The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 03/31/1981 R .--. ~ ... ,... Naples, rlorida, March 31, 1901 LET IT BE REMr.~AP.RED, thnt the ßOðr~ of County Commissioners In and for the County of Collier, and also actin~ as the governing board(s)oE such special districts as have been created according to law and havin~ conducted husiness herein, Met on this dllte at 9:00 1\.M. in Regular Session in nuilding "F" of the Courthouse Complex with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: .John 1\. Pistor VICE CHAIRMAN: Clifford Wenzel C.R. "Russ" Wimer Mary-Franccs Kruse David C. nrown J\LSO PRESE~TI \...ll1'iam J. Reagan, Clerk; 11lIrold L. Hall', Chief Coputy Clðrk/~lecnl Ott1ccrl nnrlono Cavldeon ðnd !llnor nklnner (11~~ :.- P.M~·t; Deputy.Clerks; C. William Norman, County Manageq Neil Dorril1, . -I Administrative Assistônt to the County Man~ger; Donald Pickworth, County Attorney; Anthony pires, ~ssistant County Attorney; Terry "irta, Community Development Administrator; ~ee Layne and Richard Hender1ong, Planners; Irving ßerzon, Utilities Manager; Clifford Rarksdale, Public WorkR J\dminlstr.,tor/County Enç¡lnoor; Thomas Hafnor, Puhlic ~lIfoty J\dmlnistrator; Douglas Greenfield, EMS Director; Wayne ;,camehorn, Building Director; David Davenport, Building Inspection Department, and Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett, Sheriff's Department. Page 1 MOK 060 PACE 407 , . i i.,:- "'~".. . , ," . I<:~ '~"''''''_'~''_''''--_''''''''''-'';''''..".p,___"",__,__",_""",,"""""".,.,.\, .,',.....~,_.,....'.'M,"'."'··...",.·h·.>_·''''''''...".._·,'''..''"...~'"_..,~.__,",.........."."''';,~..._,,,'".>O''"...,,_"'........_,,,...,,...,,.,,,.'.'c·.,,"·,,·"',·....... ....> . . . ( ¡ I,J '; ; .. 1,:', "\1it ;~ . I"" '}.;,J. .iI" .,~;-~ ;(.1ì ,',I .'.;.;'§ "~ j'l." '.' " ; , . . "lArch 31, 19n1 J\GF:NT')A - 'lI'I'nnVP,D ~11TTI ^T')IHTO"l~ . - I' 'Commissioner WenzQl moved, socon~ed by Commissioner Kruse ðnd carried 5/0, that the Agenda be approved with the following additions: 1. Considerntion of ndditionsl expenditures re the StAte Attorney's Office - added to Old Business. 1;.'/1... ...." 115 ~;~~~ 2. Considcrntion of increased ratas f.or lnbor relntions attorney - addeò to County Attorney's Report. ~l.f '-0\ " 3. Consiðer~tionof authorization for Chairman's execution of deed rc rark Shore property for security - added to County J\ttorney's Report ... ~. Rccommendation re insurance coverage for ambulances for the intcrim pcriod of April 1 throu~h 5, 19ß1 - added to Clerk's Report (Other>. MINUTES OF MI\f1CII 3~"'f) 10, 19n1 - M'I'nOVF.f) ^!=> PRESF;NTF:f) . . ,- - . , Commissioner to/enzcl moveò, scconòeò by Commissioner Rrown and carried unanimously, that the minutes of March 3 and lO, 1981 be approved as presented. PROCLAMATION DECL1\RINr. THE WEEK OF APf1IL 5-11, 19a1 AS "CHILD CARE WEEK" - "f)OPTf,O r R'~. Upon Chairman ristor's rcading the contents of ð proclamation proclaiming the week of April 5-11, 19R1 as "Child Care Week", Commis- sioner Wenzel movcd, seconded by Commissioncr Wlmer and carried unani- mously, that the proclamation be adopted. P/SlJe '- " 1,'" BOOK 060 PACE ill '~~j., " -'H~ l'S! , ;'I~ . , .. ,', "., , ,'J~. , ,". J . :~} \ " 'I , 'J;1~ ~~ " i l1.f~t~·' '.,t/ ·~\·r{ r'" , . ~ .' ---_.._'_._--_..""----._"...,.~._.,-..,,-~,,-~,._.>"-;;._.,-,""..,~, I' " " I . .i', : " .~ :." j . j :.ßJ -Î ··I:.~.;I r -'~ ).......... .....'1 'ft: .:;;' ,~~ 1}1 . '¡J ,<III¡ frt! '~ March 31, 1901 PETITION CP-80-??C, ,JACKf;ON nOUGIINlm, RF:PRP.!>F:NTIN~ "\ICII\Et. MICr.t.I 1\ND · nARRV N~1\VL!Nr., RF:QUr.STING 1\ CO~['II1F.IIF.NSIVE £'tAN L1\'"lD USE Er.E~ENT AMENDMENT FOI1 LOTS l-~, Rt.OCK "r.", UNIT 2, CONNOR'S VAWDF.RRILT RE1\CH F:;'TATP.S - f)8:-¡un . -. . ~·-1 - - 'f Legal notice h~ving been published in the Naples Daily News on February ~, 19n1 as evidenced hy 1\ffidavit of £'uhlicntion previously filed with the Clerk, puhlic he~ring was continued from 3/10/nl, to consider petition C.P-AO-??C filed by J~ckson Boughner representin~ Michael Miceli and Barry Neavling. The subject petition is a request ", " for a Comprehensive Plan land use element amen~ment from residential mcdium density (0 - G.22 units per gross acre) to residential medium to high density (~.22 - 30 units per gross acre) on Lots I through ~~ Block "G", Unit 2, Connor's Vanderbilt Reach Estates. . Planner Richard H~nderlong located the subject property on an overhead map and expounded on the v~rious land uses for the surrounding properties. Referring to the information within the F:x€cutive ~ummary, dated 3/l0/81, inclusive of the material in the agenda packet regarding the subject petition, he reported that the CCP^ unanimously recom~ended denial of the suhject petition based on the information within the . ~taff report dated l/?,h/Ol. He said that the staff reco~mended de~ial based on the fact that the .property's present land use serves to provide a buf.fer and transition between the existing single-family homes to the north and eâst and the commercial lands uses to the south; the present land use designation reflects the existin~ condition of a mixture of and single and multi-family residential units on the subject property; the proposed land use would result in additional traffic which would have a deleterious impact on the existing single-family Page 3 MOK 060 rAcE413 ....'. ". ~ ,;:;~{ ~.:'.J~ .' "'-IPit ~,¡ .' . " :~.-·.~·I -, ·f1' I J ~OOÇ 060 P^CE '4ft! M.,rch 11, 1901 character of the nei0hborhood; and, hoc<1uSC tho stðff fools that thero arc slIffici0.nt r,esidcntiôl m~òium to hi0h density l~nd U5es that ~rn ccntrally locntc~ along Vnnderbilt Rench Rand which Drc more compati~le and Gnti~fy tho nccris of thc puhlic. Mr. Jnckson L. Boughner, reprcsenting the pctitioners, referrG~ to n letter dated 1/~3/ql, from himself to the County Attorney, trnnsmit- tin~ vnriaus sworn affidavits, memorandums, and correspondcnce regard- ing the !1l1hject p0.tition, ( copy of which W.)!J (,ccepted by the Deputy Clerk and marknd as Rxhihit "A". Mr. Aou1hner said that the subject petition is for nix lots, of which the southcrn most two have nothing on them; the two northern lots contnn the Tipton Apartments, which connist of: ten units; ñnñ, there is a ñu~lcx on onc of the interior lots. He said that prior to 1973 this propcrty was zoned so that Ðpartments of: the nl7.e prop05cd could be placed on them; this WlIS tho time thôt the Tipton Apartments were constructed; this is also the time thi'1t Mr. ",Hcel i purc!1-H';c(1 his two lots. fie ;:¡dc1f)rl that \·/hcn there WñS a Comprehennive Plan chnn]c, these six lots werc put hack into the R~-lJ\ rieni~nation, thus, the Tipton Apartments bcc~mc n non-conforming use Ðnd thi~ land usn chnn0c prcvente~ ~r. ~icell froM constructing the same type of operation on the two lots that he hnd purchased. Mr. nou0hner rï.' Ie! th¿¡t those t\..o lots "but a commerci(ll are¿¡ /)nn, except (or one rlllplùx, i\re vncùnt. Mr. ßou1hncr 9nle! that Dr. Nono Spi\~ni\ w~s the Community Development ^dministrator in 1977 when the BCC nenled n similnr petition for the subject property ¿¡nn th~t scvernl thin0s hðVO chnnged since Mr. Spi\~na rùcommonåeå ~enial on that petition. Mr. Bouqhner PiHJ P. 4 - -:--, --- " . . ;;:., ¡ Mðrch 31, 1901 ,~ J said that although much of the area to the south and west of the subjoct l~nd is zoned commercinl, hecnuse of the ~pprovßl of variances grante~ by the ßCC, those lan~s are being developed into apartments. Mr. Boughner said thRt the petitioners are not intercsted in either a motel or a rental operation. They propose to construct lO units for .i ) " , " sale as single-family resiñencp. conñominiums on the vacant lots. Mr. Bou~hner said that because he considers this kind of public hearin~ as a "semi-judicial" process with the Bee acting in judgement of approval or denial of ~crtain petitions and, because he believes that the Board should consider only the facts before them and not base . their decisions on the volume of support or objection from the audience and, because the petitioner's prior petition was denied with no specific obj~ctions having hecn raised prior to the time of the puhlic hearing and with no evi~ence having been produced during that public hearing, he is submitting to the Board the aforemcntioned Exhibit "~" as proper evidcnce. Mr. Boughner outlined the contents of Exhibit "~", including the names of the various affiants; the contents of the respective affidavits; and, he offered to put Dr. Spagna, one of the affiants or either of the petitioners under oath to testify if the Board wished. lie concluded his presentation by saying th.1t it is his impres3ion that if the Board does not approve this petition and the pøtitioners are faced with not being able to use their land, this process may boarder on the "takin~" of the subject land without due process. In answer to Chairman ristor, County Attorney denied that such is the case and slIid that he SlIW no need to discuss this further. lie Page 5 BOOK 060 PACE 415 " i ßQOK 060 l'hCE 41.6 Ml\rch 31, 191'\1 (JlI~lJeste<l that the rlanninlJ ~t;:¡ff he allowed to nc1droGs the mattor. Rich;:¡rcl I1cn(lcrlonlJ stnterl th<lt the rcc:ord should reflect that the Plnnning Department h,:¡u ncver heen furnished with a copy of the subject "cvidence" (r:xhibit "~") by the petitioners Dnc! that lt wn!1 only throu~h tho courtesy of the County Attorney that his dep,:¡rtmont has become ncC']u.:1inted \vith tho ml'lterlal therein; further, the evidl)nce . . (Exhibit UA") contrndicts tho cti'lff report L: mllny ùreas th"t tire to be considered by the nonrd regnrding the slJbjùct petition. Mr. Ilenderlong s"id thi'lt E:<hihit "^U incluc1es a statement thë\t there lire lIpi'lrtmcnts to the south and to the west; the property to the south of. the subject property, nccordin~ to their dië\ryram, is completely vacant nnd is separate~ by tI ~n ft. wide wi'lterwny in one area and n 101") [to h'atcrw"y in nnothcr. He said th~t thc "evidence" fails to rccol)nize th~sc watcrwnys ns nl'lturôl harriers lind, thus, rei'lsons for cstnhlishin~ houndÐry lines betwecn zoning an~ land use. fie said thnt the ðffiònvit sworn to by Mr. f>pngnù sté\tes thClt there are over :;0 lI¡>nrtments to the south ûnd west, when, nctuùlly, thoro Are only 1n units (~ulf Winds) existinq lInd l5 adc1ition<ll units presently undcr cònstruction. (Ie said thi'lt units thùt arc referred to as ~partmcnts are, in fact, units constructed liS provisioné\l uses in conjunction with various busincsses; thnt the properties directly to the west ¡HC conrletc1y un<lcrwi'ltcr (Vômlcrhilt r.,1qoon). The proporty to the Célzt, g¿dc1 ~'r. !1cnderlonr¡, is continuin~ to develop into slnglc-f~mily us~s. ,~'r. rtnn<lcrlon') si'lid th,1t the "evidence" fðils to rccorynizc the IISO of ùll six lots or the direct reli'ltionship of what the proposed land Pl1ryo I) " '~~f ~ \ .. . . I·· "I \:." l:f~ .i.~~ ·'i(l,~ ....£.\ ,~ .~,\ ,'.>~ w', ,',t¡¡' ,~ ~ -"'" . t~, " ,~ .,~ . ~~ .~ '·1 :~~ :¡¡;:, j ..~~ March H, 19n1 use change would do in terms of impact if one considerß the six lots In total. lie slIid that it is conceivable that with only one vacant lot the developer could, by tearin~ clown tho existing dup1cx on tho other lot and then ðevelopin0 the combined Rix lots to their highest allowe~ density if the proposeñ land use anò zoning chan~e is approved, construct as many as ?O to ?~ ß~ùitionðl units on those nix lots. Mr. < lIenerlong said that the Plé1nnin~ Department c.1nnot rccommend "contract zoning" and this too hð5 not been recognized in the "evidence" submitted hy the ~etitioner. There was a brief. discussion regardin~ the existing 10 unit non-conforming use; the difference between permitted numbers of units with é1nn without kitchens; the fact that if the proposed rezone was approved the existing duplex woulcl also become a non-conforming use as well as the fact that lot 4 would not meet the minimum size require- ments for RT zoning use of ?n,noo sq. ft. Mr. Henderlong stated that the record should reflect that the dtaff obj~cts to contents of the "evidence" submitte0; to the mAnner in which it was suhmitted; and that thoy believe that it contains no new nor any additional information that sheds any significant imp~ct on the presented staff report. County Attorney Pickworth asked ~'r. lIenderlonl) if. he feels that the existing designation in the Comprehensive Plan is propcr for this par~icular parcel and if, in his opinion, the requcsted land use Amondment would be inconsistent with good lancl use planning practice? Mr. lIenderlong replied affirmatively. Commissioner \.,rimer as~:ed Mr. lIen(lcrlong to clarify his answer to Page 7 . ': '/:\1 .~ <~:~ MQK 000 PACE417 ,.' '.~:>' . , '~I·'~ .,~ .~. ,. " ····.:.I'·~·'·'.· " , . . " . i ---~ ....... " " ~OO!í 000 rhCE 418 '~ ~1.Hch 31, 19111 ,.." '.~ Mr. Pick\.lOrth's f.irst question ;,nd explëdn whether or not the existing zonln') reflects whl'lt is now on the lots, inclurJinq the npl'lrtmcnts Ðnd the duplex. Mr. lIenr1tHlong replied ðf.flrml'lUvely; howevor, ho lidded " thnt the intQn~ity of the apnrtmcnt huilr1in~ is inconsistent with the pre5ent L<1nd Une rliJn: this is 1I prohlcm ciHried ovcr f.rom the time when tl,e ~oninq wan ch~n~ed. Hc clnriEied that the non-conformonce of the npartment huilding was not resultant of the ar1option of the Lðnd Use Plnn; it Wl'IS rcsultnnt of the prior ra~onin1 to RM-l In lQ73. rl~nner Lee Layne nd~er1 thÐt in 197J the County reduced ~ensitles. 5he sðicJ thnt at th.,t tirn/') the zoning rlistricts \-HHe r-1Fl, MF? anr'l MF3 and, the ~cnslty of MFl Inn~s were rc~uced from 13 to 10 units pcr acre; thnt is when the c:dstinq ë1[)lHtnants hecé1ma non-conforminq. She added tlH1t \-,hen the County cerlucerl (lt~nsity further ¿¡nr1 the ~1f'l r11strict was aivan the n - G.?? units [)er acre c1esiqnation, then, the a~artments hecame even more non-conforminq. She stated that the non-conformity existed prior to both the ac1ontion of the 197~ ~oning Orr'linance and the adoption of thc lC)70 Conpr~hcnsive Land Use pl.:1n. ~r~ noughnor nsked that the recor~ reflect thnt when he transMitted t!1c cori~r1 of the "evidence" (r.xhihit "1\") to the County ~ttornay, he assumed thë1t they would he trnnRnitte~ to ~ll of the right pInceR. 4e requestor! thnt Dr. Spn')na be nllowed to answer the technical questions brouryht Eorth during the heDrinq ~nd called upon him to do 50. Dr. Sp~')na stated that he woul~ like to úxplôin why he feels that there is justification for chanqin0 the Comprehensive Plan now, \-,hcre¡¡s, he ml.:1Y not have felt thôt \oUlY four y(.!(\rs éI'JO. lie (\ò~resRed P"CJ e ß . ; :..! ..h f't ;., /-ft ,..,.,~,---<--.. ,.7_1_-._.' .._"_~_.~,,,..<>_.~,w~,_~_._... ............ -.I r-, ,. '11' ¡ l "1 , iJ;J ~~..;".. ,·If ..~. ¡!'It . ' ~'ar~h 31, l~ltl the qucstion of traffic congostion Ðnd said that this concern w~s valid four ycars ago and it is not at this time. He state~ that Vanderbilt Drive has been completely rcsurfaceð since that time Ðnd the anticipated traffic that will be gencr~teð with th~ proposed development of lO units would be 55 additional vehiclcs per day and he docs not consider this to hc a si!)nificnnt imp<lct. lie further stated that he disagrees with the prcmise that the petitioner's property will .... ,. serve as a buffer betwecn residential property anñ commercial property; there is one residence to the north that has existed since the GRC property was estahlished for this area and Dr. Spagna said that to say that the property to the west is underwater and environ~entally sensitive is misleañing; although it is all underwater it is under privatc ownership and could conceivably be develope~ if. the permits werc acquired. He said th~t perhaps a marina or a restuarðnt could be constructed there. Dr. spagna said that there are approximately fiO reside:1tié1l units in this area even if they are not located immediately adjacent or ahuttin~ the subject property; that the general trend has not been, nor does he foresee it beconing, sllch that there is a need for all of the GRC property to continue to bc used as such in this general area. lie said that a permit hé1S been drawn for 15 units in the Vanderbilt Hideaway, and that south of the eastcrly waterway thcre lire l2 uni ts proposed. "'hen asked ny Commissioner pi stor why he is discussing GRc zoning Dr. Spagna said that he forsees the trend towards development of GRC lands into residential uses and, if this is true, those surrounding lIses will be compatible with the requested land use amendment. Dr. Spagna said that anothcr considcration is that the pag 0 9 MOK 060 PACE 419 .., .'" :~ .' .... T: :..~.~ ;'~I~~ '.'.:~ -.' -~ ..~ _.ç''''''1 . , i --.....---.. BOO~ 000 rACE 420 Mnrch 31, 19A1 , . ßOilrd has npproved ~ provinional US0S in tho qeneral nrcn; throo of " I thom since the petitioner's fir!!t rcquest W;'IS dcnie<'l in 197". lie sl'Iic1 ,. " i~ \ . that the rcs idontinl uses fit into the trend very ,,,ell, and he concluded thllt the lIMenñment to tho COMprehensive ['Inn to permit the multiple resiñentilll uses on the property on the west siñe of Vanderbilt Drive will not affect the Comprehcnsive Plbn ndversly; it will, in his opinion, inhanc!:! it. III'! offered liS proof. of this assumption, thnt there hllve be on three now homos ñeveloped within the l~st /.-) yeùrs imme~intely ~cross the street fr.om the Tipton ~prllrtment5. ~r. ~paqna, nnked the ROllrd to he rAsonnhle in their consideration of the probnhility of tenrin~ down the Tipton Apùrtments; Mr. Miceli owns lots 1 throuqh ~ nnd hc (~r. Spn~nn) is not aware of ùny pl~ns to tenr down the duplex or of devAloping the vacnnt lot to the north of his. Mr. Sp~qna sai~ thùt he foels thnt therc is justification for chnnging his recommendation of 1977 (n~ ho urged the Board to consiòcr the ch"nqcri that he helG descrihed, and to consiòcr a fiworahlc Clction on the suhject petition. Thcre WlIS n discussion regaròing the lIllowed uses of GRC lanò nnd, in nnswór to Commiosioncr ~imcr, Dr. Spagnn said that nnc land can be developed as a rcsiñentiDI use without DCC lIpprovnl. Planner Lee Layne disll0reed and slIid that the only residential usc allowed on GRC land is in conjunction with a business, and then, only with ~cc arprovlll. The following people spoke in opposition to tho slIhjcct petition: 1. Gcor'Jp. I:eller, Collior County Civic A¡:;::;oc. FcrJeration, 2. Glcn 'rucker, VlIndC!rbilt !Joc,ch Property Owner!! Association , . P"<JC 10 ... . , . . . '.... .' ~ ;...;~~ ?ff- . :'·t' .,.~ ,~~ IIi .. ", ~:~N ..~ "!~- )~ I, . , .., -- . 'r . .~': -í, .~; ~ 1 ' ..;< # .. ~ Mòrch 31, 1':)(\1 Mr. Boughner transmitted an advertizcment from the Naples Daily News dated March l~, l~Ol aß ndditionnl evidence, same boing accopted by the Doputy Clerk and markcd as ~xhihit "A". He clllimod that this advcrtisement establishes the f.act thnt thc proposed use of the surrounding Gnc lands are for residential purposes. He ~eRd the contents thercof and noted the words "ll~ intrDvôl ownership condo ..'t,; .'~J ~~.~ c~ "(," ';) apts." as proof of intendcd use. lie further snid that the property , .. advertised is owned by "Ir. Tucker's brother and is located just west of the subject property. Mr. BOl1<Jhner objecter'! to Mr. Tucker clÐiming, that if Mr. Micell i builds lO units on his property the value of the surroundin<J land will drop. Mr. Boughner said that if ~r. Tucker's brother develops ll~ units, he (Mr. Tucker) would probRbly claim that the property value would not drop~ He claimed that this is not fair a~d if tho one owner could develop so many units, then, the petiioner should bo allowed to develop ten. commissioner \~enzel moved and Commissioner ~ruso seconded a motion to close the public hearing. Referring to the advertisement (Rxhibit "B"), Commissioner Wimer said that he understands that it is truc that intraval ownership condominiums constructcd on that advertised property as well as boat docks built out into tho bay. lie said that ho believes that if. tho subject petition is denied the noard should go hack and take anothcr look at what it approvcd for the property referred to in tho advertisemcnt which is located just north of the subject property. Commissioner ~istor said that he has already asked the staff. to considcr makIng intraval ownerships and motels provisional uses so that Page 11 " aOOK 060 PACE 42f .. '. :.'9' . .~.... :' ,H ...,.!.,.,. . .J',~ ." . '-"',~ '. .,',........ ,"'t""~:'_' .~....-:---... i .. . ". 1_- I ---.-____..."''''.~'''.'''...,'''____.'''''''"'......__"..._'''_.',."''''''___...,','''"_.''''''''...,,,,.,"",.............,_..,_.._... · ~ f .,: " ~ I ~oox 060 PACE422 ¡'1IHCh 3l, 19111 County will hðvo morc control over them. no said thnt ho helieves tho staff is lookin0 into this nod will be hrin1ing it before the Board in ð short time for their consideration. Upon call for the question the motion to close tho public hearing carried un~nimously. CommisGioner Wenzel move~, scconrlerl by CommisGioner Kruse and carried 3/2, with CommissionerR ßrown ~nñ wimcr oPPo:Jod, to accept the staff recommend~tion and ñcny petition r.p-no-??c. RF.SOLIJTIO'·' r¡1-~4 VAC1\TINr. DI11\IN1\Gr:; fiND UTILITY ElI,;,F:~lI~N'rS RET'..mF.N LOT!; 2 r., 1, LOTS ) " II, MIl") LOTe; II r, 5, RLnC'< rn, r,OLOí-:N r,1I,1'F. UNIT 1 - 1\f)OPTF.D .. _ f' Legal notice having heen publinhed in the N~ples D~ily News on ~ðrch 15 and ??, 1981 as cvldcnce~ by 1\ffid~vit of Public~tion filed with the Clerk, puhlic hearing was opened to consider a petition filed by ~r. lIenry ,1. ;,ulliv~n for the ~oprovlll of. the vl1cation of the drainage nnd utility enscments hetween tots ? ~nrl 3; hetween Lots 3 and "; ðnd hetwe011 Lots I ,1nc! 5, ßlock rl1, Golde," r.<1te !Jnit 3, <1S recorded in Plat ,Rook 5, page lOll of the Puhlic nccords of Collier County. Public "Iarkn 1\,1mini!Jtr,')tor r.lifForr] nnrknòI11c sai,1 that the Letters of No Objection havf.! been nuhr'1itte,1 hy the utility compnnies; that the r.ngineering Depnrtment has reviewed tho petition and has determined that the vacntion will have no adverse affect on the area; and, that the W~1\ß has rcvlewed an~ ~prrovnd this vacation petition administrativoly. COMmissioner 1'11mer mover!, neconr1e,l by Comnlsslonnr Krusc nnd pa<Je l2 "'..,.-..----.-.--. ..........oJ ......, ~ . , ,j . . .,..,. '/ March :11, 191\1 carried unanimously, that the puhlic hearing he closed. Commissioner Wimcr moved, seconded by Commissiioner Kruse ^nd cðrried un~nimously, that Resolution Al-04 vacating the ^forementloned casements be ßdoptcd. ~i:' ,.: . ~ . . ;,~ , \;~ &OOK 060 PACE423 Page l3 , ' ., .' "...,.. .. -, '-'.. ~-'~.. ~ , ·\~~,'·oto:'·'~~'~1~'_~·':--·''''·f/..·,·~ '. ;'.~"" .......... . , .. " ~:\'·;···T"... i " .~. k""...o"..~",..."",.....,·..,",._"_,~,,,,,,,,^,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,",_,__,,,_,"~,,,·¡'¡¡~~;"'"'·";."'·"""f'" '·;"F'·¡_"~~'_'~_'''~';'''''''''''''''''';''''".'_'''."''''''''''''''''''''''''''''~",_.~".",."""""',",,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,_<_;, ,;~,,,__...,"._,.,.".", . .......~--_.- ..,."., . . " . . . i (. ~. ' ¡ . . . " -" ! .. I . March 31, 1901 RF:SOLIJTION 81-85, RF: PF:TITI0N CCCr.-I'Il-lC, 110LE, MONTF.fi t. ^S~OC. REPRE- SENTING ROßERT YA8GF:R, RF.QUF.~TING 1\ cCCL VI\RII\NCF: POR LOT Sl, ~LOCK "1\", tJNIT 1, VANor.n.n'tL'I' nr.I\CII F:5TI\Tr.f> - 7\,f)OPTP.O . Legal notico having heen published in the Nðples D~ily News on Mðrch 15, 1981 as evidenced by AffidÐvit of publication filed with the Clerk, public hcaring was opcncd to consider petition CCCL-Ol-lC, filed by 110le, Motes êlnd 1\ssoc. reprcsenting Robert Yaeger, request in') a Coastal Construction Control Linc variance f.or Lot ~1, Alock "A", Unit I, Vanderbilt Beach Estates for the purpo~e of constructing a condominium and swimming pool. Environmentul Consultant Jay Harmic descrihed the location of the subject property, and it's proposed situation between an existing' building nnd the ßarcelonð Condominium prosently unnor construction. lIe reforred to ~ drawing and outlined the establised construction line based on n straight line from corner to corner of cach of the two permittcd buildin1s adjacent to the subject site, and said that the v'ariance to the northern end is é1pproximately 70 feet from the establised cCCL and approximé1tely 90 feet seDwßrd ~t the southern end which will include the swirnminC) pool. 1Ie lIlso indicDted the meAn high water line and the vegetation line in relation to the proposed construction on the drðwing. Dr. l1arlTlic stated that because the requsted variance does comply with the criteria of the CCCL Ordinance the staff rccommends approval with the stipulations outlined in the resolution that has been prepared. There was a lcngthy discussion period regarding the proposed construction; the relationship of the proposed project to the CCCL; the method of determining the established construction line; the fact that Pðg e 14 MOK 060 PACE 42S .. ..,. . :,~"'r·' .. ...~'. .... . ~ iii. ._. t··1 . ,---'~" J ßOO~ 080 rACE 42,6 " ".'i; ',:': 1~ ;'r;~ ,~ ,,-I ......:¡.;j "?' "~ "'nrch 31, 19!\1 tho petitioner in not propo~inry to construct ð Dc~wnll; nn~ the prohlems associAted with construction in close proximity to the ~ulf in the event of ^ sevcre storm. 1\lso rllscus3ed wan whethcr or not the :~i<-i ,} ",; ¡~:~ Ú '.,('J ~ Board should continue to ûllow construction closc to the wnter's cdg~, hccnuso others h~vc beon nllowcñ to do so in the past, during which Dr. Itûrmic sûid that the relcvl'mt Ordinance jU3tif.icJls the Roûrd grllntinl) the v{r!ance based on the fact thôt the petitioncr Is rcquesting a vûriûnce out to a pQint ûlrcady established by previously IJr{nted vnriancC5 and/or construction prior to the û~ontion of the CCCL Orlñnf.1ncc. lie i.1drlerl that the criteri,1 Idthin the County orõinance is t:,c only method by I-Ihich hc is sUnp05c(1 to mnke his detcrmination. "'r. r.corr¡e ':eller, rf'!prc!'!f!ntinr¡ the Collier County Civic ^ssoc. Fedorûtion, sroke in orponition to the RuhjACt petition, claiming thðt he opposed qrantinr¡ { v{rtùnce f.or the financiñl benefit of f.1 rleveloper who knolvin')ly [Jurc:h,1ses property t:'ùt it not suitrlhlc for cert.nin development ùnri thcn purslles the ûvcnllCS of'varil1ncc!'! in order to make ð profit from thilt invQ!'!tment. !"Jr. fJi:Hrnic 5ti'ltnd that the ~tlltc CCCL ')OC5 throu1h the mid-point of the subject property. Com~issioncr . Pistor explained thût the Ordinûnce Dllowo (or construction beyond the C:CL, if certain criteriû is mot, upon the diocretion of the ACC; it docs not prohIbit it. />ir.. Cé1rl Gil7.o·,~, rerreßenting thr"! V.1ndcrbilt nel1ch Property Ownnr's Accoc., aroke in oproßition to the subjnct petition, Ðnd to ußin0 the point conßtruction of tho Vûn~erbilt ße~ch Cluh as ^ bnsis for detcrmining the estl1blißhc~ construction line in violðtion to the cccr. bCC,1l1SC th,1t bllilc1inq Wi15 constructe(l h~Core th~ tho Stnto I'lIge 1 ~ ¡'!'to 1: I,,;~~ . ~\ " \~.¡J :"1" J'- ~...t' . l, '(t' I . "''''''''"'''~''~'"'''''''''''--''' Uj\f 5}~· !!" ~ff1 9..1~ '.1 .'~~ " ~ \. { ~m·"-:';·~'''_·~- :-". - ·""3.... .·f·" '_ '?~, .t>: . I " "J .~ MlIrch 31, 19t11 established tho CCCL. Upon henrin~ objectiono from Mr. Cilzow regarding the relev~nt ordinancc Commißsioner Wimor stðtod thnt ho considers this is a good law; it reco~nizes platted properties ßnd it recognizes prcviously constructcd structures. Dr. Harmic addcd that both tho County ðnd the State CCCL l~ws provido ð method of. setting standards for de~elopmcnt; they do not prohihit development. Mrs. Chßrlotte Westmnn, representing the LCll~ue of Womcn Voters, spoke in opposition to the subject petition, stating that her objections address the environmental aspccts of the project and that she sees no nced to approvc such an extcnsive variance. Recalling Mr. Keller's stntement Commissioner Wimer stated that someone profiting or not prof.iting from an investment is not the concern of the Board; what is their conccrn is that this particular proposed proje~t relative to the subject ordinance ~nd the various setback rcqui rcments of: the County. lIc added that lnnd use plllnning has no recognition of ownership. He snid that he is concerned that this particular piece of property may be deemed "unbuildable" by virtue of a combination of County and State enforced setback lines. Dr. I-lalter Wild requested to spea.; in order to point out a gcometric error in the staff's determination of where the established line of construction lics. l1e said that the line shoulrJ be rlrnwn from mid-point to mid-point of each of the two adjoining buildings that encroach on the cCCL and not be drawn from the closest point to the furthercst point liS in the case of the drawing before thc Board for consideration. lie s,dd thðt if his recommendation wcrc incorpor"ted in tho drawing of tho line the onvironment would bo given more room. Page 1" BOOK 060 rACE 4Z7 '. ; tit" ~.,~t,'" .;.. ¡ _'.';-.', ~,:_;.. .. ;-¡;. .. :'« . -:'.,', . .. ~- J;r".... ~II]"-' I.'... ....: ~ r. ".." II:' .'.... . I!~ ... m 11 a! i~ 1 BOOX 06 0 rACE ·428 "'1i'1rch 31, 19!1l Mr. !'>tðrilny 110le, of l1ole, Montes anrl I\!'H.locil\t<!(J, IIcI(1reos<!cI the mannor in which the p.stûhli~heò line of construction Is ~rðwn i'lnd naid that same line is drðwn from the nenrest point of any structuro that encroachcs the CCr.L to the nCi'lrest such point of the other structure; the Stðte requircs that thase points in~rlnge on the CCCL. He further ~dòressed the CCcL and 5ai~ that, ns the nøme implic~, this is ð control line; it is not ñ setback line. lie also sðld that the State an~ the County rcco1nizn that construction may take plðce heyond the CCCL, however, you may not ~o so without the proper permits which include ~prroval hy the R~C, and Ð State permit as well; the State will not process a permit aprlicntion without the local love] being decided first; therefore, the petitioner is requesting to Roðrcl to consider this matter ðt this timc. !1e sniò thtlt evcn with the ßcC's approval, if the Stntc permit is not fort~comin0, there will be no constructio. fie said that he consièers this petition to htlvc met the criteria of the pertinent nr~¡nnnce and, th~rorore, re~uests the nonr~ approYi'll. Con~issioncr Wenzel moved, sccon~ed by Commissioner Wimer and cûrrinrl un,1nlmol113ly, thnt the public he"ring he closed. Cdmmissioncr wimcr movc~, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and cnrrie(! 3/7., with I':ommissioners Pi~tor ann 1,'cnzcl opposed, that the staff rccommendAtion he followed ñnd thnt Resolution "1-95 granting the requcßtcd vAri~nc0 rc Petition CCCL-nl-lC he adortcd. Pc"HJC 17 """'-...---- In~ "'W ' I}~ Id1 ~..14 .~ ., :¡ .~ ..,. ." .. J~ .. Max 060 PACE 432 Mélrch ll, lC)!'Jl '. punr.IC IIEARtNG CLO!:iP,D rm CONStnr-;RATtON OP Tllr, FHJrr.T)I~G cOOP. ORf)IN"NCr. AOO[,TP~G Tllf. 197') !iTJ\~DMm I1UILDfNr, crmr. \'1'fTI1 HRO RP'I/I!HON~ MJrJ COLLtER COUNTY DUtLDING INSpr.CTtO~ Df.p"nTMf.NT AMEND~r.NTS1 DECI~ION ne l'I)OPTt()~' Of' onntN¡\"'Cr. Cf"I"I'1't'J!r.rJ 't'f) "1?1('~ 1 Legnl notice hnvln~ been puhllshed In the Naples Daily News on February ?-7, ann Mnrch ~, 13, nnñ ?-O, 19A1 .'IS evIòenced by ^ffidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, puhlic hearing was opened to consider the aùoption of an orc1inélnce anoptinq the lq79 Standard nuilñinq Code with 19Bn revi~;ions (1n(] the Builc]in'] Inspor:tion Dnpùrtmont lImcndmenta. Community Development ^~miniAtrntor Terry Virtél snid thnt after review of the proposed nrdinnnce ndoptin1 the Building Code, there was an errata sheet prepnrod ~nd transmltten to the the members of the ßoùrc1. Jlc s¡:dd th,1t S¡¡l1e sheet cont,1ins vi'lrious arf!i)S of refinement (In(l 5u,]0e3ted ch.1ncjc;, to the suhject ordlnnnce. lie ,1skp.(1 that these amennments he considered today as part of tho recommended action hy the Bonrd. lie also sn(l t'lat, i.1drlitionally, within the title, there is an Indicl1tion that the suhject proposed orrJinnnce \.¡i 1 1 repeal Ordinance 70-15. lIe said that this is to he del e t e (1, ('~ thflt is the County's "tie-down" o r(] i ni) nce nnd is not in ne(!d of repol'll. lie silid thL'lt he would a¡so like to h~vo Ordinance 75-2R An'] Oròinñnce 7n-7?- addod to the list of ordinances to he rcpeal~d by th~ subject proposed ordinance upon its adoption; onc reEcr3 to perm~ncnt co's, whicl! is addressed in the StanñL'lrd Codc; the other is the or~inance ilñopting the 1977 and 1978 amendments to the lq7~ Coñc which will he renundl'lnt if the proposcd ordinnncc is adopted. The effort of the m~ny individuals responsible for the development of the recommended code was noted by Mr. Virta who concluded thAt he Page lO -' ._'-'----~:.....;:&y . '~...'! ~, ':r'tl ( ", ',,, '. ,I" , , f" ,'( , , ' ".' . '. ! ..¡ .............i'Ur. . . . .. ' ., . -. ........._.-~ March 3l, 19rn . believes that the subject coðe will bring Collier County "on llno with what is tho stnte of tho Drt", from D Gtðn~Drd codo porRpectlve. The following porson3 spoke in fnvor of tho ndoption of tho subject ordlnnnce: a. Bill Jones, rcpresenting the Contractors' Assn. of Collier County. b. John ~cschl, representing the FivQ County ßuildin~ Trados Counci l. , Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and ~ carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. .~. I Commissioner Wimer moved to accept the staff recommend~tion and ~, . adopt the Ordinancc that adopts the 1979 Standarõ Building Code with t'\ 19ßD revisions and the Building Inspection Department amendments, subject to the changes outlined in the aforementioned errata sheet and the three ~dditional changes outline~ by Mr. Virta. t County Attorney Pickworch stated that it has ju~t been brought to his attention that there is a need to continue this mattcr for an additional three weeks because there is an old Special Act still on the books which outlines additional time rcquirements that must be met regardin~ the publication of the adoption of such· an ordinnncc. After a brief discussion, Chairman Pistor noted that the motion on the floor for adoption died for lack of a second, and Commissioner Wimer move~ to continue the action on this matter to ^pril 7.1, 19n1. Commissioner Wenzel seconded the motion which carried unanimously. ****·*************R~C~SR 10:30 A.M. to 10:35 A.M..*******.*.**...... pnq e 19 " ~CDX 060 rA~ 433 \ ,,71 .... ,. ........ it-.. COOlt 060 PACE 434 M.1rch 11, lC)nl ß(JIr.nH~(j INSPECTION DEPl\nT'~p.NT AUTnOI1I7.F.O TO DIWr.LOP l\ F'InE PLl\NS m:vtr.w SECTIO'J; s'rl\F'F' ntnf:CTr.n 1'0 I~~~I¡:;T)tl\"'¡:;L'l P.F.C':IN NI~(jOTII\TIO"'S (HTH Ftnr. ntSTRt~TS nr. nnl\F'TtN~ T!IF: Nr.~r.ss~nY INT¡:;I1LOr~L ~~n~r.M¡:;NT~ nr. ~^~¡:; . ~ :J Comr:1Unity Devolop;ncnt Ac!minl!1trlltor Terry Virtël referrcd to tho memori1ndum, d.,teò 3/31/111, from himfielf to the ncc rCC)Drdin<:] ð Plro PIDns Reviewer in Collier rounty. Upon rending the cont~nts thereof, he stëlt~ò thnt the Committee'n rocommendntio:" in that the "oard direct the nuil~in~ In"pection Deri1rtment to dovelop ô Fire Pli1ns Review Section and further direct nt.,ff to immediately hegin ne10tiations with the fitnff of the fire districts to òr~ft the necessary Intnrlocal l\greements. lie concluded his prcsenti1tlon by "Dying thilt nlthouc:¡h it Wi1S throtHJh the efforts of r.1Dny inrlivlrlùls, <lcpùrtments, i'lgencles etc. thnt theG8 finDl conslusions were arriveò upon, the efforts of ~r. Don RDrhcr deserves spccial recognition for the lCùdcrshlr he "howed as Chairmnn of the Pire rl¿¡nfi nevi'!\" Function Ar1 Ttoc Committp.o. Mr. Don ßnrher npoke in favor of the recommendeò flction, i'lòding thùt the meetings were successEul; that the imput fron the contractors, the nt.:lff., c1n'Ì ',1riolls (ire persor,ncl ...,i1S all considered c1nr1 wC!Ï<Jhec1 cðref.ully: i1nd th~t, ultimñtely, evoryone rCðchcd ~qrcement on those con~lu!Jions indicated \,'¡thin ~lr. Virtc'\'s memorùnrlum. lie r,aid thélt the co:n;nitte~ I:lemhers i:\lso raised the follovlin:; points o'Jnd it \UIS fclt thnt they nhould he brou1ht to the ßoards ñttention for conr,idcration ~s (0110\"5 : ,1. l\uthority: It w"s reporter] hy the COllnty lIttorney sevp.ri\l wecks c1QO that the ultimate responsihility to fice thélt new conBtru~tion meets the fire corle ;In~l thnt the County nlso hrts the ùuthority to see that these huildinqs arc infipectod. The fire rlennrtmcnts nre rcquestinq the authority to cnforce the Page 20 " . , ':~. i~; 'I;J~; .:l, ".'~... .. .... ,~. i.), . .. ;~¡ " >¢ '. "'_111'1 ~ If) b. ~~t "';I ~t : ~) Ii.. ',;}. " .\¡ Îff1 j~, " J, i., i . t. . .; .. '" March :!l, 1901 County's ßuildinq Co~e, spccific~lly, the Fire Prevention CO~Q, os "enforcomcnt officcrs". Thin issue will he coming before the noar~ along with the f.inality of ^ fire code. It in nn issue thnt the Committee hns no pnrticulnr recoMmondn- tion on; however, it is the conn ens us of. tho Committoe thnt tho nonr~ give this thorou1h nnd continuo~ conBi~orntion. Inspections: Currently, the Auilding Inspection Dcpðrtncnt is well un~or5taffed in terM9 of. inspections for FIre Codes. The nuil~lnq Dep~rtment proh~hly docs not h~ve the expertise at this time to mako In~pcction5 for the fire code; the fire departments nre offering their services for inspections. Mr. n~rber said that he assumes that tho deci~ion regarding which inspections shall be carried out and to what degroe those inspections will be clonc as \"ell as the charges for the fire code inspections 15 goln~ to be a nuildin~ Dep~rtnent policy ~nd, perhaps, therein lies the entire decision reqarding the amount of involvement the fire departments will have in this function. This point Is recognized as an "unclear factor": the fire rJepnrtments want to cé1rry out the inspections;. they have to carry out a certain amount of inspections on ~~hAlf of the Firo Marshal nnywaYi they could serve a dual purpose and be helpful, especii1l1y in aspects rC<Jardin'J the final ins~ection. The é1rea huilders and contractors have <Jone on record many times th~t they feel that because the firemen ~rc the ones involved in the huildings in the event of a fire, they need to be fðmilar with the loc~tion of fire prevention/fi<Jhting facilities; how these system operate: and be sure that they ,He propcrly desiryned and are in working order. c. Cost: The builrlers i'lnrJ contractors pay a permit fee: durin~ the inspection process they should be able to expcct that the fee p~iñ to the Building Dcpartment should covcr é111 the inspections necessnry for that building. ~n issue is currently developing rcgar~ing the North Né1ples Fire Dcpartment related to the fee that they Are chargin~ for fIre insrections: if they a:ú char1inry for inspcctions th~t arc carried out for services as requested by Collier ~ounty as n matter of exercise of Authority [or carryin<J out the huilding codes, then, perhaps, the County should be reimbursin~ the Fire Departnents for those inspection~. If this is not to be the case, then, perh.,ps, the County wOlJlò sUCJCJcst that their own inspectors mak·) those inspections. This issuc is not "creepinq" into Eùst NAples Fire Department; they hAve submitted a bill for consideration by the State Le<JlslaL~rp. which may have beon modified upon the Le~islature turninq the ori<Jinal rcquest down ð few weeks ago; this request was for State authorization to charge for inspections. paq e :n MOK 060 PACE 435 . ~~, . .... .. - -- ...--. . i . :1. 'Iff.,} -' ]~- ~~. ,., ö ~; I!A a {1 ~f =.. ~ , &OOX 080 PACE 4æ M(HCh :n, l"!\ 1 Mr. ~ðrbor Raid that aside fI~~ ~he thr~e isauú9 outlincd abovo, the COr.1mittce W.15 In Dccorò ...lith the recommrm<'l.,tlon for é'I County fllnns Review Officer nnò thllt he f.eel5 thnt the Couunty ia on the ric¡ht rODd tow,)(cls 11 unified intcrprctôtion of the T'uildir.') Co(!e. tIe saiò ::hnt he WDulò likc to applaud tho ßoarò for their interest in Fire Coclcs Ilnd in the specdinC) IIp of the infipcction nnd hullr1ing permit process. Mr. ~ario LaMendola, ~ reqistcrccl architect in Collinr County concurr(')(l \.,oith th<'! rcm.1rk!l or ~'r. I\l\rhCH .111'1 ~.,ir1 thl'\t he! hclievon thnt one M~n actinC) DB a Plan nevicw Officcr in Collier ~ounty will lead to plan uniEormity, e~pecially in re9l\r~s to his 1in~ of work. Î.orr."issioncr "'iner th<1nke:l ~'r. I1nrber Eor his contribution as Ch~irml\n of the nEorcnentioneò connittec, as well as those ne~bers of County strlf.f, the construction trl1C1cs 1.l1rl the ,'rea Pi re Department personnel involvcrl in the dcvclol')ment of the sub;oct. propos",l, Mlninq thi1t this hl1rmoniouD reli1tionr;hip hcnef.its the entire Count.y. lie concllldcd that it i5 hifi hope t!1ë1t thifi relationship contir.ur-s. Î.Or.H:1!sf;!onor I"'imer mover!, fj(!conrìc~l hy (;onmissioner ~'ren7.el <1nd c"rried Imanimotlnly, U1"t the recor:1monrll1tions ollt1.!ner hy ""r. Virt,1 be Ilcccrte~ Ilnd thëlt the ßuilclinC) Inspection Oor~rtment commence the ~evnlopment of n rire Plans Rcvi(!w Section nnd iM~ncli~tely heryin nC00tiationo with the Rtnff of the fire clistrict5 to drn(t the neces- 5òry rnterlocnl A1ren~~nt~. pngc n .._","""",--~.IIIj -~ , , . '' t. ., '. " ...... MlIrch :n, 1901 " >r ~DDITION~L ~XP~NDITtn~ OF $2,900 Fon RT1\T~ ATTOnN~Y'~ OFFICE nENOV1\TION.~ - ,..PPMVEI). ..--'" . '''- ". .,; County Mon~ger Normnn oxplained that certain items such os car- peting, etc., wero inndvertently excluded from tho request for the eXPQn~lture of $3,900 approved hy tho Board during last weoks meetln9 for the renovntion of the ~tnte ^ttorney's Office. He asked the Board for approval of an additional $?,900 for this purposo. Commissioner WImer ~oved seconded by CommIs5ioner Plstor and -carried 4/l, with Commissionor ~anzel opposed, thnt the additional expenditure of $2,900 be approved for renovatIons of the State ^ttorncy's Office and that the Fiscal Officer be nuthorizcð to pr~pare the appropriate budget amendment. PO~ITION OF CItIr.F Rr. DEPENDf.NT FIRE CONTROL DISTRICTS EL~VATr.D TO P~Y G"^DP. 19 I -. .--- "V"\t ^dministrðtive Assistant Neil Dórrill st~ted that considcration of ~djustments to the position Classification and Pay plan regarding Dopendent Fire District personnel hns been continued f.rom the MlIrch 1n, 19ß1.^gendð due to certain discrapnncios founö in the salary survey information which is a criteria for classificatiön. Ite reforred to the information within the agenda packet and Executive Sum~ary dated 3/27/Bl and upon reading tho contents thereof rcported that the staff recommendation is ns follows: n. Tho positIon of Chief ho increaseö one (1) grade to pay grade 19, salary range $lO,O?7 mini~um to $2~,OS9 mßximum to coincIdo wth s¡,lary Rurvoy informtttion ~nd F.~.5. point inter-relationships. This action will re~ult in a 5\ incrense in gross p~y for both incumbcntr.. P'HJO 23 ~OOK' 060 rACE431 ., . .. . ., .r " ... . . ,..,.... ..< __. ..... ." ........111 , 1." . ~~ . . .... r , ,~ . · i C· ßook Ob () F~e\\~B b. Th.-"t the positions of Capt"in, Lieutonant IIn<1 FirefiC'hter, when viewed in context with a total position classification and PIlY plnn, inclu<1inq all <1ntermIninq criteria, in<1icate that these positions are properly classifed at thin time and, require no adjustment. Commiasionor Himer movod, secondec'l ,hy Commissioner I<ruse, that the staff recommendation outlined above be adopted. Mr. simon Chapple, resident of Golden Gate, spoke in opposition to the exclusion of a pay increase for the personnel in Golden Gate Fite Control Distict, undcr tho level of Chief. He expounded on the quality ì; ., If...). '!l1..'./". ~ l' i¡r: hf1 ~~I~ , , of men involved, the problems associated with losin~ trained men to -- other òepartments that PRY better; and the fact that those men require an incentive for continuinq their training and becoming even more proficient in their respective field, spccific~lly a monetary incentive. He concludeò his remarks by stating that in order to insure the rccruitment of the best personnel in the future he believos that the pay scale must be raised for those professional firefighters. Upon call for the question, the motion to accept the staff recom- mendation carried unanimously. ^DDITION~L PERSONNEL AND TH~ ESTAALISllMENT OF ^ DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM ON ^ LE~SE BASIS RE BUILDI~G INSPECTION DEPARTMENT ^PPROVED, FISCAL OFFICER DIRECTED TO PRf.PARf. APPROPRIATE BUDGET A~END~ENT REFLECTING AUDGP,T RF:r)!JF.ST SU",M¡\T1Y FIr;IJRF.S "'5 AMENDED. Community Development ^~ministrator Terry Virta reported that subsequent to the transfer of the administration of the Building Inspection Department in October of this year, ~~ has undertaken a thorough study of thðt department, its functions, and has compiled certain data which Is incorporated in the Executive Summary dated 3/23/8l. He outlIned the various data; referred to the various charts and briefed the Board completely on the volume of activity,~ in the Pðl:Je ?-4 , . " . , ", ., -.... --.; . 'j' ). '~ . ~:~ .. 4 . ..,. '1 Mðrch 31, 1901 ;a .' ..", '.,~ "·tt~ " ··~I ~, :1,1' ., .'t~ ..~ /~ ; subjcct dopartmcnt at thc present time as comparcd cach ye~r from 1975 throur¡h anI! inclusive of projccted lIctivity for the current, fir-cal t ycar. Mr. Virtn explained the nec~ for expanding the numbers of cmployccs in the Dep~rtment basel! on the abovc- mcntioned dat~, the comparison charts and the proj~ctions for the rcst of this fiscal year r . of the work1oa~ in that dcpßrtment. He exp1aineò that thc revenues of this departmont hav~ consistantly outpaced buñ~ete( expenses since ,.. 1976; that in 197~-79 revcnucs generAted dropped to less than twice the expenditures; anc1, that it appears that fiscal yenr llJflO-IJl will show n marked incrcase in reven~~ generllte~ by building permits as f~es collected in the first five months of this year have more than covered the budgeted expenses of the department for the entIre year. Mr. Virta outlined his rccommondations to the Board inclusive of the approval for n total cxpenditure of $'-8~,5n9.3'- which would cover the follo~linlJ: PP.RSO"l"l8L r.leven permanent inspectors Threc temporary inspectors Three Clerical contr~ctors Llcensinq Supcrvisor Benefits $t'iR,()S5.90 $lü,S(\().70 $ll ,()2D. 11" $ (\,179.5'1 $20,718.02 sun TOTAL $l3?,5t'i'-.57 , . ~ Outside Services Supplies Other C£lpitðl OutlRy $lO,O()O.()O t.15,1>91\.75 $J4,Ot'iR.()() $97,'-5.9.00 $2R9, 501>. 3/. TOTAL Mr. Virta also explained the nccd for cst~hlißhinlJ a data proces- sing system within the suhjcct departmcnt and referred to a BtU(y completed hy Dr. Thomas anc1 ð suhsequent report by her included in the ",',,, ,/;~ F.xecutive Summary. flc snid that the cost for initiating such a systom 'j':: ~OOK 960 rACE439 '.~ <I:'.!. Pal)O 25 '." ". ~._..~ ..-,;r; . . ' , , . ' ,.J-. i ,"¡~ , "J . " :'II{0.' . . ~ ". . "t"f.~, . .... '_"1I'i<I"__._~"'_,,,,,,,_ ...... -""',-"'----"....,~".,"-~~.....'.",""""..~"'""_...."-~ J ~oox 06 0 rACE 440 ~'n r c h 3 1, 19" 1 on n le~se hDais is included in tho nhovc-rofcrencod hud~et requost GU~~Dry figures and that tho County cnn enhnnce tho efficiency of the oporntiono if tho ßubjcct dcpDrtmcnt with such n proqrðm or nutomðtiion while keeping the 5tnff to n minimum. Mr. Virt~ also said thnt onc of thc clcrical positions heing roqucs tcd hll s heon i n"rlver tent 1 y hudCJ c tc<'1 with i n the ¡.:1 cc t1 on Supe rv i- sor's budqet. This person works in Immokalee nnd performs Auilding !napection (uncl:ion5. cOlnmisninnor J'lintor ßilid thnt hI) would like to see this position trnnnforrcrl into the nuildin0 Inspection Dcpnrtment hu(l'J€it retrol1ctive to 0ctoher l, 19fJO ,1n(l Commisnioner ·..Jenzel concur- red. Commissioner ~imnr rcquested tho projected revenue figures for the suhject (lepëtrtment ûnd r~r. Virt" reported that the originlll projection wùs $01?,()()O, however, this hrlo been upclëtterl ,1nrl iR now ùnticipDted thëtt the revcnue will exceed ~I,1nO,()nO. In ans\~er to Commissioner !"cnzel, Fiscðl ()fficer Hé\rold I!élll said that therc are sufficient (unrls to cover the regucster1 expcnditures. The ¿¡if;cussion continucr] find covered thc prescmt numher of pcrsonnel in the hlliidin~ dep~rtment; the é\nticipntAd nunhers rcquircd to efficiently run the ~epnrtment; the qunliCicntions necessary for those people who will fill tbc vacancies for inspectors; the fact that some of the l1forementioned expenses will he onc time only expenses, and the 'Jencr~l noed for immcdiate action in orñer to carryon the function of the depl1rtmnnt ~s uxplnine~ by ~r. Virta. Dr. L. nuth Tho~ð5 outlincò the results of her stuòy of the department reqnròing the potentinl for Automatin'J the ~ctivitios thereof ùnò referred to hor rcport dnted March 2~, 1901 which is inclu~cò in the ~xccutivc Summary. Aha explained the inefficiency of PlI<JO ?r; , , J, _.."..,......,"'._---""''''' t ......._._".-"",."",.--,,,.,.>"'_"'''',._____.";o.....,.__,..~_...__'_____m__·....·..~_,~__---·,,··, '''' IU~ .. w· , i t ~!.. 1{11 ~.,1t .' ;, . f . ........ --- Mnrch 31, l!'lRl the paperflow within thDt department; the potentinl of a data proces- sing system to negate those inefficiencies; the C0Sts of purchone versus those of leasin~ thc ncerled equipment; and hcr recommondation to install at the earliest possiblc note the follo\Ving sh~red logic equipment and that new operating procedures as outlincd within her report be implemented concurrcntly: 1 processor 5 screens and keyboards 1 imp1'ct printer softwar~ Dr. Thomas concluded her presentation by stntin~ that if the Boðrd accepts her recommendations, all but six Eorr':1s will be eliminateò' for the entire department; all reports will be generated automati~ðlly; ðll users of building permits and contractor liccnse reports will receive up-to-date information not previously accessable; ~nd, the tax rolls wIll be enhanced since the county will have a means of tracing outstanòing permits and overdue contractor liccnse renewals. In answer to Commissioner wimer, Dr. Thomas said that she would consider workin~ with the County in the interim pcriod of establishing such a projects inforMation processing ccnter in the department, anõ Mr. virta stated that his request included f.unòs for such a purpose. Commissioner wimer thanked the staff for the work involved towaròs the solvin~ of the problems of the building department and the information presented to the Roard. Commissioncr Wimcr moved, seconded by c.ommissioner Brown that the staff recommendations outlined within the Exccutivc Summary and c~plaIned by Mr. virta ann Dr. Thomas be adopted: that the Fiscal Officer be directed to prcpnrc the appropriate Budgct Amcndment reflcctint) the Ciguren ~tlthin the buòt)et requcst summary with the . t". BOOK 060 fACE4Af paCJe 27 .. " 1 " ,- i J &001 060 rAtE 442 ~arch :n, 19n1 additlonnl trnnsfer of the Cloricnl position in tmnokalee from tho su~nrvisor of Election's hu~~et to the huilrlin~ ~Qpnrtmcnt hurl00t retroactive to October 1, 19~O. ~r. Don nùr~er spoke in favor of the Motion Dn~ added that he still feels that the p~y scale for thA inspectors is not hi0h enough to facilitate the filling of. the v~cûncies that this Dction will create. Mr. vorlyn Fischer, represonting the r.ollicr County Contractor's '~50C., spoke in favor of the proposen ðction, and stated that his organization tot~lly backs Mr. virta's position on the matter. ~"r. I)ðvirl Sneeri, rè{nesentin'J the ~'.:Irco T.sland lIome Builders ~soc. spoke in favor of the proposal on the floor. ~'r. 110hcrt titter, represcnting Collier County Electric Co., spoke in support of the proposal on the floor. Mr. Tom Shields, represcnting thc Collicr County Contractor's ~ssoc., spoke in favor of thc propos~l and noted that the contractors of this County have bcen contrihuting to the general fund through the revcnue they have generatc(l via permit ilpplication charges. Ite claimed that there ðre stil certðin inequities regarding the halance of fees collected anrl the é\mount of. revenue requircd to opcrate the department and asked that the new pcrmit f.ees be reconsidered. County Manager Norman explained that these fees were estahlished at a time when various organizations, such as the banking industry, werc anticipating a recession and a drastic drop in building permits. Mr. Iterb ~avagc, reprcsenting the S.W. Chaptcr of ^merican Institute of ^rchitects, spoke in favor of the proposal being con5idered by the Boarò. Mr. Mario LeMendol~ noted that he favored the suhject proposal. Upon call for the question the motion carried unanimously. 1'/'1';1 e ?R _ " '-... p-. ..-------,---......."" ... .,~ e} '...." ;.. , .~j\ Jf '"~';-O ............, -" .. ". -' . ',. , . M.uch 11, 19ß1 5Tl\FF l\U,T110nrÙ:q rO:,I'ROCF:I::O"WITlI ,T!I¡:: .()lJT,oi~I\~1q'{ tIt:'; ß4,II;DU),G, .;WSrÚ:TÌON DE pl\nTM ¡:;NT l\NO CONTnACTU}\L S F:nVI è t.S \.¡¡1n Dn.. L. nll'rll TlIO"'l\S m: G,""'U: TR^N5ITtOW APÞnOVF:D ,Qt4. AN ,nnllnr.~ ,I1ATF., £\A<11S. . .' . , I"" ." ~: ',', .Commissioner \oHmer moved, seconòed hy Cómmissioner f\rown and ~ cðrrled unanimously, that the stnff be authorized to p¿ocoed ~ith the "" . ¡ . . . nutomntion of the Building Inspection Department as soon as possible; t And th'a·t cont.'r'actual' services with Dr. L. nl\th Thor.H1S regarding this tr,ansÙion h'e approved on <In hour)y rate bn!iis. . r,: Co'unty MlInagcr Norr.1an CXP~l1 iner1 ~hat, D_. Thoméls i~ ,cur.ron,~,\J c~nducting a word processing study and will'w6rk with the ~~bje~t d~~ðrtment concurrently. . f " I)E!)OLIITION No.rH-ß() RE AUTHOnI7..'\TION TO ACCF,P1' THE ',"¡^Rr.~NTY 'öÜb FRO.'" Dr::L'rO!,/l\ CORPURl\TlON IN EXC~I¡\NGF. FOn. 50 TDI1'~' Fon L,1I,~rJ LOCl\TF.O IN ~ECTIO~~'S 10 &_)), T52S, R?!)F:,- A~~~~cF.PTrm ,FOn:, RF:c~RT)7\TI.~N ,.PIFlnner Lee Layne read the information..,.¡i,thin th,e ¡:;x.ecu~iv\e. .....,..:: summary. da~.\?ò 3/16(81, inc1ud,in~ the fact t~at Deltona corpoa~.~}:9.n, has received.SOTDR's in~~chanqe for the dedication of 101.2 ~cr~~ of land locate~ northcast of the ~arco River in Sections lQ and ll, T525, R2fiE~ . .., . ..~" Thcre was a hrief discussion regarding..the 'filct that the suhject land is not developable as pointed out by CQmmissioner Wen~el and cö~curred to by' ~s. Layne, during which she, explained tha~, a~cordlnCJ to S~ction 9.9 of the_~o~inCJ Or~inAnce, Deltona is not required to dedicate (~evelopahle lands; further, she inòicatedthat Deltonél ,is , " allowcd the Ton's iegardless of w~ether or· n~t the Board choo~es to accept the deed for re~ordation. , . .' Comrniksioner ßrown ~oved, seçonded.by ~ommissioner p~stor and. carriéèl-1/l,"\.¡itQ.'Comm,issioner ,\.¡cnzel opposed, that Resolution No. Bl~n~ ~u~hbr~zlnCJ .the ßOÐrd to acccpt,tha subject Warranty De~d be . ',. I .' I l .' I adopt,e~1, 1;11;)(\. ,t,ha~. t.he ,!?,ub;j¡e,ct. ~çle~ .9r accepte,d ~9r.- ,ec,o.r~Dt i.?n.. ; :'" ~OOK 060 PACE 443 rð CJ 0 29 ~ . . '. ',I ,', .... I ~..-._--.....-..-. .~: '..... or","· , ) ~ '. .. . '. ,~'. . /1"'- ..... .' , t, .' ~-----"'_.......- -_.._-_.._..~"..".__....,~,-,...., UU I¡.~ .' !!Ji' Bffl ~~It ':I 14, .~ . ~ .' {\~ if ~-~, f· 2,. ',1" March :31, 1/)31 I.. ! j ~ -¡ I t . .... " >- ·~~i ",'~ ·I-··;~ :..::~-,..: ,."". , t;¡.' ,: :tt '<~ .~ ,~, . t/~ '" ;i,¡' '1, 'î! ¡,f., J} Lr.ASE M~RF.F.MF.NT WITH CìOLDF:"I Gl\TF: FIRF. Mf>OC. Fon UfiF: OF ßUIT,I)INC FW GOT.DEN m,Tr. F'ITU: DI;,TT1YCT - API'T10Vrm f'On ¡::XF.CI!TtO~ T\V TTlE CTlAtnt-4M~ - - · Public 5afcty ^dministrðtor Thom~~ Itnfner rcfcrrecl to tho ~xccu- tlve 5um~nry dAted '/3l/~1 nn~ exrlninc~ thðt he is reco~mp.nding thnt the current lease agrccment with Golden Gate Fire ~ssociation be cllncclled Ðn~ that an ongoing contract for monthly rental at $100.00 per month for use of th~ h~ilding by the Golden Gate Fire Department effective Octoher 1, 1900 he approved for the Chairman's execution. Commissioncr Wcnzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimou~ly, that the aforementioneà lease agreement he can- celled and that the new proposed monthly lease agreement with Golden Gate Fire Assoc. he a~proveò for exe~ution by the ChairMan. There was a brief discussion regardin~ the possibility of acquir- . ing the subject building hy the County and County Manager Norman saId that the present revenue for the Golden Gate Fire Control !)istrict is not sufficient to purchase the building at this ti~e. Also òiscussed was the possibility that pcrhars the Golden Gate Fire Assoc. could be approÐched regarding the huilding. ~'r. Hafner said that he \.¡ould look into the matter. BOOK D60 PACE449 P~'Je 30 , < ~ .. "'J";', .'" '. ~..,. .t'''',-).~''. .~..~; y; . . " .- .,. :'V: ",. ft·' __"'_"""'~''''''''''''''''''__'''_''____~__''''''~OM·''''M.~,.,_m.'''",'~ J ~JOK œ 0 rACE 4152 r~l'\rch 31, 19n1 LP."~~ FOR p.xt5Tn(j AI.\p.!1Ir;"N ""I01lLANCr., P-1r:. Itr.Ar'JI)UARTF.TH; 0'" O"VI5 00tH.f.Vf\nD APPTHWF:D FOn r:Xr:CIJTtO'" IW 1'Hr. cn" tn~'''''' f - County Manager Normôn saicl thnt he prcpi1red the f.xccutivo Summnry re'JrcHng the lc,'15c on tho Amorican "mhu1I1ncp. heM1C]unrterg in tho nhsonc'! of Mr. 11,')[ner who just roturnod from hin vl'lc,:oltion. 110 sl3irl that durinq the cour~e of tho negotiations that hnvp. hoon trl)n~piring between representatives of "merciôn Ambulance, the poszihili1ty of tho Cnunty leasing their present headC]unrters on navis Boulevard was hrou~ht up. lie si1id that nt that timn he asked for A cost propo~al from American "mbu1nncc which was not rcceiv~d until lnst Friday. Mr.Normnn said th"t ho deforred proceeding with the improvements to the facility on "irport Road which has boen previously authorized for lease by the ßoétrd as êln ë\mbu]ancE1 headC]lIûrters. ~r. Norman said that the report th~t he has provided within the F.xecutive Summary (laterl 3/31/111 include" û cOlT1plHison of the nnnual costs of the two facilitios an~ û riqure of two months rent for the nforementioned existing lease for the "irport noa~ property. He said that this tHO month:; is an estimate ûnd mðy be considerecl an optimistic time li~it for "'Jotting out from under" the "irport noad property 1easo. Mr. Norman addod that during the first full year of oporntion the County would save S~,lOO hy using the nÐvis Aoulûvard property; ovor 1'\ three year rerlo~ it will cost the County G~,~OO more to use thi'1t 5f11H! property. l1e ::;¡dr1 that in consi(lering thi::; matter Dnd, hecûu::;e thero is fI substDntii'11 nmount oE air conditioned ofEice and stori'1CJc r;pl1ce at the fJavi8 [\oulev<'lrd location ,1nd, in rccognition of the spflce shortë\ryc thl1t the County 1~ confronted with, he helieves thDt for purpoAes othcr thétn jUGt th~ amhulnncÐ service, that it iG worth giving ::;erious consñcration to lAaning the existing ñmhull1ncQ l'ñgo J1 ,.. ~~ . \.~I. - .iJ! ·~¡1f., ,":1¡ ~~ .~. '··;n~:, -.. -- , ~ .·,..~4.;" March 31, l!!Ol . ., headquarters on Dovis Boulevard. Normon said thnt the moin ,.~~' i"'~~~ .:~<:i " ).: :..~ Mr. odvantage to the r.~5, by doing so, iß that the phones lire in place; the . t,i. . 16 rðdio equipment is in place; and at the point of transition at mlðnl~ht .;~ on April S, 1981, the County coul~ taKe over without lIny potential for loss of services. He said that even if the County had startcd to improve the Airport Road property two weeks a~o there would have been ð number of problcms involved in that transition situation. He said that ðnothcr advantaqe to the navis ßlvd. property is that there will be indoor storage for equipment that is not prcsent at the other fðcility. In answcr to Commissioner Wimer, Mr. Norm~n said that this is the larger of the two facilities¡ the air-conditioned space is approximatp.ly the same¡ the space not air-conditioned is over twice that of the 1\irport Road facility. Commissioner Wimer asked Mr. Norman if he has any problem, from a political point of view, with renting the subject building from Kathy Maguirc, and he asked if this was part of the condideration? ~i. Norman replied that he believes the Board knows h~m well enough to know that he tries not to let politics enter into this situation; it is being looked at strictly as a business transactiço; the rental rates have been examined; Mrs. Maguire's appraisal of the property was examined and this rcntal rate is based on an ll' annual return on that appraiscd value of the subject property, and he saId that he believes thZlt this figure is "in the ballpark" for this type of operation. lie said that if the Board agrees with his recommendation this will be strictly an "arms length" transaction betwecn the County and a property owner. Commissioner Wimer said that from the reports that Mr. ~ormnn has mado to the Commissioners and the correspondence that he has seen, it appears that Mrs. Maguire has been most cooperative and helpful . / .1 .. &OOK 060 PACE45g , ./'t..~ '...''c :·:X·:f~ -'~~ <4Æ.~J . "'. "'.'j;¡,., , JJo:;:":,""~ ',f~~.(1 , ·;'~~;H~ pa<Je 32 , If", ..... .'~ -"7"''','':'t.:~..,... " '. ··'r'".,:'I.· . "':.:'/',.1" '.'f":"" . = .,~ ........' . ...-.__.__.... '. '( __·___'<I_"'.........__.,."'___-..,'"'..~·....._oM_.,__4,..'.'._.."''''''..,'''''".,.....,.." _'0."... ...._"",_......._~..,._"'..'_.,_'.q_.".,_..,'~ II J~~' i. ¡Y' i J' . ::' '~ . , . .,~ f, . ' ,;, i!~ ; I!n~ , MO:( 060 r^cE454 M<trch :11, 191Jl .--- durin0 this entiro tr<1nr.ition perioò. ~r. ~ormòn rcplic~ thòt ho fècls, to tho be!\t of her nbility, she hM'I. Ite Raid thllt ~rß. Mò~uIro'8 nttornoy hnß nlßo hoen ronaonnhlo to work with. In nnswer to r.omminnioner pistor, Mr. NormDn rcportecl thnt the County Attorney has pnrticipnten in practicnlly every meetin~ that has t~ken plDcc with ~nericnn ^mbulnncC! reprencntntives. in nnswer to CommiA5ioncr Wimer, ~r. Norman replied affirmntively thnt this is n lo~ical thin~ for the County to no. Mr. Mike Zewalk, resident of North ~npleg, nsken the noard if the County is evcr goin1 to Bevcr relations with AMcrican Ambulance com- plctly? 110 said thùt he helievcs thDt there is a rcsentment on the part of taxpnycrn to continuin'1 nny such relations \dth th1.2t firM l1nd thðt be nlso believes thnt thorn nrc nltnrnntive huildinqs thnt could he huilt, rented or le.1serl in tho nlðce of a hui1rlinq ownccl hy Mrs. r~ògui re. Therc wòs a hrief discu~sion re1Drrlin~ the hest and least expen- si'/C 'day to operate the ð';1hulnnce service, :-luring \;hich COlT'lmi!1sionor pi~tor stated thnt the nODrd is leaving open the posnibility of futuro moc1ificàtions Dfter the County nctually finds out whDt it really costs to run this scrvice; this measure is not neccs!1arily permanent. He said that whnt the County is trying to do is opcrate a system that is as 100d or hetter than the r.ounty has hnd in tho past. County Managcr Normnn stnted thAt he woulrl lik~ to make it cle~r thnt therc is no legal relationship hetween the party with whom tho County would be le~5inCJ this huilding i1nc1 Americ¡:¡n Ambulancc, ,1:=; of April Ii, 19R1. Ho said th~t the [3o¿¡rd \;oulrl hI') c1cêl1in0 with ~~r5. !<athy McGuire, iI prop- erty investor; Mr. McGuire would not hc involved. Commissioner ristor asked Mr. pickworth if is evorything regarrlinq ; . Pl1'JQ 33 :j,.... j, i .~: ; .,. I)ofi''''. ...J; ,.t,~': ,., . ;f^'\ . .' ..< ¡ t, i!.ø ' If 11 ~..14 ,1., 'ii.' ,'¡ ,. '.'''''1._''''''_ ,",-"~> . .' " March 3l, 1901 the negotiations with ~rs. Maguire for the subject lease is "clear cut"and if he felt thnt enterin~ into this lease is what is bost for the County? Mr. pickworth replied affirmntively, ndding th~t he hopes thnt tho other building on Airport Ro~ð is lensed hy the owner, Mr. Cervelli, soon in or~er that the County will not be responsibilc for töo much rent. In answ~r to Commissioner pistor, Mr. pickworth said that the County could advertise the Airport Road property for sub-leasing althou~h he sees no advantage to thnt as ~r. Cervelli is presently trying to lease that space. Mr. pickworth said that Mr. Cervelli is willing to work with the County, and Mr. Norman remin~ed the ßoard that Mr. Cervelli does have a contract with the County. Commissioner wimer moved that the staff recommendation be accepted and thnt the lease agreem~nt for the existing ambulance head~uarters on Davis Boulevard be approveò for the Chairman's execution. Commissioner Wenzel asked if the motion should not include a clause that this leAse be entered into only upon the successful term- ination of the other lease for the building on Airport Road? County Manager Normnn said that he has to have the authority to enter into the lease immediately in order to move into the huilding within a week's time. When asked by Commissioner Wenzel whether the County will then have to continue to pay rent on two buildings, Mr. pickworth said that whn:: will happen is that for however long it takes for Mr. Cervelli to re-rent the buildin~ that the County has already leased, the County is going to have to bear th~t cost; Mr. Norman has already figured on two months rent in his recommendation; and, if it goes beyond this time frame than th~ additional gS50 p~r month will have to bp. paid by the County. Commissioner Wenzel asked why this was not considered prior to signing the 1\irport Road lease and Mr. Norman said that, at that time, nOOK 060 PACE455 PllCJC 3" ~-,_.. ~-'~- , . ,--, '''1 ' . . I ' ::1 I ~ ~.~ . T FW"!'IIf-."",,_~ ''''''Ii''~_ .'" J \ ...~ ~~~. ',tl ~. ~. ~~'. }. ¡Ii .;:,. :f: "'.' "" ~Jrì ,.. ,;¡.... MOX 060 PAcE4&> "Inrch :n, 19fn tho County coul~ not evcn ~s much ao talk to tho people at ~moricðn ^mbulftncc. Mr. pickworth Rnid thnt, nuhscqucnt to thnt timo¡ tho County hl\s hoen dealin~ with Mrs. "ID0uire Dnrl her attorney; they soem to hnvc 1\ certain I\mount of control ovcr this situntion nnd, therefore, the County wns nblo to conclude an ncccptðhlo a~reemont with thom. Commissioner ~i~tor 5ccon~cò Commissioner Wimer's Motion which .~ cl\rried ~/l, with Commisøionor wenzel opposed. .j \ Pl\CJe 35 . , .... "'w".'M""_".~"~'"""__''''''''_'''''_''''_''''''''''''''''-''~__--'_'I__'_~'''"'NfIIO__~._.___,_"'"____,"._.,_,.,"h._....·,w.~·""'_·""·"''''',".'·'''''·''''''.""'......<».-......."'.-."""'" ~ ~.__. , I t i ~ 171 Ji~ .~~ ~~,~~ .-~ ...f.} ¡':{d ;!"I ,~ b ~;f¡ ;'\'1'! )~~ ; ~ 'i"~! "~ March 31, l')nl fiTAT!J!', m:ronT 111': COUNTY l\Mn1Ll\~r.r. sr.nV!CF: - ACC;r.r>TF:T1 - Public !'iaícty l\drninlstr.l1tor Thoman lIë!fncr roported that everything is running on schedule re~arding the tranaition of the ambulance service all thp. liccnsin1 proccsscs lIrc unòerway; nnd that he sees no prohlema associated with the C;ounty takcovcr at l?:Ol A.M. Sunday "--~ night, nor ~ny rcðson why therc would be D ll1pse of service becl1use of the transition. There was a brief discussion rcgarding the use of. a county vehicle by the E~S Director Douglas Greenficld, during which Mr. Hafncr ex- plained to Corn~issioncr Brown, that the vehicle Mr. Greenfield is driving is not a new car; it is one from the motor pool. Also discussed hriefly was Commissioncr Brown's qucstlonin~ the use of the motor pool vehicle when bc undstands there will he éI numher of these motor pool vehi cl es required for use by the newly IIpprovcc:1 building inspector pos it ions. County "IanaCjer Norman s a i (1 thl\t the vehicle that Mr. Greenfield is using is heing chòrgeñ to the E"IS budget and has he en approved as part of the E~S budget for the remainer of the current fiscal year. Mr. Hafner concurred and said that the F:~S bud~et is being chargcd ?'7¢ per mile for the use of that v~~icle. TRUST DEF:D TO LF:LY HIßISCtJS GOLF COllnSE SURSTITtJTED Fan IRnEVOCl\ßLE LETTERS OF CREnIT 1\5 Sp.cunITY Fan LELY Rl\REFOOT ßF.l\CII; PAL"IETTO DUNES l\ND TOnRF.:Y P!N¡::S; SI\~1E r.r.TTF:nS or CT'\lmIT T1F:LF:l\SF.D ßV 'I'll¡=; COU"lTY . Public Works l\dministrator clifford Barksdale cxplained that the County is prescntly retaining Irrevocable Letters of Credit as security in the indicatcd amounts for each of the following suhdivisions: BOOK 060 rACE 457 '-'~ ~! ",~:;~ \";: " ; 1'1 :<~ 'J., .. '-.k;.^ .' ,_.~. .-. ---......---. '~-...: I " 'I~~ ~;;-i:r. . I ".:I~~';fo... "'~r-' .~ 'to . . P"<JO 3G .,.'. ;',. . .. ..' "'I < .. PiOO:< oGO rAcE458 March 11, lC)nl 1. Lely narefoot ßel1ch ?. Torroy Pines 3. Pillmetto Dunea Sll!1,r!70.00 $ 73,000.00 S31~,?"7.50 l1e went on to 5i1Y that Lely F::>tûtes, Inc., is requesting the release of the three Irrevocùhle Letters of r.reòit ùn~ the suhstitution of a Trußt ." .:,tI! ~, il ,<'I'I J?i: 'Wf' c'.' Doed for Lely !1ihi::cus Golf Course <IS the <JuùrantoC! security. Mr. ßarksd~le said th~t iho stðff ùnrl the County ^ttornoy hðve reviewed the Trust Deed, th~ Title Opinion, and the CÐrtifie~ Apprais~l and it is their recommendation thðt the noard approve the substitution ðnd approve the rcleùse of the three Irrevocùhle Lettcrs of Credit. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconde~ hy r.ommissioner ßrown ðnd carricrl ~/l, with Com~iG5ioner ~cnzel oppooeó, to nccept ðhove-refer- enccd sti)ff rl~cor:1mcl1cJé1tion rðlJO 37 ., ,t. . """""~""'''''''''''_"'';'''''"'''''_"'-'--,"-'''.'''I""""-~..,....",.,,,',.--_._..."_~"",_""_"____""_,~__,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,_,,_,,,,___,_,,,,,,,,,,,_,,_,,,,,,,,,,",,'"' J MO~ 080 rACE 400 ~nrc:h :n, It)rn OlD ~~77 rnR P1\VUNr. 1\NO ORAINAGP. IMP~OVf.\\F.NT;' OF ßf.~50N f,T1l.EET 1\WARDF.D TO rmtf>SO!\l P'~'¡TF.n.prHSf.!), tNC., IN THF. AW'J!J"J'I' OF' to??, 3~1. nn . to. Le0ð1 notice hðvingbcen puhlished in the Naples Dally News on Fehruary 17 nn~ 19, l~Rl, an evidcnced hy ~ffidðvit of Puhlication filed with' tho Clerk, hids wcre received [or nid ~"77, for paving and rtrolnnqo i~rrovements of Benson Street, up to Mùrch lR, 19n1. COMmissioner WDnz~1 ~ovcd, seconrte~ by ~ommissioncr ~ruse and c~rric~ unanimously, that Bid 11177 for pnvin~ And drainnge imrrovements of Dennon ~treet be nwnrded to Brisson r.nterprises, Inc., in the amount of ~~7,39~.nn ns contained in the reco~mendntion within the Executive SIJr.1rnary ~1<'1te(1 l/lr'l/f1l "nd th.,t the Chairmùn be ñuthorlzod to sign ðnr'l the r.lerk to (')tte3t the rc;,ultinr¡ ;)C)reencnt. RtO '17~ pon r~VI~G ~~o nn^IN~~~ r~rnOV~~E~TS OF R~Y STn.E~T ~NO FP.1l.N STnr.r.T ~"~,\~f)r.') 1'() ~·.1\r.A:;r"i'\L1', INC. 1"1 T~IF: i'\'I()IJ'I1' 0F <;ll,IAt).On ",--- LegAl notice høvinC) be~n rublishe~ in the Naples Dnily Mews on Fehruùry l7 and 19, 10Rl, ~s eviden~ed ~y i'\ffidnvit of publication (ile(l with the r.lerk, hi<13 were received for r.ir'l '''7R, for paving and drninn~e improvemcntn of BDY ~treat and Fern Street, up to March l~, 19~1. COf"missioner '·.~enzcl moved, ~;econñú(l by Commi:;sioner ¡(ruse and clIrried unnninou5ly, thnt nid a<17R for p¡wing ¡!Or1 drainage improvements of ßny StrCGt ancl rl1rn Strl1ct b~ nwnrdec1 to ~1i1c";,phi11t, Inc., in tho nmount of $"l,,,,,~.nn ns containccJ in the recommcnc1ntion within the Executive Summùry dntecl 1/l9/Rl nn~ thnt thn Chnirmnn be nuthori~cc1 to sign LInd the Clcrk to attc~;t the resllltin~ CI']recMcnt. *******r.ommisnioncr Krusc left the room ~t this tine - 12:00 Noon ***** paga 38 '~, .f. :.~. .. ~Q¡ "Ii: ,Æ , : ,.r. ~ .~ Off -~ ',' , , MArch :'1, 191)l CONTRACT MONIFICATIONS TO nE INtTIAT~D TO R~LFLECT n~DUCTIONf> IN C~TA TITLr. '[t-D " TITLE VI ({'SF.) fUN!)!> · .. -- ~. - . " Actin~ CETA Dircctor John Walker roferrod to tho informntion within the Executive Summary dated 3/~0/!1l lIn(l ey.f)laincd thðt certain public section employment positions within the CETA program will be phllsed out rJuc to thc rrcsiricnt's bunget revisions. lie said thllt all program~ funded undcr TitlQ~ II-D and VI will bc phnsed out by Reptern- ber 30, 19RI; thût this hud~et revision includes deferral of Title II-D funds ann rescission of Title VI funds and thðt these two actions are to be implcmented immedintely by the Department of tabor which is the funding source of CET^. IIc outl incd the dates on which each of the thrce affected areas will cease participation and noted that this \~ill mean layoffs of approximately II? CETA particif)ants cmploy~d in various positions in Collier County. Mr. \-Talker referred to the propose!'1 plans for seeking other areas for gûinful employment for these people and added that he is requestin1 thnt the Ronrd authorize the initiation of the balance of state contracts reflecting the aforementioned conttdct modifications, noting that the new cETA Director, Mr. Don Norton, who will assume his position April ~, 1901, will brin~ them back to the Board for approval upon completion. Also, he wil~ report on the status of the Psr. phase-out at that timc. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioncr Wimer and carried ~/O, with Commissioner Kruse out of the room lit the time of thc vote, that the staff recommendûtion be accepted. It was also the conscnsus of the Board that they should be furnished with a list of cach person affected by the phase-out and thcir rcspective prcscnt positions. MDX 060 rACE 481' Page 39 I,' . . .' ~-;..... . ;..: . . .' ' ::, . U). ã~~ . ~~.. Id1 ~..I~ J ~oo~ 060 f^CE 482 ~,1rr.h :n, l0nl *****Commissionor nro'~n left tho room ~t thI5 tIme - 1?:05 P.M.***** MR. WILLIAM M. D~NTY ^rpnINT~D ~~ nln~CTon or "AT' pnoc~~st~~ nIvt~IO~ · I - - - Commis~ioner Wcnzel movari, sccon~c~ hy Commissioncr Wimor ~nd carricr) 1/0, wIth r.omr:'lißsionerr.; '<ru::;o lInd nrown out of the room tit the timc of the vote, th~t Mr. williðm M. Denty be appointed as Director of Dntn ProceHsin1 Oivi·Jion, an rer.oMmon~ed hy the Dntn Procesnlnq Committee. ********REcE8S - TI~~: 1~:n7 ~.M. to 1:~5 r.~. lit ~1ich******** time Dcputy Cl~rk Darlene Dnvi~50n was replaced hy Deputy Clerk Slinor ;'kinncr. ~1.~nr.o s~:\"'f.n P!l^f,f. I r'\Pr¡()Iff.~r::N'¡'S I¡TILt'''l f.Mìr·:·~f.:'!T, :)f.LT0NA - M:r.f.I'TF.:D FOR rH:Cnrm~Tto!-/ ".. .,..h.. -' " ~ Conmissioner '\~(!nz~l moved, secon(ier hy COMmissioner ':,'imcr Ctnd carried unanimously, th~t the Donrd of r.ounty Commissioners, Ex-Officio Governing noar~ of the Marco Watcr Ðnd ;,ewcr District, ncccpt thc Utility EaseMent and ~ssignmcnt and authorize the Clerk to have this , Document record~d in the Officinl necords of Collier County, in order to permit the construction of t"IO (?) lift stations, i'.IS [.:!commendeeJ by the Utilitioc Mannger. PlIgc: -10 ·II.]~··...·.·· . 'w~ . . ~·,r· ":.',: .. ;¡-··~í I !~': i,H ~ '., 1 t " V- I ~' ~~. .t t· " ) bQO~ 060 rACE ø Hnrch 31, 11)01 ru:r.OLU'I'!ON m'l-!H-l m: ACCr.I"TINC'i TII!'!EF.: (3) £.0\'" CON~'I'!'!!Jr.'I'ION ßII)~; ST1\nT OF CQNf.TIìUCTION UPON 1\PPROVM. OF "!'!OJECT )'{ FM!1^; ^1JTIIORI7.INC'i RF.:CON- FtIì~^T!O\ PlJor.!C IIE:AIìII-,J(1 TO OF. ItF.LD ON APRIL ?O, 10n1 - I\DOP'I'P.rJ . County Attorney pickworth cxplðincd tho procn~urc wherohy tho Goodlan~ W~ter nictrict con5Lruction hids nocessitate n roconfirmfttlon puhlic hot\r1nl), to (,llow tho start of. construction hy ëlcc~ptinCJ throo low hids, and he rccom~endc~ sftid hearinl) h~ held on ^prll ?P, 19~1. lie noted th"t the to¡)ic was discussed nnrt anproved hy tho ßOl:lrd on "1arch ?'11, 19131. Commiscloner Wcn~el movcrl, oncondcd by Commissioner Krusn nnd c1\rried un~nimou!;ly, thnt lìQsollltion (;!'I-nl-1, to ncccpt three (3) low conctruction hlds, start construction of the (;oodlnn(l \'¡ater District system upon npprov1\1 of the project by FmH^ and to set the reconfirmð- tion puhllc hearin"J for ^pril ?O, 1981, he ftdopted. Pl\go -1l , 1 '. , . ". .. , '.'''' l~ i 'j' t ~" J ~oo~ 060 rACE 472 ,~.Hch 31, lI)Ol " INCRr.A!';lm FF:I'~~ FOR t.r..110R CONSlIt.T1\NT .Jr.."1F.!\ "1. nr.tIF:, M, nr::Q1Jr.r.TF:D ny C()\)N't"l ATT()n~1I::Y - r..tJ'l'~lorH 7. For') # .._ _..., r.'..... - County Attorney Donnld A. pickworth explaine~ that the firm of tho 'County lõbor consultrlnt, Mr. .1c1mc5 M. Glue, has recently raised its fee~, effective February l, 1931, to $n~.on Ðn hour for partners and $75.00 nn hour f.or ðssociates. lie saiò he felt the f.ees wero f;lir ...nd that the results achiev0d by the County, through ~r. nlue's ðdvice in the P,1st, \~arr.:lnts continuerl use of the f.irm, .:In(} he requested RO<1f(l authorization to continue the services of. Mr. Blue at the raiscd rates. Commissioner Brown moved, Aecon~ed by Mr. Wimer and carried unanimously that the Roõrd ôuthorize continucò lIse of the firm of l~bor consultant, Mr. JA~CS M. Blue, At the raised rates of ses.nn per hour for partners ùnd S75.00 õn hour for ôssocic1tcs. CIIl\rR~~l\~ A\IT!lO'l!7.F:D ï'f) EXê.CtJTF: ^ TRIJST DF:F:f1 FOR pqOPF:RTY PI PARf< SIIO!1F: F~R SCOTTSn^LS CO~PA~Y . _____ft. ._. _. _ County Attorney Donalñ ^. pickworth requested that the Board authorize the chnirMan to sign c1 trust deeò for property the County had taken f.qr ~uh~ivision improvement in Park Shore, since the improvements have heen co~pleteð. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Drown and carried ~/1, with Commissioner Wenzel opposed, thôt the Chairman be 1Iuthorized to execute a trust òeed for the Scottsdale Company for propcrty in Park Shorc. Note: Certificate of Deposit not received in Clerk's office .as of 4/l5/8l. ra'Jc -12 . , ''''._--_....__.__.._-~.........~~'''''"-.,~'~.~..''~.."..,',.~'_.''..-." MlIrch :n, ll')ßl ROUTINe ßILL~ - ^ppnOV~D Fon P^YME~T ~ Commis~ioncr Wcnzel moved, socon~od by CommissIoner Kruse and carriod, that the bills, havin~ he en processcd followin~ estnblishe~ proccdurc with funds av~ilablc, be approved for payment as witnessed by tþe following checks Issued from March 25, 1901 through March 3l, 19~J: l\CCOUNT CHECK NOS. County Chet::i<s 1;1)03 - ¡;9nl ace PlIyroll 211';32 - 22l0l BUDGET l\M~\D~r.NT RI-57 m: TRl\NSrF:n OF FIJNf)!> TO F:NTTmpnI5E FUNf) Fon fMERGF.Ncy ."1r.DICl\L 5F:RVICF: FliNT) - ADOPTF:D IN THE AMOUNT OF $3l9,ORD Commissioncr Wimcr moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse an~ .. cllrried unaniMously, that Budget l\mcnònent ßl-57 re transfer of funds from Ambulance ServIce to Enterprise Fund to properly reflect the transactions involving the new Collier County Emergency MedIcal ~ervice Funò be adopted in the ñmount of $319,On9. ( , MQK 000 ~.\c¡475 rag e "3 " I "1nrch 31, 1901 1<1 .:;....\ L:; . 1';,:1 ,d !¡1~1~ ~~t i f~ '.~" .¡t,J,. J3\JDGET lIME~OME:NT Al-5ß RE TMNSFER OF FUNDS Mi PART OF' ESTl\ßLI5I1~EN" OF ENTP.RPRISE fU"!1) OF' r.~f.RGENCY MEDICI\L SERVICE FUND - ADaPTED IN TIIF: 1\MOU~T OF' $~?,555 -- '.. - . .. . -.- -. ~ . :-: .. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Com~ls5ioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that Au~get I\mendmcnt Rl-50 transferring fun~s to tho Entcrprise Fund liS pllrt of the estélblishment of the Collier County Emergency Medical Serviçe Fund be a~optcd in the amount of $~2,555. ~DK 060 f'ÀCf.477 Pð<J e .,., " I '.~' ·1 .' "', :! ¡, .' ,t .,' {:, ,_~,~;,1~ ;,.II'·t¡ /"~ ,:,~r. 'é ~ ~~f ':r( ',;J~: .-. '~-- '. ')' . Morch 31, 19f11 BUDGET J\MENDMr.NT fI l-59 RE TMN~n:R OF FtJ:mS .FEE~ OF J\SSOCIATED UTIL!TY SF.RVICES, INC. - $S,llO. . Commissioner Wimer moved, seconrled hy Rt. COST OF CONSULTJ\TION J\DOPTED IN THE J\MOUNT OF - - . . --.. Commissioner Kruse and carried unnnimously, that Dudget Amendment 01-59 transferring fun~s for cost of Associated Utility Services, Inc. for rate consultation regðrding Waste MÐn~gemcnt, Inc. he adopted in tho amount of $5,110. .-) , ~. ~'Ií: -I!:ì {~ 'I ¡ ,,;~ '~/ ,." " ,..,¡. :! .~. tOOK 060 rACE 479 pngo -15 i '~"'_""'*'_'"_"""'_'___''''''''''''___I#_o..<;,,,___I''' ~I""'I_" ,.,I-",__,.'¥"t ..... .~ ..---,~-~--"""--"."..,,,-,,--.--~~.=~,..".,. ......, ..~ ., , Mðrch 31, 19/'11 AUDCET J\M~~DMr.NT Ol-~O n~ TRANSFER or FUNDn TO LInRnRV-COLLIER NonT11 FOR Sr.RVIC~ OF t'ART-TIMr. PME POf>I'I'ION - AD:)t'TED IN TI1r. J\"10tJNT OJ? $:1,771 ... . . - - . . . . -..----- Conmissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissionor Kruse ~nd carried unanimously, that nud~et Amendment Rl-r,O transferring funds from tho M~rco Island ~ibrAry to Collier North, for part-time page position be adopted in the amount of. $3,77l. aoOK 060 rACE481 P"ge II) i "~'C"~"'____'__"'___"_____~_""''''' :~ t,ì 'ì,.: . ' .. ·."1 . .~. " #- -:of:: ..!,~ , :'~~~ .i;~ ·41 .;~ '~ ~:1\ .~~ ':;,~ ,. ~ '" " )~ . ;.~ ,~ :~ "I~'¡~ ..,:.,:^. . '¡' '. . ."~~ . . .... ..... 'l~ ..',,-j: --... ........., . March :n, 19!'1l BUDGF.T A~F.NO~F.NT nl-~l RF. TR~N~FEn OF FUNDS TO WITNr.G~ ASf>I~TJ\NCe pnor,nl\M F'an ptmCIIMF. OF MaRtLF. o¡:,¡;,tCP. - ADOPTlm IN THP. ~~()!JNT OF $R, ?57 Commissioner Wimer move~, seconded by Commiss10n~r Kruse and carried unélnimously, that nud<Jet J\mcndment Bl-íi} transferrin') funds to the Witness ^s51stance program for the purchase of ð mobile office be aðopteå in the amount of $0,257. MOK 060 PACE 4B3 p/)I'JQ 117 I I ~ , ¡ I..J I r,.' :J ,-.,';'" :r'1~' ..:,;{ .t~ ~¡~ .~ ;')i¡ ~~ .¡?J -<,i! ,.,;.,. f. ~ ;.!~' >'C..'wo ',,,:}." ··¡:'rt.;; .~i· ¡:i~,¡ '~ ~;,~ '¡t4 , '~"'C -.-J .-...J . MlHCh :11, 1901 BUDGET r..MP.NDMEN't' Ol-I:;? RE TRANf,FER OF FII~DS 'I'D AD"IINIS't'RI\TIVr. SF.nVICES DIVISION FOn NEW POSITION OF ASSISTr..NT COUNTY MI\NAGEn - r..DOPTED IN THE r..~OUNT or $19,?ln , ---- -,,- CommiGsioncr Wimer moved, secon~cd by Commissioner KruSQ ðnd carried unnnimously, that ßuð~et Amondment Ol-fi2 trðnsfcrrin~ funds to cover the COfits for a new position of Assistant County Manager/Admini- ~: strative ;,erviccs I\dministrator be adopted in the amount of ~19,?la. ~OOK 060 PACE 485 pagn 1\11 I ~¡ 1 /:" j~; :ç;. sj J~~ ... ';;t ,:¡) . ~ f ~i ..:; '. '~ ;) ,\ <t; ~ " :~ ~. ¡'~ -' .....-... .. i^ I * , ~i ;;1 ¡G" Mnrch 31, 1!131 BUDn~T 1\MEND~ENT ~l-~1 nE Tn~N9FEn OF FUNDS TO pnOVIDE nUDGET Fan fY-OO-Ol TO nrERATp. COLLIr.n COUNTY r.~F.Rr,r.NCY MP.DICAL f,EnVIC~ - J\DOPTED IN TIlE ^~OIJ'IT OF' $Slli ,C)I)t\ '" ~ FisCAl Officcr }I,Ho1d L. !tall cxplllined th..tt lit the Ace moeting of March 2~, 1981, the subject of proviñing êI buñ~et to operate the Collier County F.mer~cncy Meñicnl Services was approved, anò he WêlS to bring hack the ðppropriDte Budget ^men~ment transferring $5l~.99~ in ",:-..,~ .-..~ .~ c'fJ ,~, ~1 ðccordnncc with ßOl1rd instruction. Commissioner Kruse ~oved, seconded hy CommtsAioner Wimer IInd carried unanimously, thnt Bunget Amennment 81-~3 transferring funds to provide a hudget for the balance of FY 80-81 to operate Collier County EMS be adopted in the amount of $5l6,99~. " .' "', ~OOK 060 PACE 481 PlH]e ~9 i 1 ·~tr.' "~~)t ~,.J' . ';~~. .~\ " ..,~ :j;.' ';:~ ~, ·:'í '~ "'1 BCO~ 060 rAcE400 MrHCh 31, l!)nl - "" . nUDG~T AMENDM~NT nl-~4 nE TRANSFER OF Nr::¡::ORD FOR PUnCIIA:'R OF nrr.\.¡nI'l'¡m prm ^f)OPTP."> TN T!lF: "MOUNT íJP ~l(n .. .~- .. , FIJ!\ID::ì TO rnOVITìp. M)[,)ITIO~7\L ~ONEY 1\(;:1 Ir.lIL'I'URr.-!!O"l¡;: Er.ONO·.uCf. - . r.ommissioncr ~iMer movc~, seconded hy Co~missloner Arown and carried ~/l, with Commissioner Kruso opposed, thnt nud~ct Amendmcnt Ol-r,~ transF.erring fun~s to provide additional funds to the 7\gricul- ture-Home Economics Dcpnrtmcnt for the purchase of a typewritcr he ~dortcd in the amount of: ~l~l. , >.. .' . ~~~~ PlIge 50 ,}~ ' ..~11... ,~ ~. I:;~ "i~ .j; , ;. -~ ' .:,1. ...~ , " ~",--~,~",".,,-_..__..... , ff']J ¡J tll'" ~ ! ~,~~;; UU ; 1 " MOK œo PACE 4Q2, . Mflrch 31, 1'Jnl OUQ~ET ^MRND~ENT nl-~5 n~ Tn^N~F~R OF PU~Dn n~ ~NG!NEEnI~~ ^DMtN. Fon INcnr.M;¡m PRINTING canTS OF' r~n"'IT nF.prHN'I'f) - ADOPTr.D IN 'I'1If. ^"10UNT OF ~1,73~ . Commiaßionor Wimcr movnd, accon~od hy Commissioner Arown nn~ cnrried ~/l, with Comminsioner Kru~e oppose~, th~t nu~get Amendment nl-~5 transfnrrin~ fundo to cover the C05t of incrense~ printlnq costs of permit reprints be ndoptnd in the amount of $1,735. Pëllle 5l . . ". '_·'_'<111 'H__________._,...",...,..,"~.,,_,.."" . ~~ t ¡ [1i ~- ... ". (* J , ....'.. [~l~:. ¡~ ~oox 060 rACE 494 Mnrch 31, 19tJl nUDGET 1\MF.:--ID"IF.NT Al-(j(i Rr. J\CCIJMTE nr.FLF.CTtO"l OF F.XrF.NDITUnF.S IN pr.n;'ONNF:r~ - M)OPTF.11 IN TJlF. A~OtJ'~T OF $? ,100 . "'-' . ... ...,.... .------........, Commissioner Wimer movcd, seconded by Comminnioncr Drown nnd carried ~!l, with Commisaioncr Kruso opposed, thnt Rudqct Amendment' Ol-~~ trDnzforrin~ fun~D to mor~ Dccurately roflect expenditures in tho Porsonnol Depnrtmcnt be ndoptad in the ðmount of $?,lOO. (,; ~): , . . ~'~ . ".t ""':' ~~), ',0" . -'~ P.1tJO 52 . .:. ...,,'..,...,,"....,.,.¡...~'''''_.,,''-',.......~~....,...,~"_.__._.....~,._'" T . --""""......,..-..,~,.._--"-;""'._"'-.;'.,',,,..;._....""..,-,-=......,-,~,,...,,,.....,."~"""-,_..,...~,..,."'.,,';;.'."-"'......,,..- "" MO~ 060 rAGE400 Mt\rcn 31, l!'Hll nUDGET ^'4p.NnMJ::NT f\1-r;7 RE MOTO~ 'IF.:!lICLE INsrr.CTH)N OVF.I1TI"'E "NO IN- I!OtJ~r. F;0.lIl N1r.N'r !)lmVICINr. ¡:;XPENOITUI1f,5 - AD~PT¡:;f') ¡t-.! Tilt:: A"101NT OF' $ 1 ,'-' 0 () . >..__.q~---_..'-'" '. .-. r '" Comrninsioner Wimer moved, ßDcondod hy ComrnisBioncr "rown ðnd carried ~/1, with Commis~ionnr KruGo oppOGcd, thAt AU~1et Amendment £\1-li7 tr/)n~(l')rrin'J (\Inns (or cost of ~10tor Vehicle Inspection ovortimc Ðnd in-hou~D equipmcnt 5crvicing expenditurcs be adopted in the amount of ~l,I)()O. 1"'<1(]0 '13 " .1. "_""~'_''''~'"~';;'''''O+'''_'-_'___ ..-...--..- Il'J1 lì~'~ ~ ;.:f·~·f" i í ~ 1;1 i:.. ' ~ f , . , MOX 060 rACE 4Ð8 Ml'Irch :11, 191'11 ßtmGt::T 1\"lr.ND'1F:NT 0 l-'in m: 1\CctlR^Tr~ nr::Fr.ECTION OF r.XPF."IDITIJI1r.!3 IN COUNT\' ¡'11\NM';F:I1-^OMIN. - ^DOPTP,O IN TIH: ^"IOIJNT ()::' !; t ,1nr, r .-.- Commissioner Wimcr movc~, seconded by CommisDioner Brown ðnd C1Hricd "/1, with Commis!1ioncr f{rl1lHJ OPPO!1or.1, t.hat: nudget ^,nonc1ment Sl-~O trnnsferrin0 fun~5 to ~ccuratcly reElect oxpenditurcs in County ~^n~gcr-^~min. fun~ be l'I~optcd in the nmount of Sl,ln~. P"'Jc 54 . . ", J BOOK 06 ø PACE 500 /o1<1rch 31, 19f1t ßUDGET AM~~nMENT nl-~9 nE TRAN~Fr.n OF FU~D~ ~on ~nLtn W^RTE ~Xr~Nf>~~ ~T N^PL~~ TnA~nF~n ~ITr., L~A~~~ N8GOTIATEn, ~0!JrPM~NT nn~^~oow~, ^NO J\CCiJr1^TP. nF.f'r.r::~TTn~ Of' ~Xf"P.NOtTII1U~~ - ADf)T'Tr.n TN T'IP. "~n1JNT or $~t), 7'37 Î .. 'lrn'" Comminnioncr Wimer movn~, ~~con~cd by Commissioncr Rrown ðnd c~rriarl ~/l, with Commissioner Krusc oprosc~, that nudgct ^mendmcnt ~l-~0 trnnsferrin0 run~s for Solid Waste expnnses At Nnples Trðnsfcr Site, lensos nogotiaterl, equipment hrcðk~own, And ~ccurntQ rcflection or oxpp.nr1itlJrer; he lIdopted in the 11:"10unt of ~,'i<),737. 1""'90 55 , ,~ '." ,.~,:~ ". .'"\ ':~ ,~ .'~ ..~~ " ~t ~\ : ' . ~ 0' M{lrch 31, 1901 BUDGET AMP.~DMP.NT 81-70 nr. ACCUn^Tp. nEFLp.CTION OF r.XPENDITunr.~ FOR MUf,P.UM - ADOPTr.ry IN ^MOU~T OF S350 ... . - - . - .---,.- Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried ~/1, with Commissioner Kruse opposed, that Bud~ct Amendment 8l-70 trnnsferring funds to more accurato1y reflect expendituros for the Museu~ be adopted in the amount of $350. BOOK 000 rACE 503 PlHJO 51) I J , ,'-;1 J '\ f, ì -~ .t,f"* :1,~ '~ ·"1 :.'~..'.. :"~~~' : "'t¡: J.'., "'~ ' ";i,~ ., .' , . 'J' 'I March 3l, 19n1 nUDGr::T AMF:'~D~mNT '11-71 RP. TnAN!jF'Ert OF FU~-mr; Fon PlInCIIMF. OF SF.LF-pno- pF:r.LED Clmß p^VF.n FOn 1JSF: IN Tn^Nf;POnTI\TION-nOI\D SF:CTION - ADOPTED IN .l\MOUNT OX $5.,,000 _____...____. . . ... . . , . , . . ... . Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, thfit Budget Amendment 01-71 trllnsF.erring f.unds to provide for purch~se of n self-propolled curb p^ver for use in construction of roadway Improvements be adopted in the amount of $5,000. BOOK 060 PACE 505 PI190 57 ... " ~. .. " i . " "." . < .. ~""~.<.<. - .'1'''''-'''''" "".<.. ··e,,,,,, ·0....;·"....·,'..;, """^"",,.. __··,,"'·...,...~,,~_u...,...,"-'.. .;¡¡,_""~-"'.;;"""'..-..~...",..."~..""...""''';_''".....,..;~.....'''..,,...''''..._."'"~"." '"''_''".n''';''' >, "',.. _'. _',' .. ."_",_.,...,"",,. ""'" ..P."".,,"',, ',.". c '~4" j , .... . . ···t¡; 'cO J .,t: :~ (;~ ....'.'.~~'. .>* ., ;'OJ ':ilt .~ Mnrch 31, 1931 BUDGET J\ME~DMENT Rl-7? rtr. TrtI\NRFr.n or r\l~I)R FOR CONTTt"C':T EXP~~NDITunr.R Fon Tt"DIO EQUIP~ENT REEPAIn IN Trt"NSPORiATION ~ ðDOPTED IN "MOUNT 0' $l,035 -- 1 .. ----....-.---. -.-~- Commissioner Wimer moved, secon~cd by Commissioncr Wenzcl Ðnd carrieã unanimously, that nudgct Amcnd~ent 8l-7? tr~nsferring funrls to provide for contract expcn~itures for repair of rndio ~quipment in the . ~~ Transportation Department he adopted in the ðmount of Sl,03~. . . ~/ ~: ; BOOK OOJ PACE 507 Page SR ,. i '._~'-,¡""._-....".<"""".',;~,,-,,"",.,-~--~ ~ ~ March 31, 19111 BUDC~T J\~END~ENT Rl-73 TO ACCURJ\Tr.LY n~FL~CT PL~NNING DEPT. EXPENDI- TUnr.~ - ADOPTr.D IN TII~ AÞ.\OIlNT or. 1':I;,0?5 ."- . ~ . , -- -.... Comminsioncr Wimcr moved, seconded by Commissioner ristor ~nd carried unnnirnously, that Budget Admenòment Al-73 transferring funds to ~ccuratcly reflect exponditures in the Planning Depnrtment be adopte~ in the Ðmount of $~,O?5. ., I ... (\1 'I" (.._t,· . ßOOK 060 PAGE 509 l'ngo 59 ~r _ i . ·1 r .1 \~l' . '. I .i}~ IS. ï':~' .....¡. . !¥ ., : :~~:" .j~ k. ;~~.. . ~Jt;, ;,~ . ~ '. ";;O>k .t;,:~ 'þ :{~ :;,. . ~"~ì' H·,·i ;)~ ',- I .'J.,,",4.~ Mi\rch 11, ltJnl RlJDr.ET ^MF.~D~P.NT ßl-74 np. TnI\Nf>Fr.n OF FU~D~ Tn I\PPRnrRtI\Tp. ADDITIONAL rl::!'JER1\L I\Nn ST1\TP. CRMIT Ft~·ms ^"D ..,onl:: ACCUnI\TF:L\' nr::FLF.CT EXPF.NDITUfU:S Fon ~"ITNF:SS M'''I<;T1\''C:F. P!10~n1\'" -~D")r>Tr::1) IN T!!F: AW)1JNT OF $1,A(')n r . Commissioncr Wimer moved, second cd by Commissioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, that ßudqet Amenñment nl-7~ tri\nsferring funds to appropriate additional Federal nnd State Grant funds, to allow local match, and to more accurately reflect cxpenditures for the Witness Assistance r>roqrñm he ndopted in the amount of $3,~OO. BOOK 060 rACE 511 PDq e Ii n i j I i ...~ ',,",. '''''"'-"''"''-''''-;~'''~'' ~'~~ , )<'-""-$I"" F_. "'.... '"~' . :' "",,^¡ "'l'Irch 31, 19n1 .,1 . <;¡ .;ï: . :~¡ ßtJDGF.:T ",.,r,NDMF:NT A1-75 RE TMNSF'F:R Of' ¡;'UN!')!ì TO "PPMPI1IJ\TE ON~ I1J\LF Tnl:: CONFI~C"TF:!,) PROPEI1TY ^~ SPF:CIFIF.:D BY COURT ORDF.:R RPo 5TJ\TP. T\TTOI1NEY J\DOPTF:I) IN TIIF: M"()ur~T or $12,-1"!' . .. Commissionor ~imer movod, soconðc~ by Comminsioner Wcnzel and 1_4 '," carried unanimously, that Rudgct "mendment 01-75 transferring funds to appropriate onÐ half of the confiscated property ~s specified hy Court Order in CDse No. RI-0173-CA-OIO-CR, be adopted in the amount of $12,1-10. 'BOOK œo rACE 51.3 rag" 'il I "~i~; -~~:~~ "'., ,."--,,,,--.,~_.,-, ,...,-..... NlIrch 3l, llJnl BUDCET J\~P.NDM~NT 01-76 RE TRJ\NSFEn FROM CONTINGP.NCIP.G TO PROVIOP. FOR INCnp.1\Sr.o PIIONE CALLS F'no'1 STOCKADE RP. PUBLIC DF:F'F:NDP.R - J\DCPTEO IN THF. M"IOIJNT OF $1, snn · -- ---...-- -.. - - t' Commissioner \1imer moved, secon~ed hy Commissioner Wenzel Ðnd carried ,unllnimously, that Auclget 1\mendment Bl-71'i, tr£msferring funds from Contin~encics to provide for increl\se~ cost of collect calls from the Stocknåc to the Public Defenåer's Office he adopted in the amount of Sl,SOO. . BOOK 060 rACE 515 Page "2 .. i ,.,',...,."""';....,."""'...,._,--,,_..""'._-- 'I ....... II .. .. ..."',--"".,-""'..''''.._---,~_....~~. . 1 ,t , " f ~ , ~ i 'd, "~ S~ .~~;, ::~~. :':'..;¡ . }',.<..: ;'·1 ¡, , J, ~". ,I, . , .'J. '...o' :.; ~, .}:; (". ~ ~ '1:1'·' ../ ': ...: \ ~. :t,: .~¡ M/'Irch 3l, 19"1 nuo~r.T ~MENDMr.NT 01-77 RP. Tn~N~Fr.n OF fIJND~ Fon COST OF rnIV~TE TF.LE- PHOIH: LINF. fiE CIRCIJIT counT JUDGE C7\RLTON - flDorTED IN TilE "MOUNT OF $300 . .~...,...........-..~. Commissioner Wimcr moved, scconded by CommiGsion~r Wenz6l and carried unanimously, that Budget Amenòment Al-77 trélnsf.orring funds to provide for the cost of a privntc telephone line, not included in original hudget for Circuit Court Judge Carlton, be éldoptod in the lImount of $300. '~OOK 060 PACE517 rllqc f;3 i -" L March Jl, l!)fll . '-( . ßUDG~T AME~DMENT fll-7R nE TR^~SF~n OF FUNDS FOn ~EnVICER OF MOTOn YEHICLE IN5pr.ctpn TN IMMOI<AT.EE - J\DOPTED IN TilE ^"IO'Jwr OF' $1,500 Commissioner Wimcr movo~, socon~cd hy Commissioner Wenzel ðn~ carried unanimously, that nud~et Amendment Ol-78 transferrin~ f.unds to provide for services of ð Motor Vehicle Inspector in Immokalee used on ;. '\ .~ :1; an emergency hasis, since the loss of one supervisor ðnd illn~ss of replacoment supp.rvisor ñepleted funds normally sufficicnt for cntire fiscal year, he ðdopted in the amount of $1,500. BOOK 060 PACE 519 Page (}01 :.1 i ..>~~'.".·.:.I'.' " ~- .¢.~ '~;.' __,.__,__."'_'___ w ..'''^'''..¡.,..... .U#/I/'""....... " ,j 1 , ..I " I March 3l, 19"1 , :-/;; ..~ A~'¡.' , ~. '..... .~~ nUDr.F:T AMr.NDMr.NT R l-79 m:: TMNfiFF.11 OF FIJt,/05 rm fiUPEI1VISOI1 OF r.LECTIONfi' OFFICE CHANe: Ef., EQU I PM r."IT fl}m 1\D!H T'I ONAL ~"L",RY - J\DOPTr.D IN TH E: A"10UNT OF $2?',01)') ... . Comnissioner Wimer moved, seconded hy Commissioner Wenzel and carried unðnimous1y, thðt Budget Amendment 8l-71) trnnsferring funds to cover fiupervisor of Elections' office ch~n~es, equipment ðnd additional salary he adopted in the ðmount of. $22,09(¡. .. MOK 060 rACE 521 Page C;S . ,. ...,r¡ !~ ~ ';'..I~' .' ~}~..'< ".",' '.~~';." ..... ~, '"~. '. .'. .-,~",. , . . . ......... : :r·~· '''.'7'~1'~~~~-~' " .,. . /iJ ';~~ '11:,'.'. ')I ¡l " ..., . '. . :,:\; . .,.J: . '.~' ~ -, . '( .. "'·'_'_~'>->A<.,,~,.,,__,,___'1"" _'r T _...,.._..,"'''~''^ -...."....,.,.--.,.....-.........,"'.--"""-.,-.-,..... .. . ~~.'''''' . " ',. . Mnrch 31, IlJnl BUDGET AME~DMENT Ol-RO RE TR^NSFER OF FUNDS FOR 7.0NtN~ TEcn/DRAFTSM1\N POs-tTTO~ TO Pr.'\NNT~r, Dr-PT. - ~DOPTF:f) 1"1 TI1F: AMOUNT OF $7,9fi" f .,I!'J; J;'¡ .(:. ,~....; :'J Commissioner Wenzel moverl, seconðeð by Commissioner Kruso ðnd . I .. '~~ cnrrierl un~nimously thnt ßurtgct Amendment ßI-RO transferring funds to Departmcnt he adopted in the ~mount of $7,9?R. provide for tr~nsfcr of 7.oning Tcch/Dr~ftsmnn position to Plðnnin~ .. ~OOj( 060 rACE 528 ........II. ....., .~..."'~... . ... .... . ":'.. ~ ,.... ..... r -'" -."..~. - , -,-.., , :1 ..: ;. .....,..,'~ "... , ., j '~ '.'1:':; '.' ..J..~'~..-----. -'-""~.' "_.'...~.'..' .. ~ . . f. . '., . '. ..,'. It . ( '- . l':! , . f'\ .:>;' ".. Page 61) --..---.,...-..""'..."...-...,-....--..--.-....-- r , i , I .Li . ... - -..... . Mnrch 31, 19R1 J . !!.~~ TRANSrF:n OF rtl'm!; TO rnOVIDF: PII'lStC~r. DflMAr:F: A'Jf) LIA'HLIT'l INr;URJ\NCE PLUS WORKßM^NR COMPENSATION COV8RA~E FOR AMnIJL~NCr. E~PLOYEE3 Fon 5 DAYS UNTIL ~OUNTY ASSUMES F:~~ RESPONSIRILITY, ~"nJECT TO COUNTY ATTORNF:Y l\pprHWMJ - l\IIT'!OTU7.F:D; M~E'HCflN ~MRIJL.~Nr;F: TO I1EI"1RtJnfiP' C()tJ'ITY ~"nn ... Î Commissioncr Wenzel moved, seconded hy Commissioner Wimcr end carried "/1, with Commissioner Rro\~n opposed, thnt the Bo~rd authorize the transfer of funds necessary to provide physical dnmngc and liability insurnnce, plus Workmnns Compensation cover~ge, (or emhulnnce employees for 5 days until the County assumes Emergency Medical Service responsibility, subject to the County Attorney's approval, and that J\merican flmbulance reimhurse the County for $"00. "PPOINTMENT OF MR. GflRY L. TICE AS ~LTF:RN^TE ~EMßER TO THE LIBRARY ADVISORY RO~nD - APPROVF:D - Following discussion during which the point was made that no person from District '3 suhmitted a resume, Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner ~imer and carried unl1nimously, thl1t Mr. ~~ry L. Tice be appointed as a regular member of the Library Advisory R08rd for an indefinite period of time. AUTIIORI7.ATION OF STJ\PF AND COMMISSIONER ^TTENDANC8 FOR "PRIL 22-"", l<JRl HIIRRIC^NP. I1A7.ARrJ CONFF:RENCE ~T ST. PETr.!\SR(JR~, FLORI!")A - APPROVED ... Chairmnn Pistor explainerl the letter that he received from Governor Bob Grélham regnrding the third nnnunl Nntionn1 Hurricane Conference to be held April 22-2", 1981, a, St. petersburg, Floridn, in which the Governor suggnsts that Collier County have representative BOOK 060 rACE 525 Page ()7 .. .......- .. ......h;.~ .._... . ...... '" . f . ~ \ .¡ ! ..'''......,.. . ''','''.' ' '" ( " f'"<l""'__~ J ,. " ,\.:',û. BO~K 060 PACE526 Morch 3l, 19tH . ,. ,- attp.ndance. County Mnn~~or Normon responded to Ch~irmðn pistor by snyin~ thnt he was aware of the Conf.erence ond had staff in mind who , , · miCJht he élhle to élttend. Commissioner wimer move~, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carricd unnnimously, that stüff l1nd any Commissioners who wish to attcnd the April 7.2-2-1,1981 !\urricane 11é1zard Conference to be held at St. Petersburg, Floriòa be ùuthorized. C!\.~!nM'/\N IIU'\'!l0RI7.ED TO DRAFT LETTr.n TO RII!1P.AU OF OIS,/\STP.R PRF:PAREDNE5S nF: IN0t1LnY ,/\S TO COST FOn !lOUSING ADDITION,/\L PE0PLF: IN THE EVENT OF NIJCLr::,/\n ,/\TT,/\CV, . Chairman pistor explained that he has received copies of letters from other COLlnty ürlministrõtions to the Rurcélu of. Disùster Prepared- ness, re9õrdin~ the recent presentation before the Board hy Mr. Buchanan fro~ said Rurenu, which outlined County põrticipütion in the cvent of a nuclear attaCK. After discussion Co~missioner Wcnzel moved, seconded by Comnissioner Wimer ü~d célrricd unünimously, that the Chairmnn be authorized to draft a letter to the 8ureau of Disaster Preparedncss cxprcssing the ßoard's concern at the ßurenu's intention of Collier County housing so müny people ûnd inquiring about what funds would covcr the cost of such an operûtion. Chairman pistor noted that a rcply r~port hnd heon requestcd by SeptcMber 1, lryOl. Pc'lCJe I}A ....-.--...." ,. Mnrch 31, 1!'1t'll ^TTENDANC~ OF COMMI~SIONF.nS TO ?'-ND J\NNU~L PL^NNINr. ^ND 7.0NtN~ CONFSRr::NCF., MAY r; TIlIìOUr.1I n, 1<:11'11, IN Tl\~\P^, FLORIOA AND FIJTIJRE CONFEIìF.W:r::S TlIlìOUGIIOUT Till:: 'fEAR, ^T TIIF. CO"1"1ISSIONERS' DISCTìF:TIOH - AtlTQOR 17. r::n Chairm~n pistor rend from a roccnt1y rcceive~ brochure describing the '-2nd Annual Plannin~ ôn~ 7.oning Confcrcncc to he held at Florida Internation~l University, TaMpa, Florida, ~AY ~ throu~h A, 19n1. After a short discussion, CommiRsioner Wimer movc~, secon~ed hy Commissioner Bro~m anò cùrried unônimously, that the lìoarcJ Duthorize the ôttendônce at this conference and others to be held throuqhout the year, at the Commissioners' di3cretion. J\cCEPTANCr:: OF MIìS. F:LINOR WENZEL'~ Rr::SIGN^TION FROM PELICAN RAY ROARD OF SUPERVISORS . "7 Chairman Pistor road Mrs. Elinor Wenzel's letter of resi~natian from the Pelican Bay Board of Supervisors effective "1arch 25, 19~1, due to the fact that she feels there are sufficient persons livin~ in Pelican Ray who would be Able to servo in this côpacity. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded hy Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously, to accept Mrs. Wenzel's resignation from the Pelican Bùy Bo~rd of ~upervisors, with thanks an~.appreciation. !'1ISCF:LLl\NF:OtJS conR¡:;SPO"l!')SNC¡:; - FILP.D I\No/nn np.FF:rmp'f). There being no objection, the Chair directed thõt the following correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated: BOOK OB 0 PACE ~ Page 69 ~.~ ,~,..' . -....I..··--~,...·..- -~...~;,¡.- . ... '.,;-1 ~f -.?" '" . ,r.· . "; (;' . . . " ...'. . , . ;~, . " ~,' '" " r ~, , --- BOOK 060 fACE 528 Mnrch 31, 19n1 1. Letter d~ted 3/10/'11 from Thorn!! Hollister ðnr'! Darrell nùnie1s opposinlJ FOPO 01-V-2 (Public lIearing <1/7/f1l). xc Plannin~ and Zoninl) Depts. 2. L~tter ~Llte( 3/l6/fll from Dept. of Community Affairs ndvlsing thùt tho Dept. has postponcr'! further processlnl) of applica- tions ro !lun 701 Progrc"lm. xc Planning ùnd County Mnnager. 3. Letter received <1/1/01 from Walter M. and Louise H. Timmerman supportinlJ "Marco Clean-Up" progrùm. xc County Manager LInd County r.nlJineer. <1. Copy of lettcr dnted 3/7.3/81 from ~ast Naples Civic ^ssoci- ation, Inc. requestin~ that tax ñollars he sp~nt to oppose thc proposed Charter. ~. Lottcr r'!atcd 1/7.~/n1 from ~s. Kay Steigerwald, Collier County Mcnti1l IIea1th Clinic, Inc. urging the Roarc'l to support Community CAre for the ~lderly. xc. Martha Skinner. ~. Letter dated 3/7.5/81 from Director Paul F. White, Meals on Wheels, Gt. Vincent OePaul Society, urging the nOc"lrd to support the Community Care for the Elñerly Program. xc. Mõrtha Skinner. 7. Copy of letter r'!ated l/7.~/Rl from Director Richarc'l F. Joder, Lihrary, to 1-1rs. ¡¡elen Green, reg,'H(1ing termination of mobile library service. R. Letter c'lated 3/l~/Rl f.rom Sec. neatrice R. ßa1len, Collicr County Council on Aging, Inc. opposing termination of mobile lihrary service. xc County Manager and Mr. Joder. 9. Letter ñõted 3/19/01 fro~ Otus K. ^lbright with several rccommenñations re building plans õn~ suggesting that the County staff LInd fire departments jointly make fire code building inspections. xc Mr. Virta and Mr. Scamehorn. 10. Lettcr dated 3/19/81 from w. C. Schroeder, General Contrac- tor, regðrding length of time for inspectio~s and permits. xc Mr. Normand and Mr. :'cùmehorn. 11. Letter ñater'! 3//.~/nl from ~r. C. Evòns, Qeltona Corporation, regarding need for additional staff and increased pay for buildinlJ inspectors. xc Mr. Norman and Mr. Scamehorn. I?. Letter dated 3/7.5/81 [rom Bob. L. Lundstrom, rres., Sunbrella Homes, Inc. re insufficient number of inspectors and low pay scale Ðnd delays in obtùinin0 permits. xc Mr. Norman and Mr. S'camehorn. .'~ í' ..,~. P,1<JO 70 ," :, ,. ..',. -.... .., .~::;.. ~.;~ "'·'·'i·.r..· .':\' ·fl, 1\':'1 7i i -_....... ",) :~ n ~ f :~\. .,... I; '., '." ! I ; .1 J . .....-.*. .. March 31, 1981 . , ····nECr.ss: 2:15 P.M. , I -'I nECONVENED: 2:25 P.M..... l\nCIIITF.:CT/F.NGINF.:P.RINC CONSIJLTI\NTS' INTP.RVIEI'¡S nr. COUNTY r.XPMISION - II..J. nOSf,/Tl1E r.IIREN1mI\NT7. r.nOIJP f,F.LEC1'P.D AS NO. 1 CI101:Cr. Mr. I"i 11 iD1'1 R. ~cNel'!l, project MAnager, Polizzi/lleary, Qxpl1)ine~ to the COlnmissioners that the followin<) four Architect ci1ndicJates from the selection proc0"" were present to provide intervIews with regard to the Collier County Courthouse expansion prograM. 11. .J. ROSS!TI1P. F:!lnp.t.,Jt<nr..NT7. r,1l0\JP , . Mr. Arnold Gitten, Director of Development for H. J. Ross I\ssoci- ates, introduced Mr. James O. Denhi1m, president, of the firM who · expressed appreciation that the company was asked to return to give the firm's gualific~tions for consideration with regard to the County Courthouse expAnsion progrùm. lie made the followinC] points: l. H. J. noss I\ssociates has been in business in South Plorida for over 30 years. 2. Mr. Denham, AS princip~l-ln-èhargp. of his firm, would he responsible to see that the resources are assi~ned to the joint venture. 3. The r.hrenkrùntz Grou~, Architects and Criminal ~ustice Planners, would be the second part of the team, an eminently gualific;l firm to execute the project. _. 4. f,asi1k! I\ssocii1tes, Inc., who have an excellent reputation in the field of urhan planning and landscape architecture, will Dssist the firm. Mr. Denham introduced the followin<) persons who would ~ork directly on the expansion project: 1. Kl'!nneth nicc!, 1\11\, Vice-president, The r.hrenkrantz Group, Principal-In-Charge; 12 years experience in municipal and judicial projects. 2. Mr. nobert Zimmcrmðn, I\sGociAta lInd Senior Corrections Designer; to he Ptoject Mani1ger, exporienced in both st~te i1nd county complexes including municipal and judicial pro- jects. '" 6QOK 060 rACE 529 PlIgo 71 . ,~ .. ( u -- .-' ,.:.....1 . '''';-~. " f i J ~OOK 080 PACE 530 MHCh :\1, 1901 . . 3. Mr. lIenry M. 7.ihmnn, ^ssintnnt project Mnnnr¡er, whose rcnponsihility would be enqineering coordination for the project; recently performcd those services for ð Broward County library, ~n approximately ?S million dollar project. 4. Mr. George ßotner, from ~nsaki Assoc., Inc., whose most recent· experience was project director for urbnn planning and lan~scðpe architect for the Dnde County downtown Miami government center. 5. Mr. ~amuel W. Reynolda, Chief Civil En~ineer, fl. J., Ross, whose responsibilities would be all civIl engineering func- tions on the project; has had CollIer County experience as Supervising ~nginecr for two'bridges to Marco Islnnd, which II. .J. Ross designed for the Dep¡utment of Transportation. Mr. Denham described a recent project in which II. J. Ross Associ- ates and r~r. Reynolds were involved, which is the Federal Correction facility in Dade County, comprisin~ approximately a (,~ acre site, and he explained the firm's history of "tenmwork" in accompllshin~ pro- jects. He introduced Mr. Ricci, who explained the following points: 1. The combl~cd philocophy of H. J'ROSS Associates/The Ehrenkrantz Group, as the project Is approRched. 2. The manner In which the project would be accomplished, with regard to the people who actually work on snid project. 3. The process whereby the project would be constructed. Mr. Ricci s~!d thnt county governent has been the fastest growing sector \n either the private or puhlic ar~as in the last l~ years, and he noted the complex needs for the various agencies which comprise all the county structures, as well as the spccinlized needs necessary to respond to the Issue:; in criminal justice. He pointed out th~t coun- tics run jails, not prisons, with jails heing processing centers; noted that courts and litigation present special needs, with an increase at the local level in those cases; and he explained how these problems would be addressed if 11. J. Ross/The Ehrenkrûntz Group were selected. He explained what he felt W_JS ûn additionûl dimension of unique service offered by his firm, that of relating the planning and nrchitectural P1IiJe 72 i ~ -' . .:4 ;"~:~, .:"A :'¿ . .. .: 'J ., .. ~. '!s,'" ~' ~;j, II. \¡ '-f' 'e ,~..; .,,! " March 31, lCJlJl issues to policy and decision making, and that a vinhlc description of the concepts involved in the form of modp.1s, physicnl drawings, and pamphlets would he hrought to the electorate. Mr. Ricci gave a copy of the firms' proposal for the Governm~nt Center Complex to each Commissioner, cxpl~ined the or1Dnizational chart, and introduce~ Mr. Robert Zimmerman. Mr. Zimmerman exp1aineñ what his responsihilities would he as project Manager; and that he woulii have (1,1 office in close proximity to the project, in order to develop ùnd maintain communications from the eArly stages of the progrnm; that a mAster plan would develop precon- . ceptual alternatives to he analyzed with the construction mùna~ers and the Commissioners; and that efforts would he Made to minimize the disruptions of the various County operations Rnò needs during the con- struction period. lIe mentioned the importnnce of energy considerations with regarò to thc cost factor: that the firm's energy componcnt in his office would be tapped for the expertise of passive solar energy; that forecasting of inflation factors would be part of the on10in9 pro~ram; and thnt flexibility of the program would be incorporated throughout the project's progress, to he shown in the diilgrams in the early stages of the progrôm. He conclulÌcd hy stating that project cost analysis would he uplÌateå at every stù0e; development assistnnce in the refer- endum òocuments would be offered; that part of the po~t-rcferenòum work would be the development of detililed construction documents and speci- fications. He explained that his firM had worked with construction manAgers previously, and he looked forward to workin1 on the County's , Government Center Complex, if chosen. In responsp. to Commissioner Kruse's question regnrðing what construction the firm had òone in Collier County, Mr. Denham said that BOOK 060 PAGE 53{ Page 73 ,.. .---~ --- . "" .,. ., ' I rr "j;' . j ':I~, .". ~ ii~':' ¡ ¡l' ..~~ Wi ': I!U ¡ ..... .' ~ ,BOOK 060 PACE 5S2 M<1rch 31, 19A1 his firm rccently completod three highrise buildings on M~rco Island for tho Power Corporation, hOßi~es the proviously mcntioned hridges to Marco Island. Mr. Denham explained that II. .1. Ross r\!'sociates' main , office is loc~ted in Miami, Florida; thnt The Ehrcnkrantz Group's office is in New York; and that the Sasaki Associate~' office is in Miami. In the short discussion which followed, the locations of several projects recently completed by II. ~. Ross Associates wero explained, i.e. the Dade County Women's Detention Center, and n county jail facility currently under construction in rinellas County. Commissioner wimer pointeò out the need for n bond issue, which would be supported by the public, to cover the cost of the proposed construction program, and he asked how the firms would take ðn active part in the leadership, selling role. The point was made that the firms' participation would be in terms of projecting physical solutions to the needs, but ~r. Ricci said the decision would hnve to he made by the construction mana~er ~nd County Commissioners as to what part the firms would pcrform with regard to the electorate. He said the firms' role has nlwnys been of a technical nature, i.e. looking at alterna- . tives, "costing them out", doing the physical solutions, providing backup data, etc. Commissioner Wenzel asked if the firms would make up the renderings, and Mr. Ricci answered in the affirmative. He also said that the firms would identify the availahility of federal funds, and noted firms' success in obtaining money which has been Qchieved for such projects in the p~st. Commission~r Kruse asked what the expp.cteå dollar cost per square faot might he, i.e. project price rnnge. Mr. Ricci explained the possibiity of utilizing the current jail facilities in the dcsign of the new project, thereby cutting the capital cost, Qnd he said his firm paqc 7-1 '/' , ". 4.. ..._............ MlIrch 3l, 19ß1 always looks to build "on the low end" of the scale. The point was made that with team effort, a budget would he entahlished early to cover Collier County's needs and the firms' design to accomplish those needs. Mr. Gitten concluded tho precentation by stating that the people who would he proposed for the project would be workin~ full time. WJ\TSON J\ND COMP^~Y Mr. ~c~eel introduced Mr. John ßreight from ~at50n and Company, who thanked the ConMissioncrs f.or the opportunity to MAke the presentAtion, and he introduced the following persons from the Company who were present at the ~eetin~: 1. Mr. Dan arnly, Principal in the firm. 2. Mr. Chuck Schmidt, principal in the firm and ManAger of the Fort Myers office. 3. Mr. Jim Carter, Principal in the firm and Manager of the En~ineerinq Division. 4. Mr. John Silvcr, Associate and Senior Architect. Mr. Breight explalncd that Watson and Company is a Florida firm with extensive design expcricnce in jail, criminnl justice and govern- ment complex facilities. He said thc firm is pr~ud of their record of finishing the projects within the timeframe required nnd under budget. Referring to the ten qualification considerations listed on a ho~rd before the Commissioners, whjch were inclu~ed in the Board's March 24, 1981 a0enda to which the firm responded, Mr. Br~i~ht explaincd that with regard to the eighth point, Watson and Company was the one firm who made presentations lnst weeK that ha~ not joint ventured with anyone. lie said this point \"oulc1 he addressee'! as a sin~lc source responsibility. lie introduced Mr. f)éJn Harnly, President of Watson and BOOK 060 PACE 533 PélCJO 7S .. " . .-" ~. ¡II'.' . . ~', ", if" ·1 '¡..... _ru.""""__",_'''~,*,,,,,,,,,",,,__I1O«_'''''''_''''''''''''''"'''''''''_____''.t,_,,,,,,,,,_",,,,,,,,,,,,,-"""",,,,,,~'.,,,,", , t./ ~"~"'. <." it~ ~ . ,..', ~jJ f~~~t. , .~.,.,~'" .,'~' , ..~~? >..''1-1" '.~~ '.,,r. 'i>;.~ ') i'.\.' ,''':~~! ,~~ .......-- . ~. ...,."......- .- ._>< --T .-~- ~ ~; _.447 -=- .-. .. ""--~- .~.. .41-_':':" ~ ~ ~ .............'I~:J~. I~ lr..r..~..~~~ d!:T~'¡t:"..L..ñ~ ~ ,{... ....~~~~.......~ 11~~.J1I:I.::r phased construction, j .e. Lcly IJIgh School, é\nd t.he )r. st.ory, FIrst Financiëll Tower, in Tëlmpa. IIc Qxpl,dned his pcrsonal credcntial!; with rcgard to construction cxperience. lie introduceñ Mr. Jim Carter. Mr. Jim Carter, r.n~ineerin~ Division M~nager, explaincd that his firm is ð full service architecture/engineering firm which me~ns that all the cxpertise of the major disciplines, which are required to "put . together" a project of the mÐ~nitude of the County Govcrnment Center Complex, such as mechanical, electrical, civil, ùnd structural are in-house at Watson and Compëlny. He described the company's experience with environmental considerations, which have hecomp. more important in recent yeôrs in the planning and site development for such a project. ~'r. Schmiclt explained why his firm thinks that hùvin<:1 all services in-hous0 offers a single source to "go hack to", and he said that was the prim~ry reason that Watson Dnd Company decided not to form any kind of untried, joint venture, because the firm feels it can adequately and morc effcctively servc Collier County with such a single point of responsibility. Distributing a RUnGET VS. BIDS list, Mr. Schmidt cxplained the Compëlny feels strongly ôbout staying within agreed budgets, and he briefly described the Company's post-construction followup procedures. Mr. D"n lIarnly concluclcd the presentDtion by stating that his Company applauds the County's foresight in bringing II qualified, competent construction mëlnager "on hoard" early in the project, and he said the Compëlny believes it can commit to the County certain savings BOOK 060 PACE 535 Page 77 ~. . ,./. ," :~ ',; .' ~ ;' .'~-'--~' .-., '-\"~}LI¿ ~r.. "J" 1"! ..-! .' . ""'-_..,,-,,_.,...,"'-".-.,,"~.,,'_...,."..~""'~.""'. ;,1' f~ . J BO:¡~ 060 PACESæ Mi1rch 31, 19~1 in the fec ne~otii1tions whcn thero is ~n opportunity to discuss In dottlil with the Commissioners the con¡;trllction mc1nLtger's role and his firms, so thl1t dupl1cnto efforts would not occur. 110 thlmked tho nOllrd 1 J . 1 for the opportunity to make the foregoinCJ presentation. Commis~ioner Wimcr explained that Collier County dOfls not have the funds for construction of thc facility at the present time, and he asked what role WatÐon and Company would take to help solidify a bond issue, \~hich would need to be presenterl to the puhlic. Mr. lIarnly si'lid that his Company has become involved in fundinCJ in the past, clarified the fact that the Company works closely with f.iscal agents and that his firm understands referendum anrl revcnuo issues; and, he snid the firm's role would be primarily to give ~eneral i1dvice and assistðnce in this regard i1nd to work with the [iocI'I1 i10cnts chosen. When Chairman Pistor questioned what Watson and Company's actual experience Wi1S with reCJi1rd to the firm not doing the construction rnantlCJement itself, Mr. Harnly descrihed the training camp which his firm did f.or the ~amr(1 Bay ßuccaneers, at St. PetersburCJ and which had a construction rnani1ger. . Mr. Jim Carter described the construction which has just begun at Tampa National ^Irport, approximðtely l5 million dollars project, another construction management project in which Watson and Company arc engi1'Jed. Ch~irman ristor said he hðd looked into SOMe of the Fort Myers construction and questioned why there were problems with construction heginning for the court and jail facilities there. Mr. lI~rnly briefly described thc various factors which have resulted in deli1Ys, one of which Is the process of. the formation of a non-profit corporation to own the huilding flnd to build it with industrial rcvenue honds and f'c'lge 7n . :. T' _""_liT ,,""'1'110" "'""'--'-"~"".'~"'~--""-'.""'~""""""'~","'"' ... 'i'fj'l :t.. ,; J '>.111· '~l' :5', 1:1" " ~ uiì ~ ~ _4 MlIrch 1l, 1901 long-term lcasc it h~ck to tho county, which, he Qxpl~ine~, is Ð vcry complico'ltcd process to initiate. Mr. lIarnly stAted that 99\ of the construction his firm hð5 done haG been in Floridn. Messrs. IInrnly nnr1 Breight thankcò the Commissionnr5 for tho opportunity to give their company presentl\tion and said they looke~ forward to working with tho County. W. R. FRIZZELL ~RCHITECTA . Mr. McNeel introduceò Mr. ï,eorge ßail, President of I~. R. Frizzell Architects, who explained his firm's bôckground, and he said the company is by far the largest architectural organizAtion to have its hea~quðrters and principal office in the immediate area. . lie explained thc composition of the tenm and stated that his responsibility, as principnl of this project, would be to m~~e sure thðt the pcople are availl\ble, who nrc needed to meet the County's scheòules and pcrform thc quality work cxpected. lie said that proposed project Manager Tom pinkerton has had several years experience in that capacity with a leading criminal justice firm in the country, handling both jails and prisons. He explðined that the firm's consultant, pred Powers, pre- pared the guidelines for the master plðnning of criminal justice fncilities for the Dcpartment of Justice nnd that he served years as head of ð Criminal Justice Divinion of a leading firm. Two additional consulting firms would be workin~ with his company, Mr. Bail explained, i.e. Post, ßuckley, Schuh, and Jernigan, Civil Engineering, and a cost consulting firm from Atlanta, to assist in cost control, and that all the other engineering needs would be performed "in-~ouse". Mr. Bail explðinnd the slides which were shown that demonstratod" some of the firm's projects that were currently under construction or hnve been completed, i.e. the support services building, under con- 'BOOK 060 rACE 537 raqe 79 .,,,,,,,~: ..' -, ~.. .. ....., " -¡'''!''-.--.: .....:.~.:....~...~_...........-,-.-. '. '-11' ~';"-: 'I ., ( ....__...,.._"....,."".·~."'o.w_,,__··,' -;). . ... ( ~t {.~ I:!. . . .. ...t ..} ...... . .~ ...'....! l~ {. :iíf·J·~ ~.".,::,.:~. ....*."1;.. ;0.;$' .~. :~l! í.. '.' '1.""~ Jf~·ì· . IJI~ ~ ..1, ,; ,.,..__..~..--,; J ~OQ~ 000 rACE 538 Mnrch :n, l«JOl struction, lit Lee Count Memorii1l ttospital, includin(j Administrative lInd doctors' of~iccs; Desoti1 County Jail, in ~rcll~i~ lInd the Lee County minimum security facility. He introduced Mr. Fred Powers. Mr. powers, Criminal Justice J\ssociate, continued to explain tho slides which covered projects that dcmonstrated the firm's experIence in constructing criMinal justice facilities and explaine~ those sites on \~hich he was responsible for the master pllln or was project manager, when he worked for the previously mentioned firm, i.e. a 7.39 bed, county detention and lllw enforcement center, I\.nn Arbor, ~1ichiCJan, similar to Collier County's needs. ~r. Powers introduced Mr. Tom pinkerton who would he the Project ~anager. Mr. Pinkerton explained his role with rcgard to being rcsponsibile for the day to déJY activltes of. t:1e job, and he descrihed the overall project appronch. He said thp. beginning master plan and schematic phases of the project development are crucinl and that the team is not just the construction mana~er and ~rchitect, but that the entire County staff and persons who will be using the facilites are included. For that reñson, he said his firm would propose to brinCJ II trailer on-site for th03e stages lInd nfter that phase, reacly access to the technical people would be iMportnnt. Mr. pinkcrton said his firm would then work from its office in the County, while continuing to mp.ct weekly with polizzi-Heery and bi-weekly with the County. Mr. Pinkerton explained his firm's policy re~nrdinCJ budqet control, and he said that I!anson ^ssoci~tcs would provide his firm with a line item estimllte at the end of each phase to match a<)ainGt Polizzi-lIeery's estimñtes. lie explained his firm's policy for follow throu9h upon completion of the project. lie introduced Mr. l1alph Allen. Mr. Allen explnined his position as Construction Supervisor with Pl1ge 1)0 _._---,........".".__."~".....''",.~,.'''.,_." , ""'.<JIioo'k. . . ~. . ". March 31, 19!J1 W. R. Frizzell ^~sociates, which would ent~il daily site visits, anrl he said as a resident of Collier County he would be readily availnhle at all times. lIe explõinec1 thDt the compè\ny prid(!s itself on "turn aroun~" time on shop drawings, that becomes very important to the contractor in meetin~ his schedule. Mr. Bail concluded the firm's presentation by stating that W. R. Frizzell was vcry interested in doln~ the project for the ~ounty. Since the firm would continue to "live with it" permDnently after the completion of the project, he assured the Commissioners every effort would be made by the company to "see that it w~s right". Copies of the firm's qualificDtions werc distributed to the Commissioners. Respond- inCJ to Chairman Pistor's qucstion, Mr. I"3Dil said that his firm had not worked with construction manD:]ers in the p~st, but that he saw no problcm in doinCJ so, ann he s ,11 r1 he felt from his observation that his company would hDve a very compatible arran~ement working with Polizzi-Hecry. "'''''''''''''Commissioner Brown .lef.t room: 3:35 P.M. Returned: 3:1\5 P."!."''''''''''''' In response to Commissioner wimer's qup.stiory.wlth regard to the firm's role in the procedure of funding the project, Mr. Bail said thDt the subject had not been discussed previously, but that if the County should decide to go for û bond issue, he felt thDt his firm could be Ðctively involved in presentations, as it had becn in a ~anatee County project whero a bond issue was successfully passed. lIe snid his firm could help compile the type of information which would be needed if the County pursucd obtaininCJ the funds from the Government. ßOOK 060 rACE ~g P I'lCJ 0 I) 1 "' I~"" ..... . . .,....,- ~ ....~_....- I ¡ '.J:].,.; !~þ :~;~'~ .' li~ &ïJ1 h1! J MOK 000 PACE 540 M~rch 31, 19R1 PR!NDL~, P^TRtCR ~ A~snct^T8S, tNC. . Mr. Tcd Prindle, Pre~i~ont of prindle, Patrick & ^ssociatcs, Inc. thanked the Aoard for invitin1 the ·firm to return anrt he introduced the f.ollowin~ mcmbers of the firm's team: 1. Mr. .John 110hl'Ht,who would he 1\ssocillto I\rchitect and project Mana~er for the project. ~. Mr. ~ohn M~~uinnes, who hlls ~pent 30 years in the ßurenu of prisons and 15 yenrs with Jail Inspections, Bnd the firm's consultant for the past 12 years. 3. Mr. Stan Holley, Architect with the firm for l~ years, and a mcmher of the criminal denign team. Mr. Prindle explained the Company's experience in approximately Ion projects in the field of criminal justice desiqn in the united States and ^frica. He said his firm is nationally recognized as one of the top five leading firms in the country that designs criminal justice f ù c 11 i tic san (1 the 0 n 1 yon e t h i1 t h ù S per m ù n en t 0 f f ice sin F 1 0 ri d a . He describeò the company's experience of designing eiqht county projects throughout Florida as well as one criminal justice complex, which gives the firm a working relationship of l?~ of the counties in Florida. He listed the various projects which were done in conjunction with con- struction management firms, i.e. a criminal justice facility in Cleveland, ohio. 'Ie introducerl Mr. Mc(juinnes. Mr. McGuinnes described the slides which were shown of various projects for which the company had designed, planned, and supervised construction ûlon~ with ß construction mûnaqer, i.e. Dade County Jail, Pùnama City, and the Sarasota County ~ail, situated ajacent to an existinC) Courthouse. lie stilted he joined prindle, patrick £. Associ- ates, Inc. upon retiremcnt F.rom the Federal ßureRU of Prisons becauso 75~ of the firm's work is in criminal justice fûcilities, and thnt he is involved strictly in the jail portion of the projects. After PnCo n~ '. . , .., ~ ~ I ì I I ,'1 I;J ~'(.: 7,¡,U ~. .,~ ~> :~~ dH .~ .:,~ :.~, ~~:: .-.,~¡ . ,-' :\: ~\é'lrch 31,19111 listing the various agencics that may ~ivc instruction with rcgarò to thc operation ðn~ ~esi0n of jails, Mr. Mc~uinn~s st~te~ that he fclt that those persons who "buy" these facilities should hnve more input. He explaincd the important factors which are involvcd with re~ðrrl to the design of jails, i.e. location é'lnò functionnl rolationships of various portions of. the jail; sizes of the housing units, which are , ,. 'J ',I controllcd in Florida by state law; typcs of locks used; and how many persons IoJould he necde(l to stnff the huilcHng. lie intro(luced Mr. John Hobnrt. Mr. Hob¿Ht cxplaineò thùt he IoJould be project Man<lger and \.¡ould work out of his Naples' office. ChnirmÐn pistor asked if the fr~ had experience working with construction management and ~r. Hobart nnswered in the affirmative. Commissioner Wimer ~sked what role the firm envisions to assist the County in the fundin~ of the project, and the point was made that the firm could discuss the dif.ferent parameters involve~ in funding because of the company's experience of working with various counties in that regard. Mr. McGuinness noted with rcgard to "sellin~" these projects, that the ùssistance of locnl organizations, especially the League of Women Voters, has been extremely helpful, ônd he suggested that it would be heneficial, in his estimation, to have such organiza- tions see the County's facilities and becomc aware of any existin~ problems. Copies of the firm's proposal were distributed to the Commissioners. Mr. McNeel said that the prcceeding four companies were eminently qualified firms and upon checking rcferences, he found that the major- I it.y of the f.irms \.¡ere cñpable and th<lt there were no si~nific.'nt problems nssociated with their eff.orts. County Mana~er Normðn distri- , '~J '/ .,}! ,.:.:~ ..~ ,~ -~ ...........~ . ',:'.::1 , ~.n.11i.~...:~ ,;, .. ..... ',< BOOK 060 PACEm page '13 " . "10 ..., ..~'"' ~'~, '. ....~' J>.._~."""."_"""''''''' .'0',' ...~. . ·(f··.. . ,...'~~~a ~ !t~'·r . ....., - ~ ."'. ( J &00;( 060 rACE 542 ~ I.'. '9. l~ t. .~ M"rch 31, 191\1 buted hallots ðnd commissioner Wincr explaincd the votin1 policy. Tho . followin9 worc ;hc results of the hallots: · . FInST VOTF.'FnR NO. 1 CHOICE: · ..- · 2 for, t"" tson Ðnn Comp<1ny votes 7. votes (or 11. J. Ross/The Ehrenkrantz Group 1 vote for \i. n. prizzell I\rchitects SECOND VOTE Fon NO. 1 CIlOIr.F.: 3 votcs for H. J. J1oss/The Ehrcnkrðntz Group 2 votes for W<1tson nnn Comp/'lny Commissioner wenzel movc~, seconded by ComMissioner Krus~ ~nd unanimously cnrricd, that fl. J. Ross/The F.hronkrantz Group be selected as the No. 1 choice. vnTF: FOR Nn. 7. CHOICE: 3 v 0 t e s for \,1. R' P r i z z e II Arc hit e c t s 2 votes for Watson /'Inn Company commissioner ',renzel nover:1, seconded by Commissioncr Kruse and unanimously carried, that ~·1. R. Frizzell ^rchitects be selectt!d as the No. /. cho i c ß . VOT8 Fon N0. 3 C40ICf.: 3 votes for Watson and Company 2 votes for prindlc, Patrick ~ J\ssocintes, Inc. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconden by Commissionor Kruse and carrion unanimously, thnt Watson ônd Compnny be selected as the No.3 choice. DI5CUSßION REGl\RDING PUALICI\TION OF DF.LINQUENT Tl\X LIST IN LUC1\L N¡::'~rSPl\PF.J1S; CO!JN'rY l\TTnJ1NF.Y PI\fF.STI~7\TPlr. SITIJ7\TI()N ~ - County Attornoý pickworth explained a situation regardin~ the publicntion of the delinquent tax list in the locnl papers, ann he said Pn/"e 1\4 " "\nrch :\1, l~lIl thnt Gince 1975, the ßonr~ hnn hnnicnlly [ollowc~ ^ rot~t1n~ pattern with thc J\dmlnl~trntive ~i~c to tho "oArd qivin9 tho "oord 0 rcminder in FebruAry Dnd the BODr~ lIon sclocted n newspapor to puhll~h snid list. This year, since there WDI> a new ~:lMinl!>trntive 1\lr1 to the noorel ðnd n now Tax Collector who WDB not Bwaro of tho preccodin~ policy, no selection wns made hy the noard. Followinq the rule that if tho nonrd docs not mDke n selection, the ToY. Collector is allowed to select, Mr. Carlton selected the NDples Daily News, which publiAhc~ the list last year. Mr. pickworth said that he wonted the Commissioners to be awaro of the situation ðnd that he \oIould invcsti~ñte the matter. 4 commissioncr wimer briefly explained the previous State LegPsln- ture ruling that the weekly publications could not publish the delin- quent tax rollG; it hncl to be clone hy a r1¡:lily ncwnpëJper. lie noted that after lobbying by the I-Ieekly publicaton5, the Stðte Legislélture this past ycar changcd the law so that the \~ee!<.l y publicðtions coulð publish 5£11<'1 lists. There beinry no further husiness [or the good of the County, tho meeting WDS acljourned by orcler of the Chnir ðt ~:?O r.~. , Q~ Xu J\'r~'!:i'd:~ 0/ WJ1.~.Ü .J( }'{r(br,7\N, CLr.f'{'< :J':' ~ '. .'/~ .. : ~.{7JA·'T-Z.~~··.{Z~ -:: ", .~::"'~- /' "Ú~'¡';1J~Y} , /,~ '. .'. ' . t I "",., . .. " " ' Ro~nD OF COUNTY CO~~I5SIONr.nS/ EX OFFICIO GOvr.n~tN~ R07\f'{O(S) OF srr.CI7\L OISTf'{ICTS UNnr.R ITS CONTf'{.O}... 0 ('J //~-r . ~ G1' ,,(J¡~ ,,---- _._-_._~....- - - ' .- -" John "\ piator, Chi:\irmnn / ßOOK 060 PACE54.3 ' .I