Agenda 05/11/2010 Item #16B 2
Agenda Item No. 1682
May11,2010
Page 1 of6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to award a construction contract to M&J Construction Company of
Pinellas County Inc., for Bid No. 10-5454 - "Goodland Bridge (030184) Scour Remediation
Project (CR 92 over Marco Channel)", in the amount of $851,455.00. Project 66066
OBJECTIVE: To award a construction contract for Goodland Bridge (030184) Scour
Remediation Project to M&J Construction Co., in accordance with Bid No. 10-5454. This project
is the second phase in addressing the structural deficiencies of the Bridge as identified in the
FDOT biennial Bridge Inspection Report and the "Condition Assessment and Recommendation
Report," December 2007.
CONSIDERATIONS: The project was submitted for advertisement of bids on February 24,
2010. A non-mandatory pre-bid meeting was held on March 10, 2010. Bids were opened on
March 26, 2010. The scope of work identified in the bid was for providing scour
countermeasures at nine of the Bridge picrs. This consists of armoring the channel bed with
layers of marine mattress underwater and bank and shore protection at the north abutment.
Three (3) companies submitted bids and two were deemed nonresponsive for failure to meet the
required qualifications. The requirements for acceptance were provided in Exhibit I
(Supplemental Terms and Conditions), which stated that the awarded contractor must be FDOT
qualified in the appropriate area of work. The Special Provisions accompanying the bid package
also provided the minimum requirements for prospective contractors. Also, FDOT Rule 14-
22.003 (Contraetors-Highway-Qualifieation to Bid) provides the classification of work for which
the bidders must be qualified. Bridges are classified by their type of construction into major,
intermediate or minor categories. The Goodland Bridge (030184) is classified in one of the
Major Bridges types within Rule 14-22.003, which is a bridge of conventional construction
which spans a water opening of 1,000 feet or more. The bridge crosses Marco Channel which is
a tidal saltwater channel that connects the Marco River to Goodland Bay. The total length of the
bridge from end to end is 1,842 feet and has 22 spans with lengths over 70 to ] 16 feet.
M & J Construction Company submitted a base bid of $],051,]47.00 and a total bid of
$1,391,959.00 with alternates. The Engineer's Base Estimate is $736,938.00 and the Engineer's
Total Estimate is $1,021,378.00 with alternates.
Since M & J Construction was the only bid and was more than 15% above the Engineer's
Estimate contract negotiation began on Aplil 13, 2010 and concluded on April 20, 2010 when
agreement was reached on a negotiated base bid of $85],455.00 which is ]6% above the
Engineer's Estimate of$736,938.00.
Engineer's Estimate
Initial Bid M&J Construction
Final Revised Bid
Base Bid
$ 736,938.00
$ 1,051,147.00
$ 851,455.00
plus Alternates
$ 1,021,378.00
$ 1,391,959.00
excluded
Agenda Item No. 1662
May 11,2010
Page 2 of 6
The $199,692.00 reduction was achieved by reducing Mobilization $90,500.00 and by saving
$109,192.00 in utilizing an articulated block system in lieu of the polymeric marine mattress that
had been specified. The articulated block system was deemed equivalent by the Engineer of
Record and this system was more cost effective for the contractor to install. The alternates were
excluded from the final revised bid based on the findings of the Engineer of Record that the work
at three additional piers was not needed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Tota] funds in the amount of $851,455.00 are available in gas tax. The
source of funds is Gas Taxes.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the County
Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action--SRT.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Bridge Repair and Improvement is identified on
the 2008 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and is consistent with the Growth
Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid No. 10-5454 to
M&J Construction Co. for the Scour Remediation of the Goodland Bridge (030184) and
authorize the Board Chairman to execute a standard County Attorney approved contract.
Prepared By: Marlene Messam, Sr. Project Manager, TECM
Attachment: Bid Tab
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item No. 1682
May11.2010
Page 3 of 6
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
16B2
Recommendation to award a construction contract to M&J Construction Company of PinelJas
County Inc., for Bid No, 10-5454 Goodland Bridge (030184) Scour Remediation Project (CR
92 over Marco Channel), in the amount of $851 ,455. Project 66066,
5/11/2010 9:00:00 AM
Date
Prepared By
Marlene Messam
Transportation Division
Project Manager, Senior
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
4/8/20105:13:16 PM
Date
Approved By
Scott R. Teach
County Attorney
Deputy County Attorney
County Attorney
4/9/20103:34 PM
Date
Approved By
Najeh Ahmad
Transportation Division
Director - Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
4/13/20109:52 AM
Date
Approved By
Lisa T ay lor
Transportation Division
Management/Budget Analyst
Transportation Administration
4/13/20102:48 PM
Date
Approved By
Gary Putaansuu
Transportation Division
Project Manager. Principal
Transportation Engineering &
Construction Management
4/13/20103:54 PM
Date
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
4/16/20104:17 PM
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Date
Approved By
Transportation Division
Administrator ~ Transportation
Transportation Administration
4/27/20109:44 AM
Approved By
Rhonda Cummings
Administrative Services
Division
Contracts Specialist
Date
Purchasing & General Services
4/27/201011:26 AM
Brenda Brilhart
Date
Approved By
Purchasing Agent
Administrative Services
Division
Agenda Item No. 1682
May 11. 2010
Page 4 of 6
Purchasing & General Services
4/27/2010 1 ;44 PM
Director - Purchasing/General Services
Date
Approved By
Steve Carnell
Administrative Services
Division
Purchasing & General Services
4/28/2010 1;13 PM
Approved By
Administrative Assistant
Date
Natali Betancur
Transportation Division
Transportation Road Maintenance
4/28/20102;21 PM
Date
Approved By
OMS Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
4/29/20108:05 AM
Management/Budget Analyst. Senior
Date
Approved By
Susan Usher
Office of Management &
Budget
Office of Management & Budget
5/3/20105:59 PM
County Manager
Date
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
County Managers Office
County Managers Office
5/4/201010:50 AM
Agenda Item No. 1682
May 11, 2010
Page 5 of 6
Proj. Mgr.: Marlene Messam
ITB 10-5454
Goodland Bridge Scour Remediation Project
Notice: 1207
Bids Received: 3
Non-Responsive: 2
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QTY
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
BASE BID: PIERS 6 THROUGH 9 AND 12 THROUGH 13
1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 108,500.00 $ 108,500.00
2 Turbidltv Barrier (Floating) LF 5700 $ 10.20 $ 58,140.00
3 Turbidity Barrier (Staked) LF 110 $ 4.20 $ 462.00
4 Staked Silt Fence LF 88 $ 1.20 $ 105.60
5 Rubble Riprap (Bank and Shore Protection) TN 716 $ 117.60 $ 84.201.60
6 Rubble Riprap (Stone Fill) TN 164 $ 97,20 $ 15,940.80
7 Bedding Stone TN 248 $ 31.20 $ 22.617.60
*8A Articulating Block (CC35 POL VESTER CABLE) SV 3450 $ 149,50 $ 515.775.00
*8B Articulating Block (CC35 STAINLESS STEEL CABLE) SV 3450 $ 153,90 $ 530,955.00
*SC Articulating Block (CC45 POL VESTER CABLE) SV 3450 $ 162.75 $ 561,487.50
'8D Articulating Block (CC45 STAINLESS STEEL CABLE) SV 3450 $ 167.16 $ 576.702.00
*CONTRACT BASE BID TOTAL (PIERS 6 THROUGH 9 AND 12 THROUGH 13) WITH 8A
*CONTRACT BASE BID TOTAL (PIERS 6 THROUGH 9 AND 12 THROUGH 13) WITH 8B
*CONTRACT BASE BID TOTAL (PIERS 6 THROUGH 9 AND 12 THROUGH 13) WITH 8C
*CONTRACT BASE BID TOTAL (PIERS 6 THROUGH 9 AND 12 THROUGH 13) WITH 80
805,742.60
820.992.60
851,455.10
866.669.60
NO'"
aJ~_
",00
~N",
O"-:Q)
Z~ en
E iUd: ~
d!!2
ro
'0
C
OJ
'"
<( u
g;
~
~
~
u
g;
~
~
0
. <
0 ~
0-
C
i
:\1 u
~i g;
~
" 0 ~
~i
0;
'0 8
c
.
~
'"
~
~
z
o
~
~
~
0 0 8 . 0 0 0 8
0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5 'i a a !
0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0
~ :;; :Ii j;( a * ~ 0
&
8 0 0 0 ~ 0 8
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i a a *
0 0 0 0 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ * a
~
8 0 0 8
~. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ si *
8 0 ;;; ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~
~ 0 0 ~
~ ~ N .
~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ~
~ ~
0
0
~
0 I ~
0 ~
"' ~
0 '" '0
~ H ~
-a ! ! ~
~ ~ ~
~ N M . ~ w ~ 00
~
o
.
~
i
8 0 8 8 8 8
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
ct ;;; ~ i. r;:
0 8 8 8 0 0
~ ~ a ~ ~ a
ct ct
0 0 0 0 0 .
~ 0
~ ~ 00 ~
~ ct M a a i. ~
'"
0 8 0 8
~. ~ ~ ~ *
~ a
8 ,. 0 8 0
~ ~ ~
~ i. 8' a i. ~ a
;;:
~ ,.
~ ~ 0 ~
~ d ~
~ ~ N ~
~ ~
~ z ~ ~ z ~
~ ~
- ~ -
~ ~ ~
0 ~
0
~ ~ < ~
< ~
. i ~
! ~ !
~ ~
~ " ~ ~ :0: ~
~
...
~
~
~
d
"
~
~
!
~
"
~
~
~
~
;;.
<
~
o
"
~
b
~
z
8
8 8 8 "
~ ~ ~
ct ~ & !
8 8 8
~ ~ a
ct
0 0
8 ~ ~ IE
~ ct if sf g
8 8
8 ~ a
~
0 00 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
;;: ct 0 g ~
~
0
~ ~
d
N ~ !!if-
f-
~ z ~
~
I-
~ ~
<
~ ~
~ ~
<
~ 0 0
0
~ ~
~ 0 I
! ~
~
~ ~ ~
il. H H H
.1....
u
J "
< ~ 0
~ c
.~ j 1
I ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 t
~ j )j
'E 0
~ ~ ~ ~