reconsider t' e contemplated action.
Commissionel' \~im('r movr.d. seconded hy Commissioner [lro~m "nd un,lnimously
carried, that ResollJt,i:m fl 80-11)7, as above-referenced. be ildopted,
ConT11issionel" Archer urged the various civic organizations to support the
Board with a similar type resolution to the Governor, It was noted by the
Chamber of COnJllcl'ce r'cprrsentative in attendance that such action hilS ill ready been
implemented,
*
*
*
*
*
*
~
*
*
*
',ro;
\
,
(800)( 054 PAGE 188
July 29, 1080
~ID NO. n?~ TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL PARK[NG SPACE AT GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY
f.~NT EB.__~_~~~-^ BPJ.LTQ ! I, I_r~~~~y-.1{\ VE R_S-,- NAP L E?LJ~J:iL-^I~OlLN1~_~1l-,-5JJl-,.~.____
Legdl notice havinu been published in the N~ples Oaily News on June 12
and 15, 1980 as evi,knced by Affidavit of rubllcation Filed vliUI the Clerk, bids
with regard to Rid No, n2G, to provide for additional parking space at the Golden
Gate Community Center. w're received until July 2, 1980.
COllllTlissioncr ,~illlf't' l:Joved, seconded by COlTlmissioner Pistor' and carried
unanimously, that [Jid No, ,126 be ilvl,lrded to Highway Pavers, Ndples, io the amount
of $8,510.50. for fllrl1ishin(j ,111 labor. eqllipment, mal:eridls ,lnd services nec-
essary for parking lot add; tion at the Golden Gate C0l1111111nity Center, as recommenden
by the PurchasinC) Oir"ct.or in the Executive SIJI1l111ary dated ,July 11, 1'180; and, that
the Chairman be .1lJthoriled to sign. and 1:10,' Clerk attp.st, t.he resulting Agrp.ement.
LIllRAflY [QUI P~1[NT (111\[ \-;Enl,ER 1'1I!'1EllGRI~PII DUPLICATOR) OECL.I\REIJ SURPLUS AND
AUTHO 13JJ i~~J:DP_jc~~,L.TO TI ~I:_ _CJ_T,'!...aJ:..~ s T _-"-^U'1-..f3JJli!L!J~_TlU;.~:LOr~J?.'lUl
As rp'colIllIlI:I'd,'rj in I.h.' [xl-,cllti'l': S1I111111,lry prp.p.lrr:d hy staff dated ,July 16,
1980, Cnllllllissione,' Iii!'!.')" !!I(]V!:'.i. seconde.j by CI}ll1missioner P.istor dnd un,lnimously
ca:-ried. that olle (1) W,'lJllI'r ~1imeograph DIJpl icator b,: declared Ubrary sllrplus,
and dutl10rizerj for 0,.11' 1.0 thp. City of ,Jest Palm fJe,lch for the sum of $291.23,
BID NO, '12' rOF R[flLf\.U.r'1L,~r Mill IN:iri\Ll.AT!ON or CCIJLING TOWER /\ND FflN FOil COURT-
HOUSE COt-' - A\II~.RIJLi) TO Cf1l\RLES '..lEEKS HEATliJG Arm COOLING IN THE A~10IJNT OF
lli.,.2.l.0_.._. __.. ___' _ _d ..... _ ...._ __.. ___ ___.____________ __ ____ ___ ._.________________
[,'gal nntice h,lViTl'J [leen ,JUblished in the Napl,'s Daily NeVIS on ,June 13 and
16, 1980 do; evidenced by l\fFidJ'llt of Publ ication filed \vith the Clerk, !lids re
Bid No, 427, for the rr'lll,lCClllent and installation of a Cooling Tower and ran for
the Courthouse Complex. were received until July 2, 1980.
Pursuant to staff r'ecommendation. as set forth in the Executive Summary
dated July 15. 19110, CClTllllissioTler ilimer lTIoved. s('conded by COlllmissionc:r Pistor
ar.d unani:~~ous 1y carried, t:~{] t ~~ ;(,~ No. 427, as dc,t:~ i 1 cd J.~JO'.'c, b~~ ;)'...'o1rGcd t.o
Charies ''':~ek:; H(~at.ii~~ J;~d C:~01 ~:~g ~:~ the amOu~1t of $10\530, J.;-',G ~hJt U~C Ch~liri'l1Jn
be duthoriz('d to Si'Jll, ,1I1d th,' Clerk attest. tl11: resulting Agreelllcllt.
It......
,July 29, 1980
[lIDS RECEIVED RE BID NO. "22 FOR FURNISHING W\TERIAL FOR FISHING REEF ON MARCO
ISLAND - REJECTED: WAIVER OF [lID PROCESS - APPROVED; ANGLERS ASSOCIATION AND
STAFF AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE WITH CONTRI\CTOflS FOR PROJF:CT
L0~al n0ticc having tl0cn putllishcd in t~lC t!Jplcs !1~ily r:CW5 Oil ~~ay 1~ ~,)d
16,19[10 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with thc: Clerk, bids
I'Jit.h r(''lard t.o Ilid IIn. "77, for furnic,hil'<). !.r'1w;[)ort.inq ,11)(j d'.Jrnpifl<) material';
to fonn ,1 reef oif 1'1ill'CO Is1clnd, wer'e received until r1ay 21\,19110,
Mr. Roher!. /\hhntt, Chairm,1n of the Reef Cornllli tt('(' of thr> Col1 if'l' Count.y
Anglel's Associill.ion, rr>Cjucc,tr>d the floard to consider rr>jectinrJ the hids received
since. ,1S contained in the Executive SUlllmary prepared iJ/ staff dated July 21.
19EJO. the cost per cubic yar'd l'!ilS ton hi9h, the lo\'! biddpr would Iw using some
material fl'om ol:':side of Collier COlmty in viol,1tion of the [lid Specifications
and t.hat. the hirJh cost \vill limit the amount of matr-rial thilt can be located to
the noe f s i I.e.
PIIl'ch,lsinr) Oin'ct.cll' Frank Wilcox explained that. it has been sU<)f)ested by
t.he DNR that t.he COllnt.y nCCjotiate with individual contractor:. in supplying ilnd
transpodin~] matcTial to the fishing reefs.
Commiscionf'I' (,ill1!'r mC1vc'd. seconded by C0I1!Q,i5sioner Ilro\'l:l and unanimou~,ly
carried. 1.I',lt. I.hl' l,iljc; n:ccived \'!it.h t'egard to Ilid tio, "22, ,1S det.ailed above,
be rejected; t.hal thl' biddin'J l)J'ocess fOI' t.he sllbject. Bid Ire 1'I,1ived; il;ld t.hat
the l\n<}lcr5 Associ,lLillll. in conjllnct.ion with "Llff. Ile authm'i7'~d to neCjotidte
with individll<1l UlIltYdCt:Ot':; (01' the: pl'ojr>cl.
BIDS NOS. ~23 AND ~2.1 RE FOUR-LANING OF GOODLETTE EXTENSION AIID AIRPORT ROAD _
A2,.AJ~I2I-',D.J9_. !i.I.r~ ~\,A y .I'.A V.EI~S.,. .1N_C,,_,.!i^!'.lJ.S-,_.IJ~_TI.I,Fc 1~!~O.IHi!_.CU~..S_S".~~S.?)_Q.S.Q.. G S ______
Legal noticec, havinfJ Lleen published in t.he IJaples Daily ~Iews on June 9 and
11. 19EJO Mid in lhe j.\iall1i lIer'illd on JUllf' ]:), 19EJO, ,1S evidenced Iry Affidavi ts of
Publiciltion filed \'1ith the Cled:, Irids \vit.h regan! to [lids NGs, "23 and 42" for
the Four-Laning of Goodlettc Extension and Airport Road were received until July
9. lfJEJO,
Pursuant. t.o thl' reconmendatian cont.ained in t.he Executive SUIIlf1wry [lrepal'ed
by staff d,1trd July 21, lfJBO. Comlnissionel' PistOl' moved, seconded Iry COtllf1issioner
[lro\'JJl and unanimou:;ly c,wried, that Cid:; Nos, "23 ,1nd ~2", and its alternate
BOO,~ 054- PASE 189
BOO~ 054 P^CE 190
July 29, 1980
additive, be dl'lanJp.d to Hi<Jhway Pavel's, Inc.. Naples, Florida, in the amount
uf $5,059,058,55', ilnd that the Chairman lJe iluthorized to sign, and the Clerk
attest, the resu1tin9 A<Jreements.
rt W,1S pointcd out by Corrrnission(~r Pistol' that the Chi(~f r:nqiocer,
Cl i ffonl !lark,;rI<I Ie. did SOIllC finc cngincering I'lOrk in pf'('pilrirlg the !Jid spec-
i ficatiol1S which l'r~Slil tl'd ill d $GOO,(]OO saviIHj:; to t,he County I'dth re'larrJ to
the project,
Commissioner' Ilrown moved, second cd by COlnn;ssiooer I-limer and unanimously
can'il~d, UI,1t Ellginccr Ilar'ks.iale be awardcd a "vote of thanks" for his dccompl ish-
men I:.
[lIll rm, ~29 FOI~ l'A'IIUr. /\NfJ fJI!AU;M;E or KAr~EN DRrVE MID COTTAGE GROVE /\vENUE -
A Hi\ IllJE Il T(]!~5i I_L~iJ~,[): :H.I:!~,__[!'.c.:_,_J'!'J'_I__E,),,-.r~l_J.!Ii_ !'!:1.0,lJ..N.I-Q.l~_ jJL_z.Q.!~__ _
LI'')<l1 rlllticl' lidVinr) 111'1'11 plllll i:;IH'd in thc N,1pl(~s lJa; Iy [Iews Ilrl ,June 20 dnd
2~;, l')HO ,1:; I'vid,"lll:ed I)y Ilffidavit of Publication filed I'lith the Clerk, bids I'/ere
rr;cl~ivcd III1ti1 ,)1I1y ]r;, l'JnO \'1ith r'egard to Bid !1~29 for UI[~ paving and drainag,~
of K,ll'CIl Dr'iv(' ,11lt! CottiHW Grove Avelllle.
PII1'Sllallt t.o sl.aff rr~collllIl('nd,1tion, a~; containc,d in the Executive Su;rl1lilry dated
JlIly 21, l')fJ(], [OllllllissioIlCl' \'JilJl(~I' moved, Sl'collded by Commissioner Brown and un-
,illillHJIISly ':dITir.rI, til,d: 111<1 rio. Ijt'') , till' UII! pdvill') dlllJ drailla'.le uf Kill'en Drive
,11lll Cott,1']I' r~I'I)'I(' r\VI'IIU{~, 1)(' ,\\'1dnlcd tll i'\~;ilLllld 1,lalTcn. fne" r,aplr~s, ;n the
alllOUI1 t of $77. Iii I. SO; dlld tila t till' Chi! i IT!an bc au thori zed to sign, and the Cl erk
attl'St., tllc I'C';lIltill(j l\<jreelnent.
BID PROCESS FOR PURCHASr: AND INSTALLATION OF AIR CONDITrONING UNIT FOR JUDGE'S
CHAMGERS. [JIJILDING ")\", WAIVED; STAFr AUTHORIZED TO SOLlCrT COMPETITIVE I-IRITTEN
QUOTATIONS RE SAi-1E; $3,000 AUTHORIZED fOR PRO,JECT AND APPROPRIATE GUDGET . 1END-
:'1UHS TO I1E i)I~U)i',!~!D
I\S cOlltairll't! ;n till' [xcclltiv(~ :iunlnJdl'Y prl'pdred 11Y staff, dated ,July 21,1980,
Cllll1lllissiol1e!' \';;'11('1' ~lIovcd th"t. dill' to t.he 1II'')['IlCY UI the IlIatter'. tile bid process
iJ(' I.aived frH' I.IIC plll'cllasC elmi ill~,t.illlatioll of ,ill air' cOllditionin'lunit for the
Judge's Challlbers, in Iluildillg "A"; t(lOt the f'urclldsing Department be duthol'ized
to solicit cOlllpetitive written quotdtions; and that $3,000 be authorized for the
project and ti,e ,I'j;c,ll Offjc,~J' be instructed to make the ilppropriate bucl'j"t amend-
ments to the p)'opcr' accollnt, The lIlotion \'idS seconded by COl1vnissioner I1nvrln and
unan; 111CUS 1 y carr j I'd.
, .
-,
I
July 2g, 19BO
PURCIIAS~ MW INSTALLATION OF AIR CONDlTlONING SYSTEM FOR STOCKADE ADMINISTfV'TIVE
(1FFICES AHARDED TO CONDlTIONED AIRE lN THE AMOUNT OF $2,969; DID PllOCESS WAIVED
(JlI_BfL_Qt~Q.l^}_.LQ.~--.LN..JJ.L~..J:.9RMOr ~IRITTEN ~J~_OPOSALS HAVING [JEEN nF~CEIVED)
For' the rCJ:;or,:; ~ct forth in the stuff' 5 Cxecutive Summl1ry dJtcd ,July 21, 1900,
Com:11issioner Brown Inovel, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and un~nilnuusly carried,
thi\t the pUI-chi\se and installation of an Air ConditioninCJ System for the St.ockade
Adnlinistl-ative Offices be awarded to Conditioned Aire in the amount of $2,969;
(1nd that the hid [1rOce5S be I-wived, three fluotations in the form of wt'itten [11'0-
p05015 having been received,
GHANT AI'Pl. I CAT I m1 FOI~ IIm\EI~AKERS SERV I CE OF COI.Ll Ell COUNTY - M'[1ROVEO FOR CIIAI Rt~AN' S
~lJ>!i~IJ-'-U:______..nn..__.___ __________.
COlmlissiorlel' Wimel- moved, seconded by Commissioner IlrOlm und unanimously
carried, Uwt th(~ Grant. Appl iCilt.ion for t.he lIomemakers Service of ColI ier County be
c1pprovpd for the Chail-man's signature, as recommended in the Executive Summary
prcp<ll'ed by stoff,
Socia] Services Director r1art.ha Skinner expl-essed her appreciat.ion to the Board
for tlll'il' SIIPP()l-t of the Pnlgl'am for' the sixth consecutive year,
RESOl.llflON RO-133 REPEALING RESOLUTION 80-105 RE PET1TION V-80-BC, VIRGIL MARCUM,
CORI~ITf)r~G U,ROR AND OMISSION THEREIN - /\DOPTED
-- ._----.-- --- -- -_._~ ._- -. -_... ------- ------.----.--....- ._------~_._--
COllll1lissioflCI' \~ifller moved, seconded hy Commissioner Brown and unanimously
calTied, thilt COITcctive f(c5oll1tioll BO-133, relelting to Pptition V-BO-Be. filed
by Vil'qil t-:o rculll , n~l1t:estin(i is' fn))1:~ and real' yard v~riJr1Ces on Lots 11 and 13,
Woodl,lnrl P,ll'k. 1)(; adopted. said I~esollltion repedl in'] I~csolution 80-105 which
cont,lilH'd all CITor dllll ,In ollli';c,ion,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
-k
*
BOji; 054- r";f 1.91
*
80~JK 054 PAGE 194
,July 29, 1980
RESOLUTION 80-134 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCE
9~~.Q.~_2i_~.LOCK 27~, UNIT 8, MARCO BEACH - ADOPTED
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by COITl/rissioner Wimer and unanimously
c,ltTif!U. thaI. Resolution 80-1.'34 to recover funds expended by the County to ilbate a
[lublic nlJisanu~ on Lot 2, fllnck 277, Unit fl. 1~3rCC Beuch. owned by Victor
Hodgson, be Mloptcd.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOO:< 054 PACt 196
July 29, 1980
RESOLUT! ON aO-l35 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPE:'u .~ 3Y COUNTY TO ABATE PIJBLIC
NU [SANCE ON LOT 1, BLO.CE.]3~..L:L WIReD BEACH - ADOPTED
Commissioner AI'cher moved, seconded by Commissioner \1imer and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 80-135 to recover funds eXDended
by the County to abate a publ ic nuisance 011 Lot 1, I3lock 79. Unit 3,
t,I.1l'CO 1",<1(:11. Dlm,'d by II(Milnl '..I, Fidler, be ad'Jpted,
*
..
i
I
I
I
!
1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
600,~ 054 PAGE 198
July 29. 1980
RESOLUTION 80-136 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDEO BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
!1!JLS!\!~~FcJ1!I_JJ:l_l'..12.L-'!.!JlS.K 1 ~_.l~ARC_O f3E!>CH UN IT 4 - ^DOPTED
Commissioner ^t'cher maven, seconded by Conmissioner Wimer and
1I11,lnimollsly carried, that f~esolution [l0-1~6 1:0 rccover funds expcnded by
the COIJllty to .lb,lte a publ ic nuisance on Lot 27, Block 122. Harco Bcach
Uni t t). owned by Lea En~n<ll1('el. he adopted.
*
*
.,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
MOK 054 PAGE 200
.hlly 29. 1980
RESOLUTION 80-137 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
NUiSiliKE ON LOT 10, BLOCK 122, MARCO BEliCH UNiT 4 - ADOPTED
Connni ss ioner Archer moved. s2conded by COl11mi ss ioner Wimer and
unanimously carried. that Pesolution 80-137 to recover funds expended by
the County to abate a public nuisance on Lot 10. Block 122. Marco Beach
Unit IJ, property o\'lI1eo by .lc,1n Kohler. bf" ,l(lllpted,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOOK 054 P,^_A)/)I}
I,....t~
July 29, 1980
RESOLUTION 80-13B TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
ii.UJji\NCE Q!~l,gl}, BLOCK 122, r'll\RCO BEACII UiUT 4 - ADOPTED
Convlli,sionr:r' Archer moved. seconded by Commissi0ner ~Iimer iJnd
IJndnilllously cdrril'd, that Resolution 80-138 to recover funds expended by
t.he COIJnty t.o ah,It~I' ,} pIli,] ic nuisance on 1.01. 9. Block 122, Marco [3r:Jch
Uni t '1, cvlned by Rupert Indak, be adopted,
*
*
*
"
*
*
.,.
*
*
"
*
BOOK 054 PACE 2.04
July 29, 1980
RESOI.UTION 80-139 TO I~ECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED llV COUNTY TO AllAH PUllLlC
NUISANCE ON LOT 15, BLOCK 77, UNiT 3, MI\RCO iSLi\ND - I\DOl'TED
Commissioner Archer moved. seconded by COlTVnissioner Vlimer and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 80-139 to recover funds expended
by the County to abate a pub I ic nuisance on Lot 15, lllock 77, Unit 3,
~\<lrCO Island. owned by Caledonia, Inc" be adopted.
*
*
*
..
*
..
..
..
..
..
n54 ...... 0"
BOOK U PACE..G 0
July 29, 1980
RESOLUTION 80-140 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
~.lLL~NCE,J2.tU...9J-2,_Jl.'=.9_C~!L~L-UNl,L.L,---1:1!\i\CO I SU\fW - t,DOPTCD
C:olllf1lis<;ioner Archer '~oved. o;econded by COrTTllis<;ioner ~Iimer and
ul1dllirnously carried. that Resolutioll 80-\'10 to recover funds expended
by th~~ COllnly to ,1b,lte ,1 public Iluisance on Lot 'I, Block 178, Unit 7,
1";lI-cO Island, owned by Kurt InC]erbrand, be adopted,
*
*
*
*
..
..
*
*
*
*
*
BOGK 0.54 pl.Gf2,()8
July 29, 1980
RESOLUTION 80-141 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
NUISANCE ON LOT l, IILOCK 11U., UNlT 7)_ HJ\RCO BEACH - ADOPTED
Conrnissionr.r Archer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 80-141 to recover funds expended by
the County to all<lte d publ ic nuisance on Lot 1, Block 183, Uni t 7,
Marco Beach, o\olf1ed by .lul j,1 Leibig, be adopted.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOOK 054 PAGE liO
July 29, 19130
RESOLUTION 130-142 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
~IJISANr.F ()N_!J1.I_~.J2!O(K SS, MrlRCO [SLANO UNIT 2 - ADOPTED
Commissioner !\rchf'r moved. seconded by Commissioner Wimer ilnd
unanimously carried, that Resolution 80-142 to recover funds expended by
the Coullt.y to ahate ,1 publ ic nlJisance 011 Lot 6, Block 55, i~arco Island
Unit 2, owned by Wi] I iam G, Kuhn. Jr" be adopted,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOOK
054- PACE 212
July 29. 19130
RESOLUTION 80-143 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
f:I.h!l~ANCE Oru.OUQ.,~LOCK 183 , UNIT 7, MARCO BEACH - MOPTED
COnTllissioncr Archer moved, seconded by Corrrnissioncr Himer iJnd
unanimously carried, that Resolution 80-143 to recover funds expended
by County to dbate a publ ic nuisJnce on Lot 10. Block un. Unit 7,
~l,ll'CO Be,lell, Ill-lIIet! hy lIal'vey DlIhalll t, be adopted,
*
*
*
*
..
*
*
*
*
*
";''-''1,1.
--...........---.-..-..-- '. -........--.- -....--..--...----.....---..-- ,--.....--.---.
B08i Q54. pw1J4
July 29, 1980
RESOLUTION 80-1~4 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENOED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
NU I~!:!..CE _0.!:!..J:2T__'l.!_.12l:_0.C~~I!._lJ!!rl__!..L MARCO REAS:!!_-~.9.~_
C')llImis;ioncr ^rchcr moved. seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
unanimously c,uried, thilt Resolution 80-1~~ to recover funds expended
by the County to ,1b,lte ,1 publ ic nlli Silnce on Lot ~, Block 368, Unit II,
Marco Beach, owned by Mark Q, Rruce, be adopted,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
I
I
I
I
I
, \
.~ _ h._ _..__
. .___._..__.__...__.....__ M___..._._..._~___..____-'. ..-~.....'.._..-_.._._.....
BOOK 054 PAGE 21.6
July 29, 1980
RESOLUT!ON 80-145 TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
NUISMjr.;..E~N~...JB,OCK 45, UNIT 4, NAPLE::; PARK - MOPTED
Cornrnissioner Archer moved, seconded by Comr;]issioner Himer and
unanimously carried. th,lt Hesolution 20-145 to recover fund$ expended
by tile County to abate a publ ic nui$ance on Lot 7, Block 45, Unit 4,
Naples Park. owned by Michall Angeloff, be adopted.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
'e'oox 054 p/,sE2JB
July 29, 1980
WAltR AND ~tWI:.R i"AC1Ll fitS ON Uut11NlCA LANE OF LELY BAREFOOT BEACH UNIT 1 -
ACCEPTED r.oB-il\'JNERSJi~[ NTENANCE AND OPERflTION BY COUNTY WA TE_R- SEWER 0 I S rR [CT
Pursuant to staff recommendation set forth in Executive SUllTTlary dated
July 16. limO, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner 13rown
,Ind unanimously cMried. that the [Joard approve the acceptance of the water
and sewer faciliti,'s lying within the public right-of-~IilY or dedicated case-
mcnts of D<lI1,;nica 1.,111e, ~lithin I.ely l3arefoot l3eacll Unit 1. for o~mr:rship,
m,lintenance and o[lcration by the County Water-Sewer District.
CHAIRM/\N AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
RELATED TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTY WATER TREATMENT AND TRANS-
MISSION FACILITIES
Com~lissioner Wimer moved, secorlded by Commissioner [Jrown and unanimously
calTied, Lholt the Chairmiln be authorized to sign the Agreement [Jctween Col1 ier
County and Cllzr.I IIi 11 Southeast. Inc. for engineering services related to the
design and construction of the County water treatment, transmission and
distribution faciliti,~s. pursu'lnt to the staff recommendations set forth in
the ExecIILi'I': SUnl!lldl"o/ dated July 16, 1980.
*
*
*
*
*
*
o'
*
*
July 29, 198U
BOARD AUTHORIZES AND APPROVES ACTION TAKEN RE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO PROCEED
TO CONTRACTOR FOR WILLOUGHBY ACRES WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WHICH IS
fL~~TIVE JULY 21, 1980
Pursuant to brief explanation by Utilities Division Director Irving
Berzon, as containl'd in the Fxecutive Summary dated July 17, 1980, Con1l1lis-
sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously carried,
that the Board approve the action taken with regard to the issuance of the
Notice to Proceed to the Contractor for the Willoughby Acres Water and Sewer
Improvements, which is effective July 21, 1980.
CHAIR~V\N /\U1HORIZED TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO, 2 FOR THE \'IlLLOUGIII3Y ACRES
WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL $74,484,80
RE MITCHELL & STARK
_._---
Cormissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously
carried, that the Ch,lirman be authorized to execute Change Order No, 2. in
the amount of $74,484.80, re ~1itchell & Stark, with regard to the Willoughby
Acres Water and Sewer Improvements project, as set forth in the Executive
SUlIlIIary dated July 17, 1980, This increases the total contract, including
this and previous Change Order to $381,906,30.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BOO~ 054- PAGE 28f
':.'-'\'.
~O~K
054 rm234
July 29. 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT BO-131 TI~NSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO COMPLY WITH POSITION
CLASSI FICATION PROl,RAl-1 RE COUNTY WATER SERVICE - OPERATING ., ADOPTED IN TIlE
~!j9~~lJlL$]?..5______, ______ -________________ - ---
Commissioner \1imer moved, seconded by Commissioner llrown and unilnimously
carried, that Gudget Amendment 80-131 transferring funds from Contingencies
to comply \~i th Pos i tion Class i fication Program adopted by the Goard re
County Wdtcr Scrvicc-OpcriltinC]. be adopted in the ilmount of $575.
nOilHD OF COlJN'rY CO;'H.lIS~10Njm~~
cor,r.:[)m COUNTY, FLOHr!)/\
n lJ D GET
^ 11 END !'1 E N T
I-'.\':[ n(~q~l i_!~(~:; 1\0,. nl "pprOV(1.l.
D !.:!~~:~~_!~_'2L Hcqn-LJ:c llOil)~d ^pp)~OVill
(t.rilll:;J:e:r. loJil:hin object. COth,: :\.-,wge:)
FUND
I
.--.---.-.-..--------.
.-------.----------.------;-..------------;
I,
I
1
I
IJ
COUNTY W^l~R .S~WKR DJ5T. ._
---------_....- ---------...-----
DEl'T. ,COlJN'J.:'( \'IA:rr::R SE1~V-0I!ERi\TING
DESCRIP'l'IOl'I:
,
,
Tl:i1l1:~[('r of' rlll1f~:i [tom ConL.infjcnctcs 1:0 t:ll<~ I:l1rcc P,,YI:011 l.in(l itcm"
li,;led be 10\.' ill <Jl-d"r. (-.0 cOIl'lJ1Y'\oJith t11" ['o'jil~i()n Cl.il:;!;ifi.ccltion l'l:o'jl:am
adoi.)tcd by the 130anl of County COJ11missioncci.
T\I'l'i<OVEIl flY Till': 1101\1(1) Of' COUNTY CO~l1H~;~;TONER~; ,TUNE ,17, 19110.
TO (I r~(; r:c,' sO") :
I<C<]ul., r S.::l 1.1 r~ ie s
Social Secur.ity Mntchin<]
Het.ircment Contributions
401-533-1-20-5J-021-120
401-533-1-20-51-021-210
401-53J-1-20-51-02~-220
$
t\9G
33
I\G
Totu1
$
575
FHor~ (Sourcc or [-"lII1C},;)
c.:ontin<]cncies
1\01-533-1-20-51-021-990
$
575
-~~.~ ~::€ ;,~~l:~~:Ji~:~;~-~l--~~-~j~:'~~,~-I~~:i ;;;:j'-=~~~;~ ~:-~-:i:(>~c;~-~~~t:-~-::~~~~~~I~:::-~;J7~~~~, 7~~- ,
I:?;} I ' t"..M,_
J)dle:E~ ~2~J:_({.-(jq,_ .~:L~: --'!J..29L~9______ No_ 80-131
DI~TIUTlUTION: ' 'L7 110ill:t1 nccor<ls (ori~in"ll . .r/ 1\cconllt'.n~ 11l'p,n:trn(>;)t.
L7 Fi~;cill Officer' T7 PLlrc.:h,l:;.in~ (1.'l"ip;"':l1l.. (Jilly)
L~7 nr:p;n:trnpnt:(,;) T,ff:cctc.:<l T7 Hlld~ct: l\l1illy:;t.
';',"
..,.,,; ~.!
"
"
"
.1
i
il
I
'I
:1
,
,
July 29, 1980
I3UDGET ^MENDI~ENT 80-132 TRAljSFEIl FROM CONTINGENCIES TO COYER COST OF STORI~
SIIUTTERS FOR COURTIIOUSE COMPLEX RE OTHER GENERAL ADt~IN. - ADOPTED IN TilE
^MOUNT OF $~
Connnissioner ~~illler mov()d, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried
5/0, th,lt llurJuet ^mendment (\0-132, transferring funds from Contingcncies
to cover the cost of storm shutters for the Courthouse Complex, re Oth~r
Gencnl ^dmin., be adopted in the amount of $6,995.
r>Di\HD OF COtiNTY COj'1i.jIS;;:rOl~En~..;
COr.LIEl< COUNTY, Jo'r.OHID!1
n II D GET
A MEN D MEN T
2Y HC:J\ii!.',,~s 1\Oi11:<1 1I1'p':oVi\1
L7 !~()~~.c;~2~:!: Hcq\l:i. n~ DOil'J:d lIpp1:ovill
(tl:ilnsfcr \."il:hin ob:iect code ).'L\il9C)
FlIND .__"~I~~~~0~,_._,_,_____-,_,_.,, ___ ,DEPT.. ,OTHER GENEHAL ADMINISTHATIVE --I
-----------.-.------ .-.-----.-------~----.~------.---- -.._____J
DESc:rUPTJO:-.J :
'\
~
Tl'ill.1~;rcr of flll\ll~; r,'om Cont'..i.n(Jenci(~s to Improvernent.~; t.o l3ui1dincjr> to
CO\'l~l: co~;t of ~;t.()rln :;hLlU:c~c; for the CO\\l'tho\\sc Complex,
APPIWVI.;I) BY Till: BO^HJ) OF COUNTY CO;li.1ISSIONEHS JULY ll, 19BO,
TO (Incre,l :;(~) :
:1mpt'Ovcmcnt:; to 1.'.uildin,,:;
001-)19-1-00-0)-010-6).1
.Ljj..! 99:'
FfW;.j (Source or Fund:;)
Con t.i.n<:V:J1c.ie:;
001-519-1-00-05-010-990
L.2..0l.2,~
:-.-=:::::~.:.:: :':-::-::.'':::~ ::::.-.:::::::.::: :..:.'- .__n.. .. . .:-'::-:.~=-::=-:::-:-=---=::==- =' '.." .~:':-=::::::.~-=:: .:.-=~::___ ___=:.-- ='.::.:::=-"':'::::-: . I I
D;.c ,..,:;c.11 Of f 1Ct'J:t~Oilnl of CO\lIdy Co,mn. f11Jll(,l:'j' lI~lI:r\'i),11
I\l';j"iF'/;J;:J-(!(f ^]'r>1:ov,,:t:
Dd~,c::7-;U(_:tI:) Dille: 7/29/rJO No. ~O-132
-- -------- -. -----
Coun,:y ]'i<:;r/n:iv.
lIPPJ:ov;il:
-----
)),11:(: :
D:r.~;'nnlarI'JCN: . 'L7 ]I('i'1:<l Hecor<l:; (ori<jit'ill)
(,J 1-'i"<':il1 Officer '
LJ J)"pill:t'n!'nt(~) J\ff:ect,c.c1
. .0 11(:(:0\111 t i n<j DCl'''1: t.ru,,;o::
D Purc:!Jilsin9 (Equipment Only)
n l1uc1<jct: 1\n1l 1)':; t
BOO,~ 054 PACf235
"'i'"
i
!
.
I
I
,
1\
, ,
I'
BOO~ 054 PAGE 236
July 29. 1980
DUDCET AMENDMENT 80-133 TRANSFER FROr~ CONTINGENC I ES TO COMPLY WITH ros IT I ON
CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM RE SEWER SERVICE AREA "A" OPERATING AND MANAGEMENT -
^,)OP1l~~.1l~_A!10UNT OF J381
COl1l11issioner Wimcr moved, seco"ded by Commissioner Brown alld unanimously
carried, th,lt Iludqet Amcndment 80-133. transferring funds from Contingencies
to comply with Position Classification Program re Sewcr Service A,ca "A"
Operating and ~1,lna'Jcmellt, be ,ldopted ill tile amount of $381,
nOh~n OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COllN'i'Y, FT.OIUD/\
n lJ D GET
^ 1'1 [ N D !'1 E N T
Lv;;.< nl'qlli:~~,; Do;n'(l ''ll[\):ov,:l
D !~~~L No~ HCC]ll1.r<: !lo,lnl /lPP'coVi11
(tr<ll1~ fer. 'vi l:h.i. n (lb:j cc I: COlle r.i.1 n':Je)
. .. "
---_.._---------_._----------~~- ----~-~---------'---------------------- -
FUND COUNTY h'!\TEI.~/s!';I'nm
SEI'IEH SEHVICE ^I~E^ tl -
OPEHiYL'ING & H^N^CEi'II';NT
DEPT.
, ,
------.---.---------.-.-------
])1,5(: I1TPTTOo\),
\
,
'l'rilnsrcr or f.'l1llcl,,"[p)m Contillgcncies to the thre(~ Pil"!J:oll line item,;
li!~t~.~d h(~lo\" III ordl~l' to cnmpl~' \oJ.it~1 LIH~ PO:Jil~it)n Cl,:,:;~;.i fi(~':ll:,i()n Pro(Jraln
i1doptccl by the Bo,1t:cl or County Commis"ioncr~;,
,\I'PHCVED BY TilE OO,\lm OF COUNTY COI'1HT~;SlONEHS :rUNE 17, .1 ')00.
TO (Incrci1se):
Re<]ular SiJliJrie~;
Social Security Mi1tchin<]
Retirement Contributioll';
~01-5J5-1-20-52-01~-.120
~OI-5J5-1-20-52-01~-210
~Ol-5J5-1-20-52-01~-220
329
22
30
$
. 'l'otv.l
$
381'
FHOM (Source of Fund~)
Contingencies
~Ol-5J5-1-!0-52-011-990
$ 381
---
---
~;~~1~,;;~~:ff;;~::_O- f7t~1~I:~~-rI~~:;:~~(~~';;~~"c~';;:,;-'~~;:"- ^;,,;,
I);) Lo, ; "'/i-v Dd (o!' r ~'t=,-f;) Dale: 7/ 2'.l ~_~O_~ ,b 80-133
DIs'l'lnnUl'IoN: ' 'D 1\0<1n1 n"conh (oci.~lilli)l) 'n lIcc:onl1[:jn'~ llcp,n:Lm~'"l:
, D Fi'.>cill Officer' D P\lr.<.:lIi)sil\~ (Eqllip""l\t', 0;11y)
V DCpilrtln~nt(~;) l\ffcclc<l .n llu<l'Jel: l\nilly"t
;.\;,.,.
~ '
I
:1
'\
July 29. 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-134 TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO COMPLY WITH POSITION
CLASS] FICATION PROGRAI~ RE UTILITIES ADMIN. - ADOPTED IN THE At10UNT OF $784
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously
carried, that Bud~et Amendment 80-134, transferring funds from Contin~encies
to comply with Position Classification Program re Utilities Admin.. be
adopted in the amount of $784.
DOAltD elF COl;NTY CO;.l~1:[SS:[or:]~1IS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLOHTDl\
H 11 D GET
^ MEN n MEN T
@ )U'C;t1i :J:" HOur(l l\pp.':a'.',-,l
. D !20.(.:~;O t. J<C:l\LL rc nOilrd l\pprovil'
(t,(,;ln~;fer \"'),"l:hin bbjecl: eo(h: r<lnge)
FUND ~_.UT:rr.TT..~hl::r..":'..,-_lI~-,~lJN~-,-_,-,
,DF1'T.' 'UTn~I:TrES lIDMINTSTRlITION
--- ------.-.---
DESClnp'I'TON:
Trans(er o( funJn (rom Continencies to the three pi1yroll line items
lir.tec1 b(:low in oukl' to comply'with the position C1i1ssificiltion proCJrui11
adopted by the !loi1rel of County Commissioners.
lIFPHOVCJ LW 'I'm; flOi\fW OF COUNTY COj'lMISSIONERS JUNE 17, 1980.
TO (Incn~use):
n c 9 II 1 i\ r S u 1" r i (' s
Social Security 1-1L1Lchil)(]
Het-iremen L ConLr j bu Li(Jn~;
510-536-1-20-50-010-120
510-536 1-20-50-010-210
510-536-1-20-50-010-220
$ 677
~5
62
Total
$ 78~
FROM (Source of Funds):
Contingci1cy'ncscrvc
L..2!2i
510-536-1-20-50-010-999
1~;:~~~~\1~:~:~...~~;~~~~1r~;~..[-r~:::Tv~r~'~~~-1;(;- C:)~~~':;~ ~'-D~~~J;~-~~~,)
~~~~:.;jlffy ________ ~,~:~~'::i~1-.{-O'~._.~t('~---.-?/.3.2L~~--- No. 80-136
1J1ST[LdIlITION: "L! lIC>ilnl n"c(Jn'~' (Ori':)i".,l) 'ff 1'.ccC>lInt:,,,':J DCl-',":tro',',,::
;::1 Fi"<':i\l O[f.icer' D l'\1rchi\sin':) (E(lllip:n"n\, O;,ly)
V D('p;,rtlO,,,,t(!;) 1\ ((c:ctl'" 17 l\lltl'Jct, l\ni\'y~t
BOOK 054- PAGE 237
.. ~;..'
~.
BO~~
054- PAGE 2.39
July 29,
,"n"
I ~ov
mlnGFT AMENDMENT 80-135 TRANSFER FROM CONTINGENCIES TO COVER COST OF PURCI~ASE
OF VOT!l'l.G MACI! I tiES RL.5.UPERV [SOR OF ELECTIONS - ADOPTED I N THE AMOUNT OF g, 525
Conl1lis:;ioncr \-lime::' r~Jv('d, scconded by Commissioncr nro~m and unanlm!-:Isly
carricd, that nudget Amcndment 80-135, transferring funds from Contingencies
to covcr thc cost of thc purchasc of Voting Machines re Supervisor of Elections,
be adoptcd in thc amount of $3,525,
J',O^HIl 01> COUNTY CO:1t'Il~;S LCJNJ:nS
COr.t,T.EH COUNTY, FLOH.ID^
T3 lJ D GET
^ MEN D M F N T
r7J
LJ HC<j\1iT:C~; llo;Jnl ^:'[J1:OV.11
LJ ~oc.:!.....!~lot HC!([llire BOill:c1 ^pprova t
(transfer l'l.lLhin object: coue r.Jngc)
FL~"~-~~~"'~_ "_ -~:_~-O~":- . _ D'P~~ SU:~R~~m':~">ECT roNS"_-=:=J
DESCHTPTION:
')
Tr(lnS['2!."
to CQVCl- sost
of funds [rom Conl:i.ngcncics to Otlkr ['1.I<:hinc'ry E, Equi[lmcnt
of ,lddition,ll Votol1latic Volin'] ~1;Jchine5.
PHl':VIOUST.Y ^I'PI,OVI-:rJ In TilE !lOAH!) OF COUNTY CO "'11>-1 r:SSIONlmS 5/20/80.
TO (Incn~a5e):
Other [OOlachincry &. Equip.
001-519-5-00-18-010-643
U, 525
PROM (Source of Funds)
Contingencies
001-519-1-00-05-010-990
~_ 3, _5 2 5
I
------- - - . J
CO.\lll ty N'J. r- /[)~.'~-~.--I)~-l'. -JFi SC,l]- 0 f Li ~-OJB()iH'd of Coun ty COI11I11. ~CJUI)C;l~'i' ^1>-I!:,,:,),.i
l\[)proval: (, (;;--- ^Ppq~Vi!'): ~;1 J\PDJ.'OVill: i
>,('.' .,/, C _^ ." t' t".J, /'. ,...J_<--~. I
( -.. . ~ I/;;~ . j;oI- I
D,) !:C :J _ ;J ,/ - r-,) Ildt:c'~ .,' 1_ u., /(') [)il to: 7/29/130 No. SO - 13 5 I
__.___J_-1______~_ .___~-_.l:-:L---- ______________________ _____
nJ~;'fnlllllTlON: L7 110\ln1 R....CUld~; (OJi"j.ifldl) ~D ^,cCt)\II\Lill~J DC!J'll.'lmL'lll
r7 Fi,-;<;,ll Officel' n I'urch,,,,;in<) (Eljlli1"n'-'nl Only)
D Pepartment (r.) ^ffcclc{l r7 J'\llc1'J,-,l IInaly';l
Rev.I?/l7/'/9I1LlI -'
"~;;'.,~ .
July 29, 1980
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-136 TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO COVER COST OF DEHUMIDIFYING
fQlJ..l.E.f:lENT RE BUILDING MAINTENANCE - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $180
Commissioner Wimer moved. seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
carried unanimously, that Budget Amendment 80-136, transferring funds
to cover the cost of purchasing dehumidifying equipment re Building
Mainten~nce. be adopted in the amount of $180.
B01\ED OF COUNTY CO;,',HI~;SIONr':I(~;
COLLIER COUi<'~Y, FJ.OJUD1\
n II )) GET !\ f1 F N D t1 F r j T
fY\ I~(,<]ui.n,!~ Bo"nl 1\pprove.l D Doc's Not Reql1i.r<' Iloarcl 1\pproval
(transfer within object code range)
FUN,) GENEH1\L
--~~~---- ---~-----------------
DEPT. BUILDING H1\IN'l'EN1\NCE
OESCHTT'TrON:
"
Triln~'[('r of lunds bC't_\~een SectioT1s to cover cost of purchilse of
dehumidifying equipment in order to preserve supplies ilnd equipment
5ubj('ct to clr.~tC'rioriilt_ion due to high humidity.-
TO (Tncrei\sc):
1\dmin i5tri\t;_on
Other ~;i1clliIlCI-Y ~ I':qU.ll'lllt'IlL
001-519-1-11-08-010-613
-L-!!9.
1"1<.01,1 U;ource of Fund!'):
!vI<lill tCI1~lI1CC SCl'viCt~
Other ~lClchincry " l-:qu ipl1lcn t
001-519-1-11-08-030-613
L180
~.~;~;~.~=-~~-;:::;~f~ :--. ~i::-;~~--'IF.i~~~.ill Offi~~I.'J"-:.l\Oi~tl-~r:--~C;lln ty Comm.
l,,~)nl\"": 1: (: / .'~ ^pPJ'O\;,' I;' J /~_ .1\pproVd 1 :
, f' (' " / C , 'I /1. ~~'.-'
je ( .'----.-...- {''- - -. -----f.-.., J \j V"
_!?~~(~::_~l~LL.:jL.!.__,____. '2'~~=~2..:..~'/-;;".J ,Date: 7/29/30 No.80-136
DI!:THflltITION: rl 1:""n1 Ht'con],: (origin,,]) D l\ccollntill<] DC'j><1rtr.1cnl
7-'7 I. i';Ciil officer n l'llrdlil".i'l<l (E'Juil~nenl Only)
n llej>ill-l.111e'nt(,,) l\[[cct,',l 77 Bl\,l')<'t. l\ni\ly~:t
--_.-----------______ -- ..--.....--------- \~/'\1 l?/l+J/-!<"'liJT,TT --
nUDCE'l' MiEND_
B08~ 054 PAGE 239
-\ -J
~(.
BOOX 054- PAGE 240
July 29, 1980
BUDGET AMENDI.IErH 80-137 TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO PR I Nt: I PAL AND [NTE:\EST OS,JECT
CODES TO /oIORE ACCURi\TELY REFLECT EXPENDITURES RE ?ELICAN BAY I & I I
LIGHTING - A2..0PTE~.IHE AMOUNT OF $23,230
Conlnissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that Budget Amendment 130-131, transferrinf) funds to
Principal and Interest object codes to nv
accurately r8flect expenditures
re the Pelican l1ily I and II Lighting. be adopted in the anlount of $23,230.
110^HIi OF COUNTY COi'.1iolU;c;IONI:11,;
COr.r.IEH COUNTY, FLOrUD^
r U 0 GET ^ MEN D MEN T
G J'(~<JlIirC'~; 110d 1'<1 1\I'l'roval D !~CS No l r.c(ll!i rc nOd rd Approvill
(transfer within object code range)
FUND LIGHTING & BEAUTIFICT\1'ION
I
I
I
I
i
DEPT. PELJC1\N BAY I & II LIGHTING
DE,;CH [PTTON:
'I
'l'r<1ns[cr o[ fund!; (com 1<.ent<11:> and Lea"c~; to Principal iind to
Interest to more) "cc\1r<1tcly re[lect the accollnl.;s to \.,hich char'Jcs
should De m,H1c.
TO (IncreLlsc)
principCll
Interest
1.~1-5~1-1-l2-6~-O~O-71.0
1. ~ 1- 5 ~ 1- :!. - 12 - 6 4. 0 11 0 -7 20
$ lll,750
_1-" ~8o.
$ _Y-L.!:).Q
Total
FHO~l (Source of Funds):
Rentals & Leases - Equip.
$ :2 3_, 2 3 0
1 H - 5 ,11-1-12 - G ,1 .0.10- ,1 ~ 1
I
I
--- - ~=.:::-..:-===--=:--==--===..-::::-===:.:...::::.::=:.---=-.=.:.=::-:,::-.. ..::::.=:=-=::=-..=-:.j
Cou;lly ~i9r/l)iJ'f:ni". Fi~,c,)l offict~r I13o"rcl of COlln!)' COl11ffi. !\(),ICl':T ^1li:':;;.:
lIppr9va,1:;J I /:': 7\p;wnv,)lj: A:)nrovd] : I
( LULtLt._ _,,-'/ii' -- - :/f../:;.,;J2-~
D<1l'.~ -7. '1_ f \.; Dd(;-): J ,~~t-~::(j Da lc: 7 /?9~ SO __.___ ~():_, ~0-13 7 I
DISTRIllUTION: n DO,1n] Rccorclc; {Original} 'D IIccO\1ntin<j Department
77 Fi'.;cal Officer T7 l'\lrch"sing (I:q\llpmcllt: Only)
77 Department(,,) IIffected n Burh]ct: IInillYCit
Ikv .P/l1/7911!.!! __J
~r,~.:
July 29. 1980
BUDGET AI~FNDMENT 80-138 TRANSFER OF FUNDS BETWEEN OBJECT CODES TO I~ORE
ACCURATEL Y REFl.ECT EXPENDlTIlRES RE WATER W'NAGE11ENT - ADOPTED IN TIlE
A~10UNT Q.E.i40, 000
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
1Jnanimously carried, that Budget Amendment 80-138, transferring funds
be tlveen 0 bj ee t codes to mo re ace ura te 1 y re fl ec t expend itu re s re Wa ter
Managcment, hc adopted in the amount of $40,000.
DO]\[(ll en> COUNTY CO;.liH0~jl()mm:.;
COT.T,TEIt COUNTY I 1'1Jon11)ll
n II 1) GET
Al1r::ND!'1FNT
. r~:r l"""'j.,.,.,c. Brun'! lI],I.:),''''.()'i,!<lI,
/;-:..i< .\. '.1"---. --.... ,
D !~(~~':L2'10~, np(jl'oll (~ )}oiJril lIpp);oval
(triln:>J:cr Holl:l1in objecl: co,le:; ~,(1l9~~)
\- ':ND=~:,:J'~,. ~~~~'!l~":~~~~~-~~- Df.:~. .~l~:;~.M:~:GI"1ENr. _~
DE~;Cr:TPT.rON :
\
\
'1'0 transfer funds' to more ilccurilLe]y reflect current expenc1itures.
TO (Tncrc,l:;c):
Imp:o\'cmcnts Other' Uliln 1l1d'J:;.
EngincerinCJ Fcc~,;
110-537-1-12-57-060-630
110-537-1-12-57-080-315
$ 20,000
20,0'00
Total
$ 40,000
FRO;.l (Sour.cc of FuncJ~o) :
Eng i.ner~r in') Fe(~,';
ImjJl'ovemcnts Otl1er tl1dll DId'):;,
110-537-1-12-57-060-315
110-537-1-12-57-080-630
$ 20,000
20,000
Total
L40, 000
C;:1~~W:;I;~:~1};(lI': ;~.:c ~7J:~:w~;~~m~7~::~::r(;;;;"~I;~;';~;'~-f~;i:j,.^;,;;;, , .
.!2''.:..~~_l._l~_,__ ___ _D<ll c :~,2!e::1!,~_l)'J\ C '-_J /29/80 INo. 80-138
r-rsT;:fJW'J'JON: ' 'D )l""t,l Hco(;orrl:.; (ori<j:inill) .n lIGGOl1l1t:!\l~J lJep,";t,IO""t:
D Fi"cnl off.jeer' n J'Ilr'cl!,\f>1.119 (I:;<lll1l':n(:lll'. Only)
l~1 JlclJ;'rtrn"llt(~;) Jlf(cct:c{l /7 lJ\lcl<Jr:l; JI\lilly~:t
BO~K 054 PAGE 2.41
:: ~l~'
----- -,~- --~_. --_._--_.__._------~---_._- --._._~........-
BOJK 054 PAr.f Z42
.
July 29, 1980
BUDGET ^HENDI1nlT 80-139 TRI\NSFER OF FUNDS TO COVER COST FOR PURCHASE OF
~[Cfl[T^RI^L CflAIR [1E PUBLIC SAFETY ["VIS[ON - ^DOPTED IN TIlE AMOUNT OF j1.OO
COl1lnissioncr Wimer moved, scconded by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that l3udget Amcndment 80-139, tran5ferring funds to
covcr the cost of the purchase of a secretarial chair re Publ ic Safety
Division, be adopted in the amount of $100,
HG1\1\D OF' COUN'i'Y CO~'ll'''I!.;::;:rOi~EHS
COLt.n~n COUNTY I FLOHIJ)l\
B 11 D GET ^ l'1 E N n !'I E N T
/07 ncq\l.i2~0:-; lloilnl 1'.r'p.>:OVi'J. D Dc>'(:::;~_~.)o~:. n(:(Jllire JJui:rd ^pprov...,.
(t,r:l.n,~;,fc.r ."Iil:,h,:i.n :<,b.JcC,l: codp.. ril,n9(~)
k:DR"~::~~~; ~=-_:-_n _=,~-c-~:c=~~DrPT~_ I'UU;~C:;~I;;~-~_~r 5 ION _-=____ _
,
'\.
,
. Tr,'1Ii~~rcr of 'funds fi:om nC<Jular Sill.:ll:ie:; to Office Equipment
i1nd Flln1.it'.11l:C (:0 provi.dc [<;IT: the co~;l: of ;1 sccn:'lilri..1 chilir.
1'0 (Incre.."c):
Office Eql1ipIn(~nl: & Furniture
00l-5/.9-1-13-2G-OI0-6~2
$ 10~
FROM (Source of Funds):
R6gul,ilJ: Salilries
001-529-1-13-2(,-010-120
.$ 100
-~~~:'~~~,/ir/~{.I~I~)'~/ ;-;';:~:::-':]:' ~~:~~:~~;i-~ r:;~,tr--l~~;~~~:~-~ ~~;~~~I~~--~~~;~~~;'J~~=-~~~2~'~-~~:=::;":'
( () /LI.:/':', - . [I.' ,- '1. f.~ frr .1.........'.
" L- /"\'11 , ~ r""
J!~~~_ ~) ,1 -( , /~,) :)'1l.e ::.L _ /., ,/. ~=-. Dill.e: 7/2 9J SO~_ _~ i~.-:~? -13 9 __'
D:r~'l'JnJ)UTIO~I: '/.."7 lloilr<l ncconh (OriS/i.n,.l) '/7 l\cc:olll1t:il1S/ f)cp<>t't rn""t
Q Fi~;ca.l. Officer' 77 1'11l:c11ar;il1S/ (1;(l',i.p:ni'll~. Only)
U Ikp,":tnwnl:(") lIff:ccl:ccl T7 lJ\Hl<j(,t: llllitJ.y'--'t
'.~~'"
I:
I I
I I
i
I
I
; ,
, ,
; i
!
July 29, 19BO
BUDGET AMENDMENT 80-140 TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO VARIOUS EXPENDITURE LINE ITEMS
SO PAmENT CAN BE TRANSACTED LOCALLY RE HEALTH OEPARTI1ENT - ADOPTED IN THE
AMOUNT OF $1 ,834
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded bi Commissioner Pistor and
IJIlilnimollsly carried. that Budget Amendment BO-lIlO, transfcrring funds to
variolls expcndi ture 1 ine items so payments CiJrl be transacted locally re
Health Department, be adopted in the amount of $1,834.
nO.l,1,,~! UF COUNTY C(Ji'1!~ISSIONER~;
CC'~,L:om COllNTY, FJ.OHIJ)lI
Bl!f.lGET
^ MEN D MEN '[
r.7 1>('("'J'--"'O' 1J,),,','I'
"-.:-3 .'"'.1~..:_..~. ..<I..
/q)p:.'U\':~ 1
L7 .J~:l:~.~~,t:)~ll: nC"q\1:i)'(~ llo,'rc{ Approvill
{trallsfer \~it:h:i.n (lbjccl: cocle r<lll~e)
FUND
c;ENj~81\J,
DEPT.'
" ,
----_._-;-----~~_.
'lII'il\L'l'IJ DEPlIHTMENT
DESCIUPTION:
,
Triln~;fcr of funcl~; to vilriou:; c>:pcnditllre line itcl11~; 'so' thilt pnyrnents
for Lhcs,~ CXi"cllclitlln:~;"r.i111 bl' 111i1(lc thro\l~h 10c,,1 trilnSi,ctions rather thilll
hilv.i.rHj I.li,~m pilid by Stiltc \~ilrrcnt,
TO ([ncrcdsc):
Xerox C:hilrq .:s
["Lie 1 I. [,\1/)r .i.ciln t~;
Hisc. S\lpplicl; or r'I"i.r~C,
H&~l-Veh.i.c 1 c:; -Cn ty ~.; t." J r
001-5G2-8-15-72-010-~71
001-5G2-8-15-72-010-521
001-562-0-15-12-010-529
001-562-8-15-72-010-1,66
Total
$
~OO
910
200
J7.~
LIt 8Ji
f'[lO~l (Source of FlllH{~;) :
Rcmittilnc<:~;-llCil1 tll Dcpt, 001-562-8-15-72-010-812
~_? 1.i
Count:y J.j~ll'//).i.v. Dic
APPf;<>-vi,l: (' _ '\\ \
~ '):S>~>-J.."v----~' ~\.,
D iJ t~~..:~,::~_ _ l. ~ & D
..-- ------------.-------_.. - ."------- ._----.-.---.- ---------.
______________________ _.- ----. ----------..----_.____ ._._________ __u ___.____________
F:LI;Cill O.ff.LCC:r nOi1J:d or CO\IIILy Co;nl~. BUDGE'.i' ^~W'\:'
l\pn)'!(3vit1: t1 -! 1\:))).1:0\1,,1 :
11 :t)- j'r C~~'
~)~lq0i~..:lt{-gv Date: 7/29/80, No.80-1{~0
1.l:!!,;Tl(IIlIJTIOt-l: . 'D ll(lilnl H"(;(>l:,l~; (Or.i~Jini,l)
1_7 ri:;Ci11 OI.Licc!: '
II j)('.Pilrl'M,nt(I;) "{["etc,'
.n J\ecollnl:,iIHj ))"j>i1l:Lm(,;,l:
lJ 1'1Il:dli\"in~ (r:'jllijJ",,,nL O,~ly)
r7 lJ",1<)(,[: J\I1i11y:;t
BD~~ 054 rAGE 243
BOOK 054 PAGE244
,July 29, 1980
8,II':'Er AMEND~\ENT 80-11\ 1 TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM CONTIrlGENCIES TO COVER COST
OF HOSPlTALlZATION OF PRISONERS RE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT - ADOPTED IN THE
t-~'10UNT _QU~ 256
Conmissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Bro~m and llnani-
mously carried, that BudC]et Am' ldment 80-141, transferrin'] funrls from
Contin']encies to cover cost of hospital ization of prisoners re Sheriff
Department, be adopted in the amount of $8,256.
IlO^l~D 01' COUNTY CO<'l;'lI~;:;Tmmn~;
COi,T. [Eft COUNTY, 10'1.0)((1)1\
J3 II D G [ T
f\ f'1 [ II J) !'l [ N T
1,,-1 n~~(i;.:i~:.~~.:.;
;/.y
lip, >::':)',',-,1.
/_7 !:::~(:~:._~:!ot ncqui n, !\o;,r(! ^ppr.-o'Jill
(transJ:er l'lith.i,n ()bjccl: code 1',1;198)
nD,', t'...!
FUND GE1H';HM"
DEPT. ,SIlEHIFI-'
------.-------.---
DEscnTPTION:
l' ran s f: (~r. () f fund~; f: r:om Con t inCjcnc ie s to Phy s ic i ,1n s Fcc~; il nc1
Ilo~;piti11i7."tion to cover cost o~ hO:5pi.Li1li/'ill:ion of: [)risoncr.~3.
TO (Incrcilse)
PhysiciaJ\ Fees
Hos[litalization
001-521-1\-00-27-020-31.2
001-521-4-00-/.7-020-31\6
:;: 51\0
____Z!-2.lJi.
~$ ___f!....25 6
- -
Total
FROM (Source of funds)
Contingencies
001-519-1-00-05-010-990
~-=~,=:~:?.0.
-~~.)~:~;;f,~'l;l~;~.~;-:-~-I;i- l:;~~-l~~~:~~ ;.;.~, ~.l.~.l)~[T~~~~~-1 ;~;::~~:~: v ~ i :-EC:;~~;~ i:;;'c::Jif':';-, -[~U 1.)(;;:::;:;/:;;;::-,
/T I (/\)v~vl ~ /:/) l/ ''<L,-1.,~~'
~~~~:~...?-1__\?v/_~ y 1:____ ~(2:_2 .::2_~t.:.:Jt~I._[:~~_~~~____2L2_9j 80_____ ;'~.?_..~O_-14~__
DIS'l'HIllll'l'ION: 'D BOilnl ncconl~ (Origin;)l) "CllIccount.ill<j DCP,ll:t.r.W;lt.
D Fi<;Ci11 Off.icCl" T1 Pllr:dhl~i n'J (J;'1tl.ip.,,,,,,1. (Jilly)
/7 Dcpilz:tment(!;) lIff',ctcd n Bud']"t 7In<11)':;1.
;oOl. '.
'0,...
'I
,
1
r.. ~...
'"v
July 29. 1980
GUDGET AMENDMENT 80-1~2 TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO PROVIDE BUDGET FOR BALANCE OF
FISCAL YEAR RE COUNTY MANAGER- ENERGY CONSERV. - ADOPTED I N THE AMOUNT OF
.UJ...6 3 0
Cor,missioner Brown movPrt, seconded by Comnissioner Himcr Jnd
unanimously carricd. thdt Gudget Amendment 80-142. transfcrring funds to
provide budget for the balance of the Fiscal Year re County ManJger-Energy
Conscrv, Program, be adopted in the amount of $1.630.
llLJ1\,~D OF COUNTY C:O:,It'ln;!;IO};E[~S
COLLH:H COllN'f\.', FLOHID}I
B 1I D GET
^ 11 [ , D !'1 [ N T
f.;:; J',""l" ",'.': i\r,"I'cl
!-~'Y \. \l '..... ~ . \ l .
l\PI~r c......:~ 1
1~7 !~{!_::.~~ ]~.('.!: Hcq III r r Bail [(1 1\rwrovd :"
(trdn~;J.cr \'Ii Lhin olJjccl: code l'i1T1~je)
f---------. --.----.--------.---.-----------------------.-. .------ -. .___.___0 -- -----.-/
FUND GENE1UIl,' . . _ '. DEl'T., COUNT!' l'\MI^GER - ENERGY CONSr:I<\
--------------.---------------------.-- -----..---------- I
-.--------.----------.-- ---..--------~--..---------- .---------.-------...1'
nT.:s('p'rpt"Tn~ ..
'l'rdl1sf"r of func1s from Other Cor,tri:lctui11 Services i1ncl ContinC)cncics
to provit1c ('xl'cl1c1illln, 1im, items for those services i1nc1 supplies needed
for t:h~ b"lilncc of till' Fiscill YCilr. for the Energy Conservdtion Sectioll
of the COlIn Ly 1>1i1llil,-wr'!; Buc1CjcL,
'1'0 (Tncreil5e):
l'lotor Pool Heimbur~;c1tlcnt
PostilCje, Freight & UPS
Xerox Chilr<)es
''lord Processing
Office Supplies
Pub., Sub!;.. f, J-.lell\l)('r~;h.ip Dues
001-512-1-10-03-030-~03
001-512-1-10-03-030-420
001-512-1-10-03-030-~71
001-512-1-10-03-030-472
001-512-1-10-03-030-510
001-512-1-10-03-030-511
$ 30
70
140
1, 200
140
50
'l'OLid
U..!._~..:~o.
FH01>l (Source of Funcl,~) :
Othel' Contrilc LUill
Call Llll Cj('nc .i(~ s
001-512-1-10-03-030-349 $ 1,375
00]-519-1-00-05-010-990 255
------..
TOtill $ 1,630
________. __.~~_.~_.___. - ____ _________..______.__~ _"__._~_"._____ ____ ._... "U_._____. _.____.___._______~~~.______._..
~~~~~;~:~1~lV:~iD,~5/ 6i';<: ~r~;;.:'l:.~:~~1y~ T~~~~~:.I.~~:;~'~~-~~r:c~~;;~i~y. c~;~;;-n:-kl1i)j)(;J::;f~\~:;:i-l , ,
( ((I/:/U--1-: 10/:,.-- /(1) f':ja....L-....'.. II
..}.:~_(:_~_....i..:....!d.:_L!?,.____.._ ~~l_(~7__,2H.::_A!~_ ~~_~_~'_~~~~/8.~___~ N~,~ 80-14.3.__ i
1>1~'j'll1!1U'j'.ION: . 'L7 Iloi,ul w:conlo; (Or .i~J.iJli1l) . D lIceollnl ~"'J JJC'l','';'LIO'':l1l'. . Ii
1..~7 Fi!:Ci\l off.ic(:r L? PUJ"Chi''''I\<J (l-:Cjl\ll',n?l1l. (l;))y) ~
D I>q>i1rtlO',nt(!.;) lI[re<:t.ed LJ nu(lSWI: lIIl"ly"t _~ ..'. "'~"'" ~
I
}
/
r;cr.v.iccs
B08K (154- PACE 245
eo~~ 054- p,~sF246
July 29, 1980
GOARD AUTHORIZES I~IPLEMENTATIDN OF COLLECTION PROCEDURE FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
ORDERS FOR RECIPIENTS OF PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES, AS PRESENTED BY CHIEF
DEPUTY CLERK
Following brief explanation by Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer
Harold Hall, Conmissioner Wimer moved, secondp.d by Commissioner Brown and
unanimously cdlTied. that the Board authorize the implementation of collec-
tion procedure for the enforcement of Orders for recipients of Public
Defender Services, as set forth in the Executive Summary dated July 28,
1980, and presented by Mr. Hall.
COllYlIissioner' \.Iimer expressed his appreciation to all the staff members
~ho worked so diligently to prepare the subject procedure.
STAFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE AMENDATORY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR NOTIFICATION
OF PROPERTY O.iNERS WilEN REZONING OF PROPERTIES IS CONTEMPLATED; STAFF
DIRECTED TO SEND INFOR~~rION LETTERS TO ALL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES PROPERTY
O\-;t:ERS RE PROPOSED REZONING; SA~,rLE LETTER AND COST ESTIMATE OF r~AILlNG TO
J1.L..P_R-'~3ENTS:D AT J:~EII-'ll!'~~~~ST ~! 1980
COlllllliss iOller' Grown eXfJl'e"eu II i, dt.;~ ire Lo r0verse the action prc-
vious ly takt'n by the BOurd wherein the Buard voted not to noti fy surround-
il',g property o\'lners of u zOlling chunge. It was noted by Plunning Director
Danny Crew that such action would tuke an amendment to the pertinent
ol'Clin<lT1CC, through the Coustal Areu Planning Commission, und the like.
County Attorney Pickworth 'concurred and offered his assistance in the
drafting of such an amendatory ordinance,
COII'lnissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and curried
unanimously, that the staff be directed to prepure a proposed amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance, ilS noted above.
~iscussion followed concerning the proper approach to take in nQtifying
the property owners in the Golden Gate Estiltes area of the proposed rezoning
in that area, including the possibility of enclosing such notice in their
tax bills, I'!r, Crel" pointed out that. due to the cost estimilte of anY~lhere
from $6,000 to $20,000 for such l1Iililings, it would be necessury to have an
appropriate Budget Amendment for this purpose, Since the matter is scheduled
on the agendu for the meeting of August 5, 1980. County Manager Norman
requested that action be deferred.
~,,"(.'
July 2
Conulissioner Brown suggested that the matter of funding could be decided
later on and moved that specific notification of a contemplated zoning change
bc scnt to cach individual owner in the affected area. Commissioner Wimer
s.cconded the motion, wi th the comment that, in his opinion, if the government
is "going to do something to your land, you, as a property owner should
reccive an individual letter" and suggested that an additional informative
letter be included in the subject notice.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/1 with Commissioner
Wenzel voting in opposition,
Mr, Crew advised that he would come back to the Board at the next meeting
with il sample of a proposed letter and an estimate of the costs involved,
REAPPOINTMENT OF PRESENT MEMBERS OF COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION TO
ADDITIONAL ONE-YEAR TERMS EXPIRING 7/29/81 - APPROVED
Administriltive Aide to the Board Mary Morgan noted the receipt of a
letter dated July 6, 1980 from John G. Beriault, Chainnan of the Coll ier
Count,,' Historical Corrl11ission, \~herein it is requested thilt the [loJrd give
continued recognition of the C0l1T1lission as a sanctioned advisory group.
COllttllissioller Willler' PluveJ, secul1lJetl by COllllllissic,.=r [lrown and undni-
mously carried. that the following members of the subject Commission be
reilrrointed to an additionill one-year term, said term to expire July 29, 1981:
1. John G, Beriault
2, ~1rs. Mi 1 dred She:-rcx1
3, C. Lodge McKee
4. Ms, Camille BaulT,gartner
5. A. r, "Bud" Kirk
6, Mrs. L. D. [le5
7, Ms. Mary E. Manion
8, William J. Reagan
TAX COLLECTOR AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATES
TO REPLACE CERTAIN LOST CERTIFICATES
Commissioner Wimer moved. secondetl by Commissioner Pistor and
unanimously carried, that the Tax Collector be authorized to issue
duplicate Tax Sale Certificates to replace lost Certificates, as follOl~s:
PURCHASER NO. SALE
-----
Glenda S. Hayes 895 1977
E, H. Bower Asset Co, 7323 1979
Helmut Hittinger 3456 1980
~Iark G. Lawsoll 2464 1978
BOOK 054 PAGE 247
~;).'
054 PAGE 252
July 29, 1980
CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CERTIFICATES FOR CORRECTION TO 1979 TAX ROLLS
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously
carrie<1. th,lt t.he Ch,lit'll\oln ue duLhurized to sign Cert.ificoJtP.5 for Correction
to t.he Tax Rolls, as follows:
TAX ROLL
NOS,
207-213
DATED
7-9/,'-22-80
1979 Tun9ible Personal Property
REQUEST BY CArC CIIAIR~1AN FOR MEMBER OF LEGAL STAFF TO I3E PRESENT AT MEETINGS -
NO ACl I ON lA.K1.!i.J'~ND lB.G. .REPORT ON FURTHER CONTACT W ITH _Q:!~.!B!iAN WALTERS
COlmty Attorney Donald Pickworth noted the receipt of a copy of a letter
dat.ed 7/16/80 from Chairman William Walters, Coastal Area Planning Commission.
to the 130ilrd requesting thilt the Board provide th<1t the County Attorney or
his Assistant be present at illl of the CAPC meetings. Att.orney Pickworth
requested thilt no actlon be taken unt.il he has the opportunity to discuss
the subject with ~1r'. Walters, adding the comment that, due to the size of
his uffice stdff. wllicli lidS t'ellldilleJ cUllsLdllL sillce 1972. it is lIecessdry to
be select.ive ill t.he arcuS in which they ilre involved,
Chil i rnlJn Wenzel asked that. Attorney Pickworth report back to the Board
following his cOllsultJtion with Mr. Walters.
PETITIONS RE NAPLES PARK LIGIIT[NG DISTRICT - ACCEPTED; NO ACTION TAKEN PENDING
FURTHER REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING POSSIBLE WORKSHOP MEET[NG WITH
_DJSTR.rS~0~_~OCIATIDN! I3CC MEMBERS AND STAFF
Administrative Aide to the Board Mary Morgan advised that petitions
have been received from 217 persons in the Naples Park Lighting District
concurring with the Naples Park Voters League that street lights not be
installed, that the l.ighting District be rescinded. and that the original
referendum, held in 1979 which defeated the District, be honored.
Mr. Red Jones. representing the aforementioned League, addressed
the Board explainino how the petitions were gathered and hand-delivered I)
ConVllissioncr Wenzel. adding that similar petitions were del ivered to
Florida Power & Light Company. He touched briefly on the referendum whi(h
was held on February 27, 1979 and the subsequent discussion with the Board
in April of 1979 during which it was susgested that the District would be
t'escinded. However, said Mr. Jones, a second referendum was held due to
,~,.
July 29. bdO
the fact that the Civic Association in the area convinced the Board that the
flyers circulated by the League were untruthful. It was the consensus of
the Board that no promise to rescind the District was ever made, as alleged.
Public Works Administrator/Engineer explained that after receiving a
petition to not create the District, the matter was scheduled for the agenda
of April 24, 1979 for discussion of disbanding the District. However, during
the public hearing, a request was made that another straw ballot be conducted
which ",,'il5 honored by the Goal-d, and which resul ted in a fdvorable vote on
the District,
Mrs. Stella C, Lilmartine. representing the Naples Park Voters' League,
explained how the petition was circulated and among other comments suggested
that it might be a Illorc fair wdy to sol icit publ ic opinion to petition the
taxpayers instead of only those persons registered to vote. County Attorney
Pickworth said that a strilW vote could be held without restricting it to
qualified clectors.
Ulscussio~ followed concerning whether or not the installation of lights
is il of'tf'rrpnt tn (rim~, the possibility of installing 1 ighh dl street
intersections only, ilnd other like matters,
Chilil'llliln Wcnzel stated that the BOilrd will look further into thc milLter
with the COIJr1ty Staff to provide il solution which will serve the miljority,
suggesting the possibility of workshopping the matter at a Civic Association
meeting
MISCELLANEOUS CORR~SPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED
There being no objections. the Chair directed thilt the following mis-
cellaneous correspondence be filed and/or referred as indicilted:
I. Letter fl'om Tom ~1cDowell, Acting Admin" II, Office of Research,
Develop, and Evaluation, Florida Dept. of Labor and Employment
Security, to Commissioner Wimer, 7/3/80, transfe:-rin'] CETA gl'ilnt
application. xc of material was referred to Mr. Meerpohl ilnd
Mr. Norman for review and response by 7/25/80; filed,
2. Letter dated 7/14/80 from William P. Gregg, Jr., U.S, National
Park Service to Chairmall Wenzel, regilrding President's designation
of 1980 ilS "Year of the Coast", requt' ting executive input to provide
increased protection and promote wise use of coastill resources,
7130/80 xc cover letter sent to Dr, Hannic and ~Ir. Norman, maps,
Congressional Gill #H,R, 5981; filed.
~D:J;~ 054- rACE 2.53
.- '..-~,.
, <
~o~~ 054 PACE 2.54
July 29, 1980
3. Letter dated 7/15/80 from Wayne B. Young, Forest Ranger Supervisor,
Florida Dept, of Agriculture & Consumer Services, to BCC, regarding
Controlled burning in Collier County during period of 11/1/80 through
10/31/81, xc County Mana<]er; filed.
4. Letter from James K,lOwles, 188 Price Street, dated 7/14/80 to BCC
plus physiciiln's certification of total and permanent disability,
regarding inability to pay his assessment for Price Street paving.
7/15/80 xc Mr, Barksdale; filed.
5. Print.ed Notification of Hazurdous l~aste Activity. from Douglas M.
Castle, Administrator. U,S, Environmental Protection A<Jency, Washin<Jton,
D,C" dated 5/15/80, 7/30/80 xc cover letter sent to Dr. Harmic &
Mr, Norman. Accompanying material filed.
6, Complete reprint of EPA regulations dated 5/19/80, entitled "Identi-
fication dnd Listing of Hazardous Waste", from Mr. Ed Cox to BeC.
xc copies of cover to Mr, Barksdale and Mr. Norman; filed.
7, U.S. Dept. of [nt.erior Geological Survey of state of Florida map,
dated 7/80 with information regarding reprint availability, xc Planning,
7/30/80; f i 1 cd .
8. Letter dated 7/18/80 from Jean Kincaid to BCC indicating she would
b~ happy to P.1Y nllisancc aba tement 1 ien No, 141-80 on her property
in Block K, rnomah Subdivision, Lots <] and 10. xc Coul~ty ~li1na<]er
and Zoning Dil'ector, 7/30/80; filed.
9. Lettel" d,lted 7/22/80 from ~1rs, E,M, Holtzendorf, 610 Holly St.,
Waycross, Ga.. to BCC responding to notice of publ ic hearing to
consider petition for a Catholic High School to be built near her
ColI icr County prorerty, xc Plannin'J.
10. Letter d,1ted 7/23/80 from Esther 11. Fariss. Marif~n;ont, Ohio, to BeC
regurding Provisional Use (3) of thr~ "RS-3" District stating she
dces "ot object to the petition for a C.Jthol ie High School near
her rr'o~e).ty; filed,
11. L~A^ Grant 77-A5-09-[801 for the Collier County CJIS Subject-In-Process,
Step 3. r'cduction of Sllbgrant al-lJrd, xc l-lr. H,ll1 dnd "'r, Re<lgan,
7/30/80; filed,
12. LEAA Grant JF-78-09-7701 (78-J6-09-FGOll to the Youth Guidance
Volunteer Prosram, reduction of subgrant, revised budget, xc Mr.
Nonnan, Mj-. Hall, and ~lr. Squatrito; filed,
13, LEM Grant CF-eO-Og-2705 (80-AA-09-CE05) for Special ized Burglary
Enforccment Proqr"am, notice of special condition compliance and
chi1n<]e in <]rant number, xc Mr, Hall and Sheriff's Dept,; filed.
14. Memo dated 7/17/80 from County Manager Norman to Board of County
C0l11nissioners reporting on mani1gement audi t and meeti'lg recently
held with A,T. Kearney. Inc. T"(;presentatives. Also copy of letter
dated 6/27/80, from County ~lani1ger Nonnan to Robert Milne, Vice
President, A,T. Kearney. Inc. stating he is advising BCC not to
accept aforementioned company's February 1980 "Report of the
Management Audi t of ColI ier County Government and Projection of
Facility and Land Use Requirements~ filed.
15, Copy of letter dated 7/17/80 from Wal ter R. HO\o{ard, Secretary,
Devil 's Gdrden Water Control District, to ~'r. Colrling, Property
Apprd i ser, oldv i sing thd t Goard 0 f Superv i sors 0 f a foremen tione '
Distt";ct have set tax rates for 1980. xc Harold Hall and Sam
Colc:,]; filed.
(
;', .~~:.
July 29, 1 ~dO
16. Letter received 7/25/80 fro'~ Donald T. Poll Ht corrrnending Motor
Vehicle Station efficiency and courtesy on his recent visit.
xc Personnel; filed.
17. Notice to bidder received regarding equipment sale 8/12/80, at
Courthouse, St. Augustine. Fl. at 1:30 p.m. from Board of County
Commissioners, Anastasia Sanitary District, St. Johns County, Fl.
xc Purchasing; filed.
18. Letter and qllestionnaire dated 7/7/80 from Lawrence J. Severy, Dept.
of Psychology, Univ. of Florida to Board of County Commissioners,
requesting opinions regarding various deinstitutional programs
by Dept. of Ileal th " Rehabi 1 i tative Service of Florida.
xc County Manager, Social Services, anJ Health Director; filed.
19. Letter dated 7/18/80 from \oJilliam J. Ryan, President, Economic
flevelo;m,ent Counci 1 of ColI ier County, Inc. to Economic Devnlop-
ment Council Members extending invitation to Quarterly meeting of
said Council on 7/25/80 at 4 p.m. in First National Bank lloardroom. Filed.
20. Memo dat,('d 7/17/80 from A. James Meerpohl, CETA Director to County
Manager proposing CETA office h0urs to te 7:30 A.M. to 4;00 P.M.
from June 16 through October 1, 1980. Filed.
21. Memo dated 7/15/80 from County Engineer Cl !fford llarksdale to County
Manager Norman regarding Proposed Schedule--Translt Referendum for
11/4/80 ballot, plus prop05ed schedule dates for same. Memo indicates
the [Joan! of Ccunty Commissioners needs to take action no later than
9/23/80. Fi led.
22. Letter dated 7/14/80 from Douglas r~. Midgley, Publ ic Defender to
Commissioner Wenzel regarding revision of Florida Statutes 27.54(2)
rclilted to f\1!lding for one assista,,: public defender. xc County
Manager Nonnan and Harold Hall; filed.
23. Letter dated 7/22/80 from William L. Jones, Contractors Assn. Of
Collier County to Board of County Conrnissioners regarding Petition
for Change of Comprehens i ve Land Use Pl.t1\ and Re-Zone fi 1 ed by
K. C. Wise, Trustee/Nilples Lumber and Supply Compilny, Inc. xc
County Milnager Norman, Planning, County Engineer; filed.
211. Lcti.2r rlHprj 7/8/80 from Larry /1. McKinney, President, Lan Mac Pest
Control. pl LlC, copy of Coll ier County Heill th Dept. pest cor.trol fee
notice, protesting new fumigation fees. xc County ~'anager; filed.
25. Letter dated 6/20/30 from B)'andt G. Watson, :1irector, Collier
Mosqui to Control District to Harold Hall, enc jJ~ing Certificate
of Budget Adoption and Tax Levy and resolution setting millage
for their Budget Year 10/1/80 to 9/30/81. xc Harold Hall; filed.
26. Copy of letter elilted 7/15/80 from Roy E. Parrish, Florida Dept. of
Revenue, to Property Appriliser Sam J. Colding, plus copies of Mr.
Colding's budget request for period 10/1/80 through 9/30/31, informing
him that he or GOilrd of County Commissioners ma~' submit additional
testimony reqdrding said budget request by 10/8/80. xc Hilrold Hilll; filed.
27. Letter dr1tl~d 7/23/80 from Supervisor of Electiol::; Edna C. Santa to
~\rs. Dorothy (;1 isson, Florida Oeputy Secretary for Elections, Talla-
hilssee, tr'ansrnitting names of qualified candidates for primary
election 9/9/80 in compl iance with Florida Statutes, Chap. 99.092. Filed.
28. Copy of letter dated 6/17/80 from County Engineer ansl'iering Florida
Better Business Div.. re traffic signals synchronization of U.S. 41
to East of 9th St., S.; xc copy of Better Business Division, Coll ier
County resolution re same; xc letter dated 6/2/80 from Better Business
Div., re S,lme resolution to Chairman, [Joard of County Cormlissioners. Filed.
80QK Q54- PAGf2.55
29. Letter- d,1ted 7/15/80 from Lee County Electric Cooperative, Inc., re
acct. #86090020-06 for work done in Marco Lighting District for month
054 wE2.56of 6/80, xc copy tor~r. Barksdale; letter dated 7/15/80 from sam~
'" company re acct. #/~2-434UO-04 re work dune in IlfIllOkalee Lighting
District in month 6/80, xc copy to r~r. Barksdille. Filed.
30. XC of letter of d\lpreciation dated 7/8/80 from Chairman Wenzel to Col.
Ernest H. Dilvis for his leildership and service ilS Cllil jrman to the
Librilry Advisory Board. Filed.
31. Copy of l/EO letter .1nd pcti tion froln resident:; concerned with con-
struction on Lot 22 and Lot 15, Per-mILs 80-1680 und 80-iBfJ3 respectively,
in Block 9, Uni t 2, Lely Tropical; xc copy to COllnty Manilger; fi led.
32. Copy of letter dilted 7/3/80 from vJi'liilln F. Hi 11, HRS, District 8,
Fort t1yers, FL, re Dr. Williilm v/. Cox's ilnnual evaluat.ion. SC copy to
County Manag(~r Norman; sc copy of Dr. \~illiall1 W. Cox's employee
performilnce evaluation dated 7/9/80; filed.
]3. Letter dated fi/?n/SO from Dr. Jean Kohler. Switzr.rland, re legal notice
of Puhlic Nulqnce 1!73fJ7; xc copy to County Milnafjer Norman 7/9/80; filed.
34. Lptter dated 7/ 80 from Dept. of Community Affairs re 701 Grant; xc to
Planning for- response on 7/9/80; also xc copy of 701 Locill Planning
Assistilnce program eVilluiltion, project no. P-1060 not completed; filed.
11emo, 7/15/80 from Com. Develop. Director, Torry Virta and completed
aforementionrd rjuestionnairc, filed.
35. i_tcLL(~r' udLeu 7/2/GO rrolll CI'. ~0bert C. Tober, Medical Director, Ei1'3 tn
Dr. Forrest Hinton re function o~ the Et1T, II's; xc copy to 11r. Hilfner
7/30/80; also, resume from Executive Director, Collier County Mental
Ileal th Cl inic Ron Meserve for cl)nsi~"r,1t.ion as appointee to EMS Advisory
Council, xc c('py to r~r. Hafner, 7/30/80; also, resume for saine Council
from Egon Hill, received 7/22/80, xc 11r. Hafner; filed.
36. Copy of letter dated "1/9/80 fl'OIII Ralpll H. Schulz to Voter Reseilreh "
Analysis Service, Inc., re double taxation in City of Nc.ples; xc to
COllnty t1iln,1<]er; filed.
37. ~1erno (fdted 7/21/80 frtJllI R. L. f'leserve, fxecut. Dil'ector, Col1 ier County
~'ent.al Health Clinic, [,le., )'e ~Ieals-Alcohol Residenti;1l Program
(IlImlok.Jlee I); xc to County Hilnagel', 7/29/80; filed.
38. ~1emo dated 7/23/80 from Commissioner PistOl' to Board of County Commis:;ioners
regilrding non-returnable bottles and beverage cans; xc County Manager;
fi 1 ed.
39. Letter dated 7/8/80 from Louis E. Price, Safety Standards and Training
Administrator, Florida Dept. of Labor and Employment Security re
safety consultive services with which CoIl ier County Compl ies; xc
Mr. Hafner; filed.
40. Letter received 7/17/80 ~om Ernest M. Bays withjrawing previous written
opposition of rezoning lilnd neilr his property on Marco Islilnd; xc
Planning; filed.
41. Letter uated 7/l5/80 from Douglas G. McAusland protesting payment of
waste disposal fee in advance to Yahl Bros. Disposal-Wilste Manilgement;
xc r~r. Barksdale; also, letter dated 7/14/80 from Dwight Olsom, Kitchen
Koncepts, protesting large rilte increase granted Yahl Brothers; xc
County Engineer Bilrksdale; ill~o, xc uf letter dated 6/80 from Ronald
r~urkhilm, Yahl Bros. Disposal to !<itchen Koncepts stating ne\~ price for
services effective 7/1/80; filed.
r
.\.....:
,...;,;,'
July 29, 1980
42. Letter dated 7/la/80 from Robert W. Carlson, Pres., Five County
Duilders & Contractors, Assn., Inc., to Chairman Wenzel, seeking
favorable consideration of rezoning land adjacent to the railroad
in north Collier County to industrial. XC County Engineer Barksdale
and Planning Dept.; Filed.
43. Letters protesting Golden Gate Estates rezoning from: William A. Snelling
Lavone Greuory, /~. Dan Nickel, I~ildren /~oonnan, Ray A. Reese, Carl
Tisch, John A. & Camille M. Doker, Jagdish & Jyotsna Chander, Charles
E. [Jeaucharnp, R. Stimson, Ralph & Dorine lIarshman; xc to Planning. Also,
letter from M. Dan Nickel to [JCC re water elevation in NE~, Sec. 24,
T49, R27. XC County Manager ilnd Pl.:.nning. Filed.
44. Letter dated 7/11/80 from Dermot A. Nee to Chairman, [loard of County
Commissioners re condition of Naple~ Bay. XC Planning, County Manager,
and Utilities; filed.
45. Note dated 7/12/80 from Marie and Richard Erickson opposing Petition
R-OO-1B-C. XC Planning; filed.
il6. Charter Conmissioner Resumes received from: Richard J. BakEr; Lyle S.
Jlichardson; ',Iillter W. Orebaugll, JOiln S. lIamilton, Byron Koste, John P.
Turner, Ross Ohley, Charles E. Turner, Ronald C. Dillon.
il7. Letter dilted 7/17/80 from Cheryl D. Cro""",ell, Director, Dept. of Community
Affairs to Chairman Wenzel re assistilnce to establ ish Con~nunity Action
Agencies to assist low-income residents of Collier County. XC County
'~anager; filed.
48. Letter dated 7/16/80 from J. Darrett White suhmitting his resume for
appointment to the CAPC. XC [Jill Walters; filed.
49. Lettel' dated 7/2/80 from Vickie SChuyler, Inmokalee Service Programs, Inc.,
to /'1al'y Morgc;n re approval of funds to construct r'lul ti-Purpose Senior
Center on Golden Gate Park\~ay. XC County ~'anager; Fi led.
50. Copy of National Association of Counties Questionnilire dated 7/1/80
submi ttecl to and completed by County r~ilnager. XC County "lanager; fi led.
51. Lettel' d"ted 71l2/BO ft'o<ll Hill iam C. Hilmer, Sun Coast Distributors to
Chainn;:q Henzel plus brochure regarding lighted street and house numbers.
XC Plilllninu; filed.
52. Letter dated 7/17/80 from Dale Brown, William Ebbert Enterprises, to
Chil i IInan Wenze 1 re 1980 Sun Corn d i rec tory for sa 1 e. XC County '.tanager'
and Purchasing; filed.
53. Letter received from Donna E. Shala!a, IIUD National Conference on Local
Financial I~anagement. XC County Manag':r Norman and Harold Hall; filed.
54. Letter 61l8/BO from Bernard F. Hillenbrand, National Assn. of Counties
re promotion for the International Year of Disabled Persons; filed.
55. Copy of D.N.R. permit #CO-P2-80 iss' ~d 7/10/80 to Palmer Broadcasting
COmrl<lny. XC to Planlling; filed.
56. Letter dilted 7/15/80 from Daniel W. O'Connell, Florida Atlantic/
International University, to Chairman Wenzel re research project on
comprehensive planning. XC Planning, County "lanager; filed.
BOOK 05~ PAGE257
BOO~ 054 PAr.E2.58
July 29, 1980
57. Copy of memo dated 7/15/80 f)'om Everett H. Rothchild, fWD, re
wp~t.hpri7~t.i()n ~~si~t.ilnrp for low-income person~ interim rule. xc
Planning; filed.
58. Copy of letter oateo 7/14/80 from Rachel Louise Cline Kuhn to Chiliman
\'Jr~n7.el in ~Ihich she is seeking compensiltion in the amount of
$15tJ,000,OOO,OOO for problems she has encountered. XC t.o County
i.ianager and County Attorney; filed.
5'). Copy of letter from Jilne W. Robinson, CC'l~umer Services Director,
Floridil Dept. of Agricul ture " Consumer Services re customer complaint
about Cablevision, Palmer Broadcasting, xc to County Manager; also
copy of letter dilted 5/30/80 ilnd paid Cilb1evision invoice from said
customer, Mrs. Vincent Kelly to Florida State Attorney General, xc
to County Milnilger; fi led.
60. Copy of Jetter dated 7/18/80 from Doug r~cGoon, Jr. to Mayor Askren,
[verglildes City, re city wellfield for Everglades, xc Planning; also,
letter fl'om sallie individual dilted 7/25/80 to s~id Mayor re well field
gift to [verglade~ City, xc Planning; filed.
61. Copy of D.N.R. permit #A-78-P-285 issued 12/22/78 to Power Corporation,
xc to Plannin'J; fi led.
62. Copy of D.N.R. permit ItA CO-PS-8Ll dilted 7/16/80 issued to Park Shore,
xc to Planning; filed.
63. Copy of D.N.R. penllit #78-P-83M dilted fl/28/79 issued to Richilrd Kraska,
xc to Plilnnin'J; filed.
6'1. Copy of n.E.R. report on the 201 Facilities Amendment, dated 7/10/80,
xc to 11". IJerzon; filed.
65. Copy of Resolution 110. BO-R-130 issued hy Mal'ion COIJllty, Florida, Board
of County Commissioners re the proposals involved in changing the
::edicaio rl'ogl'am, xc County Manager and rks. Skinner, :;ocial Services;
f i 1 cd.
66. D.a.i. notice re status of four-laning SR-95l and public information
~:orkshop t.o IJe held 8/5/80 at (Jarfield Elementary Schonl, xc County
Engineer Barksdale; filed.
67. D.O.T. notice received 7/1tJ/80 re vegetiltion milnilgement at advertising
displays, xc County Engineer (Jarksdale; filed.
68. Public Service Con~l1ission Notice re Docket fl0055tJ-TP and 790697-RULE
regal'ding the rule amendment relating to deposits, filed.
69. D.E.R. Notice dilted 7/3/80 of meeting to hear revisions to the Fla.
Adm. Code re Wastewater Filcilities; xc to Mr. (Jerzon; filed.
70. Copy of 7/2/801;linutcs frolll flap 1 es City Council, fi 1 ed.
71. Copy of 7/1 O/RO Goldcn GJ te Estates Study COIl~nittee meeting, fil eo.
72. Copy of 7/16/110 lI1i nu tes of Historical Commission meetin9, filed.
73. Copy of Nap 1 cs Ci ty Counci 1 6/18/80 meeting, filed.
't.. ~\~.
1..1
July 29, 1980
71\. Copy of Naples Ci ty Council minutes of 6/4/80. filed.
75. Departmental Reports:
a. Building Department, monthly activity report, 6/80
b. Social Services. 5/80
c. Building Department, monthly report, 6/80
d. Building Department, dwelling units permitted, 6/80
MARCO SEWER EASEMENT FROM JULIO AND ANGELA GARCIA - FILED FOR THE RECORD
FOLLOW I NG RECORD:~r ION
Pursuant to action taken by the Board on April 3, 1979, wherein the Board
approved the acceptance and expenditure of funds for the recording of all Utility
Easements related to the Marco Sewer - Phase 1 project, Utilities Division
Director Bcrzon submittcd the following Easement, same having been recorded in
the Official Rccords;
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.,.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Boax 054 PAGE 259
l }
July 29, 1980
LAKE TRAFFORD MEMORIAL GARDENS CEMETERY DEEDS NOS. 228, 229 and 230 -
FlLED FOR TilE RECORD FOLLOWING RECORDATION
Pursuant to action of thc Board January 10, 1978, whercin the Chairman ~/as
authorized to sign various deeds to Lake Trafford r~emorial Gardens Cemetery lots
as the need arises, the following Deeds, Nos. 228, 229 and 230, were filed
for the ;~cord following recordation:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
~on~ 054 PAGE261
/
1
l
July 29, .:mu
WILLOUGHBY ACRES ~~ATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS UTILITY EASEMENT/QUIT-CLAIM DEED
RE LAWYERS' AIJSTRACT SERVICES, INC. - FILED FOR THE RECORD FOLLOWING RECORDATION
PurSllant to ilction taken by the IJoard on April 3, 1979, wherein the Board
approved the acceptance and expenditure of funds fur' tile r'(~<;ur'(JirJY of all ULil i ty
Easements related to the Willourhby Acres Sewer Project. Utilities Division
Director Irving Serzon submitted the following Easement, same having been recorded
in the Official Records;
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BO~~ 054- PAGE 265
-~:-- -----------
~,....- ",.~ "f1
(
July 29, 1980
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting
was adjourned by order of the Chair - Time: 5:00 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
~~~
ATTEST:
WILLWi .It
,
,
, J ~ I . .~ ...
M~~ Cl54 PAGEl67
--!!.'-.,.-;