Agenda 10/26/2010 Item # 8AAgenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 1 of 70
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code
of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance)
providing for the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the "Collier
County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update," dated September 30,
2010, and the "Collier County 2010 Fire/Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study —
Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts;" amending the Fire Impact
Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Five of Appendix A, in accordance with the findings of
the update study; amending the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee rate schedule,
which is Schedule Seven of Appendix A, as set forth in the update study, which provides for
a reduction in rates; providing for a delayed effective date of November 1, 2010, for the
amended Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee rates and a delayed effective date of
January 24, 2011, for the amended Fire Impact Fee rates, in accordance with the 90 -day
notice requirements of Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee
Act.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopts an Ordinance
implementing downward adjustments to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Impact Fee
rates, based on the findings of the "Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee
Study Update" and implementing downward adjustments to the residential and non - residential
Fire Impact Fee rates for Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District and a downward
adjustment to the residential Fire Impact Fee rate and an increase to the non - residential Fire
Impact Fee rate for the Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District, in accordance with the
findings of the "Collier County 2010 Fire/Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study - Ochopee
and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts."
CONSIDERATIONS: On February 28, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006 -09 and
Ordinance No. 2006 -10, providing for the adoption of the 2006 Emergency Medical Services
Impact Fee Update Study and the 2006 Fire /Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study.
On April 28, 2009, the Board adopted Ordinance 2009 -17, implementing a revised indexing
methodology and thereby establishing the current EMS Impact Fee rates and Fire Impact Fee
rates (Isles of Capri and Ochopee).
The requirement for the update of impact fees "at least every three years" is set forth by Section
74 -502 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code). In keeping with the formal
update requirement, the County retained Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. (the Consultant) to
complete the EMS and Fire Impact Fee update studies. The attached reports describe the
technical and legal framework and the methodology used to complete the reports. Additionally,
the update studies have been reviewed by the County's outside legal counsel, Nabors, Giblin &
Nickerson, P.A.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 2 of 70
The following is a brief overview of the major study components.
Emergency Medical Services: This update utilized the same approach and methodology used in
the 2006 update. The major study components are:
• Inventory of Facilities, Equipment and Vehicles
• Population
• Level of Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Calculated Fee Schedule
The Emergency Medical Services Impact Fees are decreasing, on average, 25% for residential
land uses and 32% for commercial/non- residential land uses. The rate schedule encompasses
over 60 individual land uses. The exact percentage of decrease varies because updated
information related to demand was combined with the decrease related to reductions in cost.
For example, the Nursing Home rate decreased 46% based on the cost decreases and updated
occupancy levels based on data from the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Collier County
profile.
Since the 2006 study, land and construction costs have declined significantly related to the
construction of Emergency Medical Services facilities, while the value of the vehicles and
equipment inventory has increased. This increase is based on 1) the purchase of additional
capital items since the last study and 2) an increased value of inventory items. This is consistent
with findings from reviews of other impact fees as well as research done in other jurisdictions
throughout the State.
As stated above, the results of the study provide an average decrease of 25% for residential land
uses and 32% for commercial/non- residential land uses.
The following are examples of decreases for common land uses:
Emergencv Medical CPrvicac
Land Use
Current Fee
Proposed Fee
Difference
Single — Family
$129.27
$95.91
($33.36)
1,500 — 2,499 sq. ft.
per dwelling unit
per dwelling unit
per dwelling unit
(living area)
Office
$157.58
$96.59
($60.99)
> 50,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail
$270.81
$166.65
($104.16)
> 50,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
_per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
Church
$53.78
$38.77
($15.01)
per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
General Lt. Industrial
$65.11
$46.93
($18.18)
per 1,000 q
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
per 1,000 sq. ft.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 3 of 70
Fire — Isles of Capri and Ochopee: This study also uses the same approach and methodology as
the 2006 update. The major study components are:
• Inventory of Capital Assets
• Service Area and Service Delivery
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Demand Component
• Calculated Fee Schedule
Consistent with the 2006 update, the impact fee calculation uses the value of capital assets
(vehicles and equipment) but does not include the land values or buildings. This decision was
predicated on no immediate plans to add future stations and no debt service on any existing
buildings. This does not impact the Districts' ability to utilize donations (land, stations, etc.)
should they become available in the future.
Similar to the EMS equipment inventory, each of the Fire District's equipment and vehicle
inventory value has increased due to the purchase of additional capital items and the increase in
value of inventory items.
As part of the service area and service delivery task, the fire /rescue incidents that the District(s)
respond to are reviewed. This information is then used to determine the distribution of calls
amongst land uses and the incidents per square foot, which is then used to calculate the revised
impact fees.
Related to Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District, the incidents per square foot for both
residential and non - residential land uses have decreased and have generated a decrease in impact
fees for both categories as follows:
Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District
Land Use
Current Fee
Proposed Fee
Difference
Residential
Commercial
$0.44 per sq. ft.
$1.15 per sq. ft.
$0.12 per sq. ft.
$0.90 per sq. ft.
($0.32)
($0.25)
Figures related to Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District provide for a decrease in the
incidents per square foot related to residential land uses and an increase in incidents per square
foot for the non - residential land uses. The primary reason for the increase is the distribution of
calls between residential and non - residential land uses due to improvements in data collection
since the last study. The revised impact fees for Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District are
as follows:
Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District
Land Use
Current Fee
Proposed Fee
Difference
Residential
Commercial
$0.75 per sq. ft.
1 $0.21 per sq. ft.
$0.60 per sq. ft.
$0.68 per N. ft.
$0.15
$0.47
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 4 of 70
On September 15, 2010, staff presented the Collier County 2010 Fire /Rescue Services Impact
Fee Update Study - Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts" and the
"Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update" and associated impact
fee rate changes to the Productivity Committee for their review and recommendations.
The Productivity Committee recommended that the Board accept the findings of the study and
associated impact fee rates and implement the full study results for both EMS and Fire Impact
Fees.
The "Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update" and the "Collier
County 2010 Fire /Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study - Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire
Control and Rescue Districts" and associated impact fee rate changes were presented to the
Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on October 6, 2010, for their review and
recommendations.
The DSAC recommended that the Board accept the findings of the study and implement the
proposed rates for both EMS and Fire Impact Fees.
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue projections related to the individual impact fees depend heavily
on the permitting trends during the corresponding time period. Changes in permitting activity
will directly affect this impact fee revenue stream. The specified reductions for EMS are
proposed to go into effect on November 1, 2010; therefore, any permits applied for on or after
that date will receive the lower rates. The statutory minimum 90 -day notice is not required for
impact fee reductions.
The specified rate changes to Fire Impact Fees are proposed to go into effect on January 24,
2011, based on the 90 -day notice requirements related to impact fee increases. Therefore, any
permits applied for on or after that date will be subject to the new rates.
Because of the decline in construction activity impact fee revenue has also been significantly
reduced. Based upon actual impact fee collections and current permitting activity and forecasts,
the following is the projected change in impact fee revenue associated to the updated rates,
assuming that development activity remains constant. Any further decline in activity will also
directly affect the impact fees collections.
Impact Fee Potential Change in Annual Collections
EMS Based on Current Activity
($46,992)
Fire Impact Fee revenue in FY 2010 did not exceed $2,000 between the two Fire Districts.
Therefore, loss of revenue is extremely limited due to limited growth and associated impact fee
collections.
Impact fees are reviewed at least every three years, with indexing calculations utilized in the
years between full studies; therefore, should development increase in these areas and constitute
concern related to increased/changing incident statistics, staff will advise the Board and seek
approval to update the study.
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 5 of 70
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The impact fee update requirements are consistent
with Objective 1.2 of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier County Growth
Management Plan (GMP), which states: "Future development will bear a proportionate cost of
facility improvements necessitated by growth."
Additionally, this approach is consistent -with Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the
Florida Impact Fee Act 2006, requiring the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee
calculations.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is legally sufficient for Board action. -JAK
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopts an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances providing for the
incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the "Collier County Emergency
Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update" and the "Collier County 2010 Fire /Rescue Services
Impact Fee Update Study — Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts;"
amending the Fire Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Five of Appendix A, in
accordance with the findings of the update study; amending the Emergency Medical Services
Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Seven of Appendix A, as set forth in the update
study, which provides for a reduction in rates; providing for a delayed effective date of
November 1, 2010, for the amended Emergency medical Services Impact Fee rates and a delayed
effective date of January 24, 2011, for the amended Fire Impact Fee rates, in accordance with the
90 -day notice requirements of Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact
Fee Act.
Prepared bv. Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager
Growth Management Division — Planning and Regulation
Attachments:
1) Proposed Ordinance Amendment; 2) EMS Study; 3) Fire Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 6 of 70
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number:
8A
Item Summary:
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of
Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) providing for
the incorporation by reference of the impact fee study entitled the Collier County Emergency
Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update, dated September 30, 2010, and the Collier
County 2010 Fire /Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study Ochopee and Isles of Capri
Fire Control and Rescue Districts; amending the Fire Impact Fee rate schedule, which is
Schedule Five of Appendix A, in accordance with the findings of the update study; amending
the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee rate schedule, which is Schedule Seven of
Appendix A, as set forth in the update study, which provides for a reduction in rates:
providing for a delayed effective date of November 1, 2010 for the amended Emergency
Medical Services Impact Fee rates and a delayed effective date of January 24, 2011 for the
amended Fire Impact Fee rates, in accordance with the 90 -day notice requirements of
Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act.
Meeting Date:
10/26/2010 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Amy Patterson
Manager - Impact Fees & EDC Date
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Business Management & Budget Office 1011812010 3:42:18 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Operations Analyst Date
Community Development &
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Environmental Services 10/18/2010 4:49 PM
Approved By
Dan E. Summers
Director of Emergency Services Date
Bureau of Emergency
Services and Emergency
Bureau of Emergency Services and
Management
Emergency Management 10/18/2010 5:06 PM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Director - Transportation Planning Date
Transportation Division
Transportation Planning 10/1912010 10:20 AM
Approved By
Jeff Page
Chief - Emergency Medical Services Date
Bureau of Emergency
Services
EMS Operations 10/19/2010 10:28 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney Date
10/19/2010 12:51 PM
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 7 of 70
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Administrator - Transportation
Date
Transportation Division
Transportation Administration
10/19/2010 12:52 PM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
10/19/2010 1:46 PM
Approved By
Susan Usher
Management/Budget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management &
Office of Management &Budget
10119/2010 4:35 PM
Budget
Approved By
Mark Isackson Management/Budget Analyst, Senior Date
Office of Management & 10119/2010 4:55 PM
Office of Management &Budget
Budget
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 8 of 70
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
(THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE
ORDINANCE) BY INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THE
"COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES IMPACT
FEE STUDY UPDATE" AND THE "COLLIER COUNTY 2010
FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY —
OCHOPEE AND ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE
DISTRICTS;" AMENDING THE FIRE IMPACT FEE RATE
SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE FIVE OF APPENDIX A, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINDINGS OF THE UPDATE STUDY;
AMENDING THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES IMPACT
FEE RATE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE SEVEN OF
APPENDIX A, AS SET FORTH IN UPDATE STUDY, WHICH
PROVIDES FOR A REDUCTION IN RATES; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION
IN THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES;
AND PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF
NOVEMBER 1, 2010, FOR THE AMENDED EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES IMPACT FEE RATES AND A DELAYED EFFECTIVE
DATE OF JANUARY 24, 2011, FOR THE AMENDED FIRE IMPACT
FEE RATES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 90 -DAY NOTICE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 163.31801, FLORIDA STATUTES,
WHICH IS THE FLORIDA IMPACT FEE ACT.
WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary
capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by growth in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth - related
capital improvements for various facilities since 1978; and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2001 -13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Laws and Ordinances (Code); and
WHERAS, on February 28, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2006 -09 and Ordinance No. 2006 -10, providing for the adoption of the 2006
Underline text is added; St F9"h text is deleted
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 9 of 70
Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Update Study and the 2006 Fire/Rescue Services --
Impact Fee Update Study; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
No. 2009 -17, amending the Code by implementing a revised indexing methodology and thereby
establishing the current Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee rates and Fire Impact rates
(Dependent Districts); and
WHEREAS, Section 74 -502 of the Code provides that impact fee studies should be
reviewed at least every three years; and
WHEREAS, Collier County retained Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc., to complete the
update studies; and
WHEREAS, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc., has prepared two impact fee studies
entitled the "Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Study Update," dated
September 30, 2010, and the "Collier County 2010 Fire/Rescue Services Impact Fee Update
Study — Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts," dated September 30,
2010; and
WHEREAS, the "Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Update
Study" recommends changes to the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee rate schedule, that
provide for rate reductions in all land use categories; and
WHEREAS, the average percentage of decrease for residential land uses is 25% and the
average percentage of decrease for commercial land uses is 32 %; and
WHEREAS, the "Collier County 2010 Fire/Rescue Services Impact Fee Update Study —
Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts" recommends changes to the Fire
Impact Fee rate schedule, that provide for rate reductions in both the "Residential" and Non -
Residential" land use categories for the Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District and a rate
reduction for the "Residential" land use category and a rate increase for the "Non- Residential"
land use category for the Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District; and
WHEREAS, the increase in the impact fee rates related to the "Non- Residential" land
use categories for Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District is primarily related to the change in
the distribution of calls between residential and non - residential land uses since the last study, due
to improvements to the data collection process; and
Underlined text is added; Stwslc- ► text is deleted
Page 2 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 10 of 70
WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the Fire Impact Fee rates and the Emergency
Medical Services Impact Fee rates equitably distribute the costs of acquiring public facilities
based upon a rational nexus relating costs incurred by fee payers to infrastructure impacts created
by residential and non - residential •land uses; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and findings and concurs
with the results of the calculations and the study; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopts this
Ordinance to implement the recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act,
requires that the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee calculations and these
studies comply with that requirement. Additionally, a minimum 90 -day notice shall be provided
before implementing an impact fee increase.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE. Article I, General, Section 74 -106, Adoption of impact fee studies, of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 74 -106. Adoption of impact fee studies.
The board hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the following studies with regard
to the respective public facilities:
(S) Emergency medical services: "Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact
Fee Study Update," prepared by Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. (3anuar-y -62896
September 30.2010);
Underlined text is added; Stnwk Wevo text is deleted
Page 3 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 11 of 70
(8) Fire facilities: "Collier County 24GS 2010 Fire/Rescue Services Impact Fee Update
Study — Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts," prepared by
Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. (januaFy 23, 2006 September 30, 2010);
SECTION TWO. Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances is hereby amended as set forth in the attachment to this Ordinance.
SECTION THREE. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions.
SECTION FOUR. INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. _
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-
lettered and internal cross - references amended throughout to accomplish such, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FIVE. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be considered adopted upon the date written below and subject to
filing with the Florida Department of State; however, for administrative purposes the effective
date of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Rate Schedule shall be delayed to
November 1, 2010, and the effective date of the Fire Impact Fee Rate Schedule shall be delayed
to January 24, 2011, in accordance with the notice requirements of Section 163.3180 1, Florida
Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act.
Underline text is added; SEprek� text is deleted
Page 4 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 12 of 70
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this day of , 2010.
ATTEST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
.0
, Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Underlined text is added; SLne1E threng text is deleted
Page 5 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 13 of 70
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE FIVE
FIRE IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective Je>ly - 27, 3009 January 24, 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Isles of Capri
Residential (4,000 sq. ft. max. per unit) SGA4 $0.12 Per sq. ft. under roof
Non - residential $0.90 Per sq. ft. under roof
Ochopee
Residential (4,000 sq. ft. max. per unit) $0.60 Per sq. ft. under roof
Non - residential W.24 $0.68 Per sq. ft. under roof
Underlined text is added; &ujwAk4hfeu0 text is deleted
Page 6 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 14 of 70
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE SEVEN
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective da1y-Z7T2009 November 1. 2010
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Residential
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. $1 -16:96 MAI Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. V29.2? 95.91 Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger $141.64 $106.11 Per Dwelling Unit
Assisted Living Facility SJ5.78 Per Dwelling Unit
Non - Residential
Auto Sales - Luxury
$300.9
$75.50
K - 4-,99A -et.- .
Per 1.000 sq. ft
Auto Sales - New/Used
$163.23 $116.31
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Drive -In
V95.32 $155.09
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Walk -In
&24"9 $174.&1
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Business Park
end 67.34
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Self- Service
$1-7833 S4149
Per Service Bay
Car Wash - Automated
109.5I
Per 1.0 0 sq. ft.
Church
$438 12aii
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
College —
�}
I=er- Stndet�t
eFSity
College/Univeat (Private)
$1
7.500 students or less
$6.80
Per Student
More than 7.500 students
$476
Per Stud ent
Convenience Store (24 hours)
$499 -98 $372.0 7
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store w /Gas Pumps
$418 -45 529189
Per Fuel Position
Furniture Store
16.32
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Day Care
$5 6� 3.40
Per Student
GasOhne/Service Station
$186:-82 $134.68
Per Fuel Position
General Light Industrial
$65.11 $4693
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Golf Course
$31438:45 1 322.1
Per 18 Holes
Home Improvement Store
$4696 $121.09
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital
ce 105.43
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel,44etei
$33-78 50.33
Per Room
Marina
V8.88 12.92
Per Berth
Underlined text is added; S9ae6- � text is deleted
Page 7 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 15 of 70
impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Mini - Warehouse
$6:39
$4.76 _
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel
$5,3.78
546.93
Pet Room
Movie Theater
$814
$406.76
Per Screen
Nursing Home
$90,59
EEM
Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less
$�57 58
96.59
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001- 100,000 sq. ft.
$i2i.72
8S 2.30
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001- 200,000 sq. ft.
$183.88
70.6
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001 - 400,000 sq. ft.
$88-69
152M
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft.
$75.48
$54.42
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical
$463 -23
$116.99
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Pharmacy/Drug Store
$47-34
$131.28
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube
$189.44
xM
Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive -In
$825 -62
$612.86
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - High Turnover
$668 -98
ME
Per 44.AA04q-ft seat
Restaurant- Quality
$6384L9
14.96
Per 4;090 -9q-t 2=
Retail 50,000 sq. ft. or less
9279.8i
$166.65
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft.
$248 -13
$167.33
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001- 150,000 sq. ft.
$229.89
$153.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 sq. ft.
$268.31
$187.06
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001- 400,000 sq. ft.
$233 -89
$159.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001- 600,000 sq. ft.
$240.61
$165.97
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001 - 1,000,000 sq. ft.
$240.61
$164.61
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail >1,000,000 sq. ft.
Si97.2
1$ 42.16
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty
$1 41.54
$114.95
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
RV Park
$36.73
Per Site
School - Elementary (Private)
$3-6.7
$4.08
Per Student
School - Middle (Private)
$6:59
$4.76
Per Student
School - High School (Private)
$7 54
5.44_
Per Student
Supermarket
$194.54
$139.44
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store
$147.1
$91.15
Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; Stiuek-threu text is deleted
Page 8 of 8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 16 of 70
COLLIER COUNTY
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE
FINAL REPORT
a
Prepared By:
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Tampa, Florida
September 30, 2010
073066 -02.10
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 17 of 70
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Planning and Eng,lneei ing - -.
September 30, 2010
Ms. Amy Patterson
Impact Fee Manager
Collier County Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Dear Ms. Patterson:
Enclosed is the Final Technical Report for the Collier County Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee
Update Study. If you should have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me
or Nilgiin Kamp.
It has been our pleasure to have worked with the County staff on this important project.
Sincerely,
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Steven A. Tindale, P.E., AICP
President
1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106
1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106
195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 * Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 18 of 70
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Inventoryof Capital Assets ......................................................... ............................... 1
Service Area and Population ....................................................... ............................... 7
Evelof Service .......................................................................... ............................... 23
CostComponent .......................................................................... ............................... 24
CreditComponent ....................................................................... ............................... 25
NetImpact Cost .......................................................................... ............................... 26
Calculated Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Schedule . ............................... 27
AppendixA Supplemental Cost Data
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 19 of 70
Introduction
Emergency Medical Services 1✓MS�mpact f ees are used to fund the capital epansion
projects for emergency medical service related facilities, land, vehicles and capital
equipment required to support the additional emergency response demand created by new
growth. Collier County§ EMS Impact Fee wa s last updated in 2006 To comply with
the technical study update requirements of the impact fee ordinance and to ensure that the
EMS impact fee is calculated based on the most recent and local data, the County
retained TindaleOver &ssociates, In c. T fto conduct an update study. This
report presents results of the Collier County EMS Impact Fee Update Study and will
serve as the technical support document in updating the EMS impact fee ordinance.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the EMS impact
fee. These include:
• Inventory of Capital Assets
• Service Area and Population
• Evel of Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Calculated EMS Impact Fee Schedule
These elements and other related analyses are provided in the following paragraphs.
Inventory of Capital Assets
According to information provided by the Collier County Emergency Medical Services
C-CEMSPepartment, Collier County owns I I stations used to provide emergency
medical services. In addition, the County operates ten additional stations out of leased
buildings. For impact fee calculation purposes, only the owned facilities are included in
this study.
Table 1 shows a summary of the CCEMS building inventory included in the impact fee
calculations. As presented, the inventory includes a total of 2,000 square feet of
building space and 20 acres of land. Some of the buildings are located with other non-
EMS structures on a given parcel. To account for that, the total building square footage
on each parcel is reviewed to determine a ratio of acres per square foot of building for
each parcel. Then, the portion of the acreage associated with the EMS buildings included
TindaleDver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 1 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 20 of 70
in the inventory is calculated. This adjusted acreage figure results in a total of 20 acres
owned by the County that is being used for emergency medical service facilities.
An important part of the impact fee calculations involves determining the current value of
the capital assets. The last EMS station was built in 200ffor $38 per square foot. This
figure does not reflect recent decreases in construction costs. As such, the building value
was based on the recent construction cost estimates and bids obtained from other
jurisdictions for fire and EMS stations, insurance values of the eisting stations, and
discussions with architects. This analysis resulted in a cost estimate of $20 per square
foot for EMS stations. Further detail on this estimate is provided in Appendixk.
In addition to stations, the EMS building inventory includes a portion of the recently built
Emergency Services Center f-SC) The to tal construction cost of this specialied
building with high security features was approitnately $12 per square foot. However,
because the County is unlikely to build another facility with similar features, the value of
this building was also estimated at $20 per s quare foot, which represents the cost of
future construction for EMS facilities.
find value was determined based on:
• The market value of parcels where the current EMS stations are located, obtained
from the Collier County Property Appraiser database;
• Most recent land purchases for future EMS stations;
• Kant land sales and market values of a 11 vacant land in areas where future EMS
stations are planned to be built;and
• hnd use characteristics of the areas wh ere current EMS stations are located.
It is important to note that in general, EMS facilities need to be located at or close to
major intersections and primarily in commercial areas. The land value analysis
considered land use characteristics as well as other information and resulted in an average
land value of $6,000 per acre. AppendixA pr ovides more detailed information on the
land value analysis conducted.
Tindale(Dver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 2 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
T_
A�
`W
C
W
i�
i�
T
'a
N
.M.
O
y
ir4
69
V1
O
7
...
R
r
R
r
z
"
tb
y
G e. ■ v' `
N
O
�
�
O�
a
m
z
�
N
O
p
V
u
C
v
Z
m
c
o
=;
N
E
n
c
U
Z
3
c
ru
E
y
r
O
'O
M
N
r
Rt
�
•^
O
00
M
N
M
R
OD
O
C
O
d
�
M
p
N
L
m
m
�
r
M
r
ON
M
G
y
bD
7
�
`
N
U
n
M
7
OD
g
y
y
❑
C
C
ol
;o
O
'O
i
Lam'
—
°
CD
N
o
v
rn
a
�
N
O
N
b
O
lt
N
F-HT
T
I
I
I
I I
O
N
U a�
cqs
a
O�
41-
U
cz
t
W
M
A
U
O
O
� N
cC y
E-" V
N
.M.
O
V1
O
7
...
R
r
R
r
z
"
tb
y
p
V
u
C
v
E
n
c
U
Z
3
c
ru
E
y
'O
M
N
r
Rt
�
•^
O
M
N
M
R
O
C
p
d
ON
C
G
y
bD
7
�
`
U
n
y
y
❑
C
C
ol
;o
O
'O
i
Lam'
—
°
o
v
rn
a
lt
F
m
vi
ti
rn
w''
F
F
F
Z
Z
Z
8n
U a�
cqs
a
O�
41-
U
cz
t
W
M
A
U
O
O
� N
cC y
E-" V
0—
�2 U
to z
to
U t
N b CIO
a�
o a4 rA 3
o a o y W
> b o o W o 0 0
0 > o .0
rA
0
0 �
En
• U U
(5 O O
rn
° �O y'«j
U z O ai u It
0'3 o W �, W o 'O 0° En
O Q U Q, 0 N �° "C 11,
ct o 0 �° o -c ai 0 Q, o
° V) cd y y Q � Cd
LID co�
'C3 tz
o
En
U A cz a= te 'p Q f3 'C U °' a. o a
w o o o Z o .4 � v� -C a� L° � .a
va ao o w o° ��+ b 0 m �° ' p. 2 w °
U ca
0� .0 mo o= c c Q o a.) o �o y -C
0 cu
" U U >' tU.. ° 2 `� . 4 cCC � =s . >V U � a°i at o o O o cCC o
W O o O y �, as _u O 4 �r CO a� 4. rte+ c " ° ° '�
o +y 0 > o_ cd
V ai o au > � `� v °y' ' on o o a cz
i cu a`�i i i " `" W u Z v G� ai o O o a
v�Or) v)dddE- �s�. E- t� e o o O
Ln
F,ov, L� as aoi
•� ^ ^ Q0.1 O N M fA fB P� 00 O► - N M 0.
cv GIB t� �, f6k f6r A� od i.� �. .�. sy. mot. ,� ,d. �✓
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 23 of 70
It should be noted that because a portion of the buildings and land inventory is still being
paid through bond and commercial paper issues that are being paid back with impact fee
revenues, only the portion of the facility value that is already paid for is included in the
inventory. The remaining principal associated with EMS facilities is not included in the
total inventory value to ensure the new development will not be charged twice for the
same facility.
In addition to the facilities included in Table 1, the County also leases 23,000 square feet
of building space for ten additional stations. These leased facilities, which are not
included in the impact fee calculations but provide services to County residents, are
presented in Table 2.
Table 2
Leased EMS Stations�'1
Fac�hiy`
`,`J' ���ddress 4�' �ExQj
U P- H,
Total Sgaare
F 7
..,�V�i,
Station 1
83f8th Ave. S outh, Naples 34102
2,80
Station 6
280 San Marco Rd ., Marco Island 34145
2,60
Station 40
1441 Pine Ridge Rd., Naples 34109
2,60
Station 8
O li;ckner Ave., Everglades City 34139
2,90
Station 23
6Eollier B vd., Naples, 34114
2,60
Station 2
Tdi Ave. North, 34103
1,60
Station 43
182Mderbilt Dr., 34110
2,60
Station 8
JCa ri B vd., Naples 34113
2,60
Station 46
410 Pine Ridge Rd., 34109
2,60
Station 32
4819kve Maria B vd., Ave Maria, 34142
1,380
Total
23,160
).Source: Emergency Medical Services Department, Collier County
The County is planning to build four additional stations over the nekeight years. Table
3 provides a listing of these planned facilities based on the information provided in the
2009knnual Update and Inventory Report (kUIR)
TindaleOver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 5 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 24 of 70
Table 3
Future Planned EMS Stations(l)
Fiscal
f
Facility
rts "
Year
Statusf
fp
Location
�esCA 11011
Station 3
� z
g bgan Rd, WNaples 34119
Pro osed
20132014
Proposed
Station 411
1 640 &644 Performance Ai, Naples, 34110
Planned
Station 45
nod lettelmmokalee Road
20132018
Planned
Station 49
Heritage W Property
1 jjovu--- wxuuivai upume ana inventory xeport
In addition to the land and buildings inventory and the leased stations, the CCEMS also
has the necessary equipment and vehicles to perform its emergency medical services
duties. Table 4 summaries the equipment and vehicle inventory. The CCEMS has a
total of $3.3 million worth of equipment a nd response vehicles, which eKludes the
remaining principal of the commercial paper issued to fund four ambulances. Similar to
the building and land inventory, in the case of vehicles and equipment that were funded
through a commercial paper that is being paid back with impact fee revenues, the
remaining principal is subtracted from the total value of the vehicles and equipment not
to overcharge the new development.
Tindalelver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 6 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 25 of 70
Table 4
Equipment Inventory
{1 Descr�pt,on
Umts t�)
,-
Unit Cost
Tota# 5
Replacement Cost
EMS E uipment
Portable Radios
6
$,60
$48,400
kptops
24
$D00
$20,000
Mobile Radios
8
5,60
$41,000
UHF Ambulance Radio
40
$,800
$12,000
0 1 Monitors for AR Engine Program
19
$�)00
$8000
Reek Decontamination Machine
1
$2,184
52,184
EMS Share of BS Mobile Command hbicle
1
$0,000
$0,000
Air Compressor
1
3986
9386
Sim H)y Training Mannequin
1
$0,403
$0,403
Oticom Emitters
49
$169
$0,315
Mini lte Rescue System
4
96
$3,$
Total Equipment Cost
$1,438,851
Vehicles
AS Ambulance
35
$5,800
5,813,000
Supervisory First Response bhicle F.Vedition)
3
$1,200
9,60
Supervisory First Response Micle lorer)
4
$1,200
$24,800
Supervisory First Response Micle Crown Mtoria)
5
$4,000
$20,000
Econo M
1
$3,000
$3,000
Hamat Trailer
1
W4
$ $94
Bat and Bat Trailer
1
$4,000
$4,000
Supervisory First Response bhicle Chevrolet C460)
1
6,60
16,60
Haulmark
1
930
930
Helicopter
1
$,000,000
$,000,000
Total Vehicle Cost
$12,356,934
Total Vehicle and Equipment Value
$13,795,785
Less: Portion Not Owned (4)
$481,005
Owned Vehicle and Equipment Value
$13,314,780
Number of Owned Stations (5)
11
Total Vehicle and Equipment Value per Station
$1,210,435
�) g)Source: Emergency Medical Services Department, Collier County
�) Number of units (tem 1)multiplied by unit cost (tem 2)
�) Source: Vice of Management and Bdget, Collier County
f Source: Table 1. For impact fee calculation purposes, the value of vehicles and equipment
is distributed over the owned stations only, and not all stations 4 total of 21)
Service Area and Population
Emergency medical services are provided by the CCEMS countywide. As such, the
service area for provision of emergency response services is the entire Collier County.
TindaleOver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 7 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 26 of 70
The EMS impact fee program requires the use of population data in calculating current
levels of service and performance standards. To accurately determine demand for EMS
and to be consistent with the population utilied in the County§ comprehensive planning
and AUIR process, this impact fee study considers not only the resident or permanent
population of the County, but also the number of seasonal residents and visitors as well.
Therefore, for purposes of this technical analysis, the peak seasonal population will be
used in all population estimates and projections, unless otherwise noted Peak seasonal
population projections used in the impact fee analysis reflect figures provided by Collier
County§ Comprehensive Planning Department and are calculated by increasing the
County§ annual permanent population by 20 percent.
Table 4)resents the population trends for Co Mier County. The projections indicate that
the population of Collier County is estimated to increase by more than 40 percent
between 2010 and 2029
Tindale0ver &Lssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 8 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 27 of 70
Table 5
Countywide Peak Seasonal Population
r h
4
b3 i
Peak Season',
s
2000
30951
2001
32519
�f'0
2002
341,9
519'0
2003
3919
JD4%
2004
34,384
4.23%
2005
38(9
3.28%
2006
311B10
2.4%
2007
400,027
0.4%
2008
3;$2
0.12%
2009
397
0.11%
2010
404,032
1.01%
2011
411,54
1.8%
2012
41915
1.8%
2013
42 (98
1.8%
2014
434,845
1.8%
2015
443,51
2.00%
2016
45,013
2.14%
2017
46,8
2.14%
2018
42,9
2.14%
2019
482,4
2.14%
2020
42,410
2.01%
2021
61,78
1.8%
2022
5 1,202
1.8%
2023
50,86
1.8%
2024
50,71
1.8%
2025
40,002
150
2026
48,76
1.6%
2027
1.6%
2028
1.6%
2029
72
1.6%
Source: Comprehensive Planning Department, Collier County
dine 11, 2010)
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 9 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 28 of 70
Apportionment of Demand by Residential Unit Tyne and Size
The residential land uses to be used for the EMS impact fee calculations include the
following:
• Single Family Detached
• MultiFamily
• Mobile HomeRVied Down)
Table (presents the number of residents pe r housing unit for the residential categories
identified above in Collier County. This analysis includes all housing units, both
occupied and vacant.
To address fairness and equity issues between land uses, as well as to address affordable
housing issues, the residential land use is tiered based on three categories of square
footage: less than 1,60 square feet, 1,80 to 2,49;quare feet, and greater than 2,60
square feet. To accommodate the tiering of impact fee assessments for the residential
land use category, an analysis was completed based on housing unit sie and persons per
housing unit, comparing nationwide averages to those of Collier County. This analysis
utilied national data from the 2007American Housing Survey (4HS)and data from the
2000 Census data for Collier County to exmine this relationship.
To calculate the tiering for the three different categories, national residents per unit ratios
for each housing unit category were applied to the total residents per housing unit ratio
for residential land use.
Table 6
Residents per Housing Unit
k' / � Vvv %-cusus, 1 d0lu R9J, aujustea ror peatc seasonal population, based on the ratio
of permanent to peak seasonal population �Oyo
g) Source: 2000 Census, Table H30
�) Ratios developed based on national persons per household data derived from the 2007
American Housing Survey
Tindaleaver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 10 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 29 of 70
Functional Population
pause the County§ EMS Department serves all residents, workers, and visitors,
population figures need to consider the portion of the time residents, visitors, and
employees spend in Collier County. Population is used as the basis of current and future
demand for certain facilities. In the case of EMS, the higher the nonresident daytime
population is, the greater the need for service relative to the resident population.
Moreover, it is not enough to simply add resident population to the number of employees,
since the servicedemand characteristics of employees can vary considerably by type of
industry. Using unweighted population and employment data to estimate facility needs
may result in substantial error.
Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space within a
community on a 24hoursperday, daysperw eek basis Nelson and Nicholas 1 Q)
A person living and working in the community will have a functional population
coefficient of 1.0. A person living in the community but working elsewhere may spend
only 1 diours per day in the community on w eekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends
for a functional population coefficient of 0.q 28hour presence divided by 18 hours
in one week) A person commuting into the community to work five days per week
would have a functional population coefficient of 0.30 phour pr esence divided by 16
hours in one week) Similarl y, a person traveling into the community to shop at stores,
perhaps averaging 8 hours per week, would have a functional population coefficient of
0.05
Functional population thus tries to capture the presence of all people within the
community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of
effective population needing to be served. Y1 estimating the functional and peak
seasonal population per unit of land use across all major land uses in a community, an
estimate of the demand for certain facilities and services can be calculated. The
following paragraphs eplain how functional population is calculated for residential and
nonresidential land uses.
Residential Functional Population
Developing the residential component of functional population is simpler than developing
the nonresidential component. It is generally estimated that people spend onehalf to
threefourths of their time at home and the re st of each 24hour day away from their place
of residence. In developing the residential component of Collier County functional
population, an analysis of the County§ population and employment characteristics was
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 11 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 30 of 70
conducted. lied on this analysis, it was estim ated that people, on average, spend l &
hours, or approirnately 6 percent, of each 24hour day at their place of residence and
the other 32 percent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables 'land 8.
Table 7
Collier County
Population and Employment Characteristics
stem /Caculat%on Ste
. F ure
takers who live and work in Collier County Qi
$20
ulcers who live in Collier County but work elsewhere
8,048
Total workers living in Collier County0
103,06
Collier County Census 2000 Population)
25,37
Total workers as a percent of population
41.0%
School age population f 7years)
3 (F2
School age population as a percent of population
14.%
Population net of workers and school age population)
111,802
Per population as a per cent of total population
44.5'0
q1 v-/ source: weau or i ransportati on Statistics, Census Transportation Planning
Package (7PP )2000 Part 3 figures for Bar 2000)
6) Sum of the workers who live and work in Collier County ( tem 1 )and workers who
live in Collier County but work elsewhere (tern 2)
4) (source: US Census beau, 2000 Census
(Total workers living in Collier County (tem 3)divided by total population (tem 4)
f School age population f tem divided by total population ( tem 4)
r�) Total population ( tem 4)less total workers living in Collier County (tem. 3)•and
school age population f tem f
PPopulation net of workers and school ag a population (tem 8)divided by total
population ( tem 4)
TindaleDver &associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 12 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 31 of 70
Table 8
Residential Coefficient for Functional Population
Population
Gr..oup`r
$ours at
Residence�l�.
Percent of
Popu}aton��.
Effective
takers
13..
41.0%
:9
Students
15
14.5'0
2.2
iMer
20
44.50
8.9
Total Hours at Residence4t
19
Residential Functional Population Coefficient (5)
68.3%
�) Estimated
�) Source: Table 7
�) Hours at residence (tem 1 )nultiplie d by percent of population (tem 2)
�) Sum of the effective hours
Sum of effective hours (tem 4 )divided by 24
The resulting percentage from Table 8 is used in the calculation of residential coefficient
for the 24hour functional population. These calculations are presented in Table 9
Nonresidential Functional Population
Given the varying characteristics of nonresidential land uses, developing estimates of
functional residents for nonresidential land uses is more complicated than developing
estimates of functional residents for residential land uses. Nelson and Nicholas originally
introduced a method for estimating functional resident population, now used widely.'
This method uses trip generation data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers'
(TE)Trip Generation Manual and T0§ Trip Characteristi cs Database, information on
passengers per vehicle, workers per vehicle, length of time spent at the land use, and
other variables. Specific calculations include:
Total oneway trips per employee (TE trips multiplied by 6 percent to avoid
double counting entering and exiting trips as two trips)
16tors per impact unit based on occ upants per vehicle (rips multiplied by
occupants per vehicle less employees)
• taker hours per week per impact unit such as nine worker hours per day
multiplied by five days in a work week)
' Arthur C. Nelson and Imes C. Nicholas, Estim ating Functional Population for Facility Planning,"
Journal of Urban Planning and Development 118q) 48 (8)
Tindaleflver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 13 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 32 of 70
Vitor hours per week per impact unit > visitors multiplied by number of hours per
day times relevant days in week such as five for offices and seven for retail
shopping)
Functional population coefficients per employee developed by estimating time
spent by employees and visitors at each land use.
Table qtlso shows the f unctional population coefficients for nonresidential
uses6ategories in Collier County. The f incti onal population coefficients in Table 9,vere
used to estimate the County§ functional population in Table 10.
I mdaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 14 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
d
i
0
^O
c
Q
°
a
C
v
LL
A�
^W^
W
M,
o Z
U �-
a� a�
o Y
U
iT
v�
r-i
v;
cz
U
O
O
O
� N
N
m E
'O �
O
O
C
>+
B a ar°
''-
+=
00000000
0
o
W
b) �
06 0
O
M o eo U
o• m a
r3, a '
a m � •� H
b N -p •O
G 4` _ .O
O N
Q
�' N
A
m E E v `m
r E
4° u
. E
>
-.m O.
00
QJ M
N
••♦�' C O Im 7 M O N v y O
o
c o
E. y m
>, ° :? � h v, � ','y •,�, ',,, a. E W a m a e
°
a
_..
°
6t
0 0
Et 6t
0
6t
0
Eta
0
6t
a
O y
O
6 y v y a id y °. 0 0 E E
e ° u mu °
c .Np
O
e m m e m e E u U s U G U
d G m C tme T •? F 2 °', H u N d
z
F
T •p C 2
y A
E
u
v ffi `v m
a° o aN m aww.°
m ad a o
5,
c
:.'. "
..
�
Y v°
y� d Y m 1� v u• � �.. � •� o w F v �• m R $ d .°'. a E
"�Qa Ec0 U ov U co .o>.E
o r eL � A
, y
ie ie ie
.:0. �•
C6
E
U
o °O °.� o�'oi+ o�y A �' R = c•O Es° °
n -�mooN °
9
is
a
a •o
O
y
-
,.
_
-
E- r�o0 Y'. oYOOS aac R. m o
_ o m m m E a a e a a a a o „�-,
d N d N d N N y U O m
� o � u oVV a uV a a c d m
O. Y» O
C d
O
ie F
A
o
N
V
O d O O O O O O d a L C N y y O p a 0 0 0 0
o.000UUU c�•� ° o
':
'_ y
C•
F cOi
u
E
e�/
w d W w W w W W ._ L E O E O. E M N >,M P5 T'G. .0 C C
F [� F F F .�•, '�0 a ❑_- .R :- :R s �' x
O
.h0 E 6 F y
Y3� ^ d O N a N n '� ° rail
e°ZU�
-�
i
n
zUc n cvez
o Z
U �-
a� a�
o Y
U
iT
v�
r-i
v;
cz
U
O
O
O
� N
N
m E
'O �
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 34 of 70
Table 10
Functional Population — Year 2010
r
' F' s ,>
r
Golher Cou�y
1
E unCt10 1
� r Resident
Fuuut,onal
2010 Peak Season Population
404,032
0.63
22
Nordtesidential Population F-mployees and bkors)
Natural Resources
X120
0.39
3,46
Construction
14,840
0.27
4,022
Manufactu►vrg
3,810
0.20
1,029
Transportation, Wehoush& and Utilities
3,36
0.27
98
Wlesale Trade
4,40
0.27
1,230
Retail Trade
1490
1.34
2 (820
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate
30,8
0.24
8,21
Services
83,410
0.6
49
Government Services
1519
0.49
739
Total NonResidential Population by Category
100,28
2010 Total Functional Population (5)
376,682
Ratio of Functional Population to Residential Population
93.2%
q source: i ante for the 2010 population figure and Wds &oole for 2010 employment
data
�) Source: Table 9
l�) Functional population is calculated by multiplying Collier County 2010 baseline data (tem 1)
by the functional resident coefficient (tern 2)
�) The total nonresidential population by category is the sum of the employment and visitor
figures from the nine categories O.g., construction, manufacturing, etc.)
The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population gx)
and nonresidential functional population (00,28)
Table 11 presents the County§ annual f unctional population figures from 2000 through
2029based on the 2010 functional population figure from Table 10 and the annual
population growth rates from the population figures previously presented in Table 5
i maaietwer AAssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 16 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 35 of 70
Table 11
Collier County Functional Population
(2000 -2029)
'
:. Year ., r:
Coffer County Functional
PQ ' ulationPro'�``ctwns' ,
2000
288,8
2001
303,29
2002
31 906
2003
335D19
2004
349DO
2005
36,60
2006
3JB5
2007
32,9
2008
32,9
2009
32,9
2010
3M2
2011
383,839
2012
39,132
2013
39A
2014
40¢137
2015
414,26
2016
422,9
2017
431,841
2018
440,90
2019
46,19
2020
4912
2021
4$6
2022
4P96
2023
48$45
2024
4$6
2025
63,97
2026
52,05
2027
50,244
2028
38,8
2029
525
Source: Table 10 for the 2010 population tigure. trigures
for other years are based on the respective annual
growth rates peak population figures provided in
Table 5
Tindaleflver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 17 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 36 of 70
Functional Residents by Specific Land Use Category
Wn a wide range of land uses impact services , an estimate of that impact is needed for
each land use. This section presents functional population estimates by residential and
nonresidential land uses.
Residential and Transient Land Uses
As previously mentioned, the average number of persons per housing unit in Collier
County was calculated for the single family, multi family, and mobile homeRlied
down)land uses, based on information obtai ned from the 2000 Census. aides the
residential land uses, Table 12 also includes transient land uses such as hotels, motels,
nursing homes, and adult living facilities (4E) Secondary sources, such as the local
Convention and 19itors Breau C- nd th e Florida Department of Elderly Affairs,
are used to determine the occupancy rate for hotels, motels, and nursing homes land uses.
As mentioned before, different functional population coefficients must be developed for
each of the impact fee areas to be analyod. For residential and transient land uses, these
coefficients are displayed in Table 12.
Nonresidential Land Uses
A similar approach is used to estimate functional residents for nonresidential land uses.
Table 13 presents basic assumptions and calculations, such as trips per unit, trips per
employee, employees per impact unit, onew ay trips per impact unit, worker hours,
occupants per vehicle trip, visitors patrons, etc. )per impact unit, visitor hours per trip,
and days per week for nonresidential land uses. The final column in the tables shows the
estimated functional resident coefficients by land use. These coefficients by land use
create the demand component for the EMS impact fee program and will be used in the
calculation of the fee per unit for each land use category in the impact fee schedule.
TindaleOver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 18 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
V/
C
.4�
.N
`L
r
c�
N, moww,,
W W
W
c
N
m
V
V_
Q
U �
j w
N
cd
U
O
� O
O
� N
-b y
W O L
0
� O L
L
tz
O o 0
^
L
a.
...;
Cd
— OJ L L
G
M
M
� C�
O
O
O
C
iO � s •R � U
a
2
E .E 0 '?
L
d
C
"Ci 0.1
d
O
0o
O
IR y abi v a�
O m b0 =
A
A
O
O
00 �
it r�r
• V
y O L
O y L9
IZ O N w 6r
_a y .4 _ N
.X
w� o
L
O
N c� p C y •O M e=C L
,U:
jo
NO
O
s
CL,
cj
W
E
E
'+7
N
cd � LC •7'. _ � td
L)
y R U O L 7 C N +� tv N N
O T Ls m
g 'UO8
L
y CJ y a`i
G N
d
W
`�
y
d y U C21-8 O d
y
'L)
o r
y
U a
O
O O Y s U L y ^
L y
ca c..
E��'��
•�
�rqn
m
m
�
�
O
�
v'
� ^ .Uj 'O O e�0 O � � OG 'C p
d-
V_
Q
U �
j w
N
cd
U
O
� O
O
� N
-b y
wr
W
wN
W
N
J
.N
L
O
Z
N
AC
W
N
\Y
V
ILL
TJ
U
ow
U �
W
N
_O
U N
d �
7 �
H
O
n
T
O
h
O
N
O
0�0
000
N
". VIE
n
O
O
ry
O
C
O�
p
O
O
O
N
0
"O
r
O
C
C
G
O
o
O
OC
fV
OC
W
�
M
M
M
00
00
a0
00
00
01
M
C,
M
a
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
d
O�
C�
O�
P
O+
D\
a
a
O�
O•.
P
C,
0,
y
o
:a .m
-: "
N
M
p
O
N
lC
•�
r
�
O
O
n
�
Q
N
O
�
P
M
�+
a
6..'
Z
N
M
M
...
Y
N
®
N
O
d
N
J.•�
M
N
R9
P
®
1A
M
M
M
�
B1
0M0
00
O
a
all
M
C
C
C
y
p
�
r�ii
y
H
w
r�ii
u
O
O
O
O
pO
0
O
O
O
y
00
O
CO
H
C
U
�
�
N
s
w
G
O
�
O
d
d
'L- rn
0-
03
o
o
w
t
L
o
o
f
o
i=
an
._
_
v
g
c
o
YW
TJ
U
ow
U �
W
N
_O
U N
d �
7 �
H
N
^� •V/
i�
E
0
0
Z
M L-
r 4-
)
.ii
r
.N
W
V
LL
bal
�.
r10
U
to
%r
W
U
r--1
U
O
O_
� N
� y
b O
n
n
n
n
sa
n
^
S
m
N
C
o
C�
O
M
�i
B9
N
OO
J>0
Mi
O
M
N
A
�
0 v
N
OD
n
n
n
r
n
n
n
V.
M
nv
w
w
w
w
w
w
.a
ego
ago
m
w
a
w
w
16 F
O
�
3 ,m'
'
M
Y�
N
a0
Pi
?
—
N
—
N
v
M
n-
V'n`
R
Ai
N
N
�
Ow �
�j
:p O
N
0
0
N
07
0
N
�'•
�.
0
0
0
rj
JD
N�
M
rNn
M
O
0]
a
b
N
N
�D
Q
z
6
z
6
Z
Z
N
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
N
0PR0
Z
Z
Z
Z
z
Q
Z
Z
Z
F W
a
a�;
V
W
A
Jn
o
'Q
M
M
M
M
O
W
PI
O
m
h
O
y'a
N
M
O
N
lV
•C .r'1
oo
—
�
�
ONO
W
W
�
�
0�0
0�0
000
W
OMO
0®0
�
0�0
N
V
�y h7
00
OND
ONO
a
m
e
0
n
d
p
O
Q
V
V
v
>
D>
v
m
U
v
W
Q:
a,
-
L
E�
bal
�.
r10
U
to
%r
W
U
r--1
U
O
O_
� N
� y
b O
N
IdIA
Y,
J
C
00
vZ
M L
r� 0
A
LV
r 'a
A�
W
0
V
LL
L•
� a..
O co
U a.
ow
U �
a
W
N
N
O
CA
CA
U yy
u 9
C y
U
N
m
o a
O'er
Y'
'E
a p4
e
o
>eF.
D
N
in
`e F
O al
Z�,�?
o�
E
q�
M
L
M
N
w
AI
C
O
.O
N
s
L
a
M
00
65
n
m u
m
a o
U
� E
C
� C
i
w
o
= O H
c ya
c
u
►`l.
wy
� p .iO
ry n o.
O
O
O
U C T
F
W 9
O
�
•O .O
O 0O T y�
W � C
0
d
C O 0
a
O W 9 q
O ..".
W
= v
t OP `p c C iC p 0 0 R R O O
O
d
m
w Y
V Y W W tOr V tOr tOr
y
=
n
aA�
p
L �cc_+
RP
�c_p
u 'OC, v .a .0 R. o ° .�yOC 'G n 'L a .° .C' 'C a •G 'G
�
typ3,
s of CL
L•
� a..
O co
U a.
ow
U �
a
W
N
N
O
CA
CA
U yy
u 9
C y
U
N
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 41 of 70
Level of Service
For impact fee calculation purposes, the current level of service P)for impact fee
calculation purposes is calculated based on stations per weighted and functional resident,
as presented in Table 14.
It should be noted that two different calculations of the current Hlwere provided in the
table. & of these calculations includes only the stations owned by the County and is
used in the calculation of the impact fee. The other includes stations that are both owned
and leased, which better reflects the service County residents are receiving. However,
because impact fees need to be based on what the eisting population already paid for,
the Abased on stations owned by the County is used in the calculation of the impact
fee.
Table 14
Existing Level of Service
(per Weighted and Functional Resident)
�) Source: Comprehensive Planning Division, collier County ror peaK popuiativu auu 1 au- 1
for functional population
><) Source: Table 1. Includes only the stations owned by the County
�) Source: Tables 1 and 2. Includes owned and leased stations
�) Calculated based on all stations (tem 3)
Item i )divided by Item �)
f Item g)divided by Item )
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 23 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 42 of 70
Cost Component
The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of all capital items, including
buildings, land and equipment�ehicles. Table 1 fprovides a summary of all capital
costs, which amounts to approimately $.Million per station. The table also provides
the distribution of assets, which would be used for future indeing calculations, according
to the methodology described in the indeing reports adopted by the County.
Table 15
Total Capital Cost
V) Jvur(:e: 1 aDle 1
ir) Source: Table 1
�) Source: Table 4
�F) Sum of building, land, equipment and vehicle value items 1, 2, and 3)
Percent of each item in relation to the total cost per station item 4)
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Table I (presents the unit cost for the impact fee analysis. This unit cost was calculated
as the total capital cost of S.5nillion per station multiplied by the ED standard of
0.00002(tations per functional resident, which re sults in a cost per functional resident
of S.
Table 16
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Description. .
Cost
Total Cost per Stationo)
$ 4T,86
D6tationsFunctional Resident)
0.000029
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident (3)
$71.68
kL J avid ur: l able 10
�) Source: Table 14
�} Total cost per station item I)multiplied by B(tem 2)
I lndaletWer Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 24 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 43 of 70
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the EMS impact fee, a review of the capital
financing program for emergency medical services was completed. The purpose of this
review was to determine any nonimpact fee revenue sources generated by new
development that is being used for capital facility buildings, land, and equipment)
epansion of the emergency medical services program. Revenue credits would then
apply against the cost per resident so that new development is not charged twice for
capital revenue contributions.
Capital Expenditures Credit
An analysis of the historical and future EMS ependitures for the five year period from
200dhrough 2010 was completed. Bed on the information provided by the CCEMS,
main funding sources, other than impact fees, included general fund and grants.
Table 1 Aummaries capital ependitures for th e last five fiscal years. The capital
improvement credit per person was calculated using the average capital epansion
ependitures during the last five years. As presented in Table 17th e result is an annual
average epansion cost of 61.2Eper person.
A review of the 2009kUIR information on EMS facilities indicated that over the nek
five years the County will fund all additional EMS facilities with impact fees, through
loans from the General Fund that would be paid back from future impact fee revenues, or
other unidentified funding sources. However, to provide a conservative approach, a
credit is provided based on historical funding sources of capacity epansion projects.
Tindale0ver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 25 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 44 of 70
Table 17
Historical Capital Expenditures
(2006 —2010)
Capita)! Investment.,;;:.
:: Source
Total ('06 -'10 .
County GranWGeneral Fund
ihek Decontamination Machine Gounty
Grant
$2,184
Mobile Command Miele C
ounty Grant
50,000
Air Compressors
County Grant
$86
Sim ley Training Mannequin (,'ounty
Grant
$0,403
Pticom Emitters C,
ounty &D® Grants
$0,315
Mini ite Rescue System Gounty
Grant
$3,$
Rhino 30 GPS 2&Y Radio Cot,
my Grant
$?0
Powered Docking Stations
Assistance to Fire Fighters
Grant Eounty Grant
88,32
Ambulance
General Fund
$812
Total Capital Epansion Ependitures
$o 15
Annual Capital Epansion Ependitures
$E23
Average Functional Population 000130 10)
32,5
Annual Capital Epansion Ependitures per Person
&26
(�) Source: Emergency Medical Services Department, Collier County
g) Source: Table 11, average population from 2006010.
Net Impact Cost
Table 18 summaries the calculation of the ne t EMS impact cost per functional resident
which is the difference between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit. The
resulting net impact cost is 6 per functional resident.
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 26 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 45 of 70
Table 18
EMS Net Impact Cost
Calculation Step
s i r
Impact
�� Cosh
Revenue
Credits.
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Resident
Impact Credit
Average Annual Capital Improvement Credit
1$1.26
Ca italiation Rate
%
Ca italiation Period (n ears)
25
Capital Improvement Credit per Resident
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident �)
6.02
t) Source: Table 16
�) Source: Table 17
�) The present value of the average annual capital improvement credit per incident
using an interest rate of percent over a capitaliation period of 25years.
�4) Difference between the impact cost per resident (tem 1 )and the capital
improvement credit per resident (tern 3)
Calculated Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee Schedule
&ed on the analysis presented in this report, an emergency medical services impact fee
schedule was developed for residential and nonresidential land uses and is illustrated in
Table 19 In addition, the table presents the current fee and the percent difference
between the current and calculated fees. An eplanation of the effect of changes to the
demand component on the calculated fee is also provided in Table 19
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 27 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
`'
N
� LL
W
Q
E
V
U
~I�I�I I I of CI CIOI I IOI CI�I�I
yd?
O
7
y
c
�
�
„
w
'cc
M
0.Y
N
Iz
p
Vi
Q
cOO
p
C
s
U
•�
OZ.
n
N
v
p
C
�(-5
a
O
'O �
O v ptu
w
'
�
LS
�
�
y O
•�
r}i�
s to
m U
❑UC � �
U
bA
�
V� L'
❑
O
Ri
LV
w
Ci C
ig
a�
<
z
0
z
o
++
f1!
M
av
00
z
zbe
69
00
a
f
M
~I�I�I I I of CI CIOI I IOI CI�I�I
LIZ
IZ
U a
ow
U
w
00
N
U
«3
U
�o
� o
�C'n
yd?
O
7
c
�
�
„
w
�^
M
3
N
Iz
p
Vi
Q
cOO
p
C
s
OZ.
n
N
v
p
C
�(-5
LIZ
IZ
U a
ow
U
w
00
N
U
«3
U
�o
� o
�C'n
U
�
„
w
3
s
OZ.
n
v
ai
p
O
�(-5
LIZ
IZ
U a
ow
U
w
00
N
U
«3
U
�o
� o
�C'n
� V
dN
C
U.
O *�
v�
CD Q.
V— E
010
A 0
M
r
v
U
O O O O W
O O O O O O
--- - = M
C
m m CA
w
s
�
3
�
3
o
•u
0000�
L+ L
O
O
C
'fl O
O
O
O
YRS
m
O
N
U
6�
u
O
L
O
C
w
�
a�i
w
a�i Y
U
W
2
✓
U
•�
o
b
a
•iii
CSC
U
y
L
C
L
•
at
w
oD �
i
y
�
C
u
C�
�"
C
C
O U
W
p
Y
'O p
a�
bU
G•
14
fl
C
CZ
C
y
N
CL
.Y
'�,
Y
a•
E
C
m
U
T3
RS
-tz
Y
= O
'O
U
.'y
w
N
ai
CL
m
aG7'
o�
z
N
o
00
o
00
et
O
N
o
rn
oo
N
O
a6
WM9
Yi
b�
M
69
fi'9
V
D°
N
!R
69
FA
tC
ff3
00
to
O
O
64
y
bi
A9
0
O
N
as
69
O O O O W
O O O O O O
--- - = M
C
m m CA
OIh
O —+
-I`-
M
a� o
� o
V
U
�I�IOIOIOI ~)
c
w
s
�
3
�
3
o
•u
0000�
L+ L
O
O
C
'fl O
O
O
O
YRS
m
O
N
U
6�
u
O
O
C
•�
�
a�i
w
a�i Y
U
W
2
✓
U
OIh
O —+
-I`-
M
a� o
� o
V
U
�I�IOIOIOI ~)
c
-o
J -d
Jw
U
at
W
CT
N
cz
cz
U
0
O_
O
� N
N
co �
'p
�,
Ln
w
�
�
o
•u
0000�
L+ L
O
O
C
'fl O
O
O
O
YRS
m
O
N
U
6�
u
O
-o
J -d
Jw
U
at
W
CT
N
cz
cz
U
0
O_
O
� N
N
co �
'p
�,
Ln
d
N
V ,v
Q
r E
r
V
U
a
a�
0
Y
� o
C
ter+
'O p
a, a�
m w
06
ee
Ir
A r0'� V fr L r.i
a
a
o
�w
a� y
� w
� o
ai
Y
O cC y
E ou ... c� ❑
o .`
;. C�'C � - ++..
.r
O "O
. U
�'
�
\O �
N N
N
M
�
N
N
N
O
Pte•
M
O
h
M
OO
—
�
of
M
f11
f1J
C
6�
M
~ 000
00
w
O
099
69
099
1*
°�
n
'�?
00
O
6�9
04
et
pp
b9
64
(A
00
O
a�
L
~
V p "
GL
00
46
In
o
h0
C,
AR
N
cu
64
O
A
fr9
�p
'�
94
A 6
64
M
64
N
84
N
69
M
Esi
�
00
gg
c
o
cn
V
on
;. C�'C � - ++..
.r
O "O
. U
�'
�
\O �
N N
N
M
�
N
N
N
O
Pte•
M
O
h
M
OO
—
�
of
M
O
o 0
s
a�
L
..
GL
CL
46
In
o
cu
cu
p
O
oN
c
o
cn
V
on
O
G
0
0 0
0
0
O
OO
s.
m
V
O
�
O
N
O
d•
O
rD
>
O
^d
L
O
•�
�
n
—
�
�
0
cu
�
c
C=ci
U
�a
b
n
a.'
Ucd
ow
U
r�
VJ
W
O
M
V
H
vi
U
0
�o
� O
V
N �
W
w�
W
Cl)
C LL
V (�
Q.
r =
d "p
V
V
4 t3
O
L
�
Z
z
Z
O
p
O
Cg•s�
o0
67
4—
<
.44
w
ai
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
•
`i'd Q
0 O
x n
N
�
�y
V
.
1
00 Q
1--1 FY
co 0
y U
O
O
O
zz
U � �
U
O
O Y
�
� U �
y
b N
4ol
O
Z
O O
a�
U as >> U
mil'
�
Q7
\O
69
.Nti RS
ce
O
O U Crdo un
O
W 03
M
Qy b9 O
Vag
4
c+�
oo
N
m
d'
ON
>
D
64
C
Ln
CA
64
O
C®
69
i
u
bA
C
•CZ
a
C
'0
N
E
-d
O
N
V
c�
�
7
CO
��
03
Q
co
t
❑
c��
=wL3C7
on
�w
c8
qUp
A
pp
O
4) tin
iSl U`.
O
rn
O
Z
z
Z
O
p
O
Cg•s�
o0
67
4—
<
.44
w
ai
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
•
`i'd Q
0 O
e
w
N
�y
V
.
1
00 Q
1--1 FY
co 0
y U
O
O
zz
U � �
U
O Y
�
� U �
y
b N
4ol
cli
Z
O O
a�
U as >> U
mil'
�
Q7
\O
69
.Nti RS
ce
O
O U Crdo un
O
W 03
M
Qy b9 O
Vag
4
c+�
oo
N
m
d'
ON
>
D
64
C
Ln
CA
64
O
C®
69
N
IS
s: .0.i
O
rn
O
y
O
p
D¢
d
d
67
O
O
p
w
�
O
C
0
O
O
O
b
•
`i'd Q
0 O
e
w
N
�y
V
.
1
00 Q
1--1 FY
co 0
y U
O
O
U � �
U
O Y
�
� U �
y
b N
4ol
O b
� O
O O
a�
U as >> U
�
Q7
~
O ro
.Nti RS
ce
O
O U Crdo un
O
W 03
it N
�� z
CA
>
D
y
Ln
CA
cc
O
i
u
bA
C
•CZ
a
C
'0
N
E
-d
O
N
V
�.
cC
�
7
CO
��
03
Q
co
c��
=wL3C7
on
�w
c8
0
O -�
El
U a.
b
w
�
0
U
U
b
•
`i'd Q
0 O
N
�y
V
.
1
00 Q
1--1 FY
co 0
y U
U � �
U
O Y
�
� U �
b N
4ol
O b
� O
O O
a�
U as >> U
b O nz�
~
O ro
.Nti RS
ce
O
O U Crdo un
O
W 03
it N
�� z
CA
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 50 of 70
APPENDIX A
Supplemental Cost Data
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 51 of 70
Construction Cost Estimate
In determining the appropriate unit cost for building construction, the following analyses
were conducted:
• A review of cost associated with recently built EMS stations and other buildings
in Collier County;
• A review of cost associated with recently built or bid fireEMS stations in other
Florida jurisdictions;
• Collier County EMS station insurance values;and
• Discussions with architects regarding recent fluctuations in construction costs.
In Collier County, the last EMS station was built in 200ffor a total cost of $38 per
square foot. As such, construction cost associated with this station does not reflect the
recent decrease in building costs.
TR contacted several jurisdicti ons to obtain more recent cost information. The bids and
estimates received in 2010 ranged from $9 to $1 der square foot �zluding
f imiturefiture6quipment, site preparat ion cost, permits, fees and other similar
epenses) The following chart presents th e building construction cost trends based on
bids, estimates, and other information obtained during the previous impact fee studies
completed by TO. As presented, the varia tion in station costs is relatively minor,
especially since 2005
Figure A -1
Fire /EMS Station Construction Cost per Square Foot
(Excluding Collier County Data)
Source: (her Florida jurisdictions. It should be noted that although the figures in the chart
represent the building construction cost in general, there may be situations where site preparation
or other similar costs were included. The chart is included to provide a general understanding of
construction cost trends for fireEMS stations.
Tindale0ver Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -1 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 52 of 70
Discussion with architects suggested a building construction cost of $4:�er square foot,
ealuding furniturefiktrekquipment, site preparation cost, permits, fees and other
similar epenses. Addition of these costs w ould increase the total building cost to $10
per square foot.
In addition, the average insurance value of EMS stations in Collier County is $0 per
square foot, again ealuding furniturefiktrekquipment, site preparation cost, permits,
fees and other similar epenses. Addition of these costs would increase the total building
cost to approhnately $30 per square foot. It should be noted that insurance values are
considered to be a conservative estimate because insurance companies ealude the value
of the foundation and other more permanent parts of the structure since they would not
have to be rebuilt if the structure was damaged or lost.
Given this information, an average building value of $20 per square foot is used for the
current station value. Table Al provides a summary of information considered in
determining this figure. Given that the insurance reports and information from the
architects tend to provide more local information, the midpoint of these two estimates
was used, which provides a conservative figure compared to the eperience of other
jurisdictions.
Table A -1
Total Building Cost per Square Foot
(2010)
ql aource: %.omer t-ounty racinty Management
g) Source: Data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions
�) Source: Discussions with architects
�) Red on buildings constructed in Collier County over the past five years
$flilding cost per square foot multiplied by the appropriate percentage. For eample,
in the case of insurance reports, the site preparation cost per square foot is calculated by
multiplying the building cost of $6 per square f oot by 2�Vand other cost is calculated by
multiplying the building cost of $6 per square foot by 20%
TindaleWer &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -2 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 53 of 70
Land Value Estimate
In order to determine land value for future EMS station land purchases, the following
datainformation was evaluated:
• The market or just )value of parcels where current EMS stations are located
based on information provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser;
• Most recent land purchases for future EMS stations;
• Rant land sales and markequst values of all vacant land in areas where future
EMS stations will be built;and
• $nd use characteristics of the areas wh ere current EMS stations are located.
It should be noted that EMS stations typically are located in commercial areas. The
following table provides the land value of all stations when land was owned by the
County and also presents land use characteristics of the area where each station is located
based on data provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser and Collier County. As
presented, out of 12 sites, only three are in residential areas as opposed to sithat are in
commercial areas. The remaining three stations are in areas with unique characteristics,
such as the beach area, fairgrounds, etc. The average value of all land amounts to
approirnately $32,000 per acre, while the value of land in commercial areas averages
$10,000 per acre and the land value in re sidential areas is $1,000 per acre.
Table A -2
Land Value of Existing EMS Stations
Statloa Desihiption - .
LOCation „ - ' - :
Acres
Land Value :
pu Acre
Total Lend
Value
Land Use
Station 44
%hderbiIt atach Rd. Naples 34108
10,31
93
9
Near residentialbeach, net
to fire station
Station 0
41 Golden Gate Pkwv, Naples 34116
0.9
93B38
$8,433 Commer
ial
Station 30
112 South 1st Street, lmmokalee 34142
1.23
87140
$07182 Co
mercial
Station 21
11121 East Tamiami Trail, Naples 34113
0.09
$2 ,95
8$34 Commercial
Station 10
1491mmokalee Rd., Naples 34120
1.8
$5D00
9,80 Fairgrouni
sag land
Station 7
13th St. SyNa les 34117
.00
$8,000
SiD00 Residents
I
Station 24
211kirport Rd. North Naples 34105
0.0
20,000
2fl100 Commere
at
Station 9 4
Emergency Services Complex
Santa 8bara &d Naples 34112 1.89
Ogly Cultural Pkwy, Naples 34113
11.000
4.06
9,
3'B2 $9.24
0 Residential
Netto library, part of a
larger acreage, misuse
hhant ind for Station 3 B hi
an Bd Naples 34119 2.41
S
32 ®,80
Residential
'Aunt ltnd for Station 49 Her
tage 4, Property
1.0
93590 6A
DO Commercial
hbant ind for Station 411 16
0 &644 Performance Ity, Naples, 34110 0.5
32(90
$23,433
Commercial
Total / Weighted Average all parcels)
"Bo
$146,462
9,6A30
Total/ Wei kited Avera a commercial arcels
22
$313,560
$,8612
Total / Weighted Average residential parcels)
Bo
S30.3671
9,309
Average (all parcels)
$231.631
Average commercial parcels)$310,536
Average residential parcels)
$31,077
Source: Property Appraiser, Collier County Only the stathonsparceis where iana is uwncu by Ulu
County are included)
Tindale0ver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -3 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 54 of 70
Table A3 presents the most recent land purch ases were made for EMS stations. As
presented, the value per acre ranged from approirrlately $04,000 to $2,000, with an
average value of $9,000. The wide range in th e value of these two parcels is primarily
because of the land use characteristics of their location. We the first parcel with a
lower value is located in a residential area, the second is located in a commercial area.
The table also presents the current value of these two parcels as shown in the Property
Appraiser§ database. The current valu a ranges from 000 to $2 00 per acre, again
indicating the difference in the value of residential and commercial parcels.
Table A -3
Recent Land Purchases for EMS Stations
Property . " ,'
Date
Purchase ."
Price
Acreage
Cost per Acre"
.2 010 Just Yalae per
Am
9 bgan Rd., Naples, 34111 2
6
36,000 241
03,34
$2fD00
$432
1640 &644 Performance W, Naples 34110 20 (7
1,89
0.9
61,74
$2070
9%
2008
422,6
-2%
2009
$6,84
44.1%
Total /Weighted Avera a (all parcels)
$10,240
94,89
3.40
$272,029
$113,012
,Average
$392,724
$175,966
U%JUIIiG. Li111G16-1t y lvleuivai ourvices iiepartmem ana rroperty Appraiser, Collier County
The land value included in the previous impact fee study was $200 per acre. This
value was determined based on vacant land sales in 2004 and 2005 As presented in
Table A4, this value is adjusted based on changes to property values since 200-%s
published by the Collier County Property Appraiser, which results in a current estimated
value of $10,000.
Table A -4
Adjusted Land Values
q) /-uuaancl value reflects the average land value per
acre included in the 200EMS Impact Fee Report,
which was based primarily on 2005data.
g) Source: Property Appraiser, Collier County
rmdaletWer Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -4 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Property
Time Frame
"Land Valued)
Value
Chan e(2),
2005
$2fD00
2006
42133
30.81%
2007
$48,303
9%
2008
422,6
-2%
2009
$6,84
44.1%
2010
$10,240
14.6%
q) /-uuaancl value reflects the average land value per
acre included in the 200EMS Impact Fee Report,
which was based primarily on 2005data.
g) Source: Property Appraiser, Collier County
rmdaletWer Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -4 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 55 of 70
According to the information provided in the 2009knnual Update and Inventory Report
k1UIR) three of the planned or programmed EMS stations will be in the North Naples
area, and the forth one will be in the Golden Gate area. The County already owns the
land for three of the four stations. The forth parcel is epected to be located in the North
Naples area. To determine the value of land for future stations, a vacant land sales
analysis was conducted in these areas. However, because there were no commercial
parcel sales with 1 to 3 acres in 2010, and because future EMS stations are likely to be
located in commercial areas, the current value of all vacant commercial and residential
parcels was evaluated. Table A- summaries this information.
Table A -5
Commercial versus Residential Land Values
(1 to 3 acres)
Source: Property Appraiser, Collier County T
Table A(provides a summary of the analyses shown so far. As presented, residential
land values reviewed ranged from $ '000 pe r acre to $24,000 per ac re. The range of
land values was $44,000 to $y000 per acre for commercial land. Bed on these
figures, an average value of $0,000 per acre is used for land in residential areas, and
$6,000 per acre for parcels in commercial areas . Currently, the EMS station inventory
includes three stations in residential areas, and sbstations in commercial areas, which
equates to a ratio of 33 percent residential and q)ercent commercial. As presented in
Table A7applying these percen tages to the estimated land value in residential versus
commercial areas results in a combined land value of approilmately $6,000, which is
found to be a reasonable estimate for the impact fee calculation purposes.
TindaleOver &kssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -5 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 56 of 70
Table A -6
Summary of Land Value Analyses
Variable
Land Value er Acre"
Current land value of all EMS stations
$31,61
Current land value of EMS stations located in commercial areas
$10,56
Current land value of EMS stations located in residential areas
$1,07
Countywide residential land value
$0,25
Countywide commercial land value
$3,8
Average value based on most recent land purchases
$9,24
Averse just value of the most recent land purchases
$M
glue of land based on changes in land values since 2005
$10,240
Commercial land value in areas for future planned EMS stations
$44,000 to $9D00
Residential land value in areas for future planned EMS stations
$ ®00 to $24,000
Source: Tables A4 through A5
Table A -7
Weighted Land Value
(i) area on me alstrioution of current stations
�} Estimated based on the analyses summaried in Table A6
$) Distribution (tem 1)multiplied by land value per acre (tem 2 )for each land use
and added
TindaleOver &ssociates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 A -6 EMS Impact Fee Update Study
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 57 of 70
COLLIER COUNTY
2010 FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE
UPDATE STUDY
Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts
FINAL REPORT
}
Prepared for:
Collier County
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
P-11.""
September 30, 2010
07320.05
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 58 of 70
Tinda.le- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
�. Plwlning wid LnPneeiing
September 30, 2010
Ms. Amy Patterson
Impact Fee Manager
Collier County Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: Fire Impact Fee Update Study
Dear Ms. Patterson:
Enclosed is the Final Technical Report for the Collier County Fire Impact Fee Update Study. If you should
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me or Nilgun Kamp.
It has been our pleasure to have worked with the County and District staff on this important project.
Sincerely,
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Steven A. Tindale, P.E., AICP
President
1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 0 Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106
1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106
195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 59 of 70
COLLIER COUNTY `
FIRE /RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE
Table of Contents
TindaleOver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
i
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
1
Introduction.............................................................................
...............................
1
Inventory.............................................................................
...............................
3
Service Area and Service Delivery
............................................. ...............................
Costper Incident .......................................................................
............................... 4
5
Creditper Incident ......................................................................
...............................
7
NetImpact Cost ..........................................................................
...............................
7
DemandComponent ...................................................................
...............................
Calculated Impact Fee Schedule ................................................
............................... 8
TindaleOver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
i
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 60 of 70
COLLIER COUNTY
2010 FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY
I. INTRODUCTION
FireFescue impact fees are used to fund acqui sition and epansion of fireFescue service -
related capital assets required to address the additional firerescue service demand created
by new growth. The unincorporated Collier County is served by seven fire districts. O
these, five are independent and two are dependent Districts. The last update of the fire
impact fee was completed in 2005with adopt ion in 2006 Per the requirements of the
impact fee ordinance, the County retained TindaleOver &ssociates TAXo update
the impact fees for the dependent districts, including the 6hopee and Isles of Capri Fire
Control Districts.
This report summaries the 2010 Fire Servi ces Impact Fee Update Study and will serve
as the technical document in updating the impact fee ordinances for the two dependent
districts.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the fireFescue
impact fee. These include:
• Inventory of Eisting Capital Assets and Evel of Service
• Service Area and Service Delivery
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net FireRescue Impact Cost
• Demand Component
• Calculated FireRescue Impact Fees
These items are all discussed in subsequent sections of this document for each District.
INVENTORY
The Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District (CFCRD )owns one station, and the
Qiopee Fire Control and Rescue District pC RD )owns two stations. Consistent with
the methodology used in the previous technical study, and given that neither District has
Tindale0ver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
1
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 61 of 70
immediate plans to add future stations and do not have debt service on any eiisting
buildings, the impact fee will be based only on vehicle and equipment value. As
presented in Table 1, the ECRD owns $.'In illion worth of vehicles and equipment,
and the ICFCRD owns $.2 million worth of vehi cles and equipment. Table 1 presents a
detailed listing of these assets.
Table I
OFCRD and ICFCRD Inventory of Vehicles and Equipment("
�) Source: Ehopeelsles of Capri Fire Control &escue Distncts
g) hhicles are loaned to the County by the State.
Tindaleaver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
2
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Descry tion =
p
Units
Unit Cost
Replacement
-
Cost
Ochopee:
Pumper
1
$80,000
$80,000
Engine
2
$80,000
$'000
Tanker
1
$10,000
$10,000
E6 edition) 2
$1,000
$2,000
Rish Truck �)
2
$
$
Attack
1
$�D00
$�D00
Support
1
$4,000
$4,000
Bat
1 _
$1 "D00
$1 0o
Total Equipment - Ochopee
11
$1,666,000
Isles of Capri:
Engine
2
$10,000
$20,000
lksh Truck
1
$0,000
$0,000
Bat
1
$80,000
$80,000
Support Miele
1
$8,60
$8,90
Chief Miele
2—
00
$,200
Total Equipment- Isles of Capri
7
$1,182,700
�) Source: Ehopeelsles of Capri Fire Control &escue Distncts
g) hhicles are loaned to the County by the State.
Tindaleaver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
2
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 62 of 70
SERVICE AREA and SERVICE DELIVERY
As mentioned previously, the ICFCRD and DCRD are depende nt districts and part of
the Collier County Government. The primary service area for each district is the
geographic area within the district boundaries.
Table 2 provides a summary of firetescue in cidents the Districts responded to over the
past five years. As presented in the table, between 200 -and 200pthe average number of
incidents was 8 in the DCRD and 813 in th e ICFCRD. The overall decrease in the
number of calls during this period is due partially to economic conditions, which reduced
travel, especially on I�in the case of the DCRD. In the case of the ICFCRD, some of
the decrease in the incident volume is due to the change in the District§ response
protocol. In addition, the District eperienced fewer brush fires in more recent years.
Table 2
OFCRD and ICFCRD Fire/Rescue Incidents")
� 3
�
2
l) source: Nationai Tire incident Reporting System
It should be noted that during the 20OR rough 2009period, the ICFCRD responded to a
large number of calls from outside the district. To determine incidents originated within
the district, the number of incidents for which the District provided mutual aid and
automatic aid diet of aid rece ivedXs subtracted from the total number of calls. Table 3
shows this calculation.
Tindale0ver and Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
3
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 63 of 70
Table 3
ICFCRD Fire/Rescue Incidents
Originated within the District
�) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System
g) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System.
Represents mutual and automatic aid given net of aid
received.
�) Total incidents (tem 1)less net aid given (tern 2)
Represents incidents originated within the District.
For the impact fee study purposes, an appropriate measure of service delivery is calls per
station. ltween 200 -'and 200pthe DCRD handl ed an average of 331 calls per station
annually, while the ICFCRD handled an annual average of 813 calls per station, of
which, approimately 319)riginat ed within the District.
COST PER INCIDENT
Table 4 presents the value of vehicles per incident. This figure is approhnately $,60
for the DCRD and $,00 for the ICFCRD.
Table 4
Capital Cost per Incident
Cost Com orient . OFCRD ICFCRD
Total bhicle and Equipment flue Q) $,¢J00 $, 82,00
Number of Incidents 2002010 Average e) 8 319
Total Vehicle and Equipment Value per Incident(3) $2,5171 $3,708
Q) Source: Table 1
�) Source: Tables 2 and 3
i3) Total capital value (tem l )divided by the average number of incidents (tern 2)
TindaleDver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
4
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
6
382
2005
1,080
2006
1,026
65
401
2007
9
36
238
2008
67
442
245
2009
8
344
331
,Average
319
�) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System
g) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System.
Represents mutual and automatic aid given net of aid
received.
�) Total incidents (tem 1)less net aid given (tern 2)
Represents incidents originated within the District.
For the impact fee study purposes, an appropriate measure of service delivery is calls per
station. ltween 200 -'and 200pthe DCRD handl ed an average of 331 calls per station
annually, while the ICFCRD handled an annual average of 813 calls per station, of
which, approimately 319)riginat ed within the District.
COST PER INCIDENT
Table 4 presents the value of vehicles per incident. This figure is approhnately $,60
for the DCRD and $,00 for the ICFCRD.
Table 4
Capital Cost per Incident
Cost Com orient . OFCRD ICFCRD
Total bhicle and Equipment flue Q) $,¢J00 $, 82,00
Number of Incidents 2002010 Average e) 8 319
Total Vehicle and Equipment Value per Incident(3) $2,5171 $3,708
Q) Source: Table 1
�) Source: Tables 2 and 3
i3) Total capital value (tem l )divided by the average number of incidents (tern 2)
TindaleDver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
4
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 64 of 70
CREDIT PER INCIDENT
To avoid overcharging development for the fire rescue impact fee, a review of the capital
financing program for fire rescue services was completed. The purpose of this review
was to determine any nonimpact fee reve nues generated by new development that is
being used for the epansion of the type of capital facilities included in the inventory
(.e., vehicles and equipment) Revenue cred its are then applied against the cost per
incident so that new development is not charged twice for capital epansion ependitures.
Revenue Sources for Capital Expenditures
An analysis of the historical capital epansion ependitures and associated funding
sources for the five year period from FY00500do F -2002010 was completed for
the two districts. lied on the informa tion provided, the DCRD§ main sources for
capital ependitures are the Municipal Service Taing Unit MSTU).nd impact fees.
However, the MSTU was used only to purchase buildings while new vehicles were
purchased with impact fee revenues. In addition, according to the 2009kUIR, there are
no plans to use nonimpact fee funding sour ces for future vehicle and equipment
purchases. As such, no credit is necessary against the impact cost in the case of the
ECRD.
Qr the past five years, the ICFCRD rece ived and epended funds from the Department
of Homeland Security, FEMA Grant on vehicles. Although there are no programmed
nonimpact fee funding toward future vehicles and equipment, to calculate a conservative
impact fee, a credit is given based on the historical data.
Table summaries capital ependitures for th e last five fiscal years as well as the
calculation of the capital improvement credit per incident. The capital improvement
credit per incident was calculated using the average capital epansion ependitures
during the last five years. As presented in Table 5the result is an average annual
epansion ependiture of $fie r incident for the ICFCRD.
Tindale0ver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
5
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
h
i.�
a
W
�U
e�
H �
V
0
W
w
�1
ow
U
U
U
w
Q
w
N
U
d9
6R
id
C
Qq
c�
bOA
U!
�
w <-
b �
ti"
U
c
B
J o
U
LO
3 it
C O
Q)
L)
.�
O
c o
v� 0 0
.-.� «s
U H U
C
0 O
N CO
C/1 Q o >
,� N
U
� CA,
M
N'
O
�
µ�
N
O
d'OOI
0.
O
NI:
N
rc
N;
N'
o.
o:
N'
O
O
O
O
M
r4
*--m
O
a
O
�
wi
6
0
N
R
++
i
�
o
•L
4.
O
R
y
�
a
,
C
w
�
TS
'i.
1•nl
y
at
c°
-r
L
U
•L
°
w
�
W
on
C
C
C
ycz
bD
W
L
W
U
vs
i
ow
U
U
U
w
Q
w
U
id
C
c�
bOA
U!
�
a7 �
y >
b �
ti"
U
c
B
J o
U
LO
3 it
C O
Q)
L)
.�
O
c o
v� 0 0
.-.� «s
U H U
C
0 O
N CO
C/1 Q o >
,� N
U
� CA,
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 66 of 70
NET IMPACT COST
Table fsummariEs the calculation of the net fi re rescue impact cost per incident which
is the difference between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit. This results in
a net impact cost of $j'�er incident in the case of the DCRD and $,49per
incident for the ICFCRD.
Table 6
Net Impact Cost
V 3vurce: 1 dole '+
g) Source: Table -Tor the ICFCRD. No credit is given in the case of the DCRD.
�) Present value of average annual capital improve ment credit per incident using an interest
rate of %ver a capitaliation period of 25years.
4)Capital cost per incident (tern 1)less total revenue credit per incident (tem 3)
DEMAND COMPONENT
In determining the revised impact fee for each land use, it is necessary to determine
service delivery to residential versus nonFe sidential land uses. To do so, the number of
calls received from each type of land use was compared to the square footage of each
land use within the two districts. The square footage figures were obtained from the
Collier County Property Appraisers F '2010 Ta Roll database. Table 'resents the
distribution of calls and the incidents per square foot for residential and nonresidential
land uses.
Tindale0ver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
7
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Calculation Step
impact Bost
Revenue
Impact .
Revenue .
Credits
oSt U':rr
.
Credits
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Incident p)
$,i7
t,18.00
Impact Credit
Average Annual Capital Improvement Credit
S.00
$6;
Ca italiation Rate
So
So
Capitaliation Period fn years)
25
25
Capital Improvement Credit per Incident
®.00
$,209)8)
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Incident O
$,$7
$,49
V 3vurce: 1 dole '+
g) Source: Table -Tor the ICFCRD. No credit is given in the case of the DCRD.
�) Present value of average annual capital improve ment credit per incident using an interest
rate of %ver a capitaliation period of 25years.
4)Capital cost per incident (tern 1)less total revenue credit per incident (tem 3)
DEMAND COMPONENT
In determining the revised impact fee for each land use, it is necessary to determine
service delivery to residential versus nonFe sidential land uses. To do so, the number of
calls received from each type of land use was compared to the square footage of each
land use within the two districts. The square footage figures were obtained from the
Collier County Property Appraisers F '2010 Ta Roll database. Table 'resents the
distribution of calls and the incidents per square foot for residential and nonresidential
land uses.
Tindale0ver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
7
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 67 of 70
Table 7
Land Use Distribution of Incidents
�) Source: Collier County Property Appraisers Bice parcel database
�) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System
CALCULATED IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
&ed on the net impact cost and the distri bution of the calls among land uses, a revised
impact fee schedule is prepared. The revised fee is calculated by multiplying the number
of incidents per square foot by the net impact cost per incident for the two districts.
Table 8 presents the calculated impact fees for both districts.
Table 8
Calculated Impact Fee Schedule
Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts
Land Use -
Incidents Per
5quareFootlil
S�rverage
Znd dents der
`��-
Squatr� Feetl)
, `
stzl'"
r Inc>Iden
Square )Foot
Residential
ICFCRD�`;
OFCRD'
sf
`0 FCRli4
ICFCRD
20%
NonResidential
:.
$0.68
.ICFCRD,."
0.21
sf
Residential
1,TT27
3,118,86
410
239 0.00
4 0.00008
Nonresidential
92,19
133,5 23
180 0.00021
0.0006
�) Source: Collier County Property Appraisers Bice parcel database
�) Source: National Fire Incident Reporting System
CALCULATED IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
&ed on the net impact cost and the distri bution of the calls among land uses, a revised
impact fee schedule is prepared. The revised fee is calculated by multiplying the number
of incidents per square foot by the net impact cost per incident for the two districts.
Table 8 presents the calculated impact fees for both districts.
Table 8
Calculated Impact Fee Schedule
Ochopee and Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue Districts
Land Use -
Incidents Per
5quareFootlil
Calculated ,,
ImpactFeetZl
Unit
Existing
IIn Feet31
Uait
Percenf
Change(..
Ocho ee Fire Control and Rescue District
Residential
0.00024
$0.60
sf
9.9
ff
20%
NonResidential
0.00027
$0.68
sf
0.21
sf
224%
Net Impact Cost per Incident¢
$.57
Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District
Residential
0.000080
$0.12
sf
0.44
sf
3%
NonResidential
0.00060
$0.90
sf
$.15
sf
22%
Net Impact Cost per Incidents
$,49
rl) Source: Table 7
g) Incident per square foot (tem I)multiplied by net impact cost per incident (tern )D
$) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Schedule, effective February 14, 2010
(1) Difference between the current and calculated fee
Source: Table 6
As shown in Table 8, the calculated fee for residential uses in the CCRD is 0.0 per
square foot Or 90 per 1,000 square feet) and 19.6 per square foot Or 60 per 1,000
square feet)for nonresidentia l land uses. These figures represent a decrease for the
residential land uses and an increase for the nonresidential land uses. The primary
TindalelD✓er and Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
8
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 68 of 70
reason for the increase in the non - residential fee is the change in the distribution of calls
between residential and nonFesidential land uses since the last study.
In the case of the ICFCRD, the calculated fee is 8.12 per square foot Or $20 per 1,000
square feet)and 8.9 per square foot Or 80 per 1,000 square feet )for nonFesidential
land uses. These fees represent a decrease from the current fees.
Table 9presents a comparison of current and calculated fees for the ECRD and
ICFCRD to fire impact fee implemented by other fire districts within Collier County.
Table 9
Impact Fee Comparison(l)
Fire District ..
(l'er square foot) '
Residential
Non- residential
SURD (urrent)
8.5r
MB.21
DCRD (alculated)
ICFCRD Ourrent) g)
8.44
$.15
ICFCRD calculated)
8.12
8.9
4 Corkscrew
8.82
8,87
East Naples
822
8.26
Golden Gate
8.25
8.39
Immokalee
$.I]
8.32
North Naples
828
8.9
4) Source: Collier Countv
Imnact Fee Schedi le PffPnr;vP
February 14, 2010
�) Source: Table 8
It is recommended that the Districts continue to cap the fee for residential land uses.
&ed on data obtained from the American Housing Survey and National Personal
Transportation Survey, it is apparent that beyond a certain square footage, the number of
people in a residential unit begins to taper off. Although larger structures may be more
likely to catch on fire, their possibility of using fire services does not increase
proportionately. This square footage was determined based on a review of the data from
the sources indicated above, as well as discussions with County representatives. Mh
TindaleDver and Associates, Inc. Collier County
September 2010 Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
Page 69 of 70
this cap, the highest fee charged for a residential dwelling unit will be $,400 $.8 x
4,000 )in the DCRD and $80 in the ICFCRD $.12 x1,000)
A cap for nonFesidential land uses is not needed because as the sic of these uses
increases, the number of people at these uses 0.g., offices, malls , other retail, etc.)
continues to increase.
TindaleEDver and Associates, Inc.
September 2010
10
Collier County
Fire Rescue Services Impact Fee
Agenda Item No. 8A
October 26, 2010
1$D • Friday, October 15, 2010 • Naples Daily News Page 70 of 70
!fMINANICF DITITIMC M nDnINANCF aFTIT11!
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, in the Boardroom, :3rd
Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government .'Center, 3301 East `Ta-
miami Trail,, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the
enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting, will commence at 9:00 A.M. The
title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: ,.,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER, COUNTY CODE 'OP "%LAWS
AND ORDINANCES. (THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED; IMPACT FEE ORDI-
NANCE) BY INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THE- 'COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE' AND THE.'COLUER COUNTY.2010
FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY = OCHOPEE AND ISLES OF CAPRI
FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICTS;' AMENDING THE FIRE IMPACT FEE RATE
SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE FIVE OF APPENDIX A, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FINDINGS OF THE UPDATE STUDY; AMENDING THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERV-
ICES IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS SCHEDULE SEVEN OF APPENDIX A, AS
SET FORTH IN UPDATE STUDY, WHICH PROVIDES FOR: A REDUCTION IN RATES; •
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE
COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES;' AND PROVIDING FOR A. DE-
LAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2010; FOR THE 'AMENDED EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES IMPACT, FEE RATES AND A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANU-
ARY 24,, 2011, FOR THE. AMENDED FIRE IMPACT FEE RATES, -IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE 90-DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 163.31801, .FLORIDA STATUTES,
WHICH IS THE FLORIDA IMPACT FEE ACT.
Copies of the proposed. Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are
available for - inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard.`
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any. agenda item must register with the
County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The - selection of an in-
dividual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recog-
nized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted
10 minutes to speak on an Item:
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda''
packets must submit said material a minimum of .3 •weeks prior to the respective
public hearing. . In any case, written materials intended to be considered by.. the;
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the . Board
will become a permanent part of the record..
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record! of the
proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a;;verb'8tim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony -anij evi-
dence-upon which the appeal is based. w.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to par-
ticipate in this proceeding; you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of
certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Depart-
ment, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 341.12, (239)
252 - 8380.. Assisted .listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the
County Commissioners' Office. ,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)