Agenda 02/23/2010 Item #17A
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 1 of 199
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318: Pawel and Teryl Brzeski, Magnolia Pond Holdings, LLC and
Teryl Brzeski, Trustee ofthe Land Trust # I-B, represented by Davidson Engineering and
Patrick White of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP, are requesting a rezone from the
Magnolia Pond Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance No. 98-49, and Rural
Agriculture (A) Zoning Districts to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to be
known as Magnolia Pond MPUD, permitting 231 multi-family dwelling units and/or an
assisted living facility (ALF) at a floor area ratio of 0.60 with the applicant seeking to add
an additional 5 acres to the site. The subject property is 47.05:1: acres and is located on the
north side of the 1-75 right-of-way and half mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) in
Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and
ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure
that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The petitioner is proposing an amendment to the sunsetted Magnolia Pond PUD (approximately
42.05:1: acres) to remove the inconsistent language in the PUD and to add a 5-acre parcel at the
northeast comer of Magnolia Pond PUD. No increase in the density or already approved 231
dwelling units is proposed. The multi-residential use portion will permit a maximum density of
4.91 dwelling units per acre and a maximum of 231 dwelling units and/or an assisted living
facility (ALF) at a floor area ratio of 0.60, as well as a County pedestrianlbicycle trail. The
Magnolia Pond MPUD document provides for viable naturally functioning native vegetation on-
site shall be retained.
On September 21, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) heard and approved
Petition PUDEX-2004-AR-5897, known as Magnolia Pond PUD, which was extended to June 9,
2005 (Resolution No. 04-284). Subsequently the applicants went before the Board of Zoning
Appeals (BZA) on February 14, 2006 for a second PUD Extension. At the hearing the BZA
reviewed the PUD extension request and determined to deny the request to extend the current
PUD zoning because it did not meet the five year GMP consistency evaluation. The BZA
directed the applicants to come back before the BCC with an amendment of the PUD Ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no
guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the
new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318.Date Revised: 1/23/10
Page lof8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23.2010
Page 2 of 199
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to
meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier Countv
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include
building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem
tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that
the inclusion of impact fees and taxes collected are for informational purposes only; they are not
included in the criteria used by Staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed
Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), and is within a residential density band, as identified
on the Future Land Use Map and in the FLUE of the GMP. Relevant to the subject petition, this
Subdistrict permits residential development (variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling
units per acre (DU/A) and a maximum of 16 DU/A, subject to the Density Rating System
provisions; and, recreation and open space uses.
Review of the Density Rating System yields the site is eligible for the base density of 4 DU/A
and the residential density band density bonus of up to 3 DU/ A, yielding a total eligible density
of 7 DU/A or 294 dwelling units (DUs). The existing PUD is approved for a maximum of 231
DUs (5.49 DU/A). With this petition, the total number of DUs remains at 231 but the acreage
increase results in a density decrease to 4.9 I DU/ A.
Base Density
Residential Densitv Band Bonus
Total Eligible Density:
Total Approved Density
Total Proposed Density
4.00 DU/A
+3.00 DU/A
7.00 DU/A = 294 DUs
5.49 DU/A = 231 DUs
4.91 DU/A = 231 DUs
Below are select FLUE policies, in italics, followed by staff analysis, in bold print within
brackets.
Objective 7: /n an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better
Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth
policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following
policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where
applicable.
Policy 7./: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their
properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made
without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318
Date Revised: 1/23/10
Page 2 of8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 3 of 199
project does not front an arterial or collector road, but there is an access road - Magnolia
Pond Drive, which connects to C.R. 951, a collector roadway at this location.)
Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help
reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for
traffic signals. [As depicted on the Master Plan, the project provides internal accesses
within the development.)
Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets
and their interconnection point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless
of land use type. [1-75 lies to the south and the Golden Gate canal lies to the north.
Interconnections are not feasible to the west as the site abuts water retention area and
athletic fields of Golden Gate High School. Interconnections are not feasible to the east as
the site abuts Mike Davis Elementary School and a preserve area lying north of Magnolia
Pond Drive (both within Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD), and abuts a preserve area
lying south of Magnolia Pond Drive (within Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce
Center PUD). It is acknowledged that a "proposed pedestrian interconnection" to the east,
south of Magnolia Pond Drive, is identified on the PUD Master Plan.)
Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with
a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and
types. [This project provides open space and recreational facilities. No sidewalk deviation
has been requested; therefore sidewalks will be subject to LDC requirements to provide
them.)
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic
Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period upon provision of
mitigation. Therefore, the subject application can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element of the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Objective 2.2 of the CCME states
"all canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal,
state, or local water quality standards. The Magnolia Pond MPUD is within the Main Golden
Gate Canal Basin, and the allowable discharge for that basin is 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs)
per acre. This project will not discharge storm water into the preserves. The stormwater will be
discharged directly into the neighboring swales and canals.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
This request contains no provisions to address Affordable-Workforce housing demand.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the MPUD documents to address any
environmental concerns. This petition was required to submit an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). The subject site consists of 4 I. I 0 acres of native vegetation and 2 1.9 percent
(10.28 acres) of the indigenous vegetation will be utilized as the preserve. The preserve area have
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318
Date Revised: 1/23/1 0
Page 30[8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 4 of 199
been redesigned to the south half of the subject property south of Magnolia Pond Drive because it
allows for a connection to the adjacent 15 acre upland preserves on the Collier Boulevard Mixed
Use Commerce Center PUD. The location provides the best habitat and the largest contiguous
preserve area possible. There are Gopher Tortoises located on site and they will be re-Iocated off-
site.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC heard this petition on September 2,2009, and voted 5-0 approves this petition with the
following stipulations:
Stormwater Management
1. South Florida Water Management District permit modifications shall be obtained
prior to the next Development Order.
Environmental
2. Provide Florida Black Bear and Big Cypress fox squirrel management plans as part
of the next Development Order.
3. Provide a Gopher Tortoise relocation management plan as part of the next
Development Order.
4. Provide a report to the Environmental Services staff on the results of the relocation of
gopher tortoises within thirty days of relocation. The report must contain the following
information: the number of burrows excavated, the number of tortoises relocated, and the
final relocation site.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDA nON:
The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318 on January 7, 2010, and by a vote of8 to 0
(Commissioner Karen Homiak was not present for the vote) recommended to forward this
petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the draft ordinance that was reviewed and recommended for approval at that hearing
and the subsequent January 21,2010 CCPC consent hearing. The petitioner's agent submitted a
two-page addenda list to the CCPC at the January 7,2010 hearing. A copy of that addenda list is
included in the application material. The PUD document has been revised to include the changes
approved from the addenda sheet. In addition, the CCPC recommended the following additional
stipulations:
1. Add Clubhouses as a use in PUD Exhibit A, Section B.2; and
2. Revise Exhibit B, Table 1, to include another column to provide development criteria for
Clubhouse uses; and
3. Revise Exhibit B, Table 1, to add a 75.Joot wide setbackfor the MPUD boundary from 1-
75; and
4. Revise Exhibit F, to remove Section 3.A and E; and
5. Revise Exhibit F, Section 4, to remove item D; and
6. Revise Exhibit F, Section 6, to remove the sentence "All buildings shall be primarily
finished in light subdued colors with stucco except for decorative trim" for Section A;
and
Magnolia Pond MPUD Page 4 of 8
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318
Date Revised: 1/23/10
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 5 of 199
7. Revise the Master Concept Plan to add another turn-around midway along the east/west
running internal roadway shown south of Magnolia Pond Drive; and
8. Revise General Note #2 to be consistent with the revision made in PUD Exhibit A,
Section A.4.
Because there was no objection to the request and the EAC and the CCPC votes were both
unanimous, this petition can be heard on the BCC Summary agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is a site specific rezone from the Magnolia Pond Planned Unit Development (PUD) and
Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning Districts to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) for a
project to be known as Magnolia Pond MPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that
the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to
the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to determine
that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be
accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more ofthe listed criteria below.
Criteria for MPUD Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained
at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only
after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives and policies
of the Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on
design, and buffering and screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve
the development?
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AJt-10318
Dale Revised: 1/23/10
Page 5 of8
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 6 of 199
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the pwpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and
private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public pwposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use
pattern?
II. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege
to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PlnDZ-A-2006-AJt-l0318
Date Revised: 1/23/10
Page 6 of8
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 7 of 199
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of
potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on
the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of
service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code
ch.106, art.II], as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that
the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This Executive Summary has been reviewed
for legal sufficiency and is legally sufficient for Board action. (STW)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment to
the Magnolia Pond PUD as proposed, subject to staff's and the CCPC conditions of approval
shown in the proposed amending ordinance. That ordinance includes the following conditions
added by the CCPC:
1. Add Clubhouses as a use in PUD Exhibit A, Section B.2; and
2. Revise Exhibit B, Table 1, to include another column to provide development criteria for
Clubhouse uses; and
3. Revise Exhibit B, Table 1, to add a 75-foot wide setbackfor the MPUD boundary from 1-
75; and
4. Revise Exhibit F, to remove Section 3.A and E; and
5. Revise Exhibit F, Section 4, to remove item D; and
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AJt-I0318
Date Revised: 1/23/10
Page 7 0[8
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23. 2010
Page 8 of 199
6. Revise Exhibit F, Section 6, to remove the sentence "All buildings shall be primarily
finished in light subdued colors with stucco except for decorative trim" for Section A;
and
7. Revise the Master Concept Plan to add another turn-around midway along the east/west
running internal roadway shown south of Magnolia Pond Drive; and
8. Revise General Note #2 to be consistent with the revision made in PUD Exhibit A,
Section A.4.
PREPARED BY:
Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Engineering, Environmental, Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Services
Magnolia Pond MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318
Date Revised: 1/23/10
Page 8 of8
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 9 of 199
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
17A
This item requires that all participants be swom in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318: Pawel and Teryl Brzeski, Magnolia Pond
Holdings, LLC and Teryl Brzeski, Trustee of the Land Trust # 1-B, represented by Davidson
Engineering and Patrick White of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP, are requesting a
rezone from the Magnolia Pond Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance No. 98-49, and
Rural Agricutture (A) Zoning Districts to a Mixed-Use Planned Untt Development (MPUD) to
be known as Magnolia Pond MPUD, permitting 231 mutti-family dwelling units and/or an
assisted living facility (ALF) at a floor area ratio of 0.60 with the applicant seeking to add an
additional 5 acres to the site. The subject property is 47.05 acres and is located on the north
side of the 1-75 right-of-way and haW mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) in Section 34,
Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (CTS)
2123120109:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Kay Deselem, AICP
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Planner, Principal
Date
Zoning & Land Development Review
1/231201012:34:33 PM
Approved By
William D. Lorenz, Jr., P.E.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Director. coes Engineering Services
Date
Engineering & Environmental Services
1126/201010:26 AM
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Transportation Division
Administrator - Transportation
Date
Transportation Administration
1/26120103:24 PM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Date
1128/20103:43 PM
Approved By
Steven Williams
County Attorney
Assistant County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
1/2912010 11 :47 AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
Approved By
1/29/20103:56 PM
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Manager a Planning
Date
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 10 of 199
Environmental Services
Zoning & Land Development Review
2/1/20109:44 AM
Approved By
Nick Casalangulda
Director - Transportation Planning
Date
Transportation Division
Transportation Planning
2/2/20108:03 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
2/2/20104:34 PM
Approved By
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
County Manager
Date
County Managers Office
County Managers Office
2/12/20104:53 PM
. Agenda ItemNo. 17A
AGEN6~~.w.C2010
~age n of 199
Co1A!l" Cou.nty
~~ -
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2009
SUBJECT:
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318; MAGNOLIA POND MPUD
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner:
Magnolia Pond Holdings, LLC and Land Trust #IB
5147 Seahorse Avenue
Naples, FL 34103
Agent(s):
Tim Hancock, AICp.
Davidson Engineering, Inc
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34105
Patrick White
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur
5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34108
REOUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) consider a rezone of
the subject site from the Magnolia Pond Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance No. 98-49,
and Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning Districts to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to
be known as Magnolia Pond MPUD zoning district.
GEOGRAPIDC LOCATION:
The subject PUD is located on the north side of the 1-75 right-of-way and half mile west of Collier
Boulevard (CR-951) in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
(See location map on/ollowing page)
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 1 of 16
I !!I!
~ il Q,!
II I a..
~I e:(
:2
C>
I Z
.. -
z
0
l N
....UJIIdlllfl'
~ ~ 5
i ..
'"
~ J ~ ; c
~
I '"
..
.. ,
..
c
C
N
,
N
J'TQ:CIIlO1f / Z- c
- :J
"-
..
z
I !I. 0
i. t-
oll . . . ;::
w
I u "-
I I. I j. a..
i. .i! e:(
Ii' . 51 . il '
I I II I :2
-- ~w
t z
i~ ! w 0
I l-
.il . i1i -
I I I I l-
e:(
I . ii' I 0
I I 0
-In I I ....J
r I
-~
l- I
i.
I~. "II 2ij .
I i
~
. f. · . . --
.--
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 13 of 199
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTlON OF PROJECT:
The subject petition is to amend the sunsetted Magnolia Pond PUD (approximately 42.05:1: acres)
and remove the inconsistent language in the PUDas well as add a 5-acre parcel at the northeast
comer of Magnolia Pond PUD without increasing the approved maximum of 231 dwelling units.
The multi-residential use portion will pennit a maximum density of 4.91 dwelling units per acre
and a maximum of 231 dwelling units andlor an assisted living facility (ALF) at a floor area ratio
of 0.60, as well as a County pedestrianlbicycle trail. The Magnolia Pond MPUD document
provides for viable nafurally functioning native vegetation on-site to be retained.
The subject site was first rezoned to PUD on June 9, 1998 (Ordinance No. 98-49). Then on
. September 21, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) heard and approved Petition
PUDEX-2004-AR-5897, to extend the Magnolia Pond PUD, sunset date to June 9, 2005
(Resolution No. 04-284). Subsequently the applicants went before the Board of Zoning Appeals
(BZA) on February 14,2006 for a second PUD Extension. At the hearing the BZA reviewed the
PUD extension request and determined to deny the request to extend the current PUD zoning
because it did not meet the five year GMP consistency evaluation (Resolution No. 06-36). The
BZA directed the applicants to come back before the BCC with an amendment of the PUD
Ordinance,
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Single-Family homes in Golden Gate City, Main Golden Gate Canal, with a zoning
designation of Single-Family Residential (RSF-3) maximum density of 3 dwelling units
per acre.
East: Multi-Family apartment buildings, and vacant land, with a zoning designation of Golden
Gate Commerce Park PUD approved for 343 single-family and multi-family dwelling
units at a gross density of 7 dwelling units per acre and 240,000 square feet of
commercial and a maximum of 30,000 square feet of office floor area with a 150 room
hotel; and Collier Boulevard Mixed-Use Commerce Park PUD approved for 433 single-
family and multi-family dwelling units at a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre and
a maximum of 240,000 square feet of commercial and a maximum of 30,000 square feet
of office floor area. A maximum of 150 hotel/motel units are also permitted at a
maximum of 0,60 floor area ratio.
South: Interstate-75 right-of-way (ROW), and Multi-Family dwelling units and preserves, with a
zoning designation of Sherwood Park PUD approved for 336 multi-family dwelling units
at a gross density of 4.2 dwelling units per acre; and Saddlebrook Village PUD that has
438 multi-family dwelling units at a gross density of 12.96 dwelling units per acre; and
Rural Agriculture (A) with a maximum density of I dwelling unit per 5 acres.
West: Golden Gate High School, with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A) with a
maximum density of I dwelling unit per 5 acres.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 2 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 14 of 199
Aerial of subiect property
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed
Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), and is within a residential density band, as identified
on the Future Land Use Map and in the FLUE of the GMP. Relevant to the subject petition, this
Subdistrict pennits residential development (variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling
units per acre (DU/A) and a maximum of 16 DU/A, subject to the Density Rating System
provisions; and, recreation and open space uses.
Review of the Density Rating System yields the site is eligible for the base density of 4 DU/ A
and the residential density band density bonus of up to 3 DU/ A, yielding a total eligible density
of 7 DU/A or 294 dwelling units (DUs) , The existing PUD is approved for a maximum of 231
DUs (5.49 DU/A). With this petition, the total number of DUs remains at 231 but the acreage
increase results in a density decrease to 4.91 DU/A.
Page 3 of 16
PUDZ.A.2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 15 of 199
Base Density
Residential Density Band Bonus
Total Eligible Density:
Total Approved Density
Total Proposed Density
4.00 DU/A
+3.00 DU/A
7.00 DU/A = 294 DUs
5.49 DU/A= 231 DUs
4.91 DU/A=231 DUs
Below are select FLUE policies, in italics, followed by staff analysis, in bold print within
brackets.
Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better
Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart grawth
policies, and adhere to the existing development character of CoIIier County, the foI/owing
policies shaI/ be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where
applicable.
Policy 7, I: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their
properties to fronting coI/ector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be
made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The
project does not front an arterial or coUector road, but there is an access road - Magnolia
Pond Drive, which connects to C.R. 951, an arterial roadway.)
Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help
reduce vehicle congestion on nearby coI/ector and arterial roads and minimize the need for
traffic signals. [As depicted on the Master Plan, the project provides internal accesses
within the development.)
Policy 7.3: AI/ new and existing developments shaI/ be encouraged to connect their local streets
and their interconnection point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless
of land use type. [1-75 lies to the south and the Golden Gate canal lies to the north.
Interconnections are not feasible to the west as the site abuts water retention area and
athletic fields of Golden Gate mgh SchooL Interconnections are not feasible to the east as
the site abuts Mike Davis Elementary School and a preserve area lying north of Magnolia
Pond Drive (both within Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD), and abuts a preserve area
lying south of Magnolia Pond Drive (within Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce
Center PUD). It is acknowledged that a "proposed pedestrian interconnection" to the east,
south of Magnolia Pond Drive, is identified on the PUD Master Plan.)
Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with
a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and
types. [This project provides open space and recreational facilities. No sidewalk deviation
has been requested; therefore sidewalks will be subject to LDC requirements to provide
them.)
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic
hnpact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period upon provision of
PUDZ.A.2006-AR.10318
Rev: 11.17.09
Page 4 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 16 of 199
mitigation. Therefore, the subject application can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the
Transportation Element of the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Objective 2.2 of the CCME states
"all canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal,
state, or local water quality standards. The Magnolia Pond MPUD is within the Main Golden
Gate Canal Basin, and the allowable discharge for that basin is 0.1 5 cfs per acre. This project
will not discharge stormwater into the preserves. The stormwater will be discharged directly into
the neighboring swales and canals.
GMP Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed PUD
amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria
upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection
10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD
Findings"), and Subsection 10.03.05.1, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report
(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to
the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An
evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land
Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses:
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the MPUD
documents to address any environmental concerns. This petition was required to submit an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS). The subject site consists of 41.1 0 acres of native
vegetation and 21.9 percent (10.28 acres) of the indigenous vegetation will be utilized as the
preserve. The preserve area has been redesigned to the south half of the subject property south of
Magnolia Pond Drive because it allows for a connection to the adjacent 15 acre upland preserves
on the Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce Center PUD. The location provides the best
habitat and the largest contiguous preserve area possible. There are Gopher Tortoises located on
site and they will be re-located off-site.
Transoortation Review: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and notes the
Collier Boulevard (CR-951) Impacts: The first concurrency link that is significantly impacted is
link 32.2, Collier Boulevard (CR-951) between 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway. The project
generates 58 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on Collier Boulevard (CR-95 I). These 58
northbound trips represent a significant 2.3 percent impact 011 Collier Boulevard (CR-95I ). This
segment of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) currently has a remaining capacity of 186 trips, and is
currently at Level of Service "D" as reflected by the 2009 Annual Update and Inventory Report
(AUIR).
No subsequent links of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) are significantly impacted, and for that
reason additional analysis was not required for weekday PM Peak Hour impacts.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 5 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 17 of 199
Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staffhas reviewed the petition and notes the following:
No objection. Any portions of this MPUD to be developed shall be required to comply with the
current Ordinance No. 2004-31, as amended. The project is subject to the conditions associated
with a Water and Sewer Availability Letter from the Collier County Utilities Division.
Emerl!encv Manal!ement Review: Emergency Management staff provided the following
comment: The Magnolia Pond MPUD is located in a category three (CAT 3) hurricane surge
zone, which requires evacuation during some hurricane events. Residential development in this
area further taxes an already tight evacuation and sheltering situation within Collier County.
While there is currently no impact mitigation required for this, it should be noted that approval of
this MPUD increases the evacuation and sheltering requirements for the County.
Parks and Recreation Review: Parks and Recreation staff provided the following comment The
County Parks and Recreation Department has a commitment from the property owners that they
will grant a 20-foot public access easement along the northern property line (the south side of the
Golden Gate Main Canal). The Real Estate Services Section will draft the easement. Parks has
been in the process of surveying this area in order to fInalize the design of the "Golden Gate
Greenway" and begin putting this project out for bid. To date, Collier County Real Property
Management (RPM) and Parks have obtained necessary easements or fee interests to complete
this project, with the exception of the area within the proposed Magnolia Pond MPUD. The
purpose of the 20-foot wide easement is to accommodate a 10-foot sidewalk for public use to be
installed by the County to link Collier Boulevard (CR-951) to the Forest Park PUD, wherein a
dedicated easement to the County for a sidewalk, bicycle and pedestrian access already exists.
Affordable Housinl! Review: The Housing and Human Services staff has not reviewed this
petition since the proposed amendment will not affect housing issues that may have been
previously reviewed and approved. The petitioner has not volunteered to contribute to any
affordable housing funds.
Zoninfl Review: Staff reviewed the Magnolia Pond PUD and A zoning districts for the
appropriateness of the proposed MPUD rezone and found the residential and ALF land use's
intensity on the subject site are compatible land uses in the Urban Mixed Use District. The
compatibility analysis included a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding properties.
The review was based on the intensity of the use, similar development standards such as the
building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, the amount of open space and traffic generation.
Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of
surrounding neighborhoods and property as set forth in Subsection 4.07.02.B of the LDC, As
previously stated, the subject site is adjacent on the north to the Golden Gate Canal which
provides a buffer to the RSF-3 zoning district. The proposed MPUD will provide a transition
from the projected commercial zoning along the eastern property to the Golden Gate High
School land use on the western boundary of the subject property.
As stated earlier, part of the petition request is to rezone a 5-acre parcel which will be added to
the original 42.05 acre property at the Northeast Corner of Magnolia Pond PUD. Although there
is no increase in the number of residential units, the site will be permitted to be developed as an
assisted living facility (ALF) with a floor area ratio of 0.60 and for every acre of ALF developed,
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 6 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 18 of 199
8.27 dwelling units will be subtracted from the maximum 231 permitted dwelling units. The
existing land use is consistent with those allowed in the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict set forth in the GMP as well as the proposed ALF land use.
Although the applicant is repealing Ordinance No. 98-49 and replacing it with the proposed
MPUD, staff required the agents to do a strike-through underline version of the PUD. The strike-
through and underline version removes references to outdated Land Development Code (LDC)
sections and language and replaces them with current sections and language. The table below
provides a comparison of the current PUD development standards with the proposed MPUD:
Proposed MPUD Development Standards vs. existing Magnolia Pond PUD (Ord. No. 98-49)
PROPOSED MPUD EXISTING PUD PROPOSED MPUD EXISTING PUD
Sinl>le-familv Single-familv Two-familv Two-familv
Minimum Lot Area 7.500 SQuare feet 7,500 SQuare feet 5,000 snuare feet
Minimum Lot Width 50 feet interior 60 reet interior 90 feet interior 90 feet interior
60 feet comer 70 feet comer 110 reet comer I ] 0 feet comer
Minimum Front Yard I 5 reet 25 feet I 5 feet 20 feet
Setback
Minimum Side Yard o feet & 10 feet o feet & ]0 feet 15 feet o feet & 10 feet
Setback or both 5 feet or both 5 feet or both 5 feet
Rear Yard Setback
Principal 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Accessory 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Preserve Setback
Principal 25 reet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Accessory 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Zoned Height:
Principal Building 35 feet & 2 stories 35 feet & 2 stories 3 g feet & 3 stories 3 g feet & 3 stories
Accessorv Buildin" 20 feet/Clubhouse 35 feet 20 feet/Clubhouse 35 feet 20 feet/Clubhouse 35 feet 20 feet/Clubhouse 3 5 feet
Actual Height:
Principal Building 42 feet & 2 stories 42 feet & 2 stories 45 feet & 3 stories 45 feet & 3 stories
Accessory Building 27 feet/Clubhouse 42 feet 27 feet/Clubhouse 42 feet 27 feet/Clubhouse 42 feet 27 feet/Clubhouse 42 feet
Residential Density 4.9DUslA 5.49 DUslA 4.9DUs/A 5.49 DUs/A
The Master Plan as provided in Exhibit C of the MPUD Ordinance depicts the areas of
development, water management, traffic and pedestrian circulation. Furthermore, the Master
Plan depicts the 10.28 acres of preserve along the southeast boundary of the subject site. Notes
on the Master Plan reinforce the petitioner's intention to provide a 30-foot drainage easement
along the eastern property boundary for stonnwater management, and several pedestrian
interconnections and 40 percent of open space that will include landscaping, lakes and preserves.
The site will be accessed from Magnolia Pond Drive which was built in cooperation with the
land owner, the County and the Collier County School District With the development standards
contained in the proposed MPUD, the project would be compatible and in harmony with the
residential and commercial land uses in the surrounding area and the land uses. Based on staff's
review of the adjacent existing and anticipated land uses, the proposed MPUD is compatible,
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 7 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 19 of 199
POO Findinl!S: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its
recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the POO Master
Plan's compliance with the following criteria":
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and
access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
The type and pattern of development have been reviewed and found compliant
with all applicable LDC and GMP regulations. Furthermore, this project, as it
develops, will be required to comply with all county regulations' regarding
drainage, sewer, water and other utilities pursuant to Sections 6.02.04 through
6.02.08, of the LDC. In addition, the proposed rezone will not change the
current land uses that were approved in 1998 except for the addition of the
ALF land use.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly
as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not /0 be provided
or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with this application provided satisfactory evidence of
unified control. The proposed MPUD document and the applicable LDC
development regulations make appropriate provisions for the operation and
maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives,
and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
On page three (3) of this staff report, the Comprehensive Planning Department
provided a detailed analysis of how this project meets the goals, objectives,
policies and FLUE ofthe GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
The MPUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize the internal and
external land use to be compatible with the community. The developer will have
to adhere to the development standards that are contained in the MPUD
Ordinance, and the buffering requirements on the Master Plan, are comparable
to the standards contained in the LDC.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 8 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 20 of 199
The amount of usable open space for Magnolia Pond MPUD is 17.22:1: acres
which is 36.6:1: percent of the subject site dedicated to usable open space. This
project exceeds the minimum requirement of the LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements andfacilities, both public and private,
There are adequate public facilities in place to serve this project. In addition,
any development for the subject site will have to adhere to the transportation
commitments contained in the MPUD Ordinance as well as be in compliance
with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when the
subsequent development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Capacity of wastewater and utilities are currently available for this
development of the subject site. In addition, the petitioner proposes a
contribution of proportionate share costs toward planned intersection and
signalization improvements at Collier Boulevard (CR-951), and Maguolia Pond
Road at the time of the first Development Order application. Furthermore, the
applicant has agreed to provide drainage and access rights as outlined in
Exhibit "F" of the MPUD ordinance.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
The development standards proposed are similar to the development standards
described in Section 4.02.01, and Section 4.07.02, of the LDC. They are also
similar to the currently approved standards of the approved Magnolia Pond
PUD.
Rezone Findinl!S: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of
land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County
Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered
proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these
criteria are provided in bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, &
policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management
Plan.
As noted in the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report, the proposed uses
and development standards would generally further the goals and objectives of
the FLUE and the applicable portions of the CCME and the Transportation
PUDZ-A-2006-AR.10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 9 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23. 2010
Page 21 of 199
Element. Therefore staff recommendation on page 4 of this staff report was
found to be consistent with the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The existing land use pattern to the north is single-family dwelling units. The
existing land use pattern to the east, west and south provides for mixed-use
land uses that include Single-Family and Multi-Family dwellings.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts,
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed MPUD amendment will not result in an
isolated district unrelated to the adjacent and nearby commercial and
residential zoning districts as was previously determined when the property
was lirst rezoned to PUD. Furthermore, the rezone request does not change the
projects consistency with the FLUE.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposedfor change.
As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the
existing district boundaries are logically drawn in relation to existing conditions
on the property and follow the property ownership boundaries. As depicted on
the MPUD Master Plan, the additional 5 acre site will be used for future
development and the County's pedestrian pathwaylbikepath.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
The applicant is seeking to amend the existing PUD to accommodate the
expansion ofthe Magnolia Pond PUD and to remove the current sunset status.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed amendment will not adversely impact the previous BCC Findings
that the project is designed to provide protection of the development from
potentially adverse surrounding influences and protection of the surrounding
area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the MPUD.
Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of the MPUD district
shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscapinglbuffering
requirements of Sections 4.06.01 through 4.06.06, of the LDC. These Sections
have been designed to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise,
or other adverse off-site influences, or to protect residents of adjoining districts
from similar possible influences from within the PUD district.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 10 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 22 of 199
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion
or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because
of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise qfJect public safety.
At the time of development order approval, the petitioner shall contribute a
proportionate share costs toward the planned intersection improvements at
Magnolia Pond Drive and Collier Boulevard (CR-951). Therefore, this petition
can be deemed consistent with both policies 5.1 and 5.8.d, of the Transportation
Element of the GMP. As a result, this project should not create types of traffic
deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses and it should not affect the
pnblic safety.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
Any proposed water management and drainage system will need to be designed
to prevent drainage problems on site and be compatible with the adjacent water
management systems. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have regulations in
place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments will not create
drainage problems.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to acffacent areas.
The currently approved development standards provided in the Magnolia Pond
PUD and in the proposed amendment are compatible and similar to
development standards provided in Section 4.02.01, of the LDC. Also, the
proposed MPUD will be adhering to the buffering requirement per the LDC
and the existing 5.57 acre lakes and the 10.28 acre preserve that is adjacent to
the Collier Boulevard Mixed-Use Commerce Center PUD will help to maintain
light and air circulation to the adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely qfJect property values in the adjacent
area.
The subject site was approved in 1998 for the Magnolia Pond PUD Zoning
District and it was found during the approval process that the rezone should
not adversely affect property values. Given that the previously approved
residential land use is not changing, the proposed MPUD should not adversely
affect property values in the adjacent area. It should be noted that the
surrounding commercial and residential PUD's were approved after the
sunsetted Magnolia Pond PUD. However, this is a subjective determination
based upon anticipated results which may be internal or external to the subject
property. Since property valuation is affected by several factors and zoning by
itself mayor may not affect the values of the adja,cent area.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Page 11 of 16
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev; 11-17'()9
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 23 of 199
The current landscape and buffer requirements in conjunction with the
preserve area and lakes, and the proposed development standards combined
with the site development plan approval process, provides assurance that the
proposed MPOO will not result in a deterrence for improvements to the
adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
The subject site will not constitute a special privilege because the proposed
development complies with the GMP. On page three (3) of this report, the
MPOO request was found to be consistent with the FLUE. Consistency with the
FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions
consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantia! reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The property sunsetted in 2006 and the developer could not develop the
Magnolia Pond PUD until the ordinance was amended to current GMP and
LDC provisions. The proposed rezone is necessary to incorporate the
Agricultural zoned property to the project that will be used for expansion
purposes.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the County.
The Magnolia Pond MPOO was designed to meet the intent of the Urban Mixed
Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
This criterion does not apply since the Magnolia Pond PUD has existed since
the original POO was granted by Collier County in 1998 and was reevaluated in
2001 when the PUD was reviewed for an extension.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required 10 make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
The extent of the site alteration will be required to go through extensive
evaluation by federal, state, and local development regulations during any site
development plan approval process.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 12 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23. 2010
Page 24 of 199
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria described in the PUD
Ordinance, as well as all the regulations set forth in the LDC and the Adequate
Public Facilities Ordinance.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking 2 deviations from the requirements of the LDC.
The deviations are found in PUD Exhibit E.
Deviation No. I seeks relief from the LDC Section 4.06.02(C)2, Buffer Yard Requirements,
which requires an Alternative B (IS foot wide) Landscape Buffer, to allow for a reduction in
width to 10 feet when the common property line between single or two family units and multi-
family units are intemal to the project and employ a similar architectural theme.
Petitioner's Rationale: Deviation No. I is sought to reduce any required intemal buffer from IS
feet to 10 feet in width where multi-family abuts single or two-family development. The
minimum plantings shall be maintained consistent with the type 'B' requirements but the buffer
width shall only be required to measure 10 feet. This is only applied where the architectural
styles are similar from one product to the other. Since the maximum permitted height for the two
districts varies by only 3 feet, the massing may be similar which would warrant a reduction in
buffer width.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff
recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.I3.A.3, the petitioner
has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health,
safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.I3,B.5.h, the petitioner has
demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
Furthermore, staff found Deviation No. I appropriate based on the public good that will be
provided as part of the MPUD at the expense of developable project area. The petitioner has
contribute a 30-foot wide drainage easement that totals 1.59 acres (2303.5 feet by 30 feet) along
the eastern property boundary and a 20-foot wide public access easement that totals 0.3 acres
(658 feet by 20 feet) along the northern property boundary for a pedestrianlbicycIe trail for a total
of 1.89 acres which represents 4.5 percent of the total project area being set aside for a public
benefit.
Deviation No.2 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06,0, which requires a minimum local street
right-of-way width of 60 feet.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 13 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 25 of 199
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant has shown that a 50-foot ROW can accommodate the
necessary infrastructure to serve the development without sacrificing the required widths for
sidewalks, travel lane widths, etc. Since the roadways are essentially cul-de-sacs and wiIl be
privately maintained, a 60-foot ROW is unnecessary and excessive for a small development with
roadways carrying a minimum amount of traffic.
Staff Analysis and Recommendatwn: Zoning and Land Development Review staff
recorirmends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10,02.13.A.3, the petitioner
has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health,
safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.l3.B.5.h, the petitioner has
demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
Staff agrees that a fifty 50-foot right-of-way for a residential street can successfully facilitate
movement of the vehicular, pedestrian and bike traffic while accommodating all utility and
drainage needs. This dimension for a neighborhood ROW accommodates all the standard
roadway functions so that the development is compact. Furthermore, considering the proximity
to the Golden Gate High School the proposed development scenario of 50 feet is safer for
pedestrian traffic because it shortens the crossing distance and discourages higher speed traffic.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL iliAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC heard this petition on September 2, 2009, and voted 5-0 to approve this petition with
the foIlowing stipulations:
Stormwater Management
I. South Florida Water Management District permit modifications shall be obtained
prior to the next Development Order.
Environmental
2. Provide Florida Black Bear and Big Cypress fox squirrel management plans as part of
the next Development Order.
3. Provide a Gopher Tortoise relocation management plan as part of the next
Development Order.
4. Provide a report to the Environmental Services staff on the results of the relocation of
gopher tortoises within thirty days of relocation. The report must contain the
following information: the number of burrows excavated, the number of tortoises
relocated, and the final relocation site.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The meeting was held on February 17, 2009 at 5:30 p.m. at the Comfort Inn & Suites. Four
people from the public attended, as well as the applicant's team (Tim Hancock, AICP and
Frederick Hood, AICP with Davidson Engineering) and county staff.
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 14 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 26 of 199
Mr. Hood presented an overview of the requested MPUD Amendment their client is seeking. Mr.
Hood explained that this rezone is being sought in order to comply with current Land
Development Code (LDC) provisions. Furthermore, the applicant is including a five acre site that
is adjacent to the Magnolia Pond MPUD on the east that is zoned Rural Agricultural, to be
included within the MPUD along with an Assisted Living Facility use.
The neighbors who attended the meeting requested the agents keep the site plan as shown
because they thought the smaller lake that is in close proximity to the Golden Gate Canal would
be aesthetically pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood and would shield the proposed
residential property from the 20-foot pedestrian pathway/greenway. Mr. Hancock, along with
staff, explained that if a developer did not want to build the lake shown on the conceptual site
plan, the owners would have to amend the MPUD ordinance.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVmW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PUDZ-A-2006-AR-I0318 revised
on November 17, 2009 and reviewed on November 25,2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition PUDZ-A-
2006-AR-I0381 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the conditions of approval contained in the MPUD ordinance of adoption.
Attachments: A. Ordinance
B. Application
C. Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)
D. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
E. Ordinance 98-49
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 15 of 16
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 27 of 199
PREPARED BY:
1J1f/l ~ ~ ~ 11- L (';- ~"'"'.9
MELISS~z"ONE, CIPALPLANNER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
/2.- 1." O~
V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE
NT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~'n7.~ M~h~
......SUSAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPROVED BY:
/;2./7Id'l
J S H K. SCHMITI ADMINISTRATOR DATE'
o MUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
Tentatively scheduled for the February 23, 2010 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
-M~/r\~~~
MARK . STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
/-1---/0
DATE
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318
Rev: 11-17-09
Page 16 of 16
caffft; County
~ -
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 28 of 199
Memorandum
To:
Melissa Zone, Principal Planner, Dept. of Zoning and Land Development Review
From:
David Weeks, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Department
Date:
December 2, 2009
Subject:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review- 3rt! memo
PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-A-2006-AR- 10318 (REV: 5, 1017/09 routing date)
PETITION NAME: Magnolia Pond PUD
REQUEST: Amend the existing Magnolia Pond PUD to add a 5-acre parcel at the northeast comer of the PUD
(increase from 42.05:1: acres to 47.051 acres) without changing the land use (Residential) or increasing the
pennitted number of dwelling units (231 maximum); and, change the PUD document format to a series of PUD
exhibits in accordance with the present fonnat for PODs.
LOCATION: The site is located on the north side of 1-75, approximately Y, mile west of Collier Boulevard
(CR 951), in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East; it is bisected by Magnolia Pond Drive.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed
Use District. Urban Residential Subdistrict), and is within a residential density band. as identified on the Future
Land Use Map and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. Relevant to this
petition, this Subdistrict permits residential development (variety of unit types) at a base density of 4 dwelling
units per acre (DU/A) and a maximum of 16 DUlA, subject to the Density Rating System provisions; and,
recreation and open space uses.
Review of the Density Rating System yields the site is eligible for the base density of 4 DUI A and the residential
density band density bonus of up to 3 DUI A, yielding a total eligible density of 7 DUI A or 294 dwelling units
(DUs). The existing PUD is approved for a maximum of231 DUs (5,49 DU/A). With this petition. the total
number ofDUs remains at 231 but the acreage increase results in a density decrease to 4.91 DU/A.
Base Density
Residential Densitv Band Bonus
Total Eligible Density:
Total Approved Density
Total Proposed Density
4.00 DU/A
+3.00 DU/A
7.00 DUlA = 294 DUs
5.49 DU/A = 231 DUs
4,91 DU/A=231 DUs
Below are select FLUE policies, in italics, followed by staff analysis, in bold print within brackets,
Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as
set forth in the Land Development Code. [It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land Development
Review staff, as part of their review ofthe petition in its entirety, to perform the compatibility analysis.)
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 29 of 199
Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The
Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the
existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new
development and redevelopment projects, where applicable.
Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection
spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The project does not front an arterial or collector
road, bnt there is an access road - Magnolia Pond Drive, whleh connects to C.R. 951, an arterial
roadway.)
Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the needfor traffic signals. [As depicted on the
Master Plan, the project provides Internal aceesses within the development.)
Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [1-75
lies to the south and the Golden Gate canailles to the north. Interconnections are not feasible to the west
as the site abuts water retention area and athletic fields of Golden Gate High School. Interconnections
are not feasible to the east as the site abuts Mike Davis Elementary School and a preserve area lying
north of Magnolia Pond Drive (both within Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD), and abuts a preserve
area lying south of Magnolia Pond Drive (within CoOler Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce Center PUD).
It Is acknowledged that a "proposed pedestrian interconnection" to the east, south of Magnolia Pond
Drive, is identified on the PUD Master Plan.)
Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of
densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [This project provides
open space and recreational facilities. No sidewalk deviation has been requested; therefore sidewalks will
be subject to LDC requirements to provide them.)
Review ofPUD Exhibits
· Within the PUD exhibits, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed in this PUD (231) is only
noted on Exhibit A, Section A.4, in a parenthetical explanation of the conversion ratio of assisted living
facility units to dwelling units. It is suggested that this maximum dwelling unit figure be more
prominently listed on Exhibit A and be added to Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed PUD amendment may be deemed consistent
with the Future Land Use Element.
(ON CD PLUS)
co: Ray Bellows, Manager, Zoning and Land Development Review Department
Randy Cohen, AICP, Director. Comprehensive Planning Department
PUDZ-A.2006.AR.10318 Magnolia Pond PUD 3" memo
G:\Conslstency Reviews\2009\PUDZ.A
dw.lJyJ11.1Wgend 12.2.()9
2
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 30 of 199
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF Sentember 2Dd. 2009
Agenda Item VI D
I. NAME OF PETITIONERlPROJECf
Petition No: Residential Planned Unit Development Rezone
No: PUDZ-2006-AR -10318
Petition Name: Magnolia Pond PUD
ApplicantlDeveloper: Magnolia Pond Holdings LLC and Land Trust
Engineering Consultant: Q. Grady Minor and Associates. Inc.
Environmental Consultant: Davidson Engineering Inc.
U. LOCATION
The subject property, consisting of 47:1: acres, is located on Magnolia Drive, west
of Collier Boulevard (CR-951), between Interstate -75 and the Golden Gate Canal,
in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
UI. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
The neighborhood border to the north of this PUD is Residential Single-Family
District (RSF-3). The Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD and Collier Boulevard
Mixed-Use Commerce Center PUD are adjacent to the east. The land which
borders the site to the west is Golden Gate High School and is zoned Rural
Agricultural. Immediately to the south of Magnolia Pond PUD is Interstate-75
and adjacent to the southern-boundary of the Right-of-Way are other land uses
which include Residential Single Family (RSF4), Sherwood Park PUD and
Saddlebrook Village PUD.
ZONING
N - Residential Single-family (RSF-3)
DESCRIPTION
single- family homes and a canal
S - Interstate 75
right-of-way
E - Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD; multi-family apartment buildings, and
Collier Boulevard Mixed-Use Commerce Park PUD; vacant
W - Rural Agriculture
Golden Gate High School
BAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23. 2010
Page 31 of 199
Page 2 oU
IV. PROJECT DESCRlPTION
Amend the existing Magnolia Pond PUD (approximately 42.05:1: acres) to add a 5-
acre parcel at the northeast corner of Magnolia Pond PUD without increasing the
permitted number of units of a maximum of 231 units. The project was zoned
from the Agricultural (A) zoning district to Planned Unit Development (PUD) on
June 9, 1998 to allow development of multi-family residential uses by Ordinance
98-49 (Exhibit A). The multi-residential use portion allows a maximum density of
5.49 units per acre and a maximum of 231 dwelling units. The Magnolia Pond
PUD document Section 3.4.C Open SpacelNatural Habitat Preserve Area
Requirements give details that a minimum of sixty (60) percent of open space
development shall be provided on-site as well as a minimum of twenty-five (25)
percent of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on-site shall be
retained. This requirement did not take into account the additional 5 acres that are
part of this rezone request.
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY
Future Land Use Element:
The subject property is designated Urban (Urban Mixed Use Dis1rict, Urban
Residential Subdistrict), and is within a residential density band, as identified on
the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. Relevant to this
petition, this Subdistrict permits residential development (variety of unit types) at
a base density of 4 dwelling units (DIU) per acre and a maximum of 16 dwelling
units per acre, subject to the Density Rating System provisions; and. recreation
and open space uses',
Review of the Density Rating System yields the site is eligible for a base density
of 4 DU/A. The subject property is located within a residential density band and is
eligible for a density bonus of up to 3 residential unitS per gross acre, yielding a
total eligible density of 7 DUI A. Therefore. the approved density of 4.91 units per
acre (a decrease from the existing approved density of 5.49 dula) is consistent
with the Future Land Use Element.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed PUD amendment can
be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element upon addressing the
items in the PUD as stated ahove.
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 32 of 199
Page 3 of8'
Conservation & Coastal Manae:ement Element
Objective 2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Growth Management Plan states ~ All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging
into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal. state, or local water quality
standards.
To accomplish that policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and
cumulative impacts of stormwater runoff, stonnwat.er systems should be designed
in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an
attempt is made to. enhance the timing. quantity. and quality of fresh water
(discharge) to the estuarine system.
This project is consistent with Policies 6.1 and 6.2 regarding the selection of
preserves. The property site contains 47.04 acres of which 41.10 acres is
considered native vegetation. The proposed native vegetation preserve of 10.28
acres fulfills the minimum requirement of 10.28 acres or 25% of the existing
native vegetation on site. A conservation easement dedicated to Collier County
shall be placed over the preserve.
As required by Policy 6.2.1, a wetland jurisdictional determination has been
conducted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The
property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. (EIS Exhibit 7).
As required by Policy 6.1.4, prohibited exotic vegetation shall be removed from
the site and maintained in perpetuity.
The EIS required by Policy 6.1.8 has been prepared and is supplied as part of the
review packet for this submittal.
As required by Policy 7.1.2, a listed species survey was conducted on the property
and is contained in the EIS (Exhibit 9).
As required by Policy 11.1.2, an archeological survey was conducted and is
included in the EIS (Exhibit 13). The project will not impact any known historic
or archeological sites. .
EAC Meoring
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 33 of 199
Page 4 ofB
VI. MAJOR ISSUES
Stormwater Manaf!ement
Section 8.06.03 0.2. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) states
"The surface water management aspects of any petition, that is or will be
reviewed and pennitted by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD),
are exempt from review by the EAC except to evaluate the criteria for allowing
treated stormwater to be discharged into Preserves as allowed in Section 3.05.07."
This project will not discharge stormwater into the preserves. The stormwater
will be discharged directly into the neighboring swales and canals.
The nortbermnost lake will be connected directly to the Main Golden Gate Canal
for stormwater management and for recIeational purposes. The southern portion
of the site discharges into a northbound swale that discharges directly into the
Main Golden Gate Canal
Magnolia Pond sits within the Main Golden Gate Canal Basin, and the allowable
discharge for that basin is 0.15 cfs per acre. The main Golden Gate Canal flows
directly east for about five miles over two weirs and into the Gordon River.
Environmental
Site Description
The project site consists of 41.10 acres of native vegetation according to the
defmition in the GMP and LDC and has been verified by staff on site. On site
native vegetation communities include pine flatwoods (23.27% acres). palmetto
(5.80 %acres), dry prairie (2.03% acres), Brazilian pepper (2.9h acres), temperate
hardwood (1.37% acres), drained cypress/pine/cabbage palm (8.19 '" acres), and
disturbed land (0.44 % acres).
Wetlands
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands.
Preservation Reauirements
A preserve location on the south half of the Magnolia Pond property south of
Magnolia Pond Drive) allows for a connection to the adjacent 15 acre upland
preserve on the Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commerce Center property. This
preserve location (despite the drainage easement along the eastem property line)
provides the best habitat and the largest contiguous preserve area possible. A
Preserve Management Plan has been provided in the EIS (Exhibit 8).
EAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 34 of 199
Page 5 ofB
Listed Snecies
The most recent listed species survey was conducted by Davidson Engineering,
Inc. during September and October of 2007. and is contained in the EIS. (Exhibit
9). Gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) individuals and gopher tortoise
burrows were documented on the property. There were 29 active, 9 inactive, and
23 abandoned gopher tortoise burrows. An estimated 27 gopher tortoises may
reside on the project site. As allowed by the Collier COIUlty Land Development
Code, the applicant intends to lDllllllge the small popu1ation of gopher tortoises
through offsite relocation to a recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand State
Forest or similar recipient site. A gopher tortoise relocation permit shall be
obtained and will be provided to Collier County staff during the first development
order and prior to any construction activities.
Since the project site does have slash pine habitat that could constitute Red.
Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis) foraging habitat, several tree
surveys have been completed on the property. No RCW cavities have ever been
identified on the property. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
has reviewed the project for impacts to RCW and states that the proposed project
will not increase adverse risk to the RCW (EIS Exhibit 11).
The project site lies outside of the USFWS current Florida panther (Puma
concolor coryl) Focus Area. The USFWS has reviewed the project for impacts to
Florida panthers (EIS Exhibit 11) and has determined that it will be unlikely that
panthers will utilize this site. Due to the urban development and minimal increase
in traffic at this site. no adverse effects or direct impacts to the panther are
expected.
Although there were no Big Cypress fox squirrels (BCFS) (Sciurus niger
avicennia) or Florida Black Bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) observed on
site, there is a potential for both species to occur on the site. A BCFS and Florida
Black Bear management plan shall be provided at the first development order.
The site does contain wild pine orchids (Tillandsia fasciculate) and Florida
Butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis), Prior to clearing the site will be re-
surveyed and any individuals observed during the survey that can be reasonably
reached will be relocated to the on-site preserve or as required by the LOC.
HAC Meeting
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23.2010
Page 35 of 199
Page 6 ofS
vn. RECOMMENDATIONS
..... ,",
Staffrecommcnds approval of Residential Planned Unit Development Rezone No:
PUDZ-2006-AR -10318 "Magnolia Pond PUD" with the following conditio~:
Stormwater Manae:ement
South Florida Water Management District permit modifications sba1! be obtained
PPOf to the next development order. .
EnVironmental
I) Provide Florida Black Bear and Big Cypress fox squirrel managenient plans as
part of the next development order. .
2) Provide a Gopher Tortoise relocation management planas part of the next
development order.
3) Provide a report to the Environmental Services staff on the results of the
relocation of the gopher tortoises within thirty days of relocation. The report
must contain the following infol'Dllltion: the number of burrows excavated, the
number of tortoises relocated, and the final relocation site.
EAe Meeting
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 36 of 199
Page 7 of8
PREPARED BY:
2+,( rJ~ C13
DAlE
STAN C NOW,
ENGINEERING RE W MANAGER
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
tJ1~ ~~.
CHRIS D' ARCO
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
g);;dy
DAlE
~";3'-' ,
MELISSA NE
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
~~?
BAC Meeting
Page 8of8
REVIEWED BY:
~i.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
k-7.kJL
STEVEN WILLIAMS
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY
APPROVED BY:
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 37 of 199
XtUJ-(y;
DATE
De Z4~
DATE
j..2d<l,
DATE
%ft!
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 38 of 199
COlLIEIUl(j(fN1"( GOVEltNMSliJl'
DEPT. OFZONIN~,& LANDClEvELOPMENTIU!VIEW
WWW.C6LLlERGO\i~IllET'
~ilOl)NO."fI ",OIi$I1$l:lOE bR:lY!!
NAPLES) FLPltlM 34.104
(:la.9) 4D'3~~1:l'O ~ (23~) 64~~68
_:-?~,l:iTII:YC'l~@:::~;~r;:r<J~:=".
~ll;~\1~~~i~~~i~~~~~~J::~~t~1 ::~~SL~~~~~I~~I_: ,,~,~~t'~~l'~fl~ldIii~!~
PETITION NQ tAlI
PROJECT NAME
PR,Q"ECT NUMBER
.,. " "
QA'fi.NOCE$Sep
ASSIGNED PLANNSR:
MAGNOLIA POND MPUD
PUDZ-A-2006-10318
submitted 1/12/10
NAME OF~I'I'UCA~T(~ MAGNOLlAPONIti HOLtllNGS~LLC, P:6;Wlii. illttESi(\ANDTERyL l"'IlRZESK~,
AND L4ND:t1l1ST 1B
AltiltiR:ES$ ~14r SSAHOl$eAVECITY
TELEPHONE' 239-134-5944 (:ELL #
E~MAjL AOtlRE5S' $CUtlsttS@AClL,(:6i'!\
NAPLES
FAX #'
STAtIl
"L Z'lP 34103'
NAME ()F MENT TIM HAJ'((io(:~. .6;lep
ADDRESS 3530 KRAFT Rb$\JITE'301 CITY IIlAl'LES stATE FL ZIP 34'11)5
TELEPHONE:# ~39)4.34.6Q6Q. (JELL # fAX# (239) 434"6Q84
E-MAIL ADD,R~S: tlM.@DAViD$OlliENGU\lEERIIIl~.C())M
NAME OFCQ.AGENTPA:TRICKWHlTE,ESQ.
ADDRi!SS 9t:l~ STJ~~tlAi!l1'tllltb FLOOR CrtY NAPLES S.TAri! FL 7;IP 3,.108
Tl;Li!P~()NE # ('ltS9) S!}:t.;2t!6a FAX'#(2391 593-2990
E.MA.IL ADDRESS. PWHITE@PQ/l.T~RWRIGIfF.COM
Appjj",""" Fo..PtibUc acoiing..FOt PUD R""..0i1IBI07,tev.2112i68
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 39 of 199
aU;WAltE mAr ~Q);"IEIt:C:P~i!!'I'Y H4$l,QI{~l$r.S$U~ATrpfli~. .~IiI!:iS'Y()lIJt~LP
AlX:01l:"'J\rG~Y ~J) !mSQ'U "rHAT'''QG ARE fill CO'r;I'U~NCE' wmt tl'iE~ IUl~Ol:A110N$.
~ '=~,,~1~~ > 'r'-~ ,-f: --7'~~';;7;~rn;::- t"~1"t1~~_ -:o..{ r.~TI:-:~~~~I~~--'---- ~
""_""'~>F.) .'~'- _, ~,- -~, . _ "~I.i~~Jv.~,l.:,\.< tJ ~k~J~..",~j;~i.--::-:^-~\"'-~t:!'.t'~~.N ~.t"''''"f "<o:~"'!.
~-.......,..~.~=-""".~~ ~'''''~''"'-~~':;'''''~~;:"--~~~
C:Oli1plet&the'fOllowin,9 fdr aU reg:fstlWed A$SbCta:tlbi'l($) thatdotdd.b~ aff~cted by this
petition.. FlrGYld. additional she'.ts If ti:ec;enary'" Il1formatiQlftan be 'fOund on thlii'
Boatd...o'fCountY Comml$$lonet'$,IlIt~b$'ite' athtt":llWliitW,(!(illlii~1lOY;.l1iitllndex.iiSbx?Dliae=774
l\IAMEOF HQMEOW\IIIlli' AssotiArlGll\b vEstClbli: FiJIltD'XV tm
MAIUN~ APDRES$ 3\)20 Jl~RTU!J, RD,:STllSQ,O cnw"~CK50NVIU.E sTAtll FLZIP .3n5:1. 8'2lli"
NAMIl:OF HOME'oW~Elt ASSOtIA'I'ION, COUiER CO.IJNTY 'StflOOL DISTRIC1'
MAILING ADDRESS 5"5 o.sC/!PL/(TRLCITY NAPLEUTATEFL;l;IP, 341'(19
NAM~,'.OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION. I'OR/!ST'J',ARK'MA5'l'ER PROPERTY OWl\lER5'ASSOCIATIOl'll Il\IC'
MAiLlN~ Ai)PRE$S 40~9 R~R~noNLI't<my tlJAPL6c$TA'I'E P.l ZI~ ;3411 &
NAM~'OF"'OMEOWNI:ItASSbeIATIOlib
MAI~ll\l~ ADDRess
en
STATE
ZIP
NAMliOP HOMEOWNElfASSOCIATIOl\l,
MAILING AnDRESS
CITY
$TATE'
;l;IP
Iii I..tti~1
a. Ifthjtpr~peI'lYiilPWJledfe.i> <siriipl..by 11I1INDIVIDUAL! fent!l1~ by the entirety,
teil'CIn~y .hi climlffitl1, lI.r lOillt t!l,nciJ'lty, 11$1 cdl I>artles witij .an 6Wflv:s/dp lfilerelrt CIS
well C1J lhe pet~l1tClflll 91. $\lcJllnlert!~, {U$llll~dlflo.i1til shell.51, l1ec(tSllaty},
Narii!iani,! 4ddresll
Pe:r~l1lall"l)fOwne!$h1p
TeIYf.H. (Ifill PllWjol $rze.ld,C1J Illl$hCInd<andWlfe III atl!RClbcy
'..,
1(1)%
.;\pplibu,on. F."Publl.lIeolin$.FoiPUD.J\"""'.Ol118l07.f'N'2i'IaIos
bylh. ..nIUIO..
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 40 of 199
b. Ifth'8propei'iy 'i'soowned bY'aCO;IlJ"QJl.AT/ON, "~lheoffh:ersand$tol:k~lilc!l>rs .m"
fhepllR'Q1l1all:liQI poc:k' oowned by-each..
Nortiil.cind,Md~~iI:
I"e.ril.!tnlall.e 0' Qlf/P8r,llihlp'
ilI,lI'.. $eii QWiijr1ililp.l!lCl!lb!,
c. Wlh./J pra~rtyl$, in lhe name ofll TRQ$TI!J:J n$tthebel'le.ficil!iie$l)fl~e'lrl1s"'wljh nil!
perc:enfa,ge, ofirtlete$t.
,.izitl. (lll'il'~lltl~ss'
!lllrcetilQQlI' !If OWrier-,lil(>:
ltlells/.j;'see O""'''eJl!!li", Exliibli
Il. I.fihe , '"rll;;."" thli ll'clJrte lifa G""'~RA:l; uMiTED pAttTNERSHitl' Hhanoni.
.....P.!>ILY' .,. ...............Q. . .....,1$ e
offlieg&rieraland}o,..llrrdiecipltrbll!;l's,
NQrile(lIlIlAd~rt!.$s
Percetilaiie of OWnllrsliip
I\Pplk.tlonf",i'ubll.Ji"",,iig For1'IJD'ltt'Zllno Oil~8101. rev2flV08
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Paae41 f199
8;, !f tl:\lit,js: ~C()~~Aet F(fR.I>O~H~~t with' an IndlVJelu.a1 or indlvidu.als/a
Corporcilion,.Trustee, 01' CJ P:actnel'$hlp., list the> ,nlllrie. of, lb. ,tQt'iti'adpii~hd.sei'~
below, ftlclOdlnjj'lile ilmcer.$" $tOi:1t8Iiliiii';s,bli'Olifidi!ri'~, o:'-pilltRil1'S.
~'Il\l.;;ri:ii:!A\fdrellS:'
"eRellla!J' IlfOwnershlp
Dide ci":d~ntratt. l
.._, .-'-. .,.
f. I. a:n,y ~"li'~Ill!~Yclal,llle. or (lci~'r!lcf I,r!!is illvolvCl' lldditional parties, list 011
IndIviduals. or officers, ifa. corporatlon,parinership, or trust.
Name ami. AddresiS'
g. PatesllblAclprqpertyacqu'll'd ~ lell$"fld 0 Tlfrn.;'ofleolle P~oP'rtlfts acqJ!'lred.
St~fi,'1fQ').\ 7/89, 9/Qr, '1IB(/h~r'd7
yrs,lmos.
Ap~ilollliOli' FIlt PDbllc lilllllriJ1~'FOI'l'tiU R='Oil!ai01.,....2112lOS
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 42 of 199
If,PllJI(.""1111i!J1l ~RJfbl'! J\l,"!ly;!~lil~ffd~i! folliiwln.ll:
Dede c1f~ption:
DateopJ!on tllrm'lnates: ': or
Anticipated dO$iilg 'dcite
h.Sh,,"Ie! !illychCi.1lges'of bWlle,,,liipor cll"POllS in'co)ltr.u",," (lit p,llrch.aseoccur
subsequenf tathe daie:ofaPp1icaflon,'b.uf pnorio fhe date .0Hheflnlil p.llbllc l!el;lrin9,
Itllr Ihe. respDl1.Idbllity of IhltC\ppliCilllJ, 'or t1g1lll1 OR his,. behalf,J" s.ilhmit
cil s!l'pplllmellt!rl .d'ii!cj\:ijlllreQf'iIlJll~f~"".
J)etidllldre~liIdesotlili:loD..ottbe.,JjI'Ollli~.Co'l!en!il1lv'tlt(!:iiiJl!lt'Clitil1nl (Jj<'sp.'tICliI..I,$ lillll.iiliiUl;IJiii o!foClP
o!l,sel1!1\llie'p~!ie" tfreqiiAist hi:,\,,*I~'di.li!l.!ieto mor.ll.thci.n.ll.M' 1Iillnin~ dljlil~,litclllde se~ratitle!!dl
descrlpllon fbrprllpllrtylnvolvei!Jneltch dillfrll!\'; AI'PlicllnfshllllslJbmli fbur(ill cllP1es of"Oretellt survey
t!tcjmpi!lte~ wJlbl1l t~e ii'i.lillih,< mo.rilhlii iliaxlriiiiful" fll40Q' sc<!ieiihe,lj)ilr.dtll !lo sil.atJ!:iepr'e,.
appli~lion,m"i1nll,. ..
NOT~,ihili;ip~Itc:l:i\:it Iii relip.c;n:il!t;ie fi>r..!lPplVil\jltb"e'1it~leilal.d~ClrlpJiondf ~\I~sliOil$ arise eOll~l!rrii"g
lhe.i8llc/i tlescrljtliol1,an .engineels cerlifieatio.noHealed su.rvey may':be "'qUiretl.
S'ectli!,ri'/1'.llwrishIFi/RcingIl34 /495,1 26tl
Lot, Illotk,S"j,dlvlsl\lil'
P,llltlklQk Pa!le #. Prop.eriy'I~D..#; O.029Z72Q.O'09,OQ297840llOZ, 002972400oq,
()l)~9t~80l)0>l, QQ29ji/iQqQQ3, ~96!lOl>>'ot.~'Q2*~7~Q02,QOit9i:iIiOQC!'2i 0,Q29672ltl09,()0297~O!ll106.
Males 8i.Jlourrds Desc'/J,plion, ,see aflachedbound..ry sutlley(il\is:wlSs Included:;lI'Jh.. I" revle~qJ<lckall.el
Size of'DroDertv:vlSriousrt. X.:vailllus.fi. ::: 1'01..1 Sq. FI,.
Atres47.05 ACi.es
Addtessll!eliel'al location of silbiectilI'Ollerty:~ tl" !t..MILE WEST OF- CR 951, NORTH AND WEST OF
THE lNT.aksBoTIO'N OF 951 ANDt-75
PU~ l),iStrlct (tDe; 2.Q,$.(5li)'
IgJR~"ideillilll
D Caltlln!'.c!.al
DComnll,l.l)I,Y' Fa~1jtlfl$
D Indllsllilli
Zonlti!!
fit :Oqnal
SR'oW
Leii:ld uSe
call,lSl
1-15
AppJf~ik1n 'pQ( ~~blic ~ril'l:g:For PUD.R~nc'Oll,1)~iQ7~..rcv'Vi21O_8
E:\!lib
WA
VfI.CAl1t, MjI<<!Pil\il~Ei.ji1l1l\la!y 'S~hql\1
,
(ioJdlln,:Gafe JoIlsb.Seboaf
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 43 of 199
Does ihe. QWner oftha sulij"d propeily ownproped>;eonlilJuous to ihe s.u.tijectpropertyli If so,.
lIWt ~ornpl...\\i<<I"I. dlo$<:fl'p;iol1C!f !lhtW~~tlguo"". lltoPIlIJY.. {if sJ'ia~e liiinadeijilllle;.C!l!l:leli '"l'
""pelt"" plli!il!..
Si!~i:!/Tl!Wi'lSliltlJ\!.i!iIlIl>> 1 I
Lob Iiloek:. 1Ilibdlvision.
pf .." Ii P . .... p..tIj.."""'......... I.Q.4I1i
'../ih;,Il',.!l!lIt1ti "","J
Meleslli Bounll.l).s~rlpilonl.
--~
.' ,,' ,rt.'l1""',- .'fI'.
Thi;'e1pp.li~alllirii. rll/4iJ.!ll!fIJfIlIl...:t:on..fflilrl'ihi/:Pl,ID'on4 All :iliiltliii di~dC\tth!)t1til:ap!.IJ)zonlllil
dbtrld(~}.
Prlis.tlt'hi" lIrth..'PtJ1Jl"~ Val1i:l1ll
P~QPC!..lI 1,1.. (or. rlllllle;lilu..-s} alt~. Pl:*~Y.;;Il.~ill.lltl!i1
OilllhlQlFlUD Jila.me;.l\!IagnoliaPonil PIJDOrdlllllni:eNv.,PRD. 98-49'
. . . . ~ " . ".~ [,' - -,<-, ,~,<
I~,__ -.:.,. '. ------ , , " {j,~~"" i~~1
Pursuant to $Sellon tOAltl~l~ofih.CoIII.r dot/Illy kllnd D.,velopntent. .Code, staff'. a!ialy.1s and
r........rilm. .'"'at'... "10' t1.11. 1l1anriin'. 'do-mml$-'Qil' /i'dth.-. l'ttllinlng C:'''!rtm''--''l>JI'iliiOilii'i'l\>nilQli n to the
~... . I' . Ill." . "... . ...Il ... .... .. , . II .. ... .11. ."'" ..".. ...0..
8llctrd. of ClluntyComrillssil)n\>is. sbltllb.E!:baslld .upvn 'l:onlilderatlon onhe.applicable- enterlll no.led below,
Prpvlll.,1J n/JWQllvi!' slllt.menti!e;,ctli>lrrg- Ibii ~.Jl'~"e, reltuel;lWltb s\le~lf/l; ",'."lice- 10 the ctrileli!:i noted
bel!lw,ln~ll1de1JiW ~(fck"p l\'l(ft~Itl.III'tu:ldd~lIm~I#I!llll!iiu~port llft.\le ,equel;f.
PUDRez<rrteC"..sldiotati.oM ilDCSecti"h 10.02.,1 :un
1. The.i\l]fQbUitI' Qfthellrioo fl).ftbelY/!el@'1"alt~/llfde"'lcipili\>illptoP!l.ed..ln lelilllan.lit
phylilail cl1arader1s.ll'cs. of.1beland,'surrounding..ctreai, iral'ffc.:cand,aeeessi'drlllnllge',:SIlWer, waier.
and otlW ot!lltl'es.
lh.1~ P..tlt!oh~e",ics)illltl\1lnf~l~ r~.~ellJ)lll"'Qri'nlil'<WllPj;(tll#l1l!'il!::lY: 4t2.PFr""'\lq41n!:iu<l~
ll$:OIiI~lf(\'!I;;fcehf pj;jrcE!rwliJjlluflnaall$ii\,Q.t~ j?llr'ffiltfe.di1vii1!;i;r Of Wlll"tbe (idlci@ht
~":::;: ::::11~t~~~ter~~~i;~{~c)\:~~h.::;':~~~'i;,::I, the
~omF'Qsed of !WQmlxed 1)se Pl;lDs... Tbi;\$tibjeel prQperty Is wI/11m ;an area 01 CollIer
Cc>unty wbh avallal>ie-pubUc'ufllilles andi!l<lstiilgtrGmspolatlbn'aeeess. !kI.edupo~tl1&
p,opo~1l cl&velopl)\e~t $tg!1d<ltds,.1bEiPl..lP.'ls epmpgtlblli'fWI1h nelghl:!9l;lng Ih$fIMIQhal,
Appt(bfttlonFor Public. Hea:rlng,~or.POb 'It(@ne{l.l1JiJft)'~ tt:V'1112J08.
r~\deJilltil,Q~d j:"'Q~llS,,"!l ~~,Tlie. pio.ji.p,s1!d. PlJPA ,,,,,on,, WlU 'IQ~j;>l.y wilh <:i.ll q\iff.tijo.
reqalremeills set 'forth'.ln the Gome,c:oti~Land OeveIClpment'Cocfe.{COC).
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23. 2010
Page 44 of 199
2. Adel1\iiil;V ", eVidenceo',ulilfled 1l0nltoFlllld',1I01illbili/1'ilfuM( :prol''OsedllllreemenlS\ cOribllllti elIt
lither '''i'' ..- . t'f'Ir'!ffiIriilmjmiif~,ilt9ii. ",if iill\j'ii,...."L '.\br!'-.lIiIt"'" . . ... , . teleit"t...
.... . n9,"'J1l"".",~ ".. II..,. .. ...,!,If, .. . .ifP.. _".""",IGll _..,)'... ...IYIJ!!!.Y.....,."
arransem.nh;W I'rD~bil~il~tQ;:b.llleditrcq(;tbe,c!lnflnlllDs~perCitloiicGnd.miihiten"n~e of',.II.h.
!!reCl$gM'l.l!~lIlll..s'th"t.re rloBo lle. prllV!~!ll! ~rmlllnt<<li!e'" atplillil. el<pllrl$&. ~incfltlg&lirld
iii~lit,"iirld.iifil!"l! ofthlsf}'Pli ~bijil.lt~mtill..IiI\I)fl'iftlit~ns\JIili1i'\til Wlt~ t~CililtifY altOtlie'f.
111.. 1C!r\d)~ ownlid ;!nd 'i<>n!t.\>Ue'd by t\:Jll,~.t!tJbl!llt' AJ)ye.t>r\ \\l'lil's,wlllii'n,thl>p'rljlli(;ldnr:l"tiJnll
aUpreserveoreas, will be;;ClWned (ind mglnfainedby1tie Owne,,*.a !iPrne owne.is'ailSQcl'oIlDn.
3. CDn'~tJrilty~'theprDP?"d.I'U.D Withthi>1i!Ql:tI$!.l>"i,ectlit~sri~dfJllh:ii>$I'.ffhe l!roWfh .
mallri"gement Filarr.(ThlsJs tolnclUde'lderltlfyll1.ll WhllfSUJi,odlstnct, poller Dr otherprovtslon
,. allilWslh" t!iql!l!.l>tedus!ls/~e"lilty. ri"ilcifllay IQip(a.llibI9[IIi.liltes,.il!il ",II IIillllliri elt eq.li:dffl.olls:"Uhllf
Su&,odis/iicti pDllcy Dr other prD>!i''',".)
The PUP!>im..!I(ldlmlnl l~ ~ililsJSlil!ritW1i!11f1!it CPl!i<lr Cqilli:lY<i>i'l>wth,Mghrig\;\R'!iOPt p(gn IQMPI'l!ii'",ilglJ,
\11e dpplleatloA 'Of the de.veIC!!lll1enhiandotri!s;cClntalneClln iIlls P1J[); ,TlieJlPUD rezone. i. consislent
vtillt.tli.. fonl>w\il{l sp,eclflli.po!iClesriild cl;!i~ve.$i
Tlie:sub:ject properly:lsw1thln the Mbc&d,UseUrl'>an ilesklllnii<il SVbcllsti'itll'<l.NbeUrban'
PesiiW~tlQn dsiilesc:rJb.~ qndlp/Stlttelif'n tb:eF.)iwr,e ~l:i.illl iJ~ EJeilieilli::l/iP FuW'lilali:d tile Mtjp
r"spec/lvElly. This SubdistrIct prlnc1p'ally pJIC!ws r"sl'aEln.tlcd develC!pmenl..
PoHd1.'5.4. 'fhe. ptp.pDsiocj develC!)>rilent Is c.bi1\p,i:!tlbl"...Ith. anll c'?riipiirriio!1t"F:Y tl> sijrrOUllcU6g land
uses:ln Ih",llo thesC!uilds':o ,slrn(l"r sIMI!I~,'fa.milyr~sld~n:l1dl c<>mmunJly.1heprC!pos~d I'UOA
.rez!>M:e P"*fMt1IM"O!1~lttl!n~y of ~pil1\:>ptll!1.1!!. ~,il;"Th"p.qp"s"d !l~vl!l"p.ment wlll provtd...
CldequliItebvfferlng cis ~"he LPC :an!:! GMi>.
4. Th"intemllllClnd eXlernrileDmpllltlbilliyolpro/)o'Sed uses, whi.ch conditiDnsmaylnc/llde
reslri~i.!iitiiOillocllf1oil ",fimprqv."menls, ri!;$.ltli:llo,1S Cin ,<!~lgn, pnd blitferiiilll!nll scree/llng
r.e-c:lLiirem~nts.
';'~'."'...":D" "I'll!) l'l>'h1ilesWtth t~, in!' .In .r.....lltr.in. ts s"tf<irtbln the CCllller.... CQIj "'...' lbnd
"........!lP~". P.., . "". ~. ~Iil "'I.ll.. en, ." .... . ..,.11" .
Development CD~. Th":proppsedPUP alsD liinlls..t!le number-of resfdentli:ll.u.nlts to a maXlinumDf
:4ilJ, loli I;m1t"'Il!lil furth'lr ll)lilgClIeI'<lny'pbteWo, Cl'!,l!r.d!!.ve.!D,pmenl'df th.e. pt!'lFl$'jj! CIi1d tqhe
ili1medICltear=..
5. Thellde'lOotcy .0,' ".Cl"'e .open spaWcirecis in ..!CIsten.;e and ciSprllj>.Qsed fo .serVe Ihe deveJcoprhi>llt.
Th'l'.su!:il.e.;t prpperty 1'Cl/rrent1y uJJ.d"velppe;d.1'Iie_ prD)>Qs~pr"leCl wIII.niwi,tcir "x~eed the
requlred.op"n space forCln RPUD.
6. 'l'hiHlnjing .0, $.qllMclj,~f d"v.llipment fOl"tbepuipose Of!UiSllring the adeq!laev lif a:Vrillcible
Impro"emerils rilld facllitie$, both public lirld privcite.
The pfojioCl wlIll'Omply with the C9unty Apeq\Jot" Pobiic PClellltle, prdlnc;lnPi!!. No.capaclty IS$V""
,are Known at thts time.- .
7. TIledblllf}' ,ofthe'subje.c/ p.operty. and .0' surrollndin!! areas tD Clccommodoleexpunslon.
Apptfcatiott,Po-r'l'!iJ'bl1c 'He"lI:ring'_ ForPUD'ReZOi1c 0.1/1-8/01; rev 2112108'-
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 45 of 199
tlpJ:l11l fuc!!xp.PnsIOD 1;;irpt.iI (ipnsld:8i,;,t!li>II'os !hI!' ptOp.oled .PUP wlJl fuUyutlllz!!. t~epotti"" of !he
~bl"Qi'p'C)P"erirlhat ls"ell.Qlble'foc1"e%Olilil.Q.
8. COnf.mplty Wijh"'UI).egp'atllln"S;ilt~~ /I, ci".rf~IiIIl'i!l~!fI~"I!Ql]~i!f"~r;'f!.tell\llatllm~liilll~
.. . I "1.... . . 'b" s. . if"'n' ."il............,.., 'n'.ill""" .......li'i.....f1...'llln.... ."t. ]'.$11....' .le me' eflng". '1>. Jle
P.!#I.!l~ IIr.~qSil,. .'...10"... ,'!I......".......Cl. .. . ._ ,.11"", ., ....... "".... ~,. .". "". Ii .... pI!
purpo&esfo II dl>\!..... at. least equlvGlent llllJierr:ilappllcalion of&uchre.9platiom;.
Th!!~pos.liI PUP I\Qrjri;>j)i!a wJth i1l! app.Uq:I1:iI~.ij,QJlllltllm~ slltf,liiilll lij ~.t:;!:\llfj;ir€:(lti/Jry.lGInd
Development C"dsf~r 0 .esldentkll devel~merit.:No d\!f~Ii1tr_.6;om .th.. Lti'C'tlre.t'equem.:d.
'D~ ll......iil,lfonst1 th,,, l$qntil t. !l:;g~ll\<pr~~: f\'9!!f<!!of~r4n'g ~,,:I! r~qff~~" ~er,tj)1j;1IfY
~iiiijJjM\1fW 1l1ii~.:tl~p.ll.f..cU,ll.ch ~",l;!1!lijIi.Y;;~m\;y.w.lsh t.c> i;onICl!ltthi>>;diit(;;Qr p'rll~rl~o.W.iierHisso,dCllfon;
1n l'be'orea Tor'WhlC/lil!,s use Is being; reqyesled lIT order.to',.ascettafn,whe!her '"rnl1li'1he r.eqllestls.'alTecle,j:
~'Y'~SjJ!ill: dM:~ t~tlrtlltj!>llfi..
Pre"iOu&lllndClSllpeililonsanlhe,slIbfel!t'lnaJ1ep:fy. Tbyour l<ndwt"dllli!;has a publie,IIeortirg blllen held
'.. obi" ' ..........,wllh'~ tbl" ". '1' 0 ":.101 .,(;
'(Ill "" . PfqP....,..,. ...., . Ill. Cl~. .~.. .. '~'.~".
fha,what wasth.ena1ure of''1hal'heatlhJ''
NOTICE,.
this applicO'l'lcm 'Hllloe considered "open'" wlien .ffie delel'll1lnollOn 'of "sufflblency" has .DeeR' made and
\be appllcaflon Is QS&lgAedapellfloli pl'DceSsln0n.iJmber. The opplfaallon will be considered "c!osed"
Whed. '.Ml.' pelltji!ll)er W~liq~...W" t1ll;lllr~~~gtkirt thtq\l~ii written IiPtleQ,Cit....,.",ses to Sii~IY neaessd~
Into1m'dfie'il' td J::l:i1jttnlle pfo~.lnd or dthetWl~dtljVSJy. DllrSUl!i' lharemntn!;l f(,1" tlflE'ribd lllf. slle/tit
I!l.llll.ihl. An QPpllbptfon deemed "closed" wl11 'nOf reeel\le TQ!'fl,.el' p~OCll$Slrfg ql'let tlri l:lpp)I<:Clflor(
"clased" thrau.Ii" fnQctlvltyshon loa deemed wlfhdrmvm. An Qppllcatlon deemed "closed" may be reo
opene.d. bt ~ijbrjrltting tI new l'ippilCdtlon, iepClymenf of all application fees arid granllng of a
detEirmtnaf!ClIl Qf"suf.f.1Cii;riCij". Ftli'fher j~\I(ew of tb"pr<>Tect will be subject to- tket)jenC(fherif codE".
(We Ser;tJon l'O.63;~,Q.)
Ajlpli_.FOr'l'ulilic.Hearing .Fllt'I'UD:RewncolimOJ,rev1JI.Z/Og
DE
r?^;<!9fr9~t:f
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 46 of 199
MAGNOLIA POND PUD DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
1. Teryl H. Brzeski is the trustee ofLand Trust IB dated September 11, 2001. Our
records reflect the Trust owns Parcel 9, 34-49-28 E 112 ofNW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF NW
1/45 Acres PID # 296800001. According to the tax returns. the ownership of the
beneficial interests are as fu lIows:
a. Teryl H. Brzeski
b. Gabriel Beyrent
c. Nora S. Beyrent
d. Garrett FX Beyrent
53.0435162%
26.4130221%
18.5869415%
1.9565202%
2. Magnolia Pond Holdings LLC was transferred Parcels 8, 20, 21, 33, 38, 39, 41, and
114. The Manager is Teryl H. Brzeski. The ownership is as fullows:
a. Teryl H. Brzeski, Gabriel Beyrent and Nora Beyrent
as Trustees of the Garrett FX Beyrent Trust Dated July 15, 2002 50%
b. Gabriel Beyrent and Nora Sha:1pe Beyrent as Trustees
of the Beyrent 2005 Descendants Trust Dated April 28, 2005 25%
c. Teryl H. Brzeski as Trustee ofthe Beyrent 2005
Dynasty Trust Dated April 28, 2005 25%
D~~~u~~n
JAN _ 5 2010 U
::.I
MagnoHa Pond PUDA: DisclosufC (,f Interesl
www.davidsoncnginecl.ing.com
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 47 of 199
-'-,'--,
".':.',"'.:".;'
. '.. ". ..',"
... ...;'...'.....
'AFFIDAVIT>"
........:,..;"
".". <
...:.....,
. . . ., -.: -- '. , - '- -:,'. , ~.', ' -.: . >
::-:-:;<,-'.'::"t
;.:'1
":,::.\":.,::.:
".,.'.,
:'''"',.-":-,"
I, TeNI H. 81'%eskl. as Trust_. land Trust 1 B u/t/d 09/11/01. being first duly sworn,
depose and say that I am the owner of the property described herein and which Is the
subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions In this
application, Including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other
supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and
true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the Information requested
on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form,
whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will
not be advertIsed until this application Is deemed complete, and all required Information
has been submitted.
As property owner I further authorize Tim Hancock of Davidson Enalneerina. Inc. and/or
Patrick Whit" of Porter Wrlaht Morris & Arthur. llP to act as my representative In any
matters regarding this Petition.
,'ffi~H:~~ (M~
Slgnatu Property Ow r
Tervl H. Btzeski. as Trustee of the land Trust 18. under trust dated Seatember 11. 2001
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this
2QQ2, by . B n Tru
known to me or has produced
day of ~
11 who Is personally
as Identification.
State of Flo~~.
County of 0 ~ QI
I"-"',~.
i~"'rt\. ~Ul{a_.ry Pub~c State of Florida
. ~ ,1eMIG8 Ramos
~ i; ,; My Commission 00789561
'1'J;.0J'''~ Expjres 0611812012
c)~\~~,
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 48 of 199
Ii
'-..'
".,':".
.. , 'd.AJ=FIDAvIT<
'.,-,',"--,'
. ,,"',,',
-::"::~ ",: '<.:i ,: "",,: ~",
:..'.,"
.,'.'.'.,.,....,..,,,..
. "..;"
>;<"":",;::.',:
Cil
We, Terri H. Brzeskl Individuallv as ~Ife. and Pawel Brzeskl. indivlduallv as husband
being first duly swam, depose and say that we are the owners of the property described
herein and which Is the sublect matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the
questions In this appncatlon, including the disclosure of interest Information, all sketches,
data, and other supplementary matter attached to and mdde a part of this application,
are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We understand that the
Information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the
content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered.
Public hearings will not be advertised until this application Is deemed complete, and all
required information has been submitted.
As property owner We fur1her authorize TIm Hancock of Davidson Enaineerina.lnc.
onel/or Patrick White of Porter Wrlaht Morris & Ar1hur. LLP to act as our representative In
any matters regarding this Petition.
\.1 ~~ ~i21!t
signa Prope wner
~~~
Signature of Property Owner
Tervl Brzeski
Typed or Printed Nome of Owner
Pawel Brzeskl
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~\:iu'
1QQ2, by Tervl H. Brzeskl indivlduallv as wife. and Pawel Brzeskl. Indlviduallv as husband
who Is personally known to me or has produced as
identification.
State of FloCld~ (
County of N ~~
u lic - State of Florida)
(i;
.,'"
Notary Public Slate of Florida
.Jessie. ~amos
My Commission 00189561
Explre805l1812012
c y.~\CO ~l9ll\~
(Print, Type, or Stamp Convnlssioned
Name of Notary Public)
...........~.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 49 of 199
I
..',0 "",",", _.
.:.:.:...:.:....-.,;.......
.' '. .....
,", ....,...
..... .,.>,iAFFIDAVIT'
,....
I
....';
I, Tervl H. Brzeskl. Manaaer of Maanolia Pond. LtC. being first duly sworn, depose and
say that 1 am the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter
of the proposed hearinlll that all the answers to the qlle$tions in this application, Including
the disclosure of Interest Information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter
attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I understand that the information requested on this application
must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer
generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised
lRItil this application Is deemed complete, and all required informatioJl has been
submitted.
As property owner 1 further authorize TIm Hancock of Davidson Enqlneerina.lnc. and/or
Patrick White of Porter WriQht Morris & Arthur. LLP to oct as my representative In any
matters regarding this Petition.
2~~~~~',l7}a4}r
Tervl Brzeskl. Manaaer of Maanolia Pond. LLC
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~
lQQ2, by Terri H. 8rzeskl. Manaaer of Maanolia Pond. LLC. who is personally known to
me or has produced as identification.
State of FIO~~
County of ~\ \\ei'
()O
ublic - State of Florida)
p ,". . .
'>> r~i\ 'jotol\' PUblic Stale 0/ FIOlj"
. . .fea8ics RemD$ ...a
':l.' "" 11 My Commiso'
l ~o;"" E'pi"'0Sl1a:,~f789S6f
<:"'t~\\to.. ~
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 50 of 199
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of
property commonly known as Ma2l10lia Pond PUD and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for PUD AMENDMENT planned unit
development (RPUD) zoning. We hereby designate TERYL H. BRZESKI legal representative thereof. as
the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all
owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority
includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of
applications, plans, surveys. and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These
representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time
as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in th~ pursuit of development
of the project:
I, The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all
conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection
with the planned unit development rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions,
safeguards. and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is
subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is
delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements.
conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a
violation of the Land Development Code.
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants
and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all
development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and
conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the
terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary
to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits. certificates, or licenses to occupy or use
any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until
the project is brought into compliance with all terms. conditions and safeguards of the planned unit
development.
Owner
o
I
Printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER) \,\-\r- 0.. b. ,-...\-
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subsc~ibed before me this * day of ~,200_ by
\~ \1\\ ~\ 't es.\.\ who is personally known to me or has produced
,
.'_00 ~ ~
~~~.~<=:~~ 0 P lip ~. .\-~ YJn
~.i~i~ Ex~: Mar 04, 2008 (Name typed, printed or stamped)
'~OI~.., Bonded '\bnl
"",,,,,\\\,,, "t1anticBondingCo.,1nc. (Serial Number, ifany)
PtnoA-2006-AJR-I0318
PROJECT #19990108
DATE: 8/16106
MELISSA ZONE
",'
\.-"\
t") ;. ...r
r)
~
Agenda Item No. 17 A
3572527 OR: ~'r4feYlGat~i56
RBCORDID in O!lICIAL RlCORDS of COLLIBR CODIfY lL
03/09/2005 at 11:31AK OVIGHf I. BROCK, CLBRK '
RBC liB 41.00
DOC-.70 .70
WARRANTY DEED
(Statutory Form - Section 689.02 F.S.)
Retn:
POiLIR rllI'n IT At
~811 PILICA! BA! BLVD 1600
, BAPLIS 1L 34108
Preoaration ofJns1J:ument Onlv Without Ooinion
This instnnnent was prepared by:
Andrew J. Krause, Esquire
Fowler White Boggs Banker P.A.
5811 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 600
Naples, Florida 34108
(239) 598-1221
THIS INDENTURE, made this "7'f;( day of 'Yn.a.t..~ . 2ooS,
between TERYL H. BRZESKI, as Trustee of the GARRETT F. X. BEYRENT TRUST DATED
JULY 5, 2002, of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, and GARRETI F. X.
BEYRENT, a single person, whose post office address is 506 Gordonia Road, Naples, FL 34108,
tee'" .
gran .
WITNESSETH. that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOlLARS
($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee,
the receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee,
and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in
Collier County, Florida, to wit:.
(SEE ATIACHED EXHIBIT "A'')
Subject to easements, restrictions, reservations common to the subdivision and taxes
for the current year and subsequent years.
Subject property is vacant, unimproved property and has never assumed the
character of a homestead.
This conveyance is a transfer from the grantee's revocable trust to the grantee as a
beneficiary of such trust and therefore only minimum documentary stamps are
required.
Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
1
Agenda Item No. 17A'
OR: 3~11622:Ufm
'"
"Grantor" and "grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and
year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in our presence:
C. t.J\te~
~~~~~~I~~D~~'
GARRETT F. X. BBYRENT TRUST I - .
DATED JULY 5, 2002
STATBOFFLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
Before me, a Notary Public, the foregoing instrument was acknowledged this 'fy..;., day of
111 oJ" (I h .. 2005, by TERYL H. BRZESKI, as Trustee of the GARRETT F. X.
BBYRBNT TRUST DATED JULYS, 2002, who p-1B personally known to me or who 0 has
produced a driver license as identification, and who did not take an oath.
n~'1~~O'(J
Notary Public ([ ,-'
State of Florida
My Commission Expires: $1f:;t':X';:€~~ (A N~cy Feeley
! . { H ~lDlIlIon # DD3S34.20
. ~1""';;'~ Expire,: ocr. 22, Z008
'I' 9F 1\\)',.. D-nd d TL
'It"lI,l" A I" IN e j WlJ
t ufie BotldiJ:lrCo., IDe.
(Printed, typed or stamped commissioned name ofNOlaly Public)
#1694144vl
2
A,!jlenda Item No. 17 A
OR: 3Jn~~lP~g
EXBIBlT"A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AS TO PARCEL 8:
The West Yz of the Northeast ~ of the Southeast ~ of the Northwest ~ in Section 34, Township 49
south, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Property LD. #00296760002
AS TO PARCEL 20:
The East Yz of the Southeast ~ of the Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~ of Section 34, Township 49
South, Range 26 East, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Property J.D. #00297240000
AS TO PARCEL 21:
The East Yz of the Northeast ~ of the Southeast Y. of the Northwest ~ and the Southeast ~ of the
Southeast ~ of the Northwest ~ of Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, together with
all the oil, gas and mineral rights now owned by the Grantor amount to not less than 25%.
LESS a portion ofthc S.E. ~ of the S.E. ~ of the N.W. ~ of Section 34, Township 49 South, Range
26 East, CoIIler Cowty, Florida being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCE at the'Northeast comer of the N.W. ~ of Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26
East; run thence, South 0020'07" East along the East line of the Northwest ~ of said Section 34, a
distance of 2,324.86 feet for the POINT OF BEGINNING: thence North 74009'17" West, a distance
of 323.86 feet to a point: thence, North 73000'33" West, a distance of 364.,53 feet; thence South
0019'13" East, a distance of355.7I feet to a point ofa ClU'Ve concave Southwesterly; thence, from a
tangent bearing of South 76001'14" East, run southeasterly along said curve having a radius of
11,297.16 feet, thrpugh an angle 0[3000'41" an arc distance of593.78 feet to the end of said curve;
thence, South 73000'23" East a distance of 92.07 feet; thence, North OOZO'07" West along the East
line of the N.W. ~ of Section 34, a distance of346.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 5.231 acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO: a 50 foot mutual right-of-way easement extending 25 feet on either side of all
section lands including quarter and qUarter quarter section lines, which easement is for the use and
benefit of the adjacent property owners.
LESS AND EXCEPT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN QUIT-CLAIM DEED RECORDED IN
O.R. BOOK 2323, PAGE 508, OF THE PUBIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. .
Property LD. #00297280002
OR: ~~~&\~ {f~~
pijt~54 d;~a9
AS TO PARCELS 33 & 38:
The West Y. of the East Y. of the Northeast Y. of the Northwest Yo of Section 34, Township 49
South, Range 26 East, together with all the oil, gas. and mineral rights now owned by the Grantor,
amounting to not less than 25%.
SUBJECT TO: a 50 foot mutual right-of-way easement extending 2S feet on either side of all
section lands including quarter and quarter quarter section lines, which ~ement is for the use and
benefit of the adjacent property owners. '
Property I.D. #00297720009
AS TO PARCEL 39:
The East Y. of the Northeast Y. of the Southwest Y. of the Northwest Yo of Section 34, Township 49
South. Range 26 East, together with all the oil, gas and mineral rights now -owned by the Grantor
amounting to not less than 25%, less and except the parcel set forth in that certain Stipulated Final
Judgment recorded in O.R. Book 994, Pages 1760-1763, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida.
SUBfficr TO: a 50 foot mutual right-of-way easement extending 25 feet on either side of all
. section lands including quarter and quarter quarter section lines. which easement is for the use and
benefit of the adjacent property owners.
Property LD. #00297880004
AS TO PARCEL 41:
The West Y. of the Northwest Yo of the Southeast Y. of the Northwest Yo of Section 34, Township 49
South, Range 26 East, less and except the lands described in Official Record Book 1048, Pages 521-
523, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Property I.D. #00298000003
AS TO PARCEL 114:
That part of the S Y. of the NW Yo of Section 34, Township 49 South. Range 26 Basi in Collier
County, Florida, being more particularly descn'bed as follows:
Commence at the center of said Section 34, thence run N 16059'37" E a distance of 162.00 feet;
thence N 73000'33" W a distance of 893.75 feet; thence N 16059'27" E a distance of 162.00 feet to
the POJNT OF BEGINNlNG; and the beginning of a curve concave Southwesterly and having a
chord bearing of N 73037'19" W; thence Northwesterly along said curve having a radius of
11,621.16 feet througIi an angle of! 013'41", an arc distance of 249. 10 feet to the end of said curve;
thence N 88028'35" E a distance of 336.37 feet; thence S 0"19'13" E a distance of 109.09 feet;
thence N 73000'33" W a distance of 102.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations, conditions and easements of record and utilities remaining
in place and in use, if any. This property cannot be used for outdoor advertising purposes.
2
*** OR: 3'~~~~~;1**
Page 55 of 199
RESERVING unto the State of Florida Department of Transportation an rights of ingress, egress.
light, air, and view between the above described property and the road named as follows:
State'Road 93 (1-75); along the following described line:
Commence at the center of said Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East; thence mn N
16059'37n E a distance of 162.00 feet; thence N 73"00'33n W a distance of &93.75 feet; thence N
16059'27n E a distance of 152.00 feet; thence S 73ooo'33n E a distance of 102.33 feet to the
beginning of the herein described Limited Access Line; thence N 73ooo'33n W a distance of 102.33
feet to thebeginni"8 of a curve concave Southwesterly and having a chord bearing ofN 73037' 19n
W; thence Northwesterly along said curve having a radius of 11,621.16 feet, through an angle of
1013'41" an arc distance of 249.10 feet to.the end of said curve and the END of said described
Limited Access Une.
Property LD. #00297280002
3
__......Ilf.
_ A. _. .."u-
IZUB. I'DaI a 1IDCD .
1000 iIIliaUIIi Ia11 _1:1I, lI\Iio 101
Htplu. 1'10_ JUOI
.....IID N_ ._ A1:taobecl .....ibi 1: "
....1111>1,
_n11N,
Agenda Item N 17A
3017228 OR: 3076 PG: Ullt1uary 23,2010
UCOIDlIIII ODICUI UlIIIIf of cmm _fiJe 56 f 199
II/It/1m 11111111I _ I. IlOCl, a.w
IlIII 110.01
DC m IS."
1It'.lI .11
. .
1111.
Inlnlllllll
1ID11_1l1111
..,111110 IlIOl
Warranty Deed
TWo........... ModeIhi&/.5" """.r oJ\Ily .2002 A.Il.. Betw_
QlIUI'If F.X. ~. . .iDV1..... &Dll uan. S. _U. ._:Lad
-
or ... ~ or COU.... ,SUIe or I'1orida . ......1.... ...
\'IIIn S. _1Ja, _7ft. 1III'ftal, ..... -... ~_. CO-,........ oE
t:ha llaIIUft F.X. _._t ~. ~ -'U2.f . 2002 ..
__~: SU? 8aloho".. ,,"'_, Bapla., I'L
or lilt CouoIY of Collialt:
,
SII~" Florida
. ..........
W~ .......CIIWI1'ixts........_fl .....,.......,
-----------------------~ DOLLIB8 (.10)----------------------- ~
II'ld 0IIlct pIOII ... WIIbk fillll ~ 11 10 0lAN'RHllI Ie .... ptld II)' ORAHTBB. .- mdpl ....., II ..., a~ 1 ~ , line
__......"....""'lIIWm!1l...ClIlANTEII'S __..._-...____
1""""boilIiIl"'CouoIYof ColU." _., Plodda' "o0?I:
(Ia &rDC1IIIII IIZIllSr.r
B.~.a1: lID ..._b.
aabcIidat.... an" tan. 10
..,_ .........q. 18
t:ha "".-_.. oE
**'!:be 1fI:1l._. .bel
__, nl1, 1....
lwIlot:IuIaau. ...1_,
dlipoa. oE t:ha ...&1 P
IaDUoa .It. 0'71 o' t:ha
=~--D = th.
...aqaaot JOIIlElO.
&Dll baa __ .._
q. lID pr:ol:llDt,
p, aD".",
i.. to --va &Dll
11:, :I." ......._ ...."il
"".._ doloonlly ""'" """'" ...lllleil ooJd...........m _... _......1..... cia... 01011.......-.
ID W1_Whnor,... _ --.........................,...1'0'..........-
~..........doll\oe... ..o..p......., / /
_.~ _ "Y.J<
'._'" a~a. 11
pdDt _l./'f'\..Ji'&J .:r. Kt-....C'
~~~
pJ:illt _','IlI<lIlR..'l ::no.NeTAfllN~
STATE 011 I'1Ddda
COU1'lTY or Co1Ue&, ./
na ....... _ _ _wWpoI_ ...... ", S .., .r My ,2002 ."
QIDIft F.X. urJlIIlft. a aiDQ'l. .... &Dll ftRYL S. DDSU, . -=iatl
..::m.....ur.....to.....w:producedlbafr /"
.._-
(SoaO
lMI!
~~~
',,11l I 'I :MNE. "T'A1\I1IlE.'OL
Hotuy io L'
....C-__,...,..1\ 11l\ux>:!'
2471'"
______.,.......,ar-,...1111l1 _"'~.sm hl!llfLVlD-l
..
OR: 3076 p~.~e; 2~~2b~ ~
Page 57 of 199
EXHIBlT"A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AS TO PARCEL II ,
The Watli of tho NonhtoUll/4oftho SolIIbeut 1/4 of tho NorIhwesII141DSecdon 34.
TOWIlIhlp 49 1OUlh, IWlp 261!ul, Collier County, FIorlda.
Properly J.D. MI8296?6OOO2
AS TO PARCEL 281
The But '" of1lle Sou1lleasll/4 of1lle Nortbeut 1/4 oflbe NIlIlhwe8t 1/4 ofSeclion 34.
TOWIlIhlp 49 South, Renae 26 BasI, ......11e ~ of Collier COIIIl\)'. FlorIda.
I'ropeI:ty LD. flI02m4011OO
AS TO PARCEL 211
The But '" oflbe NortheasIII4 oflbe SoIIIheut 114 of the NIlIlhwe8t Il4l1lc1lhe SolIIbeut 1/4
oflbe 1OU1heuI1I4 oflbe No~ 1f4 oCSecliOll34. TOWIIIhip 49 South. R8np 26 East.
toselher with ell the ol~ palllcl minaal rishlIlIOW owned by the OrIIItots _10 Dot less
than 25%. .
LESSaponlonoflbeS,E. tl4oflbeS.E.1I4ofIbeN.W. 1/40fSeclion34, T0WIIIhip49
SouIh.IWlp 26 East, Collier County, FlorIda, beiDa more panlcullrly described IS follows:
COMMENCE at lite NorIheut comer of
26 EasI; lUll thonee, South 0'20'07"
34, a dill8nce of2,324.86 feet
distance of323.86 feat to a po :
IhenceSoulhO'I9'I3"1!ul, di
Southweslet'ly; thence,
said CUM bavIaa........ II
593.78 foello tho end of
thence, NlIIlh 0'20'07' W
346.19 feet 10 Ibe POINT 0
of Section 34. Township 49 SouIh. Ranae
of the Nol1hwest 1/4 of said Sectlon
. thence NlIIlh 74'09'17" Wes:..
dl&tance of 364.53 feet:
CIIlVe eoncave
run IOlIlheastedy aIon&
3' 41" ..."",dlswlceof
a iItance of92.07 feat;
. 34, a dlatllnce of
ColIlaInIna 5.231_, more
SUBJECT '10: . SO foot mutUIl . 25 feet on either side of all
~ lands iDcIudllII qlWllrlllcl q_ quarter BOCtlon lines, which '" .lOI. is '"the use
IIlcI beneIlt oflbe.v- property_
LESS AND BXCEPTPROfERTY DESCRIBED IN QVlToCLAIM DEED RECORDED
IN 0.& BOOK 2323. PAGE 508, OF TIlE PUBLIC RE(:ORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY.
PLOIUDA.
Preperty LD.lIOO2t'728t1Oll2
AS TO PARCELS 53" 381
The Weat Ii oflhe EasI Ii ofth. Northeut 1/4 of the NOllhweat 114 of Secdon 34, TownahIp 49
Sonth, Rmae 26 East, toselher with all the 011, 1llII end minoral righlllllO\V ownocl by the OrIIItor.
lU1IOIIIIling to not....lhaD 25%.
SUBJECT '10: a SO foot IIlIlIUaI right-of-way easomenlexlClldina 25 feet 011 .ither slde of ell
sectlOllIands lacIucIlas quarter end quarter qUlll'lerIlOdlon lines, which _I i. for the ....
end beIIefit oCthe a4llCC1tt property_.
. Proporlr LD.1IG029'/'72OOO9
Paae I of2
,', .
Agenda Item No. 17A
tu OR' 3076PG Fofl~a~ry 23,2010
, : 1Ulr.fl!;'lll'ta of 199
AS TO PARCEL 391
The Eat It. ollbe Northeut 1/4 ollbe Soulhwat 1/4 ollbe ~ 1/4 olSectiOll 34,
TOWIIIhlp 49 South, Raaae 26 Eut, toplber with aIIlbe oil, pslllld mineral riaJds IIOW owned
by lbe Grantor imollllllDa to 1101 less 11w125%, less llIld excepllbe pmeI set ftmh In that eenaift
StIpulated FInal Judpellt monied in O,R. Book 994, Pages 1760-1763,oflbe Public Recorda
of Collier County, FlorIda. .
SUBJECT TO: a 50 foot IlIUlIIII rlaht-of-~ _ extendinc 25 feel 011 eilber lido of all
aecllon Iaads InI1IwlIoa quaIlCr llIld quaIlCr quIiner section JInes, which eamncnt is fbr lbe _
lIIId bcacflt ollbe adjICIIIl plOpClly ownen.
r......rIf LD.1IlI0297lIllOOI
ASTOPARCEL4b
The West K oflbe Northwest 1/4 oftbe SouIheIst 1/4 ollbe Nonhwest 1/4 ofSecti0ll34,
TOWIIIhlp 49 South, Raaae 26 Eut, leu end except lbe lendi deIcn'bed in 0IficIaI Record Book
1048,....... 521-523, oltbe Public Recorda ofCoIIierCo\lllly, Florida.
PropIIt)' 1.D.1II029IOllOOO3
AS TO PARCEL 1141
lbalplll oflbe S lioflbeNW 1/4 ofSec:llon 34, Townsblp49 South, Raaae 26 East ill Collier
County, Florida, bell18 more perticularly clescribed as follows:
Commenee at lbe centerofsald
thence N 73 '00'33' W a dislaru:e
10 the POINT OF BEOINNIN
a chord beirbJaofN 73037'1 W
11.621,16 feet, Ibrouahan I
CIII'\T, tbenceN88028'35' a
feel; tbence N 73000'33" W
059'37" E a distancc of 162.00 feel;
9'27" Eadi_ofl62.00fcel
beahmJna ofa VI Soulhwesterly end bavins
curve hllVil18 a llIdius of
10 fcellO Ihe end of said
01 .13" E a dislaru:e of 109.09
BEOINNINO
E-<
""",Ill end utilities
for outdoor adverlisil18
~()
:v ion all rights ofinaRss. egms,
IIId lbe rOad named as fol1owa:
Stale Road 93 (1-75); a10118lbe foIlowin& ~bed line:
Co_ at lbe center of said SectiOn 34, ToWllllhlp 49 South, Ranae 26 East; Ihence run N
16'59'37' Sa c1i_ 01 162.00 feet; tIumce N 73000'33" W a dl_ of 893.75 feel: tbence N
16059'27' Sacliatanee 01 152.00 feet; tbence S 73000'33" E acliatanee ofl02.33 fcellolhe
besWDl18 oflbe beteln clescribed LimIted Aceeu LIne; Ihence N 73000'33' Wa cIiatanee of
102.33 feet to Ihe bqinnlDs 01 a curve concave Soulhwesterly and bavil18 a chord beariD& ofN
73037'19' W; Ihence Nonhweaterly aIol18 said curve baviag a radllIS of 11,621.16_ Ibrouah
an IllllIe of 1013'41' an arc c1iataneeol249.10 &let to lbe end of said curve and !be END of said
deIcrIbed LimIted Acceu LIne.
Properly J.D. MMn9'7280ll02
Q:\o\pp\WI'SI.........T..-~.,.,..,IMdL.eatJM.u.....
Page2of2
\>_'-"''- 9
..t..",,"'t:.~"'llr
It-\~ .
Agendal\.6.l1l No 17A
2867440 ~r~~U42flliow76
RI IDID ID O!!lCIAI 1sciR1l1lil'!iil,af11llafin, IL
10 11/2101 .t 01:58U mGB'll. lROCI, CLBRI '
con 250001.01
RIC III 11.51
DDC-.lI 1151,11
. THIS INSTRUMENr PREPARED BY:
Paul A. MUIT8)', PA..
Paul A. Mamry, P.A.
5117 CutoIIo Drige, Sullo %
Nopl.., Florida 34l.83 "
RECORD AND RETURN TO:
SIesIq PlIoD "W.od .
1000 To......1 TnII NonIl
N.ples, l'IorIda 3410%
I III i lILl11
I IIWW ft 1211
. Lie lI111li
RB PARCBL lD f: OI2!N1G11lJ91
BtJYBR.'S TIN: f5.6JI0225
WARRANTY DEED
THIS WARllA.NTY DEED made tbia :I8lh dlQ' 01 Sep1omber, ZOOI by Em..aal Un!, 0.1..... DICarlucd uud
-- Zeopd, - called Graul.. .... whosO addroiO ;, 100 8_1 Ilmld, New Cllf, New YorI< 10956-3137
10 1''''' H. IIrzeoId, _ of no Laud ~_ #1-B, daIad Sepbouber 11, :zoot, "lIh I'uII =.:::d .ulhorllf to ported,
........... ...~ I..... _ber, _, ....... lllOO'lpp, ~e, release, -11, or _ ..._
uud dls_ of ..... _ or lIlI1 port Iheroof, Iu __ with SeclIou li89.an or !he I'IorIda StatuM. hercinalter
called Gramee aud wIiooO address 10 5147 Seoh..... A_,Naples, JlorI... 34103.
l'WIaerwmlr IIIed bcIW. die teml "plInaor- ~.~ I&lchMta al:l the partiel .lO 0lII insl.nlrnc:nl and the
~m. "I RflRRDtaItva ami _pi 01 ill4MduaIa. ud Ihe ~ and ..... of aorpoJIIllonc.)
WlTNESSE'IH:
THAT <he OruulDr, for .... ia COlISidcnlioIl of !he .... or Tea .... NO/1lIO Dona.. and other YIlIlIIIble
cousider....... ..ceipt whereof 10 ~ adao~ IaeRby _ harpIao, ..n.. aIlcus, ..urisoa, r........ .......,. .
aud oon6rms llUlo <he OrllUlee, all that certaia IuuI situate, IyIug ..d beiD& ia C.mer Couuty, no";da, va:
East 1/1. of !he N__1/4 of !he S_ 1/4 of the NOl1hwatl/41u
SeeIIoo 34, T.....hlp 49 South, 1laup:16 Eut, Colllor CouaI1, FlorIda.
THIS PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND
The .... _ descriheti ... thb .............. " aot the ....llItu_.. ho_ead ..r the prl....,.
Jlh1oIc:aI resldeuce or lbe Gnmter.
SUBJECT TO..... accnUug subscqueal to December 31, %000. '.
SUBJECT TO CO\'eDanta, restrictions and. CUGmcnt5 of. rcconJ. tf ~ however. this reference thereto shaD not
opmdc to r~'=K68ZDe. ,
TOG with aU the tcncmcuts, hereditamcots and appurtenancea ~to belooging or in anywise
a~tuVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple foreVer. .
AND the GI'lllllor hcre!>Y """"""" with .aId Oraulec that <he Gruutor is l.wruUy sci=I 01 said laud iD foe simple;
that the G...-. .... good ri2hi .... lawful authority to oeII aud _ said laud; that <he Grautor hereby fully war,....
the title to said land ai:ad will itclcnd the same BgaiD&t the lawful claims of all persons whmnsocwer, and that said land i& frcc
of all encUmbrances. I
IN WITNESS WHEBEOF, the said GrantOJ' hIlS signed and scaled thcso prcseDtI the day and year fIrSt above
written. .
.....
Amn8rrflWllhbf'''''-dl'lnl......m.=n,.... ''''''-l.M
"""
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
OR: 19W~f'fOm
Signed, .caled and dclivct'cd In our pscseocc:
~"
..-~
J::1.='<- ~
H /f-fJ..(A/1.. MQn z..E>
Wltncl$ .t"rmtecl :il IU"O
~?/~.
Ang la 'ga
STATE OP NEWYORIt
COUNTYOP tlfloSsrrV
The rOl~ IlIStrumcot was acknowledged bcIorc m. lhIa. \C1 dl\l1 of c..,,~;i()I')1 by ......1&
Zengarl, He/She ~ personall1ltDomI to me or bas prod'Uce:r'-- l.)~\. \~
II lclontllicatioa. .
uC~~f,! S<U\\"(.
(J.l orRan
36 - '-\:'1'-\'+~O.:)
(~orJal NO. d any)
~AT~ICIA SANTANIELU)
NOIIt'/ PublIc,
Statt 01 New Yolk
No, 30047_
Quelll1ed In Noasau CouIII\I
o.~. FI10d NIII8U COuII\p
OommInlon Ell!>. MaId> 30, ioJ:2:>
..~
. .. .
~
.mess _tvf. ,
~~IA old
(loess IplturO
,
o.17A
2iJJ 8
STATE OF NEWYORIC
COUNTY OF oAAuGolO sf-
Th. lorcgoina minim... .... acknow1cclacd bclcrc m. Ihls 6i.1::st;_ of S> trl-., '.a m I by E....ue1
UnI, Hc7Shi Is persoaall.r kDOWD: to me or has produced ~ ~
_u idcotific:a~b.' . .
Nota Publlc, Stat. ~ Afor...id
' .
O.rjI ~h
. .:.~.~;;=~~~.!;';~.'.
,,', ..: N"'~~~ $ia..tU1e
. ~ .;.jo...." c-' ~'. ~
: ':~' ~..z.;. .: RINE ANN IIICHI!I.DN
.: ;~. ! ~~.r: NO.IOIII224
" \. (.~.. ';, ......,PUItIO. .....afNew'Vbrk
.': "'./ ""'-"-"r ,,,,r"')
" ," M.~__~
{llUCor KI.DIC)
{,se.rw NO.. d any)
......
""1Ioftttret'''''."""",,IIt<I''R''I~___1M. '...oo..no..'21S
"'"
.
.
v.". ....y. . -. ....,..
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 62 of 199
".
Signed, oeaIcd and delivered in our presonco:
~~~
&~::~
ess IgallUre
K~ /)~'r!.'/...n'
Dolores DiCarlucci
STATBOPNEI'M'QIlS ItAr
COUWYOP ~
f, '7.,r c--~ <'>-- J
Tho foroi!<>!nllalirum..., ..... adCDowIedged boCoro mo lhIa u- dOl' of ../JI>. "....,.,. by Dol....
Dlcmu.~ .He/She Is' ptpaon.Uy Down. to me or .... prodUce4 AAr 0
'...... as idelltifi~tioD. .
:tt;~~~ (IrtW~Rank)
'r ,\ '
Notary .rniIIuJ~~t1 (Senal NO., 11 any)
NC1IARY PUBLIC Of IlEW JERSEY
My 00_ E,,"," JIIIlO 25,2004
~
~ ilh n:i;i it it >- ~ ~
i }~a . ~b. li~ ., .11 W il\
· I~I ~ l::lbi . ill. '. ~ > ...
i I.~! R illb i II f~ I ~ ~ '"
~I ~i!1 ; iil~ i i! I!; ;! ~ ~ ~;fi ~
1'..'"1 i Ib.i I bl !Ibl 51 <( -:l 51d'i'
"II! b blbP ~ b I.... iil-fl'
1111.i:; ~. ilUii lid!, I- g ! ~~a
b ~~.II !: .~~iU !~~h& ~I
II "ill- i !a;sft! .I;!I~! a
i~ 1m: 1.!IIIMn!l~illl
I~ .................... """'=--:...'"'=".:'~
"'
N
i
i
g
@
\
I
-
- - '
I
I
@
'l
e
@
h
.
1
8
I
r:
~
h I
.1
lJl(
II
(0
"
;J
.
@
I
~
II
Ii
I ~
II ~ l
Ii ~ ~~!
ui B
I
Iii!!
,Itlll
III ;
I ;
\ -
b
o
co
b
!f
b
o
...
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 63 of 199
~
I
~
,
i
:Ii
i
I!l
:;
I
~
I!l
w
ili
~
.
I
i
!
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 64 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUD Ownership Information
The subject lands ara comprised of three ownership interests. as follows:
1. Teryl H. Brzeskl and Pawel Brzeskl, own as husband and wife, S-T-R 34-49-26 E 1/2 of
NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NW ).II, which comprises five acres and is Idenllfled by Folio/PID #
00297600006, that was acquired by Warranty Deed recorded at O.R. Book 3002, Page 2740.
2. Teryl H. Brzeski Is Trustee of Land Trust 1 B, dated September 11, 2001, which Trust
owns S-T-R 34-49-26 E 1/2 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NW).II, less the northerly 22+ feet described
in O.R. Book 3550, Page 2809, comprising 4,82 acres Identified as Follo/PID # 296800001;
acquired by Warranty Deed recorded at O.R. Book 2904, Page 876; and according to tax
returns, the ownership of the beneficial interests are as follows:
Teryl H. Brzeskl 53.0435162%
Gabriel Beyrent 26.4130221 %
Nora S. Beyrent 18.5869415%
Garrell FX Beyrent 1.9585202%
3. Magnolia Pond Holdings llC (llC), owns the approximately 37.23 acres that make up
the balance of the subject property acquired by, and more fully described in Warranty Deed
recorded at OR Book 3749, Page 161, as Parcels 8, 20, 21, 33 & 38, 39, 41, and 114,
respectively Identified as Folio/PID #'s 296760002, 297240000, 297280002, 297720009 &
297840002, 297880004, 298000003, & 296721009.
The llC's Manager Is Teryl H. Brzeski; and the llC's ownership Is as follows:
Teryl H. Brzeskl, Gabriel Beyrent and Nora Beyrent as Trustees
of the Garrell FX Beyrent Trust Dated July 15, 2002 ....................... 50%
Gabriel Beyrent and Nora Sharpe Beyrent as Trustees of the
Beyrent 2005 Descendants Trust Dated April 28, 2005 .................. 25%
T eryl H. Brzeskl as Trustee of the Beyrent 2005 Dynasty
Trust Dated April 28, 2005 ............................................ ................... 25%
PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318 REV' 4
MAGNOLIA POND PUD .
Project: 19990108
Date; 7/14/09 DUE: 8/11/09
N"APLESJS7209S v.OJ
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 65 of 199
NAME OF APPUCANT(S) MAGNOLIA POND HOLDINGS. LLC & LAND TRUST 1 B
ADDRESS 5147 SEAHORSE AVE CITY NAPLES ' STATE FL ZIP 34103
TELEPHONE # 239-434.5944 CELL # FAX # 239~262.8731
&-MAIL ADDRESS: SCUDSITEIalAOL.COM
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE):
SeetlonjT ownship/Range
Lob Block:
34 I 49S I 26E
Subdivision:
Plat Book Page #1 Property I.D.#:00297720009. 00297840002. 00297240000.
00297880004.00298000003.00296800001.002967600002.00297280002.00296721009.
00296800001
Mete. & Bounds Deserlptlon:
1';;~t";\~;'t;:;;ri'"C\,;(;;,t\5~;QF$~W~~,'I)I$fQS~:itij~;J'..RQY>>5tJ)-;", "",'"
(Checlc applicable system):
';,'1
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGETREATMENTPLANT
(GPD capacity)
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM
18I
o
o
o
o
(<;i;,;j1.t}];L!,ii:,J:~:;;'i:,.t:I;;::J:Y~~'Q~j'A~~:$~gY:i~)'l:g~~Jf:~Q,~lj!i~j;);::~;:;;;IC';:C'; ;.,.,'iXiTC'!;C:;',',.'
a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIV A TUYSTEM (WELL)
IZI
o
o
o
Application For Publio Hearing For P\JD Rezoue 6/14104
PtnDA-2006-AR-I0318
PROJECT #19990108
DATE: 8/16106
MELISSA ZONE
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 66 of 199
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - pall- 2
, " ,,', '-"':' :" ,', "', " '.' "',;:' . '-'" \, ',' ':" ", " ,',' ~ '.,'" " "':,', .: . ,', ":. ,'" . .
tQ'tA~"QP,piiAT:li)ij"Qa.~RV"Q: 231 Residential Units
"~~f~"P,,~y~~ji~,~y,jQM1>>4P$;
A. WATER-PEAK 242.550 GPO ,AVERAGE DAILY 69.300 GPO
B. SEWER-PEAK 242.550 GPO AVERAGE DAILY 69.300 GPO
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED 2010
tII'A:~MiffV.'$J4~~"fi Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soli involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
C9~~!~~f>>Vi\iTY"iftj~I~'p~t>'ii;~n9f11Y$tAt~Mit4tllf the project Is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage
collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities
In accordance with all applicable County ordinances In effect at the 01 time. This statement
shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and
connectlonfees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the Issuance of building
permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to
dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
$TA:t~M~""JQI'2A.V.M~A~j~tfY~!.'A'qI't!F*qM.,jgTH~Ri~"QVIP(~$f,unless waived or
otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, If the project Is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider Indicating that there Is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
Application For Public Rearmll For PUD R=nc 6/14104
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 67 of 199
.....~
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND Wll.DLIFE SERVICE
South FIonda Ecolo11;ical Services Office
1339 20'" Street '
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
August 22, 2008
PUDA-2006-AR-10318 REV: 3
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
Project: 19990108
Date: 1/30/09 DUE: 3/2109
Roy S. DeLotelle
DeLotelle & Guthrie, Incorporated
1220 SW 96th Street
Gmnesville, Florida 32607
Service Federal Activity Code: 4l420-2007-FA-0039
Date Received: March 26, 2008
Project: Magnolia Pond
County: Collier
Dear Mr. DeLotelle:
The u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service have reviewed your letter dated March 17, 2008, and the
subsequent materials provided on June 2, 20OS, regardfug the project referenCed above. You
'bave requested technical assistance as well as our comments on the proposed project. This letter
transm.its the Service's technical assistance. The site location is Latitude 26.1650 North and
Longitude -81.6950 West.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.'
The proposed project consists of a new residential development ~wn as Magnolia Pond on an
approximately 47-acre site. The site consists entirely of uplands, the majority of which are pine
flatwoods with some mixed palmetto and prairie also occurrin:g on-site. Approximately 9 acres
of remnant pine-cypress communities exist on-site, however, due to extensive drainage these
areas no longer function as wetlands and are not considered to be jurisdictional. The site is
located north of Interstate 75 (1-75) and south of the Golden Gate canal, on both sides of
Magnolia Pond Drive, approximately 0.5 mile west of Collier Boulevard (County Road 951
[CR951]), Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Eastern indigo snake
Suitable habitat for the thTeatened eastern indigo snake (Dlymarchon corais coupen) includes
a mosaic of habitats, including the project area. in which they establish home ranges of up to
183 acres on average, for males, and up to 120 acres for females. Eastern indigo snakes appear
to be associated with bUlTOWS excavated by other animals, as well as naturally occurring cavities.
In the sandy central ridge of south Florida, eastern indigo snakes use gopher tortoise (Gopherus
polyphemus) burrows more (62 pCl:cent) than other underground refugia (Layne and Steiner
"
.....
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 68 of 199
Roy S. DeLotelle
Page 2
1996). The information provided indicates that gopher tortoise buri'ows occur on the project
site. Provided the Service's Standard Protection Measuf'esfor the Eastern Indigo SI'lalat
(Service 2004) are implemented during construction of the project, the Service believes the
project wiJI not result in a significant impact to the eastern indigo snake.
Red-cockaded woodpecker
The project occurs in an area with significant historical activity of the endangered Red-cockaded
woodpecker (RCW) (f>icoides borealiJi). Pine stands, or pine-dominated pinelhardwood stands,
with a low or sparse understory and IIDlple old-growth pines, constitute primary RCW nesting
and roosting habitat. In southwest Florida, the hydric slash pine flatwoods provide the preferred
critical nesting and furagi.n:g habitat forRCWs (Beever and Dryden 1992). Nest and roost
cavities are almost solely excavated in old-age living pines. Home ranges for RCWs average
141-162 ha (350-400 acres) in southern and central Florida, and can exceed 200 ha (494 acres) in
southwest Florida due to low productivity of this area (Beever and Dryden 1992). The Service
uses a 200-ha (494 acres) circular area as lhe furthest point that would allow for overlap of an
off-site territory outo the property. As such, a O.S-Ian (0.5 mile) buffer around the project should
be identified on lhe habitat maps and considered in habitat use (Service 2004).
RCW surveys have been cooduct.ed extensively throughout this area, both on the project parcel
and the adjacent parcels (Goldengate COmmerce Center). The most recent non-nesting season
sUIVey was conducted in December 2007 and consisted of ecologists (including a Service
biologist) walking transects within suitable habitat and thoroughly inspecting m(lture pines from
all four sides for the presence ofRWC cavities, No RCW cavity trees or foraging birds were
observed during the any surveys on this site. The nearest RCW observation is about 0.25 mile
east of the proposed project and the nearest known active cluster (nest tree) is about 0.9 mile
east of lhe property (Figure 1). The status of this cluster is under review bylhe Service under
section 10 of the Endangered Species Act as a component of a proposed residential development
(City Gate) and its affects on the active cluster. The'birds associated with this cluster, as part of
the Habitat Conservation Plan, are to be relocated to adjacent protected habitat and monitored
over time.
In om evaluation of project effects to RCWs, we consider on-site conditions, proximity to
adjacent suitable habitat, and if the site has been physically altered by exotic species invasion,
lack of fire, or other anthropogenic actions. These alterations can produce on-site habitat
conditions that may result in marginally suitable habitats for the survival and propagation of
Rews. The Magnolia Pond project site supports a pine flatwoods community that has become
invaded with exotic species in the understory. The adjacent parcels consist of an existing school
and proposed developments.
Based on the information detailed above, the Service believes it is unlikely that this parcel is used
as nesting or foraging habitat. Therefore, the Service believes the proposed project will not
increase adverse risk to RCWs.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 69 of 199
Roy S.DeLotelle
Page 3
Florida panther
The Florida panther was federally listed as endangered in 1967 (32 FR 4001). The present
occupied range of the panther in sOuth Florida represents about 1 percent of its historic range in
the southeastern United States. Panther home ranges average from 60 to 187 square-miles. They
frequent large areas of undeveloped forested habitats, especially oak hammocks and longleafpine
flatwoods, but use areas comprised of other vegetative cover as well. Cover, water, and adequate
prey are required to sustain panthers. When evaluating proposed projects for potential impacts to
panthers, the Service evaluates a multitude of factors such as loss and fragmentation of habitat,
loss of available prey, increased potential for traffic related mortalities, and cumulative effects.
The project is located outside of the Panther Focus Area (PFA) as defined by the Service (2007)
and the Primary and Secondary Zones (Figure 2) as defined in the report How Much Is Enough?
Landscape-saale Conservation for the Florida Panther (Kautz et ai, 2006). The project site is
adjacent to existing and planned developments and is divided from Primary and Secondary zone
habitat by major roadways as shown on Figure I. the habitat on-site is disturbed as evidenced
by colonization of exotic plants such as Brazilian pepper (Schi:n.us terebinthifolius). The project
does not contain known dispersal or connection corridors (Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission 2006) for panthers to access significant tracts of panther habitat or publicly owned
managed lands and is sU1TOunded by high-density urban development Therefore, fragmentation
of panther habitat or of panther prey hallitat is not expected from the project.
While there has been no telemetry data recorded on the project site, a total of23 verified
telemetry points have been documented within 2 miles of the project site as of Jl.D1e 2007. These
points are from a total of seven panthers and date from 1990 to 2007. Four of these cats are
known to be dead, and three are believed to be still alive (Table 1). Based on preliminary
telemetry data that has not yet been verified, cat FPI4<i continues to use this area. The nearest
telemetry data of a live panther is a 2007 recorded location ofFP146, 1.4 miles southeast of the
project site. These telemetry locations typically represent day-time resting sites. Areas arol.D1d
these telemetry points are panther habitat providiJig functional value to panthers (Comiskey et al..
2002). T~emetry locations only apply to panthers that historically had collars on them; they are.
not a comprehensive database of suitable habitat for pan~ers. The activity of any tmCOllared
panthers that might have used the area is unknown; however, four uncollared panthers were killed as
a result of vehicular collisions within 5 miles of the project site between February 2004 and
March 2008 (Table 2). Based on telemetry and mortality data, it is evident that panthers dO use
habitat near to this site; however, there is a distinct area with no ielemetry data that extends
approximately 0.6 mile around the site in all directions and encompasses the sU1TOunding
developments and roads. Based on the distribution of the telemetry data, as well as the location
of the project and the level of existing disturbance both SUlTol.D1ding the site and on-site, we
believe panther use of the site is not likely to occur. Since it is unlikely panthers use the project
site, the proposed action is not likely to increase adverse risk to the Florida panther.
From 1985 through 2008, there have been seven instances of vehicle collisions with panthers in a
5-mile radius of the site, six of these resulting in death (Table 2). The traffic data provided
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 70 of 199
Roy S. DeLotel1e
Page 4
indicates that this project will result in an increase in traffic in both directions on Collier
Boulevard (CR951) and on 1-75 west of the project site. A 1raffic analYsis provided by Davidson
Engineering, Incorporated, estimates that the project will generate approximately 1,308 new daily
trips exiting Magnolia Pond Drive onto CR951. This represents about a 5 percent increase in
traffic at this intf:rsecti.on when compared to the existing traffic on the same roadways in 2007.
The project's only entrance is via Magnolia Pond Drive from CR951 and it is estimated that
65 percent of the traffic (850 trips) will h'kely be generated D'OIIl north and west of the project
site, away from the PF A. There are no anticipated new trips being generated from the east on
1-75, and only 20 percent of the trips (262) are projected to continue south on CR951 past Davis
Boulevard along the western edge of the PFA. As a result, it is anticipated that the project will
generate an additional 262 trips per day (0.7 percent increase) on Collier Boulevard along the
western boundary of the PFA, and will not generate any additional trips into the PF A.
Due to the lack ofbabitat and the presence of two major roadways, we expect the use of the
project area by panthers to remain infrequent. As such, we do not expect vehicle mortality to
become a significant source of panther mortality in the project area. Based on the above, we
believe that it is unlikely that this project's 'traffic will result in increased panther mortality.
Based on the site's location amidst urban development and outside of the PF A, we believe that
direct impacts to the Florida panther are unlikely to occur. Based on the traffic analysis
provided, we believe that indirect impaCts due to B, minimal increase in traffic (0.7 percent) along
the western boundary of the PFA are not likely to result in increased mortality. rn addition, since
it is unlikely that panthers use this site, there is little potential for increased interspecific
aggression. As suoh, the project is not expected to increase adverse risk to the Florida panther.
Please note that Service review of this project in no way implies compliance with other Federal,
State, county, or municipal regulations. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the
project meets all applicable regulations. Ifmodifications are made to the project, if additional
information involving potential effects to listed species becomes available, if a new specieS is
listed, or if designated critical habitat may be adversely affected by the project, reinitiation of
teChnical assistance may be necessary.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment If you have any questions regarding this project,
please contact Victoria Foster via email atVictoriaFoster@fws.lI:ov or by phone at
772-562.3909, extension 269.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 71 of 199
Roy S. DeLotelle
Page 5
cc:
FWC, Tallahassee, Florida (Traci Wallace) electronic copy only
FWC, Tallahassee, Florida (Jane Chabre) electronic copy only
FWC, Tallahassee, Florida (Mary Ann Poole) electronic copy only
Collier County, Naples, Florida (Laura Roys Gibson) electronic copy only
Davidson Engineering., Naples, Florida (Jeremy Sterk) electronic copy only
LITERATURE CITED
Beever, J. W. and K. Dryden. 1992. Red-cockaded woodpe\lkers and hydric slash pine
flatwoods. Transactions of the 57th North American Wildlife and Natural
Resources Conference 57:693-700.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2006. Use ofJeast cost pathways to
identify key highway segments for panther conservation. Tallahassee, Florida.
Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm,
F.Mazzotti. R. McBride; L. Riohardson, and K. Root 2006. How Much Is Enough?
Landscape-scale Consenration for the Florida Panther. Biological Conservation.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo
Snake. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Florida Ecological Services Office;
Vera Beach, Florida.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Revisions to the Florida panther final interim standard
local operating procedures (SLOPES) for endangered species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; Vero Beach, Florida.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 72 of 199
Roy S. DeLotelle
Page 6
Table 1. Telemetry data details for panthers recorded within 2 miles of the project site.
Telemetrv within 2 miles
Cat Sex Oldest Most Recent Status Date Death Cause
FP37 M 10126190 10/26/90 Desd 11/26/90 Vehicle
FP92 M 02/16/01 02116/01 Dead 09/01/01 Unknown
FPI46 M 05123107 08131/07' Alive current nla
FPI47 M 11/06106 I 1/06/06 . Alive CUlTent nla
FPI48 F 04/21/06 11110/06 Alive current ' nI.
TXl01 F 05/1 0/95 OS/29195 Dead 03/29100 Unknown
TXI04 F 10/02195 10/02195 Deacl 04/J 8198 SbOotin2
"Based on preliminary GIS data.
Table 2. Instances of vehicle collisions with panthers within 5 miles of the project site.
Date Panther II) Sex Road Distance From Prolect (mlles\
05/12185" N/A F CR951 12 m; N of US 41\ 4.8
02/26/04 UCFP63 M 1.75!MM99. eastbound) 3.0
08/1.7/04 K94 M 1.75 (MM98 eastbound'i 4.3
04/07/05 UCFP73 M CR95J-iS of Rattlesnake Hammoc:k Rd) 4.0
08129/05 ' KI53 M CR9S1 fl.2 mi S of Davis Blvd'\ 1.7
04/03/07 UCFP94 M 1-751MM98 ea.tbound) 4.0
03/09108 UCFPJ03 M Pine RiMe Rd. 3.0
"This collision resulted in injury and not death.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 73 of 199
Roy S. DeLotelle
Page 7
...
"~,,,,,F,,"'A~
'"
Ptl."-Yl,DJ!'
~~ ........,.10.
,,~Ztllt
"""""~~...1tM
- ~~~!*tb
Q~n.~I)'.~
. ......1I\oooi~,_"'"
. .............<.Q>07.tilldo
O~~IllIl*ll:.~
,: .~dg~~~
eTit!W
,~..c.;.....
Magnolia Pond PUD
(Approximate property outline in pink)
Figure 1. ProjeCt site in relation to surrounding development, PF A, and nearby RCW locations.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 74 of 199
Roy S. DeLotelle
Page 8
l>x,,;'41 Panther FOll!JS ArM
IZ:J Primary Zona
IS:] SaO<indaiy Zona
~ Dispersal Zone
IDJIl] Piiniary Dispersal I Expansion Area
j' - - j0l191nlll, Panther Cons~Itl!~on Arll!!
I - _ _ . South lit'the Caloosahatchee Rivei'
D $PESQ ServleeArea
~ Dispersal Pathways frhl!tcher 20061
-'
.
,"
.. ..
...
'"
&/lilt. N
~1omUr8 A
,
o
3!
...
...
Figure 2. Panther Focus Area.
DE
DAVIDSO.......
ENGINEERING
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 75 of 199
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
Preserve Management Plan
PUDA-2006-AR-10318 REV: 3
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
Project: 19990108
Date: 1/30/09 DUE: 3/2109
PRESERVE MANAGEMENT
The follow activities will be performed on the property to ensure long term health of preserves
within the project:
Installation of protective barriers and signage. All protective barriers shall be installed and
maintained for the period of time beginning with the commencement of any phase of land
clearing or building operations and ending with the completion of that phase of the construction
work on the site, unless otherwise approved to be removed by the development services
director's field representative. All protective barriers shall be installed pursuant to the Tree
Protection Manual for Builders and Developers, division offorestry, State of Florida or other
methods approved by the Development services director. Signage shall be placed around the
preserve areas to identifY and protect the preserve during construction. The boundary of the
Preserve shall be posted with appropriate signage denoting the area as a Preserve. Sign(s) should
note that the posted area is a protected area. The signs shall be no closer than ten feet from
residential property lines; be limited to a maximum height of four feet and a maximum size of
two square feet; and otherwise comply with Section 5.06.00 Maximum sign spacing shall be 300
feet.
Exotic Vegetation Removal, Non-native Vegetation, and Nuisance or Invasive Plant
ControL All preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the property will be
walked and all Category 1 exotic and nuisance plants, and prohibited exotics as defined by the
LDC, shall be killed. These plants will be killed in a manner consistent with current exotic and
nuisance plant removal practices while ensuring that neighboring plants are left unharmed and
the soil left as undisturbed as possible. All non-native vegetation will be removed from
Preserves.
All Category I Exotics shall be killed in all preserves. All exotics within every preserve shall be
physically removed, or the tree cut down to grade and the stump treated. The stump shall be
treated with an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved herbicide and a visual tracer
dye shall be applied.
The removal method may not involve mechanical removal, whereby machinery is used to
remove the exotics.
Annual Maintenance. All preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the
property will be walked and inspected at least once yearly for the presence of exotic vegetation.
Exotic vegetation will be maintained at zero percent cover. The maintenance program will be
conducted in Deroetuitv.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite #301 . Naples. Florida 34105 . Phone: 239.434.6060 . Fax: 239.434.6084
www.davldsonanalneerina.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 76 of 199
General Maintenance. Preserves shall be maintained in their natural state and must be kept free
of refuse and debris.
Monitoring. An annual monitoring report will be provided to Collier County for 1 year
documenting the exotic removal activities and overall preserve health. The monitoring will be
according to the approved Collier County plan as part of the project's approved Site
Development Plan.
Designation of a Preserve Manager. A Preserve Manager shall be identified as the responsible
party to ensure that the Preserve Management Plan is being complied with. The developer shall
also be identified. Both parties will be responsible until such time that the homeowners
association takes over the management of the preserve. At that time, the homeowner's
association shall amend the plan to provide the homeowner association information and
information regarding the person hired by the association to manage the preserve. The
homeowner's association and their preserve manager shall be responsible for annual
maintenance of the preserve, in perpetuity.
Preserve Manager:
Jeremy Sterk
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34105
Developer:
Magnolia Pond Holdings LLC and Land Trust
5147 Seahorse Avenue
Naples, FL 34103
Wildlife Habitat Management. Gopher tortoise have been observed on the property. The
tortoise population will be relocated offsite to a FWC approved recipient site. After this is
complete, no onsite wildlife management is proposed.
Allowable Uses Within Preserve Areas. Passive recreational uses such as pervious nature trails
or boardwalks are allowed within the preserve areas, as long as any clearing required to facilitate
these uses does not impact the minimum required vegetation, and is approved by the County.
For the purpose of this section, passive recreational uses are those uses that would allow limited
access to the preserve in a manner that wilJ not cause any negative impacts to the preserve, such
as pervious pathways, benches and educational signs are pennitted in the preserve. Fences may
be utilized outside of the preserves to provide protection in the preserves in accordance with the
current LDC. Fences and walls are not permitted within the preserve area.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE RQUlRED FOR ALL PRESERVES. The preserve areas shall
be inspected in accordance with the following schedule:
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 77 of 199
. Prior to preliminary acceptance of the phase of the required subdivision improvements;
. Within the associated phase of the final site development plan prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 78 of 199
COLLIER COUNTY PUBUC UTILITIES DIVISION
.--3301 Ep,al Tamlaml Trail .-. NOJ'lI~$. PJorld,11 3411.2 . (:t~9,) 7~:!~2S7S . Fax (239)",1,'J'.2'5i6-.-"
February 7, 2008
Ms. Tocia Hamlin
Permitting Supervisor
Davidson Engineering
2154 Trade Center Way #3
Naples, FL 34109
PUDA-2006-AR-10318 REV: 3
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
,Project: 19990108
'Date: 1/30109 DUE: 3/2/09
Subject:
Magnolia Pond PUD
Water and Wastewater Availability
Dear Ms. Hamlin:
Potable water service for domestic and irrigation puIposes and sanitary sewer service are
available for the above referenced project via existing lines along Magnolia Pond Dr.
A master meter shall be required for Such facilities as rental aparlments, shopping centers, strip
malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile home parks or any other
multi-family projects that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single
family street cross-section or any other project that does not comply with or meet the intention of
Ordinance 2004-31, as amended or superceded.
If this project is not to provide the required Collier County Utility Easements (CUEs), all water
and sewer facilities shall be owned and maintained by the owner, his successors or assigns. If
this project is to provide the required CUEs, all water and sewer r8cilities shall be owned and
maintained by Co lIier County Public Utilities.
Tie-in to water and sewer lines shall be made after submission and approval of the hydraulic
calculations by Engineering Review Services, showing that the downstream systems are
adequate to handle the increase in flow, '
The District will be making phased expansions to the water supply, treatment and transmission
facilities and sewage transmission, treatment and disposal facilities servicing the area in question
and other areas of the County, based on demands within the system and other binding
commitments. These expansions should provide sufficient capacity to supply the referenced
property's anticipated potable water and sewage treatment and disposal demands and the
remainder of the District's committed capacity. However, no guarantee can be issued that
other developments throughout the District will not have an impact on the quantity of
potabie water and sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until
each phase has received a commitment for service.
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 79 of 199
MS. Hamlin
Magnolia Pond
February 7, 2008
Page 2
Connections are also subject to the availability of water and sewer capacity at the time formal
application is received. Should water supply or sewage treatment and disposal capacity not be
available, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means of water supply and
treatment and sewage treatment and disposal until the District's facilities have the adequate
capacity to serve the project
Please note that any and all improvements that you construct must be in accordance with all
applicable ordinances and policies, including the payment of impact fees.
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (239)-252-6237,
Sincerely,
rU/~
Carla J. Fogle
Engineering Technician
cc: Diane Deoss, Utility Billing Supervisor
Heather Sweet, Customer Service Supervisor
Craig Callis, Engineering Review Services
Steve Nagy, Wastewater Collections Manager
Ty Stuller, Water Distribution Manager
O:fEnalneerinJ TeelIr'Avai1,b11iry1A,...1abllhy lAMr
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 80 of 199
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did
give notice by mail to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose
members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning,
PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 10 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information
Meeting, For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be
deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entitles who
have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's
description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood
Information Meeting.
Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part ofthls
Affidavit of Compliance
c.1{Qj ~ A1 0-:
(Signature of Applicant)
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this
1+
day of
l1f~1
persona i1y
. 20eR by....:J aU Ci. l:fzu.tl in
.~
known to me or who has produced
-
as identification.
~[j}f,().. * D0d\ J
( gnature of Nota y'1>ublic)
JLDSICCl. hn mhS.
Printed Name of Notary
(Notary Seal)
1) Hemry Publi<: S_ of FlorkIB
,..... Jes81c8 Ramos
. I i My CommIsSion 00789561
\:' ..' ExllilU05JI812012 ~ ~_ ~
Sm'fiot~ Feed SheetsT'"
'-1,~p~~r.lV",\.L.!l
8441 OOOPER CIlSEKIll.VO'
UI'II\lEftlil1:Y'p~~i!,j;(, :lIl~Q;~
~!;ijj'.1lJ\GH/!I,
HIlC132~J:lAVE5W
l'liiI'~ol'L a4!1li421~
~~UilY'
LAURAiGARCIA
.r$~PAVf!,'$W
NAPLES,FL l!lI"'~1
$~.a;~LH
LAN!) M\,B Ti!lUST'
Q1.ti,lI(l.\iI!,
514NlEAHORSE AVE'
NAPL$.l'L~,~24lii1
(\l<;!QN!; All'RED.B.pIiTfiiCiA
PO,SOll-ol16
!lINGTbWN,PA 17~fi7411$
CAEAM C/iOlPI;,flQMeS XiVLm
4:!43NORTH,LAKEBL\(O~" [j
pi\i:.M BQH GtitI/s,Fl ~lo..6278
GAill1~MIG~
6414TH STSE,
NiiI'LES,F!. $4117+-2284
GlJeAAEllOTa, Ii
TROPICi\T>lA TFlUST
45;Z);S'!' pL sW
NAPLE5.FL 341'5-ll2!il
HBlNANDEz; AIlMANDO'
~7:l?Nll...VE,SW
NAPLEB,Fl 34"_274
JACKSON, KATRlNe
~5*$ff'Lsw
NAPLE5.FL 3411_259
.. AVISRVIlO
Addre5$l.ilhe~
Agenda Item No. 17A
US5~fe~<I>
-Pif~feil'1 011Tl1f
APbSiA.Al.W.NElER
'!i\7,13l!Np'A"",,,",,,'
"",,;;,;'-,,'~~"
N"",-"",K 541'_4,
AlKATlilT~LII\'!'!EDI'/j'n)!Fl~,
4~JiiJ:t~,i.N"
NAPLES,fI' 341~7l!4i!
AAiEs,WffAL OFU CORP
pq!!(;iX~
s'i'O$se:t,NY' ,11791...0238
~.AFf,. ',<Ifl,.,:~,>"..'
illAjij....,f,jiSm
, """"i)' lIE....
,!\!)""",,,"';<>;""
T>lAPlJ1lU'L 1I411lH8231
ElE!I'ITLI!v"MARU!NEe
'!:tMIir'!;B~
'1l2O'I BIFlNAM WOCDS DR
MM1f/W1,'IA\!al12-4:'I\!li
$~e~:tiiti'li.
MAJ;jn;,VEIlONlIilUE BONV!E;
,~,~~b.I'IIAao:
NAPLES;a. 341oa;,.,263'
SFlZESKl. TERYL _ PAWEt.
~1~i'.li!l;AkoaseA'I~
NAPl.ES'FL3o\'~ee
SUN..'tlNGlio'" ,.."
C1~~[~N~
~~AVj!l!.W
NAPLES.I'L 30\11_232
COIJ.IEfI CNTY
Ij(WlgOf !:iq~CpMMlS$IdNeJ:lS
3301, iJ'..AMI!\Ml Tl'lL e
l\!AI'!$!\,j;(, 34112--4981
Gt:!!ol~WiLL~J;,~~'ii1YL
45lJOG2NIMVJ:SW
NAPLl!$;FL 11411ii-ii$i!
OaHOMMESj INIVE$
1llEIJI.!PH~ BSIlN";OIN
4535S2Nll'AVESW
.,APLEll:FJ, !l41,ii~1
t!E;VtSb!:ieBKN,>,1t.1'RiJ$t oo)rfl
." om RESlDe/TlALlENDlNG tNe
!lIOH"'Y~$'"
TAllAHASSE!E,PL 32301+-
GEORC3E; THOMAS WO& IRISTOlXl
~h~PAYEllW ' " ,
NAPLES~PL ~11~4
\lliW', CA1iiY-MYN~';"PAlJL
45'U2ND AVE SW
NAf'(.ES;FL 3lI1\6'-ll232
GUZMAN,ELOY J
I.WiTAQHiiVEk-
ANAY REYES-GUEBRPi
~1'l#44TiiST$W "
NAPLES,FL 3o\\1~
IiANQY, TAi\CeliN'N L
442Sll2NllAVll'SW
1il~,FL $lIlf~W'4
IMRE!;LIfZEIlI; $1$VeN,
44hiiir'pLilW
NAPLEil,FL 341'64250
INIMiIACllANK "S,B
11!S'1II\;A!q;A~ll/'Iil/'L
PAilAbENA,OA 91'D'-.Il61S
K!I\iS(;l!3'l.R9L.!.QJo& MAMARET
443032ND AVE SW
~,FL 34\I~7il
KRUElllER;SCOTT D
'!4j(i~p 'Av~I;W
IlAPLEB,FL 3411s.,.;e273
I..aser
~96(}"'"
Smp(l~h feed Sfleets'ri'f;
MAGN04A !lOll" HOlx>lll$!l@
~l#S~RS~AVrl
NAPL.ESJ'l S410~Sll
MCDANIEl; lil~
~J#lMoRJiiik'
iIl\9nl!llP~,!lW
NAP~,pt ~11~2s9
N!Jl; ~~ll'Il.Sv A
~~S~IlD;i.VE:SW
N~il'L 34flP;.19111
FiAMIRez,BAuoEt.1\l4 QWE
44&i~OA\lESW "
NAPLES;PI. S41~,S'-ill!'i4
RUPE,KARpri
:.(J;4ll i!l!~D IIYE SVI
NAPLESlFL S4116-~~
SoHqQ!'Pl!ltf:l!9H1Pe.,
MiKE DAvis EleMEJirrARYSCHOOL
~lS~~~PO/IIDQ1i!
NAPLES,F1. 'l4l1HSOO
SMITH. VICi<l L
4~ s2NQ AVE SW'
!lAPLE$,FL 8411s-seaa'
SW~.Jt.MESQ-l !lAf/i;Y A
3B !lACY DR
I,/\KI!Il00Rtle.NY 1~~
WIy.\.IiING JR, Tlij;obPR. R
LiNDA WILMERING '
4~~,3?NIl AVE,SW
NAPLes.PI. 'l411~1B
8AVlmY@
Address I'.oabe[s
Agenda Item No, 17A
Usi~~
Wlt3l'!Q~iAl16lieilPl\i; P!!V dO ll.a
28400W 12M1LE'Ro'STSIitl,
sb\.!ti:li'i1(!I.PJ;lJ4~;';1'ii!i,
MARTINEZ; QOM
JQ$iit($A!lel.~flei
""" 32ND.AVESW
NAl'LE$,'f\, (l.jiifHi<74'
MQ$P1,$A\jIN~
4'0~DAVMW
!lAi'tesiFt 34116-"11273
NESBIT, flAYi>lQJ:!DW
$\~4TFfiIT'SW' '
NAPLE$;f1; S4tl~
PA'tJNO",jOFIGiiNAN
~Jj! !'l,J~y.w(li:i!l'tili,
l'fIi,pLl;a,PI. 34"e.,'419
R.I;!lPOMC)i,~LeclNAI.
li:tIl'IiI3Rb s'1' sW
NApJ.;Es,f,\, i!4,1~~
~boUiilJfl. wil.1.IAM E
44<Ill~IWESW
NAPLES,a s411Hm
~9'!l.~!'l\J;e!"fWR,~EcqAJ
_~Q A SW
NAJ!LES..FL S41l~4
ilA!lPoVAI.. J Am'ONil!l
POBO~"e41a " '
NAl'leS,Ftil41ti1~413
SGHOO4PlS1'!l1(;r<GGH
dQi:.tiEN iV.+iHIQH'
%S~PERI!%E!<l:1JiN:I'
Sti5oilbEou;illL
NAPl;esJ'l :l41lj9-'W!ll
$CHWARi; HENRY_& MARGARET
44!!1;lgNIlAyliilW
NApLES,Ft S411~.
~p,,,,1!IU< M.'$I'Eij ASSN ING
74512THAVES'
NAi'L.$l,!'L S4jbi!-is'r.7
sOIiJViiN, RAVMOND M
NKlI:lPW'$!lilMl\I\I~lJJVAN
ROSERT ASISMAN
'l'1o(>~PAYE~
NAPi.i;sA 3411B"-W3
$~JNli'EI'iTFl"'AlioFSW'Fl.WC
siB lAMBTONLN
NI\I!l.ES,FI, 3410lJ:-e;i1i3
UftESTI, STEVEN=& JUUE
4SO(>SlS'rl'l fINI
NAPLES,FL S411s,..,e261
VAS.(;l~ EMIUANI\ l.
400120TH PL SiN
NN'l.$.FI. $411li-ilil07
.C
Laser
5960't1\!
WZI>
~
V)~
a9~
~~
o~
0)
o
t::
-.:-
N
....
w
w
::r:
en
z
-
.
Z
C)
-
en
:E
-
z
<(
Q
:)
c..
Q
Z
o
c..
<(
-
..J
o
Z
C)
<(
:E
~
~
~ ~ 1
;:j-
~ rI
"" ~
I ~
~ IV' ...
Ql Y, ...
g ~ I~ !
.<: ""
ll.
~ ~
~
..
~ ""
~
~ .
':;10- ~
Cl...
<::l
~ (J\ ~ ...
~ ~
I~ ~
t:t:
"'b ) ~ II
- . I~
~ . ['::
"< .
^'\ rj .
'?
~ ~ ... ,~
-.! 0 \
gj t 'j- /'\. .J
~ I::: ').
't:I ':r .:t--
~
.
'. .
, ,
~ I ~ ~
. ~ .~ '~ I'~ ~
1
~ :'::
~ ~ ,,;)
~ 1 I\j
~
, . "!It ~
Ql ~' cs ~ ~
E I~
l\l l{ l'-
z
~ N '" "<t It) <0 .... 00 '" 0 .... N '" "<t It) <0 .... 00
.... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... ....
~
~
.."..."....',...,.......,.,.."'.....,,.,...,.,,-,..,......
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 84 of 199
.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTlNO NOTICE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COWER
BEFORBTHBUNDERSIONBDAumORlTY,PBRSONALLY APPEARED '\tf'<<'\.. ~~C~ ~\.('~
WHO ON OATIl SAYS TIlAT HBISHB HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTI~ 10.03.00 OF THE
~_~~nm'AR<>L=-~~_
~-- - - ~~ \tr.Q.;~ &J.\to ~\
SI ATURBOFAPPLICANTORAOBNT STREET OR P.O. BOX I
~~~N:'t~~
NAME (TYPED OR ~
tJ.
~{}j ~ ~~C)~
CITY, A ZIP
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instnnnent was sworn to aruI subscribed before me Ibis 71b clay of P ~~1lIUL by
\\N">. ~l'i'<<~ personally known to me or who produced
- .
and who didldid not take an oath. r ~D""- -.. ^- ~ too. ~
, .u ~of~lic'
~\(I(\. <tOCW'-,>
Printed Name ofNotlUY Public
as identification
11"-"'- No1ary Public State of Florida
. -'f: JeufC8 Ramos
~ 'il.' b, A My Commlllllo. 00709661
> ~..., explr..0511812012
~
~
My Commission Expires:
(Stamp with serial nmnber)
-
F:\Webslte\AFFIDAVIT AND SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS 5-2.05.doc
t.
....'" ':
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 90 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA
P{ij)~A-2006-AR-I0318
List of Addenda for eepe Hearing
January 7,2010
I. Pages I and 2 which were previously a title page and list of exhibits have been
removed since they are no longer necessary under the current POO format.
2. Under Exhibit A, item A.I., Ms. Deselem recommended capping the number of
residential single family units to 125 which is reflected in the TIS. The petitioner
has no objection to this change.
3. Under Exhibit A, item AA, there is a "conversion ratio" related to net acres of ALP
and net developable units which has caused some confusion, It is entirely
conceivable that the project could contain both an ALP use and single or multi-
family residential uses that are not components of the ALP. The intent of this PUD
language was to provide a conversion ratio based on the net developable land. The
language in the MPUD removes preserve, lakes, easements and buffers to reflect a
net developable area of27.94 acres. With a maximum of231 units, the project's net
density equals 8.27 acres. Therefore for each net acre of land developed for ALP,
exclusive of preserve, lakes, easements and buffers, 8.27 units would be subtracted
from the available 231. Since this language was originally developed for this PUD,
a general residential to ALP conversion ratio has been accepted that allows for 4
ALP units for each residential unit. This ratio is also acceptable to us so it is the
applicant's position that we can retain the language currently proposed or we can
amend it to reflect a 4: I ratio, whichever approach this body deems to be acceptable.
I have included the 4: I conversion ratio language here for your review and
consideration, This language would also need to be changed on the MCP since it is
reflected there also.
4. Also on Exhibit A, Item B.6., Ms. Deselem noted that some older language
referencing the "County Manager or designee" was used which needs to be updated
to read "Board of Zoning Appeals" as it pertains to determinations of compatible
accessory uses. That change has been made here and identical language has also
been added as a new item 5. above under permitted uses to be consistent.
5. Table I of Exhibit B, under the single family and two-family categories, the setbacks
for Principal and Accessory structures as it relates to the MPUD boundary was listed
as NA. To avoid confusion, I suggest revising this to read 20' and 10' respectively
for principal and accessory structures.
6. Just below the previous item in Table I, Exhibit B of the PUD contains a lake
setback of 20'. Due to the required 20 LME, this is redundant and should therefore
be removed.
7. Next on Table I is under footnote 6 which states the Minimum floor area for ALF
shall be calculated per the permitted FAR of .60. This should read Maximum
instead of minimum.
8. Also under Table I as a new footnote 8, a change was recommended by
Commissioner Strain. As mentioned previously, the buffer along Magnolia Pond
Drive is a fairly heavy Type 'D' buffer within a 10' cross section. Also, accessory
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 91 of 199
structures are pennitted within 10' of the rear property line. Under the configuration
shown on the POO Master plan, the developable areas backing up to Magnolia Pond
Drive would face internally, making the portions of the lots facing magnolia Pond
Drive their back yards and subject to a 20' setback for principal structures and 10'
for accessory structures. Commissioner Strain raised a valid point that accessory
structures could be placed 10' off the ROW line which may be aesthetically
problematic. I would like to suggest therefore that either a 6' wall be required
within the required 10' buffer or allowing the type 'D' vegetation buffer without a
wall but require a 15' buffer width and thus a IS' setback for any accessory
structures. I have added footnote 8 to Table 1 to accomplish this.
9. Under Exhibit F, Item 3.C., the County Attorney has requested clarifying language
with regard to the 30' easement along the Eastern Property line. The requested
language is shown here identifying the easement as a drainage, utility and access
easement and indicating that it is to be conveyed at no cost to the County. This item
carries over into Item 3.E. which discussed a fair share contribution toward the clean
out costs of the MOO-IS drainage swale. I have confinued with Transportation
Staff that the donation of the easement will more than satisfy this cited cost and
therefore this reference can be removed.
10. OJ1i'E'lthibit.F, Item 4.E. the applicant has added language to ensure the donation of
the 20' pedestrian easement within 30 days of the adoption of this rezone. As stated
previously, we are in the process of providing the requested easements and should
have them in the hands of the County Attorney for review in the next two weeks.
11. Language has also been added under Exhibit F, item 6.A. that comes from the
previously approved PUD which requires that the buildings, lighting, signage and
landscaping is to be architecturally and aesthetically unified. This was removed
because it is not typical of the current PUD's but the applicant is fine with requiring
that this language be retained should it be the desire of this body.
12, Also on Exhibit F, item 7.A. has been added at the request of the County Attorney to
further clarify the definition of a care unit with respect to the ALF use. The
language is nearly identical to that which this body has reviewed for at least one
other similar project.
13. Lastly, on the Mep the ROW was identified as "pavement" and should have been
called out as ROW. This change is also recommended to come back to you on your
consent agenda
Agenda Item No. 17A
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 94 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December Z008
Table of Contents Palle
Project Description 4
Trip Generation 5-6
Trip Distribution and Assignment 7-9
,
. Background Traffic 10
,
Existing and Future Roadway Network 11
Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network-Roadway Unk Analysis and
Intersection Analysis 12-15
Improvement Analysis 16
Mitigation of Impact 16
Appendix A: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting and Additional
Notes/Emails) (9 Sheets)
Appendix B: Project Site location Map and Aerial Map (2 Sheets)
Appendix C: Project Master Concept Plan (1 Sheet)
Appendix 0: ITE Worksheet for Selecting B!:'!tween Trip Generation Average Rates
and Equations (2 Sheets)
Appendix E: 2015 and 2030 Collier County RoaQway Network Financially Feasible
Plans (2 Sheets)
Appendix F: Impact Fee Summary Calculation Sheets (2 Sheets)
Appendix G: ITE Land Use Code Description Sheets (2 Sheets)
Appendix H: Excerpts from Intersection Analysis Data Prepared by Kimley Horn-
Collier Blvd Corridor Study (October 2006)-(12 Sheets)
3
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 95 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUOA Traf/lc Impact Statement-December 200S
,
,
Project Description
The Magnolia Pond Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) project Is
located off of and is bisected by the existing 2-lane Magnolia Pond Drive. The
property is about a half mile west ofthe intersection with Collier Boulevard (CR
951) in Collier County. The project is located on 10 parcels totalizing
approximately 47 acres. The south side of the project abuts 1-75, the west portion
of the project abuts Golden Gate High School, the north portion abuts the Golden
Gate Canal, and the east portion abuts a future Collier County Elementary school
site and other undeveloped property. The project is located In Sections 34,
Township 49S, Range 26E, Collier County, FL Refer to Appendix Band C for site
maps, a site aerial and a project master concept plan.
The Magnolia Pond PUDA would allow residential development of either single-
family or multi-family (Appendix G: ITE Land Use Code Descriptions). This TIS will
evaluate the greater trip generator ofthe two development scenarios.
Table i-Development Program
Table Note: 'Refer to Appendix G for applicable Land Use Code Descriptions
Land Use ITE Land Use Code' Total SIze BuildooOut Year
Slnjle-FBmlly '.210 '~ilnlb 2015
Or Or Or
Mui~1Il1\y 2$0 ,23;1. , .. ,....2ois
An internal site circulation system would anticipate a single intersection
connecting'the northern parcels and southern parcels to the existing Magnolia
Pond Drive (Appendix C: Project Master Concept Plan).
4
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 96 of 199
MagnolIa Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Trip Generation
The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (iTE) Trio Generation Manual. yth Edition. The software program Trip
Generation by Microtrans (Rev. 1/06) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip
generation for the project. The ITE equations were used for the estimated trip
generation (Appendix D). Tables 2A and 28 illustrate the respective single-family
and multi-family trip generation scenarios for the project.
Table ZA-Project Trip Generation (Single-Family)-Average Weekday
125 Units of Slnlle-Famlly Detached Average Driveway
Hourlnc Rate Volume
Avg. Weekday Z.Wey Voluma 10.21 1,277
7;#AMPPleflOlll'l!ntef . 'O;i,!i' :::;.',~'.:
7.9 AM Peak Hour ExIt 0,58 73
7i.9,AMP.ak~ilIijoT.1 0,,:78,' ,~t
.. . ,.
4-6 PM Peek Hour Enter 0.66 83
,'~6jiM P8akHour:Exit a,311. 411
4-6 PM Peek Hour Total 1,05 131
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr.2-WayVolume: LN(T) = .92LN(X) + 2.71, R^2 = 0.96
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = .7(X) + 9.43
R^2 = 0.89, 0.25 Enler, 0.75 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .9LN(X) + .53
R^2 = 0.91, 0.63 Enter, 0.37 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = .7(X) + 12.05
R^2 = 0.89, 0.26 Enter, 0.74 exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .89LN(X) + .61
R^2 = 0.91, 0.64 Enter, 0.36 Exit
5
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 97 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Tralf1e Impact Statement-December 2008
Table 2B-project Trip Generation (MuItJ..Famlly)-Average Weekday
231 Dwelling Units of Multi-Family Averase Drtveway
(Condo/Townhouse) Rate Volume
AVI, Weekday 'l..Way Volume 5.66 1,308
1... AAt peak Hoiir EIlter . 0.ri1 1'1
7-9 AM Peak Hour ExIt 0.36 84
. y..gAN\ hilk HoiItr~! " 0.44 101
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.35 80
4-/i'~.,Peait Ho!!r IixIt ' . 0.17 39'
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.52 119
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN{T) = .85LN(X) + 2.55, R^2. .83
7.9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN{T) = ,8LN(X) + .26
R^2 = 0.76, 0.17 Enter, 0.83 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN{T) = .82LN(X) + .32
R^2 = 0.8, 0.67 Enter, 0.33 exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .82LN(X) + .17
R^2 = 0.8, 0.18 Enter, 0.82 exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = .34(X) + 38.31
R^2. 0.83, 0.64 Enter, 0.36 ExI1
The Multi-Family development scenario has the highest average daily two-way
traffic (1,308 vpd); however in the link analysis, the peak hour, peak direction
volumes are what are evaluated and the single-family PM peak hour entering of
83 vph and the multi-family AM peak hour exiting of 84 vph are the highest
volumes and so the 84 vph value will be used in the project analysis as the peak
hour peak direction traffic volume.
6
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 98 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA TrafI1c Impact Statement-December 2008
Trip Distribution and Assignment
The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways
using the knowledge of the area, comparing Traffic Analysis prepared for projects
In the immediate area (2005 Magnolia Pond PUD TIS, 2003 & 2007 City Gate
Commerce Park Traffic Analysis, and 2005 Abercia Retail/Office Development Site
Traffic Operations Study), and as directed by Collier County Transportation
Planning Staff. The site-generated peak hour, peak direction trip distribution is
shown in Table 3 and is graphically depicted on Figures 1 (AM Distribution) and 2
(PM Distribution).
Table 3-Project Traffic Distribution for AM Exiting Peak Hour (Peak Hour and
Peak Direction)
2015 Projected Peale
Distribution Hr. Peale Direction
Roadway link RoadwaV LInk Location of Project Project Traffic
Traffic Volume (AM,
Exltlnl!)
r-'lmQilBllOiJd Df EntraHce to COlI.!er 81vd ' l(io% , il4
Coll1er Blvd N. of Magnolia Pond Dr 30% 25
N. Of C:;old~ri Gate PkwV '. -.,.
Z596 21
5, of Magnolia Pond Dr 7096 59
S,ofl.15 ,.. is" ~9
S, of Davis Blvd 20% 17
Dilvis80ulewrd . ' W,OfClliller Blvd. " )5%' 13
W. of Radio Road B% 7
Jla~ R~ w. oft:!a\tj~ Blvd ,,!,, . . &
7
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 99 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-Oecember 2008
Figure 1-Project AM Peak Hour Traffic DIstribution Entering and Exiting
"
,
"21 NB;6
,
,
100%' 84EB' 24WB
NB; 768
~711
;"2.
o ftOAQ
$.
I
~
I
i
20%'.17 SB' 5 NB
'7' '2
rei;; "gs;a;;uija'''j
iNB = N6~~ul')d. :
~ = SO~h~Duncf !
~;'.~.P.'!~~.J
~
1::pc'&rs~...-1
trrattic Dlstriblltklli :
[and Atipeiait !-four:
IVohime..nd l
!dil'~h I
.____............J
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION (AM)
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
8
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 100 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Figure 2-Projeet PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution Entering and Exiting
@
mm,.PM Edling PeliR =
Single Family; PM,Enterlrlg
~k=$ 100FJimR .
tOG
N.T.S,
,
,
I
I
~
N~~~10 5B; I
'4WB:'
............................-..,
~ ~ Eastb~uQd ;
ilIIB = NollhtlOund I
isB = Soll/hbllUnd :
iWB=WllSlhound :
..~...........-......-..._.._.
~
:;..~roehlsli8.._..-1
ITraffic DlstrlbUtion :
I:rind PM~P.ea~ Hour!
.VOIume afid, :
.' .
:dlrl!CtIOh '
....__........_......_...._~
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION (Ptv:)
MAGNOLIA POND PUD
9
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 101 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Background Traffic
Average growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network
in the study area using the Transportation Planning Staff Guidance of a 5% growth
rate. Typical growth rate in Collie'r County are in the 2 to 5% range and so this
area is anticipated to experience a higher growth rate. Table 4 illustrates the
application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background
(without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the year 2015.
Table 4-Background Traffic without Project (2007 and 2015)
2007 AUIR Projected Z015 Projected
Peak Hr. Traffic Peak Hr. Peak
Roadway Unk Roadway Unk Peak Dlr Annual Dlr Background
LoeatIon Background Growth Traffic Volume
Traffic Rate w/out Project
Volume
MafillII18Piirid ' proJK.t a.tl'ance to, NtA' JoJl/J\,: ' .'~'
DrIjie , .' ColllerBw.d
Collier Blvd N. of Magnolia Pond 1.540 5% 2,275
., Dr
N, of GoicJen GlIte 1,750 :', S%. 2.s86
,Pkwy
5. of Magnolia Pond 1,540 5% 2,275
Dr
S. ofl.75 . 2;7sQ. 5% .. 4,063
$, of Davis Blvd 2,000 5% 2,955
DelllSiou1im!rlI 'W, of CoIlierBlvd ' 1,410' ~,,: , 2,0l!~
W. of Radio Road 1,410 5% 2,0ll3
l!8d,1O IIciBd W. ofCllYls Blvd 1,(ioP 5% 1,:'\'17'
10
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 102 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Existing and Future Roadway Network
,
,
The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2007 Annual Update and
Inventory Report (AUIR) and the 2015 roadway conditions are based on the
Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2015 Financially Feasible
Highway Network, which was last updated in the MPO 2030 Long Range
Transportation Plan (June 8, 2007) (Appendix E). The 2015 future roadway
network improvements include: The six-Ianing of Collier Boulevard and the six'
laning of Davis Boulevard. The existing and future (2015) roadway conditions are
illustrated in Table 5 and the future roadway conditions are graphically depicted
in Appendix E. The conditions for Magnolia Pond Drive are estimated based on
similar road conditions on other Collier County roadways (i.e. Old US 41 at County
Line).
Table 5-Exlstlng and Future Roadway Conditions
,
,
Exist Peak Future
Roadway Link Roadway Link Location Exist Exist Mln Dfr, Peak Hr 2015
Roadway LOS Std Capacity Roadway
Volume
llililliholle PonG " PrcijectEntran~ to :tU' ",: D " " '" 1,010 'W
, '. ' ~,'
,i>tIve Collier Blvd .'
Collier Blvd N. of Magnolia Pond Dr 40 0 2,450 60
N. ofGo!cJell ~ate PkWy 41> o. ~$O {;O
S. of Magnolia Pond Dr 40 0 2,450 60
~.ofl-7!i . 40 ,,0 ' , $,060 60
' ,
S. of Davis Blvd 60 E 3,270 60
Davlsa<tlilti,;.n1 W.of CollIer Blvd 2U 0 '1,530 60
W. of Radio Road 2U 0 1,530 60
Radl~ Ito,li~ W. clf~viS Bl'!d Ai>. D' ,,' "2100 4D
" .. , . "o"
Table Notes: 2U = 2.lane undivided roadway; 40 = 4-lane dIVided roadway; 60 = 6-lane divided
roadway.
11
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 103 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic impact Statement-December 2008
Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network--Roadway Unk Analysis
and Intersection Analysis
The COllier COunty Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service
(LOS) volumes for the roadway links Impacted by the project were evaluated to
determine the project Impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2015).
Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse
Impacts to the Collier COunty CIE/AUIR area roadway network. The project does
have an impact on Magnolia Pond Drive and this roadway will operate at an
acceptable LOS with the'project.
With the proposed 6-lane Improvements, Collier Boulevard from 1.75 to Davis
Boulevard Is projected to operate below the minimum LOS with or without the
project in the future (2015). We understand that COllier COunty Transportation
Planning staff are exploring the feasibility of 8-lanlng this section of roadway,
which would put it at a satisfactory LOS with and without the project. Table 6
illustrates the roadway link LOS impact with the project and whether the
minimum LOS is exceeded with or without the project.
,
,
The one signalized intersection to be reviewed as part of this project is the
Intersection of Magnolia Pond Drive/COllier Boulevard. This is an existing
signalized intersection and it is operating at an acceptable Level of Service at this
time. Empirically, the project traffic will not have a significant impact on the
signal operations and will not trigger additional intersection geometry lane calls
based on the projected project peak hour volumes (See Figure 3, which follows).
Extensive intersection analysis was performed by Klmley Horn, which included
this project and the results of that anaiysis are enclosed In Appendix H.
,
Per discussions with Collier COunty Transportation Planning Staff, as part of the
future widening of Collier Boulevard, this intersection may be modified to a
directional median opening and the signal would be eliminated. A median island
would be constructed on Collier Boulevard, so that there would be a northbound
left and southbound left from COllier Boulevard onto Magnolia Pond Drive and
Utility Drive, respectively. There would also be right In/right out movements to
12
"
,
.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 104 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
and from Magnolia Pond Drive and Utilities Drive as well. The movements
eliminated from this intersection would be the crossover movement to and from
Utilities Drive to the east and left outs from Magnolia Pond Drive and Utilities
Drive. Project traffic desiring to go to the east (to City Gate,), or north on Collier
Boulevard would be diverted to a loop road within the proposed Abercia Project
and this roadway would align with the existing City Gate North Drive at Collier
Boulevard (See Figure 4, which follows). This location would be signalized. These
major Intersection modifications are contingent on and based on the Abercia
project moving forward. The Magnolia Pond Drive/Collier Blvd intersection
modifications would not be anticipated until the Abercia loop road and signal at
City Gate Drive North/Collier Blvd are In place.
Table 6-Roadway Unk Level of Service (LOS)-With and Without the Project in
the Year 2015
2015 2015 " Min LOS M1nLOS
Peak Dlr, Peak Oir, Volume exceeded exceeded
Roadway Unk Roadway Unk location Peak Hr Peak Hr Capacity without with
Capacity Volume Impact Project? Project?
Volume w/ProJ8Ct By Yes/No Yes/No
Project
MlBnol/a Polld "Project ~ntrance to , ' '
Drive CQlllllf Illvd ' 1,010 946" .. ' , 8,22% No No
Collier Blvd. N. of Magnolia Pond Dr 3,690 2,300 0.7% No No
, N. of Goillen Gat8Pkwy , , .....
. 3,300 2,607, 1).6% No No,
S. of Magnolia Pond Dr 3,690 2~334 1.6% No No
S. of 1-75' 3,690 4,!!9.2 0,8% . Yes Yes.
,S. of Davis Blvd 3,330 2,972 0.5% No No
',DaVIs' W.qfCbIli'er Illvd 3;420 2;696 Q.4% No Nq,
Bouleveld..
W, of Radio Road 3,420 2,090 0.2% No No
Radlcll!Oad ;W:OfDavls ~vd 2,10P 1;48'3 " O.S%, " Nil NO
~. .,.
Table notes: · LOS capacity volumes for future 6-lane conditions of Collier Blvd are based on existing 6-
lane capacity of adjacent sections of Collier Blvd. ""LOS Capacity volume for future 6-lane condition of
Davis Blvd is based on capacity of existing 6-lane section of Davis Blvd (US 41 to Airport Rd).
13
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 105 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traf/lc Impact Statement-December 2008
. Flauio s.:;p~~ P..,k HourTum'lna Mowm8lllB-
. Filii Median OoenlnqwlSianai lit Mlranoll.Pond DrlvalClallilor Blvd
,
,
'Magnolia Flood PUD I
~
~
P~i~~ -'"
~
MAGNOLIA
VTI...IiE>
~R..I VE
~
/.lS
Ii!
~
III
~
14
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 106 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
FIClUI"A .4-Pmiliet FfAak HbU~ :rU'I'nh19 Movements-
D1l'l!ctloiuil MelIl<<" ODenl"o lit Mao"dlla Pond DrI\l'llICtlIlll!lrBIVll
Filii Maclian OoelilnlnitlSlanal at CItV Gala Nortti DrlvaiCOlllal' BlVd
IMagnolla Pond puol
VTll.liES
\:;6
"'8
I
g
ill
g
lS
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 107 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA TraIf1c Impact Statement-December 2008
,
,
Improvement Analysis
The project impacts to the Collier County roadway network are not significant and
are not adverse. The programmed roadway improvements and the additional
efforts being undertaken by Collier County Planning Staff will adequately address
the roadway network adjacent to the project.
The intersections of Magnolia Pond Drive/Collier Blvd, Magnolia Pond
Drlve/Abercla Project Loop Road, and City Gate Drive North/Collier Blvd can be
analyzed in detail and costs apportioned as developments proceed to the
construction permit stage and County Roadway Construction Plans are
completed. The proposed project Is not a significant traffic generator to these
locations.
Mitigation of Impact
The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as
building permits are issued for the proposed project. Under the proposed project
build out development program and based on current impact fees, the project
would pay an estimated $1.4 to $1.8 million dollars in road impact fees (Appendix
F).
The developer will provide the appropriate turn lanes and entry lighting at the site
access intersection on Magnolia Pond Drive in accordance with Collier County
requirements. The extent of these Improvements would be determined at the
time of Development Order review and approval.
The developer will pay its fair share of the cost of a traffic signal (when
warranted) at the proposed intersection of City Gate Drive North/ Collier
. .
Boulevard, or enter into a Developer Contribution Agreement to offset applicable
capacity improvements at the intersection of Magnolia Pond Drive/Collier
Boulevard.
16
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23.2010
Page 108 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Appendix A: Initial Meeting Checklist
(Methodology Meeting and Additional
Notes/Emails)J9 Sheetsl
17
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 109 of 199
APPENDIX A
INITIAL MEETING f'RJi',CJa .TliIT
,
,
Suggestion: Use thia Appendix aa a worksheet to enml'e that no Important elements
are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply.
Date: Aoril14. 2008 an'" follow UD coortlina';on via ","ail Boone wlMichael Green
Time: 1 :30 om '
Location: Collier County Transoortation Services
PeoDle Attendin2:
Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers
I) John potI"7p.rwin.1cv. Collier CountY TransDOrtation. 252-8192
2) Nonnan Trebilcock. Trebilcock Consulthu! Solutions. 566.9551
Study PrePlU'er:
Preparer's Name and Title: Nonnan J. Trebilcock. AICP. P.E.
Organization: Trebilcock Cons"l.;"" Solutions. PA
Address & Telephone Number: 6660 Manl!I'Ove Way. Nanles. FL 34109: 566-9551 ofc:
248-3883 mob
Reviewerlsl:
Reviewer's Name & Title: Jnhn P<''''''7erwin.kv, Proiect Ma""""",
Collier Comty Transportation Planning Department
AnDlicant:
Applicant's Name: Tervl Brzeski c/o Tim Hancock of Davidson Eneineerinl/:.
Address: 3530 Kraft Road. Suite 301. Naples. FL 34105
Telephone Number: 239434-6060
@li~
ProDosed Deve1oDment: ,
Name: MaOTlolia Pond PUDA ~ .III
Location: Located on lv\"almnlia Pond Drive (42.05 ac), anDrOldrnate1v Yo mile west of ~
Collier Blvd (CR 951), iust immediately north of 1.75 in Sections 34 8. Tnwn.hin 498. J '
~- V
Land Use Type: Multi.rnmilv and Sinele rnmilv residential ::rI o.:V '
lTECode#: 230and210.resnective1v t/.:\- l,J" I... ~
Proposed number of development units: 231 mul1i-mmi\v. or 125 silll!:le familv ~ '!:" f.... '1t!J~
Other: _ ~.~ ~
C~IIId~OITIIlIIllfy~l'ttlb/'.toct~~~PoIId~Po/IdI'VDATJS~.ol~A>'
~,~PoIIdPlJ{J4.deo
Page 1 of3
\~
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 110 of 199
Description: The ouroose of the oroiect is to rP.tain the ourrently allowed 231 multi.
family units. while at!tlinll sinllle fAmily units as a nennitted use to the Plannp4 Unit
DevelO1Jment.
Existing ZoBing: Residential PUD (sWlSe!)
Comprehensive plan recommendation: _
Requested: Residential Planned Unit Develonment
Findings of the Preliminary Study:
,
,
Study TvDe:
.
Major TIS .lKl {\
Study Area: '\
Boundaries: Mal!Jlolia Pond Drive.. Collier Blvd.
Small Scale TIS
Minor TIS
o
Additional intersections to be analyzed: Collier Bly'!/Malmolia Pond DrIve as full
shmalized and UIlslonalized directional (r inlr outll in)
Horizon Year(s): ~
Analysis Time Period(s): _
Future Off-Site Developments: Fair share contribution to imnrovemP.t1fs at the
intersection of Collier Boulevard and Mllflllolia Pond DrIve.
Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trin Generation, 7'" Edition
10~
, - ~ ~
Jq ~
~J
,
,
Redudions in Trip Generation Rates:
None: X
Pass-by trips: :MfA
internal trips (PUD): Nt A
Transit use: Nt A
Other:NtA
Horizon Year Roadwav Network Improvements:
.~
Methodolol!V & Assumptions: /l ~""V)
__,_... ll<--~
Site.trip generation: ITE Trip Gen . \ I ~
Trip distribution method: Evallocal traffic TIS' ~ /J Fl"J1 A V
Trafficassignmentmethod:~ \l".1b '!/'''' --JIf?
Trafficgrowthrate:lli~;1 ~~. IS Wj'
c_"'__..~.__.._--""'-"'_.--~
IMIIlIICfOIOW~PVl(/Pt/OA.6l>>
Page 2 of3
,
,
19
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 111 of 199
SDeclal Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience)
Accidents locations: N/A
Sight distance: NlA.
Queuing: NlA
Access location & configuration: Off ofM'A""olia Pond Drive
Traffic control: NlA
Signal system location & progression needs: None. existin2 ";""81 at M8""n\ia Pond Dr
and Collier Boulevard.
On-site parldng needs: Per LDC reauiremenf>l
Data Sources:_
Base maps:_
Prior study reports: R"i<lf:inl1 PUD TIS
Access policy and jurisdiction: MA""olia Pond Drive is a local stteei 8M is an access
road for GoMAn Gate Hi2h. an elemen1Arv school ('mil.... construction) and existine:
residential develomnent.
Review process:_
Requirements: _
Miscellaneous:
,
12.-I-O~
Applicant
Fee--$500 aJready paid,
"
~/IIJlI~~~ClI!SlrDIg~~PMd~PwodPlJt)tTlS~ot~""
~~~PcrtJdPC/DA._
Page 3 of3
?.o
Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology and Trip Distribution
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
p~8~1,i 12 of 199
Nonnan Trebilcock. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA.
From: Nonnan Trebilcock: Sent: Thu, 0412412008 03:09 PM
To: JohnPodczerwlnsky@colliergov.net:
CC: mlehae/greene@colllergov.nel:
Subject: Megnolle Pond PUOA Methodology and Trip Ol8lributlon
Attachments: P"""'...d Mll\Inolle PllIld Olst Map.Q4.24-2008.Ddf: ~1!llllt..TJl~
MethodoJoqv Mestina ADDendlx: A Maanolia Pond PUDA Ddf,
Hi John,
I am attaching an updated methodology and trip distribution based on my follow up and coordination
with Mike. I reviewed the additional TIS' Mike had suggested and was able to use that information for
the project proposed distribution map as well as the revised me1hodology.
The composite map showing the, other study distributions and the proposed project distributions are
attached. I also bave attached an updated methodology that sets the growth rate at 5% and the need to
look at the Magnolia Pond DrICollier Blvd intersection as both a full signalized and an unsignalized
directiOJlal median opening (r in/r outll in at Magnolia Pond Dr). These are additions discussed with
Mike today.
Please let me know iftbis is okay and I will finalize the TIS in accordance with the attached. Thanks
for your help and have a nice weekend.
oN 0JUn
Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E.
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
239-566-9551 Ofc
239-566-9553 Fax
239-246-3883 Mob
al
http://i02,internetoffice.bi7ladminlmaillMessageP.rj.nt.aspx?mid=686
11130/2008
RE: Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Pag'61!ll%1I13 of 199
Norman Trebilcock. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA.
From:
To:
CO;
Noman Trebilcock;
grool@almengr.com;
Sent Wed, 0412312008 09:50 AM
Subject: RE: Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology
Greg,
Thanks for your help and quick rasp.onse. This should work weR for what I am doing. Good
luck with your analysis in this area as well. Thanks again,
.N tJJUtf,
Nannan J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E.
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
239.566-9551 Oft;
239.566-9553 Fax
239-248-3883 Mob
From: Greg Root [groot@aimengr.com]
Sent: 4/23/2008 9:26:33 AM
To: NTrebilcock@Trebilcock.blz
CC: MichaeIGreene@colllergov.net;acorreia@almengr.com;
Subjt!Ct: RE: Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology
Good morning Norm-
I sp~ with Mike Greene late yesterday afternoon and he asked me to send you copies of the two traffic studies
that were conducted by K1mley-Hom & Associates. As I Indicated yesterdey, the one study was conducted for City
Gate Phase I (located on the east side of CR 951 north of 1-75) and the other wes conducted for the Aberela
development (located on the west side of CR 951 north of Magnolia Pond Or). There are project traffic
cl1str1butions included In both of these reports, hOWever, we did not totally agree with these. Part of the work that
AIM conducted for the County Involved calculating a growth rate to escalate the exlsting (2007) peak hour traffic
volumes to the 'openlng year" for our study. Based on the results of a historic: traffic growth trand analysis
conducted using AAOT volumes on CR 951 between 1.75 and SR 84 (obtained from the 2006 FOOT Florida
Traffic Information CD) we recommended a yearly growth rate of 5.15% per year. This growth rate was approved
by the County (Mike Greene) for use in our study and based on my conversation with Mike, he Is ok with this
growth rate being used for your project. I hope this Information helps you. Mike alao told me that If you have any
other questions feel free to give him a call.
Greg.
From: Norman Trebilcock [mallto:NTreblloock@Trebllcock.blz]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:08 PM
To: gl'Ollt@!llmengr.com
Subject: FIN: Magnolia Pond PUOA Methodology
http://i02.intemetoffice.bizladminlmaillMessagePrint.aspx?mid=664
:r;?
1113012008
RE: Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Pa~~eoH4 of 199
,
,
Greg,
It was nice talking to you today and getting your insight into what is happening with traffic in
this local area. Below is the message from Mike if that helps you with figuring out what to
forward me. I appreciate any assistance that you can provide to help us get this moving
along. Thanks,
.N Oftm
Norman J. TrebUcoek, AIel, P.E.
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. P A
239-566-9551 Ofc
239-566-9553 Fax
239-248-3883 Mob
--.--.--.-.---.-.----,---.-----
From: GreeneMichael [MlchaeIGreene@colliergov.net]
Sent: 4/2212008 7:44:42 AM
To: JohnPodczerwinsky@colllergov.net;NTrebilcock@Trebilcock.biz;
CC:
Subject: RE: Magnolia Pond PUDA Methodology
Greg Root@ AlM.just finJslled a LOS study for the {!Dished geometries of Magno1ia Pond/951. H. bas all of the data you
might need to start your TIS for that area.
M.ike
,
,
2.3
http://io2.intemetoffice.bizladminlmai\IMessageP!int.aspx?mid=664
1113012008
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 115 of 199
5. Trip distribution and assignment- Show (on a map) the directional traffic. Include both directions of
traffic on the analyzed link(s). This must be done for the AM & PM Peak hours. Show turning
movement coW1ts at the project driveways as well, since Magnolia Pond is owned by a Public entity.
.~ Y1'/1-~~ 1.--
\~
Respo1l8e: Norm Trebilcock.
6. Staff has requested intersection analysis of Mag. Pond & 951. but the analysis has not been included
in the report appendix, r< ,- ( \\~
J N cL--Uvc G [; tl.~ q C\.v",\ ~ - ~.
_""'............ '" Q C.Gvr\i(')vnt\!O"1 to IISS""'f. ~ .jl
~___!02-~- .. ~o~~~ e~Ch "
http://i02.internetoffice.bizladminlmaillMessagePrint.aspx?mid=2994 ~
/
N orE ~ rJ<oJ"""\ CooRD IN Al1 QtJ
.j\ S:s-r t~b w n\r\ .:tQ\4t0 f' 0 D c:z.. 'E.Rwn.J s'K.(
A~ D t-.jotZ\-'\."'tJ -rR.EB\l-60C-k
<00 \ -e..- 9\ -Q~
,
,
~4
RE: Magnolia Pond RPUD - Transportation Planning Comments
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
~Of199
7. Show on the dis1ribution map(s) the percentage of drop-off at the expressway. This drop-off should
approximate the referenced traflic studies, but should also be pre-approved by staff to be sure it is
reasonable. ~bzA - . J.....
---\\\ It,. ~l::;$
/ Jr.. 4-
,-I c;.~
fP
Response: Norm TrebUcock.
8. Please relocate Appendix H nearer to Table! in the resubmittal (the link impact dis1ribution maps
should follow).
Response: Norm Trebikock.
,
,
9. Table 4- Please provide more information supporting the background traflic growth rate. If
necessary, adjust to the actuaJ growth rate using the 1atest AUIR data (or minimum 2%, whichever is
greater).
Response: Norm TrebUcock.
\v'v' ~.
\~ . ~ v.
tJ
10. Project Impact analysis- Please be sure to lII18Iyze the project for 2%..20/0-3% impacts on the first,
second, and lhiI:d links, reSpectively. The narrative states that ii is 2% 1 st link, then 3% second link,
Also, ifV/Cis over 1.00 butless than 1.10 for the adjacent link, then no impacts greater than 1%
can be considered. Narrative SfatClpel1ts the guideline requirements are not necessary though,
and can be removed from the report.
Response: Norm TrebUcock.
11. Table 6- Please use current AUIR volumes unless a project is under contract to be constructed, or a
date is known for construction c011llDencement; or a DCA is in effect that grants concurrency to the
proj~t. ~
'A V' t"'^~
~. I. Go"j -:'\~~ Cl!>"2:;:>-'(
Response: Norm TrebUcock. '-...) ! cE!3
; 25 Z.Of"~
http;l/io2.internetoffice.blzladminlmaillMessagePrlnt.aspx?mid=2994 1113012008
, ,RE: Magnolia Pond RPUD . Transportation Planning Comments
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
~Of199
,
,
12. Methodology notes FYI: The attached notes ue not signed by staff. The study type is not
indicative of this "major" TIS (something that would normally impact the fees except this project
predates the adoption of the fee schedule), 9/27/06 ~cw Comments: Application is found to be
inconsistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element of the OMP. However, contact
Transportation Planning to participate in a DCA to fund Davis Blvd. improvements. Collier County
Transportation may require an update of the TIS to the most ~ avai!f'ble.
-rV\\"t'\\b~~:':(. &,vh~. 9'Ae:~
~Io'f \f1A- Le6J l'\(>~
RespollSe: Norm Tl'ebllcock. 1#-( ~I ~- - Jr
~tl~"f'I*1 -tfr r'
13. In Exhibit "F", Section "3. Traffic" in the PUD document, please add the following paragraph: "E. A
minimum throat lcngfu of I 00' shall be maintained at any gated entrance."
Response: P1e/JSe see the revised PUD docllllfent.
The throat length ~uage suggested by Stqff h/JS been provided /JS subsectJDn C
14. Revise paragraph 'A" to state the following: "A. This project may not receive Development Order
approval until fair share oon1ribution towards planned intersection improvements at the Magnolia
Pond and CR-951 intersection have been approved and accepted by Collier County."
Response: (DE)?? Are we ok with this?
IS. S1rikeparagraph "B", itisrcdundantto codercquirements,
RespollSe: Pleizse see the revised PUD document.
,
SubsectJDn B h/JS been stricken per StaJJ's suggestlolJ.
16. Keep paragraph "C" with regard to the capacity and treatment of roadway runoff.
e.,
http://i02,intemeloffice.biz/adminlmailfMessagePrintaspx7mid=2994
~it~O/2oog
Appendix B: Project Site Map,
And Site Aerial (2 Sheetsl
'2.1
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 118 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Magnolia Pond PUDA
27-4$-26
8IlDEIIIIltllllY
llIlUIIII GUt-.
-..
--
,- 71
33-49-26
04-50-28
03-50-28
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Page 1 of 1
28
28-49-28
35-49 26
02-50-26
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 119 of 199
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 120 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Tra/flc Impact Statement-December 2008
29
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 121 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Appendix C: Project Master Concept Plan
11 Sheetl
30
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 122 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Trafflc Impact Statement-December 2008
,
,
\i III II II! 1 ] It "I'
. ' . ~~ . -
I --- ~ C:::L"" I i
f ~ ....... ' ~
~ I d ~,' ",,"',' / \ I~ I
\ I \. It "\1' I
; ,_J \ I ) lJ <, I II I
" ' " /
...... /' ...
Eli ,,--------
~_.,..-~v (?________~~\
\ ~" ttl .. I I.
. " e ~. ,I)
__Je__j ~=======::~
\
\
\
\
\
\
.f!fn'l
I mml
, I,IIIII!
---
----
illl! Ijll!!ii~lll!m:ll r
"iii.!lilll\..il.!i
1,1 . ~1:1!I:i1
, .'..
::::
~W r.
.:. Hi
T
!
, i
In
I
o
:;(
, ~ ~
I
\
31
I
! II!
I,f
,
i
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 123 of 199
Magnolfa Pond PUDA Traffic fmpoct Statement-December 2008
Appendix 0: ITE Worksheet for Selecting
Between Trip Generation Average Rates
and E~ations (2 Sheetsl
32
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23.2010
Page 124 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Appendix D: Sinol~etacMdJ:lousing IIEJ..U Code 210
FIgure 9,1 Raoommenclecl Proced.... for
Seleotlng Between TrIp GeIlOI'Ol/on Average _ and Equatlone
,
,
10 1TIi......_uonl_"""~."1 of.2.
.
33
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Aooendix D: Res. Condo./Townhouse ITE LU Code 230
F1gu.. 8.1 Recommended Procedu.. for
SelectIng SalWeen 7I1p a_ratio" Average Ratea 8IICI &quationll
,
,
10 ITl! .'\1ip""""'''''''I_,,,,,,,Ed1tIcp.~ of2
.
34
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 125 of 199
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 126 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Appendix E: 2015 and 2030 Collier County
Roadway Network Financially Feasible
Plans (2 Sheetsl
3S
MagnolIa Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
2O.!fwog1lllnpTm.."._, P"', .
,
,
118.....,)..7
18'5 FiI:IaocbIb' ,...... R....9M)'....
...-
--
..
!
I
I
. ,
I
,
~l
I
I
I
,
R
"
...'......J.:'
-2
-4
-6
-6
-'0
'(I)O~TJ>
36
~
~,
.' ~,_..
I
.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 127 of 199
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 128 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December ZOOS
2030 to"lR..,. n....".,tltIfImI P/ml ..
FfgotclN
20300IaItr.IulIUIlI ~........., teulbla'laa
~ ."
~
.
.
.
~3IlL.ft'f'
--
....
"'IlIIIIdJlllltlI,1IllI1'
37
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic impact Statement-December 2008
,
,
Appendix F: Impact Fee Calculation
Summary Sheets
,(2 Sheets}
,
,
38
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 129 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Aooendlx F: CoHler County Imoact Fee Calculator Imoact Fee
Calculation SummarY
Use: Multi-FamilY CondolTownhouse
location; CoI0.r County (Default)
Fire District: Golden G.~
Uvfl"ll Arel Sq. Ft. per Unft: 1800
Total Area Sq. R. perUnlt:2400
,
,
~ of Units: 231
tl of Floors: 2
Common Ants Sq. Pt,: 2-00
utnitv Impaet fn NOT INCW DED, Plelle contaCt Utllltles.t 152-2571 for ~r
and sewer Impact fees,
Impact Fee COst
Parks Resicnal$440,713.SS
Parks ComMunity$199 ,287 .50
Ubrlry$93,044A9
Rre$13S,650,DO
School$725,249.91
ROIldS1.&15 U8,:U
JanS26,19S,40
Ermrgencv MecReaI ServlCt'$28,935.0&
Gowrnment Bullding$103,99158
Law Enforc:ement$43,012.20
Tolal FeeS.6t.4347.61
1
39
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 130 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
ADDendlx F: ColDer Countv ImDllct Fee Calculator ImDact Fee
Calallation Summarv
Use: Home.-Sln21e FamHv
Lot.tIon: CoIlleteounty (Oofeu~)
Rre District: Golden Gate
Uvlng Area S~. Ft. per Unit: 2100
lotlll Are. Sq. Ft. pet Unit: 2800
I of Units: 125
Utltfty Impvtt fee NOT INCWDED, Please cont8ct Utilities et 7!2~2571 forW1lter
and aewer Impact fe.,.
Impact Fee Cost
Parks ReslomllS326,fSOO.oO
Parle Communlty$147,631.25
Ubr.ry$69,230.00
FlreS87 ,500.00
SchooISl,262,972.S0
D-AIl!1..UO,HB 7S
Jell$3O,187.50
Ernel'leney MedJeel Servlce$15,6S'1.50
Government BUlldlngS110,761.25
18w Enforcement$43,067.SO
TfIt.tlJtgb Sn.'A2S,Z5
2
40
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 131 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
,
,
Appendix G: ITE Land Use Code
Description Sheets
12 Sheetsl
,
,
41
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 132 of 199
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 133 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
.--
Land Use~ 210
Single-Family Detached Housing
Description
S1ng_mlly ~ hClUIing IncIud.. all olngl..famIIv dola_ hom.. on lndiYlduallolB. A
lYPloel otta ourvoyod ... au"""" subdivision.
Additional Data
Tho number 01 vehlcl.. and raoIclom hove a high _on with s"_W08IllIay vohk:Io VIp
onda. Tho... of.... vari_1s 1lmll8cl, however, _... n"",_oI,,-, and
-- woo often dllllcult1D _ or _. Tho numborof_ng IMlIts Is ganal8lfyuaad
.. tho Indepondont_ or _ _ 110 .....1Iy I1IlldIy ...._, ..syte project and
haoah/gll__a_waekday_trlpendo.
Thla land 0801_ dota Imm a Wide VlIlioty of.nilll wlIh dIII'e_ _, prIco _
I~ and agoo. ConooquenUy,Ihere waa 8 wide variation In tripa gan_ wIlhIn thfo
catagory. "" OJCpeCtod. dwoIIng units thall'l8l8/o1gar In size, 1110I8 """"""",, orfarlher away
from tha central bual,.. dlol1lcl (CBD) hod 8 higher nllo oftrlp gonal'.II." per unll than _
.maDer In slza,la.. exponIlvo. 01' 010....10 tha C8D. Olhor _,such.. geographlc_n
and !ype of acfJ800nt end noarby dOllOlopmanl. may 0180 have had an _ on tha otta tI1p
generation.
S1ngle4am11y dotaohBd .1lI1a had the hlgheat trip g&ner8l1on rate per dwelling unit of 1lIl_1aI
1M$, b__ they went the largoat unIlo In size ""d hod ..... ...1cIonte and '""'" WIhlcle$ per
unit than other raoIclonlIaIland _ they wara gan&raIIy located IarlhOl' away rtom lIhopplng
COIltara. ompIoyment..... and olhor ItIp allt8C1OIlI than other _ar land ....; and they
gen"""ly had Iawor ...mate modes of tran.POIla1lon avollablo, be..... they..... ~caIIy not
.a cx;>noentrated 81 other re8ldentlelland U8eS.
The poak hour of tho goneratorlyploeSy coInOlded with the peak hour of"'. adjacent _01 \raffle.
Th. _ 1'18I8 oUrYel"'d rtom tho Iote 1980s 10 t!lo 2000.1hlTlUghout tho United 8llIte. .nd
C.ned..
Source Numbers
1,4, S, 6, 7. 8,11.12, 13. 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 34, 35, 36. 38.40, 71. 72, 84, 91, 98.100, IOS.
1OS,110. 114, 117, 119, 157,167, 177. 187,192.207,211,248,275.283,293,300.319,320.
357,384,435.550,552,579
T,*, Go""ralion, 71h Edition
2611
Inslllute of r.....po_ Engl...."
42
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 134 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
,
,
Land Use: 230
Residential CondomlnlumlTownhouse
Description
_dentl.' con_lurn_hous...... d_ ... owna..h1o unIIJ that hava.t laoat one
__ unJ\ _In th....... bulldlnll sIrUClUtII. _ condomlnl..... and town_....
InoIudod In 1111, _ UI8. Tho _In thla land _ did nolldenl1fy_.rtho
conllomil1lulT1ollownhu... __ _ orhlgh....... Low-<I8e residential
condomlnlum/loWnhouse (Land u.. 231~ hlgh-rIH ...8Idantlal condominlumltownhou.. (Land
Use 232) and IlJXUryconclomlnlumltownhouBe (Land u.. 233) .......tod land _I.
Additional Data
Tho number of _s and lho numbar of realclsnlS Ilsd a hiQh IlOfI'IlaIIon _ "",,"g8 weekd.y
vehicle lrfp ando. The use of Ihesa var1ablel wasllmllod, however. because lho number of
_also and _ _ often d1lltoult to _n or predict. Tho numllBr of dwelling unlla waa
genallli1y usad ..the Indepandant """_ 01 cholco __ K ill usually ....dlty awIloh1e, ..ay
to projecl.nd hod. hiQh _n _ avarage -.y vShIcle lrfp snds.
Th. peak hour of 1ha ganeralorlyploally coincided with lhs peak "- oflhe edI_nt _ tJafflc.
Tho slteo _ surveyed ftom tho mld.l97OS 10 lho 20008 throu9houllhe United Stete, and
Conod..
SOllrce Numbel'll
4.92,94.95,97,100, 105,106.114, 166.166.204.237.253,293,319,320,321,390,412.416,
561, 662. 563
Trip Geno""Ion, 7th Edlllon
366
Ino1ltule ofT",nopoflotIon Engln....
43
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 135 of 199
Magnolia Pond PUDA Traffic Impact Statement-December 2008
Appendix H: Excerpts from Intersection
Analysis Data Prepared by Kimley Horn-
Collier Blvd Corridor Study
!October 2006812 Sheets),
44
N
NOTTOSCALE
-.
war
(D_ BlVd)
~~=r..."""
-- .
'"
III ! H
.....
182 .t
43~
188 '"
!!~
.....
267.t
42~
383'"
l:; 10
f!.~
.. '"
...
..
1ft
..
fJ
~ ..
<ill!
...
SOB .t
1,314 '"
~ ~ 81
..:N....
.....
1,163 .a
157 ~
283'"
t;. 819
.... 123
.. 1171
..t..
~!\!!
t;. 911
.... 248
.. 1,1183
..t..
~ I!! ~
.,:
.. 243
.. 274
..t
~~
.. ::l-
t..
~l!3
.,
t;.28O"
.... 155
"90
..t..
! ~ f
..
4-5
.....-
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 136 of 199
I SCENARIO #1 I
SIGNALIZED
FULL ACCESS
~
D
I.
\IIlmpII
1-75 51
mpa
-....
DRAFT
2015 P.M. Peak-Hour
lnt8raect1on TrafIIc Volume.
.............
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 137 of 199
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT
CR t511l: Magnolia Pond Drive/UtIlIties Drive
TRAFFIC CONTROLI
COUNT DATEI
SIgnalized
July 12. 2005 . Pebru8ry 18, 20041I
"EXIm8li TRAPPIC"
RawT_'.. _aollllt_
p.u .IIIUII Q......AIIIIL r.ctDr
EBL
ofT
1.20
I!8T
IBR WBL WBT W8R NIL
IlII 176 80 It
1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
NBT NU.
107
1.20
SIlL
30
1.zo
ZIIlNI PIAIt-lEAlON VOWMEll
H
71 litO
II t7 I,N'I I. II 'III It
"NON-PROJECT TIlAPFJC"
E8L EST EBR WIL WBT WIItt NBL NBT NBR 5JL SBT aBR
CRIM_.IIol,_ 1<0 :II 2M va 301 lOt .. 100
CRm_.p_.a.r II ... III .oz .. lQ
CRIM_.IIII,_ 21 1,lSI ID '/t4 lID lIlIO '" 1011
CR 1M _.-.... ... ... .... 048 ... ....
_lIl'~H 1114 '"
_"""'__IlIIa,oI '1 4D ...
TOTAl. VDTI!D TIlAFFJC 191 012 at I,m ZIIJ 780 3A 147 84t 1118 1.1lIt I.
v_,.. -"-(2015) 8. I 8 8 8 8 8 8 . 8
v....,__ 4JltI 4.0% 4JltI 4.0% 4JltI 4.ot1 4.ot1 4JltI 4,0% 4.0%
RIACUlUJUND TRAFFIC GIlOWTtI 20 28 78 86 24 III 48 13 272 2ll
2015 NON-PRO:lICI'TRAFFIC
m a 311& ~ ZIIJ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ m
"TOTAL TRAFI'lC"
201S TOTAL TIIAI'I'IC
ElL EBT IIBR WBL
267 42 III 1,tIQ
NIT NBR SIL SIT SBR
1,'11I 11IO l!Il8 2,1. 24e
__11I014
4'b
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 138 of 199
HeM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peal< . Scenario 1 Recommended
2: Maanolla Pond Dr & CR 951 2015 To1aI TnslIk; Condlllone
..} - .... (" - 4... " t I' \. ~ 4'
l.8ne ConlIgundlons '1'1 ~
Ideal FlDw ('/pIlpI) 1900, 1900 1900 11lllO 1110O 1900 18llO 1900 1900 1900 1800 19O1l
Tol8I Losltlme (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
l.8ne UIlI. FaclDr 0.97 1.00 1.00 om 1.00 1.00 O~7 o.e8 1.00 1.00 0..86 1.00
FIt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
FIt I'rolBclIed 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.llIl 1.00 1.00 0.115 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Said. Row (pI'ol) 3433 1883 1583 S433 1863 1583 S433 8408 1583 1770 6408 1583
FIt PennIl18d 0.17 1.00 1.00 0A3 1.00 1.00 l\.O9 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00
Sald. Row (penn) 2780 1863 1583 1571 1863 1583 323 6408 1583 183 64118 1583
VoIume(vph) m 4Z 883 1_ 248 911 464 1785 620 208 21113 24fl
Paek-hour 1acIor, PHF 0.95 D..95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Ad). FlDw (vph) 281 44 403 2088 25ll 11511 478 1818 541 219 un 25lI
RTOR ReduolIon (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0
l.8ne Gro\Jp FIoIV (vph) 281 44 402 21166 259 821 478 1818 541 219 '12.77 2lIII
TumType pm+pt pm+ov pm+pl Penn pm+pl pm+ov pm+pt pm+ov
P.~ Phaaes 7 4 & 3 8 5 2 3 1 8 7
PermIl\8d PhaaeII 4 4 8 8 2 2 8 0
Mlual8d G_, G (s) 7.2 3.2 24.2 72'.2 &2.2 62.2 65.8 46.8 10l1.8 51./1 38.8 42.8
Eft'ec11v8 Green, II (s) 11.2 5.2 28.2 74.2 64.2 64.2 67.8 46.8 113.& 55.8 40.8 4fl.8
AGIIl8Ied riC RatIo 0.07 0.03 0.111 0.49 0.43 0.43 0.45 0.33 0.78 0.37 0.27 0.31
CIeonnce Time (s) 8.0 e.o 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 e.o 0.0 e.o e.o 6.0 8.0
VehIcle Eldoonalon Is) lI.O 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 s.o s.o 3.0 3.0
l.8ne Grp Cap (vph) 234 85 298 1584 187 678 623 2OlI6 1201 227 1743 <184
via Rallo !'rOt 0.05 D.02 llO.21 cO.al 0.14 0.12 0.29 0.20. 0.10 00.38 0.D2
vIs Rallo Perm 0.04 0,05 cO.D8 0.52 0.23 0.15 0.28 0.14
vh; Rallo 1.20 0.88 1.85 1.30 0.32 1.21 0.17 0.90 0.46 0.96 1.31 0.52
UnIform Delay, d1 89.1 71.0 60.9 35.8 28.5 42.9 57.1 46.3 e.7 65.2 54.8 42.4
PRlgreaIlOII FlIolDr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 0,8$ 0.42 0.86 0.83 0.65
Incremenlal Delay, d2 123.9 24.4 177.9 141.8 0.2 108.4 4.7 5.7 0.2 40.1 140.9 0.7
Delay (8) 193.0 96.0 238.8 117.4 28.7 151.3 64.3 39.1 3.D 95.5 175.0 28.3
Level of Service F F F F C F E D A F F C
Appn:illel1 Delay (s) 212.5 158.0 38.4 154.9
AppJOach LOS F F D F
, -- .r '. t~.t ~~,. '1 ~ .. ." ,7. '. .... -'-';':'wi
... ;. " ';,.. 11"0,. ~, ',~," ~,l-~H:: I~"t;';. '''-''~'''''J/,('.;o.
HCM Average Control Delay 124.7 HCM l.eval of ServIce F
HCM Volume to Capeclib< ratio 1.31
Aciuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost lime (s) 12.0
IIlI!lr8l!QlIon CaplIcIly UllImtklft 121.1% IOU Level of s.mce H
Analysis Period (mln) 15
c Crilio8IlAneGIOIlP
H:1048849017. Aberclal2OlllHl9. OR 951 Analysla\2D16 AnalysIa\1- Magnona Fu1ll20151- Magnl\\ladf1Slt 811W1 .. ay7
KImIayHnm Page 2
41
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 139 of 199
Arterial Level of Service
PM Peak. Scenario 1 Reoommended
2015 Total TIIIIIIc CondIllons
Arterllll Level of ServIce: NB CR 951
45
*
45
23.9
111.1
18.1
....
Arterial Level of ServIce: sa CR 951
tf:Ill48&49017 - AbercIa\200ll-OIl . CR 951 Anall'l'lo\2015 Analyals\1- Magnolia Fu1\20151- MagIlIljIadfIoII...........aY7
KimIey Hom Poge 1
'4f>
N
NM108CAU!
-
I.
tl
I (15,772)
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 141 of 199
I SCENARIO ft I
w.,. ...-
PARTIAL SIGNALIZED
j. tl 1 (S7,H1) ACCESS
oi
i
i
I. tl 1tn.tHl
-
1-75
rIII~ ~ !no.
~2001 .
I.~ti
i
!i.
s
(De"'" Blvd)
I.
60
t~
J
t~
s
1 (77'-)
J,.7SSS
...
1(81,213)
--
1 (6C,4241
DRAFT
2015 Dally Roadway
TndIIc VolulMl
-....
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 142 of 199
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT I
CR 951& Magnolia Pond Drlve/utftltles Drive
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
COUNT DATI!:
SIgnalized, RI/W8 Dlndtonal AcceN
JUly 12, 2001110. February 16, 2006
:IIlO1 PUIt-RAlOR VOWME8
K ffI 1,111f'1
&BL UT _
ao 62
l.:ao 1.20
"
WIlli, NaL NIIT
80 "
1.20 1.20
,
,
'ElWI'J'ING TIlAFI'IC"
Raw TurnIng Men Imlntceuntll
_.........COl. -:>"",._
EIIL EST EIIR
'" &9
12.0 1.20
7t
so 711 ea
"NON-I'ROJECI' TRAFPJC"
I!8L EST _ W8L WIlT WIll, NBL NIIT 11I11, 88L laT -
CRllItWool.Ne!,_ 124 101 "" ns 111I
CR N1 WM\.1'In-by lit \lZ .e2 olI2 \lZ
OR utEUloNe!,._ I.lst .,.. IIl1> lICIO 118 at6
CRtIt _.-.., ... 48 ... 48 ... ...
_oI~7G 124 118
--....---.. -Gll
DhwaIon d... Gofdu GIll..... 1-... ... 42
TOTAL YISTllD TRAl'FIC -Gll 2811 11f17 700 ~ 347 34t II1l1 1,188 162
v.... To ...1IlI0Ul: (aOII) . 9 9 9 9 I 9 . , , , 9
Yoady-- 4.0% 4.0% 4.o~ 4,1)% 14.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4,1)% 4.0%
BAClKGROUND 'I1IAI'I'lC GROWTH 20 28 7G 811 24 3fl 4il 13 2'12 2l!
:&0.15 NOII.pRml!C'l' TIlAPl'IC
20
an 1,us
1111 4S4 1,7" _ l/lIlI 2,1" :Me
"TOTAL TRAI'I'IC"
2015 TOTAL TRAme
EBL 1ST 1M waL WIlT WIll NBL "BT NBR &BL SBT .aR
20 an 1.111 911'" 1.181 UI ZOI 2t181 241
5'
....--..
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 143 of 199
HeM Slgnallz'8d IntersecIIon Capacity Analysis PM Peak. Scenario 2 Recommended
2: Magnolia Pond Dr & CR 951 2015TotaI TrafIIo Condl1lolll
..I- -+ ")0 or - , ~ t ~ ',. ~ .J
~ConllgU.-m1
IdillII....MllIlI1 1IIIIlQ ,. 'l1lllIl tIIGQ ... .. .. 1 . ..
ToI8I LoIt time (I) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
l4aUL ..... - 0.11 UlD QJl1 IlIlIl -i.llD 1.l1Q :aa 1.
Frl 0.85 1.DO o.as 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 o.as
Plf:~ !,><:,rj 1. UII 1. a.w I. ,t. o. tM iJII
SlIId. Flow (plot) Zl/ff 3433 1583 3438 6408 1683 1770 8408 1583
",rill.. <r . 1J)lJ IlJIi 1.!11 \lilt 14Ilt 1,. ... '... '\AD
SlIId. Flow (perm) Zl/ff 3433 1583 :rz1 6408 1583 1770 6408 1583
~<lIPiii 0 8 - .. 1l 811 - .. ., .. *I8l M
P4IIIlt-hourflntor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.95
A4F/ailif{VJlll)' .Q It - 2IlIIIt 0 .. m - "' Z'I& 21ff1' .
Rl'0R ReducIion (vph) 0 0 1911 0 0 475 0 0 0 0 0 0
.......FIIIW !IIIItIJ II 0; WI IDlII O. 4Il4 4VI .. W 211.." ..
Turn Type cualom Pro! cualom pm+pl Perm Prot Perm
F\.J\ r.l: Il'IIIel!e ~ t t ~ I e'
Permllllld PhaNa 7 2 2 2 6
...."" . GlnIiRlt, BQI) 1&.D 76.lJ .&7.0 lIU .... .ctll 14.0 ... o45Jl
EffecIIws~, gee) 77J1 77.0 61.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 16.0 47.0 47.0
..... !llIi4ll1C-~ 11.51 1).$1 1l.41 o..s- ll.llll 0.Jll 0." 0.3l Q.3'l
Cle8nmce nne (e) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
VtNIIli E.JIillllkln ClI) ~ lI.D &0 tAl af. U U &II -.0
L8ne Grp Cap (vph) 1431 1762 686 417 1922 475 169 2008 4911
"*'.. Pnll aMo cOJl8 o.H 0.2Il alM:t IlO.38
vis Rallo Perm 0.07 0.23 0.34 0.35 0.16
vii: RrIlIo 0.14 1.17 0.71 1.1li oa 1.16 1.1& ",3 Q.$lI
Uniform Delay, d1 19.2 36.5 37.0 70.2 52.0 52.6 fiT.o 51.5 42.3
...... r......... 1.00 1.011 Mill CW 1. 1. 1'- 1.41 'I..l\6
In..,."....ntal Delay. d2 0.0 84.1 3.3 68.8 14.0 68.7 101.5 84.6 0.6
IlIIl&y ~ 1tJ! 120.lI ,4lI.3 If;U G"" 141).'1" '17U 1"''' 6U
LM Ot Service B F 0 F E F F F E
~DIlIIr(lI) 1ll.l1i .".. 84A 131llf
AppI08Ch LOS B F F F
HeM AII8I1Ig8 ConIro/ Delay 103.2 HCM level of Servloe F
tAf~lllC'lI*,_ 1~
Aolu8led Cyde l.englh (s) 150.0 Sum of 1ost1lme (B) 8.0
IIllIr 1M)"\. '.~h 111);7% iCU 1.lIMII1I.... 'H
Analylis Period (mln) 15
Q. CdllneI~
,
,
H:I046848017 -Abercla\2006-011- CR 951 AneIysfs\2015 AnaI)'llis\2- Magnolia Partial\2015 2. M4i....BAIIlIIj.;IIb Imps.ay'
K1m1ay Horn Page 1
. .52.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 144 of 199
Arterial Level of Service
PM Peak. Scenario 2 Recommended
2015 Tol8I TrafIic CondIIIon8
" ArterIal Level of Service: NB CR 961
4S
84.3
...
1).17
.oM
5.8
".5
u-.Dr
CIty GIite Drive Nor! II
T'" II
Arterial Level of Service: sa CR 951
9.4
181.1
,
,
H:\D48649017 .AberclaI2O~- CR951 AnaIyala\2015 AnaiysIaI2. MagnoII8 P8rlIall2ll15 2. MlIib IkHIIldjJlIL Imps.sy'
Klmlev Horn Page 1
E;~
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 146 of 199
N I SCENARIO tI3 I
':l: tl
NC1rlOlCH.1!! j. t (H,a11l
..
-
way .... va",
DIRECTIONAL
I. tl t (77,707) LEFT IN/RIGHT INI
RIGHT OUT
.tl
,
,
-- u
-
~. tl t (78,1481
.tl
..
I.; .... t (77,8291
t!:
J
1-75 sa
mpa
, ~. tj
, t (11,293)
.!!l -
(_ Blvd)
I.
t~
.tl
t(l4,424)
r:::J.~ ~~':'!". - Inc.
~- .
DRAFT
2015 Dally RoadwllY
Traffic VoIu_
..--
65
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 147 of 199
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT
CR 951 Ir. Magnolia Pond Drive/UtIlIties Drive
TRAJIIIIC CONTROL:
COUNT DATI!l
Two-Wey STOP
July 12, 2005 Il Februery 16, 2006
............. TRAFPIC"
... TllIIIIq __ CouJOta
PHIl -l n GIN! d h Factor
E8L I8T IlIR W8L war waR lIBL NBT NllR SBL S8T SBR
47 lllI1710 lOA 10710 112
1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
~
20M PIAK-IIA8OIII VOWMl!ll
'NDN-PRO.JECI'TRAFPIC"
E8L I8T UR W8L war _ NIL NIT NIR &8L I8T S8R
ClIU11Weot.IIoI,_ 1M 301 ... 301 1110
CllIIII1_.PIIMy 12 ll2 ... .fa 82
CllIII1_.IIoI,_ 714 150 IDO 11. .....
llRIII1Eu1.-" .. oil .. 411 ...
._al~71 124 118
--....--- ... 4'1. .to
_....Io__l....... . .. oil
TOrN. YI!IITID TIlAFI'IC a 2lI8 - 0 710 au "'7 a.l6 111 2,077 lea
".... TO .......nlt (101S) 8 8 8 8 8 8 . . . .
y-,--- .un; 4.05 <4.OlI ...,. <4.OlI 4..,. <4.OlI ...,. ~ ...,.
IlACKCIIlOUND 'IlW'I'IC GIlOW'l1f 20 :Ill 71 :IS 1M 381 48 18 m 22
I .2.lI15_r r'lKTTIW'I'IC ~
"TOTAL TRAPFIC"
ZOJ.5 TOrN. 'IlW'I'IC
EBL EeT EIR WIlL waT waR NIL NaT NBR SBL SIT S8R
20 m 71 8 ~ ~ ~ _ 2lI8 ~ _
....-..
56
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 148 of 199
17 0
RESoumON 04-~
A RESOWTION BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COUJER COUNTY. FLORIDA.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COl.UER COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 98-49
KNOWN AS MAGNOLIA POND PUD, BXTBNDING THE
CURRENT PVD APPROVAL TO JlJNE 9, 2005: AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATa
WHEREAS. !be Magnolia Pond PUD. OIdID8llC. 98-49 adopted on Ju.. 9. 1998 is
.ubjoctto Ibe provisions of Section 2.7.3.4.. of the Land Development Cod. (!.DC), Tlmc UmiIB
for Appnwed PUD Zoning Disuicts logelber with their ....poctlve Maslet PIano; IlJId
WHEREAS. lbe PUD w.. adopted conlistent with and under the provisionl of the Collier
County Growlh Management Plan; and
WIIBREAS. the Board of Counly COmml..lo.... he. ",viewed th. PUD exten.ion
petition. identified as PUDEX.2CJ04.AR..slI97. filed by Gary Butler. of Botler Engineering. Inc..
"'p.....'lling Teryl H. Bruski, ..queldng an extension of the Magnolia Pone! PUD per LOC
Section 2.7.3.4.6. and have d.termined to cxtend the corrent PUD Zoning for IWO (2) yeanI, ontll
Jun. 9. 2005.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COUJER COUNTY. FLORIDA that:
I. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as If fully SOl forth herein.
2, Tbis Rcsolulion shall constitute. evidence of compliance with the review requirements
of Section 2.7.3.4 of th. LOC.
3. Pursuant to ,aid ,""tion of th. LOC. the current PUD approval is hereby cxtended ,10
Jone 9. 200S.
Thil R...lution is effective immediately opon Its adoptlon.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thi, Resolution b. recorded in the minutes of thi..
Board and In the records of the Petition for which the eXlension II granted.
This Resolution adopted after motion. secood and majori.y vote.
Pagel ora
,s.l ~
Do""lbi'~daYof #.1.
- ,
ATI'I!ST:
DWIOHT E. BROCK, Clerk
'l.\.u..;~ .
,...c.; .....h., 4.:-
il.: ~~(J Oc
l7'f ... .. I
~', At~,~..c;;i.lliillan's
.... .1:9~11"'=-
'.1"'" . .
,~'11:: ~., . '..'. .
. ';.:;. "..,:... ," :'.. ~
ApproveiI'8s'lllfiiii\ and Legal SuffICiency:
Patrick O. White
Asoi.tant County Auomey
~.2ol2
17 0
,2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COU-IBR COUNTY. FLORIDA
BY: ~~ d..1l.
A PlALA. CHAIRMAN
.......l.2.IL
~d'HI.()~
~ ~.7.7.o1
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 149 of 199
Ay,,,,dCi It"", r~u. li'A
February 23,2010
Page 150 of 199
..
RESOLUTION 06.-3.6.-
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.02.13.0. OF THE COLLIER
COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (ORDINANCE NO. 04-
41), AS AMENDED, AFFECTING ORDINANCE 1998-49 KNOWN
AS MAGNOUA PONDPUD, DBNING THE EXTENSION OF
SAID ORDINANCE AND REQUIRING THAT THE APPLrCANT
SUBMIT AN AMENDED PUD DOCUMENT; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Magnolia Pond PUD, Ordinance 98-49 adopted on June 9, i998 is subject to
the provisions of Section 10.02.13.D., of the Land Development Code (LDC), Time Limits for
Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Plans; and
WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and Wlder the provisions of" the Collier
CoWlty Growth Management Plan; and '
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the,PUD and has determined to
deny the request to extend the current PUD Zoning.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of compliance with the review requirements
of Section I 0,02. 13.D. of the LDC.
3. Pursuant to 'said Section of the LDC, the current PUD approval is hereby denied.
4. The applicant shall submit an amended PUD document to the Zoning and Land
DevelopmentReview Departm\lnt within six months of the date of this hearing.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board and
in the records of the Petition for which the extension is granted.
This Resolution ado~ed after motion; second and majority vote.
Done this ;.yiiy of h rk4r 006. ' '
A TTES.n:~':'~DI.~;'::"';~
~".......... "';c- ~'-
DWlG)'ff~l.3:; BROe~~.erk
'BO D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.;
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,2010
Page 151 of 199
JUH ',I, 2006
May 25, 2006
coIllER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
. Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
2800 North Horseshoe Drive 0 Naples, Florida 34104
, Butler EngineeriIlg, !ne
Gary Butler
2223 Trade Center Way
Naples, FL 34109
,Reference: PUDEX-2005-AR-7824, Magnolia Pond PUD
"'~Mr. Butler: ,
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners heard and DENIED
Petition No. PUDEX-2005-AR-7824. A copy of Resolution No. 06-36 is enclosed denying this
use. .
Please be advised that Section 10,03 .OS.B.3, of the Land Development Code requires ,an applicant
, to remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County
Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing
advertising sign(s) immediately. . ,
If you have any questions, please contact me at 213.2958.
~~,
, Melissa Zone
Principal Planner
MZIhr
Enclosure
00: Pawe1 and Teryl Brzeski, 5147 Seahorse Avenue, Naples, FL 34103
Land Dept. Property Appraiser (Site Plans)
Addressing (peggy Jarrell)
Customer Service, M'myAnn Devanas
M. Ocheltree, Graphics
Files (Records & Planning Dept.)
Front Desk Planner (if PUD)
c
o
, ~~ ~.,. CON."
Fax (239) 643-6968 or (239) 213-2913
. :y
Phone (239) 403-2400
WW'W.colliergov.net
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 49
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,
Page 152 of
,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THS
COLLIER COUNTY UlND DSV&LOPllSIIT COOS IIHICH
INCLUDES THS COHPRI:HENSIVS ZONING R&GULATIONS FOR
Till: UNINCORPORATI:D ARIlA or COLLIER COUNTY. n.ORIDA
BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLl\S HlIP NlJIolBtR
9634N: BY CIlANGING Tilt ZONING CLI\SSIrICATIOIl OF.,.
THE HEREIN DESCRIBtD RIlAL PROPERTY FROM ~A. TO ~~
'PUD" PLANNED UNIT DtVELOPH!:NT KNONN lIS 'I'HE "., .
HlIGNOLIA POND PLANNED UNI'I' Dl:vtLOPHENT FOR A i!:~
IlT\XIIlUIl OF 294 IlULTI-FAMILY DII&I.LING UNI'I'S, Y.l1'
LOCATED ON THE NOR'I'H SID!: OF INTERSTAT!: 15, It r+lt!:
W!:ST OF C.R. 951 IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOU!H.
IU\NGE 26 EAS'I', COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDlI, 9~'
CONSISTING OF 42.05 lICR!:S, MORS OR LESS, AND B~~
P!\OVIDING AN !:FFECTIVS Dl\TIt. ..""
...
CD
!; TJ
'"
... .'
::0:
Sl "
'"
&."
.
WHEREAS, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoovar Plannin; Shoppe,
repreaenting Garrett r. x. Beyrent, petitioned the Board of
County Ccmmisaioners to change the .onin; classification of the
herein describad real property,
NOW. TH!:REFORE BE IT ORDAINtD by the Board of County
commisaioners of Collier County, Florida I
S&CTION ON!:.
Tha .onin; classification of tha herein described real
property located in Section 34. Township 49 South, Ran;a 26 East.
Colliar County. Florida, is ohan;ad from ..... to 'PUD' Planned
Unit Development in accordance with the Ma;nolia Pond PUD
Document, attached hereto aa Exhibit ..... and incorporated by
reference harein. The Official Zonin; Atlae Map Number 9634N, as
described in Ordinance Number 91-102. tha Collier County Land
Development Code. is hereby amended accordin;ly.
SECTION TWO.
This Ordinance ahall become effective upon filing with the
Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY AllOPT!:D by the Board of County Ccmmissioner8
of Collier County, Florida, thi~ ...2.:!- day of ~,..... .
, 1998..
~ '
"',.,.tl.:........."..
" . 1 .' .,
I ,..I. "l." "
.......:...;,. ....' ....,<..........
. /~I. A1tmi '/~;',~,rs ":
{'"" '. . '''\.f..)
". ._~ ft
, ' '~.
\':. \. . ...t~'" . K. C rlc' ..
,';,.", ~:m""'. ,fa,l'll'"
'n( ,'" ,t:r&3.,~
\~~ ~ V.. .,. fti.....,,:T Fom....~,
'. 'I..fond' ,Lant.;.. fficiency
~..;,.~' 'rh t:,..;~.,t.
~JI~ .
Harj ie M. Stu ent
Aaaiatant County Attorney
f/tDD""'...1t ON)ntNlCIl
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:_~ ~
aA 9.'1 BE Y, C a1
'Thts ordlnr:ma flied whh *,e
~:::'''h-
and .~ 111..
:'" ~~'!"Jd this day
~; 'L
-
-1-
./
",
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,
Page'153 of
. .
.
MAGNOUA POND PUD
A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PREPARED FOR:
GARRETT P. X. BEYRENT
3115 Collllly Road 151
NAPLES. FLORIDA 34118
PREPARED BY:
WILLIAM L. HOOVER,AtCP
HOOVER PLANNING
3785 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH, SUITE B
NAPLES. FLORIDA 341011
BEAU KEENE, P.E.
KEENE ENGINEERING
3785 AIRPORT ROAD NORm, SUITE D
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105
.
ANTHONY P. PIRES, JR.
WOODWARD. PIRES, LOMBARDO. PA
801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE, IUITI840
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108
DATE FILED
DATI! REVIlED
DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC
DATE APPROVED BY BeC
ORDINANCE NUMBER
November 3.1117
Juna11.1_
IIav 21.1_
June 1.1"8
t!IlD_Aft
..
Agenda Item No. 17A
'.
, t',
,
TABLE OF CONTENT8
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF EXHIBITS
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SECTION 1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
ft
1
2
..
7
13
14
,
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 11\ RESIDENTIAL AASAS PLAN
SECTION roJ PRESERVE AASAS PlAN
SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
.
"
Agenda Item No. 17A
.;.
j. ,
: '.~..
.
",
,
'.
" .
'.',.
.
..
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT"A" PUD MASTER PLAN
EXHlBrr'So PUD WATER MANAGEMENT PlAN
EXHlBrr 'C' DEPICTION OF ARCHITECTURALLY DESIGNED POLE LIGHTING
EXHIBrr '0' DEPICTION OF ARCHITEOTURALLY DESIGNED POLE UGHTING
EXHIBIT 'E" DEPICTION OF PROJECT ENTRY SIGN
EXHIBrr 'f" DEPlCTION OF PROJECT ENTRY SIGN
EXHIBIT '0' LEGAl. DESCRIPTlON
.
III
.'
'.
....
'" ,
..'
.
.
..
Page 156 of 1
,
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development of .pproxlmately 42.05:1: .em of property In Coiner County, . a
PIllnnecl Unit Development 10 be known .. M.gnolla Pond PUD win be In compliance
with the plllMlng 11011II .nd object1ve8 of Collier County as set forlh In !hi CoBler
Counly GrowIh MlllIgament Plan. The re.ldenUaI fecIIlIIe. of Ihe Mignon. Pond PUD
wIR be conalatent with th. growth pollclas, land development regulations. and
appncabte compnlhenslvll planntng object1ve8 for Ihe following re_
1. The lub)ec:l property'a Iocallon In relaUan 10 exlcUng ar propoaad community
faclllll.. and ..rvIoea p.rmlla the developmanl'e re.ldenUal c1enally as cleacIfbed
In Objective 2 of !hi FUlUle Land U.. Element.
.
2. The pro)ec:l development Ia compaUbla .nd compllmenllry 10 IUlnlllndlng land
UII'. requInld In Polley 5.4 of the Futunll.Bnd Us, Element.
3. Improvemenll '''' plannecllo be In compliance with .ppllcllble IIClIons of the
CollIer Counly I.Bnd Development Code u set foIIh In Objective 3 of the Future
I.Bnd UII Elamenl
4. The project c1evelopment win re.ultln In eIlicI.nt Ind economical aiIocallon of
community faclOO.. and ..rvtcu as raqulllld In Pollclas 3.1.H Ind 3.1.L of the
Futu", t.and UIR Element. '
s. The project development II planned to prolecllhe IUnctloning of natural dre/nag.
fealullll and natural groundwater 'qulfar ",chilli' areas as cIeecrlbed In
ObJective 1.5 of th. Drallllga Sub-Elament of !hi PubRc Faclllllae ElamanL
8. The proJect II loceIed wIlhIn !hIlhben Relldenllal Mbcad Uae DI.trlc:! and the
Rellclenllll Density Band IlIOUnd the C.R. 861 - Inlerllale 75 AclIvlly Center, on
the Fulunt t.and UII Mlp. Tha danllty of 5.49 dwIlmng unlta par acre II In
compliance with the FutunI lind UIe Element of the GrowIh Management PIlln
bated on the fDIlllw1ng relallonlhlpa 10 required crll8de:
&Me Den.1ty 4 dwalDng unllII_
AclIYIly Center Density Bend +3 dwIlIItna unllllacra
MIIldmum Perml\led Denalty 7 dwIllng unllllacra
7. All ~llIlloca1 development ollie,. for lhla projacl are IUb)eclIo DIvIsion 3.15,
Mequeta Public Fa..., of the Collier Counly I.Bnd Development Coda.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,
Page .157 of
. '0'
".
"
.
8ECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The PUlJlOIll 0111111 SlCIIon 1110 ntlorlh the Iocallon and owneI'Ih/p 01 the
PfOPeI\y, IIIId 10 cIeIcrlbe the u1IHIllI condlUOIII 01 the property propOleclIo be
developed under the pro)eol- oI....gnoll. Pond PUD.
1.2 LEQAl DESCRIPTION
The aubject pnlJIerl)' bellll/ 42.05:1: -. and IocalacIIn Secllon 34, TOWNIhlp
41180utll, RaIll/I2e e.... and al cIeIcribecI on ExhIb1t "G":
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The IUbjecl pnlJIerl)' II ownacI or under oonIIaCllo purchna by:
Ganell F. X. BeyNnt, 3115 County Road 851, Naplet, Florida 34118.
104 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERtY AREA
.
A. The aub/eCt pnlJIerl)' fa Iocatacl on the north aide oIlnlllrllllle 75. one-half
mila WIlli of C.R. 851 (unJncorpOl8led CoIUer County), Florlda.
8. The anth pro)eoIllle cunentIy h.. Agrlcullural Zonllll/ and II propoaed
10 be rezoned 10 PUD.
1.5 PHYSICAl DESCRIPTION
The pIOjecl.1Ie IIIocalac1 WIIhIn the Main Golden Ga" Can.1 Dndnage Baaln
ICCOIdIng \a the CollIer Countr OIaInaga AllaI. The propoaed outran for the
pIOjeclll the GoIcIan Gala Cana~ loc:aJad north 01 the proJect. The paalc
dllChllva raJa fnIm the daslQn aIorm WID be IImllId 10 0.15 cubic feat per
.-ndIIcre per CoIlIerCovnlyOnlIn.nca No. .,0.
NaIunIl ground allVllllon lI.pploA... 10.8 NGVD The anth alia II IocalacI
Wllhln FEMA Flood ZOne OX" WIIh no be...noocI oIevallon .peclfted.
The waJar management .yaJam lor ilia project JIltIPOMIthe oonalrvcllon of a
perlmaJar be"" WIIh _I alevdon ntal or aIKMI ""' 25-fear, 3-day peak lIood
stage, WaJarqualltr pmw.lmInlll prop~..d In the oHlla lake &}'118m plor 10
dlacha'llalo the ....In Golden Gala Canal.
2
..
.;
,.
,.
I:
Agenda Item No. 17A
Page 158 of'
":
'.:, .
l' 't
,.
'.
Per Comer Countr 80n Legend. datacl January 1880, there ere two predomlnala
typal 011011 found WIIhIn the IImIIe of lIle property:
.,4 . Pineda Fine Sand, UmnIona Subatralum
121 . Boca FJna S10nd
The ella w;eJallon conaIIJa prlmarlly 01 plne.pa1mel\O t1atwoodL Cabbllga palm
h.mmocb and cypnln treoaallo'lM! on..lla,
1.8 PROJECT DesCRIPTION
The Magnolia Pond PUn II a project compo.ad oIa maximum 01231 reaklen\laI
unlla, ",... mldentlal unlll are pro)eclecllo be developed u: vine.. coach
homU, carrlage hOlllll, or oondomInluma. ~onal faclllllea WIll be
plO\llded In oonJunclIon WI1h the dwIIU111lI unllL Realden6a1 land -.
_donal _, and IlQnaga aredulgned 10 be harmonious WIIh one another
In a natural eellll1lll1y UlIIll/ common archftlIcluN. quall\y ._lngIbufletIng,
and nalM "'IIetalIon. WIlenewr feullll..
1.7 SHORTTITLE
Thla Ordlnanoe ahaU be known and clJacI .. the "Mallnolla Pond Planned Unit
Development Ordlnanoe.,
.
,
- _.-._-_...*'_._._._.~
.'
"
.-~--
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2
Page 159 of
.
,
'.
SECTION U
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUlREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpoae 0I1II1a SeclJon 1110 dellnnla and generally cIeIcrIbe the project
plan of developmanl, reJalIonahlpa 10 applicable Countr onIInanou, the
rnpeclIve land u_ 01 the tracts Included In the project, al weft al oilier project
relallon.hlpa.
2.2 GENERAl
,
A. RegulaHona for d_lopmanl Df the Magnolla Pond PUD ahan be In
lICCOIdanCll With Iha conlanll 01 IhII dOCUllllnt, PUD . Planned Unit
Dewlopmant DIlIrIcI and other applicable HCtIona and paIII 01 the
CoIller County Land Development Coda and GnlwIh Manegamenl Plan In
eIIacl at the time oIilauanca 01 any development order 10 which Aid
I1fIIu\alfOnI relaJa which aulhcrlm the oonalrucllon 01 1mprovernenIa.
luch II ~ nor UmIJad 1D Final 8ubclMIIon PIa~ FInal Bile Dewlopment
Plan, EsI:avalIon PennIt IIIId Prellmlnlll)' WOIk Aulhotll..lu..n. Where
..... reguJa60nl fall to provide developmanllll lIancIanl.. ""'" the
provlalona 01 the most lIm1.r dIablct In the Land Dewlopmant Coda aha.
apply.
B. UnlaA oIherWIA noJad, \he deftnlUon. oIal Ie"", wI be the AIIII ..
the detlnltlona HI forth In ""' CollIer County und Dewlopment Code In
eIlect at Ill. time 01 buI1dlng permilappUcalIon.
C. All oondlllonl /mpoHd and Grephlo maJarlaI preIIfttacI dep/cllng
IIIlJ1cl1ona for the development 01 the Magnolia Pond PUD _hall "-
part oIlhe regula'ona which fllMlII the manner In which the PUD ....
may be developed.
All appIlcable regulallonl, un,", apeclftcally waJvlIlIlhrough a variance
or upa..... provIIIon provided lor In 11I11 PUD Document, ahall remain In
fIllIlorClI andllllect.
Dewlopmant permIlled by Ihe approyal 0I1II1a pelIIIon Win be aubject 1D a
COIlCUtnlncy review under the provlIlona of DMIfon 3.15 AdequaJa PubHc
Facllltlea Df the CoIUar County Land DewIopment Coda at the ..rIIeI~ or
next. 10 occur oIellher FInal Bile Dewlopmant Plan appllMlI. FInal Plat
approval, or building pennIt luuanca applloallle 1D IhII developmanl. .
4
; D.
.'
..:
E,
"
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,
Page. 160 of
.'
. ,
..~ .
.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OENSITY OR INTENSITY OF lANO USES
^ mulmum 01 231 dwIIU111lI unIll1 ahall be oonalNcted In Iha mlden\lallll'lu of
the pro)ecl. The gl'Oll project area II 42.05:1: a_. The 9roll pro)ect denallV
lhaft be a maximum of 5,4& unlll per acre.
2.4 RB..ATED PROJECT PlAN APPRrNAl.. REQUIRI!MENTS
A. Th. 9-ra1 configUllIlon 01 the IancI UIlI' are HIuIIraJad graphically on
Exhlbft "A", PUD Millar Plan, whfch conalltuJaa the requlntd PUO
Dewlopment Plan. Atrf dIvlIlon of the proper!)' and the detIeIapmant 01
the I.nd Iha. be In oompnanca WIIh Ille PUO Master PIlIn, DMafon 3.2
Subdlvlllonl of the I.8nd Dewlopment Code, and the platting IlIWI of the
Slate of Florida,
8. The provlllonl of Dlvlllon 3.3. SIIe Development Plena 01 III. Land
Dewlopmant Cod', when appllollble, ahaU apply 10 the detIeIopmant oIa.
pletled tracta, or palllllll oIl,nd .. provided In Hid Dlvlllon 3.3 prlor 10
the IlauallCll oIa bu1ldln& petmll or other development onler,
C. Approprlala Jnaltumanlll Win be provided at the lme of Inlrutruclural
Improvemenfl reganlJng any dedlcallona to CoUJar county and the
melhocfology for providing perpetual malnJananca 01 common facllllllL
2.5 MODEL UNITS AND SALES FACILITIES
A. In conJunclIon WI1h the promo60n 01111. development. mld.nllal units
may be d"l&nated II modell. SUch model unIlI .hell be governed by
.
..
Agenda Item No. 17A
". .
. ";
.'
, .
whereby oklle removal lhan be nmlJad \0 10% of the lOIal volume
e~ but no!lo.-ad 20,000 cubic yanll.
B. All other proYlalona 01 DIvl.1on 3.5 Elavatlon 01 the Land DeIleloplllltul
Code shan apply.
6
. :'
,..
.. .
, .
..
"
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23,
Pag~(162 0
./"..
.
SECTJOtI II
RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN
3.1 PURPOSI!
The PUlJlOIll 0I1hl1 8ecIIon II to ldanllfy .pecllIc develcpmenlllandanll for the
Realclenllaf Ami .. lhown on ExhIbU "A", PUD M....r Plan.
3.2 MAXIMUM DWElLING UNITS
The muImum number 01 mldanHaI clweUllll/ unIlI WIIhIn the PUD IhllI ~.J.f.Tl
until. t ~
3.3 PERMInED USES
No building, Ilrvclure or pert 1hereoI, ahall be ereoIacI. aiJared or UNd. or land
uead. In MIoIa or pert, for other lIIen lIle folloWIng:
Aa Permitted PrlnclDal Uset .nd StrucIuru:
1. Slngle.famlly cIwIlIllngl (IncludaI zero-lot Una).
2. l'wo-famlly dwllUlng. and duple....
3. MuItl.famlly dwIIIIlngl (lncludll townhou.... 8arden aperlmanll,
vIIlal, colch hol1llll, and cameOI homal).
a. Permftted Acoeaorv Uul and Structurea:
.~.
1. CuItomary a_If _ and 1\nJe1Unl. Including catpClIIa,
gallll'" and UIIll\y buUdlngl,
,
2. Reoreall_1 _ and racllltlaa Inc1uc11I1lI eWImm1l1l1 pooIa, tennll
oourII. YoIlaybelI oourII. ohIIdlen'" playground a,...,\ot Iota. boat
dodca. walking palh.. plcnlc are... _aIIon bulldlngl,
verandah&, and bel1allbllllahullle boInI oourlI.
3. Manage"'l mld.nOll end om_. Iampo..ry 11111 trell.... and
model unlla.
4. QalllhoUII.
1
-,_.~.......'..._.
'.
.~ 7'1' :~...
~., 1 :~~:.;:
..' ,
Agenda Item No. 17A
Februa,ry 23, 2
Page~63 of
.....' .
., ~ , .
,.
:.
5, EuenlIal 18N1ce1. Includllll/ Interim .nd pennanent UlII1\y and
malnten.nca faclllUeL
8. Nrt oilier aCCllllOlY UI8 deIlmad oompaUbIe by th. Developmant
Senrlcet 01"*.
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Table I .... forIh Ill. development llandard. for land _ WIIhIn the
Magnolia Pond. Front yanl ntbacb In Tlble I than be manured II
fDlIoM:
1. I~ the p.roel Is ..rved by a pub/lc or prlvlla r1ght-ol-r. ...
..Iback II maaaured fnIm the adjaolnt rlghl-<lJ.My nne.
2. If... paroelll nrved by a non-pIatIed prlvIIa dIM. ... IIlblIclc II
meaaured from the baclc of CUlb or edge of pavement. If the paroel
II nrved by . plalJacl prlvIIa dJlve. the ae1bIck II ~ from
... road auement or properl)' Ilne.
(a) Carporta 1ft 1'......'lIacI Wllhln parklnllareaa.
(b) G.rag...re pannllleclll ""' edge 01 Y8hIcular pavement.
B. Off-Street P.rtdna .nd laIIdlna Reoulrementl:
,. required by Dlvlllon 2.3 oflhe Land Development Cod,1n elIecl at the
time 01 building panni! eppUcallon,
.
.
.
,
.~ -,
...
'.
"
~..._-
/
. ".::':~ .
" .,....-.
. .J ,I.
.;~ ::.~:~:: . .::(,~:.~:
'~ .'
"
. ~. : ;"': :'
"
i\
~ . ....
" ~','
" ,
"
'!'....
.: ..
.'
, .
...
TABLE I
RESlOENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANOAROS 8lNGLE.FAMIL Y 1Wo.FAMlLY MULTIoFAMILY
MInimum Lot Anla 7.soo Sq, Fl 5,000 Sq, Fl 4,000 Sq. Fl
(per unit)
MInimum Lot W1c1lh llO'lnterlor Lola (1) 90' InJarlor Lola (1) NA
(45')(2)
70' Comer Lola 110' Comer Lola NA
(55')(2)
FlDnl Yard SIlbaok ,25' 20' NA
SIcle y.rd SeIbIIck 0' & 10' or bolh 5' 0' & 10' or both 5' NA
Raw YanlSalback:
PrlncIpaI 8lruclunl 20' 20' NA
AI: C III Of)' SlrUoIure 10' 10' NA
PUn IIOundlry Jlel.
bade:
Pr1nc1pa18lrucIure NA NA 20'(3)
MCnlOl)' SItuctunl NA NA 10'
!.Me Salback 20' 20' 20'
NaIunII Habllal Pre-
lIM Are. Setback 25' 2S' 25'
Dlalanca Be.....n NA NA On&-half the IUllI
PrInclpaJ SlrVotulll of the heights.
DllJanOl Between 10' 10' 10'
AcclllOry Slrvoture
MaxImum HeIght
PrInolpal Bulldll1ll 3S' and 211orle1 3S' IIIId 2 atolieI 38' and a IlDlIeI
Acoeaaory Building 2O'lClubhOUll 3S' ..2O'ICIubhoule 35' 2O'1CIIIII"- as'
Minimum Floor Area 1200 Sq. FL 1100 Sq. Fl 1 bedroom - CI50
Sq.FLf2I1edroom-
800 Sq.FlI3 Bed-
_-l050Sq.Fl
MInimum CIIlpOI1 or 2 oar gal1lg& 1 * garegl 1 CIIlpOI1Ipe01 or 1
. gal1lg& per unit car garage
(1) May be reduced on cui de e. lola,
(2) MlnlnIIIn Ial fronlaga In ..-.,....... IppIlee In _ ..... . dweIlII1lI unit In a 2-
ramur Iltuatura la on an lndIvIduaU, p\atlacl1al.
(3) 1'hteHIory buUdll1llllhal be nt back a mlnlmum of """ hundted feet fnIm ..
Golden GeJa Canal rIght-ofoMy and one hUlllked featflom IIdII'I1lld6 76 ~U 111I).
.
"
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,
Pag,e.,165o
. .
.
c. 0Mn 8D1H:e1Naturat Habitat p,..",. Are. Reaulremltntl:
1, A minimum 01 abcly (80) peroant Cpln apeoe, u dllCrlbed In
SeclIon 2.8.31 0I1he Land Development Code, lhan be plO\IIded
0........
2. A minimum 01 \WIInty.lIw (25) pen:ent 01 \he viable naturally
funcllonIl1lI nallwI vegelItIon on-alle (natural Ilabbl p_
.-), IncludInQ both the uncItl'llOry and the ground __
_... IlfWoQ the Iargnt oonlIguouI anti poaalble. IhaM be
rwtaIned llfloIlJa, u dMdled In SeclIan 3.ll.5.5.3 of lhe Land
Del.llolllllent Code.
.
D. LandacllDlna IrId Butferlna RAftlJtndnera:
1. A berm. wan, renca, or oomblnallon 1hereoI, ahaI be pflIlJIdad by
the d_1oper adjaoInl \a Iha aouIhem PUn boundIry .Iong the
InJaralllle 75 r1g~. llalIPlll\flere WIllIand preeeMl _
are prop~lld aclJaOlnl 10 Inltllllle 75. SUch bulfer. .haII be
ptDVldacl prlor 10 ""' IIauanca 01 CatfIII r . I 01 OccupIIncy lor all)'
peIlIIII1Illl reaIdenIaIlfrUalIIree In that ~ Such ect..nlnll
IhaIl haw . heigh! 01 bet.wen lhm and ___If (3.5) and _
(7) feet.bcMt Iha e1ewIIon of thellllllllll MIIbound travel lane 01
InlllrIJaJa 75. Such butrer may haw -'onal opetdr.ga lO
provide gJImpeea 01 the project fnIm InlerI.... 75. In otder 10
mulmlz811CU1fly and mInImb'e ImpactI on uIIIIiltI _, wall1 or
l'enoes lhan not elCOled more lhan elghl (8) reet In height 01 any
IlenMoan or berm/l'enca oomblnaHon.
2. If land~ bUtrera are deletmlned 10 be -rr aclJaoenllO
WIlIltmd preeerw I,..., they .han be eeperaJa fnIm Ihoee
~a_.
.
3. Where two aeperaJa Iwo-IamIIy or IIIlIII/oI'amII projIGte WIIbIn lhe
PUD abuI.ach oIhar, butrerIno and -*'0 ,*-n Iham ahaI
IlOtbe neml.ry, due til the unltIed archllecltunIIlhamethnlughout
lhe enlIre PUn, .. ..dd WIIhln SaclIon 3A!. oIlhIa PUD
Doaumenl. Where a lllaglHady or MD-IImIIy pIOjecl WIIhln lhe
PUD ellula a muIlI.famIIy projecl Wllhln \hi PUn, a Ian (10) foot
bu1rlIr ahan be provided betwoan Ihem, WIIh _ plO\IIded II
\WIInty.lW8 (25) feat on oenter and a IlngIe hedge allo prcMded
wlIhIn euoh bulrer. Such.... and.hruba ahaU meet the IIIndal'll.
for plantil1lll, II clelCrlbecl WIthIn SecIIon UA Planl MnrIeI
II
'.
..---
.'
, .
'"
Agenda Item No, 17
February 23, 201
Page l.SS of 19
"
,.
.
Blandarda end Inllallallon SIanclard" of the l.8nd Development
CoeIe.
E. Archlteclullll 8flIndarda
1. All building&, Ughtil1ll, .Ignage, and lendlcaplng ahan be
arohllllelunllly IIIId 1MlIlelIc:al1y unIIled, Said unItlecI In:hItacIunJ
th8lllll IhaU Include: I almller archlJactunll d_1gn and UII 01
IlmUar malarlall end colorllhroughout al of the buildings, algna.
Ind flllIOIIIwalll to be erectad on aU 01 lI1e IUbject pan:e/L
Landlcapfng and llreelloaplt malarlala aha. 1110 be almller In
dlllJgn throughout the aubJeclllJa. All bulldll1llll ahaII be primarily
ftllllhad In light aubdued colorI WIIh etuooo e_pt for lIecol8tIv8
1rIm. WIthin any mufll.f8rn1l)' project aU rooIa, _pt for CIIJlOllI,
Ihaft be peaked and tInlihed In llle or metaL Wllhln any lingle-
family or two-famlly pro)eol aU rooIa, ellQlpl for carporla, aha. be
peaked and ftnlahed In 1111, mala~ or archllaclulllllyo4ealgned
Ihlnglea (Iuch III TImberline).
2. All pole UghIJng, Intamal to the proJect. wn be .rohIIacIurally
dllllgned, nmlJad 10 a halght 01 thlrtr (30) ....~ and aImIlar
archlJac:\urally 10 _ of the IIghHl1lIllxturee ahown on Exhlblta. "c-
or"D".
.
F. mmm
Sign. IhBl1 be pannlltacl .. delcrlbed W111l1n Dlvlalon 2,5 01 the Collier
Countr Land DlMIlopmanl Code, _pt II dIIcr1bed In the lolIoWIng
Inllancaa.
1. Up to two (2) ground or wan ligna ahaO be pannlltacl at the main
entranoe to the PlIO and Iocalad wllhln the Inlarlor 01 ""' PlIO.
Such ""n(.) ahaII contain only ""' nama 01 the en6n1 42.O$t amI
PlIO proJlcl, _ '01 Indlvlclullf oommunJtIaa Wllhln the PUD
proJect. andlnalgnla or moIIoI 01 ""' clewlopment. Such ,round or
waU aIgn(l) aha. be almller arohIIacIullllly 10 one of the 1Ign.
ahown In ExhIb1ta "E" or "F" and archllaclurally oompallble WIIh the
unllled IrchIlecluraI ,,",ma 01 ""' anlirll PlIO (Ill deaorlbad In
SectIon UE. 0111111 PlIO Document), Slid ground or WIlli "un(l)
IheR not e-.d . oomblned .,.. 01 Ibdy-four (84) lIqUllre feel.
and lhall not e-.d the height or Ielll/lh of tile wan upon which It
II 1ocalacI.
II
.. :."
. !",
" ,
. "
'.. .
.' . ~.
, i
..
"
2. A ground .l;n .haU be permlllld along .. aoulham PUD
boundary. Such aIgn Ih.1 contIfn onIJ the ... of .. entire
ol2.05McrI PUD proJect and ..... be IIlHJacIluraIIJ OIh.ipelIbIe
WIIh the unltled ardlIlec\ural __ 01 \ha PUD eM detCllbed In
8eclJon SAE. 0111111 PUD Documant). EIIcluaIve '" Iandaoeplng.
luch ground aIgn ahal no! .-ad am are. 01 twenlr-four (24)
equarar.et.
.
12
.'
"
'; .
,
.'
.-
.'
".
..
.'
:
'.
. ",
. .'"
SECTION IV
PRESERVE AREAS PLAN
4.1 PURPOSE
The PUlJlOIll 0I1hI1 SecllOllIa 10 k1enllfy apecItIc dewlopmenl aJandanls for the
preaarve Are.. al lhewn on ExhIb1t "A", PUD MalJar Plan.
4.2 PERMITTED USES
No bulldll1ll, IIruclute or part thereof, aha. be ereclacl. alJared or uaed, or land
uaed, In Mlole or part, tor olher than !he foRowIng:
A.. perm1ft8d Prln~t u... and BtrucIu....:
1. Pualve recreetloneJ _including recreeJIonal .hallers,
2. Blldng, hiking, and nature tralll, and bo1Inlwallca.
3, Golf cart pa\I1wayIand boanlwalka,
4. WaJar management feclllllea and _nlIal MMOII.
5, NaIMt preaama and WllclIIfe eanctuerlal.
8. Supplemental tandaoape planllna. _n1ng and buIrwtlnO Wllhln
the NIIlunlI HablJat Preaarve Areal, aIIar the approprtaJa
anvIronmenJal review.
7. My other UII comparable In nature and deemed oompaHbIa by
!he Development SeMon D1reclor,
u
"
'.
Agenda Item No, 17A
.... ~':"':;"::~~.'
. .' .
}: ",'- "
,""
.....,..
. .~ .
": ",'
, "
'.'
.... .
, "
" .
\'. -:'" ..
"
. '. .:
:'
,..
, ,.
....
"
SECTION V
DEVELOPMENT COMMl11lENT8
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpoII oIlhIl SectIon II \0 HI forfh the .o.,.,llll...nta for the dewlopmenl
0111111 proJect.
5.2 QENERAl
All facllllla aIlaU be conIIrucJacI In IIIrIct aoconlanoa WIIh FInal SIIe
OrMIopmanl Plana, FInal Subcllvlllon Plana and d ~1IcabIe SId and local
iIwI, oodee, IIIId regulallona applicable 10 lhI. PUD. In dac:t al the lima 01 FInal
P~ FInal SIIa OrMIcpMIIlt Plan approval or bulIdlng pannll appIIoatIon u lha
_ may be. e-pl MIeM .peclllcally noIId or IIlalad olherwlle, thelllandanla
and apeoIlIoaIlona 01 the ollldaJ Count)' LMd DeullIopmenl Code aha. apply \0
11I11 pro)eoIewnlf the land WIthin lha PUD " nollO be pIIlll1Cl. The clmIlcper.
hII e_ and Ullgnl, .han be mponalble for the oorrmllmanta 0UllIned In
"'I. document.
The dlVlloper; hIa _lOr or _Ignee, lhaU follow lha PUD MuJar Plan and
the reguiallona 0I1hIa PUD u adopted and any olher oondlUona or moclIftoalIona
II may be agreed 10 In the lIZllllIng 01 the properl)'. In eddIUon, any IUCOlIIIOl'
In 118. or _1Qnee IallUbjeol1o "'e ....,..Jbnenla wIIhln thlc Agreement.
5.3 PUD MASTER PU.N
A. ExhIbit ."'., PUn MuJar Plan JlIuatratae the tppOIId clmIlopment and II
conceplualln natuIa. I'nlpplIlI _. lot or land .. boundallae or
epeclalland 1M boundallae ahall not be 00IlIfnIed 10 be llnaI and may lie
varied at any eublequenl appr'aveI plIaM auc:h .. Final PIatlIng or Gila
Deu8lopment Plan approval. SutIjact 10 the provlaloll. 01 SectIon 2.7.3.15
01 the CollIer Countr LMd Dewlopmanl Code, amandmanta may be
made fnIm lima 10 lime,
.
B. All _ry eaHlllll1la, dedlcallone, or other lnatrvmanla ahaII be
orenJad 10 lnaure the conllnued operation and malntenanOl !If an HrvIca
ulIIIlIlla and aU common are.. In the proJect.
14
.;. .
';....'
r.
::~
,
,
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,
Page 1700
"
',:. ..':. '.. ..
'.. ....,..:
.' ~:~. ,,~':,~:,"",'
'.
"
......
'. "
"
, .
. .
.
"~..' ,i
,;'l" .
..
, ..
5.4 SCHEO~ OF D~OPMENTIMONrTORINa REPORT
A 8lJa Development Plan than be lubmIIIacl per Cou"" regulallonlln elfecl at
6me of llIe plan .ubmItIaL The proJeclll pro)eoled III be complaJad In one (1) or
two (2) ph_.
A The Iandownel'l ahall p~ and be governed _n111ll/ \a the time
Omits plllllUlntlo SICIIon 2.7.3.4 oIthe Lend Development Code.
8. MonIIorIna RellGrt: An annuel monllorlng report lhan be aubmItJacI
purluent 10 Section 2.7.3.8 of lIla Collier Cou"" Lend Development
Coda. '
,
5.5 ENGINEERING
A Thfa projocl ah8lI be requlrecl to IMIl aU Cou"" Onllnancea In eIfecl at
lIIe time final conI1tuctIon documents are aubmltled lor developmant
approval.
B. DeIlgn and oonllrvcllon 01 an lmptovemenll .han be IUbject to
~1Ienca Willi applllprlata provlllona 01 the CollIer Cou"" L8nd
Development Coda. DMllon 3,2. SubdMslona.
C. Prlor 10 SDP apPlllVll' a FOOT "NoIIce oIlntant 10 "'118" RIght 01 WIl'/
pennlt IhaD be .ubm1Ited for work Wllhln ""' s.R.llIil right oIway.
0, The pro)eol ahaU ulIllza Inlamalloop roadl whene_ feaalbleand IheU
ellmlneJa dead<<ld roada whe_ poallble.
5,8 WATER MANAlJEMENT
A A copy of the 80uIh Florlda Walar Management ~ (SFWMD)
SurflIoa Wa. PennIl Appncatlon IhaD be Ant 10 CoIUer Cou""
Developmant SeMcea WIIh Ille SOP aubmlllll. A c:opy oItha appnwal of
lhII SFWMO Surface Wa. PennIl Ihll be aubmIlJad prior 10 Final SlIa
DeveIopmanl Plan AppRMI1.
. 8, A c:opy 0I1he approval 01 the SFWMD Right oIWIl'/ and DIachII'lIe Permit
for oUlfaU Inlo lIla Goldan Gate Canallhlll ba lubmIlted prior to Final
SOP applllVllL
IS
,"
, .
....
'.
. .
..
. ;
.....
','
-----
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2
Page) 71 of
.,
..
C, An ExcavatIon Pennll WII be requJred for the plOpONCI IakaI In
lCOOldanca with Dlvlalan ll.5 01 the CollIer County Land Development
Code and SFWMD Rulea.
D. lau ..lbleb from the perlmeJar ollila PUD may be reduoed 10 IWllnl)'-
live (25) feat where a IIx (8) fool high fenoe or aulJable alillltantlal bIIn1er
IIl1fl1C1ad.
E. In the event Collier Countr . UMIla mafulln obtalldl1ll a lie' d...fnage
..~ and . 15' IMInJananca tnIveIway _nt fnIm the _ 01
the properHea 10ClIIad _I oland lIblllting ....gnoa. Pond. Collier County
aha. require the Magnolia Pond dlMtlcper to .IT lhe w;etallon and
level lhe apoIl IlIIIerIaI from ... axIIlIng 25' _nt IocaJad along
MagnoUa Pond'. 'altern PfOPeI\y ana to provide a malnle_
traveJwey _nL All bulrelllhaU III Iocalad oulIlde ... maln1ananca
traveJway, All cut alumpa lhaII be IteaJad WIIh an approprlale heItlk:lde to
pmenl ~roWIh.
F. p,tItIoner InUII oblaln pennllllon from property own... ablllting the north
.lde 01 a_ roed to plaoe roadway till (11de aIopea) on ,,",Ir propelly.
G. AuIhorIzaIlon fnIm ColIler County and FOOT tnUII be obtained prior 10
oonatnIclIng culverla under the _ roed for CCIIIVIYIIllI 1-75 lUllolf and
runoIIlrom lOuIh of 1-75.
5.7 unmes
A. Wetllr dlllrlbullon, .-vI coIIeclIon and traMmllIIon IINIlnlarlm waJar
Ind/or HWIgtIlnIltmenl feclllllello _ the project I'" to be dealgned,
OOIlIInlCIad, OOllVWfId, ownacI and matnlalned In aocordanca WIIh CollIer
CounIy Ont~ No. 87-17, UlI/llllnded, and oilier appUcable Countr
ruJes and reguJatlOlUl,
5.t TRAFFIC
.
A. The applicant ahan be reapona/lIla for ... InaJaIIa/lon 01 lllar/lll level
IIrMt IIgII\q at an pIOjecl Wltre_ and at lilt InJartecllon of Act>>a
RollI No. 2 and C.R. 851, unMt pmI-'Y provided by _ 01 the oIher
propelly _ aIIo UlIIIzIng lach _ road. InaJane/lon ahall be In
pl_ pIIor lD the -.- 0I1I'Il' IlIl'lItIclItlI 01 oocupancy.
B. AcoeIa Road No. 2 ahaa be bnlullht UlIIo CouiIly aJandItda WIIh nnpect
10 grecllng, paving and drainage. 11111 MIle ehalI be the reeponalbllllr of
I'
'.
.,
..
.,
'.
:i'.,
.'
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Page .1720
.
. .~:.
. ;',
. .;.
.', ,,'
~. .
",
, ' .
, .
'.,. ....
, ..
...... .
,-"..' "
C.
the developer end thell be In place pdor to the IIlulIIlCI 01 any certltlce\et
01 occupancy. All Imp_en" thaD IIlCIancI wnterly \0 the project'.
_lIem property boundary.
Accen Road No. 2 onlo C,R, 951 II eub)ecllo bo1h FOOT and County
aCC8/11 manegement slandetdl, Any exl8l1lll/ median openings In c.R.
851 may be modified at any 6me, W111ch could Include dlraclIonBf _I
or clol\ll8 by elthar FOOT or Collier County. Any exlsllng medlan
opening Ihall not veil any right In the eppllcant aucllthat Conler County or
FOOT may be nable for eny dtmagea due to median modIfIcellonl In the
fulute.
O.
Subltanllal oomp.lantevldence th.n be provld.d by lha developer 10 the
effect that the projeclll d8ll&ned to provide capaclly and ....lmant for
hlllorlcal roadway Nnolf. In addlllon. aile dralnag. .ha. not be pennl\Ied
10 dlecha'lll directly Inlll any roadway dl'8inags &}'Item,
Road Impact Feea thell be paid In accordance wIIh Otdlnence 92-22, al
.mended. and thall be pald at the 6ma building permlla ere lnuad unle..
olherwlle approved by lhe Board 01 County Cornmlnlonara..
In the event that I.) tha Board 01 County Comrnllllonera requlrel the
Inleroonnecllon oIlhe Int.ma1 roadway ~ 01 the Golden Gala Haelth
Park P\JD \0 Ill. exlltlng AcceIa Road No. 2; and, B.) the developer 01 the
Golden Gate Health Center PUn plOllldes a route over aald Internal
roedway 8)'Ilem of the Golden Gete Health Park PUO for the Magno!le
Pond projecllo and from a lralllc tlgnal at the Inl.raecllon of IIld Inlemat
roedway s)'lltem end C.R. 951. .s shown on tha County'. Acce88
Management Plan, than the developer 01 MlllInone Pond shen be required
10 make a fair share oonlrlbulJon 10 oover the o0?I oIlhe dulgn and
oonatrucllon 01 auch roula o'/llr eald Intemel roadway 8)'Ilem. The fair
share calcu1a60n shen ba bued upon the proJtc:led Ir8lllc g.neratlon 01
thII projecllllat wI1I utI1Ize stich roula lMIl' 111d Interne! roadway I)'8lllm of
the Golden Gate Health Perk PUD,
The dllVllloper'e fair ahare than be blJaed upon a _able and pro-raJa
ahara M8gnoIla Pond'l weekday delly traftlo generation tale In relallon to
the toteJ weekday dsny ItaIlIc generation tale ullllzlng lUeIl route _ llleI
Intern.t roadway, which IhaIIlnclude at a minimum the ItaIlIc g_reUon
from Frank Homan" 74-ecrel abulIIng on the aoutII aide 01 Acce81 ROlld
112 end tretllc 110m the Golden G.te HeeIth Perk PUD. All prolecl8'
weekday dally It8lIlc generation retes ahaII be computed bued on their
188paottve maximum plrmlIlecI land u.. .. epproYlICl Wllhln their
17
Eo
F.
,. ~
'.'
"
. .
"
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2
Page.1J3 of
.':',
.....,
t:.
:~
'..
.1'
";".
':.-', . ....
... I'
.-!....:
..... '.
:.. ..",'
"
.'.
.
mpectlvll P\JOa end wIIh trlp dlalttbutlon II .hown on 1helr moat recenIIy
aubmllled end apptOYed TIS by CoIl1er County TrenlpotlallOll ServIce$.
The developer 01 the Magnolia Pond PUO shen pay Ila fair share 01 \he
ooIIe 01 the route CMf Aid Intemal roadwlly lyalern. SaId fair ahara
8IIIOUIlt Ihall be IlmltacIIo a maximum langth 01 2200 feet of Illadway
baaed on the centerline 0I1hII roadway. The o0?I 0111I11 ahared roadway
BhaIIlnclude: 0011I 01 permltllng. englnaerlng, aurveylng. applloatlon f....
and conetrucllon 01 the roadway pevement, 1Idawalka. drelnega facllIIe..
traffto aIgnaI IIIId tum Ian.. .1011ll C.R, 851, land ooalI (with the
oontrIbuIIon by Magnolla Pond devaloper nollD exoeed $25,000.). and
Iandacaplng (WIlh a IIlIlCImum Iandscaplllll budget of $10,000.). PrIor 10
COIIIllruCtIon, the engineer for Golden GaJa Health Park PUD lha. provide
\he dellgnated anglneer for Magnolla Pond PUD wIIh a oomplela o0?I
breakdown showing that design end j'Io,llllllhll ooIIe are Independent of
thoA for the ..malnder 01 Golden GaJa HaaHh Park PUD. The o0?I 01
IhII ahared nHldwlly ahel not Include: Ihe o0?I of uflllty cIeIlQn and
COIlItruClIon, extraordinary d..lgnlpermlttlngf oonattucllon ooIIa, or oIher
COIlIlhet cannot be ahown 10 heve . dlIIcl benent 10 the MagnoIla Pond
PUD, IUch .. Intemal tum Ian.. liNIng only lIle Golden Gille HeaUh
P.rk PUD,
5.9 PlANNING
A. Pursuant to ~ 2.2.25.8.1 01 the Land Development Code, If dur!l1ll
th. COIltIe 01 lite deering, excavrdIon or oIher oonllntcllon adIvIty a
hIIIorIo or a!llhaeologloel artlfaol II found, an development wflhIn the
minimum ..... nece...ry 10 protect the dlaoovety shea be immediately
slopped end the CoHIer County Code Enfol1llment Daperlmenl
oontaoled.
5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL
A. EnvlronmenJal pennlltlng shell be In acoordance wIIh Ille Slate 01 Florida
EnvlronrnenJal Rnou/llll Pannlt RuleI and be aubJed 10 review and
epproval by the Cumlnt PlfMIn& EnvtronmenJal RevIew Sta1f. RatmY81
of elCOllc vegeJallon lhaU nciI be counted towarda mIlI9allon for Impaota 10
CoIUer Cou"" jurI.dlollonal Wll6andl.
B. All oonl'rvatlon meal shea be dealgnaJad II cona.rveUon/pmllMlllon
tracts or ea.emttnll on all oon.trucIIon planl end sheD be reoordecI on the
plat wfth prot.ctIve COVlIll8nll par or limier 10 Section 704.os 0I1ha
FIotlda StatuteL SufferI shall be provided In ecoordllllC8 wIIh SectIon
3.2.8.4.7.3 of Ihe CoIller County Land Dawlopment Code.
II
., .
.,'
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,
pa,ge, 174 of
;;it.::~ ',.. ;.";:"
.... :;~;~ ..
.. "
.....
"
.'
.'. ..
"
.'
"
::.
',' .
... :....
In the event the pro)ec\ dOft not require platting, eU COIlIIlrvatlon erea.
ahan be recorded II co_rvetIon/prelervellon InIcta or _menl8
dedlcatacllo an approved enllly or 10 Collier County WIIh no relJPOlllllblllly
for melnlenenOl end lubject to \he Ulel and IImltatlonlllmllar 10 or II
per Section 704,08 01 \he FlorIda sta\uJaL
C. Sullera aha. be provided around any we1lend1, extendll1ll allHlllllteen
(15) feet lendward from Ille edge 01 wetland pmlrvel In en pi.- and
avngll1ll lwenty.f1v8 (25) feet from Illa IIndward edge of w.lfenda.
Where natural bulrenl are not ponlble, IInlctural bull... ahal bII pn:Mded
In acoordanCG WIIh the Slata 01 Florida Environmental Reaouroaa Penna
Rulal and ba aubJeclIo review end epproval by the ClIlI'llnt Planning
Envlronmenlel Review SJalf.
D, An IlCoIlc vegetation remove~ monaoring, and malnlenanOl (exotJc.he)
plan for the aHa, With emphllll on \he oo_rvetfonfprelelVllUon areal,
Ihall be submitted 10 CUrfent,P1amlng EnvIlllllIllIntal Ravlaw Staft' for
revlllW IIIId approval prior 10 FInal Site DevaIopmant P1anlConllrucllon
P1anepprovaL
!, Thll PUD lhan comply wIlh the envtronmental aICIIona of \he ColIler
County Lend Development Code and Growth Managament Plan
eonelllV8llon end Coulel Management Element at ... lime 01 final
devaJopment order approval.
F, A Gopher Torlol.. relocallon/management plan than be IUbmIIled to
CUrtllllt Planning environmental Staft' for revlllW and epprovaL A copy 01
the approved plan languege than be Included on the Flnel sae
Development P1en.
G. PrIor 10 Final SRe Development Plan approvalllla petIlIoner .hal .ubmll a
copy 01 the FlorIda Gama and Fmh Water FIIh Cornmlaalon Gopher
" TOttoIae PermIt.
,.,'
I'
,'.
, ,
'.
,.
'.
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 175 of 199
'":....~.. ",: .<" \~ .." " \
." ','
;;. ,.~.~ .::~'.~
...
-
...
------'-
------.
--
-
.::;-
.. ==::..
~.s
-:::tf;l
iif:';:::::-::::' : :,',;;,
--~
Di . ;=~
~ ~:.:.:.:.:
........ ::.....:: ~ G
.... -- .:~.:. - -='-
i& :.:.:.:.:
......
.::;-
.. :;:r::"
I,
~~~.'::;":<:f....1~\..oI' ~~.::'.~'':''
" .
;{:'t:;:(;s /'<:;'::: ':{<~'?
\" \....1., :-,..'l.. . t ..', ~.' ~ .
'4i,~l;1j;t'!;':'i~~~.J: ~/.:;
. ".
'::':'~:i':; ;:'.~ :;:-".~i;~~:..~" ..
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 176 of 199
-=..
-----",,,,
......
--_...---
--
'"">-.1 _
--~
-
--
..-...
-
--==-
--
--
-
-...~
~
~
_:o-
n
ii.iiir':-
_'Iii --
-
.=r.&-.r.:..-====r=,rt
!,,:='J:::uunr.c,,
r.;::
in-irA:.-==:-
g....&.-=..
z~..
" ...r----..
-
..:;-
..=:.,
~==r
: .:,,-'
'.,\
, ~,.....
Agenda Item No, 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 177 of 199
"
I
I I
I 1
!
~I
: .' ", ,. "
i>X~'>::\ ~;:; ';:~,
~:~/\'~'~ f.'
" '..
" .
. '" "':'. '. :.,....(<:~.
I
i I
I ~
~!
I
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 178 of 199
':
."
[';:ii;\};. ::::i ;"'<;~['
!~~>:::: >:~:. ::'''\.:''.~.;.:..~
';'. .
. ~"""""';"" ..~.~ ~:~;
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Pa.ge 179 of 99
..
......
'..t
;'
, '
.
.'
..('i;~"!;:.~l
:".~.~.~';~f:~ :
" "
, .'
",:::'.:.'
~' ,I
"
: :.f .~. ... .... .~ ,t-. . ,
: \....:.!Vrl:~...~.r t.;;~':"
,l:\j~f..,.:~,:~;~:?::: '
"
....
, "
"
..'.
'0- ."
BXIIIBlT "B"
.......clIOrforn.omcrmmlY I1GN
.
.'
-
)\ ," ,
--'~ ~,~; ~"
0, J .'
" 'I'L
"
, ,
.1 f ~/
I
..' ,
......#:. .
.~ -c'.
"
,
.
"
.>
.
...
_.
~-
~;l.-'
, ...
'-l'-
"""t~-.
,~~~
'(" . ~ ,','.
~
'.>':,:~~~~i~g~~~$,~::~~{;~...,'1t;,
,~~;.,:..",,(.~;,~1'J,~,ft:\;;~:''''t.JS\Ii;'' N" 'f' ,...,",
': ~l' '~~~r.j;.'~\~~,,~-:j~' ;:~~:'~"~J~f.~0~~~!::'~\ '.'"
, ,.
;'.,
',;.
"
?~.
"
.
..,
\...,......... ".. ',"
~.~ t;..'i'~,..s...... ~/:".!J l ~. . .
~.~f.\;\~.:t:....,:?; ~., :",",!\-: ~.;;, .
,.~:::'~".,: ,"It.,,::"-.:;."""
,"..:r.""&;' .r"'......
.\.;., "!'~"""'~.~il ':'.'
}~~4~;~{:~::i t~:r '
'.~ .'i:\/O"~~(~ ~..' :":. ..,;.
':~~1~itf?:~]:/',
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 180 of
~..~
~.
,~.
.' ~
"1.'
'.~
~J'
...
-'t':
,...
./'
. ~'~'....t.
"".li'
:"t::,. ~
',;, ,':.
""'"
.."1.,"J .
',~ .'
~.\.'~. I
)~~,;..'
~~~.::..
.....,... "
....
r .
~.l.
:.)'~i~
".r..
'.~;
:r.'l... .
", '~."
. ;-
,', .
':...... ',.
. ~ .~ :', ':
: ~: .' .
;.
"
,,'f
, ,
.',
"'.<
,
BXHIBrr "F'
DBPICI1DN OF PI.OlIICI' IlNTI.Y lOON
.
"
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
"'Pag
','
,
,
:-
STA~'~
ORIllA)
COtlR'l'f 01! COLLIIlIlI
X, DlfXCll\'1' B. BROCK. Clerk of Court. ln. ancl for the '1'wen.t1etll
. J\l41cla1 Clrcu1t. ool11er County. Florlda, do bereby cert:1fy that tbe
foreool.Dg 1. a true copy of I
ORDXlWICll NO. 98-0
Wh1cb va. adopte4 by \:be Board of County OOllllllbdcmer. on \:be ,\:b day
of _. un. dudng Regular se.a1Oll.
.:it,'
lII'l.'IlESS IIIl( band ancl tile offlclal .eal of the Board of County
, COlIIad...lonen of Col11er County, 'lorlda, this 15\:b day of .:June. 1998.
"
;""~""'~"""""'t ...
DWIGHT B. BROCK . : "~ \" ",i.tlf,~.:... :.....
. =:' .'... .' .,1..., . .
Clerk o. Court. ,,,,,,erlt ">i ....f'. "
BlC-offlclo to Boa. ,~t.>;{~':;~J."\"""t,\
County COlIIad...ion ....';!.. ,":,l,(!lill~i
. lr.t. r: .' t" " ..1f'''1
14 .."u,.,' ,.,.. , 4,.'.,'. ·
::' I.'..:..~' '''l~'fi.'''' ..:.
~ ... .." :;'~...., ...'" t"
':. ~'.,. I: .. . t' . to ,
I Maureen ~ ~.... -'.! ..'.'# i I
Deputy Clerk .t,...." .':....1: ...... ....
,....~.'1..'t.,~;......:;.;."-'i-.
............,..'..,.....
'~";' I~;
. ";":...\
':e>
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 182 of 199
ORDINANCE NO. 10-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND AGRICULTURAL (A) TO
MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) FOR
A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE MAGNOLIA POND MPUD
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
INTERSTATE 75, Y, MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD
(CR 951), IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF
47,05:1: ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF
ORDINANCE NUMBER 98-49, THE FORMER MAGNOLIA
POND PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, Timothy Hancock, AICP of Davidson Engineering, Inc, and Patrick White,
Esquire of Porter, Wright. Morris & Arthur, representing Magnolia Pond Holdings, LLC, Pawel
and Teryl Brzeski and Teryl H. Brzeski, Trustee of The Land Trust #I-B dated September II,
200 I, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the
herein described real property,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 34,
Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and Agricultural (A) to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)
to be known as the Magnolia Pond MPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached
PUDZ.A-2006-AR-10318
Rev, 01113110
Page I of2
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Page 183 of 199
hereto and incorporated by reference herein, The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as
described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance Number 98-49, known as the Magnolia Pond PUD, adopted on June 9, 1998,
by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby repealed in its
entirety.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _ day of
,2010,
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
, Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Jd.. (. l.JQL
Steven T, Williams
Assistant County Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Permitted Uses
Exhibit "B" - Development Standards and Tables
Exhibit "C" - Master Plan
Exhibit "D" - Legal Description
Exhibit "E" - Deviations
Exhibit "F" - Developer Commitments
09-CPS-00936131
PUDZ-A.2006.AR- I 03 I 8
Rev, 01113/10
Page 2 of2
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Page 184 of 199
EXHIBIT A
The Magnolia Pond PUD is:l: 47,05 acres in size and hasa maximum number of231
dwelling units permitted with a density of 4,9 units per acre.
PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Singll~..family dwellings (includes zero-lot line), limited to a maximum of
125 units,
2. Two-family dwellings and duplexes,
3, Multi-family dwellings (includes buildings containing more than 2 units
that are physically connected).
4. Assisted living facilities at a FAR, of ,60 (for each four ALF units
developed, one residential dwelling unit shall be subtracted from the
maXimum of231 permitted dwelling units),
5, Any other permitted use deemed compatible by the Board of Zoning
Appeals.
B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal
uses and structures, including but not limited to:
I. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and
utility buildings.
2, Recreational uses and facilities including clubhouses, swimming pools,
tennis courts, volleyball courts, children's' playground areas, tot lots, boat
docks, walking paths, horse trails and barns, kayak and canoe launches
and storage, picnic areas, recreation buildings, verandahs. and
basketball/shuffle board courts.
3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers. and model
units.
4. Gatehouse.
Revised 1-12-10 Page lofl5
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 185 of 199
5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and
maintenance facilities.
6. Any other accessory use deemed compatible by the Board of Zoning
Appeals.
Revised 1-]2-]0 Page 2 ofl5
Agenda Item No, 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 186 of 199
EXlllBIT B
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARDS SINGLE. TWO- MULTI- ASSISTED CLUBHOUSE
LIVING
FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY FACILITY
Min. Lot Area
(per unit/use) 7,500 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft, 4,000 sq, ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft.
50 feet 90 feet
Min. Lot interior (1) interior (I) 50 feet
Width (45 feet)(2) interior(l )
60 feet NA 75 feet
110 feet 60 feet corner
corner corner lots
(55 feet)(2)
Front Yard 15 feet (5) 15 feet (5) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Setback
Side Yard o feet & 10 o feet & 10
Setback feet or both feet or both 1 5 feet 15 feet 15 feet
5 feet 5 feet
Rear Yard
Setback
Principal: 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Accessory: 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
MPOO
Boundary Set-
back:
Principal: 20 feet (3) 20 feet (3) 20 feet (3) 20 feet (3) 20 feet (3)
Accessory: 10 feet 10 feet I 0 feet I 0 feet 10 feet
Revised 1-12-10
Page 3 oflS
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 187 of 199
STANDARDS SINGLE- TWO- MUL TI- ASSISTED CLUBHOUSE
LIVING
FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY FACILITY
Setback from 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet
1-75
Garage 23 feet 23 feet 23 feet 23 feet NA
Setback (4)
Preserve Area
Setback
Principal: 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 Feet
Accessorv: 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet JO Feet
Distance One.half the One-half the One-half the
Between NA NA sum of the sum of the sum of the
Principal building building building
Structures hei"hts, heights. heights.
Distance
Between 1 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet 1 0 feet 1 0 feet
Accessory
Structures:
Maximum
Zoned Height
Principal : 35 feet and 2 35 feet and 2 38 feet and 3 38 feet and 3 35 feet and 2
stories stories stories stories stories
Accessory: 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Maximum
Actual Height
Principal: 42 feet and 2 42 feet and 2 45 feet and 3 45 feet and 3 42 feet and 2
stories stories stories stories stories
Accessory: 27 feet 27 feet 27 feet 27 feet 27 feet
Minimum I bdr. 650 sq,
Floor Area 1200 sq. ft. 1100 sq. ft, ft. (6) 1200 sq, ft.
2 bdr. - 900
sq. ft.
3 bdr. - 1050
sa.ft.
Minimum I carport
carport or 2 car garage I car garage space or 1 car (7) NA
garage per unit "ara"e
(1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots,
(2) Minimum lot frontage in parentheses applies only in cases where a dwelling unit in a 2-family
structure is on an individually platted lot.
(3) Three-story buildings shaH be set back a minimum of three hundred feet from the Golden Gate
Canal right-of-way and one hundred feet from Interstate 75 right-of-way.
Revised 1-12-10
Page 4 of15
Agenda Item No, 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 188 of 199
(4) A minimum of23 feet shall be provided from the back ofsidewalklcurb to the face of garage.
(5) IS foot setback shall apply to side-entry garages. Front entry garages must maintain a minimum
of 23 feet.
(6) Maximum floor area for ALF shall be calculated per the permitted FA.R, of ,60.
(7) Not applicable for assisted living facility buildings. Independent living units that are part of an
ALF shall mirror the multi-family parking requirements.
(8) The buffer along Magnolia Pond Drive shall be a Type D buffer of either 10 feet in width with a
6 foot privacy wall or 15 feet in width if only vegetation is installed.
Revised 1-12-10
Page 5 of15
~u
-< 11;.
is -oJ:
II "'!
..:l !I
-~- N' ' l:llli I
.. ,," ,', . ' ,.,. . ... IU~
::!: j\,I!I.I:~:I!ili':I!il: 1;1
.;,:,:,J.,."":,,,: . zdl
:.U~WFn~:i:r,Hr~,";. ' ! -' ,:5
.,'."."'"""."'.'. _>t.~~..
'".." ,......'.... Ii'
':::::n:::'. iCa.
. .... , , , 1:111
,:.:..:,.,.:. III
~ ~.~.n~,f;:~:;:-~ . wi
::::. . a~
EXlUBIT C
MPUD MASTER PLAN
ii UI,
hill!
il :!JI
~h li~1
li:1 i:i~
il: hll
~n 1M
. .
,
'Iljl
~=Iil'
3611
!!SIHII I ~ ~~hUhl i
. nil III ~ Ilnlnl! ~ I
i 1;~h~U ! ill
~ Ijffi ~U
; I II Ii I; ~ mn~m II
,
II
~~._. --
I lW-~-'i)l L:l
1\ ~. II, II[="'~~~~] II ,II ~
, ~
=:'......,...., J 11.
!q
~
.1"
~
"\
~
II ~
5 ·
9 i
,
, I
Revised 1-12-10
Page 6 of 15
b
-~=. .
Agenda Item No. 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 189 of 199
I~e~
i
~
Hi
~ ix
~ .f"
III
l
~
.
I
Agenda Item No. 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 190 of 199
EXIDBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR MAGNOLIA POND MPUD
OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 3749, PAGES 0161-0165
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 soum, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 8:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTIIWEST 114 IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY !.D. #00296760002
AND
PARCEL 20: ,
THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORmWEST 114 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY I,D, #00297240000
AND
PARCEL 21:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE
NORmWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF TIlE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORmWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
TOGETHER WIm ALL THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS NOW OWNED
BY THE GRANTOR AMOUNT TO NOT LESS TIIAN 25%,
LESS A PORTION OF THE SE 114 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING
MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 49 soum, RANGE 26 EAST; RUN THENCE, soum 00020'07" EAST
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF mE NORTIIWEST 114 OF SAID SECTION 34, A.
DISTANCE OF 2,324.86 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORm
74009'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 323.86 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE, NORm
73000'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 364.53 FEET; THENCE soum 00019'13" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 355.71 FEET TO A POINT OF A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE, FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF SOUTH
76001 '14" EAST, RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 11,297.16 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03000'41" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 593,78 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE, soum
73000'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 92.07 FEET; THENCE, NORm 00020'07" WEST
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF
346.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5,231 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Revised 1-12-10
Page 7 of IS
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 191 of 199
SUBJECT TO: A 50 FOOT MUTITAL RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT EXlENDING
25 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ALL SECTION LANDS INCLUDING QUARlER
AND QUARlER QUARTER SECTION LINES, WHICH EASEMENT IS FOR THE
USE AND BENEFIT OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
LESS AND EXCEPT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN QUIT-CLAW DEED
RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2323, PAGE 508, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY 1.0. #00297280002
AND
PARCELS 33 & 38:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORlEWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
TOGETHER WITH ALL THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS NOW OWNED
BY THE GRANTOR, AMOUNTING TO NOT LESS THAN 25%.
SUBJECT TO: A 50 FOOT MUTUAL RIGlIT-OF-WA Y EASEMENT EXlENDING
25 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ALL SECTION LANDS INCLUDING QUARlER
AND QUARlER QUARlER SECTION LINES, WHICH EASEMENT IS FOR THE
USE AND BENEFIT OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
PROPERTY 1.0. #00297720009
AND
PARCEL 39:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
TOGETHER WIlE ALL THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS NOW OWNED
BY THE GRANTOR AMOUNTING TO NOT LESS THAN 25%, LESS AND EXCEPT
THE PARCEL SET FORlE IN THAT CERTAIN STIPULA lED FINAL JUDGMENT
RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 994, PAGES 1760-1763, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
SUBJECT TO: A 50 FOOT MUTUAL RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT EXTENDING
25 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF ALL SECTION LANDS INCLUDING QUARlER
AND QUARlER QUARTER SECTION LINES, WHICH EASEMENT IS FOR lEE
USE AND BENEFIT OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS.
PROPERTY 1.0. #00297880004
AND
PARCEL 41:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORlEWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 sourn, RANGE 26 EAST,
LESS AND EXCEPT THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
1048, PAGES 521-523, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
PROPERTY 1.0. #00298000003
AND
Revised 1-12-]0
Page 8 of! 5
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 192 of 199
PARCEL 114:
THATPARTOFTHES 1/2 OFTHENW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE RUN N J6059'37"
E A DISTANCE OF 162.00 FEET; THENCE N 73000'33" W A DISTANCE OF 893,75
FEET; THENCE N J6059'27" E A DISTANCE OF 162.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; AND lHE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A CHORD BEARING OFN 73037'19" W;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
11,621.16 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 01013'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF
249,10 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCEN 88028'35" EA DISTANCE
OF 336.37 FEET; THENCE S 00019'13" E A DISTANCE OF 109,09 FEET; THENCE
N 73000'33" W A DISTANCE OF 102.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, CONDITIONS AND
EASEMENTS OF RECORD AND UTILITIES REMAINING IN PLACE AND IN USE,
IF ANY, lHIS PROPERTY CANNOT BE USED FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
PURPOSES,
RESERVING UNTO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION ALL RIGHTS OF INGRESS, EGRESS, LIGHT, AIR, AND
VIEW BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE ROAD
NAMED AS FOLLOWS:
STATE ROAD 93 (1-75); ALONG THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCE AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUlH,
RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE RUN N 16059'37" E A DISTANCE OF 162,00 FEET;
THENCE N 73000'33" W A DISTANCE OF 893.75 FEET; THENCE N 16059'27" E A
DISTANCE OF 152.00 FEET; THENCE S 73000'33" EADISTANCEOF 102.33 FEET
TO lHE BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LIMITED ACCESS LINE;
THENCE N 73000'33" W A DISTANCE OF 102.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
CURVE CONCAVE SOUlHWESTERL Y AND HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N
73037'19" W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 11,621.16 FEET. THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 01013'41" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 249.1 0 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE AND THE END OF
SAID DESCRIBED LIMITED ACCESS LINE,
PROPERTY !.D. #00297280002
AND
THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2904, PAGES 0876
THROUGH 0879 INCLUSIVE, MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
Revised 1-12-10
Page 9 of 15
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Page 193 of 199
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4 LYING IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
AND THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 3002, PAGE
2740 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, SAME BEING FNE ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS EASEMENT OF 25 FEET ON, OVER AND ALONG TIlE
NORTH LINE AND A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID
PROPERTY.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD,
SUBJECT PARCEL CONTAINS 2,049,396.00 SQ. FEET, OR 47.05:f: ACRES OF
LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Revised ].]2.10
Page 10 oflS
Agenda Item No, 17 A
February 23,2010
Page 194 of 199
EXHIBIT E
DEVIATIONS
LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING REOUIREMENTS:
A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02(C)2, Buffer Yard
Requirements, which requires an Alternative B (IS foot wide) Landscape Buffer,
to allow for a reduction in width to 10 feet when the common property line
between single or two family units and multi-family units are internal to the
project and employ a similar architectural theme. The planting materials shall be
the same as the Type 'B' buffer.
B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01(0), Minimum Right-of.Way
Widths, which requires a minimwn of a 60 foot width, to pennit within the
proposed MPUD internal roadway right-of-ways of 50 feet in width.
-
Revised 1.12-10
Page 11 of 15
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 195 of 199
EXmBIT F
LISTOFDEVELOPERCO~TMENTS
1. GENERAL
The property owner, his or her assigns and or subsequent homeowners
associations will be responsible for the maintenance of common areas and
infrastructure associated with future development.
2. ENGINEERING
A. Prior to SOP approval a FOOT ''Notice of Intent to Issue" Right of Way
pennit shall be submitted for work within the S.R. 951 right of way.
B. The project shall utilize internal loop roads whenever feasible and shall
eliminate dead-end roads where practical.
3, WATER MANAGEMENT
A. A copy of the approval of the SFWMD Right of Way and Discharge
Pennit for outfall into the Golden Gate Canal shall be submitted prior to
Final Plat and/or SOP approval.
B. A 3D' wide drainage, maintenance and access easement will be donated at
no cost to the County along the entire length of the eastern property line.
Said easement will be provided at the time the applicant receives an
approved SOP or within 120 days of receiving a written request for the
drainage easement from Collier County.
C. Lake setbacks from the perimeter of the MPUD may be reduced to twenty-
five (25) feet where a six (6) foot high fence or suitable substantial barrier
is erected. ..
Revised 1-12-10 Page 12 of 15
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23,2010
Page 196 of 199
4. TRAFFIC
A. This project may not receive Development Order approval until fair share
contribution towards planned intersection improvements at the Magnolia
Pond and CR-951 intersection as identified by County project SAP
#60092 extending from Davis Blvd, northward to the Golden Gate canal
have been approved and accepted by Collier County.
B. A minimum throat length of 100 feet shall be maintained at any gated
entrance.
C. The maximum number of trips generated by any proposed development
shall be based on the 125 single-family units (LUC 210) defined in the
TIS that generate 131 pm peak hour trips. Any mixed residential
development proposed shall not exceed those 131 pm peak hour trips,
D. The donation of the 30' drainage, maintenance and access easement along
the eastern property line represents the project's full fair share portion of
the one-time maintenance/clean out costs of the MGG-15 drainage swale,
E. The property owner shall within 30 days of the adoption of this PUD
convey at no cost to the County a 20' easement along the southern side of
the Golden Gate Canal for use as a pedestrian and bicycle access purposes.
The easement will not be used by vehicles beyond those necessary to
maintain the improvements constructed within the easement
5, ENVIRONMENTAL
A. The minimum native preservation requirement shall be 10.28 acres (41.1 0
acres existing indigenous vegetation x 25% = 10,28 acres to be preserved).
B. Pennitted Principal Uses and Structures in the Preserve (for as long as the
minimum required preserve acreage is retained):
(i) Passive recreational areas including recreational shelters.
(ii) Biking, hiking, and nature and horse trails, and boardwalks,
(iii) Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries,
(iv) Any other use deemed consistent with the LDC for pennitted uses
in preserves or deemed compatible by the BZA at time of
Development Order approval,
C, Florida Black Bear and Big Cypress fox squirrel management plans shall
be submitted as part of the next Development Order.
D, A Gopher Tortoise relocation management plan shall be submitted as part
of the next Development Order.
Revised 1-12-10 Page 13 oflS
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 197 of 199
E. A report to the Environmental Services staff on the results of the
relocation of gopher tortoises shall be provided within thirty days of
relocation. The report must contain the following information:
· the number of burrows excavaled,
· the number of tortoises relocated, and
· the final relocation site,
6, ARCHITECTURAL
A. All buildings, lighting, signage, and landscaping shall be architecturally
and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include: a
similar architectural design and use of similar materials and colors
throughout all of the buildings, signs, and fences/walls to be erected on all
of the subject parcels, Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be
similar in design throughout the subject site. Within any multi-family
project all roofs, except for carports, shall be peaked and finished in tile or
metal. Within any single-family or two-family project all roofs, except for
carports, shall be peaked and finished in tile, metal, or architecturally-
designed shingles (such as Timberline).
7. OPERATIONAL CHARAClERISTICS FOR ALF UNITS
A. Care units may be composed of one or more types of carelhousing
facilities. These carelhousing types include, but are not limited to
independent living, assisted living, and nursing homes, each of which can
have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of
care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the
characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a
care unit:
(i) There shall be on-site dining facilities for the residents
with food service being on-site or catered
(ii) Group transportation services shall be provided for the
residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of
shopping. Individual transportation services shall be
coordinated for the residents needs, including but not
limited to medical office visits.
(iii) There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator
to assist residents, and shall be responsible for planning
and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents.
(iv) A wellness facility shall be provided on-site to provide
for exercise and general fitness opportunities for the
residents.
Revised 1-12-10 Page 14 of 15
Agenda Item No, 17 A
February 23, 2010
Page 198 of 199
(v) Each unit shall be equipped with a device to notify
emergency service providers in the event of a medical or
other emergency.
(vi) For independent living units, each unit shall be designed
so that a resident is able to age in place. For example,
kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to
accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms
may be retrofitted to add grab bars.
Revised 1-12-10 Page 15 of 15
Agenda Item No, 17A
February 23, 2010
Page 199 of 199
-- --~.'
Naples Daily N8WlI. SUnday, February 7, 2010 . 21D
~~'------~"-
._~ M ~_
. ",
NonCE OF INTENT'
TO CONSIDER ~INANCE
Notice Is hereby given that on TUES-
DAY, FEBRUARY 23. 2010, In !he
Boardroom, 3rd Floor, AdmlnistTation
Building. Collier County Government
Center" 3~O1.. East rami.mt Tr.iI.
'Naples. FlorJdii; the BOIrd of County'
Commlsslonen, will consider the enact.
ment of _. Courity Ordinance. , The
rrieeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
.The titre of the proposed Ordinance II
as follows: -. :,:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE. ICARD OF.,
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Of COWER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. AMENDING 'ORDf..
NANCE NUMBER 2004-41. AS AMEND-
ED, THE COLLIER COUNTY lAND DE.
VELOPMENT CODE WHICH INQ.UDES
THE COMPREHENSM _ ZONING REGU-
LAnONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED
AREA OF COLliER _ COUNTY. FLORIOA.
BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE
ZONING ATLAS MAP -OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING OASSlACA.
TION OF THE HJ:REIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERlY FROM PLANNED UNIT DE-
VELOPMENT (PUO) AND" AGRlCULTUR.
Al (A) TO MIXED USE PlANNED UNIT
. DEVELOPMENT (MPUO) FOR A PROJ-
ECT KNOWN AS THE MAGNOLIA
POND MPUD. FOR PROPERTY . LOCATED
ON THE NORTH sloe 'OF INTERSTATE
75, 1/2' MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULE-
VARD (9S1), IN SECTION 34, TOWN-
SHIP 49 SOl/Tli, RANGE 26 EAST, COL.
lIER ,COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF -47.05+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR
THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER
9&-49. THE FORMER. MAGNOUA. POND
PUO; AND BY PROVIDING AN 'EFFEC-
TIVE DATE.
Petition: PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10318,Pa-
wel and .Teryl Brzeskl, -Magnolia Pond
Holdings. l.lt and Teryl Brzeskl, Trus-',
tee of the Land Trust .' 1-8. repre-
sented by. Davidson Englnee-rlng and
Patrick. \lVhite of Porter, Wright, Morris
& Arthur, LLP, are requesting . rezone
from the Magnolia Pond Planned Unit
Development (PUD),. Ordinance No.
98-49, and Rural. AQrkutture (A) Zon-'
lng Districts to.. a MixeCf.;1JR Planned.
Unit Development-{MPUD) to be
known as Magnolia Pond MPUD. per.
mitting 231 multi-family ,dwelling
units and/or an assisted living' f.cil/ty
(AlF) at a floor area. ratio of O.60.wttfl
the applicant see~ing to add an addi-
tional S aues.to the site. The subject
property Is 47.05+1- aues and Is !lXal-
ed on. thl!l north side' of 1-75 right-of-
way and half mile west of Collier Soul-
"
Legals
.
tvaref (CR-951) In Section 34. 'Township
49 South, Range 26 East. Colljer Cou~
ty, Florida. ." _ .
Copies of the pro~ed Ordinance are
on flle with the Clerk to the Board and
are avaiia~e for Inspection.' All. inter-
estetI pardes are Invited to attend and
be M.rd, , .. ..,
NOTE:. " All pel10M wishIng to speale'
on any agenda Iten,must register wtth
the Cournv administrator. p!lor to prt-
sentltlon of the .nda Item. to be..
addressed. IndivldualSpeileers will be '
limited to 5 minutes on any ftem. The
selectIon of. an Individual to lIpeak on
behaH ,of an orglJ1l%ation. or grouP. Is
encouraged. 'f.. recognized, by ,the
Chairman. Ii ipOkespenon for. a group
or organization may be ,allottee! 10
minutes to speak on an Item. "
Persons wishing to have written or
I. graphic materials lnduded .In' the
Board .gend. . packets must submlt
said material _ minimum of 3 weeks
C. rior to the respective public hearing.
n any case, written materials Intended
'to be conslde~ by the Board shall be
submitted, to the, appropriate County
staff' a 'minimum Of seven days prior to
the publk hearing. All material used
In presentations 6efore the Board wtll
become a. permanent part. of the. re.-
cord. ...
Any per$OO who decides io appeai "
decision Of the Board wI".need a re-
cord of' the proceedings _ pertaining
thereto andttierefore, may need to
ensure that a verbatim recOrd of the
proceedings 'Is made, Which reCOrd In-; J
dudes the, testimony ,and evidence
upon which the appeal is based. '.
If you' are a person with .a disabilItY
who needs any accommodation In or-
der to participate in this proceeding.
you are entitled, at no cost to yol,l. to'
the provision, of- certain .asslstance.'
Please contact the Collier County, Fa-,
dUties, Management Department" 10-
alted at 3301 Tamlaml Trail East.
Building' W, ,; Naples. FIOI'ida34112,
{239)2S2-83BO; Asslsteq listening de-.
vices for the hearing impaireCf are
available In the County Commission-
~rs' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DONNA'FIALA. OiAlRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK. ClERK
, '8?E ,Teresa Polaski. 'Oeputy Clerk
r ~P~~rv 7;010 . Nn'R~17q7,