Loading...
Agenda 12/14/2010 Item # 8C f\qenda Item No 8e December 14, 2010 Page 1 of 64 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve Remedial Amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to implement a previously approved Compliance Agreement between the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Collier County, including Petitioners-in-Intervention, pertaining to Section 24 in North Belle Meade. OBJECTIVE: For the 80ard of County Commissioners (BCC) to rcview and approve petition CPR-201O-4 consisting of remedial amcndmcnts to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to implement a Partial Stipulated Settlement Agrecment (Compliance Agreement) between the Florida Department of Community Aflilirs (DCA), Collier County, and Petitioners-in- Intervention Florida Wildlifc Federation. Collier Audubon Society, Buckley Enterptises, Hideout Golf Club, Ltd, and John L. Cowan and Jane Ann Cowan, Trustees, and approve its transmittal to the DC A, CONSIDERATIONS: [n January 2007. thc Board adopted amendments to the GMP that included retaining the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands designation for Section 24 (Township 49 South. Range 26 East) in the North Belle Mead Overlay (NBMO) but imposing greater habitat protcction standards and use restrictions, via text provisions, than would apply to other Neutral Lands; this designation jor Section 24 has cOllle to be refen'ed to as "enhanced Neutral." After reviewing the adopted amendmcnts pertaining to Section 24. tbe DCA issued its detennination in May 2007 that those amendmcnts were not in compliance with state law, (The only other amendments !i)Und to bc not in compliance pertained to th" Capital Improvement Element; those amendments were the subject of a previously approved partial stipulated settlement agreement. and subsequently adoptcd remedial amendments.) Tbe Florida Wildlife Federation and Collier County Audubon Socicty intervened on behalf of DCA; Buckley Enterprises, Hideout Golf Club, Ltd. and John L. Cowan and Jane Ann Cowan, Trustees (three owners of propetiy in Section 24). intervened on behalf of Collier County, All parties participated in settlement discussions. supported continued abcyanec of the pending case at the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH). tinally rcached agreement on settlement tenns, and the Board approved a Compliance Agreement on September 28, 20 I O. The Agreement was approved by DCA (the final party to sign) on Octobcr 18, 2010. and Recorded by the Collier County Clerk on November 1, 20 I 0, Section 24 contains approximately (,51 acres and is comprised of 244 tax parcels. The three intervener property owners plus Collier County own I <) or those parcels but account Jor 431 acres, or 66% of the acreage in Section 24. Tht. remaining 225 parccls account for the remaining 220 acres. Ofthosc 225 parcels, only thrcc parcels arc 10 acres or larger in size; Ji)Ur parcels are between about 5 and 8 aercs; the balancc are less than 5 acres, most being :::1 acre, The relevance of these parcel sizcs is tbat tbe dcnsity limitations approved in tbe settlement agreement and ineludcd in tbese remedial amendments sbould have minimal impact; on Iv the owners o{'the three _/ I)-acre parcels would be slIbject to a density reduction as all other parcels are presently only eligiblc for one dwelling unit (based Oil density of I DU/5 acres or per legal nonconforming lot). For those three owncrs, their properties arc subject to a density reduction - /\q<:?ndCJ lteln l\jo. He; Decernbf:i14, 201 C f"lage ;2 01 G4 without compensation. Staft' was unsuccessful in an attempt to havc thc Agreement include an allowancc for those three parccls to retain the residential density of I DlI/5 acres, One of those three parccls (:!:.16 acrcs) is undeveloped and wooded; one parecl (:1::10 acres) contains a singlc lumily residence; the third parcel (:!:.2h acres) contains a plant nursery. It is unknown whether those owners will pursue developmcnt. or lurther development. of their properties with residential use and, it' so. when, For the property owned by the three property owner intervcners. the approved Agreement and these remedial ammdments limit their density thc samc as f()r all other properties (IOU/parcel) unless they choose to cluster their [JUs. in which case density is I DU/5 acrcs; this density increase is their incentive to cluster. However, when clustering. there is a greater native vegetation retention requirement; the project is subject to clustering standards in the Future Land Use Element and Land Development Code; there is a requirement to participate in a red- eoekaded woodpecker habitat management plan; and, thc developer must pursue a "safe harbor agreement" with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which, if successful, will trigger a financial commitment jj-OITl the developer to implement the associated red-coekaded woodpecker habitat managemcnt plan. Only the interveners' property ownership is large enough to cluster, given the 64-aere minimum size requirement. Bclow is a density comparison fl)r the intervener properties with and without clustering, Hideout Cowan Bueklev Sum Without Clustering 3 DUs' 6DUs h DUs 15DUs With Clustering 37 DUs IlJ nus 16 DUs 72 DUs * No nus assigned to existing Hideout gol r course development or the two parcels for which no development is allowed. Under the approved settlelTlent agreement and these remedial amendments, j{)r all 244 parcels in Seetion 24. a total of 240 DUs may be developed without clustering (no DUs assigned to golf course property. County property, or two parcels for which no development is allowed) and 302 DUs with clustering (no DUs generated Irom County propelly); the dinerenee is 58 DUs. In the event of clustering, the native vegetation retention requirement is 80'Yo. However, if DUs are not clustered. there is no broad vegetation retention requircment. rather only a requirement to retain lJO'Y" of the slash pine trees on site, FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this petition will necessitate subsequent preparation of related Land Development Code amendments. Costs associated with the amendments (primarily, staff time) are prcsently budgeted. Additionally. because approval ofthis petition containing remedial GMP amendments will, if j()und "in compliance" and not challenged. settle the case pending at DOAH. lt will save the County the [not quantiJiedJ expense of preparing j{lr, and participating in, the administrative hearing (there is no certainty of the outcome of such hearing nor subsequent aetion by DCA or the Administration Commission. as applicable), 7 i\nencln Iteni f\j(: 8e Uecernnml.:1,2()'10 PaUE: 3 01 ClL1 GI{OWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Adoption of this petItIon eonslstmg of remedial GMP amendments would resolve the remainmg outstanding non-eomphanee issues from the May 2007 Statement of Intent li'OIn DCA. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: On Septemher 28, 2010, the BCC approved a Partial Stipulated Settlement Agreement I"r the Division of Administrative Hearing case initiated hy the DCA who j'JUnu the amendments relative to Section 24 Not in Compliance. The DCA approved the Agreement on Oetoher 18. 20 I O. The Agreement ineludes a requirement that the implcmenting remcdial GMP amcndments be adopteu within 60 days aileI' approval [hy DCA. the final party to signJ. The Board's Deccmher 14.2010 hearing is within 60 days of the DCA's approval of the Agrecment. The remedial amendments in this petition retleet the terms set f(lrth in Exhihit B to the Agreement. If these remedial amendmcnts arc auopted, t'JUnu to be'''in compliance" with Florida Statutes hy the DCA, and the 21-day challenge period enus without a challenge to that compliance determination. then that part of the DOAH case. which is all that remains, will he dismissed, - STW RECOMMENDATION: That the Boaru approves petition CPR-20 I 0-4. therehy auopting remedial amcndmcnts to the GMP, anu its transmittal to the DCA Prepareu hy: David Weeks. AICP, GMP Manager. Comprehensive Planning Section, Lanu Development Services Department. Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation Attachments: I) NBMO Map; 2) Exeeuteu and Reeordeu Second Partial Stipulated Settlement Agreement; 3) Ordinance; 4) Ordinance Exhihit A. Future Lanu Use Element text; 5) Oruinanee Exhibit A. Conservation and Coastal Management Element text; 6) Ordinance Exhibit A, NBMO Section 24 Map EXSUM CPR-2010-4 Remedial Amendmenl- See 24 settlement agreement G:\ComprehensiveICOMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2009.2010 Combined Cycles petitionsl2010 Cycle Petitions\CPR-2010-4 Sec, 24 Compliance Agreement-based dw/11-18-10 3 Item Number: Item Summary: Meeting Date: (~UC!!I(j;': ILenl [-~() He [Jecl:;lT1ber '14,2010 F'a[Jc, ,1 of (;4 COLLIER COUNTY uun! ~)r\j'liVil;:-:;:~I(JI'J~: n;; II[ i(!;\ti'. iF It, i<()iiH'jj(,! /-\!nf':ld!ll"llt:~ 10 the C:,!Owtll ['vlanam~menl Plan, Iii: !lll {i "i'ii'lll.iui, ;r) illlI'!<:-'lllfcn! ,IIJI, viUU~;ly' anJllwed CC)lrlpliallUJ Agreemenl IJ' !,I<I",'j' 'i,L [ir ~I(id LI.~r<Jt11!I(';n (I: COIiIl1HwiJ'\" i\lt:-lll'; 8m] t.\lllie, County. includillQ !lli'll\' .illll)! .'IV'.Jlil ill. pCllailllllq lli S"..:;il!lli ~'.(-; ill I~ollh belle f\i'lc;J(jc; :'i I ')/,:1) i ~_ ' :1 'J\: {Iii [\1",/1 Prepared By Uavid VVepk~" /i,!,' f- COllltnllllit,/ !Y'v')IOlllHf?lll F:Il\rjl(HlnH"nt~11 Sf'f'lllce" r,';;lIEHW; Plan!linn DatE f:ompn'llf>tl,;cj\If.' Pi:1!ll)lll{! ilI18/2C1104:2U:12 PM Approved By ,Juoy Puj~i Comrnllllitv Dnv'-~I(Jpllluli t Ellvjrl.)!lnlpnl;:;1 ~:;!'r',riCE' ()peratiol L:; j\ ltalYs! LJate LUlnllltlllll'.i IJ'.:veIO!lln(ill t [-livil olHlfPn~,;ll ~;cPiiq!<; i1fHI/20ilJ 4:22 PM Approved By Nicl\ Casalanquidi1 Trdllspollatinn Ui\!j~,jorl Dilocl0: '1 ri-lrlSpc.rtilti;1I1 PI;mninq Date 'r r,ml:ponatitHi rL11111iIH~ 1 'j/19l2010 2:2(j PM Apllroved By :;teven William!'. C;')\JIlly j\ttornl"\i 1~_5sj;;j,m( County' At1:oln'~\' Dato C,OHJd_\.' i\Hoilrf>J n/Hlf2010 2:27 PM Approved By \/\iPli;ml [) LrHclr "II COlnrnllllit~' f)pv','IOPl1JC'nl: [;. EI1VinHlIllental $0fvicn<:, L!1I::::iul '~_:fJ~-' ~n~B11'; 'lillU br,e'IViCP!O {Iatc Lll!Jin'c"tljHlg :[" t:rwilnlllllcllt;:d Services '11120/20-1010;59 AM AplJroved By ['Jonn [r:'pdt,~ MC~P lri1llsporta1ioll [jjllisim; i'.<i1t1l11i:-;!I;-,tOI - Tr.3Ii"HHdti1ti0I1 Datp Approved By i r;lIl:,d}l!1 J;:-.lii'l1 AdIHllll~;!i'''-ltinn j 1fnr2010 9:56 AM {JME f.~n(iniill;3Ir COll11!\i ril!l1l;c;qPl'. (Hli~_" [)at~ ()iiii^ I:: rJii!IL1~i"'lneqt r 8ud(w' '1U:::2f2UHI1-1:D AM Approved By J{'H 1\!aI2hH" 'lUll("' ,",1!U'TI':' Uail.' Approved By 1 ~.'II /201 (I H~46 AM r ~ leI":';! ::: l:111ic. I, TI;"~:' ~, :"lIV l)aH 'ii" ihc~" :'~!i;i;, ~)rjjc' (,' !\!J;..n"W('II1";'tI ':: '}fill-' ,or :Vi":'t;"I(li~nlc;!lt \:\11;1 r:1':: ':11;,1" Approved By :!;!' i'-i::iFiIl'" "!H ()'llji" r'itllh'II' I <)H- (Ij I' 11 L,t;~1 1<:1 WI "1 i'; l2/'lJ2010 :::3~-) prVI flaiL 1;:'J-1J:!.UlO b:V PI\'; /\(Jenclcl Ilern l\io 8e Lleccrnher 1", 20'1() Pane 5 of Ci4 00"" co~<D 0_ ON 0 Z~'<D F""'" a.;, , } =- ..L "'>= TI- C (\J (\Jas ~)O '--'--"--'---;--~--'-'I ..---~ I Ii! I ~ I ! I ~ (, ~ I' ~ c;-c c- o '_r~ ~~) I UJ' ",. ,m,. I ~ ~~!~,~~. . ~ ~~ --- - ~ ltl ~ ~ I ~ I:: " CI) i~i~~! E5 "-, _L_=~ '-..:-:'1----.- -1-__ ~ , I ~ i '@'v'fnn~8 ~:IaV;9~:Ir:l c. ! ~ /~~ / i---i-/:-Ol"~-T--~-------:. . ~ i/ - ~ i ,., r~iJi.}'I. ......1 w ---@ --;-----1'....'./)".-. r---:'-c-;~-+~-. ;~~.I~ > ----~ic""':'."'ij:.<"r' ...... 'I ~ i = 11":":':':.:'>-:::/>.;:1' j ~ o "'<( './'1/1.. " ". 1 s,"', 2: W (!) I. . 1 /'. ". . ". . -+ ~ " :ic I"I_--~ffi +-----r{;.'"---=J.'--'--'-c--~="'I... ;g- 17H~ 01 ' ., ~~ <5 '1 i> I . .... '..~~' '..1 <; 0:: I' " :E I (!) i -! . .... "".J-,,-,-:,'2~ . ......., ~ ~ W '.--J--' !-f-:"-~--~+-'''-:=1--+-- --- I~ ~ &~ ~ 1- i- ~-,. '1./'NPI~N3;;jCll\~8N6S.1!M. i -.__..:. it i!1 "" ".." W - ,''1V11J)lf~d oj ',f ..... :;>-'7 ::j - , [.'/;1 Rl 1 I . I.. ../ / I, '<( I~.:.J LJ Ie +__. .-,-l__L.,,_L~~_ .' "j'. ./ /-tZ//</ ~_-.I I' '. J: \------ Ii! . -- -'//I,/i. ~ I l J t: \ : I ! '1/(<1/'" .... 3" I ---- ~ '1__ i----LII ---- ,.J iF4~~~'"--"7 -~-----! c . 'j I 5 I ~ '0.. 6!7> 0 I ~~!l \.... \~ ~. i.:f~iiJ~?: I ' !II ILi}~~I___--;- I;--jl : ~ m i , ,_" i t- ~ ~~~ , I ~3 c;JW ~.;:; i.,~g z~ ~~= '-'~... <1:':'", ,,_ .~, w !~ c ~ "'LL !!5 1_ ~~ Gg I----~.- ;~~ I i i ~ \_~~--_/----/----- --I I ~ ~ I -'-1 I ::;8 6 ~ ':,-0; w;;, ~ I ':::: ,~, ?'-~ i:<: ~ ~' 8~ ~ ,:::, " " " W ~~ " +-------1 , , I 1--- I I ! , I I .--- i I ...1 I I Ww ~E Lo ..... . ~; I - -' I / '-"(", ",:'/) ,:,lLJ - D ~ ~ ~ r') I , , ......_-~ li:>! I I " "c> ~ ~ t1' " Z --~-- " I -.J ~ ~ i , ! ({96 'tJ'J) i c "',. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS _-I ::::; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, .- ~ r--;-'- i".J ~ :-- ..-1-" ,:'U'_\ '. --1 Petitioners. , , ;.-)11 c) and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION and COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY INSTR 4491141 OR 4619 PG 1652 RECORDED 11/1/20102:40 PM PAGES 35 DWIGHT E. BROCK COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT REC $299.00 Petitioners- in- Intervention v. DOAH Case No, 07-23 I 7GM COLLIER COUNTY Respondent and BUCKLEY ENTERPRISES, HIDEOUT GOLF CLUB, L TO, JOHN L. COW AN and JANE ANN COWAN, TRUSTEES, Respondents- in- In tervention. I SECOND PARTIAL STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs; Petitioners-in-Intervention Florida Wildlife Federation and Collier County Audubon Society; Respondent Collier County; Respondents-in- Intervention Buckley Enterprises. Hideout Golf Club. L TO, and John L. Cowan and Jane Ann Cowan, Trustees, as a complete and final settlement of all claims related to Ordinance No. 07-18 raised in the above-styled proceeding. RECITALS WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs (DCA or Department), is the state land planning agency and has the authority to administer and enforce the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Collier County (Local Government) is a local government with the duty to adopt comprehensive plan amendments that are "in compliance;" and WHEREAS, the Local Government adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendment 07-1 ER (Plan Amendment) by Ordinance Nos. 07-18 on January 25, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Plan Amendment proposes changes to the Future Land Use Map and the Future Land Use Element as it pertains to Section 24; and WHEREAS, the Department issued its Statement of Intent on May I, 2007, and published its Notice of Intent regarding the Amendment on May 2, 2007; and WHEREAS, as set forth in the Statement ofIntent, the Department contends that the Amendment is not "in compliance" for failure to protect certain natural resources; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes, DCA has initiated the above-styled formal administrative proceeding challenging the Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Florida Wildlife Federation and the Collier County Audubon Society were granted petitioners-in-intervention status on June 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, Buckley Enterprises, Hideout Golf Club, Ltd, and John L. Cowan and Jane Ann Cowan, Trustees were granted respondents-in-intervention status on July 24, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Local Government and the respondents-in-intervention dispute the allegations of the Statement ofIntent regarding the Amendment; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid the expense, delay, and uncertainty of lengthy litigation and to resolve this proceeding under the terms set forth herein, and agree it is in their respecti ve mutual best interests to do so; 2 of 12 --- "''''''''''''''-~-----' NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises hereinbelow set forth, and in consideration of the benefits to accrue to each of the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby represent and agree as follows: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Definitions. As used in this agreement, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: a, Act: The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, as codified in Part n, Chapter 163. Florida Statutes. b. Agreement: This stipulated settlement agreement.; c. Comprehensive Plan Amendment or Plan Amendment: Comprehensive plan amendment 07-IER adopted by the Local Government on January 25, 2007, as Ordinance No. 07-18, d. DOAH: The Florida Division of Administrative Hearings. e. In compliance or into compliance: The meaning set forth in Section 163.3184(1 )(b), Florida Statutes. f. Notice: The notice of intent issued by the Department to which was attached its statement of intent to find the plan amendment not in compliance. g. Petition: The petition for administrative hearing and relief filed by the Department in this case. h. Remedial Action: A remedial plan amendment, submission of support document or other action described in the statement of intent or this agreement as an action which must be completed to bring the plan amendment into compliance. I. Remedial Plan Amendment: An amendment to the plan or support document, the need for which is identified in this agreement, including its exhibits, and which the local government must adopt to complete all remedial actions. Remedial plan amendments adopted pursuant to this Agreement must, in the opinion of the Department, be consistent with 3 of 12 and substantially similar in concept and content to the ones identified in this Agreement or be otherwise acceptable to the Department. J. Statement ofIntent: The statement of intent to find the Plan Amendment not in compliance issued by the Department in this case. k. Support Document: The studies, inventory maps, surveys, data, inventories, listings or analyses used to develop and support the Plan Amendment or Remedial Plan Amendment. 2. Department Powers. The Department is the state land planning agency and has the power and duty to administer and enforce the Act and to determine whether the Plan Amendment is in compliance. 3. Negotiation of Agreement. The Department issued its Notice and Statement of Intent to find the Plan Amendment not in compliance, and filed the Petition in this case to that effect. Subsequent to the filing of the Petition the parties conferred and agreed to resolve the issues in the Petition, Notice and Statement ofIntent through this Agreement. It is the intent of this Agreement to resolve fully all issues between the parties in this proceeding. 4. Dismissal. If the Local Government completes the Remedial Actions required by this Agreement, the Department will issue a cumulative Notice of Intent addressing both the Remedial Plan Amendment and the initial Plan Amendment subject to these proceedings. The Department will file the cumulative Notice ofIntent with the DOAH. The Department will also file a request to relinquish jurisdiction to the Department for dismissal of this proceeding or for realignment of the parties, as appropriate under Section 163.31 84(16)(t), Florida Statutes. 5. Description of Provisions not in Compliance and Remedial Actions: Legal Effect of Agreement. Exhibit A to this Agreement is a copy of the Statement of Intent, which identifies the provisions not in compliance. Exhibit B contains Remedial Actions needed for compliance. Exhibits A and B are incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. T'l\is Agreement constitutes a stipulation that if the Remedial Actions are accomplished, the Plan Amendment will be in compliance. 40f 12 6 Remedial Actions to be Considered for Adootion. The Local Government agrees to consider for adoption by fonnal action of its governing body all Remedial Actions described in Exhibit B no later than the time period provided for in this Agreement. 7 AdoPtion or Approval of Remedial Plan Amendments. Within 60 days after execution of this Agreement by the parties, the Local Government shall consider for adoption all Remedial Actions or Plan Amendments and amendments to the Support Documents. This may be done at a single adoption hearing. Within 10 working days after adoption of the Remedial Plan Amendment, the Local Government shall transmit 3 copies of the amendment to the Department as provided in Rule 9J-II.0131(3), Florida Administrative Code. The Local Government also shall submit one copy to the regional planning agency and to any other unit of local or state government that has filed a written request with the governing body for a copy of the Remedial Plan Amendment and a copy to any party granted intervenor status in this proceeding. The Remedial Plan Amendment shall be transmitted to the Department along with a letter which describes the remedial action adopted for each part of the plan amended, including references to specific portions and pages. 8. Acknowledgment. All parties to this Agreement acknowledge that the "based upon" provisions in Section 163.3184(8), Florida Statutes, do not apply to the Remedial Plan Amendment. 9. Review of Remedial Plan Amendments and Notice of Intent. Within 30 days after receipt of the adopted Remedial Plan Amendments and Support Documents, the Department shall issue a Notice ofIntent pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, for the adopted amendments in accordance with this Agreement. a. In Compliance: If the adopted Remedial Actions satisfy this Agreement, the Department shall issue a cumulative Notice ofIntent addressing both the Plan Amendment and the Remedial Plan Amendment as being in compliance. The Department shall file this cumulative notice with DOAH and shall move to realign the parties or to have this proceeding dismissed, as may be appropriate. 5 of 12 b. Not in Comoliance: If the Remedial Actions do not satisfy this Agreement, the Department shall issue a Notice ofIntent to find the Plan Amendment not in compliance and shall forward the notice to DOAH for consolidation with the pending proceeding. 10. Effect of Amendment. Adoption of any Remedial Plan Amendment shall not be counted toward the frequency restrictions imposed upon plan amendments pursuant to Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes. II. Purpose of this Agreement: Not Establishing Precedent. The parties enter into this Agreement in a spirit of cooperation for the purpose of avoiding costly, lengthy and unnecessary litigation and in recognition of the desire for the speedy and reasonable resolution of disputes arising out of or related to the Plan Amendment. The acceptance of proposals for purposes ofthis Agreement is part of a negotiated agreement affecting many factual and legal issues and is not an endorsement of, and does not establish precedent for, the use of these proposals in any other circumstances or by any other local government. 12. Approval bv Governing Bodv. This Agreement has been approved by the Local Government's governing body at a public hearing advertised at least 10 days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the manner prescribed for advertisements in Section 163.3184(16)( c), Florida Statutes. This Agreement has been executed by the appropriate officer as provided in the Local Government's charter or other regulations. 13. Changes in Law. Nothing in this Agreement shall be constmed to relieve either party from adhering to the law, and in the event of a change in any statute or administrative regulation inconsistent with this agreement, the statute or regulation shall take precedence and shall be deemed incorporated in this Agreement by reference. 14. Other Persons Unaffected. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to affect the rights of any person not a party to this Agreement. This Agreement is not intended to benefit any third party. 6 of 12 "~'-""'"'~~'";--'._-- 15. Attorney Fees and Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs, including attorney fees, incurred in connection with the above-captioned case and this Agreement. 16. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution by the Department and the Local Government. 17. Filing and Continuance. This Agreement shall be filed with DOAH by the Department after execution by the parties. Upon the filing of this Agreement, the administrative proceeding in this matter shall be stayed by the Administrative Law Judge in accordance with Section 163.3184(16)(b), Florida Statutes. 18. Retention of Right to Final Hearing.. Both parties hereby retain the right to have a final hearing in this proceeding in the event of a breach of this Agreement, and nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of such right. Any party to this Agreement may move to have this matter set for hearing if it becomes apparent that any other party whose action is required by this Agreement is not proceeding in good faith to take that action. 19. Construction of Agreement. All parties to this Agreement are deemed to have participated in its drafting. In the event of any ambiguity in the terms of this Agreement, the parties agree that such ambiguity shall be construed without regard to which of the parties drafted the provision in question. 20. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties and no verbal or written assurance or promise is effective or binding unless included in this document. 21, Governmental Discretion Unaffected. This Agreement is not intended to bind the Local Government in the exercise of governmental discretion which is exercisable in accordance with law only upon the giving of appropriate public notice and required public hearings. 22. Multiole Originals. This Agreement may be executed in any number of originals, all of which evidence one agreement, and only one of which need be produced for any purpose, 23. Captions. The captions inserted in this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not be utilized to construe or interpret any provision of this Agreement. 7 of 12 In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their undersigned officials as duly authorized. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS By: ~ Q... L J J..-l J '"l"'... Charles Gauthier, AICP, Director Division of Community Planning IT eneral Counsel . d as to form and legality: ~ Date \D~\~/\D Date 80fl2 COLLIER COUNTY ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk '~":J) . './"", :/t ~"'..."..,..." ~"'."'....' '. ...... ~-. .'.-0( . '/' ,;, ,', " ',. , ,\Nt" '. '"'. i '~lt): 'Date/)..< ::1:,':.".. .. Approved as to form and legality: : ,\ ,n \ \_~) yjt-~-~-- '-'!--' 7 /~'"L______ . Steven T. Williams Assistant County Attorney I I . 11.;2.'1 i Ie' Date BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FRED W. COYLE, CHAI a, J 2.8 lip Date' . ~..~-, -''''''':'',:i1'iif~~;;3tf~'~~. .... . ~'~B'~i I HEREI3Y CE:rmFY THAT _II . ..... . iw. . "lOfrec:t ~D)I 0' . oecumenr on tHe III 90erd ..Inutes 8"dlttllOmS of ClJIIler 011 lilt .~~fSS ""' Ilano.~ .~clal ..., thII u cia, 01 N.~""'1 'Zo 10 GWlSNT. E. .....a8it' ,""., ........ ,.,' ,~,:...,~...,.. ,.~::.~.... - .' . ...J. .-'-,_. ........, - f.~.... ,.'.J' _,.. ... . .;,~",:,~~_~J~Y .",.,~....... .~, 9 of 12 FLORIDA WH.DLlFE FEDERATION By: 69(20 IZ-l>/ () l , Date COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY By: C;/JI!rO Date I I IO of 12 / Approved as to form and legality: c-- s./ O\t1 ax::> Thomas Reese, Esquire Date Cj h-3 /0 ~ao{.. Thomas Reese, Esquire Date j,t. 3 ! tf . - -....""""""'-.,,--..-.. BUCKLEY ENTERPRISES BY:~~ ;?~3o ,-/0 Date HIDEOUT GOLF CLUB, LTD By: ~\ -- ~ ~J\ \ I \ \ \ I \ \ 0 Date II of 12 Appruv..J as to form and legality: R~~n~e 1;;) II 110 Date Approved ,~s to form and legality: -(LG~~ Richard Y ovanovich, Esquire I Q "/1 '\) Date JOHN L. COW AN and JANE ANN COWAN, TRUSTEES Approved as to fonn and legality: By: --\\-L~.~ John L Cowan ~.~J1_{!co[).--=-r Michael A. Durant, Esquire / 6/, It 0 Date ' fO(-r),o Date 12 of 12 05/23/2007 12:00 8509222679 May 232007 11:53 DCA GENERAl COUNSEL PAGE 05112 EXHIBIT A STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS IN RE: COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSrvE PLAi."f AMENDMENT 07-1 ER Ai.\IENDlNG FUTURE LAND USE ~ocket No. 07-ER-NOI-1101-(A)_{N) ELEMENT MAP AND TEXT, THE CAPITAL L'vIPROVEMENTS ELEMENT. STATEMENT OF INTENT TO FIND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT$ NOT IN COMPLIANCE The Florida Department of Community Affairs (Departmenl), pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.012(6), Florida Administrative Code, hereby issues this Statement of Intent to find the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map series relating to Section 24 in North Belle Meade and the associated text amendments to the Future Land Use Element adopted by Ordinance Number 07-18, On JanullJy 25, 2007 not "in compliance", and also finds the Capital Improvements Element, adopted by Ordinance Number 07-07, on January 2S, 2007, not "In compliance" based upon the Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report issued by the Department on July 28,2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The Department finds that the Amendments are not "in compliance" as defined in Section] 63.3 I 84(1)(b), Florida Statutes, because they are not consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statl/les, the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187. Florida Statutes), and Rule 91-5, Florida Administrative Code. for the following reasons: 1. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163 FLORIDA STATUTES. AND RULE 9]-5. FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE A. INCONSISTENT PROVISION~ 05/23(2007 12:00 8509222579 May 23 2007 11:53 DCA GENERAL COUNSEL PAGE 06112 1. Ordinance No. 07-18: Future Land Use Element and MaD Series Amendment: The inconsistent provisions of the Fllture land Use Element and Map series pertain to changes to North Belle Meade Overlay as follows: Natural Resource Protection: The Future land Use ~!ap as it pertains to Section 24, and the text changes on page 45 of the strike Ihrough and underline version of the plan as it pertains to Section 24 are not in compliance because: 1. It is internally inconsistent with the provisions ofBl.d, on page 44 of the strikethrough and underlioe version, pertaining' to Red Cockaded W oodpe(kel$ (ReW) because the best available data indicate that Section 24 contains RCW habitat and therefore should be designated as Sending Lands consistent with the definition of Sending Lands in the County's comprehensive plan, According to the Comprehensive plan Sending lands "are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include signillcant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species". 2. The Future Land Use Map as il pertains 10 Ihe Section 24 is also inconsistent with Rule 9J-5.013(2)(b)4 which requires the County to conserve, appropriately use and prolect wildlife habitat. This is because the best available data indicate that RCW habItat is present on Section 24 and as such the property should be designated as Sending Lands. 3. Furthermore, these amendments are nol "in compliance" because they fail to respond appropriately to the best available data regarding environmental characteristics of Section 24. Rule 9J-5.005(2)(a) F,AC, requires the comprehensive plan, as well as plan amendments to be based upon relevant and appropriale data and analyses. 2 65/23(2667 12:66 8509222679 May 23 2007 11 :54 DCA GE/oERAl CCUNSEl PAGE 67/12 [Chapter 163.3 I 77(6)(a), (d), & (8)., Florida Statutes (F.S.); 91-5.005(2) and (5), 9J- 5.006(3)(b)4., (3)(c)\., & 6.; 91-S.013(2)(b)J.. & 4., & (2)(c)5:, 6., & 9.. Florida Administrative Code (F AC)). 2. Ordiunce #: 07-07: ClloltllllmofOVemenQ Element Chan2es: The inconsistent provisions of the Amendment under this subject beading are as follows: 1. The Schedule oCCapital rmprovements covers four years instead oftive years as required. This is inconsistent with tbe requirement thatloca! governments adopt and maintain as part of their comprehensive plm a Five- Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 2. The funding sources for the identified improvements are not stated per year of improvement. Instead, it is stated for all the projects listed on the schedule for each type of capital facility. For example, in the case of roads. revenues will come from gas tax, impact fees, bond, carry fonvatd, grmts, developer contribution (i.e., Ave Maria), general fund, and transfers. As a result, it is not possible to detennine iflhe proje<:t is funded by committed or planned sources in order to demonstrate the financial feasibility of the schedule. Slate law requires that projects be funded with committed sources of funds for years 1 through 3, and with committed and or planned sources in the 4'h md .s'h years. 3, The projected revenues for each of the identified sources are not provided; as a result, it is nol possible to demonstrate and determine the financial feasibility ofrhe schedule, i.e., to detcrmine that the County will indeed generale the funds from those sources to pay for the improvements, [Chapter 163.3164(32), 163.3177(2) & (3Xa), 16J.3177(6)(a). (c), (8), & (lO)(e), F.S., and 91-5.005(2)(a), (c), & (e), 9J.5.006(2)(a). 91-5,01 1 (I)(b). O)(!). (2)(b)1. & 2.. & (2)(c)L. and 9J-5.016(1), (2), (J)(b)l. 3, 4, 5. (3)(c)6. & 8. and (4), and 9J-5.0/9(4)(c)1., F.A.C] 3 05/23(2007 12:00 8509222679 May 23 2007 11 :54 DCA GENERAL CIJU.lSEL PAGE 08(12 B. Recommen'ded remedial actions: The above inconsistencies may be remedied by taking the following actions: I, Ordinance No. 07-18: Future Land Use Element and MaD Series Amendment: Re~'ise the North Belle Meade Future Land Use Overlay Map to change the land use designation for Section 24 from Neutral lands to Sending Lands in order to be consistent with the Sending Lands provisions oflhe Plan, as well as with amended Section oflhe plan pertaining to Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers (RCW). (page 44) of the l,'eVlsed Future Land Use Element (strikethrough and underline version). At the same time, the County should delete the additional requirements and limitations imposed on development in Section 24 (page 45) ofthe revised future Land Use Element (strikethrough and underline version) and treat the Section 24 Sending Land the same way as other Sending Lands in North Belle Meade. 2. Ordinance No, 07-07: CaDit.1 ImDrovements Element CbaDl!es: 1. Revise the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to cover five years as required. 2. Indicate the funding sources for each improvement included on the schedule for every year listed for that improvement. If the funds are coming from multiple sources, indicate the percentage of the funds for that project thai will come from each slat~ funding source. If a project is to be funded by State. CQunlY, or private contributions, the schedule should indicate that, and in addition show the percentage that will come fwm each contributor. For private contributions, the agreement between the county and the private contributor that guarantees the funds should be referenced in the schedule and included as an attachment. For the first three years the funds must come from committed 4 05/23/2007 12:00 8509222679 May 232007 11:54 DCA GENERAL COUNSEL PAGE 09(12 sources while for the remaining two years it could come from committed and or planned funding sources. You could use abbreviations to denote the funding SOUI'CCS and provide, as a footnote. the meaning of each abbre~'iation. 3. Provide data and analysis projecting the revenues and expenditures of the Counw for each of the sources that will be used to fund the capital improvements listed on the schedule and covering the duration of the schedule. The projections should include a briefhistoricaJ perspective of the County's ability to raise money from each source and based on that provide a projection of funds for the future. The analysis should show that there are sufficient funds, after the expenditures are removed, to pay for the capital improvements listed on the schedule. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. Inconsistent ul'Ovisions. The Amendment is inconsistent with the Slate Comprehensive Plan goals and policies set forth in Section 187.201, Flor/do Statlltes, including the following provisions: 1. Natural Systems and Recreation Lands Goal (9)(a), Policy(b)I., 3.,4., regarding the protection of wildlife and wildlife habitats, with respect to Ordinance No. 07-18; and Z, Land Use Goal (15)(a), Policy(b)2., regarding the development of a system ofincentives and disincentives which encourages a separation of urban and rural land uses while protecting, among other things, wildlife habitats. with respect to Ordinance No. 07-18; and 3. Public Facilities Goal (l7)(a), Policies (b)6, & 9, regarding the provision ofpublic facilities, witb respect to Ordinance No. 07-07. 8. Recommended remedial action. These inconsistencies may be remedied by revising the Amendment as described earlier in this statement of intent. 5 OS/23/2067 12:66 8509222679 May 232007 11:54 DCA GENERAL <nJNSEL PAGE 16/12 CONCLUSIONS 1. The Amendment is not consistent with the Stale Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Amendment is not consistent with Chapter 9]-5, Florida Admillis/rallve Code. 3. The Amendment is not consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. 4. The Amendment is not "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.31!l4(1)(b) Florida Sta/utes. 5. In order to bring the Comprehensive Plan amendment into compliance, the County may complete the recommended remedial actions described above or adopt other remedial actions that eliminate tbe inconsistencies. JJ- . Executed this.L day oEMay 2007, at Tallahusee, Florida. Yt (k h~c t2~.J Mike McDaniel, Chief. Comprehensive Plal11ling Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Ta!lahassee, Florida 32399-2100 6 EXHIBIT B FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS et al. v. COLLIER COUNTY et al. DOAH CASE NUMBER 07-2317GM DCA Docket Number 07-ER-NOI-llOl-(A)-(N) This proposal will settle the issues cited in the Department's Statement of Intent to find the Collier County Comprehensive Plan amendment adopted by Ordinance 07-18 Not in Compliance. The terms below apply to Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, located in the North Belle Meade Overlay of Collier County (Section 24). I. Sending Lands non-residential uses as they exist at the time of the adoption of this agreement, in Section II.B.I.C) of the Future Land Use Element of the comprehensive plan, are allowed. except as otherwise provided in this Agreement for certain properties. Some or all Neutral Lands non-residential uses are allowed on certain properties as provided for later in this Agreement. 2. Residential uses are allowed. The development density shall be one (I) residential dwelling unit per lot of record or legal non-conforming lot of record as it exists on the date of adoption of this Agreement if no clustering takes place. 3. For any clustered development, the maximum density shall be one (I) residential dwelling unit per five (5) acres, or 0.2 residential dwelling units per acre. The minimum gross acreage for clustering a single residential development shall be 64 acres. 4. For any clustered development, the lot size shall not exceed an average of one acre, exclusive of areas to be dedicated. conveyed or set aside for right-of-way purposes. Depending on the recommendations of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Habitat Management Plan required in paragraph 12 for clustered development, the lot size may be required to be less. 5. Interim, private water and sewer facilities shall be allowed to serve clustered developments until such time as County central water and sewer service becomes available. 6. For any clustered development, a minimum of eighty percent (80%) of the native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is consistert with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Policy 6.1.2e.-g., as it exists on the date of the adoption of this agreement. 7. F or any development that is not clustered, ninety percent (90%) of the slash pine trees shall be preserved, and a greater amount may be preserved at the discretion of the property owner, unless the RCW Habitat Management Plan recommends a lesser amount. 8. Any clustered residential development requires participation in a RCW Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in Paragraph 12 of this Agreement. Any non-residential development consistent with Neutral Lands non- residential uses, as authorized later in this Agreement for certain properties, requires participation in a RCW Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in Paragraph 12 of this Agreement. 9. Specific additional development standards and use limitations/allowances for the Hideout Parcels in Section 24: 2 a. Hideout will be authorized to cluster and construct 37 residential dwelling units on its parcels, in a single cluster, within the areas colored green on the attached map of Section 24. These dwelling unit figures are based upon total Hideout ownership in Section 24 (approximately 187 acres). b. Clustered residential development by Hideout shall take place only in the parcels colored green on the attached map, and shall be located in an area of the property determined by the RCW Habitat Management Plan to be most appropriate for development. For the location of the clustered development, the RCW Habitat Management Plan shall consider areas already developed and highly impacted, as well as areas contiguous to areas in the southeast part of Section 24 that are already developed and highly impacted. c. No development shall take place on the two Hideout parcels adjacent to the existing Hideout Golf Course (identified by striping pattern on the attached map of Section 24). d. All other cluster provisions and .requirements for Neutral Lands shall be applicable to the three green Hideout parcels (identified on the attached map of Section 24) set aside for development purposes. These cluster provisions and requirements are set out in the Rural Fringe Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted June 19,2002, by Ordinance number 2002-32, and incorporated into the comprehensive plan, and subsequently adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended, 3 e. The three Hideout parcels colored green (identified on the attached map of Section 24) are limited to residential uses and associated accessory uses, essential services, and parks, open space, and recreational uses, as well as necessary infrastructure to serve such development - all as provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands of the Future Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan, and as stated in paragraph 12.f.(4)(b) of this Agreement. f. For the three Hideout parcels colored green and the two striped Hideout parcels (as depicted on the attached map of Section 24), which total approximately 81 acres, the native vegetation requirement in accordance with paragraph 6. of this agreement shall be approximately 65 acres. g. Hideout's approximately 65 acres of native vegetation shall be conveyed to Conservation Collier, a Home Owners Association, or other like entity, for the purposes of conservation and preservation. The conveyance shall be in the form of a conservation easement (CE), or other instrument acceptable to the entity. (I) The entity in whose favor the CE is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the RCW Habitat Management Plan that will be developed for this area in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement as described below. (2) Such entity shall provide financial assurances to Collier County, in the fonn of a bond, letter of credit, or equivalent, of its ability to 4 implement and permanently maintain this RCW Habitat Management Plan. h. As set forth in paragraph 8., for any clustered residential development and for any non-residential development, Hideout will participate in the Habitat Management Plan and all other requirements of Paragraph 12 of this Agreement. I. For any future redevelopment of the seven Hideout parcels colored yellow (identified on the attached map of Section 24) to change the use from golf course, these parcels are allowed to develop with any of the non- residential uses provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands of the Future Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan, and are subject to all requirements and limitations of Neutral Lands. 10. Specific additional development standards and use limitations for the Cowan parcels in Section 24: a. In accordance with paragraph 2 of this Agreement, on Cowan's parcels totaling 97,7 acres, Cowan is entitled to develop one (I) residential dwelling unit on each of his six (6) lots of record as they exist on the date of adoption of this settlement agreement if no clustering takes place. b. For clustered development, in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Agreement, the maximum density shall be one (I) residential dwelling unit per five (5) acres, or 0.2 residential dwelling uni,ts per acre, not to exceed 19 residential dwelling units on the Cowan property. 5 c. If Cowan chooses clustered development, Cowan, 'or his assigns, will participate in an RCW Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in Paragraph 12 of this Agreement, and shall expend a sum of money to promptly implement the RCW Habitat Management Plan for Cowan's parcels totaling 97.7 acres. This initial amount ("Initial Management Amount") shall be no greater than $30,000.00. Once the RCW Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Cowan, or his assigns, agrees to fund the Initial Management Amount plus five percent (5%) per year, which shall accrue annually, as an inflation adjustment. d. Up to two (2) clustered developments shall be pennitted on Cowan's 97.7 acres. The c1uster(s) shall be located in an area(s) of the property detennined by the best available data, including the RCW Habitat Management Plan, to be most appropriate for development. e. Development within the Cowan southernmost approximately)6-acre parcel (Lot 35, Naples Farm Sites, Inc., identified on the attached map of Section 24, the "Lot 35 Parcel") next to the existing Hideout Golf Course (the seven parcels colored yellow on the attached map of Section 24) shall consist of road access and up to three clustered dwelling units. These dwelling units shall be part of the total number of clustered dwelling units assigned to the Cowan property. Accordingly, if three dwelling units are developed in the Lot 35 Parcel, then three dwelling units shall be subtracted from the total number of dwelling units, and Cowan may develop the remainder of units in a single cluster elsewhere on Section 24 6 Cowan property as set forth above. The lot sizes of the Lot 35 Parcel clustered dwelling units shall not exceed an average of one acre per lot, exclusive of areas to be dedicated, conveyed or set aside for right-of-way purposes. f. If clustering occurs. all other cluster provisions and requirements for Neutral Lands shall be applicable to the Cowan parcels set aside for development purposes. These cluster provisions and requirements are set out in the Rural Fringe Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted June 19,2002, by Ordinance number 2002-32, and incorporated into the comprehensive plan, and subsequently adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. g. The Cowan parcels are limited to residential uses and associated accessory uses, essential services, and parks, open space, and recreational uses, as well as necessary infrastructure to serve such development - all as provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands of the Future Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan, and as stated in paragraph l2.f.(4)(b) of this Agreement. h. Ifclustering occurs, Cowan's approximately 78 acres of native vegetation shall be conveyed or granted by a conservation easement (CE) or deed (as detennined by Cowan or his assignee) to Conservation Collier, a Home Owners Association, or other like entity, its successors and assigns, a non- exclusive easement. license, and privilege to enter upon, maintain, preserve and conserve such property and wildlife. 7 (1) The entity in whose favor the CE is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the RCW Habitat Management Plan that will be developed for this area referenced in paragraph IOc above and in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement as described below. (2) Such entity shall provide financial assurances to Collier County, in the form of a bond, letter of credit, or equivalent, of its ability to implement and permanently maintain this RCW Habitat Management Plan. t. As set forth in paragraph 8" for any clustered residential development and for non-residential development, Cowan will participate in the Habitat Management Plan and all other requirements of Paragraph 12 of this Agreement. II. Specific additional development standards and use allowances for the Buckley parcels in Section 24: a. In accordance with paragraph 2 of this Exhibit B, on Buckley's parcels totaling approximately 81 acres, Buckley is entitled to develop one (I) residential dwelling unit on each of his six (6) lots of record as they exist on the date of adoption of this settlement agreement if no clustering takes place. b. For clustered development, in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Exhibit B, the maximum density shall be one (I) residential dwelling unit per five 8 (5) acres, or 0.2 residential dwelling units per acre, not to exceed 16 residential dwelling units. c. If Buckley chooses to cluster development, Buckley will participate in an RCW Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in Paragraph 12 of this Agreement and agree to expend a sum of money to promptly implement the RCW Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adjustment. Once the RCW Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Buckley agrees to fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. d. Only one clustered development shall be allowed on Buckley's approximately 81 acres. and that cluster shall be located in an area of the property determined by the best available data, including the RCW Habitat Management Plan, to be most appropriate for development. For the location of the clustered development, the RCW Habitat Management Plan shall consider areas already developed and highly impacted, as well as areas contiguous to areas in the eastern portion of Section 24 that are already developed and highly impacted. e, If clustering occurs. all other cluster provisions and requirements for Neutral Lands shall be applicable to the Buckley parcels set aside for development purposes. These cluster criteria are set out in the Rural Fringe Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted June 19,2002, by Ordinance number 2002-32, and incorporated into the comprehensive 9 plan, and subsequently adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. f. If Buckley chooses to cluster residential development, the native vegetation requirement in accordance with paragraph 5. ofthis agreement is approximately 65 acres. g. If Buckley chooses to cluster residential development, approximately 65 acres of native vegetation shall be conveyed to Conservation Collier, a Home Owners Association, or other like entity, for the purposes of conservation and preservation. The conveyance shall be in the form of a conservation easement (CE), or other instrument acceptable to the entity. (I) The entity in whose favor the CE is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the RCW Habitat Management Plan that will be developed for this area in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement as described below. (2) Such entity shall provide financial assurances to Collier County, in the form of a bond, letter of credit, or equivalent, of its ability to implement and permanently maintain this RCW Habitat Management Plan. h. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph I l.a.-g. above, the Buckley parcels are not restricted to residential use, but rather are allowed to develop with any of the uses provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands of the Future Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan. 10 '_._''''"'''1'____''___'_'__ - i. The following conditions apply if Buckley chooses to develop any of the non-residential uses provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands of the Future Land Use Element: (I) Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Land uses, with the exception of facilities for the collection, transfer, processing and reduction of solid waste and the exception of earth mining, may be developed if Buckley participates in a RCW Habitat Management Plan and agrees to expend a sum of money to promptly implement the associated RCW Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adjustment. Once the RCW Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Buckley agrees to fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. (2) Non-residential Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Land uses shall be located in an area of the property detennined by the best available data, including the RCW Habitat Management Plan studies, to be most appropriate for non-residential development. (3) For Non-residential Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Land uses in Section 24, native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is consistent with the Habitat Management Plan and the County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Policy 6.1.2e,-g., as it exists on the date of the adoption of this agreement. 11 12. Safe Harbor Agreement a. Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) shall apply for and pursue a Safe Harbor Agreement with associated RCW Habitat Management Plan with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the approximately 81 acres (Cowan 97.7 acres and Buckley 81 acres) ofland they own in Section 24 that are described in paragraph 9.f. b. If approved, the RCW Habitat Management Plan will require such management techniques as the mechanical or manual thinning of trees and understory, and the removal of combustible materials to levels which would permit a "controlled bum" that would not destroy, but would maintain, the presence of a sufficient amount of slash pine trees for RCW foraging and cavity tree nests. c. Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) agrees to pay all legal and permitting fees related to their effort to obtain approval of the Safe Harbor Agreement. Additionally, if successful in obtaining a Safe Harbor Agreement, Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) agrees to expend a sum of money to promptly implement the associated RCW Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adjustment. Once the RCW Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan 12 ,.-~ -~~.......,..~..-"" or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) agrees to fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. d, The Safe Harbor Agreement and associated RCW Habitat Management Plan must provide that Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) can develop 37 residential dwelling units (Cowan 19 units and Buckley 16 units) in the areas colored green (Cowan blue, and Buckley uncolored) as set forth on the attached map. The RCW Habitat Management Plan must also delineate the maximum area that may be cleared, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan, within the green areas (Cowan blue, Buckley uncolored) set forth on the attached map. The Safe Harbor Agreement must allow 20% of Hideout's approximately 81 acres (approximately 16 acres) (Cowan 19.54 acres and Buckley approximately 16 acres) to be cleared when development occurs. e. The County, Department of Community Affairs (DCA), Florida Wildlife Federation (FWF), and Collier County Audubon Society (CCAS) acknowledge that once the RCW Habitat Management Plan is implemented, the County shall defer to the federal and state agencies as to protection of other state and federal listed species that may be present on the approximate 81 acres of land owned by Hideout (97.7 acres owned by Cowan and approximately 81 acres owned by Buckley) and described in paragraph 9,[ Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) agrees to comply with 13 all federal and state listed species criteria for development within the areas that will be allowed to be cleared pursuant to the Safe Harbor Agreement. f. The County, DCA, FWF, and CCAS agree to not comment to any of the state and federal permitting agencies during the permitting process for the Hideout (and for Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) parcels so long as the following takes place: (1) The projects are clustered; and (2) The Safe Harbor Agreement with associated RCW Habitat Management Plan is approved and being implemented; and (3) The referenced CE or fee simple title is granted to the appropriate entity for management of the RCW habitat; and (4) Permit applications are consistent with this Stipulated Settlement Agreement and all provisions of the Collier County comprehensive plan, except they are not subject to: (a) the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Objective 2.1 and subsequent policies; Goal 6 and subsequent objectives and policies, excluding policies 6, 1.2e.-g., 6.1.4, 6.1.5, and 6.1.7; and, Goal 7 and subsequent objectives and policies; and, (b) the Future Land Use Element, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, paragraph 2., t Clustering, subparagraph d), minimum project size; Paragraph 3. Allowable Uses, subparagraphs 3.a), d) through h),j) through 14 p), r) and s) [these excepted uses are prohibited]; paragraph 5. Density Blending [this provision is not available for these parcels]. g. The FWF and CCAS further agree to use their best efforts to persuade the National Wildlife Federation and Audubon Society of Florida to refrain from commenting to any state or federal permitting agencies during the permitting process for the Hideout developments (and Cowan or Buckley developments at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) so long as the following takes place: (I) See Subparagraphs 12.f. (I) through (4) immediately above. h. Should Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) be unable to secure an acceptable Safe Harbor Agreement with associated RCW Habitat Management Plan, or should the cost of implementing the RCW Habitat Management Plan exceed the sum of $30,000.00 plus the inflation factor set forth herein and no additional funding can be obtained, then Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) shall be deemed to have satisfied their Safe Harbor Agreement and associated RCW Management Plan obligations pursuant to this Agreement with the contribution of $30,000.00 toward management of the RCW habitat. In such an event, the remaining provisions and requirements relating to density. clustering, preservation and any other applicable development standards ofthis Stipulated 15 Settlement Agreement, and the Collier County GMP, except as excepted in paragraph 12.f.(4) of this Agreement, remain effective and applicable to the Hideout (and Cowan or Buckley at such time either Cowan or Buckley chooses to cluster residential density) parcels in Section 24. The Collier County Comprehensive Plan will be amended as necessary to recognize and implement this Stipulated Settlement Agreement. This amendment will be initiated by Collier County at Collier County's expense, except that public notice expenses will be paid on a proportionate share basis by CoIlier County and the intervener property owners entering into this agreement. 16 I n~~ II "L I I I I ~=_-1-_~: --~ II--Jl~" 32 33 " " " , i-'-- -'--1' I, 1- J I -- - -- ::1--~ ILJ~L-=~=-_---,,=------,m~_ L-=- ~__bJ I~i~~~- j- -~J T '-~----- - --------.------==.---==---=---~=-::-==...:-=~_=j-f-----1'B!L~\lQ/!J;--.l^-"-^_l!&'-'!!Li:!..aL\4l) "---=::"'-__~.:._,_ r-" I ' 1-- , - ,---J I-~l~ -r.i---I Lf-. f~i.j r-=+=..::-j 1~:rlJ__ Ii !~ 30 5 2 ~ NAPLES FARM SfTES, INC, SECTION 24, TOWNSIIIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST j . , --,'-------,,-- I j ! I I , ! , --,.,..! I L---" -~----, g < u , . > ~ < u , . , __,1.._____ ~ u , . ---1- ----1= I . j o g < u , . > ~ u ii ~ " < g . 12 " 11 11 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 21 21 ~,~ . , , , ~- " SERVICES DIVl~ION SCAIL - ,...:..+==1 ! ",------,,-- -..----,[ I'flEPAI1ED !lV: GI<;jCAD MAPPING SECTION COMMUNITY OE\il:LOPMENT AND ENVlRONM[NTAI IlAn:, 6/2010 FILE: NFS-244926.0WC L____________ _____________ :lOOn soon Agenda Item No, 8e December 14, 2010 Page 42 of 64 ORDINANCE NO, 10- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BY ADOPTING REMEDIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES, AND THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; AND BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on July 27, 2004, Collier County adopted an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for its Growth Management Plan (GMP) as required by Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2007, through the adoption of Ordinance No, 07-07, Collier County adopted the EAR-based amendments to its Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, on May 2,2007, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) issued its Notice and Statement of Intent to find certain portions of the County's EAR-based Amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Ordinance No, 07-07, "not in compliance" as defined by Section 163,3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS. Florida Wildlife Federation and Collier Audubon Society intervened in these proceedings as Petitioners-In-Intervention, and Buckley Enterprises, Hideout Golf Club, LTD, and John L. Cowan and Jane Ann Cowan, Trustees, intervened in the proceedings as Respondents-in-Intervention; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163,3184(16), Florida Statutl\!s, the DCA, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Petitioners-in-Intervention and Respondents-in- Intervention entered into a Compliance Agreement on September 28, 2010 to resolve issues raised in the proceedings; and WHEREAS, to implement the Compliance Agreement, remedial amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Future Land Use Map Series, and Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan have been prepared for consideration by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and did hold public hearings concerning the adoption of the Remedial Amendments to the Growth Management Plan on December 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional Information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these Remedial Amendments, including the following: the Agenda Item No, 8e December 14, 2010 Page 43 of 64 Collier County Executive Summary; and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the meeting of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on December 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that SECTION ONE ADOPTION OF REMEDIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES, AND CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the Remedial Amendments to the Future Land Use Element, Future Land Use Map Series, and Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, in accordance with Section 163,3184, Florida Statutes, The text and maps of the amendments are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION TWO SEVERABILITY, If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion, SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE, The effective date of these Remedial Amendments to the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES, AND CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT shall be the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163,3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier, No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on these amendments may be issued or commence before it has become effective, If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a Resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which Resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd, 3" Floor, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100, 2 Agenda Item No. 8e December 14, 2010 Page 44 of 64 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this 141h day of December, 2010. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Steve Williams, ",1;J " Assistant County Attorney ,I'. 3 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to BCC Agenda Item No. 8e December 14. 2010 12/14110 ~alitigof 64 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT B. North Belle Meade Overlay The North Belle Meade (NBM) Overlay is depicted on the FLUM. Uses shall be as provided for in Receiving, Neutral, NRPA and non-NRPA Sending Lands. except as provided herein for Neutral Lands in Section 24. Township 49 South, Range 26 East. and shown on the North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map. Development and preservation standards within this Overlay shall be as provided herein. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. IN GENERAL *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 5. NEUTRAL LANDS Within the NBM Overlay there are * 1.280 acres of land that are identified as Neutral Areas. The Neutral Areas consist of two ]/2 sections located at the northeast comer of this Overlay and Section 24 located in the northwest portion ofthis Overlay. The preservation standards for Neutral Lands shall be those contained in CCME Policy 6.1.2 for Neutral Lands. except as provided below for Section 24. The County has performed an RCW study for Section 24 and,--ifthe results of the study, in part, are the basis for the below Drovisions aDDlicable to Section 24. v,arnmt. tHe ]lIaR v,ili be ameRdea. 6. SECTION 24 NEUTRAL LANDS The following provisions aDPly only to all lands within Section 24, TownshiD 49 South. Range 26 East. within the North Belle Meade Overlay. shown on the North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map, and are pursuant to the Dartial stipulated settlement agreement between the Board of Count v Commissioners. Florida Department of Communi tv Affairs. Petitioners-in-Intervention and ResDondents-in-lntervention. aPDroved by the Board on September 28. 2010. a. All Properties ExceDt Those Specified Below in Paragraphs boo Coo doo e. and f. - Lots I. 2. 5-12. 20, 21, 36-40 and southerl v POliion of Lot 31. all whether a whole Lot or a Dortion thereof (uncolored and unlabelled. except for four Collier Countv Lots. on North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map) Words underlined are added; words strl:lch threl:::lgl=l are deleted. 1 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. 8e December 14. 2010 12114/10 ~~of 64 11 Allowable Uses: a) Agricultural uses consistent with ChaDter 823.14(6). Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm Act) b) Detached single-familv dwelling units at a maximum density of one dwelling unit Der 40 acres or one dwelling unit Der lot or Darcel ofless than 40 acres, which existed on or before June 22. 1999. For the DUfDose of this provision. a lot or Darcel which is deemed to have been in existence on or before June 22. 1999 is I) a lot or parcel which is Dart of a subdivision recorded in the Dublic records of Collier County. Florida; or 2) a lot or Dareel whieh has limited fixed boundaries. deseribed by metes and bounds or other sDecifie legal description. the descriDtion of which has been reeorded in the Dublic reeords of Collier County Florida on or before June 22.1999; or 3) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries. for which an agreement for deed was executed Drior to June 22. 1999. c) Habitat Dreservation and conservation uses. d) Passive Darks and other Dassive recreational uses. e) SDorting and Reereational camps. within whieh the lodging component shall not exceed I unit per 5 grOSS acres. f) Essential Serviees necessarv to serve Dermitted uses identified in Daragraph a.l) a) through e). such as the following: Drivate wells and septic tanks; utility lines, sewer lift stations. and water DUmDing stations; and. interim. Drivate water and sewer facilities until such time as County central water and sewer serviee becomes available. g) Essential Services necessarv to ensure Dublic safety. h) Oil and gas eXDloration. Where Dracticable. directional-drilling techniques and/or Dreviousl Y cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize impacts to native habitats. 2) Allowable Conditional Uses: a) The following uses are conditionally Dermitted subieet to approval through a publie hearing process: (I) Commercial uses accessorv to Dennitted uses a.1) a). c) and d). such as retail sales of produce aeeessorv to farming. or a restaurant accessorv to a Dark or preserve. so long as restrietions or limitations are imDosed to insure the eommercial use functions as an accessorv, subordinate use. (2) Oil and gas field develomnent and Droduction. Where Dracticable. direetional-drilling techniques and/or Dreviouslv cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized to minimize imDacts to native habitats. Words underlined are added; words str"c1, thro"gh are deleted. 2 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee A~enda Item No. se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~iiIi~gof 64 b) In addition to the criteria set forth in the Land Development Code. Conditional Uses shall be allowed subiect to the following additional criteria: ( 1 ) The aDDlicant shall submit a plan for development that demonstrates that wetlands, listed species and their habitat are adequately protected. This plan shall be pali of the required EIS as specified in Poliey 6.1.7 of the Conservation and Coastal Managcment Element. (2) Conditions may be imposed, as deemed appropriate. to limit the size. location, and access to the conditional use. 11 Native Vegetation and Preservation Requirements: Ninetv pereent (90%) of the slash pine trees shall be prescrved, and a greater amount may be Dreserved at the discretion of the propertv owner, unless a Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is prepared and it reeommends a lesser amount. Preservation rcquirements of Poliey 6.1.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element shall not applv. b. Hideout ProDefty - Lots 13 and 27 (Striped Pattern and Labeled "Hideout" on North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map) I) Allowable Uses: No development is allowed. e. Hideout Property" Lots 28-30. 31-34 and Northcrly Portion of Lot 30 Combined (Colored Yellow alld Labeled "Hideout" and "Yellow" on North Belle Meade Overlay Seetion 24 Map) I) Allowable Uses: a) Existing golf course development: OR. redevelop with any of the below uses b) through nl. subiect to the requirements and limitations of the RFMUD Neutral Lands designation: b) Agricultural uses: c) Dormitories. duplexes and other typcs of staff housing. as may be incidental to, and in sUPPoli of: conscrvation uses: d) Staff housing as mav be incidental to, and in support of, safety service facilities and essential services: e) SpOliing and Recreational camps. within which the lodging comDonent shall not exceed 1 unit per 5 gross acres: t) Essential services: g) Zoo. aquarium. botanical garden. or other similar uses: h) Public educational plants and ancillary plants: i) Facilities for the collection. transfer. proeessing and reduction of solid waste: j) Community facilities, such as places of worship. childeare facilities. cemeteries, social and traternal organizations: k) SDorts instructional schools and camps: Words underlined are added; words str"E1( tRrB"gA are deleted. 3 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No 8e December 14,2010 12/14110 ~alilJgof 64 1) Earth mining. oil extraction and related Drocessing; m) Parks. ODen space, and recreational uses; n) Private sehools. 2) Native Vegetation and Preservation Requirements: As Drovided for in Policy 6.1.2b. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. a minimum of 60% ofthe native vegetation Dresent. not to exceed 45% of the total site area. shan be preserved. d. Hideout ProDertv - Lots 22-24 Combined (Colored Green and Labeled "Hideout" and "Green" on North Bene Meade Overlay Section 24 MaD) I) Allowable Uses: a) Thirty-seven (37) clustered dwelling units. single family or multi-familv (fewer dwening units may be developed at diseretion of owner/developer); OR. b) One dwelling unit located on eaeh of the three lots ofrecord (total of three dwelling units); c) Essential services; d) Parks. open space. and recreational uses. 2) Clustering: a) Only one clustered develomnent is allowed. and a maximum ofthirtv-seven (37) dwelling units are allowed in that cluster. This dwelling unit figure is based UDon the total Hideout ownershiD in Section 24 of approximatelv 187 acres. b) The clustered develomnent may be comprised of single familv dwelling units. multi-fami1v dwelling units or a combination. c) The minimum gross acreage for clustering a single residential develoDment shan be sixty-four (64) acres. d) Lot size in clustered development shall not exceed an average of one acre. exclusive of areas to be dedicated. conveved or set aside for right-of-wav purposes. The lot size mav be required to be less. deDending UDon the recommendations of the Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan required in subparal..'faDh d.5) below. e) Anv clustered residential development requires participation in a Red- cockaded Woodpeeker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in sUbDaragraDh d.5) below. f) Clustered residential development shall be located in an area of the proDertv detennined by the Red-cockaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan to be most aDDroDriate for development. For the location of the clustered development, the Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan shall Words underlined are added: words str"ct\ thro"gh are deleted. 4 --,........"~,"_.~ Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 12/14110 ~ilIitlgof 64 eonsider areas alreadv developed and highly impaeted in Seetion 24. as well as areas contiguous to areas in the southeast Dart of Seetion 24 that are already develoDed and hjghlv impacted. g) All other cluster provisions and requirements for RFMUD Neutral Lands - set out in the Rural Fringe ComDrehensive Plan Amendments adoDled June 19. 2002, by Ordinance number 2002-32. and incomorated into the comprehensive plan. and subsequently adopted into the Collier Countv Land Develomnent Codc, Ordinance No. 04-41. as amended - shall be aDDlieable. except where in conflict with cluster Drovisions within this sUbDara~'TaDh 2). 3) Native Vegetation and Preservation Requirements: a) For clustered residential development. a minimum of eightv Dercent (80%) of the native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is eonsistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 6.1.2e.-g.. as that policy exists on SeDtember 28. 20 I O. However. this 80% shall be calculated based upon the acreage of these three lots combined with Lots 13 and 27 (aDProximately 81 acres total). yielding a required native vegetation Dreserve amount of approximatelv 65 acres. b) For clustered residential development. aPDroximately 65 aeres of native vegetation shall be eonveved to Conservation Collier, a Home Owners Association, or other like entity. fix the Dumoses of conservation and preservation. The conveyance shall be in the fonn of a eonservation easement. or other instrument aeceptable to the entity. (I) The entity in whose favor the conservation easement is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan that will be develoDed for this area in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement required in subparagraDh d.5) bclow. (2) Such entitv shall Drovide finaneial assurances to Collier County, in the fonn of a bond. letter of eredit. or equivalent. of its abilitv to implement and Dennanently maintain this Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan. c) For non-clustered residential devclopment. ninety Dercent (90%) of the slash pine trees shall be preserved. and a greater amount may be preserved at the discretion of the Dropeliv owner. unless a Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is prepared and it reeommends a lesser amount. d) For non-residential devel()])ment. ninety percent (90%) of the slash pine trees shall be preserved, and a greater amount may be preserved at the discretion of the Droperty owner. unless the Red-cockaded W oodDeeker Habitat Management Plan. required in subparagraph d.5) below. recommends a lesser amount. Words underlined are added; words <tmEl, tArsugA are deleted. 5 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. 8e December 14. 2010 12114/10 ~<OOgof 64 4) Non-residential Use Habitat Management Plan Requirement: For non-residential development, Hideout shall Dartieipate in a Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in subparagraDh d.5) below. and shall eXDend a sum ofmonev to DromDtly implement the associated Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30.000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adjustment. Once the Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented. Bueklev shall fullv fund the ongoing maintenance costs. 5) Safe Harbor Agreement: Clustered residential develomnent. and non-residential develomnent. is subject to the following requirements: a) Hideout shall aDDlv for and Dursue a Safe Harbor Agreement with assoeiated Red-cockaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the aPDroximatelv 81 acres of land they own in Section 24 that are described in subparagraDhs b. and d. above. b) If aDDroved, the Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan shall require such management techniques as the mechanical or manual thinning of trees and understorv. and the removal of combustible materials to levels which would pertnit a '"controlled burn" that would not destrov. but would maintain. the Dresence of a sufficient amount of slash pine trees for Red-cockaded Woodpecker foraging and cavity tree nests. c) Hideout shall Day all legal and pertnittinJ.( fees related to their effort to obtain aDProval of the Safe Harbor Agreement. Additionallv. if successful in obtaining a Safe Harbor Agreement. Hideout shall expend a sum ofmonev to DromDtlv imDlement the assoeiated Red-cockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30.000.00 plus five (5) Dercent Der vear as an inflation adjustment. Onee the Red-cockaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan is imDlemented. Hideout shall fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. d) The Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Red-coekaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan must Drovide that Hideout can develop 37 residential dwelling units in the areas colored green and labeled '"Hideout" as set forth on the North Belle Meade Overlav Section 24 MaD. The Red- eockaded Wood peeker Habitat Management Plan must also delineate the maximum area that mav be cleared. in accordance with the aDPlicable Drovisions ofthe Growth Management Plan, within the green areas labeled "Hideout" set forth on the North Belle Meade Overlav Section 24 Map. The Safe Harbor Agreement must allow 20% of Hideoufs aDProximatelv 81 acres (approximately 16 acres) to be cleared when development occurs. e) Once the Red-eockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented. the County shal J defer to the federal and state ageneies as to Words underlined are added; words str"ci( thro"gh are deleted. 6 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee A~enda Item No se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~aMgof 64 protection of other state and federal listed species that mav be Dresent on the aDDroximate 8] acres of land owned bv Hideout and eolored green and labeled "Hideout" and striped and labeled "Hideout" on the North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 MaD. Hideout shall comDlv with all federal and state listed species criteria for develo])1nent within the areas that will be allowed to be cleared pursuant to the Safe Harbor Agreement. f) The Countv shall not comment to any of the state and federal Dermitting agencies during thc pennitting process for the Hideout Darcels so long as the tollowing takes Dlace: ( I) Residential development is clustered as Drovided herein; and (2) The Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is approved and being imDlemented; and (3) The conservation easement or fee simDle title is granted to the aPDropriate cntitv for management of the Red-coekaded WoodDeeker habitat. as required in subparaJ.,'faph 3)b) above; and (4) Pennit aDPlieations are consistent with all provisions herein for Hideout nropertv and all other provisions ofthe Collier Countv comprehensive nlan. exceDt thev are not subject to: (a) The Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Objective 2.1 and subsequent policies; Goal 6 and subsequent obiectives and Dolicies, excluding (are subject to) Dolieies 6.1.2e.-g.. 6.1.4, 6.1.5. and 6.1.7; and, Goal 7 and subsequent obieetives and Dolicies; and (b) the Future Land Use Element. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Neutral Lands. paragraoh 2.. Clustering, SUbDaragraph d). minimum Droiect size; Paragraph 3. Allowable Uses, SUbDaragraDhs 3.a). d) through hl. il through oJ. r) and s) [these exeepted uses are prohibited]; Daragraph 5. Density Blending [this provision is not available for these narccls I. g) Should Hideout be unable to seeure an aceeDtable Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan. or should the cost of imDlementing the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan exceed thc sum of $30.000.00 plus the inflation factor set forth herein and no additional funding can be obtained. then Hideout shall be deemed to have satisficd their Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Red- cockaded Woodpecker Managemcnt Plan obligations set f()rth herein with the contribution of$30.000.00 toward management ofthe Red-cockaded Woodpecker habitat. In such an event. the remaining Drovisions and rcquirements relating to density. clustering. Dreservation and anv other aPDlicable development standards set forth herein and in the remainder of the Words underlined are added; words str"ch tI,rS"gR are deleted. 7 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~~f 64 Collier County GMP, exceDt as exceDted in subparagraph 5)t)(4) above. shall remain effective and aDPlieable to the Hideout Dareels in Section 24. e. Cowan ProDertv ~ Lots 14-16.25.26 and 35 Combined (Colored Blue and Labeled "Cowan" and "Blue" on North Belle Meade Overlav Section 24 MaD) 1) Allowable Uses: a) Nineteen (] 9) clustered dwelling units. single fami)v or multi-family (fewer dwelling units mav be develoDed at discretion of owner/developer); OR. b) One dwelling unit loeated on eaeh of the six lots of record (total of six dwelling units); e) Essential serviees: d) Parks. open SDace. and recreational uses. e) Aeeess road on Lot 35. 2) Clustering: a) UD to two clustered develoDments are allowed. and a maximum of nineteen (19) total dwelling units are allowed in cluster develo])lnent(s). This dwelling unit figure is based upon the total Cowan ownershiD in Section 24 of aDProximatelv 97.7 aeres. b) Lot 35 mav contain UP to. but no more than. three clustered dwelling units - in addition to road aeeess for all Cowan DroDerty development(s). A second residential cluster outside of Lot 35 mav contain the balance of the nineteen clustered dwelling units not built on lot 35. e) The clustered development mav be comprised of single familv dwelling units. multi-familv dwelling units or a combination. d) The minimum gross acreage for clustering a single residential develoDment shall bc sixty-fDur (64) acres. exceDt as Drovided in SUbDaragraph 2)b) above. e) Lot size in clustered develo])lnent shall not exceed an average of one acre. exclusive of areas to be dedicated. eonveyed or set aside for right-of-wav Durposes. The lot size may be required to be less. deDending UDon the recommendations of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan required in Daragraph e.5) below. f) Anv clustered residential development requires particlDation in a Red- eockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in Daragraph e.5) below. g) Clustered residential develo])lnent shall be located in an area(s) of the proDertv detennined by the Red-eockaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan to be most aDProDriate for develo])lnent. For the location of the clustered develoDment. the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan shall consider areas alreadv developed and highlv impacted in Section 24. as well Words underlined are added; words ,true" tArS"gR are deleted. 8 ~~-_. ---.....,.~~.~~...-.- Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Aqenda Item No. se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~aoogof 64 as areas contiguous to areas in the southeast part of Section 24 that are already develoDed and highly imDacted. h) All other cluster provisions and requirements for RFMUD Neutral Lands - set out in the Rural Fringe COll1Drehensive Plan Amendments adopted June 19, 2002. by Ordinance number 2002-32. and incofDorated into the comprehensive plan, and subsequentlv adoDted into the Collier Countv Land Devclopment Code. Ordinance No. 04-41. as amended - shall be aDDlicable, except where in conflict with cl uster Drovisions within this subDaragraph 2). i) For clustered residential development. Cowan. or his assigns. shall DartieiDate in a Red-coekaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in subparagraph e.5) below. and shall eXDend a sum of money to promDtly implement the Red-eoekaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan for Cowan's Darcels totaling 97.7 acres. This initial amount ("Initial Management AmounC) shall be no greater than $30,000.00. Once the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented. Cowan. or his assigns. shall fund the Initial Management Amount Dlus five pereent (5'10) per year, which shall aeCfUe annually. as an inflation adiustment. 3) Native Vcgetation and Preservation Requirements: a) For clustered residential development. a minimum of eighty pereent (80%) of the native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is eonsistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 6.l.2e.-g.. as that policy exists on Septembcr 28. 20 I O. This 80% shall be ealeulated based upon the total 01'97.7 acres. yielding a required native vegetation preserve amount of approximately 78 acres. b) For clustered residential develoDmcnt. approximatelv 78 acres of native vegetation shall be conveved or granted bv a conservation easement or deed (as determined by Cowan or his assignee) to Conservation Collier. a Home Owners Association, or other like entity. its suecessors,and assigns, a non- exclusive easement, license. and privilege to enter UDon. maintain. preserve and conserve such propertv and wildlife. (I) The entitv in whose favor the conservation easement is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the Red-coekaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan that will be devcloDed for this area in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement required in SUbDaragraph e.5) below. (2) Such entity shall Drovide financial assuranees to Collier Countv, in the fonn of a bond. letter of eredit. or equivalent. of its ability to implement and pennanently maintain this Red-coekaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan. Words underlined are added; words ,trucl< through are deleted. 9 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. 8e December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~<ffi4g0f 64 c) For non-clustered residential development. ninetv percent (90%) of the slash pine trees shall be preserved. and a greater amount may be Dreserved at the discretion of the DroDertv owner, unless a Red-eockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan is Drepared and it recommends a lesser amount. d) For non-residential develoDment, ninety percent (90%) of the slash Dine trees shall be Dreserved. and a greater amount may be Dreserved at the discretion of the propertv owner, unless the Red-coekaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan, required in SUbDaragraDh e.5) below. recommends a lesser amount. 4) Non-residential Use Habitat Management Plan Requirement: For non-residential develoDlnent. Cowan shall Dartieipate in a Red-eockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in subparagraph e.5) below. and shall eXDend a sum ofmonev to DromDtly implement the associated Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30.000.00 plus five (5) Dercent per year as an inflation adiustment. Once the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is imDlemented. Bucklev shall fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. 5) Safe Harbor Agreement: Clustered residential develoDlnent. and non-residential development. is subiect to the following requirements: a) Cowan shall aPDlv for and pursue a Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the aDProximatelv 97.7 acres ofland thev own in Section 24 that are deseribed in SUbDaragraDh e. b) If approved. the Red-coekaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan shall require such management teehniques as the mechanieal or manual thinning of trees and understorv. and the removal of eombustible materials to levels which would permit a "controlled burn" that would not destroy. but would maintain. the Dfesence of a suflicient amount of slash Dine trees for Red-cockaded Woodpeeker foraging and cavity tree nests. c) Cowan shall Day all legal and pennitting fees related to their effort to obtain aPDroval of the Safe Harbor Agreement. Additionallv. ifsueeessful in obtaining a Safe Harbor Agreement. Cowan shall expend a sum of monev to promDtlv imDlement the associated Red-cockaded WoodDeeker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30.000.00 Dlus five (5) Dercent Der vear as an inflation adiustment. Once the Red-eockaded WoodDecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented. Cowan shall fullv fund the ongoing maintenance costs. d) The Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Red-eoekaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan must Drovide that Cowan can develop 19 residential dwelling units in the areas colored blue and labeled "Cowan" as set forth on Words underlined are added; words str"cl< tArG"gA are deleted. 10 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee A~enda Item No 8e December 14. 20.10 12/14/10 ~<OOgof 64 the North Belle Meade Overlav Section 24 Map. The Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan must also delineate the maximum area that may be cleared. in aecordance with the aPDlieable provisions of the Growth Management Plan, within the blue areas labeled "Cowan" set forth on the NOlih Belle Meade Overlav Section 24 Map. The Safe Harbor Agreement must allow 20% ofCowan's aPDroximatelv 97.7 acres (aPDroximatelv 19.54 acres) to bc cleared when development oecurs. c) Once the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented, the County shall defer to the federal and state agencies as to Drotection of other state and federal listed species that may be present on the aPDroximate 97.7 acres of land owned by Cowan and eolored blue and labeled "Cowan" on the NOIih Belle Meade Overlay Seetion 24 MaD. Cowan shall eomply with all federal and state listed species eriteria for development within the areas that will be allowed to be cleared Dursuant to the Sate Harbor Agreement. 1) The County shall not comment to any of the state and federal Dermitting agencies during the permitting process lor the Cowan Darcels so long as the following takes Dlaee: ( 1) Residential development is clustered as provided herein: and (2) The Safe Harbor Af..'Teement with assoeiated Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is approved and being imDlemented: and (3) The eonservation easement or fee simDle title is granted to the appropriate entitv f'Jr management of the Red-cockaded W oodDecker habitat. as required in DaragraDh 3)11) above: and (4) Permit aDPlications arc consistent with all Drovisions herein for Hideout Dropel1y and all other provisions of the Collier Countv eomDrehensive plan. exeept they are not subjeet to: (a) The Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Obiective 2.1 and subsequent policies: Goal 6 and subsequent objectives and policies. excluding (are subiect to) policies 6.1.2e.-g.. 6.1.4. 6.1.5. and 6.1.7: and. Goal 7 and subsequent objectives and policies: and (b) the Future Land Use Element, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Neutral Lands. paragraph 2., Clustering. subparagraph d). minimum project size: Paragraph 3. Allowable Uses. sUbDaragraphs 3.a), d) through h), i) through p), r) and s) [these exeepted uses are prohibitedl: paragraph 5. Densitv Blending [this provision is not available for these parcels 1. g) Should Cowan be unable to secure an acceptable Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-coekaded Woodpeeker Habitat Management Plan. or should the cost of implementing the Red-eoekaded W oodDeeker Habitat Management Words underlined are added; words str"EI( tArS"gA are deleted. 11 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. 8e December 14,2010 12/14/10 ~<lii6gof 64 Plan exceed the sum of $30,000.00 plus the inflation factor set forth herein and no additional funding can be obtained, then Cowan shall be deemed to have satisfied their Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan obligations set forth herein with the contribution of$30,000.00 toward management of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker habitat. In such an event, the remaining provisions and requirements relating to density, clustering, preservation and any other applicable development standards set forth herein and in the remainder of the Collier County GMP, except as excepted in subparagraph 5)1)(4) above, shall remain effective and applicable to the Cowan parcels in Section 24. f Buckley Property - Lots 3, 4 and 17-19 Combined (Labeled "Buckley" on North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map) 1) Allowable Uses: a) Sixteen (16) clustered dwelling units, single family or multi-family (fewer dwelling units may be developed at discretion of owner/developer): OR, b) Agricultural uses; c) Donnitories, duplexes and other types of staff housing, as may be incidental to, and in support of, conservation uses; d) Group housing uses subiect to the following density/intensity limitations: Family Care Facilities: 1 unit per 5 acres; Group Care Facilities and other Care Housing Facilities: Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) not to exceed 0.45; e) Staff housing as may be incidental to, and in support of, safety service facilities and essential services; f) Fann labor housing limited to 10 acres in any single location: Single family/duplex/mobile home: 11 dwelling units per acre; Multifamily/donnitory: 22 dwelling units/beds per acre: g) Sporting and Recreational camps, within which the lodging component shall not exceed I unit per 5 gross acres; h) Essential services: i) Golf courses or driving ranges, subiect to the standards for these uses contained in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands designation; j) Zoo, aquarium, botanical garden, or other similar uses; k) Public educational plants and ancillary plants; I) Community facilities, such as places of worship, childcare facilities, cemeteries, social and fraternal organizations; m) Sports instructional schools and camps; n) Oil extraction and related processing; Words underlined are added; words 'tr"ok t~r8"g~ are deleted. 12 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Aqenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 12/14/10 ~<w~gof 64 0) Parks, open space, and recreational uses; p) Private schools. 2) Clustcling: a) Only one clustered development is allowed, and a maximum of sixteen (16) dwelling units are allowed in that cluster. This dwelling unit figure is based upon the total Buckley ownership in Section 24 of approximately 81 acres. b) The clustered development may be comprised of single family dwelling units, multi-family dwelling units or a combination. c) The minimum gross acreage for clustering a single residential development shall be sixty-four (64) acres. d) Lot sizc in clustered devclopment shall not exceed an average of one acre, exclusivc of areas to be dedicated, conveyed or set aside for right-of-way purposes. The lot sizc may be required to be less, depending upon the recommendations of the Red-cockadcd Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan required in subparagraph f6) bclow. e) Any clustered residential development requires participation in a Red- cockaded Woodpeckcr Habitat Management Plan and the requirements set forth in subparagraph f.6) below. f) Clustered residential development shall be located in an area of the property detennined by the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan to be most appropriate ft)r dcvelopment. For the location of the clustered development, the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan shall consider areas alrcady developed and highly impacted in Seetion 24, as well as areas contiguous to arcas in the southeast part of Section 24 that are already developed and highly impacted. g) All other cluster provisions and requirements for RFMUD Neutral Lands - set out in the Rural Fringe Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted June 19, 2002, by Ordinance number 2002-32, and incorporated into the comprehensive plan, and subsequently adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended - shall be applieablc, except where in conflict with cluster provisions within this subparagraph 2). h) For clustered residential development, Buckley shall participate in a Red- cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in subparagraph f.6) below, and shall expend a sum ofmonev to promptly implcment the Red-eockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan for Buckley's parcels totaling 81 acres. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five percent (5%) per year as an inflation adiustment. Once the Red- cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Buckley shall fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. Words underlined are added; words strblcl'l tArsblgh are deleted. 13 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to see Aqenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 12/14/10 ~<liii8gof 64 3) Native Vegetation and Preservation Requirements: a) For clustered residential development, a minimwn of eighty percent (80%) of the native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Policy 6.1.2e.-g" as that policy exists on September 28, 201 O. This 80% shall be calculated based upon the total of 81 acres, yielding a required native vegetation preserve amount of approximately 65 acres. b) For clustered residential development, approximately 65 acres of native vegetation shall be conveyed to Conservation Collier, a Home Owners Association, or other like entity, for the purposes of conservation and preservation. The conveyance shall be in the fonn of a conservation easement, or other instrument acceptable to the entity. (1) The entity in whose favor the conservation easement is granted shall be obligated to implement and maintain the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan that will be developed for this area in association with the Safe Harbor Agreement as required in subparagraph [,6) below. (2) Such entity shall provide financial assurances to Collier County, in the fonn of a bond, letter of credit, or equivalent, of its ability to implement and pennanently maintain this Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan. c) For non-clustered residential development, ninety percent (90%) ofthe slash pine trees shall be preserved, and a greater amount may be preserved at the discretion of the property owner, unless a Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is prepared and it recommends a lesser amount. d) For non-residential development, native vegetation shall be preserved in a manner which is consistent with the Habitat Management Plan required in subparagraph [,6) below and with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Policy 6.1.2e.-g" as that policy exists on September 28,2010. 4) Non-residential Use Location: Non-residential uses shall be located in an area of the property detennined by the best available data, including the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan, to be most appropriate for non-residential development. 5) Non-residential Use Habitat Management Plan Requirement: For non-residential development, Buckley shall partieipate in a Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan and the requirements outlined in subparagraph f.6) below, and shall expend a sum of money to promptly implement the associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adiustment. Once the Red-cockaded Words underlined are added; words ,tr"eh t~r8"g~ are deleted. 14 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 12/14/10 ~aiillgof 64 Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Buckley shall fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. 6) Safe Harbor Al..'l'eement: Clustered residential development, and non-residential development, is subiect to the following requirements: a) Buckley shall apply lor and pursue a Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Illr the approximately 81 acres of land they own in Section 24 that are described in subparagraph f above. b) If approved, the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan shall require such management techniques as the mechanical or manual thinning of trees and understory, and the removal of combustible materials to levels which would pcrmit a "controlled burn" that would not destroy, but would maintain, the presence of a suttlcient amount of slash pine trees lor Red-cockaded Woodpecker j()raging and cavity tree nests. c) Buckley shall pay all legal and pennitting fees related to their effort to obtain approval of the Safe Harbor Agreement. Additionally, if successful in obtaining a Safe Harbor Agreement, Buckley shall expend a sum of money to promptly implement the associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan. This amount shall be $30,000.00 plus five (5) percent per year as an inflation adiustment. Once the Red-cockaded Woodnecker Habitat Management Plan is implemented, Buckley shall fully fund the ongoing maintenance costs. d) Thc Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan must provide that Buckley can develop 16 residential dwelling units in the areas uncolored and labeled "Buckley" as set forth on the North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map. The Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan must also delineate the maximum area that may be cleared. in accordancc with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan, within the areas uncolored and labeled "Buckley" set forth on the NOlih Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map. The Safe Harbor Agreement must allow 20% of Buckley's approximatelv 81 acres (approximatel v 16 acres) to be cleared when development occurs. e) Once the Red-cockaded Woodpcckcr Habitat Management Plan is implemented, the County shall defer to the federal and state agencies as to protcction of othcr statc and federal listed species that may be present on the approximate 81 acres of land owned by Buckley and uncolored and labeled "Buckley" on the North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map. Buckley shall comply with all federal and state listed species criteria for development within the areas that will be allowed to be cleared pursuant to the Safe Harbor Agreement. Words underlined are added; words strldck thrOUGh are deleted. 15 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 12/14/10 ~<lOOgof 64 f) The County shall not comment to any of the state and federal permitting agencies during the pennitting process for the Buckley parcels so long as the following takes place: (I) Residential development is clustered as provided herein; and (2) The Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan is approved and being implemented; and (3) The conservation easement or fee simple title is granted to the appropriate entity for management of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker habitat, as required in subparagraph 3)b) above; and (4) Pennit applications are consistent with all provisions herein for Hideout property and all other provisions of the Collier County comprehensive plan, cxcept they are not subiect to: (a) The Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Obiective 2.1 and subsequent policies; Goal 6 and subsequent obiectives and policies, excluding (are subiect to) policies 6.1.2e.-g" 6.1.4, 6.1.5, and 6.1.7; and, Goal 7 and subsequent obiectives and policies; and (b) the Future Land Use Element, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Neutral Lands, paragraph 2" Clustering, subparagraph d), minimum project size; Paragraph 3. Allowable Uses, subparagraphs 3.a), d) through h), j) through p), r) and s) [these excepted uses are prohibited]; paragraph 5. Density Blending [this provision is not available for these parcel s 1. g) Should Buckley be unable to secure an acceptable Safe Harbor Agreement with associated Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan, or should the cost of implementing the Red-cockaded Woodpecker Habitat Management Plan exceed the sum of $30.000.00 plus the inflation factor set forth herein and no additional funding can be obtained, then Buckley shall be deemed to have satisfied their Safc Harbor Agreement and associated Red- cockaded Woodpccker Management Plan obligations set forth herein with the contribution of $30,000.00 toward managcment ofthe Red-cockaded Woodpecker habitat. In such an event, the remaining provisions and requiremcnts relating to density, clustcring, preservation and any other applicable development standards set forth herein and in the remainder of the Collier County GMP, except as excepted in subparagraph 6)f)(4) above, shall remain cffective and applicable to the Buckley parcels in Section 24. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Words underlined are added; words str"EI\ t~r8"g~ are deleted. 16 Future Land Use Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Aqenda Item No se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~<w~gof 64 Future Land Use Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Ccntcr Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11) Maps Collier County Wetlands Map Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Well fields and ASRs Map Future Land Use Map Rivers and Floodplains Future Land Use Map Estuarine Bays Future Land Use Map Soils Existing Commercial Mineral Extraction Sites Map Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopmcnt Overlay Map Stewardship Overlay Map Rural Lands Study Arca Natural Resource Indcx Maps North Belle Meade Overlay Map North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 MaD [no further changes] Words underlined are added; words st,"E1( t~re"gh are deleted. 17 eonservation and eoastal Management Element Remedial Amendment to Bee Agenda Item No. se December 14. 2010 12/14/10 ~$llgof 64 CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOAL 6: THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measurablc. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay PoUey 6,1.2: For the Coullty's Rural Frillge Mixed Use District, as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria: Preservation and Native Vegetation Retention Standards: *** **. *** .*. *** *** *** *** *** *.* ... .** *** b. Neutral Lands: A minimum of60% ofthc native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area shall be preserved, except as provided in the North Belle Meade Overlay in the Future Land Use Element that-; for Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, located in the NortH Belle Meade Overlay, a minimum of70~/" oftl1.e native vegetation present, Rot to e)[seed 70~~ of the total site afea, shall Be preserved' Words underlined are added; words ,tr"c1( t~r8"g~ are deleted. EXHIBIT 'A" Agenda Item No. se Deceml:~n~'*1 OO'iQJo~ Page 63 of 64 -, NORTH BELLE MEADE OVERLAY SECTION 24 MAP II I I, 1 I: " ,I ------, 'I; " 0 ~ 0 w 0 I: " 30 YELLOW " o o w o " YELLOW " I ~- --- \ '\I'LFS i' '\HM SITFS. INC' SECTION 2L TO\\NSlllt' .18 SCll'TII. IIANGE 26 EAST " o o w o " 29 1 I I -I I l' II II --=- ] I~ i- ~ j =I ~-) ---I -----1 _-':_j "20 ' . ,,~F-~ 1='1 =I II __I ,~-I!~I .,.~1, t:=-~,!, .~ ,'=1 ~~lll :~;[. _Ij:___ I _I'Ll --I 1-, ~-j'~~ Lj -=! I i ';; ~------ ------ - :i~l-: --~ L__~j ~Ilr~-I~~-)r~--f- I:~ ! '-i- 1_ i-. -- ... I I~~~I ~j I,~,-_T_' i I--~_ ", Fi=1 --~ ::;:~i > > I w w " " I < < u u 0 0 m m ro , --'- > ~ < u 0 m < " I > ~ 0 z z z w " " 8 Q ~ ~ I ~ < < w 0 u u 0 0 0 0 0 . " u u u m m " " " " 16 H " ", I , /O''''l'''''''_NT I Mioweo 8LUE 8LUE I IlLUE I --1---- > ~ < u o m " " o o W Q " z < . o u 25 " o o w o " 28 z < . o u /1 26 I i I ,,,,,::"",. . i _:W~-'~i 27 YELLOW YELLOW BLUE " o o w o " " o o w o " " o z o < w . o 0 " u 32 33 34 35 36 YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW BLUE nr:N l , '" it,,: ~E~I_:-,__A [<IN -'D\'!2 Agenda Item No. se December 14, 2010 Page 64 of 64 , 148 . Sunday, November 28, 2010 . Naples Dally News PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLICNOTICE NOTICE OF.PUBLlCHEARING AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given thet the Collier County Board of County Commisslonet'll will hold a pUblic hear- ing on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 in the Boerd of County Commissioners ehambers, Third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 E. Tamlami Trail, Naples. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The purpose of the hearing is to consIder a recommendation on adoption of an amendment to the Future . Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan. The Ordi- nance title is as follows: ' ORPiNANCE NO.1 0- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDlNANeE NO. 89-05. AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BY ADOPTING REMEDIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES. AND THE CONSERVAllON AND eOASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; AND BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVID- ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition CPR-201ll-4. Remedial Amendments to the Future Land Use Element Future Land Use Mac Series. and Conservation and Coastal Management Element, pursuant to the Compliance Agreement ap- proved by the Board of County Commissioners on September 28, 2010 pertaining to Section 24. Township 49 South, Range 26 East in the North Belle Meade Overlay. J~!~~'- --- I ~ J--"'- Colli... County Florida ~ .::c. ~ .-- c_ " ~ ____.to".,.. ~ .s.:;~ l ',~ '\ ..,,~ ,. c..-'.~-::: r-,-- =1 <j '-- .- ~.- .---. . . i\:------~'~- .....__...~- All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendment are available for inspection at the Land Development Sevices Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Any questions pertaining to these documents should be directed to the Land Development Services De- partment. Comprehensive Planning Section. (239-252-2387). Written comments filed with the Land Devel- . opment Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section prior to Tuesday, December 14, 2010, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of CoUl1ty Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing. he will need a record of that proceeding. and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ' . If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation In order to participate in this proc~ing. you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East. Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5358. (239) 252.8380, at least two days. prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA FRED W. COYLE. eHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK. eLERK By: . Is/Patricia Morgan Deputy elerk (SEAL) No 231188464 November 28 '"010 ii'!fJ IiJi/l -