Agenda 05/10/2011 Item #10E
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board approve a Change Order to facilitate Staff's continued efforts to
complete the 1-75 Interchange Justification Report (I.IR). (Fiscal Impact $125,110)
OBJECTIVE: To request the Board's approval for a Change Order to facilitate Staffs
continued efforts to complete the 1-75 Interchange IJR. Project 60060. Fiscal Impact
$125,110.
CONSIDERATIONS: On January 15, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners
approved Item #16B12, contract 08-5006 with Aim Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
(AIM) for the 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard Interchange Justification Report (IJR), in
the amount of $639,819.50. Due to extensive additional modeling requirements
imposed by Federal Highway Administration and challenges by environmental agencies
the project has been delayed.
The general objective of the IJR is to document the needs of the community and to
provide statistical information necessary for the Florida Department of Transportation
(FOOT) to determine the required improvements to the transportation facility. FOOT
requires that new interchanges on Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) limited
access facilities be minimized and therefore any proposed interchanges must follow the
process, analysis and documentation requirements of FOOTs Interchange Justification
Procedure.
In 2007 Staff and its consultant Kimley-Horn drafted the first version of the
Memorandum Letter of Understanding (MLOU) to be submitted to the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) for approval. This process continued with the County's new
consultant AIM, and in May of 2008 Collier County received the 1st MLOU signed by
FHWA.
Traffic modeling work commenced and continued throughout 2008 and in January 2009
the project data was entered into the online interagency review process (used as a tool
for all reviewing agencies to review and comment on projects in the planning stages)
known as Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM). Successful completion of
the ETDM process, along with the Project Development and Environmental (PD&E)
process and the IJR is required for compliance with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), Federal law and Executive Orders, applicable Federal regulations included
in the FHWA Federal-Aid Policy Guide, and applicable State laws and regulations.
The project, once available through ETDM, generated strong environmental opposition
and concerns about the impacts of the project on the environment and endangered
species. In August 2009, a Dispute Resolution process commenced which resulted in
FHWA deciding that the originally agreed to dates for modeling traffic were no longer
appropriate. New dates were determined and a request for a revised MLOU was
issued.
Almost a year after FHWA requested the revisions, AIM sent a revised MLOU to FOOT
for review. At the same time, and as part of the ETDM Dispute Resolution process,
Packet Page -488-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
FDOT was forced to initiate the first ever Cumulative Effects Evaluations (CEE) and in
September 2010 held its public CEE kick-off meeting.
On November 3,2010, Staff received a signed MLOU from FHWA with comments and
questions that were clarified with further communications. The new MLOU contains
different technical requirements that will result in the need for AIM to revise
analysis/evaluations that were conducted previously, as well as to conduct additional
analysis/evaluations. The new MLOU includes a different set of analysis years that are
4 years later than previously agreed to in the prior MLOU, (Opening Year, Intermediate
Year, and Design/Horizon Year are now 2019/2029/2039). In addition, the FHWA has
directed Collier County to conduct the travel demand modeling using the Year 2035
Financially Feasible Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) model that has recently
been developed during the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) Year
2035 LRTP Update Study. Specific IJR tasks will need supplemental funding in order to
be conducted in accordance with the new direction received from FHWA.
The purpose of providing this history and explanation of the process is to show Staff's
continued efforts to move the project forward despite delays due to circumstances
beyond the control of the County. In order to achieve successful completion of the
project, this change order will enable the continued performance of services within the
terms specified in the contract.
Staff recognized that additional funding would be required and budgeted an additional
$200,000 toward that effort in the 2011 fiscal year budget.
Staff is requesting Board approval of the attached Change Order to facilitate Staff's
continued efforts to complete the 1-75 Interchange IJR.
FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal Impact is $125,110. Sufficient funds exist within the Gas Tax
Fund (313), Project 60060, 1-75 Interchange to complete the IJR. (FDOT has sufficient
funds to complete the CEE and the PD&E and is currently programming design).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 1-75/Everglades Interchange is consistent
with the Growth Management Plan and the Long Range Transportation Plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the
County Attorney's Office, is legally sufficient for Board action and only requires a
majority vote for Board approval-SRT.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the Change
Order for Project 60060 and authorizes the Chairman to execute the Change Order.
PREPARED BY:
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator
Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation
ATTACHMENTS:
Change Modification Form
Supplemental Scope of Services
Attachment A, Man-hour and cost estimate summary
Change Order
Packet Page -489-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 10.E.
Item Summary: Recommendation that the Board approve a Change Order to facilitate
Staff's continued efforts to complete the 1-75 Interchange Justification Report (IJR). (Fiscal
Impact $125,110)
Meeting Date: 5/10/2011
Prepared By
Name: AnnstrongDebbie
Title: Project Manager.Transportation Planning
4/]5/201110:12:41 AM
Approved By
Name: GreeneMichael
Title: Manager - Planning,Transportation Planning
Date: 4/18/2011 I :32:15 PM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, CDES
Date: 4/18/2011 2:52:47 PM
Name: LaPierreBarbara
Title: Management/Budget Analyst.Transportation Administr
Date: 4/18/2011 3:24:46 PM
Name: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services.Comprehensive
Date: 4/19/20118:17:00 AM
Name: ParkerNicole
Title: Contracts Specialist.Purchasing & General Services
Date: 4/20/2011 8:05:44 AM
Name: Carnell Steve
Title: Director - Purchasing/General Services.Purchasing
Date: 4/21/2011 7:39:58 AM
Packet Page -490-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
Name: Marcellaleanne
Tit]e: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date: 4/2]/20]] 8:00:]0 AM
Name: FederNonnan
Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati
Date: 4/22/20] 1 ] :44:35 PM
Name: TeachScott
Title: Deputy County Attorney,County Attorney
Date: 4/22/2011 ] :45:48 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 4/28/20]] ] 1:50:29 AM
Name: UsherSusan
Title: Management/Budget Ana]yst, Senior,Office of Manage
Date: 5/3/20 I] ] 0:] 6:] 5 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 5/3/201] 2:53 :06 PM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 5/3/20] 13:5]:4] PM
Packet Page -491-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
c&,Cnmty
~ -~---~.......--..
M l * i.f.dliIlElSeNcesCilisial
Purtii....g
[8J Contract Change Request
Purchasing Department
Change Modification Fonn
o Work Order Modification
Contract #: 08-5006 Mod#: 4 POlWork Order#: 45-10177 Proiect Name: 1-75 IJR
Project #:60060 Project Manager: Department: Transportation ContractorfFirm Name: Aim
Debbie Annstronq Plannina Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
Original ContractIWorl< Order Amount {',$,;: 63,9.6'9,50< '.",- ":'+,I:!"l!'S!06: Original BCC ApprolS' Date; Agenda ~em #,
.CurreiilEi-cC-;...-pprol.eci":A.mouni---. ,:$:I:<6?3;'!l94;SO:~ < ""'!;,-{::1'6B1'2 LastIfcCAppn;;..Hl,rte;Agend,,-ftem #--:
CUrrentcoritracuWQri(6~er Amount :$,1':673;99.4.50:: -'----~----r---'-._..__..~-~.---.--i
r. '
"DOllarA'mount of this Change ' - ,;, ' $125;'t10.00i' 24.90% Totiii Change'iromoriginal Amount-- i
ReVise(j"New-COntracVwQrk6~er 1'o("j'l $799.104,50 I' 1 8.56% -' Change fi'omCum,nrEicc Appro\eCI Amount
cu-m-uTatl\ie"Chan-ges--- ~---_._-_._-".' I $1 59,286.00 1- 18.56% "--,--,---_.,._---------------
Change from Current Amount '
, ,;c- r", ,;'-'::';,,';',:;'\:. ::~::;1;. ':. ,." '-, -'i"'" ;'_"">' ,',' . :~;i '," ;, ,. ,,' , ," ' " --'.' ,'I" ,',., ,'; ',', ..,", ~.,"- ,-' .: ,.", '",",', ,.: ~w ': .~[, -" 'c":',' ':
". "" Completion Date; Description of the Task(s) Change'- and Rationale for the Change.. ..
,o,;::;,? ',;.-~",,~.' :;i, ,:::':~~""",, ': ::':,,: :'~:<>:>:, :::':. "'. ,;'i" ':,:.i. :";,:;':,:::,':,, ' :::;:'~,.,': :,'", ' ':, "". :",,!' ,< ':~':i::, ;::"',:,., ):~,~L,',;:;h~',.:::,' "'/:.;."
..'
,,;:{
~l~,~,~:- :'H'~I~'
~I'
"'"ii":'
Original notice to proceed
compietion date: January 30, 2009
Number of days added (if
extension, must attach current
insurance certificate(s) from SAP
or obtain from vendor: 552
Add new task(s) I
Last approved completion date: I Revised completion date (inciudes this
May 29, 2011 ! change): November 30, 2012
Explain why additional days are needed (detailed/specific):
Please see explanation beiow, It is imperative that this project continues forward and
without a roval of additional time the fa"ect will fail.
Change task(s) Delete task(s)
Other (specify): Start same tasks
over from the beginning.
1. Provide a detailed and specific explanation of the requested change{s) to the task(s): Please see #2 below. The
new Methodology Letter of Understanding (MLOU) contains different technical requirements that will result in the need to
revise analyses/evaluations that were conducted previously, as well as to conduct additional analyses/evaluations. The
new MLOU will Include a different set of analysis years (Opening Year, Intennediate Year, and Design Year) than what I
was included (and previously agreed to) in the prior MLOU. In addition, the FHWA has directed Collier County to conduct
the travel demand modeling using the Year 2035 Financially Feasible Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) model
that has recently been developed during the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) Year 2035 LRTP
Update Study. For additional information pertaining to each task, please see the attached Supplemental Scope of
SeNices.
2. Provide detailed rationale for the requested change:
Unforeseen, strong environmentai opposition created the need for Dispute Resolution and a Cumulative Effects Study
on this project Those delays resulted in FHWA decision to require a revised MLOU, which requires a substantial
amount of work already completed to be redone and additional tasks to be performed,
3. Provide explanation why change was not anticipated in original scope of worle We could not anticipate the delay
caused by the environmental opposition (FOOTs Cumulative Effects Study is the first of its kind) nor that FHWA would
require a reVised MLOU based upon new data after the first MLOU was already complete.
4. Describe the impact if this change is not processed: This project is to complete an Interchange Justification Report
(IJR) and the MLOU is a required step in that process. Without this change, the project will fail including the parallel and
subsequent funded portions of the project that the FOOT is currently managing.
, TyPe of Change I Modification
2. Unforeseen condrtions/circumstance
5. Value added
1. Pianned / Elective
4. Correction of arro s
3. Quanti or rice ad.ustment
6. Schedule ad'ustment
Revised: 2/21/11
1
Packet Page ,492-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
Change Requested By
Contractor/Consultant
e I ModifICation:
USln De artment
Other S i
Yes No
: Approved by:
Name and Title:
Reviewed by:
Purchasing Professional's Name:
Date: '-/ _ ~ II
Revised: 2/21/11
2
Packet Page -493-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
........-.....-....
..... ,....,."..
AIM Engineering
& Surveying, 1nc.
1 (y,rO Clff:ce
.Joe:,: BI,::;derll:j~!:;. F(~;Ir:'"\'~JY
~,ui:e 100
TOITIPO, Flor-idc) 3361(:
813-627-<1144
868-627-4144
f:o\: 813-664-1899
w.,.'..;,:.
S l,'~_':>: :~j ui"/ c"'.,...,'-:J,'{ 'Q:.J~i' ci,~.',J" ;:)':d ,'1'/2 cc'nrr il"I;!)' Iv;'1 ,', U ,'G,' I,. P':' .'~r ,'1:';: ",'1';'11'18<0.,' ir:'c Olid ~ut, '2)':11;; ~:21 Ji::. P'; ~1i1 -;,-:- J ?Bt)
I-75/EVERGLADES BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (lJR)
COLLIER COUNTY PROJECT # 60060
CONTRACT # 08-5006
SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.0 PURPOSE
The Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) required a new Methodology Letter of Understanding (MLOU) be
prepared and approved for use with the I-75/Everglades Boulevard Interchange Justification Report (DR). The new
MLOU contains different technical requirements that will result in the need for AIM Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
(the CONSULTANT) to revise analyses/evaluations that were conducted previously, as well as to conduct
additional analyses/evaluations. The new MLOU includes a different set of analysis years (Opening Year,
Intermediate Year, and Design Year) than what was included (and previously agreed to) in the prior MLOU. In
addition, the FHW A has directed Collier County to conduct the travel demand modeling using the Year 2035
Financially Feasible Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) model that has recently been developed during the
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) Year 2035 LRTP Update Study. The specific DR tasks that
will need supplemental funding in order to be conducted in accordance with the new direction received from FHW A
include the following:
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task I - Traffic Data Collection
No additional work effort is required for this la_k at this time.
Task 2 - Travel Demand Forecasting
The CONSULTANT will develop land use data sets (i.e. ZDATA) for the years 2019 (Opening Year), 2029
(Intermcdiatc Ycar), and 2039 (Design Year). The CONSULTANT will incorporate the 2019 ZDATA into the 2015
E+C model. code a new interchange at 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard. run this model, and obtain a plot of the 2019
AADT volumes. The CONSULTANT will then remove thc interchange at 1-75 and Everglades Boulevard, re-run
the 2019 model, and obtain a plot of the 2019 AADT volumes forthis altemative, The CONSULT ANT shall review
the two sets of 2019 AADT volumes (i,e, with and without a new interchange at Everglades Boulevard), assess the
reasonableness of the traffic projections, and summarize the 2019 AADT volumes.
The CONSULTANT will incorporate the 2039 ZDATA into the 203:; financially Feasible LRTP model, run this
model, and obtain a plot of the 2039 AADT volumes. The CONSULTANT will then remove the interchange at 1-75
and Everglades Boulevard that is included in the MPO's 2035 Financially Feasible LRTP, re-run the 2039 model,
and obtain a plot of the 2039 AADT volumes for this alternative. The CONSULTANT shall review the two sets of
2039 AADT volumes (i.e,. with and without a new interchange at Everglades Boulevard). assess the reasonableness
of the traffic projections, and summarize the 2039 AADT volumes.
The CONSULT ANT will run the 2019 and 2039 models with the new iuterchange located at Desoto Boulevard.
The 2019 and 2039 AADT volumes obtained from these model runs will be compared to the 20] 9 and 2039 AADT
volumes obtained from the Everglades Boulevard interchange altemative model IUUS. The CONSULT ANT will
develop a Year 20J9 model for an altemative scenario that does not include a new interchange on 1-75, This
Author: g. root
Page 1
Packet Page -494-
4/4/2011
I
I A11\11 Engineering
& Surveying, 1nc.
5/10/2011 Item 1 DE
:JI'r:, (Ih,_>"
3C'~: [;''::0< kE::' \':J~~: F~"J"WD\
'J:lt", C:'
13-:::27-01 144
R'_."!IE
CJEH:':;7-Ll ,44
OTr>J ;">8(; ?~'t 1:)
Fox:
13-66-1" lcS:9
T~,"_:~~~~,:~,,; "<,;vie-' 1";~"-::-'_';'7---;';:-~~::-r~'-~------------'- C"~_'~'-;;:~ ~:~,r'ICc-;-~~~~' :~:~,'",~,-::,-~:-;;;:; ! c~-:;-
ternati ve scenario will include either the widening of an existing study area roadway or the construction of a new
study area roadway. This improvement should be an improvement that is included in the Collier MPO's 2035 Needs
Plan but not included in the 2035 Financially Feasible LRTP, The CONSULTANT will run this alternative
improvement scenario for 20]9 and obtain the AADT volumes. The 2039 model that does not include a new
interchange on 1-75 will be modified to include the same alternative roadway improvement that was coded in the
20]9 alternative improvement scenario and then run to obtain the 2039 MDT volumes. The 20]9 and 2039 AADT
volumes for this alternative will be reviewed and summarized.
The CONSULTANT will develop a Year 2025 Financially Feasib]e LRTP model by adding the Financially Feasible
roadway improvements identified by the MPO for the time period 2015 - 2025 to the 2015 E+C model. The 2029
ZDA T A will be incorporated into this model and the 2029 model will be run for the following altematives:
. No new interchange on 1-75;
. No new interchange on 1-75 but with an alternative study area improvement (i.e., the same alternative
improvement included in the 20]9 and 2039 alternative improvement scenario models);
. A ne,^" interchange on ]-75 at Everglades Boulevard; and
. A new interchange on 1-75 at Desoto Bonlevard
The 2029 AADT volumes for these alternatives will be reviewed and summarized.
Task 3 - Technical Memorandum No.1
Thc CONSULTANT will prepare a Technical Memorandum documenting the mcthodology used to develop the
2019,2029, and 2039 land use data. as wen as the 2019, 2029, and 2039 travel demand mode] networks,
Task 4 - Technical Memorandum No.2
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Technical Memorandum summanzing the 2019. 2029, and 2039 MDT
volumes forecasted for the study area roadway network for the following alternatives:
. No new interchange on 1-75:
r; No new interchange on ]-75 but \\'ith an alternative study area improvement;
. A new interchange on ]-75 at Everglades Boulevard; and
. A new interchange on 1-75 at Desoto Boulevard
These AADT volumes will be summarized in tabular and/or graphical format. It is anticipated that north/south
screenline volume comparisons and/or a Golden Gate Estates cordon line volume comparison will also be
documented for the alternatives.
Task 5 - Traffic Operations Anal)'sis
The CONSULTANT will conduct opening year. intermcdiate year, and design year level of service analyses for the
p0l1ions of Golden Gate Boulevard betwecn Desoto Boulevard and CR 95], Everglades Boulevard between 1-75
and Golden Gate Boulevard, and Desoto Boulevard between J-75 and Golden Gate Boulevard. If the results of tbe
opening year analysis conducted for Everglades Boulevard and Desoto Boulevard (for the altenlatives that include a
new interchange at one of these locations) indicate that an acceptable level of service is projected to occur for the
existing (i.e.. two-lane undivided) roadway, the CONSULTANT will conduct an additional analysis to provide an
estilnate as to when (what year) the four-Ianing of the existing roadv.'ays will be needed.
Author: g. root
Page 2
Packet Page -495-
4/4/2011
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
...._':,;.
1~nv1 Engineering
& Surveying, Ine.
l~Jr":;:J() Ofk::e
ssw BreCYBlllic-J';JE: PcnV-iCJY
~uiiE 100
Tcm~,po, ;::or'ico ':<::610
813-617-.111 .II
8SEl-627-.d 1 A
Fox: 813664129
s~<_ (. to ~~i lllil' ,A()vidiIIC UUi ';;J:'er! ~ :):I~:j ii,,:;; C:' liirT,l'o'!ih IV,'I,; CiA),:": i i:J"c." : r;. " t"n~lIrtef:c'n _ (J :I'j :urv e\';n:.J :;;I::'!'iic;e~ :,i: ce ,; S;8('
Task 6 - Draft Interchange Justification Report
No additional work effort is required for this task at this time.
Task 7 - Final Interchange Justification Report
No additional work effort is required for this task at this time.
Task 8 - Meetings and CoordinationlProject Management/Quality Control
The CONSULTANT will attend a maximum of five (5) meetings with the District One Interchange Review
Committee and/or the Central Office. The purposes of these meetings will be to present key technical findings,
obtain interim approvals of analysis parameters, discuss FDOTIFHW A review comments and comment responses,
and provide updates on the project schedule. The CONSULTANT will also be expected to maintain an appropriate
level of coordination with Collier County throughout the duration of the UR Study. This coordination may include
participation in monthly progress briefingslconference calls, preparation of monthly progress reports/invoices,
project schedule updates. and responding to requests for project information. The CONSULTANT will also be
expected to maintain an appropriate level of coordination with the FDOT's 1-75/Everglades Boulevard Interchange
Cumulative Effects Evaluation Study Team throughout the duration of the IJR Study.
Task 9 . Engineering Analysis
The CONSULTANT will update the preliminary construction cost estimates that were developed previously for the
alternative interchange concepts. The CONSULTANT will develop a conceptual signing plan for the proposed
interchange to ensure that the interchange docs not have any "fatal flaws" with respect to signing.
Task 10 - Environmental Analysis
No additional work effort is required for this task at this time.
Task 11 - Public Involvement
The CONSULT ANT will prepare a Public Involvement Summary section for inclusion in the UR. This section will
summarize the Public Involvement activities conducted during the IJR Study including the Public Information
Meetings that are held.
3.0 COMPENSATION
The total cost of this lump sum supplemental agreement is $125,110.00, The detailed man-hour/fee estimate for this
supplemental agreement is provided in Attachment A. If additional services above and beyond those outlined in this
supplemental scope of services are required by Collier County, the Consultant will provide these additional services
through either a separate Task Work Order or through an additional Change Order to the original contract.
Author: g. root
Page 3
Packet Page -496-
4/4/2011
Igl' gl ! i
o OJ i ~
::;1 I 1 11' 1l: '~,,~ II
M iF> ~ 0 [J1 I~I M I
~1.loO, ::>, 0 I\:l 0 J:;. g ~Ig'. 0
~ - 10 01.... 0 0 .... 0
o 0 8 0 01 0
,8 I I" I 8 10 01 I
,~
,~
m
~
~
..
~
~
~n
000
!:a!:
!;iil::l:
g;~
, . .
;;
;~! iiJ, ;; im'i
'I~I :~I II~ I~I
I~ j'g ,~ I~
"~I ,[ ~ ~'~'
o' 0 I; ::l
I~ I~ !5'.' ~
!~ ;a ~ 8
'~ I~I .€,. !9:, I
ro > ,,<:1 ,', 1
;a ~I i~" I~-i '
'>!l. '-:..1
''''; I iR'
I
m
,-
~
,
~
~
,
w
c
~
.
3
~
"
,-
o
w
~
~
.
<
'~
,-
"
1 ,
,~ ,i
'" $:
gim 81
0'
01
, ,
~~
g ~ CD ~I'
g2l
,
~
o
i8'
!
I~'
;
.uo '6'li I
N.,. ....."
co... . '....
~ ~ ~ ~ir:;,::;,
~ CI "I 01
g Cl 8 !
,
I
~
.
.
..
~
~
~:
~'m -~'o~[
8, 8;0;gl
g'
~M ~', 'I~' I~I :
ell.... .wl :&>' ,-.J! .otIol 'M:
a,.l>.... ~1""'ClI <:t>,o:n~,..,'p,
g g ~ oA sl.. I~I. g'~gl
g Cl 8 : is! 18
~~ ~I' ~ If'tl'f't' 1.,,1
~ ~ Q ~I I:'si, :8 8 :81
! i Ii:
1 .
~
NM '
t; ~ ~ 1':1'
g~CIIg
00
o
~
'0'
iol
jO
~
~~...~I
~ g ~ g:
8
,
, , ,
I~ '''''
,0 0
gl g!
,
,
, ,
~I '~'
1
,g,
Ii
I
M!t ~'I
poQo
00 0
00 0
o I
1':0' 'I ....1 ,'g
o :81 ig
,
I: !
~~ <gi
is ~ Q 8!
i~1 ,~
8
~
o
o
o
;15
,
,
, I
I~, I~
0, 0
'0 0
'0 10
~ I 0 ~ I~; '~
,
,
~
o
o
o
v'
.~ ,
~ ~ g: ~I
!=l is CD 51
8 ,
~
..,.,. ,.: t/' ....
~I !!I~I~'llg
! ~I ;
r.... ::1
~ 8 "" -f1=:.4 ~
O. ll'I ol~ 0
68 i;;? ::>
o ~,
~
'0
6'
o
1$.... '1!. I",,'
~ ~ t 8 00:01
0<::> . ,0
gag 0
~
o
o
o
~ .....j;g'1 '~
~ 0>:81 !g
o
00
~ ~ M ~
~ ~ ~ N
$ -~ ~
~
,; ~- 0 0
" 0 0
S 0 0 0 g
0 0 0
:1':1 't;
8i Is
i I I :
~ 'I~ ' I ~ I'
_~ W t'il .w ~!
~ (Xl g ~I~I~ 8 ~ 81
8 18 81 18 i:
i~II~I'
I I!
I~I
l-.j
'0
!~
,"-
I~
I
il 'Iii I~llili
~,! ~I' II~, .~i
~I- ,i ,~ :~
$ I~ I~' i.~
I~' ;: ~;:
iQ,>llm ;m
i :g- :~ '3
II i~[, I[
!~ '~: 1\
," I,z' zi
~~ 0 01
'I' i II~, ,-:
I I I I
I~I
:~I
~
o jo
~ ''"''
r~llil
I~, ~
!~ :[
i~ I '~f
I~I'
II,
I~II
i
I I i
{h, ~~ '}Z-~i "~:I 1(;>'
o it:;''-''$ ~ g:C<l'.w,~'!='
g' 1~'./>.ooo6 I~,"'g
,8' g 0 ISi
'~I'
!~
! '
.....:
61
'0'
i i
,
,~
,0'
,6'
,::;>1
! I
,
,
!~
'is: liS!
,
,~
o
:8
~I
~
o
S
~
o
8
:oo!
0,
8'
~,
o
g
~,
01
0'
a'
,
~
0'
01
,
:1: :~!, ''t i IY>,!;. :"'. ;~I '
o ffl 10 _~ ,'" ,fit "W, .",,' ..'" ~~ ,(,'l -I
"', lO-o,ol~ ::::ic.l. i::5-0 o,oo;t;;(rlOlrol~ .1>.'-.....,1:::1.0 0 c
.l>. "";0 co.....,'...o'g' o. !o,m.....<Xl1o 0 ....Nlo "_
o '0 '0,' 0 ,01" -0 j_ 0 ::>
g 'g:5 ! giS, 18 g,
:....j
101
,8
I
, ,
;t11 i~:
g: [8
gl'1':
'0' i8
1
~
61
o
,
~
o
0'
01
1
, I
~ ,~
o '0
o 0
c, 0
:
~'
o
o
o
,
,
,
I
, I
",I!
':'gOI'o, .
:81
, I
,
;.y,:
'0,
181
:....,
o
8
g: !
o
,
Packet Page -497-
gl'
Ie
~
51
0,
! ,
'<;gl ~; ~
g' 8i IS
,
,
,
I~I
! '
.... -6"1' ......
o 01 0
o 0' 0
o 0, 0
,
,
~; ,t;j I~
g igl g'
,
I: I I
! I
i~ I~;
;8 Isl
,
,
'~
10
i.......
o
g
I~I
! I
~
D
o
o
Ig:
D,
D
:t; ,~ :1:5 tIl
'-" ",(Il!~,N A'O
,~ .j;o.jO'cnlo,o,o,o
'0, 0
g '0' ,iSi :
! I !
,
,g!
1,-",
~
g
~
o
o
,0
1
~! :lgl~'~1 ~
0' ? "",0 0> 0
'.:> ,S! is' 0
~
=
~
~~
[~
"
.~
. ,
, 0
....
~ !l.
m
,
_W
~ "
w
~"
.~
, ,
~ ~
~
::!:!::;l
. .
, ,
, "
.~
w
~-'
n. m
. ,
a 5.
~' ~
Wm
!:!.::l
. <
;. a
!a.?
>
1;: E
~Ul
o
, n
-11>
,0
.,0
".,
w.
~"
~ <:'.,
~
" ~
, ,
~~
."
,
W
~ :t'
iE:-
"
>Q
~.
~ ~.
, .
. ~
5/10/2011 Item 10.E,
00
~~
, .
~~
Zc
0,
~-<
OO~
0.0
g~
."
.
~
o
o
~
o
~
~
.
,
0. ,.
~ "
~ ~ ~
iii~~
:i"ma
~c5 )>
g 5. 3:
f m ~
a. S' ~
_CD c
3. tl:l'"
~ ::J ~
g.o...D.
~~~
'; < ~
2- ro ~
tII '$.
:=.::l 3"
5'~ ~
!:
cr 3" ~
::J 0 3
D 3
.g .
o .;,
:l
<:
2
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
: !?
'-
CHANGE ORDER
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
CONTRACT NO.08-5006
BCC Date: 1115108
Agenda Item: 16B 12
TO: Aim Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
5802 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite 100
Tampa. FL 33610
DATE: ADrill. 2011
PROJECT NAME: 175 DR
PROJECT NO.: 60060
Under our AGREEME"'T dated January 15, 2008.
You hereby are authorized and directed to make the following change(s) in accordance with terms and
conditions of the Agreement: See attached Supplemental Scope of Services.
FOR THE Additional Sum of: One hundred twenty five thousand one hundred and ten dollars and no
cents ($125,110,00).
Original Agreement Amount
$639.819.50
Sum of Previous Changes
$ 34.175.00
This Change Order add
$125.110.00
Present Agreement Amount
S799.104.50
The time for completion shall be increased by 552 calendar days due to this Change Order. Accordingly, the
Contract Time is now 4 years 10 months (1767) calendar days. The final completion date is November 30,2012.
Y OUf acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to Qur Agreement and will be performed
subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in our A!:,'Teement indicated above, as fully as if the
same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, jf any, to the Agreement shall constitute a full and final
settlement of any and all claims of the Consultant arising out of or related to the change set forth herein,
including claims for impact and delay costs.
Accepted: ApC I \ \ \
CONSULTANT:
AI1vf Engineering & Surveying, lnc.
.2011.
c-..~
---- '~
By: '"---)'~
Mr. Sean Donahoo, P.E. Vice President
O\VNER:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~ ,
./ ,., .
'/' i.<',
j, ...., <'
By: I
Debbie fu-rnstrong, Project Manager
/",.' '!',,':;)-
By: -,,'
Michael Greene. P ,E"
Transportation Planning Manager
Packet Page -498-
(by:
) ~
~"'<-' ---./ //' -/.,i,'.' ,i,'i B
- ' V'
I\lD~(t)Al\l Fr::of~ 1~JI'P;"iid'Y1ln'~l "lTO-r ~'
G-<?''''\-! rl\1>"A-~8nE\\)T O,,)ISION
Date:
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock. Clerk
BY:
BY:
Approved As To Form
and Legal Sufficiency:
/'
,} ,
t-.' I
Print Name: .-.:..~
At*;~~H:HH County Atlamey
, .. ~.-
Packet Page -499-
5/10/2011 Item 10, E.
DIVISION DEPUTY ADMIN1STRATOR
';~~1 .7 ./ (::,.-7
,/1 //....--.:...j;/;:v'_y~/ /' __'-
Nick Casal an guida, Deputy Alilriinistralor
Cirov..'th Management Division
By:
Rhonda Cummings, Contract Specialist
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS10NERS OF
COLLJER COUNTY FLORIDA
Fred W, Coyle, Chairman
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
(,OOP@
CHANGE ORDER
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
CONTRACT NO.08-5006
BCC Date: 1/15108
AgendaUem: 16B] 2
TO: Aim Engineering & Surveying, Ine.
5802 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite 100
Tampa. FL 33610
DATE: Ami] 1 20]]
PROJECT NAME: 175 DR
PRomCT NO.: 2QQ2Q
Under our AGREEMENT dated January ]5.2008.
You hereby are authorized and directed to make the following chauge(s) in accordance with terms and
conditions of the Agreement: See attached Supplemental Scope of Services.
FOR THE Additional Sum of: ODe hundred twenty five thousand one hundred and teD dollars and no
cents ($125,110.00).
Original Agreement Amount
$639 8] 9.50 ,/"
Sum of Previous Changes
$ 34.175.00
/
This Change Order add
$125.110.00
/
Present Agreement Amount
$799.]04.50
The time for completion shall be increased by 552 calendar days due to this Change Order. Accordingly, the
Contract Time is now 4 years 10 months (1767) calendar days. The final completion date is November 30,2012.
Your acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be perfonned
subject to all the same lenns and conditions as contained in our Agreement indicated above. as fully as if the
same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment. if any, to the Agreement shall constitute a full and final
settlement of any and all claims of the Consoltant arising out of or related to the change set forth herein.
including claims for impact and delay costs.
Accepted: 1f1; \ t \ , 20] 1.
CONSULTANT:
AIM Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
BY:S~
Mr. Sean Donahoo. P.E. Vice President
OWNER:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A}' COILlER CO"UNTY. FLORIDA
{ IJ!
By:,( ,,' /!,'J<~,;[01<.s;'
Debbie Annstrong, Project Mana r
ev.iQ
By: "",
Michae] Greene, P.E..
Transportation Planning Manager
Packet Page -500-
Pit:
" .....
., " ,//' f
.r {:1'/
, ,-",.,,< J " !/It.----
, '. - By'
No r<)At'\! FfOf Nrc)fj rn<n'sJr~n,l'
~oUl~ r<\A.....~&n!"T D"JI>,orv
(
I
Date;
A TrEST:
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BY:
BY:
Approved As To Form
and Legal Sufficiency:
Print Name:
AssIstant County Attorney
Packet Page -501-
5/10/2011 Item 10.E.
DIVISION DEPUTY ADMIN1STRATOR
~.-'J /?
U if. '
Nick Casalangriida, Deputy nistrator
Growth Management Division
By:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLlER COUNTY FLORIDA
Fred W, Coyle. Chairman
I