Agenda 12/13/2011 Item #16A1712/13/2011 Item-16.A.17.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve revisions to the Golden Gate City Roadway Beautification Master
Plan.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval from the Board of County Commissioners for the. Golden
Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan revisions.
CONSIDERATIONS: On December 20, 1983, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Ordinance 83 -55 for the creation of Golden Gate Parkway Municipal Service Taxing Unit
(MSTU) (currently known as the Golden I Gate Beautification Advisory Committee MSTU;
Ordinance 96 -50, 09/03/96). A majority of voters approved levying taxes through a referendum
held on March 13, 1984, to provide curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance for
that portion of Golden. Gate Parkway lying between Santa Barbara Boulevard and County Road
951.
Through Ordinance 96- 51,.the boundaries were changed to include the area bounded by Green
Boulevard, Santa Barbara Boulevard , Collier Boulevard,(a/k/a County Road 95 1) , and Golden
Gate Canal. The Ordinance change also added accent lighting as an additional purpose of the
governing body.
In 2003, the Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan was referenced in
the Collier County Land Development Code in section 4.06.00 Landscaping, Buffering, and
Vegetation Retention as a guideline for improvements within the right -of -ways within the MSTU
boundaries. Since the Committee's inception, the Golden Gate MSTU has focused on creating a
unified community identity characterized by curbing, pavers, decorative street fixtures,
sidewalks, and plantings. It is through the efforts of the MSTU Committee that the community
has experienced a transformation of the Golden Gate neighborhood.
The Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan has been revised to
recognize the completed landscape improvement projects and provide an update of completed
construction costs and the project priority list that reflect the committee's activity. The Golden
Gate MSTU has successfully installed 4.1 miles of landscaping and irrigation utilizing the
Master Plan guidelines, which have been developed and refined through 27 years of existence.
Santa Barbara Boulevard from the Golden Gate Canal north to Green Boulevard had been
identified as a project to be completed by the MSTU in the original Master Plan but has since
been removed. The final two projects_ along Hunter Boulevard and Coronado Parkway,
identified in the Master Plan are underway and expected to be completed by December 2011.
On July 12, 2011 the Golden Gate MSTU Advisory Committee approved bringing the proposed
revised master plan to the Board of County Commissioners for formal approval. Staff concurs
with this recommendation.
Packet Page - 1241 -
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
The Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan was reviewed by the
Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on September 7,2011, and it recommended -
changes to .Chapter 5.05.08 on page 3 -28. The change represented the clarification of the
courtesy non - binding review process. by the MSTU advisory committee of all Site Development
Plan submittals within the boundary of the MSTU. The review is intended to allow, for
exploration of opportunities for private/public partnerships for roadway beautification.
FISCAL_ UWPACT: The costs associated with recording will be incurred by the Golden Gate
MSTU (Fund 153). The Golden Gate MSTU projected FY -12 annual revenue of $243,600.00 is
based on the current .50 mill and is sufficient.to provide for ongoing maintenance of existing
improvements.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the County
Attorney's Office, is legally sufficient for Board action and only requires a majority vote for
approval —S.RT.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT EWPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated
with this Executive Summary.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve
the Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan revisions.
Prepared By: Pamela Lulich, Landscape Operations Manager, Alternative Transportation Modes
Department
Attachments: (1) Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan with strike
through, (2) Golden Gate Communities. Roadway Beautification Master Plan without strike -
through, (3) 07 -12 -11 Minutes of Golden Gate MSTU advisory committee, (4) 10 -05 -11 Minutes
Development Services advisory committee -
Packet Page -1242-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.A.17.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve revisions to the Golden Gate Communities'
Roadway Beautification Master Plan.
Meeting Date: 12/13/2011
Prepared By
Name: RichardDarryl
Title: Project Manager,Alternative Transportation Modes
11/16/2011 5:32:57 PM
Submitted by
Title: Project Manager,Alternative Transportation Modes
Name: RichardDarryl
11/16/2011 5:32:58 PM
Approved By
Name: HerreraGloria
Title: Management/Budget Analyst,Transportation Administr
Date: 11/17/20117:59:31 AM
Name: BellowsRay
Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 11/17/20114:50:43 PM
Name: BetancurNatali
Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Engineering & C
Date: 11/18/20114:23:40 PM
Name: LulichPamela
Title: Manager - Landscape Operations,Alternative Transpo
Date: 11/21/2011 11:30:20 AM
^ Name: AmoldMichelle
Packet Page -1243-
Title: Director - Alt Transportation Modes,Alternative Tr
Date: 11/21/2011 11:41:14 AM
Name: Casa] angui daNi ck
Title: Deputy Administrator - GMD,Business Management & Budget Office
Date: 11/22/20112:31:46 PM
Name: FederNorman
Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati
Date: 11/22/20114:29:51 PM
Name: TeachScott
Title: Deputy County Attorney,County Attorney
Date: 11/23/2011 10:29:25 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 11/23/20112:55:01 PM
Name: FinnEd
Date: 11/28/2011 11:27:42 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 11/30/2011 12:49:32 PM
Packet Page -1244-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
REVISED 03/2011
Community
Roadways
Beam ty cation
.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Golden Gate Community Roadways
Beautification Master Plan
Prepared For:
Collier County
Board of County Commissioners
and
Golden Gate Beautification
Municipal Services Taxing Unit, M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
Prepared By:
m2r&4 a 4
-r
Landscape Architecture
5079 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34113
(239) 417 -0707
03/1997, 0i/
2009,
03/20119
44:
9 /2nn
Packet Page -1246-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Honorable Fred W. Coyle, District 4, ChairmanDan a Fiala, h D st
i 1
Honorable Jim Coletta, District 5, Vice Chairman€ ,
District 4, 4ee C r�= r1z`i3
Honorable Donna Fiala, District I,Fr-a k Halal, D 'ter e-t--2
Honorable Georgia A. Hiller, Esq., District 2 , ,str-iet 3
Honorable Tom Henning, District 3j "Gvietta,, DisLr=et-5
GOLDEN GATE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Richard Sims, Chairman
Patricia Spencer, Vice Chairman P y 14
Peggy Harris Michael Me ey
Michael McElroy
Barba. Segura
Barbara Segura
COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION
Norman E. Feder, Ate, Administrator
CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODES DEPARTACENT
01/2009
Packet Page -1247-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Michelle E. Arnold, Director
Darryl Richard, RLA, Project Manager
Tessie Sillery, M.S.T.U. Operations Coordinator
01/2009
Packet Page -1248-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
03/199 -7 ,0
2009,
03/201193,4
9 9-94
Packet Page -1249-
TABLE OF REVISIONS
Section Title Date Paqe Figure /Table
Table of Revisions 11/24/97 R -1
5 Site Furnishing 6 Fixtures 11/24/97 5 -3
General Document Revisions 03/12/97
Appendix G Maintenance Specifications 03/09/98
1 - 11 General Document Revisions 03/2011 All All ALL
�a Genet�G! neeument Bevis #ens 61,12099 4_44 4-44 A1313
01/2009
03/2011
Packet Page -1250-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Formatted: Centered
Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 10 pt
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page Figure /Table
1. Introduction ........ ............................... 1 -1
Overview.. ............................... 1-2
Master Plan Roadways Map 1 -4 1
Beautification M.S.T.U. Boundary
Roadway Legend
2. Goals and Objectives ...............................
2 -1
3. Existing Conditions and Constraints ................
3 -1
Project Area
Climate
Soil and Topography
Area Vegetation ..........................
3 -2
Water Resources for Irrigation
Well System
Surface Water (Canal) ....................
3 -3
Reclaimed Water
Potable or Treated Water
Master Plan Roadway Corridors: ..............
3 -4
1. Coronado Parkway
Description .........................
3 -5
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -6
2. C.R. 951, South
Part "A"
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
Part "B"
(Golden Gate Pkwy, to Green Blvd.)
Description .........................
3 -7
Photograph and Section /Elevation......
3 -9
3 -10
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
Description .........................
3 -11
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -12
4. Green Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -13
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -14
3 -15
5. Hunter Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -16
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -17
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Description .........................
3 -18
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -19
7. Sunshine Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -20
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -21
8. Tropicana Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -22
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -23
(T -1)
Packet Page -1251-
R
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
03/1997
0 1,120 119. ';- r9
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
3(cont.)
Collier County Landscape Related
Codes, Ordinances, Master Plans, Guidelines and Standards. 3-
24
Collier County Landscape Beautification
Master Plan
Collier County Land Development Code
Chapter 2.03.07 Corridor Management
Overlay District
Chapter 4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway
Professional Office Commercial Overlay
District
- Chapter 4.06, Landscaping and Buffering
,.. - -.- 9.92.. _ ..
G�VeEl _sTrf `
Chapter 5.05.08, Architectural and Site
Design Standards and Guidelines
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
Ordinance 93 -64, Public Rights -of -way
Construction Standards
ea �_va�
el-i
--
Summary and Rec- ;mmendaticr,s for oun1
e 'fl
Code.. ^ems- in47y cara�- !4_ntcr "laR
Existing Pedestrian and Roadway Lighting
Existing Pedestrian Walkways and Bike Pathways
Community Gateway and Entry Roadway Signage
Roadway Beautification Attitude Survey
Existing Community Entry Signage
3 --_-z-30
12
4. Typical Beautification Plan Concepts for Roadways....
4 -1
Uncurbed 14 feet or wider & curbed 20 feet or
wider medians
Type I, II, III & IV
Curbed Medians 20 to 8 foot wide
Type V & VI
Curbed 8 to 6 foot or less separators or median
Uncurbed Roads In -road Pathways Facility
Concepts
Recommended Beautification Concepts for the
Beautification M.S.T.U. Arterial /Collector
Roadways ....... ...............................
4 -?4
1. Coronado Parkway
-9-±:
2. C.R. 951, South,
-
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
Part "B" (Golden Gate Pkwy, to Green Blvd.)
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
4. Green Boulevard
5. Hunter Boulevard
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
7. Sunshine Boulevard
8. Tropicana Boulevard
S mmary
:-
Four lane road in -road facility
4 -8
Two lane road in -road facility
4 -9
5. Plan Elements and Design Standards ................. 5 -1
(T -2)
Packet Page -1252-
13
14
03/1997
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Community Colors
Pedestrian /Bicycle Pathway Facilities
Pathways Facility Design Standards
Pedestrian Crosswalk Marking
Curbing
Decorative Paving
Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
5 cont. Soil Analysis and Preparation
Site Furnishings and Fixtures
Street Identity and Traffic Control Signage
Landscape Sight Distance and Sight Windows
Major Intersections
Landscape Design Standards & Guidelines....... 5 -5
Existing or Proposed Curbed Roadways
Collier Blvd. C.R. 951, South
Part "A" (G.G. Canal to G.G. Pkwy.)
Part "B" (G.G. Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
-onado Parkway
-Hu-ter Boulevard
Sunshine Boulevard
Tropicana Boulevard
Golden Gate Parkway, East
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Phase I, (Sir lane improved. se ^t:i.on^
(G-G- anal to ^ercrado Pkwv.)
Phase II,( Four lane unimproved sec *ion �e
(Coronado Pi: ;y. to Green, Blvd.
Existing Uncurbed Roadways
Green Boulevard
Irrigation Water Resources and Irrigation
Systems ....... ............................... 5 -8
Reclaimed Water Transmission Line Systems
Reclaimed Water Tanker Applied
Well and Pump Transmission Line System
Potable / Treated Water
Conventional Pop -up Spray Systems
Irrigation, Plant Material & Maintenance
Specifications . ............................... 5 -10
Roadway and Traffic Control Signage Details..... 5 -11 15
Curbed Turn Lane & Decorative Paving Detail..... 5 -12 16
Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm Detail ............. 5 -13 17
Street /Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures...... 5 -19 18
Sight Distance Diagrams ....................... 5 -15 18A
Sight Window Diagrams ....................... 5 -16 18B
6. Beautification Improvement Costs and Considerations. 6 -1
(T -3) 03/1997
03/20__:; "_,'z..
Packet Page -1253-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
- "Formatted: Indent: Left: 0"
Formatted: Font: 9 pt
Coronado Parkway ............................
Collier Blvd. C.R. 951, South
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
Part "B" (Golden Gate Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
Golden Gate Parkway, East ...................
Green Boulevard .............................
Hunter Boulevard ............................
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North ..............
Sunshine Boulevard ..........................
Tropicana Boulevard .........................
7. Phasing and Funding Schedules .....................
6 -3 1
6 -4 2
6 -5 3
6 -6 4
6 -7 5
6 -8 6
6 -9 7
6 -10 8
6 -11 9
7 -1
Collier Countv Transportation Services and
Golden Gate M.S.T.L'. Community Roadwav
Landscaping Priorities ....................... 7-1
Golden Gate Beautification Master Plan
Multiple Year Funding and Phasing Schedule.... 7 -4 10
se' rndti3e ........ ...............................
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
B. Appendix:
References
A. Master Plan Graphic Elements
Typical Roadway Landscape Plans
Type T1 through Type T6
(T -4)
Packet Page -1254-
03/1997
0 /20 11 :g
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 1
INTRODUCTION
Collier County Government, along with the residents of the
Golden Gate Community, through a public /private partnership
since 1983, have been working together to perform roadway
landscape beautification within the Golden Gate Beautification
Municipal Services Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.). To date this
partnership has accomplished many of its initial goals and
completed six (6) miles of roadway median landscape
beautification within its M.S.T.U. boundary. The completed
roadways are Golden Gate Parkway east of Santa Barbara Blvd.,
Collier Blvd., Tropicana Blvd. and Sunshine Blvd.
The residents of the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U.
recognized the need and economic benefits associated with
roadway landscape beautification. The Golden Gate Beautification
M.S.T.U. is a local precinct voter referendum ad valorem taxing
district established for roadway corridor beautification and
maintenance purposes. The M.S.T.U. was established through
Collier County Ordinances (No.83 -55, Rev.96 -51 & No.87 -78,
Rev.96 -50), and is under the authority of the Board of County
Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners appoints a five
member Advisory Committee consisting of residents that reside
within the M.S.T.U. beautification district boundaries. The
Committee makes recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners on the operation and budgeting of the M.S.T.U. on
a monthly basis. The day -to -day administration of the M.S.T.U.
is administered through the Collier County Transportation
Services Division, Alternative Transportation Modes Department.
The Advisory Committee, after completing the initial Golden Gate
Parkway median landscape beautification project, concluded that
a Master Plan encompassing all the community roadways was needed
in order to properly understand and guide the Committee and
Community in proceeding with present and future beautification
projects.
This Roadway Beautification Master Plan will provide the
guidance, by which the Golden Gate Community will significantly
enhance its image while creating a vision for the future.
Aesthetically enhanced and well maintained roadways are the
first image of a Community's economic vitality and self pride.
Landscaped roadway corridors help to increase property values
and encourage new residents and businesses to locate within a
Community.
1 -1
Packet Page -1255-
03/1997
0'_/201191 -,'299
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
OVERVIEW
For purposes of this Master Plan the Golden Gate Community will
consist of a 4 square mile unincorporated area of Collier
County. The Community contains a community center, shopping
centers, recreation facilities, schools, library, fire station,
police facilities, and government meetings center. The
Beautification M.S.T.U. District also contains local businesses,
single and multi - family residents within the Community.
The Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U. District encompasses a 4
square mile area known as Golden Gate City (See Figure 1). The
M.S.T.U. District is located approximately 4.5 miles east of the
City of Naples. The M.S.T.U.'s eastern boundary is the eastern
right -of -way of (C.R. 951) Collier Blvd.; the northern boundary
is the north right -of -way of Green Blvd.; the west boundary is
the west right -of -way of Santa Barbara Blvd.; and the south
boundary is the Golden Gate Canal. The M.S.T.U. District is
bordered to the north, east and west by an area known as Golden
Gate Estates which consist dominantly of residentially zoned
property. To the south by the Golden Gate Canal which is abutted
by the Golden Gate Regional Park, Golden Gate High School and
several residential planned unit developments.
A major influence upon the Golden Gate Community is the
Interstate 75 roadway corridor which passes within less than one
mile of the M.S.T.U.'s south and west boundary lines. There are
three Interstate 75 interchanges (Pine Ridge Road, Golden Gate
Parkway and Collier Blvd.) that greatly impact this community.
Bisecting the M.S.T.U. District from east to west is the Golden
Gate Parkway roadway corridor which is a major east /west traffic
corridor from the City of Naples and the Interstate 75 and
Golden Gate Parkway interchange into the Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Community. This roadway has been designated with a Parkway
status and listed as a major corridor roadway in the "Corridor
Management Study" dated 1988 and the "Collier County Streetscape
Master Plan" dated 1997. In 2006 the eastern portion of Golden
Gate Parkway within the M.S.T.U. District received special
development designations through the adoption of the Golden Gate
Master Plan.
In May of 1996 the Beautification Advisory Committee voted to
develop and began a process through public meetings /workshops,
working with County staff and the District landscape
architectural consultant to create a Community Roadways
Beautification Master Plan. The plan would address the County
and Community major internal and external arterial and collector
1 -2 03/1997
03/20110+ %090
Packet Page -1256-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
roadways that are within or would have a major influence on the
M.S.T.U. District.
The Master plan addresses the following elements:
1. Goals and Objectives
2. Site Inventory and Analysis
3. Concept Development
4. Written and graphic guidelines to assist in the
Community's roadway beautification efforts.
5. Cost Budgeting and Implementation Phasing
The Master plan is based on the concerns, observations and
desires identified by the general Public, Residents, Civic
organizations, Advisory Committee, County staff and Consultants.
In order to provide for roadway beautification and continued
landscape maintenance to enhance the Community's image, pride,
and economic vitality while providing for pedestrian and
vehicular safety.
Historical References:
On May 27, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Formatted: N. .derline
considered Agenda Item 8 (B), (1) which recommended the approval
of the Golden Gate Community Roadways Beautification Master
Plan, accept the annual maintenance cost for the Golden Gate
Parkway and to enter into a funding partnership for the
beautification of the medians on CR 951 (Collier Blvd.) and
north Santa Barbara Blvd. within the boundaries of the MSTU. The
BCC approved the Master Plan concept, agreed to take over the
annual maintenance costs on the Golden Gate Parkway and directed
that the beautification of medians CR 951 and Santa Barbara
Blvd. be considered for future budget cycles. In page eight of
the executive summary the cost estimates for Santa Barbara Phase
1 and Phase 2 provided to the BCC for north Santa Barbara Blvd.
from Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.
On February 3, 1998 Agenda Item 16(B),(5) The BCC approved "
`_ pp �� Formatted: NO Underline
Consider a County Arterial Roadway Landscape Improvement Funding
Partnership with the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU for CR 951
where the Golden Gate MSTU requested a two year funding
partnership for CR 951. The Golden Gate MSTU funded the median
improvements on the southern portion of CR 951 ( Part "A ") at
the estimated cost of $213,000 during the Fiscal Year 1997- 1998
and that the County would fund the median landscape improvements
on the northern portion of CR 951 ( Part "B) at the cost of
$294,000. The County would then assume the annual maintenance of
costs for both sections estimated at $132,000 per year.
1 -3 03/1997
03/201101,'29P9
Packet Page -1257-
The Board of County Commissioners in 2003 incorporated the
"Golden Gate Community Roadways Beautification Master Plan" into
the Collier County Land Development Code.
In April 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the
"Collier County Beautification Master Plan" which addressed the
existing and future roadway landscape beautification and
maintenance of the arterial roadways within the Golden Gate
Community 4 square mile area addressed by this Master Plan. The
roadways affected by the "Collier County Beautification Master
Plan" are Golden Gate Blvd., Collier Blvd., Pine Ridge Road,
Logan Blvd., Santa Barbara Blvd., Golden Gate Parkway west of
Santa Barbara Blvd. and the Interstate 75 interchanges.
Based upon the above the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee, in 2006 recommended an updating of this
Master Plan.
1 -4 03/1997
03/201191,12009 �
Packet Page -1258-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
T aa16Td
P—TnoH E[ -Fdo3S '8
PzF-fluTnOH wuTxVsuQS
'L
tr3ON 'P—TnoH e-gmg e4T1eS
-9
PM o!Pezd
P=e&eTnoH -Ta4txri
*S
P2eI-sTnoH UBeZED
11
gse3 ')W-[2ed 64E1 —P-10E)
'£
'PATS —0-RD -4
'..5, wed 'tpnoS ' (TS6 'x':))
&'31d '9'9 C,4 T—eo e4q USPTo`J
gzed lg4noS ' (TS6 '2i'D)
pzeAeTnoS sa?TTo'J
Z
t%(22d opeu=oo
-1
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
5 -T
mmwra 'n'a's'ra
SXW -NaVUd MUd LDLT+EiJ=.T. lM — — — — — —
is
,rwwa,n
11 p • 9Y
l Nd 31d
i #
n M� a 3. a ' S S 9� •� i i � �
3 9 sv r i
AAAd ayav uap!oc)
y , u 6Z A.
9Z LZ'e
6 Av MLLL ci = 4Oi 7� 4 obi r + Y i d.
o 10 s
?D -
a p�
1S A.
., AV �u,� • wa ,
a . p
9� Y s Y 4 ixsAr�
... wc, PM6 uaeJE)
1S AY 1
F
K AY Ntl M Av wR
9l
PMe a3!4M pa a6p d au!d
[VPV (ry T�,7�/ /TT Tll1T ATT 7/T
(I �/ ��// �� ll /` �/ Packet Page - 1259 -
T
CL
oz
l 60, hl
'I
isl\:—larlk
3
N
m
V
w
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 2 n
GOALS and OBJECTIVES
The Master plan goals and objectives for roadway landscape
beautification strived to established the purposes for roadway
beautification while encouraging the community and government to
work together in order to reach the goals. The goals and
objectives were developed to encourage the community to strive
beyond the norm while being realistic in scheduling and cost.
Goals and objectives should not be considered permanent, but
must be reviewed and reset as they are reached or change. The
objectives will establish the directions or means by which the
community will follow iri achieving the goals. The objectives
should be considered directives and guidelines which are
transformable into policies or programs.
GOAL #1 Enhance the visual quality and economic vitality
of the community through roadway corridor
beautification while improving the health, safety,
welfare, and quality of life for the residents and
visitors.
Objectives 1.1:
Encourage adjacent roadway property owners to install, upgrade
and maintain roadside landscaping by providing assistance and
landscaping expertise to the property owner.
Objectives 1.2:
Request and assist Collier County Government in implementation
and enforcement of the Land Development Code requirements for
installation and maintenance of landscape buffers adjacent to
roadway corridors. Petition the Board of County Commissioners to
allow the Beautification Advisory Committee to review and
provide recommendation on proposed development landscape plans
in order to assure coordination with the Community's Roadway
Landscape Master Plan.
Objectives 1.3:
Encourage Collier County Government, property Owners, businesses
and community developments within and beyond the M.S.T.U.
boundaries to participate in landscape beautification of the
roadway corridors located adjacent to their property.
2 -1
Packet Page -1260-
03/1997
8?- 03/9992011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
^. Objectives 1.4:
Enhance Community identity and unity by developing a set of
coherent beautification guidelines and standards for roadway
corridors. This can be accomplished through the selection and
coordination of lighting fixtures, site furnishing, plant
materials and roadway signage.
GOAL #2 Develop a Roadway Landscape Beautification Master
Plan which will guide the Community, Collier
County Government and the Beautification Advisory
Committee in implementing future roadway
beautification projects within and adjacent to
the Golden Gate Community. .
Objectives 2.1:
Incorporate South Florida Water Management District's, South
Florida Edition "Waterwise" G-&�Florida Landscapes " — guide to
landseapinq to promote water conservation usina eEineiel
Principles of guld_elines and ie Xeriscape'. —pr ne -iples i-nte the
Eeaelway landseape p l antd:ngs and ffla i n te ee—gu iele l i ne s
Objective 2.2•
Incorporate and /or expand upon existing County codes, standards
or guidelines, as well as the Golden Gate Master Plan polices
relating to landscaping of adjacent roadway properties and the
roadway corridors.
Objective 2.3•
Utilize native or naturalized Southern Florida plant species.
Objective 2.4:
Research and analyze the availability and use of reused water
for roadway landscape irrigation.
Objective 2.5:
Improve pedestrian /bicycle circulation and facilities.
Objective 2.6:
Improve and expand street lighting for vehicular and pedestrian
safety.
Objective 2.7•
Review traffic calming techniques and devices for possible
implementation on proposed and existing roadways.
Objective 2.8•
Incorporate the Florida Department of Transportation landscape
2 -2
Packet Page -1261-
03/1997
8-3-0 3/ 2 9 9 9.2 011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
standards and guidelines to the greatest extent practical into
the proposed Master Plan standards.
Objective 2.9:
Increase and enhance visibility of pedestrian roadway crossings
for safety purposes.
Objectives 2.10:
Develop beautification improvements that provide for reduced
long range maintenance.
Objectives 2.11:
Develop a Master Plan that will allow for roadway beautification
capital improvements and maintenance of roadways within the
M.S.T.U. based upon the existing tax millage revenues.
GOAL #3 Develop a phasing and funding strategy for the
implementation of the Community roadways
landscape beautification programs and projects.
Objectives 3.1:
Encourage continuation of the public /private partnership with
Collier County Government. Assist Collier County Government in
expediting its landscape development plans for arterial roadway
corridors which run through the Beautification M.S.T.U. and
community.
Objectives 3.2:
Encourage community organizations and residents to participate
beyond the existing beautification tax revenues by providing
additional funding and support to the beautification efforts.
Objectives 3.3:
Analyze the consequences of expanding the M.S.T.U. boundaries
for additional areas beautification and funding.
Objectives 3.4:
Identify and review Government grants, programs or funds that
could provide assistance or funding for beautification.
Objectives 3.5:
To convince Collier County Board of County Commissioners to
accept and fund landscape maintenance responsibility on the
major county arterial roadways within the M.S.T.U.
Objectives 3.6:
Assist the Collier County Government in identifying arterial and
collector roadways that are in need of roadway maintenance to
2 -3
Packet Page -1262-
03/1997
{�03/299 2011
n
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
address resurfacing, restriping, and drainage improvements for
the safety of the residents and users.
2 -4
Packet Page -1263-
03/1997
3�03/2 99 92011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS and CONSTRAINTS n
Project Area
The M.S.T.U. district includes 12( + / -) miles of Collier County
arterial and collector roadway corridors. All the roads are four
lane median divided roadways, except for the western one mile of
Green Blvd. which is a two lane road.
Climate
The Golden Gate area would be described as a typical inland sub-
tropical climatic zone. The area is subject to yearly frost and
freezing temperatures of 26 to 28 degrees. The coldest
temperatures generally occur during the winter months of
December, January and February. During the summer months of June
through September the area is exposed to high temperatures and
humidity levels in the 80 and 90 percent range. The annual
rainfall exceeds 50 inches with 75 percent occurring during the
summer months of June through September. The Golden Gate area
during the peak of the rainy season experiences severe
thunderstorms that generate damaging winds and heavy rain fall
up to 3 to 4 inches per storm. The roadway medians have micro -
climates created within them due to the large amounts of
pavement surrounding them. Road temperatures can reach well
above 100 degrees during the day and maintain over a 100 degrees
well after sunset. These above conditions combined with the auto
exhaust, water pollution, blown debris and increased wind
generated from the passing vehicles creates a very harsh
environment within the medians for plants to survive in.
Soil and Topography
The roadway corridors are generally level with elevation changes
of four feet or less. The roadway is typically crowned to the
center to create a positive drainage pattern to the right -of -way
swales or curbed storm water drainage system. As typical with
most roadways, the soil used to raise the elevation and
construct the roadway were intermixed and imported from other
areas of the county. The soil within the roadway medians is
typically an intermixed stabilization material containing large
amounts of crushed limestone material and sand. It has a high PH
level of 8 or above. These soils are susceptible to compaction,
hydrophobic, poorly aerated and poor percolation. They have
limited water and nutrient holding capacities making them
unsuitable for landscape purposes. Sporadically throughout the
Golden Gate M.S.T.0 area is a sub - surface layer of cap rock or n
3 -1
Packet Page -1264-
03/1997
03/201101/12999
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
limestone. It ranges in depth from 18 to 36 inches below the
surface.
It is recommended prior to excavation or installation of any
utilities below 18 inches, that test borings be performed. In
most cases soil amendments or excavation to add new soil will be
required in order to provide improved soil conditions for
landscaping.
Area Vegetation
The roadway rights -of -way corridors have been totally cleared of
any existing native vegetation. The dominate vegetation
community surrounding the area is a pine flat -wood forest and
transitional pine /cypress forest. The dominant tree species is
the slash pine and the dominant under -story vegetation is the
saw palmetto with intermixed pond cypress, Dahoon holly and Wax
myrtle. Much of the area vegetation is in transition from
wetlands to uplands due to the past alteration of the surface
water and natural drainage.
Water Resources for Irrigation
There are four main water supply sources within the Golden Gate
area that can be used for landscape irrigation purposes.
1. Well
2. Surface Water (canal)
3. Reclaimed Wastewater
4. Potable or Treated Water
The following is a list of advantages and disadvantages for each
source:
Well System
Advantage:
Location flexible requiring minimum piping, no continuous water
cost, reduced overall system cost.
Disadvantage:
Permitting required, water could contain iron & sulfur, limits
on gallons pumped per day, no backup when problems occur, annual
metering cost, subject to water restrictions, reduces a limited
natural resource.
3 -2
Packet Page -1265-
03/1997
03/2011°„�1G9
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Surface Water,(canal)
Advantage:
Source located close to all project site areas, low start up
cost, no continuous water cost, reduced overall system cost.
Disadvantage:
Additional permitting cost required; no continuous recharge
source; demand would lower canal water levels; uncontrolled
potential contamination; annual metering cost. The source and
level of water in the canals is dependent on rainfall which
occurs in this area during the months that irrigation
requirements is typically less, subject to water restrictions,
reduces limited natural resource.
Reclaimed Wastewater
Advantage:
Reuse of natural resource, low cost per gallon, provides outlet
for wastewater treatment facilities to discharge reclaimed
water. Florida Cities Wastewater treatment facility is located
within M.S.T.U. boundary and could supply quantity required. A
Collier County reclaimed water pipe line existing at the
intersection of Collier Blvd. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Reuse
water can also be applied by truck and use of reclaimed water is
an environmentally friendly irrigation method.
Disadvantage:
High initial start up cost for a piping system within the
M.S.T.U. area; Florida Cities' plant must be upgraded in order
to supply proper quality of water; a 3 mile pipe line must be
installed in order to connect to Collier County's reclaimed
water discharge system; reuse water quantity available at time
of year when watering is in demand.
Potable or Treated Water
Advantage:
Initial low start up cost; clean water source; source close to
project area requiring minimum piping.
Disadvantage:
High per gallon cost, not available to all project areas,
subject to water restrictions, reduces limited natural resource.
The following written roadway descriptions an
sections are of all the major County arterial
roadways within the 4 square mile Golden Gate
3 -3
Packet Page -1266-
d pictorial cross
and collector
Community area.
03/1997
03/201191,x99
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
n The written descriptions are an assessment of the existing
conditions and contain a brief description about the roadway,
signalized intersections, curbing, median description, side
right -of -way areas, roadway signage, overhead utilities, roadway
lighting, pedestrian walkways, bike pathways, and roadside
development.
The pictorial cross sections locations were selected to show the
best typical example of the existing roadway and dimensions of
the existing rights -of -way and roadway facilities.
Roadway Number Name
1 Coronado Parkway
2 C.R. 951, South
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
3 Golden Gate Parkway, East
(C.R. 951 to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
4 Green Blvd.
5 Hunter Blvd.
6 Santa Barbara Blvd., North
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
7 Sunshine Blvd.
8 Tropicana Blvd.
3 -4
Packet Page -1267-
03/1997
'
03/2011^' ��, -229
Roadway #1
Coronado Parkway Existina Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions: A .90 mile roadway running east and west within a 106 foot wide
road -righttof -way easement. There are two 2 lane bridges over
the Coronado Canal at the western end of the roadway between
54th Terr. SW and 55th St. SW. The road is an uncurbed divided
four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. This road
is a County collector roadway.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing: The medians are mostly uncurbed, except for turn lanes and the
median noses at the shopping center entrances along with the first
median at the intersection with Golden Gate Parkway. The curb is
mountable type "A" concrete curb.
Median Description: There exist .74 miles of median green area divided into 13
medians. The medians are grassed and generally level with the
pavement. The medians range in width from 8 to 9 feet at turn
lane locations to 18 feet.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The north and south sides have grassed utility strips, 5 foot wide asphalt
and /or concrete sidewalks and then a grassed swale adjacent to the
right -of -way lines.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4"x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are overhead electric transmission lines running along
the roadway behind the shopping center. Underground electric is
present within medians supplying the street lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street lights are
located in the medians and are double standard street light fixture
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
Pedestrian walkways:
There are 5 foot wide asphalt and /or concrete sidewalk along the north
and south rights -of -way.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
Along the south right -of -way line starting at the intersection with
Golden Gate Parkway the properties are commercially developed to
52nd Terr. SW, from there to one half -block back from Santa
Barbara Blvd. is single family and duplex residences. The half
block adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd. is developed as commercial.
Along the north right -of -way line starting at the intersection
with Golden Gate Parkway it is developed with Public facilities to
Lucerne Road, from Lucerne road to one half -block back from Santa
Barbara Blvd. is single family, multi - family and duplex
residences. The remaining half -block is developed as commercial.
3 -5
Packet Page -1268-
03/1997
01/2009
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
w
A
J
S A
Ow
S
N N
od Q
x
w L3
J
Q
U-) 3
I �
C�z
rw
w
iU
N 0-
N l7
Li Z
Q A D
W U
Q Q
CL Lo
I-
d z
w
F- F
W
N 1
(U Q
I �
w
Ifs q
J
= A
w
S �
df Q
tl'
w l.7
J
Q
3
Q
3
Y
ry
Q
tl
O
A
Q
z
0
ry
0
U
0
z
V)
X
W
J
Q
U
tl
r
H
N
N
W
Q0
I
M
Q1
lD
N
T-
4J
CO
[6
a
cu
Y
v
f6
d
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #2
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951.1 South Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions: A 2 mile roadway running north and south within a 100 foot
wide road right -of -way easement. This roadway will be
subdivided into two smaller sections. Part "A" is the southern one
mile south of Golden Gate Parkway and Part "B" is the northern
one mile north of Golden Gate Parkway. Both part "A" &'B" are
divided four lanes with curbed medians and curbed outside traffic
lanes. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH. The entire roadway is a
major County, Community and Golden Gate City arterial roadway.
The southern end of Part "A" ends at the first Naples northbound
Interstate 75 interchange. This roadway is a major entrance into
the Golden Gate Community. Part "B" roadway is built 50 feet
( + / -) into the existing 100 foot canal easement.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing: Part "A ": Medians and outside traffic lanes are all curbed with
vertical type "F" curb and gutter.
Part "B ": Medians and outside lanes are all curbed. The 3
medians between Golden Gate Parkway and 20th PI. have
vertical type "F" curb. The remaining medians from
20th Pl. to Green Blvd. have mountable type "E" curb.
The outside traffic lanes are curbed with vertical type
"F" curb and gutter. The medians with turn lanes
built in them have solid concrete separators the distance
of the stacking area of the turn lane.
Median Description: Part "A ": There exist .89 miles of median green area. The medians are
Improved with landscaping and irrigation. The medians
Generally are 18 feet wide.
Part "B ": There exist .90 miles of median green area. The medians are
improved with landscaping and irrigation.
Side Rights -of -Way: Part "A ": The west side right- of-way is a grassed shoulder that
slopes into a drainage swale. On the east side of the right -
of -way directly behind the curb is a standard metal
guardrail that extends the full length of the section of
roadway. From the back of curb, under the guardrail, a
distance of four feet ( + / -) is asphalt pavement. From
the end of the pavement under the guardrail starts a
grassed canal bank.
Part "B ": The west side right -of -way is grassed with a 5 foot
sidewalk along the right -of -way line. The grassed area
is either level with back of curb and /or sloping into a
drainage swale. The east side right -of -way has a grassed
retention swale varying in width starting at the back of
curb. This swale is prior to the canal top of bank. This
retention swale handles roadway drainage prior to
flowing into the adjacent canal.
Roadway signage: The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post and metal
poles.
3 -7 03/1997
01/2009
Packet Page -1270-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Page two
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), South
Overhead utilities:
Both Parts A & B have overhead electric transmission lines along
the west right -of -way line.
Roadway lighting:
Part "A ": There are no street lights continuously along the
roadway only at the intersections with other roads.
Part "B ": There are street lights continuously down both sides of
the roadway. The street lights are standard mansard arm
metal poles with cobra head light fixtures.
Pedestrian walkways:
Part "A ": There are no sidewalks on either side of the roadway.
Part "B ": There is sidewalk along 95% of west right -of -way.
Bike pathways:
Part "A ": There are no off -road or on -road designated facilities.
Part "B ": There is a 5 foot off -road facility shared with
pedestrians. -
Roadside Development:
Part "A ": Along the east right -of -way line is a 100 foot drainage
canal easement. Along the west right -of -way line from
the Golden Gate canal to a point 500 feet ( + / -), before
the intersection with Golden Gate Parkway is a golf
course facility. The remaining 500 feet is undeveloped
commercially zoned property.
Part "B ": Along the east right -of -way line is a 100 foot drainage
canal easement. The west right -of -way has heavy
roadside commercial development existing and the
remaining vacant property is zoned for continued
commercial development.
Landscape Development: Parts "A" and "B" median landscape and irrigation is complete. Fomwtted: No underline
3-8 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1271-
H
O
d
d
H
0
O
r
r
H
W �
Q0 w
v�
w
(n
H
v
ro
H
� tz]
N•
I �
N
M
0 aa nct r ogc -ici
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
W
i
N
O
n7
N•
G
(D
H
O
d
d
H
0
O
r
r
H
r
6
w
Ln
v
ro
H
bd
Packet f a 5 -.L4. ,
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Bike pathways:;; Two lane roadway in -road striped bike paths along both sides of the;:
roadway.
Roadside Development:' Along the northeastem right -of -way line starting at the intersection with,',,', '
Coronado. Parkway is 90% developed with single family or duplex
residences. Between 55th Ave. SW and Santa Barbara Blvd. North the'
properties are developed with office and commercial facilities. The
southwestern side of the roadway is developed to the extent and with.`
same types of developments as the northeastern side.;!s
3 -16 03/1997
0312011
Roadwav #3
Golden Gate Parkway, East Existing Conditions
(C.R. 951, South to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions: A 2.5 mile roadway running east and west within a 130 foot
Packet Page -1274-
wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a curbed divided
four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. This
roadway is a major County, Community and Golden Gate east /
west arterial roadway. This roadway is the main roadway through
the Golden Gate Community from the Naples Urban area.
Signalized intersection:
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Sunshine Blvd., Tropicana Blvd., 50th St. SW,
Santa Barbara Blvd.
Curbing:
The medians are curbed with mountable type "A" curbing.
Median Description:
There exist 1.9 miles of median green area. The medians are completely
landscaped and irrigated. The medians range in width from 10 feet to 38
feet ( + / -) at the widest points.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The north and south sides have grassed utility strips, 5 foot wide asphalt
and /or concrete sidewalks and then a grassed swale adjacent to the
right -of -way lines.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There is overhead electric transmission lines running along the right -of -
way lines. There exist electric underground and over head lines within
the medians that service the street lights located in the medians.
Roadway lighting:
The western portion of the roadway has street lights along the
right -of -way lines. The eastern portion has double headed street
lights located within the medians. The lights are standard cobra
Packet Page -1274-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1275-
head fixtures mounted on concrete poles.
Pedestrian walkways:
There are 5 foot wide asphalt and /or concrete sidewalks along the north
and south rights -of -way.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with
pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
The properties on the eastern half of the roadway from Sunshine
Blvd. to Collier Blvd, is about 98% developed with multi - family and
duplex residential along both sides of the roadway. Commercial
development occurs within the last block adjacent to C.R. 951.
The western half of the roadway is about 90% developed with
highway commercial and shopping center complexes. The
remaining properties are undeveloped, but zoned for commercial
uses.
J.andscape Development:
The median landscape and irrigation is complete --i Formatted: No underline
3 -11 03/1997
— 3/20113 2999
Packet Page -1275-
H
O
d
d
H
N
' r
d
N �
x
H
to
K
H
N•
ri
(D
Mi
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
rat r rL rasc -.if-,f U-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1277-
Roadway #4
Green Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) to
Logan Blvd. & Santa Barbara Blvd. North Intersection)
Roadway descriptions:
A 2 mile roadway running east and west within a 100
foot wide road right -of -way easement. The eastern portion from
Collier Blvd. to Sunshine Blvd. is an uncurbed divided four lane
roadway. The western portion from Sunshine Blvd. or the bridge to
Logan Blvd. is an uncurbed two lane roadway. The western two lane
portion is offset to the north side of the right -of -way easement.
The posted speed limit is 40 MPH. This road is a County arterial /
collector roadway along the north boundary of the Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Signalized intersection:
Santa Barbara Blvd. North, Sunshine & Collier Blvd,
Curbing:
The first median at the intersection with Collier Blvd. is curbed with
Type "D" concrete curb. The remaining medians are only curbed on
the noses with type "D" curb at the median openings.
Median Description:
There exist .90 miles of median green area divided into 5 medians.
within the eastern half of the roadway. The medians are grassed
and generally level with the pavement. The medians have a typical
width of 19'-6" ( + / -). The western half of the roadway has no
medians.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are typical grassed shoulders sloped down into a swale
system adjacent to the right -of -way lines.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
Overhead electric transmission lines run down the northern right -
of -way line about 95% of the roadway length.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway only at
the intersections with other roadways.
Pedestrian walkways:
From Collier Blvd. to Sunshine Blvd. there is a in road striped pedestrian
area along the south and north side of the road. From Sunshine Blvd. to
Santa Barbara Blvd. there is a 5 to 6 foot wide asphalt and concrete
sidewalk along the south right-of-way line.
Bike pathways:
Designated in- street, 7 -8 foot wide asphalt facility on
both sides of the four lane eastern portions of the roadway.
Designated off - street, 5 to 6 foot wide facility shared with
pedestrians along the eastern two lane portion.
Roadside Development:
The property along the north side of the roadway is zoned Estates
District. The properties along the south side of the roadway are over 50%
developed with multi - family residential units. The properties on the north
and south sides of the roadway are zoned commercial between Collier
Blvd. to 40th Ter. SW, but only the south side is developed.
3 -13 03/1997
01/2009
Packet Page -1277-
H
N
H
H
z
0
H
O
d
d
H
W
I
N
M
z
of
r
e1i
H
ro
0
H
H
O
z
ITI
Fl.
n
cD
'All
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1278-
10"*",
M
04
H
Ia
H
H
x
H
0
d
d
H
I �
N
Cn 1
n7
G
ri
lD
J
4?
M
Z
r
._}
Ian
H
ro
0
H
H
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
i a—'" - u5c -.i / a-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Hunter Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Coronado Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions:
A .90 mile roadway running northeast and southwest within a 106
foot wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a mostly
uncurbed divided four lane roadway. The posted speed limit
is 25 MPH. This road is a minor County collector roadway.
Signalized intersection:
West end at Santa Barbara Blvd. , NorthAlene
Curbing:
The medians are uncurbed.
Median Description:
There exist .84 miles of median green area divided into 11
medians. The medians are grassed and generally level with the
pavement or curb. The medians range in width from 8 -9 feet at
turn lane locations to 19'-6" ( + / -) at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The side rights -of -ways are grassed shoulders sloped into a
drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines along
the roadway. Underground electric is present within some medians
supplying the street lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
Pedestrian walkways:
There exist a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and north sides of the
roadway.
Packet Page -1280-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Bike pathways: Two lane roadway in -road striped bike paths along both sides of the
roadway.
Roadside Development: Along the northeastern right -of -way line starting at the intersection with
Coronado Parkway is 90% developed with single family or duplex
residences. Between 55th Ave. SW and Santa Barbara Blvd. North the
properties are developed with office and commercial facilities. The
southwestern side of the roadway is developed to the extent and with
same types of developments as the northeastern side.
3 -16 03/1997
03!2011
Roadwav #3'
Golden Gate Parkway, East Existing Conditions
(C.R. 951, South to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
�1
Roadway descriptions: A 2.5 mile roadway running east and west within a 130 foot
wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a curbed divided
four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. This
roadway is a major County, Community and Golden Gate east /
west arterial roadway. This roadway is the main roadway through
the Golden Gate Community from the Naples Urban area.
Signalized intersection: Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Sunshine Blvd., Tropicana Blvd., 50th St. SW,
Santa Barbara 'Blvd:
Curbing.. The medians are curbed with mountable type; "A" curbing.
Roadway signage: The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x:4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:' There's overhead electric transmission lines running along the right-of-
way lines. There exist electric underground and over head lines within
the medians that service the streetlights located in the medians.
Roadway.lighting: ! The western portion of the roadway has streetlights along the
right -of -way lines. The eastern portion has double headed street
lights located within the medians. The lights are standard cobra
Packet Page -1281-
W
I
N
J
N•
C
n
(D
KAW
M
H
N
H
H
z
H
0
d
d
H
x
H
w
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1282-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #6
Santa Barbara Blvd., North Existing Conditions Formatmd: No underline
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions: A 2.1 mile roadway running north and south along the west boundary of
the Golden gate Beautification M.S.T.U. There are 2 double lane
bridges over the Green and Golden Gate Canals. The northern portion
north of Coronado Blvd. is a mostly uncurbed divided four lane roadway.
The southern portion 1Aporox. 4.270 In. ft. north of the Golden Gate _ Formatted; F nt caor: rted
Canal is being widened under County's Santa Barbara Blvd.
construction project has been widened and the medians improved with _____ Formatted; Font color: Red
Type F curbing complying with the CCLB Master Plan. The posted speed
limit is 45 MPH. This roadway is a major County, Community and Golden
Gate M.S.T.U. arterial roadway.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway & Green Bivd. (Golden Gate Parkway intersection _ Formatted; Font color: Red
is designated a major intersection per the 1988 "Corridor Management
Study ")
Curbing: The northern portion medians are generally uncurbed except for the last
4 medians north and south of the Green canal bridge with mountable
type "A" curb The outside lanes between 18th Ave SW and Green Blvd
are curbed with vertical Woe "F" curb. The 8 medians anti nutslrie Innas
Median Description: There exist 1 mile of median green areas divided into 21 medians
The
northern 13.5 medians are grassed uncurbed and level with the
Pavement The medians range in width from 7 feet to 18 feet The
southern 7.5 medians are curbed filled and grassed The southern
Side Rights -of -Way:
Both sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on standard metal and /or 4" x 4"
wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are overhead electric transmission lines crossing and along the
west right -of -way line.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway only at
the intersections with other roadways.
Packet Page -1283-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Pedestrian walkways: The northern 6.764 In. ft. +/- of the roadway has
existing in -road and off road sidewalk facilities along the east side of the
roadway. The southern 4,270 In. ft. +/- of roadway has concrete
sidewalks along both sides
There exii;4�aff On Fead and 94 read sidev.,Rlk fanilities aleRg the east side
of the readway gfl!y. The seuthem 4,27-9 1R. #. of roadway neFth ef-44e
tea..
Bike pathways:
Roadside Development: The property along the west side of the roadway is generally zoned
Estates District and is about 25% developed with single family
residences. South of Golden Gate Parkway the properties are 50%
developed with private schools and church facilities. The
remaining properties are undeveloped. The east side of the
roadway is developed with a mix of commercial and multi-
family properties.
Packet Page -1284-
tSverhead`:utilities'
Roadway. lighting:
Pedestrian walkways.
signs :mounted 06 4" x 4" wood post.
There are no overhead electric transmission' lines along'
the roadway. Underground electric is present within some medians
supplying the street lights.!`
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. Thestreet light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
There exist a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and north sides of the
roadway.
Packet Page -1285-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
3 -18 03/1997
Roadway #5
Hunter Blvd. Existino Conditions
(Coronado Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions:
A .90 mile roadway running northeast and southwest within a 106,',
foot wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a mostly
uncurbed divided four lane roadway. The posted speed limit
is 25 MPH. This road is a'.minor County collector roadway.
Signalized intersection:,`
West end at Santa Barbara Blvd., NorthNene
Curbing:`
The medians are uncurbed.
Median Description:
There exist .84 miles of median green area divided into 11 -
medians. The medians are grassed and generally level with the
pavement or curb. The medians range in width from 8-9 feet at ;
turn lane locations to 19'-6" at the widest; locations. -
tSverhead`:utilities'
Roadway. lighting:
Pedestrian walkways.
signs :mounted 06 4" x 4" wood post.
There are no overhead electric transmission' lines along'
the roadway. Underground electric is present within some medians
supplying the street lights.!`
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. Thestreet light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
There exist a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and north sides of the
roadway.
Packet Page -1285-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
W
I
'TJ
r-
n
m
LIEN
2
H
O
d
H
O
d
d
H
N
I
rn
H
Gd
r
z
0
H
U)
O
t✓
c+
m
n
m
0
Ct
H-
O
I
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1286-
Roadway #7
Sunshine Blvd. Existing
Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions:
A 1.1 mile roadway running north and south within a 106
foot wide right -of -way easement. The northern most 850 feet
of the roadway is a typical asphalt pavement two lane road
off set to the east side of the right -of -way easement. There is a
two lane bridge in this most northern segment crossing the Green
Canal. The remainder of the road is a mostly uncurbed divided four
lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. This road is a
County north /south, collector roadway bisecting the northern half of
Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Signalized intersection:
Golden Gate Parkway and Green Blvd.
Curbing:
The median south of the Green canal are curbed with six inch
ht. vertical type "D" concrete curb.
Median Description:
There exist .78 miles of median green area divided into six
medians. The medians have landscaping and irrigation improvements.
The medians range in width from 7 feet at turn lane locations to 18 feet
at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines running along the
roadway, but overhead lines do cross the roadway. Underground electric
is present within some medians.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole. Decorative accent pedestrian lighting
Is existing at the ends of all medians.
Pedestrian walkways:
There is 5 foot wide sidewalks along the east and west rights-of-way
running from Golden Gate Parkway to 17th Avenue S.W. From 17th
Avenue S.W. to Green Blvd. the sidewalk is only along the east side of
the roadway. Pedestrian street crossings are marked.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
The property along both sides of the roadway is developed with multi-
family duplexes and apartments. The remaining properties are single
family homes or vacant properties. The Golden Gate Community Center
property is located at the N.W. comer with Golden Gate Parkway.
Traffic Calming:
In -road asphalt speed humps have been installed within the 20'h Place
S.W. intersection at the school crossing.
Landscape Develooment:
Median landscape irrigation and lighting improvement were
completed in 2007.
3 -20
Packet Page -1287-
03/1997
01/2009
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
W
I
N
N
'T1
r-
s✓
n
m
r�
0
H
N
H
H
z
H
d
d
H
N
N
x
H
ILLS
rZIL&CL rcISC -iZ-oo-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Al�\
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #8
Tropicana Blvd. Existino
Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East
to 32nd Ave. SW.)
Roadway descriptions:
A .80 mile roadway running north and south within road right -of -way
easement. There are two -2 lane bridges over the Tropicana Canal and a
bridge over the Golden Gate Canal for the entry into the high school. The
road is a curbed divided two lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 25
MPH. This road is a County north / south collector roadway bisecting the
southern half of Golden Gate M.S.T. U.
Signalized intersection:
Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing:
All medians are curbed with six inch vertical type "D" concrete curbing.
Median Description:
There exist .70 miles of median green area divided into six medians. The
medians have landscaping, accent lighting and irrigation improvements.
The medians range in width from 7 feet at turn lane locations to 18 feet
at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines running along
the roadway. Underground electric is present within medians
supplying the lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway. The existing
decorative light fixtures are located in the median ends
Pedestrian walkways:
There is 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and west sides of the
roadway approximately 3 feet off the pavement.
Bike pathways:
Two lane roadway in -road striped bike paths along both sides of the
roadway.
Roadside Development:
The property along both sides of the roadway is single family or duplex
residences. The remaining properties are undeveloped. Located on the
northwest corner of the intersection with 32nd Ave. SW is a wastewater
treatment facility.
Landscape Development:
Median landscape irrigation and lighting improvements were
completed in 2002.
3 -22 03/1997
03/2009
Packet Page -1289-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE RELATED CODES, ORDINANCES,
MASTER PLANS, GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
.- Formatted: Font color. Red
Collier County Government has enacted landscape codes,
ordinances, guidelines and standards related directly to
providing minimum requirements for landscaping within and along
County roadway corridors. See Section 8 for references and web
site locations.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN Formatted: Font cobra Red
The Master Plan was adopted on 04/22/2003 and addressed the
landscape improvements and maintenance for County four and six
lane arterial roadways as listed in the Master Plan In May of
2009 the County Commission removed funding and updated standards
for improvements, which affects the Golden Gate Beautification
MSTU Master Plan roadways, Santa Barbara Blvd.(Golden Gate Canal
to Green Blvd.) and Green Blvd. (Sunshine Blvd, to Santa Barbara
Blvd). Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan
changes are as follows:
Recommended poliev: Formatted: Font color: Red
Collier County Landscape Master Plan requires Tvpe `B" landscaping improvements on all 6 ,
lane arterials within the urbanized area budget permitting
I. If a developer /MSTU /HOA desires to landscape a 6 -lane roadway that has not been landscaped
due to budeet const7•aints and commits to improve the roadway- to County established Type "B"
landscaping standards, the
developer/MSTU/HOA may do so at their own cost The county would assume the maintenance
responsibilities subject to Board approval This condition would require the County to evaluate
its ability to fund ongoing
maintenance and. as such. final Board approval will be required for each request
2. If a developer /MSTU/HOA desires to landscape a 4-lane highway depicted in Attachment A
which is either at its anticipated maximum lane configuration with no future plans for expansion
or expansion is beyond the 5 -Year Capital Impact Element (CIE) and commits to improve the
roadway to County established Type `B" lapdscaning standards the developer /MSTU /HOA may
do so at their own cost. If future 6- laning is identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP), any landscaping must be installed in a manner not to conflict with the future expansion
The county would assume the maintenance responsibilities subiect to Board approval This
condition would require the County to evaluate its abilitv to fund ongoing maintenance and as
such, final Board avvroval will be required for each request
3. If a developer /MSTUMOA Nvishes to improve County landscapiM� level through the installation
of street trees (Type C -l) or through the installation of a buffer (Type C-2), the
developer /MSTUHOA would pay 100% of the additional plant material and irrigation
improvements and be required to maintain the improvements since it exceeds the current
approved levels of a Type B. This condition would require that the interested party enter
3 -29 03/1997
01/2009
03 /C
Packet Page -1291-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
into a landscape maintenance agreement with Collier County. The request and the landscape wrn�attad: FoMcoior. Red
maintenance agreement would require Board approval for each request.
The northern portion Santa Barbara Blvd. north of the Golden Gate
Canal to the end of the existing curbed medians is ready for
landscape improvements if they comply with the Collier County
Landscape Beautification Master Plan changes. The Golden Gate
MSTU could develop a project to provide the landscape
improvements for this section of Santa Barbara Blvd. (Appron.
4,270 ln. ft., 8- medians with 73,669 sq. ft. of green area). The
remainder of Santa Barbara Blvd. north from the current existing
improved medians to Green Blvd. the northern boundary of the
Golden Gate MSTU district, could be considered for median
landscape improvements at a time following_ the future roadway
widening and improvements are installed.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 2.03.07 Corridor Management Overlay District
This Division affects the Golden Gate Parkway, West roadway
corridor. The minimum requirements call for a 25 foot wide buffer
area adjacent to the road right -of -way that retains 85 percent of
the existing native vegetation. The trees planted shall be
indigenous native species 8 foot in height and 30 feet on center.
These requirements apply to all zoning uses except for single
family homes in the Estates District.
Chapter 4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office
Commercial Overlay District (GGPPOCO)
Special Conditions for the Properties Abutting Golden Gate
Parkway East of Santa Barbara Boulevard as Referenced in the
Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District Map
(Map 2) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan.
Landscaping
1. Projects shall provide a ten (10) foot buffer between
vehicular right -of -way and required sidewalk and shall
provide landscaping of one (1) shade tree per thirty (30)
linear feet. Such trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet
in height and one and one -half (1�) inches in diameter at
the time of planting that shall have a minimum canopy of
fifteen (15) feet at maturity. In addition, a hedge or berm
planting combination shall be planted along the entire
length of this ten (10) foot buffer consistent with section
4.06.00.
2. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the gross vehicular use
area shall be landscaped to provide visual relief. One (1)
tree, as described in section 4.02.26 I.1., shall be
provided for each seventy -five (75) square feet of this
3 -25 03/1997
01/2009
03/ 2 0 1- r= m 2
Packet Page -1292-
landscaped area. This landscaping shall be placed within the
vehicular use area.
Chapter 4.06, Landscaping, Buffering and Vegetation Retention
Chapter 4.06, Landscaping, Buffering and Vegetation Retention
All commercial and multi - family projects abutting a roadway
corridor must comply with the most current landscaping and
buffering requirements.r " eeffEReEeial and '} fam:,-
-but adii . ee} - ;i�Rr- k4. Ii €ght e€ belay wr dtihS 5f 99 feet
1'
e3e9 -is ize ff 34:red te- 3= nt-al' a 19 feet- bv}ejt-h bu € €eE, and
feet er- gLceater shall
the
De e 8f 18 ,a,e e and dev lepments leeated bdi cl3ri9
eE shall— pEe--zide a 29 feet wiele btu €eia Tree-
fRk--st be planteEl ;G The fee s•i`
hl3° €e Ks =
— EeIttifefFt f t wi-s 59- peEeent 8 €eet iii hey g'it
an6 SG s planting In edditaen to th-
5f way, a 24 ineh height- ... !e --eEi ---ew h Eige Fft�is,-
�Rscalled to sef -eeR tihe a Fea.
Collier County Streetscape Master Plan
The Master plan addresses three arterial /collector roadways that
pass through the M.S.T.U. District. The roadways are C.R. 951
(undefined specific locations between S.R.84 and Golden Gate
Parkway), Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd. The Master
plan addresses all three roadways in a conceptual design manner,
but only list C.R. 951 in its 5 or 15 year Streetscape
Improvement Program.
Chapter 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Guidelines
and Standards for Commercial Buildings and Projects, Landscaping.
The Land Development Code provides for additional buffer area
widths adjacent to roadways, increase in tree heights to 12 -14
feet and natural shaping of water retention areas with additional
landscaping and features adjacent to the roadways.
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
This section of the Collier County Growth Management Plan has
landscape requirements related to roadway buffering in two of the
listed land use zoning categories. The "Golden Gate Professional
Office Commercial District" calls for a 10 foot wide buffer with
8 foot height trees 30 feet on center and a combination of a
hedge or berm along the entire length of the property adjacent to
the right -of -way. This District covers properties along Golden
Gate Parkway, East from Santa Barbara Boulevard, North to just
3 -26 03/1997
01/2009
Packet Page -1293-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
south of 50th Street SW.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
The second category is the "Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood
Centers" which calls for a 25 foot wide buffer between the
abutting right -of -way and the off - street parking area. This
category only applies on the western corners of the intersection
of C.R. 951, North and Pine Ridge Road Extension, East.
Public Rights -of -Way Construction Standards
Ordinance 93 -64
This ordinance specifies roadway construction standards and
contains guidelines for roadway landscaping and irrigation. The
ordinances list requirements for all County arterial and
collector roadways. The requirements cover plant setbacks,
heights, size, types and clear sight distances. Sidewalk and bike
path construction standards, including curb access with
physically handicapped or impaired ramps are also specified
within this ordinance. The ordinance also establishes the
permitting procedure and requirements for installing landscaping
within a road right -of -way.
Summary and Recommendations for County Codes
Based upon a review of the Land Development Code guidelines and
standards it is apparent there exist some inconsistent and
overlapping buffering and tree height requirements. It would be
recommended that Chapter 4.06 and Chapter 2.03.07 requirements be
combined so to provide for a 25 foot wide buffer with 12 -14 foot
height trees planted 30 foot on center be applied to adjacent
properties along most of the area roadways within the Golden Gate
Community Master Plan project area.
Developments along Golden Gate Parkway, East and C.R. 951, North
to Green Boulevard be exempted from the 25 foot buffer
requirement due to the large amount of existing development. The
existing Land Development Code Chapters 4.06 and 5.05.08
requirements will apply to these areas. The C.R. 951, Collier
Blvd corridor from Davis Blvd. northward is currently under
planning for improvement to a six lane roadway.
The County landscape buffer requirements in place presently
ensure for a landscape buffer area ranging from 10 to 25 feet in
width be retained or created along the roadway of commercial or
multi - family developed adjacent properties.
All the roadway corridor right -of -way easements within the
project study area range in width from 106 to 130 feet. Based
upon this the minimum landscape buffer width on adjacent
3 -27 03/1997
01/2009
Packet Page -1294-
1001\
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
properties throughout the project study area would be 15 feet.
As stated in the Collier County Streetscape Master plan
methodology, out -lying communities with their own landscape
programs are not included. It would be best to continue this
exclusion and proceed with the existing M.S.T.U. District
program. The exception to this exclusion is that the
Beautification Advisory Committee, as well as the Golden Gate
Community should public petition annually the Board of County
Commissioners to have all the Golden Gate Community roadways
added to the 5 and 15 year Collier County Streetscape Master Plan .
improvement programs to provide funding of roadway landscape
improvements.
The existing County Land Development Code provides for penalties
and fines for property owners who do not maintain the Code
required landscape buffer plantings. A review of the roadways
within the project study area revealed that 50 percent or more of
the developed properties required to install and maintain County
Code landscape buffer plantings were not present or in a healthy
condition as called for by the Codes. Due to the amount of work
and limited personnel the County Code Enforcement Division has
not been able to bring the problem under control and additional
help is needed. It would be suggested that the Beautification
Advisory Committee assist in this effort and write letters to the
property owners in violation of the Codes and inform them of the
Community beautification efforts, as well as offer assistance in
the form of direction, knowledge or expertise.
The M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee on a continuous basis should
monitor and be ed to provide
binding pre-,pnroval reviews of the "Land Development Code" (LDC)
Site Development Plan (SDP) submittals for projects located alon
the arterial and collector roadways within the M.S.T.U. district
These types of reviews have occurred. In the -tst
and can result in the development of a private /public partnership
for roadway beautification. There will be no obligation for Land
Development Services to withhold ap2ro - -a1 of an SDP with or
without the a.pp.ro:-al from the MSTU Commit *Pa
Existing Pedestrian and Roadway Lighting
Pedestrian scale accent or safety lighting was virtually none
existent prior to the implementation of this Master plan.
Presently Tropicana Blvd. and Sunshine Blvd. have the pedestrian
accent lighting installed on the median ends. The pedestrian
accent lighting fixtures provide additional lighting for
pedestrians and vehicles. The internal collector roadways of
Coronado Parkway, Green Blvd., Hunter Blvd., Sunshine Blvd., and
Tropicana Blvd. are not properly lit per the F.D.O.T. State
standard of providing a 1.3 average foot candle level of light
3 -28 03/1997
01/2009
0201 �=�
Packet Page -1295-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
along the roadway.
These roadways only have streetlight twin fixtures within the medians
located at intersecting roads. The light levels at these locations
appear to meet the state standard. The only roadway that appears to
have the proper light levels is C.R. 951, South, Part "B" from Golden
Gate Parkway, East to Green Blvd.
Existing Pedestrian Walkways and Bike Pathways
C.R. 951, South, Part "B ", Green Blvd., Golden Gate Parkway,
Sunshine Blvd., Coronado Pkwy. and Tropicana Blvd. have asphalt
and /or concrete, off -road and in -road shared facilities.
Community Gateway and Entry Roadway Signage
Existing Community Entry Signage
Located at the west end of the Golden Gate Parkway, East roadway
is a Community entry signs that were part of the Golden Gate
Parkway Beautification project. These signs were paid for and
donated to the Beautification M.S.T.0 by local organizations.
This type of public / private partnership should be encouraged
for future signs. It would be recommended to adopt this existing
sign format as the Community wide entry or boundary signage and
incorporate these types of signs into other roadway
beautification projects (See Figure 12).
Existing Roadway Traffic Control Signage
The Community roadway traffic signage is standard type painted
metal signs mounted on galvanized poles or 4" x 4' wood posts.
These signs include the stop signs, road name signs, speed limit
signs and general traffic directional signs. This type of signage
provides for no coherency or coordination to the community image.
Roadway Beautification Attitude Survey
A Golden Gate Community wide attitude survey about roadway
beautification was developed and distributed to the community
residents. A total of 34 responses were returned. The survey was
an attempt to involve the community into the planning process.
Even with the low number of responses the survey results provided
information the Advisory Committee felt was important in their
decision making process.
3 -29 03/1997
01/2009
03 %20 ==
Packet Page -1296-
n
0
p
N•
rt
hh
ct
h
i
w
0
0
Pi
a
En
H.
w
a
w
c�
n
N
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 4
TYPICAL BEAUTIFICATION PLAN CONCEPTS FOR ROADWAYS
The Advisory Committee during its public meetings decided
earlier on that the Master Plan efforts would be directed to
roadways located within the Beautification M.S.T.U. boundaries
due to funding concerns. The other community roadways outside
the M.S.T.U. as listed in the plan will be addressed in a
written conceptual form. The Committee realized roadways outside
of the District are important because of their inter Community
connection as feeder roads to the Beautification M.S.T.U.
District. Implementation of the following landscape concepts on
uncurbed roadways will require approval from the Collier County
Transportation Services Director.
The proposed landscape plan concepts were developed to provide
for the most flexible means in which to perform roadway
landscape beautification in regard to budgeting and phasing.
These beautification landscape plan concepts were also developed
in order to try and solve two major concerns associated with
roadway landscape improvements. The first major concern is the
County's requirement to install curbing around the median before
landscaping is installed. The curbing serves two purposes. One
is to act as a barrier to protect the plant material and
irrigation sprinkler heads and the other is to stop undesignated
median crossovers by motorists. The second major concern with
the curbing is the cost of installation. Curbing costs are
typically greater than 50 percent of the total cost of roadway
landscape improvements. In an attempt to address these major
concerns, an undulating berm and retention area grading concept
was developed. This grading concept would physically attempt to
deter motorists from crossing the medians. The grading in
conjunction with the plant material would visually deter the
motorist to stay away and off the medians. This concept also
provides an additional visual relief from the flat horizontal
medians that exist throughout the Golden Gate Community
roadways. The finished grade and plant placement on uncurbed
medians must take into account the future installation of
curbing as funds permit. Uncurbed medians with a width 14 feet
or less will require an approval for canopy trees or palms to be
place in the center of the medians.
The concept of planting trees along the side of the roads
without outside curbed lanes can only occur if a special
exception is granted by the Transportation Services Director per
4 -1 03/1997
Packet Page -1298-
Ordinance 93 -64. This is because of the set speed limit on the
roadways is over 30 MPH requiring a minimum tree setback along
the right -of ways of 25 foot from the edge of pavement. If the
trees were planted to this setback the trees would be on or
beyond the right -of -way lines. All of the roadways within the
M.S.T.U., except for Collier Blvd. (C.R.951), both the north and
south sections, have no curbing on the outside lanes.
The uncurbed median concepts are based on the medians not being
irrigated or irrigated by a tanker.
Proper tree selection for tree plantings along or within the
rights -of -way should be guided by Florida Power & Light's "Plant
the RIGHT TREE in the RIGTH PLACE" south Florida edition.
UNCUR13ED 14 FEET OR WIDER AND CURBED 20 FEET OR WIDER
MEDIANS
Typically most of the uncurbed median within the Master Plan
roadways are 18 feet or greater in width, except at the turn
lane locations. Curbed medians typically range from 15 to 38
( + / -) feet wide. Curbed medians wider than 20 feet have four
inch height mountable type curb and medians under 20 feet have
six inch height vertical face curbs. Proposed future curbing
installed on medians 20 feet or less in width should be six inch
vertical face F.D.O.T. Type "D" or Type "F" curb depending on
the road drainage pattern.
Any of the following proposed typical type landscape planting
plan concepts can also be implemented on roadways with existing
curb around the medians and /or along the outside travel lanes.
Type T1 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference drawing T1)
Type T1 is a median only installation of canopy trees or palms
installed on a typical 50 foot center with shrubs beds planted
at the base of the trees. The trees are to be placed in the
grade transition area between the berm and retention area to
help prevent motorist from crossing the median at location other
than designated median openings. The Type Tl concept is
basically considered a roadway median tree planting program.
Type T2 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference drawing T2)
Type T2 is a combination of Type T1 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
4 -2
Packet Page -1299-
03/1997
0 -/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs. This Type T2
concept is an entire roadway tree planting program.
Type T3 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference drawing T3)_
Type T3 is a median only planting plan. It utilizes low growing
ground covers or turf on top of the berms and at the median ends
medium height shrubs within the retention areas. The plant
material located within the retention or low areas should be
wetland or water tolerant type plants and the plants on top of
the berms should be upland or more drought tolerant.
Type T4 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference drawing T4)
Type T4 is a combination of Type T3 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs.
CURBED MEDIANS 8 TO 20 FOOT WIDTH
The following landscape concepts are not cost effective in
medians wider than 20 feet and should be only implemented in the
center of the medians on roads expected to receive additional
traffic lanes.
Type T5 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference drawing T5)
Type T5 is a median only planting with no turf areas.
Type T6 (Reference drawing T6)
Type T6 is a combination of Type T5 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs.
CURBED 8 TO 6 FOOT OR LESS MEDIANS OR SEPARATORS
4 -3
Packet Page -1300-
03/1997
2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Curbed medians 8 to 6 feet or less in width or typically medians
at turn lane locations should be paved with decorative
interlocking pavers. This would also include the existing solid
concrete separator medians at turn lane locations.
UNCURBED ROADS: IN -ROAD PATHWAYS FACILITY CONCEPTS
In an attempt to reduce the overall landscape installation and
maintenance cost, as well as improve pedestrian /bicycle pathway
facilities, the following two in -road pathway concepts are
recommended. The first concept is the "Four lane road in -road
Facility" concept requiring a two foot wide strip of pavement be
added to the inside lanes reducing the median width to 14 foot
( + / -). The road pavement would then be restriped to provide for
two 10 foot traffic lanes and a 4.5 foot wide in -road pathway
facility on each side (See Figure 13). The second concept is a
"Two lane road in -road Facility" concept requiring the road to
be restriped to one 14 foot traffic lane and one 8 foot wide in-
road pathway facilities on each side (See Figure 14). With both
these concepts an additional pedestrian path on one side of the
roadway would be recommended to provide for the safest
pedestrian circulation. The overall maintenance of these
facilities as listed above should be less from both a repair and
landscape cost point of view.
The following M.S.T.U. internal collector roadways would be
recommended for the "Two lane road in -road Facility" concept:
Roadway Name
Hunter Boulevard
Sunshine Boulevard
Tropicana Boulevard
and the following County major arterial roadways for the "Four
lane road in -road Facility" concept:
Coronado Parkway
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
RECOMMENDED BEAUTIFICATION CONCEPTS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U.
ARTERIAL /COLLECTOR ROADWAYS
1. Coronado Parkway
Landscape: Type T1 or T5
4 -4
Packet Page -1301-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
Type T1, T5 or T6, Type T5 Completed
pedestrian crossings. Install twin headed
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
decorative streetlight fixture within the
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
medians on 200( + / -) foot centers.
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
roadway spaced triangularly on 200(+ / -) foot
control signs.
Pathways:
Four lane road in -road Facility concept
Install a Community "Welcome to Golden Gate"
along with existing 5 foot wide off -road
entry sign in the west right -of -way area
facilities located along the south and north
just north of the Golden Gate Canal bridge.
rights -of -way (See Figure 13).
2. Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), South
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway)
Landscape:
Type T1, T5 or T6, Type T5 Completed
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200(+ / -) foot
centers.
Signage:
Install a Community "Welcome to Golden Gate"
entry sign in the west right -of -way area
just north of the Golden Gate Canal bridge.
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. Completed
Pathways:
8 foot wide off -road facility along west
right -of -way area.
Part "B" (Golden Gate Parkway to Green Boulevard)
Landscape: Type T1, T3 or T9,
Type T3 /T5 combined, Completed
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings and replace existing
streetlight fixtures with decorative poles
and fixtures.
Signage: Install a Community "Welcome to Golden Gate"
entry sign on the N.W. corner of Green Blvd.
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. Completed
Pathways: Existing facility
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
Landscape: Existing, Type T3 /T5 combined, Completed
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200 foot( + / -)
4 -5 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1302-
MR
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Landscape: Type T1, T5 or T6
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200( + / -) foot
centers.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
4 -6
Packet Page -1303-
03/1997
03 %2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
centers
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. Community "Welcome to Golden
Gate" entry sign on west end. Completed
Pathways:
Install an off -road 5 foot wide facility
along the south right -of -way area to make a
continuous connection along the roadway.
Project Completed.^_= mr'_ = =__"
4. Green Boulevard
Landscape:
Type T1 or T6 on the eastern four lane
section and continue the side right -of -way
areas trees along the western two lane
section.
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
streetlight fixtures within the medians on
the eastern half and along the southern edge
of pavement on the western half spaced
200( + / -) foot on center.
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways:
Existing facility
5. Hunter Boulevard
Landscape:
Type T1 or T5
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures as specified in the Master Plan
within the medians spaced 200( + / -) foot on
center.
Signage:
Install decorative street name.and traffic
control signs.
Pathways:
Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with a 5 foot wide pedestrian facility along
the southwestern right -of -way.
(See Figure 14). Project Completed.Gample -te
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Landscape: Type T1, T5 or T6
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200( + / -) foot
centers.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
4 -6
Packet Page -1303-
03/1997
03 %2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12113/2011 Item 16.A.17.
W
control signs.
Pathways: Install a 5 foot wide off -road facility
along both sides of the roadway.
7. Sunshine Boulevard
Landscape: Type T1 or T5, Type T3 /T5
combined, Project Completed.
Type T3,45 ee- mbined, G sea
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or,
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures within the medians spaced 200( + / -)
foot on center. Pedestrian fixtures at r wrmatted: Font: Not Bold, Nounderline
median ends completed.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways: Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with existing off -road pedestrian facility
along the east right -of -way (See Figure 14).
B. Tropicana Boulevard
Landscape: Type T1 or T5,Type T3 /T5
combined, Project Completed.
Type — T3/T5— eembined, 6eMPle�ed
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures within the medians spaced 200( + / -)
foot on center. Pedestrian_ fixtures
a_t _ _ _ Formatted :F.r: Not Bold, Nounderiine
median ends completed.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways: Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with existing off -road pedestrian facility
along the west right -of -way (See Figure 14).
Project Completed.ed
Summary
The Beautification M.S.T.U. District roadways numbers one
through eight landscape concepts were selected based on low
annual landscape maintenance cost. The selection will provide,
upon completion of the landscape improvements, the estimated
lowest annual total landscape maintenance costs. The Type T1 and
T5 landscape planting concepts will require the least annual
landscape maintenance costs.
4 -7 03/1997
v3i2011
Packet Page -1304-
9 -8
Packet Page -1305-
03/1997
03:2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
•
•
•
•
•
i
25
i1
H
Z
W
x
W
0
Q
W
A
Q
O
�D
O
M /?1
M/8
it
W
A
J
Q
M A W
H
y
ad �
�c- W 0
I J
Q
to 3
I �
d Z
>- W
~ W
N Q
N a
M H
Q
> H
N W�j
F-
H
F-
~ W
N
N N
IA W
A
M A
M 2 W y
oc
y N
eii Q
Wl7
J
3
H
M /21
I J
Y
W Z
M0.
3
W
acZ
r
Aw
A
MJ
CL
°ma¢
F-Do
y d W
Z
XXW
a ¢ a
W � �
P
N
W Q
p W
J
WZZ
MN
o °X
aw
cW
a>
Ce- aQ
CL Q n.
I
M
�
F-
Z
W
x
W
N
W
A
0
W
�0
O
M/S
N
N
03 W
J �
3s
y y
M
.-I
N
W
W
N J
F-
4
W
U �'I
p
>-
y O �
F- W
MJ
CL
°ma¢
oo�
N
MCL
* Q
a ¢ a
d• A
w¢
Qom¢
w
OLD
CL W
NH�
�H
M
NRI
yaW
� J
M
�
4,
XWW
CU
Y
U
�-+
L� W
W N 0-
~QJ
M/S
N
N
03 W
J �
3s
y y
M
.-I
N
W
W
.r Q J
F-
4
U �'I
L.W
OC °QJ
N
* Q
d• A
ao \
N
lD
M
I
W
Q
� J
M
�
4,
CU
Y
U
�-+
L� W
u
U
m
a-
~QJ
F-
as W
A
Ld
p
(4 N ��
,*�\
i
A'
s
Q Y
Z J
p p Q
ca �
Z p
Q Z Q
..
LO c � W 0!
to H
N d W
,pA
X W W
W C.L d
J
Q Y
Z J
p O Q
\I-3
z CL
Z p Z
Q Q
w rr
rZ-� N F-
� C3 "
�oA
xQ�w
wIL a
M 7d
q
Q
0
J
Q U
W Q
N W
O
d W
p Y
Q'.
0- P�1
A
a
Cl
I
Z
�r J_
C7 U
W Q
N W
O
d W
0
C�
IL PQ
M/d
A
W
V)
to
Q
m
�w
a
W J
J :)
Q p
3=
ao ~
Q
U
L�
W W
QZ
(Y-Q
�- J
IL
}
f- 0
ZZ
t � q
X w
o W
I
U
L�
W W
Q Z
R Q
F- J
d'
.-r
2
OJ ~
Q
rL
in
�w
A
W ,J
J
Q O
3=
C,) N
i•
•
•
•
v
w
I
0
M
ri
O1
00
m
CL
N
U
m
CL
Section 5
ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION
PLAN ELEMENTS AND DESIGN STANDARDS
The goal of these plan elements and design standards is to
provide for a feasible, economical, safe, more pedestrian
friendly and aesthetically pleasing roadway system for the
residents and motorists. These elements and standards are to be
guides for preparing the final design and installation plans.
The Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee and the Collier
County Government will need to continue in their public /private
partnership in the planning, funding, design and maintenance of
future M.S.T.U. roadway beautification projects. It is
recommended that in the final design phase of future projects
that a Florida Registered Landscape Architect be involved in the
process.
The following will be a list of items to be considered and /or
incorporated into final design plans:
Community colors
The community colors are to be forest green and cream. The forest
green is to be equivalent to Tiger Drylac® powder coating color
Ral 6016 and the cream equivalent to Sherman Williams exterior
Gentry cream SW2332. The community colors are to be utilized
singularly or in combination on site furnishing and fixtures such
as benches, traffic control signage and decorative light
fixtures.
Sight Distance
For required sight distances for landscaping in medians at median
crossover locations and at roadway intersections (See F.D.O.T.
"Design Standards" Index 546). For roadways with posted 25 MPH
speeds refer to F.D.O.T. "Manual of Minimum standards for Design,
Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways" as a
reference standard.
Sight Window
For required vertical sight window area that must be kept clear
of foliage that can block a motorists view (See F.D.O.T. "Design
Standards" Index 546).
Pedestrian / Bicycle Pathway Facilities
On many of the M.S.T.U. roadways, the pathway facilities are non-
existent along both sides of the roadway or are not continuous
5 -1
Packet Page -1308-
03/1997
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
along the roadways. Refer to the Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities
Map for location of existing and proposed facilities within the
M.S.T.U. roadway corridors.
The installation of proposed pathway facilities should be
planned and be included in future roadway beautification
projects. Coordination with the Naples (Collier County)
Metropolitan Planning Organization Pathways Work Program and
Advisory Committee will provide assistance and possible funding
for pathways.
Pathways Facility Design Standards:
Due to the large amount of lineal feet and overall lack of
facilities within the M.S.T.U. roadways it is recommended to use
concrete facilities. The implementation of the In -road Pathways
Pavement Concepts" would shorten the time frame of installation.
Installation should be incorporated, budgeted and scheduled with
Collier County road resurfacing plans and schedules.
The minimum width of a concrete one way pedestrian /bicycle
facility should be 5 feet. The minimum width of a two way
concrete facility should be 8 feet.
Pedestrian Crosswalk Marking
Pedestrian crosswalk locations should be marked. Refer to the
"Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways" current edition for crosswalk markings. Crosswalk
markings with longitudinal lines is recommended for added
visibility. Surface applied reflective white brick pattern
surfacing should be considered as an alternate to painted white
bars. Sidewalk curb ramps at all streets or large commercial
driveways crossings shall have embedded domed warning surfaces
per F.D.O.T. "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards" Indexes.
Warning surfaces shall be a contrasting earth tone (i.e. clay
brick) color to the paved surface.
Curbing
Median curbing shall be concrete (6) six inch vertical face Type
"F" or "D" curb per F.D.O.T "Roadway and Traffic Design
Standards" Index #300, most current edition.
Decorative Paving
Medians 6 feet or under in width, concrete separators, and
medians adjacent to turn lane stack areas shall be paved with
decorative concrete interlocking pavers (See Figure 16).
The paver pattern shall simulate a cobblestone pattern made up of
5 -2 03/1997
03 /20i 19i
Packet Page -1309-
a mix of three different paver sizes and colors. The colors shall
be dark emerald green, medium green and cream. The percentage
ratio for each paver color shall be one third. Existing
installations should be reviewed in order to match colors. T4+e
paveEs shall be equivalent te— Kr- ehling- industftos, ire -'s
Kebblestese -- eElee'__.._ pavers eene4:stlng of in 1,13 DaEk emefal
#89, 1,13 Green #W9 and -1,13 Ci=effte 1! #66 -- -rr -- ed equal.
Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting
Roadway: There shall be two types of roadway /street lighting
recommended for the M.S.T.U.
Golden Gate Master Plan `Special Overlay District"
Pole & Fixture: Collier County Traffic Operations
"East Trail Street Light Assembly"
( Lumec 250 watt metal halide, DMS30
LMS11684A, Type A), Drawing No. CCTO 03 -204
M.S.T.U. Roadways
Pole: Green toned exposed aggregate round pole anchor based
or embedded, topped with a single or double 6 foot
fixture arm, color forest Green.
Fixture: Lumec Helios series H.B.M., forest green Color, or
approved equal.
F.D.O.T. minimum average light levels of 1.5 initial foot candles
along the road shall be maintained.
The pedestrian lighting shall be a decorative pedestrian scaled
pole and fixture. The color shall be one or a combination of the
community colors. These fixtures are to be located at major
intersection corners, median ends and pedestrian crosswalks.
These fixtures are to provide daytime accent and additional night
time safety lighting.
Decorative Pedestrian Accent Lighting
Pole: Lumec, Inc. AM6U- 16- GN6 -TX 16 foot ht. pole with base
cover or approved equal.
Arm: VR 302 -1A- GN6 -TX
Fixture: Lumec, Inc #175SMH- DMS50- SG3- LD- QTA240 or approved
equal.
Soil Analysis and Preparation
Prior to planning and design of any future projects it is
recommended that test borings be performed in the road medians.
5 -3
Packet Page -1310-
03/1997
C3/20119_.. .__
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
The existing soil within the medians shall be removed to a depth
of 8 to 12 inches minimum; or to a depth to remove any limestone
or construction debris. The areas shall then be filled with a
specified soil mix or with a local clean sandy loam top soil. The
ph level of the soil should be within the ranges of 5.5 to 6.8.
If local top soils are used or existing soil is to be amended, it
is recommended that 25 to 50 percent by volume of sewage sludge
be incorporated into the soil. The Collier County Wastewater
Treatment Facilities produce, and can provide, the sewage sludge.
Water management polymers and wetting agents should be
incorporated in the soil per Manufacturers specifications.
Site Furnishings and Fixtures
Benches: Wausau Tile- Model TF5047 with cream
weatherstone concrete supports and forest
green colored recycled plastic seats and
backing or approved equal.
Trash receptacles: Wausau Tile- precast Model A, TF1205, cream
weatherstone finish with forest green plastic
arch lid or approved equal.
Bike Rack: Six cycle tubular loop rack with in- ground
mount. The color shall be forest green.
Street Identity and Traffic Control Signa e
Typical existing standard metal roadway street name or traffic
control signs shall be mounted on a wood backing and then framed
and mounted on a decorative post system. The posts and frames
shall be cream colored and the bands and sign backing or
highlighted objects shall be forest green. The support posts for
all stop signs, large traffic control or informational and street
identity signs or combination of shall be a 6" x 6" square post
(See Figure 15).
Landscape Sight Distance and Sight Windows
The landscape plantings must comply with the sight distance and
sight window details (See Figures 18A and 18B). These details
graphically depict the clear sight requirements as set forth in
1997 edition of Collier County Ordinance 93 -64 and the
"Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public
Right -of -Way" and as detailed in this plan. The details establish
minimum tree setbacks, clear sight zones, and plant and canopy
height requirements. Limit of clear sight zones shall be
increased or adjusted at horizontal curve locations so to provide
for the greatest clear sight zone possible.
5 -4
110�
Packet Page -1311-
03/1997
3; 2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Major Intersections
Special landscape improvements should be implemented at major
intersections in order to establish a pronounced entry into the
Community. Major intersections would be defined as signalized or
un- signalized intersections where two major County arterial
roadways intersect.
The intersections within the M.S.T.U. which would be considered
major are the Golden Gate Parkway, East and Santa Barbara Blvd.,
North intersection, Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) at Green Blvd. and
Golden Gate Parkway intersection and the Santa Barbara Blvd.,
North and Green Blvd. intersection.
Major intersections should receive the following type
improvements:
1. International pedestrian crosswalk markings of solid white
bars.
2. Decorative street and pedestrian lighting fixtures.
3. Decorative street name, traffic control and Community entry
signage.
4. Decorative mast arm traffic signal control pole systems
5. Site furnishing: Benches, trash containers and bike racks.
6. Pedestrian safe areas in medians and at corners delineated
with decorative paving.
The Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd., intersection is
listed in the County approved 1988 "Corridor Management Study" as
a major intersection per the study.
LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
The intent of these landscape design standards are to provide for
the safety of motorists and pedestrians while creating a thriving
urban landscape within the M.S.T.U. roadways. The general
planting concept for all roadways will be to utilize native plant
species and naturalized accent plants to try and restore a
planting image based upon the upland pine forest vegetation
community, (Refer to Drawings T1 through T6 Appendix A) . Roadway ro.r d: Nounder�ine
streetscape improvements will be guided by the "Collier County
Landscape and Irrigation Specifications for Beautification
Improvements within the Public Right -of- way." most current
edition. A pre- design meeting and an on -site review with the
Collier County Transportation staff is recommended.
The median widths listed below refer to the inside of curbing or
planting area.
5 -5 03/1997
Packet Page -1312-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Curbed 8 to 6 feet wide or less medians /separators
These type medians shall be paved with decorative interlocking
pavers as specified and as funding permits per "Curbed Turn Lane
& Decorative Paving Detail" (See Figure 16).
Uncurbed 8 to 6 feet wide or less medians
These type medians shall be bermed per "Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm
Detail" (See Figure 17).
Curbed 20 to 8 foot wide medians
These type medians shall be landscaped with plants and /or
decorative pavers only. No turf grasses.
Uncurbed 14 feet or wider or curbed 20 feet or wider medians
These type medians will typically contain turf and shall be
landscaped per the "Typical Roadway Landscape Plans" Type T1, T2,
T3 or T4, (Refer to drawings Tl through T4 Appendix A) and
"Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm Detail ", (See Figure 17).
Existing or Proposed Curbed Roadways
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) South, Part "A"
(G.G. Canal to G.G. Pkwy.)
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T5, medians planted with
no turf.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing vertical face curb around
medians and along outside lanes.
This segment of roadway should be treated as a major entry or
gateway road into the community. The planting design should have
a mature and dramatic appearance to create an entrance.
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) South, Part "B"
(G.G. Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T3, center of medians
planted with 16' wide beds spaced
between 100 and 200 foot on center.
Unplanted median areas proposed for
future traffic or turn lanes shall be
grassed.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
5 -6 03/1997
Packet Page -1313-
Curbing: Existing mountable and vertical curb
around medians and vertical along
Outside lanes.
This segment of roadway is totally zoned and 90% developed with
roadside commercial facilities. Attention must be given in the
landscape design to address visibility for the high amount of
automobile traffic entering and exiting this roadway.
Coronado Parkway
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Type "F" vertical face 6 inch ht. curb.
Hunter Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Type "F" vertical face 6 inch ht. curb.
Sunshine Boulevard
Typical landscape plan.: Existing Type T3, medians with _plant
beds and turf.
Irritation: E_isting well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: E:.:isting vertical face 6 inch ht. curb
around median noses and turn lanes.
Tropicana Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T3, medians with plant
beds and turf.
Irrigation: Existina well & _pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing vertical face 6 inch ht. curb
around median noses and turn lanes.
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Ise -r (Coronado Pkwy. to Green Blvd., Phase II)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plants and no
5 -7
Packet Page -1314-
03/1997
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
111\
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
turf .
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Vertical face curb around entire
medians.
Decorative paving: Within turn lane stack areas and /or
separators.
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
(G.G. Canal to end of existing 6 -lane Roadway Improvements,
Phase I)
Phase 11, (Gerenade Plewy. t9 G.G.
r___..______ts
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plants and no
turf.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system. Irrigation Formatted: Font color: Red
sleeving is existing.
Curbing: Existin9.4e tieai €at 6 i
Decorative paving: WE6thin ttarn lane staek— areas -anei r
E x i s t i n a. Formatted: Font color. Red
Golden Gate Parkway East
This segment of roadway has been irrigated and landscaped. The
landscape design used was a modified Type T3 as listed above.
Continued maintenance and renovation of plant beds will be
needed.
Existing Uncurbed Roadways
Green Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing 6" ht. curb around median noses and Type "r"
vertical face 6 inch ht. curb.Gerenad
Type ea! landseape pla3 }i Type 7"3, `ReEi4mags ''tI:i play, —�aeeis 8i E#
,. c
v
i:e•E:iaR n esev a lanes.
Green Beelever
5 -8
Packet Page -1315-
03/1997
;@ a;
-1 -li and r-€.
T iee: ist-
Pep up systeffi.
urbina• E-s's`ing ae ~bear — €aee 6 ineh h4: e-rb
ar-eand mod% -eases and turn lanes.
IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
The following information evaluates the potential use and cost
effectiveness of water resources and irrigation systems that
would be available for use within the Beautification M.S.T.U.
area.
Reclaimed water transmission line systems
Two reclaimed water transmission line systems were analyzed.Twq
analygea ;See Type ndi=: 4 :1 . The systems would provide reclaimed
water for all roadways within the M.S.T.U. boundary. One system
utilized the Florida Cities Utilities Company's existing
wastewater treatment plant as the source r� �'., feic
`••e'•- "yaps) . The high estimated cost to install this system made
the implementation unfeasible. The other alternate system was a
reclaimed water transmission line system connected and supplied
from the proposed Collier County reclaimed water pipe line that
crosses` -s at the intersection of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951)
and Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. The high estimated cost for
5 -9 03/1997
C3 /2C.
Packet Page -1316-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
' \
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
installing this system made the implementation unfeasible. The
cost of both systems are unrealistic based upon present and
projected M.S.T.U. revenues.
Reclaimed water tanker applied
This method of watering would not require in place irrigation
system equipment or components. The water would be applied with a
special equipped tanker truck on medians with a width of 20 feet
or less. This type of watering method is a very successful and
cost effective system for watering landscape areas where the
potable or treated water cost is high or where a well and pump
system is not feasible such as in coastal areas. This type method
of irrigating is presently being utilized within the City of
Marco Island on its un- irrigated roadway medians. This method of
water because of its high annual operational costs would use to
much of the M.S.T.U. operational revenues at build out.anethe=
C.
Well and pump transmission line system
This study was based on installing an inter connecting well and
pump system to all roadway areas e The system
would utilize the existing wells, pumps and transmission lines
located along Golden Gate Parkway East. The estimated high cost
to implement this system with the present M.S.T.U. revenues makes
it unrealistic.
Potable / Treated water
The internal roadways of Coronado, Sunshine, and Tropicana could
be connected to the existing potable water system. The initial
connection cost would be very low, but the long term use cost per
gallon would be very high.
Conventional pop -up spray systems
The conventional irrigation system remains the most cost
effective system to install and maintain. The system shall be
designed so as not to permit or reduce to the greatest extent
possible, overspray and seeping onto the paved areas. The pop -up
systems must utilize low volume, low angle spray nozzles and
pressure reducing devices. Systems designed for medians using
pop -up mist type spray sprinklers should have the sprinklers
5 -10 03/1997
_n;- -
Packet Page -1317-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
spaced on a triangular layout verses a square layout whenever
possible. This will reduce the total number of sprinklers
required in the medians. Systems designed for medians with turf
using pop -up rotor sprinklers should be designed so the
sprinklers are spaced on a square head to head layout and
installed 18 inches off back of curbing.at t`ic baeli In
medians wider than 20 feet with a generally centerlineeen4.e=
plantings of drought tolerant plants should haveenly -a head to
head coverage along the sides of the medians and not necessarily
across the median width. The centerlineeentez median plantings of
drought tolerant plants naturally requires less water. Medians 20
feet or wider with just turf should have an additional center row
of sprinklers in order to reduce the sprinkler radius
requirements. The above pop -up sprinkler layouts combined with
utilizing drought tolerant plants provides for water coverage
while minimizing the chance of overspray and seeping. All
sprinklers within the roadways should be installed on flexible
plastic pipe off the lateral piping.
Irrigation zoning should occur based upon plant type water
requirements whenever possible. Canopy trees and palms should be
on a separate low volume drip /bubbler zone.
IRRIGATION, PLANT MATERIAL AND MAINTENANCE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Refer to the Collier County Right -of -way Ordinance "Construction \
Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Rights -of -Way" most
current edition for irrigation, plant materials and maintenance
standards and guidelines.
5 -11 03/1997
Packet Page -1318-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 15
/ra LOGO PLATE dl'. RWW-D
5UQPA4$ KMXf DE U"44 RAI E
54Q.Ek'f uArtb a12H
Cto�uf oe er4Ft,1,�� nET- L, IE:
Sif f NArt�'V=W W 54. I"'MP. Faa.NV StvEEf
PAIVA1W nSTAI. R.aIS
011W 4 -5 14 "xZ" C.ALv. A�Zt1
-- lJ a r=wf
N M
'Tip. I'Iz xti` tu=
f01HE CO LM 10
p 8B CAM" 1.
3 Z. ,SAU tvuzLU>:
.r PL.`I whop 51
U W 1
v s fDEB bRbF.tl.
gp'f}i 5t64i
3
INPo2ttaKloN o¢.
4 wo : it
u,u
`�
r z BARIP 'to uT� 4`�9" co
IH4�t �T,coLOe to
BI; Ge"44
s � �
17
2 � Z
7
O Z
-AWN
140U VITH';OLI D Q
o T 5i}IALI. tW,-
ul i4" M 36" I k1b 'Ck�
CJ �
4
N
a
Street dame & Traffic Control Signage
5 -11
Packet Page -1319-
03/1997
03/2011
2
W
UJ
a
C.-
0
w
ilea. �,
a l►
i l
H
•
Big ;81
�ofj•
Ne���
5 -12
Packet Page -1320-
(1)
d
0)
n� V
n
(CS
L
O
U
W
`6
W
L
W
U
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 16
03/1997
03/2011
o
z
LIN�
d
N
�
m
5NIV'! 3NV'1 VNV'l
d�Iy 14-A V4y N -a ny
a
dAz
;4 X
dhy y
ilea. �,
a l►
i l
H
•
Big ;81
�ofj•
Ne���
5 -12
Packet Page -1320-
(1)
d
0)
n� V
n
(CS
L
O
U
W
`6
W
L
W
U
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 16
03/1997
03/2011
Mm-blh
1A
I
4-
E
06
7
Z
QT
4-
Packet Page -1321-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 17
:z
03/1997
03/2011
E
06
cl�
Packet Page -1321-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 17
:z
03/1997
03/2011
G' 't�tP1GA L
Arm
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 18
ixx.'�sLE LUt'T1 WA1 t2E.
LUMEL-
)4,9,H-
AW
MOUN11 KCA
lfORwT cgzvrlg
AHKION WNW ,{ Se4up,►
G26WR SK?Of D E&k-fG
CPVHtD feee. AWT FOLSs
NOS*. ANC PM 02. " KpVW
'NM FOX- -, C&H 8E USES WITH
art IJ E or- C70LW -E LU"I
uurp 6=*fl wa
N
.j
J
N
R
w
hNGKCSQ E i l(
i
Street /Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures
5 -14 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1322-
,"N
1
(�
Arm
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 18
ixx.'�sLE LUt'T1 WA1 t2E.
LUMEL-
)4,9,H-
AW
MOUN11 KCA
lfORwT cgzvrlg
AHKION WNW ,{ Se4up,►
G26WR SK?Of D E&k-fG
CPVHtD feee. AWT FOLSs
NOS*. ANC PM 02. " KpVW
'NM FOX- -, C&H 8E USES WITH
art IJ E or- C70LW -E LU"I
uurp 6=*fl wa
N
.j
J
N
R
w
hNGKCSQ E i l(
i
Street /Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures
5 -14 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1322-
,"N
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
f Figure 1$A
CL A y 1(614 -f 76N6
�sI<tlm
1
tarc��t o�c�a�25�raxT zox� -�,. �'
Yz »Et�tau
� � wttrnt
,t wtDtH
I 2�� 6AG�Of C(JRE OR pAV6t�`f`if EDGE
rn�. LlttiT of Cu-A Z Std wf Zo�t�
-t T ADAS W>*W 51(x trunNmw
Zit 'i6AC.K DiKAiL W1fi4u4 ut'tlf orw%ir.
GLF.�4t2 5t(aN"C ZONE 41Ga11'(7.U1.1E �PPL1L5.
''tYplf�L h�ni�N •aov��. �SICaFi'f Cil�'(A1`lG�
f r.$ is
c uMli 0? U.F,AE. 51GIt'f ZONE
is %P SAQ i12A%�t{ MKS,
AUA5 Wtta $1G,u'f trnWt�x+J
V VV4L wl-fH N Urlt'f of -CA
St4utzc».t� XPPU�S.
PES'Alt_� y
UniT or- tt -PA?. Sl( ZONe
FD',%p w--n- v Virg )
4.5
1 155'
Si4N C Df<lia to 17 Y1'.
17
p
P
t11WiH4+H
zoo
0
50
vcstkABt.�
�tJO
pOQ
�o
M-fAi L PoF, HUI4 LANS D1 VlVEr7 ZOAPWA`f
N. If. `r.
5 -15
Packet Page -1323-
03/1997
03/2011
B'ruu. WISH No wcg
3u,H-f W W6 17A'(UM
4 Vlp...
In
ITP ur;t of rtz,6,
PA�t%su -f P1f115htEG LiZAVrz
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 18B
BoT'fotl UtIll
G' MIN.
514.tN-,tau M
AMC- ACPA
Fstls wf
N
Sight Window Detail within dear Sight Zone
Xfom unit
CI.�i?Pi bra
lv` -45 n.P.x. oR
30' - 45 r1P.H. o►z Gti2�'f� c��f Ex
2 Aomxx.ue ry.
tt.P.Vt. o2 t. sri 4 °t�tA.'{Pw1 w
oict�a�a4r.+e
C+-fOF LaMl-f or- PtANty
to
t`'twtS o� 7 yQ.av� PAV6MaN`f
Typical Sight Window Detail
5 -16
Packet Page -1324-
03/1997
03/2011
ll—\
we
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 6
BEAUTIFICATION IMPROVEMENT COSTS AND CONSIDERATIONS
The cost information utilized in these estimates are based upon
Collier County Government and F.D.O.T. statewide average bids
and existing contract pricing related to roadway landscape,
curbing, irrigation and lighting improvements.
Planting cost
The plant material costs were based upon the following sizes:
Canopy trees:
101-
12' ht.,
2.5" cal., 501o.c.
Accent trees:
8'
-10' ht., 30
gal. or B & B
Cabbage palms:
101-
15' ht. clear
or booted trunks
Large shrubs:
10
gal. 4' -5'
ht.
Small shrubs:
3
gal. 18 " -24"
ht.
Ground covers:
1
gal. 6 " -12"
ht.
Irrigation System
The irrigation costs include an installed 100 percent coverage,
conventional pop -up system. The cost covers casing /sleeves, main
lines, wiring, valves, sprinkler heads and pump & well systems.
Design and Contract Administration fees
These fees are for professional design services and /or
consultation from a registered landscape architect and
registered engineer for lighting projects.
Site preparation
Covers the costs for vegetation removal, grading, soil removal
and /or replacement.
Concrete Curbing
Cost to install concrete curbing around entire median. Curbing
cost include minor modifications to the turn lane tapers and
median opening closures.
Decorative paving
Covers cost to install sand set concrete interlocking pavers.
Two lane road in -road pathway facility
The cost shown under this item applies to implementing the bike
facilities concept based on the "Uncurbed Collector Roadways
Development Concept" section /elevations. In -road facility cost
only includes cost of re- striping roadway.
�1 6 -1 03/1997
03/201191 ,/2999
Packet Page -1325-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Pedestrian decorative lights
Cost to install decorative pedestrian scale lighting at median
ends and at major pedestrian oriented intersections or
crossings.
Annual landscape maintenance
These costs.are based upon current contract pricing and cover
services as specified under the technical maintenance
specifications being presently implemented by Collier County
Transportation Services.
Asphalt Paving
Cost to install asphalt paving for drainage improvement, turn
lane extensions and patching purposes.
Pedestrian crosswalk markings
Cost to install surface applied high visibility pedestrian
crosswalk markings.
03/201191,'2999
6 -2
Packet Page -1326-
03/1997
n
fl M
Nu —
IM
7
N
7
v
0
CD
0
0
U)
a
CD
CD
a
0
s
CD
41
a
O
CD
0
0
M
v
CD
CT
v
Cn
CD
CL
C
O
7
41
O
CL
0
O
O
0
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
D
TOM
rV�p�D3
�- �pC)Cn
T
-01 ;00
�
:03
0-0-
��Q.�,Q.oc0
ID 0
4ai
p(n
°o
��p0
O
0 7
I '
Vii < ' uOi v " M r � -O, �
-1
�
� '
�I cam'
-� gyp'
— a 0. o
*
D
O
o o
20 :1 =,. (o
CD
rn �
0 r.
3 I
CD
v
U `<
l<
v1
C
T �D
O C-1
C7 ��
O
O Q
o
41 (D 41
r*O
• C
N
�
O« %
fD
_
41 0 (Q
O O < O
N 15
3
M.
0
N cQ �D
-Io
3
am
a) 0
(n CL
Co
oN
c
41 yD
0
vo
im°\-
—
cc 4wi
to r
w - �
v m a
v
41
0 -
a N
(n
'00
m-
I
4J
�D
(Q
7c a
0
._+
41
N
W
D
�
O .<
cn
�' � 0
n
m
u1 vi
_"
v
C
�'
M •
a o D
CD
CD
•,
N p
cln
c° d
a
n
� 4
m
a 1�
cs,
NQNn
cn
z—
On ((70
0
n
w
=
W
v
CN)1
O
Oo
'OD Q.00
z_ O
C n
Qzo-C C -
?
N
Q.
fD
(3,O
o
0
Wo WcD
0I oarno
(D CL a
n m
m CL C)
CL0 m 0_.
4
w
90
r
mac° a.
� =.
°o
°o
C a
o
a
-
—
o
OD
°
c
�o
m
m
-
3
- c
-
-
p
3 m'
v
C.
--�'n
0 --
m
CD
(n
v
w
(CD
CL
i
= Q C
^
'^ ' Cn .-. 2
O
(D N
m
= (D lD (�
C -1 (D
a,aapcQ
_�
0
N CO
O —
0
�.�v,o
vv_0
m
M
go
o �
CDOC�m
3
v
T
0
3
tp�� m
�x- ,•o- -0 0<
v
0 .
-0
�v10
mv, m v
— �OCD2)
CD =3 n _—
n
CD CD a<
CL cc cb cQ
w
N
-'
0 _a :3
-0
4) - ►111
CDC (D '
s
(D -.,
Cn a
U1
401 O
n =r � (Q
0 41 <
O
V1 -� Q
< = m 6 9
u1
v
CD O
CD Cn p
v
< N
cn
U) N (OD
O
Packet Page -1327-
X
O
9
O
z
Cn
X
H
N
N
N
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
�w
z0
30
61 0
I O
W 7
C /1
n
O
7
n
O
O
Packet Page -1328-
iv
z -,
0
_. O
� c
0 O
CL Qm
a�
0
�a
0
� o
�3
w
c
O
v
Li
Cr
N
Q
O
�
F
Q
61 0
I O
W 7
C /1
n
O
7
n
O
O
Packet Page -1328-
llo�
\
�
\
/
�.
CD
&w "-
wKKM
ggqk
i
cc 5'
0 ƒ2
7 =�£
CL
E EE0 CL
3 -0
5'8 3
m <.a-0
C�_cn
k�0E
.J7 B'
3 c2
CD CL
0� k %
�0 (D
m " 3' $
2.D M cL
C o
�Cn -0 Cr
CL M.
A
CDE
■ M 0 CL
w o k 9
0g_m
g _. § CL
%]2
0
§
2.0 CL
C CJ
7a@
c _
CD
�
C
�
C'
-0
k
\
0
C
CL
CD
0
k
$
3
)
_0 X -0 X
m 0 @ 0
CL ■ CL ■
CD a m CL
:3 CL : _
0. CD
)
)
E
0
k <0
CD 2 R 2
CD —
::r @ m ■
g _ ..
=
/
�
¥ww�
c@Wc
ocO0
0
�
qƒ?ƒ
0- CL m
CD m
Ea
-a.
h 0
CD U)
CL _ -• 2
S K 2 )
R�Lfj3
�CD 07
0 n & ?.
=E
) C 7 0
SSno
0 5'-0 (D
@ 0 0 CL
0
�2C7
0
CL
0��
k §.
22CD
J � �.
& 2.
'
CD \
2 -0 0
�o
�
� q
/�
¥
0
0
3
CD
CL
�
_
Pace Page -1329
�
�
�
�
2
§
�
2
2
§
�
�
§
2
90
�
0
:3
�
0
$
]
CD
g
0
]
�
(D
ff
f
�
�
CL
■
g
■
�
�
12/13/2011 I m 16.A.17.
00
CL CL
2
D
jccM
X20
fu
�CD* r
�. 0
S ƒo
Cn ƒCL
2 ■
C
occ
¢ M
cc -0
kl¢
fu
��M
■
§. Co
/ ƒ�
=3 m
j -4
q
§
-4
0
E
�
MM
kk
w
CoD
q
VA
�
�
R
■
PO
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1330-
/00"N
/00*%,
/
\
e
\
A
¥KKm
Oggk
CC='
0 ƒ2�
Ck�)
£E2�
] §. E
e'§ m 3
@ <. CL 70
E
CL _ 2
@ o
ƒ¢a¢
CD CL
o2 k
a33$
CD
om
Cn
Q.-
0
x$77
CL M. m
Cn
U0�
�0aR
�kRCL
. % 3
= o
/ §0
9�W
■ :E
(n CL
Cu w
�CA 2
CD
CD �
Co -0.
0
�.
)
0
/
U
0
�
P
-0 X -0 X
M o 0 o
aa) 0. ■
CD CL m a
k <
2 CL
am - §
CD
0 @
E o
�
CD k
CD g n 2
R m g .
Q
/
-w -69 -.9 3
�
aw¥�
� @ � •
cOC�
n
0
K � C/)
- CT
CD CL
CD
Cog'■
-• 2 0
0
0 Cr
Co CL
0 C 0
§_ � §• g
: 7 o @
000
o ■
2kE
2 :3 8
6-0ƒ
0C®
k.
a)�CD
k CD
Q
&M
CD Co CD
-0 n_
3 .0.
� \
-0.
CD
0
3
CD
�
§
CD
2
)
CL
§
-0
@
90
2.
�
]
§.
E
k
§
J
C
CL
2
0
C
n
I
0
0
�
0
/
�
]
§'
E
k
C
�
@
�
9
§
p
Packet Page -1 31
�
�
c
�
§
§
�
g
�
■
�
n
■
�
(
-a 0
»
�
0
\
0
$
]
CD
ƒ
0
]
�
E
\
�
�
�
■
2
�
§
12/13/2011 I m 16.A.17
00
E ■ o
CL CL
CD
C Q
j(M
J
■ � �
�2
%�2
q ƒm
C) CL
��-
_ Cn o
M $ (D
■
C C
CD
■ (
§ ƒCr =3
ED 0 =r
k3
E-4
q
�*
0
Cu
]
W.
E
k
§
■
CD
CA
�
�
7
X
0
D
k
�
m
�
�
R
■
w
•
I z
O
- gcn^K9M
co CA U) (n X,
Cl) cc3
o�c�3c2 CO
CCD =v
CCDD y O
Q- Q°NCCD D CD (D
.CD v Q
CD -. CD Cy
, O CD O _a O
3 -0 2) C CL
Q 7 = =r 0 < Q Cn
CL
m
0 70
W
0 c
3 Q. o
5
o • sU v
o : Q -9•
CD o =3
Err -0 5 Q
O (nQV
a) Q CD is Uy)�
Q ; �Q TF
1 y
Q CD
► Q CD =
M O C
N
7 Z N
O
ncGD3Q
O
:3 :3 7 CD
CL
O (Q < CU
Cn_
_ ID Q
Cn Q
C]
— Q =r
yQC-a
S fD C
(n cDD 3
Cn
Qo x Q.
CD 7
O N
Cn ,.
cn CD
CL
C CD
O n
O O
Q N
CD
c �
CD C=
Cn m
au •
-0 X -0 M
N o N O
CD Q CQD 41
a
N 0 Sv
n
O d ? C
G p t�D
:Z• CD : 3
CD m M
� CD CD to
S
N
-69 69 '.9 3
CO Co Co
vvvF-
n
0
O p Cn -n
aoi CL CD
CD p (D 'O"
`/ rt C
o
CA Q
CD 0 Cr
1 Q
Cn c CD
::r :3
CD O
CL
O
CD O W
n O p.
CD rt
O Q O
CD -' O
Q O O
Q
O Q Cv
CD•G 3
.0
O Q- G
CD CD cD
:3 ?. 3
Co- Co CD
O CD
CD O .« 0
Cn Cn
7
n
O
Cn
Cn
Co
Packet Page -1332-
r
su
Q
Cn
n
Ca
CD
90
co'
v
0
a3i
CD
d
7
n
CD
C
Q
CD
Q
0
C
cc
C7
O
FD^•
J
O
O
N
Q
N
l<
v
CD
D
n
CD
(n
C
7
Q
CA
im
c
a�
001
CD
r
v
Q
Cn
0
CU
CD
90
cQ'
O
0
v
O
G
CD
CD
7
(n
0
O
CD
w
Co
Co
T2
N
C
CD
CO
Cn
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
d
d
7
O.
CA
n
w
CD
--i x6G)
° v O O
N Q _ v
Q.`c W z
Q) CD <
3 0 M
CD N
6 .
N D
= Cn
Cn
Cn
to CD CD "<
OCn O r" CA
N CM g
�CD rt0
lb
�a'l�
v >' <
�• 3 Q
CD (0-
:WD 3
. O
=3 U 0 C
j
CD C]
(]
N O
Cn
C)
C)
Cn
:-n
Dc
n-n
<n
(/1 D
WA
H
N
tD
Packet Page -1333-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
W
N
O
I�
N
rn
i
J
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
r- D
-000
''
rf�p'0 -a-u00 0M
for
� � �v --I
-- X-0
n
x
=�
N
O C O.
D) (D (D (D (D (D O .-► (D
°��'
:� fl1
.. G) O ?
O O
°?Q,�m
0
CL
CD=
Q- <0mmm0n
c
ai ��'
.m
D
(n
W N n
�
��—I
.. (a 7
M (D
(n �v,cnv,��'0
N (p --�i f�D fD C
-0
.•cn
O N
vo
0° Q. 7�
.'
CD N Z
p
C
�
0
r- =3 "�°
-C .. <' 0' 0' 0' <' CD 90
v a
N ^" a.
* °
•<
a_ 0000
D
°
m ° o m n� yp
., m
a. *
rt
•Oh 3 3
0 0
��
N `<
O fl• C
in
.O.
O 0
MinCn� as
O\
�' v
Cn --
N N C
�
,��•<(a (D
(-0 p (D rt
.
NO
ao(a w O
(D O•Q a.
i � ?D
CC0 0
��
N •0<
r�-� fA0 N
a1
-0o
° W o
5•(o < <�
° _
�m �p
0--
= v 3
(a = O -.
U O
(a (D °'
CL CD
ca °°'
om_
3—cL
�'CL0 CA 0
(D Q (D v
U) _`
(0 O
'-n j 3 * --
0 rt
CpC
a- -• Q" 3
=
N -a 3. � CD
�. cD
0 a_ 0 0
(D (/�
7 0 C Cn
-a N M
(Q 7 _ A
~` C Q.
C
C
3
rtO
3 C
< N O
°
.3
i
M
O (D
a a_
di ffl
ffl 69 � ffl 69 Efl E9 69 ffl {fl m
O a
--h
0 � (011
O O
OC. 0 �`
-h ca
Cr
°
0 '°O °
ai N
a
CL o ='�
3
0
C
m 0
3 v'
CD CD o
< a�
3= CO
(n °
666666
666666
� O
°
v w
�� a.
CD
pp °
0 3
-.°
°° °
=•m00
C �
/0
CL
-h O
-« 0 0
S•�'v
CD
�.° ccDwpMMcn
°
o ?cQ°
0 M
Q. (D 0
ip
� CD C7 a_
CD 0
-C 3
a. �
p1 00
0 0—
v 0
-a
C
0-- O N 0� (D -� O N
C ') -a 0 0(D `< 3 -O
° C
S
N (011 �
`<
(D O Q
0 O
O (n
^.
°:o
3a
Sjo 0 C C 7 "O O °
°—.nom m
(<D
3 rr
.G O 0
Er
Cn �'o
0
mm a<i
ooa�'<
0
v
m � -0 Cr
°' -
c
0 "O m �
o
to a.
N -0-0 r Q°j <
n�
O n
(n
-w
Cn
(D 0 o< a. (D goo
CD C
0 v
N
p
.. O O
N
v `G
< �< O N.
N T�n3i`<
O
N
(Cn a3
(ten°
5. 2.
v CL
�(D
Q j'
(D rt
O ��
n'
(OD N
a.
(D 1 `< <
? O a
Q' w CD
(Q
„i (n l<
`I
'
CD
0
CD
rt
ti•
�b
o
�Q
(D N
CL w
(D N
0 v
o °
m v
< CD
W
C o
W
m a.
v
Packet Page -1334-
H
N
N
Ln
Packet Page -1335-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
O
W
N
O
t�
F-'
W N
C
v m
CD
v
O 0
S m
CL
o
CL '
C Cl)
CL
CD
C- N
O
3 O
N 3
n rn
O
Q O
� C7
❑. 0
0 r-
0
O
Cn
3
w
M�
0 v
O :3
m
Packet Page -1336-
Ni
0
CD
O
cn•
90
Q
C
v
O
p
69
4
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
O
n
O
O
0
N
-]
0
o o
CL
�
D
CD n
;
v
,�
N O
IM
-<
v 2)
n�
Cn
vio �<
��. °cfDna3i v�ir °R�
I3r"X
W
=3
cc)
in = O
0�m�a�iv�CD
CD
OD CD U)
CO - 0)
O
CL
0
CD
v
oo
�
0
(D
COD
�.
jO
fD
oo O
0)
<
N
O O <
n -z Q
o
3
a
Cu
Ch
n)
�
"
rt
D. co c� m
csp
v
C
cQ obi r
y � CL
a
CD
r
'� Q- Cn
CD O
<
0
=
Cu
M
cc
0
O
..
cc
v
O 0
cN v
Cn
�
�•
(D
�
Cr
O
N
CD
O.
=
69
69
I{
69
69 -69 69 69 69
69 69 69 .69 69
O
O
y
O
OCR
O o
O Z_ O
I(7
CCO 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O
p
�_ Q
CD C
CL Q Q Q Q
O
ri
O
vQ.N
_Z
C7 CD
0L QQQ.Qfl.
Q
•
O
v
O
O
N
rn
m
rt
=
-
CL
C
CD
.-.
_ O
<
� Q- C U)
0
=
O
= G) -a a
d
v ' Q o (b
CD
o
-0
m�v v
a)cn<
�� n-0 o
n
°-
0,
—m0m<
CL 7
2)
N cc
w 0 m
�
'
0
BCD
=mIrnco
CD =3
'cu
n0i "
= CD 0 cu
< n0i
0ni-1 90
N-"
Cn
" m CD 0
O
C
0
Packet Page -1336-
Ni
0
CD
O
cn•
90
Q
C
v
O
p
69
4
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
O
n
O
O
0
N
-]
0
o o
CL
�
D
CD n
;
v
,�
N O
IM
-<
v 2)
C
Cn
vio �<
r
I3r"X
cc)
in = O
v
OD CD U)
CO - 0)
;u
U) �3O
Cu CD
CL
v
oo
v � A)
(D
c0
(D �_
#
O O <
n -z Q
Z
cD O
N O S
CD
N
Co 3
cD —
cu D.
C
1
,(o
(ti
o
0
0
A
H
Fr
ID
rn
wo
Packet Page -1337-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
0
W
N
O
F-'
N
ON
.p
i
s
s
s
c
c
s
s
i
c
i
i
c
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
u -- ?v
msuCac°>0
cD a-
aiD3ommCD
m o m m su
N N 7 (O M 07
CLy Er 0
N I m a y
o CD fn <0
y N S Q a
n y, CD
f0 O X 7
� N W
O
-4 N d
O . n `.
CL =
N
7 X bo
CD
7 CD
d (D
CD CD 3
O N
I w �
3
rp 0o m o
u,
13-
s
06
CD
< _
n.
3 T.
fD
O zCD
Q
CD 0
m
O n
O� W
.p
4 fD
O N
aa�a
O O O a
0 0 0 0
n Eli 1
—L-L-
Packet Page -1338-
0X
vi
D
<
CA ,
yH
W
r
N
roo
�a
,O
� N
� O
l0
Packet Page -1339-
in
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
w
N
0
N
0
Iz
O
W
v Cn
�c
J3
o °
N
p- CD
C CD (D
I _a C
CD CL
° o
v �
CL
Q
o .
�Q
CL
(D o'
�' a)
a) °
°�
CL co
Q
(D
N n
O
� O
O �
O
n
O
C
7
lG
C
a)
O
Q.
a)
a
O
1
CD
CD
�F
T�
CD
O
�h
CD
1..i.
CD
n
O
�h
G•
CD
c
fD
o N p
C N
N
�m
a)
0�3
@ O
cCDD
m
COD O M
Co
U)
69 69 1 �C
--i fA
co ok
C
C�.
O
�-�
CD �.
CD
Cc U)
C
°
co O °
N Q
O Cr
C (D
(2.5.
N O
n O
O a)
O Q.
CD '•
Q O
C �
O �
(Q �
^3
W
om.
lT
170
T°
T
CD CD
O
O.
CD 0
�F
T
Packet Page -1340-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
H
N
(D
OD
1
RW
D
o ��
O
o
a
o
a
n�Q0Z
D
cn
v
r_
°
v
°'
CL U)
my
v
=_
CD.
�•
Q.
rn
� �
go
y
�
O CO CD W
CA
�.
a)
o
fu
2)
a)
a
(D 2) C
a)
°
j�m
Q°
o
0
°
ca 3 1 D
Co -
C� rnv
O
<
N K y
0
(O
f D
Q r+
O
NCD
D
p O
� � �v
n
o
Co
�.�oD
cfl CD
v
°
3
° W
0
m
�
CD
CD
'n
'<
CL
cc
O
a3
=r 5
cn
rn
.':-4
� Co
c
4
a) 3
° _
c
M
CD _m
y
N
'
O
CD -�
-�
+O
N
C) =+.
O
Cn �.
O
O
O
O
fA
O
CI)
O
O
O
H
N
(D
OD
1
RW
rn
i
111-\
Iz
0
CD
N "
—i K
�Cn
I C
--1 3
0 m
CD
SZ CD
a fD
(D -0
3
CD Q
Q O
3 0.
CD
O Q
N a
ca. O
N O
7 a
0.
sZ
W CD
a1 0
o
N►
O
O
3
0
c
0
C
v
0
CL
v
3_
CD
CD
cQ
o-
c
CD
0
CD
0.
CD
0
0
v
CD
c
CD
0CD0
CL m M CL
a
0a 3
sv
v �o
CD =
COD O N
Co
W
Co p -1
C=
n
O
Cn =r1 0
CD n.
'. D
CO CO)
W.
=1 0
r- m
Q j.
CCDD O
g•a
0 O0
0
o a
CD �-
a o
ca
cQ �
3 <<
v N
6
m 3.
.a
� o
CD
m m
o
v-0
m C.
0
v
c
m
r
v
Q.
0
a�
a
m
cQ'
v
0
0
90
7
v
N
O
v
O
0
CD
C
O
Q.
CD
s?.
C
c
0-
U)
r
rn
Cn
0
C
0
Packet Page -1341-
0
c
m
as
as
0
n
0
r
0
CL
Cn
0
v
a
CD
90
cQ'
v
0
3
a
O
CD
N
N
0
O
a
(D
CD
T
O
O
N
Efl
.A
rn
0
0
C)
Mj
as
O
a
as
m
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
a)
Q.
CD
CL
a)
a�
O
v
7
CD
O
v
CL
a-
0
N
a
CD
O.
CD
a1
n
ooc)
o. o
3 M
(D 0
CL G)
WCDW
w Co CD
CD
W ao
vo
,
u, 3. d
ocD�
Cn
rn
U) CD tOH
+, _L ,•r
O O
O N W
COD Q
O <
'� v �D
-�
W Cn)C
� � G
3
y �
CD O
7 3
v __
0
(D
v w
CD
to
rn
N v
0
0
0
X
v
D
Cn
C;
M
O
z
Cl)
H
N
tD
w
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
W
N
O
F-�
Packet Page -1342-
10—�,
Section 7
PHASING AND FUNDING SCHEDULES
Golden Gate Beautification Master Plan
Multiple Year Roadway Phasing 6 Funding Schedule
The phasing and funding schedule was developed to address the Collier County
major arterial roadways within the M.S.T.U. first and then improve the
collector roadways within the M.S.T.U. district. It is apparent these
roadways are the Gateway roads within the Golden Gate Community, as well as
for southeast Collier County and the Naples Urban Area. This phasing schedule
is in keeping with the Master plan goals and original philosophy behind the
original Golden Gate Parkway East roadway beautification project.
The phasing and funding schedule is based upon the concept to continue the
public /private partnership with the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners. This schedule is also consistent with the Collier County's
past actions to assist in funding and implementation of roadway
beautification within the Naples Urban Area on a case by case basis. The
schedule is also consistent with the previously adopted "Collier County
Streetscape Master Plan" and the recently adopted "Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan ". The schedule is in keeping with the methodology,
intent, and streetscape network of roadways to be improved by the above
mentioned Master Plans. The methodology of the multiple year schedule is to
assist the County in reducing the time frame and funding cost of the roadway
landscape improvements by utilizing local residents tax dollars and volunteer
services for administration of the projects. The multiple year schedule
benefits the County and local residents by saving money and beautifying
Collier County roadways.
The schedule costs do not take into account potential outside funding from
grants or private local organizations.
M.S.T.U. Major Arterial Roadways
#1: Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Part "A"
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
#2: Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Part "B"
(Golden Gate Parkway to Green Blvd.)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
FY 1997 -1998 (Completed)
Type T5
Funded under the Collier County
M.S.T.D.
Existing curbed roadway.
FY 1998 -1999 (Completed)
Type T3 curbed
Funded under the Collier County
M.S.T.D.
7 -1 03/1997
0''/6,011 .'! /`9_n
Packet Page -1343-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Curbing: Existing curbed roadway.
#3: Santa Barbara Blvd., North, TImproved Six Lane Section Formatted: Font color: Red
(Golden Gate Canal to end of Six Lane
Improvements, Phase I)(Golden - - G& &' te end of --- -- - - --- -
Implementation date: 1999 2,999 Undetermined, (To be Formatted; Font color: Red
implemented under Collier County
Landscape beaut i.ficati.on Master - Fornatted: Font color: Red
Plan)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5
Annual maintenance: To be funded under the Collier
County (M.S.T.D.) Transportation
Ser. =i es landscape maintenance
bud ger_s. _ en FRe- _
(Te Ere
_fHA64--4
SSE -_ _c _aa4s-
Curbing: ee- ,;- T� Existin :tea. Formatted: Font color: Red
I n c t a l I e renelway Tg Formatted: Font color: Red
E-
#4: Santa Barbara Blvd North Phase-14 Unimproved Four Lane Section -1 Formatted; Font color: Red %te Ganal to ..____-d- n -_,-._ (End of Six Lane Improvements to
Green Blvd. , Phase II)
Implementation date: = ? i '- ^' Undetermined (To be lFOnaatted;FoMmlor.Red
Implemented under Collier County
Landscape ,Peaut:if.icat.ior, Master Formatted: Font color: Red
Plan)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5
Annual maintenance: To be funded under the Collier
-Count,,, (M S T D ) Transportation
Services landscape maintenan
buduets.Raseq OF1 - �inde-= i• y��
Curbing: -: __ ` -I Formatted: Font color: Red
Instailed with roadway improvement
cro ect s'. ,
M.S.T.U. Interior Collector Roadways
#1: Tropicana Blvd.
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway, East)
Implementation date: FY 2002 -2003 (Completed)
7 -2 03/1997
Packet Page -1344-
n
Typical landscape plan:
Lighting:
Annual maintenance:
Curbinq:
Pathwav Facilities:
#2: Sunshine Blvd.
(Golden Gate Parkway to Green Canal)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Lighting:
1 maintenance:
Curbing:
Pathway Facilities:
Type T3 curbed
Pedestrian accent fixture at median
ends.
M.S.T.U. funded
FDOT Type "D" medians only
Existing Two Lane Road in -road
pathway and 5' asphalt sidewalk
along both rights -of -way.
FY 2006 -2007 (Completed)
Type T3 curbed
Pedestrian accent fixture at median
ends.
M.S.T.U. funded
FDOT Type "D" medians only
Existing 5' asphalt & concrete
sidewalk along both rights -of -way
#3: Hunter Blvd.
(Coronado Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd. North)
ementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
Pathway Facilities:
FY: 2010 -2011 (Under
Construction) 9:e be de�E?Emiiiee
Tyne 7'5T e.. -
M.S.T.U. funded
FDOT Type medians only
Existing Two Lane Road In -Road
Pathway. Recommended 5'concrete
sidewalk along south & west rights -
of -way.
#4: Coronado Parkway
(Golden Gate Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd. North)
Implementation date: FY: 2010 -2011 (Under Construction)
7 -3 03/1997
Packet Page -1345-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Typical landscape plan:
Type T_—
Annual maintenance:
M.S.T.U.
funded
Curbing:
FDOT Type
"yF" medians only
Pathway Facilities:
Existing
5' asphalt & concrete
sidewalks
along both rights -of -way.
7-4
03/1997
0 3 l C'11 01,1 9 ;$
Packet Page -1346-
W A w
4e O O A
?001N, G m m M
3 F- D
I ) T O
D
n o
m H m <
0 z Z a
y C 1 Z
O m -4
w
0
N
/,—*N
+ Z
q
3 t^
� N
m
m p
Z n
1 D
T <
o w
N Z
M O
D >
z <
< m
C
r 3
M
to . y
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
T T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
T
-G
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T
<
T T
< N
r
N
W
n
W
A
N
r
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
yn 2° <
y1
m z X
rm
o
0
c
? m
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
Z+
w y
n o 00
W W
W
N
T
N
N
N
N
WN
N
N +
N
N
N O
N
W N
+
V
A A
V
N
W
V
W
w N
W
a
A
r W
V
O
•.+
WO
N Z
A N O
A
W
W
W
W
W
W
M
W
W
O
W
W
W
O
W
W
V
O
A
W
N
W
QI
..
W
W
m
G1
N N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
p
A A
A
A
A
A
A
A
W
W
W
W
W
W
w
W
e N C
D i T
A W
W
N
N
N
O
O
W
W
t0
W
W
W
V
V
y m
z
�I
V W
N
W
O
A
w
V
N
A
A
A
W
w
N
W
O
w
W
O
M y
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
1
vm
= ,
<
R O
°
^'
o
M e
v
m
N
m
W
°
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
(7 m
o A to
Z
M
e <
z
<
m m
w
co
tN
r Z T
O
o
<
N N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
C 3
W W
W
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
+
t/°1 O
< <
m
W W
W A
N j
A
OO
A
W
j
W
A
W
j
01
j
O
W
O
A
V
W
W
W
T
V
W
W
GO
W
W
V
w
V
W
W
rn
OI
N
N
'o
W
A
W
no
V
N
A
rn
O
W
+"0
W
m
y 3
m
r 1
O
N
A
O
N
►
W
N
`
W
A
.�
N M
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C 3
T C T
z
to <
W
m V
W N
Oo
N
V
O
N
_.Ai
A
A
O
W
W
V
N
A
A
V
Co
o
N
O
V
W
W
A
O
+
N
W
+
m
p1
N
W
N
W
W
W
O
+
W
N
W
O
V
0
1 m
A �i O< m
° j D Z
N
O v
m
p i
c �
D n 1
Z c M
D
OZ
m
O
a
° D
< O
° n
°o
p 0
C.
v j n
toil
1 1
Packet Page -1347-
y CC
r
A =1
m m
Z <
C m
M D
N c
M Z
C Z
Z °
z
M D
2 y
D 2
T G)
3 n
m
°c
M r
M
c m
N
to
G) 3
O 1
I M
Z °
C X
T O
< `m
0
O
Z
Z
M c
v _v
O i
I m
M 3
H
su
Or
r
m
N
O
APPENDIX:
References
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
http: / /www.ada.gov/
Collier County
http: / /www.colliergov.net/
Land Development Code,
http: / /www.municode.com /library /library.aspx
Collier County Streetscape Master Plan
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =29
Construction in Public Rights -of -way Standards
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =1415
�"t���. 6�6J6a J }��e�'�6�c —£3c�7 rzxccc�cr�pccGt x rim
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=257
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program
Collier County Transportation Services
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =570
Collier County Development and Environmental Services
http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=103
Comprehensive Planning Section
http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=96
Transportation Engineering & Construction Management
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =122
Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee
http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=1454
Metropolitan Planning Organization, M.P.O.
http : / /www.colliercountympo.com/
Pathways
http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=1476
8 -1
Packet Page -1348-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 8
12/2007
03/2011^99
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
http:// www. freshfromflorida .com /publications.html
ht-tp deaes. sf-ate . h;-,.,,
Division of
"Urban Trees
Division of
"Grades and
"Grades and
Palms ", 3rd
Forestry
for Florida" September 1980
Plant Industry
Standards for Nursery
Standards for Nursery
edition, 1975
Plants ", 3rd edition 1973
Plants, Part II, Trees and
Florida Department of Transportation
F.D.O.T. Safety Home
http: / /www.dot.state.fl.us /safety/
aistriet -Gne, Distr }et ..a..ea-pe 7J...r..ger pee : _L_ o
Walking Safety Brochures
http: / /www.dot.state.fl.us /safety /ped bike /brochures /ped bike bro
chures walking.sht
"Fl£Eire Pe4eetrtan Safe:�y Plan", Fel3ruaLy, -1
" eek fey Walkable
"rReadvday —and TEaf le Design Standards", january, 1995, ,/,
"Standar-d SpeeA44:eati -ens fed' Pend airs -ai'j:E ge
1993 er mest etsL=ent -men
F.D.O.T. Maps & Publications
"Roadway and Traffic Design Standards"
"Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction"
http: / /www. dot. state .fl.us /mapsandpublications/
"Florida Highway Landscape Guide ", April, 1995
http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us /emo /beauty /lanscap.pdf
Florida Irrigation Society
http: / /www.fisstate.org/
"Standards and Specifications for Turf and Landscape
Irrigation Systems ", February, 1996
Florida Nurserymen and Growers Association, F.N.G.A.
http: / /www.fngla.org /certifications /FCHP
ngla. erg /eery ieat-ien,/FGTrr yp
8 -2
Packet Page -1349-
12/2007
03/201191,
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
"Florida Certified Horticulture1 Professional Manual"
South Florida Water Manaaement District "WaterWise" Florida Landscapes
http: / /www.swfwmd.state.fl.us /publications /files /waterwise landscapes.
pdf South- Fleeida -Water Management Distriet
ewe iel- 2 4 3 4, 19518859 -2 4 3 4
da die � ta�� s•c- Tema= P6�'F��
8 -3
Packet Page -1350-
12/2007
03/201191,/2
I
w
�
v
I
�
G
�
CD
I
I
I
I
I
D
fD
till
k
k
I
k
i
I
O
x
O
17
O
0
a
c c
i
0
0)
N
O
90
R
CD
S�
:�; ,
O
iE7
s
v
A
I
1
1
i
8
I
I
1
n'
b' I
1
2
ry
ES
'3
E
M' To and
14P. a' -W l4 w�osrc <vr. xs' -t4' tVP. fO'-SM
p PAW uNE
G
I
I
D
k
k
I
k
i
I
O
3
\
Lu—
0' a
:�; ,
:
I k
v
A
n
8
n'
c
S
1
2
ry
ES
%
'
x
r
m
I
�
�yy
2�i
rig
�•
1` $
\
.j z
Z
-1
u
z
ii
n 7
I
N
0$
£
m
0
g
3a
�
yyRp�
xZA'
F
IN
L nii
i
K ^
m
m
x
O Ar�
U)
0
O i
7
a �
D �
g
R
F�y
1
fi
i
Assariatm Go& Crate Wtt Gistr ct
Landscape Architecture rypicalAoadwaytandscapePaan
P Nnclebed 1M a wider and curbed 20 a w der me3alxl
P. O. Box 8052 coca. cover cwaa
NSP1ea,Fbn Iax da 34101 om. m: anwccrw.
1941) 263-0488 ttne u.is. rGan
g�
R
p PAW uNE
G
O
Lu—
0' a
:�; ,
:
v
A
n
8
a
age
Assariatm Go& Crate Wtt Gistr ct
Landscape Architecture rypicalAoadwaytandscapePaan
P Nnclebed 1M a wider and curbed 20 a w der me3alxl
P. O. Box 8052 coca. cover cwaa
NSP1ea,Fbn Iax da 34101 om. m: anwccrw.
1941) 263-0488 ttne u.is. rGan
g�
R
xJ4'to lid IeoaDlw•Y itK416N•(
1,4 4/u uNL
Y r
� E
O
3
X
� g a
I
w a; £
Ln
J It
CD
g p �
QQ
0
0 _IINL
N
S CD
m
O) 0 yy po -
= T
o y
N },
Y
f
o p
-;.. o - 3
ID
N
�i
Pa
( N �e
x
lip
it LL
V— t
�Z i
TR. ' -sJ �rl4. a' -rN IM 1 �IRa ivr. u' -xN 1YI. mt s+'
Maury y�
I.
� ulTi
V.�
�
I
v
a
� SIR
+
OQ
�
Z
�
♦ Z
I
I
I
P
�
a
�y�
r
_ m
I
a
•.
9
�iiglpP\
1
�gz
a
f
Golden Gee B�utifioatpn D shiLt
Landscape Architecture C(i h� U�vekn
P.O. Box 8052 Wa wader and add 20 or wkWff WW
cew. cw.v. rwle.
Naplaa, Florida 34101 .rnwen n: a...ln: nic nlwccr 1.
(847)263 -0486 .. ".lass n.w.n Dowse
'Q QQ�� xOTr! /lvelCNV:
GoWmG&ftolMion0idricl
Landscape Architecture ryprlaea�an
P. o: 8 x 8052 (UmmrW W or wider and arW 20 or widermefto) F,
Naples, Fbnde 34101 on. ...:,,onrvn: ,wo,r�r�r�, ��c��,5
(941(283 -0488 uTa. n.wn ir�nnaue
GWM CIA Bmffmtim aft
Landscape Architecture . „w �s, T
P. O. Box 8052
Nrcurbed 14 a rrida ard alrbed 20 a wider mdow
Naples, Florlde 34101 rnc,co m: Corr ai.um: nrn rew¢r
(941) 263 -0488 acme rss n.nn. lvona
ID
�t
xx14, l�A� YDO.DWAY 6nfiEn6ll'f
3
a*�*
all
D
CD
b
o�
R
D �s
' z
Z
s
n
�ctis
LINE
;i
°
�+
(D
€
z�
a�
CD
W
Ln
Ln
-o
0
'D
0
0)
a
i
C
K<1
0
(DD
Cl)
<
(D
a
0
z
Ml
CD
J
t
•: a
�
z
c
z
ry,
Rj r
Y
V
ZZy
z
ZP
n
rz
xx14, l�A� YDO.DWAY 6nfiEn6ll'f
e
m
x
6
a*�*
all
D
CD
b
o�
R
D �s
' z
Z
n
LINE
;i
I � �
J
ICI
�
•ZFJ
e
m
x
6
a*�*
all
D
CD
b
o�
R
D �s
' z
e
m
x
6
D
CD
b
o�
R
D �s
' z
Z
n
LINE
v �
00
0
m
a .
o $m
0' =8
U)
CD
0
0 j
A
D
T9Pd Ao?dm LmtwPlan
Landscape Architecture .... (CurbWmdw15tD 8)
P. O, Box 8052 Ca cwmy Flo.ma
Naples, Florida 34101 nrz
(941) 263- 0488xta. :Q c*
sorzs,.cvane:
l•C�PP �C tll•tttPS colden(>Beeutifiptian0rict
Landscape Architecture'"
" " ", (Curbed medw 16 to 8)
P. 0. Baz 8032 o...:�
Naples, Elands 34101 .nnaEn .r;. sc..e v xar; wrz: nwECrx•
19411263-04 96 ut4.. ,, ta/riB8 ID
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
REVISED 03/2011
Community
Roadways
Beautification
.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Golden Gate Community Roadways
Beautification Master Plan
Prepared For:
Collier County
Board of County Commissioners
and
Golden Gate Beautification
Municipal Services Taxing Unit, M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee
Prepared By:
%1225& &'4"wz4w
Landscape Architecture
5079 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34113
(239) 417 -0707
03/1997, 01/2009, 03/2011
Packet Page -1358-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
^ COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Honorable Fred W. Coyle, District 4, Chairman
Honorable Jim Coletta, District 5, Vice Chairman
Honorable Donna Fiala, District 1
Honorable Georgia A. Hiller, Esq., District 2
Honorable Tom Henning, District 3
GOLDEN GATE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Richard Sims, Chairman
Patricia Spencer, Vice Chairman
^ Peggy Harris
Michael McElroy
Barbara Segura
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Norman E. Feder, Administrator
CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODES
Michelle E. Arnold, Director
Darryl Richard, RLA, Project Manager
Tessie Sillery, M.S.T.U. Operations Coordinator
03/2011
Packet Page -1359-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
TABLE OF REVISIONS
Section Title Date Page Figure /Table
Table of Revisions 11/24/97 R -1
5 Site Furnishing & Fixtures 11/24/97 5 -3
General Document Revisions 03/12/97
Appendix G Maintenance Specifications 03/09/98
1 - 11 General Document Revisions 03/2011 All All ALL
03/2011
Packet Page -1360-
11�
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page Figure /Table
1. Introduction ........ ..............................1 1 -1
Overview.. ............................... 1 -2
Master Plan Roadways Map ................. 1 -4 1
Beautification M.S.T.U. Boundary
Roadway Legend
2. Goals and Objectives ............................... 2 -1
3. Existing Conditions and Constraints ................
3 -1
Project Area
Climate
Description .........................
Soil and Topography
Area Vegetation ..........................
3 -2
Water Resources for Irrigation
8
Well System
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Surface Water (Canal) ....................
3 -3
Reclaimed Water
Description .........................
Potable or Treated Water
Master Plan Roadway Corridors: ..............
3 -4
1. Coronado Parkway
9
Description .........................
3 -5
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -6 2
2. C.R. 951, South
Description .........................
Part "A"
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
Part "B"
3 -21
(Golden Gate Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
8.
Description .........................
3 -7
Photograph and Section /Elevation......
3 -9 3
Description .........................
3 -10 4
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
Description ......................... 3 -11
Photograph and Section /Elevation..... 3 -12 5
4. Green Boulevard
Description ......................... 3 -13
Photograph and Section /Elevation..... 3 -14 6
3 -15 7
5.
Hunter Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -16
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -17
8
6.
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Description .........................
3 -18
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -19
9
7.
Sunshine Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -20
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -21
10
8.
Tropicana Boulevard
Description .........................
3 -22
Photograph and Section /Elevation.....
3 -23
11
Collier County Landscape Related Codes, Ordinances
Master Plans, Guidelines and Standards. 3 -24
Collier County Landscape Beautification
Master Plan
Collier County Land Development Code
(T -1)
Packet Page -1361-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
3(cont.)
�\
Chapter 2.03.07 Corridor Management
Overlay District
Chapter 4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway
Professional Office Commercial Overlay
District
Chapter 4.06, Landscaping and Buffering
Chapter 5.05.08, Architectural and Site
Design Standards and Guidelines
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
Ordinance 93 -64, Public Rights -of -way
Construction Standards
Summary and Recommendations for County Codes
Existing Pedestrian and Roadway Lighting
Existing Pedestrian Walkways and Bike Pathways
Community Gateway and Entry Roadway Signage
Roadway Beautification Attitude Survey
Existing Community Entry Signage 3 -30 12
4. Typical Beautification Plan Concepts for Roadways.... 4 -1
Uncurbed 14 feet or wider & curbed 20 feet or
wider medians
Type I, II, III & IV
Curbed Medians 20 to 8 foot wide
Type V & VI
Curbed 8 to 6 foot or less separators or median
Uncurbed Roads In -road Pathways Facility
Concepts
Recommended Beautification Concepts for the
Beautification M.S.T.U. Arterial /Collector
Roadways....... ............................... 4 -4
1. Coronado Parkway
2. C.R. 951, South,
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
Part "B" (Golden Gate Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
4. Green Boulevard
5. Hunter Boulevard
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
7. Sunshine Boulevard
8. Tropicana Boulevard
Summary 4 -7
Four lane road in -road facility 4 -8 13
Two lane road in -road facility 4 -9 14
5. Plan Elements and Design Standards ................. 5 -1
Community Colors
Pedestrian /Bicycle Pathway Facilities
Pathways Facility Design Standards
Pedestrian Crosswalk Marking
Curbing
Decorative Paving
Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting
(T -2)
Packet Page -1362-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
5 cont. Soil Analysis and Preparation
Site Furnishings and Fixtures
Street Identity and Traffic Control Signage
Landscape Sight Distance and Sight Windows
Major Intersections
Landscape Design Standards & Guidelines.......
5 -5
Existing or Proposed Curbed Roadways
Collier Blvd. C.R. 951, South
Part "A" (G.G. Canal to G.G. Pkwy.)
Part "B" (G.G. Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
Coronado Parkway
Hunter Boulevard
Sunshine Boulevard
Tropicana Boulevard
Golden Gate Parkway, East
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Phase I, (Six lane improved section)
(G.G. Canal to Coronado Pkwy.)
Phase II,(Four lane unimproved section)
(Coronado Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
Existing Uncurbed Roadways
Green Boulevard
Irrigation Water Resources and Irrigation
Systems....... ...............................
5 -8
Reclaimed Water Transmission Line Systems
Reclaimed Water Tanker Applied
Well and Pump Transmission Line System
Potable / Treated Water
Conventional Pop -up Spray Systems
Irrigation, Plant Material & Maintenance
Specifications . ...............................
5 -10
Roadway and Traffic Control Signage Details.....
5 -11
15
Curbed Turn Lane & Decorative Paving Detail.....
5 -12
16
Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm Detail .............
5 -13
17
Street /Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures......
5 -14
18
Sight Distance Diagrams .......................
5 -15
18A
Sight Window Diagrams .......................
5 -16
18B
6. Beautification Improvement Costs and Considerations.
6 -1
Coronado Parkway .............................
6 -3
Collier Blvd. C.R. 951, South
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Pkwy.)
6 -4
Part "B" (Golden Gate Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
6 -5
Golden Gate Parkway, East ....................
6 -6
Green Boulevard ..............................
6 -7
Hunter Boulevard .............................
6 -8
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North ...............
6 -9
Sunshine Boulevard ...........................
6 -10
Tropicana Boulevard ..........................
6 -11
7. Phasing and Funding Schedules ......................
7 -1
Collier County Transportation Services and
Golden Gate M.S.T.U. Community Roadway
Landscaping Priorities .......................
7 -1
Golden Gate Beautification Master Plan
Multiple Year Funding and Phasing Schedule....
7 -4
(T -3)
Packet Page -1363-
10
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page Figure /Table
8. Appendix:
References
A. Master Plan Graphic Elements
Typical Roadway Landscape Plans
Type Tl through Type T6
(T -4)
Packet Page -1364-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 1
INTRODUCTION
Collier County Government, along with the residents of the
Golden Gate Community, through a public /private partnership
since 1983, have been working together to perform roadway
landscape beautification within the Golden Gate Beautification
Municipal Services Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.). To date this
partnership has accomplished many of its initial goals and
completed six (6) miles of roadway median landscape
beautification within its M.S.T.U. boundary. The completed
roadways are Golden Gate Parkway east of Santa Barbara Blvd.,
Collier Blvd., Tropicana Blvd. and Sunshine Blvd.
The residents of the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U.
recognized the need and economic benefits associated with
roadway landscape beautification. The Golden Gate Beautification
M.S.T.U. is a local precinct voter referendum ad valorem taxing
district established for roadway corridor beautification and
maintenance purposes. The M.S.T.U. was established through
Collier County Ordinances (No.83 -55, Rev.96 -51 & No.87 -78,
Rev.96 -50), and is under the authority of the Board of County
Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners appoints a five
member Advisory Committee consisting of residents that reside
within the M.S.T.U. beautification district boundaries. The
n Committee makes recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners on the operation and budgeting of the M.S.T.U. on
a monthly basis. The day -to -day administration of the M.S.T.U.
is administered through the Collier County Transportation
Services Division, Alternative Transportation Modes Department.
The Advisory Committee, after completing the initial Golden Gate
Parkway median landscape beautification project, concluded that
a Master Plan encompassing all the community roadways was needed
in order to properly understand and guide the Committee and
Community in proceeding with present and future beautification
projects.
This Roadway Beautification Master Plan will provide the
guidance, by which the Golden Gate Community will significantly
enhance its image while creating a vision for the future.
Aesthetically enhanced and well maintained roadways are the
first image of a Community's economic vitality and self pride.
Landscaped roadway corridors help to increase property values
and encourage new residents and businesses to locate within a
Community.
1 -1 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1365-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
OVERVIEW
For purposes of this Master Plan the Golden Gate Community will /1
consist of a 4 square mile unincorporated area of Collier
County. The Community contains a community center, shopping
centers, recreation facilities, schools, library, fire station,
police facilities, and government meetings center. The
Beautification M.S.T.U. District also contains local businesses,
single and multi - family residents within the Community.
The Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U. District encompasses a 4
square mile area known as Golden Gate City (See Figure 1). The
M.S.T.U. District is located approximately 4.5 miles east of the
City of Naples. The.M.S.T.U.'s eastern boundary is the eastern
right -of -way of (C.R. 951) Collier Blvd.; the northern boundary
is the north right -of -way of Green Blvd.; the west boundary is
the west right -of -way of Santa Barbara Blvd.; and the south
boundary is the Golden Gate Canal. The M.S.T.U. District is
bordered to the north, east and west by an area known as Golden
Gate Estates which consist dominantly of residentially zoned
property. To the south by the Golden Gate Canal which is abutted
by the Golden Gate Regional Park, Golden Gate High School and
several residential planned unit developments.
A major influence upon the Golden Gate Community is the
Interstate 75 roadway corridor which passes within less than one
mile of the M.S.T.U.'s south and west boundary lines. There are
three Interstate 75 interchanges (Pine Ridge Road, Golden Gate
Parkway and Collier Blvd.) that greatly impact this community.
Bisecting the M.S.T.U. District from east to west is the Golden
Gate Parkway roadway corridor which is a major east /west traffic
corridor from the City of Naples and the Interstate 75 and
Golden Gate Parkway interchange into the Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Community. This roadway has been designated with a Parkway
status and listed as a major corridor roadway in the Corridor
Management Study" dated 1988 and the "Collier County Streetscape
Master Plan" dated 1997. In 2006 the eastern portion of Golden
Gate Parkway within the M.S.T.U. District received special
development designations through the adoption of the Golden Gate
Master Plan.
In May of 1996 the Beautification Advisory Committee voted to
develop and began a process through public meetings /workshops,
working with County staff and the District landscape
architectural consultant to create a Community Roadways
Beautification Master Plan. The plan would address the County
and Community major internal and external arterial and collector
1 -2 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1366-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
roadways that are within or would have a major influence on the
M.S.T.U. District.
The Master plan addresses the following elements:
1. Goals and Objectives
2. Site Inventory and Analysis
3. Concept Development
4. Written and graphic guidelines to assist in the
Community's roadway beautification efforts.
5. Cost Budgeting and Implementation Phasing
The Master plan is based on the concerns, observations and
desires identified by the general.Public, Residents, Civic
organizations, Advisory Committee, County staff and Consultants.
In order to provide for roadway beautification and continued
landscape maintenance to enhance the Community's image, pride,
and economic vitality while providing for pedestrian and
vehicular safety.
HISTORICAL REFERENCES
On May 27, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
considered Agenda Item 8 (B), (1) which recommended the approval
of the Golden Gate Community Roadways Beautification Master
n Plan, accept the annual maintenance cost for the Golden Gate
Parkway and to enter into a funding partnership for the
beautification of the medians on CR 951 (Collier Blvd.) and
north Santa Barbara Blvd. within the boundaries of the MSTU. The
BCC approved the Master Plan concept, agreed to take over the
annual maintenance costs on the Golden Gate Parkway and directed
that the beautification of medians CR 951 and Santa Barbara
Blvd. be considered for future budget cycles. In page eight of
the executive summary the cost estimates for Santa Barbara Phase
1 and Phase 2 provided to the BCC for north Santa Barbara Blvd.
from Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.
On February 3, 1998 Agenda Item 16(B),(5) The BCC approved "
Consider a County Arterial Roadway Landscape Improvement Funding
Partnership with the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU for CR 951
where the Golden Gate MSTU requested a two year funding
partnership for CR 951. The Golden Gate MSTU funded the median
improvements on the southern portion of CR 951 ( Part "A ") at
the estimated cost of $213,000 during the Fiscal Year 1997- 1998
and that the County would fund the median landscape improvements
on the northern portion of CR 951 ( Part "B) at the cost of
$294,000. The County would then assume the annual maintenance of
costs for both sections estimated at $132,000 per year.
1 -3 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1367-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
The Board of County Commissioners in 2003 incorporated the
"Golden Gate Community Roadways Beautification Master Plan" into
the Collier County Land Development Code.
In April 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the
"Collier County Beautification Master Plan" which addressed the
existing and future roadway landscape beautification and
maintenance of the arterial roadways within the Golden Gate
Community 4 square mile area addressed by this Master Plan. The
roadways affected by the "Collier County Beautification Master
Plan" are Golden Gate Blvd., Collier Blvd., Pine Ridge Road,
Logan Blvd., Santa Barbara Blvd., Golden Gate Parkway west of
Santa Barbara Blvd. and the Interstate 75 interchanges.
Based upon the above the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U.
Advisory Committee, in 2006 recommended an updating of this
Master Plan.
1 -4
Packet Page -1368-
03/1997
03/2011
"-,*N
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
T Q= 6i3 5 -T
mrtmwa 'n's'S'Id L1�IS`iJT.�rTrxaasr
S Hitrld 27saiSE�I NjIypDT.AT.rLWM — — — — — —
• W`47►Jr11
p-7cE EUeDT L 6
PaVABTn011 Our4sun1S
q4—H 'p —TnoS Exegxeg v4—S g Pa °1Pe2! sse ,
PxeAsTnDS M-14urH 'S e..,°�m P
pxe&9TroH use3o 6 s 8 s r
PATS UDOM Cr4 •A-g 'Erf) _ 8 �- }i�$1P� '►> :
'ugu 42ed 'tp—s ' (TS6 '2I'z))
hog ''9 D3 T�J aqE9
L�PTD9 ��2IIH i2IHg 4 "'
' 9 .�Y" 4-Td 'tpnos ' (TS6 '2i'�) 3 a Z£ F
psenaTnoS - TeMo'J Z £i
' T
A[- 43��yd�y�atP —o'J '
• I �
F �1
0
l Ntl 31tl
9
IL
F b K
3 M
4 nV ))) 1 . ♦ J)
. R . Rn+Md a1eE) uePl °J a
6Z
LZ'
9Z �
f . s a r
•" :i M x7t miw.�
4 • � �s
M6 AV w.z o SIVO N'�Q'I00
FD'
J ,.+
W C�
.: wr wu ♦r ek .,
R 8E M� 0 DUOJO
..AV. i3 b 4 Mm+e ..x jl
1� iMpte
5 A ' c b8 a SL
s S M W
ZZ• " at 'A n Mom G
M:M eSR f� . wat W OZ +�
wa.
u N,�
ww 'yes 'u 3 s-, � y �•� �
°'• o � 4 � 4 � � a
iwW.l mil. w,l �"
a�
PN8 UesJE) $
i M WL MBAV WS,
b
%I wr t
R
i M wll i.. Wl{
91 'STN
ws ..
PM8 0114M Pa 06NU awd
(/ Y P Sl/f V / {, /TT Tll.7 ATTT?
Packet Page -1369-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 2
GOALS and OBJECTIVES
The Master plan goals and objectives for roadway landscape
beautification strived to established the purposes for roadway
beautification while encouraging the community and government to
work together in order to reach the goals. The goals and
objectives were developed to encourage the community to strive
beyond the norm while being realistic in scheduling and cost.
Goals and objectives should not be considered permanent, but
must be reviewed and reset as they are reached or change. The
objectives will establish the directions or means by which the
community will follow in achieving the goals. The objectives
should be considered directives and guidelines which are
transformable into policies or programs.
GOAL #1 Enhance the visual quality and economic vitality
of the community through roadway corridor
beautification while improving the health, safety,
welfare, and quality of life for the residents and
visitors.
�1
Objectives 1.1:
Encourage adjacent roadway property owners to install, upgrade
and maintain roadside landscaping by providing assistance and
landscaping expertise to the property owner.
Objectives 1.2:
Request and assist Collier County Government in implementation
and enforcement of the Land Development Code requirements for
installation and maintenance of landscape buffers adjacent to
roadway corridors. Petition the Board of County Commissioners to
allow the Beautification Advisory Committee to review and
provide recommendation on proposed development landscape plans
in order to assure coordination with the Community's Roadway
Landscape Master Plan.
Objectives 1.3:
Encourage Collier County Government, property Owners, businesses
and community developments within and beyond the M.S.T.U.
boundaries to participate in landscape beautification of the
roadway corridors located adjacent to their property.
2 -1 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1370-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Objectives 1.4:
Enhance Community identity and unity by developing a set of
coherent beautification guidelines and standards for roadway
corridors. This can be accomplished through the selection and
coordination of lighting fixtures, site furnishing, plant
materials and roadway signage.
GOAL #2 Develop a Roadway Landscape Beautification Master
Plan which will guide the Community, Collier
County Government and the Beautification Advisory
Committee in implementing future roadway
beautification projects within and adjacent to
the Golden Gate Community.
Objectives 2.1:
Incorporate South Florida Water Management District's, South
Florida Edition "WATERWISE Florida Landscapes" guide to promote
water conservation using the Principles of Xeriscape —.
Objective 2.2:
Incorporate and /or expand upon existing County codes, standards
or guidelines, as well as the Golden Gate Master Plan polices
relating to landscaping of adjacent roadway properties and the
roadway corridors.
Objective 2.3:
Utilize native or naturalized Southern Florida plant species.
Objective 2.4•
Research and analyze the availability and use of reused water
for roadway landscape irrigation.
Objective 2.5•
Improve pedestrian /bicycle circulation and facilities.
Objective 2.6:
Improve and expand street lighting for vehicular and pedestrian
safety.
Objective 2.7:
Review traffic calming techniques and devices for possible
implementation on proposed and existing roadways.
Objective 2.8:
Incorporate the Florida Department of Transportation landscape
standards and guidelines to the greatest extent practical into
the proposed Master Plan standards.
2 -2
Packet Page -1371-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Objective 2.9•
Increase and enhance visibility of pedestrian roadway crossings
for safety purposes.
Objectives 2.10:
Develop beautification improvements that provide for reduced
long range maintenance.
Objectives 2.11:
Develop a Master Plan that will allow for roadway beautification
capital improvements and maintenance of roadways within the
M.S.T.U. based upon the existing tax millage revenues.
GOAL #3 Develop a phasing and funding strategy for the
implementation of the Community roadways
landscape beautification programs and projects.
Objectives 3.1:
Encourage continuation of the public /private partnership with
Collier County Government. Assist Collier County Government in
expediting its landscape development plans for arterial roadway
corridors which run through the Beautification M.S.T.U. and
community.
Objectives 3.2:
Encourage community organizations and residents to participate
beyond the existing beautification tax revenues by providing
additional funding and support to the beautification efforts.
Objectives 3.3:
Analyze the consequences of expanding the M.S.T.U. boundaries
for additional areas beautification and funding.
Objectives 3.4:
Identify and review Government grants, programs or funds that
could provide assistance or funding for beautification.
Objectives 3.5:
To convince Collier County Board of County Commissioners to
accept and fund landscape maintenance responsibility on the
major county arterial roadways within the M.S.T.U.
Objectives 3.6:
Assist the Collier County Government in identifying arterial and
collector roadways that are in need of roadway maintenance to
address resurfacing, restriping, and drainage improvements for
the safety of the residents and users.
2 -3
Packet Page -1372-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
Section 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS and CONSTRAINTS
Project Area
The M.S.T.U. district includes 12( + / -) miles of Collier County
arterial and collector roadway corridors. All the roads are four
lane median divided roadways, except for the western one mile of
Green Blvd. which is a two lane road.
Climate
The Golden Gate area would be described as a typical inland sub-
tropical climatic zone. The area is subject to yearly frost and
freezing temperatures of 26 to 28 degrees. The coldest
temperatures generally occur during the winter months of
December, January and February. During the summer months of June
through September the area is exposed to high temperatures and
humidity levels in the 80 and 90 percent range. The annual
rainfall exceeds 50 inches with 75 percent occurring during the
summer months of June through September. The Golden Gate area
during the peak of the rainy season experiences severe
thunderstorms that generate damaging winds and heavy rain fall
up to 3 to 4 inches per storm. The roadway medians have micro -
climates created within them due to the large amounts of
pavement surrounding them. Road temperatures can reach well
above 100 degrees during the day and maintain over a 100 degrees
well after sunset. These above conditions combined with the auto
exhaust, water pollution, blown debris and increased wind
generated from the passing vehicles creates a very harsh
environment within the medians for plants to survive in.
Soil and Topography
The roadway corridors are generally level with elevation changes
of four feet or less. The roadway is typically crowned to the
center to create a positive drainage pattern to the right -of -way
swales or curbed storm water drainage system. As typical with
most roadways, the soil used to raise the elevation and
construct the roadway were intermixed and imported from other
areas of the county. The soil within the roadway medians is
typically an intermixed stabilization material containing large
amounts of crushed limestone material and sand. It has a high PH
level of 8 or above. These soils are susceptible to compaction,
hydrophobic, poorly aerated and poor percolation. They have
limited water and nutrient holding capacities making them
unsuitable for landscape purposes. Sporadically throughout the
Golden Gate M.S.T.0 area is a sub - surface layer of cap rock or
3 -1 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1373-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
limestone. It ranges in depth from 18 to 36 inches below the
surface.
It is recommended prior to excavation or installation of any
utilities below 18 inches, that test borings be performed. In
most cases soil amendments or excavation to add new soil will be
required in order to provide improved soil conditions for
landscaping.
Area Vegetation
The roadway rights -of -way corridors have been totally cleared of
any existing native vegetation. The dominate vegetation
community surrounding the area is a pine flat -wood forest and
transitional pine /cypress forest. The dominant tree species is
the slash pine and the dominant under -story vegetation is the
saw palmetto with intermixed pond cypress, Dahoon holly and Wax
myrtle. Much of the area vegetation is in transition from
wetlands to uplands due to the past alteration of the surface
water and natural drainage.
Water Resources for Irrigation
There are four main water supply sources within the Golden Gate
area that can be used for landscape irrigation purposes.
1. Well
2. Surface Water (canal)
3. Reclaimed Wastewater
4. Potable or Treated Water
The following is a list of advantages and disadvantages for each
source:
Well System
Advantage:
Location flexible requiring minimum piping, no continuous water
cost, reduced overall system cost.
Disadvantage:
Permitting required, water could contain iron & sulfur, limits
on gallons pumped per day, no backup when problems occur, annual
metering cost, subject to water restrictions, reduces a limited
natural resource.
3 -2 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1374-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Surface Water,(Canal)
Advantage:
Source located close to all project site areas, low start up
cost, no continuous water cost, reduced overall system cost.
Disadvantage:
Additional permitting cost required; no continuous recharge
source; demand would lower canal water levels; uncontrolled
potential contamination; annual metering cost. The source and
level of water in the canals is dependent on rainfall which
occurs in this area during the months that irrigation
requirements is typically less, subject to water restrictions,
reduces limited natural resource.
Reclaimed Wastewater
Advantage:
Reuse of natural resource, low cost per gallon, provides outlet
for wastewater treatment facilities to discharge reclaimed
water. Florida Cities Wastewater treatment facility is located
within M.S.T.U. boundary and could supply quantity required. A
Collier County reclaimed water pipe line existing at the
intersection of Collier Blvd. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Reuse
water can also be applied by truck and use of reclaimed water is
an environmentally friendly irrigation method.
Disadvantage:
High initial start up cost for a piping system within the
M.S.T.U. area; Florida Cities' plant must be upgraded in order
to supply proper quality of water; a 3 mile pipe line must be
installed in order to connect to Collier County's reclaimed
water discharge system; reuse water quantity available at time
of year when watering is in demand.
Potable or Treated Water
Advantage:
Initial low start up cost; clean water source; source close to
project area requiring minimum piping.
Disadvantage:
High per gallon cost, not available to all project areas,
subject to water restrictions, reduces limited natural resource.
The following written roadway descriptions an
sections are of all the major County arterial
roadways within the 4 square mile Golden Gate
3 -3
Packet Page -1375-
d pictorial cross
and collector
Community area.
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
The written descriptions are an assessment of the existing
conditions and contain a brief description about the roadway,
signalized intersections, curbing, median description, side
right -of -way areas, roadway signage, overhead utilities, roadway
lighting, pedestrian walkways, bike pathways, and roadside
development.
The pictorial cross sections locations were selected to show the
best typical example of the existing roadway and dimensions of
the existing rights -of -way and roadway facilities.
Roadway Number Name
1 Coronado Parkway
2 C.R. 951, South
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
3 Golden Gate Parkway, East
(C.R. 951 to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
4 Green Blvd.
5 Hunter Blvd.
6 Santa Barbara Blvd., North
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
7 Sunshine Blvd.
8 Tropicana Blvd.
3 -4
Packet Page -1376-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #1
Coronado Parkway Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions: A .90 mile roadway running east and west within a 106 foot wide
road right -of -way easement. There are two 2 lane bridges over
the Coronado Canal at the western end of the roadway between
54th Terr. SW and 55th St. SW. The road is an uncurbed divided
four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. This road
is a County collector roadway.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing: The medians are mostly uncurbed, except for turn lanes and the
median noses at the shopping center entrances along with the first
median at the intersection with Golden Gate Parkway. The curb is
mountable type "A" concrete curb.
Median Description: There exist .74 miles of median green area divided into 13
medians. The medians are grassed and generally level with the
pavement. The medians range in width from 8 to 9 feet at turn
lane locations to 18 feet.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The north and south sides have grassed utility strips, 5 foot wide asphalt
and /or concrete sidewalks and then a grassed swale adjacent to the
right -of -way lines.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are overhead electric transmission lines running along
the roadway behind the shopping center. Underground electric is
present within medians supplying the street lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street lights are
located in the medians and are double standard street light fixture
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
Pedestrian walkways:
There are 5 foot wide asphalt and /or concrete sidewalk along the north
and south rights -of -way.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
Along the south right -of -way line starting at the intersection with
Golden Gate Parkway the properties are commercially developed to
52nd Terr. SW, from there to one half -block back from Santa
Barbara Blvd. is single family and duplex residences. The half
block adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd. is developed as commercial.
Along the north right -of -way line starting at the intersection
with Golden Gate Parkway it is developed with Public facilities to
Lucerne Road, from Lucerne road to one half -block back from Santa
Barbara Blvd. is single family, multi - family and duplex
residences. The remaining half -block is developed as commercial.
3 -5 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1377-
M /21
M/a
w
J
� Fa
°
2 W 0
V) N
� Q N
W 0
J
In ¢ Gi
3
I
F-
a z
>- Li
F- YL
w
iu Q
Nr
r
Q
3
V
ry
a
cn °
z A
Q
= > o
p� N J U
l7
CL 0 C Z
d
N
r-y
X,
W
J
Q
_U
d
r
CL z
>- w
H X:
W
(u >
N 0-
I
M
06
r-
M
a-I
00
m
CL
v
U
m
d
1 �
� W
A
T J
C A
O W
2 N
ry
d) Q
W 0
J
Q
3
o
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #2
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951.) South Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions: A 2 mile roadway running north and south within a 100 foot
wide road right -of -way easement. This roadway will be
subdivided into two smaller sections. Part "A" is the southern one
mile south of Golden Gate Parkway and Part "B" is the northern
one mile north of Golden Gate Parkway. Both part "A" & "B" are
divided four lanes with curbed medians and curbed outside traffic
lanes. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH. The entire roadway is a
major County, Community and Golden Gate City arterial roadway.
The southern end of Part "A" ends at the first Naples northbound
Interstate 75 interchange. This roadway is a major entrance into
the Golden Gate Community. Part "B" roadway is built 50 feet
( + / -) into the existing 100 foot canal easement.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing: Part "A ": Medians and outside traffic lanes are all curbed with
vertical type "F" curb and gutter.
Part "B ": Medians and outside lanes are all curbed. The 3
medians between Golden Gate Parkway and 20th PI. have
vertical type "F" curb. The remaining medians from
20th PI. to Green Blvd. have mountable type "E" curb.
The outside traffic lanes are curbed with vertical type
"F" curb and gutter. The medians with turn lanes
built in them have solid concrete separators the distance
of the stacking area of the turn lane.
Median Description: Part "A ": There exist .89 miles of median green area. The medians are
Improved with landscaping and irrigation. The medians
Generally are 18 feet wide.
Part 'B ": There exist .90 miles of median green area. The medians are
improved with landscaping and irrigation.
Side Rights -of -Way: Part "A ": The west side right -of -way is a grassed shoulder that
slopes into a drainage swale. On the east side of the right -
of -way directly behind the curb is a standard metal
guardrail that extends the full length of the section of
roadway. From the back of curb, under the guardrail, a
distance of four feet ( + / -) is asphalt pavement. From
the end of the pavement under the guardrail starts a
grassed canal bank.
Part "B ": The west side right -of -way is grassed with a 5 foot
sidewalk along the right -of -way line. The grassed area
is either level with back of curb and /or sloping into a
drainage swale. The east side right -of -way has a grassed
retention swale varying in width starting at the back of
curb. This swale is prior to the canal top of bank. This
retention swale handles roadway drainage prior to
flowing into the adjacent canal.
Roadway signage: The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post and metal
poles.
3 -7 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1379-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Page two
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), South
Overhead utilities: Both Parts A & B have overhead electric transmission lines along
the west right -of -way line.
Roadway lighting: Part "A ": There are no street lights continuously along the
roadway only at the intersections with other roads.
Part "B ": There are street lights continuously down both sides of
the roadway. The street lights are standard mansard arm
metal poles with cobra head light fixtures.
Pedestrian walkways: Part "A ": There are no sidewalks on either side of the roadway.
Part "B ": There is sidewalk along 95% of west right -of -way.
Bike pathways: Part "A ": There are no off -road or on -road designated facilities.
Part "B ": There is a 5 foot off -road facility shared with
pedestrians.
Roadside Development: Part "A ": Along the east right -of -way line is a 100 foot drainage
canal easement. Along the west right -of -way line from
the Golden Gate canal to a point 500 feet ( + / -), before
the intersection with Golden Gate Parkway is a golf
course facility. The remaining 500 feet is undeveloped
commercially zoned property.
Part "B ": Along the east right -of -way line is a 100 foot drainage
canal easement. The west right -of -way has heavy
roadside commercial development existing and the
remaining vacant property is zoned for continued
commercial development.
Landscape Development: Parts "A" and "B" median landscape and irrigation is complete.
3 -8 03/1997 �\
03/2011
Packet Page -1380-
W
I
N•
n
(D
W
H
O
d
d
H
N
n
O
r
r
H
LM
po
n
hd
t0
Is
F�
H
Pay..__
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
H
O
d
t7
H
t
N
O �
n
%0
U1
.Ft
H
bd
N -
QQ
n
..
Pack« r-arc
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
O
r
r
H
W
M
O �
n
%0
U1
.Ft
H
bd
N -
QQ
n
..
Pack« r-arc
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #3
Golden Gate Parkwav, East Existing Conditions
(C.R. 951, South to Santa Barbara Blvd., North)
Roadway descriptions: A 2.5 mile roadway running east and west within a 130 foot
3 -11
Packet Page -1383-
03/1997
03/2011
wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a curbed divided
four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. This
roadway is a major County, Community and Golden Gate east /
west arterial roadway. This roadway is the main roadway through
the Golden Gate Community from the Naples Urban area.
Signalized intersection:
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), 44" St., Sunshine Blvd., Coronado Pkwy.,
Tropicana Blvd., 50th St. S.W., 53rd St., Santa Barbara Blvd.
Curbing:
The medians are curbed with mountable type "A" curbing.
Median Description:
There exist 1.9 miles of median green area. The medians are completely
landscaped and irrigated. The medians range in width from 10 feet to 38
feet ( + / -) at the widest points.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The north and south sides have grassed utility strips, 5 foot wide asphalt
and /or concrete sidewalks and then a grassed swale adjacent to the
right -of -way lines.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road
identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There is overhead electric transmission lines running along the right -of-
way lines. There exist electric underground and over head lines within
the medians that service the street lights located in the medians.
Roadway lighting:
The western portion of the roadway has street lights along the
right -of -way lines. The eastern portion has double headed street
lights located within the medians. The lights are standard cobra
head fixtures mounted on concrete poles.
Pedestrian walkways:
There are 5 foot wide asphalt and /or concrete sidewalks along the north
and south rights -of -way.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
The properties on the eastern half of the roadway from Sunshine
Blvd. to Collier Blvd. is about 98% developed with multi - family and
duplex residential along both sides of the roadway. Commercial
development occurs within the last block adjacent to C.R. 951.
The western half of the roadway is about 90% developed with
highway commercial and shopping center complexes. The
remaining properties are undeveloped, but zoned for commercial uses.
Landscape Development:
The median landscape and irrigation is complete.
3 -11
Packet Page -1383-
03/1997
03/2011
H
O
C
d
d
H
w o
N �
x
r•
n
M
to
H
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
rc,-nr-L ragc -i.av -r-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
3 -13
Packet Page -1385-
03/1997
03/2011
Roadway #4
Green Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) to Logan Blvd. & Santa Barbara Blvd. North Intersection)
Roadway descriptions:
A 2 mile roadway running east and west within a 100
foot wide road right -of -way easement. The eastern portion from
Collier Blvd. to Sunshine Blvd. is an uncurbed divided four lane
roadway. The western portion from Sunshine Blvd. or the bridge to
Logan Blvd. is an uncurbed two lane roadway. The western two lane
portion is offset to the north side of the right -of -way easement.
The posted speed limit is 40 MPH. This road is a County arterial /
collector roadway along the north boundary of the Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Signalized intersection:
Santa Barbara Blvd. North, Sunshine & Collier Blvd.
Curbing:
The first median at the intersection with Collier Blvd. is curbed with
Type "D" concrete curb. The remaining medians are only curbed on
the noses with type "D" curb at the median openings.
Median Description:
There exist .90 miles of median green area divided into 5 medians.
within the eastern half of the roadway. The medians are grassed
and generally level with the pavement. The medians have a typical
width of 19' -6" ( + / -). The western half of the roadway has no
medians.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are typical grassed shoulders sloped down into a swale
system adjacent to the right -of -way lines.
n Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
Overhead electric transmission lines run down the northern right -
of -way line about 95% of the roadway length.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway only at
the intersections with other roadways.
Pedestrian walkways:
From Collier Blvd. to Sunshine Blvd. there is a in road striped pedestrian
area along the south and north side of the road. From Sunshine Blvd. to
Santa Barbara Blvd. there is a 5 to 6 foot wide asphalt and concrete
sidewalk along the south right -of -way line.
Bike pathways:
Designated in- street, 7 -8 foot wide asphalt facility on
both sides of the four lane eastern portions of the roadway.
Designated off - street, 5 to 6 foot wide facility shared with
pedestrians along the eastern two lane portion.
Roadside Development:
The property along the north side of the roadway is zoned Estates
District. The properties along the south side of the roadway are over 50%
developed with multi - family residential units. The properties on the north
and south sides of the roadway are zoned commercial between Collier
Blvd. to 40th Ter. SW, but only the south side is developed.
3 -13
Packet Page -1385-
03/1997
03/2011
H
Co
H
H
x
H
O
d
d
H
W
N
� I
tv
x
w
H
ro
0
H
M
rr]
r•
n
m
M
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1386-
x
H
Ia
H
H
z
c�
H
O
d
d
H
W
I
N
Cn
s�J
V•
tv
z
w
r
H
ro
0
x
H
H
'TJ
n
c�
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #5
Hunter Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Coronado Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd., North) n
Roadway descriptions:
A .90 mile roadway running northeast and southwest within a 106
foot wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a mostly
uncurbed divided four lane roadway. The posted speed limit
is 25 MPH. This road is a minor County collector roadway.
Signalized intersection:
West end at Santa Barbara Blvd., North
Curbing:
The medians are uncurbed.
Median Description:
There exist .84 miles of median green area divided into 11
medians. The medians are grassed and generally level with the
pavement or curb. The medians range in width from 8 -9 feet at
turn lane locations to 19' -6" ( + / -) at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The side rights -of -ways are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage
swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines along
the roadway. Underground electric is present within some medians
supplying the street lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole.
Pedestrian walkways:
There exist a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and north sides of the
roadway.
Bike pathways:
Two lane roadway in -road striped bike paths along both sides of the
roadway.
Roadside Development:
Along the northeastern right -of -way line starting at the intersection with
Coronado Parkway is 90% developed with single family or duplex
residences. Between 55th Ave. SW and Santa Barbara Blvd. North the
properties are developed with office and commercial facilities. The
southwestern side of the roadway is developed to the extent and with
same types of developments as the northeastern side.
3 -16 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1388-
w
i
n
c�
H
H
H
z
c�
H
O
d
d
H
t
En
H
w
r
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1389-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #6
Santa Barbara Blvd., North Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions: A 2.1 mile roadway running north and south along the west boundary of
the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U. There are 2 bridges over the
Green and Golden Gate Canals. The northern portion north of Coronado
Blvd. is a mostly uncurbed divided four lane roadway. The southern
portion (4,270 In. ft. +/- north of the Golden Gate Canal) is an improved 6
lane major arterial roadway with Type F curbing. The posted speed limit
is 45 MPH. This roadway is a major County, Community and Golden
Gate M.S.T.U. arterial roadway.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway & Green Blvd. (Golden Gate Parkway intersection
Landscape Development: The future landscape development of this section of roadway is
listed to be implemented under the Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan. As of May 2009 the Collier County
Beautification Master Plan has this roadway unfunded.
3 -18 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1390-
is designated a major intersection per the 1988 "Corridor Management
Study ")
Curbing:
The northern portion medians are generally uncurbed, except for the last
4 medians north and south of the Green canal bridge with mountable
type "A" curb. The outside lanes between 18th Ave. SW and Green Blvd.
are curbed with vertical type "F" curb. The 8 medians and outside lanes
of the southern portion have Type F curbing.
Median Description:
There exist 1 mile of median green areas divided into 21 medians. The
northern 13.5 medians are grassed, uncurbed and level with the
pavement. The medians range in width from 7 feet to 18 feet. The
southern 7.5 medians are curbed, filled and grassed. The southern
portion medians contain 73,669 sq. ft. +/- of green median area.
Side Rights -of -Way:
Both sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consists of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on standard metal and /or 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are overhead electric transmission lines crossing and along the
west right -of -way line.
Roadway lighting:
The northern portion has no street lights continuously along the roadway.
The southern portion has street lights.
Pedestrian walkways:
The northern 6,764 In. ft. +/- of the roadway has existing in -road and off
road sidewalk facilities along the east side of the roadway. The southern
4,270 In. ft. +/- of roadway has concrete sidewalks along both sides.
Bike pathways:
The northern 6,764 In. ft. +/- of the roadway has one in -road facility along
the east side. The southern improved 6 lanes has in -road bike lanes.
Roadside Development:
The property along the west side of the roadway is generally zoned
Estates District and is about 25% developed with single family
residences. South of Golden Gate Parkway the properties are 50%
developed with private schools and church facilities. The remaining
properties are undeveloped. The east side of the roadway is developed
with a mix of commercial and multi - family properties.
Landscape Development: The future landscape development of this section of roadway is
listed to be implemented under the Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan. As of May 2009 the Collier County
Beautification Master Plan has this roadway unfunded.
3 -18 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1390-
W
I
N
N•
s✓
n
m
OEM
H
d
H
d
d
H
I
Cn
r
z
0
H
r
n
C
I
H
1C
h
C
C
(D
Q
V.
N
k
r
a
m
5
ro
ri
O
(7)
0
R.
m
a
m
n
w
w
rt
O
n
0
n
0
a
0
ro
x
E
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Packet Page -1391-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #7
Sunshine Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East to Green Blvd.)
Roadway descriptions: A 1.1 mile roadway running north and south within a 106
foot wide right -of -way easement. The northern most 850 feet
of the roadway is a typical asphalt pavement two lane road
off set to the east side of the right -of -way easement. There is a
two lane bridge in this most northern segment crossing the Green
Canal. The remainder of the road is a mostly uncurbed divided four
lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. This road is a
County north /south, collector roadway bisecting the northern half of
Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway and Green Blvd.
Curbing: The median south of the Green canal are curbed with six inch
ht. vertical type "D" concrete curb.
Median Description: There exist .78 miles of median green area divided into six
medians. The medians have landscaping and irrigation improvements.
The medians range in width from 7 feet at turn lane locations to 18 feet
at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines running along the n
roadway, but overhead lines do cross the roadway. Underground electric
is present within some medians.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway, only at
the intersections with other roadways. The street light fixtures
are located in the medians and are double standard street lights
mounted on top of a concrete pole. Decorative accent pedestrian lighting
Is existing at the ends of all medians.
Pedestrian walkways:
There is 5 foot wide sidewalks along the east and west rights -of -way
running from Golden Gate Parkway to 17th Avenue S.W. From 17th
Avenue S.W. to Green Blvd. the sidewalk is only along the east side of
the roadway. Pedestrian street crossings are marked.
Bike pathways:
Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians.
Roadside Development:
The property along both sides of the roadway is developed with multi-
family duplexes and apartments. The remaining properties are single
family homes or vacant properties. The Golden Gate Community Center
property is located at the N.W. corner with Golden Gate Parkway.
Traffic Calming:
In -road asphalt speed humps have been installed within the 20th Place
S.W. intersection at the school crossing.
Landscape Development:
Median landscape, irrigation and lighting improvements were
completed in 2007.
3 -20 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1392-
W
I
N
N
n
0
H
YA
H
H
z
c�
H
d
d
H
YA
5N
7�
x
xH
r
0 a��G�r05G-iJ7J-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Roadway #8
Tropicana Blvd. Existing Conditions
(Golden Gate Parkway, East to 32nd Ave. SW.)
Roadway descriptions: A .80 mile roadway running north and south within road right -of -way
easement. There are two -2 lane bridges over the Tropicana Canal and a
bridge over the Golden Gate Canal for the entry into the high school. The
road is a curbed divided two lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 25
MPH. This road is a County north / south collector roadway bisecting the
southern half of Golden Gate M.S.T.U.
Signalized intersection: Golden Gate Parkway
Curbing:
All medians are curbed with six inch vertical type "D" concrete curbing.
Median Description:
There exist .70 miles of median green area divided into six medians. The
medians have landscaping, accent lighting and irrigation improvements.
The medians range in width from 7 feet at turn lane locations to 18 feet
at the widest locations.
Side Rights -of -Way:
The sides are grassed shoulders sloped into a drainage swale.
Roadway signage:
The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification
signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post.
Overhead utilities:
There are no overhead electric transmission lines running along
the roadway. Underground electric is present within medians
supplying the lights.
Roadway lighting:
There are no street lights continuously along the roadway. The existing
decorative light fixtures are located in the median ends
Pedestrian walkways:
There is 5 foot wide sidewalk along the east and west sides of the
roadway approximately 3 feet off the pavement.
Bike pathways:
Two lane roadway in -road striped bike paths along both sides of the
roadway.
Roadside Development:
The property along both sides of the roadway is single family or duplex
residences. The remaining properties are undeveloped. Located on the
northwest corner of the intersection with 32nd Ave. SW is a wastewater
treatment facility.
Landscape Development:
Median landscape, irrigation and lighting improvements were
completed in 2002.
3 -22
Packet Page -1394-
03/1997
03/2011
W
I
N
W
r•
G
n
M
M
H
H
H
z
0
H
d
d
H
N
H
O
to
H
n
Par "" , a5�
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
N%W."
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE RELATED CODES, ORDINANCES,
MASTER PLANS, GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
n
Collier County Government has enacted landscape codes,
ordinances, guidelines and standards related directly to
providing minimum requirements for landscaping within and along
County roadway corridors. See Section 8 for references and web
site locations.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN
The Master Plan was adopted on 04/22/2003 and addressed the
landscape improvements and maintenance for County four and six
lane arterial roadways as listed in the Master Plan. In May of
2009 the County Commission removed funding and updated standards
for improvements, which affects the Golden Gate Beautification
MSTU Master Plan roadways, Santa Barbara Blvd.(Golden Gate Canal
to Green Blvd.) and Green Blvd. (Sunshine Blvd. to Santa Barbara
Blvd). Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan
changes are as follows:
Recommended Policy:
Collier County Landscape Master Plan requires Type "B"
landscaping improvements on all 6 -lane arterials within the
urbanized area, budget permitting.
1. If a developer /MSTU /HOA desires to landscape a 6 -lane n
roadway that has not been landscaped due to budget
constraints and commits to improve the roadway to County
established Type "B" landscaping standards, the
developer /MSTU /HOA may do so at their own cost. The county
would assume the maintenance responsibilities subject to
Board approval. This condition would require the County to
evaluate its ability to fund ongoing maintenance and, as
such, final Board approval will be required for each
request.
2. If a developer /MSTU /HOA desires to landscape a 4 -lane
highway depicted in Attachment A, which is either at its
anticipated maximum lane configuration with no future plans
for expansion, or expansion is beyond the 5 -Year Capital
Impact Element (CIE), and commits to improve the roadway to
County established Type "B" landscaping standards, the
developer /MSTU /HOA may do so at their own cost. If future 6-
laning is identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP), any landscaping must be installed in a manner not to
conflict with the future expansion. The county would assume
the maintenance responsibilities subject to Board approval.
This condition would require the County to evaluate its
ability to fund ongoing maintenance and, as such, final
Board approval will be required for each request.
3 -24
Packet Page -1396-
03/1997, 03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
3. If a developer /MSTU /HOA wishes to improve County landscaping
level through the installation of street trees (Type C -1) or
through the installation of a buffer (Type C -2), the
developer /MSTU /HOA would pay 1000 of the additional plant
material and irrigation improvements and be required to
maintain the improvements since it exceeds the current
approved levels of a Type B. This condition would require
that the interested party enter into a landscape maintenance
agreement with Collier County. The request and the
landscape maintenance agreement would require Board approval
for each request.
The northern portion of Santa Barbara Blvd. north of the Golden
Gate Canal to the end of the existing curbed medians is ready for
landscape improvements compliant with the Collier County
Landscape Beautification Master Plan changes. The Golden Gate
MSTU has the opportunity to develop a project to provide the
landscape improvements for this six lane improved section of
Santa Barbara Blvd. (Approx. 4,270 ln. ft., 8- medians with 73,669
sq. ft. of green area). The remainder of Santa Barbara Blvd.
north from the end of the current existing six lane improved
medians to Green Blvd. should be considered for median landscape
improvements at a future date when the roadway improvements are
finalized and the medians are fully curbed.
COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT CODE
n Chapter 2.03.07 Corridor Management Overlay District
This Division affects the Golden Gate Parkway, West roadway
corridor. The minimum requirements call for a 25 foot wide buffer
area adjacent to the road right -of -way that retains 85 percent of
the existing native vegetation. The trees planted shall be
indigenous native species 8 foot in height and 30 feet on center.
These requirements apply to all zoning uses except for single
family homes in the Estates District.
Chapter 4.02.26 Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office
Commercial Overlay District (GGPPOCO)
Special Conditions for the Properties Abutting Golden Gate
Parkway East of Santa Barbara Boulevard as Referenced in the
Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District Map
(Map 2) of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan.
Landscaping
1. Projects shall provide a ten (10) foot buffer between
vehicular right -of -way and required sidewalk and shall
provide landscaping of one (1) shade tree per thirty (30)
linear feet. Such trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet
in height and one and one -half (11-�) inches in diameter at
the time of planting that shall have a minimum canopy of
3 -25
Packet Page -1397-
03/1997, 03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
fifteen (15) feet at maturity. In addition, a hedge or berm
planting combination shall be planted along the entire
length of this ten (10) foot buffer consistent with section
4.06.00.
2. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the gross vehicular use
area shall be landscaped to provide visual relief. One (1)
tree, as described in section 4.02.26 I.1., shall be
provided for each seventy -five (75) square feet of this
landscaped area. This landscaping shall be placed within the
vehicular use area.
Chapter 4.06, Landscaping, Buffering and Vegetation Retention
All commercial and multi - family projects abutting a roadway
corridor must comply with the most current landscaping and
buffering requirements.
Collier County Streetscape Master Plan
The Master plan addresses three arterial /collector roadways that
pass through the M.S.T.U. District. The roadways are C.R. 951
(undefined specific locations between S.R.84 and Golden Gate
Parkway), Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd. The Master
plan addresses all three roadways in a conceptual design manner,
but only list C.R. 951 in its 5 or 15 year Streetscape
Improvement Program.
Chapter 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Guidelines
and Standards for Commercial Buildings and Projects, Landscaping.
The Land Development Code provides for additional buffer area
widths adjacent to roadways, increases in tree heights to 12 -14
feet and natural shaping of water retention areas with additional
landscaping and features adjacent to the roadways.
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
This section of the Collier County Growth Management Plan has
landscape requirements related to roadway buffering in two of the
listed land use zoning categories. The "Golden Gate Professional
Office Commercial District" requirements have now been adopted
within the LDC Chapter 4.02.26. See above section for
requirements. The second category is the "Golden Gate Estates
Neighborhood Centers" which calls for a 25 foot wide buffer
between the abutting right -of -way and the off - street parking
area. This category only applies on the western corners of the
intersection of C.R. 951, North and Pine Ridge Road Extension,
East.
Public Rights -of -Way Construction Standards Ordinance 93 -64
This ordinance specifies roadway construction standards and
contains guidelines for roadway landscaping and irrigation. The
3-26
Packet Page -1398-
03/1997, 03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
ordinances list requirements for all County arterial and
collector roadways. The requirements cover plant setbacks,
heights, size, types and clear sight distances. Sidewalk and bike
path construction standards, including curb access with
physically handicapped or impaired ramps are also specified
within this ordinance. The ordinance also establishes the
permitting procedure and requirements for installing landscaping
within a road right -of -way.
Summary and Recommendations for County Codes
Based upon a review of the Land Development Code guidelines and
standards it is apparent there exist some inconsistent and
overlapping buffering and tree height requirements. It would be
recommended that Chapter 4.06 and Chapter 2.03.07 requirements be
combined so to provide for a 25 foot wide buffer with 12 -14 foot
height trees planted 30 foot on center be applied to adjacent
properties along most of the area roadways within the Golden Gate
Community Master Plan project area.
Developments along Golden Gate Parkway, East and C.R. 951, North
to Green Boulevard should be exempted from the 25 foot buffer
requirement due to the large amount of existing development. The
existing Land Development Code Chapters 4.06 and 5.05.08
requirements will apply to these areas. The C.R. 951, Collier
Blvd. corridor from Davis Blvd. northward is currently under
planning for improvement to a six lane roadway.
The County landscape buffer requirements in place presently
ensure for a landscape buffer area ranging from 10 to 25 feet in
width be retained or created along the roadway of commercial or
multi - family developed adjacent properties.
All the roadway corridor right -of -way easements within the
project study area range in width from 106 to 130 feet. Based
upon this the minimum landscape buffer width on adjacent
properties throughout the project study area would be 15 feet.
As stated in the Collier County Streetscape Master plan
methodology, out - lying communities with their own landscape
programs are not included. It would be best to continue this
exclusion and proceed with the existing M.S.T.U. District
program. The exception to this exclusion is that the
Beautification Advisory Committee, as well as the Golden Gate
Community should public petition annually the Board of County
Commissioners to have all the Golden Gate Community roadways
added to the 5 and 15 year Collier County Streetscape Master Plan
improvement programs to provide funding of roadway landscape
improvements.
The existing County Land Development Code provides for penalties
and fines for property owners who do not maintain the Code
required landscape buffer plantings. A review of the roadways
3 -27
Packet Page -1399-
03/1997, 03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
within the project study area revealed that 50 percent or more of
the developed properties required to install and maintain County
Code landscape buffer plantings were not present or in a healthy
condition as called for by the Codes. Due to the amount of work
and limited personnel the County Code Enforcement Division has
not been able to bring the problem under control and additional
help is needed. It would be suggested that the Beautification
Advisory Committee assist in this effort and write letters to the
property owners in violation of the Codes and inform them of the
Community beautification efforts, as well as offer assistance in
the form of direction, knowledge or expertise.
The M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee on a continuous basis should
monitor and be allowed to provide a courtesy non - binding pre -
approval review of the "Land Development Code" (LDC) Site
Development Plan (SDP) submittals for projects located along the
arterial and collector roadways within the M.S.T.U. district.
These types of reviews have occurred in the past and can result
in the development of a private /public partnership for roadway
beautification. There will be no obligation for Land Development
Services to withhold approval of an SDP with or without the
approval from the MSTU Committee.
Existing Pedestrian and Roadway Lighting
Pedestrian scale accent or safety lighting was virtually none
existent prior to the implementation of this Master plan.
Presently Tropicana Blvd. and Sunshine Blvd. have the pedestrian
accent lighting installed on the median ends. The pedestrian
accent lighting fixtures provide additional lighting for
pedestrians and vehicles. The internal collector roadways of
Coronado Parkway, Green Blvd., Hunter Blvd., Sunshine Blvd., and
Tropicana Blvd. are not properly lit per the F.D.O.T. State
standard of providing a 1.3 average foot candle level of light
along the roadway.
These roadways only have streetlight twin fixtures within the medians
located at intersecting roads. The light levels at these locations
appear to meet the state standard. The only roadway that appears to
have the proper light levels is C.R. 951, South, Part "B" from Golden
Gate Parkway, East to Green Blvd.
Existing Pedestrian Walkways and Bike Pathways
C.R. 951, South, Part "B ", Green Blvd., Golden Gate Parkway,
Sunshine Blvd., Coronado Pkwy. and Tropicana Blvd. have asphalt
and /or concrete, off -road and in -road shared facilities.
Community Gateway and Entry Roadway Signage
Existing Community Entry Signage
n
Located at the west end of the Golden Gate Parkway, East roadway
3 -28 03/1997, 03/2011
Packet Page -1400-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
is a Community entry signs that was part of the Golden Gate
Parkway Beautification project. This sign was paid for and
n donated to the Beautification M.S.T.0 by local organizations.
This type of public / private partnership should be encouraged
for future signs. It would be recommended to adopt this existing
sign format as the Community wide entry or boundary signage and
incorporate this type of sign into other roadway beautification
projects (See Figure 12).
Existing Roadway Traffic Control Si na e
The Community roadway traffic signage is standard type painted
metal signs mounted on galvanized poles or 4" x 4" wood posts.
These signs include the stop signs, road name signs, speed limit
signs and general traffic directional signs. This type of signage
provides for no coherency or coordination to the community image.
Roadway Beautification Attitude Survey
A Golden Gate Community wide attitude survey about roadway
beautification was developed and distributed to the community
residents. A total of 34 responses were returned. The survey was
an attempt to involve the community into the planning process.
Even with the low number of responses the survey results provided
information the Advisory Committee felt was important in their
decision making process.
3 -29
Packet Page -1401-
03/1997, 03/2011
w
i
0
F-
Ili
n
0
N•
fi
l�
K
0
0
P)
P.
a
N•
tQ
a
tQ
M
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
F Ga.ncL. r agc
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 4
TYPICAL BEAUTIFICATION PLAN CONCEPTS FOR ROADWAYS
The Advisory Committee during its public meetings decided
earlier on that the Master Plan efforts would be directed to
roadways located within the Beautification M.S.T.U. boundaries
due to funding concerns. The other community roadways outside
the M.S.T.U. as listed in the plan will be addressed in a
written conceptual form. The Committee realized roadways outside
of the District are important because of their inter Community
connection as feeder roads to the Beautification M.S.T.U.
District. Implementation of the following landscape concepts on
uncurbed roadways will require approval from the Collier County
Transportation Services Director.
The proposed landscape plan concepts were developed to provide
for the most flexible means in which to perform roadway
landscape beautification in regard to budgeting and phasing.
These beautification landscape plan concepts were also developed
in order to try and solve two major concerns associated with
roadway landscape improvements. The first major concern is the
County's requirement to install curbing around the median before
landscaping is installed. The curbing serves two purposes. One
is to act as a barrier to protect the plant material and
irrigation sprinkler heads and the other is to stop undesignated
median crossovers by motorists. The second major concern with
the curbing is the cost of installation. Curbing costs are
typically greater than 50 percent of the total cost of roadway
landscape improvements. In an attempt to address these major
concerns an undulating berm and retention area grading concept
was developed. This grading concept would physically attempt to
deter motorists from crossing the medians. The grading in
conjunction with the plant material would visually deter the
motorist to stay away and off the medians. This concept also
provides an additional visual relief from the flat horizontal
medians that exist throughout the Golden Gate Community
roadways. The finished grade and plant placement on uncurbed
medians must take into account the future installation of
curbing as funds permit. Uncurbed medians with a width 14 feet
or less will require an approval for canopy trees or palms to be
place in the center of the medians.
The concept of planting trees along the side of the roads
without outside curbed lanes can only occur if a special
exception is granted by the Transportation Services Director per
Ordinance 93 -64. This is because of the set speed limit on the
4 -1
Packet Page -1403-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
roadways is over 30 MPH requiring a minimum tree setback along
the right -of ways of 25 foot from the edge of pavement. If the
trees were planted to this setback the trees would be on or
beyond the right -of -way lines. All of the roadways within the
M.S.T.U., except for Collier Blvd. (C.R.951), both the north and
south sections, have no curbing on the outside lanes.
The uncurbed median concepts are based on the medians not being
irrigated or irrigated by a tanker.
Proper tree selection for tree plantings along or within the
rights -of -way should be guided by Florida Power & Light's "Plant
the RIGHT TREE in the RIGTH PLACE" south Florida edition.
UNCURBED 14 FEET OR WIDER AND CURBED 20 FEET OR WIDER
MEDIANS
Typically most of the uncurbed median within the Master Plan
roadways are 18 feet or greater in width, except at the turn
lane locations. Curbed medians typically range from 15 to 38
( + / -) feet wide. Curbed medians wider than 20 feet have four
inch height mountable type curb and medians under 20 feet have
six inch height vertical face curbs. Proposed future curbing
installed on medians 20 feet or less in width should be six inch
vertical face F.D.O.T. Type "D" or Type "F" curb depending on
n
the road drainage pattern.
Any of the following proposed typical type landscape planting
plan concepts can also be implemented on roadways with existing
curb around the medians and /or along the outside travel lanes.
Type T1 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference Drawing T1)
Type T1 is a median only installation of canopy trees or palms
installed on a typical 50 foot center with shrubs beds planted
at the base of the trees. The trees are to be placed in the
grade transition area between the berm and retention area to
help prevent motorist from crossing the median at location other
than designated median openings. The Type Tl concept is
basically considered a roadway median tree planting program.
Type T2 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference Drawing T2)
Type T2 is a combination of Type T1 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
n
4 -2
Packet Page -1404-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs. This Type T2
concept is an entire roadway tree planting program.
Type T3 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference Drawing T3)
Type T3 is a median only planting plan. It utilizes low growing
ground covers or turf on top of the berms and at the median ends
medium height shrubs within the retention areas. The plant
material located within the retention or low areas should be
wetland or water tolerant type plants and the plants on top of
the berms should be upland or more drought tolerant.
Type T4 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference Drawing T4)
Type T4 is a combination of Type T3 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs.
CURBED MEDIANS 8 TO 20 FOOT WIDTH
The following landscape concepts are not cost effective in
medians wider than 20 feet and should be only implemented in the
center of the medians on roads expected to receive additional
traffic lanes.
Type T5 Typical Landscape Concept (Reference Drawing T5)
Type T5 is a median only planting with no turf areas.
Type T6 (Reference Drawing T6)
Type T6 is a combination of Type T5 with additional canopy
and /or palm trees planted in the unpaved areas within and
adjacent to the right -of -way lines per the County setback
requirements. The trees shown along the sides are typically
placed 50 feet on center and 10 to 20 feet off the edge of
pavement or 6 to 20 feet off the back of curbs.
CURBED 8 TO 6 FOOT OR LESS MEDIANS OR SEPARATORS
Curbed medians 8 to 6 feet or less in width or typically medians
at turn lane locations should be paved with decorative
interlocking pavers. This would also include the existing solid
concrete separator medians at turn lane locations.
4 -3
Packet Page -1405-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
UNCURBED ROADS: IN -ROAD PATHWAYS FACILITY CONCEPTS
In an attempt to reduce the overall landscape installation and
maintenance cost, as well as improve pedestrian /bicycle pathway
facilities, the following two in -road pathway concepts are
recommended. The first concept is the "Four lane road in -road
Facility" concept requiring a two foot wide strip of pavement be
added to the inside lanes reducing the median width to 14 foot
( + / -). The road pavement would then be restriped to provide for
two 10 foot traffic lanes and a 4.5 foot wide in -road pathway
facility on each side (See Figure 13). The second concept is a
"Two lane road in -road Facility" concept requiring the road to
be restriped to one 14 foot traffic lane and one 8 foot wide in-
road pathway facilities on each side (See Figure 14). With both
these concepts an additional pedestrian path on one side of the
roadway would be recommended to provide for the safest
pedestrian circulation. The overall maintenance of these
facilities as listed above should be less from both a repair and
landscape cost point of view.
The following M.S.T.U. internal collector roadways would be
recommended for the "Two lane road in -road Facility" concept:
Roadway Name
Hunter Boulevard
Sunshine Boulevard
Tropicana Boulevard
and the following County major arterial roadways for the "Four
lane road in -road Facility" concept:
Coronado Parkway
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
RECOMMENDED BEAUTIFICATION CONCEPTS FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION M.S.T.U.
ARTERIAL /COLLECTOR ROADWAYS
1. Coronado Parkway
Landscape: Type T1 or T5, T5 to be installed in 2011.
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install twin headed
decorative streetlight fixture within the
medians on 200( + / -) foot centers.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways: Four lane road in -road Facility concept
along with existing 5 foot wide off -road
n
4 -4 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1406-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
facilities located along the south and north
n rights-of-way g y (See Figure 13).
2. Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), South
Part "A" (Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway)
Landscape:
Type T1, T5 or T6, Type T5 Completed
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200 foot( + / -)
roadway spaced triangularly on 200( + / -) foot
centers
centers.
Signage:
Install a Community "Welcome to Golden Gate"
control signs. Community "Welcome to Golden
entry sign in the west right -of -way area
Gate" entry sign on west end. Completed
just north of the Golden Gate Canal bridge.
Install an off -road 5 foot wide facility
Install decorative street name and traffic
along the south right -of -way area to make a
control signs. Completed
Pathways:
8 foot wide off -road facility along west
Project Completed.
right -of -way area.
Part "B" (Golden Gate Parkway to Green Boulevard)
Landscape:
Type T1, T3 or T4,
Type T3 /T5 combined, Project Completed.
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings and replace existing
streetlight fixtures with decorative poles
and fixtures.
Signage:
Install a Community "Welcome to Golden Gate"
entry sign on the N.W. corner of Green Blvd.
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. Completed
Pathways:
Existing facility
3. Golden Gate Parkway, East
Landscape:
Existing, Type T3 /T5 combined, Completed
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200 foot( + / -)
centers
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. Community "Welcome to Golden
Gate" entry sign on west end. Completed
Pathways:
Install an off -road 5 foot wide facility
along the south right -of -way area to make a
continuous connection along the roadway.
Project Completed.
4 -5
Packet Page -1407-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
4. Green Boulevard
Landscape:
Type Tl or T6 on the eastern four lane
section and continue the side right -of -way
areas trees along the western two lane
section.
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
streetlight fixtures within the medians on
the eastern half and along the southern edge
of pavement on the western half spaced
200( + / -) foot on center.
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways:
Existing facility
5. Hunter Boulevard
Landscape Type T1 or T5, T5 to be installed in 2011.
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures as specified in the Master Plan
within the medians spaced 200( + / -) foot on
center.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs. n
Pathways: Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with a 5 foot wide pedestrian facility along
the southwestern right -of -way.
(See Figure 14). Project Completed.
6. Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
Landscape: Type T1, T5 or T6
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Install decorative
streetlight fixture on both sides of the
roadway spaced triangularly on 200( + / -) foot
centers.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways: Install a 5 foot wide off -road facility
along both sides of the roadway.
7. Sunshine Boulevard
Landscape: Type Tl or T5, Type T3 /T5 combined, Project
Completed.
Lighting: Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures within the medians spaced 200( + / -)
n
4 -6 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1408-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
foot on center. Pedestrian fixtures at
median ends completed.
Signage: Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways: Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with existing off -road pedestrian facility
along the east right -of -way (See Figure 14).
8. Tropicana Boulevard
Landscape:
Type Tl or T5, Type T3 /T5 combined, Project
Completed.
Lighting:
Pedestrian fixtures at main intersections or
pedestrian crossings. Decorative twin headed
fixtures within the medians spaced 200( + / -)
foot on center. Pedestrian fixtures at
median ends completed.
Signage:
Install decorative street name and traffic
control signs.
Pathways:
Two lane road in -road Facility concept along
with existing off -road pedestrian facility
along the west right -of -way (See Figure 14).
Project Completed.
Summary
The Beautification M.S.T.U. District roadways numbers one
through eight landscape concepts were selected based on low
annual landscape maintenance cost. The selection will provide,
upon completion of the landscape improvements, the estimated
lowest annual total landscape maintenance costs. The Type T1 and
T5 landscape planting concepts will require the least annual
landscape maintenance costs.
4 -7
Packet Page -1409-
03/1997
03/2011
•
•
•
25
•
•
H
Z
W
f
W
N
Q
W
p
Q
O
N'
zO
0
M /21
M/S
w
W
m
J
M A
2 W
00
y
WLO
J
� 3
I vJ
H
N
N
H
W
D
O. 1�
H
F-
~ W
N Q
N d
� I
IA W
'F A
� Q
D W
2 y
h 0
aiJ ¢
W
J
3
y
M /21
IJ
ZY
N
�D3
W Z Z
¢�Z
r
A
A
►¢i
IXAQ
pGJ
94
J
a. a.
XWW
►� J
W N
W U
0 LL.
N J
WZZ
N
LLI
DH
0=
t4
I--
aoa
CL A
i
n�.aa
I
O
F-
Z
W
f
W
Q
W
A
Q
0
w
zO
0
M/S
ail W
N
Q
W Z Z
y
O
}
y C3 !j
~ W
N
IXAQ
pGJ
94
J
a. a.
W¢
L`
¢ ¢
Lai M
o
CL W
F a V1
0.. PC1
yaW
A
ELI
x W LLI
W ft- a.
i
M/S
ail W
A
LLI J
ao
y
y
M
� I
H
4
In
C?
4
H
W
CD
aJ
H
4
U �I
►r
L�
� LL.
¢J
I--
N
-T
�i Q
A
ELI
ao �1
i
N
T
O
1
L)
W
oLL.Z
J
Ci0
IX
N
U
U
d
0-4
LL. LLI
Z
.ti
NJ
N
of W
A
c C3
H y
i
A'
n
I J
Y
0 Z J
0 0 Q
� F-
qIL
Z O Z
�w�
Z
o v)
�a- w
O q
X Q� W
W CL 0-
M /N
A
Q
0
zr
I �
Z
�r J
IM U
W Q
N W
O q
0- W W
fL p0 aT
A
Q
Z Y Z F
Q J
Q (L W c�
¢q°< 0�
LD w&� ow
�dw aoa
xW°w V
wCL CL
M/8
an w
a
W J
J :)
Q O
3z
(4 N
in
ao F-
L)
L�
W W
Z
fy- Q
F-- J
CL
r
zZ
+v,ra
w
p W x
U
L�
W W
Q Z
�Q
F J
0o ~
a
Im
ca W
A
W J
J
¢o
3s
■
•
w
rn
I
ri
�i
N
to
m
CL4�
N
U
d
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 5
ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION
PLAN ELEMENTS AND DESIGN STANDARDS
The goal of these plan elements and design standards is to
provide for a feasible, economical, safe, more pedestrian
friendly and aesthetically pleasing roadway system for the
residents and motorists. These elements and standards are to be
guides for preparing the final design and installation plans.
The Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee and the Collier
County Government will need to continue in their public /private
partnership in the planning, funding, design and maintenance of
future M.S.T.U. roadway beautification projects. It is
recommended that in the final design phase of future projects
that a Florida Registered Landscape Architect be involved in the
process.
The following will be a list of items to be considered and /or
incorporated into final design plans:
Community colors
The community colors are to be forest green and cream. The forest
green is to be equivalent to Tiger Drylac® powder coating color
Ral 6016 and the cream equivalent to Sherman Williams exterior
Gentry cream SW2332. The community colors are to be utilized
singularly or in combination on site furnishing and fixtures such
as benches, traffic control signage and decorative light
fixtures.
Sight Distance
For required sight distances for landscaping in medians at median
crossover locations and at roadway intersections (See F.D.O.T.
"Design Standards" Index 546). For roadways with posted 25 MPH
speeds refer to F.D.O.T. "Manual of Minimum standards for Design,
Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways" as a
reference standard.
Sight Window
For required vertical sight window areas that must be kept clear
of foliage that can block a motorists view (See F.D.O.T. "Design
Standards" Index 546).
Pedestrian / Bicycle Pathway Facilities
On many of the M.S.T.U. roadways, the pathway facilities are non-
existent along both sides of the roadway or are not continuous
5 -1 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1412-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
along the roadways. Refer to the Pedestrian /Bicycle Facilities
Map for location of existing and proposed facilities within the
M.S.T.U. roadway corridors.
The installation of proposed pathway facilities should be
planned and be included in future roadway beautification
projects. Coordination with the Naples (Collier County)
Metropolitan Planning Organization Pathways Work Program and
Advisory Committee will provide assistance and possible funding
for pathways.
Pathways Facility Design Standards:
Due to the large amount of lineal feet and overall lack of
facilities within the M.S.T.U. roadways it is recommended to use
concrete facilities. The implementation of the In -road Pathways
Pavement Concepts" would shorten the time frame of installation.
Installation should be incorporated, budgeted and scheduled with
Collier County road resurfacing plans and schedules.
The minimum width of a concrete one wa
facility should be 5 feet. The minimum
concrete facility should be 8 feet.
Pedestrian Crosswalk Marking
pedestrian /bicycle
width of a two way
Pedestrian crosswalk locations should be marked. Refer to the
"Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways" current edition for crosswalk markings. Crosswalk
markings with longitudinal lines is recommended for added
visibility. Surface applied reflective white brick pattern
surfacing should be considered as an alternate to painted white
bars. Sidewalk curb ramps at all streets or large commercial
driveways crossings shall have embedded domed warning surfaces
per F.D.O.T. "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards" Indexes.
Warning surfaces shall be a contrasting earth tone (i.e. clay
brick) color to the paved surface.
Curbing
Median curbing shall be concrete (6) six inch vertical face Type
"F" or "D" curb per F.D.O.T "Roadway and Traffic Design
Standards" Index #300, most current edition.
Decorative Paving
Medians 6 feet or under in width, concrete separators, and
medians adjacent to turn lane stack areas shall be paved with
decorative concrete interlocking pavers (See Figure 16).
The paver pattern shall simulate a cobblestone pattern made up of
5 -2 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1413-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
a mix of three different paver sizes and colors. The colors shall
be dark emerald green, medium green and cream. The percentage
ratio for each paver color shall be one third. Existing
installations should be reviewed in order to match colors.
Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting
Roadway: There shall be two types of roadway /street lighting
recommended for the M.S.T.U.
Golden Gate Master Plan "Special Overlay District"
Pole & Fixture: Collier County Traffic Operations
"East Trail Street Light Assembly"
(Lumec 250 watt metal halide, DMS30
LMS11684A, Type A), Drawing No. CCTO 03 -204
M.S.T.U. Roadways
Pole: Green toned exposed aggregate round pole anchor based
or embedded, topped with a single or double 6 foot
fixture arm, color forest Green.
Fixture: Lumec Helios series H.B.M., forest green Color, or
approved equal.
F.D.O.T. minimum average light levels of 1.5 initial foot candles
along the road shall be maintained.
The pedestrian lighting shall be a decorative pedestrian scaled
pole and fixture. The color shall be one or a combination of the
community colors. These fixtures are to be located at major
intersection corners, median ends and pedestrian crosswalks.
These fixtures are to provide daytime accent and additional night
time safety lighting.
Decorative Pedestrian Accent Lighting
Pole: Lumec, Inc. AM6U- 16- GN6 -TX 16 foot ht. pole with base
cover or approved equal.
Arm: VR 302 -1A- GN6 -TX
Fixture: Lumec, Inc #175SMH- DMS50- SG3- LD- QTA240 or approved
equal.
Soil Analysis and Preparation
Prior to planning and design of any future projects it is
recommended that test borings be performed in the road medians.
The existing soil within the medians shall be removed to a depth
of 8 to 12 inches minimum; or to a depth to remove any limestone
or construction debris. The areas shall then be filled with a
specified soil mix or with a local clean sandy loam top soil. The
ph level of the soil should be within the ranges of 5.5 to 6.8. n
5 -3
Packet Page -1414-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
If local top soils are used or existing soil is to be amended, it
is recommended that 25 to 50 percent by volume of sewage sludge
be incorporated into the soil. The Collier County Wastewater
Treatment Facilities produce, and can provide, the sewage sludge.
Water management polymers and wetting agents should be
incorporated in the soil per Manufacturers specifications.
Site Furnishings and Fixtures
Benches: Wausau TileTM Model TF5047 with cream
weatherstone concrete supports and forest
green colored recycled plastic seats and
backing or approved equal.
Trash receptacles: Wausau TileTM precast Model A, TF1205, cream
weatherstone finish with forest green plastic
arch lid or approved equal.
Bike Rack:
Six cycle tubular loop rack with in- ground
mount. The color shall be forest green.
Street Identity and Traffic Control Signage
Typical existing standard metal roadway street name or traffic
control signs shall be mounted on a wood backing and then framed
and mounted on a decorative post system. The posts and frames
shall be cream colored and the bands and sign backing or
highlighted objects shall be forest green. The support posts for
all stop signs, large traffic control or informational and street
identity signs or combination of shall be a 6" x 6" square post
(See Figure 15).
Landscape Sight Distance and Sight Windows
The landscape plantings must comply with the sight distance and
sight window details (See Figures 18A and 18B). These details
graphically depict the clear sight requirements as set forth in
1997 edition of Collier County Ordinance 93 -64 and the
"Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public
Right -of -Way" and as detailed in this plan. The details establish
minimum tree setbacks, clear sight zones, and plant and canopy
height requirements. Limit of clear sight zones shall be
increased or adjusted at horizontal curve locations so to provide
for the greatest clear sight zone possible.
Major Intersections
Special landscape improvements should be implemented at major
intersections in order to establish a pronounced entry into the
Community. Major intersections would be defined as signalized or
5 -4 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1415-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
un- signalized intersections where two major County arterial
roadways intersect. The intersections within the M.S.T.U. which
would be considered major are the Golden Gate Parkway, East and
Santa Barbara Blvd., North intersection, Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951)
at Green Blvd. and Golden Gate Parkway intersection and the Santa
Barbara Blvd., North and Green Blvd. intersection.
Major intersections should receive the following type
improvements:
1. International pedestrian crosswalk markings of solid white
bars.
2. Decorative street and pedestrian lighting fixtures.
3. Decorative street name, traffic control and Community entry
signage.
4. Decorative mast arm traffic signal control pole systems
5. Site furnishing: Benches, trash containers and bike racks.
6. Pedestrian safe areas in medians and at corners delineated
with decorative paving.
The Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Blvd., intersection is
listed in the County approved 1988 "Corridor Management Study" as
a major intersection per the study.
LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
The intent of these landscape design standards are to provide for
the safety of motorists and pedestrians while creating a thriving
urban landscape within the M.S.T.U. roadways. The general
planting concept for all roadways will be to utilize native plant
species and naturalized accent plants to try and restore a
planting image based upon the upland pine forest vegetation
community, (Refer to Drawings T1 through T6 Appendix A). Roadway
streetscape improvements will be guided by the "Collier County
Landscape and Irrigation Specifications for Beautification
Improvements within the Public Right -of- way." most current
edition. A pre- design meeting and an on -site review with the
Collier County Transportation staff is recommended.
The median widths listed below refer to the inside of curbing or
planting area.
Curbed 8 to 6 feet wide or less medians /separators
These type medians shall be paved with decorative interlocking
pavers as specified and as funding permits per "Curbed Turn Lane
& Decorative Paving Detail" (See Figure 16).
Uncurbed 8 to 6 feet wide or less medians
These medians shall be bermed per " Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm
5 -5 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1416-
n
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Detail" (See Figure 17).
Curbed 20 to 8 foot wide medians
These type medians shall be landscaped with plants and /or
decorative pavers only. No turf grasses.
Uncurbed 14 feet or wider or curbed 20 feet or wider medians
These type medians will typically contain turf and shall be
landscaped per the "Typical Roadway Landscape Plans" Type T1, T2,
T3 or T4, (Refer to drawings Tl through T4 Appendix A) and
" Uncurbed Turn Lane & Berm Detail ", (See Figure 17).
Existing or Proposed Curbed Roadways
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) South, Part "A"
(G.G. Canal to G.G. Pkwy.)
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T5, medians planted with
no turf.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing vertical face curb around
medians and along outside lanes.
This segment of roadway should be treated as a major entry or
gateway road into the community. The planting design should have
a mature and dramatic appearance to create an entrance.
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) South, Part "B"
(G.G. Pkwy. to Green Blvd.)
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T3, center of medians
planted with 18' wide beds spaced
between 100 and 200 foot on center.
Unplanted median areas proposed for
future traffic or turn lanes shall be
grassed.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing mountable and vertical curb
around medians and vertical along
outside lanes.
This segment of roadway is totally zoned and 90% developed with
roadside commercial facilities. Attention must be given in the
landscape design to address visibility for the high amount of
automobile traffic entering and exiting this roadway.
5 -6
Packet Page -1417-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Coronado Parkway
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Type "F" vertical face 6 inch ht. curb.
Hunter Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Type "F" vertical face 6 inch ht. curb.
Sunshine Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T3, medians with plant
beds and turf.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing vertical face 6 inch ht. curb
around median noses and turn lanes.
Tropicana Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Existing Type T3, medians with plant
beds and turf.
Irrigation: Existing well & pump with conventional
pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing vertical face 6 inch ht. curb
around median noses and turn lanes.
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
(Coronado Pkwy. to Green Blvd., Phase II)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plants and no
turf.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Vertical face curb around entire
medians.
Decorative paving: Within turn lane stack areas and /or
separators.
5 -7
Packet Page =1418-
03/1997
03/2011
n
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Santa Barbara Boulevard, North
(G.G. Canal to end of existing 6 -lane Roadway Improvements,
Phase I )
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plants and no
turf.
Irrigation: Conventional pop -up system. Irrigation
sleeves are existing.
Curbing: Existing.
Decorative paving: Existing.
Golden Gate Parkway East
This segment of roadway has been irrigated and landscaped. The
landscape design used was a modified Type T3 as listed above.
Continued maintenance and renovation of plant beds will be
needed.
Existing Uncurbed Roadways
Green Boulevard
Typical landscape plan: Type T5, medians with plant beds.
Irrigation:
Conventional pop -up system.
Curbing: Existing 6" ht. curb around median noses
and Type "F" vertical face 6 inch ht.
curb.
IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
The following information evaluates the potential use and cost
effectiveness of water resources and irrigation systems that
would be available for use within the Beautification M.S.T.U.
area.
Reclaimed water transmission line systems
Two reclaimed water transmission line systems were analyzed. The
systems would provide reclaimed water for all roadways within the
M.S.T.U. boundary. One system utilized the Florida Cities
Utilities Company's existing wastewater treatment plant as the
source. The high estimated costs to install this system made the
implementation unfeasible. The other alternate system was a
Packet Page -1419-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
reclaimed water transmission line system connected and supplied
from the proposed Collier County reclaimed water pipe line that
crosses at the intersection of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951) and
Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. The high estimated costs for
installing this system made the implementation unfeasible. The
costs of both systems are unrealistic based upon present and
projected M.S.T.U. revenues.
Reclaimed water tanker applied
This method of watering would not require in place irrigation
system equipment or components. The water would be applied with a
special equipped tanker truck on medians with a width of 20 feet
or less. This type of watering method is a very successful and
cost effective system for watering landscape areas where the
potable or treated water cost is high or where a well and pump
system is not feasible such as in coastal areas. This type method
of irrigating is presently being utilized within the City of
Marco Island on its un- irrigated roadway medians. This method of
water because of its high annual operational costs would use to
much of the M.S.T.U. operational revenues at build out.
Well and pump transmission line system
This study was based on installing an inter connecting well and
pump system to all roadway areas. The system would utilize the
existing wells, pumps and transmission lines located along Golden n.
Gate Parkway East. The estimated high cost to implement this
system with the present M.S.T.U. revenues makes it unrealistic.
Potable / Treated water
The internal roadways of Coronado, Sunshine, and Tropicana could
be connected to the existing potable water system. The initial
connection costs would be very low, but the long term use cost
per gallon would be very high.
Conventional pop -up spray systems
The conventional irrigation system remains the most cost
effective system to install and maintain. The system shall be
designed so as not to permit or reduce to the greatest extent
possible, overspray and seeping onto the paved areas. The pop -up
systems must utilize low volume, low angle spray nozzles and
pressure reducing devices. Systems designed for medians using
pop -up mist type spray sprinklers should have the sprinklers
spaced on a triangular layout verses a square layout whenever
possible. This will reduce the total number of sprinklers
required in the medians. Systems designed for medians with turf
using pop -up rotor sprinklers should be designed so the n
5 -9
Packet Page -1420-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
sprinklers are spaced on a square head to head layout and
installed 18 inches off back of curbing. In medians wider than 20
feet with a generally centerline planting of drought tolerant
plants should have head to head coverage along the sides of the
medians and not necessarily across the median width. The
centerline median planting of drought tolerant plants naturally
requires less water. Medians 20 feet or wider with just turf
should have an additional center row of sprinklers in order to
reduce the sprinkler radius requirements. The above pop -up
sprinkler layouts combined with utilizing drought tolerant plants
provides for water coverage while minimizing the chance of
overspray and seeping. All sprinklers within the roadways should
be installed on flexible plastic pipe off the lateral piping.
Irrigation zoning should occur based upon plant type water
requirements whenever possible. Canopy trees and palms should be
on a separate low volume drip /bubbler zone.
IRRIGATION, PLANT MATERIAL AND MAINTENANCE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Refer to the Collier County Right -of -way Ordinance "Construction
Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Rights -of -Way" most
current edition for irrigation, plant materials and maintenance
standards and guidelines.
5 -10 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1421-
5 -11
Packet Page -1422-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011
Item 16.A.17.
Figure 15
Z' -emu
.
61
Iy LOGO nA1E oe VZ~
I -�
WfA a< ttaXf OE M"-pf vu t S.
54Q iuAriE AiZM
L=P 9f C-T
'�
NAME 5163N W119 We-F -A -
• (
n«,►�f M MX**E7 rl�UL
4Te�tuAn�s�u b��
lM�t4p.�wv
s�r;t
'
PAIRISf METAL T' AIS
2r iu i-
A� 1
I
W11w 6.ALV.
LAIq W17,toOia rwNf
}
OC4JaGt�t,ts�>rEN C.c�1.a�
:�,
�Q� i'h.'xti' woov
U)
t11r GotatL to
p
�
5
�
zli
P. 3 9W i'LUeltl6
-a
ft.`I4eOD 51&.K
� �,
t�tx.luy,cocoe.
foaB
3
lNFOEMA41ON o¢.
G0lt'(i�L
Z
�NJ►tl�L
q p
`t
BAUD 'fo L¢b�AfG q`k4"
to
3�
N
BE- Gsr 11
t
S
_j
8
O
.6
Z
2
:z
7
O
Z
-ATL- WVI SlML SS
za"
d
2
FA N%P NI'RR ZOIA D
Q
-f
o
ALI• Qof %i ALL 5* IeT
1411 M- 3W' 1 ufb Of-
Street
Name
&
Traffic
control
Signage
5 -11
Packet Page -1422-
03/1997
03/2011
n
'53Nb"l 3NV'l
�t
d�z a�,y
5 -12
Q, �.
QT
Z
z
i 117
{., z
r-
a �
z
z
0
Q
Packet Page -1423-
n
O
U
i
.r
r
•
•
t
•
12/13/2011 item 16.A.17.
Figure 16
03/1997
03/2011
o
..
w
Z
is> N
SNVI
Na
d�
5 -12
Q, �.
QT
Z
z
i 117
{., z
r-
a �
z
z
0
Q
Packet Page -1423-
n
O
U
i
.r
r
•
•
t
•
12/13/2011 item 16.A.17.
Figure 16
03/1997
03/2011
eee
..
eeee�e
5 -12
Q, �.
QT
Z
z
i 117
{., z
r-
a �
z
z
0
Q
Packet Page -1423-
n
O
U
i
.r
r
•
•
t
•
12/13/2011 item 16.A.17.
Figure 16
03/1997
03/2011
iL
Q
• o Lp
`a
Packet Page -1424-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 17
0
E
L
M�
W
T�
NO
CfS
� Z
L
03/1997
03/2011
n
O
LU
�I
�-
J
E61
Packet Page -1424-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 17
0
E
L
M�
W
T�
NO
CfS
� Z
L
03/1997
03/2011
n
O
LU
�I
�-
J
r
p U
U
�
rb't$
5 -13
Packet Page -1424-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 17
0
E
L
M�
W
T�
NO
CfS
� Z
L
03/1997
03/2011
n
10-*N
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 18
�INCWE LOMINAIM PCL%LS WMIMAIZe
'NACAL
C',
va
i00000 AVI f tCVzMl4
---pomho M W
4kwc8m II
-01—
hOU"
Street/Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures
5-14 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1425-
j
N
SKFOfPW
-6:-� WOK9 MCAAf FOLEA•
14rF, Fav+ C&N Is vpw WjrH
Q WAM Or- VoLyas Lutli NAJMS,..
1A
ClWOMV LADS
I
---pomho M W
4kwc8m II
-01—
hOU"
Street/Roadway Decorative Light Fixtures
5-14 03/1997
03/2011
Packet Page -1425-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
I Figure 18A
`_tea WR •.r..J"�'�;�V
V�Q
� I
C Ut11i Of- CLU °L S1&R'f ZONE
--
"� q �Tts+�c,t. Faay t%D4.6 0�
4iOP6AQ, �t1�pFiC�U►1�ti.
a.e- ttnffic. WOWS
AYbAS WNf S i1414ficaaoaa
V- 1 ve04LtVM4tMUtt{fafa*AZ
�t�attzr�.{E ,�PUes.
t cu�*rvw
oetAit,. *y
r^ Unc-f ar u.sA?- �,%,Rf ZONM
FDS�EA St'�G ttPN
35
5
S
5i4�Fi -( DNrt4N P 1�i.
i?
1�
y
►N►riv
250
pGy {RASLG
I1
q0O
�O
5 -15
Packet Page -1426-
03/1997
03/2011
n
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Figure 18B
. R.I.5.
30` - qr5 r"i P.K. or- omA-f m
� 4Ei �u • osz
�' 5oTlott UMI-f
3•rs�x,'
4'- aOtS.P.?4o�
Y
OF CANOM Eh
wruu. wt-m No wes
G' MIN. _
`-OF UMI-f O� F YLANf,577�_�
-..�-.
4faAf4iLN -nowl
M
x
3
3V,N1 W W, 17MU M
ox LA�
r
utul
_�-
or- rLAw d?
N
CUV
PAVEt1EN'( FtNttiFtED C�YJq�
FA.VEttKf-
Sight
Window Detail
within Clear Sight
Zone
. R.I.5.
Gt�RB
Typical Sight Window Detail
5 -16
Packet Page -1427-
I
MR
03/1997
03/2011
30` - qr5 r"i P.K. or- omA-f m
� 4Ei �u • osz
3•rs�x,'
4'- aOtS.P.?4o�
Y
`-OF UMI-f O� F YLANf,577�_�
-..�-.
Gt�RB
Typical Sight Window Detail
5 -16
Packet Page -1427-
I
MR
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
RAntion 6
BEAUTIFICATION IMPROVEMENT COSTS AND CONSIDERATIONS
The cost information utilized in these estimates are based upon
Collier County Government and F.D.O.T. statewide average bids
and existing contract pricing related to roadway landscape,
curbing, irrigation and lighting improvements.
Planting cost
The plant material
Canopy trees:
Accent trees:
Cabbage palms:
Large shrubs:
Small shrubs:
Ground covers:
costs were based upon the
101- 12' ht., 2.5"
8' -10' ht., 30 gal.
101- 15' ht. clear
10 gal. 4' -5' ht.
3 gal. 18 " -24" ht.
1 gal. 6 " -12" ht.
following sizes:
cal., 501o.c.
or B & B
or booted trunks
Irrigation System
The irrigation costs include an installed 100 percent coverage,
conventional pop -up system. The cost covers casing /sleeves, main
lines, wiring, valves, sprinkler heads and pump & well systems.
Design and Contract Administration Fees
These fees are for professional design services and /or
consultation from a registered landscape architect and
registered engineer for lighting projects.
Site Preparation
Covers the costs for vegetation removal, grading, soil removal
and /or replacement.
Concrete Curbing
Cost to install concrete curbing around entire median. Curbing
cost include minor modifications to the turn lane tapers and
median opening closures.
Decorative Paving
Covers cost to install sand set concrete interlocking pavers.
Two lane Road In -Road Pathway Facility
The cost shown under this item applies to implementing the bike
facilities concept based on the "Uncurbed Collector Roadways
Development Concept" section /elevations. In -road facility cost
only includes cost of re- striping roadway.
6 -1
Packet Page -1428-
03/1997
03/2011
1/�
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Pedestrian Decorative Lights
Cost to install decorative pedestrian scale lighting at median
n ends and at major pedestrian oriented intersections or
crossings.
Annual Landscape Maintenance
These costs are based upon current contract pricing and cover
services as specified under the technical maintenance
specifications being presently implemented by Collier County
Transportation Services.
Asphalt Paving
Cost to install asphalt paving for drainage improvement, turn
lane extensions and patching purposes.
Pedestrian Crosswalk Markings
Cost to install surface applied high visibility pedestrian
crosswalk markings.
6 -2
Packet Page -1429-
03/1997
03/2011
rn
i
w
w
N
O
F-'
F-'
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
z
D
TOWS gLnwM DM�pC�v_»��
-i0 60
00
w
o
o
o o
'=
c =.v m m m m g m o g�CD 2
s 2.
M Q
o 0
�
O
•
(<• i ni ar CA
? i �
00
-�
v
? W N -�
.� cfl
_ _ _
7 0 � . « = rt = fgD (D
(D Z
as
� m m a< a m n� n>
G p
5'
o`er
°-a
a �O
CO)
CD
:°�
my ��ccOOw< T3
a °
ocErr
�-fl>
a
-�o
3 ao w a) a'a o
CL
CD
v
C)U0,,Tm
M
v�
cQ m� Ca -0 CL ��
t � �
t (n
m
m
rCa, 'r� a o W
w 30
a 00-
.Z
D-
oo��
�cno
a �
' �
�- -<
m
CO
0
C
n o
; n n
cQ : =3
N N 0
QQ.o
N w �
�•fl.�0
:3�CL
n * C• N
= fD
CL
=r _
o 0-0
.69
-109 69
-69 b9 -69tfl�-69-9%totflt9 tfl-69 -69M
°,m c
3 C
N
N
-A6 -Di.
5" — n n
W
�
v vC
n
U
O
OD
O C C C C C C� p`
OD ZZCLCL
W
�
p
O
W
Q.00p- C a aN3O�
CO (D CO (D Ci Ci (D CD (7 (D (D cD A cD
=r <
Q-
—10
o
o
o
00o
oQrnQ n.a as - b- W.
a 5
ao -n
o
oil
O bon
o o 000
m d4,Z
o
m
o
G) 11 ��2 r�
o
0 =3 0
_
a)
(D �.o �m c m w pm a
(°
m M�
o .c
v, m'
3
v
m
— R n -=
N°
�. �
a o o ai <m -a•Ch CD v�
W
(p N
3
2-.-
a
c
c G)- amo�/r 3 a
oCO
/aye
_= m o
O =
CD
-a m m a < �_ CD 0 _- a) '
m
(D x• n
CO aD
(n C ' 1- :3
1
N (D
CD ' b
O n ( Q- O '(D (D , Q (D
0
,-r
a- O
O
:3 Q' U a) -o Cr S• CD
(n (0
N
-M
Q
-09
(n V 1•
CD -0 < :3 1
(D (D m 3 CD S?� cc W
'
co Q
0
a o m C
`�
a
m ca
:3
v U) ca a
C.
_0
r
�- OD
°
0'
cQ
as
co n
po
CDa
CO) 1
1
n
Packet Page -1430-
pH►
C!'
N
N
rn
I
.A
0
w
O
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Z
D
-I
oo50 M
M o 0 0
CL am r
Q-
�-
°? ni ° - -� D
D.
c
°- n. CD
.<
N
0
w
3 '
7 CC
(D G
W
:3 CL j
a D
��0 �
go
go
CL
°��°� to
m
o v ?p
_
M.
_
f!1
(D (D
X00
Co Cn (n x•
v .« ° <
(D'
m
(D'
v ty
C
cc
< o (D
v
7
Q.'
CD
, 7
I
(a
3
m o CD
(D
,� co
N Cn
a- N
(D 7
=r CD t%
p)
N O .�
:3
N
rt
O N O
0CD 0
Q (D tD N
(�D a O
_
(D
(D
O
<
CO) 01
=
CD
fD CL
cD O .D
3-ma�
N
(D
3
_ O
N _
o(o D
O° 3
0
v m °r
(D < a-v
CL en
tfl��3
'
c ,
Cn
°
�� �
Oa-
0
°
� D
=a o
-1 -I :
�
'' O
3 =a°
wWWC
.�
ou)
C000
o
w t
oCo CL
0
Co
3 y N
o 0
(D -a fn 1•I
O
(D N N
Q a (D n.
3
vD. D O
Cn (D (D
_
(D -
Q.M-4
c�(atn
n
� Q a-
a. :3
CD
.N. C n 7
Co to C
'"
O O
B1 D_
n ° O
D N Q
3
(D
N
Cn
N
O N (D
C
�
��
•
D.
< O
_
=r
CJ1
(D 3 _0
� C N
O
(D
O
D D'
3
O
'�. C
(D cr 0 C
v
5' N
�G D.
O (D
n 5..0 (D
(D
o
`Z
N D_
N
w
a D_
" � O
CD
K
..
to
= 0
.+ +7
O D_
0
CD
a� (D
c•<
CD (°
m
° -°
o
(D to (D
(D
-a O
D.
�.0.
CD
(D
°
N
-0.
v
0
m
m
c
D.
CD
Packet Page -1431-
M
0
M
E
pH�
CT'
r
m
N
rn
I
U
O
w
N
O
N
N
pWN—�
—iKKM
CO
CC=
i
� �. 3
�l<
CY CD
C2 N O M
CD a O
N O M -p CL
M O< 0--o
aQ. — CA
01 M
O
O
3 6L
05'v�
O co C2 =
CL
CL O =
N
CD % O CD
CC] CAD N C2
O a O
C
QNCC CCDD
CCn O Cap N
.. a O
2L M
CL
O
n
,�. O N
CL
O
m 3 -0
(a •n0
O O
=' C 0
Cv
C2
,Nr
CL
=�
w
.1 C L
m CL m
a N O
CD cQ
CD -0
tQ C.
X.+
C
CD
O
CD
CL
CD
0
0
Cv
CD
-0 X -0 M
M O m o
mam°'
CL
CD ° v 3
0 ? 0
°� < 0 M
m' CD j 3
CD .N+ o CD
� COD CD C%
N —
Co
O•
N
ffl Efl 4fl 3
Co Co Co
000.
-0 Co -n y
.'
CL CD 0.
Q. N CCD
N v (Q N
. O � N
O � O O
CO O = N C
Q
S
t_NnNCCD
Cn Q
O C N 0
0 Q
0 (�D 0 N
0 O Q
-0 CD
O O
Q. O 0.
O CL
CL N
CD CC]
CD CD
7 -0 0
(0-0.
v
-0 C•i
CD N
`i
0
0
0
CD
CL
v
O
CD
O
r
sv
0
a
N
0
N
N
90
cQ'
0
O
tv
O
N
O
>v
O
0
CD
c
7
C1
CD
C2
0
C
(O
0
O
CD
0
O
C
7
O
N
fl.
N
7
CD
O
iv
7
0
CD
0
C
C1
CA
Packet Page -1432-
a1
CD
A
CD
r
v
0
CL
N
0
>v
CD
90
co'
v
0
3
O
CD
N
N
0
O
CD
m
a�
7
CL
N
n
as
M
p1
7
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
0
0
— a Q
3 m
CD
C2
v CD y
C3 M
CD
SD fU
CO '<
Cn K-
O CD M
O C2 N
CA N rr
Cn O
-0 CQ 6i
CD
C~D
CD
O O O
Co
CD Q
M CD
cQ
CND
O to
0 3
cn CD
O �
0--'4
=.. O
O
N
!v
CD
O
v
7
0
CD
N
CD
Cv
N
OD
Cn
O
Ul
X
D
Co
H
N
m
w
�
1001%\
B
CD
�
\
�
CD
� Rm�
ee-:,- KKM
g7MgqU
.Cl) C:C2.
ocn 2 %2
(D :E(D
(D
go
Ek,&
, o ■ o 2 §
§ -0 CL
� 0 CD Cn
0 CCD0-a
�Cn —�
3 CL 0 § :
M,0 . -wd
o $ (M CL -•
�
0 2
7 -0 :3g
»CL -§
§ § g -0 U)
CL g R�
k Egg§ CL
Eoo
�0E�
2 k R�
0Bja
ICc
0
§� \K
UC ®m
�gO
�2CL C)
�E ■/
4 ate
C 3
Cn
_ ]
g k%
� � ■
Cn
� 7
A
q o
C
CD
a
M
Cn
■ !D
_0 ;o _0 X
M o 0 o
CL a) CL ■
2fg�
JJ=2.■
:30-
CL m -]
00 -�
�
% k
@ C n 2
U2 CD CD
@
2m■
J � .
c
/
69,69 -693
�
¥w--i :_,
03 w w •
000.
0
0
0(D
k CL m
m m
00-
�,.m
2 �
�E■
� _ (n
2 0
a Cn
d�7
:E�
0E§
CL —a
U 0 a)
�2E
n o CL
o � §•
2CL0
■
k0B
Cl
0��
\f 0
B&
CD CD $
L:•]
CD
CD ° o
CL 0 CD
C
�■-
k
0
k'
c
Packet Page -133
�
�
c
�
§
■
E
�
�
■
�
§
§
CL
§
2
90
k'
0
\
0
$
]
■
C
0
]
�
/
n
@
9
2
w
2
m
C
Co
Co
CA
12/13/2011 I m 16.A.17.
ff
Q
E
�
�
■
n
■
■
�
�
0
0
�CL2 =
2 §
CL
§ CL
m
w¥o
6.
N D
�C�
d
K■
�%t
o_ § CA
V C
(M a)
co C g
�
a)Up
kCD-1
■ Cr
2 a;
£ m-
0) \/
CD
m �
�o
�q
k�
�
qi
D�
<
CO)
�
�
R
■
a
rn
i
O
w
N
O
N
F-`
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
zrD :? 0 0 =7 cv Q= rnm v
O= vm v o � � v omv r ° = .• � a� o o o —? � I -o � o � ^n
m 0 � D 3. .Q< CL CL m
m =�= o m m m o° -0 C M ° m m ° N 08 Q� — Q o O � C
W N-�N N�OD O� ° v Q
Cr .,( a) o O W N N" Z
W�v MM' mm m -a Q° n n
" _0 a) v a`< W W m QO l<m ° nyo m a-= w,m <0 G D
WfnCl1� o 3 ° ? �.<(a�° 0) m m �. Q�CO o CL NOD
CCO 0 d) `< r.� Q� 'Or 0) j Q03 O
O m to N = O (D t0
Cr ° '< a) �p _ O a_ o m o Z° M �-
CL CD CD — CD a- m O a- � CL > co rt D — C (a ° > > o
CC
�•0 -0 o — a) _0 o N 6O < o N =G
a��CD 3� M0wC° —Cc -0
a< CL (n 3- m� 3 �m CD
CD ° °c 7 � a
CL o
..o -° CD m v W
3a
cf C< m . . �flflt tfl���tfl� CD Q a -0 C ami o
_
-* co Q C 3 ° � �G Ot
m 0- a- i i i i i i i i 0 m 0 CD (D ='• O 3� o
d1 O O m O O O O O O W M 6 6 6 6 6 6 "•O O O j 0 0)
O m M .. O• O 0 i 70 o :3 O
CL C n Q 7 •► 0) — m -
7 N 'a — _.-.. - - -- -- O N� m ai � n O 3 Qt
0. S• 0) O a' m O. O X C (D W M W 0 � O�� ° 0 0�
N ° Q. — v CLc O Q 3 mcc
CD CD O 90 o 5 m 0 N '� fD n ° 3 v co Cn <
no ° v�m-,m� 0) o° m�m� moo•
' m o ° o v 3 a0 cn~0 Co o 3 —n
< .N« m � m ° 0 .Ot m C fA .Ot m Cr
V.�'"
CD N m Q= CD 0 fl1 CC a O a- Q CD M Q 00 v
to ' m m C � C O ,. m
_ � C O CD
cc Z CL (n ID K < O `G m O N. "°_ 0 M N
Ul O N In v3`< 00fo O N .•r 0 ��
Q O O— O
CD a- - C W
Q l< m 0 Q-
m
►m a * 0
CD
Cv
cD
o
�°
=r CL
M 0
Q v
CD 0
0 M
0 0
M �.
v
a o
mv
Q
N
l<
Packet Page -1434-
H
r
m
L"
..
0
w
N
0
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Z D �p•� �p� o o 0 m � ^O nc 2
p
'* o (D a) U) 0 O p CL P W N- (COD j v cc a: --", rt = fl: �: (D O SU 7 M
W �? �� m'� v m < CD (n go CL Q.� D
O.O : n�CD o ��opo
_
(COD ��� �O N fu C
D a) Z C7 K 3 O1 O \ 7 Uf O. � (Q lu ,N. W O Cp M
C7 N N (D 0 N `� (O O r O D1
3F M CL
0 (D 0 < .3► O D) - — Cl)
CD CO)
v
7 O 0 7 W 2
0cM (� 0 �� 0 (n0 0
QQN 01 n. O 0 W C
Qm D
0 M. paj O, N
O p� < :3 qt
.O. Q. Q Q = r
a1 -* O (D <
' o 0 -0 ffl {fl i!9 ffl ,69 ifl 69 69 69 69 fA -.9 ffl ffl 4fl M � + p� =-
� N N N M n n n n cam n n n v Z
CO C)OMmmmmmtj
Cr O O� O O 0 0= ��
Q p O O O O 0 0 C 7 3
O Z O 3 � Q° (D 0 n CL O N W � (O
U) 3 (D g (D O U) < (D "a. (D "� O . (D O
N Q C C O G) v O v '� p Qp O O
c 90 a) n-0 m —
m CL
j-I .< E N (p .= N 01(Q l� O 0
N N p =C
0 Ci O 0 CD 0- .(O D Q N O
o - OO (�D p) "O Cr (D O
o U)
a1 (D v (O
CD 7 .n_+7'< SN 90
O O O Ul '7l � (D 3 .. W O
(O Q O � 0
O v N (0 v 7
O " v Co Cr
90 0 (D
.. r a
0' = -•
0a
(Q (Do
po
(D =
w
c0 �
Packet Page -1435-
A
ii
u
i
u
H
r
01
I
O
w
N
O
N
Iz
0
CD
ri
C'
W
p
0
Cr
CD
a
m
CD
:'
CD
v
CD
0
C2
CD
N
cQ'
0
v
°
sz
5'
0
v
O
O
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
o.� ° aCLCL0 M m con o oCa °? o o m w o
o t?. r CD v a o m m cD o 0 -0 cQ• cD co v v v n.
< 0 - CG o O n 0 v °: (°. CD 0 ID 0 0 CQ' � 0 :E M
Q� 3 W° ° atQ <a�'n� v' <oa Q* n �.a �fDCQ�<
Cn (D L Q.� Cn CD CD 0° 0 CD n� D o ° �'
x'90 Co �-u �Dn- - c viz � �QC°.< o ° � ° C
r-p m as o o 0 CO 9° =r `< v CD _ m
= � v" cQ 0 r W av m° cn a 3 1 M w � w
o° gv 0o3mG)
CD cQ cQ ; °�v,�. 0CL3x�
° °a
v = � v x o
CD �oc M CDCAFL
Cn CL
C.4 C0 `� 0 c �0 X .0
0 a O O.
CO Q aa�w W =v°
CD 0 p 0 0
°oo Cr �t�t���r���a�r��in tfl- ?. CD m w w CD CO
�. N N O 0 CL '^ V 0n
oc w ° CD mmmm c° o 0 CD "c,CD 3
O O N w X X X X X C� CD o p -0 o 0 =• n
_ � W 0 Cn
CD
CO Cn CL 0) C) 7 M' D' =' 7 CD O 02 CD 7 CD O tD 7 -
.. Q- m owmac° 0�c
v =,r °o °o °o °oX °"na��i -4 3•
mcQ r3 30� _ °a
a0 —0 Cr C,<
a cQ m 0• � o
0 O�Ng a
0 ( 0 y v M 0 0
3 n -I ��� - - -�-� -� �3 to Q.naG m 3
C CO i WWW Wa) wWWW Q.a 0
0:3 poopppooppppppp M o c v O 60 CD
CD CD CO
CL CL 03 w CD
-n a°, �C =°�Q moo 0 ;0 °c g o b�Cn U(n�Gr° CD o ._. °
�� 00 mvp °°��� La) 0) my
r 0 cnaca,0CL CL r_ °' a 00w
�3 90 =CD�OCN��On00 ��.« r.°
°� CD p0cn°gm� °0 =� •<o� 0N3
G) a O CD —< 3 a 0D O W 0 CD CD
0m 3 90Wc- <rn 0 CD9G) � w CD 7 CD -03 jTj CD 0� O N go a1 O O O v 0
0 3 CD °� �r ° 0aia—, z(o U) 0)
Q v
' U °: K o a m a0 o
4&9 n ) 11 : CD
P
CD Q) R* C CD 90 0 90 K �
�v a < ° =°
o m T�3 v� O N c0 0
p� v `mac o a M x -I
CL n =r v Cn to o m m
cn
rt C a
a1
M
Q � Q CL
CD 3
O
w w
CL O
v
Packet Page -1436-
X
D
Cn
H
N
N
J
0
0
w
N
O
N
Iz
0
—I Z
D �
I C
--13
o
fD �
>s
Q (D
CD
fD CD
CD Q-
0- o
M �
CL
CD
Q
o -
-^ a
C
( o
co' u0i
v 0
7 Co
Q co
5' a
N
CD
0
O
0
O
3
0
O
C
O
`G
N
N
7
Q
w
Q.
O
(D
(D
cs�
c
m
0
0-
cD
CL
0
0
O
'•h
G'
CD
4-
c
lD
X m o
C M
C�
`G Gl
CL O
CD
0 N
.�
N — O
O O
fD 7
(OD M CO
co'
N
�°�
C
- n
O
u)-
CDCT
�.
C
co' CD
o
c
3
Q
C Cr
Q 0.
Cr O
7 "a
0 O
O
O Q
.Or 0'
(D
Q O
r_ -a
N
. 3
co
3 c'
D) N
3•
m�
o
m
aCD
o Z
CD M.
o
c
1
Packet Page -1437-
O
Ln
O
O
O
0
0
a�
7
O
d
7
n
lD
r
v
CL
En
0
v
CD
90
0,
sv
0
3
O
G
fD
(D
N
0
0
CD
O
rn
O
V
rn
O
N
O
O
O
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
ff
IZ
0
0
w
CD
ooc�
CL o
a
(D
Q.
�
7
!v (Q fD
fD 3
rn
co =%<
A, (D
w U)
cn - M
fA y
-+. CD .*
O_ rt
O O
.+ N
cc (D
c8 CD M
0
o v
CD
a
�G m
a3i c°
5' 0-
m -4
0 w
3
3_
0
m
(D �
OD
N —
O L-.
Ln : -
O
O
O
O
O
v
D
Cl)
H
N
N
OD
ON
I
F-�
F✓
O
w
N
O
N
N
Iz
O
N -'
--j K
Co Cn
0-1
I C
--13
0
Cr `C
(D aS
a (D
(CD "
(D
-n _a CD
O
3 E•
(D 0-
CL
v 0 o
.. 0
3 Q-
o
CD a
W E
N O
(Q D)
O
v O
O �
CL (°
7 a
C (D
D) 0
O
O �+
�O
3
n
.0
O
'•G
;n
N
O
a
!v
CL
m
(D
(Q
C
CD
0
.-r
CD
a
IV
0
O
C•
CD
c
(D
X m o
MIL CL
C
1
CL
0�3
N O
D
Co 0
(CD 7
N O 0
(O
CO)
O ' -I
C
- n
0
��u
(D n
CD
Cc N
N
5. =
O O
G
N Q
3
C (D
a 5.
(D 0
5-0
0 O
O
O Q
N �.
(D
a O
C �
C"
(a �
3�
!v CO
6
N 3.
�
� O
O (D
a3
cD CD
0
D .O.
(SOD
(7
u
C
7
CL
N
TI
O_
{79
O
U1
O
O
O
Packet Page -1438-
0
c
(D
sv
0
(D
r
0
a
0
N
N
IO
(Q'
v
O
3
O
(D
N
7
N
O
a
M
(D
T
O
O
N
4fl
�A
O
O
O
O
M
>y
a
W
Cl
sv
(D
ni
O
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
X
0
Iv
CL
Iv
C
(D
CL
w
Cn
0
O
�l
O
(D
O
v
Cl.
Cr
0
m
(D
CL
(D
N
N
0
`G
00G)
v v O
CL
3 v M
(D
a a 3
ID (D Iv
(a M
cD O '0
O
� O
cn
cn 3, w
0M
Ul -
m
Co fu
N 0
CL r*
rt
=� O
O N W
E N
N CD C.
�a) <
0 " M
CD CO)
3 t3
N S
5C-
C y
C D O
v 3
O
0
CD
�
� W
(D O
Iv CO
O
U1 v
N
O
O
O
X
D
v
D
:.
H
N
tG
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 7
PHASING AND FUNDING SCHEDULES
Golden Gate Beautification Master Plan
Multiple Year Roadway Phasing & Funding Schedule
The phasing and funding schedule was developed to address the Collier County
major arterial roadways within the M.S.T.U. first and then improve the
collector roadways within the M.S.T.U. district. It is apparent these
roadways are the Gateway roads within the Golden Gate Community, as well as
for southeast Collier County and the Naples Urban Area. This phasing schedule
is in keeping with the Master plan goals and original philosophy behind the
original Golden Gate Parkway East roadway beautification project.
The phasing and funding schedule is based upon the concept to continue the
public /private partnership with the Collier County Board of County
Commissioners. This schedule is also consistent with the Collier County's
past actions to assist in funding and implementation of roadway
beautification within the Naples Urban Area on a case by case basis. The
schedule is also consistent with the previously adopted "Collier County
Streetscape Master Plan" and the recently adopted "Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan ". The schedule is in keeping with the methodology,
intent, and streetscape network of roadways to be improved by the above
mentioned Master Plans. The methodology of the multiple year schedule is to
assist the County in reducing the time frame and funding costs of the roadway
landscape improvements by utilizing local residents tax dollars and volunteer
services for administration of the projects. The multiple year schedule
benefits the County and local residents by saving money and beautifying
Collier County roadways.
The schedule costs do not take into account potential outside funding from
grants or private local organizations.
M.S.T.U. Major Arterial Roadways
#1: Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Part "A"
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
FY 1997 -1998 (Completed)
Type T5
Funded under the Collier County
M.S.T.D.
Existing curbed roadway.
#2: Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), Part "B"
(Golden Gate Parkway to Green Blvd.)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
FY 1998 -1999 (Completed)
Type T3 curbed
Funded under the Collier County
M.S.T.D.
7 -1
Packet Page -1439-
03/1997
03/2011
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Curbing: Existing curbed roadway.
#3: Santa Barbara Blvd., North
(Golden Gate Canal to end of Six Lane Improvements, Phase I)
Implementation date:
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
Undetermined, (To be implemented
under Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan)
Type T5
To be funded under the Collier
County (M.S.T.D.) Transportation
Services landscape maintenance
budgets.
Curbing: Existing
#4: Santa Barbara Blvd., North, Unimproved Four Lane Section
(End of Six Lane Improvements to Green Blvd., Phase II)
Implementation date: Undetermined (To be Implemented
under Collier County Landscape
Beautification Master Plan)
Typical landscape plan:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
Type T5
To be funded under the Collier
County (M.S.T.D.) Transportation
Services landscape maintenance
budgets.
Installed with roadway improvement
project.
M.S.T.U. Interior Collector Roadways
#1: Tropicana Blvd.
(Golden Gate Canal to Golden Gate Parkway, East)
Implementation date: FY 2002 -2003 (Completed)
Typical landscape plan:
Lighting:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
Pathwav Facilities:
Type T3 curbed
Pedestrian accent fixture at median
ends.
M.S.T.U. funded
FDOT Type "D" medians only
Existing Two Lane Road in -road
pathway and 5' asphalt sidewalk
along both rights -of -way.
#2: Sunshine Blvd.
(Golden Gate Parkway to Green Canal)
Implementation date:
FY 2006 -2007 (Completed)
7 -2
Packet Page -1440-
03/1997
03/2011
1111\
i1*11
r�
Typical landscape plan:
Lighting:
Annual maintenance:
Curbing:
Pathway Facilities:
#3: Hunter Blvd.
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Type T3 curbed
Pedestrian accent fixture at median
ends.
M.S.T.U. funded
FDOT Type "D" medians only
Existing 5' asphalt & concrete
sidewalk along both rights -of -way.
(Coronado Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd. North)
Implementation date: FY: 2010 -2011 (Under Construction)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5
Annual maintenance: M.S.T.U. funded
Curbing: FDOT Type "F" medians only
Pathway Facilities: Existing Two Lane Road In -Road
Pathway. Recommended 51concrete
sidewalk along south & west rights -
of -way.
#4: Coronado Parkwa
(Golden Gate Parkway to Santa Barbara Blvd. North)
Implementation date: FY: 2010 -2011 (Under Construction)
Typical landscape plan: Type T5
Annual maintenance: M.S.T.U. funded
Curbing: FDOT Type "F" medians only
Pathway Facilities: Existing 5' asphalt & concrete
sidewalks along both rights -of -way.
7 -3
Packet Page -1441-
03/1997
03/2011
to A w N i
9000 nv3
>'oz OCR
°mm Mz�
3 � x O z 0^
3=> zo <—
r- v -n3z
16)D O.,mv
MOM T -I Z n
<N0vcm
o — z 9000
Oczi -xm�m
C) m � m D
m�mZZ-
cnmx�r<
S C z Z
mZoon3
Co r
z 0 - c m
Cm 0>M (a
3 b. n m
6n
--yi °v n m m
c m O o <
z0 CO) in
c°n3 X>O
D � M Z 0
m <Cn0z
3m MD
>3 v <z
Z -u m m
Z T z C n
�l Zz TW
i 0v m
M Cn
O D W x
mrc�
M
tnm0<
X Nm
Z
D m �' m
r� N
Cn m
X C
n
w c
c °
m
r —1
m
v
x
z m
CO) m
C Z
v
n
m m
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m --13 O
p < -G G -< -< -G < [ t ?� D C
N N N N N N N N i i i i i i i i i i X �"' O
N4 Of (A A W N i O tO o -4 W to A W N i O n;a r-
>
— < M
< m m Z
Z
ncmG)
MNnD
v+ v+ v 414 v 414 v► v► v+ v+ vi v► v+ V9. v+ v+ v j D C
o"m mZ 3
Ca W N N .Wa U) Ca w w w W N N N N N N N N A m `G m D C Z N
O O O to t0 to Co Co Co Co V i CD Z x
Of N 10 01 W O V A i W 6n N 10 O W O Co 611 > �l C O D C
O 00 Ol ? W N O O -+ i
w o A i i w W ao o cn w w V w CO N � o m � Z Z
A Of O to N O W Co -1 to A N Co A OD tO tD O O v o
�O
v+ v+ vt vw v, di tw vi +w v+ dt v+ v+ d, 40 vt vt vt + O = x
N
M OM'n0 C
N O w cc V v W M A A W N N s O tiff m CO) D CO) Z
A A �71 W V tO i W VI OD i A V O A W i V D Sl -i CO) i N W 01 W W A to W A -+ i W -4 N O tli O M' z r=
A O W w tO -+ Of W W W w V A N t0 to i t0 m y ci r
CA A W t0 to i V O W O N O 0 V W -4 i W ° O
v+ v+ v, v+ v+ v+ v► h v► v► v+ v► v+ OF v+ a v► v+ m r D
z
c oCm
A M��azj>
A w W N IAN N A. O O p tW0 p awo -OD V V N 0=1 m� 0 D CA
i V w o �p O Of N V W to Ul N W A O Of W m .< M 0--1 V!
N V A IM A N A ti0 0 W O O O W O C
'- cn m
v
vi tw v► v+ v, v► 41� 411. + v vvv I T D
M g m O C
mi$�m.m
x,� mxi /�
n -
me ;am i 0 >
< 1D > Z D
Of 01 N Ol Of Vl OI w to A A A A A A A W O° v m C y Z ...�
O A w ION 00) i W N O w V Of A W i
O O M O to i Of N OD A O OVD N
N O O N 0) i -4 O A M W N -1 A N i N N m C 0
Z
v+ v► 40 v► v► vi a d, v► v► v► v► v► v, v► dt d! yr 0 m m C 3
� m 0 o N
z <vm --I
`D Om m 0 M
W N N N N N N N N i i i i i i i N W d m CO) ,'p
O t0 4 01 N A N i O f0 CD 01 Gn A W N O "Co `'C z -n �
i 00 6n W O OD 01 A N O CO V OI A W O O '•' O p •�
N A Co N OD Of A W A 01 to A t0 01 W O O
-n >
a 40 4110 40 4A 40 v► 40 as 40 40 v► v+ 40 VP a vi 40 C a r Z
C
m
tvii o
owD O vAi W N ONE i i i i �, ~ m m
A
i O O W OD N W O M.
to V iN o o t0 iN oD 01 01 V ao W W V Of 0 m i
OD V i w O A tO 01 A N Co 6r N O N Co W Z O
O e W i W N 2 2 2 O 2 W O CO V N �—f O
v► v► H vi v► vi v► v► v► v► vi v+ v+ v► v, 40 di v+
n�C� 611
o zz0)
-+ JCa o —C,
i N N W W W W A A A A A A W W W c 0 < O
W i Of -0 N W 0 V W W � � W N -+ W W 6n D D '4 In v
i i i Vl p o to op3 of
N A O A wO V -4 Z O CO N V CO O Ol W m N to D A
Co O -4 A N w Co 40 N Co W W Co N i A 0> w r'• 00
DC vt 00
;a (a
mm zO;am
n
C
0M o x0� Qyt
Dz �7�Czp Cr
my t°fil v10m
° O Cn o
Packet Page -1442-
Packet Page -1442-
110\
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Section 8
APPENDIX:
References
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
http: / /www.ada.gov/
Collier County
http: / /www.colliergov.net/
Land Development Code,
http: / /www.municode.com /library /librarv.aspx
Collier County Streetscape Master Plan
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =29
Construction in Public Rights -of -way Standards
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =1415
Golden Gate Area Master Plan
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.as2x ?page =257
Neighborhood Traffic Management Program
Collier County Transportation Services
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =570
Collier County Development and Environmental Services
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =103
Comprehensive Planning Section
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =96
Transportation Engineering & Construction Management
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =122
Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =1454
Metropolitan Planning Organization, M.P.O.
http : / /www.colliercountympo.com /
Pathways
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?page =1476
8 -1 12/2007
03/2011
Packet Page -1443-
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
http: // www. freshfromflorida .com /publications.html
Division of
"Urban Trees
Division of
"Grades and
"Grades and
Palms ", 3rd
Forestry
for Florida" September 1980
Plant Industry
Standards for Nursery
Standards for Nursery
edition, 1975
Florida Department of Transportation
F.D.O.T. Safety Home
http: / /www.dot.state.fl.us /safety/
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Plants ", 3rd edition 1973
Plants, Part II, Trees and
Walking Safety Brochures
http: / /www.dot.state.fl.us /safety /ped bike /brochures /ped bike bro
chures walking.sht
F.D.O.T. Maps & Publications
"Roadway and Traffic Design Standards"
"Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction"
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/mapsandpublications/
"Florida Highway Landscape Guide ", April, 1995
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/beauty/lanscap.pdf
Florida Irrigation Society
http: / /www.fisstate.org/
"Standards and Specifications for Turf and Landscape
Irrigation Systems ", February, 1996
Florida Nurserymen and Growers Association, F.N.G.A.
http: / /www.fngla.org /certifications /FCHP
"Florida Certified Horticulture Professional Manual"
South Florida Water Management District " Waterwise" Florida Landscapes
http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/publications/files/waterwise landscapes.
pdf
8 -2
Packet Page -1444-
12/2007
03/2011
11'�
/-111
/0-%,
S
is
M' 1e
M '-4Y SfP. Li -S.Y IMlIU1GiR M.is' -1.41 tYP. tC' -S✓
2
Od
A
�
T7
I
n
�
I
I
I
A
�1
.,
-
I
z
0
0
m
CD
C.
CD t
A
w
.
�
D
CD
0sn
0
6
�1
C
!
L
n
i
1'
�S
yy�
M' 1e
M '-4Y SfP. Li -S.Y IMlIU1GiR M.is' -1.41 tYP. tC' -S✓
T7
I
n
I
I
C
!
L
n
l
33
z
\ •
a
t�
x
U
?
z -a
�
z
V
1
•'
A
r=
�
4 9
I F
�o\
g�
L�
Eli
z
21W uNL
w x
a
AA AZ g
m g
CD
Ai?
0 o
D a
D
r
qa UNE
s 6,
y
1
a $
v � "
t8
L U L1NC
1$4 $
coven Gato ealaium Dft
Landscape Architecture «,a, UlmrWWorwikaMa W2Vorrikmeh s)
P. 0. Box 8052 pqy ,y
Naples, Florida 34101 wxwco m: n: mo,�crw,
;..1941283 -0486 E u1a. n "xn n.e
d r
fD
� I
� I
OrQ
m
� I
I � �
N �
A �
A
A`
O
O
N
CD
Q
n =�
ss
O S
t
I
I
CI
�4
Y'
D¢
F
V&' 1O lid KD4Vk f WA*
w f �uroc< Nf. a' -W 'f(P. in�5✓
a
�WIf4V
v
R
m
x
T
any,
€
3
N
jD
I
}and
�
v
t
D
�L
P
_uNE
P�Y! LANG
1-5
_
E
—
-
_Ysss
LA
te` sllZ
m
U
-
S-*
Dd
IN�gI
.
I
8
�
MT
p Y
gg
R
•nom
O
L I
/
/ •
i
Wit
�
�
V
`y" I
L
I
9
�
°.am4pL
�yx
f
E �'y
T
fez " ---- GWmGatoBmutdratmWW
:T:�
Landscape Architecture,:;.: �"
P. O. Box 8052 .mom 14' a wi and abed 2oa wilder medn�xl `�
L. fw�,
. Neplse, Plorda 34101 em AA'L.E: n: nrf: nn+ECrr
)941)263-0486 xir nn.n rxAow
a
v
R
m
x
T
3
N
jD
T
�
v
D
�L
P
_uNE
P�Y! LANG
m
U
-
S-*
Dd
IN�gI
.
fez " ---- GWmGatoBmutdratmWW
:T:�
Landscape Architecture,:;.: �"
P. O. Box 8052 .mom 14' a wi and abed 2oa wilder medn�xl `�
L. fw�,
. Neplse, Plorda 34101 em AA'L.E: n: nrf: nn+ECrr
)941)263-0486 xir nn.n rxAow
Wes
Landscape Architecture �; u•;;
(lhv6ed td awitlerand ebbed ZO a wider /`
P. s, for eo34 meJwl� cZ�{
Naples, Box 341D1 .mncn m. sr� °oa" Win, rondo
n o ect w.
(941 283 -0488 uts, M.sn. mwwae
Landscape Architecture awA0ed1°��"
F. O. Box 8082 n. QMlapbediCawidetallda�rbed20 aMdEf 11
Noplu, Flondo 34101 n. C.Y -Y am nw,ccr AM"
(941)'263- 8486'�+tt n.wn. wme
==1=1nds4cape Gb Architecture ... a�. (Qr6edmed�ls1968) pp . Bo :- 8052 °i` u core Ca+q Florw p� , Flondo 34101 ,nio co o: .'• `: r. c a 1(283 -0488 Ktaen.wn wio
�.Landscape GO B Architecture „.�„; 1.9
P.O. Box 9052 '(OIU�AI 16 b� -.X571
Naples, Florida 34101x w. Caar CO1tly Flan.
xut: aan,st: wTe:. marnw.
(9411263-0486 xts n.an ivcrss
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETING
October 5, 2011
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Development Services
Advisory Committee, having conducted business herein, met on this date at
3:00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room #610, Collier County
Growth Management Division/Planning & Regulation Office, 2800 North
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following Members present:
CHAIRMAN: William Varian
Vice Chair: David Dunnavant
Ray Allain
James Boughton
Clay Brooker
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Dalas Disney
Marco Espinar
Blair Foley
Reagan Henry
George Hermanson
David Hurst
Robert Where
Reed Jarvi
Mario Valle
ALSO PRESENT: Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, GMD Planning & Regulation
Judy Puig, Operations Analyst — Staff Liaison
Jamie French, Director — Operations & Regulatory Management
Jay Ahmad, P.E., Director — Transportation Engineering
Ed Riley, Fire Code Official — Fire Code Office
Nathan Beals, Project Manager — Public Utilities
Darryl Richard, Project Manager — Golden Gate MSTU
Michele Arnold, Director - Alternative Transportation Modes u
Packet Page -1451-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
I. Call to Order:
Chairman William Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00 PM and read the
procedures to be observed during the meeting.
A quorum was established. Thirteen members were present.
II. Approval of Agenda:
Marco Espinar moved to approve the Agenda as presented Second by George Hermanson
Carried unanimously, 13 — 0.
III. Approval of Minutes — September 7, 2011 Meeting:
Blair Foley moved to approve the Minutes for the September 7, 2011 meeting as
presented Second by Laura Spurgeon DeJohn. Carried unanimously, 12 — 0.
(Note: David Dunnavant did not vote because he did not attend the August meeting.)
IV. Public Speakers:
(None)
V. Growth Management Division — Staff Announcements/Uvdates:
A. Public Utilities Division: Nathan Beals, Project Manager — Public Utilities
• New policy: for Wastewater gravity mains — adding to "Standards" — to be
effective immediately
o Maximum depth: 10 feet
o Will be vetted and brought to DSAC at a future meeting
Comment:
David Dunnavant will pursue options (through other groups) concerning fire line
charges/billing issue.
(3:06 PM— Dalas Disney arrived.)
B. Fire Review: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official — Fire Code Office
• Monthly Activity Report for August was submitted.
o Plan Reviews conducted: 899 (July total — 807)
Comment:
Chairman Varian noted the Report cited 7.0 hours for two "overtime" reviews
and Contractors reimbursed the cost.
C. Transportation Planning Division: Jay Ahmad, P.E., Director — Transportation
Engineering
• Davis /Collier Project: Notice to Proceed was issued on September 26, 2011
o $30M construction project
• Oil Well Road (middle section): Board of County Commissioners awarded a
$13M Contract for safety improvements
o Designed improvements: .
• from 10 to 12 -foot lanes
• 5 -ft. shoulder on south side and 3 -ft. shoulder on north side
• Taylor Road (MSTU Project —Pine Ridge Industrial Park) —will recommend to
BCC to award $1.5M Contract to Quality Enterprises
Packet Page -1452-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
Blair Foley asked when the DOT Project at Davis would begin.
Mr. Ahmad replied the project is in the Final Design stage and ready to send to bid.
(3:09 PM— Robert Mulhere arrived.)
D. Planning and Regulation: Jamie French, Director — Operations & Regulatory
Management
• "CityView" —100% `Live' as of Monday, October 3
• Building Department applications have been rolled out
o There are approximately 50 issues — will work through
• "C/D- PLUS" — remains working in parallel
o New permits will no longer be issued
• Staff has been trained
Mr. French introduced Todd Zeiller, Dianna Perryman, and Claudine Auclair — Business
Center Manager. Todd Zeiller is a Principal Planner who will handle Site Development
Plans and Insubstantial Changes at the Business Center's Front Counter. The goal is to
reduce review time from 10 to 7 days.
•
Permit/Building Plan Reviews Statistics:
o "down" for September (figures not available until mid- month)
o Permits issued: from 2,000 to approximately 1,500
o Building Inspections: approximately 4,000 — scheduled times have not
been missed
o IVR ( "Interactive Voice Recognition" system): is running and fully
functional
• Land Development Statistics:
• Pre - Application Meetings: below 20
• Zoning: Letter Verification and Temporary Use Permits — increased
• SDP -A: "steady" but minimal in comparison to earlier years
Chairman Varian questioned the number of inspections completed per day per
Inspector.
Mr. French stated he will recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to
approve a contract with NOVA Engineering to hire a contract Inspector ; $100,000 has
been set aside in the budget for this purpose. He stated another option is to contact
former Inspectors (laid off) to work as needed.
Clay Brooker asked when the next LDC Amendments Cycle will begin.
Jamie French stated:
• White -Smith was hired to separate the Administrative Code from the Land
Development Code
n • Industry has vetted and noted several issues with the Code — CBIA has
submitted suggested Amendments
• A new Staff member (Caroline Brigham) was hired to "fast track" review
Packet Page -1453-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
October 5, 2011
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, GMD Planning & Regulation:
• New Code Book should be completed by the end of the month
• Will be distributed to DSAC for review and comments
• Met with Industry and various groups in forum settings
• Asked DSAC to think about what "makes sense" for Administrative Process
• Code will not solve every situation and must be as flexible as possible -
there is no "magic bullet"
• Checks and balances are necessary - a single Staff member should not be
allowed final approval on Administrative variance application - too
excessive
• Sending every variance application through Planning Commission and the
BCC is too cumbersome
• Staff: Will research and review of "Best Practices" from other Counties
• Proposals:
• County Engineer, Zoning Director, and County Attorney will sign off
on Administrative variance (with Notice)
• Place Administrative variance on Consent Agenda for BCC - allowing
public to comment during BCC meeting
• Hearing Examiner to review application at Hearing ( "transparency ")
• Abbreviated Planning Commission review (with published Notice)
Bob Mulhere stated Bonita Springs and Lee County have "a wide spectrum of
Administrative approvals."
• Goal: time frame - 30 to 45 days
• Suggested co- presentation (Staff and DSAC) to BCC
• After Book has been reviewed for errors /omissions, it will be distributed to
DSAC during December
• Presentation to BCC - scheduled for January 2012
Mr. Casalanguida requested DSAC members to focus not only on the LDC
Amendments but also on making the Administrative Process as "nimble" as possible.
Dalas Disney stated he received emails concerning LDC which attributed changes to a
"scrivener's error."
Q. Since it has been a long time since the re- codification - at what point is the
"scrivener's error" considered to be a change?
A. The County Attorney's position is if the error was just found, it is still a scrivener's
error - it was overlooked during a previous review.
Re: "CUO -liew"
Q. Is the Portal functioning - can I look at my review comments no?
A. (Jamie French) If the Permit was issued in "City View" - yes - but not if it was
issued in "C/D- PLUS." "CityView" permit applications begin with an Alpha prefix.
Packet Page -1454-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17
October 5, 2011
David Dunnavant noted "C/D- PLUS" was able to recognize previously entered PL
numbers but "CityView" does not. He asked if the programming could be revised or
adapted to recognize the numbers.
Jamie French stated no. He further stated the "C/D -Plus" legacy will always exist but
it could not be brought over.
Mr. Dunnavant stated "C/D -Plus" brings up all 2011 Permit application numbers and
he can pick the one he needs but with "City View," he must remember the number
assigned to particular permit.
Claudine Auclair, Business Center Manager, stated she would research the issue and
report to DSAC at a future meeting.
Mr. Dunnavant questioned Mr. French concerning the Plan Review process and the
anticipated reduced time frames.
Nick Casalanguida explained Staff's perspective regarding changes, i.e, SDP -A or
SDP -I, if only a form is needed, the application will not be routed again to all reviewers
- "judgment calls" will be made.
He further stated the website will contain information concerning the re- submittal
process.
Jamie French stated "SIRE" and the other programs should be fully functional and in
place by the end of the first quarter of 2012.
Re: Contractor Licensing
Chairman Varian asked if there was a Portal or place for a license holder to check
^ concerning his business /occupational license or insurance status.
Jamie French stated the County could internally — he will research the issue and report
to DSAC at a future meeting.
Chairman Varian questioned the support services (i.e., facilities, IT, legal) paid to
other departments and the amounts for same in the Budget. He requested a presentation
of the information at a future meeting.
(Chairman Varian noted Mr. Riley was present)
V. Growth Management Division — Staff Announcements/Updates:
B. Fire Review: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official — Fire Code Office
• August was the busiest month in the past two years. Turn - around times were
maintained.
• Some Contractors needed overnight reviews and were willing to pay for the
expedited service.
VI. Old Business:
A. Golden Gate MSTU Master Plan — Darryl Richard, MSTU Project Manager
(A copy of the proposed, revised Beautification Master Plan for the Golden Gate
MSTU was distributed to the Members.)
• Master Plan contains a great deal of operational information
o Example cited: thematic paver pattern (color- coded) for narrow
medians where landscaping is not appropriate
• Purpose: Update /address the cost estimates to complete the Hunter and
Coronado Parkway projects — the original figures were not relevant
Packet Page -1455-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
Mr. Richard noted a comment made during DSAC's September meeting:
• There was a concern regarding the MSTU Advisory Committee's request to
the BCC for an opportunity to review and provide recommendations for
proposed development landscape plans in order to share coordination with the
Community's roadway landscape master plan.
He explained the purpose of the MSTU Committee's request was not to add steps to
the SDP Review process but to allow input on the relevant portions of a Site
Development Plan that was within the MSTU's boundaries. He assured the DSAC
members the request would not add any steps to the existing Site Development Plan
review process.
Clay Brooker referenced "Summary and Recommendations for County Codes" —
specifically the phrase "should monitor and be permitted ...." His concern was after an
SDP was submitted, another "body" would be able to review it.
Michele Arnold, Director - Alternative Transportation Modes, stated the purpose
of the statement was to allow for coordination between the Master Plan and any
development within the Golden Gate Parkway area. She stated the wording may be
awkward because the intent was not conveyed and suggested it should be re- written.
Dalas Disney referred to:
• Page 4 -2, "the Right of Way should be guided by" — he suggested substituting
"shall."
• Page 5 -3, under "Roadway and Pedestrian Decorative Lighting" — "....
Installation should be reviewed ...." He again suggested substituting the word
"shall."
Michele Arnold stated a word search of the document will be performed and each
instance where "should" was found will be analyzed.
Page 7 -4, "Table 10"
Dalas Disney noted operating costs automatically increased at 3% per year.
which he stated was a substantial amount for 17 years. He asked for an
explanation, and reiterated his comment from the September meeting:
Q. Is not the goal to reduce the MSTU tax, long -term and reduce burden to the
public now that the area is built out?
Michele Arnold replied the intent was to review the maintenance schedule for the
roadways and to reduce the millage after the construction projects were completed. In
Golden Gate, there is a continuing maintenance responsibility for interior roadways.
She noted the Committee implemented alternative planting designs to reduce the costs.
She stated the consultant may not have estimated the costs appropriately for the years
cited. The actual cost is determined by the bids received on an annual basis.
Mr. Disney objected to the use of the "baseline" approach and automatic annual
increases.
Ms. Arnold noted the figures have decreased on an annual basis and stated the
comments were noted and the consultant will be asked to review the figures.
Packet Page -1456-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
George Hermanson objected to changing the language — "should" versus "shall" —
asked if the document was intended to be adopted as an Ordinance or a Master Plan.
He continued Master Plans have recommendations, not "hard and fast rules." He also
suggested revising the paragraph on Page 3 -28 and restricting the Committee's
purview solely to just the area or areas contained within the MSTU district.
Michele Arnold clarified the Master Plan is adopted by reference in the LDC and is
intended to be a guide — not a Code. The title of the section is "Summary of
Recommendations for County Codes."
Chairman Varian asked Mr. Richard if a recommendation to the BCC was required.
(His comments were made off -mike — not audible.)
Clay Brooker moved to recommend approving the proposed Golden Gate Community
Roadways Beautification Master Plan as revised, except for the previously
referenced paragraph on Page 3 -28 which is to be clarified Staff should be advised
the paragraph exists and it should be consulted during their review(s) of SDP
submittals that affect areas within the Golden Gate MSTU. Second by Mario Valle.
(Comments by an unidentified speaker were made off -mike and not audible)
Michele Arnold: "It is addressed on an annual basis."
Chairman Varian called for a vote. Carried unanimously, 15 — 0.
VII. New Business:
• Chairman Varian noted six Committee members were notified that their terms
will expire on December 14''. The members may reapply for their positions.
Information and forms will be available on the County's website..
• Judy Puig stated large documents will be posted on the website for review by the
DSAC Committee members. Members will be notified via email when a document
has been posted.
VIII. Committee Member Comments:
• David Dunnavant inquired about the Health Department Septic Standards. He
asked if the new Standards from the State were implemented.
• Mario Valle noted the new Standards were implemented and will be adhered to
until notified by the State.
• Judy Puig stated she emails to Kenneth Rech on a monthly basis but his response
has been "there is nothing to report."
• Consensus: An update is necessary and Mr. Rech will be requested to appear.
Next Meeting Dates: (Meetings will commence at 3:00 PM unless noted below.)
November 2, 2011
n December 7, 2011
January 4, 2012
February 1, 2012
Packet Page -1457-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
October 5, 2011
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned
by order of the Chairman at 4:02 PM.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
The Minutes were approved by the Board /Committee on
"as submitted" L_J OR "as amended" r].
Packet Page -1458-
2011,
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
COMMRTEE
2885 Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Fl- 34104
!I11�i .�►kI
MINUTES
I. Call to order
The meeting was called to order at 4:09 p.m. by Richard Sims, Chairman.
A quorum was established.
II. Attendance
Members: Richard Sims, Pat Spencer, Peggy Harris, Barbara Segura
(Excused), Michael McElroy (Excused)
County: Darryl Richard — MSTU Project Manager, Pamela Lulich —
Landscape Operations Manager
Others: Michael McGee — McGee & Associates, Manny Gonzalez - Hannula,
Richard Tindell — JRL Design, Sue Flynn — Juristaff
All documentation was submitted to Stalf prior to meeting and was provided to
the Advisory Committee and other attendees with an overhead proiection screen
to help provide a paperless environment via MSTU's request.
III. Approval of Agenda
Pat Spencer moved to approve the July 12, 2011 Agenda as submitted.
Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried 3 -0.
IV. Approval of Minutes — May 10, 2011
Richard Sims moved to approve the May 10, 2011 Minutes as submitted
Second by Peggy Harris. Motion carried 3 -0.
V. Transportation Operations Report
^ A. Monthly Budget Report
Packet Page -1459-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Darryl Richard distributed the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU Fund
153 Report dated July 12, 2011. (See attached)
• Ad Valorem Tax Collected - $262,784.09
• Operating Expense Available - $76,285.59
• Improvement General Available - $404,910.19
• Purchase Orders Paid - $580,764.22
He provided the Fiscal Year 11 Carry Forward Analysis by Fund Report.
(See attached)
B. Project Manager Report
Darryl Richard reported a potential Change Order Number 2 for Coronado
Parkway and Hunter Boulevard, Phase II Median Landscape and Irrigation,
Installation Bid Number 10 -5595.
He stated the Contractor encountered subsurface rock material and will
install HDPE. He provided an estimate from Hannula Landscaping in the
amount of $3,161.60 dated July 11, 2011. (See attached)
Discussion was made on why a rock flaw clause was not included in the
Contract and the amount of footage involved. Instead of bidding the whole
project dealing with subsurface rock material, it was explained the bid
would have been $20,000 - $40,000 higher. The footage involved was
estimated at 525' around the curb.
Staff stated Road & Bridge plan to resurface Hunter & Coronado
next fiscal year and suggested this would be the time for the Committee to
make recommended revisions on restriping to give more room for
pedestrians or vehicles.
Richard Sims placed a 1 -month time limit for the Committee to address
any changes for the restriping of Hunter & Coronado.
Darryl Richard reported Hannula Landscaping estimate is being reviewed
and should not exceed $5,000. It was noted the project is 100 days ahead of
schedule.
C. Master Plan — Final Approval for submittal to BCC
Darryl Richard reported revisions to the Master Plan included the
tweaking language and updated cost factors and miscellaneous items for
projects. (The updated cost factors are on page 103 in the PDF format.)
He provided the draft Executive Summary for recommendation to approve
the Golden Gate Communities Roadway Beautification Master Plan
revisions for approval from the BCC. (See attached)
Richard Sims moved to direct Staff to submit the "revised" Master Plan to
the BCC for approval Second by Pat Spencer. Motion carried 3 -0.
W
2
Packet Page -1460-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Staff commended Peggy Harris for her volunteer service time to
11—IN Collier County since 2004 and will receive a Service Award from the BCC
on July 26th.
Pam Lulich reported the receipt of a proposal from Hannula Landscaping to
replace 2 gate valves on clocks for release of pressure build up and repair
main line by the bridge in the amount of $1,838.
Richard Sims stated the Committee had budgeted for a replacement pump
with variable frequency drives.
Staff responded the installation is for during the interim. Staff will move
forward on the quote.
VI. Transportation Maintenance Report — Hannula — None.
VII. Landscape Architects Report — JRL
Richard Tindell provided the Landscape Architect's Field Report dated July 7,
2011. (See attached) He reported the following:
• The Beach Sunflower on Collier is very sparse and weeds under control.
• Crown -of -thorn beds along Collier have not been attended to.
• One tree and several clumps of ornamental grasses on the north side of
the bridge by Tropicana are dead.
• There are no signs of repair work at the bridge irrigation crossing.
• A dead palmetto, ilex and juniper on Collier should be replaced.
• All planting areas continue to need trimming to meet County and FDOT
standards.
VIII. Landscape Architects Report — McGee & Associates
A. Hunter & Coronado — Addressed previously V.B.
IX. Old Business
Pat Spencer presented the Pathway Advisory Committee's Proposed Asphalt
Pathway's 5 -Year Plan for the Golden Gate Advisory Committee's review and
recommendations.
Discussion was ensued on the proposed pathways, MPO Grant, short cut
pedestrian bridges to keep automotive traffic out and pedestrians safer. Staff
indicated an engineer would need to design pedestrian bridges.
It was suggested to prioritize the pathways.
X. New Business — None.
XI. Public Comments
Concerns were expressed on Mike McElroy attendance record. Staff will send a
notice.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned at 5:08 P.M.
Packet Page -1461-
12/13/2011 Item 16.A.17.
Golden Gate MSTU Advisory Committee 11�
Richard Sims, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Committee/Board on
as presented or amended
The next meeting is scheduled for August 9, 2011
4:00 PM at Golden Gate Community Center -
Naples, FL
4
Packet Page -1462-