Agenda 11/09/2010 Item #17C
. EXECVTJVE SUMMARY
. 'ill
. - ~ 'i,' t,,~,~ ~I~r
._l~ 850 NWN, LLC, CG :q, LLC &: CityGate Develo"lI."~~
. ",~,.. Fnth of Davidlo. ........ Ine., are requesting 8D ....~...
;'J.J~ f;Jev.p.e.t~)loi ~CIty Gate CODlDlerce, Park PUD... ..niI
'. ..' aa1ead OrdIaaDee, No. fII." to relDove Section VB, eIItIQe4;.....
, '.' .. '. . MaugemeDt PIau, to..-ognize that said M8DageJaeat. ....;.
,~"""to tile City Gate Habitat Conservatien Plan and tlMrCltt.:fIIte
,~~~;~~ The PUD, consisting of 287.:i: aens, is .....1::.~~ "
'. ,~..........,.(~. 951) and City Gate Boulevard NortII ia s.d-l"
:,'_:.... .i,~ CoDier County, Florida. (COMPANION TO; DQA_
,:':~ . .' "J:
i:~ .: , . ., ~,1l'
. "',"~~ ~.~, r:~~~~"~~~~':<
. '.F'l~t.t
, .J. ,~:. -.-~, .,(Ll':<j
.~.. .,;~:,;:i/;,....".
" -",.''': , I~' - '
. ,- - ,-.
":':/,,1';, ,... '" ,".
to _.~~"Boardof..County Co~~ (BCC) review"'. fi~.{
ftlCOm~ along v4......~nmi~ of the Collier County Plannmg
(CCPc) rea8nfing the ~!;,~ petitibD.h8nd ~der a decision regaidina,>~
~ petition; and.....Jile project. Ul.hannony with all the applicableCQdel
regulations in order to ~ 1fi8t.& community's interests are maintained. . ", '
- , ';,~!;' --
CONSmERATION~:
1)is 'PUD Ordinance proPosa.t,- ..remove the Red Cockaded Woodpecker ~. PI8D
~ PUD:' Otdibance ~ the requirements are refeftllDd in die
ofRegiou.lllmpact (DlU)',Development Order Amendment.,~y
. ~:: , .'
/1 ..
,irnfttlll"t fees.or to the issuance of building .ts to hel~.ti .'
..",' ,-',~.. prI .' pernn:l'
/e.m new development on public, faCilities. These impact fees are used to
""j'>,.'" . , "" '. . .,'
. in 1M Capital IInprovement Element of the Growth Management Plan. ..
':~ Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in 0l'dIlrr
,. .... ,i' 'of concurrency mAAAgemem, the developer of every loCal develQPJBeit
'6JDier County is required to pay a portion of the e.cd1mSlfed Tl1ID8pOrtation
. with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of theCqDter CoutV
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Othe(feles colleQted prior to issuance of a building .Pt'~ iDel"
building ~t review fees. FiDaIIy~:'~~.. revenue is generated by application ofqd
valorem tax rates, and that rev~' ~,~r teJated to the value of the improvemenia. PiiIIIliI
no1e that impact fees and taxes co~ ,wer, _ included in the criteria used by statI' aDd .,
~ . .ontoanalyze~"'. "
1 \:i:,^g-:,-~'i~iI' , . i
,~f~ I "'. :0,.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 2 of 158
. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
.
.
Comprehensive Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has found it consistent with the
applicable policies of the Future Land Use Element. A detailed analysis of the project's
consistency with the FLUE, and any other relevant GMP Elements is contained in the attached
Staff Report.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
This item was heard by the CCPC at the September 16, 2010 hearing, and by a vote of 8-0
recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a
recommendation of approval of this petition as submitted.
Because staff recommended approval, the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous, and
there were no letters of objection submitted, this petition can be placed on the Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is an amendment to the existing Citygate Commerce Center PUD (Ordinance No.88-93, as
amended) which proposes to delete Section VII regarding the Red Cockaded Woodpecker
(RCW) Management Plan. The RCW Plan will be contained solely in the DR! Resolution and
will continue to be legally enforceable. The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment
to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then
shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denial, that such denial
is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the
amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria.
Criteria for PUD Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract,
or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of
such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense?
Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the
County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Growth Management Plan.
PUDA-PL2010-845: CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER PUD
Revised 10/11/10
BCC Hearing Date 11/9/10
Page 2 of 4
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 3 of 158
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may .
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development?
6. Consider: The tImmg or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are
justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of
such regulations. ,,'-'
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future
land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern?
11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of
traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent
property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
.
PUDA-PL2010-845: CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER PUD
Revised 10/11/10
BCC Hearing Date 11/9/10
Page 3 of4
.
.
.
~':,.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 4 of 158
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance
with existing zoning? (a "core" question. . .)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration
which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the
availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service
adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defmed and implemented
through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as
amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the
Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,
safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the
County Attorney's Office. This Executive Summary has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and
is legally sufficient for Board action. (HF AC)
RECOMMENDA TION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for PUDA-
PL2010-845: City Gate Commerce Center PUD subject to the attached PUD Ordinance.
PREPARED BY:
Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Land Development Services
Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation
Attachments: I) Staff Report
2) Ordinance
3) Application
PUDA-PL2010-845: CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER PUD
Revised 10/11/10
BCC Hearing Date 11/9/10
Page 4 of 4
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 5 of 158
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
.
Item Number:
Item Summary:
17C
This item requires that all participants be swom in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members: PUDA-PL2010-845: 850 NWN, LLC, CG II, LLC & CityGate
Development LLC, represented by Josh Fruth of Davidson Engineering Inc., are requesting
an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the City Gate Commerce Park
PUD. This amendment seeks to amend Ordinance No, 88-93 to remove Section VII, entitled
Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan, to recognize that said Management Plan has
been revised to conform to the City Gate Habitat Conservation Plan and the City Gate
Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit. The PUD, consisting of 287 acres, is located at the
intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and City Gate Boulevard North in Section 35,
Township 49 East, Range 26 South, Collier County, Florida. (COMPANION TO DOA-
PL2010-843)
11/9120109:00:00 AM
Meeting Date:
Prepared By
Kay Deselem, AICP Planner, Principal Date
Community Development & Zoning & Land Development Review 10/11/20106:12:53 PM
Environmental Services
Approved By .
Judy Puig Operations Analyst Date
Community Development & Community Development & 10/12/20109:01 AM
Environmental Services Environmental Services
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP Administrator - Transportation Date
Transportation Division Transportation Administration 10/12/201010:40 AM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida Director - Transportation Planning Date
Transportation Division Transportation Planning 10/12/20105:13 PM
Approved By
Heidi F. Ashton Section Chief/Land Use-Transportation Date
County Attorney County Attorney 10/13/20109:11 AM
Approved By
Ray Bellows Manager - Planning Date
Community Development & Zoning & Land Development Review 10/14/201012:09 PM
Environmental Services
Approved By .
William D. Lorenz. Jr., P.E. Director - CDES Engineering Services Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 6 of 158
Engineering & Environmental Services
10/16/2010 9:49 AM
.
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Date
Office of Management & Budget
10/25/201012:09 PM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
10/28/201010:56 AM
Approved By
Therese Stanley
Office of Management &
Budget
Manager - Operations Support - Trans
Date
Office of Management & Budget
10/29/20102:40 PM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
County Managers Office
County Manager
Date
County Managers Office
11/2120102:22 PM
.
.
:.)Oa)
,-T""Lt)
~o..-
.N_
o .0
Zm,...
EQ;Q)
CD.c C)
-Em
-;;iCDQ.
'0>
cO
CDZ
;f
c cl~ a
c I
-- ~ I
~ DJ 111:1
I'-" I/!
- Z ~I ;1 ~ I
wQ ~I~
L- h
>--- t:~ \ - -p
rnO I
0 I
- ~~ l~ii I
~-
! / I
I -F
~ I
.. = I CU7~ /
;;;)
i i I
I I '-
J L~ ,.- ~ D
~ I--~
--- I
\ /
"-
- -- I ~
t--, I I -,- =
i \. '- l 1'/7/
,
'- 17/
IF I--- I
Ii! <l ;f I -
Ii
P >L \" ~ .,. ,~ M h~
l I ....-" ~ In_~ ~
I I ;- l -t-- ~1..:t:11
Ii] ~
....... / \J I J r-:-
T l_~) -...... "'"'" ~ ,;.;
.--0':-......... ~~
" l ,~ ig \ ~ U, \ ~' 1_ ~f, -..... "'""" ......""'-
\,~ ~ -I.
I ," ~ I ~ ~l[~ \:.6
~
~
5:
lDl!:!:
-I~
I
~
5.
00'l ~:
-I~
I
~
~
]Y.l5 01 ""' / ___
_ -C-
2
..
..
~
..
..,
~
~
CI
.. ~-
- I~
~
..
~
~
:;j
;;
~
~
~
c
~
..
N
I-Z
~Q
-,~
00
a:o
~ a......J
..
..,
~
~>:
~i
.- N
g -
~
5=
.., ~. ..
N I~ N
~
OI::lY^:nnoa 1:BrTlCX) ~96 ~-:)
I" ~ w
~ I-
::l <( .
I' Cl N
i
..
i
I~
0
~
co ~~~ ~
i ~ ~
~ -15~ Z ~
~ ..
~
c
aow""""" ~
J~
~:
i ::
~!
~S6 1::1 ~
l!l~ ~ I~
i!; ! ~~ ..~
~~ ~~o II
h ~r I!I n~
zil i
n ..
z~ ,
~
::l II! ~
o
~
II Q
....... 0
I~! ~
a..
<(
~
I>: Z
o
.-
<(
()
o
.....J
.
a..
<(
~
(!)
Z
Z
o
N
In
V
CD
0
;;
N
...J
a..
, .
<(
0
::>
a..
""
Z
0
l-
I-
W
a..
.
.
.
.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 8 of 158
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 88-93, THE CITY GATE
COMMERCE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY
DELETING SECTION VII CONTAINING THE RED
COCKADED WOODPECKER MANAGEMENT PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS~ on December 13~ 1988~ the Board of County Commissioners adopted (1)
Ordinance No. 88-93, the City Gate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development (the "PUD") and
(2) Development Order 88-02 (the "Development Order"), which approved a Development of
Regional Impact (DR!) known as Citygate Commerce Park Development Order; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an appeal by the Florida Department of Community Affairs
(DCA), a Settlement Agreement between Collier County and DCA resulted in Development Order 90-
4, Resolution No. 90-431 dated August 28, 1990 (1990 DOA), which amended Section One:
Conclusions of Law, Section 4, Vegetation and WildlifelWetlands, including paragraphs c and d
(which were entitled "Off-Site Mitigation" and "Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan",
respectively) of the Development Order; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of the 1990 DOA are the currently effective provisions relating to
Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management and mitigation; and
WHEREAS, 850 NWN~ LLC, a Florida limited liability company~ and CO II, LLC, a Florida
limited liability company~ (collectively "Petitioner") owns the PUD property east of the FPL Easement;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner, after formal consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife
Setvice (USFWS), developed the City Gate Habitat Conservation Plan (City Gate HCP), which
incorporates the latest Red-Cockaded Woodpecker ("RCW'') management methods; and
WHEREAS, the City Gate HCP was approved by the USFWS on March 30, 2009 and issued a
Federal Fish &Wtldlife Permit (City Gate Federal Permit) to the Petitioner on July l~ 2009; and
Underlined text is added; Struek through text is deleted.
Page 1 of5
City Gate PUDA-PL201O-845
Rev. 7/19/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 9 of 158
WHEREAS, the City Gate Federal Permit incorporates the most current RCW mitigation
strategies; and .
WHEREAS, the RCW Management Plan in the 1988 PUD varies from the RCW management
plan and mitigation strategies required by the City Gate HCP and City Gate Federal Permit; and
WHEREAS, Roger B. Rice, of Roger B. Rice, P.A., representing the Petitioner, petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend the PUD; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner, simultaneously with Petitioner's petition to amend the PUD in the
manner set forth herein, has petitioned to amend the 1990 DOA to conform the RCW Management
Plan and mitigation strategies of the Development Order to the RCW management and mitigation
requirem~tsof-the City Gate HCP and Federal Permit respectively; and
WHEREAS, upon the approval of Petition Number DOA.PL2010-843 and the adoption of a
resolution amending the 1990 DOA (the 2010 DOA), the operative RCW management and
mitigations requirements for the City Gate DRI/PUD will be the requirements of the 2010 OOA; and
WHEREAS, for clarity and administrative efficiency, both the COWlty and Petitioner agree
that: (I) the RCW management and mitigations requirements for the City Gate DRI/PUD will be the .
requirements of the City Gate HCP and Federal Permit respectively which shall be required by the
2010 DOA, and (2) that any actual or potential conflicts between the DR! and PUD with respect the
RCW management and mitigation should be eliminated by deleting all provisions regarding RCW
management and mitigation from the PUD, so that the requirements shall be only as set forth in the
2010 DOA; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the petition
on ,2010.
WHEREAS, the Petitioner and the Board of County Commissioners desire to amend the
PUD to conform to the City Gate HCP and the City Gate Federal Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Underlined text is added; Struek thrall~ text is deleted.
Page 2 of 5
.
City Gate PUDA-PL201O-845
Rev. 7/19/10
.
.
.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 10 of 158
SECTION ONE:
AMENDMENTS TO SECTION VII OF THE PUD DOCUMENT IN
ORDINANCE NO. 88-93, THE CITY GATE COMMERCE PARK
PUD.
Ordinance 88-93 is hereby amended as follows:
Section VII of the PUD document is hereby deleted in its entirety:
RED COCKJ..DED WOODPEC~R M:.A~NACEMENT PL.\N
The Red Cockaded Vlee~e6ker (RCW), Pieieaes Borealis, is a J3roteeted species of J3iBe ferest
dwelling wildlife. During planning of the Citygate project, several Reel Ceekaded
Waeapeeker nest trees '.vere ideBtified OR the site, and determiaation was made taat a Bamber
af Red Cookaded W ea~eekers utilize seme sf the nest trees anel forage on the "ine f(uested
pertiofls of the Citygate site, as well as on adjoining eff site pine forested laaels. .A.. Red
Cockaded Wees"eeker Managemeftt Plan was prepared, ineerporated in, and a",ue'.~ed as part of
the Develepment of RegieBal Impaet applieatieB. The elements of the plan have been
incorporated in tRe Citygate Master De.lelopment Plan aAG this PUD document. The eentral
feat1:H"e ef the Managemeftt Plan is an agreement to defer de',elopmeftt of a 72... acre area \....hieh
embraees tae Rest trees, a buffer Elf piae forest around the Rest trees, nnd a eeHieor of pine forest
whioh CORReets the Rest trees to eaeh other and to existiAg eff site pine forested lanas en v;hich
the Bires new forage, se loag as the birds cofttial::U~ their existing nestiag pattern. The 72+ aere
interim preserve area is indicated eft the Master Deyelopmeat Plaa, as are the Rest tree leeatiens
and 499 faet aiameter cireles are1:lnd each nest tree. After planning of the Citygate project was
initiated, a forest fire severely burned a large }:'lortiea of the Citygate site, iBekKting appr-eKimately
half efthe iflterim preserve area. Many ofilia pines in the burned area ha':e died, and the Fleriaa Ferest
Serviee aElyises 1:8at pine death '.vill eamim1e for several years. The loag term impaet af the farest fife Oft
1:ltili2miea af the area by Red Cee*aded Woodpeekel'S eaaoot be forecast with 000W'aey, but Bmma!
monitoring af the hif.l:k; will provide the aeeEled information.
The feYev.mg managementlmonitering aetivities are an integral part efthe Red Coekaded Vloeapee!Cef
ManagemeRt Plan ana of this PUD doeument:
1.
Prior to issuance of eORstmetion approval for the streets, drainage faei lities, 1:ltilities,
ete. iB a l"rejeet development/phase, a R~a Caek-adeEl Woodpecker survey 1:l1:ili2ing Bf)f)R>ved
methodology '.vill be eaaaooted to insure that the biras ha':e Bot established nest ea'.'ities in 1:8e
planRea ee85tn:letion area. The survey shall oeet::lf within 60 days of the start af
eeastrootion, and if it is aetermined that Red Cockaded W oodpeeker.Best sa'Aries have been
established in t::fte eo~tiea area, determination shaR he made by the agencies respoRSible
fer R-eel Coekaded W oodpeck.er ~ea la'.'Is as to the necessity of 1Bedi.fyiBg the Red
Ceekacled Woodpeclc<< ManagemeRt P-lar..
A.-m.1:I8I ~ Cee1aKied Woodpeeker surveys nt.ili?,jAg approved methodology will Be l:IIlEIertalcen
WitH five years after fmal Bwleout of the Citygate projeet, \vith r-es1:iks efthe annual swveys
to be fumtsI:ieel ta the Florida Game ana Fresh 'Water Fish Commission, the Seuth-\vest Flerida
2.
Underlined text is added; Struck through text is deleted.
Page 3 of5
City Gate PUDA-PL20 10-845
Rev. 7/19/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 11 of 158
3.
R-egionaJ. PlaeBiBg COl:lBeil, and Collier County 'Aithin 30 days of survey eompletiaa.
Metaleaea and other elL:atie '..egetatien \vitnm the Roo CeekaBecl V/oo$eeker preseFVe area HAd
eJse\vhefe aft the Citygate site ..\/ill be erilElieated, thus significantly enfiancmg the ctuality of
RCW fomge Sfea ea site.
~sive l:lfidergro\vth vAll Be oontrelleci by bumiag BBdlor BY \:I5e af mecliaaleal .plfteftt.
PiBe trees hll'liBg a DBH af 8 inches ar more, laeated outsiEle the RC\\' preserve but within
the r~ttirea yard BBd buffer areas iB the refBataaer oftke site, will Be eenservea te
provide additional RG\\' fElmge areas.
LaBds withHi the RCW preserve area may be 1:1tilized far lirnitee:t reefeational pmpases sooft 85
'.valJ.flvays, jogging trails, picRie faeilities, ete., 50 long as elisR1fbanee tEl Bative '/egetati8l1 is
minimal BRa tRe reereatioB8l activities aveiel the RCW Best trees.
Underge\:Hla utilities anfl surfaee dmmage swales may cross t:he RCW preserve area.
The pl'eserve area 'lIill be posteEl ':lith signs whish iBdieate that it is an RCW preserve Bftd
that c4ismrbance af the birds is prohibited aBa wHawful.
Pi'epesals to medify the Citygate Red Coe*adeEl VI oodflesker Management Plan may Be
submitted at BflY time. SHOO proposals shall be sup~ortea by a elilTElflt slHVey of on site Red
CeeltatW Woo~ nesting ana famging pattems, aOO sueh aaeitional information as is
required te evamate the proposed Management Plan ffiodifieation. The mtieaale for
8l:lt:kerizing 1attd5 to be remeved from the RC'AT ~reoorve area may include aaaBaenment aft:he
nest trees by the airds and/or a ehange in the charaeter of the pine rorest image area, Fesllitiag
in a less efthe habitat eharacteristies required by the RCW.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
.
Pro~osals to meaify tHe Management Plan shall be sebmitted to Collier Co\iBty as an
amendffieat te the Citygate PUD, ....~th eopies to the 80Hthwest Florida Regional PlaBBing .
CmmcH ma Florida Game and FresH. v,r ater Fish Commission. The Sauthwest Floricia
R-egieBal Pla.nnmg C01:lflcil and/or the Florida GefBe and fresa 'Water Fish Commission may
pmvide OOHlllieBts ami reoo~ons to Collier Ceunty regardiBg the propesed Management
PIeR medillcation.
The ~'Z0ning DiIeetor shall ~ a reeommendatiElB regarding the pre~esed
Managem.eat Plan modiHeation; an advertisea pHblic hearJlg shall be held BY the Board of
Ceunty CommissieBefS; and l:lpeB a fmding of sui1al3wt)' the Beare sf Caunty
Commissieflers may, by a majority vote, aHthorize the Feq\:lested Management PlaR
mociiBeat:ion.
"Ilie Flericia Game and Fresh 'Hater Fish ComHlission has feooFl1fl1ended te the Southwest
Florida Regioaal Planning CmHlcil that a regioaa:l plan be develElf3ea which ",rill resttk Hi the
poolic aeqWsition Elf geographically suitable vrildlifc habitat which is eemparable m amEll:lB.t
aad eharacter to wildlif-e habitat '",meh is lost to the process of urbanization ...fithin the
regiea. CemmissioB ".vildlife biologists have stated that apf3rmcimatdy 233 aeres aCthe 287
acre Citygate site have the eharaeteristics orRed Coekaded \lleeeJ3esker habitat The
CommissioJl'.vilaHfe biologists haye stated their eXJ3eetation that, upon aevelopment of1:8e
Citygate site eRd :rorroUfl<iing laRds, the eKiJting Red Cockaded WaeBpeek<<pef'ulati8l1 will
abaBdoa the area, in spite of the estaBlishment of the City gate Red Cael~eEl W oodfleeker
preserve area and associated R-ed Cookaded 'AT~er management oommitment:s. IR the e'/ent
Underlined text is added; Struel. tRr-ough text is deleted.
Page 4 of5
City Gate PUDA-PL2010-845
Rev. 7/19/10
.
.
.
.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 12 of 158
aregieaal vlildlife habitat a6€l1:Hsitiofl pIa is adopted, the purpose efwmeh is to mitigate
wildlife haBitat loss to lH"ban ee~:elepment in tke region, the Citygate project shall be subjeet
te such impaet fees or other i1'Hf3lemeatation meas~s as are lawfall)' eaaeted for the l31::H.'i'ese
of implemeat:ing the regioRal pIM.
SECTION TWO:
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of ,2010.
A TIEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Assistant County Attorney
(]o;,V \)
....\ Y / \
t'" ~\
)1('
CP\ lO-CPS.O 1 034\7
Underlined text is added; Strl:Jek throl:lgh text is deleted.
Page 5 of5
City Gate PUDA-PL201O-845
Rev. 7/19/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
AGENtj~dWi~g
Co1N:r County
- ~~ --
.
STAFF REPORT
FROM:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ZONING SERVICES-LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING & REGULA nON
TO:
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16,2010
SUBJECT:
PUDA-PL201O-845: CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER PUD (COMPANION TO
DOA-PL2010-843)
PROPERTY OWNER &APPLICANT/AGENTS:
Owner/Applicant
Agent:
850 N\\lN LLC~ CG IT, LLC &
City Gate Developmen~ LLC
159 Main Stree~ Suite 500
Akron, OH 44309
Josh Fruth, Project Manager
Da\oidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34105
.
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application
for a minor amendment to the City Gate Planned Unit Development (PUD) to amend Ordinance No.
88-93 to revise Section VIT, entitled Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan, to recognize that
said Management Plan has been updated to conform to the City Gate Habitat Conservation Plan and
the City Gate Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property, consisting of 287 :f: acres, is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR
951) and City Gate Boulevard North in Section 35, Township 49 Eas~ Range 26 South, Collier
County, Florida. (See illustration on the following page).
PURPOSElDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The subject property was originally rezoned from Agricultural (A) to PUD with the adoption of
Ordinance No. 88-93. That ordinance contained the requirements for a Red Cockaded Woodpecker
CRCW) Management Plan in Section Vll. In conjunction with the companion Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) amendment that amends that DR! DO to remove the
outdated language and replace it with language consistent with the newly adopted management plan.
.
PUDA-Pl201Q-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8f3O/10
Page 1 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
I: e140f158
c
~!pa
I I
I fl
r i:=' ~~I 1/ ,b, I
j, ill /
( 'l "1JiJ /
L/N/ i I
I I f-;l~'
J I~ {!
) ~~! L 11..'1 / I
( j ;- / i!
n,,; "-' ~ / \ Bj
If - \ It Ifl)c.ii;;m; , \
r: :" i-
i-I' -' I 1- \
-i Till I ~r= II
'" i 1/
J if "4J:E i;, I ~t, \
lJ)Y l - I !
.if i to. '-1
J 1 ~~..... .,
/ \J _ _;-: .~,
t*Y:l), GIMl.~ ~n:1O If
~~' fC~~I--'-"f. /'l~. 2~ :1,
~ 1 I' ~" -c. t'--.!
...
~
-T 'LIJ" ~ :"
!
j Z
.,-, w 0
~!<
00
o
...J
(m
:::: ..':
.
'"
<
'"
----
~
L------ --~i
* I ~ 1
_ _ I a: . ~
- - - ~ i I -c-TImT . ,
'" i -+' ::,1:'
i ',I I
+
"H ,,:)\ ~!; <I
!'f-- ..TTT i
jf--
",!< '
rP-1
a ~ ~ ~
' - -
, ;-
\1.1
-->
(_ ~ UTDJ
! /(:~t- - ,I w . " \
r .. '!"A l" \
~
TJ
.
~ 0 l': :1
'"
i! I ~ I
I
Sf ~! I
~~! I ~ ~! l!
I I I I ~,/
I
00'
i! w-I
:s 3!<i
c~ u::g,
~
::' :~ :; ~ lL..J
I
~ .
"
a ~
0:= N ~i
~ ~J Ii:
H
I!' a ~b
i
~TY'(JlJlfiII"'!"IXI ~~~_.~~-
]1 -
f-ts- ~
! i !~
,1 ~, t iii ~
ii g, .. , .... I ~ ;;
I- . l:l ~
Ii I i
~ ~ ~
1 1 u
. i
. ;;;11 i f
I - iei z !! "
~ i ,
0 i
~ ~
~OtlCN / ~
-
::
~
::!
~
a.
c:(
~
"
Z
-
Z
o
N
~I
01
01
Ni
Il
...Ji
0..:
<1
Oi
i5?!
.1
z
o
l-
I-
W
0..
a.
c:(
~
z
o
-
l-
e::(
U
o
...J
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 15 of 158
The revised mitigation and management strategies are reflected in the City Gate Habitat Conservation
Plan (HCP) and the City Gate Federal Fish & Wildlife Permit issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) in 2009. The PUD ordinance must be amended to reflect that same change, thus the .
petitioner seeks to remove Section vn of the POO such that the HCP and the Permit will be the
controlling documents for the project's RCW management plan. (See the staff report for Petition
DOA-PL2010-843 for additional information.)
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Golden Gate Canal, then Safe Harbor Subdivision and Golden Gate Estates subdivision, a
portion of Unit 28, with a zoning designation of Estates (E)
East: An undeveloped 300:l:-acre tract, with a zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A)
South: Developed industrial uses within the White Lake Industrial Park, with a zoning designation of
PUD
West: Collier Boulevard, then the undeveloped commercial tracts that are part of the Golden Gate
Commerce Park PUD and the Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce Center PUD
.
Aerial Photo (subject property depiction is approximate)
.
PUDA-Pl2010-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8130/10
Page 2 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9.2010
Page 16 of 158
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
. Future Land Use Element (FLUE):. The .su~ject PUD/D.Rl is I~ca~ed in th,e Urban Design~tion .an~ is
partially (mostly) within the Industnal DIstnct and partially wIthm the Urban CommercIal DIstnCt,
Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict (Activity Center #9, 1-75 & Collier Boulevard), as designated
on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The Urban Industrial District allows basic Industrial uses
(manufacturing, processing, assembly, storage and warehousing, wholesaling, distribution, etc.),
business parks, laboratories, and limited support commercial uses. The quadrant of Interchange
Activity Center #9 in which a portion of this project is located allows the full array of commercial
uses, residential uses, community facility uses, essential services, etc.
Interchange Activity Center #9 is subject to an Interchange Master Plan (IMP), which was adopted by
Resolution by the Board of County Commissioners, and to the implementing provisions adopted into
Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.02.23. Any new development or redevelopment must be
built in accordance Vvi.th the provisions of the IMP and this section of the LDC.
This PUDfDRI was approved in 1988, prior to adoption of the present Growth Management Plart.:,
However, the commercial and industrial uses and intensities approved in this project are consistent
with the FLUM designations in which it lies. This amendment proposes no change to the list of
approved uses or use intensity; the amount and configuration of open space will remain the same; and
the availability of improvements and facilities will not change if this amendment is approved.
Therefore, staff concludes that the proposed amendment to the City Gate PUDIDRl may be deemed
consistent with the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map.
ANAL YSIS:
. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC)
Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD
Findings"). and Subsection 10.03.05.1, Nature of Requirements oj Planning Commission Report
(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners (BCe), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the
rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under
the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following
analyses:
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed this petition and offers the
following comment:
Since RCW cavities were identified on the City Gate property over twenty years ago,
management tools and methods since that time (and those that were included in the original
RCW management plan) have been modified and changed. The latest listed species
mitigation strategies and management methods were required by the USFWS and were
required to be incorporated into the approved City Gate HCP. These changes are reflected
in their USFWS permit and as such need to be reflected in the DRII PUD.
.
PUDA-PL2010-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/30/10
Page 3 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 17 of 158
TranslJortation Review: It was determined prior to the Pre-application Meeting that the proposed
amendment would not have any transportation impacts; therefore, Transportation Department staff was
not involved in the review.
Zonin{! Review: Staff evaluated the amendment proposed in light of any changes to approved uses
and/or their intensities and/or densities; the development standards such as building heights, setbacks,
landscape buffers; building mass; building location and orientation; the amount and type of open space
and its location; and traffic generation/attraction of the proposed uses as part of the initial rezone and
previous amendment requests. The amendment does not seek to alter any development standards nor
increase the intensity of the project. No use changes are proposed that would affect traffic beyond
what has already been reviewed and approved. The petitioner only seeks to amend Section vn of
Ordinance Number 88-93 to delete references to the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan
because the information in the current PUD document is no longer correct and does not comport to the
HCP and the City Gate Federal Permit that has been approved for the project.
PUD Findin~s: LDC Subsection lO.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the
Planning Com~ission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the follo\-\oing
criteria"(LDC requirements are shO\vTI in italicized text and those are followed by staff's analysis
shown in bold text):
J. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and
other utilities.
.
The type and pattern of development have already been reviewed and found compliant with all
applicable LDC and GMP regulations. Furthermore, this project, as it develops, will be .
required to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other
utilities pursuant to Section 6.02.00 Adequate Public Facilities of the LDC.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate
to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas
andfacilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application provide satisfactory evidence of unified control.
Those portions of the existing ordinance not struck thru as part of this amendment and the
general LDC development regulations make appropriate provisions for the continuing operation
and maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives. and policies of
the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis GMP as it is applicable to
this amendment request. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be
found consistent with the overall GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
PUDA-PL2010-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16. 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/30/10
Page 4 of 10
.
"<-:t~'. ~'.'
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 18 pf 158
The proposed amendment is only to include a revised RCW Management Plan; therefore; the
appropriateness of the ~ within this project was reviewed in prior rezoning actions; no
. changes to the uses are proposed as part of this amendment. The landscaping and buffering
requirements were already reviewed and approved during the rezoning process as well. The
change proposed in this amendment request will not impact compatibility fmdings that have
already been made.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development
The amount of open space set aside for this approved PUD meets the minimum requirement of
the LDC. The proposed minor amendment will not change the amount of open space.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Since the project is currently being developed, the timing or sequence of development in light of
concurrency requirements does not appear to be a significant problem for this amendment. In
addition the project's development must be in compliance with applicable concurrency
management regulations when development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Please refer to PUD finding number 6 above.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public
. purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This criterion essentially requires an eyaluation of the extent to which deviations proposed for
this pun depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar
conventional zoning district. No deviations are being sought in conjunction with this
amendment therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
Rezone Findines: LDe Subsection 10.03.05.l states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the
report and recommendations of the planning commission to the Board of County
Commissioners.. . shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed
change in relation to the follo'Wing when applicable," (LDC requirements are shown in italicized text
and those are followed by staff s analysis sho'WTI in bold text):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the
Future Land U'\e Map and the elements of the Growth l\1anagement Plan.
As noted in the GMP Consistency portion of this report, the proposed development standards
revision would not affect the project's prior consistency finding. The project remains consistent
with the goals and objectives of the FLUE; therefore, staff recommends that this petition be
deemed consistent with the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern;
.
PUDA-PL2010-845. City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8130/1 0
Page 5 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 19 of 158
As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report, the
neighborhood's existing land use pattern is characterized by residentially zoned and used lands
in all directions and on all sides. No change in uses is proposed as part of this amendment.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;
The proposed PUD amendment would not create an isolated zoning district because no change is
proposed to the boundaries of the subject property of this already zoned PUD. Fun
consideration was given to this issue during the previous rezoning actions.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the
property proposed for change.
As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district
boundaries are logically drawn and as noted previously, no changes to zoning boundaries are
proposed as part of this amendment. The PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership
boundaries. The location map on page two of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the
outer boundary of the suhject par.cel.
5. 'fVhether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary.
The requested action is required because the petitioner must update the De\-'clopment of
Regional Impact (DRJ) Development Order (DO) regarding the listed species mitigation
strategies and management methods. The PUD document needs to match the DRI DO documents
and ,therefore, the PUD is being amended.
6. 'Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood;
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase trqfJic congestion or create types
of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because o/peak volumes or projected types
of vehicular trqffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise
affect public safety.
This PUD amendment does not increase the size or intensity of the currently approved PUD. In
addition, dcvelopment of the subject propert)' is consistent with provisions of the Transportation
Element of the GMP. Therefore, this project should not create types of traffic deemed
incompatible with surrounding land uses and it should not affect the public safety.
8. Whether the proposed change will create Q drainage problem;
Storm water management was addressed in the previous rezone process. The proposed
development should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically
addresses prerequisite development standards as part of the local development order process
that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Any proposed water
management and drainage system will need to be designed to prevent drainage problems on site
and be compatible with the adjacent water management systems. Additionally, the LDC and
GMP have regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new or on-going
developments.
PUDA-PL2010-845. City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16. 2010 ccpe
Rev: 8/30/10
Page 6 of 10
.
.
.
~,~.",,>~~ "~',;t~ 0,
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 20 of 158
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
The proposed amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas outside the PUD.
. Furthermore, the PUD document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure
light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further
demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further
ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas.
J O. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area;
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed minor amendment will not adversely affect property
values. However, this is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may be
internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors
including zoning; however zoning by itself mayor may not affect values, since value
determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed
in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments.
J J. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent
property in accordance with existing regulations;
Properties around the site where this amendment would be applicable are generally separated
by roadways or a canal. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the
LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process
and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in
deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed PUD
amendment should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
. J 2. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as
contrasting with the public welfare;
The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning
actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the
proposed amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the
FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with
plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing
zorung;
The subject property could be developed with the existing property development regulations;
however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in order to respond to the requirement to
update the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) regarding the listed
species mitigation strategies and management methods. The PUD document need to match the
DRI DO documents therefore the PUD is being amended.
LDC Section 2.03.06 sets forth the purpose and intent of Plan Unit Development Districts, and
staff believes the proposed amendment meets tbe intent of the PUD district and furtber, believes
the public interest will be maintained.
.
PUDA-PL201D-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/30/10
Page 7 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
. Page 21 of 158
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neIghborhood or the County;
The PUD document and the allowable development was found consistent with the GMP .
subdistrict requirements when the rezoning was originally approved; no changes are proposed
as part of this amendment that would jeopardize that finding. The GMP is a policy statement
which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable
throughout the urban-designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that tbe
development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that tbe project is not out of
scale with tbe needs of the community.
15. n71ether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
This criterion is not applicable to this amendment as the uses have already been approved and
no changes to those uses are proposed as part of this amendment. The petition was reviewed on
its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in
conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be
required to make the property usable for any of the range 0.( potential uses under the proposed zoning
classification.
This site has already been altered and partially developed in compliance with the applicable
LDC requirements, and further there is no "proposed zoning classification" as noted above. The
zoning to PUD was pre\'iously approved; only an amendment is being considered. Therefore,
this criterion is not applicable to this petition.
.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent
with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GrOlt'th Afanagement Plan and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding
Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and
objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by
count)' staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment
process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Sen-ice will be adversely
impacted.
18. Such other factors. standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem
important in the protection of the public health, safety, and we~rare.
To be determined by the BeC during its advertised public hearing.
Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is not seeking any deviations as part of this amendment to the
PUD.
.
PUDA-PL2010-845. City Gate Commerce Center PUD
September 16. 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/30/10
Page 8 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9. 2010
Page 22 of 158
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
. This petition did not trigger the need for a hearing before the EAC because no environmental issues are
being amended.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on July 13,2010 at 5:30 p.m. at the Fairfield
Inn, 3808 White Lake Boulevard. Approximately 10 persons other than County staff and the
petitioner's team attended the meeting. Mr. Rice explained the purpose of the NIM and provided an
overview of the proposed PUD amendment. Mr. Rice provided a brief synopsis of the project's
history, and had aerial photographs available for public viewing. The petitioner provided information
regarding on-going RCW activities for this project involving the Picayune Strand State Forest and
information about commitments fulfilled regarding traffic impacts.
Concerns were raised by several attendees regarding clearing that has taken place along or near the
project's north boundary, with Mr. Rice responding that the land within which the clearing was done
was within a canal easement. Mr. Rice stated that clearing was done by the South Florida Water
Management District or Collier County; the petitioner was not responsible for the clearing.
Attendees raised concerns about vehicle use of the canal easement, to which Mr. Rice responded that
as the petitioner for the PUD, he did not control the use of that easement, further suggesting that
persons with concerns should contact Collier County.
. Several other general questions about building placement and construction/buffering timing were
raised. Please refer to the Petitioner's written NIM synopsis that is included in the application
material.
COUNTY ATTOR~EY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PUDA-PL-201 0-845 revised on August
30, 2010.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CepC) forward Petition PUDA-PL-
2010-845 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval.
. PUDA-PL2010-845. City Gale Commerce Center PUD
September 16, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/30/10o
Page 9 of 10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 23 of 158
PREPARED BY:
~~pV
KA D ELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
?!;;'3!1O
DATE
.
REVIEWED BY:
~ r: ~Jj
RA YM D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
':7, . ...., -.. ( ()
.J . {-5' \w
DATE
ILLIAM D. L Z _, P.E., DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
6B -Iii' -2010
DATE
~B~
NI' ASALANGUID',' E~A.DMINISTRA TOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
o '6 .,1 ,-lc j 0
DATE
.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
~ "
MAR P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
q- 1&, 10
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the November 9, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
.
PUDA-PL2010-845, City Gate Commerce Center PUD
August 19, 2010 CCPC
Rev: 8/23/10
Page 10 of 10
.
.
-e
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 24 of 158
COlUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~.COUUERGO~NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
APPLlCA nON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
181 AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) D PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
D PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGATE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE:5n110
DUE: 617/10
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT{S) 850 NWN. LLC. CG II. LLC & CITYGATE DEVELOPMENT. UC
ADDRESS 159 MAIN STREET. SUITE 500 CITY AKRON STATE OHIO ZIP 44309
TELEPHONE # 330-998-0225 CEU # _ FAX # C2391 593-1309
E-MAIL ADDRESS:ROGERRICE@EARTHUNK.NET
NAME OF AGENT JOSH FRUTH. PROJECT MANAGER - DAVIDSON ENGINEERING. INC.
ADDRESS 3530 KRAFT ROAD. SUITE 301 CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34105
TELEPHONE # C2391 434-6060 EXT. 2969 CELL # _ FAX # (239) 434-6081
E-MAIL ADDRESS:JOSH@DAVIDSONENGINEERING.COM
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGL Y AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Revised Nov2009
~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 25 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLlIERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
, ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition.
Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County
Commissioner's website at hltD:llwww.collieraov.net/lndex.asDx?DClae=774
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: CITY GATE COMMERCE PARK MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS'
ASSOCIA nON
MAILING ADDRESS 9010 STRADA STELL COURT. SUITE 207 CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34109
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIAnON: _
MAILING ADDRESS _CITY _STATE_ZIP _
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOOATION: _
MAILlNGADDRESS _OTY _STATE_ZIP_
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOOATION: _
MAlUNGADDRESS _OTY _STATE_ZIP_
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILlNGADDRESS _CITY _STATE_ZIP _
Revised Nov2009
c.
c.
c.
, l"~~"',:
....".' .-. ','
~'_ 'f' . ~,", ~,'
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
QL1Ir County Page 26 of 158
aIIIIf!""" - _ -"--' .....
-. COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET (239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
I Disclosure of Inferest Inf,ormation I
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or ioinf tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address % of OwnershiD
..-
..
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
. Name and Address % of OwnershiD
see attached list
I
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address % of OwnershiD
--
Revised Nov2009
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 27 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE PRIVE
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.COLUERGOV.NET (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address % of Ownership
see attached list
...-.,
, '
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
Revised N0v2009
c.
c.
c.
.
.
-e
a&. County
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 28 of 158
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.COWERGOV.NET (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
g. Date subiect property acquired [gJ see attached list leased D Term of lease
yrs./mos.
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option: _
Date option terminates: . or
Anticipa~d closing date _
h. Should any changes' of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it
is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit
a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
PROPERTY LOCATION
Detailed lee-al descriotion of the orooertv covered bv the aoolication: (If space is inadequate, attach on
separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal
description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey
(completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-
application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning
the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Sedion/Township/Range 35/49/ ~
Lot: _ Block: _ Subdivision: City Gate Commerce Park Phases One. Two & Three
Plat Book 41 & 49 Page #: 6-7 & 97-100 Property I.D. #: see attached list
Metes & Bounds Description: See attached Leaal DescriDtion exhibit
Size of DroDertv: 2163' +/- ft. X 5182' +/- ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 12,509,996.40 Acres287.19+/- AC
Address/aenerallocation of subiect DrODertv: CR 951 and City Gate Blvd.
PUD District (lDC 2.03.06):
o Residential
[gJ Commercial
o Community Facilities
r8J Industrial
Revised Nov2009
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 29 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252~358
c.
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning land Use
N SF Residential Home
5 PUD White Lake Coroorate Park
E AG Vacant
Golden Gate Commerce Park & Collier
W PUD Blvd. Mixed Use Commerce Center
..
Does the owner of the subiect property own property contiguous to the subiect property? If so,
give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on
separate page).
Section/Township/Range _ / _ / -
Lot: _ Block: _ Subdivision: _
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Property 1.0. #: _
Metes & Bounds Description: _
(.
DN/A
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a rezone from the _ zoning district{s) to the _ zoning district{s).
Present Use of the Property: _
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property:_
Original PUD Name: _ Ordinance No.: _
c.
Revised Nov2009
.
.
.
eolre-r County
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 30 of 158
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COWERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
DN/A
EV ALUA TION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing the re%one request with specific reference to the criteria noted
below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Ruone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical
characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other
utilities.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
3.
Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management
plan. (This Is to include identifying what Sub-clistrict, policy or other provision allows the
requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-
district, policy or other provision.)
4. The intemal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restridions
on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations In the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Revised Nov2009
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 31 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COWERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
Deed Restridions: The County is legally precluded from enfordng deed restrictions, however, many
'communities hove adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civk or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requested In order to ascertain whether or not the request Is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use Detitions on the subied DroDerty: To your knowledge, has 0 public hearing been held
on this property within the lost year? [81 Yes 0 No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing? At the December 1. 2009 BCC meetina. Item 8 0 and E concern
aty Gate. The aaenda indicated the followina:
80. This Item has been continued'from the October 27.2009 and the November 10.2009 BCC meetina.
Recommendation to consider adoDtion of on ordinance establishing the Citv Gate Community DeveloDment
District (CDDl pursuant to Section 190.005. Florida Statutes. (This is 0 comDanion item to 10E.l
BE. This item continued from the November 10. 2009 BCC Meetina. This item reauires that 011 DartidDants
be sworn in and ex Darte disclosure be Drovided by Commission members. Recommendation to consider
adoDtion of on ordinance amendina the CitY Gate Commerce Park pLIo (Ordinance No. 88-93l to allow
streets to be public. (This is 0 companion to Item 10E.\
Note: Item 10 E was the Develocer Contribution Acreement.
OfficiallnterDretations or Zonina Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been on offidal
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? 0 Yes t8I No
If so, please provide copies.
Revised Nov2009
c.
c.
c.
.
.
-e
"::;:-<-',.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 32 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COWERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 ,
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been
made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be
considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or
ceases 10 sUDDlynecessaryinformation to continue processinaor otherwise actively Dursuethe
rezonina for a Deriod of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further
processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An
application deemed "closed"may be re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of
all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project
will be subject to the then current tode. (toc Sedion 10.03.05.Q.)
Revised Nov2009
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 33 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
c.
ISTATEMENT OF UTILITY PRO, VISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
riA
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) _
ADDRESS _ CITY _ STATE _ ZIP _
TELEPHONE # _ CELL # _ FAX # _
E-MAIL ADDRESS: _
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): _
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Sedion/Township/Range _I _I _
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
c.
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Property I.D. #: _
Metes & Bounds Description: _
J TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
(Check applicable system):
COUNTY UnLITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UnUTY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UnUTY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME_
c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPD capacity) _
d. SEPTIC SYSTEM
o
o
o
o
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM .
c. FRANCHISED UTIUTY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME_
d. PRIV ATE SYSTEM (WEll)
o
o
o
o
c.
Revised Nov2009
.
.
-e
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 34 of 158
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COWERGOV.NET
TOTAL'POPuLITION TO BE SE,RVED:
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
PEAltAND)~VERAG_ DAiLVDeMANDS;
..", '.' ... __ ........~ ....' _"...". ", ." . '... .-...~ _ .. . ... .-. I.,. ...
A. WATER-PEAK _ AVERAGE DAILY _
B. SEWER-PEAK _ AVERAGE DAILY _
IF PROPOSING TO BE ~ONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED _
", _." _.\ -- ..--,._.....'...- ..,._",.._.,..." ..... ,",_.' u'_
NA~~TJVE.;"$T.A~E.IfF~ Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
c.()~Li~~:~QijNrYuf~~ttY ,15~D.i~Atl()~ .S:i'At~MENt~ If the project is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage
collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities
in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement
shall also Include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and
connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building
permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to
dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER: PROVIDERS: Unless waived or
otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
Revised Nov2009
eo1R'e-r Coullty
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 35 of 158
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLUERGOV.NET '
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
ce
IN/A COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
The undersigned do hereby swear or affinn that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property
commonly known as City Gate Commerce Park Phases One, Two & Three
CR 951 and Citv Gate Blvd. - Naples. FL 34116
(Street address and City, State and Zip Code)
and legally descnbed in ExhIbit A attached hereto.
The property descnbed herein is the subject of an application for City Gate Commerce Park Phase One, Two & Three
planned unit development (M PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Roger Rice, legal representative thereof, as the legal
representatives of the property and as suph, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in
the course of seekiiig the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and
au1horization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning
approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property
until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project:
I. The property wm be developed and used in confonnity with the approved master plan including all conditions
placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit
development rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and
stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in
part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or
safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development
Code.
4. All tenus and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incOIporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within
the planned unit development must be consistent with those tenus and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the tenns,
safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel
compliance. The County will not issue pennits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit
development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance
with all tenus, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development
ce
Owner
Owner
Printed Name
Printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Sworn to (or affinned) and subscribed before me this
day of
.200_by
who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
ce
Notary Public
Revised Nov2009
'.
~B1' County
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 36 of 158
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COWERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
PUD AMENDMENT (PUOA) - PUD REZONE (PUDZ) . PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKUST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLlCAnON PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW
W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NondNCOMPLETE SUMBlTTALS WILL NOt BE ACCEPTED.
.
REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT
, '" , COPIES REQUIRED REQUIREC
' ,
'. "..'-.~.I~fQlij~~W''''~..~i~.~"...'v.,.~~~h;o'''='i~lf,.~'..'''''...''';ln'';-;",-
1~.stABD . .... ._ .'.. _..... ~'=r.~~~1f,.~"" ~~.?1.~~}t~:s~r!iS~!~~~~~~";&~~~~~~~_~
1 Additional set If located In the Bavshore/Gatewav Triangle Redevelopment Area)
Copies of detailed description of why amendment Is necessary '16Ju [XJ
Completed Application with rlSt of Permitted Uses; Development Standards Table; list of ~M [8l 0
proposed deviations from the LDC (if any); list of Developer Commitments and
Statement of CornDRance narraflve (download GDDlication from web for current form)
Pre-aDPRcation meetina notes 161M [XJ rl
PUD Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 Y2" x 11" CODY 24 181
Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 Y2" x 11" CODY 24 5<
Oriainal PUO doc/ord and Master Plan 24" x 36" - ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD r61M 8
Revised PUD aDPllcatlOl) wf1h chances crossed thru & underlined ff) 1M X
Revised PUD aDDrK:ation w/amended Title Doge wlord #'s, LDC 10.02.13.A.2 24 X
Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the laIM 8 0
aDDlicatfon material; please DO NOT Include It in the PUD documents)
~.__~.~~~~~~f].~~>~gf~~~~~-~;~~~~:J~~i~~~{~l;i~:~':'~~~~lfi.~~~'~~?{f~~~ih:~)~}~;~~~/~.~;:J:I:~;t:
Deeds/Legars & Survey (if boundary of original PUO is amended) 3 Igj 0
Ust Identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 t8I 0
Owner/Affidavit signed & notarized 2 r8I 0
Covenant of Unified Control 2 0 t8I
Completed Addressing checklist 13J~ t8I D
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital/electronic copy of EIS or exemption 0 ~
iustlflcation 4
Historical Surveyor waiver request 4 0 ~
Utility Provisions Statement w/sketches 4 0 [81
Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 0 181
Survey, signed & sealed 4 0 [8J
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) with applicable fees. For TIS guidelines & procedures 7 0 [8l
refer to httn:/lwww.coIlierl!'ov.netlIndex.a!mx?naae=566
Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1 "=400' 5 181 0
Bectronlc copy of all documents In Word format and plans (CORom or Diskette) 2 [8l 0
Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verifkation IN/A - See cover letter IT -S 0
If located In RFMU CRural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivin<;l land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacovera, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690.3500 for Information regarding
"Wildfire MItigation & Prevention Plan", lDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(b)i.c.
-e ,~J1,\Y\L~
.S/Ll! 10
Revised Nov2009
9[~n!
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
. Page 37 of 158
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
c.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET
AFFIDA vir
Well, JoseDh R. Weber being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am/are the owners of
the property descnbed herein ~nd which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that an
the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information.
all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this
application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well understand that
the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the
content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public
hearings will not be advertised until this-application is deemed complete, and all required
information has been submitted.
As property owner Well further authorize Davidson Enaineerina. Inc. to act as our/my
representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
Citygate Development, LLC. a Florida limited
liability company
~~W/b
By: Joseph R. Weber, its Vice President
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
c.
The foregoing
G IV/I
produced
instrument was acknowledged before me this Mil day of
, 2010. by Joseph R. Weber, who is p-ersonallv known to me or has
as identification.
..."..."",
~.+':'\\\AL ~''+.
i'." ...,.\'
! ~ . -. 1" \ An.. PeI8rsu
~ : -. f" ~ ResideatSlIIIIIIlitCuutr
~ * * i Notary PlIb11c, StatlOt.
\" Q l MyCommissioa &pires: 081t?,.3/)t'p/
~~~ o~,f 'I' " '"r
~'I";~.2~t'~
I
( nature of Notary Public - State of Ohio-
Anne. 13. ~I--e/sen
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public) "
State of Ohio
County of Summit
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGATE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, lWO AND THREE
DATE: 5/7/10
DUE: 6nt10
c.
cJL County
~~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 38 of 158
.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
AFFIDAVIT
Well, JoseDh R., Weber being first duly sworn, d~pose and say that well am/are the owners of
,the propertY described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all
the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information,
alt sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this
application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well understand that
the information requested ontryis application must be ,complete and accurate and'fhat the
content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public
hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required
information has been submitted.
As property owner Well further authorize Davidson Enaineerina. Inc. to act as our/my
representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
.
850 NWN, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company
CG U, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company
y: Joseph R. Weber, its Vice President
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
/?~
By: Joseph R. Weber, its Vice President
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregOing
Uf>0
instrument was acknowledged before me this ;2.9 tf day of
, 2010, by Joseph R. Weber, who is personally known to me or has
as identification.
produced
State of Ohio
County of Summit
t{,
ignature of Notary Public - State of Ohio
11M VI.o ,- 7),. .J... d _ _
Fn:III:D&vidson ~inll
239 494 S084
0411212010 18:61
Agenda Item No. 17C
.. P. ""er 9, 2010
Page 39 r 158
C(If I ~ COUIITY GOVERNJISIT
NUlS"_ DIPAJt1'IENT
-.ftI'IIl _aMl.rmt'
sdQ'. .
. .~
.- ,-
. ,
... NOR'IH HORESHOE DRIVE
tfAPI,.I!I. PIJ)RIDA 341M
(2I8J ZIN40e FAX (2SI) 28N7J4
c.
-... .'-' '. .'. .-'~.... " -.' ,';-- .-.. "'ii .' ~- ,', ..
, ... ......' .... ' . ,'..... . . ..
PIIIIIIJ COf..- 'w .. faIIowiI'G end f8K tI:t thiIt AddMIIIn8 Da,-t..leI'4 III ~ Of IUIImlt In pnon to the
~ 0..-..- at .. abcrva IIddrear.. fRrm muaf be IdcIn8d ~ AddrBMIqg DAt'llftft.W ~ 111 ~
_,1&1 ~ - -......... pi - ....1... far.Dmf aL.-
Hat II ... WIt .. tD fMIff proJBct. Items In bOld __ In naquhd. FOLIO NUIIBE!R8 IIItI8T II
PRlOVIDm. FCIl'InI oIdIII' IhBn 8 mtInth8 wi( require IIIIdIlkmll nM8W and apptOWI by the AddlaMfng
o-,-bllla&
~
..
-
Pl:llllON TYPE (Indlt;IIe fype ~ ~.. ..,.,.,. ArJt/IeBrJInr1 cMt:IdIst b'eaaft Pd10n IW8J
, '
BL (8IeIIr11 PBrd) ~ SOP (Stle DeveIapIrumt PIran)
8P (BaIt Daak em..Ion) SDPA (SOP "".)IId, ment)
~,....,I $OPl {InIubIlIIrdiII ~fD SDP)
cu (CondIb18I Use) B SIP ~ 1IDprDvIrment~)
EXP~NIIon Permit) , SIPl (InBubsfIdII Change fD SIP)
FP AId' 6NR ($net Name Chsnge)
UA(l..atUne ~ SNC (SIM8tN8m8~ - UnpIstIBd)
PMO ~NlmeCtBnge) TDR~_DcMdapment RIght&)
PPI. (PIInI & FlIt AaIBw) VA '~
~ PSP (P'I"'" SUbdlvlsbn PIIII) ~ ~ RerncMlI PetmI)
PlJI) RImne VRSFP =-~ & Sle FII Permit)
RZ(SIIIIMIIrd Remne) . ~
-.--
- .
I!!!
c.
J..EQAL 1E1aftIr. W uf 8IIbJBcl: propBJ'irClf prapeI1leI (copy atlsntllbYrtea..ft,IA:M msy be ~
OITYGAlC ~ CENTE~ 35 TOWNSHIP 48 RANGE 26
FOLIO ~ ID) MIMBER(sJ fA abcwe (fIIIst:h to, ar~ wlIh, 18gtIId&_/ptJon IfIllOl8 ~ one)
SEE ATTACHED UST '
SlREET,A'bDRS88 ar ADDRESSES (u pPpIGabIallfshsdy~
Se!A1T~UST
· LOCA1ION MAP must be ~ shoWIng exact Jocatbn of proJacIId'e In reIBtian to nearest public road rJght-
oHdy .
. SURVEY (capr .. needBd onlyfor' unpt&Ued propsrtles)
PROPoseD PROJECT NAME (lfepp/101Jbls)
orrv GATE COMtuERCE PARK
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (6 appIic&bhJ)
SITE DEVEl.OPMENT PlAN NUMBER (farf>>tfstJng ~ only)
SDP_"_ arAR#_
~
rn;.:IkYidsun fnlineering
2Srf G4 SOB4
04/12/201D 18:51
Agenda Item No. 17C
I58S P.lIJItWI>er 9,2010
Page 401158
~ .t.OOUNn'~
ADDRIIddtQ DEPAR'1'MBn'
WWWI!ftII -- -....
..9G
..~
. L't -:'t - "-
280D NORlti HORSESHOE DR1VI
NAPLES, FLORIDA 84104
(2S8) 2U-24OO FAX (~2IN714
.
PrQject Of "" 'l~ 118III88 ptaposad far. or ~ sppeaMg In. GOndomlnJum documerds (I( application;
1rdc8I8......~ ar 1IJdsUng)
-
- - IT IJ
PI8aae Check one: iii ChBaIdItlla to be Faxed back C PenIonaIIy P'JclGKt Up
APPI.ICMT lWIE: TOCIA HAMJ...fN. DAVIDSON ENGINEERING. INC.
PHON!~) 434008080 FAX ~ 4S4-SOB4
Signature on ~ ChBoIdist does not aonstftut8 Project and/or Street Name approval
l!UId Is subject to turther I8Yfew by the AddnM8ing Depaltmant. '
---
.. II!lIiI ~
..
. - ----
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
A.N Nunabot~1IBV) ~~ A:t\~ h.e.<1 ~ D \ '0 ~S ..
FoRo IIundIliIr
. FolIo NI8Uer
FolIo L.IN
Approved tsr-J2~ trL4a.1Y1
lJpciaBI ~ :
~- 1Lf.-(O
Date:
IF OLDER THAN 8 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
./:',\
--
Ii .'-;
'~'I
r6LA
, ' ;'j
.' "
." ,;,
-
FruII:Davidson ~
239 434 8OB4
04112/2010 18:&2
City Gate Polio t's:
Qtva.m~~IRe~ !tmaeo.Lom 1-1&
260950000I6
260P50001.
26OJSOOO125
26095000161
. 26095000183
26095000206
26095000222
2fi09SOOO248
26095OOQ264
2ti095OOD28O
26OJSOOO303
260P50DD329
26095OOOS4S
26095000361
2609SOOO3'14
2609S00038'7
"'Z-t; ot..f $ C> 00 '3a ., Lt
-z..G. 0 ~ S DO C>O L+ 4-
-z..c,& q >0 0 C:>O z..,g
"t... (po q 5r. 0 000 ~ 0
. -rr A. - t
""\LA--
~ e-~
Ckv Gaile l"-nnR'l!e"~ Ph
~ .........-- - ""'~:
PIovidiDg reacmJecI Plat Book md Pe,ge # bcoauBe to .
. 10 mmben meilot com.iD& up.
OIl Boot 4P PIp& 97-100 ~
~ q.. ~ Cat1lr "'aile ftree.. 08D81~
z..G, 0" 5 0 0 t..\.l.~ '"Z..
2.~~OOO ~c;c:o
'1-~O~SOoO' 4~4-
7-c,o~5000 so,
~oqsooo ~~
7_J.r:>o~ S 000 ~~q
"1.(PC~~OOO '5h5
-z,..Ls>O~50005~\
Z-V 0 '" ~ 000 (.poL\'
'2-~OG\:;OOD (p7,O
2,Ce>oq$,OOD (PCklp
-z...tp oc\ S 000 &,C# "Z...
2-Cb 0'1 $000 (t.;~~
. 1-(P (:) ~ S-0c.10 "1 0 I
~<&;.bq ,"0001(.,."
~D~!irooO "43
z..~o" ~ DoD 1 ee,'1
Agenda Item No. 17C
IS85 P. .....er 9, 2010
-1>ag'e 41 orS8
c.
c.
'1.J'.pOqsooo 7~S
-z.(pc:AS'"OO~ ~ ~
"UD cA$ooO C(; 1..Cf
"Zl.,oC\$OOO ~4D
-z..<t:,oqsoodi ~
"'UPoCfS 000 ~cu:. .
c.
.
.
--
,':;'. ::;~:'-'.,
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 42 of 158
ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT
PUD Amendment
PUDA-PI2010-845; CITY GAlE COMMERCE CENTER PUD
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally on this 8th day of July, 2010, appeared
ROGER R RICE, who to me is well known, and having been sworn and under oa1h, deposes and
states:
1. My name is ROGER B. RICE. I am over the age of twenty-one (21) years, and
otherwise sui juris, and have persona11mowledge of the facts contained herein.
2 I am a licensed attorney, Florida Bar Number 0752444, authorized to practire in the State of
Florida My business address is": 9010 Strada Stell Court, Suite 207, Naples, Collier County, Florida
34109. My business telephone nwnber is: (239) 593-1002. My business mailing address is: 9010
Strada Stell Court, Suite 207, NapleS, Florida 34109.
3. This Affidavit is given to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, in support of the Petition for a PUD Amendment (pUDA-PI2010-845; CITY GAlE
COMMERCE CEN1ER. PUD).
4. Citygate Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 850 NWN, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company, and CG n, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, are the
Owners of the PUD property, and collectively are the Developers of the PUD property.
5. The Affiant has examined company records of Citygate Developm~ LLC through
July 8, 2010, including but not limited to, the operating agreement, the articles of organization,
resolutions and company records of members, if any.
6. Citygate Development, LLC is organized, existing and in good standing under the laws of
the State of Florida
7. The Operating Agreement of Citygate Developm~ LLC provides that officers of the
company may be designated.
8. The members and manager have appointed Joseph R. Weber as Vice President of
Citygate Development, LLC, and Joseph R. Weber has full power and authority, in his capacity as
Vice President, to execute any and all doctm:lents necessary to effectuate the Petition for a Development
Order Amendment (pUDA-PI20l 0-845; CITY GATE COIMMERCE CENTER PUD).
9. The Affiant has examined company records of 850 NWN, LLC through July 8, 2010,
including but not limited to, the operating agreement, the articles of organization, resolutions and
company records of members, if any.
10. 850 NWN, LLC is organized, existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Florida.
11.
be designated
'The Operating Agreement of 850 NWN, LLC provides that officers of the company may
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 2
CITYGATECOMMERCECENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE: 7/12110
DUE: 8/11110
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 43 of 158
12 The managing I!lfnlbe1" and members have appointed Joseph R. Weber as Vice
President of 850 NWN, LLC, and Joseph R. Weber has full power and authority, in his capacity as
Vice President, to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the Petition for a Development
Order Amendment (pUDA-P1201 0-845; CITY GAlE COMMERCE CENTER PUD) on behalf of 850
NWN, LLC.
13. The Affiant has examined company records of CG II, LLC through July 8, 2010,
including but not limited to, the operating agreement, the articles of organization, resolutions and
company records of members, if any.
14. CO IT, LLC is organizerl, existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Florida.
15. The Operating Agreement of CG II, LLC provides that officers of the company may be
designated
16. The members and manager have appointed Joseph R. Weber as Vice President of CG
II, LLC, and Joseph R. Weber haS full power and authority, in his capacity as Vice President, to
execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate the Petition for a Development Order Amendment
(pUDA-Pl201O-845; CITY GAlE COMMERCE CENTER PUD) on behalf ofCG II, LLC.
17. Affiant further states that the infonnation contained in this Affidavit is, to the best
of his knowledge, true, correct: and current as of the date this Affidavit is given, except as otherwise
provided herein.
Witnesses:
~ agrvn Of L
itness #1
UV)((l It. L4rJ\hetl,
Print name of witness # 1
~~~
Witness #2
8eY\Q r--\. U~
Print name of witness #2
c.
c.
c.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 44 of 158
STAlE OF FLORIDA
.. CUJN1YOFmIllER
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 8th day of Ju1y~ 2010, by ROGER B. RICE,
who is personally known to me.
This instrument prepared by:
Roger B. Rice~ Esq.
Roger B. Rice, P.A
9010 Strada Stell Comt
Suite 207
Naples, Florida 34109
.=~~
STATE OF Ft.ORIDA
. . Comm# 000947324
Expires 312212014
.
--
PROPERTY In NUMBERS
City Gate Commerce Center Phase One (Lots 1-16):
2609500086
26095000109
26095000125
26095000167
26095000183
26095000206
26095000222
26095000248
26095000264
26095000280
26095000303
26095000329
26095000345
26095000361
26095000374
26095000387
26095000374
26095000044 TR R-l
26095000028 TR A
26095000060 TR R-2
City Gate Commerce Center Phase Two:
26095000442
26095000468
26095000484
26095000507
26095000523
26095000549
26095000565
26095000581
26095000604
26095000620
26095000646
26095000662
26095000688
26095000701
26095000727
26095000743
26095000769
26095000785
26095000808
26095000824
26095000840
26095000866
26095000882
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 45 of 158
c.
c.
City Gate Commerce
Center Phase Three:
00298160008
PUDA_PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGATE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE. TWO AND THREE
DATE: 517/10
DUE: 617110
c.
.
z
~~
::;;
I ~
:- ~
!!:. ~
~
l..
~
oq:
~
-~
Q
: ~
~ ~
c ~
If ~
:
~
(,)
.
Q
!II
5
(,)
oq:
l!!
~
-
I
00
:Jf/l
, .
8~~
~ !i~;
it ~!o
~ ~jl
i;
<11-
Ig
l.~
Pl~~ J.i
s-... 0-1;
dx Ir~
~~~ ~I
~:I:; I:
'K<II
.8l
3-
.,
1:::
S g
~~~;;;
ai:':li
li~,!..
8'~~ -t
Iro _
_ z
5:
~s
Boo
Jl~
-6;
:5
if
<II
~
-
1l(3
oq:
:
..:
:ll
.
g
~
~
~
~
..
l..
o
...
45
:f~
~~
..:
"au
II)
~
lL
lU
Z
o
I
..
~
$
I-- - I--
-
fll
5ili
2'_ .
CI'lli ."
. -
i~6
~.1
g cB
:0
-
- I--
~ ~
ol!s
is -
lil~
i .~ jli
eQ.
~~
-~
~ ;~
. o.!
"'~!:!' ~"..,
...0"" 00<110
a~;;;:t!;;;
::[~~ ,;~li:
nlli 511
iit >:~t
., . Z illi Z
.... i....
g <58
~ 10...
~ -
.... 0
I! " ~~i8
Ilo!S~ ~@Z
t-'" '8'" F Ii:::!
il~ f~;
l(Q.-I 'j~~t
::...... p:c
~Z !
I
-
~
---- -
~
s
-1---
N
!i
c;
N
...
45
..,
-
w
Z
o
o
@
5i
oo
~
; illl:~~ Il~
~ ~ ill ~ ~ Ii i~
.c 11; :5 I fz J
~::I :1 "!~
=. j"l rZ
liiIs
.!!!:~
~:~
.Jlio
:g>E'
.,.~.5
...",~
X'"
'"
:;;
oo!:i
...~~
.!Jlg
III ~
l-~.5
i
Ii
~
~
on
~
.,
lD
w
5
~I
~i
..
"'to
.3.3
-
i I ~
. I. ,~8-
l~= ~i~ . I~ .~~
~i~ II~ i~~j ~f~
i~-! l6xiJ. S~ :$i~~
rul) =w ,s -;5.&
l2;::g ~I:: cr;c 32
~:llD l:l i.;g.l~l
, Ii j, ~
Q
."
l!l
lier.,.
l.~~
rt).!!R
j~~
l! If .
!~I
(.)8
~
.
d~""
5<-2
.!f~~
e ~~
~dJ.
: .
ere/)
_0
,~~
...
l!
I,,;~-
1J'''f!
.0
lll'l!!
, .2.f~
~~I
;!~
i!
N
~~o_
i.!~~
€l.,;":'
.fxm~
-'Ie"
.!!~.~
~.i.l;
its:E=!
!8~.l:
:!!
X
~
Ii
&l
t?
-
oo
00
...
w
Z
o
-
W
Z
o
I
..,l!lg
~~S
~~~
o~~
:J~_
-'ffI.b
~"i!
t:.
~j5
:2J~
:il~~
J g
If]~i
ai~';~
~"O~ .
a,g;) 12
owUJ"!,
c:o .
i Z
~
00 g
~J~~
ZCl)N~
~. IllL
z]~i
O~A(I)-
Ill; l
o
'"
~
;;;
..;
:!!
00
~
Ii
lil
..
...
~
g
o
~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,lB~O
Page 4~~'$8
>w'"
.OQ
IX: Z
we(
~o
lI)w~
~:E~
ap:E .
oow
"-oozoo
o :t:....
~~m!2s~
<~~w .,
o....XI-W
iroo.~5
0~1
~o
8S
~~~
j~
lti!
J if..,
.:5
~~I'
~:i
a::w
'i",
..'"
11-
g~g I~
.....!:! l.l
~Jij ~;I
~ lDX .!6
..,~.s;o 'il 6'
-g~!i ~j~
'5",t .ceo
wI/) Q.~
lS - I-
e .,
.!I
."
I ~ g
CDRz:t .....
"if J!~~
gai~Nit
':1&!~i
clctJrn Q.
2 !
g
lii
I}l
f5
l!:l~ ~
I'S....-..~
I~~m~
ii1~~
~~."e/)i5.
o.~~ :!
~ i
'S
S>
o
~
'"
If
'i'
l
~
I
'f=
.~
!
I
~ I
8~Si! l~
-JM It!:!!
Iii ~l;
Ii. 1& 6
i!~ !jJ
.~f 11
J- ~-
S !
lIt;;;
cDw,:~
it'!!l ..
o~ lD-!
erS! ~
5:
'"
f/l~
~-
~if
~.... CO X
.&0
(.):1 .
wi
;
Ii
I:!
~
il
f
:!5
~
~
CIVil ENGINEERING · PLANNING · ENVIRONMENTAL
Agenda Item No. 17C
DOE~~
DAVIDSON ( .
ENGINEERING
"
Ms. Kay Deselem
Collier County Growth Management Division
Department of Land Development Services
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
PUOA-PL2010-84S Rev: 2
CnYGATECOMMERCECENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE: 7/12/10
DUE: 8/11/10
July 8, 2010
RE: PUDA-PL2010-845; CITY GATE COMMERCE CENTER PUD
r Review
Dear Ms. Deselem:
Included for your review are the following:
. Six (6) copies of this cover letter;
. Six (6) copies oithe Revised Ordinance;
. One (1) original and Five (5) copies of the Attorney's Affidavit;
. Three (3) CD's with electronic submittal documents;
The following responses are to the June 21,2010 review comments provided by you regarding the
above referenced project.
c.
LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ZONING REVIEW - Kav Deselem
1. Miscellaneous Corrections Needed: Please provide the disclosure and owner information
requested by the county attorney in the 6/3/10 email message.
Response: Ownership of City Gate Entities:
Citygate Development, LLC:
99% owned by the David L. Bre1UUln Trust -2003 Restatement.
1% owned by Ann A. Brennan Trust - 2003 RestatemenL
850 NWN, LLC:
99% owned by Exit 15 Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company.
1% owned by 500 Investment Company, LLC.
Exit 15 Development, LLC:
99% owned by Brennan Holdings, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
1% owned by the David L. Brennan Trust -2003 RestatemenL
BrenlUUl Holdings, LLC:
Owned by jive trusts: the David L. Brennan Trust -2003 Restatement and the Ann A.
Bremuzn Trust- 2003 Rest4tement own 42% and their family trusts own the remaining
58%.
c.
Page 1 of4
Revised
7/8/1 0
3530 Kraft Road. Suite 301 . Naples. Florida 34105 · Phone: 239.434.6060 . Fax: 239.434.6084
www 1I/''IVicic;nnFnaineerina.com
'.
.
--
Bremum Holdings, LLC: Owned by five trusts: the David L. Brennan Trust -2003
Restlltement and the Ann A. Brennan Trust- 2003 Restatement own 42% and their family
trusts own the renuzining 58%. .
David L Brennan and his wife, Ann A. Brennan, live at 850 Nelsons Walk, Naples,
FIori4ll34102.
COUNTY ATTORNEY - Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Miscellaneous Corrections Needed:
Please provide the additional ~ormation requested in the 6/3/1 0 email message.
1. Disclosures: Need % of ownership of individuals of corporate entities- Citygate
Development, LLC, etc. for CCPC and BCC conflict determinations
Response: See Response above.
2.
See minor revisions to proposed ordinance.
Response: The requested revisions have been made to the proposed ordinance. An e-
maU with the revised draft of the ordinance in Word format was sent to Assistant County
Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko on July 7,2010.
3.
Provide managing member detail for Sunsetview Management Co., LLC, an Ohio limited
liability company.
Response: Brennan Management Group, LLC is the manager of Sunset View
MalUlgement Co., LLC Joseph R. Weber is the Vice- President for both of these
companhs and authorized to sign on behalf of both companies.
4. Provide evidence that JosephR. Weber is authorized to sign for Citygate Development,
LLC and 850 NWN, LLC and CG II, LLC on Affidavit. Is he managing member of
Sunsetview Management Co., LLC?
Response: The Operating Agreement for Citygate Development, LLC and 850 NWN,
LLC and CG II, LLC specificaUy provide that officers of the companies may be named.
Joseph R. Weber has been properly named the Vree-President for all three companies
and has the authority to sign on behalf of these companies. See Attorney A.ffidavit
herewith and note that Joseph R. Weber signed the Developer Agreement on behalf of
850 NWN, LLC and CG II, LLC as their V:P.
5.
Please e-mail Word draft of ordinance.
Response: An e-mail with the revised draft of the ordinance in Wordformat was sent to
Assistant County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko on July 7,2010.
Page 2 of 4
Revised
7/8110
Agenda Item No. 17C
NOVer2010
11:]II 1158
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
ce
The followiml comments were received. are informational and/or mav include
stipulations:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Kav Deselem
1. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a complete application has
been submitted for review.
Response: Understood.
2. Please be advised that pursuant to the LOC, an application can be considered closed if
there has been no activity on'the application for a period of six (6) months. That six
months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Response: Understood.
Response: Understood.
3. Please ensure that all members of your review team that may testify before the CCPC and the
Bce are registered as lobbyists pursuant to the county regulations regarding that issue.
Response: This has been accomplished.
4. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your responses
to each comment. Include a response to all comments. Please put revised dates on all
exlnbits and in the title block of the Master Plan. PUD documents without revision dates and
a "page x of y" notation on each page may be rejected. Plans without title block revision
dates may be rejected.
ce
Response: This cover letter and all exhibits/plans comply with these requests.
5. Please provide electronic copies of the documents and exhibits (Word or jpg, as
appropriate).
Response: An electronic copy of the documents and exhibits is provided herewith. An e-
maU with a draft of the ordinance in Word format was sent to Assistant County Attorney
Heidi Ashton-Cicko on July 7,2010.
6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to
ALL review comments.
Response: Understood.
ce
Page 3 of 4
Revised
7/8/10
.,;" ~-~'''. .~<"~. ".
'.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Ef158
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
7. The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) for this petition has been scheduled for June
30,2010. Public hearings cannot be held until the NIM requirements have been met. Please
note the following information for the NIM: Note: Meeting was rescheduled for July 13,
2010 because of Naples Daily News error publishing the legal notice of the NIM.
a. You will need to provide the required affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting
(in compliance with the LDC); and
Response: TM affido.vit and its attachments were sent to. Kay Deselem on 6/28/10.
b. You may need to post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location if the site is
large enough that there could be confusion; and
Response: Acknowledged.
c. You need to ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working
for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working
portable microphone; and
Response: Acknowledged.
.
d. Due to county staff reductions, you, as the agent, need to provide a written synopsis of
the meetin2 as well as providing theaudio/video tape; and
Response: Acknowledged.
e. Please prepare docmnents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file,
that show the differences in the uses 1hat would be allowed in the existinv and pro.posed
zoning districts. This request is based upon recent cepe direction.
Response: Acknowledged.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me directly @ 239-
434-6060 ext. 2969.
Sincerely,
I ~ At/lwL
~~~
~ Project Manager
cc: via e-mail:
Heidi Ashton. Asst. County Attorney
Applicant: 850 NWN, LLC, CG II, LLC & Citygate Development, LLC
--
Page 4 of4
Revised
7/8110
Kay Deselem, AlCP, Principal Planner
COMPANY:
CC Zoning Services--Land
Development Services Department
ADDRESS:
2800 N Horseshoe Drive
Naples FL 34104
(Via Courier)
TO:
RE:
City Gate Commerce Center
Phases One, Two & Three
PUDA-PI201 0-845 &
DOA-PI201 0-843
e
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 51 of 158
TRANSMITT AL
FROM:
Tocia Hamlin for Josh Froth
DATE:
JULY 16,2010
PHONE NUMBER:
(239) 252-2931
YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
o ATIACHED 0 FORREVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE
Kay:
The following are enclosed from the NIM held on July 13th:
. One (1) CD including the:MP3 Recording file of the meeting, copy of the sign in
sheet, copy of the handout and copy of the meeting notes;
. One (1) hard copy of all items listed above excluding the MP3 file.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional @ 239-434-6060 ext.
2969.
Thanks
Cc: Roger Rice, City Gate Development, LLC via email
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301' Naples, Florida 34105' Phone: 239.434.6060' Fax: 239.434.6084
www.davidsonenaineerina.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
c.
c.
c.
.
Summary of
Neighborhood Information Meeting
for
City Gate Commerce Park
PUDA-PL2010-845 & DOA-PL2010-843
July 13, 2010
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 52 of 158
Kay Deselem representing Collier County introduced herself and City Gate Commerce
Park's attorney Roger Rice. Ms. Deselem explained the NIM process. Ms. Deselem also
explained that the meeting is being recorded. Those in attendance were asked to fill out
the Sign-In-Sheet.
Roger Rice introduced himself. The following are the points he discussed:
.
Mr. Rice explained that at a Neighborhood Information Meeting, a landowner is
usually explaining proposed changes in the uses or proposed changes in the amount of
development, oi'both. That is not the case for this meeting as the proposed changes for
City Gate Commerce Park are just environm~ta1 and do not affect the land uses
approved for or amount of development approved in City Gate Commerce Park.
Mr. Rice noted that County Regulations require a Neighborhood Information
Meeting to explain proposed changes, even if the PUD changes are minor.
Mr. Rice informed the public that the 1988 City Gate Commerce Park PUD
ordinance and 1990 City Gate Commerce Park DRI Development Order contained
provisions regarding an endangered species, specifically red cockaded woodpeckers (aka
RCW)
Mr. Rice advised that the developers of City Gate Commerce Park received a
federal permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in July 2009 and that that federal
permit incorporated the latest RCW mitigation and management strategies, which have
changed over the last 20 years.
Mr. Rice opined that it was the County's Policy that a Federal Permit takes
precedence over the local permits with regard to endangered species and other
environmental matters.
Mr. Rice stated that City Gate's federal permit mitigation and management
strategies were presented to and unanimously recommended by the County's
Environmental Advisory Committee.
Mr. Rice also informed the public that City Gate's conservation efforts have been
praised by environmental groups; specifically the Collier Audubon Society and the
Florida Wildlife Federation.
Mr. Rice described advances in RCW conservation, specifically in the use of
artificial cavities and the relocation ofRCWs to better habitat.
Mr. Rice told how City Gate's RCW mitigation efforts began in 2004 and that
City Gate bas relocated 21 juvenile RCWs to artificial recruitment clusters established in
thp. P'l'Jnnmp. !':fnInil !':h:ltp 'Rn...~t J.J.. nnt..A tl...+ th....._ Df""UT 1..^.... ~~_~ s::..~_
Summary of
Neighborhood Information Meeting
for
City Gate Commerce Park
PUDA-PUOI0-845 & DOA-P12010-843
July 13, 2010
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 53 of 158
ce
Mr. Rice announced that City Gate will construct Florida's 1 st privately-funded
wildlife crossing. This panther crossing is to be built east of Immokalee in rural Collier
County on a road that has long been deadly for Florida panthers. Constmction of this
wildlife crossing is to begin in late November of this year.
Mr. Rice told the audience that in January, City Gate began developing its Phase
Two Plat That the roads, water, sewer, storm drainage, and public utilities are expected
to be finished this summer.
Mr. Rice advised that in advance of the Phase Two Plat, a Developer Contribution
Agreement with Collier County was completed. As part of that Agreement, City Gate
made substantial commitment of money intended for improvements to Collier Boulevard
(between Davis Blvd. and the Golden Gate Main Canal) as well as the segment of Davis
Blvd. from Radio Road to Collier Blvd.
Mr. Rice advised the neighbors to the north of City Gate that City Gate has not
done any clearing along or near our north boundary. The clearing that has taken place in
that area has been done by either Collier County or the South Florida Water Management
District. Recently, the South Florida Water Management District cleared the southern
bank of the canal for canal maintenance. This was done in the canal easement, which is
not on City Gate property. In 200 1 Collier County cleared a 50 foot wide path along the
northernmost 50 feet of City Gate for the installation of a raw water transmission line
which would service the South Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant and graded it
with limerock for the County's maintenance vehicles.
Mr. Rice told the audience that in the next few months City Gate will be planting
a landscape buffer, along the northern portion of the Phase Two Plat, which will be
comprised of 110 - 8' to 10' live oaks, 55 - 8' to 10' green buttonwoods, 22 - 8' hollies
and 616 - 3' - hedge materials
Mr. Rice wrapped up his presentation and asked for any questions.
ce
The following questions were presented by the public after Mr. Rice finished his
presentation. Each question is followed by a summary of the answer and or additional
comment:
Question #1: Will the County's Easement (20' CUE, which is 10 feet south of City
Gate's northern boundary) be paved I blacktopped?
Answer: Mr. Rice explained that the County's easement (ten feet from City Gate's
northern boundary, from the FPL easement to City Gate's east boundary)
wa.q for the Countv'!:: raw water transmission line and that easement
.'.
Summary of
Neighborhood Information Meeting
for
City Gate Commerce Park
PUDA-PL2010-845 & DOA-PL2010-843
July 13, 2010
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 54 of 158
vehicles. It is not a public road, was not intended to be used by the public
and will not be paved.
Question #2: The audience expressed the concern that a lot of A TV' s~ trucks,
"d~oliti.on cars"~ etc. were using the County's Easement (20' CUE~
which is ten feet south of City Gate's northern boundary) at "all hours of
the night" The audience asked if there was anything that City Gate could
do to stop, this traffic.
Answer: Mr. Rice stated that any res1riction of the County's easement would need
to involve the County. He further advised that City Gate had been
contacted by Collier County Public Utilities regarding blocking/gating this
easement to prevent public traffic and that City Gate fully supports the
gating of this easement to prevent non-maintenance traffic~ but the County
has not pursued this. Mr. Rice promised to provide the complaining
attendees the contact information for the County staff member (he could
not recall his name) at Collier County Public Utilities, who was
responsible, and urged those attendees to contact him.
.
Question #3:
Answer:
Will there be a building for the Weir on its south side (City Gate)?
No. The SFWMD is building this Weir (Golden Gate Weir #3). The
location was noted on an aerial (approximately 2000 feet east of Collier
Boulevard). The Weir is to provide better flood control and to slow
freshwater discharges to the downstream (Gordon River). City Gate
understands that the SFWMD plans to build a small pre-cast hydraulic
building on the north side of the Weir (on the Golden Gate Estates
property that the SFWMD purchased for the construction of the Weir).
Question #4: When will landscaping start?
Answer: City Gate hopes to start in late August.
Question #5: Will a building be built on the lot (phase Two Plat lot I) across from Safe
Harbor?
Answer: Yes. All the lots are being developed to be sold and to have buildings
built on them. The land uses for Phase Two Plat lots are primarily light
industrial and office. This portion of City Gate has a two acre minimum,
which ensures a substantial investment by lot purchasers and promotes
quality buildings. There is also architectural control.
--
Question #6: Ms. Deselem asked Mr. Rice "Where is the landscaping requirement
coming from?"
Page 3 of 4
Swnmary of
Neighborhood Information Meeting
for
City Gate Commerce Park
PUDA-PL20l0-845 & DOA-PL20l0-843
July 13, 2010
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 55 of 158
c.
Answer:
Mr. Rice responded that buffer requirements were contained in the PUD.
He also pointed out that the approved Phase Two Plat plans include the
landscape buffer details.
Question #7: Where will the landscaping buffer go at this time?
Answer: The limits are the western extent and eastern boundary of the Phase Two
Plat.
Question #8: Is there any residential on City Gate?
Answer: No.
Question #9:
Answer:
Will there be some type of fencing between City Gate and White Lake?
No fencing is planned. However, there willbe a landscape buffer
constrocted as part of the Phase Two Plat, but this will not be as
substantial as the landscape buffer along City Gate's northern boundary.
There are smaller landscape buffer requirements between two properties
zoned industrial (like City Gate Commerce Park and White Lake
Corporate Park) than between an industrial zoned property and residential
(City Gate Commerce Park and Golden Gate Estates).
c.
Question #10: Will there be a road next to White Lake Corporate Park? Or a [an
additional] road connection between the two properties?
Answer. No to both questions. The only road connection between these two
projects is and will be the existing road, White Lake Boulevard.
After no further questions were asked, Ms. Deselem reminded all in attendance that this
meeting and the public hearing process is the public's chance to be involved. She also
reminded everyone that if they had any further questions to contact her or the agent for
the owner. Mr. Rice also offered to respond to any questions made directly to his office.
Meeting ended at approximately 6: 1 Opm.
c.
Page 4 of 4
o
z
-
Iii
w
:&
z
o
~ i~
:i ._
. a: z \J...
2z~
z ' " \~
--u-
fII.
a
o
o
:J:
a=
o
IG
:c
e
-
lU
Z
.
-e
:z
2
rr
~
\D
)-G
\-i
13
G
0'
...
a
li:
CD
c
i
:!5
Q.
W
en
~
~
Q.
w
8J
IS
c
cc
..J
<
=i
w
a: _
w C")
In 0-
2 ~
.::I . N
~ ~
g ~
D..
(I)
I
Q
~
t:i
w
i=
en
w
t
z
~
o
-
~
('f)
~
LL.
CIl
Q)
a.
o
z
,
8
,
Gi ~
~ l"
\,
~
.!I? ~
8 ~
@) \
E (\
: .~ ~
iJ ~
~l
.:fit.
~
~
'"
~
\
It'-
l'4'\
N
~
J
...
'\.
.
...:
o
Q)
o
.c:
CD
~
o
::J:
Z
o
o
~
..
"
'"
"
:a
-
V)
~
c:
:>
o
U
E
Q)
<D
03
a
>-
:S
Neighborhood Information
Meeting
City Gate Commerce Park
July 13, 2010
Agenda Item No. 17C
NEiGHBORHOOfl ~f 158
INFO'RM4TION MEETING,
The publicls invited to attend a ileIghborhood Information .
meeting held by tne property owne", 850 NWN, LLC, '00'11;
LLC & CItyGate Development Inc., represented by, Roger
B., Rice, Esquire and Josh Fruth of Davidson engineering
Inc.
to
our
Neighborhood
July 13, 2010 4>> 5:30 p.rn. at
Fairfield 1m. Lobby
3808 White Lake Blvd.
Naples, FL 34117
The subject property Is ~87:t acres in size and Is located
at the intersection of CoRier Boulevard (OR 9511 and City
Gate Boutevard North in Section 35, To"'(fl5hlp 49 East,
Range 26 South. CollIer County, Florida
"':"!\- F"
~~:i\l\ ·
c \'. ....
. ';..' '\ _ ,,' f
. '~.<' \ ..~.....!
.:" , .<1
'I" ,
~.- . . :.
, ," ,I,. ,:'"
'Z ~~:~:. .:~~~~.,.
, :--" '~:' I
Welcome.
We appreciate your coming
Infonnation Meeting. Our
people will explain that the
'-:;"'.\.f',
,
,:1 .
"
changes in the development
. .;
..(. . f ~.
pennit being proposed do not
I
. ~
change the uses or amount of
development in City Gate.
The development permit is
being changed only to make
the
state
and
local
The property owners, 850 NYiN. 1Lc. co II. .LLC & CitY-
Gate Dev~opment Ine,;, are requesting amendments to the
City Gate DRI Development Order and to the City Gate C0m-
merce Center Planned United Development (PUD). The DRI
Amendment seeks to conform to the CIty Gate Habitat Con-
servation Plan and the City Gate Federal Fish and Wildlife
Permit. The amendment is to the City Gate DR! Development
Order 90-4 [Collier County Resolution It 9Q-4311. Section 4
entitled Vegetation and Wildlife/WetJands, in particular para-
graph c entitled Off-site Mitigation and paragraph d entitled
Red COckaded Woodpecker Management plan. The PUD
amendment ~kS to amend Ordinance No. 88-93 to remove
Section VII, entitled Red, Cockaded Woodpecker ManaQe:-
ment Plan, to recognize that said Management P.Ian has
been reviseQ to conform to the City Gate Habitat Conserva-,
lion Plan and the City Gate Federal Fish and WIldlife Permit.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors are
welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project
with the owner/developer and Collier County staff. If you are
unable to attend thls meeting but have queStions or com-
ments, they can be directed by mail, phone. fax or e-mail by
July 13, 2010 to:
Kay Deselem, A1ep. Principal Planner
Zoning Services--land Development Services Department
2800 N Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104
Phone: (2K39)D252-1293@1;FIax:(.'(239)252-6357,.
' ay ese em co lel'gov.net
City Gate Commerce Center Phase One, Two and Three
DOA-PL2010-843 & PUDA-PL201 0-845
.
requirements conform to
recently imposed federal
requirements
regarding
wildlife.
No, 231172738
JulY 1 2010
....
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
TRANSMITTAL
TO:
JUN 30 .
FROM:
Tocla Hamlin for Josh Froth
....... -.. -.-
:KaY I>eselem,AICP,priocip~ll?lanne.r,
COMPANY:
CC Zoning Services--Land
Development Services Department
ADDRESS:
2800 N Horseshoe ~ve
Naples FL 34104
(Via Comier)
DATE:
JUNE 28, 2010
PHONE NUMBER:
(239) 252-2931
RE:
YOUR. REFERENCE NUMBER:
City Gate Commerce Center
Phases One, Two & Three
PUDA-PUOI0-845 &
DOA-PI2010-843
.
o ATTACHED 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE
Kay:
We were required to revise the Neighborhood Information Meeting date due to the Naples
Daily News not advertising the ad. The new meeting date will be July 13, 2010. Attached
are the following items:
· One (1) original signed and notarized Affidavit of Compliance;
· One (1) copy of the "New" NIM: Property Owner Notification letter;
· One (1) copy of the mailing labels;
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional @ 239-434-6060 ext
2969.
Thanks
-e
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301 . Naples, Florida 34105' Phone: 239.434.6060' Fax: 239.434.6084
www.davidsonenoineerina.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 59 of 158
I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development
Code, I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and or condominium and civic
associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes for the City
Gate Commerce Center Phases One, Two and Three applications (DOA-PL2010-843 &
PUDA-PL2010-845) at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting
For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be
deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or
entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained
the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of
a Neighborhood Information Meeting.
c.
Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this
Affida~tof=pliance (~;JI- ~~
(Sign of Applicant)
State of Florida
County of Collier
(.
The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this b day of
JlJ\'le _ ,2010 by JOSYuCk f(U~ . who is personallr
m~~;~c~ ~id~tifi~oa
(Signature of Notary pUOliC) ~
\txJfA t\1 \Y\ \ \ ()
Printed Name of Notary
(Notary Seal)
TOOIA HAMLIN
MY COMMISSION I DO 684747
, ~1fi!8: Jijy1, 2011
._ .. _~'lbu~_fIu!*~
c.
.
.
--
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 60 of 158
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
Dear Property Owner:
June 25, 2010
Due to an error in advertising by the newspaper, we are required to re-schedule the Neighborhood Information
Meeting which was originally scheduled for June 30, 2010. The new meetin~ date is Julv 13.2010: see further
infonnAuon below.
Please be advised that the sender has made formal applications to Collier County requesting an amendment to
the City Gate DRI Development Order and the City Gate Commerce Center Planned Unit Development
(PUD). The DR! Amendment seeks to conform to the City Gate Habitat ConselVation Plan and the City Gate
Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit. The amendment is to the City Gate DRI Development Order 90-4 [Collier
County Resolution # 90-431], Section 4 entitled Vegetation and WildlifelWetlands, in particular paragraph c
entitled Off-site Mitigation and paragraph d entitled Red. Cockaded Woodpecker Management plan. The PUD
amendment seeks to amend Ordinance No. 88-93 to remove Section VII, entitled Red Cockaded Woodpecker
ManagementPJan, to recognize thal said Management Plan has been revised to conform to the City Gate
Habitat'Conservation Plan and the City Gate Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit The subject property is 287::1:
acres in size and is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and City Gate Boulevard North in
Section 35, Township 49 East. Range 26 South, Collier County, Florida.
Ii'
I. "-'.~'.' I
. 1~;~'.. .~:
'~.. "".
\ ,,-
~ '-S-~:T T:~- -"!
I I
11
:1
J
l
, \- '
.w_1
., -
I
i
i
'\ '
Z'~~-'
i,,,\ I.
-",
, '.
I
L ,
......-
t~ --~
If
::.~
'c,.. I
+~~,'~~~l"
,.-
".-
"
f ~~
In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our amendment request and to give you an
opportunity to influence the form of development intended, we are holding a Neighborhood Information
Meeting on Julv 13.2010 at the Fairfield Inn, Lobby located at 3808 White Lake Blvd. The meeting will begin
at 5:30 p.m. As noted above, this has been re-scheduled from the original date of June 30, 2010.
At this meeting we will make every effort to illustrate how we intend to develop the property. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at (239) 434-6060 ext 2969 or via e-mail at;oshaV.davidsonenlZineerinlZ.comifyou have
any questions regarding the meeting or the proposed project
Sincerely yours,
J~ FrwH-v
Josh Froth
Project Manager
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301- Naples, Florida 34105 - Phone: 239.434.6060.Fax: 239.434.6084
www.davidsonengineerlng.com
Jse.Avery.eTempIate 5160.
fCF A TIER, GERI M
fCFAlTER, GLEB
flLTONNOVICH
150 SAFE HARBOR DR
rAPLES, FL 34117-8407
TGO OVA THI
660 31ST AVE SW
lAPLES, FL 34117-8456
)RBEGOSO, LUIS & CONNIE
230 31ST AVE SW
~APLES, FL 34117-8448
tAY, RALPH THOMAS &
~HRISTINE
,170 SAFE HARBOR OR
~APLES, FL 34117-8407
;HA W TRS, RALPH & BONNIE
~ONNIE SHAW REV TRUST
Jm 01/28/98
:520 31ST AVE SW
-lAPLES, FL 341 ]7-8454
iTEINMANN, JOSEPH E &
)ANIELLE
1516 31ST AVE SW
~APLES, FL 34117-8454
ITITF/ST OF FL
Vo DEP DOUGLAS BLDG
3900 COMMONWEALlH BLVD
r ALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-6575
VICTORIA ESTATES LID ET AL
S441 COOPER CREEK BLVD
ONNERSITY PARK, FL 34201-2006
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA
CMC ASSOC INC.
A TIN: PETER GADDY, PRESIDENT
PO BOX 990596
NAPLES, FL 341 ] 6-6002
Etiquettes faciles a peter
Utilisez Ie gabarit AVERYCil 5160@
I
1
feed Paper
expose Pop-Up Edge TN 1
MCGINN, JOHN & JOANNE A
1606 CHAVEZ CT
LADY LAKE, FL 32159-8769
NICHOLAS TR., DEBORAH C
NICHOLS REALTY INC
PROFIT SHARING PLAN TRUST
1475 OSPREY AVE
NAPLES, FL 34102-0000
PWVER GROUP PROPERTIES LLC
4480 7TH AVENUE NW
NAPLES, FL 34119-4034
SAFE HARBOR
] ]65 CLAM CT
NAPLES, FL 34102-0562
SOUTH FL WATER MGMT OIST
PO BOX 24680
3301 GUN CLUB RD
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406-3007
THALHE~ SANFORD C &
ERIKKA
3210 31ST AVE SW
NAPLES, FL 34117-8448
URlKA ill INC
567 PARKWOOD LN
NAPLES, FL 34103-8534
VOCISANO, ROBERT
VOCISANO, MARIO
4100 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY
NAPLES, FL 34116-6522
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC OF
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, INC. -
A TTN: DOUG RANKIN
2335 T AMlAMI TRAlL #308
NAPLES, FL 34103
I
I
I
!
..
Sens de
mamp.m...nt
Repliez it Ia. hachure afin de i
reveler Ie reborel POp-UpTM 1
~...",.......,. - uvuu. .
Agenda Item No. 17C l
METZGER Tti~ P.ciCRDfA M
D P & R M METf~1:e8rR.UST
UTD 08112/02
3810 31ST AVE SW
NAPLES, FL 34117-8460
OLSZEWSKI, EDWARD J
3190 SAFE HARBOR DR
NAPLES, FL 34117-8407
RAI RESTAURANTS INC
450 S ORANGE A VB 10TH FL
ORLANDO, FL 32801-3383
c.
SHAW BLVD LLC
25190 BERNWOOD DR
BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135-7846"
SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT CORP
324 SW 16m ST
BELLE GLADE, FL 33430-2824
TIB BANK
PO BOX 2808
KEY LARGO, FL 33037
VACHA, JOHN & ANN
3760 31ST AVE SW
NAPLES, FL 34117-8458
WHITE LAKE COMMONS ASSOC
INC % COMPASS GROUP
7400 TRAIL BLVD sm 101
NAPLES, FL 34108-2855
WORKMAN, DEBORAH A
3190 31ST AVE SW
NAPLES, FL 34117
www.avery.com
1-8DO-GO-AVERY
c.
c.
'se Avery'" Template 5160. l N!eCI t'aper expose Pop-Up Edge™ 1 ~.-.....&,. - 0VV\Il- ." .
Agenda Item No. 17C "
_~2010
50NWNlLC ANNUEZ ~ GILBERT ARREAGA, C f 158
)10 STRADA SlELL CT STE 207 , 3500 318T AVESW#28 VERONICA R
3180 SAFE HARBOR DR
APLES, FL 34109-4427 NAPLES. FL 34117-8454 NAPLES. FL 34117-8407
'.
A VEl{, Wll..LIAM D. BELLO. PEDRO L & JUANA L CANBERRA INVESTMENTS, LLC
780 31 ST AVENUE SW 14090 SW 36111 ST 3565 PLOVER A VB
APLES, FL 34117-0000 MIAMI. FL 33175-6719 NAPLES, FL 34117-8412
G n LLC CHM NAPLES HOTEL PARlNERS, CI1YGATEDEVELOPMENT, LLC
LLC % CHARTWELL HOSPITALITY
59 S MAIN ST STE 500 2000MERIDIANBL VDSlE200 159 S MAIN ST STE 500
KRON. OH 44308-1300 FRANKLIN, 1N 37067-6361 AKRON. OH 44308-1300
OLLIER COUNTY CUS~ STEPHEN C EDIXON, WILLIAM J
USA I EDIXON
301 TAMlAMl TR E 3210J.1 A VB SW 3330 31ST AVE SW
rAPLS, FL 34112-4961 . NAPLES, FL 34117-8448 NAPLES, FL 34117
PRO-1I01 LLC ET AL GABLE ill, CHARLES I GJOFRIDA, PHILIP J & MADELINE
01 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2050 CHRISTINE R CLA VELIN-GABLE 3840 31ST AVE SW
3170 31ST AVE SW
.oS ANGELES, CA 90017-5725 NAPLES. FL 34117-8409 NAPLES, FL 34117-8460
l. Ln<. DREW T & LINDA A moos, WILliAM T msCOx, SAMUEL M & Ln..LIANA
510 31ST AVE SW 3050 HORSESHOE DRIVE N STE 3290 3]ST AVE SW
]05
rAPLES, FL 34117-8448 NAPLES, FL 34] 04-7908 NAPLES, FL 341 ] 7
rOULE, ARMOND J 1-75 ASSOCIATES LLC KEISEL, GLENN L & MAURINE
006 SE 11 TH A VENUE 570 DELAWARE AVE 3016 S RIDGE RD W
:APE CORAL, FL 33904-5134 BUFFALO, NY ]4202-1206 ASHTABULA, OH 44004-906]
JNGSTOWN FAMILY TRUST I LAKE LINCOLN LLC LEVINS, BARRY KENT
,LC 3050 HORSESHOE DRNE N STE
21 1ST AVEN 105 1850 S RIDGE DR
1lNNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-0000 NAPLES, FL 34104-7908 LONG LAKE, MN 55356-8903
,EWIS JR, WALLACE L LICON, MA SOCORRO RUELAS LUCKY INVESTMENTS INC.
1ARIAN H LEWIS GERACE
120 SW 74TH A VB 6017 PINE RIDGE RD #308 344 HERON A VB
1IAMI, FL33413-17 NAPLES, FL 34] 19-3956 NAPLES, FL 34108-2116
~ILA POND ROAD DEV CO MANA TEE PROPERTY MANG SW MARTIN, ROLAND & JUDY
INC PACHNER
\. 12 MaE RD sm 50 10 NEWBURY PL 3530 31ST AVE SW
OUTHFIELD, MI 48034-1774 NAPLES, FL 34119-3956 NAPLES, FL 34117-8454
:tlquettes faelles a peler .L Repllez a Ia hachure afjn de i www.avery.com
Jtllisez Ie aabarit AVERvtl 511in~ Sens de rAuAIA" 1_ _..._.....a h__ II_TM , .. """ft._ __ ....__...
Co~8T County
- ~--
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 63 of 158
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT~ OF ZONING & lAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COlUERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH (iORS[:SHOE DRivE
NAPLES; FLORIDA 3M 04
(239) 252-24QO J:AX (239) 643-6968
c.
PRE-APPUCA TION MEETlNG NOTES
D PUD Rezone (PUDZ)
o PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ..A)
~ PUD Amendmenf (PUDA)
PL# OtO'\O ~b~2..
I)~te: -=t.12B( \ 0 TIme: ('. ( S- Firm: """bA..V I DGOt-.J, f.J.Jb IN ~ I N C; ,
Project NQ~ C~ 0\A--r-:6:.. f U D Size of project Site: acres
Appncant Name: --30LI A w'Al---ll I ,....J Phone: 33 q: <-f"rx:o
Owner Name:
Phone:
Owner Address:
Ex~sting PUD Name and Number LIT"-r" ~Tl::.
Assign,d Planner_~l'''i b~ lo,f'Y\
Meeting Mendees: (attach Sign-ln sheet)
City state
ZIP
c.
Meeting Notes
..P\bD~~\ ~G ': ~ l-A
Ef>G ku....;~o6t cequlO?d
~ Cuctot> s ~ . ' " d4,~'cA-.s ;f- ~-k,-,
f.? lVI/I ~DI1 fH).~ <( f --<r .<.:l ~ ~ :1' L ~,",hLJ;4if), - ~. .'.: .. { f? (u....... Her ; I I
~fe():o..,')'vR~. '+lz r.-e.J'''J';' nc.'-V S..eC.-{lcJ,"v
p U f) r)o c.-Jrrv-v1...
..b
. ~
.{'VUl"'1 h
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGATE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, lWO AND THREE
DATE: 517/10
DUE: 617/10
c.
'.
{?p15
.
-e
: ."."'-." .....
COLUER COUNTY GO~NlViENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 64 of 158
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPW:St FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252~2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUD ~!:ZONE {POD I)'
PUD to PUD REZONE (PUt)Z-A)
PUG AMENDMENT (PUDA)
APP~ICATio'N sUBMmAL (HEtKUST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST 1$ :rO ~E SUBMm'ED WITH APPlICA rlON P ACJ{ET IN THE EXA(:T ORDER L(STED BELOW
wJcoVER s.-rs ArTACHED. TO EAcH SECTION.
REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: INCOMPLETESUMBl'rTALS WILL NdT BE ACCEPTED.,
'# PFREQ.UIRED NOT
COPIES REQUIRED
STANDARD uQUlREMENTs:,
1 Ad~ifiDn~1 set If tQcated In the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
RedevetoDmenI Area) , '
1 Addiiio.nal &el for School Bocird Review (If contains residential comDonenfs)
COpies of detailed descrlptfan oJ Why amendment ~' necessary
ComJilti1ed A ..;;.h-tton, (dovmloacf from webstte ~r current fOrm),
Pre-,aJ:lolic:atkJl'lm8etWl riciIeS
PUD Doc::umetnt & Cpnamtval Site Pldn 24" x'3e'" and One B lh" x. 11" COpy
· . , '1 SIte Plan 24" x 3.6tiand One 8 V2"K11" CODY
Or!g~a1 p~ r:Iociipent ahd Master Plan ~4" " 30010
ONL'l if AM!NDJNG THE PUD.
Revised. PUP cb:ument wtih c:hanges crosse.d ,fhru &: underfmed
~eY'ised PUP docunenlwlOll'iended 11tle'Daae- w lord #'$, we 10.0213.A.2
Deeds!LeqaJ's l ~y Uf ~uru;Jaty of origlnal' PuD is amended)
Ust 'tdentIfYa,;g Ovmer.l' c;rU pai1~' 9f corporation
Owner /Affldavlt sig,.ed & ~~d
(;;oVenant oHhifled CCmtroI
Completed Aclcfresstng dJedCli~
!:rivb'bilinen1Ol' Impaci StatemeJ'!t'lElS) '" ~r exeir!pti~ Ju$tifkation
,DlgifulNleC:tronlc copy of ElS,
l1isti:!tical S~ey or' waIVer request
Ufality ~rOVIst~ Stateni8nt ~L_..4..a'~ .
ArchtfectYrt'!,1 rend.ertng of proposed str.ucfUr-~
SUrVe.y~ Slgtil:td l se~led (ne MOr-e. M ~ ,. bMo rJA ')
Traffic impaCt StQl~ (TIS} or waiver (with oppnq:Ibl~ fees) ,/
CoP)' of rrqfflc: Jmp~ct s.tatement (TIS) on COROM
Aerial p~ (ta!t'e~ within the previous 12 months min. sepled 1 "::;2001.
showlnci R.Utcs Codes, legen~ and !)rolect boundary
Bectronk: CQPY of Qa docum~JnWord formtrt and plans (CORom or Diskette)
JOstIflcatfon/Ratloncile fOr the Devit:!,tlons '(must be on a separate sheet within the
oP'Phcatian materlafs DO NOT inciude It ill the PUD documents)
Copies of OfficiallnterpretaliOl1Jond!Dr 4~ine Verifications
v
V
{,,;. ~W
tA 24
l:. '9....
"~lJi"
vk
'2(.
y
V'"
\/
./
'V
V
\/
~
24.
3
2
2
2
3)...
2
1
4:
4
4
4
7
3
v.
/'
V
-C/'
.J
v
.~
"-
/
J"
V
V
,/
V
5
d,
3'
:::J "'
v
~
\/
..../
v
Colter County
~ ~-~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 65 of 158
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
OI;PT. OF ZONING & LANO DEVElOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.CO~GOV.NET
2800 NORTH I1PRSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FlORIDA 3410,4
(239) 252-2400 FAX (2a9) 643-6968
c.
j)
Affordable Housina. or Economic D.evelpp~1 CounCl1 ttrojedS:
o EDt..Fast Trade" must sUbmit approved copy of officiC!1
oppl1caflon '
o AHordoble M~ "Expedited" must submit copy of signed
Cett1flcate of Agreement.
f project includes an Affordabie HaustnQ component, you are required to sch~ - '
meetlng befoce the Affordable Houslng Advisory Committee by cantoding the
itier Caun Houslnoncl Human Services De. artn!ent of ~39-252-2273.
~. 1f,Iocated in RFMU rRural Frino& Mixed Use~. R~celvlna Land Areas
Appl1i::ant mliIt contact Mr. Gerry J. lac:avera, State of Florida
oMslon of Forestry @ 239.,6~35QO fOr InformatiOn regarding
I-Wildfire Mitigation & flrevention fllan", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.,2.a.(/:)}Lc.
Jj ~ If Ioa:rted within ~, mile of .city of Nool~s. send CODY of submittal DOckaoe to:
Robin SInger, ptOnning Director
City of Naples
295 R'iverside Orde, Naples, FL 341 02
Fees: Application Feel 0 $10,000 (PUD Rezone) + $25 per acre (or fraction l)f thereof)
~ $$,009 (PUb to PUDJ '+ $~5 per a~e (or fradion thereof) ,
jP' $6,000 ',PUD Amendment) r. .. 0 ' , ~
, NO A..c e..c; Fez. ~
$' 50.00 Fir~ CC)de Review / $100 for PUDl'"A
$2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Coll$i~en!=y Review
$500.00 Pre-appliCation fee
(Application~ ,"upiniJt~ <<; months or more after the date of the last pt~pp rne~ting shalt not be
credited towards appli-cation fees and a new pre-application meeting will be requi~.
~925.00 l,egai A9vertismg Fee for cepe melittlllQ
$500.00 legal Ac:IvertisiAg F~ f9r Bee meeting
(advertising Co'StS are to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily News).
2
~
~~
(gI
c.
~
~
o $1500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee
o $1 000.00 ~ted or l'rotec;:ted Species survey review fee {when an EIS is not required}
o Property Owner Notification fees. Property Owner Notifi(:ctians
$ r.50 N()fIo.c:ertifietli $$.00 Certifiecl return receipt mm1
(to be paid after' receipt of invoice from Depl. of Zoning & Development Review)
\ 1\ Attach a Ben, arate Check, forT~sDortati, .on :F~' (Refer to Exhibit A)l (61\ \tLc -\- j, 'In If\ Pods
N .NJ $500~OO Methodolo~y Revtew FEte, if reqUired W / .' \
*Addifional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting I c3t\\{ q Ue~ :-t &'Y\~
Fee Total $
PLANNER MARK IF NEEOED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW:
Conimehts should be forwarded to the Planner rio to the due date
SCHOOL,DJSTRlCT PARKS & REC - Sid Kittila
SUPERVISOR OF elECTIONS City of Naples - Robln Singer
OR/EM1 ~ EMER. MGMT - Jim Von Rintetn IMMOKALEE WATERlSEWER DISTRICT
CDES Coonfmalor - Route sheet Only , tilities Engineering - Zamira Deltoro
c.
.
.
-e
Co~T County
- ~ -----
. I
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 66 of 158
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ,
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLUERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES; FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS LOC 10.03.05 F..
Apphcant must tonduct at least one Neighborhood Inf9rmaflonal Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and
comment on the apphcatfon atld before the Public Hearing Is scheduled with the Pl\:Jnnlng CommiSslon;;
Wtitten m:)fI1:e of the meeting mall be sent to an property owners WItI' are r~q!Jired tt; reeefve legal nofiflc:atlon'
from the County pursuant to Sedio~l O.03.05.8.B.
Notification shall alsO be sent to property owners, condominium and ayic \:JSSo~j:rtIon, whose members are
imp oded by the proposed land use ~nge and who haveformi;dly requested the County to be notified.
A ClOpy of the list of all p(lrti~ nQfli::ed; and the date., time, and location Qf the meeting, JrIust be furniShed to the
Zoning bepartment and ihe Office ~f the Board of CQunfy CommISsioners no less than ten (l0) days prior to the
schedul~~ date ~f the NIM.
The QPprlCalit must make orrangements fot the Ipcctibn c;7f the meeting. The locatioh must be reasonably
convenient to. those prop$rtY oWners who' are required to receive notice and the fadllfles ml1St b~ C)f sufflc1ent
si%e 10 accommodate ~pected a~danae.
The applicant must pla!:2 (:10 adyerti~emei1t of the meeting in thi:lt pornon of 'the newspaper wh~re I~gql n~~
and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, b.cation, time of the meting and leg,lble site location
map t;lf ~ prQP.erty for which the zoning change Is being reque$d. ~ dlsplQY advertlreojent !'hust be one-
fourth page, in type no 5nlaller th~n 12 point and must be pl~ced within a newspaper of general circulation in
the CountY at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NlM.
The Collier County staff planner assigned to the prolee,t must ~nd the NIM and shall serve as the facilitator of
th~ meetin,g; ht;lwever, th& applicant is expected to make a presentaljoh of how it intends to dev~op ihe subject
property.
The app,lIcari.f is required to audio or video tape the proceedin~s of. the meeting and provide a copy to th~
Zoning Department.
As a result of mpndated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shaH be reduced to
writing arid made a part of the record of the proceedings proviqed to the Zoriing Department. These written
commltmel'1ts will be made tI part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodle$ arid made a
part of the consideration for inclusion in file cOhdiUons of approval.
rtecoROING OF DEVElOI'ER COMMITMENTS
Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the oWner or dey~loper (specify name-) at Its expense sholl
recOrd in the Pubnc Records of Collier County a Memorandum of UnderstClndlile of DeVeloper Commhments or
Notice of Developer Comm!1Tnents ~at contains the legCiI description of the property that Is the subJect of the
land I!$e petition and contatos each and every commitment of th.e owoer or developer' specified In
the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shalf cpmply with the
recorcfmg requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A rlKPrded CQPy OT the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided
fQ the Colli~r Couoty Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of re.cordtn~ of said
Memt)fQndurn or Notice.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 67 of 158
COu.rER COUNTY ZONING D~PARTMENT
REQUEST FOR MEETINGS
ce
REASON FOR MEETING (check ohe)
121 Pre-Application Meeting
o Telephone Consultation for SOPj SIP Il'l~bsfa,ntiat Changes
LI Tefephone Consl!ltatlon for ICP Insubstantial Change
o One-On...one Sufficiemcy Review Meeting
'"incflCateS requi{ed field
YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME;* Toda REPRESENTING:* City Gate
PHONE: ~ EMAIt: tocia@davidsonengineering.com
TYPE OF APPUCATlON:'" ,PUD A,mendment
PROPERTY INFORMATION
FOUD NUMl3ER:"" 00292280007
ZONING OR PUD NAME (you muSl; supply original PUD name);. City Gate Commerce Park 88-93
STREET ADDRESS OR LOCATION:* ~r of CR 951 arid City Gate BlVd.
SOP/SIP# (required for InsubS4intlal change): ___
CITY: _ ZlP:_
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED WORK:*
~Iow for detailed description
Additional information
For ~re-Applicatlon Meeting, please brln!:; the following items:
. Stgn~ and V~rlfled Addressing checklist (allow 3 days for processing)
. $500 pre..Ap'plleation Meeting F~
,. $75 Are Review Pre-App Fee
ce
For ADDlicatian Submittal Revlew:
;. S'u~ Checldlst rnU$t be attaq,ed. to the a'pplica~n packC!ge
. All Items tn the patk~ge must be submitted in the ~d; order of the Checklist
. Cover page must be attached to each group of items
We wiR contact you with the scheduled time and person you will be meeting with.
Amendment to the City Gate ORl DO to conform to the City Gate Habitat Conservation Plan and the
City Gate Federal Fish & Wildlife Permit. The amendment i~ to the City Gat~ ORI DO 90-4 [Collier
County Resolution # 90431], Section 4 entitled Vegetation and WitdlifelWetlands, in particular
paragraph c entitled Off-site Mitig,ation and paragraph d entitled Fted C-ockaded Woodpecker
Management Plan. City Gate will also be amending the PUO, .~cffically Section VII, entjtled
Red-Coc~aded Wooopecker Management Plan so that i~ conforms to the City Gate Habitat
Conservation Plan and the City Gate Federal Rsn & Wildlife Petinit. On April 5, 2010, DOli ( e
Pickworth. John Steinhauer and Roger Rice met with Nick Casalanguida, Susan Mason, Kay
Oesefem and Bill Lorenz regarding the amendments.
Dese'emKay
,~~lect:
ratfon:
start:
End:
Agenda Item No. He
November 9, 2010
Page 68 of 158
Pre-a.pp PUDA, Tocia Hamfm, appliCant; Kay Oeselem (ext 2931), planner
Conference Room C
Wed 4128/2010 1:15 PM
Wed 412812010 2:15 PM
Recurrence:
(none)
Accepted
CD$-C
DeseJemKay; DarcoChrtstopl1er; Tocia Hamlin; ashton_h; AuclairClaudine; bearcLt.
BuchheitDavid; CaJlisC$!S;chtzanQwskJ':"'$~GreeneMichael; jarrelLp; longo_fi PauloMartins;
PodczeNvins!<yJohn; Rus~tJ1ony, wlley....r. wmiamsSteVen
RamireZHeather
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Requl~d Attendees:
Optional Attendees:
When: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:15 PM-2:15 PM (GMT-Q5,:OO) E~~rn lime (US & Canada).
Where: Conferen.~ Room C
Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daVlight saving time adjustments"
*_*_~.~*N~~~*N.
PL201Q;.68Z
Please see attachment for pre-app details.
.~ ~
PU01!Hi82.pdf PRI Amendment
Pre.app App stJb...
Under Florida Law. e.mall addreS5el; are plJ.blic recordS, If you do not want your e-maR address released in teSpollse to a public recor!fs request: 00 no( seOd
elec!ronic mal to this entily. Instead. coniic/ Ihls office bV telephOne or in willing. '
--
1
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 69 of 158
NOTES
c.
c.
c.
.-
--.' ... ......
. Q)
c
>.
0
0) 2>
c: Q)
0 :g fh ,-
m ~ 0
0
'- :i .. @
~ '0 "C E
.! " Q)
as Q)
-::J""' GJ - UJ
0 .- m
as "'0
S ~
.'
W ~
..
,.at
'.Q """:
C) E tr)
0;."
= N
Z Z c!4 I
.. CJ) 11) 7
l- N ""
C - .:r
1&1 0 0..
1&1 ~ .c ~
:;: III Z D.
III ~
:c II-
Z a.. "
In w ~
0 Z U) ~
'<
E - w Q) V
Z ..J ';> \/.J
~ c), 0- Q)
- at O!
In -
- E c'
... as Q)
a. z E
D- o.
~ U) 0 g
m Q) .'
.....
6i ~
III c CO
.- 0
a:: U) 1J. if
:::J CD
D- C I
~ rn 0
:s. ....l
r 06 u
CD a
0> ~
C c a;
- "c CD
C .t:
.e 0 II)
~ N .6
.....
rn ffi c
.- .9}
> 0 en
0 0 0.
.<! 0.
<!='
"" e
~
0.
0.
0) lIS
E !
C)..
tU E :?
z
"0 Q) u.:
Q)
-- 0). II)
U 0' Q) Q)
~ 0
0- S >-
fa '0
Z ~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 71 of 158
c.
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
~LES. FLORIDA 341()4
~
APDRES$ING CHECKLIST
I'
Please c:o~pl~ thl' ftiII~g ~d fax, to tt)~ A~dressing Dep~~nt at 239-252-5724 or submit in ~rson to the
Adciressing DePlll'fment ~ f;h~ ai>oye~! Form must. be sianed bvAddressinQ oersonnel Drior to pre-aoolication
meetlna. please allow 5 days for orocessina.
Not all items will apply to every ~ject. Items in bold type ~ req~. rouP NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED.
FQtTqS DIder than & monthswiJfreqtiire adcfltional review am:( approval by the AddreSSing Department
PETITION lYPE (check petition type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist tor each Petition Type)
o BL (Blasting pennit)
o BD(Boat Dock Extension)
o Camlv8IfClrcus PelTT1it
o CU (Condiliorial Use)
o EXP' (Excavation Peimit)
o FP (FInal Plat
o UA (LOt Litle Adjustment)
o PNC' (Project Nam'e Change)
o PPL (PlanS & Plat Review)
o PSP (P~rIjnatY Subdivision PlaQ
o Pl,JD Rezone
o RZ (standai'd ReZone)
o sop ($~e D,~ppment Plan)
o SDPA {SOP Arhendm.mt)
o SOPI Q~pstantial Gh~l)g~ to SOP)
o SIP (~e' hJ1P:r:Dveii\~ PJiID)
o SIPI (I~~antiaf C~nge to .SIp)
o S~f(~ N~roe ~hange) ,
o SNC (Street Nal11~ Chang~ - Unplattet1)
o TOR. (Transfer of Development Rights)
o VA (Va~l)ce)
o VRP (Vegetatiop Removal P~i1)
o VR:SFP (Vegetation Renloval & s~e FiR permit)
DOTHER:
(.
LEGAL DESCRlPnON of subject prop~rty or properties (copy af lengthy desaipfion may be aftaclJed) ~
C-\~'l Gf\"TE"" C:cM\)\I\~ ~~ \>t=\~ \ ,\ Lo--S ,-{ ~ ~~ \.~
~\ \ Ps ~ ~,--a.. CU-c,\ot G~\::"e:-(y.~('\~~?-M~C?~ \..0\5 \-2..0 ~~
FOUO (PrQ~~ (P) NUMBER.(S) of abOve (attach to--;or-assoeiateViil1i, legal , pfian if more than ane)~~ \\ 'eJ
SE6" P\\ \"C1\~ p.;~t>~, t\'~
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assj~ed) ~\\~C-E::L \
'" LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exad. location of project/site in relation to nearest pubfic road right-of-way
. SURVEY (copy .. needed only for unplatted properties)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if appJir:able)
PROPOSED STR~ NAMES (if applicable)
c.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PlAN NUMBER (for existing projer;ts/sites only)
SOp orAR#
'.
t>DDRES$lNG CHECKLIST - PAGE "tWO
." ;!A'~".:~
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 72 of 158
. ..... .", .-..._.......-,.... .....--.......-...-...........
Project, or dev~lopment names propos$:l for, or already appearing in, condominium dOQJmlmt$ ('If applicS.tiQI'l;indlcatB
whether proposed or existing) .
Please Check One~ 0 ctted\f'lst is to be Faxed baCk
if'Petsonally Piclred Up
APPUCANTNAME, TD'5t+ t~~ ~ DJi-vl~Sc-7\J ErJb
PHONE 13'(. 'o~,l> FAX tf3~. b08't(
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is
..ct to ~er reView by the Addr~Sing Department
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
FlN Number (Primary) ~,E.. \:::... v::\\\ ~c.. ~ ~
.
Folio NumJler
Folio Number
F9lio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio N~r
Date: 4-,--a...~ - '0
Date: 0/ /Zb/ I cJ
Updated
-e
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Fna:Davidwl a_..~
OtJ,aa,e PoiDh
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 73 of 158
Z!I ac I1OS4
OU1sr.sna 18:&8 -== P ,
___ . 00Ute2
ce
~~^-._d!JoQ!ala --... "'-'-
. .. ,.' . ~~LIltI1-tfil
== ~qcA$l)ol:>$.'lf'
~ "Z4oqSO~OOq.q.
=6'1 "2,...c,.f)q.$.O(;)~O z.9
. " .183 '
~ ~(poq~ooOOUllO
~
~
~
~
~
2.Q5iJOO ...
~
~
~
. . _ _ It
2G5OQOY7
. ..,-(' A'" ,
.-zJ,r
"\i e - z...
ce
~,a.dit~~.dI!Ii:.r . ~-~
~.~PlRtBOokID4 "'-.Ilb ,e.....tt_
, A ~Tf' ~Ihww maobeI:IIRilotClOlldagap;
OllBoat49 Pap 97-100
t"!tftr1:!.6oo n._..L~ CeIder PMIe ' '
TJ.ne..M29B1~
uoqS ',oot.\-4~
2.t.~~OOO ~~ca
"L~oOiSC)oa l.\;~tt
7..-~.O "5000 SQ,
~o~Sooo ~caa
~oG\5000~
1...~o~~ooo ~5
-z,...Cpoq$ooo5li.\
Z-U>O~GD(:JO: lpOtt
~Oa.$OOD (p'Z-O
t.,ft>oqSOO{;l; CPCkCP
-z.-CAo'\?OOO l?C#~
2-~ o~ ~ 000 coca CO
. -z...u ()~S-060 ., 0 (
~(#~q ,"000 1"t.1
-u:"o~$OOO 143-
'Z..CDOGt,'S.ooO 1~C1
-zlAOqsooo 1~!>
-uPdiS'"()ljl) ~o lS
U ~Soob'i"Z..Cf
7,.f.troC\S;ootJ ~4C
'Z..<DcA~oodi~
"7..tPoqSoOO~ .
ce
.
.
-e
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 74 of 158
PUDA NARRATIVE
On December 13, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners adopted (1) Ordinance
No. 88-93, the City Gate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development (the "PUD~') and (2)
Development Order 88-02 (the "1988 Development Order"), which approved a Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) known as Citygate Commerce Park Development Order. The Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA), appealed the 1988 Development Order, and the appeal
was settled by a Settlement Agreement between Collier County and DCA resulted in
Development Order 90-4, approved as Resolution No. 90-431 dated August 28, 1990 (1990
DOA).HThe 1990 DOA amended the 1988 Development Order by amending Section One:
Conclusions of Law, Section 4, Vegetation and WildlifeIWetlands, including paragraphs c and
d (which were entitled "Off-Site Mitigation" and "Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management
Plan", respectively) of the 1988 Development Order. As a result, the provisions of the 1990 '
DOA are the currently effective provisions relating to Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management
and mitigation. 850 NWN, l..LC, a Florida limited liability company, and CO II, ILC, a Florida
limited liability company, (collectively "Petitioner") own the POO property east of the FPL
Easement, and in planning the development of this property, entered into a formal consultation with
the United States Fish and WIldlife Service (USFWS). As a result, the Petitioners developed the
City Gate Habitat Conservation Plan (City Gate HCP), which incorporates the latest Red Coclcaded
Woodpecker (Rew) management methods, and which was approved by the USFWS on March 30,
2009. On July 1, 2009, USFWS issued a Federal Fish &WildIife Permit (City Gate Federal Permit)
which incorporates the most current RCW mitigation strategies.
The RCW Management Plan in the 1988 PUD varies from the RCW
management plan and mitigation strategy required by the City Gate HCP and Federal
Permit, and therefore, Petitioner has petitioned the Board to amend the POO by deleting
Section VII of the POO, and at the same time has petitioned for an amendment to the 1990
DOA to conform the RCW Management Plan and mitigation strategy of the Development
Order to the RCW management and mitigation requirements of the City Gate HCP and
Federal Permit respectively.
Upon the approval of Petition Number [# of DOA Petition] and the adoption of a
resolution amending the 1990 DOA (the 2010 DOA), the operative RCW management and
mitigation requirements for the City Gate DRI/PUD will be the requirements of the 2010
DOA For clarity and administrative efficiency, and in accordance with County policy, the
RCW management and mitigation requirements for the City Gate DRIlPUD should be the
requirements of the City Gate HCP and Federal Permit respectively, which will be
incorporated into the 2010 DOA Any actual or potential conflicts between the DRl and
POO with respect to RCW management and mitigation requirements should be eliminated
by deleting all provisions regarding RCW management and mitigation from the POO, so
that the requirements shall be only as set forth in the 2010 DOA
PUDA.PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGA TE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE: 5/7/10
DUE: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 75 of 158
Narrative Concernin2 Federal Permits
The Petitioner (hereinafter "City Gate") obtained an Federal Fish & Wildlife Permit TE145823-0 (City ( .
Gate Federal Permit) on July 1, 2009 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to
Section 10 of the United States Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq)
(Act). The City Gate Federal PenDit was in conjunction with a Habitat Conservation Plan (RCP), which
was also approved by the USFWS and was pursuant to Section 10 of the Act. The City Gate RCP,
document #2005050-10.1 dated March 15,2006 as revised through May 2008, was Spproved on March
30, 2009. City Gate's HCP is the first to involve Florida panther habitat (Pumas conc%r coryi) and the
first in Southwest Florida to address on-site Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) (RCW).
The Federal Permit authorizes clearing of the site for construction of a mixed-use, non-residential,
commercial / industrial office park: complex.
Because the City Gate HCP was both unique and precedent setting, the HCP underwent a lengthy,
extensive examination and review by the USFWS. The USFWS review was both locally (Vero Beach)
and regional (Atlanta). The USFWS also coordinated with and received comments from the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), whose comments and concerns were addressed in
the HCP. On a County level, City Gate's Enviromnental Impact Statement (EIS) was reviewed and
received unanimous approval by the Collier County Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC).
The HCP includes current mitigation techniques and strategies such as the use of artificial cavities,
habitat restoration of State lands in the Picayune Strand State Forest (picayune) and the translocation of
RCWs, which will provide essential support for the RCWs in the North Belle Meade and the Picayune.
City Gate, working with the USFWS, FWC, and Florida Division of Forestry, has already moved 21
RCWs to artificial recruitment clusters in Picayune. Three breeding pairs are now established, with at
least one member from these moves. The quantity ofland purchased for the HCP is less than what was
called for in the 1990 RCW Plan for the entire project, however, the HCP's 102 acres of pine flatwoods
are far superior RCW habitat than the 1990 minimal requirement for mitigation property. The HCP-
purchased lands include nesting habitat in old growth pine. The lands include an occupied RCW cluster
in the North Belle Meade (16 acres), one site for a recruitment cluster (46 acres) and part of a
recruitment cluster on the Picayune (40 acres).
The HCP is not fixated on one RCW group, but rather the HCP is focused on the survival and recovery
ofRCW groups in the North Belle Meade and Picayune. City Gate's mitigation for RCWs includes the
restoration of old growth pine forest habitat in the northern Picayune Strand State Forest. With the aid
of artificial cavities and translocation (moving birds - pairing birds) to the northern Picayune, City
Gate's mitigation will provide essential support for the existing North Belle Meade RCW population as
well as the existing RCW population in the southern part of the Picayune. Ralph Costa, fonner RCW
USFWS Coordinator stated that City Gate "is providing a substantial amount of conservation benefit for
RCWs in light of the potential impact. Both FWS and FFWCC should be appreciative of this - there
will be significant gains for RCW recovery from the planned M & M [Minimization and Mitigation]."
The City Gate HCP also proposes mitigation measures for the Florida panther. This mitigation includes
the construction of a wildlife crossing with fencing in a strategic section of CR 846 east of Immokalee,
Florida, where seven (7) Florida panthers have been struck and killed by motor vehicles during the past
twelve (12) years. City Gate was also the largest financial contributor to. a study by the University of
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CllYGA TE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE: 517110
DUE: 617110
c.
c.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 76 of 158
Central Florida (Dr. Reed Noss) to evaluate and identify other priority roadways within Collier County,
where installation of wildlife crossings may be indicated. Construction of the wildlife crossing is
'.tended to begin in November of 201 0 and is expected to be completed by May 2011.
Copies of the City Gate Rep and Incidental Take Pennit are available upon request.
.
-e
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 77 of 158
c.
c.
c.
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
_mber 9,2010
ge 78 of 158
~
~ --~..
~~. '?;. ?
('- . ~ ~
~~..~ .. \:A
'\j.l1-.... .~~ ~~
,". -'ll
," a.., "7- It.
'". 1.1.
("..1'. 'S'
~~~.
iH
....
..
ORDINAtiCI 8~-..2.L
:
1Jf ORDINANCE AMENDING OJtDIHANCI 82-2
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS
FOR TUE UNINCORPORATEn A1\.tA OF COLLIER
COUNTY'. FLORIDA BY AMENDING 'l'HB IONING
^TLAS ."P NUMBER 49-26-7 BY CHANGING THE
ZONUlG CLASSIFICATION OP THB HEREIN
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A-2
AGRICULTURE TO .pun- PLAMNED UNIT
DtvELOPKEHT r:NOWN AS IIcn'! GATE COMMERCE
PARK. FOR HIXED USES HON-RESIDENTIAL,
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIALI OFFlCE/Jt%IJ.TED
SERVICES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST QUADRANT or 1-75 AND C.R. 951,
287.187 . ACRES, IN SECTION 35, !CWHSHIP
U sou'rHT lWfGB 2&EAS'l'r MD PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
,.,
,.
.:oJ ~
>
. ,
"
Uj ~ ~;; c:.
l:.J U J:<:
:.u w ".....1.1.;
a: Q ,~~:;j
m -'uS
KREREAS, WUlie. R. Vin.. of Vb.. &nd Associatea, Inc.,
repr...nt!n, Citizen. and Southern Tru.t Co=pany (Florida'
N..Uonal A&&ociaUon, Raplea, Ploridt. as Trultee under Lan4
~.t 15360, petltlonod the Board of County C~i..ioner. to
change ~ba Icnlni Classification of the herein described real
propertrr
HOW, THE1UtFORJ! BE IT ORDA1NED by the Board of County
C~a.loner. of Collier County, Florida,
SEC'rIOH ON! I
The zon1n, clasaification of the hereinafter de.cribed
raal property i8 ch4nged fro. 1.-2 Aqriculture to .PUD-
Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD doeu.ent
attached hereto .. E~h1bit -A- which i. incorporated herein
and by reference ~de part hereof. The Official Zoning At1..
Hap Humber 4'-26-7, a. descr!bed in Ordinance 82-2, i. hereby
...ndad accordinvly.
SECTION nlOI
Thi. Ordinance ehall become effective apon receipt of
ftotice fr~ the Secretary of State th~t this Ordinance has
been filed with the Secretary of State.
DA'1"B~ n..ce=ber 1). 1988 80ARD 0,. COUHTr COHKISSIONEJUI
~':. ~~.Jr:-.'J ,~i'... COL~I . ~~' ~RIDA
:J.'rTESTI .., ,'\ BY' ~~
· dAMES C. GILES I CLERK R'1' L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAH
:.t~.r- .;~- ~.~.
..". ... r7 r~"
,. " .:
AP,p~ ,!t!f:~ FO,JtM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
~~_ 1n. .1r,~'/L.Jr
RAiJOiJ'i'BM. STU5lii'1' 03
ASSIS'1'AN'l' COtIHTY A't'l'OJUm~O<< 3p!r.[ ~B2
'Tbrs ~ fired ...... ttt.
~!=~-
~I~thot
.~~..
of ~~fC~
t..~..
-
..
12-5-11
CITYCATE COMMERCE PARK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT
Prepared by
VlnH C Auod.tn. Inc.
ns Tenth Street South
Napl... FlorI.33MO
Phone: (113) 251-.1M
Agenda Item No. 17C
~ber9,2010
~ge 79 of 158
'.
Dal. Flied: l-1I-17
Date "pproved by CCPC:
Oat. Approved by BCC: 12/1"80
Ol"l"naMe Number: 8R.I)'
too( 033 nr-t ~B3
Age~m No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 80 of 158
" c.... ":". ,....;:7
-
J..!mil
SECTION .
lAB
I. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DE$CRIPTION 1. .
II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 1 . "
111. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT RECULATIONS 15 . 23
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS 2_-21
V. TRAFFIC AND ENCINEERINC REQUIREMENTS 21-8
VI. UTIUTIES REQUIREMENTS . 30-"
VII. REO COCKAOED WOODPECKER MANACBdENT PLAN "."
ATTACHMENTS:
MASTER PLAN
TABLE U.B.1.
'* 033nr.t....S4
..
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010 .
Page 81 of 158 ,ii
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.'. PURPOSE
The pur:pose of thl. Section la to ad forth th. location and
own....hlp or IN property. and to describe the ulsllng
concUtlona of the property to be dwelop;ed under the project n8IM
of: CITYCATE COMMERCE PARK.
1.2. LECAL DESCRIPTION
iM subJ-c:t property I. 217.117 ecras In aru. The legal
description follows thI. pege.
, t.!. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
TlU. to the property I. curnnUy In L..nd Trust' 5360. held by
CItizen. , Southern Trust Company (florida) National Association.
Napla. florida. P.O. Box 1&57. Napl... Florida 33"9-1157. The
land trust conatltutes a unlned own.r-shlp v.hld.. Decisions
ngardlnv trUlt management .... made by a .Ing" trustee In accord
with man8Cjlemant guldennes approved by . majority of the trud
bend'ld..-Iu.
'.
'* 033wol ""85
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 201
Page 82 of 15
. f'\
,,v
~~fi
c
;;.. .~:
~'.,
JloLI, MONTE' AHD AIIOC.. IHC.
<~. ~T1HG ENGIHURS... LAHO SURVEYORS
IfJA FI r. No. 1S.23
t/30/16
Shut t o( 1
LEC,(L DESCRIPTION
ThaNorthhal f of Sectlon 3S. TownshlpU South. Ringe 21 east,
COllier County, Florid. LESS the W..t tOD.OD reet thereof for
rlght-of_IY purposes and LESS the followIng descrIbed pare. Is:
A parcel o( land beIng. portion of the Northwe.t Quart.r 0'
Sectlon3S. Township _, South, Rang. 21 East. COIII.r County,
FlorId.. Selng more particularly d.scrlbed-a. tollows:
Coftmenclng at the quarter Section corn'r.., conmon to Section. U
and 35. Township _, South, Rang. 25 Ea.t. COllier County.
Florida. Said quarter corner belng marked wIth. ,- ~ ,-
concrete monument having I 3-lnch bra&. cap .ttached to thl top
thereor, with. 3/'-lnch Iron pIpe: th.nee along the Secllon Ilnl
between saId Section. 3_'and 35, North OGoZ,'tS- We.t, 1.312._3
. feet to a point on the center'lne of th. proposed Acces. Road No.
1 a. ahown on tha Statl of Florida O.p.rt~nt of Transport.tlon
RIght-of-Way Map for St.te Road No. '3 (1-75) Sheet. of 10:
thine. .Ion, ..Id cent.rlln. of the propo.ed Acc... Road No. t
North "031 01- Ea.t. '00.00 f..t to . poInt on the Ea,t
rIght-of-way Iln. of . canal. ..Id point .1.0 being on the
eent.rlln. of the proposed Icces. road to tha w.t.r tr.atment
plant parc.l; thence .long .ald Ea.t ean.1 rlght-or-way line
North 0002,'tS. W..t. 50.00 r..t to a ,- x ,- concrete monument
mcrklng th. Northwest corner of thl propo.ed .CCIS. rOld
rlghl-of-w.y to the water treatment plant parcel: and being thl
truI POINT OF BECiINNINC of the parc.1 to b. herein de.crlbed:
th.nel .10"9 the North Iln. of .ald aec... road rlght-or-way
North ,,031'01' Ea.t. 451.5t f..t to . ..~ ,. concr.te monument
~rklng the Int~r.ectlon of .ald North right-of-way with the W.st
boundary Iln. of the water treatment 9lant p.rc.': thence .Iong
.ald We.t bound.ry Iln. North 00.'7'1'- East. "..,. f..t to an
Iron rod on the We.terly right-of-way of a strip of land 170 flel
In width for I FlorIda. Po.er , Light Company (FPIL) right-of-way
II d.scrlbed In Offlcl.1 Record. Book "1. P.g. 12\0, CoIII.r
County Record.: thence .10ng ..Id Wlst.rly FPIL rlght-of-w.y
NOrth 31030'2S- Ea.t, 70.02 f'lt to an (ron rod; thance_
continuing "ong .ald Westerly FPIL right-of-way South 5.030'03-
Ealt. 76'.5' f..t to a .. x _- concr.t. monument; thenc.
continuing .Iong laid We.tarly FP,L rIght-of-way South GDo'7'1'.
W..t. 1,0".70 r.et to a ,- k _. concr.te monument: thance
contInuIng along Slid We.t.rly FPlL right-of-way South GO.'7'1.-
Welt, 332.7' t.et to an Iron rod m.rklng the IntersectIon of 1.ld
We.terly FPIL right-at-way wIth the South line of the North half
of the South hllf of the Northwest qUlrter of S.ctlon 35.
Township _. South, Rang. 2' e.st. eolller County, Florida: Slid
poInt also being the South.ast corner of the parcII being her.ln
descrlbtd: thence along ..Id South line of the North hal' of the
South halt ot the Northwest quarter 0' Section 35, South
II.Oe'eD- West. '90.12 f.et to I c. ~ ~- concrete monument: &~Id
2
ute 033U'ol"'88
, < '
Agenda Item No. 17C
~mber 9, 201
~age 83 of 15
-
-
~ Fll. Ho. '5.2'
'lUlU
She't 2 or 2
point being the Southwest earner or the pareel baing herein
d.scrlbld: thene. along the ~elt boundary Iln. of laid p.rcel
North la-'7"'. Elll. 653.'0 r..t to . ,. X ,. conerata monument
..rklng thl Inter.ectlon of thl W..t boundary of the ..ter
trlatment plant parcI' with the South rlght-orwway of the
proposed acc... road to the wat.r tr.atment plant parc.l: thlnce
along saId South rlght-of-..y South .'-31'01. W..t. '5'.21 f..t
to a .. ~ " coneret. monument ~rklng the Inter'lctlon or ..Id
ace.s. rOld South rlght-of-~y with the east rlght-or-..y of .
canll; "thence .Iong said canal Eut rlght-or-w.y North 00021'15-
West 100.00 f..t to the POINT OF BECINNIN:i..
NO
A portion of the North hllf of Slctlon 3S. Townlhlp " South,
Range Z' Ea.t: baing d..crlbed ,.. follow.:
. 8egln on thl South Iln. of the North half of ..Id Section 35. .t
. point North ....0.01. Ea.t 100.00 (I,t rrom the Southwelt
corner of the North half of .ald Section 35, th.nee run North
00.2"15- Welt. 1.33'.11 (eet. thene. South 0'-21'0'- Ea.t.
2'5.12 f.at, thence South Dzo,I'25- Ea.t, 750.ID r.at to the
begInning of . curve concave to the North...terly having a rldlus
of 334.00 feet, thence run Southerly .'on, ..Id curve 2'0.5'
f.et. throu;h a centr.1 Ingle of '1.01'21 to the .nd of .ald
curve. thene. South '3-'715'- E..t. ".1' f.et to the South line
of the North hal( of ..Id Section 35. thence South .'-00101-
W..t. 201.27 feet to the POINT OF BECINNrNO.
~
A portion of the North hair of Section 35. Townlhlp ., South.
Range 25 EAst: being de.crlbed .. folrows:
Begin on the South Ilna of the North h.I' of .ald Slctlon 35, .t
. poInt North ',.00'01- Ea.t. 301.27 f..t {rom the Southwl.t
corner or the North haIr or .ald SectIon 3S. thene. run North
43."'S.- W..t. ".1' feat to the beg1nnlng of . curve concave to'.
the Horth...terly having a radlu. of 331.00 feet. thence run
Northw..t.rly .10ng ..ld curve 2'0.51 fe.t through. cantral
ani'e of ".01'Z'- to the .nd of .ald curvI. thencl North
.2 "'25. We.t, 750.10 f.et. thence North 0'.21'0'- WI.t, 2'1.'2
fut. thence North 00.2,115- Wut. 15'.00 feet. Ut.nee Horth
".'1'0'- Ea.t, ".'2 f.et. thlnce South 0'-21'D'- E..t. 371."
f..t. thence South 02-.,'25- Ea.t.' 7S1.5. '.et. to the beginning
of . curve concave to thl North...terly having a radlu. of 2".00
re.t. thence run South...terly ,'ong ..Id curvI ltO." r..t,
through I central angl. of ".01'Z9- to the end or Slid curve,
thence South .3-'7'SC- East. 151.1' f.et to the South line o( the
North ha" or said Section 35. thence South a'.OD'01- We.t. '5.'0
(ut to the POINT OF BEGINNI~.
COntaining 217.1&7 acres. more or lee..
1
HOLE. MONTES 6: ASSOe:'ATEr. 'Ne:.
.
&Ok O33w.\ "'87
~~.
..',:
.~.
, "',,"
\'
-.,"
. ~~~ t_. eENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA
-
AgiIiWiia.Jtem No. 17C
~mber9. 2010
Page 84 of 158,
.
A. The 217. 117 acre tnct n.. In the northaul qUldnnt of the
1-751 CIl 95' lnt~. The prOperly I. bOUnded on the
watt by CR IS' and on the north by the Colden Cat.a c.n.I.
B. The property II zOM<! A-2 Agrlculturat. pn,posed \0 be
. , '
rezoned to PUO- Planned Unit Development. The property tin
In u,. Com... County Wat... Sewer Olstrlct.
t.s. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The property elevatlon "119" from about to.! fni to 12.2 f..t
IIboYI InUn sea level. avef"Il9lng about 11 ,..t. Wetland. on the
properly M"8 limited to about 21.5 1lCr"eS. mctCt of which has been
previously subJec:ted. to extended p.rlocl. 0( over drain-.r.
...d exotJc vegetation invasion. Most or the property I. vegetated
trfth pin. and usoc:Jated upl.nd planta.
Sotl types on the p~perty Include Arzell. Kerl. and Pomp8nO FIne
Sand.
W'~ ~t for the Cltygeu Commerce Park project I, to be
the lake and oatu,..1 .urfltCe detenUcm type. SurfllCe water
dtscharv. wilt 1M to the north Into tM Colden Celli CcNI t.hroU2h
. sIngle control structure.
,
-
Ag~em No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 85 of 158
~ ' "
.~. ,
't. t
. .
i1.. .'
i' .
,~.. i.I. STATEMENT OF COMPliANce
~J> '
'~~'1'
, "Yo
JO"-t-, ~;
OeYeIopment CJf Cltygate ~ Park .s . Planned Unit
Oe\"elopment will comply wIth the planning goals and obJKtlvu Df
Colli... County as set forth In the Compr.henslve Plan. The
CoC'Ilprehenslve Plan Polley which moat sp.ctncaUy relales to the
Cltygeta proJed. Is Polley !lOll CJf ObJKlIv. 3:
9BJECTlVE ]
An appropriata mix or land us.. to provide tor the prennt
and future needs of Comer County.
D. Culde ec:onomlc development to eftClOU"9. a diversification 0(
the county's economic bas. and to IDMt the employment nMd.
0( pnsent and future ....Id.nu.
Compliance wIth the Comprehenslva Plan ....ts on th.
following fllCtors:
1. The Cltygau property meets the Comp..wnalv. Plan
rating point ~Um with respect to the ewllabUlty of
public services and rac:IIlUu. '
2. The plltnned l&l1d use mIx conforms to the Future Land
Us. Ucp.
s
Agenttr1tem No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 86 of 158
3. All project Improvements w&1l comply with appllcabl.
re;ul.\1ons .
_. l'hep...oJect wlUconlth.ute . maJor- work cent... wIth In
excallent working environment.
5. The project will be IIt"Ved by . complete rang. of
services and 'lcUllln.
I
1.01( 033 fI'.{ -00 .
.
.
-
Age~em No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 87 of 158
SECTION II
.
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
'.'1' t.t. PURPOSE
.'
;':0(.' .
...-:
The purpose of this Sec:Uon Is to de*Crlbe the basIc. devtloprMnt
obJec:tJves and to 9fl*'IIy describe the proJect dw.lopment
plan .
t.!. ~ENERAL
._-_.._~.... .
A. Cltygat.t Commerce Park I. planned .. . mlxMt UH. non-
....ldentl.l. commerdal/ lndu..trlall orncaJ relatad nrvlc:e&
project. TM uses on ICIIM. If not an. of t.he sites nurat
CR '51 west of the F.P. , L. ......nt will provIde a variety
of c:ommerdal urvlces to hIghway traveler.. wIth a ..peelel
.-nphnls on the provt&1on of s.rvIce to Interstate
travelers. The remainder 01 the sItes. both east 8nd west of
the F.P. S L. .......nt. will be utilized by commerdaI and
Industrial nrms associated with t.echnohgtcal research.
product development. light manufacturing. stonli* and
distribution. ofOen .nd e .Ide variety of utilitarIan and
c:ommerd.1 support busln...... It I, antlclpated \hat some
of the CltYVllte land UHC .111 be linked wIth educatJonaI
7
MIC 033 'l~ ~91
.......--..--..-
Age~m No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 88 of 158
InsUtuUon.. Clty;ate C<<Immtrce Park wnl provIde .It..
whIch KCOmmOdate . varl.ty 0' .ntrepr.neurlal ICtlvltles In
. physical ..ttlJl9 which II spadouc. attnld.lve. and rree
of the nulunca typtl charactarl.Ucs whIch .... typical of
Industrial distrIcts of th. put. A prImary development
objectIve of Cltygate 11 that thtIStructurH. the -.nenltl...
end the nalural and Insblled landscape be attractive and
conctJtute . pleaunt. satisfying ...p~t environment.
Development of thIs proJ.ct .hall be governed by the
contents of this documu1t and applJcable nctJona of the
com.. County Zoning OrdInance.
Unleu otherwise not.d, the ddlnlUona of an terma .hall
be the ... a& the deIInlt.lona set forth In the Corner
County Zoning Ordlnanca.
c
ute 033".., "'92
.. ... '"4 ....
of
A~ltem No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 89 of 158,
~
"
Project development shall conform to the appr"DWd ......
OcYelopMnt Plan In sen"'" .nd to the approved Subdivision
Construction PI.,..
..
...~ i
" :\: ;2.'. pROJECT PLAN
..
"
Jo... ;
~L:
A.
.
The .....ler Dayelopment Plan for the project Is Indicated on
....p IH) of the Application for Deyelopment Approval and Is
an Integral part of thl. PUD document. A r-educed version of
the Mast... Development Plan I. .ttac:h~ at the rear of thla
document. Element. of the MasUr" Development Plan Include:
Land U..
StnetI
Lake
Common Lends
F.P. 1 L. e...m.nt
Building situ (Includes wetland
pruerva which ....t be kept as
on-st~ natural .,....1
Total
As:a
21
35
10
12
m.
217
B. In.dd1tJon to the plan .Ilments shcrwn on the Mut.,.
. .
Development Plan_ such ..cements and rlvhts-of....."
shall be .stabll.hed as lftlIy be ne<:eCArY or desIrable for
the HrYlce_ function or conY.nlen~ of the pl"OJecl.
s
lot<< 033 fl,C.1 "'93
'.
.!
. . .
-
..
Aglltem No. 17C
ber9,2010
age 90 of 158
c. The Muter Development Plln I. ,110 thI Subd1v1doft
....ater Pla"-.
2.'. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
DevelopMent Intenalty pet'IIIllted ~lthln'Cltygat. Commerce P.,.k
shall be limited to the .mount of bulldlng development. number of
employ.... and number of pa..klng lpac:a set ror1.h In Tabl.
12.B.!.. reproduced r.-om the Cltyga... Cocnmen:e Park ".D.A..and
.tbIc:hed at the r.... of thll doc:ument. The 8mOunt of bundlng
development devoted to the various land una which .11I occupy
tM project may vary f,.. the esttmatet I"cae porattd In the
A.D.A.. but the ~.te WDOUnt of building developnent
Indlcat.d by A.D.A. T8bI. 12.8.3. may not be uended.
'.
2.5. PLAN APPROVAL REOUlftEMENTS
A. PURPOSE
.
.
The Master Dev.lopment PI." Indl~t.. the bcslc nlltu,.. of
devalopment permitted for the project as a whole. consisting
of 1 road network. a centnlly loc:ated lake. . cyttem of
pedestrIan WIfYS. . lake front 8IMnlty alt. lInd corridors of
development sites along which tndlvldua1 development pU"CClc
kill ~ estabUshed. Inst&lIs11on of required WMU..
10
MIl 033'1~ "9,4
-
-
Ag_m No. 17C
ber 9,2010
Page 91 of 158
utlllUes. etc. may occur tither In the entl...ty. Of" In a
....1... of Increments. The purpose of U. plan approY81
.
requlrements I. to provide .. mtchanl.. for tha county stiff
to revl.. d.ullMl dcveloplMnt plans and to determine If
those plana camply fully with commitments estabnshed by the
PUD c:Socument. ORa OeYl:lopment Order. ,County ZonIng
R~latlons and aU other appl1cable st&Marda and
regulations. Counly alan approval of detaUed development
plan. must be oblaJned prior to th~ constructlon of proJItCt
Infrastructu....
B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL REOUIRED
PrIor to luuanc. of building permits for . structure or
structures on any development alte. Site Devalopment. Plan
approval must be obtained In 8CCOr'd with Section 10.5 of the
County Zoning Ordinance. The Slta Development Ph", mud be
In substantial compliance with the project Muter
Development Plan. .. that plan ".., be IftOdtned by CoIn...
County from time to time. In IIddltlon to the listed
conc:ems of Stc:t.lon 10.5. the SIte Deyelopment Plan rtYl..
and approval proc:us ah&1I Include' conslderaUon . of
architectural desIgn quality and bultdlng materials
suItability a. those m.Uerll ...Iat. to the development
quanty commltmenla ut forth In SedJon 2.2.A. of thll
cb:ument.
'.
11
'* 033 tu;t '''95
.:,~ ."'~
-
A9iiilirltem No. 17C
~mber9,2010
Page 92 of 158
c. RECORD PLAT APPROVAL REOUIREMENTS
Prior to recording the record plft. nnat plan. 01 the
required fmprovement.l shall be approved by the
Plannln;IZonlng Dlnctor and approprllte other Cotll...
CGUnly Departmenu and Ofndal. to Insur. =mpllance wl~
the pl"OJect Muter Development Plan. th. Com.,. COunty
Comprehensive Plan. the CtlIU... County Subdivision
R.gulatlonl. and platting J.... 0I1he Stat. of Flor-I".
2.1. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION RECULATIONS
The following requIrements shall be .alved or modIned:
'.
A. Artlde X. SectJon 1': SIdewalks ,-hall be requIred .. d10wn
on the .pproved Master Development Pt.", on at ....t OM
side of the .,dstJng ec:ceu road when It I. reconstructed ..
required by 5.2.8.. and on at leut on. ltd. of all Internal
project. stra"".
'.
B. Ar1.Ide X. SectIon 11: StrHt n8IM Ilgns shall be 'approved
by the County engIneer but need not meet. the
U.5.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Menual of Uniform Tr-afTtc Ccrntrol
DevIces. Street pavement p&lntlni. drlplnp. and ref1tctJve
edging requirements shall be ntved.
t2
.. 003nr.t ~OO
',0.
,io
",~...
.!
Agenaa ffem No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 93 of 158
C. Artlclt XI. Section 10: Th. ,..qull"tmant to Install JIIOnuments
In a typical wat... valve cov... shall be waived If aU
.
monuments .,.t Inltaned In accord with state standard. and
In . JIIIInner approved by the County Engln.....
O. Article XI. Sectlon 21: The requirement fOf' blank utility
culngl shatl be waived 11 .U requIred uttltU.. ....
InataUed prior to conltructlon or the street bal. and
~t.
2.1. STREETS TO BE PRIVATE
AU platttd Itreet.I withIn the pl"OJect sMII be the c:oawnon
pi operty of the proJect landownan.
%.1. 'MPACT FEES
The Cltygate Coamerce Parie proJect shan be subject to aU lmpac:t
f.. appUc:8ble to It at the t1lM of project approval. In the
event future Impact f... .... adopted to ...Ist with various
public servIce fK1I1ty nnanclng, IUch f... shall be appllcabl.
to the Cltyg.te Commttrca P.rk PI"OJect In lICCONI with the lenM of
the ordlnancn which Impose the (MI..
'.
11
hi( 033 tt.'.{ "'97
Agen"'ffii1rem No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 94 of 158 ~
~~
'.;
't'
.~
l1
, '
RHponslbltlty for compliance with the terms of this PUD
.
dclc1nMnt. the DRI oev.lopment Order and all other IppUcable
pub1tc ra<jlulatory requirements shaUlnltJaUy be that of the
pl"OJect developer or hI. successor( s) In tllle. PrIor t.o the
developer or hi. succeuor( I) In title being ral1tved or thl.
ruponslblllty. a pl"OJect rMna;emant entity shall be establl.hed
and given rHponllbtllty for continuing maintenance of the
project lnfrutructure. lake. w&ta.. man.;ement fKlltU~. common
.'
FIRE STATION SITE
C1tYSlate Commerce Park repres.nlatly.. shan conf... with
approprlats Colden Gate FIre Control .nd Rescue DIstrict
reprasentatlvH ragardlng the need for an additional fl,.. station
alte In th. vicinity of the l.75/CR 951 Interchange. In the
event 'that the Cold.n Gate FIr. Control and Re~u. Dlrtrlct
determln... that I n,.. stallon sIte I. approprIate on the
CltYSllta property. the Cltygatt Commerce Park dly,loper or
auccuaorl sl In title &hall make the MI.~ fire staUon aIle
avellable. and shalt contrlbuttl to Its colt on . fair shar,
buls.
DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE
open .~. streets. etc.
n
JDIl 033 N".\ "'98,
....
SECTION III
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT RECULA il0NS
The purpose of this Sactlon I. to .et forth the development.
regU1&tJonl appllcablt to \he Cltygate CocMw'ce Park proJect.
USES PERMITTED
No bulldtng or structure. or part thtareof. shall be erecte<!.
altered or used. or land used. In whole Of' part. for other than
the following:
A. PrIncipal Usaz
WEST OF THE FLORIDA POWER , UCHT EASEMENT:
,. Ont gasoline nrvJce statJon or fuel ctl.pen5lng
fac:Jnty
2. Hotala or motels Indudlng Jn~ra1 cadc\&11 IClungu
3. It.ta1l salu ,nd person&! ",.. bu&1nasPI which are
15
"" 033 flf.\ SJOO
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 95 of 158Jt
i iJ.t
l1'{
~\
"
"
-
-" ";I'~' : ~ \'.'
-
Ag*m No. 17C
ber9,2010
Page 96 of 158
travel.,.. and/or the Cltygale Commerce Park IUrkat.
RetaU sal.. facUlUea shall not Include shopping
.
center. type.. uHI wf\IChwould'gitne...le .iubltitnU... \rid..
from the ....ld.ntlal ntlghborhaodl In the vicInity.
EAST OF THE FLORIDA POWER' LICHT EASEMENT:
1. LIght manufacturing and/or processing
2. Research. tutlng. product development
3. Service and repal,. buslnus..
,. Showrooms and sal... cenl.,.. In association wIth
permItted us..
"
5. Storage and dJ&trlbuUon usa
t. Pubnlhlng. reproduction. communIcations
7. Rull ...1.. and penon.' urvJce buslftft&H which are
designed and operated to primarily serve the CItYVfte
Commerce Park market
II
u_ 033' md. 00
,
.
,
~ ..
';0
Ag~em No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 97 of 158 ,;
BOTH EAST AND WEST OF THE FLORIDA POWER C LICHT EASeMENT.
,. Restaurants. Including faat food rataunnu
2. Utlllt.arlan. reeretUonal. educational. and medIcal
uses and servl~
3, Bu.lnus and profeulonaJ of'nC:UJ nnanclal
lns.tJtut1on.
.. Any other un which 11 determined by the Plannlngl
ZonIng Director' to be c:ornpanbll and/Df' c:ampatlbl. ..Ith
the the lIated permitted u....
B. Act:.saory U...:
1 , Ac:ceasory UStI and structuru which .,.. cuatarnarlly
a.lOdated with the permitted UHll
z. Project sales and admlnlstntJve Gfnca .nd fac:lI1t16
3. SIgns.. permitted by tht Com... County Zimlng
Ordinance In effect at the lime of appllclltlon fOf' tM
sl9ft pennlt
17
&00( 033 fl'tt 101
il..
. .....
,
.
-
Ag_tem No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 98 of 158. ,
.. Carotaker'a ....Idenc:a aubJect to SectIon ...., 0' the
Zoning Ordln.nc:a
5. A pttrl_ter aecurlty ron.. .nd/or ..II, not to oxcad .
,..t In heIght
S. T....po..ry a.wll\lO lrootment '1ldIlU.. In the .... 110
Indicated on tho proJoel Mootor Development PI.n. Such
t....po..ry 'ocIllU.. !MY ..rvo, tho project until public
or othet' county approved 0" lIto aowet"ll\lO ..rvlco la
av.nabl.. Tho tlmporary lowll\le t...tment plont .nd all
.noel.ted 'ocIllU.. Ihall ba ..t bock . mInimum of 50'
,..t from the boundarloa 0' the troct which It
occupl.. .
7. Malorlal which la ""ClIvated during con.lructlon oi the
leke whIch ""cada In amount the moterl.1 required fOl"
dovolopment 0' tho project _, be I'*'IllIYtId f....... tho
proJoet. Approvll from tho County Engln"r Ind tho
Plennlng/Zonlng Director sh.1I be rllqulred to l"Ur. no
n"iaUvo Impacts on lurroundlng landa 01" on Impocted
roada. Mltlg.tlon IMllur.. may be required If do-.!
approprlato .nd noce...ry by th. County Englnll. .nd/or
Planning/ZonIng Director.
II
~ 033 F1r.1 W2
1.,2,2. DEVElOPMENT 5TANDAltOS
~ ---,,_._~-_. ,,- . ,"" ._.~_...
-
. ~r~~' .
~:~ .
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
-"ber9,2010
~ge 99 of 158.
.~.~
.~~
A. Minimum Parcol 51,,,:
w..t of F.P. &: L. ..a_nl: ,.....
EoII of F.P. &: L. ......nt: 2 IICrU
8. l.I1nlmum P.rcal Width:
Weal of F.P. &: L. __nl: 150 roel
#
Eo.Iof F.P. &: L. ....m.nl: 200 foel
C. l.I1nlmum Vard..
Weal of F.P. &: L. ..a_nl: rronl. .Ida and rur yard.: 25
r..t unlo.. odJolnlng par""l. ar. Jointly plannod, In whIch
ca.. tho adjoIning sid. yard r"qulr_nll may be w.lvad or
modlOod during the SDP approval proc....
Eacl of F.P. &: L. ..._nl:
Front yard- 50 reet
It.... yard- 50 f...1
SId. yard- 25 f..l. unlce. odjolnlng parcals are jointly
plannod, In which call th. adjoining sid. yard roqulremonta
may ... wolved or modified during tho SOP .pproval pr<>eeu.
"
,HI: 033 fI'.! 103
IS
----_..__._-.~.._-,.
Agend:!rltem No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 100 of 158
In thoso InstanCl. ..harl multlplo bundlnga ora to occur on
a alngla alto, yard roqulromonte aholl plrtaln only to the
eltl boundarl... not to .0p.raUon btlw...n bulldlnge. On
alia mulllpla building ..pa..lIon adoquacy sholl bo
dotaMIIlnod durl"", tha SOP approval p..ocoss.
No mora than 20\ of roqulred yarde may be devoled to
vehicular drivas and parkl"", apocoe.
D; l.I1nlftlum On Slta Natur.1 and/or lneblled Landseoptt ArKI
w..t or F,P. , L. o..nmont: 20\ of gross slta ....
Eact of F. p, &: L. a.....ont, 30\ or groaa alto .ra.
The term "L.andoc:aptt Aru' 'a construed to Includo
fountains, pools. ponds .nd othlr w.ter fo.tur"".
...Iks. torrllCOl, courty.rds and other pod"trlan .poco.
..han ouch non-botanical r..tu.... do not o"caod 15\ of the
roqulrod .roa,
E. 1.10",- BuildIng HIlghll
'.
Hot.lt. motols and offlce buildIngs I 5 .tor..... excopt that
such ua" whIch .... clnor th.n 350 root to lha Coldon Cato
Canal mey not ."cud 3 Itarl...
All other un.. 3 atorl..
20
Uk 033 r1,dDt
. .'. ",
4"'~ .
\,;,' ~.
.:
-
-
AgeflilllWm No 17C
~er9, 2010
Page 101 of 158
Taller building. may be authorlzod upon appllcatlon.
following aclvartlaod publlc haarlnlls with duo publlc nollCl.
by 1M Collier County PI~nnlng Comrnl..lon and tho Board 0'
County Comml..lon.ra. a r...........nd.Uon by tha com... County
Planning Commlulon. and appl'O'Val by lh. Board of County
Comml..lon..... Prl.... to authorizing. tall... building.
det.rmlnatlon shall be made by tha County thal th. naturI or
the usa to which tha building II to be davoled wa.....nta tho
oddltlonal halght. that tho Illll.r building will not
dopr.<:IIIo th. Int.nded charocl.r and quality of th. ov....1I
Cltygato proJocl. and Ih.t It wlll nol hava n"iallv. Impacts
upon surrounding proptlrtlce or ... datrlmental to th. publlc
..tr.re.
F, MInimum Prlnclpal Building FI_ A...:
, ,000 squ_ foot (Gasoline ..rvlca atatlons .... IlCOmpt rrom
thl. standard.l
C. IoIerchandlsa Storoga and Display: Thoro shall be no oulIlda
NfII\l' .... dIsplay of _rchondlla,
H, UUIIUce: Electrical. lolophon. and l.lltVlslon sorvlc:o "
IIn.. shzll ba placed undorground. Pad mounted lronsronnera
and other compononll of undorground sorvlc:o Iylt.... which
ar.. normally localod abovo ground shall ... plocod and
ocrHnod so as not III be vlclbl. r....... a .lreet right-of-way
or an adJoining proparty,
Uf( 03~ pl'.ll05
'-----.-.---.-- ..-..---....-". -- '....,.,t_
Age " 'tP.m No, 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 102 of 158 '~i
;tj
.. .,,;,{~:
r"
'I
';l,;
'ij
,": ~ .
." ~
""1~
-
I. ParkIng/Loading: orrat.....t parking and ,...dlng apacot ahall
be provIded In accord wIth tlto atanderds of tho Colllor
Countv ZonIng Ordlnanca .In "'act ot the time of building
parmll application. ParkIng and loadIng rlldlltl.. ahall be
so arrangod that bocklng Into. Dr Dut of. a str...t rlght-of-
way I. unn.....ury.
J. PorlO<'lll&nc:a Standard.: NolM, odor, ylbratlon, lll- I..
dlfforontlatod f....... vonorol illuminatIon), amoko and dust
roodlly dotoctabla by human eons.. .t proporty boundary
IIn.. sholl not ""end tho background JlVlta charactorlstlc
of retail commerclal ...... In the evont coma or oil of
thaca porronnonc:a chaMlClorletlCl ara fII\lulatod by
appllcabl. foderal. stata. and/or local low. .uch
fII\lulatlone sholl control.
U... which gono..to apttelol or ho.ardDus ....to sholl not be
...tabll.hod or ponnlttod to opttnta unl.... dlflnltlvo plana
ror dullng with the waet. product hava boon approved by all
lI\Ionclos wllh Jurisdiction ovor tho mallar, Further. said
u... aholl be gov.rnod by .11 eppllcabll rodarol. .tata. .
....d/or local lawo a. ...v be edDpted or ......,dod from time to
tI...,
Tho futuro. parronun.. chlroct.rlotlcc of . V1vOfl lond un
Ut( 033 W.\ 106
Z2
1o:...................."i;i,
o.;(,:,,'W,t.I..""
...~-~
0{
,
':!
Ag~m No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 103 of 158"1':'"
'.
."
. . ,,-
-
-
or. of ton nol predlctabl. with occuracy at tha time 0'
buildIng permit I..uonee, Tho abovo lI.ted pirlo.....nc.
.tand.rd. not only opply ot tho II.... lond u... or.
InlUotad, but .ro conUnulnll Plrlo.....nca obligations.
unll" overridden by appncabl. fed....I, stall, and/or local
low.
1(, Coldon Cat. Canol Buffer rlqulr_nll: Dev.lopm.nl of sit..
which abut tht Cold.n Cato Con.1 sholl Includo In.III1.Uon
of landscapa and/or .tructural burr.... which In.ur. that
r..ldontlally .oned proper\IH on th. north .Id. of tho
canal aro nol subJected to Inapproprlat. vI...., Buff....
.h.1I ... shown on sit. dovolopmonl plana IS required by
Socllon 2.5.B. In evaluatIng tho burrer compon.nl or sIt.
d.valopmont plans. tho Planning/Zoning Olrector shall
dotormlna odequocy of Ih. planned burrer. taking Into
account tha notur. of thl planned elt. utllhatlon. tho .
charoclor of tho planned structural.). and tho prHenco of
nalurol vegotatlon which _111 be loft In ploco Ind which
will contrlbut. to th. buff...lng function. At 0 mInimum.
th. burf... odjocont th. Coldln Cata Canal sholl comply with
tho stondard. of Section 1,37 or th. ZonIng Ordinance, Tha
troo and shrub .pocIH, .1.... and splldng shan b. approved
durin\! th. Slta Oov.topm.nt Plan Ipprovll procHS. and If
doomed to bo nlCl..ary by th. Plonnlng/Zonlnll Director,
.hall be mort oxt.nslvl than required by Soetlon 1.37.
IOK 033~J"t 107
-
-
A~tem No. 17C
ber 9, 2010
age 104 of 158
L. WIUand p.....rva Sotbaclcc: Wh.n all or I portion 0' I
'.\ ~
.
wIU.nd p....rvl I. localod on I building silo, no building
may ... located dOlOr thon 20 foot .nd no pIV&llMlnt may be
closor than 10 foot to the prKarva boundary. Procls.
dlllrmlnaUon of tha pr.slrvl bound.ryshall occur during
the Slta Dev.lopment PI.n review and IPPrqva\ pM>COlI.
Pr...rvl arus shown on thl Mall.r Plln shall oleo ba shown
on th. Subdivision pI.t. along with I notaUon rororondng
tha Clt)'90lo c...Olll.... Park PUD.
.'
:~ .
.
"f
". .'
,
100l 033 plr,! 108
n
.,
.~
~
';;.
.
,
'I
d
~.~.
.,
;:
"
-
Ag_tem No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 105 of 158
SECTION tV
ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
It.\. PUItPOSE
Tha purpo.o 0' Ihl. Soellon Is to ..t forth tho a11pul.llons by
the EnvIronmental Advtaory Council, Th. devolopment of thl
projocl .hall be lubJect to lhas. sllpulsUonel
11,2. OEVELOPER ReOUIREMENTS
A, Th. d.voloper 0...11 ... subjocllo Ordln.nco 75-2\ lor the
trool vegltatlon r.......al ordInance In oxlst.nc. al tho II....
0' pannlUlng I. requiring th. acquisition or a I.... ra''''','lal
pannlt prior to any land claarlng, A sa. clurlng plan
shall ... submitted to th. Natural Roaourc.. ManO\lltlMnt
Department for thalr ravl_ and approval prior tD any work
on the alII. Thll plan may ... eubmltted In phon to
colncld. with tho dovllopmont .chodul.. Tha alto c10arlng
plan shall cloarly doplct how th. Onal alt. layout
Incorporalu rolllnad natlva vegetation to tho maximum
oxtlnt poulbla and how roade. building.. lok.., parking
lots. and olhor foclllllu hova tam oriented to.. ,..,dato
thl. goal,
'.
lOA( 033 ~1'.1109
15
., '
Agenda Item No. 17C .
November 9, 2010:<A
Page 106 of 15~f
'~4!
~
-i!I
~';
'i
.)0;
.{~
NaUvo .plldos .hall ba utlllud. whlre Ivallabla, to the
ma"lmum Ilttent poulblo In thl slta landocaplng "doslg". A
land.caplng plen will be .ubmlttod to the Natural Raaoun:os
Manavomont Oopartmont and tha Community Dovolopment DM.I"",.
for their rlvl.. Ind Il>proval. This plan will doplct the
Incorporation or notlvo speel.. and theIr mix with othor
spoel... If any. Tho goal or alto landacoplng ahall be the
roti.tabll.hmont of native vogatatlon and habitat
charoclerl.Uca loat on \hI slto during conclnlctlon 01' dua
to put -=tlvltl...
All o"oUc planto. .. donned In the County Cedi, ....11 be
rlllllOVod rrom devolopment arao.. opon .pOCO ...1... and
proslrvl aroo. during alch ph..o of conllnlctlon. Following
sit, dovolopmont, 0 conUnulng molntll\anco program .hall be
Impl.....ntod to prlvont relnvaalon 0' tho .Ita by such ilxoUc
.ptteloa. Tho malntonanca plan. whIch dHCrlboa control
tochnlquas and In.poetlon Intorvals shall ... submitted to
..nd opproved by Ihl Noturol Roaourcoa Manogomont Olpartmont
and tho CommunIty Dovllopmont DivIsion,
If. during thl cour.. of slto cloarlng, tlCcevaUon. or other
conllnl,:tlonal ectlvlUo., on archnologlcal or hl.torlcal
sill. arUfect, or othlr Indicator Is dIscovered. In
dovllopmont at that location .hall be Immedlatlly ltopped
ond tho Natural R...ourc.. Managomttnt Oopartment ""tlnod.
utI O3atl'.1110
_to. -
UO( 033 tl"tl11
Agenda Item No. HC
November 9,2010 ,
Page 107 of 158 ,'::i
..-ii
}~
"..
'<I'
..."...
DIVllopment will ba lusp.ndod for II .urfldent length of
time to .nobl. th. Ncturol Resourw Manll\lomont O.partment
or a d.slllnatod con.ulta~t 10 ...... thl find .nd ddormln.
tho propar cours. of actlon In ragard to III oaIVll\l..blllty.
Th. Natural ResourCH Manog......t Dopartment will respond to
any .uch notlllcatlon In a lImoly .nd .rllclont IIIllnnar 110 ..
to provldl only . mInimal Inlorruptlon to constructIon
oc:tIvltles,
E. Prior to dovllopmttnt In aurroundlng 0..... .etland p....arv.
...... ",Ill ... Oll\l!lod by ths patltloner. WoUand boundarl..
will ... subJect to tho ravl... .nd approval of NRMO.
F. To Incr.... I.ka productivity and habitat valu... laka lIdo
alopao will be ~: lout to a dopth or 3' r....... ....n low w.ter
levII., Potltlon.r oholl lnvuUlIata voglllUng littoral
ahllf Iran wIth various naUv. pllnt apttel.. I upon roquest.
NRMO can provlda pertinent Informatlon concerning planl
opttel..I,
"
Q, PeUtloner ahlll d..lgn and Implement. prog... to pravont
and/or redUCI populations or no"louo/lXollc plant
populstlon. within tho I.kolsl, apttelrlcally, but.not
IImltad to. provlntlng growth or hydrllla I Hvdrllla
vlrtlclllalol. wltor hyacinth I Elchhornla c....lp'" I. and
2'
----_.-.~....- ~_..- '.. ..." . .
Agenda Ilem No. 17C,
November 9,2010,:'1
Page 108 of 15811
,H
(to a I..... dll\lrHI cattalll IT""ha Iltlf'2!1lll thll
prog...... will be subject to \ha rovl.. and approvll 0' NRMD.
H. A aurvoy r or tho pr..anc:a and dlltrlbutlon of tho protected
Rod Cockodod WoocIpacker I Picold.. boreall.1 mud be
a>nductod by quellned porsonnll aubjoct to app1"OY1l1 by
NRIolD. Itl.ulll of the aurv.y mu.t be n:ade avallabl. to NItMD.
Manll\l_nl plan. shan b. aubmltted 'or ..vi.. and approval
to tho U.S, Fish and Wlldllfa Servlco end tho florida C_
and F....h Wat.r FIsh Commllllon ..,d NRMD, If n""....ry, the
project dosllln and PUD .Ma.t.r Oovllopment Plan .holl be
adjustod to Insure the aurvlval of tho protectod apocln.
I, Whera appllcabl.. dua to dev.lopment, componontc or plant
communlU.. will be tron.plantod withIn p....orv. 0...... and/
or .. IondlCllpa elomontc within tho project, Ex...pln of
pl.nt apocln approprlttlo for transplant would Includ. u!>ol
p.l.... (S.bal p.'metto). and buttorny orchId. IEncvc:lla
tam......,.j.
J. Du. to tho a>ncom of tho uS'/llanarotlon of huardoua
.ubolonCl1l. III bu.ln...... proposed ror the parcol muat be
.ubject to the revIew and approv.l of NRMD.
'.
MIl 033wd,12
u
~'."'<It...
AgellliaJiem No. 17C
NOvember 9, 2010
Page 109 of 158
SECTION V
TRAFFIC AND ENCINEERINO REQUIItEldENTS
PURPOSE
Tho purpoea of thl. Socll.n II to ..t rorth tha trornc
Improv-'1l roqul.......,lI whIch thl project daveloper mutt
ulldortak. a. an Intagrol part of tha projocl d",,"lopmenl.
1,2. DEVELOPER ItEOUIItEMENTS
A, Accaa to thIs slta rrom clt '51 may p......,t doc\gn probl-
duo to tho limited dlltanc:e beb...., Coldan Oato Canal and
tho limited IoCCOU rlghl-of-way ror \-75. Accos. drlvoc onto
CR !1St ahall ... IImltad to tho oxllUng ono whIch allgOl
with the woler lrutment plant _a drive .nd ono
addltlon.1 which may ... \oc:ated north of Iho "'lltlng IICCOI&
drlvo.
B. Tha ..doting IIC:COIS road whIch o"tttndl southerly r....... eR !IS'
and thon ...tarly parzllll to 1-75 1h&1I be roconstructod to
a minimum four lano dlvldad roadway from the cR 951
Inl....octl.n to tho southw...t comer of tho CIIyg.to
proparty 01 such time .. trcfflc volumoc on tho road link
warrant. the. four l"n1n;. In the event that. . &lgnlncant
"
I~( 033 PI',! 113
2t
----- _.~.
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
N.er 9, 2010
110of158
-
rrectlon of the lrIrnc on the I'Md link I. not 1I.noroted by
tho cltygata project. tha CltY9&ta pro)act ahell pay .
portion of thl four lanlng COlt which Is aqual to III
Ir.rflc Impact,
C. Tha drIveway to thl wator trootment plont sholl be widened
to " mInImum of 2It foot If It Is utlll.od .. an IICCUS to
tha adjaconttncllt.
D. Tha cion spacing of th. CR 95t/landflll OCCOIS rood
Int...netIon and tho landOIl aa:... rood/..t.. plant entry
drlv. Int....ectlon ..III cau.. lrIrnc control probl..... as
traffic volumu through tho two lntarsectlona lncr..... In
ordor to ovoid unn_nary oggravaUon of U-. problema by
tr.rflc mev_nil Into and out of tho .....I.."lel allK ..hlch
are dosost to tho Int....ectlon., aplldal attanUon ahell btt
gIven to Ihe location of antry/I"lt drlvoc "hen alto
dav.lopmonl plan application. for .llK abutting tho watar
plant OCCOII drlv. and the landfill IlCCllI& road ..0 being
ravlowad. It lhell be und.l'ltood that tho numb... of llCCQ.
polnll ..Ill ... lImltod In n:nnbttr.
e. Approprlota l.rl and right turn Ion.. shell be provided on
CR 9$t and tho landfln ~ss rood at sll proJect _...,
Street IIllhUng _hell be provldod at -Jor lICCKa polnb par
County roqulr_lI.
100< 033 fl"I114
30
'.
-
-
Ag~m No. 17C
~ber9, 2010
Page 111 of 158 .;
.~
..{J
.
~
-
:~
",..
F, Trarnc slgnlls sh.1I be In.talled at CR 1S1 _. polnta
whon d.-d .......nted by the County Engln..... Tha algn.l. .
ah.1I ... ownod. operated. end molntalned by \hI County. The
cllygatl project shall pay a fair .ha.. portIon of thl
sIgnal InatallaUon COlla.
0. Th~ abovo lmprovllllllnll .r. con.I....od -olt. ..I.t..... ..
doflnod by Ordlnlnco "-55 and shall not be .pplled II
c:radlta toward any Impect foa roqulred by that onI1nanco.
H. Dltallad alto drolnogl plana shall be aubmlttad to the
County Engln...r for revlow, No conatructlon pormlta ohall
be I..uod unl"'l and until approval of tho proposod
construclln In ac:cordanco with tho submtUted plan. I.
granted by tho County Engln.....
I. An oxcavatlon Permit will be roqulred fOf' tha proposed lak.
In occordanca wIth Collier County Ordlnanca No. 10-2&. ..
...."dod by Ordlnonce No. 13-3. and as may be ...."d.d In \hI
futuro.
"
&001 lJ:l:lrl-tjlj[fj
(
31
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 112 of 158 ;
d;
.,.1'
. .. =}t ~
..'it.
, .:....
. ::.:~
.~.
SECTION VI
UTILITIES REQUIREMENTS
&.1. PURPOSE
Tha pur"... of thl. SecUon I. to let forth the potable
wallr, Irrlgatll>l'l wltlr. Ind ..wor utllltlu raqul.-nla
which tht projoc:t dlVoloptr la coritmltlod to moot,
&,2. DEVELOPER REQUIREMENT!!
A. Wttar distribution and _11\I0 collection and Inncml.slon
.y.t.... wl/l be con.truclod throughout tho project
devolopmont by tht devoloptlr pUrluont to all currant
roqul,.omonta of Collier County and the Stoto or FIOI'lda~.
W.I.... .nd _er foclllUH condruc:t.od within platted
rlghts-of....y or wllhln uUnly ...._to roqulrod by tho
Counly .h.1I be convoyed to tha County fOl" ownorshlp.
oporltlon and malnlon.nco PUrpollH pur.uant to opproprlate
County Ordln.ncos and r"iulatlon. In effect at the time of
convlyanCl, All walar and ....11' 'oclllUu con.tructed on
prlvoto property ond not roqulrod by tho Counly to be
located within utility I.._nt. shIll ... ownod. oporotod
and maintained by tha Oovolop..r, hi. ...Illn. or .uccu.......,
Upon complotlon of conrtructlon or lhtt ..oter and _or
'.
tOOt
033 P1!oI1i6
31
Age~em No 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 113 of 158
~{
"~:
faclllUIS ..Ithln tho project. tho foclllUIS ..III ba losted
to Inluro thay m...t Colllar CountY'1 uUllty con.trucUon
raqulr_nla In orrect at tho tlma con.tructlon pl.n. ....
approvod. Tho abovo talk. mu.t bo completed to tho
uU.racUon of tho U\1I1t1.. DMllon prior to placing .ny
uUllIy 'aclllUIS, counly owned or prJvatlly owned. Into
sarvlco. Upon complotlon of tho wator and/or lower
focllltllS and prior to tho IlIuanco of cortlOcato. of
Oc<:upancy for .Iruclu.... wlth!n tho project tho utlllty'
racllltl.. .han be convoyod to Iho County. ..hen required by
tho UUIILlu Division, pursuant to County Ordlnancu .nd
Regulation. In orrect ot thl tlma convoyanco II roquuled.
B. All conatrucUon planl and lochnlcal spaclflcatlons .nd
proposod piau. If appllcablol. for the proposed water
d!.trlbullon and sewago collection and Ironsmlnlon
'acllltl.. mUll be revlo..od and approved by tho UtllltI..
01vlllon prior to commttncarnont of conltructlon.
C, All cu.tomers connecting to the water dlatrlbutlon and
a_ago colloctlon hcllltlce ..1II ... cu.tomers of tho County
and wlll bo blllad by tha Counly In KCOrdanca ..Ith tho
County's ..tabll.hod ralce, Should thl County .not bl In .
po.ltlon to pmv!do ...tlr and/or ....er sorvlco to tho
project. tho wator ond/or lO..or cu.tomers shall bo cu,Iomors
or thl Int.rlm utility ..tabll.had to ,orv.. tho project
'.
aNi: 03a!1!,1117
-~_..-
Ag.ml!"!tem No. 17C
November 9,2010,'
Page 114 of 15M
it
. 'I
until tho County" off-sltl w.ter and/or ...... flldlltl..
are .valloblt to Mf'VI thl projoct,
O. It Is anticipated thtt tha Cour,ty Utllltlos Dlvl.lon ..III
ultimately lupply potable water to II1tttt tho contumptlvo
domand tnd/ or racolva and u-.at tht aowll\lo gan....ted by thl.
project, Should tht County .ystom not .... In a poslUon to .
oupply potablo ,..tor to tha projoct and/or racolvo tht
pro/oct" wastowllar at tho tlmo dtvtlopment commonccc. tho
Dlv.loptlf', at hll o"panlt. ..III lnatall and Oparotl Intarl...
wiler lupply and on-slto troatmont focllltltl and/or Inttrlm
on-slto ....11\I0 trootm.nt and dl.poul focllltll. odaquato to
moot all roqulr_ta of the appropriate ~ulatory
8!lonclts.
E, An Ag..........t sbell be onterod Into tatwoon tho County and
tht Dovtloptlf'. bInding on tho, Oav..loptlf'. hll ...Ign. or
ouc:couora. l8!lally occaptablo to tht County. prior to tha
approval of conltructlon clocumenta for tho propoaed proJect,
atotlng that:
'.
I. Tho proposed wcttr lupply and on-slta trootment
rocl/ltltl and/or on-sltt ....towlter u-._nt and
eIllpoul focllltl... If required. art to be conatructed
as parl or the propoaed pro/oct and mutt ... r"iardad ...
Intlrlm: they ,hall be c:onstructed to St&t. Ind Fed....'
'* ~tl..!i18
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
N.er9,2010
115 of 158
I
,~
. !ii
,~.".
..
~~.
.':~
;,
.,
standard. and Iro to be llWI\ed, oparotod and IIlOlnulnod
by the Devoloper. hie aulgnl or lucctlaorl IIntll IUch
tI"", eo Ihl CountY'1 ofr-.lto wator focllltlo. Ind/or
orr..IIo .owor focllltl.. Ire ava/lobla to aorvlea the
projo<:t, Tha Intorlm trostment focllltl.. .hall lupply
..rvlce. only to tho.. Ilnds owned by tho Devolopor and
approved by thl County for dlvllopmont. Tho ullltty
rocllltyll..1 may not b, "'panded to provlda walor
and/or aowlr ..rvlet oullldo tho dovolopment boundlry
approved by tho County wIthout tho wrltton con.lnt of
tho County,
2. Upon connection to tho County's or'-slta ..tll'
ftclIlU... and/.... cowor foclllU.., the llwa\optr, hI.
a..lgns or .UCCllSOro shill abandon. dl......tla and
rernc>v. r....... thl alto tho Interim wator and/or towage
tr.otment rlldllty and dlsconUnuo usa or tho wator
supply ,""urea, If Ipplleablo.ln a monnor consistent
with SIIII of Florid. .tandards. All work rolstad with
thl. _Ivlty sNII be performed st no coat to the
County.
".
3. Connection to tho County's of'-slto wolll' and/or sner
racl/lUo. will bl mode by tho _nor., !haIr oulgns ....
SUCClS"".. ot no cod to tho Counly withIn to dIy.
.rter such fac/llU.. tacomtt .v.llobll, The cn:t of
lOOl: 03il PI',! 119
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
Nc8IIIer 9,2010
~16of158
connection ,hall Includo. but not be limIted to, all
onglnHrlng dulgn and pr.pa..Uon of construction
dOCumentS. permltti"g, mi:.drnc:.t1.." or rtrll.tlng of
oxlstlng -"9" pumping flldlltl.. or construction of
naw mostor IOWagO pumpIng foclllU.., lntoreonnoc:UDn
with County orf-slto roclllll.., .Iler and/or sawer
IIn.. noc:nnry to mako tho connection Ie I, ltc,
fl. At tho Umo County orf-.ltl wltor and/or cower
rlldlltl.. 0" ovellobl. for tho proJoct to connect
wIth, tho follDwlng wotor .nd/or _or facllltl.. lholl
be convoyod to th. County pursuanl to approprleto
County Ordln.n..... and Rll\lulatlons In afrect at tho
limo:
o. All water and/or sower racllltlu constructod In
publicly owned rlghi..-of-woy or wIthin utility
.._1I roqulred by the County withIn tho
proJect limits r.qulred 10 ....k. conn_Ion with
tho County's off..lto ..1.... and/or acwor
facllltlu; or.
b, All water and sowor flldIlU.. roqulred to connocl
with the project to the County's of'-Sltl wet...
and/or ......r focllltlu ..han th.. on-.lt.. wator
and/or Itwor facllltles cr. con.tructed on privet..
IN( ooa.FI'~ 120
A
'~
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
.'" ber9,2010
117 of 158
.,\.
-n
~.,'
:,.:.h
-
properly and not roqulred by the County to be
located within uUl1ty aaa_nt.. Including bUI
not limited to tho followIng:
1, Moln .owll\lo 11ft .latlon and forca moln
Inlorconnoctlng with tho County .owor
focll1t1.. Including all uUlIly .......0011
nftCKury :
2. Wator dl.trlbullon foclllU.. from th. point
of connectIon with tho Counly'. wator
radlltl.. ID tho _.tar walar ...tar .ervlng
tha pro)ocl, Including all uUllty 0.._11
nece&nry .
5. Tha c:uatonoara Ht'Ved on on Intorlm b..,. by tho u1111ty
.y.l... conatructed by tha Oov..loper .hall boc:orntt
c:u.tomer. of the County .t tho Umo when County off.
.Ito tntor and/or .ower flldlltlu _ ovallobl. to
..rvl th. projoct and .uch connection I. madl. Prior
10 connoc:lIon of tho pro)ocl to tho County'. off-.lta
wator and/or .owor recl11Uo. tho DltYolopar. hI.
.ulgna, Dr .uccu..ro ohall turn over to tho County II
compllta lI.t of tho cu.t.....r. .orved by the Interim
uUI1Uu .y.t.... and .holl nol compato wIth tho County
r or tho IIrvlco of tho.. cud.....r., Th., DltYlloper
lOD( 033H;I121
31
"
/..-
.,.
.. ') ,
:~{
Agenda Item No. HC
November 9, 2010
Page 118 of 158
sholl .Iso provldo tha County ..Ith a d.tall" Invontory
of tho rocllltl.s ..rv" withIn tho proJect a"d tho
onUty whIch wlll bo rOlponslblo 'or tho ...tlr md/or
._or Mrvlca bIllIng fo~ tha pn>loc:t.
I. All constructIon plans .nd tachnlcal spaclncatlon.
ral.ted to con"oc:tlons to tha County'. off..lta wator
.nd/or....... facllltlu wlll ... .ubmltled to tho
Utllltloc ~ivision ror r""l.. and approvsl prIor to
__t of construction,
" Tha D""olopar, hls ..sign. or succ:asora ogI'H to pay
oil ayatam d""olopmont chorgoc at tho time that
BuildIng Pormlll are requIred, pursua"t to .pproprl.to
Counly Ordl"ancec and RogulaUons In affect at tho tlmo
of Pormll roquut. This roqulromont shall bo made. known
to .11 procpttcllvl buy.rs or proportla ror whIch
bulldlng parmI," wlll bl roqulred prIor to tho stort of
building construction.
,
I, Tho County will I..... to tho Devoloper for operatIon
and malntlnanCl tho w.Ior distrIbution .nd/or -8110
colloctJon and tranamlnlon syst... 'or tho sum or
$10.00 por yur, whan such SYlt... Is not connect" to
tho of'-slto Wltor and/or ...... rlldlltl.., ownod and
'* 033 rl'.t 122
1f
'.
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
~mber 9,2010
~ge 119of158
op....ted by the County, Torml of \ha I.... sholl be
dllermlned upon complotlon of the proposed utility
constrUction and prIor to KtlvoUon of tho ..tor
supply. troatment and distribution flldlltl" and/or
Iho sowago colloctlon. Iranamllllon and troalmont
raeIllU... Tho L...., If roqulred. shall rornaln In
Irroct until thl County can provide water and/or lOWor
sorvlCl through Ita orf:sllo faelllU.. or until auch
time that bulk rala wslor and/or IIwor ..rvleo
ag...-nta oro nogoUstad with tM Interim utility
systom ..rvlng tho proloet.
F. Data required undor County Ordlnonc:e No. .112 shewing tho
avallablllly of aowago torvlco. muat be submlltod and
approved by tho UtlIlU.. Division prior to opproval 0' ~
construction documonta 'or tho project. Submit a copy, of
tht approved OER parmlta for tho IWagO colloetlon and
tnnsmlsslon systems and tho wo.towolor treotment foclllty
to ... uUII.ed, upon rocolpt thoreo',
"
C. Ir on Intorlm on-slto ..stor supply.. traotmenl and
transml..lon flldllty Is ullll.ed to ..rva tha propoaod
project. II musl b.. proparly sl.ed to supply avOrll\!" and
paak day domoatle damand. In ,addlllon to fI,.. now domand st
a roto opprovod by tho approprloU FIr< Control District
..rvlclng tho project oru,
Uk
033,..,\123
n
(
"
...~..~.-
Agenda Item No. HC
November 9, 2010
Page 120 of 15
II. Cons\nJctlon and ow~orlhlp 0' tho watar and lOWor
.
'1ld1lUol, Including Iny proposed Intttrlm wstor ond/or
""11\I0 lroa_l flldllUOl, lhall ba In compllanco with all
Utl1lUos ~ivIsion Standards. Pollcl.... Ordlnancoa.
Proctlcoa, ole. In Iffoet ot tha tlmo COftl\nJlO1.lon spprovo'
. Is roqu"'led.
I. Ootailod hydraulic doclgn "porta COllaring thl wit..
distribution and aowlI\II colloetlon and lronllllllllon sysl_
to corvo tho proloet mull ba "ubmltted wIth Ihl COftltruc:t.lon
doeumonta r~ the project. Tho roporta Ihall lilt III
d...lgn luumpUon., dttmond rat.. and other foetorl portlnonl
to the Iyel... undor the conlldlratlon,
J. '<<hln the Counly hoa thl ablllty to provldo -11\II troo_t
"
and d1"poul IOrYlCH. tho Owoleper. his ..llgnl or
auccasaora ..111 ... r...ponllblo to connoet to lhua
roclllU... 01 0 polnl to be oltabllahed by Iha Counly. with
tho Devoloper Illuming oil cosla ror tho connection work to
be parrormed.
K. Thl County hoa nol yot dtlormlned .hather the Cltygoto
proloet will be dulgnlted II a lroctod ~o IIfnuoot
receiving Ir... Prior to prtparaUon of dennltlv. centra'
Uk 033,1"t124
u
..'
" ..
.~ .'. .
'.
-
-
Aiinda Item No. 17C
ember 9, 2010
age 121 of 158
IrrlgaUon plana for tha Cltygato project. approprlalo Input
ahall be obtaIned from tho county to Insuro that appllcabll
county .rnu.nt un plsn. an compiled ..Ith. I' and ..hen
tho CDunty doslgnstoe tha Cltygalo proJect aa . traated
_11\I0 efnuent ncalvlng 0..... tho Cltygat. Oavelopor. hla
....\9nl or .uccu.sor:. .h.lt conctruct th. necaaury
faclllU.. ror us. or th. troatad ..wago .rnu.nl for
irrIgation purpos.. end potentl.lIy ror Or. fl_ purpo...,
Tha Cltygal. dov..lopar IIllIY be ...Ignod ....pon.lblllty for
provIdIng .11 rlqulrad pipIng and pumping hclllU.. from
the County'. poInt of dollv.ry to tha project. and may ...
r.qulrod to provld. "'.1 ....th.r storag. raclIlU... as
roqulred by DER. conslsl.nt wllh th. vol....... of treated
efflu.nt 10 ... utlllzod. Th. treated effluent distribution
sy.tcn, If roqulred. ahall be constructad pursuant to tho
findIngs of . dalllled. county .pproved hydrovllc d..lgn
raport. Th. roport sh.1I not all dnlgn a..umptlono.
demand roln. and oth.r factors portlnttnt to tho
dl.trlbutlon oyst_, Treated Irflulnt suppllod to tho
project will ... aubJttcl to tho county's ..tabllohod rsto
schedul..
L, Prior to approval or con.tructlon documenta by tho UtlIlU..
Division. tho D.voloper must pr....nt verlflcatlon, pursuant
to Chapllr 367. Florida Sutut... thot th. Florlcl& Public
1M( 033H"t~
~1
"
,
Agenda Item No. 17C
~mber9, 2010
Page 122 of 158;
jir
:t ';
';;'1':'"
~', I
. ~"..f~. .
'ift
J I ~
::r
..~i,
iJ:
Servlco c-Inlon haa grantod terrltorl.1 rlghta to tho
Oovslopar to provld. sower and/or w.lor aorvlc:a lo tho
proloct. If In Inlarlm trlltment, foclllty Is required. unUI
thl County can provldl th.... &lrvl.CII through Ita ,,"t.,. Ind
sowar faclllU..,
1.1. No IIPUC unka ... parmlUod to alrve .........nont ......._.-cl.I,
IndustrIal. or slmll.r USK. TllllporaI'y a.pUc tank. which.
corvo temporary &II.. foclllU.. 01' othor lomporaryu_
prIor to the avoll.bUlly of C1nt..1 IOWISlO t..atment
rocUlU.. may bl uUlhod In Kcord with F, D. E, R,
standarda.
N. Any ...tabllshmont rllqUlrlng . CCPHU permIt must aubmlt plan.
rOl' revl.. and approval,
o. Ir I VogotaUvI ba,.,.l.. Is plocod around tho packll\lo
lntatmont plant Ind/or land dlspoalll 0..., tho ESPcD
n._..._nds that It be located In I mannor so It cIooa not
arrect tho propar oporstlon of tho Irlatmont procas.
P. The ESPCO rl_nds that tho poUtlon..r Joc.to thl land
appllcatlon sll. _.Y r...... sny dralnll\ll dItch .nd/.... ow.ta
lhat may .rrect th. propar':i ope..Uon 0' tho tlnd cllspoaal
.Ito,
'* 033tll.l126
u
'.
-
SECTIOIl VII
RED COCKAOED WOODPECKER MANACE!.IENT PLAN
The Itod Cocked.d Woodpadc.r (RCW). Plclod.. Bo;..all.. 1.0 protoctad
.pacloa of plnl rorllt dw.lI1ng wlldUfl, DurIng planning of tho
Cltygat. proJIlCI. ..v.ral Rod CockededWoodpack.r n..t tr.... w....
Identified on tho sao, and detormlnatlon wa.....d. thai. number of
Red Cockadad Woodpadc.r. utili.. somtI of tho nost tr.... .nd foragl on
th. pin. forasted portion. 0' th. Cltygat. .110. a. Will a. on
adjoinIng ofr oil. pin. forested land.. A Rad Cockadad Woodpacker
Managamont Plan no propared. Incorporated In, and approved oa part of
.th. Dev.lopmenl of Rll\llonal Impact application. Th. .Iamonta of tho
plan hev. """" lncorpor.ted In the CltY90ta Ma.ter Oov.lopmont Pion
and thl. PUD documont. Th. cantr.l '.atu... of the Monll\lement Plan hi
an agr_I to direr d.v.lopment of a 72!; ocra ..... which -"racK
the ncel tr..... I bufr.r 0' pIn. ror..t around tho noat tr.... and 0
corridor of pin. rorut whIch connoeta th. nut tr... to .ach oth.r '.
and to ul.tlng ofr-.110 pin. fOrllted land. on which tho bird. now
forll\lo. 10 long II tho bird. contlnuo their ."llIln9 nutln9 pattern,
Tha 72!; ocro Interim pra..rvl ar.. to IndlClted <on the Mooter
Dav.lopmonl PIon. a. aro thl nut tr... location. .nd ~ foot dl_Ier
clrclo. around ..ch nut IrH. A(tlr planning of tha cltygote pn>lect
.... Inltl.Iod. . rorool Or. .evonly burnad 0 Ilrvo portIon of the
a. m~fl"t127
~"!.-........,..,,.
...~ ' ..,..~,~~.....~
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
_mber9,2010
-page 124 of 158
CltWOll Jltl. In~ludlng appro~lrnatoly h.lf of the InterIm p....orv.
_a. Many of th. pIn.. In thl burnld 0... have dlld, and th. FlorIda
F......... s.rvl.. ,.dV1.... thllt phi. d.ath "Ill conlin.." ,.... ""'''MlI
yo..., Th. long tar1ll Impect of tht f.....t flr. on utlll.atlon of the
.... by Red Cockodod Woodpockor. etnn.t. be forocut .wlth IlCCUrocy. but
IIftftual monitorIng of the bIrds will ,provldo the nndod Information.
Tho followIng maRlI\I-..t/monltorlng octlvlll.. aro an Int"i...1 part of
tho Rod Cockodod Woodpocker Man~ant Plan end of thlJ PUD documont:
I. Prior to Isautnet of con.tructlon .pproval for tha slrHII.
. '
dralnago flldlltl... utIllU... atc. In s proJect
dovolopmtnt phon. I Red Cockoded Woodpockor JUrvoy
utilizing approvod methodology will ... conductod to In.ura
thtt the blrda havt not ..tabllshod nut etvltloa In tht
plannod conl\r\lctlon ...... Tha survey ahall occur withIn SO
day. of tho .tart of constructIon, and If It la dtttonnlned
that Red Cocksded Woodpackor n..t cavltl.. havo b...n
utabll.hod In tho con.Iructlon .rM, dotor1lllnallon .hall ...
mado by tht ~ncl.. rOlponslbla for Rod Cockodod Woodpocker
protaclJon laws .. to the noel..lty of modIfyIng tho Red
Cockodod Woodpockor Managomant Plan.
2, Annual Ited Cockodod Wt>Odpocker .urv.y. utilizing .pprovod
methodology will bo undortaken until five yoe.. oft... find
l.GIt 033,1<,\ 128
~,
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
_e 125 of 158
-
bulldout of tho Cltyg.to project. with r..ulla of tha annuDl
.urvoy. to .... furnl.ho<! '0 the Florida 0.... and Fre.h Wet.r
FI.h Commllllon. tho Southwoct FlorIda RlI\Ilon.1 PlannIng
Councll. end Collier County wIthIn 30 day. of survey
completion,
3. Melalouca end other ""otic Vl9ltatlon wIthin tho Itod
Cockado<! Woodpeck.. pr.urv. .roa and al.ewhe... on thl
Cltygale .It. will ... orodlcato<!. thus sIgnificantly
onhancln51 the quality of RC1I foroga araa on .lto.
.. bcualvl undergrowth will ... controllo<! by burnIng and/or
by u.. of mechanIcal equipment.
, '
5. PIn. trots having. DSH of , Inch.. or mora. 1ocato<! outaldo
the RC1I prosarva but within tho rllqUlrod yard and burr...
ar.... In the rttmalndlr of tho .Itl. will be consorvod to
provldo addltlonal RCW fGrll\lo a...l.
" Land. wIthin tho RCW prourv. ..aa may ... utlll.ed for
IImllad ~tlonal purpoa.. IUch as wllkway., joggIng
Irall., picnic roc:lIIU.., ItC.. 10 long a. dlslurban"" to
naUvo vogatatlon 10 mInimal and thl roero.tlon.t octlvlU...
avoid tho ItCW n4at tr...,
"
aM( 033tN 129
,
'i-
t5
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
N~vItmber 9,2010
e 126 of 158
1. Undlrg......nd utllltl" and aurface drtlnll\l' ....1.. IlIIY croat
th. RCW pr...rva arlo.,
t. ThO pi"uafv" ....... will ... ....led with .Ign. which Indicate
th.I It II .n RCW presorve .nd that dlsturban.. of tho blrdo
Is prohlbllod and unlawful.
9. PrOposall to modify thl Cltygltt Rad Cockadad Woodpaclcar
Mana;mont PI.n may bo .ubmltled at any tI...,. Such propoaall
shill ... aupportad by I currant .UrvIY of on-.llo Rad
Cock.dod Woodpadcer nolllng and fllf'll\llng pattern.. and .udt
""dlllonal Information .. Is roqulrod to ....Iu.te the
propelod Manll\l-..t PI.n modlflcaUon. Tha rttlon.lo for
authorizing land. to ... romovtll rrom the RCW pruorv. .....
may 1..c1udl abandonmont of tho nut trau by the bIrd.
and! or . chango In tht ch.rocllr of th. plno r......t rorago
...... ruultl"ll In 0 10.. of tho habitat charoclerlsUca
roqulrtll by tha ItCW,
P, .,.....1. to modify tho ""'"O9",",,"l Plan sholl ... subcnlttad
to Cotlllr County.. on _ndment to tho cltygtta PUD, ..ll1t
copl.. to tho South_t FlorIda Rll\llon.1 Plannl"ll Council
and FlorId. C..... and Fr"h Wat.r Fish Comml..lon. Tho
Southw..t Florid. Itoglon.' Pl.nnl"ll Councll .nd/or tho
florida c- .nd Frith W.tar Flah Commission may provIde
_nil tnd rtcOmllllnd.tlonl to Comer County regardIng thl
propocod Monag_nt Plan modlflcallon.
lOk OiOw,tl30'
".''''~
,..'~ ~'. ~ . t".,
~,~k,", .
':'..
-
-
i\genda Item No. 17C._
November 9, 2010
_e127of158
Tha Planning! Zoning Dlroclor ahlll propar. a rcCOo..".ndatlon
r"ll.rdlng tho propocod Man"llOmlnt Plan modlncoUon: an
advortlsed public hlarlng &hall ... hold by the Board of
County commluloner&: .nd upon . flndln; of sultablllty tho
Board or- County Commlnlonlrc may. by . maJorlly yotl.
authorlza th. roquntod Manog_nt Plan modlOcatlon,
Tho FlorIda ,Came .nd Fra&h Waler Fl.h Commlulon hu
r_dod to tho Southw..t Florida Rll\llon.1 Planning
Council that . r"lllonal pl.n ... dovolopod which will r..ult
In tho public IICqulslUon of geogrophlcally sultablo
wUdllro habItat whch Is comporablo In _"nt and c:harocter
to wlldllro habitat whIch 1& loot to tho pl"OCOlll of
urbanlutlon within tho r"lllon, cornmlulon wlldllfo
blologlsll havo statod that appro"lmatoly 233 acros of tho
217 acra C/tygato &/to havo Iha charoctorl&Uca of Rod
Cockaded Woodpac\cor habitat, Tho CommIssion wlldllfo
blologl.ta hav. stotod tholr ""poctatle>. ~ that. upon
dovolopmenl 0: tho Cllygsto 1110 and surrounding lands. tho
axlsUng Red CocIc.dod Woodpod<orpoPulatlon will abandon tho
.r.... In apllo or tho ntabll&hmont of the C/tygtla Red
Cockadod Woodpecker p....rv. ..... and uaoc:lated Red
Cockaded Woodpoclcor manog_nl COlIll1Iltmenta. In tho event a
"'91.nll wlldllro hablt&I acqul.ltlon plsn I. odoptod. tho
purposI of which I. to mlUgol. wlldllfo hablut Iou to
urb.n devolopment In the "'lllon. lho Cltygolt pro)oel shall
"
IIf( 033t1..131
.~_...._-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
ilIIIIIIIPmber 9,2010
Page 128 of 158
... subloct to such lmpoc:t f_ or other Implomontstlon
m...u.... .. ar. 'awfully anoctod for the purpoa. of
Impl.....ntlng tho regional plan.
'.
IOOl ,033 tl'.1132
It
1",
-
-
..........,..,ttt.....
............ . .....tn.-.
-. , ......ttt....
.......... .. ............
......-
~fI\,IlMM......,..............
..... ....1.
---
--..
.--
..
ff' ..... ,; "":a
! = if IH~
:I - ':> i il
! j I j li n i
III ..
J
If ~ ..
11.. i I
1 r! -:11
~U 11 II
'Ill 033 '1',113,(
..
~
.. "" 8
-
'.
;
! .
~I! 11
Hi Ii !
c! :!
Ii' Ii'
II II
. .
IS !
.
sw- ~ !~ ! . IU ]
~ 1:.
.. li!. iJ .
i! ; - ~J
". "" ~ :i ~ a. f i fI il ~;Iil
... - ..
... .n ....
. . .
~ ~ .. .. fJ!f t~ld!1t
jl;lIl:! :! ~I J s ~ .,t.! i ... ~!1 ·
. , . .; a =i R l!l ! i:!lj ifi:;;1~; .
.. .. ..
. ..-t .. - ::;1 ::= j]J~iljil~~lf
. ... 1'1 '" ~ ~ ..1. 1- J = rL
! ;; '" 1-1 JI .5'1
I ... ... .n r;I ~ d;li l.1ijJji1
- ., '" 1'1 "'I .. ~~ili P!H'fl
- -
- II II ~ Ilt'II ft jJ'J -ff-' .
fil 'i .1 l!j;~I' }
nfij f'! 'Iii · .
N -"I ! = I' ! lll~! ~ir~ f;
. j!h:! It.-It&i
= i f. t: lflf !ii~&lj
J i"U -I
.. ~ I~~ ~t~mh
~JnU. . ~
... . ..J
II> ..J ,
. c-
c- .
, lL ..- -
~ ~ ~} 13= ...
" i I ! H I -
...
"'. ... 0
z
UK 033tl,~135
-
-
Ag~em No. 17C
_ber9,2010 I
eo" '" of '" r
Ag<llillili.llem No. 17C
~ber 9,2010
Page 132 of 158 j.j
'..
-
.' ,
These ule. aM I.rvlco. will prlllllrllY ._ Inuraute hl'iJhwoy
traval... and employ... 01' bUllneos.. within the project, .. opposed
to functJonlng aa a n.lghborhood mopping contar. .
,.h.ofl'lca.:atagorY Isllmli,ad to ..ttlen which .,-. prlnclpll u....
and cIoos not Include offlcoa which .... IItIdllary, to and Incorporotod
In othar land u..., I... admlnl.tratlv. orrico. within a light .
IIIInufacturlng or .....rch and d.v.lopment firm. Mo.t of tha offlc:u
wlllh.va exton.lv. IntarocUon wIth buoln.Il.. Ixtarn.1 to tho
project. but .om. will prlll\lrlly 'unction .. e:..rvante: of othar land
uue: wl~ln tho projoct. ,:
Parking apaca end ....ploy.. .stlmato w.r. larg.ly baud on IT! . .
.tandarcla and ava~.. dtod by Urban Land Instltuto publlcatlons.
Wh.n d.nnltlva publlahod parking a..d/ or ...p\oyoll .tondarda fOf' .
.pa<:lflc land u.. ..... not avall.bla. Ih'e ..tI....tft war. baaed on
publl.hod .tandarda 'or thl moot almllar u.... Tho a.t1motod .
employ... lncluda tho.. ..ho normally .p.nd all or moat of tho work d.y
within tho projoct. I... omca workers. cal.. p.....n".', Indultrlal
workors; ...ploy.... "ho Ihuttl. to and f....... th.lr pl_ of ...ploymlftt
during tho work d.y, I,., d.llvery truck crow.; and employ.... who
o.ldom vlalt tho project, I.., IIIInufocturer'. fI.ld ropro..ntaUvu.
It 10 anUclpated thot II\Inv or tha uon wIthin the project will ...
..rved by .-n parking pool. which lnor.au tho .ff1dlftcy of
parking .paco utlll.atlon. The ...ploy.... ..Umatad ror corvlco
otatlon. hotal/motal, rutauront/loung., and parhap. other u... will
... .prue! over two and, In """'" co..., th.... .hlfts within 0 2' hour
p.rlod .
100( 033 PI'.I 136
'.
-
-
Agenda Item No 17C
_ember 9, 201
age 133 of 15
DEVELOPI!ElI'I' ORDEIl u.--1..
RESOUITIOH II-..llli
DEVELOPIlEIlT ORDEIl or '1'IIB BOARD or
COUllTY COIIIIISSIOHERS or COLLIER COUllTY,
FLORIDA Fait Crl'YCATIl COIlHERCIl PIJUC
PUIIIIlED WIT DEVl:LOPMENT LOCATED IN
SECTION 35, ~WHSHIP 49 soUTH, RANCE 2&
EAST, COLLIEIl COUNTY, FLORI DA I
~, vinoa ond Aasociatss, Aq..nt, for citizen'. ,
louth..rn TrU.t Co~pany (Florida), National A..ociation oa
trust.e for Land Trust 153&0 Applicant, filod on April 15. 19.7
vith tho county ot Collior an Application for Oevolo,...nt
Approval (ADA) of 0 Development of Roqianal Impact (DRI) knovn
0&, citrqate co..arce Park plennod Unit Devolop.ant in
accordance with soction 380,0&(&). Florida statute., and
WHEREAS, Vin.. and As.oclat.. have obtained all n.c...arr
approval. and conditional approvals fro. the various collier
eounty aqoncio., dopart>>ant.. and board. roquired a. 0 condition
to Plannod Unit Develop.ent (PUD) zoninq and DRI approvol, and
1rHEP.EAS. tho Iloard of County Couinionero as the governing
body of the uninoorporato<t aroa of collior County havinq
juriadietion purau.nt to Ch.ptor 380,06 Florida statute., ia
authorized and e.powerod to consider Applicationa for
DoValopment Approval (ADA) tor ~volopment. of Roqionol Impactl
w
WHEREAS, the public notice raquir..m..nta of chapter 380
:,0; ...
-(~i":'"
".".(
'~":. "lo,.lde statutes and tho Colliar County :r;oninq ordinanoe have
:,!~ I>Hn aatl.,tied/ and
~,"".
P.. llIIEREAS, tho colli&r county planning c..-i.,don haa
reviewed and conaider..d the report and recomaendation of the
southwe.t Florida R..qion.l Planning council (svFRPC) .nd hold a
.publio hearinq an the ADA on Hov..ab..r 3. 1988, and
.;..' \llJEREAS, tho Iloard of County Comaiadonera haa paased
'~"Otd1nr.nce u-...u... \rI1icll rezanod th.. subjoct property to I'l1J:1i ..n<!
lOll 033 "'.[ 137
_.,._~---... .
WHEREAS, citygato Co~erce Park ADA ia alao part ot a~
overall ra&oni~9 application by tho dovaloper, and tho iaauance
ot a devolopaent order purauant to chaptor 380,06, FlorIda
ablute., doe. not conatituto a va! vsr of any paver. or r19hta
:t'lI9arding' tha b.uanca ot other develop"..nt pU'lIIit. by the
CclUrIty or stata, and
WHEREAS, on Dac..abar 13, 19.. tha Board ot county
eo.aia.ionora, at an open public hoarinq in accordance vith
Section 360.06, Florida Stat~ea, coneidorod tho application for
Davelop.ont of Regional Iapact subaittod by Vines and
Aaaociate., Agentl tho rlpor!: and roco..ondatione of tho
Southvest Florida Regional PlannIng council (SWFRPClI the
certified rocord of tho docuaentary and oral evidonco pra.ented
to tho Collier cOlmty PlaMinq COllIlllicaionl tho report and
roc08aendations of the Colli..r County Planning cOllIllliasionl the
r&C08aandotions of Collier County staft and Advieory Board., and
-the co....nt. upon tho rocord pdo "'fore thb Board of county
Oaeaiseionars at said .eoting. hareby aako. the tolleving
Findings of Fact. and Concluaiona ot Lav:
P'tNDTNCS 0,. ,J.CT'
I. Tha real proparty vhich i. the .ubject of the ADA i.
legolly described a. aot torth in the Plannod Unit
Davolopaont Docu.ont tor citygate Cosaarce Park
attached heroto aa Exhibit "A" and by r..terence aade a
part hereot,
2. :rile app"ticaUon ia in accordance vith section
360,06(6), Florida statute..
3. The applicant aub"itted to the county an ADA and
sufticiency rosponae. kn~ a. coapo.ita Exhibit S,
~nd by ret~r~nee ~de A part h~reof. to the ~~~nt
that thay are not incon.iatant vith the teraE and
conditione ot thi. Order,
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
~mber 9,2010
--,:>age 134 of 158
"
"k 033 rl'J 138'
-2-
~a Item NO.17C
November 9, 2010
Page 135 of 15$,
&!
~~t
.(.
~
-
-
4. The applicant propoe..s the developaent of cityqate
Cocaorce Park Planned Unit Davelopm..nt for 281.187
acrea Which include.: '0,000 squara foot of
co..orcial. 835,000 aquare feet of office, 1,'20,000
aquare f.et of Industrial, 250 hotol/aotel roo.., and
80,000 aquare feet of public, utilitarian,
recreational and educatiDnal .plce.
S, Tho Development ia conaistent with tho roport and
recoaaendation. or tho SWFRPC submitted pur.u~nt to
Su~aection 380,05 (12), Florida st.tutee,
6. Tho devolopment vill not unroaaonably intorfere vith
the achievo.ent or tho objectiv..a or the adoptod State
Comprahenaive Plan applicable to the area.
" A coaprohonaivo r..view of the impact q..neratod by the
dovelopaent haa boen conducted by tho appropriate
County dapartllont. and aqondoa and by the SWFRPC.
8, The dovolopment ia not in an oroa doaignated an Area
of critical state Concern pursuant to the proviaions
ot section 380.05, Florida StA~U~~.. .s a..nded.
" Tho devalopaent ia conaiatent vith the land
developaent regulatione of Collior County.
10. CON'SrSTF.NCY W1:TH THE rnC-J.L mMPRF.HEHSTW PUN!
Tho project ia locatod within the deaiqnated Urban
Area by the 1983, Collier county Comprehlnaive Plan.
The 231 acrae east or tho Florida Power' Light (FP'L)
aaaea&nt haa b..n amended (OrdInance Ba-~) to an
Induatrial Lend Uao Ocaiqnation. The area voat of the
FPlL ..a cement (37 acrea) i. deeiqnated aa Intercha09&
ccn:mcrclal.
roUCfnstoKs OF LAW
~
~
~
I
1C000, THEREFORE, Illl IT ~OLVED by the lIoard of County
Caaxlssionerc or colli..r County, Florida, in public .e.tinq,
duly conetituted and aece=bled Occeaber 13, 1988, that the
Cityqate Comm.rce rark Application tor Developmont Approval
aubaitted by Vinca and Aaseci.tea. Aqont, i. horeby ordered
-3-
.... .
, ,:approved eubj.ct to the tollowinq conditione eo ~.ccaa.nded by
'l.:lj
:~ the IWFRPC o~ in ~.aponse to th.i~ r.co...ndetion snd the
co.aitaonte speciti.d in the POD which ere h.~aby adopt.d 0&
condition. of Ipp~ovd of thia Devolopllent Orde~1
, b1lAIHACEIlIATn CUAL!,"!
a, '!'he. .co"tr<)l elevation fo~ the ov.~dl eurfAC. wahr
aanaq..ent eyete. ahall be ba.ed on the hleto~lcal
ave~aqe wet e.ason w.ter table of thi& sit..
b, Each ataq. of the two-ataqe su~tac. wat.r aan.qe.ent
.yate. ahall c>=ply with the South Florida Wate~
Kanaq..ont Diat~ict'a "Baeie of Raviaw".
c. Fo~ thoae ua.a that p~cduce haza~doue ..ta~iAle, the
applic.nt ahall p~'pa~e and aub.it.a Hazardou. '.
Hata~iale Hanaqaaent Plan to Colli.r County, Flo~ida
Depa~.nt of Environ=.ntal R.qulation (FDER), South
Flo~ida Wator Kanaq.=ant Dlat~ict (SFWKD), and Collier
county Dlvlsion of Eaervency Kanaqe..nt to~ r.vlew snd
approvol, prlor to any certiflcataa of occupancy baing
ieaued. .
d. Th. applicant ahall coordinat.wlth Colller County,
FOEll and the SFWKD in the davelopll.nt of a au~face
water aonitorinq aalntananOa and aaaplir4 proqraa to
help enaure achiava.ant of etate watar quality
atandarda. Aa apecified in Chaptar 17-3, F,A,C,
.. All co_it=enta .ade by the applicant. within the ADA
and .ubs.quent SUfficl.ncy docUM.nt., not in conflict
with the above ~.co..endation., shall be Incorporated
as condltiona fo~ approv.l.
2. nnmcYt
Th. propoa.d project wl1l ha an all el.ctrlc proj.ct and
"ill lnc~e..e the .nervY daaand in tho RAfllon. Th.
.pplicant hac c....~tt.d in the ADA to variety of
cons.rvotlon ..a.ur.. to holp reduce the .nervy lapact of
the p~oj.ct. Thes. a.asures ahall be adhar.d to by the
applicant.
.3. TRAHSPORTATI~
e. The applicant or hia succ...or sh.ll be fully
~.sponelble to~ ait'-~al.tad roadway and int.~aection
i.p~ove..nta ~equired within tho Cityvat. Co..erc.
Park DRI. '!'he applicant shall be rltquirlocl to pay tho e
full coat fo~ any ait.-r.latad intersection ~
i.prove..nts (lncludlnq but not li=lt.d to w
alqnali.ation, turn lan.a, and additional throuqh ~
lan.s.) found to be.n.c..a.ory by Colli..r County for the
project's acc.aa int.~..ctione onto CR-95l And
Landfill Road throuqhout all phaa.e of the
d..velopa..nt. Colli..r County one! the applicant, shall ~
li.it the "umb.r of acc..e roade fro. Cityqate to =
CR-9S1 in ord.r to pr...rve capacity on CR-iSl, a
reglonal ~oadway,
b. M.quat. cOIlllllHunta shall b. provid.d by the
applicant for the naces.ary tranaportation
iIOprov...nte, Includlnq d.alq" and a"q1naerinq,
utility relocation, ~iqht-of-way acquiaitlon,
conetruct!on, con~truct!on'contr&ct. adainietration,
. ""--.-
'.
.-
and construction in.poction nocaalary to .sintain p..k
..ason/p..k hour LOS "C" tor the tollovin~
ai~niticantly iapactad raqional roadway. throuqh
proj.ct buildout in 200Jt
CR-951 /T.1.. of ~A~~f R~.d\
Vand.rbilt Beach Road to cold.n Cat. Boul.vard
city<jate North Entrance to 1-75
1-75 to Davi. Boulovard
Davi. Boul.vard to CR-B64 (RAttl..nake H...ock
llead)
CR-R.S (Tmmok.lee Road\
_ Airpcrt-Pullinq Itoad to 1-75
~-A9S ,pine Rfdo~ ~oad\
_ Airpcrt-Pullinq RolU1 to 1-75
SR-IA IDAVI. Bout.vBrdl
_ Alrpcrt-Pul1inq Road to County Barn Road
- Radio Road to CR.-951
c. Ad.qu.to cOllllit"..nto .hall bo provid.d by the
.pplic.nt tor tho n.ca...ry i.provo.ont., includinq
but not liait.d to, riqht-of-way, co.t of
.iqnalization, turn lan.a, and othor i.provoaonts
d....d n.ca...ry by colli.r county or the Florida
Dep.rta.nt of' Tr.n.portat!on (FOOT), aa appropriate,
to ..int.in leval at aorvic. "c" on a poak ..aaon/pe.k
hour baaia tor the follovinq aiqnif'icantly iapact.d
oft-ait. roqional intor.octlon. throuqh project
buildout:
CR.-95l et SR-U (Davia Boulavard)
CR.-'5l at Coldan Gate PorkWay
CIl-95l at 1-75 ra.pa
CIl-95l at Ilattl..nak. Ha..eek Road
CIl-'5l at Landtill Road (alao a aito entranc.'
SII-84 at Airpcrt-pullinq 1I0ad
SII-84 at RAdio 1I0ad
The ti.ing tor tho initiation of the iaprov...nta
outlinod in roco....ndationa "b" and "c" Above .hall be
sad. at the timo that a ro.d aoqaont i. tound to
axc.ad LOS -0" on a peak ..ason/peak hour'baai., or a
roed intersection 1. toun4 to exc.ed a peak hour leval
at aorvic. "C". Sorvice level dotaraination .hall be
..d. by colli.r County or FOOT. o. approprlat... To
d.taraina th.oxi.ting levala of aervice on rogional
taciliti.. And tho no.d tor i.prova.anta in a ti.aly
..nnar, tho applicant ahall aub.it an annual
.onitorinq r.port to Colli..r county, Hapl.a Ar.a
(Collior county) Metropolit.n planning orqanization
(MPO), tho colli..r county Tran&portat1on Dep.rt..nt,
rOOT, and tho southwost Florida Ilo~ional Planninq
council tor r..vi.w, Tho tir.t .onitorin~ roport ahall
bo aub.ittod one yur attar the iaauanco ot the
dev..lop.ont ordar for Cityqote ORI. Report. .hall b.
lubaitted Annuolly until buildout of' the proj.ct, and
at a alnlaua, Ehall contain turninq aov.a..nt. and
traftic counta tak<<n at tho acc.la pointa to the
project, turnlnq aov.a..nta at .ach at the reqional
d.
'"( Q33rL'.lltl
-5-
,~.t..~:~"'~(~
. f......,
'.
~
-
~a Item No. 17C
--r:riivember 9, 2010
Page 138 of 15
int.r.octiona liat.d above in roco...n4ation "c", .n4
. c.lculation of the .kistin; lavol of a.rvice at
tho. 0 int.rsections and on tho road se;aont. in4ic.tod
above in it.. "b",
..
Th. loval. of servic. Ihall ... calculat.d accordin; to
curront profoaaional .tan4ard. .n4 .hou14 provide .n
in4icatlon of whon puk hour/p..k ..a.on LOS D 1&
akpact.d on i.pact.4 roadv.yo and/or p..k bour LOa "D"
on iapact.d inter.action., It vill prOVide up6atad
intoraation to .ore accur.toly foracaat pro'.ct
buildouttr.ftio an4 totel ttaffic for d.t.raination
of proportional abare.
Durin; each Pha.., prior to the approval of any lan4
u.. propoo.d in .ny .uba.quont future Pbaaa, the
applicant .hall sub.it for county, Ro;ional, and FOOT
reviov, an .valuation of the tran.portation lav.l of
.orv.ic. condition. in tb. .ra. .nd the anticipated
i.pacta of each ph... of city;at., If.tbb .valuation
in4icat.. that the aa....ption. onvbich the
Dev.lop.ont Ordar va. bo.a4 are b.i"; .kco.d.d and
that a aub.tantial deviatiDn ha4 cccurrad or vill
occur durin; any Pha.. . tull a.......nt of DRI
QUoetion 31 vill ... r.quired.
8o..d Dn the ataff tranaportatiDn a.......nt Df
ai;niticant projoct i.pact., conltruction of the
fDllowing tran.portatiDn i.provo.ent. ahall be n.ed.d
priDr tD, Dr coincidant with, davelop.ant Dt Citf9at.
co..orc. p.rk DRI (19.1-20Q3) it peak aooaDn/p.ak
hour LOS "D" conditiDn. are to b. .aint.in.d on
re;iDnal ro.d aa;aont. vitb p.ak hour loval ot ..rvic.
"D" in regiDnal inter.oction..
t.
'i...
"/0,.,. Jtagional Roadvay. and local rDodvay. (includin;
:'~" ,inters.ctionl interchall9a i.prov...nt.)
". 1~1..r.'
r ~"".tl. t 11981-19'0\
'i.h
'l~-'8t ,T.1.. D~ ~~ri ftQadi
~'~':
..,; -lltvi8 ISlvd. to C1t-I64
'j (llattlaanak. lIa_ock Road)
r'
\.",,"
".; Pblt.. II (1992-199"
w.' ., .., '
. - ,Iel. additional iaprov...nts .re indicatad,
~ '.~ .
,:~_.~i. Ir.t.. of cllcrl ~ol!ld)
~:.. .
11 l. -t-15 to Dav.h: Iloulevard
, ,
~tR-i' (D&vl~ Blvd.)
:f:i, .
, )~11rpcrt-Pullin9 RDa4 to
. ~.'" 'County Barn Road
..; ~ .
\k':"bdio Road to CR-951
It.:
I','
:. l~~ ~
Midon to four lan.. vith .
..d ian (se;a.nt 10 prD9raaaa<l
tor vidoning in FY ltt3-'.)
Kidan tD .ix lanoe with a
.edlan
Kiden to four 1~n.5 with 4
_..di4n
Kiden to tour 14n.. with a
.odian
me 00311",142
-l-
, .
-
t20D1...'DD~\
~-- (.," .
. ':"V.lldarbl1l: Beach Rd. to
,~. COlclan cat. Boulovard
':"k~il:Y9ata Korth Entranca to
~..:t-75
:>i';'~'"
, ,,:..;.!lav!& Blvd. to CR-IU
,,'l.:(lIatt:.1aanal<a Ha.....,k Roael)
..;~~,:
. ~~'~,'. t!t-8.l8 It_okftlee Rand)
" '
, '~)""'llrport-l'Ullinc;J Rd. to 1-75
~:.,.
,.~~'~...IO' ("in. RtdO'A ~o8d\
~'!f.' "
~"t ~.u.rport-l'Ulling Road to 1-75
.:~.~ ..
.....'..
.'t!R-U4
'",- ..
r&dnty Barn Road to CR-,n
::.:~'~' ':
.'.1
llotet
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
__ember 9,2010
Page 139 of 158
lIidan to aix Ian.. with a
...tian
aro indioat.d.
~.,~
.~:~~~
,~
.~
1
J
r
.s..
.~.
I~:r-
'.~
Wielon to feur lan.a with a
.adian
Wielan to six lan.. with a
.adian
wiel.n to aix lano. with a
....tian
widon to aix lan.a with a
.adian
Widan to four lan.s with a
aodian
The liatinq above asawao. that iapreve.ents roquired
in an earlior phaeo are provided in that phae..
Th. FDOT ahall be involvad in roviewin.; Laprov...nt
daaiqna and tho idantification of appropriate coat.
ror i.prev.aanta on the stat. Hiqhway Syat.. to b.
uaad in calculat1nq tho appl1cant'a proport1onat.
aharo. Theao costa ahall 1ncludo all aapocte of
roquired iaprov..onta including d.eiqn, utility
r.location. drainaqe, conatruction .nd othor r.lat.d
cost...
Prior to buildinq conatruction aouth of the plannod
.aat/w.at road abuttinq the County vat.r tr.ot.ent
plant and voat Dr tho Florida Powar 5 Liqht
trans.ission line .aa...nt. or no lator than , .onthe
rro. tho date ot approval ot thie Devo1op..nt Ordar I
FOOT ahall b. consultad in ord.r that a d.tar.inltion
can ... .ad. or the noc"uity to rae.rv. 1-75
int..rchanqa anlarqo.ont araa for riqht-of-vay .
Icqui.ition by utilization of Chaptar 337. Florida
at:lltut:.e.
1.
Ao to oach phase of dovllopc..nt and prior to
commancosant of each pha.. of davelopa..nt ..ither or
tha rollowinq condition. 5hall provide adoquate
UK 03:],1",143
-7-
q.
h,
-
-
c=-ait.enta tor i.prova...~ta indic.ted abov. to
.i9niticantly i.p.ctad rogional and local ro.dway. and
intersectiona'
(1)
It annu.l sonitoring raporta contira that tratfio
volu.e. on tho ro.d a.gaenta or intere.ctiona
ab~ a~c.ed LOS "0" paak .a..on/p..k hour and
the prot.ct is uti1i~ln9 sore than 5t of the
r.spect ve 1.ve1 ot aervice cap.city, th.n
building paraIt. for any future ph... ah.U not
b. qr.nt.d until tunding ot the n..ded
i.prov.sante tor th.t ph.ae ia committsd .nd
conatruction has coam..ncad. PUi1ding paroits for
the current ph... ah.ll b. "r.nt.d prov id.d the
lav.l at aervice at th. rcad aaqm.nta and
intoraections .bove do.a not 'Kc..d LOS EI or
The tr.nsportation ispactl to the ro.da and
int.r..ctiona .bove .h.ll be appropriat.IY
.ddr...ad con.i.tent with Southwe.t Florida
Reqion.l Planning Council pOlici.a and with the
sinisua .itiq.tiv. ....ur.a propoaod by the
Florid. Dopartaent of Cc=aunIty Atfairs in Rule
9J-2.0255, P1or!d8 AdmfnIK~r8t!v. code
'1'ron.portotlon pOlicy. 'l'he Re'lional Planning
council aholl b. con.ulted during tho colcul.tion
ot proportion.l .h.ra end/or pip.lining of
ro'lion.1 road i.prov..anta pursu.nt to tho DCA
rule, In the DCA rule formula, "trips .xlatlng"
shall b. d.tined to .ean all non-CRI trIps an the
roadway (or int.rsoctlon) e~istin'l ot the so..
ti.. aa the CRt trip. in the proportion.te share
calcul.tion. The r..ultant DCA proportionate
ah.ra formul. shall b. appliad to the total COlts
ot n.c....ry roadway and int.r..ction
11l1prO'Vu.nt. .
(21
4. vm~J.'I'IOK J.ttD nr..nr.TFE1WF-'MANDS!
a. Gold..n Polypodyrnna snd INttntly Orchids sh.U be
relocated to appropriate protacted ar..a on-ait..
b. 'l'he 2.47 .cr.. of watland. pre..rve .hown on the
approved KI.t.r Dova1opaant P1.n .hall be pr.a.rved.
Prior to i.suanc. of con.truction parait. for .n
.pprov.d d.volop.snt pha... ot the Cityq.ta pr01ect, 0
Red Cock.dad Woodpecker (RCW) .urvey utili:inq
pr.viou.ly .pproved ..thodoloqy will b. conduct.d to
in.ura that ReMa h.v. not eatabliah.d na.t caviti.. in
tho d.valop.ont ar.o. '1'11. .urv.y shall occur within
60 dsya of the atart at construction, .nd if it i.
d.t.rainad that RCW n..t c.viti.a have b..n
e.tabli.hed in the construction ar.., 4.t.raination
ehall be ..do by tho a'loneia. ra.ponaible tor ROW
protaction lawl aa to tho n.ca.sity at .edifying the
RCW Kanag..ont Plan,
d. Annual RCW o:urv.ys, utilizinq tho pnvioualy apprO'Ved
.ethodoloqy, vill be undertaken until 5 y.ar attar
final buil4-'out ef the cityqate pro1act, with recult.
et the aMulll RCW eurv.ya to b. r.,port04 to G..e ond
Fi.h Coacia.ion (GFCI, u.S, Fiah wildlife Service
(UBFKS), SWTRPC, &n4 collier county within 30 dayc ot
curvey coaplction.
c.
HIlt 033 pm 144
-8-
'.
,.' .--...".-....----..-
-
e.
Propoaala to .edlfy tho city~ate RCW Manaq..ent Plan
uy be .ubaitted at any U... sucb praponU ahal1 be
.upportod by a currant IUrvey of on-aU:. RCW n..Unq
and fora,inq patt.rn., and .uch addItIonal Inforaatlon
a. 1. requir.d to .valuat. the prapo..d KAnaqa..nt
Plan .edification, Upon d.t.raihatlon that the on
.It. coloni.a in any araa aooqht to b. r..ov.d tro.
RCW Pra.arv. Ar.a have b..n absndon.d, and any
raqulrod oft .It. .ltIqation i. b.ln, provid.d,
appropri.ta .edifIcation to tho RCW Hanoq...nt Plan
ahall be approvod.
M.lal.uc. and other .xotic v.q.tation within the RCW
pr...~ area .nd .l..wh.r. on th. city,at. .Ita will
be .radicatad, thua .iqnitlc.ntly anhanclnq the
qualIty ot RCW fora,a or.. on alt..
Exc.aalv. undarqrDVth vl11 ba controll.d by burninq
and~or by Ua. ot .achanlcal .qulpaant.
plna tr... havinq . DI...tar Br.a.t Halqht (DBHI ot l-
or .ora, locat.d out.id. th..RCW pr..arv. but wIthIn
the r.quIr.d yard .nd butf.r .rea. In the r...lndar ot
tha .Ita, vIll b. con..rved to provide .ddItIon.l RCK
foraq. .r.... Ea.t of the FP'L ..a...nt in the
vIcinity of the RCK pre..rY. .re. a. Id.ntlfi.d on the
H..t.r Pl.n tho .lnI.ua parc.l ai..a .r. to b. 2
acr.a, alnlaua yard. .re front so' rear SO' .ld. 25',
not .or. than 20t of th... r.qulr.d yorda .oy b.
d.votad to v.tlcul.r drlva. .nd p.rkinq .pac..' .t
l...t 30' of ..ch d.velop..nt eIt. .uat be d.vot.d to
nAtural .nd/or 1n.1:411.4 l.ndacap& area..
Land. wIthin tho ReM preserv. .rea aay b. util1ud tor
ll.ltod r.cr.ation.l purpo.ac cuch aa v.lkw.y.,
joqqinq tr.ila, picnIc f.oIlitI... .tc" ao lonq a.
dI.turb.nc. to native voqatatlon I. .Inlaal .nd the
r.cr.atlonal actlvltI.a .vold tho ReM n..t tr....
Dnd.rqrcund utIlltI.. and .urfac. dralnaq. .v.l.. cay
cro.. the RCW pr..arv. ar.a.
Th. pr...rv. .r.a .hall b.' poat.d vIth .I,na whIch
IndIcah that it 1. on RCW pr...rv. and that:
dI.turb.nc. Of tho blrda 10 prohlbIt.d .nd unlawful.
When a r.qlon.l aItlqatlon plan 1. approv.d and
Iapl..entad the applIcant'. plan .hall b.. .ubj.ct to
tho provI.ion. tharoof.
All oth.r co..It..nta _d. by th. ApplIcant elth.r in
th. Clt19at. ADA or suffIcI.ncy docuaant., not In
conflIct vith tho .bov. r.co...ndatIon., shall b.
Incorporated .. condItIon. tor d.v.lopaant ord.r
approval.
t.
,.
h.
1.
j.
k.
1.
1M( 033'1',(145
:'"
. "
-.-
.--~_._~.__._,.._.... .
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
~vember 9, 2010
_age 142 of 158
ttJ..~A'l"n KANACF.N'nI"flt
a. No c_orci..l, ...rvica it'D and/or Industrial
dav..lopa..nt shall ba allowad until a packaqo traat...nt
plant or c..ntral procesaing plant is on line to s.rve
the projact.
b. The applicant shall provida a..urance that. any
hazardoua vast..vater vill ba a.graqatod fro. ..voryday
va.tavater.
c. U parcol..tion ponda ..ro uaed, thoy oust. fully c""Ply
vith rDER .tand..rds.
"fU "PROTEe'rfOH't
It. Fir. sprinkler. ..hall bo includod throuqhout th..
projact .... roquirod by applicabl.. tire cod....
b. Tho projact ahall participate in lavtully adopted,
qanarally applicoble f..ir ah..ra requiraaant. to fund
tiro control diatrict f..cility; equipaant and
peraonnol nood. in ordor to .itigato projact i.pacta.
c. Tho ..pplicant .hall .eot vith appropriato fire
di.trict ropro.entativo. during .ite plan review in
ordor to incorporat.. any requir..d t..tures into tho
ovarall project dosign. '
BOLTD .MT~r
... Tho applicant and cubaoquont tenant. of the project
ahall inv.stiqata .atho4a ot reducing aolid vaate
voluaa.
b. Tho applicant and auba..quent tenant. ahall idontity
the proper on-aita handling ..nd to.porary storag.
procedure. tor ..ny haz..rdcua vacte that ..y bo
genoratad on-aita, in accordanco vith local. r~ional,
atato and fedaral hazardou. va.to proqra.o..
.. W'.I.'I"'l'R SUPPLV!
a, Th.. applicant ahall conaidar tha utilization ot
"x.riacopa" In th.. tinal landacope d.aign tor thia
projoct. Thia da.ign applicotion ahould h..lp to
turthar r..duc. irrig..tion raquira.ont. tor thia DRI.
b. Wator con...rvation .oaauro. and practic... ahall bo
utUbed in tha citygat.. COllllarc. Park proj..ct. At..
kini.u., vator con...rvstion devices ducribod in the
Wat..r Con..rvation Act (Chapt.r 553,14 ~Iorlda
statuto.) .uat b.. uaed, landscapo irrigation shall be
r..ctrictod t.o the hour. of 5 p,.. to , .,.., and
non-potable v..ter courco. .hould bo utiliz..d tor
irrigation vhoro pos.iblo.
'* 033t1r,IU6
-_._~._._- . .,-,~,-_._-~-_.__....
-
-
~ Item No. HC
~ember 9,2010
Page 143 of 1 ~
e~1L ~VRTOrR1~tnkRj
s. '1'he clevalopaant Ilhall aatillty the require.enta ot any
ordinllnoll, wllich .100 r.quire. ather clevdopaanl:a not
.ubjact to eIIapt... 310.01, FlorIda Statut.. praoeclure.
to particip.te, to contribute ita proportionate all.re
n..ded to .cco..odate tha i.pacta at the clev.lopaent/ .
0"
b, Pur.u.nt to Chapte.. 310.01(111, Floricla Statut.a, tile
applicant a.y be aubject to creclit tor eontributiona,
constructlon, sxpsnslon, or acqui.ltion at public
taclllti.a, it tile dav.lopar i. .100 .Ubjact by local
orelin.nce to iap.ct t.e. or exaction. to aeat the 00..
n..da. Tho local qov.rn..nt: ancl the d.Yeloper ..y
enter Into . capital contrlbution tront-andinq
agreement to ...iabur.e the dovolopor for voluntary
contrlbutions In 0"0... ol his lalr ahar.,
Co" Th..davelopaant ph.alng achadul. pr.santed wlthin the
AOA and .. .djuat.d to tho clate of d.velop.ant orel.r
approval wlth phaa. .neling. .edlfled .0 folloWll1
Phase I - 1994, Phea. II - 1997, Phlla. III - 2000,
Phaae IV - 2003, Phaaa V - 2001, .hall ba incorporat.d
a. a condition of epproval. If devalop.ont order
conditions and applicant comaitaant. incorporat.d
within tll. dev.lopa.nt orel.r to aitiqat. r.gion.l
lapacts, ar. not carri.d out aa indicotad to the
.xtant or in accordanc. with the tiainq aclladul.a
spaclfl.d wlthin tho clayelopa.nt ord... and thls
pha.inq ach.dul., than this .h.ll b. pr.auaed to ba a
aubatantiol deviation for the affected roqionol la.ua.
10. P.U,D, DOCUKENT,
Th. approv.d citygal:. PUD docua.nl: and Kaat.r Dev.lope.nt
Plan, aa those docu.anta ..y be offlcielly aodlti.d troa
ti.. to ti.a, are II....by incorpo..at'~ in anel aade 0 part: of
thi. Devalopaent Ord... anel are .ntitlocl ~ibit -A-,
attachocl har.to.
8l!: 1'1' FtIRTIIER RESOLVEO, by the Iloord, of County C....1s.ion.... ot
collier county thatl
1.
All oo..ll:&.nta and iap.ct aitiqatlnq aotlons provldad
by the applicant ln th. Application fO.. DaY.lopa.nt
Approval and aupple..ntal docaaenta and tho
Application tor Public Hesrinq for r..oninq and
auppla..ntal docu..nta that are not in conflict vlth
condltiona .or stipulationa sp.cifically .nuaaratad
abcy. .ra h.reby adcptad by till. DaYalopmant Ord.r by
ratarence.
2. Th. Dav.lopa.nt sarvica. Diractor ahall ba tha locol
otficlal ra.pon.ible for as.urin; coapl!anca with the
Develop..nt Ord.r.
~ 033ur,t147
-11-
'.'
'.
A9lilIiIIIa.1tem No. 17C
November 9, 2010 "
Page 144 of 15~.,it.
,
(,
"
.!
-
Thia Devalop.ant Order ahall r..ain in .ff.ct for the
duration ot the project. However, in the event that
ai9ftificant phyaical d.velopment has not ccaaenc.d
vlthin five (51 y.ars frea the elate ot find apprevo.1
of the Dev.lopm.nt ardor, d.volop.ant approval will
torainate and thia d.velopmont order ahall no loniar
be effoctiVe. For purpos.. Of thb r.quir..ont
-aiiftiticont phy.ieal dovelop..nt-do.. not inelud.
roads, draina,e or land.copin, but doe. include
construction Of build in,. or installation ot utilitie.
and faciliti.a auch a. aawor and watar linoa. Thia
tbep.ded nybeextend.d by thaBoard ot county
comaiaaion.ra upon raquaat by the Devalopor in tha
avont that uncontrollable eircumatancea delay the
e.....ne..ant Of davalopmant.
Purauant to Section 380.08 (1$1 (e)3, Florida statutea
(19.71, thi. proj.ct ia .X..pt trea down zoning or
int.natty or d.ndty r.duction for e paried of a.v.n
(71 yeara fro. the data Of adoption Of tha Developmant
Ordar, aubjeet to tho conditiona and limitationa ot
that soction of the Florida statutaa, provided that
phydcal davelopmont eOaJIoncea',\1ithin fiv. (51 yeara
aa providad in saction 3 h.reof.
Tha applicant or ita auccaaaor(.1 in title to the
aubject proporty ahall .ub.it a report annually,
comaancin, ana year from tho otfactive dot. of thia
d.vl1op.ont ord.r, to the Board of County
coaai..ion.ra of Collior County, the southw.at Florida
Regional Planning Council, and the Department Of
COaJIunitr Affaira. Thia raport ahall contain tha
inforaat on roquired in soction 9J-~,O~$(6), Florida
Adminiatrativa Ceda. Failura to aubmit the annual
report ahall be iovorned by subaaction380.08 (181,
Florida statut...
Suba.quent raquoata for davalop.ent paraita ahall not
raquira furthar roviaw pur.uant to saction 380.06,
Florida statute., unla.. it i. found by the Boord of
County Comaiaaionera of Colliar county, after due
notica and b.orin" that ana or .01'. of the tolleving
b praaent:
a. A aubatantial doviation frea tha teraa or
conditiona of thia developmant order, a
aubatantial doviation to tha project dovolopmant
phaaing ach.dula, or aubseantial doviation tro.
tha approvad develop.ont plana which create a
raaaonable likalihocd ot adverae raqional i.pacta
or othor raqion&l i.pacta which vora noe
avaluatod in tho raview by tha Southveat Florida
Ragional Planning Councillor
b. An oxpiration of tho poried of .ftectiveno.. ot
thia devolopmont order .a provided harein.
'* 033rl'ol14.8
.,
.' "
""I::'~t!,,:y:.
.' ~'
. ;,<i.
,,,:, .
..; .' ~.. .
,';" .
t"~, ..;',.
~.;.."7/'
_t"ll_
lIpon a Und.in9 that either of the above ia pr..enbcl,
the Board of county Cecaiaaionera ot Collier county'
ahall ord.r a ta~ n.tion ot all davelop.ant activ ty
until auch ti.a 0_ a n.w DRt APplication tor
DaY.lopaent Approval haa baen .u~ittad. ravi.wad and
approv.d in accordanca with s.ction 380.06, Florida
s~.tut:..ti
7.
Tha approval qrant.d by thl_ Davalopaant Ord.r i.
H.itad, such approval ahall not be con.truad to
obvll.ta tha d.uty of the applicant to co.ply with all
othar applicabla local, atata or talleral paraittln9
procedur...
8.
Tha d.flnitiona contained within Chaptar 380.06,
Florida statut.., .hall control tha int.rpratatlon and
construction of any t.rms of thi. Dav.lop..nt ardor.
Thia Ordar .hall ba binlling upon tha Dav.lopar, ita
&..19n... or aucc...ora in inter..t.
It ia undar.toed that any raferenca harain to any
govameantel aqaney ahall ba con.truad to .aan any
futura inatrua.ntality Which ..y b. cr.at.d. or
d..iqnat.d or aUcc.a.or in int.ra.t to, or Which
oth.rvi.a po....a.. any of tho pavara and. duti.. of
any rataronoad qov.rn..ntal ag.ney in .xi.t.nca on tha
.ffactiva dot. of thi. Ordor.
In tha av.nt that any portion or a.ction ot thi. Ordar
i. dat.rmined to be invalid. illaqal, Dr
uncon_tituUonal by . court Dr a;aney of co.p.tant
juri.diction, ouch daci_ion ahall in no .annar affact
tha roaainin; portiona of tbia ord..r which .ball
raaain in full fore. and. .tf.ct.
Thia r.aolution .ball b.co.a affactiva a_ provid.ad by
Law,
"
10.
11.
12.
c.rtifiad copiaa ot tbi. ord.r ara to ba _.nt
i..o4iataly to tho Depart.ant of Co..unlty Affaira,
and Southwa.t Florid.aReqional Planning council.
llOLY PASSED AND ADOPTED thie ..1l!J) day of December , 1988.,
o.>.TE. December 13: 1938 BOARD or COl1llTY COIlllISSIOIIERS
COLLI~COU~, FJPjlIJA
IlY:/t'..d-f/~
13.
'* 033w.tU9
; ~.
~'...:.'11'~..__
-l]-
. .....'''_.~..~~_.....---
-
-
Agenda Item No. 17C
-wPvember 9, 20
-=,age 146 of 1
"
Clark of Courta 1n And for tho
~: fwont10th 3uaicial Circuit, Colli..r County, Florida. do
\
. _. J, harooby cortHy thai tho toregoing 10 a truo copy at.
:)."~.'"
Ordinance No. 1.-'3 and
Dov..lop.ont Ordor 11-2/Rooolution 11~30'
khich waa adopted by the loord of County Comalaolonors on tho
13th day of Doc..bor, l'S8, during R.;ular So..ion.
kITKESS -V hand end the ofticial alal of tho loard of
county Coeeioaionor. of Colliar Counly. Florida, thla 20th
day of Doc..bar. 1"1.
3A1>1tS C. OIr-Ell
Cl.rk of Courts and Cl..rk
E~-off1cio to loord of
County co..~nora
~~~ . :3'7.::,: --"
3r: Hcur_an. I~nyon
Depu tj* CIerI:
, ..
... .-'U"1:1$ ,
....:........:." 0";... ',.
'", . .....
.--::.. ......
. ... .. .~.
_: '.. .
,- ... .
.::;.~, .... ..
.... . ."
'It ... .0.
~J' .... ....'0"
. OJI~Il':
. ,
lOOt: 033 /1'.1150
..-........--...-...--
.~-,-~,-- ,... ,_. ....'... --, ~.' .._- .,.
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 147 of 158
(
(
(
,;
I
~~ ---...~--
-~ ,
~~-"'..~'
':.-~~,~':.:' "",~.",:,~:,:
. . .' . .
e~a Item No. 17C
N vember 9,2010
age 148 of 158
I
,
" ~~..
~'~...,.- .
I
.
.
~
PUDA-PL2010-845 Rev: 1
CITYGATE COMMERCE CENTER
PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE
DATE: Snt10
DUE: 6nt10
I
. .
~ . f
. I f
i · I -
. I -,
i i
r._
_W
__r
~
"l""'f
'-
...
...
...
...
C"')
8
I
~ll{
""!NT
...
-
-
..
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 149 of 158
(
(
\
(
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 150 of 158
SIGN POSTING INS'\JtUCI'IONS
(Section 10.03.00. COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (IDC)
A :r,oning sigJ!{s) must be posted l>>' the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar
days in advance of the first public hearlns and said sign(s) must be maintained l>>' the petitioner or thc petitioner's agent through
the Board of County Cotntnlsslonets Hearing. Below are general guidelines for si&1ls. however these Suidellnes should not be
construed 10 supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requiremerrts, please refer 10 Section 10.03.00 of the
LDC.
1. The Bign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more tbanfive (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or
~
2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails. staples, or other means to a wood ftame or to a wood panel and then fBstened
. ..SeclJ1'elY1Oapoll\,or.otI!llI'structure, The sign may notbea1llxl\d to a tree or other foliage, .. . ..... ..... .... .. .. ... n
3. The petitioner or the pe~'s agent must maintain the sigJ!{s) in place. end readable condition untU the reqllested action
has been hea;d ilnd a fimiI decision rendered, If the sign(il) Is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the
petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s
NOTE: AFI'ERTHE SIGN llAS BEEN POSTED, TInS J\FlI'IDAvIT OF I'OSTl:NG NOTICE SHOULD BE
RETURNED NO I,.ATER TIiAN TEN (to) WORKING DAYS BEFORE nm FmST HEARING DATE TO THE
ASSIGNED Pl,ANNER. ...
.................. ....................... ...............-.............
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COWER
\ \.-
B.EFORE THE UNDBRSI<JNE~UTHORlTY. PERSONALLY APPEARED ,~n i- ru.+V\
- WHO ON OATH SAYS THA HIl HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTIO:N 10.03.00 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND BVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETmON NUMBER
. n- ~ 4- ItI'8L\ 3-
>L :'J63Qhra-P+-\{d #- 3't>1
STREET OR P.O. BOX
,}o"';h 'F(ul-\n
NAME (TYPED ORPRlNTED)
r~'.L0t;~ 'FL ,:j-lJoS
CI ,STATEZIP
L
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing ins!rlllnent was sworn to and subscn'bed before me this . I
JCJ::l-I t='rl ~ "personally known to me or who produced
end who did/did not take an oath. J! I rn II Xl \1 Q.;
"- IgnBl:nre~Pn: IC
&.~ MY~~8B4747 "VI
llI~Dvmiif~~."~.l r'
ted Name of Notary Public
day of ~ 20JSlQ, by
as identification
-- My Commission Expires:
,Stamp with serial number)
C;\Oo_1s and SettlngsldeselemkayILoCllI Settings\Temporll'Y Intemet FUeslContenl.OuUook\M581TC'-O\AFFIDAvrr AND StGN POSTING
INSTRUCTIONS 5,2,05.000
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 151 of 158
(
(
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Pa e 152 of 158
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 153 of 158
~}"
. ,,",,'
'/
"/.-'
(
(
(
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 154 of 158
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9. 2010
Page 155 of 158
(
(
(
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9,2010
Page 156 of 158
REFER TO THE DRI DEVELOPMENT
ORDER AMENDMENT PACKET FOR:
· APPROVED FLORIDA FISH &
WILDLIFE PERMIT;
· THE HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN FOR THE RED-COCKADED
WOODPECKER AND FLORIDA
PANTHER
Agenda Item No. 17C
November 9, 2010
Page 157 of 158
(
(
(
".
Agenda Item No. HC
November 9, 2010
Page 158 of 158
Naples DaDy'~e,W8 · Sunday, Octo_~~_~~_~~l~..:.Um
.r. O::;::-:~C:::~~'~~-;:..~:::=::::::=,=:~~=0:::===:.~__,_.,~::~:::.:~...:::;:::.-:':~-~"::::~'~
.
Legals
Legals
NOTICE OF,NTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby Qiven that on Tuesday, November 9, 2010, in the Boardroom. 3rd
Floor Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Ta.
mia~i Trail Naples. Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the
enactment-~t a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The
title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. BIl-93, THE CITY GATE COMMERCE
PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY DELETING SECTION VII CONTAINING THE
RED COCKADED WOODPECKER MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CONFLlcr
AND SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEcrlVE DATE.
Petition: PUDA.PL2010-B45, 850 NWN, llC. CG II. LLe & City Gate Development Inc..
represented by .Josh Fruth of Davidson Engineering, Inc., are requesting an amend-
ment to the.Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the City Gate Commerce Center
PUD. This wnendment seeks to amend Ordinance No. 88~93 to remove Section VII,
entitled fkd Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan, to recognize that said Man-
agemel'Jt Plan has been revised to conform to the City Gate liabltat Conservation
Plan ..nd the City Gate Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit. The PUD, consisting of
287" acres, is located at the intersection of Collier 80ulevard (CR 951) and City Gate
Bf\.JleVard in Section 35, Township 49 East, Range 26 South, Collier County, Florida.
Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are
available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the
County admmistrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. In-
dividual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an indi-
vidual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized
by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10
minut~ to .speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included In the Board agenda
packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective
public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven da~
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board Will
become a p~rmanent part of the record. .
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining. ther~to and ther~fore; may need to ensure ~hat a verbatim
record of the proceedings IS made, which record includes the testimony and evi.
dence upon which the appear is based.
I~ you a~e a J?i!rson wit~ a disability wh? needs any accommodation in order to par~
tJClpate In thIS proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of
certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Dep'art-
ment, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239)
252-8380. Assisted. listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the
County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk