The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 09/11-12/2012 Item # 9Ai3`1 1-4 4& 02- 'a M STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Governor MEMORANDUM TO: Collier County Date: September 7, 2010 THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Objections, Recommendations and Comments Reports Enclosed are the Departments Objection, Recommendations and Comments Reports on the proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan(s) from the following local government(s): Collier County 10 -RAEC 1 These reports are provided for your information and agency files. Following the adoption of the amendments by the local governments and subsequent compliance review to be conducted by this agency, we will forward copies of the Notices of Intent published by each local government plan. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Ray Eubanks at Suncom 278 -4925 or (850) 488 -4925. RE /lp Enclosure 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ♦ TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 -2100 850- 488 -8466 (p) ♦ 850- 921 -0781 (f) ♦ Website: www.dca.state.fl.us ♦ COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488 -2356 (p) 850 48&3309 (f) ♦ HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850- 488 -7956 (p) 850- 922 -5623 (f) • r I STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE CRIST Govemor September 3, 2010 The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Coyle: THOMAS G. PELHAM Secretary The Department has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Collier County (DCA 10 -RAEC 1), which was received on July 6, 2010. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, we have prepared the attached report, which outlines our findings concerning the amendment. It is particularly important that the County address the objections set forth in our review report so that these issues can be successfully resolved prior to adoption. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. Within the next 60 days, the County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed amendment revises the Tokal a De artment has identified issues with the amendment regardin 1) lack of meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards in some of the proposed text language; and (2) the lack of supporting data and analysis demonstrating coordination of land using with public facility planning for the proposed revisions to the Future Land Use Map. Wbese ffied ft — t e attached report shoul I be a of the plan amendments. 2655 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 -2100 850- 488 -8466 (p) • 850- 921 -0781 (f) ♦ Website: www.dca.state.fLus • COMMUNITY PLANNING 85D408-2356(p) &%488-3309(f) • FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST 850-922-2207(p) 850-921-1747(Q • • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850488-7956 (p) 85D-922-5623(0 4 The Honorable Fred W. Coyle, Chairman / A September 3, 2010 Page 2 If you, or your staff, have any questions or if we may be of further assistance as you formulate your response to this Report, please contact Scott Rogers, Principal Planner, at (850) 922 -1758, or Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 487 -4545. Sincerely yours, Ca�rlesuthier, AICP Director, Division of Community Planning CG /sr Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments cc: Ken Heatherington, Executive Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division, Collier County Government TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J- 11.011, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the County must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; • copy of the adoption ordinance; • listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; • listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. . The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendment, and pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that the Florida legislature amended Section 163.3184(8xb), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted plan amendment (a sample Information Sheet is attached for your use). INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the Collier County proposed comprehensive plan amendment, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J- 5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. The objections include a recommendation of approaches that might be taken to address the cited objections. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. The County should address each of these objections when the amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections that are not addressed may -result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items that the County considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement, justifying its non- applicability, pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non - applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments that follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature. Comments will not form the basis of a determination of non - compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form the basis of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AMENDMENT 10 -RAEC1 September 3, 2010 Division of Community Planning Office of Comprehensive Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, F.A.C. OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AMENDMENT 10 -RAECI I. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163 PART II F.S. AND RULE 9J -5 F.A.C. The proposed Amendment 10 -RAEC 1 (CP- 2008 -5) revises the Immokalee Area Master Plan of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. A. Amendment CP- 2008 -5: The proposed amendment revises the goals, objectives, policies, Future Land Use Map (FLUM), data, and analysis of the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The Department raises the following objections. to the proposed Amendment I 0 -RAEC 1 (CP- 2008-5): 1. Objection (Plan Policies): The proposed amendment (Land Use Designation Description Section) does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the intensity of nonresidential use for the following future land use categories: Industrial Subdistrict; Industrial -Mixed Use Subdistrict; Industrial- Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict; Commercial -Mixed Use Subdistrict; Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict; Low Residential Subdistrict; Medium Residential Subdistrict; and High Residential Subdistrict. The proposed amendment (Land Use Designation Description Section) does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the percentage distribution of mix among the mix of residential and nonresidential land uses allowed in the Commercial -Mixed Use Subdistrict and Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict. The proposed amendment (Land Use Designation Description Section) does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the land uses that are allowed in the "Industrial - Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict" because the text for this Subdistrict states "allowable uses include all other uses deemed to be c e and consiste e adopted Airport Master Plan, as may be amended.' The proposed amendment does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the type of nonresidential land uses allowed within the Commercial -Mixed Use Subdistrict. Proposed amendment Policy 5.1.1 allows development to achieve density bonuses and other incentives in the Immokalee Urban Area if development exceeds the minimum required amounts of preservation already set forth in Conservation and Coastal Man Policy 6.1.1 ropos olicy 5.1.1 does not establis meaning and predictable guidelines and standards defining the amounts of preservation that would be required to receive the density bonuses or incentives. Proposed amendment Policy 5.1.2 states, in part, that proposed development adjacent to Lake Trafford will conform to best management practices regarding water quality in order to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to the lake and its surroundin ,wHands or natural habitat. Although the purpose of Policy 5.1.2 is to protect natural resour e3, Policy 5.1.2 does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the best management practices in order to guide the content of the Land Development Code. Proposed Policy 6.1.9 states that all rezonings must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but Policy 6.1.9 allows zoning to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan for properties that have zoning in place prior to a change in Land Use Designation where the prior zoning allows for a higher density or intensity than the new Land Use Designation. In addition, proposed Policy 6.1.9(5) states that "Overall intensity of development shall be determined based upon a comparison of public facility impacts as allowed by the existing zoning / district and the proposed zoning district o icy 6.1.9(5) does not establish meaningfu and predictable guidelines and standards for the intensity of land use that require the intensity of development to be determined consistent with the intensity standards of the applicable future land use category. Proposed Policy 7.1.5 states, in part, that Collier County will amend the Land Development Code to include a Central Business District in Immokalee, and the Central Business District will encourage high - intensity, multi -st edestrian- oriented ercial and mixed -use development s Po icy 7.1.5 does not establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the intensity of development. Rules 9J- 5.005(6); 9J- 5.003(3)(b)4.; 9J- 5.006(3)(c) 1., 4., 5., 6., and 7.; 9J- 5.006(4)(c); 9J- 5.011(2)(c)5.; 9J- 5.013(2)(c)3., 6., and 9., Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.); and Section 163.3177(6)(a), (c), and (d), Florida Statutes (F.S.). Recommendation: Revise the Land Use Designation Description Section to establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining: (1) the intensity of nonresidential use for the following future land use categories: Industrial Subdistrict; Industrial-Mixed Use Subdistrict; Industrial - Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict; Commercial -Mixed Use Subdistrict; Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict; Low Residential Subdistrict; Medium Residential Subdistrict; and High Residential Subdistrict; (2) the percentage distribution of mix among the mix of residential and nonresidential land uses allowed in the Commercial-Mixed Use Subdistrict and Recreational/Tourist Subdistrict; (3) the land uses that are allowed in the "Industrial- Immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict" because the text for this Subdistrict states "allowable uses include all other uses deemed to be compatible and consistent with the adopted Airport Master Plan, as may be amended." ; and (4) the type of nonresidential land uses allowed within the Commercial -Mixed Use Subdistrict. Revise proposed Policy 5.1.1 to establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the amounts of preservation that would be required when exceeding the amounts established in Policy 6.1.1. Revise Policy 5.1.2 to establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the best management practices in order to guide the content of the Land Development Code. Revise proposed Policy 6.1.9 to establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards that ensure rezonings are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Revise proposed Policy 6.1.9(5) to establish 3 meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards that require the intensity of development to be determined consistent with the intensity standards of the applicable future land use category. Revise proposed Policy 7.1.5 to establish meaningful and predictable guidelines and standards defining the intensity of development intended by the policy. 2. Objection (FLUM Amendments): Amendment 10 -RAEC1 ses ch use designations on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). a proposed amendment is not supported by an analysis (short-term five -year, and long -term planning timeframes) of the projected demand for and availability of potable water and sanitary sewer facilities and water supply based on clear assumptions regarding the combination of both residential land uses (at maximum density and population projections) an itonresi en is an uses ase on m ensi ar s established in the IAMP) at the adopted level of service standards. The proposed amendment is not supported by data and analysis addressing the following: (1) the projected impact (short-term five -year, and long -term planning timeframes) of the proposed FLUM amendments upon the adopted level of service standards of roadway facilities, including SR 29 and SR 82, based on clear assumptions regarding residential land uses (at maximum density and population projections), nonresidential land uses (based on intensity standards established in the IAMP), and background growth in trips; (2) identifying road improvements that are needed to maintain the adopted level of service standards; (3) demonstrating that any road improvements that are needed to maintain the adopted level of service standards are depicted on the Future Transportation Map (or map series) of the adopted portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and included in the Capital Improvements Element Five -year Schedule of Capital Improvements; and (4) addressing coordination of any needed improvements with the plans and programs of the Florida Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Ran re Transportation Plan and Transportation Improvement Program. The amen ment does not coordinate the ro improvements that are needed to maintain the adopted roadway level of service standards with the Future Transportation Map (by depicting such road improvements on the Map) and Capital Improvement Element (by including the road improvements that are needed in the 5 years within the Five -year Schedule, and by including the road improvements that are needed in the long -term in a policy in the Capital Improvement Element). Rules 9J- 5.005(2)(a), (5), and (6); 9J- 5.006(2)(a), and (3)(b)1.; 9J- 5.01l(1)(a), (c), (d), (e), and (f); 9J- 5.011(2)(b)2., and (2)(c) l .; 9J -5.013 (1)(c), (2)(b)2., and (2)(c) l .; 9J- 5.016(1)(a), (2)(e), (3)(b) L, and (3)(b)3., and (4)(a) and (b); 9J- 5.019(2), (3), (4), and (5xb)2, F.A.C.; and Sections 163.3177(6xa), (6)(b), (6)(c), (6)(d), and (6)0); and 163.3177(2), (3), (4), (8), and (10)(e), F.S. Recommendation: Support the amendment with data and analysis demonstrating the availability of potable water and sanitary sewer facilities and adequate water supply to serve the projected demands for the short-term and long -term planning timeframes. Support the amendment with a transportation analysis based on the maximum development potential of the land use changes (and growth in background trips) that addresses the transportation facilities that are needed to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards of roads and demonstrates coordination of any needed transportation facility improvements with the 4 M Transportation Element, Capital Improvements Element, plans and programs of the Florida Department of Transportation, and the Metropolitan Planning Organization Long Range Transportation Plan and Transportation Improvement Program. Revise the amendment, Future Transportation Map, and Capital Improvement Element (Five -year Schedule of Capital Improvements, and policies if needed) to be supported by and consistent with the data and analysis. If public facilities or road improvements are needed to address deficiencies in the short-term (five -year) planning timeframe, the improvements should be included in the Capital Improvement Element Five -year Schedule of Capital Improvements. If public facilities are projected to be deficient in the long -term planning timeframe, the County should maintain in the adopted portion of the Capital Improvement Element a list of the improvements that are projected to be needed in the planning timeframe but beyond the five years covered by the adopted Capital Improvements Schedule. This list need not include any cost estimates for the improvements. The County must use this list when it adopts the mandatory annual update of the Capital Improvements Schedule. Improvements to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards within the ne years s ould-be,mov from the list into the financially feasible five -year schedule, long with a cost estimate. Re ise the amendment if necessary, to be supported by and consistent II. CONSISTENCY WITH STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'Objection: The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments related to the objections raised above are not consistent with a not further the following provisions of the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes) for the reasons noted in the objections raised above in Section I: (a) Goal Ta (Water Resources); Policy 7.b.5; (the amendment related to Objection 2); (b) Goal 15.a (Land Use); Policies 15.b.1, 15.b.3, and 15.b.6; (the amendments related to Objections 1 and 2); (c) Goal 17.a (Public Facilities); Policy 17.b,7; (the amendments related to Objection 2); (d) Goal 19.a (Trans o ; Policies 19.b.3, 19.b.9, and 19.b.13; (the amendments related to Objection 2); and (e) Goal 25.a (Plan Implementation) Policy 25,b.7; (the amendments related to Objections 1 and 2). U20 L�1 � �I 5 "Massey, Lawrence" < Lawrence . Massey @dot.stat e.fl.us> 08/20/2010 04:10 PM Dear Ray, To DCPextemalagencycomments@dca.state.fl.us @dca.state.fl.us> cc "'scott.rogers @doa.state.fl.us'" <scott.rogers @dca.state.fl.us >, "Limbaugh, Johnny" < Johnny .Limbaugh @dot.state.fl.us >, "Cahill, Maria" bcc Subject Collier County 10RAEC1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Revised FDOT Comments Thank you for giving FDOT the opportunity to review and comment on the above referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment. We determined that there were formatting mistakes on the comments previously submitted on August 09, 2010. These mistakes have been corrected and FDOT Comment #10 has been revised in the attached letter. Please replace the department's previously submitted letter of comments with the attached. If you or your staff have any questions or would like to discuss the department's concerns, please let me know. Respectfully, Lawrence Massey Growth Management Coordinator Florida Department of Transportation District One, Southwest Area Urban Office at the Southwest Interagency Facility for Transportation 10041 Daniels Parkway Fort Myers, FL 33913 (239) 461 -4300 Fax: (239) 33$-2353 1Nm 082010_Collier_County_1 BRA EC1 Proposed CPA_FDOT_Comments revisedpdf Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CR1ST C:OV ERNOR Mr. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and Processing Administrator Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399 10041 Daniels Parkway Fort Myers, FL 33913 August 20, 2010 STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS SECRETARY RE: Collier County 10RAEC1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Florida Department of Transportation, District 1, has reviewed the proposed version of the Collier County I ORAEC 1 comprehensive plan amendments. This letter offers comments on the proposed amendments. OVERALL AMENDMENT prep sed amendments reflect an effectively rewritten Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP). The IAMP area is within a Rural Area o rlt)ca onom)c oncern an , e , community development and economic growth. In general, the proposed amendments include features that focus land use patterns to promote density and allow for increased opportunities for multimodal travel. However, while the submittal includes extensive documentation and explanation of the changes to the goals, policies, and objectives, the trans rtation analysis was insufficient to determine the extent of the impact that these changes may slave on the ^atiuraT ��tem nth internal an external tot a LAMP area FDOT's detailed comments and recommendations on the amendments that may potentially impact state roadway planning and operations can be found in the following sections. The revised IAMP includes eight new goals and corresponding policies and objectives. Therefore, the department's comments are organized based upon each of the eight new goals contained in the proposed IAMP. GOAL The purpose of Goal 1 is to identify the priorities of the LAMP related to annual capital improvements. The department has no comments on Goal 1 or the corresponding objectives and policies. GOAL The purpose of Goal 2 is to enhance and diversify the local economy. There are five objectives: (1) To actively pursue, attract, and retain businesses; (2) To create a business climate that will enhance and diversify the economy and increase employment opportunities and quality of life; (3) To promote and expand tourism, recreation, and entertainment within the economy; (4) To enhance and expand educational and cultural facilities and opportunities; 6 Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County IORAECI Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 2 of 7 (5) To promote and support development and re- development initiatives. The department has the following comments pertaining to the objectives and corresponding policies of Goal 2: FDOT Comment #1 Policy 2.1.3 discusses the use of wetland or habitat conservation banking to compensate for development within the Immokalee Urban Area. This policy identifies that incentives and regulatory requirements shall be included in the land development code (LDC) to direct mitigation to the targeted lands. Please elaborate on what incentives will be included in the LDC (such as transfer of development rights). FDOT Comment #2 Policy 2.2.3 directs Collier County to amend the LDC to create more flexibility for home -based businesses in the Immokalee Urban Area. While the LDC currently says that home -based businesses cannot create additional trips above the normal residential use, guidance should be provided in the comprehensive plan regarding allowed uses and limitations to ensure that the potential impacts of home -based businesses are predictable and are adequately accommodated by public infrastructure. FDOT Comment #3 Policy 2.3.3 states that Collier County will continue efforts to work with the Seminole Tribe to integrate future plans for a casino and address impacts of the casino, resort hotel, and other resort structures in the community. Policy 2.3.4 goes on to state that the county will encourage development of an entertainment area (outside Seminole lands) that is complementary to the casino and resort. Development of these uses is likely to have a significant impact on state Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways in the area, and no documentation of the transportation impacts associated with these changes is provided in the submittal. The department recommends the following: a. Development of the casino and resort on tribal lands should be coordinated with the county and FDOT to ensure that state roadways in the area will meet adopted transportation Level of Service (LOS) standards. b. Planning related to the casino, resort, and surrounding entertainment uses should reflect land use and transportation strategies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions per HB 697. For example, the casino, resort, and surrounding entertainment uses should be designed with a high level of internal connectivity and walkability. GOAL The purpose of Goal 3 is to provide diverse safe and sanitary housing for all residents of the Immokalee Urban Area. The department has no comments on Goal 3 or the corresponding objectives and policies. GOAL 4 The purpose of Goal 4 is to provide adequate and efficient public infrastructure and facilities. Four objectives are proposed: (1) Provide a comprehensive system of parks and recreational facilities; (2) Provide a network of roads, sidewalks, and bike paths to support growth and provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, motorized, and non - motorized vehicles; (3) To improve stormwater management and surface drainage; (4) To provide an efficient and economical solid waste management system. The following is a summary of transportation - related policies of Goal 4: • Policy 4.2.1 discusses priorities for pathways connecting residential and employment areas as well as schools, libraries, and other services. The Collier County 5 -year pathway plan will depict existing and planned connections and priorities based upon community input. • Policy 4.2.2 discusses long -range transportation improvements. The policy states that Collier County will explore the possibility of accelerating the implementation of the MPO's Long Range Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County IORAECI Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 3 of 7 Transportation Plan (LRTP) to support the stimulation of economic development. The policy specifically identifies support for accelerating; (l) the widening of S.R. 82 between I -75 and S.R. 29; (2) the construction of the S.R. 29 bypass; (3) FDOT improvements to state roadways; (4) the construction of new or expanded transportation corridors to Naples and coastal Collier County; (5) the construction of new collector roads. • Policy 4.2.3 discusses coordination between Collier County, FDOT, and landowners to identify preferred routes to connect the airport to the future S.R. 29 bypass. • Policy 4.2.4 discusses plans for safety improvements including pedestrian and bicycle improvements identified as part of a walkability study. • Policies 4.2.5 and 4.2.6 discuss consideration for expansion of public transit routes and encouragement of additional transit services such as bike -and -ride and medical transport. • Policy 4.2.7 discusses transportation concurrency alternatives for S.R. 29. The policy states that alternative methods shall be identified within two years to remove barriers to economic development. Consideration for establishment of a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) or Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) is identified. The policy also; (1) identifies limitations on exceptions to concurrency for certain locations (e.g., the airport and the central business district corridor); (2) identifies a need for case -by -case evaluation of certain project types (e.g., transit- oriented developments and job creation projects); (3) requires ongoing reviews of the exception process. The department has the following comments pertaining to the objectives and corresponding policies of Goal 4: FDOT Comment #4 The department acknowledges that Policy 4.2.2 is a statement that the county will encourage the acceleration of projects, but it is unclear whether these projects are needed to support the land use pattern and densities and intensities shown on the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Further, per the county's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), there are currently no capacity improvements to S.R. 82 and S.R. 29 funded for construction (including the bypass referenced in Policy 4.2.3, which is currently in the PD&E phase). The department also notes that the county and the Immokalee community can play a significant role in furthering planned projects through mechanisms such as impact fees and developer contributions. FDOT Comment #5 Regarding Policy 4.2.7, the department recommends that a TCEA or TCMA should be evaluated at least with each Evaluation & Appraisal Report (EAR). Therefore, it will be important for any proposed TCEA or TCMA to include performance measures, targets, and timelines so that the successes and any shortcomings of the TCEA or TCMA can be assessed. GOAL The purpose of Goal 5 is to protect important natural resources (including Lake Trggord) through development standards and policies. Policy 5. 1.1 discusses incentive programs and innovative land development regulations to preserve native vegetation. Identified incentives include transfer of development rights, density bonuses, development clustering, and flexible development standards within specified zoning areas. The department has the following comment pertaining to the objectives and corresponding policies of Goal 5: Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County l ORAECI Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 4 of 7 FDOT Comment #6 Additional information is needed on the proposed transfer of developments rights program and the density bonuses. In particular, upper limits on the amount of density that can be transferred and the density bonuses should be identified to allow for quantification of potential transportation impacts and to provide guidance for land development regulations. GOAL 6 The purpose of Goal 6 is to allow and encourage a mixture of land uses that are appropriate for Immokalee. Objectives and policies address mobile homes, zoning, compact development, and agricultural activities. Substantial revisions to the future land use designations are proposed. The department has no comments on Goal 6 or the corresponding objectives and policies. (Comments on the revisions to future land use designations are provided later in this review) GOAL 7 Goal 7 is intended to establish development design standards that are appropriate for Immokalee. This includes establishing Immokalee- specific land development code regulations related to allowed land uses, densities and intensities, landscaping, and signage, as well as promoting bicycling and walking through the land use pattern and pedestrian amenities. The department has no comments on Goal 7 or the corresponding objectives and policies. GOAL 8 The purpose of Goal 8 is the coordination of information between other governmental agencies. This includes coordination regarding economic development initiatives, redevelopment implementation, and government services. The department has no comments on Goal 8 or the corresponding objectives and policies. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS This section provides descriptions of the IAMP future land use designations, including revisions to current designations and introduction of new designations. The following table lists the adopted and proposed future land use designations. Revisions to the future land use designations include the following: Adopted Future Land Use Designations Proposed Future Land Use Designations Urban -Mixed Use District Urban -Mixed Use District LR Low Residential LR Low Residential MR Mixed Residential MR Medium Residential HR High Residential HR High Residential NC Neighborhood Center CMU Commercial -Mixed Use CC -MU Commerce Center - Mixed -Use RT Recreational/Tourist PUD Planned Unit Development Commercial RT Recreational Tourist Urban - Commercial District C Commercial -S.R. 29 and Jefferson Ave. Urban - Industrial District Urban - Industrial District ID Industrial 1D Industrial CC -1 Commerce Center - Industrial ]MU Industrial Mixed Use 13P Business Park APO Immokalee Regional Airport Revisions to the future land use designations include the following: i 9A Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County l ORAECI Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments -- FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 5 of 7 • Deleted future land use designations are Neighborhood Center, Commercial -S.R. 29 and Jefferson Avenue, Commerce Center - Industrial, and Business Park. Some of these designations are reflected in the new designations and revised designations. • The residential future land use descriptions are proposed to have only minor changes, such as Mixed Residential being renamed Medium Residential. The largest change is the addition of a maximum density that is inclusive of all density bonuses. Density bonuses were allowed in the adopted version of comprehensive plan but the various bonuses were not tallied and stated for each future land use designation. For some future land use designations, these new thresholds actually result in a decrease in maximum trip generation potential. For instance, under Low Residential, the proposed text allows 4 units /acre as the base density and 8 units /acre if bonuses are used, whereas the adopted text allows 4 units /acre as the base density and up to 12 units/acre if bonuses are used. • Low Residential, Medium Residential, and High Residential allow new commercial development, if developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). A table specifies the maximum amount of commercial development and the minimum residential density allowed for different PUD sizes. A similar table was previously provided under the adopted PUD Commercial future land use designation. • For Commercial -Mixed Use, the proposed future land use designation allows a maximum density of 20 units per acre with bonuses, whereas under the adopted future land use designation, a density bonus of up to 8 additional dwelling units makes it possible to-achieve up to 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed and adopted future land use designations are therefore consistent. • For Commercial -Mixed Use, no maximum intensity for nonresidential uses and no land use mix guidance are provided. • For Recreational/Tourist, the base residential densities stay the same at 4 dwelling units per acre; however, transient lodging densities are proposed to increase from 10 to 26 units per acre. • Certain Low Residential lands are proposed to be eligible for density blending. • For Industrial, no maximum intensity for nonresidential uses and no land use mix guidance are provided. • Industrial -Mixed Use is a new future land use designation. Allowed uses are described, but no maximum intensity for nonresidential uses is provided. Commercial uses cannot exceed 30% of total site acreage. • Industrial - Immokalee Regional Airport is a new future land use designation, which allows "all uses permitted in the Industrial sub - district' as well as "all other uses deemed to be compatible and consistent with the adopted Airport Master Plan ". No maximum intensity for nonresidential uses and no land use mix guidance are provided. • The Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System Overlay is proposed. The Seminole Reservation Overlay is proposed. The Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area boundary is proposed. The densities of underlying future land use designations are applicable, although lands with the overlay are not eligible for density bonuses. The data and analysis section of the comprehensive plan includes an assessment of the revisions to the future land use designations. Highlights of the data and analysis are as follows: • The proposed FLUM differs significantly from the adopted FLUM due to the revisions to the future land use designation and an effort to focus density along major roadways (i.e., S.R. 29). • Tables 5 -2 and 5 -3 show acreages for the proposed and adopted fixture land use designations. Tables 5-4 and 5 -5 group the future land use designations into categories and provide acreages for the proposed and adopted scenarios. Acreages for the various Future Land Use designations vary widely between the adopted and proposed FLUM. As shown in Table 5-4 and 5 -5 of the data and analysis, the residential designations have been reduced by about 636 acres ( -5 0/o), with a corresponding increase in industrial uses ( +462 acres, —17 %) and smaller increases in commercial ( +80 acres, —8 %) and tourist ( +201 acres, —80 %) acreages. The proposed FLUM includes approximately 100.6 acres of land added to the Immokalee Urban Area as part of an expansion of the airport. 9A Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County l ORAECI Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 6 of 7 • Tables 5 -7 and 5 -8 show the potential change in residential units in the LAMP considering the base densities for the adopted and proposed future land use designations. These tables indicate an increase of 6,731 potential residential units ( -10 %). Tables 5 -9 and 5 -10 also show the potential change in-residential units in the IAMP, but with consideration of density bonuses. In Tables 5 -9 and 5 -10, the proposed future land use designations result in a decrease of 30,853 dwelling units ( -18 %). • With regard to public facilities (including transportation), the data and analysis performed for the LAMP states that the proposed LAMP amendments "reflect an ideological change in how growth should occur in the Immokalee Urban Area" and "will not have an impact on the demand for public facilities". • The transportation data and analysis states that all state roads in Immokalee meet adopted LOS standards under existing conditions. This is consistent with the department's planning -level data. • Table 6 -9 identifies bicycle and pedestrian project priorities. • Section 7 of the data and analysis discusses HB 697 and identifies proposed goals, objectives, and policies that comply with HB 697. The identified goals, objectives, and policies address: (1) reductions in vehicle -miles traveled (VMT) through diversification of the community's economy (i.e., shorter trips), expanded public transit, encouragement of compact development, and consideration of a TCEA; (2) promotion of non -auto modes through the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and expanded public transit; (3) compact, energy - efficient, mixed -use development; (4) provision of higher - density development. ■ Attachment A to the data and analysis is a statement of how the submitted data and analysis complies with the Chapter 163, F.S., and Rules 9J -5 and 9J -11, F.A.C. Transportation LOS in the near and long term is not evaluated. The department has the following comments pertaining to the revisions to the future land use designations and the data and analysis: FDOT Comment #7 Maximum intensities (such as floor area ratios) are not stated for future land use designations that allow non - residential development. Some future land use designations that allow a mix of uses do not provide guidance on the allowed land use mix (e.g., maximum percentage of residential allowed). 9J- 5.005(6), F.A.C., requires "meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land". Please provide specific guidance about allowed land uses, densities, and intensities per 9J- 5.005(6), F.A.C. FDOT Comment #8 Regarding the proposed description of the Industrial - Immokalee Regional Airport future land use designation, allowing "all other uses deemed to be compatible and consistent with the adopted Airport Master Plan" is not a meaningful and predictable standard for development under the future land use designation. Please provide specific guidance about allowed land uses, densities, and intensities per 9J- 5.005(6), F.A.C. FDOT Comment #9 The data and analysis focuses on changes in residential units (density) and does not address changes in non - residential square footage (intensity). The latter may have a significant impact on roadways. The assessment of the changes to the future land use designations must therefore be revised to account for changes in non - residential square footage. At minimum, please provide a table analogous to Tables 5 -7 and 5 -8 to enable an assessment of changes in non - residential development potential. FDOT Comment #10 Near -term and long -term analyses of impacts to public facilities are required to support comprehensive plan amendments per 9J- 5.005(4), F.A.C., which states, "Each local government comprehensive plan shall include at least two planning periods: one for at least the first five year period subsequent to the plan's adoption and one for at least an overall ten year period." Please provide near- and long -term analyses of the impacts of the revised future land use designations on the segments of S.R. 29 (Emerging SIS) in the community and on S.R. 82 (Emerging SIS) just north of the community. Mr. Ray Eubanks Collier County 10RAECl Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments — FDOT Comments August 20, 2010 Page 7 of 7 If the segments are shown not to meet the adopted LOS standard in the near term with programmed capacity improvements in place, mitigation projects should be identified and added to the county's five -year schedule of capital improvements. If the segments are shown not to meet the adopted LOS standard in the long term, mitigation projects and/or detailed mitigation strategies should be identified, added to the Transportation Element and Capital Improvements Element, and coordinated with the LRTP. The department's planning -level data indicates that the section of S.R. 29 from downtown Immokalee at Heritage Blvd. to S.R. 82 does not currently meet the adopted LOS standard. Additionally, multiple segments of S.R. 29 and S.R. 82 that are likely within the impact area of the proposed amendment are projected to not meet the adopted LOS standard in the near and/or long term as shown in the following table: S.R. 29 Ref. Source: 2009 FDOT Quality /Level of Service Traffic Count Data and the FDOT Districtwtde Financially Feas: e M o e If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (239) 461 -4300 or lawrence.massey@dot.state.fl.us. Sincerely, �f Lawrence Massey District I Growth Management Coordinator LLM/1lm/ka Exist. E Exist. F FDOT D Daily E Exist. E Exist. 2 2030 2 2030 2 2030 From T To T Thru D Daily L LOS S Service D Daily % % of T Thru M Model M Model Lanes V Vol. S Std. V Vol. L LOS L LOS L Lanes D Daily D Daily Vol. L LOS New Harvest C C.R. 846 2 2 7 7200 C C 1 15855 B B 4 45.4% 2 2 1 14130 C C Rd C.R. 846 C C.R. 846 (V St 4 4 7 7200 - -- C 3 36915 B B 1 19.5% 4 4 1 19878 B B New Harvest C C.R. 846 (1st St 4 4 7 7200 C C 3 36915 B B 1 19.5% 4 4 1 17036 B B Rd. C.R. 846 (1st St 9 9th St. 4 4 1 11900 C C 3 36915 B B 3 32.2% 4 4 2 24651 B B 9th St. I Immokalee Dr. 2 2 1 11900 C C 1 17026 C C 6 69.9% 2 2 1 18953 F F C.R. 846 (1st St I Immokalee Dr. 2 2 1 11900 C C 1 17026 C C 6 69.9% 2 2 2 21039 F F Immokalee Dr, C C.R. 890 (Lake 2 2 1 14100 C C 1 17026 C C 8 82.8% 2 2 1 18412 F F Trafford) C.R. 890 (Lake C C.R. 29A 2 2 1 10900 C C 1 15855 C C 6 68.7% 2 2 1 18620 D D Trafford) C.R. 29A H Heritage Blvd. 2 2 1 14629 C C 1 15855 C C 9 92.3% 2 2 1 18124 D D 2 1 12335 C C 1 17026 C C f 72.5% 2 2 1 18524 F F Immokalee Dr. H Heritage Blvd. 2 S.R. 82 2 2 1 14629 C C 1 14200 D D 1 f 7 2 2 29741 F F Heritage Blvd. S 'bl d d l o e If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (239) 461 -4300 or lawrence.massey@dot.state.fl.us. Sincerely, �f Lawrence Massey District I Growth Management Coordinator LLM/1lm/ka SOUTH FLoRiDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT August 6, 20110 Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and DRI Processing Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, PL 32399-2100 DeEir Mr. Eubanks.- X-99arq0t A Ur, I Y � (,0 41-0 comm"L1111,91o1v OF UNITY PLANNING �U ec": Collier %G=n`Nv 0,-*A "ORIA-LELA o Dj Ap I orripmenen: MyenAmeni racKa-ve Sive Vian A i i le Suuio F-ionda Waiu Mianauernerar. Districi (ijistrict) has cornpietea its review OT Ine ;I_ 4tv (G'ouniv). i ne aryienameni propose to ij;-,jP0f.zer. Eld lei furl tel"It U. Ii "'W"Hile: Atea ivaz tei' Hall Groi,vifl > tit iii jar) 1.11 IVIV,.. SUr"lutt; io" the arer" is 13TH immog;4:PIR Goal 15 (A lile 1,1 rl"I _korRilor al,10 lilt, to W il.t.il v,�e l*eaue.sj vc.lu e l:;,.0 (Jul respul-,-L: to Ill-. I.,clurity, f f loaLlinwe o. st that directly disch aroe into thm nnirknnrLzW k4. ch I ke Trafford, and Ce-mo Kenis, 0:4e�S Irl ti- le ja.lu use latu-fl�- afe pfl- -i - UPU,;-U LU ij- o VVIthook "llittrisky Standard-, o rpelo 14 lice orr nin -ful:14 Jt M nc[ 1-;e_�-_;';L,.R canno� be fiw -6 Val VVIRte., (10,11 ificitiCle firl 1-he is. I A. t 61 "-n-0 An:.4,iyts;,i.,4 se.,;dkon iriow the irnmokalet- V'Vawr and SevAe; 1(00KIsl�! i"I densivu, atio in ie IJ bi., 4te i�lea Master Plan, WI)OSe, 3301 Guv- Club Foad, We5t Pair- L,_.pch SA89 - I 3W j6 • I WI L-W M:jjr% A jdre-3S- V I r 9 716 Scott, W Ray' To <DCPextemalagencycomments@dcastate-fl-us> <scottra@doacs.state.fi.us> cc 07/23/201010:30 AM bcc: Subject FDACS LGCP Amendment Review FDACS has reviewed the following LGCP amendments and has no objections. recommendations. or Hernando County 1"- I-utnaryl Count 1U====Zt:K L--a- UOUMV 3 L3`Z LA fv4;5 ilroU-fl Pr -1 V— Lull kii-Put-' Qr V, a, i-Liflurd. vYl ITZI:Xi ,qnllthwest August 6, 2010 Realional Planning 1926 Victoria Avenue, Fort myers, Floridr- 77 (23`�)-338-255550 Vay Kevi-cv and Processing Adn-6,nisir,'A 1 Derartmer-I cf Comn-tunliv Aff3irs of State Plam-- nllo T, 2555 S, T J,ke. Cohier County i DCA WkALDC-I Dear Mr. Eubanks: �Ihc Sf g -)Jjt�yl �- 7 r revie 07: amendments (DCA ioj�kEC- I) to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. These to the rcquireme-its of thl- 'k-c" rev. — , e were pc Development Regulation Act. Comprehensive Planning anU LanG IJC W:;-. --irncnt at its Se--i"r 16 C0,111c'' Council staff has recommenGea tnat C.ouncii find the proposed amendments to oe regionally significant and consistent with the Strategic kegionai Policy Plan. g t3 COUT A O-f- t,h- -fficiat attachcd. if Council action differs from the staff recommenciation, we wiij nomy you. Sincerely, soukllwesi F106da RI-givilal N1,11"Ing cou"CA, x -A Ktl.�- Lh I Dire"'ar V B. / T) V C Attachment I Gro-; ' N-isnFuct-Ae-ir Div�, Nick C�':S31:11'11L dp. Deputy AO!Inlil, si-L'Or, P'RWI 7��, anc ' t, ' . . Collier County A EN XYN E N . C COLLIER COUNTY to 01 The C-o-'Uncil staft, has reviewed proposed arn.endmients t the Collir-- 'L- antv .1 Comprehensive Plan (DCA IORAEC-O. These amendments were developed under the l m RegulatiL & I Loca Govcnunerit - e .-g ' A synopsis of the requirements of the Act and Council responsibilities is provided as 'C'0111ritefl"S kffe f.-r-vieled "r. Attachment 11. Site location rnaps ca., b reviewed in Attachr-rient M k .3 ofthe proposec -v.,as baisce on whether `,i: ey viere ii! elY V 0' L regional concern. This was GeTCTMinCGJ through assessment of the following factors: o regional a. uch that it .1vity center, s rn,--,-,, a impacts the regional resource or facility; on or within one mile of a county iv lon Url-dary; gencially; applied to s'tc--- of 111%,e acres or size a c ts not necessarily a determinant ofregionai significance; old fbi a, E"....,opment of Rcgiol, I to or greater than the t.-aresh impact of the same type (a DRI-related amendment is considered regionally S , ffica-11t); art-,'- I g1li 3. Character-of a unique type or use, a use of regional significance, or a change in the flot the 10 plan that coullud be- apphed draotigh uh = updates, editorial revisions. e-Ec, are not regionally significant. -A surrurnary ofine results of the review follows: P; Factor-cz oll'Regional Signilfic.n... i�-M—endment Location iv nikude Character Consistent CP-2008-5 yes yes yes (1) regionally in-unoka--p Area sIgirl-ficant-, arld Master Plan (2) consistent with SRPP staff Ut o-ze staff to zominews. A comments to the Department of Community Affidirs and CoillerCounly. 08110 '9A Attachment I LOCAL GOVERNMENT C'OMPREHE'NSIVE PLANNINt_"= A.ND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT Local Government Comprehensive Plans The Act requires each municipal and county governs -lent to prepare a comprehensive plan that must include at least the following nine elements: I , Future Land Use Element; 2. Traffic Circulation Element; A local government with al .l or part of its jurisdiction within the urbanized area of a Metropolitan Planning Organization shall prepare and adopt a transportatimi element to replace the traffic circulation; mass tr- nsit*, and ports, aviation, and related facilities elements. (9j-:).0l9(1), f~Af:;.j s. Ji;iCra }. ' h ci' Gt`,'C? G° 't }d `3S`` Dr Drainage, a-if} � S3L� 31C Y"•l3tt r i5i Natural Groundwater .Aquifer Recharge Element; 4. Conservation r,le 7iesit; 5. recreation a-rid Open Space Element; 6. Housing l .sail: nt; %. Coastal lvMariagement Element for coastal jurisdictions; ritc rgoV iTiizGxa ai i�•oordin t-on r-Ae ne t' and 9, Capital Improvements Element. s .. }.oCal go`dC`rillneri` may a+cL optiona e -n"-: S (e. �., i Cirri- iriZ»iity desliln- redevelopment, safety, historical and scenic preservation, and economic). A111 local goveiilrient5 in .c3`out}"west forida nave adopted "evisvc, plaids: Charlotte County, Punta Gorda Coll`a£r ounty. 'L vor'etla- c ,, City, Marco wiani , Naples, les,, Glades County, Moore F iaven %tniir'y° County, Clewiston. 3 =l '_ii� l-ee County, Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Fort ivivers Beach. Sanibe} Sarasota County, Longboat Key, North Fort, Sarasota "Venice rage i }xftai_si' it_tE 4 cme,:e3ens e i 3an amen torments i9A A local government may amend its titan twice a year. (t mcndmcnts related to developments of regional Impact.. certain small e°veiopments, compliance agreements, and the .lob Siting Act are not restricted by this limitation_) Six copies of the amendment are sent to till' - tepartrnent of €..,orrunullis ;' Affairs for review. A Copy is also sent to the regional planning council; the water management district, the I iorida Department of Transnortation, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. (s. 163.3 I 84(3)(a)1 The proposed arnCndnient will d- reviewed by DCA In two `s'ituations. in the firs9, there must be 'a written request to DCA. The request for review must be received within forey- five days after transmittal of the proposed ,"amend *Went. [s. 163.3184(6)(a)1 Reviety can by requested by one of the following: th,- locA nnvernment t? "--?'Tailsmils ti'P B:t eP''rr(,!V% • the regional tiianniiig council. or • an affected person. �1 !; Cpl ! review Y rC .Ce amendment lAf tho9u ill the second situation, DCA can e i e tc ie til proposed i _ t request. in that case. DCA must give notice wittiin thirty days of transminat. [(s. 163.3184(6)(b):� Witnin give woricing days after declo -ing to coiltiElir --t a review, 1. ?�H_ must forward e-wies to various reviewing agencies, including the regional planning council. [s. 163.3184(4)1 Regionsi ilanning C ouncil Review fie regional planning, cot!nc:ll il'li1St submit its �Cc.- lyinlents lip 'i7:riting within thirty CI?yS of receipt of the proposed amendment from DCA. it must specify any objections and may matte re ,'ommendations for changes, The review of the proposed amendment by the regional planning council must be limited to "effects on regional resources or facilities Wentitiet ill till' Strategic reglona! pot€ y plan and extra.- ltirisdif -bona impacts it }iie�}i would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected local government. (s. 163.3184(5)1 After receipt ^f comments from the regions= planning council and other Teviewing agencies; INCA has thirty days to conduct its own review and determine compliance with Stz'te l ?` '. ,lYiti in that th' -r jf-day erio^, DCA transmits its written comments to the local government. T�Tnrj�= TT'{ �. FtVIE YS A STMT PT_tiP:t",n VFPSr.ON O T"V— LA�V> PY No Ty,! ti. sa( XrTi ( {�la 'J' i'S cNTt� atj' � T iE' i�j,i_1 t�':'} V. li Yuf't L AY" +r"e-f '01 UNO REGiONA1, P[,.A�.NNING CO 1. 1, C"011ier County 2, A.m.endme"t Ntir"(Ser- DCA iOkAEC,-'[ 3. Did theI&C j)renare tee Irian AMCDOInCnt: (YES) (Dili) No 4. bate OCA !Notified 1&C that AIDenCiMeELE raCKa2e WaS %_()mj)jCte, 11 ADDII[CaDle: ju I y 8, 201 bate Amendment Review must be C and an I ranSM I tted to OCA: P,ugust 6- 2010 A "�te the P-Wiew woe Trarsmitted toDCA- August 6, 2010 his amendmenlL is a Collier Co: niy iriftialled change to the Coun'Ov's Comprehensive Plan that w1h provide for the inunokafee Area Master plan (iAmP) and the immokalee Area Plan tha i., ib- s to the entire hhaster i i Master Plan Future IN-4) _ revision Land Use iV1-s_!P (FLIJU and the allowable includes: !) increases to the commercial acreages, the industrial acreage, Cat orrie off the exi sti ng lanct LISC, �rea- 2, tin-ninaiion re-stdcritiai developmen( in the plarulinc�, � I / the irranokalee Regional AimorL designations; 3) creation of a new land use designation for ti site; and 4) addition 04: -approximately 103 acre-, presently designated A gri CU i tUrMl ilR lira I I within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area as identified I I ied or the countywide F t9A R. Ts the Amendment copsisteint with the Strategic Regional Policy Plarn. t'P_2008_5 The proposed Immokaiee Area Master Plan GAMP) intends to implement the Immokalee community's vision, as approved by the Itnrnokalee Area Master Plan and i�%isioning Committee (iAlvM' C) by encouraging economic development and efficient delivery of services through greater densities and intensities in the planning area. The revised TAMP nror es dense. clustered development along major thoroughfares That then transition into lower densities and intensities in land uses away from the thoroughfares. The proposed plan amendment utiIize-5 start growth principals and provides greater flexibility through rnixed use u ,districts. _fhc revised Immokalee Area ILL .2 identlzies to the geographic planning ar(la. ;peciSic ally, the proposed amendment to the IAMP element of the County's Cro.y'ih M, iaf� rnclgt rinli / tJv-P) t�ropose eiiz t nt-W 90ais, eacf2 with rt soe f��P rJ }�jF��i!Y'°S �?rlal policies. The new goals are then followed by tee revised Land Use- j)esignation Description 3' f tliJl2. This Suction dpSr-ri n °s the iroL't}S Lt ]and Ilse designations that �xrlf 2111!�p patterns +3I Cievvfl(�tnent witlllli tli.° timflKislee url3aniZed area and iN!II fiiaia;er Ll;e proposed gouts tliroug' Standards Set fbrth within each land use designation and through ex ianations of the types of allowed larid uses that can be -:.quested .:'iu,in the planning area. The following are SGnlfl flI the Ti7ajGr :17aiIgCS pr�itiflSed by the a231GnLimGrii request: i raI� e R e-configuration of the !yetia -und boundary that c_- I2 -necis to L & e Trafford/Camp KeaiS Strand System C;veriay. This revision was requested by County staff; s 1?e- oesignation oT the ]ands «rithin the prat ndary of ili¢ IITlt joka1ce Regional Alrn ^rl * {APO l.3'orn industrial (Ii.1 i to Immflkal:,e Regional. Airport Subdistrict (APO); rep•UsPd ttJ ' rerrifldGd lion? t]? - RLirai land's m Addition t2I ± l i1� acres nr laTi i 11221 -Lire p r Stewaruship Area Overlay ( SLA) and be included within. the boundary o. the irxlmokalee l:egianal Airport Subdistrict (APO); J iCCBSS SrOr2 t[2f li xJE21ee te `i�' 7p Road,, 0411ich iS PrOPOSed t.0 al!? fYdirip2 GhL }regional Airport and Florida Tradeport Areas. to SR 82 to SF. 2 -5; and �tev sions to the land use design�!ilons in t e IAlVlr l4LO -I'Vi that i:ii,iuu : g - I ) An 2ncrcasc In Base density ahoWed within the nlixed use t;Gsignatc 3 areas. No change in bas? denslt r (dv-re !!ng units /acre - DUMO is 'Proposed within The I-,o%vk "JiGCiiuii3. 1�ii5ai or S� �i�`SiQilateil arecas; ;1 -ote ltini Cl -ve ling, L uLts that 2) Am increase of about 1.5 percent in the number, could be developed through, the base density; 3) il- hanges in the Prl'�_5 murn ^e nsity allowed within the lf2SAr res idential designation (reduction i and the mixed use designation (Increase).- j nntP,P.2 °sa] 6velling units that t u ?X "'i3 s llii' °r l C t u tion wolald be allowed in the 1 rvIP; _ ar rPC oT -L. e n 'i L' St ; � t) designated, lanais_ An increase n —201 aC- cF �tlL__3i '} ri 3lloweo density that can be requested withili Llie 61, A:, increase on the cap c . In�mokalee L r raun f;reu '?a dens r -n r: g froi3 rnaximl of i % Di J tai ? cap s of No DU /A; 7) A 5 percent reduction of residential designated lands. This change of over ±636 acres of residential designated lands are proposed to be re-designated to allow commercial and industrial development, as well as uses that are "owed under the RT designation; 8) An increase of +.80 acres of commercial designated lands; and 9 An- increase of zi:462 acres of industrial -designated lands. This increase includes the re-designation from industrial (ID) to immokalee Regional Airport Subdistrict PO" of 'I _48A auTes of !a-nd t at are part of the Immol-al— Regional Lh boundary. !er ha. e he CrOunty staff reporl sta es firiatt the a—mendinents %vould fisca mpact on o' County. I I he commitments included in trie proposea plan. A4hich translates into operadonai M. as a Set tin-le imp-a--ts, impacts, as frarr.-I to fulfill Such progra matic and fiscal conm itinent, will require finding and allocation of County staff that may not be readily avaiiabic. County stafff believes that the proposed IIA-1xV mwY not h1w,,o an it -m-- n e d i -a t e i m-p a c t on the deniand for public facilities, but v,111 impact future demand for public facilities. in i addition, the Pro'Pose Plan may of so-me C.ounty,'Ar-Ide effors 1.0. 11-• L I lnu-noKwlee Urban Area in 01- fiRure, To address this issue, the proposed ainencinient foal Il would adimv 'he Couni- Lo priio 'tize capita' prpjJects, programs and studios and anv otft-r cornm itments witi. the proposed, plan .0 —Z - "I .,) d G# ais7 Objec-u-ts A-nd Policies of the i.,ju"ViF CLn an matt ave necessary f rhf- nrt_,jg S_U .) I annual basi:;. Ojz�jzctivc_ i-I requires UrIC Corrununity ,cdovelopment -A.2oncy (Ct'�A) to level a list (•1f PI-10riti-Is of com-Mitmtrits, as ell a 1-1-I'VITIg Patp-ritial ailernatiVe funding sources to frufflil' such cornm itments. In addition, Policy I.I.i allows for the emens;on by the Board of, County Co.miniss-ioners f� the timefrarnes allocated to consideration of avallab;.: fulfill t e co,-nrnjjrnerns with the pro-oserd iAj').�i , subitLi to is t' Tiding andior operational constraints. 9. Ped QIT IT Livabic ComrPurifties thal LITZ th- A V= ZQZ7,T,7.UZ*w anu qft'er reslc!tnts a '�viee r-am-e unia emuiLlymen-7 upportunirk- "er residents a high qivailty Strateg- - Devc")z ::vIa-bilo-, imcg-rated coirmn-unities that of, i I of life. programs that p7om to intill dovelopment in u-iban a-i-cas IM -j- ISI I Ia II t_--U 'Wre- I h of jr.' gt US C' .ctlun 2: NVork vvith localf goverrurnents to prornoic stru,_-tu.-Cs -_�n'-A' devc-11ozo-n-i-rits 'S r, ntial 1 Ps as a mean,- of Providirify, that combine comirner-ciall and reside, housing that is affo.-dabie and nf--.r cmpioymnent opporturiftics. ama til nrovi-az T nr i flai 4.E: J,hrarne cornmunifice at, iLme-; to improve eu lz -V tj fif z 5 "S' -, f. -. is an i tv , 1 OliT bl rf:t ^^r iu it design ll stratecry; t`° OTI'Mrs rtvi i` iC iLi d`:velopment i=r ncipl es Mat protect tiffs• �egion's na oral r%SGLIrC•eS ?:,� 3!!�- a :mrr � ?L �? c; lal?�` Of lire. provide- for w Working =-with 3.11 levels Or O9Gveini�tie-nt ti l' -'r_ �G.z�h�v ^Si T'(rrid= .1�.4'tia',sa �: ai � vcl - � plan, for 1 r-� ds t n-r have been _squired for nat r-11 r°Snei r�: purposes iV Liv iiialeii%iined and mi- anaTed to Pr` S` -'fit � _' environmental int•gritr. /1CC10:i is iilSure Tiat ^v�uv tit'iiilCS LGr ga vermnental i,artnerships alit �i'i 11-C �xtJ L. = tflt rSiil S 1 j�iiSEiVi �-'HUI!Zc n'�: izal`` ft, u maxlm; zed. l n�sett? c tiiFF°a's`_F`Lf LlFrt' Goal is A weft- maintaincd social, ticaith, and educational infrastructure to Suilport n;F3ine£S Lind incrust . StratcI': Ensure the adiquacy Gi lands r'or commercial a n industrial Ci i,ic:,a, with S.lita,bi? services provi -`red. A, coon L: Adentiry %iilStii�e urriarl lands and LrciiiSl'i0i,atiori CGdGiS for da VEIGpiFlEiit Gr redeveloptntrit_ and ensure adequate access and seYviccs are, provided. �eti42li ''I: include in planning Ci'LGi€S Cite recognition Gi lands i%aitl'i natural L...t rc tt data r r ?r ar, .3 aTSiS, ? ?'id capacity . zacces `s ifi�i.3?., p lx.,i.i., Y � i a c7tl } i � i l- adequate public iaciiitiCS. deviel -o 5`ier t s i i ac = fsd . ^atiES and i! ;-,a ,. slli.tpble urban areas. Regio3nni Cooperation (foal 3: if ective resource nnar9a�ement IS iIIaiIItalIIea ma i vs, ^v Fiic #i7riler a of so ere. ,in P,1130r_ ngencirA, Stratepr: tilt pjans Concerning, t ,e same resource Shall nave as objJectives the sa ne effective, results. flcIloII 4°: i�i,G `i ? .�C will pTo ijole State. reElGnai acid IGCai agencies IO one i t-:t h, curt, ^;Icier ands Identified as �i1Cirii aaa: •ia�,•.fit Sv:' =.tae v.. %lia:. Laloosahatchee fbver{. and, areas areas formally designated as Cri[Ica.I natural ter Ltie Ll43rIl.#a i iLFILhe3 a�l Li- incorporated in he Cagenc -y's natu al E-J L resource management programs and :irf3vlalE 1piErgoveil'i,ia2iital coo, 'C127Ia?it3r ftr, t?i° }aia lelneritatl7;i of FT2Ti<ge°i1 - °s'it ^r >. ^,tiC£S tllizi, based on existing ciata, would be CXi3eCIed to result iii iiiaFFltaii,iilF ilaiitat Cvs�diLFt)IiS Air the panther. #3. `l'hc effects of the YrGposerl rnen rnrr,.t ar€ cgi.3FSS# eSGisrce's �;r "s eFiiiicS sc #eiztific::s in the Strategic %egiollai eoiicy flail: a�s'W�i3t�fi_� .. The proposed .LAVIvii' Impacts a variety oI regional resources and iaciiities that, are identified in the Strategic Regional poi-,c -,r Plait and Include: 4 1) Changing the configuration of the wetland boundary that connects the Lake Trafford /Camp Keais Strand, both regional resources, and providing an overlay to address development levels and conservation efforts allowed in the wetiand area; 2) Re- designating lands within the boundary of the Immokalee Regional Airport from it r ?I�atri<�l I«zid uses to an airport specific land use identified as the Irnmokaiee Regional r=irp:ort Subdistrict (APO), which addressed specific air-port issues. This I?r?plc ac eTc� `r; -f-i si ,.,..r v nf',nj,^ri TA !�° r'�r"i-`!� 2r^ ? ^`t redcsi'R•nated •>, ._s r;, tae,c:• 1-. 1 E ' ^ :.r. .:;f ,! ._ .: >v rural Lanes 'tewarLsi?Ip %pea Overlay (R1 SA, 1 and in within The boundan _d't Adding the concept o? a : Loop-, Road,'` which Is proposes to allow acce!. fro nn L he e.' '7 .. rl I'D yi2 1 -:ere- ni 'e �-, ,•el.7 er=- iF e�.,/ na. - ir•'`_rort ems,, -d `:iE;rjita T r -':;gip i:i .r °3s, ._., .. _sfcc., which are regional roadways; and 4) •t -- hanging ti?°, land ise designation.: tb ?t inCIM -ded: a) an increase in the erase density allowed iii the mixed use designated areas: + b-) ar, increase nr al-10"IT 1! -1 na___ -. r-,t in the number ^4 _ ^1. °riii�i �=,e -- psi ";.�" l.:.ii: ii; +'':. i ;- �, could he deveioned through the base density. nr c!f e ^_,n addit• oral 6,730 n1a in r_�e County staff analysts, tn•n.se changes Y^,;- •rf+ = -. _ {L:::G. , dwelling units allowed In the iMA_P. r_ ) a rj ?_ °hw f i^{L.., -n ?i Q low r� sarRrE?i (rte and the I-itixed use designated areas (increase), ii) an i f7crC i3 rtti iu'ilClii Iii t -le M.FI�•diiI11111a i'ii3lil'�iS J3 potinitial ti: ''ding units, t 3a Would be ?11ol ed in the IAMP. l c,,. tar- vrfl; .g Tom{ the Cc!!-nTly ct'.°afF ?nal Ykesy these Pj`in iTP °: r ^b:c�? repr °4-.,.: 30,593.4 dwelling units from what is currently allowed to develop ire t le J AsVfii' . ,.t .,v 7a lI' �tr..I�,s`: :.l l3i "'s council staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the County's t.omrreeleiiSlVe Plan With +� the 1.' -'_��P and find no n:- r-4`i- eN:`a jurisdiv''•Mn l impacts that ;'-.oul � �rc ,-s c inconsistent with the afimied local government_ n u ents on- the ?€`-_ii�l6eriny ig ._3_ - T elite nvtf?nr r'rI�1 }1e;b� ng gnF n�f��tn rn Ind r??'E?[±sl.�, - -f' 4E'?�no'?€I__' '- - - _ .,.� -.. _ _ _ t l a Are aaaressea in trip Sai tI "te is tkeeIonal Yoiic- ! i1n 001 1L. C; rripatiDilitysr i- sRiong iocait titlark ilreiunirlg, out not 1jinitca to. tai o use aria t'p yiiilFt_S Council staff h•£ ; rYiP rrnpgo� 1 Pr uizp 1l ? Tian nYe;il � Iii tle;n - 3:tt�ine.1 SI%Ci agrees a3-i�i Siipports the County stein that the proposed changes - movides smart. g7to i-h t`!??x^ .^?� - ^r :, :!:les f ?r ...i mr3ra sustainable ornmi- 1,{' -T =' given the. rer3uct. on In �t ;,palling - :e S a units and the rrore appropriate locations of the mixed use development pattern along the pngn heh -171d Mid z r av id to th- n;;,� a.Tea �� ..e nlac'•ng >wir.e d ::. {¢$ ..�,___ .:,:a rnalor ?aCl f sysil?T?.� :. 13ia - - I away t- om those. IflCreased densities. CivYTI the +.iittllc t]Opillatioll projects Ior tne r_uclri€ �rec. :ounc•3l star agrees with th° proposed G'.�at'_anges in tho tiurnber of d rcUin Units provided in the Immokalee urban area and the arrangement of residential, commercial and Industrial land uses. Based on the Plan presented in this amendment request, Council staff finds that the proposed changes to the County's Plan is compatible with local planning efforts. 'While there will be a future military presence at the immokalce Regionai Aim-01--L in the --future, southwest Florida has no military bases in the region to be considered. - imparts to significant regionai resources and far iiities identified in the Strategic ; not Nrr:i� i- �-r f--,,UnAS E i , t: and We avananifit-V of water supply* The Pro-Dosed amendments do no substantially impact the regional water recharge aria han—, pro—s—" to improve re subject cli-a-5-` Y Y" W�fter supply situations in the I— a— the wetland slough that flows into LLEiiKe Trafford bv reducing the dwelling units that can t be Ane ax-d increas" tJ it h-2 proposed endme,ilis re-111 bui!t I*-. That -n,n1mral arl - - of the areas dwelling units. The increased densities in the urban area of irrursokalee should nrovicc increa„r,.� oDcn space a7ca's and tncrxc�y Mnn,ove groundwater rccharr^ Tfi-- Droposed Comprehensive Plan changes will not change the County's 104car Water Supply �u z p- e p I ian. 'Res Tot arrord-able llow;t -:�:,ng chnracterist— of CoHiCT, th:� z1fo'dable to, �,hc exisTing economkv ?-rld The 'tn housing issue in the County is complex and has not been comT-,ictelY addressed. While, the- at 7 tn- cozstal urr7m areas boen sornewhalt red-uic'-d due To the economic downrlinn, it is sfili a problematic as It relates to housing for service provlciers -Cnt 7esiden0a i Areas "ft'C affo7dnhff Issur r, In 1nr.nokr-c is somewhat different in that the immokaice areas - is medominately an I agricu , it-ji-al TT:- vor�-C---� D7 of less C-1�1--Pens. - fa- n Irrast to the urbanized areas along the coast. At the present time, there are newer e,q. - ' unty and therefore the c--7,-,F-rA fOT tam, %vo7f,---- is Mcultji-,al -workers -,n IM-e Co somewhat reduced- When fully developed, the proposed elan amendments will improve 1 .',0 7j<- . 'I" the riousing stn-k it the I=Tnok-alcc area anc pro -vide no,,ts.ng for the scr-Vi . cc C7,c�; 1-, 1— urbanized area of Irnmokalee. Cou..cil staff agrees with the smart grow-Ln concepts found CJ1,7=717 3-,Id n:7liew— that the se-,v--. V.10171,CT-S that WI!! H-VC h f "e, M the worker housing that is often urbanized area of whe community Will be satisiled. The farm a pann as locatcc Ovtsr!�- of ty need addiTinnzOi ar��!vs,s in tl�� arc;a m,. dema-ld increases as t I ne economy improves in the future- jr 7 t -i - s j z z T T Regionai eoiicy Plan including, but firniteri to, and grounamlaTer protection of spring C P-2 [off 8-5 The proposed r) I an ornmndments WIll imPTO-VC Vie nattirl, resources <rounfd �,ake Traffmc and the wetland systems that flow into that regional resource- Ail the envirorinnentai Goais, 4 still O jectives and Policies found in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan are still enforce to 6 9A provide protection and conservation of the regionally significant natural resources found in the Immokalee planning area, including groundwater resources and recharge potential. In addition, the proposed, changes recommend that dwelling densities in the wetland slough that flows into Lake Trafford be reduced, which will increase the potential for recharge e an water quality improvements. There are no springs in the area that will be impacted 11-v fhe proposed amendments. I . - A 0 t •r'�O k p n i a- tio n e G- r ri d o r s a u Q -1 1 S -W-h `inp, bu* nut r.n p a iimiteo to, roadways, sea DI-Orts, airports. DOMIC 117HUSPOrtatiOn --SV -0-M& -nigh spec n rail f 7 Ige W • trV_' P", transj"ofta!son .ed -jrtridments provide a significant rhar facilities in the su-biect planriing area ne. plan proposed a loop road that Nx-111 accordinL, to Ljje zt and Florida ff' access Lro- tht _mLi-nokalee. I gional, Aiq, Tradenort areas to SR 82 and SR 29. both of which are regional roadways, Council stmt opos,--d' ira� SPortation systern �j ent- bt i have sev� iee'--, --vith tit,- Countv'-z t'�r -fjnr -%iPm --0 � - i ' J, 1-0 - -.-! I ; - -;' concerns how these- facilities w1ii he fiundea. The proposed amendments will improve and Marge the im !-nokaiee Regional Airpc'nnt. Council staff agrees and supponis the Coutity's effi-orts to improve 1�ts regiotia, faciiii- a!-'A beli-yes ihat 's an o—. j. ul .1 ?:x - - I I I I 'M.j- ;Iity that will aid fiaura economic development in the region The proposed charges do address the inienrnodai facifliti-es in the Inumokale- area an h- fi ltwre -,va.11"inct f-'•?i h: y - ling -he sub, -'jc� sys in the. area. 'I ject -Plan will provide improvements through toe use t dev-i-n—nt principals L ��5 'Tw-lrt .- '. am" Ca)Trm1aLJ -icd a-rees a -nd sum, 'is the -improvements the Plan makes related to inteTmodai development in firnmokalee. i 6C, prOno-st-id amendrnems dol not substa t•a-i aviireSS pj "!;c tr -c%ic.,ter. .:aYlAsnortation. _S o. sper-di rail facilities. :-,-.Pcv PrIV curnrn;' -wifi- cmnv.-.--'Txc- -I st-ratep,jes incit-wing, 6*xt not Pimiten to3 Fne on anct ovskiligoiwny ov- h1ir- 'r-u- - J C P - 2 . dots ri-P mitigation strategies, availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hu.".r canc e Cot -.!-e lirnes� or hatzand rn ligation. A; "of' 11 inty's -xisting 'GrOals, Obj i Poitcles that relate to these items arc s!"I'l in effect in the subjcci planning area. Because the plar's nesS' h n an n- vered's rlec- uct I on in dwelfin gy 1 Arn tv. =,' -2 1;. 1 iFi;j r d m kncp? i oil. andi densities of future developm, ent in the planning area., The issues related To hurricane sheitcr ,pace anti crop - =m=e Time- shou101. b-P impro• - d over rsrne --U- to The, [mMOk8le(, COMMUniTY. I �)f On-, tirfect;s h- Council staff h?s reviewed the proposed Pian anti believe Thai it will not have substa-miall extra-itirisdictional impacts on surrounding Counties oT Cin". The Plan -wifi im-Drove the Immokalee area and will provide an improved development model for that part of Collier County. Council staff supports the chan es ro os the County in the subject Plan and believes that it will benefit the region. Council staff does have concerns a o ` oft e c anges proposed in the plan with respect to infrastructure costs that will be cessary to support the new development pattern. The Plan suggests that the l;::uri ounty ;ommissions have a yearly review of the proposed projects that wi irnpie, ierit tie a _w TH9t•G gi «r,tn��'= �:c¢�• y�>'ii4t3�iu c�...fis i:n"1..�1�.:ui. y' feast° Ie_ f o'.:n,^0 staff vwiiews 3:uL ME Yian needs to be more sneci`ti'c as to how future fun "rig wil'i be achieved and hat 7e T�rIOTY }Ya. -:ae Y_AY ri T i-r ^S iBeYt C++Try•• ?:H !?T ifrt '3 .:_ *'S= _FtG+^1n 1C _ i•=3 _-, [_.i itlii C.i1 F T7 TjntiG .til P_. Y'}r1(i�'ii ,.d arnendr-11 -i(T is T�.(Fi7�CSr?_3 jf} a ji�i'v,' for TIiF, jii "e_u rp. ,e n tc "7, s Sign 1T1[-.ai]T._ P"iait.7rP rr Csi 3_rces. r {i_ {-way Ci?5iP_. CIE P_.f_�ni'1'� ?i:i; rnt�i aj Y"ion i sTi e to fij/ei'ii F.fiiC _7i ti tY t rric w n±�nn iinls vier. .�. r 3 ?�7 tLl Attachment III Maps Collier County ACA IORAEC -1 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments Site Locations LU 0 z m 0 P m w of W w wl L( 0 LL W fu Ir 5 90 L r7 1 FIB I Vim e' i� o ii! 1iF iii c 13 tit I Vim 5 Lb 1 LU uj LUII IL < LL M U) CL 12; CL a Immokalee CRA Master Plan Update and Related Services Summary of Incurred Costs for Consulting, Application fees & Advertising fees 9 :ontractor - RWA contract 08 -5073 escription Total Amour Task 1— IAMP Adoption - $75,050.00 Task 2 — LDC Adoption — 140,600.00 Task 3 — Transportation Plan - $128,725 — Subcontractor — Tindale Oliver Task 4 — Capital Improvement Plan - $41,800.00 Subtotal Contract -June 24, 2008 Change Order #1 & 2 —Add Public Realm Pian/Town Design to the Scope - Subcontractor -Land Design Inovations- $165,500+ $22,000 = 187,500 Contract Modification #3 — Change Payment Schedule- $0 Contract Modification #4 — Additional Sufficiency reviews added by CDES - $50,000 Change Order # 6 —Add Operational Plan to Scope of Services - $4,605.00 Change Order # 7 — Increase length of contract for 6 months - $75,000 Subtotal Change Orders Total Contract Contractor - RMPK Description Master Plan Tasks 2006 Master Plan Tasks 2007 Total Contract Contractor - Application & Advertising F Description Application Advertising Total Paid Grand Total Consulting and Application /Advertising Costs �f /J,VV 140,600 128,725 41,800 386,175 187,500 50,000 4,605 75,000 317,105 703,280 81,560 50,760 132,320 10,123 26,823 862,423 w I RWA, Inc. Immokalee Area Master Plan Support PO 4500134877 Invoice Invoice Date Number Work Period 9/6/12:blb Invoice Amount Billed by Date Check Amount Mulhere & Assoc. Paid Number 4/12/2012 0031670 3/4/12 to 3/31/12 3,537.50 650.00 5/16/2012 872011 5/15/2012 0031747 4/1/12 to 5/5/12 1,875.00 390.00 6/27/2012 874115 6/15/2012 0031865 5/6/12 to 6/2/12 3,267.50 1,300.00 7/18/2012 875043 7/11/2012 0031918 6/3/12 to 6/30/12 1,690.00 1,170.00 8/15/2012 876283 3/23/2012 0031606 2/23/2012 to 3/3/12 1,855.00 975.00 9/5/2012 877136 Total Paid to Date 12,225.00 4,485.00 Balance Remaining to be Invoiced 3,555.00 A- — � 7— + qA 541t -9 ►� �rr� -� �� k-L I\n.e SAcALj jo1`b� �irbCeSS USA -el o, A*,-, (ivy )s 2� �t Lo AS ��AWeS ti.. 4L,-)o Su�AAn4lu� MMS, First A \A eQD �\{ W \r�t- UJ A ou-eJ ! �� o cooc� ct.Ii,.XvA1se"e,+ k-uk S U o tJ O ,A l IS �bS��r� ItrQ 4-> J "t Ind ti _ S0(0,14 ) q LS i� Ca � � se�enS t� @ �,,A,, a �- (� \,nom• v�,�,�..5��••e..,�" SP� ^�x�� '� C�A��.r ll��. � 1��"�, '�a�tU0. � fi�J, V"►od"e SeQC41CALI 1 Sc L 3,3 (8q tbvlie) �l tt 4-� C � t,� C Ar � t3, O�l'Q C' � v✓� e.r'� D� S� �� 6 w � + n N r..e ) /G+i C/�'�l �c9 \ J J 1 �,Mv ' a'1' o scjj j ed- cX� a B s o �oS �+n9t �O T� -�A >ft � A,,S lS�C l� �►� tyre rC c4 (4 . of Qct a S o f% % VN) $ er� ,, � t tti + � � �Osvlir tPJ Q �f 4 Z-A I �. Q8npn� G- At�tc%) pw�-) s� bye�.l il.�y Ol. �jv►l��j �./�� J� Q \ J A4-�CA A �,- � C lol cs A r a s j Q�� t 0C) , Y` DfflO -er ! k� Vn n lX l , ?oS, t ftsCvr4+ tt's � I � 0,� hluerj&� i4r�Jrlk *- wWo%,�Je CLA q � I tj - 0 -, A� � t ) erf At I O� co \V\ A, ,,,k J�c S 1� �,� �`l p�� t �`b (� ' 1 o J -Phc Cv • n ff4x t p '9A p, -�� (,rt. uCt C�Q U I ov ) �J-bcejup,41 J�jt orocesf i ssue s Ass d< <A-W w (A —f Le- Z A V, re e., a ,J a S ck- yes 0 C+ , p�� r �� L �A 711%-o_ �e C4 cue � P,4 CCSs (e Cf"&C -f � e, r I r, rt (., I �� -�° use S k4p j vc; iI ^j �FIDCeS) otj �..CJQ H 2 � T UGC ,, —�e tegtj,eJ ck 0�4jrL (.aq ft n ,A) j s I} v1 w� l l a4 -4 4 t X-P CQ�- .,e 1A f-w- V.,� ^t-1 S C h ev ^ ,*— l 1 /^ C l ija 1 CO CA %I OC, A L,_, 84 +Lee ejq6joJ C �_,vej -, I SV P / n anml^i'c�j% -%r, cA C) (Z rA 4l-,%�j C%J /J l e or c--. s4.c -4 l"f nST oL C Cam, CC �ND4- tto J. 4 aj 01�� l� ro a,_% Or9C r—:�T r V,�+v CS / J L L -� h{ b ra � { w a 1�ir a •,,� w4,(s '-, u v I V 1 � �c-. l r. f .U�,,,�a,,'� a\ .� V Z{' t ►� ill w V�- � f`,o ,per" t2 U t e w i P Oc,% 'I" P~ 2 ) a— �.A 44 1 ,,ioetl1 -o A M •J"k r r'{a, . -lo W .J CT wq % r� ^F i rI -It iQ I'al". -Cc 0-f- m C, If e Co 1 \,\ 1 , l ,� " �:-(S(,< < uj ©perr,f«...*, ( (am, I M —+f ` `, ''II --II l�pp re<�,,,,,Jo•iiz.,) o-' � Lt C(1�A- re9Aji -.G C��kGtl 6rofQC-ff� Sj- -I�e) s11ootl --r't rl+ � ,,vr4 c>+ 44 A,.✓tivA -( p ro C � � � - ' Sc�r� Ac ,. •�� 5cn l a --�-t ..,.. y CA?AL. (At / \onsr J -qk+ i 9,\icl 11 C .77,. - 0 �, r C 441-,, 1 c�v re .7� lq 4' /la �� ' ('1 a� C fl I / �'+ a C t+ .. � m a cwt � 1a'r► rt v�e.4 LAI Such dt 1 � S 4,, �C C 0 rJ'(, r1 jf� f , P 4CC u,- f �c Qo C Q J I e J 0,�r I 'c aL L%.11I r/ r-e cam„ c.,-e .I,f Q 3(1 otj exh cc P � , S 20( CL I f 4 j) L. , U C d ---e e _,�, e \4U e, co G 4 &L c4 4- , .,� o f �� wl hl / Zc� / Z 1 vLp e+l,7 J n (c -ac 1 Pc> w MA,..if�►�� 4 ,-e-IfoH�t / / /,-,// LVcI..l �e wIp 04�oe (&,,.PuC Tl eue.. C&v, 4 vt.%�b jc,L,40L c► lyk o°► N A 11 J ! 1 L,,-71j 1v L-i &� —�° 3,j s-� :� k � L t) P o5Se��. C,>- -� Sc,ic \j cr(fQ� ate} r-ep% �4 V14 - et j�P V 1 � t eS t-eq v (J 1 4 c44 �a --•� ruve J D G L e) 1.. G l 04 rw, C- l r iv- 4D j j I„y 1; �. e-� 1, .1 6, (��, I5 ,4 114I.,/ two G , /e 14 o ,N,ej (" -/ , , .` --�I.c- a: f -.r, id I ¢ e U rC (Ares, {��e� -tte JA,c >M 6> < le (n fl e, --4t f l ► -'L -FGA 9 o r 7 4e �e�► le �aMeS uw&►- Sec-4I,\ Te c, --e pm v,c6c— (c ic..,� ' cue , L � ^-� sy �°^ de,' ' � c ob �, J �1 vt"JIV) ) 'o, pq ?A) 3V'J� �Sv t G (jLecreITje / r--cJ/ �/a U �. ,� See .. n�1 JJ c�� pe ,.� ► u I1, fie- ` - � , � c.,, - ff Z wow t � e I e-.ji ((JN01) /0 r 9NJ/ CIA,Ia - -�— 6r l -v-41/c CA fe r% , w,-�'� -fL -C- c it� , 10 C [ 4n�j -tutu J/ v-e C r in,- 1',.�J Lo., T , f,, fc ct, i c e t-ecj i i w 4,1," V% J tl-" Jo (-W- �,Je.,+ o, -�- 4Lc S k-As r 9 C 10 , S� c c P C M w4k r-e c .,> ,r.J a 4, —J -� re c,), +41; i w vl )1 u 13, HaJ f4 H-A rro -Ac4— &y,,,( �`n�'�7 Jl J dc--. 1*11 41c- 44 r faj eJ c-�.,,, y e / e —41.e � j o % -A4 T-9 "-� e 6 "n i e . y , c G,.r, eel `t. l d v1 l r c vO- C ^ r.�J 0 ( p_� /-' ff .4 Co q rT S,. T .fi t �C CP Jl ! o rPJ J-t -4 iJ AP— A J( Q J co �, r +•err l✓Y � � -� It �( (, � 14 S 4 © 2V2 A4i , 2J 1 20 12 c, -It-liv-C,- , Soo V% r l- +s t,4L, o, rec eJIJt y de c 11 r •e I a I rl (- U l T u''rc. t , J. L" M 0 � % { -e e of wj 'T X ZS � �f v�— rej l A Rwb -� V-• mow....,, o % � tee w ��i�� -✓ \ � pP � o {.�... -4 , n CJ //f Caw � � � ifs` y � +q. , 4 r er /-, n^ •e..,, r J a 7 i � -. i 4. Co l I/ -e-r R- (•. c rc u3 e p,f W � f c r„-, n ,.-�4- rt 11 J�.7 -i [ l er -i ' -- Zc-> �t o { Pl c /} K4. /cC . q -„� of arc-, --(tiy P Q) /'J i) , , �c & i -P %./ 4 1�' eert? ('I & � J l 1l oug-r "l `'l Er►� � I� 41n.� l� U .� �fi }� ^�' � mac/ �+-� In S�O ti./ 40 Y I-e u I �---j J, —4- (,,4 Prlojp kJ �„�-f�• s�-� -e ��'� �►n�c S�PC ►T,< ��aK,l.o�ie �v'�'�vvl C�.��v,�.p �� (v- Pr c d p �A�, �r a If/ I --WC 4— 4 X64 00 h h'-. ' -k..Q G ke e/ jo 'n'w- i44J �� 1e�ul1J - 2�QP('IPnCP GI� l��pw�t�j► -,I. RU1 -pw Q G1 ^ t j ZL �_ C S 1� ^► l ii{ fit+ �1 & I(" (� /4- CA --- f L-e.e b a J S - r-e so j,re tj c. 4,.�-n7 j I., oec� ,e4 ,4,-.,r, 3-,4,., -,mil 2,W01 c Ib 3 e 0,41... � � n-• c� r.. S'I u-ee '1 u oc CJ r- u t -e) 3 Z °� ®3 1 CA, na� C� i�-Ccum K �� 4 Lt.-A er,�, �, �, �.. f' �'/� (di p m o.•J cy I e^_' ,,a 4 Ca nog n A n 3 r m mn M 0 z m a r m r m O m a N z 2 m w a X O 3 V X X O m C W m Ai m N Z G) 2 m X v O c X m r N m v 0 2 X m .. w 0 ,-n O 3 � � rn OT0 rn 0 �rn� z0 m >> ~z i G) D mzn m �zz _ o r N =W °o m Lw C) rnzw 7m G) D T D Cn O <z =�0 co (no � z -< 0QO moo ~ z rn,z n D -� N 0 DOS 3-�6 c3z rn m � C N O C O N mol 0Dm U �O 0zm m cn 3 rn D r- ' � r 0 000 3 n Oc~n C � z I c�OD 'a m O 0 S z a 3 m m z r� m N z a m m a m H Z n r m w rr .n (D M n m n 3 M r m v m X 0 Z m a W r m r m In m v N Z 2 m W a v O 3 M X N X O 2 m N C W m 05 m N Z m X v c X m r N m v O 2 X m w 3 Z C m GA m X 0 c A 3 m z z v X O v v X Z 2 m A 2 N 3D0 oT0 0 m m z �m z0 m rn D ~z D �zn m �Dz O =rN r C) rn�W C) ~ cn mzw �G) D T.DU-) O <z 2 0 ou U)o xz� 0(-)o moo ~z rn,z 03 03 rn C7 >Zo moo° o Z c3z rnrn0 m N O 00 N 00rn 0 rn �O 0zrn v G) U) D 3m> z0D >� DO OW O zU') I .a U2 T rt Z 3 rn -r J v X O ri m Z a m r rn m N z G) v m A fD 3 cD m k. fD m c .a (D n ru _� O 0 M W c CL ce cD rt m r m n m H Z n r m rm a U2 m CL a) (D ADO rr U) 70 M 4TH O O rM U) M z rnD� ~ ~z D I G)z z m �zZ 0 -i O o =coo rnS<qW n,ul rnzW V) D 0�3 �<z z o 01-1 O �z� ono �o� 2 '-' z D M z co 00 rn XZo rj �0� 3�6 Z3> D M Ln M N O O O N D Mo- O. rn X M O U)�" � ozrn -M G) 3rn> z0> -� > r �O 000 n n� OjAz I a m 3 z m � m U3 3 0 0 m v X m c� O '� r Z t1 Z m N Z v m 1 i r- [J n cD 3 m .a (D u rD _ -s Q. C- 0 O �o a rt ma m a m m X H Z n r m a X rm w< un m C. fu r+ Ici- v OI V, C X N m v O 2 X m O-. w w Z C m m X 0 c n 3 m Z Z v X m O a °v X m Z 2 m n N 3D0 3 � � L ` ;a OTO z0c M rn z vz� M D z �G) z z rM D z = r N =W °o co w n cn rnzw G7 D Ln 0�3 r n z 2 0 03 Lo Ol >z� n O �o� rn,z co 0 C M D No O � 3�6 r c3z rnM m N O z -I C) �0 D Mo- O70rn 70 M �O U)�� oZM mG)� 3rn> Z D r- X r 0133 -n 10 O z c�OD 'a cD ul V f+ fD O s �D Z 3 m v X m a m Z a m r m 3 m mi N Z v m \_ n n m 3 cD rt un �i V n of O O .Q ao CL U2 rt m m ma H Z n r m X u im U3 m C. f+ m t:: V r- o M > =o x a cai 3 V ��'n �o z a m ..� � !- m m m z m 3 r 0 3 m m �\ c� m Z -I 3 C O T O rt O C V' n v Z .., rn a M ;u �a m v° m 3 a zz 0 = v 177 M m �' T� 3 -� r- rn rn m '� rn rn m 3 m N GZi 0 rt w V 1 —I P z v rn >;u !�: r1'1 v '" G) O In m c' -'nzz m G G)�� 3 v m G D O O �zrrn 3 -I ~z Z -� ADZ S' �H O O zm z zoo � r��Z � i �zo m m = O o rn m = r' N w .� w m c -I D c 4 2 y V) 177 -n m z n O -i ,�< z r -I 0 mm r m I 2a v -c z 1-4 CU v u m o b a C pp 0 v OS xz -c G `/ p n A --q m i^ .� U) C D C� Z 3 = G) n �' � Z O --qi g z (n n n ID 0 ti �ZC:) ^v m oo -Z-I D�irrni 3 a a po-i, �-, = �p o cn �zo O � -i3z �� M a c3D Ln O , � CL CL 3 Lnn�N° j m rn�o z 0) D Ln0N fD `fl O z0 � � rt � � z�° � nY a po" p N a a ooh► � rt M 0 X v m > O U) o rn� ,� i m 0 ;0 m to (!) c Vf rn �O m z 0 zg '7` C O �� r- rnG�cn n n Z pzrn �` cD m m v = -�IrnD n X22 s c' A A z 0 ` C �` n m m W "v D IV OD z r A O Z 7D O� O i N pp Z v rt, m 3DO z a 3 r- a m m � a A -< 3�rn m Z ED m O C O T Op a A O C a z m y m 3 a 4 r• ; ' zm •v '� m Vi -4 r 0 3 mD° r, m v 3 z ,l 3 C Z O z m O O m m -I p o �-- I m m a ° rn�w m W � r w W u mG) D n rn m 3 -C-1 023 > rn Z m <rn -m •I -Ci o G m o 0 m Imn m X OW , ° a _ v o > Z� v° u o O � A -Dio_o m > C O n Z �• Z O -I 3 rn,z n 3 = m co ao r) = 3 ao q °-ciN 3 (Q "' z O a a o o° (D �% o X o 3�_° � � z O a c-13z X a O m ern° m S ;: Z O m 3 -1 D ° o V O z -I V X° n0x G 1 t o v° --i m 0;0 rn S cA -p•I m m Z Mzrn (A r. v cn rn Z C > _ --q L ran C ao --I La m 3orno -Di rn 0 > M m ,., O �' a [� Orn� V N (� Z m Oc Ln W ao a z a ,- m X � Q � � '' r) (f) O D O a m 3 n 3 m m z H LO 110 70 ID Z O6n0 a G rn rn mr7m„z (1) m V m �G) O a -~i m c~nzD � m -I c) z �zm H �zz =W0° rn�w r �F-I w mG)D 7C a 0 M < � m Corn ol ° a u >z� °v ° � X �m .� --I z Z ' A M, z �. 0o ao m (� ' DAN cD U2 �zC) (D 3�6 c3D O\ C. gym° D °o :7 �� H 0 °Ov fD 7o D .p n°°� °zm (DD M Ln 0 0. -�ImD 3 03 I Z O O -� x r ° O O 0 � ,� W cz a rt V n m A 3 V r- m m v O z m a GO r m r- m In m H z m W a v 0 3 V O X O 2 m C V m m Z a v c m r m v O m m W z C m rn c A 3 m m z a m O v v X m z 2 m n N 0 =0 z D r z�m o no rn ;z corn rn z �G) 0 0 �z ° z m _G) z �zm D z -0 = M o° m cu w r--zw rn - D 00�z --qNz �mm 0 >z -< 0P0 moo =zD rn,z O C rn D --I N 3 A '6 C 3 > D LO M � N z -► o o V rn D OOrn L �O � H ~ M G) Ln X__ z m -Di 7AXrrr-- r �0 Oco O� z� 4 r, z h a G) m M a z G) 'r' r m v 7°0 m N m m H �Z n r m a r n m 3 U3 ID t0 fD tQ _ �i V I_n 0 O UD'C a r+ 0 =0 3 � n 23 O (-- rn Ln m z0 m D G) G z z ;u �zz 0 =rN =°CU o mDoW n LrI m DV) O�z j <z m 0 cp �o z oC)O rn,z (m crn D --I N 0 X0° zoo Ln D z Ln M 0 N O z -I o oo, V 70 D MO- O�rn v ,O �zm 3rn> z0D -{D� � r 0 O O co O z V rD ul rt G) 3 m m z �1 a rn r r m m Z O v m M try N a s v V v m n t m m H Z n r m a X rm u 1 � S m n � r 0 1- s O a U O t d N fD to 1 � S m n � r 0 1- s O a ncnn ncnn 3P ° fD n cDi 3 0 =p a � 3 0 2 D � C �rnn D In r. 00 r, ;a rn ;,c v rn D z0c "� v m -mj m �m G m 1 m mrnz 3 -D•I O rnD� = m i 3 >� '* S7-4 rn v -cnizD � m W m ""'-'z 5 m 3 rn�z -� v m z o O mzrn X -� rn'-'n -I = �zpz ' '� *zz ~ m m of ~ x = -< o , Z m -q O o � � m r' ry ...� W w rnWw mWo a. n -< u, l J W r l 1 m 3 rnzw �.. ��w D <m In m 0 TI 3: (A �z 2 O M m p -I p m 00 v �z-< v 71 � o "W D N A -100 m Vf DCX m _ Z 3 = z D (6 A Z = 3 rn�z n• -I 3 rn,z �• m m o0 M n rp = n c� Z pCrn I rn m coma O can �zo m w >�o D D 0 p -�, O cn Z 3-16 �• (� D D 00-- Z�r,LA .� p Z 3rd-° �• O ran m 0 O D �3z M C Doo " 3 8 "'o� N D 0O� M ~ z-Io .. rF v moo- NJ m = rt C D 0�� `° m v rn m v � O ce � rn �p -1 m O� rn 2 O cn Gn y� O cn 0 cn m Z rn 0z ,M m �'F = O ozrn c�c of v G) V) n m Z rn G) (n m m 3co W = -Im> A > m D `� m m 3°0 -I m a o r' ono = - X '- o - o � � X °� n -c mc N 0 V4 00 = o U) W CL a z c to M cD rt rt T nwn w Z a 3 ncnn 3D r- -p m m ^ ODrO m 3�rr -rn c�D m Z � m 3rr-rn O O �mn a � A O cv'n00X C - n �; pq O �-+ rn n V p z °� m a a 000° m m (nm 3 m m m �rn -1 r z cD -I �/ cn rn M 3 M rt rn v 3 ��0 O m �Az 0 D° C �G)z cD m 0 v -"'iZD Z �Drn _ ' ~ O O �zm m m -i0o %mil m m = _°°° m =moo a w m 03 `�`' n,� n .. m oo w -< ' Lri m 3 rrT1z�`' W .. r,,w SAD rn m 3 rn�' r Z �D� Z VDU) 171 <m ZI -1 0 3 O v m tm o =�<-� z m r m C rn rn m 0� vi0 0�p x DO ;0 z °o O < N Dc rn ul A -q 0 C C: ;P0 O I-q . elm A °° rn,z --4 � z 3 =G)D = m n ( -.� 3 rn, z M Z porn 3 > m m co oom Q Vhf ��°N W -I D-Io X z 3 °0 ° a s °� O '-'rcn �� C �r-Ln O a �z x rn a o a �3z O m cnrnn, cD O m ern° 3 � y °o °o V a oo° a ooh CP pO 0 ;0m M X n m O rn � � G) U-) m Z M C) Lnn C fli r W = -I rn D Oo '� -�i m D M m 303 L '� = 3 03 -1 a �� D � 7C Ai A Z> W -� r O W a D r m m 0 000 GZj n 0 Z TOW n = O cn W a zv' a m Ccn a v � � o � n 1 �D 3 D C i l e_ ANO im- M-RSM, (NI f O U) S O .a 00 c CL rt UD �D CL a) f"F �D I. a 0 m n m 3 m pa Z v �� P� = X m 0 rn Ma w I � � n � n 1 �D 3 D C i l e_ ANO im- M-RSM, (NI f O U) S O .a 00 c CL rt UD �D CL a) f"F �D I. T n A n 3 V r 4 m v In X 3 3 m a r m r M O -I 2 m a z 2 m 00 a X O O 'G �° X O m C W m Q 00 m N z A 2 a v O c X m v O 2 X m W N z C M CR m X O c A 3 m z -1 z v X O a °v X 3 2 m A 2 N 70 3D0 3rr-IM c~n � � Ln oTo 0 rnmz L,)Z� mD° H ~z z SqG) z z M D =rNJ =03 °o W ��LT1 rnzw G7 � D 023 �<z = o 00 Lo >z� ono r- > C: z rn,z 0Cm Duo �zo 396 r N C3z M Cn M N O O � O N D 0Mo- n ��A ozrn a 3rnDI W Z D r ri 5r 0O Om n o z C � � � rn m z m n G) z m v 3 m o m O s cD v X m j F' 'a c� m ,rY D 0 0 'a C CL ma r m cn m H Z n r m X m< C. 0) r+ m m.. %9A