Resolution 2005-235/DO 05-01
Be
RESOLUTION NO. 05- 235
DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 05-~
A DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR THE
TOWN OF AVE MARIA, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT LOCATED IN SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND
SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
29 EAST AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST,COLLlER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2004, Ave Maria Development, LLLP (herein "Developer"), by
and through its authorized agent, George L. Varnadoe, in accordance with Subsection
380.06(6), Florida Statutes (2002), filed an Application for Development Approval of a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as the Town of Ave Maria (herein Ave Maria) with
Collier County and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC); and
WHEREAS, the Developer has obtained all necessary approvals from Collier County
agencies, departments, and boards required as a condition of approval for a Stewardship
Receiving Area (SRA) and DRI approvals; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners as the governing body of the
unincorporated area of Collier County having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida
Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider the Application for Development Approval
(ADA) for the Town of Ave Maria DRI; and
WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes and the
Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), which includes the County's Zoning Ordinance
have been satisfied; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the
report and recommendations of the SWFRPC and held a public hearing to consider the ADA on
June 2, 2005; and
Page 1 of 29
WHEREAS, the issuance of a development order pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida
Statutes, does not constitute a waiver of any powers or rights regarding the issuance of other
development permits consistent herewith by the County or State; and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners, at an open public
hearing in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered the ADA for the
Be
Town of Ave Maria DRI submitted by Developer; the report and recommendations of the
SWFRPC, the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County
Planning Commission; the report and recommendations of the Collier County Planning
Commission; the recommendations of Collier County staff and advisory boards; and the record
made at said hearing, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The real property constituting the Town of Ave Maria DRI and which is the
subject of the ADA, consists of approximately 5,027 acres, and is legally described as set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
2. The application is consistent with Subsection 380.06(6), Florida Statutes.
3. The Developer submitted to the County an Application for Development Approval
("ADA") and sufficiency responses, hereby referred to as composite Exhibit "B", which by
reference thereto is made a part hereof to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the terms and
conditions of this development order approving the ADA.
4. The Developer proposes development of the Town of Ave Maria Development of
Regional Impact, as shown on the Master Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C", which
shall include the following:
A. 11,000 residential dwelling units,
B. 690,000 gross square feet of retail/service,
C. 510,000 square feet of office,
D. 400 hotel rooms,
Page 2 of 29
f Be
.
-
E. 6,000 student university with ancillary uses,
F. In addition to the DRI threshold uses described above, the Town may
include up to 450 units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and
miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, public and private schools,
churches and other places of worship, uses such as golf courses, lakes, open space, and
community support facilities, and those uses customarily associated with a university such as
student and administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support facilities.
5. The development is consistent with the report and recommendations of the
SWFRPC submitted pursuant to Subsection 380.06(12), Florida Statutes.
6. A comprehensive review of the regional and local impact generated by the
development has been conducted by the appropriate County departments and agencies and by
the SWFRPC.
7. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State Concern
pursuant 0 the provisions of Section 380.05, Florida Statutes, as amended.
8. The development is consistent with the current land development regulations and
the Growth Management Plan (GMP) of Collier County, as amended, adopted pursuant to
Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.
9. The Town of Ave Maria DRI is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
A. The applicant shall construct within the boundaries of the project affordable
housing units in the price ranges as defined in Collier County Comprehensive
Plan, as follows: a minimum of
Page 3 of 29
Be
',"'.
.
(i) 1,000 Moderate Income, owner-occupied housing units, that is for
households whose total gross income is greater than 80%, but does not
exceed 120% of the HUD median family income limit for Naples, Florida
MSA;
(ii) 700 Low Income housing units (50% to be owner-occupied), that is for
households whose total gross income is greater than 50%, but does not
exceed 80% of the HUD median family income limit for Naples, Florida
MSA; and
(iii) 200 Very Low Income housing units, that is for households whose total
gross income is less than 50% of the HUD median family income limit for
Naples, Florida MSA.
B. In addition to the above on-site affordable housing development requirements,
the applicant shall provide a 28-acre parcel of developable land to Habitat for
Humanity, who has advised that this parcel is suitable for the development of up
to 150 dwelling units of very low income housing.
C. The construction of affordable housing units shall be phased at least
proportionally with the non-residential development so as to be available as the
project builds out and jobs are created.
D. Very Low and Low Income rental units.
The 200 Very Low income rental units and any rental units constructed and
offered to meet the commitment for low income household for affordable housing
shall be maintained at rental rates that meet the requirements of Rule 9J-2.048,
Florida Administrative Code, for these income categories for the duration of the
Development Order (15 years).
E. Low Income owner-occupied housing.
Page 4 of 29
Be
. ;.
.
.
All units offered for sale in this category shall be subject to a deed restriction that
if the buyer sells the unit within five (5) years from the date of purchase, the sales
price shall be limited to the initial sales price plus a 5% per year increase, the
buyer's closing costs and verifiable cost of any improvements. There will be a
lien recorded in the official record of Collier County on the property in favor of
Collier County or the Collier County Housing Development Corporation for any
amounts in excess of the above. Those_entities agree and commit to enforce
said lien and to use the proceeds to maintain the affordability of such units.
F. Moderate Housing
All units in this category shall be initially offered at prices that meet the
requirements of Rule 9J-2.048, Florida Administrative Code for moderate income
housing at the time any such unit is offered for sale. All such units shall be
subject to one of the following;
(i) the unit will be subject to a restriction in the deed that limits the sales
price on said unit for a period of two (2) years to an amount equal to the
original purchase price plus buyer's closing costs, and the verifiable cost
of any improvements, plus an increase of 5% per year. Any profit in
excess of the above purchase price shall be payable to Collier County or
the Collier County Housing Development Corporation. Such deed
restriction shall run in favor of the County or the Collier County Housing
Development Corporation. Those entities agree to enforce this restriction
and to prioritize the utilization of any funds derived therefrom to assist
affordable housing buyers to purchase units in the Town of Ave Maria; or
(i1) a buy-back provision included in the deed which shall provide that for a
period of two years, the Seller shall repurchase the unit if offered for sale
by the initial buyer at a price that would not qualify under Rule 9J-2.048,
Page 5 of 29
rac
FAC, as moderate income housing. Said_buy-back provision shall be at
an amount that equals the original purchase price, buyers closing costs
and any buyer improvements, plus a 5% per year increase in the original
purchase price. After any such repurchase, Seller agrees to place the
unit on the market at the repurchase amount, plus its reasonably
expected costs of resale.
2. ENERGY
A. Any DRI Development Order issued by Collier County shall contain a provision
that the applicant's commitments for energy conservation are adopted where
appropriate for this project.
3. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
A. The Camp Keais flowway has been recommended for enhancement due to
exotic vegetation. The applicant's recommended enhancements shall be
addressed to ensure adequate outfall from the proposed project.
B. Detailed design plans, calculations (including appropriate flood routings), and
supporting documentation that resolve these issues must be submitted at the
time of application for an ERP.
C. Special BMPs shall be required for both the construction phase of the project and
long-term operation of the surface water management system. The required
water quality treatment will meet the permitting requirements of SFWMD and
EPA.
D. The project requires a modification to Environmental Resource Permit No. 11-
02336-P for conceptual approval of the DRI project site, for construction and
operation of the surface water management system for the remaining phases of
the proposed development, and for the proposed impacts to wetlands and other
surface waters.
Page 6 of 29
r' 8 C
..
E. The project requires a Water Use Permit for certain dewatering activities
proposed for the construction of project lakes, utilities, and/or road or building
foundations for the remaining phases of the proposed development.
F. All internal stormwater management lakes and ditches, and anyon-site
preserved/enhanced wetland areas, shall be set aside as recorded private
drainage and/or conservation easements. Stormwater lakes shall include, where
practical, adequate maintenance easements around the lakes, with access to a
paved roadway.
G. During construction activities, the applicant shall employ Best Management
Practices for erosion and sedimentation control. These practices shall be
included with, or presented on, all construction plans, and shall be subject to
approval by the appropriate agencies prior to their implementation.
H. Any construction period silt barriers or hay bales, and any anchor soil, as well as
accumulated silt, shall be removed upon completion of construction. Either the
applicant or the entities responsible for the specific construction activities
requiring these measures shall assume responsibility for having them removed
upon completion of construction.
I. The final stormwater management plan shall consider, as applicable, measures
to reduce runoff rates and volumes, including, but not limited to, fixed control
structures, perforated pipes, and grass swale conveyances.
J. Any shoreline banks created along the on-site stormwater management system
shall include littoral zones constructed on slopes consistent with SFWMD and
Collier County requirements and shall be planted in native emergent or
submergent aquatic vegetation. The applicant shall ensure, by supplemental
replanting as necessary, that at least 80% cover by native aquatic vegetation is
established within the littoral zone for the duration of the project.
Page 7 of 29
w" BC
r
K. The applicant shall conduct annual inspections in accordance with the conditions
of the approved SFWMD ERP, of the Town of Ave Maria Master Stormwater
Management System and any preserved/enhanced wetland areas on the project
site so as to ensure that these areas are maintained in keeping with the final
approved designs, and that the water management system is capable of
accomplishing the level of stormwater storage and treatment for which it was
intended.
L. The applicant shall confirm, to the satisfaction of all applicable federal, state,
local review agencies, and the South Florida Water Management District, that the
proposed stormwater management system will not impact habitats of any state or
federally listed plant and/or animal species potentially occurring on site or that
such impacts shall be mitigated to the benefit of regional or RLSA-wide
populations of those species.
M. The applicant, its successors or assigns, shall undertake a regularly scheduled
vacuum sweeping of all common streets and parking areas within the
development. The applicant shall encourage any private parcel owners within
the development to institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of their
respective streets and/or parking areas.
N. Design considerations will be given to ditch and swale slopes, where practical, in
an effort to minimize discharges so that these facilities may provide some
additional water quality treatment prior to discharge. Treatment swales shall be
planted with grass or other vegetation as reviewed and approved during the ERP
approval process.
O. The grassed stormwater treatment areas shall be mowed on a regular basis as
part of the normal lawn maintenance of the development. Any debris that may
accumulate in project lakes, ditches or swales, or which may interfere with the
Page 8 of 29
- -_._._._,._--...._-~--'"_.....-
8e'~~
normal flow of water through discharge structures and under drain systems, shall
be cleaned from the detention/retention areas on a regular basis. Any erosion to
banks shall be replaced immediately.
P. Under drain systems and grease baffles, if utilized within the Town of Ave Maria
DRI, shall be inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a regular basis. In no
instance shall the period between such inspections exceed eighteen months.
Q. Stormwater Management System maintenance requirements within the Town of
Ave Maria shall include removal of any mosquito-productive nuisance plant
species from all system nodes, reaches, and percolation basins, as well as from
the lake littoral zones employed in the system.
R. To the extent consistent with applicable stormwater management system and
environmental regulations, any isolated wading bird "pools" constructed in lake
littoral zones shall be excavated to a depth which provides aquatic habitat for
mosquito larvae predators, such as Gambusia affinis.
S. Best Management Practices will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse impacts
upon surface water and shallow groundwater at and adjacent to the site in
accordance with the Ave Maria stormwater management BMP's approved by
SFWMD.
T. The surface water management system will be designed to limit the discharge
from the developed system to the offsite areas per Collier County Ordinances in
effect at the time of permitting.
U. The applicant proposes to enhance/restore portions or the large contiguous
wetland systems just outside the western property boundary. The hydroperiods
of these systems are relatively robust and are ultimately controlled by the
regional hydrology of the Camp Keais Strand, and thus more or less dependent
upon natural hydrologic factors.
Page 9 of 29
Be
'\;>1\,'1'''' 4
..
V. The proposed development will occur in agricultural areas that are outside of the
100 Year-3 Day floodplain and will not result in the removal of storage volume
from the 100 year floodplain.
W. The littoral planting species selection and the elevation strata will be reviewed by
Collier County as a part of the Lake Excavation Permit submittal and the
survivability of the plantings will be insured through bonds provided to Collier
County until the county defined success criteria for the survivability of the littoral
plantings is accomplished.
X. The stormwater management system will be maintained by the Ave Maria
Stewardship Community District (herein AMSCD) and/or master homeowners'
associations. AMSCD will maintain the backbone and common area stormwater
management facilities.
Y. All commitments made by the applicant within the ADA, and subsequent
sufficiency round information, related to Question 10 (General Project
Description) and Question 19 (Stormwater Management), and not in conflict with
the above recommendations, shall be incorporated in the Collier County
Development Order as conditions for approval.
4. TRANSPORTATION
A. The applicant or his successor or assigns, shall be fully responsible for site-
related roadway and intersection improvements required within the Town of Ave
Maria DRI, including project access points on Oil Well Road (CR 858) and Camp
Keais Road as well as secondary access connections to camp Keais Road.
B. The Application for Development Approval Transportation Analysis (Question 21)
indicates that the Town of Ave Maria will significantly impact the following
regional roadways that may operate below adopted level of service standards at
some time during buildout of the project.
Page 10 of 29
Be-!
ROADWAY LIMITS IMPROVEMENT
Collier Golden Gate Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 40 to 60
Blvd.
1-75 Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. 4F to 6F
Immokalee Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 2t04D
Road
Immokalee Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd. 2 t04D
Road
Immokalee Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 2 t04D
Road
Main St. CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 40 to 60
J8R 29)
N. 15th St. Main St. to Immokalee Dr. 2t04D
~R29)
N. 15th St. Immokalee Dr. to Lake Trafford Rd. 2 t04D
J8R 29)
N. 15th St. Lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 2 t04D
JSR 29)
N. 15th St. 29A North to SR 82 2 to 40
(SR29)
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 2 t04D
SR 29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 2 t04D
SR 82 (5) SR 29 to Hendry County Line 2t04D
C. The Application for Development Approval Transportation Analysis (Question 21)
indicates that the Town of Ave Maria will significantly impact the following regional
intersections that may operate below adopted level of service standards at some
time during buildout of the project.
Page 11 of 29
8 C '"
PROGRAMMED ESTIMATED
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ADDITIONAL
IMPROVEMENT
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75
SB On/Off Ram~ None Change One EBL into an
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 EBT
NB On/Off Ramp
Immokalee Rd. at +1EBT + 1WBT + 1EBL + 1WBL
Oakes Blvd.
Immokalee Rd. at +2EBT +2WBT +WBR + 1 NBR + re-stripe NBL to
Wilson Blvd. L/Thru
Immokalee Rd. at None Signalize + 1 NBT + 1 SBT
Camp Keais Rd. + 1SBL
Immokalee Rd. (1st.
St.) at SR 29 (Main None + 1EBL + 1WBL
St.)
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) None + 1NBT + 1SBT + 1WBR
at Lake Trafford Rd.
Oil Well Rd. at None Signalize
Everglades Blvd.
Oil Well Rd. at Ave None Signalize + 1 EBL
Maria Entrance
Oil Well Rd. at Camp None Signalize
Keais Rd.
Oil Well Rd. at SR 29 None Signalize + 1 NBL + 1 NBT
+1SBL+1SBT+1EBL
Camp Keais Rd. at None Signalize + 1 NBL
Ave Maria Entrance
Collier Blvd. at Pine None + EBT + 1NBL + 1NBT +
Ridge Rd. 1SBT
D. The Developer shall provide its proportionate share of the costs of necessary
roadway and intersection improvements in Paragraph 4.B. and 4.C. including, but
not limited to, right-of-way, costs of signalization, turn lanes, and other
improvements deemed necessary by Collier County to maintain the adopted level
of service, through the payment of legally adopted road impact fees.
Improvements to the facilities outlined in Paragraph 4.B. and 4.C, above will be
necessary at the time that a road segment or intersection is expected to operate
below the level of service standard (LOS) adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP), or shall be programmed for construction within three
Page 12 of 29
Be
.
..
years of that time. If the road segment or intersection is not operating at the
County's adopted LOS standard and the Town of Ave Maria is contributing five
percent (5%) or more of the P.M. peak hour directional service volume at that
LOS standard, then except as otherwise provided for in paragraph E. below, no
additional building permits shall be issued unless the improvements are: a)
complete, b) under construction, c) the subject of a clearly identified, executed
and recorded local government development agreement consistent with Sec.
163.3220 through 163.3423, F.S, incorporated into the D.O. ensuring completion
concurrent with impacts; d) the sUbject of a binding commitment from Collier
County ensuring completion concurrent with impacts incorporated into the D.O.;
e) the subject of a binding commitment by the County in the current three years
of the Schedule of Capital Improvements of the Capital Improvement Element
(CIE); or f) the subject of a binding and enforceable commitment by the
developer or his successor or assigns, to provide the improvement concurrent
with impacts. Any combination of the above, which ensures that the
improvement is also acceptable, provided the SWFRPC, Collier County, and
DCA agree that the combination meets the intent of the transportation uniform
standards rule.
E. In order to make adequate provision for the mitigation of the project's impacts on
the transportation facilities, the alternative innovative mitigation strategy
identified herein is based upon the applicable standards and proportionate share
criteria set forth in 9J-2.045, FAC. and is intended to comply with the intent and
purpose of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. In developing this pUblic-private
mitigation strategy, consideration has been given to the project's overall
potential to enhance educational opportunities, to promote economic
development in the region, to further other local and state planning goals dealing
Page 13 of 29
k
Be
.
with rural land stewardship concepts, to the use of innovative solutions that
provide equal or better protection, and to the appropriate use of essential
transportation planning and programming solutions that further the capital
improvement process. As an alternative to the requirement of Paragraph D.
above, the developer, or its successor or assigns, will pay a proportionate share
contribution, calculated consistent with the formula in Paragraph 9J-2.045(1)(h),
FAC., to Collier County for the improvement(s). Collier County and Developer
entered into a Developer Contribution Agreement on April 26, 2005, a copy of
which is attached as Exhibit "0", that provides for the payment of Developer's
proportionate share. A portion of the proportionate share payment shall be
applied to the construction of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to Camp
Keais Road, after which the remaining proportionate share shall be applied only
to improvements to one or more of the significantly impacted roadways or
intersections. Collier County has deemed the multi-Ianing of Oil Well Road and
commitments to assist with improvements to the other road segments specified
in the Developer Contribution Agreement to be a reasonable alternative which, if
constructed, will reduce traffic volumes on one or more of the listed segments.
A portion of, or all of, the applicant's, or its successor's or assigns, proportionate
share contribution is being provided through the Developer's, or its successor's
or assignee's, payment of Collier County road impact fees, through the donation,
without credit for road impact fees of the following: (1) road right-of-way (valued
at $7,800,000), (2) stormwater management right-of-way (valued at $1,950,000),
and (3) fill material at cost savings (valued at $11,000,000), for future
improvements to Oil Well Road, portions of Immokalee Road and Camp Keais
Road, and through any other contributions included in the Developer
Contribution Agreement, including, but not limited to, the advanced payment of
Page 14 of 29
Be
"'~i ,.>.f!\ii'
road impact fees and design/engineering services and permitting services fees
(estimated to be $6,000,000). No additional building permits shall be issued
unless the County receives proportionate share payment and there is a
commitment to use the contribution for the construction of a needed
transportation improvements. Any delay in payment or change of the
proportionate share payment shall require a reanalysis of the payment amount in
a Notice of Proposed Change.
F. In order to ensure a continuous payment stream of the proportionate share
contributions anticipated by the Developer Contribution Agreement, and in
recognition of the commitments in the Developer Contribution Agreement, and in
a manner that ensures consistency with the Growth Management Plan's
Concurrency Management System, Collier County has committed to reserve to
the AMSCD sufficient roadway capacity within the Concurrency Management
System for use by the project pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement (Exhibit "E")
executed on April 26, 2005.
G. To determine the project impact on regional facilities, a biennial monitoring report
shall be submitted to Collier County, Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and SWFRPC for review and
approval. At a minimum, except as provided for in 4.H., below, the report shall
provide the following:
1. A summary of construction and development activities to date, in
the categories of development as recorded in the development
order;
2. An estimate of the p.m. peak hour trip generation and turning
movements at each of the project's access points;
3. An estimate of p.m. peak hour trips assigned to each road
Page 15 of 29
8C'~1
4.
segment identified in Paragraph 4.B.;
An estimate of p.m. peak hour trips at the off-site intersections
listed in paragraph 4.C.;
A calculation of the existing peak hour level of service for the
facilities listed in paragraphs 4.B. and 4.C. above.
An estimate of the level of development expected to be added by
the project for the forthcoming two years;
The status of the road improvements committed to in the
development order, addressing any deviations from the schedule
for making such improvements;
The amount of total external traffic and the proportion of traffic that
is retained internally to the site and that which is accessing the
external road network;
The status of "walkable community" planning principles related to
efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within the development,
including numerical indicators against which goals can be
measured, such as: number of motorized vehicles in the outside
lane, vehicle speed, lane conditions, existence of sidewalks, etc.;
A status report on achieving inter-modal links and access to transit
and the use of transit throughout major corridors, including
numerical indicators against which goals can be measured, such
as: modal split, annual transit trips per capita, buses per hour, or
auto occupancy rate; and
A report that assesses the extent that development protects
and/or threatens biodiversity and wildlife in the County and
Region, including numerical indicators against which goals can be
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Page 16 of 29
Be
measured, such as: number of wildlife crossings included in road
widening plans, number of acres of land set aside for preservation
and protection of wildlife, number of species found in the area, use
of habitat maps to predict the number of panthers in the area, use
of habitat maps to predict travel patterns of panthers in the area,
use of GIS maps to identify ecological hotspots.
H. As an alternative to collecting peak hour traffic data and analyzing the LOS for
roadway segments and intersections identified in Paragraphs 4.B. and 4.C.
required by Paragraph 4.G. above, the developer and Collier County may
consider an appropriate contribution for the construction of permanent traffic
counting stations that would be turned over to Collier County for operation and
maintenance. These stations would become part of an integrated network of
count locations that would provide continuous monitoring capabilities. Data
collected by these stations and other stations within the area of influence would
be made available to the developer in the preparation of the biennial monitoring
reports. In the event such data reveals a potential deficiency, any further data
collection and analysis would be the responsibility of the developer.
I. The applicant shall install permanent traffic count stations on all project entrance
roads. The equipment will be owned and maintained by the applicant or his
successor or assigns.
J. The applicant shall promote efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within and
between the development's components, and to adjacent properties as deemed
necessary by Collier County by providing for the facilities required by the Land
Development Code or as may be required by the Comprehensive Pathway Plan
that make appropriate linkages to the DRI internal pathways network. Also, the
applicant may consider future connection to the proposed FPL Trail, which could
Page 17 of 29
r trt~r
enter the Town of Ave Maria from the north in the vicinity of the proposed
park/school or northeast via Camp Keais Road.
K. The applicant shall promote transit service through the inclusion of bus stops or
other appropriate transit access points in site design, consistent with Collier
County transit plans. The location of bus stops and transit access points shall be
planned and integrated with the Town's bicycle and pedestrian plan.
L. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners may consider options to the
conditions of this Development Order to the extent that the options provide
adequate commitments for improvements indicated above to significantly
impacted regional roadways and intersections. Whatever options are exercised,
may be done without amending this Development Order, however, shall be done
with the understanding that the following conditions shall be met:
1. The transportation impacts to the roads and intersections above shall be
appropriately addressed consistent with SWFRPC policies, and the
determination of impact fees and/or a proportionate share.
2. No development will be permitted beyond that approved for termination of the
Development Order (Year 2020) or based on a land use conversion that
exceeds substantial deviation thresholds until such time as a Notice of
Proposed Change/Substantial Deviation application including a cumulative
transportation analysis has been reviewed and approved in accordance with
Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes.
Page 18 of 29
-'. _"'_"'---..__.,--,.,---,~,_._-,
~
.,..;1
5. VEGETATION AND WILDLlFEIWETLANDS
A. Habitat protection for listed plants and wildlife species and additional off site
wetland mitigation will occur on approximately 17,000 acres of land, as part of
the Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) development entitlement process.
The Stewardship easements to the 17,000 acres of Stewardship Sending Areas
will run in favor of Collier County and Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Affairs. The Stewardship Easements not already recorded will be
executed and recorded in the Official Records of Collier County within thirty (30)
days of approval of the Stewardship Sending Area.
B. A management plan for the crested caracara shall be submitted for review,
comments, and approval by the FWC and USFWS prior to commencement of
project construction beyond that approved in the Preliminary Development
Agreement.
C. A pre-construction survey for Florida burrowing owls shall be conducted in
accordance with FWC protocols. If nests are found, then the FWC shall be
contacted for review and consultation concerning conservation measures, and, if
needed, mitigation prior to project construction in the area of such nests.
D. If required by USFWS, an indigo snake protection plan shall be developed,
reviewed, and approved by USFWS prior to commencement of construction.
E. The Developer shall preserve and restore 62 acres of wetlands as freshwater
marshes that will be integrated into the surface water management system in two
locations as shown on the Master Development Plan (Map "H").
F. Mitigation (wetland/habitat enhancement) for impacts to on-site wetlands where
listed species plants are found is planned to occur within the large systems just
outside (west) of the property, and Developer will maintain suitable environments
for these plants to thrive.
Page 19 of 29
rac
G. The set asides for panther will be established somewhere within the SSAs, and
the exact locations, habitat type(s), and extent of the set asides will be
determined via Section 7 consultations with USFWS, and the concurrence of
FWC.
H. All commitments made by the applicant within the ADA, and subsequent
sufficiency round information, related to Question 12 (Vegetation and Wildlife)
and Question 13 (Wetlands), and not in conflict with the above
recommendations, shall be incorporated in the Collier County Development
Order as conditions for approval.
6. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENTIWATER SUPPLY
A. The project shall utilize ultra-low volume water plumbing fixtures, self-closing
and/or metered water faucets, xeriscape landscape techniques, and other water
conserving devices and/or methods. These devices and methods shall meet the
criteria outlined in the water conservation plans of the public water supply permit
issued to the Ave Maria Utility Company by the South Florida Water Management
District.
B. At the time of application for the District Permit Modification, the applicant should
provide verification that the proposed plumbing and irrigation system designs
meet District criteria in effect at that time.
C. All construction plans, technical specifications, and proposed plats, as applicable,
for the proposed water distribution and wastewater collection systems, and any
possible on-site treatment facilities, should be reviewed and approved by Ave
Maria Utility Company, LLLP prior to commencement of construction.
D. All potable water facilities, including any possible on-site potable water treatment
plants, should be properly sized to supply average and peak day domestic
Page 20 of 29
ae ",,_e
..,)i' _
demand, in addition to fire flow demand, at a rate approved by the Immokalee Fire
Department.
E. The lowest quality of water available and acceptable should be utilized for all non-
potable water uses.
F. The irrigation system will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of
irrigation water during times when it is not needed.
G. Abandoned agricultural wells located on the project site will be properly plugged
by a licensed drilling contractor.
H. Water saving plumbing devices will be used as required by the current building
code.
I. Irrigation of golf course areas will be performed by deep, infrequent waterings in
order to encourage rooting of turf grass to provide more efficient utilization of
water and nutrients. Irrigation will occur per SFWMD consumptive use permit.
J. Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP, will provide water, wastewater, and
reclaimed water to the town of Ave Maria.
K. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse
impacts upon surface water and shallow groundwater at and adjacent to the site,
in accordance with the Ave Maria stormwater management BMP's approved by
SFWMD.
L. All commitments made by the applicant, within the ADA and subsequent
sufficiency round information, related to Question 10 (General Project
Description), Question 14 (Water), Question 17 (Water Supply), and Question 18
(Wastewater Management), and not in conflict with the above recommendations
should be incorporated as conditions of approval within the Collier County
Development Order for the Town of Ave Maria.
Page 21 of 29
!\!F'SC
"
7. HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES
A. The research used for the ADA will be utilized to develop text for a historical
marker commemorating Second Seminole War activities, which will be placed at
an appropriate location within Ave Maria.
8. EDUCATION
A. The applicant shall dedicate a site of at least 46 acres within Ave Maria to the
School District for an elementary and middle school. The site will have direct
access to the "loop" road and will provide convenient access, both vehicular and
pedestrian, from the surrounding neighborhoods.
B. The applicant shall dedicate a high school site of approximately 60 acres in a
location requested by School Board staff that is approximately two miles west of
Camp Keais Road north of Immokalee Road.
C. All commitments made by the applicant within the ADA and subsequent
sufficiency round information related to Question 10 (General Project
Description) and Question 27 (Education), and not in conflict with the above
recommendations should be incorporated as conditions of approval within the
Collier County Development Order for the Town of Ave Maria.
9. POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
A. Any buildings where hazardous material/waste is to be used, displayed, handled,
generated or stored will be constructed with impervious floors with adequate floor
drains leading to separate impervious holding facilities that are adequate to
contain and safely facilitate cleanups of any spills, or contaminated substances.
B. Facilities qualifying under the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act
(SARA) Title III of 1986, and the Florida Hazardous Materials Emergency
Response and Community Right to Know Act of 1988, shall file hazardous
Page 22 of 29
._._--'--~<._,~_..._-
Be '"
, ",
,
"If"-
materials reporting applications in accordance with sections 302, 303, 311, 312,
or 313. Applications shall be updated annually by each reporting facility.
C. Developer shall assist in the development, building, and funding of a Multi-
purpose Public Safety Center to house emergency response personnel and
equipment to ensure that the development does not dilute the existing
emergency services in Immokalee and surrounding communities.
D. The fire flows required for Ave Maria will be provided through the potable water
distribution system. Adequate system storage and pumping capacity at the water
plant site will be installed to provide the required flows. Distribution system pipes
will be sized to deliver the fire flows to the buildings to meet the requirements of
the National Fire Protection Association.
E. The on-campus security provider will utilize foot patrols at the University. It is not
anticipated that the on-campus security personnel will provide security service for
the town. The Collier County Sheriff's Department will provide police protection
for the town. A permanent Sheriff's substation is planned within the community
facilities district of the project.
F. As the development of the project progresses, the applicant will continue to
coordinate with the Sheriff's Department regarding security measures and
features that will likely deter criminal activity at the University and the Town.
G. The applicant has committed to provide a temporary public safety facility and a
minimum of three acres of property for a permanent joint facility which will meet
the needs of the Immokalee Fire District, Collier Emergency Medical Services,
and the Collier Sheriff's Department as the Town grows. In addition to the
commitment to dedicate a minimum of three acres for a joint facility to house
EMS/Fire Station/Sheriff sub-station, Applicant agrees to reserve an additional
one acre site within the Town for "Government Building(s)" adjacent to the joint
Page 23 of 29
.."._'_.~--_._-"~,~-----_..__._-,--."~._,- ----~
8 C... ...' I
',. ,'l"""
..
facility. This site shall be reserved by Applicant until development of whichever is
the latter in time: 75% of the total number of residential dwelling units or 75% of
total area of non-residential uses; as measured at time of building permit
approvals. If such a commitment is not exercised by timely notice from the
County to the Applicant as stated immediately above, then this one acre site
reservation shall terminate. The one acre site shall be dedicated to the County in
exchange for impact fee credits upon the County committing to construct a
"Government Building(s)" facility by identifying same within the County's CIP.
10. SOLID/HAZARDOUS/MEDICAL WASTE
A. The project shall be bound by all applicable recycling requirements in effect in
the County at the time of the development.
B. Any buildings where hazardous materials or waste is to be used, displayed,
handled, generated or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors with
adequate floor drains leading to separate impervious holding facilities that are
adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanups of any spill, leakage, or
contaminated water.
C. Discharge of hazardous waste effluent into the sewage system shall be
prohibited unless approved by permit issued by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.
D. Any business found within the development boundary that generates hazardous
waste will be responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of
the hazardous waste generated by such business. However, there will be no
siting of hazardous waste storage facilities contrary to the county zoning
regulations,
Page 24 of 29
Be
E. Any off-site disposal of hazardous waste would be the responsibility of the
business that has generated the hazardous waste. All local and state regulations
will be followed in the proper off-site disposal of hazardous waste.
F. Any business found within the development that generates hazardous waste
shall be responsible for following all local and state regulations pertaining to the
generation and handling of hazardous waste at the development.
G. Should natural gas be utilized at some future date, applicable state and local
regulations will be met.
H. The number of restaurants is not known at this time. Restaurant owners will be
required to comply with the County's grease trap ordinance that requires routine
maintenance of the grease removal system.
I. The responsibility for disposing medical and hazardous waste lies with the waste
generator in accordance with Florida law (64E-16, FAC. for Biohazardous
Waste; 62-730 FAC. for hazardous waste). These generators will be
responsible for contracting with properly licensed waste haulers for disposal of
these "special wastes".
11. CONSISTENCY WITH THE LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Collier County has determined that the Town of Ave Maria DRI project is consistent with
the Collier County GMP and that the project's development, as approved in this
development order, is consistent with the County's Concurrency Management System
relative to public facilities necessary to support the development.
12. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. All commitments and impact mitigating actions provided by the applicant within
the Application for Development Approval (and supplementary documents) that
are not in conflict with specific conditions for project approval outlined above are
officially adopted as conditions for approval.
Page 25 of 29
Be
..
B. The developer, or his successor(s) in title to the undeveloped portion of the
property, must submit a biennial report to the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and the State
Land Planning Agency, and all affected permit agencies on Form RPM-BSP-
Annual Report - 1. This report must describe the state of development and
compliance as of the date of submission and be consistent with the rules of the
State Land Planning Agency. The first monitoring report must be submitted to
the DRI Coordinator for SWFRPC, the State Land Planning Agency, and Collier
County no later than one year after the effective date of this Development Order.
Further reporting must be submitted not later than once every two years for
subsequent calendar years thereafter, until bUildout, whether actual or declared.
Failure to comply with this biennial reporting procedure is governed by
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, which provides for the temporary
suspension of the DRI Development Order. The developer must inform
successors in title to any undeveloped portion of the real property covered by this
Development Order.
C. The development phasing schedule presented within the ADA and as adjusted to
date of development order approval shall be incorporated as a condition of
approval. If development order conditions and applicant commitments
incorporated within the development order, ADA or sufficiency round responses
to mitigate regional impacts are not carried out as indicated to the extent or in
accord with the timing schedules specified within the development order and this
phasing schedule, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for
the affected regional issue.
D. If the local governments, during the course of monitoring the development, can
demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of
Page 26 of 29
pSC
the development order has occurred or that the development order was based on
substantially inaccurate information provided by the developer, resulting in
additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be
deemed to have occurred. The monitoring checklist contained in Appendix IV
shall be used as a guide by the local government in determining addition
substantial regional impacts.
E. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06(16), the applicant may be subject to credit for
contributions, construction, expansion, or acquisition of public facilities, if the
developer is also subject by local ordinances to impact fees or exactions to meet
the same needs. The local government and the developer may enter into a
capital contribution front-ending agreement to reimburse the developer for
voluntary contributions in excess of the fair share.
F. The local development order shall state the land uses approved in gross square
feet, acreages and parking (if applicable) consistent with the statewide guidelines
and standards in Chapter 380.0651 Florida Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, that:
1. The County's Community Development and Environmental Administrator shall be
the local official responsible for assuring compliance with the development order.
2. Physical development shall commence on or before January 1, 2006. The
project is being built in two phases of five years each, commencing with the effective date of this
Development Order. Buildout is projected to occur on or about December 31, 2016.
3. The definitions contained in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, shall control the
interpretation and construction of any terms of this development order.
4. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(15)(c)3, Florida Statutes, this project is exempt
from downzoning or intensity or density reduction until June 30, 2020, subject to the conditions
Page 27 of 29
8e
e
-
and limitations set forth in said Subsection of the Florida Statutes. The expiration date for this
Development Order is June 30, 2020.
5. Subsequent requests for development permits shall not require further review
pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, unless it is found by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, after due notice and hearing, that one or more of the following
items listed in Paragraphs A and B is present. Upon such a finding, the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County may take any action authorized by Subsection 380.06(19),
Florida Statutes, pending issuance of an amended development order.
A. A substantial deviation from the terms or conditions of this development
order, a substantial deviation to the project development phasing schedule, a failure to carry out
conditions, commitments or mitigation measures to the extent set forth herein or consistent with
the timing schedules specified herein or in the phasing schedule in the ADA, or substantial
deviation from the approved development plans which create a reasonable likelihood of
additional regional impacts or other types of regional impacts which were not previously
reviewed by the SWFRPC; or
B. An expiration of the period of effectiveness of this development order as
provided herein.
6. The approval granted by this development order is limited. Such approval shall
not be construed to relieve the Developer of the duty to comply with all other applicable local,
state or federal permitting regulations.
7. It is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall be
construed to mean any future entity which may be created or be designated or succeed in
interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of, any referenced
governmental agency in existence on the effective date of this development order.
8. Appropriate conditions and commitments contained herein may be assigned to or
assumed by a Special District formed pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes.
Page 28 of 29
8e
""'.- .
.
.--
9. In the event that any portion or section of this development order is determined to
be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall in no manner, affect the remaining portions of this development order which shall
remain in full force and effect.
10. This development order shall be binding upon the County and the Developer, its
assignees or successors in interest.
11. This development order shall become effective as provided by law.
12. Certified copies of this development order shall be provided by the County to
DCA and the SWFRPC as provided in Subsection 380.06(25)(g), Florida Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be recorded in the Minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote.
Done this 14th day of June, 2005.
ATTEST: ,D~~i~[;~~0J::K, CLERK
'- :..~::', .-j'/..',;" ' :.....~\~('.\
- .,' - ~ I " _ _) < ':
-RJ ;~!~d)~q.~~({~l;, Vc
( , c.',.' (DePBfy C. ~k
Attest Is'tO',Cllalnran.:~., ,.'
s f~~~~~~:d~~:t;f81ffii~~~'~"
'1"!I'"
legal sufficiency:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
//'u~ W_
\~" ~ /
~ J - \.J \" '
~ rt,4~' \ .\\.\J~
Patrick G. its
Assistant County Attorney
Item #
8'c
Agenda
Date
" -flf-oS
Page 29 of 29
~:~d b 'Z.1-05
flt'aJ.ht b k.
WilstinMillet'
.
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineen'ng
8e
<......,.
.
-
EXHIBIT "A" - D,R.I, LANDS
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP
47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH,
RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16:
THENCE NORTH 01"04'10" WEST 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OIL WELL
ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN
DESCRIBED;
THENCE SOUTH 88"57'06" WEST 152.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01"07'23" WEST 300.01 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 300 FEET NORTH OF
AN PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID OIL WELL ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88"57'05" WEST 2,417.56 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88"55'37" WEST 1,128.15 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 01"13'46" WEST 1,089.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"32'56" WEST 1,514,02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"24'19" WEST 3977.40 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 00"01'40. EAST 1280.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" EAST 1125.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"19'38" WEST 520.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09"27'58" EAST 38.31 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 14"56'15" EAST 32.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"02'49" EAST 24.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68"12'25" EAST 33.93 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 73"08'54" EAST 72.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"14'09" EAST 65.14 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 61"11'58" EAST 47.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56"44'10" EAST 80.38 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 54"18'17" EAST 82.75 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 51"34'19" EAST 552.31 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 12"32'03" EAST 52.12 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 16"41'34" WEST 780.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38"40'18" WEST 48.27 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 55"58'45" WEST 175.13 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 78"14'12" WEST 46.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86"41'17" WEST 358.77 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 43"16'35" WEST 44.00 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 01 "28'53" WEST 584.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88"45'30" EAST 2,256.99 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 11 "31 '40" WEST 679.82 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 29"57'19" EAST 43.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80"03'11" EAST 750.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82"05'14" EAST 23.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"45'48" WEST 831.15 FEET;
THENCE 82.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 128.55 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36"53'11" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 23"30'23" EAST 81.34 FEET TO A POINT
OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE 149.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE WEST, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 215.80 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39"48'43" SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS NORTH 22"02'37" EAST 146.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02"08'16" EAST 434.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38'40'13" EAST 124.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23"55'58" EAST 503.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89"19'06" EAST 272.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"10'42" EAST 718.98 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 09'56'39" EAST 638.73 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 73"36'58" EAST 172.46 FEET;
Office. .Iraleglcally localed 10 serve our cllenl. 800.649.4336
Naple./Corporale Office 3200 Bailey Lane. Sulle 200' Naples. Florida 34105' 239.649.4040 . Fax 239.643.5716
w/lsonmlller.com
WlIsonMiller,lnc - fL Lie,' LC-C000170
WilstinMiller
y
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
8e
Ii
--
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.1. LAN OS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 10"53'22" EAST 171.73 FEET;
THENCE 327.51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 68"07'37" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 39"53'35" WEST 308.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"57'24" WEST 492.85 FEET;
THENCE 313.21 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 331.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54"05'52" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 90"00'00" WEST 301.71 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62"57'04" WEST 506.32 FEET;
THENCE 155.39 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 107.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83"01'31" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27"09'30" WEST 142.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14"21'16" EAST 287.88 FEET;
THENCE 341.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 168.89 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 115"44'01"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29"11'23" WEST 286.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"03'24" WEST 81.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 19"06'00" WEST 178.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"34'35" WEST 263.81 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 33"42'00" WEST 81.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51"52'05" WEST 1,402.28 FEET;
THENCE 219.21 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 151.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82"54'07" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 22"50'28" WEST 200.58 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 18"36'35" EAST 1,047.10 FEET;
THENCE 196.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66"04'00" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 48"32'34" EAST 186.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81"34'34" EAST 177.10 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 14"02'28" EAST 106.97 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 15"53'24" WEST 33.42 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 72"18'08" WEST 1325.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"22'40" WEST 868.64 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"02'21" WEST 1,001.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15"43'23" WEST 808.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"29'42" WEST 215.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02"51'21" WEST 51.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37"59'19" EAST 51.77 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 58"24'39" EAST 660.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56"56'25" EAST 865.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 62"27'21" EAST 303.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"11'43" EAST 148.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"27'20" EAST 99.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79"59'44" EAST 60.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18"39'40" EAST 212.96 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 13"26'09" EAST 80.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04"05'14" EAST 65.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"47'28" EAST 593.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05"29'40" EAST 61.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20"17'22" EAST 57.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 51"55'17" EAST 55.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84"48'27" EAST 51.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 67"53'53" EAST 40.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 53"37'33" EAST 55.29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 55"37'37" EAST 158.19 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 66"28'32" EAST 79.22 FEET;
9IJ{Y21J04... 127230 ver: Ol!- BSTOCKHAM
~
0375&-CJOO.OOO--O
2
WilsanMiller'
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
...,.,...: .
-
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - O.R.!. LANOS (CONTINUED),
THENCE SOUTH 81'19'48" EAST 69.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'53'08" EAST 96.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83'09'35" EAST 88.49 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75'58'08" EAST 57.96 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45'44'09" EAST 65.43 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 23'12'23" EAST 107.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 31'09'29" EAST 124.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 36'28'03" EAST 195.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41'49'01" EAST 193.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41'27'57" EAST 187.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 50'06'28" EAST 177.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'06'03" EAST 103.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'07'11" EAST 76.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'49'02" EAST 61.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41'11'10" EAST 266.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'45'15" EAST 203.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 63'26'06" EAST 230.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 55'12'54" EAST 17.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06'58'17" WEST 40.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60'20'46" EAST 94.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14'42'46" EAST 42.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52'22'08" EAST 29.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05'13'18" EAST 37.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 07" 13'16" WEST 185.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08'55'50" WEST 66.36 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 08'35'26" WEST 70.11 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03'30'28" EAST 24.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09'22'28" EAST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32'03'11" EAST 61.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41'59'52" EAST 54.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46'38'59" EAST 44.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 40'19'34" EAST 80.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39'30'46" EAST 42.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"07'39" EAST 71.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60"17'11" EAST 55.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68'43'34" EAST 63.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'12'19" EAST 41.51 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75'32'58" EAST 74.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78'55'50" EAST 42.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'31'07" EAST 36.80 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 75'37'20" EAST 34.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 72'08'39" EAST 57.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56'52'50" EAST 70.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"52'18" EAST 99.31 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70'35'59" EAST 56.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85'12'15" EAST 70.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85"47'37" EAST 52.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64'20'23" EAST 9.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23'58'25" EAST 60.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39'27'42" EAST 136.06 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 18'12'03" EAST 123.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"26'30" WEST 137.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45'55'34" WEST 133.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'43'21" WEST 101.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"06'53" WEST 375.05 FEET;
Q'3OI2Q04- 127230 Vet'". 0\1- BSTOCKHAM
~,
OJ7B6-OOQ-O(lO--O
3
WilsonMiller
.
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
8e
.
-
.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - O.R.I. LANDS (CONTINUED);
THENCE SOUTH 86031'55" WEST 296.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02029'11" WEST 25,06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85019'00" WEST 63,79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87001'35" WEST 57.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85014'11" WEST 27.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86011'09" WEST 22.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71001'47" WEST 25.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74057'44" WEST 25.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80042'24" WEST 41.73 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 77000'19" WEST 49.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78026'56" WEST 104.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78045'16" WEST 195,82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79021'51" WEST 81.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76030'15" WEST 38.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70033'36" WEST 13.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53058'21" WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53"58'22" WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43009'08" WEST 16.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34052'31" WEST 30.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37"08'48" WEST 31.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45000'00" WEST 37.06 FEET;
THENCE NORIH 43028'45" WEST 29.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52029'45" WEST 40.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53028'16" WEST 25.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69051'49" WEST 23.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72053'50" WEST 40.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74038'02" WEST 101.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76025'14" WEST 79.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73050'34" WEST 83.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"16'32" WEST 71.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70044'15" WEST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75044'50" WEST 240.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76022'29" WEST 54.20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75046'41" WEST 12.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78006'45" WEST 243.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"32'28" WEST 438.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86036'21" WEST 1,109.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77000'11" WEST 142.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 17"30'03" WEST 10.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21030'05" EAST 36.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 30057'50" WEST 6.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73010'43" WEST 139.18 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 11046'06" WEST 25.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05042'38" WEST 20.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04023'55" WEST 13.47 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 50011'40" WEST 8.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83059'28" WEST 19.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84057'27" WEST 35.25 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 83049'48" WEST 38.44 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 80044'23" WEST 96.27 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79048'04" WEST 449.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77049'57" WEST 284.20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83039'35" WEST 93.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87039'46" WEST 101.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84025'40" WEST 85.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77028'16" WEST 95.22 FEET;
9IJ(V2004- 1Z7230 Ver: 01'. BSTOCKHAM
~
03786-000-000-.0
-+
WilsonMillei
.
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
8C~
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.1. LANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 77"23'45" WEST 170.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"57'50" WEST 76.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"26'38" WEST 35.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"46'31" WEST 41.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48"48'50" WEST 43.91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"14'43" WEST 134.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"58'24" WEST 611.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 338.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44"41'45" WEST 412.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"26'06" WEST 267.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"27'29" WEST 200.89 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 66"02'14" EAST 12.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"52'12" EAST 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03"20'45" EAST 73.83 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 85"25'42" WEST 6.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" WEST 10.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70"27'48" WEST 16.99 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"18'36" WEST 14.89 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 75"57'49" WEST 17.03 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 87"16'25" WEST 10.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"20'58" WEST 16.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35"32'16" WEST 17.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 26"33'54" WEST 17.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"11'21" WEST 16.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01"52'04" WEST 47.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"05'16" WEST 336.69 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 00"29'38" WEST 299.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"56'29" WEST 220.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"52'19" EAST 237.57 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"46'52" WEST 113.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"00'00" EAST 13.43 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 14"02'10" EAST 8.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" EAST 5.84 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 71 "33'54" EAST 9.80 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 82"24'19" EAST 15.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"12'02" EAST 222.07 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 86"36'31" EAST 69.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82"38'52" EAST 32.28 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 70"49'16" EAST 25.15 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 60"38'32" EAST 18.96 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62"44'41" EAST 38.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"08'30" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"42'34" EAST 25.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"18'31" EAST 32.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"58'54" EAST 43.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 56"01'25" EAST 57.29 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 52"34'43" EAST 171.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"53'54" EAST 75.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"37'17" EAST 47.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35"48'12" EAST 77.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30"21'29" EAST 83.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 22"37'12" EAST 67.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13"36'02" EAST 32.94 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"28'13" EAST 66.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 1 0"57'15" EAST 65.22 FEET;
9IJOI2~ 127230 Ver. 01'. 8SfCOY~~\
~
03786-000-00O--0
)
WilsonMiller.
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
~'8C
~
~
-
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 3D THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHI81T "A" - D.R.I. LANDS (CONTINUEO):
THENCE NORTH 11 '18'36" EAST 21.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16'41'58" EAST 10.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45'00'00" EAST 10.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"23'33" EAST 15.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64"39'14" EAST 21.71 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67"47'47" EAST 163.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64'59'39" EAST 161.25 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 66'22'14" EAST 18.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72'53'50" EAST 28.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" EAST 14.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'18'55" EAST 35.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'36'10" EAST 42.36 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" EAST 28.92 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 82'45'47" EAST 16.40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 61'55'39" EAST 17.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'34'35" EAST 118.02 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 81'56'55" EAST 17.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'43'15" EAST 124.39 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 13'46'19" WEST 328.58 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 70'48'07" EAST 76.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54'29'06" EAST 37.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 21 '53'45" WEST 54.48 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 70'47'14" EAST 77.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71"02'31" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"16'21" EAST 131.70 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 72"04'43" EAST 126.98 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 73'13'18" EAST 106.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71"11'17" EAST 74.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68'33'08" EAST 30.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71'33'54" EAST 17.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'15'14" EAST 13.52 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 83'05'20" EAST 17.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47"43'35" EAST 15.29 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 37'20'58" EAST 24.58 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16'38'20" EAST 46.68 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 24'10'17" EAST 35.78 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21 '52'45" EAST 70.36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34'33'45" EAST 28.09 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 47"26'12" EAST 34.20 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52'25'53" EAST 8.43 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 71 '33'54" EAST 9.75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85'01'49" EAST 11.87 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87'08'15" EAST 20.59 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'25'50" EAST 37.54 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 87'33'48" EAST 48.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89'35'00" EAST 141.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'06'34" EAST 99.23 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 84'31'51" EAST 48.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'20'00" EAST 26.97 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 79'46'40" EAST 31.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'27'51" EAST 28.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70'23'45" EAST 39.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70'48'11" EAST 134.46 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 70'37'19" EAST 79.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66'32'28" EAST 29.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 57'49'44" EAST 37.66 FEET;
BI3lY2QO(. n1Z30 Vef". 01'- 6STDCKHAM
,-,
03700-000-000--0
6
WilstinMillei
.
New Directions In Plannina, Design & Engineering
8e
."
-
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9. 16 AND 17. TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIOA
EXHIBIT "A" - O.RI. LANDS (CONTINUEO):
THENCE NORTH 53021'57" EAST 74.96 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 54024'59" EAST 148.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50050'35" EAST 203.54 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 48043'53" EAST 33.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32023'52" EAST 31.67 FEET;
THENCE 334.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 272.48 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70024'48" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 06025'03" WEST 314.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41037'27" WEST 133.18 FEET:
THENCE 184.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWEST HAVING
A RADIUS OF 573.36 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18026'50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY
A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 50050'52" WEST 183.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60004'16" WEST 149.32 FEET;
THENCE 44.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84041'37" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 17"43'30" WEST 40.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24037'19" EAST 671.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23058'37" EAST 211.35 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 27045'05" EAST 100.63 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 34051'48" EAST 129.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36014'23" EAST 119.58 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 39015'14" EAST 61.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30037'48" EAST 96.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31009'42" EAST 136.09 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 31057'25" EAST 103.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32039'03" EAST 134.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 28"32'24" EAST 53.34 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 31015'49" EAST 35.90 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 36052'12" EAST 24.66 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 53049'13" EAST 22.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59030'01" EAST 46.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58016'35" EAST 70.87 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 46049'06" EAST 48.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34036'20" EAST 66.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36023'58" EAST 266.89 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 35028'00" EAST 51.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24013'40" EAST 48.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20029'50" EAST 62.60 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 17"32'36" EAST 44.54 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 11002'07" EAST 134.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09020'41" EAST 65.81 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 08049'13" EAST 32.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02007'16" WEST 14"81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 19058'59" WEST 12.83 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 29055'53" WEST 20.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45000'00" WEST 56.96 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 48051'56" WEST 57.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42038'48" WEST 28.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38047'48" WEST 35"86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43025'04" WEST 39.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36022'11" EAST 30.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23054'19" EAST 139.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66053'26" EAST 241.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 64045'28" EAST 263"29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71018'47" EAST 57m FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85007'33" EAST 50.51 FEET:
~127230Ver()1'.HSTOCC;HAM
~
Cl3786-000-(l(l<'.-O
WilSlinMiller
.
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
.
-
OESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. ANO PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.!. LANOS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 81'05'07" EAST 75.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'43'21" EAST 63.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'57'08" EAST 36.24 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86'25'39" EAST 63.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81'31'21" EAST 262.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'08'03" EAST 273.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'58'13" EAST 327.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67'50'56" EAST 252.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'02'01" EAST 819.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'42'41" EAST 310.84 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 65'34'43" EAST 80.72 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 89'59'47" EAST 219.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'42'28" EAST 41.19 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'02'38" EAST 138.72 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 41'09'18" EAST 91.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'57'36" EAST 83.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'51'58" EAST 305.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'38'43" EAST 343.90 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 87'28'42" EAST 503.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'46'01" EAST 328.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37'30'20" EAST 357.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15032'08" EAST 149.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86055'36" EAST 261.44 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 72053'31" EAST 576.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50045'14" EAST 202.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87014'14" EAST 314.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76038'32" EAST 143.08 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 89049'43" EAST 1,054.71 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75020'32" EAST 42.85 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 41043'41" EAST 38.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59044'48" EAST 101.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82056'38" EAST 71.89 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 76031'27" EAST 68.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60032'45" EAST 175.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78018'10" EAST 41.23 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 89028'30" EAST 480.22 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 82052'57" EAST 82.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59026'48" EAST 47.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77036'27" EAST 12.36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70055'29" EAST 16.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47041'12" EAST 748.88 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34'06'49" EAST 46.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14016'24" EAST 615.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85059'44" EAST 160.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47006'44" EAST 110.60 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29011'18" EAST 460.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13056'57" EAST 209.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76019'41" EAST 160.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 61043'54" EAST 107.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18058'36" EAST 69.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01036'49" WEST 341.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89006'53" EAST 584.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CAMP KEIAS ROAD (80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00014'32" EAST 45.99 FEET:
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 05051'27" WEST 224.83 FEET;
QI3lY.lOO4- 121230 VI':<". 01!- BSTOCKHA.M
"'"'
037!l6-(l(lO.ooo..O
8
WilsDnMiller"
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
.
...
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17. TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36.
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.1. LANOS (CONTINUED):
THENCE cONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 95.78 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,798.14 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'26'42" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
SOUTH 05'04'45" WEST 95.78 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 26'31'54" WEST 759.71 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00'14'33" EAST 1,537.82 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 2,347.87 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 89'29'01" EAST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CAMP KEIAS ROAD (80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 200.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 89'29'01" WEST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING 9 COURSES:
1. SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 62.31 FEET;
2. SOUTH 00'30'10" EAST 2,674.23 FEET;
3. SOUTH 00'35'31" EAST 2,684.53 FEET;
4. SOUTH 00'38'11" EAST 2,610.24 FEET;
5. SOUTH 00'30'34" EAST 199.67 FEET;
6. 227.68 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
3,032.95 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'18'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'39'36" EAST 227.63 FEET:
7. SOUTH 04'48'38" EAST 400.93 FEET;
8. SOUTH 05'08'04" EAST 83.53 FEET;
9. SOUTH 00'29'16" EAST 1672.20 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89'04'49" WEST 604.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47'03'54" WEST 98.67 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 52'55'08" WEST 87.29 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 06'39'26" WEST 102.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71'24'17" WEST 367.36 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 19'54'41" WEST 104.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'05'38" WEST 251.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11'04'29" EAST 79.58 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 05'51 '31" WEST 66.56 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 48'52'26" WEST 332.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74'56'35" WEST 80.29 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 74'58'06" WEST 235.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51'40'42" WEST 93.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21'53'05" WEST 241.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 77'21'09" WEST 341.17 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60'48'05" WEST 79.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'09'54" WEST 265.68 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 89'36'53" WEST 1 ,997.38 FEET;
THENCE 77.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 739.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'00'22" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'53'58" EAST 77.51 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00'38'28" EAST 84.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" WEST 71.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00'38'46" EAST 3,444.22 FEET;
THENCE 224.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,721.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'43'02" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01'44'02" WEST 223.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04'05'59" WEST 217.57 FEET;
g(.l0l2004-121230 Vef01'.BsrOC",'.\.M
,-,
03786-o00-ooo--0
,)
r-"
Be
.
WilstinMiller"
.
New Directions/n Planning, Design & Engineering
-.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA
EXHIBIT "A" - 0.R.1. LANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE 153.40 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,277.17 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03"51'35" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02"10'28" WEST 153.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06"34'56" EAST 1,190.32 FEETTOA POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF SAID OIL WELL ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 88"54'34" WEST 256.81 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,9 _ ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT SEM NTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD,
BEAR G S D ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16 BEING SOUTH 88"54'34"
WE
. .M. LS#5627
BY
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #LB-43
REF: 4H-125, SHEETS 1-5
DATE; AUGUST 29, 2003
REVISIONS: 1. OCTOBER 16, 2003
2. MARCH 3, 2004
3. SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
9IJGIZOO4- 127230 Ver: 011- BSTOCKHAM
~
0CI7B&-00CI-000--O
10
1------
'I 1l~~~~~~ ~
I ~~~.!t~~~ ::(
I
I
~~tB~~~~ ~
0'1 N ~ ~ ~
'iij
"
C
.
~ u ~.><.
iIJ '- .... '-
1::'" ..., 1'.:1 v '"
~6QJ2g;~
<{ e;. \5 ~ of oE
~ ~ u v.8 :l)':)
, ~ r.:: <;:C u E '-
O_:i:~O>~E~
;;::322~J:35
: i
j
! Ii\.
! ,.e
_.:1..1""
~_._~-,-~----_.
--.J'
,.....
'-'
'f,
,,(I' ,
, ,.
:1
;",::; ..,....J C,;""_
~" :;.
I
I, 'r
',,:;:'
"
i
I
C;'
,.'
!
if"
.,......."
i \
..J
"
,
L.......i
rr-.n,
H
,'1
'\
I,
il'
r--,
,
I
;
I IiI I
I
I
I
r
!
j
"
.;- -~
.
:y'......,"OOt
""'/':aoo.
ii"
II',"
i i
I
.'",
,. t
II
Ii!:
~
I
J
I
'I' " I
ili !iJ j..:...lJ
iil! i V /'
(
.i \ .!II~
il '~\' \ \
11 ' \ '
I,' l }1' \
1 /" \
1-///1)' :
, '
r' \ ,-
,1,--< ',r'
,! -.; 't", /' "c.-,J
"Ii'
~-
, '-.,
,jl=-
.,--,-,
(': 1;
),t n~,
t i}r:;--;:) , 4'
:I"~~ blJ
,il(
il,
,
,
j
~-~]
'---1
I i
1 '
, !
, ,
I
,
i
I
I
~
~,
',,-
i'(
~ ":i<
".-
It,
ilb II
i
I
""-.."......
/
-~
Exhibit "c"
.' ."',;:."._.....,,,.,~-,,.,,,.,..,.,...;'" .".... ,"'. ,,<
\
I I
[it 8e
, ,
I ,
,
,
It
-
,Ii ,
t '~
, ,.) "
"' I '''''\1'" "-"r.'
'f ",~~ " Ii
,- , ,
il ~~ I h " I J
Ii ,
'if: 1 I'I
\.'.~"
,..-.,.,.' ,
, ,. ,
.~}
]
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
AVE MARIA
" 8e
.
THIS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and
entered into this day of April, 2005, by and between AVE MARIA DEVELOPMENT,
LLLP, a limited liability Florida Limited Partnership, formerly known as New Town
Development, LLLP ("Developer") whose address is 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples,
Florida 34105, and TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AS TIlE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, ("County"), All
capitalized terms not defmed herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Collier
County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, Ordinance No, 2001-13, as amended.
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, the Ave Maria Stewardship Community District ("District") was created and
established on April 23, 2004, by Act passed by the House of Representatives House Bill 1625,
effective June 17,2004; and
WHEREAS, within the boundaries of the District, Barron Collier Company has made
available approximately 905 acres to the Ave Maria University, Inc, for the institution and
operation of a private university known as Ave Maria University with a full slate of
undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs with related cultural, recreational, and other
activities, benefits and programs for providing teaching, research, and public services to
southwest Florida, the State of Florida, and the Nation; and
WHEREAS, as set forth in the February 2005 Recommendations of the Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council Development of Regional Impact Assessment for the "Town
of Ave Maria," DRI #07-0304-167, there is to be created the 4,995-acre Town of Ave Maria, to
be located just north of Oil Well Road and adjacent to Camp Keais, which proposed Town at
buildout will include 11 ,000 residential units which will house an estimated 24,200 residents,
690,000 gross square feet of retaiVservice, 510,000 square feet of office, 400 hotel rooms, a
6,000-student university, 450 units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic,
community and miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, a public K-8
school and a K-12 private school, with a proposed buildout to be completed in two 5-year phases
with construction anticipated to commence in 2006, and continue through 2016; and
WHEREAS, for this development to proceed, substantial road improvements are
required, including the urban four larring of Oil Well Road, with provision for future six laning,
between Immokalee Road and Camp Keais Road (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, to accelerate these improvements and to facilitate the future four laning of
Camp Keais Road to Immokalee Road, and Immokalee Road north of Camp Keais into the urban
area of Immokalee, Developer has agreed: (1) to donate certain right-of-way and other
consideration; (2) to fund the cost of designing and permitting the section of Oil Well Road from
Immokalee Road to Camp Keais Road in exchange for impact fee credits; and (3) to provide fill
to the County at its cost, all of which will be of significant benefit to the County's transportation
network; and
Page 1 of8
Exhibit "0"
WHEREAS, in addition to the donation of right-of-way and impact fee credits resulting
from the advancement of design and construction of an Oil Well Road segment, the developer
will be paying in excess of Sixty Million ($60,000,000) dollars in road impact fees to pay for the
construction of the additional capacity being provided by the widening of Oil Well Road and
other roadways within the area; and
BC
.
-
WHEREAS, the Town of Ave Maria will be the fIrst implementation of the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area (RLSA) program, a program which implements the provisions of Chapter 163-
3 I 77(1 1)( d) Florida Statutes (2004); the RLSA program being an innovative and incentive based
program for planning, protection of natural resources, and development in the rural area of
Collier County, and
WHEREAS, the "RLSA" program has signifIcant public benefIts for Collier County and
the Irnmokalee area; and
WHEREAS, the Irnmokalee area and its economic development will greatly benefIt from
the proposed road improvements to Oil Well Road, Camp Keais Road, and Irnmokalee Road
contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, the Transportation Administrator has recommended to the Board of County
COmmissioners that the plan for donation as set forth in this Agreement ("Proposed Plan") is in
conformity with contemplated improvements and additions to the County's transportation
network and that it will be advantageous to the public for Developer to donate and contribute the
right-of-way described herein; and
WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration by the Board of Commissioners, the Board has
authorized the County Attorney to prepare this Agreement upon the Board finding that:
a, The subject Proposed Plan is in conformity with the contemplated improvements
and additions to the County's transportation system;
b, Such Proposed Plan, viewed in conjunction with other existing or proposed plans,
including those from other developers, will not adversely impact the cash flow or
liquidity of the County's road impact fee trust accounts in such a way as to
frustrate or interfere with other planned or ongoing growth necessitated capital
improvements and additions to the County's transportation system;
c, The Proposed Plan is consistent with both the public interest and with the
County's existing Comprehensive Plan;
d, Except for the right-of-way donation for which impact fee credits are waived, the
proposed time schedule for completion of the Proposed Plan is consistent with the
most recently adopted fIve-year capital improvement program for the County's
transportation system and park system; and
WHEREAS, Developer has paid the Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500,00)
application fee for this Agreement:
Page 2 of8
8e
.
-
WIT N E SSE T H:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10,00) and other good and
valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants
contained above and herein, and the fact that all of the above recitals are true and correct and
shaIl be fully incOlporated herein and fonn part of the basis for this Agreement, the parties agree
as follows:
1. Within 90 days from the effective date of this Agreement, Developer will convey
the right-of-way legaIly described and graphicaIly depicted in Composite Exhibit "A" ("Donated
Land") to the County for the widening of the road segments, This conveyance shall be at no cost
to the County, The Donated Land will be sufficient to provide a two hundred (200') foot wide
corridor for said road segments and will aIlow reconfiguration of the intersection of the Camp
Keais and ImmokaIee Roads, Developer shaIl convey the Donated Land to the County in fee
simple, free and clear of all liens and encwnbrances, by statutory warranty deed, the fonn of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B", The County will be responsible for paying the costs of
any title work and searches, and Developer shaIl be responsible at all costs for promptly
removing or curing any liens, encwnbrances or deficiencies revealed in any title work,
Developer will promptly provide the Office of the County Attorney with an executed deed,
suitable for recording, Upon receipt, the County shaIl record the deed in the Public Records of
the County, The Developer shaIl asswne all costs associated with the recordation of the deeds,
Once Camp Keais Road between ImmokaIee Road and Oil Well Road has been improved and the
intersection of Camp Keais Road and ImmokaIee Road reconfigured in six lane configuration,
County agrees to abandon any existing right-of-way of the now existing Camp Keais Road and
ImmokaIee Road that will not be utilized in the reconfigured Camp Keais Road in the vicinity of
said intersection,
2, The Donated Land encompasses approximately 156 acres, (approximately 13
miles of road frontage) whose purpose includes creating a 200-foot right-of-way aIong Oil Well
Road, Camp Keais Road and IInmokaIee Road north of the intersection of Camp Keais Road into
the ImmokaIee urban area Developer estimates the estimated current vaIue of the road segments
right-of-way donation at seven million, eight hundred thousand ($7,800,000) dollars. In addition
to the Donated Land, for the purpose of providing sufficient stonnwater drainage for the portion
of the road segments adjoining the Donated Land, the Developer shaIl freely provide, at no cost
to the County and without any impact fee credits, (l) at least 3 acres of suitable land per mile of
road, or (2) will accept such stonnwater into existing Developer-owned or controlled stonnwater
systems, or (3) a proportionate combination of the above at Developer's option, It is estimated
that if the County had to mitigate stonnwater for said road adjacent to the Donated Land, it
would be required to acquire approximately 33 acres, Developer estimates the cost savings to the
County of said stonnwater mitigation to be approximately $1,500,000, The parties acknowledge
that the conveyance of the Donated Land is characterized as property rights acquired by a
highway or road agency for the improvement of a road within the boundaries of a public right of
way,
3, The Developer shaIl fully pay for the capitaI costs of traffic signaIs at any access
point from the Town of Ave Maria on Oil Well or Camp Keais Roads when deemed warranted
Page 3 of8
8e
.
-
by the Collier County Transportation Department. The signals will be owned, operated and
maintained by Collier County,
4. The parties acknowledge that the land donation made pursuant to this Developer
Contribution Agreement is an integral part of and a necessary accommodation to the Collier
County transportation network.
5. The Developer has agreed not to receive impact fee credits from its donation of
the Donated Land, but is utilizing the donation, as well as the stormwater accommodation, the
Fill and Design and Permitting as a pipelining effort to mitigate the impacts of the Town of Ave.
Maria on the transportation network impacted by the Town of Ave Maria, together with the other
commitments herein,
6, Prior to providing the executed deed, Developer will provide attorneys' opinions
identifYing the record owners of the Donated Land, setting forth the authority of the record owner
to enter into this Agreement, and identifYing any lien holders having a lien or encumbrance on
the Donated Land, The opinion will specifically describe each of the recorded instruments under
which the record owner holds title, each lien or encumbrance, and cite appropriate recording
information and incorporate by reference a copy of all such referenced instruments. The
attorneys' opinions will also set forth the legal authority of Paul Marinelli to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the Developer,
7. Developer has agreed to provide, at its cost to the County, without any impact fees
credits, sufficient fill for the Project and for the future urban design four laning of Camp Keais
Road with provision for six laning, from Oil Well Road to Immokalee Road, then north on
Immokalee Road to the existing four lane section in the Immokalee urban area, upon the
following terms and conditions, Developer has identified a site adjacent to Oil Well Road that
would be an appropriate site from which to obtain the necessary fill for the Project; the site being
described and depicted in Composite Exhibit "C", Developer will file a conditional use
application for earth mining on the site, Once the conditional use application is granted,
Developer will provide fill on the site for reimbursement of its cost. Cost shall include the costs
of obtaining conditional use approval, permitting, mining, stockpiling and loading of the fill
material. Fill for the improvements to Camp Keais Road will be provided from an expansion of
the site identified in Composite Exhibit "C" or from another location fairly proximate to Camp
Keais Road, subject to conditional use approval for either alternative, Developer estimates the
cost savings to the County from this provision is approximately $11 million, This commitment
shall expire if the Town of Ave Maria achieves buildout prior to the expansion of Camp Keais
Road,
8, In order to accelerate the Project, Developer has agreed to pay for the cost of
design and permitting for the Project, which is estimated to be six million ($6,000,000) dollars,
which amounts shall be eligible for transportation impact fees as set forth below, Any mitigation
shall be part of the construction contract and not part of design and permitting, Developer will
provide County with a set of Design Plans which must meet the County's standard requirements
for design plans. County will be provided with 30/60/90/100% plans for review, and shall have
the right to require public meetings for the 30/60/90% plans, All plans are subject to approval by
Page 4 of8
.
,*' 8 C
.
the County, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, Upon receipt of the
final Design Plans, County will competitively bid out the Project.
9, Once the County has received [mal Design Plans and all necessary permits
pursuant to paragraph 8 hereof, County agrees to bid and award a contract to construct the Proj ect
as soon as practicable, but within six (6) months, assuming no bid protest and absent force
majeur, The contract shall provide for the Project to be constructed in three phases as set forth
below, The County commits that construction of the First and Second Phase will commence
within a commercially reasonably time after award of the contract.
(a) First Phase - Immokalee Road to Everglades Blvd, more or less
(b) Second Phase - Camp Keais Road to Camp Keais Strand, more or less
(c) Third Phase - completion of the Project
The Developer commits that its road impact fees through 2007 will equal $6,500,000.
After the payment of $6,500,000 of road impact fees, Developer may utilize impact fee credits
for 50% of road impact fees due from that date until all credits are utilized, The County commits
to construct the Third Phase upon sufficient impact fees from the applicable Impact Fee Districts
being available for said construction, All road impact fees from District 5 and adjoining Impact
Fee Districts shall be prioritized for the Project after the necessary funds to complete the existing.
Immokalee Road project. The County, in good faith, commits to complete construction of the
Project by 2010, subject to its road impact fee structure remaining substantially intact, receipt of
sufficient road impact fees, and delays caused by matters typically considered to be force majeur.
10, The parties are hopeful of obtaining funds from the State of Florida to assist with
improvements to the Road Segments, whether in the form of grants or loans from the State
Infrastructure Banle Developer agrees to assist County in developing grant and loan applications
and to use all reasonable efforts to obtain State funding to assist in paying for improvements to
the Road Segments.
11. This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Local Govemment Development Agreement Act.
12, The credit for the Road Impact Fees identified in this Agreement shall run with
the land identified in Exhibit "D" and shall be reduced by the entire amount of the Impact Fee for
that Public Facility due for each Building Permit issued thereon until the Development project is
either completed or the credits are exhausted or are no longer available, or have been assigned by
operation of or pursuant to an assignment agreement with the County. The foregoing reduction
in the Impact Fee credit shall be calculated based on the amount of the Impact Fees for that
Public Facility in effect at the time the Building Permit is applied for. The credit shall specify
the specific type of Public Facility Impact Fee to which it shall apply (roads) and shall not apply
to any other type of Public Facility Impact Fee, The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding
upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to
this Agreement.
Page 5 of8
8e
13, The amount of road impact fee credits to be granted under this Agreement is
approximately SIX MILLION DOLLARS ($6,000,000), Attached hereto as Exhibit "E", in
recognition of the developer contribution herein, is a copy of the Impact Fee Ledger setting forth
the amount of Road Impact Fee Credits granted pursuant to this Agreement, which will be
adjusted based on final costs for design and permitting.
.-
14, Developer acknowledges that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve either the applicant or owner, or their Successors or
assigns, of the necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said
permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions,
15, The terms of this Agreement are intended, along with the payment of all
applicable impact fees, to meet the requirements of Section 9J 2,045, Florida Administrative
Code, including fulfilling the Developer's proportionate share obligation and providing full
mitigation for the Town of Ave Maria impacts on the regional road network. Developer's
commitments herein include "Pipelining" the construction of a critical link in the County's road
network; and providing additional cost saving benefits to future road segments impacted by the
Town of Ave Maria.
16, The pipelining option is an approved form of mitigation which provides for the
aggregation of a project's incremental impacts on a number of roadways, resulting in an
improvement on one (or more) of the impacted roadways, This concept allows for the provision
of roadway capacity, when it might not otherwise be provided, Through pipelining, a roadway
improvement is constructed, building the capacity needed to maintain concurrency. In order to
facilitate the use of the pipelining option that in this case causes a major roadway improvement
to be constructed in advance of the Project's impacts, and in order to ensure a consistent road
impact fee revenue stream, the County is entering into an InterIocal Agreement with the Ave
Maria Stewardship Community District ("District") whereby the County will reserve to the
District sufficient capacity on the County's road public facilities to complete the buildout of the
Town of Ave Maria,
17, In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this
Agreement, which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with
the terms of this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as is
necessary to comply with such laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this Agreement.
18, Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended or
cancelled by mutual written consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest,
19, This Agreement shall be recorded by the County in the Official Records of Collier
County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after the County enters into this Agreement.
Developer shall pay all costs of recording this Agreement. A copy of the recorded document will
be provided to Developer upon request.
20, In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use the
County's then current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Following the conclusion of
this procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
Page 6 of 8
STR_DOCUMENT_ VIEW
Page 2 of3
8e
.
.......
County to enforce the termS' of thi~ Agreement, said remed)l being cwnulative with It
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement,
21. AJIy future relm bursemen t for exCe5S credits shall come from future I
the County of Road hnpact Fees. However, no reimbursement shall be paid until such
development, as defined by the Transportation Adminirnator at the location that was
the credit has been completed, Such reimbursement shall be made over a period offiv
from the completion of the Developm6llt.
22, An annual review and audit of performance under this Agreemen
performed by the County to determine whether or not there has be6ll demonstrated
compliance with the tenns of this Agreement and to r"Port the credit applied toward ~
roild implWt fees and the balance of available unused credit If the Collier Count)
Commissioners finds, on the basis of substantial com.petent evidence, that there has bel
to comply with the terms of this Agreem6llt, the Agreement may be rev\lked or I
modified by the County,
23, This AgTeement and the commitments herein shall become effective
DR! Development Order, SRA designation for the Town of Ave Maria and Ann~
Engineers permit for the Town of Ave Maria become final and effective, If the To
Maria DR! or SRA do not become final, or the ACOE pennit for the Town of Ave r.,.
received and become effective before December 31. 2006, this Agreement and all '
hereunder shall be null and void provided however, that Developer will retain the
$6,OOO,{){)0 in impact fee credits received in exchange for the Design PIll11ll and Permi1
impact file credits may be utili2:ed immedia.tely.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partiCli hereto have caused this Agreement to 'c
by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written.
Attillit: ' ,
DWIGHT E,;:;B~a&, Glerk
r',.1 .,,",
BY:~" "', ,
... ~~$t'; ! ~
, .~s l_t;Wre Q!il
w~sfi~s; - !!,' "
, '.
. . .......': ' . . . . . . I . : ....,.~..;
',~ . ~t ::.\"
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
By: ~W, ~
FRED W, COYLE, Chairm
AVB MARIA DEVELOPMENT, LLLP,
limited liability limited partnership
It. ~JJ- yjJ4
Print Name: 1>,"~' ~"~'L
.,~~- .
By: " ' ::&?~4
Pa.ul Marinelli
http://www.c\erk.collier.f1.us/WEBLINK/Doc View.asp?DocumentID= 17516&FolderID=I... 6/2112005
STR_DOCUMENT_ VIEW
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
Page 2 of3
Be
~
'<IiI
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thlsJd
mAY , 2005, by Paul Marinelli, lllI 'Ru,,~1 ~r:of }
Development, LllP, He ili [~ersonally known to me, OJ [ ] has produced driver's
as identification,
(SEAL)
Appmve<:l
JcflIC}' A. K
\
NOTARY P\l!U Co StA!'! OF FLOIlIDA
W Trilhl A. Alters
CommlllloD 11I00892198
BJcpllWl PES. 10, :1009
Ik> TMo All."llo ...<lfn& Co '. 1M.
n'suffici=y:
, nislanl c.,unty A tklmey
~^-~~, &t)[JS-
NOTARY P~HA A. AKERS
Name~
(Type or Print)
My Commission Expires: FQ3. 10, 2J::D
http;/ /www.clerk.collier.fl.us/WEBLINK/Doc View,asp?DocumentID= 17 516&F olderID= I... 6/21/2005
Agenda Item a. C
April 26, 2005
Page 6 of 46
r.
-
ThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
RESERVATION OF SUFFICIENT ROAD PUBLIC FACILITIES
TIllS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _
day of April, 2005, by and between THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE A VB MARlA
SlEW ARDSHIP COMMUNITY DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "District," an
independent special district created by and established by and in Chapter 2004-461, Laws of
Florida (2004), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLmR COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLmR COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as
"County." All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in
the Collier County Land Development Code as of the date hereof and Chapter 2004-461, Laws
of Florida (2004),
R E C I TAL S:
WHEREAS, the Ave Maria Stewardship Community District ("District") was created
and established on April 23, 2004, by Act passed by the Florida Legislature, Chapter 2004-461,
Laws of Florida (2004); and
WHEREAS, within the boundaries of the District, Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP has
made available approximately 905 acres to the A ve Maria University, Inc., for the institution and
operation of a private university known as Ave Maria University with a full slate of
undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs with related cultural, recreational, and other
activities, benefits and programs for providing teaching, research, and public services to
southwest Florida, the State of Florida, and the Nation; and
WHEREAS, as set forth in the February 2005 Recommendations of the Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council Development of Regional Impact Assessment for the ''Town
of Ave Maria," DRI #07-0304-167 and proposed DRI Development Order, there is to be created
the 4,995 acre Town of Ave Maria, to be located just north of Oil Well Road and adjacent to
Camp Keais, which proposed Town at buildout will include 11,000 residential units, 690,000
gross square feet of retaiVservice, 510,000 square feet of office, 400 hotel rooms, 6,ooo-student
university, 450 units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and
miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, a public K-8 school and a K-12
private school, with a proposed buildout to be completed in two 5-year phases with construction
anticipated to commence in 2006, and continue through 2016; and
WHEREAS, for this development to be built out, substantial road improvements are
required, including four lane improvements to Oil Well Road between Immokalee Road and
Camp Keais Road (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, to accelerate these improvements and to facilitate the future four laning of
Camp Keais Road to Immokalee Road, concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, the
County has entered into a Developer Agreement with Ave Maria Development, LLLP (the
"Developer"), wherein the Developer has agreed: (1) to donate an estimated $7,800,000 in
certain right-of-way and provide for storm water management adjacent to said right of way
Exhibit "E"
Agenda ItenEi. CD"'"
April 26, 200S
Page 7 of 46
."" .
_I
donation and other substantial consideration; and (2) to design and permit the four laning of a
section of Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to Camp Keais Road for impact fee credits; all
of which will be of significant benefit to the County's Transportation network; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the donation of right-of-way and impact fee credits resulting
from the advancement of design and construction of an Oil Well Road segment, the developer
will be paying in excess of $60 million dollars in road impact fees to pay for the construction of
the additional capacity being provided by the widening of Oil Well Road and other roadways
within the area; and
WHEREAS, the Developer and County would not be accelerating the widening of Oil
Well Road, and Developer would not be providing the County with substantial free right-of-way
and other valuable considerations, but for the fact that Developer is building a new University
and University Town in eastern Collier County, which University will greatly enhance the
economic and cultural life of the citizens of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ave Maria will be the first implementation of the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area (RLSA) program, a program which implements the provisions of Chapter 163-
3177(11)(d) Florida Statutes (2004); the RLSA program being an innovative and incentive based
program for planning, protection of natural resources, and development in the rura1 area of
Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the "RLSA" program has significant public benefits for Collier County and
the Irnmokalee area; and
WHEREAS, the Irnmokalee area and its economic development will greatly benefit from
the proposed road improvements to Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road; and
WHEREAS, given that the estimated buildout of the-Town of Ave Maria may exceed ten
years, there is a substantial concern by all parties that other property owners will take advantage
of the improvements to Oil Well Road and that their developments will utilize all available road
capacity to meet their concurrency needs prior to the completion of the buildout of the Town of
Ave Maria; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that:
(a) Collier County, by virtue of Section 1(t), Article VIII of the Florida Constitution,
Chapter 125, Fla. Stat" and Section 163.01, Fla. Stat., is a public agency with the power to
reserve to the District by interlocal agreement sufficient capacity on Collier County's road public
facilities to complete the buildout of the Town of Ave Maria;
(b) The District, pursuant to Ch. 2004-461, Laws of Florida, has the expressed
authority and duty to determine whether the exercise of any of its general and special powers in
carrying out its single limited and specialized pllIJlose (provision of infrastructure to the Ave
Maria Community) would interfere with reservations of sufficient road public facilities by the
2
Agenda I~I ~
4fiTI
Page 0 6
County and has the duty to detennine that any of the District's activities would not be
inconsistent therewith;
(c) Both the County and the District are public agencies which have certain rights,
powers, privileges and authority, shared in common, which each exercises and may exercise
separately;
(d) Each has the powers enumerated above which it can exercise separately that, by
interlocal agreement, the parties may exercise jointl~;
i
(e) Administration of this Agreement will be by the County Manager or his or her
designee as approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and by the
District Manager or his or her designee as approved by the Board of Supervisors of the District;
(f) The County and the District can use 'their respective powers held in common by
cooperating with each other on a basis of mutual advantage;
(g) That which induced the parties to bind themselves to this Agreement is their
reliance upon and authority under the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969, as amended,
section 163.01, FS, to make the most productive, accountable, fair, responsive, timely and
efficient use of their respective powers, and other gciod and valuable consideration. The essence
of this Agreement is a simple and informal divisiorl of duties by which the District provides to
the County written assurance when requested by the County that any final local development
order of the Developer is within the final approved DRI Development Order with specific
reference to the reservations by the County of sufficient road public facilities; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration and duly held public hearings on this matter by
both the County and District, the County and District have found that:
(a) This Agreement furthers the public purpose of the District and the County, their
constituents, taxpayers, local owners and residents, both present and future, and the Collier
County community as a whole; and
(b) The public will reap significant advantages associated with and emanating from
this Agreement.
W ITNES SETH:
NOW, TIffiREFORE, in consideration of ,Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I
i
1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below.
3
Agenda Item a. Co
April 26, 200S
Page 9 of 46
.
2. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of Section 163,01,
Florida Statutes and Chapter 2004-461, Laws of Florida (2004).
3. The parties have entered into this Agreement in good faith and covenant to
cooperate with each other in order to fulfill the intent of this Agreement so as to better serve the
residents of Collier County,
4, The proposed plan of development for the Town of Ave Maria at buildout is
attached as Exhibit "A," Upon the issuance of the final DRI Development Order, and any
amendment thereafter, Exhibit "A" will be modified to conform. The proposed phases and
anticipated timeline for build-out of the Town are attached as Exhibit "B,"
5, The County understands and agrees that the phases and timelines set forth in
Exhibit "B" are merely an estimate of absorption based on current conditions, and from a
Development of Regional Impact perspective, the controlling time for buildout is the termination
date of the Town of Ave Maria DRI Development Order, in this instance June 30, 2020. Further,
County understands and agrees that permitting issues, mobilization difficulties, and lack of
momentum could delay substantial development during the early years, and that the timelines
and phasing schedules (phases and timelines in Exhibit B) are subject to market conditions and
economic cycles beyond control of District or Developer.
6. Until the termination date of the proposed Town of Ave Maria DR! Development
Order on June 30, 2020, and provided that the University is constructed in-substantial conformity
with the proposed DRI Development Order, County will reserve to the District sufficient
capacity on Collier County's road public facilities to complete the buildout of the Town of Ave
Maria. It is understood that the Town of Ave Maria will be built in phases. As each final local
development order is issued for each phase, a certificate of public facility adequacy will be
issued, and transportation impact fees paid, in the manner then set forth in the Collier County
Land Development Code, and the reservation of such capacity to the District of road. public
facilities will be reduced by a like amount. Each time a final local development order is sought
for a project within the District, County may request that the District provide the County with
written assurance that such final local development order sought conforms to the Final
Development Order.
7. Following the seventh anniversary date of approval of the final DR! Development
Order, County shall conduct a review of performance under this Agreement to determine
whether or not there has been demonstrated good faith compliance with the terms of this
Agreement and that the project is proceeding in a timely manner to buildout. If the Collier
County Board of Commissioners finds, after consultation with the District, on the basis of
substantial competent evidence, that there has been a failure to comply with the terms of this
Agreement, or that the construction of the Town of Ave Maria is not proceeding in a
substantially timely manner to buildout, the Agreement may be modified or terminated by
agreement of the parties. The term substantially timely manner, as used herein, shall mean that
development is proceeding in a manner that buildout of the amount of development authorized
by the DRI Development Order could rationally be expected on or before the termination date of
the DRI on June 30, 2020. Upon termination of this Agreement, any unused capacity reserved
4
Agenda It::8. C
April 26, 2005
Page 10 of46
for public facilities will be released, and made available for other development in the area, with
future development of the Town of Ave Maria on an equal footing with all other development as
to compliance with the County's concurrency requirements.
8, If the Collier County Board of Commissioners finds that good faith compliance
with the terms of this Agreement has been demonstrated, and that the construction of the Town
of Ave Maria is proceeding in a substantially timely manner to buildout, then the County shall
continue to reserve the remaining unused capacity through buildout of the construction of the
Town of Ave Maria, to be utilized in the same manner as described in paragraph 7 above.
9. This Agreement does not create or contain any vested rights for the District or the
Developer. This Agreement is personal to the District, and may not be assigned, either in whole
or in part. The District's sole obligation pursuant to this Agreement is to give County written
assurance when requested that any final local development order sought is within the final
approved DRI Development Order,
10. In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this
Agreement, which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with
the terms of this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as
is necessary to comply with such laws, in a manner which best reflects the intent of this
Agreement.
11. The duration of this Agreement shall be for so long as the District, or its
successor-in-function, is functional and/or in existence, Otherwise, this Agreement shall only be
amended or terminated by the parties hereto upon mutual written agreement.
12. This Agreement shall be recorded by the County in the Official Records of Collier
County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after the County enters into this Agreement. District
shall pay all costs of recording this Agreement. A copy of the recorded document will be
provided to District within 15 days of recordaiion.
13, This Agreement shall not be construed or characterized as a development
agreement under the Florida Government Development Agreement Act.
14. The parties specifically acknowledge that the Collier County Subdivision
Regulations, the Collier County Building Codes, the Collier County Land Development Code, all
as amended, and their successors-in-function, are "governmental, planning, environmental and
land development regulation," and will be so recognized in light of any future analysis of
Chapter 2004-461, Laws of Florida (2004).
15. The parties confirm, agree and acknowledge that the Town of Ave Maria's SRA
Development Document and Collier County's Growth Management Plan, Land Development
and Building Codes, all as amended, and their successors and function, will and shall control
development within the District in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2004-461, Laws of
Florida (2004).~
5
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
,
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
j
I
I
Agenda Item a 1~
April 26, 200S
Page 11 of46
.
-
16. District acknowledges that the failure of this Agreement to address any pennit,
condition, term or restriction shall not relieve either the applicant or owner, or their successors or
assigns, of the necessity of complying with any law, ordinance, rule or regulation governing said
pennitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions.
17. In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, the parties shall first use the
County's then-current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure, Following the conclusion of
this procedure, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Collier
County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, said remedy being cumulative with any and all
other remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of this Agreement.
18. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Florida, The parties intend that the terms, and conditions and provisions of this
Agreement and any addenda to it may only be amended or modified in writing, executed duly
and validly by the parties in a timely and reasonable manner. Any waiver at any time by either
party hereto of its rights with respect to any matter arising in connection with the Agreement
shall not be considered a waiver of such rights or matters by either party at any subsequent time,
This Agreement shall take effect on the date above written and shall continue in effect until the
parties mutually detennine that it is no longer needed or until tennination pursuant to the terms
hereof.
19. This Agreement and the commitments herein shall become effective when the
DRI Development Order, SRA designation for the Town of Ave Maria and ACOE pennit for the
Town of Ave Maria become final and effective. If the Town of Ave Maria DRI or SRA do not
become final, or the ACOE permit for the Town of Ave Maria is not received and become
effective before December 31,2006, this Agreement and all obligations hereunder shall be null
and void.
20. Under Section 163.01(6)(7), FS, the parties agree that-administration of this
Agreement, including any implementing and practical procedures, shall be effected jointly by the
County Manager or his designee and the District Manager of his designee with periodic reports
to both boards. Written notice if and when appropriate shall be given to the parties at the
following addresses or such other person or place as each party shall designate by similar notice.
As to the District:
Peter L. Pimentel, District Manager
Special District Services, Inc,
11000 Prosperity Farms Road, Suite 104
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
As to the County:
James V. Mudd
Collier County Manager
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
(Remainder of Page Left Intentionally Blank)
6
STR DOCUMENT VIEW
- -
Page 2 of}
Be
ii
OR: 380:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caulied this Agreement to bl
by thoir appropriate officials, as of the date fint above written.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION!
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
"
'.'
A tle$t;
~~,~ ~~
Assistant District S tary
B~:"'oq c;:,JUf...........
A VB MARlA STEWARDSHIP COMMl
DISTRICT A
By;~ca~f &gj
Chairman of the Board of Supervisor
ffici ency:
ATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF tEON
Acknowledged and e:xec.uud befo
lOt}}' day of May, 20?;5) by ~
~t..U. 'tr~
Notary Public
,~# ~.: 1
http://www.c1erk.coIlier.fl.us/WEBLINK/Doc View.asp?DocumentID= 17516&FolderID=1.., 6/21/2005
Agend~t" '. ); 0
~~5
II age 0
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" "
1:,.
::1:
"
"..
"
"
"
::...
::".
::>
,,-
Ii'"
"
"
:::u
::0
::>
no
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
- :1
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
' 0 "
\ 0 If
' "
. "
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::o:fi::::~:@:C1::::A:o:i:D-::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~:::::::::::::
DRllAND USE SUMMARY :t
I MIU r UNIYVlaITY, ICHOOLa DIUI .foe H
[IJ ....SIOa.rn... 2.1121 AC H
m MlUOUIIi 328 "0 OFF..srTE RLSA OE81GNATroNS ::
00 COIIWNrrvl'AClLrTY 211 AI:: 111M' ItLMlI"I.OWW"YlITEWAADaH'PAAI!A 11
....,. I WlUo 1",-&\ WATER It&TlrmON ARIA
~ W!'T'l.MOPftUlltVI 112AC ::
_ I MIA I i1tLM HAarr....T uewARD8HIP Aft..... II
~ 81~ II
m LAK. PARQ fTll AC [1] Rl.M OPEN JJ
- RC>>.OW........ U2AC II
-DRlIlOUNDAJI'Y <I,IIIIIAC
=-''"'::_-.-':.-'--:'~''''--
".
-
.
I
I
I
I
J
.....
HSA
o
.....
o
HSA
.
H8A
o
'SA
HSA
..
..
.
'SA
.....
o
.
H'"
tAikJ "A'
(/ 1,000 2,000
1.--
GRAPHIC SCALE
~I
_'IIoI~._~_.__
_-:.~:.~
,.....~
'X
/; ;mmf ~I I
MAP H
- ~PLAH
TOWN OF AVE MARlA
PREPARmlFOR, NEW TOWN IlEVELClPIlENT. LLLl'
-----.
Agendla.Co
April 26, 2005
Page 14 of 46
.
-
Table 21-1
Development Parameters
Pha.e Phase
Ona Su b Two Sub
Total Total
Measurement (2006- (2012 - Final
Land Use De.crlption Unlta 2011) 2018) Total
Re$identlal Dwelling Units 8,010 4,990 11,000
ASllI$ted Living Facilitle$ Bed$ 0 450 450
Retail, Entertainment, SelVice Square Feet 387,900 322,100 890,000
Profe$$ional Office (GeneraVMedical/Flnanclai, etc.) Square Feet 278,800 233,400 510,000
Clvic/Communlly/Mi$cellaneou$ (1) Square Feet 115,500 33,000 148,500
Medical Facilities Square Feet 15,000 20,000 35,000
Hotel Room$ 110 290 400
Univel'$lly Studenll; 3,150 2,850 8,000
K.12 Schools (Private and Public) (2) Studenll; 1,120 1,980 3,100
t)<~I~~ \' W'
,._------------~---~.... .---
WilstJnMillef'
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
8e
"i
July 23, 2004
DRI-2004-AR-6293
PROJECT #2004070044
DATE: 8/3/04
RAY BELLOWS
(COMPANION TO SRA-2003-AR-4578)
Mr. Dan Trescott
DRI Coordinator
Southwest Florida Regionai Planning Council
4980 Bayline Drive
. 4th Floor
North Fort Myers, FL 33917
Re: The Town of Ave Maria Application for Deveiopment Approval
Dear Mr. Trescott:
On behalf of New Town Development, LLLP, we are pleased to submit the Town of Ave Maria
Application for Development Approval. Twenty-three (23) copies of the document, and five (5) copies of
the Question 21, Transportation Appendices are being delivered to you, along with a check in the
amount of $20,000, as required. Included in each binder is a CD which contains electronic versions of
Maps A-J, the transportation simulation modeling and intersection analysis files, and the text of the
responses to the ADA questions. A fee agreement form is also included.
By copy of this letter, fifteen (15) copies of the ADA, five (5) copies of the Transportation Appendices,
and a check in the amount of $134,875 are being delivered today to Mr. Ray Bellows, Collier County
Chief Planner.
Please provide copies of all reviewing agency comments and hearing schedules on the Town of Ave
Maria to both myself and George Varnadoe of Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson, and Johnson, as we are co-
agents for this project.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Wilson Miller, Inc.
!a1::~~t7-
President & CEO
cc: Ray Bellows
Blake Gable
George Varnadoe
RECEIVED
JUL 2 3 ?OO"
Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336
NaplesICorporate Office 3200 Ba1ley Lane. Suite 200' Naples. Florida 34105' 239.649..4040' Fax 239..643.5716
wilsonml/ler.com
"/21/2004-140316 Ver01'-MPERRY
M4J
13788-013.QOO-PDRI.28423
WilsonMiller.IIlC_ -- FL Lie.' LC.COOOI70
8e
I
~
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
4980 Haylinc Drive, -4th Floor, N.FL l\Iycrs, FL ;~8917-~)909 (2:39) 656-7720
PO. Box ;)i.55, 1\:. 1"1. Myers, FL :3Cl'J1S.;H55 Sl '"COM 749.7720
FAX (2;39) 65()-772Ji
July 23, 2004
RECEIVED
JUl 2 6 200~
Mr. Ray Bellows
Collier County Planning Services
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
RE: DRl "The Town of Ava Maria"
ORI-2004-AR-6293
PROJECT #2004070044
DATE: 8/3/04
RAY BELLOWS
(COMPANION TO SRA-2003-AR-4578)
Dear Mr. Bellows:
The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council has received a DRl Application for Development
Approval (ADA) for "The Town of Ava Maria" in Collier County. We are currently reviewing this
application to determine if the information provided is adequate to evaluate the local and regional impacts
of the project.
The applicant has indicated that you have received the appropriate number of copies of the ADA. ti your
staff has any questions regarding the adequacy of the information necessary for their own review, we will
be glad to request the applicant provide the information. We need these questions in writing no later than
August 18, 2004.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
sy;;:;;;:r::rNmG COUNm
DanielL. Trescott
PrincIpal Planner/DRI Coordinator
DLT/db
Enclosure
Cc: Blake Gable, New Town Development, LLLP
George 1. Varnadoe, Esq., Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson
Alan Reynolds, WilsonMi1Ier, Inc.
~hillk;dci
\;tI FIc:r:;ycii~rJ 'Pdpel
--'--_.~-~-'-'-
THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380,06, FLORIDA STATUTES
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
712312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,,~
Q3786-013-QOO.PORI-28423
8e
t
.
RPM-BSP-ADA-1
Seclion(s)
Question Number
PART I.
1
2,3
4,5,6,7
8
PART II,
9
10
11
PART III,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PART IV,
21
22
23
7/23/2004- 135516 v~ 01!- MPERRY
-
03786-01J..OOCI-PDRI-26423
'""' I,
bG !
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subiect
Paoe Number
Application Information
Statement of Intent
Application Information
Development Information
Permit Information
1
2
5
8-1
General Section
Maps
General Projecl Description
Revenue Generation Summary
9-1
10-1
11-1
Environmental Resources Impacts
Vegetation and Wildlife
Wetlands
Water
Soils
Floodplains
Water Supply
Wastewater Management
Stormwater Management
Solid Waste/Hazardous Waste/Medical Waste
12-1
13-1
14-1
15-1
16-1
17-1
18-1
19-1
20-1
Transportation Resource Impacts
Transportation Considerations 21-1
Air- Exempt per pre-application meeting on May 19, 2004
Hurricane Preparedness - Exempt per pre-application meeting on May 19, 2004
ii
Be .~
Section(s) Subiect Paqe Number
PART V, Human Resource Impacts
24 Housing 24-1
25 Police and Fire Protection 25-1
26 Recreation and Open Space 26-1
27 Education 27-1
28 Health Care 28-1
29 Energy 29-1
30 Historical and Archaeological Sites 30-1
PART VI. Specific DRllnformation
38 Schools 38-1
7/2312004- 135516 Ver. 01!. '"'PERRY
-,
03786-013-{l(ll).PDRI-28423
iii
Be
t
LIST OF TABLES
Table/Description
Paqe Number
10.1.B-1/Existing Land Use Descriptions ............................................................,................... 10-4
10.1.B-2/Proposed Land Uses ................................................................................................ 10-5
1 0.3.A-1 /Demographic Information....................................................................................... 10-10
1 0.3.A-2/Employment Wage Distribution ...................,.......................................................... 10-11
1 0.4.B-1 /Public Facility Impacts......................................................................................,...... 10-14
11.1.1/Fiscallmpact Detail............................................................................,......................... 11-3
11.2.1/Development Scenario Assumptions............................................................................ 11-4
11.2.2/Taxable Property Values ..................................,........................................................... 11-4
11.2.3/Sales Tax Calculation ............................,.....................................,......,......................... 11-5
11.2.4/Fiscallmpact Assumptions.................................................,.........................................11-6
11.2.5/Collier County Budget FY 2002........................,..................,..............,......................... 11-7
11.2.6/1mpact Fee Rates ....................................................,....,............................................. 11-10
11.2.7/lmpact Fee Revenue ................................,.......................................................,......... 11-11
12.A-1/Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Use Descriptions ..................................... 12-3
12.B-1/Listed Species Survey Details.................................................................................... 12-11
12.C-1/Listed Plant Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary .................. 12-14
12.C-2/Listed Wildlife Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary............... 12-14
12.C-3/Listed Wildlife Species that Could Potentially Occur On Site
But Were Not Observed ..................................................................,.............12-15
13.A-1/SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland Acreages................,..............................,................... 13-2
14A-1/Geologist's Log of MC-5001 ....,............,................................................................,.... 14-19
14A-2/Geologist's Log of MC-5075 .......................................................................................14-32
14A-3/Soil Boring of Well B-327 ............................................................................................ 14-35
14B-1/Water Quality of Selected Existing Production Wells ................................................. 14-37
14B-2/Well 2 Sampling Results............................................................................................. 14-38
15.A-1/Soil Descriptions and Interpretations ...........................................................................15-1
17.A-1/Potable/Non-Potable Water Demand ....................................,..................................... 17-1
17.A-2/Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands .....................................................17-2
17.A-3/Estimated Irrigated Acreage ........................................................................................ 17-2
17.C-1/Existing Wells at Proposed Ave Maria DRI...............................,.................................. 17-7
18.A-1/Projected Wastewater Generation By Phase .............................................................. 18-1
19.C-1/Drainage Areas................................................................,............ ............................... 19-2
19-4/Stage/Storage .............................................................................................,................... 19-4
20.A-1/Estimated Solid Waste Generation..............................................................................20-2
20.A-2/Anticipated Benefits of the Recycling Program............................................................ 20-2
21-1/Development Parameters......................................................................,......................... 21-2
21-2/1ntersections Analyzed.................,....................... ..,.........................,.............................. 21-4
21-3/Existing Roadway Conditions (Published Service Volumes)........................................... 21-6
21-4/Existing Roadway Conditions (Unpublished Service Volumes)....................................... 21-7
21-5/lntersection Capacity Analysis, Existing 2004 Traffic Conditions,
PM Peak Hour/Peak Season........................................................................... 21-8
21-6/Committed Roadway Improvements ...............................................................................21-9
21-7/Development Parameters.............................................................................................. 21-10
21-8iTrip Generation Phase 1 (2011 ).................................................................................... 21-11
21-9iTrip Generation Buildout (2016) .................................................................................... 21-12
712312004-135516 V",rcOl!.MPERRY
c_,
03786--013_()()()-PDRI.28423
iv
Ou .
LIST OF TABLES, (continued)
Table/Description
Paoe Number
21-10/Trip Generation Comparison, Net New External Daily Trips ....................................... 21-13
21-11/lnternal/External Split - Vehicle Trips.......................................................................... 21-17
21-12/Phase 1 (2011) Future Conditions Without Project..................................................... 21-19
21-13/Buildout (2016) Future Conditions Without Project .....................................................21-20
21-14/Phase 1 (2011) Future Conditions With Project..........................................,............,.. 21-21
21-15/Buildout (2016) Future Conditions With Project.......................................................... 21-22
21-16/Phase 1 (2011) Intersection Capacity Analysis ......................,............,.......................21-23
21-17/Buildout (2016) Intersection Capacity Analysis ............,.............................................. 21-24
21-18/Phase 1 (2011) Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements,................................... 21-26
21-19/Buildout (2016) Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements ..,................................. 21-26
21-20/Phase 1 (2011) Recommended Intersection Improvements....................................... 21-28
21-21/Buildout (2016) Recommended Intersection Improvements ....................................... 21-29
21-22/Entrance Roads Daily and Peak Hour Peak Direction Volumes ..............,.................. 21-32
24.A-1/Dwelling Units Within the Community .......................................................................... 24-1
24.A-2/Target Market .............................................................................................................. 24-2
27.A-1/School Age Children By Level.............................,........................................................ 27-1
28.A-1/Project Demand for Health Care Facilities........................,....................,........,............ 28-1
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- UPERRY
~"'
03786-013-()OO.PORt.28423
v
8e I
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit/Description
Paae Number
21-1/Study Area...................... ................................................................................................. 21-3
21-2/lnternal Trip Capture - Phase 1 (2011)......,...................................................................21-15
21-3/lnternal Trip Capture - Buildout (2016) ......,....,.............................................................21-16
712312llQ4-- 135516 Ver: 01!. MPERRY
~
03786-013-0Q0-PDRJ.-26423
vi
8 c ,11
LIST OF FIGURES
FiQure/Descriotion
PaQe Number
14A-1/Topography of Northem Collier County ............................,.........................................14-13
14A-21Generalized Hydrogeology Beneath Collier County.................................................... 14-14
14A-3/Transmissivity in the Water Table Aquifer .................................................................. 14-15
14A-4/Thickness of the Tamiami Confining Layer......,......................................................,... 14-16
14A-5/Transmissivity in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer ............................................................. 14-17
14A-6/Transmissivity in the Sandstone Aquifer..................................................................... 14-18
17C-1/Map Showing Locations of Existing Agricultural Production Wells .............................17-12
712312004- 135516 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~.,
037Bl>-O\3-<JOO.-PDRI.2M23
vii
8 c '~1
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
AttachmenUDescription
Paoe Number
4-1/Disclosure of Interest....................,........................................................................,................ 6
4-2/Consent and Appointment of Agent .......................................................................................7
4-3/0ther Lands Owned Within Y, Mile Radius ....,..................................................................... 11
5-1/Legal Description............................................................................................. ..................... 14
17.E-1/Letter from Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP ............................................................ 17-13
20.C-1/Letter from Linda Collins of Immokalee Disposal Company........................................ 20-5
25.B-1/Letter to Jeff Page, Collier County EMS ...................................................................... 25-3
25.B-2/Letter to Immokalee Fire Control District ........................................,............................25-4
25.B-3/Letter to Sheriff Don Hunter, Collier County Sheriff ......................................,.............. 25-5
27,C-1/Letter to Dave Lesansky, Collier County Public Schools ............................................. 27-2
28.A-1/Letter from Edward Morton, CEO, NCH Healthcare System ....................................... 28-2
30-1/Letter from Janet Matthews to Ross Morton ............................................,............,......... 30-3
30-21Letter from Frederick Gaske to Marion Almy .................................................................. 30-5
30-3/Letter from Frederick Gaske to David Genson................................................................ 30-6
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~
0371l6-013-000-PDRI-28423
viii
Be
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 21-1
Transportation Methodology and Supplement Pre-Application Document
dated May 25,2004
Appendix 21-2
Transportation Detailed Intersection Capacity Analyses and Traffic County
Data Using SYNCHRO Version 6 Software
Note: Due to the size of the documentation, transportation appendices are not included
herein, Separate copies have been provided to the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council and Collier County,
712312()()4..135516 Vef".Oll-,.lPERRY
,-
03186-013-000-PORI-28423
ix
'~I
-
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive - Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
8e
RPM-BSP-ADA-1
,
j
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380,06, FLORIDA STATUTES
PART I, Application Information.
1. I, Blake Gable , the undersigned owner/authorized agent of New Town
Development. LLLP ,hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regionallmpacl
as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Chapter 28-24, Florida
Administrative Code (FAC.). In support thereof I submit the following information
concerning The Town of Ave Maria ,which information is true and correct to the best
1../
of my knowledge.
ignature of 0 er or
Authorized Agent
7/23J2QO.t- 135516 Vf!!r: 011- MPERRY
~,
037B6-013_000-PDRI_28423
1
~ Be :~I
2, Owner/Developer (name, address, phone), State whether or not the owner or
developer is authorized to do business in the State of Florida pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 607, F,S,
New Town Development, LLLP
2600 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, FL 34105
New Town Development is a Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership and is authorized
to do business pursuant to Chapter 607. F.S,
3, Authorized Agent and Consultants (name, address, phone),
Leqal Counsel (Authorized Aqent)
George L. Varnadoe, Esq.
Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson
821 Fifth Avenue South
Suite 201
Naples, Florida 34102
Telephone: 239-261-9300
Fax: 239-261-9782
E-mail: qlvarnadoe@naDleslaw.com
Land Use Planninq and Community Resources
Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, Chairman and CEO
Margaret Perry, AICP
Anita Jenkins, AICP
Sharon Jenkins-Owen, AICP
Steve Beyer, ASLA
Wilson Miller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: alrevnolds@wilsonmiller.com
marqaretDerrv@wilsonmiller.com
anitaienkins@wilsonmiller,com
siowen@wilsonmiller.com
stevebever@wilsonmiller.com
7/23f2004.- 135516 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
~
037ll6-01:J..OOO-PDRI-28423
2
. Be
.' f
.
1
Environmental Resources
Timothy P. Durham, P.E,
Bruce K. Johnson, PhD
Wilson Miller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: timdurham@wilsonmiller.com
bruceiohnson@wilsonmiller.com
Enaineerina, Potable Water, Waste Water, Stormwater
John English, P.E.
Craig Pajer, P.E.
WilsonMiller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: iohnenalish@wilsonmiller.com
craiapaier@wilsonmiller.com
Enaineerina, Water
Kirk Martin, P.E.
Gordon Kennedy, P.E.
COM Missimer
9311 College Parkway, Suite 1
Fort Myers, FL 33919
Telephone: 239-432-9494
Fax: 239-432-9453
E-mail: martinwk@cdm.com
kennedvap@cdm.com
Transportation
Jeffory Perry, AICP
Gavin Jones, P.E" AICP
Wilson Miller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: ieffperrv@wilsonmiller.com
aaviniones@wilsonmiller.com
7123/2~ 135516 v~: OH- MPERRY
,,-
00786-013_0CJ0.PDRI_28423
3
Demoqraohic and Economic
Hank Fishkind, PhD
Stan Geberer
Fishkind and Associates, Inc.
11869 High Tech Terrace
Orlando, FL 32817
Telephone: 407-382-3256
Fax: 407-382-3254
E-mail: hankfailfishkind.com
stanqailfishkind.com
Archaeoloqist
Jodi Pracht
Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A
Sarasota, FL 34240
Telephone: 941-379-6206
Fax: 941-379-6216
7/23/2004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
-
03786-013-QOO-PDRI-28423
~ 8 C
4
~,
.~
'ac
~-
4, Attach a notarized authorization from all persons or corporations (or authorized
agents of said persons or corporations) having fee simple or lessor estate in the
site indicating that each of these parties is aware of, and concurs with, the
development of this property as described in this Application for Development
Approval, Include the names and addresses of all parties with an interest in the
property, In addition, include descriptions of any other properties within one-half
mile radius of the DRI site in which any of the parties with an interest in the DRI site
hold a fee simple or lessor interest.
The 4995 acres that comprise the Town of Ave Maria are currently owned by the Barron
Collier Partnership, a Florida general partnership, and Barron Collier Investments, Ltd., a
Florida limited partnership. Attachment 4-1 lists all of the partners in the two partnerships
that currently own all of the property within Ave Maria. Ave Maria University will ultimately
own and develop the approximately 950 acres that will constitute the university. New
Town Development, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership will be the developer
of Ave Maria, with the exception of the university.
Attachment 4-2 is a notarized Consent demonstrating the authorization of the Barron
Collier Partnership and Barron Collier Investments, Ltd., to the filing of this ADA and the
development of the Town of Ave Maria. Also included in response to this question
(Attachment 4-3) are legal descriptions of the other properties owned by either the
partnership or the individual partners of the Barron Collier Partnership and Barron Collier
Investments, Ltd., which are within one-half mile radius of the site.
5, Attach a legal description of the development site, Include section, township and
range,
Attachment 5-1 is the legal description of the development site.
6, Have you requested a binding letter of interpretation of DRI status or vested rights,
clearance letter, agreement or preliminary development agreement from the
Department of Community Affairs? If so, what is the current status of this
determination?
New Town Development, LLLP, Barron Collier Investments, Ltd., Barron Collier
Partnership, and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs entered into a
preliminary development agreement (PDA) on March 17, 2004; recorded in Official
Records of Collier County, Florida; OR Book 3533, Pages 2482-2488 on April 2, 2004,
7, List all local governments with jurisdiction over the proposed development.
Collier County
Ave Maria Stewardship Community District
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~.,
031ll6-013-QOO.PORI-28423
5
ATTACHMENT 4-1
Disclosure of Interest
rBe
~.~
~
New Town Development, LLLP--A Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership--
Owned by:
General Partner: Nua Baile, LLC ("NBLLC") .05%
Limited Partner: Thomas S, Monaqhan Irrevocable Grantor Trust of 2003
("TSMIGT") 49.95%
General Partner: Barron Collier Corporation .05%
Limited Partner: BCAM, LLLP 49.95%
Nua Baile, LLC--A Florida Limited Liabilitv Companv--Is a single member LLC that is owned by
Thomas S. Monaqhan Irrevocable Grantor Trust of 2003 ("TSMIGT"). TSMIGT
is a grantor trust created by Mr. Monaghan, and the discretionary beneficiaries are Thomas S.
Monaghan, Ave Maria University, and any charitable affiliate of Ave Maria University.
BCAM. LLLP--A Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership..-Owned by:
Limited Partner: Barron Collier Partnership
General Partner: Barron Collier Corporation
Barron Collier Corporation--A Florida S Corporation--Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul, Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan,
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier, Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/kla Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Partnership--A Florida General Partnership--Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul, Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan.
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier, Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/kla Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Investments. Ltd, - A Florida Limited Partnership - Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul, Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan,
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier, Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/kla Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Corporation--Officers:
President--Paul J. Marinelli
Vice President--David K. Borden
Secretary-Treasurer-Bradley A. Boaz
6
99.90%
.10%
25.00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
25,00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
25.00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
, Be
'''',1
Attachment 4-2
CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
This Consent and Appointment of Agent is made this ~ day JC.,~ ' 2004,
by Barron Collier Partnership, a Florida general partnership, and Barron Collie~ Investments,
Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Owner") which have a
mailing address of 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Florida 34105.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Barron Collier Partnership and Barron Collier Investments, Ltd., own
approximately 4,995 acres of undeveloped land (hereinafter referred to as the "Properly")
located in Collier County, Florida, which land is more particularly described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, OWner intends to carry out development on the Properly that will require the
filing of an Application for Development Approval (ADA) with Collier County and other agencies
or govemmental entities to develop the Properly as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, Owner plans to develop the Properly as a DRI, to be known as the Town of
Ave Maria, which will require the designation of the Properly as a Stewardship Receiving Area
by Collier County, and will also require approvals or actions by other governmental entities or
agencies of the State of Florida, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and agencies of Collier
County; and
WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of acknowledging of OWner consent to the development
of the Properly and appointment of agents to represent it in preparing applications and in
obtaining any and all governmental approvals necessary to develop the Properly in the manner
intended by the OWner and to authorize said agents to act on the Owner's behalf with full
authority to obtain all such approvals, including a DRI development order and the designation of
the Properly as described in Exhibit A as a Stewardship Receiving Area, and to represent the
Owner in all dealings, negotiations, and hearings necessary to effectuate the development plan
for the Properly.
NOW, THEREFORE, OWner, in order to acknowledge its consent to develop the
Properly as a DRI and to authorize and direct its agents and representatives to act on its behalf
to apply for and obtain necessary governmental and agency approvals for the designation and
development of the Properly, hereby authorizes and directs the following:
APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
1. Owner hereby appoints George L. Varnadoe of the law firm of Cheffy,
Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson, whose address is 821 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 201, Naples,
Florida 34102, and Alan D. Reynolds of WilsonMiller, Inc., whose address is 3200 Bailey Lane,
Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34105, as the authorized and duly designated agents/representatives
of OWner, with full authority to act on OWner's behalf to perform all legal services and planning
services, respectively, related to the preparation, submission and review of any applications
needed to obtain approval and implementation of OWner's ADA and Stewardship Receiving
Area for the Properly.
7
. Be
~I
.,
2. George L. Varnadoe of the law firm of Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson
and Alan Reynolds of WilsonMiller, Inc., are authorized to act as agents for Owner, with full
authority of Owner, before any and all governmental bodies, including any agencies of the local,
state and federal governments as may be appropriate and reasonably related to obtaining
approval of proposed development on the Properly, including obtaining a DRI development
order and Stewardship Receiving Area designation on the Properly. The agencies or entities
before whom the agents are authorized to represent Owner's interests may include, but shall
not be limited to the following:
a. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners and all departments, divisions and
sub-units of Collier County.
b. The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
c. The Florida Secretary of State and aU other Cabinet-level offices and agencies.
d. The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council.
e. The Florida Departments of Community Affairs, Environmental Protection and
Transportation.
f. The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.
g. The South Florida Water Management District.
h. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
AS EVIDENCE OF ITS CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS named above,
the Owner, by and through its duly authorized representative, has signed this consent and
appointment below.
~0;!; {j. 0fa.v-
Signature /
(A-Ml.YIV' ,4. SHAw'
Printed Name
OWNER:
\.'1(~ (){ ~. blWA--
Signature
TIZ1Si+1\ A. NEe;:,
Printed Name
R
s(d~ aA~
c.4-i<Jl..yAl A-- 's!f#J
Printed Name
~~.~cr
Signature
Il2. IS 1-\ A A.. ~Lf3r;?S
Printed Name
STATE OF FL
COUNTY OF6}L-ll8G-
1f..-
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this .;;l.() day of
'JU 1..'-1 ,2004 by PAUL J. MARINELLI, as Administrative Agent for BARRON
COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, a Florida General p<irtnershiPiiM ..fl
JYJ cl'l, fMt;M
\\\111"" Susan L Maturo
~m").ill"" ',\(]o<<nnI"'~;CC967157 Notary Public
~.;,! 'E !IjU1lI Oct. 15,2004 Name: s.v~4,J L. fI1A-ruRAJ
;~ ~$ Dodd nu. C rt'fi t N
"~Off\':tio<' AIIantit Bonding Co., 1Dt. e I lea eo.
'''n'-- My Commission Expires:
By:
~ Be
~#c~~a.-M.
Lamar Gable
A General Partner
."
..
....,
STATE OF }1 ~
COUNTY OF C!..oI..I-..I Ff,--
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this :l{y'lt. day of
.:J7J L ~ ' 2004 by Lamar Gable, a General Partner of BARRON COLLIER
PARTNE SHIP, a Florida General Partnership.
J~rt~
Notary Public
Name: s;.u~A1J L. fhf!1iJ?O
Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
:\,\\l~IU",1. Suaan L. Maturo
~~,,;'P ~ ~............... CC 967157
:. .: ~ Oct. 15,2004
:~ = ]lodIod '\'bn.
.,,"'A;l ~ ,,_ ,.~
'h~O,t AIIantit IloodIoi ~., -
....'l'.'\:
q
Be
~1
Wc:;:aAi~
Signature A. . ,. )
~OI-pAJ (t.SfT'W'
Printed Name
OWNER:
"'- 0u~ 1.1~j ~
Signature
Jl7jSM ~. ~~e::::,
Pri~ Name
(!~ j.A1~
Signature J A . J
e.,q.<o",y It' S:1f"fv'
Printed Name
'0U~ -h. /:J(I\/
Signature
JeiSl-\-f:>.-. p,.... ~JL8i'S
Printed Name
STATE OF fL
COUNTY OF Cnt-f-./OC-
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this d-IJ f(day of
::JU Lt. 2004 by PAUL J. MARINELLI, as Administrative Agent for BARRON
COLLIE INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership. f).
~,~V~:J"" SWlIl.Il 1. Maturo ~ rJl. ~
;;m';.p.-M........'OC96ll~ P ~
;0.\ . 11 BqWI Oat. IS, 2004 Notary b , ,,~I L Ih A P if,
-:;'{JOfl'~,f _ "'" Name: >tf7V' Tv r--u
'I>n'" - Bc-, ~. IDL Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
ER INVESTMENTS D.
ship
By:
~~
Lamar Gable
A General Partner
STATE OF
FL
COUNTY OF (/')LL I t:l2-
The fO~Oing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this d.() *- day of
<... VI- '-/ , 2004 by Lamar Gable. a General Partner of BARRON COLLIER
INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership.
~*.(l~
Notary Public L,A, ~ Lh.
Name: SUSA-tJ .,,, 4 'Uf-{J
Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
\\\PIII,,, S.usan L. Maturo
\'~o.'( p" I,
"'~~-.fl;;~ "_--,__,-\l67lSl
~;;,.;;:"~""uw- .....
,".' ,..= EJpir<lB Oat. tS,2Ol4
'~~;.... .'~$ DraW ftN
'''',f,OF'P~~'''' AlIantic ~ r.., IaL
" 1111"
1()
r Be
ATTACHMENT 4-3
OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURES
WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF THE DRI BOUNDARY
WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
The following map with folio numbers is cross-referenced to ownership disclosure and
legal descriptions found in the attached table. The ownership disclosures are within \12
mile of the Town of Ave Maria. The applicant and partners with the applicant are listed
as Barron Collier Investments Ltd (including Collier, Margurite R.), Barron Collier -
Partnership, Peninsula Improvement Corporation, Silver Strand III Partnership, Pacific
Collier Partnership (including Immokalee Vegetable Growers), and Noblis Collier.
11
411II.'..
, .
,
.
-
-I ~o
~ ~
r
Z
0 0
"T1
~ 0 0
c.n
m r
:s:: III
0 ...... is 0 CO
> :IE J/ ~ III
;u il ;: .. :::J
> :::J if 0 ~
III IE c
(jl :ll ~
0-
~ ..
::T C- o<!
'0' N ..
:IE ~
;:::;:
::T CD
S' Ul
~
-
'"
~ ~
III ~
0 r
..... I '"
0 W m
;U ~
12
z
o
;:
..
0:
u
III
W
o
-'
..
"
w
-'
:;: ~ :;:
(f) ~ (f)
u.~W LL
Q..-u. 0
~C)O ~
....a...N .....
:;:0;0 :;:
a: (/)~g3:" ~; m (/J
o :::t..- "<t C> C9 '" :::t-
O "'-0::;:; a... a... N W
~ ~O~ 0 0 C9 (/)
0:: u..r::u. ~ ~ ~ LL
o O.....O"<t O:l 0
Cf) ""'(9"<1";:' 0:: 0:: co :::t
Cf) ;:CL;::~ 0 0 Z
~ ~g~~ t t ~ ~
r:: LLS!?U.O 'V "<t Z U.
.... Oo::O..;t C> C) u.. 0
(9 ~O~;::: ~ a.. 0 ~
g 5g~~ m lB ~ ~5
0> __.......,fLL U W;:'
.....vWC);:::a o::~o:: 3: (l)W
a::--Za...W~ 0....0 Z ~Z
O~u..gZz r--:U:,..: I--.:tLL
Cl)zOmLL .:::t~:::t~ <(__0
(J) ""'.....0""'..... ...... .....
~~;::~~;:~a:3:a: "ow::t
COv~a::Lu>'''OZO ~o::~~
lO.... OZZU.O(()LL.(O (/}~O"
....:;:L1..Z U. lOQIJ") (/)<(......
(9~O-~O:::t""'V"'" WuJ~O
3: a...u.:::tUV:::t.....o::;::a:: ~~""':::t
a:: oO.....~--.....~050 "",a... 3:"'"
Ow......> hen' --:E W
(/) O>N(/)03:>U.O 0 ~<(O(/J
(/) .....;:::..t~(/Jzoa::u.a:: >uZ..,f5
w O::.~;::u .(I){'\jU)OCl) z <(:;:.:0::
~ O:::tww:::t(/);::~~< u.~:::twoo
uu:::t (f.).....Z(/)w~zw.....w mow.....zoo
<(<(~ ID5U.U.Z(O..t~Z~ ~I-~Wu.~
O~(/J ~ZOOu.'<t;:::a...~a... C)~ 20v
N", -u..vzoco>~.....::ii: n 1O~U-""-
lO U. 3: -- 0::><( <(...... 0-.....
550~~~W~~(/J(/JU~U RZ owW
rot -za::.....OOLL.(f) (/J m(/)(/)<(ZOO
lli~g~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~bd
....J V """NI-.......... __ - - ->-NN
~~N~j;:::;:::<(5j5j""'jjjjj....J;:::;:':
....J<(5.....<(5Z~Z<(Z<(5<(<(<(<(<(WZW
<(com(/JmOOml-mmmmZmmcommcomoo
OONNmNmNmNNNNmNNNNNNNN
NOOOONOON~N~~~~N~~~~OOOO~OO
OOvvOOvOOvOOvvvvOOVVVVVVVV
VNooVooVoVomm~V~~WOOWMOM
~~~W~~M~MNNN~NMMN~~M~
:;:
(f)
(f)
W
~
N
'"
j 8 e
.""!f
,II
..
M
.-i
00 0000 0 0 00
~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~
oow~~oooow~~~~~~~~~~~ww~
~~I~~~~II~I~I~I~II~~I
ww~wwwwoo~w~~~~~w~~www
~~~~~~~~~~~w~w~~~~~~~
~~w~~~~wW~WzWzW~ww~~w
oowZ~oooowzzooz~z~zwzZooooz
~ww~wwww~~w~~~~~w~~ww~
w>>~>>>>~~>~<~<~>~~>>~
Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~o~~~~~~~~~~~=~=~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~o~o~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~z~z~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~<~<~~~~~~~
ooooooooooo~o~ooooooo
uuuuuuuuuuu~u~uuuuuuu
zzzzzzzzzzzOOzOOzzzzzzz
ooooooooooo~o~ooooooo
~~~~~~~~~oc~~~~~~ococ~~oc
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
O~~M~Nom~oo~~w~mMWMWOM
000000000000000000000
OONOOOO~~O~ONoooaa~aN
zOoooooooooooooooooooo
~~~~~~~oo~~vv~o~~~~g~oo~
~NN~W~W~WOO~~OO~OOOO~OO~N~N
NNNNNNMNMMMMNMM~MNNMN
NNNNNN~N~~~~N~~~~NN~N
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
z
o
t~~~m~~g~grere~~~M~o~~g~
w
'"
w
~oooommmmmmmmmmmmmooomoomoo
~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNN
..
;:
~oooooooooooo~oo~~~~oo~~~ooooo~oo
~vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv
o
...
Attachment ~-1~(:
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WilslinMiller$
p
New Directions In PlaMing, Design & Engineering
"1
..
J
ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH,
RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICUlARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16:
THENCE NORTH 01"04'10" WEST SO.OO FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OIL WELL
ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN
DESCRIBED:
THENCE SOUTH 88"57'06" WEST 152.15 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 01"07'23" WEST 300.01 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 300 FEET NORTH OF
AN PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID OIL WELL ROAD:
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88"57'05" WEST 2,417.56 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88"55'37" WEST 1,128,15 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 01"13'46" WEST 1,089.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"32'56" WEST 1,514.02 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 89"24'19" WEST 3977.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"01'40" EAST 1280.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" EAST 1125.68 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 00"19'38" WEST 520.46 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 09"27'56" EAST 38.31 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 14"56'15" EAST 32.59 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 59"02'49" EAST 24.49 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 68"12'25" EAST 33.93 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 73"08'54" EAST 72.42 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 69"14'09" EAST 65.14 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 61"11'58" EAST 47,93 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 56"44'10" EAST 80.38 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 54"18'17" EAST 82.75 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 51"34'19" EAST 552.31 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 12"32'03" EAST 52.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"41'34" WEST 780.99 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 38"40'18" WEST 48.27 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 55"58'45" WEST 175.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"14'12" WEST 46.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86"41'17" WEST 358.77 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 43"16'35" WEST 44.00 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 01"28'53" WEST 584.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88"45'30" EAST 2,256.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"31'40" WEST 679.82 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 29"57'19" EAST 43.24 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 80"03'11" EAST 750.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82"05'14" EAST 23.32 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 08"45'48" WEST 831.15 FEET:
THENCE 82.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 128.55 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36"53'11" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 23"30'23" EAST 81,34 FEET TO A POINT
OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE 149,95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE WEST, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 215.80 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39"48'43" SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS NORTH 22"02'37" EAST 146.95 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 02"08'16" EAST 434,86 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 38"40'13" EAST 124.61 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 23"55'58" EAST 503.82 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 89"19'06" EAST 272.53 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 81"10'42" EAST 718.98 FEET:
Off/CBS slraleglcally localed /0 serve our cl/enls 800.649.4336
NaplesJCorporale Office 3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200' Naples. Florida 34105 . 239649.4040 . Fax 239.643.5716
Page I oft 0
3ISr.ZOO4-12723O v..... 011. 8STOCKI-lAM wllsonmil/er. com
-
"""""""'.,
WilsonMillftf,lnc_ -,t ~c_, lc-ca00170
WilslinMillei
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
f Be
""'1
' .
">:.1.'
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT 'N - D.RI. llANOS (CONTINUED);
THENCE NORTH 09"56'39" EAST 638.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"36'58" EAST 172.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10"53'22" EAST 171,73 FEET;
THENCE 327,51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTiAl CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 27S.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 68"07'37" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 39"53'3S" WEST 308,56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"57'24" WEST 492.85 FEET;
THENCE 313.21 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 331.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 64"OS'52" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 90"00'00" WEST 301,71 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62"57'04" WEST 506.32 FEET;
THENCE 155.39 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTiAl CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 107.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83"01'31" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27"09'30" WEST 142,15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14"21'16" EAST 287.88 FEET;
THENCE 341,14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 168.89 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 115"44'01"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29"11'23" WEST 286.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"03'24" WEST 81.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 19"06'00" WEST 178.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"34'35" WEST 263.81 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 33"42'00" WEST 81,86 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 51"52'05" WEST 1,402.28 FEET;
THENCE 219.21 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAl CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 151.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 82"64'07" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 22"50'28" WEST 200,58 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 18"36'35" EAST 1,047.10 FEET;
THENCE 196.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 66"04'00" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 48"32'34" EAST 186.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81"34'34" EAST 177.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14'02'28' EAST 106.97 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 15'53'24" WEST 33.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 72'18'08" WEST 341325.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"22'40" WEST 868.64 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"02'21" WEST 1,001.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15"43'23" WEST 808,63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"29'42" WEST 215.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02"51'21" WEST 51.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37"59'19" EAST 51,77 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 58"24'39" EAST 660.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56"56'2S" EAST 865.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 62"27'21" EAST 303.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"11'43" EAST 148.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"27'20" EAST 99.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79"59'44" EAST 60.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18"39'40" EAST 212.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13"26'09" EAST 80.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04"05'14" EAST 65.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"47'28" EAST 593.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05'29'40" EAST61.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20'17'22" EAST 57.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 51 "55'17" EAST 55.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84"48'27" EAST 51.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 67"53'53" EAST 40.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 53"37'33" EAST 55.29 FEET;
Page 20fl0
15
3ISI2OO4-t2123O Vr.01f..8STClCf<I-IAt.l
-
0378lS-<<1O<<lD-_o
WilstinMillei
y
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
~I
r:.
.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.I. UANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE SOUTH 55"37'37" EAST 158,19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66"28'32" EAST 79.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81"19'48" EAST 69,92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80"53'08" EAST 96.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83"09'35" EAST 88.49 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75"58'08" EAST 57.96 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45"44'09" EAST 65.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 23"12'23" EAST 107,03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 31"09'29" EAST 124,53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 36"28'03" EAST 195.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41"49'01" EAST 193.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41"27'57" EAST 187.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH SO"OO'28" EAST 177,12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"06'03" EAST 103.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82"07'11" EAST 76.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"49'02" EAST 61.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41"11'10" EAST 266.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"45'15" EAST 203.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 63"26'06" EAST 230.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 55"12'54" EAST 17.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06"58'17" WEST 40.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60"20'46" EAST 94.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"42'46" EAST 42.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"22'08" EAST 29,10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05"13'18" EAST 37.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 07"13'16" WEST 185.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"55'SO" WEST 66.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"35'26" WEST 70.11 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03"30'28" EAST 24,24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09"22'28" EAST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32"03'11" EAST 61.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41"59'52" EAST 54.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"38'59" EAST 44.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 40"19'34" EAST 80.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39"30'46" EAST 42.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"07'39" EAST 71,16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60"17'11" EAST 55,95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68"43'34" EAST 63.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"12'19" EAST 41.51 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75"32'58" EAST 74,98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"55'SO" EAST 42.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"31'07" EAST 36.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"37'20" EAST 34.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 72"08'39" EAST 57.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"52'SO" EAST 70.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"52'18" EAST 99.31 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70"35'59" EAST 56.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"12'15" EAST 70.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85"47'37" EAST 52.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64"20'23" EAST 9.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23"58'25" EAST 60.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39"27'42" EAST 136.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18"12'03" EAST 123.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"26'30" WEST 137.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"55'34" WEST 133.51 FEET;
Page 3 oliO
:ws.'2D04-127Z1O Ver;01I-BSTOCI<HAAl
-
""""","",.,
16
WilstinMiller'
r
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
'Be
~"~
.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.I. llANOS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 84'43'21' WEST 101.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87'06'S3" WEST 375.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86'31'5S" WEST 296.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02'29'11" WEST 25,06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"19'00" WEST 63.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87'01'35" WEST 57.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85'14'11" WEST 27.0S FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'11'09" WEST 22.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71'01'47" WEST 25,34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"57'44" WEST 25.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'42'24" WEST 41.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'00'19" WEST 49.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78'26'56" WEST 104.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78'45'16" WEST 195.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79'21'51" WEST 81.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'30'15" WEST 38.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70'33'36" WEST 13.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53'58'21" WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53'58'22' WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'09'08" WEST 16.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34'52'31" WEST 30,12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37'08'48" WEST 31.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 37,06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'28'45" WEST 29.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"29'45" WEST 40,59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53'28'16' WEST 25.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"51'49" WEST 23.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"53'50" WEST 40,74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74'38'02" WEST 101.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76"25'14" WEST 79.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'50'34" WEST 83.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"16'32" WEST 71.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70"44'15" WEST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"44'50" WEST 240,26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76"22'29" WEST 54,20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75'46'41" WEST 12.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"06'45" WEST 243.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"32'28" WEST 438.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86"36'21" WEST 1,109.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"00'11" WEST 142.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 17"30'03" WEST 10.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21"30'05" EAST 36.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 30"57'50" WEST 6.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"10'43" WEST 139.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11'46'06" WEST 25.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05'42'38" WEST 20.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04"23'55" WEST 13,47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50'11'40" WEST 8.Q7 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83'59'28" WEST 19.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'S7'27" WEST 35,25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83'49'48" WEST 38.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'44'23" WEST 96.27 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79"48'04" WEST 449.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'49'57" WEST 284 20 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 83'39'35" WEST 93,52 FEET; ,NTHENCE NORTH 87'39'46" WEST 101.30 FEET;
Page 4 oflO
:16'2004-127230 Vet:01!-BSTOOCI-W,t
-
--.
17
WilstinMille,"
New Directions tn ;'anning. Design & Engineering f 8 C ~ ,
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9,16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, flORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - DRI. L1ANDS (CONTINUEO):
1
THENCE NORTH 84'25'40" WEST 85.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'28'16" WEST 9522 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'23'45" WEST 170.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"57'50" WEST 76.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'26'38" WEST 35.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'46'31' WEST 41.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48'48'50" WEST 43,91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"14'43" WEST 134.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'58'24" WEST 611.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 338.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH <<'41'45" WEST 412,62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'26'06" WEST 267,38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46'27'29" WEST 200.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"02'14" EAST 12.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'52'12" EAST 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03"20'45" EAST 73.83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85'25'42" WEST 6.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" WEST 10.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70'27'48" WEST 16.99 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56'18'36" WEST 14.89 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75'57'49" WEST 17.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87'16'25" WEST 10.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"20'58" WEST 1621 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35'32'16" WEST 17,77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 26'33'54" WEST 17.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16'11'21" WEST 16,67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01'52'04" WEST 47,53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"05'16" WEST 336.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'29'38" WEST 299.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"58'29" WEST 220.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"52'19" EAST 237.57 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'46'52" WEST 113.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'00'00" EAST 13.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14'02'10" EAST 8.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45'00'00" EAST 5.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71'33'54" EAST 9,80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'24'19" EAST 15,63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89'12'02" EAST 222,07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86'36'31" EAST 69,83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82'38'52" EAST 32.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70'49'16" EAST 25.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60"38'32" EAST 18.96 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62'<<'41" EAST 38.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"08'30" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"42'34" EAST 25.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'18'31" EAST 32.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"58'54" EAST 43.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66'16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56'01'25" EAST 57.29 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52'34'43" EAST 171.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'53'54" EAST 75.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36'37'17" EAST 47.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35'48'12" EAST 77.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30"21'29" EAST 83.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 22"37'12" EAST 67.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13'36'02" EAST 32.94 FEET;
Page SoflO
18
3I5r.lOO4-1Z123O Ver.: 011- BSTOCKHAU
-
037as-ooo.ooo..t)
..
WilstinMille,"
r
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
r Be
~,
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNlY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT"N - 0.R.1. UANDS (CONTINUED);
THENCE NORTH 14"28'13" EAST 66.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10"57'15" EAST 65.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"18'36" EAST 21.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"41'58" EAST 10.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" EAST 1022 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"23'33" EAST 15.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64"39'14" EAST 21.71 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67"47'47" EAST 163,98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64"59'39" EAST 161.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"22'14" EAST 18.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"53'50" EAST 28,10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" EAST 14.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88"18'55" EAST 35,13 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 88'36'10" EAST 42.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" EAST 28.92 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82"45'47" EAST 16.40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 61"55'39" EAST 17.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"34'35" EAST 118.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"56'55" EAST 17.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"43'15" EAST 124.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13"46'19" WEST 328.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70"48'07" EAST 76,21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54"29'06" EAST 37.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 21"53'45" WEST 54.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70"47'14" EAST 77.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71 "02'31" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"16'21" EAST 131.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"04'43" EAST 126,98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"13'18" EAST 106.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71"11'17" EAST 74.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68"33'08" EAST 30.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71"33'54" EAST 17.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"15'14" EAST 13.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 83"05'20" EAST 17.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47"43'35" EAST 15.29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 37"20'58" EAST 24.58 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16"38'20" EAST 46.68 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 24"10'17" EAST 35.78 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21"52'45" EAST 70,36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34"33'45" EAST 28.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47"26'12" EAST 34.20 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52"25'53" EAST 8.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 "33'54" EAST 9,75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"01 '49" EAST 11.87 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"08'15" EAST 20.59 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88"25'50" EAST 37.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87"33'48" EAST 48.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"35'00" EAST 141.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89"06'34" EAST 99.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84"31'51" EAST 48.55 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 82"20'00" EAST 26.97 FEET~
THENCE NORTH 79"46'40" EAST 31.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76"27'51" EAST 28.56 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 70"23'45" EAST 39.84 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 70"48'11" EAST 134.46 FEEl-.
THENCE NORTH 70"37'19" EAST 79.02 FEET; ,
Page 6oflO
J6'2OO4..t2nJO v.:Oll.BSTOCl(H.t.M
-
"""""""'-.
19
WilstinMillei
.
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
">Ill.,...
~ ',.
"
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 ANO 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.I_ L1ANDS (CONTINUEO):
THENCE NORTH 66"32'28" EAST 29.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 57"49'44" EAST 37,66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53"21'57" EAST 74.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54"24'59" EAST 148.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50"50'35" EAST 203.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48"43'53" EAST 33.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32"23'52" EAST 31.67 FEET;
THENCE 334.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 272,48 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70"24'48" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 06"25'03" WEST 314.18 FEET;
- THENCE NORTH 41 "372r WEST 133,18 FEET;
THENCE 184,60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWEST HAVING
A RADIUS OF 573.36 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18"26'50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY
A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 50"50'52" WEST 183.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60"04'16" WEST 149.32 FEET;
THENCE 44.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84"41'37" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 17"43'30" WEST 40.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24"3719" EAST 671.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23"58'37" EAST 211.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 27"45'05" EAST 100,63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34"51'48" EAST 129.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"14'23" EAST 119,58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39"15'14" EAST 61,92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30"37'48" EAST 96.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31"09'42"' EAST 136.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31"57'25" EAST 103.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32"39'03" EAST 134.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 28"32'24" EAST 53.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31"15'49" EAST 35.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"52'12" EAST 24,66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53"49'13" EAST 22.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"30'01" EAST 46.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"16'35" EAST 70.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"49'06" EAST 48.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34"36"20" EAST 66.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"23'58" EAST 266.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35"28'00" EAST 51.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24"13'40" EAST 48.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20"29'50" EAST 62.60 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 17"32'36" EAST 44.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"02'07" EAST 134.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09"20'41" EAST 65.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"49'13" EAST 32.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02"0716" WEST 14.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 19"58'59" WEST 12.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29"55'53" WEST 20.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 58.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48"51'56" WEST 57.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42"38'48" WEST 28.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38"4748" WEST 35.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"25'04" WEST 39.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"22'11" EAST 30.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23"54'19" EAST 139.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66"53'26" EAST 241.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 64"45'28" EAST 263.29 FEET;
Page 7 of 10
~ 127230 Ver. 011- BSTOCKIiUI
-
0578S-OOO-OCJO.._O
20
WilsooMille,'
New Directions tn ;anning. Design & Engineering 8 e "1
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND -
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R!. llANOS (CONTINUED),
THENCE SOUTH 71"18'47" EAST 57,07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85'OT33" EAST 50.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"05'07" EAST 75.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'43'21' EAST 63,88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'5T08' EAST 36.24 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86'25'39" EAST 63.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81'31'21" EAST 262.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'08'03" EAST 273.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'58'13' EAST 327.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67"50'56" EAST 252.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'02'01" EAST 819.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'42'41" EAST 310.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 65'34'43" EAST 80.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'59'47" EAST 219.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'42'28" EAST 41.19 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'02'38" EAST 138.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41'09'18" EAST 91.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'57'36" EAST 83.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'51'58" EAST 305.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'38'43" EAST 343.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87'28'42" EAST 503.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'46'01" EAST 328.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37'30'20" EAST 357.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15'32'08" EAST 149.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'55'36" EAST 261.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"53'31" EAST 576.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50'45'14" EAST 202.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87"14'14" EAST 314.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76'38'32" EAST 143.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'49'43" EAST 1,054.71 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75'20'32" EAST 42.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41'43'41" EAST 38.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59'44'48" EAST 101.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82'56'38" EAST 71.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'31'27" EAST 68.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60'32'45" EAST 175.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78'18'10" EAST 41.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89"28'30" EAST 480.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'52'57" EAST 82.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59'26'48" EAST 47.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77'36'27" EAST 12.36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70'55'29" EAST 16.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47"41'12" EAST 748.88 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34'06'49" EAST 48.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14'16'24" EAST 615.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85'59'44" EAST 160.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47"06'44" EAST 110.60 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29'11 '18" EAST 480.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13"56'57" EAST 209.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'19'41" EAST 160.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 61'43'54" EAST 107.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18"58'36" EAST 69.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01'36'49" WEST 341.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'06'53" EAST 584.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CAMP KEIAS ROAD (80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00'14'32" EAST 45.99 FEET;
Page B oClD
W2OO4-127230 Ver. 011- 8ST0Cl0iAM
-
"""""""'..
21
"
WilSIJnMiller"
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
~1
.
...
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, flORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - DRI. llANOS (CONTINUED):
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 05'51'27" WEST 224.83 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 95,78 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,798.14 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'26'42" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
SOUTH 05'04'45" WEST 95.78 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 26'31'54" WEST 759.71 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00'14'33" EAST 1,537.82 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 2,347.87 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 89'29'01" EAST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CAMP KEIAS ROAD (80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 200.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 89'29'01" WEST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING 9 COURSES:
1. SOUTH 00'22'10" EAST 62.31 FEET;
2. SOUTH 00'30'10" EAST 2,674.23 FEET;
3. SOUTH 00'35'31" EAST 2,664.53 FEET;
4. SOUTH 00'38'11" EAST 2,610.24 FEET;
5. SOUTH 00'30'34" EAST 199.67 FEET;
6. 227.68 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
3,032.95 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'18'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'39'36" EAST 227.63 FEET;
7. SOUTH 04'48'38" EAST 400.93 FEET;
8. SOUTH 05'08'04" EAST 83.53 FEET;
9, SOUTH 00'29'16" EAST 1672,20 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89'04'49' WEST 604.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47'03'54' WEST 98.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52'55'08" WEST 8729 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06'39'26' WEST 102.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71"24'17' WEST 367.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 19"54'41" WEST 104.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'05'38' WEST 251.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11'04'29" EAST 79.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05'51 '31" WEST 66.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48'52'26' WEST 332.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74'56'35" WEST 80.29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 74'58'06" WEST 235.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51'40'42'WEST93.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21'53'05" WEST 241.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 77'21'09" WEST 341.17 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60'48'05" WEST 79.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'09'54" WEST 265.68 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89'36'53" WEST 1,997.38 FEET;
THENCE 77.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 739.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'00'22" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'53'58' EAST 77.51 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00'38'28" EAST 64.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00' WEST 71.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00'38'48" EAST 3,444.22 FEET;
THENCE 224.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,721.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'43'02" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01'44'02" WEST 223.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04'05'59" WEST 217.57 FEET;
Page 9000
3ISr.ZOll4-127230Ver.011-8ST~
-
""""""'.,
22
WilsooMiller"
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
'Be
411
.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36.
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT"N - D.R.1. UANDS (CONTINUEO),
THENCE 153.40 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTiAl CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,277.17 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'51'35' AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02"10'28" WEST 153.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06'34'56" EAST 1,190.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF SAID Oil WEll ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 88'54'34" WEST 256.81 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,995.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED O.!l' ~UTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16 BEING SOUTH 88'54'34" WEST,
BY: ~-e'? ~ J?tf"
BRADLEY ,STOCKHAM, P.S.M. lS#6390
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #lB-43
REF: 4H-125, SHEETS 1-5
DATE: AUGUST 29,2003
REVISIONS: 1, OCTOBER 16, 2003
2. MARCH 3, 2004
Page 10oflO
$'S/2OlM..12123Ov.:01J.B~
-
03111lJ..OClO..OOO.O
23
'8G
...,
8, List all agencies (local, state and federal) from which approval and/or a permit must
be obtained prior to initiation of development. Indicate the permit or approval for
each agency and its status, Indicate whether the development is registered or
whether registration will be required with the Division of Florida Land Sales,
Condominiums and Mobile Homes under Chapter 478, Florida Statutes, Indicate
whether the development will be registered with the H.U,D" Division of Interstate
Land Sales Registration or with other states,
A. Collier County
1. DRI Development Order
2. SRA (Stewardship Receiving Area) Designation
4. Excavation Permit
5. Right-of-Way Permit
6. Site Development Plan Approval
7. Final Subdivision Plat Approval
8. Utility franchise and approval of water and sewer utility
B. State of Florida
1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
a) General Permit for Wastewater Collection System
b) General Permit for Potable Water Distribution System
c) Wastewater Facility or Activity Permit Application Form 1 (Form
62-620.901 (1))
d) Wastewater Application Form 2A for a Domestic Wastewater
Facility Permit (Form 62-620.901 (2))
e) Application For A Specific Permit To Construct PWS Components
(Form 62-555.900(1)
2. South Florida Water Management District
a) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
b) Consumptive Use Permit
c) Right-of-Way Permit
3. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
a) Potable Water
4. Florida Legislature
a) Creation of Chapter 189, Special District - signed by Governor in
June,2004
C. Federal
1. Army Corps of Engineers
a) Individual Section 404 Permit
2.
Environmental Protection Agency
a) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit
7/2312004.135516 Ver:OH_MPERRY
~
037B6-013-000. PDRI. 28423
8-1
r Be
~1
PART II, General Section
QUESTION 9 - MAPS
The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map
should be determined at the preapplication conference.
Map A.
MapB,
MapC.
A general location map. Indicate the location of any urban service area boundaries
and regional activity centers in relation to the project site.
A recent vertical aerial photo of the site showing project boundaries which
reasonably reflects current conditions. Specify the date the photo was taken.
A topographic map with project boundaries identified (contour intervals from one to
five feet should be determined in consultation with the appropriate regional
planning council and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication conference).
Delineate 1 OO-year flood prone areas (including hurricane flood zones) and
indicate major land surface features. If applicable, delineate the coastal
construction control line.
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
MapD,
MapE,
Map F-1,
Map F-2.
MapG,
7f2~ 135516 Ver. 011- MPERRY
,-,
03786-013-000-PDRI-26423
1.
In addition to the 1 OO-year flood delineation, Map C should depict the mean annual
flood and 25-year flood elevations (pre-development).
2.
A topographic map with project boundaries identified, delineating the mean annual,
25-year and 100-year flood elevations after development.
A land use map showing existing and approved uses on and abutting the site. The
uses shown should include existing on-site land uses, recreational areas, utility and
drainage easements, wells, right-of-way, and historic, archaeological, scientific and
architecturally significant resources and lands held for conservation purposes.
A soils map of the site, with an identification of the source of the information. The
use of a source other than the most recently published U.S.DA Soil Conservation
Service (SCS) soil surveys should be determined in consultation with the
appropriate regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the
preapplication conference.
A vegetation associations map indicating the total acreage of each association,
based on the Level III vegetation types described in The Florida Land Use and
Cover Classification System: A Technical Report. available from each regional
planning council.
A wetlands map showing the location and extent of areas that are jurisdictional
wetlands to SFWMD.
A location map of all transects. trap grids, or other sampling stations used to
determine the on-site status of significant wildlife and plant resources. Show
9-1
MapH,
Map 1-1,
Map 1-2.
MapJ,
7123J2O().(. 135516 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
-
03786-013-QOO.PDRI-28423
I t. f II b d"fi t 'Idl'f d It. rd. h8 C, t.'-l
oca Ion 0 a 0 serve sign! lcan WI I e an p an resources, an s ow oca Ion
of suitable habitat for all significant resources expected to be on-site.
A master development plan for the site. Indicate proposed land uses and
locations, development phasing, major public facilities, utilities, preservation areas,
easements, right-of-way, roads, and other significant elements such as transit
stops, pedestrian ways, etc. This plan will provide the basis for discussion in
Question 10-A as well as other questions in the ADA.
Existing drainage map.
A master drainage plan for the site. Delineate existing and proposed: drainage
basins, flow direction, water retention areas, drainage structures, flow route off site,
drainage easements, waterways, and other major drainage features. (This
information may be presented on two separate maps (existing and proposed), if
desired.)
A map of the existing highway and transportation network within the study area.
The study area includes the site, and locations of all transportation facilities which
are substantially impacted. This area should be finally defined on the basis of the
findings of the traffic impact analysis, including determinations of where the criteria
for a substantial impact are met. Map J will become the base for the maps
requested in Question 21,
9-2
--
-
--.
<
m
<
m
;u
Gl
o
m
en
<
30LDEN G E BLVD
<
o
Legend
~ 500ft Restoration Zone
D Open . Big Cypress National Forest
. Water Retention Area (WRA) I. Area of Critical Slale Concern
. Flowway Stewardship Area (FSA). Stew.ardshiP ~endjng Areas (SSA's)
. Habitat Stewardship Area (HSA). (EXisting, Pending and Propelllld)
INTERSTATE 75
r . T ~ _w~
;<;i" Z ~ * _"""'[Ii MAP A WilsonMille
,,I" ;;,?>'::
0
, ~ GENERAL LOCATION MAP
~ i H ..
0' TOWN OF AVE MARIA P!aII/ltrSoEnllinflfH'l.Ecalogim.SlIIveYOfll
i~ I~ ~ Land$capeArthitects.TrrlJlportlltiol1Con.uIlan/S
" > . WllsonMiller,lnc.
0 ~
~ " Ny... . FOfIMy.,..SlruOlil' 8,.<tomon.r".",..T.lhh...H.P,.,m.City8N<h
9 '" I N DDC'DADC'n I:'nc. t..11:'\AI TnlA,." nJ:'\/C'1 nCUC"IT III D 31IIOBoJIoy(on..SuJltm.NIpI..,Florid.:UI05-8S01
-
~
1
,
~ "
"
N ~
~ I~ I~ > I~ ~
0
" c
...... , ,0 , "
MAP B
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Wils(JnMi/~
..
Plannm. Enllmffll'J' Er%giIII. SuMlyorr
LantnC<lpeArchitscts. TrBlIIpOrtltionCoolultann
W1lsonM/IIer,lnc.
/UfM..Fort"'y.,..S.,.I<II..fhdM!ton.r...."..T.IIohuH.."-'-CIlyBHch
J2OI/B~~ItyL'~~~~~~: ~~!!!~, -
I"'U:u=I"'tAD~n I:I"'\D. ..n:::\AI TI"'\\An,1 nll:'\Il:'l nDI..U::"'IT I I I D
1
'"
,..
,..
i'.'
i'.'
;a.
p.'
;,..
,..
'"
,..
iU
:'. ,!"
p.'
,!,.'
.I'.'
-''''I','
'"
i~'-'''
"
i",
~~.
p.' ,!.,
J" .I"
..~
I'I
,." i'.'
,..,
".
~.'
1'.' \\;..
A
I'.' \. p',- p.'
;~"~\.\...,..,..'"
i" -".., ""~
.,.,-, p.' i
. '.II ..1M:
}'~w;!:"J ,
~'I:
.I"',"
i" i'~
..':
'!.i'~~" I'.' .I"'j
_.'.'-.~,,' J....
-~,~ ,
JJ;.il" '''"'i''
;.I"~'
;:oJ\J )'"
ii
1..,'''' ".
-'dpl ;"
;;~-- .--,~lG-:;;_' 0
,.
J'~
,-
."'-,
,..
P'
'"''J'''
-
--..
I'I,MOKAL~[ ROAD '00' RIGrll -0' -WAY
25
,!'-')" -.,w,'-'J'-' ~,I ," 'II 'u
,10.' __.~;..... '1<>_1 P :i,/,P",iU; I\~,
i"'~joh.,.. I" I.... ,I" 1<:" J" ~~~ ~~'~r ~~__ ~ ,'-' ~;E)' "'''''. '\")~J
_.r' '- .0.' I ~ 'P'ih p' 'I'~------';)'
/;:; ~'-' :.: }" ~.'3 ;''r!-..~..-, i." \ ,~,;.;;:,~==~,nC-~:l:l "'1'1 p.,;;"', Ii
}" ;O;"';V~' ,,:, ~'>?' " ,1>'.0 }', 1'" - ~" p.' ....,;1--- ----~,
..' JO"I'.-"> .." ,;.~, }'i-..!~' I' ;.. p.. '
;'.0 }" ~,..}'-' '~: T""'" 1j.;,.:, ;,,-f 1" :::~~ ": ~.~~~--~~~- ~ }" ~II" ~"- J~~--~'!'I r"
1" ~" ~1.' i" I J'.o ,,, .I" J'~ "'1- ----::- ..l.!L.J ___ ~I
)l" ;0.., ;0' J'-''''~)' ;" rAI"--,t~_~'~L----"r"
Z";' .....,;0. )0-' ).....;" J'" i.,'~I~i~~'#4 I___~--"'.L' I,:.'
'. '. ""-:"'>~.' . I',", ;, J'.' ".""P'''.' ~,. ~~_
. '"" .... __ii., Jh..,"l~'~;~",l'" i:..: .I'.' .II.> "u ;" .i I" ~ "'''; _~'= _~~_~ __ i" j
~.~ ,/0,,, JO.' ,.... v/ ~_~:.F;JJi i~~.. J J1.I~ .....-.... 1"oJ"" J..~O"~.v.~ J -~ -I --
, ..' ,.. 29'~'''''' J'.' )1. i I'" (~-----'"I>'-,~--
,/ I' ( , 'I' \-:',1" 1..1 ;.. J" I~.~" Jo"%;.---..7; ~__ 1"---=__ J'
,;0 ~ .... J" ).. . I" J" ,,'.' ' )';--.)~':,:~~~~ iu"f' ;"\Xlr;r~ ~_ ~LO, ---;
i'.' ;" J")'" JU .1''-' , ,/0.:":. i')';O-O ;.. J -..., / J"I "..' I" I -;1. ----
;.., iU .i" )'.' J'.' i.~..,..:,'.~..,j_\., .i.j (' ~"'I.'~il;'''' J...... .';:o~ "'~':::-~':::=-J'
,.. ,.. .''' ,.. ". ,.. 'u i"'i,:, ri:'~ r1' 1IIIr ~rmll\1l.I:C"':"'" :~" - --I
.,OJ ',' ;.i:--=~~i'rr.I' ')1, ~ l ~, I>.c".,<, if. ,;:; ll- -I" p'
i"1 J" i" JU J."'....-,;;;?)l.,__ I' w'--' J"
'"
~
.
,
~
o
,
~
o
"
"
ro
o
<
c
~
~
<
w
~
)'.'
,..
i"' .I','".
"J'"
.'"'
,..
".
,..
".
,u
JU
11.1
\\\
\\\;, J..
,'I 11"
;1~\
>
I" JU
,.,
,..
,'-'
,,- ]'-'
,.,
,..
,..
J'I.tI:-, )"
,..
i'.'
;'.J
.II>
p.l
,..
I"
,..
.I'"
,..
,..
F' ;'-'
.i,.,
,.
".
J'.'
J"
p'
I"
.,.
,.
p.1
i'I.'
,,,
,In
p.,
,..
"..
,,,
'''36 '"
p.'
.i'I~
'"
,.,
."-'
,H
p'
1'.0
,..
,..
p.'
,..
,'U
".,
I'.' ;'.'
,..
1'.'
p.'
.'"
,..
p.'
,.,.".'
-', JU
}'.'
,..
./,..
~'-'
P'
;';'.;C_-~~- ;<4> )'-f."'" ." I'" ;1.i;!-"~'" ":ff'~ }'-' p.,' ._~ .'"
P' ~,.~'~ I' ;.. ~'I/." ,u.l ~.. ,; I 11..
;,.., }i ':, I ." ;;;.___ !,,;u liP'll ./" JI.'
~.. ii . .'" J i I i" I' I i'-' .'"
"J' ,~. ''')1 .p.I." J.l~ ;" '/
;oi)" 1. .' }",.. I / i.", ;..f;d ".! .,~... M'
,~,';., .' I J";'--';P .,~....~ P'I" p..' / JI.O l/ ~..' ....
~')" 1J" I' 'p., I ~-"< ~ J~., r1p., ~1.' ;0.'
,Ill'.'! .~'J' ,p.' ; p..J~'. ~. "'-.;r.""':~-.,,_< ~'i/ :>J:1-'-
. },.' "J- I" j'.L' Iii'"'' .'" i'-' .,i''J-.----};"M' I" ." ~,~ )."
i~,~ )1 ~-",.'_ PI '. .'~.... -~..." Mill ..- ,,-- .
-;.., ii"~" 1'-' 1'" ~"J" ./,,''.If'' ./'~ . ",,,,;~.,.. )U !,~ !".
}" }'-' ~ I.'.... ." ~V" JI_' ,- . M?/1::~!),7'l1p;;
~ ~" ." 1'-' ,,\''\' -..::~ ~. '1It/i,//' IP7il
.,.-1" ~.. ," ~')>.."'O ;)'1 <I/;:/ffi
Jl.' 1" J' '''5;1>-' p."., ;.., . \\, \ ",,' 'I}
~ .'.' ." p..' p-~\ """ .,., """~
;,)';.., >'~ ~-1:: ii" J'-' ....
;,. ~" I I .I" J'.'
( '''G,.,~'' J'"
\ J"'- .~,n,., ~...
"" Y;'-_._~~~ ~';r
, p..... ~., 1',' .'., )
I"",PI '0 ,) ...~, .;~-;-_;>.-!.~~~~__.-;, l'~
~.." 1'., l'~ ~A1.' ~" l'~ 1'-'
~
i"
J'.'
JU
i'.'
J'.'
'"
'"
.I'"
i,..if":iu;'" '"
p'
J'~
~..ii
,u ". "~"'flllli I:
>" i,Ji'
,P' ,.. "I "'1111
,,",:I'II'IIII!llil '"
"'I,lilH'~llllil' '1
n-; I
,..
P' 4
,1.1
,n
;u
"
P'
iP
"
J"'P"
,n
i'.'
iM
,
i'.'
....
\\
..
1'-' P--'
)1.'
T];. .."",
~,.. "".
~<\O P"~Jn--
';\~~;~~~~'Jll '-; 'i
A;.,. ~'. ii ~...
1...l,.."1
I'~ ,-1".1
J~~ ./'::'
-___u
)'-'
.'.y"
-""
p'
I ~"
p..
;'.,
J'.'
" .".'
,..
.'".'
,,,
P'
)'-' p.'
,.
P
'1 ,.
"'.j
i'-' .iU,,"
,.
.I'.'
,j
"
, .;'~
.) ,
,'.'
J'.'
.i"-' .-'"
,J'.'
P'
,..
-".'
J'.'
0'.'
p.1
J'.'
'"
ii.'
,..
,..
'\
p.l
i'.'
'"
'u
,..
J'.'
i'.'
,..
;..,
;,.,
"
-1('
0"
,..
;'-'
J'-'
P'
0"
-".'
__o~': .-'"
~
J'-'
J'-'
,..
~
,.,
,"
.".'
".
t~
~
,..
,..
".
;'-'
..
,..
....
".'
,..
;...
,..
-:;,,-
~
/
""'I
I'"
,..
J'.'
i'"
....
0'.'
,..
J'.'
"'.'
--~~~
p'
'"
r.
p.'
....,
i'.'
JI.'
)'.'
J""" ,
_;J,.~'I
J"" "
J'.1
NOT A SURVEY
".
.i"
;'-'
:"..~,
,..
,..
,..
1';"
"..
,.
,.
J'.'
i'.'
.i'
P'
J'.'
i"-'J'"
,u
1'.'
, ,
p.
-'-;>U- j! ~~___:""__1'~ _ _~..-_
_'~ fr' IU )~, i"
".., 1'"... JIl.' J".' ~
"' ,;:'t::;.~" ""',,;,::' "
J"'-ft.\~l 9
')1'
'-1.
~
~
u
i JU .'"
.'.._ _-.l~'..
,..
p.'
--~
;JO.I
"
.II.>
;.~ ;'.'
'p,.
,.
,.
;1-1
,.
P~
;'-'
,.
~,
,..
F'
,..
0"
".
".'
i'"
,..
~
"
p.'
i'.'
1'-'
"
J'.'
'"
')'"
;'.1.1;
'"
,..
'''I
,..
.... "u
J'.'
i'.'
JU ,'.' p.'
),.'
.".'
J'.'
'"
.I'."
F'
''"
,,,12,,,.0,..
,.
i" ;..,
p.'
,..
'-'"'f
-,,, 1'1
J" II)"
",..1
I,
,\
"
0"
".
,..
JI.'
,U
1'-' i"
}~.,
),It'" J"'.i'"
p'
i";'-'JoJ''''''
..'0-.
J1.'
,..
.'.'
,..
'"
J'.'
,..
;...
~..,
p
p.'
J'.'
...,
p.'
.10.'
p.'
'"
,u
,..
0"
....i';;;l
,u
,u
;",j,
;"
,"
,..
iO~ ,
."~
,..
IU
p.'
i"O
}'"
)U :ii
;.,11;
"
'::jll r
",.. ,j I
":..0" (i'1
"',..::: ,,:..' (:~;'l
-I'" J" I
;., J: .,,1
,..
.1'.' .I"
i" .
,.
I" ,
,.,
P'
iU .'" ,,.." ~. )'.'
I )~,
i'.'
i","
,.,
}'.,'
'to'''')''
,..
J".::
..
J'"
"
;"
,.
.".'
J'.I
i'.'
",,1"")
,..
,..
,..
;1.,/
/i"
J~'
.,",'
i'.'
~...
J" ~f,'
P'
JI.'
,u
J'.' .I"
i'J ;"
J'." ~'~-?;;;'~,:'i'"
P';"
,..
)'.1 I'.'
".
!
i:;"
J'" i,
,..
J'"
,..
;..,
J'.'
JU
,..
,U
i"-' .,_,
,..
J'-'
,..
".
.".'
'"
,..
,..
" ;,~
in
i'-'
.in
;..,
I~l~._
J'.'
J'"
J'.'
J'" r'
."
i'.!
i'"
F.' )"
)"J..I
,",'" I"
,.,
".
,..
i';)";"
0"
....
,'.'
,u
p.,
J'.'
I~' i"
;..(J'"
I J"
~ ,..
"
." '1 6'~.
,..
JI"i01
)i~~,___ .... J'~
-;~;i~-:'~~';;-J
JI.'
po'
.....
.I'.'
JU
.'-" i.'
j"
~._~:,r~'.-...c~I.'
~.c~~;o:;-.---;J~~~ JU
JU ," 1.1":'. .~.
)" .".' .~..:;~~J"
,..
"...
J'.~
,..
i'.1
).3,..
J'.'
,..
.I'"
18
p.,
p'
i'"
;,.,
i'.'
p'
;"1" ,....,
,..
.".'
,..
J'.. J'.' "'''J;;l.' "~u"'" .I""!"
'Ii..... .".' JUi,.,
I"~ i'-';"";'" J'O ,I"'''''
)'.1)" JU
.....,,;i.~i~J...i... .'"
i" J" .I" ,.J~' J'\ J"')U,l"-'
J'.'
.I'"
".
p.'
.''-'
,..
J....
iO''''J'"P"
,.\ l
, "'.\J~ "t..
:")ti~~::'~;f;~.
i" 1.1 >
)'. ' 'i J"~., i'-' ....1" p.'
p-'
."'J'"
p.'
,..
p.'
'"
j~; ~"
'"
;'..'
,..
.1'-'
F'
,..
.....J...
,..
II
'"
pA,/I.'
.,.'
,..
"..,
p.. ""1"
.'.'
J'.'
i'.'
," JU IU
~'-'
J'.'
0"
,..
')U
",p.'.
A'1;:.
P.'i'-'
J:j.7'-.~..,.!.,
.I~''''
~
el' wn ,_ ROAiJ 100' RleHT -m~WAY
0"
,..
,.,
,'"
,'1"
'I'.'
J'.'
,':'
}I.'
...t
P'
,.
,..
'"
,..
,u
J'"
.".'
p., .I"
,..
.''' ;..
J"
,,,
....1
GlN~RAL N::JITS'
1 i'ARC[( CONTAIf\S 4995_0 ACRES MORE OR ~ESS
2 PAflCEL Llrs WlfHIN ZONE "0" I~ER [i-OOD II\SURANCE RATE MAr
PANEL NUM8U; 1:21106-, 2750 TillS PANEL liAS "NOT BEEN PRINTED
ARtA IN lONE f)", PF'< MAP INDF.X I)Alr.l) JULY :2U, 1998,
3, roPOGRAPHIC I>,JFORM,IITIO'-l SHOWN rEREON A'\C [lASeD ON ~QV111
~QLI WAH'i< MANA(;fMfNI I);SIRWI ISI'l'l'MU1.....cL\MP "'\iJ!\S__;;;lliilliLl
A.Rr::A. .A.E..RJ8.L ';IJRVEY "RO IFCT TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS_(!::-,iJ,TED.-2QQP),
4.000' ~.
'..
N
o 1.000 2.000
,
GRAPHIC SCALE
I'. ")'.A
CO:,':' iJ~T0'~:Vri~.I)( \'iUR\' l il:lb\ '-fl-: 251\.a'''9
"
.
dlnUIH
1
I~
w
~
......
~""
_-..J~::r;
;;'0/'::::.
.
~
u
"
"
MAP C
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsOnMille
..
P/ann9r1' Engineers. Eco/ogiIt3. SulVtyDTS
LandacapeArchitecta.rrllllpOlTari<mConsullants
WJlsonMil/er. Inc, .
/hpIo..FOITMy""S.r_..Brodtnlon.T_.T~.....P",,_CltyB
32OO&I"lL_,Sul"2(JI).~.,F'ofidI:UflJ5.850'
"
c,
DDCDADcn I:'I"\D. ..III:'\A' TI"\\A'''' nll:'\lCI I"\DI.IC".T I I . D
-
~,
-.>.
~ 0 I
,,' ::'1
16 I; .
"
MAP 0
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsllnMille
"
Planner!' EngineerJ. Ecolllf1lJB. SulVtyM
Landsc.peArchit8dl.TIlIntp(lll.Ii<HIConlUlUlItS
WilsonMlller, Inc.
NopIt. . ForlMym . SIt,..",. . B..dfnlM. T_. T.iIMl.._. PonllMCllyBHoh
321J1)&!",L~,_S~~_. ~:F/~~IOs.a501
"
~ I
~ ,
;!;;~
"-
> "
o ,
~ ,~
.~ Iw
"
o
DDCDADcn enD. "-IC\AI Tn\A/~ nC\l1:1 nDaJII:::...IT I I I D
-
-.
g
I
;;~~
~
..
>"
0 "
"- w I~ ~
, " ~
-.>. 0 I~ i
,m .,
MAP E
SOILS MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsllnMille
"
P/,lnrHIll' Engine".. Ecologillll' Surwy0t5
L,oosuptArchi/lCU, TIlIIlIpO!1,/IoIlConllllUnts
W1lsonMlller, Inc.
NopIo..Forl!lyOlll.s",.....Brodonron.T."",..rdlho_.pon.",.CltyS""'h
321J1)~~~~:~S:;~~n'_ ~H~::."'!!:~!~5-.'ISlJ7
,
<
DDCDADcn enD. Me\Al Tn\Alf\l nl:'\Il:'l nDllICf\lT I I I D
--
-
en
"
~
~
1>~l=l>d~l=n "'n~. III"'W TnWIII n",v",. nI>M"'IIIT I I . I>
-.>.
N
W
MAP F-1
FLUCCSNEGETATION MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
W!!~!'lJ!~!~~
L,oosc.peArchl/,CII.rrllllpCll.lionCOIIIUlUIltS
WllsonMlller, Inc.
HopI<.. ForllrlyOl>' SIt_"'-. BrodonlM .T_. T~.._. ~Ci/y8Hch
321J1)~~~~~~"._N:,::,~;~-:::!::!U50' ..
--
-
--.
"
....., <
~
~ I "
"- >
! ~ I 0 ~
0
-.>. w ",
m
MAP F-2
SFWMD WETLANDS MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsonMille
"
P""IlfN$. Engmflfl/'5' EcDlogiltl . SUMlyorl
Llnds"peArchiteGt5.Tllnll/OrtJtionCotIfultsal,
WilsonMiller,lnc.
N.pW..FoIIllf<<lI.S.,....'..~".T_.T.IIo...H..,..".",.CitylHoch
J2(J()tu..~,.JL.~~~~~.. ~~!!!~'
DDCDADcn enD. MC\^, Tn\A/M nC\lc, nDUCMT . . . D
-
.-.,
Species Legend
Common Name
li American Alligator
. Caracara
Iij) Kestrel
Ii? Limpkin
Ii) Little Blue Heron
Iil Roseate Spoonbill
Iil Sandhill Crane
Iil Snowy Egret
Iil T ri-colored Heron
8 White Ibis
(1,) Wood Stork
e Burrowing Owl
& Burrows
Legend
c:::J DRI
Vehicle Transects
Pedestrian Transects
~
CO ~
u
.,
w
" "
I c,
-.>. 19 ~
MAP G
TRANSECTS/LISTED SPECIES MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Dg~DAD-=n I:nD. hU::W TnWlJ nC\le. nD....c...T I I I D
WilsonMiller, Inc.
1Up/e..fottlll)'*S.S.,...,'..8rl>MntDn.r.""'..T.IIW....._.C
32fJ(JB"!.WyL'~!~~~~~.' ~",~",:1d.311fJ5.8517
--
-,
~
,
"
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
HSA
WRA
o
WRA
o
HSA
o
R
FSA
HSA
HSA
AMU
(
,
R
o
:l>
s:
"
^
m
:l>
WRA
(f)
FSA
;u
o
:l>
o
o
R
R I
I
I
....___...... I
.. ........ I
.....-,
"
"
"
"
WRA
R
,
"
"
,
,
,
"
o
R
HSA
,
,
,
\
\
I
I
I
o
@
I
, I
________________L_______________
OIL
WE L L
ROAD
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
,
"
"
"
,
DRI LAND USE SUMMARY
[ AMU I UNIVERSITY / SCHOOLS
R I RESIDENTIAL
[ 1,1,' I MIXED USE
[,~!kl COMMUNITY FACILITY
_ WETLAND PRESERVE
[L] PARK
[(b::J I LAKE PARKS
995 AC
2,921 AC
211 AC
OFF-SITE RLSA DESIGNATIONS
[__~~~ RLSA FLOWWAY STEWARDSHIP AREA
I--WRAI RL5A WATER RETENTION AREA
iHSAl RLSA HABITAT STEWARDSHIP AREA
o RL$A OPEN
,
"
,
328 AC
62 AC
61 AC
175 AC
"
"
"
ROADWAYS
242 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
4,000' ~
,U
NORTH
..... DRIBOUNDARY
4,995 AC
o 1,000 2,000
"<;'t I ANr. liS' '" A~SI"CAr"'NS ANO AL""AC;'-~ s,<nWN ^~OVl MAY INLllHl' IN11 RNA.l
"""1.0 IAKI-S,'H"NSI'AU MUijrtHf;~u"pnRl",r,.tSFS
[ 1::!1 T * ,> i 0 , ~Wm
,. z . l , :"W~ MAP H
!""- . I t ;;~~
"
" " " ~ MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
<D I H
>' TOWN OF AVE MARIA
1--: I~ w
" o , !~ ~
-.>. ~I ~ ~
,~ ru::)~nA D~n ~nD. ....::\., Tn,.,... nl:'\l1:' I I"\DI.JIIl:::"'IT III D
WilsonMilltRO
PI8~ners.f:ifleers.fcoklgiS,..Sufllllyors ~
Ulnt:/fc.lpeArchi/e{;f$.TtanspoltahonCOll.u/t8nrs
WilsonMiller, Inc.
NIph1. . FotlMy"" . ~"'OI' . BrIKI.""",. T_. T.IfMlH"'. PMwMCi/yBHch
32()0~IfJL&I}!.~S!.".~~: ~:!..~!1!~'
<
~
.-.
.....,
ill I" . i
z
I'"
-.>. " ~
0 ..
0'
e w
~ w I ~
-.>. i~ 16 ~
"
WilsllnMi/~
"
Pl8nners.EngiflfIfIfI.E,%gisII.SUrYe)'llfS
Land/l(;'pIlMrhitects.T"~litJnCOlllUlt.on15
W1lsonMlller, Inc.
/NpJf..For/MyOTli.S.~,".B'odf"ron.T."",..rllllh._.P/lll.",.CIIYII
3200s.lloyLllllo,SuJ/o2fJ(J .N.,.u,Florid.34fOU5IJ7
",,"".1lg.&It..uuO.F..23t.&43.&11&
MAP 1-1
EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
DD"'l>d~"'n ",n~. N"'W TnWN nl=Vl=1 nI>M"'IIIT I I I I>
.~
,
0
0
-.>.
-.>.
0 I l~ "
~ I~ > ~
, 0 "
-.>. . i "
,. "
-
--.
MAP 1-2
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsllnMille
"
P!anIlM.ElI/linf6f1"~'SuIWl)Wli
L.tndsCllpeAn;h/ffcrt.r"lIfIIOlt.lfionConlullllnlt
WilsonAflller, Inc.
1Up/lI. . F",tIIl".,. . So,...,. . ~n. T"""", T.IlI11nyo. -"CIlyBHch
J2(J(J~~If!:~'~~~~.". ~:!::!:!::~'
DDE:DA Dl::n I:nD. t...11:'\AI Tn\Alt.J ne\/e. nD....c....T I I I D
~
HENDRY CO
CORKSCREW RD
.,
-oJ
<.11
o
c
"
IMMOKALEE RD
B ACH RD
OIL WELL RD
IMMOKALEE RD
RANDALL BLVD
)>
;:c
-c
o
~ PIN lOGE RD
-c
c
r-
r-
Z
Gl
;:c
C GOLDEN GATE
::E
r-
en
o
z
[ll
<
GOLDEN GATE BLVD C
m
<
m
;:c
Gl
>
C
m
en
[ll
<
C
C/J
;0
I\)
co
o
;0
co
c.n
~
RADIO RD
1-75
DAVIS BLVD
Legend
- ROADS
~ DRI BOUNDARY
C/J
;0
co
c.n
~
~!' ~ ~ Iii
-.>. !
N
~.: UL I~ I
o 0 0 ~ '"
~ ., ~ :-' ['i
~;!~~
- - ~
g;~
w
MAP J
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
@-
NO
WilsllnMille
"
PJanT/ffl. Engineers. Ee%gill5 . SUMlyors
L,ndliQlpeAIOhitec", rrln.pOltlltionConlullan"
"
~
I "
DDI::DADl::n I:nD. ~11::'A1 Tn'A/~1 nC\lCI nDUCMT I I I D
WilsonMlI/er, Inc.
1IopIe..ronUj'MO./io...,,'..BmJonlM.T_.r./WIH...."-"-CltyBHch
W)()s.u.,L_,S~2f1i).N4pJH,F_;U10U5tl'
""___ .......M. _ ~.. .......n..
Be
QUESTION 10 - GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Part I Specific Project Description
A. Describe and discuss in general terms all major elements of the proposed
development in its completed form. Include in this discussion the proposed phases
(or stages) of development (not to exceed five years), magnitude in the appropriate
units from Chapter 28-24, F.A.c., where applicable, and expected beginning and
completion dates for construction.
The Town of Ave Maria (hereinafter referred to as the Town or as Ave Maria) has been
planned under an innovative rural planning strategy created for 195,000 acres of land
located in eastern Collier County called the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship
Area or RLSA. The Town will encompass 4.995 acres and is planned in accordance with
the goals, objectives, and policies contained in Collier County's Growth Management Plan,
and the development standards contained in the Land Development Code for the RLSA.
These planning policies and land development regulations have been nearly five years in
the making, resulting from a comprehensive and collaborative planning process.
The RLSA encourages the retention of agriculture, protection of natural resources and
diversification of the rural economy by application of an incentive-based credit system.
The RLSA promotes the planning and development of new communities in the rural area
to accommodate population growth in a more compact, self-sufficient and sustainable
manner than was previously allowed. Under the RLSA Overlay, Stewardship Credits are
generated from the designation of Stewardship Sending Areas (SSA's), which are areas
designated for protection of natural resources and agriculture, and utilization of those
credits to entitle development in Stewardship Receiving Areas (SRA's), where new
communities are permitted and natural resource values are low. The Town of Ave Maria
is the first Stewardship Receiving Area to be designated under the RLSA program.
The initiative for the creation of the Town came from a unique and exciting opportunity to
site a new private university campus in Collier County, Ave Maria University (AMU). Long
time property owners, the Barron Collier Company, donated the campus site and they
have formed a partnership with AMU named New Town Development, LLLP, to jointly
develop the new town. The University is expected to become a center of educational,
intellectual and spiritual activities within the Town and for the Southwest Florida Region.
The Town will be a mixed-use community, planned using the principals of walkability and
self-sufficiency. The Town Master Plan (Map H) depicts the general location and
configuration of major community land uses and features, The Town will consist of
residential neighborhoods ("R") connected by a network of low speed streets and
sidewalks, a mixed-use town center ("M"), where residents and students will be provided
essential goods and services, civic gathering places, entertainment. dining, employment,
and housing. The Community Facility District (CF) accommodates civic, institutional,
governmental, and essential services necessary to support Town residents. The
Wetland Preserves (W), Parks (P), and Lakes (L) establish the open space and
recreational framework of the Town. Design guidelines and an integrated plan for
landscaping, signage, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and community services will
7/2312004-135516 Ver.01!-MPERRY
~
03796-013-000-PORt.28423
10-1
QC'"
tie the neighborhoods together, creating a viable town structure, while providing for
individual neighborhood identity. The AMU Campus will accommodate a full range of
educational, administrative, housing. recreational and support facilities to support
university activities.
The Town will include the following land uses identified in Chapter 28-24, FAC.:
11,000 residential dwelling units
690,000 square feet of retail/service
510,000 square feet of office
400 hotel rooms
a 6,000-student university
In addition to the DRI threshold uses described above, the Town may include up to 450
units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and
miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, public and private
schools, uses such as golf courses, lakes, open space, and community support facilities,
and those uses customarily associated with a university such as student and
administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support facilities.
In addition to the DRI review, Collier County policies will require the Town to obtain a
Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) designation from the Board of County
Commissioners. This designation has already been obtained for the 960 acre PDA area
in the center of the Town, and the applicant anticipates amending this SRA to include
the balance of the Town concurrently with the DRI review process. The SRA will provide
further definition to the Town's plan by creating specific districts and design standards
to establish neighborhoods of varying character. To provide a full range of housing
opportunities for future residents, it is envisioned that neighborhood areas within the
town will be targeted to different segments of the housing market and lifestyles,
including primary housing, vacation homes, entry level homes, retirement homes.
apartments, and age targeted neighborhoods,
The entire site of the Town of Ave Maria falls within an open or undesignated
classification of the RLSA, which means that it has minimal natural resource value and
is best suited to accommodating new development. Under the RLSA natural resource
scoring system, no part of the Town reaches the index threshold of significant natural
resource value. However. the Town of Ave Maria will indirectly have a significant positive
impact on natural resource protection. As provided by the Collier County RLSA policies,
natural resources will be protected and agriculture activities will be retained through the
establishment of Stewardship Sending Areas (SSA's) that will generate the Stewardship
Credits needed to entitle the Town, Including the acreage of the SSA's utilized to entitle
the PDA, an estimated 20,000 acres of SSA's will be protected to entitle the Town. All
SSA's are subject to a Stewardship Easement, which preserves the natural resources and
protects agricultural activities within these areas by removing the potential for incompatible
future development.
The Florida Department of Community Affairs and New Town Development LLLP have
entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) and Collier County has
approved the first phase of the Town by designating the PDA area as a Stewardship
Receiving Area (SRA). Pending approval of the South Florida Water Management
District Environmental Resource Permit and other local development approvals, the PDA
712312004.135516 VerOll-MPERRY
0-
0378&-01J..(J()()..PDRI-28423
10-2
8e
will allow the start of construction for the University and Town on 960 acres, while DRI
review is underway for the balance of the Town. The PDA phase will focus on creating
essential campus facilities, and on providing the homes, commercial services and civic
assets required by families associated with the University, and is organized in five
districts - the Town Core, Town Center, Neighborhood General, University and
Community Services; each will support a mix of uses and will promote a diverse and
successful community.
The DRI has two phases. Phase I will conclude in 2011 and Phase II will conclude in
2016. These dates are best estimates and will be governed by market and economic
conditions beyond the control of the applicant.
B. Provide a breakdown of the existing and proposed land uses on the site for each
phase of development through completion of the project. The developed land uses
should be those identified in Section 380.0651, F.S. and Chapter 28-24, F.A.c. Use
Level III of The Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System: A Technical
Report (September 1985), available from each regional planning council. Refer to
Maps 0 (Existing Land Use) and H (Master Plan). Use the format below and treat
each land use category as mutually exclusive unless otherwise agreed to at the
preapplication conference.
712312~ 135516 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
0_'
0311l6-013.CJOQ.-PDRI-28423
10-3
Be
"
Table 10.1.8-1: Existing Land Use Descriptions
FLUCCS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
211 Imoroved Pastures 583,1 11.7
212E1 Unimproved Pastures, 10-24% exotic cover 5.2 0.1
214 Row Crons 3356.8 67.2
242 Sod Farms 327.4 6.6
260 Other Onen Lands - Rural 28.4 0.6
261 Fallow Croo Land 133.0 2.7
310D Herbaceous (Drv Prairiel, disturbed 5.3 0.1
321 Palmetto Prairies 42.8 0.9
329 Other Shrubs and Brush 18.7 0.4
330 Mixed Ranneland 39.5 0.8
411 Pine Flatwoods, saw oalmetto understorv 15.2 0.3
411E3 Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understorv 50-75% exotic cover 0.5 0.0
411E4 Pine Flatwoods saw nalmetto understorv, >75% exotic cover 0.6 0.0
416D Pine Flatwoods, oraminoid understOrY. disturbed 9.0 0.2
416E3 Pine Flatwoods, nraminoid understorv. 50-75% exotic cover 35,1 0.7
422 Brazilian Peooer (uoland) 36.7 0.7
434 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed 4.0 0.1
434 E3 2.2 0.0
512 Aoricultural canals 25.4 0.5
617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 1.3 0.0
618 Willow 16.2 0.3
618E2 Willow, 25-49% exotic cover 1.1 0.0
618E3 Willow, 50-75% exotic cover 8.0 0.2
619 Brazilian Peooer (wetland) 91.2 1.8
621 Cvpress 8.0 0.2
621E2 Cvoress, 25-49% exotic cover 0.2 0.0
621E3 Cvpress, 50-75% exotic cover 8.0 0.2
624E1 Cvoress-Pine-Cabbaae Palm 10-25% exotic cover 1.4 0.0
625 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods 6.8 0.1
625E3 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, 50-75% exotic cover 1.8 0.0
625E4 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, >75% exotic cover 1.7 0.0
630E4 Wetland Forested Mixed, >75% exotic cover 9.9 0.2
631 Wetland Shrubs and Brush 12.5 0.3
6310 Wetland Shrubs and Brush, disturbed 22.0 0.4
641 Freshwater Marsh 27.9 0.6
6419 Freshwater Marsh, Primrose Willow Predominant 1.8 0.0
6410 Freshwater Marsh, disturbed 1.5 0.0
641E2 Freshwater Marsh, 25-49% exotic cover 1.1 0.0
641E3 Freshwater Marsh, 50-75% exotic cover 0.5 0.0
641E4 Freshwater Marsh, >75% exotic cover 3.1 0.1
643 Wet Prairie 30.2 0.6
643D Wet Prairie disturbed 35.8 0,7
740 Disturbed Lands I Barren 0.7 0.0
8145 Roads and Hiahwavs, Graded and Drained 33.5 0,7
Total 4995.0 100.0
7/2312004. 1Jf>516 Ver 01'- MPERRY
,~
0378&0IJ..-OOO-PDRI-2fl.423
10-4
8C"~ ~
Table 10.1.B-2
Proposed Land Uses
FLUccS Code Land Use Approximate Percent of
Acres Total
120, 126 Residential, Medium Density, With or Without 2,921 58.5
Golf Course
1711 UniversTtVlSchools 995 19.9
100 Mixed Use 328 6.5
814 Roadwavs 242 4.8
170,830 Institutional (non-universitY) 211 4.2
524 Lakes 175 3.5
600 Wetland Preserve 62 1.3
180 Recreational (e.a., Parks) 61 1.3
Total 4,995 100.0
C. Briefly describe previous and existing activities on site. Identify any constraints or
special planning considerations that these previous activities have with respect to
the proposed development.
The site has been historically used for agricultural purposes, including land that is used
for purposes accessory to agriculture (e.g., access roads, perimeter berms, ditches,
staging areas, etc.). Existing agricultural activities are row cropping, sod farming, and
pastures. The Town site includes scattered lands with exotic vegetation, non-forested
wetlands, non-forested uplands, and forested wetlands, all of which exhibit a high
degree of disturbance. The RLSA Natural Resource Index establishes an index value of
1.2 or less as indicating no significant natural resource value. Following an intensive
verification analysis that included detailed FLUCCS mapping and listed species surveys,
it was determined that all 4.995 acres of land within the Town possess a Natural
Resource Index value of less than 1.2. This analysis affirms the intent of the RLSA
program to direct development to lands with relatively low environmental value, and is
consistent with the predominance of agricultural land uses, non-hydric soils, and the
lack of native habitats for listed species.
D. If the development is proposed to contain a shopping center, describe the primary
and secondary trade areas which the proposed shopping center will serve.
The Town of Ave Maria will include 690,000 square feet of retail space and 510,000
square feet of office space. This space will be distributed throughout the Town, but is
focused primarily within the Mixed Use designated areas. While not constituting a
shopping center in the traditional sense, the retail and office space will serve the same
purpose of providing neighborhood and community scaled goods and services. The
Town Centerrrown Core Area is designed as a pedestrian oriented mixed-use area with
a wide variety of retail, office, dining, civic and community uses. Other Mixed Use sites
to the east of the Town Center will offer sites for larger retail/office facilities which may
include shopping centers.
"'23/2004. 135516 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~,
03186-01J-OOO.-PDRf.-28423
10-5
8e
.~
,
The Town's residents and employees and the University's students, faculty and
administrative staff generate the demand for the retail and office space. To estimate the
required amount of space to provide, analysis was performed using multiple data
sources including Claritas, Inc. for local market area households and household income
data; consumer expenditure profiles from the U.s. Department of Labor Consumer
Expenditure Survey; and Urban Land Institute shopping center tenant profiles, square
footage requirements and average sales per square foot by store type from the
publication Dollars and Cents of Shoppinq Centers.
Collier County's RLSA policies require that a minimum of 65 square feet of building area
for community and neighborhood based goods and services be provided for each
residential dwelling unit within a Town. This equates to a minimum of 715,000 square
feet. and therefore the Town Plan meets and exceeds the minimum requirements of the
Growth Management Plan.
E. Describe, in general terms, how the demand for this project was determined.
In late 2002, Collier County had the privilege of being identified by the AMU founders as
the most desirable place in Florida to locate a new university. Collier County had
recently adopted the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) making it possible
to select a preferred rural location for the new university. Through the location selection,
planning and design of the university, it was determined that residential and non-
residential uses were necessary to support the University students, faculty and
administrative staff, The Town was planned and designed to support the demands
generated by AMU, as well as the meeting the requirements set forth in the RLSA
policies, including town size, number of residential units, retail and office square
footage, civic and institutional square footage and parks and open space.
The Town of Ave Maria is designed to create a new community, provide support
services and interact with the University such that both the University and the
surrounding new community each benefit from the new town development. The
provision of developable lands surrounding the formation of a new university is
necessary and appropriate to support the university demands for housing and services
and to provide an opportunity for residents of the integrated town to take advantage of
the intellectual and cultural environment created by the university itself.
While undergraduate students are required to live on campus. the university will require
off campus housing accommodating faculty, administrative staff, graduate students and
others affiliated with the university. Supporting retail and office services are also
required as described previously. In addition, the applicant believes that many new
residents will be drawn to the Town to live in close proximity to the intellectual
community created by the university and to take advantage of the educational, religious
and cultural offerings the University will provide. The Town also provides a new option
for residents who prefer to live in a rural location but seek the benefits of living in a small
town environment with the associated services and amenities. Without the RLSA, such
an option is not available in the rural district of Collier County as the only option under
the baseline land use regulations is 5-acre lot development.
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
c_,
03786-013-OOl}.PORI-28423
10-6
8e
I
j
Part 2 Consistency with Comprehensive Plans
A. Demonstrate how the proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive
plan and land development regulations. Indicate whether the proposed project will
require an amendment to the adopted local comprehensive plan, including the
capital improvements element. If so, please describe the necessary changes.
The Town of Ave Maria (The Town) will be developed according to the goals and policies
of the Collier County Growth Management Plan Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
Overlay and the RLSA Overlay District development regulations contained in Collier
County's Land Development Code. Amendment to the local comprehensive plan is not
required.
B. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in
the appropriate Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan.
The Town is consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan of the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council, dated April 2002. The goals and policies of the plan address
the following regional issues: affordable housing, economic development, emergency
preparedness, natural resources, and regional transportation.
Affordable Housinq
The Town will provide a wide range of single-family and multi-family units of varying sizes
and types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories.
Economic Develooment
The Town furthers Southwest Florida's economic goals of diversification. Ave Maria
University will be a new regional economic driver, and the Town will provide 1,200,000
square feet of retail and office space, generating significant numbers of new jobs in rural
Collier County.
Goal 11-6, Policies 7, 8, 9 and 11 require financial responsibility for infrastructure
necessary to support the project. The Town will pay impact fees to Collier County and its
residents will pay property taxes that will assist economic development in the County. An
independent Special District, known as the Ave Maria Stewardship Community District,
hereinafter referred to as "Special District" will provide a mechanism for the funding,
construction and operation of the Town's infrastructure. The applicant will also provide
right-of-way for the future improvements of Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road. Policy
4.17 of the RLSA requires that the fiscal self-sufficiency of the town be demonstrated
during SRA review.
The Town is consistent with all relevant economic development goals and policies of the
SWFRPC's Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
Emerqencv Preoaredness
The Town is located entirely within the Category 4/5 Zone on the Hurricane Storm Tide
Atlas and the applicant is exempt from providing responses to Question 23. The applicant
is coordinating with Collier County Emergency Management Department to explore
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 011_ MPERRY
,-
0378fl.-01:l-OOO-PDR\.2642J
10-7
'~8C
"
opportunities to provide emergency supply storage for the County, and hurricane shelter
for coastal residents.
Natural Resources
Goal 11-15, Policy 1, Goa11V-8, Policy 1 and Goa11V-2, Policy 2, state that wetland areas
should be protected, conserved and restored to maintain their value. Under Collier
County's RLSA policies, the Town will require the establishment of Stewardship Sending
Areas, of approximately 20,000 acres. These lands will be protected through the SSA
designations. The SSAs fulfill the intent of the RLSA program to entitle development
through the protection of areas with high natural resource values.
Goa11V~3, Policy 5 and Goa11V-6, Policy 7 requires adequate potable water and central
sewer systems. A private utility will be constructing and operating a central water and
sewer system to support The Town.
Reqional Transportation
Goal V-3, Policy 2 states that land use plans should provide an appropriate mix of land
uses to reduce unnecessary travel time. The intent of this policy is met by providing a full
range of uses within The Town, in a compact form, allowing for uses to be mixed both
horizontally and vertically.
Goal V-6 relates to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Town has been designed to be
pedestrian oriented, providing low-speed streets with sidewalks and an interconnected
system of trails that traverse through both the town and university. Many residents will be
located within a five to ten minute walk of the town center, and all residents will be within a
three-mile bike ride of the town center.
Goal V~12, Policy 6, explains that developments will be in conformance with area wide
transportation plans and participate in the elimination of expected adverse impacts on the
transportation system. The response to Question 21 demonstrates that the Town will be
consistent with this policy.
C. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in
the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.), including, but not limited to, the
goals addressing the following issues: housing, water resources, natural systems
and recreational lands, land use, public facilities, transportation, and agriculture.
Housinq
The Town will provide a wide range of single-family and multi-family units of varying sizes,
types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories The Applicant agreed
at the DRI pre-application meeting to work with the County regarding affordable housing in
the area.
Water Resources
New developments are required to be compatible with existing local and regional water
supplies. Consistent with this policy, a private utility will proVide water and wastewater
services to The Town. This goal also requires the protection of surface and
groundwater quality and the promotion of water conservation and water reuse
techniques. The quantity of water required for irrigation will be less than what is
712312~- 135516 Ver: 011- MPERRY
-,
0371\6.013-OQ{}.-PORI-28423
10-8
Be
;......,
,j
I
currently permitted and being used by existing agriculture. Appropriate best
management practices and techniques will be used in the Town, consistent with the
requirements of the South Florida Water Management District.
Natural systems and recreational lands
The State Comprehensive Plan encourages the protection and restoration of important
ecological systems. Through the RLSA policies and designation of the Town as an SRA,
a variety of valuable natural resources are protected on approximately 20,000 acres of
land under Stewardship Sending Area Easements.
Land Use
The Town of Ave Maria is the first Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) designation in
Collier County to utilize the sustainable principles set forth in the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area Overlay. The RLSA establishes stewardship principles and practices that address
three public interests - protecting natural resources. ensuring agricultural viability, and
promoting economic diversity while directing growth away from environmentally sensitive
areas. It is located on land where ecological analysis provided within the Natural
Resource Index Assessment indicates development suitability. Through the establishment
of the first Stewardship Sending Area and SRA, the Town promotes the three
cornerstones of the RLSA.
Public Facilities
Adequate fire, police and emergency services will be available to the Town. Required
impact fees and ad valorem taxes will be collected by Collier County to provide funding
for these entities.
Town utility services will be constructed and operated by a private utility company. This
will allow for financial self-sufficiency in providing a fiscally sound and cost-effective
mechanism to provide and maintain water and wastewater facilities.
Transportation
The State Plan requires the coordination of transportation improvements with the State,
Local and Regional plans. The Town will be consistent with the transportation provisions
of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the regional MPO plan.
AQriculture
The Town will provide for economic diversification of the rural Collier County agriculture
industry. SSAs that will generate the Credits for the Town protect and maintain
agriculture activities, both active and passive, on 20,000 acres of land under
Stewardship Sending Area Easements.
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: ot!- MPERRY
c_,
03786-013-000-PDRI-2S423
10-9
Bei
Part 3 Demographic and Employment Information
A. Complete the following Demographic and Employment Information tables.
Table 10.3.A-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Demographic Information
Persons K-12 Persons
Total Per Total Children Total K-12 65 + Per Total
Phase Dwelling Units Household Population per Children Household Persons
Household 65+
SF MF
1 3980 2030 2.2 13,247 0.22 1,305 0.74 4,453
2 2896 2094 2.2 11,034 0.22 1,182 0.74 4,032
Total 6876 4124 2.2 24,281 0.22 2,487 0.74 8,485
Source: Fishkind & Associates, Inc.. US Census Bureau, University of Florida BEBR
7/2312004.135516 Ver. 011- MPERRY
-
037/l6.-013-()OO.PDRI-28423
10-10
s::
0
Q.
<t>
~
III
c;;
~ III
"
<t> Q.
~ -i
III r-
'" ~ ~
<t>
S' mm
" 3 3
C "C"C -i
!!!. (")~~ ~
~ ::r33
'" <t> <t> <t>
" " "
<t> ,.. ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~mmmm~~~~......WWWWWNNNN~~~~~~
!1J~m_CJ)~~CDwo)_W_-_OO~Ut_W_O_C1J_C11_("J_N 0...... (11 NO...... (JI (.oJ N"" 0....... '" W -"" 0....... Ul NO....... C1'I N 0 CD 0
gg~gggggg~gggg~go~b~~~om~wb~bbab~b~b~b~bN~
oooooooooooooooo8gggogggg~ggggggggggggggg
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.....WWWWw~~~~____~~
O~~~~(ll)(ll)OOoo~.....................mmO)N~"""'.NO"""'.WN_~"""'.N_~"""'.N~"""'.N~~
~!1J~~~!1J~~9~~~9~~~.~.~.~.~~.~~.~wm~.~.~.~.~~
~.~.~.~.~.~~.~.N~~~~~w~~~~Ut~~~~.~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
i:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~~~~(ll)(ll)(ll)oo~.....................mm mO)~UtC1'lUt. ....WWWWWNNNN____~w
~"""'.N~"""'.N~......._~m N-C1JmW_~ .W-O(ll)m.NOOOo)W_(ll)mW_~=
~~~N~N~N~N.~N~.~N~N~~bN~b~m~Nbwm~N~N~N~N~
C1'IC1'IUtUtUtC1'l(1l(1lUt("J(ll)C1'I(JI(1IOOC1'lUtC1'lUt..............UtOUtW(ll)(1IC1IONN(1I(1IC1'IUt(1lC1'lC1'lUtN
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC1'lC1'lOOOOOOOO~
"
W "
co "
Coli
Cl "
. "
~
r-
."
"
"
"
"
"
10011000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
m
"
S';u
it..
" " -. it
Sl " " ~ =
" "
:.. " .... .... " ....
<n " ~ w " ~ - - ~ ~ w w -. ~ ~ .... ~ .... . ..... ~ ~
N " ~ ~ " OOOOOOOOOOO~~N~~~~ - .. 0 0 w - .- OIl W 0 .... ........ ~ ~ 0000 -
"'ll
.. ~~
" " -. ..
<n n _.
" " <t> 0
:" " ~ " "
~ " "':.. " - e!-
" i:;@ " 0 ~~~ ~. ~ w ~w t ~ ww - ~'" w w w . ~ ~~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ - - -
" 0 " ~ -. -....w 0- OIl ~~ '" ~. .... OIl. OIl 0 W OIl .... .... 0 - . 0 OIl'" . .... - w 000000
i:
>-' iir
n
0 et
I
r-' ~ ii
>-' " " "
" " g
" II
.. " ~w II W
.... " "'OIl II OIl -- -~ -~~ w~- -to. -to. -tl.... - - ..
'" II 0 -~ II ~ OOOOONW~""-J COOON~ ~ '" '" - "'-~ o~w '" c.oN~m-to. 0 - 0 ""-Jc.n-tl.~-tl.ooo
i:
!.
[
~ ."
II II "
" II n
" II :i
~ " II
" . '" II ~ is'
" 0 - 0 II 0 O-tl.N~-tl.-tl.-tl.-tl.-tl.--N-NN-to.WW~~W~.NNNN-tl.OO-tl.-to.-to.__OOOOOO ..
::&:
~ " " !
" II
" II
co " II
~ " ~ ~ II ~
" 0 ~ ~ II ~ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON--W~~~OONWNNNNWWWWWWNN-to.O
m
Q.
C
~ " II g
-
!!'> " II g'
" II
:t: " "'OIl II ~ e!-
" .... - II - - - - ~ - ~w w w ~ ..~ - w .~ ~ !Ii! ~ ~ w .~ ~ - -
'" " 0 ~. II . OO.....NNNW OIl 0 ~ w '" . '" 0 .... OIl ~ ~ w .... oo-w '" '" 000 .... - ~ ~ ~'" .... . 0 oo~
m!;>;u
3 " ~
t '2.";S;
II o ~
W II 12 <t>
0 - II - Sl."
-. :..,
~ ............ " - - - - -. i'
~ ... II . ~ ~ .~.... ~~ '" . ~~81~~ ~ OIl ~ ~ .... ~.... ~ ~ ag-
~~~ II ~ OOooooo--wmoo w - ~ ~~'" 0 0 w .... ~ .... - .0 w . 000
Z
mog
3 0 :l:I
"l:l "
-~rD
O2,,
~ II 1 -.
~ II Sl.Q.
~ II g' ~
u. w w w " w - [
OIl 0 ~ 0 " ~ - - - - - -- - - - ~ --
0 . . II ......_-to.-NWW~~ ....0 0 - ~ ~ ~ ~'" ~ .... w - '" ~c:oc:oco w- Q)c.nU'l""-Jcnc.n~WNOOO
~>-3
< PI
.. t1
i:....
!, ro
III
;Jl6
~ w
"';1>
I
~
m
3
"C
0"
1
"
-
~
'"
..
c
m:
::I.
0-
C
~
o'
"
en
C':)
.....
o
I
.....
N
~
'"
"0
~
...
'"
N
<.n
00
o
~
'"
~
III
CO
'"
S'
'"
c:
!!!.
~
CO
'"
;:
o
0-
'"
iil
..
III
'"
0-
r--i
'" 0
III Iii
mm
3 3
"0"0
O~~
::r33
'" '" '"
~aa
w "
co II
-= II
0"
.... "
N"
G) II
:.. II
~ II
~ ~
Nlil
mo
~ II
~ II
.... "
.. "
.... "
~N
<..J-o
........
0....0
.t II
"
Cl "
... "
N"
........
~'"
000'"
i "
"
. "
.. "
~ II
- "
~ ~
~....
o~o
l'>~ "
"
"
.. "
"'''' "
"
"'N
00
000
~"
~Q II
t "
Nil
~ ~
(,)(C
....N
0....'"
w_w w
000000
'" '" '"
OON
"'''''''
0000'"
'" ., ....
"-
........................................................................................................................
~~~~~~mm~~~~mm~mm~~~~......WWWWWNNNN~~~~~~
J:J)~(J)_w~~CO~C1J~w_.....~OJ~Ut~w_OJ>>_U'l_W_N 0"""" CJ'l NO......, c.n W N....Jl. 0....., Ul to,)... 0......, CJ'l No...... U'I N 0 co 9
gg~ggg~gg~gggg~~b~b~~~bm~~b~bbc"b~b~b~g~bN~
ooooooooooooooooggggoggggogggggggggggoggg
~ ~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~ -
.....~~~~~*~~~~~**~~~U'lCJ'l~UlCJ'l.~...WW~WWNNN~....Jl.....Jl.__*~
~~....~~....~~~....~~....~~....~~9""~~""'NW.~~~~~~~~~C:~(c~;~~~~~~~~~~
- ~ - - - -- - ~~~~~W~~~~U'I~~~~.~~~~~~~ww
~~~m~~~~~~~~m~~mw~~~wm~ww~~~~w~~w~~~w~ww~
~
..............................~...~...~~......~...~~~...~~......~......~~~~............... ~
"'''''''.,OOOOOOOO................'''''''''''''''''''''''''''........................''''''W''''''NNNN~~~~~~
~......,.N~.......Nw...........Jl.Wm.N-OJ(J)W....Jl.wC1J.W....Jl.Omm.NOOJ(J)W....Jl.OJ(J)w_~_
~~N~N~N~N~N~~N~~~N~N~~bNWb(cc,,~Nbw~~N~N~N~N~
~_CJ'lCJ'lCJ'lCJ'lCJ'lU'lU'lU'lCJ'lWCOU'l~~OO~~~~~~~O~W~~~ONN~~~~~~~~N
~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~OOOOOOOO~
"''''
"''''
"
"
"
II~ ~~~
II~oooooOOOOOOOOOOO~Nw~~~o~~m~.wommN~.~N
"
II ~
II W
" 00
" 0
00000000000')
~Nw~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~NOO
"
II N
II b
" ....
" 0
~~ ~
~m.~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~mg~~~~~~~~~~~~OOOO
~
iii'
"
~
Oi
" ::I
" ~
" 0
ll~ ~ NNNNNWWN~~~NN~~~~~~ ~
II~OOOOONW~~~~~~NW~OW.~w~.~~~~~w~w.mOlwmm~_oo
~
It
[
...,
" ~
" "
II ~
II ~ ~ _ _ as'
IIOO-N~OO~~NNNww.~N~m~O~wOO')..~~.NWWWNN~~OOOO~
"
"
"
" N
II 0 ~--NN~
IIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~wW~~~~~~wwmm~~o~~oo~~~wo
B!
c:
&
0'
10 -. ~ ::J
~OOON.~~OW~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~
"
II -
"
"
"
"
II w
II Co
" '"
" 0
~-'-N~WW -'~~NN--~__
~~"'o.~NOW~-....~~O~.~N~~~~-N~N~o,).~_
QOOOOO-NwmNm mmOl-m. .N~~o ~~-~~~~O~O-y.-mN
"
"
"
" '"
II~ --~NNNNN-W~WWN.W -NNNN_~
11~-NNw~m~ONw.NN~~~N.v.mm~mm~~ON~~m~
~ ~ ~
NmW-C:OWNNNO
)>
,...
...,
m
::I
t;Q
il'~
-, iii'
::I _,
~ -
::I
~
"'II
g~
-, en
~ g'
e!.
I
m&>;Q
:; = m
1~iS:
~ l1 !
ii g' cr.
::I III
~ -
z
mOO
:; g ::I
"0 en ;lg
{~i
~ -'!
~gm':
)>
<
..
~
III
ij'
~
81
..
N
>-3
III
0-
f-'
ro
.....
o
w
:t>
I
N
m
:;
."
f
..
1
'"
C
Iii'
..
::I.
"'"
c:
cr.
o
::I
'.,
CX)
~
8e
Part 4 Impact Summary
A. Summarize the impacts this project will have on natural resources.
No significant impacts to natural resources will result from the development of the Town.
Local, specific impacts to natural resources are addressed in these sections: Vegetation
and Wildlife (ADA Question 12), Wetlands (ADA Question 13), Water Resources (ADA
Questions 14 and 17) Soils (ADA Question 15), and Floodplains, Stormwater
Management (ADA Questions 16 and 19). More detailed information regarding these
resources may be found in each corresponding section of this document.
The Town site occurs within the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
overlay district, where compact forms of rural development are directed to lands with low
environmental value. Development within the RLSA must be entitled by placing legally
binding land use restrictions on lands with high environmental value. The Town is being
entitled by placing approximately 20,000 acres of environmentally valuable land under
easement restrictions that limit future land uses to agricultural and conservation activities.
Due to the site selection process that stressed avoidance of potential environmental
impacts, and the RLSA mandate to locate development in areas with low natural resource
value, overall impacts to natural resources will be minimal. It is worth noting that the Town
site was chosen for several specific environmental reasons:
. over 91 percent of the site is in active agricultural production and the remainder of the
site is utilized for support activities;
. native vegetation comprises only six percent of the total area;
. the native vegetation generally consists of isolated patches within farm fields and
along farm edges, and has been severely degraded by prior disturbance, invasive
exotic species, hydrologic alterations, etc.
. only 8.8 percent of the site contains SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands
. habitat for listed species is limited and generally of low quality
When considered in the context of net environmental impacts and benefits, the project
provides a significant net benefit to the environment. Impacts to isolated, disturbed, low
quality wetlands within an agricultural landscape will be mitigated through enhancements
to the large contiguous wetland systems outside of the Town boundary that borders Camp
Keais Strand, a regionally significant resource, and enhancement to wetland areas within
the Town. The entitlement of the project under the RLSA program will protect thousands of
acres of wetlands within environmentally sensitive areas from future development. These
environmentally sensitive lands also protect the existing landscape matrix of native
vegetation communities and agriculture, providing long-term conservation for a wide
variety of listed species, including the Florida panther, wood stork, various wading birds,
reptiles, etc. The RLSA program and the Town enjoy the general support of major local
environmental groups, who recognize that appropriately designed development is an
engine for environmental protection within the RLSA.
712312004- 135~16 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
~
0371'\6.{)13-CIOO-PDRI-28423
10-13
8e
,"",.-
B. Summarize public facility capital costs associated with project impacts using the
following table:
Table 10.4.B-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Public Facilitv Iml acts
Total Public Responsible
Facility Phase Capital Cost Entity
Transportation Phase 1 $14.9 m ,. Collier County & FOOT
Phase 2 $43.4 m1,2 (Off-Site)
Potable Water Phase 1 $0 Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP
Phase 2 $0 (private)
Wastewater Phase 1 $0 Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP
Phase 2 $0 (private)
Regional Parks Phase 1 $4.3 m 3 Collier County
Phase 2 $8.1 m 2.3
Community Parks Phase 1 $0 Self-provided
Phase 2 $0
Education Phase 1 $8.8 m "3 Collier Co. School District
Phase 2 $16.0 m 2,3 (not includinq private K-12 school)
Libraries Phase 1 $1.7m3 Collier County
Phase 2 $3.0 m 7,3
Jails Phase 1 $1.9m' Collier County
Phase 2 $3.5 m 2.3
Fire Phase 1 $4.1 m 3 Immokalee Fire District
Phase 2 $7.3m'2.3"
EMS Phase 1 $1.0 m' Collier County
Phase 2 $1.8 m2,3
General Government Phase 1 $3.0 m 3 Collier County
Phase 2 $5.4 m 7,3
Total $88.5 m 2
(Phase 2)
1 Costs based upon DRI proportionate share calculation methodology.
2 Costs are cumulative and include Phase 1 costs.
3 Costs based on estimated impact fees, applicant's analysis demonstrates that project's
impacts are less than impact fees, based on nature of project and self-provision of facilities,
7123f20Q4.- 135516 Va" 011- MPERRY
,-
037~13--{)()()"PDRI-28423
1 0-14
~ Be
QUESTION 11 - REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY
A. Project the funds anticipated to be generated by the project. This projection should
include any source or use of funds which could have any reasonable connection to
the proposed development.
1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in
which any construction and/or development takes place:
(a) Yearly ad valorem tax receipts
(b) Yearly impact fees collected
(c) Yearly sales tax received by local government
(d) Yearly gasoline tax received by local government
(e) Yearly projections of any other funds by any other sources generated
as a result of development of the proposed project within the region
The Town of Ave Maria will generate excess revenue over cost to Collier County. The
operating revenues generated by the Town are provided in Table 11,1.1 and include ad
valorem, sales tax, utility taxes, gas taxes, tourist taxes, permit fees and license fees.
These annual operating revenues are estimated to reach $13.4 million by 2010 and
$36.6 million at build out
Ad valorem revenues are projected in Table 11.1,1. The development program and
taxable value calculations are provided in Tables 11.2.1 and 11,2.2. The Town is
forecast to generate $4.77 million in ad valorem taxes by 2010 and over $15.1 million in
ad valorem revenue each year for Collier County at build out
Sales tax and tourist tax revenues are provided in Table 11.1.1 and calculated in Table
11.2.3. The Town is forecast to generate over $358,200 in sales tax revenue and
$51,700 in tourist tax revenue in 2010. At build out, sales tax revenue is expected to
exceed $842,793 and tourist tax revenue is expected to reach $188,000 each year for
Collier County.
Gas tax revenues are projected in Table 11.1.1. The Town is forecast to generate over
$1.2 million in gas tax revenue each year for Collier County at build out
Based on current millage rates, the School Board is projected to receive annual
operating ad valorem revenues of $3.5 million and capital ad valorem revenues of $1.4
million by 2010 (Table 11.1.1). At build out, operating ad valorem revenues will reach
$10.0 million and capital ad valorem revenues will reach $4.1 million per year.
2. List all assumptions used to derive the above projections and estimates,
show the methodologies used and describe the generally accepted
accounting principles used in all assumptions, estimates and projections.
The assumptions used in the revenue generation calculations are provided in Tables
11.2.1.through 11.2.5. Property taxes were calculated using 85 percent of the sales
7/2312004- 135516 Ver. 011- MPERRY
~~
03786-013.000-PDRI-28423
11-1
,
.
1
I
I
rac
-I
price, less the Homestead exemption (for 70% of single family households and 55% of
multifamily), and multiplied by the appropriate millage rate.
Sales taxes and tourist taxes were based upon projected sales. Additional assumptions
are located on Table 11.2.3.
Gas taxes, franchise fees, licenses and permits, fines and forfeitures and other revenues
were calculated using a per capita methodology. This methodology arrives at a per capita
amount for each revenue item in the County Budget. These per capita averages are then
applied to the projected new population.
1/2312004.135516 Ver: 01\- MPERRY
~
037~1J.-OOO.PDRI-28423
11-2
...
...
I
w
>
~
<
.
~
.
3
<;
~
~
.
!
~
,';
ri
.
~
RJ
"
~
"
~
"
~
"
~
N
~
~
'-'
~
~
"
~
~
~
i
"
'.
o
"
~
g
"
.
lIi
,~
o
.
>:
"
"
'"
~
~
m
~
~
.
.
~
J:i
.
':
;,
~
'~
~
':
~
'.
o
~
':
~
~
~
':
;,
~
;.
~
00
if
~
3
~
-I C"l 0 =
~~, ~ i
:; g ~ i
Co ~~ i
< < )> en
~ ~ ~ g
tD i !!!. 8
3 3 ~ _
N 3 2'
~ ~ a
~~
~
E
,
.
.
~
~
.
,
.
':
'~
~
o
~
~ ~
-~.
_ _ 0
"(I) J\J-:'"
. . -
. . .
':
'w
.
~
~
':~~
o ~
o 0
" N
"* ~-~
':
'"
"
N
"
.
o
~i':
"(.0 (n
o ~
.(N __.'"
00.
-~N
.. ~
':
'"
.
N
"
~
,!lIJ:l
.0.
jj ~.:5
~ ~ *
':
'"
w
o
'.
~
'e!):l
. . ~
. . .
. " w
"CIl ... 0.
8l -- ~
':
'~
.
'.
o
ii~
~ .
:... b
:j;! ~
':
.~
'"
.
o
"l!'~
.N~
~~OI
"l:;: ",,10
01 ;;; *
':
'w
-~
o
~I~
.l&> N.a>
- . .
t'J "" ~
~~~
':
'.
w
.
'w
8
':I~
o ~
NlO'"
. ~ 0
N ~.
~ ""'"lD
- ~
':
w
,';
~i&l
"8; f:s-~
NN.
~ ~ *
.
o
':
"
B
'~
.
.
':~~
-g ~ ~
_&:N
~ ~ $
w N .
~
,;
;,
o
. "
H
~ ~
ffi;~
~ t~ ~
;!ill
'iD ;:) ~
..~
~g~
~i,ll
- - ~
~~~
~ <5"t
000
~ ~- ~
~ :$ ~
~ 8 ~
" , r
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~-<
~ g ~
~ . "
~ "
.
~
~
.
E
.
Ii
Ol~~
:S ~_~
. . .
~ . W
N . "
I~
&l~~~..
~ ~ ~ t:Il ~
-.J 10 .... is .....
....., .... W -<0 0-
8 .... :i3 :s ;3
~
~
~~~
s: ~;;.l
~N.
~
:g~ ~
~ ~ i:i
- . 0
ll:. (AI "10
lO 0: ~
-
1Jm,,;:aO
~ ~ ;" ~
~~
-'-'
~ ~
~
~ -
~ -;;-::
(j.&: -~
0.00_
~ ~ ~
~
~~~
"N ~
~ N"
N N'W
g ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
w.
~ .",
. N
o 0
M~~
m~~
wiDe..
~ N"
~ o.
~ ~
" .
0."",
. N
o 0
~
~ M.OO
. ~ ~
"- -
\-..)0.'(."
" 0 ~
N ..
I~
~~_gi~~~.~
.... 0> N 0 2 ~ 12-<71
t:l :::l f2 g: 0 N <:Ii tj
I~
!:l~~~~
t!3 rx t!3 ~ ~
... l::l 01 lD ...
"...., 81 ~'S ~
ij .... (.0,1 0 0
~
foot tit;....
- ~ -
t; N ::
........ '0
[g 3::i
~
':
-~ &I
*~~~Hh
U*~~~g8~
I~
~~1:
(j ::: ~
."" ...."10
:s5 ::: 8
I~
':
:~~.!~~
wr~oo~
~
11 ~ ~ ~-~
t: ~;!);;: IJ
'"0....., N ty"tj
~ Cl (5 ~ '"
&l
~ ~-(XI
- ."
" . N
';;j" '~
.ON
~
!:l~~~~~~~
lO .... N ....8 . ~";e.
.:!:j18_g.l~ ww5
~~~~~~~~
I~
~~1:~iIl':
li3oo~t~~
~ ... -~ (.; -01:""
.~.~~~
I~
~In~:::
~ ~"S:l ~ '0
-...I _ ~ w .
-~~"~~~
I~
~
I~
~
~~~
:""'Wu.
p: ~ Cl
(Jl ~'o>
ill ~ ~
~
ill..
~ ~
~ -
tv@
~ ~
3
i'
~
.
!
.
.
S
n
g
Ii
IN
~
I~
~
~
I~
I~
~
I~
I~
I~
Ii
~~~f~.9~~~~~~~.R~~9b~O
~~~8ij~~~8IiiG~~~~~g<
~'''08.iII'a5;CD; ~-l::::UGliil.all-l~.;co~!
i~-l3~~l~~~~!~~g~~ZI~~
~ ~ ~ g ~ - ~ ~ "0 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ g 3 ~
~ia~Q~~~~R~~a r~~ c~t
g: QO if' ;;U if li ~ ~, R 1 ~.:::..... m' l'l ~ 'l' (\I 1Il )( ..
~ Q ~ ~ ~ : i ~ ~ i i .::: ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ i
i~~~ig0i ~ -~ i~a~e
o;-~] ~33 ": . ~q~ s
g ~~iw a ~ - QO_~o
~ ....~2'~ Q gu-iii'...,2.
~ ~ij [ lS:@~~f
. . ~i-~~Oo
.... ~ .. Q>-
- ~ ~ ..... c
.::: ~
~
.
i
o
l
it
~'
~
~
~
.
.
~
,.
)il
.
~
;~~ ~ ~
-~31t~~E~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~~ ~ t ~ -~ ~ ~ to ~ 11-~
OlNCOOO.....W-...l~W_........O_
-
"
..
.
'"
i
;U
-
.
"
"
.
Co
;:
~U~!i
01 01.......,01
~ -i: -8: gj ~
.... OD (;>010
lZ
..
~
..
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1:
~_~J~~,~
8:;:~~g
.... _ - 00 00
~
~
;.
ill
w
~
~
~
~~H~
~ 13:Z ~ g;
-
;;;
ili
,..
i
i~~
:~-:~!
:so:i;....OI
HH
-
Il
&
~
~
~~
o::::i
~.
"(;>:...
~~
~ ~ ~
N - ~
,liiii,gj
:t~e
S!!;
~ ~"
~8:g
N N.
~
~~N
IS ~ ~
-..I. t-'"
~ w S
~
t7l w
- 0
~~
" ~
i~iiE~~t1
~~~~-~-~-~~
~~tlE
-~ -R: ~ ~ ~
W . 00 .... 0
~~i
....~-....
~" ~
~
nil
- .
~ -g
" 0
~
!!:!"'{fl"" (It_I>.)
~~:j~~~~~~~
'.::;'''' i: i:: il" '-'~
~~'~~0l0_t::S~::j
~!l~t71f;1i
w~.......o",
e~"~"21~N
0> .. ... w . 0;
~
.,. f:It ~ M.,._W
~!\l"::::l~*"'''''Mt:l.
..,d,~~/:io~",t:l
i:_1li_..............-ffd5l~~-w
01 8.... lD 0> (0 S
""~"'........"" M ....~
lii"N"'~.-lii.~~~
... ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 0 (;> ~ ffi ~
S~~-g~-~..@"~-S~~~
~ i
~~
~
_..I. iIt {fl '" M
;t~itgJN
- '" '" ~ 00
. - - N-
~ ~ ::g ... '::J
<!SOlO> J\)(,Il
I ~ ~ ~
... ... ........ .,. - ""
5:! -fl:: '. '" ~ %! _"0..... tl
<=5~~~t;~~~~;t
~.~!~-~~~~~~
~ ~
~~~'!:'J!:IoIlI1M~"~
Q(gtial~~~:s:~w
~~!!HiiUH
-
N
,..
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ,.,~ ill tl1: ': ,. ': ii
?J~aiN~8:~~::jll)
~ -.... -..I. 0lU'.... w"li ~-...
(;i8:~~~g~w-..j~
~
.~ 1.! ~ 'S ~ M
~ rs 0 :i: gj ~
~~'t'~-~.~
II
~
~
!:
"
~ii
1:1
N
il
.
w
.
.
~
~.-
;j-
~~
:c,.-oo
-.
"~
~
~~~
~~~
~ ~
~.,. N tot.., _..I. ""
::i~~~~~~
"g: -w t '8"(0 '- W
.... :3 -.j w ~ 18 ~
~~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~
~ -0= ~-~ g '::j -al"~'8: ~ -". ~ ~ ~
W .... _ 0 N W . ~ OD Co W 0 ~ I>.)
1:1
..
::l
!
i~~
{; -~
.... (;j -.:
"g ~
. ~
1:1
..
~
~
!1
o
i ~ ~ ~
~NM-
w"... -", "':c-
ell 01.......
.N ....OIN
0> ....-.,.-"'0.
8~~:::Jm
II
~
~
..
i!
~~~
~~~
. . .
~ . .
_ . N
ii
1:l
.
~
i~1l ':
,.00 ....ll;-OI
~~;jZJ
II ~ ~~
~...._oo
II
':
l:
!
U
t~ ~
~~~ ~ ~ ~
g-$i!91~~~~~!i!;1i'f:~
(;>~<5>I>.)"l>.)ool>.)i2l1;:j-...loo
Q) io1:!"...J;...;, '0 '0 -:.., 01"" ~ '0:0-....
~.Nz.:~R:;:j~~.::lo;ag
~
!S-;
~$
~is
.~
':
I~~
~~~
~
ME~
~tvQo
m ~;t
~
~,-
~~
..
Olb
~ .
~.
':&1
. .
. N
'0 ......
- ~
N"
~'!:'J!S~11
~;l<~~
~~~~~
~
~~;lS~
0> N 10 OJ w
b......".. i-J <.n
;:j!S ~ t ~
.~ "" ....
Sl ~ - .... ~!'> f:It... ,- (It
al(j~~I>.)!g~~~
~"g:~-~.ltN81g-~-(,Il
-...IO>I>.)~W~"'ocn~
!!l~':l!
lCICIIIOl !:I>.)
-", <0 ii -0-"'"1
~:;: I>.) ;:j II
~'!:'J!S~~
~!:;lmfgl>.)
io 0 -iji;"';'"o
.... (Jl ". ~
W Cl 00.....
'" ~p:
~ 8i ~ ~ ~
~~~~~
~
11 ~~
.~ ~ t:l ~
........""'j.y
~ !?l ~ (j
~
lo'I'" ...._0
~~g~~
~ il ~;;'~
_ <D en .. <D
~ ~
e ~
H
~
~ -
~ -~ ~
"'" .
~ ~-~
~
~ w
~ ~ "" tv '.....
.~!:3 g: ~ ~
~*~~~
~lj
~ ~
.~ -E
~':
~i!~~
-~~~~~
':~
~ ri
.~ !:
" ~
~
~ ~
~~:tl
iD100l
it ;j ~
~
~ -
~t!~~b:
8l ~... :;: ~
.~._" ~ iI
... ~ c:;; 0 '"
~
.., tot ~,o.
::::i tl CfI w...
(;> -..j m ~ t:;
.~-~~~-~
;~
. .
-....'"
" .
. 0
~ n "
B~
!!!.i' ..
3';; ::
g ~
-~ -
~
Ii
I~
Ii
I~
~
~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
~
~
~
I~
co
CJ
~t
....
....
I
..
~
.
o
.
<
.
.
i
.
.
i
!1
o
,
.
m
.,
~
Gl ~ -:r;
~ ~ i. ~
~ b' g -
~ c I
~ ii -
.
~
o
&
" ~ b'
! 3
. 3
. .
m ~
it -
~ ~
~ .
.
.
.,
~
.
o
.
~
~
~
.~
w
~
'"
8
!:I
S
.~
'.
o
o
~
'"
~
"
o
o
~
'~
,
"
o
o
~
~ ::!:Ill
~ ~H
hl'l~H
~ ~
-~~
~<11 ....lQOI
-~~i:t
Ul'I~H
~~ "is~
r~~l'I~u
... tit....""
~~ H~
~~l'IH~
~
~
'm
~
i'i
o
1!1 !11111
N '-" ..... Q) 0
q ~~~
Ul'IHil
!1
'-
w
\j
.
..
8
1!1 !1::l11
N '" ..... w ""
~ ~ ~":; ~
8h~H
~
-~
-~
[3
1[1 liH
~ H~
h~H
!1
~
'.
~
~
.., M""....
~" ~~~
~LiU
!1
"
;
'"
N
.
'.
8
~ll ll~r
UJH
~
-~
"
~
'8
o
I!! Ui:
U .~~l!
8~1'I'8H
~
N
'0
~
'0
g
'8
o
1[1 sH
N~ ~~g
Ul'l~H
~
N
"
.
.
"
g
'8
o
I(l ,,~~
1_ 5N~
U H8
Ul'IH'8
~
N
"
~
II
o
'8
o
!!! sU
~~ ~~~
Ul'I~H
~
N
"
~
'8
o
"
8
~[1 sU
~tn~
.
~~~
c c
~~h
-133 ."
a~-?~
-~ .:
~ p
!!l."Tl
i1~
. g
!l!.~
~
.
o
.
<
.
~
~
~ E i
~ -~ ~
NON
hH
II ~ ~
~H
i: ~ 8
ON,
hH
1: ~ 1:1
ii:l ~ ~
W -.........
N ~.
, N"
hH
~ U
-0 :.. w
_ 0_
. N N
.0 0. 0.
:5 ~ [5 g
t: ~ ~
;j &'l g
~ -~"it;
.... ...._0
~Il'IH
!! ~ ~
~ ~ 15:
-::5 -lil8
'" '.
hlHi ~
~
~ ~
~ g ~
~ b:";:!
, ,0 I~~
hH _
~ M \II
~ S ~
"cl ~~
N ,"
hH ~
:~~.~ ~
o . g
~8~~ I~
!1 ~
nH
du I~
~ ~
~~H
du I~
i~~~
..... 0 -..l (..l
~~~~
UH I~
E! ~ j;
~ .... 8
~ ~*
~8~.g ~
E!:gj;
~ !:j 8
-t; ."" ~
'" ,~,~ I~
8 ~ 8 ~
., 0 ...
p~
t ' ..
"II g N
i i..l
~
i
.
I~
~
I~
~
I~
~
~ ~
~ ~
H
~. c
~ ii
.~
~, ~
g~
o
]'
~
N
L
N
~~
,
8 ~
,
~~
N
,
'81:
N
,
~t;;
N
"
h
N
,
~ffi
N
,
'^
8 ~
N
,
'.
8 ~
N
,
'^
8 ~
N
,
..
8 ~
N
,
"~ ~
,~
g m
O.
,~
h
i
~
]'
~
'~
.
~
N
"
,
~
"
;;,
N
'"
.
N
10
~
N
'g:
,m
t
,.
~
'.
~
.
i:
.
b
;;j
.
'm
.
.
"
~
.
'a:
N
~
.
~
"
;
.
..
~
.~
.
m
'.
~
~
.
h
~
'8
o
m
'"
~
.~
.
'~
~
'8
o
,m
~
~
~
"
~
!
'"
o
o
o
o
o
o
i!
i!
~
o
8
s
o
8
.
8
8
8
"
i
~
m
it
u
~.
~
]'
~
~
~
o
.
'"
8
~
o
g
~
o
~
~
"
8
~
,
'8
~
N
'8
8
~
.
,
.
'N
8
m
.
.
~
m
~
'8
o
m
~
'8
o
m
~
'8
o
~
'8
o
.
~
'8
o
.
.
m
'8
o
~
'8
o
~
m
~
z
<i~
U
if ~
]' 0
~ ~
-~
.
c
,
~
~
~
,
.
'0
o
~
i
~
'"
8
~
"
8
~
'"
8
*
'"
o
o
.
~
'"
8
.
,
.
~
.
o
,
'0
8
.
.
.
'8
~
'8
o
...
~
"
m
I
i
a
>
~
'"
"
.
~. ~ ~ l;:
~! ~ I
t-i'~n
(l -< ~
~ "
~ ~
i
~
'"
s
o ~ ~
'g
o g"~
N
"
.
o
oU
.
"
~
o
~{;;
, -
000
,m
g
. .
---I.W
m ,
000
m
'~
o
N.
iJil
000
"
8
N'
a~~
,
*
~ .
-~ .~
000
~
'~
o
. m
....wo.
. , -
000
,0
o
Ci
. m
g -(1'>-.....
. N
o 0
::
. m
....:..-0>
m N ~
o ~ m
~
~
~ m
.,.:"00
m N,
o. m
'8
~ m
....-.....-011
m N ,
o . .
::
. m
.:"'0.
m N ~
o. m
~
~
~ m
....:..00
m N,
o. m
c
,
~
en
! g
- ~
n
o
a~
W
.
,
~
>
I
c
3
f
I~
I~
~
I~
l~
~
I~
I~
I~
I~
~
~
\~
~
~
"
CD
C"':)
f-"
f-"
I
(Jl
it ~ ~ if iH' b ~i
C: CD =I; CD I'D ::J Ai I'D C
m"''''--i/i-Ih3
~"Og~~ Glo
;:o~ ::JQ..C1l~~-t:O'
11.... a. 6 iiJ >< ([l Q) :::lI
e!. g en ::l (Q ""C 3 Q.. en
-~"O ....3~
g> Q. ~ ~ J( ~ .. ~"
" iii'm~'~;l...
1]; :;;3i-~~
.p CD C1l.... - a.
::0 "'!!!..:;o G) 0
. g>.'" 8 ,,""
c: iil 3 ~ 8
" - ~
/Ij!i g
a
cr
~
~
iil
!<
l!l
'"
!l.
~
~ ~ :5
N ~ '" c:
~ffitll~~~~~
__ _____ m
:!1:!!;r:!!:!!~~
~~".~~<O<O
c: 2S': c: 2!: 2S': CD (D
a.~a.a.a.-"'"
Qo l1l CD CD CD fi? ~
[~. UHl
m m Q) Q) 3 3
,is' iiltrol1l CI)
m----aa
it --
,'"
~
a'
5'
o
~
ii
f;>
;l.
'"
!l.
(fl
;:s-
o
"0
"0
5'
<0
f;>
~
.0
~
~
...
i!l
...
~
if
ii
"
Ii
~r""'s:!
a2i::li!l
!i!!.. e!.. () ::I.
~.a'~ I
~.15'0 !l
<T~~~
O~ 0-' 0
_. <T
~!!1-e
o 6' 0
rs.:J-
o 0'0 ~
~~.g><
Gl c:!I!
o ~:l
;; ~ ~
~ ~
-
'"
tll
rn
IV
'" '"
tll tll
~~~
'"
~
:..,
1;1
'" '"
~ ~
~ ~
~I~~
'"
~
:..,
1;1
'" '"
~ ~
@rs@
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
~ ".Clo-
~llS ~
~
~
'" ...
~ ~
~~~
~
~
... ...
~ ~
~I~~
~
~
....
g:
....
~ ~
N N
~rs~
~
~
....
~
i i
-..... :...
g} IlS g}
~
~
....
~
'" ...
g ~
~~~
...
~
's!
IV
'" ...
~ ~
'hl~
~
8l
~
IV
~ ~
'"......J ~
ffi~ffi
~
8l
~
IV
~ ~
IV IV
.....,. "....,J
ffillS ffi
~
8l
~
IV
! !
.... ....
ffillS III
...
~
8l
~
IV
... ~
~ IV
~ ~
lll~ffi
~
8l
'0
~
IV
~ !
:.., ....
ffillSffi
~ i if.~Uili
i::l ~ ;;;::!!!!.~"'''
" "'" ~i!lm'i'-8m
~_ ... ..~ 03;l.
'" ~ ~g>!!.
",?II g> " ~"
)( if (I) ~
ill ..
~ ;l.
o
~
0'
g>
c:
;>
~ !a 1=
l'! ~ 8l "'lli~
~ ,""...... tl...... CJ)
Sl ~ ~~lS~~~
... '"
~ ~ .....~~
~ ~ ~ ~8~
~ ~ ~~lS~f~
... '"
... 1C i!'; ...",~I!l
~ ~ $ ~~:..,~
.... co ~ . ;j ~j:l
'~ m ~lS~~~t
&'l t;; ~ &'It;;
&'l W _01 ~&'l."""Jv
~ ~ & .81S~iil
~ ~ ~lS~~f~
'" '" J/!
~ ~~ ~iIII~~~
~ ~ ~ .81S~~
~ ~ ~lS~~~~
i ~"'~~
~ ~~~1l
l:llSwtU
... ...
&'l 0: &'l &t......8
~ ~ ~CJ)&'li~~:...
to W ~~. ......c;;~
~ ~ ~:e:~m1l1~
f\,) ....,. .....C!S ......c,)t-..)
'"
... .(]I
l!l -
~ ~
~ ~
... '"
~... ~
&'l ~ _~iI't~;&'l~_W
~ .~ ,~,~.~.~.~,~
~ ~ ~8w!U~
... ...
~... ~
w w ,I!l",~...tl,~
8 ~ 8i~.(jj~~8
~ 8 ~'8~~~~
'" '"
&'l 0; &'l tI't......
i ~ ~~j~~~
~ ~ ~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" ~
~~~~..P;~~
t~.(jj~~~
~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" ~
.Sl",~~~.81
t ~.(jjtll~~
~~~~@~
'" '"
~ '" ~
.Sl ",~~~.81
t~.U!tll~~
~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" ~
.Sl ",~~~.81
t ~.(jjtll~~
~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" ~
Sl",.IV~ll:81
~~.~tll~'~
~~~~~~
'"
'" co
~ ~
i ~
...
ill ~
.~ N
1B ~
'"
'" co
~ ~
i ~
'"
ill !O
~ ~
i ~
'"
'" ,co
~ ~
~ ~
if ~ 6' "'1<
~..='d;~
... 5-:::-8 ..
16" IT1
Q.l~3;a
! .!!!.~
1: 5"
" 3
;> ~
;l.
]"
;,.
OO~~ Ii
~
o 0 ~i I~
-
~-.. INi
o ..............wo
"'o~
o ~ ~~ I~
o~=.~ I~o
08
~~ INq.
o ~o~ =
~ t
~ ~ ~~ I~
~ ~ ~~ I~
~ (]I
~el~~ I~
~el8~ I~
~el8'~ I~
~el8~ I~
~el8~ I~
~el8-~ I~
~el8~ I~
iI'~'"
ih'i
...~~
~o-
)C ~ N
~~ ...
[
i!
!l
co
CJ
Table 11.2.4
Collier County
Fiscal Impact Assumptions
Taxable Assessment Ratio
Homestead Exemption
% Single-Family with Homestead
% Multifamily with Homestead
85% (From Property Appraiser's data
$25,000
70% (From Property Appraise~s data
55% (From Property Appralse~s data
~
Coilier County
Unincorporated
Fire & EMS
Water Poliution Control
3.6772 Milis
0.6069 Mills
1.5000 Mills
0.0347 Mills
Cnty Population-Working Residents
Cnty Population-Nan-Working Residents
County Population (total)
(FI Population Studies, Jan '00)
County Employment (total)
(State of Florida ES-202, Q3, 2000)
Equivalent
Factor
0,7619
10000
Full-Time
Ecuivalent
61,604
170 069
251,693
107,366
170,069
277,457
107,368
0,2361
25,564
Persons per Household
2.21 (FI Population Studies, 2002)
Total Households
113,664 (FI Population Studies, 2002)
Hotel Assumctions
Average Occupancy
Average Persons per Room
42.5%
12
Emolovment Assumctions
General Office & Medical
Retail
Restaurant.Sit Down
Restaurant-Fast Food
Hotel
Golf Cou rse
Golf/SwimlTennis Club (sq.ft.)
Muitifamily-ACLF (beds)
Institutional/Government (sq ft)
Movie Theater
~
216 sq. ft, per employee
496 sq. ft, per employee
400 sq. ft. per employee
150 sq. ft. per employee
0.50 employees per room
40 per 18-hole course
300 sq. ft. per employee
0,3 per bed
936 sq. ft. per employee
500 sq. ft. per employee
Students
Total
Students per Household
37,645 (School District)
0.2261 (independent study)
Value Assumotions
Single-Family
Single-Femily
Single-Family
Single-Family
Multifamily
Multifamily
Multifamily
Multifamily
Multifamily-ACLF (beds)
Office (sq,ft.)
Office Medical (sq.ft.)
Retail & Entertainment
Hotel (per room)
Golf Course (holes)
Golf/SwimlTennis Club (sq.ft.)
Pro iect Data
$195,000 (Developer)
$225,000 (Developer)
$400,000 (Developer)
$195,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$125,000 (Developer)
$60,000 (Developer)
$83 (Developer)
$125 (Developer)
$90 (Developer)
$100,000 (Developer)
$333,333 (Developer)
$75 (Developer)
11-6
CX>
CJ
Table 11.2.6
Collier County Budget FY 2002
FY 2002
General Special Debt Per Capita
fl!nlj !W:!!lY! ~ Total All Fund. Amount
311000 Ad Valorem Taxes $125,356,266 $21,566,639 $626,260 $147,753,367 Calculated (1)
312100 Local Option Sales, Use and Fuel Taxes $11,166,732 $11,166,732 $39.33 (1)
312300 County Nlnth-Cent Voted Fuol Tax-Sales $506,400 $506,400 $1.79 (1)
313500 Cable Television-Franchise Fees $3,163,106 $3,163,106 $11.19 (1)
314200 Telecommunications-Utility Sevices $1,263,609 $1,263,609 $4.44 (1)
321000 Occupational Licenses $1,542,626 $1,542,626 $5.42 (1)
322000 Building Permits $10,775,593 $10,775,593 $37.69 (1)
329000 Other Licensos, Permits, Fees $173,240 $470,466 $643,726 $2.26 (1)
331200 Public Safety-Federal Grants $299,766 $3,577,573 $3,677,359 $13,63 (1)
331500 Economic Environment-Federal Grants $2,507,427 $2,507,427 $6.62 (1)
331690 Human Services-Federal Grants $6.665 $245,964 $254,649 $0.90 (1)
333000 Federal Payments In Uu Of Taxes $619,491 $619,491 $2.16 (1)
334200 Public Safety-State Grants $2,303,659 $2,303,659 $6.10 (1)
334390 Other Physical Environment-State Grants $635,901 $635,901 $2.24 (1)
334490 Other Transportation-State Grants $1,926.446 $1,926.446 $6,76 (1)
334500 Economic Environment-State Grants $2,634,921 $2,634,921 $9.26 (1)
334620 Public Welf8ro~Stete Grants $166,669 $166,669 $0.66 (1)
334700 Culture/Recreation-State Grants $947,563 $947,563 $3.33 (1)
334900 Other State Grants $3,517 $3,517 $0.01 (1)
335120 State Revenue Sharing Proceeds $6,460,625 $349.000 $6,609.625 $27.03 (2)
335130 Insurance Agents Licenses $96,600 $96,600 $0,36 (2)
335140 Mobile Homo Licenses $96,716 $96,716 $0,36 (2)
335150 Alcoholic Beverage Licenses $136,434 $136.434 $0.55 (2)
335160 Pari-Mutuel Distribution Replacement $113,700 $332,600 $446,500 $1.77 (2)
335160 Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax $23,447,549 $3,163,900 $26.611,449 $105.65 (2)
335490 Other Transportation~State Shared $16,691 $16,691 $0.07 (2)
335500 Economic Environment-State Shared $33,930 $33,930 $0.13 (2)
335700 Culture/Recreation-State Shared $35,446 $35,446 $0.14 (2)
337100 General Government Shared $196,051 $196,051 $0.76 (2)
337500 Economic Environment-Local Grants $69,947 $69,947 $0.36 (2)
341100 Recording Fees.-Chargos for Services $3,097,126 $3,097,126 $10.69 (1)
341200 Internal Services Fees and Charges $1,772,074 $340,963 $2,113,057 $7.43 (1)
341550 Supervisor of Election-Charges for Services $27,061 $27,061 $0.10 (1)
341600 County Officer Commission and Fees $635,294 $635,294 $2.94 (1)
341900 Other General Government Charges and Fees $329,351 $1,650,697 $2,160,246 $7.67 (1)
342300 Housing for Prisoners-Charges for Services $16,900 $16,900 $0.07 (1)
342500 Protective Inspections-Charges for Services $13,061 $13,061 $0.05 (1)
343700 Conservation and Resource Management-Physical Environment-Charge~ $66,390 $66,390 $0.31 (1)
343900 Other Physical Environment Charges-Physical Enviroment-Charges for S $563,062 $563,062 $1.96 (1)
344900 Other Transportation Charges-Transportation-Charges for Services $51,636 $51,636 $0,16 (1)
346400 Animal Control and Shelter Fees-Charges for Services $127,649 $37,164 $164,633 $0.56 (1)
347200 Parks and Recreation-Charges for Services $6,075 $1,102,994 $1,109,069 $3.90 (1)
347900 Other Culture / Recreation-Charges for Services $696,767 $1,256,651 $1,955,636 $6.66 (1)
346110 Filing Fees-County Court Criminal-Court Related Revenl $36,160 $36,160 $0.13 (3)
346120 Service Charges-County Court Criminal-Court Related ~ $341 ,976 $341,976 $1.23 (3)
346210 Filing Fees-Circuit Court Criminal-Court Related Revenu $160,790 $160,790 $0.56 (3)
346220 Service Charges-Circuit Court Criminal-Court Related Rl $146,612 $146,612 $0.53 (3)
346230 Court Costs-Circuit Court Criminal-Court Related Reven $246,270 $246,270 $0.69 (3)
346410 Filing Fees.Circuit Court Civil-Court Related Revenues $325 $325 $0.00 (3)
346420 Service Charges-Circuit Court Civil-Court Related Rever $1,147,609 $1,147,609 $4.14 (3)
346520 Service Charges-Traffic Court (Criminal and Civil)-Court $224,169 $224,189 $0.61 (3)
346530 Court Costs-Traffic Court (Criminal and Clvil).Court Rela $30 $30 $0.00 (3)
346720 Service Charges-Pro bate-Court Related Revenues $165,776 $165,776 $0.60 (3)
349000 Other Charges for Services-Other Charges for Services- $6,260,603 $710,806 $6,971,609 $24.51 (1)
351000 Judgments and Fines-Fines-Fines and Forfeitures $3,635,526 $429,736 $4,265,266 $15.37 (3)
354000 Violations of Local Ordinances-Flnes-Fines and Forfeitul $56,960 $125,726 $182,666 $0.66 (3)
359000 Other Fines and/or Forfeitures-Other Fines and Forfeitur $1,461,352 $162,631 $1,664,163 $6.00 (3)
361000 Interest~lnterest gnd Other Earnings~lnterest and Other I $6,676,757 $2,265,040 $539,955 $11,703,752 $41.15 (1)
343100 Special Assessment/Impact Fees $1,943,144 $195,212 $2,156,356 $7.59 (1)
364000 Disposition of Fixed Assets-Sales-Safes $41,129 $437,260 $476,389 $1.66 (1)
365000 Sale of Surplus MaterIals and Scrap-Sales-Sales $700 $700 $0.00 (1)
366000 Contributions and Donations from Private Sources-Conti $77,447 $151,679 $229,126 $0,61 (1)
369000 Other Miscellaneous Revenues-Other Miscellaneous -M $5,694,482 $665,363 $15,247 $6,575,112 $23.12 (1)
361000 Interfund Transfers In-Non-operating~Other Sources-TrE $1,427,077 $9,695,969 $9,076,135 $20,401,201 $71 .73 (1)
363000 Install Purchases Proceeds/Capital Leases~Proceeds-Other Sources $26,547 $26,547 $0,10 (1)
364000 Debt Proceeds-Proceeds-Other Sources $3,626,929 $16,297,956 $21,924,665 $77.06 (1)
390000 Depreciation on Fixed Assets Acquired with Contrib~Proprietary Non-Oper $0 $0.00 (1)
Total $193,907,105 $91,366,590 $33,308,665 $318,604,560 $1,120.16 (1)
Balancing Revenue (automatic calculation if needed) $0 $0 $18,493,168 $18,493,168 $65.02 (1)
Total Net of Capital Revenues $193,907,105 $65,796,515 $14,615,697
11-7
CX>
C"J
-
Table 11.2.6
Collier County Budget FY 2002
FY 2002
General Special Oebt Per Capita
El!l!l! BlwIl!! .bWS! Total All Funds Amount
EXDenditures
511 Legislative-General $745,909 $745,909 $2.62 (1)
511 Legislative-General $79,724 $79,724 $0.26 (1)
512 Executive-General $663,656 $663,656 $2.33 (1)
512 Executive-General $26,333 $26,333 $0.10 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $15,673,616 $57,691 $15,931,507 $56.01 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $5,790,544 $14,997 $5,605,541 $20.41 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $4,236,976 $2,996 $4,241 ,974 $14.91 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $2,072,471 $2,072,471 $7.29 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $232,134 $232,134 $0.62 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $2,652 $2,652 $0.01 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $102,661 $4,119,051 $4,221,732 $14.64 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $97,036 $1,039,747 $1,136,765 $4.00 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $5,740 $42,506 $46,246 $0.17 (1)
517 Debt Service Payments $33,304,069 $33,304,069 $117.09 (1)
519 Other General Government $7,533,467 $1,532,629 $9,066,296 $31.66 (1)
519 Other General Government $5,767,666 $3,729,704 $9,497,372 $33.39 (1)
519 Other General Government $930,915 $652,607 $1,763,722 $6,27 (1)
519 Other General Government $1,610,293 $42,459 $1,652,752 $5.61 (1)
521 Law Enforcement $63,773,512 $5,195,633 $66,969,345 $242.46 (1)
521 Law Enforcement $12,653,156 $2,091,666 $14,945,026 $52.54 (1)
521.6 Law Enforcement. Capital $4,361,175 $735,681 $5,116,656 $17.99 (1)
522 Fire Control $1,126,553 $1,126,553 $3.97 (1)
522 Fire Control $534,178 $534,176 $1.66 (1)
522.6 Fir. Control. Capital $40,176 $40,176 $0.14 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $6,964,232 $6,964,232 $24.46 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $3,236,533 $3,236,533 $11 ,39 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $622,427 $622,427 $2.19 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $347,466 $46,465 $393,953 $1.39 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $47,530 $625,602 $673,332 $2.37 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $11,646 $134,207 $145,655 $0.51 (1)
527 Medical Examiners $713,330 $713,330 $2.51 (1)
529 Other Public Safety $817,031 $617,031 $2.67 (1)
538 Water/Sewer Services $391,254 $391,254 $1.36 (1)
536 Water/Sewer Services $31,477 $31,477 $0.11 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management $1,969,737 $1,969,737 $8.93 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management $676,339 $131,622 $610,161 $2.65 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management-Capital $47,104 $520,423 $567,527 $2.00 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management-Grants $0 $0.00 (1)
536 Flood Control/Slormwater Control $15,555 $15,555 $0,05 (1)
539 Other Physical Environment $1,660,526 $1,660.526 $6.54 (1)
539 Other Physical Environment $10,116 $6,415,023 $6,425,139 $22.59 (1)
541 RoadfStreet Facilities $8.273,391 $6,273,391 $29.09 (1)
541 Road/Street Facilities $6,079,618 $6,079,616 $5,62 (1)
541.6 Ro.cVSueetFac"U/e~ $4,151,652 $4,151,852 $14.80 (1)
544 Mass Transit $2,053,764 $2,053,764 $7.22 (1)
553 Veterans Services $169,466 $169,466 $0.75 (2)
553 Veterans Services $17,257 $17,257 $0,07 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $199,115 $513,712 $712,627 $2.63 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $92,652 $185,527 $276,179 $1.10 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $3,669 $530,609 $534,476 $2.12 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $342,637 $4,556,768 $4,699,623 $17.23 (1)
562 Health $80,265 $60,265 $0.24 (2)
562 Health $1,344,444 $1,344,444 $5.34 (2)
562 Health $612,904 $612,904 $2.43 (2)
562 Health $1,109,605 $1,109,605 $4.41 (2)
563 Mental Health $928,100 $926,100 $3.66 (2)
584 Public Assistance $327,011 $418,015 $743,026 $2.95 (2)
564 Public Assistance $3,107,496 $224,551 $3,332,047 $13.23 (2)
564 Public Assistance $14,131 $14,131 $0.06 (2)
569 Other Human Services $149,093 $149,093 $0.59 (2)
5S9 Other Human Servic.. $19,152 $19,152 $0,06 (2)
569 Other Human Services $32,500 $32,500 $0.13 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $4,944,014 $415,750 $5,359,764 $21.26 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $309,219 $976,593 $1,265,612 $5,10 (2)
572-6 Parks/Recreation $71,167 $1,047,104 $1.118.271 $4.44 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $2,136,753 $11,754,656 $13,693,409 $55.16 (2)
573 Cultural Services 159239 $159,239 $0.63 (2)
579 Other Culture/Recreation 420188 $420,188 $1,67 (2)
579 Other Culture/Recreation $309,624 $309,624 $1.23 (2)
561 Interfund Transfers Out $39,325,236 $6,067,619 $4,776 $45,417,633 $159.66 (1)
11-8
......r'.~
ex>
C"':)
Table 11.2.6
Collier County Budget FY 2002
FY 2002
General Special Debt Per Capita
flI!ll! Revenue im1s! Total All Funds Amount
590 Other Non-Operating Disburnments $1,058,617 $1,058,617 $3,72 (1)
604 Clerk of Court Administration $630,531 $630,531 $2.27 (3)
604 Clerk of Court Administration $179,135 $179,135 $0.65 (3)
604 Clerk of Court Administration $29,771 $29,771 $0.11 (3)
608 Jury Management $77,774 $77,774 $0,28 (3)
608 Jury Management $6,886 $8,886 $0.02 (3)
608 Jury Management $2,059 $2,059 $0,01 (3)
611 Court Administration $24,483 $24,483 $0.09 (3)
611 Court Administration $8,299 $8,299 $0.03 (3)
612 State Attorney $138,500 $138,590 $0.50 (3)
613 Public Defender $125,375 $125,375 $0.45 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $677,249 $677,249 $2.44 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $43,956 $43,956 $0.16 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $7,796 $7,796 $0.03 (3)
631 Court Administration $16,719 $16,719 $0.06 (3)
631 Court Administration $7,010 $7,010 $0.03 (3)
631 Court Administration $422,699 $422,699 $1.52 (3)
634 Clerk of Court $37,427 $37,427 $0.13 (3)
634 Clerk of Court $11,193 $11,193 $0.04 (3)
654 Clerk of Court $311 ,094 $311,094 $1.12 (3)
654 Clerk of Court $27,545 $27,545 $0.10 (3)
854 Clerk of Court-CapItal $8,238 $8,238 $0.03 (3)
674 Clerk of Court $130,434 $130,434 $0.47 (3)
874 Clerk of Court $11,353 $11,353 $0.04 (3)
674 Clerk of Court $1,839 $1,839 $0,01 (3)
694 Clerk of Court $285,587 $285,567 $1.03 (3)
694 Clerk of Court $22,051 $22,051 $0.06 (3)
694 Clerk of Court-Capital $2,677 $2,677 $0.01 (3)
713 Information Systems $1,304,710 $1,304,710 $4.70 (3)
719 Other Operating Court Costs $95,934 $95,934 $0.35 (3)
721 Court Administration $9,199 $9,199 $0.03 (3)
721 Court Administration $1,626 $1,628 $0.01 (3)
722 Stat. Attorney $136,500 $136,590 $0,50 (3)
723 Public Defender $125,375 $125,375 $0.45 (3)
724 Clerk of Court $893,167 $893,167 $2.50 (3)
724 Clerk ot Court $54,361 $54,361 $0.20 (3)
724 Clerk of Court $13,169 $13,169 $0,05 (3)
741 Court AdminIstration $9,198 $9,198 $0.03 (3)
741 Court Administration $1,626 $1,626 $0.01 (3)
744 Clerk of Court $540,677 $540,677 $1.95 (3)
744 Clerk of Court $54,083 $54,083 $0.19 (3)
744 Clerk ot Court $17,183 $17,163 $0.06 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $795,831 $795,831 $2.87 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $45,879 $45,679 $0.17 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $9,961 $9,961 $0.04 (3)
100048 Total $193,907,105 $91,368,590 $33,306,885 $316,604,560 $1,120.16 (1)
Balancing Expenditure (automatic calculation if needed) $4,452,342 $384,738 $0 $4,837,080 $17.01 (1)
Total Net of Capital Expenditures $189,454,763 $85,413,777 $33,308,86'
(1) Divisor includes FTE Population + FTE Employment + FTE Tourists
(2) Divisor includes FTE Population
(3) Divisor includes FTE Population + FTE Employment
11-9
CX>
CJ
,...
,...
I
,...
o
:; ;::; G) G) :c
UlO<OOO
ct. ~ =t; ~
e ii' (f) (1 _
g'~~'~::
Qt!!.=i~[
G>~~';--
o ::J CD "'0
<:Ciij';~
CD ~ () 0 ..,
3~C(Dg
~og:-2.
" 00
- 0 c:
- '" '"
" 01>, ll>
~-:o
ll>
~
o
o
o
g
-
"0
o
o
g
;::; 0
~ ~O" ,
!!l.
.,.:<
" "
~ 0
o "
it"
m a
o'
~ :0-
- ~
::: -
-0 '0
00
00
gg
,
,
00
3131
(') (')
ll> ll>
'" Ul
, ,
(f) 0
;:;: :::::I.
0;;;
~ :s-
""
" ll>
ll> ~
~ -
-" -
080
gag
ggg
;0 ;0
~ ~
c: c:
OJ iil
" "
lit lit
z Cl
ll> 0
<0' 3
::l" 3
g c:
3- ,",
o ~
~:o
:0 ~
~ ~
o
o
g
;0;0;::;>
<tl CD c:: ()
~ ~ ~ 5j
I I 3 Z
~ c
iiJ,
"
.(0
~ :c
o 0
ll> 3
" ll>
~.
~
i I
Eft -Eo<l {:R iR
Eft "'" ~ N.Eft ...... EA N (J'l Eft {:R Eft
(Jl P' In ~o i~~ _m ~co ..Ilor. 0 r co co .JIo
"0 Ul ()'l 0 '0 ..... 0 ~..... ).. .0 ... w....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~!~
I
'"
w
o
o
Cl;::;(f)
g i~'
g. ;' ti"
3 3 ;:]
~: ~ 2.
~;!;'"
-. cg.
~ 0
'" ll>
::l" "
" '"
m ~
....~~~
0) ...... ...... U'l
O..llor......<o
<0010N
t3~~~~~t';~~~~t3!!~
000 000 0 0 0 NON ~ .....
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Jl (J'l (Jl (Jl 0
Eft {:R Eft ill
EA......~,l::t.Eft......
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
,
'"
N
~~
~(ft-ER
- ~ ~
-< - -
o i::n i::n
000
i
....,
<;;1
'"
'"
....,'"
~I~
.
""'Eft{:R~
.....~~o
~ow~
{:R~""'~
:j ~ ~ ~
i
I
~ ~~~
o-:.s.o-oo>
~ ~ ~ ~ 8
Eft Eft Eft ""'.fA
tl'ltl'ltl'ltlltl'l
..... .....1..... ..... .....
i
~ ~t3~!!
~~-o~~~....:..t3~~rJ~
o 0 ...... 0 - ...... ...... <0 ...... ..., _ _ _
..... 0 ,I::t. (J'l ...... W m ...... (J'l ~ (J'l (Jl (J'l
~~~~
~ww w-....J-.....
~ tl'l tl'l J; J;
g 8 g ~ is
I
,
I
i
~~iR ""'''''
'0.0...... {:R........ ~
~fS~6::j::j::j
oOCowCoCoCo
OOCXICOCDCDCO
"'.... '"
ex> ex> ex>
N N N
-< -< -<
~
~'".....J
N -<
-< ex>
~~~~~
~~-~-~~
00000
~~~~~
-(0 -<.0 Co <0 <.0
U'l01.....-...jc.n
o 000 0
il
I::!!
iil
~
i
I
Iii
i
i
II
[
I
II
- Cl ....
3 It ..
~;:lf
~ ~ -
."Cl-
Ii g N
...
?1 "
li"~
Ul
.,
,
Q)
C'J
Table 11.2.7
Collier County
Impact Fee Revenue
= = = = = lID = = 2W. nil nil
Roads ImDact Fee Revenue
Single Family $3,167,520 $4,025,390 $5,015,240 $5,015,240 $5,015,240 $4,025,390 $4,025,390 $4,025,390 $4,025,390 $4,025,390 $3,009,144
Multjlamily $975,800 $1,150,050 $975,800 $975,800 $2,021,300 $975,800 $1,672,800 $975,800 $2,021,300 $975,800 $1,651,890
ACLF/Nu~ing Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $274,050 $0 $0
Retail $350,768 $489,481 $516,586 $481,509 $530,138 $564,418 $595,508 $462,376 $618,627 $480,712 $410,558
Offices $289,030 $393,554 $435,363 $439,908 $597,147 $495,351 $488,079 $675,313 $489,897 $304,482 $345,382
InstitLJt:ional $4,872,400 $534,858 $788,358 $788,358 $840,358 $872,858 $880,658 $983,358 $1,043,158 $1,086,924 $1,164,114
Hotel/Motel $445,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $567,000 $0 $0 $607,500 $0
Go~Course $0 $0 $360,560 $360,560 $0 $180,280 $0 $0 $360,060 $0 $0
GolflSwlmlTennls Clubhouse EU(Q .ill ~ .ill ~ .ill .ill .ill .ill .ill .ill
Tot~1 Ro~d~ Impatt Fee~ $10,166,188 $6,093,332 $8,254,831 $8,061,374 $9,134,523 $7,114,096 $8,229,435 $7,122,236 $8,832,982 $7,480,807 $6,581,088
= = = Wi = lID = = 2W. nil nil
f:lre Imnllct 1=.. R.v.nu.
Single Family $211,200 $268,400 $334,400 $334,400 $334,400 $268,400 $268,400 $268,400 $268,400 $268.400 $200,640
Multjfamlly $123,200 $145,:200 $123,200 $123,200 $255,200 $123,200 $211,200 $123.200 $255,200 $123,200 $208,560
ACLFfNu~ing Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
Retail-Community $15,400 $21,490 $22,680 $21,140 $23,275 $24,780 $26,145 $20,300 $27,160 $21,105 $18,025
Offices $11,130 $15,155 $16,765 $16,940 $22,995 $19,075 $18,795 $26,005 $18,865 $11,n!:i $13,300
Institutional $655,900 $72,000 $106,125 $106,125 $113,125 $117,500 $118,550 $132,375 $140,425 $146,317 $156,708
Hotel I Motel $38,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $52,500 $0
GolfCou~eAcres
Goll/SWimlTennls Clubhouse ~ .ill aLIlI. III ~ .ill .ill .ill .ill .ill .ill
Total Fire Impact Fees $1,058,830 $522,245 $611,920 $601,805 $755,995 $552,9613 $692,090 $570,280 $755,050 $623,247 $597,233
Wi = = Wi = lID = = 2W. nil l2JJ.
EMS Imeact Fee Rev.nu.
Single FamHy $62,400 $79,300 $96,800 $96,600 $96,800 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $59,280
Multfamily $2Q,120 $34,320 $29,120 $29,120 $57,020 $29,120 $47,720 $2'1,120 $57,020 $29,120 $47,OQ6
ACLF/Nursing Hom, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,850 $0 $0
Retail_Community $9,372 $13,078 $13,802 $12,665 $14.165 $1:";,060 $15,911 $12,304 516,52Q $12,844 510,970
Office $2,639 $3,594 $3,976 $4.017 $5,768 $4,524 $4.457 $6,587 $4,474 $2.781 $3,154
Institutional $63,716 $6,994 $10,309 $10,309 $10,969 $11,414 $11,516 $12,859 $13,641 $14,214 $15,223
Hotel I Motel $4,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,320 $0 $0 $5,700 $0
GolfCou~ $0 $0 $8,120 $6,120 $0 $4,060 $0 $0 $8,120 $0 $0
Golf/SwlmfTennls Clubhouse $2,100 $0 $5,2150 $0 $4,:200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Movie Theater m m .ill .ill .ill .ill iWi .ill m .ill .ill
Total EMS Impact Fees $173,527 $137,286 $169,377 $163,232 $190,942 $143,498 $167,188 $140,2:20 $213,134 $143,958 $135,7:23
= = = Wi = lID = = 2W. nil l2JJ.
Park!llmDactf'ee Revenue
Single Family $384,480 $488,610 $608,760 5608,760 5608,760 $488,810 $488,610 $488,510 $488,610 $488,810 $385,256
Muitll;lmily $153,160 $188,560 $1153,160 $153,160 $317,260 $153,160 $262,560 $153,180 $317,260 $153,160 $269,278
ACLf'/Nur1ling Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,400 $0 $0
Hotel/Motel w.m .ill .ill .ill m m WoW .ill m - .ill
Total Parks Impact Fee. $580,760 $677,170 $761,920 $761,920 $926,020 5641,770 $806,050 $641,770 5Q82,270 $700,570 $624,534
= = = = = lID = = 2W. l2JJ. l2JJ.
LlbrarvlmDar;:t Fee Revenue
Single Famlty $143,520 5182,390 $227,240 $227,240 $227,240 $182,390 $182,390 $182,390 $182,390 $182,390 $136,344
Multfamlly $66,640 $78,540 $66,640 $66,640 $130,840 $66,640 $109,440 $66,840 $130,840 $66,640 $108,012
AC'::1 F/NurllinaHome .ill .ill .ill .ill m m .ill .ill m .ill .ill
Total Libfary Impacl Fees $210,160 $260,930 $293,880 $293,880 $358,080 $249,030 $291,830 $249,030 $313,230 $249,030 $244,356
= = = Wi = lID = = 2W. nil l2JJ.
Public BUllcllnaB Jmeal::t File Revenue
Single Family $103,421 $131,431 $163,750 $163,750 $163,750 $131,431 $131,431 $131,431 $131,431 $131,431 $98,250
Multifamily $80,329 $71,102 $150,329 $80,329 $124,967 $60,329 $103,421 5eD,329 $124,987 $150,329 $102,128
ACL.F/Nursln9 Homo $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Retail-Community $55,994 $78,138 $82,464 $76,865 $84,628 $90,100 $96,063 $73,811 $98,754 $76,738 $65,539
Offic, $25,644 $34,917 $38,627 $39,030 $52,980 $43,949 $43,304 $59,916 $43,465 $27,014 $30,643
Insttlutional $562,200 $61,714 $90,964 $90,~4 $96,964 $100.114 5101,614 $113,464 $120,364 $125,414 $134,321
HOMI/MoMI w.i$ .ill .ill :ill :ill m m.w :ill :ill = .ill
Total Buildings Impact Fees $829,533 $377,302 $436,134 $430,938 $523,289 $426,1523 $502,763 $438,950 $518,980 $450,851 $430,881
= = = Wi = lID = = 2W. l2JJ. l2JJ.
Jail Facilities Imoact Fee Rllvenue
Single Falllily $56,630 $71,968 $89,665 $89,665 $89,665 $71,968 $71,968 $71,968 $71,968 571,968 $53,799
MUlmamily $33,034 $38,933 $33,034 $33,034 $68,428 $33,034 $156,630 $33,034 $68,428 $33,034 $55,923
ACLF/Nursing Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1S $0 $0
Retail-Community $48,048 $67,049 $70,762 $65,907 $72,618 $77,314 $81,572 $63,335 $84,139 $65,848 $56,238
Office $42,167 $57,416 $53,515 $64,178 $87,118 $72,267 $71,206 $98,522 $71,471 $44,421 "0,388
im~titutional $219,258 $24,069 $30,476 $35,476 $37,816 $39,279 $39,830 $44,251 $46,942 $48,912 $52,385
Hotel/Motel $25,740 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,760 $0 $0 $35,100 $0
GOIUSwlmlTennls Clubhouse 12.W. iQ 1!l.2iQ iQ ll!.W. m iQ m m .ill .ill
Total Jail Facilltloa Impact Felli $430,494 $269,434 $306,492 $288,310 $366,8n $293,861 $353,766 $311,111 $343,566 $299,282 $268,733
= = = Wi = lID = = 2W. nil l2JJ.
SOhQollmeact File Revenue
Single Family $853,440 $1,084,580 $1,351,280 $1,351,280 $1,351,280 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $810,768
Multifamily $231,560 $272,910 $231,560 $231,560 $479,660 $231,560 $396,960 $231,560 $479,660 $231,560 $391,998
ACI F/Nu~lnq Home .ill .ill ~ ill ~ .ill ~ ~ ~ ~ .ill
Total School Impact Fee~ $1,065,000 $1,357,490 $1,582,840 $1,582,840 $1,830,940 $1,316,140 $1,481,540 $1,316,140 $1,936,390 $1,316,140 $1,202,766
11-11
co
C"':)
~
· 8e
PART III. Environmental Resources Impacts
QUESTION 12 - VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
A. Identify the dominant species and other unusual or unique features of the plant
communities on Map F. Identify and describe the amount of all plant communities
that will be preserved in a natural state following development as shown on Map H.
Existing Vegetation Associations
The habitat and vegetation survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover
and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation
communities, landforms, and land uses present on the project site. Land use /Iand
cover associations within the project area were delineated at a 1 "=400' scale on true-
color aerial photography taken in April 2003. Mapping was performed by certified
ecologists and/or qualified field biologists, utilizing the FLUCCS Levell" or Level IV
classifications (FOOT, 1999). Vegetative and land use mapping was conducted
primarily during the latter half of 2003. The locations of the various FLUCCS types are
displayed on Map F-1 of this ADA
A significant factor in mapping vegetative associations and land uses on the Town of
Ave Maria site is the historic disturbance within nearly all vegetated areas not currently
under cultivation within the Town boundary. Many of these areas were once cleared of
native vegetation and utilized for row crops, pasture, equipment or supply storage, or all
of the above over time. Remnant furrows, ditches, berms, and other signs of disturbance
are present within these vegetated areas. In most cases, the history of disturbance has
demonstrably altered the natural hydrology of these areas, and produced vegetation
communities dominated by pioneer plant species and invasive exotic plants.
Invasive exotic plant species such as Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), torpedo
grass (Panicum repens), Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), cogon grass
(Imperata cylindrica) and Caesar-weed (Urena /obata) are commonly encountered in
varying densities within the project site. Four levels of exotic density were mapped by
Wilson Miller using photo interpretation and field observations. Code modifiers are
appended to the FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic species in
the canopy or understory, as follows:
E1 = Exotics 10-24%
E2 = Exotics 25-49%
E3 = Exotics 50-75%
E4 = Exotics 75-84%
Areas were mapped by WilsonMiller as Brazilian pepper (FLUCCS 422 or 619,
depending upon wetland status) when Brazilian pepper constituted more than 75% of
the canopy and subcanopy strata, and native vegetation in these strata provided less
than 15% cover. Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) does occur sporadically on site,
but not in densities high enough to be reflected in the FLUCCS mapping.
Nuisance plant species, as defined by SFWMD and other agencies, are non-native
species which tend to out-compete native species and become quickly established,
712312004- 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,,~
03786-013-00G-PDRl-28423
12-1
Be
"'..
!"
especially in areas of disturbance or where the normal hydroperiod has been altered.
The most common nuisance plant species found on site was common primrose willow
(Ludwigia peruviana), which dominated the wetland vegetation communities in several
areas.
Map F-1 depicts the present land use and land cover on the 4995:t-acre Town of Ave
Maria site. The native plant communities shown on Map F-1 are not unusual or unique.
Large acreages of vegetation associations with similar characteristics are common in the
region.
Table 12.A-1Iists each of the vegetation associations (FLUCCS categories) depicted on
the enclosed Map F-1, along with the cumulative acreage of each association and the
percentage of the total property acreage accounted for by each association. The intensive
mapping identifies distinct FLUCCS categories to allow detailed project planning and
evaluation of impacts.
The following paragraphs provide a general description of the vegetative associations of
the FLUCCS categories provided on Map F-1.
Improved Pastures (FLUCCS Code 211)
These areas, located in the northeastern and north-central portions of the site are
utilized as cattle pasture and undergo intensive maintenance such as brush clearing,
mowing, burning, re-seeding with pasture grasses, fertilization, and maintenance of
water ponds. The improved pastures contain no canopy species, with only widely
scattered Brazilian pepper and cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) in the sub-canopy.
Groundcover pasture grasses are dominated by Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), with
lesser amounts of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus),
and torpedo grass. Ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiifolia), dog fennel (Eupatorium
cappilifolium), Caesar-weed, broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), and other common
species also occur in the groundcover.
Unimproved Pastures, 10-25% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 212E1)
These areas are utilized as cattle pasture and undergo limited maintenance such as
brush-hogging to remove overgrown shrubs and grasses. A small area of unimproved
pasture occurs in the south central portion of the site, a remnant of a much larger
pasture area that has now become infested with Brazilian pepper.
Row Crops (FLUCCS Code 214)
These areas are generally comprised of tomato fields, with smaller acreages of row crops
such as peppers, eggplants, etc. These row crop areas include associated agricultural
infrastructure (e.g., field ditches, internal roads, etc.). Row crops comprise over two-thirds
of the total Town acreage (3357 out of 4995 acres), and are located throughout the site.
Sod Farms (FLUCCS Code 242)
Sod farms are planted with Sl. Augustine grass, which is harvested and sold as sod to
residential and commercial customers. The sod farms occur on the eastern portions of the
site,
Other Open Lands - Rural (FLUCCS Code 260)
7/2312004- 135526 Vel: 011_ MPERRY
~
03786-013-000.PDRI-28423
12-2
8e
These areas contain facilities that support agricultural operations, such as office trailers,
garages, machine shops, fannworker lunch areas, etc.
Fallow Crop Land (FLUCCS #261)
Fallow crop land consists of fields that have been recently cropped, but are not currently in
production due to agricu~uralleasing, crop rotations, reduced planting area, etc.
Table 12.A-1: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Use Descriptions
FLUccS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
211 Improved Pastures 583.1 11.7
212E1 Unimproved Pastures, 10-24% exotic cover 5.2 0.1
214 Row Crops 3356.8 67.2
242 Sod Farms 327.4 6.6
260 Other Open Lands - Rural 28.4 0.6
261 Fallow Crop Land 133.0 2.7
310D Herbaceous (Dry Prairie), disturbed 5.3 0.1
321 Palmetto Prairies 42.8 0,9
329 Other Shrubs and Brush 18.7 0.4
330 Mixed Rangeland 39.5 0.8
411 Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory 15.2 0.3
Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory, 50-75% 0.5 0.0
411E3 exotic cover
Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory, >75% 0.6 0.0
411E4 exotic cover
416D Pine Flatwoods, graminoid underst()ry, disturbed 9.0 0.2
Pine Flatwoods, graminoid understory, 50-75% 35.1 0.7
416E3 exotic cover
422 Brazilian Pepper (upland) 36.7 0.7
434 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed 4.0 0.1
434E3 2.2 0.0
512 Agricultural canals 25.4 0.5
617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 1.3 0.0
618 Willow 16.2 0.3
618E2 Willow, 25-49% exotic cover 1.1 0.0
618E3 Willow, 50-75% exotic cover 8.0 0.2
619 Brazilian Pepper (wetland) 91.2 1.8
621 Cypress 8.0 0.2
621E2 ~ress, 25-49% exotic cover 0.2 0.0
621E3 Cypress, 50-75% exotic cover 8.0 0.2
624E1 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm, 10-25% exotic cover 1.4 0.0
625 Ijydric Pine Flatwoods 6.8 0.1
625E3 Hydric Pine Flatwoods, 50-75% exotic cover 1.8 0.0
625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods, >75% exotic cover 1,7 0.0
630E4 Wetland Forested Mixed, >75% exotic cover 9.9 0.2
631 Wetland Shrubs and Brush 12.5 0.3
6310 Wetland Shrubs and Brush, disturbed 22.0 0.4
641 Freshwater Marsh 27.9 0.6
7/231200<I- nS526 Verc 011- MPERRY
~~
03186-013--000.-PDRI_28423
12-3
Be
FLUccS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
6419 Freshwater Marsh, Primrose Willow Predominant 1.8 0.0
6410 Freshwater Marsh, disturbed 1,5 0.0
641E2 Freshwater Marsh, 25-49% exotic cover 1.1 0.0
641E3 Freshwater Marsh, 50-75% exotic cover 0.5 0,0
641E4 Freshwater Marsh, >75% exotic cover 3.1 0.1
643 Wet Prairie 30.2 0.6
643D Wet Prairie, disturbed 35.8 0.7
740 Disturbed Lands I Barren 0.7 0.0
8145 Roads and Highways, Graded and Drained 33.5 0.7
Total 4995.0 100.0
Herbaceous - Dry Prairie, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 310 D)
One small area (5.3 acres) of this upland vegetation community was mapped on the
western portion of the site. It is not a native dry prairie, but a cleared former pasture that
has regenerated to a wide variety of species. Major plant species include gallberry (Ilex
glabra), bushy bluestem (Andropogon glomeratus), rusty Iyonia (Lyonia ferruginea),
wiregrass (Aristida spicata), Caesar weed (Urena lobata), and saw palmetto, with
scattered highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Vines include muscadine grape
(Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia).
Palmetto Prairies (FLUCCS Code 321)
These open areas occur mainly as isolated communities within and bordering the large
pasture areas on the northeast portion of the site. They lack a significant tree canopy and
are dominated by saw palmetto. Various upland grasses and forbs (e.g., smutgrass) are
found in the open spaces between clumps of saw palmetto.
Other Shrubs and Brush (FLUCCS Code 329)
One area of this upland shrub community occurs at the northeast corner of the site. The
area shows signs of historic clearing, and has some degree of Brazilian pepper infestation.
Common shrub species within this area include wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), saltbush
(Baccharis halimifolia), saw palmetto, and rusty Iyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). Groundcover
species include bahiagrass, smutgrass, ragweed, torpedo grass, flat sedge (Cyperus spp.),
Caesar-weed, love vine, and Muscadine grape vine.
Mixed Ranoeland (FLUCCS Code 330)
This upland community occurs in the southern portion of the site, and consists of grassland
and shrubland in approximately equal proportions. Shrubs include wax myrtle, saltbush,
and Brazilian pepper. Groundcover consists of a wide variety of grasses and ruderal
species, including bahiagrass, Caesar-weed, dog fennel, torpedo grass, goldenrod
(Euthamia minot'), broomsedge, bushy bluestem, ragweed, Asiatic coinwort (Centella
asiatica), and Muscadine grapevine. 'Volunteer" (unplanted) sugar cane (Saccharum
officinarum) plants occur in some portions ofthis community.
Pine Flatwoods. Saw Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS Code 411)
These pine f1atwoods, found mainly in isolated patches within the western portion of the
site, consist of a slash pine (Pinus elliottiJ) canopy with an understory of saw palmetto.
Scattered gallberry, rusty Iyonia, myrsine (Rapanea punctata) and wax myrtle are present
712312004-135526 Ver: 011. MPERRY
c_,
03786.-013-00o-PDRl-2B423
12-4
Be
in the sub-canopy. The groundcover stratum is dominated by saw palmetto. Associated
species consist of wiregrass (Aristida spp.), Caesar-weed, bracken fern (pteridium
aquilinum), and pennyroyal (Satureja rigida). Vines include lovevine, Virginia creeper,
muscadine grape, catbrier (Smilax bona-nox) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
Pine Flatwoods. Saw Palmetto Understory. exotic cover 50-75% (FLUCCS Code 411 E3)
This small patch of pine flatwoods occurs at the southern end of the entrance road. The
native cover is comprised of slash pine canopy and saw palmetto understory, with 50-75
percent areal coverage by Brazilian pepper in the sub-canopy.
Pine Flatwoods. Saw Palmetto Understory, exotic cover> 75% (FLUCCS Code 411 E4)
This small patch of pine flatwoods also occurs at the southern end of the entrance road.
The native cover is comprised of slash pine canopy and saw palmetto understory, with
more than 75 percent areal coverage by dense Brazilian pepper in the sub-canopy.
Pine Flatwoods, Graminoid Understory, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 416D)
This upland community occurs on the eastern portion of the site, and experienced prior
clearing of understory species on one or more occasions. The sparse canopy consists of
slash pines, with few sub-canopy plants such as wax myrtle and saltbush. The groundcover
is strongly dominated by Caesar-weed and ragweed, with small amounts of broomsedge,
dog fennel, etc.
Pine Flatwoods, Graminoid Understory. exotic cover 50-75% (FLUCCS Code 416E3)
Approximately 35 acres of this upland community occur near the center of the site. The
area had been historically cleared for pasture and row crops, but has become overgrown
over the last two decades. The slash pine canopy includes scattered cabbage palm. The
sub-canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper, but also includes wax myrtle, slash pine,
saltbush, and gallberry. The groundcover consists of bahiagrass, smutgrass, scattered saw
palmetto, Asiatic coinwort, flat sedge, cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), dog fennel,
Muscadine grape vine, and poison ivy.
Brazilian Pepper (FLUCCS Code 422)
These communities generally occur on disturbed upland areas (e.g., old spoil piles or
berms) where Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominates the canopy, sub-
canopy and groundcover and exceeds 75% of the total plant cover. Native species
comprise less than 15% of the canopy and sub-canopy strata. Associated plant species
(when present) include ragweed, Caesar-weed, dog fennel, muscadine grape (Vitis
rotundifolia), sandspur (Cenchrus longspinus), Spanish needles (Bidens alta),and other
ruderal species (plants adapted to disturbed areas).
Hardwood - Conifer Mixed (FLUCCS Code 434)
Two areas were mapped to this community type, one along the northern site boundary, and
one remnant community within the improved pasture. The canopy consist of slash pine,
cabbage palm, and laurel oak, with a sub-canopy of myrsine, wax myrtle, and Brazilian
pepper. The groundcover includes saw palmetto, cabbage palm, muscadine grape vine,
swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), and cabbage palm seedlings.
Hardwood - Conifer Mixed. 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 434E3)
This small area, near the northern site boundary, is very similar to the FLUCCS 434
community described above, but contains Brazilian pepper that comprises 50-75 percent of
the vegetation cover.
712312004_ 135526 Ve~ 01!- MPERRY
CMe
03786-013-000-PORI_28423
12-5
Be
Aoricultural Canals (FLUCCS Code 512)
The FLUCCS system (FDOT, 1999) does not have a separate code for large agricultural
canals, but Wilson Miller assigned a FLUCCS code 512 to these features. These large
canals convey agricultural stormwater from fields and deliver water into the permitted water
retention areas that occur just outside the westem boundary of the site.
Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCCS Code 617)
One small isolated patch of this forest type exists near the center of the site, west of the
entrance road. The canopy species include cypress (Taxodium distichum), red maple
(Acerrubrum), cabbage palm, and scattered sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana). Sub-
canopy species include wax myrtle, myrsine, cabbage palm, and dahoon holly (/lex
cassine). Patches of swamp fern and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense) occur as the
predominant groundcover. Old world climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), an exotic
invasive species, is well-established in the western half of the forest patch.
Willow (FLUCCS Code 618)
Mapped areas of willow occur east of the existing farm haul road. These areas are all
ditched and bermed systems, typically with a dense ring of Brazilian pepper around the
periphery. Willow (Salix carotiniana) dominates the sub-canopy, with a handful of other
species (e.g., dahoon holly) occurring in shallower water along the edges. Groundcover
species include primrose willow, arrow head (Saggitaria lancifotia), pickerel weed
(Pontedaria cordata), maiden cane (Panicum hemitomon), swamp fern, and balsam apple
(Momordica charantia). Aquatic species typically consist of duckweed (Lemna minorj and
water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). White vine (Sarcestemma clausum) commonly occurs to
such an extent that it hinders walking through the willow areas.
Willow. 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 618E3)
These areas are similar in character to the willow communities described above, but
Brazilian pepper occurs throughout much of the wetland, comprising 50-75 percent cover.
The number of native plant species observed in this exotic-infested community is lower
than in uninfested areas.
Willow, >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 618E4)
Brazilian pepper dominates the sub-canopy in these areas, but willow comprises more than
15 percent of the cover. As with the prior category, plant species diversity is limited.
Exotic Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCCS Code 619)
These communities generally occur within historically disturbed wetland areas, often at the
interface of agricultural and non-cultivated areas (e.g., isolated cypress domes, former wet
pastures, etc,) Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominates the canopy, sub-
canopy and groundcover and exceeds 75% of the total plant cover, with less than 15% of
the cover consisting of native species. In some of the older Brazilian pepper stands, the
DBH (diameter at breast height) for the trees is 12 inches or more.
Cypress (FLUCCS Code 621)
This community is composed primarily of bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), with or
without minor amounts of red maple, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and red bay (Persea
borbonia). Dahoon holly, cabbage palm, and wax myrtle typically occur in the subcanopy.
Ground cover species may include swamp fern, Royal fern (Osmunda regalis),
pickerelweed, arrowhead, buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), saw-grass, and catbrier
7/2312004- 135526 Ver 011_ MPERRY
,-
03186.013-QOO.-PDRJ.26423
12-6
8e
(Smilax auriculata). Scattered epiphytes such as wild pines (e.g., Tillandsia f1exuosa, T.
fasiculata), golden polypody (Phlebodium aureum), etc. may be found on the cypress in
most locations.
Cvpress. 25-49% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 621 E2)
This small area (0.2 acre) occurs within an isolated wetland on the northern portion of the
site. Brazilian pepper comprises approximately one-third to one-half of the plant cover.
Cvpress, 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 621E3)
These communities can be found in a few isolated wetlands within row-crop fields. Brazilian
pepper comprises between one-half and three-quarters of the plant cover.
Cvpress-Pine-Cabbaoe Palm, 10-24% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 624E1)
This community includes cypress, pine and cabbage palm in the canopy stratum, in
combinations where no species achieves dominance. Sub-canopy species include wax
myrtle, saltbush, cabbage palm, slash pine, and scattered cypress. Groundcover consists
of bahiagrass, torpedo grass, Asiatic coinwort, and scattered swamp fern. Brazilian pepper
comprises approximately 20% of the plant cover.
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods (FLUCCS Code 625)
Small areas of this community are scattered across the site. The canopy is dominated by a
slash pine. The sub-canopy may include slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, myrsine wax
myrtle, saltbush, dahoon holly, and scattered saw palmetto. Groundcover species include
wiregrass, swamp fern, Caesar-weed, marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellate), flat
sedge (Cyperus Iigularis), and bushy bluestem.
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 625E3)
These areas generally occur within isolated wetlands, adjacent to Brazilian pepper
rnonocultures (FLUCCS 619). The community is similar to the f1atwood vegetation
described above, but with less species diversity and more than 50 percent cover by
Brazilian pepper.
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods. >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 625E4)
These small areas are similar to the previous category, but Brazilian pepper cover exceeds
75 percent. Slash pine comprises at least 15 percent of the canopy.
Wetland Forested Mixed. >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 630E4)
This category includes mixed wetland forest communities in which neither hardwoods nor
conifers achieve a 66 percent dominance of the crown canopy composition. A small area
of this type, near the center of the site, contains a canopy of slash pine, cypress, red maple,
and laurel oak. The sub-canopy includes Brazilian pepper, with minor amounts of cypress,
cabbage palm, myrsine, and wax myrtle. Ground cover is sparse, but contains patches of
swamp fern and sawgrass.
Wetland Shrub (FLUCCS Code 631)
This area, in an isolated wetland east of the existing farm haul road, consists of mix of
shrub species that includes Brazilian pepper, wax myrtle, and saltbush. The groundcover
species include Bahia grass, Asiatic coinwort (Centella asiatica), dog fennel, scattered
smutgrass, Caesar-weed, ragweed, and other ruderal species.
7/23/2004--135526 VII" 011- MPERRY
~
03786-013-00Q.-PDRI-2S..23
12-7
Wetland Shrub, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 6310)
A 22-acre area of this community occurs on the west-central portion of the site. The area
was formerly under row crop production, and remnant furrows, raised beds, and field
ditches are plainly observed. The vegetation community is a broad mixture of shrub and
groundcover species, Scattered canopy trees account for less than 10 percent of the area,
and include slash pine, red maple, cabbage palm, and laurel oak. The sub-canopy contains
Brazilian pepper, wax myrtle, saltbush, cabbage palm, red maple, slash pine, and gallberry,
among other things. Groundcover includes bahiagrass, Caesar-weed, bushy bluestem,
marsh pennywort, Asiatic coinwort, chalky bluestem, dog fennel, and primrose willow.
Vines include muscadine grape vine, love vine, cat brier, and Old World climbing fern.
"'se
Freshwater Marsh (FLUCCS Code 641)
These communities occur as isolated wetlands throughout the site, ranging in size from
one acre to 11 acres. Most of these communities contain smartweed (Polygonum spp.),
maidencane, pickerelweed, camphor weed (Pluchea spp.), marsh pennywort, and
Asiatic coinwort. Larger marshes may also include arrow head, St. John's wort
(Hypericum spp.), rush fuirena (Fuirena scirpoidea), and climbing hempweed (Mikania
scandens), and may be heavily invaded by common primrose willow.
Freshwater Marsh. Primrose Willow Predominant (FLUCCS Code 6419)
These areas occur on the eastern portion of the site, and are associated with willow.
Primrose willow comprises more than 50 percent of the groundcover, and may exceed
90 percent coverage.
Freshwater Marsh. disturbed (FLUCCS Code 6410)
This small (1.5 acre) area occurs within a mixed rangeland (FLUCCS 330) community,
and was created as the result of a shallow borrow pit. The vegetation consist primarily of
torpedo grass, an exotic invasive species.
Freshwater Marsh. 25-49% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 641 E2)
A one-acre area of this community occurs within an isolated cypress dome on the south
of the property. The marsh vegetation includes maidencane, pickerel weed, alligator flag
(Thalia geniculata), with primrose willow, Brazilian pepper comprises approximately one-
third of the plant cover.
Freshwater Marsh. 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 641E3)
This community is located within the same general area, and possesses similar
vegetation as the 641 E2 community described above, but with Brazilian pepper cover
exceeding 50 percent.
Wet Prairie (FLUCCS Code 643)
This classification is composed of dominantly grassy vegetation within current or former
pasture areas. The predominant groundcover consists of torpedo grass, frog fruit (Phyla
nodif/ora), bahiagrass, smartweed, marsh pennywort, Asiatic coinwort, and other plants
transitional between upland herbaceous systems and freshwater marsh vegetation.
7123J200~- 135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~~
03786-013.000-PDR1.26423
12-8
Be
Wet Prairie. disturbed (FLUCCS Code 643D)
These areas occur mainly on the western portions of the site, where land was formerly
maintained (roller-chopped, mowed, etc.) for use as unimproved pasture. The hydrology of
much of this area was made artificially wet due to influxes of agricultural stormwater,
producing an odd assemblage of plant species. Gallberry, saltbush and wax myrtle occur
as scattered shrubs. Groundcover includes upland species such as saw palmetto,
highbush blueberry, and pawpaw (Asimina tri/oba). Other species include bushy bluestem,
flat sedge, Caesar-weed, Asiatic coinwort, swamp fern, and primrose willow.
Disturbed Land (FLUCCS Code 740)
This category is reserved for predominantly barren land that has resulted from
earthmoving activities such as canal maintenance, berm construction, etc. Scattered
ruderal species may be found within these small areas.
Roads and Hiqhwavs, Graded and Drained (FLUCCS Code 8145)
This category is reserved for the main farm haul road and its major tributaries.
Preserved Vegetation Associations
Agricultural land uses, invasive exotic monocultures, and infrastructure account for
approximately 92 percent of the total site acreage. The remaining eight percent constitutes
"native vegetation," which is generally scattered, isolated, and heavily impacted by past and
present agricultural activities. The low proportion of native vegetation and wetlands on-site
was a major determinant in site selection, and overall project impacts to native vegetation
were therefore limited primarily via avoidance.
Preservation and enhancement of 62 acres of native wetland vegetation are currently
incorporated into the master plan (see Wetland Preserve designations on Map H). These
areas are severely degraded by historic clear-cutting and pasture management, and now
exist as exotic monocultures (Brazilian pepper). A remnant cypress dome occurs in one
preserve, while small areas of hydric pine f1atwood and willow marsh occur in the other
preserve. As currently envisioned, these areas will be restored as freshwater marshes that
will be integrated into the surface water management lake system. These restored marshes
will provide high-quality habitat for wading birds and other wetland-dependent species, and
will enhance post-development water quality.
In addition to on-site preserves, wetland impact mitigation will be achieved largely or
entirely (per the ERP mitigation process) by enhancing portions of the large contiguous
native vegetation communities that occur outside of the western boundary of the Town.
These large systems, comprising the eastern border of the Camp Keais Strand, are
degraded due to invasive exotic species and pioneer plant species that exploit the "edge
effect" adjacent to agricultural fields, Enhancements to these large contiguous systems
produces a greater net environmental benefit than the preservation of small, widely
scattered, severely degraded native vegetation communities on-site that are currently
surrounded by agricultural fields and will eventually be surrounded by development in post-
construction. The prioritization, extent, and nature of wetland enhancements within these
larger offsite systems will be determined in consu~ation with SFWMD and FWC.
712312004- 135526 Ver 011. MPERRY
~~
03786-013-000-PDRI.28423
12-9
'-8C
As mentioned repeatedly throughout this document, this project is within the Collier
County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) overlay. In essence, project entitlement
occurs through the relinquishing of specified land uses on environmentally sensitive lands
within the RLSA, in exchange for directing compact forms of rural development onto lands
with low environmental value. Project impacts are therefore concentrated where they have
the least environmental impact, as is the case with the Town of Ave Maria. Environmentally
sensitive lands are protected as large contiguous blocks native vegetation andlor a
landscape matrix of native vegetation and agricultural land uses.
B. Discuss what survey methods were used to determine the absence or presence of
state or federally listed wildlife and plants. (Sampling methodology should be
agreed to by the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at
preapplication conference stage.) State actual sampling times and dates, and
discuss any factors that may have influenced the results of the sampling effort.
Show on Map G the location of all transects, trap grids, or other sampling stations
used to determine the on-site status of state or federally listed wildlife and plant
resources.
WilsonMiller conducted a comprehensive biological survey ofthe Town site, using field
methodologies that were consistent with those prescribed by the 1988 FGFWFC
publication Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.0 of the Application for
Development Approval (FGFWFC, 1988). The surveys also employed the "Standardized
State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects," a more recent
standardized survey methodology for southwest Florida (J. Beever III, Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission-FWC, 2002). Listed plant and wildlife species were
considered to be those species documented within the FWC publication Florida's
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Species of Special Concern: Official Lists
(FWC, 1997; 2004).
Prior to the listed species field investigations, color aerials and field-verified FLUCCS maps
were reviewed to identify the various vegetation communities present on-site. Based on
the vegetative habitat types identified, agency contacts, the FWS listed species information,
a literature search, FWC GIS database information, and Florida Natural Areas Inventory
(FNAI) GIS database information, a preliminary list of potential listed flora and fauna that
could be present on-site was determined. Refer to the attached species occurrence record
from FNAI, RCW, and FWS.
The field surveys consisted of pedestrian, vehicular, andlor all-terrain vehicle (A TV)
transects through the various habitats or vegetation associations. Refer to Map G for
transect locations. The choice of transect method was dictated by the land cover (e.g., row
crop, pasture, wetland forest, etc.) and the objective of a given survey (general survey
versus a species-specific survey). The surveys provided direct visual inspection of the vast
majority of the Town site, owing to the agricultural character of the property, the generally
wide field of vision, and the ease of traversing the JlIIiiltlilKy small extent of natural
vegetation on and adjacent to the site,
The surveys were conducted at various times on any given day. Surveys were conducted
such that observations included time periods ranging from one-half hour before sunrise to
one-half hour past sunset. Barring seasonal considerations, the survey dates allowed for
observations during likely times of probable occurrence for the majority of the listed wildlife
species which could occur on-site. During the survey, temperatures ranged from the mid
712312004-135526 Ver: 01!_ MPERRY
,-
11371lEl-Q13.000-PDRI_28423
12-10
8C
60s to the low 80s (degrees Fahrenheit) and conditions ranged from clear to overcast and
mostly calm winds. The weather conditions on survey days were therefore suitable for
wildlife observations.
The following provides a brief overview of how the methodologies employed during the
surveys deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended
in the referenced RlVC document.
'Wetland Survevs" - Methods used were consistent except that surveys addressed more
species than those listed in the 1988 RlVC publication.
"Upland Survevs" - Methods used were consistent except that in the majority of cases, the
density of transects occupied exceeded the RlVC recommended density.
"Small Mammal Samplina" - No small mammal trapping was performed. None of the
species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the
property due to inappropriate range and habitat.
"Heroetofaunal Survevs" - No herpetofaunal trapping was performed. Eastem indigo snake
is the only listed species that could be reasonably expected to occur on the property.
"Gopher Tortoise Burrow Survevs" - Despite intensive searches for gopher tortoise
burrows within appropriate habitats, none were observed.
Species-specific surveys were dictated by on s~e habitats, RlVC guidelines, and field
observations. Four species ultimately were the subject of specific surveys: burrowing owl
(Speotyto cunicularia), Florida sandhill crane (Grus Canadensis pratensis), Southeastem
American kestrel (Falco sparverius paulus), and Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus
plancus audubonii or Caracara cheriway).
Table 12.8-1 provides details on the dates, times, and personnel associated with the listed
species surveys. Approximately 562 person-hours were dedicated to the surveys.
Table 12.8-1
Listed Species Survey Details for the Town
BJ 2/412003 9:30 am - 4:30 7
TT 2/412003 9:30 am - 4:30 m 7
BJ 2/512003 10:00 am - 3:00 m 5
TT 2/5/2003 10:00 am - 3:00 m 5
BJ 2/11/2003 9:00 am - 5:00 m 8
TT 2/11/2003 9:00 am - 5;00 m 8
BJ 2/2412003 10:45 am - 5:10 m 6.5
TT 2/2412003 10:45am-5:10 m 6.5
BJ 3/512003 7:30 am - 6:30 m 11
TT 3/5/2003 7:30 am - 6:30 m 11
BJ 3/612003 8:00 am - 5:30 m 9.5
TT 3/6/2003 8:00 am - 5:30 m 9.5
7/2312004_ 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,~.
037l\&-(11:J.-ooo.PDR1-28423
12-11
.BC
BJ 317/2003 10:00 am-4:15pm 6.25
IT 3/7/2003 10:00am-4:15pm 6.25
BJ 3/19/2003 7:00 am-3:30 pm 8.5
IT 3/19/2003 7:00 am - 3:30 pm 8.5
JH 3/2012003 9:30 am - 3:30 pm 6
IT 3/2012003 9:30 am - 3:30 pm 6
IT 3/21/2003 12:00 pm - 3:30 pm 3.5
BJ 3/2612003 8:30 am - 4:00 pm 7.5
IT 3/2612003 8:30 am - 4:00 pm 7.5
BJ 3/27/2003 10:30 am - 3:40 pm 5.25
IT 3/27/2003 10:30 am-3:40pm 5.25
IT 3/28/2003 11:50 am-3:50 pm 4
BJ 4/1/2003 10:00 am - 3:30 pm 5.5
IT 4/1/2003 10:00 am - 3:30 pm 5.5
BJ 4/11/2003 11:30 am-4:00 pm 4.5
IT 4/11/2003 11:30 am-4:00 pm 4.5
BJ 4/2212003 11:00 am-4:00pm 5
IT 4/2212003 11:00am-4:00 pm 5
BJ 4/24/2003 9:30 am - 5:00 pm 7.5
IT 4/2412003 9:30 am - 5:00 pm 7.5
IT 5/6/2003 12:00 pm- 4:00 pm 4.0
IT 5/8/2003 10:00 am - 4:00 pm 6
BJ 5/13/2003 10:30 am-4:00pm 5.5
IT 5/13/2003 10:30 am-4:00 pm 5.5
BJ 5/16/2003 11:00 am-4:00 pm 5
IT 5/1612003 11:ooam-4:oo pm 5
IT 5/2012003 9:15am-4:00pm 6.75
IT 5/29/2003 10:00 am-4:oo pm 6
BJ 6/1612003 10:00 am - 4:00 pm 6
IT 6/16/2003 10:00 am-4:00 pm 6
BJ 6/25/2003 10:30 am - 3:00 pm 4.5
IT 6/2512003 10:30 am - 3:00 pm 4.5
BJ 6/27/2003 9:00 am-ll:30 pm 2.5
IT 6/27/2003 9:00 am-11:30 pm 2.5
BJ 7 fl/2003 9:15 am - 6:30 pm 9.25
BL 7fl/2003 9:15am-6:30pm 9.25
JS 7/7/2003 9:15am-6:30pm 9.25
IT 7/7/2003 9:15am-6:30pm 9.25
JS 8/7/2003 9:00 am-l:00 pm 4
IT 8/7/2003 9:00 am -1 :00 pm 4
BL 8/12/2003 4:00 pm - 7:30 pm 3.5
JS 8/12/2003 4:00 pm - 7:30 pm 3.5
JH 8/18/2003 2:45 pm - 7:30 pm 4.75
JS 8/1812003 2:45 pm - 7:30 pm 4.75
JH 8/19/2003 3:00 pm - 6:30 pm 3.5
7/2312004.135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~
03786-013-0QCl-PDRI-26423
12-12
Be
JS 8119/2003 3:00 m - 6:30 3.5
JS 812012003 7:00 am - 1 :30 m 6.5
IT 812012003 7:00 am - 1 :30 6.5
JH 8/2112003 5:30 am - 3:00 m 9.5
JS 812112003 5:30 am - 3:00 9.5
JH 812212003 5:30 am -1 :30 m 8
JS 812212003 5:30 am -1:30 m 8
BL 812512003 6:45 am -10:00 am 3.25
BL 812712003 7:00 am-12:oo m 5
JS 812912003 9:30 am - 12:30 m 3
JS 91412003 2:15 -5:15 m 3
BJ 1212212003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
BL 1212212003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
JH 1212212003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
JS 1212212003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
IT 1212212003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
BJ 1212312003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
BL 1212312003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
IT 1212312003 9:00 am - 3:30 6.5
IT 21312004 9:00 am - 3:30 6.5
BL 21412004 7:00am - 2:00 m 7
JS 21512004 9:30am-4:oo m 6.5
CS 211712004 9:30 am - 5:30 m 8.5
BL 211812004 8:00 am - 3:00 m 7
CS 211912004 9:30 am - 5:00 m 7.5
JS 311612004 9:00 am - 5:00 m 8
CS 311712004 8:30 am - 5:00 m 8.5
CS 3118/2004 8:30 am-5:00 m 8.5
JH 313112004 9:30am-4:45 m 7.25
JS 313112004 9:30 am - 4:45 m 7.25
JH 41112004 9:30 am - 4:15 m 6.75
JS 41112004 9:30am-4:15 6.75
Hours 562.0
Personnel key: TT(Tom Trettis); JS (Justin Styer); CS (Craig Schmittler); BL (Bruce Layman); JH (Jennifer Hecker);
BJ (Bruce Johnson)
c. List all state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources that were observed on the
site and show location on Map G. Given the plant communities on-site, list any
additional state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources expected to occur on
the site and show the location of suitable habitat on Map G. Additionally, address
any unique wildlife and plant resources, such as colonial bird nesting sites and
migrating bird concentration areas. For species that are either observed or expected
to utilize the site, discuss the known or expected location and population size on-
site, existence (and extent, if known) of adjacent, contiguous habitat off-site, and any
special habitat requirements of the species.
7/2312004.135526 Ver:011-MPERRY
~~
03786-013.000-PDRI.28423
12-13
Be
Listed plant species observed on site are summarized in Table 12.c-1. In addition to these
observed species, there is the potential for butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis) to occur
within wetland habitats containing cypress.
Table 12.C-1
Listed Plant Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary
Tilfandsia balbisiana
Tillandsia ruinosa
Tillandsia fasciculata
Acroslichum spp.
Tilfandsia utriculata
FDA =
FWS =
E =
T =
C =
NL =
Reflexed wild
Fuzz -wuzz
Common wild
Leather fern
Giant wild ine
411,434,625,630
621,624,625,630
621,624,630
617,621,630
621,624,630
T
E
E
EorC
E
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered
Threatened
Commercially Exploited
Not listed
Gros canadensis ratensis
sterla americana
Aramus uarauna
Pol borus lancus audubonii
E retta tricolor
E retta caerulea
E refta thula
Eudocimus a/bus
A "aia a"a"a
S eo 0 cunicu/aria
Florida sandhill crane
Wood stork
Urn kin
Audubon's crested caracara
Tricolor heron
Little blue heron
Sno ret
White ibis
Roseate S oonbill
Burrowin owl
Listed wildlife species that were observed on site are summarized in Table 12.c-2. The
only nesting activity noted on site involved the caracaras, which nested and bred
successfully in the very northeast corner of the site. Listed wildlife species that were not
observed on site, but have some potential to occur, are provided in Table 12.c-3,
FWe =
FWS
T =
NL =
SSC
E
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
OM.
03786-013-000.PDRI-28423
Table 12.C-2
Listed Wildlife Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary
211,212,310.641.643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
211,212.310
512,621.641.643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641.643
512,621.641,643
512,621,641,643
211,212.310,329,330
ssc
sse
ssc
sse
sse
sse
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Threatened
Not listed
Species of Special Concern
Endangered
12-14
J"
t,
Table i2.C-3
Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur On Site But Were Not Observed.
Falco spaNerius paulus
A helacoma coerulescens
Haliaeetus leucoce halus
211, 212,214
411
411,416,625
Felis conc%r co i
Sciurus ni er avicennia
Ursus americanus floridanus
321, 400, 600 codes
411,416,621,624,625
411,434
i;~1i::~..i.d:
*Go heros I hemus
Drymarchon cou ri
Go her tortoise sse
Eastern indo 0 snake T
Low
Low
FWC =
FWS =
E =
T =
SSC =
NL =
Habitat =
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Endangered
Threatened
Species of Special Concern
Not Listed
Major FLUCCS categories in which indicated species are potentially most likely to occur.
D. Indicate what impact development of the site will pose to affected state or federally
listed wildlife and plant resources.
The listed plant species indicated in Table 12.c-1 are routinely found in the large,
contiguous native vegetation communities that occur on the western border of the Town. In
contrast, occurrence of these species within the project site are sporadic, particularly
because the on-site vegetation has been heavily impacted by prior disturbance, invasive
exotic species infestations, and altered hydroperiods. Mitigation (wetland/habitat
enhancement) for on-site wetland impacts is planned to occur within the large systems just
outside (west) of the property, and will maintain suitable environments for these plants to
thrive.
The species named in Table 12.c-2 opportunistically utilize the active agricultural areas on
the Town site for foraging, and similar habitats are widespread throughout eastern Collier
County, As mentioned in the response to Question iDA-A, the RLSA entitlement program
results in protection for large areas of native vegetation and agriculture, These mixed
landscapes, protected from development and conditional uses via the RLSA program,
provide long-term conservation of habitats that support these species.
E. Discuss what measures are proposed to be taken to mitigate impacts to state and
federally listed wildlife and plant resources. If protection is proposed to occur on-
site, describe what legal instrument will be used to protect the site, and what
management actions will be taken to maintain habitat value. If protection is
proposed to occur off-site, identify the proposed amount and type of lands to be
mitigated as well as whether mitigation would be through a regional mitigation land
bank, by acquisition of lands that adjoin existing public holdings, or by other means.
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: Oll- MPERRY
0-
03786-01:3-000-PDRl-26423
12-15
8e
Habitat protection for listed plant and wildlife species will occur on approximately 20,000
acres of land, as part of the RLSA development entitlement process. These lands are
dedicated by legal easement agreements to Collier County and the state of Florida, and
occur within or adjoining regionally significant resources such as Camp Keais Strand, the
Okaloacoochee Slough, and the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge. Since the
impacts are occurring primarily on agricultural lands with low environmental value, the lands
protected under the RLSA program obviate the need for standard mitigation practices.
REFERENCES
Beever III, J.W. 2002. Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD
ERP Projects. Second edition. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Office
of Environmental Services. Punta Gorda, Florida. 44 pp.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation), 1999. Florida land use, cover and forms
classification Should you have any questions, please contact me. stem. Third edition.
Tallahassee, Florida.
FGFWFC (Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission). 1988. Wildlife Methodology
Guidelines for Section 18.0 of the Application for Development Approval. Office of
Environmental Services. Tallahassee, Florida. 14 pp.
FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission). 1997. Florida's endangered
species, threatened species, and species of special concern: official lists. Tallahassee,
Florida.
FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission). 2004, Florida's endangered
species, threatened species, and species of special concern: official lists. Tallahassee,
Florida. 10 pp. Available online at: http://wildflorida.orq/imperiled/pdq/Endanqered-
Threatened-Special-Concern-2004.pdf (last accessed 7/10/04).
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
=
037Se-01J"OOo-PDRJ_26423
12-16
8e
QUESTION 13 - WETLANDS
A. If there are wetlands on the site, discuss and specify the following:
1. Acreage and percentage of property which is currently wetlands. These
wetlands should be shown on Map F, Vegetation Associations and identified
by individual reference numbers. (These numbers should be utilized in
responding to the other sub-questions,)
SFWMD has field reviewed jurisdictional wetland delineations on the northern half of the
Town. and has exerted jurisdiction over 359.1 acres of wetlands. Within the southern
portion of the Town. we anticipate that an estimated 80.1 acres will be declared as
jurisdictional wetlands by SFWMD. Therefore. the total acreage of SFWMD jurisdictional
wetlands present on site is estimated to be 439.2 acres, or 8.8 percent of the site. SFWMD
"Other Surface Water" (OSW) features (large agricultural canals) comprise 25.4 acres.
Based upon these wetland and OSW acreages. uplands therefore account for
approximately 91 percent of the Town area.
Individual wetlands within the project site were numbered sequentially. and are listed in
Table 13.A-1 with their corresponding acreages. Vegetation associations for each of the
wetlands may be readily determined by comparing Map F-1 (FLUCCS) and Map F-2
(Wetlands).
2. Historic hydroperiods and seasonal water elevations of on-site wetlands.
All of the wetland areas on-site exhibit a severely altered hydrologic regime due to
permitted agricultural water management practices. where excess water during the rainy
season is pumped into wetland areas or simply held in storage. The existing agricultural
operations on-site utilize a complex system of berms. ditches. canals (major water
conveyances), and pumps to provide irrigation and drainage. The agricultural water
management system heavily influences natural sheetflow and shallow water-table aquifer
dynamics, generally increasing the magnitude and rate of water level fluctuations on a
daily and seasonal basis. The net effect of the water management activities is to produce
extreme variations in wetland hydroperiod as compared to natural hydroperiod
fluctuations.
Evidence for these extreme hydroperiod variations includes direct visual observation of
water-level fluctuations over time; extensive encroachment of upland plants into wetland
areas; indicators of plant stress in both wetland and upland species (drought responses.
chlorosis. necrosis due to submergence. etc.); and seasonal die-offs of upland
vegetation in the wet season and wetland vegetation in the dry season. The present
hydroperiods within these wetlands are inadequate to support healthy wetland
vegetation communities, and are so altered that they are difficult to characterize.
Within the wetlands on the project site, none of the standard hydrobiological indicators
(drift lines. adventitious roots. moss collars. water staining, etc.) provided consistent data
for determining average wet season or seasonal high water (SHW) levels. In many cases.
hydrobiological indicators were not present. In other cases. the indicators were too
variable to determine a single water level. even within short distances. Therefore, no
average wet season or seasonal high water data are currently available.
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~
03786.013-00o.-PDRI-2M23
13-1
,''''D .. ...
j! ; r
~fl
Table 13.A-1
SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland Acreages
SFWMD Wetland # Wetland Acreage
1 2.2
2 1.8
3 13.2
4 28.7
5 2.8
6 2.2
7 6,1
8 3.0
9 0.8
10 67.6
11 7.1
12 0.4
13 0.9
14 0.9
15 0.9
16 14,5
17 5.5
18 40.8
19 3.6
20 0.4
21 6.5
22 31.0
23 16.7
24 10.4
25 43.0
26 11.9
27 0.9
28 0.3
29 3.9
30 4.3
31 25.4
32 1.6
33 62.8
34 3.9
35 3.6
36 3.3
37 4.0
38 2.6
TOTALS 439.2
3. Acreage and location of wetlands which are to be preserved in their natural or
existing state, including proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations
and methods for preservation.
Due to the generally low quality of on-site wetlands, preservation of many wetland areas in
their existing state is not ecologically effective. The high levels of invasive exotic infestation
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
,-
03786.013-00o-PDRI-28423
13-2
8e
in the on site wetlands, often combined with dense growth of nuisance species such as
primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), would essentially require an enormous sustained
effort to achieve wetland restoration success criteria. Even if success were achieved, the
on-site wetlands would be surrounded by development, limiting their habitat value to
wetland-dependent species. The site design deliberately avoided impacting the large
contiguous wetlands present within the project vicinity, as their value to listed species and
water quality is much greater than the on-site wetlands.
Approximately 62 acres of wetland preserve are incorporated into the master plan. Details
on proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations, and methods for preservation are
being developed in close coordination with SFWMD during the ERP permitting process.
4. Acreage and location of areas to be enhanced, including proposed
hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations and methods of enhancement
Approximately 48 acres within and surrounding Wetland #25, and 14 acres within Wetland
#33, will be restored and preserved in post-development.
5. Actions taken to minimize or mitigate impacts on wetland areas, including
maintaining the hydro period and providing buffers.
The site selection process achieved the broad goal of identifying project lands that
generally avoided wetland impacts. The effect of this site selection on overall wetland
impacts cannot be overstated, as there are few 5000-acre areas in southwest Florida that
have such a low proportion of on-site wetlands (8.8 percent) as this site. A review of the
Town of Ave Maria aerial imagery (Map B) illustrates that the project boundary was
delineated in a manner that deliberately avoided the large wetland systems present in the
project vicinity. The proposed main entrance road coincides with an existing agricultural
haul road, and surface water management lakes on the project periphery do not encroach
into wetland areas,
As noted, wetland impacts are proposed for systems that are already heavily impacted, by
invasive exotic infestation and/or secondary hydrologic impacts due to agriculture. To put
these impacts into perspective, consider that approximately 120 acres of proposed
wetland impacts in the northeastern portion of the site occur in wet improved pasture that
is dominated by torpedo grass (>75 percent cover). Another 91 acres of on-site wetlands
consist of Brazilian pepper monocultures that have minimal ecological value. Together,
these areas alone account for nearly half of all on-site wetlands, and more than half of the
total proposed wetland impact acreage.
As mitigation for the proposed impacts to these low-quality, fragmented wetlands, the
applicant proposes to enhance/restore portions of the large contiguous wetland systems
just outside the western property boundary. The hydroperiods of these systems are
relatively robust and are ultimately controlled by the regional hydrology of Camp Keais
Strand, and thus more or less dependent upon natural hydrologic factors.
This mitigation will ultimately provide a far greater ecological benefit to the local and
regional environment than the preservation of the scattered, low-value on-site wetlands.
Additionally, it should be noted that the SSAs that were protected to entitle the Project
contain thousands of acres of wetlands that are no longer subjected to development
7/23/2004- 135526 Ver. 01!_ MPERRY
,-
OJ7&6--01J_OOQ-PDRI_2842J
13-3
8C
pressures (Le., development rights were or will be removed), and the RLSA program itself
effectively results in a cap on cumulative impacts within eastern Collier County.
Buffers for preserved and/or enhanced wetlands will adhere to ERP wetland buffer
requirements, Local land development code regulations within the RLSA require a 300-
foot open space buffer between Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) and developed
areas, if the flowway is not already buffered by a Habitat Stewardship Area (HSA) or
agricultural Water Retention Area (WRA). The code also requires that no turf groundcover
may occur within the first 200 feet of the buffer, eliminating golf fairways/greens and
promoting native vegetation plantings or enhancements adjacent to offsite flow ways.
6. Acreage and location of wetlands which will be disturbed or altered, including
a discussion of the specific alterations and disturbances.
Based upon the estimated jurisdictional wetland acreage and the master plan, a total of
approximately 377 acres of wetland will be either filled for development or excavated for
surface water management lakes. More than half of the impact acreage occurs within wet
pastures dominated by torpedo grass, and wetlands containing Brazilian pepper
monocultures. Portions of wetland #25 and wetland #33 will be retained and enhanced.
7. Precautions to be taken during construction to protect wetland areas.
Prior to commencement of construction, the limits of wetland preserves in #25 and #33 will
be staked and roped to prevent encroachment by construction activities. In addition, best
management practices for erosion control will be implemented during construction of the
project. Prior to commencement of construction, erosion control devices will be installed
where appropriate to control and reduce soil erosion, sediment transport, and turbidity.
Such devices, which include haybale barriers, silt fencing, sediment booms, and temporary
sediment traps, will remain in place throughout the duration of construction until
construction zones and surrounding areas are stabilized.
8. If available, provide jurisdictional detenninations.
Map F-2, the SFWMD Wetlands Map, indicates verified and pending SFWMD Jurisdictional
Wetland Detenninations.
B. Provide any proposed plans (conceptual or specific) for created or enhanced
wetland areas, including littoral lake slopes, buffers, vegetative species to be
planted, etc.
The master plan has not been finalized to the degree where detailed proposed plans for
wetland enhancemenVcreation are available. The speCific information sought by this
question will be developed and reported through close cooperation with SFWMD and FWC
during the ERP permitting process.
7/23J200.4-135525 Ver. Ot!- MPERRY
,-,
037!l6-013"OOo-PDRI-28423
13-4
8e
t~
QUESTION 14 - WATER
A. Describe the existing hydrologic conditions (both ground and surface water) on and
abutting the site, including identification and discussion of any potential aquifer
recharge areas. Please identify and describe any outstanding Florida Waters, Wild
and Scenic Rivers, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or II Waters that
occur within, abutting or downstream of the site.
The Town of Ave Maria is located on land that includes farm fields currently permitted for
irrigation water use. The existing agricultural operations are permitted to withdraw from
the water table and Lower Tamiami aquifers. Proposed withdrawals for potable supply
and irrigation use will be less than the agricultural withdrawals currently permitted at the
site. Ave Maria will utilize the Lower Tamiami aquifer for potable uses and will utilize
reclaimed water and the Lower Tamiami aquifer for irrigation uses.
The geology and hydrology of Collier County has been described in reports by the
Florida Geologic Survey (McCoy, 1962; Klein, 1972; Campbell, 1988), the South Florida
Water Management District (Peacock, 1983; Knapp et ai, 1986), and by various authors
and consultants (Missimer & Associates, 1983a, 1983b, 1986, 1988, and 1990). A
partial bibliography is given at the end of this section (Question 14). Pertinent
information on the regional geology and hydrology are presented herein to provide a
framework for understanding the local hydrologic conditions and factors influencing
them. The stratigraphic terminology used conforms to that presented in the Florida
Geological Survey (FGS) Special Publication 28 and Bulletin 59 (Scott, 1988).
The Town is located directly south of the area of southwest Florida generally known as
the Immokalee Rise. The rise is a plateau of land that lies predominantly in Hendry
County but extends into eastern Lee County and northeastern Collier County with a
range of elevations from approximately 25 to 40 feet above National Geodedic Vertical
Datum (NGVD) dipping gently to the southwest (Campbell, 1988). Most of western
Collier County has elevations ranging from 0 to 15 feet NGVD. The slope from the
coastal areas of western Collier County to the rise is approximately one foot per mile.
East of Immokalee is an area known as the Big Cypress Spur, which is a transition area
between the Immokalee Rise and the Everglades. Elevations in the Spur are slightly
higher than Western Collier and the Everglades but lower than the Immokalee Rise. The
study area represents a source of recharge for both the urban areas of Collier County
(western Collier County) and the Big Cypress Spur. A map of the topography in the
vicinity of the Town is presented as Figure 14A-1.
GEOLOGY
Southwest Florida is underlain by nearly 18,000 feet of sedimentary rocks. Freshwater
occurs only within the upper few hundred feet of this sequence, and hence, a more
detailed description of both the geology and the aquifer systems of this interval is
provided. A general description of the deeper geology to approximately 3,000 feet below
land surface is also provided. In Collier County the deeper brackish aquifers are used
as reverse osmosis plant feedwater sources and for underground storage of fresh water.
In addition, the deeper saline water formations are used as injection zones for the
disposal of treated wastewater and membrane water treatment plant concentrate. A
generalized hydrostratigraphic column of the sediments underlying the project site is
provided as Figure 14A-2.
7/23/2004-135531 Ver:01!_MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-1
~. 8e
r
A description of the geologic formations and aquifers that occur in the vicinity of the
project site is provided below. The geologic and hydrogeologic units are described from
youngest to oldest Geologist logs for selected wells in the vicinity of the Town are
attached as Tables 14A-1 through 14A - 3.
Pamlico Sand
The uppermost and youngest formation encountered in Collier County is the Pamlico
Sand. The Pamlico Sand is Late Pleistocene in age and is present at the surface
throughout much of South Florida. At the Town site this unit ranges in thickness from
about 6 to 20 feet The Pamlico Sand consists predominantly of fine to medium-grained
quartz sand, with lesser amounts of shell, detrital clays and organic constituents. Shell
fragments (mostly bivalves) and organic fragments (fossil roots) are commonly present
The permeability of the Pamlico Sand is generally medium to low (10 to 100 ft/day)
depending on the quantity of secondary constituents.
Ft ThompsonlTamiami Formation
The Pamlico Sand is underlain by the Pleistocene age Fort Thompson Formation and
the Pliocene age Tamiami Formation. The lithology of the Fort Thompson Formation is
highly variable and includes fresh-water, marine, and brackish water limestones, marls,
sands, and shells. The Pliocene-aged Tamiami Formation, which unconformably lies
below the Fort Thompson Formation, is also lithologically highly variable. At least nine
mappable members or facies have been identified in the Tamiami Formation in
southwestern Florida, and includes such diverse lithologies as marts, sands and
sandstones, dolosilt, and limestone (Missimer, 1992). Differentiation of the various
members and facies of the Fort Thompson Formation and Tamiami Formation is not
always readily apparent using well cuttings descriptions.
The limestone and marl present between approximately 6 and 80 feet at the Town site
are assigned to the Tamiami Formation. In central Collier County, the Tamiami
Formation consists of three distinct mappable units. These members in order of
increasing depth are the Pinecrest Limestone, the Bonita Springs Marl, and the Ochopee
Limestone. The Bonita Springs Marl, which consists of a green to gray carbonate mud,
forms a confining unit separating the two permeable limestone units. The Bonita Springs
Marl thins out or is absent in southern Collier County and in certain areas of northern
Collier County. At the Town site, an olive gray clay to light gray carbonate mud or marl
beds, which occur in the depth interval typically from approximately 25 to 37 feet are
assigned to the Bonita Spring Marl Member of the Tamiami Formation.
The Ochopee Limestone member comprises most of the Tamiami Formation at the
Town project site. The Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation was
named by Mansfield (1939) for the light gray to white sandy fossiliferous limestone that
crops out near the town of Ochopee in Collier County (Hunter, 1968). According to
Hunter (1968), the Ochopee Member typically is light gray to white calcarenite that has
an extensive development of secondary porosity formed by the dissolution of the
aragonitic shells of mollusks. Well-preserved pectens, oysters, barnacles, and echinoids
are also present The large interconnected molds give the unit a very high permeability.
7123/2004- 135531 V'" Ot'~ MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-2
rac
The Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation is present from
approximately 60 ft below land surface (bls) to more than 80 ft bls at the project site.
Hawthorn Group
The Hawthorn Group underlies the Tamiami Formation unconformably, and is a
lithologically complex sequence of phosphate bearing sediments. The Miocene age
Hawthorn Group is comprised of an upper, primarily siliciclastic unit (Peace River
Formation), and a lower, primarily carbonate unit (Arcadia Formation). The two
formations are separated by a major regional disconformity.
The Peace River Formation of the Hawthorn Group consists of sandstones, sands,
dolomitic clays or dolosilt, and fossil shell material. The formation occurs from 80 to
approximately 300 feet below land surface. Stratigraphically, the uppermost member of
the Peace River Formation is the Lehigh Acres Sandstone. The unit is a light gray to tan
sandstone that is interbedded with fine-grained, quartz sand and abundant shells and
phosphate. Commonly, the percentage of unconsolidated sand increases with depth.
The contact with the overlying Ochopee Limestone appears to be gradational at the
project site. The Peace River Formation serves as a confining unit which separates the
SurficiallTamiami aquifer from the underlying Intermediate Aquifer System. The total
thickness of the formation at the project site is estimated to be about 200 feet.
The Arcadia Formation of the Hawthorn Group is composed of limestones with
interbedded marls, and dolosilts. The top of the formation is anticipated to occur at
approximately 300 feet at the project site. The limestones are light to yellowish gray
micrites and biomicrites with moderate to good porosity. Water bearing zones in the
limestones having moderate to good porosity comprise the Intermediate Aquifer System
at the site. Phosphate is a common accessory mineral in the various lithology types
occurring in the Arcadia Formation. The base of the Arcadia Formation in Southwest
Florida can be identified by an abrupt decrease in phosphate content in lithologic
samples and an attenuation of gamma ray activity on geophysical logs. Based on
information obtained from nearby deep wells, the base of the Hawthorn Group is
anticipated to occur at about 700 feet below land surface at the project site.
Suwannee Limestone
Carbonate rock and sediments of the Oligocene age Suwannee Limestone underlie the
Hawthorn Group. This regional stratigraphic unit ranges between 350 and 450 feet in
thickness in Collier County. The lithologic character of the Suwannee Limestone is
significantly different as compared to the overlying phosphatic Hawthorn rock and
sediments. The Suwannee Limestone consists mainly of interbedded calcarenites
(grainstones) and other types of "clean" limestone, with only minor amounts of
phosphorite and clastic sediments.
Ocala Limestone
The Ocala Limestone, upper Eocene in age, disconformably underlies the rock and
sediments of the Suwannee Limestone. The Ocala Limestone can often be separated
into an upper and lower member. The upper member is a soft, white, chalky, porous
coquina consisting of specimens of larger foraminifera such as Lepidoeyelina oea/ana.
The lower member is a light cream-colored limestone that is generally harder than the
7/2312004- 135531 V<x: 01'. MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-3
8e
"_.,,
upper member, and commonly contains molds of small millolids. Limited data available
on the Ocala Limestone in Collier County indicate that these late Eocene deposits are
between 300 and 400 feet thick in the area.
Avon Park Limestone
The Avon Park Limestone is predominantly a light brown to tan dolomite with
interbedded limestone. The Avon Park Limestone is middle Eocene in age, and
contains distinct and abundant microfossils, including Cosknoline f10ridina and
Dictyoconus cookei. The unit is thickest in southern Florida with between 400 and 600
feet of rock and sediments. Highly cavernous zones may exist in the lower Avon Park
dolomitic section.
Oldsmar Limestone
The Oldsmar Limestone is lithologically similar to the overlying Avon Park Limestone.
Delineation between the two formations is possible through identification of microfauna
occurring in the Oldsmar Limestone including, in descending abundance, Helicostegina
gyralis, Psedophragmina cedarkeysensis, and Coskinolina elongata. Gypsum and some
chert are also found in these lower Eocene age deposits. Large cavernous voids are
commonly encountered to produce a "boulder zone" with an extremely high
transmissivity. These rocks and sediments are approximately 1,200 feet thick beneath
Collier County. Depths to the high transmissivity zone may range from about 2,200 to
3,300 feet below surface. This zone is commonly utilized for the disposal of domestic
wastewater and membrane concentrate in South Florida.
Geologist's logs from wells MC~5001 and MC-5075 and a soil boring log of well B-327
are provided at the end of this discussion as Tables 14A-1 through 14A-3. Well MC-
5001 is located approximately 5 miles west of the project site, and well MC-5075 is
located approximately 1 mile northeast of the project site. The soil boring log is from a
well were drilled on the Ave Maria project site.
GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY
Three major aquifer systems are present in Collier County. They are, in descending
order, the Surficial Aquifer System, the Intermediate Aquifer System, and the Floridan
Aquifer System. The aquifer systems are typically well separated and pumpage from
one system usually does not significantly affect the others. The Sandstone aquifer,
which is described below, is considered part of the Intermediate Aquifer System.
However, in portions of Collier County, the Sandstone aquifer is hydraulically connected
to the Lower Tamiami and water-table aquifers. It has been suggested that the
Sandstone aquifer be moved into the Surficial Aquifer System (Missimer, Martin 2001).
For the purposes of this report, this aquifer will be described as part of the Intermediate
Aquifer System to coincide with current publications.
The aquifers within each system are separated by confining beds, which generally do
not provide complete hydraulic separation, but to varying degrees, allow water to leak
between the aquifers. The rate and direction at which leakage occurs depends on the
vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit and the potentiometric head
differential between the adjacent aquifers, both natural and pumping induced.
7/2312004.-135531 Ve<:011,IJPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-4
A schematic diagram showing the formations and lithologies present within ~:cB k
aquifer systems is provided in Figure 14A - 2. Descriptions of the aquifer systems and
of the individual aquifers with the most water supply potential in each system are
provided below.
Surficial Aquifer Svstem I Water Table Aquifer
The Surficial Aquifer System is comprised of the water-table aquifer and Lower Tamiami
aquifer. The water-table aquifer in Collier County occurs within the Pleistocene-aged
Pamlico Sand, Fort Thompson Formation, and the unnamed limestone facies or the
Pinecrest Limestone member of the Pliocene-aged Tamiami Formation. The Pamlico
Sand consists primarily of medium to fine-grained quartz sand with varying amounts of
secondary constituents including shell, detrital clays, and organic material. Thickness of
the unit ranges from 0 to 15 feet in the study area. Permeability is generally medium to
low depending upon the quantity of secondary constituents (Missimer & Associates,
1986).
In areas where the Pamlico Sand is very thin or absent, a hard, sandy limestone or
calcareous sandstone is frequently encountered. These lithologies are characteristic of
the Fort Thompson Formation which also contains beds of quartz sand and thin beds of
dense, hard, freshwater limestone in some locations (Missimer & Associates, 1991).
The Lower Tamiami aquifer of the Surficial Aquifer System occurs within the upper part
of the Tamiami Formation in most of Collier County. The predominant lithology is a
sandy, highly fossiliferous limestone with varying quantities of mollusk shells, corals,
bryozoans, and barnacles. The limestone unit is characterized by abrupt changes in
thickness and often has a high permeability caused by the secondary dissolution of
aragonitic shell material. This secondary dissolution creates an abundance of mold and
cast type porosity, which greatly enhances the storage and flow of water. Thickness of
this limestone unit increases to the north and east in Collier County where it exceeds 60
feet in parts of northern Collier County. The overall thickness of the Surficial Aquifer
System generally ranges from 30 to 90 feet in northern Collier County. Low permeability
sediments consisting primarily of carbonate clays, fine sand, silt, and shell form the base
of the water-table aquifer in most of the study area. This unit thins and thickens
erratically and is absent in some areas (SFWMD 86-1). Where the confining unit is
absent, the water-table aquifer is in direct hydraulic connection with the Lower Tamiami
aquifer and both units are under unconfined conditions and should be termed the water-
table aquifer. In this case, the water-table aquifer can exceed 100 feet in thickness.
The hydraulic characteristics of the water-table aquifer vary considerably depending on
both thickness and lithologic character. A map showing the transmissivity of the water-
table aquifer is provided as Figure 14A - 3. This map was generated using data input
files from the SFWMD western Collier County groundwater flow model (April 1992). In
the northwestern portion of Collier County, where the limestone layers are thinner,
transmissivity values range from 50,000 gpdlft to 300,000 gpd/ft. In the southeastern
parts of the study area where thick, highly permeable, reefal limestones occur, aquifer
transmissivity values can exceed 1,000,000 gpdlft (Missimer & Associates, 1986). The
porosities in the reefal limestone areas can exceed 50 percent with correspondingly high
specific yield values.
7/2312004-135531 Voc011-MPERRY
03786-013-000-_0
14-5
8e
By definition, the water-table aquifer is unconfined or in direct contact with atmospheric
pressure. However, the sediments in the upper part of the aquifer often have much
lower permeabilities than the underlying limestone units, which causes the aquifer to
respond to pumpage as a semi-unconfined unit in some locations (using the definitions
of Kruseman and DeRidder, 1991).
The primary source of recharge to the water-table aquifer is direct infiltration and
percolation of rainfall. Other minor sources include lateral inflow, percolation from septic
tanks and holding ponds, and infiltration from canals and lakes when their stages exceed
the altitude of the water table. Discharge from the water-table aquifer occurs by way of
evaporation, transpiration by plants, lateral flow into canals, lakes, and ultimately, the
Gulf of Mexico, leakage into underlying aquifers, and from the pumping of wells.
The highest water levels in the Northern Collier County occur where land surface
elevations are highest. Water levels generally decrease to the south and southwest
following the slope of the land (Figure 14A -1). Water levels in the aquifer vary on a
seasonal basis. During the summer rainy season, water levels often approach or
exceed land surface. The natural difference in wet season and dry season water levels
frequently exceeds 5 feet. Because the water-table aquifer is unconfined, it can be
directly affected by alterations in drainage.
Lower Tamiami Aauifer
A low permeability, sandy, sometimes shelly, carbonate clay commonly referred to as
the Bonita Springs Marl separates the water-table aquifer from the underlying Lower
Tamiami aquifer in northern Collier County, including the vicinity of the Ave Maria DR!.
The thickness of the confining beds ranges between 0 and 50 feet and averages
approximately 30 feet on the project site. Drawdown in the water-table due to pumpage
of the Lower Tamiami aqUifer will be dampened or eliminated where suitable
confinement is present.
The Lower Tamiami aquifer occurs within the Ochopee member of the Tamiami
Formation. The Ochopee Member consists primarily of light gray to white, sandy,
fossiliferous limestones. The dissolution of shell material creates large interconnecting
shell molds that give the unit a high permeability. The thickness of the Ochopee ranges
between approximately 40 and 150 feet in northeastern Collier County.
The hydraulic characteristics of the Lower Tamiami aquifer are variable. Over 30 aquifer
performance tests have been conducted on the aquifer in Collier County by the SFWMD
and private consultants. Transmissivity values range from approximately 75,000 gpd/ft
in northwest Collier County to over 500,000 gpd/ft in the northeast. A contour map
showing the transmissivity of the Lower Tamami aquifer is included as Figure 14A - 5.
This map was generated using data input files from the SFWMD western Collier County
groundwater flow model (April 1992). The transmissivity increases greatly to the
southwest of the project site in Golden Gates Estates. The Lower Tamiami aquifer is
currently the primary source for public water supply, agricultural, and industrial supply in
Collier County.
The potentiometric surface of the Lower Tamami aquifer varies on a seasonal and
regional basis in Collier County. Water levels range from near land surface during the
wet season in undeveloped areas to 15 feet or more below land surface near centers of
7/2312004-135531 Vaf011_MPERRY
037ll6-01J.-()()()"'-O
14-6
Be
pumpage during the dry season. The regional flow direction is to the south and
southwest, generally perpendicular to the land surface contours, with hydraulic gradients
that approximately range from 0.25 to 1.25 feet per mile. Steeper hydraulic gradients
and radial flow conditions are encountered near large centers of pumpage such as
municipal or agricultural wellfields.
Recharge to the aquifer occurs primarily by downward leakage from the water-table
aquifer through the overlying semi-confining beds. The potentiometric surface of the
Lower Tamiami aquifer is generally lower than the surface of the water-table aquifer
except very near major surface drainage features or where the confinement is absent.
This results in continuous downward leakage from the water-table aquifer to the Lower
Tamiami aquifer. The amount of leakage depends upon the overall vertical hydraulic
conductivity of the confining unit and the magnitude of the difference in the
potentiometric levels of the aquifers. Therefore, recharge to the Lower Tamiami aquifer
is typically greatest near centers of pumpage from the aquifer. Discharge from the
Lower Tamiami aquifer occurs primarily from lateral flow to the Gulf of Mexico and from
the pumping of wells.
Intermediate AQuifer Svsteml Sandstone AQuifer
In the vicinity of the Town, the Lower Tamiami aquifer is often hydraulically connected to
the Sandstone aquifer, which is generally considered the uppermost hydrologic unit of
the Intermediate Aquifer System. The Sandstone aquifer consists of moderate to low
permeability calcareous cemented quartz sands, sandstone, and sandy limestone that
belong to the upper part of the Peace River Formation of the Hawthorn Group. The
aquifer is commonly used for agricultural irrigation in eastern Lee and Hendry Counties
(SFWMD, 1986). The transmissivity of the aquifer is generally high in the vicinity of the
Town as shown on Figure 14A - 6. This figure was generated using data obtained from
the SFWMD groundwater flow model of western Collier County (April 1992). The
potentiometric surface of the Sandstone aquifer is similar to that of the Lower Tamiami
aquifer because the two units are hydraulically connected. A confining unit separates
the aquifers in Lee and northwestern Collier County so that a difference in the
potentiometric surface exists between the aquifers in these areas.
The base of the Sandstone aquifer is marked by an abrupt lithologic transition to the
highly impermeable pale olive to greenish-gray clays and marls of the middle and lower
Peace River Formation. These sediments form the upper Hawthorn confining zone.
The upper Hawthorn confining unit ranges in thickness from approximately 100 to 150
feet in the county. The considerable thickness and low permeability of the clays and
marls result in good confinement between the Sandstone aquifer and the underlying
Hawthorn Zone I aquifer.
Hawthorn Zone I AQuifer
The Hawthorn Zone I aquifer occurs within permeable limestone units that belong to the
upper Arcadia Formation of the Hawthorn Group. The upper contact of the Hawthorn
Zone I aquifer is marked by a sharp contact of a pale olive clay of the upper Hawthorn
confining unit with a very light gray limestone. The predominant lithologies within the
aquifer are very light gray to pale olive limestone layers, partially separated from each
other by thin layers of dolomitic limestone. The limestones consist mostly of fine-grained
wackestones that are cemented to varying degrees, The limestones are moderately
7/2312004-135531 Ver: 011-MPERRY
03786-013-lJOO._O
14-7
r~
8e
hard to hard, and usually have moderate to high porosity (both intergranular and moldic
porosity). Sand-sized phosphate grains are present throughout the aquifer, usually at
volumetric abundances on the order of 1 to 3%. The Hawthorn Zone I aquifer occurs at
depths of approximately 290 to 420 feet below land surface in the vicinity of the Town
and ranges in thickness from approximately 100 to 135 feet. The aquifer tends to thin
toward the north in Collier County.
At the base of the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer is a sequence of interbedded marls, clays,
and limestone units that belong to the Miocene-aged, middle Arcadia Formation. These
generally low permeability sediments form the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone, which
separates the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer from the underlying Lower Hawthorn aquifer of
the Floridan Aquifer System. The thickness of the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone
averages over 150 feet in the vicinity of the Town and the overall vertical hydraulic
conductivity of the unit is very low. Transmissivities of the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer
range from 20,000 to approximately 100,000 gpd/ft (SCRWTP report, CDM Missimer,
2000).
Floridan Aauifer Svsteml Lower Hawthorn Aauifer
The Lower Hawthorn aquifer lies beneath the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone and is the
uppermost unit in the Floridan Aquifer System. The Floridan Aquifer System is
regionally extensive and underlies all of Florida and parts of Alabama, Georgia, and
South Carolina. It is used for potable and irrigation water supply in many parts of
Florida.
The upper boundary of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer is marked by a sharp decrease in
the marl and clay content in the lower Arcadia Formation. The Lower Hawthorn aquifer
consists predominantly of interbedded yellowish-gray fossiliferous limestones and pale
olive dolomites. The limestones consist mostly of wackestones with secondary porosity
and a minor amount of very fine to medium-grained carbonate sand that is lithified to
varying degrees. The Lower Hawthorn aquifer limestones are generally moderately hard
and have a moderate to high porosity. The Lower Hawthorn dolomites have a
microsucrosic texture, are very hard, and have variable porosity. The top of the Lower
Hawthorn aquifer occurs at depths ranging from less than 600 to over 800 feet in the
county, dipping to the southeast. The thickness of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer ranges
from approximately 100 to 200 feet.
The hydraulic characteristics of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer are variable in Collier
County. Transmissivity values for the Lower Hawthorn aquifer can range from 10,000
gpd/ft to over 2,000,000 gpdlft over relatively short lateral distances (SCRWTP Report,
CDM Missimer, 2000). A hydraulic trend cannot accurately be evaluated given the high
variability and lack of data; however, the general tendency seems to be a set of ridges
running from northwest to southeast, which alternate with high and then low
transmissivity.
The potentiometric surface of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer is highest in the northeastern
part of the county and decreases to the southwest. The direction of groundwater flow
within the aquifer is therefore towards the southwest. Recharge to the aquifer is due
primarily to direct infiltration of precipitation where the aquifer is close to land surface in
the northern and central part of the state and leakage from other aquifers.
7/23/2004- 135531 Vor 01!- MPERRY
03786-D13-000--0
14-8
~8C
SELECTED REFERENCES
Campbell, Kenneth M., 1988, The Geology of Collier County, Florida: Florida Geological
Survey Open File Report No. 25, 14 pp.
CDM/Missimer International, Inc., 2000, Mediterra Phase I irrigation water wellfield
production well completion report: Consultants Report to Bonita Bay Properties,
Inc., Bonita Springs, Florida, 11 p.
Hunter, M.E., 1968, Molluscan Guide Fossils in Late Miocene Sediments of Southern
Florida: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, Vol. 18, p.
439-450.
Klein, Howard, 1954, Ground-Water Resources of the Naples Area, Collier County,
Florida: Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigations No. 11, 64 pp.
Klein, Howard, 1972, The Shallow Aquifer of Southwest Florida: Florida Geological
Survey Map Series No. 53.
Knapp, M.S., Burns, W,S., and Sharp, T.S., 1986, Preliminary Assessment of the
Groundwater Resources of Western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water
Management District, Technical Publication 86-1, 142pp.
Kruseman, G.P., and N.A. deRidder, 1991. Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data,
2nd ed. Internationallnst. for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI),
Wageningen, Publication no. 47, 377 pp.
Mansfield, W.C., 1939, Notes on the Upper Tertiary and Pleistocene Mollusks of
Peninsular Florida: Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No. 18, 57 pp.
McCoy, H. J., 1962, Ground-Water Resources of Collier County, Florida: Florida
Geological Survey Report of Investigations No. 31, 82 p.
Missimer, T. M., 1984, The Geology of South Florida: A Summary: in Environments of
South Florida Present and Past II, P. J. Gleason, ed., Miami Geological Society
Memoir 2, P. 385 - 404.
Missimer T. M., 1992, Stratigraphic relationships of sediment facies within the Tamiami
Formation of southwestem Florida: proposed intraformational correlations, in T. M.
Scott and W. D. Allmon, eds., The Plio-Pliocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of
Southern Florida: Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 36, p. 63-92.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1983a, Location map of the Coral Reef aquifer in
northwestern Collier County, Florida: Report No. 156-83 to the Big Cypress Basin,
South Florida Water Management District, 26 p.
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1983b, Groundwater resources of the Cocohatchee
Watershed, Collier County, Florida: Phase III Hydraulic characteristics and yield of
the Coral Reef aquifer: Report No. 155-83 to the Big Cypress Basin, South Florida
Water Management District, 169 p.
7/2312004- 136531 V..,. 011-MPERRY
037~13-000-.0
14-9
1::',
8e
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1986, Hydrogeology of the Collier County Wellfield in
Golden Gate Estates, Collier County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier
County Board of County Commissioners, 125 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1987, Completion Report for the Collier County Regional
Wellfield Expansion at Golden Gate Estates: Consultants report to the Collier
County Utility Department, 98 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1988, A Preliminary Plan to Develop a Public Water Supply
Wellfield in Collier County, Florida: Verification of Hydraulic Properties within the
Lower Tamiami Aquifer: Consultants report to the Collier County Utilities
Administration, 78 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1990a, Safe Yield Determination by Three-Dimensional
Hydraulic Modeling of the Lower Tamiami Aquifer beneath Golden Gate Estates,
Collier County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners, 158 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1990b, Hydrologic Investigation to Evaluate Long Term
Resource Potential of the Hawthorn Aquifer System Zone II at the Unit 25 Parcel,
Marco, Island, Florida: Consultants report prepared for Southern States Utilities.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1991, Phase I Deep Aquifer Hydrogeologic Study, Collier
County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier County Utilities Division, 61 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1993, Phase II Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Project - Preliminary Report: Consultants report to the Collier County
Utilities Division, 58 pp.
Missimer, T. M., and Martin, W. K., 2001, Hydrogeology of Lee County, Florida in T. M.
Missimer and T. M. Scott, eds., Geology and hydrology of Lee County, Florida:
Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 49, p. 91-137.
Peacock, Roland, 1983, The Post Eocene Stratigraphy of Southern Collier County,
Florida: South Florida Water Management District, Technical Publication 83-5,
42pp.
Scott, T.M., 1988, The Lithostratigraphy of the Hawthorn Group (Miocene) of Florida:
Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No. 59, 148 pp.
Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Ad Hoc Committee on Florida
Hydrostratigraphic Unit Definition, 1986, Hydrogeology units of Florida: Florida
Geological Survey Special Publication No. 28, 8 pp.
B. Describe, in terms of appropriate water quality parameters, the existing ground and
surface water quality conditions on and abutting the site. (The appropriate
parameters and methodology should be agreed to by the regional planning council
and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication conference stage.)
Water quality in the water-table aquifer in most of the study area is typically good with
respect to salinity. However, the water generally has a dissolved iron concentration
7/23J2004- 135531 V.... 011- MPERRY
03786-013-000.--0
14-10
8e
above the drinking water standard and significant concentrations of organic acids that
often give the water a yellowish or brownish color. The presence of these compounds in
the water can cause treatment problems because of the potential for trihalomethane
(THM) or other disinfection-by-product (DBP) formation.
Water quality in the Lower Tamiami aquifer generally meets most state and federal
drinking water standards in much of Collier County. Dissolved chloride concentrations
typically range from less than 50 mg/l to 200 mg/L Where confinement from the water-
table aquifer is present, the Lower Tamiami contains water that is low in dissolved iron
and color. Iron content is high in the Lower Tamiami aquifer in wells where confinement
is poor. Water from the aquifer can be treated to meet the applicable drinking water
standards using conventional or membrane treatment methods.
Water quality sampling was conducted on six existing irrigation production wells at the
project site. The locations of the wells are shown in Figure 148 -1. Although specific
construction details were not available for each well, the water use permit records
indicate that production wells are generally completed from approximately 60 to 80 feet
into the Lower Tamiami aquifer.
The water samples were analyzed for the following parameters:
Specific conductance
Chloride
pH
Dissolved Solids
Temperature
Nitrate
Sulphate
Sulfide
Calcium
Iron
Total Hardness
Calcium Hardness
Results are listed in the attached Table 148 -1. The water quality analyses indicate
that most parameters were within normal concentrations, with the exception of iron
concentration in wells 3, 4 and 6, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) in well 6. The
maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for Primary and Secondary Drinking Water
Standards are listed in the Table. The hardness concentrations for all sampled wells
were higher than that considered acceptable for potable use. Additional sampling and
analysis for additional parameters was conducted on well #2 (BCC #30), which is
located at the proposed water treatment plant site. The results of three sampling events
at Well #2 are listed in Table 148 - 2. During the June sampling event pump problems
occurred. Anomalous results of certain parameters such as iron and color likely reflect
inadequate purging prior to sampling.
The results indicate that if this groundwater source is used for potable use, treatment
may have to address water softening and iron concentration issues. Although limited
sampling was conducted at the project site, experience in the area indicates that
relatively high iron concentrations can occur even in the confined aquifers. This is likely
attributable to a number of factors, including variable thickness of confining units, water
quality changes accompanying long term irrigation pumpage, or interaquifer leakage due
to well construction methods or current well condition.
In the Sandstone aquifer, water quality is generally good in the upper part of the aquifer,
with dissolved chloride concentrations of 250 mgll or less. However, salinity levels
typically increase with depth.
7/2312004-135531 V9f: 011- MPERRY
03786-013-000-_0
14-11
Be
Water quality in the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer is quite variable in Collier County.
Dissolved chloride concentrations range from less than 200 mg/I in the northeastern
section of the county to between 2000 and 3000 mg/I to the west and south. Although
there is not an abundance of data in the study area, water quality trends indicate that
dissolved chloride concentrations on the order of 200 mg/I are likely at the Town.
Water quality in the Lower Hawthorn aquifer varies greatly across Collier County.
Salinity in the Lower Hawthorn aquifer generally increases to the south and west in
Collier County. Dissolved chloride concentrations are likely greater than 1000 mg/I in
the vicinity of the Town and generally from 2000-3000 mg/I in other areas of Collier
County. The water is generally not suitable for individual, agricultural or industrial uses
without desalination treatment
C. Describe the measures which will be used to mitigate (or avoid where possible)
potential adverse effects upon ground and surface water quality, including any
resources identified in Subquestion A.
Measures which will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse effects upon surface water
and shallow groundwater at, and adjacent to the site, will include all proven effective
best management practices (BMP's) which are appropriate for the site. These will
include proper timing and minimum applications of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides
on landscaped areas of the property. Whenever possible, biodegradable varieties will
be utilized. Slow release nitrogen fertilizers will be used. A routine program of
coordination will be undertaken with the county extension office of the Soil Conservation
Service.
Irrigation of common areas and golf course areas will be performed by deep, infrequent
waterings in order to encourage deeper rooting of turf grass. This will allow the grass to
obtain more water and nutrients than a turf grass having a short root system due to
shallow, daily waterings. In addition, irrigation will be limited to the hours between dusk
and dawn to reduce the amount of water lost to evaporation. Production well locations
will be selected to minimize interference drawdown between the wells and drawdown
beneath on-site or adjacent wetland areas.
Best management practices will also be utilized to mitigate any adverse impacts from
stormwater runoff. The use of BMP's in the design of surface water management
systems is required by the SFWMD. The BMP's to be employed are discussed in the
response to Question 19, but will include utilization of detention ponds, dry retention
areas, and vegetative systems (grassed swales and filter strips). These features are
designed to provide runoff treatment to improve water quality through attenuation by
increasing storage retention and travel time prior to off-site discharge. Compliance with
applicable stormwater quality regulations will be achieved by utilizing BMP's in the
surface water management system design and verified through monitoring required by
conditions of the surface water management permit that will be issued by the SFWMD.
7/2312004-135531 Ver:01!-MPERRY
03786-013--000-_Cl
14-12
- Roads - Elevation Contours
- Ave Maria DRI
~@>
~
@
20
Ave Maria DRI
{s
o
'.,;'
20,000
~
~
FEET
sf
2O~
@
i 0 '\~ ----
Q.
~
" fJj
"
u
<
~
~
'"
"-
~
~
0
,
.
~ Contour Interval = 5 feet
~
u
Figure 14A . 1
CDM Ave Marla DRI
14-13 Topography of Northern Collier County
Series Formation
0 Pleistocene Pamlicol
F Surficial
Pliocene Tamiami Aquifer
100 System
200
Peace
River
300
a.
400 ::> Intermediate
e
Miocene (!) Aquifer
<:: System
~
0
500 .s;; 'r-
'i
'" ~r
:J: _r
~ Man, clay, Confining
600 Arcadia - ~ limestone,
~r_ yellowish gray, Beds
- low penneability
'--
~ - ~
-
<D 700 ~ -
<D
'=-
L:
-
a. 800
<D
0
900 Floridan
Aquifer
Oligocene Suwannee System
limestone
1000
1100
1200
i
z
Ocala
Group
~
g 1500
1J
~ D Sand El Sandstone ~ Clayl Marl ~ limestone and Marl ~ limestone ~Dolomite
,
J
1300
il.
~
3
a
o
~
.
Eocene
1400
Avon
Park
~
o
CDM
Figure 14A. 2
Ave Marla DRI
Generalized Hydrogeology Beneath Collier County
14-14
~
I
3
~
"
'&
;
..
~
~
~
~
~
.
~
u
- Roads -- Elevation Contours
- Ave Maria DRI
o
en
:;0
tv
<0
300~
//
~550-
m
<
CD
lCl
III
0.
CD
C/l
OJ
<"
0.
o
CD
en
o
~
o
OJ
<
0.
~
'"
A
20,000
FEET
-
Contour Interval = 250 gpdlft
CDM
Figure 14A-3
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Water Table Aquifer (1,000 gpdlft)
14-15
- Roads
- Elevation Contours
~
"
j.
z
m
<
<>>
~
co
Dr
a.
<>>
'"
III
<"
a.
o
<>>
C/l
o
6'
III
<"
a.
~
~
~
;
~
'"'
..
~
~
.
~
.
~
o
CDNI
l
- Ave Maria DRI
C/l
;;0
N
<0
2-0-------
'"
Ave Maria DRI
Oil Well Road
C/l
;;0
N
<0
~
o
20,000
FEET
Contour Interval = 25 feet
Figure 14A-4
Ave Maria DRI
Thickness of the Tamiami Confining Layer
14-16
- Roads
-
750000
--, Elevation Contours
-- Ave Maria DRI
o
\a ~
Va
Vo~
Ul
;;0
I\)
<0
.~
100000 -
CR 846
Immokalee Rd
Ul
;;0
I\)
<0
~
Ave Maria DRI
I~
.a
or
c.
eo
'"
OJ
<
c.
"
1
z
g
~
"
~
~
~
..
~
.,.
~
~
~
.
~
ij
CDM
o
eo
Ul
o
6"
OJ
<"
c.
~
N
A
20,000
FEET
Contour Interval = 200000 gpcl/ft
Figure 14A-5
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Lo_r Tamiami Aquifer (gpcl/ft)
14-17
- Roads
- Elevation Contours
- Ave Maria DRI
,.
..
N
A
0 20,000
FEET
S'?82
'",
~
o
1
z
~
~
~
.;
~
~
'"
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
u
(J)
:;tl
N
'"
Immokalee Rd
(J)
:;tl
N
'"
o
CD
(J)
o
-
o
OJ
<"
a.
~
&
<Ii
~
Contour Interval = 20000 gpcllft
CDM
Figure 14A-6
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Sandstone Aquifer (gpdlft)
14-18
~ 8e
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
Depth (feet)
Litholoov
0-5
Sand, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), quartz, fine-grained.
5-15
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) with some olive-gray (5 Y 4/1)
staining, texturally variable, cuttings range from biosparite to
biomicrite, hard, not friable, abundant large fossil fragments
(bivalves and gastropods).
15-20
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite, fossiliferous,
medium-grained, soft, friable, high visible porosity (intergranular to
less abundantly moldic after aragonitic fossils), some large fossil
(bivalves, minor bryozoans) fragments.
20-25
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), highly fossiliferous (bivalves), soft,
very low permeability, abundant large fossil (bivalve) fragments.
25-42
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2),
highly fossiliferous (bivalves), soft, very low permeability.
42-60
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), packed biomicrite, abundant
sand-sized and larger (centimeter-sized) fossil, diverse fauna, soft,
poorly friable, high porosity with common moldic pores after
aragonitic fossils. Common sand-sized black/dark gray fossil
fragments.
60-70
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite), hard,
high visible intergranular porosity, common moldic pores after
aragonitic fossils.
70-90
Sandstone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), quartz, fine to medium-
grained, very fossiliferous, calcite-cemented, hard, not friable,
moderate porosity. Common (1-2%) sand-sized black phosphate
grains. Common large fossils, including bivalves and gastropods.
90-100
Sandstone, two lithologies present:
A) Yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), quartz, fine-grained, calcite-cemented,
common fossil fragments, common (1-2%) sand-sized phosphate
grains.
B) Medium gray (N5) to dark medium gray (N4), quartz, fine-
grained, less fossiliferous than lighter colored sandstone.
100-110
Sandstone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to medium gray (N4), quartz,
mostly fine-grained, fossiliferous (common large bivalves), mostly
moderately hard, moderate porosity, common (5%) granule-sized
phosphate fragments.
C:\Documents and Seltings\mperry\local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-1 MCSO01IoQ_doc
14-19
Be
Table 14A~1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
110-144
Sand, pale olive (10 YR 6/2) to (10 YR 5/2), quartz, clay-rich
matrix, fine-grained, very fossiliferous (abundant large bivalves),
common (2-5%) granule-sized phosphate fragments. Bivalve
fragments are white (N9) to very pale orange (10 YR 8/2).
Limestone, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1) and pale yellowish-brown (10
YR 6/2) to light yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/4), sparse biomicrite to
biosparite, hard, very high visible porosity, both intergranular and
moldic. Fossils include casts and molds of bivalves, gastropods,
and (rare) corals.
144-174
174-198
Clay, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), common silt and fine sand-sized
quartz grains, soft, very low permeability. Minor sand-sized
phosphate grains and fossils (gastropods).
198-242
Clay, very light olive-gray (5 Y 7/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
common medium sand to granule-sized quartz grains, soft, very
low permeability. Minor coarse sand to granule-sized phosphate
grains.
242-262
Clay, pale olive (10 YR 6/2), soft, abundant very fine to very coarse
sand-sized quartz grains, common rounded sand-sized phosphate
grains, very low permeability. Minor sandstone (very fine-grained)
and siltstone.
262-270
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), abundant silt and very fine sand-sized
quartz grains, soft, very low permeability, common (5%) sand-
sized phosphate grains, minor fossils (gastropods). A lot of sand
production during drilling.
270-289
Clay, medium grayish-olive (10 Y 5/2) to medium greenish- gray (5
GY 5/1) and less commonly (10%) pale greenish- yellow (10 Y
8/2), abundant silt and very fine sand-sized quartz grains, soft.
Common (5%) sand-sized phosphate grains, fossils are rare. A lot
of sand production during drilling.
289-297
Limestone, very light gray (N8) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderate hardness, moderate to high
porosity. Limestone consists of large bivalve fragments in a
carbonate sand matrix. Common very fine sand-sized phosphate
grains.
C:\Documenls and Settings\mperry\Local SeltingslTelTllorary Inlernet Files\OLK3\TabJe 14A-1 MCSO01IoQ_doc
14-20
rac
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
LitholoQY
297-305
Limestone (90%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, very good moldic porosity, marl (10%), yellowish-
gray (5 Y 8/1), soft, phosphatic, moderate to low porosity.
305-314
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant shell fragments (40%), coral fragments
common (20%), fossiliferous, excellent apparent porosity.
Limestone becoming pale olive (10 YR 6/2) with calcarenitic
texture from 314'.
314-320
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenite (biosparite), fossiliferous, moderately hard, phosphatic,
high porosity (moldic), harder from 318' to 320'.
320-324
Limestone, light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard to
moderately soft, fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic).
324-335
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, phosphatic, good intergranular porosity,
Limestone (30%), light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic).
335~369
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, abundant molds and casts of aragonitic fossils,
high to very high porosity, (good H20 producer). Limestone is
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) from 340' to 369'.
369-392
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, abundant molds and
casts, high porosity.
392-397
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenitic texture, moderately hard, fossiliferous, high porosity,
including abundant moldic pores.
397-400
Limestone (70%), pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
as above. Marl (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm,
apparently very low porosity and permeability.
400-408
Limestone (75%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), biomicrite, slightly
(quartz) sandy, moderately hard, fossiliferous, abundant, (50%)
coral and shell fragments.
408-412
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), calcarenite (biosparite),
fossiliferous, moderately hard, high apparent porosity.
C:\Documents and Settings\mperry\Local SeUingslTemporary Intemet Files\OLKJ\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-21
Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
412-415
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), soft to firm, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability, abundant quartz sand, phosphatic,
abundant shell fragments (20%).
415-418.5
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity, large percentage (20%) 1-2mm phosphate at
418', abundant shell fragments (20%).
418.5-420
Dolomite, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), microsucrosic texture, hard, slightly
phosphatic. moderate to high porosity. low apparent permeability,
420-429
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2). soft to firm, sticky to cohesive, slightly
phosphatic. low apparent porosity and very low permeability. Clay
is greenish-gray (5 Y 4/1), from 402' and is interbedded with
Limestone. very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite. moderately
hard. phosphatic, abundant shell fragments. apparent high
porosity.
429-431
Clay (40%), pale olive, soft to stiff. phosphatic, very low
permeability and Limestone (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2),
biomicrite. moderately hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, abundant
shell, moderate to high apparent porosity.
431-438
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite. moderately
hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic). Fossils
include coral and echinoderm fragments.
438-440
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to dusky yellow (5 Y 6/4),
biomicrite, moderately hard, fossiliferous (abundant echinoderm
and coral fragments). high to very high porosity.
440-449
Limestone. yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard.
phosphatic. fossiliferous, coral fragments predominant. high
porosity (moldic).
449-451
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite as above.
Marl (30%). yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), phosphatic, soft to firm, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
451-454
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high porosity (moldic).
C:\Documents and Seltings\mperrylLocal Setlings\Terrporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-1 MCSO011og.doc
14-22
Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoav
454-459
Limestone (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to white (N9),
biomicrite, phosphatic, fossiliferous, moderately hard, high porosity
(moldic). Marl (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), soft,
phosphatic, low porosity and very low permeability.
459-468
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly cemented
biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard, phosphatic,
fossiliferous, high intergranular porosity, and Marl (20%) as above.
468-469
Limestone, while (N9), calcarenite (poorly cemented biosparite),
moderately hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity.
469-471
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, fossiliferous, high porosity.
471-474
Marl (50%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), soft, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability. Limestone (50%),
very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity.
474-478
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), phosphatic, moderately soft, fossiliferous,
high porosity. Marl (30%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1 ), soft, phosphatic, low apparent porosity
and very low permeability.
478-479
Marl, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
479-487
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, high porosity.
487-497
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity. Marl (50%),
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), soft to stiff phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
497-508
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to pale olive (10 Y 6/2), firm,
phosphatic, 1 mm particles of phosphate and shell, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability. Clay is grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2)
from 499' to 508', abundant (30%) phosphate grains, 1-2mm from
505 to 508'.
C:\Documents and Settings\rrperry\Local Settings\Temporary Internet FileslOlK3\Table 14A-l MC5001Iog.doc
14-23
i1"
Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholooy
508-515
Clay (60%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity. Limestone (20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
biosparite, phosphatic, moderate to hard, good apparent porosity.
Marl (10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft, low apparent porosity
and yery low permeability. Phosphate (10%).
515-516
Dolomite, grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), crystalline, hard, moderately
apparent porosity,
516-518.5
Clay, grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), firm, cohesive, phosphatic with low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
518.5-525
Dolomite (60%), grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), microsucrosic texture,
hard, phosphatic, moderate to high porosity (moldic), low apparent
permeability, occasional large 2-5 mm phosphate particles
common. Dolomite (40%), very light gray (N8), sucrosic, vuggy,
hard, phosphatic, high porosity.
525-545
Limestone (60%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft with moderate porosity. Marl
(10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability. Clay (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), olive-
gray (5 Y 4/1), firm, cohesive, phosphatic, low apparent porosity
and very low permeability.
545-549
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphate and shell
(10%), low apparent porosity and very low permeability.
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, fossiliferous (abundant coral and bryozoan fragments), high
porosity and Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability, (2%) occasional
phosphate granules.
549-552
552-560
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), to pale olive (10 Y 6/2), firm,
cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low permeability,
accessory constituents, phosphate granules 1-2mm (5%), coral
fragments (25%).
560-560,5
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
abundant molds and casts, abundant shell fragments (bivalves),
high porosity.
560.5-562
Clay, light gray (N8), soft to firm, low apparent porosity, very low
permeability.
C:\DoClJments and Sellings\rrperry\Locaf SeWngslTel1lJOrary Intemet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-1 MC5001log.doc
14-24
;, Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
562-570
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to light gray (N8),
biomicrite, very soft, fossiliferous, abundant (20%) shell fragments
(including bryozoans and bivalves), high apparent porosity. Clay
(50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, low apparent porosity,
very low permeability.
570-574
Clay (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphatic
(flecks of phosphate), low apparent porosity and very low
permeability. Limestone (30%), yellowish-gray, as above.
574-576
Clay, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability. Common (30%) shell
fragments (calcitic bivalves).
576-577
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity.
577-579.5
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/2), to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
biomicrite, moderately hard, phosphatic, (flecks of phosphate
throughout rock), occasional (1-2%) phosphate grains, high
porosity (moldic).
579.5-581
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 y 8/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), soft to
firm, cohesive, phosphatic, flecks of phosphate, abundant (20%)
phosphate granules, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability.
581-585
Dolomite (90%), greenish-gray/(5 GY 6/1) microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate to low porosity. Clay (10%),
greenish-gray (5 Y 6/1), soft to firm, low porosity.
585-589
Clay, greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability, common (15%) phosphate
granules.
589-589.5
Dolomite (90%), greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate to low porosity. Clay (10%),
greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, low porosity and very low
permeability.
589.5-592
Clay, greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability, phosphatic.
C:\Documenls and Seltings\mperryllocal Setlings\Temporary Internet FileslOLK3\Table 14A-1 MC5001Iog.doc
14-25
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Be
Depth (feet)
LitholoQV
592-597
Limestone (80%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), micrite, marly,
moderately soft to moderately hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, high
apparent porosity, phosphate granules (10%), 2-5 mm size.
Dolomite (10%), greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate porosity.
597-609
Limestone (100%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), phosphatic, biomicrite,
moderately soft, phosphatic, marly, high porosity.
609-611
Limestone, light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant shell fragments, high moldic porosity.
611-614
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, high moldic porosity, 1-2% phosphate granules.
614-620
Dolomite, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
crystalline texture, phosphatic, very hard, high porosity (moldic),
additional constituents: phosphate (1-2%).
620-629
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
abundant molds and casts, high porosity (moldic).
629-630
Dolomite (30%), pale greenish-yellow (10 Y 8/2), microsucrosic
texture, hard, moderate apparent porosity. Limestone (70%), as
above.
630-635
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, phosphatic,
moderately hard, high porosity (moldic).
635-646
Limestone (95%), light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1),
biomicrite, hard, phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high to
very high moldic porosity. Calcite cement in some molds.
Dolomite (-5%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), crystalline texture, hard, low
apparent porosity.
646-654
Marl 20%,light gray (N7), soft, low apparent porosity, and very low
permeability. Limestone (10%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard,
phosphatic, high porosity (intergranular). Limestone (65%), light
gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), moderately soft to
moderately hard, calcarenite (biosparite), phosphatic, high porosity
(intergranular). Dolomite (5%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), sucrosic, hard,
moderate apparent porosity.
C:\Oocumenls and Settings\mperry\local Setlings\Temporary Intemet FileslOlK3\Table 14A.1 MCSO01log.doc
14-26
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
~ Continued -
8e
Depth (feet)
LitholoQV
654-669
Limestone, light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), biomicrite,
moderately hard, abundant molds and casts, phosphatic, very high
porosity (moldic). Limestone is partially dolomitized (flecks of
brownish-gray (5 YR 4/1)).
669-670
Dolomite (10%), light olive-brown (5 Y 5/6), microsucrosic texture,
very hard, phosphatic, low apparent porosity. Dolomite (90%), very
pale orange (10 YR 8/2), microsucrosic texture, molds and casts,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, hard, high porosity (moldic).
670-680
Dolomite (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), sucrosic, hard, with
1 mm flecks of olive-brown dolomite, as above, phosphate, good
moldic porosity. Dolomite (30%), light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5
GY 6/1), hard, microsucrosic texture, phosphatic, abundant molds
and casts, high apparent porosity, softer zone from 677-680'.
680-694
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), biomicrite,
abundant molds and casts, moderately hard, high porosity
(moldic).
694-705
Limestone, very light gray (N8), biomicrite, moderately hard,
slightly phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high to very high
porosity.
705-707
Limestone, very light gray (N8), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, slightly phosphatic, high porosity (intergranular).
707-711
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to grayish-orange (10 YR 7/4),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderately hard, abundant molds and
casts, high porosity (moldic and intergranular).
711-712
Dolomite (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to pale greenish-yellow
(10 Y 8/2), microsucrosic texture, very hard, low apparent porosity.
Dolomite (50%), grayish-orange (10 YR 7/2), microsucrosic
texture, very hard, low apparent porosity.
712-719
Sand, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1) to very light gray (N8), very
fine grained, subangular to subrounded particles.
C:\Documents and Settingslmperry\Locat Setlings\Temporary lntemel FileslOlK3\Table 14A-1 MCS0011og.doc
14-27
8e
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
719-721
Dolomite (40%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to pale yellowish-
brown (10 YR 6/2), microsucrosic texture, moderately hard,
moderate to high apparent porosity (moldic and intercrystalline).
Dolomite (40%), yellow (10 Y 8/6), microsucrosic texture,
moderately hard to hard, moderate to low apparent porosity. Clay
(20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft, slightly cohesive, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
721-740
Limestone (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) calcarenite,
moderately hard, high porosity (moldic). Marl (30%), very light
gray (N8), soft low apparent porosity and very low permeability.
740-744
Clay (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y
8/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability. Marl (20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/2), soft, low
apparent porosity. Limestone (10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
biomicrite, soft, marly, high porosity.
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (very poorly
cemented biosparite), sandy, moderately soft, high porosity
(intergranular).
744-750
750-760
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to grayish-orange
(10 YR 7/4), calcarenite (very poorly cemented biosparite), sandy
texture, moderately soft and firm, high porosity (mostly
intergranular, minor moldic). Calcite infilling molds at 755'.
Abundant molds and casts from 755-760', marl (20%), light gray
(N8), soft, moderate to low apparent porosity.
760-773
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, high porosity
(intergranular), common (20%) shell (bivalve) fragments. Marl
(20%), light gray (N8), soft, low apparent porosity permeability.
773-774
Clay, light greenish-gray (5 G 8/1), soft to firm, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability.
774-780
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite,
(poorly cemented biosparite) moderately soft, fossiliferous,
abundant to occasional molds and casts, high porosity. Marl
(20%), light gray (N8), soft, low to moderate porosity.
780-791
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, marly, microfossils present,
moderate to high porosity (intergranular).
C:\Documenls and Settings\rnpeny\Local Settings\Terrporary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-28
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
~8C
Depth (feet)
LitholoQY
791-793
Limestone (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite,
moderately hard, occasional molds and casts, high apparent
porosity. Limestone (40%), light greenish-gray (5 G 8/1),
biomicrite, moderately hard, high porosity.
793-794
Limestone, grayish-orange (10 YR 7/4), biomicrite, moderately
hard, occasional molds and casts, high moldic porosity.
794-799
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, molds and casts common, high apparent porosity.
799-804
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, slightly more
sandy than above, moderately hard, good high porosity
(intergranular and moldic).
804-808
Clay (70%), marl, white (N9), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability. Limestone (30%) as above,
808-818
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (biosparite)
texture, moderately soft to moderately hard, high porosity
(intergranular and moldic).
818-819
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, very high apparent porosity,
819-819.5
Clay, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to pale yellowish-brown (10 YR
6/2), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability.
819.5-820
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite,
(biosparite), moderately soft, high apparent intergranular porosity.
820-835
Limestone (70%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite,
calcarenitic texture, moderately hard to moderately soft, high
porosity (intergranular). Limestone (30%), very pale orange (10 YR
8/2), biomicrite, marly, moderately soft, high intergranular porosity.
835-835.5
Clay (50%), grayish-brown, soft, low apparent porosity and very
low permeability, phosphate (50%).
835.5-838
Limestone (70%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite
(calcarenitic texture), moderately hard, high intergranular porosity.
Limestone (30%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, marly,
moderately soft, high apparent porosity.
C:\Documents and Sellings\mperry\Local SellingslTemporary Intemet FileslOlK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-29
~" Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
LitholoQV
838-847
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light gray (N7), calcarenite,
moderately soft, high porosity (intergranular).
847-848
Clay (50%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), soft, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability. Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (as above).
848-852
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to olive-gray (5 Y 4/1),
biomicrite, abundant foraminifera, moderately hard, high apparent
porosity.
852-860
Limestone, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1), to light olive-gray (5 Y
6/1), calcarenite (biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard,
very high intergranular porosity,
860-861
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), micrite, sandy, moderately soft
to moderately hard, high porosity (intergranular).
861-862
Clay (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), soft to firm, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability. Clay (40%), dark
yellowish-brown (10 YR 4/2), soft, low apparent porosity.
862-866
Limestone, olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), biomicrite, sandy, moderately hard,
high porosity.
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, sandy (quartz),
marly, moderately hard to moderately soft, high porosity.
866-874
874-875
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite, slightly
sandy (quartz), moderately soft to moderately hard, high apparent
porosity.
875-880
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, microfossils present, very high intergranular
porosity.
880-885
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light gray (N7), calcarenite
(biosparite/packed biomicrite), marly, moderately soft, high
apparent intergranular porosity.
885-890
Dolomite, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), microsucrosic texture, very
hard, moderate porosity. Clay (2%) at 890', Clay is dark greenish-
gray (5 GY 4/1), firm, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability.
C;\Documenls and Seltings\mperry\local SetlingslTempOfary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-1 MC5001Iog.doc
14-30
" Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
LitholoQV
890-893
Dolomite, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), microsucrosic texture,
very hard, moderate to low apparent porosity.
893-894
Clay, very light gray (N8), soft to firm, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability.
894-900
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly cemented
biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard, high porosity
(intergranular).
900-908
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, phosphatic, occasional
molds and casts, very high intergranular porosity. Molds and casts
are abundant from 906' to 908'.
908-910
Limestone, pale yellowiSh-brown (10 YR 6/2) to light gray (N7),
biomicrite, slightly sandy, moderately hard, abundant molds and
casts, phosphatic, high porosity (moldic)..
Limestone (95%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite
(poorly cemented biosparite), moderately soft, slightly phosphatic,
occasional molds and casts (10%), high porosity (intergranular).
Clay (5%), dark greenish-gray (5 GY 4/1), partially Iithified,
moderately soft, low apparent porosity and very low permeability.
910-917
917-917.5
Sand, pale yellowish brown (10 YR 6/2), quartz, very fine grained,
subangular to subrounded particles.
917.5-920
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, phosphatic, high porosity
(intergranular).
920-927
Sand (80%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), predominantly
quartz, very fine grained, subangular to subrounded particles,
unconsolidated, phosphatic. Limestone (20%), pale yellowish-
brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly cemented biosparite),
moderately soft, phosphatic, high intergranular porosity.
C;\Documents and SeUings\r1l:>erry\local Setlings\Temporary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A.1 MC5Q01tog.doc
14-31
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well Me-5075
" 8e
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
0-10
Sand, fine-grained, quartz, well-sorted, subangular, fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%).
10 - 12
Sandy clay, pale olive (10Y 6/2), sticky, fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%).
12 -14
No recovery; probably shell.
14 - 22
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, soft, sandy, high macroporosity
(intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
22 -28
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2), fossil wackestone, soft,
sandy, high macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%).
28 - 35
Limestone, yellowish gray (5Y 7/2) to pale olive (10Y 6/2) to
medium light gray (N6), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%), trace sandstone.
35 - 45
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, moderately soft to moderately hard,
sandy, high macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%).
Limestone, pale olive (10Y 6/2) to medium gray (N5) to medium
dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, mOldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-5%).
45 - 55
55-60
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity
(intergranular, mOldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-5%).
60 - 80
Shell (95%), Limestone (5%), pale olive (1 OY 6/2), fossil
wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular,
mOldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
80 -107
Shell (95%). Sandy clay (5%), pale olive (10Y 6/2), sticky, fine-
grained phosphate (1-2%), trace limestone.
107 -120
Limestone. medium gray (N5) to medium dark gray (N4), fossil
wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular,
moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-5%).
C:\Documents and Setlings~rry\Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files\OLK3\Tabte 14A-2 MC50751og.doc
14-32
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well MC-5075
- Continued -
8e
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
120-130
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to medium gray (N5) to
medium dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%).
130 -140
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to medium gray (N5),
fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity
(intergranular, mOldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
140 -160
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y 7/2)
to medium gray (N5) to medium dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone,
moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-
grained phosphate (1-2%).
160 - 170
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to granule-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy
clay and limestone.
170 -180
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace
sandy clay.
180-190
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to medium pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace
sandy clay.
190 - 200
Shell and sand, coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy
clay.
200 - 210
Sand, coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, few shells, trace sandy
clay.
210 - 220
Sand, very fine to fine-grained, quartz, poorly-sorted, subrounded.
220 - 230
Sand, very fine to very coarse-grained, quartz, poorly-sorted,
subrounded.
230 - 240
Sand (95%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Sandy clay
(5%), yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), sticky, fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%).
240 - 260
Sand, very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded.
C:\Documents and Settings\mperry\Local SellingslTemporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-2 MC50751og.doc
14-33
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well MC-5075
- Continued -
>>" 8 C
Depth (feet)
LitholoQY
Sand, very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy clay.
260 - 270
270 - 277
Sand (95%), very fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized"
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay
(5%), yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
277 - 280
Sand (70%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Sandstone
(30%), fine-grained, quartz, well-sorted, subrounded.
280 - 295
Clay (60%), pale yellowish green (10GY 7/2), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%). Sand (40%), very fine-grained sand to fine
pebble-sized gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-
rounded, trace sandstone.
295 - 300
Sand (60%), very fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded. Clay (40%),
light olive gray (5Y 6/1), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%), trace
sandstone.
300 -310
Sand (50%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded. Clay (50%), dusky
yellowish green (5GY 5/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
310 - 320
Sand (90%), fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (10%), yellowish
gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
320 - 340
Sand (98%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (1-2%),
yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
340 - 358
Sand (90%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (10%),
pale olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
358 - 360
Sand (90%), fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded. Clay (5%), pale
olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%). Sandstone (5%),
fine-grained sand, quartz, well-sorted, subrounded.
360 - 370
Clay (90%), pale olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
Sand (10%), very fine-grained sand to granule-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded, trace sandstone.
C:\Documents and Seltings\mperry\local Seltings\Terrporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-2 MC50751og,doc
14 - 34
1Q
. JS
01'
~Ol.UNG NO~l
rl{Oc,JiCT:
LOCATION:
DRI1..LED:
PROJEC'J'NO.: .
.1'AGE 1 QF 2
.nn__' __,
,,, ,,', ,', ,-~
14-35
!~
,,'~LIIO ,
'~,,-
T"",. 14>-' "!l:C ~
t.. ,,,,' PL_~), ) , I
F:. /':'. I
G l! , \1i)
ft v. II, II. Sl'TOiI'Q
\\t"D I (0)''''' Q,' " I
" .10 2C 4ll" J;ll ,00
,55 I J I,. I' 1'1
I II II .1.1
I I I I I
, snl'Slllt ;-1;2 ~I 1.1 , , I, 0'
,~O. r IN.)) ~ r\ I I, ',' . "
I t I'i\ r '
SPN 1:><, 1~1:M3 ~ I 'I I",'
-115 -' ' "", (ll"'::!O): I \ ' ".~ :
~ -, II: .
, ,': ~~, "'I' '
,.:l/.I.2}26. - .,' "
~N"dl)/ /' I I '. ,
, './ : 1,.1,
~- ""'", Ii,~~, J~: ' , '.
1N:,.'ll " '
.' I ,
, . - I., I
I' . 'C., , I I 'r
" ' '
'. I 'I .
. I
..:.. I II.
~I
: 11,1 .I'~
. " I I '
, I I I '.,
I ./ :
. ./[/ !' I ",
. .;/ , I, 1~S:I.:1 '
, ,[ 1 : I"
:::, I. . , "Iii. I'
;J.. . t ',L;
". ,'A',- -1, ~~\~ ' . IW,' :
, ' 'l : I
. I _ , I
.' , I,
-IDS -'I' L , ~
." , :' ':,
I .' , . ," ' '
~ ' I I,
, -110 Q In ~ 30 40 W 00 1() IO'~:l.\lIl
..
. 11, '
1!
P
_ 1',
" ,Ail:
1(0)
,5$-
r
tOrlll.,.,fiuidl6>>.a\5;l (..,
.[~,~:. "
I)-'Il:
, 1l.t,fi
, t"
- ~- l:1<in~ 1....
. :': ~g~~~' i:~
~ 7P ~ 'lllJl:jO'i:J:li'
I D . ,
. j.' J~4:-'" __~-
r,~.j:~~~~~~j' .
- , " .'"., .
"':'~ .,
" :'" ",MlT":\;>~:..':, , . "
I . '. "
I " , ,.
N'
'"
, , '
IltiJ.lI'ril!'U''''......
~: .
~,.i'.
_L ' " SP'r-17
---.-J- .70' ~
,'...
,
p:ay.
,
I' ~.
nO. ",ij .~
"
,,: , '.
.: "
10S'
,
I\JA tlNIVEI\SlTY
c, ~:FL
,
I
1
",."""illslAS11>ll\-'ISSfi
ASON
ONS
<\CEC
~'f<?~
WCf~"',_",TO '"
Of
:
D
l'
I
/-:1ay<l
~187.0
:.:1'1't:i
1
14-36
!!!
Qi
o~
Ol e::
'0' .Q
~ -
a.. 0
~~
'We
:Va..
.::: rn
e:: e::
=>~
.~ 'x
roW
:::q~
Olo
~~
Ol
~en
'a
~~
~rn
Ol :J
:00
ro ~
f-.2J
ro
~
Qi
>
Ol
E:;:
:J e::
.~ ~
x .-
ro E
::a.l!!
e::
o
()
<D
Qi
~
'"
Qi
~
..,.
Qi
~
C')
Qi
~
N
Qi
~
~
Qi
~
~
.2!
Ol
E
~
ro
a..
'"
~
<D
~
Qi> CI)- ~
:JVj'
~~ ~~
Q) Q) a. Q)
coQ)EO
> u. Ol ~
>~f-
'"
.n
N
'"
N
~
'"
N
'"
.n
N
co
<i
N
C\!
..,.
N
"-
,..:
co
"-
,..:
":
"-
'"
"-
"-
,..:
2'
I .~
0.
B
~
~-
:~ ~ Q)
- - "
o U) 'i::~
:J 0 0
-c.c::c.s
e:: E ()
o :J
()~
C')
'"
0)
::J:
<D
<D
0)
"-
co
N
"-
a
N
"-
"-
N
<D
a
~
~
N
C')
N
C')
'"
C')
..,.
C')
0)
N
a
'"
N
Ol~
~~
z-S
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
a
~
~
..,.
...J
o
0)
a
"-
"-
C')
co
~
...J
o
0)
a
'"
N
Ol~
~~
:J-S
en
a
..,.
C')
a
"-
N
a
"-
C')
a
0)
N
a
a
C')
a
..,.
N
II>
II>~
Ol-
e::-
,,0>
~ E
ro-
I
E
:J
'[j
rn Ol
() ::::::: -c
~ 0) 'i=
~ E "S
Ol-CI)
e::
"
~
ro
I
a
co
N
a
..,.
N
a
a
C')
a
co
N
a
'"
N
a
a
N
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
...J
o
0)
'"
0>
-S
II>
:2
(;
CI) E
"0::::::: ::J
Q) 0) '0
>Sm
(; ()
en
en
Ci
a
co
'"
a
co
C')
a
co
..,.
a
..,.
..,.
a
N
..,.
a
"-
C')
a
a
'"
a
~
~
co
~
"-
0)
..,.
C')
a
a
N
~
C\!
C')
a
~
~
<D
N
a
a
~
..,.
N
6
~
co
...J
o
0)
C')
6
~
'a,
E
""
e::-",
e "
-,S
~.
Be
r-
'"
I
<j'
.-i
-
Ol E
o~
~ e::
:J 0
0013
" Ol
e::m
.:']0
:;: :;:
00
ID"Q)
0)0)
en...J
...JO
0)0)
Table 14B - 2. Ave Marla University Project
Well 2 Sampling Results
8e
Well 2 Well 2 Well 2
Parameter 5/6/03 6/10/03 7/15/03
Water Level 16.15 5.9 4.59
(Feet BLS)
Temperature 24.8 25.4 25.1
(Celsius)
pH 7.5 7.9 8.4
(std. units)
Conductivity 720 737 714
(umhos/em)
Chloride 34 34 35
(mall)
Nitrate BDL 0.16 <0,05
(mall)
Sulfate 18 20.6 20
(mall)
Hardness 300 314 350
(mg/I)
Hardness, Calcium 250 -- 320
(mall)
Sulfide BDL 1.02 <1.0
(mall)
Dissolved Solids 420 440 430
(mall)
Calcium 100 98.4 100
(mall)
Iron 0.24 5.12 0.19
(mall)
Aluminum -- 0.07 --
(mal/)
Barium -- 0.03 --
(mal/)
Boron -- 0.063 --
(mal/)
Color -- 155.6 40
(CU)
Fluoride -- BDL 0.23
(mgll)
Potassium -- 5.62 --
(ma/I)
Magnesium -- 19.2 16
(mall)
Manganese -- 0.17 --
(mall)
Sodium -- 24.1 24
(mg/l)
Ammonia -- 0.73 0.59
(mall)
Nitrite -- 0.021 <0.05
(ma/I)
Silica, dissolved -- 13.3 14
(mg/I as SiO,)
Strontium -- 0.14 --
(mg/l)
Alkalinity, Total -- 296 290
(mg/l as CaCO,)
Total Organic 13 15
Carbon --
(mg//)
14--~
"8e
QUESTION 15 - SOILS
A.1. Provide a description of each of the soils indicated on Map E utilizing the following
format:
Table 15.A-1 provides a list of soil map units present on Town of Ave Maria site. Please
refer to Map E for the location of soil map units delineated by the NRCS (formerly known as
SCS). Based upon the presence or absence of each soil map unit on the local NRCS
hydric soil list, approximately 79 percent ofthe Town of Ave Maria site contains non-hydric
soils.
Table 15.A-1
Soil Description and Interpretations
Soil Name Depth to Seasonal High Degree & Degree & Kind
and Map Brief Soil Description Rock Water Table Penneability Kind of of Limitation
Depth Duration Rate Limitation for for pond
Symbol (inches) (feet) monthl (in/houri low buildings embankments
Holopaw fine Nearly level, poorly
sand, drained soil in sloughs June. Severe Severe
limestone and broad drainages. 50-80 0-1.0 0.2-2.0 (cutbanks cave,
substratum Slopes are smooth and Nov. (wetness) wetness)
(#2) range from 0 to 2%.
Malabar fine Nearly level, poorly
drained soil in sloughs Severe
sand and broad drainages. >60 0-1.0 June. <0.06-0.2 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Nov. (wetness)
(#3) Slopes are smooth and wetness)
range from 0 to 2%,
Immokalee Nearly level, poorly Severe
fine sand drained soil on flatwoods. >60 0-1.0 June- 0.6-2.0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Slopes range from 0 to Nov, (wetness)
(#7) 2%. wetness)
Oldsmar fine Nearly level, poorly
sand, drained soil on broad, Severe
limestone nearly level sloughs. 60-72 0-1.0 June- 0.06-2.0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
substratum Slopes are smooth to Oct (wetness) wetness)
concave and range from 0
(#10) to 2%
Oldsmar fine Nearly level, poorly Severe
sand drained soil on flatwoods. >60 0-1,0 June. <0.06-0.2 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Slopes are smooth and Feb. (wetness) wetness)
(#16) range from 0 to 2%.
Basinger fine Nearly level, poorly
drained soil in sloughs June- Severe Severe
sand and broad drainages. >60 0-1.0 6.0-20 (cutbanks cave,
Feb, (wetness)
(#17) Slopes range from 0 to wetness)
2%.
Boca fine Nearly level, poorly Severe
sand drained soil on flatwoods. 24-40 0-1.0 June- 0.6-2,0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Slopes range from 0 to Oct (wetness)
(#21) 2%. wetness)
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,,~
03786-013.()oo.PDRI.2B423
15-1
"~ 8. 'C
i"
Soil Name Depth to Seasonal High Degree & Degree & Kind
Water Table Penneability Kind of of Limitation
and Map Brief Soil Description Rock Depth Duration Rate Limitation for for pond
Symbol (inches) (feet) month) (in/hour) low buildings embankments
Chobee, Severe Severe
Winder, and Level, very poorly drained (wetness) (cutbanks cave,
Gator soils, soil in depressions and >60 +2-1.0 June- <0.0&.0.2 ponding)
marshes. Slopes are 0- Dec. Gator soil:
depressional 1%. ponding, Gator: excess
(#22) subsidence humus
Holopaw and Severe Severe
Okeelanta Level, very poony drained (ponding) (cutbanks cave,
soils, soil in depressions and >60 +2-1.0 June- 0.2-2.0 ponding)
marshes. Siopes are 0- April Okeelanta
depressional 1%. soil: ponding, Okeelanta:
(#23) subsidence excess humus
Boca, Boca:
Riviera, 2440 June- Boca: 0.&.2.0
limestone Level, very poony drained Boca: Feb. Severe
substratum, soil in depressions, Riviera: +2-0 Riviera: 0.2- Severe (cutbanks cave,
and cypress swamps, and 40-70 6.0 ponding)
Copeland marshes. Slopes are 0- Others: July-April (ponding)
Copeland: Copeland:
fine sands, 1%. 20-50 +2-1.0 for 0.2-0.6
depressional Copeland
(#25)
Holopaw fine Neany level, peony drained Severe
sand soil in sloughs and broad >60 0-1.0 June- 0.2-2.0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
drainages. Slopes range Nov. (wetness) wetness)
(#27) from Ot02%
Winder, Winder: June- Winder:
Riviera,
limestone Level, very poony drained >60 Dec. <0.06-0.2 Severe
substratum, soil in depressions and Riviera: +2-1.0 Chobee: Severe (cutbanks cave,
and Chobee marshes. Slopes are 0- 40-70 June- <0.06-0.2 (ponding) ponding)
soils, 1%. Chobee: Feb. for Riviera: 0.2-
depressional >60 Riviera 6.0
(#43)
Source: Soil Survev of Collier counV9 Florida, Natural resources Conservation Service, U,S.
Department of Agriculture ( 98).
A.2. Describe the potential for subsidence and any unique geologic features (such as
sand dunes, bluffs, sinkholes, springs, steepheads, etc.) on the site. Discuss what
aspects of the site plan will be used to compensate for or take advantage of these
features.
No unique geological features are present on the Town of Ave Maria site. No known areas
susceptible to subsidence are located on the site. "Subsidence" limitations noted for low
buildings in Table 15.A-1 are associated exclusively with muck soils present on the site.
The muck material has a maximum thickness of 6-12 inches, and is easily removed and
backfilled where necessary.
7/2312004-135526 Ver.011-MPERRY
,-
03786-013-000-PORI.28423
15-2
8e
B. Where a soil presents a limitation to the type of use proposed in the development,
state how the limitation will be overcome. Specify construction methods that would
be used for building, road and parking lot foundations, and for lake or canal bank
stabilization as relevant.
According to the Soil Survey of Collier County, prepared by the USDA Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS), the Town of Ave Maria contains soils that are common to
Collier County. It should be noted that despite limitations associated with wetness,
approximately 80% of the site contains soils listed as non-hydric on the NRCS local
hydric soil list. As in other county developments, soil limitations or hazards (e,g.,
wetness, ponding, subsidence in organic soil materials) will be considered and generally
overcome by use of compacted fill. As noted in the response question to 15.A.2, any
areas of shallow muck (6-12 inches thick) will be removed and backfilled with suitable
compacted fill materials. Water management lakes will have banks designed and graded
to prevent erosion and to facilitate revegetation in locations where steep banks are
necessary, bulkheads or retaining walls will be used. Existing soil drainage
characteristics will be considered in design of water management systems.
c. What steps will be taken during site preparation and construction to prevent or
control wind and water soil erosion? Include a description of proposed plans for
clearing and grading as related to erosion control.
Erosion control plans are being submitted with the ERP permits, employing best
management practices. Areas under construction on the Town of Ave Maria will be
surrounded by silt fences, and existing canals will possess turbidity barriers.
Construction areas will frequently watered to control wind erosion and fugitive dust.
After earth-moving activities are completed, bare soil will be immediately sodded,
hydroseeded, etc. to provide vegetative cover that will minimize erosion from wind and
water.
D. To what degree and in what location(s) will the development site be altered by fill
material? If known, specify the source location and composition of the fill. Also
identify the disposal location for any overburden or spoil.
Geotechnical soil borings indicate a 40-50 foot thickness of suitable fill materials (fine sand
and limestone) on site, and lakes may be excavated to a maximum depth of 35 feet.
Therefore, most or all of the fill material will be obtained from the on-site lake excavations,
If any excess overburden or spoil exists at the end of construction, it will be used for top
dressing of filled areas and/or berm enhancements.
7/2312004- 135526 Ve~ 011- MPERRY
~,
Q3786_013-{10G-PDRI_28423
15-3
8e
QUESTION 16 - FLOODPLAINS
A. Identify any pre- and post-development flood prone areas.
The project site is included in Florida Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel No. 120067
0275 D. The project site is currently located in an area that FEMA has designated as
Zone D (an area in which flood hazards have not been determined).
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has staff gauges located within
Camp Keais Strand (the receiving water for the project) which record the surface water
stage elevation within the strand on a daily basis. The surface water management
system for the developed site will be designed based upon the anticipated receiving
water elevations, the amount of surface water storage provided in the proposed lakes at
the site, and the peak allowable discharge rate for the developed site. Per the
requirements of Collier County and SFWMD, the minimum road elevations within the site
will be established at or above the peak stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day Storm in the
developed site and the minimum finished floor elevations within the site will be
established at or above the peak stage of the 1 00 Year - 3 Day Storm with Zero
Discharge from the development to the offsite receiving waters. The surface water
management design and the minimum required elevations for the roads and finished
floors will be reviewed and approved by both Collier County and SFWMD.
B. Is any development proposed within a 10o-year flood prone area as identified by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency? If so, indicate the appropriate Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) zone designations and their locations, etc.
The proposed development is not located within a FEMA flood prone area. The project
site is included in Florida Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel No. 1200670275 D and is
located in an area that FEMA currently has designated as Zone D (an area in which
flood hazards have not been determined). FEMA is proposing that the Eastern Lands of
Collier County be designated as "Un-numbered A Zones," meaning that the site would
be considered to be within an area inundated by the 100 Year Flood, but without a
determined flood elevation. The County is currently conducting a study in other areas of
Collier County to address FEMA mapping. Collier County has been asked to include this
project in the ongoing study in order to request a map revision which would designate a
100 Year flood zone elevation at the Ave Maria project site.
C. If any structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within the post-development
1 OO-year flood prone area, identify their location and indicate what measures will be
taken to mitigate the potential flood hazard and to maintain the 100-year floodplain
storage volume.
The proposed development will occur in agricultural areas that are outside of the 100 Year
- 3 Day flood plain and will not result in the remove of storage volume from the 100 year
floodplain.
2004- 135531 Vllr: 011. MPERRY
"'86-013-QOO.--O
16-1
8e
.. ,,~
D. Discuss any potential increases in the off-site flooding due to the development of
this project.
No potential increases in off-site flooding are anticipated from the development of this
project.
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
What is the developer's source and methodology used to derive flood prone area
information? Has the developer sought the best available information from counties, cities,
water management districts, etc. (in addition to, or in lieu of, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency data), relative to flood prone areas.
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has staff gauges located within Camp
Keais Strand (the receiving water for the project) which record the surface-water stage elevation
within the strand on a daily basis. The stage information provided from the gauges within the
Camp Keais Strand indicates that the portions of the project proposed for development are
outside of the 100 year floodplain. The data available from the gauges was verified in the field
using hydro-biological indicators and staining information adjacent to each of the gauges.
.2Q04.- 135531 v..,: 01!- MPERRY
_..>l!l6-01J..OOQ-"0
16-2
l' 8e
QUESTION 17 - WATER SUPPLY
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 110 gallons per capita per day
Existing Level of Service: Not Applicable
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 110 gallons per capita per day
A.1. Provide a projection of the average daily potable and non-potable water demands at
the end of each phase of development. If significant seasonal demand variations
will occur, discuss anticipated peaks and duration. Use the format below:
Table 17.A-1
Potable/Non-Potable Water Demand
Potable Water Non-Potable Water Demand (MGD)
Demand (MGD) Irrigation
Existing 0 11.07
Phase 1 3.5 8.2
Buildout (Phase 2) 6.4 5.8'
, Demand will be met using reclaimed wastewater generated within the DR!.
Phase
A.2. Describe how this demand information was generated, including the identification of
the consumption rates assumed in the analysis.
The average daily potable water demand for each phase of the DRI is presented below
in Table 17.A-2. In predicting these demands. it was assumed that the potable water
demand would be 110% of wastewater generated. Wastewater generation and the
corresponding water demand was estimated in accordance with the standards
established in FAC Chapter 64E.008.
Non-potable demands are based upon the estimated landscaped areas of each land use
proposed at the Ave Maria site. A summary of the estimated irrigated acreage for
various land uses at the Ave Maria DRI is listed in Table17.A-3. It is anticipated that 1
to 2 inches of irrigation water will be required per week. Irrigation water for Ave Maria
will be provided from reclaimed water generated by the advanced secondary wastewater
treatment plant, as it is available. Additional irrigation water sources will be surface
water in stormwater management ponds and/or ground water wells drilled into the Lower
Tamiami aquifer. Initial irrigation demands will be satisfied using groundwater (permitted
through SFWMD) while the growth of the town increases to the point of generating
enough reclaimed water to meet the town's irrigation demands.
Irrigation system will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of irrigation water
during times when it is not needed. The quantity of water required for irrigation at the
end of Phase 2 will be approximately half of what is currently being used by existing
agriculture.
312004- 135531 Voc 01!- MPERRY
>.13786-013-000--0
17-1
8e
Source/Housing Type
Table 17.A-2
Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands
Units Projected Units Flow
2011 2016 (gpd/unit)
6,010 11,000 550
367,900 690,000 0.20
276,600 510,000 0.20
110 400 146
15,000 35,000 0.20
115,500 148,500 0.20
Unit
Fr
Fr
Room
Fr
Fr
Average Flow (gpd)
2011 2016
3,305,500 6,050,000
72,844 136,620
54,767 100,980
16,093 58,520
2,970 6,930
22,869 29,403
3,475,043 6,382,453
Residential
Retail
Office
Hotel
Medical
Civic (Miscellaneous)
Total
Table 17.A-3
Estimated Irrigated Acreage
Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 2 % Irrigated Acres Phase 2
Ave Maria DRI land Use Acres Acres IRRIGATED Irrigated Acres
University 467 849 30 140 255
Residential 1,371 2,492 40 548 997
Mixed 180 328 30 54 98
Community 116 211 30 35 63
Wetland Preserve 34 62
Park 34 61 75 26 46
Lakes 413 750
Roads 133 242 20 23 48
Totals: 2,748 4,995 34 826 1,507
Average Day Use (MGD) 3.2 5.8
The irrigation demands were calculated using the modified Blaney-Criddle method for
determining crop irrigation needs. The calculations incorporated a 1-in-10 annual
supplemental crop requirement for grass, a 0.4 soil type, and an irrigation efficiency of
77%.
B. Provide a breakdown of sources of water supply, both potable and non-potable, by
development phase through project completion. Use the format below.
Nonpotable Water Source
The nonpotable water needs at the Ave Maria site will be met by reclaimed water as
available, and groundwater sources of supply. Groundwater from the Lower Tamiami
aquifer will be pumped from wells into non-potable pipeline systems which will discharge
into several irrigation lakes for irrigation distribution. The groundwater supply wells for
irrigation are planned for in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 29 East.
"J/B2~~;3_1oVer'Ol!-MPERRY 17-2
rec
C. If water wells exist on-site, locate them on Map H and specify those that will continue
to be used. Also locate on Map H all proposed on-site wells. (For residential
developments, if individual wells for each lot are proposed, simply indicate the
number of units to be served, general locations, and any plans for eventual phase-
out.) Indicate the diameter, depth, and pumping rates (average and maximum) for
each of the existing wells and project this information for the proposed wells (for
lots served by individual wells, this information may be grouped for projection
purposes). Also provide a breakdown of the wells with regard to potable and non-
potable sources.
Existing on-site wells are shown in Figure 17.C-1 and known well data are given in
Table 17.C-1. Existing wells are currently used for agricultural irrigation. The
agricultural wells located on the project site will be properly plugged and abandoned by a
licensed drilling contractor.
The proposed wellfield will consist of wells withdrawing from the Lower Tamiami aquifer,
with wells located in Sections 5 and 8, Township 48 South, Range 29 East. For initial
water use permitting purposes, six Lower Tamiami aquifer production wells are
proposed. The production wells will be 10 to 12-inch in diameter, cased to
approximately 70 feet, with a total depth of approximately 120 feet. The pumping rate is
expected to range from 500 to 700 gpm.
D. If on-site water wells are used, will this result in interference with other water wells or
result in adverse impacts to underlying or overlying aquifers? Document the
assumptions underlying this response.
New on-site wells will be drilled to supply potable water demands and to supplement
reclaimed water supplies. The proposed Ave Maria DRI is located on land that is
currently permitted for agricultural irrigation water use. The existing agricultural
operations are permitted to withdraw from the water table and Lower Tamiami aquifers.
The proposed maximum day withdrawals for potable supply and irrigation use will be
significantly less than the agricultural maximum day withdrawals currently permitted at
the site. The proposed project will utilize the Lower Tamiami aquifer for potable uses
and will utilize reclaimed water and the Lower Tamiami aquifer for irrigation uses.
There are no documented adverse impacts occurring as a result of the existing
agricultural withdrawals. The final combined PWS (6.4 MGD) and irrigation demands
(5.8 MGD), less reclaimed water supply (5.8 MGD) is anticipated to be 6.4 MGD, or
approximately 42% less than the currently permitted allocation (See Table 17.A-1). The
impacts associated with groundwater pumpage should therefore be reduced by a similar
amount. The SFWMD Lower West Coast Plan (April 2000), which is the District's
assessment of water demands and sources, indicated no adverse impacts associated
with current and future projected agricultural use. The proposed reduction in maximum
day use will reduce the potential for adverse impacts to occur as a result of groundwater
withdrawals at Ave Maria.
.J2(104.-135531 VorcOl!-MPERRY
~J78lUl13-000-. 0
17-3
,: Be
E. Who will operate and maintain the internal water supply system after completion of
the development?
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP, a private utility company, will operate and maintain the
internal water supply system after completion of the development. A copy of a letter
from the utility company committing service availability is attached (Attachment 17.E-1).
F .1. If an off-site water supply is planned, attach a letter from the agency or firm
providing service outlining:
No off-site water supply is required for this DR!.
(a) the projected excess capacities of the water supply facilities to which
connection will be made at present and for each phase through completion of
the project,
Not applicable.
(b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity,
Not applicable.
(c) a statement of the agency or firm's ability to provide services at all times
during and after development. (This agency must be supplied with the water
demand and supply tables in paragraphs A and B above).
Not applicable.
F.2. If service cannot be provided at all times during and after development, identify the
required capital improvements, timing, cost, and proposed responsible entity for
each phase in which service is unavailable.
Service will be provided at all times during and after development by Ave Maria Utility
Company, LLLP.
G. Please describe any water conservation methods or devices incorporated into the
plan of development. What percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional
plans?
Water saving plumbing devices will be used as required by the current building code.
Irrigation system will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of irrigation water
during times when it is not needed. The quantity of water required for irrigation will be
less than what is currently being used by existing agriculture.
H. Indicate whether proposed water service will be provided within an established
service area boundary.
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP will provide service within the Town of Ave Maria DRI
boundary.
../2004-135531 Vef:01'.MPERRY
,13786-013-000--0
17-4
8e
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
1. With regard to existing public utilities, the applicant should provide a projection of
average daily potable demands, by phases. The source (utility) should be specified
and a commitment should be provided which specifies: the current pumpage, the
current commitments and the excess capacity (in MGD).
Newly created Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP, established specifically for this DRI, will
provide water, wastewater and reclaimed water to the Town. There are no current
pumpage or current commitments other than those commitments required by the Town.
Service capacities are being planned in accordance with FDEP regulations and will exceed
the phased demands required by the Town.
2. If wells are to be used (existing or new), on-site or off-site (but not as part of an
existing utility) the list of additional data frequently contains requests such as:
a. Aquifer performance characteristics, if the proposed source is groundwater
The aquifer performance characteristics are outlined in Question 14, Water.
b. Water availability analysis if the proposed source is surface water
The proposed source is not surface water.
c. Wellfield location and well design information (diameter, depth, pumping
rates)
This information is not currently available.
d. Impacts on other existing users
Existing irrigated agriculture fields will be removed in the process of developing The
Town of Ave Maria. The SFWMD Lower West Coast Plan (April 2000), which is the
District's assessment of water demands and sources, indicated no adverse impacts
associated with current and future projected agricultural use. The proposed
reduction in permitted allocation will reduce the potential for adverse impacts to
occur.
e. Impacts on environmentally sensitive lands (wetlands)
The proposed withdrawal facilities will be located to minimize potential impacts.
Facilities will be located, designed and operated in such a way that they will not
degrade the ambient surface or groundwater quality, and will not adversely
impact any adjacent FSA, HSA, WRA, or conservation areas.
3/2004-135531 Ver:011.'-FERRY
"J7B6-013-000--Cl
17-5
8e
,.bt<~~
3. Provide a plan for obtaining non-potable irrigation water supply from recycled
effluent; or if effluent will not be available, provide a non-potable water use plan
showing conservation measures that will be taken to reduce the demand.
Ave Maria is designed to utilize recycled effluent (reclaimed water) as a primary irrigation
water supply. Shortages of reclaimed water will be supplemented by water stored in
stormwater management ponds and/or ground water wells drilled into the Lower
Tamiami aquifer. Initial irrigation demands will be satisfied using groundwater (permitted
through SFWMD) while the growth of the town increases to the point of generating
enough wastewater to meet the town's irrigation demands.
4. Describe the methods used in developing per-capita and all other potable and non-
potable water demands and projections for demands.
Both potable water and wastewater flows were estimated per FAC Chapter 64E.008 with
potable water demand projected to be 110% of wastewater generation.
5. Relative to the total water demands for the proposed development, what impacts will
these demands have upon the regional water resources because of on-site water
development?
Overall water demands will be less because the agricultural current land use has greater
water needs when compared on an area (per acre) basis.
6. If total water demands are to be supplied by off-site sources, through a regional
water supply, private water utility, or public utility system, what are the projected
capabilities of that source to supply the required water demands at build out?
This question is not applicable because water demands will not be supplied by off-site
sources.
7. If a structural water facility modification would be required by an off-site water
supplier to meet these demands, what alternatives are now being sought and what
are the anticipated regional impacts as a result of the additional demands on the
resource?
This question is not applicable because water demands will not be supplied by off-site
sources.
8. What plans are proposed for effecting water conservation in all aspects of the
proposed development? This should include the use of lowest quality of water for
irrigation and/or industrial needs, water conserving plumbing fixtures, etc. What
percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional daily water use estimates if
conservation plans are implemented?
Low volume plumbing fixtures will be used to current building code standards and
reclaimed wastewater (effluent) will be used to supplement irrigation demands.
Jl2004-135531 Ver01!-MPERRY
J7BfKlU-OOO--O
17-6
r,.
ae
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~Ul 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: f!:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
$::J
WI
Ulh:~ .". CD ..... N .". (0 LO CD (') (0 N ~ (') LO (') .". .". (') N N '" 0 CD 0 (0 ..... ~ 0 0
<( i ~ .". .". .". .". .". .". LO .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". LO <D .". LO .". .". .". .". .". LO LO
OW
0
~I
~f-~ N (') LO '" (0 (0 <D LO ~ (') .". <D N (0 ..... '" <D ..... .". N ~ (') CD 0 (') (0 ~ 0 0
wn.<:::
$~~ ..... ..... ..... LO CD ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CD CD ..... CD <D CD CD <D ..... ..... ..... ..... CD (0 ..... <D ..... (0 (0
>-
n.G'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::<<(~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (') (')
::In. ~ (0 ~ LO '" <D ~ '" CD '" '" ~ ~ '" '" (0 ~ (0 (0 (0 (0 .". (0 ~ (0 CO '" ~ ~
n.<(
0
0::
W
f-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE C! C! 0 0 0 C! 0 0 0 C! 0 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! 0 0 C! 0 0 0 0 0 C! C!
::<" 0 (0 0 u) ai <D 0 ai cO '" ai 0 ..; ai ai (0 0 (0 (0 cO oj (0 oj 0 oj oj ai (') (')
:'!:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
n.w z 0:: 0:: ~ 0:: ~ ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ 0:: ~ 0:: co ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~ 0:: 0::
::<n. W ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J
1r~ 0 f- f- Z f- Z Z f- Z Z Z Z f- Z Z Z f- Z f- Z f- Ul Z f- Z Z Z f- f-
W
Cl 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! C! C! C! C! 0 C! 0 0
z '" '" '" '" ai ai ai '" ai ai ai '" '" '" ai ai ai '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ai '" ai ai
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Pi
,
'" zn. 0 C! C! C! 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 C! C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! C! C! C! C! C! 0 0
lii $- oj (0 (0 (0 oj oj (0 (0 (0 oj oj (0 (0 (0 (0 oj oj oj (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 oj oj
OI .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .".
f-Ul
'"
:>
zo::
OW
'" -co <D CD CD <D CD <D CD CD ..... ..... .....
'" f-::< ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... (0 (0 (0 (0 CO '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ &b
2 UlZ
~ ~w 0 N (') LO CD ..... (0 ~ <( (')
'" ~::< ~ N (') .". LO ~ N (') .". LO (') "f LO CD ..... (0 '" '" ~ ~ ~
~ , cO cO cO , , . , ,
w<( , , , , . , 00 , , , 0, , , , , 0, CD CD CD <D , , ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... (0 (0 (0 CO '" '" '" '" '" , CD .....
'" $Z '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
9 Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::0:: 0::
- ZUl ~ Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ ~ Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ Cl
'"
;:1 <(::J <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <(
~
. f-O:: $ $ ~ $ $ $ $ ~ $ $ $ $ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ $ $ ~ $ $ ~
cO cO , , cO cO , , cO cO , , , , , . ,
-w CD CD CD CD CD <D CD CD CD <D <D <D CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD <D <D
::<co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0::::< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
'" 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
n.z ' , , . , , . , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , ,
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Cl
~
~
-0
p.,
::::
::s:
~
-
U
r--
-
;0
E-<
l"-
I
I"-
rl
rsc
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~Ul 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
$::J -
WI
Ulh:i2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<(W:!:: LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO
00
~I
~f-= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wa..<l::
$~'=- (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 CO (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0
>-
a..5'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::;~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::Ja.. (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (')
0..<( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
0::
W
f-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~
::;<.> ..; ..; ..; (') (') ..; ..; (') (') ..; ..; (') (') ..; ..; (') (') ..; ..; ..; ..; (') (') (') (') (') ..; ..; (')
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
a..W 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
::;0..
~~ ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J
f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f-
W
(9 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0
z oj '" '" oj oj oj '" '" oj oj '" '" oj oj oj '" '" oj oj '" '" '" '" '" '" oj oj oj oj
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
,
Za.. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
$- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
OI (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0
f-Ul .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .".
Zo::
OW
-m ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CD ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CD ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
f-::; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
&b
UlZ
~W .". LO <D ..... (0 '" 0 ~ N (') .". LO CD ..... (0 '" 0 ~ N (') .". LO CD ..... (0 Ol 0 ~ N
~::; , , , . , ,.:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N (') (') (')
W<( ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... . , , ,.:. , . , ,.:. , , , , ,.:. , , , , , , . ,.:. , ,
$Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
ZUl ~ (9 Cl (9 ~ Cl Cl (9 Cl ~ Cl (9 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ ~ Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl ~ Cl
~::J <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <(
f-O:: ~ $ ~ ~ ~ $ $ $ $ ~ $ $ $ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ $ $ $ $ $ $ ~ ;s:
, , , cD cD , cD cD cD , , , cD cD cD cD ,
-W <D CD <D CD CD CD CD CD <D CD CD <D CD <D CD CD CD <D CD CD
::;m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0::::; N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0
a..Z , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..0
Q.l
;::l
<::
.~
;::
o
U
-
.
U
r-
-
Q.l
:g
E-<
(0
I
r-
.--i
'.'.
8e
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~Ul 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
$::J
WI
Ulh:~ 0 0 N (') N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <D 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0
<( i ~ LO LO .". .". .". LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO 0 0 0 .". LO LO 0 .". CD CD <D CD <D CD
OW ~ ~ ~ ~
0
~I
~t-~ 0 0 ..... ~ '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0
wa...::: 0 0 0 LO
$~~ (0 (0 <D ..... CD (0 (0 (0 (0 <Xl (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 N N N CD (0 (0 N CD (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0
>-
0..t5'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::E~] 0 0 0 0 0 (0 (0 <Xl (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::Jo.. (') (') '" <Xl (0 (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') 0 0 0 (0 (') (') N '" (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0
0..<( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
0::
W
t-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE 0 C! C! C! 0 C! C! C! 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! C! C! C! 0 C! C!
::Eo ,.; (') '" (0 a:i (') (') (') ,.; (') (') ,.; ,.; (') (') 0 N N a:i (') (') (') '" N N N N N N
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
o..w 0:: 0:: :'f z Z 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: :'f 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
::Eo.. ::J ::J W W ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J
ii~ t- t- Z 0 0 t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- t- Z t- t- t- t- t- t- t-
W
C) C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! 0 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! 0 0 0
z '" '" oi oi '" '" oi oi '" '" oi oi '" '" oi oi '" oi oi oi oi oi '" '" '" '" oi oi oi
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
,
Zo.. C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 C! 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! C! C! 0 0 0
$- (0 a:i a:i (0 (0 a:i a:i (0 (0 a:i a:i (0 (0 (0 a:i a:i (0 a:i a:i a:i a:i (0 (0 ..... ..... ..... ,...: ,...: ,...:
OI .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .".
t-Ul
zo::
OW
-m ..... ..... (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 <D CD <D ..... (0 (0 ~ ~ N N N N
t-::E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" (') (') (') (') (') (')
lrl::J
UlZ
~W (') .". <( <( <( N (') 'T CD ..... (0 '" 0 ~ N ~ .". 0 N ~ LO
~::E (') (') ~ N (') , , , , , , ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ , , , N N (') .". LO CD .....
W<( , , , , , (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 cb , , <D <D , , ..... (0 (0 , <D <D CD <D CD CD
..... ..... (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 <D '" '"
$Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
ZUl C) C) C) ~ C) C) ~ C) C) C) ~ C) C) C) C) ~ C) C) C) ~ C) C) C) C) C) C) C) ~ C)
~::J <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <(
t-O:: ~ s: $ ~ s: s: ~ ~ ~ s: ~ ~ ~ s: ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s: ~ ~ ~
, , , , , , , ,
-W CD <D CD CD CD <D CD <D CD CD CD CD CD <D CD <D <D CD <D CD CD CD CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::Em ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD <D CD <D <D CD
O::::E N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 9 9 0 9 9 0 0 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 0
o..z , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-d
"
g
.~
<:i
o
u
~
,
U
r--
~
"
{i
E-<
'"
I
.....
M
rae
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~Ul 0:: 0:: f!:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: f!:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
$::J
WI
Ulh:g 0 0 (') N ~ .". '" ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD .". 0 0 0
<(w <D CD CD <D CD LO LO CD CD (') <D
00
~I
~I--o:: 0 0 ..... LO (') N 0 LO (0 (0 (0
Wo.o:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
$~~ (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 ..... (0 ..... (0 (') .....
>-
o.G'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::E~~ 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::Jo. (0 (0 CD (0 (0 (0 '" CD (0 (0 ~ (0 ~ ~ (0 (0 ~ (0 '" '" (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 ~ (') (0
0.<(
0
0::
W
I-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE C! 0 0 C! C! 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 C! 0 C! 0 0 0
::EO N N cO (0 (0 cO '" cO cO (0 0 cO 0 0 cO (0 0 00 ai '" (0 (0 00 (0 00 (0 0 M 00
::1:- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
o.w 0:: 0:: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z
::Eo. ::J ::J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
1[~ l- I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
CJ 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 C! 0 C! 0 C! C! 0 C! C! C! 0 C! C! C! C! 0 C! C! 0 C!
z ai '" ai ai '" ai ai '" ai '" ai '" ai '" '" ai '" '" '" ai '" '" '" '" ai '" '" ai '"
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Zo. 0 C! 0 0 C! C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! 0 C! C! 0 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 C! C! 0 0
$- ,..: ..... 00 <Xi (0 (0 (0 (0 00 00 <Xi (0 <Xi (0 (0 00 00 00 00 00 (0 (0 (0 ,..: ,..: ..... ..... ,..: ,..:
OI .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .".
I-Ul
zo::
OW
-m N ~ ~ ~ N (') (') (')
I-::E (') (') CD <D LO LO LO LO .". CD LO LO LO LO LO LO .". .". .". .". LO .". <D (') (') (') (') (') (')
fib
UlZ
~w
~::E (0 ~ CD (0 CD ..... (0 ~ .". ..... '" 0 N .". (') LO ..... (0 '" 0 N LO LO N (') .". (0 '" 0
w<( CD <D ~ ~ N N N (') (') ~ ~ N N N N N (') (') (') .". (') (') ~ ~
$Z
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
ZUl CJ CJ CJ CJ ~ ~ CJ CJ ~ CJ CJ ~ CJ CJ CJ ~ CJ CJ ~ CJ CJ CJ CJ ~ CJ CJ CJ ~ ~
<(::J <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <(
~
1-0:: ~ $ ~ ~ ~ $ $ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ $$ ~ $ ~
, , , , , , , , , ,
-w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::Em <D CD <D <D CD <D CD <D CD <D CD CD CD CD CD <D <D CD CD CD CD CD CD <D <D <D CD CD <D
O::::E N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 0 <;> 0 0 0 0 0 <;> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <;> 0 0 0 0 <;> 0 0 0 0 <;> 0
o.z , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-d
"
;:l
<=
.~
~
<=
o
U
-
,
U
r--
-
"
:g
E-<
o
rl
I
r-
rl
-
,
U
t-
-
<l)
:g
E-<
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~Ul 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: f!:: 0:: 0:: 0::
$::J
WI
Ulh:~ N 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0
<(ui~ LO CD CD
00
j~", .". ..... 0
WCl;;E <D 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0
$~ ~
>-
o..b'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~<(] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::Jo.. (0 (0 0 (0 (0 (0 0 '" '" (0
0..<( ~ ~
0
0::
W
f-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE C! C! 0 C! C! 0 C! C! 0 0
~o (0 (0 0 (0 (0 00 0 '" 0; 00
~~ ~ ~
0
o..w Z Z Z Z Z Z 0:: Z Z Z
~o.. W W W W W W ::J W W W
~j: 0 0 0 0 0 0 f- 0 0 0
W
C) 0 C! C! 0 C! C! 0 C! C! 0
Z 0; '" '" 0; '" '" 0; '" '" 0;
~ N N N N N N N N N N
,
Zo.. C! C! C! 0 C! 0 0 C! 0 0
$- ..... ..... ..... 00 (0 00 00 (0 cO ,..:
OI .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .". .".
f-Ul
zo::
OW
-OJ (') N (') (')
f-~ (') (') (') CD <D LO LO LO .". (')
~::J
UlZ
~w <(
~~ N (') .". '" ~ 0 (') ~
w<( ~ CD ~ ~ ~ N N (') (') ~
$Z ~
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
ZUl C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C)
:5::J <{ <( <( <{ <( <( <{ <( <( <(
f-O:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~
, ,
-w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~OJ <D CD CD <D CD <D CD CD CD <D
o::~ N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 0 0 '? 0 0 '? 0 0 '? 0
o..z , , , , , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'8C
.....
.....
I
t-
.....
-d
<l)
g
-'2
o
u
-
-'c
({J 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
00-
rJ
I!nU 17-1? Figure 17C-1 Map Showing Locations of
RECEI
VV:LSOf\! rvilLL
AVE
MARIA
UTILITY
COMPANY,
LLLBUgc";<'
----- ---- --. /.
FOLDER#
,...",\>il
June 21,2004
Mr. Craig J. Pajer, P.E.
WilsonMiller
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
Attachment 17.E-l
Re: Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DRI
Dt:ctf(Vl1. PdJcr.
We are responding to you your service availability request letter dated June 10,2004. Sewer and
water service for the referenced project is not available at this time
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP. (AMUC) is in the process of securing a franchise from the
Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority pursuant to Collier County Ordinance, approval of
which is expected later this year. Similarly, AMUC has also submitted to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, applications for a 1.0 mgd water and .75 mgd wastewater treatment facility
("Phase I") located within the site location referenced above and expect approval by September 2004.
It is anticipated that AMUC will begin constructing Phase I of the facilities in November 2004
and will be complete during the timeframe of December 2005 to March 2006. The Phase I capacity of the
facilities has been designed in accordance with growth projections supplied by Ave Maria University and
New Town Development, LLLP and should provide sufficient capacity to supply the referenced property.
Connections are subject to the availability of sewage and water treatment capacity at the time formal
application is received, however expansions of the facilities will made based upon demands and other
binding commitments received.
Please note that any and all improvements that are constructed must be in accordance with the
AMUC Service Availability Policy and any other applicable policies, including payment of connection
fees.
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 239-262-2600.
Sincerely,
dfJ?;LNY'LLLP
Project Manager
17-13
Cc: Brian Goguen
John Jenkins, P.A. (Rose, Sundstrom & Bentley)
2600 GOLDEN G,~TE PilRKWAY
PHONE: 239.262.2600
NAPLES FLORIDA
PAX' 239.403-6808
'8C
QUESTION 18 - WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
Existing Level of Service: Not Applicable
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 100 gallons per capita per day
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 100 gallons per capita per day
A. Provide, in the table given below, the projected wastewater generation at the end of
each phase of development and proposed wastewater treatment. Identify the
assumptions used to project this demand.
The proposed wastewater treatment plant for Ave Maria will be built in phases to meet
demands generated by the Town as shown in Table 18.A-1. The project wastewater
generation is provided below. This information was obtained from FAC Chapter
64E.008.
Table 18.A-1
Projected Wastewater Generation By Phase
Phase
Existing
Phase 1
Phase 2 (Buildout)
Wastewater
Generation (MGD)
0.0
3.2
5.8
On-site
Wastewater
Treatment (MGD)
0.0
3.2
5.8
Off-site
Wastewater
Treatment (MGD)
0.0
0.0
0.0
B. If applicable, generally describe the volumes, characteristics and pre-treatment
techniques of any industrial or other effluents prior to discharge from proposed
industrial-related use(s).
There are no industries generating industrial wastewater planned within the Town.
C.1. If off-site treatment is planned, identify the treatment facility and attach a letter from
the agency or firm providing the treatment outlining present and projected excess
capacity of the treatment and transmission facilities through buildout, any other
commitments that have been made for this excess and a statement of ability to
provide service at all times during or after development.
Off-site treatment is not planned. All wastewater generated within the Town will be
treated within the boundary of the DR!.
n004- 135531 Vel': 01!. MPERRY
.J786-0n...ooo--o
18-1
8e
C.2. If service cannot be provided, identify the required capital improvements, cost,
timing, and proposed responsible entity necessary to provide service at all times
during and after development.
Not applicable.
D. If septic tanks will be used on site, indicate the number of units to be served, general
locations and any plans for eventual phase-out.
The Town will be served by a centralized on-site wastewater treatment plant and
wastewater generated is anticipated to be processed by this facility. There may be remote
septic tank locations that would not be practically served by the centralized facility.
E. Indicate whether proposed wastewater service will be provided within an established
service area boundary.
Wastewater service will be provided within the established service area of the Ave Maria
DR!.
JJ2004- 135531 Voc 01'- MPERRY
,J786-013-OQO.-O
18-2
8e
QUESTION 19 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Existing Level of Service: Not determined (Per Collier County Growth Management Plan,
Drainage Element,as amended May 9, 2000)
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event
A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any
potential flooding and erosion problems.
The Town of Ave Maria is located within the Camp Keais Strand sub-basin of the
Fakahatchee Strand Basin (watershed) as depicted within the Collier County Drainage
Atlas (January 2002). The Fakahatchee Strand Basin drains to tidal waters adjacent to
the Gulf of Mexico.
The existing infrastructure within the site includes existing farm fields, farm roads, drainage
system, and farm retention areas. The site is located between the Camp Keais Strand and
the rights-of-way of Oil Well Road, Camp Keais Road, and Immokalee Road. Existing
surface water flow patterns consist of agricultural pumpage and overland sheet flow to
the existing farm detention areas. These detention areas discharge to the Camp Keais
Strand, which then conveys the run-off south with ultimate outfall to the Gulf of Mexico.
Reference Map 1-1 for the existing drainage patterns on the site.
B. Describe the various elements of the proposed drainage system shown on Map I,
including any wetlands to be used as part of the system, and discuss the design
criteria (including stage-storage discharge assumption) to be used for the various
elements. Provide typical cross-sections (showing dimensions, slopes and control
elevations) for any proposed lakes or swales. Identify the control elevation for all
drainage structures. Include information as to what design storm will be used for
what portions of the system.
The proposed conceptual surface water management system will consist of a network of
dry pre-treatment areas, lakes, dry detention areas, culverts and water control
structures. The system will store stormwater run-off for treatment and attenuation with
controlled discharge to the existing farm detention areas, with eventual outfall to the
Camp Keais Strand, as described above.
The control elevations for the project were determined by analyzing the following data:
1. Topographic elevations at wetland jurisdictional lines
2. Hydro-biological indicators
3. Seasonal high water elevations obtained from gauges installed at the site
The control elevations for the developed portions of the site were determined through the
use of the data listed above. Particular reliance was placed upon the use of the seasonal
high water elevations obtained from the monitoring gages installed at the site and the two
312004-135531 Ver011-MPERRY
,,3786-013-000--0
19-1
8e
SFWMD staff gauges installed within Camp Keais Strand at Oil Well Road (Keais858) and
Immokalee Road (Keais846). The seasonal high water elevations for Camp Keais Strand
were determined by evaluating water level data from the SFWMD database for both
Keais846 and Keais858 for the previous twelve wet seasons. The seasonal high water
elevation within Camp Keais Strand at Immokalee Road (SFWMD Gauge Keais846) is
20.5 feet-NGVD and the seasonal high water elevation within Camp Keais Strand at Oil
Well Road is18.7feet-NGVD.
The control elevations for the proposed basins will range from elevation 19.0 feet-NGVD to
elevation 22.0 feet-NGVD.
C. From Map I, indicate the total number of acres in each drainage area and specify the
acreage of any portions of drainage areas outside the site boundaries. Complete the
following table for on-site drainage areas.
The table below provides an estimated land-use summary for each phase of the
development. The final developed land-uses may differ from the information in the table
based upon the types of residential, commercial, and campus uses developed and the
sequence of development. Please note that the land-uses in the table below are
conservative assumptions typically used in water management permitting in Southwest
Florida which may include increased impervious acreages as compared to the land-uses
assumed in the summary provided for the irrigated areas (which use conservative
assumptions of higher pervious areas requiring irrigation application).
ralnage eas
Surface
Impervious Retention Open Space Total
Phase Surfaces (Acres) (Acres)' (Acres) (Acres)
Existing
Phase 1 1630 447 670 2747
Phase 2 1334 365 549 2248
Total 2964 812 1219 4995
Table 19.C-1
D' Ar
1 Category includes lakes, ponds, storage areas, etc. Not all of the anticipated areas are depicted
on the master plan, as these facilities are anticipated within each general land use category.
D. Specify and compare the volume and quality of run-off from the site in its existing
condition to the anticipated run-off at the end of each phase of development. (The
parameters to be used to define "quality" and methodology should be agreed to by
the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication
conference stage.) Identify any changes in timing or pattern of waterflows between
pre- and post-development conditions. Indicate major points of discharge and
.)3:=~3_10 Va.: 01!- MPERRY 19-2
8e
ultimate receiving water body(ies). Indicate what provisions will be incorporated in
the design of the drainage system, including a summary description of any Best
Management Practices to be utilized, to minimize any increase in run-off from the
site and to minimize any degradation of water quality in the ultimate receiving body
over that occurring in its pre-development state.
The developed basins of the project have been restricted to a peak allowable rate of
discharge of a maximum rate of 0.15 cfs / acre. The peak discharge of 0.15 cfs I acre is the
maximum allowable for projects located in the Fakahatchee Strand Watershed per Collier
County Ordinance 90-10. The existing farm system has the capacity to discharge from the
agricultural fields at a rate of 1.0 cfs I acre in the existing condition; the restricted discharge
of 0.15 cfs / acre in the developed condition will be less than the existing discharge capacity
of the agricultural operations at the site.
E. Who will operate and maintain the drainage system after completion of the
development?
The stormwater management system will be maintained by the Ave Maria Stewardship
District and/or master homeowners associations.
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
1. The concept plan of the complete drainage system, including the method of
conveyance of runoff, proposed outfall and off.site impacts (upstream and
downstream).
The conceptual surface water management system includes lakes, storm sewers, swales
and berms. Lakes and dry detention areas will be utilized to provide all of the required
water quality storage volume and the required water quantity storage volume. Storm
sewers, swales, and overland flow will convey run-off to the storage areas. The proposed
site has been divided into drainage basins with control elevations ranging from elevation
19.0 feet-NGVD to 22.0 feet-NGVD.
The water quality volume required within each of the developed basins within the Town is
the greater of one inch of run-off over the entire basin area or 2.5 times the impervious
percentage. The required water quality volume will be met through the proposed control
structures within the developed basins of the project.
The discharge rates from the drainage basins to the existing farm detention areas or
conveyance system have been restricted to a maximum rate of 0.15 cfs / acre as required
by Collier County Ordinance 90-10.
2. An analysis of the drainage system response (functional capabilities) to the 25-year,
3-day storm.
The minimum road crown elevation within each of the developed basins within Town will be
established above the peak stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event. The perimeter
berms for each of the developed basins of the project site will be set at or above the peak
stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day storm event. The minimum required finished floor elevations
/2004- 135531 V..-. 01!- MPERRY
_rB6-013-QOO.-O
19-3
8e
within each of the developed project basins will be established at or above the peak stage
ofthe 100 Year - 3 Day (zero discharge) storm event.
3. A breakdown of acreages: impervious, water bodies, green area, types of land use,
etc.
The plan includes typical impervious uses such as pavement, buildings, and lake areas
within the proposed residential and commercial developments. Prior to approval of the
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) for each phase of the development by the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) a detailed land use breakdown for the phase
will be reviewed and approved by SFWMD for consistency with the surface water
management system design.
4. Stage-storage and stage-discharge information for the project.
A projection of the storm stage and storage volume relationship for the anticipated land
uses and sequence of phasing has been provided in the table below. The calculated
storage volumes shown are estimated based upon the typical land use characteristics of
development in southwest Florida. The storm stage and storage volume relationship of the
surface water management system will differ from the projection below based upon the final
design. The surface water management system will be designed to limit the discharge from
the developed system to the offsite areas to a peak rate of 0.15 cis / acre (per Collier
County Ordinance 90-10) at the minimum road elevation and less than 0.15 cfs / acre for all
stages below the minimum road elevation.
Table 19-4
Staae/Storaae
Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage
Stage Area Volume Area Volume Area Volume
(acre) (acre-feet) (acre) (acre-feet) (acre) (acre-feet)
Phase I Phase I Phase" Phase" Build-out Build-out
Control Elev 446.6 0 365.4 0 812.0 0
(0.0)
Bottom of 480.1 463.4 392.8 379.1 873.0 842.5
Detention
(+1.0)
Top of Bank 647.8 1309.3 530.0 1071.2 1177.8 2380.5
(+2.5)
Minimum 781.9 1666.7 639.7 1363.7 1421.7 3030.4
Road Elev
(+3.0)
Typical proposed development elevations.
~J~O:~3_10 V<>r 01'- MPERRY 19-4
8e
The site has been divided into drainage areas with control elevations varying from elevation
19.5 feet-NGVD to 22.6 feet-NGVD. The minimum road elevations are typically three feet
above the basin control elevation and the minimum finished floor elevations are typically
four feet above the basin control elevation.
6. For those projects being reviewed under the Coordinated Review/Concurrent
Processing for drainage permits, the data requested for a Surface Water
Management Permit is required.
Option a.
What regional effect will post-development land use have on water table and
depression storage in comparison to pre-development storage and drainage
patterns? This should include any regional impacts to take levels or stream
flows whether regulated by SWFWMD or not.
Not applicable.
Option b.
Compare pre- and post-development hydrology and hydraulics of the
watershed (i.e., runoff characteristics, flow hydrographs, low flow, flood
elevations) and what regional effects this development will have.
Not applicable.
From FGFWFC Guidelines for Completion:
1. On a vegetation map of the site, show the location of all proposed
retention/detention lakes and ponds, swales, water control structures, and other
water management system facilities.
The generalized locations of major lakes are shown on Map H and Vegetation is shown on
Map F-1. The majority of lakes are planned in areas previously cleared of vegetation for
agricultural activities. Prior to approval of the ERP for each phase of the development by
the SFWMD, the specific locations of the lakes will be reviewed and approved by SFWMD.
The locations of the proposed control structures from the developed areas of the site to the
existing farm detention areas have been shown on Map I.
2. Provide design detail for proposed lakes, ponds, swales, etc., including depths, side
slopes, littoral zone creation, proposed wetland vegetation to be planted, high and
low water elevations and inundation duration, and hydrologic connections to native
wetlands or other stormwater management facilities.
In portions of the lakes that are not planted with littoral plantings, the proposed lakes at the
site will be sloped from the top of lake bank at a slope of four feet horizontal distance for
each one foot of vertical elevation change to a lake depth of six feet below the control
elevation. In portions of the lakes that are planted with littoral plantings, the proposed lakes
will be sloped at eight feet horizontal distance for each foot of vertical elevation change to
the anticipated low water elevation of three feet below control elevation and then at a slope
of four feet of horizontal change to each foot of vertical change to a depth of six feet below
the control elevation. The slope of the lakes will be at two feet of horizontal distance for
,12004- 135531 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
.J786-013-0Q0.--O
19-5
8e
each one foot of vertical elevation change from an elevation of six feet below control
elevation to the maximum lake depth at 35 feet below control elevation.
The lake cross-section described above represents a typical lake bank cross-section.
There will be some exceptions for vertical lake bank treatments during the final design of
the development. Should steeper bank slopes be utilized in a lake, flatter slopes will be
implemented, in accordance with applicable regulatory codes, to compensate. Flatter
slopes may also be utilized within a lake, as a part of the design, to create littoral planting
areas along the bank.
The littoral planting species selection and the elevation strata for each species will be
reviewed by Collier County as a part of the Lake Excavation Permit submittal and the
survivability of the plantings will be insured through bonds provided to Collier County until
the county defined success criteria for the survivability of the littoral plantings is
accomplished.
The lake system will be interconnected with the native wetland areas and the discharge
rates from the lake system to the native wetland areas will be controlled using discharge
weirs to maintain the natural flow of surface water to the native wetland areas.
3. Discuss the proposed functioning of the stormwater management system with
emphasis on impacts to native plant communities and mechanisms to ensure
continued viability of these communities.
The proposed development of the surface water management system at the site is
expected to extend the hydro-period of the existing wetlands and provide a more natural
flow of surface water to the wetland areas. The current farming operations at the site
involve pumping of runoff from the farm fields to the wetland areas at a rapid rate; the water
management system proposed for the developed site will release runoff from the surface
water management lakes at a reduced rate over a longer period of time following water
quality treatment in the lakes.
312004- 135531 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~3766-0t3-{)()()- - 0
19-6
Be
QUESTION 20 - SOLID WASTE/HAZARDOUS WASTE/MEDICAL WASTE
Existing Level of Service: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average
disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
Adopted Level of Service Standard: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the
average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
Level of Service After Project Buildout:: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at
the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
A. Provide a projection of the average daily volumes of solid waste generated at the
completion of each phase of development. Use the format below and identify the
assumptions used in the projection.
Collier County's contractor hauler, Immokalee Disposal Service, will collect solid waste
generated at the Town of Ave Maria. Single-family residential areas within the Town will
use the typical Collier County standard garbage containers provided by Collier County for
curbside pickup. Recycled materials will be collected from curbside recycling containers
through contract haulers. Residential recyclables and horticultural waste will be collected at
the curb on a weekly basis. Anticipated solid waste generation is provided in Table 20.A-1.
Construction debris will be collected and processed by a local business specializing in the
recycling of construction products.
Commercial and institutional facilities will utilize dumpster containers for the storage of
garbage and rubbish. Recycling containers will be used to store recyclables in the
commercial, university and institutional areas.
Solid waste collected at the Town of Ave Maria will be hauled to the Immokalee Landfill for
processing. The Immokalee Landfill is planned to be closed and converted to a solid waste
transfer station by Collier County. At such time, the solid waste collected at Ave Maria will
be hauled to the Immokalee transfer station, prior to being transported to the Collier County
Landfill. Discussion with Collier County indicates plentiful capacity at the Collier County
Landfill for the next 20 years.
Solid waste generation estimates are shown in Table 20.A-1. These estimates are
based on the criteria published in the State of Florida, Department of Environmental
Regulation Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Technical Assistance
Handbook, October, 1976. These generation rates do not account for anticipated
reductions in the disposal rate through source reduction and recycling. The Town of Ave
Maria will strive to meet the state's goal of achieving a 30% reduction between the
generation rate and the disposal rate through recycling programs. Table 20.A-2
demonstrates the anticipated benefits of the recycling program. At the request of the
County Manager, Ave Maria University will establish a special recycling program
focusing on the further reduction of solid waste from the university. The exact details of
this special program have not been established.
7/2312004-135531 V"r:Oll.MPERRY
03786-013...000--0
20-1
Be
Table 20.A-1
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Phase Domestic Solid Waste Domestic Solid Waste
Cubic Yards/day Tons/day
Existing 0 0
Phase 1 61.5 18.5
Phase 2 (buildout) 111.0 33.3
Table 20.A-2
Anticipated Benefits of the Recycling Program
Units Proposed
Garbage Garbage Garbage
Source/Housing type Units Phase 1 Year 2011 (Ib/day) (ton/day) (yd3/dav)
Residential Dwelling Unit 6,010 24,040 12.0 40.1
Retail ft2 410,400 5,335 2.7 8.9
Office ft2 276,600 5,532 2.8 9.2
Hotel room 110 220 0.1 0.4
Medical ft2 15,000 300 0.2 0.5
Civic ff 115,500 1,502 0.8 2.5
Total before Recvclinq (Phase 1) 36,929 18.5 61.5
Grand Total with 30% Recycling (Phase 1)
25,850
12.9
43.1
Units Proposed
Garbage Garbage Garbage
Source/Housing type Units Phase 2 Year 2016 (Ib/day) (ton/day) (vd3/day)
Residential Dwelling Unit 11,000 44,000 22.0 73.3
Retail ft2 690,000 8,970 4.5 15.0
Office ft2 510,000 10,200 5.1 17.0
Hotel room 400 800 0.4 1.3
Medical ft2 35,000 700 0.4 1.2
Civic ft2 148,500 1,931 1.0 3.2
Total before Recvclino (Buildout) 66,601 33.3 111.0
Grand Total with 30% Recycling (Buildout)
46,620
23.3
77.7
B.1. Please specify the extent to which this project will contain laboratories, storage
facilities, and warehouse space where hazardous materials may be generated or
utilized. What types of hazardous waste or toxic materials are likely to be
generated? Will a hazardous materials management plan be prepared covering all
7/2312004- 135531 V..r: 01!- MPERRY
0378&-013-lX!O-.O
20-2
Be
uses of hazardous materials on-site? If so, please discuss contents and
enforcement provisions.
Waste generated by the uses proposed for the Town of Ave Maria does not meet the
definitions of Industrial, Hazardous or Special Waste listed in the glossary of the above-
cited reference. Retail, service and community activity solid wastes are included under
the Domestic Solid Waste category.
B.2. Please discuss what measures will be taken to separate hazardous waste from the
solid waste stream. What plans and facilities will be developed for hazardous or
toxic waste handling, generation, and emergencies?
Any business found within the development that generates hazardous waste shall be
responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of the hazardous waste
generated by such business. However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste
storage facilities contrary to the Collier County zoning regulations.
B.3. Please identify off-site disposal plans for hazardous waste generated by this
development and provide assurance of proper disposal by a qualified contractor.
Any off-site disposal of hazardous waste would be the responsibility of the business that
has generated the hazardous waste. All local and state regulations will be followed in
the proper off-site disposal of hazardous waste.
B.4. What local and state regulations, permits and plans will regulate the generation and
handling of hazardous waste at this development?
Any business found within the development that generates hazardous waste shall be
responsible for following all local and state regulations pertaining to the generation and
handling of hazardous waste at this development.
C. For all waste disposal planned (on or off site), attach a copy of the letter from the
developer describing the types and volumes of waste and waste disposal areas
requested, and attach a letter from the agencies or firms providing services
outlining:
1. the projected excess capacity of the facilities serving the development at
present and for each phase through completion of the project,
It is anticipated that the municipal solid waste from the development will go to the
Immokalee Solid Waste Transfer Station (to be completed at the end of 2004, per
conversation with Collier County Solid Waste Staff). The transfer station is to
have a design capacity of 150 tons per day with a projected flow of 12 to 20 tons
per day for the next 5 years. Municipal solid waste projections for the year 2016
have the development sending 56 tons per day to the transfer station.
Ultimate disposal of the municipal solid waste will occur at the Collier County
Landfill. Discussion with Collier County's Solid Waste Department indicates that
this facility will have capacity for the next 20 years.
112312004- 135531 V.. 01\. MPERRY
03786-U13-000-_0
20-3
8e
2. any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity,
The developer is not aware of any other contractual obligations for the disposal
of solid waste from the development.
3. a statement of the agency's or firm's ability to provide service at all times
during and after development (the agency or firm must be supplied with the
solid waste generation table in (A) above).
Immokalee Disposal Co, Inc. will provide franchise hauling services for both
municipal solid waste and construction and demolition throughout the
development. Please refer to Attachment 20.C-1, a letter from Linda Collins of
Immokalee Disposal Co, Inc., dated June 21,2004, verifying service ability.
7/2312004- 135531 Vef 01!- MPERRY
03786-0n-000--O
20-4
RECEiveD
WiLSON i\i11LLEf1
IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO, INC. ~UN~~al; ___
120 Jefferson Avenue FOLDER#
Immokalee, A 34142
Phone (239) 657-2729
Fax (239) 657-7478
June 21, 2004
Wilson Miller , Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
Attachment 20.C-l
RE: Servir:e Availability
Dear Mr. Pajer:
This letter is to assure you that disposal and recycling services will be
provided to you at the proposed Ave Maria University and New Town
Development sites located in Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and
west of Camp Keais Road. SeIVices will be provided upon your request.
If you require any additional information or have any questions, please
call me at 239-657-2729.
Sincerely,
(7f~L~ ~~
Linda Collins
20-5
raG
PART IV. Transportation Resource Impacts
QUESTION 21 - TRANSPORTATION
Introduction
The Town will be a mixed-use community, planned using the principals of walkability and self-
sufficiency. The Town Master Plan (Map H) depicts the general location and configuration of
major community land uses and features. The Town will consist of residential neighborhoods
("R") connected by a network of low speed streets and sidewalks, a mixed-use town center
("M"), where residents and students will be provided essential goods and services, civic
gathering places, entertainment, dining, employment, and housing. The Community Facility
District (CF) accommodates civic, institutional, governmental, and essential services necessary
to support Town residents. The Wetland Preserves (W), Parks {Pi, and Lakes (L) establish the
open space and recreational framework of the Town. Design guidelines and an integrated plan
for landscaping, signage, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and community services will tie
the neighborhoods together, creating a viable town structure, while providing for individual
neighborhood identity. The AMU Campus will accommodate a full range of educational,
administrative, housing, recreational and support facilities to support university activities.
The Town will include the following land uses identified in Chapter 28-24, F.A.C.:
11,000 residential dwelling units
690,000 square feet of retail/service
510,000 square feet of office
400 hotel rooms
a 6,OQO-student university
In addition to the DRI threshold uses described above, the Town may include up to 450 units of
assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and miscellaneous facilities,
35,000 square feet of medical facilities, public and private schools, uses such as golf courses,
lakes, open space, and community support facilities, and those uses customarily associated with a
university such as student and administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support
facilities.
The town uses are carefully planned to include commercial, service, civic, recreation, and
general support services within the Town of Ave Maria to satisfy the needs of residents and
students thereby minimizing the Project's potential impacts to the external road network. It is
anticipated that the Project will be a two-phase development with the first phase ending in 2011
and buildout in year 2016. For the purposes of trip generation, the anticipated development
parameters, by phase, have been aggregated by land use group as shown in Table 21-1.
7116J2004- 135532 Val': 02!- MPERRY
=
037fl6.013-000-PDRJ-28423
21-1
8e~II'
Phase Phase
One Sub Two Sub
Total Total
Measurement (2006- (2012 - Final
land Use Description Units 2011) 2016) Total
Residential Dwelling Units 6,010 4,990 11,000
Assisted Living Facilities Beds 0 450 450
Retail, Entertainment, Service Square Feet 367,900 322,100 690,000
Professional Office (General/Medical/Financial. etc.) Square Feet 276,600 233,400 510,000
Civic/Community/Miscellaneous (1) Square Feet 115,500 33,000 148,500
Medical Facilities Square Feet 15,000 20,000 35,000
Hotel Rooms 110 290 400
University Students 3,150 2,850 6,000
K-12 Schools (Private and Public) (2) Students 1,120 1,980 3,100
Table 21-1
Development Parameters
(1) "Civic, Community & Miscellaneous Space" includes churches, day care centers, healthlfitness centers, and libraries.
(2) For purposes of the traffic analysis. student population estimates a buildout include projected students that reside within the
to'vVfl (2,487) and students that will reside outside the town but attend the public or private schools 1Nithin the town.
The Town of Ave Maria will have direct access to Oil Well Road (CR-858) Road and to Camp
Keais Road. The study area for The Town of Ave Maria is shown on Exhibit 21-1. The roads
analyzed included segments of CR-858 (Oil Well Road), Camp Keais Road, CR-846
(Immokalee Road), CR-951 (Collier Boulevard), SR-29, SR-82, and 1-75.
The roadway segments analyzed are subject to the measurement of the Project's significant
impact. According to DRI rules, a project has "significant impact" on a roadway segment if
development traffic volumes representing 5% or more of the existing plus committed (E+C)
roadway service volumes at the Level of Service (LOS) standard of Collier County's Growth
Management Plan, for all State and County roadways except for Florida Intra-State Highway
System (FIHS) roadways. The Florida DOT establishes LOS standards and corresponding
service volumes for FIHS roadways. 1-75 is the only FIHS roadway within the study area.
"Adverse impact" is measured based on the level of service standards of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan, except for FIHS roads, where the Florida DOT standards control.
The major intersections within the study area were reviewed to determine if they were
significantly impacted by the Project (i.e., development traffic represented 5% or more of the
service volume at the LOS standard for anyone approach). Intersection capacity analysis was
conducted on those intersections shown in Table 21-2 that met the significance test or were
found to be adjacent to an adversely impacted roadway segment, with the exception of those
intersections for which analysis was waived in the methodology meeting.
1/1612004-135532 Ver: 02!. MPERRY
~,
03786-0tJ-OOO.-PDRI_2B423
21-2
....
. ..
.... GI
N...
1-<(
ijj>-
-"
:r=>
><iii
w
8e
,,', ......
-
!4 ,
~.
(")
,
....
N
>
"
"
~
~ g
~ ii:
N a
~ i
11 "
~i~
r::u2
Table 21-2
Intersections Analyzed
C ~"....
8 .. .t:.i~
Intersection
Immokalee Rd._ at 1-75Southbound On/Off Ramp
Immokalee Rd, at 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
~-_._-_..__.__.._-----_._._--
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd.
----~----~----- .-----.---
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
------------..-----...----.
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
--.__..______._n__.._________.__.._.._
Immokalee ~~t Caml'l<eais Rd.
Immokalee Rd. (1st. St.) at S.R. 29 (Main St.)
- "----
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St.
-- ...----.....------...---.-.----.-
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at Immokalee 0"=---___.__
Fifteenth~ (SR29) at Lake Trafford Rd:..___
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
Oil Well Rd. at SR 29
-----_._-----_..__._.~
Camp Keais Rd. a~ Ave Maria Entrance
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
-------..-------------
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd.
Collier Blvd. at Pine Rid e Rd.
For roadway segments, the following conditions were analyzed.
. Existing Conditions.
. Future Conditions Without the Project.
. Future Conditions With the Project.
For intersections, the following conditions were analyzed.
Existing Conditions
Future Conditions With the Project
A transportation methodology section of the Pre-Application Document was submitted April 30,
2004 as part of the DRI Pre-Application Conference package. A transportation methodology
meeting was held with the review agencies, including the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
7/1612004- 135532 Ver: 02!- MPERRY
0-
037S6-013-000-PDRI_28423
21-4
Council and Collier County, as a part of the Pre-Application Conference on May 19, 2004.
Those in attendance during the transportation methodology meeting included the following.
8e
.,~,t
Donald Scott, Collier County Transportation Planning Department
Charles Barmby, Collier County Metropolitan Planning Department
Bernard Piawah, State Department of Community Affairs
Jeff Perry, Wilson Miller, Inc.
Gavin Jones, Wilson Miller, Inc.
A Supplemental Pre-Application Document that reflects discussions at that meeting was
prepared and submitted to the review agencies. The transportation methodology section of the
Pre-Application Document and the Supplemental Pre-Application Document dated May 25,
2004 are included as Appendix 21-1.
The following response to ADA Question 21 Transportation was prepared in a manner
consistent with the agreed upon transportation methodology.
A. Using Map J or a table as a base, indicate existing conditions on the highway
network within the study area (as previously defined on Map J), including AADT,
peak-hour trips directional, traffic split, levels of service and maximum service
volumes for the adopted level of service (LOS). Identify the assumptions used in
this analysis, including "K" factor, directional "D" factor, facility type, number of
lanes and existing signal locations. (If levels of service are based on some
methodology other than the most recent procedures of the Transportation Research
Board and FDOT, this should be agreed upon at the pre-application conference
stage.) Identify the adopted LOS standards of the FDOT, appropriate regional
planning council, and local government for roadways within the identified study
area. Identify what improvements or new facilities within this study area are
planned, programmed, or committed for improvement. Attach appropriate excerpts
from published capital improvements plans, budgets and programs showing
schedules and types of work and letters from the appropriate agencies stating the
current status of the planned, programmed and committed improvements.
Existino Roadway Network
The existing roadway network in the vicinity of The Town of Ave Maria is shown in Map
J. The major roads within the study area include CR-846 (Immokalee Road), Collier
Boulevard, CR-858 (Oil Well Road), Camp Keais Road, SR-29, SR-82 and 1-75.
Existino Roadway Conditions
For purposes of this study, the daily traffic counts reported in the Collier County
Department of Transportation 2003 Traffic Counts, the Collier County Annual Update
and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIRl. December, 2003 and the Lee County
2003 Concurrency Manaoement report, along with peak hour turning movement counts
conducted for this study, were used to evaluate existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of
the Project. Daily counts were converted to peak season, peak hour conditions using
the K factors presented in the table. 2003 traffic was inflated one year at historical
growth rates.
Table 21-3 provides the service volumes published by Collier County in the AUIR
711612004- 135532 Vet: 02!- MPERRY
CAIU,
0318l)..{)13-000.PORI-28423
21-5
Transportation Planning Database and by Lee County in the 2003 Concurrency
Management Report. Table 21-4 reports service volume developed for roadways where
service volumes or peak hour traffic counts were not available/published.
rise
2003 2l1{)4E~
Imated
Peak Peak Peak Vol. to
Hour Hour Hour Min.
Peak Oir. Peak Annual Peak Std.
AUIR Exist Min. Servies Oir. Count Growo. Oir. SV
Road Limits 10. Road Std. Volume Volume Statton# Rate Volume Rallo
Camp Keais Rd. Oil Well Rd. to Ave Maria Entrance 61 2U 0 860 160 626 17.5 188 0.22
Camp Keais Rd. Ave Maria Entrance to lmmokalee Rd. 61 2U 0 860 160 626 17.5 188 0.22
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 30 2U 0 1240 950 655 11.8 1,063 0.86
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Golden Gate Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 31 40 0 2180 1980 536 9.1 2,161 0.99
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Pine Ridge Rd. to Green Blvd. 31 40 0 2180 1980 525 4.3 2,065 0.95
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 46 2U 0 860 280 671 9.9 308 0.36
ImmokaJee Road (CR 846) Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd. 46 2U 0 860 280 677 2.7 288 0.33
Immokatee Road (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 46 2U 0 860 280 620 1.2 283 0.33
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oil Well Road to Wilson Blvd. 45 60 0 3190 1020 675 12.8 1,150 0.36
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Wilson Blvd. to Collier Blvd. 44 60 0 3660 1270 593 8.6 1,379 0.38
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Collier Blvd. to Oakes Blvd. 43 40 0 2320 2240 656 16.5 2,609 1.12
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oakes Blvd. to 1-75 NB 43 40 0 2320 2240 568 11.7 2,502 1.08
Immokalee Road (CR 846) 1-75 NB to 1-75 SB 43 40 0 2320 2240 568 11.7 2,502 1.08
Immokalee Rd. (SR 82) Hendry County line to Sunshine Blvd. 2U E 1170 504 L213 12.6 567 0.48
Lake Trafford Road N. 15 th St. to Lake Trafford 47 2U 0 760 640 551 2.3 654 0.86
SR 29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 82 2U C 670 110 615 0.7 111 0.17
SR29 CR B46 to Oil Well Rd. 83 2U C 670 450 665 00 450 0.67
Main 51. (SR 29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 84 40 C 1860 850 665 0.0 850 0.46
Main St. (SR 29) 1st. S1. (CR 846) to CR 29A South 84 40 C 1860 850 665 0.0 850 0.46
Main 51. (SR 29) 1st. 51. (CR 846) to N 15th 5t. 84 40 C 1860 850 664 0.6 855 0.46
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Main St. to Immokalee Dr. 85 2U C 860 470 683 4.4 491 0.57
N. 15th 51. (5R 29) lmmokalee Dr. to Lake Trafford Rd. 85 2U C 860 470 683 4.4 491 0.57
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd. to 5R 29 A North 85 2U C 860 470 663 5.9 498 0.58
N. 15th 51. (5R 29) 29A North to 5R 82 86 2U C 720 630 663 5.9 667 0.93
SR29 North of SR 82 87 2U C 720 290 591 3.7 301 0.42
5R82 5R 29 to Hendry County line 88 2U C 720 540 661 5.9 572 0.79
New Market 5t. (5R 29 A) Indian River 5t. to Main 51. 59 2U 0 1010 450 612 4.5 470 0.47
North lsl. St. North of Main St. 58 2U 0 1000 400 590 0.7 403 0.40
Table 21-3
Existing Roadway Conditions
Roadways with Published Service Volumes
1/1612004-.-13&532 Ver:02'."'PERRY
0_'
03786-013-QOO.PDRI_28423
21-6
VI
CIl
E
~
"0
VI>
C CIl
o .!:!
.,~
"CIl
C(/)
0"
"'to CIl
..... >o.c
NIlIVI
CIl:it=
_".c
.clll~
1lI0C.
I-D::c
Cl='
C.c
;;t::
.!Il :it
>< VI
W>o
III
:it
"
III
o
D::
~c-ci>O
;giUif/)~
'It . -g..lt: ~
g1ii1i:3o
NW.ED..::I:
" . ~
:I.: :J
c..C"O
>
V .ll:~~
o::E =- ~ >-
~a..D..:I:~
~€s
c iI ~
C~I<
...:"
o ii 6
~cll
:0:
>.'C-
==cnM
cao~o
ouo>
_ C
co
6E'*'
u",
.:.c ".lIl: . B E
:5==~.2
D..::I:D..CCDO
"'>
-
':"Q.
0",
"....
00
~:::
"'....
~~
C-O
~U;
ii
" 0
WI<
>"
"'9
J!l
E
::i
'"
~
I<
'"
'"
ci
on
....
'"
<0 '" '"
on '" on
000
'" ..,. '"
..,. on 0
'" on '"
~
....
N
o
,.:
'"
'-:
~
N
....
o.
..,.
on
ci
'"
o
on
N
-
ci
'"
on
ci
'" '" '"
o 0 N
N N _
Q) M to to
CX) co t-- /'-
COCONN
c.6 oi N N
-
<0
ci
N
....
;0
.n
'"
'"
'"
o
on
'"
Cl
::>
N
;;;
~
~
iii
"
10
(9
c
"
'0
<5
(9
.9
~
Qi
:s:
6
-0
~ ffi
iii "
'" 10
~ (9
'" c
~ ~
" <5
Jj (9
'" '"
cD N
o
<0
.n
~
N ..,.
on N
'" ....
o 0
on '"
'" '"
Cl Cl
::> II:
N N
'" ....
N '"
~
-0
II:
-g Q)
co "*
'" -"
" 0
16 E
~ .s
"
>
UJ
.9
'0
>
iii
c
o
!!!
~
..,.
N
ai
~
iii
'"
"
'0
'"
~
"
>
UJ
.9
'0
'"
o
-0 II:
> "
co g
lfi ~
'0 E
'" UJ
e> ::>
~ ;;:
UJ ...:
.9
'0
'"
Ii.
Qi
:s:
6
~
N
;::
"!
~
'"
~
~
N
<0
....
-
;;:
:s:
o
on
'"
Cl
II:
N
....
'"
'0
'"
o
II:
Qi
:s:
6
N
-
ci
~
-
'" '"
on '"
ci c:i
~
N
;::
"!
~
on
~
~
N
<0
....
-
;;:
:s:
o
on
'"
Cl
II:
N
....
'"
-0
II:
'"
'"
"
'"
0.
E
'"
o
.9
'0
'"
o
II:
"
L>
C
~
E
UJ
::>
;;:
<(
'0
'"
Ii.
Qi
:s:
6
'"
o
ci
8e
on
~
~
....
..,.
ci
;0
'"
....
'"
o?
on
..,.
'"
..,. 0
on on
c:i ci
<0 0
on '"
'" <0
.... ~
on
o
"':
~
<0 0
.... ..,.
'" '"
cri ci
.... N
~
N
'" 0
cO r'
on
on
~.
~
o 0
o 0
o N
u'i a>
.... ~
on
~
~
o
o
;:
~ ~ u;
s: ~ M
o 0 0
on ..,. N
'" '" 0
N N
ClOID
II: u- U-
N ..,. ..,.
'" '" on
'" on on
'"
N
II:
en
.9
-0
II:
.c
L>
'"
"
ID
.!!l
-E
o
ID
.9
~ ~
'" 0
II: ci
o .
.9 5
gJ :::
ffi ;=-
0;
"
o
z
-0
II: -0
'" II:
"00 Q)
" "
'" OJ
0. -"
E 0
'" E
o E
'0
'"
o
II:
Qi
:s:
6
on on
";- "';-
-."!-,,..,.,)
.....
,
.....
N
~
"
~ "
~ ~
~ a:
pj ~
~ 8
~ ~
~"~
~~8
Existino Intersection Conditions
8e
-
Existing PM peak hour, peak season intersection capacity analysis was conducted for
the intersections in the table below.
The intersection capacity analysis used recent turning movement counts conducted by
Wilson Miller, Inc. Traffic count data, by intersection, is included in Appendix 21-2.
The existing PM peak hour, peak season levels of service for intersections under study
are summarized below in Table 21-5. The detailed intersection capacity analyses,
performed using SYNCHRO Version 6 software (based on the 2000 Highway Capacity
Manual), are provided in Appendix 21-2. (Note: Electronic versions of the SYNCHRO
network and the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS)
travel demand model files are provided on the accompanying CD-ROM.)
Table 21-5
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Existing 2004 Traffic Conditions
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
Averaae Worst Movement (Un-
Signalized Only)
Levolof
Service Delay Move- Delay
Intersection (LOS) (Sec.) ment LOS (Sec.)
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramp C 27.7
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp B 10.9
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd. D 37.6
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd. D 36.1
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd. E 70.3
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd. B 11.3
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd. A 8.2
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. A 3.3 WB B 12.8
Immokalee Rd. (1st. St.) at S.R. 29 (Main St.) B 10.1
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St. B 11.2
Fifteenth st. (SR29) at Immokalee Dr. B 10.4
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at t.ake Trafford Rd. C 25.2
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd. A 12.6 NB D 32.0
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance N/A N/A
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. A 6.5 NB B 11.7
Oil Well Rd. at SR 29 A 5.0 EB B 10.3
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance N/A N/A
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. F 109.2
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd. B 15.8
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridae Rd. D 51.9
1/1612004-135532 V",:02!-MPERRY
~,
031ll6-01J...OOO-PORI-2B423
21-8
n C ,- .... j.....
M ~ ".'~r
"':~
Committed Road Improvements
A number of road improvements are currently under construction or programmed for
construction in order to help alleviate current and projected roadway level of service
deficiencies. Those committed improvements are summarized below in Table 21-6.
Table 21-6
Committed Roadway Improvements
Exist AUIR
Link FromfTo Road Proj.# Improvement
County Bam Rd. Da"s BI\d. to CR 864 2U 60101 2L TO 4L
Golden Gate Pkwy Airport Rd. to 1-75 40 99914 4L TO 6L
Golden Gate Pkwy 1-75 to Santa Barbara BI\d. 40 99915 4L TO 6L
Goodlette-Frank Rd. Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 40 60134 4L TO 6L
Goodlette-Frank Rd. Pine Ridge Rd. to Golden Gate Parkway 40 60131 4L TO 6L
Collier BI\d. (CR 951) Immokalee Rd. to Golden Gate BI\d. 2U 65061 2L TO 6L
Collier BI\d. (CR 951) Davts She!. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 40 66062 4L TO 6L
Collier BI\d. (CR 951) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to US41 40 66061 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. US 41 to Airport Rd. 40 66042 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. Airport Rd. to 1-75 40 66043 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. 1-75 to CR 951 40 69101 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. CR 951 to Wilson BI\d 2U 60018 2L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. Wilson BI\d. to Oil Well Road 2U 99920 2L TO 6L
U"ngston Road-III Immokalee Rd. to Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. 62071 NEW 6L
U...;ngston Road-III Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 62071 NEW 6L
Rattlesnake Hmck Rd. Polly A-..e. to CR951 20 65022 2L TO 4L
Santa Barbara BI\d. Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Rd. 40 62081 4l TO 6L
Santa Barbara BI\d. Radio Rd. to SR 84 40 99909 4L TO 6L
Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Airport Rd. to Logan BI\d. 2U 63051 2L TO 6L
Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Logan BI\d. to CR951 2U 99927 2L TO 6L
1-75 At Golden Gate Parkway NEW INlERCHANGE
Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or scheduled for
construction within the next three years were considered to be committed improvements.
These were found in the Collier County AUIR on Public Facilities (December, 2003) and
FDOT's Adopted Work Program for Collier County, Fiscal Year 2003/2004 - 2007/2008.
7/1612004.135532 Ver:02I-'-PERRY
~~
03786-013-llOO-PORI-2842J
21-9
rae
B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development.
State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by
land use types, sources of data, model split, persons per vehicle, etc., as
appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation
(including the Florida Standard Urban Model Structure or the Institute of
Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the pre-
application conference stage.
Project Development Parameters
The Town of Ave Maria is being programmed to develop in two phases, with Phase 1
ending in 2011 and Buildout in 2016. The Project's development parameters are
provided below in Table 21-7.
Phase Phase
One Sub Two Sub
Total Total
Measurement (2006 - (2012 - Final
Land Use Description Units 2011) 2016) Total
Residential Dwelling Units 6,010 4,990 11,000
Assisted Living Facilities Beds 0 450 450
Retail. Entertainment, Service Square Feet 367,900 322,100 690,000
Professional Office (General/Medical/Financial, etc.) Square Feet 276,600 233,400 510,000
CividCommunity/Miscellaneous (1) Square Feet 115,500 33,000 148,500
Medical Facilities Square Feet 15,000 20,000 35,000
Hotel Rooms 110 290 400
University Students 3,150 2,850 6,000
K-12 Schools (Private and Public) (2) Students 1,120 1,980 3,100
Table 21-7
Development Parameters
(1) "Civic. Community & Miscellaneous Space~ includes churches, day care centers, health/fitness centers, and libraries.
(2) For purposes of the traffic analysis, student population estimates a buildout include projected students that reside 'Nithin the
town (2,487) and students that will reside outside the town but attend the public or private schools within the town.
ITE Trip Generation
Consistent with the current policy of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council,
Project trip generation was based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook (7th Edition), and
application-specific data based upon alternative trip generation studies. The trip
generation calculations for Phase 1 and Buildout are presented in Tables 21-8 and 21-9,
respectively.
7116/2004- 135532 V<w 021- MPERRY
c_,
OJ786-013.-000-PDRI_28423
21-10
I: ~
0"-
00:';:;"1"""
'1lI0
..-...N
NGI-
GlI:..-
-GIGI
~Cll/l
I- .e- ~
'=11..
~.. 01
Il:)E
O-O~
:l!'".
.. w
~ m
. 0
II :Ji::
.. 0 .
;:Exi;:
.. w
~
:: ~ 'iii
0..0'0
:l!'">-
..
o
.,
'"
0> 0>
ro
q
0> M
N ro
~-
~
~
.. u
"if
'3 e
0>-
>-
O'l ('") ...... 0
~ ~ {;:; 0
1'---- ....... ~,f to
~ !!l
e;g
'-
Z 0
o 0
~ 0
o M
N
c
.
~~
, 0
.oo
.
.
:l!
'"
.c
::J
'"
~
~
o
o
~
~
u
.
.
"
w
"
'"
o
-~
,
o
:I:
u
~
~
o
J'l
~
o
~
"E (I) Iii
m C
u.. en 'E
Q) E ~
0> 16 "Iii
c ~ ~
U5 <( 0:::
.
w~
>- 0
-"
o
N
..
,
e
"
.
.
oo
~
.
~
'0
U
.
.
"
.,
'"
.,
..
'"
N
.,
0>
N
'"
0>
'"
M
..
.,
N
M
o 0
~ ~
O. ~
222
'c 'c 'c
::> :J ::J VI
C) en Ol U
~ ~ ~ ~
Q) Q) Qi
~ ~ ~
~
00
,
o
~
o
.
o
I::
E
,
c
E
o
u
c
o
o
~
~
~
o
m
;;
o
'"
c
.~
,
o
:I:
"3
'"
5
.c
~
"'
o 0
N M
N N
;;;
N
'0
~
;;
e-
o
>-
~
E
'"
~ ~ c::
'E~~E::-'E~
~ Q) IU ~ "0
(ll E U, Q) "*
~ 16 ~ ~ "iii
OJ !t ::E OJ .-e
o
~
~
u
.
.
"
i!
.
o
.
"
~
C
~
~
.~
8!
'"
c
.>
::;
u
~
1;;
in
.-e
..
~
N
;;
..
M
~
'"
;;;
o
;::
'"
-c
00 ::J
8 E
fi. "ii5
.
o
]j
:l'
o
;;
M
..
..
~
'"
~
N
.,
'"
0>
'"
N
":
~
~
~
00
C
~
u
,
ii5
00
C
~
u
,
ii5
~
o
~
~
N
.,
N
~
~
'"
..
'"
o ~
~ '"
,.,
00
C
~
u
,
ii5
~
N
M
N
~
~
;;;
~
o
0>
M
~
'"
N
~ $
C c
~ ~
o 0
g g
-~ -~
o 0
~ ~
"' "'
o 0
N N
'" '"
o
M
'"
N
'"
~
N
'"
~
G) 41
~ ~
u. u.
~ e
m m
, ,
~ ~
"' "'
'" '"
m Gl Ci) Q)
Q) CD Q) Q)
LL u.. lL u..
e e e e
IU ctI Al ltI
il-.LL~
(f) U) en (/)
::t: :x:: ::t: ::t:
M
N
M
~
~
'"
N
;;;
N
~ j
"0 0
l' 0
~ ~ ~
~ !? ~
it ~ B
'" 0 0
M ~ <0
~ ~ ~
0>
N
o
N
'"
'"
M
'"
o
.,
~
M
'"
~
M
.,
0>
'"
M
o
.,
o
M
"'
M
o
~
..
~
~
0>
M
N
o
N
0>
N
;I
N
o ~
o .,
'" ~
~
00
c
~
u
,
ii5
%
o
,
E
E
o
o
..
'E
~
u
.~
~
'"
u
~
x
::E
"
o
~
o
"'
~
'"
I
5
a 'c
o ,
~ :::>
o "
"' 0
~ ~
m 0
C "'
~ ~
E '5
~ u
W ~
M
..
c
~
o
~
o ~
';. ~
~ :3
'" 0
'" 0>
~ ~
~
~
N
;;;
"
o
o N
N N
~ ~
00
~
:i.
g
:g
.S
<D
~
~
..
~
c
~
"
~
~
'" 5
11. 0
~ ~
(J C!)
o
~
:;;:
~ ....... N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ v
~
:I:
m
~
c
~
u
.~
~
'"
u
~
x
::E
u.
::E
u:
"'
"
o
~
o
"'
~
'"
I
5
(5 "c
o ,
~ :::>
o "
"' 0
~ ~
o 0
C "'
~ ~
E '5
~ u
W ~
N
~ ~
g (5
~ ~
$ .~
~ !?
'C "E
.. ::J
c
o
~
o
o
,
~
w
~
e
,
~
o
~
c
~
o
~
o ~
';. ~
m D
o ::i
~
.c
, 00
E 5
E ~
o c
0-"
:28
> .!Q
(3::2:
~
c
~
o
00
00
~
o
u:
o
E
[j
..
o
'5
~
m
o
-a
~
::E
~
IE
o
m
."
c
o
o
!f
m
o
'5
~
~
m
~
c
~
"
~
~
~ ,
~ 0
.. 0
z. "
(3 (!)
~
o
8
m
c
o
.~
00
$
e
..
0>
'"
..
~
M
N
'"
o
'"
~
~
.,
00
~
"
:I:
o
M
..
~
~
o
N
..
~
.,
'"
<0
~
N
".
M
.,
N
"'
0>
'"
'"
M
;;
~
u.
~
m
,
~
"'
'"
..
o
~
o
'"
o
."
~
o
~
"'
o
N
'"
..
'"
c
~
,
.
;;
8!
0;
o
-~
~
"'
m
c
o
~-
~ 0
.. ~
"'~
c __
'c.~
8"!!
~c
"'w
'"
c
~
E
c
-m
"
~
c
w ~
o
2 .~
~ ~
"'"'
;;;
o
,.,
..
~
N
,.,
~
;;
'"
<0
'"
'"
'"
'"
..
"0
>-
;;;
0> ~
~ C;
N
o
o
.,
N
M
;f
..
E
$
.:l
8e
o
o
'"
~
0;
,.,
M
~
~
,.,
N
o
E
$
.E
~'.I!P'
..-
..-
,
..-
N
>
<
<
w
.
,
g ~
> .
N ~
~ 8
" ~
~~~
c~
0<0
0);0
;'I!N
NG>-
G)C'$
-G>O
.gel:!;!
I- ,a-'5
'=10
~ '" "' '" '" "' "' N V N ~ "' '" '" ~ "' '" '" ~ ~ '" " '"
. '" ~ N '" "' '" ::: '" '" '" '" '" '" v "' '" '" '" '" '" v
~ & E '" N ~ ~ N '" "' N "'- N
.. " " ~ .,; ~ ri
.. w
~ '" "' '" '" v v "' '" N '" '" " '" N "' N '" ~ '" "' ~ '" '"
. . 0 '" ~ "' " v ~ '" ;! '" '" '" '" '" '" v "' ~ '" ~ ~
0 ,,: ::
.. '" v '" v '" '" "'
::E~~ ~ ~ .,; oi ri
.. w
~ " '" ill '" '" '" '" '" " '" "' '" '" N '" " " ~ '" "' v '" ~
. ~ - '" '" '" '" '" v M ~ ~ "' '" '" '" '" "' ::: '" " " '"
0 . '" "' '" V N ~ "! "' '" '"
0..0'0 oi ~ oi ci .. "'
.."'"
..
... "' " ;: v '" ~ v '" " N " '" '" '" N '" ~ V N N N N "
.. U ~ "' "' "' " N V N '" N "' '" '" '" ~ v "' " M '"
c'" " '" '" N '" "' '" N '" '" v '" '" ~- '" N N V "-
- . '" "' as as ri 0; ~ ~ oi ri ~ .. oi ri '" "' :;:
. " N ~ N '"
15'"
...
~ J!l '" " v " " " " " " " " "' '" " "' "' " ;; '" " .. .. .
'" " 0;_ " ~ " " " " " " " ~ '" '" U; "' 0
~- '" '" "' V N "! '" '" " ~ 0; E E
E 5 N '"
ri ~ oi oi ~ ~ "' "' ... ~ 0
'- E
Z 0 W
" !!l !!l !!l !!l !!l ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;
0 'c 'c 'c 'c 'C 0 !!l !!l 0 0 ~ 0 . ~ ~ ~
E ::> ::> ::> ::> 0 ~ C C U- U- U- U- U- U- 0 0 U-
e J!l 0 E 0 0 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C '" m m m ~ 0 0 ~ . . ~ ~ ~ " ~
, ~ @ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . '0
. " '" 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ .~ '" I ~
. .. ~ .. .. .. in in in in C- C- C- C-
o ~ . . ~ "' "' "' "' "' "' "'
.. 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~
0
~
0 '0
m ~ ~
0 0 . ~ 0
W . ~ ~
~ 0 U U
0 0 I::: . 0 "'
~ ~ , ~
I E E m
.. ~ ~ I g
'C . :!:; E
u ~ m 0 N
. u E 0 u 0 :2
0 . 0 '" '0 'c ~ } 'S
c ;; ~ ~ .. 0 ~ -" '" ~
w 0 0 0 'E ~ ~ 0 ~
t:: 0 I m u ~ '0 0 C C ~ C
~ u 0 0 "' 0 '0 u
" ~ 0 0 U ~ 0 . IE 0 .
E 0 .. ." ::J '" '" ~ ~ :i; U U U ~ U
. C ~ u u g g 0
:g & J!l "' ~ ~ ~ m
U- . '" ~ "' ~ ~ 0
E ~ ... 0 0 ~ ~ . '" '~ '~ 0 a
0 to ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ;;; 0 ~ U ~ "- U
'" $ . E '0 . ..
0 . 'W 'C " " ~ > > ~ >- .l5 0 0 0 Z:- '0 0
en .. & ~ 0 0 :;; ~ :;; '0 'C ~ . ~ ~ . () ~
'" "' '" I ill "- ::> u 0 ::J "' "' <.!J <.!J "'
0 " " " v " 0 " N '" " " "' " " " " " "
w~ U;
... 0 N '" "' M ~ N N '" "' '" "' '" N N ;: :;: '" N
-U N N N N N "' "' "' "' "' "' "' '" '" v '"
..
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N '" v v v
e ~ ~
"
"
0
.
"
'0 J!l
0 . 0
. 0 u .
" ~ IE '"
'C u
~ "' 0 "
Z 0 ~ u
'C ;; .. m .. '~
u ~ ~ I 'u ~
. . 0 0
0 ... 0 is N . "'
c ~ 0 ..
0 'w '0 'c ~ if
m & 0 ~ ~ ~ 0
:!'. ~ '" .. 0
m -" C 0
u '0 ~ u . -
~ ... 0 ~ "' '0 '0 ~ u 'C . 0
... E " . 0 0 ~ c :1;; 0 "- .
0 '" ~ U .
E c 'E ::J " ~ U . () '" ~ -E
. . :;; J!l u . U
. ~ "' "' '" ~ mO
U- . U- ~ .. o ,_
E '\- . U- 0 ~ ... 0 ~ >- 0 .. . 0 a1"
~ . ;; ~ ~ ~ U ~ 0 U ~ "- U
'" to ~ '" .. :; E '0 . > . 'C o.~
. '" ~ ,~ ~ >- 0 Z:- ~ 0_
0 .. ." 0 ~ "0 "' . :;; cl: 'C ~ . ~ E . . 0 ~ 0
en '" :; en I "' ill ::> u 0 ::J u: :; <.!J () <.!J "'w
0 "
0
.!! ~ ~ .
1i u E
'C '0 IE 0
u ~ 0 0 '.
. E ~ to
0 0 .. .
C .. 0 E 0 0 C
~ 'E 0 0 0 0 W
()~ .. " .
0 0 ~ 0 U
~ 0 U ~
0 ." ,2 u 'C ~ :s ~
0 ~ > .!!! 0 ~
" & ~ (3~ ~ cl: i5 ~ ~
W :; "'"'
8e
,~
N
~
,
~
N
~
"
~
~ ~
~ it:
~ ~
:! @
~ 0
~ii
;;:,H3
Be
,,""
.
The ITE trip generation formulae, adjusted for internal capture, were the basis for the
expected external daily traffic volumes to and from the Town of Ave Maria traffic analysis
zone (T AZ) on the arterial road network. Consistent with the methodology outlined in the
FDOT DRI Modeling Workshop, the Town of Ave Maria TAZ zonal contents in the
residential and commercial land use data sets were first loaded with unadjusted
projections of dwelling units by type, hotel and motel rooms, school enrollment, and
employees by type (commercial and service). Commercial square footage projections
were converted to employment levels using floor area to employee conversion factors
derived from ITE trip generation data. Those initial Town of Ave Maria zonal contents
were uniformly adjusted (preserving relative magnitudes) until the external daily traffic
produced by the model was sufficiently close to the ITE based estimate.
Individual model iterations were not saved. The final model run that provided a close
correlation between ITE and FSUTMS estimates was saved, and is provided on the
accompanying CD-ROM.
A comparison of the resultant FSUTMS daily trip generation with the ITE trip generation
for Phase 1 and Buildout is provided below in Table 21-10.
Table 21-10
Trip Generation Comparison
Net New External Daily Trips
ITE Daily FSUTMS FSUTMS As %
Phase Trips Daily Trips oflTE
!"hase I (2011 ) _44,113 43,490 98.6
Buildout (2016) 76,312 75,840 99.4
Project trips on specific roadway segments were determined through select zone analysis
following the model assignment.
C. Estimate the internal/external split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of
development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a
discussion of what aspects of the development (i.e., provision of on-site shopping
and recreation facilities, on-site employment opportunities, etc.) will account for this
internal/external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were
estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model
Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed
design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project.
As a master planned mixed use, residential/university town, The Town of Ave Maria will
have retail, service, entertainment and related support services, including governmental,
civic and educational uses, plus recreational facilities for the use by the town's residents
and students. To support the town's geographic location, a significant collection of
commercial and support services are programmed to satisfy the majority of the daily
711612004- 135532 Ver: 021- MPERRY
-
037f16.-013-1JOO..-PDRI-2B423
21-13
rsc
needs of the town's residents, thus minimizing the need to travel along the external
highway network. Many of the employment opportunities created within The Town of
Ave Maria can and will be satisfied by town residents and students.
The town's commercial centers are strategically planned and located within the
development where they can be easily reached via internal local roads and non-
motorized pathways for bicyclists and pedestrians. The Town of Ave Maria is being
designed as a "pedestrian friendly" town with commercial services and recreational
facilities generally located in close proximity of the residents and students. The town
centers will provide retail and service establishments intended to capture those
convenience-type trips (to satisfy day-to-day needs) that would otherwise be making
longer trips on the adjacent arterial highway network.
Unlike smaller mixed use developments which are only able to support fractional or
limited commercial and support service uses, The Town of Ave Maria with its residential
and student population mix will have the "critical mass" necessary to support a wide
range of uses within its boundaries. Coupled with 95% of the student population of Ave
Maria University living on campus (based on past history and university policy) or in
affiliated housing within the Town, means a substantial amount of internalization of trips
will take place both on a daily basis and during the p.m. peak hour analysis period.
Daily traffic patterns of both residential and commercial land uses involve a variety of
purposes over the course of an entire day, starting and ending with the home-based-
work trips. During the mid-day, however, a multitude of purposes contribute the trip-
making patterns. Businesses may have employees coming and going all day long, as
well as travel generated by customers and deliveries. Residential land uses may
generate, school, personal business and recreational trips in additional to the work trip
purpose.
Unlike daily trip generation data, peak hour trip making characteristics clearly reflect the
dominance of the home-based work trip in the p.m. peak period for most uses.
However, during other periods of the day, such dominance does not necessarily occur.
For instance, retail, office and University trips during mid-day are likely to be more
externally weighted, since mid-day trips are more "business and service oriented".
Clearly, a daily traffic analysis would most likely reveal an internal capture rate for all of
The Town of Ave Maria's traffic at a much lower rate than during the p.m. peak hour.
When considering only the p.m. peak period in the analysis, it is clear that due to the
unique circumstances of land use-mix and location of The Town of Ave Maria, a higher
than normal internalization of traffic should occur.
A series of calculations were made to estimate the internal/external orientation of trips
within and external to The Town of Ave Maria during the p.m. peak hour.
The specific assumptions for internal capture for Phase 1 and Buildout are provided in
Exhibits 21-2 and 21-3, respectively.
7/1612004- 135532 Vare 02!" MPERRY
=~
0378fr01:>-oQO-PDRI-28423
21-14
~
:l
~-
N.... C.
. .... III
....0..
NN....
....-c.
-.... .-
!!!Ql':
J:Ul-
)(Illlll
W.cC
D.. ..
Ql
-
C
"
S~ w ~ ~ a
. m ffi N
~~ w ~ w
, ro ~ ~ ~ ~
0 .
~
~ ~ m 1:1 ~
. w ffi
M
" ~ M ~ ~ 8
1 0 0 C
m 0 N ~
~ . , ~ . .
ro N
, ~ i\ ~ ~
N
J 0 N ro
~ ~ N ro m
. w
ro ~ m
w
..
~
~
~
~ 0
*
r ~ ~
~ ~ ~- ~
l u
"'
~ ~ ~
l ~ ~ ~
~
! ~ N ~ .
~
"'\~
~\~
j
~-1~
" 0
]
U
~ ~lB
UJ
~/;l
/~
tY1'1
a [[i
IT '
LJ ~
Ga
G
GlIG
~\G
rn
~~
~
~
----
IT
118e
. w ~ .
."
." w ~ m m
.~ , ro
U
, 0 0 0 0
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ 0 0 0 0
. ~ ~ 8 8
" a a w a
j 0 ~ W M ~
N
. a ~ w .
. ~ w ~
. a 0 w 0
) 0 . w ~ ffi
. ro
. a m w
~ ~ m a
w m ,
~
~
-
"
" W
.
. .
0 ~ !
" u "
~ "' ro
~ " ,
l ~
~ m 0 "
! ~ N ~ .
~
[.~ r;y/~ "
III * tm N
m ~1i[3 ~\~ ~d ~n~
~ ~\\ /~
w
U
0:
w
..
~ G
~lI~ w IG ~~w ~lIG
[I]! ~ ~ w!
- +-------- +--------- (I)
i~. ~. I
~/;l. ~ L
/I~. ~~\ "re
... ('"> l5 .
> .
" ~
~ @
~ "
~"~
:d~
'00
l!!
~::::J
..,,,,-
, .... Co
....cl'll
........u
- I--c.
-... .-
III ::::J ..
_01-
::t:'C-
>< == l'll
W::::J C
Ill:>>
-
C
.
31 N m N w ~
~ ffi ~ w g
h ,
u
. ~ 6 ffi B ~
0
~
~ 0 ~ w m
. , ~
. ~
!
" . ~ ~ N . ~
. .. 0 c ~
. ,
:
~ .E N W
: . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ w .
3
~ N
, ~ ~ ~ ~
"i 0 c ~
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
" ~
0
~
0
~ u
~ ,
I j ~ ~
~
. u n
~ "
, ~ ~ ~
~ "
! ~ N M .
0
~\G [}/G
~~[
~a
G
~ ~UG ~lrG
~G
G\
li [J
-~ I
~ <
W "
W
G\
[l]
[i}~
Be ~
.
3; m ~ ,
~ m ~ ~
h w
u
. 0 0 0 0
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ 0 0 0 0
. ~ ~ ~ ~
. 0 0 , 0
i 0 ~ , . M
N
. N 0 , w
w W M ~
~
, 0 0 , 0
.. 0 , , , m
. m , w
I . m 0 w N
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
~
0
~ u
j
on -l'
j u ~_ i
"
~ q
, " 0
~ w
~ W 0 "
~ ~ N M .
,
0
~~ [}/~ ~
~* ~[
~ ~n~ ~\~ ~/I ~n~
~ ~\\ I~
w
u
'"
w
"-
~l[j [} 19 ~~ ~l~
m~. ~[!
W[f rri
[ij;/~ ~ !!
LJ N 0
~ ~
~ "
~"~
;;:~a
~8C
A summary of internal and external daily and peak hour traffic is provided below in Table 21-11.
Table 21-11
Internal/External Split - Vehicle Trips
Peak Hour
Vehicle Vehicle Peak Hour Vehicle
Trips (ADT) Trips (ADT) Vehicle Trips Trips
Phase Internal External Internal External
Phase I (2011) 23,753 44,113 3,915 ---- 2,400
~--- -
Buildoul (2016) 41,090 76,312 6,697 4,107
D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the
highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If
these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS, state the source, date and
network of the model and of the T AZ projections. If no standard model is available
or some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include
documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and
distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at buildout and at interim
phase-end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or
improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs
and/or comprehensive plans to be constructed during DRI construction; however,
the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections
on maps or tables of the study area network, on map or table for each phase-end
year. Describe how these conclusions were reached.
Collier Countv Travel Model
Future year traffic volumes with and without The Town of Ave Maria were estimated
using the Collier County travel model, which has two-digit facility type codes. Input data
sets were developed by WilsonMiller for the Project phase-end years using the adopted
2010 and 2020 model data sets.
Socio-Economic Data
The zonal data for 2011 and 2016 were derived through simple interpolation of the 2010
and 2020 ZDATA and EETRIPS files provided by the MPO. The resultant ZDATA1 and
ZDA T A2 files were reviewed for reasonableness in the vicinity of the Project.
Some of the T AZs encompass whole or partial RLSA sending areas that will generate
the stewardship credits used to develop The Town of Ave Maria. Some of those sending
areas are already chosen. It was assumed that the remaining credits necessary would
come first from sending areas that generate the most credits per acre. T AZ dwelling unit
projections were reduced by one unit per five acres for the acres in the sending areas
that generated the credits.
7/1612004.135532 Ver: 02i- MPERRY
0-
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
21-17
,
.~: 8e
ExistinQ Plus Committed (E+Cl Road Network
Future traffic volumes, both with and without the Project, were assigned by the Collier
County travel model to the E+C road network. The E+C road network was developed as
described above under the Collier County Travel Model.
Travel Model AssiQnments
Traffic volumes for both 2011 and 2016, both with and without the Project, are based on
the FSUTMS travel model assignments. Under the scenarios with the Project, the traffic
on each roadway segment attributable to the Project was identified using select zone
analysis. The FSUTMS input and output files, both with and without the Project, are
being provided to the review agencies on the accompanying CD-ROM.
Future Conditions Without Project
Future Traffic Conditions Without Project for 2011 and 2016 are reported for significantly
impacted roadway segments in Tables 21-12 and 21-13, respectively. The K factors
used in these spreadsheets are the same as those previously described. The peak
season daily volumes produced by the traffic model were reduced to Average Annual
Daily Traffic (MDT) using a model output conversion factor (MOCF) derived from the
FDOT continuous count station in Collier County. The service volumes for roads
analyzed in their current configuration are from the Collier County AUIR and the Lee
County Concurrency Management Report. For improved roads, the Collier County
service volumes are the average of service volumes in the AUIR for facilities of the same
configuration.
Future Conditions With Project
Future Traffic Conditions With Project for 2011 and 2016 for significantly impacted
roadway segments are reported in Tables 21-14 and 21-15, respectively. The peak
season factors, K factors, and service volumes are from the sources previously
described.
7/1612004- 135532 Ver_ 02!_ MPERRY
-
03786-013-000-PORI-26423
21-18
ae
Table 21-12
Phase 1 (2011)
Future Conditions Without Project
pswr 1
Peak
Hour
P," Peak PeakDir.
Hour Hour Road ection
MDT Two Om. PeakDI Conflg- Service
Roo" LImits V1 V2 Vavg. (2) Way (3) ST" (4) eellon uration Volume Vie
Camp Keais Rd, Oil Well Rd. 10 Ave Maria Entrance 10,000 8.900 819 626 0.77 631 2U 860 0.73
Camp Keals Rd Ave Maria Entrance to Immokalee Rd. 8,500 7,600 699 626 0.77 538 2U 860 0.63
ImmokaleeRoad Oil Well Road to Wilson Blvd. 45300 34700 40,000 35,600 3275 586 0.65 2129 60 3190 0.67
Immollalee Road Wilson Blvd. to Collier Blvd. 53400 42700 48,050 42,800 3938 593 0.71 2796 60 3660 0.76
Immokalee Road Collier Blvd. to Oakes Blvd 50100 39000 44,550 39,600 3843 658 0.64 2332 60 3500 0.67
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rei. 10 SR 29 23600 21400 22.500 20,000 1840 620 0.66 1214 2U 860 1.41
SR29 Qil Wetl Rd. 10 1-75 6400 6300 6,350 5,700 524 615 0.54 283 2U 670 0.42
SR29 CR 846 to Oil We/I Rei 7200 24300 15,750 14,000 1288 865 0.54 696 2U 670 1.04
MainS!. (5R29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Spirt 36100 35600 35,850 31,900 2935 665 0.54 1585 40 1860 0_85
Main st. (SR 29) 1sl. St. (CR 846) to CR 29A South 26400 28900 27,650 24,600 2263 665 0.54 1222 40 1860 0.66
Main St. (SR 29) 1st. St. (CR 846) to N 15th 51. 25900 26900 26,400 23,500 2162 664 0.55 1189 40 1860 0.64
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Main S1. to Immokalee Dr. 24700 23700 24,200 21,500 1978 683 0.52 1029 2U 860 1.20
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr. to Lake Trafford Rd. 25700 26800 26,250 23,400 2153 863 0.52 1120 2U 860 1.30
N.15thSt. (SR29) lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 26400 29900 28,150 25,100 2309 663 0.51 1178 2U 860 1_37
N.15IhSt. (SR29) 29ANorth 10 SR82 28600 23900 26,250 23.400 2153 663 0.51 1098 2U 720 1.53
SR82 SR 2910 lee Counly line 6000 6000 6,000 5,300 488 661 0.55 268 2U 720 0.37
Immokalee Rd. (SR82) Hendry County line 10 Sunshine Blvd. 17900 14700 16,300 14,500 1334 L22 0.62 827 2U 1170 0.71
North 1sl. SI. North of Main St. 8700 7200 7,950 7,100 653 590 0,86 562 2U 1000 0.56
Oil Well Road Everglades Blvd. to Immokalee Rd. 18,300 16,300 1500 724 0.56 840 2R 950 0.88
Oll Well Road AMU Entrance Road to Everglades Blvd. 12900 ,_ 14,250 12,700 1168 725 0.5 584 2R 950 0.61
Oil Well Road Camn Keais Rd. to SR 29 3200 3400 3,300 2,900 267 WM2 0.63 168 2R 950 0.18
(1) FSUTMS Aosignmenl Volum... (V1 300 V2) lit the ends otthe segment r. more than one) sre 3veragoo
(2) PSWT COIWerted to MDT with MOCF~0_89
(3) MDT converted to Peak Hour Two Way with K~O,092
4 Oirecllon3lSDl~fromCollierCoun orLee"'~' CountStlIllon
7/16J2004-.. 135532 V&r: 021. MPERRY
C~"3
0378G-013--000-PORj.28423
21-19
Be
"f_,",..,
Table 21-13
Buildout (2016)
Future Conditions Without Project
PSWT 1
Peak
Hour
Peak PeakDlr-
H~, PeakHou ROild action
AADT T~ Dm. Peak Dir- Config- Service
'~d LImits V1 V2 Vavg. (2) WaYl3) 5TM (') K'~ uratlon Volume V/C
Camp K6ais Rd. Oil Well Rd. to Ave Maria Entrance 10,400 9,300 556 62. 0.77 .59 2U 860 0.77
Camp Keais Rd. Ave Maria Entrance to Immokalee Rd 6700 10400 8,550 7,600 699 626 0.77 538 2U 860 0.63
Collier Blvd. Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 43000 47500 45,250 40,300 3708 655 0.67 2484 60 3500 0.71
Collier Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 49700 50200 49,950 44,500 4094 536 0.64 2620 .0 2180 1.20
Collier Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. to Green Blvd. 37000 36800 36,900 32,800 3018 538 064 1932 .0 2180 0.89
Everglades B1vd_ Oil Well Rd. to Golden Gate Blvd 5800 2900 4,350 3,900 359 636 0.58 208 2U 950 0.22
ImmokaleeRoad on Well Road 10 Wilson Blvd 44900 57800 51,350 45,700 4204 586 0.65 2733 60 3190 0.86
ImmokaleeRoad Wilson Blvd. to Collier Blvd. 54800 67600 61.200 54,500 5014 593 0.71 3560 60 3660 0.97
ImmokaleeRoad Collier Blvd. to Oakes Blvd. 51200 61400 56,300 50,100 4609 656 0.64 2950 60 3500 0.84
lmmokalee Road Oakes Blvd. to 1-75NB 67,400 60,000 5520 568 0.53 2926 60 3500 0.84
ImmokaleeRoad 1-75 NBlo 1-75 SB 59,300 52,800 4858 568 0.53 2575 60 3500 0.74
lmmokalee Road Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 21500 20700 21,100 18,800 1730 671 0.69 1194 2U 860 1.39
ImmokaleeRoad Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd. 24500 19800 22,150 19,100 1812 672 0.69 1250 2U 860 1.45
ImmokaleeRoad Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 26300 25500 25,900 23,100 2125 620 0.66 1403 2U 860 1.63
Golden Gate Blvd Wilson Blvd. to Everglades Blvd. 18,600 16,600 1527 652 0.69 1054 2U 950 1.11
1-75 SR2910CR951 31,200 27.800 2558 351 0.50 1279 'F 2020 0.63
1-75 Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. 43600 42100 85,700 76,300 7020 191 0.54 3791 4F 2940 1.29
Lake Trafford Road N.15th St to Lake Trafford 3700 18900 11,300 10,100 929 551 0.55 511 2U 760 0.67
SR29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 10700 11400 11,050 9,800 902 615 0.54 487 2U 670 0.73
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 37500 15500 26,500 23,600 2171 665 0.54 1172 2U 670 1.75
Main SI. (SR 29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 52800 53000 52,900 47,100 4333 665 0.54 2340 '0 1880 1.26
Main SI. (SR 29) 1st. SI. (CR 846) to CR 29A South 39700 41900 40,800 36,300 3340 665 0.54 1804 .0 1860 0.97
Main St. (SR 29) 1st. SI. (CR 846) to N 15th SI. 34500 34000 34,250 30,500 2806 664 0.55 1543 40 1860 0.83
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Main St. to lmmokalee Dr. 27700 26000 26,850 23,900 2199 683 0.52 1143 2U 860 1.33
N. 15th St. (SR 29) lmmokalee Dr. to lake Trafford Rd. 30400 31600 31,000 27,600 2539 683 0.52 1320 2U 860 1.53
N.15th St. {SR29) lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 32900 29200 31,050 27,600 2539 663 0.51 1295 2U 860 1,51
N.15th SI. (SR29) 29ANorthtoSR82 36800 30600 33,700 30,000 2760 663 0.51 1408 2U 720 1.96
SR29 North of SR82 6,500 5,800 534 143 0.53 283 2U 720 0.39
SR82 SR29to lee County line 27400 21700 24,550 21,800 2006 661 0.55 1103 2U 720 1.53
Immokalee Rd. (SR 82) Hendry County line to Sunshine Blvd 17,500 15,600 1435 l22 0.62 890 2U 1170 0.76
New Market SI. (SR 29 A) Indian River SI. to Main St 13500 12100 12,800 11,400 1049 612 0.52 545 2U 1010 0.54
North 1st.St. NorthofMainSt. 11500 10200 10,850 9,700 692 590 0.86 767 2U 1000 0.77
Oil Well Road Everglades Blvd. to Immokalee Rd. 23,500 20,900 1923 724 0.56 1077 2R 950 1.13
Oil Well Road AMU Entrance Road to Everglades Blvd. 19000 21100 20,050 17,800 1638 725 05 819 2R 950 0.86
Oil Well Road AMU EnlJance Road to Camp Keais Rd. 19,000 16,900 1555 WM1 0.53 824 2R 950 0.87
QilWellRoad CamO Keais Rd. to SR 29 10000 10400 10200 9,100 837 WM2 0.63 527 2R 950 0.55
(1) FSVTMS As!lignmenlVolumes (V1 and V2) al the ends oflhesegmer1l(W more than one} are averagoo:!
(2) PSWT conVErtoo:! to MDT wilh MOCF~.Bg
(3) MDT GOIlVSloo:! to Peak Hour T'M> Way with K~O.Oll2
41 DirecIionalSDlkfromCollierCountv,LeeCounl . orFDOTCounISlation
711612004- 135532 Va" 02\- t.lPERRY
0_'
03786-01J-OOO-PORI-28423
21-20
-,
o~:::'
~l~
~ "
- ~
I; ,
~ m
o
~ ~
~ ~
~
m
.
.
<
'" '" '" 2 2 2 z z z z z 3: 3: ~ " " " " " (") (")
;u ;u ;u 0 . . . . .
CD tll '" :;; :;: :ii " ~ ~ 3' 3 3 " " " " " " "
~ '" '" ~ '" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
'" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ 5' 5' ~ 5' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
" ~ . . . . . ^ ^
;U ;U ;U ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " " " ~ ~
01 01 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .
0 0 0 ~ '" '"
. . . 01 01 01 01 ;U ;U ;U ;U ;U ;U ;U ;U i
~ ~ ~ '" 0 0 0 0 ~ ;U ;U
;U ;U ;U ;U l!l '" . . . . ~ ~
l!l l!l '" l!l .!!) .!!) ~ ~ ~ ~ 01
.!!) ;U
CD
z i:o!
0 "
ro
00
:0 ~ 19 D '" 2 (") (") 2' p z tll r " 3: (") ~ - (") ~ 2 (") I ~ 2
~ ;u ;u . 3: 0 . . ;u ~ ~ g, . ~
'" ~ 0 " " p ~ " 3' en :;; " ~ ~
." ~ '" :;; '" .a c ~ tll :;;
;0 '" ~ '" '" 8; ~ ~ z 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 3:
'" 0 ~ c ~ " m S- o ., ~ ~ p ~ ~ '< ~ ~
.., c ^ ~ ~ " ~ . CD ^
~ , ~ .., ;u c ~ ~ 3: ~ ~ " (f) 0 0 a: CD ;u ~ (") ~ ;u
.., . ii "' I . 00 . ~ c 0 " . 0
S ^ '" ~ ~ 2 '" ~ . c ;u ;u ~ 0 '" c m ~
'" ~ CD 3 ~ ~ 3" "' . ~
"- 8 '" ~ n '" CD C ~ ~
0 cr 00 ~ c :ii ;u .,- ~ ~ '" ;u " ~ ,. ,. c ;u .:;: c
.., 0 (") ~ 00 ~ ~ ;u ~ c c ~ ~ 0 c ~ .
~ '" ~ t .c ~ -:., ;u 0 (") r ~ ~
tJ (") ~ c c 0 CD ~ C . g, ~ C 3 n
'" 8 ~ ~ '" . '" C r lli c ~ ~ ~ r-
~ 0 . . ~ ~
'" ~ " c ;u (f) 3" ~ '" ~ " 0\ (") z 00 ~. 00 '" c C 3: i
< ~ ~
0 S .., ::\ ~ ;u " c ;u ~ ~ 8; ;0 CD 0 ;u ~
C- o .:;: '" :;i ~ CD ~ '" '" 3" ~
" < "' 0 m '" lli '" .,- ". "' c ~'
" 0 r ~ < '" . '" 5' ~ ~ CD ~ "
~ 0 c- 3 . ~ p ~ % J> .,- 00 0 m
00 ~ " .a ~ ~ ~ ~ ::\
3 "- " ~ " Z ~ '" 3 . ~
" ~ ~ 0 0 ~ "
10 00 ;U ;0 c ~
. ~ ~ " ~ 5' ~ n
a ~ 5 00 ~ CD ~
0 ~ CD .,- ;0
~ ." . " ~ ~
rn a ~ ~
~ ! ~
cr <
~ 0 tJ
t "- "- ~ til - in '" '" ~ '" w EB Sj ,. '" ... ~ ~ '" S ..,
~
~ " ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ m 8J III .... \e '" '" -, 0 sa
~ .., ~ '" CD '" '" ,. '" '" '" ... '" '" '" ~
~ ~ ~ ....
~ i1' ~ ;S ~
0 ~
00 ::: in '" '" '" '" :.: w ~ w ... w &J - - -n
. g ~ .... 8 "' .... 111 '" :::! ... 0 f!l '" 8; ... .... n ell
~ 0 '" '" '" '" .... '" .... ,. 0 ... '" 0 c::
~ " ~ ii!
'" ~ ~
0 co
~ 00 0; - - in ~ '" &J '" w '" ~ ,. ... tll '" 0; 0; < < .!!. ell
0 ~ '" '" is .... CD ... "l .... '" w .... .... 8J '!'
~ '" '" w '" .... w '" '" '" 0 '" .... '" '" .... w '" ."
r " ell
~
rn ~ - '" ~
0 ::\ w - ... '" ,. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" w ... '" 0 S
0 " '", '$ '", '" '", ~ ',. 'w ~ 'CD ~ '0 '[:l 1:: 'gj '", '", ~ 'w '" <
c [lj 0 l':i ~ w gj ,. f'l l':i 8 .
~ " 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ..
0 c
" ro - - '0 3
0 " w - w '" ,. '" - ~ ~ '" '" '" '" .... .... w ,. '" '" ;S s, ~
~ . 1:D '.... '... '" '~ '~ "~ '~ 'm '" '~ i ~ '1!l 'CD '~ '- '.... rn ~
rn
in ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ 0 '" w ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
~ ....
~ .... - ,;: - < ~
~ w - w '" ... '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .... w ~ w CD '"
rn '", '8'i '~ ~ '", '", '", '- 'CD 1:D '0 '8 '.... '... '''1 '", b '", '", '" ~ n
. ffi w l':i 8 U; 0 l'3 ~ '" '" .... ~ ~ CD ...
< '" 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 '" 0
~
~
~ - " l'3 - w '" '" w w '" ~ ."
~
~ ~ '" '" '" '" w '" "' '" 0 w w '" w '" w w 1;3 ell
'", '0 '::: '\e 'CD b '~ '0 l!l 1:D '~ '~ '... 'w '", ~ '", '", '0 ~ w -~
w w '" '" CD ~ 0 ... '" '" ,. i'5 ~
'" '" 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" '" 0 '"
- - - ::: '" i'5 '" w '" '" " ::: :El~
w ... w '" '" '" '" CD .... CD .... 0 '" '" '"
'w '", '", '", 'f'l '", '... ~ '... '", '- '", ~ 1:D 1:3 '", '", '- '", 8 w
8 0 0 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 -<
0 0 0 0 0
::: - '" '" '" ... ~ ~ - '" ~ Sj '" l'3 ~ ~-1::C"'C '"
~ &J tll w ... '" .... ?:1 .... '" '" ~ ~ '" - ~ til '" ~ :E = co
... '" CD .... w 8 '" :g w .... W CD = ~ ~
... 0 0 w ... ... '" '" 0 .... :EQ...~ Ii-
'" ~ 8:: :;; .... .... '" 8J '" '" '" '" 81 '" ffi '" ~ '" '" '" ell ;;
~ ~ '" '" ~ 81 CD 8l '" '" '" i'5 " ~ '" ~ =
'" '" ,. '" w w '" '" ... '" w '" OJ =
'" ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z -<
... '" '" m .. '" 31 "l "l '" '" '" '" .. m j m 81 OJ '" '" "'~ ~ ~
'" ... ... w ... 0 '" '" ... ... '" ... '" '" '" '" !!I
~ n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :t~
'" ... .. w '" gj ,;: .. .. ... ... .. ~ '" :.l lli tJ: w gj iv i-J ='
'" OJ '" '" '" "' "' CD CD OJ '" ... w w
'" - - Z ."
'" &l ... III "1 ~ "1 ~ 8 ~ ill ~ 8i '" 8J ~ ~ ~ m
"l '" "l ~ '" '" w -<~
... 0 ... '" '" .... CD ... '" '"
'" ~ '"
- ell !!II>
OJ - '" - " CD '" "1 .... ~ a .... .... w ~ .. n =
.... ~ CD 31 w '" Ii'; CD ~ 0; 1jj '" '" '" OJ OJ ~
W 0 ... ... 0 ... .... '" '" '" '" s "
... w ::;.
n ."
CD ,. CD t:l w '" - ::: - - ~ ~ t:l w '" ... - ~ "'0 :;L..,
,. CD - W W W ... '" .... '" '" ... _ CD l>>.E.
iv w m w OJ iv - m .... ... .. "' w '" '" m m w '" m w l>>... :fico
~' c-,Q.
- -<=e "'."
- " w gs ~ til '" w w w w w ::: '" gs '" '0 w Ql t = CD
'" 8 ... " "1 " '" iJ<i ... .... OJ .... "1 '" ,. 3l~ Cl $ ~
'" '" w .... CD '" '" '" w w '" '" OJ W w n ."
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z ~.
..
'" '" '" .. '" '" .. Ii'; .. Ii'; Ii'; Ii'; .. '" '" '" '" Ii'; '" .. '" "'~ '" 11
'" '" '" CD '" '" CD CD CD '" '" '" '" '" CD '" ::;.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =:~ ~ i
... ... .. '" ... ,. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" Ii'; Ii; .. Ii'; '" Ii; '" Ii'; ..
'" CD '" '" CD '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" CD '" '" n
z
a ~ 0; ... ... ~ ~ - 0; - " ~ ,. w ~ ::: .. ",."
'" a '" .... '" w iJ<i '" ~ ~ '" l'3 .... '" ~ -. ..
'" ... '" 0 .... CD '" ,. ,. ... '" '" ... CD '" ~ ~
a ::: w ... ,;: .: 0; 0; ::: ~ ::: in g: w I'; '" 0; :t~ ii
'" ... CD ::: 81 .... CD CD w n !;
'" "' '" CD '" .... '" '" '" ... CD '" CD .... ... .... '" '"
'" ~ ~ 81 OJ OJ OJ CD '" '" "' 31 III III 8; ... gj ... ,;: ::: - ",ell ":1
'" '" '" ... '" '" '" '" '" w - ",<
'" :1 ',i
Sib'", II
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ... ... ... OJ OJ OJ '" '" '" '" ~ = .. Ii
c c c ;0 ;0 ;0 c c c c c 0 0 0 " " " c c c C :f.~Cll j]
Cloiii l:l.
= . :]
=,.... CI:I-. j
0 (") (") " " " " 0 (") (") (") (") 0 0 " " " " m " " S';;;1Il:-_3K !i
1M I i:al = _. ,.,
CD CD a.:=::I ~ '1
':" - , ~1
<eIlm tl
'" OJ OJ ~ ~ '" 8 '" i!l i!l i!l ~ 0; ~ ~ S ~ ~ i!l CD ClCOg.C1""C::::I:""C ;;1
l'3 '" .... g: i'5 f'l C<_o_.CD=(O y
0 0 0 0 OJ ~ .... 3 _. Cl ... Cll C CIl
0 0 CD~=' R""'R"
- ~... ::;l~CDC-r::l .....
co 0; ... '" OJ '" - in in '" "' - '" - ... CD ~ '" tl)lol:lI ~
,. OJ ... 0 0 '" 0 0 w .... 0 ~ ~~. 9-. _.: ,i
iv - ... .... iv '" W .. 0 ... ... ... m .. - m i-J 0 0 '" .... <mn ~
.. m _ CD co ';'" '"
-;l n 0. =
z :.
- ~ - - - '" '" - - ~ "
ffi '" '" ~ RJ ?:1 ... '~ ~ '8 "' '" '~ b '- W '.... .... "l '" i
'" '" CD '" '" III ffi :.: 81 0 '" 8 '"
w CD 0 en '" '" '" '" '" w .... ~ '" OJ W
- - - - - ~ ell
.. .
'" ~ en 8'J '" '" - '" '" III ~ '~ b 1::J '" '- '- OJ ... ~ ~
&l CD " OJ W '" ~ '" OJ ~ " '" ::0 :e
'" '" w '" ... CD '" ,. '" '" i
H
- 0 - 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 ~ 1
'" ::: w '" ffi .. ::: - " - m en m m en ~ '" ffi en t;J "
'" 0; w '" '" - w '" ... '" 0 ... '" w (") 11
,I
"T1
l:
-
l:
a;
n"ll
O::r-l
S,llllll
-./Il C'
~(D-
o ... CD
:l~1\)
/Ill\)'"
<o~
~:::.c:..
::r-
"ll
..
.2.
CD
!l
N
...
,
N
...
'.
CO
G"":)
-
~i~
n
1: _
~ ~
o
~ ~
~ ~
~
m
"
"
<
'"
~
,
'"
'"
OJ OJ OJ OJ ., ~ ., ., ~ z z z z z ;r ~ ~ " 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 '" r Q T " ~ g " "
" " " " ~ . ~ 0 g, " "
~ ~ 3 3 g ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ .
00 ~ :,: ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ U; U; U; 3 3 3 :l- 0 0 0 0: "' , , ~.
~ ~ ~ !1, !1, ~ ;r 5' 5' 5' 5' ~ ~ ~ --< ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ " ~ ~
" " ~ " . . . . . . . . . ~ 00 CD 00 ~ ^
~ " " i'i ~ ~ ~ ~ [ '" '" " '" '" '" '" " '" Q . ,,- ,,- il: .
~ 0 Ul Ul Ul . . . . . . . . . ~ . ~ ~ .
. . ~ Ul Ul Ul Ul " " " " i'i " " i'i i'i " " il' CD " " f
~ ~ ~ ~ " 0 0 0 0 0 CD il: " "
" " " " !lj !lj !lj 0 ~ . . ~ ~ . . . il: ~ ~
Ul !lj !lj !lj !lj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul
" "
:,: 00
~ ~
" '" "
.
~ ~ ~ OJ 9 " z " ~ m ~ z i< ~ , 3 ;r " ~ ~ Z r ., ~ ~ ., " m ., I 3 OJ ~ ., " Q 3 ! .,
~ ~ " " 0 . ~ 0 ~ . " " . ~ . ~ . " ~ 0
00 l: 0 - " 3 " ~ 3 3 U; ~ ^ ~ 3 , 3 ~ 0: 3
~ ~ :,: '" 00 c "' c . ~ " "' ~ ill " "
;U i 00 ~ - ~ - Z 0 ~ ~ Z . , ~ :> ~ . :l- ;r
00 0 ~ c !1, ~ g, m " m g, 0 --< :; ~ 5' CD . !1, " !1, ;U , ~ !1,
--< ,; ~ " ~ " " " CD CD i:i ~ ,; CD 1i .
~ iI ,; ~ ~ '" '0 ,; CD ~ '" Q if
--< . il' "' ~ m " ;:: ~ ,; g> '0 ~ il: il: ,,- i'i . m " a il' 'Ii . il'
^ . 00 I " . . " ;u ~ 0 . " "
~ . 2 " , ,; 0 r ~ " " m
'C CD 3 '" " ~ . CD ~ il' " . "
8 " , i:l 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 ,; ,; ,; ~ ~
0 I . ~ ,; il' . il: . "' " #1 ~ ,; il' a ,; ~ ,; ,; ~ CD 0 0-
0; 0 Q . '" ~ ~ " ;u ~ " ~ 0- ~ ,; ~ OJ ~ 0 ,; "l a .
~ 0- " ~ " 0- m Q 0- ~ It
~ " ~ ~ 0 00 CD '" . ~ 0 ~
8 , ~ ~ 0- 0- . ~ ~ 0- ~ . ~ 0 0- ~ ^ g, 0- 0- . CD ~ 0: Q 0- . g
. 3 ~ . ~ . "' 0-
~ , " "' " ~ OJ ^ '" ~ " z --< z . , :g- "' " 0- 0 "' . ~ t ,; ~
< !8 . , ~ " ,; ,; 5 . . ;u ~ i ~ " , "
0 oi , ~ ;u ;u ~ CD CD
'" --< ~ ~ CD , ~ ~ , 3 , " "
E " ;:: ill " m ~ :,: '" ~ a a :,: m Q ~
~ 0 , " ~ " ~ '!2 CD CD " CD . i3- 3
0 E 5 . J> 1l' 1i a ~ CD . . CD . ,,- " 0 ~
. ~ . ~ '" a OJ ~ ;;: - . a CD ~ 1i ,. ^
5 ~ . [ z 0 " 5 'J- a ~ . "
~ ~ " 0 " c, . . CD '" ~
. ~ . " ~ il' CD " " . .
, <; . - ~ g.
~ " ,,- ~ "
~ ~ . il' CD ~ ~
3 , a "
~ ~ ~
0 ;)
. 0
[ . . ~ iD 1II ~ ~ ~ ;j co III I::i '" ill '" tI! w '" I::i !:8 ~ B: II: ~ t:I ~ ~ u; III 0; 0; gj 5: ~
'< , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ..
, 0; . ~ w '" ~ 00 ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 w w ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
s ~ . 0;
, ~
~ ~
0 . ~ iD !'; ~ ~ llJ ~ ~ kl ~ '" ": I!! w Il: IS '" ~ I-,j tj ~ ~ u; "I ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ III ~ 01 llJ OJ ~ 8l ~ ~ ~ III llJ ~ ~ w ~ '"
, ~ ~ w 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ w ~ 0 ~ ~ 00 i
~ ~
~ . ~
0 . :,j iD gj ~ !'; ill - I::i '" w llJ ~ 1'5 gJ ~ B: ~ \:: ~ il; I::i !'; '" ~ ~ :g u; tti 0; 1!i ~ iD < '"
:e: . ~ ~ ~ m '" ~ ~ co ~ ~ ~ '"
~ ~ ~ '" ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ w 00 ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 00 w ~ 0 00 ~ ..
~ ~ !'; w ~ ~ iD 0 - ~ !'; '" w ~
" ~ ~ ~ w ~ w - ~ 00 ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ - 0 w ~ ~ - ~ w ~ 00 0 5:
0 ~ ~~ ffi .. :! b l1: '8; "' ~" ':g lli lli ~~ "l ~!:l ~ ~ '10 ~ ~~ '~ ill .~ m '" ~oo '0 lil "~ 0 ~
0 w ~ !'; 8 gj gj ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ w .
" 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
~ ..
3 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ J1 3
0 " m -< 0 w ~ ~ 0" - 0; ~ ~ 00 - ,~ 0 ~ ~ 0 - 0 0 ~ w w ~ - ~ w ~ 00 ~ ;5 .
it . '" ~~ ~ 'w '(3 'Ill '~ l€ "ill .. ~ lli "01 '~ c, ~~ '8 lti '~ ~ '" 'ffi "! ~~ '[, lS ill ~ lS ~ .. ~~ .
;;; , ~, ~ ~ ~ 0 :g ~ ~ 00 t>\ 0 ~ l'i ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
if t>\ W ~ ~ co 0 - t>\ t>\ ~ - < ~
. ~ ~ '= - w w w ~ 00 00 ~ 00 - - ~ 00 ~ ~ w ~ ~ m ~ ~ w w m 00 ~ ~
. 'ill "~ ~ "~ "0 ~~ ~~ "i:!l '" " '~ '~ .. 51 '8; .. '~ Yl "10 '~ ~;: ~ '~ lli '~ "~ '~ '2J '1!J ~!:l 'Ill ~ '" ~ ~~ ~ 0
I ~ ~ u; ~ ~ /; III ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 8 1'1 OJ
~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
m 0 ~ - - - 00 ::: ~ t;J ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ 0; " ~ w llJ - - ::: ~ ~ w ~ kl ~ w ..
0 ''': ~ ~ w 0 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ B~
~8 Rl 51 BI '~ 'm b ~ '~ ':2 kI "~ '" '~ I!i 3i ~ ~I' lli "' ~~ '8 'gj '~ ~'" '~ '" ~ '~ III Hi 'Ill ~~ g 1!i
:g w 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 m ~ ~ l'i w
m ~ ~ ~ 0 m 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m 0 0 0 ~ 0
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ t>\ t>\ - III t;J ~ 00 ~ w III ~ ill - ~ m 0 ~ i1I " ~ ,td III I::i :Q~
~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ w ~ 0 !3
'~ '~ ~ '~ '~ '!3 ~ ~ '8 ~~ "8 '~ ~ El ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ '13 ~ ~ ~~ '~ '8 ~ '~ El 8 ~ 8 ~ 8
8 8 -;
ijj ~ ~ III ~ 13 ~ IE ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ :g lJ! '" ~ iJ u; ill ~ ~ - &3 flj ~ ~ f~~"'C
ll! ;: 8i w III t c; w 8; '"
~ gJ t>\ t>\ '" "' ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 0 . "
0 w w ~ w ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 51- l!-
~ ~ '" "
~ ~ 8l ;: ~ ~ 8 ~ ill 8l 81 81 8l 8l 8l IB Ii1 ill Il: 111 ~ RI ~ <SO !:; lJ! ffi ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ '" "' III w ~ '" .
~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ w w w w ~ <SO ~ 00 ~ w 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ <SO ~ .
~ ..
0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 z i
~ ~ \:: <SO ~ ~ .. '" 00 ~ '" "l ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <SO j ~ ill ~ ~ ~ <SO ~ ~ 81 ~ ~ <SO ~ ~ m~ ~
~ ~ w w w ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ <SO ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
; 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 =:~
~ ~ .. .. w ~ m <SO ;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. m ~ '" ID III ~ &: w '" '" w .. m '" .. w w w ~ "
~ ~ <SO ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 00 ~ ~ 00 00 ~ <SO ~ ~ W ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ w w w
~ ~ ~ 8 ~ iD - ~ ~ ~ ~ <E ~ I!J ~ ~ ~ ~ z ..
Rl ill ~ ~ ~ ID 00 ill III ~ ~ ~ 1lI ~ Iii ~ ~ llJ II: .
~ w w w ~ '" w il; RI t ill ~ '" ~ -;"
~ ~ 00 ~ w ~ w ~ ~ w
m ~f
~ ~ u; ~ ;j t>\ iD iJ ~ '"
~ ~ is ~ ~ ~ 00 ffi 1lI ~ "' ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ w ~ ~ 0 . M ~
~ 0; m ~ I::i ffi IE II: kl ~ ~ ~ I' '" ~ :::
~ w ~ ~ ~ w ~ 0 ~ III 00 I' III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t>\ i; .,
~ ~ ~ ~
"
co ~ ill '" - iJ ~ iD 0 llJ ~ t;J III ~ "'C::l~
00 0 - ~ ~ ~ 0 ;: ~ 0 u; ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" <SO 0 t;J a
w ~ ~ 0 w .. - - w - ~ "' ~ w .. ~ - mila.
0 ~ - ~ a <SO 00 a " ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ "' 0 w . ':" 5!lm
. M 11
- - - - - ~ ~::IE ::-0
!': ": <SO ~- m ~o ~~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 13 ~ ili ~ ~ RI ~ "~ ffi ~ co '" ill t;i ili '" ~ ~ '~ lfj ; i Cell
~ '" W '" 8 ~ ~ ~ III 00 ill gJ &: 8 ~ ~ ~~ 5; ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ w - ~ 00 ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z ~.
m m <SO 0; 0; ~ ~ <SO 11; 11; 0; 0; 11; 0; 0; 11; ~ <SO m ~ Rl m ~ 11; ~ ~ Rl 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0; ~ m~ ., 11
~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
'" E
" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 ~~
~ 0; .. ~ ~ ~ ~ 0; <SO Rl <SO ~ ~ m <SO ~ 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 11; <SO 0; 11; 0; ~ 0; 11; 0; 0; 0; 0; ~ 0; ii'
00 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M
Z
'" tli ~ ~ ~ ~ '" t;J ~ ~ i'j ill ~ ~ w Ii1 8 ~ 0 m - ~ ~ ~ ~ .,..
:oj w 8 gJ ~ 0; llJ t>\ ~ llJ ~ 111 III t ;: ~ ill 0 t I::i 01 ~ -..
W <SO ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ m " "
::;+...
m w '" w ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ill ~ w ~ ~ \:! '" ill ~ \:: ~ gj ill "i w '" ~ ~ ~~ U
~ III ill 0 is 11; ill w ~ ~ ~ ill ffi 8J III 0; is III 81 M ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ '"
ffi "' :g IE 8l ~ ~ '1l ~ Il: 00 ~ ~ is ~ 8l 8l ffi 8; 8; 8; ~ I!i ~ ~ ~ ;: ID III ill '" m m '" - ::: 6",
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<
N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <SO ~ ~ <SO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5:; Q ~
c c c c '" " '" " c c c c c c 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 c c c c ~ ~ c c 0 0 0 c c ~. ~::
. '" ..
, ,
"'~
" " " " 0 0 0 0 0 0 co " " " " " " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m " CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Il ~ C. ~ s".::
5 III III s:: _.
n";;- a::, 3 ?
. ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" - ~ t>\ '" ~ ~ <lI)lD::
~ ~ ~ ~ i!i i!i i!i i!i ~ III III III ~ III III III i!i i!i III III E-~a=-=-
~ ~ ~ !'; ~ 0 !'; III is ~ t>\ 8 ili
0 0 0 :I . CI c::Z::
CD ~ :Ii =" g
, "
..
.-; ..
~ '" ~ ~ 13 ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ w '" td ~ m '" ~ <SO ~ ~ ~ u; iD "J iJ 00 co ~ m <SO 0 <SO ~ ~ fB "J So Q AI ~ III :
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (II = al..... a iJI'"
~ 00 '" - 00 - ~ <SO ~ - .. ~ 00 " 00 ~ " ~ w ~ " m m "' - 0 ~ w Co <SO W 0 ~ " ~ 00 <S-l"llDClC
o;a Bl g.=::;"
. '
~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - N ~ ~ - ~ - w - ~ ~ ~ z
~ ~ '~ ill ill 2i ~ ~ '1l ~ ~ '" t:I ~ jJ \[J w ~ b "00 '9 ~ 8 tJ '~ iil ill '~ .~ 00 N '&I lti ~ ~ t!l ~
ill is OJ "' t i1I '" ~ llJ "l ;: ~ w m
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- - ~ - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ,w - - ~ ~ '"
~ ~ "= ~ ~ m ~ '" ~ '" ~~ ~ '00 'w "' ~ ll! "0 ~ '~ !Ii ~ "l ~ "l ;: w !!l '0 '~ '" ~ ~ ~
~ 0 III kl "l ~ IE ~ ~ 8J 8l OJ is ~ :oj ;: III I-,j I-,j ~ ~ II: ~ III ,
w w ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ w ~ 00 :Ii
i
- ~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ~ - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 - ~ - 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 !; ill:
llJ 0 ~ III <SO m <SO ~ ~ '" ~ w ~ llJ ;: " 00 8J ~ 81 ~ ~ 8l '" '" '" ~ " 8l III ill " fii 8l :g ~ I
w ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ <SO 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n 1"
."
C
..
C
Cil
nDJ
o c
:I -.....1Il
0.-
-. 0. cr
cr.o-
o C lD
:I"N
l/l~~
"",N.
<o~
_..... U'I
"0)
:1"-
"V
..
.2.
lD
~
--
ex>
c-')
8C
The results of the intersection capacity analyses for Future Traffic Conditions With
Project are presented below in Tables 21-16 and Table 21-17. The detailed intersection
capacity analyses are provided in Appendix 21-2.
Table 21-16
Phase 1 (2011)
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Future Traffic Conditions With Project
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
No Improvements Improved
Worst Movement (Un- Worst Movement
Awrage Signalized Only) (Un-Signalized Only)
Level of
Service Delay Move- Delay Delay Move- Delay
Intersection Type (LOS) (Sec.) ment LOS (Sec.) LOS (Sec.) meot LOS (Sec.)
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Southbound OIl"Off Ramp S F 85.8 D 40.1
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp S B 19 B 16
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes BIIA:!. S E 74.1 D 46.1
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd. S D 41.7 0 35.1
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd. S F 235.3 B 18.4
Immokalee Rd. at Randall BI\d. S C 30.4 A 9
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd. S C 28.6 B 12.7
lmmokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U F 220.9 WB F 933.3 B 19.9
Immokalee Rd. (1st. St.) at SR 29 (Main St.) S E 57 D 39.8
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St. S B 18.4 B 18.4
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at lmmokalee Dr. S B 18.5 B 18.5
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Lake Trafford Rd. S F 80.9 C 29.7
Oil Well Rd. at Ewrglades 81\d. U F 133.1 NB F 624.5 B 14.2
Oil Welt Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U A 9.1 SB B 13.3 A 9.1 SB B 13.3
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U A 8.5 SB C 23.1 A 8.5 SB C 23.1
Oil Well Rd. at SR 29 U B 21.6 EB F 65.8 B 11.4 EBL E 45.5
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U F 255.6 EB F 536.9 C 23.2
Collier 81..u. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. S F 278.1 C 28.5
Collier BI\d. at Golden Gate Blw. S C 24.2 C 24.2
Collier Blw. at Pine Ridge Rd. S E 79.6 D 49.9
7/16/2004.-135532 Ver:02I-tv'f'ERRY
CAIN3
03786-013-OOQ-PDRI-28423
21-23
RC
-
.
Table 21-17
Buildout (2016)
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Future Traffic Conditions With Project
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
No Improvements Improved
Worst Movement (Un-
Average Signalized Only)
Level of
Service Delay Move~ Delay Delay
Intersection Type (LOS) (Sec.) ment LOS (Sec.) LOS (Sec.)
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramp S E 79 C 34.7
Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp S C 27.1 B 16.6
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes BII.(!. S F 120.9 D 52.8
Immokalee Rd at Collier BII.(!. S E 66.1 D 43
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson BII.(!. S F 345.7 C 31.9
Immokalee Rd. at Randall BII.(!. S E 66 A 9.1
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd. S E 55.9 B 17.6
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U F WB F C 26.2
Immokalee Rd. (1st. St.) at SR 29 (Main St.) S F 176.1 D 54.3
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St. S D 37.3 D 37.3
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Immokalee Dr. S C 26.9 C 26.9
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Lake Trafford Rd. S F 155.4 D 49.4
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades BII.(!. U F NB F B 19.6
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U F 369 SB F 833 B 16.1
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U F 146.4 SB F 410 C 21.4
Oil Well Rd. at SR 29 U F EB F B 15.9
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U F EB F D 35.9
Collier 611.(!. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. S F 459.1 D 40.9
Collier BII.(!. at Golden Gate BII.(!. S D 42.8 D 42.8
Collier 611.(!. at Pine Ridge Rd. S F 93.4 D 48.9
7/1612004- 135532 Ver. 02!- MPERRY
~,
03786-013-00O-PDRJ_28423
21-24
".8C
E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) and (C) above and
show, on separate maps or tables for each phase-end year, the DRI traffic on each
link of the then-existing network within the study area. Include peak-hour directional
trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the
project and local jurisdiction. For the year of buildout and at the end of each phase
estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI tripsltotal peak
hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips/existing peak
hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the
study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for
the regionally significant roads.
Tables 21-14 and Table 21-15 summarize the Project's peak hour traffic on roadway
segments in the study area for Phase 1 (2011) and Buildout (2016), respectively. Also
included in these tables is the Project's traffic as a percent of the maximum roadway
service volume at the adopted level of service standard.
As noted previously, the Project traffic on roadway segments was estimated using select
zone analysis of the FSUTMS travel model assignments with the Project for both 2011
and 2016.
F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (D) and (E) above, what modifications
in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each
phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service
standards? Identify which of the above improvements are required by traffic not
associated with the DRI at the end of each phase. For those improvements which
will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where
applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g.,
signalization, one-way pairs, ridesharing, etc.) that will be used and any other
measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due
to a large number of truck movements.
Improvements
According to the DCAlDRI Transportation Uniform Standard Rule (9J-2.045), a Project is
found to have a significant (and adverse) impact on a State or regionally significant
roadway if it is found to meet both of the following criteria: (1) the Project will utilize 5
percent or more of the maximum peak hour service volume at the adopted level of
service standard; and (2) the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted level of
service standard.
A review of Tables 21-14 and 21-15 indicate several roadway segments that will be
significantly and adversely impacted by the Project at the end of Phase 1 (2011) and at
Buildout (2016). These roadway segments will eventually need to be improved (or
alternative routes provided) to accommodate general growth in the area. These
improvements are included in Tables 21-18 and 21-19
7/1612004--135532 Ver:02!-tJPERRY
CA"J
03786-013-QOO-PDRl-28423
21-25
8e
Table 21-18
Phase 1 (2011)
Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements
E+C
Config- Improve-
Road Limits uration men!
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 2U 2t040
N. 151h SI. (SR 29) Main SI. to Immokalee Dr. 2U 2t040
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr. 10 lake Trafford Rd. 2U 21040
N. 151h SI. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd. 10 SR 29 A North 2U 21040
N. 151h SI. (SR 29) 29A North to SR 82 2U 21040
SR29 CR 846 10 Oil Well Rd. 2U 21040
SR82 SR 29 10 Hendry County Line 2U 2t040
E+C
Config- Improve-
Road Limits uration ment
Collier Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 40 40 to 60
1-75 Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. 4F 4F to 6F
Immokalee Road Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 2U 2 to 40
Immokalee Road Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd. 2U 2 t04D
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 2U 2t04D
Main SI. (SR 29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 40 4D to 6D
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Main SI. to Immokalee Dr. 2U 2 t04D
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr. to Lake Trafford Rd. 2U 2 t04D
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 2U 2 t04D
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) 29A North to SR 82 2U 2104D
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 2U 2 t04D
SR29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 2U 2t040
SR 82 SR 29 to Hendry County Line 2U 2t04D
Table 21-19
Buildout (2016)
Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements
1/16/2004-13553<' Var:02!-t.PERRY
~-
03786-{)13-000-PDRI.28423
21-26
The significant and adverse impact on the segment of '-75 from Immokalee Road to
Bonita Beach Road is due in part to the use of the LOS "C" standard, when considering
that the commitment from the State to improve 1-75 is not until 2008. The planned
widening to at least six lanes will provide sufficient service volume to eliminate the
deficiency, even at LOS'C".
Be
A number of intersection improvements will be needed to support the Project and
general growth in the area through 2016.
Recommended intersection improvements for Phase 1 (2011) and Buildout (2016) are
summarized below in Table 21-20 and Table 21-21 respectively.
711612004-135532 Ve.-,02!-IIiIPERRY
~.,
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
21-27
III
-
C
<I)
E
<I)
>
o
L-
a.
E
~-
o....c
Nb.2
'N-
...._U
N <I)
<I).... III
_<I)L-
.QIIl<l)
.,.,-
I-.c-=
0.."
<I)
"
C
<I)
E
E
o
u
<I)
a::
8e
h t i i ! f'"!i ~. "' i
~, oil "'
Q ---i ~
i
i~ '" ",' u! w
" !
1I ~
~E ~ I !Ill m; ~
Is'" i '" i
J i (I), wi w
" ,
. ~ .., lDi ~! "
i u ~ 0 ~ ~, 0 ~ O'l: '" ~ ~. l.i1! ~ Ni "' '" !D
~ 1! ~ 0 ~ <ri ~; en ~ oj] III oj "'! Pl, ;! ail co: ~ fl! '" ..; !D
" ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~
~ ;
! '" 0: 1IJ! <( CD! OJ! '" <;:(i <( 0;
f " 0 '" 0 '" 0 1IJ U 1IJ U U 0
~ ;
. i ~i , ; i , i !
~ ..c; ; ;
>- 5' ;
<0 1-; ,
~ w mi >-
.. c 2'1 OJ) <0
i . ...J; ~! i ! '"
i a lDi +i , ~
.s ';, j 1-: ~i ~ ~ 01>' OJ! +
~ j j . [Il! lDi J ~ ~ J ~ Nj . . >-
0; zj =j <0
~ <0 c, c wi gj c c Z
W a ~, a a
t)i z +r ~! z z ~
~ . ~; +! oo[ + iJii +
c ..
.!; 0 -gi ~i ; ~
<0
. oo' m, Z
!D o::! .~ , "
:ii Wi lZli ; ;
~ ! zi ,
u
! ~; ; , !
+ ; , ,
;
} if ! .....; ~, ~ qi >-- i "'
to' tcii fB N ; ~
; ~ !!'. ~ ~. en! ! !
,
. I!l ,
E 0: OJ w <j <0 , U
j ~ !
0: 0:::, , i i . . .
1IJ ~i ; , ! , 0: 0: "'
>-' 1-: ~ ; , m ~ m
i I lIP ~! +, to , , ~ z >-
~ ~! >- 1-; U) i , ! . ~ ~ m
'" . . 00
. .-, ~, ~ lDi .; ., QlI . ., Ql; aJ; .. ., .' >- N . .
i c + + ~I + 5i .:::j ~l c l:! c' \::; .ei 6i .:::! m >- >- C c
a ~i a 0' a' a. a. ~! ~ m m . a a
Z >- >- '" >- zi z z' z; Zi Z' Zf " Z ~ Z Z
~ lDi lIJ' + <0 ! . N N m
0. .!; Wi wi >- z , i , . . 00
~ " +! 1IJ H '" , ! ~ ~ ~ ~
1IJ, , ; , m
~ W wi i , , ~ ~ m
'" ~i , ! :"
i i , i .
~~ ~ ! ! I f')! ll)i ~ , , CO! CYl;
U i ffij ..ji ~, ~,
1! ~ , [Ji rrl' ~, wii
" Ni (0, LOt
; ;
h '" t ! I ; ; : ~i ,
" I..L.! !Il! ,,' l..L..i ll.-!
i ~ ; , ; ; ! ! ! -;;;
..~ ~ : ! , , , , u
I 'If ~i , ; <0' lIJi mi mf m]
~ ; , "5
~ i , , Z, IZq 00: Wi Wi
" , , , 0:
.!; 001 ~ en! , , (0; u
t ~ 0; ~ ~ "<:T; ~ OF ~i "" lY!: ~. 0:0; ~ '" ~ .
a , cri: ..; "' 01 oj ol rij a::ii lrii 0; f8i l.[); t2! oj ~ "
"" :;; ~ N' mi wi 0i! >-- !D
Z 2 " !!'. (OJ ~ '" fTli '" 0.l1 ......i lDi "" '" ~ E
; ; E
! .. B , , ; a
~ , , "
I ! LL] III: W 0 ~ U " lI...' wi Ill: lIJ' l..L..! lL..! '" <( III: !.J..., ~ " W .
d , , ! , c
~ .
, ! 0:
. wi (1)[ ,,' f.
~ en! wi U) U) U) U) ~i 00: en: U) =>i ::>[ =>i :)[ U) U) U) c
, I I , ~
0
'" '" , , ; "
Ej E: , , , i ~
lIIi . , - ;
O::i 0: u1: ; ; "
1#=; 1#=1 0
0; 0: , .!:; '" .' E
"2:: -, <lIi ...;' 0::; g[ ,g
0; c, ~ CO' -vi
0: , ; ~: 01>: ~; '"
u' =, , -Oi i'1: . 0: ':i:
c, 01>, U
0' c 0::, ! Iii .' c; .' ili! ~ '" >
0: ]! -0' oo! 0::; .=' u l!! u' u '" "~
= ~, = '" '" ~ '" 0::: ., . 1IJ '"
'" "" "", "<'ii: (I}; 0 . E: u
B '5: ..c:' "" > m: 0: 01>; -' -, E' ..::.:0' 1IJ 1;: "~: . . '"
t::: 1IJ 15 1IJ ::::(: .' (I); .' . Wi 1IJ 1;; .
~ ~! 0: . ~ Iii ~ ::i "Ei Ei --.Jj .' .' ~; ~; .g "
Z, . jj -v, ~ ~: -0, "iiji ~: .e '" .
ill I.[l, lDi ~ !!! c. (.I): ~' . E
. 8 i: <lI' z! Pl1 E'>i ~: nj !D <(I ~ :ii '" ~
.Ii ~: ~' 0 O::i is u: tiii 16\ 6)i ~, E. '" ~j u m
N' ~I <lIi 0: c " c !'
<ii' 16, 1;; 1;; 161 . nI' 8 mf 0:: .
1;; 0::] W <<(i 0' U) -0: > '" 0:
-0; -0, u u = -01 '" =, -0: N: ~ ~ iiji i{ 16: 1;; 0::, 1;; 1;; 1;; E
0::' 0::: 0: 0: 0: 0:. '" 0:; 0:' 0::1 u1' -0: "~i =
~; .' . ~ . 01>! ~ m' O1>i ~ (15: 0:] -0, '" '" .,; .,; E
a:! 0::1 '" . > > "
. . . 01>: -*; ~! ..c:i .,
Iii: ~i .. .. ::: Iii; .. t - ::::(i 15 15 1IJ E
~, ~ ~ ~, ~ ..:><i -:.:, ti5i E! ~I m: ~i 0; oj . 1) ~
0; 0 a E 0; a E! E; c, ~ ';! ~ .
Ei E: E E Ei E m E!
"n;: ~. ~ <II; " " "
Ei Ei E E E E; E Ei E: ~: LLi i.i:! is 6i 0' is V " u " a:
00
N
,
~
N
>
<<
<<
w
"
, "
~ ~
.
> <<
~ l?
q
;; -
~"~
~~2
III
-
c
CD
E
~
~
a.
E
~-
CO
........ C
NO.S!
'''1_
....~<J
"I_CD
CD ::1 III
-0'"
..Q:5!S
ca._ c
1-::1-
1D't:I
Gl
't:I
C
Gl
E
E
o
<J
Gl
a::
o
;;
I
"
1;
..
C
o
Ii
"
"
'"
~
o
i
i
"
1;
il
~
E
..
o
<l:
'"
~
o
;;
"
E
~
f
:l!
!l
~~
~i
h
U.9
~'"
~
"
il'
!
~.
d
'1;"-
'i!'~ Ul
!liCDg
...",-
~.
- ~
~~
'"
o
...
i
E
~
a
1;
~...,
2l~
is
...
;;
.
E
~
"
1;
il'u
~S;
'"
o
...
';;
h
...,
~
'"
ro! oi
~! ~i
,
~~ """': UJ
;;:ji m ~
'"
<ri
(j
0: 0;
,
ut q:
m
f-
m
w
c
.
o
S
~
m
w
.
C
o
2,
: ~i
; ~1
....Ji
~J
....i m!
,;::i
0;
Z!
---Ii
! mi
~ ~ g
~i z z
+!
cd!
Wi
-0:
ci
(lli
a:i
(0;
2i
~,
+
,
....-i
.
~
C
.
~
(j
+
en! 01
tB! ~j
,
(I'l!
r--,:i
CYlI
wi 0: lLi oc(: [D
! i ! !
,
.
C
o
Z
t-'
~:
:
,
OJ -i mi .....i ~;,' a! CTl
ai',: ......, or (O! .., w',' '"
"," N' ''''::''~' .^
......i ,~: .....: ....... (T')i lDj ...,
; i i
,
~ ;
u..! wI
,
lL! wi w
"
~
! , i
wi wi (f); (1'): en! wi (I)
c
,~
tl
.
e
"
l::
01
Ei
.;
ct::
Q::::!
12:
c;
0'
"'0:
C'
6:
~,
:s!
o.
en!
~i
;;
"'0' <:i; <:i
ct:: 0::: a:
Q)' 0); Q)
Q)" ~; IV
~i ~j ~
o' oj 0
E: E E
Ej Ei E
oj
E;
~i
It::!
0:
'"
OJ
-or
,:::!
~,
~J jj
51 ~
Zi Q)
~
.
o
!
-0; -gi -g: -0
2':; mi ai' ct:
lD: c:i
Oi! oj
0: ~1..
Oi :>
(ii, Qj
'l": ~
~: (5
I,C)!
"i
....!..!
m! m! '1;;: ~
-0' -OJ
cr.! Ct:;
(l); Q)f
1lI; <>>[
:~n ~i
O[ O[
Ei Ei
Ej EI
mj Ai
"'tJi "'0
"', '"
a:>i Ql
J" .
m; (ij
..:.::! ..:.::
0: 0
E' E
Ei E
! !
Ni ('1; (Y')
wi "<ii ,.....:
Nj Lnj (Tl
,
m
oi
oi 0
j
j
ffii
~,
~!
mr
wj
+i
1-1 +!
m ....Ji
zl (D;
Wi
---Ii
OJ!
5'
~,
....-! (D
m! !::::
~! ~! ~
~i ~! ~
lL..1
,
~i
,
i tri! :21 ~
~! (Y")! N
!
!
i
lL..i lL..!
,
,
; :
::>i Wi
~
Of
i CI
.
e
~!
ro!
~I
c..i
E!
81
<::Ii
0:::
Q)!
Q)!
CU'
..::.:::
0;
E'
EI
<::I: ?1~
~1 ffi!
OJ: '--'!
~! or
E: c!
E".' "iii:
:>,
I j
oj c
UJi CJ:
I
i
(i5" 05! -0;-0
..c ..c! 0::) 0::
E c: w; Qj.
~" ~i ~: ~
~: iZl 6i 6
(J): "<t
~l ~
0: 0
; i
c::l~ OJ' 0:
.
'"
m
~
-l;
OJ:
OJ! ~!
~i +
c! w;
c:i ~:
U5i g!:
oj
; en:
,
+
f-
m
UJ
+
f-
m
z
~
+
.
C
o
Z
.'. j
c,
~J
'-'--I '-'--
co! IJJ
Z! (f)
"<t!
Lrii
l.C)!
LL' LL...' LL...
,
(I)! ::>i ::>
; ;
LC!!....., "'<t'
en! ~) N!
! !
'"
'"
iID
[0
'Ill
,
~
ID
!~
+
f-~
mID
w; Zw
~! + +
c! --.J <-
oj 1JJ[i)
U)i Z (I)
++
i _~
if;
c
~
Uj
~:
~I
!
N'
~i
LL...!
ffi!
"<ti
tri;
"<tj
LL...!
::>i
~r
(Q;
~1
01
E'
ro!
OJ
(;!
-0:
o::!
-!
wi
~.
6j
cr>
'"
m
m
C
o
Z
"-
m
w
"-
:0
ro;
iij:
:>'
(I):
<:i
rei
-ci
'"
w
'iii:
(I):
= ::::,ci
~ o.f
- l~'
o 0:
cr>
N
'"
UJ
;;
-ci
'"
en:
:lli
oi
~
m
z:
+
.
~!
.;
c'
'"
Uj
-'
~ .In
N-'W
+ ~~
"'~...
'" '"
w. W
Wi..... 0::......
ci + ID +
~;5;S:[[
"L.U:- ~
:-~:
a::~~
w. z
~ N
.
"-,
lD:
Wi
cr>
"'
..,
"-I
"-
=
UJ
.'
u
~i
"E!
wi
~
'"
~
u
.
.
m
'E
.
~
C
.
>
;;
-ci
>
(jj
~
o
(j
.
C
o
Z
.
~ i
o i
8e
cr>
o
~
'" cr>
<:; '!iI
o
o 0
,
f-
ID
UJ
+
f-
m
Z
. ~
C +
o ~
Z m
Z
+
f-
m
W
+
. .
C C
o 0
Z Z
'" ~
IN cr:i
... cr>
,
o "-
UJ UJ
-ci
"'
ID -ci
. '"
~ ~
"'
~
.
E
E
~ ~ ~
8 8 Ii:
~ :g
(jj m
~" ."
0>
N
,
~
N
0;
13
m
o
0:
~
~
E
E
~
w
c
.
Q
~
C
o
o
(j
~
w
.
,
o ~
~ Q:
12 ~
" ~
~ '
~.~
!::!i:;
'00
Traffic Mitiaation
8e
The Town of Ave Maria will mitigate its traffic impacts through the payment of road
impact fees and the construction of site-related improvements. Road impact fees have
been estimated at approximately $87.6 million through buildout. Collier County requires
that 50% of road impact fees be paid at the time of approval of a site development plan
or subdivision master plan, and the remainder paid at the time of issuance of a building
permit (or within three years if no building permit has been issued). Therefore, Collier
County has these funds available significantly in advance of the time when actual
. impacts occur.
In addition to the payment of road impact fees, the applicant has also committed to
provide road right-of-way adjacent to the applicant's holdings along Oil Well Road
(approximately 3 miles) and Camp Keais Road (approximately 5 miles). Sufficient right-
of-way will be provided to accommodate the future 6-laning of both highways. Although
the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance provides for the granting of road
impact fee credits for such donation, the applicant has agreed to provide such right-of-
way without credit to road impact fees.
The Project will construct site-related improvements at The Town of Ave Maria's access
pOints onto Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road. They include the following.
. Oil Well Road - Westbound Left-turn Lane
. Oil Well Road - Eastbound Right-turn Lane
. Camp Keais Road - Northbound Left-turn Lane
. Camp Keais Road - Southbound Right-turn Lane
Additional site-related improvements at secondary access points will be provided
consistent with County standards.
The applicant will also be responsible for a proportionate share of any traffic signals that
may be warranted in the future.
G. Identify the anticipated number and general location of access points for driveways,
median openings and roadways necessary to accommodate the proposed
development. Describe how the applicant's access plan will minimize the impacts of
the proposed development and preserve or enhance traffic flow on the existing and
proposed transportation system. This information will assist the applicant and
governmental agencies in reaching conceptual agreement regarding the anticipated
access points. While the ADA may constitute a conceptual review for access points,
it is not a permit application and, therefore, the applicant is not required to include
specific design requirements (geometry) until the time of permit application.
The Project's access management plan will minimize the impacts of the Project on the
adjacent roadways by limiting access to one primary access point on Oil Well Road (a
secondary access connection may be appropriate) and two planned access connections
to Camp Keais Road. These are shown on the Master Plan for the Project (Map H).
The access connections will meet proper spacing guidelines and are intended to be full
median openings when Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road are multi-Ianed.
7/1fl1200J.-135532 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
-
037/l6.013-()()G. ~ 0
21- 30
8e
,,..,.~
H. If applicable, describe how the project will complement the protection of existing, or
development of proposed, transportation corridors designated by local governments
in their comprehensive plans. In addition, identify what commitments will be made
to protect the designated corridors such as interlocal agreements, right-of-way
dedication, building set-backs, etc.
The Metropolitan Planning Organization, on June 11, 2004, amended the MPO's Long-
Range 2025 Financially Feasible Plan to incorporate both Oil Well Road and Camp
Keais Road. The applicant has committed to protecting that portion of the right-of-way
within the corridor adjacent to the applicant's holdings along Oil Well Road
(approximately 3 miles) and Camp Keais Road (approximately 5 miles). Sufficient right-
of-way will be protected to accommodate the future 6-laning of both highways. The
applicant has agreed to provide such right-of-way to the County without credit to road
impact fees.
I. What provisions, including but not limited to sidewalks, bicycle paths, internal
shuttles, ridesharing and public transit, will be made for the movement of people by
means other than private automobile? Refer to internal design, site planning,
parking provisions, location, etc.
With the Ave Maria University and the Town Center/Core as the foundation, The Town of
Ave Maria is being planned and designed to be a truly "walkable community". Inherent
in the design concepts of The Town of Ave Maria is the commitment to promoting
efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within the development. All elements of
design, from the land use design and master plan layout, to the street cross section
designs; every aspect of Ave Maria is tailored to the pedestrian. Even the hierarchy of
street design is based upon the pedestrian as the primary user of the street system.
Sidewalks invite the resident or visitor to walk from place to place along narrow,
landscaped streets, some with on-street parking and streetscaping amenities that will
both encourage and comfort the users. The typical university landscape, commonly
found as a bicycle/pedestrian-friendly environment, will be enhanced at Ave Maria
University by the compact grid-based design philosophy incorporated into a pre-planned
campus environ. A network of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure has been designed
to encourage maximum utilization in and between Town and University. Certain design
features in the University go so far as to prohibit specific travel paths by auto use while
encouraging pedestrian/bicycling-only travel. Walking/biking pathways throughout the
university and town are intended to "connect" one with the other.
While at a minimum, the Applicant will comply with applicable bicycle and pedestrian
regulations in the Collier County Land Development Code, in addition, the University,
commercial and recreational facilities provided within The Town of Ave Maria will
promote independence from the private automobile and discourage external trip making.
The Town Centers will provide retail and service establishments on site to encourage
bicycle and pedestrian travel within the community and to capture those convenience
type trips that would otherwise be making vehicle trips on Oil Well Road, Camp Keais
Road and Immokalee Road.
From SWFRPC Supplemental Questions and Clarification:
Prior to answering DRI Question 21, a meeting with review agencies should be held to
discuss the applicant's assumptions and proposed methodology. A letter summarizing
711612004- 135532 Va!: 011- MPERRY
~~
03766-013-OOQ.--O
21- 31
8e
these assumptions and the proposed methodology for answering question 21, must be
provided to review agencies at least one week prior to this meeting. All parts of Question
21 and the following Supplemental Questions should be answered by the applicant unless
specifically excluded at the DRI Preapplicant Meeting.
A. The initial applicant analysis should be based on the existing plus committed (E+C)
road network. Any improvements required in addition to the E+C network should be
addressed in answer to DRI Question 21.F.
Please refer to response to Question 21.A and Question 21.F.
B. The peak hour and daily analysis should be based on annual average conditions and
any traffic counts should be appropriately adjusted to reflect these conditions.
Please refer to response to Question 21.A and Question 21.D.
C. Please provide a table showing the phased breakdown of the DRlland uses, the trip
generation rates, and the cumulative trips employed in the transportation analysis.
The applicant's analysis should assume 100 percent occupancy of all DRlland uses.
Please refer to response to Question 21.B and Question 21.C.
D. Passerby capture should not be used when a regional systems model is used.
When a regional systems model is not used, passerby capture should not exceed
10% of adjacent roadway traffic and 25% of project external trip potential.
No additional "pass-by capture", beyond that provided by the FSUTMS model was
incorporated into the analysis.
E.1. Indicate the peak hour trips and ADT's by phase for major internal DRI roads.
The only "major" internal DRI roadways are the Entrance Roads. Table 21-22 indicates
the ADT and peak hour peak directional volumes for the two entrance roads by phase.
Table 21-22
Entrance Roads Daily and Peak Hour Peak Direction Volumes
Peak Hour Peak Hour
FSUTMS Peak FSUTMS Peak
Entrance Road ADT ITE ADT Direction ADT ITE ADT Direction
From Oil Well Road 16,980 17,223 484 28,070 28,245 783
r~ ~ -~ ~~ -
From Camp Keais Road 26,510 26,890 756 47,770 48,067 1333
Total 43,490 44,113 1,240 75,840 76,312 2,116
1/1612004-135532 Ver: 011. MPERRY
-,
03786-013-000--0
21- 32
8e
E.2. Describe fully the methodology used to distribute and assign traffic to the highway
network.
Please refer to response to Question 21.D and Question 21.E.
F.1. At a minimum, a 1985 HCM operational analysis should be performed for
significantly impacted intersections during the first five years. A planning analysis
of impacted intersections should be performed for phases beyond five years and
intersections projected to be near capacity or over capacity should be indicated.
The use of the Critical Movements Analysis in Circular 212 is not acceptable. The
applicant should provide worksheets showing existing conditions, and projected
conditions without the DRI and with DRI traffic, indicating what improvements will be
necessary.
Please refer to response to Question 21.D and Question 21.F.
F.2. The standard used to determine regional significance of DRI impacts is 5% of daily
level of service "C" capacity for road segments, 5% of peak hour LOS C for rural
intersections, and 5% of peak hour LOS D for urban intersections.
Please refer to response to Question 21.D and Question 21.F.
F.3. Please indicate whether the planned improvements or new facilities made necessary
in whole or in part, as a result of this project, have an existing funding source.
Please refer to response to Question 21.F.
F .4. Please indicate, for those improvements which will be required due to the DRI and
which are not currently funded in a recognized transportation planning program, to
what extent the applicant will commit to fund the needed improvements.
Please refer to Question 21.F.
G. If a bikeway system is proposed, please indicate its route.
Please refer to response to Question 21.
111612004-135532 Ver: 01!- t.f>ERRY
-
03786-013-000--0
21- 33
~8C
PART V. Human Resource Impacts
QUESTION 24 - HOUSING
A.1. If the proposed development contains residential development, provide the following
information on Table 1 for each phase of the development.
Table 24.A-1
Dwelling Units within the Community
Estimated Number of
Tenancy and Type Housing Cost Dwelling Units
(median)
Owner Occupied
Single-Family $320,000 Phase 1 - 3,980
(Range $195,000 to $500,000) Phase 2 - 2,896
Owner Occupied
Multi-Family $215,000 Phase 1- 1,730
Phase 2 - 1,394
(Ranae $125,000 to $300,000)
Rental
Multi-Family Phase 1 - 300
One Bedroom $650 - $850/mo. Phase 2 - 700
Two Bedroom $850 - $1, 100/mo
Three Bedroom $1,100 - $1,400/mo
Total 11,000 units
A.2. What number and percent of lots will be sold without constructed dwelling units?
What is the extent of improvements to be made on these lots prior to sale?
It is anticipated that the majority of land will be sold by the applicant to individual developers
without dwelling units constructed on the individual lots. Prior to the sale of a single-family
home site to a residential user, irnprovements required by the State and Collier County will
be in place for that building phase. These improvements generally include the necessary
infrastructure and access.
A.3. What will be the target market for the residential development (break down by
number, percent and type the number of dwelling units to be marketed for retirees,
families, etc.) What portion will be marketed as second or vacation homes?
The Town of Ave Maria will contain a variety of housing opportunities including single-
family, condominiums, villas and multi-family dwelling units. The single-family and multi-
family market conditions will determine this breakdown, but it is anticipated that the target
market will be as described in Table 24.A-2 below. It is estimated that as many as 30% of
the single-family units, and as many as 30% of the multifamily units, may be second or
vacation homes.
7/2312004- 135535 Ve" 01!_ MPERRY
,~,
03786-013-0()(). PORI. 28423
24-1
se
Table 24.A-2
Target Market
Type of Resident Number Percent
Empty Nesters/Retirees (1) 3,850 35%
Families (2) 5,500 50%
Singles (3) 1,650 15%
Total 11,000 100%
(1) "Empty nesters" are typically full-time working individuals whose
children are no longer living with them. "Retirees" are typically not working
individuals, and typically do not have children living with them.
(2) "Families" have school-age children, and typically work full time.
(3) "Singles" are unmarried persons.
B. Indicate and discuss the availability or projected availability of adequate housing
and employment opportunities reasonably accessible to the development site.
Housing opportunities should be described in terms of type, tenure, and cost range
and location within the following circumscribed areas: adjacent, two miles, five
miles, ten miles, and within the local jurisdiction or county. Employment
opportunities should be described in terms of two digit SIC code numbers located
within the local jurisdiction with estimated distances or transit times to the
development site.
At the pre-application conference on May 19, 2004, Regional Planning Council staff and the
applicant agreed that the applicant would not conduct the ECFRPC methodology for the
project.
The Town of Ave Maria is planned to provide a wide range of housing and employment
opportunities for its residents within the Town. In the vicinity of the Town, the communities
of Imrnokalee, Orangetree, and Golden Gate Estates provide a wide range of housing
options, and Immokalee also provides employment options. Each of these communities is
within a ten-rnile/twenty-minute commute of the Town and also recognized as providing a
substantial portion of the work force housing supply in Collier County, as land and home
prices are significantly lower than those in the coastal communities of Naples and Marco
Island.
Ave Maria University is expected to be the prirnary source of job creation in the Town in the
early years of its growth. As the Town and University grow, customary support services
and facilities will be established to support the Town and University's population base. The
allocations of retail, service, office and other nonresidential uses planned within the Town
have been carefully sized to reflect the anticipated needs of the Town's residents, and also
meet all the applicable guidance of Collier County's Growth Management Plan/Rural Land
Stewardship Overlay.
7/23J2004- 135535 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
~,
03786-013-OClO-PDRI.28423
24-2
'*"8 c
The planning for the Town has taken into consideration its relatively remote location from
existing urban areas, and the anticipated demand for housing to support the faculty, staff,
and administrative employees of Ave Maria University. As undergraduate students are
required to live on campus, dormitories satisfy their housing needs. Graduate students will
have the option of living on-campus or off-campus in apartments, condominiums, single-
family homes, or guest homes. Faculty and staff will be able to select from a full range of
housing options throughout the Town, depending on family size and lifestyle preferences.
The same holds true for employees of other businesses that will be established in the
Town. Because of the reasonable home pricing expected in the Town, we anticipate an
adequate supply of housing for the majority of people choosing to live in the Town. We also
recognize that many of the jobs that will be created, particularly in the service sector, will be
considered to be low-income jobs.
Fortunately, the existing work force in Immokalee, Orangetree, and Golden Gate Estates
are available to fill many of these jobs, and the location of the Town is in much closer
proximity than existing job opportunities in the coastal region. Some of these service
sector, low income jobs will also be filled by part-time university student employees.
Historically, up to 40% of students are expected to work on a part-time basis, both on and
off campus. Recent studies also indicate that many people retired from full time
occupations will seek part time employment in the service industries.
Notwithstanding the existing supplies of work force housing in the vicinity, and the expected
expansion of such facilities over time as demand for such housing is created by the town
and university, the applicant is committed to working with affordable work force housing
providers and developers in the area to ensure that the work force housing supply is
increased over time. There are a range of options currently being explored and the
applicant is committed to the provision of work force housing both on-site and in the
neighboring Immokalee area. Options include both for sale and rental product on-site at
work force market rates; while off-site options include assisting not-for-profit entities with
site acquisition and possible alliances with for-profit work force housing providers in the
area.
There rnay be other possible solutions to this issue that are currently unknown, but the
Applicant agreed at the DRI pre-application meeting to work with the County and Regional
Staff to find suitable affordable housing solutions in the area. The SWFRPC Staff did
request that the applicant not conduct the typical ECFRPC methodology for the Town of
Ave Maria DRI.
c. If displacement or relocation of existing residents will occur due to the proposed
development, identify the number of people that will be affected, any special needs
of these people, and any provisions for addressing the effects of the relocation or
displacement of these people, particularly in regards to their ability to find suitable
replacement housing.
There are no existing permanent residents on the site.
7/2JJ2004. 135&35 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,~,
03786-013-000-PDRI.26423
24-3
8e
QUESTION 25 - POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
A. If police/fire services, facilities or sites will be dedicated or otherwise provided on-
site, describe them, specify any conditions of dedication and locate on Map H.
The Immokalee Fire Department will provide fire service and police protection will be
provided by the Collier County Sheriff's Office. Discussions have been held with the
Immokalee Fire Department, Collier County EMS, the Collier County Fire Code Official, and
the Collier County Sheriff's Office to obtain their input on the initial and permanent needs of
each organization to service the proposed development. During the initial stages of the
developrnent of Ave Maria, temporary facilities will be provided on-site for police and fire
protection personnel and equipment so that these services are available immediately.
Permanent facilities will be provided and are proposed for location in one of the community
facility (CF) districts indicated on Map H.
The closest existing fire station to the site is located in Immokalee at 502 New Market
Road. The travel distance to the site from the Immokalee Fire Department is approximately
8.5 miles via Immokalee Road and Camp Keais Road. The nearest sheriff's and EMS
substation is located in Immokalee at 112 South 1st Street. The travel distance to the site
from the existing sheriff's and EMS substation is approximately 8.0 miles via Immokalee
Road and Camp Keais Road.
AMU plans to provide on-campus security 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Based upon
the anticipated enrollment, the ratio of student to security personnel will be
approximately 1 :650 which is in keeping with other institutions in Florida.
Security Officers will be unarmed unless a contract is entered into with the Collier
County Sheriff's Department to provide on-campus security. AMU is currently discussing
options with the Sheriff's Department. If AMU establishes an in-house security staff or
contracts with a licensed security service, their personnel will be unarmed.
All students, faculty, and staff will be oriented to call 911 in the event of an emergency.
They will be further instructed to make a second call to the security office which will be
required to respond to the incident for a fOllOW-Up investigation. The security staff will be
the first called on non-emergency incidents. This policy ensures that the Collier County
Sheriff's Office central dispatch center does not get secondhand information and will
help avoid the chance of error. The ability of the campus security dispatcher to assess
the original call ensures that the appropriate first responders are dispatched. Ave Maria
University intends to rely heavily upon student life staff to impose strict adherence to
University Policies applicable to student conduct.
AMU's intentions are to utilize foot and bicycle patrols on campus, augmented by
vehicles when required.
(23612004.135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~
03786-01:}'-()()()"PDRI-26<423
25-1
'.1
B. Provide correspondence from the appropriate providers acknowledging notice of the
proposed development and phasing, and indicating whether present facilities and
manpower are capable of serving the project or specifying the additional
manpower/equipment necessary to serve the development. If the provider is from
another jurisdiction, the letter should also identify any non-facility-related problems
in providing said service.
Letters of request of service availability from Collier County EMS (Attachment 25.B-1),
Immokalee Fire Control District (Attachment 25.B-2), and the Collier County Sheriff's Office
(Attachment 25.B-3) have been requested and will be provided upon receipt.
723612004-135536 Ver:(}1!-MPERRY
-
0378&-Ol3-000-PORI-28423
25-2
WilsOnMille('
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
.'8C
June 10, 2004
Attachment 25.B-l
Mr. Jeff Page
Collier County EMS
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. H
Naples, Florida 34112
Subject:
Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DRI
Dear Mr. Page:
The Ave Maria University and New Town Development is a proposed university and community
development located in northeastern Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp
Keais Road. The project is proposed to consist of the Ave Maria University Campus and
companion residential and commercial developments and associated amenities. Please find
endosed a copy of the site and location maps indicating the general location of the subject
project.
On behalf of our dient we are hereby requesting that your office review the endosed site and
location maps and issue a Letter of Service Availability for this project at your earliest convenience
to accompany the DRI submittal for the project.
If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact me at (239)
649-4040.
Sincerely,
~;;'~@~/.k
Project Manager
25-3
Endosures
Ce: Donald R. Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P.E., Barron Collier Companies
John English. P.E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry, Wilson Miller
Offices $I,al'olcally local.d 10 $e,v. ou, .1I.nl$ 800.649.4336
Naple$/Corporale 0",&8 3200 Bailey Lane. Suile 200. Naples, Florida 34105 . 239.649.4040 . Fax 239.643.5716
w1lsonmlller.com
~138477 Ver.oU..CPAJER
~-.,- - "
~ECQR.279lI8
WlfsonMIlIer.lflc. - FL Lie.' ie-COOOll0
WilsonMillerw
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
"8' C
."' . .
June 10,2004
Mr. Raymond Alvarez, Fire Chief
Immokalee Fire Control District
502 East New Market Road
Immokalee, FL 34142
Attachment 25.B-2
Subject:
Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DR!
Dear Mr. Alvarez:
The Ave Maria University and New Town Development is a proposed university and community
development located in northeastem Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp
Keais Road. The project is proposed to consist of the Ave Maria University Campus and
companion residential and commercial developments and associated amenities. Please find
enclosed a copy of the site and location maps indicating the general location of the subject
project.
On behalf of our client we are hereby requesting that your office review the enclosed site and
location maps and issue a Letter of Service Availability for this project at your earliest convenience
to acrompany the DRI submittal for the project.
If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact me. at (239)
649-4040.
Sincerely,
~' ~(Ic-
_ J. Pa;eo-. P.~
Project Manager .
Enclosures
Cc: Donald R. Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P.E., Barron Collier Companies
John English, P.E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller
25-4
Offices s/ra/eolcally loca/ed 10 serve our cllen/s 800.649.4336
Napfes/Corporale Office 3200 Bailey Lane, SUite 200. Naples, Florida 34105 . 239.649.4040. Fax 239.643.5716
wllsonmlller.com
611B'2004-1384n Ver. 011. CPAJER
-
03786-330-000- ECQR. 27968
W/IsDnMlllsf,lnc. _ FL Lk.' LC-COOOT70
WIlSOnMlller-
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
80
June 10, 2004
Attachment
25.B-3
Sheriff Don Hunter
Collier County Government Complex, Building J
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
Subject:
Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DRI
Dear Sheriff Hunter:
Ave Maria is a planned town and university proposed to be developed in northeastem Collier
County on approximately 4,995 acres, consisting of 11,000 residential units, and including
amenities such as golf courses, community c1ublvillage centers, and commercial areas with
approximately 1,200,000 square feet. The development of the PDA phase of the project is
scheduled to begin in the fall of 2004 with the opening of the University campus and the initial
occupancy of the residential and commercial areas scheduled for the fall of 2006. The
development of the DRI portions of the site are anticipated to continue through 2016.
The project is located in Sections 31, 32, and 33 of Township 47S, Range 29E and Sections 4,
5,6,7,8,9, 16, 17 and 18, ofTownship 48S, Range 29E in Collier County. The project is
located between Immokalee Road and Oil Well Road, west of Camp Keais Road. Access
points to the project will initially be provided from Oil Well Road with an additional access from
Camp Keais Road to be added in the future. For your reference, a copy of the project location
map has been included with this request.
As part of the DRI ADA, Question 25, Police and Fire Protection, written acknowledgment from
your office is required stating that your organization will be able to provide police service to the
project. Your written acknowledgment of service availability correspondence will be
incorporated into WilsonMiller's ADA submittal.
We intend to submit the ADA on or before July 23, 2004; therefore, your prompt reply is
appreciated. If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact
me at (239) 649-4040.
Sincerely,
sonMi/ler, Inc.
.
Craig J. paj~7J;
I~
Ene:
Cc:
Donald R. Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P.E., Barron Collier Companies
John English, P .E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller
Off/cBS $trateglca/ly located to urve our c/lent$ 800.649.4336
NapleslColJ1orate O<<lce 3200 Bailey L3ne, Suite 2OIJ. Naples. Florida 34105 . 239.649.4040 . Fax 239.643.5116
wllsonmllJer.com
25-5
llf10121)04. 138478 Vet: 011- CPAJER
-
O37ll6-33O-CJOOECOR-27V68
WlfstJnMII"r.lnc. - FL Lie.' LC-COOQI70
~ 8C
QUESTION 26 - RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Existing Level of Service: N/A
Adopted Level of Service Standard: per the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Overlay requirement for a town, 200 square feet of community park land per dwelling unit and
open space minimum 35% of SRA
Level of Service After Project Buildout:: LOS will rneet or exceed the requirement of the RLSA
A. Describe the recreational facilities and open space (including acreage) which will be
provided on-site. Locate on Map H. Identify which of these areas or facilities will be
open to the general public.
The Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.27.10.A.1.e requires that 35% of
the gross acreage (that area of development within an SRA that requires the consumption
of stewardship credits) of an SRA town consist of open space. Ave Maria will meet or
exceed this requirement. Open space will include active and passive parks, golf courses
and trails, lakes, and wetland preserves. Map H indicates wetland preserves, parks, and
lakes, but does not delineate other open space uses such as golf courses and open spaces
within individual tracts as the.
B. Will the development remove from public access lands or waters previously used by
residents of the region for hunting, fishing, boating or other recreation uses?
Specify.
No, lands are currently not accessible by the public.
C. Will parks and open space be dedicated to the city or county? If not, who will
maintain the facilities?
Parks and open space will be owned, operated and maintained by the Ave Maria
Stewardship Community District or the developer or master property owners association.
D. Please describe how the proposed recreation and open space plan is consistent
with local and regional policies.
The Town will adequately address requirements of both the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and the Strategic Regional Policy Plan (as adopted in 2002) of the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council.
The Regional Policy Plan (2002) contains policies relating to the preservation,
enhancement, and maintenance of wetland areas. The Town will preserve. enhance,
and maintain 62 acres of wetlands.
The Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.27.10.C.1, requires that towns
shall have community parks with a minimum of 200 square feet per dwelling unit in the
112312004- 13553e Vet: 011. MPERRY 26-1
C~
0378&-Ol3-(l()O.-PDRI-28423
town. This yields a total community park acreage of 50.5 acres. The Master Plan for ther 8 C
Town of Ave Maria provides two community parks totaling 61 acres. A number of smaller
neighborhood parks will also be incorporated into individual neighborhoods.
The Town will also adhere to section 2.2.27.10.J.6.b of the Collier County Land
Development Code requiring that a minimum of 35 percent of the SRA land (that area of
development within an SRA that requires the consumption of stewardship credits) be
devoted to open space.
E. Does the project have the potential for impacting a recreation trail designated
pursuant to Chapter 260, F.S., and Chapter 16D-7, F.A.C.? If so, describe the
potential impact.
The Town of Ave Maria will not impact a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter
260, F.S., and Chapter 16D-7, FAC.
12004- 135536 Vf:f: 01!- MPERRY
~
113786-013-0Q0.PDRI-28423
26-2
"sc
QUESTION 27 - EDUCATION
A. If the development contains residential units, estimate the number of school age
children expected to reside in the development. Use class breakdowns appropriate
to the area in which the development is located (specify on chart below):
Table 27.A-1 indicates the number of students expected to reside in the Town and
distributes students by elementary, middle and high school.
Table 27.A-1
School Age Children By Level
K-5 6-8 9-12 Total
@35% @33% @32%
Total Student Generation 870 821 796 2,487
Notes:
11,000 residential units, population of 24,281 residents, population and distribution is
based on 2000 Census and from population studies of similar communities.
B. Will school facilities or sites be dedicated or otherwise provided on the site?
Both a K-8 public school and a K-12 private school are planned for the Town of Ave
Maria. The K-8 public school site(s) will be provided to the Collier County School
District. The sites will be located in the cornmunity facilities district (CF). The School
District collects a school impact fee of $1,778 per single-family unit and $827 for each
multi-farnily residential unit. Total school impact fees generated from The Town of Ave
Maria will be approximately $15.6 million. The K-12 private school will have a design
capacity of 900 students. The K-8 public school site will accommodate facilities with an
estirnated capacity of 2,100 students (900 students in K-5, and 1,200 students in 6-8).
C. Attach a letter from the appropriate school board, acknowledging receipt of the
estimated school age population information in (A) above, and providing a statement
of what capital improvement adjustments would be necessary to accommodate
these students.
Attached is correspondence to Mr. David Lesansky, Facilities Coordinator for the Collier
County School District (Attachment 27.C-1) requesting verification of service to the Town
of Ave Maria. The letter of response will be provided upon receipt.
1/2312004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,-
03786-01J..{lO(). PORI. 28423
27-1
"RC
Attachment 27.C-l
June 15, 2004
Mr. Dave Lesansky
Director of Facilities Planning and Construction
Collier County Public Schools
5704 Cougar Lane
Naples, FI 34109
RE: Town of Ave Maria DRI
Dear Mr. Lesansky:
WilsonMiller is pleased to represent the Barron Collier Company in its submittal of the Town of
Ave Maria Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Town of Ave Maria contains
approximately 4,995 acres and is located north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp Keais Road.
The Ave Maria University is within the Town. The University is the first major Catholic University
to be built in the United States in more than forty years. The campus site was donated by
Barron Collier Companies and will become a center of educational, intellectual and spiritual
activities within the Town. The Town will be a compact, sustainable, mixed use community, with
significant open space throughout.
The Town of Ave Maria is being developed pursuant to the Collier County's Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay in accordance with the goals, objectives, and policies contained in
Collier County's Growth Management Plan, and the development standards contained in the Land
Development Code.
At buildout, the Town of Ave Maria is anticipated to include 11,000 residential dwelling units,
690,000 square feet of retail/service, 510,000 square feet of office, 400 hotel rooms, the 6,000-
student university, 450 units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community
and miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, a K-12 private school, and
uses customarily associated with a town, such as golf courses, lakes, open space, and community
support facilities, and those uses customarily associated with a university such as student and
administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support facilities. Buildout is anticipated in
the year 2016. A K-8 public school facility is also planned for inclusion.
As part of the DRI Application for Development Approval (ADA), Question 27, Education,
acknowledgment from your office is required stating that Collier County Public Schools can
adequately serve the Town of Ave Maria DRI. Your letter will be made a part of the ADA
submittal.
Your prompt reply is appreciated. Please contact me at 239-939-1020 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Sharon Jenkins-Owen, AICP
Project Planner
611512004-33178 Ve,:02:!.SJo-n
c_
Z5555-555-555..0
27_ 2
1I'8C
QUESTION 28 - HEALTH CARE
A. Describe the health care services and facilities that will be required to meet the
health needs generated by this project. Please provide a letter from the various
providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and ability to serve
the project.
As indicated in Table 28.A-1, approximately 76 acute care beds and 187 long term beds
may be needed to accommodate the project. Attachment 28.A-1 is a letter from Edward
Morton, CEO of NCH Healthcare System acknowledging their ability to provide health care
services to the Town of Ave Maria.
North Collier Hospital, located on Immokalee Road at the terminus of Goodlette-Frank
Road, is approximately 20 miles frorn the subject property.
The Town plan has included 35,000 square feet allocated to medical facilities and doctors'
offices and medical-related services are a permitted and expected use within the office
allocations in the Mixed-Use districts.
Table 28.A-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Project Demand for Health Care Facilities
Projected Population Projected Acute Projected Long
Estirnated Population 65 and Older' Care Beds Term Beds
24,281 8,485 76 187
Per the Health Planning Council of Southwest Florida's District 8 Health Plan 2003-2006, demand
ratios are as follows:
Acute Care Beds - 3.13 beds per 1,000 population
Long Term Beds - 22 beds per 1,000 population for age 65 or older
7/2312004- 135536 Ver: 01!. MPERRY
c~,
037I11>-01:J..OQO.PDRt-26423
28-1
Naples Campus
350 Seventh StreetN.
Naples, Florida 34102
(239) 436-5000
NCH
Atta~~~~28.A~1
Healthcare
System
----
North Collier Campus
11190 Healthpark Boulevard
Naples. Florida 34110
(239) 513-7000
;;;:;'1SU!S1.~
Ms. Margaret Perry, A.I.C.P.
Land Use Planner
Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane at Airport Road, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
RECEIVED
WILSON MILLER
JUN 1 8 2OO't
I
June 16, 2004
FOLDER#
Dear Ms. Perry:
This letter is to verify that Naples CommWlity Hospital along with its North Collier
Hospital affiliate are capable of providing healthcare services to Ave Maria University
and the Village of Ave Maria.
If! may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 436-5113.
Sincerely,
~/'~(/k(n/~
~A. Morton
CEO
28-2
www.NCHmd.org
~ 8C
QUESTION 29 - ENERGY
D. Describe any energy conservation methods or devices incorporated into the plan of
development. What considerations relative to energy conservation will be
incorporated into the site planning, landscape, and building design, and equipment
and lighting selection for this project?
From SWFRPC Supplemental Questions and Clarification:
As an option to responding to this question in its entirety, please respond to
question D. Provide a response in the following or a similar format, with those items
appropriate (residential vs. nonresidential) to that as follows:
The Town of Ave Maria will incorporate the following energy conservation features:
a. Provision of a bicycle/pedestrian system connecting all land uses, to be placed along
arterial and collector roads within the project. This system is to be consistent with local
government requirements.
b. Provision of bicycle racks or storage facilities in recreational, commercial, and multi-family
residential areas.
c. Cooperation in the locating of bus stops, shelters, and other passenger and system
accommodations for a transit system to serve the project area.
d. Use of energy-efficient features in window design.
e. Use of operable windows and ceiling fans.
f. Installation of energy-efficient appliances and equipment.
g. Prohibition of deed restrictions or covenants that would prevent or unnecessarily hamper
energy conservation efforts (e.g., building orientation, clotheslines, and solar water heating
systems).
h. Reduced coverage by asphalt, concrete, rock, and similar substances in streets, parking
lots, and other areas to reduce local air temperatures and reflected light and heat.
i. Installation of energy-efficient lighting for streets, parking areas, recreation areas, and other
interior and exterior public areas.
j. Use of water closets with a maximum flush of 3.5 gallons and shower heads and faucets
with a maximum flow rate of 3.0 gallons per minute (at 60 pounds of pressure per square
inch).
k. Selection of native plants, trees, and other vegetation and landscape design features that
reduce requirements for water, fertilizer, maintenance, and other needs.
)/2004- 135536 Ver 011- MPERRY
~,
0378&(01)..OOO-PDRI-26423
29-1
'"
8e
I. Planting of native shade trees to provide reasonable shade for all recreation areas, streets,
and parking areas.
m. Placement of trees to provide needed shade in the warmer months while not overly
reducing the benefits of sunlight in the cooler rnonths.
n. Planting of native shade trees for each residential unit.
o. Orientation of structures, as possible, to reduce solar heat gain by walls and to utilize the
natural cooling effects of the wind.
p. Provision for structural shading wherever practical when natural shading cannot be used
effectively.
q. Inclusion of porch/patio areas in residential units.
r. Consideration by the project architectural review committee(s) of energy conservation
measures (both those noted here and others) to assist builders and residents in their efforts
to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development.
The incorporation of those energy conservation measures in this Development of Regional Impact
does not preclude the provision of additional energy conservation measures by the applicant. It
also does not prevent the local govemment of jurisdiction or any state, regional, or other agency
under whose jurisdiction this project falls from requiring additional energy measures or measures
that may be more stringent.
312004- 135536 Ver 011- MPERRY
,~
03786-013-0Q0.PDRI.21l423
29-2
~8C
QUESTION 30 - HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
A.1. Describe any known historical or archaeological sites on the development site.
Provide a letter from the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources
(DHR) which includes a list of known sites within the development site, the
likelihood of historical or archaeological sites occurring within the development site,
whether a site survey is needed, and whether any known sites are significant.
DHR requested that a cultural resource assessment survey be conducted for the Town of
Ave Maria. Please refer to Attachment 30-1, a letter from Janet Matthews to Ross Morton,
dated November 3, 2003.
A.2. If DHR recommends that a site survey be done, the results of such a survey,
conducted for the development site by an acceptable professional, should be
provided.
Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) prepared and submitted a cultural resource
predictive model: Ave Maria University Collier County, Florida to DHR, in January 2004.
The predictive model was approved by DHR. Please refer to Attachment 30-2, a letter
from Frederick Gaske to Marion Almy dated February 4, 2004.
Based on the approved predictive model, ACI conducted a cultural resource assessment
survey (CRAS) of the Ave Maria Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) in March and
April 2004. This CRAS was approved by DHR as indicated in Attachment 30-3, a letter
from Frederick Gaske to David Genson dated April 21, 2004.
ACI submitted an Addendum to DHR for review and approval on July 20, 2004. This
Addendum cornpletes the cultural resource assessment effort for this project. Due to the
size of the documents, copies of the CRAS and the Addendum are not included with this
submittal; however, the applicant will provide copies to individual reviewers upon request.
B. If significant historical or archaeological sites exist on-site, indicate what measures
would be taken to protect them, or to minimize or mitigate impacts to them. Where
appropriate, describe the measures for providing public access to the sites.
Based on available data from the Florida Master Site File (FMSF), one historic property
was recorded within a portion of the Town of Ave Maria. The Second Seminole War Fort
Doane (8CR660) is recorded as a general vicinity site in the southeast quarter of Section 6,
Township 48 South, Range 29 East. Systematic and intensive metal detecting and
subsurface archaeological testing was conducted in this area. As a result of this effort, no
evidence of this resource was found. Additionally, no other archaeological or historic
resources were discovered within the Town. Thus, it is the opinion of Archaeological
Consultants, Inc. (ACI) that development of this property will have no effect on any
archaeological sites or historic resources that are listed, determined eligible, or considered
potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP.
312004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~,
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
30-1
8e
Nonetheless, New Town Development, LLLP recognizes the importance of Seminole War
history to Collier County and southwest Florida. Therefore. the developer, in cooperation
with ACI, Mr. Ron Jamro, Director Collier County Museums, and other interested parties,
will continue researching Second Seminole War fortifications and encampments in Collier
County and the project vicinity. This research and the historical data included in the cultural
resource assessment survey report and the Addendurn will be used to develop text for a
historical marker cornmemorating Second Seminole War activities, which will be placed at
an appropriate location within the Town.
:312004.135536 Ver. 011_ MPERRY
~
OJ78~Ot3.000-PDRI-2!lo423
30-2
,
Attachment 30-1
..,~r:.,:-.
...4; '~"..
,~~ <.' " <10
.. ,..
~:
~J
1
.l
.1.~ ~l '
tls~~~
NOV 1 I 2003
I
-'
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HlSfORICAL RESOURCES
FOLDER#_
Mr. Ross Morton
South Florida Water Management District
Lower West Coast Regional Service Center
230 I McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
R.e: - DI1IfN"0: 2003-=9474/ Received by'DB:R: Septemoeillf, 2003 ~ TI/<l/B-
Application No. 030910-14
Applicant: Barron Collier Investments & Barron Collier Partnership
Project: Ave Maria University and ToWll/ Collier County
~: 't>~'l~ d. ~~
1'"-.. J~.s
November 3,~ bw-~
~...4."\~
~~
'*
Dear Mr. Morton:
Our office received and reviewed the referenced project in accordance with Chapters 267 and
373, Florida Statutes, Florida's Coastal Management Program, and implementing state
regulations, regarding possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the
National Register of Hi3torJc Place3, or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological
value. The State Historic Preservation Officer is to_ advise and assist state and federal agencies
when identifying historic properties,assessing effects upon them, and considering alternatives to
avoid or minimize adverse effects.
A review of the Florida Master Site File and our records indicates that there are no recorded
archaeological sites or historic structures locat~d within the subject parcel. However, this is not
considered definitive because the project area has never been subjected to a systematic,
professional survey to locate such properties. In addition, available envirolUl1ental data for the
area support the possibility forumecorded archaeological sites occuning in the area of potential
effect for this project. It is, therefore, the opinion of this office that there is a reasonable
probability of some proposed project activIties impacting historic properties.
Since potentially significant archaeological and historic sites may be present, it is our
recommendation that the project area be subjected to a systematic, professional archaeological
and historical survey. The purpose of this survoy will be to locate and assess the significance of
historic properties present. The r~ltant survey report shall conform to the specifications set
forth in Chapter I A-46, Florida Adminf3trotive Code, and will need to be forwarded to this office
in order to complete the process ofreviewirtg the impact of this proposed project on historic
properties.
The results of the investigations will detennine if significant historic properties would be
disturbed by this project. In addition, if si~ficant remains are located, the data described in the
report and the consultant's conclusions WIll assist this office in determining measures that must
be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigato adverse impacts to historic properties listed, or eligible
for listing in the National Register of Hi3toric Places, or otherwise of historical or architectural
significance.
500 S. Bronough Street. TalllilhalSee, FL 3Z399-0150 . http://www.f1beritage.com
o Diredor'. Office CJ Archaeological hautcll iii Historic PreJervation 0 Historical Museum.
(1150) 245-6300 . PAX, 245-6435 (850) 248-6444 . PAX: 245-6436 (850) 245-6333 . PAX: 245-6437 (850) 245-1\400 . PAX: 245-6433
CI Palm Beach Regional Offire 0 St. Augw,ttne R.egional Office [] Tamp. R.egional Offlte
(561) ~1475 . FAX: ~1476 (904) '25-5045 ' pA)(: S25-5044 (813) 272-3843 . FAX: 272-2340
I
:
,
;
30-3
L
r-
li".-_
rn~8C
Mr. Morton
November 3, 2003
Page 2
Because this letter and its contents are a matter of public record. consultants who have knowledge
of our recommendations may contact the applicant. This sliould in no way be interpreted as an
endorsement by this agency. The Registry of Professional Archaeologist (RP A) is the national
certifying organization for archaeologists. A listing of archaeologists who are RP A members
living or working in Florida can be accessed at http://dhr.dos.state.fl.uslbhp/compliance. hi .
addition. the complete RP A Directory of Certified Professional Archaeologists is available at
www.rpanet.org. Otherwise. upon request, we wilHorward our RPA list to the applicant.
If you have any questions concerning our comments. please contact Samantha Earnest, Historic
Sites Specialist,.at.oeam.est@dos,stat...fl.~er- (850)245-6333. Your-interest;8 protecting-
Florida's historic properties is appreciated.
Sincerely,
~,_.o_ :_Q..~. G.JLI~~S\\\>D
~ _ Janet Snyder Matthews. Ph.D.. Director, and"
h State Historic Preservation Officer
Xc: Mr. John English
-, - ---,._' ----'..--------~.,--~~_._.-
30-4
Attachment 30-2
l.iJi:~7~cf:
~",~,,'Tl'~
d,,"~ <~~.;;~:~)}~
~.'.-..'....'
.,,~ _! .' , ' 1
,. ,.1
".1,
reG
m J};@;g; JIW;Z ~
FES 0 92004 /UJ
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION Of HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Ms. Marion Alroy
Archa,ological Consultants, Inc.
81 \0 E.laikie Coun, Suite ^
Sarasoa, Florida 34240
Re: DHR No. 2004-757 I Date Received by DHR: January 29, 2004
Cultural Resource Predictlve A1ode/: Ave Maria University, Collier County, Florida
February 4, 2004
Dear tvs. Almy:
Our of!ice received and reviewed the referenced report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373,
Florida Statutes, Florida's Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations,
regarding possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the Natiorwl
Regls/e' oj His/oric Places, or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological value. The
Slale Historic Preservation Officer is to advise and assist stale and federal agencies when
identifying historic propenies, assessing effects upon them, and considering alternatives to avoid
or minim izc adverse effects.
Our office concurs with the recommended field methodologies developed with this predictive
model. We look forward to receiving the final report detailing the results of Phase I
investigations.
If you h lYe any questions conccming our comments, please contact Samantha Earnest, Historic
Sites Specialist, at seamest@dos.state.f1.us or (850) 245-6333. Your interest in protecting
Florida',; historic propel1ies is appreciated.
Sincerely,
~'U<-t'- rJ.. ~/ ~
~
Frederick Gaske, Acting Director, and
Deputy ~;Iate Historic Preservation Officer
SIlO S. Bronough Stre...t . T>>J1:.lhassee, }1~L 32399-0250 . http://www.nherib.g~.com
o Director's :)ffice 0 Archa~l)logicall~esearch III HI!IJoric Preservation a Jllstoricitl Museum...
(1i50) 24S-63DO. F '\X: 245-6435 (850) 24.')"6444. FAX: 245-64.36 (ISO) 245-63M. flAX~:Z45-6437 (850) 245-6400. FAX; 215-6433
o Palm Bca<:h Regional Office 0 Sf. AuguSUM 1le11~1 Offiu n Taml?a Regional Office
(56\) 279-1475 . FAX: 279-147h (904) 625-5045 . PAX: a~5-5044 (BB) 272-384,1 . FAX; 272-2340
30-5
"------ ~
Attachment 30-3
, 8 C
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
~
Mr. David B. Genson
Barron Collier Companies
2600 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, Florida 34105
Re: DHR Project File No. 2004-2721 (2004-757) I Received by DHR: March 26, 2004
Cultural Resource Assessment Survey: Ave Maria Preliminary Deve/opment Agreement (PDA)
Property, Collier County, Florida.
April 21, 2004
DellrMr. 'Genson:
Our office received and reviewed the referenced report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373 of the
Florida Statutes for assessment of possible adverse impact to historic properties listed or eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, architectural or
archaeological value.
Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted an archaeological and historical investigation of the
central 960 acres of the Ave Maria Property on behalf of Barron Collier Companies, in accordance with
the Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) previously submitted by ACI and approved by this office
(DHR Project File No. 2004-757). Ground surface reconnaissance and subsurface investigation of areas
exhibiting potential for the location of historic properties resulted in the identification of no
archaeological sites or historic structures within the PDA project area.
It is the opinion of ACI that development of the PDA portion of the Ave Maria property will have no
effect on historical properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. ACI
recommends no further investigation of this area. Based on the information provided, our office concurs
with these determinations and finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance with
Chapter IA-46, Florida Administrative Code.
These recommendations pertain only to the PDA portion of the Ave Maria parcel. We look forward to
r~eiving future addendums to this report detailing the results of Phase I investigations
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and remaining portions of the project area.
If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Ariana Slemmens, Historic Sites
Specialist, by phone at (850) 245-6333, or by electronic mail at abslemmens(a),dos.state.fl.us. Your
continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated.
Sincerely,
~ <t. J11:..~ .
bt5IfP<5Y~& ~
Frederick Gaske, Acting Director, and
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
r
500 S. Bronough Street. TaUahassee, FL 32399-0250 . http://www.nheritage.com
[] Director's Office
(850) 245-6300 . FAX 245-6435
o Archaeological Research
(850) 245-6444 . FAX, 245-6436
ItI' Historic Preservation
(850) 245-6333 . FAX, 245-6437
CJ Historical Museums
(850) 245-6400 ' FAX, 245-6433
o Palm Beach Regional Office
(561) 279-1475' FAX, 279-1476
CI St. Augustine Regional Office [] Tampa Regional Oflice
(904) 825-5045 . FAX' 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 . FAX, 272-2340
30-6
'8e
PART VI. Specific DRllnformation
QUESTION 38 - SCHOOLS
A. For the proposed development, indicate:
1. existing and proposed enrollment by phase, in Full Time Equivalents,
AMU Phase 1 (2011) student enrollment - 3,150
AMU Phase 2 (2016) student enrollment (cumulative) - 6,000
2. type of support or management (public, private or proprietary),
AMU will be privately managed.
3. all governmental revenue sources and the level of their contributions,
AMU receives no government grants or revenue. Sorne students receive financial
aid through various government entities. This is strictly an entitlement for the
student. AMU does not receive nor retain any of this aid.
4. schedule of facility utilization, and
Facilities planned for opening day in 2006 will be constructed to accommodate
utilization of up to 1,000 students. Facilities will include academic buildings, student
housing, administration buildings and sports and recreation facilities.
Facilities will be expanded through the first Phase to support up to 3,150 students,
dependent on student enrollment. Facilities will continue to expand over the final
years, as necessary to accommodate the utilization of the total projected student
enrollment of 6,000 students.
5. academic organization and programs.
AMU is a academic institution that pledges faithfulness to the teachings of the
Catholic Church and is committed to providing one of the finest classical liberal
arts curricula available. Ave Maria University exists to further teaching, research,
and learning in the abiding tradition of Catholic thought in both national and
international settings.
A President who reports to a Board of Trustees will direct the organizational
structure of Ave Maria. A campus Chancellor will report to the President.
Acadernic organization will include:
1) Provost (Vice President for Academic Affairs)
2) Deans over large divisions
3) Department chairs
4) University Librarian
7/2312004-135536 Ver:01!-MPERRY
-
03786-013-OOO-PDRI-28423
38-1
rsc
Administrative Governance will include
1) Vice President for Business and Administration
2) Vice President for Development
3) Vice President for Enrolment Management
4) Vice President or Dean for Student Life
5) Vice President for Research
Academic programs will include both undergraduate and graduate levels. AMU's
undergraduate programs include Biology, Classics and Early Christian Literature,
Economics, History, Literature, Mathematics, Philosophy, Political Science,
Theology and Pre-Theologate: Preparatory School of Theology.
The University's Graduate Division currently offers two areas of graduate study at
the master's level, one (M.T.S.) in theology in the areas of pastoral and
speculative theological studies, and the other (MAE.E.) in teacher education with
a specialization in exceptional education.
In addition to academics, AMU will offer a fully range of men's and women's
intercollegiate sports, including baseball, basketball, football, golf, tennis,
swimming, track and volleyball.
B. From what counties will students be drawn? Estimate by number and percentage.
Currently at the AMU Interim campus, students represent 32 states, including 8 counties in
Florida. AMU intends to recruit students from all over the United States and abroad.
c. Identify the design population of the proposed facility, and describe the
methodology and assumptions used to derive it.
Ira Fink, a recognized independent authority on University/college programming located in
Berkley, California, was retained by AMU to provide consulting services to determine
student populations and programming needs. Mr. Fink has over 25 years of experience in
this field.
AMU is designed to serve 6,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The
methodologies involved to reach the student population included research, studies and
comparisons of a variety of similar universities throughout the United States. The
assumptions used for the design population included a fall 2006 enrollment estimate of
1,000 students. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase by approximately 300-
450 students per year during Phase 1, and by roughly 500-600 students per year during
Phase 2. Based on these rates of growth assumptions, the campus will reach 6,000
students in 2016.
712312004"135536 Ver:01!-MPERRY
c_
037~13-000-PDRI-28423
38-2
-
-
WilsonMiller"
..
New Directions In Planning. Design & Engineering
-
THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA
-
-
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
-
-
-
TRANSPORTATION APPENDICES
-
-
July, 2004
-
Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336 wilsonmiller.com
-
DRI-2004-AR-6293
PROJECT #2004070044
DATE: 8/3/04 .~.
RAY BELLOWS . ~C';'"
(COMPANION TO S - 0 R-4518f ~i'
.'''1\
'aG
Appendix 21-1
ki"""
Be
',,,.
Question 21 (Transportation)
STUDY AREA
Roadway Segment Analyses
The initial study area for the Town of Ave Maria DRI extends westward to 1-75,
eastward to SR-29, northward to SR-29 and southward to Golden Gate Boulevard,
as shown on Figure 1. The study area may be expanded or contracted based upon
the 5% significance criteria as established by Rule 9J-2.045, Florida
Administrative Code (FAC). Pursuant to the DRI rules, a project has "significant"
impact on a roadway segment if the project traffic is predicted to be 5% or more
of the segment's existing plus committed (E+C) service volume at the level of
service (LOS) established by the County's Growth Management Plan except for
roadways on the Florida Intrastate Highway System, in which case the FDOT's
adopted standards are used. A project's impact is considered "adverse" if the
significantly impacted road segments are operating below the applicable LOS
standards.
The DRI analysis will include a study of existing conditions, future conditions at
the end of each phase without project traffic, and future conditions at the end of
each phase with project traffic.
Intersection Analyses
The following intersections will be reviewed to determine if they are significantly
impacted by development traffic representing 5% or more of the PM peak hour
directional service volume at the adopted LOS standard for any approach.
Intersections to be reviewed include:
. Project Entrances @ Oil Well Road
. Project Entrances @ Camp Keais Road
. Oil Well Road @ Everglades Boulevard
. Oil Well Road @ Immokalee Road
. Oil Well Road @ Camp Keais Road
. Oil Well Road at SR-29
. Immokalee Road @ SR-29
. Immokalee Road @ Camp Keais Road
. Immokalee Road @ Randall Boulevard
. Immokalee road @ Wilson Boulevard
. Immokalee Road @ Collier Boulevard
. Immokalee Road@I-75
. Collier Boulevard @ Vanderbilt Drive
. Collier Boulevard @ Golden Gate Boulevard
An intersection LOS analysis will be conducted for those intersections found to
be significantly impacted by the project. The latest available version of SYNCHRO
5118/2004.135470 Ver:021.MPERRY
0_
03786.013-<lOO-PDRI.28424
,.
80
software will be used to perform the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) compliant
analysis.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
For the purposes of this analysis, year 2003 will be used to represent existing
conditions. Collier County has adopted a methodology for using a 10-month
factored traffic volume level of service standard in its Growth Management Plan
and Land Development Code.
Traffic data needed to establish the existing conditions will be obtained from the
Collier County Transportation Department and FDOT. The applicant will collect
supplemental data if needed.
All traffic data will be converted to peak hour directional volumes. Supplemental
counts will be converted from their count day to an Average Annual Daily Traffic
(AADT) estimate using 2002 weekly seasonal factors provided by FDOT, unless
Collier County provides more recent factors. AADT volumes will be converted to
peak hour two-way volumes using the K factor established by Collier County.
Peak hour two way volumes will be converted to peak hour peak directional
volumes using either the directional split observed in the peak hour of the count
day in the first quarter of 2002 (as collected by Collier County), or by directional
splits observed in counts taken by the applicant.
The LOS analysis will be based upon peak hour directional traffic conditions as
reflected in the Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR).
Service volumes from the AUIR will be used except for FIHS facilities as
described earlier, in which case FDOT LOS service volumes identified in the
Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning will be
substituted. In most cases, Collier County's LOS service volumes are based upon
detailed analyses using applications such as the FDOT ART_PLAN software. In
cases where a more generalized method was used to develop the adopted service
volumes, the applicant may substitute a service volume using more detailed
analysis to determine the actual operating conditions. Levels of service will be
expressed as the ratio of the traffic volume to the minimum standard level of
service threshold volume, rather than a letter grade (A through F).
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED (E+C) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The DRI Rule provides for the use of any roadway or intersection improvement
identified within the first three years of the Collier County work program (AUIR) or
the FDOT 5-Year Work Program in determining the existing plus committed (E+C)
roadway network. The analysis will incorporate the appropriate improvements
from Collier County's 2003 AUIR and from the latest available version of the FDOT
Adopted Work Program - District 1, Fiscal Year 2004 - 2008. The following
programmed improvements within the study area will be assumed in the E+C
network.
5/1!l12004-135470 Ver:02!-MPERRY
~.
OJ78S-01:J.-OOO-PDRI_28424
~ Be
E+C Improvements
Immokalee Road -1-75 to Collier Boulevard - 6-laning
Immokalee Road - Collier Boulevard to Oil Well Road - 6-laning
Collier Boulevard - Immokalee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard - 4-laning
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT
The Collier County Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure
(FSUTMS) model will be used to develop future conditions without the Project.
2016 land use model input files will be created whose zonal contents are
interpolations between the contents of the existing 2010 and 2020 input files used
during the last update of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Future
background traffic volumes estimated by the simulation model will be converted
to Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) using a seasonal factor either from FOOT
or Collier County. AADT volumes will be converted to peak hour peak direction as
described above.
A level of service determination will be made using the appropriate service
volumes as described previously. For road segment levels of service, the traffic
volume will be an average of the volumes observed at the end points of the
segment. For intersections, levels of service will be based on traffic volumes
adjacent to the intersection.
FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT
The trip generation characteristics for Ave Maria will be estimated using the ITE
Trip Generation 7'" Ed. The ITE rates for residential uses will be compared to
other trip rates established by trip generation surveys/analyses for other similar
mixed-use communities. Those surveys reflect the land uses characteristics of
neighborhoods and communities of the type planned for Ave Maria. Mixed-use
communities often have very different trip generation characteristics (as
compared to conventional developments) due in part to the variations in trip-
making (in trip purpose, numbers of trips and time of day of travel) and the
abundance of on-site amenities and services that encourage internalization of
travel. Additionally, because of Ave Maria's location with respect to alternative
destinations (shopping, recreation, personal business, etc.), residents, students,
etc., will be more likely to choose their destinations within Ave Maria than to
travel to alternative destinations. Another key element that will help determine
internal trip making and use interactions is the University's residence policy.
Because of Ave Maria University's traditional residency policy that requires
undergraduate students to live on campus unless they live at home with their
parents, the likelihood of external commuter traffic being generated by the
campus during the peak hour is minimized. Further, because graduate students
and faculty/staff will be afforded ample housing opportunities within the town,
additional economies in external traffic are likely. By design, University students
and faculty/staff will have direct and convenient pedestrian access to town
core/center activities and support services, further reducing external and internal
vehicular traffic circulation. The alternative trip rates and internal capture
5/18/2004-135470 Ve~02!-MPERRY
c_.
0378f>.01J.-OOO-PDRI_28424
~8C
~ "'~..
assumptions will be documented and provided in the Question 21 Response, and
will be used as appropriate to adjust the ITE trip generation rates.
Internal capture within the Town as a whole will be estimated by comparing the
productions and attractions and developing a land use matrix that accounts for
reasonable trip interchanges between all land uses (residential, university, town
centers, etc.). Internal capture rates will be applied to ITE trip generation rates to
derive external traffic that will be assigned to the arterial/collector network.
The Collier County FSUTMS model will be used to develop future conditions with
the Project. The ITE trip generation formulae, adjusted for internal capture, will be
the basis for the expected external daily traffic to and from the Ave Maria TAZ on
the arterial road network. Consistent with the methodology outlined in the FOOT
ORI Modeling Workshop, the Ave Maria TAZ zonal contents in the residential and
commercial land use data sets will be first loaded with unadjusted projections of
dwelling units by type, hotel and motel rooms, school enrollment, and employees
by type (commercial and service). Commercial square footage projections will be
converted to employment levels using floor area to employee conversion factors
derived from ITE trip generation data. These initial Ave Maria zonal contents will
be uniformly adjusted (preserving relative magnitudes) until the external daily
traffic produced by the model is sufficiently close to the ITE based estimate.
Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, in order for the Town of Ave
Maria to be entitled in its host "receiving" area, "sending" areas in the same or
other TAZs will need to have their development potential reduced. For this reason,
the 2016 land use data sets will be modified to reflect the transfer of development
rights from a selection ofTAZs that contain sending areas to the Ave Maria TAZ.
A report of all TAZ modifications will be provided, in addition to all FSUTMS
model files.
In summary, once the Ave Maria TAZ data is developed, and appropriate
adjustments are made to the surrounding TAZs within the Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay, the model is run, and the Ave Maria TAZ's
socioeconomic data is adjusted uniformly until the external traffic entering/exiting
the ORI TAZ replicates the ITE based trip external trip estimates.
These 2016 Peak Season Weekday Traffic (PSWT) with project traffic estimates
will be converted to peak hour peak direction as follows.
The FSUTMS model will determine the distribution of project traffic on the arterial
network. These daily project traffic volumes will, on a link by link basis, be
subtracted from the total traffic to derive the background PSWT estimate. This
background PSWT will be converted to peak hour peak direction as described
above. Using the project traffic distribution pattern predicted by FSUTMS, the
fraction of total daily traffic observed on each link will be multiplied by the ITE
based external peak hour entering and exiting trip totals to derive the peak hour
project traffic by direction. The project's peak hour directional traffic will be
5118120Q4-135470 Ver:02!-MPERRY
0-
03786-Q13-<lOO-PDRI.2B424
r""8C
j'
',<W'll
added to the background peak hour traffic in the direction of the peak direction in
background traffic. This sum will be used to determine level of service.
As above, for road segment levels of service, the initial daily traffic volumes used
(background and project) will be the averages of the volumes observed at the end
points of the segment. For intersections, levels of service will be based on traffic
volumes adjacent to the intersection.
A level of service determination will be made using the appropriate service
volumes as described previously. Roadways with Project trips that represent 5%
or more of the service volume of the impacted roadway will be considered
significantly impacted. Any such roadways also operating below their adopted
LOS standard will be considered significantly and adversely impacted by the
Project.
FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Based upon the results of the Future Traffic Conditions With Project analysis
described above, a set of recommended roadway improvements to support all
area development coincident with project build-out will be developed. The set of
recommended improvements will be, to the maximum extent feasible, drawn from
the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Financially Feasible and Needs Plans.
511812004.135470 Verc02!-MPERRY
c_
037S6-013-000-PDRI_28424
5f2512004-137904Vor:021_JPERRY
~,
Z5555-5S5-555-.aaaa
SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENTATION
FOR
THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Prepared for:
New Town Development, LLLP
2600 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, FL 34105
Prepared by:
WilsonMiller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
and
Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson, and Johnson, PA
821 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34102
May 25, 2004
rac
:,..,".
8 C'.-'
The following information is being provided to supplement the response to Item "F" (Question
21) in the Pre-Application Document submitted April 30, 2004 for the Town of Ave Maria DRI.
At the Pre-Application Conference held at the Collier County Development Services Center on
May 19, 2004, additional information was provided to the review agencies related to the
transportation analysis methodology intended for use in preparing the response to Question 21
of the Application for Development Approval (ADA).
The following attachments were provided and discussed at length during a transportation
methodology "break-out session" of the Pre-Application/Transportation Methodology
Conference:
. Land Use Summary (Phase 1 - 2011 and Phase 2 - 2016);
. FSUTMS Traffic Model Based Internal Capture Rates;
. Peak Hour Capture Rates Between Land Use Type Clusters;
. Map of Significantly Impacted Links; and
. Map of Adversely Impacted Links.
Following is a summary of the items discussed during the transportation methodology "beak-out
session" of the Pre-Application Conference.
Land Use Overview - the applicant briefly described the land use breakdown, indicating that at
the time of application, the ADA will document the use of any standard or non-standard ITE trip
Generation rates. It is the applicant's intent to develop specific products and mixes of unit types
that target a demographic market that studies have shown provide trip generation
characteristics that are different from the standard ITE rates.
Internal Capture - The applicant has prepared a preliminary trip generation analysis that
carefully considers the trip interchange potential between land uses within town. The town will
provide an abundance of the daily services and goods needed by the residents and university
students. A calculated mix of housing and employment opportunities, as well as essential
shopping personal services, will help retain trips within the town.
Two internal trip capture rates were discussed, one applied to the daily trip total, and a second,
higher capture rate, applied to the p.m. peak hour trip total.
In order to have FSUTMS distribute project traffic, the DRI traffic analysis zone (TAZ) was filled
with enough land uses (residential, employment and school enrollment) to generate the required
external daily traffic volumes. The external daily traffic volume total was based on appropriate
ITE trip generation rates, and then reduced 35% for internal capture. As a by-product of this
distribution analysis technique, an examination of the FSUTMS Model output files revealed that
the FSUTMS model was in fact internally capturing up to 70% of the daily traffic within the DRl's
TAZ. This can be attributed to the availability of a mix of land uses with the TAZ as well as the
geographic location of the TAZ with respect to other accommodating origins and destinations
within the study area.
512512004.137904 Vor:02'.JPERRY
c_,
Z5555-555-555__0000
1
rac
The FSUTMS travel model, used to establish horizon year background traffic (2016) and to
assign project trips, produces peak season daily volumes. On each link, daily project trips were
subtracted from total daily traffic volumes to derive peak season daily background traffic. The
result was converted to peak hour, peak direction background traffic using the appropriate
model output conversion, peak hour conversion, and directional split factors.
Because p.m. peak travel is dominated by the work trips, the internal trip capture rate during the
peak hour is frequently greater than the capture rate for the entire day, for which regular
shopping and personal business travel may be the dominant purposes.
A detailed trip-interchange analysis revealed that by logically matching reasonable levels of
productions to attractions within the town, as much as 62% of the total p.m. peak hour trips
would be satisfied internally. This seems reasonable considering the geographic location of the
Town of Ave Maria and Ave Maria University, and the broad mix of uses planned for the project
that are designed to satisfy the needs of the residents and students. This level of internalized
traffic is further supported by the FSUTMS model experience described earlier.
Signif/cantly & Adversely Impacted Roadway Segments - Following the trip generation and
distribution analysis, a list of significantly and adversely impacted links was established. In
conjunction with the segment analysis, an evaluation of potentially impacted intersections was
made. The following intersections are not found along adversely impacted segments and
therefore, it would be the applicant's intent to exclude these intersections from any further
analyses:
. Collier Boulevard at Green Boulevard;
. Golden Gate Boulevard at Wilson Boulevard; and
. Golden Gate Boulevard at Everglades Boulevard
Additionally, the applicant is also recommending that ramps serving 1-75 at the interchanges of
SR-29, Collier Boulevard, and Bonita Beach Road be excluded from further analyses. Although
in the preliminary analysis of projected DRI traffic the ramps were adjacent to links found to be
significantly and adversely impacted, further analysis indicates the ramps are carrying an
insignificant amount of project traffic. Exhibits document the daily project traffic volumes for the
three interchanges are included.
SR-82 from Corkscrew Road to SR-29 - One particular significantly impacted segment was
discussed in greater detail. SR-82 extends from SR-29 to Fort Myers. The segment from SR-
29 to Corkscrew Road is entirely within Collier County, and was found to be both significantly
and adversely impacted by project traffic. Due to traffic diversion at Corkscrew Road and a
lower adopted level of service standard in Lee County ("E" in Lee County vs. "C" in Collier
County), the segment(s) of SR-82 west of Corkscrew Road were not found to be adversely
impacted.
5I2512004.131904Ver:02!_JPERRY
c_,
Z5555-555.555__I)OOO
2
raG
'"
" '"
[fj
<J) III
<.i '"
III'g
:5u
_ E
"'
in ~
Q)
Q) C
III
::;) Q)
0
'" "' ~
" Q) "'
'j .<: '" Q)
" 0 "C
.2 ~ ~
:J ,.,
<5 .<: '" .a
LL 0 0 :::;
c
"2
rn
ID
c
ID
(9
C-
"c
>-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iii Iii 0 II> 0 0 0 0 0 0
o. .". II> 0 "!. .". 0 '"
" - N 0' uS M
0 ~ ~
u: I- ~ II> ~ N
... II> ~
.a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II>
, '"
" ::l Iii iD '" II> 0 0 0 '" II> N
III <J) N ."f ... ~ ... 0 , N co ...
'" - ~ ~ N M M N N
.<: 0 0 0 0
11. ~ I- !::!o N .". '" '"
'" N
;> I-
Cll .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II>
E . ~ 0 0 0 ~ II> ...
" ::l Iii "'~ 0 .". '" 0 ~ ~ ."..
III <J)
E III - o~ uS 0' uS oi M ~
.<: '" 0 00 ~ ... co
::::I 11. " I- !::!oN .". N
II) 0
GI
Ul -
::l "
"tl " .!!J
c: E III 'r: Q) Q) Q) Q)
Cll l!! "" ::J Q) Q) Q) Q)
...J ::l " Cl lL lL lL lL "' "'
III ::;) ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ "' C C
c: III (;; E Q) Q)
it '" a; "' '" '" '" 'C 'C
:;; " 'C ::l :J ::l ::l 0 ::l ::l
0 Q) D' D' D' D' 0
I- 0 m U) U) U) (fJ 0:: ii5 ii5
"tl
c: r..i
Cll Q)
.?: Cii
'ijj '0
... C
GI '"
.~ C
c: " i.i:
0 -
::l a Cii
"
Cll .;: Q) '6 ~
.;: " " Q)
Cll III .?: ~ :c
::i: '" ::l
C Q) Cii ll.
GI U) ~ 'C
'" Q)
> III "' o<S C C
<( ::;) Q) c Q) '"
~ ~ Q)
'C Q) rn
" '0 E Q)
III '" >
~ lL " " "' "C
"i'ii IE Q) e:.
Cl -e 0 -
c: Q) - "'
.;; C Cii Q) "0 <5
Cii :::; c: " '" 0
~ w 0 '" lL .i':- .<:
'C o<S "00 D. ~ .~ "
Q) Q) "' (fJ U)
'C 1;; 'm Q) r..i a; Q)
'00 '00 '0 '6 > N
Q) "' Q) '5 'r: ~
Q) "' ~ ~ ~
0:: <{ 0:: ll. :;;: I ::J
'"
'"
N
....
wM
ID~
c*
.g ~
"0
(90
-
c
CIl
E
-
III
::I
.~
"C
c(
III
-
C
CIl
-
C
o
U
>-
-
'jj)
...
CIl
>
'c
::J
"C
C
l'll
C
~
o
I-
....
0>
M
CIl
C
o
N
IV "
c 5 S
~ - IV
G.I ~o:::
:5u
..!!!
;;::
-
::l
o
oj
"C
o
::e
IV
E~~
G.I ftS .-
'$(0'=
W
E C; ~
_ C"i:
.=21-
", "'
,,-
_ c:
III "
<: a.
" E
IIlW
E a.
E E
8w
U)
-
c
CIl
-
C
o
o
ili
c
o
N
Gi f:
'0 u
:J:O
"'
Q; E
'00
:J:~
0..
o
0..
U.
::E
:::J
o
u.
::E
(')
oi
'"
'" ~ ~
,....: c:i 0
CD ..... .....
.q- 0 N 0::>
..q 0 C"') "=t
(")~ LO "'l ......
f'-.. -.:i c.o cD
M CD r--.. t--
N N """" co
LO ,...... C") f'-..
...... N~ LO ......
,..: co 0> O'l
N c.o cc co
"'
a.
."
....
1ii
-
o
....
~ 0
o 0
..... .....
<D 00
" ~
'" 00
LO u?
..... .....
<< 0
o 0
..... .....
[g ;:!;
00. 00
LO u?
..... .....
CD 0 CD """"
N V 0 co
co~ Ltl ~ Ltl
co co co co
co co co co
~
'"
co v 0 ...q co co co N
""'" ..... 0 0 en en CD to
c.o~O~"",,"LOl.{)~COqC')
u)~C")NC"')N
LO LO LO LO LO LO
N N N N N N
o
o
'"
oi ~
N
a.
E
W
'0
....
~ M
..... '"
M cO
~
o
N
o
(0
.....
o ~
N N
..... CD
,......- ....:
N N
.".
o
CD
ci
~
o co N N
"""" co ...... O'l
o """" f'-.,. CD
N ..,f Lei tri
..... (')
.". .".
1"--_ 00_
~ (')
o
o
00
o
o
.".
.....
'"
".
(')
.". ~
0; ~_
N <D
0..
o
0..
u.
III
N .".
'" .....
00 00.
-<i .".
o
CD
.....
N '"
N .".
"'- .".
..... r-.:
N N
CD
CD
LO
ci
~
00
N
LO.
o
~
~ '"
CD .".
.".. .".
..... r-.:
N N
00
'"
"
ci
~
.". 0
o 0
"'- '"
o ci
~ ~
...... LO 0) c.o
t--LOLOl.O
(0_ (,0 <0_ <D
LO l{)- LO LO-
....... C"') CD V
LO ....q V V
00_ ~ co_ ~
"""" '<:t ..;t """
N '"
~ 0
~ ~
~ "
N '"
...... CD
'" oi
~
o
~
00
0) V N 0 0> ......
C\I co co 'V ...... C\I
...... (Om co t--_co
Nc6MMMM
...... N C"') C"') C") cry
o N V co O'l co
..q C") N ............
""! N "t N "!. N
NNNN-NC'...r
o
00
00
o <D
N ~
~ ~
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
o en
~ 0
~ ~
(')
en
CD
r-.:
~ CD
'" '"
...... .....
'" oi
'" 0
LO (')
~ ~
o:i o:i
:::J
o
u.
III
c.o 0') ...... 0
co co """ CD
o f'-.. ~ LO
ex) ...: N N
~ N N
~
.!!!
Ii.
'"
:;
::E
o
o
o
o
o
000
000
000
00'"
~ co f"-.:
N N N
'" .".
..... ~
.".. .".
N N
N N
o 0
o 0
o N
00 .....
"'-: ":
N N
o '"
o en
...... <D
'" oi
00 (') '"
..... 00 .....
o q 0
a5 co o:i
.". '"
.". N
<D <D
MM
'" (')
'" en
N ~
.".. .".
N N
N N
o (')
00 <D
'" N
..... .....
I'- ":
N N
':~Ii'"
8C.~'
'E
"
E
u;
"
'C
'"
.".
'"
(')
~
on
'"
N
...
wM
~~
"'It
Ow
, 0
. 0
00
r8C.~
, .
~ I-
o
f
~ '" '" .... '"
<> '" a;l 0:> ~
"'., "'.... ""
2~~~~~
<'.I _ ~ '" '"
i2 ~ ;: ~ ~ ~
;1; r- - ~ :2 :2
<> co ... .,. ""
... '" "'... '"
:: ... - ... ~
jg ~ '" ;r; ~
:e... ... gj
~a~~~
_ M
@~~~~
o
. U
. ~ j)--~
J: i::'", <=
O!l" -"'..
< 0 "
]! ~ t'il
<= '" - <:
~ g ~-
~ ~ 5 ~
... '" "'...
~\~ [}/~ ~~ [}/r
~
j G [ ~ G 1'1 [U
",-0 ~ .!!l-8 ~
gU. '" -- J~~ [ -- .
-5~,g 1r [~
U1~-J , 0 ~ 0
u U M
~ on ~H~ ~G~./r ~H~
G w ~ ~
"
~lr~ ;!
GlrG z
on w
~ u
ii! '"
w
>- ~
~~'I G/; ~G
~H~ IG ~~ ~HG
.. ~ rn ~ ~ .
<; 0
" ~
.
. -- -- -- "
" IT 0 IT 0
0
j i
" "
[}/~ ~G ~/~ ~~
~ ~
~
~
~
",'
'P~ s!ea)l dwe:l
6Z'~'S
,;
a:
'"
'"
iij
""
o
E
.5
+
...
.;:
... ,;
:;;; a:
Gl OJ
>
<( ==
0
6Z '~'S
'P^IS SapelDJa^3
x
SL-I
-ci
'"
"'
u -ci
'ii ~
~~ ~ >
." '" ~ a:l -ci 05
~
- 0 '" > N '" !l > ~
...... .; '2 05 ~
a ~ 'E ~ ~ ."
~ 0 c ~
d) on on a:l -ci 0 ~
u -c:l ~ :;; :;; :;; > ""
t;:: d) s ~ 05 i;< >
~ ~ i'L ~
...... >. '"
.- bI) ;; c- o
51 u ~ E ~ :;; :;;
ro d) = ~ ~
o..VJ -<: '" '" '" Ci -ci -g
.- <::: <::: <::: >
VJ S = :;; 05 05
0 0 0 0
'" -ci ~ ~
I ...... u ." ." ." :;; :;;
~ c @ = >
~ ~ ~ 05 CJ CJ
~
~ 8 c = ~ c c
" 0 0 ~ u u
- ~ ~ ~ ." ."
::;: ::;: ::;: '0 '0 '0
u CJ CJ
}, c-i M "" 'n -0
,;
>
iii
S
'"
(!)
C
'"
."
'0
(!)
'P^IS Ja!llO:l
..~
>< "5
on
~
8e
i~1lf ...
-.
.' ,
II
ii
'1
!I
W
il
j-lG'$i";
_~."P~)>t'
"""~
",;.,C"_,,',0"~,,,,{<S1'I'~~
"0"0
!: o::l
o::l 0
"Ocr:::
<l) ~
t) <l)
~ "u
o.q.;:::
S <l)
......0
I
.,;
0::
"
"
iii
'"
o
E
.5
t'"
m""'","'-.ili'a,rd~"
'"
~
<l)
S
OIl
<l)
Vl
'P~ s!ea)t dwe:J
+
'" .,;
.;:
'" 0::
:!! Gi
CIl 5:
>
< i5
j'f~
6l'~'S
'P^IS sapelBJa^3
,;
>
iii
"
10
Cl
c
"
'tl
o
Cl
'P^IS Jamo:J
-
,
~)1l<'~""!li&~>~":J.i'$.~~t"
Ol '
'tl
12";
G)..Q:
c
ii:
SL-I
rac
.>
It'.l~
~
-I
~,
'aG
C)
N
0::
en
.....
-'-
'"
o
4070
1-75
2370
---J
U1
o
Daily Project Traffic Volumes
~' 8 C''''''''
.
"C
~
m
...
C1l
.-
-
-
o
o
Daily Project Traffic Volumes
Be
.....
.
o
c;
(\j'
Bonita
Beach Rd.
1180
Daily Project Traffic Volumes
BG '^=_
Appendix 21-2
Appendix 21-2 Contents
. Immokalee Rd. at 1-75 Ramps.........................................................1
. Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.........................................................33
. Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd..........................................................55
· Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd. .......................................................74
. Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd. ......................................................99
. Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd. ........................................................ 118
. Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. ................................................. 137
. 1st. St. S. (CR. 846) at Main St.(S.R. 29).......................................153
. Main St. (S.R. 29) at Ninth St. ..........................................................172
. Fifteenth St. (S.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr............................................185
. Fifteenth St. (S.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd. ......................................198
. Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd........................................................217
· Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance.................................................233
. Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.........................................................243
. Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29......................................................................256
. Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance ...........................................271
· Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.................................................284
. Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd. ....................................................303
. Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd. .........................................................316
7/1512004- 140113 Ve, 01!- GJONES
~.,
03786-()13-000-PTIS_28436
Be
.
.i
,;
.
c
"
0
u
.
~
0
C
.
E
.
>
0
E
rn
c
. E
1;; ;3
~ 0
.. E
e ~
.
rn "
'" .
E
2! . c
c :0 0
" -" u
0 '. '"
U > ~
2! .
III c ~
c 0
C- O ~ '.
E E "
. ;; .
'" ~ c .,
0:: '" <Xl 0> ::;; 0 " .9
'" 0 rn c 0
0 ai '" c g u ~
'0 '" '" N E 0
c ~ '0 c
" c c Ul
::J t- O . ll.
0 . U ~ .
,g 0> 0> E ~ E
v '" 0
.r: '" .... '" V '0 0 '0
- '" '" <Xl '" . ::> ~
::J N N ;; E
0 0 .
'"
II) m
~ ~ "'
It') V '" '" '" N <Xl '" '" "'
.... '" N <0 M <0 M '" ';:
..!. is is v 0 '" 0 <Xl ~ <Xl 0 "
- '" '" ~
'" ~
~
'0
0:: '" '" '"
'" .... .... '" ;;
Ql 0> '" ....
Ql ~ c
iii 0 0
0 ~
.
..II: .
0 ~ Ul
E '" '" .... N N .... '"
'" '" '" '" ~ '" V '" N ;;; '" .
V " .
E v N .. ll.
e
"
;;;
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c
c
..
.~
~
<;i
'i:
~
'5
-l!
.
'" '" .... N N .... 0
V
'" '" '" '" '" V '" N ;;; '"
V '" ~ N
rac
2
- ~ I
. ~ .
:::; ~ .....
Co.
c " '"
.."
~ C ~ I
5.2 ... ~ 0
3 ~
o~.2 o .
Ui/i ~'"
"
:x "'. " I . --------1
v 5 C 0 ;;
'" . ,- >
'" . o E 0 .
N ?- J:~:a E
" 111I1I1IIIII1
v 3 c ~
'" " c
'" (;.;2~
N U
. c -' t- '" -' t- '" -' t- '" -' t- '"
> . OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ
~ E z z z '" '" <n w w w ~ ~ ~
"
~
,
i t:
= !
8 -
~ii
05u8
c- ." ...
8 3
~ '\
,;
.
c
"
0
u
~
.
~
~
c
.
E
.
>
0
E
rn
c
."l "E
~ ;3
~ .
.. .,
~
e .
rn "
'" .
oS
~ . c
C :0 0
" -" u
0 'jij '"
U > ~
~ .
" c ~
. 0 jij
III E ~ "
. ;; .
c. >
0 E
E '" ::;; 0 .9
'" 0 '" ~ "': rn c ~
0 N c g
0:: '" .... ;;; E
'0 <n
'0 " C ll.
t- O
C . u .
::J E oS
.... N
0 :; '" <1; '" '0 '0
'"
.c '" .... '" 0
N N ~
.r: ~
1:: '" E
.
0 0:
Z .... 0 0 0 .... '" '" .... m
'" :> :> :> '" '" z
It') 0 N 0 0; 0 0 ... .,; ~
.... v is is is N .... '" V ';:
..!. '" '" '" "
- ~
~ ii ~
'" ~
'0 0> gj ~ u
:i '" '" ~ .
0:: 0> ;; . u.
.... c . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . c
Ql 0 0 . .. 0
0 0 OJ ~
Ql ~ .
iii .
~ Ul
..II: ~ '" '" <Xl '" '"
0 '" '" '" '" '" 0> ~ '" '" N '" ~ .
N '" '" V '" .
E ~ .. ..
.5 e
"
;;;
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c
c
..
U
't:
0
;;
'i:
~
'3
-l!
.
;;; 0
'" '" '" '"
N
. ~ .
~ ~ ';;J ..
c ~ '"
.."
]ls]~ II IIIII
~ ~~fH II IIIIII ~I
~ & ] j I1I111IIIIIII
.>' C ..J t- a:: ...J I- c:: ...l I- e::: ...J I- 0:::
o <ll r:o CO CO r!I en CO OJ CO a:l Q) r:o CO
:EE ZZZU)U)CI)WWW:S::S:~
I
"
~
,
I '
=
8 !
~'":\
.Ii
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Ramps
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
;:?f3
JJC\
1447=:
232~
~~
)
~
&
It::
o
ff1
t=617
r122 Immokalee
E.
~
to
(/)
J
396J
1513=:~
~
&
8
!;p
E.
'"
a:
c
o
to
Z
))('('
0.....
.....C")
C")(\j
"-360
t=428
1744=:
["8e
4
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
'BG
5
,,}
-
..
..
-
'-
....
t
I"
\.
~
.I
Lane Configurations A+
"'U'-\lr--il1~-tliWd;t'i4t:Uir'
,
Storage Length (It) 50 0 693 0 0 0 0 0
mt-I- .lll~@'''~t~-!i!ililfii\l!il;il':''''!ii'--:-l!l!i''~!~''''_,~~
, ,*,~"""""m'L'"l!'.~, If!llflilll.!,"_~~'iIIl , to", "
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
IPlL --"lIIIfIiIIL!!~_~ill_II-' llUlIiIW!lmllllt1l:_II~'iII~~._
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0
iv- '''dO '''-.IJl~II.&..!J'I'i~'T~'''-Il~'--.i1'~'II]II<-'~ ~"'l!'~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88
~- -__lr~J]]dIlDi~~~~_]rlllillt~J~~
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
...i Illrfllll'1lllllllll_~""t.ll~r- '-'~'--'''/ti~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes No
~~iIIIIIII""~' ,_.' "-'~~~p-~~'---
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
L- l~lllin1illlll11llllllllJlmillR!lM 111&] 1Ii!iI a'-'
Link Distance (It) 318 625 210 1021
HIlI 1III~._.I~111l .lIfltlllllliliIllJL_'.'"'' _.JIB -"'''liII -~---
Volume (vph) 0 1447 0 122 617 0 0 0 0 463 0 513
"'---.!iJlI'-'fulM"'.'.ii1]~!ii__.__''''''''-''''~-_'"'''''--'~~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1573 0 133 671 0 0 0 0 503 0 558
, ._1IJ1ilI1.U."_ffililllll''!I!llilllllll!l~tllll1_
Turn Type Prot Prot custom
SJi
'//1,
Permitted Phases
.~I~1111f1r-'" [u I II
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
"1 \ 1\~~l!lIlIIlJ'"-'liIll~__./-I-'--- 1.1III---'--'IIl~-- M!a
Total Split (s) 0.0 36.0 0.0 14.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0
_--''~'iliIlllilllr~:lL., i' '''V-~~I'''I!lL.
Maximum Green (s) 32.0 10.0 46.0 16.0 16.0
-" j."II..lnn_~___.~I.lml'T_~, I _ dill
All-Red Time (s) 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
11M' lIHII"""'"....lII~iml~~IF'i_d_~~I_~
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
1IlIIIIIIPIl~'~I_~~'''~~---'(''.illlm~''~''''illlllll:1r' 'Illli!
Recall Mode None None None C.Max C-Max
._"~- F~_IIIt~;g~~_&_=-<-_IIIIr~IIIIIIF'.J'll~__
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
--_"'iill___dt'"'!ItJi1dt""%II_:lIfl"'Ui' - . '_ill<'"
_~~~?1yJill8m;;~%i~. '~~~
Act Elfcl Green (s) 32.0 10.0 43.2 18.8 18.8
__.l1illiiiIC,,,r. ..~, .,.IIIt_'jjiJji!l.lil!f'''''''I~1
vlc Ratio 0.97 0.53 0.31 0.55 0.75
WilsonMiller. Inc.
raG
".~
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
..!'
6
-
"'\-
.('"
-
'-
'\
t
/'
\.
+
-cI
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
---~~-.
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
Max
Max Hold
Coord
Coord
50th %ile Term Code
Max
Max Hold
Coord
Coord
Coord
#496
118
o
148
#226
Tum Bay Length (ft)
693
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 70
Offset 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
~!jt'-
Intersection Signal Delay: 27.7 Intersection LOS: C
... .. '" ---~!illit_~~I!lll~..JIIIIIIIIII
Analysis Period (min) 15
~- ~~amllWiI~~lI[~rrr11[I'lIlI-!![J--
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~ ~oo "....
5: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & SB On Ramp
1:
,
,J ''('". ,.3
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
rac
7
..J
-+
"
-("
-
.......
.......
t
r
'-.".
~
.;
Storage Length (It)
743
o 50
o
o
o
o
o
Total Lost Time (s)
~o ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O 4~ ~O ~O ~O
-
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00
.1lt-dIlBJ[lllU.___1111 II
0.950
I~ 1!lJJIIiIL'-f:l!J r - c~1 ~
0.950 0.950
- r'''- "IIJI~'" - .....,.... ;lIJE--~ ..
Yes Yes No Yes
r' ~~-~-IilW!ll&iI_-
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
· '--':PJ'- liIIlBl lEDIiIIiil'Brll['
625 281 321 291
- _1111_1lI.ln! m,llIf.-__~\~\~~ m~ If I
396 1513 0 0 428 0 310 0 231 0 0 0
, , "r~"--B--""""''''
337 0 251 0 0 0
~_~ I
Prot custom
.In~n IIiIPlP!lrTUI-_
Permitted Phases
RIlllll _. _,11:]1- __ --.tll_____lllilllillr ~I
Minimum Initial (5) 10.0 10.0 10.0
~- __~ r......._lII 1111lli
Total Split (s) 19.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~, _IBIIlIW~IIIi~1:_~lI:l~_IIIII~I"'''' -1
Maximum Green (s) 15.0 44.0 25.0 18.0 18.0
_ JillIBlLqj",' .
AII.Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
II '_II_"B_~J'sIlIIIJ_~~:llIIIIlII1l_~_~~_-dIlIII~mlllllllil
Lead-~ag Optimize? Yes " "'-"", Yes
0.97
0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
---.llf.ftlIIJIIIJI ,"
, .'rIl---' ·
0.950
Adj. Flow (vph)
430 1645
o
o
Turn Type
Prot
i_11111
1'1
;w
"-'~
C-Max
:iliIIiil~"__'~'~]lIi
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
r-F-w-mllllilBlJjlt_'''-::.1 .1iI'~~~'!II!_j _
Act Elfct Green (s) 23,5 44.0 16.5 18.0 18.0
"", l'!r"-,"'" fi"''-,', '", ."'. "':lri'I--iO.lk._'1l011.l:4&~:~:l$';:~il'~"il',Mii!''''ijfl'liIiI_!!€''\'B''li~~__'I!liii!!tiSmlJEBim_iSlli@!1
~.~~,",i$J~~:mt@h'''''''i2",:''"",,:WAm~s~m~~~iS*,1lllficlt., "' ,,'M~Il:~.ii01#%~~0b!\;fiPJtD1~iitL~!f&llij~
vie Ratio 0.37 0.74 0.56 0.38 0.35
Recall Mode
WilsonMiller. Inc.
rac
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
8
.". "'" -f' 4- "- '\ t I" ,.", + .,;
-...
70th %i1e Term Code
Hold Max
Min
Coord
Coord
50th %lle Term Code
Hold Max
Min
Coord
Coord
30th %ile Term Code
Hold Max
Min
Coord
Coord
10th %ile Term Code Hold Max Min Coord Coord
_._-----,,~-~
Queue Length 95th (It) m57 m50 132 96 83
.
Turn Bay Length (It) 743
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 70
- I _ll!i'~ilIiII~ -r---"*_~ "1- III.
Offset: 1 (1 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated.Coordinated
~~11~1
Intersection Signal Delay: 10.9 Intersection LOS: B
1111111--",."_" '
Analysis Period (min) 15
1 -''''_.~II_iIIIllI~lIIlIlx~'-I!II1IT1rlllllllllll
~;"' '"'""
8: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & NB On Ramp
~:
1l/7
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
"
~.
BC
9
N ~ ~! .., ;:: <1\1
.... .., N
0 0 <0 .... 01 '" <Xl'
;; ;; N;
is is
" "
0
"I: r--a ("J; 8:
.. '<1",
C ~; ("'),
.. N'
U
II)
..
"I:
III .. 1"-1 mi coj
C. :;; ~, ~, 0'
E ~! ml ....,
.. C"i' (")1
.. >
II:: <l:
'tJ ..c: 0: 81 01
c - 0: 0;
::> ;: ~-j <0' :Jl 0
0 C'il " .
.c -' v' ~1 ~ C
...
..c: ... ;- , ~
'" 0 E
- Cl u .
::J N . ~ '"
0 . 0 m
VI g U 0: . 00
. 0 ~ c ~
II> '" m! en! m1 " " " , ~
> n: " 0 0
.... '" rot co, 00; U
ci Ot oj ci' c ;- '1i .
....!. . . '" "' ~ 00
, E '~ '. . ~
. 0:
'tJ c .. 0 ~ E ~
II:: ~! ,....t g! m c U u ,
~, .. "" . 0 ~ "-
03; "" . B " ~
.. r--! r--:! .0; 0 c n: ~ '1i
.. ...-, '<I"j "t! 'lij IJ .., "'
. 0
iii " -~ c I .
" , N E
'" .. . e m ~ ,
-. " 0 .
0 :?- ~ 0 'l' 0 . ~
E " 0 " "-
"' "' . . '" ~ ~
E m . u
Co~ " " " ~ ;, .
("); 0')1 ;- ;- ;- 0
...-, "" "" ::> ::> -. 0 0 "
<0, co; 01;, "' 00 l5 "' :1 !- 0
-~ Mj ~ ~ ;- "- ""
~ ~ 5: '1: € € C
;;
.
l5
cnl ~j ;~! z
co,
-' IIlj
u .
. '" E
'0' '2 .
;; 0: E
N .
.= >
:;: 0
"
u '" ;g
c ;;;
.. '" E
0 , .
0: >
t- o
"
, ] E ~
0 " '" . "
I E E .
0 ~ :;, ~ . 15
N . ~ > ,!:: .
u 0
~ on 101 .., - 0>
V Nt N .... <0
... ... ...., ~ - 0>
f'il
N g1 '"
0> ,.
.....1
L
l
~
I ~
M
...t\:;:
w ~ ~1 f3! ~
00 ~ w
e ~ ~ ~ ..-j ~
> N"j
is is is ;
" " "
'" vi I"-~
0 ..., ~:
'" <0,
C\lj .......-:
III '" <:oi ..,.:
Q, 0 0, Sli
'" 1"-;
E M' 6j
...
0::
'0 0 81 0:
C 0 0;
::l '" (')j Ni 0
0 oi 01 rii IE "
v' ~, .
J:l ;= c
,
..: :>- 0 ~
1:: . 0
0 . 0 . '"
.
Z E " 0: . ~
, . 0 ~ c z
It) 0> 0> 0>, ml :g 2 ~ , ~
00 00 OX); co, ~ 0
.... 0 0 oj cij .. ... 0 ~
..!. C .. :>- 0. .
. "' w
E . '. . .
'tl c ~ 0 u. . 0: w
~ .. E ~
0:: 0 ..-1 ~j ~ c " 0 ,
0 0; "' . 0 :g a.
., ~ ~j ~~ 0 . 2 "
., oi to, co, IE c a. ~ 0.
'<tj ~, 0 ~ "'
C;; . N . 0
... " , c J: .
"" c , N E
.. . '> e ~ ~ ,
0 '0 .. ~ 0 . :g
E !!!. 0 ~ 0; .
... IE 0 " a.
"' "' . '" ~ ~
.E . 00 . 0
" " ... ~ " .
... ... ... 2
::> ::> .. 0 0 ~
"' "' ~ "' :l . ~
u. u. a. ... "'
- ~ € ~ ;;;: ;;;: E
;;
..
0
z
.. ~ _! ,..,; 0
.. ~ ~J ....' w
w ....' ..
N!
~! LO; w
~! 00
"",
"BG
10
! !
j ~
; ,
, ,
! '
!l!
"08
raG
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
/- ........ "
12
..
-
'-
"
t
,.,..
\,.
+
.'
Lane Uti!. Factor
1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88
d)nM
Fit Protected
0,950
0.950
, - -"'
Fit Permitted 0.950
~~,
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
" '~~"PIIlIJ18"""~_'." ..-
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.950
Yes
-~.-...'"'
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
Link Distance (It) 318 625 210 1302
11II"1 _.._~~mllJjlfE' ...~___"I- lINn -JIIIIII'l]'II/l!r"'--'1I
Volume (vph) 0 2128 0 171 969 0 0 0 0 764 0 745
---IIIIB-I'!Il~~li~ft'~i_
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2313 0 186 1053 0 0 0 0 830 0 810
Turn Type
Prot
" P~ot
custom
Permitted Phases
,',*"
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
".- - -.JJI'll!j!i':~.~' "~..b ' '........
Total Split(s) 0.0 82.0 0.0 17.0 99.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.0 41.0
It_ III' "" "~,::iI!ll1a-~'~~
Maximum Green (s) 78.0 13.0 95.0 37"0 37.0
'" * ,. ~
, ",."~ ,
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5
'i',m," "
;'~"",,,,,.,dl!.
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
~_rlllIIll.aiIi\J~ ' "'PJl'llllllllllll
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
" '!\I!l!''filrr4i!1l_-_gg_~~___
"'0%l~~._~'Bllti~~..,. !}"~~M
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
----.._.IIlI&I_..._~~lIIII
Act Elfct Gre;n (s) 78.0 1~.0 95.0 37.0 37.0
. "
v/cRatio 1.17 1.13 0.44 0.92 1.10
.1~Dl~IIlIIIlll.;_Ii!H~~1t2li111--"--tl":r__ "d"
Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0.1 0.0 0.0
" r"'I!hj%@j'"fili&1&iI~'l';3ii1l'tl0t_4IMllj_li€_''''''_p"j!t1i!ffii_,ili.iiJ!j''___i\i
,__Htll'L",_".3j!_W_~______
LOS F F A E F
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
",
r BG
13
..J-
-
--..
.f
-
"
.....
t
/*"
\.
~
.'
'lItilllllill n!
Coord Coord
-'~-1-1f;'-' ... -'1
Coord Coord
1r-.III1.i'~- "'. -.....,
Coord Coord
Max Max Hold Coord Coord
.__..=-~....-. -..: '__.-7 r ..r illl 11II
Max Max Hold Coord Coord
'-ltlllil[l;i1Di' ""~~~"---"''''''~-'-'!wrll-~'' "
#1448 #357 142 #495
..'-__.11. -..- "1ilIIIIlI_~lI~'II~mrnn~.~
693
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o 311
o
o
Cycle Length: 140
",;-" ,.~", . ,---'-
Offset: 0 (O%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBL, Start of Green, Maste~ Intersection
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
~ -- "~[j'".' II"'...."I.~I.'" ,.. ......"'1ll1rr.nul-uqlr"~'.-1i-
Intersection Signal Delay: 85.8 Intersection LOS: F
~.. 1.1__lr"iMr..--'-'-.-!l.~"~~"" ',~'i.lllliill_lIrJl
Analysis Period (min) 15
-. -~-',"'-"'''~M~_iIlli''''''',''ii!''''''..'--JIIIl!mIf.~rTII_'~----''lIIr1lil''''''..'--' --'I
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
/I " i ~1f:M-"rrW-='rmrF""l'Iir"~lll""I\t"==~',,"frl=Tjf''''''''''-''"II'''Y-~111111_
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles_
[""'-
5: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) &
]:::
Jh~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
......
raG
l'
14
-
"')
.,
-
'-
'"
t
~
\.
+
.I
Storage length (ft)
p--- mlll_'" ,
T otallost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
0 0 0 0 0
lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00
~
. .
~ .. ~ u_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
Fit Permitted 6.950 0.950
.1_,_,~,.~-_lf!!lil't~~._
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes No Yes
, .~-"'''~~.lldll~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
m I ~I_~tll-~""""""'__
link Distance (ft) 625 281 321 291
- , . ~T ...._II~___~~_.~_
Volume (vph) 555 2321 0 0 777 0 116 0 86 0 0 0
- IIr--~----111111.~'-.'~~~r~~t"~ 'II
Adj. Flow (vph) 603 2523 0 0 845 0 126 0 93 0 0 0
Turn Type Prot Prot custom
-"IJI,.~_.I !Il.lIIIII_~~""'''1IlIIm !iI!
Permitted Phases
Minimum Initial (s) "
10.0 16.0
16.0
10,0
10.0
37.0 120.0 0.0 0.0 83.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.
Maximum Green (s) 33.0 116.0 79.0 16.0 16.0
- I.'_..~.'
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
I - i~___lI' '"':l
lead-lag Optimize ? Yes Yes
r- --'.'1 "." ,'" ..."...
Recall Mode None None None
UI ~1U__~'lBil_'::~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_w~"~'"1ili,hl?'_lll!C__'.miL_'i!."h211j@W14tf&-_.M-'cifrF0.__._2!i1''''''_~]i!!t~_qJi..._.
- mmD!!~j~~~~~~f'if,~illmt_Wt:~JJi~~~~~~x:l~t?m~_J
Act Elfct Green (s) 29.3 116.0 82.7 16.0 16.0
!IIi,.II .".--__lill_m_J~y,~,.h~ifi!!ih~....-@l--@l\lj'i'lI-~
gj_ -~~~~~r""-'!k'L;;g", ,.,,,,,<&&;~M@i0iJt~n~i_A'1jf4ft$!l!Wpl~lTI!l!t~D_,.,,!Z\~~
vlc Ratio 0,84 0.86 0.40 0.32 0.29
Wilson Miller. Inc.
~ BG
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
..J-
15
-
..
-("
-
-\..
....
t
~
\.
+
.;
III
..--I
30th 'Ioile Term Code Gap Max Hold Coord Coord
~.II.I.ltlllr"-----"I~~ w~iIlJiIm1!
10th %ile Term Code Gap Max Hold Coord Coord
~-III'-~"--V-illr'""'''''...''Ilii_Ull''''''''''''''''''''' ,_
Queue Length 95th (It) m237 m2 271 88 77
Turn Bay Length (It) 743
o 368
o
o
o
Starvation Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
~~
Offset: 137 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
~~-1'---"1
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.0 Intersection LOS: B
1_lrJllI~
Analysis Period (min) 15
1 ' . -"~-~'-'III--W.m_ilIi_~~ _Lit'~-""""-"m-'-~ThK'~~-
w--.
I.UIlllII.
-,~,' IlI::;H
Splits and Phases: 8: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & NB On Ramp
r~ f~ ,h
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Ramps
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
l.{)
'<:fcg
t=1714 J5t\
~
&
~
fJj
t=969
r1711mmokalee
2128=:
324~
~
'17)
E.
~
c
o
to
(/)
555~
2321---7
---7
~
&
It::
o
!;p
Be
,:j
,
16
E.
~
c
o
to
Z
~50
f-777
))('('
COco
..... co
.....
2407=:
j BG
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
17
..I'-
-
"'\-
.f
-
'-
....
t
/"
\.
+
,.I
J'_lf"'~~'.._Il!llJl.~d
Storage Length (ft) 50 0 693 0 0 0 0 0
~ 11~1~.IIII[il[I,..'w.l~_~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
tic 'ii!!l._
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88
- .,,-4i!j----!l:~__.1IliiIII1i!l,,!!i!l'''~'.-'11.IiliiKt-ti~il
.. fJli!l!~kW~~.,,,^. ".', "."dfill1tfYiL"jlSf1ii1L~~~~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
1!I11'~-"~'-'IllIF'''''''''=~_'''i_..w.?'''''''''''''"_''_'''''11!l;Jil''l'k'llli'Q'ii1ftillilWkli>:i1ili"'''=----.,1I>.."i7
_ J.!mi~lm;\IMMl__~M'1b~illL,~AU!!~~mB~,~.,x m~i;';..i!~
Fit Permilled 0.950 0.950
I .. 411'!l<1 17=~mat_i!fs..-"=y ~1~_IiIi1...g.~'1
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes No
....- ._, '''''1 I r'J-"-~"1I. -'__~--w..-illIlII~II"llliili_
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
__.1 ---~-- -r-- II 1ftllllln WI..L",rr:II' r .~!1Il!l.ll..lIIl1l111.lj__
Link Distance (ft) 318 625 210 844
IlL. ll::r.~~] .---- 1!ili!!l~...lI!IIIWIIIlll11nm_
Volume (vph) 0 2128 0 171 969 0 0 0 0 764 0 745
mil, fi.. ~ _ .1""""'-.---.."_----"-iiiilillJlli!il-lfr~ -~_
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2313 0 186 1053 0 0 0 0 830 0 810
Prot Prot custom
-_Il~~ 11"-'1'1'11--", Wlllllrrrrrrlll.TflIIIIUlJi II'IB[ . -,
jJJll.... .. IIUII_~nImi11l.1 -TIlmJIIi~I.IIIII111- -. ..
16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
II .." --11IIl1U 1lllilllP -IIR]imlrlifllrTIIHllIAIll.ilU "~1lI .~''''t1
0.0 60.0 0.0 18.0 78.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.0 0.0 42.0
.. ---
Turn Type
IIll
Pennilled Phases
II
"'"
Minimum Initial (s)
;w=- iillllI!ltil!l
Total Split (s)
56.0 14.0 74.0 38.0 38.0
QJI_IIIlliilll:lilllllllltRllil1fl'''/r/"!I.IIIIJ II ~ __.l\1i~12jL.::::'..-~.
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
~ITTIlI1mIIllUJI2
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
None None None C.Max C-Max
_n-I_~fIlrmR'"!Eiil"~._rvr' "....: "'...-.
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
.....,..."',',.... -., "oz.""' '1'1.f__~--~
Act Effct Green (s) 56.0 14.0 74.0 38.0 38.0
.."--.....~FIIl'-..'"~-___..-~JiiI_-t.~_~
vie Ratio 0.97 0.90 0.48 0.76 0.92
~-......-IIlIlIII~.rIII__ilI_i_i'I.1.t!ll_~.4Ii.~
Queue Deiay 0..2 0.0 0.1 0,3 0.0
__--.-'R...-.....,~_~:_.IIIl~J.~l;ii__
LOS D FAD E
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
.J-
'aG
18
-
~
.f
-
'-
....
t
I" \,.. +
.I
90th %ile Tenn Code
70th %i1e Term Code
Max
,
Max
Max Max
Coord
Coord
Max Max
Coord
Coord
50th %i1e Tenn Code
Max
Max Hold
Coord
Coord
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord . Coord
~.....r~
10th %ile Tenn Code Max ^ Gap Hold Coord Coord
.',,"
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#758
m#247
41
373
#473
Turn Bay Length (ft)
693
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o 170
o
o
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
. '
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
" ". r '
Intersection Signal Delay: 40:} _, ^
Intersection LOS: D
Analysis Period (min) 15
II ~lilg~~r,,~'I:r--"~---8__,.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
l~~
["""-
5: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) &
1: ,r-
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'aG
19
/'
-+
,.
-("
-
"-
~
t
".
'"
~
.-'
Storage Length (Il)
743
o
50
o
o
o
o
o
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (Il)
o
o
o
o
o
1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00
Lane Util. Factor
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
~-"____~._-~~"""'i
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
iBl!jilll
~'...-.~. ..
.~
No Yes
Right Turn on Red
Yes
Yes
Headway Factor
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (Il)
625
281
321
291
Volume (vph)
555 2321
o
o 777
o 116
o
86
o
o
o
Adj. Flow (vph)
603 2523
o
o 845
o 126
o
93
o
o
o
Turn Type
Prot
Prot
custom
Permitted Phases
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
. ._11 Ilrilllil
Total Split (s) 58.0 99.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~""'lJI~"'_liUI.ll
Maximum Green (s) 54.0 95.0 37.0 17.0 17.0
~I.I I~'-~
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
,
""
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
~--'~~~~.'--n~-'--~_.~Ie_J~
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
.~..IJ_!!lii
Flash DontWalk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~'~_l1I!lll~',,"-,",,'t1l""frir~dlMP--__
Act Effct Green (s) 57.8 95.0 33.2 17.0 17.0
~~l 1-4~'m.. .1Lm11~~_._~.rUlir .1I:l_~,1IiII1lIIll!t
vlc Ratio 0.71 0.63 0.86 0.26 0.24
1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
..!'........ "
, Be
20
#
-
-\..
~
t
I" '" ~
.;
50th %i1e Term Code Hold Max
Gap
Coord
Coord
Coord
Coord
30th %ile Term Code Hold Max
10th %i1e Term Code Hold Max Gap Coord Coord
1__ ..._~~- Ll~~ i'M~ ";-1.
Queue Length 95th (It) m449 m71 390 75 65
_I!-~~
Turn Bay Length (It) 743
Starvation Cap Reductn 121 837
o
o
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 120
Analysis Period (min) 15
- ___~ilif'~._r---rn~l!!IIl1I- -,
Splits and Phases: 8: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & NB On Ramp
r'" 12: I ;,
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
.. .... M1 .. ;0 t--.l
... '" 01 ;;; <Jj
... '" ~, ~
N1 ~I
<O~ 1.01 01
''It: \0; , M!
~I I ~I
Ni .... *1 N ~, ,....1
0' '" ;;; 0::1: m~
<OJ '" ~,
0 0 ~,
:> :> ;
0 0
.. '"
III
C- o! en;
E 0:
r--.i ~! m;
III C'!.~ ~i
0:: ~; N!
'0
c
::J
0 oj ,-i co;
.c ...., wi ~;
.r: C'!.; t--.;
- '-j (Wi! <<il ~
::J E
0 .
0:
II) 0; 0; 01 u m
0: 0; 0; '" . "'
It') co, ...-; OJ; ~ C ~
.... M; ~~l "';1 t- " ';:
0
..!. '-1 ~l ~ u "
- '. ~ w
III . 0 . ~
E " '" . w
'0 " . u " C
" 'e- '" "
It: '" 0); 0>1 ad > ~ ~ 0
.. t- O
Ql <Xl co; 0); (X) , C " "-
0 01 d! cij ~ ~
Ql . '. '. Ul .
l E ~ . '"
iii c .. 0 "- E
m! 1.01 ;lj rn " U "
..II: '. c ,
0 ~! 1.0; .. .. . 0 " ll.
-, ~1 . 'Q ::;; >
E ~; <0= u c "- "-
~! VI '" 0 , Ul
E - N . " 0
'" " " c I .
c " .. E
.. . " e '" ~ "
<5 .. ~ 0 . :g
!'? u ~ " .
t- ,. U " ll.
Ul "' . '" ~ ~
, , ,,~^ ::;; ::;; ~ m - u
,...! t- ~ 5: .
'1.01 to t- t- ]i t- e
~, :'<t' '" ::> ::> 0 0 ~
~! ('\I: <Xl '" "' 0 Ul :;; . ~
lO! {~ "- "- t- a. t-
, ; - € ~ :!: € € E:
;;
."l
"i;t! 0
~ "ij) z
.. ~i '"
~ '"
0
u '" E
c 0
'" <: . "E E
~ ~ '0 .
0 ct ~ >
N t- o
'"
"
u '" ;;
c .
. 'c E
0 " .
ct ~ >
t- o
'"
" " _r::-
c c-
, ~ '" . .
0 0 c E '"
'" I 0, 'c o . .
<; ~ ~ > E
N 0 '" 0,_
_ll.
OJ
~
>. u u ~
:=4>:E:S:-
1t;'0' ra o!:::!..
act':::;
t-
'"
-
o
..
>...!II: >> Ul
~ ~ t: lC 0 "0
$: a.. g ~:: ~ ;:-
~(ij~~e-g-
....ocn3:t-l
t- _
w c
> .
~ E
.
I
"
r Be
.."Y!:"1I-
.
.' ,
21
____I
~ t- ~ ~ to- oc ~ t- ~ ~ to- oc
m 00 m 00 00 m 00 00 00 00 00 m
z z z ~ en en ~ w w ~ ~ ~
g
N .. Nj V "'
.. .. ",' .. ..
"' 11): .. ....
NI
....., '" '"
0; '" '"
M; ~
'ae
22
N 0> ~! v~ N
'" '" <0, V
0 0 0 '" N; ""'1 '"
;; ;; ;; C'i'
is is is
'" '" '"
0
III ';::
C. .. M 01 <O~
E c ~ ::1;i ~!
Ql
.. (J N: .....,
0:: II)
'0 ..
C ';::
::J .. '" o:::d ,....,
0 :E 0> (":I; :;)1
.c m;
.r: ell ("'j"' ...;, ~
1:: ~ u E
.
0 '" . 0:
Z .r: '" 0; 0: e c m
f- " Z
... '" 0; 0: 0
It') ~ wi .....; '" U ~
.... N N-l ail 'jij ~ ';:
..!. "#'j vi . 0 . ;;
... <0 E 13 u '" '" w
... , . :;; c ~
.. 0 a 'e- '" , w
> ~ ~ 0
'0 N .. f- U
It: en; c ,,- '" c. ~
'" 0> 0>; . Ul
E '. 'jij .
Ql '" '" co; co; ~ 0 . <<
0 ci 6! 61 c " u. E
Ql ~ 0 :;;
'. c 13 "
iii <{ <{ . 0 ~ lL
. 'e ::;;
..II: 0 v ~j " c C.
0 0 v '" 0 ll. ~ Ul
v 0 ~. . N . " 0
E N .; to; 1= 13 " c :r: .
c , N E
v to; . e .. '"
E " .. '> 0 . "
~ rn a
!'!. u ~ ci .
'" u " lL >
"' '" . . '" ~ ~
" ::;; 1= '" . u
\: ~ .
^'jQ:l t- t- t- e
;:;'1 ::> ::> $ 0 ~ ~
Ul '" 0 '" :l ~
o:! ~ ~ f- ll. <{
-j '" !'i: € ~ € is to:
"
.
"
z
l
.' Be
!
,,><~'~'
.
.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
24
..J-
-
'\0
of"
-
'-
.....
t
~
'-..
~
.J
o
Lane Util. Factor
1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88
Fit Protected
0.950
0.950
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
- __.._J '~'I"'~1IJ" ~I----"""--- '-: h~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes No
..D' ~ _.~~_IIII!UII~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
iI& 1ll11li1la1J1l]TIIBIIII 11_ 1II11iW~'llllll.liMll__IIIlIIIIIII'IiI1[~111 J
Link Distance (ft) 318 625 210 918
III !l~-- & ,/illIIIIIII'-~' ~r-~rn_1 I,
Volume (vph) 0 2103 0 181 1047 0 0 0 0 748 0 667
I ...,'U%'~__-~ 1It>""-"~"~-'''--- . 'II!
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2286 0 197 1138 0 0 0 0 813 0 725
~-----~_.
Turn Type Prot Prot custom
Permitted Phases
10.0
Maximum Green (s)
86.0
15.0 105.0
37.0
37.0
All-Red Time (s)
0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5
0.5
Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
1IIIIIIIIIIIIlI'I_-_.--__.llII"''''-'_
Flash DontWalk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Act Elfct Gree.n (s)
86.0
15.0 105.0
37.0 37.0
IIIIL_..____
v/cRatio 1.13 1.11 0.46 0.96 1.06
_~~-_~_1flIl.iIIfII:llBliD.lllltl___.
Queue Delay 3.7 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.0
iil- -,..... "'..., ' ". Bt. "'t ..: '" .
LOS F F A E F
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
--" - "\-
'BG
25
-('
-
'-
"
t
~ \. ~
.;
U!iI
F C
r""llBmllliI'Ilrr-lIl'-a
Max Max Max
- -~'~'~i4If '1"---1 ~
Max Max Max
!~.--illl~
Coord
'~-rilTjllllRll_I-~--
Coord
u
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Coord
~~- u ~iltlliitlL .""-...~ u
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold
IIftI . i 1Il._a1iil:".-"~ TIE
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
~~--.
Queue Length 95th (ft) #1483 #396 204 #539 #581
nil = - '! V--~.'"'.""""'~~''l- II W
Turn Bay Length (ft) 693
o
IJIIlIU _J 1
o
261
Starvation Cap Reductn 0
jil - I -~1I'r----
:;torage Cap Reductn 0
,-.
o
llmll' --If--
o
o
III
o
o
Cycle Length: 150
_---'II_~~'~-,.-PIIr""----,.,
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
i''''...C,,,,,,,
Intersection Signal Delay: 79.0 Intersection LOS: E
I...." "~III_II"'- '_-, ~ '!liII-- I'Wilil4'}r~
Analysis Period (min) 15
, ..,.. 'Wj!~_II""""&lIi'-- --'-"-"'iIl!l1.r-"--""_.--~'
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
" 'il__.;:'j-=~" ~""-"Tlllll~~liilf!"" Id""~---
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
h~~"' '".~.
5: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) &
,: ;-."
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
26
..J- -+ "\- if 4- "- ....., t I" '" '~ ../
o
o
o
o
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (fl)
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor
0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fit Protected
0.950
0.950
Fit Permitled 0.950
~ II>.. -11111I__""'- ' . IIII
Right Turn on Red Yes
0.950
11111____lIl'_ -.
Yes No Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
- I~'--~ nr-
Link Distance (fl) 625
II . __1llIJ . ~.IJII
Volume (vph) 589 2552
1.00 1.00
'[_1
291
~ill"!1!
82 0 0 0
640 2774
o
o 972
o 121
o
89
o
o
o
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
~ -_...._~~:~
Total Split (s) 41.0 130.0 0.0 0.0 89.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
37.0 126.0
85.0
16.0
16.0
Maximum Green (s)
0.5
0.5
0.5
Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
.. --.~~-~1lllBI'-~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
.. -u.DlIi~_ItI.llJr' j'(_I_:_~.~]- .:
Act Elfct Green (s) 32.6 126.0 89.4 16.0 16.0
~11.1I..II.';:::0ili-:.: .
vlc Ratio 0,86 0.93 0.46 0.33 0.30
i._. - -"Ir~_I~_""'_.'" JIIIII.'"
Queue Delay 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
-'--,,~ 0I1i!0",i&i';~r'f' "'P' : .".'if*"'JD&!it_1Am__il!~--'~
~~!~_At1j{bli"^_, '^ '''~ _ ~~"", ~~m~~~~~Bm
LOS EBB E E
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~8C
-
.
; ,
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
27
.} "'\- .('" - "- .... t !' .... + ../
-+
JJ: III"
liIIIilill.lll R~'HII U
Coord Coord
n'.._-1IIi1l1llllli--' I ._,
Coord Coord
Hold Coord Coord
10th %i1e Term Code
Gap Max Hold Coord Coord
~~_I.1Il11ri HITW'-T 'm _~
Gap Max Hold Coord Coord
--
30th %ile Term Code
o 226
o
o
o
Starvation Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
o 0
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 150
~-......--~
Offset: 14 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:, Start of Green
_I '-~~____ --"
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
~-~--"'__--~'''~''w'-~J ....Ill
Intersection Signal Delay: 27.1 Intersection LOS: C
III __~-'''[liI'iIf--.t'iV-~' ...
Analysis Period (min) 15
-'--_.~'-"i"_f"'!W____~- ~_',----'-.'i~lIlll.rlillE''"--'~I-~~
8: Immokaiee Rd (CR 846) & NB On Ramp
;-.8
~
WilsonMiller, Inc,
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Ramps
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"-CX)
f8'<:1-
1714 .)j,A:~
2103-7
-7
312~
d{:>
)
!
t5
fJ1
:=1047
r1811mmokalee
589~
2552-7
-7
E
&
It::
o
~
E
lU
ct
c
o
co
:z
')')('('
.....C\j
.....CX)
.....
'ae
28
'-795
:=894
2634=:
Be ' il-.'~'
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps 29
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"" - "\- of - '- ..... t I" \. + .I
"tt:"..''I!lIlIl1tIllI_~
Storage Length (It) 50 0 693 0 0 0 0 0
-1I.OCIIl.i!lilli'lli!l\III1lIl_&'1lIIIIl~.'~~--~\1!~~_~r~~'~""-!
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
.111I11~~__~_~.J!IlIIIl!iIl~~-- ___. III
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0
, -'YI'"'-.IT~'~"~"~' -"__.iJA_~a ]IFd..Il..IIIL II
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88
lB- Wll!Eei~'\l~_~E"''''
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
RlIIIBIIIIJIIII51IJ1- nl1~_~lIlII_~.,ill___J.]._
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes No
~,U. iII"r,-v-'lIlllnll.rr~nmn!rllllT-'~'mf" ~._ 11II
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.-___11 ilDllllliilllliJlU' --~. ~llmll!li__IIIII[l]II1l_iillllll If "_.41
Link Distance (It) 318 625 210 938
llll~ 11 ._' ....- '[.ir,~_ ~.Il.i.-'.-rqlll.--'~! ,
Volume (vph) 0 2103 0 181 1047 0 0 0 0 748 0 667
"-"-lIlIlIllIII_-""- "'''"--lI!Illllill!llM!iij'ili.iit''''''''--._-lliHi-,_
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2286 0 197 1138 0 0 0 0 813 0 725
_Iil!llJ1~!!m_!i:~~__lllIinc!.WJI~IWillllt"II___,.,_Ri..,_., ..lJ. IIll
Turn Type Prot Prot custom
.-....._~- lIl~.IIlIl1! 111 - -rnllllmlll..~~__~--~~Wv.lrmrn'-~-
Permitted Phases
lilli'll 111~:lIm_I,illl 1_1111 'UiI.'1~-JJIIIi '11l_-",II~I._llr!llJ
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
1Iil'iJ1a_.11I -"~~Iq"---_--~
Total Split (s) 0.0 51.0 0.0 16.0 67.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 33.0
~~-"'-'rd!!lll'!"i', I!lw.____
Maximum Green (s) 47.0 12.0 63.0 29.0 29.0
-..I_____-....-..-.jpllil'ii-._1l11ml.~-"'_ -1~..~\1I1
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
"~,' ~_.iK"~~
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
111~ilmml__'-'If-lllllliilll.-r'~~"'~~8--lfi,'lIpiillr-rm~
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
I '-l.l_II__w~JI il!~iIl._~~~ -ll
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_liB'.J!i1Jli___~liJ~_ill!IJil!fJ.....1IlIr1lli!llf1!lllil__;IiIIl!!I
Act Elfct Green (s) 47.0 12.0 63.0 29.0 29.0
1II~"""'I!IIIil~_""'~q;_I__I1'l'f~jWiglllhii~~iMft~~lft_-9b
. ....,"Jt~, . ., ~i#JiJ!. s",~OOL_.fjr~~_i<<~~
vlc Ratio 0.96 0.93 0.51 0.82 0.90
0.0
D
WilsonMilier, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Southbound Ramps
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
..!'
'aG
30
-
\-
'"
-
-\..
......
t
?' \. +
.;
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
III .- -- JIII_~~.~~-i-'~~~~ --
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
~JI!
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
,
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Coord Coord
~1Il~-~ ill
Queue Length 95th (ft) #628 m#183 m72 321 #369
1- '~___T~
Turn Bay Length (ft) 693
o
o
o
o
o
Storage Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 100
~--~,.--oo""
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2: and 6:SBL, Start of Green, Master Intersection
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Intersection Signal Delay: 34.7 Intersection LOS: C
l~L -- !IIIIIiI__U"'_~IIII"Il!If!I!--~.-Z::11lJ11ll
Analysis Period (min) 15
c ~~~-~-~w__."'C;:r
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
-~-~"-'lBI~lIliT.-~.],[1I
["" ,-
" ,mm""f: (C' .." , " "" ',m,
"~
~
J~.3
Wilson Miller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
raG
31
.J-
-
...
..
-
'-
~
t
I'"
\.
~
..,;
Storage Length (ft) 743 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
" ""11I0 "
~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
.
0 0
k_'~~~.",
I~__m~'
1M I ~~
91(''1i-
Yes No
- . .,-,V-'
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
281
321
-"'lIS_ !IIIIIf'-~~
o 111 0 82
, "~1
291
-iii
o 0
o
894
Adj. Flow (vph)
o 121 0 89 0
".."--_._-~ -,..
Turn Type Prot Prot custom
---~I!~
Permitted Phases
640 2774
o
o
972
o
UJ
o
,
Maximum Green (s)
;!i,S ~
41,0 75.0
10.0 10.0
-lIlIIIJIiIIIIlIi!llJlL~I_1 -\II
0.0 21.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
'~ "",JIllIl_~
30.0 17.0 17.0
10.0 16.0
1II11.1:11D1_-
45.0 79.0 0.0 0.0
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
~,.'.""!m~I_.I_IIH_IEr
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
D'-iIII~III~.IIIIIII.f"'~-~_~_
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max
~-~~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_llIIiIlIIrw_-~"-0i!jI1'-fi'-'_!!lIi'__~_-'il~i8:Y~__T,"lIS~
Act Effct Green (s) 41.6 75.0 29.4 17,0 17.0
__1_, ,,-9!l!1!l!i1lil' ,. ':"'i%J_"'mttl'till474,'~_9lil_ii?.il"~__,'" .,m, '1- ,
~ ~A~%f'--,lt~ ",._...",~~iE.Q~4!lu"i~~~_
vlc Ratio 0.87 0.73 0.93 0.21 0.19
0.5
Il_", _iIk"*,,,,,,,,JIII,,_,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
lac
Immokalee Rd at 1-75 Northbound Ramps
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
..J-
32
-
'"
of
-
'-
""
t
I'
\.
+
.,;
D
Max
Coord
Coord
Coord Coord
50th %i1e Term Code
Max Max
Max
Coord
Coord
30th %;Ie Term Code
Hold Max
,
Max
"MP,
Coord
Coord
10th %ile Term Code Hold Max Gap Coord Coord
.r~~_~___-'-'ir liB
Queue Length 95th (ft) m392 m38 #436 60 52
".IIlIIIB~
.
Cycle Length: 1 00
Offset: 0 (0%), Heferenced to phase 2:NBL and ,~:, Start of Green
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.6
w" ',,,",.
Analysis Period (min),15
"'t"
'" ,''" y 1
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
r~
Splits and Phases: 8: Immokalee Hd (CH 846) & NB On Hamp
~..,'..'.,"'!,.,
III'i ,
.,f-.,
~8
lR/..!- .7
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
fac
34
~
" ~ ~ 0 .
'" ;i " "
;;\ ,
M ~ 8
.
.
.
~
.
M ~ m E
~ .
:" ~ ~ ;:\ >
~ ~
N N E
~
c
$ 'E
. ~
~ E
'C ~ ~ ~ m 0 M ~ ~ ~ M ~
" .. ~ '" " '" ~ .
;: ;! " ;; ..; ~
~ M ~ ~ " E
~ . c
" 0
. i 0
" > ~
~ . .
c ~
m 0 ~ ~ c Jl
'ti ~ ~ . '.
M ~ ~ E ~ ~
> ~ ~ .
iii 0 " .
" . , E
"' ~ c 8 ~
c ,g 0
01 'E :g c w
.l< , . ~
'" ~ 0
0 ~ m ~ ~ ;; ~ :; ~ ~ " 'j .
;: ~ ~ ~ W M ;;; .
N ~ N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ .
- .
'" " ,2 0
~ , " 1i
~ '" *
01
01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ii 0 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0;
.l<
0
E
,g .
"
.
~
c
~
.
.
l 0
~
.
~ .
. ~
0
;: ~ m ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ :; ~ ~ "
~ ~ ~ ~ M ~
N N ~ N N ~ ..
,
C
C
..
0
.
0
,;
X
..
~
.
C
8G
.'.1 i!IMIII."
, *'$i
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
36
,,}
-
't
f""
-
'-
'\
t
/'"
\.
+
./
Storage Length (ft)
200
200 200
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~I""'-'-l. II-'I~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I , , ,1llIiiI!.t.1t! .... 11M ~-Il -11I1 IIP"'"- tl-lll
Lane Uti!. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_l11DII-----,.. __JIII.~!iI:~lIl DIDIIUIIIIIIIIlII11II
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
11I_ I'i__~_r --1lI1111.III~T~1I1D1__.' I -liR_
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.591 0.302
-"u -1IlIIlIIIIr--~~~- n~ilm-IIiI-~'-IIIIIII_I--Ng;'I'_
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
IIIIII!IIIIIIII j'---I_~-"-~T~ ______D~1i1T-
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-llIllIlIIJIIIf~ "~Ii" ~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
Volume (vph) 256 851 237 241 815 48 283 71 285 109 66 15
__~llllIl\'!ilpllf.--'-~P_~-V"
Adj. Flow (vph) 278 925 258 262 886 52 308 77 310 118 72 16
~,~~--
Turn Type ~rot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt , pm+pt
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
7.0 10.0
Total Split (s) 14.5 25.0 25.0 17.0 27.5 27.5 15.0 26.5
I' '1JJ1111iIi L""."LJ111'!?ID:fi_I,
I !L ~B'!IJ
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 19.0 19.0 12.5 21.5 21.5 10.5 20.5
11~--"-'-"'-I~I._~~I..lI
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.~
0.0 11.5 23.0 0.0
7.0 17.0
'm'~.lII.IJ_
1.0 2.0
^ +
. .,,,, ..,~: .Iiffi
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
l'IiII 111_ '~....lIl~ J~lIIl'IfIiIIIII!
Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None Max
'__liFiliI!._ ','!- -,
II !~~f;r
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11,0 11.0
Iii"" .M1lIMIf____~-.~_lIIIIIIIlII11IIlIIIIlnll..1I
Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 21.0 21.0 13.0 23.5 23.5 33.6 24.8 26.6 19.0
'"' I 1_.~A."'..II.~tIIIIIIIIIi
v/cRatio 0.62 1.00 0.43 0.91 0.85 0.10 0.56 0.57 0.40 0.20
r -_.......II!!!ilm_I_JlL~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11II '1"""'~I~-"JJII"'~'l!!I!$Y:r'Il>;*~I'H!~_"_'IR7iO._~lIlL_'r'__.
~__ '.!!i!(I!I",,__4M!~J.Jgr$&i3!'ill1BBBM!1ill]ft;;r6?'"iL.;...",,!dRL~Sf,]1i1Ul~m~mm~WEr~~;;# . .'
LOS D E A E D A C B 8" C
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
..!-
'I Be
37
-
l-
..
-
,
"
t
/'" \.
+
../
Cycle Length: 80
n- -
Natural Cycle: 80
~'--%~--l1lr~"C<~"-~~'%'~'-lIIi%-~:.".~'.
.
"0""/ '
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.00
.~~~.
fI -
~
iii:
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D
II -111.I' nlll-- 'M -""'-""""""'~1JlIlIIIiilIlI~~-' .-- .'~~
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 80
1iIIr~~ - --~-~ru'--llIiiiil-'~'--IlI':"'lIi1ili_""':jjl".rll.lI1!lruk~
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
....'c..>
',' "'''''>iV'' ~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 84e) & Oakes Blvd.
~:~~.
=:1 ", .3
:'*/L ..1-".7
,::
11:"
-
:3
Wilson Miller, Inc,
BG
.'
38
,
,
,
! ;
I-I
~h
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
"J- _ ..
r 8 G
40
,('" ......... '- '" t r \. t .;
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
u u u u u u u u u u u u
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
___'-_-'11 1!liI~~1l
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
In.~~ Jlllil~j ~"I illlUIl 1111"--'__
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
.. III11l i~I[IR.~._" -, 'if. . _-_i!!'r-~~~ -1llf1ill .11
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.4 79 0.200
-- nfU IHlIII~ ~ JIll _[HIi'll f~ j j IL ,- ""lInllll.mlll..~~1IIl
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~ ---------
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
- -- -II_~_JI _... II ~.- 1111110 ~~ ,-
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
-III ----._ I IdIIIL r- 11IIIi'~~ I
Volume (vph) 415 1582 384 356 1386 72 324 81 328 140 83 19
~~~-~
Adj. Flow (vph) 451 1720 417 387 1507 78 352 88 357 152 90 21
Prot
Free Prot
Perm pm+pl
pm+pt
Turn Type
Permitted Phases
Free
8
2
6
7.0 10.0
Act Effct Green (s)
'. .
TotaISplit(s) 24.660.0 0,030.065.465.4 16.0 28.5 0.011.524.0 0.0
_II -'QlllmTII"~"" ". ,.
Maximum Green (s) 20.1 54.0 25.5 59.4 59.4 11.5 22.5 7.0 18.0
,-- _JI____rII1ll11 '---1RiI._~.t:_1
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
---..-~......
Lead.Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
!Il1l1ll~ 1'_--,..!I.........!II-lI~~IIJIlIl!I!III_
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max
.n ~ ~I~I -~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0
,-- ".".~..__...
20.1 56.0 130.0 26.0 61.9 61.9 36.0 24.5 27.5 20.0
"',:~~~_II1fIl:
0.85 1.13 0.26 1.09 0.89 0.10 1.07 1.06 0.95 0.39
11iJ_._R!OOl~_I.IIIl_fll~_".,_n'i!ii___:'"
J/lIMf.",~~--~ JWI!!'L_~!~P,J;lli~~,llit~~Wl1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1JIIIIII\!IIl__I~IIIIIIIIlII!l!il!_
E F A FDA F F F D
vlc Ratio
I' -1111111
Queue Delay
11II111 __..~Il
LOS
WilsonMiller, Inc,
J8C
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
41
"J
-
'\-
"
-
'-
~
t
I'
\.
+
.,;
Approach LOS E 0 F E
~~~~"'-~~---~.
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
:~r -- !D~.I _I__
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
-
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Max MaxR
Queue Length 95th (It) #270 #1021 0 #567 714 43 #523 #524
Turn Bay Length (It) 200 200 200 200 200
~tarvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Max MaxR
Max MaxR
#216 139
200
o 0
o 0
Cycle Length: 130
't: ' -~.'~ '"-,,.
Natural Cycle: 130
TiT.'U@'~! ' '"",.,-- .
Ir""~- iOilif".' ..,'.' , ._~.
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.13
Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.0% ICU Level of Service H
~'~---r-~-' il]:r~.~--__
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 130
M'lliIl- -- -'-I!II(- -".,m..'^"-'i": ~""'''ln''-~r"[ll----''.'"r--.
5,Qth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 130.
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 130
~~-~---
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
I "'.-
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
b"~
.5~ 106
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Oakes Blvd.
:1f:: t ~
j
WilsonMiller, Inc,
Be
Immokalee Rd at Oakes Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
-0
>
III
II)
Q)
~
ro
Q')C")~ 0
~lC
~72
~
~1386
~356
~./ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
--.?"'^~
415=: 1f
1582--7 ~~oo
. NOON
)-0 C") C")
384~
Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
(/)
Q)
~
ro
o
. ,
42
Be ~\_,--~
.~~
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd. 43
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
",. -+ "'\- -I" - '- "' t I" \.. + .I
IL~:;~_nfi!llJratiOr1~ "",._~~~}jt"". ~J'..
~Bm!EfM_ ______
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200
:1M; -T~"0_;"",*''l-'T "'
,iM.,..,.
: ~R ,
~otal Lost Time ~(~)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
10-
--
__ L~
200 200 200 200 200
. ~1lIIII"_~r'tl1llll ~11II1Ii1l.
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
- WO'-- .,"- "Y' -!:ll/-
.
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_-----.4 ~.'..~__n'--~_
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
III ~'-~--~lIillllll_~IIiIIIiIIi!iWI~~1Il1llf11_1_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
p]r--~~i&r~_r.lrmB~"~!:lIl~"'rllll~if~:BIlIIIJ'!
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.531 0.220
I.. iBtllihr ---'P"w _IIIIW.-~ -11II1111IIIII-
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
.I"~-~' --~-rllllllill~ 1 ['''''Ill.''' .,--,-.",,- '-~~~I'~ 'II
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0~
Link Distance (It) 2684 2276 2084 2338
I.. N"~~c'v~I1_"llfII1[IWmlll 11111~i~JL -..-- 11I11111 ,,1111111_
Volume (vph) 415 1582 384 356 1386 72 324 81 328 140 83 19
-'--.-.....'I';lI!:lW*"._~ft_'_..........._.._-,...--w_~---~--.,"".-_' ~lli!i
Adj. Flow (vph) 451 1720 417 387 1507 78 352 88 357 152 90 21
I!IHI ~-__~I 1!IBlIIIIlI
~urn Type Prot Free Prot Perm pm+pt pm+pt
Permitted Phases
Free
8
2
6
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 10.0
-
Total Split (s) 20.4 37.0 0.0 25.8 42.4 42.4 15.0 25.7 0.0 11.5 22.2 0.0
___~~iBIi~.~i~_j_~
Maximum Green (s) 15.9 31.0 21.3 36.4 36.4 10.5 19.7 7.0 16.2
, . _...-m" -'..liIfillll.ll1l1llllllll
AII.RedTime(s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
k "" ,- ,...,
'.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
,'.'.' . ._"-lIIW]ii!iutriliP-~hl!l. .....9~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max
_.l:'\1;?;I_ii_........Wim....._~_'~""__~_1 _!ll__.._...._,_~
~~~aWi&:f11ffillZruil~fiw.._&m_IOO~&W_~~ ~~~~ ~~~_..~~
Flash Oont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~!fj1l!i;'~IIIIWIIIf-.-'___IIIIDT-'~':lri!llll!..1Il
Act Elfct Green (s) 16.0 33.0 100.0 21.8 38.8 38.8 32.7 21.7 25.7 18.2
, """' '~""T' .'~_l~~~~....III.~'1..1ii1li
vie Ratio 0.82 1.03 0.26 1.00 0.76 0.12 0.86 0.89 0.73 0.33
ii'_~,.'I1""#l!1'ir$$"__'!iJj'*"_Jii"~!_..,&'l!..~_lji~_'[!iJ_,t!lJl ,lI
~~P~~~Il!~BWAm~~ffJf_:iPi~~."";,<~~$fi:~~~rm1~J;Ar;~
Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.11l'iP,""-_m-iliPil..w""_-_iiilw;.~1Ii[.Jll""'-~1l-----'r11i11l1Jlil!l
, ~;gw~~2!N~"" ~!fIM..,V_.., '''' ..,~,,~Vi~~1_, ~,"_
LOS 0 E A F CADDO 0
WilsonMiller, Inc.
t Be
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
..J- ......... ")0:('" --\.. .....
44
t
/"
\. ~
./
Approach LOS D D D
<",.
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
~'IIIII~~.".--mlIlI!Rl_
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR
Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR
.
#526 0 #440 361 30 #345 #350 #139 108
200 200 200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IUIII. ...1
Cycle Length: 100
.1 1IIIft~'.~~~~~~~I!'fIIBIP"'. ~1IIIIIIIIIIII_~!Uf'~.""
Natural Cycle: 1 00
r~~JIlII"~_~.-',!7~1III'IDE_--. 1__~-IIII__II1'MD i[
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.03
. ~
Intersection Capacityytilization 95.8%
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 100
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 100
..,., ""
ICU Level of Service F
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 100
^^'""C,
Queue shown is maximum afte! two cycles.
Queue shown is maxi~um after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
b, "~.~
05 , ,l'"'06
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Oakes Blvd.
3i" ..t"
r' ..J- 07 ,08
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'0
.2:
to
III
..
..II:
...
o
-
...
-0
a:
Ql
Ql
iii
..II:
o
E
E
o
.;:
...
c:
Ql
<J
II)
...
.;:
...
:::iE
..
~
.r:
-
~
'"
....
o
N
'"
~
'"
N
ihU
0>0
:5 ~.: III
~ e E ~
a..~~
::;;
"
u '" 1:
<ll .: <ll
'0 = E
~ " .
.. " >
t- 0
:iE
'"
'"
N
~"
, 0 -
~5~~2
.:.=:~'EgE~-
~ ~ :; > .- !"::..
a..,,"I-~iil
'" ~w
'"
;;
N
~."
;:lC"'-
O:lUe
J: 0 "' Q)
.:x: ~ e E
rJ"::<: Q,:;::I
ClI (J 0.-
o..a!io;(g
;:!
'"
N
.:x: N U
I'll .... >0;
III jltl....-
a.. 0 $: I'll 0.0
J: .=-
'"
;;
N
."
C-
~:!.
0-
~t-
0>0
"'..
g"
",-
'"
;;
N
u.
(,)
o
::;;
."
c-
~,M
roO-
;: ~ t-
,~~
NU'"
roll.
'"
>. U u -
:: .~!E 0 ~
Ci e 2 ~ ~
..t- ;:
'"
'"
N
~~
~~g~(J~
;>0.. Ul"C t;:: G.l
0-1'3.:.::-....-
~ 2 Q (IJ ro "C <0-
1-0(/)~~g-
I- :> E.-
o,~
> c
o .
:iE E
..
'"
'"
<Xl
... ....
... ..
~ ~
'" "'
~ ~ ~l ~ ,...
(") ! v
~ ~ ~ :8! ~ ::
.... <<!..:.... ..
~,
.....,
oi
M'
to!
coj
I{");
~,
to ~ltO
Nj
CD 0 lOiN
~ :; ~J (0
.....1
I -
11r~
l.i
I
"'
...
....
'"
M
V.
'"
'"
N
."'it
0>
r--1
C"');
col
;
;
;
0>,
co;
01
~!
N!
6:
...-:
01
00;
rl
;;!
~,
~t
N!
~!
N-j
~,
-,
0);
v;
mj
ci1
~!
.....;
:R!
01
."
.....i
.0'
:e;
,
enj
it:u
COf
~i
o
~i
.....;
~~
,
0;
en,
0;
...,...j
'1:'"'1
i::01
0);
""
@. I- 0::' ..J
Z ~ CO 0) ~ 0:: ...J
Z (f) (/) ~ ffi
.... 0:: ..J I-
ea to CO c:c e:::
w w ;: ;: ~
~ ac
ooi .....
:8ioo
~,
,
r--.i
...,
."
.....-j
0,
0;
~!
'<ti
.
E "
" . U
"0 'E' ~
~ 0.. I-
IP <il ~
E ~ 'iij
& (ij [) u..
"ijj c: 0: ()
<( <C Q) 0
o Q) 2' ::2
!f: 5 0..
~ N
t-
]j
f'-
'"
"
t-
::>
"'
~
~
"
~ .5
w~
g.
"e
2",
~ .
:0:0
<(~~
~oE
g~2
::2(lg
o
'"
~
t-
~
'.
o
c.
" ,"'
en c: 0 Q)
o ~ :;I N I E
"* ~ ~ ~ ~ :J
CI) 0 ..:.: ci IV ~
~ !j: ~ ~ 0.. ..c:
~~~b!l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
45
2!
o
"
o
o
~
.
0:
.
11
i':
"
~
~
.
~
~
c.
Ul
.
E
"
'0
>
.
"
"
o
U
.
.
"'
~
..
"
2
o
z
_€!5:€ee:E
l
Be
46
Immokalee Rd at Oakes Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
"'C
>
co
II)
<D
..l<:
(tl
"'CO~ 0 ~7
"'~I~ :==1668
,A, \I ~415
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) ~ ,,/ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
-7'r~
471-7' 'If
1866~ (") CD '"
~ . -:t"COl[)
436~~ (") (")
co
II)
<D
..l<:
(tl
o
r 8e
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
47
/
-
").
f"
-
" '"
t
?
\.
!
~
~_-U~_~,:'
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
_"""'II8'._~~:mm~_1_1IlItIIifIl!f'1t"!tl_ll!?l!fillliBlr-.IIII_.!~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
jMMl''''' = ~1I1I111l11f~~1IIl1 Ilili_.III!ll!I_lIIIr~.-
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.l'iIftIllIIlII<i]I.r,~r~=-~~L...:rillillJ[ Till' -'--"~~il.!i"l: In[' _I
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_I JII: :i1illl1llll!l_~jlllP~11! ~~_jIf~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
IIIIIiIIliI._liIlUl!illlJIII!IfI~.~~~.I~I-'--
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.387 0.200
. "0 , _.JIII_~_lIllllr=.~~ml.1IIIIIII1 1-.III!IIIlIl"lI ~
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
I. nlllll 'i!~-~11lg~-~~~""'-J ---. 1II-. lJl-l il.llSUllllli
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (It) 2684 2276
_'..I~~.iIIllllJll.;w
Volume (vph) 471 1866 436 415 1668 87 343 86 352 167 98 22
~""1lMl.~
Adj. Flow (vph) 512 2028 474 451 1813 95 373 93 383 182 107 24
I 1lr~~_.II!IlP""._"-" III.l_._~.. _~- ~1
Turn Type Prot Free Prot Perm pm+pt pm+pt
~___t!ll~..- ~llIlll.~r:I'II1J1W 111.--'
Permitted Phases Free 8 2 6
_.:~-]jTlI~~mrn_""jll]lIll1nl _'~"lilllJ1I1rn.IIIIlII:"
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 7.0 10.0
__~"IIlIIIi'lil!,7;f-f_.~__JillI[.
Total Split (s) 25.1 69.0 0.0 34.0 77.9 77.9 23.0 34.0 0.0 13.0 24.0 0.0
_-''''~__Ji~!~iII1Jll:iSe''''iilJG:~--~~_liIi_n~~__J
~~ ,,= njWiilil,,,,,,^,i~~~R~a:4~1M(,~~~~^. .. . .~ J~~
Maximum Green (s) 20.6 63.0 29.5 71.9 71.9 18.5 28.0 8.5 18.0
_"'_~__,'_,,_il'11 -'I'f"iiillF'd~","Ii1'i;I6l-_~ 1"
~~~~. .l~"~!$jrd\~'f!ql!i!'!",,,~.
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
.lIIt 11111.,lr~~"'I.iill,Eltl"lI:IIBIli' .,"' i
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
1i~_"ilf__~i!lWJm_ll .1~1IIIIIIIiII.."mllIIIIi\JlIIIIIl'
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max
_,<IX .~. .. '"_ '''_ ' lL"1ll!!i..~_~'!i!.....,..F":JIJg0~,,,,,,,,,,.IIll'a_" _"-,,,_; _'~
~~.smmWU1!~~n~~~~211~%t~!~jf][G~~Q~iZE@j~_~ik "_;~w'
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~'-~~'~---"""'0""-""""'\=.,;J!rn""""'''''''''''''''''''''L"__;;Pm'.iJ!ilifli!0~'b_!iil.'--_0_
~~~~S&R_JB,~~UUtffi~P&j!f4fj%ii1if~~~__~I~~~:!!rmml~a
Act Elfct Green (s) 21.1 65.0 150.0 30.0 73.9 73.9 43.0 30.0 29.0 20.0
~_~li~.Il;~tI!:1'~"""';""" ''',
v/cRatio 1.06 1.32 0.30 1.27 1.04 0.12 1.10 1.11 1.17 0.53
. . ..alm__J!lI';{;:lii!l:SitIl!;a";'A"'iI1_""'~~;lli'l~'~I>"'"'I!lil_"":;ii_..m_li!i~Vii''''",Jf0_.,
~.%,.nq!fi~tIlH~iltlii1l;E,.:iltt .:~,~_J1lI,.;_",~~"MRit~"~1dWam&"""w~_WMl!~W~
Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~~1liIiIIIIIlIIII1~~.~._B!:;1.!jg___.._ii~'i,!li:J___
LOS F F A F E B F F F E
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
/' - ").
J Be
48
-(" - "- ~ t r .. * ./
Approach LOS F
1II-"~~1IBlII~jl___
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max
F F F
1IIIlIIIP""'_~.......-a
Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code
Max Max
- 1 - .
Max Max Max Max MaxR
Max MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
.
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
#401 #1478 0 #777 #1140 60 #502 #659 #320 189
,~, .
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
~ _.i!llIllIr I
Starvation CapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
.
0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 150
- --lllI-lf~lIt.mUU ._"'_'--~~
Natural Cycle: 150
-~~--...
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.32
i:"W
Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.4% ICU Level of Service H
-~.........~~
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
-....l~__llm~....f~I_'
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
"rxrlG !,",Rlil'__'~I~-'--'lB-l!'r~~jllf~'--~ --'"
1 oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
---~'i!Iil:' "...ili',
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
'(Ifi illlll1111i1 '-: ",", "
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Oakes Blvd.
:~: j!.~
J
WilsonMilier, Inc,
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
,,)--"). r-'
I B C
50
..... t !' \. + .,;
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ILl "_"':1<nnnW~,
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
- .I~~I~~~.~ m
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.435 0.216
- - __.~j_.-l_IIIIlJIIIB~~"lI li-.-.....<I(, J
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
----.-~~---
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~~
yolume (vph) 471 1866 436 415 1668 87 343 86 352 167 98 22
93 383 182 107 24
Prot Free Prot
Permitted Phases
Free
8
2
6
7.0 10.0
Total Split (s) 25.5 48.0 0.0 32.5 0.0 12.3 22.5 0.0
___llii.'1,_ rjft_'lIf~III1li\'b<~JI1rJlll-
~____.at~~~.,. .~J:B1fffi~, "
Maximum Green (s) 21.0 42.0 28.0 49.0 49.0 12,5 21.2 7.8 16.5
- l~_l\III__.~~I__-
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
e- 1I1111~iI:
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
.,- ___IiJlllllllllllllIII
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max None Max
_-' '__'I'L__L4r,___
eIi'- ,tMt;1il:1EWJj~~2fIJ&_1WfD~~~j
Flash DontWalk(s) 11,0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
ill i j .1Il"l!lr__~A.JlIl\III!iilli.ltl\lllJ.:_~Vrdll~diRIiIllmll'Jjn_
Act Elfct Green (s) 20.9 44.0 120.0 28.5 51.6 51.6 35.5 23.2 26.8 18.5
~Illfl ,. .!'I'__II_r_J<I~1j1.'''J4___''''lllllm".I\f",,'B
~ __i! liilll ,',.. _~u~ ..tiw~2L!M>tL%lliLM'd"~mw~BlB~
vlc Ratio 0.86 1.09 0.30 1.07 0.83 0.13 1.08 1.08 0.99 0.46
_!IIII._.~it~IIIIIIili__:'W'tlJi:,I"- -""I!I"
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
!I~_IlJllllllilllIl;Ii~__---r- _Jk~
LOS E F A F C A F F F D
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
1f!-'8C
,..
51
/
-
't
j'"
-
'-
~
t
~
\.
~
../
Approach LOS
E
90th %ile Term Code Max Max
rt-. -, ~,~_.--~
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max
D F E
"1IIl1l!'
Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
-""--""'--'-'x~_~
Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
- -'Y^^- ^ ,
50th %ile Term Code Max Max
Max Max Max Max MaxR
Max MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #279 #743 0 #593 518 46 #516 #524 #241 152
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 20.0 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~----~'--"....
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 120
... """'"lI5J __~~m_"'-T-.,"_mr-- 11ilr" '"'"_milirnT'llltr~mllll!lll!JI-"IillIll'~T- ' --.
Natural Cycle: 120
--- -'" -'-""'''''''--r[-----''----..' - --II'--"~lll~' IIij, -""--"~iiI '..-
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.09
Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.8% ICU Level of Service G
flU - '~.-l!lnlllln~IWIl' Illm1nlllllli
90th %lle Actuated Cycle: 120
._M' ~il'lRIIBlliIfl_~iIIi.ll II IiIIlm__ri,_._WI1IB'JElj!1-,r m';i~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 120
~-'lIillilllililif_'_~"""0"!lJ1j-'VI1~~Tllr-'iillii~
1 oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 120
-- -. -"""_lIl_f_lfi'HiIllIfj,ii1illl1lilliiB' m..lilluill~'~-""""~'%-'''inrjil'_H!I'"~''-"1I
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~""____If___
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
0"'
'^ w
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Oakes Blvd.
I'-"~~ ~.-~ r:M
~ .5 .,f;. 06 I /.7 .s
-
J
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
52
Immokalee Rd at Oakes Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"0
>
co
II)
Q)
r--. o~ ~ 87
N ex)(o
Nl'~ ~1668
\.l ~415
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) ~ ~ ~ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
-?1'-~
471~ '1f
---3> ("t') CD N
1866---3> . """ <Xl I.()
---3>"0 ("t') ("t')
436~
II)
Q)
..:.::
ell
o
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'aG
53
/
-
,.
.f
-
'-
'"
t
I"
\.
+
./
r ,,~ ~.~
''f__IE.liiI*~
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~, -eI1ll11lIlliia_--;t'tir"IIlIiII_I~1IliLJ1.. --~1',,_'~' "E
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0. ~,<2" 4.0 4.0 4.? 4.0 4.0_., 4.0 4.~. 4.0 4.0 4.0
R
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1- __ ~~"~-'..IIlIII.rll""iII- T il:.!IlIII'IIIIIl=!IIi"""
Lane Util. Factor 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-" ',. --4TI"'''~..IIli'iillrir'1'i\j~-;jjQffiilllfljr~roa!m,',.,''''''''.
~~~l%Wmil....._"~ilf_,,,.,_u_&~k,~~~~_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
liiI 1IllElI!._~__~' "r.ii1.11~"I!.
Fit Pennitted 0.950 0.950 0.516 0.217
i"w"'IIII~'-~i.ft(ti~~,'--~-'I'~~ll--_"'-_
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~--'-'~~~l__'-._
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1!IlII:lr-~---='.~~-"--"'-"~--_lPI'e~
Link Distance (It) 2684 2276 2084 2338
_I"
Volume (vph) 471 1866 436 415 1668 87 343 86 352 167 98
~il!il.---~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 512 2028 474 451 1813 95 373 93 383 182 107
_"f_~Il_ . .1 . ""_~r, ~
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Penn pm+pt pm+pt
j!jj ~.~'-"'--~."-I.lI!lIllP''"'''''''-__._I''~''''
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
1illii11lll"II!liiaWI~ 111111__.m.'
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 7.0 10.0
.".Jl.-W....lll~~--__~~
TotaISplit(s) 14.5 37.0 37.0 15.6 38.1 38.1 15.0 25.9 0.0 11.5 22.4 0.0
___..ll!rlli.J"___"lW_Il1!~
MaximumGreen(s) 10.0 31.0 31.0 11.1 32.1 32.1 10.5 19.9 7.0 16.4
lIilIRl:1 ~rw:~-!.III~'.IIt!liT-1.f1.lil"lilj'__-lJ<ill~&"I_~''''. "." "",., '" ...", "
_ ~Ml ~~i~\WJ,_~iJm.IlI.Bmtww^t'lBi~~~~x~MilliE!J'!!m!.$D;B~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2,0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
-"'-'JII. mi.._.~;.~1IIit".I_.rIn!m,lIDll_
Lead.Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
1JJIl..,___'" '. '~:]lllf~_'" m1J~n
Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None Max
_llIIII_.~~a$l~r!I,'.'IIIIIlIi!II',..I\i" 0 ":aJ0fi"M,,,,!__~--'qli/__
__""""""""~ ~,,,,,5E,,^1 ^^'.,1"iti ,."" '0.~~~~I1%_~""'"'iliml!l.Ili:Ii$~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_~Jtilli~.lJIl_~'--~"'~._lll111:_
AcIEffctGreen(s) 10.5 33.0 33.0 11.6 34.1 34.1 32.9 21.9 25.9 18.4
mIM!JI~-!I'~f&JiIJf"'lIiPJi'~_.7",~(~_W."i1di0l__Wij4k_""''!lit'''ilS'''i-itfs__W!if"'''''''''''
~_.""'_lI!!,I..",.~,,_!!!._,. ,,,"_"'\1f______ilI:a!0.__
vlc Ratio 0.88 1.09 0.59 1.02 0.94 0.15 0.83 0.85 0.79 0.35
-' .,., 1"'~lmi\!~.ilRl."'.Il!.II!l.'n'<!>Lil1_-iliiliiWJ!K~<i"l'lf:r~-J0.-it;i.rJ!!."'-j"-illfull.
tBd~w"wB~",)~tlJf!ll!$~",~,w'fJdf,lfA,^""*~~,, ,"" " ~a~~.,*,~!l~ISf""''''''''~~
Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-,' . ,~2.,j[&--~F.!tt''''"'ii'j%idM:''i'''l.ii>'*IIIiIll'!il.1'1i1l~.'!''aiJfi'i>ii!l~1I!~~,iJl0lf...:amgjli!!i-'.,jjTa17lf_a~
1t~~~:W"flQTY;!1ifffif1mifL!{~i58fL";"";fg,$LJW~~jgN!1~~~~!'1lmillMt\D~,,,,,~*,(A,,,JW,.A,,,,,rw~~~5tiFL~
WS E E A FDA D C D C
o 0
-I'~mB
1.00 1.00 1.00
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
..;-
. Be
54
-
't
.
-
'- .....
t
I'
\. ~
-.I
, ,~
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR
_....If~__'
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR
~-' ,~m
Max MaxR
Max MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
._!,-~-
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
~ "_~~6 "...
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR Max MaxR
,~ "1
Cycle Length: 90
__il~___~_F_llliM?liI~1iIl
~~~~~~~=~
Natural Cycle: 90
'_L~ilt__'!Jlli_I.._~'0
WfM~grrumfb:lmt~~!
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.09
- ,""",010('1 '&I1(;""';>"i1[:,', '
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service F
-___.4IlIIIIIIIIIIf..~.
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90
, . ..w_-_rrrniWAfillllllllfri_iliicl0lliiil."," 1'..
~~_.!l!1,,"~M'
'''''' /,
'02t
50th %i1e Actuate2 C~?le;9.o
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90
,"') ,=)X'c, ,
~g"~'" ,,,.,,,iUj><
~~it;:~~" ,y,
_)"~"t,'"'''"''
..,'......._-~11I11111
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
-, ., ~,
. "" "
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
~:~;.
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Oakes Blvd.
i: ...~:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
J
BG
56
~
.
'" m N 0 ~
,
<D .; " 6 0
<0 N 0
.
~
.
~
.
E
'" ~ ~ 0 ~
~ M ro 0
M M <0 M E
N N N m
C
~ ~
~ .
~ ~
N ~ M ~ ~ ~
" ro '" .. .
.; .; ;i " 6 .,; '" M <D 6 m ~
'" N ~ '" M .. ~ 2 .
'"
. . c
~ ~ 0
~ 11
0 '.
u > ~
~ .
c ~
m N c ,.
,; <0 . '.
;1: ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~
> ~ .. ~ .
iii 0 ~ '"
" . , B
.. m c 8 \:
~ c g 0
.~ ,; c 00
'0 c c ~
~ 0 .
U ~ ro 0 '" m . U ~ .
;! N ;! '" '" . "
~ ~ 0 0 <0 N
- ~ N N .. ~ .. m
.. * " ,Q .
,; 5 " .
0 ~ 0: *
0::
..
.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'ij 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
'"
0
E
.5 .
u
.
~
c
0
.
S .
.
~ 0
~
.
j .
~
;f m 0 '" m e
;! N ~ ;! ~ 0 0 <0 N "
ro ~ ~ N N ..
,
C
C
.,
~
0
"
"
"5
~
.
0
;
l
I-
.j
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
1 Be
58
/
-
l-
.
-
,
"'
t
/'"
\.
~
~
200
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor
-.
1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1-"I~il~IIIIM~__III1:IIM~ rn___imIillflll__
0.950 0.950 0.950 0.986
1IIIIrlll_IIIlL,,~_ Illf.1IIIl111 nl~RRr-~lllli ~
0.950 0.950 0.950 0.956
ill '1IIjJ~~____iI1l-~~
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fit Protected
Fit Permitted
11IIIII
Right Turn on Red
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
[__m.., .'.'l~~J~~IIIl..iIIl_
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
-
Volume (vph) 14 1058 700 205 269 2 591 14 844 2 1 4
l!J'"" ~mVf11-11JIjl
Adj. Flow (vph) 15 1150 761 223 292
2
842
15
917
2
1
4
I
Prot Free Prot Prot Free Perm
Permitted Phases Free Free 6
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
~
14.5 32.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 21.0 43.5 0.0 22.5 22.5
. .
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 26.0 10.0 26.0 16.5 37.5 16.5 16.5
Ii. II_~_ --~'lIJ_I___-l~~_
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
I - .llIf____.jll~_~1
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IJ:U "'~r II ~IIJI(_lI.,_.IIIIIIIlII_~DII~lIIlillJl1ln
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
, T""-IIIII.~lIIItllllir '.',: ,""',., . ~._~
Act Elfet Green (s) 10.5 28.0 90.0 10.5 39.6 17.0 39.5 90.0 18.5
~ [11iI!IIIIIII,1II1_~:I!UIII_.___"!
vie Ratio 0.08 1.04 0.48 0.56 0.19 0.99 0.02 0.58 0.02
~1Il IIILRII ___.11III!ltlIllL.....1l _ .,,,*
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
._.: i H~: UIIIIB11IRUI....IL,
LOS D E A D B E B A C
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~8G
.",' ,;"~.".
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
.,,'j
59
.J-
-+
'\-
t'"
-
'-
....
t
!'
\.
+
.,I
D C C C
'~~~--.--
Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
Ol tl~ T'~'--"" mil' r -'~'lm'" -~~~~~, 'B
Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
---_.~-- .~~- -III...'-.U - .. .""
Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code
MaxR MaxR
10th %i1e Term Code
MaxR MaxR
o
Storage Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-I~
~-~~~"~~'J11I11- ~'_.--~'~.r"'-'''"'''''~'I--~''ilI'''''T~r-.
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.04
111I i ill' rr"""- '-- "__~ff_'_. ,--~-,. Ir~- '~'-r'--"'J7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1 % ICU Level of Service C
~---'[I1ftll_~-~-1II~~1~..lIlllli-~1lII
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 90
__ll.I!'P'~[:f '-""i"'-r"'~'-ilII;1111li.iIIr"'''''~~'~mlIr-~-1?i
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 90
.-- """'" - "~""U,-,w.Im1[II"lIr.l.r.~!r=--'-'W'"~-"- ;~
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 90
.. ..
'__lIl1llltllif-IO',i"".'fr"".'.lIPllllI.-'
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~.~la"~lilillI.l_
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~: 3f:: :~:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
:! ~ ~ :! ~[ w ~ ffi~ ~
;:1; ;:: ~
C!.1 N ~,
0
~
n
~"
~ ~ coj ~, w .
~ ~j <'); s:C
" <OJ 0 . .
....., 0 .
~~~
~ . 0
0"'>
;:1; W ~J 101
N w,
~ .....i
'tJ oi 1;")1
>
m 0 0 01
~ 0 0 0; 0
~ ~ ~ ~i E .
.; 0); . E
'0 N N' ... ,
z, 0
(J '. 0
- c . ~
. .
CO E ~ '" . m
, . i! . E "
g e , ~
'tJ '" '" en, . ~ 0 .
a: w w ~i ~ " 0 .
ci ci 0; E . z, "- ~
.. . .~ '. 00
E . '"
.. 0 .. C ~ E
.. 0 oi '" 0 " 0 , .
0 JI <: . 0 .. ~
.... ;:1; '" ;;\1
0 N . '. " > '.
.; ~~ i! 0 ~ "-
E 0 , "'
N . N . ~ 0 .
.E ... li , , N I
0 ~
.. " 0 '" ~
.. .. 0 .
~ .; . ..
... ~ i! ~ " ~ >
"' "' . . '" ~ ~
'" . 0
" " ... ~ ... 3 .
... ... 2
=> => .. c 0 ~
00 "' " 00 ~ . ~
~ ~ ... ~ ... <:
~ " '" '!: e e E
.
2
0
z
:! 0 ~ ;! lt1i w ~ (')1 ~
N 0; ;:: ~ U);
0 M; .. ~,
...-,
~ en; N ~,
::: N! ~ 0;
C'>lj
rac
;,;.~
.
:' (f
60
~ ~
I,
, !
hi
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
J- ........ ') :(' -, '"
J Be
62
t
r \. +
~
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0
~-IU-
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95
000
-___I
1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95
00000
~'I-
0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.990
......11,1...._-.r -'_~~_d_
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.971
_ .t... -....--II~~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
..........~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
III ~l!-_~ --~_ ,~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
Volume (vph)
14 1305 718 435 563
3 593
14 1020
1 1
3
Adj. Flow (vph) 15 1418 780 473 612 3 645 15 1109 1 1 3
~i
Turn Type Pro! Free Prot Prot Free Perm
Permitted Phases
Free
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0 16.0
10.0 16.0
14.5 56.0 0.0 22.0 63.5
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 50.0 17.5 57.5 23.5 46.0 18.0' 18.0
----~-~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
~iL,...I-
Recall Mode None None None None
w
Yes
None Max
Yes Yes
Max Max
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
,. __...___ liT 'N'" " '..'lllllll!_
Act Elfct Green (s) 10.5 52.0 130.0 18.0 68.2 24.0 48.0 130.0 20.0
"'''''."--,,',-,,,'. ""'_~...Ii!'m~_-~--9W~,lli!iiBiiI'_Ktl_&IJi!
~!ldim~WM~~~~, ",..,J~, _~&_,,"" ""i\\}LIrJY~
vie Ratio 0.11 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.33 1.02 0.02 0.70 0.02
"'"" idIlIIIIII_.~, ","~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TIll --.!.1II1I!lllllllllBl__II~IIII..t_J.III~~_B"
LOS E E A F B F CAD
WilsonMiller, Inc.
/
~
-
'-
, a G
63
t ~ \. + ..;
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
-
\-
......
~~proach LOS
D
D
D
D
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
......--~..-~~
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Skip Max
Max Hold
Max MaxR
MaxR MaxR
Max
Max Hold
Max MaxR
MaxR MaxR
Turn Bay Length (ft)
200
200 200
200
200
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Storage Cap Reductn
Cycle Length: 130
iF ~~". ---,~-"jitj '. '111 Ilf r'1ITT.rll~~~~~~~~]r-'~'-
~atural Cycle: 130
--.'.' '--,
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1 % ICU Level of Service E
~-"--1I1__1i~~-'-_
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 130
l.~~ '-_lIIlil."~I. -1~_lIl~"'""-I '-n_
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 130
.~ - i r-~"~t-"A"._:il~~-~- --~_.",;",-_._~-~~ ~--'-"'T-il:
1 Oth %ile Actuated Cycle: 130
~-I~-"..._"'-~-r~.I~_Jlf.---";
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
. , "'H-"" .. ''':' ~.....iij'
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~: J~'; f:t:"
,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
fr Be
64
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
...--.
..-
L()
0>
0::
()
---
"0
>
co
L-
a>
8 ~3
('I) 1"- :=S63
~ ~435
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) ~" _ ~ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
/''---....
14~ ))! ('
1305---7 ('I) -q- 0
----? 0> ..- C'\l
718~ L() ~
0>
0::
()
---
"0
>
co
L-
a>
o
()
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
..J --+ ")- (" - -\.. .....
'aG
65
t
I" \. 1
.,,;
.~i~~~~~~fo
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
" '.- ;~Ii!;Ii~_._~IIIlI.jl'r~'. J .1:iillB
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
IS" lllmll!T---~-~-~m~%-~ JJflB]_.'-'IJ"'''''''''"''ll'' II
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~'< __JlIIIl.iIIBI---1IDr1l'mWlItl! Alllmfl.i_~.-'l
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_-"-"Il.....IIIiIIlIIliI_IIR.I.~liIl' '. , , ...~mmillllll.
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.990
!l!lllll U~V~!I;IID~.i~~~III?I.t..'~"'lII?o1.~l~~,wA 1'1
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.971
lllI1lQ 'liliH(~'-'-_]]__~__ _'l'II'Ii__mll.--- ...
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
_I_lill rr j[ fill i~~ . III
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~- ll"--~l.W_1II ~1II1111.I.llplf--1
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
1,......"-'iil'V_J.r~n ,1IIIIiIIII.....-"1111il _I'~" I"''''' II]IlIll1r" .., i -
Volume (vph) 14 1305 718 435 563 3 593 14 1020 1 1 3
~iA!!~~~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 15 1418 780 473 612 3 845 15 1109 1 1 3
_.~~lllilll#1 1,_OJ55...II1_JII1I6L ,A.__,_ --._J.. ._,
Turn Type Prot Free Prot Prot Free Perm
~19I__1[illl'!!.;~f"'II_.~
Permitted Phases Free Free 6
. ,. JV!IIIIJlir
10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
"t.w"~1I!I~_1II 11I1_1 -iiil!i'~--' - . _~ -~
14.5 29.0 0,0 17.0 31.5 0.0 21.0 44.0 0.0 23.0 23.0
. 'Ii,""" '!>lX,Yill';:ljoz;;l,I""_"'~''''__lmli!ilill____-li!iIl'
~~i~Rt~I~'!&1:"4~"~',,,~~~~~~~,~~ 1Ii_
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 23.0 12.5 25.5 16,5 38.0 17.0 17.0
...ID4 =11111&~JlIJJIlIIlliitlil~;~~-". 1fJ:~lI!Ir~l~' flll.111i11
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
......In.lll._ --~._~Bl_i' -~~'I_III11[1PI II
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
__~lrj_Jl!alI!-I.~riv~"_inl--- lrr~r
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max
__III" !%111l1.lilIIlIIW!JWi'iillillll'!lliillllllll 11IIlII!lii~1Il..[11 If, .'1
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
. ~ .~, ",Y'",,~iji~~~~JlJi1z~~fu~,~Jif~t.~___.
Act Elfct Green (s) 10.5 25.0 90.0 13.0 39,1 17.0 40.0 90,0 19.0
Ilbs' -rIiIII!ilIW8~ISIIt.~illw';f.Uiill_llII~iB__1J!IIJI!IJ:'Ii~
vlc Ratio 0.08 1.00 0.49 0.95 0.28 1.00 0.02 0.70 0.01
~~IIIl1lII1~tl__~yJ!ilj''IIImlil~~lliIl12;'" ii '"
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~m'-:'ilIl!11,~fi!W~11!ll'lIDllikit!1~liillllllllftl.~
LOS D E A E B E B A C
Minimum Initial (s)
IIIIi ,.., "
Total Spl~J,:) .'
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
y. -to> "" ........ -\. "
'ae
66
t
r .....t
~
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
_"""'-
70th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max
.
, .
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 #404 0 #234 133 16 0 10
~
200 200
liIllL lllIJ.:IIIIJ - : ~
Cycle Length: 90
~1IIIIlIIIIJIIJI1l!1II__ TIRm~~_
Natural Cycle: 90
~lIl1r"~ -1I- ,r III_I
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.00
'1IIl1ilJ~" .-. - __"_____
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C
~IIfjJIEf:""
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: ~O
---
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
M .. '"" ,
Queue shown is ll1aximum after two ~ycles.'
Splits and Phases:
~: J~~
J
WilsonMiller, Inc.
.... '" M ~ v '" C01 '" .... M v
~ '" ~ ""J '" M '"
'" '" .. ....
....1
'" 0)1 N 0):
M N, N O.
N M! N (")1
~ N N ~, .. <<>1 0)1 '" '" '<t! '"
M ~, '" ~ ~,
'" C\!.j <Xl M '<:1"1
'-1
N f'-..1 ....! N1
0 .... v! (");
"C ....0 0; t'--;
l'll N1
-c c
> Ql
iii 0
II)
"- l'll 0 1'< ~! N.
:! "C '" M' (0;
'" 0; ~1
"0 l'll N (")-1 M;
0 ::E u
CIl '" .
- 0 c ;;;
l'll > i" " m
<l: '" 0; 01 ~ 0 "
-C '" g~ 0; 0; 'jij U ~
.r: '" gl <Xl' ~ ~
0:: - vi 0); . 0 . .
~ '" ("'); M! E U '" .
Ql , . u ~ "
Ql " '6' '" "
> a: ~ 0
iii U) t- U
.... ~, ....; ~, E .. a.
..II: m ~ Ul .
0 c:> E . .. 0
..... c ~ 0 u. . cr
E rn .. U 0 E "
~ c ,
.5 .. . 0 ~ ll.
u . 'e " a.
; '" c .. ~
'" ~! bj 0, . o<l . u Ul
'" ......: ~1 c 0 .
~ ....; i" u " " N I
C E
'" '<t! .....! ~I .. . :;; 0 m ~ "
M (")1 ~ .. c, 0 . ~
!!'. u ~ ci .f
'" u "
"' Ul . . '" ~ ~
::;; ::;; i" m . u
oj ~ ;: .
~~i t- t- b e
'" 01 CD, ::> ::> ~ ~ ~
'" .....; 81 "' "' "' ~ ~
V N~ ....; u. u. t- o. "
,<Xl ....j .(';Ij
- a ~ :!: !!j; e s
in
i m
'" 0)'1 '" -0
M '" (0; <1; Z
.. '<tl
'"
o
N
~'-
.~t-
;: "'';
N"Uth
oll.
OJ
<0
<;
N
~ u ~ 0 ~
.-
.~ 'O'le ~ ~
0 0:':: t- o
~
~~ ~ 7i>
. . c 0 u-o
;:.1: 0 " :E~-
" "
0 ;; 0 . o-O~
. . "C-
3 "0 Ul ;: t- ,
t- t- ,s
" 0
> .
~ E
'a
(\
U
67
--,
..J to- 0:: ...J t- 0:: ...J t- a:: ..J t- a::
W 00 m m m m m 00 m m m m
z z z ~ ~ ~ W W W ~ 3 ~
I
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
raG
68
........
..-
LO
Q)
0:::
()
---
"'C
>
OJ
L-
a>
~ i23
P37
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) ')./ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
1'------
16-Y lli r
1548~ ('I')f'..CO
----, N ..- co
806~~ f'.. N
LO ..-
Q)
0:::
()
---
o
()
~l('l')
"'C
>
OJ
L-
a>
o
()
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
BG
69
,,}
-to
..
..
-
"-
""
t
,.
\.
~
.;
~...r~rI_~~
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
_,iii& 'iilBIlII'_hill"oiW~_'%F~iiJl'" FYiF' ~
~~~~~~mhl;;&li."
Total Lost Time (s), 4.~ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
F
o
m
200 200 200 200
"""-
'c~" ;,.
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Volume (vph)
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0
__~'~"",h'" -"
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
--""'-"""%j'_\lhbilliLI.l\'_"'D1'Iiillll'_lIQ_iii!~___"__
IiliJ~~,*~']I~E~di_#~~~Jtafi~~~@
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.982
..Ii< iM_IlIi!IIi'i7~~_~~"_lIIIlIlIliililI
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.934
_ . _...m!!f$~II"~~~[,__I'-~II!ii~.'J__
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~llll"'~lI -Tlf_~~~~~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~.l~"'-'-~_
Link Distance (It) 2684 2276 2084 2338
," ,...' ":..-
16 1548 806 537 723 4 723 17 1268 3 1 4
ilf~~~j_
17 1683 876 584 786 4 786 18 1378 3 1 4
.. ..
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Adj. Flow (vph)
." '%:
Turn Type
Prot Free Prot
,,_. 'il1F
Prot
Free Perm
Permitted Phases
Free
Free
6
Total Split (s)
-"il
Maximum Green (s)
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0
""'Jill'
14.5 66.0 0.0 27.0 78.5 0.0 34.0 57.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 0.0
:IDJlfrjiK_"PiI:rTiOlic' .~
,1WtfII.._ A;:E~&GUS&lK~.~}f~ ~ ~.
10.0 60,0 22,5 72.5 29.5 51.0 17.0 17.0
....ill_..~~____
1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
;,..,," . .. "
AII-RedTim~.(s)
Lead-Lag Optimize?
<<'H*',,!,"Sim;Zt1 -t""
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Il..g~
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max
~.@!~-Jt-~l@-_~.gyjr~' ..
~~~5it~,fYf~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0
BII_~)jJ.ililIIIIIIIIIII.IiIllIlr~il.lr" ' .. ~... '
Act Elfct Green (s) 10.5 62.0 150.0 23.0 83.2 30.0 53.0 150.0 19.0
-, i,....-_~,...t~lf""..'lltjiih''''':r''I>fl_]II..lllffll''''''!<'''FiliiP.."m.I.-.__'''..__1li__"',0iJ .._
!miW ~~~~._~'1~~k,!~~~~~~~~g~~
v/cRatio 0.15 1.15 0.55 1.11 0.40 1.14 0.03 0.87 0.04
~~III~if.'..i-~&~!l\!I~i'ltf~I_Ii" "T'
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-_2fil.'.'i"*"h1Il!lmillfli;"'iil"""I'_IiI_ll':1li!\"dJj!il!0'1'"2ii''~':j~__,~__l1ili""_1I;'''_llili
.i!~~~""d>"~,,~jL~lMWJ,~~\it~~,, "t'""'0""""'''~L,ii1IDq","",""~:s:lr", ""A'*'_'""""",'" "=~ ".imw,.~_~~I4~~1W1i
LOS E F A F C F CAD
Yes
Yes
11.0
11.0
WilsonMiller. Inc,
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
/' --too- '"
'ae
70
.,.. - " '" 1 /" ~ ~ "'"
D
D
Approach LOS
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
.
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR
Skip, Max Hold Max
-I
Max Max Hold Max
,
Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 #1154 0 #457 313 #593 31 0 21
, ~,
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200
W--1.1...r--""'~~ 1II~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_~~7"'111II~ r-'.~~-~11IIIllI "1ll~1 "
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
....lIl' ,
Cycle Length: 150
,,,,,,<,,,.,,,
Natural Cycle: 150
_ III~~~.!:_-' ,., "Ii~ J~~~-' I
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.15
- ~~r'~_1f_
Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service F
:~h' ,,:. ""1 IIl!1l-.n-~"'I(II1___-111
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
.. '7"." .",=., ~:i\""lli1'" >;Z:-"iE
50th %i1e Actuated C;cle: 150 "
!I--"'l!IlIIIIIj~-Ir~r:1l~T-~-"'--'-'-%'.---r
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
~ ~ -'!" '.'.. ...."..
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
--~----
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
oS
j~,*,e6
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
J~" ", r04
, ~ 07J+- ~8
1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
r8r
u
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
72
,)- .-+ ~ <" ....... -\.. '" t I" \. l .l
Storage Length (ft)
200
200 200
200 200
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
~o ~O 4~ ~O 4~ ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
lL.d:II~~1 .~.""""II!!:._ml.illl.l~l T
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.982
I r "_~~'-----.IIlll'- -.'. -11!l11 T~___1OOllill'M"---W'''
Fit Pennitled 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.938
~_..... mllll__I8..; ..
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
_~.- '" __L -~"'1 ~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.......1IIIIiIIr .....1Illlnlll.l11 L 111- 1111 -- , 11I1] 1'l"E\~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
Volume (vph) 16 1548 806 537 723 4 723 17 1268 3 1 4
I~~----
Adj. Flow (vph) 17 1683 876 584 786 4 786 18 1378 3 1 4
Turn Type
Prot
Free Prot
Prot
Free Perm
Pennitled Phases
Free
Free
6
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0 16.0
10.0 16.0
10.0 16.0
10.0 10.0
Total Split (s) 14,5 47_0 0.0 26.0 58.5 0.0 33.0 57.0 0.0 24.0 24.0 0.0
II '-"'__..' __
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 41.0 21.5 52.5 28.5 51.0 18.0 18.0
~I___~"-~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2,0 1.0 2.0 2,0 2.0
.
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
~'_IIII_.~--"I.IIIl_~rnIIII!
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max
__..] .JlIlll'''17P~~~.JlIIIIII
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
........tft;~- "".
Act Elfct Green (s) 10.5 43.0 130.0 22.0 63.2 29.0 53.0 130.0
~.
vlc Ratio
&
20.0
"
0.13
1.00
0.55
1.01
0.32
1.03
0.02
0.87
0_03
, .
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_1iI....I.ill'l__II!!Il_~.JI]___.rEllldtill._
LOS E E A F C F CAD
WilsonMiller, Inc,
J'" Be
~,
Immokalee Rd. at Collier Blvd. 73
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
.J - "). -(" +- , '\ t /'" '-. ! ./
Approach LOS 0 0
_"-"'-IIlIIIIHJll-NI~-
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~~---,.,._~~~,~
50th %i1e Term Code Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
_-'W~ I~_--'~ '_fu,,~, 1____-_
30th %i1e Term Code Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~-~__~--"lifJ:ll'_~!R9_iiiiliKi
10th %i1e Term Code Skip Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
--..... .._.III!~-~-'- ~..~ -~JIIIlIIiIIl-lIIl111lr-"'II~
Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 #636 0 #381 201 #490 25 0 18
lit ~.~-.!~. 1-~~'TllI'-' ~__il1f-_i_-'!!llI
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200
.1IIIfJt~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~~""-.I
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ,,0 ,~, 0
o 0
~~""I-~
Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
!"atural Cycle: 130
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.03
-11111
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service E
~-~&.iIIIIII~__'l1!_
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 130
IlIr'- ~-I___~~,""'-"
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 130
1IIIIiIlliIIIII-----_..~--~T1!fIiiI"flril.1l1[_~irn.m
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 130
[;~ "-'~-~~'1P'il.."~'il_JIIII_~l
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
.,.. lIIIl!fIIIII.llJ!'s~.'-~I~.IIII&.'Blllll.lli
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
Splits and Phases:
~:
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
f~ . ,r"
: .J.7 J+- .8
~
Jl~ d>
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
;i;
p Be
74
,.
i' Be
75
N ~ w ~ ~
,
.,; .; 0 .; 0
w ~ ~ N 0
.
f
.
"
.
E
0 w w 0 ~
'" ~ 0 M 0
~ ~ N E
N '"
<
. ~
;;
~ .
~ "
~
M ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ w 0
"! .,; 0 ~ 0 on " .0 0 .0 M '" ~
., M ~ ~ N ~ " .
"
. . <
1i ~ 0
-" 0
0 .~ ..
0 .
. 0 ~
" < '"
,; :h w ~ . 0 .
'" ~ ~ E ~ ~
> ~ w " ~ ~ .
in 0 " "
~ . , "
'" < 0
c: 0 0 ~
0 < ~ 0
.~ ~ <
.!!! < < "'
~ 0 . 0-
~ M N N ~ . 0 ~
:? ~ M .
'" ~ N M ~ '" N N ~ " ... E
- ~ '" ~ " ,. ~
.. . , " '<
.. 'x
,; " ~ ~
c::
'"
'" 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
...
0
E
.5 ~
" . .
. ~
, . . <
0 . . 0
u m m .
2 .
.
!. "
~
~ .
.
~ 0-
'" M N :? ~ M N N ~ is
~ M ~ '" N ~
W '" N ~ ..
,
<
<
<
0
.
~
"
.,
~
.
0
e
"
<
o~
';; ~ .
;;; 0 "
-is 0:
s _
- 0
0_
u
0 2
0><
~ J: < .
0 'E E
0 " .
N 0 , >
~t- 0
"
~
o
o
N
~
, <
>- ,
. 0
00
0:
.. -.~.~.~I
,. <0 0 .'
i
i
e
o
E
.
>
o
"
~ t- ~ ~ t- ~ ~ t- oc ~ t- ~
m m m m m m m m m m m m
z z z ~ ~ m w w w ~ ~ ~
"
8 C 76
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
"'C
>
co
c
0
J!l
l!)("")..- ~ 7
("'')IN ~425
~ 112
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) "" ,/ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
I ~
73----7' 1r
992-7 No)(",,)
211~-c ,..... ,.....
CD
>
co
c
0
II)
~
,. Be 77
~
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
/ -- ~ -('" - "- '\ t ~ ',. l ~
lane Configura~ons
t ~,. I'.
':',~~IIIIli~~.__z._-
Storage length (It) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~~"""~~1~.l~it.:IL'_~~\IliIlIlill_
Total lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~'4~"".
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
' , 'c .~"'..~
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
"r_~' , 'z '''___'_.
. '~m , '" ID1_fl1~'D:fiU'lmiL,
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.958 0.985
-- ~~IlIrP-"-~5_i'___.~Ir~
Fit Pennitted 0.396 0.091 0.737 0.917
. -------
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~llll'--~lIIlr--"'--rIPIlll"""~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~-'-~-~tIr..",~,~
link Distance, (It) 2684 2276 2084 ,~338
Volume (vph) 73 992 211 112 425 7 72 9 673 21 13 35
&I~~-l--'.~iI>~DII___
Adj. Flow (vph) 79 1078 229 122 46~., 8 78 10 732 23 14 38
Turn Type Penn Penn Perm
Pennitted Phases 4 4
.'
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 10.0
Total Split (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 32.0 32.0 0.0
Maximum Green (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 26.0 26.0
","",", 0, T. ","", b "".,~,
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
--'"'--",r-"1~J'llrik"'t-I--"'___~'_~.i_
~.w,'~~~~~u, ",\~
lead-lag Optimize?
"'&5''':;'__
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
.~ ';; ',';~---
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~l_~ -'1!II<<_~1' "," ' ':"._lfIII'-ll"_
Act Elfct Green (s) 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
__~"lj.ilII.'llllL i_t41Rfili~
vie Ratio 0.19 1.05 0.24 1.30 0.46 0.18 1.21 0.13
l!WiliF~"""" "P' qc' , ".B'",rM"'~r1II'iRU%.'__1'l\r''''.'.$,f..itit''..'''''n'''75rii_i'''illl'~_
aJ,~~ ,:~";;:,~,,,,, "_~,~. '" ,,!i~JE;<<~;fihlitT~2;lffi';~~_&5t~Jlht~~~S''t~~~t~~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
iF_'iii_iiiill'fli'_i!"i!"I"~IZJl-1iiLi9.~""iJ~'i""d""il""'ii1i~,liHif..tA.:lllf~il'""i!"i!$$",,".j'.d,~q4.'_
~'.&f!i&~~i~:~,SR~lliM!:(~ff~l~.t.:~..,,:r:0";".A\1!%WM$&::kAKfub;JI~W!~:gt?10~;~$!if~1fltiff'ikljj=.y:~!m,4'4G ..'
lOS B E A F B B F B
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
78
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
..J
-
"
..
,.....,.
"
.....
t
!'
.....
~
./
Approach LOS D D F B
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 #828 40
,
200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.30
Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.2%
ICU Level of Service H
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
-'~li~~.~I"- "w '~i IT.
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
..---
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
~:
.,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
, 8 C 79
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
81
..J
-
,.
("
-
'-
~
t
/'
\.
~
.;
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~,,-'1_~~"'" - .............._
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
BIlL IIIIII~_
Fit Protected 0.950
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
" '---'-~---T_~]1[1I111l11111111l
0.950 0.957 0.981
Fit Permitted 0.061 0.140 0.713 0.870
",
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2084 2338
Volume (vph) 93 1657 268 138 847 17 97 12 916 31 14 37
".
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1801 291 150 921 18 105 13 996. 34 15 40
Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6
,~ J
"
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
....
Total Split (s). 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 88.0 0.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62,0 62.0 0,0
" ,
Maximum Green (s) 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0
_~&----ll""'-----~~I-'~" r~"~-'ili1t
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~j~
Lead-Lag Optimize?
~-II"~.~IDII~P"- rnlli [i'~~1
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
, , .~ ~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11,0 11.0 11,0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_'f'"' ~'-~-----_-'IIIiIII_e
Act Effct Green (s) 84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 58.0 58.0 58.0
_1I1_1I.~i~II"~~11 --_ml~~I!!_II'~'~'-7illRlll!..IIiI.lWillg"'llIIIII
vie Ratio 1.58 1.73 0.32 1.03 0.90 0.23 1.61 0.15
ii4!11IlIll"_____IIIJJIl!..IIIl.rlHllk:l11 B~"'~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~"-~--'~~_Djililfil:r-&~Vi~,,!,l!liI---~
"''''"-, , - "'"". _"", ,. ~;. =... ~,"'"ml~^1~!!0!l~
LOS F F B F D C F B
WilsonMiller. Inc.
'BC
82
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
~
- ")-
.
-
" '"
t
I"
\.
!
./
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
, .~" '. :/l'\\i [l[ --11
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max 0
Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
L
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #207 #2855 164 #306 #1110 128 #1659 76
.--
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
_~1"J~l"IIIII~_~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~TIIII~ ""00"-
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 150
e- 1IIlII"""ltI11_ ....--'_- 111111 111_ Jlilm
Natural Cycle: 150
lI'fIIIIIIIIIIBll11"--~'- ~1III1IIIlIIIIIIIIII._ - -~r ..liIJlf mIll
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.73
Intersection Capacity Utilization 162.3%
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
ICU Level of Service H
iW1 ,<""~"":-
"'IIII'.lIIilllll_..lIIllll~lII_
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
~~_ JIIII'---III
Queue shown is maximum after two cycle~: .. '''1IN': 'ji
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
f:"" ""~,
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Wilson Blvd.
~:
~
WiisonMiller, Inc.
raG
84
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
..J- -.+ '\- ~ ....- '- "'\
t
r \. ~
./
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-------~ ~ J;~ 111__
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.981
".....-~~ .---,~
Fit Permitted 0.236 0.160 0.699 0.373
BJ1lI[I~.- ~Inlll'lnl~~- .._
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
.11I----------
Volume (vph) 93 1657 268 138 847 17 97 12 916 31 14 37
Adj. Flow (vph)
101 1801 291 150 921
18 105
13 996
34
15
40
Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
.
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6
.1
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
~
29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 0.0
-
Maximum Green (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 30',0 30.0 30.0 30.0" --'
~---~.......-
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~.~I!__.Ji1I
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max
~-~~-
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
____0.:,.- ,-"',.- '. :'lIItillllJllll
Act Elfct Green (s) " 25.0 25:0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 32.0 32.0 ' " 32.0
_," ','" ""., i>i_~"Mn',lim"m,tdiWA1iIB",!
~~!.?th~,,,,, ^"~m&mg~\W1fW~~~;2!!_f
vie Ratio 0.60 0.92 0.37 1.30 0.47 0.03 0.17 1.36 0.26
ll..n -~ i~I'II~~__ " 'L,J.IlIIIIlI
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.iI..IllIiIlIlllIlI._I.1JIO~_"'~
LOS C C A F B A BFA
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
~.. 8e
"
,
85
~
-
'"
.
-
'-
~
t
/*"
'-.
t
..I
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~
Queue Length 95th (ft) #100 #345 42 #180 130 11 49 35
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.
~ycle Length: 65
Natural Cycle: 65
-;A\'
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.36
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.8% ICU Level of Service E
~--.rr~____
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
~_~._Ir~~
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
-~1iii-.JF'~Il~
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
---~~i~~-'~-~'-~"'i~_M~H~1
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
.,.. ...._,.... E'""""---
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
r~"-~
,~.s
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Wilson Blvd.
:3:
~
Wilson Miller, Inc.
raG
86
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"0
>
a:l
c
o
.!!l.
,.... '<:t..- $: '-17
C'? ..- C'? ~
~ ~47
" ~138
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) "> " /' Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
/'--~
16~~1 ,....lcr
~ . 0> ..- ..-
268~~ 0>
a:l
c
o
II)
~
r-:~
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
8e
.<~.
, ,
87
/
-
l-
("
-
,
~
t
/'"
\.
~
"
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
Storage Length (ft) 200
~-0"~
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~---~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00
" ""~I.illf.~I!lIIlI.~_1Ii.~~- ____
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.957 0.981
~ln.I~"lif'"ij'~iD1___1Ir-"~iIIIiIf'~'-"'T[1
Fit Pennilted 0.261 0.222 0.722 0.882
--~-_.- -,~._.~ ----..""-__~II.r_1 '~'--~'" -....... III
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~IIII-----'-;~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft)
2684
2276
2084
2338
Volume (vph) 93 1657 268 138 847 17 97 12 916 31 14 37
~.
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1801 291 150 921 18 105 13 996 34 15 40
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Penn Penn Prot Penn
'F~
Pennitted Phases 4 4 8
,. ~ -, ",
Minimum Initial (s)
~'
Total Split (s)
--_Jdk'..'.."_ilifiilililli:'liifiim_iilIi" .
~~B-~ f li~~H~.~'"
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
~'EllIlIIIIlll-'W\_llr~'iiJllf-$--~i'l
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~-,:,.'
Lead-Lag Optimize?
,: . ,'" '.~~~WIl~1!j"
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
~mBllI_'U.III11~lllllllll"~~~.1III
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
1lI.IIiI:1Ii_.__III111f!\ll.i:tlmmUMWil"I4Willlllilllllijll1l1l~ .
Act Elfct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
11<" -,,',... "MilIllr~~~iII!""""'~_""'QtiPJtAi~2!:l"" i!!i"".',"
m:!~ ~ _______ ~~___'"_~_;"'\Efi-Uid-$~>",
vlc Ratio 0.52 0.89 0.36 0.90 0.45 0,03
-""l!I"'1IIlII'lIr-",.."t%II"M,nlil,'j&jil,n,lII!_~"l.1IllI1l[l"-iii"'"""'fiilldll%!lili1"j",'
~~4l1ili1k -~ruwm mmr~~J'@:~a->!!J:RH;",i~~#~:Hfmik~1_i
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.. ."" ...:, rm, "', . ...ll'l,~~1illfU~I!i~~1I!II!I!l1Ilf~
LOS C CAE B A A
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
22.0
22.0
"
22.0
22.0
22.0
-tr~ ~
,,-,f!i0.
19.0
19.0
19.0
ii--;-
0.21
0.85
0.13
--
0.0
C
A
WilsonMiller. Inc.
l"
Be
88
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
/-
-
"t
-("
-
'- ...,
t
I"
'.
+
..;
Approach LOS B B B A
''1' ~
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
.--11111I_#---- 'J~I~""'-_II!)~
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
-,
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
'-
10th %jle Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #72 #243 33 #122 86 8 43 #236 26
.
200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Redu~tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Cycle Length: 45
~-~lJl_l_~__l!i1~lIIl-~.~--""__.1!lI!ll
Natural Cycle: 45
, J """M~ItI"'IIIIIIlI~n' 2:_
Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4%
___illiliiifif~ I rF1''U'B.!'
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45
-......
50th %ile Actuated C~cle: 45
ICU Level of Service E
Bill;
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45
r--rf:llIilIIIt-lll'~1B~~ 111i_1B~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
I~~
~.6
=1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
r 8e
89
'" <0 0 <0 '" <0 coi .... ~ U')j N
~ ;; ... ~ v '" 0; '" ~i N
~ "', '" ~ .
N! ~l "'
m
c
0
m
m
.
0:
~i <1;: '" ~! M ~
:: ,
, ~ ~ ~
~l "'I c
w
9 0
.
'il E
"
;; a
.:2,>
'" ,.
M: '" co: "' M <oi ~l '" ;:1 Ll1i "- ~
~1 '" N' V ai '" ~: 0 ~
<< ~, M 0
~1 ::;; '"
<oi v ,,1
~~ <Xl Il');
~i
'ti ....:~ ~i
>
in
c co; M ~,
0 N' '" ""
.!!! ~: to:
NI
:;: c
- i!
l'll 0; ,.
'ti ~1 u "
w
0:: '" m ~
Mi ~ " m
Ql I- "
0
Ql b U
iii '. ~
. 0
..II: .
E U u '" !!J
0 , . 8- c
E a "e- " ,
0>: '" > ~ 0
co, '" ll. I- 0
E 0= 0 " .. ~ 0. ~
. Ul
E '. .. .
~ . '"
c " 0 "- E
~i '" ~ u u 0;
'. c "
'" '" '" . 0 a ..
~, 0> . "e- ::;; >
Nl i u c 0.
<">1 '" 0 ll. ~ Ul
. N m " 0
I:- " c :r: .
U c " N E
~ . " e m ~ ,
.. '" .
rn ci . J
!'!. u ~
t- " u " ll.
Ul . '" ~ ~
Ul . m
::;; ::;; l:- . u
01 '" ~ I- " m
0 '" s! ~. l- I- j;; e
'" ~ :J ::> 0 0 n
v '" ~ Ul Ul 0 "' ;:; ~ :i-
Nl "- "- t- o.
:=. i'i i'?: '!: e ie: E
"
.
"
~1 '" z
.... .... '"
N ~ LOI '"
j
oj
H
CI Be
90
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
"'C
>
co
c
0
.!!l
('<)<00 ~ 22
-.;tl-.;t ~1075
~ 154
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) ,,/ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
! ~
106-? 1'r
2008----7 00('<)<0
307~ 0..........
..... 0
> ..-
co
c
0
II)
~
'ae
91
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
~
-+
..
-f
-
-\.
'\
t
/'
'.
~
~
Lane Configurations
'i t ,,0( 'i. ,1> ",.4'
..'"
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~~~--~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0" 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ..~:O 4.0 4.0 4"~0 4.0 4.0
'(f
4-
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.-_._,~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
· --~m "'V~._~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.957 0.980
'l~I'!IIL ~~~iII1ll.-r"if---:H_'~~
Fit Permitted 0.048 0.096 0.682 0.851
~~ .w~_ _m__""", nlllll"'- ~~_,___...
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~II;-'_"'____---~_l.'fil,~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.0,0 1.~0 1.0~. 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~..-"._--_.._---~_.~--
Volume (vph) 106 2008 307 154 1075 22 108 13 1016 40 16 43
"". /';
115 2183
0'
1168
24 117
14 1104
43
17 47
:.II!t.
2 6
...'~,.. "'IIIIIfIj'" ".
",' .... -
c. ." ...:m. .. ,.
10.0 10.0 10.0
;'Jll'_
Lead-Lag Optim~ze?
Recall Mode
. ,
82.0 82.0 82.0 82.0
"
2.0 2.0 2.0
.
None None None None None
62.0
'.
62.0 62.0 0.0
.~,.:--.
56.0 56.0
56.0 56.0
"";"
2.0 2.0
'"
56.0
All-Red Time (s)
"
2.0 2.0 2.0
JIilIIIIf'..-ai1Jlll
""..~",
Max Max Max
Flash DontWalk(s) "~!.o 11.0~_ 11.0 11.0
~ct Effc!C-'reen (s) 84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 84.0
T ~B '" '" C"" 1__lt,~
vie Ratio 2.30 2.09 0.36 1.67 1.15 0.27 1.80 0.18
1lI--_.~-~---'I1~~-~'''li''I8>iiI1''~'''lIIil\ki~;_Jllil\Wti
-Ili_--'~"'~""'-_______"'_r__~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
[i;_"--"'M~~ .. ,:'i~<-'IitSI_9_5!iJ:~
JiM~$lf~~;P~~;., , "'" ~z,j!!~~~~
LOS F F B F F C F C
WilsonMiller, Inc,
raG
92
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
.J
-
..
..
-
'-
"\
t
I"
'.
l
..;
F
F
F
C
, 'C""!1.i ~..." ~
Approach LOS
" ,
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~-~-~~"'ZIlBlli_~~". ~.rjI!liI!M
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
- --
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~ 1t_1~11_.Ii___._r'lII
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
, .' '_:mI111I
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~~ '",.. ~~ ..~.
Queue Length 95th (ft) #271 #3615 201 #298 #1636 143 #1895 93
~-~'III11_-~~1kilJl~-~,,~_.v1ltllElllJl~IIl___
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
_'r_~I_
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IlJllIllIl:illllllilElillliilll.IIIII11111IIlBllIIlllllll!" ,. ,',';' , ""0. "1IlllIIIIIIIill
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_.~---..~' ., ""~.~~~.
.. _~ _.~,..,,~h,~,,~_ .
Cycle Length: 150
1II11f1..lilll!llil1t:_.~~...lIqllilll!_. ' .
Natural Cycle: 150
~!IIII~.llIIi_.mi~.iIIlIIII.'--:III.:'!':11HI
Maximum vie Ratio: 2.30
__"lIII.r1f.II_11r.~r~
Intersection Capacity Utilization 186.9% ICU Level of Service H
_~I.BlII.IIIIIIIIlIIIIII~ ',;." '
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
Ili!lllJl4rllll1l.lllllilll[IIII__~Bl'__"""III~.'- "I~~-
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
~'--lllll.llIi.IIl...r:
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
--lfII'-~RTT1lrllr_ .. ".,' ~ .'d" '. ,-
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
F 1~""(IIr'_~__
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles_
'ilI!IIiIIRl'~.llh"
~":~ '"~~
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Wilson Blvd.
~:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
1- ..... ~ .('" +- -\.. '"\
"'BG
94
t
I" \. l
..;
4'>
.,~
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~I_~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0, 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~.. '._-'--.l::ll'~' 1'.----lIif'.-
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
I . ~__. - i IIIIlIiIllllllilll'lilJllllll :illltEDlillllll
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.980
- 'i!Dr I nllr l_!llli'-~-I r-~'Vl~~r;.[__
Fit Pennitled 0.165 0.133 0.729 0.310
IiIIlIiI -'-.[11,".- ~ 1I1.~~_IIll1I1ll1T"~"'ImI-' Ilillll
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
l' -. '1(- _ nl'lll T ~--""--'"~-Tl n~ll iJk --..
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
'" ._III_..JIliITlliiii I 111ll\'1!"~-i!lTI1IIIl_.lliIL__lIJHlii-
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~~II:I.~I----"""'"
Volume (vph) 106 2008 307 154 1075 22 108 13 1016 40 16 43
~-~-M%-~_
Adj. Flow (vph) 115 2183 334 167 1168 24 117 14 1104 43 17 47
Il>I _ ......1..,_ ~~~!nr.__..~
:rum Type Perm Perm Penn Penn Perm Perm . 7
,~
Pennitled Phases
4
4
8
8
2
6
'.
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
-'_.__EllI'1I11 !~'ij~~.IIllIT.llll[_l_
Tolal Split (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 36,0 36.0 0.0
, '~ JilRU___1II11
Maximum Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
'.",;1iIll:~_
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
lilt. ..~I_N' 11.____......
'.
--
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max
_illJl~~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11,0 11.0 11.0
~___lIIIIn. 6111II ,___D.IIIf:lllIIPIl:iII_I_..--~
Act Eifel Green (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 32.0 32.0 32.0
~..IlIII'Il&'._lIIlIIl'i1IIJIIIIIIII_"'"
vie Ratio 0.87 1.00 0.38 1.58 0.54 0.03 0.20 1.62 0.41
11"11IIIII' ','__..._.._' . .__".. 'c' ,
-. . . " .
,,,,1; .., ,. p . ,,,,;;A . Jj, . .., .... .,l, "" .
Queue Deiay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
..... ......L]..IIIlIIIIIIII.~flll_rl!I-~-"'~-E~~'--.._0.~M'-
. II. ..ilRJ .,' .. . .;;"...&~~~BKjmfeln;".'.:ilS!i1!*~tJ;~EF~it.J~~~~~
LOS E D A F B A B F B
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
..!- - "). ., - '- "
Be
95
t
I'
\. ~
.;
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200
--------.........-~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~~-
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
',b4-F
Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.5% ICU Level of Service G
,',~. . ,"T-";II.IIL~
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 70
~~1il1lllillllllilJl '"" ,. "0"
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70
~tim:j!I!II~_lIIIIIIIt":."
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70
~if~I~:ilIil_~--i!lt__
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~~..
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
'Z'" "z "'
I' ~"
Splits and Phases:
~e2.
~\;.. 06
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
96
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"'C
~
llJ
c
o
(/)
('t)(OO ~ ~2
.;t T"" .;t <E---'
I <<-1075
~ ~154
Immokalee Rd (CR 846) "'" ,,/ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
I -c::
106~ 1'rr
2008--7 oo('t)(O
--7 OT""T""
307~-g T"" ~
llJ
c
o
II)
~
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
If'
t Be
97
"f
-
\-
-("
-
-\.
.....
t
r
\.
~
,.I
~n~:." ".1~~~
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
-'--*~i_F'"""'"'-"""'1!Ili_dilill__"!!lHlllll!1l1il!fiiH_,"___
1!'l~---~~~~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
, M' -'" +'.. "'-'-, " 0"" _. N _ ~
''{'''-
o
--~~
Trailing Detector (ft) ,
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00
P"'~~~"!'lli<.
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.957 0.980
S'- '11I-~~ri\'--~.l.I..II.IIIiI.I_~.: .' 'P. ,.
Fit Pennitted 0.191 0.167 0.692 0.859
l:Il'l.~'- p. '.,'
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes No Yes
~ ~1~ii'.~'~~,"m'"""~_.~~~lilllllll
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 ,~:OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.~O 1.00 ~;go 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276
_1- ~,., ,
Volume (vph) 106 2008 307 154 1075
r~._lliljlf'llm:_~,
Adj. Flow (vph) 115 2183 334 167 1168
I . "
Turn Type Penn Perm Perm Penn Perm Prot Perm
""~----i01k-I'~_____i""'#ill______,
~~~aml+ili~~4willRmb__1IiI~WUB~~
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6
--~_.J" '.'., "__
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0'
....111'" ...,~'...".- "'~_~
Total Split (s) " 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
-~~~. .,.,."".'..,.~
Maximum Green (s) ., 22.0 22.0 .22.0 ~ 22.0 22.0 22.0 16,0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
0'~."&_.'illllJli4hifA&n'"__i"'~_\lij1ti~!ii\_
.~~~~~~
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
1RIIiIIIIIlII~'<"jllllr~~""""'4' .
Lead-Lag Optimize?
-'
Recall Mode
2084
2338
22
108
13 1016
'.h;i~
40 16 43
,'ili~___
~
43 17 47
24
117
14 1104
None None
"'\9_~~_~
None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
it':", .-,.
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~~.,.rJi!j~liIBlil~~~
Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
~_flllf~lI.Il-..'~~II'-..'I.rT.. .....Alllli~l "11II 'il~1I
vlc Ratio 0.67 0.89 0.36 1.12 0.48 0.03 0.28 1.10 0.19
~W~..111l!l~tI'JlligI-.-,._~__
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
r~~~d1;'fIl1"'W{"'Y_Rdi81l1ii'''mGi!i_M''''1'''''''''l:4.!i'iAi''II\J1....__...<'''''''!~
~~__f!I~,II!It",II!It__Jl_rtliF~tH?J!I_ ,,~I,_'!i/___ ~
LOS DBA F A A BFA'
WilsonMiller, Inc.
I'
ac
98
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
.J -+ ""t .('" ...... '- ..... t I" '-. + .('
Approach lOS
B
C
E
A
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Cycle length: 50
Natural Cycle: ~O
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.12
~~_ ~"Wllll"
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU level of Service F
.1\1].-iS'j....~.'.,I!f-J_..___ ,__ 1_
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50
_~I~--~ 1111II 1IlIi" -'.'111I
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 50
10th %lle Actuated Cycle: 50
w
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~~__",...II---.--' ~~-~._Jl
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
I~:
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Wilson Blvd.
:j::
::1
WilsonMiller, Inc,
~
~ ~ N -
,
ori <ci .; N 8
~ w w ~
.
~
~
.
E
:;: ~ ~
~ N 0
~ ~ w E
~
-
. E
l! "
~ .
~
w 0 0 0 0 .., 0 ~
0 " 0 ci ci 0 N .; .; ~ .. ~
ci ci w w ci w ~ :: ro ci .a .
~
n . !i
:c
- ..
, ~
0 "g!
" . E
~ - ~
.,; ~ ;\ 0 . ,Q '.
> ~ N W E " ~
W N ~ " g:
iii 0 ~
" . 0 B
Cii ~ - 0 \:
- 2 0
'0 E '0 - "'
C , - - ~
e- o .
.. ~ ~ m . " ~ .
lr a ;\ 0 0 ;;; ;;; 0 N " . " !
~ N " ~ "
- => ,Q
.. ~ ~ ~
.,; "
~ ~
lr .
.
CD
Gl a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cii ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
-"
0
E
.5
F
Be
100
~
0 m ~
~ N "
N ..
,
-
-
~
0
.
~
~
.,
.
..
a
'aG
102
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
.-1
-+
"
.f
-
" ....
t
/'"
\.
+
.;
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0
~.._.j
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
I IIIIIIlf~~ ~. IJU
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-~ mnRIT.ll VI~~iilT~_I-1 '~'''''''~iTl'''iJlfllf I]DIIIIIIJIIIfl!'-'
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
- "m'''~I..~FJj'm'''llnl!l~IIIJiI]I~ ~~..~~~~;rn'll1lil2
Fit Permitted 0.267 0.757
- Il:llcJ~IIIl:.IIIJ~_lII1lrn1_~~r rm.'-'--fl-lln:-- ~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~~ ~____oo I
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
. 1.~i:i~r>--I\II'!II~I;ill_If'''. '~nl~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
-ll_~
Volume (vph) 0 517 317 30 229 1 159 0 34 0 1 1
~-xT____~
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 562 345 33 249 1 173 0 37 0 1 1
_ "'_1"
~. '. . ~~
Turn Type Perm, 'C P<;rm .F:errr~ Perm Perm Perm
.." '~ m,_
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6
,~_.
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
II"", ..Jln.____.
Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
_' "_'~ ~~. " '.-"" M.
. HS . , ,.' ;. ,:. ; ~
..""' d.. i,.,. ..,"... ...^.... ....... ..... ... ... . ,'t.,
Maximum Green (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
- ~ - 1II~'.IIIlI!IlI1III!f'
AII~Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~JlI!I]IIl_~," ',~_
Lead-Lag Optimize?
-'W-~_lVlBf~- ~~
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
lli'__'.IIIIII~~.plfl
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
..IIi-'...._illI~_~WlD__Iillli!~
Act Elfct Green (s) 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 18.0 18.0 18.0
-.._l:rl.ll!lIJIBJ_liilVa__ I i1!lI1I IJI__-1lIllIR
vlc Ratio 0.72 OAO 0.16 0.32 0.30 0.06 0.00
4>-
,u.-
200 200 200
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2004 Existina Conditions PM Peak
--"
~;
f 8 C 103
-
,.
f""
+-
'-
~
t
~
\.
+
./
90th %i1e Term Code
Max Max
70th %i1e Term Code
Max Max Max Hold Hold
MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
34
19
79
63
12
3
Turn Bay Length (ft)
200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~-I!_II~-
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~
1f._.m.4h!IIIIII!II"I_IIIt'''ili5Ji.\1''.''''M''''~__~,
Natural Cycle; 45
,.~~ /''0/,..,..,(
. ""'1(<
F;
Maximum vlc Ratio; 0.72
~-"~~~~-'-$"---"-
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.9% ICU Level of Service A
~.llal.1_lIlIlIIIlBlillJllllllliilIl___~ili, " ,'o/'lli~ iiF}; "'"
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle; 45
Zr" , '" <i"' 'r~.-'-~r__ilf__~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 4'5
""""""" I" IU.r.~~.~"ii'+"',
1 oth %ile Actuated Cycle; 44
(i, ;m'''ii'' 'lli""'i__~__~:Bl~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
... .02
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Randall Blvd.
~
.8
.4
~~ 06
Wilson Miller, Inc.
'l:$l;
104
!< ~ ~ ~j ~ ;0 ~i N
~
C'l~i ~ lIOi
~,
;i gi
(f);
~
.
"
.
D
~ Mi ~ \OJ ~ ;;; ~1 N ~
.. ~, ~ ~
~, ~ '<tj .
.
'"
.
;I
0 C
W .
.;: w: ~l 101 E .
to '" 5i]
l: w &r
N '<1:.1 . 0
.. ~:s
0
III
to
;:
to OIl 01
:E ;\ qf
'" ~
,; ~ "';
>
iii J:: 0 0: 0:
-
~ 0 ~i gj ~
N
'" a5 <'oil .
Ni . ~
." ~ >- 0
l: ~ ~ "
to 0 '. .
D:: '" . 0 . i
E ~ ~ '" .
- " . "
to 011 0>[ g 'e , .
'" . ~ 0
,; ~ 0:11 to, ~ >- " "
ci cij cii " . ~ 0. . .
D:: . .. '. "' . ~
E
c ~ 0 ~ . '"
.. rn " " E .
.. 0 01 0: '. c u ,
0 0; .....i <( <( . 0 " ~
'" N ~, 01, . 'Q ~ > ,~
"" ,,; all ~ Ii Q: , 0.
"'
0 ~, . N . ~ 0 .
E >- u , , N r
c ~
lj . " 0 rn ~
.E " " 0 . "
"!. ~ ~ d .
>- " ~ >
"' ~ . . '" ~ ~
~ ~ m . u
>- \: >- 3 .
>- >- .
~ ~ " 0 0 ~
"' "' " "' ~ ~ ;f
~ ~ >- ~
- '" C ~ ce; ce; E:
;,;
.
"
z
13 .
. '" "
'0' .
0 i>. "E E
N .
" ;:. >
0
it "
.
13 '" 12
c .
,,,, " E
0 " .
i>. >
>- 0
"
" ~ " G
c
0 , .~ ~ .
:I: 0 .
;; ~ :;, E . ;;;
N 0 ~ 0 > 'E
. u >- 0
.
~
!
10
,j
f Be
.r
106
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
;
--II>
.....
f
-
'-
"
t
~
'-.
!
"
Lane Configurations ~ t "~ , ~ to ,4' "__!t-
III -.-_.-' F~~' i' -':~Ii'lr_.
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
____ ~"'I~""II.__..IIlL Il!fur-~___
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IIi!!i -.-'-II-'IIIIi'-----...r- "IU - -'rnlllll'llli
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
- ...~_lIIIIlIIIIiIl.I_~"m1iiWJ'.IIII.
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
IE 'i-II-~~~_l'-I..I"~"-..~.~.~...r"" ~[I]IlliIE'
Fit Permitted 0.054 0.754
I' r .~_1l-1IIlliIlll!ill-IIlPi~...-I..I~- --'IIi ~_
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
_______~...M _..I~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft)
2684
2276
2084
2338
''''11
Volume (vph) 0 1292 537 61 852 2 222 0
_ll!-rlli...._'!iiW.~----
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1404 584 66 926. 2, ",241. 0
.. ---
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
_JSJlj_~-~,,';ii!llll!1'.jfiIli-:~IIl\!!.JKLU'lli~%-~2.1Ij&~iI!IIiJ-lIlID!
~~_fMj~;$miillfm;JiY1ftm~~1['ill~,:w~,Wm_'~~_'ili.~!Ki~~~~j
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6
___w&!.i_~--ur_iliiiiitil!lliJ-_miillij""EY__0!" 'm" "w,- ,- '
~~W~~;{fJ~mirJmtmil}J.y~~.WldL~~.'._._-:," ~_
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
-..i'.--~"'~-Wli!i,*_iII-il>'!I-~I, "'._~ '.. ,,;;~-fLli8
_1WDi.411.!!~~~~~~~~~~ _.J ,,->vt_e
Total Split (s) 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
..._R_!i"llZ_~1IHf7iIi_l'n?i!liil!_MiiI!"ili"liidk'il---m1ii!--ii6l-ilLfB!iJ~'Oli'
flB~kf~~~~~_WB:ft'!'~~~~1!!1MiZjft~n!ll~;gjjHr~1tM!'~~!ii~
Maximum Green (s) 72.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 72.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
UlIIIilllIfl!lfMlllF,,_A;,.,_'Iilo/'''"'''f.~'''An!~,*'''--~"Si~~J<nmW'1ii"t.''t'''''''l''j1fi.lBil!____'-,,~
__tfl!R19~~~!2!&mmYJL~4Wlm'fMlInmJ:i~&~~~r!~Yijf$l1mltW1,~~Jlt,,~~iW$.~~ . ~tMfi
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
___J!Thtl!_llifdl1rf'91_iPJlliIil__lf'.1iiiiill___"$_S1ii____Jf"__Ji1llllf_t
~~!1WJiM___~~~tW!rrn~~fB~iill0~A1~,,~~RMrP2~~~~
Lead-Lag Optimize?
pIIf<lIiIlmlli~~_i:;!II~ '. _I__IIE
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
_.~1L._II.j:ir ' ~. - - 'B' ~_
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
III1lJiIlIlI.V'qIllJilil....__, ,.,. '" ",. -<<".
Act Effct Green (s) 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
~,,--. ',_IIItIIr"-~_II_
1.02 0.45 0.88 0.67 0.95 0.16 0.02
47 0 3 3
- -'-1S:JIIlIIIllI-
51 0 3 3
vlc Ratio
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'ae
107
--"
-+
,.
-f
-
'- '\
t
/'"
'-.
+
.;
^,T~';""
90th %i1e Term Code
Max Max Max Max Max
MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200
~.~__1I11
Starvation Cap Reductn 0
p_1b ._~.....
Cycle Length: 100
.._~ d~~--""!lViillllllllJlll')!J~i1i_~!li'!&~~~ii"~Mli!~~s'f'~1Iiiiilll'.' li!J1~ ,';T"'"
IlIliL_.'____" " " . .""*@___IliI...!I",."__mL_,_" ,
Natural Cycle: 1 00
!BJIIII'~l!I5-ii1lll!llliiliilni!ni!I~~~Wm;fmlmmmilllll.Y~4lEl."illJIIIIIJI!"'~"-.
Maximum vie Ratio: 1.02
IiliIIIiIir--..'----.".-"". ""."llla.::' "~iIl!ifu~1!lI'l!h\,~liy7!'b""'"
,______~d!!WI.~'BffilI: ,_1@t12"4:!k1&ll~""",^"",*"$'",. .
Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.7% ICU Level of Service F
.""a__~_mll;",ii!!ill2,llp'=0"-!"!i".',',lE,i"''','',',''',''',,...,..,.,"..',_',.. iJ!!!II'_-."'Y"-Sl&'.iilL~1II
~~~'!t~~_~~iifiI@t:t;lt1tV1:fd';0;i\!?ih~[{!1h1?AiG~Wl~~~ "~~b~~L:0"l?k'lfui' <".
90th %lle Actuated Cyd~:'100' .,.,.' _..... .. ." ,," ., .'
_'II' ,._.I'I!Ilf.ll'iilLlilm~!!lIIlillic.il1i:imimmmUlmlll_"!+' ".Sl .",."~" '_
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 100
. " , "...'.$. .... "....,,","',',..',.. '.i,"*''''''UIJ!<i'"illk._-ltl!lliSI;iiil'_'_xil!.W3lliil!iiilx,!i!iI_''il:jjf!,
", ~~4.." "':";~lii\~~j;ij~i~~t~'7i\i~~~~jik~~~,i~~~_
1 oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 100
----:!l:~~"j'X>ii~m.~"~II,..,,,l'lliDite;;q"'I',~:"4~"'""""fillz1li\1JE'.x_.hlli."Ar-.!lIIi"~illil
~!iD~(~~J!T:!,~~m:~tmmM~J"",~_;~~","M!=iW,'~~9i1~!UJF!~d ,i&?~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
1f/,_1i1lJ~"'-'''''Jil''>;R"iiI'''''''''''''''''':li~lllI.Ir1I1i'l'llr_~''--_'"ii'M:m'1l''''''
~.B~~~,A~~l;~w,;,'."".~il~Y:~,:":.'.,;",,.._ ."; 'j~giifm''',., .:
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
',......"'.,,,1.
"M''''''""',,,'
I~,.;":"'" "'"":J'~m:"'''oo", (C' M'I' ,.."" '"
,"- ~ .
~
Wilson Miller, Inc,
'BG
108
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
"0
>
co
ro
"0
c:
ro ~
(')('1')0 a::: ~
l ~52
~" rl1
"'" '-../ Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
/'-~
O~
1292----3>
----3> .
537~~
co
Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
1'r
"lOI"-
N -Q"
"I
ro
"0
c:
ro
a:::
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
Be
109
.-f
-
~
.f
..-
'-
....
t
~
\.
!
..I
'1'55ttt ,',' ", ""P,",".m:l'!"L.~~'""'ii~Ji_
";_,Jlft~iby;i1f;~,^" ",,'~Jwtm:~~
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~m_itn~ilIJ_llirJi.:;.._._m{t~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
-"5' , "';'J:Wil"'llillili1rlli!iBIi'I\-.-~--!""i'i_,ii!"'-
~WI~"", ',~~~~~f~._
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~fiIII~.JI1I_~JIiIlII*1IiIIIIIl
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
r -AIIII~IIlI~'u'1III1_!f__liJ.lIiIlF~~~..
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
;I 11'ITII1I_'.~~-'f"Y'''~~WIIIlI.'''~l!mf.~I!.~
Fit Permitted 0.143 0.754
- .-lIlT:IlIl&iilall.. :illif-'-~:(ll'f.llllllll..Itf.~
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~~"'H..~"
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
,', i=[lJiII'
Volume (vph) '0 1292 537 61 852 0 3 3
Jt -~;:'illi' "\0,5,"'": """,,.. 'U '. ,.
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1404 584 66 926 2 241 0 51 0 3 3
B__11-~~~~
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
-,-
8 8 2 2 6
"J!lj.~II1_~Jil!1III
16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
""'f' 'c~lII_.!
Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 23.0 23.6 23.0' 23.0 23.'0 0.0
~--.---.~-
MaximumGreen(s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
_"SI.'".' -me IlwlEl'1DIIIIIl""'T'~". ," "" ""~'" "'"'~'_" ," '''''Iliililllllli' "'"'.."
------:.''' ",-=~'J_'" '~. ~ "", . ",;:;,; . ~,. ;;,' ": - - , r" ,1ft' .
, .'. .. .... ,So.., ,.,' _ .. "". ' . '", . .. 'i'.. '. 0:; " ' . .,' ~Mi _
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
_......'......""'1._11__111111.___1'-"1_
Lead-Lag Optimize?
~-~IiIl\IL!!f~~' '~"""'. " , ' "i1J~mr'
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
u. llll"--,"",""tlN"~-~in'-r-'k'ft_'f'~__
fi' .______~dl![__"_~_~__
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~~""[I,.'.~.i~nm'!!l'mlll.1I_'iIIIl'~
Act EffctGreen (s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 19.2 19.2 19.2
1illMlllh~_~_g_'$""'Jil"'iiIlillillillI~'~il!!c:liii!ilin':iiO.ijjiliil~'lr'"I,,"ji!f'rfiilliiitU!l'i;l__lilldliJ%t1tdL"ti!$0"'_'Pj
~al 11~~iRLm;.I.";lMn,jhLd",,~~i!1llii'm@lt ."..~ ~~
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.49 0,36 0.00 0.49 0,09 0.01
. _liIlf'W ,='p,.=' m.. - d''''iJ_j~i9€i'.llilR:IlFfjjii?>'_i1JiI!iifllil__M''li''''''
"_.1I - ,~i~~",~~~;,,1iif*W'Jgb,'\*mirnl!m~'l:~~
Queue 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Permitted Phases
4
-'''K' :'"
4
'lk. .~
Minimum Initialjs)
A
c
c
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~' Be
, 110
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
J -+ ") .-- ....... -\.. "" t ~ '-. l .I
90th %i1e Term Code
Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
II
50th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code
Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
--~-
Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 37 #62 82 2 134 24 7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3%
._IBr "" '-
90th %ile Actu~ied Cycle:'EiO
, ", '" '$ 11~WI[IIF-i~-
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 58.5
-~--...-----~
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 46
, 'J'__lIi.-. _.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
Splits and Phases:
~:
3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Randall Blvd.
=:~~
:J
WilsonMiller, Inc,
,. 8 r.
r L
111
;;; '" '" mi '" .. Mj N
~ <> .. 11), ,S
.. ~i
~
.....j .
! e
'"
.
:a
.
lOj 0> C
0
<Xl, ;1; .
, lOl .
I .
'"
~
,
~
c
w
Mi ~l 2 ~
;;; M '" "' .. N c .
0 "' <> . E
"' '" .
0 ,
~ ~
0
0
";:
CO
C co: 1'-1
Ql N N
0 0> <Xl, ....
OJ "" '"
-c:i II) T"".i
CO ,
> ";:
in CO
:!E
iii Ql '" Ol! ~l
'0 ~ "'
C (,fj
CO .r:
0:: ..
- ~
- 3: c
0 or or .
CO '"
0 0: 0; u
-c:i CD '" (")1 IE . .
<ri lO'j ~
..... ~ " ~
0:: Q Ni ... , .
0
Ql N '" 0
'.
CIl . 0 .
iii .
E " u 0: .
..II: " . ~ "
0 " '0 IE ,
'" m! '" > 0: ~ ~ 0
E <Xl co; <Xl ... 0
l ci Oi ci " .. '" ... ~
.5 . <J>
E .. 'jij .
~ . '"
c " 0 "- E
i rn " U ~
'" 01 0 '. c ,
0 0; '" <( <( . 0 " ..
0 "< u . "2 " > ...
ci '" C ll. ~
N 0 "'
~ N . u 0
" c :x: .
t- " c " N E
" . " ~ m ~ ,
~ .. m <> . ~
!!!. u ~ ci .
'" u " 0..
<J> "' . . '" ~ ~
'" . u
'" " ::;; i= ~ " .
... ... ... 0
'" ::> ::> " 0 ~ ..
0> Ul "' "5 <J> ~ ~
0 "- "- ... .. <(
N
~ ~ !2: ~ € e E
0;
.
"5
v '" Z
0> N
V V
t; "
. '" "
"' '0- .~ .
;; ct E
N .
, >
~ t- o
:E
"
U 0> "
C .
.~ "E E
0 .
ct , >
t- o
:E
~ " E
" 3 0> 0; "
0
'" :x: e c c ~
<> '" m "E ;;; .
N ro ~ , > S
Q U ... 0
ll. ro :E '"
'" w
"
c-
'" >,::1::2.
.o~
;; " 0, 1.1
N N":':U')
~o..
'"
>. u.S! ~ ..- -
:-:: .~it::S: N
~ 0 (l:l 0--
OO:~3':
t-
>>..ll:: >. \il .
'" (l:l m g !lj U "0
;; ~a..l/)~~e-
Oi6~w~-g~
N :: '5 en ~ I- ::I
1-1- :S
-,
. " ..l t- '" ..l t- '" -' t- o:: ...J t- 0::
> . OJ III III III '" OJ '" '" co co co to
0 E z z Z Ul Ul Ul W W W ~ ~ ;;:
::;;
~
8 C 112
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
"0
2=
co
('IJ
"0
c:
('IJ
C")('!)o 0:: 2
~ ~1 053
66
"" V Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
I~
o .....?
1569-7
603~
>
co
1r
......0......
'<t Ii)
N
('IJ
"0
c:
('IJ
0::
~ 8 C 113
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
~
- l-
.
-
" ""
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Lane Configurations "i + 7' "I, .t., 40-
I_~//' '- 'c'u"" "/'''V'd'''~'"".
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
1~_~IIi_~~I7IIT!IIlI"III~lIli~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
,~!JII~~ .' ~1IlIII
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~.iiifl1iU1jllliilllm'/ -'1alll.ilII_.IIIB"""'l!1_~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
...I~lIL IIIIT 1IJ:_I!IIIIlIIliIIIIfI!1IIIII.l.IIllllli_llri~_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
~II__."'N'/~___~_' ~'-'fiIIIllIIll
Fit Permitted 0.037 0.754
I~~.__.~'[_'P""--~-~._~ --
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~JF'-'''f~M-vlir---~-'.~".....~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
!R _____ill-li...r-/.~,.....,...~
Link Distance (It) 2684 2276 2084 2338
f~~-"-~
Volume (vph) 0 1569 603 66 1053 2 241 0 51 0 3 3
'1 .. . . . ., ,_. i '>', ...""- ". .-. _. "~9';w""... .
Turn Type Perm
----.
Permitted Phases 4 4
,. ' '~"', lP"mlttlfD'Jlt' ','.
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16,0 16.0
.' ,;""",
655
72 1145
2
55
o
3
3
Perm Perm
,- .'~M
..p...._~
8 2 2 6
illIIllIli
16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
.. "4
Total Split (s)
liT "
Maximum Green (s)
113.0 113.0 113.0 113.0 113.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 0.0
, , IrN' r 'lftlllIIIIlIIiMl
21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0
'im_rhi,i,
~!M~k
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
b~__~~-IlDIlr~-
Lead-Lag Optimize?
ilL '>3' .' " ' ,]' ;l;i.,^",iliii_1IIlii
Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
i~ . .
f,:r~J. I, "'"
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
"_'II1l.,_",n "'-bUilil!i!l-~!iIll'iRii'i:I'~!JiiJi!l~i-ill""""-~---''''.-'-'---ii~Bilipi''_~'''.'l
~i!ail1 .91t,Hjl~a<<;W~$_.liIll@L!ilit~!h.,.j~~ ~'lf.!iiff:i0'E~ ..' ~
Act Elfct Green (s) 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
'=. ' "", '. ""'''_'''''....'_'l1I_''HIM't'''Il!_l!;hfjiilil!l'21r..,.-'.''IIi''+.$'''''''0~!jjc'''fjitJ0rr.'
, ,.._l!ll_""'J0H_lli!l__'_"~,
v/cRatio 1.18 0.50 1.33 0.79 1.13 0.18 0.02
iti""-'~il'~'-I-"fullill"ii!rr!"~'-"""--"III' 'l'i1I1"'~iO!d!li!fIi!!7[[jj"'~rrl~.EiHg:w;r"''''!t;2u.''f0~
_e_.,..,___!tiilll1<__1I~___'._!tiJl08Itl\~'?h+iiJiilr,,_""mI,,1l1i!t".
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
""'lilli! H " ,. .~... i!:ij?""fiI"""iiJF.""+"'~ti7iit!EiHJF"".""
It;~~~t:' 0" 1 ,,~,~' .1~0t.!t!il'4nillfil~f;i~tr{ful~~f!t;i~71;~
LOS F A F B F B D
" "
107.0 107.0 107.0 107.0 107.0
, '0:~~ir~'f' ,(,.,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
,
Be
114
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
--"
-
")
('"
-
'-
.....
t
~
'-.
~
.;
Approach LOS E C F D
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max
@ ~ , ~ "",
Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
- .~
#2114 98 #145 724 40 16
"
'-
~
50th %ile ActuatedCycle:~140
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 140 ,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
w
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
." ~l
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Randall Blvd.
I;: :t
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2016 Programmmed Improvements PM Peak
..J- ...... "). f'" ..... '- .....
'ae
116
t ". \.. ~
..;
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0
200 200 200
'~
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~'~LI'~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.~~~~~.[''"I-'"
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.967
-, --~-"."IIlifli!.T'-"'UI~-'lmr'-
Fit Permitted 0.118 0.754 0.967
--.1'.
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft)
2276
2338
"."".,
Volume (vph)
o 1569 603
66 1053
2 241
o
3
3
Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1705
655
72 1145
in
38.0 38.0
2262055033
IIlllllPJBIIIIIIl'Il~_
Perm Perm Perm Perm Penn
Y __"'_!illi;iIi!W01!E"'!!1lj"
;~~ ~~1lll'a;i~gM~ill&w!J_~~ljt?Ji!#,",
4 8 8 2
. .. '.lIii1!11'
16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
ll!I'Jellilii,,.,,CM' . ,,,.. ',0kli'
_;~ifif'L,' "',,,, '. . ,_ ~
38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
.li'lill.&ill'l!hi..~!ii___jiml!lI!Jm_"'dJi
.., '~;;!~b.~Il.~~'UF~
32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
,,:~-r€i~;-:i!!!lIli!JiIIlll'
. ... dfJlt[1'i!!lmH!1~gJi.mMm_i~jffJNjiWfu~~'%J,i0_%7Trii:",", . '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
---.~
11
Perm
"'" '"
=""-,
6
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0
32.0
-;."
All-Red Time (,S) 2.0 2.0
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None
,'}
Max
I ":"
Max
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~~"'.,. .-
32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 18.1 18.1 18.1
" "".im;'''''lr-hil_;~_$_Y.lJijj_'''''21'_'
,~Jiffi1~44~~1!lli~g;,3'~~i9i:' . j
0.61 0.56 0.59 0.41 0.00 0.36 0.33 0.01
I~X_--_"''''U_im~._._.J
~~~fW#I~ ""'. '''' JI!!l[\llit!+''!!'~~'LMi~
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
!I'-;--",,,,"~J~Ai,,,,;;;gIJl!<I11!l:iiill,ji'i<A~~'---ffi!iii'ilO1I1_
,_RIJ1_Hi1&illi~~'!ili~H_!~.,-,,<!,c;;;:r.1jm;_iti$"~!fm~k&~fui7i""''?t~~ffit
A A C A A B B B
Fiash Dont Walk (5) 11.0
Act Elfct Green (s)
vlc Ratio
.-.ililf'----IilI!I1
Queue Delay
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Randall Blvd.
2016 Programmmed Improvements PM Peak
A "' .......<4-A
....... ......... 't' 't' -.....
r 117
Be
<~I
..... t I" '. + ..,;
A A B B
ImJ~Ii'.ll:.I!~
Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Approach LOS
~~_-~-Il
90th %i1e Term Code Max
Jill!
Splits and Phases: 3: Immokalee Rd (CR 846) & Randall Blvd.
"t.z
+,.. 06
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
'at
118
~8C
119
,;
" .
~ ,., '" ~
..; 0 '> J, 0
'" '" i5 0
" .
~
.
E
.
E
'" .
J, ;\ >
'" 0 0
~ m ~ E
m
c
. 'E
l! .
1 ~
" " " ~
'" ~ ~ '" m .
0 '> '> '> 0 m u
"' .; ~ N <0 .; <0 "'
~ N '" i5 i5 i5 ~ N .e .
"
" " " . . c
E E 0
, ~ 0
0 '. "
" > ~
. .
E c ~
0
,; '" ~ 0 . ~ "
'" '" 0 m E ~ u
It: ~ N N . .
~ E €
" . , B
Gi 0
m c 0 ~
;: c ~ 0
E u c "'
, c c ~
~ 0 .
0 N ~ ~ ~ . " j .
m S" 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ " 'm €
- ~ ~ N N ~ "5 ~ ~ "5 ~
III ~ .Q
,; 'x " " .
l" ~ a: ~
It: ~
CIl
GI
iij 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0
0
E
.5 = 0
. u
~ .
. . ~
. . c
.
. m 0
m .
B .
.
~ "'
~
~ .
.
j ~
N ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ is
m S" ~ '" N ~
~ N "
,
c
c
~
0
.
~
'r
"
"
.
0
I
rac
120
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
r-.. -
(")0 ~5
!(
15
J' Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
<.......
if
N~
Q)Q)
--- LO...-
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
raG
121
~ '-
t
I" '. +
Lane Configurations '" 'i r t r 'Ii t
m- .~. 'l___lIQllB"_~}lIlfmHlJilllll.lllllfdlllml!llil_l!lll'II""'''-'
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200
&ill ImTI'_JIIIII~ll.~l~--~liIllII~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
. SF '. . "'z:r1"",i4""ehli!!l!;H"llitli__~...- ii'lIIII' . "W' . " ,'...... 'f!
UM;!lfk!y~g~lIllE. """ 'i
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0
-~._",~_..,- .. ,.. .-. ,"
_~~~m;~.. ~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
... U _....__mlIIW.lliIIIlIIIIIiIIliIliIliIm--.i_IliIII~IIlI. %~--
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
11l1'f_~ _-IB~"'-__pl'-""_._'-III.mJRTr~-~!
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.301
,,-_~~__1iJ3Ji~II' a
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
.. " "'~"I.i!Z'__~liIliIliI3-~--~---'u ~_t
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~~-. "~,
Link Distance (fl) 2008 2194 2217
______.~l~_;"l;:: . . ., '~~rl
Volume (vph) 215 75 592 194 50 237
7'":'0',\'1
'" SiT
Adj. Flow (vph)
234 82
Turn Type
Perm Perm Perm
'" ;,IIr..fif?' .,.8' ;,;. .. .....m..; ~;, ."___i~.
3 2 6
'.IliIIliI~J~"'ll1;I~r._ilI"i"~"IJRI__
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 7.0 7.0
~1IlIriII.:JI_.~_a:__ mT llliIliIliI
Total Split (s) 16.0 16.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0
. .'.. "~l~!ilIUIII;;:""""
Maximum Green (s) 11.5 11.5 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
all'l ""1l1II'i-J,~,_",_~g~~rP_""''''-'''..-%.lII.j'-~-'
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~JIIIIIL~1.RIll\lIIIIIlIii~1II r i1IiIIIilil.ZJ I" ".- ~~"'1J
Lead-Lag Optimize?
'-IIDII~!IIIUIIII~~t'jl'UIIIIIlIiPJ_!l;IiIIII.iiIIIIlIIliI~jl",':'
Recall Mode None None Max Max Max Max
Permitted Phases
",-, - '-~"Xf
Mj
WilsonMiller, Inc.
fac
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
122
~
'-
t
I"
'. +
70th %ile Term Code
30th %ile Term Code
--:r.'!l~~"","':
~J~l^j
10th %i1e Term Code
~~
Queue Length 95th (It)
Natural Cycle: 45
~T"""""""
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
--~~
w.'
A
!lOth %ile Actuated Cycle: 45
~='
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 44.4
~~.,
10th %i'e Actuated Cycle: 65
Splits and Phases:
~"e2
3: Oil Well Rd (CR 858) & Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
i'~3
~~<
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Ifi'
~ Be
123
~ .. ~ ~ ;\ ~
~ ~ ;\ ~
~ ~ c; c; ~ ~
:> :>
is i5 i5 j
" " "
.
"
~ 0 .
;; m <i "
'" .
:;
.
.
.
a:
.
,
.
'" ~ '" I,t); :! ~ c
W
'" ~ ~ ~j " '" .
~ N " 12 ~ N B .
'> c E
> > ..2
Ii Ii Ii . 0
,g>
0 ""
";:
III 0 ~. ~I
c <l. ~,
GI vI "
u :>
l/) i5
III ...
"t:
III
::;: '" all ......;
'" ~j gl
GI "'.
~ ......1
.,;
It: .J:: 0 0' 01
- 0
3: 0 0; 2j ~
Gi '" ~, ~
;: :0' ~i IOj ~ :;
~ ~ 0
~ '. "
0 0 c .
N ~ 12 .
- 1! it " ~
III '~ ,
. 0
,; 0> m. m ~ ~ " .
'" CC!! '" " . ~ 0. . ~
It: 6 0; <0 . '~ . "' . ~
E . a:
GI c .. C ~ ~
0 ~ 0 " ~
.. 0 0; o. ~ C ~
~ 0; 1'--; . "
iij 0> 0; !Xl; . 'e " >
~ c 0.
'" ~ ~j N~ 0 ~ 5 '"
0 N . u 0
~ ~ , C N I .
E c e E
" '> 0 ~ ,
.5 "5 .. m 0 . "
'!! 0 jj ci . >
~ " " ~
"' "' . . '" ~ ~
oj '" . 0
0 " " ~ ~ ~ " .
~ ~ .
'" oj ",' ~ ~ " 0 0 0
'" wi "' "' "5 '" ~ ~ 0
;!: '<t" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
d
, - € " '!: € @' E
, ;;
I .
j u
'" :21 !Ol z
;\ "",!
~l ....1
I
! j
;; .
. .~ "0
0' .
0 0: ~
N "
,:: >
;: 0
"
;; 0 ~
c C
. C E
0' 5 0
0: >
~ 0
"
i5 -g "0 E
i5 .W 0 .
I ~ 0
<; ~ 0, s ;; "
N 0 ~ > E
. 0 ,:: 0 '~
0- < "
'" W
i
h
,Ii Be
124
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
LO -
~(") 85
T( ~()34
j Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
..........
if
(")~
cor-..
--- r-..CD
CD
~
co
0::
()
........
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
rac
...,,~~
.
~
125
~ '-
t
I" '. +
~"~"rr:~~~'<GY~':_1
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200
_...-~~~-<lIIll_ur~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~''''--'''-_ill_I~~
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0
_"-""II.r""'"''_~.ffiWi~'''''
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
II 1[lliIIIIIII~ .I~_ ,. "1fT'1lI[ "~ll IIIJIJR
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
_ ~"""_Il~n.~i.~r'_Ew_a'''''w,..._~
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.118
.. ....In- i1~~~_H' ~ ~ir -,
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
___.....~--_u..l..iIIW~_
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~w~~r"llIIliI
Link Distance (It) 2008 2194 2217
-~
~olume (vph) '" 634 85 783 674 73 345
Adj. Flow (vph)
,
689
92 851 733
79 375
Perm Perm
.'..F_~f
Permitted Phases 3 2 6
- _"""''''''f",,",'>
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 7.0 7.0
IlUIIIlV'"
Total Split (s) 32.2 32.2 37.8 37.8 37.8 37.8
:r--.', , . .-' ,. 'i "i '" ,.
~.. """l\"..~m.mm,'
Maximum Green (s) 27.7 27.7 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
r.l-~'. ,..,]11"'..". ~ . 'j'" lS'.W-l
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
"'-'1IliIIIIIP-1!IIIIIIlr' "~N&il_"'liiirlltmlllli~.~I_..
Lead-Lag Optimize?
1I~-""liIIIIlIlIi.illilllll_IJ:a~~--""-]-
Recall Mode None None Max Max Max Max
, :_.~__IIlIIII\IliIIII__""'-'!
Flash DontWalk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_~rll.~..~j_. '~;:_P,'
Act Effct Green (s) 28.2 28.2 33.8 33.8 33.8 33.8
,,_ '. " "~',' 'wl . ilI~lIlIrj;li'~"m1"'~_R"'iiiUmgillll&&iiII!IIil,!lIllllilll!--1 ....1
~~~ .,. L,m~-=.. ~J4~~~~~.----j ~ ~ iBlJ:OO!1
v/c Ratio 0.97 0.13 0.95 0.64 0.75 0.42
iIIiiilflBllf~~l~HIliIIIl~ill_liIillllllllilUliIliIliI_.
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
__AiUJlti::i':ilj;:r~"'a"""ing'","i" lli"''l>I1JliIUIII''_'''I'''''ii%4I'''"z:rDtl''d'jjifillW"_14.'iit~__..-
~t<"0&gf?Att ._-+ffi!;ur~~~I.llfw~~~l' -- ~_,,~N';11'if~~~R
WS DAD A E B
Perm
,"""- .~
A
WilsonMiller. Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
rae
. :.,,:...'-
~. ('I
126
~
'-
t
I"
'. ~
Natural Cycle: 70
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 70
~~ ~y~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 70
~.,.~--"'.....
~ _.
"" "n "0 _!
10th %ile Actuated Cycle:?O
~
Intersection C.~pacily Utilization 92.2%
OJ""""
ICU Level of Service F
--,.
\1,lik~_
"0$-
~F'
'.-""'-'~1
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Oil Well Rd (CR 858) & Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
~'- t I"'.l
'Be
128
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0
III
-" --'1 ~~III
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
iii II~B ~1._J!'~ JIlIl-a .~1II11!!_111 oU_1
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.272
,l r------_-- ~~ ~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
1.00 1.00
Link Distance (It)
Permitted Phases'
, .
Maximum Green (s) 23.5 23.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 .
UL ~.........
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .
Lead-Lag Optimize?
L ~i_~~~............
Recall Mode None None Max Max Max Max
Flash Dont Walk (s)
Mr
11.0 11.0
Act Effct Green (s)
21.6 21.6 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.1
'"
s
v/cRatio 0.86 0.12 0.44 0.69 0.41 0.19
., :'-IIJ"I'IIlIIIr__liIIlf~j_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_r"-~."!UlIJlll~~""il~!1i',j!li""lI,,-iii\::'I!'_il!F_---_"'_W_'1lii:li_~d:_)lj_".1i&I!
~.~",~!a!i!i5'U?imf'21J~~M!.j~rEgK~~.~~I1lli~~~
WS CAB A C B
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'ac
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
~ '- t I" '.
129
90th %ile Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
.
10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
#336 24 96 58 #52 43
200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 50
!H _"~!iII!!IlJiJllllilllil'''''''.~IIli__~,ldgfl.''''-----''_M_MM-
Natural Cycle: 50
",~---@y"'''. ---
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
~~~.~_.~.~'-- ,m~1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1 % ICU Level of Service C
':%Jl:I"...'lrda''''...... ...
~~.L_lliBJj"~: ..
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50
"'.,.._,.."'."~_~liI.'~IliI"_M' '.....,
. .~.. .', ., l~.', lk~' ;- " . ;"
. ,,~. . ..-'
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 50
. ".~~_lf~'ffi'-~"-lllllil!I_III.llf..--..--..~
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 40.9
.""';;v
Queue shown is maximu;;' alter two cycles.
('-'.~,~..-. ._,
- )\'-">"
'"
~:.. ,"M"
3: Oil Well Rd (CR 858) & Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
It.
::,:
~~---,,-
...,
WilsonMiller, Inc,
'ae
130
on '" ... '" 0 0
0 ;:0 .. on on ..
.. .., c; c; ~ ...
:> ~
15 c 15
'It 'It 'It ~
~
"
N! '" en1 -, .
1O~ M ..;I"j ~j "
"' .
c
0
.
.
.
0:
e
,
.
~j 0 ~ '<ti ~1 0 c
.. '" -, 0> W .
co~ N 'V~ c; ~ c; Nl '; .9 .
:> :> c E
. 0
is is is . :g
0 0
'It 'It .. ~
.;: () .E
..
c: (;j 0:
Gl M.
l.l M, to,
......_; lOj c; M;
Ul ......; :>
,; .. is
II:: ';: ..
..
Gi :::!E
:: Gl 1,('); 1O~ ~:
~ co: (D;
I"--~; co; <O~
is ......-;
~
- - ~
~ ~
.. O! g1 gi ~
,; 0' "
CD v; .....; 0; 0 ~
ai' ai~ 1'--1 " ~
II:: " ~
... -, -, e c
Gl 0 I- ,
N -'" 0
Gl '. ()
'j;j . 0 .
.
.0:: E " 0 0: "'
0 , . I<' 0; C
" 'e- o
E 0> 0>, 0> co; > e ~ 0
coj a); '" ~; a. I- ()
.5 oi ci1 ci vi C .. -'" '" .
. '"
E '. '. .
~ . 0:
c .. 0 u. E
0 0; 0 0> i () 0;
.. c 0
"' t{}; u;: <{ 0 " a.
"'. ("); <{ . '2 '" >
N 61 u c '"
N; I<' 0 a. 5 '"
. N . ~ 0
.= " 0 c r .
c 0 N E
.. . " e 0> ~ ~
.. 0 .
'0 !'l. u ~ <0 . "
l- I<' u " a. >
'" '" . . '" ~ ~
'" '" .= '" . u
~ ~ .
l- I- l- e
::> ::> ~ 0 0 ~
'" '" '" ;:; ~ ~
u. U. I- a. <{
::. ~ e ~ € ie: to:
.
~
'0
z
13 "'
. 0> C
on B c .
<; Ii. 'c "
0;
N oS ~ >
I- 0
;: '"
,
;:; 0> C
c .
!!!. E E
0 .
Ii. 0 >
I- 0
'"
" 'C E
0 c
0 , 0> " .
"' r e c E 2
<; '" 0> 'E . .
N . ~ ~ > E
. 0 I- 0 ~
a. . '"
"' w
~
!
09
H
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
'ae
132
~ '-
t
I"
'. J.
200 200
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (It)
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-~~~M
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
- -jlllllillill~ '-rrIlMllIlliIIIIIllliJl!llllIImll'III,,'d 1_11I
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.103
11IIIII i"'Il-"""'ilIllllUll:.I~~'- liIIIlIIII
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
jK
.
"
~ 0'"' '~,
Act Effct Green (s) 33.0 33.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0
I -~__~'-~_lliII'~'w,!~_
v/cRatio 1.13 0.14 1.08 0.78 1.01 0.55
" '
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
'"II__~Hlll'ili1_~_]!F.Mljl"'''?lIl!.''~'!BD\_
-- .. ., ':,~0J"g~~h%J~.~RP~+_!!f~~~ftjjf~,",~
LOS F A E A F B
,,,,AW
WilsonMiller, Inc.
" Be
.ll~
,-
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
133
~
'-
t
I"
\. +
nJlll!l_~,_'-"'.X$~- ~--"""I'
'f'\ji~:" v'
v'
". ,
,
;F,x ;,oo"UM I -,_.
','''' , , ,"'."','.,.".- -.-
.~;:h::";>:;,-';'1i>3 ~iIIi
'-'lOliiil\!!!!
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1,13
~le~ili:~---,yIli--'
Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.6% ICU Level of Service G
" . '1= ., ""liir"lllll~iI~
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80 '. ' ~' '..
___r""~iIl~-~tiliTillllIL'llIi1ili">C~ w'imnr'llllllllll
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 80
_o;~IIII'f_Iii__-W~~Ji&iliIiII.lkl~~-
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 80
~JRlMlllil.~->B~iIfIIIIIiIb.~'"-''' r' ..
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
" ".." "2 " >"'2.jlllii!~
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
r:E" ~ '0"' We" "{OR ""3-;: " (CR~"
,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'Be
134
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
ctl
~
0
E
E
(") -
CDr-.. ~O
~!~~ ~60
,/ Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
iiir
LO (")
o ...-
--- Q) co
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
"Be
135
~ '-
t
I" '. +
200 200
200 200
"m&1ff T
,F
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~.~-- "-'--1W--~~~--'11_""""".~.
Trailing Detector (Il) 0 0 0 0 0 0
___-IilIl!!"'" iJl~-~~-~-------
Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91
1liIIIIrnr-w---"'lIliIIIIiliilB_i III _ 11m '1.111I-'--'-
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
I '-_IlI-'IIlIT.~~_."---.r._IliII..[r011""'
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.211
. ....-- - -~-~._~~ ----- 1lI11l11~'-1IIil' i:l'l.
Ri9ht Tum on Red Yes Yes
~---~~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (It) 2008 2194 2217
~--~--.lliIiJIi'1l
Volume (vph) 760 90 905 813 87 463
~~~"-"-~-!I-
Adj. Flow (vph) 826 98 984 884 95 503
I
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm ..
.."""___"=F'
Permitted Phases 3 2 6
J
Minimum Initial.(s)
10.0 10.0 16.0
10.0 10.0
!otal Split (s)
23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
'1J .' ~'"",'
27.5 27.5 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
,"'~~I_IIIIliIIfT-~'-""
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~_.liIIlmIil!1lII~-
Lead-Lag Optimiz~?
~aximum Green (s)
~, - *-~
'%'~o/H"'; . ,
, ,', a 'I
Recall Mode
None None
Max Max Max
Flash DonI Walk (s)
-.-...--
'lill'- ""'.l~' :~- ~."WIII
.. ,
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
. ...... F '.~ol~iiil!l!.'. ,.,.
Act Effct Green (s) 26.9 26.9 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
~'1:1!lIl!IIf.li_JiIIiI&_m,' ....
v/c Ratio 0.94 0.12 0.55 0.78 0.68 0.28
, '~~i11li11ll1
_" _ m_J~WJ.. ,;
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'Be
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
136
~
'-
t
I"
'. +
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code
Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
:']
50th %i1e Term Code
Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
1F"........,.~I.r~.,....I'~~I_~
10th %i1e Term Code Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
1110 ",~m.~-""",,,_.IIIIIr""IIIlIf~''''Ii.;i.11I
Queue Length 95th (It) #451 31 127 #109 #96 64
--_.r'~-'-~~""lI'Jl~I!_IIlIII-'1lIII_11
Turn Bay Length (It) 200 200 200 200
~~II IIIIlIIIIIIIliI
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
. r_1Ijjf-_lll:<"".lIIilli'Iii!l-~Mt,-
--~_i1h, ~~~~
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
~_.' ""lIiIIIiIIIIIIIlllJRIB
Cycle Length: 55
;~ <~I'w:'",f
, "'''"','_..../
Natural Cycle: 55
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94
-Ji!0......,-'~
""('
u;'"
Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9%
~.......,..".. 'I "
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 55 . , .
j ~-~1IIIiIIr~-'1I1111111li1l111l
50th %ile Actuated Cycle:..55
ICU Level of Service D
~elE
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 49.5
1-~-~~__1lIIIiIlIIIIIlI
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
it)
Splits and Phases:
~~
3: Oil Well Rd (CR 858) & Immokalee Rd (CR 846)
-::r"
:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~ac
138
,;
" .
" N '" E
'> ,
'" N 6 8
'" '" Ii ~
.
.
.
.
~
.
E
.
'" '" '" >
'" '" " '" 0
~ ~ N E
a
c
. 'E
l! "
~ .
~ ,;
~ '" ~ " " " '" ~
'" " '> '> '> 0 .
gj "' .; " .; a u
N ~ <0 i5 Ii \i 6 m " .
" . ,;
'2 c
E 0
5 .. 0
'. g
" >
. .
,; E c ~
0
~ '" '" . ~ '.
It: ~ ~ 0 ~ E ~ u
'" N . .
III ~ ~ "
"; " , B
m 8
GI c 0
~ E c
,
C. ~ .
E '" '" ;l; m " " 0 0 ~ ~ :
'" ~ N 0
III '" "0 <
() . ~
. ~
,; Q
.
It: ~
..
GI " 0 " " " 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~
iij <0 6 ..; ..; ..; ,..; ~ ,..;
-"
0
E
.5
B
l
~
i
0 ~
0 0 " N 0 :! 0
..
,
c
c
~
0
.
0
"
'r
~
..
0
!
!.
,!
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
r ac
140
if '-
t
I" '. l
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Walking Speed (flIs)
. "'" ~.~1IIBIIIIIII!~
Right turn flare (veh)
· 1III1~lllf!IliIllp-~IIII"__ _.
Median storage veh)
r ~_____ il~ I IlIIli .- II~
vC 1 , stage 1 cenf vol
. II--'.~"- TTIIIlIliI
""'11 ~ llllllP' 1 ~'!II
Average Delay 3.3
llmll""U~~~~I,l"_ ...... 1fIIIll!I&-~'~ ~I'''''''''''~'' 0'&
Analysis Period (min) 15
.;,....---11.
WilsonMiller, Inc.
,;
It:
III
";
::!
Q.
E
III
o
,;
It:
..
GI
iij
'"
o
E
E
-j ~ ~!. ~],
~l In...
'" illl
N "#"1
I ;: r--1 .....j
;; "', ~j
~
j
! Mi
r--l
l :1f,
i~
i
!
(0;
~j
~!
oj
0,
21
ad
'00;
! cd
! !
;
~!
~'
h,!
! ~j
iOOj
.
~l ~l ~
O~ iSl e
.'1 -= -
~i ~i S
0; oj, 0
'*ti'fi: 'it
!I
.....!
:gj
..-!
8l
CC!.1
.....,
m!
<<I;
0;
m!
<:0;
c:i!
~j
0;
ri!
......j
i
o.J
(0:
(D!
."
'-j
61
01,
N'
N!
Ni
'!
Ni
N;
;
,0;
em;
~l
j
!
6J
.....!
.....i
raG
141
m
..:J
'"
N
~
~
~l
~i
0:
0;
Nj
~ .
~
~ 0 .
~ " 'ijj
'. .
0 . . ~
. " a: E ~
~ . i! . , .
~ 0 0 "
~ . "
~ ~ " . .
E . '" "' !}. ~
. '. '. . ~
E ~ 0 ~ E .
c .. U g , ~
a c '5
Ji ~ . .
. e " > "
0 g ~ , "'
~ u 0 .
N ~ C N r E
~ U c e ~ ~ ,
" . :> . '5
.. 'I! .,; . >
" ~ 0 ~ " ~ ~
~ ~ '" ~
. 0
"' "' '" .
" " ~ ~ b ~ e
~ ~ " ~ 0
~ ~ " "' ~ 0
:i' "' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ " € to
- g '"
"
.
"
Z
en!
co;
o!
~I
,
a i
i"
i :;:
, !
hi
rac
142
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
---
CD
'<t
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
<D
<tl
~
0
E
E
r--.C')-
LO~ ~~9
!(
l / Camp Keais Road
f'...
if
...-~
OC')
--- r--.
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
<D
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
raG
143
~ '-
t
I" '. +
Lane Configurations
v
t r- 'I t
1., '1.!!I"!ii.jj",~-","---'1!"'UIIlI'
^"~E[!w~%tfmL,,,
0% 0%
4%", "PJ
Grade
0%
>;'i!)' X '"
Peak Hour Factor
~~ ~~ O~ ~~ ~~ O~
Pedestrians
. GlMlIIIIill_mmm_._~~~
Walking Speed (fl/s)
I _1!i~l__R1ftIIir-~lIiI~ 0..11111 P
Right turn flare (veh)
1'1 I~n 1~1:NI _mT"1lll_"l.~'JRlwPlll..~~T~~ nllllfi1~'~'
Median storage veh)
IiII &11,-. ...,~iIi~. _Jr7"'~'.1~ ~1lP I ~ ~_I _
pX, platoon unblocked
~__~'m~~
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
- ~-. ,.-'._-.,w-lIIIIfrll ...._~ '
vCu, unblocked vol 2222 762 799
k'''-' ,;;;""""',"-
o
"fill""'"
"
o
pO queue free %
28
o 0 590 0
~;~~.IliI!O'-'i1l!~' -11III
170 1700 1700 824 1700
: 7'__ L ~__lIIIIlf.llillllllllli:IJIIliIII'.1fIlrI!1F-
o 0 156 0
.. ~"_,'_lrjl~Q'-I"1i4~Mltili3,.""s..m"'I-_
b~~h"".." ,~_ ~~~~~
Lane LOS F C
~[lIIliI:IIIJIliO-""'1lT_;l_vi_'._._~<IliF'-
Approach LOS F
24
Volume Lelt
, tm',
cSH
1138
Average Delay 220.9
-~-Ii!IIlIII.li.&llilillllfl:",~.IIlIIIlI_IIIlIi:lftln,'-" -_
Analysis Period (min) 15
!lii',_m_d!1Bli!'-I'I-li""~-.""li!~::s&1i"S;ii!lkftL'lliUiw'Il'JlIlll.ii"""'-'"'" .'iGI*r,ss"'...."IJ__TI1YiL"'_~"_." ",
l#iI~~ '~~~V~!~~_l" hr' ,_ijbiB~fill~li2M@i&L~~i ~~iJ~~"
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'ae
144
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
r-..(")-
LO~ ~~9
J1~
J' Camp Keais Road
"-
iir
...-~
0(")
--- r-..
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'aG
145
~ '-
t
I" '. ~
tt
"':_.IIIliIliIlIIDI.lt'..~~
Storage Length (It) 200 200 200 200
~ ..~.1-:v'4~1IIII!8I.Qk-__lIIIliIi_.H.-."""'_
Total Lost Tim". (~) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:2, 4.0 ,.... .,
"0"'.
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0
_- g_.--_'l!'-lIlIIIlIIIIIllI*_._--'''-I!I'!!''-'--~f'--
Lane UtiL Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
0- lili"'--'lIIII.r'_.III.~~""B_lEliIllr.
Fit Protected 0.998 0.950
~!~ . IlilIllUlliiUllli'II'~~.--
Fit Pennitted 0.998 0.182
", 1IlI.1I'IIlI~-. ""-Ii,I~IIIIIIIl!I"~mrr - .. td-T-IlIll1]1IIII~~ ..n
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
--~-~-~~~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
..._~-~~---- -1111111l1l1__'--.
Link Distance (~2 3154 2005 2217
Volume (vph)
22 439 701
34
^~ '''6.
Adj. Flow (vph)
24 477 762
37 590
Turn Type
~
Pennitted Phases
1- ""mT~j!i11Jl~
Minimum Initia.1 (sL
Penn pm+pt
,"~
".._~~~
:_t'
~m"
2
6
'iiir-
T" .,,,,,
16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
..,.~
16.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 44.0
.. .., . "JlIMlllllllllllililllllll.__
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 17.5 38.0 .
"'_ 1l!Il1lllli'~1"!IP'!llllm_j~"M__."\l?''''''..1lt-_Y_II1!-'-'TII_.
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
~i_"'~1IlIn_."~'.~-_liIIBI_
Lead.Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
1I '''1IIliI:''~Jii!:''f ...~_i__
Recall Mode None Max Max None Max
... .. "...-.."'..'. ... .,.. . "--'_lillsm;_l>DI1l!l1!_:_'Et"'GL_:n<r__lliIiIk'l!8
~ !il~~' ~ jfiR~lU!i__~_j.~g~~ ..~~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0
-'111'-'.... ..,. .. ," ," ...."'__,..._.,_---"'...."j::-tltlf-&2...
~!' ,,,'i. .' ,ilW~~tJff1lr4nmM~ .. !t~D?Jij~~Q~__f'~ ',._ ,,~.
Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 18.8 18.8 40.0 40.0
if._, lilrJl'ii,1lt!j il:>'_"..,"_""'l!I'..i__~"..r""IMl!i'.f_"''''!ilii.~'TifA'liiil''~'O::&li'''I'jr:'fu\J._:bl...'"~".''''i!iiiigp'''iJi!i!''''i'l'iIIliii
NM .~~~~~iH_~'Maf~~d1~M~!{\!'J~~Wn'_R~fD~C~""" f~~
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.69 0.07 0.93 0.12
10.0
V~,f '
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'ae
146
~
'-
t
I"
'. +
Approach LOS
A
C
C
90th %ile Term Code Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
-."..
70th %i1e Term Code Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
Queue Len9th 95th (It) #85
~'"
Turn Bay Length (ft) 2~O
30th %i1e Term Code
50th %i1e Term Code
Max
MaxR
10th %i1e Term Code
200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn
iii
Storage Cap Reductn
o
o
,
o 0 0 0
.:.__...~~
o 0 0 0
~~lr '
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93
,
Intersection CapacityUti!!z,ation 87.8%
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
Y:H' m."
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 60
'" "''V =
ua T ,.. ".
1 oth %ile Actu~ted Cycle: 60
Queue shown is maximu;" alter two cycles.
WilsonMiller, Inc.
.. .. .. '" <> >:
<> <> .. .. ..
.. ~ .. '" ;;; ~ ;;; on
:> 2
is is c
.. .. ..
.. " 0 N
'" .. '" on
on on
'" '" '" N; '"
0 '" 0>,
.. Ni c; c; ~
); );
0 0 0 0
.. .. ..
'i:
..
c N ml
Gl N 0;: -I
u .. "', e
-c:i III >
It: .. 0
.. 'i: ..
'i; ..
Gl ::!1
::.:: Gl N '<;f", 0:)1
> ... -' NI
a. < N. N_i
E .....j .
.c '.
.. .
- ~
0 ~ ~
0 0; 81 E
- 0 0' .
.. CD on Ni MI u "
M M"' E . .
-c:i .... -' . c ~
C> i= 0 ~
It: N 0 ~
'" u
Gl '. .
Gl . 0 .
OJ E U u 0: .
0 . " c
.... "', '" m! <5 B E 0
'" ~ ~ 0
0 .. IX); .. co; > Ii: .... u
E ci 01 ci ci! c .. '" 0. .
. '"
E '. '. .
E ~ . 0:
0 .. 0 ~ E
0 0; 0; .. .:i 1l u 0 "
.. '" ~~ Ji 0 :g 0.
co; . B "
.0 ;:f u c Ii: " 0.
E ~ '"
. "' u 0
i= ~ 0 I .
U 0 0 N E
.. . :E e .. ~ ~
15 .. .. 0 . :g
~ u ~ ci .
.... E u " 0.
1 on '" . '" ~ ~
, ~ .. . u
oi 01 " " .... ~ " .
0 "', l! .... .... jij .... e
S; 0; ::> ::> 0 0 ~
..-; '" '" 0 '" :l ~ ~
N; ~~ ~ ~ .... 0.
, - ~ is: :!: ~ € to:
0;
..
0
"', Z
<D
.. lO,
~ (");
~ .
u
. '" C
<D '0' c .
- Ii: ." E
"
N :; .
oS >
.... 0
;: :;
.
u .~ c
.
,~ E
e :; .
0. >
.... 0
:;
:; u c E
c
0 0 '" . "'
'" I 0 c E 2'
- S, c
<> ~ . .
N 0 ~ :; > .%
. u .... 0
0 :;
0. '" "'
OJ
..
-
"
N
>,5M"
~ 0 ;:-
" s,;:
N"t(/)
.0.
'"
>. (,) .~
::::: .~:::
.00
00:'::
~
o
;:
o~
.
....
<D
~
<>
N
s
f;'~C~l,)OO
s~~~E~
o(ij~~E-o
;:ocn:>l-c::
........ >
~
6 'E
> .
~ E
rac
147
_...1
-' .... << -' .... 0: -' .... 0: -' .... 0:
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
z z z if) on if) OJ OJ OJ ;: ;: ;:
!
"'
H
raG
148
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
NCD-
Q)CO ~b1
D:
/ Camp Keais Road
"'-
if
Q)Q)
00
--- co...-
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
0
E
E
-
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
raG
149
~ '-
t
I" '. +
Lane Configurations'" t r 'Ii +
~1IIIIIIliI~_l_r~.ll_~llllllll._1
Grade 0% 0% 0%
~!0P" ,,'lIlmrjlrrrl~~~"'_Ull2WjJ!lr.~
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
"~iI,__r<-~'___ItfJRII.
" _liIIIIF-~-
Walking Speed (fl/s)
l~liIIIl-~IIII"'lrJlJll_.~$__I'n.llllll_B:IIIIIIIlIliII!Il
Right turn flare (veh)
1m .1 Pllli11ll__~tMlmllllll~"R r "
Median storage veh)
_ _._.J.Jl n~"'~~'r- ~"""'--I_lIi11ll111"'1J m"'IIIIIIIr'-~~rllr
pX, platoon unblocked
~illlI-vlllllllllllllll"-~IIIIliI_r_1II111L.;JAll-
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
Pedestrians
""#
12' "
vCu, unblocked vol
2688 879
. '"Ie' ,n
998
"01.
" ,'''' ....."11'':'.
,-
0...."!~
~~g
~o queue free %
o
o
o
Volume Lelt
98
o
o 746
o
cSH 0 1700 1700 694 1700
- f~' 1 If..C':;:', 'G
Queue Length 95th (It) Err 0 0 507 0
P,..LI."~""_"_!O:'h]@.llfiIl1~~_'i1li"i~'\!A,MJ:_lli!i]1illiii&W.t"lIil-lDd~i0-.i!___II~-'4'
__~~gr;g~li1t:~~~5fjfi!1~*iillt~~~".,~~~~~ ~,
Lane LOS F F
.. '-T'" , ''If''*~''_,.''''!I,,qli'''NliJKi_'W'';<'' " diS"k1,,!iljl"m"'~Th'''' ""
,.JII0ft~~~iI;~~~'t, L'
"!.'li""*__'ti':l1""' "
~a
Approach LOS
F
Average Delay Err
lV--...~_a'Oi'*"'__glllrr' "--.11:11.._
Analysis Period (min) 15
IlliiljjlilBJlIfliIII..JI_I..I..____'_~tll'iIII_
WilsonMiller, Inc.
raG
150
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
<tl
~
o
E
E
NCD-
Q)CO
~1(~
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
---
CD
~
co
0::
()
'-'
~b1
j Camp Keais Road
'"
iir
Q) Q)
00
co ...-
-c
0::
Q)
Q)
co
~
o
E
E
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
'Be
151
~ '-
t
I" '. +
tt ,.... 'f'" k' ~~,.., ,:-tJ'>itj>;'.""'F""iiii410'Jij't::fiJ!j,",a':JR:4:h'tA":h~jjj_~
. . '":_~.;lill:K~u~4fl~fllic7+Rrf~ry~~~;~
Storage Length (It) 0 0 200 200
J;, --IIIII'II,Ll "1II_~~III""""Il-II-''''I-:E'~~~*!1if~!jj~jl!j''':hJ0ili'il;lf-'''--1IIIII"
""" ~__._i"", m~~ m:;dJ~_",tm ~""_#i':.!!resl.5&l~L"0I"d,,,,,,,,",,,,,,,,,~!IIJt~~~~J!,,~,,
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .
~__"~.IIIIIIII!Jtlll~liIliIm.lI\lIIIlIIIII-mEI~
Trailing Detector (It) 0 0 0 0 0
.' -i~"-.."'1_I.1IIIiIIIIr'-~~"-"""'iil$--~1I::
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95
Lane Configurations
v.
. ,
"'#ill
,
%" it;"J(
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
IiiIIII1IIIIlIII_lllU_'-~..IIIlIIIf~lll11""'-
Link Distance (It) 3562 2005 2217
- i~-"~lIIIIi"____"iIliI___1IlIIIIIII
Volume (vph) 90 571 809 109 686 292
~~I!IIliIIIIII1fi1'11111lIlil..IIII.r!llI!lJ'
Adj. Flow (vph) 98 621 879 118 746 317
~-~~-~Bl____ I......,.
Perm Prot
K'" '~_~'~~'~:' >'~,
2
" .,' . ,7'__"_jllllllillil~~:f_lIll"_i.
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0
D~1I11Irr-'lm:!IIIII':Il1Irrrr!t'~--r'''l!lIilJRllll__"lIIIIIll--_
Total Split (s) 22:0 0.0 23.0 23.0 20.0 43.0
'''''i>l'''I'f_Il'',;sIllJ;j!.iiiiii,''.mkl\\',i&,''''~'l'',U I'.....',
~~~~.~0<',
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 17.0 17.0' 15.5 37.0 ,.., ....
1'~aJ_.lf~~E,."n',,""'"
AII.Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
." "'_u_&~'!'-....._...,~' ,
,~*",,~~ml! ..
Yes Yes Yes
'--.j-~'
Recall Mode None Max Max None Max ',. ."
'_illilllll._~'11k_'_iill&l<iti$~_'IE&'L"A1lliillllllll"'~ilZln"'E'l!l"""v" . ' .,.N'
~!~~~JkWJ~~d,'[n~Atr&J!'jRii2~W~ ~ ;'"
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0
",' ,. : jjI~iIil.7"~ii"Ej(i:jj'!lfijlllljlf!,*i81i!!ill!_-~'Cfu---'iIliI
.d"'....$_~l"""I_M....,,.__..!!ijm~.r__'l!,'
Act Effct Green (s) 16.7 19.3 19.3 15.7 39.1
1111"-11 BI!"'-III"III'IB~"'.~.1lII1lIIIIlIIIIIl.iIliIiIliIIIliIl
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.82 0.21 0.88 0.15
!IIII -~I[!II.IDlIIIIlIIIIlIII'..l1iQIiii"'~tlil~.m:IiiIIIlIlI_mmllt~41..tm_:l!lr~lfi_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~--'~"~~lliIj,i1i1~,"'jil"j~!gs~ililili"""",,~j1~l1l11'~il1i!1ll1'iill:jlj~j1i~"':r:il:<:f"'1IIi!ii1lli.jifE1':J:~~1*i:il:<liiWi"tiil!liI'"'
{!------ ~~~",~J.'fBH&~",,,,,,,",,,~,,,,,_,:t8';,_)r0>,,,,",,,,,,,,,,"S)~ff!'Jfdw7ffiL_,,,,-<i0,,,,P10",.'Y0.h,,,,,-.f11'!*a%h,,i{g]liillflgillLd'Mi:W;"')~~_~Y ____
LOS C CAD A
',;;'''''',
. '."
Permitted Phases
"-"0'
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'Be
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
152
~ '-
t
I"
'. +
C
90th %i1e Term Code
__ 'n
70th %i1e Term Code
Max MaxR MaxR
UIIIIIlIIIIiII-....
Max MaxR MaxR
Max MaxR
'"
Max MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
_,iil - I!'~_.' -.....__..- .IIUIIIII. ~--mlll1 _r--~
30th %i1e Term Code Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
~- 1illll~..t.i!Ii-':rr~_",...._m1lf .'~-"'mml_
10th %i1e Term Code Min Hold Hold Gap MaxR
"" ll,~ 1IlIIIIIIIIlIlI_~-1_-~""'1I"
Queue Length 95th (It) #304 #267 32 #240 41
I ~1IIfjl"""'-.'III~.lIllr.'~- ."II~liIliI_III"
Turn Bay Length (It) 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
11IIn ~~1W~11~__1III--""-"tIII._.
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
, ,"I::'
"4'
Jh,'
Natural Cycle: 65
ilII1JIII'!81[1 "
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
--I.~~I~:'"
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.2% ICU Level of Service F
~.... _fiiili'iiiiii_lRJW__i@l_IIit__,' ,
~~&mlm!N%~Stlg;];f1Y~m%~mmi:Hllimmmr~[lif11f401'.",i\'
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 65
'''41 "!' , _')' '+" ~
ifi ,-'-"
""".
#' i
G
IliIII
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 65
, ""''''' ,'" ..' ...."
"'J' ~,
,
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 59
1 WINt --
'8_
Queue shown is maximum alter two cycles.
I~':"" '"~,
+ e6
"'
Wilson Miller, Inc.
~
~ " m E
'" << .; .; 8
m ~ m ~
.
.
.
.
E
.
E
N .
;z ;z ~ ~
~ N
~ ~ 0> E
~
e
2 ~
.
~ .
~
~ ~ 0> 0> m ~ m ~ e ~
"! 0> ~ .
m '" ...: << :i ~ '" << ;! ~ ~
~ ~ m ~ :;: ~ ~ .
~
1! . e
~ .0
, .. 0
c;;- .0 .~ E
u . ~
N .. e
" .0
Ii ~ 0> m ~ . ~
;1; m ;Z N E ~
N ~ .
ui >
.0
- ~
... ~
e
III .~
l: ~
'OJ N ;; 0> " " ~ " ~ 0> ~ W
:;; ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
N N N N ~ re
- .
'" ~
CD
....
ex>
Ii ., ., ~ ~ ~ w w w " 0 0
<< << << << << << << << <<
!:t
...
III
-
..
~
s
1:
~
.
~ ~ 0> 0> 0> m ~ ~ 0> ~ W e
w ~ ;! ~ w 0 "
N N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~
..
,
e
e
<
.!!
,
"
~
3
..
.
Q
'Be
"
.'"
~:S
<i .
.0
(5
e I-
e c
":;'i
in .0 ~
. .
~t:)o::
50
.0_
U
<; .
Ole
M :t: e .
" :. 2 E
" 5 .
N . >
. ~ .0
~ :2:
M
"
"
N
.
, "
~ ,
. .0
rot)
'"
_i
"
.
E
.
>
.0
"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ ~ 0:: ~ ~ 0::
W m 00 00 W 00 00 00 w m m 00
Z Z 2 ~ ~ ~ w w w ~ ~ ~
154
I
.
!
!o
.j
'aG
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
156
~
-
"
.
-
,
.....
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Total Lost Time (s)
200 200 200 200 200
--
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~R~~-
LaneUtil. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
111 ...-'~~---
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.994
- - n-r- ~~.![mn!.llm_r.;::JFr,.,,-
Fit Permitted 0.553 0.573 0.553 0.938
--- -......~--1T~-- .. II~ml- ~'~_I
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~____ii~
Volume (vph) 287 270 88 79 303 46 74 272 201 29 150 80
~~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 312 293 96 86 329 50 80 296 218 32 163 87
M 'rm>i>_.. - __
_III Perm Perm __!f'df!!
"...'l!il\llf~-~~---
_ ~""?1;ML}%~~~~I$;IIt~
2 6
"U1~""""""jem '" -
Perm
Perm Perm
Perm Perm
Turn Type
0!
Permitted Phases
4
4
8
8
2
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
'--
Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 22.0 22.0 22.0' 22.0 22~0 0.0
. r__liwjt'liL,",iilllli_,sg-._
.}t~-il~~~~~",_ _'"~
Maximum Green (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
-; '.' 11'-..
-...li -
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~_i1fiIIIl_I'mjiil.llL~_'..illlil!lllllllll
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None None None
None None Max Max Max Max Max
,,_._ ~ 'M(
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
, ....
ActEffctGreen(s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 21.1 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.1
Dl!l'UlIIIIIlliIIfiilllllllllllil~llIIlIlIIlIIIHIIIg_'.IIIaIllIliI_._
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.19 0.13 0.18 0.21 0.07 0.20 0.42 0.29 0.42
_!lli~UII[.~UID~IlIfi'JIlIIIiiIIIIIIiill!illl
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
__""_"'l!i!lIjlllii_ll!A""7_i'i'4ill_\iir"'Iirl_Iili_",.,,,Yjj"E<i_9?"IIlkli1.,,,,,~""mrapiltl,g__ffit"iil,",'.Ilk'\(~g_
~;MNU~~~f4td~~~mrw~_~!?9~;, ~Z!~~~~t~~l;jjllg~~~it&!m!~~WSt~l
WS B A A A A A B B A B
Flash Dont Walk (s)
f. ~
w' ,-."
WilsonMiller, Inc.
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2004 Existin9 Conditions PM Peak
~ - "
"Be
157
.
-
, '\
t
/'" \. ~
.'
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
II
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code
Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code
Min Min
10th %ile Term Code
Min Min
Queue Length 95th (ft)
41 117
33
101
Turn Bay Length (ft)
200
200 200
200 200
200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_~li ..li'....III:~i
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1il~'I~",,_...I
.._ I _
Cycle Length: 50
1iIlr-~jl_--~---lIl1lIl1LlllliII~._,iII._
Natural Cycle: 50
,~c, .~.....' '1ll1llllllllllli_iIIIIlIlril-liilllllllr'-."'-
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68
!~1I '.11. ~ ...
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C
_~iIII1II1iIIIiIr..J1f':''''
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50
F~IIn.__ .=,' '~H' .". . 'iV' "5.lIl1lii11li'
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 47.9
lUillII!IiiiiiJilm!'''''',",~-i'''I''\i'iIlI_'''' .5,Wi'" ..
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 44
"---.' _W-"~"'ill<"_>l"_"_&!R1_""C(;l"'i__01!JfL_"'.kma"b""'" ..
_, ~1I!e~~r2~~li"
Queue shown is maximum after two' cycles. ' e_' ,
..
6.iJl
'ft',
"I
; if,
,:,
. ,,~' ,. ..~
Splits and Phases,
~:
3: W. Main St. (SR 29) & N. 1st. St.
:0084
:" ~
=1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
;I' ~ ~ ~ OJ! M w ~ M
N ~ N' :: ~ N N
.
0
E
,
."
,>
~ .!:
~, N 0 ~ iil ;; ~j ;j, ~ ;; 0; w ~
~~ ~ M ~ ~ ;~
N w vi w
I So
g:.!!
~~
0 ~ <
'':; u g
0 0
.. 0: 0 U')! m 0
I: ~, ~ ~i ::l ~o:
Gl t--: N
U ":j
/f)
..
'':;
..
0;- :;; coi N]
~i 01
N Gl m)
Ii ~
!i J:
- gj ~J j!
... ~ r--i .
/f) Nj m] . ~
~ -, ~ ,
~ 0
I: ~ I u
'C; 0 . .
N 0 0 12
:;; E ~ 0 " .
, e .. . < N
- , " . ~ 1: .
.. CD! ll'!! en! mi > 0- != u ~
(Q ~, CI); CO, ~ . ~ " . ~
ci' ...., cij cij 0 "
.. E ~ " 0 12
< .. 0 ~ E
CO m < ~ U , .
Ii 0] oj 01 01 .. <{ 0 " 0-
t--i Ni 0; <{ ~ ';, ~ >
!:t C\!.j 1.0; 1O! lI)i j! 0 0- "
'oct; to! riJ "ll ~ , "
-, Nj N] " N " < 0 .
!= u , N "
< , E
... .. . '> e m ~ ,
/f) " .. Jl' 0 . "
<'?- 0 0 0 >
~ .. 0 " 0-
- " " . . ~ ~ ~
III m . 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ e
=> => .. 0 0 ~
" " " " :? . ~
~ ~ ~ 0- ~ <{
- N M :!: e ~ to
;;
0
"
z
;; 2
. ~ <
'0' < .
;; .t .., E
N ~ .
>
~ ;- 0
"
;; go ;'!
0;
. "E E
0' .
.t , >
;- 0
"
~ ~ E :
" < m
, " .
;; " 0 < E .
N ~ c, EO . "
. ~ , > E
. 0 ;- 0 ~
gi t\i
on: M
M
~
N
~ ;!
w
~] i ;1;
....] M
.,
o
N
M
m
o
~
:faG
158
,
i
, !
H
.j,
1st St. S. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (S.R. 29)
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
raG
160
~ - '\- . - , '\ t /'" \. ~ .'
200
200 200
200 200
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
u u u u u u u u u u u u
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~-~lIIIiIlIIIIIiiI-_1I
0.950 0.950 0.992
~~.i,___~ill-"'-I'_"'~
0.431 0.432 0.636
.~' 1lIIIlI""""- _ 1ll!l1l1'-~" ir"__~ L-_. I
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
.
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft)
-
Volume (vph) 501 500 327 283 628 114 262 412 390 54 204 83
1'i'B>_
Adj. Flow (vph) 545 543 355 308 683 124 285 448 424 59 222 90
. . 1IIIIlIII__
Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
~-
6
2684
2276
2084
2338
Perm
,
Permitted Phases
$0
4
4
8
8
2
2
16~ 1&0 1&0 1&0 1&0 1&0 1&0 1&0 1QO
,.
Minimum Initial (s)
nl_i_lIIIfl_'I'~ .
_!!i!i
Total Split (s)
'" ,~
~~ .0 .0 ~~ .0 .0 ~~ ~O ~O
,
Maximum Green (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 18.0
1III"_tlIIIIIlIIIIIllIRIIIIIII, ..
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~a1llll1!lrT"~-'---I__
Lead-Lag Optimize?
~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max
18.0 18.0
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
,~.-
Max Max Max Max
jl<; r
Flash DontWalk(s) 11.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.011.0
_e. ,~
,. '" ~J,,~
Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
_.",1BiI_1I"''''~'~__---"-=_iIIl!III]III_
v/c Ratio 1.54 0.29 0.35 0.72 0.36 0.14 1.06 0.72 0.59 0.93
ill." IIIEIfIIIlJlJ"_II-__IIIIBIL.~_ ill
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
""""""""'M'_' "' ,fijI1ilII!r__
~~~~" ^ _ ",~~~"'%li
WS F A A C A A FeD
WilsonMiller, Inc.
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
~ - "
raG
161
.
-
, '\
t
/'" \. ~
.'
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
,
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
#335 77 31 #206 98 19 #246 #261 106 #271
200 200 200 200 200
0
111IIlII1III
'..~--
'.",'"_.
"C!!I1K.~
~:OO""~
3: W. Main St. (SR 29) & N. 1st. St.
~:
.~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
raG
162
1st 51. 5 (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
+-'
(f)
+-'
(j)
......
("I")g~ :i ~114
ex> 7 10 ~ 628
~ ~83
W. Main S1. (SR 29) ""'> ,,/ E. Main S1. (SR 29)
r~
501~ 1i r
OO~ NNO
5~.- (0......0)
327~~ N~("I")
ex>
0:::
()
........
+-'
(f)
+-'
(j)
......
(f)
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"Be
163
~
-
"
.
-
,
'\
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
.'1"i "U~~IiIll~~~~1l"JIIBl"_
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
I. '.%'!i'l'!lilg.it~_lilIIIIII!IIIII.*i_.JlI ,.. ~ !IIi
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
1I11i_llIlIlIllDl1l9ll1lBRL ',0 '*4" . .. '" 'C2"f' ..~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~1l!IEliI\!~'." .' "".0 .,. .'
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
I.. l,,_.IIII'-~_~mll-milli __I
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.992
r 'lIIIf&IIlIlIIliIJiii~1~~.-i-.lMill.~"-~~'IiID~"71Nlml!ll.P1t II
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.449 0.418 0.629
--~ n'~II.~"~I_.--"1!!IlIIII-I~.JllIIB-.1!."""~~".
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~J_~DI.ill!IIIMIiI-._.r--~_d:'BIIIIIIl:II'f"'~ -
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1Ir---I~~__II~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
II lIllI.r~' '~II___r.~m.-~~'li1I ..'"
Volume (vph) 501 500 327 283 628 114 262 412 390 54 204 83
.. 0,', = . ..- ,., i!!!lI~lIIliitl!~J..-
545 543 355 308 683 124 285 448 424 59 222 90
...." '~JlS.."L...,.l~"ffJl~-~..
Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm. Perm
Lane Configurations
200
!..~.m Type
Prot
\, ';f"" , "'ii",~'j''''
4 8 8 2 2 6
......':J.."'.... ~il1~i~li!lfIlIlIl1l1iIlUIIII--
10~ 1~0 1~0 16~ 1~0 1~0 1~0 1~0 1~0 10~ 1QO
~lJif.ilU~nl_f~fl!\lf"'l~Jo"~IIIl-
W~d~gj '~~"'~h.~~,.",~
Total Split (s) 18.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 0.0
_iJlr . "liDi3!!~~~~<~
Maximum Green (s) 13.0 48.0 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
___,J1__._-__.1~~_r~lII-
All-Red Time (s) 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
._ """lIlIrjIUFlilIllit__l< ~." '.' 'sr ''ll~
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
,_~ ...,'> . .t. Xi".' 'roir1_~1!__4'GIZE'lili'lllllli!Jjll%!(it"*"",,*i.i&I,,,jj\-"-.'
~kj.... . ..,..... "!gfiil!lSfBj:~:~~_~ ~.i~~Ifii~~~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
- , ".'~ .~-'ij~-~~!l\_l~'ll
"C.""'=.. ,.,""""' twm'~~iMi;;MM!!'~~~~cA1@~~~"ar""~""",[ l!e
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
---'pl!!_iRiiS!_iii_~A'lti,'i!!!ro.ili:J0mJin0~_"'Ji',",Il"FjjjLL'rrirL"',fili(j'c'&"", i
mmIIllMl:'t,_~~~~.iilf;it'~~_";d&~~ffx"_,,,",___ ,__ _.* '"
Act Effct Green (s) 14.0 50.0 50.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0
-~~MIIIJII'l'I'~~._I!IIl__~~iIIlIliii_
v/c Ratio 1.02 0.28 0.34 1.04 0.54 0.19 1.03 0.68 0.56 0.89
-~~rJ'J'i~I'~~11k1llllllB~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1I.....<l<4iIl"=--.,.-m_~ili.-'"".lI11i'ili"_"!Ii!;_,..~~__'>i..li!iii.i'Wlti,~''''''''1'~IIl''Il. -i
___ )"1ii1'~liJBI!i.mil!L_rA_'__"~~""'!'!<l'*B..f'_"',jj''''''_ ___
LOS F B A F C A F CAD
Permitted Phases
..Ir w
Minimum Initial (s)
" . ---- t
Wilson Miller, Inc.
i"8C
1st St. S. (C.R. 846) at Main St. (S.R. 29)
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
164
~ - " . - , " t /'" \. ~ .'
90th %ile Term Code
Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Max MaxR MllXR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Max
11I.-' ,
10th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max
#272 109 37 #351 216
Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
35 #330 321 131 #361
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200
E .._
Sta,,:,ati~n G~P Reductn 0 ",. O"p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ICU Level of Service E
..
I Tj - TIrnlIT' i'l '1::iII
=,..' "="'0i'"
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90
~-I
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90
___lIIII_~.__IIll]
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~~l-Ti:II!If-'''lfl''
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
11-- ,
._-, u.--
lIII~i.lal' .
3: W. Main St. (SR 29) & N. 1st. St.
J;: J.
,
Wilson Miller, Inc.
,coO 8 C
,"""
.
165
<> .. .. :j ~ ... III '" <> ... .. '"
.. N .. ~ <> .. ~ .. '" ~
... ... Nl ~ '" '" ... .. ~ e
'"
<D
IE
<D
c
0
oi 0
"' N .. -, .. '" "' <D
'" ... <0: 0)1 N N '" '" <D
! ~ '"
e
j 0
j 0
c
I w 0
.9 <D
01 <<>1 ....1 <<>1 CO! c E
... "' ~ '" '" <D 0
::;: <> <q-i 0; ~ 0, (0; ~ N 0; ~ 0 '0
'" ('\Ii (01 '-OJ Wi 0 >
'"
i '-' .S
~ '" "'I ......1
'" '" ~r LO,
N '" I"'li
Ii ~I
en
-
....
III "' ~1
c:: M.
.j;j -,
:iE
- m
<> 0; 01 N
CO <> gf ~! ..
<0- '" '" u m
-i M"; <0; iE . ~
. ... -. N' .. 1" ~
Q) 0 >= 0
N 0
-'" "
Ii ,. ~
. Cl
~ E U u a: 0
0 . ~ 1"
" 'Q iE 0
en .. U1! 0); ..' > iL .. ~ e
'" ~i CO; >= "
ci ~, cil 1"
<> " -'" 0. .
.... <D '. '" ..
E ',.
III c ~ Cl U. .. a:
" E
<> g1 01 ~~ '" c U " 0 ~
- .. -, ';; << . 0 " 0-
., <> (0, I"'li Ni << .. "2' " >
... <<i exi' co; 61 u c 0.
'!ij 0- ,
N' ("')1 r<l ~ '"
>= 0 c e <D
U 0 I
c 0 N E
lj . " e .. ~ 0
.. a, '" .. :g
!!!. u ~ ci ..
I- iE u " 0-
U) U) .. .. '" ~ '"
" " >= OJ .. u
<> ~i 01 ~ ~ ..
0; l- I- l- e
~ en.; (0; :J :J " Cl e ~
.~ l,t); ~1 Oil U) U) 15 '" ~ ~ ~
(0); '"""1 (7); u. u. I- 0-
- ~ c ~ ~ ~ to:
"
..
15
~j -; iril z
~ en; Cf),
'" .....; (")1 (I),
I
u w
.. .~ l:
'" B 0
<> <i: E
N 5 ..
oS >
l- e
~ :;;
0
u g' l:
..
"- C E
0 5 .
<i: >
l- e
:;;
" ~ EO
" 5 '" c w
.
'" I 0 c E 0
;; ~ 0, ~ .. "
N m ~ > E
.. u .= e ~
0- m :;;
" W
~
"Be
166
1st 51. 5 (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
-'
(f)
-
en
......
...... CXl Z "--
...... (0 en 159
...... 7 I--- ~ 893
~ f"340
W. Main St. (SR 29) "-.,~/ E. Main St. (SR 29)
/~
604~ '1i r
659-7 ......01---
396~(O ~~~
"'"
CXl
0::
()
----
-
(f)
-'
en
......
(f)
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
167
~
-
"
.
-
,
'\
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
~l~~J~lI"~"~IRW
Storage Length (ft) 200 206 200 200' 200 .. 200 200 200
..,,,.~~. . .....
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
'-T ""-~:.~ ^ . ,:",Cjl' n ,.~~CG ." "". , i 0*' _ *....
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
& ~'F["'.iIIlllrilD~Bg:~U~~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.991
. .....7.. .....iflil~l-~lilii!fj}l!~.IIl11SIlf!.1\
Fit Permitted 0.222 0.328 0.348 0.476
~);.iJ-~4ill'i:::r'"-""-"""-~}_D_~-""='Ii_"~-
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
!IIulll--~.IIl1IP.IlI-~~'IIfIIl--'~~~JlIUIL'
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
__"JlI~ ....;. ""lIg,~ 1'1
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
_..III_._.w,'
Volume (vph) 604 659 396 340 893 159 311 470 427 79 268 111
~~~-~-~~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 657 716 430 370 971 173 338 511 464 86 291 12!.
Turn Type Perm
ili'-Ir-.dfllt?,~
l1iiL~~mi,Jb"lllill
Permitted Phases 4
._., r'"
Perm Perm
Perm
" f",
Perm
" ,.-
8
2
Perm Perm
'.;'l_~_.
2 6
..._,.....~..~. "
..''''''. . ,
w' . .
*""illG::m. )": . .
16.0 10.0 10.0
';'=('
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0
.. ....~,...
16.0
.,
Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 33.0 33.0
.11I"'_._ "6 '~'. . '''' 'J_"-"iir"'1iiif"'fiiGl'il<:6Jli_!l!0l1JWA"llif!i!"l'Ill<"iIl"!lt..
_...~~~.Sl.lWl.~,~:J~I;~iY0l~,.~Jt~~j~~
Maximum Green (s) 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 27.0 27.0
. .'\lIl1IIlJ1...._
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~_"illlIl1l)Ullm~..liII_IIIllIlltilIfl'-I.lIlr. .m
Lead'Lag Optimize?
~- ~.Iii~lD' ..,
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max
. ~
33.0
'"iW:'~-~'
27.0
33.0 33.0 0.0
, '.N"'-,"......,.jj ..,"" [
".1
27.0 27.0
;';'2.,,-, .
2.0
.
2.0 2.0
"',,, '
,
",
Max
Max Max
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
___.~.. . ;.. ..., s"", '_1l!"-1iI~.
Act Effct Green (s) 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0
~lIl..JIiIIlI:'1lllll!;~_~-I..' .' ',' ,. '.TI'
v/c Ratio 2.95 0.38 0.42 1.13 0.51 0.19 1.44 0.76 0.67 1.53
~1f:;j!i1l.~.~--,iIJliil"'____-=~__
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_llr_~>jV'roo~~.itli1ll'J!i~_, -,,"-"'--c.r,~JfLjjBitR..T"y.+lIliIIIiIImIII
_ --'.ll1r.,.+"'~_________~I_~iIj_~ ..
LOS F 8 A F 8 A F C 8 F
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
168
~
-
"
.
-
,
'\
/'"
\.
.'
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
-'\
70th %lIe Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %lIe Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
-
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #681 138 217 #537
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200
- ..-
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
""''trJ .. ~
0 0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 121.4%
^ ^ .. ... ... .... ~i
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 80
50th %ile Actuat;d Cycle: 80
10th %lIe Actuated Cycle, 80
,
. ....He."'. '. ''''i
m ~..-.'!r"~- -.
,.. -r-';;~ "" ~~;b)j' '"
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
- - -. --'--, "~IIIIIIIlIIIII.lUIi..!iIllIIIII!
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
It
3: W. Main St. (SR 29) & N. 1st. St.
;r.~
~ ~0S
~
WllsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29)
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
~ - '"
170
.
-
, "' t /'" \. ~ .'
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
_-' 1JPj~1~'''-1111111''"'
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
200 200 200 200
_II~-
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lit 1IIli~~II.IllBl
0.991
j.I~1l
0.609
~~~11-~ u
Yes Yes
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95
il I 111IIiI1l___ I
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950
~__~~-_l'-,""J_'-'''I~I
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.388
I __'.1111-11 ~I~iIlBl[
Right Turn o~ Red Yes Yes
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2338
604 659 396 340 893 159 311 470 427 79 268 111
~ ~
Adj. Flow (vph) 657 716 430 370 971 173 338 511 464
- ~.DIIIIIIIiI_
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm
___f!1hi,i~__I~.""'"IIIIIi!l'r."Ji4""',~", ."
~~'imf~_,%r~"9ftrl~~;;:'WJ0.. ""_.. .
Permitted Phases 4 8
__'T;il_!ib4.~_~,I","
__IUllili!I!""'iRiiS!_U_
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 16.0 16.0
_mlftt1l._"""Vi,ldlllL:n_iSl'" .
~~~I!~?iU~2flliv~i?A1W~_ . ' ' .
Total Split (s) 20.0 31.0 31.0 16.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 0.0
__ll_lllIIl~.ll.IIII._"".lIIf1111.
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 25.0 25.0 12.0 21.0 21.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0
____I. ,
All-Red Time (s) 0.5 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~iltfBlIlIl"'~..1lfll..I8l1l1111Im~!IIII_1II!1:
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
IIDil~ m__iIIDil:_ .",
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max Max
~_~""_jll.1l1lll11!lllfli1l1llllll~___..JIIIlI~__
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
pBIllllIIIII.__III1___IJI_-"'M&lri'.--__ll_
Act Effct Green (s) 16.0 27.1 27.1 11.9 23.0 23.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0
.Rll_~_~'_if"~..I"'"
v/c Ratio 1.08 0.67 0.59 0.82 1.07 0.33 1.08 0.63 0.50 1.02
~1if_rA_~I.'lIl11l.IIII:Jf~i,.,.IIIIII'lIIIIlIl!illllmW'__
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. ~llIll11l11ii__~~._iIlIl1lII
F CAD F A F CAE
86
291
121
Perm Perm
-
2 2 6
"~"fi__III1f_
16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
LOS
WilsonMiller, Inc.
,t~,:. Be
~,
1st 51. 5. (C.R. 846) at Main 51. (5.R. 29) 171
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
~ - " . - , '\ t /'" \. ~ .'
90th %i1e Term Code
Max Max Max
MaxR
~0
Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
II -1IIIIIl~' ~~!! -1II~.
30th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
II'IB~ IllIIiII ~~ ,. l'i11Jlill....1lIIlI"--'W.~_IIIl- ,_ "Ill
10th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Hold Gap Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
...1 --r-l1~ ..
Queue Length 95th (ft) #324 250 120 #175 #448 53 #382 328 71 #490
I iii I ,-,11111]_ __~_JI_(I1_fJ;111l111L_. JmI
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200
~JiI1III~kjID
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~...
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 90
"'....01'
( h'''':''
"0_~__
,,,,",00",
gill_l!1rlllill_lflll_;fJlllliliilllf~~JmI[111ll1ililllLl2l.t'llllllil'11
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.08
'~i9."~1ilHl:il~!!miiIiW~~JI,1ilQt"iirIilDiY-!lili._!~I-"~'
wfntli _. 900....." ,.Rmhm,"0x,~~rt',tg;!_~""" ... Gi
Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.2% ICU Level of Service G
-'--~I_""'jk"",g"'"ii4,,'c'AC1ii_'''';'i!Y''''''''''''lli+'''''''"'fI""""g""M"-"l1ilJ!][III
. '... n.jJJj}~~.*1~mili;'lg~_.B~!~8k[5i;jb~m~:'~~~/i@!Il~1ftIir~~s1 S;
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90
- ,'W'
""'i",,"~ili""~iW""""'"!I0l&'''':,1i''''iiril1ijY''iilWj!'''Ii'''''..'ctrilJ'....,"1i-'._""iII_l
~g:fu~~iHllP&~G#~~]~~J~_k@t~'0thfug. ~ ", .:,..~4j2?"~~~\U~~4~~~. ~"' . "7
50th %i1e Actuated Cy~le: 90
., " ~""~~~[_E~f_~[i;kUit~91.JIIIII!~t1\1J.'1!f<<~~.~
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 90
~'11l.>~~ffiklll&_ir;<<<;I"liil'l0J"L"rIlI'''lBjF'''''fii'''''j}lbOi!M!'''''''''a""iilillllltllC_
. .. '. ~_l~~",,, ~.'. '.. !l!I~f02j_~~1{rIIM;~:~f\11f~lfm~L;114.jjj - ... "'.~.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
, C" '" .....'.,..';1,"''''';.".'''''''''",. '. '"il'L'd&ir' . ,'~""g'~'i~_""""_"--1lI
""". ",^':"".,mY~;%,w~!r:lllt?ijmf;i&l~yJ.~~4r~~~1f. .' "~4:
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
I~~
t,.. ..s
3: W. Main St. (SR 29) & N. 1st. St.
~: ~.
~
;n,;""
WilsonMiller. Inc.
'ae
Main 51. (S.R. 29) at Ninth St.
172
l/I"
p Be
173
'"
.
0 ~ ~ ~j E
.; N .; ,
~ ~ ~ ~, 8
.
~
.
E
.
E
~ ~ ~j .
~ ~ >
N N 0
'" M ;! E
~
c
. ~
"
t .
"
'" ~ 0 M ~ ....j ~
~ N '" ~ ~
M " .,; ;i ., N .; M N oil .; .
M N ~ N 10; " "
. . c
~ ~ 0
~ u
0 '. 'iij
0 >
~ . "
c ~
<!; ~ ;0 ~~ . .Q '.
.,; ~ E ~ u
U) M ~ wi ~ .
.J: 0 E "
:> ~ , B
- 8
l: g> \;
z .~ ~ g
'5 00
c c
- ~ 0 . 0.
'" N ~ '" 0 9;1 0 ~ . ~
N 0> ~ ~ ~ . "
~ N N ~ N 0 :e ;;; h
c;;- oo c ~ " ~
N " => .Q .
x " ~
0:: ~ ~
~ '" c
~ ~
.,; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 qj 0
U) ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., o~ .,
l:
'i
::;;
c
0
.
.
.
t ~
~
~ .
.
i 0.
N ~ N: 0> ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ !\Ii f
~ 0 :e ;1;1 ;;; 0
N Nj ~ N ~
..
,
c
c
~
.
~
..
'"
"
.
..
Q
'aG
174
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
z
-
(f)
.!:
-
c:
oomN Z ~51
:dtN ~542
~1S
Main St. (SR 29) "" / Main St. (SR 29)
/ ~
1 S--...? 1r
506-7
'<tNOO
160'00 ......NN
N......
....;
(f)
.!:
-
c:
Z
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
"Be
175
~
-
"
.
-
,
'\
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
4: ~
,-
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
;, -", . -"..-,... .. ... r"",-, -, -,-,. .', ". '. '4. .. ,..- __ _ ~,
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
---, ~-"""\~<IIIC_..~_"
. ~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.969 0.990
rr-~'lpw-1!111~1."'--1IIIi""'iIl'ff-I__~~sl;-i!lIII.I..~,
Fit Permitted 0.356 0.308 0.736 0.898
III '-~-~_--~~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~~,....~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 !.!JO 1.00
2338
Volume (vph) 15 506 160 15 542 51 214 122 28 22 89 28
,~..
2.0
Lead-Lag Optimize?
~-"'__''1.__Il\!II!iI'~
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max Max Max
--; 0 _ , ._
. \ilV'
19.0
11.0
_~W
11.0 11.0 11.0
19.0 19.0
~l'IIiIII_
0.07 0.46 0.63 0.04 0.17 0.04
_.'i "gmk&'""H....jBM-~iIf~~_____dL_'"'''4_
~J~~!mi!~;~lZt"ka~~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
jF~~~ll!1ll-1'I''''0L_' u, ~'" """"'. . ., '" Hi" 'P' ~1"'-1l
!l!l?m!'simM!M~ - .Jlli51&mEht~J <. ":tL'\frl~",_
WS A A A 8 B A A A
Act Effct Green (s) 18.0
~~i~.:
v/c Ratio 0.06
18.0
18.0
0.51
---"j) i'--
- .f'<'
WilsonMiller, Inc.
"'Be
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
176
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Approach LOS A B B A
Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
11 94 11 92 #142 10 42
c
200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0
....
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IDI.
~mn
Cycle Length: 45
11111- 11I1iIII--lrr.~,~-~_r J1111
Natural Cycle: 45
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
i U:-'"",,ij ~_w"lll"-~-Il_111 _'11_
-, Y..____________. iIlII" wM
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45
.
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 45
III !iIll
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 45
11IIIII ~~~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
r~
i.... OS
3: Main Sl. (SR 29) & Ninth Sl. N.
= ~:
::1
Wilson Miller, Inc.
r'Be
177
~ M ~ P'I: m :!! Dr ~ D co! ~
::? M ... D' .. CJt; 0 .. -,
....1 CDj .. :H
!
0 .. ~ co! M' 0 .. ~J ;'\
M ~; M
....1
~ '" 0 ~I '" ~ ~I ~ .. ('l~ M
~ N M .. ::: N ~! 0
"
! D
.
<
g
"
0 8'
.;: .
.. . .
'" C\.I; ~1 ~! ii E
c:: ~ ..' < ,
GI M Nj "
W >
U 9 <
Ul < ~
.. . 1>
'i: .8 e
.. u ~
:a; M oi ~l L('Jl
~ lrij ~~
CD 0
..; ~
lJ) .t:
- 0 01 01 0;
.t: ~ ~ OJ 0; 0; i!
- NJ '<ti <OJ .
c:: ,.: 0' 0' . "
Z ~ .....j N' ,.. ,
~ ~ 0
- 0 . U
.
.. N . c . 1);
c;;- E g 0 0: n ~
, " 8. 5
N en: enl al! ~ e . 0 .
:; 0. ,.. U 1);
Ii <:0; CD; co; " "
oi 0; 0; . ~ . <
. ;; .. '" " ~
!!!.. E ~ . 0:
< .. c ~
m E .
< g u ,
..; 0 0: 0; ~I ~ <{ 0 " 0.
;; N; Ni . 'e " >
lJ) en; <{); 0 "
.,; <6' ~ < 0. ,
~j ("): 0 ~ '"
c:: N' N . 0
,.. j , < I .
'C; < , ~ !Ii
.. " 0 g: ~
:a; . ~ . "
E 0 " .
,.. <'? ~ 0 " 0. >
'" '" " ~ i -fi
, '"
gi , oi " " ,.. 3: ,.. .
0 ,.. ,.. 0
Ii: 0 r; il => => ~ c 0 "-
~':! ~ gi '" '" '" ~ . ~
~ ~ ,.. 0. ,.. <{
- " 6: ~ ;0 ;0 E
, .
.
f8! E
z
~1
!
!
!o
,j
'ac
178
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
z
.,.j
(f)
.c:
-
c:
('I) z ~117
0)(0 Ii)
Jl~ ~1016
~8
Main S1. (SR 29) "'> ,/ Main S1. (SR 29)
I ~
16--...? 1r
696-7 ......Ii)('I)
205' u:i Ii) ('1)('1)
N......
-
(f)
.c:
-
c:
Z
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
"Be
179
~
-
"
.
-
, '"
t
I'"
\.
~
.'
Lane Configurations
..........'"'''"' .'
, ,
- . ..
Storage Length (ft) 200
t1o-
"""$
0:.....iiF''f....
tt. .t
'"~l\"
. . ... , ,~~..,.,,,~
200 200 200
S:!; . ~ .,"" ..,;'''''"
.t
,rr
200 200
200
200
4.0 4.0 4.0
,
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0
........
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95
'If,' "'.."
, .....-~.'"v,.,
4.0 4.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.969 0.984
~lllt___Iil1~~'..!iHlllill'l......~~
Fit Permitted 0.222 0.222 0.644 0.749
IIlI1ll I_-~I-I~-~':l
Right Turn on Red. Yes Yes Yes Yes
. ~". ; """:''''''
o 0 0 0 0 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-~1I1 lIIlillllllllllFilllll_~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2064 2338
~~~~~
\folume (vph) 16 696" 2p5 28 101~ 117 251 135 33 75 163 49
Adj. Flow (vph) 17 757 223 30 1104 127 273 147 36 82 177 53
If--~__' .........~
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
iiw;%. .
""Pi' - "0 ,'t. ''YIHtCI.;~'.'
4 8
2
6
6
Permitted Phases
"",,,-"';M ..~. .."". ':'
~,~,,-_._ 'CO"
16.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
Minimum Initial (s)
1IIfIIIIIiIEI' .
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
~~II~~_.--....
Maximum Gre"n (s) c ~16.0 .16.0' " 16:0' 16.0 '17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.017.0
IJ-.~~~_Ij.iir"'--'~~
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
1m ., w"i' :"~ki~\':';='-.. '" . ~.. 'Ai
Lead-Lag Optimize?
!Ii~_'
Recall Mode None None
_.IiI_~:"
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0' 11.0 11.0
-'<I1ill'U'BliltRtArilf_Ii_bUilil!-"v
~~..",..A!!;~... .."'~~ , !O
Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
.- n_?l&lI1Iilfutl.!lliillll".iil!illl~l,l~_~ilIRIIIIIlIrl'___
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.69 0.18 0.87 0.83 0.05 0.44 0.08
~~-jj~~~'._~"".~~tlilJB
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
~_lIllJt.iI~lIliiililli'liWDIIL.lll_"~"
LOS B B B C
16.0
16.0
None None
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
C
A
B
A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
"ae
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
180
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Approach LOS
B
C
C
B
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~~
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Max Max
MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code
MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
~~
Starvation Cap ~eductn 0 0 0 0 0 ,00 0
"""Il-Ii'III1II~-
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D
~
90th %ile Actu~ted Cycle: 45
-_~I_IiJIiI~
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 45
III' I.~' ~-j- _iIIv'~"'-!III~ ~-""~Ir "".].lUi~'I'_
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45
~-,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
r~~~ '"~..
.~~.6
3: Main Sl. (SR 29) & Ninth Sl. N.
~ ~:
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
181
'" .. ... .. ;z .. ... N .. ~ N
'" on .. ~ ~ .. .., on ;!
~ N ... N
.....j
~
..
~
;! a> ...; lOi M! '" 0 .....j ... (!)
OJ '<!"i .....1 01 ... .., 0'; '" .
NI ~, :c
.
c
g
.
.
'"
e
OJ 0 ~j ("')1 ... ~ ml a> '" IOj a> ,
.
'" '" gl <0 a> OJ ~i '" c
W .
" .
c E
. ,
. '0
0 >
~
tJ .5
'" ~! oj
'" 0:
'" Mj a>'
..:
I/J
..c::
.. ;;; Il)f
l: oq-!
Z <0 ('\I;
N:
.. ;;
..
~ ~
"
en 0 of "
N 0 ~j ;;
oi "'- u
... ~n IE " c
e c '0
ui .... , "
'" 0
~ tJ
..: 'm .
. 0
I/J .
E " 0 '" .
, . 0; 'E
l: mj ~l 0); ~ B IE ,
.Ii '" Q: e "- 0
"! 0::)1 ~j .... tJ
::!! or 61 OJ 'E "' '" 0. .
. .. 'm <n .
E ~ . '"
c .. 0 ~ E 0;
0 o. ~~ 8t 0> c U tJ ,
OJ 0>, ~ <( . 0 '0 <L
0 qi O,j vi . B '" >
<D en: ~, ~j 0 c Q: 5 0.
N: IE 0 <n
. N . u 0
'" u , c r .
c , OJ E
.. . " e 0> ~ ,
.. 0> 0 . ~
~ !!? 0 ~ ci .
IE 0 " a.
, ! "' "' . '" ~ ~
, e " . u
I oj o! '" '" .... ~ ,. .
0 0; oj .... .... .... ~
CD 1""':' -;1 ::> ::> .. 0 0 "-
~ !::Ii ~I "' "' <5 "' :l ~ "-
'" ~ ~ .... <L <(
! ~ ~ e 'i: € ~ to:
;,;
.
<5
Cl)i Z
CJll
Nj
u ~
0 OI "
<0 'a e .
0 Ii:. .~ "
"
N .s 5 >
.... 0
~ :;
~
u OI "
" 0
,2- '~ E
0 5 .
Ii:. >
.... 0
:;
~ u " E
c
~ OI m
<0 0 " ,E .
~ J: - c E .8
0 '" OI- . m
N m ~ , > E
. ~.... 0
<L :; ~
III W
"
" c U "-
,
<0 0 . ~
J: '" 0
0 '" c. ,
N m '" ,
. 0 0.-
a. m ",g
III
~
~
~ @
~,J
2H
~.
, Be
182
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
z
-
(f)
..c:
-
c:
00 z ~142
'<t......r--
,tm ~1236
~59
Main S1. (SR 29) "> / Main S1. (SR 29)
I ~
18--...? 1r
797-7 ('I) co 00
232' u:i r--'<tli)
N......
-
(f)
..c:
-
c:
Z
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
rac
183
~
-
"
.
-
,
....
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Lane Configurations, , . 'i off> 11 oft> 4' 7' ,4' r
'~~--"!II..tJiL~~Blll
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:'_~Ir~__
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~lB~~. .' ,.
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
---~~~'IIIII~1l
Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
..~ IIr -I JIlIlIiIlIJf.lrill!~1I 1lIIIII_~"- Il'.filll__
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.968 0.985
mm ~~Iili- "~~__~I '~".'q.._~~
Fit Permitted 0.160 0.160 0.529 0.660
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~~1iIII__~~~__iliii_
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
BIi -11~r--.1III~1I1I11TII
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
-~'~.~~i~~
Volume (vph) 18 797 232 59 1236 142 273 146 58 97 218 64
lio~r~~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 20 866 252 64 1343 154 297 159 63 105 237 70
.., ~<lj---,-' .",. .
fu~0ilg1~'.IJ_4~~
Perm Perm
Turn Typ." . '
Perm
.
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
~~~__r~_
Minimum Initial (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
., '" "::!i9!il\l1!!lRI I". .
Total Split(s) 29.0 29.0 0.0 29.0 29.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0
fili--"-" ml'll'~,' ..aIIi___-._
Maximum Green (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
~ JIIIIlII'--I'.Jlilil1lil!l., .. .~, j, '
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~~
Lead-Lag Optimize?
~_..
Recall Mode None None
Perm Perm
..
Perm
"" i(:'~U iX";
,;t-' ~u
None None
, '~'
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Flash Dont Walk (sL,
11.0 11.0 11.0
11.0 11.0 11.0
'4fH''''', '; ""71': '* *""0%&" ,,*. :1%"""
":" .'tI"!',..,.,. "'.~ . ''''\ ."'
11.0 11.0
fiill"
11.0
if:
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
Main 51. (5.R. 29) at Ninth 51.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
184
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~ill~----~__lm
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
MaxR MaxR MaxR
-.-rr...'- ....I
MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Ill'. 1111II IIIII.U~I'- -.---__...:IIIIIIIIllIlIt. .AI II"
30th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
11_ ~. "'i1lll1l-Il'IIf.lIJ.~II__"IfJkl!lW~I~~; u'~-~II
10th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
-- .l,I:I---~~'--.--.1 tl JllltllU
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 232 #68 #434 #337 17 169 30
1,,- ~Irll"--"__" Ii. ,"E-bl' _....-' --'''If"-' -1
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
~1If-~f'"""lr--"__
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1!iI-1.~~I_
Storage Cap Red uctn 0 0
c;ycle Length: 60 .
i'Jatural Cycle:.60" , ,..
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03
Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.7% ICU Level of Service F
_~II_H_._~Il!IIIIIlIIIIIIII- --" I!lI!!
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
..i' -~.i___~1Il ~1Ill11 '-1_
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
~1IIIlIiiIIIIIIl-lloo-ml.lIl1_:lIII. Willi! ._
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
plllll__-_m__~T1I!~il --._
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
~:
3: Main Sl. (SR 29) & Ninth Sl. N.
3:
j
WilsonMilier, Inc.
rBe
186
-g
~ ., ., E
,
ci '" ci 8
~ ., ~ ~
.
~
.
E
.
E
m m .
~ m ~
N ~ <0 m
~ ~ ., M E
~
c
. 'E
. a
~ .
~
<0 e ~
"' N m M 0 ~ ~ <0 ., <0 .
$ ,.: ci N ci ~ ~
<0 '" ,.: on ,.: .
<0 N M ., ~ ., ~ ~
. . c
E ~ 0
;: . 0
'0 E
..: " ~ ~
.
C E ,~ '"
~ M M ~ . '0
ell ~ M M ~ E ~ ~
ell ~ ~ N ~ .
OJ 0 E €
" . , B
-" ~ c 0
0 0 \i
0 c 0
'E E
E ~ c ~
, :; c ..
.E .. .
M <0 <0 0 . " ~ . Q
<0 ~ <0 M m M ;: m ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
- <0 N ~ <0 M <0 m 1I '0
'0 E
IV ~ E
c;;- o
N .
~
<< ~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
...
III
~ . =
- " . .
'" . . .
- ~ >- >- >-
c c . .
, , . . c
.
0 0 . m 0
" u m .
B .
.
~ ~
~
~ .
.
i ..
M m ~ <0 0 .
<0 ;: m ~ ~ 0
..
,
c
c
<(
0
"
B
.
"
,
..
.
0
i
l
I
!-
,j
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
'aG
188
~
-
"
.
-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Storage Length (ft)
200
200 200
200 200
200 200
200
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
l!tl ~l_'~' -~~~Jlilli!li!.l1i""'.-
Fit Protected 0.977 0.993 0.950 0.950
.. -- ,'_... DJIIlII'__"--._"*'~'~llr Ii'
Fit Permitted 0.802 0.952 0.229 0.205
_ '1IlIIBi ",1:__~I_l!I_'--"-----
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
_Ii _---1IIIlr"""'--_liIIllIIIrl.'..i-;";.I"'4W~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
'"," ,., . _1I~[IiIIIIIII1I_ i' ~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 3058 2952
11II i '-I '__I__lIl11_1I11111....
Volume (vph) 63 71 99 19 126 100 67 683 25 58 636 39
__~..illlll--"~~lIl1i11Il1l11111.If:.~~.-] ri5" '-" -- -
Adj. Flow (vph) 68 77 108 21 137 109 73 742 27 63 691 42
_ J,'IllIl1IIIIllI__b_WIJiII1- '"'""
Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
" ,~_._Jn'.~.;lmiiIiIIII.'1IiIII'.''-_.
8 8 2 6
*lIl1_~.lIJ-
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
_~' "-~'r'.i.llII! '[
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0
1Il~""'__lII__r!!r__lr~lIlIllUil
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16,0 16.0 16.0 16.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0
, " ',liIiIlIl1llIIIlIIIiIlfillllllllilllllr_ mn..!t i l
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
';, ,~;j:~ll_!llill_JII!iIll1Jl___
. -, . ""~II-
None None Max Max Max Max
Turn Type
Perm
4
4
Permitted Phases
All-Red Time (s)
,
Lead-Lag Optimize? .
Recall Mode
Flash Dont Walk (s)
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
!&"',
""dL,
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
"i_~"r!l"~..a.
14.1 14.1 40.2 40.2 40.2 40.2
Act Effct Green (s)
14.1
14.1
,,~,
v/c Ratio
-'
~.- ,
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0
IlIIB!!Iu~~1IIiIl
LOS CAB
.
0.43
0.24
0.39
0.24
0.0
1
A
0.25 0.60 0.24 0.58
'~l.lI'i--.IIIIIIIIIIE IllI
~O ~O ~O ~O
, ; 111m'.II1IIiIlI1li
A A A A
'''','''
WilsonMiller, Inc.
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
r;ac
189
~
-
"
.
-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.;
B B A A
Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR
Min Min MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
Dwell Dwell Dwell
90th %ile Term Code
70th %ile Term Code
Queue Length 95th (ft) 82 29 86 30 36 301 33 275
~~
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.
."',.' .- , . " ',,,,.~.~ '
~t
i"'~;Z''"~ ,
':i,!t"'"
.'S!j""...'~~~~as;~
.. '"aitl.,.; ;."1'1f' n"H';~ ,
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'Be
190
0 '" co1 ;:::1 ;;: '" ..,.; ~ '" 10;
m N '" 1'-; ~ N ~i M
'" CD;
0
.;: M, ~i C\.I;
.. :;l ....., N;
" ~ 1'-; N' Ml
II>
u
Ul
..
.;:
.. tl)i
::;; '" "" ~i
;l; (0: 00;
..: II> ~ ~, lOj
C >
II> <I:
II> ~ 0 81 0, 0:
.. - 0 0' 0'
-" ~ '" ~, ("); ...... 0
0 't ~i 10; 1O~ .. ~
E - '" 5
- ~ 0
.E 0 '. 0 i5
N . 0 . .
.
- E n 0 '" 2 ~
.. , . 8- c ,
m 0;'; ~I ~l .. ~ E ,
m > . 0 .
'" ~1 ~ ~ 0
N ci c " ~ ... . 00
. .~ '. oo . ~
ci E . '"
c .. 0 ~ E .
!!t 0 :Ei gl ~j m c ~ 0 ,
N ~ <( 0 .. ~
m ("')1 0), '<1"1 . '0 " >
.s 01 .0' cO; 0 c a: ...
..; Nj .. 0 5 oo
Ul N . U 0
'" n , c I .
c , ~ ~
~ ;; . :> e m ~
- .. ~ 0 . ..
'" 0 !'!- 0 ci .
~ " 0 " ~ >
- oo oo . . ~ ~ 15
I " " '" '" . "
oj ~ ~ ~ ~ " e
1'-1 => => .. 0 0 ~
~1 oo oo '0 oo ~ . ~
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ M :;: " " E
;;
~
0
Z
M
N
'"
'" co; Mi ;;:
N CICI; ....;
"'.
..
..
r--i Co on
r--' ~ N
mj ~
-'
M IOj Ni (')! ~ (")1 M
:? Nl :!l N
!
i
h
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
192
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total Lost Time (s)
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ -Il~_r-~- .,- ''Ii '-___..__
Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
IIiI - IE _ Ij/If'm~[IIlLJ - illl ~..----_ "'--r-e
Fit Protected 0.977 0.994 0.950 0.950
laI' "'IJIlIIMI-nn;~~-'~~_-=-_
Fit Permitted 0.780 0.949 0.118 0.118
1m -- --.-""-,m'u:!IlE ._~ '--""nTl~~!ll!111
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
I!iIt ---~""'T'71iV___
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-, -JII~"~IIl!l_~_
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 3058 2952
~" ,,~ ~l
66
77 120
25 169 154
83 823 25 86 813
41
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph) 72 84 130 27 184 167 90 895 27 93 884 45
11II1II11..IIllIIIII&__t_ -'lIIlIiIIlIliII
Turn Type . Perm" , Perm Perm' Perm Perm Perm
_____fuli__'.'" I Zi'm!lilrtl>iliiiiRii_v,.
_1IIF_1ll_~!tl!lSl!!!lEll!ifIIr_'_l" .,; _r_i!!!
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6
, '" "'I_~"_III'.I&_~'-'__IIIIIrIIf!R_____-l.""iliE,""" "
"' ,___ ~~~1i1iti1!~_~~~
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
_.__!l"'IIIIfiIIIIIIli_l1li~~''IIUl_._
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0
_,_ ,'*'~ '_ ""lli[ ~l-.'r---_' ','" . ''''*'" '" --, ..-__
~~iilJBl_~5jdL ,.. " . "'!m~
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0
~!!II-__fl!IliIiIIIIlIllliB__I;'mI_(_
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
_III 1~___IT._lIIIrr.~!IIiIIlIlilI._.l_iII _._
Lead-Lag Optimize?
, ..d_I'1UIII!'Tfllr~~'-"fv_I_~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max Max
~._.lIIIIIlml~-'i--"ili ' 'iilTIrnm_1II
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
li~-' l!,!!~-'-.~.' 111"'N'lI'i' 'T .-11I"" Iili
Act Effct Green (s) 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
__~.I.[[II_IIl1I1IfI'.~
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.26 0.48 0.34 0.67 0.81 0.69 0.82
._B~'._!l_~"__m
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_ ", .'__I~IIlI~_I,__
LOS ^"^ q~~ ~'C"~'^,,,," A' """,,, C' - A i5 B ' ''''0' -'8' '
Wilson Miller, Inc.
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
r r
8 \.1'
193
~
-
"
.
-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
l
.'
,M
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Min Min Min Min Min Min MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Hold Min Min Min Dwell Dwell Dwell Dwell
32 111 45 #99 #510 #102
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~' '-" "IW
't"'''''
'"
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.6% ICU Level of Service E
.. _EN_.'__illiIllIlI:lIf;1!__''IiIi!IIIIl~
"
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 60
.' '''1:11III
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 55.8
~~'jjf!Ji_'::':'~II~""ij.~~2ill:r&""'Ifi!4#::ll'*X2t1.El1!ll!!II"I__
. :- ";-",'~d~- ;i&I, :"~"0M--- --~~~f.j$
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 59
"', ""',1"-' I
_"'s;-''''''_+t'I_ki*il.i1t...iffi''...4G_:'iiFlfN__. .'
J gmbJ~~~.:it"'~j _ _r~F~*mEf&f~~~lfijf~
Queue shown is maximum after two 'cycles.
,"......w1~f'..'4ri,_Ed:(?_'ilIli~.2'_ '.
-'<--j-_i~!l\~~~OOI~
~
PC"......'
,'m- "
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'ae
194
;;; M ('1'); <oj N lOl a
"' 0; N "'
~ Nl
"' '" '" 0>; '" N <<;i '" "' o! N
N '" "', '" .... '" "" ~
.... ~~ Nl
0
.;:
III
C
Gl M; 1'-: ~I
..: CJ ;;; (0; <0;
C III <<Ij C\lj
III !
Gl .;:
Gl III
OJ ::E
~
0 Gl co; '<t; ,....;
E > ;; 1.0; ("); ('\I;
< "'. 00_1 LOj 1'-,
E ~1 Ii
.t: ~
- 0
- ~ E
III a 8l 8~ 81 s
~ a 0 ..
C> CD '" ('\I: 0): 0): " . in
.... ... ,..: cii Ll"ii r-:j e c
Q ('Ii .... " ~
Ii b 0 0;
.... .. ()
en ~ 0 ~
- E 'Ii 0 a:: .
" 1l c
..: :g 'e- " "
III '" 0:': '" '" m 0
a. '" ()
'" co; '" '" C
.t: 0 oj 0 0 0;- b 1i .
~ .. 00 m
- E '.
It) c ~ 0 u. . a::
... ~ .. 'Ii () E "
a ~! a a 1.ji c "
a a '" 0 '0 a.
;;; F'-; "' '" 0 ~ "e '" > 1i
,,; C\i; .; .; " c a. 5
0 00
NI e N . u 0
" c I ~
.... u c " N E
.. . " e m ~ "
.. 0 m
'0 ~ ci . :g
~ 0 ~
.... " 0 " a.
"' 00 m m '" ~ ~
'" '" '" '" m 0
~ ;: .
,0 .... .... .... e
'0 ::> ::> ~ 0 l 0
j'- "' 00 00 ::; 0
N U. U. .... a. '"
- 5 Ei: ~ € e E:
;,;
.
'0
z
1:> w
" '" c
'" "e- o "
~ .~ E
0 a.
N "
,s ,:: >
;: 0
::E
"
1:> g' C
.
.2- E E
0 0
Ii. " >
.... 0
'"
, u E
0 c
';'. 0 " '" 0 w
I e .E E 2
g ~ ~
Nl '" N ....
U); .. .... ..
O)!
co It) It) N
M M CO') C"')
~ N N
!
"'
3~
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
rae
196
~
-
"').
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
200 200
", 1 ~'"
200
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
..__ 111I1111111~_III..~i.'
Fit Protected 0.978 0.994 0.950 0.950
_li_ ..-\~~-"~-~~_JIIlIIIIIIl__
Fit Permitted 0.490 0.938 0.082 0.119
.. Ill, ._~m~'__~r_'lIIIIIIIlIBIrt._.'1i I g!~mrll~;lIl!
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Iii ..-_-_~"4.~Rlir,q'_I_I_..1
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ '" it" '," ~"'f'"' ","' 'IX
Link Distance (ft)
,( ~"", ,
Volume (vph) 72 87 136 35
--_~I~~
Adj. Flow (vph) 78 95 148 38
235
232
3058 2952
1IIIil,"'~.1I11'f!1ii"
91 906 26 121 952 46
- "'~'" ,~""" - ~-,
2684
2276
I"
Turn Type
99 985 28 132 1035 50
, .'.D,..r_liJdEmiJ..
Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm
. .eH .iIIF~fI_.
4 8 826
1_IiIl.lIli___lrr~l.
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
. .., ..-ili-rlili . . ~
': ~f$t~~;ggMm,~~_/~~'0~ ""
22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 53.0 53.0 0.0 53.0 53.0 0.0
~__.. . "11111..___:
16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0
'_R~~l!l10l!i!___2ili_4f~illi2l1", ,..,'
~07i~~~"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.II_I--II~
'",'~~ilU'_~
None None None None None None Max Max Max Max
E4EIIII" ..... .~
11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0'" 11.0' 11.0
. . '~ll111i.lII.r~_~.__
17.0 17.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0
"~'~il'" ,-,
v/c Ratio 0.82 0.32 0.73 0.53 0.98 0.82
.1DI_~.IIIL.lIL liIIIIIlIr~JIIlIIli.._.ilIlI. IWP/
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
_ 1ll11l.---I.'1III'_1iI1II1II_~.B~~lIi11__ii
LOS DAD B F BEe
255
252
Perm
Permitted Phases
Minimum Initial (s)
Total Split (s) .
Maximum Green (s)
All-Red Time (s) .
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Flash Dont Walk (s)
Act Effct Green (s)
17.0
17.0
0.90
0.88
WilsonMiller, Inc.
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Immokalee Dr.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
197
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Approach LOS
C
C
C
C
90th %ile Term Code
Max
Max Max
MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code
Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code
MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
II _~~IIlllllIi1"'IIIk"
10th %i1e Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~ "~II -_11....... "'. -- IlilL ,~-
Queue Length 95th (It) #179 47 #226 105 #94 #555 #95 #701
~ 'JlliIIl,,, lI_n I~R ;,4IIIIIIl1Ii1l ..blll'l _ ~ .- I
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
~r-~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~,..l~
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Length: 75
__"'W0l~ljlltt_lIl!!l~?i1i_'3i"%_k0m~'~I'I~'~''''c ..,,~
~~~~~~Jt.aDll;;ma!.ifmB~I~
l'Jatural Cycle: 75
.-j. ~"m~ ~~-;~-j~~~\I&f_:S/
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
-'_'_~IBf_rE'_",JIJ_Lil~_c;:l_"". .
I~~_tw__~~~[f""
Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.4% ICU Level of Service G
~1I ~I - - .~lIl1lIl1II!!llIlilI'.III~_~"i-~":IlIliJL.i
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 75
lJi__1ff>l<.' ...."'?r&~'l1_lfhlll._"_.."i!l1. r::_I"II'f'iliF:I'I<"ulill"_~"!l5,"t0kW_'1i'____
~mi~lt~L~h1ij.'&rdl~i1%~furd:~ 8%~;WL~1tl:tl%~~jziliwIDw_ilfm~~i:~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 75
m ''', i;l_~iilll_~]l_lfI- -:~:'7:1VC )itb-;<"\lM'
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70.4
r: ~~~Jrtll.r".'.")"+; ..liP:"': ." 1'''. ....m '
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
"iii'
W',N
x -"'''''w
.~;~-
-" -,,,,-
Splits and Phases:
~~
3: Immokalee Dr. & Fifteenth Sl. N. (SR 29)
~:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Fifteenth 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
'Be
198
'l8C
199
~
$
~ ~ 0 N <
,
,.; N '" Iii 8
~ ~ M
.
.
.
~
.
E
~ ~ ~ .
::; ~ ~ 0 ~
~ " ~ E
~
<
B 'f
. 2
ii ~
~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ M . ~
<0 .; .; N N " .; .; .; m .,; ~ ~
~ ~ N ~ ~ 2 ~
. . <
< ;; 0
, .ll 0
.,; 0 . ..
u > ~
0:: s .
< < ~
'E M ~ ~ . ,. 0
;;; ~ ~ 0 E ~ ~
~ ~ ~ M ~ .
0 ~ ~
~ . B
.. ~ < \:
~ ~ 0
l- I :g < ~ ~
, <
.. ~ 0 . ~
.l< N ~ M M M 0 M ;: ~ u i . .
.. :; ;\ M :; " ~ ~ ~ ;! ~ ~ ~
...J N N ~
- ~
.
.. j
S 0
N .
c1 <
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0
..:
'" ~
J: ~
;l; .. : ~
- ~ <
0
u m .
.
.
~ 0
~
.
i .
~
" ;\ ~ M e
~ M :; "
..
,
<
<
~
.
~
~
X
..
~
.
0
!
,
j
j
h
'Be
200
15th St. (S.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
.-..
0>
N
0::
(f)
'-"
Z
-
(f)
..c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
('1)('1) ~
N............ u. 19
......lC ~271
14
Lake Trafford Rd. ~~/ Lake Trafford Rd.
/ ~
83 1f
130-4
273~ .-.. li)N'<t
co...... ('I)
0> ('I)'<t
N
0::
(f)
'-"
z
-
(f)
..c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
~
u.
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
"Be
201
~
-
"
.
-
,
'"
t
~
\.
~
.'
4> "I ft "I ft
,., """'."P'lIil""$JI!rIlIIf--.
. ,.,.~~!M~ I-.~
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
'._~~_Illd'" ,.
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
'.' '-. '.", ..'-.....--.... ili_"I!i_jjlrilllj~'"'lli.I_ --
~~~--~~....,.
o O' 0 0 0 0 0 '0 '
7.':_.'.._~IIilIlIII\\~
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
IL-lflt -........1., ...,.' .
Fit Protected 0.981 0.998 0.950 0.950
_M'~illI!IJr"'~'9lr.~_.Ir-'..-.j;~~.~iII_
Fit Permitted 0.614 0.980 0.148 0.487
~ ---- 'l"1111Jm,..----lil"lIIIV"---<tA"1r_"T.-"'.__
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~'liJF~'l!!j--''''~----..._r~~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~I""'---~~_~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~-~.''''''''~
Volume (vph) 83 130 ..2~3, ..14 271 19 365 ..~12 ,34 37 413 123
Lane Configurations
~
Storage Length (ft)
200
.t
.7'.
'0V"""
", ..+
Total Lost Time (s)
o
Trailing Detector (ft)
90 141 297 15 295 21 397 37 40 134
Turn Typo: Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
iIr'~_lIIh' , 'G*
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
,.
22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 16.0 43.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 0.0
~_1Ii>0'1'" ~.....,
_ . ~tj
16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 12.0 37.0 21.0 21.0
":-'.:"1, ,:.iIIB~fr'"~ i~l-""'---'
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0
-1IIl'l1IIIIlIl1_lII.__I_."~!IIIIIIIP~~_
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
~~i lll~~_":~..-~ 111Jf~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max
r " ,. "'::11,"1(':' '"',7 .' ,. L." _--
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
ar-lj!llillflll'l!lD_.iIIIIIIJIII1iIir!I:iilUI_~iiB- '-__~~1lIlI
Act Effct Green (s) 16.7 16.7 16.7 39.0 39.0 23.3 23.3
r~"~mlIIDIlfillllllllllllll~:"I!L_IIEiIIIIIll_1lIIIIIIIDf' 'mm.
v/c Ratio 0.77 0.47 0.69 0.89 0.43 0.12 0.86
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'aG
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
202
~
-
')
..
-
,
'"
t
/'"
~
~
.'
B
C
C
C
Approach LOS
90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
.~Ii!~--~?","",,__
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Gap GaR Gap Hold Hold MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #184 51 194 #254 147 30 #390
'"
Turn Bay Lenglh (ft) 200 200 200
III n~II1~--H IIlIIII I:JrUII___-II_
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,"'Ii'
II
tll'f-~f!8IIIll~'~~
.", "',",'
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 59.2
___" '" . .lIl1lilr~,'
~. ~ .--- .
. .. -
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
I~ts.:nd Phases: 3: Lake Trafford Rd. & Fifteenth Sl. N. (:Ji..4
'*\.5 ~l'l>-06 :-':V.s
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
,;
a:
'C
~
~
..
~
I-
"
-"
..
..J
-
..
e;;-
N
Ii
!!!.
..
VI
.c
-
It>
~
~
M
~
m
~
"'
~
~
~
M
m
~
~
'"
o
o
o
~
m
~
.,;
o
"-
N
o
m
~
jt/)
~
~
M
::
~
N
:ll
~
;!
~ ~
gj
OH
~1
01'
<I);
61
01
~:
~:
:i6
I<l
~
re
~; Gll
co, N
~.
~
~
~j
....,
<'\Ii co
i'!j ~
;;!
oj ~
1---1 ....
::
~j
01;
Ni
~~
m,
M;
~.
or
CD,
Ni
g~
.....;
~j
~i
Rl
C'il
....j
o
o
~
,j ~
....; M
~
lOj co
lM
~! ~
~ ~ ;Ii
N
~ ~
o 0
M
~ ~
a:.oi <()
Nl !()
~
m,
<>:I:
cii
~!
0;):
!
8)1
::1
u
8
~
..
. .
~ E
8. ~~
a. E.S;;
~ ~j
E ~ e
, > 0
g 0 <>
~ ~!!.
'" 'C 0 0.._
O~3NI(1).t:
~ ! ~ i ~ f II
~~~~b~l~
~~{:.~~~;B:
_ fS 6: ~ @: @: E~
8;
C'Il;
.....1
i
0-
"
..
. 0
~ ~ E
g f. e
0-
"
m
~ g
~ :i:
~
~ .~
E "
f ~
~ ~
0-
.
.
"
z
'Be
-"
~t
~"
w.
.9~",
~ . .
2 E
. ,
~.15
u<<>
n
j
-ri
<<
~
.
0-
~
.
~
.
o
S ~
.
,
o
u
.
.
<<
203
"
.
~
~
~
.
in
~
~
~
! ;
III
.0'
raG
204
15th St. (S.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
..-.
0)
N
0::
en
---
z
-
en
..c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
4=
co 0)('1) u::
NCDI'- ~108
......lC 306
16
Lake Trafford Rd. ~ ,,/ Lake Trafford Rd.
/ ~
84 1f
146-4
309~..-. ......Ii)CD
o ('I) Ii)
0) ~CD
N
0::
en
---
z
-
en
..c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
~
LL
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
205
~
- ").
.
-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
LaneConfigurations
.t 7' 40 1j~'"" 11,...
~~jlJ 1"" .., .T~' ':. '_..lII11IIl
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
.. "'ilfiIII_ilm~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
1I1...I.'-"".r~~%1Rmm!-liiI!liIIi""'~l.lll_~~~~r_
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
!iIIWI~1i 'Yi!l"" ....dL,~
Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
R ~bL, ~ ,UjiiJJJI:IIIIIIlilIIII__ilj".;IlliIIII:~l_
Fit Protected 0.982 0.998 0.950 0.950
_;.lIr-_m'm~i<~.l;iI_-r.~JII..~i'liill..._:!IIIIII
Fit Permitted 0.402 0.983 0.082 0.371
1- ~~I"~-",*"Im!illilli~-W~'II_~' I~"~_
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~II"'~."~"~~~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
--'~lIld'" " .,
Link Distance (ft) .,,, 2684' 2276 2084 2338
_-_!iIllE~__liIII:4lBll~If-'"''''''''__
Volume (vph) 84 146 309 16 306 108 401 635 56 173 769 128
. ""W' ".. ill'" .., ... ',T'"'' ""IiI~.-1l!ll!
91 159 117 436 690 61 188 836 139
= C;H_
pm+pt Perm
c
200
Turn Type
" p "." "-C"
Permitted Phases
, ..
44826
, ....]IIi1N~jl(......
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
~~lIijiJ' .'d' Z~
Total Split(s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 20.0 69.0 0.0 49.0 49.0 0.0
r_~I~~1lIIIl1J_.~~__~~_~~
Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 16.0 63.0 43.0 43.0
~:ilIJl'.II-_II,\II.lli!_~!11__!"'..IHi'lriJl'l1ili?1I."'~_>i!_';Il!_*'_Jlti%_t_rn_
~__"~__.;I.l\!...ll!Ull"I'_'''.~____
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0
H,,,~ "'.:' . .v,cc",', $'" . "w~~~IE?:t ~illI
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
<,,_IIl_.' ., 't.,' "LX' , """ . "___""\...__0
~*L ' ", ~.'~~'EKlN'~~~lft
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max
....,......"..'.."'Ic'...IllIIlEI'.L '.." ,&" " .' "'1111IIII1181
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
;:~.. . ill" .~dl1iill1!lll,.: "-~*"f3f '", ~,. '.~_
Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 65.0 65.0 45.0 45.0
, ... ... C '''''m''''Wt'' ....., ..,.'. !J/1'&l111h"" 'IT1~.,.,"'R..;.I_li'S;lill_i:i"'4k'41!<if=_.krii1lS;1lI_l.'ilIIIlIl""_
~~~~~~~i~l'Y.~.'._-.~
1.24 0.50 0.96 1.22 0.63 0.60 1.18
v/c Ratio
WilsonMiller. Inc.
15th St. (S.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
I-Rr--
-- ,
206
~
-
"
..
-
" '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
E F
Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
\ 0>'" ,
Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
w
E
-,r~;fL3
90th %ile TermCode Max Max Max
~1IP1i\r?l~'
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max
~'"
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max
II ......-;
30th %ile Term Code
10th %i1e Term Code
Max
Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
','llD1~._~J-'-
Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
"_llIiIL.iIIII nllll._"~Zill -,
#352 65 #485 #486 171 #994
" r" '1Wii ~'i :1
J
Max
. .
Queue Length 95th (ft)
-...,
~~.
Turn Bay. Length (ft)
.: . ~lfI!iIll'lIIii_~~_Jl\E\OIiJl:
Maximum v/c Ratio, 1.24
.....JJ_li.. .'..' ~'T ".
Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.7%
__OC~_.
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 100
1IlIIIIIII!Ili~_."t.'
50th %ile Actu~ted Cycle: 100,.,
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 100
I::" ..~. .'IJ___--&;-III_li1Ir.ll~_ilII ~ .~.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
.... ....,.. ,...",:u ,.............. ',. '" ""'. "'"
ICU Level of Service H
. .
. ....rnr" II
L""i
, .? ..;. bot ,"
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
I~.~.. "-
'" 05 i1!!lJ~ 06
3: Lake Trafford Rd. & Fifteenth St. N. (SR 29)
}~
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
"".
j Be
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd. 208
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
~ - " . - , '" t /'" \. ~ .'
Lane Configurations .4> ~ 'I tto.
''1 ., '.1[.1!'~1I!
200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
.@ .'
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, ,-.-'-~~~~
Lane UtiL Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95
IiIIiII - "~IIIlIIlllIIII'r~~_".1
Fit Protected 0.982 0.998 0.950 0.950
-., ~~. --~T -i~__IIII~'-'_iII.lIJ.II.111 .llflllr~ liB
Fit Permitted 0.538 0.983 0.174 0.380
-
Yes
,
!jJ
,f!
Headway Factor .
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Yes Yes
'._Mil__
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Right Turn on Red
Yes
tit!^' T'
. a
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~. =.~---
Volume (vph) 84 146 309 16 306 108 401 635 56 173 769 128
~~~j~*.~----"
Adj. Flow (vph) 91 159 336 17 333 117 436 690 61 188 836 139
, 'illlli1lllll~I:.I_"~.T.1II1iIIIJ
Perm Perm pm+pt Perm
. l1tili.!!I'411l_Ii"iii!ll~..tIiti41i*-I!M~ill~ri!l'::;'~IIl-II' ~'-
~ '44.~II!M'IIIRI1f.L!If!Il!Il!_Il_IIl~k,=Jr!illlrl!:~_ .~
4 8 2 6
.M"IlIl1IIIIlIIIIlII_:gfllliillillllWiliii>3-11
10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
Perm
4
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0
mI_)III!lilfi&f1 . ,
_!Iml'.iW '
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 15.0 38.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 0.0
_.1iIf"..IIlI?'-TIill*i__ilt_!llI!~lm'!"!>'1'I_~Iil>! ,., ~
~~~l~~,!il~~J!j~f4t!'~B~~~~_ """'j,,
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 11.0 32.0 17.0 17.0
_______._.I..!Iml~~
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0
II . . ~_JlI!IIlI_._.]]ii1 : ~III
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
,_.j;._T'.:..i'!"bUilil!....-..'_.- . . ,.".. f!__...'....~5... '."'__" 1!_
ffl~fiDm~ tr~~..~mii.~jDl1\t;.iJ~"i'lP~Rfj
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max Max
'.I!M!liIl." ,
!ill~, jt~;
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
...... . 'T . .11III' "III riRlf n
Act Effct Green (s) 17.6 17.6 17.6 34.0 34.0 19.0 19.0
_.__mL.____IlllLHII
v/c Ratio 0.84 0.48 0.86 0.96 0.71 0.83 0.87
_tlllilE""..........'-"_llf____~""'-..--ll!lra-_.'~jl!-~~j.fIY.Rl-1!M
~_~i!HI_~i$fJl1;rm__~~'RB;1$;~~j0c,~~f1ffW!Im~~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
""~1~_II_'I..I.I.IiI'''''''IliI.'"-~2iiiil~~~''jlij1I!!f.!lj~ilIill''iIt0I~1>~-i'lll-
~]_l . .__~!m ... ~~~K~." w, , ,j9&i&ii'tm_",,"if4S~~~~j~
LOS DAD D B D C
WilsonMiller, Inc.
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
Be
209
~
-
")
.
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
!
.'
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
10th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Hold Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR
50 #300 #271 293 #167 #273
:rum Bay Length (ft) 200 200
0 0 0 0
3: Lake Trafford Rd. & Fifteenth Sl. N. (SR 29)
..J~.' ::~:
WilsonMiller, Inc.
0 N ~j '" ... <oti N N on 0 "
... '" ... ;! '" ~! '" '" ~
on f'-; N '" ~
;:
e
'"
0
-
B
.
oj :c
on '" ~ ;! ~ ro! on .. on ;;; ..
on I'-j N' on '" E
0 c
.;: E
-c CO ~
"
a:: .. ~
<.l .
'C .
~ Ul ... ~i '<1: on .
~
~ CO '" ~, ~
"'- wi on 0
.;: :c
CO CO .
~ ::;;
I- ..; ~
.. .. a:
.>< ~ ." u
CO N '<t! <01 '" l? i
...I .
J: '" Ni .-; on i" ~
- "'. 0: C"J; '"
- C\i! ":j ~ ~
CO 3E
. J
0> J ;;
c
N '" 0 01 0: 0 0 ;;
.... 0 <
It: 0 8! O' 0 "
c:> "'- (<); '" 0 :;
N N"i ii '" " . !1
!i N " C
N! i" 0 u
0 c
~ " 0
..; '. ~ ~
Ul . 0
E " 0 a: .
J: 0 . " "
- '0 "e- " u
It) '" al! all '" > ll. ~ ~ 2
.... '" co; Wi '" c .... n .
0 o~ 01 0 . .. ~ '" E
E '. '. 'iii
c ~ 0 ~ .
'" .. " E .
i 0 0; 0: 0 '. ;,; " 0 0 ~
;\ ~, 0' ... <( . ~
1"-; ~, .. 0 . " '" 0
'" ;tj ~1 ci c
" 0 ll. u , .~
N . N . 0 n
i" " 0 C N I '"
c e
.. . " m ~ '"
15 .. '" 0 . "
!'!. 0 ~ 6 .
.... " 0 " ll. E
'" '" . " ~ "
i i '" '" " '" . '"
~l .... .... "
j-o. ~! 0 .... .... .... c .
no '" :> :> .. " 0 0 1ii .
r~ ~i ~ '" '" 15 '" ::; ,! '" E
N ~ ~ .... ll. W 0
! I - ~ € '"' @: € ;:-0
- >
;,;
.
15
z
:;:
'"
o
N
'0
c~
>.~C
o 0 t'
~ m~
"'.::&:u)
~ll.
'"
>. u,~ ~
::.2!.:t:::5::N"
(I:l 0 (I:l 0 ~
oo:~;:
....
'"
~
o
N
:>,,x >. \il
rtl (ll C (I:l u-o
S:~~~!f~~
0- II) Q.) III "0::::'
;:: (I:l W W ... C
I-Ol/)3;I-"g
.... -
g.; E
o .
:;: E
~.
~ 8e
210
o
on
...
N '" ~1 '" ... co! ., ~
'" ~ ;! '" en! .. N
N O)j ~, '"
I
~ S
'" N
o
'"
It) Ni
'<t OJ!
......!
~j w
~ c.;;
II1II
~ I- oc ~ I- ~ ~ I- oc ~ I- OC
00 ro 00 m ro 00 m m m m m m
z z z ~ ~ II) W W W ~ ~ ~
,
!
~ ~
i '
, !
hi
40-
'I
200 200
4.0 4.0
0
'Be 212
t /'" \. ~ ..'
',tor"
200 200 200
~,. .
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
,
0 0 0
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
~-" .-,'"
Lane Configur~~on~ .t 7'
.. "';.
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200
~~,." ,''} c
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0
4.0
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
'.~ rl:!l"V"'-~-r'..""'-_.]I::!IIIIUIIr_IDIr~
Fit Protected 0.983 0.998 0.950 0.950
.---IJI!'mmlJm-""""'~~__
Fit Permitted 0.311 0.981 0.077 0.249
IIIr-"."-'-..IlIl1I1lMrlili
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~"li""~' iil"IUIIII_-'liIII1IfB11 [1111__11111I' II
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~r""'m~...I_
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
__ '" v' 5'" ',' 1i_~1
Volume (vp~) 87 158 343 21 348 202 461 750 62 216,., 939 14~
Adj. Flow (vph) 95 172 373 23 378 220 501 815 67 235 1021 162
~..JIlilIIl._~,.' ,','__~
Turn Type . , ., '-Penn e., "Perm Perm pm+pt Perm' ,., "
__rilm__i~"'IIiIIIlr"'ii,_.IiIIIIIIWlIli'_
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6
_~__1Il!D,~5iiiiflli1m!m!____"i'm!'''i'9'iflJl'_'' ",___.M__",..,
~~6,~mtF!f~~~~WFJ~~. "
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
_, '.'. _....J.4lf'~__!Iii1!~i.,~!lfl$__]Jji!iililitl!i'il5!jfj_lW,6!IIiliR~i!Ii!"-4
~~~~~.lliill'$,_~~."'ijfj!~~~~xrmg~}f~0t15~;E.J~%~~~'".~
Total Split (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 22.0 74.0 0.0 52.0 52.0 0.0
flfjil_ir_~__~,'Rrlr"_$""""Hr~!!l\:_"&__""_!llIfnMmrrl'ln"'li1i""""IB!;1IlL1\1119l~Wrili1!__ii..Iiil.~r'"
~!lM!H!n1t\~gjfjfu!f~~l~~~i!l~~;;~~ft:~~mJ~Ii~~~:I~~},;!l~~~ifPt~.
Maximum Green (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 18.0 68.0 46.0 46.0
_~Jlf..~l!ll__"fli<fi_ll'Ill'."'~_'if%r!_1jj"_I!Ifi_lIl!_I1i5j:f' '.. ,., ,
_~~~~6,~!€.~~w@~jif',40@tl~rniWi~~~~ _ . ....
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0
_'_, . '_' """,'riJl]hi,i .i1l.i1l?4'l___"dIM_'lllWdk"rIlili""'_J ~ ~'.',
~~~t~Jm*~~~_~\2i~Hm~ffiJ:~" ..~
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
, ''''''~'''''~ ..f.' ....."r_...w"
;: :' ,<" " " ,ill
. "", m . .... ... iiW.' ,,'C
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max
__ft_L!l.W___lli_,j_Yfiyl~.i1lL'llI_L'$I'iliiiS!' .,.
~liI~~~;~gr~A"~~~~%_?. ~~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
",_~;m_"1ril4l!iltfijililJlf"'IiS':"""%?llSf';l~"iliiiiiliiiS!i!j~~'if%l!Ijj",-"'t.:rll.Jlllllll._~"'-1iII!iIll
~~_tlM:tilJl!~ngKilliiU4E~W%!lillJ&:41tW'~~;%illUID!l!t~!mlf4I1MW3f.. . ... ... . ... ..~!iIlls;"1l .
Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 70.0 70.0 48.0 48.0
1lW""_""~",Ul,t. ..." ,,-, , .'1'" Illili""JiiG'ffiE_0li'''_,..I j
mi~?~gmd" .b:/\' "'.,.' " ~~~!. ~~
v/cRatio 1.59 0.53 1.19 1.40 0.75 1.16 1.48
2.0
2.0
"
j)
Yes Yes
'.-
Max Max
r:'
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'8e
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
213
~
-
"
.
4-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
,
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
. .
R
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
#434 96 #742 #637 566 #353 #1419
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200
~.- ~~-...
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ,-
Cycle length: 110
'_iIll.!I;r)iJlrikfm'__""!IIl'''~'_kTi''",~'^~0__~MM''_'''''''''''''1:'''''''r!iMaF'....+'..........'..'!fiCrtrhl\_"'l&i14il
t~,tm~__ll!:'i r~~~~ ~~~fi~~;zn!fj~il~~0M~~~
Natural Cycle: 110
_~ ~~'''~N~Y~4 '~~,. """C"~"nrf:;'t~lIi~__]11t&Utlli'4BiE9i~.lrriltLf~~
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.59
.. "'lIl1I1mBBlill.---"'1ll1iil.1lIlIliil_1iiII~"-
Intersection Capacity Utilization 142.3% ICU Level of Service H
ltIi '_rlOf-lIJIlI1'_4i'IIillmillIII~AilIililIiIII1~lil~r"'~"\~.liniiflll~.I--
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 110 ' ", ,." .. . '" ',,, .. ,
il'7~"" _.~--'tli''10iii;trj''''''''''2,0+"F..jBl''kddllii''!:r'2''i1!i~'rIllHHlii'''''rl,if=~Frr10!hJtKr4"""i..)fMl!!"S*,&..'Frn)_I'~
it~~;J;li!f;~~f!i1~fimttTI~i?l;iJ,lili~&1'il]t;;1!~'jV:'W?a~\!t1~~~1~~J[4;1;1tm0~J~~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 110
1J.JI1 ~-''', ilrY~-'_:iillii.'illlWJl_~li1JFIIiIIrilliii""'ljill..~iII]f'!__
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 110
1If'.-'-n-"IlliJlJl\f-oIY~iij1illi~J.,<<XWFJIIIIl!llIisi!:inill~8!i1ll1l1liltr1RlllJilljfjiw__
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
11".__"""''''I!lii'if''''''''''''''''v..'''__lB...'..''''''''..........iim_r..trihi,i''...''!iIllilIIII'dC""''''''''I!llir.~
_l_!!IIIli'~_!Dl!Il\\lIj[m!!Y~"",,~! . wiiill!!illl...' , ..... !i1L~lllBi:lllill . .
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
g:
3: Lake Trafford Rd. & Fifteenth Sl. N. (SR 29)
:r;:
.~
:g;;,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'Be
214
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
,.-..
0)
N
0::
en
-
z
-
en
.c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
0)0)(0 ~
'<t('l)...... LL "--202
:rt~ p-348
21
Lake Trafford Rd. ~ ./ Lake Trafford Rd.
/ ~
87 11'f
158-4
343~,.-.. ......ON
(0 Ii) (0
0) '<tt-
N
0::
en
-
z
-
en
.c:
-
c:
Q)
Q)
~
LL
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at lake Trafford Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
, Be
215
~
-
"
.
-
'-
'"
t
I'"
\.
~
.'
Lane Configurations
200
~~"".i"''''"' ,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
, Be
15th 51. (5.R. 29) at Lake Trafford Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
216
~
-
"
~
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Approach LOS D C D E
~!tBlllllllllll1'[II~"""-~'-~
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~1II8IlIr~iII!iIllIiIl'm'-"liIIlI
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~"~-~"~il_'"
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
~ m LUll' _ ,~_r- IWi-_
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
1liiI1.1._ldJ iIillilil_
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
- UR...I".r ~"'.mlrll'l 1~__jl.lIl11l~t .1I~!!IIBlII! ~-;-
Queue Length 95th (ft) #242 53 #257 61 #372 129 #237 #377
. , _11II"- IIII.~E" !ff!'!~'IIIlIIIIBBIIIIIIIIIIl_~
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 2?0 200
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~r~_.__
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iiIl!L____~
~ . . ';;$$
>'1'"
Natural Cycle: ~~
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.21
'j"
, .nl_:_
ICU Level of Service G
'.' ", Irilli-"---Iiii"--_u",,'''_]U
0:" .",gm;~i?L~~""E0t_~. __
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
_~"'~-_'F'"','" ...,n~.,,_..M '-..
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.2%
~~
~-
}'"
1 Oth %ile Actuated Cycle: 65
'%i" ,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
. K , ,..111iII1lI1J11lIilllllf
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
.JI'f, 06
3: Lake Trafford Rd. & Fifteenth Sl. N. (SR 29)
=~:
~
Splits and Phases:
[~.,
.....05
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
218
ti
.
v ro ~ "
,
.,; .,; m <D 8
v ~ ~ ~
.
.
.
.
"
.
E
.
ro ~ ~ ~ >
N :; ::\ ~ 0
~ ~ E
~
c
. '.
0 2
~ .
;;
~ ro w w 0 v w ro ~
" N "' ": .,; 0 ..; <D N .; ~ ~ 1'l
~ N ;! ::\ ~ ~ ~ N W .; .1! .
;;
. . c
~ ]; 0
" u
0 ~ ~
u
. . ~
-c " c '"
0
m m v m . ~ .
> ;! ;! N ~ E ~ ~
iii ~ ~ .
0 ;;
III ~ . .
~ c
., c 2
'0 E ~
co , c
'5> >- 0
U\ ~ ~ . U
~ w v ~ ;0 ~ ;! ~ ~ ~ ::: ;; ~
ro ~ ~ ~ v
., >; .
> .
W " ~
" w
- ;;
co .
-c ~
a: ro ro v v V N N N N N N
0 0 N N N .; .; .; .; .; .;
~ N N N N N N N N N N N
0 i i ~
. . "
> > .
. . ~
. . c
.
. ~ 0
~ .
. .
.
~ ..
~
. .
.
;; ~
N 0 0
;: ro ~ ~ ~ w ~ w ;! ..
N W V ~ ro v ~
..
,
c
c
~
u
~
..
~
,
..
.
"
!
l
~
h
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
rac
220
~
-
"
..
-
,
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
..A.. D '"'DJB1l1lil11-mr_lIriill] IIIIlml1li11..IllII[1i!] LII'--"'IflB"'" -d
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
- -~r 1I!l!ll111111-'1 IJlIj 1Iil1__- _ ",11~1 I~.
Pedestrians
Ii 1--1. Ir--.-i!----.-..-.'- - T1[""11 ..-. ---- J -'-11
Walking Speed (Ns)
- 1~11I1iII1..;II__!l~ir-r~ I""-:!::r i.~.lii I '-1.
Right turn flare (veh)
III Ill' fll1!"'--- .JIII_-~-'-'~"--.'ln-l.l1l1m .il ,-.- ~w-, I
Median storage veh)
1-' .. --"V!----.'IIIIIIM-N'WlII W J.L'IllIl..~ I_~"- .~
pX, platoon unblocked
Will r[ Jill wlIILlI'--~"---"
vC 1, stage 1 coni vol
__ifl - iIImlm--'''-.~IIIIII_..."Jr-''''''~-
vCu, unblocked vol 167 174 859 767 145 841 786 158
IIJIlI! -~ . '
tC, 2 stage (s)
97
82 67 96 91
68 94
Volume Left
178 49 32
16
~lIIfIIIli~~~jllrili!l.ul_
Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 3 79 62
---:
Lane LOS A A
;r,
'1,
Approach LOS
Average Delay
lE'''IIIllll!! 11~llllIIIIII!Irl1'l!I-"IIIiii
Analysis Period (min)
12.6
'-pI
15
" '
"
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
221
;;l; ~ ~ ~j '" N ~ M M m ~
M '" ~ ~ N M m
,S
0 .~
, "
.;: a;:I! ~'"
.. M M ;I; W .
l: ~ ~i ;': ....i En .
.. .
< < .
U ~ g E
U) 0 " ,
..clUe
.. u"'>
.;:
.. m
:;; m N;
'" ;I; M
.. M N
,; ~
>
iii ..c: 0
- 0
.. ~ 0> j!
.. M .
"C . ~
- ~
.. - ~ 0
Eo 0 . u .
N . .
0 n
. '" .
.. E ~ 0 . "
> , re . c ~
W 0); ~! " " ,
~! > Q: . ~ 0 w
- o~ 0, C ~ " u .
.. . . ~ '" . ro
.~ .. " .
,; E 0 . '" ro
of oj of < .. ~ ~
0: 0 < ~ u .
~~ ~i ~! ~ ~ . 0 " Q.
. '" ~ >
Gi ~, Ni <"if 0 < "
re 0 Q. , 00
s: . N . n 0 .
~ ~ , 5 N I
< E
~ . '> 0 m ~ ,
0 .. ~ 0 . "
"" 0 0 .
~ re 0 " Q. >
00 00 . ~ ~ ~
o! . '" . 0
:5~ 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
('<); co; ~ ~ ~ e
0 !j ~l => => .. 0 0 ~
~j 00 00 15 00 ~ . ~
~, ~ ~ ~ Q. ~ ~
~ " M ;c 0: 0: E:
"
.
15
'" ~ vi z
N ~l
;;l;
;;!
~l :8i :g J::!
;;!
..
M ~
N ~
m ~
..
~
~
~
:;
;I
o
m
M
1
~. 8e 222
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
"0
2=
co
III
Q)
"0
..!!1
Ol
.....
Q)
>
CD CD CD w
li)1...... 12
~489
"" 77
Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) /' Oil Well Rd. (CR 858)
72 /' "" T
464-i
23 N'<t'<t
"0 ('I)O'lOO
>
co
III
Q)
"0
('IJ
Ol
.....
Q)
>
w
8e
',8".- .
. if;".. .
'!Mm
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
223
~
-
"
.
-
'-
'"
t
/'"
\.
~
./
. 4-
00' II .. . . i" .. 'Q::~Ntt;;. \2""'''''!,,''''' '102"'"
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
-"'--'-..!IIIIH'Wk_""ik_'~1.lir.~'ifi_'" '~"rJ9.k1k!l'__'Jiiliiia"'_lFrdDIIIliJi
~10A1i_$$Wr'~:' ". ... J~l~~~;~UJ_~M' ....~
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
......llllllll..__w'"'' ... ., '., "::1
Pedestrians
-- ~1IIIIIIIIIiIIII_--iili11l1Rl:"lmllfllll1~IIIIiir~..:I
Walking Speed (ftIs)
-~. ~---.' ....?iliiiS!_A~&r-hi.ij1lllfill'lllll1lii1Jli(_~I"'-""'.".."..,_., '""0"'_..
------- .... '.. ....,. '_1_
Right turn flare (veh)
_......".._~..'~..~.,rli\l.IIIiIIlA1..mll1lll1Ufl"-'~II.[I[I.llll[.IIIJ'"~..1
Median storage veh)
L '~j.r-~-'~~~.IIlIIIl!Pf-~_.-I~
pX, platoon unblocked
____~~ml~-.nI_.ii'-l>~.Jif~_
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
---._I"."~"~~
vCu, unblocked vol 545 529 1486 1385 517 1521 1391 538
.........'jV . .. ,.' .. .. , , IlJJI...III!I
tC,2 stage (s)
.- ~. it" .,. ",. /'j;itii;:~H:U~7 .
"W",
'.0. .
-"'I";''''''''''
, .,'";.~ i!iIll!iIll'
Average Delay 133.1
--~l ~"'~IIi_-"""""'B' ,
.~~6'H.<> i_~."
Analysis Period (min) 15
_----,""'''""......i__"ii''ifI11ifIl%i;Jiklf''k...'__-'0Jj\111-i-~.111'j-*Jl-"'-lw""'",,,,,
~~~:I~.~.M(;:"'."" '=" ";H ~~lfl~~' ',. ~~nlM~l~~_i
Wilson Miller, Inc.
8e
224
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"0
>
co
en
Q)
"0
('IJ
l?
Q)
>
c.oc.oc.o w
li)1...... 12
~489
Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) ")! /' 77
Oil Well Rd. (CR 858)
/' ~
72 T
464~
23 N'<t'<t
"0 ('I) O)(lO
>
co
en
Q)
"0
('IJ
0>
....
Q)
>
W
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
BG
t- r
225
~
-
t
.
-
, '"
t
/'"
\.
~
.'
Lane Configur~tions
40:.
40- <fo. 40-
,........ .~~j"i11Il!~~III~
200 200 200 200 200
'~_l~IiIIiII~~"..l!trll1
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
w .'_!iIllRiII~__
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~_""'~lf--llillf....r~II~I.lIiililIiIIlIII~_
Lane Uti!. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~_ M_-"__~_m~IIIIlI.~",
Fit Protected 0.994 0.993 0.992 0.995
-- ,,~~.,~.....~....._.;IIIIIIt-~~~II__
Fit Permitted 0.872 0.870 0.933 0.957
.. - ....... Ti~-~'111 .. iltr-'~ .....jj~,. n~\llli::._JIIllIIlIl!: III
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~'~li_~~-""1"~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
. ......, "W ....J_~_
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
pIIIIIIIIf~r .' _.~lI_
Volume (vph) 72 464 23 77 489 12 32 94 84 16 86 56
"-0r.;" "-'wr'. '" -""JWi"<w.; .,k j;-----/-~--_ - 1",'"'7'" :~
Adj. Flow (vph) 78 504 25 84 532 13 35 102 91 17 93 61
~~~111111111111
Turn Type. Perm Perm .~erm ,,,,.,'..,,, "'''f... d,~erm
200
200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
Permitted Phases
~- '"
4
~inim~!:" l.nitial (s)
tlIlIIl!jj
Total Split(s)
16.0
16.0
38.0
- '"tp
~.'", ,
38.0
2.0
2.0
Lead-Lag Optimize?
1_-""rn~L_"'_"'_eQ"'1L"'''t4<l'''''~_@f_,''>. .,.'.
~~___JJ..\,gj__~~Si
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
m>mi. I!Iij_.k'l_'-_"""1Jffi""""_m';'4<l'l'';''''';i\;'''~S!.~'l''''~,.yW<'_tr,,"~\iW'_
f'1~~~~~~~~~lW1~~f~irlf/jiJ~~y~~j~S1lliK~'?Jilln_
Flash DontWalk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
","'.' -'-.'.Illl'iil'......itr"'..m".&&fLliUtcl!'21IY'.~'1J""~'i;___/,;
:.E --'~ _~ '(~_~~i~8'dttl~ii:1~inTI~..~1:~'f&il*J?~!iJ~~:~WL~~q(~I&lli;~~
Act Effct Green (s) 26.6 26.6 18.3 18.3
illil!i'l_'h!lm"'__"lkn.__...tlilliiif""'n,,"0Jll'Iik"f'@f.i,i"""~""__"""'",""'JiIk~i___
~~~_~~~~i" "j,"=:~_~f~~}~ifif~W~M!~~4h~
v/c Ratio 0.75 0.77 0.38 0.28
pi1llJ_IilllbU~__itiYJ!-"1fi<4l\9!lIlm'''';0irfJ\ji,,~,jjdrj~~!Z'1i''''''llqlrfF"1iIIIIFa!GliE"''''''''JiIk
"''' """ ~l "',, l;;tL..3~R41R,~,",! ilti!iif._""""mJ!1ii1sm."",,,,,,a.4w!003ti1 "" *n~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
W__i_'.''''''''''''''''.r.I'>'''mrhf3WllJ_"''''J.',.... .irl&~!i' ...ili""...~,.,+FF'..""m.firI'".......'''....'..,',,..'''~trifa,.r1'l&_"
~~~~i~~~Fi1iE~_~lft~~il]fl~hil4r~t~k1Bl~b10ri;'i@~f~J.f01Y4T0ilB1iiL~~~_~~If.illfEtfu
LOS B B B B
-~''41''W
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
~ - "
Be
'~. .
. &~..':
'~.' :.' ,"
, 226
.
-
,
'"
t
/'" \.
~ .'
Approach LOS
B
B
B
B
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Max Max
MaxR MaxR
MaxR MaxR
~Ht.~
70th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
.
50th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Hold Hold
MaxR MaxR
'!
10th %ile Term Code
Min Min
Min Min
MaxR MaxR
MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft)
235
251
101
76
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
11iIII1,"~.1_~I_IIIII'~\lI~J__IIi_._
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
. -..'.. 'r..~" rrr__1..1IiP4iIIIlI
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77
: _IIiJlBiIlF<fJ_n- n-TB V""-....
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1 % ICU Level of Service C
.. .{fIli~.IIIIIr__r1I1i-__
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
'.' . .., IIlIIIIIrlL ~-, "1 :: liIiIIII_
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 53.8
~"__~IIIllIII__illllr"--'~l[[llli~. I n 11r1~.~1"
1 Oth %ile Actuated Cycle: 44
Splits and Phases:
i:
3: Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) & Everglades Blvd.
:3:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
-
01
-d
D::
Gi
3:
i5
-d
>
in
III
Gl
'C
01
2'
Gl
>
W
o
.;:
01
c
Gl
U
U)
01
.;:
01
::!;
Gl
>
<(
.:::
-
;-:
CO
.....
o
N
'"
c
OJ
v ~
.*- en E
... .E <l>
a.. ~ E
J::5 l\l
_~ I- ~
;;: ::;
~
u ~ C
ll.1 .: 0
.~ E g
Q. , >
.... 0
::;
'"
o
OJ
,'0
:;, c: .... """
o ::l tn c:-
J: 0 l: Q.l <n
~ m'c ~ .E
m ~ .... "" (0
~ g ~ ~ .;
OJ :E dl
w
'"
C
N
,'tl
;:! c..r-
o ::l (.)::e..
::t: 0 l':l CJ
.:.:: ~ E E
Ill":': a.::l
Cl u a.-
a.~<t~
'"
~
o
OJ
..::.:::N Ii1
t':J'" >.~
~5~!E
:I: ~
,=
'"
c
OJ
'tl
c-
,~
0-
'....
"'Cl
g~
"'-
u.
U
o
::;
'"
o
OJ
~
;>.5M
~O-
;;: , ....
. "';;:
N-Gcn
,!8Q.
- '"
~ ~.!: Ie
.~ '0'::: s:---
Cl .... ~ 0 ~
Q. .... ~
....
'"
-
o
OJ
"'~ -
III l\l c: >- -
s: &. 0 .g .~ Ul
O_~.:a::::::"'O
~ .rg <:l ~ f! ~
l-~tns:l--g
,
oS
6 ....
> c
o 0
::; E
..
o
-
.. ..
.. -
-
'"
'"
-
-
o OJ ...
o .. ..
-
L() ~ N
;;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I -il
....Ii
..._11
1111
~1
..
..
M
:
0;
CD,
CD;
N-j
"
"
M
..
~I
'"
...
(0;
C":I;
~ ~ c:: ..J
Z Z m OJ I- 0::
Z U') m [l)
<J) "'
'"
...
'"
'"
..
0>
'"
6
"
"'
g
"
~
<0
"
N
.. OJ
.., -
..
..
OJ
-
N
;;;
'"
"
"
N
;::
gj
"'t:
('\I;
N1
:;Jri
Nl
i
c5 ~ 0:: -I I- a:
UJ w CO III m CD
w ;;: ;;: ;;:
;'
Be
::; ...
..
-
'"
..
~
"'
o
:0
~
o
g
~
.
0:
~
,
.
o
w.
.9 .
o E
. ,
.0
.8>
(,) .S
" ....
'"
Q);
(()1
0;
Ri
u
"'
~
'"
-'"
.
Cl
0);
co:
oj
.
~ u u
o .~ IE
~ a: ~
Q) w ~
E .~ "iij
~ <<i 0
"iji c -0
'" '" 0
U Ql e
IE c. a..
{ll ~ III
~ u E
"* ~
~ iE
"' ~
~ ,:::
::J ..
"' <;
u. ....
Q.
"<t:
~~
..
~
"'
"
....
::J
"'
u.
.
c
,
o
U
.
~
0:
u.
U
o
::;
.
~
c.
"'
.
E
,
<;
~ ~
o .
:I: E
~ ,
~ <;
.f >
~ ~
. ~
;;: e
o ~
~ ~
u
o
, N
e m
m 0
~ a
u "
.:l '"
~
"'
Q.
"
..
o
z
_~€~€~E
....
Q
;j:
227
.
.
u
.
"'
.
>
w
"
.
w
.
'"
o
,
o
U
.
.
0:
"
Q.
~
J Be
228
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
"'C
>
co
en
Q)
"'C
co
C>
....
Q)
a >
W
Naco 7
co ..- ..-
~ M41
128
Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) ~ ./ Oil Well Rd. (CR 858)
/",,-
57 T
536--1
'<tCOlO
12 ("<) a lO
"'C ..- ..-
>
co
en
Q)
"'C
co
C>
....
Q)
>
w
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
Be
229
t ,. \. ~ .;
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
~;"""~s",r.4 . ..~... '*'ljlll~~.ii!l~
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
_tli.ir.lIllIIltIIIII~ . r~r''''r _fil!_~I~
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
_~JIIIIIIll!"lP;_ao-ii'.-~~J!
Pedestrians
~_llf"""--"d~~.-__D."'WIr_
Walking Speed (ftIs)
_1I'l~lmm~IIII~_.-rlllltr.Ilf14._Ii!liII1i~iI'.___Il!~W
Right turn flare (veh)
IIJliBEII..llr- . "CJ.~'~~II.~r'=-~iI7~-~' .. '-___lIIIlillll.UIllmr
Median storage veh)
.~,:OIJII "11r1D:JI 1111[" -'_.111I.. ."''''''''!lII1III1II!R:1
pX, platoon unblocked
1IIIIIP-..mr~-..___r~~1iIIIIIII
vCl, ~.tagel co~fvOI ...... .''''.. . ffi.r.
1727 1587 . 589 . 1809 .. 1590 592
_.rr_ll_....
fun i~~~
.,..'........'_
00670082
vCu. unblocked vol 596 596
_~lIIl_~~rlll..._:
.It~ge (8) .. lliI7
pO queue free % 94 86
'" ',,:1) t
Average Delay Err
!i_1JI1_1.....r--'!IlIIl~~IiIliP..--__lf1~lI!illIIIIIIl1r-~
Analysis Period (rnin) 15
r'w.!ltI,it~.l!i!",!It'1;.7__""'_Ii.__,".Sl_,'lXr___"" . ..r'r... . '".," ......
~~1~q~;;.r~__~~kj~~iWm~~.:. ,"'. .,._
WilsonMiller, inc.
Be
.~.~I
230
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
"'C
>
co
en
Q)
"'C
co
C>
....
Q)
0 >
W
NaCO 7
co..-..-
~ M41
128
Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) ~ ./ Oil Well Rd. (CR 858)
7 ~
57 T
536--i
'<tCOlO
12 MalO
"'C ..- ..-
>
co
en
Q)
"'C
co
C>
....
Q)
>
W
Be
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
231
-"
-
,.
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
1iI1....iiii~.iIII~~~lI~...
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
--fIlilI..iII~~11II-'1iIIMII~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
'~'h"Vr" "', ""~4_~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
___'I"-~_~'~'-h.IlII_~-"lr'--l n
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_.'l!l '_"_0tf" ........,....__4'h.. .... .....n
~.iMf~J~!t " '" . ~~ '~:'~' 1~r21 '
Fit Protected 0.995 0.991 0.994 0.995
-"-~"1IIfIIIIIIAl1'~-1~_
Fit Permitted 0.893 0.788 0.947 0.958
'~~~'_SlGSl~,~~__.~w.'~MII.
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~-""IIII-.;"~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_1.111:1 . .& . rrn. .. ;1!llii1il..~IlllIiIIM'"
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
!"._Wl".Wi___lJ!!f.'-. 'rrii\l'-"""-""__~; ~ .;._...._r, .
'aft, "iH)~;l'0fi~~~~Irldl'l~~~ " L ,~
Volume (vph) 57 536 12 128 541 7 34 106 155 18 100
Il'-V_iiifi!.l!i-~~...r:B" crr,'
Adj. Flow (vph) 62 583 13 139 588 8 37 115 168 20 109 89
~-'~-or_IIi~j1_,
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm
-[~h.r.... .:~
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
1I.~~.IInllll!l'~h~iiItI!E'iIIIII
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
gl~n" ... . , ........ T rr'rll~_
Total Split (s) 38.0 38.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
li.~~~. .-. w' ":.l~r'.. ':_
Maximum Green (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
"~"'ull'BIiflj11!illn'0"lI~IIlIP-1irl1l.III'lUIlIfII~"-~""'."'"
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
~I_" "liIIIII'''- 'II
Lead-Lag Optimize?
., '.'n7"" ''If''_.....
"';; ",-y,~,
Recall Mode None None None None
i_. ..~ "WEi\'milllilil%1_;.Jililit' ~ ,. ~ ~"". N .... ...
~_B1WJ4N!i€ui~~Eb~, .'. . ,. M., 1 '"'~,~ . ,1' '
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
--~'L'W"lill~~~il!i!illll!'-'~_lii1'!,\vlr_i!itr"~_'llil1',,_i2i@___"!'>iim.1W_'_
~!i1f0f~_,,~x:;~$iliM1"~jjffi~jlli~f~~~.
Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 32.0 18.1 18.1
-. ... h'I1l!rJ"1'ti_....'.........iJll!_"_._"4SW...'~"_i4_~_.4r_~""..._t""'__;
~"'*~~~~~\i~!t1~~~;I~~~~_~~
v/c Ratio 0.72 0.91 0.56 0.39
.--""']ifili1€"'Nftlli'!1'fi!!l'j7j'lii__:%it\!dw.~_.dj\il1iIX~'l!!llle~'IIIIII-'llIfliJP"'_m_~_'
i'y.~\~.}t",m!~i:?d1?","dlJ_~~~.~~~I~$E! ~~~"~~,~J~Jfg~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
"'.ii""Jrolli'li"".".......Sl5..y.......;'..........Ji1"~jIY.."filjlilijii";............'"..li.._7."'wil'"....;'4SWIit~'.,l!il_~.._ill_...~UiiiliitB"J[~'A_iJMl_<
;~_~~r&~m:S!''Jliili2ict~~l~t"4iJnqyff4BE~h@~liitl~;llii*;~~'t^Th~J:i~]~w;l~,fu;~l'1l~i1~~~_.-jJM~~a~~I:~~~
LOS B C B B
82
Max
Max
1,
Max
Max
w--'-~ '-"',
Wilson Miller, Inc.
J 8e
Oil Well Rd. at Everglades Blvd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
232
-"
-
,.
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Approach LOS
B
C
B
B
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Max Max
70th %lle Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
~1IIII~1." r-"~--L_
50th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
I I....' L- ':IJII"l2<~1 [- -liO I IIT-- Ii" ! ~~~ __
30th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
.....,. H dIIIIl!!f--__-- ~,..t1li!lI\.fllllMlillll
10th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
. J lI" 111!l_wll.IIII1~lr'~I[l1'.!1l 1~_.JII1llllll:ll_
Queue Length 95th (ft) 265 #437 136 95
II 1Il1IIiIIIJIIIi-~1illlllllllllllll__..~~"IIl~IlIlI_
Turn Bay Length (ft)
~--.-..-
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 . 0
'7' 'iVV--1IPI'-jfll__
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
--_______illll__.!mj~_
Cycle Length: 60
Natural Cycle: 60
r m
"^^^V:'"FM
II
. '_I~!fiIIlR_
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 60
~,--, .'m.~-rIl!EIlIf"-- :1".' '___ll1I1l111l1!111
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
~III1I:J1!l11~'IIIIIlUIl~
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50.3
,''''tf0i'
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.5%
ICU Level of Service F
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
~:
3: Oil Well Rd. (CR 858) & Everglades Blvd.
,:
::1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
CI)
u
c
..
~
-
c
W
..
";:
..
:;;
CI)
>
c(
1ii
.,;
0::
a;
;:
(5
rac
,!
~ al ~!
.....!
::!
M ~j
~ '<tj
.;
j
~.
N;
.....,
~.
~.
......;
....!
C\li
~.
.....i
::1
i
'I
~I
co!
'<ti
N.
~l
<'ii
8i
......_!
(\I:
OIj
CXl:i
! OJ
0)1
co;
ci[
0);
Wi
ci~
mi
OJ1
o[
'i
0;
Ni
Ol;
N"]
gj
0;
Ml
o
"
.
>-
~
..
. "
E "
, .
a "e
> ~
~
"
c
o
jj
.
'0
.
~
~
.
E
,
"
>
~
u 0
C I
e g ~
~ 1i &.
. '" ~
"'. .
\: b ~
~ ~ ~
~~€~@:@:
0;
.
15
z
234
iD
w
"
M
'"
;;;
C
,Q
Ji
'"
"
,
o
o
~
.,
C
~
~
"
c
W
~
~
~
~
I
, I
}; "
i'
, !
hi
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
r'8C
236
-"
-
-
'-
\. .;
Grade
0% 0%
0%
Peak Hour Factor
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians
---I~~"
Walking Speed (ftIs)
- nr---~II1..~..mm.lIu".I~~'_!II'
Right tum flare (veh)
--~. I~.~" lII[~lIIIlIIIIIIIr___"
Median storage veh)
~_!ml_r--I -_ 11III1
pX, platoon unblocked
"I!!..
'00;_
'.00--
vCl, stage 1 conf vol
--
vCu, unblocked vol 127 1317 127
_______'!_.II~I
tC, 2 stage (~)
-...
pO queue free %
64
100 47
526
o
o
cSH 1459 1700
~_.Jf
Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 0 81
__Il~~- ''1I.lIIIIbM_
Lane LOS A B
~.iIIJlL__1 mnrrli~~-.'~--
Approach LOS B
Average Delay 9.1
11m ,.-___--1..
Analysis Period (min) 15
L_.j_Ii!JI.__.Ii.~- ,;Ii
.. "I III! I .
-'1lI_~1I.111111IJI
WilsonMiller, Inc,
iii'
'" LOj W
'" <01 1f.
CD M
l,) e
s::
E 0
0
- ~
s::
W '"
'" ~i c
01 '" 0
.;: ~. 0
()
01 '"
::!! :;: c
w
CD '" c; ro ::>
'"
> '" Ol U "
<( '" I,(t I;; a.
N ...-1 ~ 0 ..
ro ~
- I- ~
.. ~ 0 ~
0
'C '. U
~ 0 ~
a:: E U u "
0 ~
4i '0 B I;; ~
'" '" '" 0"1, > 0: ~ 0
;: '" '" '" a:J:i C I-
a a a OJ ~ " ~ a.
E '. .. 0
0 >- 0 u. ~
0 '" ro () E
'" gi ~ 0 U 0
~ ." ~ 0 '0
N I"-:j u ~ B '" >
N ~. I;; 0 0: 0;
0
m N 0 " 0
,= U 0 0 :I:
0 0 N
ro ~ " e '" ~
.. '" m
15 0> a .
!t!- u ~
l- I;; U " a.
'" '" m m '" >-
'" '" ,= m ~
<5 ~
'" 0, l- I- ro I-
~j :::> :::> 0 ~
~ '" '" 15 '" ;:;
CVl1 u. u. I- a. I-
- & € ~ ~ @:
"
~
15
lO z
'"
N '"
'"
~
'"
N
c-
>.:J~
m 0 f-
:;: 5>;;:
N"51J)
ma.
OJ
>-
>- u !:! r;:
.- .~=:: ~
ro 0 r;: 0 ~
Oo:,::~
f-
'"
~
'"
N
~
~~C~U~
~&:g~!E"O
o ';j "' CI) r;: f!!
;: _ ~ llJ,= "0
t- ~ s: 5
:.
$'E
> ~
~ E
rBC
237
N
.,
:2!ti
;:\
...
..
..
...
.,
..
N
'"
;:\ :;;
'" '"
..
'"
'"
'"
~1
..
. -'---,
..J f- '" ..J I- '" ..J f- '" ..J f- '"
'" '" '" OJ OJ OJ OJ '" OJ OJ OJ OJ
Z Z z '" '" '" w w w ;;: ;;: $:
1
i~8C
238
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
Q)
(.)
c
co
....
-
c
W
co
";::
co
~
Q)
'<t ~
lON ~~
COX
Oil Well Road ~ / Oil Well Road
/
697-4
98
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
~BC
239
-"
-
-
'-
\. .;
0% 0%
",-' "'mll;2jj~~i~'~~IIII[II!___
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
r ," _:!>>'~0!ioo:""~,,,"_ISl._1ft._1M_,
b. 6;$~~~~
Pedestrians
~- ~_.It..II!_'::'--~r'-Iil~
Walking Speed (ftIs)
-~IBl!_I..'lIiIlllIIIII!i__lIf.:
Right turn flare (veh)
~~lIllIlIIIIi~~~''IllIIlI__
Median storage veh)
II. '~~~~.1IJPII__'~*"~_." "-'~._-4I!l
pX, platoon unblocked
~__\!~__~illll
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
_'jiil~..; ,.. ,'~ " ,'* ': 'lillllllllBl.. .: .." . ,.
vCu, unblocked vol 165 1740 118
ffii_ilXlitl_,X" hc'.. ,.,"'" "''llI' ill"'r 'llil'X_"l___'I!'1,l>l11l' ''''~~rn''J~:IIIIIP.R~'lit.hilir.'hh_ ' ,:'J+F'6.L,"'hFrllll____. ;
..~am~m~~!II~~~\l.m ..,,^~~'4llif1ifJiU't~'{-I8!Bw~~
tC, 2 stage (s)
ImIll111!1!;':; 'l"'ilil ., ":mrrJlh'~" "j +",
pO queue free % 46 0 24
lii{.All_,4J;;______;r,Liillll_'~
~~xrww_~~~~~j,i,
Lane Configurations
lIr- -'l"~~IIIII.~!lj11
Grade
-
Peak Hour Factor
';""'"') ,.1'''''':'';:
'''ilil.'..$J@'+1E':rlllii+W!!1l'._r&1l.._Uir
'fJ~f0i~_iry~
"',<;)@ . '"
";"'"~',.i", ,. "'~.~~";:'" .:~~ij_~I~
'jd~ ;Y410 ''"'I
'TF''''t ~
F 0~''!L'''tliL__.r__
Volume Left 758 0 89
I~JRlff~ilIl~ii~!/.---~lI:_iil_~Uli...".gill._.if'&,{ll'L'1i1~r8ij~r:n.UiSi~fi2
~~~i.2lli1i!ilfm~ffift~~~~mK... . j'j(".~.Y\t1!iJmt?;@&\Jt\_,,91TIf$lli..,
cSH 1413 1700 289
Average Delay 369.0
-"~_"__glf_:
Analysis Period (min) 15
__llil'illi_ll1i"jJJllil~%F_h&"mlllll,,*liiUi_rJl'~~_..".""lli",'.'''''''cn''+,UL__
~g,~_~~~::g~;~0. .' ~~'ili:~::"^>'''i~rL " ~lt~, '!rID. J.~jyi~j&,**.~U
"'Wi>' ""''''i{ ._"
"1_~~~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~!~ Be
~
240
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
Q)
o
c
co
....
.....
c
W
co
.C
co
:::2:
Q)
>
<(
'<t
lO N
COl ~~
Oil Well Road ~ J Oil Well Road
/
697.-/1
98---7
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
8e
,,,;.-,,,:!t'" .
~ ...'.,
:J'j,.,j
241
-"
-
-
'-
\. .;
Lane Configurations 'i t
.....,.._~.!li'h
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
~~'IJl""">lIllIlIiIIiIlJUMII"'~.~_~"
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
''''Y''.&> .." ~ .... 'w_~r~Mhll~lIIil
,
.,
_~_h.
Trailing Detector (ft) 0
o
o 0 0
-"',;;;'~'~'i![j', ' ", , "J:);! ,
, ~ , ,
Lane Util. Factor
1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
--~E'~.~_iliiS"iill\r_I-lI!wq.IlI._"'J..Jilll""'i_
Fit Permitted 0.495 0.950
-~_I~.H--~.IIIIlIllII_I__I[' I
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
~'JIr' "... ~ ,..', ~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-- -rlrt._._~~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2338
"'l'iIIIlIIIlIliiIiil___il__"~rT~""'IIi_UU_
Volume (vph) 697 98 65 87 82 654
"'~"IS".".. 7:"" ~ :";. 'Y:, ..;>>%
Adj. Flow (vph) 758 107 71 95 89 711
... ~"g-lIi;'Bi"'_!"~.fi"!J!B'''~:liilm_~'-~_.~lilh..I'IIIfr'''Ui!ii!li*:!::l1*~I'i[~%l!!l0Il110--1'
...... 1Iii!!~!!HU€Ji~~tt;1l1lW~~:mIlW~~1m;tljm!f!~dZiRJifk~L, "mwt!f!,.","",,~€~~114~f
Turn Type pm+pt custom
-, ,g',"r"""'''"" '-'i=
'!52F. ""-,,,
"'..ill'..
.....~id....... '. .."h' ._. ~
"il' // ,;;'" ,
,'W4 ,",_ 'd._ _' _,_ ,
~~..
Permitted Phases 4 6 6
.rfjff; '.."r..3i.M'""""r$.JijJl%lillitii!f.!iP~liljJi;_~?I!f~.~lKIIlII~'_'iiii'g;!'v''A~r5'''il<ri%li'UW"ff'"
,~::v~~~~\01f%i;_ ,,:-, " ,_~r~~i1tI?j0!f,"I_r~
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0
.......,'''''...w';c. 'f~~ ,.......'"".jlJ~
Total Split (s) 26.0 48.0 22.0 0.0 22.0 22.0
-.nlm;-1t;jd!lt_'._'.IlD"PEUirlPl~EfjjIJ!i!l!iIl!ll;1k""lii:j/~~i"'~_il'lll!I!"''''!l1UiiEl!k.rJfS1!"'w~~f"=_
_"m_,__R. -"---_L,_.I!IiIIIl__!!iE'I!_~
Maximu~ ~reen (s) 21.5 42,;~'m~6~O~,. l~;D 16.0 f'" . 'I'""......
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2...0 2.0 2.0
-..=,:""'ttiijll'iJj'-"~'II!lll.'!!
~~t?11f2rEtf@UjML,,,#~... ..._. ..._
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
~~llY.Al_~",,*.m,
," 'ir\I__.'!llrt~ilJ(~lliIUi!llful"
Recall Mode None None None
2.0
"
Max
Max
iE!''J;/
.]'..1.
" il1lIIIIll
,., ,~,
WilsonMiller, Inc,
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
fBe
242
-"
-
-
'-
\. .;
90th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Max
MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code
Max Hold Max
MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR
~ 1~-~~.'~.gl_i1I
30th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR
"11II" _ IliIllflk~JIl._~iI_lII!IR.
10th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR
ill 1li~!II~ _IIIlIIIIIIIIIIiIJIIIII
Queue Length 95th (ft) #410 32 70 64 92
l~ - ll11ir-~~I''W''V''''-~~11f _~----
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200
~.
~ ~-1Il
I ill ill~ '1
']111_
~'_.",vw
'.if)"'"
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
" ,llIlIIlI_UiIIIIIllIlIllIII~.'1'""
....,... .''''''"''''~'''m
"'...., "'7,( ~.
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.3%
ICU Level of Service C
~rIIIIIIIIII_i1IilrII!l_
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70
."..,. " _lIfrr_JUI~IIl~j
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 70
IflBn_.", ,...
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Oil Well Road & Ave Maria Entrance
J: _I'"~
~" 00'__
.S
::J
WilsonMiller, Inc.
,{ Be
244
.;
.
~ '" m 0 E
,
'" M ;;; .; 0
m ~ 0
.
~
.
E
.
E
.
M m m 0 >
0 M ~ 0
~ N N E
m
"
~ E
2
~ .
1; "
e ~
N M 0 m v N V ~ M N .
.,; ..: ., <i ..: 0 '" 0 ..: m ~
w M 0 m ~ N '" ~ ~ .
"
. . 0
E ~
, ~ ~
0 .~
" . ~
$ " ;,
" ,Q
,; v . '.
N ~ ~ ::\ E ~ ~
0:: ~ ~ . .
.. ~ "
:> . B
'iij 0 "
~ " g
.~ u
"
~ 0 .
Co . "
E w m N 0 M ~ ~ M m ~ :: " ":
M ~ m N v <
'" 5
u
- u
'" .
.
,; ~
0:: 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ..: ~ ..: 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi
;:
(5
.
. "
. 0
~ .
~ .
.
l "
~
~ .
.
i ~
M ::\ ~ M ~ e
M m N 0 m N M ~ ;; "
..
,
"
"
<
0
"
~
'"
,
..
.
0
!-
.j
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
'ae
246
-"
-
,.
..
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
0%
Peak Hour Factor
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ftIs)
-. I II - -!ll_IIlIlB!_~11IIIIlIIIIIT' III11l111111111l1I1111111JIlEillIl
Right turn flare (veh)
I~ - II........,.'~ .......W~ _~ - ---'11111_1111I1.
Median storage veh)
_ ~ 'I' 11IIU_ -111111 11I1 _ I ,J
pX, platoon unblocked
lIJ!i'lI'I'I~i~ ",on ~ m
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
61
30
378 316
29 339 311
55
tC, 2 stage (s)
~---
pO queue free % 93 99 99 93 99 100 100 93
Volume Left
104
9
8
2
'if_ 1I1ii:lllilnl
cSH
Queue Length .95th (ft)
-'We"
Lane LOS A A B
~~
Approach LOS B
A
_]i'i'-II1I_~'-"'~~__Bi
A
Analysis Period (min) 15
____IlIIIIIIIIIIIII_.I1II11lHI-.I1I-~-Uiiili
~~"'~"'.' .., ,.'n"..~lIll~ '", ..~~nj;
WilsonMiller, Inc.
# Be
247
~ .. "'~ ~ .. co! M ~ ~ M
M 10; ~ N' ~ ..
~I N
<0 ~
~ :::
.
.
~ .. <0 0 lOi M ~ <0 <0 E
,
M ~ N' ~ N '5
>
~
.
~
~
B
M '" 0); M "
<0 ~! ~ ~
0
~
"
:l\ <0 ~!
.,; N C\l:
~
In 0 0 0: i! ~
"iij 0 0 Ri .
Gl ~ M ~
(,r] ~ 0
l<: . "
a. 0 . .
. .
E E " 0 a: . ~
, . "
.. '5 a " ~ ,
> ~ . 0 ~
() '" '" 0>: ~ "
<0 <0 <Xl! " . ~ 'E. . J
- ci ci cij . '~ '. ~ . ;;
.. E . a:
" ;; 0 ~ ~ . ~
.,; .. " ~
" 0 ~
~ 0 0 o~ ~ '" . 0 '5 ~
0 '" 0); 0 . 'e " > 0.
<0 M <IJ! "
('oj; l.i 0 ~ 5 ~
a; N . ~ 0
i= , I .
;: 1: " , N ~
.. .. e :!l ~
" .. if . '5
'" i! 0 . >
0 ~ 0 .. ~
"' "' . " ~ ~
; . ~ . 0
" " ~ ~ ~ ;: .
~j ~ ~ .. e
Or> Or> " 0 ~
(',Ii "' "' " "' ~ . :t
<OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ " " ~ ;;;: e E
"
.
"
.....1 z
(I);
~.~ES:N
2:e2~-
~ ...
~
0;
>
o
"
...1
~ ... a: ~ ... '" ~ ... '" ~ ... '"
al al al al al al al al al al lD lD
Z Z Z "' "' "' UJ UJ UJ ;;: ;;: ;;:
;;
N
>-~ ~ >.. :$
~ff~~~e_
~2~&:2-g=-
1-~V)3: ~
i Be
248
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
"'C
c:::
en
co
Q)
~
Cl..
E
co co
co () ~203
coI"- 108
19
Oil Well Rd (CR 858) ~/ Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
100 / "" T
26--1
3 /'-/'-0)
"'C ("<)
c:::
en
co
Q)
~
Cl..
E
co
()
-
,.
f
-
'-
8e 249
t t' \. ~ .;
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2011 No Improvement PM Peak
-"
"
Lane Configurations .:to. .:to. ~
~_,*,_'m"'~ "" "~".'..""_
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
;d1C- ,
"1;: "
,,', .~ m'i"llhi.;"W,
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92
~'~'!llI~-'If!
Pedestrians
~1IIIr~"'\'.~ ......"W- II f"""'~~l_~~ ilW
Walking Speed (ftIs)
~lll _BIfilll~ 'j_.!llrr_JII1II1Jlf1lliI7._~"_
Right turn flare (veh)
~i ~="~----~--'~nrfl~"- -'-1~_""'-'\\1I.~1_
Median storage veh)
_~-11111.__"-- ""~l.\1I] 1IIr~ _-_..t~_""'__~
pX, platoon unblocked
-~-~llIr-_
vC 1, st~~_e 1 conf vol
,. ~~ i;
32
525 627 30 546
Volume Left
!iIfIIlIlm '-
cSH
21 180
414 385
"j~mj"h~iR"S__,,__
'S.1~~Af~~
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 65
'. "". ",,' ., ..... "~~~'iIl'I~.'.
Lane LOS A A C C
~lI'i~__7;'
Approach LOS C
"j"T~~__
ITlm1i ,. ",0> ~~ _~~__
'to ~.,,'
"llif1i11i1111l11.
C
Average Delay
1_~UIII~ .. .ill.-1l'IIiI....--ill~~.....
Analysis Period (min) 15
lirMIIIII.1i__lIII'JlIlllI.'1 1]._:!.~__'"~-~1il!f__
WilsonMiller, Inc,
I,:f
Be
250
Ii
'" ml (0; '"
<0 '1 tOj '" .
" '1 " .
E
,
"
>
.
~
.
.
.... '" ;!: U')~ .q-~ N ::1 Nl ., .
'" .,. -, <01 ~ a:
B
c
.
0 .
0
";: ~
u
III
C
.. '" .q-] Nl
U ., .....] ,....!
en
"ti III
0::: ";:
III
III ::!E
'Iii
.. .. " (0; (0;
~ ~ <0 .q-l ~j
a. .
..c: '.
E .- .
'"
III ~ 0 01 0] ~
() E
0 0; 0; .
Ul .... .,. 10_; 0 Ll
.- iE " "
III .... .
0 '" c ~
, ~
"0 N '" 0 ~
u
0::: ',. .
. 0 .
~ E 1:5 0 0: .
, . ~ c
" 'is' iE ,
'" 0>; ",. > a: ~ ~ 0
'" to; to! f- U
6 ci~ ci~ C 0;- '" "- .
0 . '. ',. '" .
E ~ . 0:
c .,. 0 u. E
0 0; 0 0; ~ 1:5 u ~
~ c ,
0 f8j '" ~; ..: . 0 " a.
'" '" . 'e- '" >
~. 0 c . "-
iE 0 a. ~ '"
. N . ~ 0
'" 1:5 , c :r .
c , N E
.,. . " 0 0> ~ ,
.. 0, 0 .
15 ~ 0 ~ ci . "
f- iE 0 " a. >
'" '" . . '" ~ ~
'" '" '" m . u
;o~ ~ ~ .
~ f- f- f- e
~j :J :J .,. 0 0 ~
0 '" '" 15 '" ::: . ;(
'" u. U. f- a. f-
- & ~ ~ € @: to:
;;
.
15
z
....
'"
0> '"
..
...
. It) Pot) N .....
..... It) en .....
'" .,
;! ~
!
-'
!!
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 No Improvement PM Peak
'BG
252
-"
-
,.
..
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Lane Configurations 4-~ ,4- 4-
DiIIPTF~ '," 1l,1.1III&IIIIIIIlII_
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
.," ,
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
~]~~
Pedestrians
-~~I-"'I-_"'--'~--"
Walking Speed (ftIs)
FIJI 1__111 _-IIlI~~ II ~l'lIl--'~"..__r'~-lI._
Right tum flare (veh)
.11'- 1'--. ~--_rr- -1!l ,U!il! ~1lIII\IIIIilJl.~.Jr"~'1l'IllIll_1J
Median storage veh)
- ~.. 1~1IIIIIIlIIIIIII~_J 1- l iiI~,,'.,g.1IIIUI111 1111_
pX, platoon unblocked
~I~~-~I"-
vCl, stage 1 canf vol
__ "~~_.-'lIIIlll!llllllllllllllllJllllllJtilll--'
vCu, unblocked vol 713 105 700 961 104 715 686 437
.I
tC, 2 stage (s)
~--il:'..m:1'11lRlllilll~-'IIli'-'"~'i1_~-.IIlI'-
pO queue free % 93 99 98 83 99 0 100 98
Volume Left 60 12 8 503
_~_liqDIIJ'~~
cSH 887 1486 283 286
.
Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 19 867
7il,ll1ll1'lr~I-""II~"~IIfI1~..
Lane LOS A A C F
~__'~-'_'DllJII_II[nlilllll_~~"IIl_.
Approach LOS C F
Average Delay 146.4
_ llill'1"-'~' -""1Il!llIIIIIm ~._IlJ.w '"~.rm~11~1l!1lII._
Analysis Period (mln) 15
_-......"",r ,--"II,"._lZ"'~_~IiI!_tiilll_2!l!ECI,,:,ml__itl'.s_
~~El~~ "'_ .__ffimf!&ii~J"~1M']~~Jt0ili:ill&~w:!.IiliBI1Mt!1'! "
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Oil Well Rd, at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
'ae
254
-"
- 't
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
200 200
,
200
Storage Length (ft)
200
200 200
200 200
Total Lost Time (s)
~o ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O 4~
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
__.~-'- "-I~j_lli'~.J!~~
0.982 0.999 0.993 0.954
''fl".'--..c,1:7"1I iI._'...mJJ~ "1~1J]"~~ nlllllltl1lllllll~lIl;!l'j
0.600 0.994 0.932 0.690
".r-~~lf.'~~11I ''"I "'11- I ill-,-
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
l.ij_m,_ 11_
2084 2338
"'_~IIi1T~
Volume (vph) 55 95 2 11 148 508 7 37 9 463 0 14
~~~.,.~
Adj. Flow (vph) 60 103 2 12 161 552 8 40 10 503 0 15
~..IL"llll~i__
Turn Type ':erm Perm Perm Perm
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
II '-l_IIIllIIIIIIIIlI~'FlT 1 i ''''
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276
8
2.0
2.0
2
10.0 10.0
"
27.0
21.0 21.0
2.0 2.0
6
Permitted Phases
'.-
10.0 10.0
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0 10.0
10.0 10.0
~"""jF =-'"TI;
Total Split (s)
23.0 23.0
0.0
23.0
23.0
0.0
27.0 27.0 0.0
" , '1ilIi'" " '1Il"~iI!li,'
"Wi, ,. '., ' " '
. ..,.,."' . ."',,,,.'1...
21.0 21.0
tc_!<Im_'~'
.~~
2.0 2.0
, lIIIIIril-'f!l
'-'. .,,' gmLgggsiA'gjj
Maximum Green (s) 17.0 17.0
--....---;
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0
17.0
17.0
Max Max
Max Max
tV
0.87
0.07
A
c
WilsonMiller, Inc.
-
,.
f
-
'-
tt B C
,;."
/!Ii
"
255
t l' \. ~ .;
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd.
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
-"
"
70th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold
MaxR MaxR
MaxR MaxR
I,'i
50th %ile Term Code Hold Hold Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
.... -111I ~.- 11I- _-"'-'11I--
30th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Gap Gap MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
1II1--~-_~-_.----' ~L-~--illl.
10th %i1e Term Code Hold Hold Min Min MaxR MaxR MaxR MaxR
1m . --~~_..~ . lllil ',-- .-,." m""1I--'-'-~'-- lom-
Queue Length 95th (ft) 74 #282 22 #296
!r J.~"'T~!-"--'--~il!J ,,--,.
Tum Bay Length (ft)
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
Storage Cap Reductn
"''*1
"~
o
Cycle Length: 50
~
!:,atural Cycle: 50
U"i{;>"i
-""-"'r-"l._~"-:-
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
.,...--~~_iIIIiIIIIIIIIII
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ' , ICU Level of Service D
~-_~"llIll"'~~'Jlj'rllJillllllll''''''--
9ot';. %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50 '_',,__ ... _, .,~, "
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 50
1IlIIil'-"%~__:'mw,~- ~_lilPlllll!illIl____-1l1 '~~!ti
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 43
fI--~~'""1'~ii""~'flr-Y'i'il~.'-.~-~IIlllJllll
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
~:
3: Oil Well Rd (CR 858) & Camp Keais Rd.
~"
if .a
:1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~i8C
256
Oil Well Rd. at S.R, 29
'Be
257
~
.
m '" '" ~ ~
.; .; '" " 8
w '" M W .
~
~
.
E
v 0 m ~ ~
~ '" ~ 0
'" ~ E
m
<
. ~
..
~ .
<;
~
~ ~ v '" M W m 0 '" .
N N " ;Z 'C N .,; :! 0 m ~
w '" ro M '" :; ro ;; .
<;
. . <
~ :c 0
" i!
0 '.
u > g
. .
c < ~
w . .2 '.
'" ;; w E ~ ~
~ w ro ~ .
0 <;
'" ~ . B
'" m <
< ,g
Ii .~ =g
ui ~ 0
. u
- m ~ " 0 m ~ ro ~ m ~ m <;
.. ~ v w '0 ~
N
,; .
0:: ~
~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ci .; .; .; .; .; .;
is
.
1;
~
\'l m "
18 , c
w 0 0
u .
.
.
i': ~
~
j .
.
~
0 ~ 0
ro ~ " m ~ ro ~ m ~ "
~ v w ..
,
c
c
~
~
0
1;
x
,
~
c
!-
,j
~8C
258
Oil Well Rd, at S,R. 29
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
<J)
N
0::
at-- en ~69
101''- 12
Oil Well Rd (CR 858) ""'./ 5
Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
10 / "'" T
8--1
13 <J) ..-<J)CO
N ("<) t-- ..-
0::
en
'Be
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
259
..J.
-
,.
f
-
'- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Lane Configurations 4. 4> 4. 4.
~---'.F~~-lII
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
" ['
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
~ .
Pedestrians
-... '.--'''If-1IIIIIIII_____~
Walking Speed (ftls)
"" ~~II_'IWll!\1lf1~'%i'"
Right turn flare (veh)
--~"-'-'''':mIII~~'''-III''r!lIIIiIIII.i_'f''
Median storage veh)
ifill -"IllIlIl--'-~ --~--li:l.1IIIIIII "lI.T'.~If~_
pX, platoon unblocked
~rr!lIIm__1IIIII1IIIIIII
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
'. ' ",' ."., "'.1__
103
"""'i0l""
".,~ .~ ;x;
49
,..'.".]\.111._',
Volume Left 11 5 34 18
~--I.I.llln.It$Jtil1'e1lf1"~..___...
cSH 713 875 1558 1489
i:", "'i' ~_.~..lt._~
Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 9 2 1
!>"'-~.., '" ., "," ....-=..~UiiUirlrdfu__1i.__21._?Ik.".."'_"___
~' ~,;g~~~~.~J~~~
Lane LOS B A A A
" ,",' "'g ,. "iIliIlfilllllllll.lf'.~
B
A
Approach LOS
Average Delay
5.0
Analysis Period (min) 15
.~..~...
....\lI,.....
Wilson Miller, Inc.
~~ :
0>
t:
~ ::;
....
0>
..
::!
~ M 0>
M ....
0> M ~j M .....1
0> 0> ~ N;
::; r-i ::! ;;; oni ::; ~ ~~ 0>
O>j N' ....
'8C
260
;:: oi r;;i r-1
on; O'
N ~,
0 ~l aJi 0>[
0> '<1"; ~!
M Ni
0> 01 01 01 0
en 0> ~i 12i 0; ~
N M '<I"J .
.; N'i ~. . "
0:; ~ ,. ,
~ 0
~ '. "
II) 0 0 .
N . .
- g ~ 0 0: .
.. . " re
~ e ~ ,
"ti 0>; 0>1 . ~ 0 .
0> 0); ~ ,. " .
IX: 0 a); o:n a); " . .. " . .
ci o! 0: oj . '. '. "' . .
E ~ 0 . 0:
Gi < .. ~ g
0> < 0 " .
~ 0> ~i al] ~! ::; '" . 0 " ~
;;; . 'e ::; >
on: 0); <q~ 0 < "
(5 .; c.O~ Ni ~ 0 ~ , "'
. N . ~ 0
;0 , r .
0 < , N E
.. . " 0 0> ~ ,
.. " 0 .
>; ci . '0
~ 0 ~ >
,. ~ or ~
"' "' . ~ ~ ti
::; ::; ,. '" . .
,. ,. .. !< ,. " e
.., .., 0 0 ~
"' "' >; "' ::: . ~
~ ~ ,. ~ ,. '"
- € Ei ~ e € to
;;
.
>;
z
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
;r,,' 8 C
262
t ,. \. ~ .I
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29
2011 No Improvement PM Peak
Lane Configurations 4- 4- 4- .4-
~..r~'~I1._~~I1~
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Peak Hour Factor
Pedestrians
iT 11II1111 ___'-~.~ '1_-"-. '1111.11"-,--__.- I~.
Walking Speed (ftIs)
-~:~._Jl.___---lIIIIiIJIIlL-wUIIllIl%-1911, -
Right turn flare (veh)
iII_.~r Im!1IIIIi ,- !1Il1rF-'I1_.:.'" n ~.li"JIIIBInII1IIIIIrlIlI'-~":rlJ
Median storage veh)
I~~""""""ID-"I_I' ". ~---__II ""
pX, platoon unblocked
~~bl_-'"
vCl, stage 1 cant vol
-_Ill'~-~
vCu, unblocked vol 822 746 166 854 788 203 226 222
. - . -
pO queue !ree %.
38
84
88
97
87
91
90
1ift:: 'r""
97
Volume Left 135 5 135 45
_~..r:8"
cSH 317 476 1342 1347
"c_, >"'CW
'4;(
8
3
,~ ",iSY
Average Delay 21.6
__~-~'..,.r~illr"~'~
Analysis Period (min) 15
1I!lIIIIIiIIiI'4I
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29
2011 Additional Improvement PM Peak
-" - ,.
'8C
264
f
-
'- "
t
,. \. ~
.;
0%
0%
0%
0%
Grade
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
~~'4_III..~ __
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ftIs)
- dIIlIIiI1lll m~-<T
Right turn flare (veh)
. ___!Il_",g IlIIl .om
Median storage veh)
lIJi 1_11I111
pX, platoon unblocked
--', w...-. .!m~nl - -.--
vCl, stage 1 conf voi
~--~-~
vCu, unblocked vol 822 746 166 854 788 203 226 222
--- 1IIIIIIIIIIf._llillr "1111 rll_lIIlIliIHlJ]..--~rnr~'minlllllllll ._1.
tC, 2 stage (s)
e;
'10m.
-.
111iI_lmllllllr
11I11 --'.lllr '.'il
- IIW....-IIIIIIIIII...WI
1I'-'I"'-~'~'1:!I.T"_fll1Ilr
-'U ]i 1111.11 1111"-
~I-
-i!'U-- V I
Volume Left
~r "' ;
Lane LOS
135 0 5 135 45
H'''''','
Ilr.~Wi&__._nll'"
E B C A A
, ,m
D C
Approach LOS
Average Delay 11.4
- _ .'--_111I1_1111111111I lIi-
Analysis Period (min) 15
_lIflIi___r--"
1111- .., _ "--."t-"Pfllll1'llIIt.:JII1lIIlI
-'. ~lliI._.'-'___I-1III
WilsonMiller, Inc.
- w
u
~ '" "
<0 'p .~ ~
0; Ii: E
N ~
.s , >
f- a
~ :;;
w
- '" "
u c ~
,!e. 'E E
9 ~
Ii: , >
f- a
:;;
'; '0 " E
c
a , '" ~ W
<0 :r: a ,e E w
0; ~ s, c . ;;
N ro ~ '; > $
. u f- a
0. m :;; w
"' W
'0 e
3 c '"
a , u
<0 :r: a ro .
~ S, a E
'" ~ 5-
N ro ~ ,
. U 0.-
0. ro ",g
"'
<0 ~ N ~
~ '" u
~ ro ro
'" . , ;;: iE
N 0. a ro
:I: ,=
Be
265
<'>
'"
<'>
CQj '" .... '" "'
11)1 <'> "' '"
N
;! ~ ~ ~ ~
~ <'> <'>
'" ~~ ~I '" ~!
0 0
'" C\l[ N
M ... '" mj '" NI ......~ '" .... ~I '"
"' .... "' 'V; ~ ~1 N '"
'"
0
';:
11I
<: I()j a:l~
Gl 0 Mi
U '" co~ ~.
en '" N~ <0-1
11I
';:
11I
en ::E
N
cr: Gl "' ad "', ~!
> ... ~, ",'
<( '" co~ ..-1 ....;
u) .c
- -
11I ~ m
'" o~ oi as N
'ci '" 0' ~j ~j "
'" N en, u ~
II:: 0; co-I ....1 ....j Ie ~
... .. ~
Q ~ c
Gi f- ,
N "" a
3: '. u
. 0 .
ro
0 E " u 0: w
, . Ie ~ C
'" 0); ~j "" " "e- ,
'" <<!1 co; > ~ ~ a
0. U
ci ",' ol 0' c f-
.. "" 0. .
. <n
E '. '. .
~ . 0:
0 ~j o. ~j c .. 0 u. E
'" " U 0;
... "', '. c ,
'" 0: ~i '" '" . 0 " 0.
ci 6j ....j c-.i1 u . "e- " > 0.
~. Ie c 0. 5
a '0 <n
~ N w a
, c :r: .
f- " C , N E
.. . " e '" ~ ,
.. '" ro
~ '" ci . !i
~ u ~
; Ie u " 0.
i ; <n <n . ro l< ~ '"
F:d; '. " " '" '" ~ u
:15 00, 6i ~ .
(0, N; 0: f- f- .. f- a
,0) ~! (0), to, :J :J 0 a "-
l"~ 0' T-f "' "' " "' :Ii ~ ~
~I .C\I.~ u. u. f- 0. '"
~ ~ C ~ € € to:
I "
.
"
z
'" ",. <",j (OJ
\!! 0; ~j
N' MJ
~
"'
H
Be
266
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29
2016 No Improvement PM Peak
0)
N
NO) a::::
N.q-("<) en Hg
("<)lco
7
Oil Well Rd (CR 858) ""'/ Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
/~
306--i T
56
236 1O("<).q-
0) co co I'-
N ("<)("<)
a::::
en
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29 ~8C 267
2016 No Improvement PM Peak
-" - ,. f - '- " t ,. \. ~ .;
Pedestrians
,~
Walking Speed (ftIs)
--~lll1Ir~~"''''f!-Sl.IT_~~~
Right turn flare (veh)
~lilllllllllililllf-~"&~_."'~I~;~..x~r_i_1'.l""-~B
Median storage veh)
~ - ,._-- ____IIfIIi-m-
pX, platoon unblocked
__---~lj..w~=-w~--"'~_'~!ii;."WIi.-.1lI
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
~Ii~~
vCu, unblocked vol 1838 1742 337 1989 1877 435 512 475
~"c." _
tC, 2 stage (s)
,,~ "f
1'-;;;
,
'110\-; it<'
'&
"- '~if'~"5-*lfd!t.\' '-illS,,"T" "
tt
pO q~~,~e free %
o
o
64
o
o
83
94
Volume Left 333 8 397 68
~f 1 "'~m ,n~"'2_ H_'~_'__Jtl~f@J~l'wJ~~_~}_
cSH 0 0 1053 1087
_l'iW-'_I/'-_nt!l'll"_1B"'!~i10SiJj__illf!_2'i7"""'S''''''0''''''''''""'&iiil!"__ITlhilUi
1B'&~~~~~~;3~t~1ijl\{'~~~ft1T~ilii~~~
Queue Length 95th (ft) Err Err 44 5
,--~. ...... --~---._~~ii~jJj~_~.~~.r~I~Ji~IJr~.
Lane LOS F F A A
Approach LOS
F
'~___~iC.,ai\'_i"""~i7_""""hillf7;jjjjillliht_.,,_,
-"'-. _.i~~~~~~r~GWif~jl~~
F
Average Delay Err
liillll~_~"IIII"ilIIi
Analysis Period (min) 15
.- __ill_"___"'it.,l'_,....,lij_.~'_Uiiili......,"+" ""',W"',""w
51"- WK.~~_~:--'.~ ~,"l;:l,;F"
WilsonMiller, Inc.
J' Be
268
Oil Well Rd. at S,R. 29
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
Ol
N
NOl a:
N.q-("<) C/) H~
:Ctt
7
Oil Well Rd (CR 858) "--., ~/ Oil Well Rd (CR 858)
7 r::::
306~ 1if
56~ 1O("<).q-
236 Ol co co I'-
N ("<)("<)
a:
C/)
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29 -8 C 269
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
-" ,. f - '- " t ,. \. ~ "
-
Lane Configurations
Ir~'
, Wi'};
,._._. 1
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
'1 _ 0~_~11~;_1.!t;
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UlllIIllI tIlt..-._i~-_"'"J"'~'lmlIl~If!_8i_
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95
_Un - -."...,, ~1IIiIIiI:JIIIII~l!lKIIIl.JIlIlIlIIIJ!l._
Fit Protected 0.950 0.998 0.950 0.950
~'li_.dmf'i" lI]I1Il!_~-j"'-..t'lIill6'I"''''~''.'j---d;''lIni~..~'$'''.
Fit Permitted 0.632 0.981 0.337 0.438
.. rlilllr--.fRi-IlI~1 ~ -..~m!l1_
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~-"--'''''''-~_----.ell~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
- nh-~;:-- ~- *-?YF--- -"'---__m~__
2684 2276 2084 2338
-'ft:'~-:'7' _.c;~- - ---::'fU8J~~"
Volume (vph) 306 56 236 7 59 95 365 363 74~' 63 14i:1 322
.......-~.----~-~~.If.
~dj. Flow (vph) 333 61 257 8 64 103, 397 395 8~,~~
Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt
-~~~Ul~f~Iii_jirj"'..~irlElll
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
_." ~-- i~p~4-::im_J~liIr.!_~"_1ft
Minimum Initial (s) 10,0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
, '.' , . = ,','" ".~ y'" ""[_i[
Total ,Split (s) 26.0 26.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 16.0 24.5 0.0 14.5 23.0 0.0
'r'"" "," '~~~~~
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 11.5 18.5 10.0 17.0
pr"-'~"""jllll ~U!_W-~~I:fiJllllllf~"~Iw:JJflI...
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
"7" * '/' T, .,..umm~
Yes Yes Yes Yes
.~=. ,~, ',.'..,',. .'-
Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max
~~'.'l!_.II.~rIlllDlllll'V_liil_
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_'ii<<lI"l.J~/' .'" , ,...."IiIII_.iAilllll1U"I1I1Il!llIIIiIII
Act Effct Green (s) 20.9 20.9 20.9 33.5 26.4 29,7 19.0
lIiJ.J' R_ill.IIl.~-__... :lB_l'l"!iI!IIirlIBlllltillllllll
v/c Ratio 0.86 0.45 0.28 0.73 0.33 0,14 0.43
-_'IIiIll'i!l1i1'.- _.&1"""'","'!I "!lIilID~~---'""-I-mi!j~~_ll!rlll!_!i:ill~"'j~l\oi:i2i~
~~~i____~__ _~M!ft4miliRi-~~@( _a_~m~ ~!il!IillI-""-_~,f",___dl~\f);;C!1L!\!?1!!'J@&Vniw!!:L~i
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
"''''-~--'';_''''''"'~r1i'__r"'':'''Hl1ldN.jif_a!!!I_-iliii''''''''''_,Al_."r.."""~"'lf;..'....0"".."'..ii!il>illh'...rli_'~..'i!i.~
\!~~~m,~l.~.. m :~~~~%t~fffi-.Sl~~~5tj~MHft!~'IjimIim~lUilt0:Ji~t%li~~~~~~Atjfu~j
LOS D A A B B A A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
Oil Well Rd. at S.R. 29
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
270
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
C
A
Approach LOS
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR
-, III m W-"-'--llI!IIlIlI~-.....IIIItUi.._rA'!tUI'-YII ~ III
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR
50th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR
11III. . Ii" lill ---=-~IIl.r--~ 1'llD1.lI:lIt1I1llIIrr IIII~ _ll I
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max Hold Skip MaxR
"....
10th %i1e Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Gap Hold Skip MaxR
__ 'JJD'" '~T-~-~-._~""'""'I~__[~"~l!I~~ill "111 ""
Queue Length 95th (ft) #255 67 58 #176 108 28 59
-Br-'.."-"'-III]v _llliIIllllllllr""lJ -
200 200 200
",.. !IIlIImIiIUllII r la_liffl II mmirn
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'~_I_.i!IIIl_~1! II
o 0 0 0
'~--
c:;ycle Length: 65
Natural Cycle: {)5
'''' ......~~ '/L"'!!II!l"fif' "'~~
..0..~ W~
. ' ...."=li!_:"~2!!lV"VZi"-_Ui_2!'j&l.Uil.'."'_._ill__~"-~-.-~-IlIl.
__lll'a.____:ilIlll__II_
I
'V
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86
w'j" :>tct'Y' .. "i' ....m.;c<;
!iI W ,'.
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D
_ ,~iI<_Ik.~"--I!l--azi0!l'jj'"
I. , ......... "* lm~ltattgjJnLJlliI~dL*
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
.'~i'i
" -111I_11I Ill.
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
~. ";1"
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 59.6
J i-n_llI.r__~__III~~_I[[IIIIl.1
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
f':"' '"~~:!':.' R' (CR '"'' 'R" ~...
.", .~ IE: "~.. ::-"t..
WilsonMiller, Inc.
CIl
U
c:
..
~
-
c:
W
..
."
..
::;
CIl
>
<(
-
..
"
0::
.,
'OJ
CIl
:.::
c.
E
..
u
~~
co1 ~
~
~!
~
~
.1
'j
&; ~l
w
~
......1
Nl
<<11
'i
'.
iN!,
,
co;
o:o!
C'\Ij
r--!
M'
'f
0,
c,
(")1
~j
i ~]
;
OIl
<<!l
0:
~~
0'
~[
OJ
'ac
..
oj
0 ~
"
" .Q
>- ~
~
..
0 u
. n .
E 0 ~
0 . "
" e . "
> <L >- '"
'E . ~ .
. '. '. .
E ~ 0 ~ E
c .. g 0
~ :;: n "
~ '.. " >
. 0 ~
~ c 0: ;,
0 . c I
. N N
0 0 ~
>- n c e ~
. ., 0 .
.. ~ .
" .. 0 j\ .. <L
@. ~
>- ~ . ~ .
'" '" m ~ ~
" " >- ..
5 >- .. 0 0
or> :l .
" ~ >-
'" '" >-
~ ~ ~ 0: @:
€ M
-
~
"
z
272
<D
z
'"
~
to.
w
N
W
~
,g
.
00
'E
o
o
U
~
c
o
o
U
..
~
>
w
or>
~
.
..
.
~
~
E
.
o
! I
~ "
; ,
, I
I,!
,',
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2011 No Improvement PM Peak
-"~" t~
Be
274
./
Peak Hour Factor
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ftIs)
III 1II~:f-ol" 11I---'-- IP"'WII.--~{iJllII,=~mlll__
Right tum flare (veh) 8
I 1-.. '_I'IIIIIlIlB~-~r-l1l1111.-'-lIl.-~~IIIlI"""""
Median storage veh)
-~~"..
pX, platoon unblocked
- "'~llnlll---""'~~JI.... 1~1II
vCl, stage 1 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
731 323 638
tC, 2 stage (s)
,
if,{ *"".
cSH
.""'t-.,
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1397
19
o
Average Delay 255.6
IlID"-II-K~BIIH~_.
Analysis Period (min) , 15
IIIIIIII
Wilson Miller, Inc.
'BC
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance 276
2011 Additional Improvement PM Peak
y. ~ " t l .;
Lane Configurations , "
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
II -__.[~~ [IIL_lIlEII
Fit Protected 0.950 0.957
- _.-~~,,--- 1IJIIp;[ ]11" '~'- -I -
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.261
- .~-_di: JI---IJi
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes
~-- ~-i-
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
"11II1-
1-
J 11IIIII
Link Distance (ft)
2684
2084 2338
"
Volume (vph) 541 166 177 21 8 579
Ii""W"w",~_~--~-~-'~-~
Adj. Flow (vph) 588 180 192 23 9 629
Tum Type custom Perm
Permitted Phases 4 4 2
~-- .illl:ll r?l_.lIBiIIIBEIIIIIIIIllillIl; II:OO_~_.. _1J-.llII!R:
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
,. ' - .
Total Split (s)
26.0 26.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 0.0
L ,
Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 28.0 28.0 28.0
....... "1IDIIIIIIIi__1lIIII JI;:lL.~ ,,;a---~:
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
'__r-r-I..~L liB
Lead-Lag Optimize? .
~.:I!i_
11.0 11.0 11.0
Act Effct Green (s) 21.8 21.8 30.0 30.0
r-- [~.~.fl_lIIlIIIllJl[]J"'_"'_lf1IIIIilII'.
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.26 0,88 0.57
n ~~~.III__-.llIi -"I~l;~".__
Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0
iiIII ._._"-m8il"_W__J!>l__W_"';jj~_d'" ,
~ ,'. G,,~j!ift)~'I~;__~.5!m~1fi*rniXl~mmgG ~. . . "," ",Pkl1fut Js~N
WS DAD A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Camp Keais Rd, at Ave Maria Entrance
2011 Additional Improvement PM Peak
'8C
277
-"
...
"
t
~
.;
70th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
.
50th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
46
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
~~~-
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0.0
'4_~n
Cycle Length: 60
1111 ~'Ili3lII---~U:lIIl--.'.'~-I~'~" If-'--~ -- "
Natural Cycle: 60
_'ii """"-r--ll'lllmr-.fuj~"-E-_r'JQ"----'~-
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
~~-_iE_-'~_.ilI~
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service E
, ,
90th 'Ioile Actuated Cycle: 60
--_OCIllIIll:II_II'~
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60
----~II~I---~'_"~~~"._-"___.
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 59.1
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3 Ave Mana Entrance & Camp Keals Rd
~: .. ~.
~
Wilson Miller, Inc.
1;; ~
w .~ c:
'" '0' w
;; Ii: E
~ W
N =: " >
l- e
~ '"
~
1;; ~ c
0
,~ E
e :; w
Ii: >
l- e
'"
, '" E
:: ~ ~
..,
'"
..
....
..,
:; g
., ....
'"
'"
..
l!"'"
8e
278
.... ::
'"
0 m
'i:
01 z
e '"
Gl Gl .... :: ....
u u '" to-
e en '"
N
E '"
01 c
- 'i: e
e 01 ~
W ::E ;;;
01 E
'i: Gl '" (0; "
e
01 ~ .. <o;t! u
c
::E '" w
c
.c , "
Gl - e "
~ 3: u <(
'" oi .. ~
'" ~~ 0 .
- CD '" 0. ~
01 " 0 .
.... e '"
-ci 0 I- .. 0
.... "" c E
0:: 0 .
'. n "
en w 0 ~
'OJ E U 0 '6
, w :;;
Gl C':l1 :g 'e' "
'" '" '" ~ 0-
:.::: ., co: ., ., ll. l-
e 0: e e E .. "" 0.
Q. w . "'
E ~ '. w
E c .. 0 u. E
'" oi ~ u
01 ~ c U ,
'" 1'-, <( W 0 "
0 '" LOf W e' '" >
0 c
" Il ll. '" 5
. 0 c e
;or U , , N I
c
~ W " e m ~
.. ~ 0 .
~ 0 ~ ci W
I- " 0 " ll.
"' "' . . '" ~
:j '" '" ;or m .
i~l l- I- ~ b i:
::> ::> ;;; e
01 "' "' e "' :f .
"" u. U. l- ll. I-
- ~ ~ ~ € €
;;
J!l
e
Z
!
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 No Improvement PM Peak
Be
280
-" .... "
t + .;
Grade 0% 0% 0%
III .~~~IQIIRIft__Ilf~
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
'8
Pedestrians
III ~-""""---..III!I(-'~~-I~.I."'-III
Walking Speed (ftIs)
.iIIIJ~--___.IIIIIIIIIIIIIII"mlj':l'_._IJ ...
Right turn flare (veh) 8
. IllirlM-..nll1lill..'''''''..UIJIIB_1JIIIII"- if 'T"-lJlr4m- '---I -
Median storage veh)
- "'-wi1"'~Ili[.r.flli(_.----I''l.- - -r~ '--'.11
pX, platoon unblocked
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
..' '1Il11rrl'~n ".. _'- 1----'.
1579 469 926
".' ' .~._____IiI[--',J 111I11II1_.
m~_lIlr't1_-_.il. -81 "rn"
o 15 27
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, 2 stage (s)
~l_~i.
pO queue free %
Volume Left 859 536 0
N.. ""~__-"-'II___IIi1~
cSH 51 738 1700
_l.r-w'~I_JidIllllI___._ JIII.-:!'....". "M ..
Queue Length 95th (ft) Err 159 0
L',..IIIIIlIIIr"lll..!IIIBIlI_.r__-.~..'TI.1J__11IIIIr
Lane LOS F C
1r--l__JJIIli:1-t_~"'I&":JI.Wlf"_~~v"lfrT JII&~.lllli
Approach LOS F
Average Delay 4762.6
II IIlIl'llllm ""~_n~-~--~-~~ ,lTID..III.
Analysis Period (min) 15
~' '_ i'_AfIIlll"-'. "" ....~1IIIJl
WilsonMiiler, Inc,
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
~~I"':"'MIIIifIIBI
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
IilIII -_".~~~"IIIIiL_!ff".IIf~__fli ..
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
]:;7 IIlIIlllfll"Ir---~_!Jlli!Dll-oo-~-I~I!.II!:r~~r'-
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.167
lIiI _ -~"'-lm'liD___llr--~~1111 I--:.:.L
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes
----------ij
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~_~---aIIII.
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2084 2338
, .""L.....___lIIlIlIIIIIIIIIi" ~ -_
Volume (vph) , 790 463 493 35 11 841
Minimum Initial (s)
--
Total Split (s)
:I:tll : Tn~E__illm:in,1!'~IlJ.
,__I_.:BIUllIIIIIII
Act Effct Green (s) 18.0
v/c Ratio
0.90 0.63
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance
2016 Additional Improvement PM Peak
8e
283
-" .. "
t ~
.;
MaxR
MaxR
30th %ile Term Code Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
~I__ ["_"~'0.~].lI>'tl_ll J-~~.
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max MaxR MaxR
I!lIlI jj..........~"~r..-I~~"'%".II.I
Queue Length 95th (ft) #271 64 #357 15 #395
II -". """~-"'" "!i~~
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200
-----.11
. - ~'\'i:IIIIll ifill]
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o 0
l\Jatural Cycle: 65
'{'''i'Xii "~'!0t;hi;;:':; ,j:;;"~__~~,/.T"\!""'-*'
.""""',,"*
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02
f""* ,,~N . """"'.'~ N',''''' ";("'0',.,/. ;"',;'iff*",""j;; ',,'/~P; "W""'l' . it' " 'b'''~'
i;:'terseclion Capacity Utilization 112.5% ICU Level of Service H
~;__.Il.lallmlllllllr' -, "r
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 65
~~.~ij_~l-"'IE"'rlr~
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
~~i..~'_ii,r~;!I!\I"'B'~.I'_I_-IIIIl1l"iIIllI1
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 65
!lr!~r.~_~""~III~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles_
Il~ ~i1lIji~IMIIi~'''._~~W'&'SlW'~'!mw'''''.-'''iII
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
'1IIIIliIiIIIIII
3: Ave Maria Entrance & Camp Keais Rd.
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
" Be
I"~
284
1tf!'sc
t"
285
,;
m '" .. -1'
,
'" '" '" ci 0
.. M '" ~ 0
.
.
.
!!l
c
.
E
'" 0 0 .
'" >
.. '" '" m 0
~ N ~ M E
N m
"'
" E
. "
~ .
. r5
e ~
M ~ '" '" '" .. .. N M .
'" ci <ri ci ci ;! <ri ,.: m ~
'" '" .,; .
'" '" ~ N '" .E r5
. . c
C " 0
, " 0
0 '. "
U > ~
" . .
0:: c c '"
0 .. m ~ . .2 '.
.<:: N :li m ~ E " ~
m ~ N . " .
" > C r5
0
.. " . , B
.. m c 0
m c 0 0 ~
E ~ g
<;
:!:: , c c '"
:0 0- 0 . Q.
'" N '" M M m . U ~ l'
~ '" N .. N ;! '" M ~ 0 ~ '" r5 'm .
.. ~ N ~ '" ~ .. .. c . 1; oc
" 0 " . ~
. ::>
c: " x ~ .
.. 0 !" ~ ~
> m
-
..
,; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci
iii
~
.!!!
"0
()
"
~
.
'" N '" M M M 0 m '" e
N .. "
'" N N ;! '" ~ ~ .. ~ ..
~ ~ '" ..
,
c
c
"
~
S
.
'i:
'5
..
.
Q
- .
.0:
,~
~~
" 0
Ci
c
0.0
:g 3: Q>
"'- 0_
, 0
-::=C)a:::
5 0
o~
U
..
o
<>
N
;; ~
o Ole
:I: C .
: 'c E
~ , .
o , >
.0- 0
p- 2
..
<>
<>
N
C
- ~
, -
0- C
3 1;
'U
0:
-
"
.
E
.
>
o
:;
~ ~ a::: ~ ~ a::: ~ ~ a::: ~ ~ a:::
m m 00 m m m m m m m 00 00
z z z w ~ ~ w w w ~ ~ ~
!
.
I
;
!
II
Jat
286
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
~
..-
1O
en
0:::
()
'-'
"'C
>
co
....
Q)
0
CON ()
.q-N.q- 48
Jl( ~189
40
Vanderbilt Beach Rd, ~~./ Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
/ ~
563~ 1f
73~ .q-1O..-
163 ~ .q-lON
..- ..- r--
1O
en
0:::
()
'-'
"'C
>
co
....
Q)
0
()
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
'8e
287
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Lane Configurations 'f>.
,.
Storage Length (ft) 200
.. .
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0
0 0
.f; 'i ''fo. 'I t .".
" ....+~~'lllIFt~~a'Zg~!lIII~
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
--,-__, ""..l'UiIX=tiIiflilf "',',' ._~,',r'''_.'fi,:Tlc'._' ..,',,"
~~_~lliIi 0:.'. "'^'"... ._it@'~itt%~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.993 0.950 0.950
'k- L_--~-_If!!ll!l_._~r" _.--'~_'if~
Fit Permitted 0.517 0.921 0.073 0.074
!lilt!. -'"~~---'r-I~"!i'-"-"~""~._"Ill~i1I-~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~~[Ar-'''~'~DI.--.7Fi~1II
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
fiT W% j 1m '" '.' ");sy j__ ~
2084
2338
Link Distance (ft)
2684
2276
- ":>""<filii"""'" ;F6f!An~
__ 'S" _~hM -
Volume (vph) 563 73 163 40 189 48 144 755 21 24 722 148
...........,~p~~~..ij:j;-illlIIl..IIIlI~i\!ll'~'lI
Adj. Flow (vph) 612 79 177 43 205 52 157 821 23 26 785 161
i1f'~ ~ ,
Perm
Perm
pm+pt
Permitted Phases
4
_*_":?:I,t
2
Minimum Initial (s)
1_,,,'" '
~'
Total Split (s)
~f[~~:;;f"'; 'f"--
10.0 10.0
",'__'",,' '",'w
,-'J--
, f""~ "")"W. ')::,%~___
77.0 77.0 0.0
w:" -
Maximum Green (s)
"
71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0
.;~_._~
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
'''~i
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
~!RllI'-' 1'11f1lll.1lli1 ,..
Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max Max
."".'IIF'.. ~~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
".. '.. .. '~""I3Jlrmrm[4'''iI$HlliBil'''11r!!ik1j_1&ili1_''''''~'", "..Fr'....,".. "....." "
, - ~~~rnflai~~:"M....fJ.w,z.r_,
Act Effct Green (s) 73.0 73.0 73.0 66.9 60.3 64.6 54.0 54.0
-'-IIIl,!,_4Jl4"-~"1Ua~."1il~fuvtil1lM'1h""'_-JL~gLm"'B'1~~_
~"""""~ - ___.w__ -'"k*-,g,'@~_"w!i~f!rt~~~kw.~_ _ _ 0~
v/c Ratio 1.30 0.30 0.37 0.87 1.13 0.15 1.17 0.26
-~-"*""'J<ilit'W:)"'~i!i.lill_,,g"""'.m"'''UiIli)jj_UiW',"_~11ll_~''r'MIi'ntll!i1*,_''''
~~~~~.~t€*$H;rli1t*S]l!r!f1WJ1~~~AUi~E;: "..f*Hry1illI~~~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
lil-'_~-~~.'i&"'''t_KQf'P'X''ltl.w''~''',.". ~_'iI"~'''_''''i'''_s'''.1"~'''''''~I~ral.t_~
~~~+~fillnTI~0~~r~~;~ij~~Im;;mHj!g~~~~g~i!l1"~~~"",~~~
LOS F B C E F C F C
10.5
52.5
, .w;'
"1'"
All-Red Time (s)
1.0
2.0
Yes
Yes
Yes
WilsonMiller, Inc,
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
Be
288
-"
-
,.
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Hold Hold
Max MaxR
Max MaxR MaxR
70th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Hold Hold
Max MaxR
Max MaxR MaxR
50th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Hold Hold
Max Max
Hold Hold
30th %ile Term Code
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max Hold Skip MaxR MaxR
.
Queue Length 95th (ft) #1005 145 249 #239 #1291 32 #1166 120
Cycle Length: 150
iii ~~l'rf4ll!lfIll_",w7J.l
Natural Cycle: 1,;;0
__I_IIIIIIIIIIII
III 'II:-~II!IIIIII_.
j.1 __1lIIll@"'.-__
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.30
Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.9%
ICU Level of Service G
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
....................
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
~----11111.~~
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
t~:
3: Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
3::
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
u .
e '" "
'0 c e
~ 0: E
0 c e
N E 0 >
f- a
~ :.
u g' ~
"
"- "E E
a .
0: 0 >
f- a
:.
" " EO.
c
a 0 '" " "-
r 0 "E c e
0 ~ 0, " <i
N . ~ " > E
. u f- a ~
a. 0 :.
'" w
" S '" <e
u
r " 0 u
0 ~ 0, E E
N 0 ~ 0. 0
0 u :g
a. 0
'"
~ N '9:
~
~ 0 " 0 ~
0 . '"
N Q. a 0
r .=
'aG
289
., .. .. C> .. C> N! ., 0 Ni N
'" N N ~ .. .. C>' 0 .. co, ~
0, C> N ~ N N'
~
,
L
'" 00; <0 a; ~
" H ~
; " Ci
.
"
.
c
0
.
.
.
N <0 " ii N " Ni ., oi N' N or
., N N :: 0 all 0 <OJ '" ~ e
'" ~ N N' 0
.
c
w
B .
c .
. E
.
0 0
~i 10; ",. '" '0
W U >
Vi ~1 -,
~i "tj
~ -, <r-!
'" C;;1 oi O)j
-.:i N -, (0;
'" ~j ~1 101
II: oi N; -'
.r:
<.l 0; oj 0:
CO 0
.. 0 0; ~1 ~1
'" ~j
III .". 0;); ,....-[ /.D-' 0
N Ni .....1 " ~
~ ~ c
f- 0
:a '" a
U
.. '. .
.. . 0 . .
"t> E tl or . m
>
s::: 0 . 0 . " .
'" en! ~j en; '0 "e " 0
CO " CO! lX:!1 > ~ 0 0
> a. u ~
ci cij 0 OJ " f- 0. m
- . .. '" oo .
CO E '. . .
~ . or
c 0; 0 ~ E .
-.:i 0 oj oi 0; rn c tl U 0
> '" ..' ,," 0' :ji <( . 0 '0 Q.
'" .....) CL"!.1 Ni 0 . "E " >
iii oi Ni 0); ,....-i C 0.
N (")1 -' " 0 Q. " 0 oo
.. . N . c a .
f- tl " 12 N r ~
.!!! 0; . " rn ~
15 .. ~ 0 . "
0 ~ 0 " . >
f- " 0 or a.
oo oo . " ~ L
U ~ m . 0
" " f- ~ f- " .
f- f- e
:J :J .. 0 0 0
oo oo 0 oo :/ . 0
~ ~ f- a. f- <(
- ii: " " € € E
;;
.
15
z
!
!
"'
I'
"'
fi8G
290
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
.........
..-
1O
0)
0::
()
........-
"'C
>
co
....
Q)
0
coO) ()
.q-..-CO ~2
J!( 82
60
Vanderbilt Beach Rd, ~ / Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
/ -............
789-y If
92~ NlOCO
CO("<)N
205 ......... ..- 0
..- ..-
1O
0)
0::
()
........-
"'C
>
co
....
,!E
0
()
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'8e
291
-"
-
,.
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
~_~_Y-~~w...l.oi__n~~
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
.. ,. ,"r;
. ...
.. ..
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
r~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~11II__1l~_
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
-'~'~lliI:lIIP-~~g
Fit Protected 0.950 0.993 0.950 0.950
-~r-~_'.nr.m'~''lI!lIllll''-''-~ "':::m'illllilf""-""-~
Fit Permitted 0.433 0.888 0.079 0.080
II..JIIIII...-__-..'lIJr-"'-~~.~IIIIIIIIf"~~.
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~1IUii-"'~~-~-.-'~::.lIlIr"'''1IIB._..l....._
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~'ilIlDIIIIIIi.~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
'" ,.", '" "" "_!till_
789 92 205 60 282 72 182 1035 26 28 919 248
- .1 1
100 223 198 1125 30 999 270
Turn Type
Perm
Perm
" pm+pt
pm+pt Perm
'" ]II_~
6 6
..",. ,"~ ,"J~_!!
10.0 16.0 16.0
t~~1!
81.0 81.0 0.0 15.0 54.5 0.0 14.5 54.0 54.0
,..",....,. W"" " '_
Maximum Gree~ (s) 75,0 75.0 75.0 75.0 10.5 48.5 10.0 48.0 48.0
.~U-_'''''''-~''~Ii!I-'''-''~
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
liir '." . ,.'. .. 1.~1
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
-~P'-""'~__1f~1l{lIl
Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max Max
r-' '1" ,,__
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
_r....._'"'~lfJl!j!M~--'II!44&,,;-'__"'y"'1.~_",LIXSl_&1ill"._n
~l0Jffr~g!W~mllU~~~~~_~~_1if~~~~,.j~
Act Effct Green (s) 77.0 77.0 77.0 62.9 56.3 60.6 50.0 50.0
~lIIflml~~-~.rllllllllillllli_.rT~~
v/c Ratio 2.07 0.35 0.54 1.09 1.65 0.18 1.61 0.46
_=lllili:lliIlIIIi[' " ' . 'rr ' '__"Xi'I.'"
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
----~~JllIlllllll!llllil'i!......!~_~~!Ii.l~.a1ll
LOS F B C F F C F C
Permitted Phases
..-.., If
4
""",. }t ."" ');""
2
10.0
10.0
, =
10.0
10.0
10.0
16.0
WiisonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
Be
292
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Approach LOS F C F F
III111111111111
90th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
, 0'
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max MaxR MaxR MaxR
- ,
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max Hold Hold Max Hold MaxR
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Hold Skip MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #1184 187 390 #337 #1988 38 #1660 227
Cycle Length: 150
l' . -"'s""lll!!f"--~'~~~~~~~~~~'~~m!!fII.~-MIIlIl.IIITI1J["_.Em
Natural Cycle: 150
1II111!.r'--~_~'-.I~lIiT__1IIIIIIIIlIIIII
Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.07
1- ---
Intersection Capacity Utilization 144.0% ICU Level of Service H
~1IIIrSl=t"'._llIlrnillll:i8lwTIr' -,~
90th %lle Actuated Cycle: 150
, '.---
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 150
fl":-:
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
I\"r~
" 05 i...,. 06
3: Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
I:
~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
..) -l- f- '-
'8 {",
,
t.. 294
" t ,. \. ~ .;
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00
~ __" ~!%lli!ll_
0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
I r"-~L"'.."'--- ~-~
0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
_._______n-~.-'Il~
Yes Yes Yes Yes
1I1~1~,'-------"-- Il---~
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dllrrr~
2684 2276 2084 2338
Volume (vph) 789 92 205 60 282 72 182 1035 26 28 919 248
~- Bllir....,.,...j....-...._.lIIlliiillli'__.,..,_
Adj. Flow (vph) 858 100 223 65 307 78 198 1125 28 30 999 .27~
" 0:im
"" * . ~ -, '.,.,'$,~
Free Pmt Free Pmt Free
"I_~-
Free Free Free
-!lm'-"-";11~"
~ L.~2ti!1M~~~i*dlliVf~~
10.0 16.0 7.0 10,0
. ,'" 1fIII1ll
0.0 15.0 25.5 0.0 14.5 25.0 0.0
.,='..
23.5 29.5 10.0 16.0 10.5 19.5 10.0 19.0
'~.JI...J>!-IIIIlIIIlTT.IJ_.~_
1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
Prot
Free
Pmt
Permitted Phases
Free
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0
16.0
7.0
28.0
35.5
0.0
14.5
Maximum Green (s)
f. lllil~iili If
All-Red Time (s)
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None None
None None
,
None Max
None
15"
Flash Dont Walk (s)
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
"*',-
Act Effct Green (s) 23.8 31.1 84.5 8.0 12.9 84.5 10.7 31.2 84.5 7.6 21:0 84.5
~~I!l'Illl~v -'-Tl JJI!IIIIIIl'Ill!1 ....~T'ni!!l_t.lImillll_
v/c Ratio 0.89 0.08 0.14 0.21 0.39 0.05 0.45 0.60 0.02 0.11 0.79 0,17
__ _!Ill,; _ -.....- --- 1IT:'III_~.-!..IJl~1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
--..,...!il--._!lP___-_IiC..@~Ii>.II!l!ji"1
f'~~ . .';i''''e$j'0.~~~~Ar,~~:ill.I!2~~~
WS DBA DCA DCA D D A
WilsonMiller, Inc,
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
2011 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
~8L
295
-"
-
't
f
-
'-
"
t
~
\.
~
..I
Max Hold
70th %ile Tenn Code Max Hold Gap Gap Max Hold Min MaxR
10th %ile Tenn Code Gap Hold Skip Min Min Hold Skip MaxR
.
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~...~~
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
.,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~ ;;; "' :2! .. f!~ fQ; ~ ;1; ... ...
.... ;;; N; .. C> ...
.....; ~l ....i '" ....
.....1 .....1
,.
~
e
01 <<Ii CJ
.. N .
:: -, 0 0; :0
-, ....j ~
c
0
.
.
.
0:
~
,
l,(')! co! .
<0 ;;; on <0 -, ~ ~i .... ... c
~, '"' IJ"); N ~I N' '" 0, ... w
0' .....1 N Ml .9
" .
.....j c .
. E
. ,
0 0
~ :g
'i: u
..
C (0; :!
CIl N ...'
... ~1 r--.;
'tI U "'. Mj
lr: en .....! .....i
.s:: ..
u 'i:
.. ..
CIl ==
III CIl ;;; (<)1 CX)! l,(')!
::: > 0; 0; ("');
... M; ("1.1 (O!
:is <( N C':il Nj
.. .s::
CIl - 0:
'tI ~ m
oj 01 01 >
C 0 "
.. 0 0; 0' 0;
<D '" au ql ~! u ;;;
> ... oi ~! ~l CD! " . ~
N e E
- 0 I- ,
.. N ",. 0
U
,; '. ~
. <>
~ E " u 0: .
III , . " 0; E
O>! :g 'e- ,
'" OJ; 0); . ~ 0
.. '" co; 0:); co; 0- '" u
,!!! 6 oj 01 01 c .. ",. 1i .
. '. .. "' .
E ~ . 0:
'0 c .. <> u. E
0 0; ~1 0; ~ c " '-' , 0;
(,) '" -' :i:j ~ '" . 0 " 0-
on M; ~j . e- '" >
ri 0: (0; ""1 u c 1i
'"' '<tj Nj " 0 0- " "'
. N . " 0
'" c .
" , , N I E
c
.. . " e ~ ~ ,
~ .. ~ '" ~ "
~ u ~ .; . >
" u " 0-
"' "' . '" ~ ~
. al ~ u
(~'! '" '" '" \i .
l- I- b e
::> ::> ~ 0 ~
~j "' "' "' ~ ~ :t
u. u. I- 0-
":j - i'l € ~ € € E
in
.
15
z
"'
-
'"
N
~o;:
;s: 5>;s:
N~(/.)
.0-
CO
~
;>. ti.~ ro
:;: .~tt::?:: N
ro 0 nl 0 _
CJ a:.= 3:
I-
<0
~
o
N
>.~ >- -
l'tl ~ c: ro u ~
s:o..~~:::a;
0- l'tl <l.l rc '-
3: ~ c:J G> ~"C
l-~U)S: 5
'"
ct C
~ .
'" E
Be
296
..
.Ii
~ l- ~ ~ l- ~ ~ l- ~ ~ l- ~
m m 00 m m w m m m 00 m 00
z z z w U) U) ~ w w ~ ~ ~
~
Be
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
298
-"
- l-
f
-
"- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
o
o
o
o
1.00 1.00 1.00
-.....m
0.950
1.00
lr""-
1.00 1.00
~.-
0.404 0.734 0.073 0.074
......lilJIIlI_ "'''"IlIIII~ I II......' ,~ r'.'!UII
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
.I~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
r __~---.....~~
Volume (vph) 1079 126 281 64 304 77 215 1244 31 35 1165 318
..
Adj. Flow (vph) 1173 137 305 70 330 84 234 1352 34 38 1266 346
Perm Perm
Permitted Phases 4 8 2
!:1inimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0
Total Split (s) 77.0 77.0 0.0 77.0 77.0 0.0 15.0 58.5
" .'
6
6
10.0 16.0 16.0
0.0 14.5 58.0 58.0
Maximum Green (s) 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 10.5 52.5
II 1~~~'''b~-.llUIJ.~
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
~~--
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
10.0 52.0 52.0
II.JIi.........
1.0 2.0 2.0
IE
Yes Yes Yes
. ---
None
!lflIj
Recall Mode None None None None None Max
_.~A_III_I! .'lIIl1l1lmr~
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
" '..JIiIIIIIiIIII
Act Effct Green (s) 73.0 73.0 73.0 66.2 57.4
~_~.._~ "__]I""__~
v/cRatio 3.20 0.51 0.74 1.30 1.95 0.22 1.89 0.55
~"""1I~"".1II IllIIII!iIIlIIl- I!.lfillll!__RIlk1B
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
___~mU[ruIT m &IIIIIIIfIIIII.W
LOS F C D F F C F C
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd, at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
-"
P,'",.,J8C
.,;(
~
299
-
l-
f
-
'-
"
t
,. \.
~
.;
Max MaxR MaxR
10th 'Ioile Term Code
Max Max
Hold Hold
Max Hold
Skip MaxR MaxR
Queue Length 95th (ft) #1938 322
520
#422 #2415
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
.
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~,,~~
"',,"" P".J'in;".1R'" "iT"'"
ft
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Vanderbilt Beach Rd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
1:
j
Wilson Miller, Inc.
'BG
300
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
-
..-
1O
0>
c::
()
'-"
"'C
~
co
....
Q)
1O 0 ~77
co co () ~
..- ..- 1O ~304
JlJlC~ ~
~40
Vanderbilt Beach Rd, '" " ~ Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
/' '-..
-7' 11111(
1079-7'
126-7 1O .q- ..-
..- .q- ("<)
-7_ N N
281~ ..-
0>
c::
()
'-"
"'C
~
co
....
Q)
0
()
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
-" - l- -(" - '- "
"8C
301
t
,. \. ~
.;
'~'''J6Ji!''J'' ,tt .m' "
-'" '. .N_ __M;~\~ue: ,'," "'__ __ _
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~t~'~lfijl~~.'~I!iII~"._
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~""~ ,-
Trailing Detector (ft) . 0 0 0 0 0' 0'" 0 0 0 0 0 6
~"'--i'~"-~"~4~!.g-~-'llIlijjnill_
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00
IlEII~~~lS,i!lllillillil~___~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Ii! -r~.~~111i11l.lllllr1Elill~~_iIiI]_._r~1
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
""- -'11'IIIIII-'-~"~--'~I~if-"\~~il" -~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~--fIl~"~~lIl_
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
II -~-____d l\llli"W
Link Distance (ft) , 2684 2276 2084 2338
1079 126 281 40
lur
31 35 1165 318
---0 '" -y-- "-C""-'" l;--~
34 38 1266 346
..
Free
Free Free
Adj. Flow (vph) 1173 137 234
- _ ' ru - :_m",~ _ ~ _ _ - ~!~IR:~g __:~;_
Turn Type Prot Free Prot Free Prot
~------~;;::';"""
Permitted Phases Free Free
"--'"'~,.,~::_~ :';-----~.
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 7.0 10,0 10.0 16,0
~~' ""..JWJ.'" ,
Total Split(s) 41.0 48.5 0.0 14.5 22.0 0.0 15.0 32.5
_lil-~lJl.'iD_-!'IJII__~'_blJ:mli\_"'.'ijl_
~_ -.-~w'Ii:iL/ ~~~~~_~~
Maximum Green (s) 36.5 42.5 10.0 16.0 10.5 26.5 10.0 26.0
_!liIiIim~-'_i$l'-y.ft-@:_\llillllilil_r~:JIm.lII:~.-1r~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
",,;;:,'h;""f."_"" ,%1','"
~'.,- -
, -
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
!(;l- M~"'l:~~;*-~-'C -'it'lr--
I~b'~~j",_~ -__~-
Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max
_"'!iBiiK-&ullfllJJi;}'~'Uil_iii!'l'ili__~f""";J!2l!!lI!j"tlL'l']ili8Bllh.4$,*U ','
_il_.J.m~~i_--_f- -',,'J:, _~%1~~~"'~i
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11,0 11.0 11.0
jjj-'rri!i_L~"Z!i'ill!jR~!2"'lI!lhi_"ftt",,,,,",.'t,,,.'&1,jjk"""._rl1r"'"
~~_i~Trllli@J~.rmtmmr;i;t'mt'1ff)b1i1~~:i~ni,1E ~ ' x
Act Effct Green (s) 37.0 48.2 106.2 7.8 14.3 106.2 10.9 35.9 106.2 7.8 28.0 106.2
--,,--jW".ai--......'71lilt*"r\fJ'..'jjlitM"....... "",'" "
_k'ir~~~~m~df.~lh~",.';.,",:v..~ '"
v/c Ratio 0.98 0.09 0.19 0.18 0.48 0.05 0.66 0.79 0.02 0.16 0.94 0.22
~ i ' ~", ,1I1111!\11.j(il'~~11~r.Bllil~__""
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
'!~.._"""-'1JL_--'1Ii1lllllllr1'11.,Illi''il'~''''.liiiJi''~4\l1'''~''kT'''''''.,.."..""'...,.,"'__'*J'iili'mr''".'"_,illi_1>>
w:~~BJ1_!~@t&lJ~~It~".~: ~w#~~;~I4%~~'?.~'.~ ~:jltQ~i1~;!t~~t~:i01ilil!iffiHfwr4~jfil.a~~~;mp,mfWlrM4M
LOS E BAD D A E DAD D A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd.
2016 Programmed Improvements PM Peak
-" - "). (" - '- "
r 8 C 302
t
,.\.~ "
Approach LOS D D D D
~""",,_Illllllllllllllll
90th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Max Hold Ga~ MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap MaxR
_..~1l1",.I11ll1~_1III! 'II_-~I.I
50th %ile Term Code Max Hold Min Gap Max Hold Min MaxR
.. I~- .__ir.llIIllIII~ ,L_lllllIl1I1IH:ll !RI III
30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Skip Gap Max Hold Skip MaxR
.Iilli! "l.m_lr-~:.--':1IIII
10th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Skip Min Min Hold Skip MaxR
~lIIlw1i '1IiIII!IIiIIIIIIIIllIIIIIIIIIIIIIJlIII!IIIIIIIlII~'[ II~'II~ f'
Queue Length 95th (ft) #575 50 0 32 108 0 124 #437 0 29 #422 0
...,- -,,,~~'~~~~-~'-~1IIII~~IIJll
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
_~~-~'~-""'~lIImlln-~.-
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
__. ' :' 1lIllIlllllllllI
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
Natural Cycle: 110,~,
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
~_IIII_IIl'T'
Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service E
, '~ ,_Il~__'" 7' ':
._IlJIIlf__M", .,
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 109.1
~_____~.;fI"'im.t_I[_IIIIIIlII'=-
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 106.1
""~'S"'" ~ '"j'" r>"~
1 Oth %i1e Actuated Cycle: 103.5
~"IIllI!!IIIn1~""III_.'1m~.llIl!i!_lIllID'III~n.1
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Vanderbiit Beach Rd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
::J;: ~h~ ...F-~ ~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
-ci
.
M 0 ... C
0 0
N " .,; a
'" ~ ;:! N 0
~
~
.
c
.
E
0 ~ '" .
>
'" '" '" a
'" ~ N E
N N '"
C
. E
li 2
~ .
. E
0 e ~
.. '" ~ ~ 0 '" N .
0 0 0 0 '" ~
0 .,; 0 .,; 0 0 ;:! 0 a; 0 oj .
M '" .. ~ .e .s
" . c
c :0 a
0 .. 0
a '. '"
() > 1::
" .
,; c c :>-
0 M M . Q '.
> 0 '" '" E ]j ~
iii ~ '" '" ~ . .
a .s
Ql " . B
- '" c ~
a
.. c ~
C) 'E '0
5 c '"
I- a Q.
l: '" N N '" .., . () .1!
Ql .. ~ '" ;;; 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ .s ~
.., ~ ~ M ~ ~ '5 >
'5 iD
"0 . Q ~
C) " ~
0 .
- m
.. m
.., 0 0 0
> 0 0 0
iii
~
,!!!
"0
u
~
~
.
N ;;; '" .. e
'" 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ "
M ~ ~ ..
0
c
c
"
"
~
;;
:i:
.,
..,
.
0
Be
304
!
l
I"
!j
II!
""s
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
f..... t ,.....~
Be
306
200 200
200 200
Total Lost Time (s)
~o ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O
Trailing Detector (ft)
000 0 0 0
Wi.
III Ii IiO_llJl...~~ .
--
Link Distance (ft)
AM
m
2084
2338
Volume (vph) 559 124 548 1252 362 531
- ~111"'~.~~!llI'~"
Adj. Flow (vph) 608 135 596 1361 393 577
Tum Type custom Prot Prot
,Ill ~~~_R
Permitted Phases 8 8
~
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
.. iJ*f
Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 28.5 28.5 14.5 43.0
Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 22.5 22.5 10.0
Ii: -1Il'llIlfm~' " ""'::" _III
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
I JlIdkl~-""-_.__~1II
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
t -II.
Recall Mode
~ ... "_
Flash Dont Walk (s)
None None
Max
Max None
Max
"'Ellillih' .to
r:,.,>~j?;
"iMi"'tii
, fi"
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
"dill
,;% r:;*
Act Effct Green (s) 16.8 16.8 24.5 24.5 10.5 39.0
11~!l ___m_III__11..ll~_IIl.1l11.1II11l1ll1l1i1111111111111
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.26 0.83 0.75 0.69 0.27
1m 1lIIl..'IifIIIIII;1l'....lIIllll.F.~]Il_,_.dlllIIII.INl BI.llli[lrIm...m _~.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
_r4IXit'*"**lll,_Ji_--!!li-;III11Il""'-"'--""--"--
~~~~!fl!i5.L~~~~~ ,. ,=~~4f~EtW!W!J$V)lIllIlI!llit'JW41!%t~4I!iif2I~mtl1
WS C A C A C A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd,
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
~ Be
307
f '-
t
I'
\. ~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
~UIII~-'----~~ ~
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
.
-
Splits and Phases:
\..1
3: Golden Gate Blvd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~ ~6
.....
r( .s
WilsonMiller, Inc.
..
..
..
-
...
...
...
;:\
...
~
..
..
...
..
~
~
...
..
"
~8C
308
:!
'" ;;; '" <0; '" :!
'" ;:\ ~i '"
~ '" ..
0
.;:
..
c .. ~J ~I
.. 0;
" .....;
rn !
..
';:
..
:;; '" , Ni
(0;
,; .. ~ <04', (\I,
0 C"); ~i
> ~ M Ni N;
iii .c
.. - 0 01 01 0
- ~
.. 0 0; 0; "' "
.. U'); It':l; e c
C) M U"ii a::ii I- "
~ '" Nj N' .>- 0
C ~ '. U
.. 0 . 0 ~ ~
"I:J N >
E U [( . .
"0 " . 0 ~ " 0
<; 'e' ~ "
C) > 0 0
0> 0>' 0> 0>' .. I- U "
- '" cqj '" cqj " . .>- <i .
ci ci . '" ~
.. of o~ E '. '. . ~
c ~ 0 ~ . [(
"I:J 0> " u E .
~ c U "
> 0 o. o. <: . 0 <; ..
0 0; 0; '0' "
iii ~ 1"-, 0, 0 . >
c Q: <i
,..: llO1 N~ "' 0 u ~ '"
~ '" N' "'. e N . c 0 .
.!! I- u " " N I
c E
" . " 0 0> ~ "
" ~ 0 .
;<! ci . <;
0 !'!. 0 .. >
"' 0 or
0 '" '" . . '" ~ ~
" " i= '" . 0
~ l- s: .
l- I- e
:> :> " 0 ~ ~
'" '" "5 '" ::: ~
~ ~ I- .. I- <:
- " e ~ e g EO
.
.
"5
z
,
! I
~ .
! ,
; !
!oj
;:.;h
'BC
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
310
f '-
t
I"
\.~
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95
I l.,d!l_ ~-~~~lIIilIIlBIW'-A."'I_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
IlII ~ r~. 1]1fIIlII_~"'_J_11 rr lllir.
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
!!II!; 1~"""'_lT~- liil
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes
~---....-- ...
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2276
Link Distance (ft)
2084
2338
Volume (vph) 638 141 666 1331 543 873
1iII_..~""~'~~-1IlI"-'
Adj. Flow (vph) 693 153 724 1447 590 949
Permitted Phases
Minimum Initial (s)
Maximum Green (s)
All-Red Time (s)
',~-
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
If 1~__II!ltIII_"""""--'
Recall Mode None None Max Max None Max
)iii;' mtifi!J ~.
'.!l:0Q
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
........-~ ",
Act Effct Green (s) - lf9 17.9" 31.0 31.0 14.0 49.0
," '____~_IIII ,WIIIIII_
v/c Ratio 0.84 0.31 0.94 0.82 0.92 0.41
iII- 1!1III1_Jli![lJjl!III1__IlI'iIr"--~'''~l 1---oIIIII.1111[11I1_ -~j"
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
, "~~.::, ':_..11.11.....
LOS DAD A D A
"-Ia.._~
11.0
"fa"!], f ,. ;&;
Wilson Miller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
'8G
311
f
'-
t
,.
\. ~
10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
.~~U~
Queue Length 95th (ft) #245 43 #536 180 #234 127 , ,
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
Starvation Cap Reductn .a 0 0 , 0 0 0 , .. ,.. ,
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
.~--1IIIIIIllIlI
II -
Cycle Length: 75
· '-_."".~''1i)_ii~--'"'''' 'ITllm~-~'!BI)II '"'--'wrl-'m~_
Natural Cycle: 75
~ -'---'1'-"__D-Y"m_~'-~._-~......'..__r.,.___,.,,_
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94
1~~"----~1IIIi1iIIIIIIII
Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service D
, ~T-,;""m
90th 'Ioile Actuated Cycle: 75
.
50th 'Ioile Actuated Cycle: 75
"-~-""..-"--'I~I}:!~w=.
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 74.6
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
n'."
~ 06
Splits and Phases: 3: Golden Gate Blvd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~h . ,
IIIffiI:lIII l' 08
J
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
312
.. .... .. CDt
.... ;?; '" ..,;
.... '" OJ
~.
...
<>
'"
;:
~
"' '" 0;
:: M ......;
"'-1
...
M
;; "' (0: <> ~
;0. M M: .... ....
'" '" 0)1 ....
0
'C
10
C N 1,1")1
GI .... 1"-; ;;;
lJ I{); 0);
-ci en N "-1
> 10
iii 'C
10
GI :!!
-
10 ~ .... 01 10;
C) "' ~1 ~~
...
C '" N; C'"ij
GI .c u
z
'tl - m
0 ~ <> o! 01 "
C) <> 0; 0; "
<D 0> C!.i v.J 0 ..
- .... ,.: gi vi " . ~
10 Q M ("); m C m
'" ,
-ci N '" 0
"
> '. .
iii . Cl m
E " 0 r< .
, . 0; c
... " '2' " ,
.!!! 0> 0>; 0> 0>; m ~ 0
"' 0:), "' lX); > a. '" "
0 6 d~ 6 c>! c .. '" 0. ~
. -~ '. "'
E .
U c .. Cl u. E
<> <> 0: ~ c " " , 0;
0> 0> N, ~ -< . 0 " a.
"' '" CD, . 2' :> >
N '" cOt 0 c 0.
" a. ~
... M (<)~ <l ~ "'
m . c 0 .
'" " , , N :r: E
c
~ . >E e '" ~ ,
.. ~ <> m :g
e 0 ~ .,; .
t- " 0 " a.
"' "' m . '" ~ ~
:> :> '" "' . 0
~ t- ;: m
t- t- e
:J :J jj Cl ~ ~
"' "' 0 "' :l :{
u. U. t- o.
~ ~ 6: ~ @: ~ t::
"
.
<5
z
;
l
> ,
! ,
l~j
. ,
. ,
. 8e
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
314
f '- t ,. \. ~
200 200
Wo -,,,,
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft)
o 000 0 0
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95
"" - lIIIl~ml~ "'lf1lKII~'""'~__~.1II11l71111
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950
dliI~~'Ww'~'II"/lIIIIlIIIIi ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950
I elm, - ~ -~~T__,_I.III.~"-'.
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes
____~'iI~-"'~'~.il~1l ~i~'"
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
, 'iliIIIl!IlIl!B_lIl11l1l:1l_lIllIllIllIl
Link Distance (ft) 2276 2084 2338
1_ -1'II1iIJJ1Ii1Il1~.
Volume (vph) 804 171 779 1547 638 1046
____~--'~'-i.Il-llii!IlIiIIillItw_1IIIiiIlI
Adj. Flow (vph) 874 186 847 1682 693 1137
3l" I ImlllllllllJ
II
. '
'.
l1
Turn Type custom Prot Prot
Permitted Phases 8 8
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 16.0
.'
Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 52.9
iBffJilmr( '.
"0mrw&
Maximum Green (s) 25.0 25.0 46.9 46.9 21.6 73.0
~"';x
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
~_~~-!iliiIiLlllmll~!l.U'_II_
Lead,Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
,_1II11111Iilillll[IlItJJ1 .-
Recall Mode None None Max Max None Max
___=_J_1I1i1i111.~.._L ~'~__
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0. 11,0 11.0 11.0
',-~ '.4
Act Effct Green (s) 27.0 27.0 48.9 48.9 22.1 75.0
H 1I_1~.II.lIlllITI' ___;_IIIIIIl;_____
v/c Ratio 1.04 0.36 1.02 0.93 1.00 0.47
&1]1 1IIIlIiI'lr~~'" II!! ~_'ll'__11!_dllJ__"__
, - III ' , ",~___lii___rrK_!!!_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I!r '-. -__0n~' ~wllll!i!. .1_IIHBIIIi,..IIIIIlf1_IIU'ISlII1IlIl!llllllllll1l,."J_"',n
LOS F A E C E A
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Golden Gate Blvd,
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
8G
315
f '-
t
,... \. ~
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max
70th %ile Term Code
Max Max
Max MaxR
!Ill r.'- ---'-- 1-
30th %i1e Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
~ -----'-_.11I--il.'.
10th %i1e Term Code Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR
__I 1IIlIIB>~-"""""-'" _ .J_._--J-....L "II!
Queue Length 95th (ft) #467 71 #876 #548 #381 220
Ii'll -1IIIl1 ~If~---II ..--..!:[ .'-"'P'II
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200
Cycle Length: 110
----'~
Natural Cycle: 110
~ . %y" ~~ .". \#' ''''';~ ',C
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04
I ",
Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.1 % ICU Level of Service F
~'~--~
90th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 110
&~~IIIf~-4lIJ'iit--_._._~<--- -
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 110
r---rlf_1!l:+EI_IIi~__
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 110
~- ~'-'~-'ij"'-'~---'\il _
Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles,
piilll!'llllll_~~l--"'''1II1IIIIIIIII~I.11 I
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Golden Gate Blvd. & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
,;;J l. ., ,>-.
J
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Be
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
316
8e
317
~
2
00 ~ ~ ~ c
.,; '" ..: .; 8
~ M ~ N
.
~
.
E
.
E
00 m M ~ ~
~ M ;:\ ;;; 0
00 ;;; E
N N m
c
2 I
. E
~ .
~ "
00 N m M 0 m ~
'" w .,; .,; .,; '" 00 M '" W m ~
~ '" W N ~ M N N ;; N ~ .
"
. . c
E :a 0
, .. u
0 '. "
U > ~
. .
E c ~
;; ~ m ~ . ,Q '.
.,; M ;: ~ E ~ ~
~ ~ M ~ " .
0:: 0 E "
~ . , ~
.. c 0
m u
Cl c g 0 '"
" .~ u c '"
it: c c ~
~ 0 .
N 0 N '" ~ m ili N ~ U ~ .
.. N W ;;; ~ ~ 0 ~ ;; h "
l: ~ N M ~ ~ M 00 C ~ " ~
0: ii => ~
'. ~
- !" ~
.. .
.,; m
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
iii 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0;
~
~
"0 . " "
0 . . .
~ >- >-
c . .
, . . c
0 . . 0
U .. .. .
2 .
.
~ w
~
.
i .
~
N 0 N ~ ~ m w N ~ 0
N ~ ;;; ~ ill ~ 0 ~ i2 i;
~ N M ~ M 00 ..
,
c
c
<
u
.
0
.
X
'3
.
.
c
j
Be
318
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
,.-..
..-
1O
0>
0::
()
'-'
"'C
2=
co
....
Q)
0 ~101
OlON ()
..- ..- ..-
Jtt~ ~195
pO
Pine Ridge Rd, (CR 896) ",,>,/ Pine Ridge Rd, (CR 896)
I "-
779-3 111(
568~ O>NO
..-NCO
372~~ ("<)ON
1O ..-
0>
0::
()
'-'
"'C
2=
co
....
Q)
0
()
-"
-
,.
f
-
'- "
Be 319
t ,. \. ~ .;
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd,
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
t ." "i"i >t.,. 'i+t
'~4j~j_~g~k"'. "
200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
, ~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~' .,.."IIlP-~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~~-
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
~IIlIIIIJ.!iII&~_'-I' 1iIIiIIIf~
Fit Protected 0.950 0,950 0.950 0.950
lillIII1IT W~II~-"~-111lP1i1!l!_11lW~1I!1l-~lj1llllUt-]I
Fit Permitted 0,950 0.950 0.950 0.950
_""lIlIIIIIIlIIII"lilllllBll_&_'1lilD~~~~"'_~""T~ '.1Il
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_'i3-~~-''''~~r''-~.
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
"E' ""'" ',~
779 568 372 80 101 319 1022 260 112 815 310
""":~" '1'~"'
Volume (vph)
,. ... ".......< -w= ''''
617 404
347 1111 283 122 886 337
. IIJI.1!~_
Prot Perm Prot Perm
Permitted Phases
~, ~;DJ;,i~:~mrn%l!f--m0t;,.'..w; .1X.... c,' ,'.",. 'Y','"""", . -,' '"''
~--~"
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
_JlillIlllllllllr .
Total Split (s) 34.6 43.0 43.0 14.5 22.9 0.0 27.0 48.0 48.0 14.5 35.5 35.5
_""~Fl."j_8Hjffii)"'1Il~'II_0I\!ilii""'~.,\jl1"iilJ1iUil7l!>l!>0I\_~_~_!i___""
_1!~iW!~_~___~___..<l! _. il!!_
Maximum Green (s) 30.1 37.0 37.0 10.0 16.9 22.5 42.0 42.0 10.0 29.5 29.5
~'iI ,". 'Jlih\t~i:I~"-"'-lI'mllli"s' ',% "
..' .... ,/ " . 1":/'3mflll.~~ 'J~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
_""_72"___"_41' '..~~' '0i_j~____
~f"~ffill!ffl~ ,,; ..~~ . ~~_~
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
~1!___Jr~~~~
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max None Max Max
____~..:~.. li 'Al~;"'," """~WF;
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
4
. "".,
2 6
...~~
10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0
=0iiPlljf~]Ri~OO~i~MlI:_i~_~ifa1ll1&?;=~-'~/1,~?' . ~,=/
~?!.Effct ~,reen (S)'8,,}9.6 "'~.II~"il_il~-~~Il_
v/c Ratio 0.97 0.95 0.56 0.30 0.55 1.02 0.85 0.40 0.79 0.95 0.55
-~~_.h~'_r"Hij_~i1~'_F'jFi!Dllil'4!l'~"'''''''''''''lfi~_~'llBl!f~'''jil[[""I!
___J!ilm_~~_, " !I!IL.rr....liillii'_.lIl~L_iIj!_ii?_"'__ ,_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
"", '. .. ", ' , "'i""'!ltEr..'..""'_...J'filrniii<""',_"'''.'..,ffi,i<J''''0Ji:':;yi'4Al_.!l!r,Sl'^'''f0'*-'''..T.-'''_.!i7
lI';~ ,,^ ..~~_II0li_ml!l'!l!il1!)i1fl':!lJll~J!il'~'~'i!!i!i',~~.;""_Jli!.d!J!Uisi',llji~_i~_~_i
LOS E E B D D FDA F E B
11.0
11.0
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2004 Existing Conditions PM Peak
.-t -l- f
Be
320
- '- " t ,. \. l .;
90th %i1e Term Code
Max Max Max Max Max
Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
70th %i1e Term Code
Max Max Max Max Hold
Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
Max MaxR MaxR
Max MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Min Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
.
Queue Length 95th (ft) #465 #732 191 59 146 #475 507 109 #198 #487 135
200 200 200
I ~.
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 120
.~ iI_~--- "--7" 11III
10th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 119.1
" IXUi
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~: ..J f"Ji ~ i: .J*oi "Fe oi ~
WilsonMiller, Inc.
',8L
321
:$ g .. 01 N :; ..j ~ .. ~l -
~ ~[ .. t1 .. ~
N '" '" ..
.:
;!; 01 ~ :::
<0'
.E
j
0 0 '" 01 <0 .. ;!! :J: <0 ~j N e
<0 0 ~ ;;;i .. N .. "
'" '" .. co, N1 ~
c
w
.E .
c .
.. 01 N1 ~~
;Of ~ 0
~ ..; 10, u>
<'1i qi ...
......1 N'
~ lO!
0;
'" 10,
ri ri[
.,;
0::
CIl
Cl 0
." ~ .
E
it: " ,
~ 0
CIl '. u
C c . "'
. .
a:: E 0 a: . "'
0 E "
, . ~ .
- en1 <5 e , ,
co: > 0 0
'" " " u il
.,; of E . ~ 0. .
. '. .. '" .
~ E ~ C . a:
c .. ~ E
m 0: g~ .. c 0 U , .
("); ~ <( . 0 <5 Q. .
~ .....; N, . e ::; > .
<Xii enl <l! c 0. ~
,!!! C"'li ....., 0 Q. . '"
. N . ~ 0 . <5
, r
'0 ~ ~ c , N E >
~ . ~ e .. ~ , .
U " .. 0 . !! ~
0 <> .
~ ~ i\ Q. "
~ " 0
'" '" . ~ ~ t Q:
" <D .
~j ::; ::; \; ~ ;, . .E
~ ~j ~ ~ e
~ ~ .. " 0 0 c
<:Of co; '" '" E '" :! ~ ~ ~
N C\l] ~ ~ ~ Q. 0
~ " e " " " € ~
u
"
.E
~i 0
g 01 z
'" ~[
,
I
h
'Be
322
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
.--..
..-
1O
Ol
0:::
()
.......
"'C
2=
co
....
Q)
0 ~121
NOlO ()
COI'-N
J tOlt~ ~34
P6
Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896) ~ ./ Pine Ridge Rd, (CR 896)
/ .............
941~ liir
674~ co.q-O
CO.q-O
441~~ ("<)N("<)
1O ..-
Ol
0:::
()
.......
"'C
2=
co
....
,92
0
()
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
-" - l-f
~
Be
323
-
'-
"
t
,.
\. ~
.;
~~1iIl1I-~' tt 1'.*1' 'i it"" Of'
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
__'II!__'\~Ln_' l ilil'R .1,w_rr._'El_
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~..rU~_I'" "',.."l'..;1'
,.railing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
;:; ,. ...,". mw;;
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
.,,~~, '.~!lWIl--".r_I"'._~
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
~_.~~"iBlll~- "'-~W_k"rxalifi"'fmiIIIIIIUf~
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
~-1IIIIIW_1II~-"'~""'~ ~t..,__,>",,,w_-,,,
RightT um on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
_li-_o,,~~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
IrrlllB,i ',"
Volume (vph)
~.- "==~.,,- ~'"
941
674 441
...
733 479
96
234
121
368 1244
300
125
970
362
104
i .8
254
132
400 1352
Turn Type
'inti
Prot
Perm
Prot
326 136 1054 393
'!Oillllllilill/.ili___
~
Perm Prot Perm
'~m_m fV /M ._,.. ':' m"7"
2
6
"
Permitted Phases
"
Minimum Initiar(s) 10.0 16,0 16.0
1IllII&_1lI!II_.~ '
Total Split (s) 47.5 56.0 56.0
!!!P!!~:~.o 50.050.0
-~-"--:!,,:._llI'I
~... 'm ~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0
,w:i ;j"""""-'-~ ""XCi . '"' '''~'''''''''~'''''''.i'--,"
i~"""-
10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0
- - ----
,
16.0
10.0
16.0
16.0
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
__IIIlfIIlIlIll..II!IlIIr:",!i1~nl!!~IIII!!r~'!1Il
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max None Max Max
.,..!r' 1, " "
14.5 23.0 0.0 34.0 63.6 15.9 45.5 45,5
~----.. m....
10.0 17.0 29.5 57.6 11.4 39.5 39.5
~_...
1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
or; ,
" . ~ -
Flash DonIWalk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
--~?II"""'*~'^'''''l!it,.p;''':'''~I!..,-'E!w'W"l..IJiU__2tn
~_~~~I~&i~4_lilT'~.'" .j'~' _:Tff,' . ...~..-~2.~~~~
Act EffctGreen (s) 43,5 52.0 52.0 10.5 19.0 30.0 59.6 59.6 11.9 41.5 41.5
_T~~lIil.C';'. . '"...' :_"_tl~1lIii.l!
v/cRatio 1.03 1.13 0.69 0.43 0.82 1.13 0.96 0.45 0.97 1.08 0.66
-_.~'''_~~lI.irgjlllillil1''__~.ilIlEIIlIIJII''''''~l1l1lWlt1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
r_-ilr_"""""",,!Oiici'''s'ioa'''i8tllir7ii'' '..'.li.."rr_Eilfii0_,M'''rl>iiii...''''''.-.'''l&1-..'..'rWiI~''iiirr''''''.''__[ffiii
~--~Eiiil!!~i~~.,~J:lBBli<~~.s_!li!nmi!1!iilI:..i..~~_t!Jj~
LOS F F C E E F E B F F C
Wilson Miller, Inc,
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2011 No Improvements PM Peak
8e
324
-"
-
l-
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
~
90th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
~--~
70th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
Max Max Max
50th %ile Term Code
Max
30th 'Ioile Term Code
10th 'Ioile Term Code
Max Max Max Max Hold
Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
#685 #1081 367 84 #247 #665 #832 200 #277 #741 285
1IIII__1Ir~ IIII '1.~iLv,nI.1Il
Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~~I""'__II ]r"".mrU_,illl- "''ltl_
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
...-- ( ""' ."~
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'"1II11f1~!.,jhili~jifmr.._i-~
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.13
- ilf-IIifij'
Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.3% ICU Level of Service G
~__lP"
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 150
~~I"'--".I!'-'~ --'-".11.
10th %ile Actua~d Cycle: 150
(~' '*"
11l!lIr_~ mr-.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
-'"
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:
I"'. I j 1I.i
" ..s '
3: Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
,l1 ~ ~::.ki~
~
11D14-ea
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd,
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
Be
326
"J- - l- :j'" ........ '- "" t ~ \. ~ .;
Storage Length (ft)
200
200 200
200 200
200 200
200
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector (ft)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00
il'.. ~~~~--'-~. 11:111.' a- -~'1IIIIIlI
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
i- ~ --~- iIIIIlilT"-"- '1 -111I'"'1&1111- ~Il_
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
l>' ~ -"__._ ~_I !ELii'" l".~
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~-----......
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
11m '~~_II_.-'l~_
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
Volume (vph) 941 674 441 96 234 121 368 1244 300 125 970 362
~~-~
Adj. Flow (vph) 1023 733 479 104 254 132 400 1352 326 136 1054 393
'lIIIIIIIIJ~~~
Tum Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm
ltditUi__i
".i.&~~m;~J
Permitted Phases 4 2 6
':-
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0
. .' ,~ '~~JII
Total Split(s) 37.8 47.0 47.0 14.5 23.7 0.0 17.0 34.0 34,0 14.5 31.5 31.5
~~
Maximum Green (s) 33.3 41.0 41.0 10.0 17.7 12.5 28,0 28.0 10.0 25.5 25.5
. oi1lllllllllllll
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 ~.O 1.0 2.0 2.0
~ .
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
lilliIJ ".....llIi___"..II-_~rv.-__._
Recall Mode None None None None None None Max Max None Max Max
Flash Dont Walk (s) " 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
~ :'IfJllillJlllliiIlIB
Act Effct Green (s) 33.8 43.0 43.0 10.5 19.7 13.0 30.0 30.0 10.5 27.5 27.5
."'1-"'_11III' . ,]Ill
v/c Ratio 0.97 1.01 0.60 0.32 0.58 0.99 0.97 0.52 0.80 0.83 0.57
__11_ "'~1f'dllEiilllEillll_~lr:t~
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
__IIIIllIllIDIIII_...lIII jJlli]LItlI~_~_.JIIIIII.~~~~
LOS E E B D D F E B FDA
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2011 Additional Improvements PM Peak
Be
327
-"
-
l-
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
70th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
.
50th %i1e Term Code Max Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
10th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
T um Bay Length (ft)
II ___
Starvation Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
11.. _
Cycle Length: 110
,.l'~ ---"'---~~--".'.=._I"~~".~-~I-__~
Natural Cycle: 110
Iil-----~"'~~'.,~=='-~.~I--'-"~'--~'"j-'jllllll
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01
fif"1- ---'-___~--~
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.5% ICU Level of Service E
^ ^" ." ."' ... . . . .. ... ... . .' ". ,..... ....' '. . ... ~
90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 110
~--.Ii~
50th %i1e Actuated Cycle: 110
~~__"'-_I.iJ;r__7__~'~Ir.'-~ ~
10th %i1eActuated Cycle: 110
~I~-"'~---~~
Queue shown Is maximum after two cyc~es;". '"
"' ...,'
Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles,
Splits and Phases:
t ,"'~
J+- .s
1
WilsonMiller, Inc.
'ae
328
'" N .. 01 a Sl -i .. '" ;J ..
~ ~ ~ N' .. t::j ~ ~ ::!
"'- ~ 0; ~ "', N
-1 -1
'" ~, 0 N~
~ 0' ~ PH 'j
~, I
! j
..
'" '" '" ....i '" ~I .....1 '" 0 'It! '" ~
'" ;;; ~ C;;! ;; ~, '" ~ ... ~
"'. ..., .. Nj "
! ! .
,
.
0 c
'i: w
.. " .
C ",' ~! ...-i ~ .
N E
Gl m! r--i 0.2
U "'. ~l '"':i <qi ~o
UJ N! '-'>
" ..
Cl: 'i:
..
.. :!i
'" ~ ~j
" ..
ii: ~ It)!
ri coil
.. .s::. !
C - ~
ii: ~ ~
~
- .
.. CD 0 ~
~ " . m
" 0 . "
N != ,
> 0
iii '" '-'
'.
. " .
~ .
E 13 ~ .
~ 0>1 , . .. . c
" '~ ,
"0 <X:Ii > " 0 0
......! cij <L >- '-'
U " . '" "- .
. '. '. "' .
E ~ . ~
c " ~
cd ~i Qi '" .. '-' ~ .
(")i Co ~ c 13
::il ci; <( . 0 " <L
. "j2' " >
Mi 0 c "-
~i "'. "'. " 0 <L 5 "'
. N . ~ 0
!= 13 , C N I .
c , E
]j . " 0 C> ~ ,
.. ~ 0 .
0 '!l. 0 ~ ci . "
>- " 0 or <L >
"' "' . . '" ~ ~ .
" " != ro . 0 .
>- >- ]j ~ b " ~ E
" " 0 " ,
"' "' {3. "' ~ ~ 0 "
~ ~ <L <( >
~ " '!: e € t=: .
~ ~
"
.
<L
"
c
~
0
~
'-'
" :l
. '" 0
~ 0- 0 .
0 Q: E "
0;
N ~ 5 >
.,!:::1- 0
" "
.
u '" c
0 .
,"" "E E
0 .
Q: 0 >
>- 0
"
5 1l E
5 ",0 w
~ 0 00.
I ad~ E S
0 ~ . .
> "
;
l
,
H
hi
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
'aG
330
-"
- l-
.
-
'- "
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Storage Length (ft)
--III
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ~,_,L II
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
I ~IIIII_" .1Jl"'I~A_""._11.m~lIlli!1l_
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
I -lIT" ~I ~---r--'~"'~_
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
- ------- ~iiIl17" 1'-" __.....-___]~m_l_
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
.
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~-~~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
""t ~__III
Volume (vph) 1007 711 466 100 244 126 383 1335 312 126 1020 379
, ---
Adj. Flow (vph) 1095 773 507 109 265 137 416 1451 339 137 1109 412
. '~t__
Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm
__IJlIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIlilI!III_1
Permitted Phases 4 2 6
10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0
'91li, '
"""Jk., ~'h!
48.1 57.0 57.0 14.5 23.4 0.0 33.0 63.1 63.1 15.4 45.5 45.5
I
10.9 39.5 39.5
II
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
~1~_'_'IlI!~'..III11n1~ 'IS."ll
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
, '_I
Max None Max Max
---
11.0 11.0
Minimum Initial (s)
10.0
16.0
16.0
10.0
16.0
'=
Maximum Green (s) ,
43.6
51.0
51.0
10.0
17.4
28.5
57.1
Recall Mode
None None None
Flash Dont Walk (s)
---. '
Act Effct Green (s) 44.1 53.0 53.0 10.5 19.4
Im1IIil IIJI_I__II_'
v/c Ratio 1.09 1.17 0.72 0.45 0.84
IIIIli -,. ,.
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
.I'I!I!II~~''', ,'"
LOS F F C E E
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
29.0 59.1 59.1 11.4 41.5 41.5
----
1.22 1.04 0.47 1.01 1.13 0.70
-
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
"~"'lIRllltllm
B F F C
:.ii it'
F
E
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2016 No Improvements PM Peak
Psc
331
-"
-
l-
..
-
-\..
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
90th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
.
70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
.
50th 'Ioile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
Max Max Max Max Max
30th %ile Term Code
Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
10th %lle Term Code Max Max Max Max Hold Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
Starvation Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~torage Cap Reductn
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Cycle Length: 150
--~-IP'~~llIlIIIIlrw'~-"~~"~"""~~':::1r-~"---""-'''~11
Natural Cycle: 150
· _liW~~-_',lOl"'~~-~"--""'" "~"~''''-~~'-?~IIl'''.-'-'iI-'1I "==....~..~....~rrlll
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.22
~~~_~__8"_~
Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.5% ICU Level of Service G
.
90th 'Ioile Actuated Cycle: 150
~~-----~~
50th 'Ioile Actuated Cycle: 150
.--~"-]
1 Oth %lle Actuated Cycle: 150
r~-""I~~'~-=.__
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
"iiiil
Splits and Phases:
~: T ~"
3: Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
,J:~7J~ e4
ji .6 ~.r .
WilsonMiller, Inc.
~Br:
<~... ....
332
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
..--
..-
1O
0>
0:::
()
.........
"'C
>
co
....
Q)
o
0> ~ co () ~126
I'- 0 N ~ ?44
en T"'"" ~ ~
J t t t\ f= 100
Pine Ridge Rd, (CR 896) ""> ,,/ Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896)
/]~
1007~ 11111('
711--7 ("<) 1O N
----7 co ("<) ..-
466~ ("<)~("<)
0>
0:::
()
.........
"'C
.2:
co
....
Q)
o
()
Collier Blvd. at Pine Ridge Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
Be
333
-"
-
l-
f
-
'-
"
t
~
\.
~
.;
Storage Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~-~ JIIU__IJIJ -Ifm .1~iIII!!'_-"-'-"""ql.5~:~
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~-~~
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~----'.-~.A iii
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00
~ -"'........-.~ - --rrII'lIIIIII7r___iJifIlJiC!
Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
_fJ_--llI" "Z"II-"-Ir--~ -'-'li!I!~-~!IIJi".
Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
_,,,- -~'~ '.1 ~---1lIIlIli!llilllll~-- ..JI-m.iBllIE
Right Tum on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
~~""~
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~1IIIIIIIlIiIIII~
Link Distance (ft) 2684 2276 2084 2338
~~
Volume (vph) 1007 711 466 100 244 126 383 1335 312 126 1020 379
"'''''' i''','," ,- ","" "" ~
137 1109 412
'.. '~
Perm Prot Perm
~
Permitted Phases 4 2 6
-~~""'~if.
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 16.0 16.0
~~~~___illl~r.1ll
Total Split (s) 38.3 45.8 45.8 14.5 22.0 0.0 18.0 35.2 35.2 14.5 31.7 31.7
i'lt5~V, , Jilll! .,' . , .'
Maximum Green (s) 33.8 39.8 39.8 10.0 16.0 13.5 29.2 29.2 10.0 25.7 25.7
1[1"'.."" 'almB~i~
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2,0 1.0 2.0 2.0
P'~0' , . ,.. -. ^.. "'_ .... 'C&1".F"'j .. -,,- 11: C';'
~ead..La(J Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
'r~ 'l1IIIIllrdlllllllllllllll1E!llf
None Max Max None Max Max
Adj. Flow (vph)
~ ..,:
Turn TXpe
1095
773
507
109
265
Prot
Prot
Perm
Prot
Recall Mode
, ,
" d'i '"
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11,0 11.0
. '",""'=- ,4;/",,"',""""'-- r:~"~"'w -+{1'--_-"'~":~--_j~N .40. -:_~~~__~,~
Act Effct Green (s) 34.3 41.8 41.8 10.5 18.0 14.0 31.2 31.2 10.5 27.7 27.7
lII.t~--''"'--'''f~S'lXJm'''''d.'_''''''''''''I''''nwBiiil\r't'f''M#~m'''''''il'!IlL'BK'\;1[El'-::~QO:;0ilimm~
._,-"'-""~~~~~ m~~rmt!v~jjU!~f!i,~'M\~~~
v/c Ratio 1.02 0.57 0.65 0,33 0.66 0.95 1.01 0.53 0.81 0.87 0.59
-i'-lI'~II-.!r-Dlf!'-__'_--Ii"---&.Jiiffr.ii!~.Iil!:l~_Jj7'dl$Iililll\l!l"rvi'~jjj,
~ ~,,----~~~!l~_~~lii_&~.1?!jji]~~!!_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fif; ':;'!' ..,.. lIi---"iliiY-..n""'II~i!!itlW"..rv"f!rIij~~~'~"'f4l,,*d"!fj;!J~'l'i'1l
lI1!" . , "~._-_._,"'_~ltL.._!!a."!14__,I';J!1J!rll!!!~~,.""^..,,r&,,
WS E C B D D F E B FDA
,{I
None None None None None
'1",' pu..WM
"""
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Collier Blvd, at Pine Ridge Rd.
2016 Additional Improvements PM Peak
...
Be
334
-"
-
l-
f
-
'-
"
t
,.
\.
~
.;
Approach LOS
D
D
E
D
Max MaxR MaxR
,
o
MaxR MaxR
90th %ile Term Code
Max Max Max Max Max
70th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
i, . .~
-. '
50th %i1e Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
. -......-,.. -lIIIII'IfPI'!lll 1-" 1IIIIlIIIIIIIII--:IIlII~nlii~iII!
30th %lle Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
-- .~-~ -IIIIIIIlBlI,li____ ]~
10th 'Ioile Term Code Max Hold Hold Max Max Max MaxR MaxR Max MaxR MaxR
1II1111.....[II~-.-_ ._ ~.I.III111D11w.lIlIIIDr.llilfr...
Queue Length 95th (ft) #554 287 238 65 170 #249 #489 127 #203 331 91
1 II ~.~[.~~~IIl!I..~"""'_lPV-lIi-
Tum Bay Length (ft) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
~. --..-.~
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- . '1 11"'._lIlIlIIIIIIIiII
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-'-~-lIlIIIIII.---~,.....-r--r-~~raw~Sl
it'
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02
ICU Level of Service E
50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 110
- '..-.
10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 110
__~~r~-__Jm,_
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
_m_liII.~illi;lt___
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 3: Pine Ridge Rd. (CR 896) & Collier Blvd. (CR 951)
~:,t. i~~.~ "fc.
Wilson Miller, Inc.
The Town of Ave Maria DRI
Sufficiency Response #1
rac
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council = SWFRPC
South Florida Water Management District = SFWMD
Florida Department of Transportation = FDOT
Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization = MPO
Collier School Board = School Board
Question 9: Maps
SWFRPC: Map 0 does not show all the uses indicated in the discussion of this map
on page 9--1, please provide.
Response: Map D has been revised to more clearly indicate the Rural Lands
Stewardship Overlay designations in the vicinity of the DRI boundary. Revised
Map D is included with this submittal.
9i3012004-141173 Vel: 03!-JCANTREL
-,
037BI}..013.{)QO..PDSs.-Z8753
-
-
-
~
i ;;;<;":: I
..
cr ~
.j:>. 0 .
0 u
, ..' €
~ . w
~ . - 0 > . ,
0 ,; . ~ ;;I ~ !
MAP D
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
_________n. __.._. _......_...... I I I....
Question 10: General Proiect Description
SWFRPC:
We concur with the SFWMD question on this discussion.
SFWMD:
Certain aspects of the proposed development program are vague. In
addition. the square footage for each of the proposed land use types
should be shown on Table 10.1B-2.
Response: Please see revised Table 10.1.B-2 below.
Table 10.1.B-2
Proposed Land Uses
rac
FlUCCS land Use Approximate Maximum Number of Units/Square Percent
Code Acres F oota!1e of Total
120, 126 Residential, Medium Density, 2,921 11,000 dwelling units 58.5
With or Without Golf Course 450 assisted livina units*
1711 University/Schools 995 6,000 university students 19.9
orivate K-12 school
100 Mixed Use** 328 690,000 sq.ft. - retail/service 6.5
510,000 sq.ft. - office
400 hotel rooms
35,000 sa.ft.- medical
814 Roadwavs 242 N/A 4.8
170,830 Institutional (non-university) 211 148,500 sq.ft. - civic/community 4.2
nublic K-8 school
524 lakes 175 N/A 3.5
600 Wetland Preserve 62 N/A 1.3
180 Recreational le.a., Parks) 61 N/A 1.3
Total 4.995 100.0
*
Assisted living units may also be located in mixed use designation.
Residential dwelling units and civic/community uses may also be located in mixed use
designation.
**
9/3012004- 141773 Ver: 031- JCANTREL
,-,
03786.-013-000-POSS-28753
'BC
.'~. ..
~1
Question 12: Veaetation and Wildlife
SWFRPC:
According to the FWC, additional seasonal wildlife surveys are necessary
to determine the full number of listed species and other wildlife using the
proposed development site.
Response: As noted in the application (Section 12.B.), intensive listed species
surveys that met or exceeded FWC protocols were performed. These surveys
spanned a 14-month period, totaled 562 person-hours in the field, and were
conducted on 51 different days. The only season not covered intensively was the
period from early September through mid-late December. FWC has indicated the
possible need for additional surveys in this season to document if Florida black
bear (Ursus american us floridanus) or Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger
avicennia) are present onsite. The applicant is currently consulting with FWC to
clarify this issue.
SWFRPC:
What is the status of the historical wading bird habitat immediately
adjacent to the central portion of the DRI?
Response: The historical wading bird habitat referenced above related to a
wading bird breeding colony just west of the DRI (FWC colony atlas number
619155). The last recorded observation for this great egret colony was 1988. An
intensive aerial survey was performed in the middle of the wet season on August
12,2004. The survey covered a one-mile radius around the atlas location, and
found no wading bird colonies within that area.
SWFRPC:
Additional information regarding the conservation easements and a map
showing the location of the set asides for the Florida Panther and other
wide-ranging species is necessary.
Response: Copies of the Stewardship Easements for Stewardship Sending
Areas (SSAs) 1-4 are provided with this response. Map A shows the locations of
existing and proposed Stewardship Sending Areas (SSAs) that create the
entitlements for the DRI. The set asides for panther will be established somewhere
within the SSAs, and the exact location, habitat type(s), and extent of the set
asides will be determined via Section 7 consultations with USFWS, and the
concurrence of FWC.
9130f2004-141173 Ver:03!-JeANTREL
-,
03786-013-llOO-PDSS.26753
'Be
... ...
... '..t
Question 13: Wetlands
SWFRPC:
When will the pending wetland determination shown on Map F-2 be
determined?
Response: A jurisdictional wetland field review request will be filed with SFWMD
on October 1, 2004. Please note that all wetlands shown as "pending" on Map F-2
are separated from non-hydric agricultural land by berms and ditches, and their
extents are clearly identifiable in the field. Changes to the mapped wetland areas
are therefore unlikely.
SFWMD:
The response to Question 13.A.2 indicates that it is difficult to quantify wet
season water table elevations due to the absence of hydrobiological
indicators and the variability of pumping schedules. Does the ongoing
agricultural operation maintain any water stage records on the project
site? If not, staff recommends that peizometers be installed and
monitored in selected wetlands, particularly the larger wetlands. Also, the
response to Question 19.A indicates that hydrobiological indicators were
used to establish control elevations. Were these indicators limited to
Camp Keais Strand?
Response: The agricultural operations do not maintain water stage records
onsite. Individual fields are managed to provide proper water levels for irrigation
and drainage, which varies from field to field on a day-to-day basis.
Auto-recording water-table wells have been installed in the following wetlands
(see Map F-2): Wetlands 3, 10, 16, 18, 22, 25, and 33. Additionally, wells have been
placed just upstream and downstream of the two outfalls to Camp Keais Strand, in
the water retention area between Wetlands 24 and 30 Oust outside the DRI
boundary), and in the large wetland to the southwest of Wetland 30 (also outside
the DRI boundary). A few other wells are scattered widely throughout agricultural
areas within the DRI, to provide data for contouring water-table elevations across
the entire DRI site.
The hydrobiological indicators used for establishment of control elevations were
determined only within Camp Keais Strand. As noted, hydrobiological indicators
onsite are often absent, poorly defined, or confused due to agricultural pumping.
The data quality for onsite hydrobiological indicators can therefore be
characterized as poor to very poor. In contrast, the Camp Keais hydrobiological
data showed excellent correlation with SFWMD stage gage data at the Immokalee
and Oil Well Road bridges. These indicators were field-verified by Mr. Ross Morton
of SFWMD on June 22, 2004. A third set of consistent indicators were established
at the Camp Keais outfall structure due west of Wetland 23. A report detailing the
hydobiological indicators, stage gage data, and site conditions was submitted to
SFWMD as part of RAI #3 on July 14. 2004. The excellent stage data for Camp
Keais Strand. combined with water-table well data from the DRI site, provide a
thorough database for stormwater design.
SFWMD:
The response to Question 13.B states that "plans are not finalized to the
degree detailed plans for wetland enhancement/recreation are available".
91'3012004-141773 Ver:03!_JCANTREL
-,
037B6-013-00J-PDSS-28753
The mention of created wetlands may be problematic. Please submit
more detailed plans that address exotic species management, buffers,
and the critical interaction of mitigation areas with the proposed surface
water management system design. Where in the range of the proposed
basin control elevations (19' to 22' NGVD) will the preserved wetlands
exist?
",. '. .
. 8 C"I
Response: Detailed mitigation plans clearly fall within the ERP application and
review process, and will be addressed fully at that time. The mention of "wetland
enhancement/recreation" was a broad description used only in the context of the
lack of a detailed plan at this time. Only wetland enhancement/restoration
activities are generally considered for onsite mitigation; no conversion of uplands
to created wetlands is planned. All the requested details will be provided once the
design is complete and the ERP is filed.
SFWMD:
Are the thousands of acres of wetlands to be protected by incorporation
into Stewardship Sending Areas (as referenced in the ADA) those that are
shown on Map A? These areas appear to be strategically located so as to
provide a good location for the proposed mitigation. However, the ADA
did not include sufficient details for staff to adequately review the
proposed mitigation. Please submit more definitive information regarding
the proposed mitigation activities.
Response: Yes, the SSAs shown on Map A as existing, pending and proposed
are the ones referenced. We concur that they are strategically located and contain
large areas of wetland that may be incorporated into future mitigation plans.
As noted in a sufficiency question below, the Uniform Mitigation Assessment
Method (UMAM) scoring will be needed for all closely linked and causally related
off-site wetland impacts and mitigation areas as part of the ERP application. While
we understand the desire for more definitive mitigation plans, they are simply not
yet prepared and speculation on such details is premature prior to the filing and
review of the overall ERP application.
SFWMD:
Preserving only 62 of 439 acres of wetlands appears to miss some
opportunities for avoiding wetland impacts. Although the difficulty of
preserving small, fragmented wetlands is understood, some of the
peripheral wetlands (e.g.. 21, 22, and 23) appear to be strong candidates
for avoidance and enhancement. Please discuss design alternatives that
were considered to reduce and/or eliminate the proposed wetland
impacts.
Response: The Town of Ave Maria DRI boundary was carefully selected to
exclude all high quality major wetland systems in the vicinity, particularly those
outside of the existing agricultural drainage perimeter berms. This is clearly
evident by tracing the western boundary of the DRI as shown on Map F-2. The DRI
boundary only encompasses isolated wetlands, many of which are pastures,
former row-crop fields, and other highly disturbed areas.
Wetlands 21, 22, and 23 represent some of the most altered and/or exotic-infested
wetlands onsite. A review of Map E reveals that these areas occur on soils mapped
913012004-141773 Ver 03!_JCANTREL
-
037llEi-{J1J..OOO-POSS-28753
-Be
as Immokalee fine sand, which is considered a non-hydric soil map unit. These
areas were subject to historical clearing and altered hydrology as agricultural
drainage patterns changed over time. Wetlands 21 and 22 currently display clear
signs of altered hydrology due to the existing agricultural drainage, including a
high proportion of upland vegetation such as saw palmetto, rusty Iyonia, high bush
blueberry, beautiful paw-paw, etc. Wetland 23 is comprised of either dense
Brazilian pepper monoculture or areas with minimal native canopy and >75
percent Brazilian pepper cover, a result of historical clearing.
The proposed wetland impacts depicted are based on a conceptual level DRI
Master Plan. The actual extent and location of specific wetland impacts will be
determined through state and federal permitting processes. Further review of
avoidance and minimization will occur at that time.
SFWMD:
Table 21-6 lists a number of road widening projects and new roads that
are closely linked and causally related to the Ave Maria project. Please
be advised that these roadway projects will be considered part of the
project in the ERP application. Please provide an accounting of wetland
impacts associated with the proposed roadway improvements. In
addition, please address how wildlife movement will be facilitated across
or under these roads. Is there a projected time-line for construction of
these roads? Has there been any consideration of mitigation to offset
anticipated wetland impacts?
Response: Table 21-6 lists roadway improvements that were programmed and
committed to by Collier County as part of the County's three-year work program in
the Collier County AUIR and the FDOT's Adopted Work Program for Collier
County. The need for these improvements, the decisions on their priority and
implementation, and any permitting issues related thereto are completely
independent from this DRI and the applicant's control, and have no bearing
whatsoever on this DRI. The purpose for identifying these improvements in the
ADA is the fact that they can be relied upon as being programmed and committed
for the purpose of our transportation analysis pursuant to the approved
methodology. The applicant therefore respectfully and firmly disagrees with the
assertion that they are closely linked or causally related to the DRI. There is no
basis to consider these projects as part of the ERP application for this project, nor
is there any basis to ask this applicant to account for wetland impacts or other
environmental or scheduling issues.
SFWMD:
Please provide Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) scores
for the on-site wetlands, pursuant to Rule 62-345, FAC. Please be
advised that UMAM scoring will be needed for all closely linked and
causally related off-site wetland impacts and mitigation areas as part of
the ERP application.
Response: UMAM scores will be provided as they become available during the
ERP process, as they are scored and reviewed by SFWMD staff.
SFWMD:
1l{3012004-141773 Var: 031-JCANTREL
-,
03786-013-OOCl-PDSS-26753
The ADA did not include sufficient information/documentation concerning
listed wildlife species. Please submit documentation from the appropriate
wildlife agencies indicating that the proposed project will not result in any
adverse impacts to listed wetland dependent wildlife species.
Response: Detailed listed species information has been provided to FWC. The
applicant is currently engaged in discussions with FWC and will provide
appropriate documentation as the consultation progresses.
Separately, under the federal review process, USFWS is currently performing a
review of the DRI and associated wildlife compensation. Issuance of a Biological
Opinion for the DRI is expected to track with the DRI review process.
913012004-141773 Ver. 03!_JCANTREL
-,
037ll6-013-000-POSS.28753
7'ac
rac
Question 14: Water
SFWMD:
Although the response to Question 14.A contains substantial information
regarding existing ground water conditions, there is a lack of information
regarding existing surface water conditions.
Response: The only surface water located within the DRI boundary is farm field
swales and seasonal wetlands. Please refer to Map 1-1 for details.
SFWMD:
The response to Question 14.A indicates that the proposed withdrawals or
potable supply and landscape irrigation will be less than the agricultural
withdrawals currently permitted. Is there available data that indicates
actual agricultural use in the project area? Is the permitted use for
seasonal crops or citrus?
Response: Monthly pumpage data is submitted to the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) on a monthly basis by the farmers. Pumpage data
should be available from the SFWMD Post Permit Compliance.
The maximum monthly allocation is based on the supplemental crop requirement
for tomatoes (Permit 11-000261-W), small vegetables and avocados (Permit 11-
000216-W).
1lI3012004.141773 VefC 03\. JCANTREL
,-,
03786-013-DOO-POSS.26753
~8C
Question 17: Water Supplv
SWFRPC:
Table 17 -A 1 shows that the entire 5.8 MGD of non-potable water demand
will be met using reclaimed wastewater generated within the DR!. The
applicant states that the initial irrigation demands will be generated
through groundwater supply until there is enough reclaimed wastewater
generated to meet the need. Once there is enough reclaimed water
generated, will the wells be capped? If the wells are not capped, couldn't
groundwater be used to supplement irrigation demands after reclaimed
water sources come online? If so. shouldn't the calculations include some
non-potable water coming from groundwater sources?
Response: Wells will not be capped. Groundwater wells will remain in place to
supplement irrigation demands when needed. Calculations quantifying
supplemental water needs cannot be made at this time because the amount of
irrigation water demand vs. reclaimed water supply is not known.
SWFRPC:
The applicant discusses the future use of reclaimed water to meet
irrigation demands for the project. The response to Question 17 -A. 2
mentions that groundwater will be used until the Town increases to the
point of generating enough reclaimed water to meet the Town's irrigation
demands. Does this mean that the reclaimed water will not come online
until all the irrigation demands can be met? Is there a minimum threshold
level that can be set so that some reclaimed water can be used early on
while the town grows with the goal of eventually phasing out the use of
groundwater supplies?
Response: The reclaimed water system will be available as soon as reclaimed
water flows are generated. The initial wastewater treatment plant will be above the
FDEP threshold for reclaimed water systems. The goal is to utilize 100% ofthe
reclaimed water generated for irrigation use. Groundwater wells will remain in
place to supplement irrigation demands when needed.
SWFRPC:
Please show the locations of the wells within the proposed wellfield as
required by Question 17 -C.
Response: Figure 17C-1, which shows the proposed locations exi!)ting
groundwater wells for agricultural use, was provided with the original ADA
submittal. In regards to proposed groundwater wells for the use of potable water
supply or development irrigation, these locations have not yet been determined.
This development will utilize existing wells for the purposes of potable water
supply and irrigation lake recharge. If an existing well needs relocation to be
utilized for these purposes, a permit modification application will be submitted to
the SFWMD for approval prior to construction.
9/30/2004- 141773 Vel': 031- JCANTREL
,-,
03786-013-QOo-PDSS-28753
:o8C
..,..,...,'
Question 18: Wastewater Manaaement
SFWMD:
The response to this question indicates that wastewater treatment will
occur onsite. Storage of excess effluent may be a problem and there is
no mention of this issue in the ADA. Landscape irrigation using reclaimed
water may not be adequate to address the disposal issue.
Response: Excess effluent will be stored in on-site lakes in accordance with
FDEP rules. Because FDEP requires 100% backup disposal capacity, rapid
infiltration basins (percolation ponds) or other FDEP-approved disposal alternative
will be provided when effluent cannot be used for irrigation (land application).
913012004_141773 Ver. 03!- JCANTREL
-,
031B6-01:i-OOO-PDSS-28753
118C
Question 19: Surface Water Manaaement
SFWMD:
The response to SWFRPC Addendum Question #1 indicates that the
water quality volume required within each of the developed basins will be
the greater of one-inch of run-off over the entire basin area of one-inch of
run off over the entire basin area or 2.5 times the impervious percentage.
Please be advised that the proposed project will discharge to
sensitive/impaired/Outstanding Florida Waters downstream and additional
water quality treatment may be required to insure these waters are not
adversely impacted.
Response: Stormwater run-off from this development receives water quality
treatment, as referenced in the initial application, via wet and dry detention, within
the developed footprint of the DRI. The discharge from the development surface
water management system then receives additional treatment as it is conveyed
along existing farm canals to the existing permitted farm stormwater storage
reservoirs, prior to discharge to offsite systems. Please note that stormwater
discharge from these reservoirs does not discharge directly to any
sensitivelimpaired/Outstanding Florida Waters. From these points of discharge
there is significant distance and travel time for stormwater discharges associated
with this project to reach any sensitivelimpaired/Outstanding Florida Water via
sheet flow.
These storage reservoirs are noted in Map I as "Existing Farm Detention Areas".
The existing farm detention areas consist of large, vegetated areas which are
bermed to a sufficient height to create a reservoir to store stormwater run-off from
the farmed areas. Discharges from these detention areas to the off-site receiving
body are controlled by culverts in the berms. This additional water quality
treatment is not typical with most developments, and is unique to this particular
situation of developing a town within an existing farm surface water management
system. Rather than removing these reservoirs as development replaces farming
operations, these systems can be left in-place to provide additional water quality
treatment. These details of the surface water management system design will be
determined during the Environmental Resource Permit process for the DRI
development.
Additional water quality treatment, if required, will be determined during the
Environmental Resource Permit process for the DRI development.
SWFMD:
Based on ERP Application #030910-14, please be advised that finished
floor elevations for all buildings should meet or exceed the 100-year/3 day
storm event with zero discharge criteria.
Response: Noted. Finished floor elevations for habitable structures will be set
in conformance with SFWMD criteria. FEMA and applicable building codes.
9f.l0l2004-141713 Ver: 031-JCANTREL
CAlJ.IJ
03786-013..()OO-POSS-28753
fee
Question 20: Solid/Hazardous/Medical Waste
SWFRPC:
If commercial operations with extremely hazardous chemicals are located
onsite, will facilities with these types of substances be equipped with
chemical sensors, internal alarm systems. or emergency shutdown
systems? Would the applicant be willing to include Restrictive Covenants,
a provision requiring hotel and commercial pool operations using chlorine
to be equipped with sensors or alarm devices?
Response: If commercial operations with extremely hazardous chemicals are
located onsite, they will be required to comply with Collier County's current
requirements. According to the Collier County Health Department staff, chlorine
gas for commercial pools has not been used over the past ten years. The
applicant feels that Collier County's current codes adequately address the issue
and a Restrictive Covenant is not warranted.
SWFRPC:
Will any of the commercial or residential developments utilize natural gas
as a source of energy? If so has the local fire department been informed
of these uses or potential emergency response issues that may need to
be addressed?
Response: No. Should natural gas be utilized at some future date, applicable
state and local regulations will be met.
SWFRPC:
What is the proposed number of restaurants and other food preparation
businesses to be located at the development? Given the critical water
issue in this area of Collier County, what provisions are proposed to
ensure state-of-the art grease traps, and responsible management of the
proposed devices?
Response: The number of restaurants is not known at this time. Restaurant
owners will be required to comply with Collier County's grease trap ordinance that
requires routine maintenance of the grease removal system.
SWFRPC:
Please identify the specific types of medical facilities that are anticipated
to locate in the Town of Ave Maria. Additionally, has the applicant
consulted with a licensed Bio-hazardous waste hauler regarding the waste
materials that will likely be generated from the medical facilities?
Response: The applicant has contacted several licensed bio-hazardous waste
haulers that are available to haul and dispose of waste materials that may be
generated from the medical facilities. Several haulers are available to the DRI.
SWFRPC:
Will the proposed Adult Congregate Living Facility likely handle medical or
Bio-hazardous waste?
Response: Yes.
SWFRPC:
9130/2004- 141773 Vel: OO!- JCANTREL
~.,
03786-013-000-PDSS-28153
Please provide a commitment from a licensed Bio-hazardous waste
transporter regarding the transporter's ability to serve the project during a
routine pickup or accidental release.
lraG
Response: A commitment letter from a licensed Bio-hazardous waste transporter
is provided.]
SWFRPC:
Has a plan been developed to handle the project's medical waste, or to
handle an accidental release along the roadways of the development?
How will the project's hazardous waste or waste by-products be
disposed?
Response: The responsibility for disposing medical and hazardous waste lies
with the waste generator in accordance with Florida law (64E-16, F.A.C. for
Biohazardous Waste; 62-730 F.A.C. for hazardous waste). These generators will
be responsible for contracting with properly licensed waste haulers for disposal of
these "special wastes". State regulated private waste haulers are responsible for
their own procedures for accidental release along the roadways.
SWFRPC:
Question B-1 asks about the presence of laboratories. warehouses, and
other locations where hazardous materials may be generated or utilized.
Why is there no discussion of how the University itself will deal with these
issues, especially since there is a discussion of the University's solid
waste generation and recycling? Please include generation estimates for
the University's hazardous + material sites (chemistry labs, etc.).
Response: Using the state-defined limits, the University is considered a
"conditionally exempt small quantity hazardous waste generator." This means
that the University would generate no more than 100 kg (220 pounds)/month and
never store more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste on site at any time. This is
considered as the upper limit. The University probably will generate significantly
less than this, but quantifying the amount at this time would be problematic.
SWFRPC:
Question C-3 asks for a statement of the agency's or firm's ability to
provide service at all times during and after development. The applicant
included a letter from the Immokalee Disposal Company for the hauling of
the materials. Shouldn't there be a letter from Collier County's Solid
Waste Department stating they have room for the solid waste materials,
especially since the applicant states in the response to Question C-1 that
"Collier County's Solid Waste Department indicates that this facility will
have capacity for the next 20 years"?
Response: Information regarding the county's landfill capacity was obtained
verbally during a meeting with landfill representatives.
913012004- 14\773 Ver: OJ!- JCANTREL
-,
037fl6..013.000-POSS-28753
SEP-29-04
13: 12
FROM-Camp Or.".r & McK.. Inc
8132888787
T-161
P002, a7C
.-~AlIstate
,OGUARD
.. ',. ""~, '.A "._~....,__..._
, ._----" ..........-
.-.......-- --
. -. ..- ~ .~ -
.- ..- ." . --- . ~-~
,,~,,_.. ~~w__
-'"-"-~_..- .
~~~...'-- .~."
-- -.. ......-. .-.,
. ...~. ..~.."
. .__ ._.., '. _..._.w
September 27, 2004
Mr: Jason Gorrie
Senior Project Manager
COM
1715 N. Westshore, Suite 875
Tampa, FIoida 33607
Subject:
Town of Ave Maria
Collier County, Florida
Dear Mr. Gorrie:
Our company, Allstate BioGuard Service, Inc. is a licensed biomedical waste traDSporter
located in Collier County, Florida. Our Department of Health Biomedical Waste
registration numbers are #11-64-00468 (storage) & #11--64-00438 (tnmsplrter). As
discussed on the telephone with you last week, Allstate is capable of satisfYing
biomedical waste disposal needs for biomedical waste generators that develop within the
proposed Town of Ave Maria I trust that tbis infonnation is sufficient for YOW" needs.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (239) 598-1003 if additional iIlforma.1ion is
necessary.
v~yyours,
c~Rr
President
Allstate BioGuard Service, Inc.
.-.
L-
~8C
~~
Question 21: Transportation
SWFRPC:
Development parameters depicted in Table 21-1 and 21-7 differ from the
parameters used in the earlier analysis and that are depicted in
"Transportation Appendices" dated July 2004. The discrepancies should
be addressed and the resulting difference in trip generation described.
Response: The parameters contained in the "Transportation Appendices" are the
original parameters submitted as part of the DRI pre-application/methodology
documentation. Following the pre-app/methodology meeting with review agency
staff, several refinements to the parameters were made, the culmination of which
are reflected in the Tables 21-1 and 21-7 of the ADA.
The table in the appendix shows 752,500 square feet of "Retail, Entertainment and
Service." 27,500 square feet of that was re-classified and added to the 121,000
square feet of Miscellaneous and re-named "Civic/Community /Miscellaneous" in
the document. 35,000 square feet of the 752,500 was re-classified and listed
separately as "Medical Clinic" in the document. The estimated number of K-12
students was reduced from 3,900 to 3,100. Using the development parameters
shown in the appendix would have yielded a peak hour trip total of 4,166 versus
the 4,107 on which the analysis was based.
SWFRPC:
An arterial analysis was not conducted for roadway segments that are
significantly and adversely impacted. Improvements that would mitigate
the impact were not identified.
Response: Future operating conditions on all significantly impacted roadway
segments are shown in Tables 21-14 and 21-15. As agreed to in the methodology
meeting, level of service is not described by a letter grade (A through F) because
Collier County does not publish level of service threshold volumes for anything
but the minimum standard level of service, which are provided in the Annual
Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Adversely impacted segments are those in
the tables whose V/C ratios are above 1.0. They occur throughout the table
because the segments are listed in alphabetical order. Improvements that will
mitigate the impacts are shown in Tables 21-18 and 21-19.
SWFRPC:
Certain intersections show a need for improvement in the A.M. period;
while the analysis is typically performed for the P.M. Peak Hour,
improvements for the A.M. period should also be described.
Response: There are no intersection analyses in the document that describe
operating conditions in the AM Peak period. That absence was agreed on in the
methodology meeting.
FOOT:
913012004- 141773 Vec_ 03!- JCANTREL
-,
03786-013-000-PDSS-28753
Level of Service Analysis: The output for the SYNCHRO LOS analysis,
contained in the Transportation Appendices, is for the version using the
SYNCHRO equation. This version does not contain some input data such
as the percent of heavy vehicles. The LOS analysis output should be the
HCM version that does contain these input fields.
~,..
Be
15
Response: Analysis by SYNCHRO was agreed on in the methodology meeting.
The purpose of the methodology meeting is to establish the parameters of the
analysis. The proposed analysis method was outlined in a pre-application
document, sent to all reviewing agencies. Additional issues discussed at the
methodology meeting were summarized in a supplementary pre-application report
dated May 25, 2004. FDOT neither participated in the methodology meeting nor
commented on either of the pre-application documents.
The analyses contained in the application could have easily utilized different
parameters if any of the participants invited to the methodology meeting had
required them. To perform an additional analysis now using different parameters
would yield two sets of results. One would be consistent with the methodology
agreed on by all agencies that provided comments at the pre-application stage.
The second would not. If any agency wishes to perform alternate analyses they
are of course free to do so.
Analyses of conditions twelve years in the future are based on many projections
that all contain margins of error surrounding the actual value used as input into
the analysis. If adjustments to secondary parameters yield changes to results that
are significantly smaller than the margin of error surrounding those basic
projections, then they should rightly be considered as more appropriate for
adjustment at the design stage.
All SYNCHRO files were provided on CD ROM as part of the ADA submittal, and
alternate reporting options available in SYNCHRO can be reviewed by opening the
files in SYNCHRO.
FOOT:
No arterial analysis was conducted. An arterial analysis for the years 2011
and 2016 should be provided for all State Highway Systems (SHS),
including 1-75.
Response: Future operating conditions on all significantly impacted roadway
segments, including all arterial roads, are shown in Tables 21-14 and 21-15. As
agreed on in the methodology meeting. level of service is not described by a letter
grade (A through F) because Collier County does not publish level of service
threshold volumes for anything but the minimum standard level of service, which
are provided in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Adversely
impacted segments are those in the tables whose V/C ratios are above 1.0. They
occur throughout the table because the segments are listed in alphabetical order.
FOOT:
Traffic Signal Cycle lengths: Traffic signal cycle lengths for intersections
on the SHS (not at 1-75), and on 2-lane facilities, should be a minimum of
90 seconds in length. Where the SHS roadway is a multi-lane facility, or at
ramp-terminal intersections at 1-75, the LOS analysis should be conducted
using a 120 second signal cycle length.
Response: The cycle lengths shown in the analyses provide optimal average
delay. No comments received on proposed methodology prescribed cycle lengths.
See above comments on input parameters.
913012004-141173 Ver. 03!-JCANTREL
-,
0318&-013-000--PDSS-28153
FDOT:
16 8 C
,-"'/;'.1
Minimum Initial Green Time for Signalized Intersections: Several of the
LOS Analyses on the SHS used minimum initial green times that are too
short. The FOOT guidelines for the development of traffic signal operation
should be used to determine minimum initial green times for intersections
on the SHS.
Response: Minimum initial green times were provided by Collier County, the
maintaining agency for all of the signals analyzed. See above comments on input
parameters.
FOOT:
Percent of Heavy Vehicle Traffic: The LOS analysis does not show what
percentage was used for heavy vehicles in the traffic stream. If data on
the percentage of heavy vehicles is not available from the traffic counts,
then a default value of 5% should be used on all SHS facilities.
Response: The percent heavy vehicles assumed in the analyses, though not
shown in the reports, was two percent. No comments received on the proposed
methodology prescribed heavy vehicle percentages. See above comments on
input parameters.
FOOT:
Peak Hour Factor (PH F): A value of 0.92 was used in all LOS analyses.
The actual PHF for each movement, determined from the current traffic
volume turning movement counts. should be used in the 2004 analysis.
For the year 2011, the PHF should be determined as follows: PHF (2011)
= Existing PHF + 0.92 I 2. For the year 2016. a PHF of 0.92 is
satisfactory .
Response: Applying peak hour factors to individual movements can result in
mixing fifteen minute flows that occurred at different times within the peak hour
(e.g. combining the EBL flow that occurred in the first fifteen minutes with the EBT
flow that occurred in the last fifteen minutes), hardly representative of actual
operating conditions. Regardless, the chief goal of the analysis is in identifying
future deficiencies, an analysis for which current peak hour factors are
inappropriate. A uniform PHF of 0.92 is conservative at urbanized intersections.
Further debate on the issue is more suitable for the review stage of the application
process. See above comments on input parameters.
FOOT:
Queue Length Analysis: The queue lengths provided by the SYNCHRO
analysis are not sufficiently accurate for use on the SHS. Where any
signalized vehicle movement on the SHS is shown to operate at less than
LOS C, the queue length for that movement should be calculated using
the FOOT Plans Preparation Manual (PPM) method. This queue length
should be added to the deceleration and taper length for turn lanes
defined by DOT Standard Index 301, and the total required turn lane
length determined. If this length is greater than the existing turn lane
length, then an improvement should be identified.
Response: Use of SYNCHRO was agreed on in the methodology meeting. Design
of any required improvements on the State Highway System will of course be in
accordance with the FDOT's Plans Preparation Manual. The analysis presented in
the document is not meant to substitute for the design process that follows much
later. See above comments on input parameters.
9f3012Q04..141773 Ver:03!-JCANTREL
,~
0378l3-01J..OOO.PDS5-28753
FOOT:
17 8 C
Traffic Impact Mitigation: LOS analyses were conducted only for the PM
peak hour, and intersection improvements needs are shown only for the
PM peak hour. However, at some intersections. it appears that
improvements in the AM peak hours may be needed. Where the
analyses show the need for intersection improvements on the SHS in the
PM peak hour, the AM peak hour should also be analyzed to determine if
improvements are required.
Response: There are no intersection analyses in the document that describe
operating conditions in the AM Peak period. That absence was agreed on in the
methodology meeting.
MPO:
The development parameters shown in Tables 21-1 and 21-7 differ from
those that are included in the Ave Maria DRI ADA "Transportation
Appendices" dated July 2004. The applicant should confirm that the traffic
analysis is based on the parameters shown in Tables 21 and 21-7. and
not those included in the Transportation Appendices.
Response: The traffic analyses are based on the development parameters shown
in Tables 21-1 and 21-7.
MPO:
The applicant should clarify that the peak-hour of the DRI is consistent
with the traditional weekday P.M. Peak Period that is typically evaluated
for Concurrency purposes. Of particular concern is the impact the
proposed civic/community and retail/entertainment facilities will have on
the adjacent street network, during peak periods for the generators. At a
minimum, the P.M. Peak Period should be expanded to encompass the
hours between 3 P.M. and 6 P.M.
Response: The project traffic volumes used in the analysis are based on the ITE
trip generation rates for the 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. period. No data exists for a PM peak
period that begins at 3 p.m. ITE does provide trip generation rates for the peak
hour of the generator, but they do not indicate when that peak hour is. Peak
generation rates of significant civic/community uses will of course be used for the
design of turn lanes at the entrances, but chief concern of the analysis provided is
the performance of arterial streets in the period agreed on in the methodology
meeting: that is the period from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.
MPO:
Table 21-8 shows that ITE Trip Generation Manua/ Code 820 (Shopping
Center) has been assumed for the shopping/personal service/
entertainment and medical office uses that were evaluated within the DR!.
The applicant should list the discrete uses that are planned and analyze
the trip rate, distribution and peaks accordingly, using the appropriate ITE
land use codes. It is our judgment that such an approach will more
appropriately reflect the particular traffic characteristics of the DR!.
Response: The discrete uses, and the amount of square footage devoted to each,
are unknown at this time. What is known is that, in the aggregate, the range of
uses will be similar in nature to the range of uses found within a shopping center.
913Q(2()()4- 14ln3 Ver. 03!- JCANTREL
,-,
03186-013-OOO-PDSS-2B753
MPO:
lr'SC
The proposed 62% Internal Capture Rate for the DRI is extremely high
and exceeds typical accepted industry thresholds. The primary reasons
for our concern are as follows:
.
Although most Ave Maria University (AMU) students will live on campus, t
is unlikely that they will have to leave the DRI to access traditional
discount retail centers such as Wal-Mart and Target (e.g., due to lower
student incomes) and other entertainment opportunities in the Naples and
Fort Myers areas_
.
Internal Capture Rates could be less, depending on which peak periods
are evaluated for the proposed uses.
.
The proposed retail/entertainment uses could very well make Ave Maria a
destination like Winter Park Village or other high-end "lifestyle centers".
drawing non-resident and non-employee trips from throughout the
Southwest Florida region.
The applicant should propose a specific monitoring program and mitigation
selection process that can be pursued if external traffic exceeds the levels
assumed in the ADA. Due to the projected number of trips that could be
generated by the DRI, perhaps these programs could be stricter than those
already permitted through the Substantial Deviation process.
Response: Although the validity of such opinions may be questionable, these are
all matters suitable for discussion during the review stage of the application
process.
Question 21-F (Necessary Network Modifications):
MPO:
MPO staff was unable to find any detailed segment capacity analyses for
the adversely and significantly impacted segment of Interstate 75 between
Immokalee Road and Bonita Beach Road. The applicant should include
such an analysis, which could identify mitigation measures above and
beyond a six-Ianing project. The MPO staff is also concerned about the
future operations of and mitigation measures that have been proposed so
far for the Interstate 75/lmmokalee Road interchange. This should be
discussed with the applicant during the ADA review/approval phase.
Response: Future operating conditions on all significantly impacted roadway
segments are shown in Tables 21-14 and 21-15. As agreed on in the methodology
meeting, level of service is not described by a letter grade (A through F) because
Collier County does not publish level of service threshold volumes for anything
but the minimum standard level of service. For 1-75, the service volumes are taken
from the FDOT's Generalized Service Volume Tables. Appropriate mitigation
measures are matters suitable for discussion during the review stage of the
application process
Question 21-H (Provisions for Alternative Modes):
MPO:
9/J0I2Q04.- 141773 Ver: 031_JCANTREL
,-,
03786-013-000-POSS-2B753
A map should be included in the submittal that illustrates a defined
bicycle/pedestrian network within the DRI. In addition to meeting the
198C
ji'~M <
requirements of Collier County's Land Development Code, we would like to
work with the applicant to incorporate the proposed "FPL Trail" (Orange
River to East Naples) into the design of the project. Attached is a location
map that includes a potential alternative alignment for this multi-use
pathway. If the alternative alignment through Ave Maria is acceptable, the
FPL Trail would provide a direct connection between the DRI and CREW
Trust trail network and Collier County parks facility that are being
developed on the west side of Immokalee Road (near the Fairgrounds) at
separate sites. If the applicant has not already done so, we would
encourage them to contact Ellen Lindblad (CREW Trust 239-657-2253)
and Amanda Townsend (Collier Parks and Recreation (239-353-0404) to
obtain additional information.
Response: Ave Maria is designed to encourage walking and bicycling. In addition
to the street system that is designed at low speeds with sidewalks on both sides, a
trail system will link the neighborhoods, schools, parks and commercial areas. A
proposed "Trail System Map" is provided that illustrates a proposed trail system,
which may be refined after discussions with County staff. The applicant supports
the concept of bicycle facilities connecting the Town to Immokalee and the Naples
Urban Area. The applicant has discussed the issue with county staff and is willing
to participate in further discussions concerning a rural trail system.
MPO:
Collier Area Transit's (CAT) Blue Route offers daily fixed-route service
between Naples and Immokalee via Immokalee Road (attached). This
route should be illustrated on a map within the submittal package. As Ave
Maria develops. it is entirely possible that the Blue Route or other transit
service could be configured to serve the DRI. CA T's potential to reduce
student/resident/employee trips on the study area roadway network should
be analyzed in this ADA.
.
The following transit-oriented mitigation measures could be pursued to
offset external trips particularly trips generated beyond the amount
assumed in the ADA:
(1) Purchase of buses and/or payment of operational costs for
routes(s) to the DRI from Naples and/or Immokalee (including
payment of contingency cost
(2) Development of ridesharing or other transportation demand
management programs for Ave Maria if transit usage exceeds
capacity in the future.
Funding for transit services could also be derived from such sources as
an "activity fee" that is paid by AMU students each semester, much like is
done at the University of Florida in support of Gainesville's transit system.
Please contact Elizabeth Suchsland with Collier Area Transit (phone:
239-596-7777) to discuss in greater detail.
Response: The applicant supports the concept of transit availability to students
and town residents and has initiated discussions with appropriate County staff. If
the county provides service with two buses within the peak hour, carrying forty
passengers per bus, and fifty percent choice riders aboard, there should be
reduction of forty external peak hour trips. The more favorable any of those
component projections become, the more conservative the peak hour external
913012004.141773 Ver 03!- JCANTREL
-.
031ll&-013-000-PDSS-28153
traffic projections become, and consequently the analyses on which they are
based.
913012004-141773 Ver.03!_JCANTREL
-,
03786-013-IJOO-PDSS-28753
20Be
,
.
!
,
o
"
"
"
"
.II
.11
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
I
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
'0
)>
s:
'U
,
~
WRA
HSA
WRA
o
HSA
o
FSA
HSA
HSA
R
R
I
I
" ^
'( :: m
"
:: )>
"
:: UJ
"
"
"
\: ;0
:: 0
:)>
:0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
o ::
"
"
"
"
II
II
II
"
"
II
II
"
"
___________________________JL_____________
FSA
WRA
R
o
,
,
\
\
I
I
----------------------------______1______-------------_______________________
HSA
-----------------------------------------------------CfI-L---VV-E-Li----Ff()A-D----------------------------~~-------------
DRI LAND USE SUMMARY :1
I AMU I UNIVERSITY I SCHOOLS
CD RESIDENTIAL
IT] MIXED USE
1;,:11I COMMUNITY FACILITY
I ' VI ,.1 WETLAND PRESERVE
[}] PARK
~ LAKE PARKS
995 AC
2.921 AC
61 AC
OFF-SITE RLSA DESIGNATIONS
I FSA I
IWRA I
I HS/< I
~ RLSA OPEN
_ TRAil SYSTEM'
RlSA FLOWWAY STEWARDSHIP AREA
328 AC
211 AC
RLSA WATER RETENTION AREA
62 AC
RLSA HABITAT STEWARDSHIP AREA
175 AC
..... ROADWAYS
242 AC
..... ORI BOUNDARY
4,995 AC
o 1,000 2.000
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
4,000' ~
,V
NORTH
..Ol~; uo.ow UlllO (;l.,O.~lIlFI(;P,T'ONij Mft)Al;I<CAlOl>" ijl1QWH AllUYl< MAY Itl(;lW~ INTtiHNAl
STRl!EU'. lAIU'Il, OPIlN8I"Ac.Ei, ANPOTHl!R 8Uf'PC>IlTlNI'IUftI!II,
w
[
it' ~
:::~N
':b11
- ~ .
U
.'
.
PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
s ~
ii: 3"
o 0 ~
II!
Wil.Mil'.r
"""_'~'Eo%fiJII.IumJM
~~,.. .~con.lIlII.$
WIJIonMUI<<,lnc.
N.-' 'Mil,.. .lMIN/Io,"""""",.r_.I'IIlIIIIuM.,."...
J...,.,.-....IH........FIoIllIIUlffMl1
,... '........,llIlI. ,,. tJUOI1lf
E_a ~..............._ . IIIflIoIHo _.,......-
,
,
"
0"
..
~
PREPARED FOR: NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT, LLLP
218C
.,,~~I~
Question 24: Affordable Housina
SWFRPC:
The applicant's commitments regarding this issue and more specific
commitments for the range of housing in order to be able to claim such
high internal traffic capture rates. Is the work force discussion for this new
Town ccnsistent with these capturing rates?
Response: The applicant's analysis of housing is consistent with the
anticipated internal traffic capture rate. The planning for the Town has taken into
consideration its relatively remote location from the coastal urban area, its
proximity to Immokalee and the eastern Golden Gate Estates, the anticipated
demand for housing to support the faculty, staff, and administrative employees of
Ave Maria University, and the non-University employment created by other
businesses in the Town. Because of the unique location and demographic
attributes of the Town and its major employer being a University, the anticipated
wage scale is significantly higher than Collier County averages. In Collier County,
high wage employment is defined as 115% ofthe annual average private sector
wage, and equates to an annual salary of $35,643 or more. While roughly 73% of
the total countywide employment falls below this level according to the OES for
Collier County, the opposite is true within the Town, with an estimated 74% of the
employment as shown on Table10.3.A-2 at or above the County's high wage level.
With respect to housing needs within the Town, as previously noted, the
University faculty and staff will be able to select from a full range of housing
options throughout the Town, depending on family size and lifestyle preferences.
The same holds true for employees of other businesses that will be established in
the Town. Because of the reasonable home pricing expected in the Town, we
anticipate an adequate supply of housing for the majority of people choosing to
live in the Town.
The applicant estimates that approximately 1000 owner-occupied units within the
Town will be priced so as to be affordable to moderate income households, with
the understanding that both housing prices and wages increase over time. The
supply of moderate-income level housing in the Town is expected to meet or
exceed the demand created within the Town, however it is important to remember
that many employees will be drawn from the existing workforce already residing in
the area, and other new employees will choose to live elsewhere. Furthermore, one
of the many needs that exist in the Immokalee area is an increased supply of
middle income housing, as many such employees in Immokalee now reside in
communities such as Lehigh Acres and Orangetree and must commute due to the
lack of availability in Immokalee, and the Town of Ave Maria is seen as a new
option.
To accommodate low-income wage earners, The Town of Ave Maria includes 1000
apartment units and it is estimated that 60% of these, or 600 units will fall within
the low-income household range of affordability.
As previously stated, the applicant is already working with providers of such
housing and will be bringing forward specific solutions to the Board of County
Commissioners as part of the final review of the DRI Development Order. Offsite
housing solutions may include assisting not-for-profit entities with site acquisition
and possible alliances with for-profit work force housing providers in the area. The
913012004.141773 Ver-:03!-JCANTREL
-,
03786-{113-000-PDSS_2B753
zrsc
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council has identified this negotiated
solution with the local government as an acceptable option and is the one that the
applicant has chosen.
As has been previously noted, Collier Area Transit will include regular routes
between Immokalee and Ave Maria to enable this alternative use of public
transportation for employees in the Town.
913012004-141773 Verc03!.JCANTREL
-,
037B6-013.000.PDSS_28753
;380
Question 25: Police and Fire Protection
SWFRPC:
The applicant notes that the project will have both commercial and
residential uses. Please discuss what measures will be taken to ensure
that adequate fire flow will be available to the project? Have any
discussions taken place with the Immokalee Fire District regarding the
water pressure or water lines that will be needed at specific commercial or
residential locations?
Response: The fire flows required for this project will be provided through the
potable water distribution system. Adequate system storage and pumping
capacity at the water plant site will be installed to provide the required flows.
Distribution system pipes will be sized to deliver the fire flows to the building to
meet the requirements of the NFPA. Several meeting have occurred with
representatives from the Immokalee Fire District regarding fire flows. The
applicant is addressing this local design issue as appropriate.
SWFRPC:
The application did not provide any indications that the Collier County
Emergency Medical Services has the capacity to serve the project.
Please provide a letter of commitment regarding the County's EMS
department ability to serve the project.
Response: Attached please find a letter from Jeff Page, EMS Director, dated June
8,2004, regarding providing EMS service to the University and Town.
SWFRPC:
What is the current response time for emergency medical services
personnel to the property as estimated by Collier County Emergency
Medical Services?
Response: According to Jeff Page, Collier County EMS Director, the response
time to the site would be six minutes or less from the current EMS substation. The
helicopter from Naples would be on site in 15 to 20 minutes. provided there was a
suitable area to land.
SWFRPC:
What will be the response time to a high priority call by the Sheriff's Office
enforcement personnel? Will the University house its own Police and Fire
Departments?
Response: According to Captain Jim Bloom, Patrol and Special Operations
Division of the Collier County Sheriffs Office, the response time to a high priority
call to the Town of Ave Maria would be approximately six minutes or less.
The University will not house its own fire and police departments. Fire and police
protection services will initially be provided by temporary facilities located within
the town, and ultimately by the permanent fire and police protection personnel and
facilities to be located within the community facilities district as indicated on the
master plan.
9130/2004-141773 Ver:03I.JCANTREL
~-
03786-013-000-PDSS_28753
zl8C
The University plans to provide on-campus security 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
This service will be provided by either an in-house security staff or by a licensed
security service. On-campus foot. bicycle and vehicle patrols will be utilized. On-
campus security personnel will coordinate their efforts with the Collier County
Sheriff's Department.
SWFRPC:
Assuming that only Sheriffs or security personnel will be in the Town of
Ave Maria. will any foot security patrol be utilized at the University? If
there is a decision to utilize security personnel, will the security personnel
provide security to the entire town?
Response: The on-campus security provider will utilize foot patrols at the
University. It is not anticipated that the on-campus security personnel will provide
security service for the town. The Collier County Sheriff's Department will provide
police protection for the town. A permanent Sheriff's substation is planned within
the community facilities district of the project.
SWFRPC:
Has the applicant consulted with the Sheriffs Department regarding
security measures and features that will likely deter criminal activity at the
University or commercial sites?
Response: The applicant is coordinating with the Sheriff's Department regarding
providing police protection to the project and continues to have ongoing
discussion with the Sheriff's staff to discuss crime prevention and traffic safety
issues. As development of the project progresses, the applicant will continue to
coordinate with the Sheriff's Department on providing security measures and
features that will likely deter criminal activity at the University and the Town.
913012004-141773 Ver:03!-JCANTREL
~.,
03766-0l3..(lQ(l..PDSS-2B753
09/07/2004 09:30
977544549
EMS
r&02
,.'...
COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
3301 East Tamlaml Trail . Bldg H . Naples, Florida 34112 . (239) 774-8459 . Fax (239) 775-4454
June 8, 2004
Mr. John C. English, P.E.
Project Manager
Associate
SUBJECT: Ave Maria Town and University
Se,rvice Avail~bi1ity Request Reply
Dear Mr. Eni;lish,
Per your request this correspondence will serve as the Letter of Service Availability
in response to your attached request.
Collier County Emergency Medical Services provides first response Advanced Life
Support (ALS) transport for the subject Project Ave Maria Town and University and the
entire 2,200 square miles of Collier County. We currently staff 20 Advanced Life
Support amblllancesand I helicopter to provide 24-hollr coverage for aU emergency
medical incidents.
We have been involved in the planning of a proposed Emergency Facility on the subject
property that would be occupied by Collier County EMS, the Collier County Sheriffs
, Department and the Immokalee Fire Department
Please contact me at your convenience if we may be of additional. service to you.
Sincerely,
~ ~.-'
JdfPage, E S Director
'.i'
...
c
o
~7~.
I I i
';.
.
c
"
,.,
~
"
258e
,-".'
Question 26: Recreation and Open Space
SWFRPC:
The answer to Question 26-A is not complete. Please add the missing
text and include acreages. Also, please discuss the availability of these
open spaces (golf courses, parks. etc.) for use by the general public.
Response: The Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.27.1 0.A.1.e
requires that 35% of the gross acreage (that area of development within an SRA that
requires the consumption of stewardship credits) of an SRA town consist of open
space. Ave Maria will meet or exceed this requirement. Open space will include
active and passive parks, golf courses and trails, lakes, and wetland preserves. Map
H indicates a total of 298 acres of wetland preserves, community parks, and lakes.
Other open space uses such as golf courses, neighborhood parks and additional
lakes will be provided within Ave Maria. These uses will be quantified as the Master
Plan is further developed during the Stewardship Receiving Area designation
application, however, the commitment is assured by the LDC regulations.
Community open space such as the preserve areas and parks will be for the private
use of the residents of Ave Maria. Some open spaces, such as golf courses, will be
used on a membership basis.
SWFRPC:
The applicant mentions the use of trails as a recreational amenity in the
project. Has the applicant considered the incorporation of the proposed
FPL Trail as a trail opportunity for the project? Please include a
discussion of the application's positions as on the inclusion of the
proposed FPL Trail through the project site.
Response: The applicant is reviewing the FPL Trail opportunity and will request
additional information for consideration.
SWFRPC: Will sports and recreational facilities located on the University campus be
accessible to all students, faulty, and staff?
Response: Yes
Will there be any provisions for residents of the Town who do not have a
direct affiliation with the University to obtain use of these facilities?
Response: The University will coordinate use of the sports and recreational
facilities for Town residents.
913012004-141773 Ver: 031-JCANTREl
~,
007B6-{)13-000. PDSS. 28753
26 Be
, .,,',~
Question 27: Education
SWFRPC:
The applicant mentions the creation of a K-8 public school. Where will
these students to go school for 9-12 grades?
Response: There are three High Schools in the area. The Palmetto Ridge High
School is located on Oil Well Road, east of Immokalee, the Gulf Coast High School
is located at 7878 Immokalee Road and the Immokalee High School is located at
701 Immokalee Road.
SWFRPC:
The letter provided by the District School Board of Collier County (August
16.2004) questions the sources of information and how that infomnation
was used to determine the students per household data. Please address
the questions/concerns brought forth by the District School Board of
Collier County.
. The applicant uses 10.24% of Ave Maria residents as K-12
students when Collier County uses 14.30% and Alachua County
(county with a University) uses 14.76%.
. Higher percentage of population estimated to be over 65 for Ave
Maria than for the County as a whole (34.9% versus 24.8%).
. Students per total population in Collier County are estimated at
14.3% and the applicant estimates 2.39 persons per household for
the County.
. Table 10.3.A-2 includes average annual wage data that indicates a
significant number of low to middle income wage earners living
and working in the Town of Ave Maria. This would not indicate as
high a percentage of retirees nor as Iowa percentage of K-12
students as the applicant shows in Table 10.2.A-1.
Response: The student generation rates were based on two different data
sources based on the target markets and resulting demographic profiles expected
within various neighborhoods of the Town. These sources are 2000 census data
for Collier County and Fraser & Mohlke Associates demographic survey, "Census
of Village Walk" dated February 29, 1996. These population and student
generation rates were accepted in previous Developments of Regional Impacts. A
copy of the Study is attached for convenience.
For 2,200 dwelling units, the estimated population is 4,224 (2,200 units @ 1.92
persons per household), and an estimated 3.3% of that population will be school
aged children, or 139 children. For 2,500 units, the estimated population is 5,000
(2,500 units @ 2 persons per household), and an estimated 3.3% of that population
will be school aged children, or 165 children. These projections are similar to
those found in the Fraser & Mohlke Study and are representative of similar
communities that target empty nesters, retirees and singles.
We used US Census data to determine persons per household and number of
school aged children for the remaining 6,300 units as follows:
6,300 units @ 2.39 persons per household = 15,057 residents
14.5% of the population is estimated to be school aged children = 2,183 students
91301'2004- 1<11773 Ver: 031-JCANTREL
c_,
03786-013-000-PDSS-28753
'~;~c
Therefore, the total number of school-aged children within the Town of Ave Maria
is 2,487.
School Board: Typical. primarily, single use, residential communities (DRI or PUD) in
Southwest Florida would not be representative of the population mix
expected in a new town. It is not clear in the data provided what
community types are used to generate students per household.
Response: The student generation rates are discussed above.
School Board: The applicant estimates that 34.9% of the Ave Maria population will be 65
years of age or older. Collier County's percentage of those 65 or older is
24.8%. Alachua County's percentage of those 65 or older is 9.6%. The
applicant would need to provide the basis for this assumption or adjust
percentages consistent with comparable communities.
Response: The estimate of persons over 65 years of age was calculated based
on the target market described previously, which is more heavily weighted toward
seniors than the countywide average. The applicant believes this is the most
accurate estimate possible at this time.
School Board: Students per total population in Collier County is 14.3%. The applicant
would need to provide a basis for the estimation of 0.2% in Table
10.3.A.1.
School Board: The application bases its estimated population of 24.281 on 2.2 persons
per household. The estimated persons per household in Collier County is
2.39 (Source: University of Florida, BEBR). The lower number used by
the applicant should be revised or explained.
Response: The population and student generation rates are discussed above.
School Board: Table 10.3.A-2, Employment Wage Distribution, includes average annual
wage data that indicates a significant number of low to middle income
wage earners living and working in the Town of Ave Maria. This would not
indicate as high a percentage of retirees nor as Iowa percentage of K-12
students as the applicant shows in Table 10.2.A-1.
Response: The employment wage distribution is not based on the demographic
profile of the Town residents; it is based on the projected employment generated
by the businesses located in the Town. While it is true that Town residents and
University students may fill a substantial number of these jobs, one cannot
assume a direct correlation between these independent variables.
9J~ 141773 Ver:031-JCANTREL
0-
03786-013-000.PDSS_2B753
09/24/04 FRI 10:49 FAX 2399393412
WILSON MILLER I'M
+-'>~ WM MAIN
I4J 002
I
)/ (\
-"" - -.". -""" -" -- -". - -., -" ---""'-- --- - - "- '" --. - ", -- -'" "-- - ". - -"" - -- -"'''' -, -,.:--,,,, -- '--"" 8 - u
.'_"'W
Application For Development Approval
IslandWalk Development of Regional Impad
'~""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".""""""
Census of Village Walk: A DiVosta Community
Report Qj Findings
Prepared by:
Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc.
Post Office Box 2312
Naples, Florida 33939-2312
February 29, 1996
_ 0~/24~04
FRI 10:49 FAX 2399393412
WILSON MILLER FM
--)-)--) WM MAIN
I4J 00:\
"'8 C
Census of Village Walk: A DiVosta Community
Report of Findings
~"""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""'"
Problem Setting: The IslandWalk [aka Harvey Brothers Farm Property] site is
located in Township 48 South, Range 26 East including all of Section 33 and a
Portion of Section 34. The site consists of 704.66 acres of active and fallow fields
used for row crops and employed during the past year for crop production.
IslandWalk is proposed to be a planned residential community located in
Collier County's Urban Estates Planning Community District [PCD]. It will be
situated east of Interstate 75 [1-75], north of the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension,
and west of County Road 951 (CR-951].
IslandWaIk will be developed by DiVosta Homes, Inc., the developer of
VillageWalk, a 2,lOO-unit residential community located in the North Naples
PCD west of 1-75, south of the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension, east of
Airport-Pulling Road (CRC311, and approximately 1.5 miles directly west of
IslandWalk.
The IslandWalk site will accommodate 2,100 residential units; its residential-
absorption schedule for the 6-year bUildout period of the project is demonstrated
below:
Year Single-Family Sirurle-Family Multi-Family Total Residential
[Detached] [Attached]
1997 175 175 0 350
1998 175 175 0 350
1999 175 175 0 350
2000 125 125 100 350
2001 125 125 100 350
2002 125 125 100 350
Total 900 900 300 2100
Note; In respect to the ADA analysis, attached sing/e-{Qmily Tesidences Will be considered as
multi-filrnily units for the purposes of calculating transportation impacts (ADA Question 21].
Utilizing person-per-dwelling_unit population data proVided in the
Demographic and Economic Profile for the Urban Estates PCD, a ratio of 2.38 persons
per household [pPH] yields an estimated 4,99B-person population for the subject
IslandWalk community [2,100 units x 2.38 PPH].
Page 1
09/24/04 FRI ]0:50 FAX 23993934[2
WILSON MILLER FM
+-}-c> WM MAIN l4J 004
"Be
In the Analysis of Harvey Brothers Farm Property Uune 5, 1995], Section 3.1:
PreliminaIy Land Use Scenario {page 4) prepared by Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek,
Inc. (WMB&P), it was "noted that specific demographic survey data that could be
developed relative to DiVosta's existing buyer profile could be used during the DRI
analYsis to justify a smaller ratio and total population." This Report of Findings
reviews the outcome of survey-research documenting the demographic
characteristics of residents Within the VillageWalk community and the number and
age of school children living at home and attending grades from Kindergarten
through Grade 12 and local post-secondary educational institutions.
Study Area: For demographic survey-and-analysis purposes, the study area
for the IslandWaIk ADA was the existing VilIageWaIk community. VillageWalk has
Virtually identical development parameters to the IslandWalk community.
Utilization of Survey-Research Findings: The reported research findings of the
survey of 272 VillageWalk residents will be employed to Calculate a buildout
population, including resident students, for IslandWalk.
Survey-Research Methodology: A four-question survey instrument was
employed to inquire of 272ViIIageWalk residents regarding:
· Tenure of residence in CoIIier County;
. Number of household residents and the age of each member of the
household;
. Number of resident household members attending school and the grade
attended for each member living at home; and
. Type of residence: Attached dweUing units and detached dweIIing units.
For the pUrposes of calculating transportation impacts [ADA Question 2n attached units
will be treated as multi-filmily dwelling units.
OuestioDl1aire EXPOsition: The actual survey questionnaire inquiring about
the composition of households now in residence in ViIIageWalk follows as Exhibit
"A". Questionnaires were administered by DiVosta sales personnel. Survey
procedures were well supervised and completed questionnaires Were collected and
evaluated on a regular basis. Interviews were conducted the week of February 12-
19, 1996.
This concludes a review of the methOdology employed for collecting and
analYZing household size and composition for the Village Walk community and
thereby providing a database for estimating household .size and composition for the
proposed IslandWalk development.
Samoling Considerations: (Narrative to follow)
Summary of Findings: Utilizing person-per-dweIIing_unit population data a~
- demonstrated in Table 1.1 of thisRepijrt of Findings yields an overall ratio of 1.92
persons per household [PPH] and an estimated 4,032-person population for the
subject IslandWalk community [2,100 units x 1.92 PPHJ at the time of build out.
Page 2
WILSON MILLER FM -}'-4~ WM MAIN I4J 00;;
_ 09/24/04 FRI 10:52 FAX 2399393412 "'8 C
TABLE 1.1
Attached Detached
Total Households 2-8edroom 3/4 Bedroom
Question fAil Unit Types] Patio Units Single Family
I\lrrber % I\Lrrtler % N..Jni:ler %
1. "How long have you lived
in Collier County? When
did you move here?" Total 272 100.00 146 100.00 126 100.00
1993-1995 109 40.07 50 34.25 59 46.83
1990-1992 28 10.29 16 10.96 12 9.52
1987-1989 22 8.09 11 7.54 11 8.73
1 984-1 986 5 1.84 2 1.37 3 2.38
1981-1983 3 1.10 1 0.68 2 1.59
Before 1981 5 1.84 4 2.74 1 0.79
Do not live in Collier County 99 36040 61 41.78 38 30.16
Don't remerrt>er - Don't Know 1 0.37 1 0.68 0 0.00
2. "How many merrbers of you-
household, including your-
self, are in each of these
age groLps? Total 523 100.00 265 100.00 258 100.00
45 or older 476 91.01 252 95.09 224 86.82
35-44 19 3.63 7 2.64 12 4.65
25-34 14 2.69 4 1.51 10 3.87
19-24 2 0.38 0 0.00 2 0.78
15-18 2 0.38 0 0.00 2 0.78
12-]4 2 0.38 1 0.38 1 0.39
5-11 6 1.15 1 0.38 5 1.93
Under 5 2 0.38 0 0.00 2 0.78
Persons Per Household [PPH] 1.92 1.82 2.05
3. "Are any family members now
living at h<lme attending any
public or private school?"
Total 272 100.00 146 100.00 126 100.00
Private-school households 2 0.74 0 0.00 2 1.59
Public-school households 6 2.21 1 0.68 5 3.97
No one attending school 263 96.69 144 98.64 119 94044
No Answer 1 0.36 1 . 0.68 0 0.00
Grade level of Students: Total 11 100.00 2. 100.00 2 100.00
K-5 6 54.55 1 50.00 5 55.56
6-8 2 18.18 1 50.00 1 11.11
9-12 2 18.18 0 0.00 2 22.22
College 1 9.09 0 0.00 1 11.11
Page 3
- 09/24/04 FRl 10:53 FAX 2399393412
. .
WILSON MILLER FM
~-l~ WM MAIN
Ii1I 000
8C
TABLE 1.2
IslandWalk Residential Absorption Schedule
~ Sinale-Family Sin<:lle-Family Multi.family Total Residential
[Detached] [Attached]
1997 175 175 0 350
1998 175 175 0 350
1999 175 175 0 350
2000 125 125 100 350
2001 125 125 100 350
2002 125 125 100 350
Total 900 900 300 2100
TABLE 1.3
Projected IslandWalk Po~ulation Absorption
[Number of ersons]
2.05 PPH 1.82 PPH 1.82 PPH 1.92 PPH
1997 359 319 0 672
1998 359 318 0 672
1999 359 319 0 672
2000 257 227 182 672
2001 257 228 182 672
2002 257 227 182 672
Total 1848 1638 546 4032
PPH: Persons Per Household [PPH] determinations were derived from the census of VillageWalk resi-
dents conducted February 12-19, 1996 and reported in Table 1.1 of this Report of Findings.
Page 4
09/24/04
FRI 10:53 FAX 2399393412
WILSON MILLER FM
+H WM MAIN
I4J 007
. .
'ac
Application For Development Approval: IslandWalk
EX HI BIT "A"
Vllla2:e Walk HOusing Surve)!
Please take a few moments to ask current owners the following questions, enclosing all completed
surveys in the attached envelope, and retum them to management at the end of each day. Thank
you for your cooperation
VillageWalk Owner Survey: #
1. How long have you lived in Collier [J 1993-1995 [J 1990-1992
County? What year did you move here? [ J 1984-1986 [J 1981-1983
[Please "V" in one box onlY.J [ J Do not live in Collier County
[ J 1987-1989
[ J Before 1981
2. How many members of your household, [
indudinK1'Ourse1f, are in each of these age [
groups? [Write in the number in each age [
group. If there is no one, please record "O".J [
J 45 or older, Number [
J 35-44, Number [
J 25-34, Number [
J 19-24, Number [
J 15-18, Number
J 12-14, Number
J 5-11, Number
J Under 5, Number
3. Are any family members now living at home [ J Elementary School: Kindergarten to Grade 5
attending any public or private school? [J Middle School: Grade 6 to Grade 8
[Write in the number in each Grade group. [ J High School: Grade 9 to Grade 12
If there is no one, please record "O".J [J Post-secondary school or College
[ J NQ one living at home is attending S<:hool. [ ] Other [write in!:
[ J Students attend vrivate school [ J Students attend ImbUe school
4. How would you describe the residence you [ J Attached 2-bedroom patio home
own. Is it the. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " [ J Detached 3-bedroom single-family home
[Please "V" in the correct box.J [ J Detached 4-bedroom single-family home
Gender of the person intervieWed: [ J Male [ J Female
'sc
Question 28: Healthcare
SWFRPC:
Will the University provide healthcare services for its students, faculty, and
staff?
Response: Health care services for students of the University will be provided
by medical facilities located within the town. There are no on-campus health care
facilities planned for the project. The town medical facilities will also be available
to the faculty and staff of the university.
91301'2004_ 141173 Vet': 03'- JCANTREl
c_
03786-013-000-POSS.Z8753
29 Pac
Question 30: Historical and ArchaeoloQical Sites
SWFRPC: State Division of Historical Resources needs to provide a letter indicating
their acceptance of the historical marker solution. An attempt will be
made by SWFRPC to seek such input.
Response: No action/response required by the applicant.
9130/2004. 141773 Ver. 03!. JCANTREL
,-,
03786-013.()O(}.POSS-28753
'ac
The Town of Ave Maria DRI
Sufficiency Response #2
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council = SWFRPC
South Florida Water Management District = SFWMD
Florida Department of Transportation = FDOT
Collier County Staff = County
Question 10: General Proiect Description
County: On page 10-2 of the Application, the narrative indicates that Stewardship
Sending Areas are subject to a Stewardship Easement. Collier County
staff requests that the applicant provide evidence of such recorded
easements. Have properties been protected through such easements?
How many acres (relative to the DRI Application) have been protected in
this fashion? The applicant should provide a map showing lands
protected through Stewardship Easements.
Response: Stewardship Sending Areas (SSAs) 1-5 have been protected through
Stewardship Easements. and officially recorded with Collier County
as follows:
. SSA 1 (O.R. Book 3551, pages 2250-2263)
. SSA 2 (O.R. Book 3551. pages 2270-2283)
. SSA 3 (O.R. Book 3551, pages 2291-2343)
. SSA 4 (O.R. Book 3551. pages 2353-2401)
. SSA 5 (O.R. Book 3664, pages 1468-1478)
SSAs 1-5 have protected 7138 acres through such easements. An
application for Stewardship Sending Area 6 (SSA 6) is currently
being prepared and will be filed shortly. SSA 6 is approximately
9.861 acres in area. bringing the total acreage of protected lands to
16,999 acres. A map of SSAs 1-6 is included with this submittal.
The applicant should modify Tables 10.1 B-1 and 12.A-2 to show all
County preservation areas by both FLUCCS Code and total acreage.
Also, the tables should provide the total acreage for each FLUCCS Code.
Response: For development occurring within the Rural Lands Stewardship
program, Policy 6.13 of Collier County's Growth Management Plan,
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME), states that
"native vegetation shall be preserved pursuant to the RLSA policies
found in the Future Land Use Element." Policy 4.9 of the FLUE
indicates that native vegetation preservation requirements for the
DRI are met through the dedication of SSAs, and areas with a Natural
Resource Index (NRI) value of greater than 1.2 must be preserved.
Section 4.08.07.J.6.a of the Collier County LDC relates to this policy.
No areas within the DRI have an NRI value greater than 1.2.
Protection of native vegetation areas occurs within the SSAs used to
entitle the project, as described above.
11130/2004- 1434B6 Ver; 03!. MPERRY
~",
03766-0'3-00Q-PDR1.2842J
"'ac
With regard to Table 1 0.1 B-1, many of the areas described in the Table
as "disturbed", would actually fit the County's requirements for native
vegetation preservation. This is because previously disturbed areas that
have been revegetated largely by native plants count toward native
preservation requirements. The applicant should provide a table that
shows those FLUCCS Codes that fit the County's requirements, including
the percentage of native vegetation required and the percentage actually
preserved. Native vegetation preservation is calculated based upon 75%
canopy cover and not overall species percentage. A minimum of 25% of
canopy being native requires its inclusion in the preservation area(s).
Response: As indicated in the previous response. the County's vegetation
preservation requirements for this project are met according to the
FLUE (Policy 4.9) for the Rural Lands Stewardship Area overlay
district and Section 4.08.07.J.6.a of the Collier County LDC. The
standards listed above are not applicable to the DRI since it is part of
the RLSA program.
Staff notes that the DRI project area, as referenced in the application, is
much larger than the currently approved Stewardship Receiving Area
(SRA). Therefore the currently approved SRA will need to be amended or
a new SRA Application will need to be filed.
Response: A revised/updated SRA application is being finalized and will be filed
with Collier County during the month of December, 2004. This SRA
will encompass the same area as the DRI.
SFWMD: Regarding Table 10.1.8-2, what is the design capacity of the public and
private schools (i.e., number of students)?
Response: The Town of Ave Maria will accommodate a total of 3.100 students in
public and private schools located onsite. Please refer to the Table
below for the design capacity for the schools.
Town of Ave Maria
Public and Private Schools
Design Capacity
STUDENT CAPACITY
1,000
1,200
900
'Information obtained from Collier County School Board staff.
1111012004. 143486 Ver: OJ!- MPERRY
C^"'"
OJ786-013-00o-PDRI_2842J
2
.Be
Question 12: VeQetation and Wildlife
County: With regard to the discussion of "Existing Vegetation Associations" (page
12-1), please see question 10-3, above.
Response: Please refer to the previous response for question 10-3.
With regard to Table 12-A-1, please see question 10-2, above.
Response: Please refer to the previous response for question 10-2.
With regard to the discussion of "Preserved Vegetation Associations"
(page 12-9), the applicant should demonstrate how the recreation of
freshwater marshes would fulfill County mitigation requirements. Staff
notes that exotic removal does not count as mitigation.
Response: It appears that this question is addressing County wetland mitigation
requirements. The proposed enhancement and preservation of
wetlands onsite is subject to Collier County RLSA Group 4 Policies
(e.g., Policy 4.9) of the FLUE. The corresponding LDC sections are
3.05.07.D (vegetation preservation) and 3.05.07.F (wetland
mitigation), both of which indicate that specific standards for
development within the RLSA are pursuant to LDC Section 4.08.00.
Section 4.08.00 states that the primary means for satisfying
vegetation preservation and wetland mitigation standards involves
the dedication of Stewardship Sending Areas (SSAs). The applicant
has committed to protecting 16,999:1: acres of SSA lands (SSAs 1-6),
approximately half of which are native wetlands. Any further wetland
mitigation requirements will be determined by SFWMD and the
Corps of Engineers permitting process.
If the project is utilizing Stewardship Sending Area (SSA) acreage to
account for the County's required preserved acreage, then the applicant
must provide proof of the recordation of Stewardship Easements for such
property and/or proof that the acreage has been donated to an acceptable
public entity.
Response: Proof is provided in the response to Question 10-1, in the form of
Collier County Official Records (O.R.) book numbers and page
numbers that verify recordation of the easements. The proposed
SSA #6 will have a recorded stewardship easement as well.
With regard to the listed species shown in Tables 12.C-1 and 12.C-2, the
applicant should provide habitat management plans for all listed species
shown. Also, the applicant should provide copies of any correspondence,
permits or requirements received from State and Federal permitting
agencies relative to listed species.
Response: Policy 7.1.3 of the CCME states that listed species protection within
the RLSA is accomplished pursuant to policies outlined in the FLUE.
~~~12004- 143486 Vero 03!_ MPERRY 3
OJI86-013-00Q..PORI-28423
"Be
Within the RLSA overlay district. Policy 3.2 of the FLUE indicates
that listed species and their habitats shall be protected by the
establishment of Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) and their
inclusion within SSAs. SSAs 1-5 have already dedicated 5738 acres
of HSAs for protection, and the pending SSA 6 is estimated to
include 4993 acres of HSAs, for a total of 10.731 HSA acres.
The applicant is currently working with Federal and State wildlife
agencies regarding listed species issues. as part of the ERP
permitting process. An ERP application for the majority of the DRI
will be submitted in December 2004. The issuance of permits and
special conditions relative to listed species will be addressed in
greater detail therein.
With regard to the listed species displayed on Map G and shown in Tables
12.C-1 and 12.C-2, the applicant should provide a discussion of the
impact of the proposed development on each of these species and the
manner in which adverse impacts will be mitigated.
Response: Within the RLSA overlay district, Policy 3.2 of the FLUE
accomplishes protection of listed species and their habitats through
the legally binding dedication of SSAs. as discussed previously. The
listed species displayed on Map G generally utilize agricultural land
uses, which are the predominant land uses within the RLSA. The
impacts to these species are therefore negligible, while the benefits
of protecting over 10.000 acres of HSAs are considerable.
The applicant should provide a Collier County Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) which meets the requirements contained in Section 3.8.5,
of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).
Response:
Section 10.02.02.A.6 ofthe Collier County LDC states, "Relation
between EIS and Development of Regional Impact (DRI): In any
instance where the proposed project requires both an EIS and a DRI,
their data may be embodied in one report provided such report
includes all the required information on both the EIS and DRI." The
DRI application meets the requirements for an EIS as outlined in
Section 10.02.02.A.4 of the LDC.
1113012004-143486 Ver03'-MPERRY
CAII<3
037B6.Q13-000-PORI-28423
4
"'sc
Question 13: Wetlands
County: With regard to the discussion of buffers for preserved or enhanced
wetlands (page 13-4), the LDC, Section 3.9.5.5.6 (4), requires a 300'
setback from onsite f10wways and a 25' setback for primary structures,
and a 10' setback for site alteration and accessory structures, from all
County-acquired preserves. The applicant should provide a site plan map
that demonstrates compliance with these setback requirements.
Response: Site Development Plan #1 for the first phase of the DRI (i.e., the PDA)
was previously submitted to Collier County and is nearing approval.
The detailed site plans for SDP #1 demonstrate compliance with
referenced setback requirements, and are consistent with site plans
for the balance of the DRI. Detailed site plans are currently being
drafted as part of the ERP application for the balance of the DRI.
County staff requests that the applicant provide a copy of the approved
South Florida Water Management District jurisdictional wetland lines for
the Ave Maria DR!.
Response:
A jurisdictional wetland field review request has been filed with
SFWMD for wetlands shown as "Pending" on Map F-2, and a field
review is expected in the near future. Please note that all wetlands
shown as "Pending" on Map F-2 are separated from non-hydric
agricultural land by berms and ditches, and their extents are clearly
identifiable in the field. Changes to the mapped wetland areas are
therefore unlikely.
1113012004-143466 Ve,,03'-MPERRY
~.,
03786-013-000-PDRI-2B423
5
-se
Question 14: Water
SFWMD: The response to SFWMD Question 10 does not address the existing vs.
proposed water use. Please submit a table that shows the current
agricultural water use for the project site (row crops) vs. the proposed
water use (landscape irrigation, public water supply, industrial chillers,
etc.).
Response: There is no reliable data available that shows current agricultural
water use. Existing permits allow the withdrawal of 4,043 million
gallons per year for this purpose.
Proposed water use is described in Table 17.A-1 in the application
for development approval.
1113012004-143486 Ver:03!-MPERRY
c~,
03786-013.00O-PDRI-28423
6
"'8 C
Question 17: Water Supplv
SFWMD: In response to a SWFRPC question, the applicant states that the existing
wells "will not be capped". This is not accurate. Many wells have already
been abandoned and they will be replaced by new wells. In addition, this
response also states "estimates of irrigation demand vs. reclaimed water
supply is not known". These estimates can be made based on the
proposed project land uses and the projected population and should be
provided.
Response: The response should have stated that new irrigation wells will not be
capped. Existing wells that cannot be used either due to their
location or structural integrity will be capped.
Our current estimate of irrigation demand and reclaimed water
availability is shown in the table below. If the quantity of reclaimed
water produced does not reach the projected amounts, additional
supplemental irrigation will be necessary. The amount of additional
supplemental irrigation water may be as much as two million gallons
per day.
Estimate of Irrigation Demand vs. Reclaimed Water Supply
Present*
Phase 1*
Phase 2
Irrigation Demand*
MGD
1,6
4.5
5.8
Reclaimed Water
Available
MGD
o
3.2
5.8
Supplemenlallrrigation
Water Required
MGD
1.6
1.3
o
* Assume phase initial irrigation demand = 50% phase final irrigation demand
11/30/2004.143486 Ver:03!.MPERRY
c_,
0378lJ.-013-000-PDRI_28423
7
"sr
Question 19: Stormwater ManaClement
County: The applicant should provide County staff with a copy of the project's
conceptual stormwater calculations. Said copy should be signed and
sealed by a registered Florida professional engineer.
Response: One signed/sealed copy of the preliminary stormwater model for the
Ave Maria DRI has been provided to Robert Wiley, Collier County
Development Services, under separate cover, per his request.
With regard to Question B., on page 19-1, is there any existing or
proposed Collier County stormwater facility easements on the project
site? If so. such existing or proposed easements must be maintained free
of any landscaping, berms or any other kind of obstacle that would
impede access by maintenance crews and equipment. The DRI narrative
should include a statement to this effect, if applicable.
Response: To the applicant's knowledge, there are no existing stormwater
facility easements on the project site, nor are any proposed. The
Ave Maria Special District, not Collier County, will maintain the
backbone and common area stormwater management facilities.
Question D., on pages 19-2 and 19-3, is supposed to provide a thorough
discussion of the volume and quality of stormwater runoff from the site,
under existing conditions, and as compared to proposed future conditions.
The answer provided on page 19-3 is not sufficient. The applicant must
provide a thorough discussion on the projected difference in total volume
of stormwater typically discharged (peak discharge rate) under current
conditions (with mostly pervious areas). and the volume of stormwater
discharged under proposed conditions, with changes in the
amount/percentages of pervious and impervious areas. The discussion
must include necessary calculations.
Response: The applicant met with Collier County staff to discuss this request.
The applicant is currently in the process of preparing a detailed
model and water quality calculations, based on the most current
land plan. That design will be presented to the South Florida Water
Management District for review and approval through the
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) process. The ERP application
will include the detailed water quality analysis for SFWMD to review
and approve for water quality certification, as per their agreement
with the Army Corps of Engineers and the USEPA.
Also with regard to Question D., the applicant must provide a thorough
analysis and discussion of the projected differences in water quality in the
current and proposed conditions. The discussion must address nutrients,
metals, clarity, pesticides/herbicides, dissolved oxygen, hydrocarbons,
litter, and other potential contaminants. In this analysis and discussion,
the applicant should consider pre-development. in-construction and post-
development conditions, as the total development is very large and will
take years to complete.
11/3012004"143488 V""OJ!.MPERRY
(''''..,
0376fi.-013_00o. PDRI. 28423
8
"8r
Response: The applicant is currently in the process of preparing a detailed
model and water quality calculations. based on the most current
land plan. That design will be presented to the South Florida Water
Management District for review and approval through the
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) process. The ERP application
will include the detailed water quality analysis for SFWMD to review
and approve for water quality certification, as per their agreement
with the Army Corps of Engineers and the USEPA.
On pages 19-2 and 19-3, the proposed stormwater control elevations are
stated as ranging between 19.0' NGVD and 22.0' NGVD. However, page
19-5 states a range between 19.5' NGVD and 22.6' NGVD. The applicant
should clarify the proposed range of control elevations.
Response:
The applicant clarifies that the proposed stormwater control
elevations range between 19.5 ft.-NGVD and 22.2 ft.-NGVD.
1113012004-143480 Ver:03'.MPERRY
CA#4)
03100-013-000. PDRI. 28423
9
-RC
Question 21: Transportation
County: General Statement: The information provided in response to Question 21
has raised several concerns among Collier County Transportation staff
regarding the validity of assumptions, figures within tables and supporting
documentation. The primary concern is whether this DRI will significantly
impact County Roadway segments and intersections projected to operate
at an unacceptable level of service at the proposed horizon year with only
those specified traffic mitigation measures stipulated in the project's
responses.
Response: The analysis provided in response to Question 21 of the ADA
identifies intersections and roadway segments significantly
impacted by the DRI. The applicant believes that the application is
sufficient for review. and believes that any mitigation measures
considered appropriate can be more effectively addressed during
the review stage.
Staff has a concern regarding the description given to support Question C.
(on page 21-13 and following), relating to the internal capture rate, and
specifically the argument supporting a remote master planned mixed-use
residential university town. The FOOT Site Impact Handbook considers a
capture rate of 20 to 25 percent to be very high for any mixed-use
development, including remote projects. The applicant should propose a
speCific monitoring program and mitigation selection process that can be
pursued if external traffic exceeds the levels assumed in the ADA. Due to
the projected number of trips that could be generated by the DRI. perhaps
these programs could be stricter than those already permitted through the
Substantial Deviation process.
Response: The applicant understands the concerns raised by the various
review agencies concerning the use of what may appear to be a
higher than normal "internal capture rate". A great deal of research
and analysis has been done, both during the PDA stage and now in
the DRI stage of approvals dealing with the issue of internal/external
traffic. While a 20-30% internal split may be customary for a project
in an urban setting, a mixed use "town" such as Ave Maria, set in a
rural area. can be expected to have a completely different
internal/external traffic relationship. Research into "isolated" self
contained, large-scale developments has demonstrated the higher
degree of internalization of traffic when a variety of essential and
supporting uses are properly mixed to provide the destinations for
the origins within the town. As an example, a detailed analysis of
Marco Island has revealed an internal capture of daily and peak hour
traffic in the 70-80% range.
Marco Island covers an area of approximately 6.000 acres and has a
current dwelling unit mix of 5,876 single family and 8.915 multi-
family dwellings. Marco Island has its own public elementary and
charter middle school. and while it does not have a 6,000 student
l1f3012004-143486 V",.03'-MPERRY
C~it43
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
10
, Be
university. it does have approximately 1,780 hotel/motel rooms and
related resort Irecreational amenities (including public and private
beaches and parks) that represent a significant trip attraction
potential. In addition to the residential and resort land uses on the
island. Marco's land use mix currently includes over 778,000 square
feet of commercial space. affording residents and visitors all manner
of goods, services and employment opportunities.
Not unlike Ave Maria. Marco Island enjoys a remote location, isolated
from the mainland by two access roads. Marco Island's
internal/external capture profile was developed by evaluating the
current land use mix on the Island using ITE standard trip rates. and
comparing the gross totals against the volumes of traffic entering
and exiting the Island. The resulting 70-80% internal capture
confirms the contention that well planned mixed-use developments,
with a critical mass sufficient to support a broad mix of support
goods and services, when isolated by distance from competing
goods and services available elsewhere, will internally retain, or
capture, a significant portion of the gross number of trips generated.
While there may be disagreement as to the appropriateness of the
capture rates use and documented in the ADA, the applicant
believes that the application is sufficiently complete for review, and
believes that differences of opinion on assumptions and
conclusions can be discussed and evaluated in greater detail in the
review stage.
Table 21-7 (Development Parameters) is inconsistent with the land Use
Summary, as presented within the Transportation Appendices. The
applicant should revise these two items to be consistent with each other.
Response: The table in the Appendix 21-1 is part of a document prepared to
summarize items discussed in the Pre-Application meeting. It
reflects an understanding of development parameters agreed to by
all parties at that time.
The total peak hour external trips, as presented in Table 21-9 (4.100), is
inconsistent with that presented in Table 21-11 (4,107). The applicant
should clarify the correct figure and revise the two tables for consistency.
Response: The values for PM Peak Hour Total External Trips presented in both
Tables 21-9 and 21-11 are identical (4,107).
Table 21-19 suggests that 1-75 will operate at an acceptable lOS with 4 to
6-lane improvements. Staff disagrees with this assumption without further
analysis of the 1-75 corridor.
Response: The published Peak Hour Directional Service Volume for a six-lane
freeway is 4,550. The highest projected peak hour directional traffic
volume on 1-75 in 2016 is reported in the analysis as 3,651 (Table 21-
~~12004-14J486 Vero03!-MPERRY 11
03786-Q13-000-PDRI-28423
'BG
..
15). indicating that the recommended 6-lane improvement will
provide an acceptable level of service.
Transportation staff disagrees with the following proposed improvements,
as referenced in Table 21-21:
a) At Immokalee Road and 1-75, the Table proposes changing an
EBL into an EBT. This is not acceptable.
b) At Immokalee Road and Oaks Boulevard. the Table proposes
adding a WBL. There is currently, and will be, only one receiving
lane on Oaks Boulevard.
c) At Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road, the Table's proposed
additional improvements should actually be in the Programmed
Improvement Column.
In addition, the identified deficient segments and corresponding fair share
calculation of impact and mitigation may not be covered by the payment of
impact fees. Furthermore, the intersection improvements identified cannot
be funded using impact fees unless they are part of a Capital
Improvement Project. Therefore, a mitigation strategy for these
improvements needs to be addressed.
Response: The recommended improvements included in the analysis are but
one of perhaps many possible solutions and are not meant to be the
only solution. The applicant acknowledges that certain design
limitations may influence the resultant choice of solutions as well.
With respect to a mitigation strategy. there are a number of possible
mitigation strategies that will be explored. The applicant will work
with the County during the review process to determine the
appropriate one. or mix. of measures that serve to adequately
mitigate any significant and adverse impacts of the Ave Maria DRI.
FOOT: On page 1 of Appendix 21-1 in the Transportation Appendices, July, 2004.
in the second sentence of the last paragraph, the Applicant states: "The
latest available version of SYNCHRO software will be used to perform the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) compliant analysis." The submitted
analysis, based on the SYNCHRO equation, is not HCM compliant. A
version of the SYNCHRO output that is HCM compliant should be
submitted.
Response: Differences in average delay between the two methods are minor,
and Synchro's calculated delay is sometimes more conservative.
and thus more appropriate for a planning level analysis. The analysis
provided is consistent with the agreed upon methodology, and that
used in Collier County traffic impact analyses. Any variations in the
calculated delay are not likely to be significant enough to warrant a
reanalysis. The Synchro files have been provided as part of the
original submittal package in the event the reviewer wishes to
perform any subsequent analysis.
~~~~12004.- 143486 Ver 03 ,- MPERRY 12
037ll6-013.00o-PDRI-21J.423
"-se
Please provide an arterial level of service analysis for any significantly
impacted state highway facility, (V/C > 1.0).
Response: A detailed "arterial level of service analysis" is not appropriate for
this type of planning level of analysis. The applicant acknowledges
that any facility with a V/C ration greater than 1.0 is aversely
impacted, and the appropriate counter measures have been
identified. While a more detailed analysis may increase the ratio
(higher), such an increase will not change the need for the
improvement. only the proportionate share calculation. Conversely.
a more detailed analysis may result in a reduction of the ratio, below
1.0 resulting in a facility no longer being identified as adversely
impacted. Level of service analyses were performed. by comparing
traffic volumes with published service volumes. The service volumes
used. in most cases, are the basis for Collier County's concurrency
system, and are updated regularly to reflect changes in conditions
along the road segments. This analysis method was agreed on in
the methodology meeting and the applicant believes it is appropriate
for a planning level effort of this kind.
The analysis submitted by the Applicant does not meet FOOT guidelines
for impact analysis on the State Highway System as it relates to cycle
lengths. The Department reserves the right to perform alternative
analyses using cycle length, which we feel to be more appropriate.
Response: The impact analysis guidelines should be used with the appropriate
level of effort needed for the type of approvals being sought. An
analysis for a development seeking a building permit is different
than an analysis needed to assess a project's potential impacts 10
years in the future. In the former case, the use of very specific
(current) parameters is called for. In the latter case, more
generalized (e.g.. average) values better serve the analysis. The
applicant believes that quantifying the effect of changes to these
input variables related to cycle length (or green time, percent heavy
vehicles, peak hour factors or queue length) is not needed for this
type of planning level effort, and are in fact, more suitable at the
design stage. The applicant acknowledges the right of the review
agency to conduct an independent analysis. and to the extent that
the reviewer wishes to modify any of the input parameters or factors.
all of the necessary input files have been provided.
The analysis submitted by the Applicant does not meet FOOT guidelines
for impact analysis on the State Highway System as it relates to minimum
green times. The Department reserves the right to perform alternative
analyses using minimum green time data which we feel to be more
appropriate.
Response:
See previous response.
1113012004- 14J4116 Vet: 03!- MPERRY
c_,
OJ786-01J-oOO-PDRI-28423
13
..
Be
The analysis submitted by the Applicant does not meet FOOT guidelines
for impact analysis on the State Highway System as it relates to percent
heavy vehicles. The Department reserves the right to perform alternative
analyses usin9 percent heavy vehicle data, which we feel to be
appropriate.
Response: See previous response.
The analysis submitted by the Applicant does not meet FOOT guidelines
for impact analysis on the State Highway System as it relates to Peak
Hour factors. The Department reserves the right to perform alternative
analyses using Peak Hour Factor data, which we feel to be more
appropriate.
Response: See previous response.
The analysis submitted by the Applicant does not meet FOOT guidelines
for impact analysis on the State Highway System as it relates to Que
Length estimation. The Department reserves the right to perform
alternative analyses using Que Length estimation procedures, which we
feel to be more appropriate.
Response: See previous response.
The Department continues to have concerns regarding AM Peak impacts
at several intersections and reserves the right to perform AM peak
analyses at those intersections where we feel it to be appropriate.
Response: An AM peak hour analysis is normally not required (and was not
requested at the Pre-Application/Methodology) for DRI planning
analysis. In this case no AM data was collected and thus no AM
analysis was performed for the Ave Maria DRI. Conventional
thinking indicates that the PM peak hour will. in almost all cases, be
the worst hour of the day. Notwithstanding, at the point in time of
making any improvements, both an AM and PM peak hour analysis
would be appropriate.
~~':.O;2004. 143486 Vcr 03!- MPERRY 14
03786-013-000-PDRI-211473
Question 24: Affordable Housinq
SWFRPC: Based on the response, can we assume that this new town will not have
housing for the very low income wage earners, and that all very low
income workers will have to live outside the town?
Response: The applicant will provide 200 very low-income units within the town.
These units will be phased so that a pro-rata share will be available
by the end of the first phase and buildout of the project, based on
the percentage of construction of non-residential square footage.
Based on the response, can we assume that this new town will not have
owner-occupied units available to the low-income wage earners because
it seems that only rental apartments will be available for this income
group?
Response:
The applicant will provide 700 low-income units within the town; at
least 50% (350 units) of these units will be owner-occupied units.
Construction of these units will be phased so that a pro-rata share
will be available by the end of the first phase and buildout of the
project, based on the percentage of construction of non-residential
square footage.
1113OJ20Q4-14348S Verc03!-MPERRY
~"'
0378&Ol3-000-PDRI-2S423
15
THE TOWN OF AVE MARIA
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
7/2312004- 135518 Ver: OH- MPERRV
-
03786-013-OQO. PDRI. 28423
Be
11
.,
RPM-BSP-ADA-1
Section(s)
Be
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subiect
Paqe Number
Question Number
PART I.
1
2,3
4,5,6.7
8
PART II.
9
10
11
PART III.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PART IV.
21
22
23
7/2312004- 13~16 Ver: 01l- MPERRY
=*'
03786-013-0Q0.PDRI-26423
Application Information
Statement of Intent
Application Information
Development Information
Permit Information
1
2
5
8-1
General Section
Maps
General Project Description
Revenue Generation Summary
9-1
10-1
11-1
Environmental Resources Impacts
Vegetation and Wildlife
Wetlands
Water
Soils
Floodplains
Water Supply
Wastewater Management
Stormwater Management
Solid Waste/Hazardous Waste/Medical Waste
12-1
13-1
14-1
15-1
16-1
17-1
18-1
19-1
20-1
Transportation Resource Impacts
Transportation Considerations 21-1
Air- Exempt per pre-application meeting on May 19. 2004
Hurricane Preparedness - Exempt per pre-application meeting on May 19, 2004
ii
Be .,
..."
,A
Section( s) Subiect PaQe Number
PART V. Human Resource Impacts
24 Housing 24-1
25 Police and Fire Protection 25-1
26 Recreation and Open Space 26-1
27 Education 27-1
28 Health Care 28-1
29 Energy 29-1
30 Historical and Archaeological Sites 30-1
PART VI. Specific DRllnformation
38 Schools 38-1
7/23t2004- 135516 Ver: 01'_ MPERRY
-,
037IlB.-Ol3-000.PORI_2B4Z3
jji
8r
LIST OF TABLES
Table/Description
Paqe Number
10.1.B-1/Existing Land Use Descriptions ................................................................................ 10-4
10.1.B-2/Proposed Land Uses ................................................................................................ 10-5
10.3.A-1/Demographic Information ....................................................................................... 10-10
10.3.A-2/Employment Wage Distribution .............................................................................. 10-11
10.4. B-1 /Public Facility Impacts............................................. ................................................ 10-14
11.1.1/Fiscallmpact Detail......................................................................................................11-3
11.2.1/Development Scenario Assumptions............................................................................ 11-4
11.2.2fTaxable Property Values .............................................................................................. 11-4
11.2.3/Sales Tax Calculation ................................................................................................... 11-5
11.2.4/Fiscallmpact Assumptions............................................... ............................................ 11-6
11.2.5/Collier County Budget FY 2002 .................................................................................... 11-7
11.2.6/1mpact Fee Rates ....................................................................................................... 11-10
11.2.7/lmpact Fee Revenue .................................................................................................. 11-11
12.A-1/Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Use Descriptions .....................................12-3
12.B-1/Listed Species Survey Details.................. .................................................................. 12-11
12.C-1/Listed Plant Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary ..................12-14
12.C-2/Listed Wildlife Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary............... 12-14
12.C-3/Listed Wildlife Species that Could Potentially Occur On Site
But Were Not Observed ................................................................................12-15
13.A-1/SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland Acreages...................................................................13-2
14A-1/Geologist's Log of MC-5001 ....................................................................................... 14-19
14A-2/Geologist's Log of MC-5075 ....................................................................................... 14-32
14A-3/Soil Boring of Well B-327 ............................................................................................ 14-35
14B-1/Water Quality of Selected Existing Production Wells ................................................. 14-37
14B-2/Well 2 Sampling Results ......................................................... .................................... 14-38
15.A-1/Soil Descriptions and Interpretations ...........................................................................15-1
17.A-1/Potable/Non-Potable Water Demand .......................................................................... 17-1
17.A-2/Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands .....................................................17-2
17.A-3/Estimated Irrigated Acreage ........................................................................ ................ 17-2
17.C-1/Existing Wells at Proposed Ave Maria DRI.................................................................. 17-7
18.A-1/Projected Wastewater Generation By Phase .............................................................. 18-1
19.C-1/Drainage Areas............................... .................................... ......................................... 19-2
19-4/Stage/Storage ..... ....... ... .................................................................................................. 19-4
20.A-1/Estimated Solid Waste Generation.............................................................................. 20-2
20.A-2/Anticipated Benefits of the Recycling Program............................................................ 20-2
21-1/Development Parameters....... ................................................................ ......................... 21-2
21-2/1ntersections Analyzed.................... ................................................................................ 21-4
21-3/Existing Roadway Conditions (Published Service Volumes)........................................... 21-6
21-4/Existing Roadway Conditions (Unpublished Service Volumes)....................................... 21-7
21-5/lntersection Capacity Analysis, Existing 2004 Traffic Conditions.
PM Peak Hour/Peak Season...........................................................................21-8
21-6/Committed Roadway Improvements ...... ......................................................................... 21-9
21-7/Development Parameters.............................................................................................. 21-10
21-8fTrip Generation Phase 1 (2011 )....................................................................................21-11
21-9fTrip Generation Buildout (2016) ....................................................................................21-12
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01'_ MPERRY
c_,
03786-013-QOO.-PDRI-28423
iv
8e
i~
LIST OF TABLES, (continued)
Table/Description
Paqe Number
21-10rrrip Generation Comparison. Net New External Daily Trips .......................................21-13
21-11/1ntemal/External Split - Vehicle Trips.......................................................................... 21-17
21-121Phase 1 (2011) Future Conditions Without Project..................................................... 21-19
21-13/Buildout (2016) Future Conditions Without Project ..................................................... 21-20
21-14/Phase 1 (2011) Future Conditions With Project.......................................................... 21-21
21-15/Buildout (2016) Future Conditions With Project.......................................................... 21-22
21-16/Phase 1 (2011) Intersection Capacity Analysis ........................................................... 21-23
21-17/Buildout (2016) Intersection Capacity Analysis ........................................................... 21-24
21-18/Phase 1 (2011) Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements.................................... 21-26
21-19/Buildout (2016) Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements .................................... 21-26
21-20/Phase 1 (2011) Recommended Intersection Improvements....................................... 21-28
21-21/Buildout (2016) Recommended Intersection Improvements ....................................... 21-29
21-221Entrance Roads Daily and Peak Hour Peak Direction Volumes ................................. 21-32
24.A-1/Dwelling Units Within the Community .......................................................................... 24-1
24.A-2IT arget Market................................................................................... ........................... 24-2
27.A-1/School Age Children By Level...................................................................................... 27-1
28.A-1/Project Demand for Health Care Facilities................................................................... 28-1
7/2312004. 135516 Ver: OJ!- MPERRY
~
0378l>-Ol3-000-PDRI-28423
v
LIST OF EXHIBITS
r
8e
""
ExhibiVDescription
Paae Number
21-1/Study Area......... ....................................... ....................................................................... 21-3
21-21lnternal Trip Capture - Phase 1 (2011).......................................................................... 21-15
21-3/1ntemal Trip Capture - Buildout (2016) ......................................................................... 21-16
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 011_ MPfRRY
,-
03786-013-000.-PDRI.2lM23
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
FiQure/Descriotion
PaQe Number
14A-1/Topography of Northern Collier County ......................................................................14-13
14A-21Generalized Hydrogeology Beneath Collier County.................................................... 14-14
14A-3/Transmissivity in the Water Table Aquifer ..................................................................14-15
14A-4/Thickness of the Tamiami Confining Layer................................................................. 14-16
14A-5/Transmissivity in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer ............................................................. 14-17
14A-6/Transmissivity in the Sandstone Aquifer..................................................................... 14-18
17C-1/Map Showing Locations of Existing Agricultural Production Wells ............................. 17-12
7/23/2()()4.. 135516 Vel: 01!_ MPERRY
~.,
03786-013-0D0-PDRI.211423
vii
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
8e
....
AttachmenUDescription
Paqe Number
4-1/Disclosure of Interest.............................................................................................................. 6
4-21Consent and Appointment of Agent ....................................................................................... 7
4-3/0ther Lands Owned Within Y:, Mile Radius .......................................................................... 11
5-1/Legal Description... ............................................................................................................... 14
17.E-1/Letter from Ave Maria Utility Company. LLLP ............................................................17-13
20.C-1/Letter from Linda Collins of Immokalee Disposal Company........................................ 20-5
25.B-1/Letter to Jeff Page. Collier County EMS ...................................................................... 25-3
25.B-21Letter to Immokalee Fire Control District ..................................................................... 25-4
25.B-3/Letter to Sheriff Don Hunter. Collier County Sheriff ..................................................... 25-5
27.C-1/Letter to Dave Lesansky, Collier County Public Schools ............................................. 27-2
28.A-1/Letter from Edward Morton. CEO. NCH Healthcare System ....................................... 28-2
30-1/Letter from Janet Matthews to Ross Morton ................................................................... 30-3
30-2/Letter from Frederick Gaske to Marion Almy .................................................................. 30-5
30-3/Letter from Frederick Gaske to David Genson................................................................ 30-6
7/2312004_ 135516 Ver. 011_ MPERRY
-
03786-01:J.-OOO-PDRI.28423
viii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 21-1
Transportation Methodology and Supplement Pre-Application Document
dated May 25.2004
Appendix 21-2
Transportation Detailed Intersection Capacity Analyses and Traffic County
Data Using SYNCHRO Version 6 Software
Note: Due to the size of the documentation, transportation appendices are not included
herein. Separate copies have been provided to the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council and Collier County.
7/23/2004- 135516 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
c_
0378fi-013-000-PDR~28423
ix
8 C . ~
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive - Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
RPM-BSP-ADA-1
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES
PART I. Application Information.
1. I, Blake Gable . the undersigned owner/authorized agent of New Town
Develooment. LLLP . hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact
as defined in Section 380.06. Florida Statutes (F.S.). and Chapter 28-24. Florida
Administrative Code (FAC.). In support thereof I submit the following information
concerning The Town of Ave Maria. which information is true and correct to the best
of my knowledge.
ignature of 0 er or
Authorized Agent
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 011- MPERRY
c_,
03786-01J..-OOO-PDRI.26423
1
80
2. Owner/Developer (name, address, phone). State whether or not the owner or
developer is authorized to do business in the State of Florida pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 607, F.S.
New Town Development, LLLP
2600 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, FL 34105
New Town Development is a Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership and is authorized
to do business pursuant to Chapter 607. F.S.
3. Authorized Agent and Consultants (name, address, phone).
Leqal Counsel (Authorized Aqent)
George L. Varnadoe. Esq.
Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson
821 Fifth Avenue South
Suite 201
Naples. Florida 34102
Telephone: 239-261-9300
Fax: 239-261-9782
E-mail: qlvarnadoe@naoleslaw.com
Land Use Planninq and Community Resources
Alan D. Reynolds. AICP. Chairman and CEO
Margaret Perry. AICP
Anita Jenkins. AICP
Sharon Jenkins-Owen. AICP
Steve Beyer, ASLA
WilsonMiller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: alrevnolds@wilsonmiller.com
marqaretoerrv@wilsonmiller.com
anitaienkins@wilsonmiller.com
siowen@wilsonmiller.com
stevebever@wilsonmiller.com
712312004.135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
C~
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
2
8e
,
~1
Environmental Resources
Timothy P. Durham, P.E.
Bruce K. Johnson, PhD
WilsonMiller, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples. FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: timdurham@wilsonmiller.com
bruceiohnson@wilsonmiller.com
Enoineerino. Potable Water. Waste Water. Stormwater
John English. P.E.
Craig Pajer, P.E.
WilsonMiller. Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200
Naples. FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: iohnenolish@wilsonmiller.com
craiopaier@wilsonmiller.com
Enoineerino, Water
Kirk Martin. P.E.
Gordon Kennedy. P.E.
COM Missimer
9311 College Parkway. Suite 1
Fort Myers. FL 33919
Telephone: 239-432-9494
Fax: 239-432-9453
E-mail: martinwk@cdm.com
kennedvop@cdm.com
Transportation
Jeffory Perry, AICP
Gavin Jones, P.E., AICP
WilsonMiller. Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
Telephone: 239-649-4040
Fax: 239-643-5716
E-mail: ieffperrv@wilsonmiller.com
oaviniones@wilsonmiller.com
7/2312004-135516 Ver.Ol1.MPERRY
CAIM3
037l\6.-013-OQO.PDRI-28423
3
Demoqraphic and Economic
Hank Fishkind. PhD
Stan Geberer
Fishkind and Associates. Inc.
11869 High Tech Terrace
Orlando. FL 32817
Telephone: 407-382-3256
Fax: 407-382-3254
E-mail: hankf@fishkind.com
stanq@fishkind.com
Archaeoloqist
Jodi Pracht
Archaeological Consultants. Inc.
8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A
Sarasota. FL 34240
Telephone: 941-379-6206
Fax: 941-379-6216
712312004- 135516 Ver. 011- MPERRY
~~
037/l6.-013-000-PDRf.-26423
8e
"'..J
~,
4
4.
Be
Attach a notarized authorization from all persons or corporations (or authorized
agents of said persons or corporations) having fee simple or lessor estate in the
site indicating that each of these parties is aware of, and concurs with, the
development of this property as described in this Application for Development
Approval. Include the names and addresses of all parties with an interest in the
property. In addition, include descriptions of any other properties within one-half
mile radius of the DRI site in which any of the parties with an interest in the DRI site
hold a fee simple or lessor interest.
:""'f
The 4995 acres that comprise the Town of Ave Maria are currently owned by the Barron
Collier Partnership. a Florida general partnership. and Barron Collier Investments. Ltd.. a
Florida limited partnership. Attachment 4-1 lists all of the partners in the two partnerships
that currently own all of the property within Ave Maria. Ave Maria University will ultimately
own and develop the approximately 950 acres that will constitute the university. New
Town Development, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership will be the developer
of Ave Maria. with the exception of the university.
Attachment 4-2 is a notarized Consent demonstrating the authorization of the Barron
Collier Partnership and Barron Collier Investments. Ltd.. to the filing of this ADA and the
development of the Town of Ave Maria. Also included in response to this question
(Attachment 4-3) are legal descriptions of the other properties owned by either the
partnership or the individual partners of the Barron Collier Partnership and Barron Collier
Investments, Ltd., which are within one-half mile radius of the site.
5. Attach a legal description ofthe development site. Include section, township and
range.
Attachment 5-1 is the legal description of the development site.
6. Have you requested a binding letter of interpretation of DRI status or vested rights,
clearance letter, agreement or preliminary development agreement from the
Department of Community Affairs? If so, what is the current status of this
determination?
New Town Development, LLLP, Barron Collier Investments. Ltd.. Barron Collier
Partnership, and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs entered into a
preliminary development agreement (PDA) on March 17, 2004; recorded in Official
Records of Collier County, Florida; O.R. Book 3533, Pages 2482-2488 on April 2, 2004.
7. List all local governments with jurisdiction over the proposed development.
Collier County
Ave Maria Stewardship Community District
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: Ol!- MPERRY
-,
0378&-Ol3-000-PDRI-26423
5
ATTACHMENT 4-1
Disclosure of Interest
r
Be
".f
New Town Development. LLLP--A Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership-
Owned by:
General Partner: Nua Baile, LLC ("NBLLC") .05%
Limited Partner: Thomas S. Monaqhan Irrevocable Grantor Trust of 2003
("TSMIGT") 49.95%
General Partner: Barron Collier Corporation .05%
Limited Partner: BCAM. LLLP 49.95%
Nua Baile. LLC--A Florida Limited Liability Company--Is a single member LLC that is owned by
Thomas S. Monaqhan Irrevocable Grantor Trust of 2003 ("TSMIGT"). TSMIGT
is a grantor trust created by Mr. Monaghan, and the discretionary beneficiaries are Thomas S.
Monaghan. Ave Maria University, and any charitable affiliate of Ave Maria University.
BCAM. LLLP--A Florida Limited Liability Limited Partnership--Owned by:
Limited Partner: Barron Collier Partnership
General Partner: Barron Collier Corporation
Barron Collier Corporation--A Florida S Corporation--Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul. Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan,
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier. Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/k/a Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Partnership--A Florida General Partnership--Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul. Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan.
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier, Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/k/a Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Investments. Ltd. - A Florida Limited Partnership - Owned by:
Barron G. Collier III
Katherine G. Sproul, Juliet A. Sproul and Jennifer S. Sullivan,
as Trustees for Trust Under Will of Barron Collier. Jr.
Lamar Gable
Frances G. Villere
Phyllis G. Alden (f/k/a Phyllis G. Doane)
Donna G. Keller
Barron Collier Corporation--Officers:
President--Paul J. Marinelli
Vice President--David K. Borden
Secretary-Treasurer--Bradley A. Boaz
6
99.90%
.10%
25.00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
25.00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
25.00%
25.00%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
12.50%
8 C :~"tf
Attachment 4-2
CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
This Consent and Appointment of Agent is made this :lY!1 day X~ ' 2004,
by Barron Collier Partnership, a Florida general partnership, and Barron Collie~ Investments,
Ltd.. a Florida limited partnership (hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Owner") which have a
mailing address of 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples. Florida 34105.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Barron Collier Partnership and Barron Collier Investments. Ltd.. own
approximately 4,995 acres of undeveloped land (hereinafter referred to as the "Property")
located in Collier County, Florida. which land is more particularly described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, Owner intends to carry out development on the Property that will require the
filing of an Application for Development Approval (ADA) with Collier County and other agencies
or govemmental entities to develop the Property as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
pursuant to Section 380.06 Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS. Owner plans to develop the Property as a DRI. to be known as the Town of
Ave Maria, which will require the designation of the Property as a Stewardship Receiving Area
by Collier County, and will also require approvals or actions by other governmental entities or
agencies of the State of Florida, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and agencies of Collier
County; and
WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of acknowledging of Owner consent to the development
of the Property and appointment of agents to represent it in preparing applications and in
obtaining any and all governmental approvals necessary to develop the Property in the manner
intended by the Owner and to authorize said agents to act on the Owner's behalf with full
authority to obtain all such approvals, including a DRI development order and the designation of
the Property as described in Exhibit A as a Stewardship Receiving Area. and to represent the
Owner in all dealings, negotiations. and hearings necessary to effectuate the development plan
for the Property.
NOW. THEREFORE, Owner, in order to acknowledge its consent to develop the
Property as a DRI and to authorize and direct its agents and representatives to act on its behalf
to apply for and obtain necessary governmental and agency approvals for the designation and
development of the Property, hereby authorizes and directs the following:
APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
1. Owner hereby appoints George L. Varnadoe of the law firm of Cheffy,
Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson, whose address is 821 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 201. Naples,
Florida 34102, and Alan D. Reynolds of WilsonMiller, Inc., whose address is 3200 Bailey Lane,
Suite 200, Naples. Florida 34105, as the authorized and duly designated agents/representatives
of Owner, with full authority to act on Owner's behalf to perform all legal services and planning
services, respectively, related to the preparation, submission and review of any applications
needed to obtain approval and implementation of Owner's ADA and Stewardship Receiving
Area for the Property.
7
r 8e
'.
.~
~
2. George L. Varnadoe of the law firm of Cheffy, Passidomo, Wilson and Johnson
and Alan Reynolds of WilsonMiller, Inc., are authorized to act as agents for Owner, with full
authority of Owner, before any and all governmental bodies. including any agencies of the local,
state and federal governments as may be appropriate and reasonably related to obtaining
approval of proposed development on the Property, including obtaining a DRI development
order and Stewardship Receiving Area designation on the Property. The agencies or entities
before whom the agents are authorized to represent Owner's interests may include, but shall
not be limited to the following:
a. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners and all departments, divisions and
sub-units of Collier County.
b. The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
c. The Florida Secretary of State and all other Cabinet-level offices and agencies.
d. The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council.
e. The Florida Departments of Community Affairs, Environmental Protection and
Transportation.
f. The Florida land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.
g. The South Florida Water Management District.
h. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
AS EVIDENCE OF ITS CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS named above,
the Owner, by and through its duly authorized representative, has signed this consent and
appointment below.
Wo~ {j. 0/wv
Signature /
C4<W'-1,v ,4. Sff4w
Printed Name
OWNER:
00,<11 01. ~. t:J( A/JA--
Signature
TrzISf+A. A, MEes
Printed Name
R
s~~ tlA~
cA4clLyiJ .4- JIff4<J
Printed Name
~~.~EJ
Signature
J12.IS I-t A A.. Al8r;?S
Printed Name
STATE OF FL
COUNTY OF 'cil..-l..-IG"R--
-,e.
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this <2lJ day of
'Iv /...'l ,2004 by PAUL J. MARINELLI, as Administrative Agent for BARRON
COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, a Florida General partnershiP~. JJ
_AJ(/1.~
:0,\\\""111, Susan L. Maturo .
'-m':s-\SI.yp, <,. CommlIoim.CC9671S7 Notary Public . I
L .~ IbJ*8I Oct. 15,2004 Name: SV~fI"fJ L. tnfJ.1iJtb
~....\ r$." Boaded nu.
....:;,JOFf'$t..l _ Jl<lo<Ilng Co., \De. Certificate No.
'''nO' My Commission Expires:
By:
~a~~
lamar Gable
A General Partner
8e
,..I
..~
STATE OF F7-
COUNTY OF (!p, "--I-I Ff.......
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this .2o"if. day of
:J/) L ~ . 2004 by lamar Gable. a General Partner of BARRON COLLIER
PARTNE SHIP, a Florida General Partnership.
~rt~
\\l~IIt'" Suaan L. Maturo
#m.s."-lvp ~\(''''''''''''''''CC9671S7
~..' . a IbJ*8I Oct. 15,2004
~~ !!tl?$ Boadod TMl
~{1Mf~~ AtiaIIUe BoMinB c.., u..
"#tlirt'\\
Notary Public
Name: s-u~A1J L fhR7IJ4J
Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
q
8('
u \1
1MZ!:;;:aA_
Signature A d A. )
CMULjtJ tJ ('t. ,sf"fN'"
Printed Name
OWNER:
'" '1~ 1. tlJD"
Signature 1\ ~
--re.15M /-\ - ~e~
Pri~d Name
(!~ 0. Aftl-<V
Signature J A . u . J
e,.q.<Ol..Y It' s:~
Printed Name
~S\U ~. 6JU:ir-
Signature
-re.iS~p... ~- ~JL8eS
Printed Name
ER INVESTMENTS D.
ship
By:
~~
Lamar Gable
A General Partner
STATE OF FL
COUNTY OF OJt-!-.IOC-
-/(.
The foregoing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this d-IJ day of
Tu L t ' 2004 by PAUL J. MARINELLI, as Administrative Agent for BARRON
COLLIE INVESTMENTS. LTD.. a Florida Limited Partnership. /J
~ ....r.-. ~(fl~
!~ ~CommiIakII1.a::9671S7 N t ~
:~\ .;= B:qJiNI Oa&. 15,2004 0 ary r ,,~ I L Ih /1 P;;'
<-"ili ~.l - .,.,. Name: >f17J. n Tv r---u
""IP,~I~"""" A1IantIa lloodq at.. 1-. Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
FL
COUNTYOF (/')Ll-/~
The fO~Oing Consent and Appointment of Agent was executed before me this ~ *- day of
.... Vl-,/ .2004 by Lamar Gable, a General Partner of BARRON COLLIER
INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership.
~(}?Il~
Notary Public
Name: SUSA--N L IhA70/!.b
Certificate No.
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF
",111'"" Susan L. Maturo
..,"~tI.'f PIJ. I,
i~"'A"--",%?~Co~'OC96n~
., ,., l.: E:qMlI oat. 15,2004
>~-;}''''' '@;;.t::...::: BoodId ..
....,If OF .P.:".....'" A1JaDtic BaodIDC CIt.. b&
'lilli'
1n
ATTACHMENT 4-3
OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURES
WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF THE DRI BOUNDARY
WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
The following map with folio numbers is cross-referenced to ownership disclosure and
legal descriptions found in the attached table. The ownership disclosures are within Yz
mile of the Town of Ave Maria. The applicant and partners with the applicant are listed
as Barron Collier Investments LId (including Collier, Margurite R.), Barron Collier -
Partnership, Peninsula Improvement Corporation, Silver Strand III Partnership, Pacific
Collier Partnership (including Immokalee Vegetable Growers), and Noblis Collier.
11
Be
,"
"(
.'ll:
-
-l ~o
0
:E ~
I
Z
0 0
."
~ 0 0
0.
m r
~ CD
0 ..... 0 CO
)> " .. i!! CD
:l:: m
:;c il ~ .. ::I
)> ::I ;;r 0 a.
CD ... c
iil ;0 il.
~ m
:T " .:<!
-0' I\,) 0
:l:: ~
;:+
:T CD
:r en
~
-
'"
~ ~
<D
Q.. ~ f;
I I
;:
0 W m
z
:;c ...
12
r 8 C
....
.
z
o
;::
..
"'
o
U>
w
C
..J
<l:
"
W
..J
:;: ~ :;:
00 _ 00
L1.~W LL
o.......u.. 0
:::tC>O :!
......a..N '
:;:0'" :;:
~ ~~?;_ ~:; m C/)
o -v......"'1' C> C> N :i
o ;::0::;:: 0... 0.. N
(J) ~o~ 0 0 C> ~
~ ~E~"<t ~ ~ @ ~
en '<:1""'_;:: 0:: 0::: to "<t
en ;::O::~5: 0 0 Z ;::
~ Wzowcn ..,;..,; .:t Wz
OU)l.L 0 0 W
i:: U.~LLO '<t V Z LL
...... 00::0..,. "C!) LL 0
t9 ~O~;:: 0.. 0.. 0 ~
~ C;;g~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
g ":3!-...... -.q-LL U (f.) ~
......'It"WC9;::O o::~o:: :> (f.)W
o::;::za...W~ 0......0 ~ Wz
O5:LLOZ...... r--:W,...: L- =u..
wzogu..Z.:!(J)...tQ) 4:.:.:.0
(/) 'V..-O"';..-M;:::M ......
wLL__ "<t-S:CJ>C> "ow::!
....JOw~;::~cna..~o.. UJo::(/)w
:g;!ZO~Zu..gLLg fD(/)l1.Z
....:;LL..z U-Ol./')OlD ~<(OLL
c>>O-ll..o:::t"-'V""" WUJ~O
5: o..C/)voOv......o::;::o:: ....J~......'<t
0:: o~;::CI):::t;::~05:O "';0..5:;::
o ww.....> "(/) - -:::2: w
en (J)NCf)OS:>LLD 0 ......~OCf)
en .....;::..,;~(f)ZOO::LLO:: 5uZ..,;5:
W 0::00.;::'0 -(J)NCI)Ocn Z <(:;::0::
~ O'<tww:::tCf);::~~<( LL~:::tWCf)
uu:::t C/);::ZCf)w~ZW"",w mow....zU)
~<(~ ~5LLLLZ~..,;~Z~ ~~....JWLL~
o~C/) ....JZOOLL~;::O"~O" C>~ ZO""'"
~IO -u.."<tZQ 3:::2....::2 [L105LL'<t-
55~~~O~Q~ffiCf)~5~ RZ~O~~
Cf)~~(f)o~~~~~~~~~ (J)~~~~~
~wg~~~o2..,;w'<twOw ~~~goo
....J..J'<t :::!: N ;::---I;::....J::'t...J _ _ -;>-N('\I
~jN~~"";::~5j5j""jjjjj....J;::;::
....J<(5.....<(5zIZ<(z<(5<(<(<(<(<(Wzw
<(ro(J)Cf)Q)C/)(J)~Q)mmmZmmrommoomoo
OONNmNmNmNNNNmNNNNNNNN
NOO~NooN~N~~~~N~~~~oooo~ro
oo~~~~~~ro~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~Noo~ro~o~omm~~~~~ro~~OM
~~~ID~~M~MNNN~N~MN~~M~
:;:
00
00
W
..J
OJ
"'
C"')
.....
00 0000 0 0 00
~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~~~~~~a~~a~a~aooa~oooo~
~~I~~~~II~I~I~I~II~~I
ww~wwwwOO~wOO~~~OOw~~wwoo
~~~~~~~~~~~w~w~~~~~~~
~~w~~~~ww~wzwzw~ww~~w
~~zoo~oo~zZ~Z~Z~Zoozz~wz
<<ww~wwww~~w~~~~~w~~ww~
w>>~>>>>~~>~~~~~>~~>>~
Z~~~~~~~aa~a~~~~~~~~~a
:;:o~~~~~~~~~~~=~=~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~o~o~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~z~z~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ooooooooooo~o~ooooooo
uoooouoouoo~u~ouuuuou
zzzzzzzzzzz~z~zzzzzzz
ooooooooooo~o~ooooooo
~~~~~~~~~~~w~w~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mwwwwmmmmmm~mwmmmmmmm
O~~M~Nom~ro~~ID~mM~MIDOM
000000000000000000000
OONOOOO~~O~ONOOOOO~ON
zg~ggggggg~~ggg~gggggg
~~~R~R~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~~
NNNNNNMNMMMMN~M~MNNMN
NNNNNN~N~~~~N~~~~NN~N
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
z
o
~~Nro~ro~o~omm~~~~~o~MOM
o ~~ ~ M MNNN NMM ~~M~
W
lJ)
W
~zrorommmmmmmmmmmmmroomromro
~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNN
..
;:
~rorororororo~ro~~~~ro~~~ororo~ro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
c
>-
Attachment si1 8 C
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18.
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47
SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WilstinMiller"
..
New mrections In Planning, Design & Engineering
'..
, .
.
J
,
ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 4 THROUGH 9 AND SECTIONS 16 THROUGH 18, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTIONS 31 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH,
RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICUlARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING ATTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16:
THENCE NORTH 01"04'10" WEST SO.OO FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OIL WELL
ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN
DESCRIBED;
THENCE SOUTH 88*57'06" WEST 152.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 *07'23" WEST 300.01 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 300 FEET NORTH OF
AN PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID OIL WELL ROAD:
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88*57'05" WEST 2,417.56 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 88"55'37" WEST 1,128.15 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 01"13'46" WEST 1,089.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"32'56" WEST 1,514.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"24'19" WEST 3977.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00*01'40" EAST 1280.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" EAST 1125.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00*19'38" WEST 520.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09*27'56" EAST 38.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"56'15" EAST 32.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"02'49" EAST 24.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68*12'25" EAST 33.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73*08'54" EAST 72.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"14'09" EAST 65.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 61*11'56" EAST 47.93 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 56"44'10" EAST 80.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54"18'17" EAST 82.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 51*34'19" EAST 552.31 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 12*32'03" EAST 52.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"41'34" WEST 780.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38"40'18" WEST 48.27 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 55*58'45" WEST 175.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"14'12" WEST 46.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86*41'17" WEST 358.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43*16'35" WEST 44.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01"28'53" WEST 584.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88"45'30" EAST 2.256.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"31'40" WEST 679.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29"57'19" EAST 43.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80"03'11" EAST 7SO.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82*05'14" EAST 23.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"45'48" WEST 831.15 FEET;
THENCE 82.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 128.55 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36"53'11" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 23*30'23" EAST 81.34 FEET TO A POINT
OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE 149.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE WEST, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 215.80 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39"48'43" SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS NORTH 22"02'37" EAST 146.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02*08'16" EAST 434.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38"40'13" EAST 124.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23*55'58" EAST 503.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89"19'06" EAST 272.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81*10'42" EAST 718.98 FEET;
Offices strategically located to serve our clients 800.649.4336
NaplesJCorporate Office 3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200" Naptes. Florida 34105 . 239,649.4040 . Fax 239,643.5716
Page 1 oft 0
3/512(J1M..12723O Vw:01I-BSTOCl<HAM wllsonmiller.com
-
""......,....
Wi/sonMiII.If,Jnc. -;t. ~c, ie-COGOllO
WilstinMille,"
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
".1
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36.
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COlliER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT"N - D.R.I. llANOS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 09*56'39" EAST 638.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"36'58" EAST 172.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10"53'22" EAST 171.73 FEET;
THENCE 327.51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.44 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 68"07'37" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 39*53'35" WEST 308.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73"57'24" WEST 492.85 FEET;
THENCE 31321 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 331.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54"05'52" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 90"00'00" WEST 301.71 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62*57'04" WEST 506.32 FEET;
THENCE 155.39 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 107.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83'01'31" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 27"09'30" WEST 142.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14'21'16" EAST 287.88 FEET;
THENCE 341.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 168.89 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 115*44'01"
AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 29"11'23" WEST 286.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87*03'24" WEST 81.50 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 19'06'00" WEST 176.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"34'35" WEST 263.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 33"42'00" WEST 61.66 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51'52'05" WEST 1,402.26 FEET;
THENCE 219.21 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 151.50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82'54'07" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 22"50'26" WEST 200.58 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16'36'35" EAST 1,047.10 FEET;
THENCE 196.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66'04'00" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46"32'34" EAST 166.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 61'34'34" EAST 1n.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14'02'26" EAST 106.97 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 15'53'24" WEST 33.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 72'16'06" WEST 341325.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16'22'40" WEST 666.64 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 16"02'21" WEST 1,001.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15*43'23" WEST 606.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"29'42" WEST 215.30 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 02*51'21" WEST 51.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37*59'19" EAST 51.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58*24'39" EAST 660.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56'56'25" EAST 665.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 62'27'21" EAST 303.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58*11'43" EAST 148.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66*27'20" EAST 99.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79"59'44" EAST 60.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18'39'40" EAST 212.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13*26'09" EAST 80.67 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 04*05'14" EAST 65.75 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'47'26" EAST 593.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05'29'40" EAST 61.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20"17'22" EAST 57.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 51'55'17" EAST 55.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84'48'27" EAST 51.76 FEET'
THENCE SOUTH 67"53'53" EAST 40.46 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 53"37'33" EAST 55.29 FEET;
Page 2oClO
15
315/2004. t27230 Vrr. 011- BSTOO<I1AM
-
.",...,...,.,..
WilstinMiller"
r
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
'.
.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST. AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R!. UANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE SOUTH 55*37'37" EAST 158.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66"28'32" EAST 79.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81*19'48" EAST 69.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80*53'08" EAST 96.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83"09'35" EAST 88,49 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75"58'08" EAST 57.96 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 45*44'09" EAST 65,43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 23"12'23" EAST 107.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 31"09'29" EAST 124.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 36"28'03" EAST 195.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41"49'01" EAST 193.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41"27'57" EAST 187.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 50"06'28" EAST 177.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"06'03" EAST 103.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82"07'11" EAST 76.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58"49'02" EAST 61.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41"11'10" EAST 266.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"45'15" EAST 203.61 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 63"26'06" EAST 230.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 55"12'54" EAST 17.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06"58'17" WEST 40.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60*20'46" EAST 94.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"42'46" EAST 42.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"22'08" EAST 29.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05"13'18" EAST 37.01 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 07*13'16" WEST 185.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08"55'50" WEST 66.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08*35'26" WEST 70.11 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03"30'28" EAST 24.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09"22'28" EAST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32"03'11" EAST 61.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41*59'52" EAST 54.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"38'59" EAST 44.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 40*19'34" EAST 80,40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39"30'46" EAST 42,43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"07'39" EAST 71.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60"17'11" EAST 55.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68"43'34" EAST 63.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"12'19" EAST 41.51 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75"32'58" EAST 74.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"55'50" EAST 42.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"31'07" EAST 36.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"37'20" EAST 34.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 72"08'39" EAST 57,43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"52'50" EAST 70.22 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56"52'18" EAST 99.31 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70"35'59" EAST 56.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"12'15" EAST 70.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85"47'37" EAST 52.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64"20'23" EAST 9,49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23"58'25" EAST 60,47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39"27'42" EAST 136.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18"12'03" EAST 123.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16*26'30" WEST 137.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"55'34" WEST 133.51 FEET;
Page 3 oflO
Y.iI2IOO4-12J'23ll Ver:OlI-BSTOCKHAt.4
-
-.,
16
WilSlinMiller'
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
4.
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9. 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36.
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH. RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.I. llANOS lCONTINUEDj,
THENCE NORTH 84"43'21" WEST 101.26 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 87*06'53" WEST 375.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86"31'55" WEST 296.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02"29'11' WEST 25.06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"19'00" WEST 63.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87*01'35" WEST 57.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85*14'11" WEST 27.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86"11'09" WEST 22.51 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 71"01'47" WEST 25.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"57'44" WEST 25.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80"42'24" WEST 41.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"00'19" WEST 49.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78"26'56" WEST 104.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78*45'16" WEST 195.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79"21'51" WEST 81.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76*30'15" WEST 38.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70'33'36" WEST 13.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53"58'21' WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53"58'22" WEST 10.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43*09'08" WEST 16.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34"52'31" WEST 30.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37*08'48' WEST 31.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 37.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"28'45" WEST 29.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52'29'45" WEST 40.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53*28'16" WEST 25.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"51'49" WEST 23.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72"53'50" WEST 40.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"38'02" WEST 101.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76"25'14" WEST 79.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73*50'34" WEST 83.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77*16'32" WEST 71.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70"44'15" WEST 32.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75"44'50" WEST 240.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76"22'29" WEST 54.20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75*46'41" WEST 12.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 78*06'45" WEST 243.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"32'28" WEST 438.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86'36'21" WEST 1,109.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77*00'11" WEST 142.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 17"30'03" WEST 10.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21"30'05" EAST 36.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 30"57'50" WEST 6.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'10'43" WEST 139.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"46'06" WEST 25.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05"42'38" WEST 20.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04*23'55" WEST 13.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50"11'40" WEST 8.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83"59'28" WEST 19.73 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 84*57'27" WEST 35.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83"49'48" WEST 38.44 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 80"44'23" WEST 96.27 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 79"48'04" WEST 449.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"49'57" WEST 284.20 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83*39'35" WEST 93.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87"39'46" WEST 101.30 FEET;
Page 40fl0
31512004- t2n3O Ver.. 011- BSTOCIOW.4
-
_..
17
WilstinMillei
y
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
....
.,
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST. AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COlLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT 'A' - DR!. lIANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 84*25'40" WEST 85.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"28'16" WEST 95.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77*23'45" WEST 170.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75'57'50" WEST 76.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69*26'38" WEST 35.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69"46'31" WEST 41.82 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48*48'50" WEST 43.91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"14'43" WEST 134.40 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"58'24" WEST 611.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45"00'00" WEST 338.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44*41'45" WEST 412.62 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 43"26'06" WEST 267.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46"27'29" WEST 200.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"02'14" EAST 12.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81"52'12" EAST 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03"20'45" EAST 73.83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85"25'42" WEST 6.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00* WEST 10.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70"27'48" WEST 16.99 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56*18'36" WEST 14.89 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 75"57'49" WEST 17.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87*16'25" WEST 10.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59"20'58" WEST 16.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35"32'16" WEST 17.77 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 26"33'54" WEST 17.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16"11'21" WEST 16.67 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 *52'04" WEST 47.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"05'16" WEST 336.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"29'38" WEST 299.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"56'29" WEST 220.D1 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"52'19" EAST 237.57 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00"46'52" WEST 113.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00'00'00" EAST 13.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14"02'10" EAST 8.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45*00'00" EAST 5.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71"33'54" EAST 9.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'24'19" EAST 15.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89"12'02" EAST 222.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86*36'31" EAST 69.83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82"38'52" EAST 32.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70"49'16" EAST 25.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60"38'32" EAST 18.96 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62"44'41" EAST 38.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 73"08'30" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87"42'34" EAST 25.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86*18'31" EAST 32.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"58'54" EAST 43.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66"16'18" EAST 51.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56"01'25" EAST 57.29 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 52"34'43" EAST 171.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43*53'54" EAST 75.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"37'17" EAST 47.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35"48'12" EAST 77.68 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30"21'29" EAST 83.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 22"37'12" EAST 67.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13"36'02" EAST 32.94 FEET;
Page s octo
18
3I5f2OO4.. 1212JO Ver: 011- BSTOCI01,oI,u
-
037~.O
..
WilsDnMiller'
r
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
80
V
>!
.,~
''I:
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOlfTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS JO THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOlfTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNlY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT 'A' - D.R.I. L1ANDS (CONTINUED):
THENCE NORTH 14'28'13" EAST 66.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10'57'15" EAST 65.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11'18'36" EAST 21.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16'41'58" EAST 10.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45'00'00' EAST 10.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'23'33' EAST 15.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64'39'14* EAST 21.71 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67'47'47" EAST 163.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64'59'39' EAST 161.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66'22'14' EAST 18.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72'53'50" EAST 28.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" EAST 14.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88'18'55" EAST 35.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'36'10" EAST 42.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90'00'00" EAST 28.92 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82'45'47" EAST 16.40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 61'55'39" EAST 17.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'34'35" EAST 118.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'56'55" EAST 17.06 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'43'15" EAST 124.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13'46'19" WEST 328.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70*48'07" EAST 76.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54*29'06" EAST 37.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 21'53'45" WEST 54.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70*47'14" EAST 77.55 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 71'02'31" EAST 35.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72'16'21" EAST 131.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72*04'43" EAST 126.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'13'18" EAST 106.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71'11'17" EAST 74.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68'33'08" EAST 30.93 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71*33'54" EAST 17.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'15'14" EAST 13.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 83*05'20" EAST 17.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47'43'35" EAST 15.29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 37'20'58" EAST 24.58 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16*38'20" EAST 46.68 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 24'10'17" EAST 35.78 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21'52'45' EAST 70.36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34'33'45" EAST 28.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47'26'12' EAST 34.20 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52'25'53" EAST 8.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71'33'54" EAST 9.75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85'01'49" EAST 11.87 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87'08'15" EAST 20.59 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88'25'50' EAST 37.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87'33'48" EAST 48.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89'35'00" EAST 141.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89*06'34" EAST 99.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'31'51' EAST 48.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'20'00' EAST 26.97 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 79'46'40" EAST 31.87 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 76'27'51" EAST 28.56 FEET~OTHENCE NORTH 70'23'45" EAST 39.84 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 70'48'11' EAST 134.46 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70'37'19" EAST 79.02 FEET;
Page 6oflO
3I5I2OO4-t2123O Ytr.011-BSTOCKl-WoI
-
"""""".,
19
WilslinMille,"
y
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9.16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33. TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.I. lIANDS (CONTINUED),
THENCE NORTH 66"32'28" EAST 29.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 57'49'44" EAST 37.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53'21'57" EAST 74.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54'24'59" EAST 148.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50"50'35" EAST 203.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48'43'53" EAST 33.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32'23'52" EAST 31.67 FEET;
THENCE 334.86 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTiAl CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 272.48 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 70'24'48" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 06'25'03" WEST 314.18 FEET;
, THENCE NORTH 41"37'27" WEST 133.18 FEET;
THENCE 184.60 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWEST HAVING
A RADIUS OF 573.36 FEET THROUGH CENTRAl ANGLE OF 18*26'50" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY
A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 50"50'52" WEST 183.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60'04'16" WEST 149.32 FEET;
THENCE 44.34 FEET AlONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.99 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAl ANGLE OF 84"41'37" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 17'43'30" WEST 40.41 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24*37'19" EAST 671.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 23'58'37" EAST 211.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 27*45'05" EAST 100.63 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34*51'48" EAST 129.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36"14'23" EAST 119.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 39'15'14" EAST 61.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30'37'48" EAST 96.80 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31'09'42" EAST 136.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31'57'25" EAST 103.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32"39'03" EAST 134.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 28'32'24" EAST 53.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 31'15'49" EAST 35.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36'52'12" EAST 24.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 53'49'13" EAST 22.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59'30'01" EAST 46.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'16'35" EAST 70.87 FEET:
THENCE NORTH 46'49'06" EAST 48.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34'36'20" EAST 66.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 36*23'58" EAST 266.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35'28'00" EAST 51.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24"13'40" EAST 48.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20'29'50" EAST 62.60 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 17'32'36" EAST 44.54 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"02'07" EAST 134.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 09'20'41" EAST 65.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08*49'13" EAST 32.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02'07'16" WEST 14.81 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 19'58'59" WEST 12.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29"55'53" WEST 20.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45'00'00" WEST 56.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48'51'56" WEST 57.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42'38'48" WEST 28.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38'47'48" WEST 35.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43'25'04" WEST 39.03 FEET'
THENCE NORTH 36'22'11" EAST 30.93 FEET;'
THENCE NORTH 23'54'19" EAST 139.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66"53'26" EAST 241.46 FEET'
THENCE SOUTH 64'45'28" EAST 263.29 FEET:
Page 7ofJO
:sI5r.ZOO4-127Z30 Vw:.011.8ST0CKHAu
-
lD1&a-ooo.ooo-_o
20
WilsOnMiller"
~
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9,16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36.
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - DR!. L1ANDS (COI'ITINUED),
THENCE SOUTH 71'18'47" EAST 57.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 85*07'33" EAST 50.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'05'07" EAST 75.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'43'21" EAST 63.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64'57'08" EAST 36.24 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86*25'39" EAST 63.61 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81'31'21' EAST 262.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86*08'03" EAST 273.99 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80'58'13" EAST 327.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67"50'56" EAST 252.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81'02'01" EAST 819.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 81*42'41" EAST 310.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 65'34'43" EAST 80.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'59'47" EAST 219.16 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82'42'28' EAST 41.19 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 58'02'38" EAST 138.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 41'09'18" EAST 91.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 73'57'36" EAST 83.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 84'51'58" EAST 305.34 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86*38'43" EAST 343.90 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87'28'42' EAST 503.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 68'46'01" EAST 326.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37'30'20" EAST 357.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 15'32'08" EAST 149.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86'55'36' EAST 261.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72*53'31" EAST 576.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 50'45'14' EAST 202.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67'14'14" EAST 314.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76'38'32" EAST 143.08 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89'49'43" EAST 1,054.71 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 75*20'32" EAST 42.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41'43'41" EAST 38.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59'44'48" EAST 101.86 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 82'56'38- EAST 71.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'31'27" EAST 68.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60*32'45" EAST 175.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76"16'10" EAST 41.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89*26'30" EAST 460.22 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 62'52'57" EAST 62.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 59*26'46" EAST 47.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77"3f:/27" EAST 12.36 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70'55'29" EAST 16.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47"41'12" EAST 748.66 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 34'06'49" EAST 46.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14'16'24" EAST 615.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 65*5g44" EAST 160.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47"06'44" EAST 110.60 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29'11 '16" EAST 460.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 13'56'57" EAST 209.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76'19'41' EAST 160.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 61'43'54" EAST 107.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 16*58'36" EAST 69_73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01'36'49" WEST 341.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69'06'53" EAST 584.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CAMP KEIAS ROAD (60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00'14'32" EAST 45.99 FEET;
Page 8oflO
3l5I2OO4- tZ7230 Va-: Oil_ BSTOCKHAM
-
GS7llll-GOO-OOO-_o
21
Be
"'.f
~
WilsOnMillet
y
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
..
"
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17. TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT"N - D.R.I. llANOS (CONTINUED),
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT.OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 05"51'27" WEST 224.83 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 95.78 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,798.14 FEET
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01"26'42" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
SOUTH 05"04'45" WEST 95.78 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT -oF.WAY LINE SOUTH 26"31'54" WEST 759.71 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00"14'33" EAST 1.537.82 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00"22'10" EAST 2,347.87 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 89"29'01" EAST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CAMP KEIAS ROAD (80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 00"22'10" EAST 200.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 89*29'01" WEST 330.00 FEET TO A POINT ON
A LINE LYING 330 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST RIGHT.OF.WA Y LINE OF SAID
CAMP KEIAS ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE FOR THE FOLLOWING 9 COURSES:
1. SOUTH 00*22'10" EAST 62.31 FEET;
2. SOUTH 00*30'10" EAST 2,674.23 FEET;
3. SOUTH 00*35'31" EAST 2.684.53 FEET;
4. SOUTH 00*38'11" EAST 2,610.24 FEET;
5. SOUTH 00"30'34" EAST 199.67 FEET;
6. 227.68 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
3,032.95 FEET THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04"18'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02"39'36" EAST 227.63 FEET;
7. SOUTH 04"48'38" EAST 400.93 FEET;
8. SOUTH 05"08'04" EAST 83.53 FEET;
9. SOUTH 00"29'16" EAST 1672.20 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89"04'49" WEST 604.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47*03'54" WEST 98.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52"55'OS" WEST 8729 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06"39'26" WEST 102.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 "24'17" WEST 367.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 19"54'41" WEST 104.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43"05'38" WEST 251.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11"04'29" EAST 79.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05"51'31" WEST 66.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48"52'26" WEST 332.24 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74"56'35" WEST 80.29 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 74"58'06" WEST 235.65 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 51"40'42" WEST 93.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21"53'05" WEST241.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 77"21'09" WEST 341.17 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 60"48'05" WEST 79.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88*09'54" WEST 265.68 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89*36'53" WEST 1.997.38 FEET;
THENCE 77.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 739.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06*00'22" AND BEING
SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02"53'58" EAST 77.51 FEET'
THENCE SOUTH 00"38'28" EAST 84 34 FEET' '
THENCE NORTH 90"00'00" WEST 7'i .80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00*38'46" EAST 3,444.22 FEET;
THENCE 224.04 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE
WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,721.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04*43'02" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01*44'02" WEST 223.98 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04"05'59" WEST 217.57 FEET;
Page 9 oCto
3/5I2Ol)4.. 1V230 Vet; 011- 8STOC.l<HAM
-
"",""""",.,
22
WilstinMillef
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
Be
<01
DESCRIPTION OF PART OF SECTION 4 THROUGH 9, 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST, AND
PART OF SECTIONS 30 THROUGH 33, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 36,
TOWNHIP47 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FlORIDA
EXHIBIT "A" - D.R.1. L1ANDS lCONTINUED),
THENCE 153.40 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CIRCUlAR CURVE CONCAVE
EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,277.17 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03051'35" AND
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02010'28" WEST 153.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06034'56" EAST 1,190.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF SAID OIL WEll ROAD (100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY);
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 88054'34" WEST 256.81 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 4,995.0 ACRES. MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ;t ~UTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 16 BEING SOUTH 88054'34" WEST.
BY: 1f -e'? ~ ..P"
BRADLEY . STOCKHAM, P.S.M. LS#6390
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #LB-43
REF: 4H-125, SHEETS 1-5
DATE: AUGUST 29.2003
REVISIONS: 1. OCTOBER 16, 2003
2. MARCH 3, 2004
Page 10 oCto
23
~ 121230 'hi: Otl-BSTOCI<HAM
-
037l1&.QOO.OOO..O
8.
) Be
List all agencies (local, state and federal) from which approval and/or a permit must
be obtained prior to initiation of development. Indicate the permit or approval for
each agency and its status. Indicate whether the development is registered or
whether registration will be required with the Division of Florida Land Sales,
Condominiums and Mobile Homes under Chapter 478, Florida Statutes. Indicate
whether the development will be registered with the H.U.D., Division of Interstate
Land Sales Registration or with other states.
.
A. Collier County
1. DRI Development Order
2. SRA (Stewardship Receiving Area) Designation
4. Excavation Permit
5. Right-of-Way Permit
6. Site Development Plan Approval
7. Final Subdivision Plat Approval
8. Utility franchise and approval of water and sewer utility
~
B.
State of Florida
1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
a) General Permit for Wastewater Collection System
b) General Permit for Potable Water Distribution System
c) Wastewater Facility or Activity Permit Application Form 1 (Form
62-620.901 (1))
d) Wastewater Application Form 2A for a Domestic Wastewater
Facility Permit (Form 62-620.901(2))
e) Application For A Specific Permit To Construct PWS Components
(Form 62-555.900(1)
2. South Florida Water Management District
a) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
b) Consumptive Use Permit
c) Right-of-Way Permit
3. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
a) Potable Water
4. Florida Legislature
a) Creation of Chapter 189. Special District - signed by Governor in
June. 2004
C. Federal
1. Army Corps of Engineers
a) Individual Section 404 Permit
2.
Environmental Protection Agency
a) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit
712312004- 135516 Ver: 011_ MPERRY
c_,
03786-013-000. PORI. 28423
8-1
Be
~.,
PART II. General Section
QUESTION 9 - MAPS
The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map
should be detenmined at the preapplication conference.
MapA.
MapB.
MapC.
A general location map. Indicate the location of any urban service area boundaries
and regional activity centers in relation to the project site.
A recent vertical aerial photo of the site showing project boundaries which
reasonably reflects current conditions. Specify the date the photo was taken.
A topographic map with project boundaries identified (contour intervals from one to
five feet should be determined in consultation with the appropriate regional
planning council and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication conference).
Delineate 1 OO-year flood prone areas (including hurricane flood zones) and
indicate major land surface features. If applicable. delineate the coastal
construction control line.
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
MapD.
Map E.
Map F-1.
Map F-2.
MapG.
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
c_,
03786-013-CJOO.PDRI-28423
1.
In addition to the 1 OO-year flood delineation, Map C should depict the mean annual
flood and 25-year flood elevations (pre-development).
2.
A topographic map with project boundaries identified, delineating the mean annual.
25-year and 1 OO-year flood elevations after development.
A land use map showing existing and approved uses on and abutting the site. The
uses shown should include existing on-site land uses, recreational areas, utility and
drainage easements. wells, right-of-way, and historic, archaeological, scientific and
architecturally significant resources and lands held for conservation purposes.
A soils map of the site. with an identification of the source of the information. The
use of a source other than the most recently published U.S.DA Soil Conservation
Service (SCS) soil surveys should be determined in consultation with the
appropriate regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the
preapplication conference.
A vegetation associations map indicating the total acreage of each association,
based on the Level III vegetation types described in The Florida Land Use and
Cover Classification Svstem: A Technical Report, available from each regional
planning council.
A wetlands map showing the location and extent of areas that are jurisdictional
wetlands to SFWMD.
A location map of all transects, trap grids, or other sampling stations used to
determine the on-site status of significant wildlife and plant resources. Show
9-1
MapH.
Map 1-1.
Map 1-2.
MapJ.
7/23/2004- 135516 Ver. 011- MPERRY
c_,
037B6-013-000-PDRI-28423
location of all observed significant wildlife and plant resources, and show I~cata C
of suitable habitat for all significant resources expected to be on-site.
-.1
A master development plan for the site. Indicate proposed land uses and
locations. development phasing. major public facilities. utilities. preservation areas.
easements. right-of-way. roads, and other significant elements such as transit
stops, pedestrian ways, etc. This plan will provide the basis for discussion in
Question 10-A as well as other questions in the ADA.
Existing drainage map.
A master drainage plan for the site. Delineate existing and proposed: drainage
basins. flow direction. water retention areas. drainage structures, flow route offsite,
drainage easements. waterways. and other major drainage features. (This
information may be presented on two separate maps (existing and proposed), if
desired.)
A map of the existing highway and transportation network within the study area.
The study area includes the site, and locations of all transportation facilities which
are substantially impacted. This area should be finally defined on the basis of the
findings of the traffic impact analysis. including determinations of where the criteria
for a substantial impact are met. Map J will become the base for the maps
requested in Question 21.
9-2
-
.-...
,
m
<
m
;u
Gl
,
o
m
CD
r
<
30LDEN G E BLVD
Legend
~ SOOft Restoration Zone
D Open . Big Cypress National Forest
. Water Retention Area (WRA) . Area of Crilical State Concern
. Flowway Stewardship Area (FSA) III Stew.ardship ~ending Areas (SSA's)
. Habitat Stewardstllp Area (HSA) (Exllllng, Pendmg and Propaled)
INTERSTATE 75
" ~ I~ w * ~ 19 ~ -0"
> " '0 ~wiS MAP A WilstJnMille!o
~ I " 2 i~ ~i ~9'~
~ !<:I. .
I !:1 i!:1 " ~ GENERAL LOCATION MAP
..... I .. Pllllnor1. E,:"inlHltlo ECII/ogiIIS,' Surveyon
I ~I I >' TOWN OF AVE MARIA
I~ I " LamncapeArchihlcll' TrrlllpomlionCon.uII,ntJ
~ > I~ rn
, 0 0 WllsonMlller, Inc. 0
..... 16 > . ::. I nl""a-=nAr"I.:=n I""'^~. "I~'AI Tn,.,... nl::\/1::1 nnl..Il:..IT NyJo..ForlMyo",.S."'alo.B,.~.r..",..r.nlhtl_.p", Iry h
I II n 3lI!oI>>ilfYUII!._~/~~_' N~H:~orid.:U10U5IJ1
-
----
r 0
,
i ~ ~
e I~
N ~
I~ "
e ~ > ~
0
..... " ~
~ " m
MAP B
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Wils;nMiller
PI",n.rs . Enginetn . Eco/ogiltJ . SuIVl'JIOfJ <:;x:)
Landsc,peArchitect,.TrlIntpOfI,tionCcm.llilants
W1/sonMl/ler, Inc. ,....-.".
NopIo..ForlMym.s.'..",..B'odonroo.T."",..r.II6hJ.....PI1Ia.cII)'...h
32OO&/loyLItM,Sult.2OIl'/MpIfl,f_34f05-8501
DDCDADcn enD. ~n::\A' Tn\A,t...1 nl:\ICI nDl.u::t...IT I I I D
,-..
,..
,..
;7.'
P'
,"<
,,.
,..
,n
,..
P'
P'
i','
.'1.0
J'.'
J'.'
,..
",.
J',J
,('" J" ~"
.1,
!",
In ,I'"
J" ,..
'"
Iii
i'"
j..,
""'J'-'
,,,
"i~.
p.,
J&'
\:""
;.. \.
A:,
;!":)"';\,~:".. ,.. ,.. P'
.~. <'-'. ..~
;,,',1,,' JO' ;"'!
.'~. ....,
W ~,.
j" ~
H'
J.t',',,, ;,_< ,/<l.t
A9, J"
':-r~
',''1' ",
J.....f
:~ '" ,n
~f' ."~ .!'
&C' ,"
;~~;'
- -,_.-~
P' " ",,--
J,j ~'
,1-'
p..
P'
>'.'
".
,..
JU
JL'
1'3
;..,'" ',;.... "...
}'.' J'"
)'.t
'"
p-'
,n
)U
'"
'"
p.'
.)1.'
,"
JO.'
J"
:','
p..
J".'
,n
,..
,I;~.~
(,e
J',I.
J'.'
,..
,..
J~\ p..
...."J.
,..
}'.'
J'-'
p..
)'.'
,..
'"
p..
,,-.
p.'
!>..
'"
lr"
J"
i",'
--"J";;;'"
!'.'
',)"';:
" 1'.'
0'
"~::~,__I!;
)'.'1
,
p.'
,,~.)"
-
.......
IMMOKAL[[ ROAD '00' RIGH1-Oc--WAY
25
;:.:,&.,~ i',,:' p -):i'f,"J,~';>, 'i""",: ;>.0 It,
~, ~-== J" ,;'~ J' I ," )~. ,,, J" ~ 1"~ ,
J" in>') ""Jj'~~"\J.i.fr?,!>~,.>of ""'.....-, J'" I ~'" ~~-,,"k, ~u '. A "'-.' "'~ 1.12-' j, p.o p..:--
.....-=-.....--:.~~'I~-1 1'>' 1 t~-~': '::j.., ~.I" . /-"""'-..--", J" P" I I" I ~__LJ'~.:..... - -- '>Alii 1-1
~_~~~_=_-=-.;~ ..,., " ,I~\~~~,/' '~l' ;/'.io-. ,\ '/-'~'''_ 11,,1 ., I;'Jl ~ .I"',
~---:::.-;o --.::__ - :;:::~. I """- I I' r ')v P' I'" P' ;'O-'iQ- ~ \..,.. '>i).f-';~' I ~__ : .."'" ~__ '--~,I ,'.0 . !I.
::#' I -I V I ,~., I)" ""'".. I~ "". ,,,n.. -- I L' p.' I ~,.'I---- --.-----1'"
~-~~.--ii--~I,;..~~. ,10' I)' P"') ;!i,. '," ~ )" ;ni'" 1"'<0./ 1.1
)" I' I . ,~. )ll-'\j ," /,j'~~, ~i j -----~.. 1'.' I! ,... P-'
_ _ ~,-~:~ ~~I':" .,/.~. .--._~-~;"'\ ,'-' )" ),..''-'~., -" 1'-' )'-;'{'/"},-,~'"i'-'.I" I"~ ,u l ,/1-0,,[ -,:;;'"
~'] -.I~' :;;;:-"""1' .mJ "'1 ,..! III: :l~k ,'.' 4:~ ] t"A il:}-"- ,'A
__-=-'~ V, "M;J;f'--; ~-~i.l' ~" ;'.A ,'" ", JOljl ;~;l.~""'.-('.)d\'),-~.2LL- ! ~i
:~~=-- t"~ :::~@@.~:..~ ",I:,/U, )" ,.I'--' ti ;" ;,~ i'^" "'. )'-' }<.' J'>' r~" !'.' ,OJ J1 J..~C-01.~\I/'i~,~~~~.)-'~~,-- -_.=~-=';...
ji~~~~~~ ': ""~ 1'>'~ -1" ), i )10.. J...'\?;~'J~".--~. ..., .1,-----,:.-~:,---."... 'I
~--::::.-:.~ii2=~, II JO.. I "It ,.. "., , ;, i" fi.~vo."'-' ,#i..rr.----~~ ----.--!I,
- - -'::::-r-.t!~,- It:.~ .iT j'lf "11' ," I ,.., I ~I ,- ,i"'~' '", .. ,.. ", ,.. ":.. ~ !;:?,~,,;~_,~!,~L " i! 1
~ , I!'~ ,',..-.~:...~Il".I,,' i'~ ..y I"',"'r/ -, il~"", "'.J) -IP /'..''-' " , J"~~_~:....d..; -=--~-=---Il --
I ~ 'I II '''''''~ ". ,0 "1 ' ,~=,----
!"l,.','" .,i,.' .';;ii"'~".,," ".i i/"-','" ,..29 c 'u '" '"'''' '.~. 'u w,,...;;:;;;\_ I"'''-=='~
7" ,:. ,::.,,~:.:.. :.~ ~! 5:.;..'" ,::' ,.. '::, ,.. ::: ,.. ,,:.. '::'::: '::, ,,... ,.. ::: (:H~;;:t~2~:~;\'~III~;;~;;T~I':~,~i?~::ti-i,1
ii' J'.' -I" ," ~. ~_~..~[I' 1 'tll : 1 ~ ~1~11~~,t~ jj.,~';: ~"}
&~...
___::_3:\,J
....'
i
.12-' n
-~.I
,..
'0
ro
o
<
c
~
'"
<
W
"
1.1_
>
<
U
"'.0 ,"
,.,
,..
~...
11-'
\\\
,..
\\\~" \ '"
,.
~...
,"
,..
i~.'
)'.'011.' J'.'
,..
i'.'
,'-'
,'"
,.
;1'-'
I" ,'"
,,~\
"
i"
".
"0
,!'.5
)'-' J'"
'"
,..
'"
I'.'
J"
'"
"
,
-I'.'
1'.5
,0'
1'.'
J'.'
'''36 ,-.
po
;'I~
,".'
"
p'
p..
.".'
,..
p.'
i'l.>
,..
F'
;"'I.'~ ;
p.' ! i ", ~..,'
,..T~47:-~.
T - 48(;' S;'
,'.' \i"
,
;~.1
}'-.
,..
J'.'
~,.,
1-i~,.: Pf ,,'t,r;:;:-
~.. -;I'h>~I.' "
".,/ J'-' P:'.~: ".,
"p.., i"~ ~,,.Jfi/1.
. "r"
~, ,.. :j'
," "
,p.' (P ,_' p.,
". /.I,l")'
.1'-' '~...:{ ,.. 1"" ~H
p.' ;n.I.I'-' 1
_':".".0 . ~
?C-" '",.~"';,
~~,.'}'-' ~,~ ,.~~~-'~ ;.. ...
i"~""'~€ -...,....,;" ('" .I" '
A!_ }'~\ '1.~,.,,~, "
"_=~.~_~.!~~ ?' ,,~.. .I~'V\
,. ,
)'.'
~...
,..
,"
'"
!~.;.-
r'~i;lli~'i'~:u p.4
,,,.'" Irlllil!",," ,u " po
'" ,.. ,.'" 't.~':! ,',:;1. ,.. 'i~'U ""<!I,I '~II\':1111
,.. ,.. ' ,.r, , ~ ".~~.'''''' '''', ""',:,111'111'11
\;;,~__~~.,._...,-~"\",,. / ;1;'''' ;1,' .)j'., IIII~ 1111'"
~~~ ;:r-' r;.?J!. ji ,1.' ~;~ ,t.' ,... ,,"'
;,., J '1" I" )'.' I' i". I" :i,c......
'" . . )'-.~,'\, ,~, ,'.' ",.' .I"-'-
_'!:;~__"lrr----'-i,I,. JU '\. ;" 1 ,,'.,n.. ~.
-;"."" .
,
,..~
p.'
"
,~j'
p
,"
;.t.,
'00
~, 0"
,..
,..
;",
,'-,
)d"'"
i'.'
,.
,..
./'.'
;.'-'
"
1
,..
~ ,'.'
,u
,1'.'
,..
,'.'
'"
i
~:
;"
;'.0
;"
J'"
" .".'
J'.'
r'
J'.'
,..
",
>
~
~
"
~
o
,
~
I
o
is'
p..
,..
~,
,
, I
,..
oiL> .n
~'.'
,..
;..,
,..
'"
,,,
./'.,
,., ;." "~
-.-........
1,.,. ....
'I''\.l!.." i'~
'tr"-'
'"
,..
,..
,..
p.'
p,
~..,
,..
;"
,..
,'"
.}.-.
;.-.--
,u
~...
-~".,
,..
'"
,..
iU
,..
'"
p.'
,u
,..
'00
,.~ ' ,.'
r' ",.. '~":">'
~.
,..
,'"
i'.'
p."
,..
i~JI.,
J~~
iu
:;"
~
./'"
,J'.'
~
,CI~..,,...~'"
I'..!
....'.:' J".'
'00
,..
,..
.IU
,..
/0,
~
;..i
"..
P'
iM ! J"
i" Iii
,
,'"
,'.'i'~ , ;u
,,'
,.
,.
.;'~,~~:-
,.
;..,
"
- JU ~.}O->.---:__ ," .~..----
"~-Ir" I" ..... I" J'
,In' ~~ ,/1>.0 jO-,'; ~...
'"
;..,
"., ~...
.,".,,-,-.,
,'"
~"
i--;;o--1'-"--- . -~~)
;\,;t.,
,...1.:.
p.,
;u
}O"
...,
,>.,
i'~ ~'"
,00
"
::: ;,f!
),.---~J>!l
I,: p~
'~j'
p..
,00
~.
'.
""Ii
,..
~,
-..p,.~
OO'i..
.k:
"
-J'-'
,.
p..
,..
00'
".,
,.
"
,..
,..
'"
;0.' - -J~'
i'.'
"i...
on
i'.'
'"
,u
P'
,..
,..
-J'" iU
;...
.p.,
)u .'.' p.'
'"
,,,
,'.'
".
J'.>
i'"
/~_..J I'.'
i'.1
,
"
,
,
'li"
,.
J'.'
;...
,..
,..
F'
,
"
i',""
.d'
,,'" ./'.,
,,, i'.'
i'-'
~I..C,;'..,'.')":~.~:":,
i'.t
,.., iU <OM
'"
!A-'" ...;...
'"
,-
,..
,..
)~,-
,
-"_' P.'!
,..
,I'.,
';'.'
,..
~..t
".'
p.'
'"
~...
p..
::1
,t.'
i'"
,..
.'"
;'.'
"S.
,..
,"~
,..
."~ ,
".
';'.'
,..
p..
"U .I""
,..
;"'-
'"
"
;u '" ,i'" .. ;,.,
'i"',
"
Ii;
!'i
"
..,1'1'
"jl,'
." ,I
';'.' i~!
I" I.,_~J,
...;.~ l<~.~'
,.,~
,::' ,..(1
'"
,.
, .'
;u i.,..,;....~
i...~...\ ,;~
,I.'
i",'
-I'.'
J"-',I'-'
~-"'"
-:,I;!II~' ""'I~'l:'~:I'ilil!l(:':"crl~'lr
"",'il:"I"','III."I"'::I","
, 'll'~"I"I'''iii:I''JII'11
!I I',' .!~ [. f' ': '" . "'1
'I ii: [ : !U'.ii' : .~.;:~!
;;J~""'''I ;4:~I;~~"llpii",i"i'){:;;li"
'])"'-"",1"'1"11\.,,11]1'
'. ""1'[,',..1 ,H
, '" ." ,,, '" "j'ili' ,:":1
,.,.~~"~v"': TJ'F!ij}", _ .1,;I~:4V, {~',I'\i
1l1f.>r7011''!IT~r II ~II I' I~"" 1Tti'1=11' \(I"I'IIm-r
"UIII":I':'I" ," I" ;lil,:",'1 .1], I 'I ',j IAI,,! 'I\,\,I![:,
' 111II1 i")" 1'1 ;1' .II> 1!I,r '\Jll\'!'lrll
',I ",., I," . ,.. ,.. ,.. " ,.. ,.: ,}:'lj;)..\~~;.:;!,!:,t,.; ;,'\
".0/'" '
I ".i_
,
i'.'
p.'
I,".'
J'.'
~:~ )1.'
,..
'1"'''i''
'"
i..t
)'.'
,.
;0'';
)U ':1
,..
iU
,J
;..,
,
,..
iU if:
." !' It.> -Jo~
J'" Jt}~'
,.:IJ" J"
!~"
i'-' ill ".. ;11
i" ,,, ~./'" ~.:~ }.....
~ -~~I.....r~l.., }UrJ16;0-, P-'
pf-""----;.-;- -11~~'" ,., ;.., in
~... "~ I,,,,,.,-.-;.~ I
}" .".' ;-;~'r.i" ,/.,~., i'.' J'_'
I'"
I.' iU ""',;.. ~~~~. JU ;,./~'
J"'~'" i,I,',1 ;~'-" }'.' -''' i'~
;u ,'" J" ;ao J..t'
.'...~..jl -II.< i'"
1 J .' Jl.f J"~'" i'.'
1M }'A ' '-'p~\( ,... ~u ,!~,
J" Jot J~' ..,
,..
;"
,..
)'" i~'
;"','~'
)'!" ,..,JU
(," .1M
,,.,, ____'7'i~...,..,.{,~':-A ';'"
,"';','
,..
'"
J'.'
~...
;,-,
,..
---';',:;;..
p..
,..
.."
,..
.'"
}'o.'
1'i'"
,..,
,..
.I'"
....,,'"
;~.;,:..
NOT A SURVEY
".'
)j\.'J.' ,"-'
,'.'
,u
},.'
,"
)M 0,".
F'
,'.'
i','
,..
i'"
,".' ,,~.
_-l~
,..
,I'.'
,..
,..
,..
,..
,..
}U
,'.'
;0.1 ,"'.
,..
J"
p.. ;,.,
,..
,I--'
"
;...
,..
J',' ,'"
)")'.'
i'"
0"
P'
)'.'
,"
,..
i....". I"
,..
.I'"
, ,';~'"..
,
,
jJ", _ )'~
~t::~~9!:;
. J'.'
~., i"
,"
I'-'i"
i','
~,..
I J"
p' ::18
:i
,..
,"
~:.'
,..
1.3,..
~..,
,'"
;...
,..
i~' ~~' I....
p.\
i'"
~.. '
i':O-, "I.'
)';i! JU ;,.. r.' J'-'
."~ ,I~.~" )'" - j;; 'i',""
,.. "::!"~ti,."~:"!!,;,:, ,.. ." ," '",..'''
p"
I"~ ~,.. .' p.';.... i'.' ;..1'" ,/,.. i'" ,,..;"
p..
i"p..
,'-'
'"
,..
J..t
)'.' ,/,~ ;..,~..
i'-'
I'.'
,..
i'-'
jo.~:.
~~.I
J'-'
,..
~~,.,
~...
".
,.
J'.'
;,.'J"
i~'~;;-~.'~-I;/"
}I.'
,..
;...
.".'
i.~
,.-----
011 WEU RQAD '00' RIGHT-Or-WAY
:::;l::NU,Ac. t.on::;.
1 roAReD CONTAINS 4995,0 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
2 F'ARC:::L LIES WITHIN ZONE .D" PEl, "LOaD ;NSURA~Ct: RATE MAr
PANE.L NLMBr.~ . :i:U06/ 275D. TillS PANn. liAS .'NOT BEEN PRINTED
ARI.'.A 11\ lONE I)", PER MAP INDr~X DA1E::C JULY 20, 19ge
5. TOPOGRAPHICNFORMATION SHOWN I-<EREO'-l Ar<[ [lASeD ON ~_IJ-;:ll
:WElDA WATFR MANACft.AfNI IllsrRln (SIWMI')-..J;L\Mf ,{EJAS__Slf<AtlO
I\REA AER~J. 'iIIRVH '-'fmIFCT TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS i!).I\Tm_~OOO),
1.000
2.000
4.000' ~
,V
NORTH
o
GRAPHIC SCALE
14 '-;,~4
cn.~: R".le; V>-l~.IX'.\Sl!k\" \ iljb\'-ri-iI5i'..d'''.;
"
o
~ I~ I~ * :g !'~ ~
.,- I.m [~~ 1
,
w
I~ i
.m.
~ I~ I
,
12' I~
n .
.....
-co
~W~
a;~,:
~
..
>,
.
MAP C
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsOnMiller.
..
Pl.Bnnefli.EnginefIfJ.fCOIogi5t&.SurveyorJ~
Landsl:apeArchiraCII' rral15PCt1'lionConll1ill~ "-A,J
WlIsonMlller,lnc,
lIopIo..FQrlMy.,..s.n..rb.f1,.df"ran.T."",..T_.....P."~
Jm&l..:"'!.:=~~s.~~~^._N:':!...~:!.o;t::;:::u507 .. '"
"
~
DD~D^D~n I:nD. ~I~\AI Tn'A/~1 nc\/cl nDUCPdT I I I D
.-
-
-....
.j:>.
~
~~
~
MAP 0
EXISTING LAND USE MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsilnMiller.
..
PllMl1efl. Engine/n. E~I.", S~fVtJOl5
LI/lld5l:,peArchIlKIJ.TrlnIPll1WIionConwlt.t1ltl
WllsonMiller, Inc.
Nopjo.. For/Myon. SMoot.. B..dtllkm.r.""...TIIIWHH.P.n.....
J2QOs.JlfyL~..Su#o200 '1PpIn,FkJfid.:UIOU!m
...... ,,"-.....-..... ~.. ,.........<,,~
~
I, I.
o ,
" 0
::.:1:::
DI:U:nADlI:'n 1:1"\13. t..II::\AI TnlAn,J nc\/cl nDUI:r.JT I II D
"
~
......
I
~
-
-...
U'I
"
- I
~ ~
..
.,
w
MAP E
SOILS MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsflnMille
..
PlBllnm.Engill~.Ecologim.SurveYDn
L,nd5C1pt1Architec,..Tm1llpolfltiooCon.uIIlJlII
Wl/sonMlller,lnc.
NopJo. . FDrtMym . SIt,.."", . Bradonkm. r."",.. T~_. P."lIU
J2Oll~yL~~,_~:-~_. ~~."!.",!,!~!~5-8507
~
"
~
......
"
o
P~i=P4~i=n I=n~. I\li=W TnWI\l ni=\fl'l nDMl'l\lT I I I D
0">
~ I~ I
...... m.
-
~
I" I' In 0 I" 1_0.
,., " "",~ '" ""w'"
ol,~ II! ~,~
.J ,'I .J ~
" "...
."
I.~
WilsqnMille '
P1Jnnet5.Er1fIinHrI.E~~"'SUIV8)'Ol"l~
Land'C8Pf1Archillldl . TIIIlI/lQI",ionCMlIlIUntI ""-A.I
WilsonMiller, Inc.
NopIf..FMMywo.s.."'olor.l1radon/on.T~.ro/hluJ_.p."~
JlIJfJ&!loyLIII..SuIIo1lJl1o//'fJI..,RorlrIo,uI05-8$D7 '- -."
"""_ "o.""lUII~n. F.. '_1l1.Al'l.ITf~
w
MAP F-1
FLUCCSNEGETATION MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
_ 0
,
I~ 1<:
"
~
DDC'DADl:'n I:nD. ..I CUI TnWPd nl:'\/I:'I nDMI:'h.lT I I I P
>-
-
'-
--J ~
~
~ ~
..... 1 I I ~
I ,~ i~ i , , ~
MAP F-2
SFWMD WETLANDS MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
P~J:P4~J:n J:n~. IIIJ:W TnWIII nJ:vJ:1 npUJ:IIIT I I I P
~
:t
WilsIJnMiller
..
PllflnI!l'I' Enginem. Eco/0gi5ls. SUrwy0/5
umm'~Archileeu. TtanlpOltBlronCOIt.ultants
WilsonMiller, Inc.
1Up/f..FonMyMO.S,o'...,III.Iln<IMIon.TMljNI.T."-II......"-"-
J2OO~~L~~s.."!t!~: ~::..~!!!~'
-.
~
Species Legend
Common Name
lj American Alligator
. Caracara
IiJ Kestrel
EiJ Limpkin
~ Little Blue Heron
~ Roseate Spoonbill
~ Sandhill Crane
C\) Snowy Egret
(>J Tri-colored Heron
"" White Ibis
(l,) Wood Stork
e Burrowing Owl
& Burrows
Legend
DDRI
Vehicle Transects
Pedestrian Transects
(Xl
- !
~ ~
..
MAP G
TRANSECTS/LISTED SPECIES MAP
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsOnMiller
..
PWII1f1{J.EllflilIfWt.~.Surveyo,.
Lan.:t.capeArc/litectl.r"'lIIp(JrtJltionCCIfllultanl'
WilsonM/IIor,lnc.
NIp"" fMMyon. s.....ar.. EkoHnW"' T.mp.' T.IiIhuoH.I'..,.",.
mQ~ioy~!._~~~_. /I~:_"!.",!,!!~!~5D7
,
_ 0
..,: ~
19 ]<::
>
o
"
::: !
"
~
.....
~
DCE:'CACl:'n ene. t-.lCW TnWM ne\Je. nDUCMT I I I D
m
.
dl;'I*1
> I
co
~
FSA
_.
-.
~
I.
I
"
---I
WRA
o
HSA
WRA
o
HSA
HSA
HSA
I
"
"
"
"
"
"
I
()
~
;s:
"U
^
m
~
(j)
;0
FSA 0
~
0
o
R
HSA
----------~L--------------i
,
,
,
,
\
I
I
-----------_!_----------
o
Oil
WE l l
ROAD
DRI lAND USE SUMMARY
[AMU I UNIVERSITY / SCHOOLS 995 AC
R RESIDENTIAL 2,921 AC
I'WI
'7,~,{1 MIXED USE 328 AC
1~lllil COMMUNITY FACILITY 211 AC
- WETLAND PRESERVE 62 AC
PARK 61 AC
I <::c:> I LAKE PARKS 175 AC
-- ROADWAYS 242 AC
- DRI BOUNDARY 4,995 AC
OFF-SITE RlSA DESIGNATIONS
I FSAJ RLSA FLOWWAY STEWARDSHIP AREA
WRA---I RLSA WATER RETENTION AREA
1 HSA I RLSA HABITAT STEWARDSHIP AREA
o I RLSA OPEN
4,000' .~
I..
NORTH
NUL> LAN()lJSf CO ASSlrlCATIONS ANn A(;RI'A"rS SHUWN M'OVl M^YIN'-''-UUL INllKNAL
';1'" '- IS, LAK,,~ "I",N SPAC" ANCI OTHFR ",~pnRTINC LJSI:s
o 1,000 2,000
I
GRAPH IC SCALE
o I~ ~
~ I~ ,.
< I' 1
; ~ .';f
, ~",,,,
-...."'[!;
o;~::
~
u
MAP H
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Wilsl)nMillBlt
P!an11fH'J.fn9ineers.fcDlogim.sutveyo~
LandllcapeArchitflc's'Trangpo"'tilmConsulta~
WilsonMiller,lnc.
NapI...F""Myoro.S.,.,oro.B,._".T...""...T.n""....:~BHCh
32(/O~~~'::=~S:!~~n. /J~"~!!.'?I!~.I!5"8~ J
m
.....
- ~ > '0 "
" 0 i~
" ~
I~ 0 I o.
PRI=P4RI=n I=nR. NI=W TnWN nl=Vl=1 nPMI=...T I I I D
-
"
,
m ,
" z
< .
..... ~
0 H
>'
m
~ "
..... ~
N
m
MAP 1-1
EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
Wi/sOnMi//e
..
PllfIMTlo Enginftrf. Ecol0gi5ts. Surwyors
LandSt;apeArchl/ects.TTlfI5IlOlllliotlCMllIItlrnts~
WilsonMiller, Inc. "-A.I
1I1p/f..FonMy.,..s..,n"",.IlIw/"'Iotl.T."",.oT.s.Il._.P.,.",..CIlj'S..ch
mo~~;~a.~...z:.,.~,:::::::'::::U5()l r-'\
PREPARED FOR: NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT. LLLP
~
~ " i
. z
. .
..... 0 ~
..... I I
~ I, m
" w "
i~ Q
..... 10
'^
-
~
MAP 1-2
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
WilsOnMilj
..
PlmollJ'l' Enginffrf. Eco/oglltt. Surwyors
LM!dIC~peA1WitKl. . TllIn.pOJTIlicMCfl111U1/B11fJ
Q)
DDI:DADl:n I:nD. IdI:W TnWId nl:Vl:1 nDMl:ldT I I I P
WilsonMlller, Inc.
,..,...roITMyon.s.fH$.Bro_.r."",..roihh.o.....p""M.
32D~_y1Ml..SUJlflfXl.Nop/H,FlQI'/d.J41DU5IJ1
,,"...11ll-&lJl..uJ4D. fu 2N-&U.51l.
--
,-
-~
<
CORKSCREW RD
~__J
~
;-
-..j
CJ\
Oil WEll RD
ACH RD
IMMOKALEE RD
RANDALL BLVD
VANDER Il T BEACH
:E
r-
CJl
o
Z
llJ
<
GOLDEN GATE BLVD C
m
<
m
;0
G>
>
C
m
CJl
llJ
<
C
CJl
;0
N
co
>
;0
"'C
o
~ PIN lOGE RD
"'C
C
r-
C
z
G>
;0
C GOLDEN GATE
()
:;0
co
CJ1
~
RADIO RD
1-75
DAVIS BLVD
Legend
- ROADS
~ DRI BOUNDARY
CJl
:;0
co
CJ1
~
~ I" .1" ~ 0 I>
ffi ~:,z~*~
i i
.....lr.' ,~
I\.)
o _
~ '
o _
~ CD
o
@
NORTH
WilsonMille
..
Plannerr. fllflinttlrlo Ecologim, SutveYM
LBndacapeArcMecls . Tlilnlpol1,tioIICanlull,n/S
WilsonMiller,lnc.
N"""..fotlMyOlli.s,,""<>/lt.e"dfnlOll.T""P".T._.....P........
321J/J~~~~~:~ s:;~~". N:'!!.'~;Io;!'!:!!!~-85lJ7
.....
Z t I
:-< ~ I
,
~ I~ I
m
o
o
~ I
~ ,
u
.'
m
MAP J
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
TOWN OF AVE MARIA
o
"
I "'~
I to..
PRFPARFn FnR' tdFW TnWtd nFVFI nPMFtdT I I I P
rac
..
QUESTION 10 - GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Part I Specific Project Description
A. Describe and discuss in general terms all major elements of the proposed
development in its completed form. Include in this discussion the proposed phases
(or stages) of development (not to exceed five years), magnitude in the appropriate
units from Chapter 28-24, F.A.C., where applicable, and expected beginning and
completion dates for construction.
The Town of Ave Maria (hereinafter referred to as the Town or as Ave Maria) has been
planned under an innovative rural planning strategy created for 195,000 acres of land
located in eastern Collier County called the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship
Area or RLSA, The Town will encompass 4,995 acres and is planned in accordance with
the goals, objectives, and policies contained in Collier County's Growth Management Plan,
and the development standards contained in the Land Development Code for the RLSA.
These planning policies and land development regulations have been nearly five years in
the making, resulting from a comprehensive and collaborative planning process.
The RLSA encourages the retention of agriculture, protection of natural resources and
diversification of the rural economy by application of an incentive-based credit system,
The RLSA promotes the planning and development of new communities in the rural area
to accommodate population growth in a more compact, self-sufficient and sustainable
manner than was previously allowed, Under the RLSA Overlay, Stewardship Credits are
generated from the designation of Stewardship Sending Areas (SSA's), which are areas
designated for protection of natural resources and agriculture, and utilization of those
credits to entitle development in Stewardship Receiving Areas (SRA's), where new
communities are permitted and natural resource values are low, The Town of Ave Maria
is the first Stewardship Receiving Area to be designated under the RLSA program,
The initiative for the creation of the Town came from a unique and exciting opportunity to
site a new private university campus in Collier County, Ave Maria University (AMU), Long
time property owners, the Barron Collier Company, donated the campus site and they
have formed a partnership with AMU named New Town Development, LLLP, to jointly
develop the new town, The University is expected to become a center of educational,
intellectual and spiritual activities within the Town and for the Southwest Florida Region.
The Town will be a mixed-use community, planned using the principals of walkability and
self-sufficiency. The Town Master Plan (Map H) depicts the general location and
configuration of major community land uses and features, The Town will consist of
residential neighborhoods ("R") connected by a network of low speed streets and
sidewalks, a mixed-use town center ("M"), where residents and students will be provided
essential goods and services, civic gathering places, entertainment, dining, employment,
and housing, The Community Facility District (CF) accommodates civic, institutional,
governmental, and essential services necessary to support Town residents, The
Wetland Preserves (W), Parks (P), and Lakes (L) establish the open space and
recreational framework of the Town, Design guidelines and an integrated plan for
landscaping, signage, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and community services will
712312004- 135516 Ver: 011. MPERRY
~,
03186-013-QOO.PORI-28423
10-1
rac
~
~
.~
tie the neighborhoods together, creating a viable town structure, while providing for
individual neighborhood identity, The AMU Campus will accommodate a full range of
educational, administrative, housing, recreational and support facilities to support
university activities,
The Town will include the following land uses identified in Chapter 28-24, FAC.:
11,000 residential dwelling units
690,000 square feet of retail/service
510,000 square feet of office
400 hotel rooms
a 6,000-student university
In addition to the DRI threshold uses described above, the Town may include up to 450
units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and
miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, public and private
schools, uses such as golf courses, lakes, open space, and community support facilities,
and those uses customarily associated with a university such as student and
administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support facilities,
In addition to the DRI review, Collier County policies will require the Town to obtain a
Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) designation from the Board of County
Commissioners, This designation has already been obtained for the 960 acre PDA area
in the center of the Town, and the applicant anticipates amending this SRA to include
the balance of the Town concurrently with the DRI review process, The SRA will provide
further definition to the Town's plan by creating specific districts and design standards
to establish neighborhoods of varying character. To provide a full range of housing
opportunities for future residents, it is envisioned that neighborhood areas within the
town will be targeted to different segments of the housing market and lifestyles,
including primary housing, vacation homes, entry level homes, retirement homes,
apartments, and age targeted neighborhoods,
The entire site of the Town of Ave Maria falls within an open or undesignated
classification of the RLSA, which means that it has minimal natural resource value and
is best suited to accommodating new development. Under the RLSA natural resource
scoring system, no part of the Town reaches the index threshold of significant natural
resource value, However, the Town of Ave Maria will indirectly have a significant positive
impact on natural resource protection. As provided by the Collier County RLSA policies,
natural resources will be protected and agriculture activities will be retained through the
establishment of Stewardship Sending Areas (SSA's) that will generate the Stewardship
Credits needed to entitle the Town, Including the acreage of the SSA's utilized to entitle
the PDA, an estimated 20,000 acres of SSA's will be protected to entitle the Town, All
SSA's are subject to a Stewardship Easement, which preserves the natural resources and
protects agricultural activities within these areas by removing the potential for incompatible
future development.
The Florida Department of Community Affairs and New Town Development LLLP have
entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) and Collier County has
approved the first phase of the Town by designating the PDA area as a Stewardship
Receiving Area (SRA), Pending approval of the South Florida Water Management
District Environmental Resource Permit and other local development approvals, the PDA
7/2312004- 135516 Ver: 011. MPERRY
=.'
0371l6-013-000-PDRI.2M23
10-2
"-8C
will allow the start of construction for the University and Town on 960 acres, while DRI
review is underway for the balance of the Town, The PDA phase will focus on creating
essential campus facilities, and on providing the homes, commercial services and civic
assets required by families associated with the University, and is organized in five
districts - the Town Core, Town Center, Neighborhood General, University and
Community Services; each will support a mix of uses and will promote a diverse and
successful community,
..
I
The DRI has two phases, Phase I will conclude in 2011 and Phase /I will conclude in
2016, These dates are best estimates and will be governed by market and economic
conditions beyond the control of the applicant.
B. Provide a breakdown of the existing and proposed land uses on the site for each
phase of development through completion of the project. The developed land uses
should be those identified in Section 380.0651, F.S. and Chapter 28-24, FAC. Use
Level III of The Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System: A Technical
Report (September 1985), available from each regional planning council. Refer to
Maps D (Existing Land Use) and H (Master Plan). Use the format below and treat
each land use category as mutually exclusive unless otherwise agreed to at the
preapplication conference.
7/2312004.135516 Ve, 01'- MPERRY
-
03786-01J.-OOO-PDRI_28423
10-3
""ac
41
.
'l
Table 10.1.B-1: Existing Land Use Descriptions
FLUCCS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
211 ImDraved Pastures 583,1 11.7
212E1 UnimDroved Pastures, 10-24% exotic cover 5.2 0,1
214 Row CroDs 3356,8 67.2
242 Sod Farms 327.4 6,6
260 Other ODen Lands - Rural 28.4 0,6
261 Fallow Crao Land 133,0 2,7
3100 Herbaceous (Dry Prairiel, disturbed 5,3 0,1
321 Palmetto Prairies 42,8 0,9
329 Other Shrubs and Brush 18.7 0.4
330 Mixed Ranoeland 39,5 0,8
411 Pine Flatwoods, saw Dalmetto understory 15,2 0,3
411E3 Pine Flatwoods, saw oalmetto understory, 50-75% exotic cover 0,5 0,0
411E4 Pine Flatwoods, saw nalmetto understory, >75% exotic cover 0,6 0,0
4160 Pine Flatwoods, oraminoid understory, disturbed 9,0 0,2
416E3 Pine Flatwoods, oraminoid understory 50-75% exotic cover 35,1 0,7
422 Brazilian PeDDer luolandl 36,7 0,7
434 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed 4,0 0,1
434E3 2,2 0,0
512 Aaricultural canals 25.4 0,5
617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 1,3 0.0
618 Willow 16.2 0,3
618E2 Willow, 25-49% exotic cover 1.1 0,0
618E3 Willow, 50-75% exotic cover 8,0 0,2
619 Brazilian PeDDer (wetland) 91.2 1.8
621 CVDress 8,0 0,2
621E2 Cvnress, 25-49% exotic cover 0,2 0,0
621E3 Cvoress, 50-75% exotic cover 8,0 0,2
624E1 Cvnress-Pine-Cabbaae Palm, 10-25% exotic cover 1.4 0,0
625 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods 6,8 0,1
625E3 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, 50-75% exotic cover 1,8 0,0
625E4 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, >75% exotic cover 1,7 0,0
630E4 Wetland Forested Mixed, >75% exotic cover 9,9 0,2
631 Wetland Shrubs and Brush 12,5 0,3
6310 Wetland Shrubs and Brush, disturbed 22,0 0.4
641 Freshwater Marsh 27,9 0,6
6419 Freshwater Marsh, Primrose Willow Predominant 1.8 0,0
6410 Freshwater Marsh disturbed 1.5 0,0
641E2 Freshwater Marsh, 25-49% exotic cover 1,1 0,0
641E3 Freshwater Marsh, 50-75% exotic cover 0,5 0,0
641E4 Freshwater Marsh, >75% exotic cover 3,1 0,1
643 Wet Prairie 30.2 0,6
6430 Wet Prairie, disturbed 35,8 0,7
740 Disturbed Lands I Barren 0,7 0,0
8145 Roads and Hiohwavs, Graded and Drained 33,5 0,7
Total 4995,0 100,0
712312004.135516 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~,
03785-01J...OOO-PORI_26423
10-4
Be
4
Table 10.1.B-2
Proposed Land Uses
FLUCCS Code Land Use Approximate Percent of
Acres Total
120, 126 Residential, Medium Density, With or Without 2,921 58,5
Golf Course
1711 University/Schools 995 19.9
100 Mixed Use 328 6.5
814 Roadways 242 4,8
170,830 Institutional (non-university) 211 4,2
524 Lakes 175 3,5
600 Wetland Preserve 62 1,3
180 Recreational (e,a" Parks) 61 1,3
Total 4,995 100.0
C. Briefly describe previous and existing activities on site. Identify any constraints or
special planning considerations that these previous activities have with respect to
the proposed development.
The site has been historically used for agricultural purposes, including land that is used
for purposes accessory to agriculture (e,g" access roads, perimeter berms, ditches,
staging areas, etc,), Existing agricultural activities are row cropping, sod farming, and
pastures. The Town site includes scattered lands with exotic vegetation, non-forested
wetlands, non-forested uplands, and forested wetlands, all of which exhibit a high
degree of disturbance, The RLSA Natural Resource Index establishes an index value of
1,2 or less as indicating no significant natural resource value, Following an intensive
verification analysis that included detailed FLUCCS mapping and listed species surveys,
it was determined that all 4,995 acres of land within the Town possess a Natural
Resource Index value of less than 1,2, This analysis affirms the intent of the RLSA
program to direct development to lands with relatively low environmental value, and is
consistent with the predominance of agricultural land uses, non-hydric soils, and the
lack of native habitats for listed species,
D. If the development is proposed to contain a shopping center, describe the primary
and secondary trade areas which the proposed shopping center will serve.
The Town of Ave Maria will include 690,000 square feet of retail space and 510,000
square feet of office space, This space will be distributed throughout the Town, but is
focused primarily within the Mixed Use designated areas, While not constituting a
shopping center in the traditional sense, the retail and office space will serve the same
purpose of providing neighborhood and community scaled goods and services, The
Town CenterlTown Core Area is designed as a pedestrian oriented mixed-use area with
a wide variety of retail, office, dining, civic and community uses, Other Mixed Use sites
to the east of the Town Center will offer sites for larger retail/office facilities which may
include shopping centers,
7/2312004-135516 VeL 011. MPERRY
0_'
03766-01J-O(lO.PDRI-28423
10-5
"'8C"
The Town's residents and employees and the University's students, faculty and
administrative staff generate the demand for the retail and office space, To estimate the
required amount of space to provide, analysis was performed using multiple data
sources including Claritas, Inc, for local market area households and household income
data; consumer expenditure profiles from the U,S, Department of Labor Consumer
Expenditure Survey; and Urban Land Institute shopping center tenant profiles, square
footage requirements and average sales per square foot by store type from the
publication Dollars and Cents of Shoppinq Centers,
Collier County's RLSA policies require that a minimum of 65 square feet of building area
for community and neighborhood based goods and services be provided for each
residential dwelling unit within a Town, This equates to a minimum of 715,000 square
feet, and therefore the Town Plan meets and exceeds the minimum requirements of the
Growth Management Plan,
E. Describe, in general terms, how the demand for this project was determined.
In late 2002, Collier County had the privilege of being identified by the AMU founders as
the most desirable place in Florida to locate a new university. Collier County had
recently adopted the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA) making it possible
to select a preferred rural location for the new university, Through the location selection,
planning and design of the university, it was determined that residential and non-
residential uses were necessary to support the University students, faculty and
administrative staff. The Town was planned and designed to support the demands
generated by AMU, as well as the meeting the requirements set forth in the RLSA
policies, including town size, number of residential units, retail and office square
footage, civic and institutional square footage and parks and open space,
The Town of Ave Maria is designed to create a new community, provide support
services and interact with the University such that both the University and the
surrounding new community each benefit from the new town development. The
provision of developable lands surrounding the formation of a new university is
necessary and appropriate to support the university demands for housing and services
and to provide an opportunity for residents of the integrated town to take advantage of
the intellectual and cultural environment created by the university itself,
While undergraduate students are required to live on campus, the university will require
off campus housing accommodating faculty, administrative staff, graduate students and
others affiliated with the university. Supporting retail and office services are also
required as described previously, In addition, the applicant believes that many new
residents will be drawn to the Town to live in close proximity to the intellectual
community created by the university and to take advantage of the educational, religious
and cultural offerings the University will provide, The Town also provides a new option
for residents who prefer to live in a rural location but seek the benefits of living in a small
town environment with the associated services and amenities, Without the RLSA, such
an option is not available in the rural district of Collier County as the only option under
the baseline land use regulations is 5-acre lot development.
1/2312004- 135516 Ver 011_ MPERRY
-
03786-01:l-000.-PORI_28423
10-6
",..
Be
Part 2 Consistency with Comprehensive Plans
A. Demonstrate how the proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive
plan and land development regulations. Indicate whether the proposed project will
require an amendment to the adopted local comprehensive plan, including the
capital improvements element. If so, please describe the necessary changes.
The Town of Ave Maria (The Town) will be developed according to the goals and policies
of the Collier County Growth Management Plan Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
Overlay and the RLSA Overlay District development regulations contained in Collier
County's Land Development Code, Amendment to the local comprehensive plan is not
required,
B. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in
the appropriate Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan.
The Town is consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan of the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council, dated April 2002, The goals and policies of the plan address
the following regional issues: affordable housing, economic development, emergency
preparedness, natural resources, and regional transportation,
Affordable Housinq
The Town will provide a wide range of single-family and multi-family units of varying sizes
and types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories,
Economic Development
The Town furthers Southwest Florida's economic goals of diversification, Ave Maria
University will be a new regional economic driver, and the Town will provide 1,200,000
square feet of retail and office space, generating significant numbers of new jobs in rural
Collier County,
Goal 11-6, Policies 7, 8, 9 and 11 require financial responsibility for infrastructure
necessary to support the project. The Town will pay impact fees to Collier County and its
residents will pay property taxes that will assist economic development in the County, An
independent Special District, known as the Ave Maria Stewardship Community District,
hereinafter referred to as "Special District" will provide a mechanism for the funding,
construction and operation of the Town's infrastructure, The applicant will also provide
right-of-way for the future improvements of Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road, Policy
4,17 of the RLSA requires that the fiscal self-sufficiency of the town be demonstrated
during SRA review,
The Town is consistent with all relevant economic development goals and policies of the
SWFRPC's Strategic Regional Policy Plan,
Emerqencv Preparedness
The Town is located entirely within the Category 4/5 Zone on the Hurricane Storm Tide
Atlas and the applicant is exempt from providing responses to Question 23, The applicant
is coordinating with Collier County Emergency Management Department to explore
712312004- 135516 Vet; 011- MPERRY
,-,
037Be.-013-000-PDRI-28423
10-7
raG
of
.
opportunities to provide emergency supply storage for the County, and hurricane shelter
for coastal residents,
Natural Resources
Goal 11-15, Policy 1, GoaIIV-8, Policy 1 and GoaIIV-2, Policy 2, state that wetland areas
should be protected, conserved and restored to maintain their value, Under Collier
County's RLSA policies, the Town will require the establishment of Stewardship Sending
Areas, of approximately 20,000 acres, These lands will be protected through the SSA
designations, The SSAs fulfill the intent of the RLSA program to entitle development
through the protection of areas with high natural resource values,
GoaIIV-3, Policy 5 and GoaIIV-6, Policy 7 requires adequate potable water and central
sewer systems, A private utility will be constructing and operating a central water and
sewer system to support The Town.
ReQional Transportation
Goal V-3, Policy 2 states that land use plans should provide an appropriate mix of land
uses to reduce unnecessary travel time, The intent of this policy is met by providing a full
range of uses within The Town, in a compact form, allowing for uses to be mixed both
horizontally and vertically,
Goal V-6 relates to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Town has been designed to be
pedestrian oriented, providing low-speed streets with sidewalks and an interconnected
system of trails that traverse through both the town and university, Many residents will be
located within a five to ten minute walk of the town center, and all residents will be within a
three-mile bike ride of the town center,
Goal V-12, Policy 6, explains that developments will be in conformance with area wide
transportation plans and participate in the elimination of expected adverse impacts on the
transportation system. The response to Question 21 demonstrates that the Town will be
consistent with this policy,
C. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in
the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.), including, but not limited to, the
goals addressing the following issues: housing, water resources, natural systems
and recreational lands, land use, public facilities, transportation, and agriculture.
HousinQ
The Town will provide a wide range of single-family and multi-family units of varying sizes,
types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories The Applicant agreed
at the DRI pre-application meeting to work with the County regarding affordable housing in
the area,
Water Resources
New developments are required to be compatible with existing local and regional water
supplies, Consistent with this policy, a private utility will provide water and wastewater
services to The Town, This goal also requires the protection of surface and
groundwater quality and the promotion of water conservation and water reuse
techniques, The quantity of water required for irrigation will be less than what is
112312004.135516 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
~,
03786-013-000-PDRI-26423
10-8
rac
...
currently permitted and being used by existing agriculture, Appropriate best
management practices and techniques will be used in the Town, consistent with the
requirements of the South Florida Water Management District.
Natural svstems and recreational lands
The State Comprehensive Plan encourages the protection and restoration of important
ecological systems, Through the RLSA policies and designation of the Town as an SRA,
a variety of valuable natural resources are protected on approximately 20,000 acres of
land under Stewardship Sending Area Easements,
Land Use
The Town of Ave Maria is the first Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) designation in
Collier County to utilize the sustainable principles set forth in the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area Overlay, The RLSA establishes stewardship principles and practices that address
three public interests - protecting natural resources, ensuring agricultural viability, and
promoting economic diversity while directing growth away from environmentally sensitive
areas. It is located on land where ecological analysis provided within the Natural
Resource Index Assessment indicates development suitability, Through the establishment
of the first Stewardship Sending Area and SRA, the Town promotes the three
cornerstones of the RLSA.
Public Facilities
Adequate fire, police and emergency services will be available to the Town, Required
impact fees and ad valorem taxes will be collected by Collier County to provide funding
for these entities,
Town utility services will be constructed and operated by a private utility company. This
will allow for financial self-sufficiency in providing a fiscally sound and cost-effective
mechanism to provide and maintain water and wastewater facilities,
Transportation
The State Plan requires the coordination of transportation improvements with the State,
Local and Regional plans, The Town will be consistent with the transportation provisions
of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the regional MPO plan,
Aariculture
The Town will provide for economic diversification of the rural Collier County agriculture
industry, SSAs that will generate the Credits for the Town protect and maintain
agriculture activities, both active and passive, on 20,000 acres of land under
Stewardship Sending Area Easements,
7/2312004.135516 Ver: 01,. MPERRY
c_,
037B6-013-QOO.-PDRI-2842J
10-9
,.. .
Be
Part 3 Demographic and Employment Information
A. Complete the following Demographic and Employment Information tables,
Table 10.3.A-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Demographic Information
Persons K-12 Persons
Total Per Total Children Total K-12 65 + Per Total
Phase Dwelling Units Household Population per Children Household Persons
Household 65+
SF MF
1 3980 2030 2,2 13,247 0,22 1,305 0,74 4,453
2 2896 2094 2,2 11,034 0.22 1,182 0,74 4,032
Total 6876 4124 2,2 24,281 0,22 2,487 0,74 8,485
Source: Fishkind & Associates, Inc" US Census Bureau, University of Florida BEBR
712312004- 135516 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
,-,
037Il&-Ol3-()()()..PORI.28423
10-10
~
'"
~
'"
(Q
'"
S'
"
c:
!!!.
~
(Q
'"
s:
o
0-
'"
~
'"
-
'"
'"
"
0-
r--I
'" a
!ll !!!.
mm
3 3
-0-0
o~~
::1'33
fI: '" '"
~aa
-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~m~~m~~~~~m~~m~~~~......WWWWW~NNN~~__*r
_C>>_aJ~w~-!>>~(J)~ww'-'_C1Jp'~W_O_C>>_C11_W~N 0.....,. CJ'i N 0 ""-I Ut W N - 0......, (J'l (,.oJ... 0......, c.n I\) 0......, 0'1 N 0 C>> 0
UlOUlO<.n0C110(J'lcoo C110C1lWC,1l- - - - - - - . - w - -. - - - - - - - - - - - . oI!.
ooooooooo(J)oooooo0C110C11~(J'IOm~WO(J'lOOm0C110C110C110CJ'iON~
oooooooooooooooo8gggogggg~ggggggggggggggg
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
-~~*~~~~~~*~*~~~mU'lC11C11(J'1CJ'i.....WWWWWNNNN____*~
g ~ ~ ~ ~ g g: ~ ~ c; Uf ;j ~ ...,. UI W .N!D w""" w'" JV.o w-"" w"'.w _N :-.<0.-...1 w'" .1\> .- wCC w""" ~.N.(I) w...... w'" .N .CO cg.
'^-....'^.....'^.....'--....'_......^.^-....'^-....~,...CD...<O...aJ...COC11...W<O...<OCO(J)CD...CD...<C.cc...co
- - - - - -- - I~CD<CCDCO<CWCDCO<C(Q(J'I<C<CCOCO...<CCD<OCOCOCOCC<Cco
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<OCOCOCOCD<CCD<O<C<C<CCDCDCO<CCD<O<C<OCOCO<O<CCDCD
:I:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~8i~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~iIl'
<CCOCD<CC>>C1Jc>>c>>.....,.....,......,....,m m(J)(J'IUlC11c.n.. .........WWWWWNNNN____*
CC......,...NCO.....,...N<e"""._cc N-CD(J)w-<cm W-OC/Jm...NOC>>(J)w_c>>mw_cc=
~~N~N~N~N~N.~N~~~N~N~~bN~bmm~Nbw~~N~N~N~N~
a~~~~~~~~~~m~~~oo~~~~~~~o~wm~~ONN~~~~~~~~N
~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~oooooooo~
l>
r-
."
"
... "
co "
Co "
o "
.... "
"
"
"
"
"
, 0011000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
~ II
,- "
.. "
~ II
'v"
"''''
0"''''
m
..
~
.. ;lJ
ii ..
" " -, Et
'" " " .. -,
'" " " i -
:.. " ..... ..... " .....
III " '" w " ~ - - - '" '" w w- .... ~ '" ..... ~ ..... .... ........'" ~oooo "
" '" '" " OOOOOOOOOOO~~N~~m~ - .... .... 0 0 w -.... - 00 w 0 ..... .......... '" -
"'0
..
~o
1:: " " -, [
... " - " - ~ (5'
~ " " ..
" "':.. " - !!.
~ " i:i:;l " :il '" '" '" "'.... w w "'w.... "'w ~ - '" ~ w ww .... '" ~~ '" w '" '" '" '" - - -
" 0 " -.... - ..... w 0- .... 00 "''''.... CD'" ..... 00 00 ow 00 ..... ..... 0 - .... 0 00 CD .... ..... - w moooo
;;:
..... iii'
0 n
I m
..... ~ iii'
..... " " "
" " 8
" "
'" " NW " W c:
... " CD 00 " 00 - ~~.......... -'" -"'''' W"'- -~.....~ - - - 1/1
'" " 0 -'" " '" OOOOON~.--..J 00 0 ON.OI CD CD- CD-'" o",w CD c.cNmm..... 0 - 0 -....IUI~~......OOO
:I:
~
[
~ ."
" " ~
!'O " "
" " iiii
~ " "
" .... '" " '" iii'
" 0 - 0 " 0 O~N-......................~.....-N-NN-WW..~~.NNNN.....OO_.....___oooooo 1/1
~ "
~ :1
:t: "
NIl
"
"
"
me>> II
-....I ~ II
om,Jlo.1I
~
W
"0
'"
'"
"
"
..... - II
""""~"",,,II
.,JIo..1I
<.n(1lUtIl
~
'"
'"
u.
00
o
"
"
"
ww~1I
00011
,JIo.......1I
"
"
"
"
" '"
IIUlOOOooooOOOOOOOOON.....-W...OONWNNNNWWWWWWNN_O
:r:
[
~ ..... ~-N-NWWWN..N.....W.NNNNN~.NN......_
,JIo.OO-NNNW~ONW(1l.....~O~~N(1l~~~.....wc.cc.com~._(1l~Nc.cm"""'.O~U1
m
0-
c:
g
~
(5'
..
!!.
~ ""'"'" --
· ......NN...........~~~C>>...."'o....o~mmC>>....w"'W~~(1l"""'(1l.....~N.....
U10000ooo~-~mC>>w_mNm,__~ -.m m ~,-""""..........o.w.....ooo
m~;lJ
3 .. III
}i!l.lS;
12 ~
ll._
(5' ill'
a=-
W
o .....-_..... ..................... N __
.-................N~W.~"""'OO.....NN(1lUlmm""""~-mmmC>>c.cw.....mUlc.n--..JmUl.wNOOO
Z
m~g
3 iil :oil
J~~
.. (5' ~
-=i
l>8
< IlJ
.. 0'
:1:.....
!. (D
..
~6
~ w
"';t>
I
tv
m
3
."
f
a
~
'"
..
o
i
::I,
t:/'
c:
-
(5'
"
.,
A>
~J
.....
o
I
.....
tv
~
""
o
'"
Ol
...
Rl
'"
00
o
~
'"
~
'"
CO
'"
~
"
c:
!l!.
~
CO
'"
;;::
o
Q,
~
!!l.
'"
'"
"
Q,
.-..,
'" 0
~ ~
mm
3 3
-0-0
O~~
::r33
~ ~ ~
,.. --
... "
co II
Co II
0"
... "
N"
Q} II
:.. II
~ II
- -
N(..J
0000
OlO
~ II
:-,11
.. II
<0 "
... "
-N
"(..Jo
........
0....0
,t II
"
... "
... "
N"
........
-cc
000'"
'I II
"
<0 "
~ II
- -
-....
0-0
~II
j\) II
<0 "
~ II
~ "
~~
000
~ "
~ II
t "
~ II
--
mto
o:::ltll
w_(IJ w
00 00 00
""""""
00'"
"
"
"
alma'll!
0000(011
<.oCO~1I
........................................................................................................................
coco<.ocooooooooo~~~~mmmmm~~m~~.....WWWWWNNNN~~~~~~
_OJ~m~w:""_oo_m_w_-._C>>_Ul_(.IJ_O_OOp'l_W_N C) -..J Ul f'I,J 0 '"'-l Ul W N...... 0....., (J'l w...... 0 -...J CJ'I No....., c..n N 0 00 9
g8ggggggg~gggg~gb~b~m~bm~~b~Obmb~b~b~b~8N~
oooooooooooooooogggg~ggggogggggggggggggog
... ........................................................................ ~
....~~~~**~******~~mUlc.nc.nUlUl.....WWWWWNNNN................_*~
g ~ ~ ~ :g g ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul r:;:j CJ ~ (,II el!'J _co w...... _... _N _0 _......... _W _N w.... _co _""'-I.. _N w......CD _...... ~ _N _fD w...... w'" _N _co ~
M-...'^-...'--....'^-....'^......^~-...'^-....-N.co.co.m.<'OUl.WCO.CO<.omco.co.<D...<D.co
- - - - - -co - CDCO<DCOCOW<DCDCD<DUlCO<DCOCD"'COCOCOCO<DCOCO<D<D
~~~~~~~~~~gCO~~~~CDCO<'OCD<D<D<DCOCO<D<'OCO<DCO<'OCO<DCOCO<DCDCO<DCO<D
;;::
.......................................i~........................................................................... ~Ol-.
<0<0 <.0 CD 00 000000.....,.....,.....,...... 0) mmUlUlUlUl......WWWWWNNNN....................*
CO-...J.N<D.....,.N<D.....,.....~ ~~mmw~~~.W~O~~.NO~m~~~mw~~=
..,O~~~N~N~N~N.~N~~~N~N~~bNWO~m~Nb~~~N~N~N~N~
~~~~~~~~~wm~~~OO~~~~~~~O~W~~~ONN~~~~~~~~N
[OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~OOOOOOOO~
- -
""""
"''''
"
"
"
11- ~_~
II~oooooOOOOOOOOOOO~NW..~O~~~~.wommN~.~N
"
"
" -
II .(.0)
" 00
" 0
- -NN~m..~WW.WN~~~~~m~~mm~w_
OOOOooOOOOm-NW.~~O.~~~m~~~~.~N.m~~~.~~NOO
"
n N
" 0
" ....
" 0
-- -
-m.~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~gg~~~~~~~~~~~.OOOO
;;::
iii'
n
~
iii
" ~
" ~
II 0
II · C
II~ - NNNNNWWN-~_NN~_~--_ ~
II~OOOOONW~~m~~~NWmOW.~w~.~~~~~w~w.mmwmm~-oo
;;::
~
[
.."
" Ol
II n
II _ ~
II ... ..... ..... _ "
1I00-N-OO--NNNWW.~N~m~O~Wom......~~.NWWW~N....._OOOO~
"
"
II
II N
II 8
II
-- NN-
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~UW~~~~__wwm~~~o~~OO~~~WO
m
Q,
c:
!l
6'
CD - - 5
~OOON.~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mg~~~t~~~~~~~~~~-
"
"
" -
"
"
"
"
II (.oJ
II 0,
" ""
" 0
---N-WW--~ NN--___
.~Nou~-m~o~.~~~~~.....N~Nmm...N_
mmm-m...N~~ONm~-_~~~omo-m-
- ""
OOOOOO-NW~Nmo
OON
Ol
~ ---NNNNN-WWWWN...W--NNNN____ _
~-N~w~m~ON~NN~m~N...mm~~mm~~ON~~m_Nmw_~wNNNO
):0
.-
.."
m
~
If;v
g,~
~ -,
i -
"
-
"'II
8~
i'i' ..
ill 0'
~
et
:J:
!
ml)l;v
3 ~ ~
"'ll .. ..
O'cri5:
'< c: ~
;! l'. ~
!!l ,d'
-,,-
Z
mOO
3 g 'i'
-0 .. ;Q
{~l
~ o' !
-~i':
):0
<
~
;;::
Ol
il'
~
51
CD
..
r3
PJ
t1
.....
(])
.....
o
w
:.-
I
tv
m
3
I
-
I
CD
C
iii'
-
::I,
go
8'
"
.,
CX)
CJ
"
~
,
"',~
.
Part 4 Impact Summary
A. Summarize the impacts this project will have on natural resources.
No significant impacts to natural resources will result from the development of the Town,
Local, specific impacts to natural resources are addressed in these sections: Vegetation
and Wildlife (ADA Question 12), Wetlands (ADA Question 13), Water Resources (ADA
Questions 14 and 17) Soils (ADA Question 15), and Floodplains, Stormwater
Management (ADA Questions 16 and 19), More detailed information regarding these
resources may be found in each corresponding section of this document.
The Town site occurs within the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA)
overlay district, where compact forms of rural development are directed to lands with low
environmental value, Development within the RLSA must be entitled by placing legally
binding land use restrictions on lands with high environmental value, The Town is being
entitled by placing approximately 20,000 acres of environmentally valuable land under
easement restrictions that limit future land uses to agricultural and conservation activities.
Due to the site selection process that stressed avoidance of potential environmental
impacts, and the RLSA mandate to locate development in areas with low natural resource
value, overall impacts to natural resources will be minimal. It is worth noting that the Town
site was chosen for several specific environmental reasons:
. over 91 percent of the site is in active agricultural production and the remainder of the
site is utilized for support activities;
. native vegetation comprises only six percent of the total area;
. the native vegetation generally consists of isolated patches within farm fields and
along farm edges, and has been severely degraded by prior disturbance, invasive
exotic species, hydrologic alterations, etc,
. only 8.8 percent of the site contains SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands
. habitat for listed species is limited and generally of low quality
When considered in the context of net environmental impacts and benefits, the project
provides a significant net benefit to the environment. Impacts to isolated, disturbed, low
quality wetlands within an agricultural landscape will be mitigated through enhancements
to the large contiguous wetland systems outside of the Town boundary that borders Camp
Keais Strand, a regionally significant resource, and enhancement to wetland areas within
the Town, The entitlement of the project under the RLSA program will protect thousands of
acres of wetlands within environmentally sensitive areas from future development. These
environmentally sensitive lands also protect the existing landscape matrix of native
vegetation communities and agriculture, providing long-term conservation for a wide
variety of listed species, including the Florida panther, wood stork, various wading birds,
reptiles, etc, The RLSA program and the Town enjoy the general support of major local
environmental groups, who recognize that appropriately designed development is an
engine for environmental protection within the RLSA.
7123/2004- 135516 Ver 01!- MPERRY
~,
OJ76ti-013-000-PDRl-2B423
10-13
Be
...
B. Summarize public facility capital costs associated with project impacts using the
following table:
Table 10.4.B-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Public Facility Impacts
Total Public Responsible
Facility Phase Capital Cost Entity
Transportation Phase 1 $14,9 m ' Collier County & FOOT
Phase 2 $43.4 m 1,L (Off-Site)
Potable Water Phase 1 $0 Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP
Phase 2 $0 (private)
Wastewater Phase 1 $0 Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP
Phase 2 $0 (private)
Regional Parks Phase 1 $4,3 m ' Collier County
Phase 2 $8,1 m L,'
Community Parks Phase 1 $0 Self-provided
Phase 2 $0
Education Phase 1 $8,8 m " Collier Co, School District
Phase 2 $16,0 m L,' (not includinCl private K-12 school)
Libraries Phase 1 $1,7m3 Collier County
Phase 2 $3,0 m L,"
Jails Phase 1 $1,9 m' Collier County
Phase 2 $3,5 m L,'
Fire Phase 1 $4,1 m 3 Immokalee Fire District
Phase 2 $7,3 m L,3
EMS Phase 1 $1,0 m ' Collier County
Phase 2 $1,8 m L,'
General Government Phase 1 $3,0 m 3 Collier County
Phase 2 $5.4 m L,"
Total $88,5 m 2
(Phase 2)
1 Costs based upon DRI proportionate share calculation methodology,
2 Costs are cumulative and include Phase 1 costs,
3 Costs based on estimated impact fees, applicant's analysis demonstrates that project's
impacts are less than impact fees, based on nature of project and self-provision of facilities,
1/2312004- 135516 Var: QH- MPERRY
-
0371l6-01J-OQO.PDRI_28423
10-14
rac
QUESTION 11 - REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY
A. Project the funds anticipated to be generated by the project. This projection should
include any source or use of funds which could have any reasonable connection to
the proposed development.
1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in
which any construction and/or development takes place:
(a) Yearly ad valorem tax receipts
(b) Yearly impact fees collected
(c) Yearly sales tax received by local government
(d) Yearly gasoline tax received by local government
(e) Yearly projections of any other funds by any other sources generated
as a result of development of the proposed project within the region
The Town of Ave Maria will generate excess revenue over cost to Collier County, The
operating revenues generated by the Town are provided in Table 11.1.1 and include ad
valorem, sales tax, utility taxes, gas taxes, tourist taxes, permit fees and license fees.
These annual operating revenues are estimated to reach $13.4 million by 2010 and
$36,6 million at build out.
Ad valorem revenues are projected in Table 11.1.1. The development program and
taxable value calculations are provided in Tables 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The Town is
forecast to generate $4,77 million in ad valorem taxes by 2010 and over $15,1 million in
ad valorem revenue each year for Collier County at build out.
Sales tax and tourist tax revenues are provided in Table 11.1.1 and calculated in Table
11.2.3. The Town is forecast to generate over $358,200 in sales tax revenue and
$51,700 in tourist tax revenue in 2010, At build out, sales tax revenue is expected to
exceed $842,793 and tourist tax revenue is expected to reach $188,000 each year for
Collier County,
Gas tax revenues are projected in Table 11.1.1. The Town is forecast to generate over
$1,2 million in gas tax revenue each year for Collier County at build out.
Based on current millage rates, the School Board is projected to receive annual
operating ad valorem revenues of $3,5 million and capital ad valorem revenues of $1.4
million by 2010 (Table 11.1.1). At build out, operating ad valorem revenues will reach
$10,0 million and capital ad valorem revenues will reach $4,1 million per year,
2. List all assumptions used to derive the above projections and estimates,
show the methodologies used and describe the generally accepted
accounting principles used in all assumptions, estimates and projections.
The assumptions used in the revenue generation calculations are provided in Tables
11.2.1.through 11.2.5. Properly taxes were calculated using 85 percent of the sales
7/23/2004.135516 VN: 011- MPERRY
~~
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
11-1
raG
...
price, less the Homestead exemption (for 70% of single family households and 55% of
multifamily), and multiplied by the appropriate millage rate,
Sales taxes and tourist taxes were based upon projected sales. Additional assumptions
are located on Table 11.2.3.
Gas taxes, franchise fees, licenses and permits, fines and forfeitures and other revenues
were calculated using a per capita methodology. This methodology arrives at a per capita
amount for each revenue item in the County Budget. These per capita averages are then
applied to the projected new population,
712312()()4.. 135516 Ver 01!_ MPERRY
,-,
03786-013"OOO-PDRI_28423
11-2
"
.
~
~
!
>-'
>-'
I
W
>
Q
<
"
.
~
~
""'
N
o
~
"~
.
~
~
.
N
.
.
~
"
,
.
",
~
~
~
.
8
~
~
.
~
II
"g
~
:g
.
.
<>
~
~
~
.
"~
~
il
,
~
".
"
o
~
o
~
"~
,
~
~
".
.
,
~
c
~
~
,
~
c
~
".
~
"
~
~
,
!
"
.
.
"
~
!
.
-I () 0 rI
~~. ~ !
; ~ ~ i
Co ~ ~ it
~ ~ ~ ~
!r l5" < ::r
~ ~ ~ i
:6;' g
i ~ a
~
.!'
~
"0
.
.
"0
8
:::E~
- 0 .
_ _ 0
<>> ....
o _
. .
~
'"
.
,
;.
8
"~~ ~
o ,
. .
. "
"<,0> .0
& u:: m
~
<>
.
"
".
~
:::I~
.w m
. ,
;~~
. . ~
~
<>
.
"
~
o
~I~
0..... .....1"
. 0
~ g
a.o>~
~ ~ $
~
".
.
o
"
~
~i~
~ t-~
o .
0......-."
8l.....fJ
~
~
s
~illl;
...
:,.. (.0,\0
~ ~
~
"~
~
o
ilN ~
. III 0
"g: ~-:3:
...
~
".
"'
"~
o
~i~
. 0
-.... :..
-~ j!j-~
~ ::3 to
, . .
~
"0
.
o
'.
8
~i~
o ,
'i-.JIOW
0' 0
N . 0
~~l1
_ N ~
~
".
.~
o
;i~
"8: .."it
N .
N~~
8, 0
~
"8
"~
~~~
~ w {::
- ~
tl_il
. N -
~
"'
c
o
"" ~
U
~~-~
a~~
'::i~
"<is .....-g
. . ,
-'-" ....-...
~ g ;!)
~;~
- - ~
~~,
~ ~
o 0
'::i"~
_ _ 0
~g~
"~ -"t
080
-
-l ~ -0 :;; "'U m 11
~~~~~~;;
3 i ~
1l <I> 9;
~ ~
.
.
"
.
~
.
.
~
~~. II i'l
~ <;) 10 0
"... ... u.-...
~ ~ lZ g:
MM
~ "
o.
"..,11l
ON
0'
I"
~
~~~
~tj~
, 0 ,
......... ~
8 j;; N
""1Il~
W QI u\
..... ~ B
N"I\) 'w
g; ~ ~
~~
-10 0_
. ,
00
I~
~
~~~g~i
-~rs.~-~~~
I~
~
~im~~~~~
-~r~.~-~~~-&-~
I~
~
hH
~ rj ~ ~
~
"""""",10
~ ~ g ~
b 10 10-<.1>
N .,. 10 N
ON Q\ W
~
~~
d~
~
t! "" M.-..I
~-~~~
. N .
~"m -~ i
~ ~
~ ~
o .
"'0
~ ~
~
;~~:::~~:g~
_*g)_S_~_Sl~JS_~
n~~~@i:~~
I~
~
~ ~
':: ~ 1:::::g ~!Ii"'
(;j :: l:;j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
$"'-IOO.:;jo~~blo
0> :::: g IS (:l: 0
~
~
~!:H-:
_ ..
. . N
~-s:-::g
. 0 N
I~
-~~
"10 ~ ~
~ . .
0. 81-10
;;j (J)gj
~M
~ ~
. N
tv'N
. ,
o 0
I~
~~1::::~'::!i;
_~l8_g_~_8wwi5
~~~~~~~~
I~
~~1::::l!;:
N i$ 15 t: .". Ql
~ .....-gg w -....-....
o ~ _ ~ ~ ~
I~
;~M~
o ..
.", Ol -~"o
." -
,- .
-.. <0"_-:'"
:g li5 ~ ~
M
g:~~~
''1 -~-O>
~.~ ~ 21
'"-l","a>"""
~ g ~ ~
I~
I~
~
" ~
~
..
I'
.
.
c
.
i
.
;
n
o
.
M
~ -
_ 0
b-...
~ ~
w"_
gi:
M
~ ".
ON
"~
-lD"""
N .
0_
M
o
m .~
~ -~
~~.~~~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~~o
'" 2'~ftll$"C: ~iIlfii!!!g~::Ii!.<
~~~a!1d.ii~~-i;UQa!.~'lI;;;1[ o~k
~ ~ i & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ s
~iiij~~[w~~~~~~~~ab~~'
i~!~~!I[i!~~3~i~~~i~i
i~!1~33 ~ ~ ;[il~
'. ~~~~ i ~ ~~~~~
II! - ;a ft a: hi ~ ~ i
~ N ~g;~~
- '-' ie" ct. -- c
- g
~~
~
~
I~
Ii
~
~
~
I~
I~
I~
~
Fo
Ii
~
~
o
~
i
;I
"
~
g
c
.
.
-
;;
Jil
.
~
~
~~"" to'! lit
~,~t~~;~~~&~~~~~~n~~
~~~~gt~~~~~~~~~~$~1It
'" N &".... W ~ ~ w... ~ ~ 0'" w ~ DO ~ 0
II
..
.
..
i
! -~!
r~ ~ ~
-
o
<>
)l
~
.
III
M
.
..
~
,.
:
,
U!
!<
.
;.
!l
l:
~
~i
i- ~ ~
lJ"'" ~ ~
",,:3:-..g
"~~ ~~
!<
.
~
i
II
~
.
!!<
i
i- E
C3.8i
8 ~
M
"
~
i
ill
o
II
"'
.
~
~
.
i::::::
g1 iO 8
~ N ,
w V. U\
~ ~ t
1:1
N
iI
o
...
~
.
~~
~~
w:"
o.
.-
~~i
.s t ~
:g~!!foo'I(;l~
-...j g g: id ;>> -..I ~
il:8"~"~"~"l!l"~
OlwJ>.>IOWUl.llo
~..rJ
i!S &: ~
"0 t: g
N. ,
~~
_N
~~
;"-(]I
~-
.0
.... to'! ....!a........"'"
~~~~g~~8~~~;j~
-....~"~.;3-2t~~.g:~"~-8:~
~ '" go w ~ '" OJ (11 "":S; :S... N
~i~s~~ii
~-~ t ~ -~'s -~ ~
~~M
~~~~E
~~1r8~
~ ~~
_0.
-.... -.--
o ~ ~
..0
~
~;~t:l~~~~~~
~ ~ g ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~'8-S~.~~~-~-~
~~4oIl 4oIl~MM~4oIl
~~~~~.~*~~~
~~~~~;~i-~~
~ ~
::::: ~
. -
'"...J -~
. .
00
M
~!"
~ 0
- ~
:"'0
. .
. ,
~
~~E~
is -..I ()I W
.~ ~ -~ ~
~
~~~i-~
"~.~:: a, a,
u;;:j ~ ~::;
Ei~~~
~~~~~
~~
~~
" 0
"()Ii:>>
. .
. .
~~~~~~~S~~~~~~4oIl~~
~t;i:Zl;;;:-..I~o[gtial-..l~[gls::l::w
~~~~g~~~~~~~8~~~~
-~g:t3~!1~~~
.0> N_~ $:_:: .l:l.-..I ,lD
~~~~~~~~
~
~~~$~
-..I ~ 0 ~.....
UH~
4oIl_~ttI~,~~4oIl~
~g:*~~-..I~~
....o..w lo.W"" "'....
w~~~RJ~g~
~
.... _~ 40Il
!:!];j ~ ~
(P) ... ~ ~
~*~~
~::::::~~M~!'1
~~~~~~H
~"~-~.~~"~~~
~ ~
~ e
g-g:
N.
!'l
~~,!1~~~~
~Si~~&t;~:':l
~-e~'~'~-~'~~
1:1
".
.
~
!
~~~ ~ M
N~J'.l ~ ~
wbo~m-...~~--..I
(3w.!jl8eale
~"~"~"~"~"~~'~
~~
o.
~ "
O'"...J
~ ~
~ ~
~!HaC~'"
~ o;:s ~ ~ ~
~"~~'~'~-~
1:1
o
..
~
0.:
o
~8~ ~ -~
t~ ~.~
-
.
,
il
,.
~
i::::::
()I~J
o . _
. . .
_ 0 N
~
~
~
"
~
1:1
,.
~
~
4oIl,~..~,~....n"4oIl~M
~~~~~~~!E~~~~
"()I "CD ~ '" '0> '0 --..I....."~"'" -lfi-~
::Jmm~;!:;N1.S!Slt~...t;
~
~"-
~~
..
Ole
. .
~.
(hM~
o N ~
, , .
o. ~
~~~
~M
~ ~
~ N
b"-l
- .
" .
"ll ~
~ ii
~81
. ~
ttI _~ ~
~ ~ .
_ , .
..,,"~ ()1
g ~ ~
~~t:
_~,~ JV
. , ,
w ~ !!l
~M
_ .
N _
o ,
-'-J'''''
" 0
- .
~
~ ,;:)
U&
"::j~'8;
o . ~
~E
~.. N-....
!:l8lt;,~
~"~ ~.~
~~
~ ~8 ii -~ '::
~ - -
o . -
-~.~~'~-~
~1:
~ N
"~ "~
. ,
~~
- .
8!~t
loioa,
it ;j ~
~1l1l ~
... lD .... lS-m
()I w ~ -./
o '-J ... ~
lo: -J:S"rg ~-~
w ~ -..I ..... 0>
M
I~~i~~~i~~i~!~~
" _ . _ , _ , . . ./'J" . " _ .
~$!Sg~~Si!(1I~2~-!2U;~
l:I;;';~'-Jwwl5imo>....~gj(;l;(:)()I
u
2H~~~i~Z1$-=4oIl
f'J,....I'.l_f1>.~.~,W,-.l.~~
....~O(:)....~...(1Ite~
Zl ~ RJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 (:)
1:; ~~
~U
aiD"w
it.1S
~!<
~ e!(! -~'~
w-..llSlQt;,
"m"tJ.~"w ~
~ lQ.... [g (.l1
~
t: -~
~ ~
-Ol"ty
w,
, .
~ ~
_ N
'g '~
.0
""-01
: ~
~ n ~
~ ~ 8-
I!!. f ii'
3!;'
c
~r
~
~
I~
I~
I~
I~
~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
~
~
.,
CX)
c-:>
>-'
>-'
I
...
-
~ ^' p ~ ~ Q =~~ z 0 0 "
~^' i " ~ 0 . . . .
" ..~ p! ~ ~ " . "" ~ ~ ~ .
~ f 1; ~ q ~ rgl:, l:, . H p " c c .. !! ~
" ~. l: g m ~. . ~ ~ , 0_ g I . ~i ~ lih [ 0
-1 3 3 "'II "0 ~ "'" ~. c m 33, . g ~
~ ~ ~. i - a't.?~ ~ ~ . it ~ ~-i'~
~N ~ 0 a~
. ~ ~ ~ g=r g " j. . c
. ~ p ~ it ~ o ~ 3 W
. 0 l'! ~ go I ~ E.
~ . j. F ~ OJ!: . ~ , . i
iI o . ~ .C!E. i
. a [I ~ . ., .
a g B l " ~ c r
,
~ " .
.C! .'! c > c
,
. . :;; 3
.
< .
. i
iI
"
~
fj:
<
[
.
,
i
!l
g
.
@
~
-~
~
~
;.
8
~
~
-~
.
-.,
8
II
~
-.
::
-0
o
o
~
~
~
8
~
~ H~
~UU~
~ ~
Ui ::~~
h H~
rUllU~
~-~ H~
~~Il~H
~ if! ""...
UJH
UJH
~
~
'"
~
~
~
0.
"
-N
~
-.,
8
I~ ~~::
01 -'" (.oJ ..
-" -2::-e
8 15.... N
dll~H
~
-"
~
.~
"
-~
8
111 lH~
~ ~ H~
UllH~
~
-~
,
-.
~
il
o
111 ~~~
U~H
UdH
~
-,
,;
-.
~
"8
UJU
~
~
-N
~
~
Ij t:tl....
ItiH
~
N
-"
~
.
-0
8
"8
o
~11 H~
~~ ~~~
S8!lSH
::
-"
~
.
-"
8
~
:: 't!~~
i- SN~
~~ ~~.a
g~:g~~~
~
N
-"
~
-~
~
o
I:: r~r
.... 0 N 01
~ "gH
U!lsH
~
N
-0
~
8
i
i 11 Hi ~
Us1J~
8~~~~~
~
i ii
~ ~~
hH
:: ~~
~ ~ ~
~ H
hH
~ ~ t!
~ ~ ~
~ -00"6
, N ~
hin
~ ~~
~ "Cj ~
~ N N
~~~8
~ :: II
;j ~ 18
~ "g to
, '0
hU
~ tJ~
J\) ~ is:
~ iBiJ
1" ,~
8r.g8~
~ <II tot
~ ~ g
o '0:.> ':.,J
::j ~ ~
hH
~
-&: ~ ~
, ~,
~ Sl~
~ ';;:"6
8 ill 8 8
~ ~
~~H
Uh
~ ~
un
~ ~
S;H
.... <:) '-l (.ol
t~~~
" -0 g
" 8 0
~ ~
S~ ~-~
.... 0 'I (.oJ
t ~ -~"*
~oH
i! ~-~
- ,~
-t; j". ~
N e ~
-01 "8 g
800
-~ ~,~
~I di
t; -. ~
N e ~
~sH
Ii
I~
Ii
~
~
I~
m
~
~
~
I!
I~
I~
~
w
N
L
_N
8 ~
-'
8 ~
-'
8 ~
N
,
~t;;
N
-'
8 ~
~
~ffi
N
,
<>
8 ~
N
-'
g ~
N
,
h
N
,
<>
8 ~
N
,
"8 :;]
N
,
"~ ~
N
,
~~
N
-'
h
-.
,
.
s
N
b
,
~
-j
~
N
'"
.
N
'"
~
N
-.
~
~
"
-8
~
-"
iii
"
"*
-0
;;j
"
~
.
"
'"
~
.
-0
.
N
-8
N
.
~
~
.
.
-~
~
~
~
~
-~
~
~
~
~
-"
~
"8
o
-~
~
b
o
o
~
-"
N
~
~
0;
0;
0;
0;
0;
0;
8
8
8
Ii
8
~
o
.
o
o
Ii
.
8
~
-8
0;
~
Ii
::
o
'"
8
~
8
~
,
8
~
~
~
N
8
8
~
m
,
.
'"
8
~
m
<>
8
o
~
~
.
~
~
~
"8
o
~
~
.
~
-8
o
~
~
~
'0
o
~
"
~
~
;.
8
~
,
'8
~
'"
o
o
~
~
'"
8
.
~
'"
8
.
,
"
'"
8
~
o
,
-"
8
~
.
-~
s
~
~
"8
o
~
~
~
~
8
~
~
~
i!
N.
o ~ ~
II
o~~
N
'"
.
o
m)J
o ~ 0
w
'g
_ N
-.... -Ql
, -
000
~
--
N
o
- "
-....,-w
o g; d
.
-0
0;
N"
-sill
000
-~
8
N'
o ~-~
,
ill
o
N ~
oH
m
~
" ~
~ w-oo
~,-
000
0;
"
~
o
" .
g ~~
~
. .
":"'-00
~N'
o. .
~
. .
.,.-....-<)0
~ N ,
O. ~
~
. ~
....-....00
~ ~ ~
O' ~
~
. .
g ~-~
"8
o
~
. ~
-l'>:""'Qo
~ N'
O. .
Ii
~
~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
~
~
I~
I~
~
IF'=;\
~r;:.;J
~'
"'-
f~ UHP~I~
lIril ;o--ia-113
"" g>> g>o
::O~:J9:<6~<;:;o
!l ... Q. iU >( ltl QI :i
~gCllg~'"Cl3g.cn
rn il. ~ &' ." ~ ~ 5'
It li'if~;a.;a.~
f!! '<_ ~3
<15 "t:I3~ alii
.p ctl ctl... - ;a.
::!J "'!!!..::o G) 0
. 2?eIl 0 a-=o,
c: ,,~ ~ 8
$W ~
'=' 2
g
0.
"
~
"
!l<
~
~
Q,
~
~ ~ 5
~jI! ~~w!:l~
i:::l~tll~8~~!!.
m
~~ i~~i~
!}!}",!}lg.",,,,
l3': zr. 0: l3': 2r. CD ell
il.il.il.il.il.--
Qv ctl to CIl CD ~ ~
it~H~r!
~ Q) Q) Q,l Q) 3 3
9 CD (it lii Ii lil (tI
Q)"----aa
}! --
5'
o
>-'
>-'
I
Vl
~
or
iiJ
~
il.
~
;a.
"'
Q,
rn
'"
o
:g
l
~
it'
.iiJ
~
~
~
~
IV
'"
~
~
~
IV
~
~
"0
iV
-
g
=,
!!
='
if
~
"
Ii
-i~~!:I
S. N~
!!? _ () :I.
gO~a
~-g..o
[g~-
o' g C' 0
~ ~ a.
0&0
.-s"
OOO&,
!1. ". g> <
Gl c:
~ ~
. Gl
!1 -
-
'"
tll
~
'" '"
tJl tJl
~~~
'"
~
~
~ ~
!<l !<l
~Ilg~
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
~~~
'"
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
...,. ~
~Ilg ~
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
~r:g~
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
~Ilg ~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
.N .N
8~8
~
~
~
~
'" '"
~ ~
~Ilg~
~
~
~
~
'" '"
C5 cJ
~ ~
~r:g~
~
~
~
IV
'" '"
~ ~
~~~
~
~
~
IV
~ ~
IV IV
~~~
~
~
~
IV
! !
IV IV
~~~
~ i
.IV .N
12llg12
~ ~
......,. ........
12llS 12
~ ~
12llS12
i ~ ~~u~~lf
~ ~ ~~rn!!!.-~
N ~ U;-i~~;O,.
o "" ~iiif'i'8m
~_ ~ :xs, 033.
-i ~ ~ "&'~
~ &' or -,
~ m CIl ~
~ ;a.
"
ffi
0'
b'
c:
"
'" '"
.01 ~.~
~ ti~~
~lglgi~~
'" '"
.Dl ",~.t:l
~ S~~
~lglg~m~
'" '"
~ "''''~~
~ .~~~~
~lg~tm~
'" '" '"
f:I09 <.n ..... tltO'l
t:o't W .01 :"'~.""".N
~ ~ ~ .81S~8i
~ ~ ~lg~~m~
'" '" jI!
~ r .c:I ~iI't~.~
.~ ~ ~ .81S~~
~ ~ ~lg~~~~
.~ i",~~
\:l .IVS~fll
~lg~~m~
'"
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
'"
'" .N
~ @
-:!:: ..
01 12
'"
'" .01
~ ~
~ ['I
~ ~
'" '"
tit <5 ~ tlt8~
'" Ol .00"';l'!'W.
~ ~ Q)5Q1\S~c.o"""
1.0 w ~e::s. ...m~
-.... ~ i;j~S!wffi!oi'!:l
~ ""'.J ......t:; ......c,;J\J
'" '"
~ '" ~
i ~ ~i~~~~
~ ~ ~~~~~~
'" ~
@ ~
N :....
ts 8
'" '"
~ '" ~
.~ "'~l'!tl.!<l
~ll!~15"'Sl?
~w9'l.....o;c=s
~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" ~
~ !8 .~",~~~.t
f ~ ~~.()jfl1~~
~ ~ ~~~~~~
'" '"
~ '" -
~i~~~~
~~~~~~
'" '"
- '" ~
.81",~~~.lil
~~.()j~~~
~~~~~~
'" '"
~ !8 .8i!8~~~'~
- ~ ~fl. fl1~_
~ ~ ~~!lj~~"8
'" '"
- '" -
.81",.IV~~.lil
~~.~~~~
~~~~@~
'" '"
- '" -
.81lll~~~.lil
~fl.()j~~~
~~~~~~
'"
'" )0
~ ~
~ ~
'"
'"
1!l 3l
- .N
~ 1f
1!l 18
- ~
~ ~
'"
'" .'"
~ ~
~ ~
~ g> ~ ~I<
~ij ~i ~
1Il!3!r
! .!!!-~
2 5'
~ ~
- ;a.
:E
i=
_t I"'i
oao~
-
o 0 ~~ I~
-
oco~~ I~
O~~~ Ii
- tJl 1'70'"
ow......-....I =
0l0-
8
- ~ I-~
o tJ;.....-""-J :::
o~
- t
~ ~ ~i I~
~ ~ ~~ I~
~ 01
~ffi~~ I!
~ffi8i I~
~ffi811~
~ffi8~ I~
~ffi811~
~ffi8~ I~
~ffi811~
iI'~ii'
ifii
...,~~
lIln-
)C 0 N
n c:'
~~'"
c:
!i!
g'
--"Till
Q)
C"")
-
Table 11.2,4
Collier County
Fiscal Impact Assumptions
Taxable Assessment Ratio
Homestead Exemption
% Singie-Family with Homestead
% Multifamily with Homestead
~
Collier County
Unincorporated
Fire & EMS
Water Pollution Control
Cnty popuiation-Working Residents
Cnty Population-Non-Working Residents
County Population (total)
(FI Population Studies, Jan '00)
County Employment (total)
(State of Florida ES-202, Q3, 2000)
Persons per Household
Total Households
Hotel Assumctions
Average Occupancy
Average Persons per Room
Emolovment Assumctions
General Office & Medical
Retail
Restaurant-Sit Down
Restaurant-Fast Food
Hotel
Golf Course
Golf/SwimlTennis Club (sq,It,)
Multifamily-ACLF (beds)
Institunonal/Government (sq It)
Movie Theater
Students
Total
Students per Household
Value Assumotions
Single-Family
Single-Femily
Single-Family
Single-Family
Multifamily
Multifamily
Multifemily
Multifamily
Multifamlly-ACLF (beds)
Office (sq,It,)
Office Medical (Sq.It.)
Retail & Entertainment
Hotel (per room)
Golf Course (holes)
Golf/SwimlTennis Club (sq.It,)
85% (From Property Appraiser's data
$25,000
70% (From Property Appraise(s data
55% (From Property Appralse(s data
3,8772 Mills
0,8069 Mills
1,5000 Mills
0,0347 Mills
107,368
170,089
277,457
Equivalent
Factor
0,7619
10000
Full-Time
Eauivalent
81,804
170 089
251,893
107,368
0,2381
25,564
2.21 (FI population Studies, 2002)
113,864 (FI Populetion Studies, 2002)
42.5%
1.2
~
218 sq, It, per employee
498 sq, It, per employee
400 sq, It, per employee
150 sq, It, per employee
0,50 employees per room
40 per 18-hole course
300 sq, It. per employee
0.3 per bed
938 sq, It, per employee
500 sq, It. per employee
37,845 (School District)
0,2261 (independent stUdy)
Pro iect Data
$195,000 (Developer)
$225,000 (Developer)
$400,000 (Developer)
$195,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$220,000 (Developer)
$125,000 (Developer)
$80,000 (Developer)
$83 (Developer)
$ 125 (Developer)
$90 (Developer)
$100,000 (Developer)
$333,333 (Developer)
$75 (Developer)
11-6
.,
Q)
CJ
,
,[f
Table 11.2.6
Collier County Budget FY 2002
FY 2002
General Special Dobt Per Capita
Elms! BU!DY! ~ Total All Funds Amount
311000 Ad Valorem Taxes $125,356,268 $21,568,839 $828,260 $147,753,367 Ca Iculated (1)
312100 Local Option Sales. Use and Fuel Taxes $11,186,732 $11,186,732 $39,33 (1)
312300 County Ninth-Cent Voted Fuel Tax-Sales $508,400 $508,400 $1,79 (1)
313500 Cable Television-Franchise Fees $3,183,108 $3,183,106 $11,19 (1)
314200 Telecommunications-Utility Sevices $1,283,809 $1,263,809 $4.44 (1)
321000 Occupational Licenses $1,542,628 $1,542,626 $5.42 (1)
322000 Building Permits $10,775,593 $10,775,593 $37.89 (1)
329000 Other Licenses, Permits, Fees $173,240 $470,486 $543,726 $2,28 (1)
331200 Public Safety-Federal Grants $299,788 $3,577,573 $3,877,359 $13,83 (1)
331500 Economic Environment-Federal Grants $2,507,427 $2,507,427 $8,82 (1)
331890 Human Services-Federal Grants $8,865 $245,984 $254,849 $0,90 (1)
333000 Federal Payments In Liu Of Taxes $819,491 $619,491 $2,18 (1)
334200 Public Safety-Stete Grants $2,303,859 $2,303,859 $8,10 (1)
334390 Other Physical Environment-State Grants $835,901 $835,901 $2,24 (1)
334490 Other Transportation-State Grants $1,928,448 $1,928,448 $6,78 (1)
334500 Economic Environment-State Grants $2,834,921 $2,634,921 $9,28 (1)
334820 Public Welfare-State Grants $188,689 $188,689 $0,66 (1)
334700 Culture/Recreation-State Grants $947,583 $947,583 $3,33 (1)
334900 Other State Grants $3,517 $3,517 $0,01 (1)
335120 State Revenue Sharing Proceeds $8,460,825 $349,000 $6,809,825 $27,03 (2)
335130 Insurance Agents Licenses $96,800 $96,800 $0,38 (2)
335140 Mobile Home Licenses $98,718 $96,718 $0,38 (2)
335150 Alcoholic Beverage Licenses $138,434 $138,434 $0,55 (2)
335160 Pari-Mutuel Distribution Replacement $113,700 $332,800 $446,500 $1.77 (2)
335180 Local Government Half.Cent Sales Tax $23,447,549 $3,183,900 $26,611,449 $105,65 (2)
335490 Other Transportation-State Shared $18,691 $18,691 $0,07 (2)
335500 Economic Environment-State Shared $33,930 $33,930 $0,13 (2)
335700 Culture/Recreation-State Shared $35,446 $35,446 $0,14 (2)
337100 General Government Shared $196,051 $196,051 $0,76 (2)
337500 Economic Environment-Local Grants $89,947 $89,947 $0,36 (2)
341100 Recording FeesnCharges for Services $3,097,126 $3,097,126 $10,89 (1)
341200 Internal Services Fees and Charges $1,772,074 $340,983 $2,113,057 $7,43 (1)
341550 Supervisor of Election-Charges for Services $27,061 $27,061 $0,10 (1)
341800 County Officer Commission and Fees $835,294 $635,294 $2,94 (1)
341900 Other General Government Charges and Fees $329,351 $1,850,897 $2,180,248 $7,67 (1)
342300 Housing for Prisoners-Charges for Services $18,900 $18,900 $0,07 (1)
342500 Protective Inspections-Charges for Services $13,081 $13,081 $0,05 (1)
343700 Conservation and Resource Management-Physical Environment-ChargeE $88,390 $88,390 $0,31 (1)
343900 Other Physical Environment Charges-Physical Envlroment-Charges for S $583,062 $563,062 $1,98 (1)
344900 Other Transportation Charges-Transportation-Charges for Services $51,836 $51,836 $0,16 (1)
346400 Animal Control and Shelter Fees-Charges for ServIces $127,649 $37,184 $164,833 $0.58 (1)
347200 Parks and Recreation.Charges for Services $6,075 $1,102,994 $1,109,069 $3,90 (1)
347900 Other Culture I Recreation-Charges for Services $696,787 $1,258,851 $1,955,638 $6,88 (1)
348110 Filing Fees-County Court CrimInal-Court Related Revenl $36,180 $36,180 $0.13 (3)
348120 Service Charges-County Court Criminal-Court Related R $341 ,978 $341,976 $1,23 (3)
348210 Filing Fees-Circuit Court Criminal-Court Related Revenu $160,790 $160,790 $0,58 (3)
348220 Service Charges-Circuit Court Criminal-Court Related R. $146,812 $146,812 $0,53 (3)
348230 Court Costs..circuit Court Criminal-Court Related Reven $248,270 $248,270 $0.89 (3)
348410 Filing Fees-Circuit Court Civil-Court Related Revenues $325 $325 $0,00 (3)
346420 Service Charges-Circuit Court ClvU.Court Related Rever $1,147,809 $1,147,809 $4,14 (3)
348520 Service Charges-Traffic Court (Criminal and Civil)-Court $224,189 $224,169 $0,81 (3)
348530 Court Costs-Traffic Court (Criminal and Civll)-Court Rela $30 $30 $0,00 (3)
348720 Service Charges-Pro bate-Court Related Revenues $165,776 $165,776 $0,60 (3)
349000 Other Charges for Services-Other Charges for Services- $8,260,803 $710,806 $6,971,609 $24,51 (1)
351000 Judgments and Fines-Fines-Fines and Forfeitures $3,835,528 $429,738 $4,265,266 $15,37 (3)
354000 Violations of Local Ordinances-Flnes-Fines and Forfeitul $56,960 $125,726 $182,666 $0,66 (3)
359000 Other Fines and/or Forfeitures-Other Fines and Forfeitur $1,481,352 $182,831 $1,664,183 $6.00 (3)
361000 Interest-Interest and Other Earnings-Interest and Other I $8,878,757 $2,285,040 $539,955 $11,703,752 $41,15 (1)
363100 SpecIal Assessment/lmpacr Fees $1,963,146 $196,212 $2,158,358 $7,69 (1)
364000 Disposition of Fixed Assets-Sales-Sales $41,129 $437,260 $478,369 $1,68 (1)
365000 Sale of Surplus Materials and Scrap-Sales-Sales $700 $700 $0,00 (1)
366000 Contributions and Donation$ from Private Sources-ContI $77 ,447 $161,679 $229,126 $0,81 (1)
369000 Other Miscellaneous Revenues-Other Miscellaneous-M $5,694,482 $865,383 $15,247 $6,575,112 $23,12 (1)
361000 Interfund Transfers In-Non-Operatlng-Other Sources-Tn: $1,427,077 $9,695,969 $9,078,135 $20,401,201 $71.73 (1)
383000 install Purchases ProceedslCapital Le21ses-Proceeds-Other Sources $28,547 $28,547 $0,10 (1)
384000 Debt Proceeds-Proceeds--Other Sources $3,626,929 $18,297,956 $21,924,685 $77.08 (1)
390000 Depreciation on Fixed Assets Acquired with Contrib-Proprietary Non-Oper $0 $0,00 (1)
Total $193,907,105 $91 ,388,~90 $33,308,865 $318,604,560 $1,120,18 (1)
Balancing Revenue (automatic calculation if needed) $0 $0 $18,493,168 $18,493,188 $65,02 (1)
Total Net of Capital Revenues $193,907,105 $85,798,515 $14,615,697
11-7
CX)
CJ
.;;
-
Table 11.2.15
Collier county Budget FY 2002 FV 2002
General Special Debt Per Capita
E!!l!lI Revenue ~ Total All Funds Amount
EXDenditures $745,909 $2,62 (1)
511 Legislative-General $745,909
511 Legislative-General $79,724 $79,724 $0.28 (1)
512 Executive-General $663,656 $663,656 $2,33 (1)
512 Executive-General $28,333 $28,333 $0.10 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $15,873,816 $57,691 $15,931,507 $56,01 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $5,790,544 $14,997 $5,805,541 $20,41 (1)
513 Financial and Administrative $4,238,978 $2,996 $4,241,974 $14,91 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $2,072,471 $2,072,471 $7,29 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $232,134 $232,134 $0,82 (1)
514 Legal Counsel $2,852 $2,852 $0,01 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $102,681 $4,119,051 $4,221,732 $14,84 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $97,038 $1,039,747 $1,136,785 $4,00 (1)
515 Comprehensive Planning $5,740 $42,508 $48,248 $0.17 (1)
517 Debt Service Payments $33,304,089 $33,304,089 $117,09 (1)
519 Other General Government $7,533,467 $1,532,829 $9,066,296 $31,88 (1)
519 Other General Government $5,767,668 $3,729,704 $9,497,372 $33,39 (1)
519 Other General Government $930,915 $852,807 $1,783,722 $8,27 (1)
519 Other General Government $1,610,293 $42,459 $1,652,752 $5,81 (1)
521 Law Enforcement $63,773,512 $5,195,833 $68,969,345 $242.48 (1)
521 Law Enforcement $12,853,158 $2,091,868 $14,945,026 $52,54 (1)
821-6 Law Enforcement. Capital $4,381,175 $735,681 $5,116,866 $17,99 (1)
522 Fire Control $1,128,553 $1,128,553 $3,97 (1)
522 Fire Control $534,178 $534,178 $1,88 (1)
522-6 Fire Control. Caplt.1 $40,176 $40,176 $0,14 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $6,964,232 $6,964,232 $24.48 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $3,238,533 $3,238,533 $11,39 (1)
524 Protective Inspections $622,427 $622,427 $2.19 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $347,468 $46,485 $393,953 $1,39 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $47,530 $625,802 $673,332 $2,37 (1)
525 Emergency and Disaster Relief $11,648 $134,207 $145,855 $0,51 (1)
527 Medical Examiners $713,330 $713,330 $2,51 (1)
529 Other Public Safety $817,031 $817,031 $2,87 (1)
536 Water/Sewer Services $391,254 $391,254 $1.38 (1)
536 Water/Sewer Services $31,477 $31,477 $0.11 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management $1,969,737 $1,969,737 $6,93 (1)
537 ConservationiResource Management $678,339 $131,822 $810,161 $2,85 (1)
537 Conservatlon/Re5ource Management.Capltal $47,104 $520,423 $567,827 $2.00 (1)
537 Conservation/Resource Management.Grants $0 $0,00 (1)
538 Flood Control/Storrnwater Control $15,555 $15,555 $0.05 (1)
539 Other Physical Environment $1,860,528 $1,860,528 $6.54 (1)
539 Other Physical Environment $10,116 $6,415,023 $6,425,139 $22,59 (1)
541 Road/Street FacUlties $8,273,391 $8,273,391 $2909 (1)
541 Road/Street Facilities $6,079,616 $6,079,616 $5,82 (1)
841.6 Road/Street Facilities $4,151,852 $4,151,682 $14.80 (1)
544 Mass Transit $2,053,764 $2,053,764 $7,22 (1)
553 Veterans Services $189,486 $189.486 $0.75 (2)
553 Veterans Services $17,257 $17,257 $0,07 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $199,115 $513,712 $712,827 $2,83 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $92,652 $185,527 $276,179 $1.10 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $3,669 $530,809 $534,478 $2.12 (2)
554 Housing and Urban Development $342,837 $4,556,786 $4,899,623 $17,23 (1)
562 Health $60,285 $80,285 $0,24 (2)
562 Health $1,344.444 $1,344,444 $5,34 (2)
562 Health $612,904 $612,904 $2,43 (2)
562 Health $1,109,805 $1,109,805 $4.41 (2)
563 Mental Health $926,100 $926,100 $3.68 (2)
564 Public Assistance $327,011 $416,015 $743,026 $2.95 (2)
564 Public Assistance $3,107,496 $224,551 $3,332,047 $13.23 (2)
564 Public Assistance $14,131 $14,131 $0,08 (2)
569 Other Human Services $149,093 $149,093 $0,59 (2)
569 Other Human Services $19,152 $19,152 $0,08 (2)
569 Other Human Services $32,500 $32,500 $0,13 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $4,944,014 $415,750 $5,359,764 $21,28 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $309,219 $976,593 $1,285,812 $5,10 (2)
572-6 Parks/Recreation $71. 167 $1,047,104 $1,116,271 $4.44 (2)
572 Parks/Recreation $2,138,753 $11,754,656 $13,893,409 $55.16 (2)
573 Cultural Services 159239 $159,239 $0,63 (2)
579 Other Culture/Recreation 420188 $420,188 $1,67 (2)
579 Other Culture/Recreation $309,624 $309,824 $1,23 (2)
581 Interfund Transfers Out $39,325,238 $6,087,619 $4,776 $45,417,633 $159,68 (1)
11-8
-
..,
ex>
CJ
-
Table 11.2.6
Collier County Budget FY 2002
FY 2002
General Special Debt Per Capita
El!I!ll Bm!lllS Service Totel All Funds Amount
590 Other Non-Operating Dlsburtlements $1,058,617 $1,056,617 $3,72 (1)
604 Clerk of Court Administration $630,531 $630,531 $2,27 (3)
604 Clerk of Court Administration $179,135 $179,135 $0,65 (3)
604 Clerk of Court AdminIstration $29,771 $29,771 $0,11 (3)
606 Jury Management $77,774 $77.774 $0,26 (3)
606 Jury Management $6,886 $6,866 $0.02 (3)
606 Jury Management $2,059 $2,059 $0,01 (3)
611 Court Administration $24,463 $24,463 $0,09 (3)
611 Court Administration $6,299 $6,299 $0.03 (3)
612 State Attorney $136,500 $136,590 $0.50 (3)
613 Public Defender $125,375 $125,375 $0,45 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $677 ,249 $677,249 $2.44 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $43,956 $43,956 $0.16 (3)
614 Clerk of Court $7,796 $7,796 $0,03 (3)
631 Court Administration $16,719 $16,719 $0.06 (3)
631 Court Administration $7,010 $7,010 $0,03 (3)
631 Court Administration $422,699 $422,699 $1.52 (3)
634 Clerk of Court $37,427 $37,427 $0,13 (3)
634 Clerk of Court $11,193 $11,193 $0,04 (3)
654 Clerk of Court $311,094 $311,094 $1,12 (3)
654 Clerk of Court $27,545 $27,545 $0,10 (3)
554 Clerk of Court-Capital $8,236 $8,238 $0,03 (3)
674 Clerk of Court $130,434 $130,434 $0,47 (3)
674 Clerk of Court $11,353 $11,353 $0,04 (3)
674 Clerk of Court $1,639 $1,639 $0,01 (3)
694 Clerk of Court $265,567 $285,567 $1,03 (3)
694 Clerk of Court $22,051 $22,051 $0,06 (3)
694 Clerk of Court.Capital $2,677 $2,677 $0,01 (3)
713 Information Systems $1,304,710 $1,304,710 $4,70 (3)
719 Other Operating Court Costs $95,934 $95,934 $0,35 (3)
721 Court Administration $9,199 $9,199 $0,03 (3)
721 Court Administration $1,628 $1,628 $0.01 (3)
722 State Attorney $138,590 $136,500 $0,50 (3)
723 Public Defender $125,375 $125,375 $0,45 (3)
724 Clerk of Court $693,167 $693,167 $2,50 (3)
724 Clerk of Court $84,361 $54,361 $0,20 (3)
724 Clerk of Court $13,169 $13,169 $0.05 (3)
741 Court Administration $9,198 $9,198 $0,03 (3)
741 Court Admlnlstratlon $1,626 $1,626 $0.Q1 (3)
744 Clerk of Court $:140,677 $540,677 $1.95 (3)
744 Clerk of Court $54,083 $84,083 $019 (3)
744 Clerk of Court $17,183 $17,183 $0,05 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $795,631 $795,831 $2,87 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $45,879 $45,679 $0,17 (3)
764 Clerk of Court $9,961 $9,961 $0,04 (3)
100048 Total $193,907,105 $91,388,590 $33,308,865 $316,604,560 $1,120,16 (1)
B.f.ncing Expenditure (Iutom.tic c.Jcuf,tion If needed) $4,452,342 $384,738 $0 $4,837,080 $17.01 (1)
Total Net of Capital Expenditures $189,454,763 $88,413,777 $33,308,868
(1) Divisor includes FTE population + FTE Employment + FTE Tourists
(2) Divisor includes FTE Population
(3) Divisor Includes FTE Population + FTE Employment
11-9
...
".",
....
....
I
....
o
.-
i i.
CO --i
g '"
~ m
- <t
Gl ~
~::a
~ ~
3 ~
'" 0
;? 0
'0 '"
'" 11>
~ -
~
"0
o
o
~
GlGlI
000
S::;[
~~;:
~ ~ [
'" -
S-g:o
(n' ; ~
Q Q. a
C '" 0
0'-3
5' -
C
'"
'"
~I
010 ;0 ;0 ;0 ;0
;ll;ll '" '" '" ~
II II ~ ~ ~ i1
(I) (Il C C , I
, I i:i) Ql Z (')
s:: 0 ::J :::J (fl 0
'" 1il lit lit <0' 3
~~~oS:2
~ ~ ;:0: :J. ~ 2.
..-- 0 ~ 0 ~
4l5~5"8.:o
g,:r:::J:c_~
ro I~ :0 (1) "2 ~
~ 0 (l) .., :.!:; ~
0'1- .... ..... ..... 0
:J -...... -0. 0
ll) 1"0 "0 000
;:~oogc.1
_.....oJg, ,,:::l
.;; 18 I~ ~
~131
. I I
1
;;:: )>
C (')
!if ,-
ll) "
2, ~
-< ii1
I 5'
,-'"
o I
:E 0
ffi' 3
" '"
'"
~
(');;::cn
o c:: :r
a. 3=. (C
o or (i"
3 3 ;;r
~: ~ 2.
~a:-<
-<g.
3 Cl
~ ~
ll) '"
@ ~
'"
'"
o
o
'" '"
"''''
00
o 0
I
'" '"
'" '"
00
00
I I I
"'(:I't"'iR"'-EA~~~{,lI
~~~~~~o~c,.)~
o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
'"
....
*
I I
'"
N
~~
~(.<tt3~~~
~~w~c>>wN~""''''''~
~ g ~ ~ :::J c:.-; ~ ~ 01
~
'0
o
o
~
f,It ~ "'ER
~~~~~m~~~~~
"O.(}'IO'I'Oo."""o""....l-,I:I.wo.::
~~:::J~~~~~~~O)
I I
'"
-~ ~
'" 0
'" '"
"'''''''
..::& wA .01
~ ~ '"
.......'"
'" 0 N
-EAof;I't~ER .fA "''''iltER~....~EA~
~~~~~~~~~~~~:j~~g
i
;
~ ...."'.&If
o~~-~-~
~::~~S
~~~~~
~~~~~
....4OFt-ERER
~ ~ ~ ~
C:001OlO'l
~""'''''
~ ~ ~
.... ~ ~
o en i:n
000
ER~~!!~~!! ....-ER
N-(.r,)"'w""....J-"""OO~iA......~.....
~~~~~~S~6:::J:::J:::J
o 0 0 ~ woo ~ w m ~ ~
o 000 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0) 0) 0)
I
I
I I
I
I
I
~
~~g;~-"""
t:8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~~
~~
o 0
"'''''''
~ ~ N
.~
o
.""" "'....J
~ ~
o 0
iA""f,oItiA{A
.N N ...... ...... tv
<0 "<0 Co .co <0
Ol 0'1 -....J -..J 0'1
o 000 0
I
il
I:!!
;;
~
!
I
Iii
i~
a:
11
i
Ii!' I,
~ I
- (') --i
3 2. ..
~i'lf
~ ~ ~
"n-
It g ;.,
;"
t1 "
1O~
'"
I
~
co
C":)
-
Table 11_2.7
Collier County
Imcact Fee Revenue
iiH WI l.Qil = = WJ. = = iW. = =
Ragde 'moRct Fe. RevenUI $4,025,390 $4,020.390 $4,020,390 $4,020,390 $3,009,144
Slng~ Family $3,167,520 $4,020,390 $5,015,240 $5,015,240 $5,015,240 $4,025,390
Multjfamily $975,800 $1,150,050 $975,800 $975,800 $2,021,300 $975,800 $1,672.800 $9715,800 $2,021,300 $975,800 $1,651,890
ACLF/Nurslng Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $274,050 '0 '0
Retail $350,768 $489.461 $516,586 $481,509 $530,138 $564,418 $595,508 $462,376 $618,627 $480,712 $410,558
O1f1ces $289,030 $393,554 $435,363 $439,908 $597,147 $495,351 $486,079 $675,313 $489,897 $304,482 $345,382
insUtutional $4,872,400 $534,858 $788.358 $788,358 $840,358 $872,858 $880,658 $983,358 $1,043,158 $1,086,924 $1,164,114
Hotel/Motel $445,500 '0 '0 '0 'A 'A $567,000 $0 '0 5607,~00 '0
Go~Course '0 'A $360,560 $360,560 $0 $180,280 '0 '0 $360,560 'A '0
Gol!/5wlmrrennis Clubhouse WJli E. ~ E. WQ.lli. E. E. E. E. ill ill
To\al Roada ImplctFeea $10,166,188 56,593,332 $8,254,631 $6,081,374 $9,134,523 $7,114,096 $8,229,435 $7,122,236 $8,832,982 $7,480,607 $6,561,088
= WI iiH = = WJ. = = iW. = =
I=lr.lml:U1,r.tl=eeR.llenue
Sing~ Family $211,200 $268,400 $334,400 $334,400 $334,400 $268,400 $268,400 $268,.400 $268,400 $268,400 $200,640
Multifamily $123,200 $145,200 $123,200 $123,200 $255,200 $123,200 $211.200 $123,200 $255.200 $123,200 $208,560
ACLFINursing Home '0 '0 'A $0 '0 '0 '0 '0 $45,000 '0 '0
Retail-Community $15,400 $21,490 $22,680 $21,140 $23,275 $24,780 $26,146 $20,300 $27,160 $21,105 $18,025
Qlflcell $11,130 $15,155 $16,765 $16,940 $22,995 $19,075 $18,795 $26,005 $18.865 $11,725 $13,300
Insttlulional $655,900 $72,000 $106,1213 $106,125 $113,125 $117,600 $118,1350 $132,375 $140,425 $146,317 $156,708
Hotel/Motel $38,500 '0 '0 '0 $0 '0 $49,000 '0 '0 $52,500 '0
Golf Course Acres
C;olf/RwimrrennlsCluohouse awl ill &W. E. WIlIP. E. E. E. E. ill E.
Total Fire Impact Fees $1,058,830 $522,245 $611,920 $601,805 $755,995 $652,955 $692,090 $570,280 $755,050 $623,247 $597,233
iiH WI = = = WJ. = = iW = =
EMS 'moRt F.e R.llenLl4l
Sin91e Femily $62,400 $79,300 $98,800 $98,800 $98,800 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $79,300 $59,280
Multifamily $29,120 534,320 $29,120 $29,120 $67,020 $2Q,120 $47,720 $29,120 $67,020 $20,120 $47,006
ACLF/Nursing Home '0 'A 'A 'A 'A 'A 'A 'A $34,650 '0 '0
RBtlil_Community $9,372 $13,078 $13,802 $12,865 $14,165 $15,080 $15,911 $12,3M $16,529 $12,844 $10,970
Qlflce $2,639 $3,594 $3,976 $4,017 $5,768 $4,524 $4,457 $6,587 $4,474 $2.781 $3,154
Institutional $63,716 $6,994 $10,309 $10,309 $10,989 $11,414 $11,516 $12,809 $13,641 $14.214 $15,223
Hotel/Motel $4,180 $0 '0 '0 '0 '0 $5,320 '0 $0 $5,700 '0
Coif Course 'A 'A $8,120 $8,120 $0 $4,060 'A '0 $8,120 'A '0
Colf/SWlmrrennls Clubhouse $2,100 $0 $5,2150 '0 $4,200 '0 'A 'A $0 '0 $0
MOllie Theater E. E. E. E. E. E. &ill ill E. E. ill
Total EMS Impact Fees $173,527 $137,286 $169,377 $163,232 $190,942 $143,498 $167,188 $140,220 $213,734 $143,958 $135,723
= WI l.Qil = = WJ. = = iW = =
perks ImDact Fee Revenue
Single Family 5384,480 $488,610 $608,760 $608,760 $608,760 $486,610 $488,610 $488,610 $488,610 $488,610 $3M,266
Multl1ilmtly $153,HI0 $168,5<10 $153,160 $1l:i3,160 $317,260 $1l:i3,160 $262,560 $153,160 $317,260 $153,160 $259,278
ACLF/Nursing Home $0 '0 '0 'A $0 '0 'A 'A $176,400 '0 'A
HnlAlfMotel w.m E. ill E. E. E. - E. E. ~ ill
TolaIParklllmpactF.e, $580,760 $677,170 $761,920 $761,920 $92S,020 $641,770 $806,050 $641,770 $982,270 $700,570 $624,534
iiH WI = = = WJ. = = iW. = =
L1braN lmDact Fea Rlllyenue
Single Family $143,520 $182,390 $227,240 $227,240 $227,240 $182,390 5182,390 $182,390 $182,390 5182,390 $136,344
Multifamily $66,640 578,540 566,640 $66,640 $130,840 $66,640 $109,440 $66,640 $130,840 $66,640 $108,012
ACLF/Nursinc Home ill ill ill E. E. E. ill E. E. ill ill
Total Library Impact Fees $210,160 $260,930 $293,880 $293,880 $358,080 $249,030 $291,830 $249,030 $313,230 $249,030 $244,356
= WI iiH = = WJ. = = iW. = =
PUbliC Bu.ldlnol Imollet Fee R.yenUe
Single Family $103,421 5131,431 $163,7l:i0 $163,750 $163,750 5131,431 $131.431 $131,431 $131,431 $131,431 $98,250
Multifamily $60,329 $71,102 $60,329 $80,329 $124,967 $60,329 $103,421 $tlO,329 5124,ge7 $1l0,329 $102,128
ACLF/Nurslng Home 'A 'A 'A 'A $0 'A 'A $0 'A '0 '0
Retail-Community $66,994 $78,138 $82,464 $76,865 $84,628 $90,100 $95,063 $73,811 $98,754 $76,738 $65,539
011.. $25,644 $34,917 $38,627 $39,030 $52,980 $43,949 $43,304 $69,916 $43,465 $27,014 $30,643
Inltltutional $562,200 $61,714 $90,964 $90,964 $96,964 $100,714 $101,614 $113,464 $120,364 $125,414 $134,321
HolSl/MolBl m.lli. ill E. E. ill ill = ill ill ~ ill
Total Buildings impact Fees $829,533 $377.302 $436.134 $430.938 $523.289 $426.523 $502,763 $438,950 $518.980 $450,851 $430,881
= WI l.Qil = = WJ. lW = iW. = =
J..II Facllltle. ImDact Fee Rflyenufl
Single Famiiy $56,630 $71,968 $89,665 $89,665 $89,665 $71,968 $71,968 $71,968 $71,968 $71,966 $53,799
Multifamily $33,034 $38,933 $33,034 $33,034 $66,428 $33,034 $56,630 $33,034 $68,428 533,034 $55,923
ACLF/Nursing Home '0 '0 '0 '0 'A 'A '0 'A $18 '0 $0
Retail-Community $48,048 $67,049 $70,762 $65,957 $72,618 $77,314 $81,572 $63,336 $84,739 $65,848 $56,238
Office $42,167 5117,416 563,1115 $64,178 $87,118 572,267 $71,206 598,522 $71,471 $44,421 $50,388
Institutional $219,268 $24,089 $35,475 $35,476 $37,618 $39,279 $39,630 $44,251 $46,942 $48,912 $02,385
Hotel/Motel $25,740 '0 'A 'A $0 '0 $32,760 $0 '0 $35,100 '0
GolI/Swlmrrennls Clubhouse ~ E. ~ E. = E. ill E. ~ ~ E.
Total Jail Facilitiell Imp.ct FlIea $430,494 $2~,434 $306,492 $288,310 5366,877 $293,861 $363,766 $311,111 $343,666 $299,282 $268,733
= WI = = = WJ. = = iW. = =
SchoOllmoact F.. R.llenue
Single Family $853,440 $1,084,580 $1,351,280 $1,351,280 $1,351,280 51,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $1,084,580 $810,768
Multitamlly $231,560 $272,910 $231,560 $231,560 $479,660 $231,560 $396,960 $231,560 5479.660 5231,560 $391,998
ACl F/NUrRina Home m m m ill ill E. m ill = m ill
Total School Impact Fees $1,085,000 $1,357,490 $1,082,640 $1,582,840 $1,830,940 $1,316,140 $1,481,540 $1,316,140 $1,936,390 $1,316,140 $1,202,766
11-11
"
ex:>
c-:>
Be
"-
,.
PART III. Environmental Resources Impacts
QUESTION 12 - VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE
A. Identify the dominant species and other unusual or unique features of the plant
communities on Map F. Identify and describe the amount of all plant communities
that will be preserved in a natural state following development as shown on Map H.
Existing Vegetation Associations
The habitat and vegetation survey included the preparation of a Florida Land Use, Cover
and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) map delineating the major vegetation
communities, landforms, and land uses present on the project site, Land use /Iand
cover associations within the project area were delineated at a 1 "=400' scale on true-
color aerial photography taken in April 2003, Mapping was performed by certified
ecologists and/or qualified field biologists, utilizing the FLUCCS Level III or Level IV
classifications (FDOT, 1999), Vegetative and land use mapping was conducted
primarily during the latter half of 2003, The locations of the various FLUCCS types are
displayed on Map F-1 of this ADA.
A significant factor in mapping vegetative associations and land uses on the Town of
Ave Maria site is the historic disturbance within nearly all vegetated areas not currently
under cultivation within the Town boundary, Many of these areas were once cleared of
native vegetation and utilized for row crops, pasture, equipment or supply storage, or all
of the above over time, Remnant furrows, ditches, berms, and other signs of disturbance
are present within these vegetated areas, In most cases, the history of disturbance has
demonstrably altered the natural hydrology of these areas, and produced vegetation
communities dominated by pioneer plant species and invasive exotic plants,
Invasive exotic plant species such as Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), torpedo
grass (Panicum repens), Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), cogon grass
(Imperata cylindrica) and Caesar-weed (Urena /obata) are commonly encountered in
varying densities within the project site, Four levels of exotic density were mapped by
WilsonMiller using photo interpretation and field observations, Code modifiers are
appended to the FLUCCS code to indicate the approximate density of exotic species in
the canopy or understory, as follows:
E1 = Exotics 10-24%
E2 = Exotics 25-49%
E3 = Exotics 50-75%
E4 = Exotics 75-84%
Areas were mapped by WilsonMiller as Brazilian pepper (FLUCCS 422 or 619,
depending upon wetland status) when Brazilian pepper constituted more than 75% of
the canopy and subcanopy strata, and native vegetation in these strata provided less
than 15% cover. Melaleuca (Me/a/euca quinquenervia) does occur sporadically on site,
but not in densities high enough to be reflected in the FLUCCS mapping,
Nuisance plant species, as defined by SFWMD and other agencies, are non-native
species which tend to out-compete native species and become quickly established,
7/231200.4-135526 Ver: 011. MPERRY
O~
03766-013-000.PDRI-26423
12-1
Be
especially in areas of disturbance or where the normal hydro period has been altered,
The most common nuisance plant species found on site was common primrose willow
(Ludwigia peruviana), which dominated the wetland vegetation communities in several
areas,
Map F-1 depicts the present land use and land cover on the 4995:1:-acre Town of Ave
Maria site, The native plant communities shown on Map F-1 are not unusual or unique,
Large acreages of vegetation associations with similar characteristics are common in the
region,
Table 12.A-1Iists each of the vegetation associations (FLUCCS categories) depicted on
the enclosed Map F-1, along with the cumulative acreage of each association and the
percentage of the total property acreage accounted for by each association, The intensive
mapping identifies distinct FLUCCS categories to allow detailed project planning and
evaluation of impacts,
The following paragraphs provide a general description of the vegetative associations of
the FLUCCS categories provided on Map F-1,
Improved Pastures (FLUCCS Code 211)
These areas, located in the northeastern and north-central portions of the site are
utilized as cattle pasture and undergo intensive maintenance such as brush clearing,
mowing, burning, re-seeding with pasture grasses, fertilization, and maintenance of
water ponds, The improved pastures contain no canopy species, with only widely
scattered Brazilian pepper and cabbage palm (Saba/ palmetto) in the sub-canopy,
Groundcover pasture grasses are dominated by Bahiagrass (Paspa/um notatum), with
lesser amounts of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dacty/on), smutgrass (Sporobo/us indicus),
and torpedo grass, Ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiifolia), dog fennel (Eupatorium
cappilifo/ium), Caesar-weed, broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), and other common
species also occur in the groundcover,
Unimproved Pastures, 10-25% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 212E1)
These areas are utilized as cattle pasture and undergo limited maintenance such as
brush-hogging to remove overgrown shrubs and grasses, A small area of unimproved
pasture occurs in the south central portion of the site, a remnant of a much larger
pasture area that has now become infested with Brazilian pepper.
Row Crops (FLUCCS Code 214)
These areas are generally comprised of tomato fields, with smaller acreages of row crops
such as peppers, eggplants, etc, These row crop areas include associated agricultural
infrastructure (e,g" field ditches, internal roads, etc,), Row crops comprise over two-thirds
of the total Town acreage (3357 out of 4995 acres), and are located throughout the site,
Sod Farms (FLUCCS Code 242)
Sod farms are planted with St. Augustine grass, which is harvested and sold as sod to
residential and commercial customers, The sod farms occur on the eastern portions of the
site,
Other Open Lands - Rural (FLUCCS Code 260)
7/2312<104- 1~5526 Ver. 01!. MPERRY
o~
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
12-2
Be
, ,:.'ll'1'
These areas contain facilities that support agricultural operations, such as office trailers,
garages, machine shops, farmworker lunch areas, etc,
Fallow Crop Land (FLUCCS #261)
Fallow crop land consists of fields that have been recently cropped, but are not currently in
production due to agricultural leasing, crop rotations, reduced planting area, etc,
Table 12.A-1: Existing Vegetative Associations and Land Use Descriptions
FLUCCS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
211 Improved Pastures 583,1 11,7
212E1 Unimproved Pastures, 10-24% exotic cover 5,2 0,1
214 Row Crops 3356,8 67.2
242 Sod Farms 327.4 6,6
260 Other Open Lands - Rural 28.4 0,6
261 Fallow Crop Land 133,0 2,7
3100 Herbaceous (Dry Prairie), disturbed 5,3 0,1
321 Palmetto Prairies 42,8 0,9
329 Other Shrubs and Brush 18,7 0.4
330 Mixed Ranaeland 39,5 0,8
411 Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory 15,2 0,3
Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory, 50-75% 0,5 0,0
411E3 exotic cover
Pine Flatwoods, saw palmetto understory, >75% 0.6 0,0
411E4 exotic cover
4160 Pine Flatwoods, araminoid understorv-:- disturbed 9,0 0.2
Pine Flatwoods, graminoid understory, 50-75% 35,1 0,7
416E3 exotic cover
422 Brazilian Peooer (upland) 36,7 0,7
434 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed 4,0 0,1
434E3 2,2 0,0
512 Aaricultural canals 25.4 0,5
617 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 1,3 0,0
618 Willow 16,2 0,3
618E2 Willow, 25-49% exotic cover 1,1 0,0
618E3 Willow, 50-75% exotic cover 8,0 0,2
619 Brazilian Pepper (wetland) 91,2 1,8
621 Cvpress 8,0 0,2
621E2 Cvpress, 25-49% exotic cover 0,2 0,0
621E3 Cvpress, 50-75% exotic cover 8,0 0,2
624E1 Cvpress-Pine-Cabbaae Palm, 10-25% exotic cover 1.4 0,0
625 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods 6,8 0,1
625E3 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, 50-75% exotic cover 1,8 0,0
625E4 Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, >75% exotic cover 1,7 0,0
630E4 Wetland Forested Mixed, >75% exotic cover 9,9 0,2
631 Wetland Shrubs and Brush 12,5 0,3
6310 Wetland Shrubs and Brush, disturbed 22,0 0.4
641 Freshwater Marsh 27,9 0,6
712312004.135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
OM.
0376e-Ol3-000-PDRI.28423
12-3
8e
-
FLUCCS Description Acreage Percent
Code of Total
6419 Freshwater Marsh, Primrose Willow Predominant 1,8 0,0
6410 Freshwater Marsh, disturbed 1,5 0,0
641E2 Freshwater Marsh, 25-49% exotic cover 1,1 0,0
641E3 Freshwater Marsh, 50-75% exotic cover 0,5 0,0
641E4 Freshwater Marsh, >75% exotic cover 3,1 0,1
643 Wet Prairie 30,2 0,6
643D Wet Prairie, disturbed 35,8 0,7
740 Disturbed Lands / Barren 0,7 0,0
8145 Roads and Hiahwavs, Graded and Drained 33,5 0,7
Total 4995.0 100.0
Herbaceous - Dry Prairie, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 310 D)
One small area (5,3 acres) of this upland vegetation community was mapped on the
western portion of the site, It is not a native dry prairie, but a cleared former pasture that
has regenerated to a wide variety of species, Major plant species include gallberry (/lex
g/abra), bushy bluestem (Andropogon g/omeratus), rusty Iyonia (Lyonia ferruginea),
wiregrass (Aristida spicata), Caesar weed (Urena /obata), and saw palmetto, with
scattered highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), Vines include muscadine grape
(Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia),
Palmetto Prairies (FLUCCS Code 321)
These open areas occur mainly as isolated communities within and bordering the large
pasture areas on the northeast portion of the site, They lack a significant tree canopy and
are dominated by saw palmetto, Various upland grasses and forbs (e,g" smutgrass) are
found in the open spaces between clumps of saw palmetto,
Other Shrubs and Brush (FLUCCS Code 329)
One area of this upland shrub community occurs at the northeast corner of the site, The
area shows signs of historic clearing, and has some degree of Brazilian pepper infestation,
Common shrub species within this area include wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), saltbush
(Baccharis halimifolia), saw palmetto, and rusty Iyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), Groundcover
species include bahiagrass, smutgrass, ragweed, torpedo grass, flat sedge (Cyperus spp,),
Caesar-weed, love vine, and Muscadine grape vine,
Mixed Ranoeland (FLUCCS Code 330)
This upland community occurs in the southern portion of the site, and consists of grassland
and shrubland in approximately equal proportions, Shrubs include wax myrtle, saltbush,
and Brazilian pepper, Groundcover consists of a wide variety of grasses and ruderal
species, including bahiagrass, Caesar-weed, dog fennel, torpedo grass, goldenrod
(Euthamia minot'), broomsedge, bushy bluestem, ragweed, Asiatic coinwort (Centella
asiatica), and Muscadine grapevine, "Volunteer" (unplanted) sugar cane (Saccharum
officinarum) plants occur in some portions of this community,
Pine Flatwoods. Saw Palmetto Understory (FLUCCS Code 411)
These pine f1atwoods, found mainly in isolated patches within the westem portion of the
site, consist of a slash pine (Pinus elliottil) canopy with an understory of saw palmetto,
Scattered gallberry, rusty Iyonia, myrsine (Rapanea punctata) and wax myrtle are present
7123120004-- 135526 Ve,: 01!. MPERRY
O~
0378G-013-000.-PDRI_28423
12-4
Be
in the sub-canopy, The groundcover stratum is dominated by saw palmetto, Associated
species consist of wiregrass (Aristida spp,), Caesar-weed, bracken fern (Pteridium
aquilinum), and pennyroyal (Satureja rigida), Vines include lovevine, Virginia creeper,
muscadine grape, catbrier (Smi/ax bona-nox) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
Pine Flatwoods, Saw Palmetto Understorv, exotic cover 50-75% (FLUCCS Code 411 E3)
This small patch of pine f1atwoods occurs at the southern end of the entrance road, The
native cover is comprised of slash pine canopy and saw palmetto understory, with 50-75
percent areal coverage by Brazilian pepper in the sub-canopy,
Pine Flatwoods, Saw Palmetto Understorv. exotic cover> 75% (FLUCCS Code 411 E4)
This small patch of pine f1atwoods also occurs at the southern end of the entrance road,
The native cover is comprised of slash pine canopy and saw palmetto understory, with
more than 75 percent areal coverage by dense Brazilian pepper in the sub-canopy,
Pine Flatwoods. Graminoid Understorv, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 416D)
This upland community occurs on the eastern portion of the site, and experienced prior
clearing of understory species on one or more occasions, The sparse canopy consists of
slash pines, with few sub-canopy plants such as wax myrtle and sa~bush, The groundcover
is strongly dominated by Caesar-weed and ragweed, with small amounts of broomsedge,
dog fennel, etc,
Pine Flatwoods, Graminoid Understorv. exotic cover 50-75% (FLUCCS Code 416E3)
Approximately 35 acres of this upland community occur near the center of the site, The
area had been historically cleared for pasture and row crops, but has become overgrown
over the last two decades, The slash pine canopy includes scattered cabbage palm, The
sub-canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper, but also includes wax myrtle, slash pine,
saltbush, and gallberry, The groundcover consists of bahiagrass, smutgrass, scattered saw
palmetto, Asiatic coinwort, flat sedge, cogon grass (/mperata cylindrica), dog fennel,
Muscadine grape vine, and poison ivy,
Brazilian Pepper (FLUCCS Code 422)
These communities generally occur on disturbed upland areas (e,g, , old spoil piles or
benns) where Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominates the canopy, sub-
canopy and groundcover and exceeds 75% of the total plant cover. Native species
comprise less than 15% of the canopy and sub-canopy strata, Associated plant species
(when present) include ragweed, Caesar-weed, dog fennel, muscadine grape (Vitis
rotundifolia), sandspur (Cenchrus /ongspinus), Spanish needles (Bidens alta),and other
ruderal species (plants adapted to disturbed areas),
Hardwood - Conifer Mixed (FLUCCS Code 434)
Two areas were mapped to this community type, one along the northern site boundary, and
one remnant community within the improved pasture, The canopy consist of slash pine,
cabbage palm, and laurel oak, with a sub-canopy of myrsine, wax myrtle, and Brazilian
pepper. The groundcover includes saw palmetto, cabbage palm, muscadine grape vine,
swamp fern (B/echnum serrulatum), and cabbage palm seedlings,
Hardwood - Conifer Mixed. 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 434E3)
This small area, near the northern site boundary, is very similar to the FLUCCS 434
community described above, but contains Brazilian pepper that comprises 50-75 percent of
the vegetation cover.
712312004-135526 Ver 01!-MPERRY
~c
03786-01:J.-{)OO-PDRI.28423
12-5
Be
,"' ....
~
Aqricultural Canals (FLUCCS Code 512)
The FLUCCS system (FOOT, 1999) does not have a separate code for large agricultural
canals, but Wilson Miller assigned a FLUCCS code 512 to these features, These large
canals convey agricu~ural stormwater from fields and deliver water into the permitted water
retention areas that occur just outside the western boundary of the site,
Mixed Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCCS Code 617)
One small isolated patch of this forest type exists near the center of the site, west of the
entrance road, The canopy species include cypress (Taxodium distichum), red maple
(Acer rubrum), cabbage palm, and scattered sweet bay (Magnolia virginiana), Sub-
canopy species include wax myrtle, myrsine, cabbage palm, and dahoon holly (/lex
cassine), Patches of swamp fern and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense) occur as the
predominant groundcover. Old world climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum), an exotic
invasive species, is well-established in the western half of the forest patch,
Willow (FLUCCS Code 618)
Mapped areas of willow occur east of the existing farm haul road, These areas are all
ditched and bermed systems, typically with a dense ring of Brazilian pepper around the
periphery, Willow (Salix caroliniana) dominates the sub-canopy, with a handful of other
species (e,g" dahoon holly) occurring in shallower water along the edges, Groundcover
species include primrose willow, arrow head (Saggitaria lancifolia), pickerel weed
(Pontedaria cordata), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), swamp fern, and balsam apple
(Momordica charantia), Aquatic species typically consist of duckweed (Lemna minor') and
water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), White vine (Sarcestemma clausum) commonly occurs to
such an extent that it hinders walking through the willow areas,
Willow, 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 618E3)
These areas are similar in character to the willow communities described above, but
Brazilian pepper occurs throughout much of the wetland, comprising 50-75 percent cover,
The number of native plant species observed in this exotic-infested community is lower
than in uninfested areas,
Willow, >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 618E4)
Brazilian pepper dominates the sub-canopy in these areas, but willow comprises more than
15 percent of the cover. As with the prior category, plant species diversity is limited,
Exotic Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCCS Code 619)
These communities generally occur within historically disturbed wetland areas, often at the
interface of agricultural and non-cultivated areas (e,g" isolated cypress domes, former wet
pastures, etc,) Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) dominates the canopy, sub-
canopy and groundcover and exceeds 75% of the total plant cover, with less than 15% of
the cover consisting of native species, In some of the older Brazilian pepper stands, the
OBH (diameter at breast height) for the trees is 12 inches or more,
Cypress (FLUCCS Code 621)
This community is composed primarily of bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), with or
without minor amounts of red maple, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and red bay (Persea
borbonia), Oahoon holly, cabbage palm, and wax myrtle typically occur in the subcanopy.
Ground cover species may include swamp fern, Royal fern (Osmunda regalis),
pickerelweed, arrowhead, buttonbush (Cepha/anthus occidentalis), saw-grass, and catbrier
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 011. MPERRY
0_
0378&-013-000-PDRI.28423
12-6
8e
..4.
.
,
,{-
(Smilax auriculata), Scattered epiphytes such as wild pines (e,g" Tillandsia f1exuosa, T.
fasiculata), golden polypody (Phlebodium aureum), etc, may be found on the cypress in
most locations,
Cvpress, 25-49% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 621E2)
This small area (0,2 acre) occurs within an isolated wetland on the northern portion of the
site, Brazilian pepper comprises approximately one-third to one-half of the plant cover,
Cvpress, 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 621E3)
These communities can be found in a few isolated wetlands within row-crop fields, Brazilian
pepper comprises between one-half and three-quarters of the plant cover,
Cvpress-Pine-Cabbaoe Palm, 10-24% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 624E1)
This community includes cypress, pine and cabbage palm in the canopy stratum, in
combinations where no species achieves dominance, Sub-canopy species include wax
myrtle, saltbush, cabbage palm, slash pine, and scattered cypress, Groundcover consists
of bahiagrass, torpedo grass, Asiatic coinwort, and scattered swamp fern, Brazilian pepper
comprises approximately 20% of the plant cover.
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods (FLUCCS Code 625)
Small areas of this community are scattered across the site, The canopy is dominated by a
slash pine, The sub-canopy may include slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, myrsine wax
myrtle, saltbush, dahoon holly, and scattered saw palmetto, Groundcover species include
wiregrass, swamp fern, Caesar-weed, marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellate), flat
sedge (Cyperus Iigularis), and bushy bluestem,
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods. 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 625E3)
These areas generally occur within isolated wetlands, adjacent to Brazilian pepper
monocultures (FLUCCS 619), The community is similar to the f1atwood vegetation
described above, but with less species diversity and more than 50 percent cover by
Brazilian pepper.
Hvdric Pine Flatwoods, >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 625E4)
These small areas are similar to the previous category, but Brazilian pepper cover exceeds
75 percent. Slash pine comprises at least 15 percent of the canopy,
Wetland Forested Mixed. >75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 630E4)
This category includes mixed wetland forest communities in which neither hardwoods nor
conifers achieve a 66 percent dominance of the crown canopy composition, A small area
of this type, near the center of the site, contains a canopy of slash pine, cypress, red maple,
and laurel oak, The sub-canopy includes Brazilian pepper, with minor amounts of cypress,
cabbage palm, myrsine, and wax myrtle, Ground cover is sparse, but contains patches of
swamp fem and sawgrass,
Wetland Shrub (FLUCCS Code 631)
This area, in an isolated wetland east of the existing farm haul road, consists of mix of
shrub species that includes Brazilian pepper, wax myrtle, and saltbush, The groundcover
species include Bahia grass, Asiatic coinwort (Centella asiatica), dog fennel, scattered
smutgrass, Caesar-weed, ragweed, and other ruderal species,
7/2312004.135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
CAlI43
03766-013-000.-PDRI-2B423
12-7
8e
,...
Wetland Shrub, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 6310)
A 22-acre area of this community occurs on the west-central portion of the site, The area
was formerly under row crop production, and remnant furrows, raised beds, and field
ditches are plainly observed, The vegetation community is a broad mixture of shrub and
ground cover species, Scattered canopy trees account for less than 10 percent of the area,
and include slash pine, red maple, cabbage palm, and laurel oak, The sub-canopy contains
Brazilian pepper, wax myrtle, saltbush, cabbage palm, red maple, slash pine, and gallberry,
among other things, Groundcover includes bahiagrass, Caesar-weed, bushy bluestem,
marsh pennywort, Asiatic coinwort, chalky bluestem, dog fennel, and primrose willow,
Vines include muscadine grape vine, love vine, cat brier, and Old World climbing fern.
Freshwater Marsh (FLUCCS Code 641)
These communities occur as isolated wetlands throughout the site, ranging in size from
one acre to 11 acres, Most of these communities contain smartweed (Polygonum spp,) ,
maidencane, pickerelweed, camphor weed (Pluchea spp,), marsh pennywort, and
Asiatic coinwort, Larger marshes may also include arrow head, St. John's wort
(Hypericum spp,), rush fuirena (Fuirena scirpoidea), and climbing hempweed (Mikania
scandens), and may be heavily invaded by common primrose willow,
Freshwater Marsh, Primrose Willow Predominant (FLUCCS Code 6419)
These areas occur on the eastern portion of the site, and are associated with willow,
Primrose willow comprises more than 50 percent of the groundcover, and may exceed
90 percent coverage,
Freshwater Marsh, disturbed (FLUCCS Code 6410)
This small (1,5 acre) area occurs within a mixed rangeland (FLUCCS 330) community,
and was created as the result of a shallow borrow pit. The vegetation consist primarily of
torpedo grass, an exotic invasive species,
Freshwater Marsh. 25-49% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 641E2)
A one-acre area of this community occurs within an isolated cypress dome on the south
of the property, The marsh vegetation includes maidencane, pickerel weed, alligator flag
(Thalia geniculata), with primrose willow, Brazilian pepper comprises approximately one-
third of the plant cover.
Freshwater Marsh, 50-75% exotic cover (FLUCCS Code 641E3)
This community is located within the same general area, and possesses similar
vegetation as the 641 E2 community described above, but with Brazilian pepper cover
exceeding 50 percent.
Wet Prairie (FLUCCS Code 643)
This classification is composed of dominantly grassy vegetation within current or former
pasture areas, The predominant groundcover consists of torpedo grass, frog fruit (Phyla
nodiflora), bahiagrass, smartweed, marsh pennywort, Asiatic coinwort, and other plants
transitional between upland herbaceous systems and freshwater marsh vegetation,
7f23J20Q04.- 135526 Ver; 011. MPERRY
0-
OJ786"Ol3-00Q-PDRI-28423
12-8
Be
",-.'.'
Wet Prairie. disturbed (FLUCCS Code 643D)
These areas occur mainly on the western portions of the site, where land was formerly
maintained (roller-chopped, mowed, etc,) for use as unimproved pasture, The hydrology of
much of this area was made artificially wet due to influxes of agricultural stormwater,
producing an odd assemblage of plant species, Gallberry, saltbush and wax myrtle occur
as scattered shrubs, Groundcover includes upland species such as saw palmetto,
highbush blueberry, and pawpaw (Asimina tri/oba), Other species include bushy bluestem,
flat sedge, Caesar-weed, Asiatic coinwort, swamp fern, and primrose willow,
Disturbed Land (FLUCCS Code 740)
This category is reserved for predominantly barren land that has resulted from
earthmoving activities such as canal maintenance, berm construction, etc, Scattered
ruderal species may be found within these small areas,
Roads and Hiohwavs, Graded and Drained (FLUCCS Code 8145)
This category is reserved for the main farm haul road and its major tributaries,
Preserved Vegetation Associations
Agricultural land uses, invasive exotic monocultures, and infrastructure account for
approximately 92 percent of the total site acreage, The remaining eight percent constitutes
"native vegetation," which is generally scattered, isolated, and heavily impacted by past and
present agricultural activities, The low proportion of native vegetation and wetlands on-site
was a major determinant in site selection, and overall project impacts to native vegetation
were therefore limited primarily via avoidance,
Preservation and enhancement of 62 acres of native wetland vegetation are currently
incorporated into the master plan (see Wetland Preserve designations on Map H), These
areas are severely degraded by historic clear-cutting and pasture management, and now
exist as exotic monocultures (Brazilian pepper), A remnant cypress dome occurs in one
preserve, while small areas of hydric pine f1atwood and willow marsh occur in the other
preserve, As currently envisioned, these areas will be restored as freshwater marshes that
will be integrated into the surface water management lake system, These restored marshes
will provide high-quality habitat for wading birds and other wetland-dependent species, and
will enhance post-development water quality,
In addition to on-site preserves, wetland impact mitigation will be achieved largely or
entirely (per the ERP mitigation process) by enhancing portions of the large contiguous
native vegetation communities that occur outside of the western boundary of the Town,
These large systems, comprising the eastern border of the Camp Keais Strand, are
degraded due to invasive exotic species and pioneer plant species that exploit the "edge
effecf adjacent to agricultural fields, Enhancements to these large contiguous systems
produces a greater net environmental benefit than the preservation of small, widely
scattered, severely degraded native vegetation communities on-site that are currently
surrounded by agricultural fields and will eventually be surrounded by development in post-
construction, The prioritization, extent, and nature of wetland enhancements within these
larger offsite systems will be determined in consultation with SFWMD and FWC,
7'2312D04-13~52& Ver: 01!- MPERRY
-
03786-013-DOO-PDRI-28423
12-9
Be
As mentioned repeatedly throughout this document, this project is within the Collier
County's Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) overlay, In essence, project entitlement
occurs through the relinquishing of specified land uses on environmentally sensitive lands
within the RLSA, in exchange for directing compact forms of rural development onto lands
with low environmental value, Project impacts are therefore concentrated where they have
the least environmental impact, as is the case with the Town of Ave Maria, Environmentally
sensitive lands are protected as large contiguous blocks native vegetation and/or a
landscape matrix of native vegetation and agricultural land uses,
B. Discuss what survey methods were used to detennine the absence or presence of
state or federally listed wildlife and plants. (Sampling methodology should be
agreed to by the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at
preapplication conference stage.) State actual sampling times and dates, and
discuss any factors that may have influenced the results of the sampling effort.
Show on Map G the location of all transects, trap grids, or other sampling stations
used to detennine the on-site status of state or federally listed wildlife and plant
resources.
WilsonMiller conducted a comprehensive biological survey of the Town site, using field
methodologies that were consistent with those prescribed by the 1988 FGFWFC
publication Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.0 of the Application for
Development Approval (FGFWFC, 1988), The surveys also employed the" Standardized
State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects," a more recent
standardized survey methodology for southwest Florida (J, Beever III, Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission-FWC, 2002), Listed plant and wildlife species were
considered to be those species documented within the FWC publication Florida's
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Species of Special Concern: Official Lists
(FWC, 1997; 2004),
Prior to the listed species field investigations, color aerials and field-verified FLUCCS maps
were reviewed to identify the various vegetation communities present on-site, Based on
the vegetative habitat types identified, agency contacts, the FWS listed species information,
a literature search, FWC GIS database information, and Florida Natural Areas Inventory
(FNAI) GIS database information, a preliminary list of potential listed flora and fauna that
could be present on-site was determined. Refer to the attached species occurrence record
from FNAI, RCW, and FWS,
The field surveys consisted of pedestrian, vehicular, and/or all-terrain vehicle (ATV)
transects through the various habitats or vegetation associations, Refer to Map G for
transect locations, The choice of transect method was dictated by the land cover (e.g" row
crop, pasture, wetland forest, etc,) and the objective of a given survey (general survey
versus a species-specific survey). The surveys provided direct visual inspection of the vast
majority of the Town site, owing to the agricultural character of the property, the generally
wide field of vision, and the ease of traversing the JDIiitl'8Ky small extent of natural
vegetation on and adjacent to the site,
The surveys were conducted at various times on any given day, Surveys were conducted
such that observations included time periods ranging from one-half hour before sunrise to
one-half hour past sunset. Barring seasonal considerations, the survey dates allowed for
observations during likely times of probable occurrence for the majority of the listed wildlife
species which could occur on-site, During the survey, temperatures ranged from the mid
7/2312004- 135526 Ver; 01!- MPERRY
-
0378&-013.000-PORI.28423
12-10
Be
-
60s to the low 80s (degrees Fahrenheit) and conditions ranged from clear to overcast and
mostly calm winds, The weather conditions on survey days were therefore suitable for
wildlife observations,
The following provides a brief overview of how the methodologies employed during the
surveys deviated from the specific subcategories of wildlife survey methods recommended
in the referenced FWC document.
'Wetland Survevs" - Methods used were consistent except that surveys addressed more
species than those listed in the 1988 FWC publication,
"Upland Survevs" - Methods used were consistent except that in the majority of cases, the
density oftransects occupied exceeded the FWC recommended density,
"Small Mammal Samplinq" - No small mammal trapping was performed, None ofthe
species listed under this methodology could be reasonably expected to occur on the
property due to inappropriate range and habitat.
"Herpetofaunal Survevs" - No herpetofaunal trapping was performed, Eastem indigo snake
is the only listed species that could be reasonably expected to occur on the property,
"Gopher Tortoise Burrow Survevs" - Despite intensive searches for gopher tortoise
burrows within appropriate habitats, none were observed,
Species-specific surveys were dictated by on site habitats, FWC guidelines, and field
observations, Four species ultimately were the subject of specific surveys: burrowing owl
(Speotyto cunicularia), Florida sandhill crane (Grus Canadensis pratensis), Southeastern
American kestrel (Falco spaNerius paulus), and Audubon's crested caracara (Polyborus
plancus audubonii or Caracara cheriway),
Table 12.8-1 provides details on the dates, times, and personnel associated with the listed
species surveys, Approximately 562 person-hours were dedicated to the surveys,
Table 12.8-1
Listed Species Survey Details for the Town
BJ 2/412003 9:30 am 4:30 m 7
TT 2/412003 9:30 am 4:30 m 7
BJ 2/512003 10:00 am 3:00 m 5
TT 2/5/2003 10:00 am - 3:00 m 5
BJ 2/11/2003 9:00 am 5:00 m 8
TT 2/11/2003 9:00 am 5:00 8
BJ 2/24/2003 10:45am-5:10 m 6,5
TT 2/24/2003 10:45 am 5:10 m 6,5
BJ 3/5/2003 7;30 am 6:30 m 11
TT 3/512003 7:30 am 6:30 m 11
BJ 3/6/2003 8:00 am - 5:30 m 9.5
TT 3/6/2003 8:00 am - 5:30 m 9,5
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 01!_ MPERRY
~~
03786-013-000-PDRI_2B423
12-11
BJ 3f7/2003 10:ooam-4:15om 6.25
TT 317/2003 10:00am-4:150m 6,25
BJ 3/19/2003 7:00 am - 3:30 om 8.5
TT 3/19/2003 7:00 am - 3:30 om 8,5
JH 3/2012003 9:30 am - 3:30 om 6
TT 3/20/2003 9:30 am - 3:30 om 6
TT 3/21/2003 12:00 om - 3:30 om 3.5
BJ 3/2612003 8:30 am - 4:00 om 7.5
TT 3/26/2003 8:30 am - 4:00 om 7.5
BJ 3/27/2003 10:30 am - 3:40 om 5,25
TT 3/27/2003 10:30 am - 3:40 om 5.25
TT 3/28/2003 11:50am-3:500m 4
BJ 4/1/2003 10:00 am - 3:30 om 5,5
TT 4/1/2003 10:00 am-3:30 om 5.5
BJ 4/11/2003 11:30am-4:00nm 4.5
TT 4/11/2003 11:30 am-4:00 om 4,5
BJ 4/2212003 11:00am-4:00 om 5
TT 4/22/2003 11:00 am-4:00 nm 5
BJ 4/24/2003 9:30 am - 5:00 om 7,5
TT 4/24/2003 9:30 am - 5:00 nm 7.5
TT 5/6/2003 12:00 om-4:00 om 4.0
TT 5/8/2003 10:00am-4:00om 6
BJ 5/1312003 10:30 am - 4:00 om 5,5
TT 5/13/2003 10:30 am-4:00 om 5,5
BJ 5/1612003 11:00 am-4:oo om 5
TT 5/1612003 11:00 am-4:00 nm 5
TT 5/20/2003 9:15 am - 4:00 om 6.75
TT 5/29/2003 10:00 am - 4:00 om 6
BJ 6/1612003 10:00 am-4:00 om 6
TT 6/16/2003 10:00 am-4:00 om 6
BJ 6/25/2003 10:30 am - 3:00 om 4.5
TT 6/25/2003 10:30 am - 3:00 nm 4.5
BJ 6/27/2003 9:00am-ll:300m 2,5
TT 6/27/2003 9:00 am-11:30 om 2.5
BJ 717/2003 9:15 am-6:30 om 9,25
BL 717/2003 9:15 am-6:30 nm 9.25
JS 7f7/2003 9:15 am-6:30 nm 9,25
TT 7f7/2003 9:15 am-6:30 om 9,25
JS 817/2003 9:00 am - 1 :00 om 4
TT 817/2003 9:00 am - 1 :00 nm 4
BL 8/12/2003 4:00 nm - 7:30 nm 3.5
JS 8/12/2003 4:00 om - 7:30 om 3.5
JH 8/1812003 2:45 om - 7:30 om 4,75
JS 8/1812003 2:45 om - 7:30 om 4.75
JH 8/1912003 3:00 om - 6:30 om 3,5
7/23/2004- 135526 Ver: ntl_ MPERRY
,~
037ll6-013-00o-PDRI-28423
12-12
,
I'
Be
Be
JS 8/19/2003 3.5
JS 8/2012003 7:00 am - 1 :30 6.5
TT 8/20/2003 7:00 am - 1 :30 6.5
JH 8/21/2003 5:30 am - 3:00 m 9.5
JS 8/21/2003 5:30 am - 3:00 m 9.5
JH 8/22/2003 5:30 am -1:30 m 8
JS 8/22/2003 5:30 am -1 :30 8
BL 8/25/2003 6:45 am - 10:00 am 3,25
BL 8/27/2003 7:00 am -12:00 m 5
JS 8/29/2003 9:30 am -12:30 m 3
JS 9/4/2003 2:15 -5:15 m 3
BJ 12/22/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6,5
BL 12/22/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
JH 12/22/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 6.5
JS 12/22/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
TT 12/22/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
BJ 12/23/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6,5
BL 12/23/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 6.5
TT 12/23/2003 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
TT 2/3/2004 9:00 am - 3:30 m 6.5
BL 2/4/2004 7:00am - 2:00 m 7
JS 2/5/2004 9:30 am - 4:00 m 6.5
CS 2/17/2004 9:30 am - 5:30 m 8,5
BL 2/18/2004 8:00 am - 3:00 7
CS 2/19/2004 9:30 am - 5:00 m 7.5
JS 3/16/2004 9:00 am - 5:00 m 8
CS 3/1712004 8:30 am - 5:00 m 8,5
CS 3/1812004 8:30 am - 5:00 m 8.5
JH 3/31/2004 9:30 am - 4:45 m 7,25
JS 3/31/2004 9:30 am - 4:45 m 7,25
JH 4/112004 9:30 am-4:15 m 6,75
JS 4/1/2004 9:30 am-4:15 m 6.75
otal Surve Hours 562.0
Personnel key: TT(Tom Trettis); JS (Justin Styer); CS (Craig Schmittler); Bl (Bruce Layman); JH (Jennifer Hecker);
BJ (Bruce Johnson)
C. List all state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources that were observed on the
site and show location on Map G. Given the plant communities on-site, list any
additional state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources expected to occur on
the site and show the location of suitable habitat on Map G. Additionally, address
any unique wildlife and plant resources, such as colonial bird nesting sites and
migrating bird concentration areas. For species that are either observed or expected
to utilize the site, discuss the known or expected location and population size on-
site, existence (and extent, if known> of adjacent, contiguous habitat off-site, and any
special habitat requirements of the species.
71231200-4-135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
0-
03786-C113--000-PDRI-28423
12-13
Be
Listed plant species observed on site are summarized in Table 12.C-1, In addition to these
observed species, there is the potential for butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis) to occur
within wetland habitats containing cypress,
Table 12.C-1
Listed Plant Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary
Tillandsia balbisiana
Tillandsia ruinosa
Tillandsia fasciculata
Acrostichum spp,
Tillandsia utriculata
411,434,625,630
621,624,625,630
621,624,630
617,621,630
621,624,630
FDA =
FWS =
E =
T =
C =
NL =
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered
Threatened
Commercially Exploited
Not listed
T
E
E
E arC
E
Listed wildlife species that were observed on site are summarized in Table 12.C-2, The
only nesting activity noted on site involved the caracaras, which nested and bred
successfully in the very northeast corner of the site, Listed wildlife species that were not
observed on site, but have some potential to occur, are provided in Table 12.C-3,
Table 12.C-2
Listed Wildlife Species Observed within the Town of Ave Maria Boundary
FWC
FWS =
T =
NL =
SSC =
E =
712312004- 135526 Vel' 01t_ MPERRY
,~~
03786-013.(JOo-PDRf.28423
Florida sandhill crane
Wood stork.
Urn kin
Audubon's crested caracara
Tricolor heron
Little blue heron
Sno e ret
White ibis
Roseate S oonbill
Burrowin owl
211,212,310,641,643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
211,212,310
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
512,621,641,643
211,212,310,329,330
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
United Stales Fish & Wildlife Service
Threatened
Not listed
Species of Special Concern
Endangered
12-14
sse
sse
sse
sse
sse
sse
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
, 8e
Table 12.C-3
Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur On Site But Were Not Observed.
211,212,214
411
411 416,625
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
*Go herus
Drymarchon cou
Low
Low
FWC =
FWS =
E =
T =
SSC =
NL =
Habitat =
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Endangered
Threatened
Species of Special Concern
Not Listed
Major FLUCCS categories in which indicated species are potentially most likely to occur.
D. Indicate what impact development of the site will pose to affected state or federally
listed wildlife and plant resources.
The listed plant species indicated in Table 12.C-1 are routinely found in the large,
contiguous native vegetation communities that occur on the western border of the Town, In
contrast, occurrence of these species within the project site are sporadic, particularly
because the on-site vegetation has been heavily impacted by prior disturbance, invasive
exotic species infestations, and altered hydroperiods, Mitigation (wetlandlhabitat
enhancement) for on-site wetland impacts is planned to occur within the large systems just
outside (west) of the property, and will maintain suitable environments for these plants to
thrive,
The species named in Table 12.C-2 opportunistically utilize the active agricultural areas on
the Town site for foraging, and similar habitats are widespread throughout eastern Collier
County, As mentioned in the response to Question 10.4,A, the RLSA entitlement program
results in protection for large areas of native vegetation and agriculture, These mixed
landscapes, protected from development and conditional uses via the RLSA program,
provide long-term conservation of habitats that support these species,
E. Discuss what measures are proposed to be taken to mitigate impacts to state and
federally listed wildlife and plant resources. If protection is proposed to occur on-
site, describe what legal instrument will be used to protect the site, and what
management actions will be taken to maintain habitat value. If protection is
proposed to occur off-site, identify the proposed amount and type of lands to be
mitigated as well as whether mitigation would be through a regional mitigation land
bank, by acquisition of lands that adjoin existing public holdings, or by other means.
712312004.135526 Ver: 01!. MPERRY
,,~
03786.Ql3-000-PDRI-28423
12-15
l'
Be
Habitat protection for listed plant and wildlife species will occur on approximately 20,000
acres of land, as part of the RLSA development entitlement process, These lands are
dedicated by legal easement agreements to Collier County and the state of Florida, and
occur within or adjoining regionally significant resources such as Camp Keais Strand, the
Okaloacoochee Slough, and the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, Since the
impacts are occurring primarily on agricultural lands with low environmental value, the lands
protected under the RLSA program obviate the need for standard mitigation practices,
REFERENCES
Beever III, JW, 2002, Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD
ERP Projects, Second edition, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Office
of Environmental Services, Punta Gorda, Florida, 44 pp,
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation), 1999, Florida land use, cover and forms
classification Should you have any questions, please contact me, stem, Third edition,
Tallahassee, Florida,
FGFWFC (Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission), 1988. Wildlife Methodology
Guidelines for Section 18.0 of the Application for Development Approval, Office of
Environmental Services, Tallahassee, Florida, 14 pp,
FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), 1997, Florida's endangered
species, threatened species, and species of special concern: official lists. Tallahassee,
Florida,
FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), 2004, Florida's endangered
species, threatened species, and species of special concem: official lists. Tallahassee,
Florida, 10 pp, Available online at: http://wildflorida,oro/imperiled/pdo/Endanoered-
Threatened-Special-Concern-2004, pdf (last accessed 7/10104),
7123/201).4...135526 Vow 011- MPERRY
,-
03786-<l13-00Cl-PDRI_2l1-423
12-16
Be
QUESTION 13 - WETLANDS
A. If there are wetlands on the site, discuss and specify the following:
1. Acreage and percentage of property which is currently wetlands. These
wetlands should be shown on Map F, Vegetation Associations and identified
by individual reference numbers. (These numbers should be utilized in
responding to the other sub-questions.)
SFWMD has field reviewed jurisdictional wetland delineations on the northern half of the
Town, and has exerted jurisdiction over 359,1 acres of wetlands. Within the southern
portion of the Town, we anticipate that an estimated 80,1 acres will be declared as
jurisdictional wetlands by SFWMD, Therefore, the total acreage of SFWMD jurisdictional
wetlands present on site is estimated to be 439.2 acres, or 8,8 percent of the site, SFWMD
"Other Surface Water" (OSW) features (large agricultural canals) comprise 25.4 acres,
Based upon these wetland and OSW acreages, uplands therefore account for
approximately 91 percent of the Town area,
Individual wetlands within the project site were numbered sequentially, and are listed in
Table 13.A-1 with their corresponding acreages, Vegetation associations for each of the
wetlands may be readily determined by comparing Map F-1 (FLUCCS) and Map F-2
(Wetlands),
2. Historic hydroperiods and seasonal water elevations of on-site wetlands.
All of the wetland areas on-site exhibit a severely altered hydrologic regime due to
permitted agricultural water management practices, where excess water during the rainy
season is pumped into wetland areas or simply held in storage, The existing agricultural
operations on-site utilize a complex system of berms, ditches, canals (major water
conveyances), and pumps to provide irrigation and drainage, The agricultural water
management system heavily influences natural sheetflow and shallow water-table aquifer
dynamics, generally increasing the magnitude and rate of water level fluctuations on a
daily and seasonal basis, The net effect of the water management activities is to produce
extreme variations in wetland hydroperiod as compared to natural hydroperiod
fluctuations,
Evidence for these extreme hydroperiod variations includes direct visual observation of
water-level fluctuations over time; extensive encroachment of upland plants into wetland
areas; indicators of plant stress in both wetland and upland species (drought responses,
chlorosis, necrosis due to submergence, etc,); and seasonal die-offs of upland
vegetation in the wet season and wetland vegetation in the dry season. The present
hydroperiods within these wetlands are inadequate to support healthy wetland
vegetation communities, and are so altered that they are difficult to characterize,
Within the wetlands on the project site, none of the standard hydrobiological indicators
(drift lines, adventitious roots, moss collars, water staining, etc,) provided consistent data
for determining average wet season or seasonal high water (SHW) levels. In many cases,
hydrobiological indicators were not present. In other cases, the indicators were too
variable to determine a single water level, even within short distances, Therefore, no
average wet season or seasonal high water data are currently available,
7/231200.4- 135526 Ver: 011- MPERRY
~
03786-013-llOO-PDRI-26423
13-1
Be
,~
Table 13.A-1
SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland Acreages
SFWMD Wetland # Wetland Acreage
1 2,2
2 1,8
3 13,2
4 28.7
5 2,8
6 2,2
7 6,1
8 3,0
9 0.8
10 67,6
11 7.1
12 0.4
13 0,9
14 0,9
15 0.9
16 14,5
17 5.5
18 40,8
19 3,6
20 0.4
21 6,5
22 31,0
23 16.7
24 10,4
25 43.0
26 11.9
27 0,9
28 0,3
29 3,9
30 4,3
31 25.4
32 1,6
33 62,8
34 3,9
35 3,6
36 3,3
37 4,0
38 2,6
TOTALS 439.2
3. Acreage and location of wetlands which are to be preserved in their natural or
existing state, including proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations
and methods for preservation.
Due to the generally low quality of on-site wetlands, preservation of many wetland areas in
their existing state is not ecologically effective, The high levels of invasive exotic infestation
712312004-1$5526 Ve~ 011- MPERRY
,-
037l16-013-l.100-PDRI-28423
13-2
Be
in the on site wetlands, often combined with dense growth of nuisance species such as
primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), would essentially require an enormous sustained
effort to achieve wetland restoration success criteria, Even if success were achieved, the
on-site wetlands would be surrounded by development, limiting their habitat value to
wetland-dependent species, The site design deliberately avoided impacting the large
contiguous wetlands present within the project vicinity, as their value to listed species and
water quality is much greater than the on-site wetlands,
Approximately 62 acres of wetland preserve are incorporated into the master plan, Details
on proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations, and methods for preservation are
being developed in close coordination with SFWMD during the ERP permitting process,
4. Acreage and location of areas to be enhanced, including proposed
hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations and methods of enhancement
Approximately 48 acres within and surrounding Wetland #25, and 14 acres within Wetland
#33, will be restored and preserved in post-development.
5. Actions taken to minimize or mitigate impacts on wetland areas, including
maintaining the hydroperiod and providing buffers.
The site selection process achieved the broad goal of identifying project lands that
generally avoided wetland impacts, The effect of this site selection on overall wetland
impacts cannot be overstated, as there are few 5000-acre areas in southwest Florida that
have such a low proportion of on-site wetlands (8,8 percent) as this site, A review of the
Town of Ave Maria aerial imagery (Map B) illustrates that the project boundary was
delineated in a manner that deliberately avoided the large wetland systems present in the
project vicinity, The proposed main entrance road coincides with an existing agricultural
haul road, and surface water management lakes on the project periphery do not encroach
into wetland areas,
As noted, wetland impacts are proposed for systems that are already heavily impacted, by
invasive exotic infestation and/or secondary hydrologic impacts due to agriculture, To put
these impacts into perspective, consider that approximately 120 acres of proposed
wetland impacts in the northeastern portion of the site occur in wet improved pasture that
is dominated by torpedo grass (>75 percent cover), Another 91 acres of on-site wetlands
consist of Brazilian pepper monocultures that have minimal ecological value, Together,
these areas alone account for nearly half of all on-site wetlands, and more than half of the
total proposed wetland impact acreage,
As mitigation for the proposed impacts to these low-quality, fragmented wetlands, the
applicant proposes to enhance/restore portions of the large contiguous wetland systems
just outside the western property boundary, The hydroperiods of these systems are
relatively robust and are ultimately controlled by the regional hydrology of Camp Keais
Strand, and thus more or less dependent upon natural hydrologic factors,
This mitigation will ultimately provide a far greater ecological benefit to the local and
regional environment than the preservation of the scattered, low-value on-site wetlands,
Additionally, it should be noted that the SSAs that were protected to entitle the Project
contain thousands of acres of wetlands that are no longer subjected to development
7/2312004- 135526 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~
03786-013--0OQ-PDRI-28423
13-3
Be
pressures (Le" development rights were or will be removed), and the RLSA program itself
effectively results in a cap on cumulative impacts within eastern Collier County,
Buffers for preserved and/or enhanced wetlands will adhere to ERP wetland buffer
requirements, Local land development code regulations within the RLSA require a 300-
foot open space buffer between Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs) and developed
areas, if the f10wway is not already buffered by a Habitat Stewardship Area (HSA) or
agricultural Water Retention Area 0fJRA), The code also requires that no turf ground cover
may occur within the first 200 feet of the buffer, eliminating golf fairways/greens and
promoting native vegetation plantings or enhancements adjacent to offsite flow ways,
6. Acreage and location of wetlands which will be disturbed or altered, including
a discussion of the specific alterations and disturbances.
Based upon the estimated jurisdictional wetland acreage and the master plan, a total of
approximately 377 acres of wetland will be either filled for development or excavated for
surface water management lakes, More than half of the impact acreage occurs within wet
pastures dominated by torpedo grass, and wetlands containing Brazilian pepper
monocultures, Portions of wetland #25 and wetland #33 will be retained and enhanced,
7. Precautions to be taken during construction to protect wetland areas.
Prior to commencement of construction, the limits of wetland preserves in #25 and #33 will
be staked and roped to prevent encroachment by construction activities, In addition, best
management practices for erosion control will be implemented during construction of the
project, Prior to commencement of construction, erosion control devices will be installed
where appropriate to control and reduce soil erosion, sediment transport, and turbidity,
Such devices, which include haybale barriers, silt fencing, sediment booms, and temporary
sediment traps, will remain in place throughout the duration of construction until
construction zones and surrounding areas are stabilized,
8. If available, provide jurisdictional detenninations.
Map F-2, the SFWMD Wetlands Map, indicates verified and pending SFWMD Jurisdictional
Wetland Determinations,
B. Provide any proposed plans (conceptual or specific) for created or enhanced
wetland areas, including littoral lake slopes, buffers, vegetative species to be
planted, etc.
The master plan has not been finalized to the degree where detailed proposed plans for
wetland enhancement/creation are available, The specific information sought by this
question will be developed and reported through close cooperation with SFWMD and FWC
during the ERP permitting process,
7/2312Ol)(.. 135526 Ve" 011- MPERRY
c_
03786-1113-000-PDRI-28423
13-4
Be
QUESTION 14 - WATER
A. Describe the existing hydrologic conditions (both ground and surface water) on and
abutting the site, including identification and discussion of any potential aquifer
recharge areas. Please identify and describe any outstanding Florida Waters, Wild
and Scenic Rivers, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or II Waters that
occur within, abutting or downstream of the site.
The Town of Ave Maria is located on land that includes farm fields currently permitted for
irrigation water use, The existing agricultural operations are permitted to withdraw from
the water table and Lower Tamiami aquifers, Proposed withdrawals for potable supply
and irrigation use will be less than the agricultural withdrawals currently permitted at the
site, Ave Maria will utilize the Lower Tamiami aquifer for potable uses and will utilize
reclaimed water and the Lower Tamiami aquifer for irrigation uses,
The geology and hydrology of Collier County has been described in reports by the
Florida Geologic Survey (McCoy, 1962; Klein, 1972; Campbell, 1988), the South Florida
Water Management District (Peacock, 1983; Knapp et ai, 1986), and by various authors
and consultants (Missimer & Associates, 1983a, 1983b, 1986, 1988, and 1990), A
partial bibliography is given at the end of this section (Question 14), Pertinent
information on the regional geology and hydrology are presented herein to provide a
framework for understanding the local hydrologic conditions and factors influencing
them, The stratigraphic terminology used conforms to that presented in the Florida
Geological Survey (FGS) Special Publication 28 and Bulletin 59 (Scott, 1988),
The Town is located directly south of the area of southwest Florida generally known as
the Immokalee Rise, The rise is a plateau of land that lies predominantly in Hendry
County but extends into eastern Lee County and northeastern Collier County with a
range of elevations from approximately 25 to 40 feet above National Geodedic Vertical
Datum (NGVD) dipping gently to the southwest (Campbell, 1988), Most of western
Collier County has elevations ranging from 0 to 15 feet NGVD, The slope from the
coastal areas of western Collier County to the rise is approximately one foot per mile,
East of Immokalee is an area known as the Big Cypress Spur, which is a transition area
between the Immokalee Rise and the Everglades, Elevations in the Spur are slightly
higher than Western Collier and the Everglades but lower than the Immokalee Rise, The
study area represents a source of recharge for both the urban areas of Collier County
(western Collier County) and the Big Cypress Spur. A map of the topography in the
vicinity of the Town is presented as Figure 14A-1,
GEOLOGY
Southwest Florida is underlain by nearly 18,000 feet of sedimentary rocks, Freshwater
occurs only within the upper few hundred feet of this sequence, and hence, a more
detailed description of both the geology and the aquifer systems of this interval is
provided, A general description of the deeper geology to approximately 3,000 feet below
land surface is also provided, In Collier County the deeper brackish aquifers are used
as reverse osmosis plant feedwater sources and for underground storage of fresh water.
In addition, the deeper saline water formations are used as injection zones for the
disposal of treated wastewater and membrane water treatment plant concentrate, A
generalized hydrostratigraphic column of the sediments underlying the project site is
provided as Figure 14A-2,
7/2312004-135531 Ver: 011- MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-1
Be
A description of the geologic formations and aquifers that occur in the vicinity of the
project site is provided below, The geologic and hydrogeologic units are described from
youngest to oldest. Geologist logs for selected wells in the vicinity of the Town are
attached as Tables 14A-1 through 14A - 3,
Pamlico Sand
The uppermost and youngest formation encountered in Collier County is the Pamlico
Sand. The Pamlico Sand is Late Pleistocene in age and is present at the surface
throughout much of South Florida, At the Town site this unit ranges in thickness from
about 6 to 20 feet. The Pamlico Sand consists predominantly of fine to medium-grained
quartz sand, with lesser amounts of shell, detrital clays and organic constituents, Shell
fragments (mostly bivalves) and organic fragments (fossil roots) are commonly present.
The permeability of the Pamlico Sand is generally medium to low (10 to 100 ftIday)
depending on the quantity of secondary constituents,
Ft. ThomosonfTamiami Formation
The Pamlico Sand is underlain by the Pleistocene age Fort Thompson Formation and
the Pliocene age Tamiami Formation, The lithology of the Fort Thompson Formation is
highly variable and includes fresh-water, marine, and brackish water limestones, marls,
sands, and shells, The Pliocene-aged Tamiami Formation, which unconformably lies
below the Fort Thompson Formation, is also lithologically highly variable, At least nine
mappable members or facies have been identified in the Tamiami Formation in
southwestern Florida, and includes such diverse lithologies as marls, sands and
sandstones, dolosilt, and limestone (Missimer, 1992), Differentiation of the various
members and facies of the Fort Thompson Formation and Tamiami Formation is not
always readily apparent using well cuttings descriptions,
The limestone and marl present between approximately 6 and 80 feet at the Town site
are assigned to the Tamiami Formation, In central Collier County, the Tamiami
Formation consists of three distinct mappable units, These members in order of
increasing depth are the Pinecrest Limestone, the Bonita Springs Marl, and the Ochopee
Limestone, The Bonita Springs Marl, which consists of a green to gray carbonate mud,
forms a confining unit separating the two permeable limestone units, The Bonita Springs
Marl thins out or is absent in southern Collier County and in certain areas of northern
Collier County, At the Town site, an olive gray clay to light gray carbonate mud or marl
beds, which occur in the depth interval typically from approximately 25 to 37 feet are
assigned to the Bonita Spring Marl Member of the Tamiami Formation,
The Ochopee Limestone member comprises most of the Tamiami Formation at the
Town project site. The Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation was
named by Mansfield (1939) for the light gray to white sandy fossiliferous limestone that
crops out near the town of Ochopee in Collier County (Hunter, 1968), According to
Hunter (1968), the Ochopee Member typically is light gray to white calcarenite that has
an extensive development of secondary porosity formed by the dissolution of the
aragonitic shells of mollusks, Well-preserved pectens, oysters, barnacles, and echinoids
are also present. The large interconnected molds give the unit a very high permeability,
712312004- 135531 VOL 01!- MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-2
Be
The Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation is present from
approximately 60 ft below land surface (bls) to more than 80 ft bls at the project site,
Hawthorn Group
The Hawthorn Group underlies the Tamiami Formation unconformably, and is a
lithologically complex sequence of phosphate bearing sediments, The Miocene age
Hawthorn Group is comprised of an upper, primarily siliciclastic unit (Peace River
Formation), and a lower, primarily carbonate unit (Arcadia Formation), The two
formations are separated by a major regional disconformity,
The Peace River Formation of the Hawthorn Group consists of sandstones, sands,
dolomitic clays or dolosilt, and fossil shell material. The formation occurs from 80 to
approximately 300 feet below land surface, Stratigraphically, the uppermost member of
the Peace River Formation is the Lehigh Acres Sandstone, The unit is a light gray to tan
sandstone that is interbedded with fine-grained, quartz sand and abundant shells and
phosphate. Commonly, the percentage of unconsolidated sand increases with depth,
The contact with the overlying Ochopee Limestone appears to be gradational at the
project site, The Peace River Formation serves as a confining unit which separates the
SurficialfTamiami aquifer from the underlying Intermediate Aquifer System, The total
thickness of the formation at the project site is estimated to be about 200 feet.
The Arcadia Formation of the Hawthorn Group is composed of limestones with
interbedded marls, and dolosilts, The top of the formation is anticipated to occur at
approximately 300 feet at the project site, The limestones are light to yellowish gray
micrites and biomicrites with moderate to good porosity, Water bearing zones in the
limestones having moderate to good porosity comprise the Intermediate Aquifer System
at the site, Phosphate is a common accessory mineral in the various lithology types
occurring in the Arcadia Formation, The base of the Arcadia Formation in Southwest
Florida can be identified by an abrupt decrease in phosphate content in lithologic
samples and an attenuation of gamma ray activity on geophysical logs, Based on
information obtained from nearby deep wells, the base of the Hawthorn Group is
anticipated to occur at about 700 feet below land surface at the project site,
Suwannee Limestone
Carbonate rock and sediments of the Oligocene age Suwannee Limestone underlie the
Hawthorn Group, This regional stratigraphic unit ranges between 350 and 450 feet in
thickness in Collier County, The lithologic character of the Suwannee Limestone is
significantly different as compared to the overlying phosphatic Hawthorn rock and
sediments, The Suwannee Limestone consists mainly of interbedded calcarenites
(grainstones) and other types of "clean" limestone, with only minor amounts of
phosphorite and clastic sediments,
Ocala Limestone
The Ocala Limestone, upper Eocene in age, disconformably underlies the rock and
sediments of the Suwannee Limestone, The Ocala Limestone can often be separated
into an upper and lower member, The upper member is a soft, white, chalky, porous
coquina consisting of specimens of larger foraminifera such as Lepidocyclina oca/ana,
The lower member is a light cream-colored limestone that is generally harder than the
7/23/2004- 135531 Vel:: 01)- MPERRY
03786-01J.-OOO--O
14-3
Be
upper member, and commonly contains molds of small millolids, Limited data available
on the Ocala Limestone in Collier County indicate that these late Eocene deposits are
between 300 and 400 feet thick in the area,
Avon Park Limestone
The Avon Park Limestone is predominantly a light brown to tan dolomite with
interbedded limestone, The Avon Park Limestone is middle Eocene in age, and
contains distinct and abundant microfossils, including Cosknoline floridina and
Dictyoconus cookei. The unit is thickest in southern Florida with between 400 and 600
feet of rock and sediments, Highly cavernous zones may exist in the lower Avon Park
dolomitic section,
Oldsmar Limestone
The Oldsmar Limestone is lithologically similar to the overlying Avon Park Limestone,
Delineation between the two formations is possible through identification of microfauna
occurring in the Oldsmar Limestone including, in descending abundance, Helicostegina
gyralis, Psedophragmina cedarkeysensis, and Coskinolina elongata, Gypsum and some
chert are also found in these lower Eocene age deposits, Large cavernous voids are
commonly encountered to produce a "boulder zone" with an extremely high
transmissivity. These rocks and sediments are approximately 1,200 feet thick beneath
Collier County, Depths to the high transmissivity zone may range from about 2,200 to
3,300 feet below surface, This zone is commonly utilized for the disposal of domestic
wastewater and membrane concentrate in South Florida,
Geologist's logs from wells MC-5001 and MC-5075 and a soil boring log of well B-327
are provided at the end of this discussion as Tables 14A-1 through 14A-3, Well MC-
5001 is located approximately 5 miles west of the project site, and well MC-5075 is
located approximately 1 mile northeast of the project site, The soil boring log is from a
well were drilled on the Ave Maria project site,
GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY
Three major aquifer systems are present in Collier County, They are, in descending
order, the Surficial Aquifer System, the Intermediate Aquifer System, and the Floridan
Aquifer System, The aquifer systems are typically well separated and pumpage from
one system usually does not significantly affect the others, The Sandstone aquifer,
which is described below, is considered part of the Intermediate Aquifer System,
However, in portions of Collier County, the Sandstone aquifer is hydraulically connected
to the Lower Tamiami and water-table aquifers, It has been suggested that the
Sandstone aquifer be moved into the Surficial Aquifer System (Missimer, Martin 2001),
For the purposes of this report, this aquifer will be described as part of the Intermediate
Aquifer System to coincide with current publications,
The aquifers within each system are separated by confining beds, which generally do
not provide complete hydraulic separation, but to varying degrees, allow water to leak
between the aquifers, The rate and direction at which leakage occurs depends on the
vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit and the potentiometric head
differential between the adjacent aquifers, both natural and pumping induced,
1123/2004- 135531 V""Ol!-MPERRY
03796-013-000-_0
14-4
Be
A schematic diagram showing the formations and lithologies present within each of the
aquifer systems is provided in Figure 14A - 2, Descriptions of the aquifer systems and
of the individual aquifers with the most water supply potential in each system are
provided below,
Surficial Aauifer Svstem I Water Table Aauifer
The Surficial Aquifer System is comprised of the water-table aquifer and Lower Tamiami
aquifer, The water-table aquifer in Collier County occurs within the Pleistocene-aged
Pamlico Sand, Fort Thompson Formation, and the unnamed limestone facies or the
Pinecrest Limestone member of the Pliocene-aged Tamiami Formation, The Pamlico
Sand consists primarily of medium to fine-grained quartz sand with varying amounts of
secondary constituents including shell, detrital clays, and organic material. Thickness of
the unit ranges from 0 to 15 feet in the study area, Permeability is generally medium to
low depending upon the quantity of secondary constituents (Missimer & Associates,
1986),
In areas where the Pamlico Sand is very thin or absent, a hard, sandy limestone or
calcareous sandstone is frequently encountered, These lithologies are characteristic of
the Fort Thompson Formation which also contains beds of quartz sand and thin beds of
dense, hard, freshwater limestone in some locations (Missimer & Associates, 1991),
The Lower Tamiami aquifer of the Surficial Aquifer System occurs within the upper part
of the Tamiami Formation in most of Collier County, The predominant lithology is a
sandy, highly fossiliferous limestone with varying quantities of mollusk shells, corals,
bryozoans, and barnacles, The limestone unit is characterized by abrupt changes in
thickness and often has a high permeability caused by the secondary dissolution of
aragonitic shell material. This secondary dissolution creates an abundance of mold and
cast type porosity, which greatly enhances the storage and flow of water. Thickness of
this limestone unit increases to the north and east in Collier County where it exceeds 60
feet in parts of northern Collier County, The overall thickness of the Surficial Aquifer
System generally ranges from 30 to 90 feet in northern Collier County. Low permeability
sediments consisting primarily of carbonate clays, fine sand, silt, and shell form the base
of the water-table aquifer in most of the study area, This unit thins and thickens
erratically and is absent in some areas (SFWMD 86-1), Where the confining unit is
absent, the water-table aquifer is in direct hydraulic connection with the Lower Tamiami
aquifer and both units are under unconfined conditions and should be termed the water-
table aquifer. In this case, the water-table aquifer can exceed 100 feet in thickness,
The hydraulic characteristics of the water-table aquifer vary considerably depending on
both thickness and lithologic character. A map showing the transmissivity of the water-
table aquifer is provided as Figure 14A - 3, This map was generated using data input
files from the SFWMD western Collier County groundwater flow model (April 1992), In
the northwestern portion of Collier County, where the limestone layers are thinner,
transmissivity values range from 50,000 gpdlft to 300,000 gpd/ft, In the southeastern
parts of the study area where thick, highly permeable, reefal limestones occur, aquifer
transmissivity values can exceed 1,000,000 gpd/ft (Missimer & Associates, 1986), The
porosities in the reefal limestone areas can exceed 50 percent with correspondingly high
specific yield values,
7/2312004- 135531 v.,,: 01!- MPERRY
03766-013-000--0
14-5
Be
By definition, the water-table aquifer is unconfined or in direct contact with atmospheric
pressure, However, the sediments in the upper part of the aquifer often have much
lower permeabilities than the underlying limestone units, which causes the aquifer to
respond to pumpage as a semi-unconfined unit in some locations (using the definitions
of Kruseman and DeRidder, 1991),
The primary source of recharge to the water-table aquifer is direct infiltration and
percolation of rainfall, Other minor sources include lateral inflow, percolation from septic
tanks and holding ponds, and infiltration from canals and lakes when their stages exceed
the altitude of the water table, Discharge from the water-table aquifer occurs by way of
evaporation, transpiration by plants, lateral flow into canals, lakes, and ultimately, the
Gulf of Mexico, leakage into underlying aquifers, and from the pumping of wells,
The highest water levels in the Northern Collier County occur where land surface
elevations are highest. Water levels generally decrease to the south and southwest
following the slope of the land (Figure 14A -1), Water levels in the aquifer vary on a
seasonal basis, During the summer rainy season, water levels often approach or
exceed land surface, The natural difference in wet season and dry season water levels
frequently exceeds 5 feet. Because the water-table aquifer is unconfined, it can be
directly affected by alterations in drainage,
Lower Tamiami Aquifer
A low permeability, sandy, sometimes shelly, carbonate clay commonly referred to as
the Bonita Springs Marl separates the water-table aquifer from the underlying Lower
Tamiami aquifer in northern Collier County, including the vicinity of the Ave Maria DR!.
The thickness of the confining beds ranges between 0 and 50 feet and averages
approximately 30 feet on the project site, Drawdown in the water-table due to pumpage
of the Lower Tamiami aquifer will be dampened or eliminated where suitable
confinement is present.
The Lower Tamiami aquifer occurs within the Ochopee member of the Tamiami
Formation. The Ochopee Member consists primarily of light gray to white, sandy,
fossiliferous limestones, The dissolution of shell material creates large interconnecting
shell molds that give the unit a high permeability, The thickness of the Ochopee ranges
between approximately 40 and 150 feet in northeastern Collier County,
The hydraulic characteristics of the Lower Tamiami aquifer are variable, Over 30 aquifer
performance tests have been conducted on the aquifer in Collier County by the SFWMD
and private consultants, Transmissivity values range from approximately 75,000 gpd/ft
in northwest Collier County to over 500,000 gpd/ft in the northeast. A contour map
showing the transmissivity of the Lower Tamami aquifer is included as Figure 14A - 5,
This map was generated using data input files from the SFWMD western Collier County
groundwater flow model (April 1992), The transmissivity increases greatly to the
southwest of the project site in Golden Gates Estates, The Lower Tamiami aquifer is
currently the primary source for public water supply, agricultural, and industrial supply in
Collier County,
The potentiometric surface of the Lower Tamami aquifer varies on a seasonal and
regional basis in Collier County, Water levels range from near land surface during the
wet season in undeveloped areas to 15 feet or more below land surface near centers of
7/23/2004- 135531 Var: 011- MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
14-6
Be
pumpage during the dry season, The regional flow direction is to the south and
southwest, generally perpendicular to the land surface contours. with hydraulic gradients
that approximately range from 0,25 to 1,25 feet per mile, Steeper hydraulic gradients
and radial flow conditions are encountered near large centers of pumpage such as
municipal or agricultural wellfields,
Recharge to the aquifer occurs primarily by downward leakage from the water-table
aquifer through the overlying semi-confining beds, The potentiometric surface of the
Lower Tamiami aquifer is generally lower than the surface of the water-table aquifer
except very near major surface drainage features or where the confinement is absent.
This results in continuous downward leakage from the water-table aquifer to the Lower
Tamiami aquifer, The amount of leakage depends upon the overall vertical hydraulic
conductivity of the confining unit and the magnitude of the difference in the
potentiometric levels of the aquifers. Therefore, recharge to the Lower Tamiami aquifer
is typically greatest near centers of pumpage from the aquifer. Discharge from the
Lower Tamiami aquifer occurs primarily from lateral flow to the Gulf of Mexico and from
the pumping of wells,
Intermediate AQuifer Svsteml Sandstone AQuifer
In the vicinity of the Town, the Lower Tamiami aquifer is often hydraulically connected to
the Sandstone aquifer, which is generally considered the uppermost hydrologic unit of
the Intermediate Aquifer System. The Sandstone aquifer consists of moderate to low
permeability calcareous cemented quartz sands, sandstone, and sandy limestone that
belong to the upper part of the Peace River Formation of the Hawthorn Group, The
aquifer is commonly used for agricultural irrigation in eastern Lee and Hendry Counties
(SFWMD, 1986), The transmissivity of the aquifer is generally high in the vicinity of the
Town as shown on Figure 14A - 6, This figure was generated using data obtained from
the SFWMD groundwater flow model of western Collier County (April 1992), The
potentiometric surface of the Sandstone aquifer is similar to that of the Lower Tamiami
aquifer because the two units are hydraulically connected, A confining unit separates
the aquifers in Lee and northwestern Collier County so that a difference in the
potentiometric surface exists between the aquifers in these areas,
The base of the Sandstone aquifer is marked by an abrupt lithologic transition to the
highly impermeable pale olive to greenish-gray clays and marls of the middle and lower
Peace River Formation, These sediments form the upper Hawthorn confining zone,
The upper Hawthorn confining unit ranges in thickness from approximately 100 to 150
feet in the county. The considerable thickness and low permeability of the clays and
marls result in good confinement between the Sandstone aquifer and the underlying
Hawthorn Zone I aquifer,
Hawthorn Zone I AQuifer
The Hawthorn Zone I aquifer occurs within permeable limestone units that belong to the
upper Arcadia Formation of the Hawthorn Group, The upper contact of the Hawthorn
Zone I aquifer is marked by a sharp contact of a pale olive clay of the upper Hawthorn
confining unit with a very light gray limestone, The predominant lithologies within the
aquifer are very light gray to pale olive limestone layers, partially separated from each
other by thin layers of dolomitic limestone, The limestones consist mostly of fine-grained
wackestones that are cemented to varying degrees, The limestones are moderately
1/2312004-135531 V<l': 011- MPERRY
03786-013-000---0
14-7
Be
hard to hard, and usually have moderate to high porosity (both intergranular and moldic
porosity), Sand-sized phosphate grains are present throughout the aquifer, usually at
volumetric abundances on the order of 1 to 3%, The Hawthorn Zone I aquifer occurs at
depths of approximately 290 to 420 feet below land surface in the vicinity of the Town
and ranges in thickness from approximately 100 to 135 feet. The aquifer tends to thin
toward the north in Collier County,
At the base of the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer is a sequence of interbedded marls, clays,
and limestone units that belong to the Miocene-aged, middle Arcadia Formation. These
generally low permeability sediments form the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone, which
separates the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer from the underlying Lower Hawthorn aquifer of
the Floridan Aquifer System, The thickness of the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone
averages over 150 feet in the vicinity of the Town and the overall vertical hydraulic
conductivity of the unit is very low, Transmissivities of the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer
range from 20,000 to approximately 100,000 gpd/ft (SCRWTP report, CDM Missimer,
2000),
Floridan Aquifer Svsteml Lower Hawthorn Aquifer
The Lower Hawthorn aquifer lies beneath the Mid-Hawthorn confining zone and is the
uppermost unit in the Floridan Aquifer System, The Floridan Aquifer System is
regionally extensive and underlies all of Florida and parts of Alabama, Georgia, and
South Carolina, It is used for potable and irrigation water supply in many parts of
Florida,
The upper boundary of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer is marked by a sharp decrease in
the marl and clay content in the lower Arcadia Formation, The Lower Hawthorn aquifer
consists predominantly of interbedded yellowish-gray fossiliferous limestones and pale
olive dolomites, The limestones consist mostly of wackestones with secondary porosity
and a minor amount of very fine to medium-grained carbonate sand that is lithified to
varying degrees, The Lower Hawthorn aquifer limestones are generally moderately hard
and have a moderate to high porosity, The Lower Hawthorn dolomites have a
microsucrosic texture, are very hard, and have variable porosity. The top of the Lower
Hawthorn aquifer occurs at depths ranging from less than 600 to over 800 feet in the
county, dipping to the southeast. The thickness of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer ranges
from approximately 100 to 200 feet.
The hydraulic characteristics of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer are variable in Collier
County, Transmissivity values for the Lower Hawthorn aquifer can range from 10,000
gpdlft to over 2,000,000 gpd/ft over relatively short lateral distances (SCRWTP Report,
CDM Missimer, 2000), A hydraulic trend cannot accurately be evaluated given the high
variability and lack of data; however, the general tendency seems to be a set of ridges
running from northwest to southeast, which alternate with high and then low
transmissivity,
The potentiometric surface of the Lower Hawthorn aquifer is highest in the northeastern
part of the county and decreases to the southwest. The direction of groundwater flow
within the aquifer is therefore towards the southwest. Recharge to the aquifer is due
primarily to direct infiltration of precipitation where the aquifer is close to land surface in
the northern and central part of the state and leakage from other aquifers,
712312004- 135531 Ver: 01'- Mf'ERRY
0311l6..{)13-000--Q
14-8
8e
..'"
SELECTED REFERENCES
Campbell, Kenneth M" 1988, The Geology of Collier County, Florida: Florida Geological
Survey Open File Report No, 25, 14 pp,
CDM/Missimer International, Inc" 2000, Mediterra Phase I irrigation water wellfield
production well completion report: Consultants Report to Bonita Bay Properties,
Inc" Bonita Springs, Florida, 11 p,
Hunter, ME, 1968, Molluscan Guide Fossils in Late Miocene Sediments of Southern
Florida: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, Vol, 18, p,
439-450,
Klein, Howard, 1954, Ground-Water Resources of the Naples Area, Collier County,
Florida: Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigations No, 11, 64 pp,
Klein, Howard, 1972, The Shallow Aquifer of Southwest Florida: Florida Geological
Survey Map Series No, 53,
Knapp, M,S" Burns, W,S" and Sharp, T.S" 1986, Preliminary Assessment of the
Groundwater Resources of Western Collier County, Florida: South Florida Water
Management District, Technical Publication 86-1, 142pp,
Kruseman, G,P" and NA deRidder, 1991, Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data,
2nd ed, Internationallnst. for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI),
Wageningen, Publication no, 47, 377 pp,
Mansfield, W,C" 1939, Notes on the Upper Tertiary and Pleistocene Mollusks of
Peninsular Florida: Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No, 18,57 pp,
McCoy, H, J" 1962, Ground-Water Resources of Collier County, Florida: Florida
Geological Survey Report of Investigations No, 31, 82 p,
Missimer, T. M" 1984, The Geology of South Florida: A Summary: in Environments of
South Florida Present and Past II, p, J, Gleason, ed" Miami Geological Society
Memoir 2, p, 385 - 404,
Missimer T. M" 1992, Stratigraphic relationships of sediment facies within the Tamiami
Formation of southwestern Florida: proposed intraformational correlations, in T. M,
Scott and W, D, Allmon, eds" The Plio-Pliocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of
Southern Florida: Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 36, p, 63-92,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1983a, Location map of the Coral Reef aquifer in
northwestern Collier County, Florida: Report No, 156-83 to the Big Cypress Basin,
South Florida Water Management District, 26 p,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1983b, Groundwater resources of the Cocohatchee
Watershed, Collier County, Florida: Phase III Hydraulic characteristics and yield of
the Coral Reef aquifer: Report No, 155-83 to the Big Cypress Basin, South Florida
Water Management District, 169 p,
7/2312004- 135531 v..,: 01!- MPERRY
0371l6-0B-OOO.-O
14-9
8e
'-
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1986, Hydrogeology of the Collier County Wellfield in
Golden Gate Estates, Collier County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier
County Board of County Commissioners, 125 pp,
Missimer & Associates, Inc., 1987, Completion Report for the Collier County Regional
Wellfield Expansion at Golden Gate Estates: Consultants report to the Collier
County Utility Department, 98 pp,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1988, A Preliminary Plan to Develop a Public Water Supply
Wellfield in Collier County, Florida: Verification of Hydraulic Properties within the
Lower Tamiami Aquifer: Consultants report to the Collier County Utilities
Administration, 78 pp,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1990a, Safe Yield Determination by Three-Dimensional
Hydraulic Modeling of the Lower Tamiami Aquifer beneath Golden Gate Estates,
Collier County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners, 158 pp.
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1990b, Hydrologic Investigation to Evaluate Long Term
Resource Potential of the Hawthorn Aquifer System Zone II at the Unit 25 Parcel,
Marco, Island, Florida: Consultants report prepared for Southern States Utilities,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1991, Phase I Deep Aquifer Hydrogeologic Study, Collier
County, Florida: Consultants report to the Collier County Utilities Division, 61 pp,
Missimer & Associates, Inc" 1993, Phase II Collier County Aquifer Storage and
Recovery Project - Preliminary Report: Consultants report to the Collier County
Utilities Division, 58 pp.
Missimer, T, M" and Martin, W. K., 2001, Hydrogeology of Lee County, Florida in T, M.
Missimer and T. M, Scott, eds" Geology and hydrology of Lee County, Florida:
Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 49, p, 91-137,
Peacock, Roland, 1983, The Post Eocene Stratigraphy of Southern Collier County,
Florida: South Florida Water Management District, Technical Publication 83-5,
42pp,
Scott, T,M" 1988, The Lithostratigraphy of the Hawthorn Group (Miocene) of Florida:
Florida Geological Survey Bulletin No, 59, 148 pp.
Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Ad Hoc Committee on Florida
Hydrostratigraphic Unit Definition, 1986, Hydrogeology units of Florida: Florida
Geological Survey Special Publication No, 28, 8 pp,
B. Describe, in terms of appropriate water quality parameters, the existing ground and
surface water quality conditions on and abutting the site. (The appropriate
parameters and methodology should be agreed to by the regional planning council
and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication conference stage.)
Water quality in the water-table aquifer in most of the study area is typically good with
respect to salinity, However, the water generally has a dissolved iron concentration
7/23/2004- 135531 Var: 01!- MPERRY
03786-013-(01).-0
14-10
.. 8 C
above the drinking water standard and significant concentrations of organic acids that
often give the water a yellowish or brownish color, The presence of these compounds in
the water can cause treatment problems because of the potential for trihalomethane
(THM) or other disinfection-by-product (DBP) formation,
Water quality in the Lower Tamiami aquifer generally meets most state and federal
drinking water standards in much of Collier County, Dissolved chloride concentrations
typically range from less than 50 mg/l to 200 mg/l, Where confinement from the water-
table aquifer is present, the Lower Tamiami contains water that is low in dissolved iron
and color, Iron content is high in the Lower Tamiami aquifer in wells where confinement
is poor. Water from the aquifer can be treated to meet the applicable drinking water
standards using conventional or membrane treatment methods,
Water quality sampling was conducted on six existing irrigation production wells at the
project site, The locations of the wells are shown in Figure 148 - 1, Although specific
construction details were not available for each well, the water use permit records
indicate that production wells are generally completed from approximately 60 to 80 feet
into the Lower Tamiami aquifer,
The water samples were analyzed for the following parameters:
Specific conductance
Chloride
pH
Dissolved Solids
Temperature
Nitrate
Sulphate
Sulfide
Calcium
Iron
Total Hardness
Calcium Hardness
Results are listed in the attached Table 148 - 1, The water quality analyses indicate
that most parameters were within normal concentrations, with the exception of iron
concentration in wells 3, 4 and 6, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) in well 6, The
maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for Primary and Secondary Drinking Water
Standards are listed in the Table, The hardness concentrations for all sampled wells
were higher than that considered acceptable for potable use, Additional sampling and
analysis for additional parameters was conducted on well #2 (BCC #30), which is
located at the proposed water treatment plant site, The results of three sampling events
at Well #2 are listed in Table 148 - 2, During the June sampling event pump problems
occurred, Anomalous results of certain parameters such as iron and color likely reflect
inadequate purging prior to sampling,
The results indicate that if this groundwater source is used for potable use, treatment
may have to address water softening and iron concentration issues, Although limited
sampling was conducted at the project site, experience in the area indicates that
relatively high iron concentrations can occur even in the confined aquifers, This is likely
attributable to a number of factors, including variable thickness of confining units, water
quality changes accompanying long term irrigation pumpage, or interaquifer leakage due
to well construction methods or current well condition,
In the Sandstone aquifer, water quality is generally good in the upper part of the aquifer,
with dissolved chloride concentrations of 250 mg/l or less, However, salinity levels
typically increase with depth,
7/2312004-135531 VOC01!-MPERRY
03786-013-000-_0
14-11
Be
Water quality in the Hawthorn Zone I aquifer is quite variable in Collier County,
Dissolved chloride concentrations range from less than 200 mgll in the northeastern
section of the county to between 2000 and 3000 mgll to the west and south, Although
there is not an abundance of data in the study area, water quality trends indicate that
dissolved chloride concentrations on the order of 200 mgll are likely at the Town,
Water quality in the Lower Hawthorn aquifer varies greatly across Collier County,
Salinity in the Lower Hawthorn aquifer generally increases to the south and west in
Collier County, Dissolved chloride concentrations are likely greater than 1000 mgll in
the vicinity of the Town and generally from 2000-3000 mgll in other areas of Collier
County, The water is generally not suitable for individual, agricultural or industrial uses
without desalination treatment.
C. Describe the measures which will be used to mitigate (or avoid where possible)
potential adverse effects upon ground and surface water quality, including any
resources identified in Subquestion A.
Measures which will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse effects upon surface water
and shallow groundwater at, and adjacent to the site, will include all proven effective
best management practices (BMP's) which are appropriate for the site, These will
include proper timing and minimum applications of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides
on landscaped areas of the property, Whenever possible, biodegradable varieties will
be utilized, Slow release nitrogen fertilizers will be used, A routine program of
coordination will be undertaken with the county extension office of the Soil Conservation
Service,
Irrigation of common areas and golf course areas will be performed by deep, infrequent
waterings in order to encourage deeper rooting of turf grass, This will allow the grass to
obtain more water and nutrients than a turf grass having a short root system due to
shallow, daily waterings, In addition, irrigation will be limited to the hours between dusk
and dawn to reduce the amount of water lost to evaporation. Production well locations
will be selected to minimize interference drawdown between the wells and drawdown
beneath on-site or adjacent wetland areas,
Best management practices will also be utilized to mitigate any adverse impacts from
stormwater runoff, The use of BMP's in the design of surface water management
systems is required by the SFWMD, The BMP's to be employed are discussed in the
response to Question 19, but will include utilization of detention ponds, dry retention
areas, and vegetative systems (grassed swales and filter strips). These features are
designed to provide runoff treatment to improve water quality through attenuation by
increasing storage retention and travel time prior to off-site discharge, Compliance with
applicable stormwater quality regulations will be achieved by utilizing BMP's in the
surface water management system design and verified through monitoring required by
conditions of the surface water management permit that will be issued by the SFWMD,
7/23/2004-135531 Ver01!_IItPERRY
03786-013-000-.0
14-12
- Roads
-- Elevation Contours
-- Ave Maria DRI
~@)
'"-.
~--
.~
@
'20~
Ave Maria DRI
'.....
{s-
"-...
!II'"
N
A
20,000
o
....
t!
?ii'
,
FEET
(-
/' 5../
,/,-,--",/
20 ../-_.
@
~ 0 \!:. -----
z
.
"
~
" ~
5
u
<
~
~ "",
'"
,.
"
D
1i '.
"6
~
! Contour Interval = 5 feet
u
Figure 14A - 1
CDNI Ave Marla DRI
14-13 Topography of Northern Collier County
r
0 Series Formation
Pleistocene Pamlicol
F Surficial
Pliocene Tamiami Aquifer
100 System
200
Peace
River
300 Confining
Beds
0-
400 ::> Intermediate
e
Miocene Cl Aquifer
c: System
~
0
500 .c
'i
'" ~T
:I: T
~ - Marl,cIay, Confining
600 Arcadia - ~ limestone,
~T_ yellowish gray, Beds
- low penneability
T -
~ - ~
-
(]) 700
(])
LL
~
.r:
-
a. 800
(])
0
900 Floridan
Aquifer
Oligocene Suwannee System
Limestone
1000
1400
Avon
Park
1100
1200
~
z
.
'"
~
"
3
N
.;
.
Ocala
Group
1300
Eocene
;
it 1500
~
i D Sand B Sandstone ~ Clayl Marl ~ Limestone and Marl ~ Limestone ~ Dolomite
~
1
u
CDM
Figure 14A - 2
Ave Marla DRI
Generalized Hydrogeology Beneath Collier County
14-14
'~
- Roads
---- Elevation Contours
._-,-- Ave Maria DRI
N
fA.
20,000
o
FEET
/,/"""'."......
",,/
~'
~.
~~,J>
/- 300'/'
/'"
V""""
(f)
;u
N
<0
,-
d"'d"""'.
./ m
< CJ
CD
, CD
co (f)
~ Dl
l 0
a. -
z CD 0
~ U> lD
lD <
" a a.
il
..;
.;
~
I
;;;
~
~
:i
.
~
~
0
CDM
/'
,.,./'"
/
/
// ,
/'/
/
(C:~o /
CR 846 Immokalee Rd
,-- 550-'-'--'-'~,
"'/~ --,
,,...,.-"'~
.__800_,.
"
'-...,
'"
-~
--
"
"
\
300
)
/'
Oil Well Road
"~
"
.'''~
--
//
/'
,,/
..,,.~'
/-
~
~
Contour Interval = 250 gpdlft
Flgure14A-3
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Water Table Aquifer (1,000 gpdlft)
14-15
- Roads
....._-, Elevation Contours
"--., Ave Maria DRI
'l" C
N
A
0 20,000
FEET
en
;:0
N
<0
"""""'~---',......
--
5~"">"""""
.-.''I'~_ .."..Z
"",a~~<~~'~i<>;,>", /....
~.%~,~,~~~';~ ~~~ /~--/
''''''''''''''~ \9 /'
~~S~;:;~~~:~~:<~~:>(S
,-.""',,',,,-,,;,..-
,-_~=-'t~" /'.
,~-
,/
,':J~/ J
Immokal;e Rd ,/
{]~ ~
l Ave Maria DRI
Oil Well Road
---..
~
i
z
m
<
CD
,
'"
iil
0-
CD
en
to
<:
0-
o
CD
en
o
~
o
to
<
0-
~
"
il
~
:l
~
'"
,.
~
';l
~
~
~
u
~
Contour Interval = 25 I_t
CDNI
Figure 14A-4
Ave Maria DRI
Thickness of the Tamiami Confining Layer
14-16
- Roads
---- -. Elevation Contours
--'-" Ave Maria DRI
".. C
N
fA.
0 20,000
-
FEET
C/J
;;0
N
<0
1\ I
.5'a /
Va .I
~/
V~,-.___,.'.J"
\
._- 100000 ..-....-
"
\
O'a
Va
Vo
'"
...., CR 846
Immokalee Rd
C/J
;;0
N
<0
.,
Ave Maria DRI
'"
'"
l.
z
m
/ai
/j t
/ '"
OJ
<
c.
o
(1)
C/J
o
6"
OJ
<
c.
~
~
;a
!
~
~
..
'"
'"
';l
~
~
u
~
Contour Interval = 200000 gpdJft
CDIVI
Figure 14A-5
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Lo_r Tamiami Aquifer (gpdJft)
14-17
- Roads
'"
l.
z
~
;a
-g
<i
"
~
..
~
'"
'"
~
.
"
.
5
~
o
CDIVI
,.,,,,,
"
-.,
--'" Elevation Contours
SR82
',>,';"
"
"
"-""<>""~".,.",,,.,>- ..-,,.,
(
Immokalee Rd
---- Ave Maria DRI
fir ._'. .. '-. '''..
;;0
N
<0
'"
.........
"
,
"
\.
\
\
-
~"""--"'-"'''<..
'"
C/J
;;0
N
<0
, '., Oil Well Road
\\ \\ / ~
-..-/ ~
\ ",,_..._--_//~
" ,/
.............._-_../
~.
"
o
(1)
C/J
o
~
o
OJ
<'
c.
~---
"\
\
\
\
B
&
';f
B
&
n;;
/
Contour Interval = 20000 gpdJft
Figure 14A.6
Ave Maria DRI
Transmissivity in the Sandstone Aquifer (gpdJft)
14-18
Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
0-5
Sand, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), quartz, fine-grained.
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) with some olive-gray (5 Y 4/1)
staining, texturally variable, cuttings range from biosparite to
biomicrite, hard, not friable, abundant large fossil fragments
(bivalves and gastropods).
5-15
15-20
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite, fossiliferous,
medium-grained, soft, friable, high visible porosity (intergranular to
less abundantly moldic after aragonitic fossils), some large fossil
(bivalves, minor bryozoans) fragments,
20-25
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), highly fossiliferous (bivalves), soft,
very low permeability, abundant large fossil (bivalve) fragments.
25-42
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2),
highly fossiliferous (bivalves), soft, very low permeability.
42-60
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), packed biomicrite, abundant
sand-sized and larger (centimeter-sized) fossil, diverse fauna, soft,
poorly friable, high porosity with common moldic pores after
aragonitic fossils, Common sand-sized black/dark gray fossil
fragments,
60-70
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite), hard,
high visible intergranular porosity, common moldic pores after
aragonitic fossils,
70-90
Sandstone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), quartz, fine to medium-
grained, very fossiliferous, calcite-cemented, hard, not friable,
moderate porosity, Common (1-2%) sand-sized black phosphate
grains. Common large fossils, including bivalves and gastropods.
90-100
Sandstone, two lithologies present:
A) Yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), quartz, fine-grained, calcite-cemented,
common fossil fragments, common (1-2%) sand-sized phosphate
grains.
B) Medium gray (N5) to dark medium gray (N4), quartz, fine-
grained, less fossiliferous than lighter colored sandstone,
100-110
Sandstone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to medium gray (N4), quartz,
mostly fine-grained, fossiliferous (common large bivalves), mostly
moderately hard, moderate porosity, common (5%) granule-sized
phosphate fragments,
C:\Oocumenlsand Settings\mpeny\local Seltings\TempOfary Inlernet FileslOLK3\Table 14A-1 MCSOOllog.doc
14-19
Be
'-
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
110-144
Sand, pale olive (10 YR 6/2) to (10 YR 5/2), quartz, clay-rich
matrix, fine-grained, very fossiliferous (abundant large bivalves),
common (2-5%) granule-sized phosphate fragments, Bivalve
fragments are white (N9) to very pale orange (10 YR 8/2).
Limestone, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1) and pale yellowish-brown (10
YR 6/2) to light yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/4), sparse biomicrite to
biosparite, hard, very high visible porosity, both intergranular and
moldic. Fossils include casts and molds of bivalves, gastropods,
and (rare) corals,
144-174
174-198
Clay, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), common silt and fine sand-sized
quartz grains, soft, very low permeability, Minor sand-sized
phosphate grains and fossils (gastropods).
198-242
Clay, very light olive-gray (5 Y 7/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
common medium sand to granule-sized quartz grains, soft, very
low permeability, Minor coarse sand to granule-sized phosphate
grains,
242-262
Clay, pale olive (10 YR 6/2), soft, abundant very fine to very coarse
sand-sized quartz grains, common rounded sand-sized phosphate
grains, very low permeability. Minor sandstone (very fine-grained)
and siltstone.
262-270
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), abundant silt and very fine sand-sized
quartz grains, soft, very low permeability, common (5%) sand-
sized phosphate grains, minor fossils (gastropods), A lot of sand
production during drilling.
270-289
Clay, medium grayish-olive (10 Y 5/2) to medium greenish- gray (5
GY 5/1) and less commonly (10%) pale greenish- yellow (10 Y
8/2), abundant silt and very fine sand-sized quartz grains, soft,
Common (5%) sand-sized phosphate grains, fossils are rare. A lot
of sand production during drilling.
289-297
Limestone, very light gray (N8) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderate hardness, moderate to high
porosity, Limestone consists of large bivalve fragments in a
carbonate sand matrix, Common very fine sand-sized phosphate
grains.
C:\Documents and Settings\l1llell)'\Local SellingslTemporary Intemet Files\OLK3\Table 14A.1 MCSOO1log.doc
14-20
rac
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
297-305
Limestone (90%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, very good moldic porosity, marl (10%), yellowish-
gray (5 Y 8/1), soft, phosphatic, moderate to low porosity.
305-314
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant shell fragments (40%), coral fragments
common (20%), fossiliferous, excellent apparent porosity.
Limestone becoming pale olive (10 YR 6/2) with calcarenitic
texture from 314'.
314-320
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenite (biosparite), fossiliferous, moderately hard, phosphatic,
high porosity (moldic), harder from 318' to 320'.
320-324
Limestone, light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard to
moderately soft, fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic),
324-335
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, phosphatic, good intergranular porosity,
Limestone (30%), light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic).
335-369
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, abundant molds and casts of aragonitic fossils,
high to very high porosity, (good H20 producer). Limestone is
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) from 340' to 369'.
369-392
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, abundant molds and
casts, high porosity.
392-397
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
calcarenitic texture, moderately hard, fossiliferous, high porosity,
including abundant moldic pores.
397-400
Limestone (70%), pale olive (10 Y 6/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
as above. Marl (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm,
apparently very low porosity and permeability,
400-408
Limestone (75%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), biomicrite, slightly
(quartz) sandy, moderately hard, fossiliferous, abundant, (50%)
coral and shell fragments.
408-412
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), calcarenite (biosparite),
fossiliferous, moderately hard, high apparent porosity.
C:\Documenls and Settings\rrperrylLocal Sellings\Temporary Intemet FileslOLK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-21
i- Be
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
412-415
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), soft to firm, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability, abundant quartz sand, phosphatic,
abundant shell fragments (20%),
415-418.5
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity, large percentage (20%) 1-2mm phosphate at
418', abundant shell fragments (20%).
418.5-420
Dolomite, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), microsucrosic texture, hard, slightly
phosphatic, moderate to high porosity, low apparent permeability,
420-429
Clay, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), soft to firm, sticky to cohesive, slightly
phosphatic, low apparent porosity and very low permeability, Clay
is greenish-gray (5 Y 4/1), from 402' and is interbedded with
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, abundant shell fragments, apparent high
porosity,
429-431
Clay (40%), pale olive, soft to stiff, phosphatic, very low
permeability and Limestone (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2),
biomicrite, moderately hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, abundant
shell, moderate to high apparent porosity.
431-438
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, high porosity (moldic), Fossils
include coral and echinoderm fragments.
438-440
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to dusky yellow (5 Y 6/4),
biomicrite, moderately hard, fossiliferous (abundant echinoderm
and coral fragments), high to very high porosity,
440-449
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, fossiliferous, coral fragments predominant, high
porosity (moldic),
449-451
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite as above.
Marl (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), phosphatic, soft to firm, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability,
451-454
Limestone. yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high porosity (moldic),
C:\Documents and Setlings\mpeny\locat Setlings\TempofClfy Intemet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-1 MC5001Iog.doc
14-22
~w 8 C
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
454-459
Limestone (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to white (N9),
biomicrite, phosphatic, fossiliferous, moderately hard, high porosity
(moldic). Marl (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), soft,
phosphatic, low porosity and very low permeability,
459-468
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly cemented
biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard, phosphatic,
fossiliferous, high intergranular porosity, and Marl (20%) as above,
468-469
Limestone, white (N9), calcarenite (poorly cemented biosparite),
moderately hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity.
469-471
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, fossiliferous, high porosity,
471-474
Marl (50%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), soft, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability, Limestone (50%),
very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity.
474-478
Limestone (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), phosphatic, moderately soft, fossiliferous,
high porosity. Marl (30%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft, phosphatic, low apparent porosity
and very low permeability.
478-479
Marl, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
479-487
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, high porosity,
487-497
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity. Marl (50%),
yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), soft to stiff phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability,
497-508
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to pale olive (10 Y 6/2), firm,
phosphatic, 1 mm particles of phosphate and shell, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability. Clay is grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2)
from 499' to 508', abundant (30%) phosphate grains, 1-2mm from
505 to 508'.
C:\Documents and Sellings\mpeny\local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-1 MC5001Jog.doc
14-23
Be
"......
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
508-515
Clay (60%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity. Limestone (20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
biosparite, phosphatic, moderate to hard, good apparent porosity,
Marl (10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft,low apparent porosity
and very low permeability, Phosphate (10%).
515-516
Dolomite, grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), crystalline, hard, moderately
apparent porosity,
516-518.5
Clay, grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), firm, cohesive, phosphatic with low
apparent porosity and very low permeability.
518,5-525
Dolomite (60%), grayish-olive (10 Y 4/2), microsucrosic texture,
hard, phosphatic, moderate to high porosity (moldic), low apparent
permeability, occasional large 2-5 mm phosphate particles
common, Dolomite (40%), very light gray (N8), sucrosic, vuggy,
hard, phosphatic, high porosity,
Limestone (60%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft with moderate porosity. Marl
(10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability, Clay (30%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), olive-
gray (5 Y 4/1), firm, cohesive, phosphatic, low apparent porosity
and very low permeability,
525-545
545-549
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphate and shell
(10%), low apparent porosity and very low permeability,
549-552
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately
hard, fossiliferous (abundant coral and bryozoan fragments), high
porosity and Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), soft to firm, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability, (2%) occasional
phosphate granules.
552-560
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), to pale olive (10 Y 6/2), firm,
cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low permeability,
accessory constituents, phosphate granules 1-2mm (5%), coral
fragments (25%),
Limestone, pale olive (10 Y 6/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
abundant molds and casts, abundant shell fragments (bivalves),
high porosity.
Clay, light gray (N8), soft to firm, low apparent porosity, very low
permeability,
560-560,5
560,5-562
C:\Documenls and Settings\nl)erry\Local Settings\Temporary Inlemel FileslOLK3\Table 14A-l MCS001Iog.doc
14-24
8e
.~
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
562-570
Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to light gray (N8),
biomicrite, very soft, fossiliferous, abundant (20%) shell fragments
(including bryozoans and bivalves), high apparent porosity. Clay
(50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, low apparent porosity,
very low permeability.
570-574
Clay (70%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft to firm, phosphatic
(flecks of phosphate), low apparent porosity and very low
permeability. Limestone (30%), yellowish-gray, as above.
574-576
Clay, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability. Common (30%) shell
fragments (calcitic bivalves),
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), biomicrite, moderately hard,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, high porosity,
576-577
577-579.5
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/2), to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
biomicrite, moderately hard, phosphatic, (flecks of phosphate
throughout rock), occasional (1-2%) phosphate grains, high
porosity (moldic).
579,5-581
Clay, yellowish-gray (5 y 8/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), soft to
firm, cohesive, phosphatic, flecks of phosphate, abundant (20%)
phosphate granules, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability.
581-585
Dolomite (90%), greenish-gray/(5 GY 6/1) microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate to low porosity. Clay (10%),
greenish-gray (5 Y 6/1), soft to firm, low porosity,
585-589
Clay, greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability, common (15%) phosphate
granules,
589-589.5
Dolomite (90%), greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate to low porosity. Clay (10%),
greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, low porosity and very low
permeability,
589.5-592
Clay, greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), soft to firm, phosphatic, low
apparent porosity and very low permeability, phosphatic.
C:\Documents and Setlings\mperry\local Settings\Temporary Inlernet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-25
8C~-
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
592-597
Limestone (80%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), micrite, marly,
moderately soft to moderately hard, phosphatic, fossiliferous, high
apparent porosity, phosphate granules (10%), 2-5 mm size.
Dolomite (10%), greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), microsucrosic texture,
hard to moderately hard, moderate porosity,
597-609
Limestone (100%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), phosphatic, biomicrite,
moderately soft, phosphatic, marly, high porosity,
609-611
Limestone, light gray (N7), biomicrite, moderately hard,
phosphatic, abundant shell fragments, high moldic porosity,
611-614
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, high moldic porosity, 1-2% phosphate granules,
614-620
Dolomite, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1),
crystalline texture, phosphatic, very hard, high porosity (moldic),
additional constituents: phosphate (1-2%),
620-629
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, moderately hard,
abundant molds and casts, high porosity (moldic),
629-630
Dolomite (30%), pale greenish-yellow (10 Y 8/2), microsucrosic
texture, hard, moderate apparent porosity, Limestone (70%), as
above,
630-635
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, phosphatic,
moderately hard, high porosity (moldic),
635-646
Limestone (95%), light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1),
biomicrite, hard, phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high to
very high moldic porosity, Calcite cement in some molds.
Dolomite (-5%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), crystalline texture, hard, low
apparent porosity.
646-654
Marl 20%,light gray (N7), soft, low apparent porosity, and very low
permeability. Limestone (10%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard,
phosphatic, high porosity (intergranular), Limestone (65%), light
gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), moderately soft to
moderately hard, calcarenite (biosparite), phosphatic, high porosity
(intergranular), Dolomite (5%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), sucrosic, hard,
moderate apparent porosity,
C:\Documenls and Settings\mperryllocal Sellings\Tempor3ry Internet FileslOLK3\Table 14A-1 MC5Q011og.doc
14-26
8e
~-...
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
654-669
Limestone, light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5 GY 6/1), biomicrite,
moderately hard, abundant molds and casts, phosphatic, very high
porosity (moldic). Limestone is partially dolomitized (flecks of
brownish-gray (5 YR 4/1)).
669-670
Dolomite (10%), light olive-brown (5 Y 5/6), microsucrosic texture,
very hard, phosphatic, low apparent porosity. Dolomite (90%), very
pale orange (10 YR 8/2), microsucrosic texture, molds and casts,
fossiliferous, phosphatic, hard, high porosity (moldic),
670-680
Dolomite (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), sucrosic, hard, with
1 mm flecks of olive-brown dolomite, as above, phosphate, good
moldic porosity, Dolomite (30%), light gray (N7) to greenish-gray (5
GY 6/1), hard, microsucrosic texture, phosphatic, abundant molds
and casts, high apparent porosity, softer zone from 677-680',
680-694
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to white (N9), biomicrite,
abundant molds and casts, moderately hard, high porosity
(moldic),
694-705
Limestone, very light gray (N8), biomicrite, moderately hard,
slightly phosphatic, abundant molds and casts, high to very high
porosity.
705-707
Limestone, very light gray (N8), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, slightly phosphatic, high porosity (intergranular).
707-711
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to grayish-orange (10 YR 7/4),
calcarenite (biosparite), moderately hard, abundant molds and
casts, high porosity (moldic and intergranular),
711-712
Dolomite (50%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2) to pale greenish-yellow
(10 Y 8/2), microsucrosic texture, very hard, low apparent porosity.
Dolomite (50%), grayish-orange (10 YR 7/2), microsucrosic
texture, very hard, low apparent porosity.
712-719
Sand, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1) to very light gray (N8), very
fine grained, subangular to subrounded particles,
C:\Documents and SettingslfT1>erry\local Seltings\TelTporary Intemet FileslOLK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-27
" 8e"'"
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
719-721
Dolomite (40%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to pale yellowish-
brown (10 YR 6/2), microsucrosic texture, moderately hard,
moderate to high apparent porosity (moldic and intercrystalline).
Dolomite (40%), yellow (10 Y 8/6), microsucrosic texture,
moderately hard to hard, moderate to low apparent porosity, Clay
(20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 7/2), soft, slightly cohesive,low
apparent porosity and very low permeability,
721-740
Limestone (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) calcarenite,
moderately hard, high porosity (moldic), Marl (30%), very light
gray (N8), soft low apparent porosity and very low permeability.
740-744
Clay (70%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to yellowish-gray (5 Y
8/1), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability. Marl (20%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/2), soft, low
apparent porosity, Limestone (10%), yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1),
biomicrite, soft, marly, high porosity.
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (very poorly
cemented biosparite), sandy, moderately soft, high porosity
(intergranular).
744-750
750-760
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to grayish-orange
(10 YR 7/4), calcarenite (very poorly cemented biosparite), sandy
texture, moderately soft and firm, high porosity (mostly
intergranular, minor moldic). Calcite infilling molds at 755',
Abundant molds and casts from 755-760', marl (20%), light gray
(N8), soft, moderate to low apparent porosity,
760-773
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, high porosity
(intergranular), common (20%) shell (bivalve) fragments. Marl
(20%), light gray (N8), soft, low apparent porosity permeability,
773-774
Clay, light greenish-gray (5 G 8/1), soft to firm, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability.
774-780
Limestone (80%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite,
(poorly cemented biosparite) moderately soft, fossiliferous,
abundant to occasional molds and casts, high porosity, Marl
(20%), light gray (N8), soft, low to moderate porosity,
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, marly, microfossils present,
moderate to high porosity (intergranular),
780-791
C:\Documents and Settings\mperry\local Settings\TerJl)orary Intemet FileslOlK3\Table 14A-1 MCSO011og.doc
14-28
8e
,..",
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
791-793
Limestone (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite,
moderately hard, occasional molds and casts, high apparent
porosity, Limestone (40%), light greenish-gray (5 G 8/1),
biomicrite, moderately hard, high porosity,
793-794
Limestone, grayish-orange (10 YR 7/4), biomicrite, moderately
hard, occasional molds and casts, high moldic porosity,
794-799
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, molds and casts common, high apparent porosity,
799-804
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, slightly more
sandy than above, moderately hard, good high porosity
(intergranular and moldic).
804-808
Clay (70%), marl, white (N9), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent
porosity and very low permeability. Limestone (30%) as above,
808-818
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), calcarenite (biosparite)
texture, moderately soft to moderately hard, high porosity
(intergranular and moldic),
818-819
Limestone, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, moderately
hard, very high apparent porosity,
819-819.5
Clay, very pale orange (10 YR 8/2) to pale yellowish-brown (10 YR
6/2), soft to firm, cohesive, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability,
819.5-820
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite,
(biosparite), moderately soft, high apparent intergranular porosity,
820-835
Limestone (70%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite,
calcarenitic texture, moderately hard to moderately soft, high
porosity (intergranular). Limestone (30%), very pale orange (10 YR
8/2), biomicrite, marly, moderately soft, high intergranular porosity.
835-835.5
Clay (50%), grayish-brown, soft, low apparent porosity and very
low permeability, phosphate (50%),
835.5-838
Limestone (70%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite
(calcarenitic texture), moderately hard, high intergranular porosity.
Limestone (30%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), biomicrite, marly,
moderately soft, high apparent porosity,
C:\Documenls and Settings\rl'1:leny\Loca! Settings\Temporary Internel FileslOLK3\Table 14A-l MC50011og.doc
14-29
'ac
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
838-847
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light gray (N7), calcarenite,
moderately soft, high porosity (intergranular),
847-848
Clay (50%), olive-gray (5 Y 4/1), soft, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability, Limestone (50%), yellowish-gray (as above),
848-852
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to olive-gray (5 Y 4/1),
biomicrite, abundant foraminifera, moderately hard, high apparent
porosity,
852-860
Limestone, light greenish-gray (5 GY 8/1), to light olive-gray (5 Y
6/1), calcarenite (biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard,
very high intergranular porosity,
860-861
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), micrite, sandy, moderately soft
to moderately hard, high porosity (intergranular),
861-862
Clay (60%), very pale orange (10 YR 8/2), soft to firm,low
apparent porosity and very low permeability. Clay (40%), dark
yellowish-brown (10 YR 4/2), soft, low apparent porosity,
862-866
Limestone, olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), biomicrite, sandy, moderately hard,
high porosity.
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), biomicrite, sandy (quartz),
marly, moderately hard to moderately soft, high porosity,
866-874
874-875
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), biomicrite, slightly
sandy (quartz), moderately soft to moderately hard, high apparent
porosity.
875-880
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (biosparite),
moderately hard, microfossils present, very high intergranular
porosity,
880-885
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1) to light gray (N7), calcarenite
(biosparite/packed biomicrite), marly, moderately soft, high
apparent intergranular porosity,
885-890
Dolomite, light olive-gray (5 Y 6/1), microsucrosic texture, very
hard, moderate porosity. Clay (2%) at 890'. Clay is dark greenish-
gray (5 GY 4/1), firm, low apparent porosity and very low
permeability.
C:\Documents and Sellings\mperrylLocal SellingslTemporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-1 MC50011og.doc
14-30
""ae
Table 14A-1
Geologist's Log of MC-5001
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqy
890-893
Dolomite, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), microsucrosic texture,
very hard, moderate to low apparent porosity.
893-894
Clay, very light gray (N8), soft to firm, low apparent porosity and
very low permeability,
894-900
Limestone, yellowish-gray (5 Y 8/1), calcarenite (poorly cemented
biosparite), moderately soft to moderately hard, high porosity
(intergranular).
900-908
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, phosphatic, occasional
molds and casts, very high intergranular porosity, Molds and casts
are abundant from 906' to 908'.
908-910
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2) to light gray (N7),
biomicrite, slightly sandy, moderately hard, abundant molds and
casts, phosphatic, high porosity (moldic)..
910-917
Limestone (95%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite
(poorly cemented biosparite), moderately soft, slightly phosphatic,
occasional molds and casts (10%), high porosity (intergranular).
Clay (5%), dark greenish-gray (5 GY 4/1), partially lithified,
moderately soft, low apparent porosity and very low permeability.
Sand, pale yellowish brown (10 YR 6/2), quartz, very fine grained,
subangular to subrounded particles.
917-917,5
917,5-920
Limestone, pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly
cemented biosparite), moderately soft, phosphatic, high porosity
(intergranular),
920-927
Sand (80%), pale yellowish-brown (10 YR 6/2), predominantly
quartz, very fine grained, subangular to subrounded particles,
unconsolidated, phosphatic. Limestone (20%), pale yellowish-
brown (10 YR 6/2), calcarenite (poorly cemented biosparite),
moderately soft, phosphatic, high intergranular porosity,
C:\Documenls and Settings\mperry\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK3\Table 14A-1 MCSO01log.doc
14-31
~'8C
,do."""
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well MC-5075
10 -12
Litholoqy
Sand, fine-grained, quartz, well-sorted, subangular, fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%),
Sandy clay, pale olive (10Y 6/2), sticky, fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%).
Depth (feet)
0-10
12 -14
No recovery; probably shell,
14 - 22
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, soft, sandy, high macro porosity
(intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%),
22 -28
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2), fossil wackestone, soft,
sandy, high macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%).
28 - 35
Limestone, yellowish gray (5Y 7/2) to pale olive (10Y 6/2) to
medium light gray (N6), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%), trace sandstone,
35 - 45
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, moderately soft to moderately hard,
sandy, high macroporosity (intergranular, mOldic), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%).
45 - 55
Limestone, pale olive (10Y 6/2) to medium gray (N5) to medium
dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-5%),
55 - 60
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y
7/2), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity
(intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-5%),
60-80
Shell (95%), Limestone (5%), pale olive (10Y 6/2), fossil
wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular,
moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%),
80 - 107
Shell (95%). Sandy clay (5%), pale olive (10Y 6/2), sticky, fine-
grained phosphate (1-2%), trace limestone,
107 -120
Limestone, medium gray (N5) to medium dark gray (N4), fossil
wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular,
moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-5%),
C:\Documenls and Setlings\mperry\Local SetlingslTemporary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-2 MC5075Iog.doc
14-32
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well MC-5075
- Continued -
oc
(]
'.
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
120-130
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to medium gray (N5) to
medium dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high
macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%),
130-140
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to medium gray (N5),
fossil wackestone, moderately hard, high macroporosity
(intergranular, moldic), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
140-160
Limestone, very pale orange (10YR 8/2) to yellowish gray (5Y 7/2)
to medium gray (N5) to medium dark gray (N4), fossil wackestone,
moderately hard, high macroporosity (intergranular, moldic), fine-
grained phosphate (1-2%).
160 -170
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to granule-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy
clay and limestone,
170 -180
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace
sandy clay.
180 -190
Shell and sand, very coarse-grained sand to medium pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace
sandy clay,
190 - 200
Shell and sand, coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy
clay,
200 - 210
Sand, coarse-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, few shells, trace sandy
clay.
210 - 220
Sand, very fine to fine-grained, quartz, poorly-sorted, subrounded,
220 - 230
Sand, very fine to very coarse-grained, quartz, poorly-sorted,
subrounded,
230 - 240
Sand (95%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, Sandy clay
(5%), yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), sticky, fine-grained phosphate
(1-2%),
240 - 260
Sand, very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded,
C:\Documenls and SetlingslrT'perry\Local SellingslTemporary Internet FileslOlK3\Table 14A-2 MC5075!og.doc
14-33
"se
-
Table 14A-2
Geologist's Log of Well MC-5075
- Continued -
Depth (feet)
Litholoqv
Sand, very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded, trace sandy clay.
260 - 270
270 - 277
Sand (95%), very fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay
(5%), yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
277 - 280
Sand (70%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Sandstone
(30%), fine-grained, quartz, well-sorted, subrounded.
280 - 295
Clay (60%), pale yellowish green (10GY 7/2), fine-grained
phosphate (1-2%), Sand (40%), very fine-grained sand to fine
pebble-sized gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-
rounded, trace sandstone,
295 - 300
Sand (60%), very fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized
gravel, quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded. Clay (40%),
light olive gray (5Y 6/1), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%), trace
sandstone,
300 -310
Sand (50%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded, Clay (50%), dusky
yellowish green (5GY 5/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
310-320
Sand (90%), fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel, quartz,
poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (10%), yellowish
gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%).
320 - 340
Sand (98%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (1-2%),
yellowish gray (5Y 7/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%),
340 - 358
Sand (90%), very fine-grained sand to fine pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to well-rounded. Clay (10%),
pale olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%),
358 - 360
Sand (90%), fine-grained sand to medium pebble-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded. Clay (5%), pale
olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%), Sandstone (5%),
fine-grained sand, quartz, well-sorted, subrounded.
360 - 370
Clay (90%), pale olive (10Y 6/2), fine-grained phosphate (1-2%),
Sand (10%), very fine-grained sand to granule-sized gravel,
quartz, poorly-sorted, subangular to rounded, trace sandstone,
C:\Documents and Settings\mperry\local Settings\Tel'TllOrary Internet Files\OlK3\Table 14A-2 MC507S'og.doc
14-34
14A"'3.
c--
D
E
P
I
R
(Ii)
a
s
valL.
Omn SP)
10
" 9~,eJ~1}11)~,1I1i&tiH,~'3fJfJ:, ANDwlllj,htl.eJloQI;
U:O:!!OlK)
IS
:~6'
2t
~
~ ,40
'"
" V
"
Il
,
" 45"
<'.'
:;.,:.l\
~
l;?
l'l
!1 :5;0.
..
Ii
1;i
'"
~
...,
~.
'" 55
DI!IlLCR;
t-Qilll'l\!l!N'!',
~IInHOlJf
HOLE Dl'L
C~AR~$
B-327
AVE MA~IA UNI\']RsrrY
IMlvfOKALEE\.FL
D: Mily :iV, 2003
"NO,: 6181-03-20.$5
- - -.. . . '. .... ..
PAGE J OF 2J
-,
-filL~ Rl;('.oHD t '
'Sl.l!\SU!\l'ACE
LOCATION.
I.OCATlONS
'STfiRPACI!s
14-35
-
T~~~ 1 4,1\-3
II
.
D
11
P
:1;
H'
(it)
S$ -
SOlI. CLASSIFICATION
AND REM1\Ri{S
'i~: '
Pr..~%)
Nl>t'lL)
',y;t','^'"
.... FlN!lS{li)
. SP'r\1>pD
30 '40, $D till 1IJ
).1.(4'&)
lb'
S S!;EIC11AY,
'/M:BOLS
Vl;RJ ,10 0
_t.s(el.)
:on.u~tnuidi05S~'S:H~t
IOO!l'.ANlmOl'f Ojlj "
'ITON~lJlIJ!lJll/!l:.olil'.
", ,',.' '"" '".i,',". """ ,
"00
~:IQ',VE ,~:,D~SSJ~tt:~oiijent
ts:~~ ~ujJd:~~rd::t.itl'l~ttnic)
~
Drin~ nmo
62:~hl) 63.:S~ 3:25
:45~&~~zj,lig;$. 5~1,s
,l~K~!,~~ n~o~ 1:~3
.70
~90'SE:,g~ (~tedSAND'wjthJlm.eswu':(Vet;)" ,tift
um,~Ol'Oti:)
, :'J3J~~~J:U~Jm~e4
~
~
~,
'"
"
~
""
~ liD
lO'
Y:Aootllll
flP,' '~5S(J(uto;H::liri~b~) ,', 'i'"
:StandiJd:Peneuatr&l :Tes1 AsrM lJ,.l~l!6
3'itlchl,':$
,O?
14-} 6
!!!
a;
t)~
Q) C
'- 0
o ,_
~ -
lLO
.?;>-6
,- 0
~ ~
Q)lL
.~ en
C C
::):0:::::;
en
.~ .x
Oiw
:2'0
Q)
Q)-
> 0
<{~
Q)
rJ)
~o
..,..?;>
~Q) 76
_ :J
.00
'" ~
I-- Q)
CO
~
CD
a;
~
10
a;
~
..,.
a;
~
M
a;
~
N
a;
~
~
a;
~
a;
>
Q)
E...J
:Jc:
,s g!
x ,-
'" E
:2 '"
c:
o
o
10
~
<ri
~
~
Q)
.,
E
'"
~
'"
lL
Q)
~
.au;
'" :J
~ ,-
"-..... Q) en
2Q.lQ.m
'" Q) EO
~!::.~--
a;~
>rJ)
Q)...J
...Jra
10
<ri
N
10
N
~
<ri
N
10
<ri
N
co
..j
N
N
..,.
N
2'
I .~
a.
13
.e
I'-
r-.:
co
I'-
r-.:
..,.
r-.:
10
r-.:
I'-
r-.:
.?;>-
'> E
,_ 0
Ow
:J 0
'0 ..<:::
C E
o :J
0_
M
10
0>
~
CD
CD
0>
I'-
co
N
I'-
co
N
I'-
I'-
N
CD
co
~
~
N
M
N
M
10
M
..,.
M
0>
N
co
10
N
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
co
~
{g;::::-Q).-,t3J.-
'C - 10:::::: ro::::::
o Oll:; C> ~ en
:cE,-E:JE
O-Z-cn-
~
..,.
...J
o
ra
co
I'-
I'-
M
co
~
...J
o
ra
co
10
N
en
~:::::-
c-
'O0l
~ E
"'-
I
co
I'-
N
co
I'-
M
co
0>
N
co
CO
M
co
..,.
N
co
..,.
M
E
:J
'0
ro
O-Q)-
:::::: "'C::::::
- en -.:: 0)
::l E 'S E
Q)-rJ)-
C
'0
~
'"
I
co
co
N
co
..,.
N
co
CO
M
co
co
N
co
10
N
co
CO
N
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
...J
o
ra
en
:Q
'0
rJ)_
'0""
Q)0l
> E
'0-
en
en
is
co
co
10
co
CO
M
co
CO
..,.
co
..,.
..,.
co
N
..,.
co
I'-
M
co
CO
10
E_
:J""
,- Ol
.l2 E
"'-
o
co
~
~
CO
~
I'-
0>
..,.
M
o
co
N
~
"!
M
co
~
~
CD
N
co
CO
~
..,.
N
o
~
CO
...J
o
ra
'"
CO
C~
2 "'E
-.:;
I'-
f')
I
"'"
....
8e
-
Q) E
~::J
't: C
:J 0
U)u
'0 Q)
:iiGi
...Jo
~ ~
o 0
Q)Q)
rara
rJ)...J
...Jo
rara
Table 14B.. 2, Ave Maria University Project
Well 2 Sampling Results
~8C
Well 2 Well 2 Well 2
Parameter 5/6/03 6/10103 7/15/03
Water Level 16.15 5,9 4.59
(Feet BLS)
Temperature 24,8 25.4 25,1
(Celsius)
pH 7.5 7,9 8.4
(std. units)
Conductivity 720 737 714
(umhos/em)
Chloride 34 34 35
~I)
Nitrate BDL 0.16 <0.05
(mq/I)
Sulfate 18 20.6 20
(mglll
Hardness 300 314 350
(rT1QIl)
Hardness, Calcium 250 - 320
-.i~)
Sulfide BDL 1,02 <1.0
-.LrT1QIl)
Dissolved Solids 420 440 430
(mg/l)
Calcium 100 98.4 100
(mglll
Iron 0,24 5,12 0,19
(rT1QIl)
Aluminum .. 0,07 ..
(mq/I)
Barium .. 0.03
(mg/l)
Boron .. 0,063 ..
(malll
Color .. 155,6 40
(CU)
Fluoride .. BDL 0,23
-.Lmalll
Potassium .. 5,62 .
(mg/l)
Magnesium .. 19,2 16
(mq/I)
Manganese -- 0,17 ..
(malll
Sodium .. 24,1 24
-.imall)
Ammonia - 0,73 0.59
(mg/l)
Nitrite .. 0.021 <0.05
-.ima/l)
Silica, dissolved .. 13.3 14
(mgll as SiO,)
Strontium -- 0.14 ..
-.Lmqll)
Alkalinity. Total .. 296 290
(mg/l as CaCO,)
Total Organic 13 15
Carbon ..
-.imall)
14-~
"sc
QUESTION 15 - SOILS
A,1, Provide a description of each of the soils indicated on Map E utilizing the following
format:
Table 15.A-1 provides a list of soil map units present on Town of Ave Maria site. Please
refer to Map E for the location of soil map units delineated by the NRCS (formerly known as
SCS). Based upon the presence or absence of each soil map unit on the local NRCS
hydric soil list, approximately 79 percent of the Town of Ave Maria site contains non-hydric
soils,
Table 15.A-1
Soil Description and Interpretations
Soil Name Depth to Seasonal High Degree & Degree & Kind
and Map Brief Soil Description Rock Water Table Penneability Kind of of Limitation
Depth Duration Rate Limitation for for pond
Symbol (inches) (feet) month) (in/hour) low buildinlls embankments
Holopaw fine Nearly level. poorly
sand. drained soil in sloughs June- Severe Severe
limestone and broad drainages, 50-80 0-1,0 0,2-2,0 (cutbanks cave,
substratum Slopes are smooth and Nov, (wetness) wetness)
(#2) range from 0 to 2%,
Malabar fine Nearly level, poorly
drained soil in sloughs Severe
sand and broad drainages, >60 0-1,0 June- <0,06-0,2 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Nov, (wetness)
(#3) Slopes are smooth and wetness)
range from 0 to 2%,
Immokalee Nearly level, poorly Severe
fine sand drained soil on flatwoods. >60 0-1,0 June- 0,6-2,0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Slopes range from 0 to Nov, (wetness) wetness)
(#7) 2%.
Oldsmar fine Nearly level, poorly
sand. drained soil on broad, Severe
limestone nearly level sloughs, 60-72 0-1,0 June- 0,06-2,0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
substratum Slopes are smooth to Oct, (wetness) wetness)
concave and range from 0
(#10) to 2%
Oldsmar fine Nearly level, poorly Severe
sand drained soil on flatwoods, >60 0-1,0 June. <0,06-0,2 Severe (cutbanks cave,
Slopes are smooth and Feb, (wetness) wetness)
(#16) range from 0 to 2%,
Basinger fine Nearly level, poorly
drained soil in sloughs June- Severe Severe
sand and broad drainages. >60 0-1,0 Feb, 6,0-20 (wetness) (cutbanks cave.
(#17) Slopes range from 0 to wetness)
2%.
Boca fine Nearly level. poorly Severe
sand drained soil on f1atwoods. 24-40 0-1,0 June- 0,6-2,0 Severe (cutbanks cave.
Slopes range from 0 to Oct, (wetness) wetness)
(#21) 2%.
7/23/2004- 135526 Ver: 01!. MPERRY
CA'.o
1l3786-013-000-PDRI_28423
15-1
Soil Name Depth to Seasonal High Degree & Degree & Kind
and Map Brief Soil Description Rock Water Table Permeability Kind of of Limitation
Depth Duration Rate Limitation for for pond
Symbol (inches) (feell month) (in/hour) low buildings embankments
Chobee. Severe Severe
Winder. and Level. very poorly drained (wetness) (cutbanks cave.
Gator soils, soil in depressions and >60 +2-1,0 June- <0,06-0,2 ponding)
marshes, Slopes are 0- Dee, Gator soil:
depressional 1%. ponding. Gator: excess
(#22) subsidence humus
Holopaw and Severe Severe
Okeelanta Level. very poorly drained (ponding) (cutbanks cave,
soils, soil in depressions and >60 +2-1,0 June- 0,2-2,0 ponding)
marshes, Slopes are 0- April Okeelanta
depressional 1%. soil: ponding. Okeelanta:
(#23) subsidence excess humus
Boca. Boca:
Riviera, 24-40 June-
limestone Level. very poorly drained Boca: Feb, Boca: 0,6-2,0
Severe
substratum, soil in depressions, Riviera: +2,0 Riviera: 0.2- Severe (cutbanks cave.
and cypress swamps, and 40-70 6,0
Others: ponding)
Copeland marshes, Slopes are 0- Copeland: July-April Copeland: (ponding)
fine sands, 1%. 20-50 +2,1,0 for 0.2-0,6
depressional Copeland
(#25)
Holopaw fine Nearly level, poorly drained Severe
sand soil in sloughs and broad >60 0-1.0 June- 0,2-2,0 Severe (cutbanks cave,
drainages, Slopes range Nov, (wetness) wetness)
(#27) from Oto2%
Winder, Winder: June- Winder:
Riviera,
limestone Level. very poorly drained >60 Dec. <0,06-0,2 Severe
substratum, soil in depressions and Riviera: +2-1.0 Chobee: Severe (cutbanks cave.
and Chobee marshes, Slopes are 0- 40-70 June- <0,06-0,2 (ponding) ponding)
soils, 1%. Chobee: Feb, for Riviera: 0.2-
depressional >60 Riviera 6,0
(#43)
8 Cij~ ..
Source: Florida, Natural resources Conservation Service, U,S,
A.2. Describe the potential for subsidence and any unique geologic features (such as
sand dunes, bluffs, sinkholes, springs, steepheads, etc.) on the site. Discuss what
aspects of the site plan will be used to compensate for or take advantage of these
features.
No unique geological features are present on the Town of Ave Maria site, No known areas
susceptible to subsidence are located on the site, "Subsidence" limitations noted for low
buildings in Table 15.A-1 are associated exclusively with muck soils present on the site,
The muck material has a maximum thickness of 6-12 inches, and is easily removed and
backfilled where necessary,
7/2312004.135526 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
,~
0371l6-013-00Q..-PDRI_28423
15-2
'aG
B. Where a soil presents a limitation to the type of use proposed in the development,
state how the limitation will be overcome. Specify construction methods that would
be used for building, road and parking lot foundations, and for lake or canal bank
stabilization as relevant
According to the Soil Survey of Collier County, prepared by the USDA Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS), the Town of Ave Maria contains soils that are common to
Collier County, It should be noted that despite limitations associated with wetness,
approximately 80% of the site contains soils listed as non-hydric on the NRCS local
hydric soil list. As in other county developments, soil limitations or hazards (e,g"
wetness, ponding, subsidence in organic soil materials) will be considered and generally
overcome by use of compacted fill. As noted in the response question to 15,A.2, any
areas of shallow muck (6-12 inches thick) will be removed and backfilled with suitable
compacted fill materials, Water management lakes will have banks designed and graded
to prevent erosion and to facilitate revegetation in locations where steep banks are
necessary, bulkheads or retaining walls will be used. Existing soil drainage
characteristics will be considered in design of water management systems,
c. What steps will be taken during site preparation and construction to prevent or
control wind and water soil erosion? Include a description of proposed plans for
clearing and grading as related to erosion control,
Erosion control plans are being submitted with the ERP permits, employing best
management practices, Areas under construction on the Town of Ave Maria will be
surrounded by silt fences, and existing canals will possess turbidity barriers.
Construction areas will frequently watered to control wind erosion and fugitive dust.
After earth-moving activities are completed, bare soil will be immediately sodded,
hydroseeded, etc, to provide vegetative cover that will minimize erosion from wind and
water.
D. To what degree and in what location(s) will the development site be altered by fill
material? If known, specify the source location and composition of the fill. Also
identify the disposal location for any overburden or spoil.
Geotechnical soil borings indicate a 40-50 foot thickness of suitable fill materials (fine sand
and limestone) on site, and lakes may be excavated to a maximum depth of 35 feet.
Therefore, most or all of the fill material will be obtained from the on-site lake excavations.
If any excess overburden or spoil exists at the end of construction, it will be used for top
dressing of filled areas and/or berm enhancements.
712312004_ 135526 Va" 01 r. MPERRY
-
03786-0n.ooo..PDRI.28423
15-3
'""Be
-
QUESTION 16 - FLOODPLAINS
A. Identify any pre- and post-development flood prone areas.
The project site is included in Florida Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel No. 120067
0275 D, The project site is currently located in an area that FEMA has designated as
Zone D (an area in which flood hazards have not been determined),
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has staff gauges located within
Camp Keais Strand (the receiving water for the project) which record the surface water
stage elevation within the strand on a daily basis, The surface water management
system for the developed site will be designed based upon the anticipated receiving
water elevations, the amount of surface water storage provided in the proposed lakes at
the site, and the peak allowable discharge rate for the developed site, Per the
requirements of Collier County and SFWMD, the minimum road elevations within the site
will be established at or above the peak stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day Storm in the
developed site and the minimum finished floor elevations within the site will be
established at or above the peak stage of the 1 00 Year - 3 Day Storm with Zero
Discharge from the development to the offsite receiving waters, The surface water
management design and the minimum required elevations for the roads and finished
floors will be reviewed and approved by both Collier County and SFWMD,
B. Is any development proposed within a 1 OO-year flood prone area as identified by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency? If so, indicate the appropriate Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) zone designations and their locations, etc.
The proposed development is not located within a FEMA flood prone area. The project
site is included in Florida Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel No, 1200670275 D and is
located in an area that FEMA currently has designated as Zone D (an area in which
flood hazards have not been determined), FEMA is proposing that the Eastern Lands of
Collier County be designated as "Un-numbered A Zones," meaning that the site would
be considered to be within an area inundated by the 100 Year Flood, but without a
determined flood elevation, The County is currently conducting a study in other areas of
Collier County to address FEMA mapping, Collier County has been asked to include this
project in the ongoing study in order to request a map revision which would designate a
100 Year flood zone elevation at the Ave Maria project site,
c. If any structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within the post-development
100-year flood prone area, identify their location and indicate what measures will be
taken to mitigate the potential flood hazard and to maintain the 100-year floodplain
storage volume.
The proposed development will occur in agricultural areas that are outside of the 100 Year
- 3 Day flood plain and will not result in the remove of storage volume from the 100 year
floodplain,
-"1312004- 135531 Ver. 011. MPERRY
76&-013-00Q...O
16-1
""ae
D. Discuss any potential increases in the off-site flooding due to the development of
this project.
No potential increases in off-site flooding are anticipated from the development of this
project.
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
What is the developer's source and methodology used to derive flood prone area
information? Has the developer sought the best available information from counties, cities,
water management districts, etc, (in addition to, or in lieu of, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency data), relative to flood prone areas.
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) has staff gauges located within Camp
Keais Strand (the receiving water for the project) which record the surface-water stage elevation
within the strand on a daily basis, The stage information provided from the gauges within the
Camp Keais Strand indicates that the portions of the project proposed for development are
outside of the 100 year floodplain, The data available from the gauges was verified in the field
using hydro-biological indicators and staining information adjacent to each of the gauges,
-"'312004- 135531 V'l[: 01!_ MPERRY
'86-013-000--0
16-2
rac
QUESTION 17 - WATER SUPPLY
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 110 gallons per capita per day
Existing Level of Service: Not Applicable
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 110 gallons per capita per day
A.1. Provide a projection ofthe average daily potable and non-potable water demands at
the end of each phase of development. If significant seasonal demand variations
will occur, discuss anticipated peaks and duration. Use the format below:
Phase
Table 17.A-1
Potable/Non-Potable Water Demand
Potable Water Non-Potable Water Demand (MGD)
Demand (MGD) Irrigation
o 11,07
Existing
Phase 1 3,5 8.2
Buildout (Phase 2) 6.4 5,8'
, Demand will be met using reclaimed wastewater generated within the DR!.
A.2. Describe how this demand information was generated, including the identification of
the consumption rates assumed in the analysis.
The average daily potable water demand for each phase of the DRI is presented below
in Table 17.A-2, In predicting these demands, it was assumed that the potable water
demand would be 110% of wastewater generated, Wastewater generation and the
corresponding water demand was estimated in accordance with the standards
established in FAC Chapter 64E,008,
Non-potable demands are based upon the estimated landscaped areas of each land use
proposed at the Ave Maria site. A summary of the estimated irrigated acreage for
various land uses at the Ave Maria DRI is listed in Table17.A-3. It is anticipated that 1
to 2 inches of irrigation water will be required per week. Irrigation water for Ave Maria
will be provided from reclaimed water generated by the advanced secondary wastewater
treatment plant, as it is available, Additional irrigation water sources will be surface
water in stormwater management ponds andlor ground water wells drilled into the Lower
Tamiami aquifer, Initial irrigation demands will be satisfied using groundwater (permitted
through SFWMD) while the growth of the town increases to the point of generating
enough reclaimed water to meet the town's irrigation demands,
Irrigation system will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of irrigation water
during times when it is not needed, The quantity of water required for irrigation at the
end of Phase 2 will be approximately half of what is currently being used by existing
agriculture.
-"'312004- 135531 Var. 011. MPERRY
66-013-000--0
17-1
" 8e
Source/Housing Type
Table 17 .A-2
Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands
Units Projected Units Flow
2011 2016 (gpd/unit)
6,010 11,000 550
367,900 690,000 0,20
276,600 510,000 0.20
110 400 146
15,000 35,000 0,20
115,500 148,500 0.20
Unit
Fe
Fe
Room
Fe
Fe
Average Flow (gpd)
2011 2016
3,305,500 6,050,000
72,844 136,620
54,767 100,980
16,093 58,520
2,970 6,930
22,869 29,403
3,475,043 6,382,453
Residential
Retail
Office
Hotel
Medical
Civic (Miscellaneous)
Total
Table 17.A-3
Estimated Irrigated Acreage
Phase 1
Phase 1 Phase 2 % Irrigated Acres Phase 2
Ave Maria DRI Land Use Acres Acres IRRIGATED Irrigated Acres
University 467 849 30 140 255
Residential 1,371 2,492 40 548 997
Mixed 180 328 30 54 98
Community 116 211 30 35 63
Wetland Preserve 34 62
Park 34 61 75 26 46
Lakes 413 750
Roads 133 242 20 23 48
Totals: 2,748 4,995 34 826 1,507
Average Day Use (MGD) 3.2 5,8
The irrigation demands were calculated using the modified Blaney-Criddle method for
determining crop irrigation needs. The calculations incorporated a 1-in-10 annual
supplemental crop requirement for grass, a 0.4 soil type, and an irrigation efficiency of
77%,
B. Provide a breakdown of sources of water supply, both potable and non-potable, by
development phase through project completion. Use the format below.
Nonpotable Water Source
The nonpotable water needs at the Ave Maria site will be met by reclaimed water as
available, and groundwater sources of supply, Groundwater from the Lower Tamiami
aquifer will be pumped from wells into non-potable pipeline systems which will discharge
into several irrigation lakes for irrigation distribution. The groundwater supply wells for
irrigation are planned for in Section 5, Township 48 South, Range 29 East.
^'--1I~3-1~3_10 Vaf' 01!-MPERRY 17-2
8e
III
1-
C. If water wells exist on-site, locate them on Map H and specify those that will continue
to be used. Also locate on Map H all proposed on-site wells. (For residential
developments, if individual wells for each lot are proposed, simply indicate the
number of units to be served, general locations, and any plans for eventual phase-
out.) Indicate the diameter, depth, and pumping rates (average and maximum) for
each of the existing wells and project this information for the proposed wells (for
lots served by individual wells, this information may be grouped for projection
purposes). Also provide a breakdown of the wells with regard to potable and non-
potable sources.
Existing on-site wells are shown in Figure 17.C-1 and known well data are given in
Table 17.C-1, Existing wells are currently used for agricultural irrigation, The
agricultural wells located on the project site will be properly plugged and abandoned by a
licensed drilling contractor.
The proposed wellfield will consist of wells withdrawing from the Lower Tamiami aquifer,
with wells located in Sections 5 and 8, Township 48 South, Range 29 East. For initial
water use permitting purposes, six Lower Tamiami aquifer production wells are
proposed, The production wells will be 10 to 12-inch in diameter, cased to
approximately 70 feet, with a total depth of approximately 120 feet. The pumping rate is
expected to range from 500 to 700 gpm.
D. If on-site water wells are used, will this result in interference with other water wells or
result in adverse impacts to underlying or overlying aquifers? Document the
assumptions underlying this response.
New on-site wells will be drilled to supply potable water demands and to supplement
reclaimed water supplies, The proposed Ave Maria DRI is located on land that is
currently permitted for agricultural irrigation water use. The existing agricultural
operations are permitted to withdraw from the water table and Lower Tamiami aquifers,
The proposed maximum day withdrawals for potable supply and irrigation use will be
significantly less than the agricultural maximum day withdrawals currently permitted at
the site, The proposed project will utilize the Lower Tamiami aquifer for potable uses
and will utilize reclaimed water and the Lower Tamiami aquifer for irrigation uses.
There are no documented adverse impacts occurring as a result of the existing
agricultural withdrawals, The final combined PWS (6.4 MGD) and irrigation demands
(5,8 MGD), less reclaimed water supply (5.8 MGD) is anticipated to be 6.4 MGD, or
approximately 42% less than the currently permitted allocation (See Table 17 .A-1). The
impacts associated with groundwater pumpage should therefore be reduced by a similar
amount. The SFWMD Lower West Coast Plan (April 2000), which is the District's
assessment of water demands and sources, indicated no adverse impacts associated
with current and future projected agricultural use, The proposed reduction in maximum
day use will reduce the potential for adverse impacts to occur as a result of groundwater
withdrawals at Ave Maria.
-'112004-135531 Va" 01!-MPERRY
B6-01J-OOO..O
17-3
~8C
''<'1<'_
E. Who will operate and maintain the internal water supply system after completion of
the development?
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP, a private utility company, will operate and maintain the
internal water supply system after completion of the development. A copy of a letter
from the utility company committing service availability is attached (Attachment 17.E-1).
F.1. If an off-site water supply is planned, attach a letter from the agency or firm
providing service outlining:
No off-site water supply is required for this DR!.
(a) the projected excess capacities of the water supply facilities to which
connection will be made at present and for each phase through completion of
the project,
Not applicable,
(b) any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity,
Not applicable,
(c) a statement of the agency or firm's ability to provide services at all times
during and after development. (This agency must be supplied with the water
demand and supply tables in paragraphs A and B above),
Not applicable,
F.2. If service cannot be provided at all times during and after development, identify the
required capital improvements, timing, cost, and proposed responsible entity for
each phase in which service is unavailable,
Service will be provided at all times during and after development by Ave Maria Utility
Company, LLLP.
G. Please describe any water conservation methods or devices incorporated into the
plan of development. What percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional
plans?
Water saving plumbing devices will be used as required by the current building code.
Irrigation system will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of irrigation water
during times when it is not needed. The quantity of water required for irrigation will be
less than what is currently being used by existing agriculture,
H. Indicate whether proposed water service will be provided within an established
service area boundary.
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP will provide service within the Town of Ave Maria DRI
boundary,
lJ2004- 135531 Var: 01!. MPERRY
>6-013-000--0
17-4
8e
-"~
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
1. With regard to existing public utilities, the applicant should provide a projection of
average daily potable demands, by phases. The source (utility) should be specified
and a commitment should be provided which specifies: the current pumpage, the
current commitments and the excess capacity (in MGD).
Newly created Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP, established specifically for this DRI, will
provide water, wastewater and reclaimed water to the Town, There are no current
pumpage or current commitments other than those oommitments required by the Town,
Service capacities are being planned in accordance with FDEP regulations and will exceed
the phased demands required by the Town.
2. If wells are to be used (existing or new), on-site or off-site (but not as part of an
existing utility) the list of additional data frequently contains requests such as:
a. Aquifer performance characteristics, if the proposed source is groundwater
The aquifer performance characteristics are outlined in Question 14, Water,
b. Water availability analysis if the proposed source is surface water
The proposed source is not surface water.
c. Wellfield location and well design information (diameter, depth, pumping
rates)
This information is not currently available,
d. Impacts on other existing users
Existing irrigated agriculture fields will be removed in the process of developing The
Town of Ave Maria, The SFWMD Lower West Coast Plan (April 2000), which is the
District's assessment of water demands and sources, indicated no adverse impacts
associated with current and future projected agricultural use, The proposed
reduction in permitted allocation will reduce the potential for adverse impacts to
occur.
e. Impacts on environmentally sensitive lands (wetlands)
The proposed withdrawal facilities will be located to minimize potential impacts.
Facilities will be located, designed and operated in such a way that they will not
degrade the ambient surface or groundwater quality, and will not adversely
impact any adjacent FSA, HSA, WRA, or conservation areas.
'312004- 135531 Ver: 01'- MPERRY
'86-013-000--0
17-5
8e
3. Provide a plan for obtaining non-potable irrigation water supply from recycled
effluent; or if effluent will not be available, provide a non-potable water use plan
showing conservation measures that will be taken to reduce the demand.
Ave Maria is designed to utilize recycled effluent (reclaimed water) as a primary irrigation
water supply, Shortages of reclaimed water will be supplemented by water stored in
stormwater management ponds and/or ground water wells drilled into the Lower
Tamiami aquifer. Initial irrigation demands will be satisfied using groundwater (permitted
through SFWMD) while the growth of the town increases to the point of generating
enough wastewater to meet the town's irrigation demands,
4. Describe the methods used in developing per-capita and all other potable and non-
potable water demands and projections for demands,
Both potable water and wastewater flows were estimated per FAC Chapter 64E.008 with
potable water demand projected to be 110% of wastewater generation,
5, Relative to the total water demands for the proposed development, what impacts will
these demands have upon the regional water resources because of on-site water
development?
Overall water demands will be less because the agricultural current land use has greater
water needs when compared on an area (per acre) basis.
6. If total water demands are to be supplied by off-site sources, through a regional
water supply, private water utility, or public utility system, what are the projected
capabilities of that source to supply the required water demands at build out?
This question is not applicable because water demands will not be supplied by off-site
sources.
7, If a structural water facility modification would be required by an off-site water
supplier to meet these demands, what alternatives are now being sought and what
are the anticipated regional impacts as a result of the additional demands on the
resource?
This question is not applicable because water demands will not be supplied by off-site
sources,
8. What plans are proposed for effecting water conservation in all aspects of the
proposed development? This should include the use of lowest quality of water for
irrigation andlor industrial needs, water conserving plumbing fixtures, etc. What
percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional daily water use estimates if
conservation plans are implemented?
Low volume plumbing fixtures will be used to current building code standards and
reclaimed wastewater (effluent) will be used to supplement irrigation demands,
-"'312004-13.'>531 Vor: 01'- MPERRY
'86-013-00()...O
17-6
[(
ww [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [(
~Ul [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( Q:; [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [(
3:::J
WI
Ulb::Z '<t CD ..... N '<t 00 It) CD '" 00 N ~ '" It) '" '<t '<t '" N N Ol 0 CD 0 00 ..... ~ 0 0
<l: i'= '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t It) '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t It) CD '<t It) '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t It) It)
UW
0
-,I
-'I-:;: N '" It) Ol 00 00 CD It) ~ '" '<t CD N 00 ..... Ol CD ..... '<t N ~ '" CD 0 '" 00 ~ 0 0
WQ.4:'
3:~::: ..... ..... ..... It) CD ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CD CD ..... CD CD CD CD CD ..... ..... ..... ..... CD 00 ..... CD ..... 00 00
>-
Q.t:~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::JQ. 0 00 0 It) Ol CD 0 Ol CD Ol Ol 0 0 Ol Ol 00 0 00 00 00 00 '<t 00 0 00 00 Ol '" '"
Q.<l: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U
[(
W
I-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~" 0 00 0 Lri Ol CD 0 Ol CD Ol Ol 0 c.; ci Ol 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 Ol '" '"
::f-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
Q.w Z [( [( ~ [( ~ ~ [( ~ ~ ~ ~ [( ~ ~ ~ [( ~ [( ~ [( <0 ~ [( ~ ~ ~ [( [(
~Q. W ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J
::J>- U l- I- Z I- Z Z I- Z Z Z Z I- Z Z Z I- Z I- Z I- Ul Z I- Z Z Z l- I-
Q.I-
W
(9 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~
Z ci ci ci Ol Ol ci ci ci ci ci Ol ci Ol Ol Ol ci ci ci Ol Ol ci ci ci Ol ci ci Ol Ol Ol
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
.
oj zQ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0
~ 3:- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
OI '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t
I-Ul
Q)
>
Z[(
OW
Q) -<0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD ..... ..... .....
'" I-~ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~::J
8 UlZ
- -'w
oj 0 N '" It) CD ..... 00 Ol ~ <l: '"
-'~ ~ N '" '<t It) ~ N '" ,. It) '" ,. It) CD ..... 00 Ol ~ ~ ~
'" ~ , , . , . , , , .
W<l: , , , , , . ro . , , . . , , , CD CD CD CD CD CD CD . ,.:. ..... .....
Q) 3:z ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol cf, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~
~ ~
bJl
S Ow [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [( [(
- ZUl ~ (9 C> C> C> C> C> C> C> (9 C> C> C> C> C> C> ~ C> C> C> C> ~ C> C> C> ~ C> C> C>
'"
>< :)::J <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: <l:
. 1-[( 3: ~ ~ ~ 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: ~ ~ ~ 3: 3: 3: 3: 3: ~ ~ 3: 3: ~ ~ 3: ~ ~ ~ 3:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
-w CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD
~<O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[(~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W::J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q.z , , , , , , . , . , , , , . , , , , , . , , , , , . , , ,
oj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
o
::;E
<
"0
p...
:::::
is
~
~
U
r--
~
;0
E-<
~8C
.....
I
.....
.-<
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
!;j;cn 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: Q:; 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: Q:; 0::
$:J
WI
cnti:~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<{u..i'= an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an an
00
-,I
-'f-:;:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wn.o::
$~:::: CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
>-
n.t:", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~Oj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:J<{ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
n.n. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<{
0
0::
W 0
f-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE C! C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! 0 0 0 0 C! 0 0 C! C! 0 C! C! C! 0
~o '" '" '" '" oj oj oj '" '" '" oj oj oj '" '" oj oj oj oj '" oj oj '" '" oj '" '" '" oj
::f-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
n.w 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~n. :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J
~~ f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f-
W
(!) 0 0 0 0 C! 0 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 0 C! 0 0 0 C! 0 0 C! C! 0 C! 0 C!
Z 0; 0; 0; 0; Ol 0; 0; 0; 0; Ol Ol Ol 0; 0; 0; 0; Ol 0; 0; 0; Ol 0; 0; Ol Ol 0; Ol 0; Ol
;? N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
,
zn. 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! C! 0 0 0 C! C! 0 0 C! C! C! 0 C! 0 0 C! C! C!
$- cO cO cO CO CO CO cO cO cO CO CO CO cO cO cO CO CO cO cO CO CO CO cO CO cO cO CO CO CO
OI ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
f-cn
ZO::
OW
-co r- r- r- r- r- CD r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- CD r- r- r- r- r- r-
f-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
fib
(/)Z
-'w 't an CD r- CO Ol 0 ~ N '" ... an CD "- CO Ol 0 ~ N '" ... an CD r- CO Ol 0 ~ N
-'~ , , , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N '" '" '"
w<{ r- r- r- r- r- r- , , , , , ,..:. ,..:. ,..:. ,..:. , , , , , , , ,..:. , , ,..:. , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r- r- r- r- "- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r-
$Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
z(/) (!) (!) ~ ~ (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) ~ (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) ~ (!) (!) (!) ~ (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
~:J <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{ <{
f-O:: ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ $ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ $ ~
, , , , , , , , , , ,
-w <D <D <D CD <D CD <D <D CD CD CD <D <D CD CD <D <D <D CD <D CD <D CD <D CD CD <D CD <D
~co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o::~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W:J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n.z , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-d
0)
@
".g
o
U
-
u
.....
-
0)
:g
E-<
rac
co
I
.....
,....,
0:
ww 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
!;;:Ul 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
5::>
wI
Ulli::~ 0 0 N '" N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
<(uj:t: Il) Il) ... ... ... Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) Il) ~ ~ ~ ... Il) Il) ~ ... CD CD CD CD CD CD
00
-,I
-'f-"" 0 0 ..... ~ O'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O'l 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wo..<::: 0 0 0 Il)
5~'=- OJ OJ CD ..... CD OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ N N N CD OJ OJ N CD OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ
>-
o..G'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::<<(] 0 0 0 0 0 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 0 0 0 0 OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::>0.. '" '" O'l OJ OJ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 OJ '" '" N O'l OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ
0..<( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
0:
w
f-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
::<" M M O'l cO cO M M '" '" M '" M '" '" M 0 N N cO M '" M O'l N N N N N N
:'!-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
o..w 0: 0: "f Z Z 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: ~ 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
::<0.. ::> ::> w w ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::> ::>
~~ f- f- Z 0 0 f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- f- Z f- f- f- f- f- f- f-
w
C> ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0
Z O'l ci ci O'l O'l ci ci ci O'l ci O'l ci O'l O'l ci ci ci O'l ci ci O'l ci ci O'l ci ci O'l O'l ci
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
.
Zo.. 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0
5- cO OJ OJ OJ cO OJ OJ cO cO cO OJ cO cO cO OJ OJ cO cO OJ OJ cO OJ OJ ....: ....: ..... ....: ..... ....:
OI ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
f-Ul
ZO:
ow
-00 ..... ..... OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ CD CD CD ..... OJ OJ ~ ~ N N N N
f-::< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O'l ~ ~ ~ O'l '" '" '" '" '" '"
&b
UlZ
-'w '" ;;l; <( <( <( N '" "'i CD ..... "? O'l 0 ~ N ~ ... 0 N ~ Il)
-'::< '" ~ N '" , . . , , ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ , , cO N N '" ... Il) CD .....
W<( . . cO , , OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ cO . , CD CD . , ..... OJ , CD CD CD CD CD CD
..... ..... OJ OJ OJ OJ CD O'l O'l
5Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ow 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
ZUl C> C> C> C> ~ C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> ~ C> C> C> C> C>
:)::> <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <(
f-O: 5 5 5 ~ 5 5 5 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 5 5 ~ ~ 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~
. , , , , , , , , , . , ,
-w CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::<00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD CD CD CD CD CD
0:::< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w::> 0 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 0 9 0 0
o..z , , , . , . , , , , , , , , , . , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.,j
.,
'"
.5
1:1
o
u
-
u
.....
-
.,
:g
f-<
Be
'"
I
.....
...;
rsc
-d
"
g
.~
o
U
0:
UJUJ 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
~'" 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
:s:::::>
UJI
"'li:z 0 0 '" N ~ ;?; Ol ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO '<t 0 0 0
~ ;:t:; CO CO CO CO CO '" CO CO '" CO
uUJ
0
::J~~ 0 0 ..... '" '" N 0 '" <Xl <Xl <Xl
UJll;!S <Xl <Xl <Xl '" '" ..... <Xl ..... <Xl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" ..... 0 0 0
:s:~
>-
a.C- 0 0 0 0 0
:<Uj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::::>~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a. a. <Xl <Xl CO <Xl <Xl <Xl Ol CO <Xl <Xl ~ <Xl ~ ~ <Xl <Xl ~ <Xl Ol Ol <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl <Xl ~ '" <Xl
~
U
0:
UJ
1-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UJE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
:<0 N N to to to to oi to to to ci to ci ci <Xl '" ci to Ol Ol '" to to to '" <Xl 0 '" to
~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
a.UJ 0: 0: Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z
:<a. ::::> ::::> UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
1[~ l- I- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
UJ
C) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~
Z Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol oi Ol Ol oi oi oi oi Ol Ol oi oi oi oi oi Ol
~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
,
Za. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~
:s:- ..... ..... <Xl '" '" <Xl '" <Xl <Xl '" '" '" <Xl <Xl <Xl to to to to to to to <Xl ..... ,...: ,...: ,...: ,...: .....
OI '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t
1-'"
ZO:
OUJ
-CO N ~ ~ ~ N '" '" '"
1-:< '" '" CO CO '" '" '" '" '<t CO '" '" '" '" '" '" '<t '<t '<t '<t '" '<t CO '" '" '" '" '" '"
~::::>
",Z
-'UJ
-':< <Xl ~ CO '" CO ..... '" ~ '<t ..... Ol 0 N '<t '" '" ..... <Xl Ol 0 N '" '" N '" '<t <Xl Ol 0
UJ~ CO CO ~ ~ N N N '" '" ~ ~ N N N N N '" '" '" '<t '" '" ~ ~
:s:z
OUJ 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0: 0:
Z'" C) C) C) C> C> C> C) C) C> C> C) C) C> C) C> C> ~ ~ ~ C) C> C> C> C> ~ C> C) C> C>
~::::> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1-0: 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F :s: :s: :s: :s: :s: :s: :s: 3F :s: 3F :s: :s: :s: :s: 3F 3F 3F
, . , , , , , , , , , ,
-UJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:<CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO lD lD lD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO lD CO CO CO CO
0::< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UJ::::> 0 0 0 0 0 0 <;> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <;> <;> <;> <;> 0 0 0 0 <;> <;> <;> <;> 0
a.Z , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , . , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o
.....
I
,....
.....
-
,
U
,....
-
"
:g
E-<
~8C
-d
Q)
s
-.g
o
U
0::
ww 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
!;j:en 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
~::>
WI
enh:~ N 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0
~W::: LD CO CO
00
...JI
_Jf- Z .... ..... 0
Wc..<l=' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~'= CO ..... ~
>-
c..G'E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:::E~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
::>c.. ex> ex> 0 ex) ex) ex) 0 Ol Ol ex)
c..~ ~ ~
0
0::
W
I-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE 0 0 C! 0 C! 0 0 C! C! C!
:::Eo cO cO 0 cO ex> cO 0 Ol Ol ex)
:'f-- ~ ~
0
c..w z z z z z Z 0:: Z Z z
:::Ec.. w w w w w w ::> w w w
~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- 0 0 0
llJ
Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z oi oi oi en en en en en en en
~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N '"
,
Zc.. C! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C! C!
~- ..... .....: .....: cO cO cO cO cO ex> .....
OI .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
I-en
Zo::
OW
-co '" '" '" '"
I-:::E '" '" '" CO CO LD LD LD .... '"
&b
enz
...JW ~
...J:::E N '" .... Ol ~ 0 '" ~
W~ ~ CO ~ ~ ~ N N '" '" ~
~Z ~
Ow 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0::
zen Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
:)::> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1-0:: ~ ;;;: ~ ;;;: ;;;: ;;;: ;;;: ~ ~ ~
, , , , ,
-w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:::Eco CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
O:::::E N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
llJ::> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c..z , , , , , , , , , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
....
....
I
'"
....
~
U
'"
~
Q)
:g
f-;
-
({J 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet
,
00
,.... 17-1? Figure 17C-1 Map Showing Locatio~
R~.-"Ir-.,r'c..:
L., ._,
II_V!.-,
VV;L.Sor\J r/i:~i
AVE
MARIA
UTILITY
COMPANY, LLLBUN 2?
June 21, 2004
FOLDER#
8-C-.~-~ ,
Mr. Craig J, Pajer, P,E.
WilsonMiller
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
Attachment 17.E-1
Re: Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Rcquest for DR!
~ 1\." n.
vl;:af Ivll. r dJt:I:
We are responding to you your service availability request letter dated June 10,2004, Sewer and
water service for tlie referenced project is not available at this time
Ave Maria Utility Company, LLLP. (AMUC) is in the process of securing a franchise from the
Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority pursuant to Collier County Ordinance, approval of
which is expected later this year. Similarly, AMUC has also submitted to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, applications for a 1.0 mgd water and ,75 mgd wastewater treatment facility
("Phase I") located within the site location referenced above and expect approval by September 2004,
It is anticipated that AMUC will begin constructing Phase I of the facilities in November 2004
and will be complete during the timeframe of December 2005 to March 2006, The Phase I capacity of the
facilities has been designed in accordance with growth projections supplied by Ave Maria University and
New Town Development, LLLP and should provide sufficient capacity to supply the referenced property,
Connections are subject to the availability of sewage and water treatment capacity at the time formal
application is reccived, however expansions of the facilities will made based upon demands and other
binding commitments received.
Please note that any and all improvements that are constructed must be in accordance with the
AMUC Service Availability Policy and any other applicable policies, including payment of connection
fees,
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 239-262-2600,
Sincerely,
AV;;; 27!lPANY LLU
~ G~nson~e----
Project Manager
17-13
Cc; Brian Goguen
John Jenkins, P,A, (Rose, Sundstrom & Bentley)
2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKW.~Y
PHONE: 239-262-2600
NAFLES FLORID,\
F.x' 239-403-6808
"'-
8e
QUESTION 18 - WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
Existing Level of Service: Not Applicable
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 100 gallons per capita per day
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 100 gallons per capita per day
A. Provide, in the table given below, the projected wastewater generation at the end of
each phase of development and proposed wastewater treatment. Identify the
assumptions used to project this demand.
The proposed wastewater treatment plant for Ave Maria will be built in phases to meet
demands generated by the Town as shown in Table 18.A-1. The project wastewater
generation is provided below. This information was obtained from FAC Chapter
64E.008,
Table 18.A-1
Projected Wastewater Generation By Phase
On-site
Wastewater Wastewater
Phase Generation (MGD) Treatment (MGD)
Existing 0,0 0.0
Phase 1 3,2 3.2
Phase 2 (Buildout) 5,8 5.8
Off-site
Wastewater
Treatment (MGD)
0,0
0,0
0,0
B. If applicable, generally describe the volumes, characteristics and pre-treatment
techniques of any industrial or other effluents prior to discharge from proposed
industrial-related use(s),
There are no industries generating industrial wastewater planned within the Town,
C.1. If off-site treatment is planned, identify the treatment facility and attach a letter from
the agency or firm providing the treatment outlining present and projected excess
capacity of the treatment and transmission facilities through buildout, any other
commitments that have been made for this excess and a statement of ability to
provide service at all times during or after development.
Off-site treatment is not planned. All wastewater generated within the Town will be
treated within the boundary of the DR!.
-"'312004--135531 Ver: 01'- MPERRY
'66-013-000---0
18-1
8e ._~
C,2. If service cannot be provided, identify the required capital improvements, cost,
timing, and proposed responsible entity necessary to provide service at all times
during and after development.
Not applicable,
0, If septic tanks will be used on site, indicate the number of units to be served, general
locations and any plans for eventual phase-out.
The Town will be served by a centralized on-site wastewater treatment plant and
wastewater generated is anticipated to be processed by this facility. There may be remote
septic tank locations that would not be practically served by the centralized facility,
E. Indicate whether proposed wastewater service will be provided within an established
service area boundary.
Wastewater service will be provided within the established service area of the Ave Maria
DRI,
~3J2004- 135531 Var: 01'- MPERRY
'86-{)13-000--0
18-2
rac
QUESTION 19 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Existing Level of Service: Not determined (Per Collier County Growth Management Plan,
Drainage Element,as amended May 9, 2000)
Adopted Level of Service Standard: 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event
Level of Service After Project Buildout: 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event
A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any
potential flooding and erosion problems.
The Town of Ave Maria is located within the Camp Keais Strand sub-basin of the
Fakahatchee Strand Basin (watershed) as depicted within the Collier County Drainage
Atlas (January 2002), The Fakahatchee Strand Basin drains to tidal waters adjacent to
the Gulf of Mexico,
The existing infrastructure within the site includes existing farm fields, farm roads, drainage
system, and farm retention areas. The site is located between the Camp Keais Strand and
the rights-of-way of Oil Well Road, Camp Keais Road, and Immokalee Road. Existing
surface water flow patterns consist of agricultural pumpage and overland sheet flow to
the existing farm detention areas, These detention areas discharge to the Camp Keais
Strand, which then conveys the run-off south with ultimate outfall to the Gulf of Mexico.
Reference Map 1-1 for the existing drainage patterns on the site,
B, Describe the various elements of the proposed drainage system shown on Map I,
including any wetlands to be used as part of the system, and discuss the design
criteria (including stage-storage discharge assumption) to be used for the various
elements. Provide typical cross-sections (showing dimensions, slopes and control
elevations) for any proposed lakes or swales. Identify the control elevation for all
drainage structures. Include information as to what design storm will be used for
what portions of the system.
The proposed conceptual surface water management system will consist of a network of
dry pre-treatment areas, lakes, dry detention areas, culverts and water control
structures, The system will store stormwater run-off for treatment and attenuation with
controlled discharge to the existing farm detention areas, with eventual outfall to the
Camp Keais Strand, as described above,
The control elevations for the project were determined by analyzing the following data:
1, Topographic elevations at wetland jurisdictional lines
2, Hydro-biological indicators
3, Seasonal high water elevations obtained from gauges installed at the site
The control elevations for the developed portions of the site were determined through the
use of the data listed above, Particular reliance was placed upon the use of the seasonal
high water elevations obtained from the monitoring gages installed at the site and the two
~312004-135531 v~ 011 Mf>ERRY
'86-013-000-.0
19-1
""Be
SFWMD staff gauges installed within Camp Keais Strand at Oil Well Road (Keais858) and
Immokalee Road (Keais846), The seasonal high water elevations for Camp Keais Strand
were determined by evaluating water level data from the SFWMD database for both
Keais846 and Keais858 for the previous twelve wet seasons, The seasonal high water
elevation within Camp Keais Strand at Immokalee Road (SFWMD Gauge Keais846) is
20,5 feet-NGVD and the seasonal high water elevation within Camp Keais Strand at Oil
Well Road is18,7 feet-NGVD.
The control elevations for the proposed basins will range from elevation 19,0 feet-NGVD to
elevation 22.0 feet-NGVD,
C. From Map I, indicate the total number of acres in each drainage area and specify the
acreage of any portions of drainage areas outside the site boundaries. Complete the
following table for on-site drainage areas.
The table below provides an estimated land-use summary for each phase of the
development. The final developed land-uses may differ from the information in the table
based upon the types of residential, commercial, and campus uses developed and the
sequence of development. Please note that the land-uses in the table below are
conservative assumptions typically used in water management permitting in Southwest
Florida which may include increased impervious acreages as compared to the land-uses
assumed in the summary provided for the irrigated areas (which use conservative
assumptions of higher pervious areas requiring irrigation application).
ramage eas
Surface
Impervious Retention Open Space Total
Phase Surfaces (Acres) (Acres)' (Acres) (Acres)
Existing
Phase 1 1630 447 670 2747
Phase 2 1334 365 549 2248
Total 2964 812 1219 4995
Table 19.C-1
D' Ar
, Category includes lakes, ponds, storage areas, etc. Not all of the anticipated areas are depicted
on the master plan, as these facilities are anticipated within each general land use category,
D. Specify and compare the volume and quality of run-off from the site in its existing
condition to the anticipated run-off at the end of each phase of development. (The
parameters to be used to define "quality" and methodology should be agreed to by
the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the preapplication
conference stage.) Identify any changes in timing or pattern of waterflows between
pre- and post-development conditions. Indicate major points of discharge and
--"~:g;~3_10V"L01!-MPERRY 19-2
f' 8e
!JU'<.
ultimate receiving water body(ies). Indicate what provisions will be incorporated in
the design of the drainage system, including a summary description of any Best
Management Practices to be utilized, to minimize any increase in run-off from the
site and to minimize any degradation of water quality in the ultimate receiving body
over that occurring in its pre-development state,
The developed basins of the project have been restricted to a peak allowable rate of
discharge of a maximum rate of 0.15 cfs 1 acre. The peak discharge of 0.15 cfs 1 acre is the
maximum allowable for projects located in the Fakahatchee Strand Watershed per Collier
County Ordinance 90-10. The existing farm system has the capacity to discharge from the
agricultural fields at a rate of 1.0 cfs 1 acre in the existing condition; the restricted discharge
of 0.15 cfs 1 acre in the developed condition will be less than the existing discharge capacity
of the agricultural operations at the site.
E. Who will operate and maintain the drainage system after completion of the
development?
The stormwater management system will be maintained by the Ave Maria Stewardship
District andlor master homeowners associations,
From SFWMD DRI Addendum Questions:
1. The concept plan of the complete drainage system, including the method of
conveyance of runoff, proposed outfall and off-site impacts (upstream and
downstream).
The conceptual surface water management system includes lakes, storm sewers, swales
and berms, Lakes and dry detention areas will be utilized to provide all of the required
water quality storage volume and the required water quantity storage volume. Storm
sewers, swales, and overland flow will convey run-off to the storage areas, The proposed
site has been divided into drainage basins with control elevations ranging from elevation
19,0 feet-NGVD to 22.0 feet-NGVD,
The water quality volume required within each of the developed basins within the Town is
the greater of one inch of run-off over the entire basin area or 2,5 times the impervious
percentage. The required water quality volume will be met through the proposed control
structures within the developed basins of the project.
The discharge rates from the drainage basins to the existing farm detention areas or
conveyance system have been restricted to a maximum rate of 0.15 cfs 1 acre as required
by Collier County Ordinance 90-10,
2. An analysis of the drainage system response (functional capabilities) to the 25-year,
3-day storm.
The minimum road crown elevation within each of the developed basins within Town will be
established above the peak stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day Storm Event. The perimeter
berms for each of the developed basins of the project site will be set at or above the peak
stage of the 25 Year - 3 Day storm event. The minimum required finished floor elevations
--112004-135531 v...- 01LMPERRY
':16-013-000--0
19-3
~'8C
'"f;"
within each of the developed project basins will be established at or above the peak stage
of the 100 Year - 3 Day (zero discharge) storm event.
3. A breakdown of acreages: impervious, water bodies, green area, types of land use,
etc.
The plan includes typical impervious uses such as pavement, buildings, and lake areas
within the proposed residential and commercial developments, Prior to approval of the
Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) for each phase of the development by the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) a detailed land use breakdown for the phase
will be reviewed and approved by SFWMD for consistency with the surface water
management system design,
4. Stage-storage and stage-discharge information for the project.
A projection of the storm stage and storage volume relationship for the anticipated land
uses and sequence of phasing has been provided in the table below. The calculated
storage volumes shown are estimated based upon the typical land use characteristics of
development in southwest Florida, The storm stage and storage volume relationship of the
surface water management system will differ from the projection below based upon the final
design, The surface water management system will be designed to limit the discharge from
the developed system to the offsite areas to a peak rate of 0,15 cfs 1 acre (per Collier
County Ordinance 90-10) at the minimum road elevation and less than 0,15 cfs 1 acre for all
stages below the minimum road elevation,
tage torage
Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage Storage
Stage Area Volume Area Volume Area Volume
(acre) (acre-feet) (acre) (acre-feet) (acre) (acre-feet)
Phase I Phase I Phase II Phase II Build-out Build-out
Control Elev 446.6 0 365.4 0 812,0 0
(0.0)
Bottom of 480.1 463.4 392,8 379.1 873,0 842,5
Detention
(+1.0)
Top of Bank 647,8 1309,3 530,0 1071.2 1177.8 2380,5
(+2.5)
Minimum 781,9 1666.7 639,7 1363,7 1421,7 3030.4
Road Elev
(+3.0)
Table 19-4
5 IS
Typical proposed development elevations.
~"3f2()()4.135531 Va<: 01!_MPERRY
lj&.{l1J-OOO._O
19-4
~8C
-
The site has been divided into drainage areas with control elevations varying from elevation
19,5 feet-NGVD to 22.6 feet-NGVD, The minimum road elevations are typically three feet
above the basin control elevation and the minimum finished floor elevations are typically
four feet above the basin control elevation,
6. For those projects being reviewed under the Coordinated Review/Concurrent
Processing for drainage permits, the data requested for a Surface Water
Management Permit is required.
Option a,
What regional effect will post-development land use have on water table and
depression storage in comparison to pre-development storage and drainage
patterns? This should include any regional impacts to take levels or stream
flows whether regulated by SWFWMD or not.
Option b.
Not applicable.
Compare pre- and post-development hydrology and hydraulics of the
watershed (i.e., runoff characteristics, flow hydrographs, low flow, flood
elevations) and what regional effects this development will have.
Not applicable,
From FGFWFC Guidelines for Completion:
1. On a vegetation map of the site, show the location of all proposed
retention/detention lakes and ponds, swales, water control structures, and other
water management system facilities.
The generalized locations of major lakes are shown on Map H and Vegetation is shown on
Map F-1. The majority of lakes are planned in areas previously cleared of vegetation for
agricultural activities. Prior to approval of the ERP for each phase of the development by
the SFWMD, the specific locations of the lakes will be reviewed and approved by SFWMD.
The locations of the proposed control structures from the developed areas of the site to the
existing farm detention areas have been shown on Map I.
2. Provide design detail for proposed lakes, ponds, swales, etc., including depths, side
slopes, littoral zone creation, proposed wetland vegetation to be planted, high and
low water elevations and inundation duration, and hydrologic connections to native
wetlands or other stormwater management facilities.
In portions of the lakes that are not planted with littoral plantings, the proposed lakes at the
site will be sloped from the top of lake bank at a slope of four feet horizontal distance for
each one foot of vertical elevation change to a lake depth of six feet below the control
elevation, In portions of the lakes that are planted with littoral plantings, the proposed lakes
will be sloped at eight feet horizontal distance for each foot of vertical elevation change to
the anticipated low water elevation of three feet below control elevation and then at a slope
of four feet of horizontal change to each foot of vertical change to a depth of six feet below
the control elevation. The slope of the lakes will be at two feet of horizontal distance for
'1/20()4.-136531 VB': 011. MPERRY
-86-<113-000--0
19-5
rac
each one foot of vertical elevation change from an elevation of six feet below control
elevation to the maximum lake depth at 35 feet below control elevation,
The lake cross-section described above represents a typical lake bank cross-section,
There will be some exceptions for vertical lake bank treatments during the final design of
the development. Should steeper bank slopes be utilized in a lake, flatter slopes will be
implemented, in accordance with applicable regulatory codes, to compensate, Flatter
slopes may also be utilized within a lake, as a part of the design, to create littoral planting
areas along the bank.
The littoral planting species selection and the elevation strata for each species will be
reviewed by Collier County as a part of the Lake Excavation Permit submittal and the
survivability of the plantings will be insured through bonds provided to Collier County until
the county defined success criteria for the survivability of the littoral plantings is
accomplished,
The lake system will be interconnected with the native wetland areas and the discharge
rates from the lake system to the native wetland areas will be controlled using discharge
weirs to maintain the natural flow of surface water to the native wetland areas,
3. Discuss the proposed functioning of the stormwater management system with
emphasis on impacts to native plant communities and mechanisms to ensure
continued viability of these communities.
The proposed development of the surface water management system at the site is
expected to extend the hydro-period of the existing wetlands and provide a more natural
flow of surface water to the wetland areas, The current farming operations at the site
involve pumping of runoff from the farm fields to the wetland areas at a rapid rate; the water
management system proposed for the developed site will release runoff from the surface
water management lakes at a reduced rate over a longer period of time following water
quality treatment in the lakes.
~3J2004 135531 Vef 011- MPERRY
'36-013..000--0
19-6
~'8 C--
QUESTION 20 - SOLID WASTE/HAZARDOUS WASTE/MEDICAL WASTE
Existing Level of Service: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average
disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
Adopted Level of Service Standard: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the
average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
Level of Service After Project Buildout: : Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at
the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years
A. Provide a projection of the average daily volumes of solid waste generated at the
completion of each phase of development. Use the format below and identify the
assumptions used in the projection,
Collier County's contractor hauler, Immokalee Disposal Service, will collect solid waste
generated at the Town of Ave Maria. Single-family residential areas within the Town will
use the typical Collier County standard garbage containers provided by Collier County for
curbside pickup, Recycled materials will be collected from curbside recycling containers
through contract haulers. Residential recyclables and horticultural waste will be collected at
the curb on a weekly basis, Anticipated solid waste generation is provided in Table 20,A-1,
Construction debris will be collected and processed by a local business specializing in the
recycling of construction products,
Commercial and institutional facilities will utilize dumpster containers for the storage of
garbage and rubbish, Recycling containers will be used to store recyclables in the
commercial, university and institutional areas,
Solid waste collected at the Town of Ave Maria will be hauled to the Immokalee Landfill for
processing, The Immokalee Landfill is planned to be closed and converted to a solid waste
transfer station by Collier County, At such time, the solid waste collected at Ave Maria will
be hauled to the Immokalee transfer station, prior to being transported to the Collier County
Landfill. Discussion with Collier County indicates plentiful capacity at the Collier County
Landfill for the next 20 years,
Solid waste generation estimates are shown in Table 20.A-1, These estimates are
based on the criteria published in the State of Florida, Department of Environmental
Regulation Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Technical Assistance
Handbook, October, 1976, These generation rates do not account for anticipated
reductions in the disposal rate through source reduction and recycling. The Town of Ave
Maria will strive to meet the state's goal of achieving a 30% reduction between the
generation rate and the disposal rate through recycling programs. Table 20.A-2
demonstrates the anticipated benefits of the recycling program. At the request of the
County Manager, Ave Maria University will establish a special recycling program
focusing on the further reduction of solid waste from the university, The exact details of
this special program have not been established,
712312004- 135531 Ver-. 01!- MPERRY
03786-013-000--0
20-1
8e
".,".
,
Table 20.A-1
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Phase Domestic Solid Waste Domestic Solid Waste
Cubic Yards/day Tonslday
Existing 0 0
Phase 1 61.5 18,5
Phase 2 (buildout) 111,0 33.3
Table 20.A-2
Anticipated Benefits of the Recycling Program
Units Proposed
Garbage Garbage Garbage
Source/Housinll type Units Phase 1 Year 2011 (Ib/davl Iton/davl Ivd3/davl
Residential Dwellinq Unit 6,010 24,040 12.0 40,1
Retail 1t2 410,400 5,335 2,7 8,9
Office 1t2 276,600 5,532 2,8 9.2
Hotel room 110 220 0.1 0.4
Medical 1t2 15,000 300 0,2 0.5
Civic 1t2 115,500 1,502 0,8 2,5
Total before Recvclinq /Phase 1 I 36,929 18,5 61,5
rand Total with 30% Recycling (Phase 1)
25,850
12.9
43.1
Units Proposed
Garbage Garbage Garbage
Source/Housinll type Units Phase 2 Year 2016 (Ib/davl Iton/davl Ivd3/davl
Residential Dwellinq Unit 11,000 44,000 22.0 73,3
Retail 1t2 690,000 8,970 4,5 15.0
Office 1t2 510,000 10,200 5,1 17,0
Hotel room 400 800 0.4 1.3
Medical 1t2 35,000 700 0.4 1,2
Civic 1t2 148,500 1,931 1.0 3.2
Total before Recvclinq (Buildoutl 66,601 33,3 111.0
rand Total with 30% Recycling (Buildout)
46,620
23,3
77.7
B.1. Please specify the extent to which this project will contain laboratories, storage
facilities, and warehouse space where hazardous materials may be generated or
utilized. What types of hazardous waste or toxic materials are likely to be
generated? Will a hazardous materials management plan be prepared covering all
7/23/2004-135531 VeII,Ol!_MPERRY
037B6-0t3-OOQ.--Q
20-2
,.
sr
uses of hazardous materials on-site? If so, please discuss contents and
enforcement provisions,
Waste generated by the uses proposed for the Town of Ave Maria does not meet the
definitions of Industrial, Hazardous or Special Waste listed in the glossary of the above-
cited reference, Retail, service and community activity solid wastes are included under
the Domestic Solid Waste category,
B.2, Please discuss what measures will be taken to separate hazardous waste from the
solid waste stream, What plans and facilities will be developed for hazardous or
toxic waste handling, generation, and emergencies?
Any business found within the development that generates hazardous waste shall be
responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of the hazardous waste
generated by such business. However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste
storage facilities contrary to the Collier County zoning regulations,
B.3. Please identify off-site disposal plans for hazardous waste generated by this
development and provide assurance of proper disposal by a qualified contractor,
Any off-site disposal of hazardous waste would be the responsibility of the business that
has generated the hazardous waste, All local and state regulations will be followed in
the proper off-site disposal of hazardous waste,
B.4. What local and state regulations. permits and plans will regulate the generation and
handling of hazardous waste at this development?
Any business found within the development that generates hazardous waste shall be
responsible for following all local and state regulations pertaining to the generation and
handling of hazardous waste at this development.
c. For all waste disposal planned (on or off site), attach a copy of the letter from the
developer describing the types and volumes of waste and waste disposal areas
requested, and attach a letter from the agencies or firms providing services
outlining:
1. the projected excess capacity of the facilities serving the development at
present and for each phase through completion of the project,
It is anticipated that the municipal solid waste from the development will go to the
Immokalee Solid Waste Transfer Station (to be completed at the end of 2004, per
conversation with Collier County Solid Waste Staff), The transfer station is to
have a design capacity of 150 tons per day with a projected flow of 12 to 20 tons
per day for the next 5 years, Municipal solid waste projections for the year 2016
have the development sending 56 tons per day to the transfer station.
Ultimate disposal of the municipal solid waste will occur at the Collier County
Landfill, Discussion with Collier County's Solid Waste Department indicates that
this facility will have capacity for the next 20 years,
712312004-135531 Ver:Ol!-MPERRY
03786-0t3.-OCJCl.--1)
20-3
~"'
8 C Vh_
2. any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity,
The developer is not aware of any other contractual obligations for the disposal
of solid waste from the development.
3. a statement of the agency's or firm's ability to provide service at all times
during and after development (the agency or firm must be supplied with the
solid waste generation table in (Al above).
Immokalee Disposal Co, Inc, will provide franchise hauling services for both
municipal solid waste and construction and demolition throughout the
development. Please refer to Attachment 20.C-1, a letter from Linda Collins of
Immokalee Disposal Co, Inc" dated June 21,2004, verifying service ability.
7/2312004-135531 Va<, 011- MPERRY
03786--013-000-_0
20-4
Kl::CEIV'-f)
f_.._
W:iHSON MILLEr!
IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO, INC. ~UN ~~ilc,
120 Jefferson Avenue FOLDER#
Immokalee, A 34142
Phone (239) 657,2729
Fax (239) 657-7478
J.ne 21, 2004
WilsonMilJer, Inc,
3200 Bailey Lane Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
Attachment 20.C-l
RE: Service Availability
Dear Mr. Pajer:
This letter is to assure you that disposal and recycling services will be
provided to you at the proposed Ave Maria University and New Town
Development sites located in Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and
west of Camp Keais Road. Services will be provided upon your request.
If you require any additional information or have any questions, please
call me at 239-657-2729.
Sincerely,
ofLAA-L~ ~
Linda Collins
20-5
"8C
\~l'
PART IV. Transportation Resource Impacts
QUESTION 21 - TRANSPORTATION
Introduction
The Town will be a mixed-use community, planned using the principals of walkability and self-
sufficiency, The Town Master Plan (Map H) depicts the general location and configuration of
major community land uses and features. The Town will consist of residential neighborhoods
("R") connected by a network of low speed streets and sidewalks, a mixed-use town center
("M"), where residents and students will be provided essential goods and services, civic
gathering places, entertainment, dining, employment, and housing, The Community Facility
District (CF) accommodates civic, institutional, governmental, and essential services necessary
to support Town residents, The Wetland Preserves (W), Parks (P), and Lakes (L) establish the
open space and recreational framework of the Town. Design guidelines and an integrated plan
for landscaping, signage, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and community services will tie
the neighborhoods together, creating a viable town structure, while providing for individual
neighborhood identity. The AMU Campus will accommodate a full range of educational,
administrative, housing, recreational and support facilities to support university activities,
The Town will include the following land uses identified in Chapter 28-24, FAC,:
11,000 residential dwelling units
690,000 square feet of retail/service
510,000 square feet of office
400 hotel rooms
a 6,000-student university
In addition to the DRI threshold uses described above, the Town may include up to 450 units of
assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community and miscellaneous facilities,
35,000 square feet of medical facilities, public and private schools, uses such as golf courses,
lakes, open space, and community support facilities, and those uses customarily associated with a
university such as student and administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support
facilities,
The town uses are carefully planned to include commercial, service, civic, recreation, and
general support services within the Town of Ave Maria to satisfy the needs of residents and
students thereby minimizing the Project's potential impacts to the external road network, It is
anticipated that the Project will be a two-phase development with the first phase ending in 2011
and buildout in year 2016. For the purposes of trip generation, the anticipated development
parameters, by phase, have been aggregated by land use group as shown in Table 21-1.
7116J2004- 135532 Vet; 02'- '-'PERRY
~,
037B6-013-000..PDRJ_28423
21-1
Phase Phase
One Sub Two Sub
Total Total
Measurement (2006- (2012- Final
land Use Description Units 2011) 2016) Total
Residential Dwelling Units 6,010 4,990 11,000
Assisted Living Facilities Beds 0 450 450
Retail, Entertainment, Service Square Feet 367,900 322,100 690,000
Professional Office (General/Medical/Financial, etc.) Square Feet 276,600 233,400 510,000
Civic/Community/Miscellaneous (1) Square Feet 115,500 33,000 148,500
Medical Facilities Square Feet 15,000 20,000 35,000
Hotel Rooms 110 290 400
University Students 3,150 2,850 6,000
K-12 Schools (Private and Public) (2) Students 1,120 1,980 3,100
Table 21-1
Development Parameters
rae
(1} ~Civic, Community & Miscellaneous Space~ includes churches, day care centers. health/fitness centers, and libraries.
(2) For purposes of the traffic analysis, student population estimates a buildout include projected students that reside within the
town (2,487) and students that will reside outside the town but attend the public or private schools within the town.
The Town of Ave Maria will have direct access to Oil Well Road (CR-858) Road and to Camp
Keais Road, The study area for The Town of Ave Maria is shown on Exhibit 21-1, The roads
analyzed included segments of CR-858 (Oil Well Road), Camp Keais Road, CR-846
(Immokalee Road), CR-951 (Collier Boulevard), SR-29, SR-82, and 1-75.
The roadway segments analyzed are subject to the measurement of the Project's significant
impact. According to DRI rules, a project has "significant impact" on a roadway segment if
development traffic volumes representing 5% or more of the existing plus committed (E+C)
roadway service volumes at the Level of Service (LOS) standard of Collier County's Growth
Management Plan, for all State and County roadways except for Florida Intra-State Highway
System (FIHS) roadways, The Florida DOT establishes LOS standards and corresponding
service volumes for FIHS roadways, 1-75 is the only FIHS roadway within the study area.
"Adverse impact" is measured based on the level of service standards of the Collier County
Growth Management Plan, except for FIHS roads, where the Florida DOT standards control.
The major intersections within the study area were reviewed to determine if they were
significantly impacted by the Project (i.e., development traffic represented 5% or more of the
service volume at the LOS standard for anyone approach), Intersection capacity analysis was
conducted on those intersections shown in Table 21-2 that met the significance test or were
found to be adjacent to an adversely impacted roadway segment, with the exception of those
intersections for which analysis was waived in the methodology meeting.
,-
7/16/2004-135532 V8f:02!_'-PERRY
~
0376ti-013-000-PDRI_2B423
21-2
":'nl
'-CD
.......
1-<(
->.
al'tl
-::;,
:1:_
><1Il
W
ptac
~-.<l""'"
M
,
.-
N
>
"
"
~
g ~
Iii -'-
> "
o
~ ~
~ -
~"i!
~!::;
t:::uo
Be
"'~,,.
Table 21-2
Intersections Analyzed
Intersection
Immokalee Rd, at 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramp
-- -.. -.-
Immokalee Rd, at 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp
, '--- ._._~-
Immokalee Rd, at Oakes Blvd.
-- ,-,-
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd,
--".__._---._--~
Immokalee Rd, at Wilson Blvd, ------
.-- -----.--..-----
!n'1mokalee R~, at RandEdl Blvd.
Immokalee Rd, at Oil Well Rd,
----- --_._~-
Immokalee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd,
Immokalee Rd, (1st. St.) at S,R. 29 (Main St.)
-"-----._-
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St.
------ -----.._-
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at Immokalee [)r. -
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at lake Trafford Rd, .---
Oil Well Rd, at Everglades Blvd,
r-'---
~_IJI/_ell Rd, at Ave Maria Entrance
Oil Well Rd, at Camp Keais Rd, -,
~i1 Well Rd, at SR 29 - ----
Camp Keais Rd, atAve Maria Entrance
Collier Blvd, at Vanderbilt Beach Rd,
----- --
Collier Blvd, at Golden Gate Blvd.
--
Collier Blvd, at Pine Ridge Rd,
For roadway segments, the following conditions were analyzed,
Existing Conditions.
. Future Conditions Without the Project.
. Future Conditions With the Project.
For intersections, the following conditions were analyzed,
Existing Conditions
Future Conditions With the Project
A transportation methodology section of the Pre-Application Document was submitted April 30,
2004 as part of the DRI Pre-Application Conference package, A transportation methodology
meeting was held with the review agencies, including the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
7/16/2004- 135532 Va,: 02!- MPERRY
=.,
037ll6-01J.-()()()"PDRI_28423
21-4
Council and Collier County, as a part of the Pre-Application Conference on May 19, 2004.
Those in attendance during the transportation methodology meeting included the following,
8CC-:-
Donald Scott, Collier County Transportation Planning Department
Charles Barmby, Collier County Metropolitan Planning Department
Bernard Piawah, State Department of Community Affairs
Jeff Perry, Wilson Miller, Inc,
Gavin Jones, WilsonMiller, Inc.
A Supplemental Pre-Application Document that reflects discussions at that meeting was
prepared and submitted to the review agencies, The transportation methodology section of the
Pre-Application Document and the Supplemental Pre-Application Document dated May 25,
2004 are included as Appendix 21-1,
The following response to ADA Question 21 Transportation was prepared in a manner
consistent with the agreed upon transportation methodology,
A. Using Map J or a table as a base, indicate existing conditions on the highway
network within the study area (as previously defined on Map J), including AAOT,
peak-hour trips directional, traffic split, levels of service and maximum service
volumes for the adopted level of service (LOS). Identify the assumptions used in
this analysis, including "K" factor, directional "0" factor, facility type, number of
lanes and existing signal locations. (If levels of service are based on some
methodology other than the most recent procedures of the Transportation Research
Board and FOOT, this should be agreed upon at the pre-application conference
stage.) Identify the adopted LOS standards of the FOOT, appropriate regional
planning council, and local government for roadways within the identified study
area. Identify what improvements or new facilities within this study area are
planned, programmed, or committed for improvement. Attach appropriate excerpts
from published capital improvements plans, budgets and programs showing
schedules and types of work and letters from the appropriate agencies stating the
current status of the planned, programmed and committed improvements.
Existinq Roadwav Network
The existing roadway network in the vicinity of The Town of Ave Maria is shown in Map
J. The major roads within the study area include CR-846 (Immokalee Road), Collier
Boulevard, CR-858 (Oil Well Road), Camp Keais Road, SR-29, SR-82 and 1-75,
Existinq Roadwav Conditions
For purposes of this study, the daily traffic counts reported in the Collier Countv
Department of Transportation 2003 Traffic Counts, the Collier County Annual Update
and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIRl, December, 2003 and the Lee County
2003 Concurrencv Manaqement report, along with peak hour turning movement counts
conducted for this study, were used to evaluate existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of
the Project. Daily counts were converted to peak season, peak hour conditions using
the K factors presented in the table, 2003 traffic was inflated one year at historical
growth rates.
Table 21-3 provides the service volumes published by Collier County in the AUIR
711612004- 135532 Va" 02!- MPERRY
~~,
03786-013.-000-PDRI_28423
21-5
Transportation Planning Database and by Lee County in the 2003 Concurrency
Management Report, Table 21-4 reports service volume developed for roadways where
service volumes or peak hour traffic counts were not availablelpublished,
8e
2004Es
2003 !mated
Peak Peak Peak Vol. to
Hour Hour Hour Min.
PeakD!r. Peak Annual Peak Std.
AUIR Exist Min. Service Olr. Count Growth Oir. SV
Road Llmlts 10' Road Std. Volume Volume Station' Rate Volume Ratio
Camp Keals Rd. Oil Well Rd. to Ave Maria Entrance 61 2U 0 860 160 626 17.5 188 0.22
Camp Keals Rd. Ave Maria Entrance to Immokalee Rd. 61 2U 0 860 160 626 17.5 188 0.22
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 30 2U 0 1240 950 655 11.8 1,063 0.86
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Golden Gate Blvd. to Pine Ridge Rd. 31 40 0 2180 1980 536 9.1 2,161 0.99
Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Pine Ridge Rd. to Green Blvd. 31 40 0 2180 1980 525 4.3 2,065 0.95
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 46 2U 0 860 280 671 9.9 308 0.36
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keals Rd. 46 2U 0 860 280 677 2.7 288 0.33
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 46 2U 0 860 280 620 1,2 283 0.33
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oil Well Road to Wilson Blvd. 45 60 0 3190 1020 675 12.8 1,150 0.36
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Wilson Blvd. to Collier Blvd. 44 60 0 3660 1270 593 8,6 1,379 0,38
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Collier Blvd. to Oakes Blvd. 43 40 0 2320 2240 656 16.5 2,609 1.12
Immokalee Road (CR 846) Oakes Blvd. to 1-75 NB 43 40 0 2320 2240 568 11.7 2,502 1.08
Immokalee Road (CR 846) 1-75 NB to 1-75 SB 43 40 0 2320 2240 568 11.7 2.502 1.08
Immokalee Rd. (SR 82) Hendry County Line to Sunshine Blvd. 2U E 1170 504 L213 12.6 567 0.48
Lake Trafford Road N. 15 th S1. to Lake Trafford 47 2U 0 760 640 551 2,3 654 0.86
SR 29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 82 2U C 670 110 615 0.7 111 0.17
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 83 2U C 670 450 665 0.0 450 0.67
Main S1. (SR 29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 84 40 C 1860 850 665 0.0 850 0,46
Main 5t. (SR 29) 1st. S1. (CR 846) to CR 29A South 84 40 C 1860 850 665 0.0 850 0.46
Main S1. (SR 29) 1st. St. (CR 846) to N 15th 5t. 84 40 C 1860 850 664 0,6 855 0.46
N, 15th 51. (5R 29) Main S1. to Immokalee Dr. 85 2U C 860 470 683 4.4 491 0.57
N, 15th 51. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr. to lake Trafford Rd. 85 2U C 860 470 683 4.4 491 0.57
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 85 2U C 860 470 663 5,9 498 0,58
N, 15th 51. (5R29) 29A North to SR 82 86 2U C 720 630 663 5.9 667 0.93
SR29 North of SR 82 87 2U C 720 290 591 3,7 301 0.42
SR82 SR 29 to Hendry County Line 88 2U C 720 540 661 5.9 572 0,79
New Market S1. (SR 29 A) Indian River S1. to Main St. 59 2U 0 1010 450 612 4.5 470 0.47
North 1st. 5t. North of Main St. 58 2U 0 1000 400 590 0,7 403 0,40
Table 21-3
Existing Roadway Conditions
Roadways with Published Service Volumes
7/1612004- 135532 v...-: 021- MPERRY
O~
03786-013-OQO...PORI-28423
21-6
o
Gl
E
::::J
'0
0>
C Gl
o ,!:!
:;::;~
"CGl
ClI)
o
"'O"C
. Gl
... >...c:
Nl'll0
Gl~=
-"C.Q
.Ql'll::::J
l'llOCl.
I- 0:: l!:
C)::l
C..c:
.- -
- ,-
.!!! ~
>< 0
W>.
l'll
~
"C
l'll
o
0::
s .. 0
..E ~ >;:;
~:&CI)cn~
"Ot..:. i.llC :;.lIC . E
OUl~:O:g.=.a
~WEI1.%l1.00
- >
-
.~ :a
c",
0-
~::E'I:t~
o D.. Ql.... i;-
N l1.::i:3C:
..0-
~~
~€J!l
~ ~ ~
~ ~ I<
";(0
. ~
0-0
:~1i
V)O~
~80iM
COO~O
CU'"
- ~
~ 0
5=.
u~
~ ~
"",,;.lIC..;.ue
:O:._~.2
l1.::E:11.0QlO
"'>
'"
M
o
"'
"':
~
..
"'
o
"' N '"
I'- r--. 0 ~
C"') ~ LO
~
....0-
~~
c-o
:iCi)
ii
~ 0
WI<
>"
"'g
l!l
E
::J
..,
!:
I<
oo
"'
o
~
oo
....
N
o
,.:
oo
o
'"
....
a;
<0
oo
"'
oo
o
"'
'"
o
:;)
'"
;;;
~
~
ili
"
10
(!)
<=
"
'0
<5
(!)
.8
-0
c::
Qi
;;:
is
~
ili
OJ>
"
'0
'"
E>
"
>
W
'"
oo
o
oo
"'
o
..
"'
"'
~
'"
o
'"
oo
oo
oo
.,;
~
"' oo oo
oo .... ....
oo N N
0) N N
'"
.,;
"!
N
;;
oo
<0
~
..
N
00
~ ~ ~
oo .... ;;:
000
"' "' "'
'" '" '"
000
:;) c:: c::
N N N
'" .... ....
N oo oo
~
ili
OJ>
"
'0
'"
E>
"
>
w
.8
'0
'"
o
'0 c::
> "
co g
~ ~
'0 <=
'" w
~ ~
~ ::;;
w ~
1i.
-0 "
> "
ffi m
OJ> '"
" 0
1il E
e> E
"
>
w
.8
~
ili
<=
o
!!!
~
.8
-0
>
ili
"
10
(!)
<=
"
'0
<5
(!)
'0
'"
o
c::
Qi
;;:
is
N
~
o
"' "' "'
"' "' oo
c> 0 0
'" '" '"
o 0 N
N N ~
"!
N
;::
"'.
"'
o
-
N
'"
....
-
'0
'"
f1.
Qi
;;:
is
N
o
oo
N
;::
"!
~
"'
~
~
N
'"
....
~
:li
;;:
o
"'
'"
o
c::
'"
....
oo
-0
c::
'"
'iii
"
"
0.
E
'"
o
.8
'0
'"
o
c::
"
o
<=
~
1"
w
:;)
::;;
~
'0
'"
o
c::
Qi
;;:
is
'"
o
o
"'
"'
~
a;
"' "'
.... ..
'" '"
<'i
.. 0
"' "'
ci 0
'" 0
"' '"
"' oo
.... -
"'
~
~
'" 0
.... ...
'" "'
cD 0
.... N
oo
N
oo 0
to r--:
"'
"'
-.
-
o 0
o 0
o N
u-i en
.... ~
"'
~
~
o
o
~
'"
::;;
;;:
'"
o
o
'"
o
"'
'"
o
..
'"
'"
o
o
c::
N
u.
..
oo
oo
"'
"'
'"
'"
c::
UJ
.8
-0
c::
.<:
o
'"
"
m
.l!!
'2
o
m
.8
-0
c:: -0
OJ> c::
"a; l8
~ m
0. ~
E E
('] E
'0
'"
o
c::
Qi
;;:
is
"'
";-
....
..
o
.
i}"
"'
"'
o
N
o
N
m
u.
..
"'
"'
;r; ~
'" 0
c:: 0
o .
.9 b
~ ::r:
ffi ;:
in
"
15
z
"'
";-
<,,'"
I"-
,
...
N
~
.
~
"
~ ~
~ 0:
. ~
~ 8
" ~
il"~
;;~8
8C~=
Existinq Intersection Conditions
Existing PM peak hour, peak season intersection capacity analysis was conducted for
the intersections in the table below.
The intersection capacity analysis used recent turning movement counts conducted by
Wilson Miller, Inc, Traffic count data, by intersection, is included in Appendix 21-2,
The existing PM peak hour, peak season levels of service for intersections under study
are summarized below in Table 21-5, The detailed intersection capacity analyses,
performed using SYNCHRO Version 6 software (based on the 2000 Highway Capacity
Manual), are provided in Appendix 21-2, (Note: Electronic versions of the SYNCHRO
network and the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS)
travel demand model files are provided on the accompanying CD-ROM.)
Table 21-5
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Existing 2004 Traffic Conditions
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
Worst Movement (Un-
Averaoe Sianalized Onlvl
I Level of
Service Delay Move- Delay
Intersection (LOS) (See,) ment LOS (Sec.)
Immokalee Rd, at 1.75 Southbound On/Off Ramp C 27,7
Immokalee Rd, at 1.75 Northbound On/Off Ramp B 10,9
Immokalee Rd, at Oakes Blvd, D 37,6
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd, D 36,1
Immokalee Rd, at Wilson Blvd, E 70,3
Immokalee Rd, at Randall Blvd, B 11,3
Immokalee Rd, at Oil Well Rd, A 8,2
Immokalee Rd, at Camp Keais Rd, A 3,3 WB B 12,8
Immokalee Rd, (1st. St.) at S,R. 29 (Main St.) B 10,1
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St. B 11,2
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at Immokalee Dr, B 10.4
Fifteenth St. (SR29) at lake Trafford Rd, C 25.2
Oil Well Rd, at Everglades Blvd, A 12,6 NB D 32,0
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance N/A N/A
Oil Well Rd, at Camp Keais Rd, A 6.5 NB B 11,7
Oil Well Rd, at SR 29 A 5,0 EB B 10,3
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance N/A N/A
Collier Blvd, at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. F 109,2
Collier Blvd, at Golden Gate Blvd, B 15,8
Collier Blvd, at Pine Ridge Rd, D 51,9
711612004- 135532 V..r: 02!- '-'F'ERRY
~~
03786-013-000-PDRI_28423
21-8
Be
~
Committed Road Improvements
A number of road improvements are currently under construction or programmed for
construction in order to help alleviate current and projected roadway level of service
deficiencies, Those committed improvements are summarized below in Table 21-6,
Table 21-6
Committed Roadway Improvements
Exist AUlR
Link From/To Road Pro]. # Improvement
County Bam Rd, Dalis BI\d, to CR 864 2U 60101 2L TO 4L
Golden Gate Pkwy Airport Rd, to 1-75 4D 99914 4L TO 6L
Golden Gate Pkwy 1.75 to Santa Barbara BI\d, 4D 99915 4L TO 6L
Goodlette-Frank Rd, Vanderbilt Bch, Rd, to Pine Ridge Rd, 4D 60134 4L TO 6L
Goodlette-Frank Rd, Pine Ridge Rd. to Golden Gate Parkway 4D 60131 4L TO 6L
Collier BI\d, (CR 951) Immokalee Rd, to Golden Gate BI\d, 2U 65061 2L TO 6L
Collier BI\d, (CR 951) Davts Bl\d. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 4D 66062 4L TO 6L
Collier BI\d, (CR 951) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to US41 4D 66061 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. US 41 to Airport Rd, 4D 66042 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. Airport Rd, to 1.75 4D 66043 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd, 1,75 to CR 951 4D 69101 4L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. CR 951 to Wilson BI\d 2U 60018 2L TO 6L
Immokalee Rd. Wilson BI\d, to Oil Well Road 2U 99920 2L TO 6L
Li'v1ngston Road-III Immokalee Rd. to Vanderbilt Bch. Rd, 62071 NEW 6L
U'v1ngston Road-III Vanderbilt Bch, Rd, to Pine Ridge Rd, 62071 NEW 6L
Rattlesnake Hmck Rd. Polly Ave, to CR951 2D 65022 2L TO 4L
Santa Barbara BI\d, Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Rd. 4D 62081 4L TO 6L
Santa Barbara BI\d, Radio Rd, to SR 84 4D 99909 4L TO 6L
Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Airport Rd, to Logan BI\d. 2U 63051 2L TO 6L
Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Logan BI\d, to CR951 2U 99927 2L TO 6L
1,75 At Golden Gate Parkway NEW INlERCHANGE
Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or scheduled for
construction within the next three years were considered to be committed improvements,
These were found in the Collier County AUIR on Public Facilities (December, 2003) and
FDOT's Adopted Work Program for Collier County, Fiscal Year 2003/2004 - 2007/2008,
7/1612004-135532 Var: 02!-MPERRY
~~
0378f>.Ol3-000-PDRj.26423
21-9
!<i'
~.
B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development.
State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by
land use types, sources of data, model split, persons per vehicle, etc., as
appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation
(including the Florida Standard Urban Model Structure or the Institute of
Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the pre-
application conference stage.
Project Development Parameters
The Town of Ave Maria is being programmed to develop in two phases, with Phase 1
ending in 2011 and Buildout in 2016. The Project's development parameters are
provided below in Table 21-7,
Table 21-7
Development Parameters
Phase Phase
One Sub Two Sub
Total Total
Measurement (2006- (2012 - Final
Land Use Description Units 2011) 2016) Total
Residential Dwelling Units 6,010 4,990 11,000
Assisted Living Facilities Beds 0 450 450
Retail. Entertainment, Service Square Feet 367,900 322,100 690,000
Professional Office (General/Medical/Financial. etc,) Square Feet 276,600 233,400 510,000
Civic/Communily/Miscellaneous (1) Square Feet 115,500 33,000 148,500
Medical Facilities Square Feet 15,000 20,000 35,000
Hotel Rooms 110 290 400
University Students 3,150 2,850 6,000
K,12 Schools (Private and Public) (2) Students 1,120 1,980 3,100
(t) "Civic, Community & Miscellaneous Space" includes churches, day care centers, health/fitness centers. and libraries.
(2) For purposes of the traffic analysis, student population estimates a buildout include projected students that reside within the
town (2,487) and students that will reside outside the town but attend the public or private schools within the town.
ITE Trip Generation
Consistent with the current policy of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council,
Project trip generation was based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook (7th Edition), and
application-specific data based upon alternative trip generation studies. The trip
generation calculations for Phase 1 and Buildout are presented in Tables 21-8 and 21-9,
respectively,
7/1612004-135532 Ver:02l-'-FERRY
-
0378G.-013-lXlO-PDRf-28423
21-10
C
0'"
00;:"-
.",0
.....N
NGI-
GlC",
-GIGI
~ Cl III
I- .5!-.!
'=0.
~..Ot
. , c
o..o?
~:I:~
~ m
. c
III ~"I:
.. 0 .
~:t:c
.. W
~
:: ~ !!
.. 0 0
"''''....
..
o
..
'"
m
'"
q
m
N
"-,
~
,.,
00
OlE
- ~
~....
....
en C") I'- 0
~ ~ S; 0
1"-- ..- '<i .0
~ J!l
~~
,~
Z 0
o 0
"- 0
o '"
N
..
'"
m
;::
'"
'"
;!
..
m
N
'"
'"
..
" "
"- "-
q ~
c
.
~l!
, c
.=>
.
.
'"
~ .2 2 2
"2 "t: 'c "c
:J :J :J ::l III
01 OJ 01 en "'C
@ @ @ :2 ~
Q) Q) Q) ID
~ ~ ~ ~
c
o
a
'C
o
.
.
o
w
::
'"
c
'..
~
o
r
'0
.
~
o
.
..
o
""
"E 2 ro
8!. f6 'E
(I) ~ ~
~ ro "i/j
U5 ~ &
w{l
.... 0
-0
o
N
o 0
N '"
N N
..
,
e
C>
.
.
=>
..
.
:g
o
.
.
o
.
00
~
o
~
c
.
t'
E
~
."
E
o
'0
C
o
o
'0
.
~
o
.
..
o
m
c
'..
,
o
r
'S
::i'
o
."
.
<n
~
N
'C
.
..
~
.
l-
.
~
'"
~1I)~z..~
"E C "E ~ ::J
~ CD III l.L "
ii~i~
U5 <c ::2 U5 <C
c
~
~
o
.
.
o
"1!
.
c
.
'"
~
'E
.
'0
'..
&'
'"
N
'"
m
..
N
'"
'"
o
'5
::;
'0
..,
00
..
:i'
..
'"
N
0;
15
r
o
'"
0;
15
r
;;;
'"
..
..
'"
~
'"
N
~
'"
'"
o
..
;;;
..
o
'"
.,;
o
o
o
N
~
;::
J!l
."
E ~
o ~
c2 Qj
~
oE
o
~
E
E
o
o
~
'E
.
'0
'..
&'
'0
.
X
::.
o
o 'c
o ,
"fi =2
<n <5
i:' ,g
. 0
'E <n
. .
E "
. '0
ill ~
o
o
o N
N N
~ ~
..
"-
;;;
~
'"
'"
o
"-
!!I
~
.
'E
.
'0
,
;;;
J!l
c
.
'0
,
;;;
J!l
o
.
'0
~
;;;
'"
~
N
..
'"
m
'"
N
..
~
"-
~
"-
o
~
"-
N
'"
N
o
N
'"
..
m
'"
N
'"
~
~
;;;
"-
o
m
'"
~
,.:
N
<<i Q) IV Q) Q) Q)
CD Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
l.L U. l.L LL LL U.
~ ~ lD ~ ~ ~
1tI ctI Iii III m l'\I
5- 5- 6- ,~ ,~ ,~
00 00 {/') U) en (I)
::.:::: ~ :::.c ::.:::: ::.:::: :::.c
"-
N
m
N
.
'E
.
o
.
:;;
o
0>-
.
o
Q) 2
'E c
. .
~ ~
c c
~i [
.0 ~ ~
::J (/') (f.I
o
'"
'"
N
'"
~
N
'"
~
g
:g
'5
m
.
o
IE
o
~
.
o
.
(!)
o
;::
N N N N N N N N N c") ~
~
'E
.
'0
'..
&'
'0
.
.
"
u.
<!
u.
<n
<5
o
~
o
<n
~
'"
j'
"
(5 "E
o ~
~ :::e
o <5
<n 0
i:' ~
. 0
'E <n
. .
E "
. '0
m ~
<5
o
~
o
<n
~
'"
j'
N
~ .
- ~
g '5
-5 ~
(/) ~
. ~
- .
. >
-f: "c
.. ::>
'" 0
'" ~
~ ~
N
~ .
- ~
g '0
TI ~
(/') ."!::::
. ~
- .
. >
> .-
'0 0
.. ::>
c
o
~
o
~
'0
W
..
N
"-
'"
'"
~
'"
..
,.:
..
"-
"-
"
~
'"
'"
'"
00
'E
.
'0
~
;;;
~
~
~
~
o
o
'"
~
~
~
,
~
o
~
'E
.
o
~
. i:'
';. E
. .0
D ::J
~
."
~ 00
E ~
E g
o c
0-"
-0;
~ ~
(S~
~
'"
~
000
m N N
~ '" '"
..
c
.
o
00
00
.
S
i:i:
o
:f:;
i3
"
o
"
~
"
o
'0
.
"
.
o
15
"
'0
o
.
o
~
"
o
'0
.
<!
~
.
o
.
(!)
.
o
15
"
o
o
'..
.
.
e
..
'"
N
'"
'"
'"
m
'"
'"
"
N
m
N
"-
"-
N
.
~
o
<(
.
~
'" ~
. 0
.. 0
~ <5
i3 C9
:;:
~
~
~ <5
(3 c:>
"-
m
'"
'"
..
~
o
'"
N
;!
N
'"
o
'"
;;;
~
..
00
.
<5
r
o
'"
..
..
.
~
~
o
o
'"
o
E
~
-"
.
.
0::
"
o
.~
.
<n
"
o
o
~-
.0
.. .
o,~
'6.~
2"$
~ 0
<nW
'"
o
.
E
o
..
'C
.
'E
w.
,_ 0
2l"t:
. .
O::<n
.
~
5
N
..
"-
..
'"
'"
~
N
".
'"
..
N
.,;
m
,.:
'"
'"
..
.
u.
~
.
~
cr
<n
'"
.
'E
.
o
'"
o
0.
0.
o
~
<n
o
N
'"
..
~
'"
"'
'"
'"
'"
,.:
'"
s
{!.
;;; '"
o
'" ~
..
'"
N
'"
m '"
'"
N 0
N
o '"
o
.. m
N M
'"
..
..
o
E
.
l<
W
o
o
'"
'"
'"
"-
'"
N
.
E
.
:E
}1'
Be
--;/:
...
...
,
...
C\I
>
"
"
w
.
,
~ ~
> "
o
" .
; ~
~-~
::Ja
r::~
0'"
(F)"- "l"""
.1ijc
~...N
NCII~
Cl)C:;
-ClIO
'cCl"O
nI _
I- Q,,-
,- :::l
.=m
~...OI
. , c
l1.oE
'" " .
.. w
~ '"
. c
:~a
"'''c
.. w
~
. "-
cfg~
",,,...
..
'"
;; u
olE
- .
.. "
0'"
...
:;l!
~;g
, ~
Z 0
~
::f
,.:
N
~
"'
'"
"'
~
"'
0>
~
...
'"
o
'"
'"
oj
0>
0>
0>
'"
'"
"'
'"
~
o
'"
u5
o
o
'"
~
"
0;
~
0>
N
N
...
'"
"
'"
'"
'"
0>
0>
"
0>
.
.;;;
,
o
I
u
.
~
U
.
..
o
~
E E ro
~ Ql E
w E ~
1>> ffi "Vi
. ~ .
U5 <( 0:::
o
N
o 0
N '"
N N
.
o
,
o
~
.
.
o
t::
E
,
:5;
E
o
u
.
o
U
;:
o
<<i
"
~
'"
<<i
~
0>
<\
'"
0>
.
.,
:::;
U
..,
o
';;;
o
<(
"
~
N
~
~
::f
0>
0>
0>
~
'"
o
~
"
..
15
I
o
'"
~
;:
N
'"
N
"
...
N
...
...
"'
'"
'"
'"
~
~
"'
"'
'"
'"
'"
'"
N
'"
"'
'"
"'
...
"
'"
...
'"
~
'"
N
...
0>
'"
...
o
CD Q:i ID a:;
Q) Q) Q) Q)
LL u.. lL U.
~ !!! ~ ~
IlJ ro ro (U
5- ,~ ,~ ,~
(/) en (f) CI)
::.:: ::::.:: ::::.:: ::.::
Q) 2:n
c c:: C
. ..
~ ~ ~
~ .,.~~
~ ~ ~ 2
o :::::i (f) en
'"
"
N
"
...
"'
N
0>
~
,.:
N
...
~
'"
~
o
;:
'"
...
...
...
'"
..
o
o
~
oj
c
.
E.
f~
, .
.=>
.
.
'"
~ :g .~ .~
:J =:l :J ::> (/}
OJ OJ 01 Ol U
@ @ ~ ~ ~
Q) Q) Q) Q;
~ ~ ~ ~
..
15
I
~
N
'"
"'
"
N
"
"'
...
c
,g
o
'.
u
.
.
o
w
t:
.
w"
... 0
-u
o
,
~
"
.
.
=>
"
~
u
.
.
o
u
.
~
u
ro
..
o
0>
.
';;;
,
o
I
'5
u
<(
o
'0
.
<n
~
N
'"
'"
N
"'
"
...
'"
;;;
o
~
o
"'
'"
'"
'"
o
'"
~
U') 0 0 Cl
CO m N N
Ii} U') CO CO
":
~
~
'"
o
"'
~
..,
.
e-
ro
...
.
:!:
0>
~ Z:- c::
"E .!!! ~ "E :5
({I c: E ro
lL Q) n:s u. "0
CD E '+ Ql '*
"En ffi :;::; m"w
c:: Q. "3 c: III
i:ij ..:( :E en <(
.
,g
o
'.
u
.
.
o
~
.
.
.
"
...
o
N
"'
"
N
...
'"
"'
"
"'
o
N
'"
~
N
'"
N
oj
~
'"
N
~
0>
'"
g
:2
'5
<D
.
u
!E
o
~
.
.
.
(!)
'"
...
~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N M ~
..
'E
.
u
';;;
.
0:
o
o
"
o
o
N
oj
o
o
N
o
o
'"
o
o
0>
J'l
'0
E ~
g ~
0: ..
~
J'l
.
.
u
,
Iii
o
C
.
u
,
Iii
o
C
.
u
,
Iii
~
.
,
E
E
o
U
..
'E
.
u
';;;
8!
u
.
.
"
o
(5 'C
o ,
-fi =2
<n "
.,. i'
. u
c <n
. .
E '"
. u
i:iJ ~
"
o
~
u
<n
~
0>
I
N
;;:: ~
- "
<3 =
o 0
~ U
u "
rt.l :~
. ~
- .
~ .~
"C c:
0. ::>
'" 0
'" ~
~ ~
N
;;:: ~
- .
o =
o 0
~ \!
al ~
. ~
- .
~ .~
'. .
0. ::>
.
Q
;;
u
,
u
UJ
c;
o
o N
N N
~ ~
~
C
.
u
.;;;
8!
u
.
.
"
u.
::E
U:
<n
"
o
~
u
<n
~
0>
I
5
o 'c
o ,
-fi ~
<n "
.,. i'
ro u
c <n
. .
E "
. U
W ~
o
N
"'
"'
...
~
0>
o
o
o
u5
~
o
o
C
.
u
,
Iii
Q) G)
. .
u. u.
~ .
ro ~
, ,
U u
<n <n
'" '"
~
~
,
~
U
~
~
,
~
U
"
.
c
.
u
.
~
() ~
>- D
~ :::::i
z-
'0
, 0
E 1:
E .
o .
U.!l!
.2 B
> .!!?
G:E
..,
.
.
U
o
o
.
S
u:
u
:S
(j
..
U
'"
.
::E
..
U
'"
.
::E
.
u
!E
o
]!
u
.
ro
.
~
..
U
"
.
~
~
.
.
.
(!)
.
u
!E
o
..
.
o
';;;
.
.I!
e
a.
0>
'"
'"
o
~
'"
.
~
'" '
ro 0
0. U
'" "
<3 <9
::;
.
~
'" '
ro 0
0. U
i?:' 0
o t9
...
...
0>
;;;
":
"
"
'"
~
...
~,
N
N
'"
N
o
o
0>
'"
..
.
u.
~
ro
,
u
<n
'"
.
c
.
U
0>
.
."
~
o
~
<n
o
N
"'
"
'"
'"
N
,,;
~ ~
"'
IP'
Be
",,''1$
'"
'"
...
"'
'"
~
,,;
...
oj
~
"
"'
o
0>
o
::;
ro
E
.
E
N
~
,
~
N
>
~
~
~ ~
. "
> "
o
n
~.~
d"
'"
'"
...
"
"
N
N
'"
N
oj
"'
'"
'"
.
~
U
<(
.
.
"
I
o
'"
"
"
~
~
15
'"
.
~
,
..
.
.
0:
"
u
.~
.
'"
..
.
o
~-
. .
0. .
- E
0>.
.~ "ffi
~~
~ .
"'UJ
'"
c
.
E
.
"
"
.
c
UJ .
u
]I ~
~~
<\
"'
o
... ...
o 0>
'"
-.:i ID
N
o
"
,.:
N
'"
u5
...
J!
o
...
.
E
.
1<
w
8C"'~
The ITE trip generation formulae, adjusted for internal capture, were the basis for the
expected external daily traffic volumes to and from the Town of Ave Maria traffic analysis
zone (T AZ) on the arterial road network, Consistent with the methodology outlined in the
FDOT DRI Modeling Workshop, the Town of Ave Maria TAZ zonal contents in the
residential and commercial land use data sets were first loaded with unadjusted
projections of dwelling units by type, hotel and motel rooms, school enrollment, and
employees by type (commercial and service), Commercial square footage projections
were converted to employment levels using floor area to employee conversion factors
derived from ITE trip generation data, Those initial Town of Ave Maria zonal contents
were uniformly adjusted (preserving relative magnitudes) until the external daily traffic
produced by the model was sufficiently close to the ITE based estimate,
Individual model iterations were not saved. The final model run that provided a close
correlation between ITE and FSUTMS estimates was saved, and is provided on the
accompanying CD-ROM,
A comparison of the resultant FSUTMS daily trip generation with the ITE trip generation
for Phase 1 and Buildout is provided below in Table 21-10.
Table 21-10
Trip Generation Comparison
Net New External Daily Trips
ITE Daily FSUTMS FSUTMS As %
Phase Trips Daily Trips oflTE
Phase 1(2011) 44,_~13 43,490 98,6
.. --
Buildout (2016) 76,312 75,840 99.4
Project trips on specific roadway segments were determined through select zone analysis
following the model assignment.
C. Estimate the internal/external split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of
development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a
discussion of what aspects ofthe development (i.e" provision of on-site shopping
and recreation facilities, on-site employment opportunities, etc,) will account for this
internal/external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were
estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model
Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed
design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project.
As a master planned mixed use, residentialluniversity town, The Town of Ave Maria will
have retail, service, entertainment and related support services, including governmental,
civic and educational uses, plus recreational facilities for the use by the town's residents
and students, To support the town's geographic location, a significant collection of
commercial and support services are programmed to satisfy the majority of the daily
7ft6l2004- 135532 Ver: Q2l_ WERRY
~,
03786-013-000-PDRI-28423
21-13
~8C
~c.,It'.
needs of the town's residents, thus minimizing the need to travel along the external
highway network, Many of the employment opportunities created within The Town of
Ave Maria can and will be satisfied by town residents and students,
The town's commercial centers are strategically planned and located within the
development where they can be easily reached via internal local roads and non-
motorized pathways for bicyclists and pedestrians, The Town of Ave Maria is being
designed as a "pedestrian friendly" town with commercial services and recreational
facilities generally located in close proximity of the residents and students. The town
centers will provide retail and service establishments intended to capture those
convenience-type trips (to satisfy day-to-day needs) that would otherwise be making
longer trips on the adjacent arterial highway network,
Unlike smaller mixed use developments which are only able to support fractional or
limited commercial and support service uses, The Town of Ave Maria with its residential
and student population mix will have the "critical mass" necessary to support a wide
range of uses within its boundaries. Coupled with 95% of the student population of Ave
Maria University living on campus (based on past history and university policy) or in
affiliated housing within the Town, means a substantial amount of internalization of trips
will take place both on a daily basis and during the p,m, peak hour analysis period,
Daily traffic patterns of both residential and commercial land uses involve a variety of
purposes over the course of an entire day, starting and ending with the home-based-
work trips, During the mid-day, however, a multitude of purposes contribute the trip-
making patterns. Businesses may have employees coming and going all day long, as
well as travel generated by customers and deliveries, Residential land uses may
generate, school, personal business and recreational trips in additional to the work trip
purpose.
Unlike daily trip generation data, peak hour trip making characteristics clearly reflect the
dominance of the home-based work trip in the p,m, peak period for most uses,
However, during other periods of the day, such dominance does not necessarily occur.
For instance, retail, office and University trips during mid-day are likely to be more
externally weighted, since mid-day trips are more "business and service oriented".
Clearly, a daily traffic analysis would most likely reveal an internal capture rate for all of
The Town of Ave Maria's traffic at a much lower rate than during the p.m. peak hour.
When considering only the p,m. peak period in the analysis, it is clear that due to the
unique circumstances of land use-mix and location of The Town of Ave Maria, a higher
than normal internalization of traffic should occur,
A series of calculations were made to estimate the internallexternal orientation of trips
within and external to The Town of Ave Maria during the p,m, peak hour,
The specific assumptions for internal capture for Phase 1 and Buildout are provided in
Exhibits 21-2 and 21-3, respectively.
7/1612004-135532 Voc 02!-MPERRY
~~
0376l>-Ol3-000-PDRI.28423
21-14
~
~.a
"I'" a.
0... III
"'0(,)
"IN
.....-a.
-.- .-
!!!Gl'=
:I:Ul-
><1Il1ll
W..cc:
Q. ...
Gl
-
c:
.
i" w ~ 00
~ rn m ~
J~ , w
. ro iii ~ ~ ~
0 ~
~
" ~ m 00 ~
. w ~ N
~ ro
. ~ m ~ N
~ a
~ 0 0
S . rn 00 . N ~
N N N
ro
. ~ Iii . :;; ~
~ 0 N
.
.. . ~ ~ N ro ~
C w ,
..
w ~
~
F
"
. U
. ~ j-
.
0 I . ,
~ ~ ~
i 0
.~ ~ .~
~ . ..
, ~ ~
" ~
: ~ N ~ .
~
~\~
j
",.-0 >.
~ ~- ~
"w~
Ul~
U
~ ~H~
[
~/;t
/~
ry/~
[. D I
Ga
G I,m
~G
G\
11 [i
rr I
~~
~
.
as w ~ .
u ~ ~ m rn
N w
U
. 00 0 00 0
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~
" a 00 a 00
. ~ ~ 00 ~
00
'0
" . 0 00 , 00
! ~ 0 ~ , ~ m
I
~
. 00 ~ w
. . . ~ w ~
~ .
.
~
. 00 00 , 00
~ 0 , w ffi
ro
~ . 00 ro .
~ ~ ~ 0
N
~
"
! u
0
~ '~
i u n
.;
, ~ ~ ~
" ~
: ~ N m .
~
.'Be .--
~ ~
~~~ 7~ ~
~f~!1 G. [. [I] N
.4?"" '" ~
<II co ,.., ..
o w ~ a:J
~j~ 'G' ~. ~
~ ~H~ ~\~ ~~ ~H~
g ~\\ /~
w
U
0:
W
..
r;lj~ ~19 ~~ ~ln
rn~ ~ ~[l!
- 4-----='--- ~ (I)
1 -=-~ -~. J
.. Cl "'.::
D:: ('l ..,. Ul
[}/~ ~ I !
" ~
~ @
~ ~
~o:!
d"
l!!
~::!
MCO'Q.
. .... l'll
N~O
..- ....-c.
-... .-
m::!'-
_01-
J:'t:I-
><=l'll
W::! C
m '-
.s
c
~ .! N 0 N 00 N
t~ ~ m 0 00
00 ~ 00
U
. ~ . ffi B ~
N
0 R ~
"
.
" ~ w ~
. ~ ~ N
!
~ . ~ ~ N !!
. j 0 ~ ~ ~
.
:
~ ~ " ~ 00
. . ~ ~
"
.
" N
, ~ ~ ~ ~
] 0 ~ N ~
m
~ ~ ~ ~ N
. ~
~ ~
0
~
0
~ U
~ ~. .
I ~ .~
~ .1 o ~
J u n
"
. I " .
~ ~
~ ~ 0 w
g ~ N ~ ~
i;
~f
[}/r
G
Ji wi
=+G '
.
~ 0
~a
G
~lrG
~G
~\
~ [Ill
+--- w
11 i
L:J ~
~~
G\
.f
~'8 ii
-si:3
UJ~
u
~ GHG
It
ry/~
'aG
. N m
. . ~
i~ ~ ffi ~ ~
U
. D 0 0 0
0 ~ ~ ~ ~
~
" 0 0 0 0
. ~ ~ ~ ~
. 0 0 00 0
~ 0 $ , ~ ~
N
! . N 0 ~ w
00 $ ~ ~
, D D , D
" 0 . , , m
E . rn ~ 00
i . rn D 00 N
~ ~ ffi ~
0 ~
0
.f
0
~ U
~ .
'" '~
.1 ! ~
l u
" I
~ .-
.
. " .
. ~
" ~ 0 ~
: ~ N ~ ~
i;
~\~ ~t ~
~\\ /~ c:.
~ ~ ~HJ
~ ~n~ ~\~ ~d ~l~
~ ~\\ /G
w
u
0:
w
..
~d ~\G
~l~ /G ~\\ ~nG
nla 11m
Wli rrw
1oY/~ ~ I!
l.J NO
q
~ '
."~
!:!i:;
~"o
.- -..
Re.
A summary of internal and external daily and peak hour traffic is provided below in Table 21-11,
Table 21-11
Internal/External Split - Vehicle Trips
Peak Hour
Vehicle Vehicle Peak Hour Vehicle
Trips (ADT) Trips (AOT) Vehicle Trips Trips
Phase Internal External Internal External
r!'bas~1 (2011) 23,753 44,113 3.915 2'04(}Q.
,..~..._-~
Buildout (2016) 41,090 76,312 6,697 4,107
D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the
highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If
these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS, state the source, date and
network of the model and of the T AZ projections. If no standard model is available
or some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include
documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and
distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at buildout and at interim
phase-end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or
improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs
and/or comprehensive plans to be constructed during DRI construction; however,
the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections
on maps or tables of the study area network, on map or table for each phase-end
year. Describe how these conclusions were reached.
Collier County Travel Model
Future year traffic volumes with and without The Town of Ave Maria were estimated
using the Collier County travel model, which has two-digit facility type codes. Input data
sets were developed by WilsonMiller for the Project phase-end years using the adopted
2010 and 2020 model data sets.
Socio-Economic Data
The zonal data for 2011 and 2016 were derived through simple interpolation of the 2010
and 2020 ZDATA and EETRIPS files provided by the MPO, The resultant ZDATA1 and
ZDA T A2 files were reviewed for reasonableness in the vicinity of the Project.
Some of the T AZs encompass whole or partial RLSA sending areas that will generate
the stewardship credits used to develop The Town of Ave Maria, Some of those sending
areas are already chosen, It was assumed that the remaining credits necessary would
come first from sending areas that generate the most credits per acre. TAZ dwelling unit
projections were reduced by one unit per five acres for the acres in the sending areas
that generated the credits,
7/1612004-135532 VerOll.'-t='ERRY
~~
0378f>.-013.-000-PDRI_28423
21-17
""
8e
.,~-
Existinq Plus Committed (E+Cl Road Network
Future traffic volumes, both with and without the Project, were assigned by the Collier
County travel model to the E+C road network, The E+C road network was developed as
described above under the Collier County Travel Model.
Travel Model Assiqnments
Traffic volumes for both 2011 and 2016, both with and without the Project, are based on
the FSUTMS travel model assignments, Under the scenarios with the Project, the traffic
on each roadway segment attributable to the Project was identified using select zone
analysis, The FSUTMS input and output files, both with and without the Project, are
being provided to the review agencies on the accompanying CD-ROM,
Future Conditions Without Proiect
Future Traffic Conditions Without Project for 2011 and 2016 are reported for significantly
impacted roadway segments in Tables 21-12 and 21-13, respectively. The K factors
used in these spreadsheets are the same as those previously described. The peak
season daily volumes produced by the traffic model were reduced to Average Annual
Daily Traffic (AADT) using a model output conversion factor (MOCF) derived from the
FDOT continuous count station in Collier County. The service volumes for roads
analyzed in their current configuration are from the Collier County AUIR and the Lee
County Concurrency Management Report. For improved roads, the Collier County
service volumes are the average of service volumes in the AUIR for facilities of the same
configuration,
Future Conditions With Proiect
Future Traffic Conditions With Project for 2011 and 2016 for significantly impacted
roadway segments are reported in Tables 21-14 and 21-15, respectively. The peak
season factors, K factors, and service volumes are from the sources previously
described,
1116/2004-135532 Ver02!....,ERRY
-
03786-013-000-PDRI_28423
21-18
'Be
Table 21-12
Phase 1 (2011)
Future Conditions Without Project
PSWT 11
Peak
Ho~
Peak Peak PeakDir-
Hour H~, .oad action
MDT Two Dmu PeakDI COnrlg- Service
Rood limits VI V2 Vavg. (2) Way (3) STAI (4) ectlo. uration Volume vie
Camp Keais Rd_ Oil Well Rd. 10 Ave Maria Entrance 10,000 8,900 819 626 0.77 631 2U 860 0.73
Camp Keais Rd. Ave Maria Entrance 10 Immokalee Rd. 8.500 7,600 699 626 0.77 538 2U 860 0.63
tmmokalee Road 00 Well Road to Wilson Blvd. 45300 34700 40,000 35,600 3275 586 0.65 2129 60 3190 0.67
Immokalee Road Wilson Blvd. 10 Collier Blvd. 53400 42700 48,050 42,800 3938 593 0.71 2796 60 3660 0.76
Immokalee Road Collier Blvd. 10 Oakes Blvd. 50100 39000 44,550 39,600 3643 656 0.64 2332 60 3500 0.67
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rd. 10 SR 29 23600 21400 22,500 20,000 1840 620 0.66 1214 2U 860 1.41
SR29 Oil Well Rd. to 1-75 6400 6300 6.350 5,700 524 615 0.54 283 2U 670 0.42
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 7200 24300 15,750 14,000 1288 665 0,54 696 2U 670 1.04
MainS!. (SR29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 36100 35600 35,850 31,900 2935 665 0.54 1585 40 1860 0.85
MainSt (SR29) 1st. St. (CR 846) to CR29A Sou\l1 26400 28900 27,650 24,600 2263 665 0.54 1222 40 1860 0.66
MainSt (SR29) 1st. St. jCR 846) to N 15\11 St. 25900 26900 26,400 23,500 2162 664 0.55 1189 40 1860 0.64
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Main St. to Immokalee Dr. 24700 23700 24,200 21,500 1978 683 0.52 1029 2U 860 1.20
N. 15th St. (SR29) Immokalee Dr. to lake Trafford Rd. 25700 26800 26,250 23,400 2153 683 0.52 1120 2U 860 1.30
N, 15th St. (SR 29) lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 26400 29900 28,150 25,100 2309 663 0.51 1178 2U 860 1.37
N. 15thSt (SR29) 29ANorthloSR82 28600 23900 26,250 23,400 2153 663 0.51 1098 2U 720 1.53
SR82 SR 29 to Lee County line 6000 6000 6,000 5,300 488 661 0.83 268 2U 720 0.37
Immokalee Rd. (SR 82) Hendry County line to Sunshine Blvd 17900 14700 16,300 14,500 1334 l22 0.62 827 2U 1170 0.71
North 1st. St. North of Main St. 8700 7200 7,950 7,100 653 590 0.86 562 2U 1000 056
Oil Well Road Everglades Blvd. to Immokalee Rd. 18,300 16,300 1500 724 0,56 840 2. 950 0.88
Oil Well Road AMU Entrance Road to Everglades Blvd. 12900 15600 14,250 12,700 1168 725 0.5 584 2. 950 0.61
on Well Road Cam" Keais Rd. to SR 29 3200 3400 3,300 2,900 267 WM2 0.63 168 2. 950 0.18
(1) FSVTMS A$$l<Inmenl VoIwnllS (V1 aoo V2) al th" """" oflhll segment (W more than on,,) are averaged
(2) PSWT oonvllfled to MDT with MOCf~O,89
(31 MDT convert"" to Peak Hour Two Way with K~O_092
'4'DiIIlcIiofIlIIS l~fromColllerCounlvorl""CounIvCounlstation
711612004-135532 Ver 02!-MPERRY
CAiUJ
03786-01J-{)()()..PDRI_28423
21-19
Table 21-13
Buildout (2016)
Future Conditions Without Project
RC--'\
PSWT(1}
Peak
Hour
Puk PeakDI,.-
Hour PeakHou Road octfon
MDT Two Omo PeakDif. Conflg- Service
RuO Limits V1 V2 Yavg. (2) Way (3) ST" (') ec::t1on uratlon Volume VI{;
Camp Keais Rd. Oil Well Rd. to Ave Maria Entrance 10,400 9,300 656 626 0.77 659 2U 660 0.17
Camp Kaais Rd. Ave Maria Entrance to Immokalee Rd. 6700 10400 8,550 7,600 699 626 0.77 536 2U 660 0.63
Collier Blvd. Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 43000 47500 45,250 40,300 3708 655 0.67 2484 60 3500 0.71
Collier Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd. 10 Pine Ridge Rd. 49700 50200 49,950 44,500 4094 536 0.64 2620 40 2180 1.20
Collier Blvd. Pine Ridge Rd. 10 Green Blvd. 37000 36800 36,900 32,800 3018 536 0.84 1932 40 2180 0.89
Everglades Blvd. Oil Well Rd. 10 Golden Gate Blvd. 5600 2900 4,350 3,900 359 636 0.58 208 2U 950 0.22
ImmokareeRoad Oil Well Road to Wilson Blvd. 44900 57800 51,350 45,700 4204 566 0.65 2733 60 3190 0.86
lmmokalee Road Wilson Blvd. to Collier Blvd. 54800 67600 61,200 54,500 5014 593 0.71 3560 60 3660 0.97
ImmokaleeRoad Collier Blvd. to Oakes Blvd. 51200 61400 56,300 50,100 4609 656 0.64 2950 60 3500 0.84
ImmokaleeRoad Oakes Blvd. to 1.75 NB 67,400 60,000 5520 566 0.53 2926 60 3500 0.84
Immokalee Road 1-75 NB to 1-75S8 59,300 52,800 4858 566 0.53 2575 60 3500 0.74
Immokalee Road Oil Well Rd. to Everglades Blvd. 21500 20700 21,100 18,800 1730 671 0.69 1194 2U 860 1.39
lmmokalee Road Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd. 24500 19800 22,150 19,700 1812 672 0.69 1250 2U 860 1.45
ImmokaleeRoad Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 26300 25500 25,900 23,100 2125 620 0.66 1403 2U 860 1.63
Golden Gate Blvd Wilson Blvd. to Everglades Blvd. 18,600 16,600 1527 652 0.69 1054 2U 950 1.11
1-75 5R29toCR951 31,200 27,800 2558 351 0.50 1279 4' 2020 0.63
1-75 Immokalee Rd. to Bonita Beach Rd. 43600 42100 85,700 76,300 7020 191 0.54 3791 4F 2940 1.29
Lake Trafford Road N.15th5l.toLakeTrafford 3700 18900 11,300 10.100 929 551 0.55 511 2U 760 0.67
SR29 OilWeJlRd.tol-75 10700 11400 11,050 9,800 902 615 0.54 467 2U 670 0.73
5R29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd. 37500 15500 26,500 23,600 2171 665 0.54 1172 2U 670 1.75
Main SI.{SR29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 52800 53000 52,900 47,100 4333 665 054 2340 40 1860 1.26
Main St. (SR 29) 1st SI. (CR 846) to CR 29A South 39700 41900 40.800 36,300 3340 665 0.54 1804 40 1860 0.97
Main 51. (5R 29) 1sl SI. (CR 846) to N 15th St 34900 34000 34,250 30,500 2806 66' 0.55 1543 40 1860 0.83
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Main St to Immokalee Dr. 27700 26000 26,850 23,900 2199 663 0.52 1143 2U 860 1.33
N.15thSt.(SR29) Immokalee Dr. to lake Trafford Rd. 30400 31600 31,000 27.600 2539 663 0.52 1320 2U 860 1.53
N. 15th St. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 32900 29200 31,050 27,600 2539 663 0.51 1295 2U 860 1.51
N.15thSI. (SR29) 29ANorthtoSR82 36600 30600 33,700 30,000 2760 663 0.51 1408 2U 720 1.96
SR29 North of SR 82 6,500 5,800 534 143 0.53 263 2U 720 0.39
5R82 SR 29 to lee County Line 27400 21700 24,550 21,800 2006 661 0.55 1103 2U 720 1.53
ImmokaleeRd. (SR82) Hendry County Une to Sunshine Blvd. 17,500 15,600 1435 L22 0.62 690 2U 1170 0.76
New Market 51. {SR 29 A) Indian RiverSt. to Main St. 13500 12100 12,800 11,400 1049 612 0.52 545 2U 1010 0.54
North 1st. St. NorthofMainSt. 11500 10200 10,850 9,700 692 590 0.86 767 2U 1000 0.77
Oil Well Road Everglades Blvd. to Immokalee Rd. 23,500 20,900 1923 724 0.56 1077 2R 990 1.13
Oil Well Road AMU Entrance Road to Evefglades Blvd. 19000 21100 20,050 17,800 1638 725 0.5 619 2R 950 0.86
Oil Well Road AMU Entrance Road to Camp Keais Rd. 19,000 16,900 1555 WM1 0.53 824 2R 950 0.87
Oil Well Road Camn Keais Rd. to SR 29 10000 10400 10200 9,100 637 WM2 0.63 527 2R 950 0.55
(1) FSUTMS Assignment Volumes (V1 and V2) a1lhe ends orllle$t!Qment (it' morethan one) are a_ged
{2) PSWT convened 10 MOT with MOCF..(J,89
(3)AADT converted to Peak H<;UI"TYl'O Waywilh K..(J,092
{41D1rectionalSDl~fmm CoIIierCounlv.leeCount . orFDOTCounlSlaIion
1/16J2004- 135532 Vo" 021. ~ERRY
~~
037!l6--013-000---PDRI-28423
21-20
-
~i
~"
~
UJ UJ UJ 2 2 2 z z z z z :;:: :;:: :;:: 3 3 3 3 3 (') (')
;u ;u ;u 0 w w w 3 3 3 3 3 w w
co trl trl :;; :;; '" " 3' 3' 3' 3 3
~ ;!i ;!i ;!i ;!i 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
'" ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A A A A A
" W W W W W ^ ^
;U ;U ;U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " " " w m
0 0 0 OJ OJ OJ m m m w w w m
m m w ~ OJ OJ OJ OJ :u :u :u :u :u :u :u :u ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" 0 0 0 0 ~ :u ;U
:u :u :u :u CB CB m m m w ~ ~ ..
'" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ
CB CB CB CB :u
CO
z .b!
0 "
;;
~
~ !::J UJ 2 (') (') m ~ z trl r 3 :;:: (') - - (') ;;; 2 (') I :t 2
'" !oj - :u :u w < 0 w m :u ~ ~ g m w
3 w " P A 3 3 'iF 3 ~
'" ~ " 0 ~ '" :;; CO .a c: ~ w 0 '" <;! 0 ::: ~ ~ :;:: :;;
;u ~ '" <D .. ~ z ~ ~ ~ -<
0 ~ c: ~ en Of m S. 0 '" A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
00 ...; a ^ ~ '" " w m OJ ^
~ w ...; a w r0- o 0 OJ w (') ;;;
. ;;: :u w ~ :;:: ~ if a UJ '" '" ;u w 0 :u
...; ^ . ~ I ~ w ~ w w 0 :u :u ~ ~ 0 ~ c m ~
0 '" w '" w 2 u; OJ ~ 3 a a. '" '3 s w ~
" '3 ,. ~ n co ~ a ~ '!
0 0 m '< a ;u .- m UJ :u ~ .. a :u .:< a
...; a 0 w 00 :;; ~ .. ~ :u ~ a 3 a 2) 2) 0 a ~ w 1-
~ ~ ~ '{ '" ~ :;:; :u 0 (') r ~
!::J ~ a a 0 co A m g ;;; a 3 n
e! '3 w ~ (') '" m '" a r w trl a a A w W w ....
w 3 0 ;u UJ '3 ~ w " Cll w ~. 'iF UJ :;:: i
00 ~ c UJ A (') Z m a a
< w '" ~ :u a w w 0 :u
0 $ ...; '" 3 ;u 8; ;u OJ OJ ~ '3 ~ ~
c S ~ '" 0 Q' '" -< '" '" ;!i .,. trl UJ ;;;'
< <D ~ .- OJ c
3 "- 0 r A <D UJ <D ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 m
w 0 C , w w p if ~ p .- m 0
m "-. 3 w " .a a. UJ ~ ~ ~ A '!
~ w m Of Z 0 , w m
.,. 00 :u ~ 0 ;u s w " ~
m w ~ w " ~ W n
til ~ '5 m ~ ~ OJ w
~ .- :u
0 OJ ~ ~
" " w .-
,; a ~ ~
~ ~ ~
0 <
w 0 !::J
'{ "- "- ::: ~ - - t;l '" Rl '" w '" '" .. '" .. ~ - '" ::; -<
w ~ Of en ~ " <D :oS 81 Hi " ~ Hl <D '" '" " 0 !a
m '" co '" '" .. en '" .. .. '" '" " '"
~ ...; w
~ ~ w -<
~ e! ~ IS ~
~
a m - ::: '" '" '" '" ~ w !;j !iJ .. w ~ - ::: ."
w :': ~ " 8 '" is " ~ '" ::! .. 0 '" .. .. n VI
~ 0 '" m '" " '" " .. 0 en .. " 0 c::
~ ~ - ii!
~ w '" a
a
a m a; u5 - - ~ '" '" '" w '" S .. .. w '" - a; C < .!!. VI
~ w III '" " '" co .. en ~ " Hl w " is " ::J 81 '!'
a ~ m w '" '" " w '" " " 0 " '" " '" "0
r 3 ~
w w - -
w - - '"
0 '" w - .. en .. en '" '" '" '" en en en en " w .. '" 0 ::;
0 " '", '", .", .~ .~ .", ... .w .w .co .0 b 'w '.. ~ ." .en .~ .w 0 <
c co ~ 8 ~ ~ :e: ~ gJ g;: .. 8 .. en :e: 8 '"
% 3 0 0 0 0 0 ~ CO
~ C
3 w - W " - :!1 3
0 Of w - w en .. en - .. .. m m en en " " .. en IS co ~
~ m .~ -" 'Ii; '" '::J '", '~ :oS CD " -1iJ -~ '- -gj -en CD -en -- -" ;;'
m ~ .. co l'3 ~ 0 :oS " ~ :,g :oS !:L
in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
~ -
e - - - < ~
~ w - w en :;;: en '" m '" '" '" en en en " w .. .. w CO en 3
w -", -ill -co -~ '10] '" "8 -co -co -:;: -~ -" -.. '~ 'en -0 '", -", .~ ~ n
w en .. ~ 8 ~ w gJ " ~ '" OJ ..
< '" '" 0 0 0 '" 0 '" 0 m '" '" 0 '" 0
w
~
~ ~ - '" w '" '" ~ I::J tl: - "0
w
~ .. '" '" '" '" w en '" 0 '" 0 w w w w ""VI
-", -0 -~ -", -co '8 ~ .@ -~ ~ " -ffi -8 -w '~ '~ .", '" -0 ~ w -~
~ ~ .. " l'3 .. " .. l'3 ~
0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 m m 0 m
- - - - - - '" t5 t5 w '" '" - :: :El~
w .. w '" '" '" '" OJ " co " " '" '" '" '"
-w -m -" -en 'en '" -.. -g;: -8 -8 -- -", -co -~ -", ." -", -- -~ w w
8 0 is 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 is 0 8 8 c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -<
- ~ - '" '" '" .. ::: 0; - - '" - - ~ '" '" - - :1:"0:"0 CO
'" ~ ~ ~ .. '" " '" '" ~ ~ " 0 - 0 ~ t;l I>> :E = CD
'" .. co " ~ " 0 " ~ w " - en '" c '" '"
.. 0 '" w .. .. '" '" 0 w " :!C1...~ n
...
en ~ en '" " " '" en en en en en en 8J ~ '" '" en en en VI a
~ en :;:: '" '" :oS en 10] co co en en '" III t5 10 '" '" E c
'" '" .. '" w w w '" '" .. w '" en en =
'" ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z -<
~
.. '" '" en .. '" III ~ ~ '" '" '" '" .. en ::! en en en =i '" m~ C '"
'" .. .. w .. 0 '" '" .. .. '" .. '" en '" " ~. ;!l
~ n
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :i~
'" 8; .. w HJ '" :;;: .. .. ~ .. .. .. m ~ ill ~ ~ w '" '" '"
m en " 0 <D <D OJ en en m OJ w w
W Z "0
Ii! '" ~ " .. ~ ~ ~ ~ !;l Gl ~ ~ ~ " 81 ~ ~ ~ =
'" ~ u: '" 8; ~ -<=-
.. .. " '" " co .. '"
m ~i
- VI
en 2l - - co " ~ " ~ is " " w .. . n 51
" ~ ~ w '" " Ii; ~ '" 0; Sl '" tl: " 0 en en
w .. .. 0 " '" '" '" co '" i; c
.. w ~'
n "0
co .. co w ~ '" - - w w u; - ~ w w " .. ~"tI::;l...
.. w - - w .. " w '" '" .. _CDi:>>a
;." w m w en ;." - m '" .. .. '" w '" ;." m en w m en W Ql ... :i CD
'g , ~ a
- ::;i::i-i:l:"O
u5 is ~ w g;: ~ '" ~ ~ w w w w ~ " ~ =i -0 ~ Ql l:Il E ~ g:
.. ~ co '" ~ .. " en ~ '" ::! '< Q ... R"
" W '" W " co '" '" '" w w '" " en w w n "0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z i.
co
m '" '" .. '" m .. .. .. .. & & .. m '" '" '" & '" .. '" m~ C l1.
'" '" '" co '" '" co co co co co '" '" '" '" '" OJ '" ~. -<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =:~ ~ iil
.. & .. '" .. & '" '" '" '" '" '" '" & .. .. .. '" .. '" .. ... ;!l
co OJ '" co '" '" '" '" '" '" '" OJ co co '" OJ '" co n
z
is - - .. .. w <:;j - - 0; u5 ~ ~ .. w .. - ~ .....
m is en '" " g: '" '" ~ '" " 'f ~ " -co
'" .. m 0 " '" m .. '" .. .. m 0 '" co m :a
is ::: w .. :;;: 0; 0; - ::: ::: w w I'; '" ::i~ if
~ .. co ~ en 8; " ~ 81 co co w m n 51
'" '" co " w " " " .. co '" " .. " '"
~ ~ :oS 81 en '" '" co '" ~ ~ III III III 8; .. l'J .. :;;: ::: - ~~ '!!!
" " .. " '" m w '" -
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .. .. .. en en en '" '" '" '" 51 b' '"
'" . co
c: c: c: :u :u ;u c: c: c: c: c: 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: c: c: c: O-'=QI
co .. ... .1:
= ,
=r- VI-.
(') (') (') 0 0 0 0 (') (') (') (') (') (') (') 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 :5.~~=-_3.
QeD a.gi~.
';'" - ,
<VI
" en en gj ~ gj " gJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ C1CDac""Cl:::"t1
l'3 " " ~ l'3 III III ~ ::: c:( . _. CD CI CD
0 0 0 0 0 is :oS 0 3n'~';'l=-5i=-
= =
",'C> ::;i ~ CD "tI ""
- co 0; .. '" en '" u5 '" '" - en - .. co ~ t5 C/l(D ~
.. co .. 0 0 " <D 0 0 W " '" Ql CI a CI CD
- W <co~ ~ :a...... .-'
;." .. '" '" '" .. 0 .. .. .. en .. - m '" 0 0 '" " _ CD 0 ';'" =-
s'a n !:L =
- - - - - - z
- '" '" ~
m '" " ~ '" ~ .. "" ~ -1jj '" '", -- 81 -- w '" c.... " ~ '"
" :oS '" co " '" ~ - ~ '" 0 HJ 8 m
w co en '" m " '" w " - en " w
- - - - - VI
- ~ ."
" '" '" 8j m HJ - 111 <D ~ '" -~ -0 -", -", -- " .. '" -
ill ~ Rl ~ w ~ '" '" kl ~ :,a ;J OJ ~ ~ ~ :I:
m w .. '" co '"
- 0 - 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 ~ I
0 ~ a; w '" en .. ~ - ~ w OJ '" 8J i"J '" '" tll en en '"
" w '" W <D - '" .. .. '" '" w w '"
.
a
~
~
N
~
,
N
~
."
C
-
C
;;
C')."
g:r-l
Q,1lI1l1
_.m 0-
cr.CD-
o ...11l
:l~",
Ill",'"
<o~
=:::~
:r-
."
...
.2.
11l
s:l.
CX)
CJ
Si'::'
~'~
b _
? Ii!
~ ~
~ ~
~ 'J
.
m
.
.
<
N
~
,
N
N
~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 3 ~ 2
r g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ g ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ! ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~
;~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q g ~ ~ ~ 0 [* ~ ~ j ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ rn Q 0 Q 0 ~ K Q ~ ~ 0 ~ OJ ~ @ 0
~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ! ~ 1 ~ W ; ~ ~ ~
$~~~ ;U~g~ ~ ~@'~Ol~~~ OlK[~~~i~~ i~~~~3~
.,~~ td3~a ~[%~~"- [~~!!J.~ rn.~il'~~~
~* ~~~ g22 ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~
~~ ~ i :r:s ~ K~ ~~~
~ ~
o b!
. w
~ 3'
" .
~ ~
" it
~
"
ro
~
~
~
~
"
~
o
o
ro
w ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
-l 0 Q
ii1 ~ "
~
<
o
E
3
*
~
o
~
o
I
o
~
S
o
~
~
o
i':
~
n
g
,
3
o
~
ro
;;;
-c::;i::,o
~ Ql .E.
~ ~ ~
::;i:l-l::C-C
CD ~ ~ t -~ ~ ~.:! ~ g ::
CD lJi CD CD U'1 n .., ~
~~~~2222
R3 ti'l t6 trl
~
'" '" '"
. . .
5 5 5"
~ ~ ~ ~
en en
'" '"
.tll .tll
;;
Ii'
~
'0'0
'" '"
rn rn
$$
rn rn
[ [
ij rn 1II
m w ~
~ ~ ~ t 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" ~ IJ; 0; 0; ~
w w .... J\.J .j>. ....
t.:l co ~
m ~ rn
ij ~
w rn
~ ill
m ~
to t5 I;:i ill
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * rn ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w .:.. ~ J\.J
~ ;]:j 2l :::j ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ffi ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
m .... <..0
-~ lR t;
o 0 0
~
o w
-.... ~
a 0
~ ~ jHl ~
00 0 ~ U'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ w
~ 8 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
III t
w U'1 CD ~
-~ -~ ~ ~
w ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ U'1 m ~ & ~
~ U'1 CD 0 W U'1 <..0 0 a
<:D t:j W <.l:l CD
-~~tl-88~
<.l:l CD .:::
~ ~ @
'"
~m
a
'.1) ~ 0
--... s;R
gs ~ -~
~ ~
a w <.D -"" "-'
kl ~ ~ ~
o a a a
~ ~ ~~ Iii
o ~ ~ ~ -""
-ct ~ 10 -lji W
o a a 0 a
~ w
Ill~ '~
~
~ rn ~
b. "~
o g: g;:
co '--..j <..0 CD
":
o
0;:J 0
W -"'-I
d :.g
~ ~
-~ ~
8 ~
w w
~~d
"
W
oJ
o
~l\l l\l
o 0
~
j
.
~
lJi .... 0 ~ W <..0 t::l
-tl;l-~-~~-~"~-~-~
w ~
fii ~
CD t::l ~
~1ll t
~ ~ ~
-~ -~ ~
CD <.0 (Xl ~ w c::J
".... ";; -~ I'J -f -t
U:l ..... a, U'1 U'1 U'1
w rn
~ ~ 8:!
~ rn
'5i ~ ~ ~
W "-l U1 U'1
~m'~\ii?J
~ w
-~ -~ .~
~ 0 ~ rn "-l CD ~ t::l t::l ~ ~ ~ ~ <..0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lJi CD ~ ~ W "-l ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ rn 8 ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m
~I'J '::J
~ w
."
:S'"
~~ ~ ~ ~
~~'~;~8~~~
~q:~~g~~
~ <.0 ~ -1>0 -...j 0 fj
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ g 8 ~ 8
~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ w ~ t::l ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ g g
8 ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.j>. U'1 m ~ _ N CD.j>. ~ lJi CD 0 N
lJi 0 2l 8-l ~
~8~8~~~
~ 'B
~ t
iJ\ ~
~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ffi ~ ~ m ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~
a a a a 0 0 0 0 a a a a a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 a a a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi m ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 D a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 pOD 0 0 0 a 0 0 a q 0 a a 0 a a 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ill 81 ijj
w
;j ~ iii ~ ~
U1 l-I<! N -..
~ ~ :,;:: R}
bl ~ ~
to ii1
f:j ~
t:'i ::::.! t:i ~
iB @ 81 $
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~
ill 0 rn
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ t5 'i2 ~
maw ~ -1>0 ~ ~ -1>0 "-l 0 N ~ ~ W "-loa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ U'1 N t ~ lJi 0 ~ t::l
w 0 ~ -...j a NOW .j>. m ~ 0 ~ -...j ~ ~ ~ -...j m ~ w <..0 ~ v' W ~ -1>0 u, -...j <..0 0 W
~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"w ~ ~ W ~
U'1 "'l 0 I'J W
~ ~ 8
DDoaaaDoaODDDaDaaDCloooaDDaDoooaDDDDD :z:
~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ & & ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ m~ ~
'"
S'
."
a
"
II
i
"
o 0 c::J c::J 0 a a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 q 0 0 0 ~~
& & & ~ ~ ~ & & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ & ~ & & & ~ & & & ~ & & & & & & ~ & c~
:::j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ III
$ ill ~
~ 8! ill ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 2; ~ ~
Iti ~
~ ~ ffi ~ ffi ~ t ~ ~ ~ 0 t
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5 is RJ :g ~
ffi ili
iJ\ "' I'J ~ III
~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ is is ~ ~ ffi ffi ~ ~ ~
~ ili :ll EJ I'J 8i ill
~ ~ t:'i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~
I:; I'J
~ 8 ~ ffi [{J
~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J\.J I'J ~ N "-l ~ ~ -1>0 J\.J lJi m lJi m m ~ J\.J J\.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .j>. .j>. m N N
C C C C ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c ceo DOC 0 0 0 oDe C C C ~ ~ ceo DOC C
n n n noD 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n noD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n rn 0 0 0 0 000
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ @ ~ ill ill
~ ~ ~ U1 ~ <.l:l ~ ffi ~ U'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ <.l:l ~ ~ ~ ~ CD W U'1 U'1 ~ 0 U'1 m lJi ~ ~
m CD U'1 CD m m ~ ~ -...j CD 00 00 00 ~ w U'1 ~ U'1 ~ <.l:l 0 <..0 W m U1 w 0 ~ -...j ~ CD
~ m
III ~
'2di ~ iHlt
~
-~ ~ ~ ~
z
~ ~
~~-~~-~~~~
'"
~
~
w ~ b
~ ~ i:j
~ ~ ~
ill"!~[H
w
-t -tB ~ -~ -~
m w~ 'ill -
~ ~m
o ~
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi
~ ~
~-~-~t]~~~
'::J '~[;i iii m
~ U'1 rn -~
CD lil :i: ~
'~HdHl
~~ i!l f
o 0 a 0 ODD 0 ~ 0 a p 0 0 ~ p 0 0 a ~ a p D
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R3 ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ @ ffi ~ ~
I
~
=>
i1
.
...
~
n
~
'"
!:i
..
'"
~
~
C
3
~
~
.
~ ~ ~ <
i
=>
"
.
~
"
o
..
~
-
~
~
<
.
"T1
C
..
C
Cil
(")OJ
OC-i
~ -'Ql
c.-
-. c. C"
cr.O-
o C (1)
~"N
Ul~""
""No
""C....
_...... c.n
...,.,
::T~
"'tI
...
.2.
~
!:l.
Z
m~
"
o
.
o
..
i
"
:e~
~
'"
S'
z
~
m
'"
~
."
o
...=-
~il'
" ~
~
z
~
m
"",
-0
" .
.....
-=
!Il"
n ~
:E~
~~
~Q;;cJ
;. ~ ~
:; ~ a..
.,,'"
<CIl~~~
~ ~ s. =- =-
~ Q ~ !2;:
~ 5;
:IE
!;
n
1
CO
C':)
i
,
Be'..
The results of the intersection capacity analyses for Future Traffic Conditions With
Project are presented below in Tables 21-16 and Table 21-17. The detailed intersection
capacity analyses are provided in Appendix 21-2,
Table 21-16
Phase 1 (2011)
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Future Traffic Conditions With Project
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
No Improvements Improved
Worst Movement (Un- Worst Movement
Average Signalized Only) (Un~Slgnallzed Only)
Level of
Service Delay Move. Delay Delay Move- Delay
Intersection Type (LOS) (See,) ment LOS (See,) LOS (See,) ment LOS (See,)
Immokalee Rd, at f-75 Southbound O..Off Ramp S F 85,8 0 40,1
Immokalee Rd, at f-75 Northbound O..Off Ramp S B 19 B 16
Immokalee Rd. at Oakes BI\od. S E 74,1 D 46,1
lmmokalee Rd at Collier BI\d. S 0 41.7 D 35,1
Immokalee Rd. at Wilson Blw. S F 235,3 B 18.4
lmmokalee Rd. at Randall BI\d. S C 30.4 A 9
lmmokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd. S C 28,6 B 12,7
lmmokatee Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U F 220,9 WB F 933,3 B 19.9
Immokalee Rd, (1st. St.) at SR 29 (Main St,) S E 57 0 39,8
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St, S B 18.4 B 18.4
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Immokalee Dr. S B 18,5 B 18,5
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Lake Trafford Rd, S F 80,9 C 29.7
Oil Well Rd. at Ewrglades 81\0. U F 133,1 NB F 624,5 B 14,2
Oil Well Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U A 9,1 SB B 13,3 A 9.1 SB B 13,3
Oil Well Rd. at Camp Keais Rd. U A 8,5 SB C 23,1 A 8.5 SB C 23,1
Oil Weil Rd, at SR 29 U B 21,6 EB F 65,8 B 11.4 EBL E 45,5
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U F 255,6 EB F 536,9 C 23,2
Collier Bha. at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. S F 278,1 C 28,5
Collier Bhd. at Golden Gate Blw. S C 24,2 C 24,2
Collier BI\<:I. at Pine Ridge Rd. S E 79,6 D 49,9
7/16i2Q04.-135532 Ve,: 02!. MPERRY
CAN'
03786-ll1:l-OOO-PORI_28423
21-23
'8C
Table 21-17
Buildout (2016)
Intersection Capacity Analysis
Future Traffic Conditions With Project
PM Peak Hour, Peak Season
No Improvements Improved
Worst Movement (Un-
Average Signalized Only)
Level of
Service Delay Move- Delay Delay
Intersection Type (LOS) (Sec,) ment LOS (Sec,) LOS (Sec,)
Immokalee Rd, at 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramp S E 79 C 34.7
Immokalee Rd. at 1.75 Northbound On/Off Ramp S C 27,1 B 16,6
Immokalee Rd, at Oakes Blvd, S F 120,9 D 52,8
Immokalee Rd at Collier Blvd, S E 66.1 D 43
Immokalee Rd, at Wilson Blvd, S F 345,7 C 31.9
Immokalee Rd, at Randall Blvd, S E 66 A 9,1
Immokalee Rd. at Oil Well Rd, S E 55,9 B 17.6
Immokalee Rd, at Camp Keais Rd, U F WB F C 26.2
Immokalee Rd. (1st. St.) at SR 29 (Main St.) S F 176,1 D 54,3
Main St. (SR 29) at Ninth St. S D 37,3 D 37,3
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Immokalee Dr, S C 26,9 C 26,9
Fifteenth St. (SR 29) at Lake Trafford Rd, S F 155.4 D 49.4
Oil Well Rd, at Everglades Blvd, U F NB F B 19,6
Oil Well Rd, at Ave Maria Entrance U F 369 SB F 833 B 16,1
Oil Well Rd, at Camp Keais Rd, U F 146.4 SB F 410 C 21.4
Oil Well Rd, at SR 29 U F EB F B 15,9
Camp Keais Rd. at Ave Maria Entrance U F EB F D 35,9
Collier Blvd, at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. S F 459,1 D 40,9
Collier Blvd, at Golden Gate Blvd, S D 42,8 D 42,8
Collier Blvd, at Pine Ridge Rd, S F 93.4 D 48,9
7/1612004-135532 Ver 02!-M'ERRY
-,
03786-(113-000-PDRI-2f1423
21-24
"'Be
E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) and (C) above and
show, on separate maps or tables for each phase-end year, the DRI traffic on each
link of the then-existing network within the study area. Include peak-hour directional
trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the
project and local jurisdiction, For the year of buildout and at the end of each phase
estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI tripsltotal peak
hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI tripslexisting peak
hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the
study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for
the regionally significant roads.
Tables 21-14 and Table 21-15 summarize the Project's peak hour traffic on roadway
segments in the study area for Phase 1 (2011) and Buildout (2016), respectively, Also
included in these tables is the Project's traffic as a percent of the maximum roadway
service volume at the adopted level of service standard.
As noted previously, the Project traffic on roadway segments was estimated using select
zone analysis of the FSUTMS travel model assignments with the Project for both 2011
and 2016.
F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (D) and (E) above, what modifications
in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each
phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service
standards? Identify which of the above improvements are required by traffic not
associated with the DRI at the end of each phase. For those improvements which
will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where
applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g.,
signalization, one-way pairs, ridesharing, etc.) that will be used and any other
measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due
to a large number of truck movements.
Improvements
According to the DCAlDRI Transportation Uniform Standard Rule (9J-2,045), a Project is
found to have a significant (and adverse) impact on a State or regionally significant
roadway if it is found to meet both of the following criteria: (1) the Project will utilize 5
percent or more of the maximum peak hour service volume at the adopted level of
service standard; and (2) the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted level of
service standard,
A review of Tables 21-14 and 21-15 indicate several roadway segments that will be
significantly and adversely impacted by the Project at the end of Phase 1 (2011) and at
Buildout (2016), These roadway segments will eventually need to be improved (or
alternative routes provided) to accommodate general growth in the area, These
improvements are included in Tables 21-18 and 21-19
7/1612004- 135532 lilY. 021- MPERRY
~~
037ll&-01J..OOO.-PDRI-28423
21-25
'ac
Table 21-18
Phase 1 (2011)
Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements
E+C
Config- Improve-
Road Limits uration ment
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rd. to SR 29 2U 2to4D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) Main SI. to Immokalee Dr. 2U 2to4D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr, to lake Trafford Rd, 2U 2t04D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) lake Trafford Rd. to SR 29 A North 2U 2t04D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) 29A North to SR 82 2U 2 t04D
SR29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd, 2U 2t04D
SR82 SR 29 to Hendry County Line 2U 2t04D
Table 21-19
Buildout (2016)
Impacted Roadways Needing Improvements
E+C
Contig- Improve-
Road Limits uration ment
Collier Blvd, Golden Gate Blvd, to Pine Ridge Rd, 4D 4D to 6D
1-75 Immokalee Rd, to Bonita Beach Rd, 4F 4F to 6F
Immokalee Road Oil Well Rd, to Everglades Blvd, 2U 2 t04D
Immokalee Road Everglades Blvd. to Camp Keais Rd, 2U 2 t04D
Immokalee Road Camp Keais Rd, to SR 29 2U 2 t04D
Main SI. (SR 29) CR 29A South to 29/846 Split 4D 4D to 6D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) Main SI. to Immokalee Dr. 2U 2t04D
N, 15th SI. (SR 29) Immokalee Dr. to Lake Trafford Rd, 2U 2t04D
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) Lake Trafford Rd, to SR 29 A North 2U 2t04D
N. 15th SI. (SR 29) 29A North to SR 82 2U 2t04D
SR 29 CR 846 to Oil Well Rd, 2U 2t04D
SR29 Oil Well Rd, to 1-75 2U 2t04D
SR 82 SR 29 to Hendry County Line 2U 2t04D
7/1612004-135532 Ver'02!-t.PERRY
~~,
03786-01:J..{100-PDRI-28423
21-26
'ae
The significant and adverse impact on the segment of 1-75 from Immokalee Road to
Bonita Beach Road is due in part to the use of the LOS "C" standard, when considering
that the commitment from the State to improve 1-75 is not until 2008. The planned
widening to at least six lanes will provide sufficient service volume to eliminate the
deficiency, even at LOS'C".
A number of intersection improvements will be needed to support the Project and
general growth in the area through 2016,
Recommended intersection improvements for Phase 1 (2011) and Buildout (2016) are
summarized below in Table 21-20 and Table 21-21 respectively.
111612004- 135532 VeL 02!-IvIPERRY
~.,
037ll6-013-000-PDRI-28423
21-27
!l
c
Q)
E
Q)
>
o
'-
c.
E
~-
O....c
....0
NO._
.N....
....~U
N G)
Q) .... '"
-Q)'-
.otnS
I-ca ca c
.r=-
D..'t'
G)
't'
C
G)
E
E
o
u
Q)
a:
= it' "J ! ! i , , ! , ~ ~ 'O ,
H , ei ei ui ,
;; ~ ,
Q . N ~
'" !
~.. Q , CD <-> W
..~ ~ : , ,
;;~ . l! : CD CD ~ ,
r ~ OJ OJ CD ,
W
,
. it' IT!i , 01!
l! " ~ 0 ~ ~i 0 ~ m ~ 'O r--.-i 0L ~ 'O ~ 'O N m
~ ~ ;; . 0 ~ 00: ~: roc '" ~ 0); '" ~ ~ g): ..,j, '" m ~ rrii <ri ... m
Q l!! ~ ~ .......i ~ .....i ~ l'l, N N ~
~ ~ '" , ,
j Q 0 CD 0: 0; rot 0( CD rni " CD CD 0; OJ, 0( 0( CD 0; <-> <-> "
~ ,
. , ,
i , ,
>- 1:, ,
" CD '0' 1-:
~ W OJ; >-
0 -" 0); ! CD
.c . J ...-1 OJ
~ 1i 0 CD +l -
" z' >-' al! <1>: +
~ 1-; J
I J . .. (I): . m OJ! CD . m CD' ~: . m CD ';.!~ m m >-
CD
CD o. Ci ~ 0 0 21 W 0 o. w, Cii: 0 0 W (ij"; 0 0 Z
W 0: 0; ;:;;! 0 0 .-; ~ 0 0, --, c: 0 0 ~ 1,:;; ~ 0 ~
Zi z: Z Z +( z z, = z z = z
~ . ~i ml + + m: + (iH +
0
.5 0 "Oi ~! J
:;: , CD
. Z
m <::; , ,
:;; 0:: = ! "
~ OJ: (i); !
Z,
<-> ~, , ,
+ !
it' ~ ~, - (T), 0 ~ [ [ 'O
; .. to: ~i IE: '" ~ <ri
Q l!! ""'", N
. :g i i
E 0; 0: Wi 0( CD <->
J ~
0::. a: , i , + +
CD' CD . : a: a: a:
1-, >- s:: s: >- m CD CD
" , ; ~
~ i 1Il; ~i +, + CD , " :" >-
,,: 1--; OJ + : m
f- + m
. OJ, CD N (Ill .i . .' ., ., m .' . .' >- ... N . .
. 0 + + s:i s: + 0' o. 0 0 0 0 0 c, 0 <::i m >- CD + 0 0
~ 0 0; 0; 0 0 0 ~i 0 0 0 0, ~ ~ 0 0
z >-' 1-; 01, N >- z' zi z z; z z Z' Z Z' Z -' Z Z
.. !D; CD +, + CD , + N N m
0. ]; W' Wi 1-; Z + , 00
.c '+! '+; !Di >- ';' , -' -' ~ ~
CD , m
~ wi W ~ ~ CD
01; , :"
+' ';' , +
,
i~ it' "J [ , (T')! ; ! I~ ~ m m'
, ffi! ~!
;; ~ , : R1i ei ~ 'O
Q i : Ni CD
,
'" , [ I ' ~[
. Ii Q u..: CD 0; ~ u..;
1! ~ , ! "'
. , [ : , I
E ;;in ~ l! ; 3[ mj CD ffii CD CD' "
~ ~ ~ , z en W Wi .
, 0
" , a:
]; ~ ~j f'l' en! - lO: - ~
i 0, -, ~ ~ CD C!! ~. 'O' m L.Oi CD N. CD .
0 ~ cr:i; -.ii ~! or ~, a::ii ~: g, ~ ~ lril m -.ti R "
~ 1,1'), :;; fO i'il N' m m N I.{}, ~
z CD! .....! I'--i Nt Ni L.f)! ...-i ~ N N .....i E
, E
j ~ B , , 0
~ , , f!
~ ~ u...! lDi wi " lL..: <-> <-> ~' W OJ! co; u.! ~' 0( 0( CD lL.; ~ <-> W
, .
'" ! :;;
~ '" ~
. , , , ,
~ Uli UJ! cr.Ji en ('J)! en en ::J! (I:Ji wi en OJ ::J: => =>; => =>; OJ OJ OJ 3
, [3
0. 0. ,
Ei E: , , ~
.. Ill, 0
0::: 0:::' , Ui! "
It:::i 11=: <->
0: !;2' , 1::, -0 lD, E
-, , "'! a:
Ci o. i5 u, ,g
0: Oi ::::!' ~' o.
, q &! . ~: ~ ~
~. m! , .
<::, -0' -0, ~: u C, '" .
=n <::i n:! N, . .' " {; -0 >
" O:! t=: -0 -0' Wi > "iij
c ~: 0' -OJ -0; ~ ~ "~j ~! 2; '" ~i ~ ffi -0
=' 2 Wi ud " ~
0 ~i 4':; > ~ 2;' CD '" ~l E' . CD ";::; m a:
tl ffi! -'" ocd 101 ~ W ~, ...; CD . .
1:::; CD ~: .< . .' :2i " .g "
. 0; 0, Ul! c:, " .. ~ 4':, -" ., ~ Q)'
~ Wi Z' Q); ~ 0; ~ s: 9-i O' 15' ~' "~ ::::(; Q)' ~ '" .
. LO' LOi .:<:; .!:!!: 0 E' 05; :21 " <; 0 Q' E
. ~ 01 ~ '" c.; m
II ~! ~: '0 3" (5 ; 6;' pt N ~ . ~
0 '" 1O! E' ~ .
<-> 1;;j N' Jii ~ ~. '" 10: 0 ~ 0 ~
1iI! 10' liIi " " lOj C! .
. " ij a: a:: [ Ui OJ -0, > 0:
-0, -oj -0; ~ -0' ~ ~ ~, -OJ ~ ~ CiO: " CiO, " 0:' " " " .<
"" 0:' a: '" 0::; '" a: 0::[ O::! 0::; "~: ~
Q); Q)' ~: . ~; . . Q)i .' ~ Wi 1i5 rr!: Ii' -0. ei' l1:l! -0 -0 -0 .
Q)! . . . . . ~: n:! m' > > > E
Iii! Iii' Iii, ... ... I: ..., ~j 05: ~: ~i - .. m! .. ::::(: ffi ffi ffi E
~, ~. ~ ~ ~, ~ -""i <::, .. Ei ~ ~ j1 ~
0; 0' 0 0 0; 0 0 E! 0 0' . .. s:i " s: "
Ei Ei E; E E: E E El Q)e Q)'
Ei E E' E E! E E E' Ej "(5" <!::i 4;::, 6 (5 6: (5 n:I; " 0 " a:
~i It..-i U:::: 0: <-> <-> <->
'8C
co
N
,
~
N
~
.
.
~
~ ;
. ..
> .
o
" .
~ 8
~ ~
~d
U)
-
I:
Gl
E
~
Q.
E
~-
co
............1:
No,2
. N_
......-U
N_Gl
Gl j U)
-0'"
..Q:E.!!
1Il._ I:
~j-
In'C
Gl
'C
I:
Gl
E
E
o
U
Gl
a::
o
'E
~
E
~
!
...
~
.5!
9
'"
..
"
~
o
i
~
..
E
l!
I
"
.
d:
"
~
o
'E
o
E
~
!
:i
o!
=-i'
'E ~
~~
H
ii .liP
~en
~
~
if
j
"0_
_.~ en
~CDg
~en-
~u
~~
en
o
~
i
E
~
..
E
~-
" ~
QI1l
en
o
~
'E
o
E
~
..
E
~u
G3~
Q-
en
o
~
''E
h
i'
~~
!
~
.
tl
~
~
~
J;
...
~
'"
"'
"'
() CD
...
CD
W
~
~
o
"
.J
CD
W
m
o
o
m
~
o
~
~
()
m
o
o
Z
~;
~i
....-i m
~i ~
wi
j
Ui I.L.
WI UJ! en
oJ
E!
~
0::1
l:ei
01
1"
0:
'"
E
~(
It=t
01
1"
01
-0;
0'
::1;
~\ -0
-.C; J:';.
1::1 IT)
or (t)
z; ~
~! 0
1ii[ (;51 1ii
-oi
O'
:::Ii
0;
~,
..c;
51
01
Wi
~I
~i
m
wi
(ii'
~
0,
Ei
1',
TI' -u
0:::: a:::
Q); Q)
wi CD
(0: (ij
~i ..:.::
01 0
Ei E
E: l'
m
N
'"
o
.J
~
+
.J
m
w
+
'"
.,;
"'
w
...
m
5
+
...
m
w
"
o
'"
~
en, .-
r;:;j 0)
o
u; c:{
,
m
o
o
Z
2;
~i
-8;
c5!
z;
wi Q)
a..i t;:
;;::, 0
-00: z
~i
-oi
0,
rol
gji
Zi
-,
+,
o
'"
~
~: .-
8)] cr)
o
LLj <.(
,
...
m
5
,
,
,
cd n:::
lIli l!l
5: $
+i +
1-1 I-
mr 1Il
~: ~
~i ~
lD! Iii
Wi w
~i ~
,
+
...
m
w
"
18
...
.,;
~
'"
w
~
CIJ
CIJ
,.
iij
-ri
>
iij
o
o
!!!
~
]
"
()
"
~
0:
.
m
"
~
o
E
l'
"
-ri
0:
m
m
"
~
o
E
l'
o
<ri
"'
w
CIJ
~
>
iij
"
~
o
~
0:
"
-ri
0:
m
m
"
~
o
E
l'
"'
...
,
Nl (Y')
wi ....
N] l[)
m
uj 0
,
,
,
.J'
ffil
+
1-1 ~
ffil ~
m
o
o
Z
-'
+i .-
all +
N!
-=i
(0,
5i
Wi
'"
...
m
'"
,.c
'"
o
o
~
o
Z
m
l<i
()
.
o
o
Z
~
'"
~
,
to!
~!
,
1 i
.....: ....'
~~ N!
o
i i
rni III! ui CD
0:
m
;;::
+
...
m
CIJ
Q)! .-
I'll
rot
0'
'"
i:i)i
+
...
m
Z
+
...
m
CIJ
N
+
...
m
Z
'i'
! i
,
olD! ml W Q) Q) Z~o ~
1:;1 t;:; t;: t: c ~
0; 01 0 0 0
zi zi z z Z
! i
,
~
,
:
LLj
~i
m
.,;
'"
j !
,
-'
i .1
i lD!
; ......1
-,
; i
(Ylj
r-.:j
(1")]
en!
~:
w
; !
l.L.1lJ....1 OJ " lL..!
, ~
; i
i i
CIJ
=:.'
-ri
0:
,
,
,
.....
en!
i si
,~
-0: mi
0:::: Ni
00: O::!
"(ij; wi
~f ro:
Qjri
EI <i5!
<<I' I
ui u;'i
...
5
is
"
1ii! ~
-ri
0:
.
m
"
~
o
E
l'
-0:
a:::!
m!
wi
Ill:
~!
Ei
E:
,
(1): m!
i .
-01
Q:i
all
~!
~l
~!
C'f.E
-.e,
~!
a;-i
(1Ii N!
0::::
~
u5;
-.ee
E
me
.
'"
i..i::
~
0::::
~
en'
S:~
~
::2:(
en! en:
Ci'
m,
0);
1ii;
~,
o.
E'
~:
~~
me
m'
~; 1I;i ]~
rn
0:;:
.Ii:
,
lL.i u..! LL!
~l ~i ffi~
~i
I,{) [
I,{)!
, ; ,
~, ~! ~,
i ! i
co' ~: "I
,~1 !
~i
"E:
~i
~,
~!
...::.::i
~,
---I;
O)i
N;
0::
~ 'liij (;:j
(1)-': -0'"0.-0:
o::! 0::' a:i
:E! 0)' OJ 0)'
~, ~: ~, ~I
~i 6; 6: 0:
-l!
! (]J'
Wi
+i
m;
N!
1iii
0'
rn
Of
,
,
; i
("1'
~i
,
0:
j 0);
~i
,
.'
Wi
c::
~;
E1
Wi
~
'i:;'
a:li
~[
m
~'
m!
~i
0'
'"
mi
,
mi
c:i
0'
zi
0!1
01
;;;:~
'<ti
to!
:!:
i
-01
Ct::!
.~:
:::Li
oj
Ei
(11 [
u!
....;
(01
.J
1m
iT"""
+
....J
! (D (]J
Zw
+ +
.J...
mm
ZCIJ
++
, m
! .!::!
"
o
~
()j
'"
.,;
.
o
o
Z
~
m
w
~
"
'"
N
0:
CIJ
"
-ri
0:
...
~
6
m
i!J
0:
c6i
Zi
-'
+:
~!
(11:
0'
rn
en:
.
-'
~ + tii
N-'W
+ ~":
o:~~
ilD CD
w. W
mi.-a::.....
6! + CD +
zi bJ~25
w, z
:tii:
ffi~tii
~ + ~
.
~
m,
Wi
~ ~
" (I)
(D!
U
c:!
~!
'E,
wi
(1Ii
i:;,
~i
Q)!
>
<C
mi
-0:
0:'
m:
iii
m
,",'
oj
E'
~,
o!
'"
\iI
o
m
o
o
Z
'"
D
~
o
'"
'"
~
-ri
0:
~
u
.
m
CD
i5
;;;
~
o
.
>
"
-ri
>
iij
~
"
()
p
'"
N
~
m
~
o 0
...
m
CIJ
+
...
m
z
m -
~ +
z oS
Z
+
...
m
w
+
m m
o 0
o 0
Z Z
'"
N
~
~
!!!
E
E
o
\;'
~ 00
o
.
0:
(f) .e
o
o
()
..,
ei
'"
'"
CIJ
.
~
"
()
E
o
'"
~
m
>
.~
~
00
"
.
E
m ~
c: g
0:. "E
"
~
>
m -0
m 0:
~ ~
d'
o
m
~
"
'"
"
~
.
E
E
~ ~
8 ct
-ri
>
iij
~
"
()
-ri
"
m
RC
m
N
,
~
N
-;;
1:3
'5
a:
~
.
w
.
, "
: ~
> .
N ~
~ ~
~ "
~"~
:::~8
Traffic Mitiqation
"8 C'~-
The Town of Ave Maria will mitigate its traffic impacts through the payment of road
impact fees and the construction of site-related improvements, Road impact fees have
been estimated at approximately $87,6 million through buildout. Collier County requires
that 50% of road impact fees be paid at the time of approval of a site development plan
or subdivision master plan, and the remainder paid at the time of issuance of a building
permit (or within three years if no building permit has been issued). Therefore, Collier
County has these funds available significantly in advance of the time when actual
. impacts occur,
In addition to the payment of road impact fees, the applicant has also committed to
provide road right-of-way adjacent to the applicant's holdings along Oil Well Road
(approximately 3 miles) and Camp Keais Road (approximately 5 miles). Sufficient right-
of-way will be provided to accommodate the future 6-laning of both highways. Although
the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance provides for the granting of road
impact fee credits for such donation, the applicant has agreed to provide such right-of-
way without credit to road impact fees,
The Project will construct site-related improvements at The Town of Ave Maria's access
points onto Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road. They include the following.
. Oil Well Road - Westbound Left-turn Lane
. Oil Well Road - Eastbound Right-turn Lane
. Camp Keais Road - Northbound Left-turn Lane
. Camp Keais Road - Southbound Right-turn Lane
Additional site-related improvements at secondary access points will be provided
consistent with County standards,
The applicant will also be responsible for a proportionate share of any traffic signals that
may be warranted in the future,
G. Identify the anticipated number and general location of access points for driveways,
median openings and roadways necessary to accommodate the proposed
development. Describe how the applicant's access plan will minimize the impacts of
the proposed development and preserve or enhance traffic flow on the existing and
proposed transportation system. This information will assist the applicant and
governmental agencies in reaching conceptual agreement regarding the anticipated
access points, While the ADA may constitute a conceptual review for access points,
it is not a permit application and, therefore, the applicant is not required to include
specific design requirements (geometry) until the time of permit application.
The Project's access management plan will minimize the impacts of the Project on the
adjacent roadways by limiting access to one primary access point on Oil Well Road (a
secondary access connection may be appropriate) and two planned access connections
to Camp Keais Road, These are shown on the Master Plan for the Project (Map H),
The access connections will meet proper spacing guidelines and are intended to be full
median openings when Oil Well Road and Camp Keais Road are multi-Ianed,
7/1612004- 135532 Ver; 01!- MPERRY
~
03786-013-000.-0
21- 30
"Be
H. If applicable, describe how the project will complement the protection of existing, or
development of proposed. transportation corridors designated by local governments
in their comprehensive plans. In addition, identify what commitments will be made
to protect the designated corridors such as interlocal agreements, right-of-way
dedication, building set-backs, etc.
The Metropolitan Planning Organization, on June 11, 2004, amended the MPO's Long-
Range 2025 Financially Feasible Plan to incorporate both Oil Well Road and Camp
Keais Road. The applicant has committed to protecting that portion of the right-of-way
within the corridor adjacent to the applicant's holdings along Oil Well Road
(approximately 3 miles) and Camp Keais Road (approximately 5 miles). Sufficient right-
of-way will be protected to accommodate the future 6-laning of both highways. The
applicant has agreed to provide such right-of-way to the County without credit to road
impact fees,
I. What provisions, including but not limited to sidewalks, bicycle paths, internal
shuttles, ridesharing and public transit, will be made for the movement of people by
means other than private automobile? Refer to internal design, site planning,
parking provisions, location, etc,
With the Ave Maria University and the Town CenterlCore as the foundation, The Town of
Ave Maria is being planned and designed to be a truly "walkable community", Inherent
in the design concepts of The Town of Ave Maria is the commitment to promoting
efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within the development. All elements of
design, from the land use design and master plan layout, to the street cross section
designs; every aspect of Ave Maria is tailored to the pedestrian. Even the hierarchy of
street design is based upon the pedestrian as the primary user of the street system.
Sidewalks invite the resident or visitor to walk from place to place along narrow,
landscaped streets, some with on-street parking and streetscaping amenities that will
both encourage and comfort the users, The typical university landscape, commonly
found as a bicycle/pedestrian-friendly environment, will be enhanced at Ave Maria
University by the compact grid-based design philosophy incorporated into a pre-planned
campus environ, A network of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure has been designed
to encourage maximum utilization in and between Town and University. Certain design
features in the University go so far as to prohibit specific travel paths by auto use while
encouraging pedestrian/bicycling-only travel. Walkinglbiking pathways throughout the
university and town are intended to "connect" one with the other.
While at a minimum, the Applicant will comply with applicable bicycle and pedestrian
regulations in the Collier County Land Development Code, in addition, the University,
commercial and recreational facilities provided within The Town of Ave Maria will
promote independence from the private automobile and discourage external trip making,
The Town Centers will provide retail and service establishments on site to encourage
bicycle and pedestrian travel within the community and to capture those convenience
type trips that would otherwise be making vehicle trips on Oil Well Road, Camp Keais
Road and Immokalee Road.
From SWFRPC Supplemental Questions and Clarification:
Prior to answering DRI Question 21, a meeting with review agencies should be held to
discuss the applicant's assumptions and proposed methodology. A letter summarizing
7/1612004-135532 Ver 01!- MPERRY
~.,
03186-013-000---0
21- 31
"8r
these assumptions and the proposed methodology for answering question 21, must be .'.
provided to review agencies at least one week prior to this meeting. All parts of Question
21 and the following Supplemental Questions should be answered by the applicant unless
specifically excluded at the DRI Preapplicant Meeting.
A. The initial applicant analysis should be based on the existing plus committed (E+C)
road network. Any improvements required in addition to the E+C network should be
addressed in answer to DRI Question 21.F.
Please refer to response to Question 21,A and Question 21,F,
B. The peak hour and daily analysis should be based on annual average conditions and
any traffic counts should be appropriately adjusted to reflect these conditions,
Please refer to response to Question 21,A and Question 21,D,
C. Please provide a table showing the phased breakdown of the DRlland uses, the trip
generation rates, and the cumulative trips employed in the transportation analysis.
The applicant's analysis should assume 100 percent occupancy of all DRlland uses.
Please refer to response to Question 21,B and Question 21.C.
0, Passerby capture should not be used when a regional systems model is used.
When a regional systems model is not used, passerby capture should not exceed
10% of adjacent roadway traffic and 25% of project external trip potential.
No additional "pass-by capture", beyond that provided by the FSUTMS model was
incorporated into the analysis,
E.1. Indicate the peak hour trips and ADrs by phase for major internal DRI roads.
The only "major" internal DRI roadways are the Entrance Roads, Table 21-22 indicates
the ADT and peak hour peak directional volumes for the two entrance roads by phase,
Table 21-22
Entrance Roads Daily and Peak Hour Peak Direction Volumes
Peak Hour Peak Hour
FSUTMS Peak FSUTMS Peak
Entrance Road AOT ITE ADT Direction AOT ITE AOT Oirectlon
From Oil Well Road 16,980 --.!!,223 484 28,070 28,245 783
..
From Camp Keais Road 26,510 26,890 756 47,770 48,067 1333
Total 43,490 44,113 1,240 75,840 76,312 2,116
1/16/2004- 135532 Ver: 01!- M"ERRY
~.,
03786-013-000--0
21- 32
....
Describe fully the methodology used to distribute and assign traffic to the highway 8 C
network.
E.2.
Please refer to response to Question 21.D and Question 21,E.
F.1. At a minimum, a 1985 HCM operational analysis should be performed for
significantly impacted intersections during the first five years. A planning analysis
of impacted intersections should be performed for phases beyond five years and
intersections projected to be near capacity or over capacity should be indicated,
The use of the Critical Movements Analysis in Circular 212 is not acceptable, The
applicant should provide worksheets showing existing conditions, and projected
conditions without the DRI and with DRI traffic, indicating what improvements will be
necessary.
Please refer to response to Question 21,D and Question 21,F,
F.2. The standard used to determine regional significance of DRI impacts is 5% of daily
level of service "C" capacity for road segments, 5% of peak hour LOS C for rural
intersections, and 5% of peak hour LOS 0 for urban intersections.
Please refer to response to Question 21,D and Question 21,F,
F ,3, Please indicate whether the planned improvements or new facilities made necessary
in whole or in part, as a result of this project, have an existing funding source.
Please refer to response to Question 21.F.
F.4. Please indicate, for those improvements which will be required due to the DRI and
which are not currently funded in a recognized transportation planning program, to
what extent the applicant will commit to fund the needed improvements.
Please refer to Question 21,F,
G. If a bikeway system is proposed, please indicate its route.
Please refer to response to Question 21.
7/1612004- 135532 Ver: 01!- t.PERRY
~.,
03788-<l13-QOO._O
21- 33
... 8 C'''. ....
PART V. Human Resource Impacts
QUESTION 24 - HOUSING
A.1, If the proposed development contains residential development, provide the following
information on Table 1 for each phase of the development.
Table 24.A-1
Dwelling Units within the Community
Estimated Number of
Tenancy and Type Housing Cost Dwelling Units
(median)
Owner Occupied
Single-Family $320,000 Phase 1 - 3,980
(Range $195,000 to $500,000) Phase 2 - 2,896
Owner Occupied
Multi-Family $215,000 Phase 1- 1,730
Phase 2 - 1,394
(Ranqe $125,000 to $300,OOO)
Rental
Multi-Family Phase 1 - 300
One Bedroom $650 - $850/mo. Phase 2 - 700
Two Bedroom $850 - $1,100/mo
Three Bedroom $1,100 - $1 ,400/mo
Total 11,000 units
A,2. What number and percent of lots will be sold without constructed dwelling units?
What is the extent of improvements to be made on these lots prior to sale?
It is anticipated that the majority of land will be sold by the applicant to individual developers
without dwelling units constructed on the individual lots. Prior to the sale of a single-family
home site to a residential user, improvements required by the State and Collier County will
be in place for that building phase, These improvements generally include the necessary
infrastructure and access.
A.3. What will be the target market for the residential development (break down by
number, percent and type the number of dwelling units to be marketed for retirees,
families, etc.) What portion will be marketed as second or vacation homes?
The Town of Ave Maria will contain a variety of housing opportunities including single-
family, condominiums, villas and multi-family dwelling units. The single-family and multi-
family market conditions will determine this breakdown, but it is anticipated that the target
market will be as described in Table 24,A-2 below. It is estimated that as many as 30% of
the single-family units, and as many as 30% of the multifamily units, may be second or
vacation homes.
7f23J2r:xJ4. 135535 Vef; 01!- MPERRY
-
037BO-01:J..OOO.-PDRI-26423
24-1
8e"'-'
Table 24,A-2
Target Market
Type of Resident Number Percent
Empty Nesters/Retirees (1) 3,850 35%
Families (2) 5,500 50%
Singles (3) 1,650 15%
Total 11,000 100%
(1) "Empty nesters" are typically full-time working individuals whose
children are no longer living with them, "Retirees" are typically not working
individuals, and typically do not have children living with them,
(2) "Families" have school-age children, and typically work full time,
(3) "Singles" are unmarried persons.
B. Indicate and discuss the availability or projected availability of adequate housing
and employment opportunities reasonably accessible to the development site,
Housing opportunities should be described in terms of type, tenure, and cost range
and location within the following circumscribed areas: adjacent, two miles, five
miles, ten miles, and within the local jurisdiction or county. Employment
opportunities should be described in terms of two digit SIC code numbers located
within the local jurisdiction with estimated distances or transit times to the
development site,
At the pre-application conference on May 19, 2004, Regional Planning Council staff and the
applicant agreed that the applicant would not conduct the ECFRPC methodology for the
project.
The Town of Ave Maria is planned to provide a wide range of housing and employment
opportunities for its residents within the Town, In the vicinity of the Town, the communities
of Immokalee, Orangetree, and Golden Gate Estates provide a wide range of housing
options, and Immokalee also provides employment options. Each of these communities is
within a ten-mile/twenty-minute commute of the Town and also recognized as providing a
substantial portion of the work force housing supply in Collier County, as land and home
prices are significantly lower than those in the coastal communities of Naples and Marco
Island.
Ave Maria University is expected to be the primary source of jOb creation in the Town in the
early years of its growth, As the Town and University grow, customary support services
and facilities will be established to support the Town and University's population base, The
allocations of retail, service, office and other nonresidential uses planned within the Town
have been carefully sized to reflect the anticipated needs of the Town's residents, and also
meet all the applicable guidance of Collier County's Growth Management Plan/Rural Land
Stewardship Overlay,
7/2312004- 135535 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~,
o:l7ll6-013..QOO-PORI..28423
24-2
8e..
The planning for the Town has taken into consideration its relatively remote location from
existing urban areas, and the anticipated demand for housing to support the faculty, staff,
and administrative employees of Ave Maria University. As undergraduate students are
required to live on campus, dormitories satisfy their housing needs. Graduate students will
have the option of living on-campus or off-campus in apartments, condominiums, single-
family homes, or guest homes, Faculty and staff will be able to select from a full range of
housing options throughout the Town, depending on family size and lifestyle preferences.
The same holds true for employees of other businesses that will be established in the
Town. Because of the reasonable home pricing expected in the Town, we anticipate an
adequate supply of housing for the majority of people choosing to live in the Town. We also
reoognize that many of the jobs that will be created, particularly in the service sector, will be
considered to be low-income jobs,
Fortunately, the existing work force in Immokalee, Orangetree, and Golden Gate Estates
are available to fill many of these jobs, and the location of the Town is in much closer
proximity than existing job opportunities in the coastal region, Some of these service
sector, low income jobs will also be filled by part-time university student employees,
Historically, up to 40% of students are expected to work on a part-time basis, both on and
off campus. Recent studies also indicate that many people retired from full time
occupations will seek part time employment in the service industries.
Notwithstanding the existing supplies of work force housing in the vicinity, and the expected
expansion of such facilities over time as demand for such housing is created by the town
and university, the applicant is committed to working with affordable work force housing
providers and developers in the area to ensure that the work force housing supply is
increased over time. There are a range of options currently being explored and the
applicant is committed to the provision of work force housing both on-site and in the
neighboring Immokalee area. Options include both for sale and rental product on-site at
work force market rates; while off-site options include assisting not-for-profit entities with
site acquisition and possible alliances with for-profit work force housing providers in the
area,
There may be other possible solutions to this issue that are currently unknown, but the
Applicant agreed at the DRI pre-application meeting to work with the County and Regional
Staff to find suitable affordable housing solutions in the area, The SWFRPC Staff did
request that the applicant not conduct the typical ECFRPC methodology for the Town of
Ave Maria DR!.
C, If displacement or relocation of existing residents will occur due to the proposed
development, identify the number of people that will be affected, any special needs
of these people, and any provisions for addressing the effects of the relocation or
displacement of these people, particularly in regards to their ability to find suitable
replacement housing.
There are no existing permanent residents on the site.
712312004- 135535 Ver. 01!- MPERRY
~
03786-013-OQO.PDRI-2B423
24-3
'8e
QUESTION 25 - POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
A. If police/fire services, facilities or sites will be dedicated or otherwise provided on-
site, describe them, specify any conditions of dedication and locate on Map H,
The Immokalee Fire Department will provide fire service and police protection will be
provided by the Collier County Sheriffs Office, Discussions have been held with the
Immokalee Fire Department, Collier County EMS, the Collier County Fire Code Official, and
the Collier County Sheriffs Office to obtain their input on the initial and permanent needs of
each organization to service the proposed development. During the initial stages of the
development of Ave Maria, temporary facilities will be provided on-site for police and fire
protection personnel and equipment so that these services are available immediately.
Permanent facilities will be provided and are proposed for location in one of the community
facility (CF) districts indicated on Map H,
The closest existing fire station to the site is located in Immokalee at 502 New Market
Road, The travel distance to the site from the Immokalee Fire Department is approximately
8,5 miles via Immokalee Road and Camp Keais Road, The nearest sheriff's and EMS
substation is located in Immokalee at 112 South 1st Street. The travel distance to the site
from the existing sheriffs and EMS substation is approximately 8,0 miles via Immokalee
Road and Camp Keais Road,
AMU plans to provide on-campus security 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, Based upon
the anticipated enrollment, the ratio of student to security personnel will be
approximately 1 :650 which is in keeping with other institutions in Florida,
Security Officers will be unarmed unless a contract is entered into with the Collier
County Sheriffs Department to provide on-campus security, AMU is currently discussing
options with the Sheriff's Department. If AMU establishes an in-house security staff or
contracts with a licensed security service, their personnel will be unarmed.
All students, faculty, and staff will be oriented to call 911 in the event of an emergency,
They will be further instructed to make a second call to the security office which will be
required to respond to the incident for a follow-up investigation, The security staff will be
the first called on non-emergency incidents. This policy ensures that the Collier County
Sheriffs Office central dispatch center does not get secondhand information and will
help avoid the chance of error. The ability of the campus security dispatcher to assess
the original call ensures that the appropriate first responders are dispatched. Ave Maria
University intends to rely heavily upon student life staff to impose strict adherence to
University Policies applicable to student conduct.
AMU's intentions are to utilize foot and bicycle patrolS on campus, augmented by
vehicles when required,
J6I2004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
"-
03786-013-()(l().PDRI-2842J
25-1
..
Be
B. Provide correspondence from the appropriate providers acknowledging notice of the
proposed development and phasing, and indicating whether present facilities and
manpower are capable of serving the project or specifying the additional
manpower/equipment necessary to serve the development. If the provider is from
another jurisdiction, the letter should also identify any non-facility-related problems
in providing said service.
Letters of request of service availability from Collier County EMS (Attachment 25,B-1),
Immokalee Fire Control District (Attachment 25.B-2), and the Collier County Sheriffs Office
(Attachment 25.B-3) have been requested and will be provided upon receipt.
1612004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
-,
037B6-013-000.PDRI-28423
25-2
WIlSOnMlller
...
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
"Be
June 10, 2004
Attachment 25.B-1
Mr. Jeff Page
Collier County EMS
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. H
Naples, Florida 34112
Subject:
Ave Marla Town and University
Service Availability Request for ORl
Dear Mr. Page:
The Ave Maria University and New Town Development is a proposed university and oornmunity
development located in northeastern Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp
Keais Road, The project is proposed to oonsist of the Ave Maria University Campus and
oompanion residential and oommercial developments and associated amenities. Please find
enclosed a copy of the site and location maps indicating the general location of the subject
project,
On behalf of our client we are hereby requesting that your office review the enclosed site and
location maps and issue a Letter of Service Availability for this project at your earliest oonvenience
to accompany the DRI submittal for the project,
If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to oontact me at (239)
649-4040.
Sincerely,
~;;;/~(P~/k
Project Manager
25-3
Enclosures
Cc: Donald R, Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P.E., Barron Collier Companies
John English, P.E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller
Offices slraleglcally localed 10 serve our cllenls 800.649.4336
NaplesICorporale OffIce 32fX) Bailey Lane, SUite 200 . Naples. Florida 34105 . 239,649,4040 . Fax 239,643,5716
wllsonm/ller.com
lI/8I2OO4- 1384n Vel: ou.. CPAJER
~ECOR-"""
WlIsOflMfll8r.lnc. - FL Lie.' (C-C000170
WIIS(JnMlller
New Directions In Planning, Oesign & Engineering
-R~--
June 10, 2004
Mr. Raymond Alvarez, Fire Chief
Immokalee Fire Control District
502 East New Market Road
Immokalee, FL 34142
Attachment 25.B-2
Subject:
Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DR!
Dear Mr. Alvarez:
The Ave Maria University and New Town Development is a proposed university and community
development located in northeastern Collier County, north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp
Keais Road. The project is proposed to consist of the Ave Maria University Campus and
companion residential and commercial developments and associated amenities. Please find
enclosed a copy of the site and location maps indicating the general location of the subject
project.
On behalf of our dient we are hereby requesting that your offioe review the endosed site and
location maps and issue a Letter of Servioe Availability for this project at your earliest convenienoe
to accompany the DRI submittal for the project.
If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact me at (239)
649-4040,
Sinoerely,
~OC. ~(Ic-
em. J. ""I". P.~
Project Manager .
Enclosures
Cc: Donald R. Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P.E., Barron Collier Companies
John English, P.E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry, WilsonMiller
25-4
OffICB$ s/ra/eglcally loca/ed /0 66rve our cllen/s 800.649.4336
NaplesICorpora/e Offlctl3200 Bailey Lane. Suile 200. Naples, Florida 34105 . 239,649,4040 . Fax 239,643,51/6
wflsonmlller.com
6/1012004- 138477 Vel': 011- CPkER
-
03186-33C).(lOl).ECOR-21968
WlfsonMfllllf,Jnc. _ FL LIc" LC-COOOI70
WllsonMlller
..
New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering
8e
.... .....
June 10,2004
Attachment
25.B-3
Sheriff Don Hunter
Collier County Government Complex, Building J
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
Subject:
Ave Maria Town and University
Service Availability Request for DR!
Dear Sheriff Hunter:
Ave Maria is a planned town and university proposed to be developed in northeastern Collier
County on approximately 4,995 acres, consisting of 11,000 residential units, and including
amenities such as golf courses, community club/village centers, and commercial areas with
approximately 1,200,000 square feet. The development of the PDA phase of the project is
scheduled to begin in the fall of 2004 witlh the opening of the University campus and the initial
occupancy of the residential and commercial areas scheduled for the fall of 2006. The
development of the DRI portions of the site are anticipated to continue t1hrough 2016.
The project is located in Sections 31, 32, and 33 of Township 47S, Range 29E and Sections 4,
5,6,7,8,9, 16, 17 and 18, ofTownship 48S, Range 29E in Collier County, The project is
located between Immokalee Road and Oil Well Road, west of Camp Keais Road. Access
points to t1he project will initially be provided from Oil Well Road with an additional access from
Camp Keais Road to be added in the future. For your reference, a copy of the project location
map has been included with t1his request.
As part of t1he DRI ADA, Question 25, Police and Fire Protection, written acknowledgment from
your office is required stating that your organization will be able to provide police service to t1he
project, Your written acknowledgment of service availability correspondence will be
incorporated into Wilson Miller's ADA submittal.
We intend to submit t1he ADA on or before July 23, 2004; t1herefore, your prompt reply is
appreciated. If you have any questions or require any additional information feel free to contact
me at (239) 649-4040.
Sincerely,
(!;t;;/nc.
Craig J. paj~7;;
lac-
Enc:
Ce:
Donald R. Schrotenboer, Ave Maria University, Inc.
David Genson, P .E., Barron Collier Companies
John English, P,E., WilsonMiller
Margaret Perry. WilsonMiller
Offices $/ra/eglcal/y IDca/ed tD urve Dur cl/en/$ 800.649.4336
Naple$/CDrpDra/e Omes 3200 Bailey Lane. Suite 200. Naples. FlOfida 34105 . 239,649,4040. Fax 239,643.5116
wll$Dnmll/Br.cDm
25-5
6I10f.l004..138478 Ver.Otl-CPA..ER
-
~ECOR-27968
WIf$onMJlItJr,/nc. - FL Llc1 LC-COOOY10
QUESTION 26 - RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Be
.<A,oi,
Existing Level of Service: NIA
Adopted Level of Service Standard: per the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Overlay requirement for a town, 200 square feet of community park land per dwelling unit and
open space minimum 35% of SRA
Level of Service After Project Buildout:: LOS will meet or exceed the requirement of the RLSA
A. Describe the recreational facilities and open space (including acreage) which will be
provided on-site. Locate on Map H. Identify which of these areas or facilities will be
open to the general public.
The Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2,27,1 0,A,1,e requires that 35% of
the gross acreage (that area of development within an SRA that requires the consumption
of stewardship credits) of an SRA town consist of open space. Ave Maria will meet or
exceed this requirement. Open space will include active and passive parks, golf courses
and trails, lakes, and wetland preserves, Map H indicates wetland preserves, parks, and
lakes, but does not delineate other open space uses such as golf courses and open spaces
within individual tracts as the,
B. Will the development remove from public access lands or waters previously used by
residents of the region for hunting, fishing, boating or other recreation uses?
Specify.
No, lands are currently not accessible by the public,
C. Will parks and open space be dedicated to the city or county? If not, who will
maintain the facilities?
Parks and open space will be owned, operated and maintained by the Ave Maria
Stewardship Community District or the developer or master property owners association,
D. Please describe how the proposed recreation and open space plan is consistent
with local and regional policies.
The Town will adequately address requirements of both the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and the Strategic Regional Policy Plan (as adopted in 2002) of the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council.
The Regional Policy Plan (2002) contains policies relating to the preservation,
enhancement, and maintenance of wetland areas, The Town will preserve, enhance,
and maintain 62 acres of wetlands.
The Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2,2,27,1 O,C,1, requires that towns
shall have community parks with a minimum of 200 square feet per dwelling unit in the
112~- 135536 Ver. 01'. MPERRY 26-1
-
OJ18lJ..01Hl(lO.PORI.2B423
"'Be
town. This yields a total community park acreage of 50.5 acres. The Master Plan for the
Town of Ave Maria provides two community parks totaling 61 acres, A number of smaller
neighborhood parks will also be incorporated into individual neighborhoods.
The Town will also adhere to section 2.2.27,1 O,J.6.b of the Collier County Land
Development Code requiring that a minimum of 35 percent of the SRA land (that area of
development within an SRA that requires the consumption of stewardship credits) be
devoted to open space.
E. Does the project have the potential for impacting a recreation trail designated
pursuant to Chapter 260, F,S., and Chapter 160-7, FAC.? If so, describe the
potential impact.
The Town of Ave Maria will not impact a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter
260, F,S., and Chapter 16D-7, FAC.
-''-~ 135536 Ver:Ol!-MPERRY
"'
'66-013-000-PDRI.2842J
26-2
r'8C
QUESTION 27 - EDUCATION
A. If the development contains residential units, estimate the number of school age
children expected to reside in the development. Use class breakdowns appropriate
to the area in which the development is located (specify on chart below):
Table 27.A-1 indicates the number of students expected to reside in the Town and
distributes students by elementary, middle and high school.
Table 27,A-1
School Age Children By Level
Total Student Generation
K-5
35%
870
9-12
32%
796
Total
2,487
Notes:
11,000 residential units, population of 24,281 residents, population and distribution is
based on 2000 Census and from population studies of similar communities.
B. Will school facilities or sites be dedicated or otherwise provided on the site?
Both a K-8 public school and a K-12 private school are planned for the Town of Ave
Maria. The K-8 public school site(s) will be provided to the Collier County School
District. The sites will be located in the community facilities district (CF). The School
District collects a school impact fee of $1,778 per single-family unit and $827 for each
multi-family residential unit. Total school impact fees generated from The Town of Ave
Maria will be approximately $15,6 million. The K-12 private school will have a design
capacity of 900 students. The K-8 public school site will accommodate facilities with an
estimated capacity of 2,100 students (900 students in K-5, and 1,200 students in 6-8),
C. Attach a letter from the appropriate school board, acknowledging receipt of the
estimated school age population information in (A) above, and providing a statement
of what capital improvement adjustments would be necessary to accommodate
these students.
Attached is correspondence to Mr. David Lesansky, Facilities Coordinator for the Collier
County School District (Attachment 27.C-1) requesting verification of seNice to the Town
of Ave Maria, The letter of response will be provided upon receipt.
l3/2004. 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~
037ll&-013-DOO-PDRI-26423
27-1
~8C
Attachment 27.C-1
June 15,2004
Mr. Dave Lesansky
Director of Facilities Planning and Construction
Collier County Public Schools
5704 Cougar Lane
Naples, FI 34109
RE: Town of Ave Maria DRI
Dear Mr. Lesansky:
WilsonMiller is pleased to represent the Barron Collier Company in its submittal of the Town of
Ave Maria Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Town of Ave Maria contains
approximately 4,995 acres and is located north of Oil Well Road and west of Camp Keais Road.
The Ave Maria University is within the Town, The University is the first major Catholic University
to be built in the United States in more than forty years, The campus site was donated by
Barron Collier Companies and will become a center of educational, intellectual and spiritual
activities within the Town, The Town will be a compact, sustainable, mixed use community, with
significant open space throughout.
The Town of Ave Maria is being developed pursuant to the Collier County's Rural Lands
Stewardship Area Overlay in accordance with the goals, objectives, and policies contained in
Collier County's Growth Management Plan, and the development standards contained in the Land
Development Code.
At buildout, the Town of Ave Maria is anticipated to include 11,000 residential dwelling units,
690,000 square feet of retail/service, 510,000 square feet of office, 400 hotel rooms, the 6,000-
student university, 450 units of assisted living facilities, 148,500 square feet of civic, community
and miscellaneous facilities, 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, a K-12 private school, and
uses customarily associated with a town, such as golf courses, lakes, open space, and community
support facilities, and those uses customarily associated with a university such as student and
administration housing, recreation and sports areas, and support facilities, Buildout is anticipated in
the year 2016, A K-8 public school facility is also planned for inclusion,
As part of the DRI Application for Development Approval (ADA), Question 27, Education,
acknowledgment from your office is required stating that Collier County Public Schools can
adequately serve the Town of Ave Maria DR!. Your letter will be made a part of the ADA
submittal.
Your prompt reply is appreciated, Please contact me at 239-939-1020 if you have any
questions,
Sincerely,
WilsonMiller, Inc.
Sharon Jenkins-Owen, AICP
Project Planner
611512004- 33178 Ver: 02!- SJOw&n
,-
Z5555-555-555--0
27_ 2
'ac
QUESTION 28 - HEALTH CARE
A. Describe the health care services and facilities that will be required to meet the
health needs generated by this project. Please provide a letter from the various
providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and ability to serve
the project.
As indicated in Table 28.A-1, approximately 76 acute care beds and 187 long term beds
may be needed to accommodate the project. Attachment 28.A-1 is a letter from Edward
Morton, CEO of NCH Healthcare System acknowledging their ability to provide health care
services to the Town of Ave Maria,
North Collier Hospital, located on Immokalee Road at the terminus of Goodlette-Frank
Road, is approximately 20 miles from the subject property,
The Town plan has included 35,000 square feet allocated to medical facilities and doctors'
offices and medical-related services are a permitted and expected use within the office
allocations in the Mixed-Use districts.
Table 28.A-1
The Town of Ave Maria
Project Demand for Health Care Facilities
Projected Population Projected Acute Projected Long
Estimated Population 65 and Older * Care Beds Term Beds
24,281 8,485 76 187
Per the Health Planning Council of Southwest Florida's District 8 Health Plan 2003-2006, demand
ratios are as follows:
Acute Care Beds - 3.13 beds per 1,000 population
Long Term Beds - 22 beds per 1,000 population for age 65 or older
2312004-135536 Ver.Oll-MPERRY
,~,
037B6-013-000-PDRI.28423
28-1
Healthcare
System
----
Attachment 28.A-l
North lrSpC
11190 Healthpark Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34110
(239) 513-7000
Naples Campus
350 Seventh Street N.
Naples. Florida 34102
(239) 436-5000
NCH
<:-~~.~
Ms. Margaret Perry, A.I.C.P.
Land Use Planner
Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane at Airport Road, Suite 200
Naples, FL 34105
RECEIVED
WILSON MILLER
JUN 1 8 ~
I
-
June 16, 2004
FOLDER##
Dear Ms. Perry:
This letter is to verify that Naples Community Hospital along with its North Collier
Hospital affiliate are capable of providing healthcare services to Ave Maria University
and the Village of Ave Maria.
If! may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 436-51 13.
Sincerely,
~/'~t/k(//2/~
~A. Morton
CEO
28-2
www.NCHmd.org
QUESTION 29 - ENERGY
'ac
D. Describe any energy conservation methods or devices incorporated into the plan of
development. What considerations relative to energy conservation will be
incorporated into the site planning, landscape, and building design, and equipment
and lighting selection for this project?
From SWFRPC Supplemental Questions and Clarification:
As an option to responding to this question in its entirety, please respond to
question D. Provide a response in the following or a similar format, with those items
appropriate (residential vs. nonresidential) to that as follows:
The Town of Ave Maria will incorporate the following energy conservation features:
a. Provision of a bicycle/pedestrian system connecting all land uses, to be placed along
arterial and collector roads within the project. This system is to be consistent with local
government requirements.
b. Provision of bicycle racks or storage facilities in recreational, commercial, and multi-family
residential areas.
c. Cooperation in the locating of bus stops, shelters, and other passenger and system
accommodations for a transit system to serve the project area.
d. Use of energy-efficient features in window design.
e. Use of operable windows and ceiling fans.
f. Installation of energy-efficient appliances and equipment.
g. Prohibition of deed restrictions or covenants that would prevent or unnecessarily hamper
energy conservation efforts (e.g., building orientation, clotheslines, and solar water heating
systems).
h. Reduced coverage by asphalt, concrete, rock, and similar substances in streets, parking
lots, and other areas to reduce local air temperatures and reflected light and heat.
i. Installation of energy-efficient lighting for streets, parking areas, recreation areas, and other
interior and exterior public areas.
j. Use of water closets with a maximum flush of 3.5 gallons and shower heads and faucets
with a maximum flow rate of 3.0 gallons per minute (at 60 pounds of pressure per square
inch).
k. Selection of native plants, trees, and other vegetation and landscape design features that
reduce requirements for water, fertilizer, maintenance, and other needs.
--"2312004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
w
,7!lfi.-013-000-PDRI-28423
29-1
Planting of native shade trees to provide reasonable shade for all recreation areas,!S C
and parking areas.
I.
m.
Placement of trees to provide needed shade in the warmer months while not overly
reducing the benefits of sunlight in the cooler months.
n.
Planting of native shade trees for each residential unit.
o.
Orientation of structures, as possible, to reduce solar heat gain by walls and to utilize the
natural cooling effects of the wind.
p.
Provision for structural shading wherever practical when natural shading cannot be used
effectively.
q.
Inclusion of porch/patio areas in residential units.
r.
Consideration by the project architectural review commitlee(s) of energy conservation
measures (both those noted here and others) to assist builders and residents in their efforts
to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development.
The incorporation of those energy conservation measures in this Development of Regional Impact
does not preclude the provision of additional energy conservation measures by the applicant. It
also does not prevent the local govemment of jurisdiction or any state, regional, or other agency
under whose jurisdiction this project falls from requiring additional energy measures or measures
that may be more stringent.
,312004- 135536 Ver. 011- MPERRY
.,
.78Q.01Hloo. PORI. 28423
29-2
"'Be
QUESTION 30 - HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
A. 1. Describe any known historical or archaeological sites on the development site.
Provide a letter from the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources
(DHR) which includes a list of known sites within the development site, the
likelihood of historical or archaeological sites occurring within the development site,
whether a site survey is needed, and whether any known sites are significant.
DHR requested that a cultural resource assessment survey be conducted for the Town of
Ave Maria. Please refer to Attachment 30-1, a letter from Janet Matthews to Ross Morton,
dated November 3, 2003.
A.2. If DHR recommends that a site survey be done, the results of such a survey,
conducted for the development site by an acceptable professional, should be
provided.
Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) prepared and submitted a cultural resource
predictive model: Ave Maria University Collier County, Florida to DHR, in January 2004.
The predictive model was approved by DHR. Please refer to Attachment 30-2, a letter
from Frederick Gaske to Marion Almy dated February 4, 2004.
Based on the approved predictive model, ACI conducted a cultural resource assessment
survey (CRAS) of the Ave Maria Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) in March and
April 2004. This CRAS was approved by DHR as indicated in Attachment 30-3, a letter
from Frederick Gaske to David Genson dated April 21, 2004.
ACI submitted an Addendum to DHR for review and approval on July 20, 2004. This
Addendum completes the cultural resource assessment effort for this project. Due to the
size of the documents, copies of the CRAS and the Addendum are not included with this
submittal; however, the applicant will provide copies to individual reviewers upon request.
B. If significant historical or archaeological sites exist on-site, indicate what measures
would be taken to protect them, or to minimize or mitigate impacts to them. Where
appropriate, describe the measures for providing public access to the sites.
Based on available data from the Florida Master Site File (FMSF), one historic property
was recorded within a portion of the Town of Ave Maria. The Second Seminole War Fort
Doane (8CR660) is recorded as a general vicinity site in the southeast quarter of Section 6,
Township 48 South, Range 29 East. Systematic and intensive metal detecting and
subsurface archaeological testing was conducted in this area. As a result of this effort, no
evidence of this resource was found. Additionally, no other archaeological or historic
resources were discovered within the Town. Thus, it is the opinion of Archaeological
Consultants, Inc. (ACI) that development of this property will have no effect on any
archaeological sites or historic resources that are listed, determined eligible, or considered
potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP.
~312004- 135536 Ver. 011" MPERRY
W
J786-013-0Q0-PDRI-28423
30-1
"ae
Nonetheless, New Town Development, LLLP recognizes the importance of Seminole War
history to Collier County and southwest Florida. Therefore, the developer, in cooperation
with ACI, Mr. Ron Jamro, Director Collier County Museums, and other interested parties,
will continue researching Second Seminole War fortifications and encampments in Collier
County and the project vicinity. This research and the historical data included in the cultural
resource assessment survey report and the Addendum will be used to develop text for a
historical marker commemorating Second Seminole War activities, which will be placed at
an appropriate location within the Town.
-",312004-135536 Ver: 011_MPERRY
~
78&-013-()OO.PORI-28423
30-2
,
Attachment 30-1
1l.~'.-';'"
..~' "~" ,",
{'I . ..
.."
~' 1
.,
~'. .,,><f.
"'A.~'i;' <./...
RECEIVED
WILSON ?^
NOV 11 fbo3O C
I
.
- -
--
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ST ATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DMSION OF HISfORlCAL RESOURCES
FOLDER#.
Mr. Ross Morton
South Florida Water Management District
Lower West Coast Regional Service Center
2301 McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
R.e: mlR"N"ci: 2003-=9474/ Received by DaR: Septemoed 8~ 2003 ~ TI/<t/B
Application No. 030910-14
Applicant: Barron Collier Investments & Barron Collier Partnership
Project: Ave Maria University and Town / Collier County
~: '1>o.....:J,. ~~
1"-. J~$
November 3,~ ~~
~...4.~~
~~
'*
Dear Mr. Morton:
Our office received and reviewed the referenced project in accordance with Chapters 267 and
373, Florida Statutes, Florida's Coastal Management Program, and implementing state
regulations, regarding possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the
National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological
value. The State Historic Preservation Officer i8 to. advise and assist state and federal agencies
when identifying historic properties, assessing effects upon them, and considering alternatives to
avoid or minimize adverse effects.
A review of the Florida Master Site File and our records indicates that there are no recorded
archaeological sites or historic structures locat~ within the subject parcel. However, this is not
considered definitive because the project area has never been subjected to a systematic,
professional survey to locate such properties. In addition, available enviromnentaJ data for the
area support the possibility for unrecorded archaeological sites occurring in the area of potential
effect for this project. It is, therefore, the opinion of this office that there is a reasonable
probability of some proposed project actiVIties impacting historic properties.
Since potentially significant archaeological and historic sites may be present, it is our
recommendation that the project area be subjected to a systematic, professional archaeological
and historical survey. The purpose of this survey will be to locate and assess the significance of
historic properties present. The resultant survey report shall conform to the specifications set
forth in Chapter I A-46, Florida Admlnlstrallve Code, and will need to be forwarded to this office
in order to complete the process ofreviewitig the impact of this proposed project on historic
properties.
The results of the investigations will determine if significant historic properties would be
disturbed by this project. In addition, if siw.nficant remains are located, the data described in the
report and the consultant's conclusions WIll assist this office in detennining measures that must
be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse impacts to historic pr!'l'erties listed, or eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical or architectural
significance.
SOD S. Bronough Street. Tallahaaseet FL 31399..0150 . http://www.Oberitage.com
[] Director'. Office D Archaeolopt.l .Ile.urch iii fDstoric Pre.e:rvatioa 0 Hiatorteal Mueum.
(850) 245-6300 . PAX, 245-6435 (850) 245-6444 . PAX: 245.6436 (850) 245-6333 . PAX: 245-6437 (850) 245-6400 . PAX: 245-6433
CJ Palm Beach Rl!gional Offj~e 0 St. Auguattne: Restcmat Olflce a Tampa Regional Olfice
(561) 27'>-1475 . PAX, 279-1476 (904) 825-5045 . PAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 . FAX: 272-2340
I
1
}
30-
l
".
.-
Mr. Morton
November 3, 2003
Page 2
Because this letter and its contents are a matter of public record, consultants who have knowledge
of our recommendations may contact the applicant. This sliould in no way be interpreted as an
endorsement by this agency, The Registry of Professional Archaeologist (RPA) is the national
certifying organization for archaeologists. A listing of archaeologists who are RP A members
living or working in Florida can be accessed at http://dhr.dos.state.fl.uslbhp/compliance.In .
addition, the complete RP A DirectoIY of Certified Professional Archaeologists is available at
www.rpanet.org. Otherwise, upon request, we will forward our RP A list to the applicant.
If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Samantha Earnest, Historic
Sites Specialist,. at .seamesl@dos.state,il.us-er-(8s0)245-6333. Y our-inl<<cst ill protecting -
Florida's historic properties is appreciated.
. Sincerely,
~._.o_ :_Q.~, G~I~~~~O
~ _ Janet Snyder Matthews, Ph.D., Director, and'
~ State Historic Preservation Officer
Xc: Mr. Jolm English
I
""-..
30-4
rac
Attachment 30-2
~..<~~
,,,,,cc(..."~'~
~~'C" .~T !
f( ,~- ....,~;t~ ~~
~;"" ";"' ';if'<','-'~
~."..-..,..
. - --"
.. I
" .~,
m~cgr~TIwJi~ C
FEe 0 92004 ,11J'
~.:~,. ,"!lii'"
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Ms. Marion Almy
Archa,ological Consultants, Inc.
8110 FIaikie Court, Suite A
Saraso-a, Florida 34240
February 4,2004
Re: DHR No. 2004-757 I Date Received by DHR: January 29, 2004
Cultural Resource Predictive lV1odel: Ave Maria University, Collier County, Florida
Dear l\!.s. Almy:
Our ofjice received and reviewed the referenced report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373,
Florida Statutes, Florida's Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations,
regarding possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National
Reg!ste" ofHistonc Places, or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological value. The
State Historic Preservation Ofticcr is to advise and assist stale and federal agencies when
identifying historic properties, assessing effects upon thenl, and considering alternatives to avoid
or minimize adverse effects,
Our office concurs with the recommended field methodologies developed with this predictive
model. We look forward to receiving the final report detailing the results of Phase I
investigations.
If you h lYe any questions conceming our comments, please contact Samantha Eamcst, Histonc
Sites Specialist, at seamest@ctos,state.f1.us or (850) 245-6333. Your interest in protecting
Flolida'" historic properties is appreciated.
Sincerely,
JI.c,'U<.c<--
(l.~/~
tr
Frederick Gaske, Acting Director, and
Deputy ~;tate Historic Preservation Officer
5l)O S. Bronough Street . Tallahas~ee, FL 32399-0250 . http://www.nheritag~.com
~ Director's :)ffice 0 Archa~ologi.c"lll.escarch e:l Historic Preservation 0 lIislodci11 Museums
(~50) 245-o)I,){)' F'\X: 245-6435 (850) 24S-6<l44' FAX: 245-6436 (15O)24~..FA~:245-6437 (850) 245-6400' FAX: 2.'15-6433
C) l'qhn BCiH:h Regional Office- 0 St. AugusliM aal1l1lr111ll Office 0 Tamf'a Regional Office
(561) 279-1475' FAX: 279-1476 (904) 825-5045' PAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 . FAX; 272+2340
30-5
~-'. ..----. -
Attachment 30-3
rac
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Glenda E. Hood
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
_'_"';;'~_."",,.~_i..C""ioi''''''''_
Mr. David B. Genson
Barron Collier Companies
2600 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, Florida 34105
Re: DHR Project File No. 2004-2721 (2004-757) / Received by DHR: March 26, 2004
Cultural Resource Assessment Survey: Ave Maria Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA)
Property, Collier County, Florida.
April 21, 2004
DeIltMf:tlenson:
Our office received and reviewed the referenced report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373 of the
Florida Statutes for assessment of possible adverse impact to historic properties listed or eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical , architectural or
archaeological value.
Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted an archaeological and historical investigation of the
central 960 acres of the Ave Maria Property on behalf of Barron Collier Companies, in accordance with
the Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) previously submitted by ACI and approved by this office
(DHR Project File No. 2004-757). Ground surface reconnaissance and subsurface investigation of areas
exhibiting potential for the location of historic properties resulted in the identification of no
archaeological sites or historic structures within the PDA project area.
It is the opinion of ACI that development of the PDA portion of the Ave Maria property will have no
effect on historical properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. ACI
recommends no further investigation of this area. Based on the information provided, our office concurs
with these determinations and finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance with
Chapter IA-46, Florida Administrative Code.
These recommendations pertain only to the PDA portion of the Ave Maria parcel. We look forward to
r~jving future addendums to this report detailing the results of Phase I investigations of the
Development of Regional Impact (DRl) and remaining portions of the project area.
If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Ariana Slemmens, Historic Sites
Specialist, by phone at (850) 245-6333, or by electronic mail at abslemrnenslaldos.state.f1.us. Your
continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties is appreciated.
Sincerely,
~~m...~ .
btSHP<f ...,..- ~& ~t#--u.
Frederick Gaske, Acting Director, and
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
r
500 S. Bronough Street . TaUahassee, FL 32399-0250 . hltp:/Iwww.fIheritage.com
LJ Director's Office
(850) 245-6300 . FAX, 245.6435
o ArchaeoIogic..I Research
(850) 245-6444 . FAX, 245-6436
Et1 Historic Preservation
(850) 245-6333 . FAX, 245-6437
l'J Historical Museums
(850) 245-6400 . FAX, 245.6433
Cl Palm Beach Regional Office
(561) 279.1475' FAX, 279-1476
('] St. Augustine Regional Office D Tampa Regional Office
(904) 825-5045' FAX' 825-5044 (813) 272-3843' FAX, 272-2340
30-6
rac
PART VI. Specific DRllnformation
QUESTION 38 - SCHOOLS
A. For the proposed development, indicate:
1. existing and proposed enrollment by phase, in Full Time Equivalents,
AMU Phase 1 (2011) student enrollment - 3,150
AMU Phase 2 (2016) student enrollment (cumulative) - 6,000
2. type of support or management (public, private or proprietary),
AMU will be privately managed.
3. all governmental revenue sources and the level of their contributions,
AMU receives no govemment grants or revenue. Some students receive financial
aid through various govemment entities. This is strictly an entitlement for the
student. AMU does not receive nor retain any of this aid.
4. schedule of facility utilization, and
Facilities planned for opening day in 2006 will be constructed to accommodate
utilization of up to 1 ,000 students. Facilities will include academic buildings, student
housing, administration buildings and sports and recreation facilities.
Facilities will be expanded through the first Phase to support up to 3,150 students,
dependent on student enrollment. Facilities will continue to expand over the final
years, as necessary to accommodate the utilization of the total projected student
enrollment of 6,000 students.
5. academic organization and programs.
AMU is a academic institution that pledges faithfulness to the teachings of the
Catholic Church and is committed to providing one of the finest classical liberal
arts curricula available. Ave Maria University exists to further teaching, research,
and learning in the abiding tradition of Catholic thought in both national and
international settings.
A President who reports to a Board of Trustees will direct the organizational
structure of Ave Maria. A campus Chancellor will report to the President.
Academic organization will include:
1) Provost (Vice President for Academic Affairs)
2) Deans over large divisions
3) Department chairs
4) University Librarian
712312004- 135536 Ver: 01!- MPERRY
~,
03186--013-000-PDRt-28423
38-1
Administrative Governance will include
rae
1) Vice President for Business and Administration
2) Vice President for Development
3) Vice President for Enrolment Management
4) Vice President or Dean for Student Life
5) Vice President for Research
Academic programs will include both undergraduate and graduate levels. AMU's
undergraduate programs include Biology, Classics and Early Christian Literature,
Economics, History, Literature, Mathematics, Philosophy, Political Science,
Theology and Pre-Theologate: Preparatory School of Theology.
The University's Graduate Division currently offers two areas of graduate study at
the master's level, one (M.T.S.) in theology in the areas of pastoral and
speculative theological studies, and the other (M.A.E.E.) in teacher education with
a specialization in exceptional education.
In addition to academics, AMU will offer a fully range of men's and women's
intercollegiate sports, including baseball, basketball, football, golf, tennis,
swimming, track and volleyball.
B. From what counties will students be drawn? Estimate by number and percentage.
Currently at the AMU Interim campus, students represent 32 states, including 8 counties in
Florida. AMU intends to recruit students from all over the United States and abroad.
C. Identify the design population of the proposed facility, and describe the
methodology and assumptions used to derive it.
Ira Fink, a recognized independent authority on University/college programming located in
Berkley, Califomia, was retained by AMU to provide consulting services to determine
student populations and programming needs. Mr. Fink has over 25 years of experience in
this field.
AMU is designed to serve 6,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The
methodologies involved to reach the student population included research, studies and
comparisons of a variety of similar universities throughout the United States. The
assumptions used for the design population included a fall 2006 enrollment estimate of
1,000 students. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase by approximately 300-
450 students per year during Phase 1, and by roughly 500-600 students per year during
Phase 2. Based on these rates of growth assumptions, the campus will reach 6,000
students in 2016.
7/23J20Q4...135a36 Verc 011. MPERRY
~
OJ786-013-000-PDRf.28423
38-2