Agenda 06/28/2011 Item #17B
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are reqnired to be sworn in. PUDZ-PL2009-2496: Emmanuel
Evangelical Lutheran Church - An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land
Development Code, which established the eomprehensive zoning regulations for the unineorporated
area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by
ehanging the zoning elassifieation of the herein deseribed real property from the Estates (E) zoning
distriet to a Community Faeilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district for the
project known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lntheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, to allow 90,000
square feet of uses to include worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and
adult day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation, a 450 person private school; or, in
the alternative, development of single family residential dwelling units, located on tbe south side of
Oil Well Road, in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier Connty, Florida,
consisting of 21.72+/- acres subject to conditions; and by providing an effective date.
OBJECTIVE:
~
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) review staff's findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone
petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in
order to ensure that the eommunity's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERA nONS:
Approval of this projeet will allow development of a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses that
would include worship/chureh and related social services uses, including a 300-person child and
adult day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation services, a 450-student private
school, or in the alternative, development of a maximum of lO single-family residential dwelling
units in compliance with the density and development standards of the Estates zoning district of the
Land Development Code (LDC) and any other Growth Management Plan (GMP) limitations. As
depicted on the PUD Master Plan on page 3 of the ccpe staff report, primary access to the
property would be from Oil Well Road, an east-west roadway that would form the northem
boundary of the property. A possible interconnection is shown to the private roadway on the
westem property boundary.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for puhlie facilities. Additionally, in order
~ to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every loeal development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Packet Page -1784-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance ofa building permit include
building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and other revenue collected were not
included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
The subject property is designated Estates (Estates - Mixed Use District, Mission Subdistrict), as
identified on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Future Land Use Map in the Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Under this designation, the site qualilies for limited institutional uses
as well as low-density residcntial dcvelopment. Comprehensivc Planning Staff has reviewed this
pctition and has found it consistent with thc applicable policies ofthc Futurc Land Use Elcment.
A dctailed analysis of the projcct's consistcncy with the FLUE, and any othcr relevant GMP
Elements is contained in the attached Staff Report.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSlON (CCPC) RECOMMENDATlON:
The CCPC heard this pctition on April 21, 2011, and by 9-0 vote, recommcnded forwarding this
petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval
subject to thc following changes to bc made to thc PUD document:
Exhibit A:
1. Move Gardcn Plot usc in A.5 to an accessory use (B.3) to thc Church and Place of
Worship, but allow thc usc to operate on an interim basis prior to thc construction of the
Church and Place of Worship (as wcll as after).
2. Rcmovc "and similar uses to support the church and their outreach programs" from B.I,
and add the word "and" after thc word "facilitics" and before the word "youth."
Exhibit B:
I. Change thc north Perimeter Setback in Tablc l.A from 25 feet to 75 feet.
2. Add thc word "zoncd" aftcr the word "building" in Minimum Distance Between Principal
Structures in Table I.A.
3. ehange thc Perimetcr Sctback in Table l.B from 25 fect to 75 fcet.
4. Rcmove the General Notc in Tablc l.B.
5. Add an athlctic field lighting limitation to Section F.c. to indicate that lights must be offno
latcr than 9:30 p.m.
6. Add Section G to indicate that the athletic field hours of operation shall be limitcd to 7 a.m.
to 9 p.m.
7. Add Section H that includcs eight limitations for the Garden Plot use, rcgarding its sizc
overall (10% of total propcrty or not more than 2 acrcs) its location on thc site, provision of
sanitary facilities, parking and dcvelopment approval rcquirements.
Exhibit C: The Master Plan was rcvised to add a six-foot high wall along thc eastern and
southern boundarics of the athletic field arca.
Exhibit E: The dcviation was reworded to recognize that a wall would be rcquired to thc east
and south ofthc athletic field (scc Exhibit C changc above).
Thc pctitioner has made these rcvisions to the PUD document that IS included In thc draft
Packet Page -1785-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
ordinance.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This is a site specific rezonc from an Estate (E) Zoning District to a Community Facilities
Planned Unit Developmcnt (CFPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Emmanucl
Evangelical Luthcran Church of Naples, lnc. CFP1ID. The burden falls upon the applicant to
prove that the proposcd rezone is consistent with all the critcria set forth below. Thc burden then
shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to
determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would
be accomplishcd hy finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria
bclow.
Criteria for RPUD Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
I. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of thc land. surrounding areas, traffic
and acccss. drainage, scwer. watcr, and other utilities.
2. Is therc an adcquacy of evidcnce of unificd control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amcndments in those proposed, particularly as
thcy may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
and maintenancc of such areas and facilities that arc not to be provided or maintaincd
at public cxpensc? Findings and remmmendations of this type shall he made only
after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of thc proposed CFPUD with thc goals, objectives and
policics ofthc Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: Thc internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may includc restrictions on location of improvcmcnts, restrictions on
design, and buffering and scrcening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable opcn space areas in cxistence and as proposed to servc
the development?
6. Consider: Thc timing or scqucnce of developmcnt (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of availablc improvcmcnts and facilities, both public and
privatc.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject propcrty and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
Packet Page -1786-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
8. Consider: Conformity with CFPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular casc, based on detcrmination that such modifications
are justified as mccting puhlic purposes to a dcgrce at Icast equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change he consistcnt with the goals, objectives, and policics and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Managcment Plan?
lO. Will the proposcd CFPUD Rczone bc appropriatc considering the existing land use
pattem?
ll. Would the requestcd CFPUD Rezone rcsult in the possible creation of an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundarics arc illogically drawn in rclation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for changc.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions makc the passage of the
proposcd amendmcnt nccessary.
l4. Will the proposed change advcrsely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
l5. Will the proposcd change crcate or exccssively increasc traffic congestion or crcate
types of traffic deemcd incompatible with surrounding land uses, bccausc of peak
volumes or projectcd types of vehicular traffic, inclucling activity during construction
phases ofthc developmcnt, or olhcl1vise affect public safely?
16. Will thc proposed changc crcate a drainagc problem?
l7. Will the proposcd changc seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will thc proposed change advcrscly affect propclty valucs in the adjaccnt area?
19. Will the propos cd change he a dcteJTent to thc improvemcnt or development of
adjacent propelty in accordancc with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whethcr thc proposcd change will constitute a grant ofspedal privilege
to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are therc substantial rcasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") bc used 111
accordance with existing zoning0 (a "corc" question...)
y)
Is the change suggestcd out of scalc with thc nceds of the ncighborhood or the
county?
Packet Page -1787-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposcd use in districts alrcady pcrmitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical charactcristics of the propcrty and the degree of site
alteration which would he rcquired to make the property usable for any of thc range
of potential uscs under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of devclopment resulting from thc proposed CFPUD rezone
on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with thc levels
of service adopted in the Collier County GrO\vth Management Plan and as dcfined
and implementcd through thc Collier County Adequate Public Facilitics Ordinance
[Code ch.l06, art. II] , as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria rclating to the CFPUD rezone request
that the Board of County Commissioners shall decm important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfarc?
The BCC must base its dccision upon the compctcnt, substantial evidcncc prcsented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff RCPOli, Executive
Summary, maps, studics, lettcrs from intercstcd persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as thcse items rclate to thcse critcria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by
the County Attorncy's Otlice. This item has bccn revicwcd for legal sufficicncy and is lcgally
sufficicnt for Board action. An affirmative vote of four is nccessary for Board approval. (STW)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff concurs with thc recommcndations of the CC:PC and further recommcnds that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the rczone request and the attachcd PUD Ordinance that
includcs both the staff rccommcndation and the cepc recommcndation.
PREPARED BY:
Kay Dcselem, A1CP, Principal Planner, Zoning Scrvices Section, Land Development Services
Dcpartmcnt, Growth Managemcnt Division, Planning and Rcgulation
Attachments: 1) Staff Report
2) Application
3) Ordinance
Packet Page -1788-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.B.
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
PUDZ-PL2009-2496: Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church - An ordinance of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as
amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive
zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the
appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein
described real property from the Estates (E) zoning district to a Community Facilities Planned
Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district for the project known as Emmanuel Evangelical
Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc. CFPUD, to allow 90,000 square feet of uses to include
worship/church and related social services, a 300 person child and adult day care facility, job
training and vocational rehabilitation, a 4S0 person private school; or, in the alternative,
development of single family residential dwelling units, located on the south side of Oil Well
Road, in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of
21.72+/- acres subject to conditions; and by providing an effective date.
Meeting Date: 6/28/2011
Prepared By
Name: DcsclemKay
Titlc: Planncr, Principal,Enginecring & Environmcntal Ser
6/6/20 II 12:04: 17 PM
Approved By
Namc: PuigJudy
Tille: Operations Analyst, CDES
Datc: 6/6/20112:47:30 PM
Namc: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services.Compreh~nsive
Datc: 6/7/201l 10:36:33 AM
Name: BcllowsRay
Packet Page -1789-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
Title: Managcr - Planning. Comprchensive Planning
Date: 6/8/20 II ] 2:32:36 PM
Name: FederNorman
Titlc: Administrator - Growth Managemcnt Div,Transportati
Date: 6/9/20] 1 1 :54:46 PM
Namc: WilliamsStcvcn
Title: Assistant County Attorney,County Attorney
Date: 6/13/20] I 9:28:42 AM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executivc Secretary ,Transportation Planning
Datc: 6/16/2011 l:47:41 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorncy,
Date: 6/17/2011 9:l5:l3 AM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 6/20/20ll 10:23:l] AM
Namc: Isackson Mark
Titlc: Dircctor-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Datc: 6/20/20ll 4:0] :25 PM
Packet Page -1790-
Co~'Y County
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
ORIGINAL
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARLNG-FOR:
o AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) [gJ PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
o PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
PUDZ-PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 613/10
DUE: 711/10
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) TOM GEMMER. EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES. INC.
ADDRESS 777 MOORING LINE DRIVE CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34102
TELEPHONE # 239-261-0894 CELL # N/A FAX # 239-261-1802
E-MAIL ADDRESS:ELCANAPLES(1l)EMBARQMIAL.COM
NAME OF AGENT ROBERT L. DUANE. AICP. PLANNING DIRECTOR & RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ.
ADDRESS HOLE MONTES INC, 950 ENCORE WAY CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34110
TELEPHONE # 254-2000 CELL # N/A FAX # 254-2099
E-MAIL ADDRESS(S):BOBDUANE(1l)HMENG.COM.RYOVANOVICH@CYKLAWFIRM.COM
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY
AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_application~llne09 (Revised I00528).doc
Packet Page -1791-
(l)
t-
..--
E
Q)
-
..--
..--
o
N
--
CO
N
--
(!)
eo1M-r County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide
additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's
website at httD:/fwww.collieraov.net/lndex.asDx.?caae=774
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOCIATION
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 990596 CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34116-6002
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised I00528).doc
Co~T County
-~ ~
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
Disclosure of Interest Information
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
percentage of such interest, (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
% of Ownership
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address %of Ownership
Charles Gass IPresident\, 2968 Gardens Boulevard, Naoles. Florida 34105 0%
Robert Pacel (Vice PresidenU, 15260 Cedarwood Lane, A-102, Naoles. Florida 34110 0%
Vivian Shea fTreasurer\, 9909 Clear Lake Circle, Naples, Florida 34109 0%
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_application~une09 (Revised l00528).doc
Packet Page -1793-
~
CoJ.U:r County
-- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of
the general and/or limited partners.
III
I'-
......
E
Q)
.....
......
......
0
N
---
00 e.
N
---
CD
Name and Address % of Ownership
I
,
I
If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contraclterms involve additional parties, list all individuals
or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
H:\2006\2006096\WP"REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,]UD,_PUDZA _application june09 (Revised I00528),doc
Co~r County
- ~ ~
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
g. Date subjed properly acquired t:8J 06/23/06 leased 0 Term .0"1 le~se yrs./mos.
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option: _
Date option terminates: _, or
Anticipated closing date _
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contrads for purchase occur subsequent to
the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the
responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit
a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
PROPERTY LOCATION
Detailed leeal description of the properly covered bv the application: (If space is inadequate. attach on
separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, in~J,!de separate legal description
far property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of Ii recent survey (completed
within the last six months, maximum 1 n to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre-application meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description, If questions arise concerning the
legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range 519/ T48S / R28E
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Properly 1.0. #; 39896040009.39897520007.39897520104. 39897560009.
39897600008.39897600105.39897640000.39897640000.39899120007 and 39899160009
Metes & Bounds Description: Golden Gate Estates Unit 64. Tracts 65A. 80. 80A. 81. 81 A. 96 and 96A,
Size of Dropertv:
ft. x_ ft. = Total Sq. Ft. _ Acres21.72
Address/Clenerallocation of subiect orooerlv: Property is on thc south side orOil Well Road approximate1v l/4
mile west or Everglades Boulevard.
~ .-----
PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): 0 Residential t:8J Community Facilities
o Commercial 0 Industrial
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised l00528),doc
Packet Page -1795-
m
r--
.,.-
E
Ql
-
.,.-
.,.-
o
N
--
en
N
--
<.D
Co~T County
-- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
Zoning La nd Use
N Estates Residential
S Estates Residential
E Aariculture Vacant
W Estates Residential
Does the owner of the subiect property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give
complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate
page),
Section/Township/Range _ / _ / _
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Properly 1.0. #:
Metes & Bounds Description: _
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a rezone from the I;. zoning district{s) to the CFPUD zoning district(s).
Present Use of the Properly: VACANT
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: COMMUNITY FACILITIES/CHURCH
Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: _
H:\2006\2006096\\VP\REZONE (PUO) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,__PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised l00528).doc
eo1.mr County
- ~ ~
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
EV ALUA TION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis ond
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a
narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include
any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.8)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pallern of development proposed in relation to physical
characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other
utilities.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other
instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or
provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that
are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type
shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management
plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested
uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or
other provision.)
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on
location of improvements, restridions on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, bath public and private.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular
case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a
degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,~PUDZA_application.June09 (Revised 100528).doc
Packet Page -1797-
IJJ
I'-
..--
E
<1l
=:
..--
..--
o
N
--
CO
N
--
<D
Co~'Y County
............- ~ --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities
have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for
which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed
restrictions.
Previous land use oetitions on the subied orooertv: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this
property within the last year? [8J Yes 0 No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing? GMP AMENDMENT
Officiallnteroretations or Zonina Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation
or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year~ 0 Yes [gI No
If so, please provide copies.
I
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made
and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered
"closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply
necessarY information to continue processinQ or otherwise activelv pursue the rezonina for a period of
six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application
"closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn, An application deemed "closed" may be re-
opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a
determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project will be subject to the then-current code.
(LDC Section 10.03.05.0.)
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZO!\'E (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,__PUDZA__applicationjune09 (Revised J00528).doc
eo1N:r County
- ......~- --
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) TOM GEMMER. DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
ADDRESS EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES. 777 MOORING LINE DRIVE CITY
NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34102
TELEPHONE # 239-261-0894 CELL # N/A FAX # 239-261-1802
E-MAIL ADDRESS:ELCANAPLES@EM8ARQMAIL.COM
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF A V AILABLE): ProDertv is on the south side of Oil Well Road
ODDroximatelv 1/4 mile west of Everalades Boulevard.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section/Township/Range S19/ T48S / R28E
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Properly 1.0. #: 39896040009.39897520007.39897520104.39897560009.
39897600008,39897600105.39897640000.39897640000.39899120007 and 39899160009
Metes & Bounds Description: Golden Gate Estates Unit 64, Tracts 65A. 80. 80A, 81. 81 A. 96 and 96A,
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
(Check applicable system):
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
c, PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPO capacity) (15.000 GPO)
d, SEPTIC SYSTEM
o
o
~
o
NOTE: At this time, the site is not within a utility service area. If the possibility of utility service exits at
the time of site development, then it will be explored.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,~PUD,__PUDZA _ applicationjune09 (Revised 100528).doc
Packet Page -1799-
co
I'-
..-
E
QJ
~
..-
..-
o
N
--
ex>
N
--
CD
Co~r County
-- ............... --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
o. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM D
b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM D
c, FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM D
PROVIDE NAME
d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) [8J
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: The maximum flow will occur durina a weekday based
on the DroDosed school: 750 students + 70 staff (church & school) = 820 DeoDle x 15 GPPD =
12.300 aol.. (sav 12.500 GPO).
PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A. WATER-PEAK 15.000 aDd AVERAGE DAILY 12.500 aDd
B. SEWER-PEAK 15.000 apd AVERAGE DAILY 12.500 apd
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE
PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO 8E REQUIRED N/A
NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide 0 brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing
of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of
affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil
involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer.
Response: Wastewater treatment will be provided by an onsife plant. Effluent will be disposed of
through a disposal field. Sludge will be removed from the plant and hauled to a licensed disposal
facility,
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services
boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided
agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection
facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance
with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an
agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the
County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the
statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for
serving the water and sewer systems.
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or
otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable
water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating
that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
H:\2006"1006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,__Pt:OZA_applicationjune09 (Revised J0052S).doc
~~un~
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
. ORIGINAL
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
OEm. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
AFFIDAVIT
We/I, Tom Gemmer and Chorle. Go" being first duly sworn, depose and .oy that we/I am/ore the
owner> of 1I1e property de.cribed herein and which \. the subiect matter of the proposed hearing; that
011 the answer> to 1I1e question. in 1I1i. application, Including the disclosure of interest information, 011
sketches, data, ond other supplementary matter attoched to and mode 0 port of this application, ore
honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the Information
requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether
computer generated or County printed sholl not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until
this application is deemed complete, and 011 required information has been submitted.
As property owner We/I further authorize Robert L Duane. A.I.C.P.. Plannine Director ans! Richard
Yovanovich. Esaulre to act as our/my representative In any matter> regordin\;rthis~Petiti';n.
~~!A
/;~~l\",j-)-'----
" .r--J
~€l1li~(Ov]~, p~U
Signature of Property Owner '
Signature of Property Owner
Tom Gemmer. Parish Administrator
Emmanuel Lutheran Church of Naoles. Inc.
Charles Gass, President
Emmanuel Lutheran Church of Naples. Inc.
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
, 'z 41
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this~7 day 0 ,J1;y'V-. ~Ql-'1L~~
by Tom Gemmer. Pari,h Administrator ond Charles Go... President who are~orlcTIYknown to me /)
or. s produced n as identifi<:~tlon. ~ ',.. . ~ ~ /
L /; ( ,. 1'- ~
" . ,.. '. ~.. -, . - ........
I' . , . - .-/
)! ) I. " h I I (
; , '. JLLt"^---0 ! iU~ ,dLLz, : -}fHJ
(SignaW~,'~ of Nota1public - State of
I I I
fJoridgJ i~~ JACQUEliNE SILANO
f~' \J. MY COMMISSION # DD 951302
( P. T S ' , '. "'. - UP,MiES: February 22, 2014
nnt, ype, Or tamp' OF ;, 18l.8I~hruNotaryP~blitUnderwrilen;
Name of Notary Pub "",..'
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,]UD,_PUDZA_appIication..Juac09 lOO421.doc
Packet Page -1801-
OJ
I'-
.,-
E
OJ
....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
en
N
--
to
~un~
t""R"G'NA!
~."J ~. _, I k
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA-34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643.6968
COVENANT OF UNIF1ED CONTROL
The und&signed do bereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titlebolders and owners of record of property
commonly lmown as EMMANUAL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF NAPLES, INC" 777 MOORING
LINE DRIVE. NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101
(Street address and City, State and Zip Code)
and legally described in Exhibit A attached berelD.
The propcrty described berein is the subject of an application for COMMUNITY FACILITIES planned unit
development (CFPUD) zoning. We hereby designate RICHARD YOV ANOVlCH. ESOUIRE. legal representative
thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individoals are authorized to legally bind an owners
of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvsls lD develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to,
tho hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans. surveys, and studir:s necessary to
obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity lD authorize development activity on
the property until such tinre as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in lhe pursuit of development of ,the project:
1. The property will be developed and U<ed in confonnity with the approved master plan incluiliilg-a1l.conditiOtlS placed
on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection wilhtbe planned unit development
rezoning.
2. The legal represeDllltive identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and
stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in
part, unless and until a new or amended covenant ofu:nified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a fiulure to comply with any requirements, conditions. or
safegnards provided for in the planned unit development process will constiDttt a violation of the Land Development
Code,
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval v.ill be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners thai: all development activity within
the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions.
5. So long as this COVOIUUlt is in force! Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms.,
safeguards, and conditions of the plannod unit development, seek equitable reuef as necessary to compel compliance.
The County will not issue permitsJ cenificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development
and the C, ounly may sto, P on.going constmction activity UDb' the <>je.ct is b",ro, Ug,ht, \Dto com,plian, ce with all terms,
~~tiOtlS ~d safeguards of the planned unit development. ~,I. ;I ",)'q
/ /....Lj~__ , /.{'~L(Jj( M-4 i P/u2<1
Owner Owner'
Tom Genuner, Parish Administrator, Charles Gass, President
Emrnannel Lutheran Church ofNavles.lnc. Emmanuel Lutheran Church ofNanles.Inc.
Printed Name PrintlXl Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
I
COUNTY OF COLLIER) , ,1_l____ /, 1
Sworn lD (or affirmed) and subscribed before me thiS... '/' day,of I i:,,?1/LU; 2010 by Tom Gemmer. Parisb
Administrator and Charles Gass. Presidenl who are oerilonallv kDo~-to:me or h~ produced ) __ as
identification. --, ," ,: ,----1 / i' ~
. "_'-o./'Clt~1 '.-.LC'v--l-v:s"<--.1{.l._J'1--Q
SEAL NO\aryPlll>1ic - State of Florida
(N,kne iypi,d, printed,fu stamped)
, /
,
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,]UD,_PUDZA _applic.ation June09 l00421.d~
...~Io;;;..,"', J~CQU8JNE Sl~ ,I,iSl;;,
f:f" .'tl lJ,Y COMMISSION # DO 951~'.::;\":,:.:
;,.... :'<: EXPIRES: February 22, 2014
<'~i"r;~"~'" Banded Thru Notary Public UlIderNrlters
t.....f.i
eo1M-r County
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS)
A TIS is required unless waived at the pre-application meeting. The TIS required may be either a major or
minor as determined at the pre-application meeting, Please note the following with r~gard to TIS
submittals:
MINOR TIS: Generally required for rezone requests for property less than 10 acres in size, although
based on the intensity or unique character of a petition, a major TIS may be required for petition of ten
acres or less.
MAJOR TIS: Required for all other rezone requests.
A minor TIS shall include the following:
1.
Trip Generation:
(at build-out)
Annual Average Daily Traffic
Peak Hour IAADT)
Peak Season Daily Traffic
Peak Hour (PSDT)
2,
T rip Assignment:
Within Radius of Development Influence (RDI)
3. Existing Traffic: Within RDI
AADT Volumes
PSDT Volumes
Level of Service (LOS)
4, Impact of the proposed use on affected major thoroughfares, including any anticipated changes in
level of service (LOS).
5. Any proposed improvements (to the site or the external right-of-way) such as providing or
eliminating an ingress/egress point, or providing turn or Decal lanes or other improvements.
6. Describe any proposal to mitigate the negative impacts on the transportation system.
7. For Rezones. Only: State how this request is consistent with the applicable policies of the Traffic
Circulation Element(TCE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), including policies 1 .3, 1.4, 4.4,
5.1,5.2, 7.2 and 7.3.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_ PUD,_PUDZA _ application.June09 (Revised 1 00528).doc. '"
Packet Page -1803-
CD
I'-
..-
E
Q)
-
..-
..-
o
N
--
CO
N
--
<D
ColMr County
-- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
A Major TIS shall address all of the items listed above
analysis of the following:
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
(for a Minor TIS, and shall also include an
1. Intersection Analysis
2, Backg round Traffic
3, Future Traffic
4. Through Traffic
5. Planned/Proposed Roadway Improvements
6. Proposed Schedule (Phasing) of Development
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS) STANDARDS
The following standards shall be used in preparing a TIS for submillal in conjunction with a conditional use
or rezone petition:
I. Trip Generation: Provide the total traffic generated by the project for each link within the project's
Radius of Development Influence (RDI) in conformance with the acceptable traffic engineering
principles. The rates published in the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Report shall be used unless documentation by the petitioner or the County justifies the use
of a lternative rates.
2. Trip Assianment: Provide a map depicting the assignment to the network, of those trips generated by
the proposed project. The assignment shall be made to all links within the RDI. Both annual average and
peak seasonal traffic should be depicted.
3. Existina Traffic: Provide a map depicting the current traffic conditions on all links within the RDI. The
AADT, PSDT, and LOS shall be depicted for all links within the RDI.
4. Level of Service (LOS): The LOS of a roadway shall be expressed in terms of the applicable Collier
County Generalized Daily Service Volumes as set forth in the TCE of the GMP,
5. Radius of Development Influence (ROil: The TIS shall cover the least of the following two areas:
0) an area as set forth below; or,
b) the area in which traffic assignments from the proposed project on the major thoroughfares
exceeds one percent of the LOS "e",
H:\2006\2006096\WP\R.EZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised I00528).doc
Co~r County
- ~ -
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
land Use
Residential
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
Distance
5 Miles or as required by DRI
Other (commercial, industriol, institutional, etc.)
o - 49, 999 Sq. Fl. 2 Miles
50,000 - 99,999 Sq, Ft. 3 Miles
100,000 - 199, 999 Sq. Ft. 4 Miles
200,000 - 399, 999 Sq. Ft 5 Miles
400,000 & up 5 Miles
In describing the RDI the TIS shall provide the measurement in rood miles from the proposed project
rather than a geometric rod ius.
6. Intersection Analvsis: An intersection analysis is required for all intersections within the RDI where the
sum of the peak-hour critical lane volume is projected to exceed 1,200 Vehicles Per Hour (VPH).
7. Backaround Traffic: The effects of previously approved but undeveioped or partially developed
projects which may affect major thoroughfares within the RDI of the proposed project shall be
provided. This information shall be depicted on a map or, alternatively; in a listing of those projects
and their respective characteristics.
8. Future Traffic: An estimate of the effects of traditional increases in traffic resulting from potential
development shall be provided. Potential development is that which may be developed maximally
under the effective Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Collier County Land Development Code.
This estimate shall be for the projected development areas within the projects RDI. A map or list of such
lands with potential traffic impact calculations shall be provided.
9. Throuah Traffic: At a minimum, increases in through traffic shall be addressed through the year 2015.
The methodology used to derive the estimates shall be provided. It may be desirable to include any
additional documentation and backup data to support the estimation as well,
10. Planned/Proposed Roadwav Improvements: All proposed or planned roadway improvements
located within the RDI should be identified. A description of the funding commitments shall also be
included.
11. Proiect Phasina: When a project phasing schedule is dependent upon proposed roadway
improvements, a phasing scheduie may be included as part of the TIS. If the, traffic impacts of a project
are mitigated through a phasing schedule, such a phasing schedule may,be"made a condition of any
approval.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_ application june09 (Revised l00528).doc
Packet Page -1805-
Co~'Y County
- ~-- --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUD REZONE APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
co
r--
..- GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
E Application information must be clearly printed or typed. All material must be legible and completed in
a>
~ full. All requirements must be submitted as indicated below, unless otherwise determined during the pre-
"t'"- application meeting.
..-
o
~ GENERAL APPLICATION
CO
N To be completed in full and to include the following information,
--
<.0
PUD list of permitted uses
Development Standards T abie
List of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any)
List of Developer Commitments
Refer to LDC Section 1 0.02.13.A.2 for required information
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES WITH THE ADDRESSING CHECKLIST FORM
Provide copies of notes taken at pre-application meeting
DIGIT AL REQUIREMENTS
An electronic version of all plans and documents on CD ROM as part of the submittal package.
FEES
Required fees in accordance with current Fee Schedule. Check shall be made payable to: Collier County
Board of Commissioners.
Application Fee
~ PUD Rezone = $10,000 + $25 per acre
~ PUD to PUD Rezone = $8,000 + $25 per acre
Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review = $2,250
Legal Advertising Fees
~ BeC = $500
~ CCPC = $925
Fire Code Review = $150/$100 for PUDZ-A
"IS Re :ie'" - $2,500
Note: An additional fee for the 51h and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20%'of the original fee.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZOl\'E (PL'D) 2009\PUDA, ~ PUD,_PUDZA _application june09 (Revised I00528).doc
eolMr County
- ~ -
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), es required by Section 1 0.02.02. of the land Development Code
(LDC) , or a request for waiver if appropriate.
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
AERIAL PHOTO
Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous
twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted, Said aerial shall identify
plont and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with Florida
Department of Transportation land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionally, a calculation
of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation and location(s) of
the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per lDC Section 3.05,07).
BOUNDARY SURVEY
Boundary Survey, no more than six months old, abstracted, signed, sealed and prepared by a Florida
registered land surveyor, showing the location and dimensions of all property lines, existing streets or
roods, easements, rights-of-way, and arees dedicated to the public.
HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
A historical and archeological surveyor waiver application if property is located within an area of
historical or archaeological probability (os identified at pre-application meeting)
PUD MASTER PLAN
In compliance with Section 1 0.02.13.A.l of the land Development Code.
OWNER/AGENT AFFIDAVIT
Affidavit signed by owner authorizing agent to oct os representative. Must be signed and notarized.
WARRANTY DEED
A copy of the lost recorded deed, contract for sole or agreement for sole, or a ~a!arized st",tement of
ownership clearly demonstrating ownership and control of the subiect lot or parcel efland.
ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING
Architectural rendering of any proposed structures
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT (TIS)
Unless waived at the pre-application meetingl a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) must be submitted. Please refer to
attached TIS standards.
UTILITY PROVISIONS STATEMENT
A copy of the Utility Provisions Statement with required attachments and sketches. Please refer to attached
form.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT
Including 011 Appendices and Exhibits
H:\2006\2006096\ WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_ PUD,_PUDZA _application june09 (Revised l00528).doc
Packet Page -1807-
ro
I"-
.,....
E
C!l
-
.,....
.,....
o
N
-...
0Cl
N
-...
CD
Co~'Y County
~ ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
PERMITS
Copies of Stote and/or Federal permits
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goo Is, obiectives and policies of the growth management plan.
(This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density,
ond fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that sub-district, policy or other provision.)
NEIGHBORHOOR INFORMATIONAL MEETING (NIMl
Required per LDC Section 1 O.03.05,E. Please see attachment for requirements.
OTHER
Any additional requirements as moy be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the
pre-application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits,
CONTINUANCE FEES
In accordance with Collier County Community Development and Environmental ,Services Fee Schedule, when
land use petitions are continued, the following fees will apply:
Requested after petition has been advertised = $500
Requested at the meeting = $750
Additional required advertising charged in addition to continuance fees
BE ADVISED THAT SECTION 10.03.05.B,3 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES AN APPLICANT TO
REMOVE THEIR PUBLIC HEARING SIGN (S) AFTER FINAL ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS. BASED ON THE BOARD'S FINAL ACTION ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE REMOVE ALL PUBLIC
HEARING ADVERTISING SIGN(S) IMMEDIATELY.
H:"2Q06\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA__ PUD,__ PUDZA_application june09 (Revised 100528).doc
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
Co~r County
- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING
LOC Section 10.03.05.E '"
Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informotional Meeting (NIM) after initial stoff review and
comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission.
Written notice of the meeting shell be sent to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification from
the County pursuant to Section lO.03.05.B.8.
Notification sholl also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted
by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified.
A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the
Zoning Deportment and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less thon ten (10) days prior to the
scheduled date of the NIM.
The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably convenient
to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to
accommodate expected attendance.
The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and
classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and leg,ble site location map of
the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one~fourth page, in
type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within 0 newspaper of general circulation in the County at least
seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM.
The Coilier County stoff planner assigned to the proiect must attend the NIM and sholl serve os the facilitator of the
meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subiect
property.
The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the Zoning
Department.
As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to
writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning Department. These written
commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and mode a part
of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,]UD,~PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised l00528).doc
Packet Page -1809-
ClJ
f'-
.,....
E
(])
......
.,....
.,....
o
N
-...
CO
N
-...
CD
Co~r County
-- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at its expense shall record in
the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of
Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition
and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum
or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter
695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit
Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PlJD) 2009\PUDA,_PlJD,_PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised I00528).doc
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
Co1Mr County
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA) - PUD REZONE (PUDZ) - PUD to PUD REZONE [PUDZ-A)
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER liSTED BELOW
WjCOVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMIlITTALS Will NOT BE ACCEPTED.
REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT
COPIES REQUIRED REQUIREt
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS,< .....< ....... ... . .. ....... ..i .. .....
1 Additional set if located in the Bavshore/Gateway Trianale Redevelopment Area)
Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessory 24 [gJ 0
Completed Application with list of Permitted Usesj Development Standards Tobie; List of 24 [gJ U
proposed deviations from the lDC (if any); List of Developer Commitments and
Statement of Compliance narrative (download application from web for current form)
Pre-application meeting notes 24 [gJ. 0
PUD Conceptual Moster Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 V::i." x 11" CODY 24 Ix' 0
Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 V2" x 11" COPY 24 0 [8J
Original PUD doc/ord and Ma,t.r Plan 24" x 36" - ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD 24 0 [8J
Revised PUD application with chances crossed thru & underlined 24 0 [8J
Revised PUD application w lamended Title page w lord #'5, LDC 1 Q,Q2.13.A.2 24 0 [8J
Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on 0 separate sheet within the 24 0 0
application material; please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents)
Copies of the following: . .. ... . -:- . ...., . .... ., ....
Deeds/Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 3 -g 0
List identifying Owner & 011 parties of corporation 2 [8J 0
Owner/Affidavit signed & notarized 2 [8J U
Covenant of Unified Control 2 [8J 0
Completed Addressing checklist 2 [8J 0
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and el.i~ita'/eleetreR'e eSJ3) af EIS or exemotion 2 [8J 0
Justification
Historical Surveyor waiver request 4 [8J 0
Utility Provisions Statement 4 [8J 0
Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 0 [8J
Survey, signed & sealed 4 [8J 0
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver (with applicable fees) 3 [8J 0
Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1 "_400' S. [8J 0
Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or Diskette) 1 [8J 0
Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 0 i:8J
If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivina Land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Locavero, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690~3500 for information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.0B.A.2.a.{b)i.c.
~ {)c~~
4liS( 10
Oat. I
,A f3fSliea"lt/ Agent Signature
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,]UD,_PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised I00528).doc
Packet Page -1811-
co
I'-
..-
E
Q)
-
..-
..-
o
N
--
OJ
N
--
<D
Co~'Y County
~--
-- - -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
EXHIBIT A
PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
1. PLEASE SEE THE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT "A" - PERMITTED USES.
Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list ofpermitted
principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process
outlined in the LDC.
B.
Accessory Uses:
1. PLEASE SEE THE A TT ACHED EXlllBIT "A" - PERMITTED USES.
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses
and structures, including, but not limited to:
CONDITIONAL USES (Optional)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses
within the (type ofPOO) POO Residential Subdistrict. Standards not
specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable
sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or
Subdivision plat.
PLEASE SEE THE A TT ACHED EXHIBIT "B" - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_ PUDZA _application June09 (Revised ] 00528),doc
Co~'Y County
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
EXHIBIT B
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY TWO-FAMILY, MULTI- CLUBHOUSE/
ATTACHED & PATIO & FAMILY RECREATION
TOWNHOUSE ZERO LOT LINE BUILDINGS
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F. PER S.F. PER S.F. PER S.F. PER S.F. PER
UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA S.F S.F S.F S.F./D.U. N/A
MIN FRONT YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A
MIN SIDE YARD FEET FEET or FEET or FEET N/A
MIN REAR YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A
MIN PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN FEET FEET FEET FEET or N/A
STRUCTURES BH,
whichever is
greater --
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT FEET FEET FEET FEET _ FEET
TO EXCEED
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
FRONT FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
SIDE FEET FEET FEET FEET BH
REAR FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
DISTANCE BETWEEN
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT SPS SPS SPS FEET
TO EX CEED FEET
S.P.S. ~ Same as Principal Structures
BE ~ Building Height
Footnotes as needed
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE CPUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_application.June09 (Revised l00528),doc.
Packet Page -1813-
co
r--
..-
E
Q)
-
..-
..-
o
N
"-
CO
N
"-
CD
C~r County
- ~ ~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to
individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or betv/een structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association
boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards.
Setback may be either feet ( ) on one side and feet ( ) on the other side in order to provide a
minimum separation between principal structures of feet ( ). Alternatively, if the foot ( )
setback option is not utilized, then the minimwn setback shall not be less than feet ( ) and the combined
setback between principal structures shall be at least feet ( ). At the time of the application for
subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimwn yard setbacks and the building footprint shall
be submitted.
TABLE II
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES
MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq.Ft. N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH Ft. N/A
I MINIMUM YARDS (External)
I
From Irnmokalee Road Canal ROW Ft. SPS
From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. Ft. SPS
From Western Project Boundary Ft. Ft.
,
MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) I
I
Internal Drives/ROW Ft. Ft.
Rear I Ft. Ft.
-
Side I Ft. Ft.
i
I -
ML"l. DISTANCE BETWEEN Ft. or sum of I Ft.
STRUCTURES Building heivhts *
MAXIMUM HEIGHT
Retail Buildings Ft. Ft.
Office Buildings Ft. Ft.
MIl\'IMUM FLOOR AREA Sq. Ft. ** N/A
MAX. GROSS LEASABLE AREA Sq. Ft. K/A
* whichever is greater
** per principal structure, on the fmishcd first floor.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_ PUD,__PUDZA _ application ~une09 (Revised 100528).doc
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
Co~r CoUl1ty
- ~ ~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-240_0 FAX (239) 643-6968
EXHIBIT C
MASTER PLAN
PLEASE SEE THE A TT ACHED CFPUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT "c"
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_PUDZA_application~une09 (Revised I00528).doc
Packet Page -1815-
co
t--
..-
E
<1l
~
..-
..-
o
N
--
CO
N
--
to
C~r County
- ......~- --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLlIERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(If legal description is too long, add as an attachment)
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "D" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION & WARRANTY DEED
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,__PUD,_ PuDZA _application june09 (Revised I00528).doc
Co~T County
- ~ --
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "E" - LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC
H:\2006\2006096\ WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,_ PUDZA _application --.iune09 (Revised l00528).doc
Packet Page -1817-
co
r-..
.,...
E
Q)
~
.,...
.,...
o
N
--
CO
N
--
<.D
C~T County
- ......~- --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMITMENTS
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "F" - LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\PUDA,_PUD,~PUDZA_applicationjune09 (Revised l00528).doc
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
PUDZ-PL21
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHUK'-n
DATE: 613110
DUE: 711110
ADDENDUM
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES pUD
pUD REWKE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION lO.02.13:B)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of dcvelopment proposed in relation to
physical characteristics ofthe land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Narrative Statement:
The surrounding area is zoned "E" Estates with sporadic residential development
around the boundaries of the subject property to the north, west and south. Lands to
the ease are vacant and zoned for agricultural use. The characteristics of the land is
that it has been previously cleared not unlike surrounding Estates zoned properites.
The subject property proposes to have access to Oil Well Road that is proposed to be
widened this year.
The sewer and water will ultimately be provided by Collier County or if service is not
readily available, sewer and water service will be provided by an on-site water and
wastewater system.
Drainage facilities and other infrastructure can readily accomm6lfate the proposed
rezoning request and subsequent development of the property.
The area is, therefore, suitable for the proposed rezoning request from "E" Estates to
the Community Facility Planned Unit Zoning District based on the characteristics of
the land and compliance with other crueru. set forth below.
2. Adequacy of evidcnce of unified control and suitability of any proposed agrecmcnts, contract, or
othcr instruments, or for amendmcnts in those proposed, particularly as they may rclate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing opcration and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
rccommcndations of this typc shall be made only after consultation with thc County Attorncy.
H,\2006\2006096\\VPIREZONE (PUD) 2009\ADDENDUM TO EVALUATION CRITERIA IO0521.doc
Pagelof5
Packet Page -1819-
3.
m
I'-
.....
E
Q)
.....
.....
.....
0
N
--
co
N
-.
ill
ATarrative Statement:
The subject property is under Unified Control for the purpose of filing this rezoning
request and as further evidenced by the Statement of Unified Control included in the
Rezoning Application.
Conformity of thc proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the grOVl'th
management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other
provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or
conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.)
Narrative Statement:
The proposed rezoning request is consistent with the provisions of the Mission
Subdistrict that has been forwarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs by
the Board of County Commissioners with the final adoption hearing scheduled later this
year. The Mission Subdistrict will provide up to 90,000 S.F. of church and related
support services including child care services; day care centers; private schools, activity
centers, elderly handicapped only, adult and handicapped only, and recreational
facilities and medical outreach to the community; and individual and family social
serviccs not for profit affiliated with the church. 171ese permitted uses are incorporated
into Exhibit A - Permitted Uses within the allowable 90,000 S.F., and the maximum
zoned building heights cannot exceed 30 feet for uses other than the Worship Center
and 35 feet for the Worship Center. Therefore, pending final adoption of the Mission
Subdistrict, the proposed rezoning request can be found consistent with the provisions
of the Mission Subdistrict to address the Growth Management Plan Compliance.
Further consistency with the GMP can be established as set forth as follows:
Policy 1.2 of the Economic Element of the GMP notes that "Collier County will support
the opportunity for development and establishment of hospitals, nursing homes and
additional medical related facilities in order to promote a continuum of care to enhance
the qllality of life throughout the County." With the individual and family social
services component of the project that includes activity centqs. jor elderly and
handicapped including medical outreach to the community, compliance with the
aforemcntioned Policy can be met
Policy 1.4 of the Economic Element of the GMP notes that "Collier County will
cooperate with State agencies and other social service providers to encourage the
establishment of programs and facilities that assist the eldcrly population of the
County. "
The proposed uses in this PUlJ will help achieve this goal as noted.
Objective No.7 of the GMP sets forth Policy 7,] of the FLUE notes that "the County
shall encourage Developers and property owners to connect their property to ft'onting
H;'2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\ADDENDU1vt TO EVALUA TIQN CRITERIA 100521.doc
Page 2 of5
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can. be made without
violating intersection spacing requirements of the LDC. " '.
The subject property will comply with this policy by connecting with Oil Well Road.
Objective No. 7 of the GMP sets forth Policy 7.2 of the FLUE notes that "the County
shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic
signals. "
The subject property proposes direct access to Oil Well Road to minimize the need for
traffic signals to comply with the Policy.
Objective No. 7 of the GMP sets forth Policy 7.3 of the FLUE notes that "all new and
existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless
of land use type.
The subject property development does not propose to interconnect with adjacent
properties. The dirt road to the north of the subject property is a private roa~way
easement that the subject property does not have the right to use. Lands to the sc;;'th of
the subject property are zoned with Estates zoned lots and platteirand are not suitable
for interconnection. Lands to the east are vacant and zoned for Agricultural use and no
interconnection is provided to this property. Access to the church from the property to
the east can be readily accessed to the subject property from a sidewalk planned along
Oil Well Road. Existing conditions, therefore, do not make interconnections feasible at
this location.
Objective No.7 of the GMP sets forth Policy 7,5 of the FLUE notes that "the County
shall encourage mixed use development within the same buildings by allowing
residential dwelling units over andlor abutting commercial development This Policy
shall be implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in the Growth
Management Plan."
This Policy is not generally applicable to the proposed rezoning request, although the
project does include a mix of uses (See Exhibit A - Permitted Uses).
Objective No. 7 of the GMP sets forth Policy 7. 6 of the FLUE notes that "the County
shall explore the creation of an w'ban "greenway" network along existing major canal
banks and powerline easements. .
The subject property includes no major canal banks and powerline easements, so this
Policy is not applicable to the proposed development
H:\2006\2006096\WPIREZONE (PUD) 2009IADDENDUM TO EV ALUA nON CRITERIA I00521.doo
Page3of5
Packet Page -1821-
co
I"-
......
E
ClJ
~
......
......
0 5.
N
--
co
N
--
CD
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed CFPUD Master Plan provides setbacks 75 feet in width along the south,
east and west property line, however, play fields are permitted within the westerly most
buffer as depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan. The landscape buffers proposed are 25
feet in width and are Type "B" buffers along the east, west and south property lines and
a Type "D" buffer along Oil Well Road also 25 feet in width. These Development
Standards with a limitation of 30 feet of zoned height for all structures except for the
Worship Center that is permitted a maximum zoned height of 35 feet and limitations on
uses are designed to promote internal and external compatibility.
The adequacy of usable opcn space areas in existence and as proposed to scrve the
development.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed development depicts extensive open space areas that significantly exceed
the minimum 30 percent open space required for this PUD and will also be available to
meet the recreational needs of the site that enhances the functionality of open space
areas (See also CFPUD Master Plan).
6. Thc timing or sequence of dcvelopment for thc purpose of assuring. the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed development will coincide well with the widening of Oil Well Road
planned to be in place when the development commences. Public facilities will be
available to support the needs of the proposed development including EMS, law
enforcement and fire. No private facilities are anticipated to serve the proposed
development. Compliance with this criteria can be met based on the foregoing,
7. The ability of the subject propcrty and of surrounding areas to aecommodatc cxpansion.
Narrative Statement:
The subject property through the review of the GAfP Amendment has been determined
to be suitable for the proposed location and will also contribute to meeting the
continuing needs of the Estates as residential development builds out over time.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\ADDENDUM TO EV ALUA TJON CRITERiA l00521,doc:
Page 4 of 5
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed development can be found to be consistent with the PUD regulations
contained in the LDC and a determination can be made that the subject development
proposes to a degree or at least equivalent to a literal application of such regulations.
One deviation is proposed to the LDC so as not to require a fence or wall around the
subject property adjacent to residentially zoned properties.
.<::: "
H:'2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\ADDENDUM TO EVALUATION CRITERIA I00521.doc
Page5of5
Packet Page -1823-
co
I'-
.,....
E
(])
-
.,....
.,....
o
N
--
ex)
N
--
<D
PUDZ-PLZ009-Z496 REV:l
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 6/3110
DUE: 7/1/10
REZONING CRITERIA
COMPLIANT WITH LDC SECTION 10.03.05 I.
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES pUD
10.03.05 I. Nature of requirements of planning commission report. When pertaining to the
rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the planning commission to the board
of count)' commissioners required in 10.02.12 D. shall show that the planning commission
has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, when
applicable:
1.
Whether the proposcd change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and futurc land use map and the elcments of the growth managemcnt plan.
The proposed request to rezone the property from "E" Estates to a Community Facility
Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) is consistent with the provisions of the proposed
Mission Subdistrict, pending as the date of this submittal and awaiting the final
adoption hearing later this year. The Petition can also be found consistent with other
goals and provisions of the GillP as set forth in the PUD Rezone Consideration of
(LDC Section 10.02.13. B) as continued in this Rezoning Application.
2. Thc existing land use pattcrn.
The existing land use pattern are lands spo1'Qdically developed with single family
residential land use uses zoned for Estates on lots generally developed with one
dwelling unit on 2 J4 aC/'es to the southwest, and north of the property, Lands to the
east are vacant and agricultural zoned. At the time of the Application and review of
the GMP Amendment for the Mission Subdistrict, the proposed use of a church and
related uses was found to be suitable at this location based on existing land use
patterns and other planning considerations.
3. The possible creation of an isolatcd district unrclatcd to adjacent and nearby districts.
The subject property based on the current review of the Mission Subdistrict was
deemed to be a suitable land use to meet future needs of the Estates and will not result
in an isolated District unrelated to adjacent and nearby land uses,
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The proposed zoning district boundary is drawn to coincide with the boundalY of the
lWission Subdistrict on the Future Land Use map in relation to existing conditions on
the property.
H:\2006\2006096\WP'.J{FZONE (PUD) 2009\REZONiNG CRITERlA J00521.doc
Pagelof4
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendmcnt
neccssary.
Based on a review of the proposed Mission Subdistrict, there was a demonstrated need
for a church and related uses to meet the expanding needs of the Estates future
population growth. The expanding needs of the Estates population represents the
changed condition.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions based on the
proposed development standards including limitation on building heights of 30 feet and
the proposed screening, buffering and setbacks.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, bccause of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the dcvclopment, or otherwise affect public safety.
Based on the results of the T.I.S., the widening of Oil Well Road will provide sufficient
capacity for the project without excessively increasing traffic congestion or generate
types of traffic that cannot be readily accommodated by the expansion of the road
network.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed change in use can be readily accommodated by the proposed water
management system. The review of the proposed storm water management system by
the South Florida Water Management District will further insure that water
management can be readily accommodated, -'
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjaccnt areas.
With the proposed developmmt standards and limitations on height and setbacks
depicted 011 the PUD Master Plan, the proposed change will not seriously reduce light
andlor air to adjacent areas.
10. Whethcr the proposed change will adversely affect property valucs in the adjacent arca.
It is not anticipated that the proposed use for a church and related facilities with the
proposed development standards that the uses will adversely affect property values in
the general area.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\REZONING CRITERIA lD0521.doc
Page 2 of 4
Packet Page -1825-
11. Vv'hethcr the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjaecnt property in accordance with existing regulations.
12.
CD
I"-
.,...
E
Q)
-
.,...
.,... 13.
0
N
--
ex)
N
--
<0
The proposed change in use will not be a detriment to the improvement or development
of adjacent properties based on the proposed development standards.
Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed change in use will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare as the proposed change in use
will be consistent with the provisions of the Mission Subdistrict in the GMP upon its
adoption.
Whether thcre are substantial reasons why thc property cannot be uscd in accordancc
with existing zoning.
Based on amendments to the GMP to allow for the Mission Subdistrict along with the
need to meet the expanding needs of the Estates future population growth, the existing
zoning will not accommodate a church and related uses. This condition supporls the
need for the zoning change.
14. Whether the change suggcsted is out of scalc with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
The proposed change in use to allow for up to 90,000 S.F., for church related uses on
22,", acres is not out of scale with the neighborhood or the County as there is a
demonstrated needfor the proposed uses based on review of the GMP Amendment.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adcquate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already pcrmitting such use.
Based on the limitations for non-residential uses and churches in the Golden Gate
Master Plan, there are very limited opportunities for sites available for these uses for a
site of over 20 acres, This was the basis in part for the favorable review of the Mission
Subdistrct at this point in time to allow the subject property to meet the needs of the
expanding Estates population at this location.
16. Thc physical charactcristics of the propelty and the degree of site alteration which would
bc required to make thc propcrty usablc for any of thc range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
The site has been previously cleared and altered by the development of the Estates
Subdivision, allowing it to readily accommodate the proposed change in use.
H:\2006\2006096\\\'P\REZONE (PUD) 2D09\REZONING CRITERIA IQQ521.doc
Page 3 of4
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Conier County growth management
plan and as dcfined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended.
Transportation facilities with the widening of Oil Well R()ild- are adequate to
accommodate the needs of the proposed development. However, sewer and water
facilities will need to be extended to the site to provide for future utility service or an
on-site water and sewage treatment plant will be constructed if sewer and water service
is not readily available from the County. Other public and private facilities, including
EMS and fire protection are adequate to meet the future needs of the site based on
current available data.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
Such other factors will be consistent with the time of rezoning approval by the Board of
County Commissioners as deemed necessalY for future protection of the public safety,
health and welfare.
H:\200612006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\R.EZONING CRfrERIA ] 00521.doc
Page 4 of 4
Packet Page -1827-
ClJ
I'-
...-
E
QJ
~
...-
...-
o
('oJ
--
CXl
('oJ
--
CD
MISSION SUBDISTRICT
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD
Petition CP-2007-3, Mission Subdistrict
2. ESTATES DESIGNATION
A. Estates-Mixed Use District
2. Mission Subdistrict
The Mission Subdistrict includes the following language incorporated into the application:
The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one-quarter
mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21. 72 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict
is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The following uses
are allowed:
a) Churches.
b) Child care centers - must be not-far-profit and affiliated with a church within the
Subdistrict.
c) Private schools - must be not-far-profit and affiliatcd with a church within the Subdistrict.
d) Individual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care
centers, adult and handicapped only) - must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church
within the Subdistrict.
c) Medical outrcach to the community, to include activities such as administering influenza
vaccine, checking blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives - must be not-for-
profit and affiliated with a church within thc Subdistrict.
Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict
Thc maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square fect. Thc maximum
height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, however, the Worship Center shall be
permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Developmcnt in this Subdistrict shall be designed to be
compatible with the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area.
In thc alternatc to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development
standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance with
the Residential Estatcs Subdistrict.
Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualify for the Transitional Conditional Use.
H:12006\2006096\\VP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\11ISSION SUBDISTRICT CP-2007-3 Ul.NGUAGE 091203 cepe (REV1SED lO0521),doc
Page I of1
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
JUSTIFICATION
FOR PROPOSED DEVIATIONS
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD
I. The justification for Deviation No. I to LDC Section 5.03.02.E.2, not to requirc a fence
or wall adjacent to the abutting residential Estate district is to maintain the rural character
of the adjacent zoned residential property. Constructing fences or walls adjacent to
Estate sized lots would impact the rural charactcr of this property.
Further justification for the request is set forth on the CFPUD Master Plan with expandcd
setbacks, buffers and the proposed development regulations designed to enhance
compatibility with adjacent and nearby properties.
PUDZ-PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 613/10
DUE: 7/1110
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\EXHIBIT E ~ JUSTlFICA TIONS l00521.docx
Page 1 of 1
Packet Page -1829-
co
f'o-
..--
E
QJ
~
..--
..--
o
N
--
CO
N
--
c.o
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
~ TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
RE-ZONING
(pROJECT NO. FI002.04)
PREPARED BY:
TR Transportation Consnltants, Inc.
13881 Plantation Road, Snite 11
Fort Myers, Florida 33912-4339
(239) 278-3090
PUDZ-PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 613110
DUE: 711110
April 27, 2010
Packet Page -1831-
"L TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
CO
r---
..- II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
E
QJ
-
..-
..- Ill. PROPOSED DEVELOP.MENT
0
N
--
CX)
N
--
<.0 IV. TRIP GENERA nON
V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY A}\;TI IMPROVE.MENTS
VIII. CONCLUSION
6/28/2011 Item 17. B.
1:.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
I. INTRODUCTION
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the
proposcd rc-zoning submittal for the Emmanuel Lutheran Church located to the south of
Oil Well Road west ofthe Everglades Boulcvard intersection in the Golden Gate Estates
area of in Collier County, Florida. This report has been completed in compliance with the
guidelincs establishcd by the Collicr County Transportation Planning Division for
developments seeking zoning approval. The approximate location of the subjcct site is
illustrated on Figure 1.
The proposed zoning application for the Emmanuel Lutheran Church would permit the
developmcnt of the site with a Church, a day care center, general officcs and a private
school. Currently the sitc is vacant. A methodology mecting was held with Collier
County Transportation Planning Staff on Fcbruary 2, 2010. A copy of the required
methodology notes are included in the Appendix of this report for rcference.
This report examines the impact of thc developmcnt on thc surrounding roadways. Trip
gcneration and assignmcnts to the site access driveways will bc completcd and analysis
conductcd to dcterminc the impacts of the dcvelopment on the surrounding interscctions.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to thc north by Oil W cll Road,
to the east by vacant residential propcrty, to the west by residcntial property and to the
south by vacant rcsidential property. Access to the site is proposed via two conncctions
to Oil Wcll Road.
P~n-P 1
Packet Page -1833-
[D
I'--
......
E "'-= ~
OJ
.....
fFrlL?-lL1 W
I r I \,
"I .
~"
--------
\
111lll NE
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
._-
.
'1 I'
------- -- if--
I
.
.
11
o
o
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
EMMANUAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
Figure 1
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
"'C.. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Oil Well Road is an east/west two-lane arterial roadway that borders the subject site to
the north. Acccss to the Emmanuel Lutheran site is proposed to Oil Well Road via two
connections. One access, located in the center of the parcel, is proposed to permit full
turning movements while a secondary access, located near the eastern property boundary,
will provide right-inlright-out access. The Collier County Department of Transportation
recently let the contract to widen Oil Well Road from Immokalee Road to east of
Everglades Boulevard to a four lane dividcd facility. Approaching Everglades
Boulevard, Oil Well Road will provide three lanes in cach direction through this
intersection, which will be signalized with the project. The Everglades Boulevard
intersection is located approximately 1,360 feet cast of the castern property boundary. To
the west, the next major intersection is Immokalce Road, which is located approximately
2 y, miles from thc proj ects western boundary. The Lcvcl of Servicc Standard on this
section of Oil Wcll Road from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard is LOS "D", or
1,010 vehicles (2 lane servicc volume).
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed re-zoning of the Emmanuel Lutheran sitc will allow for thc development
church relatcd uses and other uses bcnefieial to the local community. Table 1
summarizes the uses being included on the Schedule of Uses that wcre discussed with
Staff in terms of impacting the pcale hour trip gcncration.
rooose an ses
, ITE Land Use
ta:iid Use ,Ill tensity
, ,,', ' ,Code
,....., ' '.,'
Church 65,000 sq. ft. LUC 560
1,000 scats
Private 450 Students LUC 536
School
Daycarc 300 Studcnts LUC 565
Gcneral 15,000 sq. ft. LUC 710
Office
Table 1
Emmanuel Luthcran site
P dL dU
P~ap: i
Packet Page -1835-
"L TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
IV. TRIP GENERATION
OJ
r--
..-
Trip generation was determined by rcferencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's
(ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition. Land Use Code 560 (Church) was
utilized for the trip generation purposcs of the church rclated uses. For the weekday peak
hour church traffic, the square footage of floor arca was utilized for trip generation
purposes due to the lack of data based on the numbcr of seats. Howcver, for the Sunday
peak hour analysis, the numbcr of scats was assumed as the indcpendent variable for trip
gcncration purposes. For the school use, Land Use Code 536 (Private School K-12) was
utilized. For thc Daycare facility, Land Use Code 565 (Day Care Center) was utilizcd
and for the office uscs, Land Use Code 710 (Gcneral Office) was utilized. It should be
notcd that thc officcs will be utilized by thc Church during thc weckday. However, in
ordcr to maintain the most flexibility with the floor area, thc space was analyzed as
scparate officc uses. Table 2 indicatcs thc trip generation of the uscs proposcd as part of
the re-zoning application, and Table 3 indicatcs the trip generation of the church during
thc Sunday peak hour of the church uscs.
E
Q)
-
..-
..-
o
N
--
co
~
ill
Table 2
Emmanuel Lutheran site
Existing Church - Weekday Trip Generation
. '. . .. AM Peak Hour PMP.ealtHQllr Dail
LlIfid USe '.' ..",..y
. . IIi ..J.......Oiit . > Total nt.' ','A: ,7 oWE: ~; .'totij! : (i7iW!lY)
Church ! l4 !
22 36 13 l4 27 592
(65.000 sq. ft.) j-~42 -I' , :
I Privatc School I , ,
ll' 365 I 33 44 77 1,116
(450 Students) ~~O ,
1______ I I
I Day Care I I I
I ll9 ! l05 I 224 93 I l04 197 l,359
(300 Students) I , ! I
, ,
I i - I I
Officc 36 5 I 4l 4 l8 22 I 310
I I , I
(15,ODO sf) I
Total Trips 400 I 266 I 666 143 I 180 323 3,377
Page 4
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
h TRANSPORTATION
- K CONSULTANTS, INC.
V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The new trips based on the proposed re-zoning indicated within Tables 2 and 3 were then
assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the anticipated routes the drivers
vvill utilize to approach the site. The resultant traffic distribution, approved as a part of
thc methodology meeting, is illustrated on Figure 2. It should be noted that this facility
is proposed to serve thc rcsidents of thc Golden Gate Estatcs area. As you travel farther
away from the site, the trip distribution ",ill decrease based on the demographic and
markct arca that this site will serve. This is reflected in thc trip distribution graphic.
Based on the traffic distribution indicated within Figure 2, the development traffic was
distributcd to thc surrounding roadway nctwork. Figure 3 illustrates the assignment of
the total trips anticipated to bc gcncrated by the Emmanucl Luthcran sitc, indicated in
Tables 4 & 5, to thc site acccss drivcways.
VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
In ordcr to detcrmine which roadway scgments surrounding the sitc will be significantly
impacted, Table lA, containcd in the Appcndix, was creatcd. This table indicates which
roadway links will accommodatc an amount of projcct traffic greater than thc 2%-2%-3 %
Significance Tcst. Thc potcntial increase in trip gcneration of thc Emmanuel Lutheran
sitc as a result of the propos cd zoning amendmcnt was utilized to determine the
significantly impactcd arca for thc proposcd development.
PaQe 5
Packet Page -1837-
S
IN.ISI
co
t--
.,-
DROP 3%--
-"- 12 % -"-
~(5.6%)""""
E
OJ
=:-
t
10%
(4.7%)
-4-
DROP 2%
t
Oil WEll ROAD
t
17%
(7.6%)
-4-
t
20%'
(8.9%)
-4-
DROP 2%
/
.,-
.,-
o
N
-..
CO
N
-..
(!)
t
38%
(4.1%)
-4-
50% ,- i 50%
~123'10~ l. J~123%~
PROJECT SITE J
8%
+(3_2%)+
IMMOKAlEE ROAD
15%
+(1.6%)+ 0
0::
<{
>
w
-'
::J
o
(l)
z
o
(f)
-'
5:
o
0::
:;
W
-'
DROP 5%-- ::J
o
CD
(f)
W
o
20TH S
(9
0::
W
>
W
t
15%
(6.7%)
-4-
GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD
t
5%
(22%)
-4-
LEGEND
+20%+ TRIP DISTRIBUTION
+(20%)+PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE OF ADOPTED SERVICE VOLUME
R ~~~~~g~~~~~~c. TRIP D~S~~~NU~~~~:U~-~~~~o/~~~:g~ AREA_Fi9ureZ
(
'"
o
N
o
o
u::
.r 200 (72)
1(40) 140"'\. ~~
I "'0
I~:!..
-""
0'"
e;.-
OIL WELL ROAD
(31)60"'\.rr I
I~ I
\
I
I I
L_________~
I
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
EMMtp~~k~;~ag~ :;;;g:ERAN CHURCH
S
IN.T.S.[
o
0:::
~
..J
=>
o
III
(f)
W
o
S
(9
0:::
W
>
W
Figure 3
~ TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
ID
I'-
..-
The potential increase in project related traffic from Table 2 was compared with the 10-
month Level of Service Standard for Pcak Hour - Peak Direction traffic conditions in
ordcr to determine the project impact perccntage as indicatcd within Table lB. Bascd on
the information contained within Table IB, scvcral roadway links in the study area are
shown to cxpcricnce a significant impact as a result of the added project traffic associated
with the Emmanuel Luthcran zoning amcndmcnt in accordancc with the Collier County
2%-2%-3% Significance Test. Therefore, Levcl of Scrvice analysis is required along
those links showing a significant impact. These links include Oil Well Road from
Immokalec Road to east of Evcrglades Boulcvard, Immokalee Road from Wilson
Boulcvard to cast of Evergladcs Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard from Immokalee
Road south to Golden Gate Boulevard.
E
OJ
~
..-
..-
o
N
--
co
N
--
to
In addition to the significant impact critcria, Table lA also includes a buildout
concurrency analysis on thc Collier County Roadway network. Thc surrounding roadway
nctwork was analyzed based upon thc projected 20 l5 traffic conditions. Thc total
volume indicated within the 2009 Annual Update Invcntory Report (AUIR) rcflects the
currcnt remaining capacity on the adjacent roadway network. 111e rcmaining capacity
was subtracted from the 10-month scrvice volumc on each roadway in order to determine
the 2009 peak season, peak hour, pcak direction traffic volume on the adjacent roadway
network.
Thc appropriate arumal grov.1h ratc for these roadways was calculated bascd upon a
comparison of thc 2006 and 2009 Annual Inventory Update Reports. Thc growth ratc
calculations can be found within the Appendix of this rcport for referencc. This annual
growth ratc was thcn us cd to factor the 2009 peak season, pcak hour, peak direction
traffic volume to 2015 pcak scason, peak hour, pcak dircction background traffic
conditions. A minimum 2% annual growth ratc was assumed for all roadway scgments
anal yzed.
Page 8
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
'L TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
The resultant 2015 peak season, peak hour, peak dircction traffic volume was subtracted
from the Level of Service Standard in order to determine the remaining capacity in the
year 2015. The net new project generated traffic was thcn subtracted from the remaining
capacity in order to determine the remaining 2015 capacity after the potential incrcase in
traffic resulting from the proposed amendment is added to the surrounding roadway
network. Figure 4 indicates the results of the capacity analysis along thc significantly
impacted roadway links.
VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND IMPROVEl\fENTS
Bascd upon thc information contained within Table lA, all roadway links analyzed are
shown to operate acceptably after the addition of the Emmanuel Lutheran site traffic.
Thcrefore, the proposed developmcnt is expectcd to be consistent with Policy 5.1 of the
Collier County Growth Management Plan. Thus, no roadway link improvements will be
required as a result of the proposed re-zoning of the Emmanuel Luthcran sitc.
Intersection analysis was pcrformed as a result of the added Emmanuel Luthcran site
traffic bascd on both the weekday peak hour trip generation as wcll as the Sunday AM
peak hour of thc Church use. Based on the methodology mecting, intersection analysis
was requircd at the two sitc acccss drives on Oil W cll Road. In order to perform the
requircd intcrsection analysis, it was ncccssary to dctermine the 2015 background PM
through traffic volumcs along Oil Well Road. Thereforc, the peak hour, peak dircction
volumcs indicated within Figure 4 wcre factored by the appropriatc directional factors.
The appropriate lanc arrangements and the buildout turning movcmcnts indicatcd within
Figure 3 wcre inputtcd into the SYNCHRO software in ordcr to pcrform the necessary
interscction analysis at the two site access drive intcrsections. The rcsults of thc
intcrscction capacity analyses can be found within Table 4 below.
Page 9
Packet Page -1841-
co
I'-
..-
..-
..-
o
N
--
CO
N
--
(!)
E
Q)
-
IMMOKAlEE ROAD
484
(437)
[419]
4.7%
1.723
(1,322)
[1.254]~
41% ,
o
DO:
<{
>
W
..J
=>
o
ell
Z
o
CJ)
..J
s:
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
528
(481)
[450]
7.6%
N
W,*E
S
IN.T.S.I
783
(310)
{[220]
t 12.3%
Oil WEll ROAD
783
(310)
[220]\
12.3% \
\ 484
L(437)
[415]
5.6%
\ 633
L(585)
[571J
3.2%
o
DO:
:;;
W
..J
=>
o
ell
CJ)
W
o
::i
(9
DO:
w
>
w
LEGEND
000 CURRENT REMAINING CAPACITY
(000) REMAINING CAPACITY PROJECTED IN 2015
[000] REMAINING CAPACITY PROJECTED IN 2015 WITH PROJECT
0.0% PROJECT IMPACT vs. LOS STANDARD
r ...,
I I
I I
L --"
PROJECT SITE J
594
(481)
[450]
8.9%
REMAINING CAPACITY ON
SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED ROADWAY LINKS F' 4
EMMANUAl lUTHERAN CHURCH Igure
20TH
594
(555)
[528]
6.7%
GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
~ TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
Table 4
Intersection Analysis Results
Emmanuel Lutheran site
Oil Well Rd. NB approach
@W.Site
Access (Full) WE left
Oil Well Rd.
@E.Site
Acccss
(R-iuIR-out)
Analysis assumed both intersections operate under unsignalized conditions
NB approach
LOSB
(13.2 see)
Lose
(16.5 see)
LOSB
(11.0 see)
Based on the results of the intcrsection analysis listed above, all approaches to each
intersection analyzed were shown to operate at an acceptable Lcvel of Service condition
in 2015 during the weekday P.M. peak hour with the new trips anticipated to be added by
the development of the Emmanuel Lutheran Church property. During the wcekday A.M.
peak hour, the northbound left tum movcment cxiting the site is shown to experience
some additional delay to cause a LOS "F" on this movcment. Howevcr, based on the
anticipatcd trip gencration, it does not appcar any further traffic control devices will be
warranted. Further examination of this movement and the trip generation will be
complcted at thc time of the Site Developmcnt Plan approval stage (SDP).
PaQe II
Packet Page -1843-
~ TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
VIll. CONCLUSION
E
a>
~
The proposed rczoning of the site proposed to contain the Emmanuel Lutheran Church is
consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Policy 5.1. The subject
parcel is located along the south side of Oil Wcll Road west of it's intersection with
Everglades Boulevard in the Golden Gate Estates area of Collicr County, Florida. The
surrounding roadway network was analyzed bascd on the 2015 buildout traffic
conditions. As a result, all roadway links wcre shown to operate acceptably aftcr the
addition of thc proposed Emmanucl Luthcran site traffic in accordance with thc Collier
County Traffic Impact Statcmcnt Guidelines.
co
I'--
......
......
......
o
N
---
a:>
N
---
<0
Intersection analysis was performed at thc site access drives with Oil Well Road. Bascd
on the results of the interscction analysis, all approachcs to each intcrsection analyzed
wcre shO\"n to operate at an acceptablc Lcvel of Scrvicc condition in 2015 with the new
trips anticipated to bc added by the development of the Emmanuel Lutheran Church
propcrty. Some delay is anticipated on the sitc acccss drive approach to Oil Well Road
during the weckday A.M. peak hour, but thc dclay will bc contained within the subject
site and should not require any additional traffic control mcasures. FUlther analysis will
be complcted once a more detailed sitc plan and uses is prescnted for the SPD
application. Therefore, no interscction improvcments arc warrantcd as a result of this
anal ysis.
Page 12
APPENDIX
Packet Page -1845-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
METHODOLOGY MEETING
MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
APPENDIX A
INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST
Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are
overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply.
Date: 2> ( " l 0
:)-~oo
Time:
Location:
People Attendin!!::
Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers
1) 7&D~1l ~ TrC4'15Psrk)~ C<i'l'tS 237- .2-7'?-3090
,
2)
3)
4)
5)
Studv Preparer: - ~ ~ - f
Preparer'sName and Title: IEz:, I~, rr-esloq>-
Organization: .It<.. TrCN1SJ/IY~
Address & Telephone Number':
Reviewer(s):
Reviewer's Name & Title:
Collier County Transportation Planning Department
Reviewer's Name & Title:
Organization & Telephone Number:
Applicant: I ~
Applicant's Name: 6mmarJ ue. LI{he.rCl.Y1 Ckurul, oT" N.1.pl~
Address:
Telephone Number:
Proposed Development:
Name: V1~
Location:
Land Use Type:
ITE Code #:
Proposed number of development units:
Other:
Description: s.
U VI ([)""f
ClA-urJA.- 0 S e. ~.~ _ .~ CDl<..Q'i PvVl f) e.v..'.C ~
- S:,~~)o~;^C-~( wkP-Cy.t!' -kr tur.-c lo.-V\es
Packet Page -1847-
CaMpU.)
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Zoning
Existing:
Comprehensive plan recommendation:
Requested:
Findings of the Preliminary Study:
,~ 1,;,)
,i
Studv Type:
Studv Area:
Boundaries:
Complete 0
None 0
- ~<2-::l
Traffic operations
o
-;r
- 5,$
Additional intersections to be analyzed: I~ (;)14 P. '" ~.f+-I-vl"(\- t4'\c<.\'/ 5 ,: 5 (rY
. ~ P'Ver61a.ot') Cl :;,\1).0 ?!1ftSg
HOrlzou Year(s): ) n I ~ .
Analysis Time Period(s):m'^ [17m ()6:.c-cL S "'" "'1 ,)n..v. J;.".... ctIJrvIr-
Future Off-Site Developments:
Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE r 8 t<-- ED.
Reductions in Trip Generation Rates:
None:
Pass-by trips:
1ntemal trips (PUD):
Transit use:
Other:
'hs..1:>JCT I () N S.
'B"2-cpO'-b~ ~
u~
Horizon Year Roadwav Network Improvements:
Od weu 6 L-J) l:lp\?(Y(.?-r'7c/Jls..~
Methodology & Assumptions:
Non-site traffic estimates: _lod1 LtbJ I (Z
Site-trip generation:
Trip distribution method: tJIlcw,vo.;/ C .se~ o~ ~hcfl A1~ )
Traffic assignment method:. //1c"1uo-/l .-. P--- ,:f;
Trafficgrmvth.rate:~jl62 (2c~,-",.) c7r~.(L
~ -VL"'DtArV '4YJU''''';6S- h9t:.. J-ivvJ-'- /AU ""'''H-tN Vz.
~ 6\?~'1Al1CiJ"L- (~% vl~TlorJ""<.... ,y/:>jil- t'5{)"-IOLV ]Z:cTvJeEIJ
I cf'ec/"",vG:> Go)'C..L M::>T c.cV1'-" 4",41'"'--'ST ~~(ulZ...y ~/J7'
,~ ~ ~I j".,~ ~ '8
("T1&- ../ j-/
/
5tc b~}f "
{)L'7dL I
~,
MlLE.'
/
T'*'" $-€'
~
1) (s,T~l3u (I ~
i'''1 "P '
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Soecial Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience)
Accident locations:
Sight distance:
Queuing:
Access location & configuration:
Traffic control:
Signal system location & progression needs:
On-site parking needs:
Data Sources:
Base maps:
Prior study reports:
Access policy and jurisdiction:
Review process:
Requirements:
Miscellaneous:
Applicant
Packet Page -1849.
29
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
TABLEIA
(J)
iii
~
<(
z
<(
>-
o
z
w
0:
0:
z::l
00
_z
....0
00
~'"
<(i5~
~~o:
w<(w
...Jw!:::
<lla.0:
<( .0
....0:....
::l0
0<(
J:a.
~:;:
<(-
W....
a.:l!
~
u..
Z
Cl
iii
~
::.,
,
~
~
~
1-..
o
,..
~
c.
<(
,.:.
N
w
~ ffi ~ W;ji1ii~
w y g
" ~ -
~ ~ <t
~ III 0
~ ~ "
~ ~ ~
iJ';ffi~~I~~r.:;
~ ~ ~ ~
n::u lI.~~e~
n~~
*~~~~u<t ~~m
N ~ ~
~
U~~~g
u ~ ~I
~
I ~ n ~
~
~ g ~
"" "
" " N
~ ~ ,..j
t; ~ ~I 8 g :!
w ~
a ~
If ~ :il ~ ~ ~
~~~~Ii:~I"""
6! a 11l $ co
w "
~ .
~Ui~~~
~~~I~e;~
2 ~ ~ ...: ::: ;j
~ ~
~ 0
:€.I ~
~UI~~~
~ ~
o 0
'0
"
Ul <t <:> a <:>
o Q ~ N ....
..J ~ _ ~ :2
~
~
o ~
~ ;!
I! II
:;: ~
~
I~l~~~
"
r I
" "
~
Z
~ 91 ;:: 01 ~
W
~
~ ~
~ N
~ ~
u 0
u:: u:
~ ~
~ ~
" "
~ ~
~ ~
U 0
W W
o a
" "
. .
" "
=> =>
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
w w
. .
:;: :2
~ Q
~ ~
~ i5
o 0
~ ~
~ ~
(Ii 55
. .
, ,
~ ~
rn rn
ffi~~~1 ~ ]' ]'
"" U5 Jj Jj
'E '0 '0
~ ~ ~
.,.
"
rn
1
" ~
w w
~ ~
~ ~
I" I"
~ ~ ~ ~
o N
~ ~ :: ~
~ :; ~ ~
.., .,. ~ :!
..,. 'It ~ ~
* ~ ~ ~
m lfi II) 0
)0 >- ~ Z
~ ~ !: ~
.0 -i ..,
~ ~ ffl ~
';f ~ ~ g
"if! ;J!. <f!. "if!.
~ e ffl ~
~ ~ ~ :x
..,. .., ~ ~
#. #. 'if!. ;J!.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Cl::
..., M ~ ~
~ ;g ~ ~
Z zoo
..J ...J -' ..J
"" N m <D
<P '" Ill'"
<l" .., ..... .....
~
m -ci
'" -0 -ci ::-
~ 0:: 0:: 55
~ li ~ 5
Q:i S ;> ..!!l
Jj 6 (5 ~
0: 0: b 0-
u.i :i. ui :s:
~
~l f
9 ~
Packet Page -1851-
"
rn
o
"
~
~
Q
Ul <.r.l (/) (/)
w w w w
:-)0)0 )0
:il ~ ~ ;!
"" 10 00 ..,.
; ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~'
~ x ;:t ~
l/l Il'l III lI'l
In Ul III 0
~ ~ ~ z
~ ~ ~ ltl
...; cd to N
;:; ~ ~ I;7J
~ IE g 2
;f. "if- if!. <fl.
~ ~ ~ ..,
; ~ ~ ~
#. #.;f. <f!.
<:> 0 <:> 0
<:> <:> 0 <:>
N N N N
~ :g :g g
M M M M
<:> 0 0 <:>
<:> <:> c <:>
CIl 0> O'l ell
~ ~ ~ ~
'" '" III ..,
~ ~ ;:! ~
t
.
"P -ci ~
.J:: 0::: III ~
~ ~ ~ ~
:5 6 ~ ~
'E 0 '0 '0
z uj (fj v.i
~
a
.
,
"
,
.
,
,
w
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
.
"
~
"
~
.
~
1!
~
"
~
~
~
o
~
J1
,;
.
o
~
~
6
,
.
~
,
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ]
~ 'fa
g :5
u _~
~
8 ,[
8 ~
N "
. "
5 ~
E .
o .
~ ~
~ ~
. ..
~ [i:
~ ..2
o "
~ .
"
~ ~
6 ~
~ ~
6 '0
~ ..
s ~
2 ]
-E' iii
t'J ~
o ,
~ "
~ g
~ ~
~ 5
~ "
;a ~
" "
. .
~ ~
.
~
~
.~
~
"
~
,
<
e
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
TABLEIB
PEAK AND OFF-PEAK DIRECTIONAL
IMP ACT TO ADOPTED LOS
STANDARD
O'l ~ 6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
0 ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. '" ""
0 I- '" ;;: <'l 0 '" '" ;:: 0 0 0 0
N en oo ~ 0 '" '" " 0 0 "-
w .,; .. '" 0 '" .. M
... 1;;
Ql
.c " :I:
E u: I- ~
U. ::>
Ql i:! 0 0 N :: ~ ;; '" " .. '" "
.... en '" " '" N N <'l N '"
a. I-
Ql ?-
m "
w Q
"0 .., I-
0 en ;f. ;f. ;f. ... ... ... ... ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f.
Ql '" I- en ;;: '" <'l <;; '" '" " 0 '" '" '"
.... "- ~ 0 oo ~ 0 ~ oo .. <'l "
III :s -' .. .,; '" '" 0 M M '" 0
"0
a. "- x ;f.
::l ::. ~
0 N 0 f;j '"
z " '" ;; ~ ;\ N ;;; N N "
~ ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. ;f. '" '" ;f. '" ;f. ;f.
l- N oo " '" oo oo oo '" a; '" '"
en <'l ~ oo '" " "- oo .. ~
w <ri ~ M .,; .. '" ,..: .,; ..
1;;
" :I:
u: I- W
~ ::> :s
0 ::> '" 0 N '" 0 0 0 '" <'l 0 ~
oo -' ~ 0 <'l .. .. .. '" '" ..
I- 0 N
I- >
"
W Q
.., I- '"
0 oo ... ... ;f. '" ;f. ;f. ... ... ... ...
'" I- oo oo ~ ~ ;:: '" ;!: '" N '" " N
"- ~ <'l N 0 "1 0 '" '" N
W 0 '" <ri '" M M .. .,; <ri <ri '"
I- :s -'
Z Z .. x ;f.
w 0 I- W
:2E N '" :s
'" 0 0 0 <'l N
Z . z ::> N N " 0 oo 0 0 0
W '" ~ -' 0 ~ '" N ~ '" ... '" '" N
~ 0:: N 0 N
>
m z z
m ;2 Q " 0 :I: :c :I: J: J: J:
!O z l- I- I-
<( " II :J u: ;::: ?- m oo oo l- I- l- I- l- I- I-
...... l- I- U. " ~ ::> '" ~ ::> '" '" '"
::> ::> 0 w w w
W (..) W 0 0 '" i:! w ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
u: :c ~ I- 0: en 2 en '2 2 2
...J l- e
!O u. ::l I-
<( ;2 oo
I- ...J w
I- ...J 0 <'l " 1;: '" '" ... ... '" '" '" "# ... '" ...
<( 0 ;!: u: :I: 0 0 '" ~ 0 '" ~ " 0 ~ oo
I- ... U. I- oo oo '" N
(..) ::l l- i:! ::>
z z 0
W W I- oo
""') <( " I-
'" " I-
0 :2E w w oo
0:: :2E "- .., ..
" " 0 w <I' ... <I' 0' <I' '" '" ... '"
c.. w '" :i: ... , "#
:;:: :;:: 0 0 '" ~ 0 '" ~ " 0 ~ oo
U. I- '" oo '" ~ N
'"
0
z
C
I- 0 0 0 '" 0 0
oo N N 0 " '" 0 0 0 0
oo "'. <0. 0. '" <0 '" " 0 0 0 0
'" '" cO cO '" '" '" '"
0
-'
I-
Z
w ~I '" '" 0 <0 <0 oo ... <0 oo oo ...
:s N ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~
:c ~ "
n. ii: w
> > oo
<0 '"
'" N
<0 <'l
" U
u: u:
U- U- ~
'" '" " -0
'" '" > " ~
l- I- a; > > n.
l- I- a; a; -0 .
~ -0 ,; ,;
u u . ~ ~ " > rn
w w " . . a: a: a; '" a: W '"
.., .., ro " u
0 0 -a, ro ro W W c Q Q > c
n: '" I- 0; C, c, ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ '" .
z $ 0; 0; -" ~ u
n. n. > s: 15 <3
w Vi w > > <5 6 is is
n: '" :s w w N '"
::> ::> '" '5 '5 '5 0 13 '5 '5 '5 '5 '5 '5
0 0 w ,; ,; ,;
:c :c en W W Z ui Z ui ui ui
:< :< u ,;
ili ili ro
0 >
n. n. u '" a;
ro
" " II 0 . .
<t n. n: . .
rn "
-' -' w ~ rn
<t ;': ~ 0 ~
I- " 0;
0 0 >
l- I- Packet Page .1853-" w
---,,,,,' ^-----,.'
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
ANNUAL GROWTH RATE
CALCULATIONS
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS
2006 2009 ANNUAL
CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH
ROADWAY SEGMENT ]D# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE
Evergaldes N. of Oil Well 136 491 372 3 2.00%
S. of Oil Well 135 594 306 3 2.00%
S. of Golden Gate 134 353 370 3 2.00%
lmmokalee Roal E. of Collier Blvd 44 2,027 2,094 3 2.00%
E. of Wilson Blvd 45 1.773 1,947 3 3.17%
N. of Oil Well Rd 46 426 376 3 2.00%
Oil Well Rd. E. of Immokalee Rd 119 669 837 3 7.75%
E. of Everglades 120 527 377 3 2.00%
. All traffic volumes were taken from the 2006 & 2008 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR)
.. In instances where the historical data indicates a reduction in traffic or insufficient data was available to calculate
a gro'Nth rate due to construction, a minimum annual groVl'lh rate of 2.D% was assumed.
SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION
Annual Growth Rate (AGR) =
2009 ADT
2006 ADT
~(1Nrs of Growth)
-1
AGR (Immokalee) =
1,947
1,773
^(1/2)
.1
AGR (Logan Blvd) =
3.17%
Packet Page -1855-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
....
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
FIGURES APPENDIX 1 & APPENDIX 2
s
lus.1
[
.,.
.0
N
o
o
u::
+1,310 (838)
+200 (72)
1(1,310) 891+1~7
I (40) 140.... '" <=>
.... "'...
I I S~
I Ie--
I
I I
L_________.-J
+1,510 (910)
(1,314)871+ r ~
(31) 60~ ~ I
I~ I
I
I
OIL WELL ROAD
o
a::
~
-J
::J
o
aJ
(f)
W
o
:5
CJ
a::
w
>
w
""C. TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
2015 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EMMI~;~~~t^p~g~ ~l'~~~ERAN CHURCH Figure A-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
._.__ __ _ _ ------l
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
C()
N
--
to
.-
.-
.r
I :: ~,H
I "\-1
I 1
I
.-
.-
:t,H
"\-1
1
I
I
I
L______
S
IN.TSI
OIL WELL ROAD
'\.
.-
.-
.-
~
~H~~ :r
':/' ~~H,H
..
..
"\-
o
0::
;;;
W
...J
=>
o
CD
(fJ
W
o
<(
...J
(J
0::
w
>
w
1: TRANSPORTATION
K CONSULTANTS, INC.
INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES
EMMANUAL LUTHERAN CHURCH Figure A-2
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
SYNCHROINTERSECTION
ANALYSIS
Packet Page -1859-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Oil Well Rd. & W. Site Access
2015 AM Peak Hour Volumes
-" f'-"'!'"
~EiIl~~~W8.~~Jl!]...iIlIilti~
~~,~".~gr.o~n~!~'-o.,o~;~~71.t.:.o,..F.".'~."'.i),.;,;~:;..:'Ct.'e"!.!'.:"""':. .~,: . "I. '-F'..f+e"t" ;S'I'o'~'S:; '(I
~~"~,.'}H'h,.;;;..",."".,,:.',~,";,.~~~.:}1IL,",_,,,.s~t"_ .~".<__ ': _,.......,J:, :"-,~~"lit, '" _ .-'t,,<j,.':- ,'-,'J:,-,-~-,':Jtfh~:,~.-,~'~j~:::'~'f,g:;2<ZlBt5;~~i~f:J{;t:~iii,;,:;'::;t:;~
Grade 0% 0% 0%
~~dWi~5lllJ!~:,')",\ .Jj,~;E)140:': .200. 1,31:Q:',:::}~~~,.40
Peak Hour Fector 0.92 0.'92.. '5:92 0.92 0,92 092.'
!iJ.~HllYin2Mii!If[i\iRIij!j- 96if::"f5~217 1424, 4~ ,.
Pedestrians
UfngWIB!hiCltji.:i '.
W~ik:;:;gSp~ea (Ns)
pefGif~f.Bic3GR?g~
Righi tu,,; 'tiare -(verij
!0"~!ii~!ftYB~:' .... . Raised
Median storage veh) 2
1lfR.~Jfe~iffsig5~!(ilj.'......
pX, platoon unblocked
W~;j,t26ms(ilf['~2jl@g 1121 211.5 484
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 968
v.92,~i~ile2 c~nfvoi 1147
vCu, unblocked vol 1121 2115484
te; si~~I" (5) 4,1 6.8. 6.9
IC, 2 slage (s) '5,8
W~ U ~ D
pO queue free % 66 5 92
cMca.padty(veh/h) 631 153 534 .
Iillff1[I[q;~i~J;i~~~~'lYJllili;!iJ~1~~
Vo umeTotal . 48 .. A8." 152. 217 712' 712 . 45 43'.. ..... '.. ...... ,. ..,
Volume Left 0 0 0 217 0 0 145 0
VolUnieRight 0 b 152 . 0 0 0 0 43
cSH 1700 1700 1700 631 1700 1700 153 534
Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.28 0.09 0,34 0.42 0.42 0.95 0,08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 38 0 0 172 7
Control Delay (5) 00 0,0 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 1178 12.3
Lane LOS B F B
Approach Delay (5) 0.0 1.8 93.4
Approach LOS . F
m~~~fiDJI~ji"m1" ":'""~\'J,f,;;,'(tt-. ~,~.., _...;;!1i
Average Delay 7.0
lnt_ers~ctjori-_c:apacity Utiiiz,!!tion 53.1 % leu Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: Oil Well Rd. & E. Site Access
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
2015 AM Peak Hour Volumes
- .,.
of
-+-
"\
/""
~Mt~,l~__. _:_~1i'l,JjI.' 'CI'Jh~_.IC~!:;l'~~\'j!j'D~t'._~i'.'._'_"_"':-'~_.~~'~~. '. _.":..': c.:.
Lane Confi9urations .u_t.t.__
~IIDI~_~~iI =_ ,~:,1k'~; 0 " ~ :;~~~~~1t~J~W~!~~~~g~
Grade 0% 0% 0%
''''''lI''_'=_\i''''''_m~ml,""",,''~~-,'i';;}'''''''''''"~''''''1l"''''.'f''''''''''''''''''''""',",2-"'''7,"'''
~UiU1J~ii\?~:!J1H~~~t&'!;~r.:~~1~h'>$.:'i~~~~~~~~~~1Jij:~~~~~ilHib~"1*\]~~~J:'&~fl~;ti::'~~::;:B'Fi'~i-:::,g:,;,:<5Si1;~'~~;,&::~
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
~'?\tl~., -1~~~~1"H:.'!I~~~"I';~Jt~~."'; ~~. _,', .~ ~i~~~~~~"'l~~.'~m~mE.~1'f.~~~T(i":<;'-:t:!,:P'f;~~~Z~;w;n,~i;;~:;o1;Yf~nt.i~
~~1~D:~~1"ti:'{~J,ffi:(~~~"'J:WH.\lll.ii':t.~:~:i'~~g*,!1:!jttr~1ll'J..;v.~~~?;;k1:Ji;n~:~&:.:iJ&~~~,i11.~ff\l~'It~'~..:;,::"-",,?,,~_,,,,:,1~1~'Ifu"'",,~,:,_'_I-__:,~,-_",:""""",'h:;,"l.:'>"",'h!~'l~~O;:'~~
Pedestrians
~1m~~~m~I~YJi{;~~lf~~~)'f~~~~~~:70i;jv0;:JQ~SK~i~%~,~~;~~Jir~Bif'~t;~~~\'1t~f;rT!,~i;r;f~!tH;]i~1*}:\;::If:?~itt~':m~;~f~~:{'1
Walking_ Spe.ed (ftis) . ._. _"._.,,, _ __..... .
~!ft~~!1'::,~~~[t[G1J1:l;~~,~\:);::;,;\%o/0::~:_:i~~~~;:~~,~f:~":":': ';:;K7;~:~}['~{~;i~~;Y!~:f~~,~f~jij~~M~!E~:Y{f;~i~;:'~!'f<1i'/!:~' '<'{;(':,T~::;~;;:;:,::~,\ ,':~- :~,: ,:t:-'<~:il' ~,1;~;i ~~
Right turn fiare'(veh) . . . , ..'
mm~_~!1y~~~:n;'~!J"D~;:!;,tt~~~g!;i~~;:.:r:_~:~:;('~~~" !'!~~-'~:!S.:~YF~iWF!1t-:i;r!;,' :f::'~r':~i~'W.\;,;.r{f~5:;~~Nfm~i~}!,if.:~~rl,~j[~~;XW;:f~f~r,ii;\> - '.: ',;'i.:
Median st~;age vehj<' .. ',.. - .
W_tTh1f~_~ID~~i91j~1f!fb1rMK~yii~~':~:,:;::ir:,\~;~c:';:;'7:r.~,::rl:i~~u:~:~~r;.' ;;?t;'F:?~r;tc:~-i~:;;:;~i::r~:f;~;S~~;::~f:t~::;'~1;?,~Ti:~::-;:ti(T.~?e:::,.'~ -.
pX, pi'~icion unbicicked . .'
X~ireormrc1r~9tvQlljrIJ~:~~:1;f~ii,;~:'ri: ::~i::~;?':~:~:77f;f!~}": 1lQ~';:~~:'~::c,!\:'j~~II;;;,TIrn~'::!ft~:J~7~'!:f~~tt~l:~~,~;;~:::.lJ' :,:.it '"-~,:;,-,; .' .c' -, \-
~(5rsta~ge"f ~~"~f~~r ~"-
~g27$\\l1le;~'tqnt:V51 . ,.
vCu, unblocked vol
!i3[ slMgie (Ii) ·
tC, 2 stage (s)
iF].)":' " .,
pO queue free %
,M capi!~iiQ tv~tjlh) .
. ',,'"
"_":,,,::;\,
\. ;;J.::~;~
" - ;.,~, .'J;:~i~~~:,', :~,,}:
;,~ji ~:\,,"
\'IoiQ "e.t'oliii ..
Volume Laft
V6il:ime Right
cSH
Volume, to Capacity.
Queue Length 95th (ft)
controi Delay (oj
Lane LOS
APrea"ch belay (s)
Approach LOS
;,. -"473":':" 47""$' ..""6$""
o
6~
1700
0.04
o
0.0
o
. ::,. Q'.
1700
028
o
0.0
o
5
1700
028
o
0.0
82"6T"'8~:-~:C1"~.;; .
o .. 0
1700 1700
oila 0.48
o 0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
Q,1?
17
132
B
13.2
B
~"<;'~~~~~ ~~~~~:j1r~j,>ct!""'1 21~..:2~'.::L~"'{~~.'i'::':d~~'f
0.5
45.1%
15
'ieU Level 01 Service' .'
A
Average Dalay
\BleroeCii"nCapaCily 8tilizatlbn
Anaiys;s Period (min)
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
Packet Page -1861-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Oil Well Rd. & W. Site Access
2015 PM Peak Hour Volumes
Weekday PM Peak Hour
-- ,.
f
-
"\
I""
.~_~~~IlIiBl!lI1""~
~.~~,;s.~..nfi~~.~. ~~~..;~t'.'~W$ft,:T",;t!"... "'.. "'~.'" ...'1_'::M;,,,,~:l~.c.T! ..".'....'. ..""i.,..""'.lli...._.,."";.."''''''''''',ilT'~..,.,~''C.<l':fjj;
StgD;:~j~D!~!i!!J:t#i2~i~:;tk~~~:~[ee.t.!1'\1[/~1t:Bi~t:;:~r&1&;~Jt. ." ~.;:~;~;;~J.l~!:"~~~"t<-:\f:~,;tk~s.;~~1~i~..:' ',1e::f;:~~'t!!~di..~b_i
Grade" ,'''-''"''-'~'?'''' ., '50/:' '''''' "'"'" ..". OO/o'""''''''~ 00/0 ~ -"',~,""."'"~ .~.. "" -- """'"
8?91'~m~~li;(v,~l1ZpJg;j~:;gjg;,:60ii~jj~~:~~-~:t~tCi.~'~!'~~~;_~jla~~~~~TtJ~,Wi~:~::\:S[e;:~7~~~~Ji~~~I~j~~C::~}l~iWt~~~~;:i:i',;Si;~~~;~j;)~~~~~
p"eakHourFaclor ,.. '0:92"0.92 . 092 . 6'.920.92iJ:iiz" ..-' ,.'-..," -".. ..,..- ...
~~4[~{~]llX;~'i~~~,1~~~:f:;:;~i.;:{()j!~.t;.':,:1;~~~'l~'ii;~~:7~JtE:t~I"fi:;:~~ft:,::~i~~~t~[K9~'~lifilit~l1iri~.:~~\~t~;fi;j:~;:'~;,:;';,2:;~~~~~Zfl~I,Jl~~
Pedestrians
b~DiX\tlilltlilll11!iiiiE!I :
Walking Speed (Ws)
p\ifii~hI~e~1Hi9%i,'S' j '. ,." ...
Ri9ht turn flare (veh)
M.~~1~bi2p~1 7...............,'.
Median storage veh)
lJP~Ji,!l~fjj}~!9Ij~i(fi). ...........
pX, platoon unbiocked
v!f;:c<?nl!islingv~lyri~.' . 1467 ;?Q;((1. 712
vC1, stage 1 conI vol 1424
vC?, ~fag~2~()nh;61 612
vCu, unblocked vol 1467 2036
lC. sinSle}s) .. 4.1 6.a
tC. 2 stage (5) 5.8
~W .' u ~ ~
pO queue free % 83 43 90
dvtcapacify (vehlh) 466 173 379
~~~~~\P~~~~_
Voiume Left 0 0 0 78 0 0 98' 0
Volume Righi 0 0 43 0 0 0 b 3a
cSH 1700 1700 1700 466 1700 1700 173 379
VolUme to Capacity 0,42 0,42 0,03 0.17 0.27 0.27 0.57 b.io
QueueLen9th95th(ft) 0 0 0 15 0 0 74 8
Control. Delay (5) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 50.2 15.5
Lane LOS B F C
Approach Delay (5) 0.0 11 40.5
Approach LOS E
ilm'~~~~
Average Delay 2,6
i"nters-edion Capacity Utilization 55.2%
Analysis Period (mln) 15
Rai~.e.Q ,
2
712
69
,ICU Level 01 Service
B
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: Oil Well Rd. & E. Site Access
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
2015 PM Peak Hour Volumes
Weekday PM Peak Hour
-
,.
-f
+-
'\
I'"
fl~4f~~<"-_______' ~_ l~ll~V/l!~_ '\~AVA-~t~~~;\l _ ~~l~t~\'_ _~__~__~ _"-~~_~__
~fi~,gUrations ~l~il!"='"'''' ++~."~. ,. ~I.~"'~"""~""""_'.' ~~"w'-'-'~"""""""'--~'ffi"R"m
;, "'. "'" ' "." -,' ':,' ", ,'" _'"l!r ' ,_ ,,~~ '.,:,- ~#l'i, :",~~m .": ~4" 0 ".,',',!.l<li!},1,~:! ,'~'i\.~j. ' j.." "!:~i~%:'lL ~ ',~1S~,i1\-~'~~_~i~1jt1'W" 'j:,- ,-'~_;
"~,=~~\ll.,,,, ." ...~) .,."....,..-",_,.....,... ", ;;t.~1""....,....~, ...,IDii... .f.', i. _..._',,~ .~".~" ,._""~lt.,, .' ,''''''"_.,''''.:e,\L,~~,.,.:r.If".,...,,,.',.,}~L '
Grade 0% 0% 0%
1~,."'''.''''''','!ilI~[;%H''~~'":li_'~.~~~l1~~1;''''!\\''''.,..';!1il!'~Jl(''''ffi''""iI,',j.~,,:"w;,""C1'f"'.:j.~ic?i";,
~~1iU~11j~!!~J;':1~C~ill.iai ':t,'1i!.~i~k.~~:~.';;'" ':J;itiit1'i1l..'?-~\'f'tBi!'~&~ ".!:t<: '~ZlE;.If5~J;\.~'~t\t1~}f_r:.~,,-p;:;:i.i\;:b~il':~:t.il')'fi~~5J::~t~~,,:'1~t_r':'ii:~,.{;i-:"":}::":i~,:1:;:;:~,;,;':.,.;
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
lUmalmfJJJ~m~4~1~~~~~~~im~E~Jlf~~~~~~I~'ii*~6~ft~El~Wt~~iIf~~.r~Y1:0;?~\~~~;,~t~~~~~r~f:0~~~~~~~K~~
Pedestrians
~~~~,~~01~~ff~r';~~t~~~~~f1f,~~m1~'.,;:FM~~~,~~~iZi:;~:;;~:\~T~~;1k~/F'V,~tj;A:f.;,:'ji~:~f::;ifig?;::/:~r~~ffJS~~?t~i:{0J'~::'iiWi~itK.:::::.;;j:~f~1~ft~~ififfty.\7H~
Walking Speed (ftIs)
~~E~l~~9B;;";'(-
Right turn flare (veh)
IV1mI![~~:fyp_~~j;?,~f}ttW:~],JV~U~~>i:~.!J.:: ~:~~~:::ri:,:~::',:,- :;~,~::,. :' '--, ':;",:::J.:(~,::~_ ~!r} ::Np1j~ic>C'~:'::::F'; :;~:
Median storage veh}
t)~I~~~rnl1milfl);;{t?i..:.I.;' .. - ,,~.. '!!".'
pX. platoon unblocked
"""~cl5 IC\I"9 vd1ufi'll> c'd:'::' ,"::J,.~ ".,..;. '.;..'..1'-r6'~' ,.."'. .1..'9'o~:'.'.~"i;.')j, '. :":'" . '"
S!~1.~~HHJJ~!,':;:':,t:~:t~::,;"'}f; , ....... ", ," __ _" _ .," .__.'1" 4- ' ,4V,- ,," J~J_" - ", - ~':>,;;.::~'t?i
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
y(9fj';:~t~g~.::g'_:~2tlf.yol-:;:.
vCu, unblocked vol
1:c.~~iFigi~'(sj . .~
IC.2 stage (s)
iF (sF :":'"; :'. '., 2,2 3"5 .
pO'queue free % 100 100
~t(,j Fa'p~ciiY (~e~/h), ..' 4561)9
~~,~-
voiume Left 0 6 0 0 0 0 "
VqiUm@'Rigfit 0 Jl 34 a d 50
cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 374
volume to capacity 0.42 :"o.~i .002' 029 d29 0,16
Queue Length 95th (It) 0 0 0 0 0 14 .
Cbhtrofbeiay(sj .0.0. ' 0.0 o,d 00 0.6 16.5
Lane Los c
Appf6"~tll D~lay {sj (j,0 0"0 16.~
~~~~ c
-,::'!b7tjiff;.1i:;r:'?:,:~;?~C :;: .
','-", ""'-';:" ,- ,.
'"~,'~;T'~?
. '::'~ ~~" :~"::;,~~~f/~:~~;i;':f.":
-"1',-,,'
,,; -"":'
i:'i;--'t::;'~Y~~~~::T:;",~~::\;':"
"':),~:~7Y:IL1i/:.tii' , ",:::~:?,
r.--:"''--''
,-. :':~~~~:f~~~~l
" >';'-<"
'-".''','
:'Y,:J!;~i:;;;'iji'.\ ~,
:_i;'::>7~:~(i
".,'
:;,,~;; '~\}n~}~,~'~1
"'":',--",",,,-
4.1
.<,-,,;)'
1923
6.8 .
~.:~
84
~K~l]tl)~Wii;Iif't~b\,-' ~ < ~~l,_"-~J._~.~ _" >~<_-':^'_ '~~~I~~ L~\_:c-. '~~~~,~'::t'<:_:
Average Delay
ibi@h~BjioncC~p~ciiy U!iiif~iibri
Analysis Period (min)
0.4
464%
15
leU Level bfseniice
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
Packet Page -1863-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
3: Oil Well Rd. & W. Site Access
2015 Sunday Peak Hour Volumes
-- ,.
~
-<I-
""
I"
~~~~~"~--
~~ml;~~~~~;;"'- ~,t'ril'"L",,,,~-~.~~, ..,~I<~-.... .t., ........... .'" -.... ......,, .. .."....-,."."" ""11
~~PJ~[j";..Jj,_~'I'~~,~'1~K,:fkt'~;;"')i:~t;' 0% >1m'. o~/, \~iiit,l,i@iif;!ll';;lffiri,J~8lS:;!;':;filljiltf"%:'i~""'0i4i.i':iil'lillt<it$1~~
~!J111m~D~~!:~J~%T~?f.i~fi:'(i~~~4~tlr~tfJB:~~W~if~i~7~}~q~t~;l)1:~\~~~~:~'~~i:,,5b;;t~~~~,;','::,~~;;.{~::k-;:'.-;,; ,',::' ~':,':':;~<~:':"-:'j;:;:.,~X:?1f~~
Peak Hour Factor'" ~...~ 0'.92" 0.92 .". 0.92-' 0.92 "'0.92 . 0192 ~ '.,- , -,.._," ....... ,,-,.., -''''
~~~fm1yB~JU~&jB~f~j1lt!t~~3j:~~~~,~l~B.~1l~~mji~~~;~~g~~\L~:i.~~,~oo2;t :?'~::t~~;:<\i!:~~)Jht; . ,,,,,:,,-'-\;~>:,"_;':;Y:0~i'~R~t:,~:~~;~;
Pedestrians
~!!I!li;~i'IDl:[(~jrii{;i;C2,. " :i'!r,;;",.- .i: ...:.;.1ii~J"
Walkin~ Speed (ftls)
~l2'~]tj;lfe'~~~:g~.;..... ,,_c.
Right turn flare (veh)
M~1!'~Hh:p!i, ..... .,Raised
Median storage veh) 2
QIl~li~ijii-i$i&h"Ttm .
pX, platoon unblocked
vg2pi5f1~iC\i699()iUm~ 7 4~ H~p 317.
vC1. stage 1 cont vol 635
vb2,s#@~ :12001vol 1S5
vCu. unbiocked vol 743 1420 317
le,sjh~le(s) 4.1 6.8 6.$
tC, :2 stage (s) 5.8
~ D 3~ ~
pO queue tree % 81 43 84
cM.i:apacity (vel1Jh) 873 287 684
~~~~~~~
Volurne Left 0 0 0 168 0 0 163 . 0
Volume Right 0 0 109 6 .0 0 . 6 109
~ 1~ 1~ 1~ rn 1~ 1~ ~ ~
Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.19 b.26 0.26 0.57 0.16
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 18 0 0 82 14
Cohtrol Delay (s) 00 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 32.9 11.3
Lane LOS BOB
Approach Deiay(s) OD 1.6 24.2
Approach LOS C
~::r~:eD~laY -------~y~-~~
intersection Capacity Utilization 43.0% leu Levelot Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
5: Oil Well Rd. & E. Site Access
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
2015 Sunday Peak Hour Volumes
-+ 't
.(
-+-
'\
I"
~IWI.~"W~_ ~L:.._ '~'l1'-l1\~~\ "'\'~A~' _~'\'l-,~I' ~ I~~ . i~~..iL-,-,.~_-,...i",,,"-,"-~ _,.: _..:.:':\~_, ....._~'!,
~~;~9i~~~i;iW!~I:~~~g~~,m~:G~~t~i;f~~~L1t.~~~i:~:z'~~~rli~~R~j~~t~~~m~m~,~<3~~~~~~,~Pii...:;~
Grade .. ~"....," .. 0% .,'_.~.,' .'" --... "'0% 0%"'" "" - ,. .- .,~.. -."...... n -'.',.., .
',::2,)i~)i:,\:'!t:,
.:%;:~rfl\'\':d~l/:':,;:Ti;::.r}t~~:S;l~WJ{Img~ti:;:\Y!~~?:~?~~:~{tB:~}~:, ~:[iiI:iiT~~JftA~tV:;,~;:~~I:~lt;)f-:?yt2i~p;~;;{:,.:;::'\jr~,:'< ,,~\,',; ',.' ,
.:;:i;tw.:;
;:,';,:":t,;,',-
" -;;".: ~-;;:,::
""':"'~.;J.
'.,.",
,F":,'~~
:."7(1:;;:,'
'~-~'" -.;
":>::f;\' i~f~t;)Cfl.~:T<
..', ,_ _,"".' 1.'~"',-
"',,
..,,'
-',"
,
i.:."':',',':','.'
~"~:t:l9~~L::':' '::{':?:~:~:;:i:'i: i:>.'
'::F:J,~',.'ff:,},:'>:;:':
,.<,.,'"
,'c'-,
, ;'''~
,:}<~:;:<-, ,," ;C',
. ,~:
-; ",,':743'
<JiS}. 'i~j: .
;\'. '~::cf:1':,:_
:~'i-::::'.:":
"'''., ,
.i2iz
100
. 35
100
3.3
92
0,0
Average Delay
i rii~'t:s~~Hq!r9~1~~6~y'Utfjlzatlon
Analysis Period (min)
03
27.4%
15
leU Level of service
A
Page 1
TR Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Metro Transportation
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
Packet Page .1865-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 8th EDITION
Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Sunday AM Peak Hour
Church I - 0.56 (X) I - 0.34 (X) + 5.24 I~9.11 (X) T - 0.61 (Xl
(LUC 560) (62% In/38% Out) (48% In/52% Out) (Based on Seats)
I - Irins, X - 1,000's of sauare feet of !!"ross floor area
Day Care Center I - 0.73 (X) + 5.24 Ln (I) - 0.87 Ln (X) + 0.32 I = 4.55 (X) - 5.64 N/A
(LUC 565) (53% 1n/47% Out) (47% In/53% Out)
I - Irins, X - # of students
Private School I~O.77 (X) + 19.92 I=0.17(X)
(K-12) I ~ 2.48 (X) N/A
.~ (LUC 536) (61 % In/39% Out) (43% In/57% Out)
- - Irips, X - # of students
~ General Office Ln(D- O.80Ln (X) + 1.55 I-1.49 (X) Ln(I)= O.77Ln (Xl + 3.65 N/A
(LUC 710) (88% In/12% Out) (17% In/83 % Out)
I I - Irius, X - t,OOO's sa. ft. of Gross Floor area
Packet Page -1867-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Enviromnental Assessment Report
of the
Emmanuel Lutheran Church +22 Acre Tract
Sec. 19, T48S, R28E, Oil Well Road
Golden Gales Estates, Collier County, Florida
March 26, 2007
Prepared for:
Hole, Montes, Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naples, Florida 341 10
Tel: (239) 254-2000 Fax: (239) 254.2099
and
Tom Gremmer
Emmanuel Lutheran Church
777 Mooring Line Drive
Naples, FL 34102
Conducted by:
Geza Wass de Czege~ President
Southern Biomes, Inc" \Voodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901
Tel: (239) 334-6766 Fax: (239) 337-5028
PUDZ-PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 6/3/10
DUE: 7/1/10
Packet Page -1869-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers. FL 33901 - mail to: P.O Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334.6766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239)337-5028
EAS Report for Emmaouel Lutheran Church :t22 Acre Tract, Section 19, T 48S. R28E, Oil Well Road, Collier
County. Fiorida Date: March 26. 2007
Location Map
2770 Oil Well Road (CR. 858), Golden Gate Estates. Collier County, Florida
.,: M"f>Q\.I[:'S'h.:
OL-...., .1ml
lkm
:
,
18461
."
I
f,'-
m
<
o
i3
[-
o
.~
'"
"
~
z.
Oi1WdlRd
.*
tl'alent:'fa:
""V
. C"'ltrsC!
ili~~~~e R~ ~
,
, .
e, 2005 M apQuest Ine
,
-~
.
g
'"
.,.
~
z
e2006 Nl'I VTEQ
Directions: Fro:-n Interstate 75, north of Naples, go east on lmmokalee Road (CR 846) for seven miles. Immokaiee
Road turns North after the Wilson Blvd. intersection. One mile north, turn east on Oil Well Road (CR 858), and go
approximately 2.5 miles. Property is on south side of road.
- 2-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
Southern Biomes, Inc,
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640. Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239) 337-5028
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church ;;22 Acre Tract. Section 19, T48S, R28E, Oil Well Road, Coliier
County, Florida Date: March 26, 2007
Environmental Assessment Report
Emmanuel Lutherral Church 22 acre Tract
See, 19, T488, R28E. Oll Well Road. Golden Gates Estates, Collier County, Florida
1. SITE LOCA nON: The subject property consists ofa a ,"22 acre parcels of land located on
the south side of Oil Well Road (County Road 858), approximately one half mile west of the
intersection of Everglades Blvd" in Golden Gate, Collier County, Florida. This tract ofland is
an irregular-shaped parcel, consisting of mostly cleared grasslands and minimally forested land,
with an existing man made lake. Surrounding the subject property in all directions are mixtures
of partially forested and cleared, or cleared, low density residential lots, with scattered home
sites.
2. VEGETATION MAP: A map of the vegetation associations, with the Florida Land Use and
Cover Classification System (FLUCCS) can be found in the attached report.
3. VEGET ATlON INVENTORY: TIle property is made up of four land cover types; abandoned
agricultural land, pine and palmetto flatwoods, and a borrow pond. The northem portion of the
property, along Oil Well Road, consists of two communities. A 1.6 acre single family
residence with a maintained yard and scattered landscape trees (FLUCCS code 110), and
approximately 1,7 acres of pine and saw palmetto forested area (FLUCCS code 411) with a
canopy of slash pine and midstory of saw palmetto, wax myrtle, and gallberry. The ground
cover is limited to open areas, because of the density of the saw palmetto, but where it exists, it
consists of wiregrass, broomsedge, xyris, pennyroyal, chocolate weed, chalky bluestem, and
other grasses and forbs.
The majority of the site, approximately 15.2 acres, has been previously cleared, and appears to
have been used for crop or pasture1and (FLUCCS code 211), because of the presence of ridges,
furrows, and ditches, which are typical of agricultural uses. This area is mostly void of canopy
and midslory vegetation, with the ground cover consisting of a mixture of ruderal weeds and
grasses such as Bahia grass, torpedograss, bunch paspalum, natal grass, hroomsedge, chocolate
weed, frogbit, xyris, pluchea, sedges, carpet grass, and wire grass. The predominant canopy or
subcanopy vegetation is the cabbage palm and saw palmetto clusters, which are clearly depicted
in the aerial photograph provided with this report. This area appears to be occasionally mowed,
or had li'iestock grazing, since the groundcover was low.
Also, there is a sizable borrow lake (FLUCCS code 530) in the southwest comer of the site that
is approximately 3,5 acres. This borrow pond has been reclaimed, and was vegetated along its
fringes witb assorted landscape trees, such as live oak, cypress, and acacia tree, A brief
description and dominant canopy, midstory, and ground cover are listed according to habitat
types identified on site.
- 3-
Packet Page -1871-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Southern Biomes, Inc,
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave.. Fort Myers. FL 33901 - marl to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers. FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239) 337.5028
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church:t22 Acre Tract. Section 19, T 488, R28E. Oil Well Road. Collier
County. Florida Date: March 26, 2007
UPLAt'ln COM.l\flJNITIES (:tI8.S Acres): There are three (3) upland communities associated
with the property. AU the communities showed some evidence of exotic invasion. The
following is a swnmary description of each community:
Single Family Residence -110: (1.6 acres) this cover type consists of a single family home,
drivevlay, sodded yard, and saw palmetto road buffer.
Pastureland - 211: (15.2 acrcs) this vegetative community dominates majority of the
property. The western portion appears to have been filled during the excavation of the
borrow lake, while the easterly portion stiU has the shallow, evenly spaced ditches used for
irrigation and drainage. A widely scattered canopy cover consists of occasional slash pine,
mela1euca, and cabbage palm. The midstory consists of scattered saw palmetto clusters,
Brazilian pepper, and wax myrtle. Grow1dcover is dominated by Bahia grass, carpet grass,
smutgrass. buttonweed, Bemludagrass, torpedo grass, natal grass, broomsedge, wiregrass,
ragweed, cida, and cratons.
Pine FIatwoods - 411: (1.7 acres) this community dominates the majority of the northern
fringe of the property. It consists of scattered pines with palmetto, dahoon holly, cabbage
palm, melaleuca and Brazilian pepper subcanopy. Other vegetation consists of gallberry,
rusty lyonia, beautyberry, brooms edge, grape vine, wiregrass, runner oak, and pennyroyal.
WETLAt"D/OSW COMMUNITIES (B,S Acres): There is oue (I) other surface water (OSW)
wetlanD comll1unjty associated with the property. This community consists of a reclaimed
borrow pit. The following is a summary description of this community:
Borrow Lake - 530: (3.5 acres) this open water community is located v.-ithin the
southwestern portion oftbe property, and is fringed by littoral vegetation consisting
primarily of torpedo grass, cattails, spikerush, and arrowhead.
HABITAT SUMMARY
CODE
110
211
411
530
DESCRIPTION
Single Family Residence
Pastureland
Pille Flatwoods
Bonow Lake
TOTAL
ACRES
1.6
15.2
1.7
3.5
ci22.0
- 4-
, 6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Southern Biomes, Inc,
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave.. Fort Myers, FL 33901 . mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239) 337-5028
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church:t22 Acre Tract. Section 19. T48S, R28E, Oil Well Road, Coliier
County, Florida Date: March 26,2007
4. Fish, Wildlife, Listed Species and their Habitats: The endangered species survey was
conducted on March 16,2007. The day was warm, in the mid 80s, windy, with scattered
clouds. Special attention was given to gopher tortoises, burrowing owls, wading birds, and
alligators, No listed endangered or threatened species were observed on the subject property,
The following describes the survey metbodology and results.
Endan!!ered Snecies Survey Methodolol!Y:
The entire project site bas been field surveyed for endangered species using a modification
of the transect linc metbods established by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC). The modified sUlvey methodology has proven effective in covering 90-
95% of the sites surveyed. The modified strip census uses meandering transect lines at 75' -
100' intervals. The meanders extend into adjoining transect lines to provide a near 100%
coverage. The frequency ofthe meanders is determined by the ground cover and visibility.
More densely vegetated areas receive a greater frequency of meanders, thus decreasing the area
between meanders in some habitats to as nears as 12' apart. If the terminus flagging markers of
the transect lines are not visible, then swvey flagging tape is attached to vegetation at the outer
extent of the transect meanders to mark the coverage area for that transect. The visibility of the
flagging tape assists in maintaining the transect direction, and is used as a gauge for determining
the frequency of meanders within a transect area. Each tape must be visible from the previous
meander, On the subsequent transects, the flagging tape is removed and relocated at the outer
limits of it's transect area.
Faunal species wbich do not lend themselves to the typical transect line survey
methodology typically used for determining stationary floral and faunal species, require an
additional method of observation. These species can be best observed by using game stalking
techniques and periodic observations with ficld glasses at frequent intervals along transect lines.
The frequency and duration of observations are determined by habitat density, species observed,
and the stalking skills ofthe observer. The ability to blend into the surroundings is another key
requirement for success.
- 5 -
Packet Page -1873----
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Southern Biomes, Inc.
Djvlsion of Environmental Information Services
1602 Woodford Ave.. Fort Myers. FL 33901 - mail 10: P.O. Box 50540. Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-5766 Geza Wass de Czege. President FAX (239) 337-5028
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church ,,22 Acre Tract. Section 1 g. T 48S, R28E. Oil Well Road. Collier
County, Florida Date: March 26, 2007
Any species observed were noted on an aerial photograph as to location .~d number of
species sighted. Species presence and abundance on a given site cannot be determined for all
species listed. Therefore, fauna which are mobile, transient, or deceptive are not always
observed during a typical field survey such as required by Collier County. This is especially
true for species abundance. Therefore, the status of each species is listed as to presence and
numbers observed, and those species which can be reasonably surveyed for abundance is
provided with such data,
Habitats Surve\'ed:
Code
110
211
411
530
Observed
Suecies
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
Description
Single Family Residence
Pasture land
Pine flatwoods
Borrow Lake
Endangered Species Observations:
Below are listed species that are typically expected to be observed withio the habitats identified
on the project site, or similar habitats within Collier County. Observation notes and comments
are ll1ade on each species.
Endangered Species Expected to be Observed on Similar Habitats
UPLAND SPECIES:
Common Nnme Scientific Name Obs.
Eastern indigo snake DI"yma/'chol1 cora/s coupcri no
gopher lori.oise GopheniS pO~lphemlls nl)
gophc-r frog Rana areolata no
S'eastem American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus no
Ame-riccrl bald eagle; HaUaetus /eucocepJJa/us no
BUITO\\ling owl Speof)'ro cunivu/aria no
Least tern Sterna anli/ial"lll11 no
Fox squirrel Sciunl.s niger no
t"\visled air plimt Tillandsio.f!exuosa no
Florida coontie Zamia Floridano no
Red-cockaded woodp;:cker Picoides borea/i.\' no
Comments
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observe-d
not observed
Dot observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
not observed
~ 6 -
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Southern Biomes, Inc,
Division of Environmentallnforrnation Senrices
1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640. Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-6766 Ge~a Wass de CZSge, President FAX (239) 337-5026
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church :1:22 Acre Tract, Section 19, T 488. R28E, Oil Well Road. Coilier
County, Floticta Date: March 26, 2007
Endangered Species Expected to be Obscrvcd on Similar Habitats (cont,)
WETLAND SPECIES:
Common Name
American alligator
Eastern indigo snake
Little blue heron
Snowy egret
Tricolored heron
VYhite This
Wood stork
Everglades mink
Scientific Name
Alligalor mississippiensis
Drymarchon corais cOllperi
Egreua cae:rulea
Egretto lhula
Egretta tricolor
Eudocimus albus
Mj;cleria americana
Musrela vision evergladeJ7siJ
Obs. Comments
no nol observed
no not observed
no not observed
no not observed
no not. observed
n,D not observed
no Dot observed
no inappropriate habitat
Discussion and Conclusion:
As previously noted, no endangered, threatened, or species of special concern were observed on
the property during any of the listed species surveys. Special attention was given the gopber
tortoise and burrowing owls in the uplands, and wading birds along the lake fringe. Because the
area is completely isolated from all other undeveloped natural areas, and is snrrounded by a
network ofroadviays and residential developments, it is considered inaccessible and undesirable
habitat for any large size listed species, either for foraging or nesting, and as expected, none
were observed.
5, L"IDIGENOUS HABITAT: Tbe only remaining indigenous habitat consists ofa 1.7 acre pine
and palmetto flatwoods community (FLUCCS code 411), located along the northern fringe of
tbe property. A portion of the indigenous habitat is gro"'~ng on top of an old agricultural belID,
which fringes the pasture area (FLUCCS 211), and would lead one to believe, from the size and
type of vegetation, that the agricultural clearing activity may have occuned more than 25 years
ago.
6. SOILS: The entire site is made up of Immokalee fine sand soils, an upland soil of flatwoods
communities.
- 7 -
__._~ Packet Page -1875-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Southern Biomes, Inc,
Division of Environmental Information Services
1602 WoodforD Ave., Fort Myers. FL 33901 - mail to: PO. Box 50640. Fort Myers, FL 33994
Ph. (239) 334-6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President FAX (239) 337"5028
EAS Report for Emmanuel Lutheran Church :!:22 Acre Tract. Section 19, T48S, R28E, Oil Well Road. Collier
County, Florida Date: March 26, 2007
Vegetation Map
HA.BITAT SUMMARY
CODE
110
2] 1
4]]
530
DESCRIPTION
Single family Residence
Pastureland
Pine flatwoods
Borrow Lake
TOTAl
ACRES
1.6
]5.2
1.7
3.5
",22:0'
- 8-
?).iP ~j~...
~~>. '~. '~^..
i;;"'~~P~
L?' 'i-~,'t;~'~r.t...
..... "'~,:".,~
:d...... ;.-.<:;,... ~,...-
. ~r~--:~'-'~: . ~
6/28/2011 Item 17,8.
PUDZ.PL2EOL09E-V2~~6G:J~:L CHURCH
EMMANU
DATE: 613110
DUE: 711110
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 5T A TE
Kurt S, Brovming
Secretary of Stale
DlVISlON OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Mr. Ge7.a Wass de Czege
Southern Biomass. Inc.
1602 Woodford Avenue
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
March 19, 2009
Rc: DHRNo.:2009-1316
Rec",~vcdhyDHR:Marchl.3L200'2 '" .
. Enlmanucl LUtneran Church ,t22 Acres Tract
2770 Oil Well Road (C,R. 858)
Naples, Collier County
Dear Mr. Wass de Czcge:
In accordance with the procedures contained in the Collier County's Natural Features Inventory
requirements, we reviewed the referenced parcel for possible impact to cultural resources (any
prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in
the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise ofhistorical, archaeological, or
architectural value, .
Our rcvicw of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or
historical resources arc recorded within the project area, Furthennorc, because of the location
and/or nature of the project it is unlikely that any such site will be affected.
If there are any questions concerning our conunonts or recommendations, pleasc contact
Katherine P<::terson, Historic Sitos Specialist, by phone at (850) 245-6333, or br electronic mail
at kdpetersonfa>dos.state.fl,us. We appreciate your continued interest in protcctmg Florida's
historic propcnies.
Sinccrely,
~'" Q. ? G:.Jl-
Frederick P, Gaske, Director, and
State Historic Preservation Officer
SOD S, Bronough Street . T.n<<h.'.... FL 32399.(J250 . htlp:l/www.nherltage.com
CJ Dire-ctof's Offi<<- a Archacologial Reseatth 1m Historl( l~liervation
(S5<l) 245-6:lOO' FAX: Z4!;-64.'06 (S5<llZ.5-&..... FAX:Z4;.&lSZ (850) Z-l5-6:\3..~' FAlG'~~,7,
Packet Page -1877-____. .
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
'"''.'~t..''..'''''
~~;.: .,::
~ t . c.
(S-"':
~.;:~. \;/ -
.'-;~'''''' ";
IHMI
HOLE MONTES
_-llJlllJlS.!l.Il\t1lllS
950 Encore Way
Napl.., rL. 34110
Phon.: (239) 254-2000
rlorlda Certlflcat. of
Authorization No.1 n2
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
VEGETATION MAP
AND AERIAL
EXHIBIT V.C.1
Packet Page -1879-
[f.) t:q'-:~~I'"
UJ.....I:O.....N.....
c:: r N
U
<(
W
U
a:: Z
<( W CIl
~ZQClClW
~oSlZ8~
:JFc::~<:::J...J
0- WF-"'<(
(/) ;::; >- c:: ... ", f-
~:!::l..lOO
'I-U::Ef-u..C::f-
. <( CIl <( CIl c::
I- ~u..<(WO
- O-Zm
'm W -
<( ...J 0-
J: ~
Cii
O~lo r r 0
...............('1)
U.....N~L.O
b
o
N
:"
W
...J
<(
U
CIl
CHEOCED BY;
R.L.D.
OR....'fflI! BY:
JON
OATt :
03 09
PROJECT No.
2006.096
CAD FlU; NANE;
vet SOILS MAP'
EXHIBIT - nEW
5A OF 7
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
fJ.fL
tM
lIIHIIISiUIIIIIS'_
1150 Encore Way
NaJ"." FL 3<1110
Phon.: (2311) 254-2000
,Iarida C.rtlflcat. of
Authorization No.I772
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
SOilS MAP
AND AERIAL
EXHIBIT V.C.1
1l../l..IJi.<,!V:j lJ:I.~::I 1c.L, tlZ~lt:::Ol:U:l
H ~ LAND DEVELOPKEHT
C01N~T County
--~
+ CCTY ADDR:C-C'(lTW" n. "''''''"' J"'A'"
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
WWW.COlLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DI<IVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239} 252-2400 fAX (2S9) 25:a-5724
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for exlsting projecls/sJles only)
SDP -_ orAR#_
Project or tievelopmenl nI'",,,s proposod for, or already appe,lring i~, COManlinlum documents (if appllo&\ion;
indlca!e whether proposed or exl.ling)
-
.. .~_.,,~
Piease Check One:
12l Checkli"1 is to De faxed Dack
o Personally Picked lip
APPLICANT NAME: TOBI CHARBONNEAU FOR BOB DUANE
PHONE 254-2021 Fr-:r. 254-2099
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Projeot andlor Street Name approval
and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department.
W~_
_.~.
---
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
flN Number (F'rimary) 39 '69 Go L\-O 0. oc:.r
Folio Number 39l59l -SZ. C2..90-]__ sC;1?5'1i Go,oot oS
FoliO Number ~q<69r:C,::> 2'-0 I O_*-_ 39.g91C-..,q.. 0000.
Folio Numbor 39<691 S,Coooo9 3")<69912-000-1
;~,o\<6"1i0D Dbo~ '3,'1 <6"99 i Cc.,oao 'f
Approved by: .,Q \"\.. ~<S
YY\...IS~ 'Y"\
Oat,,:
1c....-Z-\-09
Updatc>d by:
Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Packet Page -1881-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
12/21/2008 08:29 TEL 82542099
H M L~NO DEVELOP~ENT
. CCTV ADDRES~8 141001/003 . !
1/!; \ Il.!f~i
/\:i~- ~.~-
r
cOm~l' CoUl1ty
~~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
WWW.COj.L1ERGOV.NET
2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239j 252-2400 FAX (239) 252.5724
ADDRESSiNG CHECKliST
1"1"')5e complete the following and fnx to \h~ AOdmssing Department at 239.252-5724 or submit In por~on to tho
Addressing Department lilt Ihe obQve odd rOSS, Form must be siormd bv Addre~"i"o oecoonnel prior 10 "rs-
(JIJDlic8ttOil mce-tinCl. phaase anow 3 days for proe~sBlnQ.
Nol 811 items will spply to every project lie"",, In bold type are required. FOLIO NUM8ERS MUST 8E
PROVIDED. Forms older thliln 6 months will requim additioMt11 roview r;lnd ~pprovai by the Adch~ssil1g
Departm"'nL
~, .- ...
PETITION TYPE (Indicota type below, aomplote iiI separate Addressing Cneel,ild fer ",'on Potition type)
o Bl.. (BI".lir,g P,mnit)
o SD (80al DOCK Exlensinn)
o Cnrnlval/CirctJs Parmi(
o CU (Condilion~1 Use)
o EX? (Exc.v;'lUon Perrl'"l)
o FP (Final Pial
o LLA (Lol UncAdlu5lment)
[] PNC (Project Name Ch''''9'')
o PPL IPI,m~ 5. PIHt R0v;c:w)
[J PSP (Pr"llmil1ary Subdivision Plall
[8] FUD Rezone
[] RZ (St"noord Re~onul
o SD? (Sile Developm"nl Plan)
[] SDPA (5DP Arn~ndme(l() ,
o SDPI (Insubstantial Chong", 10 SD?)
o SIP (Silo Irnprovcn1Cnl Plan)
[] 511'1 (JI1Su!:lSt~nli31 CIlange 10 SIP)
o SNR (Street N.me Ch3nge)
[] SNC (Street Norne Change.- Unp1t1tled)
o TOR (Trmn.f"" of Development Right,)
[] VA (Vcori<ll1ce)
U Vi,? iVegetulion Removal Permit)
o VRSFP (Vegelulion RBmov81 & Sit~ Fill Permit)
o OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy desqriprlon fTI~Y be ott"ched) J
.... ,I
S191T431R28 (GaL_DEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 64. TRACTS 65A. 80, aOA, 81, 81A. 96 AND
96A
FOllO (Property 10) NUMSER(s) of ~bova (~ttJch 10, or "sSDcbto witl1, logal descriptlDn if marl! than one)
;t ....
39896040009,39897520007,39897520104. 39697560009. 39897600008,39897600105,
39897640000,39899120007 ,lI.ND 39899160009
STi=1.EET f\DCRESS or ADDRESSES (os applic,'ble, if slrwedy assigned)
PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF all WELL ROAD. APPROXIMATELY
1/4 MILE WEST OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD
. LOCATION MAP must be atttlchod showing exact lo-:::.~t.1on of proj~otJsjte in Tt~la~ion lo n(f.;:H~.si public road right-
of-w<lY
. SURVEY (copy - neoded only for unplalled prop~rd",s)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (If oppliGiilble)
EiylMANUEL _EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH PUD REZONE
PROPOSED STREST NAMES lif "ppJlc.,blo)
PUDZ-PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 6/3/10
DUE: 7/1/10
Coli.,. County
- ~-- -
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
.-' COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
. .!K1 PUP Rezone (PUDZ)
..0 PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ-A)
DpUD Amendment (PUDA)
PL#
~LfqG
Date: \ -[3-10 Time: 10'30 Firm:
Project Name: E.KHAflOt::"L Ll./iHUAtJ CA-lli12.CI-/
Applicant Name: --=Bob buoM.
Size of Project Site: d;2 AC
acres
Phone:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Owner Address:
City
State
ZIP
Existing PUD Name and Number -1J I A
Assigned Planner_K A. Y 1) ES E u::::1J\
'\[11 -toCWUD
Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign-In sheet)
I JIIIeeting Notes
~D "'-} ~ IVt1'JbM\ 'PERMIT -SEE S11\tJ r _~/ 4ues4[l1\~
UI1L!1V r tJRJeJr~\17)(\j- (' .nWiACl ZA.lv\-(f?A D
W ora if, l --Grr cVl.uJ'c k-
ctr.e,fr:ert:.i1C~ , "
~JL;u;(()()rn</I~)7 tPr(,\/iJe.t'~_ l..oc seediG," fjcr ~r.." (.,y:(:fr'{)JIG/J. )uhJ.?1,j
I . I! / <J . 1 /
~ It. f. '>t-"\:A. 5, CI"> IS lu'("51':/1/"-1-'(y1 y", uKmC1J
fl.
PUDZ_PL2009-2496 REV:1
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL CHURCH
DATE: 6/3110
DUE: 7/1110
Packet Page -1883-
Co~r County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT, OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
PUD te PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA)
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW
W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION, NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED,
E
QJ
~
:1 REQUIREMENTS #OF REQUIRED NOT
COPIES REQUIRED
I STANDARD REQUIREMENTSi"'. . .. = c'.
1 Additional set if located in the BayshorejGateway Triangle v"'"
Redevelopment Area)
1 Additional set for School Board Review (if contains residential components)
Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary 24 V
Completed Application (download from website For current form) 24 ,/
Pre-application meeting notes 24 ./
PUD Document & Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 V2" x , lit copy 24 ,/
Revised Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 Yi" x , 1" copy 24 ,/
Original PUD document and Moster Plan 24" x 36" 24 V
ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 24 V
Revised PUD document w/amended Title page ';-;ord #'s, LDC lO.02.13.A.2 24 V
Deeds/Legars -& S~) . E:., .(if L_",.,,..J, , f 9 i~il'l.:ll nl In . "'~. Jil,..J~ 3 V'
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ,/
Owner/Affidavit signed & notarized 2 /
Covenant of Unified Control 2 J
Completed Addressing checklist ,\jl~{~\~; ~~1J /,2 ,/-- -----
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)'" o(exemption iustificationy'rr?~_~;""'eJ01 -~ y/ )-/
Digital/electronic copy of EIS ~ 1 if
Historical Surveyor waiver request 4 AS tJWSS/N
Utility Provisions Statementwf~!,':l,J,e~ 4 V
Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 f\( fA
Survey, signed & sealed 4 ,/
Trcffic lmpact Statement (T\S) or waiver (with applicable fees) 7 ..,(
Copy of Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) on CORaM 3 ,.c
Aerial photographs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scaled 1 "=200'), V
showing FLUCCS Codes, Legend, and project boundary 5
Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CORam or Diskette) 1 ,/
Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the 24 /'
application materialj DO NOT include it in the PUD documents)
Copies of Official Interpretations and/or Zoning Verifications 1 V
'j
r'
f"\'f
V
a:l
r--
......
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
ColM... County
- ~ --
6/28/2011 Item 17.B,
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT, OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
A.ffo,rd~~le,ti'Q,,~i~~' ~r Ec:~"o,~~~ D~~~I~p.,!,_ent; C.~,\I~,c~,1 'Pr.oi~~,t~:: . ............... ....
0 EDC "Fast Track" must submit approved copy of official 2
application
0 Affordable Housing "Expedited" must submit copy of signed
Certificate of Agreement.
'**If proiect includes an Affordable Housing component, you are required to.schedul
a meeting before the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee by contacting the
Irollier County Housina and Human Services Department at 239-252-2273.
n If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivino land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Locavera, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.o.(b)i.c.
n If located within 1h mile of City of Nanles, send CODV of ~ubmittal oockaoe to:
Robin Singer, Planning Director
City of Naples
295 Riverside Circle, Naples, FL
Fees:
~
~
~
~
EQ
rJ
o
Application Fee:
34102
~ $10,000 (PUO Rezone) + $25 per acre [or fraction of thereof)
o $8,000 [PUD to PUO) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
0$6,000 (PUD Amendment) + $25 per acre (or fraction of an acre)
$150,00 Fire Code Review / $100 for PUOZ-A
$2,250,00 Comprehensive Pianning Consistency Review
$500,00 Pre-application fee
(Applications submitted 9 months or more alter the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be
credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required.
$925.00 Legal Advertising Fee for cepe meeting
$500,00 Legal Advertising Fee for Bee meeting
(advertising costs are to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily News).
:::::>{i\ lJ.--'y h e, ~,c,rY'
$2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee ---./ ~'{.-"r< 1 13 s)
$1 OOQ.,..O.G-l:iSted or ProTecTed"Sp'eci~ n,>vi,..\AI f,..p (when an EIS is not requi~
Property Owner Notification fees. Property Owner Notifications
$1,50 Non-certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail
(to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning & Development Review)
Attach a Separate Check for Transnortation Fees, (Refer to Exhibit A),
gj $500.00 Methodology Review Fee, if required
'Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting
Fee Total $
PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW:
Comments should be forwarded to the Planner prior to the due date
SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS & REC Did IClt:V VI(jC( A.t1MAD
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS vi' City of Naples - Robin Singer I,J/+1
DR/EM1 - EMER. MGMT - Jim Von Rinteln / IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT INtj
CDES Coordinator - Route Sheet Only ;/ Utilities Engineering - Zamira Deltoro V
Packet Page -1885-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
Co1N!'Y County
- ~~ ~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT, OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS tDC 10.03,05 F.
Applicant must conduct ot least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and
comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission.
Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification
from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05,B.8,
Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are
impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified.
A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the
Zoning Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (1 O) days prior to the
scheduled date of the NIM.
The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably
convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient
size to accommodate expected attendance.
The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices
and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and legible site location
map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one~
fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in
the County at least seven (7) doys prior to, but no sooner than five (5) doys before, the NIM,
The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the NIM and shaJl serve as the facilitator of
the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject
property.
The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the
Zoning Department.
As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to
writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning Department. These written
commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a
part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval.
RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at its expense shall
record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or
Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the
land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in
the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the
recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided
to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said
Memorandum or Notice.
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
NOTES
(Ol-flrre-lu...>I'II€ r~11ni/l8 CBe.-th 1""'/}): 1},~~ P~1tU 1> no-/; (ONI'>f~-i vij{
Js-~ 6-~r, 1)..;\ ~f -f;~ 5fte of 6-^'? I1-JN--{; cf- 7.007-7, w)..:u!...]5'
5cherLuk~-::rt Fcc --r;v.fI)""\~(, ~H~ 0/1 c10Vl. /9, z-ol(J, .t!utfre
..th~ re.-rlles-f. ).> (0 ,,-ti1je...t, ""ron o.-.!pllVqL of.-t:k G~P JJ~+,
,\:\J'.,!lR'~\ ~q, \ -PRo. \~ 'N-f\ME \..\~ A..~~\J~
T~.v I N"G - 61 W-G-u... 'Ro~ ~ItW
ON' ...~ 5>tf'SHln4L. ~nf\.q.cr
_fJe'7 (c7L.."..... f.::,'1-tSZ'~19 tv ~LAI:J
J,~~ ~\G.ti-7'T0W /A1'lt: P lA"'/~
If ~ ',So ~lhl2Q:::. _ ,4)<;.D -
~ "'-IV T4-lC-\^'6S
ON Tl-\.&- <f'\.fD M"l","'~ 'YlgltJ I
~ ~"'s..9'Of2.'T,I:o..Tltl"";
"f&>ii,.:;
't1AlJ>,
ZON ",JG- - "P.go\..J\.j)/- II\lFoIAATloU ~ IO\+\ox-
,
~
Packet Page -1887-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
782- 7~
Ap:p
LOC Requirement 10,02,13,A,1 I '//NoINA COMMENT
The title of the Droject ./' I V-
I
Name of the deve100er {/ /
Scale ,/ V
Date ./ y
North Arrow ,/'" /
Boundariesofthesubjectprooerty ./" /
All existing streets (7
All existing pedestrian systems within the site 1[/" .:'f
Existing watercourses, v
Existing easements ;rft >M?-" 1'1
land uses of abutting property, i/
zoning districts of abutting property :.....-
book and page numbers of abutting platted IV.,rt-
. parcels I
section lines, I ..t-..4
other important physical features within the I .
proposed development ._ i {",,;f
I other important physical features adioining the 1/lri'T
proposed development
Identification of all proposed trac.ts or
increments illustrating boundaries within the /,-' ...$.
/"./ '....;
PUD such as, but not limited to:
residential; ,/'C--,,/-
office and retail; commercial r I
industrial; I I
institutional; I ~. II' -
I
conservation/preservation 1 I:
lakes and/or other water management I Ii
facilities "
I , -' ,
common open space I ,-y I
,
types of buffers ---t-/
Viith a cross-section for any buffer I I
which deviates from that which is '"..; ,A I
otherwise required by the land I ,v.'n I
,- ,
I
develooment code; I
I the location of all areas proposed for ! V ' I
dedication or to be reserved for community i IJ. .. t""....
, ,/ ./
and/or oublic use; I
The function of all areas proposed for 1 I
dedication or to be reserved for community I /C/- .r ;
i
,
and/or oublic use , 1
Areas proposed for recreational uses I I
/~~ i
including golf courses and related facilities " I
--.-.--J
PUD Master Plan Review checklist 5/8/09
Page 1 of 3
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
LOC Requirement 1Q,Q2,13.A.1 "//NoINA COMMENT
Provisions for ownership, operation, and A/-It Done as part of the SDPIP1at
maintenance processes by the COA
All non-residential trac.t dimensions shall be A/',.,-
illustrated on the master plan
All non-residential tract boundaries shall be /'" . 1-
illustrated on the master plan
Identification of all proposed and permitted 'V
land uses pursuant to section 2.03.06 of this
Code within each tract or increment describing:
acreage k "'f I~ ..#""dJOl'.r.?:-.l~ /74
proposed number of dwelling units r 1/ ~A r.."... ,;- "<'
proposed density t/'~ ~ -.....
percentage of the total development
represented by each type of use
in the case of retail commercial
the acreage
maximum gross leasable floor area
in the case of industrial
the acreage
maximum gross leasable floor area
in the case of institutional
the acreage
maximum gross leasable floor area
in the case of office commercial
the acreage /'
maximum gross leasable floor area V 1'""1 !Pin'"./, F t?~~r;r .
;-
Identification of all proposed and permitted ~
land uses pursuant to section 2.03.06 of this V
Code within each tract or increment describing:
an outline ofthe proposed building t/' C(7q(,,?/4-r-~ @r7^t /
footprint
an indication of the proposed building 1/"
height for each structure within the I
individual tracts or increments
The location (as appropriate) of all existing /1 " f hi'''/;. 0.1'
drainage, water, sewer, and other utility /V. 4- .
provisions
The size (as appropriate) of all existing
drainage, water, sewer, and other utility I-vrrr /2/1/ ?2-r, / .s.,;L; ? 7"
provisions
The location of all proposed major internal ~ k'r1' /Z1fJ C-a?."'f.--~c~@..../
thoroughfares including interconnec+;
roadways 'ivitnin the PUD __I I
as well as with abutting uses i
I-
)df;,
PUD Master Plan Review checklist 5/8109
Page 2 of 3
Packet Page -1889-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
LDC Requirement 1Q,Q2.13,A.1 ,(/No/NA COMMENT
The location of all proposed maj or pedestrian T -~ (/p/./ /-f?-';?/ 8 t.tc;4h e;
accesswavs, including interconnectincr
roadways within the PtJD "
.
as well as with abutting uses I
Typical cross sections of all major, collector, I if/" 4-
and local streets, public or private, within the
PUD !
Within 1,500 feet of the proposed PCD 1
location of proposed: I
I roads .
,
rights-of-way 1, V- tP ;, .t' ?-.;..--eCq ..4 p ~ d
pedestrian systems /1/ . A- i ~~r/..,,- f'-} ,><r r
Within 1,500 feet of the proposed PTJD the l~J ~ t/Ci'/>
location of existine:: ,Yt-J /,J J h ~
roads
rights-of-way , l
pedestrian systems ,
i
overall acreage for the PUD f ~
overall proposed gross density for the PUD
Information on Previous and recent uses ofland ! //.,.1-
Proposed vehicular ingress and egress points ,-
Any other relevant information determined
to be necessary by the planuing services ,
,
denartment director i
, i
The zoning and land development reviewi
department director may exempt a petitiou
from certain required elements for the PUD
master plan pursuant to section 10.02,12 of I
this Code when the petition contaius condi-
tions, which demonstrate that the element
may be waived without a detrimental effcct
on the health, safety and welfare of the
community, All exemptions shall be noted
within the PUD submittal and provided thc I
Board of County Commissioncrs,.._..~ ... !
I ,
.---"
f
~
"P""'''''
~4--'
PUD Master Plan Review checklist 5/8/09
Page 3 013
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Memorandun1
To:
Planners
From:
Susan M. Istenes, AlCP, Director
Department of Zoning and Land Development Review
Date:
October 7, 2008
Subject:
Conditional Uses for Places of Assembly
Recent applicants for Conditional Use's for places of assembly such as churches have not
provided consistent data regarding the range and scope of proposed uses on site. In order to more
accurately evaluate the impacts of a church use or any place of assembly it is important to have
an accurate and complete understanding of the range of uses planned for the site in order to
accurately evaluate the impacts of the proposed use on surrounding properties, traffic, utilities,
pursuant to the requirements of the LDC. So that we remain consistent and accurate in our
analysis, please collect the follov.>ing data when analyzing an application for conditional use or
rezoning for any place of assembly (churches and other houses of worship; civic social and
fratemal organizations, private clubs, private assembly halls, COWltry clubs, etc).
1. Hours of operation
2. Days of operation
3. Number of seats (where applicable)
4. Total number of members and/or users
5. Total number of different groups using the site (for churches - number of congregations;
for clubs number of different clubs)
6. Location, square footage and proposed use for each structure on site (principal and
accessory)
7. Number of meetings and days and times
8, Identify all Principal and Accessory Uses to occur on site (for example accessory day
care, educational classes, food service, etc).
9. Any planned special events (annual fund raisers, holiday celebrations, etc).
10. Complete Trip Generation information.
Regarding Churches and traffic generation, the ITE Manual (the older 5th Edition) defines
churches as follows:
Packet Page -1891-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
"A church is a building providing public worship services, and generally houses an assembly hall
or sanctuary, meeting rooms, classrooms, and occasionally dining, catering, or party facilities for
special events."
The trip rates are based on statistical averages taken from actual traffic counts for the different
land uses studied. The ITE traffic studies for a church do take into account the site generated
traffic on a weekday as well as'on Saturdays and Sundays. The trip rates are different for each of
these categories with the Sunday hip rate the highest generator,
These studies have been conducted at churches throughout the USA. However, as more and more
churches start leasing space to other denominations and churches increasingly add other
functions such as fund raising events, it will take time for the ITE trip generation to reflect these
new functions. Therefore, we will require additional trip generation data to cover the proposed
project beyond what is covered in the ITE manual in order to get an accurate traffic count. This
would include separate trip generation calculations for related uses such as private schools
operated by the church as well as regular church store hours if open to the public on a daily basis.
If the activities on the proposed church site are accurately reflected in the Manual, then there is
no need for further evaluation in the TIS by the applicant. You may ask Ray to assist you \vith
making that determination.
Community Development and Environmental SelVices
Office of the Administrator
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
Tobi Charbonneau
- l?rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
meetings@colliergov.net
Monday, December 28, 2009 10: lOAM:
Tobi Charbonneau
Your meeting has been assigned
Dear Tobi Charbonneau for Bob Duane,
Your meeting request 6213 for folio 39896040009 of type Rezone has been scheduled on
01/13/2010 at 10:30am.
Your principal contact for this meeting is Deselem, Kay who can be reached at 252-2931 or
KayDeselem~colliergov,net,
Please use 6213 when referring to this meeting,
You may 'check your meetings at http://apps.colliergov,net/commdev/meetings/lookup,cfm by
entering your email address,
Thank You,
The Meeting Request System
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records, If you do not want your e-mail
address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this
entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing,
1
Packet Page -1893-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
CO
N
--
to
12/21/2009 08:25 TEL 52542099
. CCTV ADDRESSINi ~OOl/003
H M LAND DEVELOPMENT
~r~:l' UUl1ty
,=",~~~n,,"""-''''''~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
WWW,c;.9J,b.l[!illQVNET
2S00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA :>4'104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
ADDRESSiNG CHECKlrST
Plt"'loe compl~'le the following and iax to Ihl!> AOdrGssing Departmont at 239.252-5724 or womltln pcr30n \0 the
AddresEing Oep3rtmenl ~,t tr1l~ ob~)ve oddrCSS. rorrn mu:;t be shm(~d bv Addre~f,ir,o 00rs()f'nE~1 prior to ore.
i!.Q.I2.L~CltiOr"\ mootina. phaase allow 3 days for prooe.sslnQ,
N(ll all items will "Ppty to every project. Items in bold type are r"",uired. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED, Forms door th~m 6 months will requ:m additiom.ll rDvit::!w ~nd .(]pprov';'11 by the Addrt$sing
Oopartlne:;L
-- ~.. ..~-..
PETITION TYPE (Indic;;JtG typo b"low. compl~te 0 separato Addressing Chooirlisf for o"c:h POlliion typal
o 51.. (BI""Uog Ptmnit)
o BD (Boat Dock Exlfmsi(ln)
o C~lrnlv81/Circus Permil
o CU (Condllion:!1 Use)
[J EXP (Exc"v~lion Pr;,mil)
o FP (Finoj Plel
o LLA (Lot Line Adju3tmcm)
o PNC (Project Narn(., Ct1::'nr;g(>~)
o PC'\. (PI'H', & Plt.1 R'lvi,.w)
D PSP (PrlOllmtllary Subdivision ?1~tI
[8;J PUD Rezone
o RZ (S\ondord Rozon,,)
DSDP (Site DElveloprmml Pllln)
o SI?PA (StlP AmemJrnl'ol) ,
o SDPI (Inswostantl"l Ch"ng~ to SDP)
o SiP (Sile Irrlprovt>mcnt pian)
o SIPI (Ins"ostantial Cllange to SIP)
o SNR (StrBel N.me Chsnl'le)
o SNC (Slrect Nome Cll"nge.. Unr>I;.lIed)
o TDR (Transfer of Development RI~hts)
o VA (V,,,iilllce)
U V;~P (Vegct~ltjon RcmovOI Permit)
[] VRSFP (Vegetation l,omov~1 & Site Fill PefTT1:t)
o OTHi::R
~,~.."-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subJDct propcr:y or propcr\1cs (copy of iengthy desqription rmy bo attached) V
v v'
S12/T48/~.f~ (GOL.I)EN Gi\TE ESTATES UNIT 64. TRACTS 65A. 80, BOA, 81, 81A, 96 AND
8M
FOLIO (Property 10) NUMBER(s) (If above (.9tI:Jc/llo, or as[,Qcl~t. wirn, logal description ii more thl.lf1 one)
;,I j
39896040009.39897520007,39897520104 39897560009. 39897600008, 39S979.001.Q_5~
3989"[640000.39899120007 AND 39899160009
STI'(EET t\DDFt;SS or 1'.DIJRf.SSES (as tlPpiicabl(J, if ilJrMcfy@ssignod)
PROPERTY IS LOCA1:I'=OQN THE SOUTH SIDE OF Oil WELL ROAD. APPROXIMATELY
1/4 MilE WEST OF EVERGLADES BOULEVARD
. LOCATION MAP must be l'ittachod showing ~XiJct iO:::;:!1:::m af Pfoj~ctJl;ite iil Tel~-1lion lo f1(~arest pl.l~}li': ~oad right-
of.way
. SURVEY (copy - need"d ooly lor 'Jnpiatled prop~rti",")
PROPOSED PROJECT ~J'!\ME (if opplicablc)
~MJy1ANUE,b._EV,6.NGE,k!.fAL LUTHERf;jN Cfj.lJ8.PH'_L.!D REZONE
PROPOSED STREET NAIv1ES (ir C1PpJic~bJc;r)
,. t" I.nnu UL..'{!:l..Ur~lt:111
+ CC I Y WDRESSING ~ 002/003
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
C01f~T County
......--......""---""-
COLLIER COUi'lTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
WWW.COlLlERGOV.NET
;:800 NORTH HOl'1SESIiOE DI'<IVE
NAPL"s, FLORIDA 34104
{239} 252-2400 FAX (239) Z5Z-5724
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (ror ~xjsling projects/sites only)
SDP _ orAR.n
Project Of development MlnM~$ propos-cd fort or ;~lrca.dy ;.Jppr;:;~rir~g il'1, condamil1lum documeMts (if appllo.ElUon;
indicate wheth"r proposod Of existing)
-
,M....._M....._.''''~,_
Plea~ct Check One:
o Ch""klisl is 1(, be Fa",d back
o Personally Plckod Up
APPL.ICANT NAME; TOBI CHARBONNEAU FOR 80B DUANE
PHONE 254-2021 FAX 254-iillE2
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not conetitule Project and/or Street Name approval
and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department.
- ~~~
.- ,.,,~..~...,~-.~----
_---..._,..,_..._ _u.~._
fOR STAFF USE ONLY
FLN Number (I"rimary) :3 OJ ~ 9 GO' 0 Lf- (;) 0 D 3._~
Follo Number __ ~_'3 '39 'l -S z. '? 9-9.:1. 3, c~ 8"ll G-~ 0 0 I c S
FOliO Number -;;;,q<6:iJ:C-J C-O I 0_11::..___ 3'189lc.~q.. 0000
Folio Numb"r ~9'69\ 5Coooo9 ~'?J"6c'F11 2...000-1
3P\<691~DDOO'8: 3,q'i$'''1q \Goao q
Approved by' .,0.. ,,\. ~<g
YY\..cs;(o. ,."v\
___ Date:
1'2--2-1-09
Updated by:
Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTI-lS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Packet Page -1895-
'DeselemKay
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
DeselemKay
Monday, January 11, 2010 1:01 PM
Robert L Duane
DeltoroZamira
FW: Revised information for the Pre-app for this Wednesday (PL2009-2496)
FYI. You may want to contact Zamira directly if you have any utility concerns.
Kay Dese/em, AICP
cO "incipa/ Planner
r-:.~ning & Land Development Review Department
......
E 7mmunity Deve/opment & Environmental Services
2~WO N. Horseshoe Drive
......'ap/es, FL 34104
o7one: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357
N
--
ex:>
N
--
to
From: DeltoroZamira
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:50 PI~
To: DeselemKay
Subject: RE: Revised information for the Pre-app for this Wednesday (PL2009-2496)
Kay;
I am unable to attend to this meeting; I have a meeting which confiict with your meeting. I wili provide comments when
the project submits the application for review.
Thanks,
Zamira
~ M.,MJ
Project ManaBer
Collier County Public Utilities
PJannine and Project Maue.,5emeni Deparlrnent
3301 E Tamiami Trail
BIde. Ii 3,d 1'100'
Nnples,FL3411Z
Phone numher (239) 252-6279
Cell number (239) 877-8338
fax number (239) 252-6456
From: DeseiemKay
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:44 PM
To: CDS-C; jarrell_p; AblerKenneth; longo_r; JohnsonJeremy; DeltoroZamira; PauloMartins; wiley_r; OteroBrandy;
CasalanguidaNick; beard_I; podczerwinskyJohn; BuchheitDavid; AuclairClaudine; GundlachNancy; DarcoChristopher;
ashton_h; weeks_d; AhmadVicky; 'Tobi Charbonneau'; yang_b
Subject: Revised information for the Pre-app for this Wednesday (PL2009-2496)
1
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
<Please note the information on the pre-app invitation was NOT correct, The site is NOT at 777 Mooring Line
ive Naples 34102-that site is in the City; the site is south side of Oil Well Road (eR8S8), y. mile west of
tverglades Blvd, The folio number provided should be correct. This is the site of GMP amendment CP-2007-3
which is scheduled for BCe Transmittal hearing on lan, 19, 2010, The petition will be seeking a rezone from
Estates to a PUD,
Kay Dese/em, AICP
Principal Planner
Zoning & Land Deve/opment Review Department
Community Development & En vironmenta/ Services
2800 N Horseshoe Drive
Nap/es, FL 34104
Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357
-----Original Appointment-----
From: CarreiDaneile On Behalf Of CDS-C
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:16 AM
To: CDS-C; DeselemKay; jarreil-p; AblerKenneth; longo_r; JohnsonJeremy; MossJohndavid; DeltoroZamira; PauloMartins;
wiley-r; OteroBrandy; CasalanguidaNick; beard_I; PodczerwinskyJohn; BuchheitDavid; AuciairClaudine; seaLs;
.GundiachNancy; DarcoChristopher; ashton_hi weeks_d; AhmadVicky; Tobi Charbonneau
lbject: Pre-app PUDZ; Bob Duane; Applicant; Kay Deselem, Planner (PL2009-2496)
..hen: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:30 AM-ll:30 AM (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US.& Canada),
Where: Conference Room C
Request Information
Meeting Type: preapplication
Requested By: Tobi Charbonneau for Bob Duane on 21-Dec-09
Phone: 254 2021 eMail: tobicharbonneau(a)hmena.com
Representing: EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
Foiio: 39896040009 Zoning E-Estates SPDfSIP
SUbject Type: Rezone
Location: 777 Mooring Line Drive Naples 34102
Description: This request is to set up a Pre-Application Meeting on behalf of Bob Duane to rezone Emmanuel Lutheran Church from an Estates
designatlon to a Subdistrict
Under Florida Law, e-mall addresses are public records. If you do not want your e~maii address released in response to a public r&cords request, do not send
electronic mail to t'1is entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
Packet Page -1897-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
OeJl
~ d-
00.....
N-
__~I:......
tO~i:""""
~. ~
g=
..... rJ).
-
~Z
e.J~
.....
......Z
c.. T I-i
Q..'w'
<0.-(
,rJ).
~
...
~
Cl
Z
U~
~w
I :E
rfj(5
~W
I !;;(
_0
:J
-L
U
~
,!
>
41
c:::
-
c:
41
E
C-
O
a;
>
41 -
o ~
-c >
c: 0
c
....
all
Cl
c:
c:
o
N
.....
o
-
c:
41
E
-
-
c
C-
41
o
a
E ::E
IV W
Qj
III
IV
Q
"'
~ ~
M
0-
C'l
I
C'l
I/)
C'l
ci2 0-
w M
Z C'l
Z
<( ~
.... 41
0.. ..a
o E
w ;)
Z Z
C> 41
c:
II) 0
II) oJ:
<( 0..
'"
'"
w
=
o
'0
!o<(
I~
::E
,
W
-0
~
~
.>
~
/1
~
=
Iw
ICO
l~
'Z
10
,%
'Q..
!
I
("\..
~
<:l
~ .'::l-..
00 \
, N
ri \-./).
~ '"
I:E
i=
I'~
~ >/J
iQ.. '\
IW
10 \,
1~ ( ::::.
,z I ..>
!O ~ '
,Vi ""'[-
[io; H ~\ ; ~ I
i: .~jl.6 ~ to .~~, ~
I '.0 aj \, ,"
I ' , I
I ,! I I I
I I J I J~ P-- f\ i~'
v ~ 1 ~ ,~,d
\.. . ( , .:s ~:s <;::.;+--='j
Iw c ~ Ql, ~l~' ~ ~ ~
':E Q' ! ~ tj 0 - ~ ~,
~ I 01 : J~i 3 ~ (Sf
\~: J ~~ 11 :,J ~ ~
i ~ I -~ (~ ~ ~ \;-.;
L-I ~ 4 \ry,V71'" ,,~'"
'"
o
E
'"
>
~
.,.'
o
'"
N
a;
>
~
N
o
"'
;a
x
u
o
"0
m
o
,.:.
~
cO
'"
~
.c
~
c
OJ
.'"
"0
'"
"'
.>
,g;
"'
0-
0-
m
Q,
Ii:
:;1:
LL
HM
HOLE MONTES
ENGINEERS PlANNERS SURVEYORS
LANDSCAPEARCHtTECTS
6/28/2011 Item 17.B,
950 Encore Way' Naples, Florida 34110' Phone: 239.254.2DOC' Fax: 239.254.2099
September 1, 2010
Kay Dese1em, AICP
Principal Planner
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Zoning and Land Development Services
Growth Management Division
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
COLLIER COUNTY PETITION PUDZ-PL2009-2496
POST - NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
HM: 2006096
Dear Kay:
Enclosed herewith, please find the following documents pursuant to the "Post" NIM
requirements and your request:
. One (1) (original) copy of the Affidavit of Publication dated August 20,2010;
. One (1) copy of the NIM Meeting Minutes prepared by Robert L. Duane, AICP;
. One (1) copy of the Guest Sign-In Log Sheet; and
. One (1) copy of the CD containing the Neighborhood Information Meeting.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
HOLE MONTES, INC.
../1/1i dd'ddMk/{/ud'GI
Tobi D. Charbonneau
Permitting Coordinator
TDC
Enclosures
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\NIMIKD 100901 POST NIM SUPPORT DOCUMENTA TJON.doc
Packet Page -1899-
NAPLES DAILY NEWS
Published Daily
Naples, FL 34110
a:l
r--
......
Affidavit of Pub]'
State of Florida I
Counties of Collier and J
Before the undersigned they serve
appeared Tracv Reeve, who on 0
as the Senior Accountant of the N
a daily newspaper published at 11
Florida; distributed in Collier and 1 '
that the attached copy of the adv~.
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
~
00
N
--
to
Pu13LiC NOnCE
in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE
,
I
i
I
Affiant further sa)'S that the said Naples 0:
published at Naples, in said Collier County,:
newspaper has heretofore been continuousl~
County, Florida; distributed in Collier and rJ
each day and has been entered as second c
office" in Naples, in said CoIlier County, F1
year next pr~eding the fi."'St publication
ad\'e\'tisement; and affiant further says tha
promised any person, firm or cOrPoratio
conunission or reftmd for the purpose of see
publication in the said newspaper.
()
\
)
was published in said newspaper
on August 20, 201 0
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This 24th day of August, 2010
(Sign.;;.~Je ~~,~",';t&~Jic &,,<".
I ""'::;''''~::''' KAROL E KA
~ '""'1''''- '":Xc ~
t""~. ~~,:,,\),..,\ NolalY PuLlic - Sla
~. ._~J ._
: ~,o~. .m_~ll ~"'<C~ My Comm, Expires
-:.;;>~~~~~ '-,. D
f,/;", ".L,c" CumlTll:>"tOn #
., """.", ...
~'{~~~
NEIQHQORHOOQ .... ......
NFORMATION MEETING.
. ,
';".~:'
The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting held by the Em"
manuel Evangelical Lutheran Church, represented by Robert L. Duane, A1CP, of Hole
Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester,
P.Aon~-" ;.". .._r,"-",,",,'..'" '-\'V;'.
,
Wednesday, I\ugust 25, 201 () at 5:30 P,M,
Collier County UF/IFA.S Extension Office,"
14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120
c~:,,~)~!~ ,,:': ' _ ...... '.
Subject Property: Consists of approximateli 21,72 acres.locat'i!d o~.lh~.south side,
of Oil Well Road approximately 11< mile west of Everglades Boulevard, Coll1er County,
Florida. "
DATE & TIME:
LOCATION:
The property owner(s) are requesting;' Rezone from the Estates Zoning District to a
Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUDj to allow fOr th~ Emmanuel
Lutheran Church and related facilitie"- including child care, medical outreach to the
community and schools; The maximum total fl()orarea-allowed in tl}ifi rezoh~ is 90,000
square feet. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet .zoned height, except
the Worship Center shall be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet; Development in this
CFPUD shall be designed to be compatible with the existing and allowed future de-
vebpment in the- surrounding a~ea. The application alsO'nclu?e:_spla:ns;t6reloca~e.~
median opening currently planned adjacent to the westerr'l edge of the prqpertyto an
entrance on Oil Well Road further to the east. . ' .. i_>":"" '
~
~
,':,..1
,
~ M'.... 2.......ES
~
ttJ
i
..-CA.l.....N ....,'-_
""""'-f.'::"-"" Mt~~
o
,
=F-
~
~
~
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
Business and property owners, residents and visitors are w~lcometo~ttend the pre-
sentation and discuss the project with the owner/developer and Collier County staff.
If you are unable to attend thiS meeting, but have questions orcomments', they can be
~irected by mail,phone, fax or e-mail to:
i Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner
Collier County Department of Land Development Services
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Phone: 239-252-2931 Fax: 239-252-6357
kaydeselem@colllergov.net
!i~2L'::;R
AU(]lJst 20 2010
6/28/2011 Item 17.B,
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH CFPUD
PETITION PUDZ-PL2009-2496
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2010
The NIM meeting was held on Weduesday, August 25, 2010 and commenced at 5:40 P.M., at the
Collier County UF/IFAS Extension Office, located at 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida,
Three (3) people from the public signed in as well as the Applicant's team (Robert Duane & Terry
Cole, Hole Montes; Rich Yovanovich, Esq.; Tom Gemmer and Steve Wigdahl, Emmanuel Lutheran
Church; and Ted Treesh, TR Transportation). County staff in attendance was Kay Dese1em.
Bob Duane made the presentation and discussed the proposed request for the CFPUD Rezoning,
and went over the recently approved GMP Amendment and discussed the Permitted Uses and
Master Plan.
Residents were also advised that a median opening is planned to access the property from Oil Well
Road that is proposed to be relocated to a location previously planned just to the west of the subject
property to a location depicted on the Master Plan.
Residents seemed interested to learn of the proposed facilities but had a few questions, as follows:
1. A resident asked when the facility will be built, and Bob Duane advised them it would be
done in phases but construction could commcnce in three years;
2. Another resident asked if any Commercial Uses were planned on the north side of Oil Well
Road across the street from the proposed Church, and Bob Duane indicated that this was not
the case;
3. The same resident asked how far the entrance to the Church was from Everglades
Boulevard. Bob Duane advised that it was ",2000 feet away.
The meeting adjourned shortly before 6 PM and the residents were advised there would be Public
Hearings later this fall and they would be notified.
R\2(XI6\2or150\l6\WP\.REZONE (rUD) 2009\NIM\N1M MEETrNG MrNUTES ()R.2S-1a.doc~
Packet Page -1901-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
00
N
--
to
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERANCHURCH
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMA TION MEETING
AUGUST25,20IO 5:3of.....
NAME
ADDRESS
TEL. NO
CiA P€REZ-/vJ'f),Jt~ ~;f7S 8/-:.p.4ve. /tiE .? .., ) fb:::> b,:2~9 7'-~-:5 ~/bi'
--r;',..., 6. WV\ Mlf 771 f"1,,",,~,~ l-..\L :tf ~ yltl.... d-d ~ - ;J..f, 1- 'i Ii ).-
$,t~ vJ;,H1.,,\.J 7" (Y10H.."I L'YlL t,/ ~ 'tlo 'y ~1- ).b( -!;)~qt./
/tJ a.c.!. If) JVt./tC 4 d, ~~~-.E'~hde..I d/.. d ;1/ ' ,2y f-;$!"r,L - tJ S H-
t..s.E. }.If c('A5k~ I ;}J)P ).A' IR.It D4 L.. ,., J Y IIJ]. .:i.G,;,. - jlJt~
/
.
H:\2006\2006096\WP\REZONE (PUD) 2009\NIM\NIM SIGN-IN SHEET l00825.doc
HM
HOLE MONTES
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
LA~CSCAPE ARCHITECTS
950 Encore Way' Naples, Florida 34110' Phone: 239.254.2000' Fax: 239254.2099
August 10, 2010
Kay Deselem, AICP
Principal Planner
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Zoning and Land Development Review
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
PETITION PUDZ-PL2009-2496
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
SUPPORT DOCUMENT A TION
HM: 2006096
Dear Kay:
Enclosed herewith, please find the following documents pursuant to the County's NIM
requirements and your request:
. One (I) (original) executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Robert L. Duane);
. One (I) copy of the Property Owner's list; and
. One (I) copy of the Neighborhood Information Meeting notification letter sent to all
Property Owners today, Tuesday, August 10, 2010, fifteen (15) days prior to NIM
Meeting.
Once the NIM has taken place, we will provide you with a copy of the recorded meeting and
minutes.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
HOLE MONTES, INC.
~/ftt~
Tobi D. Charbonneau
Permitting Coordinator
TDC
Enclosures
H:\2006\2006096\Wp\RElONE (PUD) 2009\N1M\KD ]00810 NIM SUPPORT DOCL'MENTA nON.coc
Packet Page -1903-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
00
N
--
to
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development
Code, I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and or condominium and civic
associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an
application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to
the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the
names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls
of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the
county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of
proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting.
Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part oftllis
Affidavit of Compliance.
;:;~ ~.
(Siguature 01 Agent) Robert L. Duane, AlCP, Plarming Director
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this lotb
August, 2010 by Robert L. Duane, who is personally known to me or who has
day of
produced
as identification.
~dtdI1:U ~ ~/UI
(Siguature of Notary Public)
(Notary Seal)
Paulette Debus Charbonneau
Printed Nanle of Notary
....,.....'" PA\JLETlE DEBUS CHARIlONNEAU
!,!''''i:J.~:.. MY COMMISSION' DD 812639
~~,.j EXPIRES: [)e<:ember 7. 2012
,r..i&."f;;~"',l Bonded Thro NoWyPubficUnde1writltl
H:\2006'2006096\'\NP\!l.EZONE (PV!))2009\NIM'Affid~v;t ofComplil\llce- NIMjar.1010 IOJl!.lO.doc
HM
HOLE MONTES
ENGINEERS PlANNERS SURVEYORS
IANDSCAPEilRCHITECTS
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
950 Encore Way' Naples. Florida 34110, Phone: 239.254.2000' Fax: 239.254.2099
August 10, 2010
RE: EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
PETITION PUDZ-PL2009-2496
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2010 @5:30 P.M.
HM PROJECT NO.: 2006096
Dear Property Owner:
Please be advised that the sender has submitted a formal application to Collier county asking the
County to approve an application requesting to rezone 21.72 acres from the Estates Zoning District to
a Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to allow for the Emmanuel Lutheran
Church and related facilities including child care, medical outreach to the community and schools, on
the property, which is located on the south side of Oil Well Road approximately Y. mile west of
Everglades Boulevard, in Section 19, Township 48, Range 28, Collier County, Florida. The
maximum total floor area allowed in this rezone is 90,000 square feet. The maximum height of
buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the Worship Center shall be permitted a zoned height
of 35 feet. Development in this CFPUD shall be designed to be compatible with the existing and
allowed future development in the surrounding area. The application also includes plans to relocate a
median opening currently planned adjacent to the western edge of the property to an entrance on Oil
Well Road further to the east.
In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting
will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention to the described
property as indicated above, and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development, we
are holding a Neighborhood Information Meeting on Wednesday, August 25,2010 at 5:30 P.M"
at the Collier County UFIIFAS Extension Office, located at 14700 Immokalee Road, Naples,
Florida.
At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed
and to answer any questions.
Should you have any questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
HOLE MONTES INC.
(Representing Emmauuel Evangelical Lutheran Church)
flr-l.e4^ f)?~~.
Robert L. Duane, AICP
Planning Director
Enclosure: Vicinity Map
H,\2006\2006096\WPIREZONE (PUP) Z009\NIM\NIM PROPERTY OWNER LETTER (EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH) 100810 .doo
Packet Page -1905-
a:l
r--
......
E
QJ
~
......
......
o
N
--
00
N
--
to
A
\CI
o
,
1 MILE
SCALE IN MILES
SCALE: 1" = 1 MILE
rT
i
--
~ '--
I
IMMOv
J1,
r.
I
~~ I
. .,.--
"'.....,
.+....
tM
lIEIISfUII&SSIlIEl'IIIS
i .....
I 7-0;:1_
I
-/':'-- ._-
2 MILES
,
"
,......"
Cork crew
Middle School
L.:
.
~I
z
0
HI)
!.-J
I~,!
I. I
,
2r....47-e7 :
~ 47""
\..
-,...
I
..----..
M-17-1!7
:&-041-21 :K-4N?
0
cl: I
0 :J1....-,-es ;
ex:: [
[1j------- I
I'. ...- - ; ".n
.-J
~ I ........
0 , 01-4&-27
:2 ......." I
:2
........,
.-
-
..._ "uu.
,
..-10>
....'"
, I
,,_eo
......... Orangetree-rp~I;;;~lt~Rldg~:.
~~~\ i Hi?h School
-/ -r~~ .....""
,
~@ ANGETREE
, I~~ .U.D. ......."
lP'A ~...,
-),)(/\11
,,......,
,et.....,...
1II!...7-e1
,,........
"".....
" -
i
,U ROAD
19-48-28 \.
..
.
.
.
.
. ......" .
;
I... ................ '
I
\ "..,.."
i
, ,
,
,.
,
,
I
,
I
,
Z':I~ 'lD-48-l!lI
36-4~V 3t-4lI-ta
I
,i
f-
I .
..
.-;;
-
-
--;:
1--'
\
l
T ..
'-
,
~
. .
.
"
;
i-
u::,..! -
~~J:..-
, =stT~'-
1-
II '
--'
I,
-
-
. .
-
-
-
I---
950 Enco.. Way
]1... FI.. 34110
PhOllOl 239) 254-2000
.10 a Cer1llloat. of
Aulhorf%allon No.l772
VICINITY MAP
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
['n
iI~
."
..+U}- -..
ILl.I
" Cl
,""
.-J _.....
.........
ex::
"
... ..
T
1
,
.
r WJ. dn-dod p.loqaJ al JaI9^~J
! ap uye a1mpell e( fl zauda}:!
A~3^"f-09<008- ~
WOJ"hJG^e"MMM
AGUIRRE, CARLOS=& YUSLEJDY
2980 31ST AVE NE
o"......,LES, FL 34120-4505
BARNES, ALLEN W
6129 QUINN ORCHARD RD
FREDERICK, MD 21704--6625
BRAVO, FERNANDO=& DIGNA
1855 W 62ND ST APT 218
HIALEAH, FL 33012-8003
BROCK, DEV1N=& PAULA
644 94TH AVE N
NAPLES, FL 34108-2447
CARRILLO, CONSTAIN
8104 SW 136TH PL
MIAMI. FL 33183-4187
CASTANEDA, MARIO
2730 Oil WELL RD
NAPLES, FL 34120-4453
CATALANO, CHERY
KRISTIE SERRANO
34 LE MANS OR
NAPLES, FL 34112-9126
CIVIL, EDY=& NOELLlNE
2640 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES. FL 34120-2921
COLLI ER CNTY
3301 TAMIAMl TRL E
NAPLES, FL 34112-4961
COLLIER CNTY
3301 TAMIAMI ~ E
NAPLE, 34112-4961
CUNNINGHAM, EZ!::KJEL=& BEVERLEY
2760 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4542
DAVIS, EUGENE E=& DONNA M
22813 PLEASANT AVE
EASTPOINTE, MI 48021-1790
DECARDENAS EST, MATEO F
% NOAA C DECARDENAS PR
1084 FOREST LAKES DR APT 203
NAPLES, Fl 34105-2207
DEGASPARI, IRMA
2670 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-1485
DETRICK TR, WARNER=&= LOUISE
DETRICK FML Y TRUST
UTO 7/17/07
901 9 SE 1 20TH LOOP
SUMMERFIELD, FL 34491-8241
DiAl, ARMANDO
8081 SUNRISE LAKES DR N # 309
SUNRISE, FL 33322-1672
DUNCAN, ROBERT
JANA IRWIN
2595 31 ST AVE NE
NAPL!;;.S, FL 34120-0000
DUPREE, R TERRY
3415 E\lERGLADES BLVD N
NAPLES, FL 34120-1547
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUT
CHURCH OF NAPLES
777 MOORIN DR
NAPL , L 34"102-4715
:=:RAN
1 @09~5 @A~3J\" ~
l-uaWa6Jelp
ap sues
...
r ""-~~~, Packet Page -1907- Jad';raaJ
r
I
,
.
^^'" IU"lA""'''''t~I''I""F: "". .,.",,~.,.,,_
6/28/2011 Item 17.B,
_' BERNHARDT. LEO W;;;& MARY K
2685 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-2922
CARLYLE, PATRICIA K
4375 MEADOWLAND CIR
SARASOTA, FL 34233-1303
CAST1NElRA, BRAULlO
2830 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-0000
COLLI ER CNTY
3301 TAMIAMI E
CUEVAS, LILLIAN
274031 ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4542
DAY TR, PATRICK B
DAY TRUST
UTD 09/19/85
9209 D1AMONDHEAD DR
DEXTER, IA 50070-7503
DELGADO, ROXANA
CARLOS E VALCARCEl
2990 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-1582
DORTA, SECUNDINO=& MARIA C
19223 NW 46TH AVE
OPA LOCKA, FL 33055-----2109
DUPREE, RUBERT TERRY
3415 EVERGLADES BLVD N
NAPLES, FL 34~20-1547
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
CHURCH OF NAPLES INC
777 MOORJNG LINE DR
NAPLES, Fl 34102-4715
f
,
,
,
@09~5 a;eldwalllj)~a^'\f asn
sl"q", 1Ij)1""d Ase3
l'
,
I
,
r WI dn-dod p.loqa.l 61 J61iJ'^ijJJ
! ap uy.e ;:umpel.l el ~ Z8!1dal:i
lUawa6Jelp
ap 5USS
..,
A1I3A\f-09-00B-1
Wo,',{J&AeOMMM
EMMANUELEVANGELlCAL~RAN
CHURCH OF NAPLEs:.fflC
777 MOORING.-l-1NE OR
N~~~ 34102-4715
EMMANUEL EVANGELIC
CHURCH OF NAPL C
777 MOORIN E DR
NAPL 34102-4715
EMMANUELEVANG LUTHERAN
CHURCH OF N ES INC
7n MOO G LINE DR
NABk ,FL 34102-4715
EMrvlANUEL EVANGELIC
CHURCH OF NA2 INC
777 MO LINE DR
EG, FL 34102-4715
-":mas TR, TH!::.LM.A M
cri :..TED 06/28/90
. '805 N BOSWELL BLVO
~JNCITY. J:>Z 85373-1624
ESCALONA, DN>JIEL
330 TAM1AIJlI CANAL RD
MIAMI, FL 33144-2545
E
QJ
==
-r- ..EMING, LANCE J=& TAMMI S
~ 140 Oil WELL RD
o '\PLES, FL 34120-1459
N
--
00
N
--
to
GARCIA, AU F:o.& ALICIA M
2795 31ST AVE f,JE
NAPLES, FL 34120-44n
GENER, NORMA
2870 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4476
GODDARD, JOHN
4670 43RD AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34iZO-1540
GOEDEKE, MARGARITA
2785 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, Fl 34120--4477
GO::DEKE, rvlARGARITA MADERA
KIMBERLEE HERNANDEZ
L1lUAN CUEVAS
2785 31$T AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4477
GRANADO. JENNIFER
2980 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-1582
G'JZMElI,BAKSARA
2618 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES. FL 34120-1405
HINES, GARFIELD
EDEU HINES
4665 8TH 5T NE
NAPLES, Fl 34120-2904
HlJTCH1NSON ET ALS, LARRY W
1331 AUGUSTINE DR
THE VILLAGES, FL 32159-8536
JC ORA.INFIELD INC
768 COMMERC1AL BLVD
NAPLES, FL 34104........()OOO
JC DRAINFIELD II'>JC ~
768 COMMERC~
NA7V34104--4797
~
JC DRAINFIELD~
768 CO~.~IAL BLVD
~5, FL 34104--0000
! @091S @^~3^,;/ @
r w.ra6p3 dn-dod asodxa
! o~ auu Duole puaa
_ Jaded paa~
_ T
r
I
,
,
@091S ~1I3A\f ~IJeqe6"1 Z"5!1!~n
'''I..d ~ '''IPeI5..~..nb!+~
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL L~N
CHURCH OF NAPL~
7n MOORINqJJNE DR
N~1.E&;---F'C 34102-4715
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTH
CHURCH OF NAPLES IN
7n MOORING R
NAPL L 34102-4715
FERRERA,HUMBERTO
273131 5T AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4477
GARCIA, MARIO
5730 W 14TH AVE
HIALEAH, FL 33012-2217
GODDARD, JOHN
4670 43RD AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-1540
GDODLAND GOWEN GATE LLC
15489 SUMMIT PLACE CIR
NAPLES, FL 34119-4123
HAMILTON, MARGIE E
PO BOX 12045
NAPLES. FL 34101-2045
J & E RAMiREZ LLC
RAMIREZ, JUAN=& ELVIA
90 22ND AVE NW
NAPLES, FL 34120-3309
JC DRAtNFIELD INC
768 COMMERCI 0
NA~L 34104-4797
----
JOHNSON, KATHLEEN M
8 P.AYMOND Pl
CROMWELL, CT 06416-1316
r
,
I
,
@091S a.eldw"l ~"^\f "'n
51"Q'" @I....d Ase3
^lf3A\1-09-008'~
WO)'A.ia^e"MMM
r rudn-dOd PJoqilJ 61 J619^iJlJ
! ap uy.e 8Jnlpell el ~ zaudaH
.J.UdW"I.JJ~I.f~
ap suas
T
JOHNSON, WALFI M=& ELMA I
% ELEANOR BOYD
1Q33 VILLA PL
\RD, OH 44420-2084
JUNKER, GREGORY S=& KATHLEEN L
2402 RQCKVVELL AVE
CATONSVILLE, MD 21228-4753
KUNTZ, JOHN E=& MARY A
260 WESTB ROOK DR
TOMS RIVER, NJ 08757-5640
LAURORE, KENOL=& SANDY
2680 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES. FL 34120-2921
LINARES, HECTOR G
3261 2ND AVE SE
NAPLES, Fl 34117-3764
LINK, CHRISTOPHER=& KATHERINE
1777 BIRDIE DR
NAPLES, FL 34120-0541
MAIN, CHERYL LYNN
LARRY G KNAPP
% LARRY G KNAPP
2880 20TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-0000
MARTINEZ JR. CARLOS
21445 TOWN LAKES DR APT 338
BOCA RATON, FL 33486-8825
MENDEZ. DUNIELVYS
GUERAA, PEDRO A=& XIOMARA
2931 6TH AVE N:=
NAPLES, FL 34120-0000
MERCA~O, MARCELO
LILLIAN GUADALUPE
3125 EVERGLADES BLVD N
NAPLES, FL 34120-1700
. ....I PROPERn' INVESTMENTS LLC
8260 SW 182ND ST
PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157-6134
MOHRING, KATHLEEN A
KAREN SARLP.SS
2531 7 MILE RD
SOUTH LYON, MI 48178-9617
OBERLlES, DEBORAH L
2730 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-0441
OJEDA, SERG10=& JOYCE
DE LA NOVAL, DAVID=& YA1ME
16653 SW 1ST 5T
PEMBROKE PINES, FL 33027-1018
ORTEGA, HECTOR F
2720 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, Fl 34120-0441
PALlLLA, AURA YAM1LE
6259 SAXON BLVD
WEST PALM BEACH, Fl 33417-5435
PELAEZ. GONZAlO
5561 SW 8TH CT
MARGA TE, Fl 33068-2930
PEREZ, JUAN MIGUEL
2914 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4505
-PIMENTEL, JOHN=& MARICEL
'00 SW 259TH TER
MESTEAD, FL 33032-7072
pupa, ALICE
2845 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4541
1 @09~S @AH3Nd $
r WJ.o6P3 ..I... ..L... , __...-1.._ Jaded paa::l
! o~au Packet Page -1909- ..,
@109~S ......1l3A\1 weqe5 al zaS!I!~n
6/28/2011 Item 17.B,
KERSTEN, UDO=& ALICE
222 7TH 5T APT 2D
GARDEN Cln', NY 11530-5702
LEWIN TR, RUTH L
RUTH L LEWIN TRUST
UTO 8/22103
460 E OCEAN AVE APT 501
LANTANA, FL 33462-3356
LUCIO, GABRIEL
SANTOS LUCIO
PO BOX 653033
MIAMI, Fl 33265-3033
MARTINEZ, ANTONIO
2835 31ST AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-4541
MESA, MARTHA=& RODOLFO
20555 SW 187TH AVE
MIAMI, FL 33187-3203
NOEL, JOS::;:PH
ROSE JEAN
3445 EVERGLADES BLVD N
NAPLES, FL 34120-1547
O!..IVOS TR, ALFONSO
INES OLlVOS TR
ALFONSO oLivas REV TRUST
INES OLlVOS REVTRUST5548 FOXHUNTWAY
NAPLES. FL 34104--4903
PATTERSON, RONEY L=& SHARON A
5050 PALMETTO WOODS DR
NADLES, Fl 34119-2814
PEREZ, RAFAEL
17220 SW 146TH CT
MIAMI, FL 33177-6622
PURON,MAYTE
2660 Oil WELL RD
NAPLES, Fl 34120-4529
f
,
,
I
@09 ~S a~eldw.l @AJ"^\1 asn
slaq", @Iaad Ase3
^1l3^V-09-o08-~
WO)",(Ja^e"MMM
r .....Ldn~dod -pJoqaJ al Jafii~A~J
! ap uy.e aJntpell 121 'i Z9!1daH
luawaOJe4'
ap sues
...
RAMOS, AR.IEL
2748 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-0000
RAMSINGH. bJQRMAN R
6119 FUNSTON ST
HO:"'LY\t\IOOD, FL 33023-1826
RODRIGUEZ. JOSE
MARIA F DIAZ
13856 SW 155TH TER
MIAMI. FL 33177-1158
SAN LAZARO INVEST" .-..4
3506 E 23RD $T ~:::. LLl..
~--1312
SANCHEZ, SilVIA
. I LAUREL OAK DR
CI:! :...LDOSTA, GA 31602-7460
r--
......
SANTOS, CHRISTOPHER A
2670 OIL WELL RD
NAPLES, FL 34120-4529
E
QJ
~
- JSA, PEDRO A=& ISABEL M
't'"'"".0 W 43RD $T
a ALEAH, FL 33012-7252
N
--
00
N
--
to
...,JMRELL. MATTHEW B
102 WOO::;lRUFF CT
GARY, NC 27518-6835
SOTO JR., RUPERTO
A:JELAIDA SOTO
2830 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-0489
SUTHERLAND. ROB:::RT N=& EMMA P
500 VIi MADISON PL
IND1ANOLA, IA 50~25-3709
TOUSSAlNT, ANOUCE
LEONNE TOUSSAINT
GARLENE LOUIDOR
2940 35TH {WE N:::
NAPLES, FL 34120-1582
UNITED COMMUN:TY BANK TR
NO 405-023 TRUST
UTO 2005
1900 WILES A\/E
SPRINGFIElJ, IL 62704--4 i76
VARGAS, ANDRE\I\I
1948 FREDERICK 8T
NAPLES, FL 34112-0618
V\rALSH, BONNIE=& T::::RRY
24 aD OIL W=.ll RD
NAPLES. Fl 34120-1471
WALSH, TERR\'",& BONNIE
2400 OIL V...'ELL KD
NAPLES, FL 34~20-1471
WAUHOP, CINDY
2970 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, rl 34120-1582
WINDHAUSER, JOSEPH W
VIRGINIA I WINDHAUSSR
7047 E SHOOTING STAR WAY
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85266:"'-7026
! @09~S @A~3A" ~
r rua5P3 dn-dOd asodxa
! o~ au!! 6uoJe puaa
_ Jaded paa:l
- ...
r
,
I
.
@09~S ~1l3^V HJeqe6 BI ZBS!I!~n
JBIBd ~ sBlpel SBl+Bnb!~~
RODRIGUEZ, ALEIDA
549 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W
NAPLES, FL 34120-2170
SAN LAZARO INVESTIvlENTS LLC
3506 E 23RD ST
ALVA, FL 33920-1312
SANTOVENIA, ANIBAl"'& IOARM1S
2690 35TH AVE NE
NAPLES, FL 34120-1405
SPIERT, GARY A;;;.& MICHELLE E
2626 OIL WELL RD
NAPLES, FL 34120-4529
THOMPSON, ROBIN LEA
3295 LAKESIDE RD # 1
MILLERSPORT, OH 43045-9789
US BANK NATL ASSOCIATION TR
% AMERICAS SERVICING C8MPANY
3476 STATEVIEW BLVD
FOR MilL, SC 28715-0000
WALSH, TERRY
BONNIE L JOLLY WALSH
2400 Oil WELL RD
NAPLES, Fl 34120-1471
WilLIAMS, MICHAEL C
3291 NW 42ND ST
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309--4224
"
I
,
,
@09~S ;qeldwa.L@FuBAV asn
SIBq"l @IBBd Ase3
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
AG!:.NUA II tlVl ~-D
-
--,;';_.
!("~,~,,~
CoHfer County
~~~'~i~tr.'~,,,,,,\~,_,,,,,",,>>,
STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING & REGULATION
HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2011
SUBJECT:
PUDZ-PL2009-2496: EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN
CHURCH OF NAPLES
PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT/AGENT:
O\Nller/ Applicant:
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc.
c/o Tom Gemmer
777 Mooring Line Drive
Naples, FL 34102
A~ents:
Robert L. Duane, AICP
HoleMontes
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 341 ] 0
Richard D. YovanO\~ch, Esquire
Coleman, Yovano\~ch and Koester, P.A,
4001 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
REOUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an
application for a rezone from the Estates (E) zoning district to the Community Facilities Planned
Unit Development (CFPUD) zoning district for a project to he known as Emmanuel Evangelical
Lutheran Church Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 21.72t-acre property is located on the south side of Oil Well Road approximately
1/4 mile west of Everglades Boulevard. in Section 19, Township 48 South, Range 28 East.
Collier County, Florida. (See location map and proposed PUD Master Plan on the following
pages. )
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ.PL2009.2496
April 21,2011 cepc
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 1 of 16
Packet Page -1911-
6/28/2011 Item 17.B.
--
I
!
, !.
,~'-,- ~ _un~lL~
'I '
~I;-
I
r--;-
~ 1 J il~ l 1~ltJl I ilLU IL
' ~. ....~~-:~n-!-=-_ -'- - ~J -~~~L=t :"~,~",~;L:~: I ' I' ~- -~~-
. . '.r~~.Ud"r-~I. 1-1.. I.
__:: ""___~___b__;l; :,; \1 ~ ~ ~:,
~ I ~ ~J,~ ~ ; ~!~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~
--~... .. ---j I, ---- ---.
" ' "'I i . ,.
L-.. ----- -- ......- : i ..--
. : l:_:~,J ~_J-=Jt~.- -1-
~__~.~____j _n___~L'__'~~:~__m_;1 ,--' ~~-.~ "..--..
, I . , ' I ' ':1 ' I . I . " ,
-- i- -I'-i----i- --1, - --r
,
,
\ ~
'. /~-;+._..
I / ~Q!I
'/ ~ ~ 'I
1/ 0 C) ,
'-/rJ- . -.1 ,\g: 3 J I,...
I I~
loj
. '''I' ...."
'" ',"
U ,II
(,,' t:'";
I
/
( i
I ".
r ~s
L_
I ..
I .
r-,-
1"---
z-
o
.
''7 ~
~-..,\.._..-
','<.:
r-~. ". ,,' ,:c
Yl -r~\~- ~ ~
.,.~,i~!~~.?
"'-.-
,
1'<-"')
."
,,:."
C,.,
, ~
Packet Page -1912-
"
c-'
CL
4:
~
C)
Z
Z
o
N
'"
~
..
'"
~
o
o
'"
-'
0.
N
o
::>
0.
..
Z
o
f-
f-
UJ
0.
CL
4:
~
z
o
f-
4:
()
o
....J
,
,
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
~!I: "II ----
I,! III
111111 H
II,ili,\~
1'1 1,1
'\i'ill III
~\Hj\lii\ '=.""::;;'~'
{I.~ \111 1\ il 0
Iii; i~ :\1 '1:'- ~- :! """' ';;"'::"::';'~:;'::'M "
~\\W I,i ! :~I~ :F-----~---;;;;.......""------==:::-- -- ~--l
~ 11',\') 111 .~ C? G 0 n 0 ,)"-\Il II
~\ tj'I,1Ili i il:~~b /-I~ I~I [1 rL n 1'- 'r I r-!l
'rIll 1\111: .1! ". I 'D ,.Jll I
1'.',11,1,.= 'jl
1 :,i~' 'iil: I: ~ili . .:] ~~ I I
i::\1.111!I'i I: 1J1 , Hi ~H~ ~ I ,: 'i I
h1.'II' I' '= ]IIU;' I
11 \,I~~lli!li .1. .,Ii,':'l.r' 1- I' ----.- "'I. I mi i ti
.'1,'0'11' . IlL ;!i:I"
'l'I,~I, I'll .,,::, ,'- ' "i' .~~~
I r!lr~ II', n'l" ~= I I - J I f I-I. 'l i :~
\ \lilt 1,!lr j: I'r' I_I [~~ I ili I I ~~
" \11\II~il ~1q i I ! " 1'. I : ~ "
I~ .~",j i! I: i:l!i\ c=) _ill -- j,l~ I......:' _,! IF' (lh I
I ,'\ ~t111 'I: i [1 - -- H :31-:_-"~'
II 1 U\l IIIii'I I,! Ii 1_ ..J I: ~_~L, ~ ", ~, if
11 I~ril: 1[;' '~I'~I \3 '=J~ U LJ U l_ I L./ ,,~) J;
I, 11 ~ ~/1 i\i( :! I ...----\ /---,------------;;;;t;;.,.~.._..;;_----_=_~___~_~_~~~
Ii I,Ufl illl II! I:! I ~-- --m~=~!T-~ --- - -~~~~
Ii I~J ijl ::l11) I II ) n,j Ii
II: .J l,iIIl:'.:.:_J~::::'':-{
~ ("1'\ ~~I' I I :lh~",,-/'-J-,,__~/-;-,-,j "'JY1~."~PU.,.~..>d.<J.rIM.:;t
!~..I.:I 1l,l'liil ~ .I:~ :(,~r'tl
..' I] ) ii,'_~~~~m.:; ,
III 'I' 'j'lt I 4;~~\ ~c-=t;=ic~~~~ 1
. I ' ",... m --cr'- ..,~,. ,
Ii . 'I :11H-----"-:--.--,,~+- ~
'I' I! I :I_."~__~.~-,-~' :"
~, i.. _ (.-_~ __';i.L..........- - fD
I \ Ii c+ ---tj' I " '
\,' I' j[~~~?JJ!
"~ '"JjPti. ,'.""pu" .H. .0', .~"". .';l ,
~
j
~
,
1i
,
!
r
o
r-
,
~~--_._-_._-----------.-/
''''....^ """ ^"WOj .,Hu~" .'rl pUl'll
.,.,...l:..P....ol
:."E-.Ji:-6'i:O;~-ii~""~"
.J"d IleM J~l"'WU~d ON
~. r 'UN U"ll~'MO
8
~
~. ,
., J ~ .
I .2 ~
. , , , , ,
0 , , " , E
, " . , . ,
< " -~,~ 1 1 1 1
~. " ~
i . 0 >< - " - -
- . . .. " ~
" , " 0
j~ Z "
.. .~~ t~ , .
. "- '0 I~ ,; i
a ^ . 0 " " "
1i:'g ~ ~
t < u.L) ~ , , ,
!; 0.' , " N " <
~ . < f::
~c
Pl
r..:
~!"#.1fif..l'1f;f'J'''''
cl '" ~... 0 '" '""":
;I~~~~~~::~
OJ ... _..
"
;~!~~~S~~~~
E~
~
,...
~" - ~ ~
Blr ~~~
:g:j ~;; <> f~ ~ :, 6 ~
~: l~ljj~]Ij ~
i;::
:;0;;
~;
~;
~!
^'''''''H) "a."_\'_,:)'1__
-,"."'.....1 ^""'""o~ ."~i'd
n
~!
,jl"*""
13--
f
:--nToTo~;;"o"'><;1
';JCII"M ,.,.,)u..IJa" "".
I 1 .O!:J "'?!....~'!
.
.
Packet Page -1913-
~ :;; II \<;
! ~ i -
,
o .
" rn
~ ~ II :;;
! ~ I ~
ili
'I
hi
ill
Ii
I
z
<
....
C-
,,0:
W
....
....'"
-<
~2
)( .
w'l
"
0:
u:
U
,
,
ii
I
!
.
!
.
1:
.
,,~~O ~
3;~~F
'~,"
'" 't
~i~j
i~.
i
i
,
.!
Ii
!
i
......
<x:
!:::!I
......u
LJ.Jcr:
\D::>
ZI
<X:u
>
LJ.J
Z
......<x:
LJ.Jcr:
::>UJ
ZI
<tl-
23
2
UJ
,
.J_
:lli
:1:[:
i~:i
" I
~I '
,
, I ~I
, "
, ,
, ,
i<!:~
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Approval of this project will allow development of a maximum of 90,000 square feet of uses that
would include worship/church and related social services uses, including a 300-person child and
adult day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation services. a 450-student private
school, or in the alternative. development of a maximum of 10 single-family residential dwelling
units in compliance with the density and development standards of the Estates zoning district of
the Land Development Code (LDC) and any other Growth Managcmcnt Plan (GMP) limitations,
As depicted on the PUD Master Plan on the following page, primary access to the property
would be from Oil Well Road, an ea,t-west roadway that would form the northern boundary of
the propcrty, A possible interconnection is shown to the private roadway on the western property
boundary.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Oil Well Road, then a row of 2-2.5 acre tracts, one of which is developed with a single-
family home with a zoning designation of Estates
South: single-family home sites ranging in size from 1.14 to 2.73 acres, fronting on 31 " Avenue
NE, with a zoning designation of Estates
East: undeveloped (but cleared) 1.82 and 5 acre tracts both with a zoning designation of Estates
West: two 2.5 acre tracts, onc of which is developed with a single family home (the other is
undeveloped) and then Lime Rock Road, a private road then a single-family home on a 1.7," acre
tract, all with a zoning designation of Estates
,. ,....~ ~. ~i . ",) r 'oj" ~ 1
..: . ~ ~/l",hj ...~ ~.
".. .. ~f ~I#~:~+''''...I,),.
it:" I!? i~ 1 .,.",. ..1 WI. l~t.S 1;-
~ ,':Ui~,;",:' V.."i-~ ...." ~l' I r'I'-"f'
'" I' > · ." . I.. '1 ~ ~
I : 1'.~ .:~.:tI:.~ 1 " .l.,d[ , ~
i' . , ...." If,
. iJ" ~1I1 f ~ f:j\ ~'l ;/!"~;:~';"'l \I'~ ~
"."tJ ,If' ~,"--l~~.! I' t l,li.,: l
'~- 4"'" J: 'j -..,:;;J' b: \"" ~ l~
'! ,~,::':; 1 _. .~:~', ';'::'tr:~:~:"'~_):.'1~'.,. ~ ,,';' ,$f~~f";JI.'i:~ (;,,"" ;
"'1"'" ~".v,..~.. .. hd.. ..,..."
'h.' :t->', - -', II -,!iJ':.;iI,'-~ j',~,.,- -;1(,;"""",,:' "'I':;,'::
'. .....;:.:L.
'. .. . .):t""".,
L..,<t~' .... .... ~..,..,~.....,..~;..:._"...::....*.MtIf;~.
.~...~. .'.~;::V~~~i...~- .,.~-~..>1t....~l!lIl."'!".:..~ :,...:.r..",::':.';.,.~,." .'l.".;'IlW ~. ",l"'~ ..: . '~'"FI' ,.
'.i1 ~ i''J; '>~'.~"I'~ ;"",~':~:t,~,~,: ,,{:';'~,::j';'21 0::>.._. ' :,) _!~,~,~;'.' 1'..~~", "~('.';,
'..'," ", ",1l ,~_...... ,............_.,'.....,. ",_._~____~ . L.:':-;.....L '.,,~'
;\0_ .., l'''',''~l,~'' ,j--, ""'"",~"_;"",,;,,,""r-''-'c,'' "'''.' .' ,-" . "'.:'i
, t'lr;i!' R.I' j.. :.' .. '. '.',.,.. ,C...C' "':U"LJ, I' ~.,.,
. ".~filf"'~ .t~.\..:... fIt::" .,.;' . ..'_".." .c....:...I'..;., .. 1"
". ~ .~ "...'. '. '. .v. .... ....,.. '".'- I. . 1....-..
.'.'~d ;,"11 ',(2: ";'J.~, '. ; ",,"':, ',','.'., I ,!i',':! ..,..
.,," "'1 ,,<J!,~.!' <<" i .. . .;.... ,.'\.' ..... I i '.'j'.
'F, i ':",f' ,.: :,,',; ',,';" ',,,',",,<,," -'~,~ ""',,_~,,, :,1",', ~':,
!t.-,. It. .~:.' ...... .......,....";1.......:...'... L"'1
II ~f . ~ ~"i1~'" ,,'~:, ~:,,~~.:~:'~~"::;, ..l}.:.~~.:1-;...~.~~;:~;' I,;" 1."
. $.. T"ir:.i!1> 1 ..J . . ....1 -..".1 I ,:
~,:.: >r. ~~: ~.: ,_,._': ,:".~.,<<_,_:,~.,' ~~.;...~_:~:-',E~-'~l.:,.i~~~
c,,, '''~.. ,. .~~. .. 'I .. 'I" i ',~
P::' .E,', ',_, '-, ,;',,-1<:>' 'l.,""~,~';,,"',,:d_;k"',, '1-<',' ,~"j>;;:';
,7 ,...,,11, rJ5'.!iffl 1--""'""""'.1"1.' ''/I~~I.i \1 ;.1, I.~'
. ." i:"~':\. l-"~'II!o.I1t~,..d~".-,!",""f.~,.,.~+ j'I' ;,,_',~'I. . 'r"""l":~.
~ ,... ::~~~:';-i:".~ ;'<<,i :JI':;:$'~...!~;i.. t "l!,.l^~:-'.'; ..;:<kJ,'~. i 1::1
. -.: . '. ,,",1,.'\.0 "._--:t..",,':.....:l;...:..""'" ,,,...j..~..,~.t. "!,, "-'~'-~'",.-.,.l.., ". I .-: "i!..
" I.'"~ ,~ ,~j.,'u:;"I,';>,:..~.,!,'.':J.",ii .:. ~".i <,' . i:'l:;
~~. . ...~>-.'...,c;.~.." j.._..,.~c ,..ii...... .'1 'C,"
;" . ~~, ,'. ',' . .~, j"':"':';~'~'l t- Jt-~:;.<" ,..: :,"i\, . J'.,-::f'," i '1,1!~4
At" . ~ J...., ,-,.':1 :~,t,.~:"'," ;,,_.~. ~.~ _1..'. ,0 6- .".., , >;.
Aerial Photo (subject site depiction is approximate)
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ.PL2009.2496
April 21, 2011 ccpe
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 2 of 16
Packet Page -1914-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Estates (Estates -
Mixed Use District, Mission Subdistrict), as identified on the Golden Gate Area Master Plan
(GGAMP) Future Land Use Map in the Growth Management Plan (GMP), Under this
designation, the site qualifies for limited institutional uses as well as low-density residential
development. Below is the subdistrict text (in italics), followed by staff analysis (in bold),
The Mission Subdistrict is located on the south side of Oil Well Road, approximately one-
quarter mile west of Everglades Boulevard, and consists of 21.72 acres. The purpose of this
Subdistrict is to provide for churches and related uses, including community outreach. The
following uses are allowed:
a) Churches. [Allowed in Exhibit A, List of Permitted Uses, item A.I.]
b) Child care centers - must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a church within the
Subdistrict. [Allowed in Exhibit A, item A.2.]
c) Private schools - must be not~for-pnJjit and affiliated with a church within the
Subdistrict. [Allowed in Exhibit A, item A,3.]
d) 1ndividual and family social services (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day
care centers, adult and handicapped only) - must be not-for-profit and affiliated with a
church within the Subdistrict. (Allowed in Exhibit A, item A.4, ]
e) Medical outreach to the community. to include activities such as administering i'1/Zuenza
vaccine, chechng blood pressure, and conducting blood donation drives - must be not-
fiJr-pnJjit and affiliated with a church wilhin the Subdistrict. IAllowed in Exhibit A,
item A,6. ]
Soup kitchens and homeless shelters are prohibited in this Subdistrict. [Prohibited in
Exhibit A, item A.8.]
The maximum total fioor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 90,000 square feet. The
maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet zoned height, except the worship center shall
be permitted a zoned height of 35 feet. Development in this Subdistrict shall be designed to
be compatible wilh the existing, and allowed future, development in the surrounding area.
[(1) Total floor area, consistent with subdistrict text, is provided in Exhibit B,
Development Standards, itcm 0,1. (2) Maximum building heights, consistent with
subdistrict text, arc provided in Exhibit B, itcm A., at top of second page. (3)
Rcgarding compatibility determination, Comprehensive Planning staff defers to
Zoning Services staff as they view the project in its entirety.]
1n the alternate to the foregoing uses, measures of development intensity, and development
standards, this Subdistrict may be developed with single family dwellings in accordance
with the Residential Estates Subdistrict. [Provided for in Exhibit A, item A.7., and
Exhibit B, item C.]
Property adjacent to this Subdistrict shall not qualifY/or the Transitional Conditional Use.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-Pl2009-2496
,",prll 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3128t11
Page 3 of 16
Packet Page -1915-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
[This provision is applicable in reviewing development proposals for adjacent lands to
determine consistency with the GGAMP; therefore, there is no need to include this text
in the PUD - and it is not included.)
Regarding item A.5 on Exhibit A, job training and vocational rehabilitation services not for
profit and affiliated with Emmanuel Lutheran Church - SIC code 8331, staff notes this specific
use does not correlate to any uses listed in the proposed subdistrict. However, at the CCPC
Transmittal hearing (Octo her 20(9) for the related GMP amendment petition, discussion ensued
regarding the types of uses proposed and that would be considered acceptable under the umbrella
of "church" use, The CCPC took a broad view. Subsequently, the BCC endorsed CCPC
recommendation. Accordingly, staff is of tile opinion that this use - with the same limitation as
others as to church affiliation and not-for-profit status - may be deemed consistent with the
proposed subdistrict.
In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of
Collier County, the following [FLUE] policies shall be implemented for new development and
redevelopment projects, where applicable.
Policy 7. J: T1Je County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their
properties to .{ranting collector and arterial roads. except where no such connection can he
made without violating inlersection .\pacing requirements of the Land Development Code._lStaff
Comment: As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, the sole access is to CR 858, a collector
road.]
Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help
reduce vehiele ("Ongestion on ncarhy col/cctor and arterial roads and minimize the need for
traffic signals. [Staff Comment: As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, this project has a
single acccss point. Due to the naturc of the allowcd uses, a strect s)'stem is not envision cd.
~onetheless, the PUD Master Plan depicts a looped parking lot drive,]
Policy 7.3: AI/ new and exisling dcvelopments shall he encouraged to connecl Iheir local streets
and Iheir illlerconneetion point with adjoining neighborhoods or other developmenls regardless
{If land use 1)1Je.JStaff Commcnt: Givcn the naturc of the proposcd uses, the expected lack
of a strcct systcm - rather, a parking lot/drive - and thc low density dcvclopment existing
or allowed on adjacent propcrties (1 dwelling unit per 2,25 acres), project intcrconnections
are not feasiblc or appropriatc.)
Policy 7.4: The County shall cncouragc ncw developments 10 provide wallwble communities
with a blend of densities. common open spaces. civic(acililies and a range {If housing prices and
types. (Staff Commcnt: Density and housing types are not applicable given thc proposed
uses. The PUD Master Plan indicatcs the rcquired open space will be far cxccedcd. Since
no d(,viation is rcquested, sidcwalks will be requircd per thc LDC.)
Based upon the aho\e analysis. the proposed PUD may he deemed consistent with the Golden
Gate Area Master Plan.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ.PL2009.2496
Apfl121. 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 4 of 16
Packet Page -1916-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic
Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period, Therefore, the subject
application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP). Mitigation is provided as required.
Oil Well Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 119,
Oil Well Road between Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard, The project generates 90
p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 8.91% impact on Oil Well Road (pre-
widening capacity is 1,100 trips); or a 4.74% impact (post-widening capacity is calculated at
1,900 trips), This segment of Oil Well Road currently has a remaining capacity of 173 trips
(1,063 trips post-widening), and is currently at LOS "D" as reflected by the 201 0 AUlR,
Everglades Boulevard Impacts: The second concurrency link that is impacted by this project is
Link 135, Everglades Boulevard between Oil Well Road and Golden Gate Boulevard, The
project generatcs 36 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 4.00% impact on
Everglades Boulevard. This segment of Everglades Boulevard currently has a remaining
capacity of594 trips, and is currently at LOS "e" as reflected by the 2010 AUIR,
The next concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 136, Everglades Boulevard
between Oil Well Road and Immokalee Road. The project generates 31 p.m. peak hour, peak
direction trips, which represents a 3.40% impact on Everglades Boulevard. This segment of
Everglades Boulevard currently has a remaining capacity of 528 trips, and is currently at LOS
"C" as reflected by the 2010 AUIR.
lmmokalee Road Impacts: Another concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 46,
Immokalee Road between Oil Well Road and Everglades Boulevard. The project generates 22
p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 2.51 % impact on 1mmokalee Road. This
segment of Everglades Boulevard currently has a remaining capacity of 443 trips, and is
currently at LOS "C" as reflected by the 201 0 AUIR,
No subsequent concurrency links are significantly impacted by this project.
Transportation Staff Notes: The project has proposed a trip generation cap of 323 PM Peak
Hour, Peak Direction, unadjusted trips, This trip generation limit is based (in part) on the 65,000
square foot church use. Staff has further analyzed the TIS by substituting a 90.000 square foot
Church use, and the weekday, PM Peak hour analysis indicates only a nine-trip increase in total
trips, In both scenarios. a ] 000 seat limit is proposed on the Church use.
Consen'atioD and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff
found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element
(CCME).
GMP Conclusion:
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed
rezoning to CPUD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ-PL2009-2496
April 21 , 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 5 of 16
Packet Page -1917-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval,
approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition, A finding of consistency with the
FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff
believes the petition is consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the
GMP discussion, The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as
previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent
with the CCME, Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with
the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria
upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code
(LDC) Subsection 10.02.l3,B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to
as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.03.05.1, Nature of Requirements of Planning
Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to
support the CCPC's recommendation, The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to
support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these
subseetions is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff
offers the following analyses:
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff is recommending approval subjeet to the
Environmental condition contained in Exhibit F of the PUD doeument. Due to the amended
LDC requirements, this project is not .required to be heard by the Environmental Advisory
Council unless that action is a directive of the CCPC or BCC. The project site consists of 1.7
acres of native vegetation that generally consists of pine flatwoods. The remainder of the 21.72-
acre site is generally disturbed due to the historical clearing for agrieultural u.~es, A minimum of
15 % of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier
County, The proposed O.26-acre upland preserve area is located at the northeast portion of the
project site, No listed species were found on site. Any impacts to existing "other surface
waters" on the project site shall be permitted through the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) permitting process at the first development order.
Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues.
Zoning Services Review: The Master Plan shows the location of the preserve area, lake and
storm water management areas, the worship center, the community fellowship center, the child
and adult education facility, athletic fields and the area proposed for water treatment. Buffers are
shown along the project boundaries. Primary acccss is shown on Oil Well Road and a 30-foot
wide interconnection is ShO\Nll to the private roadway along the far westem boundary.
Staff has a concem about one use proposed by the applicant. The app]ican~ as part of Exhibit A,
Section A #5 has included garden plots as part of the usc "job training and vocational
rehabilitation services" under thc auspices of SIC code 833] as shown in underlined text below:
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ-PL2009-2496
April 21,2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 6 of 16
Packet Page -1918-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Job training and vocational rehabilitation services not for profit and operated with a
church or place of worship permitted in this CFPUD. Vocational rehabilitation
services shall not include uses such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit
noise beyond the boundaries of the su~iect property, but shall include I!arden vlots.
It is not that staff believes the use is inappropriate within this project; staff believes the use can
be appropriate within the project, consistent with GMP Mission Subdistrict, and compatible with
the surrounding Estates zoned lands, if the use is limited to an accessory use to a Church and
Places of Worship as the principal use, As explained in an email message from the applicant, the
garden plot use:
. , . would be a community garden for church members and any other interested
members of the surrounding community to develop together, and then to share the
produce among themselves, or if there is excess, to share it with local non-profit
agencies who distribute food to those with needs. We will not be selling any
produce, and not opening a u-pick or farmers market.
Staff is of the opinion that listing the garden plot use as a principal use and as part of job training
and vocational rehabilitation services is not in keeping with the description of Job Training and
Vocational Rehabilitation Services, SIC code 8331, as that use is described in the SIC manual
excerpt shown below.
Establishments primarily engaged in providing manpower training and vocational
rehabilitation and habilitation services for the unemployed, the underemployed, the
handicapped, and to persons who have a job market disadvantage because of lack of
education, job skill or experience. Included are upgrading and job development
services. skill training, world-ai-work orientation, and vocational rehabilitation
counseling. This industry includes offices of,\pecialists providing rehabilitation and job
counseling. Also included are establishments primarily engaged in providing work
experience for rehabilitees.
Additionally, including the use as part of Job Training and Vocational Rehabilitation Services,
SIC code 8331 is contrary to the purpose of the GMP Mission Subdistrict to provide community
outreach only if it is ". . . . affiliated with a church within the Subdistrict.
The applicant's agent argues that gardens are an allowable use in the current Estates (E) zoning
district. The surrounding properties also have a zoning desib'TIation of Estates, therefore the
agent contends that the garden plot use is an appropriate principal use in the proposed project.
Staff respectfully disagrees with that assessment. The E zoning district docs allow crop raising,
but only as an accessory use as shown below (Excerpt from LDC Section 2.03,OI,B with bolding
added for emphasis):
1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses
that are allowable as accessolJ' or conditional uses in the Estates district (E).
a. Permitted uses.
I. Single:(amily dwelling.
2. Family care facilities. subject to section 5.05.04.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ-PL2009-2496
April 21, 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3128/11
Page 7 of 16
Packet Page .1919-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
3. Essential services, as set forth in section 2. OJ. 03.
4. Schools. public. including "Educational plants."
b. A ccessory Uses.
1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidel1lal to uses permitted as of
right in the (E) district.
2. Field crops raisedfor the consumption by persons residing on the premises,
As shown above, the E district does not allow field crops as a stand-alone principal use, The use
is limited to an accessory capacity, and the crops grown must be grown for consumption of the
rcsiding persons, i,e., no sales to other persons or the public. This is similar to staffs position
for the proposed church. The garden plot use would need to be an accessory to the church, rather
than "persons residiug on the premises" since there will not be anyone residing on the premises
as there would be in the Estates zoning district. That would allow the use to occur as a
community outreach, consistent with the Mission District's purpose. The prohibition of salcs
would keep the general intent of what is shown also.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to he compatible with, and complementary to, the
surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the
subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and
surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development
standards (building heights, setbacks. landscape buffers. etc.), building mass, building location
and orientation, amount and type of open space and location. traffic generation/attraction, etc.
There has to be a balance between the adjacent exi;1ing and uses and what is allowable by the
GMP.
The overall area is rather sparsely development with single-fan1ily home sites; however, one lot
abutting the subject site to the west is occupied by a home site. Across the private roadway are
three other home sites. To the south, the homes are more than 400 feet away from the property
boundary. (See illustration on page 2 of this staff report.) To the north is Oil Well Road, and to
the cast the nearest residential use is on a tract ofland whose perimeter boundary is over 650 feet
away,
The applicant has provided a 75-foot wide setback along the eastern, southem and westem
boundaries. Water management areas and the athletic fields are located with the setback area,
but there are no buildings in the setback. Additionally, the applicant is providing a 25-foot wide
type B Landscape buffer. According to the LDC, a type B buffer would be required between the
residential uses and the church. That required type B landscape buffer is only 15 feet wide. The
LDC does not require any landscape butTer to be as wide as 25 feet so the applicant is providing
a wider buffer to separate the uses.
Staff is of the opinion that this project will he compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and
thus consistency with FLUE Policy 5.4.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-Pl2009.2496
April 21. 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 8 of 16
Packet Page -1920-
6/28/2011 Item 17,8.
Deviation Discussion:
The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC, The deviation is
listed in PUD Exhibit E,
Deviation No, I seeks relief from LDC Section 5,03,02, E,2., Fences and Walls to not require a
fence or wall along the southeast and west property lines, This Section of the LDC requires that
whcnever a non-residential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned
district, said non-residential development shall provide a masonry wall or precast concrete wall
or fence. Walls at this location are not in keeping with the character of estates zoned properties,
Petitioner '.I' Rationale: The applicant provided the following justification for this deviation:
This deviation is being requested to maintain the rural character of the acijacent zoned
residential property. Constructing fences or walls acijacent to Estate sized lots would
impact the rural character of this property, Further justification for the request is set
forth on the CFPUD Master Plan with expanded setbacks, buffers and the proposed
development regulations designed to enhance compatibility with adjacent and nearby
properties. Also, see Exhibit E, Item G pertaining to Walls.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: This deviation would allow the developer to provide an
altemative to fences and walls, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed increased sctback and
buffer width altemative is a<;ceptable; therefore, staff does not object. Therefore, the deviation
seems appropriate,
Zoning and Land Development Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation,
finding that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02,13.A.3, the netitioner has demonstrated that
"the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safety and welfare of the
community" and LDC Section 1 0.02.13.B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation
is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least eauivalent to literal application of
such regulations,"
LDC Subsection 10,03,05.1.2 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners.. . shall
show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." Additionally. Section 10,02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires
the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the
additional criteria as also noted below. [Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold,
non-italicized font]:
PUD Findinl!s: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 statcs that, "In support of its recommendation, the
CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria"
(Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font):
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-PL2009.2496
April 21. 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 9 of 16
Packet Page -1921-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
I. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas. traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water. and other utilities.
Staff has reviewed the proposed rezone and believes tbe uses and property development
regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. Therefore, the
commitments made by the applicant provide adequate assurances that the proposed
change will not adversely affect living conditions in the area.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed. particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made .fi)r the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense,
Documents submittcd with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be
rcquired to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that
appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of
infra.~tructure will be provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives. and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals,
objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the zoning analysis of
this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be
found consistent with the overall GMP if stafrs recommendation for increased perimeter
propcrty setbacks is adopted to ensurc compliance with GMP FLUE Policy 5,4.
4. 171e internal and external compatibilily o.fproposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrielions on design, and b/.!fJering and screening
requiremenls.
Staff has provided a review of the proposed uses and believes that the project will be
compatible with the surrounding area.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed 10 serve the
developmenz.
The amount of opcn space sct aside for th.is project mcets the minimum requiremcnt of the
LDC.
6. The timing or sequence (!f develupmenl fi)r the purpose of assuring lhe adequacy 0.(
available improvements andfacilities, both public and private.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ.Pl2009-2496
April 21. 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28/11
Page 10 of 16
Packet Page -1922-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project
at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP
Transportation Elcment consistency review. In addition, the project's development must
comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development
approvals are sought.
7. The ability oj the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting roadway infrastructure for rezoning purposes. The
applicant proposed to provide the project's own water treatment plant as shown on the
Master Plan. The issue of adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when
development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with P UD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The petitioner is seeking one deviation to allow design flexibility in compliance with the
purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06A).
This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be
required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviation
proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section lO.02.13.A.3, the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the clements may be waived without a dctrimental effect
on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section lO.02.13,B,5.h, the
petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a
degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the
Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the
deviation.
Rezone Findin!!:s: LDC Subsection 10.03'()5.I. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning ofland,
the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County
Commissioners. ..shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed
change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are
provided in boldJont):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies oj
Ihe Fulure Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
The GMP analysis provided an in-depth revicw of the uewly created Mission Subdistrict.
That subdistrict was established for this property only. The zoning analysis provides an in-
dcpth review of the proposed changes. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is
consistent. with GMP FLUE Policy 5,4 requiring the project to be compatible with
neighborhood development. Thus, staff recommcnds that this petition be deemed
consistent with the FLUE ofthe GMP. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the
CCME. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistcnt with the
GMP,
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-Pl2009-2496
April 21. 2011 ccpe
Revised: 3/28111
Page 11 of 16
Packet Page -1923-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
2. The existing land use pattern;
Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and
Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis.
Staff helieves the proposed rezone is appropriate giyen the existing land use pattern and
the fact that the petition has sought and gained approved of a GMP sub district to
specifically allow the uses proposed.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;
The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district because the
surrounding area does not have any nearby lands designated as PUD zoned tracts,
However, the rezone to PUD is consistent with the GMP Mission Subdistrict land use
designation,
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposedfor change.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn, bringing
the Estates zoned land into a zoning district that will allow the uses approved in the
Mission GMP Subdistrict ofthe FLlJE.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary',
The proposed change is warranted based upon the relatiyely recently created Subdistrict
designation for the subject property. The proposed rezoning brings the subject property
into compliance with that designation because it establishes appropriate zoning of tbe tract
and establishes the uses contemplated in that Subdistrict. Without rezoning, the Estates
zoned tracts could not be developed with the proposed uses or with the proposed property
development regulations.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood;
Staff is of the opinion that with the commitments made by the applicant, this petition can
been deemed consistent County's land use policies that are reflected by tbe Future Land
Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore, the proposed rezone should not adversely
im pact living conditions in the area.
~ IVhether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible wilh surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes
or p,,!;ected types of vehicular Irallic, including activit)' during construction phases of Ihe
development, or olhen-rise affect public safen',
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD, PUDZ-PL2009-2496
April 21,2011 CCPC
Revised: 3/28111
Page 12 of 16
Packet Page -1924-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the
five-year planning period with the mitigation provided as required, Therefore, the subject
application can be found consistent Vlith Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP).
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The proposed rezone should not create drainage or surface water problems because the
LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce
the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other
specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
If this petition were approved, any subsequcnt devclopment would need to comply with the
applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This
project's property development regulations do not indicate that exceedingly tall structures
would be included in the project; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light
and air to adjacent areas; thus the development proposed, if approved, should not
negatively affect light and air permeation into adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area;
This is a subjective determination based npon anticipated results, which may be internal or
external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors
including zoning; however zoning by itself mayor may not affect values, since value
determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be
marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
The proposed zoning change sbould not be a deterrent to tbe improvcment of adjacent
properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
Tbc proposed rezone does not constitnte a grant of special privilege.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning;
The property currently has a zoning designation of Estates, The tract could be developed
within tbe parameters of tbat zoning designation; bowever, tbe petitioner is seeking this
rezone in compliance witb LDC provisions for such action, Tbe petition can be evaluated
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church eFPUD, PUDZ-Pl2009-2496
April 21. 2011 cepe
Revised: 3128111
Page 13 of 16
Packet Page -1925-
6/28/2011 Item 17,8.
and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff helieves
the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public
interest will be maintained.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County;
The petitioner proposes to develop a maximum of 90.000 square feet of uses fuat would
include worship/church and related social services uses, including a 300-person child and adult
day care facility, job training and vocational rehabilitation services, a 450-studcnt private school,
or in the alternative, development of a maximum of 10 single-family residential dwelling units
The pctitioner has proposed property dcvelopment regulations to allow establishment of
those uses. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developcr
commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the
community.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sitcs in the County that could accommodate the uses proposcd;
howcvcr, this is uot the determining factor when evaluating tlte appropriateness of a
particular zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with
the GMP and the LDC; and staff docs not review other sites in conjunction with a specific
petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of
the staff report.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree (~f site alteration, which
would he required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site
alteration and this project would undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state,
and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval
proccss and again later as part of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels ofsen'ice adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and
as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinancc.
as amended.
The project will have to mect all applicable critcria set forth in LDC Section 6,02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all
applicable goals and objectives of thc GMP regarding adequate public facilities, cxcept as it
may be excmpt by federal rcgulations. This petition has been rcviewed by county staff that
is responsible for jurisdictional elemcnts of the GMP as part of the rczone process and
those staff persons have concluded that uo Lcvcl of Sen'ice will be adversely impacted with
the commitments contained in the T'UD document.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-Pl2009-2496
April 21. 2011 ccpe
ReVised: 3/28/11
Page 14 of 16
Packet Page -1926-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
18. Such other factors, standard~, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare,
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The NIM meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on Wednesday, August 25, 2010
commencing at 5:40 P.M., at the Collier County UF/IFAS Extension Office, located at 14700
lmmokaJee Road, Naples, Florida, Three (3) people from the public signed in as well as the
Applicant's team (Robert Duane & Terry Cole, Hole Montes; Rich Yovanovich, Esq.; Tom
Gemmer and Stcve Wigdahl, Emmanuel Lutheran Church; and Ted Treesh, TR Transportation).
County staff in attendance was Kay Deselem.
Bob Duane made the presentation and discussed the proposed request for the CFPUD Rezoning,
and went over the recently approved GMP Amendment and discussed the Permitted Uses and
Master Plan. Residents were also advised that a median opening is planned to access the
property from Oil Well Road that is proposed to be relocated to a location previously planned
just to the west of the subject property to a location depicted on the Master Plan.
Residents seemed interested to learn of the proposed facilities but had a few questions, as
follows:
I, A resident asked when the facility would be built, and Bob Duane advised them it
would be done in phases but construction could commence in tlrree years;
2. Another resident asked if any Commercial Uses were planned on the north side of Oil
Well Road across the street from the proposed Church, and Bob Duane indicated that this
was not the case;
3, The same resident asked how far the entrance to the Church was from Everglades
Boulevard. Bob Duane advised that it was ,"2000 feet away.
The meeting adjourned shortly before 6 PM and the residents were advised there would be
Public Hearings later this fall and they would be notified, [Submitted by the petitioner's agent]
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on March 29, 2011.
RECOMMENDA nON:
Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County
Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-PL2009-2496 to the BCC with a recommendation
of approval.
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ-PL2009-2496
April 21 , 2011 CCPC
Revised: 3128/11
Page 15 of 16
Packet Page .1927-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
PREPARED BY:
y~~
K.A. SELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
-.3/:13/( I
, 'DATE
REVIEWED BY:
'\.
)
I.
',! --
RA YMO D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
~. 'J "
:J - .. I " . ,
-
DATE
."\ .i~. c-----L__ j
11/." . r- I
. '/:" ,/ /, j ~'-..d-._---
, 1. LlAM D. LORENZ. JR.,F.E.. DIRfCl OR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
~~ .3e,..;(.e.:1t(
DATE
APPROVED BY:
----....,
//"""', ;
- ...'. ( , /
/ l.' "'2- / ,- ,.-' .... /'
\ .. /'" /.._ _.,.---~/., >. .-7 .
.~ . " /~/ /W--- _/~ /.F/ / _./~'/r~_"-'-'
Nit\( C.A.:OlALANG(1lDA-:'DEPDTY"'ADMIN IST~ \TOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
LI.l.. -I;
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the June 28. 2011 Bmrd of County Commissioners Meeting
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church CFPUD. PUDZ.PL2009.2496
April 21. 2011 CCPC
ReVised: 3/23/11
Page 16 of 16
Packet Page -1928-
6/28/2011 Item 17,8,
ORDINANCE NO. 10-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE
ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY
FACILITIES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CFPUD)
ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNO\VN AS
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF
NAPLES, INC. CFPUD, TO ALLOW 90,000 SQUARE FEET OF
USES TO INCLUDE WORSHIP/CHURCH AND RELATED
SOCIAL SERVICES, A 300 PERSON CHILD AND ADULT
DAY CARE FACILITY, JOB TRAINING AND VOCATIONAL
RElIABILIT ATION, A 450 PERSON PRIV ATE SCHOOL; OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF OIL WELL ROAD, IN SECTION 19,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 21.72+/- ACRES
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; AKD BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
and Robert 1. Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran
Church of Naples, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the real propcrty more particularly described in Exhibit D,
attached hercto and incorporated hercin by reference, located in Section 19, Township 48 South,
Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Estates (E) Zoning District to a
Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Zoning District for a 21.72+/- acre
Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church
PUDZ-PL2009.2496
Revised 4/25/11
Page 1 01'2
Packet Page -1929-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
project known as Emmanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church of Naples, Inc, CFPUD, subject to
compliance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated herein and by reference
made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number
2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amcndcd
accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effeetive upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. this
day of
,2010.
ATTEST:
DW1GHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
. Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
A pproyed as to form
and legal sufliciency:
Steven T. Williams
)"."...! "'\\
Assistant County Attornev,. ""
. ~"
Atlachlllents: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses
Exhibit 13 - Development Standards
Exhibit C - Master P!en
Exhibit D - Lcgal Description
Exhibit E - Deviations li'om the LDC
Exhibit F - Development Commitments
CP\I O.CPS.O I 040\37
ElllllJ,-J.I1uel Evangelical Lutheran Church
PU 1J7..PI.2009.2496
Revised .'{,/25,.1 11
Page 2 of2
Packet Page .1930-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
EXHIBIT "A"
LIST OF PERMITTED USES
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES pun
No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for
other than the following:
A. Principal Uses: SIC GROUP
No building or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or
land used, in whole or in part, for othcr than the following:
1. Churches and Places of Worship 8661
2. Child Care Services 8351
Not for profit and operated with a church or place of worship 8351
permitted in this CFPUD
3. Private Schools 8211
Not for profit and operated witl1 a church or place of worship 8243
permitted in this CFPUD (except boarding schools, and military 8244
academies). 8299
4. Social Services, individual and family (activity centers, elderly or
handicapped only; day care centers, adult and handicapped only);
must be not for profit and operated with a church or place of 8322
worship pennitted in this CFPUD.
5. Job training and vocational rehabilitation scrviccs not for profit 8331
and operated with a church or place of worship permitted in this
CFPUD. Vocational rehabilitation services shall not include uses
such as outboard or diesel engine repair that could emit noise
beyond the boundaries of the subject property.
6. Medical outreach to the community, to include activities such as
administering influenza vaccine, checking blood pressure and
conducting blood donation drives not for profit and operated with
a church or place of worship pe1111itted in this CFPUD.
7. Single family residential dwellings as an alternative to non-
residential uscs permitted in this CFPUD. (Also see Exhibit B -
Development Intensity)
8. Any other principal and relatcd use that is determined to be
comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals
pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code
(LDC), however, soup kitchens and homeless shelters are
prohibited.
Emmanuel Evangelical Luthctall Ch\lrch rUD2-I'L2009-2496
Laslrevised: 04-25-11
Page 1 of 10
Packet Page -1931-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
B. Accessorv Uses:
Accessory uscs customarily associatcd with Pcrmitted Principal Uscs including but
not limited to:
1. Rccreational facilitics including outdoor play areas and athletic field,
administration offices and facilities, and youth recrcation centers indoor to
support church uses.
2. Water and wastewater facilities for serving this CFPUD only.
3. Garden Plots, limited to an accessory use to the Churches and Places of Worship,
SIC 8661. Garden Plots shall be allowed on an interim basis prior to the
construction of the Churches and Places of Worship. Garden Plots are also an
allowable Accessory Use after the construction of Churches and Places of
Worship.
4. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to
the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in
the Land Development Code (LDC).
C. ]'rcscrvc Area Uses:
No building or structure, or part thereof; shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the CFPUD Master Plan other than thc
following:
1. Passive recreation areas such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks are allowed
in the preserve area, as long as any clearing required to facilitatc these uses does
not impact the minimum required area to be preserved.
2. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the
forcgoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the
Land Development Code (LDC).
Ellll11allm:1 Evangelical Llltheran Church I'UDZ_PL200lL].j'J6
Last revised: 04-25-11
Page 2 of 10
Packet Page -1932-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
EXHIBIT "B"
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES pun
Development of the EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY
FACILITIES PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinauce and applicable
sections of the LDC and Gro-wth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of
any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development
plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate.
Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most
similar district, the Community Facility District (CF) of the LDC shall apply.
Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the PUD. Standards not
specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections ofthe LDC in effect as
of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat.
TABLE I
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA
N/A
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
N/A
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
N/A
PERIMETER SETBACKS
75 feel east property line
75 feet west and southwest property line
75 feet south property line
75 feet north property line
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
25 feet
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
25 feet or perimeter setback whi chever is
greater
MINIMUM REAR YARD
25 feet or perimeter setback whichever is
greater
MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK
25 feet
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
PRINCIP AL STRUCTURES
'/, building zoned height (BH)
Emmamlel Evangelical Lutheran Church PL'DZ-PL2009-2496
Last revised: 04-2S-l1
Page 3 of 10
Packet Page -1933-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
MAXIMUM BUILDl~G HEIGHT 2 stories not to exceed 30 feet zoned building height
or 38 feet actual building height; however, the
Worship Center shall not exceed a zoned height of
35 feet and an actual height of 42 feet.
B. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
FRONT SETBACK
25 feet (see *Note 1)
SIDE SETBACK
10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater
REAR SETBACK
10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater
PRESERVE SETBACK
10 feet or perimeter setback whichever is greater
PERIMETER SETBACK
75 feet
MINIMUM DISTA~CE
BETWEEN ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES
] 0 feet
MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED
1 story, not 10 exceed 25 feet zoned building height
and 30 feet actual BH
*Note 1 Athletic field is permitted in setback area including portion of the existing lake as
shown on CFPUD Master Plan;
C. STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE
Residential uses in accordance with the Estates District if non-residential uses are not
developed on the subject property.
D, DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
1. A maximum of 90.000 SF. of total noor arca is allowed in this Community
Facilitics PUD and the numbcr of seats for the Worship Center shall not exceed
1,000 seats.
2. Maximum number of school students is 450.
3. Maximum nwnbcr of Day Care Center par1icipants is 300.
4. In lieu of permitted community facilities allowed by this CrUD, ten (10) single
L1l11ily dwelling units are permitted.
Eml1\anncl Evangl::ica\ Lutheran Chtlrd\ I'UDZ-PL2li()9-2496
L\slrevised: 04-25-]]
Page 4 of]O
Packet Page -1934.
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
E. LANDSCAPING
1. Seventy five foot (75') wide buffer areas are required along the east, west and
southwest property lines abutting residential development as shown on the
CFPUD Master Plan. However, play fields are permitted in a portion of the 75
foot wide buffer area shown on the west and southwest property lines along with
an existing lal(e.
2. A twenty five foot (20') wide Type "D" buffer is required along Oil Well Road
and twenty-five foot (25') wide Type "B" buffers are required along the east, west
and southwest south property lines as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan.
F. LIGHTING (Per Policy 5,1.1 of the Golden Gate Master Plan set forth below):
Consistent with public safety requirements, street, recreational and structure lighting shall
be placed, constructed and maintained in such manner as to prevent or reduce Ii ght
pollution. The following standards shall apply:
a, If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to
protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded
such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-prcssure sodium lamps are
encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged.
1. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type
and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that
light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood
pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric
utility and as appropriate for a rural area.
2. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be
mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past
the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be
illuminated.
b. Where lighting of recreational areas is required, such lighting shall be mounted so
as to focus illumination on the areas intended to be illuminated, and to limit the
amount oflight that extends outside of the intended area.
c. All lighting associated with the Athletic Field shall be tumcd off no later than
9:30 P.M.
G, ATHLETIC FIELD OPERATION
1. The Athletic Field shall only be permitted to be in use between thc hours of 7:00
A.M. and 9:00 P.M.
El-:lm81H\el Evang.elical Lutheran Clmfch PUDZ-PL2009-2496
Lastrt:vised: 04-25-1\
Page 5 of 10
Packet Page -1935-
6/28/2011 Item 17,8.
H. GARDEN PLOTS
1. U-Pick or on-site sales of produce is prohibited.
2. The maximum area for the garden plots shall be limited to 10% of property or 002
acres.
3. Garden plots shall be located outside the 75 foot perimeter setback areas,
4. Maximum number of automobiles shall be limited to ten at anyone time.
5. Access to garden plots and parking areas shall be a gravel surface.
6. Temporary sanitary facility to be provided.
7. A Site Improvement Plan shall be required to be approved by the County prior to
the utilization of garden plots.
8. The development of garden plots shall not vest the property for PUD sunsetting
purposes,
1. WALLS
1. A six-foot high wall shall be constructed as shown on the CFPUD Master Plan
adjacent to residential development. The wall shall be constructed prior to the
utilization of the Athletic Field.
Emmanud Evangelic~1 LlItheran Church I'\JDZ-PL200q-2~46
Last revised: 04-25-11
Page 6 of 10
Packet Page -1936-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
, ~ i \' I
'\'1 ' '
[hi \ ' !;j
, \ I I;~~
11 1'1 I,h
,I) I' ',m
'~ \ l,ue,,^,,"(1PU'1j
'""'<;3:P>lIOZ
Iii'" I ,. '
'\; M Ilr !! ,.,,". ~:::::,~'~';o:;':;,. "
jJ~H, 1il\\ i, ~l' ,-____..L--,;;;""''';;;"----~ [-\
1~lnY' 1'\' !';' .~; G 0 J ODD ~ III I
~I'I,) "I Iii r- " n r I_I..
Irl ~ '\1\ [ Iii I J? ~ ~ I - I-==Q n r-d0~1 11 I 1:1
'l'~d "\!,ill,' ~I ,:oJ i I
I, II~~I\! i III'!' 'II ;:1\ I ~ ~Bi II I
I I rl \'\ [oj! I 'i-- - Hi ~. 0 . I
\' "1~1\11'hll l!lJ..;= IL 'o~ Jr---''---llP 1 IW I!
'\ (,\-g \1\ \: ,I[ 'I ! J ,- . I " ~m I .~
II, ,"," I' ~I: ,I --- I I, ]l~ll ~,
t I~Jr~ II \'ilrJ~~~ -l I ,,"::J C --Ii ~t
!II'":~'I\\I:".j:Ii'I) -- i II I I!~
\I~[T I' !l"~~ I ~~~ I ':...
i. H', I' ;:':: Il-'=-"'..:..I~';!. [. c:; ,;,
11.;1~1 '1"li ~I '~'I: = .' ~ ~ i. b I I ~~~
I '-I,:' I ',ji: ~:i: i i i-,,----- i i .:
, 'Iii~ ,1111' ~.,.,'x' I, "' U.-I I ~-.::J:-"-.
1:' I '1I'Jlrl' .1',1f\: :1::1 I ': i J i I ~n ,;<
I ,. II... ,.'. I L--_ '---. .. ,-"'--- ---.--, ,-" I r'"'\ I .,1
, "1 ., -, C7 ~. u-,-----c:::r-~.-.., IJ \....J ' i
I,.,)",r;: ii' ~ I'i
".'1'1-' _'; ..___' ~~o
;: 1"i\!~II\';'1 J W i lm____________n _"'~~"'~~~___.m._=-m-=-~~~~II,
II, ' '!,'I,W . .~. . 'ldlJJ U Ul~ H I, I
1111' i; I, ! ~jr :~// ( ~', \,
t.~ l:l- 'i/ ' . 'r::- ~~ - 1 -- - -- J
i! r", .10,;,".':1",,0 ~;V/. '/"r.,:7:W,/,/::'J;;;' ."q,...p'M."L",~"M '- -~.'
". ,///._ ,,/.', JO~"9 ."C"~"'" ,~. ,d,l. '~!M ,Sl
-1~li~ 1,,\ ~.~ . ~~
,N , l"3l0'EO'S ~-UOI:P""
.: I :lio:~li~ i-,',,:,I._ ~jo: )1- ~J I.~~ ["''''^Pu'",^::~.!3','~~~ci.'npu''l J~dll~MJill.llW!JilclON'
,_ . _ t 'ON UOlle~~o:
~T :~ i : ! >-- / :'
1'1" .'1 '!F"":--='71 -I~ j
. :\: ~:t 1-' '/' :., Ii
I :" ',~"" "~I'
, 1'1 I liH;~-~'''-''! 1
:., I,',,' I I,:'~_"__~~l.-~__::
, -."--" ~.~l
\\,..!'~' j\! /' i'~\~------~-'~~- ;-;-~ t 1 ~! ! ~ 8 ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~
1"':- !I!, .1 r ------.----,L.,---;J I ;:).~ :.;;I"'o",,"';"';";o~
i~l : ~ j' ~~- -~~~l~~t~ t~! "~~l'
: 'I ;~Y/7T."T~--+-"--'-~ ~ ~ .~ ~
! 'I :' 'I. . /)//i;;.:;/!(r.//::j ]~,"._".
'\J' ,.,'" ~:::1>~,0~6~f":L u .-
:., JiU"ll:'.' """oU" .~, 0<1'.1 .PIt", .;~ ~ 1. ~ ""
, =r - ~ ~;l ~!
Y,,=__ =_.;.;._"}::~-;ii~~-,~i~~,,jQ.._- 1- c ~ ~ @I
_ _'," 0 _ ~!~ __
~I *
'ill .
I:
~.,
~
"
d
0'
i
00
0"
-"
o.
~~
~~
;; ~
.0
, ,
H
" "
r~
11-1
~~~ -
._0
t~~ .B
H11'~
~~] !
Ii:
,~ ~
~ 0
Hi
> 0
.
.~ '"
:<!: :<!: ~
.I
8'
~
I
'I
' ,
!
;
ii'
I
"
.
"
d
::.;';
. ,
~ ~ i
:J.. ii.'"
.... '" oi-
~ I " ~"
....'OJ.'i
" :-1
e! ~ rl
:1-;:.g
~~~
.0
c.u"'"
0..<:;
~~
NI *- 11- ~~ *- *- *- it- *-
c: '" "'... <:> 0 ..,~'"
~! '" '" ~ ~ ~ "! ...r-,
ti'" "':::..... ~ - ~
.,
.2$
- ~ ~ ~
~~~!
:l:EEi5
~Ht:~
tll.!' ~
~~:~
c gtt~
~ ~ ~~~~
OJ :> F ~ " ~
_~ ~'" <>:: "J:
'" i :2..
I
,,-]
~ ~ Ii!. :g ~
13 E C .. a ~
~ f~ .i-;:-;
liiliQJ~i!
~::>.'t"-]:5.t&j
: ~ "
~~
I' ':
0,
, ~.i:'.
"3' '~~
o ON
_ ON
, ,
I
.**
I
.111
Packet Page -1937-
.
,
~ :;:; i ~
I ~ I -
~ m
~ .
i i3 ~ ~
I m ~ ~
:11
hi
ill
".;:.~
'",
!.
;~::i
~i:
'~I
"
<'
,!! i
iU
z
<
-'
..
,,0:
W
....
....'"
-<
~~
>< .
w..
"
.:
u:
u
!
~
.
!
~8c"
~ /;l.~
';I~
dN "
11~<.J11
il-; -~
::!'~u:~
J
5
,
,
I
,
,
.
Ii
"
~ .~
EE
....
<(
~:c
""u
We::
\.:J::J
Z:c
<(u
>
Wz
....J<(
we::
::JW
z:c
<(f-
23
2
W
~,!'
I~-~h
, "'~ '"
" N
."
<<
~ .w-~
"""
~l~
~N<
~ . .
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
EXHIBIT "0"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD
Property Description:
Tract 65A, the North 165 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet of the North 330 feet of
Tracts 80 and 81, the North 165 feet ofthc South 330 feet of Tracts 80 and 81, the South 165 feet
of Tracts 80 and 8], and all of Tracts 80A, 81A, 96 and 96A, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,
u]\JT NO. 64, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pagers) 64,
Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Fll11ll<\11l1":: EVilllgr:lica\ Lutheran Chtilcb PUD7-PI.2009-2.:196
Last l<.:vised: 04-25-11
Page 8 of 10
Packet Page -1938-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8.
EXHIBIT "E"
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC FOR THE
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES pun
Deviation No. I seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02. H., Fences and Walls to not require a
fence or wall along the west, south, and east property lines outside the boundary of the Athletic
Field. Walls will be provided adjacent to the Athletic Field as depicted on the CFPUD Master
Plan. This Section of the LDC requires that whenever a non-residential development lies
contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said non-residential development shall
provide a masonry wall or precast concrete wall or fence.
Emmanuel Evall~elical Lutheran Church PL'DZ-PL2009-2496
Las1 revised: 04-25-11
Page 9 of10
Packet Page -1939-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,
EXHIBIT "F"
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS FOR THE PROJECT
EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES PUD
1. TRANSPORT A nON
A. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as
determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic
control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as
directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at location(s) as directed by the
Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee.
B. The development within this project shall bc limited to 666 unadjusted two-way,
AM peak hour trips and/or 323 unadjusted two-way, PM pcak hour trips;
allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts
on the adjacent roadway network. l'or purposes of calculation of the weekday
AM and PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD. the lesser of the weekday
AM or PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Transportation
Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Gcncration, 8th Edition or the trip gencration
as calculated in the thcn current lTE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized.
e. A potential for interconnection with the residential properties to the west shall be
provided if the subject property develops only with single family uses and the
conditions for the use of the interconnection are acceptable to the developer and
the residential properties to the west. If the subject property is developed without
residential uses within four years of the date of adoption, then this commitment
shall no longer be deemed applicable.
2, ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Conservation/preservation areas comprising a minimum of 0.26 acres are shown
on the CFPUD Master Plan that meets the minimum of 0.26ot acres required to be
preserved by the LDe.
B. As part of the first development order application (SDP, Plat or other), the
applicant shall provide an updated listed species survey to show the property's
proximity to bear or panther habitat (primary or secondary) and indicate if any
mitigation is required by the l'WClCSl'WS. If mitigation is required, the
applicant shall coordinate said mitigation with County Environmental Staff
members.
El1llnHllllel Evangdio.::11 Lu\lu;ran Clllllcli PUDZ-PL2U09-2496
Last revised: 04-25-11
Ilage ] 0 of 10
Packet Page -1940-
180 -Friday, JUDe 3, 2011 - Naples Daily News
.' I
. ' I
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby ~iven that on TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 201" in the Boardroom, 3rd
Floor, Administration Building. Collier County Government Center, 3299 East: T.1-
miami Trail. Naples. Florida. the Board of County Commissioners will consider the
enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The
title of the proposed aidinance is as fo.lIows: . . .
AN ORDINANCE. OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COtLIER COUN-
TY. FLORIDA. AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004.41; AS AMENDED; THE COL.
UER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABUSHED THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUN.
TY,FLORIDA, .BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATlAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER-
TY FROM THE ESTATES IE) ZONING DISTRICT TO A COMMUNITY FACILITIES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ICFPUD) ZONING DISTRICT .,FOR THE PROJECT
KNOWN AS EMMANUEl EVANGEUCAl "lUTHERANCHUR'tHOF NAPLES; INC.
CFPUD. TO ALLOW 90,000 SQUARE FEET OF USES TO INCLUDE WORSHIP/CHURCH
AND RELATED SOCIAL SERVICES. A 300 PERSON CHIlD AND ADULT DAY CARE FA-
C1UTY, JOB TRAINING AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, A 450 PERSON PRIVATE
SCHOOL; Oft, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMilY RESIDEN-
TIAL DWELLING UNITS, lOCATEiDON THE SOUTH SIDE Of OIL WELL ROAD} IN SEC-
TION 19, TOWNSHIP 4B SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CON-
SISTING OF 21.72+'- ACRES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EF-
FECTIVE DATE.
Copies pf the proposed Ordinance are on file with, the Clerk to the Board .i!nd are
available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard.
NOTE; All pe:rso,ns wishing to speak' on any agenda item must register with, the
County administrator .prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an in-
dividual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recog- i
,nized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group Qr organization may be allotted
10 mirutes to speak on an item. .
Persons wishing to have wrinen or graphic materials rneluded' inth'e Board agenda
packets must submit said material iil minimum of 3 weeks prior to the. respective
public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public .hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board
will become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may. need to ensure that a .verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is based. '
If you are a person with 8 disability who needs. any accommodation in order to par-
tiCIpate in this proceedmg,' you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provisipn of
certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Depart-
ment, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East. Bulldin~ W, Naples, Florida 34112,
(239)252-8380; Assisted listening devices for the heanng impaired are available in
the_ County Commissioners' Office.
,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED COYLE. CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E.8ROCK, CLERK
By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
ISEAL) .
lllnf' ~ )~'1
Nn190;;R71i
Packet Page -1941-
6/28/2011 Item 17.8,