Agenda 12/14/2010 Item # 8E
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 1 of 60
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of
Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impaet Fee Ordinance) providing
for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the "Collier County Law
Enforcement Impact Fee Study Final Report" and amending the Law Enforcement Impact
Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Ten of Appendix A to allow for a phased
implementation of the rates.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopts the impact fee update
study entitled the "Collier County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Final Report" and accepts
the findings of the report which recommends changes to the Law Enforcement Impact Fee rate
sehedule, that provide for rate increases in the residential land use categories and a mixture of rate
increases and rate reductions in the commercial land use categories. The average percentage of
increase for residential land uses is 25%, and the average percentage of increase for commercial
land uses is 12%. However, staff recommends that the Board applies the changes through a
phased implementation, which in year one would provide a decrease in all land use eategories by
implementing 60% of the proposed schcdule. In year two, 80% of the rate schedule would be
implemented, and in year three, the full ratc schedule would be implemented, as described above.
CONSIDERATIONS: On May 23,2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006-25, providing
for the adoption of the 2006 "Collier County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Cost and Credit
Update."
On April 28, 2009, the Board adopted Ordinance 2009-17, implementing a revised indexing
methodology and thereby establishing the current Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates.
Tbe requirement for the update of impact fees "at least every three years': is set forth by Section
74-502 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code). In keeping with the formal
update requirement, the County retained Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc. (the Consultant) to
complete the Law Enforcement Update Study. The attached report describes the technical and
legal framework and the methodology used to complete the rcport. Additionally, the update study
has been reviewed by the County's outside legal counsel, Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A.
The following is a brief overview of the major study components.
The update utilized the same approach and methodology used in the original 2005 study that was
updated in the 2006 cost and credit update. The major study components are:
. Capital Asset Inventory (buildings and equipment)
. Population
. Level of Service
. Cost Component
. Credit Component
. Calculated Fee Schedule
Agenda Item No. SE
December 14,2010
Page 2 of 60
Based on the findings of the update study, the residential Law Enforcement Impaet Fee rates are
increasing on average 25%, while the commercial and non-residential categories are increasing on
average, approximately 12'Yo. Thc averagc incrcase in the commercial category is moderated by
the 14 land uses that have a calculated decrease based on updated demand characteristics. The
increases that have been calculated in the majority of the land use categories are related to
increases in both equipment and building inventory (Special Operations Building). The changes to
these two components are the prcdominant reason for the fee increases, despite the fact that both
land and building construction costs have declined.
Due to the substantial increasc in the value of the equipmcnt inventory, for the purposes of this
update study the inventory included the f(lllowing: 1) the items that were purchased between the
completion of the 2005 Law Enforcemcnt Study, which implemented the fcc, and the 2006 Cost
and Credit Update. A Cost and Credit Update does not involve a review and additions/subtractions
to the inventory, it simply updates the cost and credit component used to develop the fee.
Thercfore, this is the first opportunity to capture the value of these inventory items purchased
during this time period. 2) ltcms purchased aftcr the 2006 Cost and Credit Update. This is the
standard procedure for an impact fee update and the first opportunity to capture the value of these
inventory items. The inventory does not include a re-valuing of the entire inventory to current
value. Typically, the equipment cost figures provided by the Collier, County Sheriffs Office
(CCSO) is based 011 historical purchase price. However, as updated infonnation becomes
available, the CCSO provides current values of certain inventory itet;ns. This trend will be
monitored fllr the next update study, scheduled for Calendar Y car 2013. 'If the total value of the
equipment/vehicle inventory continues as a large value component and the total value continues
the upward adjustment, it may be appropriate to capture the full value of the inventory in order to
represent the total cost of providing law enforcement services.
The Board has options related to the implementation ofthc updated fee.
I. Adopt the update study and a phased implementation of the rates. This option would
provide an immediate decrease (-25% residential and -33% commercial) in all land use
categories and slowly increase the fec to the rates proposed by the study. This option
addresses the immediate economic situation, by providing impact fee relief at a level
consistent with earlier adopted impact fce reductions, but also accounts for the
County's investment in law enforccment infrastructure by implcmenting the full,
proposed fee in the third year. The phased implementation would occur as follows:
December 20 10 - implement 60% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
December 2011 - implement 80% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
December 2012 - implement 100% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
Calendar Year 2013 -Impact Fce Update Study begins
Under this sccnario, impact fces would be generated at less than thc amount attributable
to the demands created by growth for the first two years of the phased implementation.
While this scenario has implications both for the repayment of debt as well as future
construction/acquisition of capital improvements, phasing is a method that is frequently
used throughout the State, related to impact fee incrcases and was used in Collier County
R)r the implementation of the General Government Buildings Impact Fee.
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 3 of 60
2. Adopt the update study and implement the fee as proposed. As described above, this
will cause the rates for the majority ofland uses to increase.
Staff recommends, Option 1, which provides for a three-year phase in of the proposed rates,
beginning with implementation of 600!., of thc proposed fee in December 2010 and thereby
providing an immediate rate reduction, followed by two subsequent years of phasing to reach the
full, proposed fees (100%).
The following is a chart providing the current fees as well as the phased implementation amounts
and the full proposed fee, for cOlmnon land uses:
Land Use Current Fee Phase I (2010) Phase II (2011) Phase III (2012)
60% of 80% of 100% of
Pro nosed Fee Pro nosed Fee ; Proposed Fee
Single -Family $358.67 $269.50 $359.33 $449.16
1,500 - 2,499 sq. per dwelling per dwelling unit per dwelling per dwelling
ft. unit unit unit
(livinl! area)
Office $228.25 $183.98 $245.30 $306.63
50,000 sq. ft. per pcr pcr pcr
or less 1,000 sq. 1'1. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq, ft.
Retail $574.23 $317.43 $423.24 $529.05
50,000 sq. 1'1. per per per per
or less 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
Church $92.38 $73.85 $98.4 7 $123.09
per per per per
1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 Sq. ft. 1,000 Sq. ft. 1,000 sa. ft.
General Light $112.3 I $89.40 $119.20 $149.00
Industrial per per per per
1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
The Law Enforcement Impact Fee update also included an additional task related to Level of
Service. Based on the recommendation given by the Planning Commission and direction provided
by the Board of County Commissioners during the 2009 Annual Update and Inventory Report
(AUIR), the consultant completcd a Level of Service review. The purpose of this review was to I)
determine if thc use of law cnforccment onicers per 1,000 population is an appropriate measure of
Level of Service; and 2) dctermine if any changes to the Law Enforcement Level of Service were
warranted. Based on the review of information on population, Level of Service, square footage of
law enforcement buildings provided, ctc., for fOUlieen (14) Florida counties, it was dctennined that
while none of the counties surveyed had an adopted Level of Service for Law Enforcement, many
of the countics used officers per population to gauge their perlormance in providing services.
Careful consideration was given to changing to a Level of Service based on building square
footage, however the conclusion from the Level of Servicc study as well as from practical use in
the AUIR, is that officers per 1,000 population is an appropriate mcasure.
,-'"
As discusscd during the adoption of the 2010 AUIR, held on November 10, 2010, staff has
proposed that the Level of Service for Law Enforcement Facilities continue to be measured as
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14,2010
Page 4 of 60
officers per 1,000 population. Further, that for the 201 I AUIR, the adopted Level of Service be
modified to 1.84 officers per 1,000 population in accordance with the findings of the Law
Enforcement Impact Fee Update Study, which is a slight reduction from the current standard of
1.96 officers per 1,000 population. Finally, for the purposes of the AUIR, the relationship between
the actual certified law enforcement officers and available building square footage will be used to
allocate space to officers. There are currently no projects planned in the five-year plan, however,
this issue will continue to be monitored annually by way of the AUIR.
In the future, based on population increases, which may dictate the requirement of additional law
enforcement officers, the need for additional law enforcement building square footage and the
associated cost can be calculated and used within the five-year planning window.
On September 15,2010, the Collier County Productivity Committee reviewed the "Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study" and associated impact fee rate changes. The Committee
recommended that the Board accept the findings of the study and associatcd impact fee rates and
implement the study as proposed.
The "Collicr County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study" and associated impact fee rate changes
were presented to the Dcvelopmcnt Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on November 3,2010
and Deeember I, 2010.
The DSAC recommended that the Board accept the study and implement the new rates in three
phases, as recommended by staff. Additionally, the DSAC recommended that during the next
required update of the Law Enforcement Impact Fee and Govemment Buildings Impact Fee that
the land and building inventories be reviewed and that the Board consider removing from the
inventory, all or a portion of, the value of those specialized buildings that are not likely to be
reproduced (i.e. Sheriff's Special Operations, the Emergency Opcrations Center) as well as the
value ofland that will likely not be required to be purchased again in the future.
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue projections related to the individual impact fees depend heavily on
the pcrmitting trends during the corresponding time period. Changes in pennitting activity will
directly affect this impact fce revcnue strcam. If the Board elects to direct that the Law
Enforcement Impact Fce rates bc phased in, the first Phase, constituting a rate decrease will go into
effect on Deccmbcr 20, 2010; therefore, any permits applied for on or after that date will receive
the lower rates. The statutory minimum 90-day notice is not required f(lr impact fee reductions.
The subsequent changes would then becomc cffective automatically on December 20, 20 II and
December 20,2012.
Because of the deeline in construction actIVity, impact fee revenue has also been significantly
reduced. Based upon actual impact fee collcctions and current pennitting activity and forecasts,
the following is the projected change in impact fee revenuc associated to the updated rates, based
on implemcntation of 60% of the proposed ratc, assuming that dcvelopment activity remains
constant.
Impact Fee Potential Change in Annual Collections
Based on Current Activity
First Year (Ii) 60% of Proposed Fee
Law Enforcement ($88,300)
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 5 of 60
Any further deeline in activity will also directly affect the impact fees collections. Because of the
economic conditions and instability in pelmitting activity, the potential changes in annual
collections related to the second and third ycar of the phased implementation can not be projected
with accuracy; howevcr, if activity rcmains constant and similar to current permitting activity
levels, the revenue loss in the sccond year should be minimal with a move to positive collections
when the full fec is implemented.
Downward adjustments to impact fees directly impact the specified Fund's ability to pay debt
service payments. Howcver, ncw development can not be chargcd in excess of the cost
attributablc to thc demand being crcatcd. In many of thc rcccntly adopted impact fee reductions,
deelining costs havc bccn thc primary factors in driving the reductions. In the case of the Law
Enforcement Impact Fee, the update study proposes increases to the majority of land use
categories. Use of the phased implemcntation allows for an immediate reduction in rates, similar
to dccTeases adoptcd in other impact fce categorics, but thcn slowly brings the impact fee Tates to
the full, calculated fee. Thcreforc, thc loss of revenue relatcd to a targeted reduction in fees occurs
over a relatively short time pcriod.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP ACT: The impact fee update requirements are consistent with
Objective 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP), which states: "Future development will bear a proportionate cost of
facility improvements neeessitated by growth."
Additionally, this approach is consistcnt with Scction 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the
Florida Impact Fee Act 2006, requiring the most reccnt and localized data be used in impact fee
calculations.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is legally sufficient for Board action. - JAK
RECOMMENDATION: That thc Board of County Commissioners adopts an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collicr County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for the incorporation by reference ofthe impact fee
studies entitled the "Collier County Law Enforcemcnt Impact Fce Study Final Report" and
amending the Law Enforcemcnt Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedulc Ten of Appendix A,
to provide for the phased implementation of thc proposed ratcs, with Phase I, constituting 60% of
the proposed rates, which provides f(lr a decrcasc in fces, becoming clIective on December 20,
2010; Phase II, constituting 80% of the proposed ratcs bccoming effcctive on December 20,201 I;
and Phase III constituting 100% of the proposed rates becoming effective on December 20,2012.
Prepared by: Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager
Growth Managemcnt Division - Planning and Regulation
Attachments: 1) Proposcd Ordinance; 2) Law Enforcemcnt Study: 3) Proposcd Ratcs - Phased
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 6 of 60
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BE
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of
Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for
the incorporation by reference of the impact fee studies entitled the Collier County Law
Enforcement Impact Fee Study Final Report and amending the Law Enforcement Impact Fee
rate schedule, which is Schedule Ten of Appendix A to allow for a phased implementation of
the rates.
12/141201090000 AM
Prepared By
Amy Patterson
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Manager - Impact Fees & EDe
Date
Business Management & Budget Office
12/3/20101:52:02 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Date
12/3/20103:45 PM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Transportation Division
Director ~ Transportation Planning
Date
Transportation Planning
12/3/20105:15 PM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
Approved By
12/6/20109:58 AM
Norm E, Feder, AICP
Transportation Division
Administrator - Transportation
Date
Transportation Administration
12/6/201010:04 AM
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Date
Office of Management & Budget
12/6/201012:29 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Office of Management &
Budget
ManagemenUBudget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management & Budget
12/6/20101:03 PM
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 7 of 60
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY CODE 0.1<' LAWS AND ORDINANCES (THE
COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE) BY
INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THE "COLLIER COUNTY LAW
ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT" AMENDING
THE LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE, WHICH
IS SCHEDULE TEN OF APPENDIX A, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FINDINGS OF THE UPDATE STUDY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT
AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE
COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of neccssary
capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by groW1h in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for groW1h-related
capital improvements for various facilities since 1978; and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2001-13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Codc of Laws and Ordinances (Code); and
WHERAS, on May 23, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
No. 2006-25, providing for the adoption of the 2006 "Collier County Law Enforcement Impact
Fee Study Cost and Credit Update"; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
No. 2009- I 7, amending the Code by implementing a revised indexing methodology and thereby
establishing the current Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates; and
WHEREAS, Section 74-502 of the Code provides that impact fee studies should be
reviewed at least every three years; and
WHEREAS, Collier County retained Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc., to complete the
update studies; and
Underlined lext is added; Strl:J6!; llu8ligft text is deleted
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 8 of 60
WHEREAS, Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc., has the impact fee study entitled the
"Collier County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Final Report," dated November 12, 2010,
and;
WHEREAS, the "Collier County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Final Report"
recommends changes to the Law Enforcement Impact Fee rate schedule, that provide for rate
increase in the residential land use categories and a mixture of rate increase and rate reductions
in the commercial land use categories; and
WHEREAS, the average percentage of increase for residential land uses is 25% and the
average percentage of increase for commercial land uses is 12%; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates equitably
distribute the costs of acquiring public facilities based upon a rational nexus relating costs
incurred by fee payers to infrastructure impacts created by residential and non-residential land
uses; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and findings and concurs
with the results of the calculations and the study; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopts this
Ordinance to implement the recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180 I, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act,
requires that the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee calculations and these
studies comply with that requirement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE. Artiele I, General, Section 74-106, Adoption of impact fee studies, of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74-106. Adoption of impact fee studies. ..
The board hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the foll6wing studies with regard
to the respective public facilities:
Underlined text is added; StRlIlI~ tRrsugh text is deleted
Page 2 of6
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 9 of 60
***
(10) Law enforcement facilities: "Collier County Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Final Report," dated Septemeer 15, 2005, prepared by Tindale-Oliver and Associates,
Inc.; as supplemeated ey tile "Collier COlHlt)' La..... Eaforeemeflt Impaet Fee StHd)'
Cost aAd Credit Update," dated May 5, 2006, prepared BY Tindale Oli'ler and
f.ssoeiates, lac. <November 12.2010); and
***
SECTION TWO. Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinanccs is hereby amended as set forth in the attachment to this Ordinance.
SECTION THREE. CONI<'LICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions.
SECTION FOUR. INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-
lettered and internal cross-references amendcd throughout to accomplish such, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FIVE. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The effective date of this Ordinance shall be delayed to March 14, 2011, in accordance
with the notice requirements of Section 163.3180 I, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact
Fee Act.
Underlined text is added; Struele tRrsHg'" text is deleted
Page 3 of6
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 10 of 60
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this _ day of , 20 I 0,
ATTEST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form
and ega fficiency:
Jeffr Kia zkow
Cou tomey
Underlined text is added; Struele thrsl:lgh text is deleted
Page 4 of6
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 11 of60
LA W ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE TEN
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Residential
Assisted Livim! Facilitv
Mobile Home
Multi-Family
Single Family
Less than 1,500 sq. H.
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft
2,500 sq. ll. or larger
Non-Residential
Auto Sales (Luxurv)
Auto Sales (New/Used)
Dank/Savings: Drive-In
Bank/Savings: Walk-In
Business Park
Car Wash - Aulomaleg
Car Wash - Self-Service
Church
Callege JtHlier'CamFflI:lHit)'
Callege LTHi..er~jt)
CollegelUnivcrsitv
7 500 students or fewer
GrenIer than 7 500 students
Convenience Store (24 hours)
Convenience Store with Gas pumps
Day Care
Furniture Store
Gasoline/Service Slation
Golf Course
Home Improvement Store
Hospital
Hote! IMffiel.
Effective July 27, 2009 March 14,2011
Rate
$192.19 per Dwelline: Unit
~ $319.59 Per Dwelling Unit/Site
~ $241. 85 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $412.45 Per Dwelling Unit
~7 $449.16 Per Dwelling Unit
:>3~ $496.66 Per Dwelling Unit
$239.69 Per 1 000 sa. ft.
~ $369.2Q Per 1,000 sq. ft.
:>3~ $492.34 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
$J'}8,,'l 155497 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
U4-Hl'l $2lJ78 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
$347.66 Per 1.000 sa. ft.
.:>3~ lliL.ll Per Service Bay
~ $12309 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
~~ Per St~ll:l.eAt
~>+% Per StHdeFlt
$21.59 per Student
$15.12 Per Student
W4M $1 181.19 Per 1.000 sq. ft.
u,~ $939.34 Per Fuel Position
$9,% $10.80 Per Student
$slJU Per I 000 so. n.
~ $427.5(, Per Fuel Position
$3,811.33 $4.197.87 Pcr 18 Holes
W+.M $384.37 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
.:>36il,49 $334.71 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $15980 Per Room
Underlined tcxt is added; .st~IOUgh text is deleted
Page 5 of6
Agenda Item No BE
December 14, 2010
Page 12 of 60
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Industrial - General Light WHl $149.00 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Marina ~ HLQ>. Per Berth
Mini-Warehouse W.48 illJ1 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel $149.tlQ Per Room
Movie Theater ~ $1291.32 Per Screen
Nursing Home ~ $155.48 Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less ~ $306.63 Per 1.000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001-100,000 sq. ft. ~ $261.<2 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,1101-200,000 sq. ft. ~ $22242 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001-400,000 sq ft ~ lli\L0.l Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft. ~ $172.75 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical ~ $371.42 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
PharmacylDrug Store WM; $416.76 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube ~ $250.49 Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food wIDrive-In $2, 007 .ll $1.945.62 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant -High Turnover !J+~ ill. 30 Pcr I, 999 sEI. fl. Seat
Restaurant - Quality $1.119.18 $47.51 Per 1,9(}9 sEI. ft. Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less W44J $529.05 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001-100,000 Sq. Ft. ~ llilli Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001-150,000 Sq. Ft. ~ $485.87 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001-200,000 Sq. Ft. ~ $59384 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001-400,000 Sq. Ft. ~ $505.30 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001-6011,000 Sq. Ft. W!+.M $526.89 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001-1,000,000 Sq. Ft. $49M{J $522.57 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail > 1 ,000,000 Sq. Ft. ~ $451.J.l Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty l>J~ $36494 Per 1.000 sq. ft.
RV Park $116.61 PerSi~
School- Elementary (Private) ~ $12.96 Per Student
School- Middle (private) ~ lliIl Per Student
Scnool - High School (private) ~ $17.28 Per Student
Supermarket W-H+ $442.68 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store ~ $289.36 Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; StRlel( threHgh text is deleted
Page 6 of6
COLLIER COUNTY
LA W ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY
FINAL REPORT
Prepared By:
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Tampa, Florida
November 12,2010
07:1061-(l2.]()
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 13 of 60
_ rn Tind"Ie-OlivCf & Associ"lcs, Inc.
~'(_ I'lalIlIUIt; aud blt;UIClTIlI(\'
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14,2010
Page 14 of 60
Novembcr 12,2010
Ms. Amy Patterson
Impact Fee Manager
Collier County Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee Updatc Study
Dear Ms. Pattcrson:
Enclosed is the Final Tcchnical Report for the Collier County Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee
Update Study. If you should have any questions conceming this report, please do not hesitate to contact me
or Nilgiin Kamp.
It has been our pleasure to have worked with the County staff on this important project.
Sincerely,
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
~-O rI K~~
Stevcn A. Tindalc, P.E., AICP
President
1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 . Phone: (813) 224-8862 . Fax: (813) 226-2106
1595 Soulh Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winler Park, Florida 32792. Phone: (407) 657-9210 . Fax: (407) 657-9106
195 Soulh Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 . Phone: (863) 533-8454 . Fax: (863) 533-8481
Table of Contents
Introduction
............................................................................................................
!nvcntory and Valuc of Capital Assets ......................................................................
Service Area and Population......................................................................................
Lcvel of Service.........................................................................................................
Cost Componcnt.........................................................................................................
Credit Component......................................................................................................
Net Law Enf()rcemcnt Impact Cost............................................................................
Calculatcd Law Enforcement Impact Fce Schedule ..................................................
Appendix A - Inventory Details
Appendix B - Building and Land Valnes Supplemental Information
Tindalc-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
Collicr County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14,2010
Page 15 of 60
I
I
6
21
21
23
26
27
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 16 of 60
Introduction
Law enforcement impact fecs arc used to fund the capital construction and expansion of
police service related land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the
additional police service demand created by new growth.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) was initially retained by Collier County in 2004
to develop a law enforcement impact fee program and again in 2006 to conduct an update
of the cost and credit components of the law enforcement impact fee, which relied
primarily on 2005 data. To comply with the technical study update requirements ofthe
impact fce ordinance and to cnsure that the impact fec calculations are based on the most
recent and local data available, the County has retaincd TOA to conduct a comprehensive
update of the County's law enforcement impact fee program. This report presents the
results of the law enforccment impact fee study for thc County and will serve as the
technical support document for the calculated law enforccment impact fee schedule.
There are several major elements associatcd with the development of the law
enforcement impact fee. These inelude:
. Capital Asset Inventory
. Service Area and Population
. Level of Service
. Cost Componcnt
. Credit Component
. Net Law Enforcemcnt Impact Cost
. Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schcdule
Inventory and Value of Capital Assets
According to infonnation provided by the Collier County Facilities Management
Department, thc County has approximately 265,000 square feet of building space used to
provide law enforcement facilities. This figure includes 263,000 square feet of primary
buildings and approximately 2,000 square feet of sUPPOli space. Support facilities are
defined as facilities without air-conditioning or space that is unlikely to be occupied by
personnel.
Table I shows a summary of the CCSO building invcntory. Inventory details are
presented in Appcndix A, Table A-I.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 17 of 60
Table 1
Land and Building Inventory
Building Value .
Building Type Land Square per Square 'Total Building &
Feet(l) L d V I (3)/
Foot<2) an a ue,."
^>
Primary Buildings 263,171 $270 $71,056, I 70
Support Buildings 1,994 $75 $ I 49,550
Total 265,165 $71,205,720
Total Acreagc'.' 27.39
Land Valuc per Acre'S) $170,000 $4.656.300
Total Building and Land Value(6) $75,862,020
(I) Sourcc: Appendix A, Table A-I
(2) Source: Appendix B
(3) Building valuc per squarc foot (Item 2) multiplied by the square feet (Item I)
(4) Source: Appendix A, Table A-I
(5) Source: Appcndix B
(6) Sum oftolal building value and land value
An important part of the impact fce calculations involves estimating the current value of
thc capital assets. Thc most reccnt law enforcement facilitics werc bid in 2006 and 2008,
and werc built in 2009. Given thc rcccnt decrease in construction costs, these projects do
not ref1cct currcnt building costs. As such, the value of cxisting buildings is determined
based on a review of insurance valucs of the existing invcntory and discussions with
architccts. Based on this analysis, an average unit value of$270 per squarc foot was used
for primary buildings and $75 pcr square foot for support facilities. These figures
represent a dccrease of approximately 10 pcrcent fi'om the current adopted building
valucs.
In tenns of cstimating current land values, an analysis was conducted to determine the
value ofland wherc existing law enf(,rcement facilitics are locatcd and land values in
subareas ofthc county whcre future facilities are being planned. In addition, land use
charactcristics of thc areas wherc existing facilitics arc located wcrc also cvaluated. Both
vacant land sales and the currcnt value of vacant parcels as reported by the Collier
County Propcrty Appraiscr werc evaluated to determine thc dif1erentiation in land values
in ditlercnt parts of the county and for dif1ercnt land uses. This analysis resulted in an
avcrage valuc of$l 70,000 per acrc, and is cxplained furthcr in Appendix B. This figure
reprcsents approximately 55 pcrcent decrcase in avcrage land value per acre fi'om the
current adopted figurc.
Tindalc-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Novembcr 2010
2
Collier County
Law Enforcemcnt Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 18 of 60
In addition to the land and buildings inventory, the CCSO also has the vehieles and
cquipment to perform its law enforcement dutics. Table 2 summarizes thc equipment
inventory. Equipment ineluded in this list follows the State's definition of capital assets
for all equipment except for weapons and tasers. Florida Statuc 274 defines capital assets
as items that have a minimum value of $1 ,000 and one year of useful life. Although
weapons and tascrs have an average value of less $1,000, the CCSO qualifies thcm as
capital assets since they are considered sensitive material/equipment.
It should be noted that the total equipment value increased by approximately $20 million
since the last update study. Approximately $10 million of this increase is due to the
CCSO providing a more complcte invcntory and current value of ccrtain itcms, such as
the vehicles. Because the equipment list is extcnsive, typically the cost provided by the
CCSO is historical purchase prices. As infonnation becomes available, the CCSO
provides current value of certain items. The remaining increase is due to a combination
of incrcased units, use of differcnt types/model of certain items with a higher value, and
update of current val ues.
Given this large increase, to provide a conservative estimate, only the value of items that
were previously excluded inadvertently and the value ofvehieles and equipment
purchased since the last study were added to the inventory value ineluded in the previous
study. These purchases are listed in Table 15. The equipment/vehicle inventory should
be monitored carefully ovcr the next couple of years, and if the total value continues to be
large, it should be reflected in the impact fee calculations to capture the full cost of
providing law enforcement services in Collier County.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
3
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 19 of 60
Table 2
Equipment Inventory
.......
Number of
Equipment Description Units!') Unit Cost(') . Total \..osr("
Fumiture 104 $8,095 $841,856
Office Equipment 99 $2,901 $287,206
Recording Equipment 19 $2,231 $42,392
Minor Recording Equipment 21 $6,929 $145,500
Minor Computer Equipment 639 $3,604 $2,303, f 77
Desktop Computers 719 $1,550 $1,114,450
ITD 4 $1,680 $6,719
Major Computer Equipment 219 $28,425 $6,225,149
Computer Software 112 $23,077 $2,584,581
Laptop Computers I,OM $4,100 $4,362,400
Minor Appliances I $3,221 $3,221
Security 13 $3,833 $49,827
Recreation and Training Equipment 14 $11,054 $154,752
Minor Recreation and Training Equipment 14 $6,938 $97,131
Medical Equipment 571 $1,746 $997,057
All Classes of Weapons 690 $362 $250,010
Tasers 30 $385 $11,543
Range Equipment 5 $15,791 $78,954
Photo 6 $3,753 $22,516
Digital Camera 28 $1,890 $52,931
Camera 29 $1,827 $52,986
In-Car Video 419 $5,000 $2,095,000
Camera Equipment 51 $6,007 $306,374
Projector 23 $3,411 $78,452
Digital Camcorder 16 $2,61'1 $41,779
Camcorder II $2,422 $26,640
Utilities 4 $14,809 $59,235
Boat Equipment 32 $6,404 $204,924
Bnats 10 $41,069 $410,686
Aircraft 0 $390,933 $781,865
Minor Communication Equipment 89 $18,504 $1,646,842
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Novembcr 2010
4
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14. 2010
Page 20 of 60
Table 2 (continued)
Equipment Inventory
.... . '.,el:
Number of ......
. ..')~!;j~;~i
. . Eouinment Descrintion Units!!) Unit Cost(2) .. T, " '.
Aircraft Equipment 36 $22,744 $818,773
Communication Equipment 57 $15,069 $858,935
Mobile and Portable Radios 1,422 $3.368 $4,789,296
Books 1 $ I ,453 $ I ,453
Night Vision 77 $4,437 $341,629
Polygraph Equipment 4 $3,725 $14,900
Traffic Equipment 20 $3,893 $77.855
Other Detection 31 $5,740 $177,945
Evidence Gatherin~ 118 $6,550 $772,847
Radars 524 $2,869 $1,503,277
Lasers 60 $3,600 $216,000
Traffic Control 6 $ I 2,655 $75,929
Protection 91 $1,985 $180,657
Sedans 583 $25,334 $14,769,722
Vans 49 $27,247 $1.335,103
PickuD Trucks 177 $27,500 $4,867,500
SUVS 40 $29,600 $ I, I 84,000
Specialty Vehicles 69 $ I 3,392 $924,051
Other Vehicles 16 $6,208 $99,323
Special Operations! Specialty Equipment! 76 $6.256 $475,459
Diving Equipment 28 $1,680 $47,050
K-9 Dog 12 $9.162 $109,938
K-9 Dog Equipment I $1,253 $1,253
Hand Tools 5 $1,610 $8,049
Shop Machinery and Equipment 110 $5,336 $587,011
Lab Equipment II $6,558 $72,141
Total 8,682 $59,646,251
Value Included in the Study(') $50,146,702
(1) Source: CCSO
(2) Source: CCSO
(3) Numbcr of units (Item 1) multiplied by the unit cost (Item 2)
(4) Calculated as thc sum of the value ofthe inventory included in the 2006 ($41.3 million) and
the value of items previously excluded unintentionally and value of items purchased since
the last study that wcre not included in the 2006 study (a portion of expenditures in FY 2006,
and expenditurcs in FY 2007 through FY 2009, sec Table 15 for further detail).
Tindale-OIiver & Associates, Inc.
November 20 I 0
5
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 21 of 60
Service Area and Population
Although the CCSO has countywidc jurisdiction and provides services countywide, law
enforcement services are provided primarily in unincorporatcd areas of the county and in
Everglades City. Other municipalitics within Collier County have separate law
enforcement agencies that have the primary rcsponsibility of providing law enforccment
services in thcse areas. Therefore, for impact fee calculation purposes, thc primary
benefit district for law enforcement is thc unincorporated county and Everglades City,
and the population figures are calculated for this area.
The law enf()rcement impact ICc program rcquircs thc usc of population data in
calculating current lcvels of service and pcrfonnance standards. To ascurately determine
dcmand for law enforcemcnt scrvices and to be consistcnt with thc population utilized in
thc County's comprehcnsivc planning and Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR)
process, this impact fcc study considers not only the resident or pennanent population of
the County, but also thc number of seasonal residents and visitors as well. Therefore,for
purposes of this teclmical analysis, the peak sea.wlllal population will be used in all
population estimates and projections, unless otherwise noted. Pcak scasonal population
projections uscd in the impact fee analysis reflect tigurcs providcd by Collicr County's
Comprchensive Planning Department and are calculatcd by increasing the County's
annual pennanent population by 20 pcrcent.
Table 3 prescnts thc population trends for the law enforcement service area of
unincorporated Collier County and Evcrgladcs City. The projections indicate that the
population of this service arca is projcctcd to incrcase by nearly 45 perccnt between 2010
and 2029.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
6
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 22 of 60
Table 3
Unincorporated County plus Everglades City
Peak Seasonal Population
.
Peak Season Percent
Year Population Fie;ure Change
2000 265,947
2001 280,750 5.57%
2002 296,983 5.78%
2003 313,767 5.65%
2004 328,690 4.76%
2005 340,572 3.61%
2006 349.741 2.69%
2007 353,108 0.96%
2008 352,886 -0.06%
2009 353,773 0.25%
2010 357,515 1.06%
201 ] 364,4 76 1.95%
2012 37] ,572 1.95%
2013 378,807 1.95%
2014 386,182 1.95%
2015 394.290 2.10%
20]6 403, I 59 2.25%
')017 412,227 2.25%
2018 42 I .498 2.25%
2019 430,978 2.25%
2020 440,067 2.11%
202] 448,747 1.97%
2022 457,599 1.97%
2023 466.625 1.97%
2024 475,830 1.97%
2025 484,484 1.82%
2026 492,566 1.67%
2027 500,784 1.67%
2028 509,141 1.67%
2029 5 17,638 1.67%
Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Department
June 11,2010)
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
7
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 23 of 60
Apportionment of Demand by Residential Unit Type and Size
The residential land uses to be used tClr the law cnforcement facilities impact fee
calculations include the following:
· Single Family Detached
· Multi-Family
· Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down)
Table 4 presents thc number of residcnts per housing unit for the residential categories
identified abovc in Collier County. This analysis ineludes all housing units, both
occupied and vacant.
To addrcss fairness and equity issucs between land uses, as well as to addrcss affordable
housing issues, the single family land use is tiercd based on three categories of square
footagc: less than 1,500 square fcet, 1,500 to 2,499 squarc feet, and greater than 2,500
squarc feet. To accommodate thc tiering of impact fec asscssmcnts for the single family
residcntial land use category, an analysis was completed based on housing unit size and
persons per housing unit, comparing nationwide avcragcs to thosc of Collier County.
This analysis utilizcd national data ti-om the 2007 American Housing Survey (AHS) and
data from the 2000 Ccnsus data for Collier County to examine this relationship.
To calculate the tiering f()r the three diflerent categories, national residents per unit ratios
for each housing unit catcgory were applicd to the total residcnts per housing unit ratio
for singlc family detach cd land usc.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates. Inc.
Novcmber 2010
8
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 24 of 60
Table 4
Residents per Housing Unit
> Re!ide~t$l
" ~(),u~,ing'];'
Housing Type Population(l) Housing Units'l) RatiolJ) , U;'itS(~);tf':
Sil~e Family Detached 138,924 45,678 3.04
- Less than 1.500 sf 92% 2.80
- 1.500 to 2,499 sf 100% 3.04
- 2,500 sf or greater 111% 3.37
Multi Family 90.817 55,319 1.64
Mohile Home/RV (Tied Down) 22,901 10.601 2.t6
Weiohted A veraue 252,6421 111,5981 2,26
(I) Source: 2000 Ccnsus, Table B-33, adjusted for peak seasonal population, based on the ratio
of penn an en I 10 peak seasonal population (20%)
(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table B-30
(3) Ratios developed based on national persons pCI' household data derivcd from the 2007
Amcrican Housing Survcy
(4) Figures for Single Family Detached, Multi Family, and Mobile Home are calculated by
dividing population (Itcm I) by housing units (Item 2). Figures for differcnt tiers of the
Single Family Detachcd land use are calculated by multiplying residents per housing unit
figure of 3.04 by the associated ratio (Item 3).
Functional Population
Since Collier County Sheriffs Office (CCSO) provides law enforcement services to all
residents, workers, and visitors, morc than the peak seasonal resident population needs to
be considered. Traditionally, population was used as the basis of current and future
demand for certain facilities. In the case of law enforcement facilities, the higher the
nonresident daytime population is, thc grcater the need for service relative to the resident
population. Moreover, it is not enough to simply add resident population to the number
of employees, since the service-demand characteristics of cmployees can vary
considerably by type of industry. Using unweighted population and employment data to
estimate facility needs may result in substantial elTOr.
Functional population is the equivalcnt number of people occupying space within a
community on a 24-hours-per-day, 7-days-per-week basis (Nelson and Nicholas 1992).
A person living and working in the community will have a functional population
coefficient of 1.0. A pcrson living in the community but working elscwhere may spend
only 16 hours per day in the community on weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends
for a functional population coeflicient of O. 76 (128-hour prescnce divided by 168 hours
in one week). A pcrson commuting into the community to work five days per week
would have a functional population coefficient of 0.30 (50-hour prescnce divided by 168
hours in one week). Similarly, a pcrson travcling into thc community to shop at stores,
Tindale-Oliver & Associales, Inc.
November 2010
9
Collier County
Law Enforccment Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 25 of 60
perhaps averaging 8 hours per week, would have a timctional population cocfficient of
0.05.
Functional population thus trics to capture the prcsence of all people within the
community, whether rcsidcnts, workcrs, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of
effcctive population needing to be scrved. By estimating the functional and peak
seasonal population pcr unit ofland use across all major land uses in a community, an
estimate of the demand tor certain facilities and services in thc present and in a future
ycar can bc calculated. Thc following paragraphs explain how functional population is
calculated for rcsidential and nonrcsidential land uses.
Residential FUllctional Populatioll
Developing thc residential componcnt of functional population is simpler than developing
the nonresidential component. It is gcnerally estimatcd that people spend one-half to
three- fourths of their time at home and the rest of each 24-hour day away from their place
of residence. In developing the residcntial componcnt of Collicr County functional
population, an analysis of the County's population and cmployment characteristics was
conducted. Bascd on this analysis, it was estimatcd that people, on average, spend 16.4
hours, or approximately 68 pcrcent, of cach 24-hour day at their place of residencc and
the other 32 pcrcent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables 5 and 6. The
resulting percentagc from Table 6 is used in thc calculation of residcntial coefficient for
the 24-hour functional population. These calculations are presentcd in Table 7.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 20 I 0
Collier County
l.aw Enforcement Impact Fee Study
to
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 26 of 60
Table 5
Collier County
Population and Employment Characteristics
. Item/Calculation Step ..... ..' Figure
Workers who live and work in Collier Count/I) 95,020
Workers who live in Collicr County but work elsewhere(2) 8,048
Total workers living in Collier County(3) 103,068
Collicr County Census 2000 Population(4) 251,377
Total workers as a percent of population(5) 41. 0%
School agc population (5-17 years)16) 36,507
School age population as a pcrcent of populationl)) 14.5%
Population net of workers and school age population(8) I I 1,802
Other population as a percent of total population(9) 44.5%
(I), (2) Source: Burcau of Transportation Statistics, Census Transportation Planning
Package (CTPP) 2000 Part 3 (figures for Year 2000)
(3) Sum ofthc workers who live and work in Collier County (Item I) and workers who
live in Collier County but work elsewherc (ltcm 2)
(4), (6) Source: US Census Burcau, 2000 Census
(5) Total workcrs living in Collier County (Item 3) divided by total population (Item 4)
(7) School age population (ltcm 6) divided by total population (Item 4)
(8) Total population (Itcm 4) less total workers living in Collier County (Item 3) and
school agc population (Item 6)
(9) Population net of workcrs and school age population (Item 8) divided by total
population (ltcm 4)
Table 6
Residential Coefficient for Functional Population
Population Hours at Percent of Eff~~~ive
Group Residencell) Population(2) Hou;s(3) ..
Workers 13 41.0% 5.3
Students 15 14.5% 2.2
Other 20 44.5% 8.9
Total Hours at Residencel4! 16.4
Residential Functional Population Coefficient(5) 68.3%
(1) Estimated
(2) Source: Table 5
(3) Hours at residence (Item I) multiplied by percent of population (Item 2)
(4) Sum of the effective hours
(5) Sum of effective hours (Item 4) divided by 24
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Novembcr 2010
II
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Ul
-
s:::
Q)
(,)
1E
Q)
o
U
s:::
o
..
.!!!
I'- ::J
Q) 0-
- 0
.go..
I-Cij
s:::
o
..
(,)
s:::
::J
LL
III
...
Q)
s:::
Q)
C)
<;a;€..
= '.C 5
.S! oS 'C
'g g,e
, Q .
~=..e
t:g
"..
" .
>, .
=~
SE
, "
= 'C
. ....
~ t:
.'!l Q,
>
t: ~'
" ti
~ -S'
.~ e
:; ~
;€Cl"
~ 1lll 'C
:; g<F-o
Q ti .
o !i.
,
Q
!.:.c
. .
. 0
; ~
.!;
;......5:
. . .
:t c. ~
'a.~
~'c Q"
O!-oO .9
...!:!-G,l
~ ~
a.,g
'C e
......
ti ~
........:::,
.s l: ~
e~s
.. ="
..'-'
I::l
to
r
.. .
~~
.!! 0
, .
"e
:. ~
0.
e
..
.
.
"
""
Q -"
. 'C
~...
.
.
o
~~~~~I~ .x ~
000000_::; '::>::.-
..,. (-,
~ .,
~ 0'
;;6568_6850
............''''''''''.,'''...... '" >c r--
g56gg~5 g:5
~~
00
co
:gg
o ~
~ ~ ~
C::;C'r-,c~n
0' ~
- ~
00000000
M ''1 M M
~ ;:::~::' ;::: ;:::
~;:::::.~;:;~~?;~~
------- --
"i
~
.r.'r,
,~ 'r,
e 'r, ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
- - - - - ....1 _
~
8 ~I ~ 8 5; ~: ;~
c" M (.l,...., M "., M r-- _
-J; (1_
'r,or\
~.
5c,;~5g_ g:::;,
~ ~ 0-.::1' 0' 0' :J' ::I' ~
<,c
_=!-2
c -<'(
- ~ 66;::- z ~
z-
"
';
"
~
E
"
~
~
'"
"
~
~
" '"
E-a
:i ~
o "
..z
o
o ~ ~
.; -g 2
::: r::: 1; s:
@ ~ -g.EO.:;;
o '" r::: ,; 'U
~~ ~ 'J
oo_~~
2 ~ .~ ~ J
"
o "
~ ~
i 'j
0:2
>
.2
:2
".
"
f2
c,
.
g
gl
~
2
g
~
"
i=
"
~
"'
"
.
o
.
..
"
]
"
L
]
"
"
0.
"
"
.g5__
~ ~
.5 a
:C5
. .
Coi)':J)
" "
"..
11 oj) } v
.n ~, 'U ~ v
"2 - 0 ..s' 5'
:;! "E."'i5.. 0.0.
-5 5 ~ ~ ~
'I) v t "
c..c.c.a..o..
~
.."
:::: 5
"'
'" ~ i;'
y~]~
~ !j .~
~ r~ ~ 1;
1.1 ~ 5;
"..> ,,,rl '"
-:; ;l"5
= ]t=~~t-
:: ~ 'J.J5 ~ -5 ~
1.> .;:( :::.. 0 coo
~ ~ c::~~~~
'oJ '::::- c5: E ~:: t:
o ~ -
o-rl
"
L
-0
"
~
J
.
,
;:;:
~ "
'" .,. c
::. ~1 t:
-
"-
5h f#'E
2. c. 2
;;'
.~
~ ~
~ .
" "
" <
<
;:2~~
" "
"':::l -:J .~
::> -::; a.
U J
~E:~
'"
'"
~ '" - ''1 OC
~ .~~:;;;
.~ l-.. "'-
~
~ "~ ';l;.
t::l Q _ 0
:;;~F;~S
, "~
'" "01
e.. ;;:.00
.~ ~ 00
~ '"
=+~;;
- '" ('",1
'~.,. N
t~
e..-""
~ ~
~ ,.
;;: 9-
c:J
~:::::cg
01 'r, ..., o.f)
0i6I;:~~
.
~
"
~
E
o
-=
~ ~-~~8
ec: :to <=> 0 0
!
~
.
g.
~
"
.. 't::;.~
'l:; -<e '
/:I::: .... '0::>
"
.::, ~-
,::
;;:;: i'i,:g
~'I ..., M
..c"T""
~ ;"" ~ ~ ''-' s::
E: ": ..., t--
~ ~
~ .~
~
,:
~~~!~
::i-~..-.:::2: .:
"-'::i'lgC"":l
~:7; II.>
C 'J -'-< 'f) ~ -2n
":"6 ;7, ~:7; ~
~.,g ~'01 ei,;>
.. .... i:: _ II.> '-
I:l:: B ::I "'l Cl:': :::>
70 E ~ 11.I E
;:; ~ ~o g. ~
ZUCl:':u;
;; ~1
('"'1''-'
~
<
.2
:2
~
o
o
0'
^
,
.2
:2
~
'"
~
~
o
o
0'
.
~
~
"
[;
- Q. 1:;' ~
-::l.5 t =
o 11.I ::I <lJ
~~ ~~
~. ~ !: .2:!
1.,g 2.,g
~3:: ~=s:
~-g :g-g
<= "'l ~ 11 <':I. Q..:,
g::J: ;::i;:J 5~
Z~B2r=:j5
- ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ E'
'f) ;::::-1 ;:; r/) ~ ;; Vl -::l
c:' E ;:; ~ :2 U ~ ,~
<':I~:;:,_:.5.~_
1:O'..,g '3 <':l ,. ~ ,"_
11 _9- ~ ~ Z <= w ~
g.~.cu::g~e:E
_ . ('-I ci w..., 'n
oE~3.g'E2~E
'" e ;:; 2 II)
('"~ ~ ~ 2 "- :".-
~ g- ~ 03 ~ ~ OJ Q..
.:::: u 0 ti f- 0 ~
;ou':~,:r:~
~~1::.li_~~~
o.~~;:g~~~
~22.2.B~:U:5..B
~j6~@?
:::>0>-,0 .::;.
=~~~t28
'"
~
~
[ ~
" -
- ,
- 0
f-~
~ ~
"
03
E
"
03
~
~
o
~
'0
""
.
~
"
~
~
o
0.
e
.
"
e
,
~
2
.
>
o
o
)j
"
~
"'
.
~
"
E
;;'
"
o
o
"'- ~
f
~~
:E ~ f'
~ ~ ~ j
]:; ~ ~
~ 23 ~ ~
.g- -" ;:;
- II)].~ fl c:l
R~~~ ~ 2
~ - .
:: ~~~ "":l ::
2.~~C ~~~
~<':I~g "2~u
:::> II) ~ ::r: ; 1:l Ii;
.'-" ::: :;: 0 ] "l E
o~!:!'~~t:~~
~ ~>~.~E~
~;:;~~~~E-5
11.I E U:u eo ~ '-
~5~2~~6
~ 0'" E i;;'~ 0; cO
~~~D2g:3
-:::- ~ _ 1.> l' 1)....J "l
n_~ ~~.~~~ ~'~!i
_ "":l 1) '" 1) "'......
~g~,>~~.Vi5
'" ",.2 .2"0:::
;.., 1) c.. ~ I::.. c: '"
:::>~E1)gE<':I'::
f 1: t;: g ::r: ~ ;: ~
1) ~ ~o: ;:; a. E E
a -g :: '-' I::.. E ~
6 ~ .:: 1) <::
:~ .... U :i 0
~ 1::..,..... -F ibo
:u ;:; - e c' ~
;:: 0 ~ 1) O;l E
t:i <::;; ;;:=: <2
..g 0 '-' - <=
=~1 -5:2-
"'0 "3 tij ~ "3 ;:,-
1) ~ >' c,.g ~
]~~ ~~~
=2~ 3~E
~g~ ~g,g
~ ~ ~ t; ~
18 ~6 ~
~~;:: .<::::0.
Q. C .,g 5
1;' g <2 ;;:-
~ ~ 11:2 ~
o "'0 0 "'l ~
11 .9 o.~ ;!
E E 1) -=
~ 'j ~ ~ ~
~ ~ IS. -g ~
~1 ~]~
f-f-
>.
L
~
"
g-
o
E
"
B
.~€€
C;=n
i:
"
;:l
o
U
'-<
15
'0
u
'"
"
"
~
u
"
S'
-
E
"
S
"
e
c8
"
~
"
"
..-I
n
C
N
u
..s
vi"
"
OJ
'u
o
00
00
-<
o<lo
'-<-
.~ ~
6 il
~~
"'
""
S '
1-2
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 28 of 60
Nonresidential Functional PO/Julation
Given the varying characteristics of nOillesidential land uses, developing estimates of
functional residents for nonresidential land uses is more complicated than developing
estimates of functional residents for rcsidentialland uses. Nelson and Nicholas originally
introduced a method for estimating functional resident population, now used
intemationally. I This method uses trip gencration data from the Institute of
TranspOliation Engineers' (lTE) Trip Gencration Manual and TOA's Trip Characteristics
Database, infonnation on passengers per vehicle, workers per vehicle, length of time
spent at the land use, and other variables. Specific calculations include:
. Total one-way trips per employee (ITE trips multiplied by 50 percent to avoid
double counting entcring and cxiting trips as two trips).
. Visitors per impact unit based on occupants per vehiele (trips multiplicd by
occupants per vehicle less employees).
. Worker hours per week per impact unit (such as nine worker hours per day
multiplied by five days in a work week).
. Visitor hours per week per impact unit (visitors multiplied by number of hours per
day times relevant days in week such as five for offices and seven for retail
shopping).
. Functional population coeflicients per employee developed by estimating time
spent by employees and visitors at each land use.
Table 7 also shows the functional population coefficicnts for nonresidential
uses/categories in Collier County. The functional population coefficients in Table 7 were
;
used to estimate the County's functional population in Table 8. .
I Arthur C. Nelson and James C. Nicholas, "Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning,"
Journal of Urban Planning and Development 118(2): 45-58 (1992).
Tindale-Oliver & Associatcs, Inc.
November 2010
13
Collier County
Law Enforccment Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14.2010
Page 29 of 60
Table 8
Functional Population - Year 2010
.
Collier County Functional Resident Functional
Population Category Baseline Data(l) Coefficient(l) Populatio'n(3) ;-'e
2010 Peak Season Population 357.515 0.683 244.183
N()n~Rcsidclltial Population (Employees and Visitors)
Natural Resources 7.022 0.379 2.661
Construction 11.427 0.271 3.097
Manufacturing 2,934 0.270 792
Transportation, Warehousing, and Utilities 2.580 0.271 699
Wholesale Trade J,.fW, 0.271 947
Retail Trade IS.OJO 1.374 20.651
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 23.52-1 0.292 6.869
Services 64.226 0.561 36.031
Government Scrv ices IIPi6 0.497 5.813
Total N()I1~Rcsidential PopuJatioll by Catcgory,(4) 77,560
2009 Total Functional POJlulationl") 321,743
Ratio of Functional Population to Residential Population 90.0%
(I) Source: Tablc 3 for Ihe 20 10 populalion. To determinc the employment within the law
enforccment scrvicc area, the ralio of cmployment in unincorporated county and Everglades
Cily to thc countywide employmcnt was detcrmined. based on socioeconomic employment
data developcd for thc Collier County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. This ratio is
then applied to the countywide population ligure li'OJn Woods and Pool to determine Ihe
employment figure within the law enforcement service area.
(2) Source: Table 7
(3) Functional population is calculated by multiplying Collier County 2010 baseline data (Item I)
by Ihe fimelional resident coefticicnt (Item 2).
(4) The total non-residential population by category is the sum of the employment and visitor
figures from the nine categories (e.g., construction, manufacturing, etc.)
(5) The total functional population is thc sum of the residential functional population (244,183)
and nonresidential funclional population (77,560)
Table 9 prcsents the County's annual functional population figures from 2000 through
2029, based on the 20 I 0 functional population figure from Table 8 and the annual
population growth rates fi'om the population figures previously presented in Table 3.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
14
Collier County
Law Enforeemcnt Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 30 of 60
Table 9
Unincorporated Collier County and Everglades City
Functional Population
(2000-2029)
Functional Population
Year Projections
2000 238,81 I
2001 252,184
2002 266,811
2003 282,019
2004 295,556
2005 306,196
2006 314,463
2007 317,608 ;
2008 317,290
2009 318,242
2010 321,743
2011 327,856
2012 334,085
2013 340,433
2014 346,901
2015 354, I 86
2016 361.978
2017 369,942
2018 378,081
2019 386,399
2020 394,513
2021 402,403
2022 410,451
2023 4 I 8,660
2024 427,033
2025 434,720
2026 442,110
2027 449,626
2028 457,270
2029 465,044
Source: Table 8 for the 20 I 0 population figure. Figures
for other years arc based on the respective aJillual
growth rates peak population figures provided in
Table 3.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
15
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 31 of 60
Functional Residents bv Soeci(ic Land Use Catef!.orv
When a widc rangc of land uses impact services, an estimate of that impact is needed for
cach land use. This section presents functional population estimates by residential and
non-residcntialland uses.
Residential and Transient Land Uscs
As prcviously mentioncd, thc average number of persons per housing unit in Collier
County was calculatcd fi)J' the single family, multi family, and mobile home/RV (tied
down) land uscs, based on inl(mnation obtained from the 2000 Census. Bcsides the
residential land uscs, thc table also ineludcs transient land uses such as hotels, motels,
nursing homes, and adult living facilities (ALF). Sccondary sources, such as the local
Convcntion and Visitors Burcau (eVB) and tbc Florida Dcpartment of Elderly Affairs,
are used to determine thc occupancy rate lor hotel, motel, and nursing home land uses.
As mentioned before, ditTercnt functional population coenicients must be develop cd for
each of the impact fce areas to be analyzcd. For residcntial and transient land uses, these
cocfJicients are displaycd in Table 10.
Nonresidential Land Uses
A similar approach is used to estimate functional residents for nOillesidential land uses.
Table 11 reports basic assumptions and calculations, such as trips per unit, trips per
employee, employccs per impact unit, one-way trips per impact unit, workcr hours,
occupants per vehiele trip, visitors (patrons, cte.) per impact unit, visitor hours per trip,
and days per wcek f()J' nonrcsidentialland uses. Thc final column in the tables shows the
cstimated functional resident coefJicients by land use. These coefficients by land use
create the demand componcnt f()r the law en!(lrCemcnt facilities impact fee program and
will be used in the calculation ofthc cost per unit for cach land use catcgory in the impact
fec schedule.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Novcmber 20 I 0
16
Collier County
I.aw Enforcement Impact Fee Study
-
l:
Q)
VI
l:
C'll
...
I-
't:l
l:
C'll
oc'll
.....-
l:
Q) Q)
-'t:l
,Q 0-
c'll VI
I- Q)
0::
...
.2
VI
-
l:
Q)
't:l
o(ij
Q)
0::
c'll
l:
o
-
(,)
l:
::::l
U.
VI
Q)
VI
:J
't:l
l:
c'll
...J
-
.. =
~..g ~
~.~ =
;;.~
..
:'t:I~
:l.!:l
; =
.~ u
."r:I:S
-< ~
Q!
I
...
u .!:l
u =
~ u
~=!
.. u
=~
~
~ c
~ .s
'" .-
.- ~
:,:;;
~
~
.;
;;0
..
u
...
tig
......
~ u
>> u
~ ~
>>
=
~ "'c
~ =
= =
~ ==
l:~
'-l 0=
~;;o
= ..
~:
'"
u
u
=
;;::
"'-
.;
;;0
>>
u
;~
Q,:l
= =
lj ~
o
"
-
.;
;;0
..
u
...
[:u
_ ;;0
..
-
~ ."'.:::
0,=
5;;0
-
u
~
;;0
'"
=
=
..
oc 0 r-~ 00
O;C:'"" "":
-!"'-I l"i --
o '<:I" r-.",..."o
00 c: rr~ '~ -
N M r", - N
00000
- - - ("'.1 '"1"
(",1l"'1 \"'1 N ("'1
.g.g.g.g.g
-0
~
i ]'ti~
-= Q) 0 ~,
W ClOg::
! 2;.~ "'1"
U - 1"';
=:.! 8 a
=~-5.8
u u (/] g g
] Qh h'j or: In
u .::.....l r-i
~r:r;
"
"
"
~
'"
::;
';;;
. "
..:::.' 8
" 0
;;::r:
'"
.2!
_:.0
o 0
;:;;:;
~
81;
-0 =
.~ /::
t:.'-'
.,;
~ .~
~
...
ii
=
.~
=~-;;:;
E '0 -0
~;:r::E
..,. 0'- f'l Q',
I'-\Or-oo
~ocici
::0 \0
l- ~ <Ii
<E ;:... 1.l E
E g 8 ~
:5 Uo]
" ",-0
\j ~ .S ~
0...:"::: ~ "$
t::"O :l....Cl
~ U t:: 0
&.- ,E .9
d) il ~ ~
.~ .~ ~ ,~
~ g-~]
<lJ ~ 'fl c:
-S 0 0
'id1i]]
-S c .... gj
~:S &~
E iLl c: 0iJ
=- -0 i1:,.::::
i,g:: ~ 0
~ :g ~ ~
=' ': ~ ~,
-g o-'v)
.2: o~ t If)
NO"
U r-- c.. v
"0 ';' ~ ~
E 0.._ 'fl
;:;;. 'C :'j C
; ~ ~ ~
.J:: ~ .t .~
t:: -S] g d)
.g ....,-.-:5
:;~~Nl-
CJ.l ~ E a ~
..c: (;j 0 ~ ~
;0 .5_ 2 :;;l t;
... ~::I (;
'5 i5. - ~ ~
v..2; <':l C t::
~ 0. t:: "" .9 <(
'l.l ~ ~ 1) E g
~Q.t::gt::o"l:j
f-< N rC: ..s:: C ("1 C
--- . 1t::l :;;l
a"t;l -0 ~' I:: :'j ..2
~a8E~eoo
~E","'~t:a5g
::l5.g o~~
-g8;~~..~_a
~ .... ;,,>,-0 ~........ ('-0
l::~Eaa;O
~88.Et88~
E .S ... .~ r:/J .,@_"
] .~ ~ ,0 ~ 13 ~
~cu:;-s G'
:g2.~~>,5a
E~-5~~~g-
"'::I (J '" !o.. ~ .;::;, (J
aO"'-oe;l~g
(ij 0. 0 Q.. ::I
:i'o'5-c~o~
's .g ~ ~ Q. ~ ~
~ '] 1;; 5 ~,.:d ~ 1)
.~ 0 2 -: t '0 1) e
'o3-c"":l1)::;lu-5>..
1) ~ ~ a ; ~ C',~ g
.... ...... '" Co.. ;;.. ~ 1) ('Ij
,g2:''-~Oe;l(<jc;jg-
~ ~ .~ ~ .~ a. ~ B ~, ~
..J.=,-go::la~6g~
<r: 1) 1) l"'l ..0 "":l ..l:: (ij 11 1)
-5 ~:; ~ 1) 1) .~
,~ ,9- ~ ~ ~ "0 8 -
.s ~ .~ ~ ~ t ~ .~
~ ~ =E ~ .2 .c ~ ~
~~:B...~2E~
c;j '" ..... <2 ;z 1) 0 1)
.5 ~ <B 1) - ~ ~) ~
'r;; ';;;; 1) ie g 0 C 1)
~ ..5 ~ ,5 ("'I ~ '@ c:G
:::N=a~8.sf" g~
~
u
~
o
o
V>
r-r-r-r-
'"
o
o
c.
-"
~:U
C;c
..2 2
-0.
0-. 0- 0' 0\
~40;:r;
ci600
S ;;.,
0",
N 0
E8
"
" "
;;.., .:d
go
&U
= ~
" "
g~
v~
a
@
-;;
]
l"'~ N >00 >00
.r, lr, 00 r-
~c::oo-
--0-
-f'
"
-0
iU
~
1.1 0
25
~ E
..-:r: ~
'"
"
00
"'"
d2:':!
::;
c;:
u
-s
.e
=~ ==. ~ -;=.
'" '"
'" '"
c1
o
o
.0
-0
=
"
:I:
=
.9
~
"
=
u
----0
0.
.~
f-<
W-
i;
~
r....J .....
,~ "
N g
'8)
=
"'
N l"'1 0 "1"
l-:l-:~~
000
- l"'~ l"'1
r....J M '...0
E E
o 0
2 2
,2
E
::;
0.
~
"
.::;
]-6
.f' E
:: 0
g ~
u....g
~) 8
.; 1)
:.::i ~
-0
a
..l
~
=
o
:I:
",-0
= ~
';;; .~
" ~
o ~
z<
~
"
"
'"
~
~
o
~
~
o
>>>>
-""
5.8
Or/J
U OJ
]~
'0 <.)
ui:1
a
-
-
'"
OJ
8
OJ
<.)
....
<B
'"
u:.i
~
'"
....l
"
"
0.
~
o
o
:I:
'::
.~ 0
.- '"
g-~
o ._
" =
O::J
-0 "
= "
"0-
-d ~
.EJ "
,~ 7.::
~ 0
.:('::
-.J'-+
.~ ~ 2
~ ~ ~
" '" '"
f-< " "
= ::; ~ ~
.g u... ~ ;;:
:.a ~ ~
~~OO
;;6~~
~ u
1) e;l ;.-
.~ 0: 8
......
-
d
o
o
.0
-0
a ~
:I:::J
5 ~
._ 0-
~ '"
1) C .,.
c 1) _ l"'l
1) :::! :J --
o ~ .....
,9- c:G ~
~,~ fl
"'0 t:JJ .~ ;3
~t:.s~
E E ~ (l)
'Z 0 C c:G
~r..t::1)"'O
~"'::I~~
~ a ~.:;;
,-:;(<j ....."'0
S!~;t
tr)~e
; g
~ t;
- 0
:I: 0
~-
u
'"
-
uf
OJ
-
'"
'u
o
en
en
-<
"d
!)
.::
o
,
OJ
0;
"0
'"
E:::
o
-
o
'"
....
OJ
"S
OJ
:>
o
Z
.....
.....
~
..Q
III
I-
..,
o
ii
,,'" V, - c_ ~ .... '..l
;; ,,~-S,.. g. :5 c "'
.E ~ c .~ '5 '" ;c._~. g V ~ 0' ~ ~.,
~c... "'2~:a~"~]'-' "t:~"~-5
~~~82]~~~~-,8oi:~~3~3 2
"
g fl i
"=:'5! '"
~ fl IS
~ ct: ~
U
~;
~, t
~ ~
-
t
5=-€
.. .:!
;; ; I-
=
VI
Ql
VI
:::I
"C
c:
III
...J
III
:;:;
c:
Ql
"C
VI
Ql
...
c:
o
z
"€
~ :!
~...
~ .
o o!:
.r~
. .
o '
f:t :
~@v;
~i:e
l. u ~
o . ~
0"
E ,_
.2'~
f t:
'" ..
'----
.5
.:: t
Soj
~ ~
---;:-
~~'=
.. 0
'I: ;;.
...
...
o
....
VI
-
c:
Ql
"C
VI
Ql
e:::
III
c:
o
:;:;
u
c:
::::l
U.
",-
d5
...
'S
"
J
:;!; ::: :;: ~
o 0 0- 'r.
" " r-""
~ g ~: g
- - ::;, -
€
.
i
;;
~ ~ ~ ':;-
_ C", ~,., <"
?:, f;, ~ ~
0-. '" 0- 0'
- ~ ~
- -t -D "-,
- - - e',
":
i?, :! ;::-: 0
_ 0 _ r,
-'( <" or; '"
z ? ;:; 'r,
'" --D.-,
'" ~ ~: ~
_ C
~
:::?;;;'. :;
..,. "T -1" .".
" ~ ]
C ~
.
~
~
o
.
...
..0 t-, 00 C t-, r- or,
C 0 ~ '" 0 on
0000000_
",",...-, v, or. '" r- '" r-
g g 3 :5 g
,.., n r-, n ...., _ 0 _
o v, 0
C _ C
:1; 00 ;;g C' ;::- ~ ,~, 'n
o 0 eo.::;, 00 ". 00
- - = ..... - ~ = ':;'
0- ':l" 0' 0- :::- 0- 0- 0-
:2 oc ;;:; ;;; ,_ ..0 ~ "0
000_0..........'"
00 g, g, ~ <', ::3 ..c t-
ccoC'ooo.-,
r_ r~: ;"': '" .-, <6 ::; :::::
_ ::::. 0- n ~ fl ;::;
?,;~;::-g'n=~;?
- - - '" - 0- ...,. :::
t: r, ~~ ~ 'n ~ ..0 ~
" '" " ,r
-g ~ .." ~ ~ 0 "5 2;
Vi Vi v; 5 Vi 3 v; :::
-!
;; ,~
'"
- g
"
'-", ~
~ ~
,
u
i: it
'0 :;
~, ~
Q ~
]
~ .-, :; ~ ~ r.::
---00.....
>
"
5ifj
u "
"
u..
...--, '" on '" on on
...
~
'0
u
1:)
'"
!
"
"
S
"
u
...
<2
"
~
"
'"
...l
g g g g g g
c,
~.
or, ..,.
~ f; g v,
'" ," "';::::;
00 00 00 00 00 '"
"., '" '" ", ",..,.
C> C' c>- ~ 0"> c>-
"" .!.c ~
'" '..c or
00
00 _ ~
..,...,. "-,
r---- ~ r--, c..~ ::g ;;
.,...,. '" r'J.,.
r, rl '" r--,
'" ''', ", re, 0-
'--,,.-,,,- ,.- '--,00
..c ,;, ~ F' ~ 0::
- :::: = &. "" .--,
~ ~ ~ ~ ;' ~
" '" '" ,~
_2,g,g,g,
~
l1..:... '-'1
I.;.. r.n Vl
'-'1 c
vggg~
- g ~ ~ ~
_ ~ u
u
"
-
","
"
'"
G
o
'"
'"
~
d/Jo
...-
"0
.::: N
is il
~.;:>
'iil
'0
.5 '-
f-<Z
~
~
-~
III
CIl
III
~
"
c:
III
...J
III
:;:;
c:
_CIl
""
CIl .-
j III
c: CIl
._ c:::
- I
c: c:
o 0
~Z
.... ...
....0
-
Q) III
.c'E
III CIl
1-"
III
CIl
c:::
i i -'5
~:! 'C
c C IE
~ Cl: ~
V
-
. .
~'='-
:.1
.!l ~
-
.
I.o~g
.~ C ~~
> g !0-
il:
-
€
.
.i
~
"€
q
~~
~ II
0..
ti!
of .
. c
~ ::!
~@Ih
~s~
J., '" ~
. . ~
0..
! '-
~ ..
. c
- "
t t
~ ..
. s
. .
.. .
~
ai
;5 ~
.
... -
.., ':'~
~ c
'C "
~
~g
~
III
c:
o
:;:;
o
c:
j
u.
% ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ -
- <'. ,,' <'" ..... (', 0'.1 '" '" - _ 1" .... -1" _ _ 0 N N <:> 0 '" _ _ 0 _ _
;>,;>,
~]
O(/)
U"
'-< "
~~
"0 ~
U[t
-
1:1
"
S
"
u
'-<
<.8
"
~
"
'"
...l
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ g g ~ g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g
000 0 - - - - _ - _ 0 0 C - 0 0 0 0 _ 0 000 00-
~ ~ rl ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ g .... ~ '" ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ M ~ ~ "I ~ ~ ~ _ g ~ r,
r r ~ ~ r r r r r r r .... ~ N N ~ ~ v, ~ ~ ~ ~ r, ~ ~ ~ r
~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ : ; ~ ~ ~ ~
N:.;'~?;;::; :::_::!:"'or;"'~~~l ~"'~g:-
N
- e.
N
~
N
g <>0 :g ~ <r\
~ "" ::;; ""
~ s: 0 :;;; s: s: ;?, ~ :7, ;g ,_ ::: 0 :7, ~ :7, ~ ('I ~ ~ ~ ~ :? :7, :7, ~ $:
'" "j ..., N '" N ,.., N N - 0 - ...., <', ,,' N 0 rr, 'f'> 0 0 0 _ <', 0" _ _
~ ~ ~ ~ < < < < < ~ 8 ~ ~ < < < ~ ~ ~ < < ~ < < < < <
~j Z Z ~ Z z i z z ~ ~ ~ Z Z Z Z <', ; ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
0'0
g; ~ '" ;; ~ ~ f; ~: ~ ~ :~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;r: ~ ~ ~I g .-0 g; ~ g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~, ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;, ~ ~ ~ : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'S
"
j
.!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;~~~,...~;~~J",""
o ceo
:: g, ~ 5,
o 0
o 0
0, 0,
o 0 0 g ;,
5. ~ ~ :: ..0
~
"
..
.
01
.
.
..
.
.
.~
~ ~
. "
~ ~'
1 ] ~ ~
--< "<r;
01 01
o 0
~ ~
~ ~
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
g ~
B B
s ~ ~ ~ B S ~
~ ~ c.: c.: ~ ~ z
: : $
o 0 ..:
:: C; ..2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 '" 2' ~ ~
g g g g g i3 ~ g .~ ~ 1:: g g
::::sss s~..2~s=
.
~ ~
,
~ E
~ r
i-= u::
s
c
c .
c- ~
8 ::;
~ ,
~ <Il
... ... 1j
o 3 !::
~ cr. ~
o. ~I?
~I E:
~ ~ ~
~ 8 ~
~ 1'~
~ ; 8
2 ~ g]J ~
Cl Vi <:: <::
?; ~ ~ ;
!:: a v: <Il
i E_ ~ :.
~ ..
c- u: ,:t'J l:C
c.
r: -1'
--< - - ~<"( ~
:..r: ...J ...J "
" c: 1-1-"
~ ~ ~ ~ :s
:gg g~~~
j g g ~ S g ~
~ E ~ 0 C = ~ ~ ~
~ g g ~ ~ 0 6 t ~
~ ~ - g ~ ~ 6 ~
~
~ ~
" E
~ Cl
H'
" ~
~ ~
~If
:5 :i
u
"
-
'"
"
"
'C
o
~
"do
'-<-
"0
.~ N
6 ~
i?"S
'" "
'0 >
.s 0
E-Z
c ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ...
'" '" OJ
~~~~~~
-g ..::i ,.. ~ ~ <"(
~ tl Jl ~ ~ ~
ti: g 0 ~ .;: .3
III
Q)
III
::>
"
I:
ra
...J
ra
:;:;
I:
- Q)
""
Q)'-
;:j III
I: Q)
.- 0:::
- I
I: I:
o 0
~z
...
....0
....-
Q) III
-
.01:
ra Q)
1-"
III
Q)
0:::
ra
I:
o
-
o
I:
;:j
U.
~ ~ ,
,
" '" 0 0 0
g 5 .~
;; '" is
= .l
oi: ~
u
~. c_ ".
t .
~ :.
~ 0
. :<
"
. g ,- ,
. .!: - e 0
S . E~
:; '0
,. g ...
:c
I g: " 1 ~
" - "
'E
;;
~ 00 00
~ E~ 'c .,
= - - -
. ,::
~
e .
0 0
~
- o. 0 ,
t €.
~ =
= ~
~
~ 0 " 0;
~
:t;~ " - "
. - .
.0
= . ~
o~
~ ., ~
" 0
0 -- " 0 ,,,
0 ~
~ ..
... " -
, t ~
'" ~
c, ~ ~ t
0 "
t -t " 0 ~
~ >,
. = 0 ~
~ ... .,
'0 , i;
... '" -
0 "
,- ~ ~ ., "- ~
. , 0
.!: 0 " " "3 ~ 2
"- " ., .,
t .. " ., 0
'0 " ., .,
... .- k , .,
- ., ,
~ 0 .,
x
'" U 0 ., :c: x ~
- .n .,
:: ;0 ., ., , .,
~ .,
., ~
., ~ ] .,
1;
., ., ., ~ .,
;0 0 ~ " d
t g ., ~
j 5, ., ., " ., "
- ,
., -
., "
~ ~ j f l
~-' ,
c:J , ., x
- ., ., .,
., - ., .,
~ , ::i [ " ,~
~ " "
;r ~ ., .,
- -
., ,~ .,
- , - " 0 0
';c 3 ~ 0 e ;::-
,
0 ~ ., I
;5 ., .~, , d
~ ., 0 0 g. ,
= ., " - ~ x , g
. " " 0; , ., c 0 c 0 0 0 c
~ J e , , x d a c 0 0 0 " e 0
"'i e g 0 0 0 0 0
, ., ., 0 0 .,
" , a 0 ~ 0
X 0 ~, 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ :~; ., c 0
0 ., .,
~ ., g - ., ., 0 ,
" S 0 0 X , 5 5 0 ., ., ., .,
., " " - - - ., - ., ., .,
., 0 ., ., X .,
~ ., ., j j}
., ~ ., ., ~ 0 ~ ., ., ., ., ,
" , , , ,
., ., ~ & ., c ~ ~
] 0 re. 0 0 0 ., ., 0 ., ., ., 0
"
.;; ~ 0 ~ ., ., ~ ~ ~ ., ., " ~ " " ~ "
~ ., z. " ~
. ~ ~ 0 ., " - , , -
~ ~ , - " - ,- ., - - -
;::: , CC ., - -
~ ., v: - - .,
>
0-
;oj ""
0
U "
.... "
~ ""
t)
'0 '"
u '"
S
-
E
"
S
"
u
....
c8
'"
~
~
'"
>-l
u
c:
-
~.,
"
:;;
'u
0
~
~
~
o(j 0
.... -
.~ 0
N
is ....
"
, .D
" ~
-;;;
-g
~ Z
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 36 of 60
level of Service
Based on the information provided by the County, Collier County's 2010 level of service
(LOS) is 1.83 certified law enforcement officers per 1,000 peak residcnts. Table 12
presents the calculation of the existing LOS.
While the 20 I 0 LOS for is 1.83 officers per 1,000 peak residents, in order to calculate the
law enforcement facilities impact fcc, the LOS needs to be calculated in terms of officers
per 1,000 functional residents. Table 12 also illustrates the calculation of the currcnt
LOS using the total functional residents within the service area. The current LOS oflaw
enforcement facilities is 2.03 officers per 1,000 functional residents.
Table 12
Current level of Service
(Per 1,000 Peak Seasonal and Functional Residents)
Component 2010
Number of Certified Officers!l) 654
Peak Seasonal Population(l) 357,5 I 5
LOS (Officus per 1,000 Peak Residents) 1.83
Functional Population(3) 321,743
LOS (Officers per 1,000 Functional Residents) 2.03
(I) Source: 2010 Budgct Book, Collier County Sheriffs Office
(2) Source: Table 3
(3) Source: Tablc 8
Cost Component
The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of capital items, in eluding buildings,
land, vehieles, and equipment. It should be noted that a portion ofth'e law enforcement
buildings was funded through bond/commercial paper issues. The debt service on some
of thesc issues is being paid back with impact fee rcvcnues. As such, the outstanding
principal associated with dcbt service that will be paid back with impact fee revenues is
subtracted from the total invcntory valuc to ensure that the new development will not be
charged twice for the same facility. Table 13 provides a summary of all capital costs,
which amounts to approximately $144,000 pcr ccrtified law enforcement officer.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
21
Collier County
Law Enforcemcnt Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 37 of 60
Table 13
Total Capital Cost
Percent of
Item Fil!ure Tlli~I(9) .
Total Land Valuc11i $4,656,300 5%
Total Building Value(2) $71.205,720 42%
Total Equipment Valuc(3) $50.146,702 53%
Total Capital Assct Value(4) $ I 26,008,722
Less: Portion Not Paid forlS) $31,778,50 I
Net Buildings, Land and Equipment Value'6) $94.230.221
Number ofCel1ified Police Ofllcers(7) 654
Total Capital Value per Ofticer(8) $144,083
(I) Source: Tablc I
(2) Source: Tablc I
(3) Source: Table 2
(4) Sum of total land (Item I), building (lIcm2), and cquipment (Item 3) costs.
(5) Source: Oflice of Management and Iludget
(6) Total capital asset cosl (Item 4) less the portion not paid f()r (Item 5)
(7) Source: Tablc 12
(8) Net value of assets (ltcm 6) divided by officers (Item 7)
(9) Perceut of total capital valuc to be used for future indexing calculations. Percentages are
bascd on nct asset value (c.g., land perccntage is calculated as
$4,656,300/ $94.230.221 ~ 5%, and buildings percentage is calculated as
($71,205,720 - $31,778,5(1) / $94,230,221 ~ 42%).
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Table 14 prcscnts thc unit cost f()r the impact fee analysis. This unit cost was calculated
as the total capital cost of $144,000 per officcr multiplied by the LOS of 2.03 officers per
1,000 functional residents divided by 1,000. As shown in thc following table, the total
impact cost per resident is $292 for law cnforcement buildings.
Tindale-Oliver & Associatcs, Inc.
November 2010
22
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 38 of 60
Table 14
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Component Film re
Total Capital Asset Value per Officcr(l) $144,083
LOS (Officers per 1,000 Functional Residentsl2) 2.03
Total Capital Asset Value per Functional Resident(3) $292.49
(1) Source: Table 13
(2) Source: Table 12
(3) Total capital asset value per square foot (Item I) multiplied by the LOS (Itcm 2)
divided by 1,000
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging development for the law enforcement impact fee, a review of the
capital financing proi,'Tam for law enforcement services was completed. The purpose of
this review was to determine any potential rcvenue credits that should be considercd for
revenues generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities, land, and
equipment expansion for the law enforcemcnt program.
Credit for Capital Expansion Expenditures
The review of the capital expansion expenditures for FY 2005 to FY 2009 was completed
and reviewed with the CCSO.
The CCSO has three different sources for capital cxpansion expenditures:
. General Fund
. Grants
. Donations
Table 15 summarizes the capital expansion expenditures over a five-year period. This
table also specifies the funding source for each purchase. The annual revenue per
functional resident was calculated as thc average capital expenditures for expansion
during the fivc-year period divided by thc average functional resident population during
those years. This rcsults in $4.54 per functional resident, which rcpresents approximately
50 percent reduction from the previous study. During the previous study, the County was
using non-impact funding to build law enforcement buildings, which were subsequently
built. However, over thc past five years as wcll as during the next five years, the County
Tindale-Oliver & Associatcs, Inc.
November 2010
23
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 39 of 60
did not spend and has no plans to spcnd non-impact fee funds to built additional law
enforcement buildings. As such, the associated credit decrcased.
Table 15
Capital Expansion Expenditures(1)
Buildin2lEquipment FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Total..
DOl1alion.'I
Vehicles $0
Communication Equipmcllt $0
IT Equipment $0
Other Equiplllent $36,555 $16.478 $17,359 $547)86 $617.678
Onicc FUl11itun:/FquiDIl1C1l1 $0
Suhtotal-- Dmwt;olls $11 $36,555 $/6,478 $/7,359 $547,286 $6/7,678
General Fund
AuildillgS $5211.01111 $520.000
Vehicles $1511.IIIIU $448.3211 $50.111111 $648,320
Communication Euuiol11cnl $36.000 $108.000 $14.40U $142,539 $300.939
IT Equipment $18.000 $48.UOII $6.1100 $72.000
Other Eauioment $41.6011 $13.600 $15.000 $44,392 $114,592
(lllice Fumilure/Equinmcnt $62.334 $62.334
SlIbtolal- Ge1leral Fund 52114,111111 $645,9211 $6114,11110 $/5,0011 $249,265 $/,7/8,/85
Grants
Vehicles $95,000
Communication Equipment $797.988
IT Equipment N/A* $23,935 $1.095 $1.147.573 N/A*
WCilJOJlS $1.935
Stdtwarc $85.560
Other Equipment $13.194 $395.805 $20.456 $225.357
Office Furniture $14,160 $659.824
Suh/Oflll-. Grants $/,3311,396 $27,354 $4/9,7411 $2112, II/ $2,832,677 $4,8/2,277
To(al Capital Expansion Expenditurcs(2J $1,534,396 $709,829 $1,040,218 $234,470 $3,629,229 $7,148,141
Average Annual Calli'al Expansion EXflcnditurcsl31 $1,429,628
TOlal Annual Callilal Expansion Expenditures per Functional Rcsidcntl41 $4.54
I I
Annu<ll Functional Populatillt) J06,1%J J 14.46.1 J 17.6118 317.290 318.242
Average Functional Residents per Year (FY 2005.FY 2009(i) 314.760
(I) Source: Sheritrs Ot1icc and Growth Managemcnl DivislOn, Collier County
(2) Sum or cxpenditures from all threc sources
(3) Total capital cxpansioll expcnditurcs dividcd by livc years
(4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures (Item 3) divided by average functional
residents per year (Item 5)
(5) Source: Table 9
Credit for Debt Service on Capital Expansion Expenditures
Any outstanding bond issucs relatcd to law enforcement facilities expansion will also
result in a credit to the impact fce. Collier County funded Sheriffs ClD Building and
Shcriffs Administration Office expansion (Building "J" addition) through debt service.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 20 I 0
24
Collier County
Law Enforccmcnt Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 40 of 60
The debt service is being paid back with revenues from general fund. Outstanding bond
issues related to law enforcement facility expansion expenditures are presented in Table
16.
The impact fee credit is calculated by detennining the present value of the total payments
related to the bond issue that remain and then dividing it by the average annual
population estimated over the life of the bond issue. The resulting cFedit for law
enforcement facilities-related debt is $13 per functional resident, which is approximately
40 perccnt lower that the debt service crcdit given during the last study. The debt service
credit calculations during the last study includcd the same buildings and because a
portion of debt has becn paid over the past fivc ycars, the associated debt service credit
decreased.
Table 16
Bond Debt Credit Analysis
A verage 1nDu~~ '..
Total Present FUncdonll,~,,;j:', "....",..:."...
Number of Years Interest Remaining Value of :.:'opulati()J'::l
Bond Issue Years(l) Remaining(1) Rate(J) Law Payments During
Enforcement
Funding(~) Remaining Remaining Bond .
.'. Issue Period{~j
20-year Debt Service
(Law Enforcement
Facilities' Share) 20 10 Variable $6,013,988 $4,562,077 363,343 $]2.56
(I), (2), (3), & (4) Source: Office of Managemcnl and Budget, Collier County
(5) Source: Table 9
The total credit per functional resident is presented in Table 17, and it is equal to the
addition of the present value of the capital improvement credit and the debt service credit.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
25
Collier County
Law Enforccment Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 41 of 60
Table 17
Credit per Functional Resident
Component/Calculation Step Figure
Total Capital Improvement Credit per Functional Resident' \) $4.54
Capitalization Period (in ycars )'2) 25
Capitalization Rate(3) 5%
Future Credit pCI' Functional Resident(4) $63.99
Debt Service Credit'S) $12.56
Total Revenuc Credit'6\ $76.55
(I) Source: Table 15
(2) Capitalization period is estimatcd at 25 ycars, which is typically whcn major
renovations or replaccment of capital facilitics becomc necessary.
(3) Capitalization ratc is estimated at five pcrcent.
(4) Present value of $4.54 (Item I) over a 25-year period with a capitalization rate at 5
percent
(5) Source: Table 16
(6) Sum of future credit pCI' functional resident (Item 4) and debt service credit (Item 5)
Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost
The net impact fee per functional rcsident is the diflerence between the cost component
and the crcdit component. Table 18 prescnts the calculation of the net law enforcement
impact cost per functional rcsident.
Table 18
Net Impact Cost
Revenue
Impact Cost / Credit Element Impact Cost Credit
Impact Cost
Capital Cost pCI' Functional Rcsident'\) $292.49
Impact Credit
Total Revcnue Credit(2) ($76.55)
Net Impact Cost
Nct Impact Cost per Functional Rcsident']) $215.94
(I) Source: Table 14
(2) Source: Table 17
(3) Capital cost per functional resident (Item]) less total revenue credit (Item 2)
Tindalc-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 20]0
26
Collier County
Law Enf()rccment Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 42 of 60
The first section of Table 18 shows the total impact cost per functional resident as $292.
The second section shows a revenue credits for the law enforcement impact fee of $77
per functional resident.
The net impact cost per functional resident (third section of the table) is the difference
between the total impact cost per functional resident of $292 and the total revenue credit
of $77. These figures result in a net impact cost per functional resident of $2 I 6, which is
approximately 35 percent higher than the previous study because the inventory was
increased through additional buildings and othcr capital assets. Despite the decrease in
costs, due to the increase in the inventory and the decrease in the credit since the last
study, the net cost per resident increased.
Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule
The law enforcement impact fee schcdule was developed for residcntial and
nonresidential land uses and is illustrated in Table 19. Throughout the report a
comparison of updated figures to those ineluded in the 2006 was provided. Although the
net cost per functional resident increased by approximately 35 percent compared to the
2006 study, due to interim indexing, the total fee increascd by approximately 20 percent.
This change in fce varics for somc of the land uses becausc of the changes to the demand
component. Table 19 also presents the differcnce between the current and calculated fees
and an explanation of the effect of changes to the demand component.
Tindale-Olivcr & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
27
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Q)
::l
1J
Q)
.c
u
rJ)
Q)
Ol Q)
.,..u..
Q)
.c
C'Cl
I-
-
U
C'Cl
Co
E
1J
Q)
-
C'Cl
::l
U
C'Cl
U
.
-~
..
=
.
...
u
.
~
=
o
.
.
~
011
--
= -~
~ ..
" =
. .
~ ...
.. u
-= ",,"
e eu
. ~
= ..
U
- ,"-..
" = N
~t::!i
S@~:
- ::s.-
~ ti ~ :i
Zat==
..
'; =--..
= ~ ~
.!.!! OCJ
~ g, E
. = ~
'-~8
-
'.
;:>
-
"
.
..
.!!
~
.
;:>
..
=
.
..l
~
c.
o
a.
'"'
"
a.
~
~
o
?
~
~
o
...
-ci
"
E
~
a.
::J
~ 'rJ ~ i:;-
r1 r1 ('1 <"1
or, I'- CO r-,
'"T '.0 rl 00 _
("I CO _ r') cO
1:'1 Ir, 0' cr J:)
~...,,.., - 01
iAVl'oAiAtA
'r, >.C -c or, cr.
-1: - .0 co'r;
r10'. -.0 - 0-
--;-0'-;--
-t ..,. -T 1"1 M
lAlAlFJiA{,.q
~50~~
- r1 1"1 - -
~ ;:: :::l ::l
~"'O"'O"":l"'C
,~ ,E ~
=
,.
E
]t.i:
;; "
~~
~;)
.
'"
~
o;l ~
5- g 0
Ul ;r ~
~::r-,<2
5=;
e;
~
<':l -',
o
:if
Li:~=
_ ~ .o'~ Q3 ~
- <:'1 __ ::> c: '5 '"'
2 ~ ~:r::2
.
-:5 E
"
~ ;r,
=
.5 ;
~ 0
. .
= '''"''
>..
'" lO
-j .~
E ,
2~
"
5
E
o
.",
>.
" "
-5 3
= u
5 "
..!::: 3
!J -0
2,-,
... :/l
o "
= -
2.ft
::l <
o
:.J ~,
o
-:::.g '"
iU
~ 'a 1
a.
,
u
g
:.>-. ~
':.) 5
;5..c
a. "
"
'0 '"'
. "
o g
= 11
o 0
~cri
~ G '"
;:);., i:i
5~]
~ ;:; ~
"'0 '..;
" "
.g~
a. 0
.=. '....)
'0
0' ':..
'0 ..,
'0 ..,
"
i:} :J
E -f:
1: c
-
a...
" =
a 0
..
~~~
"":l '- <
~c:tz
",0 <:l,
=z
""
rl r)
88
3' '"
f'") Z
,~
~ ~
~
~5
00
or. "'T
~O
.., -
.r, r~
'r,O'
;A ""'"
~ ~
..,0
r-- ~
:::0 ~
e, 0
O~
8:=:
=
~ ~
"'2 ::l
...~
15.5
"
u "
Q.o.
, ,
"
- ~
~9-
:.J :J
u :.J
C 0
]]
on '"
" "
"'~_ 0
.E
1..> i:}
-t~
o 0
~ ~
" "
~ -;;
~-::l"'O
z5::3-
.::: '" 0"-
z ~~ ~
-t g:: ~~
:Z =:>_
." -
tA~
."
~
- r'1 ('-,
-.0:::::00
-C - t<
--:to'
_ VI_
~
-;-0'-;-
'n - -t
:::0 _ :J'.
,
"
~~]
...~
c.
-:r:
"
"
1..>1=
!: .::::
~::: -; ~-'
~J"":l C
~~.~~~~
3 ~:: a '....
Z<(~~:23
"
"
'"'
is
<
" Q.
1..> '5
"i: '-
o Ii
,
" "
" 0
0.0
.", ..c
a. "
o
.... ~
~ ;..
8
.~
~ -
'@ 1:t
~ '"
;:; c
"'-
"5 B
"E '5
~ 0
~]
-i
~
'0
o
'"
" .
" V>
~ '" ,
..c~~
~ .~ ~
o :: .~
~ = ~
..
E " ~
~ : ~
a ~ ~
~~c
u . ~
u u
o 0 ~
-g-g~
c::l <'::l C
~ g; .2
:::l ::s 'E
.EoJ::tio..
t; t; ;j"5
-c -S ~ t;
~ ~ "S ;-
-o-o-cc
~ E E ~
~ <r.:..g..g 4 13
zi55Sg
2;": 0'2. ;:;": <
0'1"-2
r-;r-; (',1
E
~
?
o
u
.
o
~
o
o
.
.
-"
"
~
."
!'
-
~
::J
o~
e,
."
o
;;;~~<<
~o-:......:zz
- N
~"" ~
o
~
o
~
co
'0
~ ('I <Xl 0'< ('1 0'< 0
0'< - N 'n ~ <Xl
('j 'n r--: - 'n (r, 6
- - - N...... ("I
1A\A1A\A\A_!iA
~
'^
e!
~
~
o
gS~=8~~
6000066
'n
iJ
~
~
ccc=='~c
:u 1.1 OJ :u :u 0 :u
-0-0--::-0-00-0
~~~~~S~
"
"
.S
"
2
~
~
.
'" E
"
;; ..
" .g
~ ~,
a
" '0
::: "
.2 c
" -
5
g ~
'r: 0
o E
~'€
:: <$.
I ~ ~
00
UU
~_.:J :5
C
~~
,C-"-' ~
~ ~ oJ:: <'::l
~ ~ ~ u
~ ~ e 8'
'0
.,go
u 0
V>'"
u
-"V>
~~
< '$ 0'2.
z~2:
~"
'00
NO
'" ""
""
'"
'T
o
"
n
""
o
'T
'0
n
~
~
~
';;;
o
o
'"
"
.~
o
:r:
>
1:i
"'
o
U
...
15
'0
u
ell
"
"
u.
-
u
ro
a
-
-
"
"
E
"
u
...
c2
"
~
"
co
>-i
,
"
c;-
u
"
-
~c
"
OJ
TJ
o
~
~
~
o<lo
... -
"0
.~ N
i3 b
"..0
~ F
"
~Z
CII
::l
"0
CII
-.I:
"0(,)
CII(/)
~ CII
.- CII
-LL
l:
0-
(,) (,)
_Ill
Q.
E
~;
..QCII
lll-
I-.!!!
::l
(,)
iii
u
en
....
I
I
,t
"
c
.
"
'"'
~
~
c'
Q
=
U
=
.
...~
~ ~.
t :;
.. "
'"'
-
= -.:
t"
'" ~
c ..
,",,'
... Ie. ii:'
~ """i Ct:i'
NN=';';
c. iI'l:::: =
E@" U
jooOI.;:5l
'Z.:=~ ::
;z;8l=
-; = 2_
el~' ii
~ .! "a
~ = IS
= go u
- ~ ~Q
-
';;
Ol'
-
w
.
..
a
~
u
p
..
c
.
""
ci.
'.5
"
"
..
,
"
"
g-
u
u
o
""
c
"
,
"
o
,g
"
"
"
is
~
""
"
;;
""
..
::0
e;~~~~
~...., M M ,..., r'1
<r, -1' '0 Qo., r-l
("'I '-D'~ ('I..c
1Xi'r)\o_oo
~J ~ ~:: f'l
Eo"! Eo"! &"\ b"l !A
r'1 a- l'"'l r..-, 'n
-D r) '"1" 0 r--
,D _ rl 6 r,i
=:> <.D r-l 0, r-
r...., r-l r-l -_
\A !A !A !A !A
('I .... M 00 0
""': <"I 0 00 OC!
-__00
't;';;;';;;'-;;;';;;
a oeo
g,~g<~g,
.
""
....u..U'l
"""''''
",trlooo
",,0000
~oooc
_ 0 0""1"
. 0'" 0 0
-g u.. ~ N ..,. a
~r/I __-=
=0-00""
~g OC~
~oogg~
C ,r, 'n - r-l O/J
IlIIl 1..l U (oj Il.l U
~ u~~~S
Ec;:500Q
o
""
B
t'
o
o
'"
"
"
"
is
"
oJ
1!
c
~
1!
E ~
"
"56-
'"
"" C
" "
;; ..
"" 0
~~
_ 0
0"'-
o
cO
N
<0
00
c,
'"
N
."
~
~
'"
N
~
't;
o
o
0,
..
u
'"
U
~
.
B~
'" ,
~ .
o e
",-,
~
"E "E
:20 .
=
,
~
..
o
u
u
o
"
.9
.~
.,
""
B
.r
"
"
c.
,
"
o
o
'"
"
"
'"
o g.
~ ::
1i ~
e ~
c 0
.2..@
;;
" "
" ~
;3 ~
" >
..""
-5 a
"E ci.
:g '5
.. u
::0 ..
g
"
"
..
,
~
..
o
u
u
o
i
o
o
.c
"
~ Q..
~ '5
"" u
~ ..
.g ~
;3"]
.
"
"
c.
o
u
u
o
""
B
,
is
o
'"
"
u
""
o
"
""
u
;;
""
Q,
::0
6":e:~o~::,':t:;Q~6':<f:
<'lor r;l r-- 00 '>D r- '.0 '"
...,. f').... 0 00 -.t C \""'1
CNOO_OO-t"'~
:~:;:!~~~~d:g;-;:;
r~, 'r, 'n ...-, 'n '"t ..". -t ,.
t,Ab"ltA!A\A\A!AtAlA
-1' 'n - r- 4" 0 0-, r-
O\Cf"IOOOO~OO'0('rj
-i 0\ - 'n M tn,D ('1-
'-DNmooO\Ot'Il"'l'"
r",\ 'n 'n '7 '" tn lI") trl ..".
IAlAVlVlVlVlVlVlEA
0, 'n '-0 'n <n "'t "1'" N ~
~ "':t: "'1: N r- ('l "'1: '"": ~
-/"-INNN<"'iN(,l('I
~ ~ ~ ~ t':I
'-:;; ~I;:e: ;:s12i1;:e:
0'" '" '" '" '"
8,gggg~
o,o_O,=:~
" " "
~I;:sl;:e:
, ~ ,
000
000
o. c; ~
I.l-I.l-I.l-I.l-U;
l.J...IZlIZlIZlIZlO
",~gggog
~gooo,goo
o~gggg.g
0- ('1 "'t'-O - 0
, 0
--00005
gooc:oo
cg~ggg~
or, - - ('1.,.,...0 0
"
o
""
"0; f/)
wO
",0
~~
.:::: 'n
"
"u ";j
" -
.."
"''''
",2 "a
~ ;:;
"''''
"rg "n "a ";j ;j
d..> d..> t) ti ti
O:::C::C::O:::e::
""
B
"
~
o
~
""
B
vi "c
" 0
o "
o "
'" ..
" ,
" "
-t:: dJ ...
o 5' &
:::: 0. '"
-g E ~
. ." ..
J"S< dJ J ='
f5 .= -:a 'iil ~
- ... ... - .,.; 0
c C dJ C C ::;
9: 9::;"g 9: 0
e '2 E e e -:
g "~ ~ 2. ~ ~ ~
dJ _ dJ =' d..> dJ ~
CiI t; CiI 8 0l.I e.o";;
'_~ 0. ~ ~ ~"~ '0
'" ~.......... c
~"E;j"E"E:
g-~i~~~
;j 6. g 0. 0.. 0
o;:::J.J::::l;:::J~
~
o
o
.c
'"
"
"
"
o
"
"
"
..
"
"
""
o
"
m
..
"
,;
1!
""
"
a
""
..
::0
:t.
~
00
-i
..,
'0
'"
<0
~,
0-
<0
co
'"
~
~
,
o
o
0,
~
"
"
vo
o
;;
'"
"" ~
~ ~ ti
::l ......:...:
'0 S ~
a a E
:;t '" dJl ~
Z H': ~
~~ ;:;'?
';'00
~ -
('I <"'I
".;-
00 -
N ."
"''''
<0 00
M <0
o\N
~ ."
N ."
"''''
.,.,. 'n
('"! c:
- N
~
2~
"0
uo
"E :;
~
"
~
";;
""
C
"
"g
ci.
'5
"
"
..
~
"
"
0.
o
U
U
o
""
B
~
~,
co
~ ~
o 0
o 0
.c '"
" "
" "
~ ci.-t::
Ci'l: 0
~ : ::
"" " ""
~ Q. d..>
t':I ",-:a
""05'8.
:3' ~ ~
~*
<0 00
~"7
."
00
-i
~
00
'"
co -
o ~
00...,:
~ ~
::~
'"
." ~
~ ~
O-;...t
~ 00
00 ~
"''''
0-
00
'"
~
."
'n
~ 00
r') t:
." -
';;:
o
o
o.
g~
~ 5.
,z
~
E
~
"-
~
o
us
"
u
C
"
'"
"
>
C
o
U
~
'" ~
" "
o "
.s%"
~V]
u "
5 E
VJ ~
~ 0
c &
'2.E
" "
~ E
o 0
u::c
>,>,
~"1:l
S .a
Or/)
U O.l
.... O.l
]=
"0 ~
UP-<
S
~
o
s
O.l
U
....
<8
"
~
:;:
'"
......
0,
<'l
u
"
~
'"
O.l
'(;j
'u
o
en
en
.0:;
o(l
iJ
.:::
o
,
O.l
'"
"1:l
"
E:::
o
-
o
<'l
iJ
S
O.l
;>
o
Z
CD
:J
"tl
CD
-.c
"tl CJ
CDCIJ
:J CD
r::: CD
:O::u.
r:::
o
CJ
-
-
CJ
C'(l
Co
E
~:;;
.0 CD
C'(l-
I-..!!:!
:J
CJ
C'(l
U
en
.....
"
"
~ >.
'"
'" " '" 6. ~ "
0 c 0 5 :3
" S- o " -;; Q. .~
~ " 5
" i " 0 >
;> " 0 " Q. .8 " '"
" " , "
-" Q. a " Q. 0
~ , " .c , 0 , "
-. c " ~ 0 a "
.. 0 Q. .c "
c -E " ^ ~ '" ;; ~
Q. Q. ~ Q.
= ~ , 5 " " 0
... 0 " .~ = 0 "
U 0 .g- .D 0 6.
oi G ,; ,; > " a "
~ e '" e 2 '" '@ '" e 5
oS 0 0 0 "
C 0 " 0 " 0 " 2 "
0 .~ , Q. ~ ~ " -ci Q.
~ e " e , 2 ;> ;> e " 0 e ,
= c c
. ~ ~ 6. -" -" 0 .
~ . " " ~ " ~ .c 0 " "
0 ~ 0 Q. 5 " " 0 " i3 0 Q.
" . " i3 . " . " " '" . "
00 -g 00 g 00 -t: -g 00 0 -g " 0
f 0 Q. E- o Q. .c = E- o
Q. Q. G C
~ "S " , " " 5 " " . '"
c '" c ~ " 0
'" '" ;; '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" .
" " . . ~ . " " 0 0 " . .
;; Q. ;; " " Q. ;; ;; ;; " ;; .c ;;
'" " <C '" '" ~ <C :< '" , '" " ." <C '" " 0 " "
Q. " Q. Q. Q. " Q. Q. Q. " Q. 0 0. ,
::J g i ;.:;J ::J Z Z :;;,) " ::J ::J ::J 0 Z Z ::J Z ::J 0
0 0 .c
b ~ 0'" '" '" 0 -, 0 0 '" '" o' '" ,0
. 0 0' o'
" -. i 0- r> Z. :2 '". .c 'T 'c. Z Z ~ 0- -
. .. ~ ,~ " "? ~ - '".
. =
~ =
. ...
.. U
" ~ :< '". ~ :< '" - ~ ~ '" :< - 00 ~
.. ~, c-! - c, 00 r! ~ ~ c
. " 00 z xi .. i Z "' 0: -, '" Z i 0' 0; ~
~ . - 0- r> c 0- 'T 'n - - ~
~ . .. ~ ~ 0 - .. ", - ~ -
= '" ~ ~ 'A N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U 'A
;; .c -. ~ .. 0 " 0- ~ " ~ 0- 0 0 r> 00
~ '" r-. if. '" ~ '" ~ ~ .. ~ ~ '" ~ c 0 - 'C
. ~ C " " -i "' 0: '" =' ,~
0 - r> r x ~, - ~ ~
= ... -~ - ,~ ~, '" 'T 'n .. ;;; " ~ .. -. ~ 'T - -
0. .., '" = 'T '/l ~ .. ~ ~ '" " 'T - '"' r> - ~ r>
.s @) . . 'A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
= '" -
= .. ~
~ .. '"
. .
Z 0 ~ ~
U .
..
~ 'T ~ 00 r> ~ - ~ 00 - '" ~ 0-
;; = '" r> ~ r> r> r> 0 - '" .~ ~ - ~ 0 0-
0 .~ - 0 ....-i r-i '" c '" - - '" - - '" C C
C ."
0 ~
." ;; .
. IE
= 0.
= 0 .
'" .. 0
U
'S >. >.
~ '- ~ " 0 0 '-:;; ~ ';n ':;;
::> , r .D .c ,
~ ~ 3 c ;; ;; 25 " "- . 25 c 25
. c ~ ~ ~ -;;:; ~ '5 -=: 0
~ C> C> C> > t C> C> C>
.. - - - - - " "' - - - - -
.s ~ ~
~
"
"
c
. ."
~ 0
::> 0 2
'" ':0 .c
c C f- ;;
~ :: " "
....J " E "
'" = .= " -;;; 0.
2 <5 if>
" '" " t; " x
" :3 0 "
" ~ -;; .::: c . 2 " " " .
" " <5 E '" " ;; " -;; , Ii:
'" '" " " -;;
if> 0 ~ , , 0 . en u 0 VO , -t:
~ e 0 '" Et ~ > " U 0 ~ 0
en 0 0 '" " " . ; .c "
, " E .D " -~ '" , 2 0-
>. > > '" .
" 0 2 " . '" = 0 , C t ;; '" .. " . ,
" . -" .= 3; ,
2 VO if> ~, f- a 0 . E t O€ .
E E .:;.;: -" "' "- ~ if> if> " ,;; .~
-B -;; " ,;, ~ 0 E
" 0 0 '" ", 5 S " , "
, " " 0 :i: " " " 0 'C 0
" 0:: "- OJ OJ 0 "- 0 0 if> <C -" c .J ~ '"
~ -
~
"
0)
'0
'",
~
o
"
...
o
~
"
0)
::l
~
0)
...
"
o
'0
0)
~
'"
..D
00
0)
:0
'"
f-<
S
o
cl::
"
~~
~ '00 ~
" 0) Jj
]~ V
..s~ ..s
.Q +-"
~ tl ~
E = 0..
~c2S
r.nkJ 8 {;5
~~ 0 -5
o 0 N "'El
~ u .,.~ V
o U g
-R CUlg.
.S '" 0) M
V e ~ 8
::0 Q) ...0 '""CI '""0
roC ~~c ~
r-- >. O)..s ro ~
'""O,.D > = S ~
C'"CI ..... () V ti-i
roO) u~'""O ~
r.tl:":::: V () 11)
0) 0.. 1:::: ....c: ro
~:B ~]~ 5
-a:::l V crJ.3 >-.
"s '3"~ i3
~ .~ ] ~ ~ ~
"S ,~ ~ ~"5 >. ~
ill it: 1)..r:::: 4--< "'!:;I OJ
~~ Q)<-'OZ~
Vl U ';.I,. c:: t:: U'J
~,... u ~.9 +-' "'2
~ .~ a ~ ~ ~ ..s
..8~ St)80)~
0:; ...........o............c:v
v 0....... C
O)g.<licOJ)~O)ro
::0 0.. 0.. g 8 c g ell
ro c;3 oo....c: ro'oo v
t-< = III U U CIl '"'r:::l G
'1J .~~ r.n I-. -;:: V v......
u.;: ::1 ~ ....."'0 blJ""CI
... "'0 - 8'S: " "
::Jct::ol-.Ocd...::l
a~.su~6:"5~
...-...~ ~,-..,-- ---
::::.~ C~~ z
o
"
if>
'"
"
'0
"
'"
s
OJ
'0
0)
.,s
~
0)
""
"
~
0)
~
"
'0
"
~
0)
.,s
~
0)
'"
"
'6
"
'0
@
oj
~
OIl
B
~
.~
0)
0)
""
-
o
-
~
'"
""
s
o
"
8
-
'3
"
!+1
"'"
'6
oJ
~
~
0)
-'"
'"
s
""
"
E
:::
"
"
>-
-
"
;:l -
0 r/J
U 0)
'" 0)
~ ....
-
"0 "
'"
U 0.
S
~
-
"
0)
~
u
'"
c8
"
u.l
:<
"
-l
U
<::
~
",'
0)
-
"
.~
u
o
if>
~
<
"do
"'-
0)0
.~ N
o [)
"..D
" P
"0
"
E=z
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 46 of 60
APPENDIX A
Inventory Details
~
o
-
C
QI
>
C
III
QI
:E
....
I
<(~
QlLL
.0-
C'Cl c
I- QI
E
QI
(,)
L-
o
-
c
w
::
C'Cl
..J
8...;;;
Cl ...-;;...,
e t -a
. ~ 0
o " .
_ 0 ~
=';~
S> :E
... ~
'"
:; lSou
-' 0
s=
o ;;.
...
"
So
:: -f:
:; ~
-
= "
" ~
...
g
aiI
~ "
~
~
, ~-
- "'.
t iii-~
~~ .
" 0 ~
c'tl fIl
"
...
"
- .
. 0
;. ~BlLl
1;1].5 .'l:::
"; 0 (I'J
~rf
e
; ti
!Eo.
O'::;O'::I'~~;;;-t
VlIA;;;:;::j~;;;;<AZ
:~
'f)
,.;
n
o
~
~;:;oo..,.
'::1', => ~:t,
~ ~ ~1 ~
;;;~""'Vl
o
'c.
:;;
'"
~
~
..,..=>00
:g, ~ ~.or
:$~:2~
~
~
~~~
~ 0 0 := 0 c. ..,. ~,
6.
e
"
...
~~
o 0
~ ~
F.- '-0 ,;::
<Xl 0 C
8
o
o
~~
"
= =
~
M
oor- "
cJ'oor---r
.--, :;;; 'C ~
'0
~
r;~
3';:::::;~
"1"-0..,.0
~ ""'"'; ~
o
~.
'r, 00 ~ (', t- t-- ::I'
:r~-~~1;.:t.~1
C'-O~OO'n,.....,_x
-n
~
-
'"
'"
...
e
s
e
,:; 0
'0 g
a "~
" ~:<
:z~
~ oj
:g-
~
~:i
" "
I~r~
zz
2 ,e c; ;::j
f-~.::r=
~ E E
~ ~ " ~
E a E
<':: 0:: " a
.....f-'--
UJ~UJl.;J
~
~~~~~
:."':-,;""'r;:
~I"I ~
::::2V1
m~
g g
~~
:; ::;
"''''
"
Q.
.
" " Z
g.g.>u
Z Z " ~
~ L: '-'
;:; ,,; Ll..' C.
~ ~z
,~~ ~ ~
;:; ~ ~ if.
"":l M -5 Vi
3cci2-
Z_:/l
:;;;..,...-,
,~ ..,. -
Q- "'T _
~ ~J
~3
"'~
~, c.
i:a:;;
,:: OJ
" "
?!,-;;;
a~
~ ~
2r:
g; ~ ~' ~ ;'; -:-:
Vl;;;:;~r;;:;.:Z
S?~
~;::
'::l' '..0
~ -
-~
~
Z< g.~'.-:(
,...., .c Z
~ 0
" -
~ ~
;~<~~;
'r, Z r-: 0".
co=t -t,
--.r- VlVl
~ ~
~~.-:(~~<(
c:c <'I Z t-- ::I' Z
,.....,:;;; 'n '"
0''--'1
~ M
~ ~
<'I ,0
=
~.-:(~'-O.-:(
02--Z
:=: ::.: ='
2;::6-1:~2<
-.-.2:2,O'Z
~ ;r, <: g:g!;j: .-:r::
-OZ"'-'ooz
~ ~ :;;' Q
~~~Sa~
~ "';;?::t ~-
'"
'lJ ;;!
~~
Zc:;
" .
J:
-'"
o
':;~
,- c
-, ~
" ~
"''''
,
v~~g
a 3 l":l c:::
:;00-,:;
g vi::
~ ~ g:3
.;: ~:;:: '-
~~~=
~
~
..,
0;
~
,
.;
~
~
o
"
-g
~
~
~
~ ~
~I~
';;:: ...1 ti
::: ~ ~
'" -
,,"
~ ~ 'S
c ~I,~
:S... I::l
~:t~
~~
..,~
~~
~~
<Cr--r--$;~$;
Z<.'l"""";:::;j""
~
.,
'f":
;;;
c
o
::::;,
~
00"'......"100.,.
.QQ'O'<o,<a......
-"'1!'"10 0_
,.., 0 0 ::0 0 0
~
~
~
c,
~
~
~
~
"
~
N
...... .r, 'r, '" 'n ......
......00000
r-- -NM'"
:u~?;~
z '" Oi oj
g~~ZZZ
~ ;3 ;3 ~ ~ ~
<';:';:Ui'liUi
:2
"
t..:..JCl..l
ZZ
~ ~
~?-
;;:; '" ;;:;
___:/lUlU')
"'"'T "''''1''''''''
"'T,-,- __
"'"'T"'T___
,~ ~
'"
'-' ~
~..:
~~
, Q
~:/l
_ M
It ~l
~-1:i "'I
';:'3"E~~
COCO.l:: ~
~':~
~ g ~ ~ ;3
lJ U 3 ~ :;
1> <l.IL.L..:.I1..1.
~I ~ ,-] 1::
~~'2~
V;~~E~
~
~
,,;
"
~
o
.,
;;;'
~
~:
~
"
.,
~
c,
.,
C
,..;
c,
~
.
"
::J
~
~
.;
~
~
~
..;
'"
I;;
~
.,
'"
"
o
I~
'"
I
o
.
.l;
,
'"
N
~
~
,,;
~
~
-i
~
~
~
,.:
N
'0
~
,,;
~
N
I~
I~
e
"
o .."
~ ~ ~I ~
: ~ ~ ~
~ "'T' ... ~
-~ ~ "':l
:;.~~~
~.- ';I~
~~~~
'"
l:;;Z
~....
~ ~
" ~
..,,,
r2~
.., ..,
~~
~
~
r"l 'u
oo~
=""
"
1;j
U
]
~
o
"
bJl
'"
'0
..s
~
'"
::l
cr'
~
"
-B
~
"
"
~
~
0.
"
...
;>;
"
::l
o
U
...
.~
'0
u
"
"
o Ei
:E ~
':; 0...
" "
'00
~ ~
e "
. Ei
, "
bJl
~ '"
~ iil
::E
~
~
'u
'"
~
;,;
2
::l
o
C/l
~
~
~
>
"
::l
OC/l
u"
"
~
~
~
'0
u
-
U
'"
0.
Ei
-
"
"
Ei
"
2
..s
"
I.I.l
"
'"
..-I
u
.s
'"
"
1;j
u
o
~
~
<(
o\io
... -
"0
.:::N
o a;
'.D
" ::l
'"
""
~
.::l
1-<;2.
s
ca E
'- -
o ~
<1J b/)
b/) ;:l
ro ~
" -
~ ]
~..g ,.Q
'" '" u
;:l <1J '"
0< A <1J
"'- '-
(\) ~ 0 0
.;3 00 V
<1J 0 b/)
rJl OJ) ~ S
-= oj ..- 0
~t;E~
~ ro ""CI IJ.)
0........... I1J l-;
0) ro ;..:::: ~
$-; ........ 0.. r:::r'
~.9 '.;j rJJ
B ~ ~ ;>.
= ....... S..o
OrJl.--]
U 5 N.....
~ <1JrJl S ].
~ Q)....... Vi
"0 l5.. ~ "3 .~
U iU "-" c.~
'- (1) l=l:-;:::
~Ol),,-.,u
B~c.s1"~ >.
sgg5B~
t:: 0 <.H ~ Q) 0
roU~'-"SU>.
8~~g2]~
"0 Vl ~~ 0 .~
~u'EbI)~U~5
s I-o~ 0 !:::: il.) ;..; - ,.....
~.~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ] ~
'" '" .D ;j A 8 '"
~ a ""CI ..o.~ 0.. co 8
::8"-~'8""-s::8
-0:: ";; '- "" -0:: <1J
."_g >>....; CIl OJ >0 ~ [i
~ t:: ""CI 0 ~ t:: '.-'"..;j
'u 8.;:;) g 'G & ~ :-:::
ro8s,...;@2gg
~~E~~~t)~
i)~e,o..~v~o.;
~ u r.n IZl ro 8. ..... e
;:l ~ ~ ~ IV ;:j ..=: :;j
OQuu$-;oroo
",,,,-o::-o:::a,,,>,,,
"
2
'"
"-
<1J
~
'"
<1J
-B
;:l
o
'"
b/)
;:l
:9
::;
.D
'-
o
;:l
o
€
o
"-
'"
i:i
<1J
'"
<1J
""
"-
e
0'
o
00
"''''
~]
0'"
U <1J
"" <1J
~~
--
o u
us.
S
-
i:i
<1J
5
u
""
c8
;:l
w
"
'"
..-l
'"
.D
""
<1J
""
.;;
'i3
~
~
'f)
s
~
-
~
N
<i:
b/)
.S
:2
':; >.
.D i:i
.r:: ;:l
u 0
ilu
'- il
0;..::::
<1J _
b/) 0
i3 u
""
u
'"
.B
i:i
<1J
S
1::
'"
"-
<1J
~
---,-..,.-.. --..
N(f')"T'-n
--'--"'--"--
~~~
\0 r-- 00
~~~
oS
;:l
-
'"
<1J
~
'[3
o
'"
'"
-0::
d<lo
""-
<1Jo
.:::N
o ~
, .D
~ S
"" !:
.S 0
~z
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 49 of 60
APPENDIX B
Building and Land Values
Supplemental Information
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 50 of 60
Building Value Estimates
In dctermining the appropriate unit value for buildings, the following analysis was
conducted:
. A review of recently built law enforcement buildings in Collier County;
. Insurance value of the existing inventory; and
. Discussions with architects.
The most recent construction oflaw enforcement buildings involved two buildings:
. The Special Operations Center, which was bid in 2006, and completed in 2008 for
a construction cost of approximately $254 per square foot and a total cost of $319
per square foot; and
. CCSO Fleet Maintenance Facility, which was bid in 2008, and completed in 2009
for a construction cost of approximately $205 per square foot, and a total cost of
$284 per square foot.
Given that these buildings were bid approximately two to four years ago, they do not
reflect the cost decrcases expcrienced over the past ycar or two.
Discussions with architects suggested a 10 to 20 percent decrease for constJuction costs
from 2006 bids, which provided a range 01'$200 to $230 per square foot for the Special
Operations Center and a range of $165 to $185 for the Fleet Maintenance Facility.
As presented in Appendix A, Table A-I, TOA evaluated the 2010 insurance values oflaw
enforcement buildings, which provided an average weighted construction cost of $236
per square foot for primary buildings and $73 per square foot for support buildings.
When a straight (unweightcd) averagc was calculated, the unit cost became $200 per
square foot for primary buildings and $74 per square foot for support buildings. It should
be noted that insurance values are considered to be a conscrvative estimate because
insurance companies exelude the value of the foundation and other more permanent parts
of the structure since they would not have to be rebuilt if the structure is damaged or lost.
Using the unit figures for primary buildings, the total building value was calculated and
prcscnted in Table B- I.
As shown in Tablc B-1, additional costs such as the site preparation, permitting,
professional services, etc. were added based on the ratio ofthese costs to construction
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2010
B-1
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 51 of 60
costs in the case of recently built facilities. This analysis provided a total building value
range of $270 to $318 per square foot. For impact fce calculations, the low end of this
range, or $270 per square toot, is used for primary buildings. For support facilities, based
011 the insurancc values, $75 per squarc foot is lIscd.
Table B-1
Law Enforcement Buildings
Total Building Value per Square Foot
Cost per Square Cost per Square .. ....
Building Cost Component Foot (Weighted Ins Foot (Straight Percent
Value) . Avg Ins Value) .' Add;d(4
Construction Cost( I J $236 $200
Site preparation(2) $35 $30 15.0%
Other(3) $47 $40 20.0%
Total $318 $270
(1) Source: Insurancc valucs of cxisting buildings
(2) The ratio of sitc preparation cost to the constl11ction cost is determincd based on recently
built law enforccment buildings. Cost per square foot is calculaled by applying the ratio
10 the construction (e.g., $236 x .15 ~ $35 for primary buildings).
(3) Thc ratio other costs to the construction cost is detennined based on recently built law
enforcement buildings. Cost per square foot is calculated by applying the ratio 10 the
constl11ction (e.g., $236 x .20 ~ $47 for primary buildings).
(4) Additional pcrcentagc I()r indicatcd costs based on reccntly buill buildings
Land Value Estimates
In order to detcrmine land value associated with law enforcemcnt buildings, the
following information was evaluated:
· Current value of land where law cnforccment buildings are located;
· Land value in areas where future law cnf()J'cement buildings are planncd to be
located;
· Vacant land sales analysis: and
. Land use charactcristics of arcas where law enforcemcnt facilities are located.
Tindale-Olivcr & Associatcs, Inc.
November 20 10
B-2
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 52 of 60
Based on the Collier County Property Appraiser database, the current average value of
land where existing law enforccment buildings are located is approximately $170,000,
which is shown in Appendix A, Table A-l.
There are two law enforcemcnt buildings that are planncd for the future. One of these
will be locatcd in the Big Corkscrew Fire District and thc other in the East Naples Fire
District. In addition, only about 25 percent of law enforcement buildings are located in
residential areas while the rest is located in more commercial areas or areas with mixed
uses. An evaluation of the vacant residential versus commercial land values for I to 10-
acre parcels in thcse two districts resulted in an avcrage land value of $42,000 per acre
for residential land uses, and $230,000 per acre for commercial land uses. This
information is presentcd in Table B-2.
Table B-2
2010 Vacant Land Values(1)
2010 JustiV~I~e of AU.' .
Vacant Parcels 1 to 10 acreS
Residential Commercial
$66,332 $320,845
$17,804 $139,503
$42,068 $230,174
(1) Sourcc: Property Appraiser, Collier County
Area
Resulting average values for residential and cOlmnercial parcels are weighted using the
current combination of parcels (25 percent residential and 75 percent commercial) as well
as by using a more conservative ratio of 40 percent residential and 60 percent
commercial. As presented in Table B-3, this analysis resulting in a value ranging from
$ I 55,000 to $185,000. Givcn that the current value of land where existing parcels is
within this range, an averagc valuc of $170,000 per acrc is used in the impact fee
calculations. This figure is also consistent with the sales prices of I to 1 a-acre vacant
parcels in these districts.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, lUG.
November 2010
B-3
Collier County
Law Enforccment Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. 8E
December 14, 2010
Page 53 of 60
Table B-3
Estimated Land Value(1)
.
Land Use Type Distribution(l) Land Value per Distribution(3) LandvlIlne per
Acre(2) y A . (2),C;,'.
I .C . ~"'~::i,::~:::,:ji.ti
Residential 25% $42,000 40% $42,000
Commercial 75% $230.000 60% $230,000
Wcighted Average Land Valuc,"j $183,000 $154,800
(I) Bascd on the existing mix of land uses where law enforcement facilities are located
(2) Source: Table B-2
(3) A hypothetical distribution that would provide a more conservative approach
(4) Average calculatcd bascd on the distribution and land value of each land use
TindaJe-Oliver & Associates, fnc.
November 2010
8-4
Collier County
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 54 of 60
DRAFT
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE TEN
LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE - PHASE I
Effective July 27, 2009 December 20, 2010
Impact Fce Land Use Category
Residential
Assisted LivID!! Facilitv
Mobile Home
Multi-Family
Single Family
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
1,500102,499 sq. fl.
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
Non-Residential
Auto Sales (Luxurv)
Auto Sales (NewlUsed)
Bank/Savings: Drive-In
Bank/Savings: Walk-In
Business Park
Car Wash - Automated
Car Wash - Self-Service
Church
Callege JURiar'CsffiffluBiry
Callege URi\'eFSitj'
College/Universitv
7 500 snldents or fewer
Greater than 7.500 students
Convenience Store (24 hours)
Convenience Store with Gas pumps
Day Care
Furniture Store
Gasoline/Service Station
Golf Course
Home Improvement Store
Hospital
Hotel IMelel
Rate
liilll Per Dwellinll Unit
~ $191.75 Per Dwelling UniUSite
~ lliUl Pcr Dwelling Unit
~ $247.47 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $269.50 Pcr Dwelling Unit
~ $298.00 Per Dwclling Unit
$143.81 Per 1 000 sa. fl.
~ $221.56 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
~ $295.40 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
~ $332.98 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
~ $128.27 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
$208.60 Per I 000 so. ft.
~ $79.03 Per Service Bay
$9H3 $73.8~ Per 1,000 sq. fl.
~ Per Emeeat
Wc% Per S~aaeRt
$12.95 Per Student
$9.07 Per Studcnt
$8'I4M $708.71 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
$1,268.03 $563.60 Per Fuel Position
~ $648 Per Student
llLlQ Per 1 000 s<Lil
~ $25654 Per Fuel Position
~+"H $251871 Per 18 Holes
W4M $230.62 Per 1,000 sq. ft
~ $200.83 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
~ $95.8~ Per Room
Underlined text is added; Stme!( t1.re\:lgR text is deleted
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 55 of 60
DRAFT
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Industrial ~ General Light $~H $8940 Per 1,000 sq. H.
Marina ~ $24.62 Per Berth
Mini~Warehouse nu& WI Per 1,000 sq. H.
Molel H~ULQ Per Room
Movie Theater $9&(W+ $774.79 Pcr Screen
Nursing Home $J.'&9Q $93.29 Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq ft. or less ~ $183.98 Per 1,000 sq. H.
Omee 50,001-100,000 sq. H. $J.9.>,M $156"77 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001-200,000 sq. ft. $J.6<ffl$ $133.4~ Pcr 1,000 sq, H.
Office 200,001-400.000 sq. ft. lrt4.~ $11402 Per 1,000 sq. H.
Office Greater thaJ.l 400,000 sq ft. ~ $lill65 Per 1,000 sq fl.
Office ~ Medical mH. lli285 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Pharmacy/Drug Store $4lS+> $250.06 Pcr 1,000 sq. fl.
Quick Lube n99d+ $150 29 Pcr Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food \v/Drive-ln ;;!,OO+.++ 11,167.37 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - I Iigh Tumovcr ~~ $34.9~ Per 1 ,QQg flfj ft. Seat
Restaurant - Qualjty $1,44Ji.-M $28.51 Per 1,099 st:(. ft. Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less ~J 1.3J743 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001-100,000 Sq. Fe. ~ lilJl73 Per 1,000 sq. n.
Retail 100,001-150,000 Sq. Ft. ~ $291.52 Per 1,000 sq Il.
Retail 150,001.200,000 Sq. Fl. $,4&&8 $356.30 Per 1,000 sq. H.
RelaiI200,001-400,000 Sq. Ft WM+ 1.3Qill Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001-600,000 Sq Ft. $494,>4 lliUJ. Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001-1,000,000 Sq. Ft. $49(),')lJ l.3ll5.1 Per J ,000 sq ft.
Retail >1,000,000 Sq Ft. $4JH2 $270.79 Per 1,000 sq ft.
Retail - Specialty ~ ~21896 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
RV Park $69.97 Per Site
School- Elementary (Private) ~ $.778 Per Student
School. Middle (Private) $+M2 $9.07 Per Student
School - High School (Private) $21cB $10.3, Per Student
Supermarket W+-U $26561 Per 1,000 sq ft.
Tire Store m'c<1 .$L73.62 Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; Struek tJ.mllsfl text is deleted
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 56 of 60
DRAFT
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE TEN
LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE - PHASE I!
Effective December 20,:WW 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Residential
Assisted Living Facility WHl $153.75 Per Dwelling Unit
Mobile Home ~ $255.67 Per Dwelling Unit/Site
MultiMFamily U4HI- $193.48 Pcr Dwelling Unit
Single Family
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. W+4+ $32996 Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. ~ $359.33 Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger ~ $39733 Per Dwelling Unit
Non-Residential
Auto Sales (Luxury) ~ $191.75 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Auto Sales (NewlUsed) ~ $295.41 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Drive-In ~ $393.87 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Walk-In ~ $443.2.a Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Business Park $m4+ $17102 Per 1,000 sq ft.
Car Wash - Automated ~ $278.13 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Self-Service ~ $10538 Per Service Bay
Church ~ $98.47 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
College/University
7,500 studenls or fewer ~ $17.27 Per Student
Greater than 7,500 students ~ llUQ Per Student
Convenience Store (24 hours) ~ $944.95 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store with Gas pumps ~ $751.47 Per Fuel Position
Day Care !64& $864 Per Student
Furniture Store $3+-W $41.46 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Gasoline/Service Station ~ $342.05 Per Fuel Position
Golf Course $2,518. 72 $335830 Per 18 Holes
Home Improvement Store ~ $307.50 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital ~ $267.77 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel ~ $127.84 Per Room
Underlined text is added; Stll;!.el. tlueHgh text is deleted
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14 2010
Page 57 of 60
DRAFT
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Industrial - General Light WMlJ $119.20 Per 1,000 sq_ ft.
Marina $;!+e;! $32.82 Per Berth
Mini-Warehouse $'WI illJQ Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Motel $&94lJ $119.20 Per Room
Movie Theater $-7f4-19 $1033.06 Per Screen
Nursing Home m,;w $124.38 Pcr Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less $+8~ $245.3J) Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Office 50,001-100,000 sq. n. ~H $20903 Per 1,000 sq n.
Office 100,001-200,000 sq. It. $H~ $177.94 Per 1,000 sq. n.
Office 200,001-400,000 sq. n. $J..!4m $li:) 02 Per 1,000 sq. n.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq, It $+~ $13820 Per 1,000 sq. n.
Office - Medical ~ $297J..1 Per J ,000 sq. n.
PhannacylDrug Store ~oOe $333.41 Per 1,000 sq. ft
Quick Lube $.J->0.-29 $200.39 Pcr Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive-IIl $.J,l6H7 $1 556.50 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Restaurant. High Turnover $J4")8 $46.64 Pcr Seat
Restaurant - Quality $<&1+ ~38.01 Per Scat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less $:H.M3 $4232-1 Per 1,000 sq n.
Rela,150,001-100.000 Sq. ft ~1-lhH $424.97 Per] ,000 sq. n.
Retail 100,001-150,000 Sq. Ft. $;!~ $38870 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001-200,000 Sq. Ft ~.-31l $ill~01 Per 1,000 sq. It.
Retail 200,001-400,000 Sq. Ft ~ $40424 Per] ,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001-600,000 Sq. Ft ~H $421.51 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Retail 600.00 I-I ,000,000 Sq. Ft UH+I $418.QQ Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft. WiH9 $36105 Per 1,000 sq ft.
Retail - Specialty ~ $29195 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
RV Park ~ $93.29 Per Site
SchooI- Elementary (Private) $+'1-8 $1037 Per Student
School ~ Middle (Private) S9o!l+ illJ.Q Per Student
School- High School (Private) ~ $13.82 Pcr Student
Supermarket $;!6MH- $354.14 Pcr 1.000 sq. fl.
Tirc Store ~ $23149 Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; ~ text is deleted
DRAFT
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE TEN
LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE - PHASE II!
Impact Fer Land Use Category
Residentill
Assisted Living Facility
Mobile Home
Multi-Family
Single Family
Less than 1,500 sq, ft.
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
Non-Residential
Auto Sales (Luxury)
Auto Sales (New/Used)
Bank/Savings: Drive-In
Bank/Savings: Walk-In
Business Park
Car Wash - Automated
Car Wash - Self~Service
Church
CollegelUniversity
7,500 students or fewer
Greater than 7,500 students
Convenience Store (24 hours)
Convenience Store with Gas pumps
Day Care
Furniture Store
Gasoline/Service Station
Golf Course
Home Improvement Store
Hospital
Ilotel
Effective December 20,:W14 2012
Rate
~ $192.19 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $319.59 Per Dwelling Unit/Site
~ $241.85 Per Dwelling Unit
W9o% ffi2.45 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $449.16 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $496.66 Per Dwelling Unit
~ $239.69 Per 1.000 sq. ft.
~ $369.26 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $492.34 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $554.97 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $213.78 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
W&H $347.66 Per 1,000 sq. 1\.
~ $131.72 Per Service Bay
m4'I $123.09 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $21.59 Per Student
$.~ lliJ.l Per Student
$944J)> $1.181.19 Per 1,000 sq. ft
m+4+ $939.34 Per Fuel Position
~ $10.80 Per Student
W46 $51.83 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $427.56 Per Fuel Position
$3,35839 $4197.87 Per 18 Holes
~ $384.37 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
~ $33471 Pcr 1,000 sq. ft.
W+S4 $159.80 Per Room
Underlined text is added; 8trl:lsiE tkrel;lgH text is deleted
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 58 of 60
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 59 of 60
DRAFT
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Industrial ~ General Light ~ $149.00 Per 1,000 sq_ It.
Marina ~ $4103 Per Berth
Mini-Warehouse ~ $15.J1 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel ~,w ll19 00 Per Room
Movie Theater ~6 ill9U2 Per Screen
Nursing Home ~ $15548 Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less ~'ll) $306.63 Per J ,000 sq. ft.
Offiee 50,001-100,000 sq. fl $;)gJ),G; $261.29 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Omee 100,001-200,000 sq. ft. WM4 $22242 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001-400,000 sq. fl. ~~:! $19003 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft. ~ $172.75 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Office. Medical mH4 illlAI Per 1,000 sq. ft.
PharmacylDrug Store WHI ~JQ76 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Quick Lube ~ $25049 Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive-In u,.m,w $.).945.62 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Restaurant - High Turnover $46M $58.3Q Per Seat
Restaurant - Quality ~ $47.51 Per Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft or Less ~ lli9.05 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Reta>i 50,1101-100,000 Sq. Ft. ~ llilli Per ],000 sq. ft.
Reta>i 100,0111-150,000 Sq. Ft. :R&&,+l) $48587 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Reta>i 150,001-200,000 Sq. Ft. WW7 $593.84 Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Retail 200,1101-400,000 Sq. Ft. ~ .i505l0 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001-6011,000 Sq. Ft. :>42-b>+ $526.89 Per 1,0011 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001-1,000.000 Sq Ft. $4+&,{)6 $52251 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail > 1 ,000,000 Sq. P1. ~ $45Ul Per 1,000 sq. fl.
Retail. Specialty ~ $364 91 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
RV Park YJ~ :llitUU Per Site
School- Elementary (Private) ;+(8.1 lli3.ii Per Student
Scl1ool- Middle (Private) ~ lliJ1 Per Student
School- High School (Private) m,&;! $17.28 Per Student
Supcnllarket W4,.I4 $442.68 Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store $~ $289 J11 Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; 8trneh iliFAligA text is deleted
fir
Agenda Item No. BE
December 14, 2010
Page 60 of 60
20D · Saturday, December 4, 2010 . Naples Daily News
Legals
Legals
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER
ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on Tues-
day, December 14, 2010, in the Board-
room, 3rd Floor, Administration Build-
ing, Collier County Government Cen-
ter, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples,
florida, the Board of C;ounty Commis-
sioners will consider the enactment of
a County Ordinance. The meeting will
commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of
the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAP-
TER 74 OF THE COlliER COUNTY
CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
(THE COlliER COUNTY CONSOLI-
DATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCEIBY
INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THE
"COLLIER COUNTY lAW ENFORCE-
MENT IMPACT FEE STUDY FINAL RE-
,POR"!{ '/\~E!'IDINc:; TH~. LAW EN-
FORCEMENJ' IMPACT FEE RATE SCHED.
UlE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE TEN OF AP-
PENDIX . A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FINDINGS' OF THE UPDATE STUDY;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVE-
RABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION
IN THE COlLIER COUNTY CODE OF
LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PRO-
VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Copies of the proposed Ordinance are
on fIll;! with the Clerk to the Board and
are available for inspection. All inter-
ested parties are invited to attend and
be heard;
NOTE: All persons, wishin~ to ~peak
on any ager:tdfl item must register with
the County administrator prior to pre-
sentation of the agenda item to be
addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 3 minutes on any item. The
selection of an individual to speak on
behalf of. an organization or group is
encouragea. If recognized by the
Chairman,. a spokesperson for a group
or organization may be allotted ,10
minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing ,to have written or
graphic materials included in the
Board agenda packets must submit
said material a minimum of 3 weeks
prior to the respective public hearing.
In any case, written materials intended
to be considered by the Board shall be
submitted to the appropriate County
staff a minimum of seven days prior to
the public hearing. All material used
in presentations before the Board will
become a permanent part of the re-
cord.
Any person who decides to appeal a
decision of the Board will need a re-
cord of the proceedings ,pertaining
thereto and therefore, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record in-
cludes the testimony and ""evidence
upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability
who needs any accommodation. in or-
der to participate in this proceeding;
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to
the provision of certain aSSIStance.
Please contact the Collier County Fa.
cilities Management Department, 10.
cated at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,
Building W, Naples, Florida 34112,
{239l 252-8380, Assisted listening de-
vices for. the hearing impaired are
available in the County CQI1U1)issioners'
Office. .,;:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
[)prpmhpr 4th 7010
No 1R7q7H