Agenda 06/14/2011 Item #10F
.
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10,F.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve $29,729 in design alternative studies for the
Vanderbilt Beach park/restroom facility as directed at the March a, 2011 Bee
meeting.
OBJECTIVE: Obtain approval for expenditures for the design alternative studies for the
Vanderbilt Beach park/restroom facility as directed at the March 8, 2011 BCC meeting.
CONSIDERATIONS: On June 22,2010, the BCC approved a conceptual design (Item
10A) for a new facility to replace the existing Vanderbilt Beach bathrooms with an
elevated design conforming to FEMA flood requirements. On July 27,2010 (Item 16D9)
the BCC approved $160,000 for the design engineering, permitting and construction
contract bidding for the proposed Vanderbilt Beach park/restroom facility.
On March 8, 2011, the BCC directed staff to develop alternatives to constructing an
elevated restroom, deck and concession beach park facility at the current FEMA VE 14
location. Options requested were:
1. Renovate existing facility - Utilizing the appraisal and structural inspection of the
existing facility, develop a conceptual plan and evaluate the options to renovate
the existing facility.
2. Design a smaller flood proofed facility at grade in proposed AE zone - Develop
conceptual design and feasibility cost for a smaller bathroom facility at-grade that
does not include a concession stand or refreshment/seating area.. This facility
would be flood proofed for the new proposed AE zone. The location of this
facility would be built farther off the beach and not in the footprint of the existing
facility. These requirements would necessitate this facility to be built in a
preserve area.
3. Refurbish the existing bathroom and expand bathrooms in the garage as needed
for capacity - Evaluate if this is possible due to code restrictions and if possible,
determine how much the existing facility can be refurbished (task1) and develop
conceptual layout for bathrooms in the parking garage. Included would be a
walkway through the preserve.
4. Construct a new facility at grade in the existing bathroom footprint (VE14). - If
granted a Flood map variance by the BCC, what would a new facility conceptual
layout/cost be? This would include the demolition of the existing facility, design
and construction of new restrooms, ADA accessible ramp, steps and a reduced
deck with no concession.
5. Construct a new but smaller elevated facility - Develop a conceptual plan and
options to demolish the existing facility and construct a new elevated facility to
conform to VE 14 FEMA guidelines. This would include the restrooms, a smaller
deck with no concession and either an elevator or ADA access ramps.
6. Renovate existing facility for concession storage - In conjunction with a new
bathroom facility, develop a conceptual plan to renovate the existing bathroom
Packet Page -580-
.
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
for concession storage. This would include storage for chairs, umbrellas, shade
structures, etc. but exclude food and beverage items.
7. The Growth Management Division will also determine:
. The City of Naples history/circumstances surrounding FEMA flood
variances granted within the City.
· Determine if a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) is appropriate to qualify this
specific site to an AE zone based on actual site elevations provided by
Coastal Zone Management.
Staff will be required to review these options with the Pelican Bay Foundation. The
Pelican Bay Foundation holds restrictive covenants on this parcel as a condition of the
property deed transfer. These options will also be reviewed with the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board, the Coastal Advisory Committee and the Tourist
Development Council.
Cost to develop these design options are as follows:
1. Renovate existing facility -
2. New facility in proposed AE zone -
3. Refurbish existing bathroom and add bathrooms in garage-
4. Construct reduced facility at grade in VE zone -
5. Construct reduced elevated facility in VE zone -
6. Renovate existing bathroom for concession storage -
7. Client Coordination -
8. BCC Presentations -
9. Contingencies-
10. Reimbursable -
Total
$ 1,810
$ 7,169
$ 3,414
$ 3,729
$ 3,076
$ 980
$ 1,970
$ 3,885
$ 3,466
$ 230
$29,729
Overall project costs along with design throwaway costs for each option will be
presented with each item.
On April 25, 2011, the Tourist Development Council recommended that the only two
options be studied. These options are:
1. Design a smaller flood proofed facility at grade in the proposed AE zone as
detailed it item 2 above and;
2. Refurbish the existing bathroom and expand bathrooms in the garage as needed
for capacity. This would also include a structural analysis of the existing facility
to determine the amount of refurbishment that could take place. This is detailed
in item 3 above and includes a structural evaluation.
Cost to develop these design options are as follows:
1. New facility in proposed AE zone - $ 6,890
2. Refurbish existing bathroom and add bathrooms in garage- $ 4,019
Packet Page -581-
.
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
3. Client Coordination -
4. BCC Presentations -
5. Reimbursable-
$ 1,800
$ 1,995
$ 180
Total $14,884
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: At the April 14, 2011 Coastal
Advisory Committee meeting, the Committee voted 9-0 against recommending the
investigation of these options. The Committee's position is that the original design is
consistent with County policy and existing facilities. The Committee also indicated that
this project has been fully vetted and approved by the BCC and meets FEMA standards
for this location.
At the April 20, 2011 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meeting, the Board voted 5 to
1 against recommending the investigation of these options indicating that sufficient due
diligence had already been performed.
On April 25, 2011, the Tourist Development Council recommended unanimously not to
move forward with the options identified by the BCC on March 8, 2011. They
recommended 6-3 that only two studies as indicated above be investigated.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to develop options 1-7 as requested by the BCC on March
8, 2011 is $29,729. If only the two option recommended by the TDC are investigated,
the cost will be $14,884. All funds will be provided from Category "A" Tourist
Development Tax Fund 183 - Beach Park Facilities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management
Plan related to' this action. This study will identify specific impacts, if any each option
would present to the Growth Management Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Approve $29,729 in design alternative studies for the Vanderbilt
Beach park/restroom facility as directed at the March 8, 2011 BCC.
PREPARED BY: Gary McAlpin - Director, Coastal Zone Management
Packet Page -582-
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 10.F.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve $29,729 in design alternative studies for
the Vanderbilt Beach park/restroom facility as directed at the March 8, 2011 Bee meeting.
Meeting Date: 6/14/2011
Prepared By
Name: HambrightGaiI
Title: Accountant,Coastal Zone Management
6/6/2011 12:17:32 PM
Submitted by
Title: Accountant,Coastal Zone Management
Name: HambrightGaiI
6/6/2011 12:17:33 PM
Approved By
Name: McAlpinGary
Title: Director - Coastal Management Programs, Coastal Zon
Date: 6/6/2011 1:18:18 PM
Name: AlonsoHailey
Title: Administrative Assistant,Domestic Animal Services
Date: 6/7/2011 8:29:03 AM
Name: RamseyMarIa
Title: Administrator, Public Services
Date: 6/7/2011 9:37:47 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/7/2011 9:59:21 AM
. Name: KlatzkowJeff
Packet Page -583-
.
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/7/2011 4:02:51 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 6/7/2011 5:25:34 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/8/2011 8:16:41 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 6/8/2011 9:03:00 AM
Packet Page -584-
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
.
VANDERBILT BEACH BATHROOM EXPANSION
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE SITING LOCATIONS
EXISTING ALT. 1 ALT. 2
202' 222' 408'
N/A N/A 213'
. . ~ DISTANCE TO CCSL 16' (5) 78' (5) 87' (L)
'ji.~.f~.> *_wal~ing_~ist~nce measur~~.!r~m~e!e~~n~e p~i.r~~ to bat.hrooms
. '.~~V (S) denotes seaward (L) denotes landward
''''~''. \if;--
~""" Af'.
'~J
DISTANCE TO MHW*
DISTANCE TO EXISTING*
ALT. 3
710'
515'
280' (L)
.
.
""""
COWER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ENVIRONWENTAL TmI.:
PlANNI,. SElMeES VANDERBILT BEACH BATHROOM EXPANSION
PH~~ i~i~~::~~~ MASTER EXHIBIT
~[~~~:~'~~1:':::~,7f,~~::: ALTERNATIVE SITING LOCATIONS
"Ot0192 Bolhraom All lac-d.
IU.NO..
1D.19
Packet Page -585-
-..~
cJ.Eer Cou.nty
~ -... --...
-- - --
Growth Management Division
Planning & Regulation
Land Development Services
Memorandum
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
.
,
To: Wdliam D. Lorenz, P.E., Director
La~d Development Services
i
From: Ro~ert C. Wiley, P.E., CFM, Principal Project Manager
FEMA Floodplain and Watershed Planning Section
,
Date: 6-~-11
Subject: Ci, of Naples Variances
Su~nmary of Approved LOMRs Within the City of Naples
Co~tal Analysis Transect at the V. Beach Restroom Facility
i
City ofNapl~s Variances
I had a teleplione conversation with Christa Can'era, Floodplain Coordinator, for the City of Naples regarding the
information discussed by Commissioner Hiller for the Port Royal Club. Christa informed me that the City
approved a f~w variances, and she sent me the information for three (3) locations.
. 290q Gordon Drive (The Port Royal Beach Club) .
. 21011 Gulf Shore Blvd. N. (The Moorings of Naples POA)
. 40611 Gulf Shore Blvd. N. (park Shore Assoc.)
i
2900 Gordod Drive (The Port Roval Beach Club) - On May 20, 2009, the City of Naples Board of Appeals
approved a v~riance to allow the Beach Club to construct a men's and women's pool restroom, no more than 600
sq. ft. each, dn the ground floor below the base flood elevation of 12' NA VD should the existing building need to
be replaced idue to the occurrence of substantial damage. The variance approval states, "The proposed design
will move th~ Club landward away from the active beach and dune system and provide for use of the existing
elevations avoiding excavation and fill. The ground floor level will consist of parking, entry into the building and
pool restroo$s which will allow compliance with federal accessibility standards."
!
2101 GulfS~ore Blvd. N. (The Moorings of Naples POA) - On September 15, 2010, the City of Naples Board of
Appeals apptoved a variance to allow the Moorings of Naples POA to construct beach restrooms approximately
18" above ~e existing grade, which is below the required base flood elevation of 13' NA VD. The proposed
structure is rio more than 258 sq. ft. It will consist of one (1) men's restroom with a toilet and sink and one (1)
women's re~room with a toilet and sink. There will also be a small supply room. The variance also requires the
preparation 9fa flood response plan prior to the Certificate of Occupancy.
:
4061 Gulf Shore Blvd. N. (Park Shore Assoc.) - On June] 6,2010, the City of Naples Board of Appeals approved a
variance to ~llow the Park Shore Association to construct beach restrooms approximately] 8" above the existing
grade, whicI1 is below the required base flood elevation of 12' NA VD. The proposed structure is no more than 289
,
sq. ft. It wilJ consist of one (1) men's restroom with a toilet, urinal and sink and one (1) women's restroom with
two (2) toile~s and a sink. There will also be a small supply closet. The variance also requires the preparation of a
flood respo~se plan prior to the Certificate of Occupancy. Christa Carrera stated that this restroom facility was .
constructed with breakaway walls.
Packet Page -586-
.
.
.
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
Staff Comment on the City's Three Variances - Of the three variances for restroom construction within the VB
flood zone, the variance to the Port Royal Beach Club is a preemptive action in case a future substantial
damage situation impacts the facility and requires a reconstruction. The other two variances (Moorings of
Naples POA and Park Shore Assoc.) are both small restroom facilities with total area less than 300 square feet.
That small size is apparently a consideration in the variance based upon the provisions within the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that allow non-supporting breakaway walls for enclosed areas of less than 300
square feet within the VB zone without affecting the cost of flood insurance premiums. It appears that perhaps
the size was thought to be small enough to be of no significant impact for potential of obstruction. From the
NFIP perspective, it is the use of the structure, and not the size that is the issue for consideration.
When constructing within the VB flood zone, all areas below the base flood elevation (BFE) are required to be
ITee of obstruction. Below-BFE building elements are limited to access stairs and ramps, decks and patios,
elevators, enclosed areas, equipment, foundation bracing, grade beams, shear walls and slabs. To achieve this,
the structures are constructed on pilings, columns, piers, and sometimes shear walls. However the use of
breakaway walls for enclosed areas below the BFE is allowable provided the appropriate design criteria are
met. The NFIP requires that the use of the area below the BFE is limited to access, temporary storage and
parking. It appears that the City's issuance of the variance for the restrooms is not consistent with the NFIP
(see information from Technical Bulletin 5 below). Compliance with the NFIP is determined by FEMA, and
not County staff.
FEMA Technical Bulletin No.5 titled "Free of Obstruction Requirements for Buildings Located in Coastal
High Hazard Areas in Accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program", and dated August 2008,
contains the following section:
Restroom Buildings and Comfort Stations
One question that arises is whether restroom buildings or comfort stations can be treated differently
than other types of V zone structures and be constructed below the BFE, particularly when those
facilities are situated in public parks or recreation areas. The answer is no. These structures must
meet the same V zone design and construction requirements as other buildings.
Summary of Approved LOMRs Within the City of Naples
From FEMA's web site, approved LOMR's (Letter of Map Revision) were viewed for the FIRM panels that were
directly on the coastline.
Panel 379
LOMR Case No. 07-04-2297P - This LOMR was for Naples Cay at the end of Seagate Drive. The area of
revision also included the northern end of Seahorse Ave.
· The effort moved several buildings within Naples Cay out of a VB (Elev. 12 NA VD or Elev. 13
NA VD) zone into an AE (Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone. None ofthe.VB flood zones for the
buildings (10 and 20 Seagate Drive) near the back of the beach were changed.
· The effort moved four houses on Seahorse Ave. from the VE (Elev. 12 NA VD or Elev. 13 NA VD)
zone into an AE (Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone. Also, two houses were moved from the VB (Elev.
14 NA VD) zone into an AE (Elev. 13 NA VD) flood zone.
· In the Preliminary DFIRM, most of the buildings within Naples Cay are proposed to be located in
an AE (Elev. 11 NA VD or Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone. However, 81 Seagate Drive is proposed to
be entirely within the VB (Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone whereas on the LOMR it is within the AE
(Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone. This would have a detrimental effect on the building's flood
Packet Page -587-
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
insurance rating. Notably, 10 Seagate Drive is proposed to be located in an AE (Elev. 12 NA VD) .
flood zone instead of the current VE (Elev. 14 NA VD) flood zone.
_: In the Preliminary DFIRM, all of the houses on Seahorse Ave. are proposed to be in an AE (Elev.
i
] 0 NA VD or Elev. ] 1 NA VD) flood zone.
i
Panel 381
No approved LOMRs listed by FEMA
i
I
Panel 391
No a~proved LOMRs listed by FEMA
i
i
Panel 393
,
LOMR Case No. 09-04-6264P - This LOMR was for 144 lOth Ave. South located east of Gulf Shore Blvd.
S. ant! south of 1 Oth Ave. S. .
,
-i The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation from a VE (Elev. 12
! NA VD) to an AE (Elev. ] 2 NA VD).
, The AE flood zone line was jogged westward approximately 50'.
eI In the Preliminary DFIRM, these locations are proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 10 NA VD) flood
i
i zone.
I
Panel 58 ~
LOMR Case No. 07-04-6595P - This LOMR was for 270 Little Harbour Lane located east of Gordon
Driv~ and south of 21st Ave. South.
~ The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation from a VE (Elev. 12
i NA VD) to an AE (Elev. 11 NA VD). .
, The AE flood zone line was bulbed westward approximately 700'.
~ In the Preliminary DFIRM, this location is proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 8 NA VD) flood zone.
i
LONiR Case No. 08-04-4493P - This LOMR was for Sabre Cay, Lots 6 & 9 located east of Gordon Drive
and borth of Cutlass Lane.
I
, The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation for 9 Sabre Lane
I through 6 Sabre Lane from VE (Elev. 13 NA VD) to AE (Elev. 11 NA VD) and to change the 2005
. FIRM flood zone designation for 5 and 4 Sabre Lane fi'om VE (Elev. 12 NA VD) to AE (Elev. 11
i NA VD).
~ The AE flood zone line was bulbed westward approximately 600'.
it In the Preliminary DFIRM, 9 through 7 Sabre Lane are proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 10 NA VD)
flood zone while 6 through 4 Sabre Lane are proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 9 NA VD) flood zone.
!
LO~ Case No. 10-04-3471P - This LOMR was for 3260 and 3272 Green Dolphin Lane located east of
Goraon Drive at approximately the area of33rd Ave. South.
~ The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation from a VE (Elev. 12
I NA VD) to an AE (Elev. 11 NA VD).
~ The AE flood zone line was bulbed westward approximately 500'.
~ In the Preliminary DFIRM, these locations are proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 10 NA VD) flood
I
! zone.
i
I
LOMR Case No. ] 0-04-7972P - This LOMR was for 4111 Gordon Drive located at the southeast corner of
,
Goroon Drive and Cutlass Lane.
I- The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation from a VE (Elev. 12 .
! NA VD) to an AE (Elev. 12 NA VD).
i
I
I
i
I
i
I Packet Page -588-
!
,
i
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
.
· The AE flood zone line was drawn as an "island" within the VE (Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone,
somewhat along the parcel's north, east and south property lines..
· In the Preliminary DFIRM, this location is proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 10 NA VD and Elev. 11
NA VD) flood zones.
LOMR Case No. 1 0-04-84l5P - This LOMR was for 280 Aqua Court located east of Gordon Drive and
north of 21st Ave. South.
· The result of the LOMR was to change the 2005 FIRM flood zone designation from a VE (Elev. 12
NA VD) to an AE (Elev. 12 NA VD).
· The AE flood zone line was drawn as an "island" within the VE (Elev. 12 NA VD) flood zone,
along the parcel's property lines..
· In the Preliminary DFIRM, this location is proposed to be in the AE (Elev. 9 NA VD) flood zone.
Coastal Analysis Transect at the V. Beach Restroom Facility
Based upon a discussion that you and I had, it would not appear to be significantly beneficial to contract with
Tomasello Consulting Engineers to draw a coastal transect directly through the location of the existing restroom
facility and re-run the coastal storm analysis. The current coastal modeling for the Preliminary DFIRM has a
transect approximately 100' south of the restroom facility location, and there does not appear to be an significant
change in the coastline within that distance. The results from the additional transect would probably not be
significantly different than what is already shown. The existing ground elevations, along with the proximity to the
open water ofthe Gulf of Mexico, are not sufficient to reduce the incoming wave heights to less than three (3) feet
and remove the site from a VB flood zone designation, so there would be no value gained in applying for a Letter of
. Map Revision (LOMR).
Cc:
Summary of Approved LOMRs within the City of Naples (6-6-11).doc
.
Packet Page -589-
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
,
,
,
i
PROJECT ~AME:
I
I
i
V ANDERBIL T BEACH RESTROOM AL TERNATIVES ANALYSIS
OPTIONAL WORK ORDER
.
CEC PRO~ECT NO: 10.192
DATE OFfISSUANCE: May 6.2011
,
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 6. 2011
CLIENT: ci:ollier County
!
PROJECT :MANAGER: Michael Poff
Coastal ingineering Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is hereby directed to provide the following services in
connection! with the Vanderbilt Beach Restroom facility. This work assignment shall be conducted in accordance
with the rerms and conditions of our Continuing Contract for Professional Engineering Services for Coastal
Zone Maru/-gement Projects (CONTRACf) No. 09-5262.
,
SCOPE O;F SERVICES
i
The scopeiof services presented herein is designed to assist Collier County's Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Departmet# review alternatives in connection with the renovation and I or expansion of the Vanderbilt Beach
restroom fij.cility. ForTasks II and m. the evaluations for each option will include the following parameten;:
1.1 Environmental Impacts (e.g. T&E species, dune vegetation, wetlands, mangroves);
2.1 Rules and Regulations (e.g. FEMA, ADA, federaIlstate/local regulatory);
3. i Institutional (e.g., distance to MHW, specific uses);
4. i Construction Budget (site work, mitigation, design and pennitting, and construction management); and
5. i Timing (e.g. FEMA flood zone map revision, pennit processes).
The Task ~umben; listed below correspond to the Task numbers used in the original Worle Order.
i
Task II I Construct New Facilitv in Prooosed AE Zone
Develop l!j concept plan and evaluate the option to construct a new facility at grade in the proposed AE Zone as
depicted 9n the proposed FEMA flood zone map to be provided by CZM. The facility will include restrooms,
access raIPps / stairs, decks on the west and north sides, and storage areas for beach items like chairs, and
umbrellas! This is within the preserve area.
I
i
,
I
Task ill i Refurbish Existine Bathroom and Exoand Bathrooms in Garaee
Develop ~ concept plan and evaluate the option to refurbish the existing facility and add additional bathrooms in
the parkin'g garage. This plan will include an elevated boardwalk through the preserve area from the existing
facility to Ithe garage.
!
Task VIIi Client Coordination
Provide c~ent coordination including attending one meeting with County; provide contract administration.
.
,
Task VII~ BeC Presentation
CEC will iassist prepare and present the alternatives analysis to the BCC.
I
Task X I Reimbursable Exoenses
Provide budget for reimbursables.
I
,
,
It is antic~pated that upon selection of the preferred alternative, additional design and related services will be
necessaryl thus they are reserved for future phases. It is understood the County will address the FEMA-
LOMR s~rvices.
.
Packet Page -590-
< 6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
CECNo.1O.192
. May 6, 2011
Page 2 of2
BUDGET SUMMARY
Task Description Fee Basis
II Construct New Facility in Proposed AE Zone $5,695 T&M
III Refurbish Existing Bathroom & Expand Bathrooms in Garage $2,274 T&M
VII Client Coordination $840 T&M
VIII BCC Presentation $1,995 T&M
X Reimbursables $100 T&M
Total $10,828
RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:
By: By:
Michael T. Poff, P .E. Client (Autho~zed Signature)
Date: Date:
. I:\DATA\20 1 (J\l 0192\Work Orders\] 0192_0ptionaL Work Order _2011 0506.doc
,
.
Packet Page -591-
~ t~
rl,o~;~~w
== i
lti
~NI
~ JI '" ~ ~,
~ .~.. I~ '- ~4
~'-
D -".
~ 0 I ~ N ~ ~~ ~.. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~I
::-'~ --- ~"
~ ~. i"..
e'; .... I" ~ as ~ "" ~ 1-<0 ~ 1$l ~ u' ~ ~ ~ I::' ~ ' ;r ~
Co ~ v ...... C1I .p.. .p.............. ~ l~~ U1 -. C 0 - c S'
~ ~ 0 0> 0 ""'_ 0 Iii" 0 '" -I~ U1 '" ~ ".., .. .. -
~, I- E! ~. ~' !--r--
~ . ii .to. fa' I
!. ~",,;, ~ I~ ~, ~;~!
~ g ~~- ~ I~ ~ t~;~ ~ ~c
..;=E n ~ 0 .~; .".,: -!~
--.. .., 1.-1-1-' _, ill!: - .-ja
0.. . 0 ~ 0 ~" li'l~
~ii.i'.' 1i1."j ~ I.; ~i.';:.' ~~~' iiii
~:~ Ifil~ Ff;:~ ~. gl
"'.r ~. i""
~~~. ~rm1$l~:~~~I..~~~~
o......c.n-.-.I-w........... -......o~o~~~
domA 0 O~..... ~~-~ -0
~ 0.:. ~.: ,U1 - ~, ~ ...
.I~ ~ ~I ~~~ J ~~~
,.>e.~_._._.. , -..
_ -. en .,-;.o._.!!!....
: ~ i ~ i i.
~c;l"
&![~en"T1tll
6::I:xg.-S.n
"C 0 -. . - n
-<=:ZIn~
'""iil ~.O '""~
- .. a. ~ s.
~- - ::;-
~ iii <c
i., a
an
~, g
'a.
:r
~
0-
::l
I~
~
~
r;:
r~
I~.
""i.
f~
illi.
~
~
~;;
!r~
~~
~
r;~'
e:;.
a,~~
~ ~
8li i
",0>...
'" ~.
!
~
-,
~,
~
cb
'"
'"
~
cb
'"
'"
i ~ li
n en m 5"1~. en m 5" :ii
~" g. ~ ~- g. ~ ~ =;
~ 6;~ 6t;~~
CD g =:~ g ~~
~ ~gs ~go
c5~6fcn~ iifCl)~
Uli.::l _ ::l
i Q ~~ Q l~'
~o --0 .-~
o. I!:! ~ ~~' ~ ~~
'" -, ll> ~a.5.
g-~g- c:
$1;:.1:::;' == ",,::J =
~; .[ ~~
~. ;! ego:
~. g-I:m
~' ::ll~
Ii -I.~
i/.." ~
:i' ~
~. ~:
~~~ :;.;.
e'}- i
IJ<~
~~...
r~-
,:~
if.
~' ~~
-'~~~~~~I
,~.
-' NI_
", I~~.-.f.'
l~,' I'l'>
.- ~ ~ N[""
t!:': r'o
~
N~I~'
II ~
~ ~*
~.
O?"'"-;-
tit..
-. I\)r~
i'
~Nl
~
:~~
I~
i,
I1j
i
Packet Page -592-
;;;;'--1
"'ill>
""'-;;~
C
C1l
Ul
()
." rE:
0-
. ::l
'1
,.
j..:/
..
:~;:
t!J
~~
;.'
~
1\i~"'1
I~
,-
..1.;.
\{;t
Ji]
~ti
;i!
,~"
~
:1/
N~
...
.,.
-'.. "'1. ~
- "
CD 2.
'" '[
'" f-j--
~.. ."l~ ~
-'::::1 0
> . ..~ "iD
~ CD~!! !l
";" !
iW ~i l
~oi ~
!1'~ ! en
~<' ~!if ~
. ~fi ~
t!!. i""'....
~:
"..
\~.
!mt
~!~ ~
-.i) U1 ~~ g
I"
~
i
.,,1
enl
it Oi
". !
m
::s
CQ
C'l S'
!f CD
[ CD
::::!.
::s
CQ
(")
o
::s
o
c
::;
Sl.)
::s
-
o
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
~c(")::c~
~ ~ m~ :;
"'!!o(")ce.
O--n-CD
.... CD _. ID ...
....a.iDQ'g:
fgz<;:;
3~'tlm
3.....~m
1D~3n
... _ _. =r
'<co-
o",=::u
_ ~CD
m co ~
UI I>> a
=: &,0
~ :I> 3
- co I>>
CD CD::::l
a. ~e.
-n n C')
CD '<0
CD n ~
UI 0 n
3 CD
"CUI
_UI
iii'S'
::::l ::::l
n ..
CDO
:x:J"C
CD=:
,gO
c ::::l
-I>>
... -
~:E
- CD 0
~ ...
-~
UlO
...
Q.
CD
...
.
(")
o
Sl.)
o
-
~
i
.1
.
.
.
.
.-
.ilI.
-
-
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
Victor J. latavish Architect,PA
May 9;2011
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
Attn: Clint Perryman, Project Manager
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Proposal for Professional AlE Services for the
Vanderbilt Beac~ Restroom Alternative Design Studies
Dear Mr. Perryman,
I am pleased to submit this revised proposal for professional Architectural services to provide
alternative design studies for the Vanderbilt Beach Restroom. This proposal includes
preparation of preliminary building layouts and preliminary cross sections suitable for overlay
on aez:ial photographs and site plans prepared by the Civil Engineer, plus preparation of the
following documents and related work. Tasks are numbered to match the original proposal.
Task 2 AlE Zone Altemative- Preliminary Design. Study
1. Predesign Conference with Civil Engineer, FEMA, and Building Official
2. Prepare preliminary building plan
3. Prepare preliminary cross-section
Task 3 Refurbish Existing Beach Restroom and Expand Facilities at Parking Garage
1. Review building pwormit documents and plans of existing facility
2. On-site observations of existing structure
3. Structural Inspection and Renovation Feasibility Report
4. Review refurbishing plan, expansion plan, budget & permit considerations
S. Preliminary plan ofreStrooms added inside existing parking garage
Task 7 Meetings and Coordination
1. Review plans, permit considerations, and proposed budget with County staff
2. . Project Management and Administration
3. Coordinate preliminary plans with Civil Engineer
SCHEDULE
We are" prepared to provide services as needed to meet your schedule.
Member of the American Institute of Architects AA 1831
4100 Corporate Square, Suite 100, Naples, Florida 34104
Telephone 239.643.1665
TelcfBcsimilc 239.643.6192
Packet Page -593-
~.
i
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
page 2
EXCLUSIONS
1. Civil Engineering services are provided under a separate contract.
2. Additional meetings
3. This proposal does not include detailed floor plans, exterior elevations, or
renderings which can be developed for the selected alternative at a later date.
Similarly, Contract Documents used for permits, bidding, and construction can be
developed for the selected alteniative at a later date.
BASIC SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE:
.
2. AlE Zone Altemative- Preliminary Design Study
3. Refurbish Beach Restroom & Parking Garage Alternative
7. Meetings, Administration, & Project Coordination
8. Reimbursable Expenses
Total
T &M est. $1,195.00 b, ~ 11)
T&M est. 51,745.00 if O~
T &M est. 5960.00 I tOO
T&M est. 580.00 rqqS
~
53,980.00
J Ltt <"t
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal for Professional AlE Services.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or if additional informa.tion is needed.
Sincerely,
VICTOR J. LATA VISH ARCHITECT, P A
Victor J. Latavish, AlA
President -
- - [)f 2
Packet Page -594-
.
.
.
.
\5-8-11 VANDERBILT BEACH RESTROOM DESIGN STUDI~S
I
TASK 2 - AlE ZONE AL TERNATNE
PRINCIPAL SR AUTOCAD FIELD ADMIN CLERICAL TOTAL
ARCHITECT DRAFTER
HOURS 4 4 0 1 9
RATE $185.00 $100.00 $110.00 .$55.00
TOTAL $740.00 $400.00 $0.00 $55.00 $1 .195.00
TASK 3- REPORT, REFURBISH, PARKING GARAGEALTERNATNE
PRINCIPAL SR AUTOCAD FIELD ADMIN CLERICAL TOTAL
ARCHITECT DRAFTER
HOURS 4 4 4 3 15
RATE $185.00 $100.00 $110.00 $55.00
TOTAL $740.00 $400.00 $440.00 $165.00 $1,745.00
TASK 7 - MEETING & COORDINATION
PRINCIPAL SR AUTOCAD FIELD ADMIN CLERICAL TOTAL
ARCHITECT DRAFTER
HOURS 4 .0 4 8
RATE $185.00 $100.00 $110.00 $55.00
TOTAL $740.00 $0.00 $0.00 $220.00 $960.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
. .
BLUEPRINTS, COPIES, COURIER, UPS, POSTAGE
SHIPPING, PLOTTING MATERIALS - ESTIMATE $80.00
ITOTAL
$3,980.001
Packet Page -595-
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
~.,
.- .
.
I
I
i
PROJECT !fAME: VANDERBILT BEACH RESTROOM ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
I
CEC PROJECT NO: 10.192
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
i
I
DATE OF ISSUANCE: April!. 2011
EFFECT~DATE: April!. 2011
i
CLIENT: Collier County
PROJECT ~AGER: Michael Poff
,
,
j
Coastal E~neering Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is hereby directed to provide the following services in
connection ~th the Vanderbilt Beach Restroom facility. This work assignment shall be conducted in accordance
with the terms and conditions of our Continuing Contract for Professional Engineering Services for Coastal
Zone Managbment Projects (CONTRACf) No. 09-5262.
SCOPE OF [SERVICES
The scope or seIVices presented herein is designed to assist Collier County's Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Department teview alternatives in connection with the renovation and I or expansion of the Vanderbilt Beach
restroom facility. For Tasks I to VI below, the evaluations for each option will include the following paramete.ffi as
well as coorqination with CZM's architect:
1. ~nvironmental Impacts (e.g. T&Especies, dune vegetation, wetlands, mangroves);
2. :Rules and Regulations (e.g. FEMA, ADA, federaIlstatellocal regulatory);
3. ~stitutional (e.g., distance to MHW, specific uses);
4. !Construction Budget (site work, mitigation, design and permitting, and construction management); and
,
5. Timing (e.g. FEMA flood zone map revision, permit processes).
I
Task I Renovate Existine Facilitv
To be compl~ted by the County's Architect.
i
I
Task IT Construct New Facilitv in Pronosed AE Zone
Develop a cqncept plan and evaluate the option to construct a new facility at grade in the proposed AE Zone as
depicted on (he proposed FEMA flood zone map to be provided by CZM. The facility will include restrooms,
access ramp$ I stairs, decks on the west and north sides, and storage areas for beach items like chairs, and
umbrellas. 1fhis is within the preserve area
I
Task ill Refurbish Existine Bathroom and Exnand Bathrooms in Garai!e
Develop a ~oncept plan and evaluate the option to refurbish the existing facility (Task 1 option) and add
additional b~throoms in the parking garage. This plan will include an elevated boardwalk through the preserve
area from ~ existing facility to the garage.
i
Task IV Construct Reduced Facilitv at Grade in VE Zone
Develop a c~ncept plan and evaluate the option to demolish the existing facility and construct a new facility at
grade in the YE Zone. The facility will include restrooms, ADA access ramp, steps, and reduced deck
i
Task V Construct Reduced Elevated Facilitv in VE Zone
Develop a cQncept plan and evaluate the option to demolish the existing facility and construct a new elevated
facility in t~e VB Zone. The facility will include restrooms, ADA access ramps, stairs, and reduced deck
Investigate qe feasibility of using an elevator versus ramps for ADA access to the new facility.
!
Task VI Renovate Existini! Bathroom for Concession Storaee
In conjuncti6n with a new bathroom facility, develop a concept plan to renovate the existing bathroom for
concession s:torage. This would include storage for chairs, umbrellas, shade structures, etc. but would not
include food :and beverage items.
,
,
I
I
Packet Page -596-
.
.
.
r "
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
--
i"
,
CEC No. 10.192
Aprill,2011
Page 20f2
Task VII Client Coordination
Provide client coordination including attending two meetings with County; provide contract administration.
Task VIII BCC Presentation
CEC will assist prepare and present the alternatives analysis to the BCC.
Task IX Contin!!encies
Provide budget for contingencies to account for such things as an additional concept, an additional meeting or
revisions to concept plans.
Task X Reimbursable ExPenses
Provide budget for reimbursables.
It is anticipated that upon selection of the preferred alternative, additional design and related services will be
necessary thus they are reserved for future phases. It is understood the County will address the FEMA-
LOMR services and the County's AIchitect will complete the structural inspection of the existing structure.
BUDGET SUMMARY
Task Description Fee Basis
I Renovate Existing Facility $0 T&M
II Construct New Facility in Proposed AE Zone $5,659 T&M
ill Refurbish Existing Bathroom & Expand Bathrooms in Garage $2,274 T&M
IV Construct Reduced Facility at Grade in VE Zone ..$2;...789 T&M
V Construct Reduced Elevated Facility in VE Zone $2,136 T&M
VI Renovate Existing Bathroom for Concession Storage $610 T&M
VII Client Coordination $1,290 T&M
VIII BCC Presentation $2,405 T&M
IX Contingencies $2,616 T&M
X ReimbuI'Sables $150 T&M
Total $19,929
RECOMMENDED:
APPROVED:
By:
By:
Michael T. Poff, P.E.
Client (Authorized Signature)
Date: April 1. 2011
Date:
1:\DATA\20UN0192\Work OrdersVOl92_Work Order _201 J040J.doc
Packet Page -597-
"~<:
. -
I
.
....,
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
Victor J. latavish Architect, PA
April 2, 2011
!
! .
,
:
!
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
Attn: Clint Perrym~ Project Manager
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Re: Proposal for Professional AlE Services for
Vanderbilt Beach Restroom Alternative D
Dear Mr. Perryman,
I am pleased to submit this proposal for profes ional Architectural services to provide
alternative design studies for "the Vanderbilt B h Restroom. This proposal includes
preparation of preliminary building layouts and pre cross sections suitable for overlay
on aerial photographs and site plans pr<:,pared by Civil Engineer, plus preparation of the
following documents and related work:
.
1. Existing Restroom Facility- Structural Inspection and Renovation Feasibility Report
a. Review plans of existing facility I
b. "Review building permit documents 1
c. On-site observations of exiSting structure
d. Prepare a Structural Inspection and Renovation Feasibility Report
2. AlE Zone Altemative- Preliminary Design Study
a. Prepare preliminary building plan and preliminary cross-section
b. Review -plan, permit considerations, and proposed budget with County staff
3. Refurbish Existing Beaqh Restroom and Expand Facilities at Parking Garage
a. Preliminary plan of restrooms added to existing parking garage
b. Review refurbishing plan, expansion plan, pennitconsiderations, and proposed
budget with County staff
4. VE-Zone At-Grade Alternative
a. Prepare preliminary building plan and preliminary cross-section
b. "- Review plan, permit considerations, and proposed budget with County staff
5.
VB-Zone Elevated Structure Alternative
a. Prepare preliminary building plan and preliminary cross-section, including
ramps, stairs, and elevator design study
b. Review plan, permit considerations, and proposed budget with County staff
.
Member ofthc American Institute of .Architects AA 1831
4100 Corporate Square, Suite lOa, Naples. Florida 34104
Telephone 239.643.166S Packet Page -598-
Tclcfacsimile 239.643.6192
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
6.
.:.,
.
7.
Beach Storage Renovation Design .Study
a Review selective demolition requirements
b. Review plan, permit considerations, and proposed budget with County staff
Coordination
a. Predesign Conference with Civil Engineer, FEMA, and Building Official
b. Coordinate preliminary plans with Civil Engineer
8. Meetings
a. Attend 4 progress meetings andlor community meetings as requested by client
b. Attend 1 BCC meeting
9. Contingency
a. Prepare alternative plans or revisions
b. Related additional services
EXCLUSIONS
1. . Civil Engineering services are provided under a separate contract.
.
2. This proposal does not include detailed floor plans, exterior elevations, or renderings
which can be developed for the selected alternative at a later date. Similarly, Con1ract
Documents used for permits, bidding, and construction can be developed for the
selected alternative at a later date.
SCHEDULE
We are prepared to provide services as needed to meet your schedule.
BASIC SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE:
6/14/2011 Item 10.F.
..f'
Thank you for the opportunity to "Submit this Proposal for Professional AlE Services.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
VICTOR J. LATA VISH ARCIDTECT, P A
'~r_.t'
Victor J. Latavish, AIA
President
Packet ~~~ ::..699-J