The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 05/26/1981 R "'''-_'''_'''''"''''~'' *_'0 . . --"'-~-----""------~.--~ ____._,..,J. Naploß, rlørlda, MÐY 26, 1981 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commiooioners in and lor the County of Collior, ðnd Ðlso ncting as tho Coverning Doard(s) of such special districts as have been created accordIng to law and having conductod buniness herein, mot on. this date at 9tOO A.M. 1n Rogular 508s10n in Building "r" of tho Courthouse Complex with tho following memb~rs prascntt CHAIRMANt John A. Pistor VICE CIIAIRMANt Clifford \'Ienzol C. R. "Russ· WIm~r M~ry-Franccs Krusc Dn" i1 C. Drown I ALSO PRESENT, WIlliam J. Roagan, Clerk, Harold.L.~Hall, Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer, Edna L. Brenneman and Darlene Davidson (1130 P.M.), Deputy Clerks, C. William lIorman, County Manager Donllld A. PIcbl0rth, County '&'ttornoy, Irving Derzon, Utilities MDf'lDger, Torry L. V1rta, Community Devalopment Administrator, Thomas Hafner, Public Eafoty AdminI3trator, Loo Lðyne, Planner, Jeffory Perry, Zo~ing Director, Martha Skinnor, Social Services Diroctor Crace SpÐulding, Adminlstr3t1ve Aide to the Soard and, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett, Sher1ff's Department. pago 1 Bao~ 061 r^GE 631 .-,-.-..-,-----------...-----------------.- ~ , ""--.'.--,--..,.." " . 1 -------------------------------_.' May 2 t5, 1981 AGENDA - APpnOVED WITH ^DDITIOWS/D~LETIONS Commissioner Wenzel moved, aocondcd by Commissioner Kruso and unanimously carried, that the italicized agenda be approv~d with the followIng additions and deletions I 1. Two additional items to be adðed under Proclamations. 2. Petition NZ-8l-2C, Board of County Comminsioncrs, roquo6tin9 amendment to ßo~t Dock Section of Zoning Ordinðnco - Wit: hd r £I wn . .- J. petition R-8l-SC, ~aldron Sundstrom, requoBting rezoning of cortain M~rco Island Property - Withdrawn. . 4. DiacuGsion of necessity of hiring consultDnt with respect to powor probloms being cncountorcd in Data Processin9 Dep~rtment - ^ddod. 5. Appointment of Provider to rcpresent the Board on thc Health Systems Council - Added. 6. Recommendation for approval of ExcavlItion Permit No. 59.121, National Trust Company - Withdrawn at roqucst of petitioner. 7. Authorization for emergcncy purchase of EMS equipmcnt - Add~d. 8. Roquest for assistance with resurfacing of tennis courts at Everglades City - Added. 9. Items listed under County Managcr'A Report - To be heard at tho and of the agenda. 10. Authorization to hire p~rt-time socretarIal employee - Add~. 11. Consideration of extonding Board vacation to includo the first two weeks in July - Added. -.I MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF MAY 5 AND MAY 12, AND OF SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 8, 19B1 - APPROVEDt APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 19, 1981 - Df.FERRED Commissionor Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously carried, that tho minutes of tho Regular Meetings of May 5 and May 12, 1981, and of the Special Meeting of May 8, 1981 be Pðg e 2 BOOX 061 PAGE 637 ~ ~----'------------:-----~----------_., ~ "--",,_....,..,_. . . . . 1_"----__ -....1_ _ ____ _ _____ _ _ __ ___-:...._____---'___ __ ~ BOO~ 061 PAGE '638 May 26, 1981 approved, and that the minutes at tho Regular Meoting or May 19, 1981 be deterred. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS PRESENTED TO ROAD DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES ALVAREZ, PAR~M^N AND HUTTMAN, AND TO IMMOKALEE INSPECTION DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE nENDny Chairman pi.tor presented tho following 5-YQar Employee Service Awards, with appreciðtion, to the following individua1s1 Jorgo Alvðrez* Willie rarkman* Horman Huttman* Betty Hondry 5 Years 5 Yaara 5 'x'eðrs 5 YOc!lrS Roðd Departmont Road Department Road Dep/:lr tment In9pection Department (Immok£llo~) * In ðttendance to receive the aWDrd. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF RETIRING DEPUTY CLERK BRENNEMAN - ADOPTED Following the reðding of sarno by Chairmðn Plstor, Commissionor Brown moved, soconded by Commissioner Wimer ðnd unanimously carried, that the Proclamation in recognition of retlrin~ Deputy Clerk Edna L. Brenneman, Recording Socretary, Board Minutes and RecordG, be ~doptod. - . .' ~'r , PaC,] 0 3 " ------------------------------------- 'r-, c=J ,~ ~ --_.....; : , . I . . · . '. . , . .' . . . . ------~-------.---------------'--:-"~ c.:}o~ 061 PAGE '640 May 26, 1981 RESOLUTIONS 81-125 THROUGH 81-134 IN APPRECIATION OF EFFORTS or VARIOUS COUNTY FIRE DEP^RTMENT6, SOUTH TRAIL FIRE DEPAnTME~T, AND OIVISION OF FORESTRY DURING ReCENT WILDFIRE FIR~FIGHTING ACTIVITIES - ADorTED FollowIn9 tho reading of 8ðme by Chalr~an Plator, Comœlasioner Wonzel moved, seconded by Commi8.ioner Kruse and carried, that the following Resolutions In appreciation at the efforts of the various County Fire Dopartmonta, the South Trail Fire Department, and the Division of Forestry, durln9 tho recent wild!i,e firefighting activl- ties, be adopted¡ Roao1ution 81-125 - Isles of Capri Re601utIon 81-126 - Golden Gate Resolution 81-127 - Marco Island Rcsolution Bl-128 - East Naples Resolution Rl-129 - North Naplos Rcsolution Bl-130 - Ochopee Resolution 81-131 - Big Corkscrew Swamp Resolution 81-132 - Division of Forestry Resolution 01-133 - South Trail RosolutIon 81-134 - Little Hickory/Bonita Shores Page 4 --------------------------------- , , ':"--' c::J '-" .--1 · I -----------____________-.-J_________ May 26, 1901 SOCIAL SERVICES CAnE NO. W-8075 - ^PPROVED Conlmi8sioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissionor Kruse and. carried by unÐnimous vote, that Social Sorvicos Caøo No. W-8075 be approved, as recommended by Social Sorvices Director Martha Skinner. ORDINANCE 01-27 RE PETITION R-nO-41C, WAFAA ASSA^D, REPRESENTING ~IMBREL, BURNS ^ND C^LLANDER, REQUESTING REZONING OF PROPERTY ~NOWN AS "WILDWOOD EST^TES· - ADOPTED WITII 5TIPUUTIONS, PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT TO C^PC STIPUL^TIONS - ACCEPTED Legðl notice hovin~ boen published in the Naplos Daily Newo on April 25, 1981 (pre-dated April 26, 1901) aR evIdenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public haaring WðS oponed to consider Petition R-80-4lC, filed by Wafaa Assaad, ropresenting Kimbrel, Burns and Callander, requesting the rozoning of proporty known an ·wildwood Estates" . Planner Lee Lðyne located the property under petition for rezoning from "^" ^griculturo to "PUD" Planned Unit Dcvelopment on the map displayed as that area shown in yellow and which i3 located on the North Side of Davi8 Boulevard, NorthwQst of the Twin Drive-In Theater. Ma. Lðyne said that the petitioner is proposing a 710 unit rental multi-fa~ily dovolo~ent with accessory neighborhood commercial uscs. The Coðatal Area Planning Commission recommended forwardIng tho petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval subject to the staff's stipulÐtions, with additional stipulations concerning sharing in the cost of tho installation of a traffic signal, and a reatrictlon pertaining to ðcceos to the commorciol ðreð, ðS follows I 1. Change USCG in the commercial aroa to those of the Convenience Commercial rather than the GRC District. Page 5 600K 081 PAGE 651 --------_._-_._.__...-..._-----_._._-_.._--------_.._.~....... --- ~...-...... ; t '--'~"'- ~ .'-"-' .~_._-------- .-------.-- -----------_._- ~ BOOK 001 PACE 652 . May 26, 19B1 2. Change Goneral Retail Commercial on Page 8 (PUD documont) to Convenienc~ Commercial. 3. Devoloper ahall, øubjoct to FDOT approval, pay hi. appro- priato' share, aB dotermined by the County Engineer, for the cost of the inatal1ðtion of a traffic signal on Davis Boule- vard whon deomed warranted by the County Engineer. The aignal shall bo owned, oporated.and maintainod by Collier County. 4. The only ðCC0150 to the commercial tract shall be via the main entrance to the developmont. 5. Sidewalks shall be located on both sidos of the entrance road up to the e~st/west loop road and along one side of the loop road. , . Ms. Loyne said that a memorandum, dðtod Kay 22, 1981, has been rec~lvad from Utilities Manager Berzon listing stipulations which are missing from tho staff stipulations and from the PUD document.' Ho Asked that the following additional requiremonts be included in the rocommcndationa and tho subjoct documentt 1. That tho extension of the water main from Radio Road to the project oite ohall be coordinated and approved by the Utility Division. 2. That the on-sito wðtor distribution and sewage r.ollaction facilIties shall be deeded to the County and, where necessary, leaned back to the devolopment, prior to any connections being made to thoso water and sower facilitiesl and that connection to County-owned central sower facIlities will be made when 6uçh facility is made available. 3. Prior to the issuance of ðny building permits, all applicÐble water and sewor system developmont charges will be paid. The petitIoner's representative Wafaa Assaad, of the firm at WIlson, Miller, Barton, SolI' Pcck, Inc., informed the Board that the developer hos agreed to all of tho stipulðtions by tho Planning Commission, tho stll!f,ðnd by tho Utility Division. lie pointed out that the particulars of the developmont wore presented during the Page 6 ~--------------------:----------.---- ~ -,,-~"\ c.-:J ---, .,~".._""-,.". , . , _________ ______ ----------_-..4_- ......___ Mð y 26, 1981 hoaring on the petition for an amondment to the Comprehensive Plan. Thero beIng no one registered to ðddross the Board rcgardin<;¡ tho petition, Commissioner Wonzol moved, soconded by Ccm~iD9ioner Brown and unanimously carried, that the public hearing bo cloGod. Commiasioner Krus~ moved, scconðud by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition, that the ordinance, ao numbered and entitled below, be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 12, aubjoct to the ðbovc-refercnced stipulations of the staff, the CAPC, ðnd the Utilities Manager, and that the Petitioner's Agreement to the CAPC stipulations be accepted. ORDINANCE NO. 81-27 AN ORDINl\NCE ^MENDING ORDINANCE 7(,-30, TilE COMPRE- l!ENS~VE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREh OF TilE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT DY ^'MEND- ING TII1': ZONING "TL/\S ~'^P NUMßER 50-26-2 DY CHANGING TilE ZONING CLASSIFIC^TrON FROM "A" AGRICULTUnr. TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT O[~ THE FOLLCWING DESCRIBED pnOPERTYI A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWN- SHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EASTI ^ND DY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DhTE Page 7 BOO~ 061 PACE 653 -----------;--------------.--,----- , . . . . . ~ . '--.,' ----~--~--------~-------~------_.. May 26,1901 RESOLUTION 81-135 VAC^TING 6' f.^SEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 15 AND 16" BLOCK l85~ GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6, REQUESTED BY DONALD E. AND PHYLLIS ^. POWLESS - ADOPTED Lftgal notico havio<) bcen publishod in the tJilp10Ð Dally tJOWß on May 10 and 17, 1981 as evidonced by Affidavit of Publication filed with tho Clerk, p~b1ic hearing was opened to considr.r a request by Donald E. and Phyllis !I. Powle£B for tho vacZltion of tho (iI' Easements betwoen Lots 15 and 16, Block 105, Golden Goto Unit 6. Public Works Administrator/County Engineer Barksdalo reviewud briafly tho pertinent information contained in the Executive Summary dated April 29, 1981, commenting that letters of "No Objection" have been received from the utility companies, tho fact that the Engineering Dßpartmont hðs inspected the lots and hns determined tho casements aro not required for drainage p~rposos, and, also, the fact that the Water Managoment ^dvi50ry BOZlrd has administratively approved the vacation. No persons were registerod tó spook on tho subject, whereupon Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and unùnimously carried, that tho public hearing be closed. Commissionor Wonzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Brown and cilrried by unanimous vote, that Resolution 81-135, as detailed above, be adoptQd. Page 8 ßOOK 061 PACE 655 -------------..-...-...-----....- ..,.......-- . -..... -......--.. .,.. ..,.-----...-.... t ,...._._~,,,...,',"-- - ------ -- ---------- --_&-_--- -- - - --' MlI Y 2 G, 19 a 1 RESOLUTION 81-136 VACATING DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE DOnCHESTER ANC GrWSVENOR SITES, PELICAN DAY UNIT ONE, PETITIONED BY WILLIAM T. BIGGS - ADOPTED Legðl notice having been pUbliÐhod in the H.:1plos Daily UeW8 on MlIY 10 lInd 17, 1981 liB evidencod by ~ffidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing WDS opened to conaidor tho petition filod by William T. lIiggs requesting the vllclItion of the Dra inago Ea8cment ~ithin tho Dorchoster Site and the Grosvenor Site in polican Bay Unit One. Public Works Administrator/County Engineer Barksdale explained that the developers hnvo rededicated a Drainage Easement similar to the ðrea which is being roleasod aB compensation for the,vaclltion. A letter of "No Objection" has boan received from the Polican Bðy Improvement District, aaid Mr. Barksdale, adding that the Water Man- lIgement Advisory Board has revicwod the petition and approved it administratively. The staff recommendation is for approval, concluded Mr. Barksdale. There were no registered spoðkers, whereupon Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by CommiGsioner Brown and unanimously carried, that the public hearing bo closed. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and cðrried by a unanimous vote, that Resolution 81-136, vllcating Drllin~ge Easements on certain peliclIn Bay properties, be adopted. pag e 9 ~OOK 061 PAGE 657 , ----:--- -:--------:-:----7"""t.~- -.-- ----.-------. ~ \ '-"-~~""".""""';" .--- ---------------""---.------------- BOOK Oöl PAGE 660 May 26, 1981 PETITION BD-8l-2C, J,&,MES HEBERT, REPRESENTED BY COLLIER MARtNr., RECUeSTING EXTENSION OF BOAT DOCK TO 461 ON LOT 50, UNIT 1, ISLES OF CAPRI - DENIED Logol notice having be on published in the Naplee Daily ~ewa on May 10, 19B1 a8 eviðencoð by Affidavit of Publication tiled with the Clerk, public hearIng was held to consider Potition BD-8l-2C, tiled by Jamea Hebert, representod by Col~ier Harine, Inc., requosting an extenaion ot a Boat Dock to 461 on Lot 50, Unit 1, Iolos of Capri. Planner Lee Lðyne reforred to the Executive Summary dated ~bY 14, 1981 to explain the reasons why the petition is being recommendod for denill by both tho Coastal Area Planning Commission and the staff, among them the fact that it is felt that another dock at the subject location would bo too intense for Ð single family lot. Hr. Larry Barnhart, of Collier Marine, Inc., representing the potitloncr, oxplained that the purpose for tho extension is to moor ð sailboat, pointing out the physical characteristics of tho adjacent properties, 48 well an displaying p1ctures illustrating tho spanse of the wBtor l1nd the location of the existing dock. fie emp:lllsiz8d the need for ð longor dock and the fact that the watcrway 1s woll ovcr 1001 in width at the subject location. It Wð~ noted by County Manager Norman that there wore no persona regiBtored to spoak on the issue, whoreupon Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Henzel ond unanimously carriod, that the' public ~earlng be cloned. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner ßrown, that the potition be approved. As a rosult of the requested roll call vote, tho motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners Kruso, Wenzol and pintor voting in oppol!li tion. Pðge 10 ---------~-----~-----~---~------- "".~"--"" - ~ ----' r·..···..~~ / . , -- --------------------------- ---.... Mð y 2 6, 1 9 0 1 RESOLUTION 81-137 HE PETITION BD-81-3C, '.rIIOM^S CONRAD, REPREGENTED BY COLLIER M"RINE, INC., REQUEGTING EXTENSION OF flOAT DOCK TO 80' ON LOT 134, UNIT 2, ISLES O~ CAPRI - ADOPTF.D Legal notice having been published in tho Naples Daily News on Hay 10, 19B1 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filod with the Clerk, public hcaring was opened to consider Petition DD-OI-JC, filed by Mr. and Mrs. ThomlSs Conrnd, requesting' tho Qxtension of a Boat Dock to 80' on Lot 13-1, Unit 2, Islos of Capri. Planner Leo Layne roviewed briefly tho information containod in the Executive Summary dated May 14, 1981 wherein the reasons lor the petition bein9 rocommonded for approval by tho Coastlll "roa Planning Commission and tho ataff arc set forth. She voiced agrooment with Commissionor Wcnzol'a statement that, i: it were not for :tho dock, the arelS would be just n ~ud fl~t, adding that the extension should have no detrimental affect on tho safety of other boators in the aroa. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wonzel and carried unanimously, that tho public hoari~g be closed. Commiasioner Wimer moved, scconded by Commissioner ~enzcl and unanimously carried, that Rosolution 81-137 with regard to Petition BD-OI-3C, a~ ðetailed above, be aðoptod. Filed for the record ware several pictures of the ðrea taken at low and high tidos. BOOK 061 PACE 66f Pago 11 ----:------:------ ----:-- ~-----:----.------------I,--' . ,; ~ """-"'"''-'''"'''''.''''''''' ~ ..~-.__.._....- ", n _ _, ...... ~, _ a _. ,u__ .., . BOOX 061 PACE 664 . May 26, 1981 RESOLUTION 81-138 RE PETITION BD-8l-4C, ~EITH EDWARDS, REPRESr.HTED BY COLLIER MARINE, INC., REOUESTING EXTENSION Of BOAT DOCK TO 44' ON LOT 51, UNIT 1, ISLr.S OF C^PRI - ADOPTED Legal notico having been pUbliGhcd in tho'Naples Daily News on M4y 10, 1981 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing wan opened to consider Potition BD-8l-4C, filed by Mr. and Mrs. Koith Edwa~ds, represented by Collier Marine, Inc., requesting an extension of ð Boat Dock to .,." on Lot 51, Unit 1, Isleo ot Capri. Planner tee Lðyne reviowed the Executive Summary dated May 14, 1981 to explain tho reasons why the petition is being recommended for approval, including the differenco in the Staff Roport dated April 29, 1981, recommonding an extension of 32' inatead of tho requested 44'. She saId that the chango was made pursuant to the additional informð- tion presentod at the Coactal Area Planning Commission hearing on M4y 14, 1981, at whIch time the CAPC recommended npprovðl with ð maxImum projection ot 44'. No persons having regiotered to speak, the public hearing was closed upon motion by Co~m18sionÐr Wimer, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and unanimously carried. Commio~ioner Brown moved, ßecondod by Commissioner Wenzel and unanimously carried, that Rosolution 81-130, portaining to Petition BD-Bl-4C, be adopted. Pago 12 ~--------~-----------~----------- ", , . r-"I , '-----' r71 .,....-............. ~ ;- -- - -:-- - -""':""'- - - --:- - ~,..- - - - --:-- -:-- --.- - - - - - - - - - -- - ~ , . , ------ ---------- - ------------- ---... MIJ Y 2 G, 1901 PETITION NZ-8l-2C, DO^RD OF COUNTY CO~MI5SIONERS, REQUESTING AMEN~1ENT TO TilE DOAT DOCK SrCTION OF TilE ZONING ORDINl\NCE TO INCLUDE COMP1EI1'=IAL FACILl'rIES - WITIIDRA',.;N Legal notico having been publiahcd in the Naples Dl\ily NeW8 on May 6, 1981 a8 evidonced by Affidavit of PublicatIon,filed with the Clerk, public hc~ring waz openod to consIðer potition NZ-8l-2C, filed by the Coord of County CommIßGioners, roquestin~ on ðmond~ent to the Boat Dock Section of the Zonin~ Ordinance to include commercial facilities. Pursuant to the requcst by the Constal Aro^ Planning Commission, Commissioner Wimor moved, soconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried by unanimous vote, that tho public hearing be cloned and tho subjoct pot it ion withdrawn at this time. ORDINANCE Ol-2l RE PETITION R-8l-3C, FRANK KLEY, REPRESENTED BY WAFAA ASSAAD, REQUESTIlJG REZONING OF CERTl\IN PROPERTY TO BE KNO\'¡N l\S "RIVEn BEND" - ADOPTED, SUDJECT TO STIPULl\TIONS, PETITIONER'S ACREEMENT TO STIPULATIONS - ACCEPTED Legal notice having been published in tho Naplos Daily News on April 24, 1981 aD cvidenc~d by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clork, publIc hearing was opened to consider Petition n-8l-3C, filed by Frank Kley, requesting rezoning fro~ "A- and "A-ST" to "PUD- for property located on the south side of Tower Road, east of the KOA Camp, and known a8 -River Bend". Planner Lee Layno locatod the subject parcol on the map displayed and said that the potitioner is proposing a multi-family devolopment with 78 units at a dcn5ity of 2.~ units per Acre with provIsions for a tire station site and for open space and preservation areas. The petition i8 being recommended for ðpprovnl by both the Coastal Area Planning Commission and the staff purSuAnt to tho conditions set forth in the Executive Summary dotod May 14, 1901. Furthor conditions would BOOK OÖ1 PACEB67 Pðc:l0 13 : , --------------------------------- BOOK 001 PACE 668 Ma y 16, 1981 have to be aatisfiod by tho Utility Department, said Ma. Layno, a. containod in the memorandum dated May 22, 1981 from the Utili~ie. Mana9~r ~o the Community Development ^dmini8tr~tor, which are included in the recommendation for approval and for inclusion in the PUD docu- mont, aa followøl a) That the Rookory Bay Utilities, Inc. Ðubrni~ rates for sewage troatment services to the County for review and approval by tho Board of County Commiasioners. b) That tho force main and on-sito sewage collection f~cilitIeB be dedicated to the Coun~y and leased bnck to the Utility for operation and maintenance, if the rates aro approved, and until such time AS the County's central scw~r servicos are extended to this aroa. Mr. Wafaa ASDðad, representing the firm of Wilson, Millor, Barton; SolI & Peck, Inc., informed the Board that the dovelopers are in agreement with all of the stipulatIons imposod by the staff, the Planning Commission, and by tho Utilities Division. Thero were no registerod speakers, whereupon Commisnioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Co~missioner Brown and unanimously carried, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Wenzol moved, 'secondod by Commissloner Brown and carried ~/l wtth Commissioner Wimo( voting In oPPoDitIon, that the OrdInance, An numbered anð entitl¿d below, bo adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 12, subject to the stipulations imposed, and that the petitioner's Agreement to the CAPC stlpulations be accepted. Page 14 .,---- ------_._------------------~-----.-- . . " '~-, -- !I - - --- . , --------------------.-------- -----. Mðy 26, 1901 ORDIN^NCr. 81-20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDIIIANCE 76-30, THE COMPRE- HENSIVE ZOUING R~:GULA'l'IONS FOR TilE UNINCORPORATED ....REA OF TJiP. COASTt\L AREA PLANNING DISTRICT BY "MEND- ING THE ZONING ATLAS ,.IAP NUMBER 51-2r;-2 flY CIIl\NGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FI10lo\ -A" AGRICULTURE AND ~A-ST- AGRICULTURE SPECIAL TREATMENT TO ·PUD" PLANNED UNIT Df.VELOPM8HT ON TilE FOLLOWING DESCRIDED PROPERTY 1 PART OP NORTIIF.:AST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSIIIP 51 SOUTII, fV\HCE 26 EAST, AND DY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ~OOK 061 PACE6S9 Pago IS ___:---- _____ - - --:-_ _______-.___ - - --- -- - - - ~ I . . ~ , ''''''^--'''''''-;~''''~. ...-..."....."..""""-. - - - --- - ------.----- ------------ ----.. Mny 26, 1981 PETITION R-OO-42C, SEAGO GROUP, INC., REPRESENTED BY INK ENGINEERING, INC., REQUESTING REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AG "CYPRESS IIE^D· - DENIED Legal notice having been published in the Naplc!! Dally NOWB on , ' \ ^pri1 24, 1981 as evidenced hy Affidavit of Publication filod with tho Clerk, public hearing wa~ oponed to consider potition R-BO-~2C, filed by tho Soogo Group, Inc., requosting rezoning from various zonas to ·PUD· Plannod Unit Development, for property located botween Old and Now US 4l, and known as ·Cypross Hcnd". Planner T.eo T.ayn& located tho proporty on the map displayod, pointlns out th.,t caat of tho f1ubject proporty, ia zoned Industrial, 60uth i3 zoned Commorcial, part of the property to tho cast is also zoned Agrlcultl,ro, including some of the proporty to the west, which ~lBo has some ~GRC· zoning. She Goid that the Coastal Arca Planning Commission hold their public hoaring on May 14, 1981 and that the petitioner had only ono point of disagrcement with the Star! Report, that baing tho roquiromont of the Utility Divi~ion that s~wor systom development chargos ~UBt bo paid by tho petitionor prior to the !ssuance of building permits. The C^PC did not feel that this was a legitimate stipulation, said Ma. Layne, since the petitioner is providing his own sewage troatment plant. lIowever, she continued, it was pointed out by the Utility Division that It is the requirement of the pertinent ordinance and that it is being paid by other developments Buch a8 Imperial and Victoria rark, the fees to be used for plant expannion only and is to tho beno!it of tho petitIoner. She noted that a ~emorandum has been received from UtIlities Managor Irving eerzon ~oo~ 061 rACE 67f Page 16 .... -..-- - -'-' .--..-... ~ -......- .-....-....... ._....._....._.-...._~----_.__._._--.- ... .... ...-.-.... ~ ~ - ------- -------------------------_..~-- MD~ Oöl PAct 67Z May .26, 1981 pertaining to the matter and suggesting that tho lasuo be clarified during the Board's hearing. County Attorney Pickworth inquired if the dev~loper's aewage treatment system will eventually be hooked into tho County's North N.!Iples' system with Me. La yn. .!Idvising thð t, in the PUD documen t, there ia a statQlllent that they will connect so, apparontly, there 18 a requirement to this effect. Attorney Pickworth co~mented thðt, In such event, It would not be fair to allow the devolopors to "skip" tho development charges. Mr. JameB Jack, Ink Engineering, Inc., representing the petltioner, explained that they wera not familiar wi~h tho requirement' being discussed and that they wanted to be assured that their ~ituation is the same as others. If so, sðid Mr. Jack, they will go along and accept it. Mr. Jock pointed out thðt thoro is no guarantoe that tho County's system will bo extendod to the site, although it i8 understood that long-range projection3 aro that it will be but that it could be five to eight ye"rs into the future. He said that they :'Iave no objection to paying thoir due share of tho development fees but that they ðrc concorned about paying the fee "up front". It is felt, said Mr. Jack, that it would bo appropriate to pay such foes when thcy have the bonefit of tho system and not at tho same time they ore paying for their own facility. Chairman Pistor mentioned that one of the major concerns is that funds are availðble for the development of tho treðtment plant, and tho like. Responding to Cornmi8ßionor Kruse, Mr. Bcrzon said that tho stIpulation in no different than for any other devolopment. Mr. Jack observed that, in this cnae, they would not argue that they should be Page 17 '.. , ----- - --------------- ---- ----_.--- , , . , . ,.---, - ...----, I 1 -----... -., -- --,,---_....'. ___ ---J____ _ ________--:0-_______ ____ __ _ _ _.. Ma y 2 1;, 1 9 81 treatod otherwise and, in reoponse to Chairman Piator, said that they will ðgroe. Ms. Layno read tho pertinent portion of tho PUD documont indicating tho developor's willingnooð to comply. Thoro wan no further discussion, whoreupon Comminsioner Wenzel movod, secondoð by Com~isðioner Brown and unanimously carried, that tho public hearing bo cloned. Comm1ooioncr Wenzcl moved for donlol of the petition, motion latcr withdrawn when Commisoioner Brown moved for approvÐl. Commissioner 3rowo's motion died for lack of ð second. Commisnlonor Wenzel again moveù that tho petition bo denied with the comment that there arc no funds for schools, ronda, Courthouse oxpansion, lInd the like, provided. Com,¡issloner Wil!1cr sqcondcd the motion which carried 4/1 with CommIssioner Brown voting in opposItion. RESOLUTION 81-l39 RE Pf.TITION V-81-10C, M.T. CLUB, INC., REQUESTINC SETBACK VAnIANCF.S FOR CON;,TRUCTION OF C^RPORTS AT M^nCO T~~ER5, ISLES OF CAPRI - ^DOPTED Logal notice having been pUbl1siJed in the Naplcs Daily News on May 10, 1901 as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to ~onsidcr Petition V-BI-lOC, filed by the M.T. Club, Inc., requesting a variance from the required 34' side and 35' front yard setbacks in order to locate cðrporta 5' from tho side lot linos and 10' from the front property line. Zoning Director Perry explained that Marco Towers Is an existing 8 story condominium at the southernmost end of the Isles ot Capri and that the petitioner foels that tho proponod location of the corports will be moro aOBthet1cally ploasing and will disturb the loaot amount of exiatin9 mature V09ctation. He referred to tho ExecutIve Summary BOOK 001 PAGE 673 l.- . Page 1 e ----------------,---------------_.. ; ~ . - - - - -- - - ---- - .--. - - - -.. -- -- -- - -- -- - - -- --þ---- &OOK 001 PACE 674 May 26, 1981 dated April 27, 1981, with the accompanying sketches, to provide ~or. dotails on the project and .lso commented thnt the petitioner hae obtained lotter's of "No Objection- from the adjoining proporty ownor. to the proposed carport. Mr. Porry further advised that the Iales of Capri Fire District ^ðvisory Board, having reviewed the request, stated in their letter dated March 26, 1981 to the petitioner that they prefer the location of the structures in the site being suggested rather than in t.he middle of tho parking ðrea tor eoso in' responding to e~er- gancie. . County Manager Norman reported that Mr. Jack Wenner, representing the H.T. Club, w~s present but declined the opportunity to addrcss the Board. Commissioner Wimer moved that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Wenzel soconded the motion which carried unanlmously. CommIsnionor Wimer moved, oeconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried by unanlr.1ou8 vote, that Rosolution ,81-139, relðtive to PetitIon V-8I-lOC, be ðdopted. " Page 19 --~-------'-------------r--------- . , '''-', - ~ '"l ~ --.., , - , __ _____ _ __ _ _.._ _________ ___________-1. MlI Y 2 Ii, 1 9 8 1 JOINT "~SOLUTION AND ACRCEMBNT 01-140 FOR EXTENSION OF CAPRI WhT~R WORKS, INC. fR!lNCllrSr. TO SERVE CREATIVE LANE APARTMENTS I"nOJECT - hDOPTr.D PURSUANT TO STAFF R~COMMENnATION Logol notice having bean published in tho Naples Daily News on Mðy 10 and 17, 1981 aD evidonced by ^f!idllvit of Publication filod with tho Clerk, public hooring waD opened to consider tho roqucst by tho- Capri Watcr Works, Inc. for lIn extension of their frllnchine area to include the CrclItlvQ Lðno Apartments project area. Utilities Manðger Irving Berzon roferred to aðrial photographs to point out tho existing FranchiEc arells liS wall as the ðreaß being propoaod for expansion for the Creative Lane Apartmonts project liS well liS for the Quail's Roost project, which,will be ~ddresged later. The Executive SummDry dated MlIY 13, 1981, sðid Mr. Berzon, provides the statistical data with regard to the cðpacity of the utility, and the like. iJc noted that represontativos from tho utility firm woro in the audioncft to provide ~dditlonal Infor~ðtion on the lIvailability and adequacy cf thu water supply. When asked by Commissioner Wenzel for his opinion as to whether or not he believos there is sufficient supply, Mr. Bcrzon roplied thllt, based on the infvrmation available, he would say "ye's·, adding that there would bo no Eurplus. Mr. Berzon said he bases his opinion on - 1) The utility will, hopofully, be purchased by the County in the near future7 and, 2) It not purchased, the franchise-holder has the potentilll for increasing the treatment fllcility lInd tho groundw~tor supply to improve their reserve capacity. Chairman Pintor com~cntcd on the restriction5 prosently in effect in the Franchise area pertaining to sprinkling and inquired about who is to blðme it wDtcr cannot bo supplied. County ^ttorney pickworth responded that tho utility haG the obligation to p:ovide the service, BOOK 001 PAGE 679 po1qe 20 -----:-------- --.------:-----'-----------'"" ~ \ -- - -. -- - - . -. -.. . ... ... -. .. . __4 ._ ...._ __...__..... . .. _ -__..__.__,.._______..____.._ BOOr. 001 PACE 680 Ma y 2 6 , 1 9 81 adding that the granting of the Franchiso doe. not warrant that the water is thore. Thoro was a discus.ion concerning the shortage of water during which Mr. Berzon ooid that steps are beinq taken to improve the pumping facilities which should provide 80me rclief to tho area. However, he said that the problem is not the availability of water into the house but rather the amount which is being used for irrigation purposes which is beginnin~ to be felt allover the County duo to the drought. Messrs. Fred Partin, Paul Endris and Attorney Robert Neina., all representing the utility co~pany, were preaent to respond to the concerns which have been expressed. Mr. Partin agreed with Mr. ~crzon's stntements, commenting that the normal consumption has doubled bocause of the sprinkling activities. He said that authorization has been given by the Board of Directors to engage an engineor for the purpose of provIding recommendDtions for improvements to the pumping c~pacity in order to make suro that the problem does not occur during the next dry season. Mr. Neinoß said that the Capri Water Works has had ð moratorium on new hookups for the past three years. The utility is unjor pre-existing obligatIon to serve both of the aforemcntionod projects and it is felt that thore is suffIcient watcr available, based upon the developments' projected needs, until such time DS the County taken over the utility. Commivsioner Wenzol moved, secondod by CommissIoner wimer and cnrried unnnimously, that the public hearing be closod. Commiosloner Wimor moved, oeconded by Commißsionor Brown And cDrriod ~/l with Commissioner Wonzel voting in opposition, that the staf! recommendation be approved, i.a. based on the information mAde Pogo 21 ---------~---------------------------- , "'···....~I ,--., , I - -------------------------------_....~ Mðy 26, 1981 available by tho Utility, the Franchise should be o~tondoð as requastod ðnd be limitod to 230 dwolling units, the demand of which the Utility ia presontly able to moet, and, that Resolution and ^greement No. 81-140 authorizing the extension bo adopted. PAgO 22 ~OOK 001 PAGE 681 ---,,---.- -- -- - - --------:-------------- -- -. ~ , ------------------------.--.. .,... - -.-.... BOOr- G01 PÂGE 684 Ma y 2 6, 1 9 81 JOINT RESOLUTION AND AGREEMENT BI-14l FOR EXTENSION O~ CAPRI WATER WORKS, INC. FRANCHISE AGIH:EMENT TO SERVE QUAIL'S ROOST pnOJECT - ADOPTED PURSUANT TO STAFF RECOMMENOATION Legal notice having buen published in tho Naples Daily Hews on May 10 and 17, 1901 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hoaring was oponod to consider the extension of the Capri Water WorKa, Inc. Franchise area to include thQ Quail's Roost project. There wore no porsons registered to Bpeak on the matter and, due to the subject having been discussed in conjunction with the previous agenda item, Commissioner Wimer moved that the public hoarin9 be closed. Tho motion was seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and unanimously carried. CommIssioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/1 wIth COr.\missioncr \-lenze1 voting in opposition, that the staff recommendation be approved i.e. based on the Information provided by tho Utility, the Franchise be extendod to include the Quail's Roost project with the stipulation that the Agreement dated May 2, 1974 betwoen the Utility nnd tho property owner, at that time, be reviewed by the County Attorney 'and Ddjudged binding upon the County, and, that Resolution and Agreer.\cnt 01-141 authorizing the extension be ðdopted. Pðg8 23 - - -- - ----------'--~----.--------r---- "...,._'-"'~\ """--"'-f I ' , ---' ~.~............., I -----' --' '''~~,'".",,'~''.'''.'<-' '.',',"" - - - -~ - - -- - - - - - - - - --:. - - - - -- -- - -- - - -- --. May 2(" 1981 ORDINANCE 81-29 RE PETITION R-81-4C, WYNDEMERE FARMS, REQUESTING lIMENDMENT TO NOf1TIII'IEST POnTION OF W'x'NDr.r.Ef1E PUD - ADOPTED, SUBJECT TO 8TI PUL^TIONS, INCLUDING TIIO~ìf~ OF UTILITII:S ~'ANAGr;f1 Loglll notico havIng been publiaheð in the Naples Daily Naws on April 24, 1901 as evidenced by ^ffidavit of Publication filod with tho Clark, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-OI-4C, filod by Wynðemcro Forms, requesting an ðmendment to the Northwest Portion of the Wyndemero PUD. Planner Lee Layno saId that tho petit10ner is proposing the amendment to the PUD to allow 36 townhouses rather than 20 sIngle-family homes around the Inke and preserve the area at a density of approximatoly 1.5 units por acre. shc locðted the Hp~cific arcn in question on the map dIsplDy~d. The Coastal Area Planning Commis1ion rocommondcd forwarding the petition to tho Aoord for approval, said Ms. lAynE:, and ðdded that ð memorandum dated Hay 22, 1981 has been recoived from the Utilities Manager roquesting that the following stipulations bo included in tho staff recommendations for Board consideration: a) All on-sito water distribution ðn~ sewage collection facilities shðll be deeded to thu County prior to any connections being made to these facilities. b) All ðpplicahl~ nyatam development charges for wðtcr and sewor shall be paid prIor to the issuanco of 6ny building .permits; this in full compliðnce with appropriate County Ordinances (prcsently Ordinance No. 80-94 - Water). c. Compliance with Article ll, Section 2; requirement for blank utility casin~s should not bG w~ivcd. Ma. Layne read from the subject memorandum Mr. Berzon'g objection to the petition, particularly to the sentence which stotos -If a qovernmental agency serves the site, the wastewator colloction system and tho water distribution Ðnd treatm~nt facilities shall be dedicated to the 90vcrnmental agency", suggesting that the thought conveyed by BOOK 061 PAGE 687 Pa98 24 __ ___________________4_........._ __ ___ _ ___ --.... - , ------.------________ _______·.__w... _ _..... _ .~. BOOK ODi PAGE 688 Hðy 26, 1981 tho languAge i. contrary to the Subdivision Regulations wherein it i. stated that all on-site water distribution and a~wðge collection facllitieü ~ bo dedicated to the County. It was pointed out by Hs. Lðyne thAt the language in the prosent PUD document is language which waD adopted by the Board whon tho PUD wao originally afproved. Also, said Ms. Layne, the Subdivision requirement tor blank utility èasings has ðlreody been waived by the Board (or the Wyndemero project. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commi3sionor Brown and unanimously carriod, that the public hearing be closed. When requested to comment, County Attorney said that Hr. Serzon "has hit tho nail right on tho head" and suggested that the Board take clo~c noto of the comments contained in tho above-raferenced memorandum. Commissioner Brown moved, soconded by Com~iasioner Kruoe and cðrri~d unanimously, that tho Ordinanco, ao numbered 3nd entitled below, subject to stalf stipulations including those of the Utilities Manager, bo adopted and entored into Ordinance Book No. 12. onDINANCE 81-29 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, THE COMPRE- IiE!lSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOn THE UNII~CORI'OR^TED AREA OF THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT, BY AMEND- ING TilE ZONING ATL/\S MAP NUI1ßEH 49-26-1. BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FnOM "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRHlED PI10PERTYI SOUTII 3/4 OF (iECTION 19, TOWNSIIIP 49 SOUTH, nl,NGE 26 EASTl AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE D^T~ ' RECESS. 10100 ^.M. until 10.0D A.M. Page 2S .---------------------------------- ", , . ,.-.., I -' ,...----, I , '"--' ."-----¡ --..J --------------------------------- -.. Ma y 26, 1981 PETITION R-81-SC, W^LOnON SUNDSTROM, REQUESTING REZONING OF CERT^IN MARCO If,LAND PROPERTY' - IHTltDR^WN ^T nr~OUf.f,T or PETITIONEn Logal notice having boon published in the Nnplcs DlIily News on April 2~, 1981 lInd in tho Marco Island Eagle on May 7, 1981 as evidenced by ^ffidavit5 of publlcntion filed with tho Cler~, public hoaring was opened and immediately cloßod and tho petition withdrawn upon motion by CO~~i8sioner Wenzel, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0 with Commisoioner Hrown not present, pursuant to Memorðndum dated May 14, 1981 from the Planning stðff wherein it was stated that the petitioner, Waldron Sundstrom, requÐsted, during tho Coastal "rea Planning Commlßsion hearing on May 14, 1981, that the petition be withdrawn. RESOLUTION 81-142 RE Pf.TITION V-Bl-9C, Tllf. DELTON^ CORPOR^TION, REQUESTING FRONT Y'^RD SETBACK VARI^NCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF G^TEHOUSE ^T SOUTH SF-AS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, MM\CO ISLAND (CONTINUED FROM ~AY' 19, 19A1) - ^DOPTED Legal notice having been publishod in the Naples Daily Nows on May 3, 1981 and in the Marco Island Engle on May 7, 1981 ðS evidenced by Affidavits of publication previously filed with the Clerk, public hearing was continued from May 19, 1981 wIth regard to petition V-8l-9C, filed by The Dcltona Corporation, requesting a front yard setback variance to permit the construction of a gatehouse at the South Seas Condominiulo project, "\arco Island. Zoning Dlrectc~ Perry explained that, pur9uant to Board directive during the hearing on May 19, 1981, that Ð plan has boen worked out with the potitloner indicating that the subject gatchouse would be moved out of the intersoction adj~cent to tho project, a~ WAS originally proposed, and relocated toward tho front property line. Mr. 80DK 061 PAGE 689 Page 26 -- - --:-- -- - - -- - ---: --- - - --:---- - --- -.-- -- - - --- , .._---:-;---------------------------- aoo~ 001 PAGE 690 Hay 26, 1981 Perry requoÐteð that, if the plan meets with the Board's approval, that it be with the atlpulatlon that the final site plan be approved. Or, if the BOArd wi~hes to .e. the plan, Mr. Perry,said that the mðttor could be furthor continued. It was noted that the petitioner's ropre- aentativQs were not, as yet, present. Public Works ^dmlniÐt~ator/County Engineer responded affirmatively to Commissioner Wenzel's question as to whether or not the plan met with hia approval, whereupon the Commissioner4 having been informed that there were no persons registered to speak on the matter, moved that the public hearing be closed. Commisoioner Wimer Ðeconded the mo~ion which carriod 410 with Comminsioner Brown not present. In responso to Commis~ioner Wimer'3 inquiry if the aite in question would interfere with tho 5' beachwalk area which is under dispute, Mr. ßarksdnle said that it would not, adding that the plan that has been worked out io a much better one than that which was previoualy presentod. Commissioner Wenzel moved that tho revised plan be approved, and that Rcnolution BI-l42, granting tho 34' variance which placos the gatchouso on the property line of the subject project, be adopted, as recommendod by staff. The motion was seconded by Commissionor Wimer nnd carrlnd 4/0 with Commissioner Orown not present. Pago 27 --- ---------'----------------------- , , ,. ..."__....c1 I ~ =:J Ma y 2 G, 198 1 PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENT^I. cm~SULTING SEnVICES WITn SELWYN J. BEIN (CONTINUeD rTIOM M^'i 19, 19B1) - ACTION FUnTIlf.n CONTINUED UNTIL NEXT lice MEETING County Manager Norman reported th~t, pursuant to noard diroctive of May 19, 19B1, n meeting WlIS held with Selwyn J. Bein on May ?'2, 1981. lie sldd thðt the contract which was prepllred and agrced to by Mr. Bei!') io similar to tho one which the Board hocJ with Dr. Jay Ilarmic, former Environmental Consultant however, thore are two changes in- valved - one of which delIne~tes the responsibilities of the Consultant, ....hlch Mr. Norman reviewed for the Boord, and the othor chango is the deletion of formor Paragraph 7 pcrtl1inin~ to roviow of Environmental Impact Sti1tomcnts upon tho advice of the County Attorney due to the fact that the matter is covered by othor ordlnancos rnd would not bo opproprio~e for inclusion in tho subject contract. Mr. Norman said that it is being proposed that the salary roquested is $32,000 por year, or $1,640 more than the amount specified in Dr. Harmic's contract for 1979/80, commenting thllt the proposed amount is consistent with the adjusted amount which would normally have been implemented for Dr. lIi1rrnic hðd ho not reaigned. The benefit package would be the same AS was previously provided, continued Mr. Norman. Mr. Norml\n added that Mr. Boln has recently learned that he is being considered for a full deanship for all of the science departments on the campus ...·h~rQ ho is now employed - the North Campus of the Mlllmi-Dðde Community College. This would be an honor for Mr. Boln and would encompass ð substantial increase in compensðtion, said Mr. Norman and, ðG soon as Mr. Boin 10 informed, he will notify the County. It was Mr. Norman's suggestion that, if the Board RO desires, the contract can be authorIzed for execution in tho form being recommended lind, aa ~OOK Obl PACE 693 Page 20 . -_....~~-_..'~-_....-.. - -...--..-.. ._- .-.----...--.-- ._~._..- --.,.- ---.--...-......- .. \ '-""~'''';'''-''; _"""_;'8 -------- --_____-:._____________--.J___ BOOK ODl PACE 694 May 26,1981 aoon as Mr. Saints signature i. obtained, it will be "roðdy to go·. Commissioner Wenzel moved that, undor the circumstances outlined, the contract ba reconsidered at the prosent time and consideration bo given to candidate Mark ~. Benodict aa a direct County Employee undor the Pl~nning Director, without Ð contract, at a salary at $7,000 lOGs. Mr. Norman requested ~hat if the Board wishes to mako the person a atatf member, that ho be directed to proceed with tho usual process in torgs of evaluation of tho job for final salary reßourcos and personnel, pointinq out that only preliminllry screening has been done with no background investigation on any of the candidate~. Mr. Egon Hill expreosed his opposition to the hiring of outgidora when there is an excellent staff alreðdy in existoncc. However, if thore isn't such porson for the position under di$cussion, Mr. Hill suggoBtcd that a qu~lified individual bo hired as a staff member, om- phaaizing the need for the pogition. ChaIrman Pistor explained that It is somotimes necessary to hire outsiders, concurring with Commissioner Wimer's concept that, under certain conditions; a mora thorough study o~ projects can be obtnined than If done in-houso. Howevor, he oxpreosed hia concorn over hiring ð person at $1,600 more than the previous consultant was being paid and ßaid that, after a review of the rCßumes recoived, it in pOBoible one of tho other candidates has II broader viewpoint thDn the ono beIng considorod. He Baid that he would like to have the staff conduct interviews during tho period when the Board will not be ~eeting and provide recommendations on whom to hire. Mr. Norman pointod out the advantages of having a consultant for spocialized kindg of knowlodgo which Is not available in an organiza- tion. ~mong them tho fact that ð parson's judgment would not bo Gwayed pago 29 ~ ------------------~-------------~ , , , , ,........,-~ I --' ~ --....-, _""-'''"--"^''''''''',,~,,'''''''-''''<-''''' ..._,,", ~ , . _ _ __ ____ ______ _ _________ ___ ____ þ~4 May 2ú, 19B1 by preD6uro from the County Monngor or othoro 1n tho County organiza- tion, although this haD not beon ð problem in tho past. He ððid that the best protection to koop that from occurr1n9 would be tho cAreful suporvision of tho County Managor ovor what he doeD and does not do in termo of providing support and diroction for what is a very highly technical position and one where independent judgment in important. Commisaioner KrunQ pointed out that tho Board is again going ovor a matter which was discussed the ¡..reviouß wack whereIn 1I motion waG mðdc to negotiate a contract which cnrriod by n 3/2 vote. 5ho sug- gested that tho only qUQstion open to nC90ti~tlon In the $1,600 extra over Dr. lIarmic's contract which, liS was noted'by Mr., Norman, is ap- proximatoly the increoDe provided other omployeoa for cost-of-living rùiscs over a two-year np^n. Commissioner Wimer offored tho SU99~stion that, since Profossor Duin haD another job offer, that the matter be deferred until a decision hos beon made. Comrolnslon6r Wenzol restated hin motion that tho subject contract be reconsidered that tho Board consider Mr. Benedict's $7,000 or less otfer aD a direct County employeo undor the Planning Director, and a report be forthcoming in July. Chðirmon plstor eeconded the motIon. It was pointed out by,Mr. Norman that the salary that Mr. Benedict indicoted Hould bo acceptablo to him equates reasonably close to the $32,000 figure when othor benefit coste arc added in. The motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners Wimer, Kruse and Drown voting in opposition. Commissioner wimer moved that action be deforrad until tho noxt Board meeting. The motion woo seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carriod unanimously. ßOOK Ofjl PAGE 695 Pðge 30 -~----~--~-------~--------~------- . . . ~ ~--- ---- -------- ------------ - -- --- BOOK Göl PAGE 696 May 26, 1981 RESOLUTION 81-143 TO RECOVER FUNDS ExrENOtD BY COUNTY TO ABAT~ PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK C, LITTLE IlICKORY SHORES - ADOPTED Commissionor Wenzel moved, .econded by Commissioner Wimer and unani~ouGly carried, that Reoolutlon 81-143, to recovcr fundo expanded by ~he County to abato ð public nuisance on Lot 9, Block C, Little lIickory Shores, propU'ty o....ned by Char1e. E1sebough, be adopted. " paCíJe Jl --,--------------------------------- . I " ' " , : ..---, -" ¡---, :...-. ...- ---. \ __ __ ____ ____ _-A-- _ --=-_......:..,_,:-_...:.-..- ___ __ _--=.. ___ eOOK Oö1 PÂCE 698 Ma y 2 5, 19 81 RESOLUTION Bl-14~ TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 396, UNIT 12, ~^RCO ISLAND - ADOPTED Commissioner Wenzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Wimor and unanimously carried, that Resolution 81-144, to recover lunds exPended by the County to a~~te a public nuisance on Lot 2, Block 396, Unit 12, Marco Ialand, property owned by Charles F. Roberson, be ðdopt.~. Page 32 .... -.---- --------------------------- , , ", , , ':--1 Eat); ,..... ,¡.".,",'J'" , , ., , c=J · . .._"-- ----- ------- -----_--:-------- ---- ~co~ üöl f~~E 700 Mð y 26, 1981 RECOMMENDATION TO EXCHANGE EXISTING PLANNER II PO~ITION FOR I\DMINIS- TRATIVe ASSISTANT I POSITION IN DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - "ppnOVf.D Pur8u~nt to briof oxplanðtion by Community Development AdmIniatrator Terry Virta, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzol and unonimou9ly carried, that the existing Plannor II position, preQQntly vacant, be exchanged for Administrativo Asoist- ant I position in tho Division of Community Development, bo ðpprovod, , as recommonded by staff in the ~xocutivo Summary dated May 19, .1981. EXPENDITURE OF $0,500 FOR ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE WORK RE SOUTH ONf.-HALF SEWER AHr.A "8" PROJECT - AUTHORIZED' Co~misgloner Wimer moved, seconded by Commißsioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, thðt an additional expendituro of $0,500 for the field survey work and admlnistrðtive work connected with the prep~ra- tion of tho legal doscriptions for the required utility oasemonts within the South Onc-lIalf of Sewer Area "B",·be l'Iuthor1zed, pursuant to staff rpcommendation in tho Executive Summary dated May 5, 1981. "COITION OF $4,725 TO TOTAL PROJECT COST RE WILLOUGHBY ACRES WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ^REA FOR ~~INTEN^NCE OF FIRE HYDRANTS - APPROVED UtilitIes Mnnnger Irving Borzon explained that the Board is being requosted to authorize the addition of 10\ ($4,725) of the construction cost of th~ fire hydrants in tho willoughby Acres area to tho total project coat and resulting assessment of the project duo to the North NDples Fire Control District rule th~t they must receive thin amount prior to the acceptance of tho ownerahip and rcsponsibility for tho Maintenance of the hydrants. Commissioner \ilmer moved, seconded by Commiaaioner ~Ienzol and unanimously carried, that the amount of $4,725 be addod to the total project cost of the Wð'ter and Sewer Improvements in tho Willoughby Pðg 0 33 .... -- -- - ---- ------------------------ .' -l c=J :=J --- - ---- -.--- ------------..--- -- -- --..., Ma y 2 6 , ~ 9 81 Acr.. area for the rcasons statod in tho Executive Summary dated May 14, 1981. Co~misslonor Wimer naið that he has roceived many calls from the area's residents who aro much ðppreciativo of tho wðy the project has proqresaed with a minimal amount of problems. lie expressed his thanks to everyone involved. UTILITY EASEMF.NT FOR l\UGUSTA \"00D5 CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AREA - l\CCEPTED¡ RECORDATION MJTIIOTU7.ED Following brlof cxpl~nation by Utilitlos Manager Borzon, Commissioner Wenzcl moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that tho Utility Easement document for tho Augusta Woods Condominium project arCD, in ardor to permit the installation of ð water meter to sorve the prbject, be accepted and authorized for recording in the Official Rocords. ~oax Oö1 fACE 701 PA90 34 ---------------------------------. \ _ _ _ --:..- _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _...1..-_ _-...:...-- ---"'- - - - -- - -------- 6CO~ 001 PAGE 704 Hay 26, 19B1 UTILITY EASEMENT FOR TH~ HAMPTONB, KINGS LA~E UNIT 1 - ACCEPT!D, RECORDATION AUTHORIZED Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Com~la8ion.r Kruse and cðrr10d unanimously, that the Utility Easement documont for The Hamptons, Kings Lðke Unit 1, primarily for the installation of a water ~etQr to serve the project, be accepted and Authorized for recording in the OffIcial Records, pursuant to staff recommendation. (Easement not received in Clerk's office as of 6/10/81) '- Page 35 .~ --------------------------------- , . ", :::=J c=J ;-. -, , "-----" --- -- - --------------------- -----.,.- May 26, 1981 WATER AND SEHER F^CIT.ITIES WITIIIN THE RF.TRF.^T PHASE I - lICCP.PTED POR ONE 'iE^R MW'rEN^NCE1 rn:COrWATION OF Pf.flTINf:NT DOCUMENTS - ^UTJ!OnIZED As recommonded by the Utilities MDnager, Commissioner Brown movod that the Hator ~nd ~Qwer Facilitioß within Tho Retreat Phoso I be acceptod for one-year maintonanco, and that the legal documents bo authorlzed for rocording in the Official Records. Following a brief discussion regarding the pay~cnt of impact fees during which Mr. Berzon advised that ouch foes are not collected until Building Permits Are roquested, the motion wns seconded by Commissioner WImer and unanimously carried. !he following liot of documents was Eubmitted to tho Clerk's office for recording 1 1. Bill of Sale for the Water Facllities. Blll of Sale for the Se we r Facilities. Quit-Claim Deed for the \o!ater FlIcllities. Quit-CIa im Dced for the Sewer Facil1tic3. ^ffidavit of No Liona for the Water lInd Sewe r Facllitica. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Certification from the DER for bactoriological clearance for tests on the wator lines. 7. Lab results on the bacteriologicðl testß for the water lines. 8. Certification concerning contributions in-aid of any conatruction. 9. Results of pressuro testing of the w~ter lines. 10. ^ copy of the inflow/infiltration te8t~ for the Bewer linea. 11. Results of pressure testing of. the sewor lines. Verification of final cost tor the newer 8Y8tem~ Verification of flnc'1l cost for tho Wð ter lines. Leg a 1 doacr i ptlon. 12. 13. 14. BOO~ 001 rAGE 705 Page 36 ---~-------~-----~~-~-----------_.. . , ·- - --- - --- - -- -- - ------'-----------------"--- BOOK Obl PACE 706 Moy 26, 1981 15. Contractual Guarant.. for material and workmanship for Q period of at leaat one (1) year ðfter the Boord of County Commisaioners' acceptanco for both water and sewer facilities. 16. tAtter from the Firo District regarding ownership and maintcnance of fire hydrants. 17. Lettor from the Engineer of Rocord cortifying that all wðtor and sewer facilities are located within the public right-ot-way or dcdicatod eascments. 18. Letters tram the Engineer of Record certifying that all water and sewer facilities are constructed in substantial compliance with tho plans Ðnd specifications and as shown on the "As-Built" drawings. 19. Payment of wator uß~ge charge for filling and flushing water, numbcr of times filled and flushed, plus total number of gallons used. 20. Recorded easement granting ri~ht-of-wðyn to lines and/or system within private propcrty i5 on the rocorded plat. 21. One (1) set of 1\s-[\ullt Drawings. 22. Copy of the recorded plat. NOTE: See documents on pages 709-712 RESOLUTION GW-Bl-5 APPROVING WATER PURCII1\SE AcnEE~IENT BETWEEN GOODLAND W^TER SYSTEM AND DELTON^ UTILITI~5, INC. - ADOPTf.D Commissioner Wenzcl moved, ,seco~ded by Commissioner Wimer and carried by unllnimous vote, that j'~e30lution CW-8l-5, approving tho Water . Purchase Agrocment between the Goodland Water Syatnm and Doltona Utilities, Inc., be ~l'dopted, pursuont to recommendation by Utilities Managor in his Exccutivo Summary dated May 13, 1981. PlIlJO 37 .:--,..--- -----------------.------------ , " . ' , . ';-"! c::::J :---, --' --""-"~",.~",,,,,-,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,, .... , , ---------'-------------------------- May 26, 1981 ^DDITION^L ~XPENDITURE~ TO COV~R CONSULTING ENGINEER'S FEES RE GOODL^ND W^TEn SYSTEM PROJECT - APPHOVED, PUH;'UANT TO STAFF' nf.CO/',~IEI,ID^TION Pursuant to explanation and recommendation by Utilities Manager Bcrzon, an contnlned in the Executive Summary dated May 13, 1981, Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commisioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, that additional expenditures to covor tho Consulting Engineering fees, with regard to the Goodlðnd Water Systom projoct, be approved for tho topo ðnd boundary aurvey ($2,000.OI), ûnd for obtaining the v6rioua permitß ($1,524.86), which were necessitated due to rclocating the site from tho ~irk property in Coodland to the DOT propcrty at the Goodlond Bridge. CHANGE ORDEn NC,. 3 IN TilE MIOUNT or: $G, 000 TO PROVIDE FOR MODIFJ~^TIONS TO EDUCTOR-AIR BLOWEr! ST1ITIONS WITHIN ,.'ARCO SEh'ER PHASE I IMPROV¡:"IENT AREA - APPROVED Utilities Managcr Borzon commentcd that there has been some dis- pleasure voiced with the appcaranco of the eductor-air blower stations within the Marco Gewer Phase I Improvemont aroa and that the approval of Chango Order No.3, in th~ amount of $G,OOO, will provide for making certain changes to tho installations, permitting them to be lower and consequently lcss con£picuoua. In rcsponse to Commis9ionor Wenzel, Mr. Berzon said that the pipes can onl¡ be landscaped up to ð reasonable hoight, noting that the way the pipes are stacked now they go up 7' to 8t abovo the existing ground and, therofore, ~and8caping is difficult. The r~commendation, said Mr. Borzon, in Cor authorization of the estimated amount at monoy and added that the costs will be kapt down to less thðn that if possible. Commissioner wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel, that Change Order No.3, aD dotailed above, b. approvod in the amount ot $6,000. 'BOOK Oöl fAGE 713 ra g ~ 38 ..--------------------------------- --- , -------------------------------- BOOK Oól,PAGE 714 Mo Y 26, 1961 Mr. Ira Evðns, reproÐenting the Marco Island Taxpayers' Msociðtion, asked that opprovol o! tho Change Ordor be deforrod or, 1! Approved, that it bo conditionðl on the proposed correction being discusoed with the people whc arc directly affected. "0 8uggosted that, perhaps, thore are other altornðtivos availablo and that the poople ðro entitled to have Gomo "say· on how it is done. Part of the problem, Goid Mr. Evana, was that no one was aware that such "things· wero part of the installation and evary e!fort should be made to ðccommodate tho way tho people f~el the situ~tion should be corrected. Furthormore, said Mr. Evans, he would ask that approval be conditioned on a careful segrcgation of the costs sinco tho sðma options existed at the timo the sYGt~m was designed and the costs to correct the condition is not propcrly ð part of tho assossment to the individuðls and the aSGessmcnt district. Chairman Piator said that ho understands Mr. Evans' state~ent8 ðod assured him that the matter has boen under investigation for several months. Commissioner Wimer said that, if Mr. Evans hoc an objection to tho motIon on the floor, he would withdrð~ it. Mr. Evans reiterated his opinion that thoro is more than one way of accommodating the problem and rCllowed his rcquest that the various options be discussed with the tlpproximatcly l2 paoplo involved. Commisslonor h'cnzel moved that Mr. Borzon and the EnginQcr get together and talk to the affected individuals and prasent their proposal for approval. Thore was no second to the motion. Mr. Borzon said that Mr. Evðns is corroct, at least in one respect, In that there is another option - the contrast betweon what is being proposed and thðt option being 8pproxi~ðtely $30,000. The option, h~ said, is to rolocate thn facilities to the rear of the lot Page 39 ---------------------------~--~--- '. , . ..-.....--- .---, , -- 'It.,' .____________________------.-----------. . . . . . , . --- - - ---- ----- ---------------_...._-~. Mo Y 2 G, 19 A 1 linos. lie quoßtioned where Mr. E....ano woulr1 suggest that payment for the additional canto come from. ~~en asked by Commissioner Wenzel, ~r. Evans oaid that he waD not one of tho 12 individuals affected. The Commissioner offered a motion that the mattcr be tableò if that was thu dosire at the Board. Thoro was no GQcon(\ing of tho r.1otion. Mr. Williðm Barton, representing the,Consulting Engineoring firm of Wilson, Miller, Bôrton, SolI L Peck, Inc., said thot he would bo glad to confor with the property ownersl however, he said that it would be appropriate for tho Board to approve the propoa~l. He said that the reason it was not done in such manner originally was because, from an engineering point of view, it is less desirable becðuGo it 1s going to raise the maintenance costs somewhat, explaining why this is so. He ßaid that it was an accoptable trade-off rocognizing that aesthetics '~ust be considered. It w~s Commissioner Wimer's suggestion that the people decide if they wish to havo the pipes relocated and pick up the assessment involved. Mr. Barton obsorved that such ðcsessment would be spread over ð number of people on Marco Island to satisfy a fewl however, that i9 a docision Cor the ßonrd to make. Commil!lIsionar Wimer declineù to offer Q new motion, whereupon Commiosioner Drown ~ovod that the Board authorize an oxpenditure of up to $6,000 to revise the air intake system on tho blowor stations 80 that they aro les8 offensive than they Are at present. Commissioner Kruso seconded the motion. Mr. Berzon r'enowt'ð his offer to meet with any of the persons involvod and try to convince them that the stop being proposed is a step in the right direction and, in responso to Commisaioner Kru~e, t>DD~ Ofil PÀ~ 715 Page 40 . , . .. -... - - .._.. .,--- --... ...-.... - - .- - -. . -...... --.. -...... - ...- .,." . '-- --- .-. - - - - -- BOOK 0 DiPACE 716 Ma y 26, 1961 aaid that there aro ð total of 720 users in the ent1re project. COlli" missioner Xrusc offered the comment that ahe "would hate to have to .~ddle them with $30,000·. Upon call for the question, tho motion carried by unanimous vote. Co~mi8sioner Wimer offered the suqgestion that funds be put into the budget for landscaping purposes. , . . =:J C3 ..--------------------------------- Page 41 :=J -- - ------ ------------- ----.------ --_.~_.. BOO~ 001 rACE 718 May 26, 19B1 RESOLUTION 01-145 RE UTILIZATION OF GOOD WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES DURING CURRENT DHOUGHT - ^DOPTED County ^ttorney pickworth o~?lainod that tho proposed resolution has been drafted pursuant to Boord request which he said rec09nizea the present drought and urgos the citizenry to voluntaril~ reduce their consumption of water and to institute good wator conservation practIcesJ and requesting the Bi9 Cypress nasIn Bonrd of the South Florida Water Management District, togethor with the District, to examine the 8Itu~tIon and impose mandatory reductions i£ they deem it necessary. Commissioner Wonzel moved, seconded by CommIssioner Wimer and unönimously carried, that Resolution 81-14S, as dotailed above, be adoptod. " , Page 42 T--------~------~---~--~--------- , ", r=-l c::J r--\ ..- , ' ...____________-.600____.a...-______________ , MO~ Ob1 fAr¿ 720 May 26, 1981 DIGCUSSION OF WATER PREGDURE PROBLEMS ON MARCO ISLAND - REPORT ON AVAILABLE OPTlmlS TO fH: fORTIICOMING AT NEXT BCC MF:ETING Commissioner Wimer co~mented that, in view of the sevoro water pressure problems on ~rco Islanð, perhaps oomething should be dono to restrict Borne building there until the ßituation is corrected. utilities Manllger Borzon s'aid that, in the ðpplicðt'I~¡1 review proceeo, factual information is so ug h t out ond, in the case of Marco Iolðnd, tin in-depth analysis wile done of what the wðtor resource cðpðbllity Is, bllsed primarily on the r e po r t prepðred by groundwater geolog 1sts Missmer and ASBociatos. It is their contentIon, continued Mr. Berzon, that there are up to 14,000,000 gallons of water available, however, there is not that much treatment cDpability nor trðnsmission capability at tho prosent time. It is arguod that Marco Island is running out of water for the sarnO reðsons that the Isles of Capri people are running out, he said, and that is the ðmount of water being used for irrigation purposca. He suggested that It is a le~al question as to whethcr or not the Board can restrict any building pormits because the irrigation demand the public is placing on the system cannot be satisfied. He ê,said that the pormitting agoncy for the utility's consumptive use pormit, tho South Florida Wator Managemont District, met with repre- sentatives of Dcltonn the previous week and, apparently, could not find adequate ovidence thDt they could not meet the demand. lie added that when the agency feels that there is l\ thre~t to the groundwater supply, either through soltwater intrusion or through othor stresS08 on the RYHtem, tho people will bo told to cut back mandatorily. Pðg It "3 ~_._------------------------------- '-"--'~'."'\ _.,-~ I , _I ,...--¡ - ------------------------'----'------- May 26, 1981 Co~mi8sionor WImer said thAt ho would like to 80e tho situation rectified and that he is willing to stop ~ll multi-family and com~ mercial building permits until the utility fulfills its obligation,to build ~n adequðte water treatment system. County Attorney Pickworth advised that the proposal ~ight be an approach the Boðrd could take, howover, ho cautioned that it would bo the type of thing that would bo the end product of a thorough investigation wherein the Boord would have justifichtlon for concluding that such action is necessary. Tho diacußslon continued covering such aspects as the reported leakages in the ßystem and the claim that they havo boen corrocted, whether or not consideration h~s been given to a dual syatem for transmitting trcated and untreated water for irrigation purposos, tho fact that tho Basin Board has said that they would request only voluntary and not compulsory curtailment, and other pertinent facets of the problom. Commissioner \oiimer moved that there be a full report on tho subject at tho noxt meeting, whore time for a lengthy discussion is available, and that no building per~its for multi-family or co~mercinl purpoacs bo issued on Marco Island until that time. Attorney rickworth commented that he does not think ·you can make that stIck", adding that he could 'do some research on it. Commissioner Kruse inquired if a rostriction could be imposed, through the Building Department, to enforce the installation of water-nnving devices on any new construction. Commissioner Wenzcl observed thl1t the Building Code could be revised in this regard. Attorney Pickworth said that there ðrc various regulations which tho government can put into effoct, howovor, the water-saver approach is aoOK 001 PAGE 72f P~g e 44 _h_~-__~-__-_~---~~--~---~_~------· ~ , -~-----------~-~-----~-~--~--~--- ~ooy. 001 PAGE 722 Me y 26, 19 a 1 ~oro legally dofonsible than ð building moratorium. Commißsioner Wi~er said that tho problem of the leck of water on Marco Ioland has been ongoing and he is willing to take whatever riaka are necessary to force oeltona to correct the situation and asked that the record reflect this and, also, that his motion to this effect dlod for lack of a Gocond. Chairman plstor emphaslz~d hio desiro to take whatever action p050ible to k~ep from running out of water on Marco Island but expressed his concorn over posnlble legal ramifications involved in ð mO~ðtorium. Mr. Berzon said that he would havo a report at the next meeting on whatever options aro avaIlablo. RESOLUTION 81-146 RE PETITION V-81-5C, RACQUET CLUß OF NAPLES, REQUESTING 5ETDACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF SIGH - ^DOPTED FOLLOWING MOTION TO RECONSIDER, ACTION ~AKEN 5/19/81 Chllirmlln Pistor explained. that a rer¡uoB.t has been recoived from tho Racquet Club of Naplen, for rcconaideration of the Soard action taken May 19, 1981 donying Pet~tion V-B1-5C which was ð request for a 14' front yard setback varlancp 'to permit the conotruction of a sign wwithln l' of a front property line on Tamiami Troll. It was pointed out by County Manager Norman that the peti tloner was not present for tha May 19th meet!n/] and tho ßO<1rd indicated that if he came in aftor tho peti tion WðS acted upo n , he would be given tho opportunity to be heard. Mr. Norman said that the roquest for reconsideration is con- sistent with tho prior action of the coord. Dr. Ronald Stahnke, preoident of the Racquet C1~b of Naples, informed the Board that at tho prosent timo interested persons aro having difficulty finding the establishment and, for this roason, it ia Page 45 .--------------------------------- , . I , I r' ,.,'"". ~' .---; ---' , . --------------------------------- Mo y 26, 1981 deairablo to place 0 algn on tho 3' strip of lcnd on Tamlami Trail which, to his knowlodge, WðS laid out in tho plot plan for such purpooe. He said that tho e!qn would be In conformity with oxisting signs, and added that he has checked with adjacent buslnosBea and has recoived no objections to tho proposal. Zoning Director Perry recalled that, ,pursuant to the information pro5cnted the previous week in the Executive Summery, the parcel is a triangular-shapod piace of property and that the staff recommended denial of the variance because thero is ample area to move the nign bßck towards the building away from US ~1 and moot the minimum sotbßck off the Costello Drive right-of-way. It was noted by Hr. perry that the potitionor is planning to meet tho setback of US 41 but, obviously, cannot meat the required 15' setback off Costollo Drive if the proporty is only 3' deep at that location. Commissioner Wimor observed that, if the sign waD relocated as suggosted, it could not be seen. with Mr. Perry concurring with the ntatemcnt that that is the reDson for the requested variance. Commissioner Wimer said that he hOB inspected the site and moved for approval of the varlanco with Commi3sioner Brown seconding tho motion. Due to the circumstances, Commissioner Wimer withdrew his ~otion, replacing it wIth a motion for rcconniderðtion of the previous ðction. Commissioner Wenzel seconded the motion which cDrried by unðnimous vote. Commissioner' Wimer moved, soconded by Commisalonor Brown that Resolution 81-146, with rcgðrd to Petition V-8l-5C, bo odoptod. The motion cðrriod by unðnimoua vote. Page 46 WOK 061 n~m ---~--~----~-----~-~~---------~-_. ~ , --------- ----------- -- _!-- - --~------~. fl1ðy 26, 1981 FINA£. ¡\CCEPTANCE OF VMIOUS STREET!> WITIlIU MARCO ßf.l\CH SUBDIVISION - ^PPROVED Pursuðnt to stoff recommendation as contained in the Executive Summary dated MÐY 15, 1901, Comm1~sioner Wenzol moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimor and unanimously carrieð, thðt'the following streots within Marco Beach Subdivision be approved Cor fin~1 acceptance 1 , " Harfiold Drive from S.R. 92 to Wintcrborry DrIve UnIt 5 Unit 8 Wintcrberry Drive from SDrfiold Drive to South Ilea thwood Dr ive Un i t 9 CollIngswood Avonue Conover Court Cutler Court Quintllra Court Hammock court A1l1micda court salvar10rc Court Fo rc ßt Cour t ^rcad ia Court Sand Hill Street from Wintorborry to CuI-de-Sac South Heathwood Drive from Wintorbcrry Drive to Cul-de-Sac BID NO. 486 FOR CONSTRUCTION Of PEDESTRIl\N AND DIKE Pl\THS AT VARIOUS LOCl\TIONS WITHIN COUNTY - AWARDED TO M^C 1\SPIIALT, INC. IN THE N\OUNT OF $690,044.05; STAFF AUTHORIZED TO ADD ACDITION1\L PROJECTS TO STl\Y WITIIIN FUNDS AV1\ ILABLE Legal notice having been publlahcd in tho Naples Daily Newn on May 5 and 7, 1981 as evidenced by Affidavit of PubIicðtion filed with the Clerk, bids relating to Bid No. 486 wore 'received until May 20, 1981 for the construction of Pedestrian and Diko Paths at various locations within the County. Pursuant to (ecommcndation contained in the memorandum dated Mðy 21, 1981 from Engineering Director Tom Kuck, Commissioner Wanzol moved, soconded by Commissionar WImer and unanimously corricd, th~t ßid No. 406 for the aforcmontioned construction, including all of projects DW-7 Pðge 47 ßOQ~ 001 rAGE 71.7 ---~---~-------,-,--,_._--- . . ,____ __------.--------- ---------------:0 '..--- __'_ _ 1.--"'--'''------ ~- "---,---,,, ..--, ~- ~OOK OB1 PACE 7'2.8 , ~ May ~5, 1981 through BW-23, be awarded to the low bidder, MacAsphalt, Inc., in the amount of $690,844.05, that the stoft bo authorizod to add additional projects to stay within the fundI available ot $775,000.00, and, that the Board authorize tho Chairman to sign and tho Clerk to attest the resulting ^9reement. BID NO. ~R5 FOR RIGGS ROAD, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - AW~RDED TO BRISSON ENTERPRISES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF t-lf,O,524.06 Legal notice having been publlßhed in tho Naples Daily News on , May Sand 7, 19B1 as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clork, bids pertaining to aid No. 485 for roadway improve~onts to Riggs Road were roceived until May 20, 1981. /' i Pursuant to staff recommondation, as contained in the memorandum dated M~y 21, 19B1 from Engineering Director Kuck, Commissioner Wenzel moved, aeconded by Commißsioner Wimer and unanimously carried, that Bid No. 4B5 for the aforementioned project be awarded to the low bidder, Brisson EnterprisÐU, Inc., in the amount of $160,524.06, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the resulting Agreement. BOARD APPROVES STAFF RECOMHENDA'i.'ION Fon PURC!lASE OF ASPHALT PAVER, COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS WAIVED, WRITTEN QUOTATION FROM II. F. MASON IN TilE AMOUNT OF $01,520 - ,,"PPROVED public Works Administrator/Engineor Barksdalo recalled that on March 5, 1981 the 8o~rd approved a Budgot Amendmcnt in the amount of $5,000 for tho purchase of an Asphalt Paver to be used by the Road Dcpartm~nt in economically improving road and drainage condltiona. He Baid that three quotations havo been received, the lowest quotatIon being from the H. F. Mason Company in the amount of $4,520, ðS Bet Page 048 ", ':-ï ------ c:::::J ,.---, '---' ~ ----------------------------------.. " ---------.------------------------ . Mo Y 26, 1981 forth in tho momorðndum datod May 10,1981 from thø purchosing Director. Commissioner Wenzel moved, soconded by Commissioner Wimer and unanimously carried, that the BOArd accept tho staff recommendation for the pur chace of an Asphalt Pavor, waiving tho compotitive bid process, and accopting the writton quotation from H. F. Mason in the amount of $4,520, and that tho Chairman be authorizod to sign and the Clark to ottest the resulting Agrecment. PLAT OF NORTH WAPLES ItlDUSTRIAt. P^RK - ACCEPTED FOR RECOnD^TIONI PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE GRANTED, 10\ CASll BOND FOR MAINTENANCE SECURITY ACCEPTED Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksdale rccalled that tho Board approved the construction drawings and final plat for the North Naples' Industrial pork on February 24, 1981 with the stipulation that tho plot not be recordod until all construction was approved, or until adequate conatruction security was posted. Tho devolopor has completod the construction improve~ents, Baid ~r. Barksdale, and hos posted a 10\ cash bond tor maintenance security. The County Engineering Department has reviewed the construction, he concluded, and Preliminary Acceptance 18 being recommended, as requested by the developer. Commissionor Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse ond unanimouoly carried, that the North Naples Industrial Park plat be approvod,for recordin9, th^t Preliminary Acceptance of the project be granted, and that the 10\ cash bond for maintenance security bo approved. BOOK 001 PACE 729 Pa98 49 ~ , ·--------------------------------- 600~ 001 PAGE 730 Hðy '26, 1981 EXCAVATION PEnMIT NO. 59.122, KINGa LAKE UNIT III, IN n7, TSOS, R26£ - APP"OVED FOR ISSUANCE, WITH STIPULATIONS Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksd6le reviewed briefly the contents of the Executivo Summary d~ted Kay 13, 1901 pertaining to the request for an Excavation Permit for the construction of a lake which will be used tor ".!Iter retention in Kings Lðko Unit III. He noted thðt the Engineering Departmont's staff and the Water. Management ~dvisory BOArd have reviewed the ayplication and recommend approval of the \ issuance ot tho Permit with ~h. following st(pul~tion8& 1. All truck traffic to/from the excavation Is limited to the atreeta in Kings LÐke between the oxcavation and S.R. 84. 2. Tho roquired bond and permit fecs must bo remitted - BondI $15,000 pormit Foel $420. 3. No pu~ping off site. 4. All ðppliçðble provisions of Ordinðnce No. 80-26 shall be adhered to. In rcsponse to Commissioner Kruse'. query, Mr. Barksdale said that if the excavation is in an area where it is felt that there is g01ng to be a concern, monitoring the well for water quality can be ð stipula- tion however, the ,lake under discussion is a small lake and it WftS not felt to be a necesBDry requirement in this instance. " CommiBsionor Wimcr moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carriod 4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition, thAt Excavation Permit No. 59.122 be approved for issuance to Kings Lake Unit III, subject to the abovo-refercnced ðtipulationa. EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.120, EDWARD r. REYNOLDS, IN 834, T48S, R26E - APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE WIT" GTIPULATIONS Reforring to the lxocutive Summary dated May 13, 1981, Public Work:i Administrator/Engineer Barkßdalo said that a request hðs been Page 50 ----------------------~---..,-....------ , , . , ::=J c::J L-..:J __,r-------------------------... Mðy 26, 1981 recoived from F~ward F. Reynoldø for an Excavation Permit for the construction of two fish ponds, reviewing briefly the pertinent data concerning the proposed lakes. He sa id that the Engineering Departmont's staff nnd the Water Managemont Advisory Board have reviewed the application and rccommend approval of the Permit with the following stipulations: 1. Depth of excavation shall bo limited to 121 below existing ground. 2. No off-sito discharge unless permitted by South Florida Water Management District. 3. Perimeter berm shall be required. 4. All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 80-26 shall be adhered to, particularly submittal of a bond for the permit fee. Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commissioner Brown and carrIed 4/1 with Commission'er Wenzel voting in opposition, that Excavation Permit No. 59.120, for. issuance to Edward F. Reynolds, be approved, suhject to the above-referenced stipulations. RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE COMPETITIVE BID FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TO REMOVE NOXIOUS AQUATIC GROWTH FROM MAIN GOLDEN GATE CANAL BY MECHANICAL MEANS _ APPROVED¡ COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS WAIVED; PURCHASING DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER TO AQUAMARINE CORPORATION There being no discussion following Public Works Ãdministrator/- Engineer Barksdale's brief review of the subject, Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and unanimously carried, that the staff recommendation, as contained in the Executive Summary, be approved with regard to the removal of excessive and noxious aquatic plant growth in ð portion of the main Golden Gate Canal by contractual service utilizing mechanical methodS, as follows: \ Page 51 BOOK Oö1 PAGE 731 ----.......--._---_._-----~-------_._------ ~ , ·---------------------------------- ~oo~ GD1 PÂCE 732 Mo Y 2 6 , 1 9 0 1 Based upon the one-source Bupplier o~ both equipment and contract service Cor mechanical harvesting of aquatic plants, that the competitive bid procoss be waivod, and that the purchasing Director be authori~od to laBue a' purchase order to "quamarlnc Corporation on A unit prico basis in an amount not to exceod $6,000.00. RESOLUTION 01-151 "UTIIOIUZJNG CII1\IRM1\N AND CLERfI: TO EXECUTE JOINT PARTICIP1\TION AGREEMENT WITH FDOT RE PROVISION OF FUNDS FOR DeSIGN or PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM 1\ND PREPARATION OF GRANT APPLICATfONS - ADOPTED Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksdale reviewed briefly tho staff recommendation that authorization be given for tho execution of ð Joint participation Agreement with the FDOT for a grant to provide funds for Administrative Services to design a public Transportation System and to prepare grant applications for Fedoral Capital and Operating funds. Mr. Barksdale respondod negatively to Commissioner Wenzel's query an to whether thoro would be any County funds involved, and positively to Commissioner Wimer's inquiry os to whether or not a system could be desiqned to fit the County's needs. Commissioner Wimer moved, sp.conded by Commissioner Brown and unanimously carried, that Resolution 81-151, authorizing tho Chairman and Clerk to execute a Joint participation Agreement with the Florida, Department of Transportlltion, as detailed above, be adopted. County Manager Norman pointed out that the Administrative Services employee would only become a permanent member of the County staff if the Trðnsit Program is adopted ðnd that, if funding ceases, tho position is torminðted. lie furthor commented that the 528,000 salary figuro mentioned prcviously includos bonofits and related travel oxpenses. Page 52 ---------------------------~------ . . .' , . :=1 CJ --, ---- " . . .____________.a..-_______-=--___________ &OOK 0 fj 1 PACE 734; May 26, 1981 STATUS REPORT FOR COLLrr.R COUNTY F.MS BY PUBLIC S^FF.TY ^DMINISTRATOR Public Safety Administrator Hatner reviowod the highlights of tho Information contained in the Ambulance Syotum Status raport dated May 20, 1981 which covers the period from April 6 through May 7, 19B1, and covorin9 such mattera as the total number of ambulance "runs, the average responsG time, the types of runs, the vehicle status, and the numbor of personnel involved. In response to Commissionor Wimer, Mr. Hafner said that a recom- mendation will bo forthcoming wIth regord to the establishment of current foes for h~licopter trðnsport. Commissioner Kruse inquired about the status of collections with Fiscal Officer Harold Hall responding that they are coming in satis- factorily, explaining that it takes from 30 to 60 dðyS to receive payments, normally, which, for the most part, are insurance paymenta. Commissionor Wimer asked if the prcsent stationing of the ambulances is working out with Mr. Hafner stating that there ore only about 6 woeks of statistics available on the runs and, with a sample that small, it io difficult to make 8 decision at the present timG. However, said Mr. Hafner, as the roport shows, the response time in the City ie probably among the beet in tho State, adding that the rosponsos average well below the 10-minutes contractual figure. Mr. Mike Zewalk inquired if the public has been mado aware that, even though the County has taken avec the system, thore is no -free rido.. Mr. "afnor oxplainod thAt the appropriate persons are being billod just as 1. done in a private organization with the 8ame collection proceedings. County Attorney Pickworth added that It 18 tho intent of tho County to fUe suIt, ,If necossary, in small Chims Court, rag- 53 ------------,...----------------------.-- . . ., ", . . . . 'C=J r-:::-J ~ ~ -----.-- ----------------------------... May 26, 1981 os is ~oin9 done with rogard to the collection of sewor bills, and the 11ko. Ch~!r~ðn pistor stðted that, 1n his opinion, the ~bulance D1cICLGC, the EMT'a and Para MedicR, and othor personnel involved, are doing a Line job, as the report 6hows, and inquired if there Is any indicuLlon when the other two vehicles will be dolivored. Mr. Hafnar aðid, t.hat, In his oBtimatotlon, it will be a minimum of eight weeks b~fotO delivery can be expected. 'eOM~D !\!JTI10RIZES PUflCn"f,E OF NECESS^n'i SUPPLIES "'ND EQUIPMENT FOR EMS /IIW I'!(¡:p,\nATION OF DUDGET AMr.ND~f.NT5 Public Safety Adminlstrðtor Hafner 'exploined that thore 1s a Ust o( equipment which is still being retained by American Ambulancr, Inc. and is tho subject of litigntlon between the County and the firm. However, said Hr. Hafnor, some of the equipment is of a critical nature and is nceded at once, citing exempleu such as two Mðrs light bars with siren ùnd control heods which aro needed for tho Supervisor's and DIreclor's cors, and one Motorola mobile radio with scannor. County ^ttorney pickworth said thl1t he and the firm's attorney have been fighting a -lotter war" over the issuo for Bome time and said that, ev~n 1f a lawsuit was instigated, it 18 doubtful that the matter could be resolved before the court in less than two woeks. H8 said that Hr. Hafner hae advised hi~ that even two woeks is too long and, therofore, it ",3. hie recommendation to Mr. Hafner that he find an alternative solution and back-charge whatevor it coats to ~erican AIIbulllnc8. ~OO;( OBl PACE 735 '890 54 :~ 1t ... ..._._ _... ___.'__' ... .._...__..-_______....._~....__.._____...___.'"_.,ø.._.._..._.___..._....--.--.-..-'.... 4 , I, . I I I ! ì I ~ ,I ¡ I I ¡ I f I ..----------- -----------.-.---------. ~oo~ Got PAtE 136 Mðy 2&, 1981 County Manager Norman sU9gested that a declaratlon of emergency i. not necessary, however, aince all of the items mentioned, individually, will C08t over $2,000 Board authorization i8 necessary to .ffect the budget amendments to follow. Commissioner Wimer moved, .econded by Commls.loner Wenlel ond unanimoualy carried, that the staff be authorized to purch... whatever supplies and equipment are necessary to have "everything up to par-. , STATUS REPORT BY ST~rF ON STATUS OF TERMINATION OF AMBULANCE MANACEMENT AGREEM!NTS WITH AMERIC~N A~BULANCE, INC. County Manager Norman informed the Board that he, Fis~al Officer fIllll ðnd County Attorney Pickworth have reviowod the status of the Agree~ont to terminate the 1975 Ambulance Management Contract and the Board action to terminate the 1980 Contract effective April 6, 1981. In su~mðry, said Mr. Norman, the Exec~tive Summary dated May 22, 1981 lists all of the known i~sue8 to be addressed in each of the items. With regard to tho 1975 Contract, Mr. Norman said that there ate two m4~ters which are still not final in terms of the amounts involved - one of which is Unreported Revenues which have been disclosed ln con- junction with the invo8tigðtion work which is ongoing by the State'. Attotney's office, and tho othor Is the claim submitted by American Ambulance on ^pril 30, 1981 which is presently bein9 checked by the auditor who perfor~ed the tormination audit. Addressing the 1980 Contract, Mr. Norman said that final amounts on the various items listed aD ðue to American Ambulance, Inc., aa well as the amounts duo to Collier COUl\ty, have not been received as Yflt but ahou14 be available tho following week. He said that the ·botto~ 11n.- Is that, before all of the information is released to the Board for Pa98 55 ._----------------~--------.........---,----- I . ' , .. 'CJ 1" ----; -' -- ~ \ :\ " ,t· " :1 :; ~ ¡ 'I ·1 I ¡ II 'I II 11 :1 ;1 :¡ . í: i' i I 'i ¡ ¡\ '" " '. " 'i II 'I Ii '\ II I ~ ,I :¡ II ìi (' ;1 It :t !' Ir' ..----- -- ---- - ------ ----- ----- -- --- Ma y 2 G, 1 9 8 1 thoir d.ter~ination, it should be furnished to American ~bulanco for thoir review and discussion as has been done on other mattera in tho past. Com~!øGioner Wimer inquired about the amount of ~oney being held by tho County relative to the 1975 Contract. Following a brief dis- cussion, Cl~rk W1lliam Reagan snid that $9,000 1s tho amount billod to the County by the firm which has not beon paid and is tho only monftY from the 1975 Cuntnct which doeD not involve another contract entered into with Americ~lO. r~r. Uall pointed out that there is $58,000 1n caDh collected under Revenues as part of the 1975 Contract termination which Is the property of the County with Mr. Norman advising that tho only portion of the $50,000 which American can lay claim to is the 10' col- lection fee provided for in the Termination Agreement. Pursllant to a dIscussion on whether or not the $20,000 held from tho March payment undcr the 1980 Agreement would be sufficient, as was questioned by Commissionor Wimer when the matter was discussed, Mr. Hall said that it now appoars thðt there will be a difforence of $2,000 or $3,000 due to the fact that the collections were 108s than antici- pated. Mr. Norman also pointed out that, si~ce that time, thore have boen some significant changes - one being the fact that It wa' eKpectcd that Mra. Mðguire would continue to reconcile and wipe out some of the Category III items, as included in the Peat, Marwick, Hitchell , Co. .udlt, which still remain at issue, and, also, it was eKpocted that the County would receive $20,000 to $25,000 worth of equipment which has not be.n pr.sented. In response to Hr. Mike Zewalk's comment that the public is confus.d over the matter, Commissioner Wenzel Baid that, when the BOOK Oö1 PACE 737 rago 5'; l-----------~----~-~-----~-~----- ~ I ,--~---~-----~-~~----~----~---'---~ &OOX OBi PAtE 738 May 2&, 1991 Manager get. all of the fi9ure. together, they will be pre.ented to the Doard and to the public, adding that all of the fðcta and figure. are .till not sufficient to ~.ke . factual pre.ontation. Clerk Reagan pointed out that a lot of hard work i. being done by a lot of people but that one of the reasons that the .taff doe. not have all of the figures ia bocauae they have not been given the.. He .aid that there Is information which the County has not been able to obtain, by law, and the Commissionera could be given figurea which could change the next day. Mr. Reagan also commented on the $116,000 bill which haa been unexpectedly received, which must be pre-audited and which will take Dome time. adding the further comment that the Grand Jury has many of the records which he cannot obtain. Mr. Zowalk voiced h1s concorn over providing a "blank check- to the statf to purchaso duplicðtea of items which may be returned In the future with Chairman pistor replying that he Is confident nothing will be purchðsed that is not Immcdiðtely needed, adding that some of the itORS mentioned can be unod on the new vehiclos when they arrive. Mr. Norman said that hI! does not "iew the authorization given by the, Board as ð "blank check" obecrving that some flexibility Is needed because of the emergency nðturo of the operation. He emphasized that there are no secrots bocause evcry action the Board takes is in the, -sunshlno-, with "overy thing- ,audited ~nd reported on to the Board. Mr. Hall said that of the approximately 19 "number.- that it would take to put a report togethor, tho staff probably has good, hard information on 5 or 6 of them - the balance would be annotated with footnotes saying "It this hðppons- or "something else i8 being reviewed- and the like. Going back to the otatement by Comml..lonar PØ9 a 57 I :¡ ,¡ " I ! I I I ------~---,~--------------~----~- , . .'¡ f'" "',-, , ---.; :=1' . t ,____------------------J----J-----......----- .... May 26, 1991 Wimer that ho based a judgmental decision on staff assurances that a certain sum would be adequato, ~r. Hall saið that the In!or~atlon at that tI~e still "hol~s· but observed that other matterø,hav8 come to light, the largest one being tho $116,000 billing which 18 new. lie coøunonted that it 18 hi. opin ion that the staff 1s neerln9 tho .",ð on gott1ng all of tho numbers together 80 that a report cen b8 brought to the Board with good, meaningful figurcB. Mr. Rea(jlan obsorved that nono of tho plIGt decisions which tho Board has made are changcd in any way, however, there are new decisions which have to be made, and thnt, as Boon as possible, a recommendation will b. brought to tho Bo~rð. Chair~ðn pintar concluded the discussion with the comment that, hopefully, by the next meeting the entire matter will be "ironed out". REC!SSa 12102 P.M. until 1130 P.M. at which time Doputy Clerk Bronne~ðn was replaced by Deputy Clerk Davidson. NOTEI Commissioner Wimer was not present when the meeting vas reconvened. CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES FOR (18) SUMMER RECREATION SUPERVISORS - APPROVED FOR EXECUTION Commiosioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Comissloner Brown snd carried 4/0, with Commissioner Wimer absent, that the contracts for the following eighteon summor recreation supervisors be approved for execution by the Chairman, subject to tho availability of funds within the Parka and Recreation budget. Henry Norona Robert Jackson Carol Re imenn Ed r..llinger Jeo!lO Nðra ...1 ke Templeton Wendy Ha inos Romero Campins Cheryl DiCiacomo Beth Henry Bornðdett Campanone Tracoy Wentzel Juan At-lI\ero Kirtley Schu1thoIs Wa ynÐ Di G1ðcomo Judy Gte I.gerwald Edna Reyna Paul Coatos BOOK Oö1 PACE 739 PII98 58 --- -=- ---:-- - - -- - --: -:-- - - - -:-r:- - -;- - -- - - ~ - - - -:--- .-, ~ . .------- - -- -- - -- - -- -. - ~- - --- - -- -- - - -- - - .--- - -- BOOK 001 fACE 758 fotay 26, 1981 BID 1484 rOR TI1EODOLITE TR~NSIT (tNGINE£RINC DEP~RTMr.NT) . ~W~RDED TO ALLEN PRECISION EQUIPMENT CO. OF ^TL^NT~, G~. IN THE AMOUNT or $2,490 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May ~ And 7, 1981, as evidencod by ~ffidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received up to Wodnesday, May 20, 1981 for aid 1484 for a Theodolite Transit. Commissionor Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Xruse and carried 3/1, with Commlsoloner Wenzel opposod &nd Commissioner Wimer absent, that Bid 1484 for a Theodolite Transit for use by the . Engineering Department be awarded to Allen Precision Equi~Qent Co., Atlanta, Goorgla in the amount of $2,490, 8S recommended by purchasing Director Frank Wilcox and outlined within the Executive Summary dated Hay 22, 1981, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the rosulting ðgroement. DID 1482 LEASE WITIJ PURCHA~E OPTION AND INSTÃLLATION OF ~N INFORM~TION PROCESSINC SYSTf.M FOR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT - ~W~RDED TO IBM (MONTHL~ COST $2,1310) (TOT^L COST $130,8~O) Legal notice hftving beon published In the Naples Daily News on April 28 and 30, 1981, as evidenced by ~ffidðvit of publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received up to May 20, 19B1 re Bid 1482 for a lease with purchase option ~nd installation of an information processing system for tho Building Inspoction Department. . . . Commissioner Wimer entered the meeting at this ~1~4& 1&38 P.M. . . . purchasing Director Frank Wilcox exploined that, In addition to the quoted prices, thero were other aspects taken into consideration by Dr. Ruth Thomas, Word procosslng Consultant, Torry Virtð, Community Development Administrator, and Mr. Wayne Scamehorn, Building Director, who jointly reviowod all bids roceived. He reported that their joint ----------------------------~g~~-- . . , CJ ¡--¡ - ~....----: --' \ I ! ¡ \ j \ II II ! ; I . ; , -- - -'- - - '"'-- - - -- - -- _.-:. - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --" MI'lY 26, 1981 recommendation is to award the subject bid to IBM. Co~mlaøion8r Wimer movod, soconded by Commissloner Wenzel and carriod unanimously, that Bid 1482 for the leone purchase option and Instelletion of an in!ormðtlon procesßinq system for the Building Inspoction Department bo awðrded to IBM in the totnl ðmount of $130,860 at a ~onthly cost of $2,181, aB recommended within the Exocutive Summary dated 5/22/81, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and tho Clerk to attest tho rosulting Agreement. BID '483 FOR ST~ND ^LONE CONFIGUR~TtONS RE INFOnM^TION PROCES9INC FOR BUILOING INSPECTION DEP^RTMENT - AWARDED TO IBM ON ^N "OPEN-END" CONTRACT IN THE ^HOUNT OF $6,054 PER UNIT ANNUALLY OR $504 MONTHLY Logal notice having been publiDhcd in the Nnples Dally News on ~pril 28 and 30, 19B1, 08 eyidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, bids wore receivcd up to Mðy 20, 1981 re Bid 1483 for stand ^lone configurations re information procensing for the Building Inspection Department. purchasing Director Frank Wilcox explained the "open-end" contract which is pursuant to IMB'n submittal of Bid 1483 for the stand alono configurations that complement the information proc08sin9 systom for which IBM aubmitted Bid 1482. Ho also stated that the subject contract doe. not commit tho County to purchase said equipment, rather, the configuratlono will be available to tho County at the quoted prices on an _a. needed basis·. County Manager Norman concurred, adding that any purcha... under this contact would have to be authorized by the BCC. Hr. Wilcox said that it 1s the joint recommend~tion of Dr. Thomas, Word proco..ing Consultant, Torry v1rta, community Development Adminiatra- tor, and Wayne Scamohorn, Buildin9 Director that Bid '483 be awarded to IBM. Commiasioner Wimer moved, soconded b~commiD81on.r Wenzel and ~OOK Oö1 PACE {59 .---------------------------------.. \ ~ --,-'" . . ____________________~______~uw-- ~QQK OBi PACE 760 May 2~, 1981 carried unanimously, that Bid 1483 for stand alone information processing configurations be awarded to IBM in the annual amount of $6,054 per unit or ð ~onthly cost of $504, a. recommenðed within the Executive Summary dated 5/22/81, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the resulting agreement. COUNTY M1\N1\GER AUTHORIZED TO AT'1'tMPT SUBSTITUTION OF VEHICLES IN ORDER TO PROVIDE Er.S Drnr.CTOR A VEI1ICLE County Manager Norman explained that the Executive Summary dated 5/22/81 outlines a proposal for substitution of vohicles in order to provide a suitable vehicle for use by the EMS Director. Ho said that this proposal is no longer valid, DS the intended station wagon i8 too old and has too many miles on the odometer to make the tra,,:,fer. Ite said that he does, howover, have another source of a .uitable vehicle in mind and he requested authorization to completo the substitution if possible. He explained that in the event that such a substitution Is not posbiblo, then, the original purchase of a station wagon for the EMS Director, as approved by the DCC on 5/19/81, will be initiated. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzol and carried unanimously, that Mr. Norman's recommendation be accepted, that he be given authorization to attempt the aforcmentioned substitution of vehicles, and, in ~he event that the substitution is not possible, the 5/19/61 action stands. EXPENDITURE FOR FUNDS NOT TO EXCEED $5,000 FOR RESURF1\CING EVERGLADES CITY TENNIS COURTS AUTHORIZED, FISC1\L OFFICER TO PREP1\RE RELEVANT BUDGET AMENDMENT Parke and Recreation Diroctor Rollie Rice stated that he haa receivoda request from the Mayor ðnd the citizens of tver9lðdeo City to tund the resurfacing of that City's tennis courts. He explained P1I90 n ---------------------------------- . . - ] ~ ::=J X'. ___ 1..--._ - -"- - -- - -- - - -'- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - _.. May 26, 1981 that the deterioration ot the 8urCaco,ot the courts occur. about every five year. and that the County has contributed towards the resurfacing In tho pa.t. It was noted in the Exocutive Sumamry, datod 5/22/81 and prepared by Mr. Rico, that the tonnis courtÐ in Evorglad~s City servos the outlying areas ot Everglades City such ðS plantation, Chokoloskoe, Lee Cypre.s, and Ochopee and i8 also used 'for tonnis classos. A discussion followed regardlng tho methods of funding such a project, the sourCQS of lunds available for this project as well as those used for prior resurfacing, and, methods of allocating the costs of reourfacing, 1.e. sharing tho expense with Everglades City versus the County bearing the entirø financial burden and/or the ramifications of each. County Manager Norman explain(d thût the tennis courts can be considered as one of those facilities that bonefit tho entire County as decided during the recent "double taxation issuo", therefore, the resurfacing could be funded through tho Genoral Fund in tho Dame manner as the resurfacing of tho tonnis courts in other park8 within incor- porat.ed aroas, i.o. Naples High School. A discussion followed rognrding t.he probloms related to supplying services t.o incorporated areas at the conclusion of which Fiscal Officer Harold L. Hall stated that he would work with tho County Att.orney and the County Manager beforo preparing the relevant budget a~endment in an effort to reach an equitable decision a8 to tho source of funds"for the ,ftubject projoct. Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried unanimously, that the expenditure of funds not to oxcood $5,000 for the resurfacing of the tverglades City tennis courts bd ðuthorize~ .nd that the Fiscal Officer pr.pare the relevant budget amendment for presontation to the Board. " ~OOK 001 PACE 761 . 1! ... ...... - ...--. - -- --- -------------------- ~: .~ .' i ~ ! ¡ ! I ¡ . ~_______________-_._._-----------p.~,r.;¡r--'·' ¡ , t I ¡ ¡ I ¡ J &OOK OBi PACë 762 "'ay 26, 1981 POGITION OF ,.,ANAGER OF COMrUTER OPER^TIONS IN DATA PROCESSING APPROVED AT PAY GRADE 14, UPGRADING OF (7) POSITIONS' PAY GRADES AUTIIORI%ED, $19,500 AUTHORIZED POR Rt-At.LOCATION NITHIU S""'E DEP^RTfoIENT BUDGET Data proce.sing DIrector Bill Denty referrod to the proposal for the creation of the position of Manager of Computer Oporation. at a pey irad. 14 and the upgrading of ..ven other positions within the Date proce.sing Department outl·ined within the Executive Summary dated fl\ðy 20, 1981, as wall as a request for approval of the .um of $19,500 to be re-allocated from Roserve for Wage and Salary Adjustment to Salary and Fringe Benefits within that department's budget. The following are the recommended changes in the subject department's organizations positions Current Pay Grade Requested Pay Grade No Chang- No Chang- 23 2J 23 16 23 23 10 No chang' proposed 14 Director project Analyst (CJIS MGR.) project Anal yst project Anlllyst Tech. Support Analyst Programmer Analyst programmer· programmer* Computer Operator Secretary M9r. Computer Operations·· 27 27 18 18 18 12 9 9 7 * Recommended for upgrading to project ^nalyst at pay grade 23. ** Recommended for creation of position. " After a brIef discussion and upon Mr. Denty's statement that the Data processing Policy Committee has reco~endnd tho approval of the above-referenced changos in tho organizational structure of his department, Commissioner Wimer movod, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried 4/1, with Commissioner Kruse opposed, that the pos1ton of ¡. mðnager of computer operations be approvod at a pay gr~de 14, that the I. above-roferenced (7) positions be upgraded accordinglYI and, that the aum of $19,500 be approved for re-allocation withIn the Data procoss1ng budget. J ,.'T--~- - - --,~'-- - -- ----- -:--- _._______pag!-.tS1---- . , . . , . . . . . , i ,,..--, ¡--¡ ~ - --------------------------------.. May 26, 1981 810 PROCEUS W^IVED, r.XPENDITURE OF $10,000 FOR CONSTULT^NT SERVICES OF ENGINEER LEON MURH1\Y RE STUDY OF PO\'IER PRODLEMS RELATED TO DAT^ PROCESSING OPER1\TIONS - APPROVED Commissioner pistor asked Data procesoing Director aill Donty to relata the various problems associ~ted with tho electrical power supply to the Data Processing SYGtem and to make his rocommendations to the Board. Commissioner Wenzel asked Mr. Denty if thero was a consultant hired last year to study the electrical problems of the Data Procossing System and Mr. Denty said that Digital Equipment Co. has comploted a aurvoy which was subsoquently turned over to the Policy Co~mittee. Ho said that Dl~ltal'a survey identified tho problems related to the operations of D8ta Processing and offercd four alternate solutions, however, tho problems have not been rem"died. He said that he has contacted Fl~rida power & Light Company who gnve him tho namft of two Electrical Engineers who could handlo the problems. He said that one engineer expressed no intereot in tho project and the other, Mr. Leon Murray, has visited tho Complex and indicated that he considers there are several alternative solutions which might be undertaken, as out- lined in the letter submitted to the Data processing Policy Committee. Mr. Denty atated that it will require a qualified electrical engineer to mako a final determination as to what tho power related nceds ðre for Collier County. lie said that because he believos that there io a n.ed to remedy these power related problems as soon as possible and because of the time element involved in a formal bid process, he i. requesting that the bid procoss be waived. Mr. Denty outlined tho high costa involved in damage suffered from power surges to tho data processing equipment and tho subsequent high coat of repair and/or replacement such a8 the $40,000 1060 in revenuos and equipment damago resulting trom such a powor ðurge on July 4, and Auguøt 30, 1979. WOK Oöl fACE 763 . ....-....------ ---- --------------------- , . . .__----------~--------------~r~-- bOOK Oö1 PAGE 764: May 26, 1981 A discus.ion followed regarding the placement of the lightning rods on the root of the complex 1n relation to placement of antnnnae, the problema related to a flve-story building such aa Building ·f·, which is the highest building in the immediate area, and the relation- ship of bullding height to the attraction of lightningl the fact that the manufacturer of the equipment has identified the problema and that the solutions require the professional judgement of eloctrical .ngineers, aa explained by Clerk Reagan who reminded the Board that the problems are vary complox because the power source Bupplie. many ..parate buildings here at the government center, and the proposed contract costs with Mr. Murray as outlined by Mr. Denty. ~r. Canty explained that the $10,000 Is the minimum fee for which Mr. ~urray will agr.. to study the complex, decide on an appropriato solution, and writ. the specifications for what is requ~rod to solve the problem. Commissioner Kruse Asked for clarification regarding tho proposod fee and Mr. Centy explained that this is a consultant's foe. Commissioner pistor outllnQd some of tho alternative solutions to the subject power problems, including the installation of · "gen- erator/olternator system" which would run all of the time and would cost approximately $135,000 to install plus the cost of operation. Also, tho alternative of installing a second power line, which would have to b~ connected to a second source and could not be connocted to the source presently used by the Complex. In answer to Commissioner Kruse, Clerk Reagan said that other counties are experiencing many of the samo problems ðnd are installing various alternatives such as a conøtant 80urce of power and Mr. Denty concurred, adding that each county has its own unique problema. He outlined some problems unique to Collier County including tho presence of grounding grids which run through tho roof of Building "F· and havo power lines running diroctly ------------------------------.---- . . . :=J ¡--1 ,'-- --' I ¡ f j I I ¡ , , , ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ - - - - ---- - - ---vlr9i-1fS- -,' t'lay 2G, 1981 beneath them. He explained what will happon if R~ilding MF- were to experience a direct "hit- from lightning and Commisnioner Wenzol stated that an electrical engineer should be able to find a way to direct'that -hit" away from the buIlding. Also discuss~d was tho fact that b..idos problema relatod to surgos, the Data processing syatem a100 auffora from minor intorruptions in powor. lie said that thQse interruptions cause tho systom to suddenly "drop" and it takes 30 minutes to 1 hour to get all UBors "back on tho air- resulting in -totally unproductivo timo- spent by tho Data processing Department as well as tho various 'user 8. Mr. Denty said that h~ talked with Bill Scott, of the Department of Energy in Atlanta, Goorgia and that he recommended an -altornate source" which is callcd a -spot network-. Mr. Denty said that Mr. Scott informed him that the powcr company is obligðtcd to supply the County with this kind of service ~f it is dotermined as a requirement for proper oporation of the data processing systcm. In answer to Commissioner Wenzel, Me Denty said that Mr. Scott indicated that, in order to pursue this course of action, tho BCC would havo to iaBue a formal complaint to FP&L and thon, if satisfactory results are not forthcoming, the BCC would have to follow through with 'a complaint filed with the Public Service Commission. Mr. Donty said that all of the solutions mentioned during the discussion are viable alternativea, howevor, he believes that the Board needs the profensional guidance of a competent eloctrical engineer to guide them in these decisions and to recommend the best steps to take. He Baið that he do.s not fool that he has the qualifications to make these kinds ot a recommendations to the Board and recommended that the Board approve the consultant contract with Mr. Murrray. After a brief discussion r09~~)p9 t~6~8tory of tho subject aOOK UDJ. PACE'{ ,t) ---:--- --:------,--.-------:--¡--------- --- -.-- ~ ------.---------'------ ----ncë"--- &OO~' Oöl PACE 766 May 26, 1981 department and those ~atter. rolated to financing the anticipateð kind. ot solution. requirod to regulate the electric power, Commiosioner Wen~el moved to transmit a letter of complaint to' FP&L as recommended by Mr. scott and, if there is no satisfaction, th~ Board will issuo a complaint to the PSC. The motion died for lack ot a second. The discu~sion continued rogarding the adequacy of the po~er supply into the Complex, during which Mr. Centy stated that he considers it "less than adequato· becausc the system has ·gona down- three times in tho last week due to power fluctuations. Also discussed further was tho proposed consultant'. fee of $10,000 which repr.sent. approximately 10\ of what is anticipated as the probable cost of the installation ot a "UPS. (Uninterruptable power Source). Mr. conty said that a .UPS" consistD ot batteries and he added that this alternative mAY not be "cost justified". Mr. Norman said that he believes that if tho costs would be very high for the power company to run an oxtra service lino into the Complex and, if the Board is anticipating forcing the power company to install suc~ a system, it would be prudent for tho County to have "expert information" available to "back up" such a request as well AS to present to the PSC. Mr. Ccnty concurred, adding th~t whichever alternative the Board decides to initi~te, they will need an "expert opinion" for justification. Commissioner wenzel ßoid that he soes no alternative but to øpprove thu proposed contract~ ospecially sinco Mr. Centy has not been able to got ~nyonc else interested in doing the work and because of tho ~pparent criticøl situation regarding the powor problems affecting tho D~tø processing System. Commissioner pistor said that ho has read all the minuten of the Policy Committee and he knows that the question a. to how to solve the electric power problems has been going on for oyor a year and requires the immediðtQ attention of the board. He 8aid that . - --- - - - - -..- ---: - - - - --- - - - - ---- --,....---- "--1 - r--~ -1 ________.__ __._______________-mer:;-r---' May 26, 1981 he feels that it has bun delayod long enough. Clerk Reagan u,id, that. the high cost involved in 8olvin9 the problem has dQterred action in the past and Mr. Denty said that the longer the County wait. the ~or. it i. going to cost in repairs, equipment, and tho 10.. of valuable e~ployee productivity time. Commissioner Wenzel moved, .econded by Com~i.810ner Wimor and carried 4/1, with Co~mi8sionor Kruso opposed, that the bid process bo waived and that the contract for Engineering Consultant Services of Leon Murray in the amount of $10,000 bo authorized, as recommended by Data Processing Director Bill Denty. 800lt Oô1 fAte 767 ---------------_._----------_!~~~-~!._. .:. .; ~ ,. . ___- ___ - -...__ ____ ---.-II --------------------.. --- &OOK 061 PACE 768 May 2&, 1981 RESOLUTION 81-147 LE~SING COUNTY PROPERTY KNOWN ~S C"^" PROPERTY TO-THE COLLIER MODEL ~ERON~UTIC9 CLUB, INC. - hDOPTED. LE~SE ~PPROVED FOR EXECUTION Upon hearing that tho proposed leaeo with the Collier ~odol ~.ronautlc. Club, Inc., for County proporty known aa the Cran property, includes the usuðl provisions for liability Insurance covera~e, troN I I I I I i \ I ¡ . County ~ttorney Pickworth who added that the adoption of a Resolution declaring the subject property not needed for County purpose. i. In order, Commissioner Wimer ~oved, seconded by Co~m18.ion.r Brown and carr1ed unanimously, that Resolution 81-147 declaring the Gran property not needed for County usa and authoriz1ng the leae1ng of same property to the Collier Modol Aeronautics Club, Inc. be adopted and that the lease bo approved for execution. ,. _--------------------------~n9~~-- I . , ' , . C3 '. r:-"'~~'1 r:::J ' -------------------------------- May 26, 1901 P"RT-TIME SECRETARI"L POSITION FOR COUNTY ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED County ^ttorney Donald Pickworth explainod that one secretary, cannot handle all the work entailed in a three-attorney offico, there- fore, he is requcsting authorization to hire a part-time .ecretary to co~plement his staff. lie sa lC1 that he is proposing to hiro ð l/2-time person at the minimum wago for this job, adding that ho has contacteCl 8omeone who can work for Boven weeks this Bummer. He Bald that th\a will give him the opportunity to BOO how a pnrt-time secretarial posi- tion will work out in his office before making any permanent decisions. Com~ißsionor Wimer moved, soconded by Commissioner Brown anCl cArried unanimously, that tho pooition of a part-timó secretary be approved for t~e County Attornoy's Office, and that Mr. pickworth be authorized to fill the position. WARRANTY DEED Rt PETITION TDR-8l-2C, COLLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPOR^TION - "CCEPTED, SUBJECT TO CERT^IN LANGUAGF: CIIANGES RECOMMENDED BY COUNTY "TTORNEY REGARDING PnollIßITION OF UGE OF SUßJECT PROPERTY FOR SECURING OIL/MINERAL RIGHTS RETAINED BY COLLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RESOLUTION Al-I~8 RE DOARD ^CCEPT^NCE OF SA~'E WARRANTY DEED - ADOPTED . I , County "ttorney Pickworth roported that Collier Development Corporation has delivered the Warranty Deod for the property regarding Petition TDR-8l-2C, and that he i8 recommending the acceptance of said De.CI, subject to certain languago changcs regarding tho prohibition of the u.e of the subjoct lend by Colllor Corp. to secure any 011 or .1netals subsequent to tho Collier Corp. IS retentlon of the oil/mlneral rights. In answer to Commissioner Kruse, Mr. Pickworth said that this retention of oil/mineral rights is commonplace In real estate trans- actlona, however, without tho spocific language changes he Is rocom- mending, the party holding those rights could use tho property to get to tho oil or ~in8ral8. Ho sald that he Is recommenCling that the Corporation b. specifically prohibited from doing 80 and that, if they ~OOK 061 ¡fACt Tm -_...._-_._-----,,---------_._--_.__....-._._...._......~...-.. ...~..... ....,.., ....-. - -. \ ~ .~---~-~--~--~--~~--~~~~--~- nqr7T1-- ~o~ 001 PA~ 780 May 26, 1981 wl.h to .ecure any oil or minerals, they would have to -slant drill- trom adjac.nt property. AIBO discu..ed briefly was the reason for the County'. acc~ptanc. of the land, same being the pre.ervation of that land. Mr. pickworth ro.ponded to CommloBloner ~ruse'. query stating that, to his knowledge, this is the first time that a petitioner has requested to retain the oil/mineral rights for property re the TDR process, however, he soes no roason not to approve the retontion of .uch rights, aa long as the aforementioned stipulations are Included In the relevant docUmontatlon. Comminsloner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner wimer, that the warranty Deed from Collier Development Corporation ro Petition TDR-8l-2C be acceptod, subject to the aforementioned languag8 changes as outlined by Mr pickworth. planner ,Lee Layne said that the Planning Department has a standard resolution rogarding the acceptance of the subject Deed that will require adoption as well, and both tho motioner and the soconder Agreed to include the adoption of Resolution 81-148 in the motion. The motion carried ,unanimously. " ¡ j ¡ , ¡ .~- - ---...,.. - -- - r;- - - - ____- - ---- - --P..!....'!!.._- , \ I \ . , . , r=J ~." . ~ r: - · . . , ------- '--- --------- ---------------- '.. ~o~ OUl fAŒ 785 MAy 215, 1981 COUNTY ATTORNEY l\UT\tOnIZED TO HIRE ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY County l\ttorney pickworth 8t~ted that Assistant County AttorneY Anthony pires i8 leaving his position and he roquestod authorization to hire another attorney to fill that vacancy. The rate ot pay for the replacement attorney was discussed briefly, during which Mr. pickworth said that he would probably have to hiro tho now attorney at the sa.. rate of pay 4S is currently being given Mr. piras, or perhaps a8 much as $3,000 more annually, in order to hire someone who is qualif1ed to take over the rooponsibilities of that poal tion. County Manger Norman sald that the current personnel policy allows for h1r ing new personnel, at up to 10' more than the current rate and Mr. pickworth said, that this may not be Buff ic ient 1n order to get an attorney to move into the area and take the position. After a discussion of the kind of exporience that he is looking for in the applicants for the posit10n, the responsibilities of that position, and the føct that there has to be an incontive for anyone tðking the position to rolocate in Collier county, Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that the County Attorney be authorized to negotiate the salary and hire an Assistant County Attorney. ROUTINE BILLS - APpnOVED FOR PAYMENT Commisßioner Wenzol moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unÐnimously, that tho routino billo, having been processed following eotablishcd proceduro with funds available, be approved for pðyment 4S evidenced by the following checks issued from May 20, 1901, through Mðy 26, 19811 ACCOUNT BCC PAYROLL (D.P.WRITER) COUNTY CHECKS MYROLL FUND cnECK NUMBERS 23617 - 24144 ,8512 8715 1 pag_ 12 ,...------.-----;~------------------~--' , . c=J c:::J c=J' .. \ I . L___________________---~---~-----~ Ma y 2 6 , 1 9 81 BUDGET hMENDMENT NO. 01-105 APPROPRI^TINO CONTRIBUTIONS ^S ^ßSIST^NCE IN fURCnASINO AAILROAD RIr.lIT-OF-W^'l (5th , Gth CENT G.l.S T.l.X FUND) - ~DOfTED IN TltE .I.",OUNT OF $340,000 Com~lssioner Wimer moved, socondod by Commissionor Brown and carr led unanimously, that nUdget Amend~.nt No. 81-105, appropriating contrlbutions aa assiatðnce in purchasing the railroad right-of-way fro~ pine Ridge Road to Immokalee Road from Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company and to transfer funds from Reservo for Future Expenditures to Land, bo adopted in tho amount of $340,000. \, 6D:)K Oô1 I'm 787 \ , ' fag 0 73 I----:---~------:-----~--.------------- ! 1 ~ , I . .; , \. '" , . I ~-------------------------------~ May 26, 1981 BUDO£T AMENDMENT NO. 81-106 TR1IN'SFERRING FUI~DS TO PROVIDE Fon NEW 8ECRE1'ARIAL POSITION WITHIN BCC BUDGET - ADOPTED IN TilE ^MOUNT OF !~,080 --- Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commlsalonor'arown and carried unanimously, that Budget ~enðment No. 81-106, transferring funds to provide tor now secretarial poøition within the BCe Budget, be aðopted in the amount of $5,080. õßIìt)j( Ofil acE 789 Page 7( ~-:---......---------- - - ---:-------------=----- . " v , , . , ~ '\ .. " { .~ , . _____...1.-------------=------------------- May 26, 1981 BUDGET ~!NDMENT NO. 81-107 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR COST OF COLORIMETER WJTHIN ^GRICULTURE BUDOF.T - 1\DOrTED IN THP: AMOUUT or $975 Commi.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commis8ioner Wenzol and carried unanimously, thðt Budget A.n\endlllent No. 81,-107, uanaferr1n9 funds to provide for the cost of a Colorimetor within tho ^griculture Departmont's Budget, bo adopted in the amount of $875. , J ,>f, tutlK Ot;í aCE 791' --------~---_..._--_............- .-... Page 75 ... ............ ...-....~.-.._._---_..... ,; ~ - -,~- I . ; ------------------------------------- ""ay 26, 1981 BUDCET AMENDMENT NO. 81-108 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR CONTINUED PRE-EMPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES WITHIN PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT BUDCET - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,500 Co~mi.øloner Wimer moved, seconded by CommIssioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendmont No. 81-10B, transforrIng funds to provIde for continued pre-employment actIvIties wIthIn the Personnel DepDrtment Budget, bo adopted In tho amount of $4,500. BOOK 001 PACE 793 . . Page 76 ____ ___ ___ _______ - _,_ ______ ___ --..t______ -.- --. . , -----------~--------------------' May 26, 1981 RESOLUTION NO 81-149 COMMENDING ~CTING AGRICULTURAL DIRECTOR p^UL JI~MM AND nECOMI'1ENDING TII~T Ur. ElF. ~PPOINTr.D AS DIRECTOR - ADOPTED A!tor a discussion regarding the apparent unwillin9nesa of the University of Florida to appo1nt Acting D1rector paul Hamm as the 'Director of ^grlculturo for Collier County, the var10us reasons that they have given for this lack of affirmative action, the fact that the farmers 1n Immokaleo support Mr. Hamm wholeheartedly, and the consensus 0' the Board that they would like to aee Mr. Hamm get tho appointment, Commissionor Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that Resolution No. 81-149 commending Mr. Hamm for the fine 'ob he has don~ and urging the Unlveroity to appoint him as Director of Agriculture be adopted. NOTE. Document not received by the Clerk's Office. RESOLUTION NO. 81-150 RE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' POLICY ON PAYMENT OF ROUTINE BILLS - ADOPTED I. Fiscal officer Harold Hall outlined a propooed rosolution which authorizes the Clerk's Office to pay routine bills in an orderly and timely fashion upon each bill meeting cortain roquirements for payment. He explained that this process will negate tho need to have routine bills come before the ace for approvol each week and will also allow the Clerk's Office to process the routine billa in such a manner a8 to avoid high work peak poriods each week. Mr. Hall explained that the Clerk'. Office will make regular reports of ðll bills paid 1n this ..nner on woekly basis and that thiø report will becomo part of the Minute. of oach Regular Bee meeting. Mr. Hall outlinod the following ,requirementa for payment. 1. The expenditure was properly authorized. ~tJtw. OBi ~tt ~ pag8 77 . . -- -.-- -- - -- .-- -- - -- - - - - - - -....- - - - - - - - - - - - ---: - --- - , _.- -- ---, '.., - ---------------------- i!ø 001 mE 196 May 26, 1981 2. The goods ot .etvl~e. were received satisfactorily. 3. An invoice or teque.t for payment was recoived and determined to be correct. . Upon hearing County ~ttornoy pickworth state that he has .tu6ieð the proposed resolution and that he concurs with the content. thereof, , ' Commi.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that R..olutlon No. 81-150, regarding tho Board'. polley on the payment of routine bll1s, be adopted. .. page 78 T-------~-------~-~-~----~--~---- . '.' ' ", , . 'CJ r\:.?~1 r:::::J' . I . . I --------------------~---------~--l ~y 26, 1981 ;6t~ 0B1 ¡rAtE 798 . . . . Commissionor ~ru.o left the room at this time, 2123 P.M. . . . Dß. WILLIAM COX APPOINTED AS PROVIDER REPRESENTATIVE ON HEALTH SYSTEMS COUNCIL Commi..ionor pistor explained the need to choo.e a provider represcntative to serve on the Health system~ Council in order to fill the vacancy due to Mr. M~guiro no longor being a member. He Baid that he has received rosumes from the following interested personsl Dr. Wil~iam Cox, Dr. William Bailey, and, Robert Sandburg, tho Executive Diroctor of Able Care. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Kruse out of the room, that Dr. William Cox be appointed to serve as the Provider Ropresentative on tho Health 8YII tems Co unc i1 . Commissioner Wimer requested that letters of appreciation be sent to Dr. Bailey and Mr. Sandburg thanking them for their interest. BCC VACATION EXTENDED TO JULY 14, 1981 Commisaioner Brown moved that the BCC vacation period be extended to July 14, 19B1. Commissioner Wimer seconded the motion which carried 4/0, with Commissioner Krußo out of the room. CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS - AUTHORIZED FOR TilE CH^IRM^N'S EXECUTION Commissioner Wenzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0, wtih Commlso1oner ~ruse out of the room, that tho pag e 79 T----~-----~-~------------------~l ¡¡ . : i 1 r-"-_._~'" , ~,"".' ~ ~ -.-..,;,¡ ----- I \ \ I ¡ j \ --------------------------------. May 26, 1981 following Certlflcatos of Correction to the 1980 Tax Rolls, havlng boon pre.ented by the property Apprðlaer'8 Offico, be authorlzod for the Chalr~an'8 execution. 1980 TAX ROLLS TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY NUMBERS ~ Hðy 18, 1981 1980 - 125 , 126 . 2129 P.M. . . * Commlssloner Kruseentored the room at thls timec * * EXTRA G"'IN TIME FOR INPf....TE f^ 3<1056 - AUTHORIZED Commlssloner Wenzol movcd, soconded by Commlssioner Wimer and carrled unanimously, that 25 days extra gain time bo approvod for Inmate No. fA 34056, as recommended by Shorlff Aubrey Rogers. LEASE AGREEMENT RE MARCO ISLAND FIRE DISTRICT FOR EMS SP....CE, RETRO- ....CTIVE TO ....PRIL 6, 1981 - ^UT"ORIZ~O FOR CHAXRHAN'S ~IGNATURe ....dministrative Aide Grace Spaulding reported thðt she has received a request from the ~rco Island Fire Department for a Board decision regarding the execution of the le..e for .~ace at the fire station for u.. by the County EMS. She said that the proposed lease ls for $125.00 per month plus utllities, retroactive to April 6, 1981. There was a brief discussion rcgardin9 the cost of space at the , various EMS stations, during whlch Hr. Itafner, Public Safoty Ad~ln18trator, reported the followlng rent expansesl i. Colden Cðto Fire Department - $100.00 per month 2. Headquarters- $550.00 por'month Page 80 i6ÓOK W IVA"nE 100 ---..."..---------------:-------------:....--- ' ~ , = -~,~..",'- ~ ,_~___-------- .a..-_.-..:-----....:...-----:..--'---"--- ~Q~'i. 061 Flott: 800 May 26, 1981 3. Marco IBland rlre Department - $125.00 per ~onth 4. Immoka1ee rlre Statlon - $150.00 per month 5. North Naples - $300.00 per month Commle.loner Wl~er moved, seconded by Comml..loner Brown anð carried unanimously, that the lease for EMS apace at the Marco Islanð I Flre Department be authorized for the Chairman'. slgnatura, a. outlined ! earlier by Ma. spaulding. I t . I , I ! I I I I .. , ,~ >/., '" pag e 81 ~-----~----~--------------------- . ' . . , ¡.,;¡: H ',,' . . ~.>'.. ~ ~. ~ --- -------------------------------- ., Hay 26, 1981 BCC FISC^L POLICY TO INCLUDE F.GTABLISlIMENT OF POLICY RC CONTR^CTU^L SERVICES, B01\RD ADOPTED rOLICY ST1\TEfo\F:NT M; RECOMMENDED BY TilE CLERK. FORM (SCIIEDULE 9) RE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR CONTRACTU^L SERVICES TO BE ^DDr.O TO 1981-82 BUDGET I-IORK£IIF.ET FOR DF.PARTM£NT IIEAD'S cot-1rLETION' Co~i.aioner Kruso stated that sho would like the Board to consider the Implementation of contr~ctual sorvice. within the Data Proco..lng Department rather than maintaining the numbers of personnel presently requlrod as approved this morning. Chairman pistor said thai, because all of the Constitutional Officors require work completed at various timos, tho Data Processing personnel must be available at -I all time to do that work. In answer to CommissIoner Kruse, Fiscal Officer narold Hall explained that it would be possible for the County to descrlbo the overall system that Is wanted, and then, contract it outl Commissioner r.ruøe said that in that manner the County oporators could· then run thø program. Mr. Hall concur rod, adding that there would also be a need for one computer programmer for maintenance. CommissIoner Kruse said that sho would like this to be considered, especially in lig~t of the large sum of money that must be allocated for salarIes In the subject 'j dep~rtment. Hr. Hall roferred to tho Executive Summary submitted by County Manager Norman dated May 2~, 1981, and stated that this report addresses most of these points and identifics somo areas that have already been the subject of the initiation of. contractual services. In response to CommissIoner Wimer, Mr. lIall recommended that a form (Schedule 9) be attached to the budget worksheet for FY 1981-82, for completion by Dopart~ant heads, regarding actIvities ,that may be performed by commercial firms on a contractual basis. ^t Commis- .toner Wimer's request, Mr. nall ðistributod copies of a lIIemorandum, WQ1; 061 fAt£ 803 Page 82 --~--------------~-----------------~~ ~ , . . . ___-----------l-----------~----- May 26, 1981 ~OK 061 PA~E 804 dated Hay 23, 1981 which included a copy of the subject form, to the Coœmis.ionerø and he Baid that, if the.e forma are properly completed by the department heads, .11 the information that Commissioner ~rUBe ia referring to will be forthcoming. Mr. Hall recommended that the Board reinstate the'followl~ atatement in the Fiscal Policy. -The Board dosires to utilize the services of commercial firms to the extent practicablo in the obtaining of services for governmontal units and in 8upplyln~ governmental services to the people of Collier Couney. Further, tho Doard does not desire to increase the size of county government, therefore, the heads of budgetary units which are budgeted all or in part by the Board of County Commissioners, each year prior to submission of budget requosts, are to evaluate each activity for which they orc responsiblo and report to the Board of County Commissionors the result of their evaluation and comments regarding the use of outside purchasod oorvices.- Mr. Hall sald that there ore many advantages as well .a disadvantagos to the use of outside contractual services, as outlined vithin Mr. Norman's EXÐcutive Su.,mary. 1\lso, Mr. Itall stated that -government by contract- 1s a g~od concept and allowS the government to spotlight some high cost areas. However, sa id Mr. lIall, it will not êwork unloss the County staff is comprised with knowledgoable people with the expertise to, monitor and administer the contracts. He Baid that total staff and costs could be reduced, however, they would have to bo replaced with highly kno~ledgeable "hlgh coat- koy personnel for administrðtlon. Commissioner Kruso sold that sho belioves thst the department heads are satisfactorily knowledgeable to know his/her own buslno.s, and Clerk Rcagan said that the County has encountered problema In this area in the past. He said that there ~ust be someone on ataff that has the oxpertise required to tell the contrActor eXActly what it Is tho County wants. Chairman pistor concurred, adding that . Page 83 --------------------------------- I . , ", . ' , . '~ c=J ¡--1 :.--J ----------------------- ""'y 26, 1981 there n.eds to be a Clo4r definition ,of what i. oxpected and exactly what the County wants and/or need. to be furnished by the outside contraccor. Also, the contractor ~ust be fully cognizant ot tho functions of the department which he will .erve,including a thorough familiarization with available oquipmont. He said that problema have occured in the past with rogards to tho Dala processing Department, wherein a contractor did not have tho knowlodge of specific equipment and would hðvo to hiro those experts. The number ot timea that tho programs in Data processing have boen changod was discussed, during which Mr. lIall explained that the County has dosigned sevoral Dub-syatcms and the process of upgrading those sub-syst~ms and tying them togother is an ongoing procoss. He said that this has been the -least cost- approach for immediate results, howover, the County comes to a point in time where a lot of ravisions are necessary and it is that time when the County must decide if the work should be done "in house" or contracted out. In answer to Commissioner Kruse, Mr. Hall ßaid that ho is not speaking of the -standard de-bugging" of the program, he is talking about major revisions and oxpansions of programs. He said that the financial systems are presently facing this kind of sit~atlon, addln9 that there will be ð financial systemå evaluation undertaken over the next three to four ~onths in order to determine if there is a need for outside purchased contractual services in this area. CO~~isDioner ~ruso asked if, in order for this concept to work, it will require department headD to be sincero in their ~otivation towards involvement in tho initiation of tho contractual service 'concept? Mr. nall replied affirmatively. Commissionor Wimer said that he believoD that the Board can bcco~. familiar with the neods of the various areas ~O:)1. 061 :!-oÄt! 8C6 Pa9. 84 ---~--------,-------:-------------- -. ~ . _. __...:----..:.... _ _ _ _ _ ~_ _.s...:....- -- -;..:..- -.:. - --'-- -"--- May 26, 1981 f¡ti:>K 061 n~ BOO where this concept may be applied, ðS well aa the degree to which each department head will be involveð, by studying the results on the completed forma recommended by Mr Hall. CO~ission.r Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse end carried unanimously, that the Board of County Commissioner's r~.cal Policy be amended to include the above-referenced paragraph recommended by the Clerk'. Office and that the form entitled Schedule 9 - LIST OF ACTIVITIES WHICH COULD BE PERFonMED UNDER CONTRACT WITH COMMERCI~L t i I ! ~ FIRM, be added to the 1981-82 budget worksheet for completion and submittal by all Deportment heads. Contractual County parDonnel, such as the County Manager, County Attorney and the County UtilitIes Manager'. poaltion was discussed briefly, during which Commissioner Wenzel stated that he would prefer to havo all of the ~eople In these positions working directly for the BCC, rather than on a contractual basis such as they are presentlY employed. He said that he undelstands that these positions are presently under contract, howover, he wIll not say that he will vote for the renowal of these contractS. lie s~id that he would prefer to' discusS this further durin9 tho July meeting when the Environmental Consultant's position is scheduled on the ~genda. It was the consensU8 of the members of the Board that the matter be deferred until that' time. . * * RECESS - TIMEt 2t39 P.M. - 2145 P.M. Commissioners Wenzol ðnd Brown were not present when the meeting reconveneð. . * . Page 05 ------------,-:----.------------------- .' , . ':=J c:::} c:J -----------------"----------------- May 26, 1981 REVISED CRITIC~L D^TC SCHEDULE RE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER EXP~NSION 1\PPROVED, SUBJECT TO TilE CONDITION TI1~T TIME BE REDUCED WHENEVER POUSIBLE, SPECIAL SERVICES BY POLIZZI/HEERY - APPROVED ^S RECOMMENDED BY GT^FF county Manðger Norman presented an overview of whero the Consultant team of Polizzi/Heery is today regarding the formulation of plans for the proposed new jal1 facl1ity.'tho apace study for the governmont complex, and tho resulting changes in scheduling, as outlined within the Executive Summary datod 5/22/01. lie alBO outlined the staff recommendatIon to spprove the proposed revised Critical Date Schedule and the request for authorization of the additional work by the construction program man4gers in directing and staffing said work under tho terms of the special ~ervlces portion of their contract, as outlined in the memorandum from Polizzl/11eery dated May 20, 1961, which identifies the additional costs as well DB doscribes the proposed revised critical date Ðchedule. After a brief discussion, during which Commissioner Kruse urged that the tlmeframes be moved up wherever possible in an effort to save ~on.y, Commissionor Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, with Commissioners Brown and Wenzel absent, that the Revised Critical Date Schedule for the County Governm~nt Center Expansion b. approved, subject to the time being reduced wherever possiblo, and thðt the Spechl Services by polizzi/lleory be ðpproved as recommended by the County MAnager. CONSULT^NT fIRM POLIZZI/BEERY INSTRUCTED TO PL^N FOR 416 BEDS IN PROPOSED J~IL FACILITY Mr. Daryl. Balles, Consultant with poli:nl/lIoory, ro!erred to pago two of the Executive Summary dated 5/26/81, entitled ~UMM~RY ~t)f; 061 WE 807 pag _ B 6 .-....... - .....- .....-_..-..._".~.._...-..__............ ...~..,'_...-.__..._...~..-.....__.- -... ..... .. , ¡ ¡ I I I i ¡ , \ í , --------------------------------- ~t~ Oíii :vm8Q8 . May 26, 1981 COMP^RATIVE ^N^LYSIS ALTERN~TE JAIL CONSTRUCTION CT^ND~RDS Collier Collier Government Complex~ and explained the reGulta of each of the five col~ns of fiqures thereof. Each prograM division wa. explained and sub.equent ce~~ent. were tertheo_ing tro~ the Board. Mr. Oailea EXPLAINED the diffenceø between the A.C.A. Minimum standards, the State of Florida Minimum requirements and the State of Florida Minimua Requlre~entø (all øingle cell). He oxpounded on the tabulations for square footage requirements for each of tho six program divisions and he concluded each of these ,explanations with the sum total of square feet finally arrived at by his firm referred to in the summary.. Revised Preliminary R~port of Findings ·E~hibit ~.. Mr. Balles requested that the Board give him some final direction a. to which they wished to adopt - Exhibit -A", Revised preliminary Report Of Findingsl Exhibit "0", AC^ Minimum Requiremcntsl or, Exhibit .C., Stnte of Florida Hlnlmum Requirements for the proposed nev jail facility. He also requested that the Board make a final determination as to how many beds they wished the new jail to have. . -II · Commissioner Wlmer'left the meeting during the discussion -2155 P.M. Commissionor Drown entcred tho meeting in progrcss at 3110 P.M. . . . After a general discussion as to the various alternatives, Sheriff Aubrey Rogers was asked what he felt is an accurate reflection of tho number of bods that will be needed over tho ten years proposed to ,be covered in the plans for a new jail. Sheriff Rogers said that he tend. to agree with the projection by Polizzl/Hoery that 416 beds vill be needod in ten years. Ho clarified that this figure mayor may not be adequate because no one knows at th1s time which direction the court. v111 take regarding tho incarceration of convicted persona. However, Page 87 ---------~------~------~~-------- , . J ----' í----l ::::J " ---------------,-----------------" , 4}. Ma y 2 t} , 1 981 to the best of his ability, this ae.m. to be an accurate and re.aonablo figure. He further said that ho would prefer to 800 aingle bod celle, rather than multiple bod cell., aa this would allow for bettor socurity and control in the jail. Shoriff RogerS also commented that an expanded modical/dental and pharmacy area is needed for physical exaDinations, storage ðnd control of drugs, and dontal facilities because the jail purchases its own drugs, and must have a safe place in which to store them that con Also offor good contr~l and security lIeasures. Also, priøoners cannot always be taken to the Itealth Department all tho time bocauso they are admitted all during the day and night and the Health Department ia only open during tho day from Monday to Fr1dllY. lie exphined the need to mod icate pr honers everyday, tho need to givo physical examinations in-housø to incoming prisoners, etc. and how all of this relates to the noed for such a room. Mr. McNeel statod thAt the rovisod proposal by polizzi/Heery has eliminated tho indoor recreation room with gymnasium facilitios that brought forth so much controverGY during on earlier presentation, and that subsequently there has beon a reduction of over 4,000 sq. ft. at a substantial sDvings of dollars. He said that an outdoor utilitarian area is being proposed instead, which will serve several purposes, including an outdoor recreation/exercise area as well as a placo where securlty~ould bo maintained and prisonors could be temporarily kopt in the event that the jail building would have to be evacuated for any re.son. There will also be a multl~purpo8e room, centrally located and offerlng the Ðbility to houso additionð1 prisoners, if needed, aD well as recre.tional activities, i.o. card playing, watching telovision, etc. ^lso explained by Mr. McNeel was the proposal for a contact ~t~ Ofji .~Att 809 Page 88 -----:---------.-------:-- - ------ ---.- -- -- . ·...... ...----.'. ,.".- -" ,--- -- '.'-" --,-..,.--.. ..' ,------,..---..- -.- tCOI'. OB1 t~¡;[ 810 May 215, 1901 vialtin9 roo~, which would allow for visitation of fa~ilies, and atill allow for security. Also discus.ed was the proposal for a commissary for the new jail, during which Sheriff RogerS stated that the jail la allowed to aell many items such as cigerettes and candy, etc. and that .the profit . earned (15') 18 applied towards the purchas. of tolevisions, magazine., .tc. This commissary will allow for a .afe storage for ouch articles and provido a form of control and provide for the purcha.. of ~any articles for use of the prisoners, including exorcise equipment. rollowing a general discussion, Mr. Bailes asked the Board for a decision ao to how many bods that his firms should plan for over the next ten years for the proposed new jail, explaining that the ad hoc committee for space study will bu meeting soon and, oleo, ho will need oomething In writing to present to the State authorities in order to seok their approval of the proposed plans for tho jail. Mr. Bailes explained that the State has tho last word on the approval of anything that the Boord may approve, and that although the County may meet what they beliove to be State requiremonts, the State reserves tho ri9ht to 9ive final approval. COunty Manager Norman explained that tho proposals by Polizzi/- Heory Are based on a 90' utilization factor in any given peak day. Sheriff Rogers said that he would be happy to go along with th- recommendations outlined in -Exhibit A-, and reminded the Doard that Seminole County has just completed a jail that they thought would be adequate when It was planned and have found that lt ia too oma11 now that they have moved into it. He cautioned against planning too 8mall and said that he bolievoS the projoction of 416 beds is falr. Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and pago 89 ---------~------.-----.------------ , , .' , . ,..---", ..ø-J c:::J ::::J · ' ------------. ----........---------- ------'. May 26, 1981 ~arri.d 3/0, with Commissionore Wimer and Wonzel absent, that the con.ultants plan ~16 beds for the proposod now jail over the ney.t ten year.. REVISED PRELIMINARY REPORT OF FINDINGS RE SPACE NEED ANALYSIS (JAIL '^CILITY) (EX\1IBIT "A") _ ADOPTED. POLIZZI/IIEERY AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH PROJECT , Aftor the above-referonced discussion, and upon complotlon of 4 brief explanation of the differences in costa of dovelopment of tho alternate plans outlined earlier by Mr. Bailes, Commissioner Brown moved, Goconded by commissioner Kruse and carried 3/0, with Commissioners Wlmer and Wenzel absent, that the RevlGed preliminary Report of Findings re space noed analys:e of the proposed jail facil1ties known as Exhibit -A- be adopted and that polizzi/Beery be authorized to proceed with the project. ': Commissioner Kruse asked the consultants to be sure and explain to anyone who might ask why the single bed coIls were chosen, including tho.. referred to earller by Sheriff Rogers, i.e. safety of priooners, security, hoalth and welfare of prisoners, control, scgregation of prisoners according to the seriousne.. of their crlmes, backgrounds, etc. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following ~C~( 061 r~8U: Pa98 90 .. e' _. .. ..-.---.-.---..'-'. --_..~_.~."...- -...----------. ~ ,----------------------------- --- 8C~ 081 ;f,AtE 8j,.2, Hay 2fi, '1981 corr.spondenco be filed and/or reforrod to the various departments .s Indicated. 1. Letter d,nted May 12, 1901, from Clydesdale Bank Limited, London, England, re Sir Robert Mc^lpine ,. Sons (Trado Invcøtmentø) ~irnited Guaranteo, requesting releaae of guaranteo postod January 8th 1960. xc Fi~cal Officer, T. Kuck, Engineer, Filed. 2. Petition dated May 18, 1981 with 13 signatures from residents on Goldcoast Court requesting relief from various problems regarding tho installation and construction of the sewer lIne to tho subject stroet. xc Utllltios Manager, Filed. 3. Copy of letter dated May 7, 1981 from Florida Dcpart~ent of ^griculture & Consumer Sorvices, to Community Development Administrator from Chris Andoraon, Collier County Forester, recapping tho April Forestry Division Report. Filed. 4. Memorandum from Mary G. Prasch, Assistant Court Administra- tor, tran~mittlng the monthly record of juvcniles incarcer- ated in the Collier County jail for the months of March and April 1981. Filed. S. petition recoived May 22, 1981 supportinq the City and the County for their offortD to ~stablishing a bike path systom and containing four paqes of signaturos. xc County Engineer, Filed. 6. Lottcr dated May 20, 1901 from Michael C. Walton, Attorney for Muriel M. and William F Seymore, objecting on their bchnlf to a petition filed by Don~ld E. and Phyllis ~. Powless to vacato Lots 15 nnd 16, Block 185, Golden Gate, Unit G., and requesting notification ðS to the BCC's decision re aarn~ whon final. xc County Engineer, Filed. 7. Letter d~ted May 20, 1981 from John M. Birnie, ropresenting Muriel Seymour, objecting on her behalf to the vacation of a Lots 15 , 16, Block 185, Golden Gate. xc County Enqineer, riled. 8. Copy of the minutes of The Naples City Council, May 6, 19B1. Filed. PðCJ8 91 .----------.----------------..,.------- . . , c:J c=J :=J , . ., . ' ----------------------.--------- --, May 26, 1981 9. Copy of the Colden CAto community Center ~dvisory Committe. meeting minuteD of Match 31,1901, note of no ~oeting held on April, 1981 and copies of calendars fot both months re activities at the Community Center. FUod. ,~. . . . . . . . . . * . . There being no further buslnoßs for tho good of tho County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair - Times 3s57 P.M. BO~RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ~ .. : r" . -: 4 ~ ' .I c (' ,.., .': '~, ~ ,,". \' ". II &COK 061 PACE 813 Peg e 92 -------------------------------. ~