Loading...
BCC Minutes 12/16/1980 R Naples, Florida, December 16, 1980 ';~', ;,.~., ""!Ii" .,.~ ',*11 .;.\ :"l ',,, 'r" '. LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Governing Board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in Regular Session in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex with the following members present: VICE CHAIRMAN: Clifford Wenzel C. R. "Russ" Win,er Mary-Frances Kruse David C. Brown ABSENT: John A. Pistor (Chairman) ALSO PRESENT: Harold L. Hall, Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer; Edna Brenneman, Deputy Clerk; C. William Norman, County Manager; Donald A. Pickworth, Countv Attorney; Irving Ber!on, Utilities Division Manager; Clifford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator/Engineer; Terra Virta, Community Development Ac~inistrator; Thomas Hafner, Public Works Adminis- trator; Jeffory Perry, Zoning Director; H. Eugene Willett, Administratiye Assistant to the County Manager; Grace Spaulding, Administrative Aide to the Board; and, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett, Sheriff's Department. 800K 058 PACE24.4 li~filD denotoe itom that ~i~ roquootod to bo addo~ha Agenaaat the beginning under "Approvat of It(Jonda''. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS '. ~OOK 058 pm245 AGENDA December 16, 1980 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS SPEAKING ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING HEARD. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLA- NATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER .PUBLIC PETITIONS. AT 11 :00 A.M. ANY PERSON WHO OECIOES TO APPEAL A OECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEEO A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEEO TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. INVOCATION 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL 0F MINUTES: 5. FRO~lAMATION AND PRESENTATION OF AWARDS ~. SOCIAL SERVICES 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Petition BD-80-l3-C, Phil Pearce representing Nat Biando: requesting extension of a boat dock to 16 feet located on the corner of Ehret Lane and Ruppert's Road in Old Marco Village. (CAPC & staff recommend continuance to l2-30-BO) (Community Development) B. Petition CCCl-80-l2-C, Coastal Engineering for the Deltona Corporation: requesting a variance from the Coastal Construction Control line for South Seas Condominiums on Harco Island. (Community Development) C. Recommendation to create the Auto Ranch Road Improvement District, approve the preliminary assessment roll and authorization for advertisement for bids. (Public WorkS) D. Petition R-79-ll-I, Clarence and Mildred Weeks: requesting rezoning from "I-C-3" to "I-MHSD" for a parcel of land In Section 3, T47S, R29E. (Continued from 12-2-80 Agenda) (Zoning) Agenda Page 2 December 16, 1980 8. OLD BUSINESS A. Report and'r.oommendation re, tand for North County Branoh Library. 9. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A,' COUNTY MANAGER ( 1) Status Report ann recomMendJtion on County Building Program. (R.quested to be h.ard at 10:00 a.m.) Recommendation to upgrade the heating, ventilating and air conditioning system in the County Complex. (3) Recommendation for adoption of revised "Policy for Duplicating and Distributing Agendas for Board of County Commission Meetings. e, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN~ (2) (1) Recommendation to approve additional position for Building Inspection Department Dec. 22 - Jan. 30. (2) Recommendation to adopt r'solutions to recover funds expended by the County to abate a public nuisance (weeds and vegetation) on: (al L~t 19, Block 35, naples Park, .Unit 6 (b) lot 7, Block 70, Naples Park, Unit 5. (c) Lot 18, Block 10, Naples Park. Unit 1 (d) lot 42, Block 7, Naples Park, Unit 1 (el lot 32, Block 33, Naples Park, Unit S (f) Lots 35 & 36, Block 33, Unit 6, Naples Park C. PUBLIC SAFETY D. PUBU C WORKS (1) Recommendation to approve insured Closing Service Letter for right-of-way closings by Gulf Title Insurance Agency. Incorporated. (2) Recommendation for the termination of agreement with Vines & Associates, Inc. for professional servtce~ for the Golden Gatc Estates Rcdevelopment Program. (3) Recommendation to approve continued use of lmmokalee Landfill by Flofida Department of Corrections pending completion of new incinerator It Hendry Correctional hstitutton, 8001 058 tAcc246 '-II ~ iiiI Agenda Page 3 December ... 16, 1980 BOO~ 058 PACE 247 E. PURCHASING (1) Recommendation to award Bid 1463, Replacement of Air Handling Units for Building "A". lD. DATA PROCESSING MANAGER'S REPORT 11. UTILITJE< MANAGER'S REPORT 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13.' CLERK TO THE BOARD'S REPORT A. Payment of bills B. Budget amendments C. Other 14. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 15. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 16, NEW BUSINESS 17. PUBLIC PETITIONS 18. ADJOURN y)~~~~ ......""'I. -:~ :':'1I;.f;. ~-. , ,~':'::->;r~', , ~'. :.' ~:~):~~6.\I:: ,,,.,'!';;',t"~' ),t~:i :~"r~~~:. ;1{~' CJ r::;:.::;) ::::J December 16, 1980 AGENDA - APPROVED WITII ADDITIONS/DELETION Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with commissioner Piator not present, that the agenda be approved with the following additions/deletion: 1. Discussion re The Glades Sewer Plsnt expansion - Added to Utilities Manager's Report. 2. Purchase of Water plant site - Added to Utilities Manager's Report. 3. Status report regarding Building Program - Added to County Manager's Report (to be heard at 10:00 A.M.1 4. Report and recommendation for land for the North County Branch Library - Added under "Old Business". 5. nesolution to recover funds expended to abate a public nuisance on Lot 7, Block 70, Naples Park, Unit 5 - Deleted from Community Development ~eport. 6. Minutes of November 5, 1980 - Auded to "Approval of Minutes". 7. Resolution reappointing Former Mayor Heineman to Health Facilities Authority - Added to County Attorney's Report. MINUTES OF MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 1980 (PUBLIC HEARING RE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR FY 80-81) - APPROVED Commissioner Drown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pister not present, that the minutes ,of the Special Meeting of November 5, 1980 (Public Hearing re Tentative Budget for FY 80-81) he approved as presented. PETITION BD-80-l3C, PllIL PEARCE REPRESENTING NAT BlANDO, REQUESTING EXTEN~ION OF A BOAT DOCK TO 16 FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN OLD MARCO VIL~ - CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 30, 1980 Legal notice having been published in the Marco Island Eagle on November 27, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filad with the Clerk, public hearing was opened with regard to Petition BO-80-l3C, filed by Phil Pearce, representing Nat Biando, requesting an extension of a Boat Dock to 16 fcct on property located on Lot 2, Block 5, Old Marco Village. DOOK 058 rACE 2~8 k-./ ~ '-,.....,J ~OOK 058 PACE249 ' December 16, Igao Community Development Ad~inistrator Terry Virta advised that' the Coastal Area PI~nning Commission has been unable to come up with a decision on a recommendation and, therefore, recommended that the Board continue the hearing to December 30, 19BO. Corr~issioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the staff recommendation be approved and the hearing continued. PETITION CCCL-80-12C, COASTAL ENGINEERING FOR THE DELTONA CORPORATION, REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM CCCL FOR SOUTH SEAS CONDOMINIUM, MARCO ISLAND _ REFERRED 8ACK TO STAFF FOR FURTHER REVIEW WITH PETITIONER legal notice having been published in the Marco Island Eagle on Novemt~r 17, 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition CCCL-80-12C, filed by Coastal Engineering for The Deltona Corporation, requesting a variance from the Coastal Construction Control line with regard to property located on Tract E, Marco Beach Unit 22 (South Seas Condominium), Community Development ^dministrator Virta said that the request is to create a sy,tem of artificial dunes and to place riprap revetment, dune walkovers and vegetative planting seaward of the established CCCl. Mr. Virta reported that, since the oriyinal staff re onT?ndation for denial was mad" he has had several llleetings with Environmental Consultant Dr. Jay f1armic with regard to the proposal. Mr. Virta read from a memorandum dated December 10, 1980 prepared by Dr. Harmic, which sets forth pertinent information concerning various positive facets of the proposal; however, the conclusion reached was that the buried revetment cannot be recommended. He said that is his concern as well and the recommendation is for denial based on that part of the proposal, Hr. Robert Motchkavitz, representing The Ocltona Corporation, stated that the project will serve five purposes; I) protect the South Seas Condominium in case of moderate or severe storm; 2) provide a trap for windblown sand; 3) pro- ~te beach acretion; 4) sloping revetment will provide a limit under severe storms where the beach can erode to; and, 5) will provide an aesthetically pleasing transition from beach and recreational activities to the high development Icti- yitles, Hr. Hotchkavitz detailed what efforts have been made in the past with 1 C.J C....:J ==:J December 16, 1980 their program of beach nourishment on the site. He said extensive contact has been carried on with the regulatory agencies with expertise in such matters, primarily with the State DNR, commenting that in October a formal application for this work was submitted to the oureau of Beaches and Shores. The appli- cation is pending, continued the speaker; however, .it has been learned from the technical staff that the agency is prepared to recommend the project and only awaiting County approval before it goes to the State. Cabinet for permitting approva 1. Mr. Michael F. Stephen, Vice President of Coastal Engineering Consultants. informed the Board that extensive work has been done on Marco Island and the subject plan was developed for vitalization and restoration of the South S"as area property. Mr. Step~en provided the Board with a blueprint, designated as Exhibit 2, showing the erosion trends at South Seas Beach, Marco Island, and an engineering rendering showing the placement of the proposed dune field and revetment. These exhibits were discussed with Mr. Stephen pointing out the advancages, in his viewpoint, that the plan will provide with regard to pro- tecting the beach from erosion, and the like, When asked to comment, Or. Harmic said that his aforementioned memo details his opinion on the plan, unless there are additional questions forth- coming. Mr. Bernie Yokel, representing the Collier County Conservancy, observed that the position of the Conservancy is very parallel with that of the Planning . Department and also the position Dr, Harmic has taken, adding the comment that the advantages outlined by the staff are largely correct. He said his intent was to "paint a more graphic picture" of wha,t uncovered revetment might lead to, pointlng out that the continued tendency to tamper with the beach process, and introduce foreign materials, will ultimately become a problem. Mr. Yokel commented on the beach erosion which has already taken place along the beach- front at Marco Island and, to illustrate his conCerns for the protection of the beach. he referred to an article, with photographs, published recently in Outdoor America, an Izaak Walton league publication, which illustrates the remains of four generations of shoreline structures - the timbers, rocks and debris which MOl 058 rAcc250 600~ 058 PAGE251 December 16, 1980 were used to stabilize a receding shoreline, He said by the time the ocean overcomes the ~evetment rocks the beach becomes impassable like the beach in front of the Sunset Hduse Condominium. He said that it is his opinion that Dr. Hannic's recommendation that the revetment not be approved is the best possible to manage the resources. With regard to the sand dune, Mr. Yokel said that such proposal is an improvement: however, he would construct it behind the CCCL, commenting that the beach is narrow and growing more so and that the beach must have room to react - draw sand and re-deposit sand. There was a brief discussion concerning the placement of seawalls, either vertical or riprap, and the benefits or adverse effects involved, with Mr. Yokel stating that placing a seawall on the other side of the CCCL, due to the considerable setback involved, there would be a longnr time period involved before the beach would be eroded. Dr. Harmic explained further the reference to the construction of headlands, as rtferenced in his previously-mentioned memo, stating that there has been some experimental work donn on the suWect with regard to their placement in water to reduce the velocity of the waves, and the like. He said that where they are placed on Sanibel would indicate that they probably do serve a positive function; however. he said that the~ha,e not been looked at to make a judgment. Since the headlands were not included as part of the petition, said Or. Harmic, it was felt that to spend a lot of time checking on them would not be justified. Dr. Hannie also said that the petitioner has refused to continue the hearing when requested to do so in order to allow the staff additional time. When asked by Vice Chairman Wenzel if this is the reason for the recommendation for denial. Dr. Harnic responded in the affirmative by stating that the petitioner, obviously, does not wish to continue the hearing and has not decided to alter it nor to remove the revetment from the petition. Commissioner Kruse suggested that, since coastal IIl4nagement is such a precise science and still in the experimental stages, that it would be better to continue the petition in order to get a better "feel. for the combination of off-shore structures plus the particular type of revetment being proposed. Dr. Hannie said that was the staff's recommendation to the peti- titioner's agent and the petitioner saw fit not to concur. December 16, 1980 Mr. Stephen observed that several good points have been made and agreed that some sort of beach management program is essential, adding the comment that a County-wide management program is one of his goals. However, he said that there is no clear-cut program in Collier County, nor definitive guide- lines and real technical expertise to work toward,a conclusion of a problem of the sort under discussion. Furthermore. said Mr. Stephen, reliance has been heavily placed on the DNR for their input into the design projects and that at the present ~ime the headland proposal is being reviewed by them. He said that an application has not been m^de in the County for the headlands permit and, therefore, it was felt there was no necessity to ask for a continuance to evaluate something that ;.as not been appl ied for. Mr. Stephen elaborated in detail on the various aspects of the proposed plan for the beach area outlining the reasons why the proposed ,'evetment is critical, and explaining that the position and placement of the dunes has been worked out carefully, It is believed, said Mr. Stephen, that the entire proposal is based on sound management guidelines which have been applied and used else- where in coastal projects over the last ten years. In response to Commissioner Kruse' question regarding the Corps' juris- diction, Mr. Motchkavitz explained that the location of the activity to take place is already permitted by the Corrs and the DER under E ,isting permits for the Collier Bay area, He said that there are certain I<ater quality standards which have to be met and which will be met. The project has been reviewed with both agencies and received favorable responses; however, they have each acknow- ledged that they have no jurisdiction other than water quality review. Commissioner Wimer stated that he has a problem with using riprap or boulders and questioned why the dunes can't be built out of sand. Mr. Stephen explained that this might be an alternative for consideration if the area was totally natural and unaffected by existing structures. However, he said that Marco Island has been affected over the past few years by the negative effect of seawalls and said that part of the erosion condition that exists is the result of existing wave reflection and that it would be a total waste of money and totally useless because the dune would be obliterated because of these unnatural wave forces. He explained in great detail why this is so, including the various MOl 058 rACE 252 aOOK 058 PACf 253 December 16, 1980 alternatives which had to be evaluated, He said that there is some need for upland property stabilization because the land behind the ~etback line has been developed into swimming pools, roads, buildings, and the like, which need to be protected in the event of a major storm from the iu>> c: ~lJPportive sediment. the sand. It was pointed out by Commissioner Wimer that boulders ~re not a natural part of the beach and that they do increase erosion. He said that the best thing to do with the beach is to leave it alone, the next best thing being, If there is a need to do something, is to do it with the same material which Is there - that being sand. County Attorney Pickworth raised a point which has not as yet been dis- cussed which he said is that the County has an ordinance which states that nothing will be built seaward of the CCCl. There is a variance provision, said the Attorney, in one, and only one, situation, reading from the pertinent ordinance as follows; If in the inrnedlate contiguous or adjacent area, a number of existing structures have established a reasonably continuous and uniform construction line closer to the line of mean high water than the line herein establi~hed, and that said existing structures have not been unduly affected by erosion, a pro- posed structure may be permitted on such line If such proposed structure is also approved by the Board of County Commissioners, Attorney Pickworth said that when the subject ordinance was written the type of argument being heard this date was considered and rejected because it was known at the time there are two ways of handling construction seaward of the CCCl; 1) on a case-by-case basis, evaluating an engineering proposal and miklng a determination as to whether the criteria has been met or not; and, 2) to establish a definite line and then establish one or more criteria for when a variance from that line can be approved, the latter being the position chostn by the County and has been the law for almost five years. lIe said that it has never been the law that a petitioner could get a variance from the line because it is stated that a plan presented will not cause erosion. He further stated that if a syst~ Is established for granting such variances based on the engineering ~rits of a proposal. there Is a need to change the law to ..ke It confol'll with that type of standard. He pointed out that there 11 nothing in the Staff Report or the Materiel furnished which Indicates any opinion on that particular point has been expressed by the Plennlng Staff at all, ".'. ~,..~!.t '~ <;0,;,1 ",,. >",1' ':I"':~~: I;~ " ',. ")'" . \;~ . '/\I'..,'\-. December 16, 1900 Hr. Motchkavitz Informed the Board that there Is an established wall south of the subject property which would be an extension of the line, as referred to by ^ttorney Pickworth, It ls his bellef, said Mr, Hotchkavitz, that the propo~al adheres to the County requirement~, Furthermore, said Mr. Motchkavitz, they have taken every opportunity to meet with the staff and hava not taken lightly their proposal to delay action on the petition, He explained the problems which would be encountered in the ,vent action is delayed. Vice Chairman Wenzel Inquired of the petitioner if they desire to have the petition continued in order to meet with the staff to, more or less, justify the ne~j for a variance or the reasons for a variance or if It is their desire to have action taken this date. Mr. Motchkavitz said that they would be glad to meet with the staff if there is a sincere con~ern with regard to the proje~ t. Mr. Virta observed that southeast of the site, as the beach runs, there has been a common line e~tabllshed; however, there has also been a line associated with tho beach running to Tiger Tail Beach, Therefore. from a staff perspective, If he were called upon to state whether or not there ls a common line, he would have to say that, because there are two lines. that It Is not common. lie said that he would rather not hav~ t" make that state- ment and would rather see the petitIon continued. Attorney Pickworth e~.horated further on the intent of the drafters of the pertinent ordinance provision mentioned previously which he said was to prevent inequality in the event that a developer could be forced to erect a condo building behind those which were built earlier. The intent, said Attorney PIckworth, was to eventua lly "get everythl ng behind the line". Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer, that Petition CCCL-80-12C be referred back to the staff for further review with the petitioner. Attorney Pickworth said that when the petItion is brought back In public hearing the staff will recommend to the Board their conclusion es to whether they believe that the petition meets the standard In the ordinance end the factuel bull for that conclusion. lie said the petitioner can argue to the contra". If the conclusion reached 11 that tho standard has not bttn _t. aoo<< 058 raCE 254 ......__o,.,_.___.___'''"'''.,~_.. l....;.....,j ;.......;.J MOK 058 rm255 ;~.-...j December 16, 1980 Following that, he continued, the staff can recommend that the structure to the south has established e line that the petitioner is entitled to a variance. At that point, said the Attorney. the question would again be whether or not the project would be harmful to the beach, Upon call for the question. the motion carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present. RESOLUTION BO-279 CREATING THE AUTO RANCH ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - ADOPTED; PREllMI::ARY ASSESSMENT ROll - APPROVED; STAFF AUTHORIZEO TO AOVERTISE FOR BIDS Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on November 25, I9BO as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the creation of the Auto Ranch Road Paving Im- provement District consisting of approximately 6,112 lineal feet. Public Works Administrator Clifford Barksdale informed the Board that the 50% plus one signatures ha,e beer. obtaifled with regard to the project and that the needed right-of-way has also been obtained. He said that the total preliminary assessment roll for the aforementioned lineal feet is $203.049.70 which equates to $13.20 per front foot for all properties. those abutting v.~ rod as. well as those properties th3t do not abut the road but will still benefit from the Improvements. The assessment, said Mr. Barksdale, compares favorably with some of the previous rMd ~lstrlcts and, in scxne cases, Is lower. It Is the staff recommendation that the district be created and that the staff be authorized to proceed with advertising for bids. Ms. Har~4ret Cuppy, Auto Ranch Road resident, reported that she obta~ed the signatures of the owners who want the road and expressed satisfaction with the project as presented by Mr. Barksdale. Mr. Willis Belair questioned the method of assessment. stating that this property is assessed in two directions - along the road for one lot. and along the side road also. He also pointed out that the trailer park Is practically paying for one-half of the assessment and that the two parks at the other end are not assessed for other than their frontage. not for the roads going in nor the people using them. Mr. Barksdale explained. by referring to a map displayed, the manner In which all of thP properties under discussion were assessed, .sug- gestlng that there MaY be a misunderstanding. He said he would ch4ck Into the litter ;~rther, comltnting that It was not the intent to assess both weys on tilt comer property, Deeember 16: 1980 Hr, Don Drher, resident on Auto Ranch Road, supported the road improve- ~nt project but voiced concern over the drainage problem now existing, Hr. Barksdale said that he is aware of the problem and that correcting d~ainage comprises up to 501 of the costs involved in road improvements which is a factor considered In order to make sure that the road Is protected, Vice Chairman Wenzel suggested that the speaker meet with the Engineer to discuss his Individual assessment. The following persons, although registered to speak on the matter, waived their opportunity to be heard. I. Charles Platt 2. Henry Mashlan 3. Bernard R, Handley 4. Henry lier S. Tonnie Beck 6. Peter M. Rebro Hr. Jim Cuppy, Auto Ranch Road resident, noted his support for the road improvements, including the correction of the drainage problems. He mentioned that many of the individuals are concerned over the timeframe involved in paying for the a'Hssment and said that a further concern of his, personally, was the heavy truck traffic which might damage the road, He said that he would like to see a load limit imposed, Mr. Barksdale addressed the concerns by stating that he would recOnTT'end a minimum of five years for the payment of the assessment and, with regard to the truck traffic, he said th~t there will be a "dead end" sign at the outlet of the road and, If there is sufficient need demonstrated, a load limit sign can be Installed. Mr, Ted Reynolds, affected propp.rty owner, said that he would not like to see a load limit placed on the road, pointing out that he is a licensed scrap dealer, carrying normal loads of junk. not overloaded. He said that he would like to have the drainage engineered and renovated and a good road developed. Mr. Reynolds also requested that. if at all possible, a longer period than five years be provided for the payment of the assessment at an interest rate that the property owners can live with, It was Vice Chairman Wenzel's response that these Irrangements wIll be up to the people in attendance It the flnll public hearing. teOK 058 rAC[ 256 ".----. ~OOK 058 pmZ57 December 16, 1900 Hr. Barksdale said that an inquiry has been received from a resident. on one of the side roads Involved as to whether or not these side road ditches and drainage will be included I" the improvements, He said that the answer given to the individual was negative since it would not be fair to improve his road and i"clude that in the cost for everyone else to share; however, he said that there will be some improvement involved due to the necessity to match grades. Hr. Styro". Oak Street resident, objeeted to paying for a road which he can"ot get to with Mr. 8arksdale explaining that those residents living down the side roads were not included in the total cost of the project - the petition only requested the paving of Auto Ranch Road. Vice Chairman Wenzel offered the suggestion that if the speaker and the other persons involved were desirous of havi"g their roads improved they ~hould submit a petition to the Engineering Department. Hr. Uelen Boronl ~t~ted her opposit Ion to the paving of Auto Ranch Road since her property face~ US ~I and she has no need for the road under discussion. Hr. Barksdale explained that there will he ~nme benefit derived since the property has some frontage on Auto Ranch Road. Submitted for the record were the following letters in opposition: I. Eldridge Styron - 12/1~/BO 2. Maybell Anderson. Received 12/10/60 3. Mrs. Ellen Butler - 12/15/80 All proponents and opponents h~vlng been ~eard. Commi~sioner Drown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried ~/O with Commissioner Plstor not present, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded.by Commissioner Kru~e and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Plstor not prese"t. that Resolution BO-279. creating the Auto Ranch Road Improvement District, be adopted; that the Preliml"ary Assess- ~nt Roll be approved; and that the staff be authorized to advertise for bids with regard to the project. . . . . . . _._----"'_._."'.~., December 16, 1980 tRecess 10:35 A. M. until 10:45 A.M. AGREEMENT WITH CORAL RIDGE-COLLIER PROPERTIES rOR ACQUISITION or CERTAIN PELICAN BAY PROPERTY rOR COLLIER NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY - APPROVEO F.OR CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE; ARCHITECT AUTHORIZED TO pnOCEEO WITH FINAL DESlr.'1 County Library Director Richard Joder said that the agreement being pre- sented Is for Board authority to acquire from Coral Ridge-Collier Properties, Inc. e piece of County-owned land at the north end of the Pelican Bay pu~ abutting on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, containing I.S~ acres, upon which to erect the Coll~er North Branch Library, County Manager Norman pointed out that the subject contract does not, In itself, give the County clear title to the property but sufficient assurance that the property will be received, When requested to comment, County Attorney Pickworth said that there is no problem executing the agreement as long as there are no expenditures made on the land itself. He said that it is his understanding that the signed deed will be provided sometime between February and April df 1981. Commissioner 8rnwn moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse, that the BCC enter into the subject agreement to acquIre from Coral Ridge-Collier Properties the parcel of land described thp.reln and that the Chairman be authorized to proceed with the final design work. Mr. Norman called the Board's attentIon to a minor change made in the language of the contract, which Attorney Pickworth has .pp;oved subsequent to the copy which the Board received which, in essence, states that at some future date if the County desires to use the property for other than a library approval will have to be obtaIned from the developer. The maker of the motion agreed to include "as amended" In his motion, whore appropriate, following which the motion carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present. . . . . . t aOO4 058 racr 260 "".._--_..._~-----_._"~" - '" " tOOK 058 rACE 265 December 16, 1980 ORD1NANCE 80-113 RE PETITION R-79-11-I, CLARENCE AND MILDRED WEEKS, REOUESTING REZONING FROM "I-C-3" TO "I-MHSD" FOR PARCEL IN S3, T47S, R29E - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on qctober 31. 1980 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication previously filed with the Clerk. public hearing was continued from December 2, 1980 with regard to Petition R-79-11-1. filed by Clarence and Mildred Weeks, requesting rezoning of a pArcel of land In S3, T47S, R29E. As contained in the Executive Summary pertaining to the matter, Zoning Director Perry said that the petitioners wish to have the property rezoned from Commercial Industrial to Mobile Home Subdlvi<lon, The petition is being reheard due to the Board's concern that there would be no buffering between the proposed use and the adjoining industrial zoning, An amnndment to the Zoning Ordinance, requiring appropriate buffer zones, has since been adopted and, therefore, the petition is being re-addres~ed. There being no persons to speak on the matter, Commissioner Brown moved, ~conded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the public hearing be closed, Comml~sloner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Plstor not present, that the ordinance as numbered arid entitled below, be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book 12. The petitioner, Clarence Weeks, expressed his appreciation to the Board for what he believes was a just decision and for the job the Board is doinQ which, he said. is not always appreciated. "a 't~ "\~ t \f{ 'J ',." it it it i"~; ;:;' ~','~' <~~,; ,~: ':~f;Ji , ~<$\t, ,,~ ,~i '..;\:~.'~; ~, it .. .. '800~ 058 r~~E267 December 16, 19BO BOARO APPROVES RETENTION OF POLIZZI/flEERV, A JOINT VENTURE FOR CONSTRUCTION, TO PERFORM CDNSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR TIlE COUNTY BUILDING PROGRAM, AND STAFF DIRECTED TO NEGOTIATE FINAL CONTRACT RE SAME County Manager Norman explained that the proposal before the Board is to begin the Implementation of the County Office Building and Jail Expansion Pro- gram a. contained In the A, T. Kearney Report recommendation wherein the present and future facilities needs of the County have been tentatively identified In the Capital Improvement Plan and the FY 80-81 Budget, As contained In the Executive Su~ry dated December 5, 1980, the needs are summarized, as follows: I. A new 30,000 square foot County Jail, 2, A new 33,750 square foot Criminal Justice Tower Building to house the following agencies: A. Clerk of the Courts B. Court Reporter C, Judicial System D. Pub li c Defender r. Sheri ff F. States Attorney 3. Renovation of the sp,lce vacated by the above agencies to provide the necessal~ space identified by A. T. Kearney for the balance of County operations, Administrative Assistant to the County Manager 11. G. Willett touched briefly on the Report entitled "County Building Program" suhmitted along w1t.h the Execu- tive Report which outlilles the efforts made to date and a detailed recommendation for implementation of the Program. Commissioner Wimer, commenting that a very thorough report has been offered for Board review, moved for adoption of the recommendation; i. e. that the firm of Polizzi/Heery, A, Joint Venture for Construction, be retained by the County to perform construction management services for the County Building Pro- gram as identIfied and funded in the CapHal Improvement Program, and that the staff be directed to negotiate a final contract with the firm for approval by the County CommIssion. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown. Mr. Hike Zewalk, of the North Naples Civic Association, suggested that the public would like to be aware of the costs of the Program, and the like with Mr. Norman responding that these decisions have not been made as yet, Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0 with Commissioner Plstor not present, '\ .,(;. ,~ La., .y,: " i:~ " December 16, 1980 BCC APPROVES RECOMMENDATION TO UPGRADE HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDI- TIONING SYSTEM IN THE COUNTY COMPLEX - PHASE I, PURSUANT TO RECOMMENDATION' ~XECUTIVE SUMMARY 12/5/BO Administrative A,slstant to the County Manager H. G. Willett explained briefly the Technical Assistance Program (TAP) Study recently undertaken and the subsequent report entitled "County HVAC System" which outlines In deta1l the present condition of the heating, ventilation, and air condlt1on1ng system In the County Complex, as submitted with the Executive Summary on the tnatter dited December S, 1980. Basically, said Mr. Willett, the recOllllllnda- tlon Is that the system be replaced or renovated over a period of time 1n two phases I I.e. Phase I . as soon as pOSSible - Installation of the computer control system, and replacement of the HVAC sJstem in Buildings "C" and "0"1 and, Phase II _ Implement the balance of the program In conjunction with the County Buildln9 Proqram. Respond1ng to Vice Chairman Wenzel, Mr, Willett said that the work would be performed by qualified people, the firm who made the TAP Study. Commissioner Wimer oh~erved that the staff has been working long and hard on the proposed project, and moved for the adoption of the staff recommendation, IS follows: "} ( > , ~ ~ "d 1. Final paym<'nt in the ,,,nount of SI ,562.50 be authorized to Jones/AAC as compensation for the1r TAP Report, 2, That the Commission adopt the plan for HVAC improvement as detailed In the TAP Report. 3. Authoriz^tlon to proceed with Phase I of the project, as outlined, , 4, Authorization to allow staff to enter into competitive negotiations to obtain the services of a qualified engineer to design the Phase I system in accordance with the Florida Competitive Negotiations Act and the Report. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Urown, Fiscal Officer Hall commented that there Is a possibility that additional funds, over and above the cost figure set forth In the Executive Summary NY be Involved due to the problems encountered in controlling electricity and lighting In the Naplos area. However, said foIr, Hall. it will be a rflSonable alllOunt - probably U,ooo or so, . ,eoo~ 058 rACE 269 December 16, 1980 Vice Chairman Wenzel voiced his con corn over spending approximately. $500,000 for a projected savings of only $54,000, It was pointed out that the estimated cost in Phase I is approximately $101,000 with a calculated savings of $26,058 per year, It was added by Mr. Norman that Phase II could change substantially before Implementation - that Phase I only is being recom- ,.nded at this time. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present. REVISED POLICY FOR DUPLlCATIIIG AND DISTRIBUTING AGENDAS FOR IlCC ~IEETlNGS - APPROVED, PURSUAllT TO RECOfotlENOAT ION.." WlTW~rr) 111 PECIITlYE, 51-po.y I'nC:O.1UIl/AI) County Manager Norman explained and rev'~wed the highlights of the Executive Summary dated 1218/80 setting forth a new, more comprehensive and detailed pollCy covering OCC agenda duplication and distribution, He said that the number of requests and the volume of copying and distribution work has reached the point where he cannot effectively adminIster the previous policy which the aoard adopted on February 24, 1977. The proposed polley, a copy of which was attached to the subject Summary, is designed to cover the three types of agenda packages, the three methods of distribution which are used, and the five types of individuals or organizations which are currently being serviced, continued Mr, Horman. Hr. Norman stated that the proposed polley accomplishes two worthwhile objectives, as follows: 1. It places the burden for making needed arrangements for agenda . distribution on the applicant, Including picking-up, and providing envelopes and postage where appropriate. 2. ^ more clear distinction is made between who received "free" copies and who Is required to pay for same: and those who must pay must ~ke acceptable arrangements. Further, said Hr, Norman, the proposed policy, and notification of how It will affect each of the 93 parties now receiving one of the three types of packages, was sent out on Hov~er 20, 1980, Responses have been received, hi said, from 24 of the non-County parties and no negative responses have betn rtelived frea either County or non-County sources. }',' ,::~~ I 1t :'i~ :;;.;~ '~, :)f; \,~ ., ,-,f Deccmber 16, 1980 Hr, f1ike Zewalk ob~crved that he is the "newspaper of the north" and emphasized his need to be fully aware of all matters to report back to the North Naples Civic Association. Mr. Norman said that the proposed policy calls for him to receive all Executive Summaries without charge in addition to the agenda. He said that if it does not answer.all of his questions he can contact his office for additional backup material. Mr. William Shearston, representing the Contractors Assocation of Collier County, suggested that it must cost a "bundle" to print the material which he said he does not think is fair to the taxpayers. However, he suggested that no one should have to pay for a copy if the press receives it free. Vice Chairman Wenzel commented that all taxpayers support the 80ard and that tho material should be given free to all or the recipients should all be charged, noting that providing it free is costing $12,000 per year. Mr. Charlie Andrews agreed that either everyone or no one should pay for the agenda and/or material. He said he would like to have a copy of the Execu- tive Summaries together with an agenda, asking that he be given that con- sideration even though he does not represent a civic association but does represent about B6 condominium owners. Vicc Chairman Wenzel observed that Mr. Andrews' problem will be solved if the proposed policy is adopted. Commissioner Wimer mo;ed for the adoption of the staff recommendation as contained in the Executive Summary dated December B, 1980 pertaining to a revised policy for duplicating and distributing agendas for the BCC meetings. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present. ADDITIONAL POSITION WITHIN BUILDING DEPT. ON INTERIM BASIS - APPROVED UNTIL 1/31/81; APPROPRIATE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO BE PREPARED Pursuant to brief explanation by Community Development Administrator Virta, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the Board authorize an additional pOSition in., the Building Dept. in order to provide needed assistance on an interim basis, such authorization to expire on .1/31/81; and, that the Fiscal Officer be directed to prepare the necessary budget amendment, as recommended in the Executive Suaalry dated Dec. 8. 1980. ~oo~ 058 rACE 270 ~ ~ ;;;;; BOOK 058 rACEZ71 [ii:'.l "".'":'- ,~"'. December 16, 19BO RESOLUTION 80-280, 80-281, 80-282, 80-283. 80-284 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR COST OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NlII5ANr.F - AMPT~n . Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brpwn and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Resolution 80-280 providing for assessment of a lien for the cost of the abatement of a public nuisance on Lot 19. Block 35, Unit 6, Naples Park, owned by Will{am Scherer, be adopted; that Resolution 80-281 providing for the assessment of a lien for the cost of the abatement of a public nuisance on Lot 18, Block 10, Unit 1, Naples Park, owned by Walter L. Smith, be adopted; that Resolution 80-282 providing fer the assessment of a lien for the cost of the abatement of a public nuisance on Lot 42, Block 7, Unit 1. Naples Park, owned by Frank Dembowski, be adopted; that Resolution 80-283 providing for the assessment of a lien for the cost of the abatement of a public nuisance on Lot 32, Block 33, Unit 6, Naples Park, owned by Marvin Landman, be adopted; and. that Resolution 80-284 providing for assessment of a lien for the cost of the abatement of a public nuisance on Lots 35 and 36, Block 33, Unit 6, Naples Park, owned by Jllona Rumy, be adopted, < Sf~ ~ ;(' , i >j'-.> '. ':"' ".\~~ '~ .i~\. ;1 . "Y~ 'oj ';~ * ': * * * ." :! "' l " . ~ * . :.~ . 'i:~ :1\, '.....k ~~:,-~~..,t ' t'.>, r>~'J iIU;.:;.;.;-,' ~ ~ aoo~,D58 PAGEZ71 December 16, 1980 " " -. INSURED CLOSING SERVICE LETTER FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY CLOSINGS BY GULF TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC, - APPROVED . Pursuant to brief explanation by Public Works Administrator Barksdale, as contained in the Executive Summary dated Dec, 4, 1980, Commissione~ Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Plstor not present, that the revised Insured Closing Service Letter for Right-of-Way Closings by Gulf Title Insurance Agency, Inc. be approved. * * * * ",I. ~~J " ".'!j ';';'l:'1 ,:t;-" "- ,.',~ , \p \J)':' " -... -'"' .--'" BOOK. 058 PAcE28f December 16, 1980 " BOARD APPROVES TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITH VINES & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR. SERVICES RE GOLOEN GATE ESTATES REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Pursuant to staff recommendation set forth in the Executive Summary dated Dec. 5, 1980, Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the recommendation for the termi- nation of the Agreement with Vines & Associates, Inc, for professional services for the Golden Gate Estates Redevelopment Program, effective Dec, 5, 1980, be approved. REQUEST 8Y FLORIDA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS FOR CONTINUATION OF USE OF IMMOKALEE LANDFILL - GRANTED Public Works Administrator Barksdale noted the receipt of a letter dated Dec. I, 1980 from the Florida Dept. of Corrections requesting permission to c~ntinue usin9 the landfill facility located in Immokalee until their incinerator can be built. Mr. 8arksdale stated that it is his recommendation that the request be approved. Comm1sioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer, that the request be granted. Mr. Robert V. Greene, Hendry Correctional Institution, was present to explain that it is expected that their incinerator will be constructed within three months. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present. BID #463 FOR REPLACE~IENT OF AIR HANDLING UNITS FOR BUILDING "A" - AWARDED TO CONDITIONED AIR, NAPLES, IN THE SUM NOT TO EXCEED $11,908. As recommended in the Executive Summary dated Dec. 4, 1980, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Bid '463, for the replacement of the air handling units for Building "A", be awarded to Conditioned Air, Naples, Florida. in the sum not to exceed $11,908. and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the resultin9 Agreement. .,"' , '.i <1".,.1 '" ': ~ ~~'r.f, ,,:',)~i~ ;'.";i~K~ .^~ :.:!tf .','i"t*J './~f'!Jt ,-, ~.,,'. :/i ., :". '.~ . J~' -~~~'::' ._~- ,.l';;;fJ~~ .;~...:. :"'''$ ,-:~~il subject, who were in attendance at the previou;ly-scheduled meeting, be notified,... ;"'. "', "'It , ~ ' ., ';1' , # ~ with Mr. Berzon stating that, once it is placed on the agenda, it will be'publictzed. ... . ~ "-'l:'~ . Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with ~. , ,~. December 16, 1980 REQUEST BY TilE GLADES FOR EXEMPTION OF SEWER PLANT FROM REGIONAL SEWER SYSTEM - TO BE SCHEDULED ON AGENDA FOR JAN. 6, 19B1 Utilities Divisio~ Director Berzon recalled that the request by The Glades for the exemption of their Sewer Plant from the Regional Sewer System was deleted from the agenda of Dec. g, 19BO, at the request of the attorney for The Glades. Subsequently, said Mr. Berzon, there has been a request for the matter to be brought' up again. He said that there has been much interest expressed on the subject throughout the area and pointed out that the request is a serious matter, Mr. Harry Hubschman, representing The Glades, requested that the matter be continued until Jan. 6, 1981 since there has been some confusion and, also, due to the fact that his attorney is not present. Mr. Hubschman said that their Sewer Plant is near completion and that there has been a problem with the taxes as well as conflicting with the Co"nty's sewer project which needs to be addressed at a later date. , .'.', ", .. ..of;:," --: .I ....\." to speak on the" . ,. , '. " I '. ',. Vice Chairman Wenzel directed that those persons who wanted by The Glades to be heard with . ..'.,;!)" regard to Th. Glades' Sewe'. Plant be scheduled on the agenda for Jan; 6, 1981. Commissioner Pistor not present, that the request ....... STATUS REPORT RE PURCHASE OF WATER PLANT SITE - NO ACTION REQUIRED Utilities Division Director Berzon said that, at his request, the matter of the purchase of a site for the Water Treatment Plant was added to the agenda since, in his opinion, it is important for the Board to be aware of a situation "which is going on", He recalled that o.n Nov. 11, 1980 the Board authorized the consulting engineers and the County staff to proceed with the use and t~e eventual purchase of a particular parcel of land for the subject plant, He said that on that date the owners were here and spoke before the Board, made their views known, and, at that time, they asked for $16,50D per acre for the property. The recommendation, he said, was to go nO more than the appraised value and, at their request, a meeting was held with the owners and various staff members. and on November 25, 19BO In offer was made to sell the land at $14,500 per acre. &O~ 058 rAcr282 " r1' .. BOOK 058 rACf283 December 16, 19BO Hr, Berzon pointed out that the property is not the same parcel authorized but a parcel to the south. The owners were advised that the County would apprise them of the County's position as soon as an additional appraisal was obtained which Mr. Berzon said is being arranged. Commissioner Wimer commented that he was under the impression that there wasn't sufficient time for further appraisals with Mr. Berzon agreeing that time is important, pointing out that approximately $12,000 have already been incurred in engineering costs with the possibility. if it is "cut off", the cost will probably approach $20,000 and could cause at least a 6 to 8-week delay. Vice Chairman Wenzel voiced his concern over the expenditure when it was not known whether the County will own the land with Mr. Serzon pointing ou~ that the expenditure was authorized on the basis of condemnation proceedings toward the acquisition of the particular parcel of land and that there have been surveying and design work involved in the project so far. He said that the ex-, penditure wi 11 not "be down the dra i n" because the pa rce 1 will be obta i ned if "we 9'J ~o condemnation", -4'''':'' . , , / about . County Attorney Pickworth observed that he has always been skeptical the appraisal from the beginning which, in his opinion, has never been "in the ballpark". He said that his office has conferred with attorneys involved in condemnation of some of the sorrounding properties with a price in the neigh- borhood of $5,000 to $6,000 per acre. Therefore, continued Attorney Pickworth, there is a substantial amount of money involved and said that it is his feeling that there can be no further negotiation until another appraisal is obtained. Mr. Berzon concluded his report by stating that there have been some persons intervening of which the Soard should be apprised. He said that they are pro- ceeding as the Board directen initially and that no one has been told to do any- thing to the contrary. RESOLUTION 80-286 REAPPOINTING FORMER MAYOR HEINEMAN TO THF. r.OU,IF,ll COUNTY FACILITIES AUTHORITY - ADOPTED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Resolution 80-286, reappointing Fonner Hayor Harry E, O. Heineman to the Call ier County Health Facilfties Authority, be adopted, as prepared by County Attorney Pickworth. ~g ~:j(f, &iI ~i""":l &OOK 058 rACE 285 December 16, 1980 ROUTINE BILLS - AUTHORIZED FOR PAYMENT Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the bills, having been processed following established procedures with funds available, be approved for payment as witnessed by the following checks issued from December'10,'1980 through December 16, 1980: Check Nos. Account County Checks CETA Payroll 2988 - 3256 4890 - 5070 BUDGET AMENDMENT 81-8 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR REGISTRATION FEE FOR SEMINAR RE AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $150. - Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Budget Amendment 81-8, transferring funds to provide for registration fee for Community Cannery Supervision Seminar (Agriculture Dept.) be adopted in the amount of $150. * * * * * * , . .,z ,':. :1 il .-:; I:~ . , , .-j.< ,~ .~ -v~ ~~ "I"" ......,.,., ",'';;; . i~;~ '>;'tj, ,....... ~ t:::iiJ ~ 058 pm287 December 16, 1980 bOOK CERTIFICATES FOR CORRECTION TO TAX ROLL - APPROVED FOR CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 ' with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the following certificates for correction to the tax rolls be approved for the Chairman's signature: Qlli. ~ 1979-218 1980-1 - 1980-9 Tax Roll 1979 F & F Tax Roll 1980 Tangible Personal Property 10/2/80 12/2/80 - 12/11/80 RESIGNATION OF MRS. KATHRYN REISER FROM EAC AND GGESC - ACCEPTED; APPROPRIATE LETTER OF APPRECIATION AUTHORIZED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner 8rown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the l"esignation of Mrs. Kathryn Reiser from the Environmental Advisory Council and from the Golden Gate Estates Study Committee, as contained in her letter to the Board dated Dec. 5, 1980, be accepted; and that an appropriate letter of appreciation be prepared for the Chairman's signature. RESOLUTION 80-285 URGING SUPPORT OF THE EFFORTS OF THE ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB IN PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS OF THE EARTHQUAKE IN SOUTHERN ITALY - ADOPTED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commission~r Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Resolution 80-285 urging the citizens of Naples to support the efforts of the Italian-American Club in providing assistance to the victims of the earthquake in Southern Italy, as requested by the sponsoring organization, be adopted. . . . . . . -",'.^ ..~.. '~',~~\~ .,~ .~~ ::;'~; .",."'~'!I::',; i"If,. .1\0 '.,....:j.,'l , ,.,_,:,,;i~ Ifl~;' .... ...,~:,." I..",..t '''''.:If: -7i'.~~{ . '.:'~:~~~ "'Jf.~\ .:.~; .::rio,' .-'J,", " =,"'" ~ ~ [ii"''',;;,l ,bOOK 058 PACE289 December 16, 1900 BOARD AUTHORIZfS TAX COLLECTOR TO ISSUE DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATES NOS. ~(SALE OF 1972) AND 1069 (SALE OF 1972) Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the Tax Collector be authorized to issue Duplicate Tax Sale Certificates Nos. 1074, from the sale of 1972, and 1D69, also from the sale of 1972, issued to Arthur N. Ayers, * * .. * * * * * * * , :.~;; ,'~ '''~'''I''~~ ~!,:.)~~:T ;,~:: ",:,'~~1}' ',. :\',1__ J \f'~ ' . '::~:';}lf' ''''''1 .;>1<, " ;' ~:I'~ '" ".~' ~~{t .~r;;I. ';., .,~\l .w. December 16, 1980 BCC AFFIRMS ITS SUPPORT OF TWO CURRENTLY-PERMITTEO MOOERATE INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS AND INDICATES ITS DESIRE TO SEE THEM BROUGHT TO COMPLETION AS SOON ~S POSSIBLE Commissioner Kruse explained that her memorandum to the Board dated December 15, 1980 was prompted by an apparent misunderstanding on the part of some of the financial institutions and, as contained in the subject memo, there is a public misconception concerning the Board's position on the two moderate income housing projects which have currently been approved. It appears, said the Commissioner. that the misunderstanding seems to be that the removal of further permits is somehow related to these two existing projects. Pursuant to Commissioner Kruse's suggestion, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that the 80ard give public indication that it is in support of the two currently permitted projects and is anxious to see them brought to com- pletion as soon as pvssible. COMMISSIONER PISTOR REAPPOINTED TO SERVE ON THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA MENTAL HEALTH 8DARD, INC. Mention was made by Administrative Aide to the Board Grace Spaulding that, in his letter dated Dee, 8, 1980, Bruce C. Embrey, President of the Southwest Florida Mental Health Board, Inc. has advised that the Nominating Committee and the subject Board are desirous of having Commissioner Pistor reappointed to another two-year term, commenting January I, 1980. In reply to Vice Chairman Wenzel, Ms. Spaulding said that Commissioner Pistor has agreed to the appointment. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0 with Commissioner Pistor not present, that Commissioner Pistor be reappointed to serve on the Southwest Florida Mental Health Board, Inc. NOTICE FROM I'~OKALEE UTILITIES CORPORATION, INC. RE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM - REFERRED TO COUNTY MANAGER FOR FURTHER ACTION At the request of County Manager Norman, Vice Chairman Wenzel directed that the notice received Dec. 12, 1980 from Sam Heath, Chairman of the Immokalee Water/Sewer District, pertaining to the commencement of construction of the Sanitary Sewer System be referred to him (Mr. Norman) for further action, ~OOK 05B rAC[ 292 ....... -" _...._1 &ODK 058 fm 2.93 December 16, 1980 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE FILED AND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated: 1. Copy of memo dated 12/9/80 from Library Director to County Manager re temporary closing system headquarters at 5:00 P,M. on New Years Eve, 12/31/80 - Filed. 2. Letter datpd 12/8/80 from Col, \<1m, B, Hawley and Mr, Geo, Huberman, Marco Island, plus a map of Marco Island re effocts of speed of boats on Smokehouse Creek pertaining to users and the welfare of Manatees. ~c Mr. Norman; filed, 3. Copy df petition from seven residents re overgrown lots on 2nd St. in LIttle Hickory Shores; copies of "in-house" memos between Mr, Perry, Mr, Virta and Mr. Norman; copy of letter dated 11/26/80 sent to peti- tioners from Mr, Perry - Filed, 4. Leth' dated 12/10180 from E~ecutive Director Roland H, Eastwood, SWFRPC, re A.95 Project 180-279, Preappllcatlon - Community Develop- ment Block Grant. xc Planning/Communlty Development Depts - Filed, 5, Copy of letter from County Manager Norman to Mr. Walt~r Deim, re Resolution re Passenger Service to Venice, Fl. - Filed. 6. Letter dated 12/5/AO from Director Jose Pepr Lucero, ReVenue Sharing Office, Sec. of the Treasury, Washington, O. C. re President Carter's commitment to reauthorization of Revenue Sharing Program - Filed. 7. Letter dated 12/5/AO from Mrs. Virginia H. Brodigan, Naples, FL, re her support for rezoning all of Government Lot 1, Sec. 16, T49S, R25E from RM-2 to RM-IR and RJ~2ST to RN-IBST - xr Community Development; filed. 8. letter dated 12/A/00 from Bruce C, Embrey, Pres. Southwest Florida Mental Health Board. Inc., Fort Myers. FL. re reappointment of Henry B. Watkins, Jr. and appointment of Rev. flapes as alternate to Mental Health ROdrd: notation of 1/1/81 expiration of C~~issioner Pistor's term plus Board's wish to have him continue - Filed. 9, Copy of letter dated 12/2/80 from Lorraine Easterwood, CPS, Admin, Sec., BCC of Marlon County, FL. requesting a copy of Ordinance 180-6 prohibiting discharge of firearms - Filed. 10. Copy of letter dated 11/24/80 from District Transportation Planning Engineer Claude A. White, FL.. DOT to Mr. Barksdale re functional classification of all publiC roads, report needed by 1/9/8I - Filed. 11, Letter dated 1215/80 from J. FI Hyde. supporting B & B Disposal on Marco Island - Filed. 12, Copy of letter dated 12/4/BO from Homl!r C. Kelly, St. Paul, Minnesota, protesting "Rollback" zoning of property in Golden Gate Estates - Filed. 13, Letter dated 12/2/80 from M. C, Long, Chief, Fire Control,' Florida Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services to Civil Defense Director W. C. Walker thankin~ him for use of helicopter. xC OCC Chairman; County Hgr,; Public Safety Administrator - Filed. ,. .'4' , >1 c~~, ".~ di- J"\ , - December 16. 1980 14, Copy of memo dated 12/5/80 from Bureau of Loca' Government Finance re changes In collection and distribution of racing taxes re amend- Ment to Chapter 550, Florida Statutes, xc Harold Hall - filed. 15, Copy of DER notice dated 12/4/80 re public workshop on proposed rul.. identifying and listing hazardous wastes - xc Mr. Herzon; Mr. Barksda', . filed, 16. Copy of letter from Willard p, Griffith, Pres" Golden Gate Civic Assn. Inc" re displeasure In the manner In whlth the Golden Gate Auditorium was rented to Mr, Orville Hussey - xc County Manager - filed. 17. Letter dated 12/10/80 from Mr, Stuart Schram, Naples, FL. to Commissioner Kruse re ObjectIon to construction of proposed 20-story condominium at 4041 Gulf Shore Blvd.. No, - Filed, 18. Copy of memo from Mr. Ron Meserve to Collier County Mental Health Clinic. Inc, Board of Trustoes re Board ~~mbers Tralnin9/0rlentation - Filed. 19, Copy of memo dated 11/28/80 from A, J, McMullian III, State Retirement Director re Florida Retirement System Brochures - Filed, 20. Copy of ONR Permit No. Co-r-I2-80. issued 12/5/80 re Permittee W, R, Tlmkin, Jr. and project location and description criteria seaward of the CCCL. xc Community Development - filed, 21. Public Service Notice Docket No. B00200-GU re Timberland Utilities petitioning for a rate Increase. Filed. ' 22, Copy of Zoning Oept. Invest1gHions for October, 19t1O - Filed, 23, Copies of minutes. City of Naples November 7 and 19, I9tlO - Filed. Copies of Dept. of Social Services Report for September and October, 19t1O - FIl ed. Copy of letter dated 12/10/80 from Mr. Ken S. Nipper, Town Manager, Orange Park. FL.. requesting information re Subdivision Regulation wording. xc Mr. Vlrta; County Manager; Mr. Barksdale - filed. Copy of letter dated 12/10/80 from State Assn. of county Commissioners re data collection to validate the Touche-Ross Study on Local Govern- ments' Indigent 1ft-11th Care Expenditures. xc Dr, Cox: Martha Skinner; County Manager - filed. 27, letter dated 12/10/80 from Robert R. Hagaman re Collier County Ccinmissloners who will be named among the parties defendant In the death of Scott Johnson. xc County Attorney - filed. 24. 25, 26. 28, Letter dated 12/11/80 from Frank Alvarez, Jr. Asst. Appointments Coordi- nator, Governor's Office. Tallahassee. FL, thanking ncc for recommendIng Mrs. Mildred R. Sherrod for reappointment to CollIer County Housing Authority - Filed. Copy of letter dated 12/11/80 from Dr. Edward W, Houck, Exec. Dlr., South Central Florida Health Systems Council, Inc. notifying Commissioner Plstor of his selection to serve on Board of Directors with terM ending 4/83 - Filed, 29. 30. Copy of letter dated 12/12/80 from G. E. Friend, to Engineering Director T. E. Kuck, re ~rmit application 2827-A, plus copy of certificate to occupy permit No, 77-1459 dated 12/31/77 - xc Mr. Barksdale - filed. ,--~_....""'~.,,- ., il :<:1 .~ ..j I , '. , ,~ ~ . " j " t:;l;J 058 rACE~ ....... "i.it~i$21 ,..A'. , &OO~ ~ December 16. 1900 31. Copy of letter dated 12/12/80 from Deputy State Economist Dr. Karen Walby to Mr/Mrs. J. L. Dutton re their 11/11/80 letter re additional homestead exemption. xc Mr. Colding . filed. " There being no further business to come before the Board. the meeting was adjourned by order of the Vice Chairman. Timo: 11:30 A.H. BOARD O~ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX OFFICIO GUVEKNING BUARO(Sl OF SPE~I^L DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CUNTROL ATTEST: ; \) WILLIAM J, ...' . . .. - , 1 . . , .. .. ... " I, !'" 1', ""~' N.... :," ...~':\i ,:.> .\~ ."l