Loading...
Agenda 07/26/2011 Item # 8A7/26/2011 Item 8.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RZ- PL2009 -25: The Gordon River Greenway Park — an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County- Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with an ST Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) with an ST Overlay, Commercial intermediate (C -3). Residential Multi -Family District 6 IRMF -6(3)) and Residential Multi- Family District 6 IRMF -6(3)] with ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park; and by providing an effective date. The 123.6 + /- acre subject property° is located on the cast side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) and south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886), in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County , Florida. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this rezone petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner proposes to rezone the subject site to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP). The proposed Gordon River Greenway Park is a passive park with water quality systems and passive recreation amenities located in an ecological trail corridor. The land is owned bv_ Collier County except the southern portion ofthe project is proposed on parcels of land owned by Conservation Collier. It is important to understand that a conventional rezoning request is being pursued rather than a rezoning to a PUD (Planned Unit Development). This is a result of a grant that has been received from the Trust for Public Land. which requires that the subject propern not have the flexibility that is sometimes associated with a PUD designation. Therefore, the decision was made to apply for a conventional rezoning to (P) with limited uses in order to comply with grant requirements. The proposed GRGP project is the second in a series of Collier County projects designed to create the Gordon River Greenway. a unique passive park along with a water qualith- system to mitigate and reduce pollution levels in Gordon River and downstream surface waters that flow into Naples Bay. within the Naples /Collier urban area. The GRGP site is being designed to result in two distinct park development areas: a parking lot near the zoo located to the southwest with ingress /evress provisions through a loop roadway orisinating at the Fleischmann Boulevard /Good Iette -Frank Road intersection; and a parking lot near to the northeast with ingressiegres; provisions through a future north /south access roadway Packet Page -20- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. originating at Golden Gate Parkway and adjacent to the Bear's Paw golf course. It is noted that the design. permitting and construction of these access roadways to serve the two park development areas are not part of the GRGP project scope herein. Collier County will be providing access to the two development areas pursuant to several developer contribution agreements. Primary components of the GRGP project are generally depicted on the overall site concept plan which accompanies this rezone application and are expected to include: - Stonmwater dry detention treatment areas and bio- retention swales - Water control structures - Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian walkways. pavilions and boardwalks - Fishing platform - Parking. including shared parking.. facilities - Designated environmental preserve areas - Restroom facilities - Pedestrian bridues - Connection points to access roadways by others - Park maintenance building - Canoe /kayak launch facility at the Gordon River - Gopher Tortoise Preserve - Site landscaping - Best management improvements to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. FISCAL IMPACT: The rezone bN and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project. at build out. will maximize its authorized level of development. However. if the rezone is approved. a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. .Additionally in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management. the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees collected were not included in the criteria used b\ staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Packet Page -21- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the Countvwide Future Land Use Map, and is within the Coastal High Hazard .Area. This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non - residential uses.. including parks, recreational facilities, and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Public Use District (P) is intended to accommodate government facilities that provide essential services, including parks and recreational services facilities. Furthermore. the proposed use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) via Policy 5.5. which encourages the planning for expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands that are designated for urban intensit} uses. Comprehensive Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has found it consistent with the applicable policies of the FLUE. A detailed analysis of the project's consistency with the FLUE is contained in the attached Staff Report. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning Staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 -vear planning period. Therefore. the subject application can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): The EAC (Environmental Advisory Council) recommends denial, however, staff supports the petition since it complies with all GIMP and LDC requirements. Please see "Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Staff Report' for further information. Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezoning may be found consistent with the FLUE and the other applicable elements of the GMP. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EACI RECOMMENDATION: The EAC heard this petition on May 4, 2011, and recommended denial of the proposed project due in part because the site impacts are located within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay and Conservation zoning designation. The ST overlay requires an ST permit in order to impact environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed alteration or development within the 63.47 acre ST Overlay area will require review before the EAC. CCPC. and BCC approval unless the proposal meets any of the Exceptions from public hearing requirements in LDC 4.02.14. H. The EAC has reviewed a proposed alteration of 5.65 acres with a recommendation for denial. If the proposed alterations are reduced to five (5) acres or less, the planting services director may administratively approve the site alteration or site development plan for land designated ST without a public hearing. If further public hearings are required for the ST Permit, the hearings will be scheduled at the time of Site Development Plan submittal. (See LDC 4.02.14. F.2.) Packet Page -22- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: This item was heard by the CCPC at the June 2. 2011 hearing. and by a vote of 7 -1 (with Commissioner Caron dissenting as described below) recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Treatment swales shall be added to walking trails. 2. The preserve area shall remain at 22 acres. 3. Fifn percent or greater of the parking stalls shall be grassed parking. It should be noted that Subsection 4.05.02 B.2. of the LDC (Collier County Land Development Code) oniv allows churches and schools to have more than fifty percent grass parking. However, the BCC may allow the proposed park to have fifty percent grass parking. Therefore. Condition 3 is subject to the approval of the BCC. Commissioner Caron had the dissenting vote with the following concerns: 1. The applicant should address the issues bought up by the EAC and the petition should go back to the EAC for their reconsideration. 2. Justification for the number of and type (primary use, grassed, non - grassed) of parking spaces should be provided. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with an ST Overlay. Conservation (CON). Conservation (CON) with an ST Overlay. Commercial Intermediate (C -3), Residential Multi - Family District 6 IRMF -6(3)] and Residential Multi - Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with an ST Overlay Zoning District to the Public Use (P) Zoning District with an ST overlay. The attached staff report and recommendations of the Planning Commission required are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. and you may question Petitioner_ or staff, to satisfi yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to assure that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for Straight Rezones 1. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals. objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? Packet Page -23- 7/2612011 Item 8.A. 3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? 5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? 6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses. because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic. including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public saO.i 8. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? 13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning? 14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any, of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. What is the impact of development on the availobilit'v atadequate public facilities services rvices consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. IOn. art.1I], as amended? Packet Page -24- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 18. Are there other factors. standards. or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health. safety, and welfare? The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney "s Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. An affinnative vote of four is necessary for Board approval -ST)A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for RZ- PL2009- 25. the Gordon River Greenway Park subject to staffs and the CCPC conditions of approval. which have been incorporated into the attached ordinance. PREPARED BY: Nanev Gundlach. Principal Planner. Land Development Services Growth Management Division. Planning and Regulation Attachments: I ) Staff Report 2) Application S) EAC (Environmental Advisory Committee) Staff Report 4) TIS (Traffic Impact Statement) 5) Ordinance Packet Page -25- COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: S.A. 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. RZ- PL2009 -25: The Gordon River Greenway Park - an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with an ST Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) with an ST Overlay, Commercial Intermediate (C -3), Residential Multi - Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] and Residential Multi- Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park; and by providing an effective date. The 123.6 + /- acre subject property is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) and south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886), in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 2S East, Collier County, Florida. Meeting Date: 7/26/2011 Prepared By Name: GundlachNanc� Title: Planner, Principal-Comprehensive Planning 6/1/2011 2:05:28 PM Approved By Name: BellowsRav Title: Manager - Planning. Comprehensive Planning Date: 6/29/2011 5:35:08 PM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst. CDES Date: 6/30/3011 10:10:44 AM Name: BellowskaN Packet Page -26- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Title: Manager - Planning. Comprehensive Planning Date: 630/2011 11:50:40 AM Name: WilliamsSteven Title: Assistant Countv Attorney.County Attornev Date: 7/1 /201 1 8:53:36 AM Name: FederNorman Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div.Transportati Date: 7/1/2011 1:9:07 PM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transpottation Planning Date: 7/5/2011 9:19:17 AM Name: WilliamsSteven Title: Assistant Counn Attorney.County Attotne} Date: 7/6/2011 8:06:33 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney. Date: 7/15/2011 4:0437 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs.CMO Date: 7/18/2011 10:40:59 AM Name: lsacksonMark Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs.CMO Date: 7/18/2011 11:36:27 AM Packet Page -27- 7/2612011 Item 8.A. AGENDA ITEM 9-A Cofer County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: NNE 2, 2011 SUBJECT: PETITION: RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK PROPERTY OWNER/AGENTS: Applicant: Marla Ramsey, Collier County Public Services Administrator Parks and Recreation Department 1500 Livingston Road Naples, FL 34109 Property Owner: Collier County and Conservation Collier 3299 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: J.P Marchland, P.E. Kimley -Horn and Associates 2601 Cattleman Road, Suite 200 Sarasota, FL 34232 The petitioner wishes to rezone 123.6± acres from the Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with a ST (Special Treatment) Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) with a ST Overlay, Commercial Intermediate (C -3), Residential Multi - Family District 6 with a cap of 3 units per acre [RMF -6(3)] and Residential Multi - Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with a ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP). Portions of the property are also located within Special Treatment Overlay for well fields with designations of ST/W -1, ST/W -2, ST/W -3 and ST/W -4, which requires land uses that reduce the potential for groundwater contamination. A companion request for a ST Permit in conjunction with this rezoning request has also been made in order to impact areas within the ST Overlay. RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page r of 18 Revised 577 -11 Packet Page -28- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Packet Page -29- a Q O z z O N a z O Q O NI m O N, J ai Na •I 2' O. w a mMw S 3� 3a Ma i EE cCa p Z` o,ou wmwvi 011 dg y Ep auo aovw L"I � � a If a I t IF �9a wa or Mrx= Packet Page -29- a Q O z z O N a z O Q O NI m O N, J ai Na •I 2' O. w a (i V W V o I I I � I a�l�I —7 =Q ,I un iidY Yh e I I i35 I E� a 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Packet Page -30- U g wa n� ¢Z WU O a ¢g> 05 OZ MW D z 1 �s. se a o I s @ gFg 3 NN�°N�soij dri sy I L qai Packet Page -30- U g wa n� ¢Z WU O a ¢g> 05 OZ MW D z 1 �s. 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 123.6- acre property is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) and south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886), in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See illustration on preceeding page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: As described in the narrative statement included in the application, the petitioner proposes to rezone the subject site to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP). The proposed Gordon River Greenway Park is a passive park with water quality systems and passive recreation amenities located in an ecological trail corridor. The land is owned by Collier County except the southern portion of the project is proposed on parcels of land owned by Conservation Collier (see labels on the preceeding Site Concept Plan) As depicted on the preceeding "Overall Project Site Concept Plan," is generally bounded on the north by Golden Gate Parkway and a vacant residential multi - family parcel owned by Caribbean Ventures LLC; to the east by a currently vacant residential parcel owned by Caribbean Ventures LLC, by the Bear's Paw Country Club, by the Golden Gate Canal and by the Naples Airport; to the west by the Naples Zoo, The Conservanc-v of Southwest Florida, the Gordon River and a vacant residential parcel: a vacant non - agricultural parcel and Goodlette Arms, LLC; and, to the south by the Gordon River and The Commons Professional Park. The subject site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C -3, A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 82 -2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. It is important to understand that a conventional rezoning request is being pursued rather than a rezoning to a PUD (Planned Unit Development). This is a result of a grant that has been received from the Trust for Public Land, which requires that the subject property not have the flexibility that is sometimes associated with a PUD designation. Therefore, the decision was made to apply for a conventional rezoning to P with limited uses in order to comply with grant requirements. The proposed GRGP project is the second in a series of Collier County projects designed to create the Gordon River Greenway, a unique passive park along with a water quality system to mitigate and reduce pollution levels in Gordon River and downstream surface waters that flow into Naples Bay, within the Naples /Collier urban area. The GRGP site is being designed to result in two distinct park development areas: a parking lot near the zoo located to the southwest with ingress /egress provisions through a loop roadway originating at the Fleischmann Boulevard /Goodlette -Frank Road intersection: and a parking lot near to the northeast with ingress /egress provisions through a future north /south access roadway RZ- Pt2009 -25. GORTON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 4 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -31- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. originating at Golden Gate Parkway and adjacent to the Bear's Paw golf course. It is noted that the design, permitting and construction of these access roadways to serve the two park development areas are not part of the GRGP project scope herein. Collier County will be providing access to the two development areas pursuant to several developer contribution agreements. Primary components of the GRGP project are generally depicted on the overall site concept plan which accompanies this rezone application and are expected to include: - Stormwater dry detention treatment areas and bio-retention swales - Water control structures - Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian walkways, pavilions and boardwalks - Fishing platform - Parking, including shared parking, facilities - Designated environmental preserve areas - Restroom facilities - Pedestrian bridges - Connection points to access roadways by others - Park maintenance building - Canoe/kayak launch facility at the Gordon River - Gopher Tortoise Preserve - Site landscaping - Best management improvements to enhance water quality from Stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Golden Gate Parkway, then Freedom Park, Caribbean Gardens Zoo, and single - family residential development, which have a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with a ST (Special Treatment) Overlay, RMF-6, and Commercial Intermediate (C -3) East: Golf course, single- family, multi - family development, and an airport, which have a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with a ST Overlay, Planned Unit Development (PUD), City of Naples Zoning District PD and General Commercial (C-4) South: vacant undeveloped land, the Conservancy of South West Florida, and office buildings which have a zoning designation of Commercial Intermediate (C -3), Conservation (CON), CON with a ST Overlay, and City of Naples Zoning District PD West: Gordon River, vacant undeveloped land, offices, single - family, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida and the Carribean Gardens Zoo, which have a zoning RZ- Pt2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 5 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -32- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. designation of Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture with a ST Overlay, Conservation (CON), CON with ST Overlay, Residential Single - family (RSF4), RSF-4 with a ST Overlay, Residential Multi - family (RMF -6 and RMF -16) and City of Naples Zoning District PD and C4 RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 6 of 18 Revised 5.17 -11 Packet Page -33- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GNP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area. This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non - residential uses, including parks, recreational facilities, and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Public Use District (P) is intended to accommodate government facilities that provide essential services, including parks and recreational services facilities. Furthermore, the proposed use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) via Policy 5.5, which encourages the planning for expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands that are designated for urban intensity uses. Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Objective 3 states: "Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the maintenance of existing public facilities and beach renourishment, and may include beach, shore and waterway access." In addition Policy 3.3 states: "The County shall continue to support public access to beaches, shores and waterways." (The proposed park would include and allow public access to the Gordon River through a system of pedestrian trails that features bridges over the river, and direct access to the Gordon River through a kayak launch facility.) Recreation and Open Space (ROSE) OBJECTIVE 1.3 states that: "Continue to ensure that all public developed recreational facilities, open space and beaches and public water bodies are accessible to the general public." (The proposed Rezone request is to allow a public park intended for passive recreational uses and amenities that includes a system of pedestrian trails and public access to the Gordon River through a kayak launch area.) ROSE OBJECTIVE 1.6 states that: "Whenever possible and practical, utilize County owned property for recreational uses." (The public park is proposed on County owned property.) Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) OBJECTIVE 10.2 states: "The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition." (The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10.2.3 and 10.2.4.) Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) OBJECTIVE 122 states: "The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re- building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; (Criterion met. The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10.2.3 and 10.2.4. Additionally, the applicant sustains that the proposed habitable structures will be built at a minimum RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 7 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -34- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. finished floor elevation of 7 fee; which is the minimum elevation required for the subject property by the current FEMA Flood Zone Base Flood Elevation (AE7) map.) b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; (Criterion met. The proposed project site retains existing wetlands and proposes opens space that will serve as a wildfire protective Zone. In this regard; these strategies are consistent with those included in the "Wildfire Mitigation In Florida land Use Planning Strategies and Best Management Practices "published by the Florida Department of Community Affairs.) c. installation of on -site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; (Criterion not applicable. The applicant sustains that emergency power generators are not necessary./or the proposed park structures. Staff is of the opinion that this criterion is not applicable because the proposed structures will not serve as public emergency shelters.) d. beach and dune restoration. re- nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events; (Criterion met. The applicant sustains that this criterion is not applicable. However, staff is of the opinion that "protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events" is a criterion that must be addressed. In this regard, the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code include requirements that addresses this criterion.) e. emergency road repairs; (Criterion met. The applicant notes that the proposed project minimizes the amount of road construction through the use of shared access points and parking areas.) f. repair and /or replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls, etc." (Criterion met. The applicant states that publicly owned facilities will be designed to industry and County standards to minimize maintenance and repair needs.) Based upon the above analysis of proposed uses, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD amendment consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning Staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 -year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Transportation Planning Staff offers the following: Goodlette Frank Road Impacts The first concurrency link that is impacted by this zoning amendment is Link 26.0, Goodlette- Frank Road (CR -951) between Golden Gate Boulevard and US-41. The proposed amendment generates only 11 additional p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips. which represents a 0.31 percent impact on Immokalee Road. This segment of Goodlette Frank Road currently has a remaining RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 8 of 18 Revised 5.17 -11 Packet Page -35- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. capacity of 1,478 trips, and is currently at LOS 'B" (Level of Service `B ") as reflected by the 2010 AUIR (Annual Urban Inventory Report). Golden Gate Parkway .Impacts: The next concurrency link that is impacted by this zoning amendment is Link 19.0, Golden Gate Parkway from Goodlette -Frank Road to Airport Road. The proposed amendment generates only 21 additional p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 0.48 percent impact on Golden Gate Parkway. This segment of Golden Gate Parkway currently has a remaining capacity of 1,088 trips, and is currently at LOS "C" (Level of Service "C ") as reflected by the 2010 AUIR (Annual Urban Inventory Report). No subsequent concurrency links are significantly impacted by this proposed project. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Please see Attachment A: "Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Staff Report." ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and has reviewed the criteria on which a determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.03.05.H. of the LDC. The staff evaluation establishes a factual basis to support the recommendations of staff. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) uses these same criteria as the basis for the recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. T}ansnortation Review: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and is recommending approval. Environmental Review: Environmental Services Department Staff has reviewed the petition to address any environmental concerns. This petition was required to submit Environment Data and was heard by the Environmental Advisory Commission (EAC) on May 4, 2011. The EAC recommended denial of the proposed project due in part because the site impacts are located within a Special Treatment (ST) overlay and Conservation zoning designation (see below). The ST overlay requires a companion ST permit in order to impact environmentally sensitive areas as discussed below: Special Treatment 1ST) Zoning Overlay.— companion item PL 2011 -677 The proposed project has a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay district designation on approximately 63.47± acres of the overall 123.6- acre project site. As a companion to the subject rezone request, an ST permit application is being reviewed as part of the public hearing process. Section 2.03.07.D. of the Land Development Code states the purpose and intent of the ST overlay district, and reads as follows: "Within the County there are certain areas, which because of their RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 9 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -36- 7/26/2011 Item &A unique assemblages of flora and/or fauna, their aesthetic appeal, historical or archaeological significance, rarity in the County, or their contribution to their own and adjacent ecosystems, make them worthy of special regulations. Such regulations are directed toward the conservation. protection, and preservation of ecological and recreational values for the greatest benefit to the people of the County........ The purpose of the "ST" district is to assure the preservation and maintenance of these environmental and cultural resources......." Including temporary impacts, the total proposed altered area within the ST overlay district is 5.68± acres (9 percent), with 1.81± acres of that being proposed impervious area. Temporary impacts include a two -foot wide temporary construction impact area along both outside edges of the boardwalk, a total of 12 feet of temporar) construction impact along the asphalt trails, and potential excavation for utility piping /tie -in. Within the ST overlay area. the following are proposed: • The Northeast Development Node with its associated restroom, maintenance storage building, pavilion, parking, stormwater treatment areas, landscaping, and ancillary facilities. • Passive park amenities such as recreational multipurpose pedestrian/bicycle trails, boardwalks, associated shade structures, and lighting. • Fishing platform. • A water quality treatment facility to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. • Utility piping for water, sewer. and stormwater. • Pedestrian bridge. • Exotic plant removal. The design of the project has minimized wetland impacts by locating the parking area within wetlands of poor quality and as close to Golden Gate Parkway as possible. The overall proposed GRGP project includes over 100- acres of undeveloped upland and wetland habitats, including a 22.2- acre preservation area. As a result of the proposed project, approximately 91 percent of the ST overlay area will remain unaltered except for the removal of exotic plants. Therefore, staff is in agreement with the applicant in stating that "the project will achieve the conservation goals envisioned with the original designation of a general conservation ST Overlay in this area." Final action on the site alteration plan requested with the Special Treatment Permit lies with the Board of County Commissioners. Conservation (CON) Zoninz As stated in section 2.03.09.B. of the Land Development Code (LDC), the purpose and intent of the Conservation District (CON) district is "to conserve, protect and maintain vital natural resource lands within unincorporated Collier County that are owned primarily by the public.... It is the intent of the CON District to require review of all development proposed within the CON District to ensure that the inherent value of the County's natural resources is not destroyed or RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 10 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -37- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. unacceptably altered. The CON District corresponds to and implements the conservation land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP." To provide a brief history of the property, the site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C -3, A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 82 -2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. The applicant has requested that the CON zoning designation be rezoned to P (Public Use) zoning designation for use as a public park. The gopher tortoise in this area will be required to be relocated prior to impacts in accordance with the FFWCC regulations. Stormwater Management Review: Stormwater Management Review Staff (Engineering) has reviewed this petition and has not voiced any concerns or offered any comments. Utilities Review: Public utilities staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection. According to the current 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates, the project location is not within the Collier County Water - Sewer District Service Area. This petition is located within the City of Naples water and service area. The City of Naples has reviewed the subject site and will allocate water and sewer service when the future development of the property has received final City approval. Zoninz and Land Development Review: According to LDC Section 2.03.05 AA.a., the park, recreational service facilities and parking amenities are permitted uses in the P zoning designation. Zoning Staff has evaluated the uses proposed and their intensities; the development standards such as building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers; the amount and type of open space and its location; and traffic generation/attraction of the proposed uses. In addition to residential and PUD zoning. the subject property is primarily surrounded by agricultural zoning on three sides —north, east and west as well as residential and City of Naples PD zoning. To the north and west the lands are developed with the Freedom Park, the Carribean Gardens Zoo and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida as well as residential and office uses. To the east is a golf course, the Golden Gate Canal, residential uses and the Naples Airport. Most of the proposed trails are internal to a heavily vegetated site and will have little impact to the surrounding properties. The proposed parking areas are located adjacent to public and private access ways. If the rezoning is approved, the developer will be required to provide the minimum landscape buffers as provided for in the LDC in effect when future development is sought. At the present time, proposed parking areas would that abut access ways would be required to provide a Type D buffer, which is a 20 -foot wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center and a 2 -foot height hedge. The P zoning designation allows 35 -foot height buildings. While the GRGP will be open during daylight hours only, there will lighting. RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 11 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -38- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. The chart below compares the site development criteria of the existing zoning districts (RT and CON) and the proposed zoning district (P). Excerpts from LDC Site Design Standards Tables (LDC Section 4.02.01.A) Zoning District Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Lot Area Lot Width Building Height Setback Setback Setback Maximum Public 50' 50' 50' None None 35' CON 50 50 50 5 acres 150 35 RSF -4 25 7.5 25 7,500 SF 75 35 6,500 SF, 60 12,000 SF 80 for a RMF -6 25 and 30 duplex, 35 5,500 per 100 unit for 3+ units 50 10 Of 50% Of 50% of RMF -16 building building building 43.560 150 75 height or height Or height Or � 30' min. 15' Mir. 30' min. All numbers shown are the required minimum amounts except as noted All numbers shown are in feet unless otherwise noted The limitations of the P zoning district are tied to the most restrictive adjacent district -- in this case the CON district is the deciding factor The table and its footnotes show the rezoning to the P zoning district will increase the required setbacks. According to LDC Subsection 2.03.05.A, the purpose and intent of public use district (P) is to: Accommodate only local, state and federally owned or leased and operated government facilities that provide essential public services. The P district is intended to facilitate the coordination of urban services and land uses while minimizing the potential disruption of the uses of nearby properties. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the proposed zoning district. LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1.2 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 12 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -39- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Staff s responses to these criteria are provided in non - italicized font: Rezone Findines• 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. As noted in the GMP Consistency portion of this report, the proposed uses and development standards would generally further the goals and objectives of the FLUE. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern is characterized by a park use to the north, a golf course to the east, Gordon river to the south and a zoo and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida to the west along with residential, office, and an airport uses. The uses proposed in this petition should not create incompatibility issues. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed rezoning would not create an isolated zoning district because, as noted above the parcel is surrounded by a park, a zoo. a golf course and the Conservancy. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries. The location map on page two of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. The proposed zoning change is appropriate because its relationship to the FLUE (Future Land Use Element of the GMP) is positive. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP support the approval of the uses proposed at this location. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezone is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The proposed park is the connection between Freedom Park to the north and the greenway along the Gordon River to the south located in the City of RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 13 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -40- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Naples. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular rraf' including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the project at this time. This project was evaluated for GMP consistency as shown in that section of this report. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The development that the rezoning could allow should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards as part of the local development order process that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Any proposed water management and drainage system will need to be designed to prevent drainage problems on site and be compatible with the adjacent water management systems. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. This development should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas; thus the development proposed, if approved, should not negatively affect light and air permeation into adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area Since the proposed change is deemed to be consistent with the GMP and LDC, staff is of the opinion that property values should not be adversely affected. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will he a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around this property are already partially developed as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 14 of iR Revised 5.17.11 Packet Page -41- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed rezone should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed development complies with the GMP, a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. There is no reason the property could not be used in accordance with existing zoning. Any petition for a change in land use is reviewed for in compliance with the GMP and the LDC with the Board of County Commissioners ultimately ruling what uses and density or intensity is approved or, on the contrary, if the petition is denied. This petitioner is proceeding through the proper channels to gamer that Board ruling. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed development complies with the GMP requirements for the uses proposed. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the zoning district will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDCi and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for anv of the range of potential uses under the proposed I oning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed zoning district would require some site alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 15 of IS Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -42- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities for and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. Based upon the above analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed change to the Public Use (P) Zoning District is not anticipated to have an adverse effect upon the surrounding area if it is limited to the following condition of approval: The land use is limited to parks, recreational services and parking facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION• The EAC heard this petition on May 4, 2011, and voted 5 -0 to deny this petition. However, the EAC could recommend approval subject to the following stipulations: Include /incorporate a filter marsh. Include pervious pathways. 3. Provide a parking analysis to evaluate whether all of the impacts are required in the Zoo node parking lot (which is to be placed within existing Conservation zoning and Gopher Tortoise habitat). For further information, please see Attachment A: "Environmental Advisory Council Staff Report." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM)• The meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on March 2, 2011. Please see Attachment B: "Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis." COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on May 12, 2011. RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 16 of 16 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -43- 7126/2011 Item &A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward petition RZ- PI2009 -25 to the Board of County Commissioners BCC) with a recommendation of approval with the following condition: 1. The land use is limited to parks. recreational services and parking facilities. RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 17 of 18 Revised 5 -17 -11 Packet Page -44- PREPARED BY: NANCY U LAM AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER GROWTH ANAGEMENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAY ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION IAM b- LORAtNZ. Jr. P.E., DIRECTOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION APPROVED BY: NICK CASALAMOVIDA, DEPU ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. ,,DKTE 5 -ib -11 DATE v5, i z-Zof i DATE DATE Tentatively scheduled for the June 28, 2011, Board of County Commissioners Meeting RZ- PL2009 -25, GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Page 18 of 18 Revised 5 -11 -11 Packet Page -45- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4, 2011 Item VI.A. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF MAY 4, 2011 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT Petition No.: PL 2009 -25 Rezone and PL 2011 -677 ST Permit companion item Petition Name: Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone and ST Permit companion item Applicant/Developer: Collier County Public Services Division, Parks and Recreation Department Engineering Consultant: Kimley Horn and Assoc, J.P. Marchand Environmental Consultant: Entrix, Inc., Raymond Loraine II. LOCATION The 123.6 + /- acre subject property is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) and south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886), in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ZONING N - A, C -3 S_ C -3, CON, City of Naples Zoning District: PD E - A. PUD, City of Naples Zoning District PD and C4 W - A, CON, RSF-1, RMF -6, RM17-16, City of Naples Zoning Districts: A Packet Page -46- DESCRIPTION Golden Gate Parkway then Freedom Park, Caribbean Gardens Zoo, office park office buildings, the Conservancy of SW Florida Bear's Paw Golf and Country Club, single- family, multi -family development, airport vacant, undeveloped land, offices, single - Family, Conservancy of SW Florida, Car - ribean Gardens Zoo Page I of 11 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4, 2011 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The request is to Rezone several properties totaling 123.6± acres from Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) a with an ST Overlay, Commercial Intermediate (C -3), and Residential Multi- family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with an ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenwav Park (GRGP'). A companion ST Permit request has been made in conjunction with the rezoning request in order to impact areas within the ST overlay. The main parcel is bordered to the north by Golden Gate Parkway, to the south and west by the Gordon River and to the east by Bear's Paw Golf Course. The Naples Airport borders the southeastern most parcel and the two (2) westernmost parcels are bordered to the west by Goodlette Frank Road and to the east by the Gordon River. The Gordon River is a Class III water body that is listed as impaired by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection due to its low dissolved oxygen concentration. Additionally, the Golden Gate Canal, a major drainage canal that terminates at Naples Bay, enters the Gordon River along the eastern boundary of the largest parcel. The Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) site improvements and related infrastructure for public use are proposed to create water quality systems and passive recreation amenities within an ecological trail corridor. The proposed GRGP project is designed to create a unique passive park along witb a water quality system to mitigate and reduce pollution levels in Gordon River and downstream surface waters that flow into Naples Bay, within the Naples - Collier urban area. Primary components of the GRGP project are depicted on the overall site concept plan (Exhibit 7 of EIS) are expected to include: • Storm water dry detention treatment areas and bio- retention swales • Water control structures • Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian • walkways, pavilions and boardwalks • Fishing platform • Parking, including shared parking facilities • Designated environmental preserve areas • Restroom facilities • Pedestrian bridges • Connection points to access roadways by others • Park maintenance building • Canoe/kayak launch facility at the Gordon River • Gopher Tortoise Preserve • Site landscaping • Best management improvements to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. Page 2 of 11 Packet Page -47- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY A. Future Land Use Element The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area. This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non - residential uses, including parks, recreational facilities, and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Public Use District (P) is intended to accommodate government facilities that provide essential services, including parks and recreational services facilities. Furthermore, the proposed use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) via Policy 5.5, which encourages the planning for expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands that are designated for urban intensity uses. The P District is also intended for additional uses such as administrative services facilities, not for profit child care facilities, collections and transfer sites for resource recovery, communication towers, educational facilities, educational plants, essential public service facilities, fairgrounds, libraries, museums, parking facilities, safety services facilities, and other comparable uses. B. Conservation & Coastal Management Element Objective 2.2 All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet applicable Federal, State, or local water quality standards. Policy 22.2 In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of storm water run -off, storm water systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt should be made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality offresh water to the estuarine system_ Non - structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged The Gordon River Greenway Park design will meet all federal, State, and local water quality design standards; issuance of the ERP from the SFVAO will confirm this assertion. In addition, as required by the Florida Communities Trust grant, water quality will be improved within the currently impaired Gordon River by the onsite treatment of offsite runoff from Golden Gate Parkway as discussed in Subsection f.i. (EIS, p. 15). The storm water runoff will be conveyed through a stone water treatment unit to separate solids, grease and oils. The storm water will then be conveyed through a pipe and released into a spreader swale enhancing the timing, quantity and quality of the storm water to the estuarine system. Objective 6.1 The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measureable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for the portion of the Page 3 of 11 Packet Page -48- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land use Map (FL UM) as Rural Lands Stewardship Overlay. Policy 6.1.1 For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District, Rural- Industrial District and Rural - Settlement Area District as designated on the FL UM native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (A CSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this policy shall appiv to all non - agricultural development except for single-family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. The Gordon River Greenway Park contains approximately 112. S acres of native habitat of which some 103.3 acres (approximately 91.6 %) will not be impacted and 222 acres (19.7 %) will be placed in a Preserve. The preservation area exceeds the 15% native habitat requirement (16.92 acres) and includes most of the upland gopher tortoise habitat within the project. Policv 61.4 Prohibited invasive exotic vegetation shall be removed from all new developments. Nuisance and exotic species of plants, particularly Brazilian pepper, Melaleuca, Australian pine, and Downy rose myrtle are required to be removed from the entire site during final site inspections. Policy 61.5 The County shall require native vegetation to be incorporated into landscape designs in order to promote the preservation of native plant communities and to encourage water conservation. The Gordon River Greenway Park has been designed to showcase the native vegetation of Collier Counn. Native vegetation will be incorporated into supplemental landscape designs. Objective 6.2 The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measureable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element. The design of the Gordon River Greenway Park meets or exceeds all the applicable Policies within this Objective. Approximately 91.6% of the native wetland and upland habitats onsite will not be developed. In addition, one of the major components of the project will include environmental education. Objective 7.1 The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to ident fy species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Page 4 of 11 Packet Page -49- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A- 27.003, 68A - 27.004, and 68A- 27.005, FAC and those species designated by various - federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17. The only listed animal species observed onsite by the environmental consultant was the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). The consultant identified 316 burrows. County staff worked with the applicant to develop a site plan to minimize impacts to the gopher tortoise and to maximize preservation of the existing gopher tortoise habitat. Permitting for gopher tortoise relocation adjacent to the zoo property is required and proposed to be done prior to any site work. The removal and maintenance of nuisance and exotic plant species, specifically downy rose myrtle, will improve the habitat of this species. Objective 10.1 Priorities for shoreline land use shall be given to water dependent uses over water related land uses and shall be based on type of water-dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR- SP- 93 -01) May 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number ofwet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan's marina siting criteria. In accordance with Policies 10.0.0 and 10.1.4, the proposed canoe/kayak launch will be public, prohibit motorized boats, and will impact only 0.21 acres of disturbed mixed forested wetlands. Objective 10.2 The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10.2.3 and 10.2.4. Objective 12.2 The County shall ensure that publicly, funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re- building cost from the effects front hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not Iimited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; (Criterion met. The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10.23 and 10.2.4. Additionally, the applicant sustains that the proposed habitable structures will be built at a minimum finished floor elevation of 7 feet, which is the minimum elevation required for the subject property by the current FEMA Flood Zone Base Flood Elevation (AE7) map.) b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; (Criterion met. The proposed project site retains existing wetlands and proposes opens space that will serve as a wildfire protective zone. In this regard, these Page 5 of 11 Packet Page -50- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4, 2011 strategies are consistent with those included in the "Wildfire Mitigation In Florida Land Use Planning Strategies and Best Management Practices" published by the Florida Department of Community Affairs., ) c. installation of on -site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; (Criterion not applicable. The applicant sustains that emergency power generators are not necessary for the proposed park structures. Staff is of the opinion that this criterion is not applicable because the proposed structures will not serve as public emergency shelters.) d. beach and dune restoration, re- nourishment, or emergence protective actions to minimize the loss ofstructures, from future events: (Criterion met. The applicant sustains that this criterion is not applicable. However, staff is of the opinion that "protective actions to minimise the loss of structures from future events" is a criterion that must be addressed. In this regard, the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code include requirements that address this criterion.' ) e. emergency road repairs: (Criterion met. The applicant notes that the proposed project minimizes the amount of road construction through the use of shared access points and parking areas.) f repair andior replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls, etc. (Criterion met. The applicant states that publicly owned facilities will be designed to industry and County standards to minimize maintenance and repair needs.) Vl. MAJOR ISSUES A. Stormwater Management Storm water management for the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) will consist of two (2) separate systems. Both the Zoo Parking Node and the Northeast Parking Node use typical catch basins and pipe to collect runoff from the parking areas and convey it to dry, detention pre - treatment areas before discharging through control structures with bubble -up outfalls into wetlands. The receiving body for the outfalls is the Gordon River. The Northeast Parking Node also proposes to provide storm water discharge conveyance for a portion of Golden Gate Parkway after passing the road runoff through a commercially distributed storm water treatment chamber. Storm water will not be directed into the Upland Preserve. Storm water management concerns will be reviewed at time of Site Development Plan submittal and will be required to meet the LDC. This project will be permitted by South Florida Water Management District. B. Environmental 1. Site Description and Project Description: Environmental Requirements The main parcel contains wetlands along the Gordon River Greenway corridor and uplands with Gopher Tortoise in the central eastern portion of the properly. The western half Zoo Parking node has been highly impacted as it has been part of the Zoo parking area See the Listed Page 6 of I l Packet Page -51- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 Species Map (Exhibit 15 of EIS) for a comprehensive look at the wetlands, uplands, and listed species on the property. The site will be enhanced through water quality improvements, wetland enhancement, nuisance/exotic species removal, and proper land management activities. See Exhibit 8 of the EIS for impacts to the entire site. 2. Wetlands The wetland limits were verified by the SFWMD on February 6, 2009 (Exhibits 11 and 12 of EIS). The wetlands within the project boundaries total 80.1 acres. Permanent wetland impacts totaling 236 acres include the following: 2.15 acres expected for the construction of the North Park Node. The bioswale will receive untreated storm water runoff from Golden Gate Parkway and treat the nmoff to improve water quality in the Gordon River. See Exhibit 13 of EIS for Wetland Impacts map. The design of the project has been balanced between minimization of wetland impacts and the simultaneous need to protect listed species, e.g., gopher tortoise, habitat. The North Park Node has been sited in wetlands of poor quality as close to Golden Gate Parkway as possible to minimize access - associated impacts and secondary impacts to Wetland 2. According to the EIS, all boardwalk construction will minimize construction related impacts to the extent practicable and shading impacts through construction of boardwalks 5 feet above surface elevations to allow light penetration underneath. 3. Preservation Requirements The Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.05.07.13 requires designation of at least 15% of the native vegetation onsite as Preserve. For the subject project, the Preserve requirement is 16.92 acres (112.8 acres x 0.15). The Overall Project Site Concept Plan (Exhibit 7 of EIS) provides a designated Preserve of 22.2 acres. The onsite preserve prioritization hierarchy in the LDC and GNP requires that areas known to be utilized by listed species be a high priority for preservation. Therefore, gopher tortoise habitat was a priority for preservation in development of the site plan and nearly the entire occupied upland gopher tortoise habitat was included in the designated Preserve (Exhibit 9 of EIS). 4. Listed Species Approximately 316 gopher tortoise burrows were observed onsite by the environmental consultant. The project has minimized impacts to gopher tortoise habitat by locating the East Node parking in Wetland 2 adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. Permitting for the relocation of gopher tortoises on the parcel adjacent to the zoo is required prior to site work. Potential effects on gopher tortoises during nature trail construction will be evaluated through consultation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and permitted as required. In addition, the construction and visitor interaction will be addressed in the Preserve Management Plan required with the Site Development Plan. The bridges and canoe/kayak launch have been located as far away from the Yellow - crowned Night Heron rookery as possible. Page 7 of 11 Packet Page -52- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 VII. EXISTING ZONING AND OVERLAYS A. Conservation (CON) Zoning As stated in section 2.03.09.B. of the Land Development Code (LDC), the purpose and intent of the Conservation District (CON) district is "to conserve, protect and maintain vital natural resource lands within unincorporated Collier County that are owned primarily by the public. All native habitats possess ecological and physical characteristics that justify attempts to maintain these important natural resources. Barrier islands, coastal bays, wetlands, and habitat for listed species deserve particular attention because of their ecological value and their sensitivity to perturbation. All proposals for development in the CON district must be subject to rigorous review to ensure that the impacts of the development do not destroy or unacceptably degrade the inherent functional values. The CON District includes such public lands as Everglades National Park, Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, portions of the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Collier - Seminole State Park, Rookery Bay National Estuarine Sanctuary Research Reserve, Delnor- Wiggins State Park, and the National Audubon's Corkscrew- Swamp Sanctuary (privately owned), and C.R.E. W. It is the intent of the CON District to require review of all development proposed within the CON District to ensure that the inherent value of the County's natural resources is not destroyed or unacceptably altered. The CON District corresponds to and implements the conservation land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. To provide a brief history of the property, the site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C -3 (Commercial Intermediate), A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County, created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property- were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 52 -2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. The applicant has requested for the CON zoning to be rezoned to P (Public Use) designation for use as a public park. The gopher tortoise in this area will be required to be relocated prior to impacts in accordance with the FFWCC regulations. B. Special Treatment (ST) Zoning Overlav — COMPANION ITEM PL 2011 -677 The project has a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay district designation on approximately 63.47 acres of the overall 123.6 acre project site. As a companion to the subject rezone request, an ST permit application is being reviewed as part of the public hearing process. Page 8 of 11 Packet Page -53- 7/2612011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 As stated in section 2.03.07.D. of the Land Development Code (LDC), the Special Treatment (ST) overlay district classification will be used for those lands of environmental sensitivity and historical and archaeological significance where the essential ecological or cultural value of the land is not adequately protected under the basic zoning district regulations established by Code or by ordinance. All land within the ST overlay district shall be designated as environmentally sensitive. Section 2.03.07.D. of the Land Development Code states the purpose and intent of the ST overlay district, and reads as follows: "Within the County there are certain areas, which because of their unique assemblages of flora andior fauna, their aesthetic appeal, historical or archaeological significance, rarity in the County, or their contribution to their own and adjacent ecosystems, make them worthy of special regulations. Such regulations are directed toward the conservation, protection, and preservation of ecological and recreational values for the greatest benefit to the people of the County. Such areas include, but are not necessarily limited to, mangrove and freshwater swamps, barrier islands, hardwood hammocks, xeric scrubs, coastal beaches, estuaries, cypress domes, natural drainage ways, aquifer recharge areas, and lands and structures of historical and archaeological significance. The purpose of the "ST" district is to assure the preservation and maintenance of these environmental and cultural resources and to encourage the preservation of the intricate ecological relationships within the systems, and at the same time, permit those types of development which will hold changes to levels determined acceptable by the BCC after public hearing." Including temporary impacts, the total proposed altered area within the ST overlay district is 5.68 acres (9 %), with 1.81 acres of that being proposed impervious area- Temporary impacts include a two feet wide temporary construction impact area along both outside edges of the boardwalk, a total 12 feet of temporary construction impact along the asphalt trails, and potential excavation for utility piping/tie -in. Within the ST overlay area, the following are proposed: • The Northeast Development Node with its associated restroon- maintenance storage building, pavilion, parking, stormwater treatment areas, landscaping_ and ancillary facilities. • Passive park amenities such as recreational multipurpose pedestrian/bicycle trails, boardwalks, associated shade structures, and lighting. • Fishing platform. • A water quality treatment facility to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. • Utility piping for water, sewer, and stormwater. • Pedestrian bridge. • Exotic plant removal. The design of the project has minimized wetland impacts by locating the parking area within wetlands of poor quality as close to Golden Gate Parkway as possible - discussion Page 9 of 11 Packet Page -54- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 above (B2. Wetlands). The overall proposed GRGP project includes over 100 acres of undeveloped upland and wetland habitats, including a 22.2 acre preservation area. As a result of the proposed project, approximately 91 % of the ST overlay area will remain unaltered except for the removal of exotic plants. Therefore, staff is in agreement with the applicant in stating that "the project will achieve the conservation goals envisioned with the original designation of a general conservation ST Overlay in this area." Final action on the site alteration plan requested with the Special Treatment Permit lies with the Board of County Commissioners. VII. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for 1) Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone PL 2009 -25 and 2) Special Treatment Permit PL 2011 -677 revised on April 15, 2011. VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of 1) Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone PL 2009-25 and 2) Special Treatment Permit PL 2011 -677. Page 10 of 11 Packet Page -55- Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 PREPARED BY: SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NANCY GM PRINCIPAL: LAND SERVICES DEPARTMENT T .CK MCKENNA, P.E. ENGINEERING REVIEW MANAGER COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: GERALD KURTZ, P.E. MANAGER OF STORMWATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OF COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: NICK CAS GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR Packet Page -56- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. DATE DATE / ' ee" /// DATE 4 t DATE b4.Is -��r DATE g -20-11 DATE Page 11 of 11 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK IRHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SYNOPSIS Wednesday, March 2, 2011 6:00 p.m. Freedom Park The Neighborhood Information Meeting for the Gordon River Greenway Park was held on March 2, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. at Freedom Park in Naples, Florida. An attendance sheet listing attendees of the meeting is attached. Including staff members there were 53 attendees at the meeting. Staff members participating in the presentation or the question and answer period included Barry Williams and Tonv Roberto of the Parks Department and Nancy Gundloch with the Planning Department Project consultants participating in the presentation were J.P. Marchand from Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. and Allison Megrath from Land Planning Solutions, Alexandra Sulecki with Conservation Collier and Ellie Krier, representing the Southwest Florida Preservation Land Trust, also assisted with responding to questions. An auto tape was made of the entire meeting and provided to the County Planning Department. Attached is the agenda for the meeting. Handouts were provided to the attendees at the start of the meeting. Barry Williams opened the meeting by providing introductions of staff members at the meeting and generally describing the purpose of the meeting. J.P. Marchand then provided a brief description of the project location and the requested rezoning. He reviewed the existing conditions at the project area, existing land uses, general conditions of the land, and the adjacent properties. J.P. then provided a brief description of the proposed park project, the two park facilities nodes, the restrooms, maintenance building, and pavilions to he provided at the parking nodes, and the shared parking with the Conservancy and the Zoo. He further described the canoe/kavak launch area, the paths throughout the project including boardwalks and asphalt surface paths, the two bridges that are proposed in the project, and the stormwater management facilities to be provided to treat runoff from Golden Gate Parkway. The meeting then opened up for questions and answers. There were some questions about the native habitat and native species on the project. J.P. pointed out that the only listed native species on the project was the gopher tortoise. The impact to the gopher tortoises would be minimized, and a 22 acre preserve is proposed. J.P. further pointed out that most of the project area will remain undisturbed and will be improved through the removal of exotic plant species. There were questions regarding the bridges and what was proposed. It was pointed out the bridge across the Golden Gate Canal was planned to be placed at 11 feet above mean high water which is approximately a foot higher than the downstream bridge at U.S. 41 and that the current proposal was to include two piers within the Golden Gate Canal for that bridge. Comments relative to the rowing club were made requesting that no piles be installed in the river as a safety concern for rowers. The concern was noted. The bridge at the canoe/kayak launch was then described as being proposed as 5 to 6 feet above mean high water and completely spanning the Gordon River at that location. There were some questions relative to kayaking and kayak access and whether or not it might possible to add a mulch trail from the northeast parking node and restroom to the Gordon River for the use of kayakers that happen to kayak up to that point. There were comments made relative to the large amount of foliage along the river banks, and it was requested that there be no trimming of plants along the river edge. The response was made that there were no plans for trimming the mangroves along the water's edge. Some impact would be necessary at limited points such as at the bridge crossings. Attachment B Packet Page -57- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. There were also questions regarding the proposed access driveway and the existing right of way easement along the eastern edge of the project west of the Bear's Paw Country Club. It was pointed out that there is an easement along the eastern property line between this project and the Bear's Paw Country Club and that easement is to serve private property to the south. The easement requires construction of an access driveway and discusses a fence along the eastern edge of that easement, but at this point there are no plans by the private developer to build that access. Therefore, the County was undertaking building the first 300' or so of that driveway just to provide access to the northeast park node. The County will comply with all the applicable buffer requirements during the construction of that driveway and during the construction of the park project as well. There were some comments about homeowners' associations and other groups in the immediate area being able to participate in the stakeholders meetings. It was commented that opportunities for more participation by the homeowners' associations and other groups would be explored and more outreach to neighbors would continue. A general description of the rezoning process was provided. It was pointed out that a Planning Commission and a Board of County Commissioner public hearing would be required for the rezoning of this property. Those two public hearings have not been scheduled, but anyone that received notice for this meeting would also receive a notice for those public bearings. There was some discussion regarding of the purpose of the project and the general benefits that would incur to the public, including general recreation benefits and preservation of the property. It was pointed out that an opportunity for fishing may be added to the project and that lighting would be included along the main spine of the paths. Security, safety and maintenance were discussed. It was pointed out that maintenance crews would be working in the park and no trash cans would be proposed in most of the park to encourage people clean up after themselves as has successfully been done at Freedom Park. There were some questions as to the hours of operation, and while those have not been set, it was pointed out that the park may be closed in the evenings possibly with automatic gates and that the lighting included along the paths would be set at a low lighting level. There was discussion as to the homeless folks that have been living in the general area. The establishment of the park was anticipated to eliminate some of that. There were comments about removing debris in the Golden Gate Canal to the east of the proposed park, but not part of the proposed project itself. There was some discussion about the budget for the proposed project and the fund sources. It was pointed out that the overall project budget including acquisition was approximately $9,900,000 and the funding source was the Florida Community Trust. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. After the meeting was adjourned and most attendees were gone, a request was made to provide habitat for bats under the two bridges. This will be considered. Packet Page -58- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET "A 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 STANDA#tD REZONE APPUCATION PETITION NO (AR) PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER I To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ASSIGNED PLANNER Above to be completed by staff NAME OF APPLICANT(S) MARLA RAMSEY, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESS PARKS AND RECREATION, 15000 LIVINGSTON ROAD CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34109 TELEPHONE # 239 - 252 -8468 CELL # N/A FAX # 239 - 252 -2525 E -MAIL ADDRESS: MARLARAMSEY @COLLIERGOV.NET NAME OF AGENT J.P. MARCHAND, P.E. ADDRESS 2601 CATTLEMEN ROAD, SUITE 200 CITY SARASOTA STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34232 TELEPHONE # 941 - 379 -7600 CELL # FAX # 941 - 379-4352 E -MAIL ADDRESS: JP.MARCHAND @KIMLEY- HORN.COM BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Packet Page -59- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets If necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at h II a vne"Index asp x ?pace =774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: BEARS'S PAW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION MAILING ADDRESS 411 WILDWOOD LANE CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34105 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: BEAR'S PAW COUNTRY CLUB MAILING ADDRESS 2500 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34105 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: LAKE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. MAILING ADDRESS 971 11TH ST. NORTH CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34102 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: RIVER REACH SINGLE FAMILY ASSOCIATION, INC. MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 10481 CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34101 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: RIVER REACH RENTAL APARTMENTS MAILING ADDRESS 2000 RIVER REACH DRIVE CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34104 Packet Page -60- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. s i o , .c,.,.., ;, a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address j ova of Ownership (Land Parcel 1) South Portion of Folio No. 61940200006 for Zoo Park Development Node. Owner: Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, No les, FI. 341 12-396 9 700% (Land Parcel 2) East of Gordon River and East Park Development Node. Folio No. 61 947800001. Owner: Collier County,3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Fi. 341 12 -3969 100% (Land Parcel 3) Folio No. 002681 60009. Owner: Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Fl, 341 12-3969 100% I i b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. C. Name and Not If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Packet Page -61- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address %a Ownershi Not Applicable e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address % of Ownership Not Applicable - - -� I Date of Contract: Not Applicable f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name g. Date subject property, acquired ® leased ❑ Land 1 - Latest Acquisition 12/05; Land 2- Latest Acquisition 12/05; Land 3 -Land 4- Latest Acquisition 4/06 Term of lease Not Applicable (N /A) yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: N/A and date option terminates: N /A, or anticipated closing date N/A In. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Packet Page -62- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Cotner County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Legal Description of Subject Property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the lost six months, maximum 1 ` to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section /Township /Range 27 & 34 / T 39 5 / R 25 Eat Lot: 5ee Item #12 in 13 July 2009 Latter Block: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Subdivision: Seg Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Plat Book See Item #21 in September 2010 Letter Page #: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Property I.D. #: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Metes & Bounds Description: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Size of property 123,6 Address /general location of subiect property See Item #12 in April 2010 Letter e�. Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section /Township /Range 2 IAV25 Subdivision: 506200 Lot: 3.4.5 Block: N/A Plat Book: 2 Page # 2 Property I.D. #: 41940200006 Metes & Bounds Description: Refer to Attachment 4 - Deeds and Leaals - for full description Packet Page -63- Zoning Land Use N A, C -3 Vacant, Golden Gate Parkway, Zoo Conservancy of SW Florida and Single 5 CON, A, and City of Naples PO I Family Residential, Vacant Bear Paw Golf Course; Vacant Ag Land; A, PUD and City of Naples PD and Residential River Reach; City of E C4 Naples Air ort Goodlette -Frank Road, Zoo, Vacant, A, CON, RSF-4, RMF -16, and City Conservancy of SW Florida, and SF W of Naples PD and PS and MF Residential Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section /Township /Range 2 IAV25 Subdivision: 506200 Lot: 3.4.5 Block: N/A Plat Book: 2 Page # 2 Property I.D. #: 41940200006 Metes & Bounds Description: Refer to Attachment 4 - Deeds and Leaals - for full description Packet Page -63- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Co& County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from the A C -3 RMF -6(3) and CON zoning district(s) to the P zoning district(s). An ST permit application Is also being submitted as a companion item to this Rezoning Application. Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped (Vacant )Public Land Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Public Park (Gordon River Greenwav Park) EVALUATION CRITERIA - - Pursuant to Section 10.03.05.1-1. of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. Standard Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.03 05 H ) 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management pion. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Revised May 2010 Packet Page -64- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Co er�w COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net 72. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 73. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 75. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 706, art. 11], as amended. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that Hearing? Applicant's Aaent is not aware of any public hearing held on this property within the Past Year. SEE ATTACHMENT 1 FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA RESPONSES (1 -18 above and Additional Submittal Requirements (a -i below). Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No If so, please provide copies. Additional Submittal requirements: In addition to this completed application, the following shall be submitted in order for your application to be deemed sufficient, unless otherwise waived during the pre - application meeting. a. A copy of the pre - application meeting notes; b. If this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide fifteen (15) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan (16 copies if for affordable housing) [and one reduced 81h" x 11" copy of site plan), drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting the following [Additional copies of the plan may be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisory boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board (EAC), or CCPC]; Revised May 2010 Packet Page -6S- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION Colt County 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net • all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof, • provisions for existing and /or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site), • all existing and /or proposed parking and loading areas [include matrix indicating required and provided parking and loading, including required parking for the disabled], • required yards, open space and preserve areas, • proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the site), • proposed and /or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County, c. An architectural rendering of any proposed structures. d. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 10.02.02. of the Land Development Code (LDC) , or a request for waiver if appropriate. e. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and /or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionally, a calculation of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation and location(s) of the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section 3.05.07.11.1.). f. Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches); g. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre - application meeting. For TIS Guidelines and Procedures, please refer to the following link: btti)• /iwww.colliergov.net/index.asT)x?page=566 . For additional questions, contact John Podczerwinky, 239 - 252 -8192 In. A historical and archeological survey or waiver application if property is located within an area of historical or archaeological probability (as identified at pre - application meeting); i. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the pre - application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits. School Concurrence - If the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County at 239.377 -0267 to discuss school concurrency requirements. Section 10.03.05.6.3. of the Land Development Code requires an applicant to remove their public hearing advertising sign (s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign (s) immediately. Revised May 2010 Packet Page -66- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park Proiect Rezone Application Submittal EVALUATION CRITERIA STANDARD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.03.05.H) ATTACHMENT 1 Project No. 2008.4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -t. Gordon River Greenw y Park Packet Page -67- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park Project Rezone Application Submittal ATTACHMENT 1 - EVALUATION CRITERIA STANDARD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.03.05.H) 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan. RESPONSE: Yes. The Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) will provide acreage or outdoor recreational facilities necessary to maintain or improve adopted levels of service standards established in the Collier County comprehensive plan for recreation. Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 1.1.1 has the following level of service standards for facilities and land owned by the County or available to the general public: A. 1.2882 acres of community park land /1000 population B. 2.9412 acres of regional park land /1000 population C. Recreation facilities, which have a value (as (X) defined) of at least $179.00 per capita of population. The GRGP project site has added approximately 79.94 acres of regional park land to the County's inventory, thereby serving an additional 27,000 in population. Collier County Recreation and Open Space Element Objective 1.3 directs the County to continue to ensure that all public water bodies are accessible to the general public. Collier County Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 1.1.6 directs the County to establish and implement a program with appropriate criteria to designate or acquire open space areas and natural reservations. Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 3.1.1 directs the County to acquire land to meet the needs of the Community and Regional Park Plan, including sufficient land to allow for a portion of these sites to remain in passive open space. Collier County Recreation and Open Space Element Policy 3.1.6 directs the County to encourage the development of pedestrian pathways and bike lanes from the surrounding residential communities to park sites. Transportation Element Objective 4 directs the County to provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorized and non - motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Transportation Element Policy 4.3 further directs the County to provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by making the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective 10.2 directs the County to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund Project No. 2008- 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 Jury 2009 _7. Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -68- 7/26/2011 Item B.A. its acquisition. Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 71 2(2)(a)1 c directs the County to incorporate proper management techniques for protecting listed species and their habitat and specifically mentions Gopher Tortoise populations and habitat. conservation ano Coastal Management Element Policy 7.1.20(b) requires that priority be given to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows. 2. The existing land use program. RESPONSE: There is no existing land use program for the GRGP site as the entire property is undeveloped (vacant). 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. RESPONSE: To the Applicant's Agent best knowledge and understanding, there are no plans by Collier County to create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts as the entire GRGP property (currently zoned A) is proposed herein to be rezoned to PU with substantial acreage for designated environmental preserve areas. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. RESPONSE: The existing agricultural zoned district boundaries are not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions as the entire GRGP property is presently undeveloped (vacant) and has not been utilized for agricultural purposes. However, the existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing adjacent and nearby land uses and development conditions. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. RESPONSE: See responses to Item 1 above. Collier County has purchased all lands for the GRGP project pursuant to 'Conservation Collier' policy authorizations and grant funding appropriations issued by the Florida Communities Trust (Florida Forever Program). It is also noted that the Collier County Future Land Use Map does not include the GRGP lands in the Agricultural/Rural designation to complement the existing A zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. RESPONSE: No, the proposed site development improvements for the GRGP will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood bur rather shall provide much needed passive park and recreational facilities consistent with Collier County's growth management plan. The proposed zoning change is similar and complementary to park land uses designated for the recently constructed Freedom Park project located immediately north of the proposed GRGP property. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak Project No. 2008- 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -2- Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -69- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. RESPONSE: As set forth in the accompanying Traffic Impact Statement prepared for the GRGP project, the proposed zoning change for passive park, surface water management and environmental preserve land uses will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion. The GRGP project will not create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses (Freedom Park, County Zoo and Bear's Paw Golf Course) because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development or otherwise affect public safety. Additionally, it is noted that shared parking is planned to become available at the Collier County Zoo property. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. RESPONSE: No, the proposed GRGP project is not expected to create drainage problems as all site development designs will include design provisions for stormwater management facilities and drainage infrastructure in accordance with minimum requirements set forth by the Collier County Land Development code and regulations and Environmental Resource Permit criteria set forth by the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent area. RESPONSE: No, the proposed GRGP project will not seriously reduce existing light and air attributes to adjacent areas as there are no planned multistory buildings. Moreover, given the extensive setbacks from the three planned park development nodes to existing land developments, the three planned pedestrian bridges are not expected to create a diminished enjoyment of air space and vistas by residential property owners. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. RESPONSE: No, the proposed zoning change form Agriculture to Public Use (park improvements) is not expected to seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. The GRGP will include substantial environmental preserves will may actually enhance the value of property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. RESPONSE: No, the proposed GRGP zoning change from Agriculture to Public Use (park improvements) is not expected to diminish the rights of adjacent property owners to develop property consistent with applicable local, state and federal regulations. The GRGP project is being favorably coordinated with several land development projects, including the County Zoo master development adjacent to Goodlette -Fank Road, the Bridges at Gordon River Continuing Care Retirement Community to the north and the planned residential community east of the East Development Node (known as the Tiger's Paw development). 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -3_ Gordon RiverGreenmy Park Packet Page -70- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. RESPONSE: No, the proposed GRGP zoning change from Agriculture to Public Use (park improvements) is not expected to constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner since Collier County will review and approve all proposed land development projects in the vicinity in accordance the Land development Cue and other governing regulations. Developer contribution agreements currently being processed by Collier County presumably will not grant any special privileges to an individual property owner. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. RESPONSE: The planned GRGP project is not wholly consistent with the County's permissible land uses for the existing agriculture zoning district. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. RESPONSE: No, the proposed GRGP project will be not be out of scale with the recreational needs of the community as there are no planned multistory buildings and the three planned pedestrian bridges will not be constructed at elevations obtrusive to continued public enjoyment of air space and vistas. The GRGP project is complementary to the adjacent County Zoo land use and the recently completed Freedom Park. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. RESPONSE: It is not impossible to locate other adequate sites in the County to develop parks and recreational facilities for the public, but such assessments have already been undertaken by 'Conservation Collier' and County staff with the conclusion that the GRGP site is in the best interest and welfare of the public. All land parcels comprising the GRGP project have been previously acquired by Collier County. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential use under the proposed zoning classification. RESPONSE: See accompanying Environmental Impact Statement and the preliminary 30% design status plans which collectively provide extensive information on the existing physical characteristics of the property. The GRGP project is located within environmentally sensitive lands which will be subject to permit reviews and approvals by various local, state and federal regulatory agencies. The degree of site alteration activities is very minor in terms of land clearing areas and development acreages as compared to the overall 80 +- acre park (ref. 30% design status plans). 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Code ch. 106, and 11), as amended. RESPONSE: There will be no adverse impact or minimal impact to existing and future availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan. Utilities facilities are in place by the City of Naples and the existing roadway network is sufficient to convey future trips to Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -4- Gordon River Greenmy Park Packet Page -71- 7/26/2011 Item B.A. be generated by the GRGP project. Reference attached or accompanying Traffic Impact Statement and Utility Provisions Statement. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. RESPONSE: Site improvements and attendant infrastructure for public use are proposed for the GRGP site to create water quality systems and passive recreation amenities within an ecological trail corridor. The proposed park project is planned to enhance public health, safety and welfare benefits to residents and visitors in consideration of the following positive attributes: c Stormwater ponds and conveyance /spreader swales • Water control structures • Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian walkways, pavilions and boardwalks (ADA compliant) • Parking facilities (ADA compliant) • Designated environmental preserve areas • Restroom facilities (ADA compliant) • Pedestrian bridges (ADA compliant) • Connection points to access roadways by others • Park maintenance building • Canoe/kayak launch facility at the Gordon River (ADA compliant) • Gopher Tortoise Preserve • Site landscaping • Best management improvements to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions however many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners, association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. RESPONSE: Not applicable. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that Hearing? RESPONSE: Applicant's Agent is not aware of any public hearing held on this property within the past year regarding land use petitions. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes X No. Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 - MS. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -5- Gordon River Greemvay Park Packet Page -72- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. If so, please provide copies. RESPONSE: Not Applicable Additional Submittal reauirements• In addition to this completed application, the following shall be submitted in order for your application to be deemed sufficient, unless otherwise waived during the pre - application meeting. a. A copy of the pre - application meeting notes. RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 2 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). b. If this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide fifteen (15) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan (16 copies if for affordable housing) (and one reduced 8 1/2" x 11" copy of site plan), drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting the following (Additional copies of the plan may be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisory such as the Environmental Advisory Board (EAB), or (CCPC). RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 17 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009), Twenty (20) sets of 24'x36" 30% design status site plans are provided. Additionally, one (1) set of reduced 8 1/2" x 11" 30% design status site plans are provided attached to this Rezone Application. • All existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof. RESPONSE: See enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans. • Provisions for existing and /or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site). RESPONSE: See enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans. • All existing and /or proposed parking and loading areas (include matrix indicating required and provided parking and loading including required parking for the disabled. RESPONSE: See enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans. • Required yards, open space and preserve areas. RESPONSE: See enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans. • Proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the site). RESPONSE: See enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans and Item # 11 (Utility Provisions Statement) in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). • Proposed and /or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County. Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -6- Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -73- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. RESPONSE: Existing vegetation and ground cover is shown and descried in the enclosed Environmental Impact Statement (Item # 8) and the enclosed (Item # 17) 30% design status site plans. Also, see the 30% design status site plans (sheet C3.0) for buffers. Landscape designs will be included in the final design efforts for the project. County staff is not requiring submittal of proposed landscape and irrigation design plans for this Rezone Application — See Item # 23 Email dated 5/4/09 enclosed as part of the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). c. An architectural rendering of any proposed structures. RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 18 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). d. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 10.02.02. of the Land Development Code (LDC), or a request for waiver if appropriate. RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 8 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). e. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and /or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionally, a calculation of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation and location(s) of the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section 3.05.07.8.1.). RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 15 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). f. Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches). RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 11 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). g. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre - application meeting. RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 13 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). In. A historical and archeological survey or waiver application if property is located within an area of historical or archeological probability (as identified at pre - application meeting). RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 10 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). i. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during thee pre - application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits. RESPONSE: See enclosed Items # 1 -24 in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009) - all requirements established at the pre - application meeting. Project No. 2008. 4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -7. Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -74- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING LDC Section 10.03.05. F Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission. Written notice of the meeting shall be sent 15 days prior to the Neighborhood Information Meeting to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.F.2. Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified. A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the Zoning Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled date of the NIM. The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to accommodate expected attendance. The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and legible site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one - fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM. The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the NIM and shall serve as the facilitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject property. The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the Zoning Department. As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning Department. These written commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval. In cases where the applicant's petition activity extends beyond one year from the date that the last Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held, an additional NIM will be conducted with adherence to all notification and advertising required for the initial meeting. Packet Page -75- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST NAME OF APPLICANT: MARLA RAMSEY, COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR 2. MAILING ADDRESS: PARKS AND RECREATION, 15000 LIVINGSTON ROAD CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34109 3. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): ADDRESS NOT YET ASSIGNED 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section: 27 & 34 Township: T 49 S Range: R 25 E Lot: See Item #12 in — September 2010 Letter Block: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Subdivision: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Plat Book See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Page #: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Property I.D. #: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter Metes & Bounds Description: See Item #12 in September 2010 Letter 5. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system) a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME d. _ PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ❑ (GPD capacity) e. SEPTIC SYSTEM ❑ 6. TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED: a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME _ d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) ❑ 7. TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: See Attachment 2. B. PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: A. WATER -PEAK See Attachment 2. AVERAGE DAILY See Attachment 2. B. SEWER -PEAK See Attachment 2. AVERAGE DAILY See Attachment 2. 9. IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED: Not Applicable. Water Services to be Provided by the City of Naples. Packet Page -76- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 10. NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of effluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. 11. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. 12. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre - application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Udli I" Provision Statemw( RIM 10/77197 Packet Page -77- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. ATTACHMENT 2 Project No. 2008-4004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -7- Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -78- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County Gordon River Greenwav Park Project Rezone Application Submittal ATTACHMENT 2 - STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST Continued from Rezone Application ... ............................... 7. Total Population to be Served: RESPONSE: The total County population approximates 317,788. The GRGP project site will add approximately 79.94 acres of regional park land to the County's inventory, thereby serving an additional 27,000 in population. Pursuant to user demand information provided by County staff, parking facilities will provide a total of 420 parking spaces as follows (exclusive of planned shared parking at the County Zoo facility): o Zoo Development Node: Total parking spaces - 327 (including 5 handicap parking spaces and 7 bus parking spaces). c Kayak Development Node: Total parking spaces = 43 (including 5 handicap parking spaces and 3 Recreational Vehicle parking spaces). o East Development Node: Total parking spaces = 50 (including 2 handicap parking spaces). 8. Peak and Average Daily Demands: • WATER: Preliminary for Kayak Development Node: 22.14 GPM (Peak) and 14.76 GPM (Average Daily) • WATER: Preliminary for Zoo and East Development Nodes: 29.63 GPM (Peak) and 19.60 GPM (Average Daily) • SEWER: Preliminary for Zoo Development Node: 6.90 GPM (Peak) and 1.40 GPM (Average Daily) • SEWER: Preliminary for Kayak Development Node: 5.60 GPM (Peak) and 1.10 GPM (Average Daily) • SEWER: Preliminary for East Development Node: 1.40 GPM (Peak) and 0.30 GPM (Average Daily) The toregoing Peak and Average Daily Demands are preliminary and subject to change as the final utility engineering designs and utility modeling tasks are completed. 10. NARRATIVE STATEMENT: ... ............ regarding sewage treatment process to be used. RESPONSE: There is no on -site sewage treatment facility or process proposed for the Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) Project. No on -site percolation ponds are proposed. All sanitary sewage generated at the GRGP site shall be conveyed by pipeline utilities to City of Naples sanitary sewers /force mains along Goodlette -Frank Road and treated at the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant. 11. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: Project No. 20084004.00 - Ms. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -1- Gordon River Greenmy Park Packet Page -79- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. RESPONSE: The GRGP project includes public water and sanitary sewer connections onto the City of Naples utility system located within Goodlette -Frank Road. Neither extensions nor enlargements of Collier County owned public water and sanitary sewer pipelines and facilities are proposed and hence no dedication of utilities to Collier County ownership is proposed at this time. On -site water and sanitary sewer utility pipelines and appurtenances shall be owned by the Collier County Public Services Division, Parks and Recreation Department. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid unto the City of Naples. Additionally, utility easements for proposed GRGP water and /or sanitary sewer facilities as may be required by the City of Naples will need to be dedicated by Collier County. Also see enclosed Item # 11 (Utility Provisions Statement) in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). 12. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: RESPONSE: See enclosed Item # 11 (Utility Provisions Statement) in the Rezone Application Submittal (GRAEF Letter Dated 13 July 2009). Project No. 2008- 4004.00 - W. Melissa Zone, Planner 13 July 2009 -2_ Gordon River Greemay Park Packet Page -80- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. REZONE — STANDARD (RZ) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W /COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receivine Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. "cavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239 - 690 -3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation 6e Prevention Plan ", L_DC Section 10',,0S A22 a (6)i -c. Fees: ® Application Fee: $6,000 + $25 per acre ® $100.00 Fire Code Review ® $750.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review ® $500.00 Pre - application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre - application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre - application meeting will be required). $2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee ❑ $1000.00 Listed /Protected Species Survey (If EIS not required) ® $925.00 Legal Advertising costs for CCPC meeting Ito be reconciled upon receipt of invoice from Naples Daily News). $500.00 Legal Advertising costs for BCC meeting Separate Check for Transportation Fees (Refer to Exhibit A): ® $500.00 Methodology Review Fee `Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting Fee Total $ 12, 775 Note: An additional fee for the 5t" and subsequent re- submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original tee. Applicant /Agent Signature Date Packet Page -81- # OF NOT REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Additional set if located in the Boyshore/Galeway Triangle Redevelo ment Area I Com feted A lication (download from websile for current form) 20 ❑ Pre -A lication meeting notes 20 ❑ Deeds Leaal's 2 ❑ List identifvinq Owner & all Parties of corporation 2 ❑ Owner /A ent Affidavit signed & notarized 2 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 2 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital /electronic copy of EIS or exemption iustification 3 ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 4 ❑ Utility Provisions Statement w /sketches 4 ❑ Surve , signed & sealed 4 ❑ Traffic Ica act Statement [TISJ or waiver (with applicable fees ) 7 ❑ Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined( min scaled 1 " =400' 5 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans ICDRom or Diskette I ❑ Project Narrative i 20 ❑ Site Plans 20 LN If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receivine Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. "cavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239 - 690 -3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation 6e Prevention Plan ", L_DC Section 10',,0S A22 a (6)i -c. Fees: ® Application Fee: $6,000 + $25 per acre ® $100.00 Fire Code Review ® $750.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review ® $500.00 Pre - application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre - application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre - application meeting will be required). $2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee ❑ $1000.00 Listed /Protected Species Survey (If EIS not required) ® $925.00 Legal Advertising costs for CCPC meeting Ito be reconciled upon receipt of invoice from Naples Daily News). $500.00 Legal Advertising costs for BCC meeting Separate Check for Transportation Fees (Refer to Exhibit A): ® $500.00 Methodology Review Fee `Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting Fee Total $ 12, 775 Note: An additional fee for the 5t" and subsequent re- submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original tee. Applicant /Agent Signature Date Packet Page -81- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION Coel County AFFIDAVIT 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (2391252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.coiliergov.net We /I, being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/1 am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief Well understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner Well further authorize J P Marchand P.E ofKimlev -Horn and Associates. Inc. to act as our /my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. ,Signatu e of Property (honer Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of (honer Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing inffrument was acknowledged before me this _V(,l day of 200 If , by ul% _who &Amsaaally known to me or has pr ed as identification. State of Florida (Signature of Notary Public -State of County of Collier �lorida___���7115 TONAW N SDh — q.; F MY COMAI3 Mt EE W078B o wiESOSUe. 11, 2014 (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Bo d1dThn NdiryPbF tl" ""°' 1 Name of Notary Public) ra CKet rage -ar = COWER COUNTY GOVMMENi Q�rr,'0F Z{SNING li hkpitl QEVE(.GPiNBNT RE1FEiW 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 2800 0111li*011SESHOE DRIVE 1WIAr Y+11 *lVA 34164 (239)403 -2400 FAX (239)643 -6968 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Date: Ei - Z 9- p ' Time: _ Firm: ��- 42 Zr L/e Project Name: - Applicant Name: Owner Owner Address: Phone: Assigned Planner. IK-0 !CSlc 2-&1,C�- Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In Sheet) 1k 1LAy3{7�'�itHC1- �Iy IL 72E8�'�'4V� Lj�C A••.•o �.�, Sys is NEC£SbA� � ALL PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO B� ROUTEDTO REVIEWERS Comments should be forwarded to the Planner o6or to the due date SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS & REC - Sid Kittils SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IMMOKALEE WATERISEWER DISTRICT ORIEMI - EMER. MGMT - Jim Von-Rirtetn IE ITIES ENGINEERING - Zarnira Deltoro v� CITY OF NAPLES, Robin Singer, Planning Director S Coordinator - Route Sheet only BAYSHORE IGATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT Executive Director Packet Page -83- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. NOTES: Packet Page -84- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W /COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelo menl Area or within 1/2 of City of Naples 1 Comp Application (download from website for current form) 20 Pre-Application meeting notes 20 Project Nortartive 20 Deeds/Le ars 2 List identifying in Owner & all earties of corporation 2 )C Owner/Agent Affidavit signed & notarized 2 JC Completed Addressing Checklist 2 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ` or ewmptiawjactifi crn 2 Digital /electronic copy of EIS I Historical Survey or waiver request _ 4 Utility Provisions Statement w sketches 4 Survey, signed ned & sealed 4 Traffic impact act Statement (TIS) or waiver (with o2plicable fees ) 7 Copy of Traffic impaci Statement (TIS) on CDROM 3 Aerial photographs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scaled 1 "=200'), showing FLUCCS Codes, Le end, and project boundary I i S ` 7� Electronic copy of all documents and plans (CDRom or Diskette ) I 1 Site Plans 1 20 If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239 -690 -3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan ", LDC Section 2.03,08A.2.a.(b)i.c. Fees: Application Fee: $6,000 + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof) $100.00 Fire Code Review $750.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review $500:00 Pre - application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre- application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and o new pre - application meeting will be required). [� $2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee $ or rotecte pedes surveyrei ew ee w s n ® $925.00 Legal Advertising costs for CCPC meeting $500.00 Legal Advertising costs for BCC meeting (To be reconciled upon receipt of invoice from Naples Daily News) Plagne attach 5Sparate Cltedc for Transportation Fees, (Refer to Exhibit Al: $500.00 Methodology Review Fee, If required *Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting Fee Total App(iconf /Agent Signature Duk Packet Page -8S- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS LAC 10.03.05 F.I. Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and comment on the application and before the Public 'Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission. Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.8.8. Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted .by the proposed land use change and who hove formally requested the County to be notified. A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the Zoning Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days priorto the scheduled date of the NIM. The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to, accommodate expected attendance. The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, Time of the meeting and legible site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one- foutth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM. The Collier County staff pioneer assigned to the project must attend the NIM and shall serve as :the fadlitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject property. The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy To the Zoning Department. As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the 'Zoning Department. These written commitments will be made a part of The staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusioninthe conditions of approval. Packet Page -86- 08,11A121009 18:30 FAX GAPA 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. rP24 `a CH6CRLIST = N0 Mt(dt#188>I OR DRIVE NAPI.EB, PLOrMAS"114 Please complata the following and fax to the Addressing 'Department at 239 -= 5nl$ or enhmlt in parson to it" Addraming Department at f)te above address. Form moat bg l ed h Addresac nnrso"I Prior to viersaaliratlan nwjine char apow 3 days for aroosaslnG. Not .ell Rams wgl apply to every pro)oat Items In bold tyro are required. Forms older than 6 months w11 regUIM additional review and approval by the Addressing Depatenent. PETITION TYPE (CheckAelft""balOw, complete aA"Mfe Addressing CheoAlisf W each PahtionType) BL (Biaeling Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) CemNevokous Permit Cu (Conditional Use) EXP (Expavubon Permit) FP (Foal Plat rs< RZ Plat) 0 SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (tribubstardial Change to SDP) ❑ SIP Mile Improvement Plan) ❑ SIP1(inwA*tardlal Chaltpe to SIP) C) SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ SNG (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ TDR (f ranter of Develapment Rill te) ❑ VA (Vartanos) 0 VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ VRSPP (Vagabdion Removal B Site Fill Permit) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of wNeof property or properties (copy of lengthy descrlpfien may be attached) 'l — L. -Q — 7.S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED 7 SHEETS. L -C-4S 3. C, i C'• 1 4 9"7 P�tzz:� Ptuc-� c., -i;4 -Ll Q -zs FOLIO (Property ro) NUM68R(a) Of ab�at(a bcl or assodafe With, legal deaOripf n Nmom than one) (1) 61940320009 - SHEET 3 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (2) 61940280000 - SHEET 4 OF 7 LEGAL. DESCRIPTION. (3) 6194TB00001 SHEET 5 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (4),61940200006 - SHEET 6 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (5) 00266160009 - SHEET 7 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (at ap We,Malmady&=lgnad) REFERENCED PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN THE QUADRANT EAST OF GOODLETTE ROAD AND SOUTH OF GOLDENGATF. PARKWAY. THE ONLY STREET ADDRESS IS FOR PARCEL (4) ABOVE —1590 GOODLETTE ROAD NORTH. r LOCATION MAP must be atlacned.- showing exact locetion Of pMeWs@e in re)adon to eeerest pUbW road rVi- Of-way Packet Page -87- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 10.JV FAA • SURVEY (ropy • neededordy for unplattedproperties) PROPOSED PROJECT COME (9WPIA adle) ?MhtG� Aj:¢r t e oziA f GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARKA COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PROJECT. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 7 FOR SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ALSO, SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 3-7 OF 7 FOR VICINITY MAPS WHICH SERVE AS LOCATION MAPS FOR THE PROPERTIES. PROPOSED STREET NAMES (Rappficable) NOT APPLICABLE. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (lereXWngpr*CfWzfies only) SDPSDP No. is pending. • orAR # Page 1 or2 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST • PAGE TWO Project or developnuni names mWowd for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; Wi ate whether pmposed or eatisiing) GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK, WHICH 18 A PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK AND NOT A CONDOMINIUM. Please Check One: Cheokiist is to be Faced back ❑ Personal eked Up APPLICANT NAME: VLADIMIR (VLAD)A.RY71W, P.E., PMP PHONE 239^495.4365 SAX 239-495.5517 1 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not oonatltute Project and /or Streat Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department. FOt{ STAFF -USE ONLY PrlmeryNumber .( C><g':n Address Number I j F C) :U 3, Addroaa Number I 151's Db S AddrsssNumber L5�2`6 c> D(n l5`�st9 Approved by,_.dJ v� n 1i 1' a. Date: b-i�— f 1 0 Updated by efft�- Packet Page -88- 0 O c z Z Z m o° n a m o. N IY a a L O Vol C Z Z m v ar V 1 Z N Z oA i N Uf �p N N N y 06 IN 0 rIENILA 3 m a c D � a N O ry� T � N O 3 fD y, N � N a a N 0 0 � o o 3 A O a 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 0 G O fD 2D 0 N tJ O O R �I d I �i > I I r D Z Z i Q) N I h !� I lu A III 31 W 3 nc z� v s ml D� f. Do ae _RQ O Vol C Z Z m v ar V 1 Z N Z oA i N Uf �p N N N y 06 IN 0 rIENILA 3 m a c D � a N O ry� T � N O 3 fD y, N � N a a N 0 0 � o o 3 A O a 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 0 G O fD 2D 0 N tJ O O R �I d I �i > \ _ E 3 7 \ i \ / § / ) \ s § � wnl�z- . . > f� < w ! \ ' r > X A - » [ . � � - � E � \ § ■ �, \\ k 7 B \ ® � { / \ 2 0 I � �_ C4 \ k �� . ■ \ �c , p ! o;© ¥ , � > 2 � � wnl�z- 0 GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK PROJECT Packet Page -91- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. FOLIO NUMBERS OR BOOK AND PAGE NUMBERS 1 61940200006 3950 -2563 3950 -2584 3950 -2572 2 61947800001 3950 -2563 3950 -2584 3950 -2572 3 00268160009 4013 -0757 Packet Page -91- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Details New Search 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 1 of 1 Property Record Aerial II++ Sketches II'' Trim Notices Current Ownership i Parcel Nolli 61940200006 Properly Address 1580 GOODLETTE RD N Owner Name COLLIER ONTY .Addresses 33O1TAMIAMI TRL.E City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112 •4961 Legal N7 C L. F: 274926'. LOTS 3,4,5 & 6, LESSOR =64464, LESS OR 55-407, LESS OR 76T.248, LESS OR 244.119.120, LESS W 20FT OF 'For more than four Mass of Legal Description please call the P aparty Appraiser's Ofa e. Section Townsbip Range Acres Map No. Strap No 37 1 11 _ 45.05 4A27 605200003.0004A27 "r9 L1912flt86L1fff Sub No. j 508200 .NAPLES IMP CO LITTLE `FARMS MI e r School Other Total S1ee Code 86 #GOVERNMENT 127 6.6990 $.8239 t2;322 'So InsmiC6ons'br Calwlallons 2010 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (subject to Change) it all Values shown below equal :0 tills parcel waa cmatedaflerlhe. Final Tax Roll Land Value $10,080;600(00 L Bate 1212005 121 ?006 Book-page 3950.2584 Amount E O:Ot (4) Impro"cil Value $ $11327.90 nj Market Value $11; {84,827 b0 W ON Exempt VAlae & Omer Exemptions $ 0.00 3950-267 f $17,006,700:0( - (a) A6aesliud Value $'11,494,62 00 12,12006 8950 -2683 560,493,400.01 (-}}Jomartead.and othecExampt Value _ 414;495 7100 as 1,2005 36yy.2111 $ O.Ot ( =J Taxabie4alue $0:00 091200A 3650. =8582 3117 -1622 $ A.O( $010( (5) School Taxable Value (Used for School Taxes $0.0 SOH ='Save OLrHomes' exempt value due to cap on assessment j�g4- 685 $ 3,916p0U;0t 42�00.2 2244.332 1501- -1040 $ 0.01 124L_ -1099 $0:0( NPw Searcb The Information is Updated Weekly. http: / /www.collieral) praiser. com /RecordDetail,asi)?Mai)= &FOligID--0000061940200006 4/512011 Packet Page -92- 41 Tint Map Page ] of 1 care +xv rmvMV Mw.�.« w�. m. caw. ceu�nr �•.�+r rowa.erk mmmmw c ono me mw amime rw unM+ -•ms nromwuon, w rarriusa .a�...ee n imai.e re w••uea bm• a•i. heroin, w u.a, w m nwaww�� oxnlwebmap /mapprint. Packet Page -93- _ __r._...___ __._ t— LANDSCf.PE &pap... 6/5/2009 Details NowSoarch Property Record Aerial Sketches Current Ownership Parcel No. 61947600001 ProparryAdaress I NO SITE ADDRESS Trim Notices 0 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 1 of I Sub No. ,II 506200 f NAPLES IMP 00 LITTLE FARMS I� MIIL39a_ALea� School Other Total a 86 'GOVERNMENT 11 19 5.6980 6.6239 32.322 'see instructions. for Oolculalmc 2010 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subloct to change) If all values shown, below equal 0 this parcel was emitted after the Final Tax Roll Land Value $-at tN4;00 —YImproved pate Book -. Page -Amount Value Stl "00: 1212605 3960 -2564 $0.01 (= )Market Value 591s74A:dA 1272005 $950-2572 $'17,006,700.0( (- )SOHExempt Valus 4 Other '.Exemptions $0.40' = Assessed Value $49,744:00 4212006 3960- -2563 $00,493,400.0( ) Hameetead:andotherExempt Value $81,144.00 08124o6 3870 -2441 $0.0( [ °J Taxatil6-value 5 0,00 (1 School Taxable Value. (Us ad for School Taxas $ 0.00 0812005 3870-2100 $ 0.0( 0912004 3650-3587 $ 0,0f SOH -'Save Our Homes' exempt vakre due to cap on.assessmenl kiereases: 0942002 .0119 -9822 $0.0( 0812602 3089., 226 $ 00( 0812002 3089-204 , Mill 0611966 2080: -:413 $.0A( NewSoaroh The Information is Updated Weekly. http:Nwww.collier appraiser. coiivRecordDctaii.asn ?lrlan= &FolioID= 0000061947800001 4/5/2011 Packet Page -94- Map Page 1 of ] 'jp.]OOI. Colw Cwnty PgpeNy /ppr ."""Color County Piwerry A m e o M mmmgw n oMedM V moel a Mere opb w Ynlarmel w rime *Wme M M.Mo4w an povitleC w t 01b Mme. Y . or ILL UNrytNMbn. _ i f 1 a f Packet Page -95- W: / /www. collierappraiser .com /webmap /mapprint.aspx roue— &onent= LANDSCkPE&pap... 6/5/2009 1 Details Now Search 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 1 of 1 Pro a p rtY Record Aerial Sketches Trim Notices _ lCurrent Ownership Parcel No, 00268160009 11 Property Address I NO SITE ADDRESS Owner Natural COLLIER CNTY- Arldresseall 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E Cityll NAPLES 11 Slat. FL 2lp 3$112.4961 Legal 1134 49 25 SE114 OF NE114 NE114 Of SE114 E OF CREEK, LESS BEG AT INTER E BM STORTER SID WITH N RM LI OF 'Far more than four lines of Legal Description plea" call the Property Appraiser's Office. section Township Range. _ Acres Map Nn. Strap No. 34 1 49 1 26 11 43.54 11 4A34 11 492514006.OD04A34 1 M_11lag2Rates sub No. 100 ACREAGE HEADER III Area Bchnol Other Total Uae: Cy,Oa 86 GOVERNMENT 13 5:6800 6.8258 12.322 'See inkfudime 10, Calculaticns 2010 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) It all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was Created afterlhe Final Ta Roll Land Value 5 618 60.00 Data Book -Page Amovdt ( } "8ppfopod Value i 0,45 _ :0412006 4013 -757 ; 2,086,900.0( (n1 Maxat Value ( -) ' SOHEllemptValue B: Other Exemptions ;000 0412005 373 946 ;0.0( (V esaeta Value S 6 8,8$0A0 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 878;850:00 (= )Taxable Value I (=) School Taxable Value (Used for School Ta $0.001 SOH - -'Save Our Homes' exempt value due to rap ow assessmard Increases. New Search The Information is Updated Weekly. http: /fwww. col)ierappraiser. cam/ RecordDet,;I -- gXA--'—P•U-1:oID= 0000000268160009 4/5/2011 Packet Page -96- Print Map Folio 00268160009 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. O 20N Colher County ProgM Appeue[ MTWe Me Collar County pMMM Morneer o rnmmiME up pr ndin, the mmI ecwnu and uplu4ate inlomulwn, no "nanhee expeeMO or Inplpo ere gorkeo lertee data harem its we, Of as mulprolatron. http:// www .collierappraiser.com/webmap /rr Packet Page -97 Folio %2000268160009 &ori... 5/17/2011 3153295 OR: 3950 PG: 2563 This instrument was prepared RECORD" in OPPICIRL 11COUS of COLLIEI COU", it without review or opinion of title by 12115/2005 it 04:31PR D►ICB7 1. BROCI, C1111 John M. Passidomo CheffyPassidomo WES 50493375 ",00 Wilson & Johnson, LLP 1EC fit 78,00 821 Fifth Avenue South DOC -.70 3534S3,80 Naples, Florida 34102 Etta: (239) 261 -9300 CBIff3 PRSSIDOEO E7 lL 821 STE HE 8 }201 WARRANTY DEED EAPLIS PL 34102 THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the J— day of December, 2005, by Charles Fleischman III, as to an undivided 49.61% interest in the hereivAescribed property, whose post office address is Fleischrnamn Enterprises, 4001 Carew Tower, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and Dorette L. Fleischmann Viets aWa Dielle Fleischman Viets, as to an undivided 25.195% interest in the herein - described property, whose post office address is c% Mr. Philip Lawrence, Inverness Counsel, Inc., 545 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022 (singularly or collectively "Grantor"), to The Trust for Public Land, a California not for profit corporation, whose post office address is 1595 Bay Street SE, Suite 3, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 (singularly or collectively "Grantee "): (Wherever used herein, the terms instrument and the hems, legal s rs uccessors and assigns of co WITNESSETH: and other valuable consii sells, aliens, remises, reh and to that certain land s: See Composite Exhibits TOGETHER with all anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, "Grantee" include all parties to this ns of individuals, and the sum of Ten Dollars (110.00) d, hereby grants, bargains, undivided 74.805 % interest in by reference (the "Property ") thereto belonging or in AND, the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same againstthe lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxesifor the current year for that portion of the Property identified by Parcel Identification No. 61940200006 and taxes for subsequent years for that parcel and the balance of the Property; zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental authority, restrictions and easements common to the subdivision; outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; undated lease agreement between Naples Zoo, Inc. and The Trust for Public Land, and any right, title or interest arising thereunder, and the Permitted Exceptions described on Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein by reference. GRANTORS HEREBY represent and warrant that the Property is not Grantors' Florida homestead; that neither Grantors nor Grantors' family reside at the Property or on adjacent property; and that Grantors, in fact, reside at: Charles Fleischman III residence address: Dorette L. Fleischman Viets residence address: 9575 Cunningham Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45243; Over the Grass Farms, 3370 Whitewood Road, The Plains, Virginia 20198, Packet Page -98- OR: 3950 PG: 2564 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has signed and scaled these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered as to Each Grantor in the Presence of: Packet Page -99- OHIO 3!2009 OR: 3950 PG: 2565 ,e �ll.•,e��sl..r�ii. fay ,;,: �,.A�.. - ®►t ,> .► A XT. r STATE OF 1 COUNTY OF The foregoing inshvment was eclmowledged before me this /41�4 day of Dcoember, 2005, by Dorene L. F eitclustann Vie% aWa DkUe �Viets, who is personally known to me or who hay prvdux���///d+a t.:.! aP . ficatian_ I m a NotaryPublic in the State of y�. t PI uu"W . MIysIIIwCMiKCwwY�Mw�Re�ltp r�,bxpires: .i/, .2A°P: Packet Page -100- OR: 3950 PG: 2566 Exhibit A PARCEL 16 - SIGN ISLAND island in 17th Ave. North, Block 38, Tier 10, Official Record Book 240, Page 93, TOWN OF NAPLES, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 1, page 8, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida PARCEL 18 A -3 All that part of Lot 9, of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION, lying South of Golden Gate Parkway, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public RecordsofColher'County, Florida. PARCEL 18 C The East 564 feet of the West 1184 feet of Lot 8, of NAPLES UvIPROVEMENf COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDMSION, less road right -of -way granted in Official Records Book 876, Page 1718, according to the map or plat thereof on file an re in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in the Pyb�%Wcr.Cot nty, Florida. PARCEL 18 D A('v;�,' -�<J-- The East 470 feet of West FARMS SUBDIVISION = PARCEL 18 E _ All of Lot 8, NAPLES IMPR r �� COMPAldY IT1LE ~ S, except the West 1654 feet according to the plat thereof in Plat Book 2, P Pu orris of Collier County, Florida; the East and West boundary b 'd Parcel being meal the West line of said Lot 8 (said West line of Lot 8 lying 25.00 feet Notth.and S fkr ediam line of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier (� `. ' C1R IT COMPANY'S LITTLE of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 18 F The East 338.24 feet of the West 958.34 feet of Lot 7, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, per Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, less and except that portion deeded to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida described as: Commence at the Northwest comer of said Lot 7; thence N 89 degrees 17'39" East along the North line of said Lot 7 for a distance of 620.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along the North line of said Lot 7 a distance of 41.60 fat to the point of intersection with the point of curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 813.94 feet and a central angle of 26 degrees 13'03"; thence continue Southwesterly along said curve an arc distance of 51.30 to a point; thence N 00 degrees 39' 49" West 30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 1 of 3 Packet Page -101- OR: 3950 PG: 2567 PARCEL 18 G North 112 of Lot 7, less the West 1288.34 feet, NAPLES D*IPROVEMENT COMPANYS LITTLE FARMS, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 - A thra E Lots 3, 4, and 5 of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; together with all buildings thereon; subject to the following easements of record to Florida Power & Light Company relating to adjacent Lot 6; (a) An easement dated June 10th, 1953, recorded in Deed Book 30 at Page 395 of said Public Records; and (b) An easement dated June 10th 1953, recorded in Deed Book 30 at Page 397 of said Public Records. LESS AND EXCEPT: Part of Lot 3, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT CO'S LITTLE FARMS, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, lying Easterly and Southerly of the following described line; Commencing at a concrete 114 comer of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier South line of said Section North 89 degrees 26' 09" East 753.94 to a South 0 55" East 334.85 feet to a concrete monument on the South line of and $te Point.of of the described line; thence along said described line and the W parcel North 0 degrees 21' 55" West 211.15 feet to a concrete at er described Parcel; thence along said described line and the N North 89 degrees 38' 05" East 729.90 feet to a concrete 8' 05" East 13 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of try} FARMS and the Point of Ending of said described Line, r' PARCEL 19 F The Westerly %: of Lot 39 and Lot and the East 45 feetof Lot 44, " and recorded in the =office of the Clerk of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. f� P�mSUBDIVISION, Lots 41, 42 and 43 g to the map or plat thereof on file recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 84, in the Lot 2, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, except area described in Deed Book 22, Page 393, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and less West 25 feet and right-of-way located in Collier County, Florida and except parcel deeded to Collier County Conservancy, Inc, as Parcel 2 in Official Records Book 767, Page 249, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, page 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida PARCEL 19 G All of Lot 97 of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, lying South of Golden Gate Parkway, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Page 2 of 3 Packet Page -102- OR; 3950 PG; 2568 PARCEL 19 H In North '/a of North'. %s of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, being at the Northwest comer of the section and run East 1398.25 feet; thence South 64 degrees West 1555.06 fee; thence North 664.01 feet to the place of beginning, Collier County, Florida PARCEL 19I Lot 6, NAPLES R",ROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION, less additional road right -of -way for Goodlette -Frank Road, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 J A lot or parcel of land lying in Lot 2 of NAPLES HOROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, per plat in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, which lot is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line GORDON RIVER HOMES per Plat IWI run Northerly parallel to the West WLat� South line of said Lot for 180 f tun Southo South line of said Lot thence W g Being the same ptemiscs Collier County, Florida- Road- THE FOREGOING LANDS A ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A -1 F:\wpd=VtElF1=Whrt,um;at aMocd NI DUCUMWTS.WPd PARCEL 16) Page 3 of 3 is the Northwest corner of Lot 50 of s Records of Collier County, Florida, thence run Easterly parallel to the =then of said Lot for 217.5 feet to 18o to Point of Beginning. Page 393, Public Records of htof- -way for Goodlenc -Frank METES AND BOUNDS ON ALL F[FMWAANN ro TPL Packet Page -103- N OR: 3950 PG: 2569 A IMWan N 3wllan U. To."&* 19 SYIR AMP 25 7wt CNaw Cw.y, Flwla...a . Pw N M n, M.fb. w,M...+.1 Col UN. F. Y m n, Mt *wh 2 at pWO. 2 N Ut Pmh mw w N Cafe Caw!*. FWwt wwp Irlar. a.Vw" *sorb" Y 10w.1 *a*l• N wa ftpr .W wraw of S.dbn A. Toon** w faa*4 =aqa t4 2aL C~ C1o*y. rm Yrw Msr49;f L ow" W fw o M of atw no" 3& a iMo4a N 1,3s*.24 leak Of -m W3013'W. a o"m N 1.'!75:7* 1W U w MrftM warrar N Baba" JOWOM a mm," In FW La* 24, N f p 20, d ON PWk Wa44oa N CWGV fl �", Os" *l*rca LW3rl W. do" Ua oW b N mW xaaae Pnht Of NIIMm N KLit hat to w LwlwaN atMw d tot *7 W Mina bloc ms" to', Lka Fenn a mwdW n: Ad ft* -E as hp 2 at Ma pum fwwn4 N CaOw CWA*. pwftr Ufbo 11rwsr1r. "bap ow f alh M N fab {et 17 o "!"taut N 5.1403* f..t w'P.im.0 wM aauafnp WNWI7 Of b nrI b* Y M N *N mlw} Ywa N M *anon IO+ar, tlr4rlw nwWMy .Wq =w e.M td*n aetr On N as aOW4 s N w wVae JWW YYbi�q or 0u m0atbg aoearla" awwdw b w L10 , I K W abort rtlwwwY 'PWN r tllMwa It*1WIll 1. a /lure of 76M Ink *Ialwa M.V=Vrf- Of iMMw N 710. laa* merles M CWW L e Mtwma N 1"Ad, !Y¢ *Iwm M2r4T2rW. a dwwws W.10M Itw Halm x:1T30' wr •*,Halt" N MOD h" twaw, manrYTW. a ,IWO w N 423-30 ha* U.aa4 M1r/3VrL a dMwm N iR17 taat DOW MMUMM a acorn of 93:17 hat Aana KWW47L a arb.e N 431J0 rat lfa k=13 T - a •awaa. N 410.5* hot Tier+ a.1*'WarL . ww..w w f" %a ft b bd omdm .b 0q ll b *M -W-m 7wa N ado" ow Of W, Tam wa.*Q aan anwmr bt AMWIM MM - Oar a*U AM- ol-.p7 1*w or Wt 'Oaw fth hr a dWaws al 374-33 wt w r'. nwnwewa orb 10 Gat *w 0 w La4waw 1 /4'w SYYM b, T W&Wp of S.0. now is it: wsew A*r1w1PL weep um Waw %a a da N L1*7.22 w.{ w aw .Par w MwjM0. Itgslbw Mkt A pw4.n N tale L k..b0 .2 N rlCpin ImwewmMl Co'. UW. Fall. w ..Yrwtl in plat It s 2 d Fq. 2 wax hbh r.Mma of Cafes G"l7. FMr1r. as .W w a owd" N lax M and w w Y N lals 40 Ww*n 42 w G o.n ftk a moan& w Tees w in PW rwh 2 M pea. M N we pate sswraa N Coawr Cs y. FWb. b.*q T.Ia pvNvrb,17 a..mbe Y we.m ♦ri1M N M xafYwat aenw of 4lwwlry Plata a./an ores 211 w w pY*a. Wawra N Ci.r Onnp, FYrbe add aanl "4 w caw ParbaF. me a*nI . Mwl w aces N 4 .2. -wnpw swat to 9m a mia *130.7 IAN. as .wwa o taw* t L SLU Ink M" 0w m arb add 4alAb r♦WR -N -wY W. WwhM. a - N OSET3f. p d6 or s 5 IM pant N ores N . nor largaN "aces w n. 1.h N pow 4m M37413 -*. a - N 11x07 fort aaa hdwrq a aWm a.aHq w M;Sr34 E1 wwhmWy nape M -ar Lori pm-.# w Oa. W.Yga •."fluor •nVn N ri o . 7?Tfaap M2Ir L. 4*4 aW scalp rlam- Y••.a7 JIM a 4 w i% ret a w lw aM1.- a 1335 Iwt a *arwd ~ of 777977, ar a aWws W M71T1 6.. -I M W4 aN* swo aPm- "5-117 des. a Off a . N 0aa, a daUaw of 727.41 hat es 7116* r cad. 'It .aakW M d bw antwy'ar. N aw:JW*w IO.M wx N M Oaaw.l0.w aNq .pp+Wnx+al by som w a aiwwaa N W LM of ilitll b LWI 2 16 11w d o Iwo' d Cu Tat d - T "haul! I N w Pawl. rW W d I W Cawll7. a I t wt aNa axtn**r irw. 3MM M N 1!14 Ih.rllf M N t 7: Wt 7, a 1 :72 feat m 0', i*asaaaw at 4 Wept 12570.34 tof N sd* WI 7; axes. wM7 M N w Nest IL0.74 14.e 7, s". kA dtbrw. N Lot 1414,74 . d M 4 *aefoea4an Or N aaY ld 7: i Yr awU 0rra N .d* tat 7, • 6 w a N 72.11 feat .111, W Us cad M w M a m 1M T; lr ti.Orti% um alum ax awl b N Ow 0 N f- tpt 7. 4 fWOnn r L i L75 kn NU ra aaoU h. al Oda IN t, L awp tM awes 7, a itlarm d Dow f r 'Pdm Cr eat of a-Ah ly Of b N b •ldorf we N Yes OaeOan 1Gar, Uv, a.Awy alwq I 4. 1t s wale Www U4 flour aar..aw im1 tl31 Mara rwwwr M. Tani C" of 424.311 l I rnwa A/l'la'Jof i a a.ww. N 7a1 w Iwb M. oftw •]sm a I.b. a " L12711TA, a P." z at 30.7.07 tort w b Imw C"or a2A A xwrr w N laaa. 4w m. W n 01IwMl 1104011,031 llLM 7h N P•Oa 2M w era ►n00 0aaam N fO Oft Leap F AWI #wqa srra0'10'fY. a4q Ns .cam, ,b M N caw Ibawwsa 1214 a hW W N 720 ;0 Ir* 0 Ol lr,*C'1 lira o, a Wes YN M N .aM 1bw L r0... a dices. n PM 9 hw w b Mwularwr .06 b aft fna N W' 3: M Myw. awl LOMO a w n"o"ne" r 1!a* LM 2 N. WPaa 2 t Or' Pa In NW Wa d OMll11 C0.W7#7: Papop 39 0 ft * 5071* w COWS WQ no. irifG: • ffjoka.Of � hal BrMOff 1pttnnlrw agl. *w w� Mw of tM jo at tWa n ices iMaw w cores*" in fM raw 2 N Popt 14 N M POaL Sam* OF r4ow Caw" Fiwrq ll a N*mww. 4pwlp tb -osal 60 Of w oYl "* d aM fa A ■ AYtliw/aNf*USM hal. b L i rawilOM tl* kw WNM ma AMM a�/Nww of 314,00 ww. tr WOO kwan0M WM " "Not 1r of fla long"! Mat k tat M of wpt' *011M W w Mwaac tittle mmas w. olwq add wN Mt ..a ipWm d 13600 1wt w b nlrasarY a*A tW MR% fro N tore IM we tl1 L WA*4"- Yprlp 14 wn1'6. N wk 4M fFn.I x.w.a a M12et 'N 334J4 law. w G **wv ww N1 aw iad Apm- N^.a7.ix N anwNSp FrMI Awe: wam NAVAWIN. "" "M OW N/mwl -.a7 b4. ♦ dlaaw w 4704E leap rwm kjwwtrw. Mn* ids ow dlm -al•mM amt a doom R 7473" N.0 Om..s M01/a7rW. "" aa1* wo nIW -ai +R rx. a dMm o of 170521 ,last W 00 aadba*w aaaw of OW W.W. 111 M . V x M10W12 r- Mrq warm a. N now SLWN a PIi't !arm of 30f:M ha* 1llanaW kwir GW- I*" if* ml -Mafor fd* W.",t vwm o dwmwa N 34122 feat la m PONE OF �iMIG Tbb b w7 a *any. A PORnON OF SWRON !E7, 34 AND 35, TOIIiNSMF 49 S., UNO1323 L. ....a.2........M� MrYe.a w- a ,.. ROn flf Aw ta-flr mgzw4 70-17" ]r' BIT xA -1•` Packet Page -104- OR; 3950 PG; 2570 ]. Rights ofparties in possession of that leased portion of the insured property commonly known as "Jungle Larry's" under unrecorded Lease Agreements and all sublessees thereof, including without limitation rights under Memorandum of Lease recorded in O.R. Book 2893, Page 916, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 2. Riparian and littoral rights are not insured (Parcels 19A -E, 19 -I, 18 G. 18 E, 18 A -3, 19 G, and 19H). 3. The inalienable right of the public to use the navigable waters covering or adjacent to the lands (Parcels 19A -E, 19 -I, 18 G, 18 E, 18 A -3, 19 G, and 19H). 4. This policy does not insure an f d parcel lying waterward of the mean -high water line of the Gordon R o tis 19A -E, 19 -1, 18 G, 18 E, 18 A -3, 19 G, and 19H). GQ 5. Restrictions, Bondi' Ei01151CRiL attt rand a tters contained on the Plat of Naples Lmprave Co s%tle Rgms, as \reco in lat Book 2, Page(s) 2, Public 6. Easement in A" November 14,195 Records of Collier Florida (Parcel 19 fined in instrument recorded R Book 246, Page 59, Public 7. Easement in favor o Power & Light tasted in instrument recorded November 14, 1953, - 0, Page 395, Pub of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 n. L' CtW, 8. Easement in favor of Florida Power g t Company, contained in instrument recorded November 14, 1953, Deed Book 30, Page 397, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 191). 9. Easement in favor of Florida Power & Light Company, contained in instrument recorded June 21, 1960, OR Book 66, Page 301, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 I & Parcel 19 A -E) t'I 10. Easement in favor of Florida Power & Light Company, contained in instrument recorded August 22, 1967 O.R. Book 244, Page 631, Public Records of Collin County, Florida (Parcel 19 A -E). 1 1. Easement in favor of Collier County, contained in instrument recorded September 12, 1985, O.R. Book 1155, Page 233, Public Records of Collier County. Florida (Parcel 19 A -E). 12. Easement in favor of Collier County, contained in instrument recorded April 28, 1995, O.R. Book 2053, Page 1696 as corrected & re- recorded at O. R. Book 2098, Page 1826, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 n. Packet Page -105- ***-OR: 3950 PG: 2571 *'kz 13. Right of Entry recorded in O.R. Book 2999, Page 3091, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (19 A -E, 180, 1S E, 191, 18 A -3 & 19 G) 14. Resolution No. 89 -5753 recorded in O.R. Book 1603, Page 1508, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 15. Right -of -Way Deed recorded in O.R. Book 66, Page 432, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 16. Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 2735, Page 1135, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 A -E) 17. Easement in favor of City of Naples, contained in instrument recorded April 1, 1975, O.R. Book 615, Page 1572 as modified at O.R. Book 785, Page 351 & O.R. Book 785, Page 361, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 18 E). 18. Easement in favor of Donald Stonebumer, et al, contained in instrument recorded January 16, 1973, O.R. Book 499, Page 56, Pu Collier County, Florida (Parcel IS C, 18 D, & 18 E). ��R0 \jx , 19. Easement in favor of nc., contained in irttl` Y recorded November 20, 1978, O.R. Book 783, Page 436, fie Collier County, (Parcel 18 F). 20. Easement contained re 5, 1 R. Book 227, Page 40, Public Records of Collier M. 21. Easement in favor instrument recorded May 26, 1978, O.R. Book 7S rlra 7, Pub it or f Col r Florida. (Parcel 18 F). 22. Easement contained ' t recorded Jaau IL Book 182, Page 881, Public Records of Collier (Parcel 18 F). 23. Easement in favor of F) y, contained in instrument recorded September 9, 1980, O.R. Book be Records of Collier County, Florida. (Parcel 19 A -E). 24. Any liewprovided by County Ordinance or by Ch. 159, F.S., in favor of any city, town, village or port authority, for unpaid service charges for services by any water systems, sewer systems or gas systems serving the land described herein; and any lien for waste fees in favor of any county or municipolity. 25. Any rights in favor of third parties arising from the following matters of survey as depicted on WilsonMiller survey dated July 6, 2004, revised August 15, 2005, and bearing File No. 4G -125A: 1. Drainage ditch running East and West across Parcel 19F; 2. Guy wire anchors, traffic signal poles, grid utility poles located along the Western boundary of the insured property outside of any easement area; and 3. Lift station and related utility equipment located in the Northwestern corner of Parcel 18F outside of any easement area. FArFdFeVlPF44d�mw'n Wr WJVCUm g - .ken jk' d 8 Packet Page -106- 3753299 OR: 3950 PG: 2584 III- RICOMID in OIIICIAL RIM0 of COLLAR CM11, YL 1211912005 at 04:40PI DRIM? 1. IROCI, CLIRI RIC III 35,30 DOC-.TO -30 Reta: CDIYIT PUSIDOIO If AL 821 STI A9I S #201 RAPLIS R 34102 WARRANTY DEED (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) THIS INDENTURE, made this 19th day of December A.D. 2005, between THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND, a non - profit CalNomia corporation, whose address is 306 N_ Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32301, Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdhrision of the State of Florida, whose address is 3301 Tam!pwA- Naples, Florida 34112, Grantee . pa parrties to this in and assigns. "Gr context requires WITNESSETH: Dollars and other good the receipt whereof is Grantee, and Grantee Collier County, Florida, reference made a part Include all the r a, successors; plural, as the genders.) aration of the sum of Ten hand paid by said Grantee, led and sold to the said iituate, lying and being in dtached hereto and by this This conveyance is su a) easements, limitations and conditions of record if any now exist, but any a the n terminated are not hereby re- imposed, (b) to takes for the curte rs, unless said Grantee is exempt therefrom, (c) to the access easement ra s described on Exhibit "A ", (d) the lease by and between Naples Zoo, Inc and Grantor, as such lease has or wil bel gned to Grantee, and (e) all subleases of the Naples Zoo, Inc. parcel , including, without limitation rights under a Memorandum of Lease recorded in O.OR. Book 2893, Page 916, Public Records of Collier County. Florida. AND the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Grantor has hereunto set Grantors hand and seal, the day and year first above written. - THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAXES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 201.02(6), FLORIDA STATUTES. THIS CONYEYA11M ACtltiMD SY THE ti i OF QWJWY 61111111111MI011ERS, Comm FLOR2t#A, D*TfISO!f Packet Page -107- M This Instrument Prepared By: .yam Donna H. Smith x The Trust for Public Land 4267 NW Federal Highway Box 120 ! Jensen Beach, FL 34957 \ V 3753299 OR: 3950 PG: 2584 III- RICOMID in OIIICIAL RIM0 of COLLAR CM11, YL 1211912005 at 04:40PI DRIM? 1. IROCI, CLIRI RIC III 35,30 DOC-.TO -30 Reta: CDIYIT PUSIDOIO If AL 821 STI A9I S #201 RAPLIS R 34102 WARRANTY DEED (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) THIS INDENTURE, made this 19th day of December A.D. 2005, between THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND, a non - profit CalNomia corporation, whose address is 306 N_ Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 32301, Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdhrision of the State of Florida, whose address is 3301 Tam!pwA- Naples, Florida 34112, Grantee . pa parrties to this in and assigns. "Gr context requires WITNESSETH: Dollars and other good the receipt whereof is Grantee, and Grantee Collier County, Florida, reference made a part Include all the r a, successors; plural, as the genders.) aration of the sum of Ten hand paid by said Grantee, led and sold to the said iituate, lying and being in dtached hereto and by this This conveyance is su a) easements, limitations and conditions of record if any now exist, but any a the n terminated are not hereby re- imposed, (b) to takes for the curte rs, unless said Grantee is exempt therefrom, (c) to the access easement ra s described on Exhibit "A ", (d) the lease by and between Naples Zoo, Inc and Grantor, as such lease has or wil bel gned to Grantee, and (e) all subleases of the Naples Zoo, Inc. parcel , including, without limitation rights under a Memorandum of Lease recorded in O.OR. Book 2893, Page 916, Public Records of Collier County. Florida. AND the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Grantor has hereunto set Grantors hand and seal, the day and year first above written. - THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAXES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 201.02(6), FLORIDA STATUTES. THIS CONYEYA11M ACtltiMD SY THE ti i OF QWJWY 61111111111MI011ERS, Comm FLOR2t#A, D*TfISO!f Packet Page -107- M Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: (Signature of first witness) rY (. •Sri (T7Y (Printed name of first witness) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Ca'C,c-r The foregoing instr 2005, by c California cor rai on, on or has produced � IIfffi a � �Yr��l ly.: ti A red as to i 3 i sufflcfenct t Assistant 'COOKY Attorney EllanJ. Chabwell OR: 3950 PG: 2585 1 THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND, a non -profit CaUfomia corporation By _ (( . } orl e - C- t C S (CORPORATE SEAL) Co Vj L CI a this 19th day of December, r Public Land, a non -prord rson is personally known to me on. tY PUBLIC (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) f 4 OR: 3950 PG: 2586 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SIGN ISLAND (Parcel I.D. #17830000027) Island in 170 Ave. North, Block 38, Tier 10, Official Record Book 240, Page 93, Town of Naples, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 8, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (Parcel I.D. 061940200006 and 6194032009) Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Naples according to the plat the of Collier County, Flo following easements adjacent Lot 6: (a) �e 30 at Page 395 of ai P1 1953, recorded in except the'foltowi d -b Part of Page 2, Pd Easterly and F M @ Cny's Little Farms k 2 at Page 2, Puings thereon; suto fforida Light Company relating to tdalli e 1 1"3, recorded in Deed Book s; a d (b) me It dated June 10"' i Public Records; less and E, s Improve any's Little Farms plat d in Plat Book 2, in County, Florida, lying k!wir� described line: Commencing at a concrete monument at the South % comer of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the South Line of said Section North 89 degrees 26' 09' East 753.94 to a point; thence South 0 degrees 21' 55' East 334.85 feet to a concrete monument on the South line of said Lot #3 and the Point of Beginning of the described line; thence along said described line and the Westerly boundary of the herein described parcel North 0 degrees 21' 55' West 211.15 feet to a concrete monument at the Northwest corner of said described Parcel; thence along said described line and the Northerly boundary of said described parcel North 89 degrees 38' 05' East 729.90 feet to a concrete monument; 3 Packet Page -109- >t>rx OR. 3950 PG. 2587 thence continue North 89 degrees 38'050 East 13 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of Lot 3, Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms Subdivision and the Point of Ending of said described Line. (Parcel I.D. #61947800001) All of Lot 97 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms Subdivision, lying South of Golden Gate Parkway, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (Parcel I.D. #61940280000) Lot 6 of Naples Improvement C a� ' the Farms Subdivision, less additional road right -Df -way for Ing to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in tic Records of r ounty, Florida, subject to a reservation by Gra for i for a permanent, non- exclusive 60 -foot s: nm 9 t the North 60 feet of the West 950 feet of Company's Little Farms Subdivision. Containing 129.98 ::f more or less' 2"FIE CIA This imnametCwacptepared opium Ion M P mom by Chaffy Wilson & Johnso n, a, I.LP 821 Fitch Avenue 102 Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 261 -9300 TRUSTEES'DEED �s 3753296 OR: 3950 PG: 2572-: 13CM D IN 011ICIAL IICOIDS of 12/19/2505 at 04:31F1 DVIGU 1. lets: CIRM SAISIDM If AL VI RI AN S #201 Dl#LDS IL 34202 CO11I11 mum, 11 owl, CM1 CONS 17006625..00 He ni 01151 DOC•.70 119044190 THUS TRUSTEE'S DEED made the f g day of December, 2005, by Dorette L. Fleischman Viets, Melanie Fleischman Garnett and Charles Fleischman V, as Co- Trustees under the Trust established for the benefit of Dorette L. Fleischman Vida under Article Seventh B. of the Last Will and Testament of Dorette K. Fleischman, Deceased, dated September 10, 1992, as to an undivided 25.195% interest in the berefn- described property, whose post office address is c/o Mr. Philip Lawrence, Inverness Counsel, Inc., 545 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, (hereinafter called ;the "Grantor "), to The Trust for Public Land, a California not for profit corporation, whose post office address ,is����ttreet SE., Suite 3, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 (hereinafter called the "Grantee "): c l/ C-AR �- �T;\ (Wherever used herein the terms " and "Grantee" inc parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and a, and the su and assigns of corporations) WITNFSSETH: of sum of Ten Dollars and other valuable considerations, grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys d o 25.195% interest in all that certain land situate in Collier See Composite Exhibits A andW.,Attached hereto and in4Cp*tp#7q Lein by reference (the "Property' GRANTOR hereby oo GrantWthe tK good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said lan d and her nd for any acts of Grantor and will defend the same against the lawful claim if by, through or under the said Grantor, except taxes for the4current year for that porch identified by Parcel Identification No. 61940200006 and taxes for subsequent years for that parcel and the balance of the Property, zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; restrictions and easements common to the subdivision; outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; undated lease agreement between Naples Zoo, Inc. and The Trust for Public land, and any right, title or interest arising thereunder; and the Permitted Exceptions described on Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein by reference. GRANTORS HEREBY represent and warrant that the Property is vacant land and not Grantors' Florida homestead; that neither Grantor nor Grantors' family reside at the Property or on adjacent property; and that Grantors, in fact, reside at: Dorette L. Fleischmann Viets residence address: Melanie Fleischmamr Garnett residence address: Charles Fleischmann V residence address: Over the Grass Farms, 3370 Whitewood Road, The Plains, Virginia 20198; 698 Titicos Road, North Salem, New York 10560; 5330 Homeville Road, Oxford, Pennsylvania 19363 -1033. Packet Page -111- OR; 3950 PG; 2573 IN WfINESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has executed these presents on the day and year fist above written. Signed, sealed delivered in (I Ptittted Nunn ��o — I a ®ana (o- -Ts UiSwader the Trust for the benef t of Dorette L. Fleiachmann Vim under Article Seventh B. of the Last WID and Testament of Dorette K Fleisehmano, Deceased, dated September 10, M2, tadNiu /!5v9 3 _ f Z.Epn STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing im Dorette L Fleischman 1. 1 v v � a � day of December, 2005, by to me or who has produced a Notary Public in the State of NM= _ �� MF �1F c v Packet Page -112- zwIr a 3' V`iT/ _• r day of December, 2005, by to me or who has produced a Notary Public in the State of NM= _ �� MF �1F c v Packet Page -112- zwIr a 3' OR: 3950 PG: 2574 Siped, sealed and delivered in our presence: Printed Nam: i N m Garnam L*ur=m awer =0 Treat for the baselft of Darefte L. PUSCIMMIRD Vista under Article Seventh B. of the Lea Will and Testament of Doraft IL Flelachassun, Decastsed, dated Septeniber 10, 1992, Cnri Marc Printed Naar: -pht MA STATE OF Co (I COUNTY OF day of December, 2005, by The foregoing' so I ged before Fiek&!Rann who is to me or who has produced Public in the State of •TYPO nt UDY BIZIER Cl 1 CIE UWjc, Stale of Now York V, tY Packet Page -113- OR: 3950 PG: 2575 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: - Printed Name: L= G,'LtArCharies Ftelseboamm V, Co- Trustee Rader the Trost for the benefit of B. or the L. Last Will and Testament ender Article Seventh B. of the Last WiR and Testament of Dorette K. Fleischman, Deceased, dated September i - 10,1992, 1 Printed- , �-+�- STATE OF +Jd a COUNTY OF The foregoing iasnvme before me this day of (o }it- 200 hY 1 Trostea, who is personally lmown to we or who has produced r ` t'C identification. } o' AR r lit I Notary Pobpc, t� N0.., Red in Qltgfnt caannisAo I EsPhss neettabw CIIR h ;;: F:1wp0ocsVlElflriaeM,ona, et dlPmee1119hClming nocvnwtaAT.wee1 Deetl.apd S 4 is Packet Page -114- OR; 3450 PG: 2576 Exhibit A PARCEL 16 - SIGN ISLAND Island in 17th Ave. North, Block 38, Tier 10, Official Record Book 240, Page 93, TOWN OF NAPLES, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 1, page 8, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 18 A -3 All that part of Lot 9, of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION, lying South ofGoldcn Gate Parkway, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records ofCol ierCounty, Florida. PARCEL 18 C The East 564 feet ofuthc West 1184 feet of Lot 8, of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANYS LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION, less road rightof -way granted in Official Records Book 876, Page 1718, according to the map or plat thereof on file an din the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in the Pyb ' a ,County, Florida. PARCEL 18 D The East 470 feet of West 16 t 8, o O COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 18 E O n r"' All of Lot 8, NAPLES IMPR COMP except the West 1654 feet according to the plat thereof rec Plat Book 2, P ords of Collier County, Florida; the East and West boundary l d Parcel being the West line of said Lot 8 (said West line of Lot 8 lying 25.00 feet North and on line of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier , PARCEL 1B F The East 338.24 feet of the West 958.34 feet of Lot 7, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, per Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, less and except that portion deeded to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida described as: Commence at the Northwest comer of said Lot 7; thence N 89 degrees IT 39" East along the North line of said Lot 7 for a 4istance of 620.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along the North line of said Lot 7 a distance of 41.60 feet to the point of intersection with the point of curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 813.94 feet and a central angle of 26 degrees 13' 03 "; thence continue Southwesterly along said curve an an distance of 51.30 to a point; thence N 00 degrees 39' 49" West 30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 1 of 3 Packet Page -115- OR: 3950 PG: 2577 PARCEL 18 G North 112 of Lot 7, less the West 1288.34 feet, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 - A thru E Lots 3, 4, and 5 of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S IXrME FARMS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; together with all buildings thercon; subject to the following easements of record to Florida Power & Light Company relating to adjacent Lot 6: (a) An easement dated June 10th, 1953, recorded in Deed Book 30 at Page 395 of said Public Records; and (b) An easement dated June 10th 1953, recorded in Deed Book 30 at Page 397 of said Public Records. LESS AND EXCEPT: Part of Lot 3, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier I described line; Commencing at a concrete South, Range 25 East, Collier Court , degrees 26' 09" East 753.94 to a monument on the South line of said described line and the W tt! West 211.15 feet to a concrete t I said described line and the N 729.90 feet to a concrete to the Easterly boundary of Ending of said described Line. r PARCEL 19 F CO'S LITIT.E FARMS, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat -orm , Florida, lying Fasterly and Southerly of the Iollowmg 1/4 comer of Section 27, Township 49 South line of said Section North 89 rxc South 0 d 55" East 334.85 feet to a concrete urd the Point of f the described line; thence along parcel North 0 degrees 21' 55" described Parcel; thence along Nctth 89 degrees 38' 05" East 05" East 13 feet more or less FARMS and the Point of The Westerly % of Lot 39 and Lot and the East 45 feet of Lot 44, t30 and recorded in the vffrce of the Clerk of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. ". O �> SUBDIVISION, Lots 41, 42 and 43 ding to the map or plat thereof on file recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 84, in the Lot 1, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, except area described in Deed Book 22, Page 393, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and less West 25 feet and right -of -way located in Collier County, Florida and except parcel deeded to Collier County Conservancy, Inc. as Parcel 2 in Official Records Book 767, Page 249, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, page 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 G All of Lot 97 of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, lying South of Golden Gate Parkway, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Page 2 of 3 Packet Page -116- OR: 3950 PG: 2576 PARCEL 19 H In North %: of North %: of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, being at the Northwest comer of the section and run East 1398.25 feet; thence South 64 degrees West 1555.06 feet; thence North 664.01 feet to the place of beginning, Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 I Lot 6, NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS SUBDIVISION, less additional road right -of -way for Goodlette -Frank Road, according to the map or plat thereof on file and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. PARCEL 19 J A lot or parcel of land lying m Lot 2 of NAPLES IMPROVEMENT COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS, per plat in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, which lot is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line o t i Dint is the Northwest corner of Lot 50 of GORDON RIVER HOMES per Plat' a is Records of Collier County, Florida, nm Northerly parallel to the West id Lot 2 for thence run Easterly parallel to the South line of said Lot for 180 f e rim Southerly paralli5 line of said Lot for 217.5 feet to South line of said Lot; thence n ong iae f 80 to Point of Beginning. Being the same premises con Page 393, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. th st tjeetj th e t-of- -way for Goodlette -Frank Road. n \ JJ THE FOREGOING LANDS A ATTACHED E ?SIT "A -1" FAwpdwsUkEF 3chm .ct nNPa=l MI DOCUMDM.wpd PARCEL 16) Page 3 of 3 Packet Page METES AND BOUNDS ON FOR ALL FLIISCIavL M TO TPL y ;u OR; 3950 PG; 2579 'x Di[ItlPTUM A p,M of seal. V, T fteelp a 5e.M, Am". 33 E.L C County. f1Pfs@ eaa a Pompon N Let 47, Mepoe Lalp,..ee,.,it Cal Utu. F.lra m n w b, Plot [loot, 2 at Papa 2 N W P.Mea Botmes N Cade, Coy, Ftedde. Mdop n.n pw%PWy oeealw a 111saoa S"in M as tho"M M aMter N IaWM 35. IOWIN p 40 MaO. Ilryo 75 EwL CYr Cwedf, MNfft Vuwe ILW4VWL Men On QwlAw 0) AN up2Ma 3% a A I N 1.74.2S teen eonpa 404'34470. a dlaluea M 1.5".79 fel to Not Msltpapdt aan. of Plaaoa "Pahl M pa.wd In Plat Mw 2lt, M Pop M N Ito odic 1NS+ .d Callr C". AN Owls S�W'Y94 L does 64 nod W N Mt1 MNUn FQK a AMasa of ULII fat. M Ma fad311w loo er. of Lot h N IWIM I kpfanMaal Co's LMk funs s d11sl' h flat look 2 IN Paao 2 of W Peek 0otode N CAW GowM, fko4dp Olaas SmWil"al. Me" Ma seU a" N aawd w 07 a tlbwa N 1.130.10 tot L 'Mst d::aes fMlMloi Od4Ia117 M Aa east- Wl wlw M a W m" dkad of ed Carew ,Iy Ono 1100" eaoa0 WA MW IM 4PMI•PO M 04 aaaee MtaMMd -POW Jr Owsw n00072FT- a -dkUM M 74A3 let e1MOr 1162.7=100 L * el dwmm, N 7UN foot 0.ns. K@3rlrr- o dlNMe of 146.74. Not hest X2r4T2rW. • dlataeea 0 W.M teN; Become MM344YW. • Betawa of 97A0 hat Mae MAS r=X.. a do - , of 42510 hat alola11 MATIOWL, o dMes► M 4OL19 Mt Boost N.11'"TCE. o faaeM N 31113 Not: ll' . MAIS747C, 4,dlale.t N 4111A0 feet Mow M1T1377'E. 4 Belem. N 9510 test slew. M1d'W3r G. a Belww. M dial{ Wt be to kUrMOUM a1w uw South M of CNY. CM Pm Thew teP.I NOW I.aaarb SL 6W4QttrF- S" MM 11000 .IIIM -N -eey foe M COMIM Colo PaI, M a a.tm N •f 37443 fMl b IM Mtero11e0en .10 the E.! se of as Sotdk t11t 1/4 a SoMIM 27, U.wMO 9 5.D, *WW 25 Emq tow SAP14•14'L 141"1 sold Best se, a Bea., S of 2,IQL72 feet to W POMP 6 OEC Md Topow. WBfc A'wee N Leh 1 W.,p1....I N fw" Iwpa..nNM We LMw iw,a . me Paaia .sane N Cdpr Cwwl7. A.We ..V . s Portion N taw 30 aM M Gordon JO~ hve e a OWN ed In Plot Dolt, 2 N Pyo 04 M 0a PO k Arvens ..n porow" deeabed " I.Ibee: de-- ov or Comer G y.e PlaMa odd Peas be" o P•ed of a of aw..IMpMt wave h lafat' eiMNaa4 of 01343 feet 110det 14 a stood '3%E.. OU1S tow Be and MM SaMO dpM.af­v4 Bee, MW4h a :N' 0,73774'. • /OMw aa.o N a a. a"" 11.ee M 0v 111111. of w. Poo .Bea marar3S'.1 feel and IM.bI a MN .aloe a MAl34'a� a1' adPMtaMat. 4wfa.MMM,.a of a P,lpa r..df of V Dee M.tf. ado of 1 120034 leek d vote Ist Boas Mat. O'Pakd C' Gila P Slow, N Dee god" Asp^ wa 0p hot"" sr11r Irons On 4.IrlwrrW. • 41rse N1d01 ft - 0361.0 IM LBe k Paw 29 of W Pw1e dames ae11.leed wee, • dY"Pee N 7 dlaasn. Y 2171! loot M ON a MmOod in Plat Mss 2 Ot POP CC Wr CanMf. pwllo. a Belt. Mw.. r.wsd b Plat MW a" too 11M ilr N law aM .laid -of . W N 140 Mist+ Mare, a dbl.wt M 31640'11.1 ldar fforea; tact xw3sw M. N edd set 4k O a'La to Ib t Moll. .W pee lei rift —ef..w see. a dlabtow N 7471! hem theee f4AQ1d%n aeon N Ned WAMA p photo a toot loam ILWId'W1. Neap Bee 11mt 4Be a .ad BEM N Z7, 34 AND 25, 25 L. .dd ' Plot Dove 2 of Pep. 2 N N. w as N LOW 9 Mwp^ 42 0 N CaMr t.e m* Mrwo. a.bt of 0 d slid a .pee I M pee S d f; sN diet .nee of 13SAO feet W Be fnt.ew. .Ito 0e oero, of evil God Aar I . a letal.. N 334." feet. Prone aeaC b�,eo KOQ3p`2p'W_ W" eow oeet "W. 0" era .eel dpawf� aM, a dwNIM N W on , a mil . N 93"1 Feel- 0 Me MMMoo, M.d11 i. M e.M IIM.'e PIMa a lMwo N SM44 Papa. a Be1aMn N 301.53 lost n IM POINT OF Two a Oft,? a surm. �xnxr "e -2" Packet Page -118- OR: 3950 PG: 2580 FT 4—. 11yY U., 1. Rights of parties in possession of that leased portion of the insured property commonly known as "Jungle Larry's" under unrecorded Lease Agreements and all sublessees thereot including without limitation rights under Memorandum of Lease retarded in O.R. Book 2893, Page 916, Public Records of Collier County, Florids. 2. Ripariansnd littoral rights are not insured (Parcels 19A -E, 19 -L 18 G, 18 E, 18 A -3, 19 G, and 19J). 3. The inalienable right of the public to use the navigable waters covering or adjacent to the lands (Parcels 19A -E, 19 -L 18 G, 18 E, 18 A-3,19 G, and 19H). 4. This policy does not insure water line of the Gordon 19 G, and 19H). lying waterward of the mean -high n 19A -E, 19 -L 18 G, 18 E, 18 A -3 S. Restrictions, condi ' contained on the Plat of Naples as I P `Book 2 Pages} 2, Public Records of Collier 6. Easement in favor, instrument recorded November 14, 195 ge R. Book 246, Page 59, Public Records =of Collier Florida (Parcel 19 A 7. Easement in favor of & W November 14, 1953, Pcge 191), ! ENE S. Easement in favor of Florida Power & Ul November 14, 1953, Deed Book 30, Page 191). in instrument recorded Collier County, Florida (Parcel r, contained in inatrunnot recorded Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 9. Easement in favor of Florida Power & Light Company, contained in instrument recorded Juno 21, 1960, Odd Book 66, Page 301, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 I & Parcel 19 A -E) 10. Easement is favor of Florida Power & Light Company, contained in instrument recorded August 22, 1963„ O.R. Book 244, Page 631, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 A -E). 11. Easement in favor of Collier County, contained in instrument recorded September 12, 1985, O.R. Book 1155, Page 233, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 A -E). 12. Easement in favor of Collier County, containcd in instrument recorded April 29, 1995, OR Book 2053, Page 1696 as corrected & re- recorded at O. R. Book 2098, Page 1826, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 191). Packet Page -119- 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. F OR: 3950 PG: 2581 nt Right of Entry recorded in O.R. Book 2999, Page 3091, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (19 A -E, ISG, 18 E, 191, 18 A -3 & 19 G) Resolution No. 89 -5753 recorded in O.R. Book 1603, Page 1508, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Right-of-Way Deed recorded in O.R. Book 66, Page 432, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 2735, Page 1135, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 19 A -E) Easement in favor of City of Naples, contained in instrument recorded April 1, 1975, O.R. Book 615, Page 1572 as modified at O.R. Book 785, Page 351 & O.R. Book 785, Page 361, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Parcel 18 E). Easement in favor of Donal 1973, O.R. Book 499, Page Is E). Easement in favji Book 783, Page Easement coma Accords of Coll Easement in fav 1978, O.R. Boo Easement contaRecords of Coll 997, Public Easement in favor of Florida Po-*eiA,�Q September 9, 1980, O.R. Book 882, Page (Parcel 79 A -E). instrument recorded January 16, mty, Florida (Parcel 18 C, 18 D, & in ' t 7(Paro November 20, 1976, O.R. I ;t7y I el ] 8 F). ook 227, Page 40, Public nn instrument recorded May 26, ords Col Florida. (Parcel IS F). January 9F5� .R. Book 182, Page 881, Public 3pofiy, contained in instrument recorded Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 24. Any lien provided by County Ordinance or by Ch. 159, F.S., in favor of any city, town, village or port authority, for unpaid service charges for services by any water systems, sower systems or gas systems serving the land desodbed herein; and any lien for waste fees in favor of any county or municipality. 25. Any rights in favor of third parties arising from the following matters of survey as depicted on WilsonMiller survey dated July 6, 2004, revised August 15, 2005, and bearing File No. 4G -125A: 1. Drainage ditch running East and West across Parcel 19F; 2. Guy wire anchors, traffic signal poles, and utility poles located along the Western boundary of the insured property outside of any easement area; and 3. Lift station and related utility equipment located in the Northwestern comer of Parcel 18F outside of any easement area. Packet Page -120- ]a+ �i L' s` a' Y ,3 F 3615747 OR; 4013 PG( 0757 CONSERVATION COLLIER OMVID it O2rICIAL UMIDS of DRUM CORI, n PROPERTY ro s: 207808000D9 d 002681e0009 00/01 /2006 it 00:31M D1101 1. N=, Cilli V =2 2415116.0 Be TA 31.50 W -.11 14601.31 Iota: C011I1 4.01 U14 IIATI I141Im IPIIIOIRCI ARI:CIv1 /RT 1911 WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED is made this 6 J day of l41hec t 2006, by CDC LAND INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, formerly known as COLDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, whose address is 3003 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 400, Naples, FL 34103 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), to COLLIEWCOUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose post office address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida, 34112 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee "). (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives. successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See Attached F,chib' . " herein by reference. 0 Subject to Be G w ons, and ns of record. T IS T E TY. Grantor does not 1 q e< s described herein. TOGETHER with a ; tenements, he nd appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise ap ning.' TO WAVE AND TO HO raver. fF_ CI, AND the Grantor hereby covenants said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except as noted above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. WITNESSES: fLh^ CDC LAND INVESTMENTS, INC., formerly tam known as COLLIER DEVELOPMENT )� YOryL CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation (Printed �.�,N,aam�e))� �J + PATRICK L lii'fER. VIDE PRESIDENT _. �Il1rp1 NL: (Printed Name) THIS CONVEYANCE ACCWM By TM BOARD OF COUNTY C01N1ISSIOKItS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PURSUANT TO AGENDA. DATEDt ITEM NO" fOA Packet Page -121- OR: 4013 PG: 0758 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this � day of 2006 by Patrick L. Utter, Vice President on behalf of CDC Land Investments, Inc., formerly known as Collier Development Corporation, a Florida Corporation, who is personally known to me or vAo has pFWuced (affix notarial seal) w.r� F+`.+.wrrausr P, 4.'" 6 a. &&" (Sig hire of Notary Pubic Ebobft AL Ellfnphom (Print Name of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Serial/Commission #: ! / My Commission Expires: Packet Page -122- OR: 4013 PG: 0759 EXHIBIT "A" Page I of 2 PROPERTY TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 00268160009 THE SOUTHEAST (SE' /4) QUARTER OF NORTHEAST (NE' /. QUARTER AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST (NE' /4) QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE'/) QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF THE CREEK, LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING TWO PARCELS: ALL THAT TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST (NEI /4) QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST BOUNDARY OF STORTER SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF A CANAL, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 106; RUN IN A NORTHERLY D ' :EET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SO GORDON RIVER HOMES SU ON, RECD PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 84• GE_ Ttd AN EAS DIRECTION ALONG Z}ffITI • UND OF GORDON RIVER O 13 T, MORE OR LESS, i E F GORDON RIVER; DIRECTION FOLLO G H.W. LINE OF 00 RIVER TO EXTENSION OF THE RIGHT -OF -W THE CANAL IN STORTE IVISION AS R -, PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 1 RLY DIRECTION ALONG THE EA9 ON OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-'WAY LINE AID CANAL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND Packet Page -123- * *x OR: 4013 PG: 0760 * EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 oft A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE ''h) QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE %) QUARTER, SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT KNOWN AS "POINT OF ENDING OF BULKHEAD LNE NUMBER 3" AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED ON THE BULKHEAD LINE PLAT, RECORDED IN BULKHEAD LINE PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 24, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; RUN SOUTH 89° 42' 36" EAST, ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE NUMBER 3, FOR 217.80 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 290 16' 45" EAST, STILL ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE, FOR 144.56 FEET; THENCE a RUN NORTH 890 42' 36" WEST, FOR 289.14 FEET, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE ' /.) QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE 'G) QUARTER OF SECTION +' 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUT .RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY OF BEMBURY DRIVE BY ION AS M ON THE OROUND *� BEING 362: SOUTH OF THE NO SAI S THEAST (SE '' /Q QU E' .) QUARTER r AS SH 1 ( URVEYOR'S NOTE; F Y LINE OF BEMB E 360 FEET 4 S AID NORTHWE ON PLAT OF STORTER ]VISION AS N PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE I C RECORDS LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA); 7 17' 24" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE FOR 125.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ja CONTAINING 0.732 ACRES; TOGETHER WITH ALL RIPARIAN RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY LAND CONTIGUOUS TO, AND WATERWARD OF, THE HEREIN - DESCRIBED PORTION OF BULKHEAD LINE NUMBER 3. CONSISTING OF 4354 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - AND PROPERTY TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 20760800009 UNPLATTED LANDS LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST AND FURTHER DESCRIBED AS - GOVERNMENT LOT 2 LYING WEST OF THE GORDON RIVER, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 20 ACRES THEREOF AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 800 FEET THEREOF. CONSISTING OF 4.39 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Packet Page -124- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. List Identifying Owner and all Parties of Corporation in (Land Parcel 1) South Portion of Folio No. 61940200006 for Zoo Park Development Node. Owner: Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Fl. 34112 -3969 (Land Parcel 2) East of Gordon River and East Park Development Node. Folio No. 61947800001. Owner: Collier County,3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Fl. 34112 -3969 (Land Parcel 3) South Development Area South of East development Node. Folio No. 00268160009. Owner: Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Fl. 34112 -3969 (')Also see attached deeds submitted as Item 4 to rezone application Project No. 2008- 4004,00 - Ms. Nancy Gundlach, Planner .t - Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -125- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION Cher County AFFIDAVIT 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX 12"39)252 -6358 www.colliergov.net We /1. _ being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/1 am/are the owners of the property described herein and which it the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief Well understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted As property owner We /!further authorize J.P. Marchand P.E. ofKimley -11om and Associates Inc to act as our /my representative in anv matters regarding this Petition. �i�qnaAtu ety Owner rry Typed or Printed Name of Owner Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner �cC /ee.F, j r The foregoing ingrument was acknowledged before me this _VV day of, 200 11 , by Who is rwr�(v IMOWZLtD ma or has pr ced as identification. State of Florida (Signature of Notary Public - State of County of Collier Florida) TONANB" 14, uroOransueAEEOW198 E nM:October 11. 2014 eatloailreausrrpot iuedeeden Revised May 2010 IOK' t vv ke& (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Packet Page -126- 03/10/2008 18:30 FAX GAPA 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. R. ADDRESStNCr 2W NORTH NORSEB101111 DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Please complete the follmong and fax to the Addr"Ain0 DOPSMent at 239- 252.5724 or submit in person to the Address" Department et the above address. Form mug ky °d by Addreaeina personnel or to Ore -aool cation maetirw olaaae allow E dive for orooeasltac. Not all items will apply to every project. Items In bold " are required. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and appal by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (check petition type below, comeWe a separate Addresas,g Chec" Ax each Petition rype) ❑ Bt. (blasting Permit) BD (Boat Doak Extension) Cemivauciraus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) PP (Final Plot ❑ ❑ LtA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Pleas & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ(Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Improvement Pleat) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Memo Change) SNC (Street Name Change — Unptattad) TDR (Transfer of Development Rlghte) VA (Variance) OTHER Removal Permit) an Removal & Site F81 Permit) LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy ofiwig(hy description may be attoohed) 2—'1 — L j-9 Z S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED T SHEETS. N L L.;:- Lo45 3 . c, (o I 9 -1 P-« Parcnt C� 3ck - LA, 9- FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(*) of atwv Mtech to, or assochM wl i. Aagw desorption if more than are) (1) 61940320009 - SHEET 3 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (2) 61940280000 - SHEET 4 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (3) 61947600001 - SHEET 5 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (4) 61940200006 - SHEET 6 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. (5) 00268160009 - SHEET 7 OF 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (act applicable, Nelreedy assigned) REFERENCED PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN THE QUADRANT EAST OF GOODLETTE ROAD AND SOUTH OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, THE ONLY STREET ADDRESS IS FOR PARCEL (4) ABOVE - 1590 GOODLETTE ROAD NORTH. • LOCATION MAP must be attached stowing exact bca8on of projeodstte in natation to newest public roast rig m-d- way Packet Page -127- u1 /iv /:vUB 18:30 FAX BAPA 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. • SURVEY (copy • needed only for ulpkitfed propaAleS) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (OappRcahm) V,hcGA GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARKA COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PROJECT. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 7 FOR SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ALSO, SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 3-7 OF 7 FOR VICINITY MAPS WHICH SERVE AS LOCATION MAPS FOR THE PROPERTIES. PROPOSED STREET NAMES fff appfaable) NOT APPLICABLE. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forex46V PMfisV hCea ady) soPSOP No. is pending.. or AR 0 Page 1 of 2 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST . PAGE TWO Projeot or develapment nartres proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if apploation; indicate whether proposed or existing) GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK, WHICH IS A PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK AND NOT A CONDOMINIUM. Please Check One: ® Chaddist is to be Faxed back [I PenonsyPicked Up APPLICANT NAME: VLADIMIR (VL4D) A. RYZIW, P.E., PMP PHONE 239495-4365 FAX 239 - 495.6517 —� Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and /or Street Name approvef and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY PrlmaryNumber_ Loss Address Number I S 1:6' C> D Address Number 1 !�t� 0b S Address Number f Si5 t] O(a lSgsiQ(o Approved by-,_ K- Date: Updated by. Dote: Packet Page -128- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park Protect Rezone Application Submittal ITEM #11 — UTILITY PROVISIONS STATEMENT I. PUBLIC UTILITIES There are no known existing potable water, sewer, or irrigation lines on the Gordon River Greenway Park property itself. However these utility services will be required for both proposed parking lot/restroom nodes. Potable water, irrigation and sanitary sewer services are provided by the City of Naples (please refer to Appendix A — Potable Water, Irrigation Water, and Sewer Service Availability Letter for the Gordon River Greenway Park Project). The utility record plans provided by the City of Naples utilities staff (please refer to Appendix B - Water and Sewer Mains at Naples Zoo area and at Golden Gate Parkway) depict the following existing potable water, irrigation, and sanitary sewer utilities within the vicinity of the GRGP project site: 1.) An existing 24 -inch potable water main along the western right -of -way line along Goodlette Frank Road, which extends along the north right -of -way line of Lucky Lane, turns to the north to along the Gordon River, and continues to the east along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway . 2.) An existing 20 -inch sanitary sewer force main along the eastern right -of -way line of Goodlette Frank Road which extends along the north right -of -way of Golden Gate Parkway to a sewer pump station at the entrance to Lucky Lane. 3.) An existing 8 -inch sanitary force main along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway. 4.) An existing 36 -inch raw water main along the eastern right -of -way line of Goodlette Frank Road which extends along the north right -of -way of Golden Gate Parkway and Lucky Lane. This line runs alongside the potable water main described above. The following utility improvements, as shown in the 30% site plans (ITEM # 17 -SITE PLANS) are proposed for each of the parking lot/rest room nodes: 1.) Zoo Parking Node - One 6" potable /fire line with 1 fire hydrant, and one 6" sanitary sewer lateral, grinder pump station and 2" force main. The potable /fire line will connect to the proposed water line for the site access road to be designed by others, and the sanitary sewer force main will tie into Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 - Nancy Gundlach, Planner .1. Gordon Fiver Greenway Park Packet Page -129- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. the existing 20 -inch sanitary sewer force main along the eastern right -of -way line of Goodlette Frank Road. 2.) Northeast Development Node - One 6" potable /fire line with 1 fire hydrant, and one 6" sanitary sewer lateral, grinder pump station and 2" force main. The services for both of these utilities will connect at Golden Gate Parkway. Please refer to ITEM #17 — SITE PLANS for additional detail of the utility design. Please note that these plans and the proposed design features described above are at the 30% design phase. II. PRIVATE UTILITIES Electrical service is provided by Florida Power & Light, which has an existing overhead power line along the south right -of -way of Golden Gate Parkway. As depicted in ITEM #12 — SURVEY for the subject Project, there are 2 FPL easements on the project parcel at located at each of the westernmost parking nodes off of Goodlette Frank Road. Construction of the GRGP project will require extension of the forgoing utilities onto the site parcel. The increased demand for utilities as a result of the GRGP project should have a negligible long term adverse impact on the regional public and private utilities infrastructure. III. APPENDIX A. Potable Water, Irrigation Water, and Sewer Service Availability Letter for the Gordon River Greenway Park Project B. Water and Sewer Mains at Naples Zoo area Project No. 2008 - 4004.00 — Nancy Gundlach, Planner -2- Gordon River Greenway Park Packet Page -130- 7/26/2011 Item B.A. Appendix A Potable Water, Irrigation Water, and Sewer Service Availability Letter for the Gordon River Greenway Park Project Project No. 2008- 4004.00 — Nancy Gundlach, Planner .3- Gordon River Greenvray Park Packet Page -131- UTILITIES TELEPHONE(239)213 -4712 . FACSIMILE (239) 213 -4799 380 RIVERSIDE CIRCLE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 -6796 February 23, 2010 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. GRAEF Attn: Ms. Irene Nath, P.E. 27200 Riverview Center Blvd, Ste. 101 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Tel: 239 495 4368 /Fax: 495 5517 Subject: Potable Water, Irrigation Water, and Sewer Service Availability Letter for the Gordon River Greenway Park Project on Golden Gate Parkway City Utility Review File #09 -06 Dear Ms. Nath: In response to your email with plans received 2/22/10, this office has reviewed the subject site location (attached) for potable water, reclaimed water, and sewer service. This letter attests that the subject property is located within the City of Naples potable water service area, City reclaimed service area, and the City of Naples sewer service area. The County, as part of their Gordon River Greenway Park Access Way Project, plans on extending potable, reclaimed and sewer lines about 750 feet east of Goodlette- Frank Road along a new County access road that goes east -west just south of the Hess Gas Station at the comer of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The subject project might be able to hook up to those access way project stubouts if those stubouts have been constructed. Allocation of available utility capacity for potable, reclaimed, and sewer service will be assured when future developmentiredevelopment of the property has received final City approval of the engineering design plans for potable water, reclaimed water, and sewer service, and all required fees and charges have been paid. However, this letter does not imply or guarantee that adequate water distribution, reclaimed water distribution, or sewer facilities of sufficient size and capacity exist immediately adjacent to or in the vicinity of the subject project. Water main extensions, force main extensions, and /or related utility system upgrades to provide adequate capacity for development of the property may become necessary at the cost responsibility of the developer. In considering the foregoing should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call this office at telephone 213 -4762 or email pkwa @naplesgov.com. Packet Page -132- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Sincerely Paul Kwa, P.E. Utility Engineer Packet Page -133- Paul Kwa From: Math, Irene D. (rere.not iiftraefusa.coesj Sent Monday. February 22, 20tO 5 46 PM To Michael Lam Cc: Paul Kwa Subject: RE'. Gordon River GreemveY Park Attwchamnni EXHIBIT A -2 -12-09 LOA.pdF C_Ot C3.0 pswrall- sM- dev_00,1, Of Hello Michael and Paul, Would either of you be able to provide a revised idth el W utility oyallatllley for wa[eq sewer, and Irrigation which will include the relocated east development node? Please see the attached overall site plan for further detail. The east development node has been relocated to the north afthe project property, adjacent to Gnitlen Gate Parkway. Feel free to contact me with any questions you may have Thanks so much for your help. Regard , Irene "be Nath, P.E. nJlan Maala. GRAEF In. 9lKMn. Onto w. 10 Ij sndlaa, {13113 <453r ]39 /aaY3ru ut,. 1391495... 339/495ss M1v I — tan',and —anm .,odd use .con GME' x to b+e-1 of-1th uss. na. ♦nh. 1ni-1 atbawnenu ture mn't"'Mtln' k,m.l a, ran, aNV e, I,neMM ne,nd 1, Il In, ✓e nw lne lnlen. retlpentNiM1Y tlNE.3JJareapWeC bGkM ✓4P<[wNn4atlrY �n..n.lmeay, mJ nMlH in' man rest V1eae egnlMr e..rvlronmanl Wbn P,Mdina Ml[ " Frain: Michael Iam Imaum:mlamGreplesgov.comj Strait Wednesday, FeWary 17, 201011:32 AM To: NaM, Irene D. C ; Paul Kwa; George Archibald; Rick Maddock; Adam Rivera Subject: RE: Gordon River Grearway Park Hi Irene. There Is B' newer force main along Golden Gate Parkway. For mad dands, dense cunnd our sewer lines lowly Rick Matlock at 239- 325-7030oe1t. Thanks, Michael Lam 2/23/2010 Packet Page -134- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Pagel of 5 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 2 of 5 From: Noth, Irene D. Imalmrirme.naM�graef- usa.mn] Sane Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:16 AM To: Michael Lam Subject: RE: Screw River Greeraray Palk - 1lello Michaci, You sent me the map below a The over a year ago. Since that time, one of our developmerst nodes has been relocated to the north portion of our she along Golden Gate Parkway, is there a City, sanitary sewer or force main located within GGPKY? Thanks for your assistance with this. Regards, Irene Irma NaM, P.E. P,gee aM^,.+ wueF .. tar .. amro,, a l3'/ ea ihd W- .a/wsaaase.. a. /aas ssvn, w<z..,.uG m•� w..aam W Ww.8 r2Ef -ut2 Cnm. .� IiV.EF a me,na. n.me elc,wbVSq me 2/23/2010 Packet Page -135- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 3 of 5 Thnenulena env ane,An�env n..r miun wiAtlemi+i inlame,en lobe wetl unN XYrM inMMN emv+ntl +l. Xw m name nviM,eepivnaq inxreY, +av re vaned basrgeN tlw mmxi, lelnegemMllmoege,nX natlh eM wMinel nn0ar, PMwe oorgkLr IM envlronimntt More pnntinP IM1b pa{p. F m: Michael Lam [mallhxmlamCCrwpi w ,corn] S V Wednesday, Janwry 21, 2009 10:25 AM To: Nath, here D. Subject: FW: Gomon RNer Grer,mW Park Irene, The map Is ancbsetl. Thanks, From: Nate, Imm D. jmailto:irere,n MVgraet-u .Wml Sent Weone•A2y, January 21, 2009 10:16 AM To: Michael lam Subje@: FW: G.N R,er G,,nway Park Imrw Nath, E.I. GRAEF 27200 RNerview Center Boulevard Sure 101 Bonaa Sprerr,v FL 34135 >317 23914954360 2391495 4368 Evert 2391537 4630 mobile 2/23/2010 Packet Page -136- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 4 of 5 2391495 5517 fax glaefaaa.dom GRAEF is We new obsesses name of Graef -USA Inc Ths firm was established in 1961 as Gfaef Anhah S.Woemer & Assoca ms. Iris. TMs small and any myst ems may contain wrtfelelalal informalnn to De used only by the Mounted mcm enl(s). It you are M the Ireentat reopkint of this emall, you are expected to disregard me mReM, delete the email message, and not'dy the original warder. Ple®e Onside, The environment Lefoxe p�stung Mz page. Fan: Michael Lam [mailbimrA m@naplescm.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2006 3:19 PM T¢ Math, Irene D. Subjee4 RE: Gordon R1ver Graenway Park Hl Irene, The map won the water and sewer moire is enclosed wJim this small Thanks. Michael lam Utility Pena Coordinator Prime: 239 -21 &6051 From: NAM, Irene D. (me1lbl:1rene.NaM@GAS41ocmj Sent: Monday, May 05, 2WB 10:13 AM To: Mktwl lam Subject: PW: Gordon River Gna meay Park Held mlw.a, Would you W able to assist with any of the Information I repuestatl m the a-mall below] Please feel Meek to contact me ti you have any ouestlons or concems. Thank you for your help, hens esns alaME 1. Greet Antelt Scitloamer B Associates, Inc. 27200 Riverview Center Blvd, State 101 Bonita Springs. Florida 341344317 (239)4954360 (239) 496x368 eyed) (239) 495-5517(fax) (239) 537400 (call) hene.natn�eesei coon www.aasei.mm ExTerl Filename not kpecified. From: Nash, Irene D. Sent Thursday, May 01, 2006 5:23 PM To: Paul Kwa' Car Rymv, Veto A. Subject: FW: Gordon Romer Gre nway Park Hello Paul We are st Me paludrery planning Mg. or IM subjed mlest (please rater to attached location map- the protest parcel s witne l M Orange) and I wantetl m "We. 6 the wife is servicetl by City of Naples Utilillws. W Wd a nd possible m gat a map boon yes of the ulaitds avatiabb.tine bath (ioodel Frank Rowel end Gdden Gate Parkway? Arty Mlonrolien you can orevde would be greatly appretlmad. Thank you, Irene haaeho E/. Great Anhall Schloemer 8 Associates, Im. 27200 Rivmvkrw Center Blvd, Suite tot Bm1la Sprkgs. Flada MIN4317 (239) 495 <360 (239) 4954368(Eaad) (239) 495 -5517 (fax) (239) 5374630 total) .nMa nudi(doasa com w ,Qiksal.wm 2/23/2010 Packet Page -137- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Page 5 of 5 Errors Rename not speeified. 2/23/2010 Packet Page -138- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Appendix B Water and Sewer Mains at Naples Zoo area Water and Sewer Mains at Golden Gate Parkway area Packet Page -139- V i L u N Cr r Q+ W •V un ad �I •�q r Ly y ad C w _I - L a - C 11A I S Packet Page -140- J r U 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. L N 3 �.i Y v v L 1+ il J u U, V: '.L ti J I =5� 6 emu 4� 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. +rtes• GI D, 4. m jji p; ms m v� +sz GLDEN GATE :PI WG -.- • — — 12 4' Dtl Ue"6 ler1AanfBM l e i 6 � - pI,', / ', 36' �3.v'N3IB M1lam(Graenj i pwy� Seiner fo-ce M a 1(Dran3e) J � 1 • -. .� r 134 1 I i] EY�y 121 i f m tBfi'1H! it /om �i gOAT�R'_ Packet Page -141- FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Ms. Melissa Hennig Collier County Facilities Management 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building W Naples, Florida 34112 7/26/2011 Item B.A. RECEIVED AUG 2 B 2008 FACILMES CONSEPNAiION r0l.1-1EP August 25, 2008 Re: DHR Project File No.: 2008 -04974 / Received by DHR: August 6, 2008 A Phase 11 Archaeological Assessment of 8CR1063, Gordon River Greenway Parcel, Collier County, Florida Dear Ms. Hennig: Our office received and reviewed the above referenced survey report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373 of the Florida Statutes, for possible adverse impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). In December 2007, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted an archaeological and historical Phase II assessment Site 8CR1063 on behalf of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. ABC placed seven 1 xl meter excavation units within Site 8CR1063 in order to refine the site's chronology, determine if it has significant associations with Henry Nehrling, and to assess its eligibility for listing on the NRHP. After analysis of the recovered artifacts, AHC determined that Site 8CR1063 is a historic refuse site dating to the 1940's and 1950's. Because the site is too late to be associated with Henry Nehrling and lacks features, cultural strata, or research potential, AHC determined that 8CR1063 does not appear to be eligible for listing on the NRHP. ABC recommends no further investigation of the site. Based on the information provided, our office concurs with these determinations and finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance with Chapter 1 A-46, Florida Administrative Code. However, please forward an original print of the report to our office so that we can submit the report to the Florida Master Site File. For any questions concerning our comments, please contact April Westerman, Historic Preservationist, by electronic mail at amwestermanna dos.state.fl.us, or by phone at (850) 245- 6333. We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties. Sincerely, Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and State Historic Preservation Officer 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 • http: / /www.nheritage.com ❑ Director's Office O Archaeological Research ® Historic Preservation (850) 245 -6300 • FAX: 245-6436 (850) 2456444 • FAX: 245 -6452 (850) 245 -6333 • FAX: 245 -6437 Packet Page -142- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 3301 Fact Tamiarni Trail • Building W • Naples, Florida 34112 • (239) 774.8380 • Fax (239) 793 -3795 July 30, 2008 April Westerman Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources Historic Preservation 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 RE: DHR Project File Number: 2008 -2572 Project Name: Gordon River Greenway Park Location: T49S, R25E, Sections 27 & 34, Collier County Dear Ms. Westerman: Please find enclosed paper copies of the Gordon River Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment and the Gordon River 8CR1063 Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment that were completed by Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) in August 2007 and December 2007 respectively. I was unaware that this Phase 1I existed until recently. AHC had been contracted by another department within Collier County. Because the Greenway Park is still in the design phase, I cannot yet provide you with a set of plans showing the exact location of the development activities. Please advise me if any other precautions must be taken prior to development of the Greenway Park. Sincerely.— Ae is'sa �� Hennig Principal Environmental Specialist - Conservation Collier Program Collier County Facilities Department 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL 34112 phone: 239-252-2957 fax: 239-252-6720 e -mail: melissahennig(iacolliereov.net Enclosures (2) c r r c _ Packet Page -143- FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State DIVISION OF Hb-r6R1CAL RESOURCES Ms. Melissa Hennig Collier County Facilities Management 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building W Naples, Florida 34112 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. August 22, 2008 Re: DHR Project File No.: 2008 -04054 Received by DHR: July 18, 2008 A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment, Gordon River Greenway Preserve Parcel, Collier County, Florida Dear Ms. Hennig: Our office received and reviewed the above referenced survey report in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373 of the Florida Statutes, for possible adverse impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Between April and July 2007, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted an archaeological and historical Phase 1 survey of the proposed Gordon River Greenway Park on behalf of the Collier County Parks Administration. AHC identified two previously unrecorded archaeological sites (8CR978 and 8CR1063) within the project area during the investigation. ABC determined that Site 8CR978, a prehistoric shell refuse site, consists of redeposited remains; the total loss of integrity renders the site ineligible for listing on the NRHP. ABC recommends no further investigation of Site SCR978. AHC identified historic scatter site (8CR1063) within the project area during the investigation that may be associated with pioneer horticulturalist, Henry Nettling. AHC recommends additional investigation in order to determine the site's eligibility for listing on the NRHP. Based on the information provided, our office concurs with these determinations and finds the submitted report complete and sufficient in accordance with Chapter 1 A-46, Florida Administrative Code. 500 5. Bronoegh Street • Tattthawee, FL 323944250 • hupJ /w+vwJlherkage.com O Dimdw'e office O Atli Iogicd It"cank 0 Hionric -Pre aHm (850) 245 -6300 FAX: 245-6M WO) 2454W •. FAX: 245-6452 (850) umm - FAX: 245-W7 Packet Page -144- _ 72z@2]! Item &* § 22 / §72 - ƒ / \ } / E #C %7 ¥ \ \ k \ )ƒ \ <0 a \\= 27 � C)\ g ;) ƒ � ( #a \ £C2 \O � \ � / . QQ / §(/ / ¢/\ \ \�ƒ Tl0 aR= 0 $} (/$ / Packet Page -I54- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 3301 Fast Tanvami Trail • Building W • Naples. Florida 34112 • (239) 7748380 • Fax (239) 793 -3795 July 15. 2008 April Westerman Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources Historic Preservation 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 RE: DHR Project File Number: 2008 -2572 Project Name: Gordon River Greenway Park Location: T49S. R25E, Sections 27 & 34_ Collier County Dear Ms. Westerman: Please find enclosed a CD containing the Gordon River Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment that was completed for the Gordon River Greenway Park by Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) in August 2007. Because the Park is still in the design phase. I cannot Yet provide you with a set of plans showing the exact location of' the development activities. Please advise whether a Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment will be required over the entire Park. only in the areas that will be developed. or onh in the areas recommended by AHC. Sinceplyt 1G4e\hssa Hennig' Cl Principal Environmental Specialist - Conservation Collier Program Collier County Facilities Department 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples. FL 34112 phone: 239-252-2957 fax: 239 -252 -6720 e- mail: melissahennic'n colliergo� net Enclosure (1) C__ o_ _A.0 r QOZT c Packet Page -146- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. UDILME FRANK R AD C.R� / Nil �A 9A 9�'�'F F+ Y' LE 5 m e' mg +a S � 3 1a 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. UDILME FRANK R AD C.R� / Nil I 3 d df 6q a ¢P #a. s�� � 9 N d. 4 Z i• ie��— •w � „3 xv r a ¢IIP I F t'F x v o mG0 • it r tkdla0 afit 9 $ Si A Y� Y P I v9 4 I Lfi'vP � �Ay¢ e yP P' e 9 A zfy, eadd! ; � i3 x� a Fg3asP A 3 k a i3 QPY A ;I� z g} x °c al4�O�f0 c�y�P� i $e q � y E {vgp '7E drr 3 t' o � t s a i z 91 I_� 5 �' § � Ez:z° s • g I, 6,5d g i Std -I 3 �e�l a� I $..y '+aap.§' }� e° a �•r $ F SSA 3 i zn.. drs EF Y _P aay- P sfe s a? a a dal Ad SPs� ay 3� E A¢ adifpil vvdr �a Mfr xr� f r a 3 rA SER § a s P v PF dir kf .e 147' �A 9A Y' LE � 1a I 3 d df 6q a ¢P #a. s�� � 9 N d. 4 Z i• ie��— •w � „3 xv r a ¢IIP I F t'F x v o mG0 • it r tkdla0 afit 9 $ Si A Y� Y P I v9 4 I Lfi'vP � �Ay¢ e yP P' e 9 A zfy, eadd! ; � i3 x� a Fg3asP A 3 k a i3 QPY A ;I� z g} x °c al4�O�f0 c�y�P� i $e q � y E {vgp '7E drr 3 t' o � t s a i z 91 I_� 5 �' § � Ez:z° s • g I, 6,5d g i Std -I 3 �e�l a� I $..y '+aap.§' }� e° a �•r $ F SSA 3 i zn.. drs EF Y _P aay- P sfe s a? a a dal Ad SPs� ay 3� E A¢ adifpil vvdr �a Mfr xr� f r a 3 rA SER § a s P v PF dir kf .e 147' I ' .,t S6S M.S�o4V0� 11 �A 1 - 4 @. l —1 JI i I f 'I A ww6 a li .0 7 I; �i qk L +IXWI 4 Fb 3 3 I I a �r 1 0i 1 Packet Page -148- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 31 �p asEA. li gg x -g I i 1 i b I I I q a H2A ��IN 1 0 e i{& y 8i F N; AAug #� §gSG Akk�BA h.R s N R AF�`{p wi}. �j9Rs �IR Rix Fj�9Si gaE '#3�aR'�cii�`s �F�y eY� { } N- 0 rzj I a 3 f 10'177- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. ffff 11 y III I, f i Ipa� Lill 1: II ;i # s 1 I "pq� 189 A l5f I � it I I . � a a f d II 1 / i }} IF _. I iY ay � :4s �9 31 �p asEA. li gg x -g I i 1 i b I I I q a H2A ��IN 1 0 e i{& y 8i F N; AAug #� §gSG Akk�BA h.R s N R AF�`{p wi}. �j9Rs �IR Rix Fj�9Si gaE '#3�aR'�cii�`s �F�y eY� { } N- 0 rzj I a 3 f 10'177- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. ffff 11 y III I, f i Ipa� Lill 1: II ;i # s 1 I "pq� 189 A l5f I � it I I . � a a f d II 1 / / 1 l� % /Y< i �I I � N f I f s $iA 4 a ffr fig:. ,i :ga ss� f 4y$y Nh¢ 4 gg ;� d7�af k2 ;Q1 Ri "9pS sa11 1 /4I�- of Ig;T Mad 9° a 48T KIN, aRep d.4 t+k'i AR N£ Rv AjxpA #a Packet Page -149- f-� �s4 RY f^ _ d$ 4 y13F 3e 2e" PS5LiFg9e 51S$i1111 Nil i s a 3F g 3 1� 3 R GA 9 p R a 3 B4 1F i -c'6F 3E .. r x -�= 41L„ +` 1- �'lin r - M'� e _ r � r • } i .ry qy a k PIK T. r lot mt- f . 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park Project Rezone Application Submittal March 2011 ITEM #2 — PROJECT NARRATIVE The Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) site parcel approximates 123.6 acres and is located at the southeast quadrant of the Goodlette -Frank Road /Golden Gate Parkway intersection within the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Site improvements and attendant infrastructure for public use are proposed for the GRGP site to create water quality systems and passive recreation amenities within an ecological trail corridor. Although the proposed GRGP improvements are planned to be designed and constructed as a single project undertaking, for purposes of geographical identification and background information, the project is divided into two sub- projects "A" and "B ": Project "A" is owned by Collier County and is generally bounded on the north by Golden Gate Parkway and a vacant residential multi - family parcel owned by Caribbean Ventures LLC; to the east by a currently vacant residential parcel owned by Caribbean Ventures LLC, by the Bear's Paw Country Club and by the Golden Gate Canal; to the west by the Naples Zoo, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, the Gordon River and a vacant residential parcel; and, to the south by Project "B" (a vacant conservation parcel owned by Conservation Collier). Project "B" is bounded on the north by Project "A "; to the east by the Golden Gate Canal and the Naples Airport; to the west by the Gordon River, a vacant residential parcel, a vacant non - agricultural parcel and Goodlette Arms, LLC; and, to the south by the Gordon River and The Commons Professional Park. The subject property is currently zoned A (Agricultural), CON (Conservation), C -3 (Commercial Intermediate) and RMF -6 (Residential Multifamily 6). The property also has ST/W A designations and an ST (Special Treatment) Overlay district designation. The rezoning request is to change the property to the P (Public Use) designation for use as a public park but to allow the lands with the ST/1N1 -4 and ST Overlay designations to remain. A companion request for an ST Permit has been made in conjunction with the rezoning request. Rezoning the property to the P designation for the stated purpose of use as a public park will enhance the value and benefit of the property to the general public and will include designation of specific environmental preservation areas to benefit the environment. Packet Page -151- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A To provide a brief history of the property, the site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C -3 (Commercial Intermediate), A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 82 -2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. It is important to understand that a conventional rezoning request is being pursued rather than a rezoning to a PUD (Planned Unit Development). This is a result of a grant that has been received from the Trust for Public Land, which required that the property not have the flexibility that is sometimes associated with a PUD designation. Therefore, the decision was made to apply for a conventional rezoning to P with limited uses in order to comply with grant requirements.The proposed (GRGP) project is the second in a series of Collier County projects designed to create the Gordon River Greenway, a unique passive park along with a water quality system to mitigate and reduce pollution levels in Gordon River and downstream surface waters that flow into Naples Bay, within the Naples - Collier urban area. The GRGP site is being designed to result in two distinct park development nodes: A Zoo Development Node to the south with ingress /egress provisions through a loop roadway originating at the Fleischmann Boulevard /Goodlette -Frank Road intersection, and a Northeast Development Node to the northeast with ingresslegress provisions through a future north /south access roadway adjacent to the Bear's Paw golf course. It is noted that the design, permitting and construction of these access roadways to serve the two park development nodes is not part of the GRGP project scope herein. Collier County will be providing access to the two development nodes pursuant to several developer contribution agreements. Primary components of the GRGP project are generally depicted on the overall site concept plan which accompanies this rezone application and are expected to include: o Stonmwater dry detention treatment areas and bio- retention swales o Water control structures o Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian walkways, pavilions and boardwalks c Fishing platform • Parking, including shared parking, facilities • Designated environmental preserve areas o Restroom facilities Packet Page -152- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. • Pedestrian bridges • Connection points to access roadways by others • Park maintenance building • Canoe /kayak launch facility at the Gordon River o Gopher Tortoise Preserve • Site landscaping • Best management improvements to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. Packet Page -153- �\ \\ \\ .� � T I L- - - -- -- !! \( |) \!§ I [ ); — ) I . : - }�\ . II ,� ■ Psi » . 5, $ �\ \\ \\ .� � T I L- - - -- -- Packet Page -154 - 22ao4 Item e *. § � ! / !! % \( [ ); j I ) I . )\ ; I » I i .... z >�e�P • � \ } # \(` Packet Page -154 - 22ao4 Item e *. § � ! / !! % \( [ ); j I ) I . )\ ; § \� \ � } � } � ) 2262011 Item 8.A. HIM— N /: ) : \ % Mz 0 0 M 0 z 77, S", v, \j (0 MEMO w 0 1 ! ° °�i§\ z z ) § /{! Packet Page -155- Packet Page - 156 -- — 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. A D v S n N n rrDi NORTH z 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 Item VI.A. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT I. II. III. MEETING OF MAY 4.2011 NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT Petition No.: PL 2009 -25 Rezone and PL 2011 -677 ST Permit companion item Petition Name: Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone and ST Permit companion item Applicant/Developer: Collier County Public Services Division, Parks and Recreation Department Engineering Consultant: Kimley Horn and Assoc, J.P. Marchand Environmental Consultant: Entrix, Inc., Raymond Loraine LOCATION The 123.6 + /- acre subject property is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) and south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR -886), in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES W S- E- UAW ZONING A, C -3 Golden Gate Parkway then Freedom Park, Caribbean Gardens Zoo.. office park C -3, CON, City of Naples Zoning District: PD A, PUD, City of Naples Zoning District PD and C4 A, COIF, RSF -4, RMF -6, RMF -16, City of Naples Zoning Districts: Packet Page -157- office buildings, the Conservancy of SW Florida Bear's Paw Golf and Country Club, single- family, multi - familv development, airport vacant, undeveloped land, offices, single - Family, Conservancy of SW Florida, Car- ribean Gardens Zoo Page 1 of 11 IV. t_ W O N Q0 N Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4. 2011 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The request is to Rezone several properties totaling 123.6± acres from Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) a with an ST Overlay. Commercial Intermediate (C -S), and Residential Multi- farnil District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with an ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a public park with an ST Overlay to be known as the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP). A companion ST Permit request has been made in conjunction with the rezoning request in order to impact areas within the ST overla'J. The main parcel is bordered to the north by Golden Gate Parkway, to the south and west by the Gordon River and to the east by Bear's Paw Golf Course. The Naples Airport borders the southeastern most parcel and the two (2) westernmost parcels are bordered to the west by Goodlette Frank Road and to the east by the Gordon River. The Gordon River is a Class III water body that is listed as impaired by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection due to its low dissolved oxygen concentration. Additionally, the Golden (late Canal, a major drainage canal that terminates at Naples Bay. enters the Gordon River along the eastern boundary of the largest parcel. The Collier County Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) site improvements and related infrastructure for public use are proposed to create water quality systems and passive recreation amenities within an ecological trail corridor. The proposed GRGP project is designed to create a unique passive park along with a water quality system to mitigate and reduce pollution levels in Gordon River and downstream surface waters that flow into Naples Bay, within the Naples - Collier urban area. Primary components of the GRGP project are depicted on the overall site concept plan (Exhibit 7 of EIS) are expected to include: • Storm water dry detention treatment areas and bio- retention swales • Water control structures • Passive park amenities such as recreational meandering pedestrian walkways, pavilions and boardwalks • Fishing platform • Parking. including shared parking facilities • Designated environmental preserve areas • Resiroom facilities • Pedestrian bridges • Connection points to access roadways by others • Park maintenance building • Canoe /kavak launch facilirv_ at the Gordon River • Gopher Tortoise Preserve • Site landscaping • Best management improvements to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. Page 2 of 11 Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4, 2011 7/26/2011 Item B.A. V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY A. Future Land Use Element The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area. This designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non - residential uses, including parks, recreational facilities, and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC). The Public Use District (P) is intended to accommodate government facilities that provide essential services, including parks and recreational services facilities. Furthermore, the proposed use is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) via Policy 5.5, which encourages the planning for expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands that are designated for urban intensity uses. The P District is also intended for additional uses such as administrative services facilities, not for profit child care facilities, collections and transfer sites for resource recovery, communication towers, educational facilities, educational plants, essential public service facilities, fairgrounds, libraries, museums, parking facilities, safety services facilities, and other comparable uses. B. Conservation & Coastal Manalrement Element Objective 2.2 All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet applicable Federal. State, or local water quality standards. Policy 2.2.2 In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of storm water run -off, storm water systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt should be made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality offresh water to the estuarine system. Non - structural methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged. The Gordon River Greenway Park design will meet all federal, State, and local water quality design standards; issuance of the ERP from the SFWMD will confirm this assertion. In addition. as required by the Florida Communities Trust grant, water quality will be improved within the currently impaired Gordon River by the onsite treatment of offske runoff from Golden Gate Parkway as discussed in Subsection f.i. (EIS, p. 15). The storm water runoff will be conveyed through a storm water treatment unit to separate solids, grease and oils. The storm water will then be conveyed through a pipe and released into a spreader swale enhancing the timing, quantity and quality of the storm water to the estuarine system. Objective GI The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective measureable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for the portion of the Page 3 of 11 Packet Page -159- Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4, 2011 Count- which is ident�fied on the Countywide Future Land use Map (FL UM) as Rural Lands Stewardship Overlay. Policy 6. 1.1 For the County's Urban Designated Area. Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District, Rural - Industrial District and Rural- Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM. native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (_4CSCJ where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC Q requirements, this polio- shall apply to all non - agricultural development except for single - family ao dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed E management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. The Gordon River Greenway Park contains approximately 112.9 acres of native habitat of which 0 CN4 some 103.3 acres (approximately 91.600) will not be impacted and 222 acres (19.7 %) will be Nplaced in a Preserve. The preservation area exceeds the 15% native habitat requirement (16.92 acres) and includes most of the upland gopher tortoise habitat within the project. Policv 6.1.4 Prohibited invasive exotic vegetation shall be removed from all new developments. Nuisance and exotic species of plants, particularly Brazilian pepper, Melaleuca. Australian pine, and Downy rose myrtle are required to be removed from the entire site during final site inspections. Policv 6.1. The County shall require native vegetation to be incorporated into landscape designs in order to promote the preservation of native plant communities and to encourage water conservation. The Gordon River Greenway Park has been designed to showcase the native vegetation of Collier County. Native vegetation will be incorporated into supplemental landscape designs. Objective 6.2 The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6 Ae following policies provide criteria to make this objective measureable. The Countv's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element. The design of the Gordon River Greenway Park meets or exceeds all the applicable Policies within this Objective. Approximately 91.6% of the native wetland and upland habitats onsite will not be developed. In addition, one of the major components of the project will include environmental education. Objective 7.1 The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. The County relies on the listingprocess of State and Federal agencies to identifi species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed annual species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Pace 4 of 11 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A- 27.003, 68A - 27.004, and 68A - 27.005, FAC and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in50CFR17. The only listed animal species observed onsite by the environmental consultant was the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). The consultant identified 316 burrows. County staff worked with the applicant to develop a site plan to minimize impacts to the gopher tortoise and to maximize preservation of the existing gopher tortoise habitat. Permitting for gopher tortoise relocation adjacent to the zoo property is required and proposed to be done prior to any site work. The removal and maintenance of nuisance and exotic plant species, specifically downy rose myrtle, will improve the habitat of this species. Objective 10.1 Priorities for shoreline land use shall be given to water dependent uses over water related land uses and shall be based on type of water - dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR- SP-93-01) Mav 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number of wet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan's marina siting criteria. In accordance with Policies 10.0.0 and 10.1.4, the proposed canoe/kayak launch will be public, prohibit motorized boats, and will impact only 0.21 acres of disturbed mixed forested wetlands. Objective 10.2 The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with its program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10 2.3 and 10.2.4. Objective 12.2 The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re- building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; (Criterion met. The proposed project is consistent with the aforementioned Objective, as well as Policies 10.23 and 10.2.4. Additionally, the applicant sustains that the proposed habitable structures will be built at a minimum finished floor elevation of 7 feet, which is the minimum elevation required for the subject property, by the current FEMA Flood Zone Base Flood Elevation (AE7) map.) b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation, (Criterion met. The proposed project site retains existing wetlands and proposes opens space that will serve as a wildfire protective zone. In this regard, these Page 5 of 11 Packet Page -161- t. N 0 (N N ti Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 14th e. f. strategies are consistent with those included in the "Wildfire Mitigation In Florida Land Use Planning Strategies and Best Management Practices" published by the Florida Department of Community Affairs.) installation of on -site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; (Criterion not applicable. The applicant sustains that emergency power generators are not necessary for the proposed park structures. Staff is of the opinion that this criterion is not applicable because the proposed structures will not serve as public emergency shelters.) beach and dune restoration, re- nourishment, or emergenel protective actions to minimize the loss ofstructures from future events: (Criterion met. The applicant sustains that this criterion is not applicable. However, staff is of the opinion that "protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events" is a criterion that must be addressed. In this regard, the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code include requirements that address this criterion.) emergency- road repairs: (Criterion met. The applicant notes that the proposed project minimizes the amount of road construction through the use of shared access points and parking areas.) repair and/or replacement of publicJv owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls, etc. (Criterion met. The applicant states that publicly owned facilities will be designed to industry and County standards to minimize maintenance and repair needs.) VI. MAJOR ISSUES A. Stormwater Management Storm water management for the Gordon River Greenway Park (GRGP) will consist of two (2) separate systems. Both the Zoo Parking Node and the Northeast Parking Node use typical catch basins and pipe to collect runoff from the parking areas and convey it to dry detention pre - treatment areas before discharging through control structures with bubble -up outfalls into wetlands. The receiving body for the outfalls is the Gordon River. The Northeast Parking Node also proposes to provide storm water discharge conveyance for a portion of Golden Gate Parkway after passing the road runoff through a commercially distributed storm water treatment chamber. Storm water will not be directed into the Upland Preserve. Storm water management concerns will be reviewed at time of Site Development Plan submittal and will be required to meet the LDC. This project will be permitted by South Florida Water Management District. B. Environmental 1. Site Description and Proiect Description: Environmental Requirements The main parcel contains wetlands along the Gordon River Greenway corridor and uplands with Gopher Tortoise in the central eastem portion of the property. The western half Zoo Parking node has been highh, impacted as it has been part of the Zoo parking area. See the Listed Page 6 of 11 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report - May 4, 2011 Species Map (Exhibit 15 of EIS) for a comprehensive look at the wetlands, uplands, and listed species on the property. The site will be enhanced through water quality improvements, wetland enhancement, nuisance /exotic species removal, and proper land management activities. See Exhibit 8 of the EIS for impacts to the entire site. 2. Wetlands The wetland limits were verified by the SFWMD on February 6, 2009 (Exhibits 11 and 12 of EIS). The wetlands within the project boundaries total 80.1 acres. Permanent wetland impacts totaling 2.36 acres include the following: 2.15 acres expected for the construction of the North Park Node. The bioswale will receive untreated storm water runoff from Golden Gate Parkway and treat the runoff to improve water quality in the Gordon River. See Exhibit 13 of EIS for Wetland Impacts map. The design of the project has been balanced between minimization of wetland impacts and the simultaneous need to protect listed species, e.g., gopher tortoise. habitat. The North Park Node has been sited in wetlands of poor quality as close to Golden Gate Parkway as possible to minimize access- associated impacts and secondary impacts to Wetland 2. According to the EIS, all boardwalk construction will minimize construction related impacts to the extent practicable and shading impacts through construction of boardwalks 5 feet above surface elevations to allow light penetration underneath. 3. Preservation Requirements The Collier Count) Land Development Code Section 3.05.07.13 requires designation of at least 15% of the native vegetation onsite as Preserve. For the subject project, the Preserve requirement is 16.92 acres (112.8 acres x 0.15). The Overall Project Site Concept Plan (Exhibit 7 of EIS) provides a designated Preserve of 22.2 acres. The onsite preserve prioritization hierarchy in the LDC and GMP requires that areas known to be utilized by listed species be a high priority for preservation. Therefore, gopher tortoise habitat was a priority for preservation in development of the site plan and nearly the entire occupied upland gopher tortoise habitat was included in the designated Preserve (Exhibit 9 of EIS). 4. Listed Species Approximately 316 gopher tortoise burrows were observed onsite by the environmental consultant. The project has minimized impacts to gopher tortoise habitat by locating the East Node parking in Wetland 2 adjacent to Golden Gate Parkway. Permitting for the relocation of gopher tortoises on the parcel adjacent to the zoo is required prior to site work. Potential effects on gopher tortoises during nature trail construction will be evaluated through consultation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and permitted as required. In addition, the construction and visitor interaction will be addressed in the Preserve Management Plan required with the Site Development Plan. The bridges and canoe /kayak launch have been located as far away from the Yellow- crowned Night Heron rookery as possible. Page 7 of 11 Packet Page -163- Gordon River EAC Staff Report - May 4, 2011 VII. EXISTING ZONING AND OVERLAYS A. Conservation (CON) Zoning To provide a brief history of the property, the site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C-1 (Commercial Intermediate), A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 82-2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. The applicant has requested for the CON zoning to be rezoned to P (Public Use) designation for use as a public park. The gopher tortoise in this area will be required to be relocated prior to impacts in accordance with the FFWCC regulations. B. Special Treatment (ST) Zoning Overlay — COMPANION ITEM PL 2011 -677 The project has a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay district designation on approximately 63.47 acres of the overall 123.6 acre project site. As a companion to the subject rezone request. an ST permit application is being reviewed as part of the public hearing process. Page 8 of 11 As stated in section 2.03.09.B. of the Land Development Code (LDC). the purpose and intent of the Conservation District (CON) district is -to conserve, protect and maintain vital natural resource lands within unincorporated Collier County that are owned primarily by the public. All native habitats possess ecological and physical characteristics that justify attempts to maintain these important natural resources. Barrier islands, coastal bays, wetlands, and habitat for listed species deserve particular attention because of their Q ecological value and their sensitivity to perturbation. All proposals for development in the 06 CON district must be subject to rigorous review to ensure that the impacts of the Edevelopment do not destroy or unacceptabl} degrade the inherent functional values. The CON District includes such public lands as Everglades National Park, Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, portions of the Big Cypress 0 Area of Critical State Concern. Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve.. Collier - Seminole N State Park, Rookery Bay National Estuarine Sanctuary Research Reserve, Delnor- N Wiggins State Park, and the National Audubon's Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (privately owned). and C.R.E. W. It is the intent of the CON District to require review of all development proposed within the CON District to ensure that the inherent value of the Countv's natural resources is not destroved or unacceptably altered. The CON District corresponds to and implements the conservation land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. To provide a brief history of the property, the site was previously zoned RO (Recreation Open Space), C-1 (Commercial Intermediate), A -2, and RMF -6. When Collier County created the Collier County Land Development Code in 1991, it created new zoning districts and eliminated others with the adoption of the new code (Ord. 91 -102). The RO and A -2 designations of the subject property were changed to CON and A and the C -3 and RMF -6 district designations remained. RO is the closest zoning district in zoning Ordinance 82-2 to the present CON district under the Land Development Regulations. The previous RO designation allowed for more intensive recreational uses than the requested P designation. The applicant has requested for the CON zoning to be rezoned to P (Public Use) designation for use as a public park. The gopher tortoise in this area will be required to be relocated prior to impacts in accordance with the FFWCC regulations. B. Special Treatment (ST) Zoning Overlay — COMPANION ITEM PL 2011 -677 The project has a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay district designation on approximately 63.47 acres of the overall 123.6 acre project site. As a companion to the subject rezone request. an ST permit application is being reviewed as part of the public hearing process. Page 8 of 11 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4. 2011 As stated in section 2.03.07.1). of the Land Development Code (LDC), the Special Treatment (ST) overlay district classification will be used for those lands of environmental sensitivity and historical and archaeological significance where the essential ecological or cultural value of the land is not adequately protected under the basic zoning district regulations established by Code or by ordinance. All land within the ST overlay district shall be designated as environmentally sensitive. Section 2.03.07.D. of the Land Development Code states the purpose and intent of the ST overlay district, and reads as follows: "Within the County there are certain areas, which because of their unique assemblages of flora and/or fauna, their aesthetic appeal, historical or archaeological significance, rarity in the County, or their contribution to their own and adjacent ecosystems, make them worthy of special regulations. Such regulations are directed toward the conservation, protection, and preservation of ecological and recreational values for the greatest benefit to the people of the County. Such areas include, but are not necessarily limited to, mangrove and freshwater swamps, barrier islands, hardwood hammocks, xeric scrubs, coastal beaches, estuaries, cypress domes, natural drainage ways, aquifer recharge areas, and lands and structures of historical and archaeological significance. The purpose of the "ST" district is to assure the preservation and maintenance of these environmental and cultural resources and to encourage the preservation of the intricate ecological relationships within the systems, and at the same time, permit those types of development which will hold changes to levels determined acceptable by the BCC after public hearing." Including temporary impacts, the total proposed altered area within the ST overlay district is 5.68 acres (9 %), with 1.81 acres of that being proposed impervious area. Temporary impacts include a two feet wide temporary construction impact area along both outside edges of the boardwalk, a total 12 feet of temporary construction impact along the asphalt trails, and potential excavation for utility piping /tie -in. Within the ST overlay area, the following are proposed: • The Northeast Development Node with its associated restroom, maintenance storage building, pavilion, parking, stormwater treatment areas, landscaping, and ancillary facilities. • Passive park amenities such as recreational multipurpose pedestrian/bicycle trails. boardwalks, associated shade structures, and lighting. • Fishing platform. • A water quality treatment facility to enhance water quality from stormwater runoff along Golden Gate Parkway. • Utility piping for water, sewer, and stormwater. • Pedestrian bridge. • Exotic plant removal. The design of the project has minimized wetland impacts by locating the parking area within wetlands of poor quality as close to Golden Gate Parkway as possible - discussion Page 9 of 11 Packet Page -165- t� a> 0 N CO N ti Gordon River EAC Staff Report — May 4, 2011 VII. VIII. above (B.2. Wetlands). The overall proposed GRGP project includes over 100 acres of undeveloped upland and wetland habitats, including a 22? acre preservation area. As a result of the proposed project. approximately 91% of the ST overlay area will remain unaltered except for the removal of exotic plants. Therefore. staff is in agreement with the applicant in stating that "the project will achieve the conservation goals envisioned with the original designation of a general conservation ST Overlay in this area." Final action on the site alteration plan requested with the Special Treatment Permit lies with the Board of County Commissioners. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for 1) Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone PL 2009 -25 and 2) Special Treatment Permit PL 2011 -677 revised on April 15.2011. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of 1) Gordon River Greenway Park Rezone PL 2009 -25 and 2) Special Treatment Penuit PL 2011-677. Pate 10 of 11 Gordon River EAC Staff Report —May 4. 2011 PREPARED BY: SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NANCY GUNDLACH,'A.I.C.P. PRINCIPAL PIrANNER COLLIEREOUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ,JACK MCKENNA, P.E. 'ENGINEERING REVIEW MANAGER COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RF,VIFWED BY: 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Y- If -o2011 DATE DATE DATE GERALD KURTZ, P.E. DATE MANAGER OF STORMWATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OF COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: DATE NICK CASALADGUE3ft' DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR Pale 11 of 11 Packet Page -167- jmb transportation engineering, inc. traffieltransportation engineering & planning TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK NATURE PRESERVE TRAIL EAST PARKING LOT (Project No. 094512) July 2, 2009 Prepared By: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 761 21"T Street NW Naples, Florida 34120 239- 919-2767 Packet Page -168- 2 -oy Date 7/26/2011 Item 8. 7/26/2011 Item 8. TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF REPORT 2 METHODOLOGY MEETING 2 SCOPE OF PROJECT 2 FIGURE 1 SITE PLAN PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC 3 TABLE 1 EXISTING + COMMITTED ROAD NETWORK 4 TABLE 2A PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 5 AREA OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 5 FIGURE 2A FIGURE 2B 2015 PROJECT BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS 6 2015 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS 6 2015 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS 6 CONCURRENCY REVIEW 6 TABLE 2B TABLE2C FIGURE 3 APPENDIX 7 Packet Page -169- r I. PURPOSE OF REPORT The following Report has been prepared pursuant to the criteria set forth by the'l rallic Impact Statement Guidelines for zoning applications as adopted by the Collier County Government. More specifically, this Repots examines the potential transportation related impacts which may occur as a result of the completion of this project. METHODOLOGY MEETING Prior to preparing the project's Traffic Impact Statement, a methodology meeting was conducted at the office of Collier County's Transportation Department. Attendees of this meeting were the Applicant's representatives (Mr. James M. Banks & Mr. Joshua Evans) and Collier County Government's representatives (Mr. John Podczerwinsky and Mr. Michael Greene). Copies of the agreed upon methodology have been provided in the Report's appendix. SCOPE OF PROJECT The project (referred to as the Gordon River Greenway Park — Nature Preserve Trail Fast Parking Lot) is located to the east of Goodlette Frank Road and south of Golden Gate Parkway (refer to Figure ) - Location Map /Roadway Classification). The project is a small scale recreation park with the primary purpose of providing pedestrian access to a nature preserve area. The park will consist of a nature trail, a gazebo, bathrooms, and 52 parking spaces. Vehicular ingress /egress to the Nature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot will be provided via a two -lane local road (to be constructed) that will extend north/south between the site and Golden Gate Parkway. The two lane road will provide right in/out access on Golden Gate Parkway. The nature trail is anticipated to be open to the public by the year 2011. Packet Page -170- 7/26/2011 Item 8. ■ 7/26/2011 Item 8. Pine Ridge Road 1 I 1 I J 1 I i 1 i 1 1 1 NORTH 1 1 1 t 1 ! 1 I 1 NI 1 1 I I i 1 1 m I i Golden Gate Parkway 1 i d TN4"h,eo NAPLES ZOO 1 d 1 1 f 1 1 ' 1 SITE 1 1 I a+ 1 H RQQro Rood � � LEGEND 1 S —LANE DIVIDED ARTERIAL w 4 —LANE DIVIDED ARTERIAL 2 —LANE COLLECTOR /LDCAL Gordon River Greenway Park I PROJECT LOCATION I ..ature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot & ROADWAY CLASS. FIGURE 1 Packet Page -171- x SS > f ' 1 S a d eN f f T� s i € Fy' � 4 I Ivull ia4 ;v -'-.................... .. .wL _............• - ........a. .., .,.. -- ...... --------- Packet Page -172- 7/26/2011 Iterr U �5 w �w Z QR o ao w m w w a Y GnG� 7/26/2011 Item 8. PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC It was determined that the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 'frip Generation Manual, 8`h Edition does not provide representative traffic data that can be relied upon for the purpose of estimating traffic demands associated with the Nature Preserve Trail. That is, the sample sites that were surveyed for ITE land use codes "City Park" (LUC 411) and "County Park" (LUC 412) were not consistent with the activities expected for the proposed nature trail. The use of the ITE traffic data would result in very low trip generation estimates. Therefore, it was agreed during the methodology meeting that the period of "greatest demand" would most likely occur on a Saturday. It was estimated that the Saturday peak how demand could be 75 to 80 percent of the park's parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate every hour. (A 50 percent per hour turnover rate was based on an average period -of -use per visitor being two hours in length.) During weekday conditions it is expected that the demand will likely be at a maximum of 25 percent of the parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate. Table l of this Report provides a detail of the calculations which were performed in estimating the project's anticipated trip generations. As shown, trip generation volumes for the AM and PM peak hours of the adjacent street, as well as, total daily periods were determined. The following smnmarizes the results of Table 1. Parking Land Use Capacity Nature Preserve 52 Spaces East Parking Lot Daily Saturday Traffic AM Peak PM Peak Peak Hr 130 ADT 26 VPH 26 VPH 42 VPH Based upon these results, the Report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 trip ends during the highest peak hour- As such, the Report investigated the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments considered to be "Small Scale ". Packet Page -173- 7/26/2011 Item 8. TABLE 1 Gordon River Greenway Park - Nature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot Trip Generation Computations Land Use Code Parking Capacity Nature Preserve Trail 52 Parking Spaces DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) Nature Preserve Trail Expected peak hour demand to be approximately 10% of the average daily traffic Therefore - Daily Traffic = (peak Hour)/(I 0 %) _ (13 vph)/(l 0%)-- 130 ADT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Nature Preserve Trail - 52 Parking Spaces Expected maximum 50% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 50% turnover rate/hour Therefore - AM Peak Hour = (500/b demand) *(52 parking spaces) *(50 * /o turnover rate/hour) _ Total AM Peak Hour= 26 vph Enter /Exit = 13/13 vph PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Nature Preserve Trail - 52 Parking Spaces Expected maximum 50% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 50% turnover rate/hour Therefore - PM Peak Hour =(50 %demand) *(52 parking spaces) *(50 %turnover rate/hour) _ Total PM Peak Hour = 26 vph Enter/Exit = 13 /13 vph SATURDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Nature Preserve Trail - 52 Parking Spaces Expected maximum g0% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 501/o turnover rate/hour Therefore - Saturday Peak Hour = (80%demand) *(52 parking spaces) *(50% turnover rate/hour) _ Total PM Peak Hour= 42 vph Enter /Exit = 21/21 vph Packet Page -174- 7/26/2011 Item 8. EXISTING t COMMITTED ROAD NETWORK Figure 1-- depiets the project's surrounding roadway conditions. There are no 5 -year committed roadway improvement projects which are relative to thisproject. As previously discussed, the project's primary access will be provided via the construction of a local road that will extend from the subject property and intersect Golden Gate Parkway. Access to Golden Gate Parkway will be retricted to right- in/out turning movements. Golden Gate Parkway is a six lane divided arterial having a posted speed limit of 45 MPH within proximity of the site. Table 2A provides a description of all roadways within the project's area of impact and their respective level of service performance standards. Packet Page -175- G) 2 4 n a m yx d 0 c S !A � a m yob a p F 3 O g a 3 x o�Il ° a CD �z mm � a� a 3 M r A O 0o m 0 0 ' S R ova 00 0� ooh < 9 V < 3 G m � N m y 9�a � n R a m w II== m Z Z' D OOn m Packet Page -176- 7/26/2011 Item I m n H a n v m 2 a` a N J e M 0 Ch —i Z1 � W Dm on 3 D n A 7/26/2011 Item &A PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress /egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, as well as, growth trends for the surrounding areas. Figure 2A provides a detail of the resultant traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Figure 2B provides a detail of the site access turning movement volumes for "net new" project traffic conditions. AREA OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%,2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 20/6 or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. As shown, there were no roadways which were found to be impacted by 2% or greater than its adopted level of service volume. Therefore, the area of impact will include: Roadway Links within Proiect's Area of Impact Golden Gate Parkway (Goodlette -Frank Road to Bears Paw) Intersections within the Proiect's Area of impact Site Access Golden Gate Parkway 5 Packet Page -177- t � RIB Y , C 4 D Goldin Gote Parkeay ���umr man N Fleiechmann 8 'd ' t ' LEGEND 7/26/2011 Item 8.A i I NORTH Krs. �p W M an ON an 0 a e S SITE PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT Gordon River Greenway Park PROJECT— GENERATED Jature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2A June b. 2009 Packet Page -178- S m n o° m 7/26/2011 Item 8.A 0 TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT = 21 VPH / 21 VPH 1 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT — 21 VPH / 21 VPH Drdon River Greenway Park I PROJECT— GENERATED I FIGURE 26 3ture Preserve Trail East Parking Lot I TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Packet Page -179- 1 � NORTH ► ` Golden Gate Parkway ► ' � � — ' AM 21 PM 1 a ► F�eVOnmOnn awa , N d / / ► SITE � N 1 S 1 m n o° m 7/26/2011 Item 8.A 0 TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT = 21 VPH / 21 VPH 1 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT — 21 VPH / 21 VPH Drdon River Greenway Park I PROJECT— GENERATED I FIGURE 26 3ture Preserve Trail East Parking Lot I TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Packet Page -179- V/MIXi1 fi■fisiii:1 2015 PROJECT BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS In order to establish 2015 project build -out traffic conditions, traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The 2015 peak season/peak houripeak direction factor as shown on Table 2B was derived from the 2008 Collier County Traffic Count Report. The annual growth rate was derived from historical traffic counts also described in the Traffic Count Report. After the correct adjustments were computed, the project generated traffic was then added to the 2015 Background Traffic. 2015 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS Refer to Table 2C and Figure 3 for 2015 level of service determinations for all roadways within the project's area of impact. As shown, all roadway links will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build -out traffic conditions. This conclusion is based upon no roadway improvements being needed to maintain acceptable levels of service for project build -out conditions. 2015 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS Refer to Table 2C for 2015 level of service determinations for all intersections within the project's area of impact. As shown, all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build -out traffic conditions. This conclusion is based upon no intersection improvements being needed to maintain acceptable levels of service for project build -out conditions. CONCURRENCY REVIEW It was concluded by the Report that all roadways within the project's area of impact will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build -out conditions. As such, this project will be in conformance with the Collier County Government's Concurrency Management System. 6 Packet Page -180- � | I (§ I! !! \� , §! §� § }§ /2 i§§ }� ! )k $k f!• ;a22 Packet Page et 7/26/2011 Re � C" /m t~ E z A 0 3 CA ■ 2§§f} , -. +■ y ;. Packet Page et 7/26/2011 Re � C" /m t~ E z A 0 3 CA 7/26/2011 It ; i } � ■ || G|/ Packet Page -a= �\ a . 2 \ Ifz. 0 k m � 0 > _,. 0 f!, ) ~ k � § 7@§ §¢t§ � ■ || G|/ Packet Page -a= 7/26/2011 Item i Pine Ridge Road 1 I I I 1 I f I I t 1 1 f I 1 f NORTH 1 i I I 1 I I I Nf 1 I 1 I E I (2559 — C 2� 2923 — C) 0 1 1 1 [2933 — C] 1 f ' o f Golden Gate Parkway 1 a "SW-d a f oI 1 NAPLES ZOO a I = f Z ' f SITE i f I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ►E '^ Radio Roa d' LEGEND f 000 — C 2009 PK HR/ PK DIRECTION TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE f (000 — C) 2015 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE [000 — Cl 2015 BACKGROUND + PROJECT TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE 1 Gordon River Greenway Park 2009 & 2015 ature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot I LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 3 Packet Page -183- METHODOLOGY MEETING REPORT APPENDIX Packet Page -184- 7/26/2011 Item 7/26/2011 Item GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK NATURE PRESERVE TRAIL EAST PARKING LOT METHODOLOGY MEETING Meeting Date: May 20,200 Packet Page -185- 7/26/2011 Item I As discussed during the May 20'h Methodology Meeting: I. The Kayak Park (access via Goodlette Frank Road) and the Nature Walk Park (access via Golden Gate Parkway will be reviewed separately for traffic impacts. Therefore, each park will need to have a separate traffic impact statement. 2. For the Kayak Park and Nature Walk Park use the growth rate established by the Collier County Traffic Count Report for the applicable roadway link, but no less than a 2% growth rate. Also, include "vested" trips per the 2008 AUIR. 3. it was discussed and ared that the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8 Edition does not provide representative traffic data that can be relied upon for the purpose of estimating traffic demands associated with the Kayak Park. The sample sites that were surveyed for ITE land use codes "City Park" (LUC 411) and "County Park" (LUC 412) were not consistent with the activities expected for the proposed kayak park. The use of the ITE traffic data would result in very low trip generation estimates. Therefore, it was agreed during the methodology meeting that the period of "greatest demand" would most likely occur on a Saturday. It was estimated that the Saturday peak hour demand could be 75 to 80 percent of the park's parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate every hour. (A 50 percent per hour turnover rare was based on an average period -of -use per visitor being two hours in length.) During weekday conditions it is expected that the demand will likely be at a maximum of 25 percent of the parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate. Packet Page -186- 7/26/2011 Item i APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 5-20-2009 Time: 1:00 PM Location: Collier County Government Offices (Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239 -919 -2767 2) Josh Evans, Grady Minor, 239 - 947 -1144 3) John Podczerwinsky, Collier County Government, 239 - 774 -8192 4) Michael Greene, Collier County Government, 239 - 774 -8192 5) Study Preparer Preparer's Name and Title: James M. Banks, P.E.. President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 761 21" Street NW Naples, Florida 34120 (239) -919- 2767 Review.erLs)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Greene, Planning Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name & Title: John Podczerwinsky. Proiect Manager Organization & Telephone Number. Collier County Transportation Planning Department Amplicant: Applicant's Name: Collier County Government Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Gordon River Greenwav Park — Nature Preserve Trail East Parking Lot Location: SE comer of Goodlette -Frank Road 01 Golden Gate Parkway Land Use Type: County Pmt/Kayak & Canoe Lium ITE Code #: N/A Proposed number of development units: East Park = 52 Parking Spaces Other. Description. Zoning Application Packet Page -187- 7/26/2011 Item P Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached Methodology Report Study Type: Small Scale TIS X Study Area: Boundaries: See Attached Map Additional intersections to be analyzed: Horizon Year(s): 2015 Analysis Time Period(s): AM and PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: Based upon estimated maximum use of available oarkine spaces Reductions in Trio Generation Rates- Pass-by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: None Methodolaev & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Attached Trip distribution method: Manual Traffic assignment method: Manual Traffic growth rate: See Attached Table 2A, NOTE., Minimum growth rare o(2% Packet Page -188- 7/26/2011 Item I jmb transportation engineering, inc. traffic /transportation engineering & planning TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK KAYAK LAUNCH (Project No. 090511) July 2, 2009 Prepared By: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 761 21ST Street NW Naples, Florida 34120 239 - 919 -2767 Z'Z -7-7-01 Ja . Banks, P.E. Date Reg. o.43860 Packet Page -189- 7/26/2011 Item 8. TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF REPORT 2 METHODOLOGY MEETING 2 SCOPE OF PROJECT 2 FIGURE 1 SITE PLAN PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC 3 TABLE 1 EXISTING + COMMITTED ROAD NETWORK 4 TABLE2A PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 5 AREA OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 5 FIGURE 2A FIGURE 2B 2015 PROJECT BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS 6 2015 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS 6 2015 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS 6 CONCURRENCY REVIEW 6 TABLE 2B TABLE 2C FIGURE 3 APPENDIX 7 Packet Page -190- 7/26/2011 Item 8. PURPOSE OF REPORT The following Report has been prepared pursuant to the criteria set forth by the Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for zoning applications as adopted by the Collier County Government. More specifically, this Report examines the potential transportation related impacts which may occur as a result of the completion of this project. METHODOLOGY MEETING Prior to preparing the project's Traffic Impact Statement, a methodology meeting was conducted at the office of Collier County's Transportation Department. Attendees of this meeting were the Applicant's representatives (Mr. James M. Banks & Mr. Joshua Evans) and Collier County Government's representatives (Mr. John Podczerwinsky and Mr. Michael Greene). Copies of the agreed upon methodology have been provided in the Report's appendix. SCOPE OF PROJECT The project (referred to as the Gordon River Greenway Park — Kayak Launch) is located to the east of Goodlette Frank Road and south of Golden Gate Parkway (refer to Figure 1- Location Map/Roadway Classification). The project is a small scale recreation park with the primary purpose of providing canoe and kayak access to the Gordon River, as well as, pedestrian access to a nature preserve. The park will consist of a vessel launch area, bathrooms, 51 parking spaces and pedestrian access to the nature trail. Vehicular ingress/egress to the Kayak Park will be provided via a two-lane local road (to be constructer) that will extend between the park and the existing signalized intersection of Fleischmann Boulevard @ Goodlette Frank Road. The two lane road will create the westbound approach at the intersection and provide access to the Naples Zoo, the Kayak Park and also function as a secondary access for a planned congregate care retirement community (known as the Bridges at Gordon River). The kayak park is anticipated to be open to the public by the year 2011. Packet Page -191- 7/26/2011 Item 8. Pine Ridge Rood J I NORTH Uri' &' ( i m w $ ' Golden Gale Parkway ' U 1 - - - - L/- a �vd m ¢ apnn NAPLES zoo SITE a' ' a ' 0 Jf Y Radio Ro adl�_ LEGEND 6—LANE OMDEO ARTERIAL 4—LANE DIVIDED ARTERIAL 2 —LANE COLLECTOR /LOCAL Gordon River Greenway Park PROJECT LOCATION Kayak & Canoe Launch Park & ROADWAY CLASS. FIGURE 1 June 5, 2009 Packet Page -192- � _......___... -- 222211 @mE �..��. \..��.. § \2 ~...2 \ ] ; z Packet Page -as ., 7/26/2011 Item 8. PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC It was determined that the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8d' Edition does not provide representative traffic data that can be relied upon for the purpose of estimating traffic demands associated with the Kayak Park. That is, the sample sites that were surveyed for ITE land use codes "City Park" (LUC 411) and "County Park" (LUC 412) were not consistent with the activities expected for the proposed kayak park. The use of the ITE traffic data would result in very low trip generation estimates. Therefore, it was agreed during the methodology meeting that the period of -greatest demand" would most likely occur on a Saturday. It was estimated that the Saturday peak hour demand could be 75 to 80 percent of the park's parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate every hour. (A 50 percent per hour turnover rate was based on an average period-of-use per visitor being two hours in length.) During weekday conditions it is expected that the demand will likely be at a maximum of 25 percent of the parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate. Table 1 of this Report provides a detail of the calculations which were performed in estimating the project's anticipated trip generations. As shown trip generation volumes for the AM and PM peak hours of the adjacent street, as well as, total daisy periods were determined. The following summarizes the results of Table 1. Parking Daily Saturday Land Use Capacity Traffic AM Peak PM Peak Peak Hr Kayak Park 51 Spaces 130 ADT 26 VPH 26 VPH 42 VPH Based upon these results, the Report concludes that the project will generate less than 50 trip ends during the highest peak hour. As such, the Report investigated the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments considered to be "Small Scale ". Packet Page -194- 7/26/2011 Item 8. TABLE 1 Gordon River Greenway Park — Kayak Launch Trip Generation Computations Land Use Code Parking Capacity Kayak Launch & Nature Walk 51 Parking Spaces DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) Kayak Launch & Nature Walk Expected peak hour demand to be approximately 10% of the average daiuly traffic Therefore — Daily Traffic = (peak Hour)/(I 0 %) = (13 vph) /(l0%) 130 ADT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Kayak Launch & Nature Walk — 51 Parking Spaces Expected maximum 50% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 501/o turnover rate/hour Therefore — AM Peak Hour = (50% demand) *(51 parking spaces) *(50% turnover rate/hour) _ Total AM Peak Hour = 26 vph Enter/Exit= 13/13 vph PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Kayak Launch & Nature Walk — 51 Parking Spaces Expected maximum 50% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 50% turnover rate/hour Therefore — PM Peak Hour = (50% demand) *(51 parking spaces) *(50% turnover rate/hour) _ Total PM Peak Hour = 26 vph Enter/Exit = 13 /13 vph SATURDAY PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (VPH) Kayak Launch & Nature Walk — 51 Parking Spaces Expected maximum 80% demand of parking capacity Expected average use per visitor is two hours, which results in a 50% turnover rate/hour Therefore — Saturday Peak Hour = (800/a demand) *(51 parking spaces) *(50% turnover rate/hour) _ Total PM Peak Hour= 42 vph Enter /Exit = 21/21 vph Packet Page -195- 7/26/2011 Item 8. EXISTING + COMMITTED ROAD NETWORK Figure I depicts the project's surrounding roadway conditions. There are no 5 -year committed roadway improvement projects which are relative to this project. As previously discussed, the project's primary access will be provided via the construction of a local road that will extend from the subject property and intersect the intersection of Fleischman Boulevard @ Goodiette Frank Road. The construction of the local road will create the westbound approach to the Fleischmann Boulevard @ Goodlette Frank Road intersection. The proposed westbound interconnect will accommodate ingress /egress traffic associated with the Bridges at Gordon River CCRC, the Naples Zoo, and the Kayak Park. Goodlette Frank Road is a six lane divided arterial having a posted speed limit of 45 MPH. Fleischmann Boulevard is considered a two -lane collector having a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. The intersection of Goodlette Frank Road @ Fleischmann Boulevard is signalized. Table 2A provides a description of all roadways within the project's area of impact and their respective level of service performance standards. Packet Page -196- 7/26/2011 Item , >) )Ak „ �k\ §§ a & LA 5§ 0 Packet Pag e�9- k 0 2� > >m n> § 0 q @@ 7 k k CL ■ � 2 � \ � | ƒ; ; «X§ (§ { {3 . \ >) )Ak „ �k\ §§ a & LA 5§ 0 Packet Pag e�9- k 0 2� > >m n> § 0 q @@ CL r� mm m�0 | «X§ ))-3 I7 61 6 I z =! >) )Ak „ �k\ §§ a & LA 5§ 0 Packet Pag e�9- k 0 2� > >m n> § 0 q 7/26/2011 Item 8. PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress; current and future traffic patterns in the area; as well as, growth trends for the surrounding areas. Figure 2A provides a detail of the resultant traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Figure 2B provides a detail of the site access turning movement volumes for "net new" project traffic conditions. AREA OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2 %, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. As shown, there were no roadways which were found to be impacted by 2% or greater than its adopted level of service volume. Therefore, the area of impact will include: Roadway Links within Project's Area of Impact Goodlette -Frank Road (U.S. 41 to Fleischmann Boulevard) Goodlette -Frank Road (Fleischmann Boulevard to Golden Gate Parkway) Intersections within the Project's Area of Impart Fleischmann Boulevard @ Goodlette -Frank Road Packet Page -198- 7/26/2011 Item 8. ■ NORTH N.T.S. t �I� Y ► c a ° W m ► r T o ' i a Q W Vy ' Gowen Gate Parkway ' ~S , e a° F1eMC °Tan^ BMA , ► ► ► ► ' LEGEND M 42 7� PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT �n. Gordon River Greenway Park PROJECT— GENERATED <ayak & Canoe Launch Park TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2A June 5, 2009 Packet Page -199- 7/26/2011 Item 8. 0 o: Y o NORTH � KTS I Golden Gate Parkway 0 0 0 Golden Gate Parkway 0 a 0 AM 10 PM 10 Q AM 4 PM 4 AM 7 PM 7 Fleischmann Blvd AM 4 PM 4 —� Goodlette— Frank/ I Fleischmann Blvd Site Access a n TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT = 21 VPH / 21 VPH TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR ENTER /EXIT = 21 VPH / 21 VPH Gordon River Greenway Park PROJECT— GENERATED Kayak & Canoe Launch Park TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 28 June 5, 2009 Packet Page -200- 7/26/2011 Item 8. 2015 PROJECT BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS In order to establish 2015 project build -out traffic conditions, traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The 2015 peak season/peak hour /peak direction factor as shown on Table 2B was derived from the 2008 Collier County Traffic Count Report. The annual growth rate was derived from historical traffic counts also described in the Traffic Count Report After the correct adjustments were computed, the project generated traffic was then added to the 2015 Background Traffic. Intersection turning movement counts were performed at the intersection of Fleischman Boulevard @ Goodlette -Frank Road (refer to page FBGFR -2 for a detail of the raw traffic counts). In order to establish 2015 project build -out traffic conditions, the intersection turning movement counts were adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour factors and annual growth rate have been depicted on page FBGFR -2 of the Report. The adjustment factors were derived from the 2008 Collier County Traffic Count Report. The annual growth rate was derived from historical traffic counts also described in the Traffic Count Report. After the correct adjustments were computed, the project generated traffic was then added to the 2015 Background Traffic (see page FBGFR -2). Pages FBGFR-3 and FBGFR4 provide a graphic representation of the 2008, 2015, project traffic and 2015 plus project traffic conditions, respectively. 2015 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS Refer to Table 2G and Figure 3 for 2015 level of service determinations for all roadways within the project's area of impact. As shown, all roadway links will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build -out traffic conditions. This conclusion is based upon no roadway improvements being needed to maintain acceptable levels of service for project build -out conditions. 2015 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DETERMINATIONS Refer to Table 2C for 2015 level of service determinations for all intersections within the project's area of impact. As shown, all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build-out traffic conditions. This conclusion is based upon no intersection improvements being needed to maintain acceptable levels of service for project build -out conditions. CONCURRENCY REVIEW It was concluded by the Report that all roadways within the project's area of impact will operate at acceptable levels of service for 2015 project build -out conditions. As such, this project will be in conformance with the Collier County Government's Concurrency Management System. Packet Page -201- 0 O 6 m g T a J F A a �+ c m o � T _m u S 3 Y Q � am g � T 0 i n S 3 r J J m 6 C 0 2 4 T a F b w a 8m V 60 f. a 0 N�Y IS � J• v 7C 9 J � H 0 p 9 J 7C 9 6 O O G J � Packet Page -202- 7/26/2011 Item N N 0 Cn D� vM �m D N r_ Z 0 C 3 M w W P p S � Y � S O O L4kljJ � C J ti a W W O W W p b G J b w a 8m V 60 f. a 0 N�Y IS � J• v 7C 9 J � H 0 p 9 J 7C 9 6 O O G J � Packet Page -202- 7/26/2011 Item N N 0 Cn D� vM �m D N r_ Z 0 C 3 M w W 0 T O O 0 M p 0 S 4 T = a = = m x a n a T T C C q N ' 3 m � n n O o 3 n a 2L /CD z x yT = a q N x v g °xe s Z x� N. � m nn oaN 0 a'S a� fn S M n ? z =oc a = n D m jG T O i N D n n p M n C J C a � y D JC T oLD a z u ]F ro N T q S D 09 C C 1N y 9 CA x a m a n = T � pM x v O x p ` _ s m � nO 3 C N v n° O O v O` q A F 1 W N+ G _ = O T 9 m x s m o L O_ Co ; 5 N 9 a o 0 r O r N q a r g o a ^�' b a c b _ e w Packet Page -203- 7/26/2011 Item N O i X 0 D Q D rr z A < —i r, CO M m_N n n n D z r 5i 7/26/2011 Item 8.A ! Pine Ridge Rood I ! I I I 1 1 I 1 I I NORTH f I i 1 1 I 1 I Vi I 1 I Gdden Gote Porkwoy ; 9 ' n Fle V P O Z00 m C INAPLES x(58 =C)1 0l Jf j(511 — C] Z f2183 — C 1 ! — (2493 — C) ' 1 (2504 — Cl I i vi Radio Road LEGEND f 000 — C 2009 PK HR/ PK DIRECTION TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE ! (000 — C) 2015 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE (000 — Cl 2015 BACKGROUND + PROJECT TRAFFIC — LEVEL OF SERVICE 1 Gordon River Greenway Park 2009 & 2015 Kayak & Canoe Launch Park LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 3 Packet Page -204- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A APPENDIX INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES HCS LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSES METHODOLOGY MEETING REPORT 7 Packet Page -205- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Intersection: Fleischmann Blvd and Goodlette•Frank Rd Date of Count: 03/132008 I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I Total All AM Period I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I rch's 7:00 -7:15 1 14 0 10 I 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 i 1 0 7 I 38 7:15 - 7:30 I 5 0 8 I 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 2 0 22 I 43 7:30 - 7:45 I 11 0 14 I 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 I 1 0 29 I 61 7:45 - 8:00 I 12 0 23 1 1 0 0 1 14 0 0 1 4 0 41 I 95 8:00 -8:15 I 18 0 39 I 0 0 0 1 11 0 3 1 4 0 37 1 112 8:15 -0:30 I 8 0 23 1 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 1 5 0 47 1 103 8:30 - 8:45 1 16 0 23 1 0 0 0 1 20 0 2 1 4 0 27 1 92 8:45 - 9:00 1 I 27 0 15 I I 0 0 0 1 19 I 0 1 1 6 I 0 27 1 95 I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I PM Period I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 4:00 - 4:15 1 69 0 43 I 0 3 2 I 49 0 3 1 5 0 23 1 197 4:15 - 4:30 1 76 0 33 I 1 3 2 I 49 0 0 1 3 0 30 1 197 4:30 - 4:45 1 52 1 49 1 2 2 3 I 53 0 2 I 5 0 23 1 192 4:45 - 5:00 1 71 2 33 1 2 2 6 I 65 0 2 i 0 0 44 1 227 5:00 - 5:15 1 80 2 43 1 1 3 6 I 53 0 1 I 2 0 35 1 226 5:15 -5:30 1 72 1 41 1 0 2 3 I 44 0 0 1 0 0 41 1 204 5:30 - 5:45 1 49 0 38 1 1 2 4 1 42 0 4 I 5 0 33 1 178 5:45 - 6:00 1 75 0 35 1 0 0 0 I 41 0 1 1 3 0 51 1 206 AM Period 8:00 -9:00 PM Period 4:15 - 5:15 HIGHEST PEAK HOUR TURNI Eastbound I Westbound L T R 1 L T R I 69 0 100 I 0 0 0 I I 279 5 158 1 6 10 17 MG MOVEMENT VOLUMES Northbound 1 Southbound L T R I L T R I 70 1320 6 1 19 1975 138 I I 220 1975 5 1 10 1320 132 FBGFR- 1 Packet Page -206- Intersection: Fletschmann Btvd and Goodlette -Frank Rd Date of Count: 03/13/2008 2008 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I AM Period 1 69 0 100 1 0 0 0 I 70 1320 6 1 i I I I PM Period 1 279 5 158 I 6 10 17 1 220 1975 5 1 7/26/2011 Item 8.A Southbound 1 L T R I 19 1975 138 1 I 10 1320 132 1 2008 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS Seasonal Adjustment Factor = 1 I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 l T R 1 • AM Period 1 69 0 100 1 0 0 0 1 I 70 1320 6 1 I 19 1975 138 1 I I PM Period 1 I 279 5 158 1 6 10 17 1 220 1975 5 1 10 1320 132 1 2015 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS Annual Growth Rate = 2.0% 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 AM Period 1 79 0 115 I 0 0 0 1 I I 80 1516 7 1 I 22 2269 159 1 I I PM Period 1 320 6 181 I 7 11 20 1 253 2269 6 1 it 1516 152 1 PROJECT BUILD -OUT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 - I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 AM POod 1 0 4 0 I 7 4 10 I 0 0 7 1 10 0 0 1 I - PM Period 1 i I 0 4 0 1 7 4 10 1 I 0 0 7 1 I 10 0 0 1 - 2015 PEAK SEASON PEAK HOUR "+" PROJECT TRAFFIC I Eastbound 1 westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 _ AM Period 1 79 4 115 I 7 4 10 i 80 1516 14 i 32 2269 159 1 I PM Period 1 i I 320 10 181 1 14 15 30 1 I 253 2269 13 1 i 21 1516 152 i FBGFR- 2 Packet Page -207- 7126/2011 Item 8.A Intersection Flelechmann Blvd and Goodlette -Frank Rd FBGFR- 3 Packet Page -208- A n 2132 1 1 1462 I I 1 1389 I 1 I I 1 2271 v 1 v 138 1976 19 I 1 I I 132 1320 10 I I I I I I <— v —> I I I I <— v —> — A n n n 208 69 —1 1 —0 0 1 362 279 —1 1 —17 < —_ c—_ I <— <— 33 0—> 2008 AM PEAK HOUR < —0 I S—> 2006 PM PEAK HOUR c —10 s BACKGROUND TRAFFIC —> I —> BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 20 —> 189 100 -1 1 —0 261 442 158 -1 I —6 — v v v v I I I I I I I — I 1 I 70 1320 7 I I I I 220 1976 5 A 1 n 2075 1 1464 1 _ I I 1797 1 1 2200 v v FBGFR- 3 Packet Page -208- A n 2449 1 1 1679 1 1696 2609 v v 169 2269 22 I I I I I 152 1516 11 I I I I I I < _ v —> I I I I I < — v —> — n n I n n 239 79 — I I — 0 0 1 416 320-1 1 —20 < —_ <— I <, <— 38 _ 0 —> 2015 AM PEAK HOUR < — 0 1 6—> 2015 PM PEAK HOUR < —11 s BACKGROUND TRAFFIC —> I —> BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 23 --> 194 115-1 1 — 0 29 1 508 181 —1 1 — 7 — v v 1 v v <— n _> I I I I I <— n _> I I I — I I I 80 1516 7 I 1 I I I 253 2269 8 A 1 n 2384 1 1705 1 1 1604 I 1 2527 v v FBGFR- 3 Packet Page -208- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A -_ Intersection Fleischmann Blvd and Goodlette -Frank Rd A A 10 to I I I I I 1 10 1 1 10 v 1 v 0 0 t0 1 0 0 10 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I <— v —> I <— v —> A A 1 A A 4 0 -1 1 —10 21 1 4 0 -1 1 –10 <— <—I <- 4—> PROJECT 8/0 TRAFFIC < -4 1 4 —> PROJECT BID TRAFFIC < -4 —> AM PEAK HOUR — > 1 —> PM PEAK HOUR 4 0 -1 1 —7 211 4 0 -1 I –7 v v 1 v v < — n —> 1 < _ n —> I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 7 I 0 0 7 c— 21 21— A I A 7 I I 7 1 I I I 7 I I I I 7 v v c— 21 21— Packet Page -209- A n 2459 1 1 1689 I I I 1 1605 I I I I I 2619 v I v 169 2259 32 I I I 1 I 162 1516 21 I I I I I I < — v — > I 1 1 I I < — v —> A n n n 243 79 —1 1 —10 21 1 420 320-1 1 —30 <— c— I <— <— 69 4—> 2015 AM PEAK HOUR < —4 1 10 —> 2015 PM PEAK HOUR < –15 —,> BACKGROUND TRAFFIC —> I —> BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 44 —> 198 116 —1 "a" PROJECT TRAFFIC 1 —7 50 1 612 181 — I ' +" PROJECT TRAFFIC 1 –14 v v 1 v v <— A —> I I I I I <— n —> I I I I I I 60 1518 14 I 1 I 1 I 263 2260 13 A 1 A 2391 1 1 1712 1 I I I tell I 1 I I I 2634 v v FBGFR- 4 Packet Page -209- W- Mi7diEfZT1411F:T HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: jmb Inter.: Fleischmann @ Goodlette -Frank Agency: Area Type: CBD or Similar Date: 6/6/2009 Jurisd: Period: AM Peak Hour Year 2015 Project Build -out Project ID: E/W St: Fleischmann Boulevard N/S St: Goodlette Frank Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T P I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 179 4 115 17 4 10 180 1516 14 132 2269 159 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 f RTOR Vol 1 20 0 1 0 I 25 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left_ A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WE Left A i SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A I Right A _ Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WE Right Green 12.0 0.0 12.7 51.3 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 i.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 167 1253 0.50 0.13 38.5 D TR 191 1436 0.54 0.13 39.7 D 39.2 D Westbound L 157 1180 0.04 0.13 34.1 C - TR 203 1522 0.07 0.13 34.3 C 34.2 C Northbound - L 305 1593 0.28 0.77 14.7 S TR 2600 4561 0.62 0.57 13.3 B 13.4 B Southbound - L 331 1624 0.10 0.77 5.0 A TR 2582 4529 0.98 0.57 32.1 C 31.7 C - Intersection Delay = 25.1 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C Packet Page -210- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A HCS +: Signalized Intersections Release 5.21 Analyst: jmb Inter.: Fleischmann @ Goodlette -Frank Agency: Area Type: CBD or Similar r- te: 6/6/2009 Jurisd: iod: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 Project Build -out Project ID: E/W St: Fleischmann Boulevard NIS St: Goodlette Frank Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T P. I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 ! 1 3 0 LGConfig I L TR 1 L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1320 10 181 114 15 30 1253 2269 13 121 1516 152 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 20 1 0 1 0 1 25 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Reds Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right °een 27.4 0.0 9.0 49.6 0.0 _low 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ill Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs _ Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 333 1217 1.01 0.27 88.7 F TR 395 1442 0.46 0.27 31.0 C 68.6 E Westbound L 26B 97B 0.06 0.27 26.9 C TR 422 1539. 0.11 0.27 27.3 C 27.2 C Northbound L 215 1593 1.24 0.64 168.6 F TR 2263 4563 1.06 0.50 62.9 E 73.5 E Southbound L 218 1624 0.10 0.64 18.9 B TR 2239 4514 0.77 0.50 22.3 C 22.3 C Intersection Delay = 54.4 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = D Packet Page -211- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK - KAYAK PARK METHODOLOGY MEETING Meeting Date: May 20, 2009 Packet Page -212- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A As discussed during the May 20`h Methodology Meeting: 1. The Kayak Park (access via Goodlette Frank Road) and the Nature Walk Park (access via Golden Gate Parkway will be reviewed separately for traffic impacts. Therefore, each park will need to have a separate traffic impact statement. 2. Also, an operational analysis of the Fleischmann Boulevard @ Goodlette Frank Road intersection will need to be prepared that will consider all traffic impacts associated with the Naples Zoo, the Kayak Park and the Bridges at Gordon River Congregate Care Retirement Community. The operational analysis will need to be provided to Collier County with the SDP submittal for the construction of the proposed two -lane local road that will provide access to all three land uses. 3. The operational analysis will consider AM and PM Weekday traffic, as well as, Saturday peak hour traffic demands. 4. For the Kayak Park and Nature Walk Park use the growth rate established by the Collier County Traffic Count Report for the applicable roadway link, but no less than a 2% growth rate. Also, include `bested" trips per the 2008 AUIR. 5. It was discussed and greed that the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 8 Edition does not provide representative traffic data that can be relied upon for the purpose of estimating traffic demands associated with the Kayak Park. The sample sites that were surveyed for ITE land use codes "City Park" (LUC 411) and "County Park" (LUC 412) were not consistent with the activities expected for the proposed kayak park. The use of the ITE traffic data would result in very low trip generation estimates. Therefore, it was agreed daring the methodology meeting that the period of "greatest demand" would most likely occur on a Saturday. It was estimated that the Saturday peak hour demand could be 75 to 80 percent of the park's parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate every hour. (A 50 percent per hour turnover rate was based on an average period -of -use per visitor being two hours in length) During weekday conditions it is expected that the demand will likely he at a maximum of 25 percent of the parking capacity with a 50 percent per hour turnover rate. 2 Packet Page -213- 7/26/2011 Item &A APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 5 -20 -2009 Time: 1:00 PM Location: Collier County Government Offices (Horseshoe Drivel People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239 - 919 -2767 2) Josh Evans, Grady Minor, 239 - 947 -1144 3) John Podczerwinsky, Collier County Government, 239 - 774 -8192 4) Michael Greene, Collier County Government, 239 - 774 -8192 5) Study Prevarer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M. Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 761 210 Street NW Naples, Florida 34120 (239) -919- 2767 Reviewer's): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Greene- Plannine Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name & Title: John Podczerwinskv. Project Manager Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Applicant: Applicant's Name: Collier County Government Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Gordon River Greenway Park — Kayak Park Location: SE corner of Goodlette -Frank Road Q Golden Gate Parkway Land Use Type: County ParkMavak & Canoe Launch ITE Code #: N/A Proposed number of development units: Kayak Park = 51 Parking Spaces Other: Description: Zoning Application Packet Page -214- Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached Methodology Report Study Type: Small Scale TIS X Study Area: Boundaries: See Attached Map Additional intersections to be analyzed: Horizon Year(s): 2015 Analysis Time Period(s): AM and PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: Based upon estimated maximum use of available pakine spaces Reductions in TAn Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: None Methodoloey & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Attached Trip distribution method: Manual Traffic assignment method: Manual Traffic growth rate: See Attached Table 2A NOTE: Minimum growth rate oft% Packet Page -215- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. ORDINANCE NO. 11- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE, ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM RURAL AGRICULTURE (A), RURAL AGRICULTURE (A) WITH AN ST OVERLAY, CONSERVATION (CON), CONSERVATION (CON) WITH AN ST OVERLAY, COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C- 3), RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY DISTRICT 6 [RMF -6(3)] AND RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY DISTRICT 6 [RMF -6(3)] WITH ST OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE PUBLIC USE ('P) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WITH AN ST OVERLAY TO BE KNOWN AS THE GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE 123.6 + /- ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GOODLETTE -FRANK ROAD (CR -851) AND SOUTH OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR -886), IN SECTIONS 27 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, J. P. Marchland, P.E. of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., representing Collier County. petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property more particularly, described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, located in Sections 27 and 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Rural Agriculture (A), Rural Agriculture (A) with an ST Overlay, Conservation (CON), Conservation (CON) with an ST Overlay, Commercial Intermediate (C -3), Residential Multi - Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] and Residential Multi - Family District 6 [RMF -6(3)] with ST Overlay zoning districts to the Public Use (P) zoning district for a 123.6+'- acre public park with an ST Overlay to be known as The Gordon River Greenwav Puk / RZ- PL2009 -25 Revised 6/08/11 1 Packet Page -216- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. Gordon River Greenway Park, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit B. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super - majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2011. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Steven T. Williams Assistant County Attorneyg11i Attachments: Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval CP \09- CPS - 00974 \50 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA C Gordon River Greenway Park / RZ- 111,2009 25 Revised 6/09!11 Packet Page -217- FRED W. COYLE, Chairman 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (O.R.B. 4013, PGS. 0757 -0760) THE SOUTHEAST (SE1 /4) QUARTER OF NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE1 /4) QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF THE CREEK, LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING TWO PARCELS: ALL THAT TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST BOUNDARY OF STORTER SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF A CANAL, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 106; RUN IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION 149.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF GORDON RIVER HOMES SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 84; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF GORDON RIVER HOMES A DISTANCE OF 133.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF GORDON RIVER; THENCE IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION FOLLOWING THE MEANDERINGS OF THE M.H.W. LINE OF THE GORDON RIVER TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF THE CANAL IN STORTER SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 106; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE1 /4) QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER, SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT KNOWN AS "POINT 0= ENDING OF BULKHEAD LINE NUMBER 3" AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED ON THE BULKHEAD LINE PLAT, RECORDED IN BULKHEAD LINE PLAT BOOK 1 AT PAGE 24, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; RUN SOUTH 89'42'35" EAST, ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE NUMBER 3, FOR 217.80 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 29'16'45" EAST, STILL ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE, FOR 144.56 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89'42'36" WEST, FOR 289.14 FEET, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST (SE1 /4) QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF BEMBURY DRIVE BY POSSESSION AS MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND, SAID POINT BEING 362.32 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST (SE1 /4) QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE1 /4) QUARTER AS SHOWN ON SAID BULKHEAD PLAT (SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THE NORTHERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF BEMBURY DRIVE IS SHOWN AS BEING 360 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTHWEST CORNER ON PLAT OF STORTER SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 106, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA); THENCE RUN NORTH 0'17'24" EAST, ALONG THE AFORMENTIONED WEST LINE FOR 125.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 0.732 ACRES; TOGETHER WITH ALL RIPARIAN RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY LAND CONTIGUOUS TO, AND WATERWARD OF, THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PORTION OF BULKHEAD LINE NUMBER 3, EXHIBIT A Packet Page -218- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. DESCRIPTION All of Lot 97 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms, lying South of Golden Gate Parkway, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Less and Except the following Access Easement The East 60 feet of that port of Lot 97 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, lying south of Golden Gate Parkway and within Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida: And less the North 120 feet of the East 120 feet of Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County Florida: being and lying within Lot 97 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Forms Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plot Book 2, Pogo 2, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Together with Lot 3 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Less and Except That part of Lot 3 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Forms subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County. Florida, lying Easterly and Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at o concrete monument at the South 1/4 corner of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; Thence along the South line, North 89'26'09" East 753.94 feet to a point: Thence South 00'21'55" East 334.85 feet to a concrete monument on the south line of said Lot 3 and the Point of Beginning of the described line: Thence along said described line and the Westerly boundary of the herein described parcel North 00'21'55' West 711.15 feet to concrete monument at the Northwest corner of said described Parcel: Thence along said described line and the Northerly boundary of said described parcel North 8735'05" East 729.90 feet to a concrete monument: Thence continue North 89'38'05' East 13.00 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of Lot 3, Naples Improvement Company's Little Forms and the Point of Ending of said described line. Also Less and Except That port of Lot 3 of Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Hook 2, Page 2, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; Commencing at the South 1/4 comer of Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; Thence North 69 °46'00° East 74.16 feet to o point on the East right— of —woy of Goodlette —Frank Road; Thence along said right —of —way North 04 °39'15' West 148.44 feet to the North line of said Lot 3; Thence leaving said right —of —way and along the North line of said Lot 3 North 89 "40'10" East 761.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence continue along said line North 89 °40'10" East 191.50 feet; Thence South 28 °23'14" West 105.55 feet; Thence South 89 °47'09" West 137.16 feet; Thence North 01'38'39" West 94.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. And Less That land described in Official Records Book 246, Page 59, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being a right —of —way taking for Goodlette —Fronk Road. (Detail "5") Packet Page -219- CONDITION FOR APPROVAL FOR RZ- PL2009 -25 1. The land use is limited to parks, recreational services and parking facilities. 2. Treatment swales shall be added to walking trails. 3. The preserve area shall remain at 22 acres. 4. Fifty percent or greater of the parking stalls shall be grassed parking. Rev. June 7. 2011 EXHIBIT B Packet Page -220- 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 7/26/2011 Item 8.A. 28D a Friday, June 3, 2011 a Naples Dally News NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, June 28, 2011, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enact- ment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUW TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE.COL- LIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHEW SIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF tOLL1ER COUN- TY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER- TY FROM RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A), RURAL AGRICULTURE (A) WITH AN 57 OVER- LAY; CONSERVATION (CON), CONSERVATION (CON) WITH AN ST OVERLAY, COM- MERCIAL INTERMEDIATE (C -3), RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY DISTRICT 6 [RMF -6(3)) AND RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY DISTRICT 6 [RMF -6(3)) WITH ST OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE PUBLIC USE (P) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PUBLIC PARK WITH AN ST OVERLAY TO BE KNOWN AS THE GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE 123.6 + /- ACRE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCAT- ED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GOODLETTE -FRANK ROAD (CR -851) AND SOUTH OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (CR -886), IN SECTIONS 27 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed..ln- dividual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any Item. The selection of an indi- vidual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must sabmit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is based, - If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to par - tic pate in the proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of 'certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Depart- ment,.located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naplez, Florida 34112, (239) 252 -8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK _ By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Ir i 2017 - No1904257' Packet Page -221-