Agenda 04/12/2011 Item # 8A
Agenda Changes
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
April 12, 2011
Continue Item 7A to the Aoril26, 2011 BCC Meetinl! This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. DOA-PL2010-1052: OIde
Cypress Development, LTD &Vita Pima, LLC, represented by Chris Mitchell of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. and Richard
Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., request a change to the previously approved Olde Cypress
Development of Regional Impact DRI, in accordance with Florida Statutes, Subsection 380.06(19). proposed modifications
will add 63.9 acres into the DRI boundary, amend Map H, and remove the 3.9 acre park requirement to incorporate this
change. The subject property consisting of 60H acres is located in Sections 21 and 22, Range 48 South, Township 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. (Companion to PUDZ-PL2010-1054 and PUDA-PL2010-388) (Commissioner Henning's request)
CONTINUE ITEM 8A TO THE APRIL 2611 2011 BCC
MEETING: THIS ITEM REQUIRES EX PARTE
DISCLOSURE BE PROVIDED BY COMMISSION
MEMBERS. SHOULD A HEARING BE HELD ON THIS
ITEM, ALL PARTICIPANTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
SWORN IN. PUDZ-PL2010-1054: VITA PIMA, LLC,
REPRESENTED BY CHRISTOPHER R. MITCHELL, P.E.
OF WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A., AND RICHARD D.
YOV ANOVICH OF COLEMAN, YOV ANOVICH &
KOESTER, P.A., REQUEST A REZONE FROM THE
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A SPECIAL
TREATMENT (ST) OVERLAY FOR A PROJECT
KNOWN AS HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD, AND THE
AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT, TO THE
RPUD ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT
OF A MAXIMUM 125 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
UNITS & 33 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND ASSOCIATED
ACCESSORY USES. THE 65.29:1: ACRE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE
ROAD (CR 846) APPROXIMA TEL Y 330 FEET EAST OF
OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD IN SECTION 21,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FL (COMPANION: DOA-PL2010-1052 & PUDA-
PL2010-388) (COMMISSIONER HENNING'S REQUEST)
Continue Item 8B to April 26, 2011 BCC Meetinl!: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDA-PL2010-388, Olde
Cypress Development, LTD, represented by Chris Mitchell of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich,
Esquire of Coleman, Y ovanovich & Koester, P .A., request a PUD Amendment for the Olde Cypress PUD. The PUD
Amendment request is to reduce the project density from 1,100 dwelling units to 942 dwelling units and remove the
requirements of trails and a park (3.9 acres minimum) in the Olde Cypress PUD/DRI. Subject property is located in the
OIde Cypress subdivision, Sections 21 & 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FL. (Companion: DOA-
PL2010-1052, Olde Cypress DRI & PUDZ-PL2010-1054, HD Development RPUD) (Commissioner Henning's request)
Withdraw Item lOG: Recommendation to approve a form Easement Agreement for use between Collier County and the
Beachfront Property Owners requiring Property Owners to provide public beach access in exchange for publicly funded
major beach renourishment, vegetation planting and dune restoration to the subject property. (Staff's request)
Move Item 16A13 to Item 10J: Recommendation to enter into a contract for services for AIM Engineering to
complete a feasibility study with conceptual plans for pedestrian or bicycle facilities at the 1-75 Immokalee
Rd. Interchange in the amount up to $315,000 (FDOT Project #416237-1-38-01). (Commissioner Henning's request)
Continue Item 16C2 to April 26, 2011 BCC Meetinl!: Recommendation to approve a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
contract, agreement #1IHM-3E-09-21-01-026, with the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management, in the
amount of $240,000, to apply towards costs associated with the installation of 1,430 linear feet of six-inch High Density
Polyethylene leachate pipe at Collier County's Landfill and authorize corresponding budget amendments. (Staff's request)
Move Item 16D9 to Item 101 (to be heard immediatelv followinl! Item 10El: Recommendation to approve and authorize
the Chairman to sign a Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release with Johnson Engineering for the total value of $134,000
to resolve any and all claims and issues associated with the Goodland Boat Park and approve and authorize the Chairman
to sign award of Contract 09-5262-S to Johnson Engineering for Engineering Services for Collier County. (Staff's request)
Move Item 16G4 to Item 13A: and has been reQuested to be heard at 11:30 a.m.: Recommendation to authorize the
County Attorney to take all necessary action, including filing a lawsuit, to evict Gregory Shepard from his present location
at the Immokalee Regional Airport, and pursue any holdover rent, damages, and costs that may be due and owing to the
Airport Authority. (Commissioner Coletta's request)
Move Item 16H4 to Item 9H: Commissioner Henning requests Board approval for reimbursement regarding attendance at
a function serving a Valid Public Purpose. Attended Chabad of Naples Annual Benefit Evening & Gala April 1 0, 2011 at
the Ritz-Carlton in Naples, FL $150 paid from Commissioner Henning's travel budget (Commissioner Henning's request)
Continue Item 16K3 to April 26, 2011 BCC Meetinl!: Recommendation to authorize the County Attorney to file a lawsuit
on behalf of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, against SURETY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, in the
Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, to recover damages incurred by the
County, as a result of contracted work, for the repair to the Pollution Control Laboratory in Building "H", 3rd Floor, in the
amount of $99,492.99, plus costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys fees. (County Attorney Staff's request)
Note:
Item 16A 7: Section III, page 4 of the Addendum shall be revised to state, in part ".. unless either party provides the other
with at least sixty (60) days notice of non-renewal" rather than one hundred and eighty (180) days. (This change is for
consistency with the original agreement and to promote ease in tracking by staff.) (Staff's request)
Time Certain Items:
Item 9G to be heard at 11:00 a.m.
Item 13A to be heard at 11:30 a.m.
Item 8C to be heard at 1:00 p.m.
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
he held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-PL201O-1054: Vita Pima,
LLC, represented by Christopher R. Mitchell, P.E. of Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Richard D.
Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, I'.A., is requesting a Rezone from the
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district with a Special Treatment (ST)
Overlay for a project that is known as the HD Development JU>UD, and the Agricultural (A) zoning
district, to the RPUD zoning district to allow for development of a maximum of 125 single-family
residential units and 33 multi-family units, and associated accessory uses. The 65.29X acre subject
property is located along the north side of Immokalee Road (CR 846) approximately 330 feet east of
Olde Cypress Boulevard in Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
(Companion to DOA-PL2010-J052 and PUDA-PL201O-388)
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staffs findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above refercnced pctition and render a decision regarding this PUD
amendment petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and
regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERA nONS:
The HD Development PUD project was approved in Ordinance Number 05-65 on November 15,
2005. A copy of the ordinance is included with the application materials. The subject site at that
time consisted of 46* acres. The petitioner is seeking to add 18.7i: acres of agriculturally zoned
lands to the project. The original HD Development PUD was approved for a maximum of 104
dwelling units at a maximum density of 2.23 units per acre. The 104 units were to consist of a
maximum of 71 single-family units and 33 multi-fanlily units. This amendment proposes a
maximum of 158 dwelling units which results in a density of 2.4 units per acre. The change will
increase the number of units from 104 dwelling units (71 single-family and 33 multi-family units),
to 158 dwelling units which will consist of a maximum of 125 single-family residents; the
originally approved maximum of 33 multi-family units will be unchanged (see Exhibit A, Section
D in the PUD document/ordinance.)
In the companion amendment to the aide Cypress PUD (PUDZ-PL201O-388), the petitIOner
proposes to eliminate 158 dwelling units which will allow the HD Development to be added to the
aIde Cypress DRI without increasing the maximul11 number of dwelling units allowed in the DR!.
The companion amendment to the aIde Cypress DRI Development Order (DOA-PL2010-1052)
proposes to add the 63.9-acre HD Development PUD into the DRI boundary.
Currently the petitioner seeks to repeal Ordinance Number 05-65 by adopting a new ordinance that
-, allows the changes noted previously. The petitioner is also revising the property development
standards as explained later in this report, the removal of an earlier affordable housing payment
Packet Page -294-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
commitment, and the approval of two deviations that were not addressed in the 2005 action. The
Master Plan for the proposed amendment depicts generalized areas of development and traffic
circulation.
When originally submitted, the petItIOner proposed changing the project name from HD
Development to Vita Tuscana. The petitioner abandoned that plan. The project has retained its
original name ofHD Development; however, some documents in the application still have the Vita
Tuscana name. Those references are for this project-HD Development PUD.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order
to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinanccs. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building pcrmit include
building pennit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is gcneratcd by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly reiated to the value of the improvements. Please
note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
The subject site is designated Urban/Urban Mixed Use District, as described in the Future Land
Use Element (FLUE) and depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth
Management Plan. This designation allows a base density of four dwelling units per acre
(du/ac). The proposed density is 2.4 du/ac. Comprehensive Planning Staff has reviewed this
petition and has found it consistent with the applicable policies ofthc Futurc Land Use Element.
A detailed analysis of thc projcct's consistency with the FLUE, and any othcr relevant GMP
Elements is contained in the attached Staff Report.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC heard this petition on February 17, 2011 and continued the petition hearing to March
17,2011, and by a vote 01'8 to 0, with Commissioner Ebert abstaining, recommended forwarding
this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the following changes to be made to the PUD document:
Exhibit B:
1. Revise Exhibit B, Table I, footnote #2 to remove the last sentence as it was superfluous;
and
2. Remove Item B as the accompanying deviation had been withdrawn thercfore this section
was no longer relevant.
Packet Page -295-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
Exhibit F:
1. Landscape 2.A: Correct the name of Exhibit G Irom Olde Cypress South Buffer to
Schematic Buffer Design; and
2. Landscape 2.B: Add "precast or" before the word masonry.
3. General Commitments 4.A-C: Remove this section as these issues will be addressed via an
agreement between the property owner and the residents/homeowners' association.
Exhibits I and J:
Remove these exhibits as they will be addressed via an agreement between the propelty
owner and the residents/homeowners' association.
The petitioner has made these revisions to the PUD document that IS included III the draft
ordinance.
Because there are letters of opposition to some portions of this petition, this petition cannot be
placed on the Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Ot1iee and is found to be legally
sufficient. This item requires a minlmul11 of four affirmative votes. STW
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request subject to the
attached PUD Ordinance.
PREPARED BY:
Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Land Development Services
Department, Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation
Attachments: I) Staff Report
2) Application
3) Back-up infommtion
4) Ordinance
Packet Page -296-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 8.A.
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
PUDZ-PL2010-1054: Vita Pima, LLC, represented by Christopher R. Mitchell, P.E. of Waldrop
Engineering, P.A., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coieman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.,
is requesting a Rezone from the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district
with a Special Treatment (ST) Overlay for a project that is known as the HD Development RPUD,
and the Agricultural (A) zoning district, to the RPUD zoning district to allow for development of
a maximum of 125 single-family residential units and 33 multi-family units, and associated
accessory uses. The 65.29:t acre subject property is located along the north side of Immokalee
Road (CR 846) approximately 330 feet east of Olde Cypress Boulevard in Section 21, Township
48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to DOA-PL2010-1052 and PUDA-
PL2010-388)
Meeting Date: 4/12/2011
Prepared By
Name: DeselemKay
Title: Planner, Principal, Engineering & Environmental Ser
3/4/20]] 2:48:59 PM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, CDES
Date: 3/2]/20]] ] :22:52 PM
Name: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director - CDES Engineering Serviees,Comprehensive
Date: 3/22/201 1 4:57:36 PM
Name: BellowsRay
Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 3/22/20] 1 6:23:02 PM
Name: FederNonnan
Packet Page -297-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati
Date: 3/23/20] 1 10:44:45 AM
Name: WilliamsSteven
Title: Assistant County Attorney,County Attorney
Date: 3/23/2011 3:20:30 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Tit]e: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning
Date: 3/24/2011 9:20:4] AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 3/28/2011 12:03: 17 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 4/4/201111:5]:45 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 4/4/20]] 1 :26:26 PM
Packet Page -298-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
o;rn~r County
~;:;~#>~''O'"!It~'j,,,~W'fi''~';t_~",,''>'''''''''':~~'''imf
STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING & REGULATION
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17,2011
SUBJECT:
PUDZ-PL201O-J054; HD DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) (COMPANIONS TO DOA-PL20JO-I052 &
PUDZ-PL20 1 0-388)
PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT/AGENT:
Owner! Applicant
Agents:
Olde Cypress Development, Ltd.
and Vita PIMA LLC
2647 Professional Cirele
Naples, FL 34119
Chris Mitchell
Waldrop Engineering, PA
28100 Bonita Grande Drive
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
Richard D. Y ovanovich
Coleman, Y ovanovich & Koester, P.A.
Northern Trust Ba.'1k Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an
application for a rezone from the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district
with a Special Treatment CST) Overlay, for a project that is known as the HD Development
RPUD, and the Agricultural (A) zoning district, to the RPUD zoning district to allow for
development of a maximum of 125 single-family residential units and 33 multi-family units, and
associated accessory uses.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The 65.29", acre subject propcrty is located along the nortll side of Immokalce Road (CR 846)
approximately 330 feet east of Olde Cypress Boulevard in Section 21, Township 48 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map and proposed PUD Master Plan on
the following pagcs)
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 1 of 15
Packet Page -299-
\_,~~
1
I !-
, <
I
I
!*i
'5
~~
c"
~~
"
"
!5:
Il
10-1
i~
I
!--l
----r-
i
]">>':>5OlWN
I .' ;r,~~'~~;rJI' 1l-:i-'----~---!
. !!" L~ ~;,;! ~ 1!'Ij,~ '~i
J "' I~! ill ?J i'.{~/ LIl~1 '":;:~"'~"":m"
I u;~ 1 1111';u1~ ii iUr.
~ g ,';. ~ II 11~ ;; Iii ' ;
; . I 1~'_ ~ if! '~';:'1'" ~::! 1 ~o~' ~ i-.J oil
d-J -: - """ I ,; ;' :: ' I - 8
, ~~ -T-- - -i--~-
1,.,1 , I ' :1 '
~ ~~ L ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
O'?~ri~ll~r~~~--jl l~ ' ,,".~~'!~~
11;- u1r 'j r L
I l!" i=-t-~--i'lll! ";: : I, 'Ii
'I__~_~ 1 :::~n" ~ _ jl1 : ~\ _ _ ~
~-C~ '~"."""'=i'r.."'.', (,I.-.,.t.j.1\~_J.'~.. 'f' ~~;:-. i ~,
------ ------ 1,;1 >'-;J.vl"~"-lN' -: -"---"-- r- ~... ,", " ~~ ~~"
---- IS!'!!! l!i r Ln:'-l~fa];:."~ll;~TI'~!. le.,.I j'-S'[,;1c." .. I," l~
I,ffi~ '=; ,,- ~~ ~~ I~ :;r~d~ ~~
" . 0' ',,",'~ "J~ . I.'
,
,
gt
~ ;!:
; ~
o
>-
"
"
o
u
j"""'
~e
~ ~
w
w
~
"
*~
~e "'
I
O.D~ N01~N'^,1
Packet Page -300-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
-'11
!....
:'" 0)
::l
~
,
~
!
, ,
0'
,"
, i
g,
I ~
I
. "
~~
i
~ ,
, ,
i
~~
!;L.31~1.~'l11<'
,
~...
~"
'\
0...
<C
~
C)
Z
Z
o
N
'!]
,
~I
g
,
Oi
~,
o
N
,
~
a.
N
Cl
:J
tL
..
Z
o
f-
f-
UJ
tL
!
0...
<C
~
z
o
f-
<C
()
o
....J
I
I:
_Lj
ill i'lli I !!
iI, .il!.J
I' III ! ,
I I~. J > t
! , ~ ~ !"I
~ ! m ,
t -, !!! ~ I
, ! , ! '
" I II ~
I! ." . _
i! ...
~ , ;
"I i HI, '11
,
i~
II~ .
, i ! ~
I,:. i .
~ lill ~=1i
r"lllffi' '.
::.: f'
~ '
m
o .
~5 1U I: _ '.
.2: 11~1 t
I.
~\
1
~
~
"
~
>
^
m
~
m
o
"
d~
_oj
I
,
,
1
'-,
Ii
ji
.___-.1
,
,
,
,
,I
.'
I,
I
,
u,
II
. ,
,
~', I
II I
1&
il J,
.. I ~
~I : ~
il ~ . ,....-i.(..
,; I (1\ H : ~J"
J~ ,-J, II ~ '11P11'
Olli rr:, Z h'
Z ~I P :' )> I w
'~II',I :,: ,j" ;11
'1'1 ".
~ f,' ! tr~! f
.,,1., ,
" '" '
, I ri!!~ i
i ~ 1i
"'I
il.
l" ;~
,
j'
.i
'LAN ""V"'UN~
..........
_.. ...............' ...
4/12/2011 Item 8A
,
,
,
I, L
'I
,
I
at
il!
i I
l i i
I: :
, I ! I
, .'
I g~ t
t 1 l!!
t ~ I t
I "I !I
, 'II
~ ii
, ,
i I I
,..WI! I
d!,.U I
,II'
1-- i i
, ,
~L
, '-----
II
,
, .
,
- ,
i II I
" ,
i : ~ ~ ! :
" I ~ 'I '
?' ?' 1
t, I 1 'r
' .
,
,
I
'.
"
--.,
,
t
i
II
Ii
I
~,,".
i!:~
!Ii ,
,I. o'
, ! j ~~
I' I '
I, i ...l .
r-'--
I -;-':}'
, .j I,
I ~ ,~
I Jl ~1
ij ~
I
!
'1'1 '
*~ J
'1ft
;
I.
II
i'
z-
- 8G....,'_.,""
11m'" .
! ~. . " .
'~ . '
~. . .' .
,
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
CLIENT: VITA PIMA. LLC
PUD MASTERPLAN
F_XHlBIT "C"
I.I~
r~"'::~~~~i
;:l~:i:'::.~~i~j:,'~~:;;:~~::l':
Packet Page -301-
..-...;:::::.-~...,~..,_._--~-..-.~......
i~
II
li
!
i
,
_.!~-
,
,
,
,
~,
6:
~:
>,
r,
^,
~,
I~:
"'
~"
~:
,
,
J
,/
{
I
1
o
!
~ n
Ii ,
r::;;:::::::=_::=\::::::l
F-::-::'"-"O"O--=;~
J I"
r _____nn___ .-~ i:
I I I II
~_t I II
1--- - ~----r-- - ;~~"O~-::jj
: ~ ~
,._.NO[V'-""N'
1;=::=::;;:::
,
~
i
,
,
,
,
,
!
,7!
,i
.!'~~
!:kj
!f,'I!
, " i
!'
'.
-:::r:Jl
..,
Ji
:,
Ii
,
,
_2 ........
~"""-""'.",
"'" 1'''1''
lii'lll' '!
I,lii 'I' I' I,
:!~il U H U
"'11'"''''
rl 'I J I. 0
'I'l~. ; : i
UtI;:, i:
Hili ~. i I
','111 ,",
l:j .!,
; ~ i' ~
I~
~
~
^
~
.
m
<
m
i~
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
CLIENT: VITA PIMA, LLC.
rUD EXIlJUIT "W
Packet Page -302-
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
"
,
,
"
"
"
,
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
,
,
"
::
"
"
"
,
'"
"
,
"
,/~(
! II'
'oj IIi
'I ::1
i ::.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
'> ::
"
"
"
"
"
::
,.
,
:
"
"
"
,
,
,
,
1
,-
"
.'
,
l
.
I
!
!
.g
!
4/12/2011 Item 8A
,"
_.1
,
,
"
,
,
,
,
,
"
:
,
"
"
"
,
"
,
"
~',
"
!!
11
i
,
,
:
,
,
,
:
,
,
,
,
:
:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
i
~
i
c--,.
: j
: i
,(
:
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
_Z ::"._..
I~I~
;,,,!,"~"":
.==t.fi~.:i~-~'~~j'-;
4/12/2011 Item 8A
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The HD Development PUD project was approved in Ordinance Number 05-65 on November 15,
2005. A copy of the ordinance is included with the application materials. The subject site at that
time consisted of 46", acres. The petitioner is seeking to add 18.7", acres of agriculturally zoned
lands to the project. The original HD Development PUD was approved for a maximum of 104
dwelling \ll1its at a maximum density of 2.23 units per acre. The 104 units were to consist of a
maximum of 71 single-family units and 33 multi-family units. This amendment proposes a
maximum of 158 dwelling units which results in a density of 2.4 units per acre. The change will
increase the number of units from 104 dwelling units (71 single-family and 33 multi-family
units), to a total of 158 which will consist of a maximum of 125 single-family residents; the
originally approved maximum of 33 multi-family units will be unchanged (see Exhibit A,
Section D in the POO document/ordinance.)
In the companion amendment to the Olde Cypress POO (PUDZ-PL201O-388), the petitioner
proposes to eliminate 158 dwelling units which will allow the HD Development to be added to
the Olde Cypress DR! without increasing the maximum number of dwelling units allowed in the
DR!, The companion amendment to the Olde Cypress DR! Development Order (DOA-PL2010-
1052) proposes to add the 63.9-acre HD Development POO into the DR! boundary.
Currently the petitioner seeks to repeal Ordinance Number 05-65 by adopting a new ordinance
that allows the changes noted previously. The petitioner is also revising the property
development standards as explained later in this report, the removal of an earlier affordable
housing payment commitment, and the approval of two deviations that were not addressed in the
2005 action. The Master Plan for the proposed amendment depicts generalized areas of
development and traffic circulation.
When originally submitted, the petitioner proposed changing the project name from HD
Developrnent to Vita Tuscana The petitioner abandoned that plan. The project has retained its
original name of HD Development; however some documents in the application still have the
Vita Tuscana name. Those references are for this project-HD Development POO.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Treeline Drive, developed single-family residential uses, and a golf coursellake within
the Olde Cypress project that was approved for a density of 2. I units per acre (to be
decreased to 1.75 units per acre if the pending DR! and PUD amendments are approved),
with a zoning designation of PUD (Olde Cypress). The maximum building height
limitations for this project are 35 feet for single-family attached and detached, zero lot
line, two-family & duplex, and townhouse units; and 45 feet for multi-family dwellings
(Ordinance # 00-37).
East: Preserve and developed commercial areas within the commercially designated area of the
Olde Cypress PUD. Building height limitation for all commercial uses in the Olde
Cypress POO is 50 feet above grade. (Ordinance # 00-37)
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1/31111
Page 2 of 15
Packet Page -303-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
South: Immokalee Road, then six 5 acre Agriculturally zoned tracts, five of which are
undeveloped; the developed Satumia Lakes subdivision, approved at 3.13 dwelling units
per acre, which has a zoning dcsignation of PUD (Rigas PUD); the Heritage Greens golf
course community, approved at a density of 2.1 units per acre, with a zoning designation
ofPUD (Ordinance #97-13)
West: Recreation tracts within the Olde Cypress subdivision, with a zoning designation of PUD
(Olde Cypress) (Ordinance # 00-37).
..:t'. ':'.'~i-
-- ";:,::~",,
. ' . _, , ; _' }.f,
-,~..' ",Jj,,,\:,,{i'~
~~ ,"!~T:"''.'I~~:l _4 '~l P
1,. , .
Aerial Photo (subject site depiction is approximate)
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN I(;M1') CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is designated UrbanlUrban Mixed Use
District, as contained in thc Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and depicted on the Future Land
Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan. 'n1is designation allows a base density of
four du/ac. The proposed density is 2.4 du/ac.
Staff bclicves the project is consistent with FLUE Objective 7 and subsequent Policies 7.1
through 7.4 regarding Smart Growth principles for interconnections, loop road, sidewalks/trails,
and various other Smart Growth principles. A complete analysis is the July 20, 2010 memo from
Comprehensive Planning staff, A copy of that memo is attached.
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1/31/11
Page 3 of 15
Packet Page -304-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's PUD
Traffic Impact Statement (nS) included in the application back-up material and the PUD
documents to ensure the PUD documents contain the appropriate language to address this
project's potential traffic impacts, and to offer a recommendation regarding GMP Transportation
Element Policy 5.1. Those policies require the review of all rezone requests with consideration
of their impact on the overall transportation system, and specifically note that the County should
not approve any request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or
projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) within the five-year planning
period unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Transportation Planning staff has
determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this
project within the five-year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found
consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of tlle Growth Management Plan
(GMP). Mitigation is not required.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has
evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents. The PUD meets the minimum of
twenty-five percent preservation acreage. The native vegetation on site is 64.9 acres; 16.23
(25%) is required to be preserved. The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP and staff recommends that
this amendment petition be found consistent with the pertinent objectives, goals and policies of
the CCME.
GMP Conclusion:
The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed
rezoning to CPUD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of
consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval,
approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the
FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff
believes the petition is consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the
GMP discussion. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as
previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent
with the CCME. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with
the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria
upon which a recommendation rnust be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code
(LDC) Subsection IO.02.l3.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as
the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.03.05.1, Nature oj Requirements oj Planning Commission
Report Creferred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the
rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below,
under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses:
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 4 of 15
Packet Page -305-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Environmenlal Review: Environmental Services staff is recommending approval subject to the
Enviromnental condition contained in Exhibit F of the PUD document. A hearing was not
required before the Environmental Advisory Commission (EAC) per Collier County Code of
Ordinances Part One, Chapter 2, Article VIII. Division 23. - Environmental Advisory Council.
Trans/Jortation Review.' Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. Transportation Division staff has
recommended approval subject to the adoption of the Transportation Development Commitments
provided in Exhibit F of the attached PUD Ordinance.
Zoning Services Review: Tbe petitioner has revised the Master Plan to remove the Tract
designations, however the overall project design as to the location of the preserve areas and the
general depiction of the single-family and multi-family dwelling areas rcmain essentially the
same. TIle proposed Master Plan shows f,'feater site development detail with lot lines depictions
provided. The general configuration of the intcrnal roadway systcm is also shown as wcll.
This amendment proposes several changes to the property development regulations from what
was approved in Ordinance Number 2005-61 as shown below.
,---
Ordinance # 2005-65 Amendment proposal 2
----
Lot Area 9,000 square feet 6,000 square feet
Lot Width 60 feet interior 50 feet for both
65 feet corner
Front setback 23 feet 1 19 feet
Side Yard Setback 6 feet for 1 story 5 feet for both
7.5 for 2 story
Building Height 35 feet with a maximum of 1 35 feet zoned height, maximum of two
story--zoned height; no actual
Principal Buildings height provided stories
- ._~~----....._.._._-~
Minimum Floor Area 2,400 square feet 1,600 square feet
- ,~---_._-
1 The existing ordinance contains a footnote that allows the reduction to 18 feet in certain
circumstances, so there really is no change
2 No changes are proposed to the multi-family area; changes are only proposed for the single-
family unit type.
The use list has been revised to exclude a clubhouse from the single-family residcntial arca. The
development standards contained in Exhibit B of the PUD documents reflect a design approach
that would allow construction of a compact and clustered dcvelopmcnt.
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131/11
Page 5 of 15
Packet Page -306-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the
surrounding land uses. However, staff would note that in reviewing the appropriateness of the
requested uscsldensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of
both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and
densities, development standards Cbuilding heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building
mass, building location and orientation, architcctural features, anlount and type of open space
and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc. Specifically, staff notes single-family residential
building heights are proposed to increase from onc story to two stories.
As illustrated in the aerial photograph located on page 2 of the staff report, the surrounding
zoning discussion of this staff report, and the Master Plan, the site is bounded to the north, east
and west by the OIdc Cypress project--either prcserve areas and commcrcial areas (east); or
recreational uses (west); or roadway (Treeline Drive), single-family homes or golf course area to
the north. That project was approved at a density of 2.1 units per acre. Olde Cypress PUD
appears to have been approved with uses similar to what was approved, and again proposed, for
the HD Development PUD. There are no new uses proposed as part of this amendment to the
HD Development.
The proposed property development regulations for the single-family units in HD Development
are similar to what is approved for single-family detached units in Olde Cypress as shown below:
Olde Cypress as approved HD Development amendment
proposal
Lot Area 6,000 square feet 6,000 square feet
Lot Width 60 feet 50 feet
Front setback 25 feet 1 19 feet
Side Yard Setback 5 feet 5 feet
Building Height 35 feet zoned height (no mention of 35 feet zoned height with a maximum
Principal Buildings actual height or number of stories) of 2 stories
Minimum Floor Area 1,200 square feet 1,600 square feet
The PUD contains a footnote to allow a reduction to 10 feet for a garage and 20 feet the
remaining structures if two parking spaces are provided in an enclosed side-entry garage
Treeline Drive separates this project from all residential development in Olde Cypress except for
a small portion along the north property line as sho"'TI below:
HD Development, PUDZ.PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 6 of 15
Packet Page -307-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
In the previous zoning action, the developer of the HD Development agreed to provide an
enhanced buffer to be placed along a portion of the northem property line. That conunitment
will remain, as explaincd in PUD document, Exhibit F.2.A. In any case, both projects will be
developed with similar property development regulations as minimum standards. The density
proposed for HD Development at 2.4 wlits per acre is somewhat higher than what is approved
for Olde Cypress (2.1 units pcr acrc), but staffbclicvcs roadway scparation of Treeline Drive and
the enhanced buffer will ameliorate any perceived incompatibility. It QPpears from the aerial
photos and the plat for Olde Cypress, Unit] (Plat Book 32, specifically pages 3 and 5) that the
lots developed in Oldc Cyprcss arc largcr than the minimum allowcd lot sizes, however both
projects will be single-family use subdivisions, so the uses are compatible. The multi-family
developmcnt area abuts a commcrcially dcsignatcd arca of Olde Cyprcss.
Deviation Discussion:
The petitioner is seeking tViO deviations from thc rcquirements of the LOCo The deviations are
listed in PUD Exhibit E.
Deviation #1 seeks l'clieffrom LDC Section 6.06.01.0 that requires a local road right-of-way to
be a minimum of 60 feet wide, to allow a 50-foot wide right-of-way for roadways within the
development.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant provided the following justification for this deviation:
The internal rights of way shall be private and shall be maintained by the HOA. The
proposed deviation allows for design flexibility as 'Fell as consislency with right-ol-way
widths approved for the HD Development RPUD. The reduced righl-ol-way width allows
for single family developmel1l withinlhe parcel. For Ihese reasons, the proposed deviation
will not negatively impacl public heallh, safely or welfare.
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131/11
Page 7 of 15
Packet Page -308-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: This deviation would allow the developer to provide
narrower roadways within ilie development. The HOA can control traffic via posted speed limits
and project design. Since the roadways will not be county-maintained, staff does not object.
Therefore, the deviation seems appropriate.
Zoning and Land Development Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation.
findiru! that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that
"the element mav be waived without a detrimental effect on ilie health. safety and welfare of the
community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 .B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation
is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of
such regulations."
Deviation #2 seeks relief from Collier County Code of Ordinances Chapter 22, Article 4,
Section 22-1 12.2 that requires a 4 to I slope to a depili of 10 feet from control, then a 2 to 1 slope
to the bottom of the excavation, to allow for 4 to I slope to a depili of 7 feet from control
elevation, then a 2 to 1 slope to the bottom of the excavation (20' maximum).
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant provided the following justification for this deviation:
The proposed deviation allows for design flexibility for stormwater management features
internal to the development and will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare.
Furthermore, the proposed deviation will not impact the form or function of the on-site
lakes.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: This deviation would allow the developer to potentially
get more fill from the lakes thus decreasing development costs. Staff does not object.
Zoning and Land Development Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation.
finding that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.l3.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that
"the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safety and welfare of the
community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation
is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of
such regulations. "
LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1.2 states, "When pertaining to ilie rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shalI
show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires
the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the
additional criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold,
non-italicized font]:
PUD Findine:s: LDC Subsection 1O.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the
CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with ilie following criteria"
(Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font):
HD Development, PUDZ,PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 8 of 15
Packet Page -309-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
1. The suitability of the areafor the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
Staff has reviewed the proposed amendments and believes the changes are compatible with
the development approved in the area with the additional buffering proposed by the
petitioner. Therefore, the commitments made by the applicant provide adequate
assurances that the proposed change will not adversely affect living conditions in the area.
1. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions 10 be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be
required to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that
appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of
infrastructure will be provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals,
objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based
on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the
overall GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and b11ffering and screening
requirements.
Staff has provided an extensive review of the proposed changes and believes that the
project will be compatible with the surrounding area.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the
LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project
at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP
Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must
comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development
approvals are sought.
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1/31/11
Page 9 of 15
Packet Page -310-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as road capacity, wastewater
disposal system, and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the
commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities
requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The petitioner is seeking two deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the
purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06A).
This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be
required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviation
proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section lO.02.13.A.3, the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect
on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section lO.02.13.B.5.h, the
petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a
degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the
Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the
deviations.
Rezone Findinl!:s: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1 states, "When pertaining to fue rezoning of land,
the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County
Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed
change in relation to fue following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are
provided in boldfont):
I. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of
the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
The zoning analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed changes. Staff is of the
opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the
project to be compatible with neighborhood development with the additional buffering
commitments provided by the petitioner. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be
deemed consistent with the GMP.
2, The existing land use pattern;
Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and
Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis.
Staff believes the proposed changes are appropriate given the existing land use pattern.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;
The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district because most of the
subject property is already zoned PUD. The Agriculturally zoned parcels that are being
HD Development. PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 10 of 15
Packet Page -311-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
added demonstrate a reasonable extension of the PUD zoning in this Urban Mixed Use
district per the GMP. The land to be added is bordered by the PUD zoned lands of Old
Cypress to the west and north. .
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposedfor change.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district bonndaries are logically drawn, bringing
the agriculturally zoned land within the FLUE Urban Mixed Use District into a more
urban zoning district.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with
the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner purchased adjacent
agriculturally zoned land that he wishes to develop as part of the existing HD Development
PUD. Without rezoning, the agriculturally zoned tracts could not be developed with the
proposed property development regulations.
6. Whether Ihe proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood;
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change, with the commitments made by the
applicant, is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future
Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore, the proposed change should not
adversely impact living conditions in the area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes
or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this
time.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the
LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are desigued to reduce
the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other
specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
If this petition were approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the
applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This
project's property development regulations do not indicate that exceedingly tall structures
would be included in the project; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 11 of 15
Packet Page -312-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
and air to adjacent areas; thus the development proposed, if approved, should not
negatively affect light and air permeation into adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affict property values in the adjacent area;
This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or
external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors
including zoning; however zoning by itself mayor may not affect values, since value
determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be
marketed in a manner comparahle to the surrounding developments.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
Properties around this property are already developed or developing now. Therefore, the
proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent
properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public
policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with said
Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant
of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public
welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning;
The property currently has two zoning designations--Agricultural and PUD. The tracts
could be developed within the parameters of those zoning designations; however, the
petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The
petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public
hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district
and further, believes the public interest will be maintained.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County;
The petitioner proposes to develop single-family uses and multi-family uses and is
proposing property development regulations similar to what is approved for the adjacent
project. The GMP is a policy statement, which has evaluated the scale, density, and
intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban-designated areas of
Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer
commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the
HD Development, PUDZ-PL2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131111
Page 12 of 15
Packet Page -313-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
community.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed;
however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a
particular zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with
the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific
petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of
the staff report.
16. The physical characteristics of Ihe property and Ihe degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site
alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state,
and local development regulations during the sitc development plan or platting approval
process and again later as part of the building permit proccss.
17 The impact of development on the availabilily of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in Ihe Collier County Growth Management Plan and
as defined and implemented through Ihe Collier County Adequale Public Facililies Ordinance,
as amended
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all
applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as it
may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that
is responsible for jurisdictional clements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and
those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Servicc will be adversely impacted with
the commitments contained in the PUD document.
18. Such other faclors, standards, or criteria Ihallhe Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
shall deem important in Ihe protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The NIM meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held October 18, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. at
the Olde Cypress Clubhouse. Please refer to the minutes provided by the petitioner's agent that
are included in the application material.
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1131/11
Page 13 of 15
Packet Page -314-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on February 2, 2011.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County
Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-PL2010-1054 to the BCC with a recommendation
of approvaL
HD Development, PUDZ-PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 CCPC
Revised (2) 1/31111
Page 14 of 15
Packet Page -315-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
PREPARED BY:
~ ,
r1A /+{l(JjI_Le1YV
KAY DE' LEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
v
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Ih?/fI
I DATE
REVIEWED BY:
,..--., ,.. ..',
1/./ <', .
, '''-'-f:'.v...J () ,/ ',' /' 'i
RA mONO V. BELLOWS: ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
/. 3/~' //
DATE
)<.-._L- ;
. " ., /
-/......... . ,.x,-.I~_-. i'
LlAM D. LORENZ, JR., l>.E., DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
')
c.... -Co( - 2-c"l
DATE
APPROVED BY:
--7../
/.,-
/
l - GI_ II
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the March 22,2011 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
1') \
\ i\ I _T\m
\. V \O...c.~ i V\;Y'^-Q.~
, \
MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
3- 11 -II
DATE
HD Development, PUDZ.PL 2010-1054
February 17, 2011 eepe
Revised 1/29111
Page 14 of 14
Packet Page -316-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Co~'Y Co.u:n:ty
- -
CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM
To: Kay DeseIem, AIcp, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section
From: CoroySchmidt, AIcp, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section
Date: July 20, 2010
Subject: Future Land 11& E lenmt (FL UE) Comstency Re1iew
PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL2010-1054
PETITION NAME: Vita Tuscana RPUD
REQUEST: To rezone the 65.3 acre site from A Rural Agriculture wning clishict (approximately 18.7
acres), and HD Developrrent PUD (approximately 46.6 acres) to RPUD, Residential Planned Unit
Development, to be known as Vita Tuscana
The HD Developrrent PUD is an undeveloped Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) approved
for 104 residential cMelling units.
The new Vita Tuscana RPUD \\Quld be incorporated into the Olde Cypress DR!. The Vita Tuscana
Residential Planned Unit Development project entails up to 158 single-family residences and multi-family
residences; apportioned to 125 SF (79%) and 33 MF (21%) for a gross density of 2.41 du/ac.
An undeveloped right of way, a remnant of the existing HD developrrent PUD is to be vacated Another
configuration has been designed for streets within the Vita Tuscana RPUD.
LOCATION: The subject property is generally located in the northeast quadrant of the lrrumkalee Road
(CR846)/Olde Cypress Boulevard intersection, lying adjacently south of the Olde Cypress PUD /DR! and
adjacently north of lrrumkalee Road
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS:
The subject site is designated Uroan !Uroan Mixed Use Dishict, as contained in the Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) and depicted on the Future Land Use J'vfap (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan.
This designation allow> a base density of 4 du/ ac. The proposed density is 2.4 du/ ac.
-I-
V ita Tusmm RPUD
Packet Page -317-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
The table below illustrates the acreage figures, dw:lling unit counts and residential densities involved in
each part of the project:
Ttl ACs TtlDUs Ttl Com'[ ACs non-Com'l AC Gross Res'l Densitv
Existing DRI 538.1 1,100 12.5 525.6 2.09 DUlAC
Proposed DRI 603.4 1,100 12.5 590.9 186 DUlAC
Olde Cypress PUD 538.1 942 12.5 525.6 1.79 DUlAC
Vita Tuscana PUD 65.3 158 0.0 65.3 2.41 DUlAC
The acreage increase is reflected in the OIde Cypress ORI, and in the Vita Tuscana (fka HD Development)
PUD. Although no additional residential units are proposed for the larger DRI, the total <fuelling unit
count in the Vita Tuscana CHD Development) PUD is increased The ne,^> larger number should appear
in Vita Tuscana PUD documents. As currently proposed, the "158" number does not appear in the
aIf81ded PUD Ordinance or other relevant locations in Vita Tuscana (HD Development) PUD materials.
FL UE Policy 5.4 "Newdeudopnrnfs shall be (IJI1~Xltiblezuth and W/1~)larentaryto, the sunvw1dingland USIS, as;u
fOrth in the Lard Deuiopnrnt Cale" Comprehensive Planning leaves this dctermination to Zoning and
Land Development Review staff as part of their revicw of the pctition in its entirety.
FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies are stated below; each policy is follow:rl by staff analysis.
Objatirr 7:
In an iffort to supJXJrl the Douy, Kdll & Partners publimtion, Tounrd Better PlaCES: TIle COl11l11unityCharader Plan/Dr
Collier County Florida, pronvte S/1llrt glTTilth pJlides, and adhere to the existingdeudoprn:nt charader if Collier County
tile follav.ingzxiUies Ehall be implenrntai}Dr nelJ)deudolnrent m1d raieudopn1?Jlt projats, wlEJ'e applimble.
PoliIy 7.1:
The Cow1iy shall enwurag: deudopers and prqxrly ow TerS to anm their prO/X1ties to fronting mlledor a;1d arterial rrnds,
excrpt uhere IV sU/:h I1J1111IItiO/1 II/n be nl/de lUtlwut ziolatirl[?intasxtion sp7dngrrrzuirmrnfs if the Lard Deudopm?nt
Caie.
The proposed PUD will be accessed from Treelinc Drive, providing access onto Olde Cypress
Boulevard, then onto lmmokalee Road.
Policy 7.2:
The Cow1iyshall enmurag: internal aaL.'R5 or Imp ,wds i/1 an iffoit to llElp raiU(E illUde aJ11gostion on nearbymlle:tor and
arteJial razds a;1d minimize tiE mxl for traffic si2}1IlIs.
The PUD Master Plan shows an internal access to the developed portion of the 01de Cypress
DRl and includes a loop configuration of curvilinear streets.
Policy 73:
All'Je'u.Jand existingdeudopnD1fs shall be ermurag:d to W/lIm their ICX1l1 sh'ffis m1d their intermnrmiOl1 pints vitll
adjoining neigworiuxxls or other deudopm.?nts regmfIrss if land use fM-X? The PUD Master Plan includes such
connection to Treeline Drive internal to the Olde Cypress PUD/DRI. The Master Plan also
illustrates interconnection between the Multi-Family Tract situated at the project s southeast
corner and the adjacent OIde Cypress Preserve Commons commercial component.
-2 -
V ita TusIlm RPUD
Packet Page -318-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Policy 7.4
The Countyshall erwuraJ!! rrwdeadapnwts to pro1ide unlkable 1JJIm1UI1itie3 uitha blerd if demitie3, rDImUI1 arm
SJX1a?S, due fadlitie3 ani a raner if housingprims and Ipe5. The proposed PUD provides for more than 16
acres of preserved Native Vegetation/Conservation Area (:t 25%), for a blend of single-family
and multi-family housing opportunities, and for pedestrian access to the paths and sidewalks
existing in the Olde Cypress PUD.
Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the Vita Tuscana
RPUD rezoning may be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth
Management Plan.
ON OTY VIEW
cc: William Lorenz, PE Director, Land Development Services Department
Ray Bellow>, Planning Manager, Zoning Services Section
Mike Bosi, AI~ Comprehensive Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section
David V\eeks, AI~ Growth Managerrent Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section
Tony Russo, Jr., Senior Administrative Assistant, Public Utilities Planning & Project Management
Dept.
Chris D' Arco, Environrrental Specialist, Storrnwater & Environmental Planning Section
Mike Greene, Manager, Transportation Planning Section
FLUE File
1:ICityview Documents21Comprhensive Planning Dept. LefferslOlde Cypress DRI-PUDlPUDZ-PL2010-1054 Vita Tuscana.docx
-3 -
Vita TUill1/U RPUD
Packet Page -319-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Co~"Y County
- ~ --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2BOO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
o AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) 161 PUD REZONE (PUDZ)
o PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A)
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
PUDZ-PL2010-1054 REV,Z
Vita Tuscana RPUD (fka HD Development
RPUDI
DATE, 8/30/10
DUE: 9/28/10
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLICANT(S) VITA PIMA. LLC
ADDRESS 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE. SUITE 1201 CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34119
TELEPHONE # 239.592-7344 CELL # 239-280-6504 FAX # 239-592-7541
E-MAIL ADDRESS:KGELDER@STOCKDEVELOPMENT.COM
NAME OF AGENT WALDROP ENGINEERING. P.A.
ADDRESS 28100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE #305 CITY BONITA SPRINGS STATE FL ZIP 3413S
TELEPHONE # 239-40S-7777 CELL # 239-682-2248 FAX # 239-405-7899
E-MAIL ADDRESS:CHRISM(ci)WALDROPENGINEERING.COM
NAME OF AGENT Rich Yovanavich. Coleman. Yavanovich & Koester, P.A.
ADDRESS 4001 Tomiami Trail N.. Suite 300. Naores. Florida 34103
PHONE, 239-435-3535 FAX, 239-435.1218
EMAIL ADDRESS rvovanavichlqlcvklowfirm.cam
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Revised May2010
Packet Page -320-
<(
00
E
Q)
~
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
Co~r County
- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collieraov.net
I
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) fhat could be affected by this petition.
Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County
Commissioner's web site at httD:/lwww.collieraov.net/lndex.asDx?Daae=774
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: SEE ATTACHED
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS _CITY _STATE_ZIP_
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
Revised May2010
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Co1Mr County
~.-.
- .- ---
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.colfieraov.net
Disclosure of Interest Information
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by fhe entirefy,
fenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use addifional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
% of Ownership
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
fhe percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
c. If the property is in fhe name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of fhe frusf with fhe
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Revised May2010
Packet Page -322-
Co~r County
_ ~.....c- ~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
<(
co
E
Q)
.....
~
~
0
N
--
N
~
-- e.
"'"
Revised May20 1 0
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
WWW.collieraov.nel
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address % of Ownership
BRIAN STOCK 50%
KENNETH STOCK 50%
If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Co1N:r County
~..-.
- --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION!
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
Date subject property acquired Igj 2/10/10 leased 0 Term of lease
g.
yrs./mos.
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicafe the following:
Date of option: _
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date _
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in confracts for purchase occur
subsequent to fhe date of application, but prior to the dafe of fhe final public hearing, it
is the responsibilify of the applicanf, or agent on his behalf, fo submit
a supplemenfal disclosure of interest form.
PROPERTY LOCATION
Detailed le!!al description of tbe prODertv covered bv tbe application: (If space is inadequate, attach
on separafe page.) If request involves change fo more than one zoning district, include separate legal
description for property involved in each dislrict. Applicanl shall submil four (4) copies of a recent survey
(completed within fhe lasf six monfhs, maximum I" to 400' scale) if required fo do so af fhe pre-
applicafion meeling.
NOTE: The applicanf is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If quesfions arise concerning
the legal description, an engineer's certificafion or sealed survey may be required.
Section/Township/Range II / 48S / 26E
Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Pial Book _ Page #: _ Property 1.0. #: 00186000005: 00186760002: 00185880006:
00186560008:00186600007:00186760109:00186520006:00186760303
Mefes & Bounds Description: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Size of proDertv: 1230.5 ft. X 231 1.4 fl. = Tolal Sq. Ff. 2.844. 193 Acres65.29
Address/aenerDllocaliDn of subiecl Droperlv: NEAR THE CORNER OF IMMOKALEE RD & OLDE
CYPRESS BL YD. ACCESSIBLE FROM TREELINE OR WITHIN THE OLOE CYPRESS SUBDIVISION
PUD Disfrict (lDC 2.03.06): Igj Residential 0 Community Facilities
o Commercial 0 Industrial
Revised May201 0
Packet Page -324-
<C
co
E
Q)
.....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
N
.,-
--
"<t
Co1mr County
- ~--- --
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zonina Land Use
N OLOE CYPRESS PUD RESIDENTIAL
S ROW / COCOHATCHEE CANAL ROW
E OLOE CYPRES PUD , COMMERCIAL
w OLOE CYPRESS PUD GOLF COURSE
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so,
give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, aHach on
separate page).
Section/Township/Range 11 / 48 S / 26 E
lot:
Block:
Subdivision: OlDE CYPRESS PUD
Plat Book _ Page #: _ Property I.D. #: SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR lEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
Metes & Bounds Description:_
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a rezone from the RPUD with ST & AG zoning district(s) to the RPUD zoning
district(s).
Present Use of the Properfy: VACANT
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of fhe property: RESIDENTIAL
Original PUD Name: HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD Ordinance No.: 03.30, 05-6S
Revised May20 I 0
4/12/2011 Item 8A
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier Counfy Land Oevelopmenf Code, staff's onalysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendafion to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative sfatement describing fhe rezone request with specific reference fo the criteria noted
below. Include any backup materials and documenfation in support of the requesf.
PUO Rezone Considerations (LOC Section 10.02.13.B)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical
charaeteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other
utilities.
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified confrol and suitabilify of any proposed agreemenfs, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relafe to
arrangements or provisions to be made For the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are nof to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only affer consultation wifh the county attorney.
See Attached Evoluation Criteria
3. Conformify of the proposed PUO with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan. (This is fo include identifying what Sub-disfrict, policy or other provision
allows fhe requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or condifions of that
Sub-district, policy or other provision.)
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrietions on focation of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
S. The adequacy of usoble open space areas in existence and as proposed fo serve the developmenf.
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
6. The timing or sequence of developmenf for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilifies, both public and private.
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
See Attached Evoluotion Criteria
8. Conformity wifh PUO regulations, 0' as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to 0 degree af least equivalent to literol application of such regulafions.
Revised May20 1 0
Packet Page -326-
<(
co
E
(l)
.....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
N
.,-
--
'<t
Co1N:r County
~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collieraov.net
See Attached Evaluation Criteria
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally preciuded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use Defifions on the subiect Dropertv: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held
on this property within the lost year? D Yes ~ No
If so, what was the noture of that hearing? _
OfficiallnterDretafions or Zonina Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last yeor? 0 Yes 1SI No
If SOt please provide copies.
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been
made and fhe application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be
considered "closed" when the petitioner wifhdraws fhe applicafion through writfen notice or
ceases to supply necessary information to continue processina or of her wise actively pursue the
rezonina for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further
processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An
application deemed "closed" may be re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of
all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project
will be subject to the then current code. (LDC Section 10.03.0S.Q.)
Revised May20 1 0
Co~ gounty
- ~---
T-l1 4/12/2011 Item 8A
1 ( CvIP.e ( -
~u11
03-08-'1012:51 FBOM-
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
WWW.COLlIERQOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHoe DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(2391252-2400 FAX (2391 :152.5724
~'" :', ~ . .... .
,,,
. " ~ . '. .
",' :.' " "..
, I' ,~ ".'
i,::AO'DR.S$I'NG'e'H:e~l(I;j:ST:':: .: .:" , ,:'
n', . ~ .' '. . . .' L',," ,_ ":> 'r "ll.,"~ ...... ,. ,..... . ", . :.: .
">.i; "'" ','.;: .
.:.: '; ..:'.
Please complete the following and ~ to the Addressing Department at 23e-252.5724 or subm~ in person to the
Addressing Department at tI'Ie above address, Form must be siClned bv Addressina "arsonn!1 orfor to Qre-
aDDnoation meetinG, DleaSI! allc:tw 3 davs for GrOt"!IK!C!ina.
Not 811 items will apply to every project. Items in bold type Bfa required. FOUD NUMBERS MUST Be
PROVIDED. Forms older tIIen 6 months wUl reQuire add~iona' revlew and approval by the Addressing
Department
PETITION TYPE (Indieaf, type below, complele a sel'srate Addruslng Checkfim for eac:h Petlfion type)
o SL (Blasting perrnil)
o SO (Boat Dock Extension)
o CamivaVCircus Permit
o CU (Conditional Use)
o EX? (Excsvatlon Permit)
o FP (FItlBI Plat
o LI.A (Lot Line Adjustment)
o PNC (Project Name Change)
B PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
8 PUD Rezone
RZ (Standard Rezone)
o SOP (Site DeVlllopmenl Plan)
o SDPA (SOP Amendment)
o SOP! (Insubstantial Change to SOP)
o SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
o SIPI (Ineubs1antial cMnge to SIP)
o SNR (Street Name Change)
o SNC (Sb'eet Name Change - Unplatltld)
o TOR (Trantfer of Development Rights)
o VA (Variance)
o VRP (Vegetation Removal Perm~)
o VRSF? (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
1&1 OTHER pun Amendment
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be altachsd)
21 4826 W1/2 OF SE 114 OF SW 114 EXC S 100 FT 16.49 AC .- Po.... W I q... I A ISO POA~'S
OR 386 PG691 f I,Z-S ~ 3-30
FOLIO (Property 10) NUMBER(sl of above (attach 10, or asSOCfate with, lega/J:Jesr:rlption if more than one)
00186000005 00 r~ ~~c>coc" I 00 I '3;G:>S.:Z..OOOC::. ,() o/~c.. 7C.oa03
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (illS applicable, if a/reedy assigned)
. lOCATION MAP must be attal;:hed shOWing exact 100000tion of projecVsfte in relstio/) to nearest public road right-
of-way
. SURVEY (copy . needed only for unplatted properties)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
VITA TUSCANA
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (ffappficable)
SITe DevE~OPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projeetiWltes only)
SOP or AR # PL201 0-388
.",
PUDZ-PL2010-1054 REV:1
VIta Tuscana (fka HD Development)
DATE: 6/11/10
DUE: 7/12/10
Packet Page -328-
~
co
E
Q)
.....
T""
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
<::t
03-08-'10 12:51 FBOM-
T-113 P006/010 F-3Z0
Coil, County
- --~- -
COLI.IER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEiPARTMeNT
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
280D NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252.24OD FAX (239j252.S724
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in', condominium documents (if IiIlPliCll1ion;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
Please Check One: 181 Checklist Is to be Faxed back
o Personally Picked Up
APPLICANT NAME: CHRIS MITCHEIJ..
PHONE 405-7777 FAX 405-7899
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval
and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department.
FOR STAFF use ONLY
FLN NumberlPrlmllry) 00 1<3 {PODO Do5
Folio Number r,Q. {~ s.. ~ 000 '=-
-
Folio Number 0'0 J % Co 5. z. 0 (::> 00 Ie.
-
Folio Number OJ)' C6 L.:> -, Go 0 s-03
-
Approved by: A f'\..~ m rf.,a. ,..-
Updated I:ly:
Data:
Date:
3-CJ-(O
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
"
. '.1,
..
, .
, .:, .
I" ,J'
.' . .~.~; :;.; .:,:'
"" :.,; , ; '. .:'t".~~ :
, " . ," t. ~.; ':' ...'
.1
~~..,.
~~~
0,
"
l
"
~
t
i
0'
o.
"
.,
p
;~
~I:l
"'
"
.
./1
i __
"\ ~''',',~.!.:~'~~<-'~,''
Or:::
~l:
.~ 1("
J
1 "i
'\ 1
':,~1
'. ~; ;>. I' "00'.00
,_ s j ----
'- '
~.'"''
h .,'ii
"
! I
,I~ I
ig~ I
.,
i
n__J
: ~'
~ :' l
j' I'll'
",'la S"
,.
~::j"
,.
..
;
,
0'
~$
.
~
.1
,;~
~i
'"
,
"
0'
.
::::r 7
!!i
':!i!Stf
IS ~
"'~'-
"~~
~e;bl
~~..
0'
,n ~ \
...'t;;f'..f'~d.--
"
" I
,-.-'-----'t-.-----,'-~------- ' ,
-, I
~I~
=~ ~I~
['; ....>.~m }~Il, I!
~1;::j" ",/ /
, : .../"///>~I~ II
..,.--C_[~---- ,/ ~,,"- e ~ ~
_._._ "','",~''' ./ // " ,,~ 'I 1"'1
._____----- / ,,1 t;:r I 11.
__ , _'= "'-'OLJ I ~i ~~.':i LJI ~i~
...,....,..~.,_: :=d I'S :' ~~~
Packet Page -330- -..
i!i
i ~.
,II
,
1:<:; I
.,-
tJ1:!"
',~ I ~i
,;1,
:ii
h. ,
! ~j ;~
: ~~. .
!~! J
I ~I I
i'i I .!
I ' ~:
: ~j: ~f
~,---------------
\'~~\ =i;
)-~L ':1
.,
"
~~
.i.
.:
---:)/1
.,.
_.1--.-
~:.:
~:('
.,
"
-:--~-~,~~-(i\~-~---:-~---:c~. -~:
.'
I'
,
~
--------
.1
:;;t~
~i!!
-~
W(!,1'IFTI2J11,U'
'T_'"
.
.
.
"!----;---Lr
"
, '
'-r"",ll!'..."',.~.,:-......;;:;;"'".-:,.--
, '
----,-
,
~~_~g 15 ~ 12 U;~
"
,
"
~H
,.
~:!
,"
,
o.
~;
"
"
~lt
\'
.,
'.
l
1,,1
h~
", '
,
~
",
.
r i
,
"I'
. r
f
" I ~
" .:!ll
_',~..!;I ~ i
, .~,
, !P' ~~
~~ ~~
,.
----1; .f"
,
I.
~I
"
~~.
4/12/2011 Item 8A
~'i
;I!
rll !1'1 II' irl
'Ill hi 'I i,
1'1 ;..111 "" ,! .. ·
j~~f I': "ll ; atl i;l"
'1,11' 'Ill h11l1d !;'-
Jil'I"I-I~ I jdf: .. .I;!~ "'
"":"',1"1'1" ,I :,i' !
Ililll'lI' ,'I"i,111 !i ~';li ,
i'l "'I,ll I '!IIl! . ~'Ii~ ,
i~:uahl~t !~;id~ !- ~~ii! ~
..... I EI~rn "'~
",- L
11/'. !"
""1,1
i'ii''''
J RU~ l
;2II'I~U~fIM::~!::;;t
I
I i~
I.:~
:::<'l~
!"~i!
i ~~
jC;
.1
~j
~
II
i
.,
!i
fI
"
II
~i
tiP
!~! ~
~~" ;;
iiii!
<.l
i~1
,"
m
! ~ i i
, ! ! ~
~ i
~ ~ i I i
: ! ! ii,'
! 1 i ~ i i
. "i i i I ~
~ . i . I
!. !. l ! I !
~ ~ ;i ~ ;i i
h h ,'1 A ~~ ,i
~, ~I II .: II
~ ~"I ;(.
~~~~~il~i
~I ~i ,I,' I U ~
~ ~ .~ . ~. .
;i ~i ~ it ~ i
~~~h)~~'k
~~ ~~ ;: ;It:~f~
i!d!d~!;~nn;
<<
co
E
Q)
.....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
N
.,-
--
<q-
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
o
d. PRIVATE SYSTfM (WELL)
~_1iIj~l1J1~f_.el; 125 sinale familv homes: 33 MF units. 316 DeoDle
1Il,!'~""'\i1Iif;3.~~i!"il'IlIir;':;Ei'~~i~'"-i":-
gp~__~~l::lL~5t{C:MS4!!i\llI_~J.
A. WATER-PEAK 225.001 aDd AVERAGE DAILY 55.300 9pd
B. SEWER-PEAK 160.715 apd AVERAGE DAILY 39.500 aDd
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COlliER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED Januarv 2012
1I~1Ii.ei~ll1lf" Provide 0 brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the
method of affluen1 and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation
data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional
engineer.
i:r.,,\~i~:p!i'ol~~f;m~i1I1r.r:@"~1lL<k'f~""iSii'!A~iiM'f'~fllf the prol'ect is located wifhin the
~ii:H l.~l!_~, _ ~",'J..~_~_,_....._:~L,.........c.,,"....___._...._,.._
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage
collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities
in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement
shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and
connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building
permi1s by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreemenf to
dedicate the appropriate u1i1ity easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
l!!T;.~l!iIl'l-\;'~J""'!I'l,iliiroiiii.ii'?}i'1l'I~iji~j*~j(jii.'.liC!I-,,\j-,:~~;.c"'.'6:+Frilfi:'''1l~H'.~eRfSJ~u I . d
~'~~I~mfi~\HM~'i,_~~~.~:q~,'~..e~'!:1..~l..Ji1.I'~w~r~~a~,,_ ~":!l:;::,X:~.~~~'~,~,:,,:I;._ ,_,~';;~:~D;~Y!J,.,/<,,;;li,._"".~.;~~:, . n ess waive or
atherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating thaf there is adequate capacity to serve the projecf shall be provided.
Revised May2010
<(
z
<(
u
tI)
::J
f-
~
:>
0:
w
~
s:
c:
o
'w
'S;
is
<J>
~
5
.S!
:0
"
<l.
>-
'E
"
o
U
~
'0
u
~
Q)
0.
Q)
m
.5
U;
w
<J>
-0
c:
m
E
Q)
o
c:
o
li
E
"
<J>
c:
o
U
"
:0
m
o
<l.
Q)
a.
o
"
0.
cot-
~o
'" .
v
"
" ~
c:.8
o "
:.;::;ct!
mU-
3""
o.m
0,"
<l.<l.
<J>
Gl
-
C'II" (0 M
0:' E . co ."
s::: c..(""') N....
o cn~ t"')'~
""
0.
E
"
III
"
o
U
""
IV
Gl
<l.
~O')~
t- .~
"'00("')0
Q,oQ")o
Ol ,CI> -
co' - It)
t-CON
~VN
E~o'V
c.o .00
=C)('")coC"')
-
IV
0:
"
o
""
0.
E
"
III
"
o
u
000
"01,(')1,(')0
C.I'-I,(')M
en c--f 'f""'- 11)"
v~l/)
-0
0.
IV~
:t:: I::.
g..2mLO
Oc..~~
~ E
Gl "
<l. III
"
o
u
III
"
o
l!! ~
Ql "
<l. 0.
-
'c
::JNN
-
o
~ III
Q)-I.O(l')CXJ
..Q"E ~ CV) ~
E::J
"
Z
U-U-
UJ:;;:
'" '"
c: "
'" '"
u "
<J> <J>
-= :J ~
.....1-1--;
e rn C\J_
Ui55~
c::
W
f-
~
W
f-
tI)
~
"
o
'ii)
'5
is
U)
'"
g
5
.S!
:0
"
<l.
>-
C
:l
o
U
~
'0
u
W
c.
2
m
.5
00
w
00
-0
c:
'"
E
'"
o
W
"
'"
Cil
i':'
~
c:
'"
Cil
"
" ~
".8
g M
J!1U-
"""
c.rn
o '"
<l.ll.
'"
a.
o
'"
c.
cot-
~o
'" .
v
III
S
IV "!
0: E '" '"
" 0. oJ M ~
~
0 Ol <ON ~
""
0.
E
"
III '=!~ ~
"
0 <0 ''';
U '0 V t-~
0. ~ CO....
"" Ol r-: '" .
IV -0
" N "'CD
<l. ~ "'~
E t-t- V
Q. N'1.ri ...:
III Ol N
Ql
-
IV
a::
"
,2
e.
E 0 00
"
III '0 '" ",0
c: 0. N, N"l
0 Cl ~ 'en
U '" 00",
'0
0.
Cl
IV-
- "
'Q. 0 "''''
IV-
Ue. NN
~ E ~~
" :l
<l. III
"
0
U
III -
c: '"
0 ::J
l!! N N
~
Ql "
<l. 0.
-
0
~ J!!
" '" '" <0
.0 'c N '" It)
E ::J ~ ~
:l
Z
u-
:;;:
rn m
" c:
'" '"
Cl "
00 U)
0; " "
f- f- iij
i!! $ $ '0
- '> '>
tI) f-
Packet Page -332-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
E E
0.0.
OlOl
",co
td~
'" ~
~ ~
"
" '0
'0 "
" ..
'" E
E " ~
QlQ "
Q ~ "
~ Ql "
Ql l: ~
-
IV "
;:tI) w
'"
Ql C:- '0
"
- IV .
.0- 2
'" .-
- "
0 IV .
<l.tI) $:
"""" '"
'" IV .
"
" " .~
<l.<l.
~ '0'0 e
Gl " n.
<( - - M
:;; .. .. 9
E E
:;; ..:;:; a
::J III III .;.,
tI) ww '"
~
, Olde 0press DR! / PUD Unit Summary
Last Updated: 3/15/2010
Subdivision ~ Total Lots Built to Date %
Strada Bella SF 18 17 94%
Santorini SF 55 55 100%
Terramat SF 55 55 100%
<t; Egret Cove SF 18 18 100%
ex:>
E Ibis Landing SF 55 55 100%
Q)
+-' Santa Rosa SF 27 27 100%
..-
..- Biscayne Place SF 8 8 100%
0
N W oodsedge SF 130 125 96%
--
N
..- Total SF Units 366 360 98%
--
'<t
Subdivision ~ Total Units Built to Date %
Fairway Preserve MF 264 264 100%
Amberton MF 312 132 42%
Total MF Units 576 396 69%
PUDZ-PL2010-1054 REV:1
Vita Tuscana (fka HD Development)
DATE: 6/11/10
DUE: 7/12/10
Olde Cypress DR!
Total Proposed Units
Total Units Built to Date
1100 756
Olde Cypress PUD
MF Units
SF Units
Unallocated
Total Units
Existing
576
366
158
1100
Vita Tuscana PUD
MF Units
SF Units
Total Units
Existing
33
71
104
Total DR! Units
OIde Cypress PUD
Vita Tuscana PUD
Total Units
Existing
1100
o
1100
Packet Page -334-
Proposed
33
125
158
Proposed
942
158
1100
.%
69%
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Oide (ypress DR! Transportation Summary
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Chris Mitchell
From: PodczerwinskyJohn [JohnPodczerwinsky@colliergov.netj
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:54 PM
To; Chris Mitchell
Cc: Keith Gelder; Chris Johnson; GreeneMichael
Subject: RE: Olde Cypress PUDA, HD Development PUDA & Olde Cypress NOPC
Chris,
Agreed. There's no methodology meeting required.
John M. Podczerwinsky
Development Review Project Manager,
Transportation Planning
---_.~~_.~-------~-----
~-------
From: Chris Mitchell [mailto:chrism@waldropengineering.comj
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 7:17 AM
To: PodczelWinskyJohn
ee: Keith Gelder; Chris Johnson
Subject: Olde Cypress PUDA, HD Development PUDA & Olde Cypress NOpe
John,
We had pre-application meetings for the Projects listed above on March 24th of this year. We discussed the
impact for traffic and determined that the conversion rate discussed with RPC staff would be sufficient for the DRI,
PUD to PUD rezone and the PUDA for the park at Olde Cypress would not require any transportation analysis.
Please accept this as written request to waive the methodology meeting and the required fee. Please respond via
email so I can include for submission to Collier County CDES.
Please iet me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A.
Christopher R. Mitchell, PE
Director of Engineering
Phone: 239.405.7777
Fax: 239.405.7899
Under Florida law. e-mall addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do
not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
5/5/2010
Packet Page -336-
~
co
E
Q)
:!::::
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
"'"
CON'; $34.70
4/12/2011 Item 8A
. .
.
.
~
:J
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL ACTION
FIFTH THIRD BANK,
a foreign profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 09-01570-CA
EMPIRE DEVELOPERS GROUP,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company,
EMPIRE BUILDERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
INC., a Florida corporation, AMY L. MfOLSON,
RICHARD B. MELSON, WILLIAM L. SLAVICH
KENNETH D. GOODMAN, KLfOMCO I '. ~1tIT~,.>
LLC alk/a KLfOMCO, LLC, a Florida' . ~ .. ~/\i1'
company, and GULFCOAST HY DING, ;;..
INC., a Florida corporation,
Defendants.
~~1 '"
=
.. " ""
r .."
/-
. ..,
i -..
,'. c-..:I
I C c..)
, ("
'T1 '.
.~?,: co
0 ;::-. ..
c: ..
5:, -" 3
-,
1\5 UJ
~,)
, 5. 0
-<
m
The undersigned,
executed and filed a Certificate of S 111
described herein and that no objections to E
filing objections.
The following property in Collier County, Florida:
Parcel A:
The East 165 feet of the East Ya of the East Ya of the Southwest Yo of the
Southwest Y., Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida, less the South 100 feet thereof for road and canal right-of-
way.
and
The West 165 feet of the East Yz of the East Yz of the Southwest Y. of the
Southwest Y. of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida, less and except the South 100 feet thereof for road and
canal right-of-way.
and
Packet Page -338-
Prol~W' ?R4fi2Q
<C
co
E
(])
:!:::
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<T
AND
.
.
The West Yo of the East Yo of the Southwest % of the Southwest Y.; of
Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less
and except the South 100 feet thereof for road and canal right-of-way.
and
The West Yo of the East Yo of the Southwest Y. of the Southwest Y.: of
Section 21, Township 46 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less
and except the south 110 feet .
Parcel B:
The West Yo of the Southeast % of the Southwest Y. of Section 21, Township
48 South, Range 26 East, less the south 100 feet thereof, lying and being in
Collier County, Floridaj
Together with
The West Yo of the
ction 21, Township
Less and excepting a par
% comer of section 21, towns
00005'10" west for a distance of 100.
Thence run north 89059'30" west for a distance of 111.02 feet;
Thence run north 57041'53" east for a distance of 15.82 feetj
Thence run north 43"11'04" east for a distance of 39.61 feetj
Thence run north 69"14'31" eastfor a distance of 37.47 feet;
Thence run north 51013'31" east for a distance of 49.97 feetj
Thence run north 48050'11" east for a distance of 62.74 feetj
Thence run north 41017'38" eastfor a distance of33.11 feet;
Thence run north 55019'31" east for a distance of 36.02 feetj
Thence run north 59040'49" east for a distance of 24.42 feet;
Thence run north 81002'13" east for a distance of 30.89 feet;
Thence run north 85019'57" eastfor a distance of 31.15 feet;
Thence run north 80056'51" eastfor a distance of 45.57 feet;
Thence run north 79018'39" east for a distance of 61.22 feet;
Thence run north 66015'46" east for a distance of 43.56 feet;
Thence run south 00004'57" east for a distance of 224.51 feet;
Thence run north 89"58'07" west for a distance of 330.17 feet
To the point of beginning.
0.._1....... ..,OAC"'Jn
4/12/2011 Item 8A
. . . .
.
.
Together with the following mitigation parcels:
The Southeast Yo of the Southwest Yo of the Northwest Yo of Section 11,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, subject to a 30
foot easement, over, under, and along the South 30 feet of said property for
all usual purposes of ingress and egress and the placement and servicing
of utilities;
And
The East Y. of the Northwest V. of the Southeast Yo of the Northeast V. of
Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida
(Parcell) subject to a 30 foot right-of-way easement along the North line of
said property for all the usual purposes of ingress and egress as to Parcel
I;
And
The North Y, of the Nort
Section 11, Township
(Parcel II) subject to 3
East lines of said pr pe
as to Parcel II.
3L( 108'
. -.
- ",,' /
0"
."...."'.
Conformed Copies:
All Parties of Record
Prolaw: 284529
Packet Page -340-
-<
co
E
<1)
:!:::
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
Olde Cypress Master Property Owners Association
r-
Welcome sdama_~
MliJn Menu
'.tW:!.t
. Photo Gellerv
. Recommend Us
.~
Private
Reglsten!d Users Only
. NemToDICS
'NewSArch~
'InformUion
. BOllrdMinutes
. Board Notices
'!loardElection
. Buclaetlnro
. Committees
. forms
. Genel'ill
.~
. MilitterDocument5
. Stoe\( Dellelooment
. LettP.tStctneBollrrl
'WebLln~
. !fm!!!
'nfo
. 50ardof Dlrec:tors
'HOAConblctlist
. CommunltvSlte Plan
l..
r-
r.I"d"d: '
"VhlJet.e .
~~..~~:
).<,,>-..;
.;f~~1J1i7JilEt'15-:S
~".",,'if)'jn,;~.~:t\"-:-'f;.,<,
0;'- ;><",
Page 1 of1
""\
Apt" 16, 2010
calendar
ARr!!..1Q.!.2
666
.1S.~7iilQ
0000000
llll.u.1!ll~l1
0000000
R.12~21n~.H
0000000
~~ll~.:aJD.
OOOOOC
Weather
Naples, FL
78 of
Mostly CloudV
<<04'33]:1~
cJjckfGrF"r..~ut
..J
-,
L
All 101105 iIInd trademarks In this site are property of their resper:tlve owner. The comments are property of their poster'S, all the rest <<) 2002 bv TheCvberhood.com
Site Oesigned and Hosted by TheCvbl'rhood com.. dlvlslD~ or Mllgratedl spedlllltinll in desllln and hosting fur HOA Webslte~ and CondO WebsltK
..J
'"/4""
.,-,,;<''' ..- ~
~'it "I ~~~~~'
~~5~~~~~~ff~"i~~~~r~- - .,~
Home . News TODIc:s . Freauentlv Asked Ouestjl'ln~ . Your Account
HOA Contact List
(I1!Port changes to websltll AQm1n)
Order of calls to report problems within your HOA:
1. HOA Property Manager
2. HOA President
3. HOA Neighborhood Representative
HOA President Neighborhood Property Manager
Re....resentative
8iscayne Jim Jim Steve
Place Costello Costello Deangelis
HOA (516) 742-1983 (516) 742-1983 293-1227
limes. :':ilotmmor(li!ll1$tal'll .rom om .rosteJl;:"':~ nsta ~~...tom di!lmana"emeni';;~mci!lst.ne
DaVlncJ Jeffrey M. Richard Bruce
HOA Folkman Kernan Sickles
597-3176 596-2792 272-7158
mfolkm '';~milll m "'Jclr.kIlmll;"'::lI~ol.com l<aol'':;ab~~~t.nI~t
Egret Bill Denise None
Cove Snyder Sapia
HOA 594~9084 (716) 550-0256
w :";'~";'~ol.wm bA;mer56-";-i1ol.eom
Oide Adrienne Adrienne Glen
Cypress Deluca Deluca Fulker
HOA 254-8157 254-8157 774-0723
aadelu;a';"eClmcast.n..t i!Ii1delu~';"~CiI~,n!!t fulke"';"~ MfI.tom
Santa Rob Brian Dean
Rosa McWilliams Murphy Haines
HOA 592-1947 594-2841 262-5051
evetsekefQlao1.c m mu~":'brian;;:a.h:o.,""m dhall'l:~m m.tom
Santonnl John Susan Steve
HOA Dinino Jensen DeAngelis
524-8669 524-0028 293-1227
ohn@'o~~rdInilndaI.COm ll'en.;nl!lllns h .!'T. amana l?mel1t;;; om~!tt,ne
Strada Kelly Steve Steve
Bella Paffel Smith DeAngelis
HOA 593-1912 596-2999 293-1227
kl?1I . affelIlllSW~:~10k. om ssmj;':~I";;;:;:'~"om dllman D m nt';;;~omt:.ilst
Terra Ga'Y Ga'Y Herb
Mar Lusher Lusher Solomon
HOA GarvlusherliilcoffiCilst.net Garvlushercau.:omcast.l'Iet 571-7968
kmaeom an"';"~omcast.net
Main Gate Securi
Securi Guard Cell Phone
Voice Messa in S stem
Tele hone Numbers
592-5381
592-9258
MA Pro e Mana er Contact Telephone
SDA Management Steve DeAngelis 591~8407 (office)
293-1227 (cell)
591-8144 (fax]
sdamannem ntt1iJcomC8st.ne; (emall)
Fire and Police Emergency: 911
Fire Department Fire Prevention Office (leaking fire hydrants): 597-9227
http://ocmasterpoacomimodules.php?name=Info _Pages&pa=displaypage&id=2
4/16/2010
www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Home
Contact Us
E~Filing Services
Document Searches
Forms
Help
Previous on List
Next on List Return To List
IEntity Name Search
Submit I
No Events
No Name History
Detail by Entity Name
Florida Limited Liability Company
VITA PIMA, LLC
Filing Information
Document Number L 10000009737
FEIIEIN Number NONE
Date Filed 01/26/2010
State F L
Status ACTIVE
Principal Address
2647 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE, UNIT 1201
NAPLES FL 34119
Mailing Address
2647 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE, UNIT 1201
NAPLES FL 34119
Registered Agent Name & Address
COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, PA
4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, STE. 300
NAPLES FL 34103-3556 US
Manager/Member Detail
Name & Address
Title MGR
STOCK, BRIAN K
2647 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE, UNIT 1201
NAPLES FL 34119
Annual Reports
No Annual Reports Flied
Document Images
01/26/2010 Florida Limited Liabilitv
View image in PDF format
Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict.
Previous on List
Next on List Return To List
I.g_rJ!_i~yN':im~ S~~.rc~
SUbrnitl
No Events
No Name History
I Home! Contact us 1 Document StC:an::he.s I r;-Filinq Servi,.es I I'om,s I Help i
Co;;vriqht and Privacy Polici"s
Copyright @ 2007 State of Flurida, Department of State.
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?actioJ Packet Page -342-)c _number=L1 0000009737 &inq... 4/16/2010
CO~T County
- ~ -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400' FAX (239) 252-6358
AFFIDAVIT
We/I, VITA PIMA. LLC being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/I am/are the owners of the
<C property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the
CO answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches,
E dato, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest
Q)
..... and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the information requested on
.,- this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer
c; generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will 1i'6t be advertised until this
~ application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted
N
.,-
--
'<:t As property owner We/I further authorize WALDROP ENGINERRING. P.A. to act as our/my
representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
""l
Signature of roperty Owner
Signature of Property Owner
BRIAN STOCK. MANAGER
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
The foregoing in~trument was acknowledged before me this J3/ifL day of
20p-O-... by lVli./;/'I.J ~U who is p"r<Q=lIy known to me or ha produced
as identification.
State of Florida
County of Collier
(Signato of Notary Public - State of
Florid
Jc:uiJI+k f1 (\GIJ0l;
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
,....~~it~.~~;".. JUDITH M. SEALE
i~m'" "'",,\ Notary Public. State of Florida
~.: :'S My Carom. Expires Sep 28. 2012
~,;;... ~~:: Commission If DO 819893
,/i:OJ: fl..<J\., B TN' aI N .-
Re ised weV2tl09 onded hrouoh allan otary ~sn.
4/12/2011/tem8A
Co~r CoUl1ty
~ ~ ~
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
The uodersigned do hereby swear or affmn d,at we are the fee simple titleholders and owners ofrecord of property
commonly known as VITA PIMA, LLC
2647 PROFESSIONAL CIRCLE. SUITE 1201. NAPLES. FL 341 19
(Street address and City, State aod Zip Code)
and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for RESIDENTIAL planned unit development (R.PUD)
zoning. We hereby designate COLEMAN, YOV ANOVICH, & KOESTER, PA, legal representative thereof, as the
legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property
in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and
authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning
approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property
until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the folIO\ving and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project:
1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all cooditions placed
on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in cOImection with the planned unit development
rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and
stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in
part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the pro-visions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or
safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constinne a violation of the Land Development
Code.
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent ovroers that all development activity \vithin
the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the tenus,
safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance.
The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development
and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms,
conditions and safe rds of the planned unit development.
~
'-
Owner
BRiAN STOCK. MANAGER
Printed Name
Printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Sworn to (or affirnled) and subscribed before me this
who is personally knov.n to me or has produced
~
"'~~~~"~~~'" JUDITH M. SEALE
l~mlf ('c~\ Notary Public - Slate of Florida
;;".. ..~ My Comm. Expires Sep 26, 2012
~~: ;.py Comm!ssion # DO 819893
Revisd No~~f,)ft.",," Bonded Through Na!ional Notary Assn_
Packet Page -344-
<x:;
co
E
<l>
....
..--
..--
o
N
--
N
..--
--
'<t
EXIllBIT "A"
FOR COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
PUDZ-PL2010-1054 REV:2
Vita Tuscana RPUD (fka HD Development
RPUD)
DATE: 6/30/10
DUE: 9/26/10
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
VITA TUSCANA RPUD
Property Description:
The east 165 feet of the east Y:, of the east Y:, of the southwest Y. of the southwest y., section 21,
township 48 south, range 26 east, collier county, florida, less the south 100 feet thereof for road
and canal right-of-way.
And
The west 165 feet of the east Y:, of the east Y:, of the southwest Y. of the southwest y., section 21,
township 48 south, range 26 east, Collier County, Florida, less the south 100 feet thereof for road
and canal right-of-way
And
The west Y:, of the east Y:, of the southwest Y. of the southwest Y. of section 21, township 48
south, range 26 east, Collier County, Florida, less and except the south 100 feet thereof for road
and canal right-of way.
And
The west Y2 of the southeast Y. of the southwest Y. of section 21, township 48 south, range 26
east, less the south 100 feet thereof, lying and being in Collier County, Florida;
Together with
The west Y:, of the west Y:, of the southwest Y. of the southeast II. of section 21, township 48
south, range 26 east, lying and being in Collier County, Florida; subject to a canal easement over
the south 100 feet thereof;
Together with
The east Y:, of the southeast Y. of the southwest Y. of section 21, township 48 south, range 26 east,
Collier County, Florida;
Less and excepting a parcel herein described as commencing at the south Y. corner of section 21 ,
township 48 south, range 26 east, thence run north 00005' I 0" west for a distance of 100.00 feet
to the point of beginning.
Thence run north 89059'30" west for a distance of 111.02 feet;
J:\195..oJ Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DRl NOPC\Vila Tuscana PUDZ\First Comment Response\Vita Tuscana Legal Description for CUC.doc
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Thence run north 57041 '53" east for a distance of 15.82 feet;
Thence run north 43011'04" east for a distance of39.61 feet;
Thence run north 69014'3 I" east for a distance of37.47 feet;
Thence run north 51013'31" east for a distance of 49.97 feet;
Thence run north 48050'11" east for a distance of 62.74 feet;
Thence run north 41017'38" east for a distance of 33.11 feet;
Thence run north 55019'31" east for a distance of36.02 feet;
Thence run north 59040'49" east for a distance of 24.42 feet;
Thence run north 81002'13" eastfor a distance of 30.89 feet;
Thence run north 85019'57" east for a distance of31.15 feet;
Thence run north 80056'51" east for a distance of 45.57 feet;
Thence run north 79018'39" east for a distance of 61.22 feet;
Thence run north 66015'46" east for a distance of 43.56 feet;
Thence run south 00004'57" east for a distance of 224.51 feet;
Thence run north 89058'07" west for a distance of 330.17 feet;
To the point of beginning.
Also being further described as follows:
A parcel or tract of land situated in the state of Florida, County of Collier, lying in section 21,
t01'.TIship 48 south, range 26 east and being further bounded and described as follows:
Commencing at southwest corner of the southwest quarter of section 21, township 48 south,
range 26 east, thence n.00059'51 "w. along the west line of the southwest quarter of said section
for 1 00.00 feet to the northerly right-of line of a 100 feet wide drainage canal as described in
deed book 43, page 251 of the public records of Collier County, Florida; thence n.89008'23 "e.
along said northerly right-of way for 330.14 feet to the southeast corner of tract 13 ofOlde
Cypress, unit one, a subdivision recorded in plat book 32 at pages 1 through 11, inclusive, of the
public records of Collier County, Florida; thence continue n.89008'23"e. along said northerly
right-of-way line for 330.14 feet to an intersection with the west line of the west half of the east
half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section 21 and to the point of
beginning; thence n.00059'15"w. along the west line of said fraction for 1230.24 feet to the
northwest corner of said fraction and to the southerly line of the aforesaid Olde Cypress, unit one
subdivision; thence n.89007'34"e. along the southerly line of said subdivision for 1981.51 feet;
thence n.89008'07"e. along the southerly line of said subdivision for 330.24 feet to the northeast
corner of the west half of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said
section 21; thence s.00057'12"e. along the east line of said fraction and along said subdivision
line for 1006.32 feet to the northerly line of a parcel ofland described in official records book
3579 at page 3894 of said public records; thence along the northerly line of said parcel the
following thirteen (13) courses: (1) thence s.65023'20"w. for 43.57 feet; (2) thence s.78026'13"w.
for 61.22 feet; (3) thence s.80004'25"w. for 45.57 feet; (4) thence s.84027'31 "w. for 31.15 feet;
(5) thence s.80009'47"w. for 30.89 feet; (6) thence s.58048'23"w. for 24.42 feet; (7) thence
s.54027'05"w. for 36.02 feet; (8) thence s.40025'12"w. for 33.11 feet; (9) thence s.47057'45"w.
for 62.74 feet; (10) thence s.50021'05"w. for 49.97 feet; (1 I) thence s.68022'05"w. for 37.47 feet;
(12) thence s.42018'38"w. for 39.61 feet; (13) thence s.56049'27"w. for 15.80 feet to the
aforesaid northerly right-of-way line of a 100 feet wide drainage canal; thence s.89008'23"w.
along said northerly right-of-way line for 1869.86 feet to the point of beginning.
1:\195-01 Vila Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DFU NOPC\Vita Tuscana PUDZ\First Comment ResponseWita Tuscana Legal Description for CUC.cioc
Packet Page -346-
~
co
E
Q)
.....
..-
..-
o
N
---
N
..-
---
""
r
Co~ gounty
- - -
4/12/2011 Item 8A
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
- ~ DEPT. OEZONliIIG & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET .
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 543-6958
Jt~~~;'fi
, - .~-I -
,,>':" "-.':,
'/';'~~~-:'"'_::":"_~:- ,-t,~".:t::::;'t~:i":::-f-:;--;,- : ,\:;::;;,).>: 1,;_':":"'-' ,}"~. ":_:"'_
. · .rpR::E~AP;P;Ii:ICA:ljONMEETING'NorES
X\~i~~.,~e~~~~ (pij!~Z) AG-4PUb
.' ;, '..0 P'UDto put> Rezone (PUDZ-A)
o PUD Amendment (PUDA)
J.oPUD
PL#
Date: ~h.'f\ to Time: '6',30 Firm: 'RIch Y 'it Chr~~ tl.!Jd.d I
Project Name: _1-\ \) DC2..\JrJQPn\aA~ t Size of Project Site: acres
Applicant Name:
Phone:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Owner Address: .
Cify
Sfate
ZIP
Existing PUD Name and Number _~l) 1w I J.R.iop)Y\Ql.~+
Assigned Planner <<au DD<;R-leYv1
I
Meeting Allendees: (aflach Sign-In sheet)
os-~c)
l +-- '.t' -\-0
p
I
y-t- ~O\.J ?VJ) 5/'''''';''1 ~"s.11v I-Dlv()c)p~-J ~~
. c:!!J."1f'tlA.,< ~a" ro P 'VI' 0
~ 1U.o&~c,'rro,.v -::P",,^,,"'r~ - I.uCLt.[D6 TE-If' ~ru.-r'o'O COIVVd?-">IOnJ
lA<l7Le' mA-r "S- ~2.D VI})?!> -;::o~ OC-;J;>e c'j,?rz..e>s. ,:Pl2-\ /1'v):> CLl4^-'~5-.
'11evlEle A- c..~ 'Pun MO""'T~IN~ 1:...~ CL(~ -by- L1"-'C}.
*~ -1>\O;;-~,~ml;'~L ('./L'(](11-o()~~afQ~~fO'J.E'(\ fJ\fkG~~(l'C:;S .
~ UD ~ -h:) CAn
~Q..--h-h~ r'~ 'IrIol& ClY\.€.-- "-1/1'-1 .h...r ~ ~D 'PUDt 0 [de... ('ll\>{~gb
~ U D? fo \~0s . PO~'/[M~~cke~ P~g~ -~~8-Aly ^_~(D'L. ~~Iw~a ....
Meeti";g NQles
Collr County
- '-~--- ~
,
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
:Pot) RezO,I\iE(~UDZ) c',.,
'PU.D 1.6P1:lD REZ6NJ: (PUDZ-A)
-- ,..,.\'up4.filENDMllNT(PUP4.)
~P.r!,!~"'n~iI/ su!i_l'!llrr~l~Hg~t1ST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW
....,
W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITT ALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED,
# OF REQUIRED NOT
COPIES REQUIRED
,
.:{
co
E~_......""",.--,,,,,,",
<1> 1_~~~",t'""'..".~.- l'~d:ll"'..
:!::: 1 Addilioncll set if localed in Ihe Sayshore/Gateway Triangle
.,- RedeveloDment Area)
o 1 Additional set for School Boord Review (if conlains residential components) _ /' :l.
~..... Cppies of detoiled description of why amendment is necessary t../{ ~4
N .... ~0>moleted Application (download from webslle for current form) o.:.f'<1;4
.,-
~ .....lA"fe-applicalion meeting notes I .J.IP"
~ eJJD Document & Conceptuol Site Pion 24" x 36" and One 8 V," x 11" copy L
...... Revised Conceotuol Site Pion 24" x 36"and One 8 W' x 11" cooy v
Original PUD document and Master Pion 24" x 36"
ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined . 2
- Revised pUD document wi omended Title oaae w lord #'s, LDC 10.02,1 3,A,2 /' 2
..-Deeds/Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original pUD is omended) V 3"*,
.....-11st identifying Owner & 011 por/ies of corporation V 2 ..::t;,
~ -'6~ner / Affidavit signed & notarized V I 2 '*'
__ --Covenonlof Unified ColiirCiI' ".. ~ '/ 2 ~
.....~mpletedAddressingchecklist lnolYlort...J.L (~IItO 1">1,.\\ V /2 *
v Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) '" or exemption justification J / 2
'- '15igitaifelectronic copy of EIS ;7 .:?l~ "'-
H!J:t6rical Surveyor waiver request 4
v "'lltility Provisions: Statement "/d~etcl::le-s V 4
A~itectural rendering of proposed structures 1-
V Survey, signed & seoled (t\l) more...I11 - (" .\,,'\ ...ll\ ............ -"..4
L Traffic Impact Stotement (TIS) or woiver (with applicoble fees) ~ 1i'lI;/.fb I ....,,'\1.
/- "Lopy--of Traffic Impoct Statement (TIS) on CDROM '-__~ '.)1
\.... ,.Keriol photogrophs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scoled 1 "-200'),. ~
showing FLUCCS Codes, Legend, ond oroiect boundory -----/ 5'
.crectronic copy of 011 documents in Word formot ond plans (CDRom or DiskettSl /~ *
Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within thr: / fa ""24-
aoplication material; DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) "I. V"
\ Copies of Offidallnterpretations and/or Zoning Verifications 10 I ~ ~ 'ifF
"'-.., -'
o-ru.. ~ CoA; ~ +0 "l>("r\o..~ '\>~ ~
-\0 -\-nM.s~ ~+; ~
L/
24
2
2
v
,/,
V
V"
V
v'"
v
v
./
, .---.
..........
V"
V
V
V
./'
~~U~'~),..J
I "v
~
'"
CiS
v
v
X
X
-./
V""
V"
V
4-O'AL to LAO
Ad.J. 11-t~ CO?'~ u.i,ll k (e~OI(~J
-:pnor to ~C
,
.
Co1Mr County
~ "-- ---- --
4/12/2011 Item 8A
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE ORNE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
o EDC "Fast Track" must submit approved copy of official
application
o Affordable Housing "Expedited" must submit copy of signed
Certificate of Agreement.
*If prolect includes on Affordable Housing component, you are required to schedule
a meeting before the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee by contacting the
Collier County Housing and Human Services Department at 239-252~2273.
2
n If located in RFMU IRural Frinoe Mixed Use} Receivina Land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. locavero, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.0.(b)i.c.
n If located within V2 mile of Citv of Naoles send COD V of submittal Dackoa~ to:
Robin Singer, Planning Director
City of Noples
295 Riverside Circle, Naples, FL 34102
Fees:
Application Fee:
D $10,000 (PUD Rezone) + $25 per ocre (or fraction of thereof)
EtJ $8,000 (PUD to PUD) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
D $6,000 (PUD Amendment) + $25 per acre [or fraction of on ocre)
~r
o
o
$150.00 Fire Code Review I $100 for PUDZ-A
$2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review e. ,
$500.00 Pre-application fee
(Applications submiHed 9 months or mare after the date of fhe last pre-app meeting shall not be
credifed towards applicafion fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required.
$925.00 legal Advertising Fee for CCPC meeting
$500.00 legal Advertising Fee far BCC meeting
(advertising costs are to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily News).
~
D
o
$2500,00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee
$1000.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required)
Property Owner Notification fees. Property Owner Notifications
$1.50 Nan-certified; $3.00 Cerfified refurn receipf mail
(to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning & Development Review)
I
Refer to Exhibit A): fL .;;,.
$500.00 Methodology Review Fee, require Coll)-nl,c-r ~'f +'FF IF WA I lit:: I
'Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting
"'t€,~E;'t
Fee Total $
PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW:
h d PI h d d t
Comments s ould be forwar ed to the anner DrlOr to t e ue ae
SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS & REC - Sid Kittila
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS City of Naples - Robin Singer
DR/EM1 - EMER. MGMT - Jim Von Rinteln IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT
CDES Coordinator - Route Sheet Only Utilities Engineering - Zamira Deltoro ,.,
" :
Packet Page -350-
<(
00
E
Q)
+-'
..-
..-
o
~
N
..-
--
V
eotl-r County
~ ~ -
,
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE ORNE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
~.",',"'","~l~V!;1l1li!l~m;:""""',~-!I!l'liWld'I!",,"~!J!!I'~'"II"'a"-~'~-I~'ilS' "ii'~iI~' "<~I"'iI'M~fiii"'""" ..Ko;'s'~r!i;!F'~I.R:fQ''''';;;ii~~''''ifi'F;2';:''J':).'::!:';~;'r';1\:j':'i:'~';"ii'"":,,,"c~~,
"''4f,;.'~, "bL<.;('[.f'''' rl!,l';d; ,''''' ,;~..;..,.., ''''.~~~. i ~:. _', . ~'J~J!!,"" :lIi'i !Q , I' ~;""Ii.1io'U:!li;.;'" ;w':l' "'.it".1 "f.[;;.-':" ':"'" ,,_,.:;',",~~'h n"'..""...,),." ,.,'j._.r.f.~..OJ,,'~ '
<4"", :',_."'_':';;.i:;;;"'!;'''~,tli,"'"'::'': ...,i ~"':!!,-,~'.T,":._~_tt:":'d",,,,j,. _._ ,",' ':""',<';, 'f."~."'",,, .,-., _,..c: ,!...;"....,_:~; . -,", ,.",...,. .C., _", ,..,.,,,J., c,,,,,",,",,, ..::..._;., .,_:,:;,.,......,",N,R,.:.. .'-,ct. ' ,-, '.'....,.',,;,,,,. -,co,.._,.,."".";",,,-,__" M m' -"";"'-.':,c"":C..'"c,,,'.:,_::...,-;,J _:::"""";:',, .,.;;ii1r.J:
Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meefing (NIM) after initial staff review and
commenf on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission.
Written notice of the meeting shall be senf to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification
from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.B.8. .
Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are
impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified.
A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the
Zoning Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days prior to the
scheduled dote of the NIM.
The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably
convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient
size to accommodate expected attendance.
The applicanf must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices
and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meefing and legible site location
map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one-
fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in
the County at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM.
The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the NIM and shall serve as the facilitator of
the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentotlon of how it intends to develop the subject
property.
The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the
Zoning Department.
As a result of mandated meetings with the public, ony commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to
writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning Department. These written
commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a
part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval.
COMMrtMENTS
'li.;-',
Within 30 days of odoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at its expense shall
record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Deveioper Commitments or
Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the
land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in
the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the
recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided
to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring stoff within 15 days of recording of said
Memorandum or Notice.
.t
4/12/2011 Item 8A
,
COLLIER COUNTY ZONING DEPARTMENT
REQUEST FOR MEETINGS
REASON FOR MEETING (check one)
o Pre-Application Meeting
o Telephone Consultation for SOP, SIP Insubstantial Changes
o Telephone Consultation for ICP Insubstantial Change
o One-Dn-One Sufficiency Review Meeting
"'indicates required field
YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION
NAME:' CHRIS MITCHELL REPRESENTING:' WALDROP ENGINEERING
PHONE: 239-405-7777 EMAIL: CHRISM@WALDROPENGINEERING.COM
TYPE OF APPLICATION:' PUDA
PROPERTY INFORMATION
FOLIO NUMBER:' 00186000005
ZONING OR PUD NAME (you must supply original PUD name):" VITA TUSCANA PUDA
STREET ADDRESS OR LOCATION:' TREELINE
SOP/SIP# (required for Insubstantial change): _
CITY: NAPLES ZIP: FL
DETAILEODESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED WORK:'
PUD TO PUD REZONE TO REZONE THE 18.65 ACRES & ADD DENSITY INTO THE OLOE
CYPRESS DRI
Additional Information
For Pre-Application Meeting, please bring the following items:
. Signed and Verified Addressing checklist (allow 3 days for processing)
. $500 Pre-Application Meeting Fee
. $75 Fire Review Pre-App Fee
For Application Submittal Review:
. Submittal Checklist must be attached to the application package
. All items in the package must be submitted in the exact order of the checklist
. Cover page must be attached to each group of items
We will contact you with the scheduled time and person you will be meeting with.
Packet Page -352-
<C
00
E
Q)
.....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
N
.,-
--
'<t
"
!
NOTES
, .
.~
.S
-
i:li) ~
.~ ~
" ,'~,.,!
.:- ~
j 00
~ ~
'~ z
~ ~
'''1 ~
d)
.~
~
o:r
<Xl
o:r
N
I
(")
0
o:r
I
0- ......\:
(") o J
N
W .,
~ 2: ?
<!)
..a <t
E z
:l
Z
<!)
<:
0
.!:
0..
::
<!)
0>
<!)
0::
-
c
<!)
E
a.
o
Qi
>
1II
a
"tl
c
tl
--'
~
tl)
c
c
o
N
....
o
-
c
<!)
E
-
.. u
tl <:
a. tl
<!) <:
a
tl
2:
I
W
-
<!)
c
>
o
(
~
,
r $ "
<-
Or ::
o- J
VI - '"
.,
VI ~ ~ '"
1.&1. ~ "
i:i::;, 0
Q ~
a '"~
<t fI
--'
:;,c cJ
IS
::E
I ~
W
'"
.'" -0
~
\; ":..)
...s:
4/12/2011 Item 8A
0::
w
to
2:
:;)
z
w
2(
o
::r:
0.
V7
~:::r
C" ,0
in \j)
"01\ '-9
, I
11 0
D<:l
I"(
CJ)
CJ)
<!)
..
"tl
"tl
<t
".
0
~ ?;
.; f::!
'"
~ ,;
i':
N
12
!!?
<D
U
Q)
'"
";;:
i':
u
0
'0
cO
0
~
.c
u
'"
U
c
'"
(')
[;'
co:
'"
Z
,
0 f-
W
.V W
-,. I
0 (/)
--:s ;;';
z
(')
Uj
-;;;
c
Q)
E
'"
u
0
0
~
a>
c
a>
"
LL
I-
0.
W
a
---
z
02:
V;~
~u:
a ..
>- 0
I-
Z
:::i
o
U
<:(
co
E
CD
+-'
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
"'"
PUDZ-P 4/12/2011 Item 8A
Vita Tuscana (fka HD Development)
DATE: 6111/10
DUE: 7112/10
REZONING CRITERIA
COMPLIANT WITH LDC SECTION 10.03.05 I.
VITA TUSCANA RPUD
10.03.05 1. Nature of requirements of planning commission report. When pertaining to the
rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the planning commission to the board of
county commissioners required in 10.02.12 D. shall show that the planning commission has
studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, when applicable: '
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan.
The proposed request to rezone the property from Residential Planned Unit Development
(RP UD) and Agricultural (A G) to a unified RP UD is consistent with the provisions of the
GMP as setforth in the PUD Rezone.
The subject property is located within the Urban Res~dential Subdistrict per the Collier
County Future Land Use Map. Per the Growth Management Plan, this Subdistrict is
intended for higher density residential developments in areas with existing or planned
public infrastructure and limited environmental constraints. As described in the Density
Rating System of the GMP, the base density for the subject property is four (4) dwelling
units per acre.
The Applicant is seeking a maximum density of 2.4 du/acre, which is below the maximum
permitted base density associated with the subdistrict. The proposed residential
development program is also consistent with the intent of the Urban Residential
Subdistrict and provides for expansion of an existing RPUD in an area with public
services to accommodate Ihe development and limited environmental constraints.
In addition to consistency with the Urban Residential Subdistrict, the proposed RPUD is
consistent with the following policies of the GMP:
Policy 5.3: Limit Urban Sprawl
The proposed RPUD represents an infill project in a location with surrounding residential
and commercial development, as well as available public services. In compliance with this
policy, the subject property is located in the Urban District on the Future Land Use Map
and is intended for development at urban densities and intensities.
Policy 5.4: Compatibility with Surrounding Uses
The Olde Cypress DRIlPUD abuts the subject property to the north, east and west. This
community is developed with residential, commercial and accessory uses. The Vita
Tuscana RPUD proposes residential uses that will be compatible with the surrounding
uses and therefore meets the intent of this policy.
Packet Page -356-
-=<
co
E
(])
~
~
~
o
N
--
N
~
--
'<t
Policy 5.5: Urban Designations
The subject property is designated within the Urban District per the Future Land Use
Map. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is consistent with this policy and makes
appropriate use of existing urban designations prior to requesting premature conversion
of rural lands for residential development.
Policy 5.6: Development Clustering
The proposed RPUD provides 60% total open space within the development, thereby
representing a clustered development pattern with maximization of green space on-site.
2.
The existing land use pattern.
The subject property is located in an area. of existing residential and commercial
development to the north, east and west. Additionally, lmmokalee Road, a six-lane
divided roadway, abuts the property to the south. Therefore, the residential and
accessory uses proposed within the Vita Tuscana RPUD are consistent with the
surrounding land use patterns.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts.
The subject property is zoned AG and RPUD. This application proposes to include the
agriculturally zoned property into a unified RPUD, which is consistent with the
surrounding land uses to the west, north and east (Olde Cypress DRI/PUD). Therefore,
the proposed rezoning will eliminate an existing, isolated agricultural zoning district and
allow for infill development to occur along lmmokalee Road, a major transportation
corridor.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
A portion of the Vita Tuscana RPUD is currently zoned for agricultural uses. The intent
of the PUD rezoning is to incorporate the agricultural lands into an existing RPUD. Due
to the development of the Olde Cypress community and commercial uses to the east, as
well as improvements to lmmokalee Road, this property is no longer appropriate for
agricultural uses. Therefore, the existing agricultural district boundary is no longer a
logical designation for the property.
Additionally, the subject property has been extensively altered and does not contain
environmentally significant features that would diminish the Applicant's ability to
develop the property as a residential community.
Therefore, the proposed RP UD is an appropriate use of the property based on the based
on the existing levels of surrounding development, frontage along lmmokalee Road,
physical conditions on-site, and designation within the Urban Residential Subdistrict.
1:\195.01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DRI NOPC\Vita Tuscana PUD\Vita TUScanR Rezoning Criteria. doc
4/12/2011 Item 8A
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
Several changes have occurred which make the passage of the proposed RPUD rezoning
both appropriate and necessary.
In terms of development patterns, the subject property is adjacent to existing residential
and commercial development to the north, east and west. Therefore, the agriculturally
zoned portion of the subject property is inconsistent with the surrounding development
pattern. The proposed RPUD rezoning is required to create a consistent land use pattern
along the Immokalee Road corridor.
Additionally, Immokalee Road has been improved to a six-lane divided roadway which
serves as a major transportation corridor in northern Collier County. The proposed
rezoning will make appropriate use of the County's investments in public infrastructure.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions based on the
proposed uses and development standards, including screening, buffering and setbacks.
As noted above, adjacent properties to the north, east and west are developed as part of
the Olde Cypress DRIIPUD. The proposed RPUD will be compatible with the residential
and commercial uses associated with this DR! and will not negatively impact
surrounding, established neighborhoods.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion
or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because
of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
Based on the conversion of units from the Olde Cypress DR! to Vita Tuscana there will
be no excessive traffic congestion, nor will the types of traffic be incompatible with the
surrounding uses. The units within Vita Tuscana RP UD have already been accounted for
in traffic analyses, as the overall Olde Cypress DR! units will not increase.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed RPUD development program can be readily accommodated by the
proposed water management system. The review of the proposed storm water
management system by the South Florida Water Management District will further insure
that water management can be readily accommodated
J:\l95~OI Vita Tuscana\WordlPUDAs & DRINOPC\Vita TuscanaI Packet Page -3~8- :eria.doc
10.
<C
co
E
Q)
.....
.,-
.,-
0
N
--
N II.
.,-
--
'<t
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
With the proposed development standards and limitations on height and setbacks
depicted on the PUD Master Plan, the proposed change will not seriously reduce light
and/or air to adjacent areas. .
Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area.
The Vita Tuscana RPUD will not adversely affect property values in the general area
based on the proposed uses, development regulations and sensitive site design. The
proposed RPUD serves as injill development in an area surrounded by existing
residential and commercial uses, The proposed residential development will be an
enhancement to the area. Furthermore, the proposed uses, buffer yards and design
treatments will be compatible with those of surrounding developments.
Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
As stated above, surrounding properties are currently developed with residential and
commercial uses. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is considered infill development and
will not deter any further improvements to adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed change in use will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change in use will
be consistent with the provisions of the Urban Residential Subdistrict and other policies
outlined in the GMP, as noted in Item 1 above.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning.
A portion of the proposed Vita Tuscana RPUD is currently zoned for agricultural uses.
Due to the development of the Olde Cypress community and commercial uses to the east,
this property is no longer appropriate for agricultural uses. The proposed residential use
of the property is the highest and best use based on the existing levels of surrounding
development, frontage along Immokalee Road and designation within the Urban
Residential Subdistrict.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the county.
The proposed RPUD will allow for up to 125 single-family units and 33 multi-family
units on 65"= acres. This equates to an overall gross density of 2.4 dwelling units per
J:\195-01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DR! NOPc\Vita Tuscana PUD\Vita Tuscana Rezoning Criteria.doc
4/12/2011 Item 8A
acre. Based on the density range outlined for the Urban Residential Subdistrict in the
GMP, the proposed RPUD is not out of scale with the intended use of the property.
Furthermore, the proposed residential uses are consistent with the approved densities for
surrounding residential communities and are not out of character with the existing
neighborhood
15. Whether it is impossible to fmd other adequate sites in the county for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
The proposed Vita Tuscana RPUD represents an injill development in the Urban District
of the County. Additionally, there is existing public irifrastructure at appropriate Levels
of Service to accommodate the proposed density of 2.4 du/acre. The majority of the
property included in the rezoning request is currently permitted for residential uses per
the HD Development RPUD.
Due to the injill nature of the proposed development and the land use consistency
generated through its approval, the subject property is an appropriate location for the
residential development.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for auy of the range of potential uses
uuder the proposed zoning classification.
The basis for this request is due to the prior extensive clearing and alteration of the site.
A FLUCCS map and aerial are included in the Application and demonstrate that the site
is appropriate for the development of a residential community through the RPUD
rezoning process due to the limited environmental constraints on-site. Additionally, due
to the nature of the RP UD zoning district, only those uses specifically requested through
this application will be allowable within the development.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth
management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended.
Adequate public facilities and services are available at the subject property and can
service the proposed developments at the adopted Levels of Service outlined in the GMP.
The proposed Vita Tuscana RPUD is being incorporated into the approved Olde Cypress
DRI per a forthcoming Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) application submitted to the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC). There are no expected
impacts to existing public facilities and services, as Ihe overall DRI units will not be
increased Rather they will be re-allocated to reflect current and build-out conditions for
the DR!, including both Olde Cypress and Vita Tuscana.
1:\195-01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DRl NOPC\Vita Tuscana F Packet Page -360- eria.doc
-<
co
E
Q)
~
..-
..-
o
N
---
N
..-
---
'<t
The Applicant has prepared an analysis for the conversion of trips to reflect the
additional single family homes versus the estimated number provided in the original
Trciffic Impact Statement. The applicant has used the trip generation assumptions
provided in the pre-application meeting with the SWFRPC. Per this meeting it was
suggested the Applicant utilize the following for purposes of calculation: 0.5 for MF and
1.0 for SF. The calculation is attached and will not negatively impact Levels of Service
along surrounding roadways.
18.
Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners
shall deem important in the protection ofthe public health, safety, and welfare.
Such other factors will be consistent with the time of rezoning approval by the Board of
County Commissioners as deemed necessary for future protection of the public safety,
health and welfare.
J:\195~Ol Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DRI NOPC\vita Tuscana PUO\Vita Tuscana RezorungCriteria.doc
4/12/2011 Item 8A
ADDENDUM
EVALUATION CRITERIA
VITA TUSCANA RPUD
PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS lLDC SECTION lO.02.13.B)
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Narrative Statement:
The sw-rounding area is zoned RPUD, "Residential Planned Unit Development" with
residential development adjacent to the boundaries of the subject property to the north,
west and commercial PUD to the east. This application incorporates the remaining land
locked property, zoned agricultural, between the Olde Cypress PUD (Ordinance # 2000-
37) and the HD Development RPUD (Ordinance #05-65) into the Vita Tuscana RPUD
(agricultural lands and current HD Development PUD). The characteristics of the land
are consistent with with surrounding land uses and the proposed residential development
program is compatible with all adjacent uses.
There are no concerns regarding existing infrastructure serving this project as lmmakolee
Road is six laned and provides indirect access via Treeline Drive and Olde Cypress Drive.
Additionally, there is existing power, telephone and cable available at the project
boundary to service the project.
Water infrastructure is available at the projecct boundary and is provided by Collier
County. The proposed wastewater system will connect to Collier County owned
infrastructure located in the lmmakolee Road ROW. Collier County will provide both
water and wastewater service.
Drainage facilities and other infrastructure can readily accommodate the proposed
rezoning request and subsequent development of the property.
The area is, therefore, suitable for the proposed rezoning request from RP UD and A G to
RP UD based on the characteristics of the land and compliance with other criteria set forth
below.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not toe be provided or maintained at
public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after
consultation with the County Attorney.
J:\195-01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DR! NOPC\Vita Tuscana PUD\Vita Tuscana Evaluation Criteria. doc
Packet Page -362-
<<
co
E
Q)
.....
T""
T""
o
N
--
N
T""
--
V
Narrative Statement:
The subject property is under Unified Control for the purpose of filing this rezoning
request and as further evidenced by the Statement of Unified Control included in the
Rezoning Application.
3.
Conformity ofthe proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth
management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other
provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all
criteria or conditions ofthat subdistrict, policy or other provision.)
Narrative Statement.'
The proposed request to rezone the property from Residential Planned Unit Development
(RPUD) and Agricultural (.4G) to a unified RPUD is consistent with the provisions of the
GMP as setforth in the PUD Rezone.
The subject property is located within the Urban Residential Subdistrict per the Collier
County Future Land Use Map. Per the Growth Management Plan, this subdistrict is
intended for higher density residential developments in areas with existing or planned
public infrastructure and limited environmental constraints. As outlined in the Density
Rating System, the base density for the subject property is four (4) dwelling units per acre.
The Applicant is seeking a maximum density of 2.4 du/acre, which is below the maximum
permitted base density associated with the subdistrict. The proposed residential
development program is also consistent with the intent of the Urban Residential
Subdistrict and provides for expansion of an existing RPUD in an area with public
services to accommodate the development and limited environmental constraints.
In addition to consistency with the Urban Residential Subdistrict, the proposed RPUD is
consistent with the following policies of the GMP:
Policy 5.3: Limit Urban Sprawl
The proposed RPUD represents an infill development in a location with surrounding
development and available public services. The subject property is located in the Urban
District on the Future Land Use Map and intendedfor development at urban densities and
intensities.
Policy 5.4: Compatibility with Surrounding Uses
The Olde Cypress DRIlPUD abuts the subject property to the north, east and west. This
community is developed with residential, commercial and accessory uses. The Vita
Tuscana RPUD proposes residential uses that will be compatible with the surrounding
uses.
Policy 5.5: Urban Designations
J:II95-01 Vita TuscanalWordlPUDAs & DR! NOPCIVita Tuscana PUDlVita Tuscana Evaluation Criteria doc
Page 2 of 4
4/12/2011 Item 8A
The subject property is designated within the Urban District per the Future Land Use
Map. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is consistent with this policy and makes
appropriate use of existing urban designations.
Policy 5.6: Development Clustering
The proposed RPUD provides 60% total open space within the development, thereby
representing a clustered development pattern with maximization of green space on-site.
4. The internaI and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed RPUD will contain single and multi-family residential uses as previously
approved through Ordinance #05-65. The rezone incorporates the agricultural lands into
the approved RP UD for fUture residential development. The boundary condition for the
northern property line will qe extended on the new portion afthe RPUD. There are no
other restrictions or buffering supplements. The parcel is surrounded by residential
development and will remain as residential development within the RPUD. The buffers
will be consistent with the previously approved buffers and will meet the intent of the Land
Development Code in terms of screening adjacent properties and ensuring compatibility.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Narrative Statement:
The original HD Development established the existing native vegetation / open space
location and requirements for the project. The new RPUD will meet the requirements for
native vegetation (25% of viable native vegetation) and open space (60% total) and it will
be consistent with the previously approved RPUD (See PUD Master Plan).
6. The timing or sequence of developmeut for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Narrative Statement:
After the entitlement of the property, it is anticipated that the 125 +/- units will be
developed over a 5 to 7 year period. Both private and public utility infrastructure are
available at the subject property at an appropriate capacity to service the project.
In addition, the surrounding roadway infrastructure is in existence and the re-allocation
of units from Olde Cypress RPUD to Vita Tuscana RPUD through the aggregation
process will have a net affect of "no impact" to the surrounding transportation network,
as those units have already been accounted for, they will just be transferred from the Olde
1:\195-01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DR! NOPc\Vita Tuscana PUD\Vita Tuscana Evaluation Criteria.doc
Packet Page -364-
<C
co
E
OJ
~
..- 8.
..-
0
N
--
N
..-
--
"<t
Cypress PUD to the Vita Tuscana RPUD. Compliance with these criteria can be met
based on the foregoing.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Narrative Statement:
There is no concern regarding residential expansion in this area. The subject property
can accommodate the proposed units and the surrounding areas have been developed
with appropriate infrastructure to support the proposed single family residential
development.
Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of
justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
Narrative Statement:
The proposed' development can be found to be generally consistent with the PUD
regulations contained in the LDC and a determination can be made that the subject
development proposes to a degree or at least equivalent to a literal application of such
regulations.
One deviation is proposed from LDC requirements pertaining to internal rights of way
(ROW) widths, as shown on Exhibit "En attached The Applicant is requesting a
reduction in ROW widths from the required 60' to 50'. This deviation will allow for
increased flexibility in terms of design and function of internal roadways servicing the
project. Moreover, the reduced ROW width allows for maximization of open space areas
throughout the development.
1:\195-01 Vita Tuscana\Word\PUDAs & DRl NOPClVita TuscanaPUDIVita Tuscana Evaluation Criteria. doc
Page 4 of4
4/12/2011 Item 8A
AFFIDA VIT OF COMPLIANCE
r hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41. of the Collier County Land Development
Code, ] did give notice by mail to the following propeliy owners and or condominium and civic
associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an
application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to
the scheduled Neighborhood Infonn3tion Meeting. For Ihe purposcs of Ihis rcquircmcl1l, rhe
names and addresses IIfpmpcrty owners shall he deemed those appearing on the lalesltax mils
q( Collier County and any olher perSOJ1S or Cllfflies ll1w hm'e made (l formal request of the
county 10 he IWllfied. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of
proposed change and the date, time. and place of a Neighborhood Infomlation Meeting.
Per attached letters and or prope11y owner's list. which are hereby made a part of this
Affidavit of Co mpha nee
'/ .1,)\
/\l'i/~J)J JJiY~;~--
'{.s-ib'11aturehf Applicant)
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this.-i3' '~ay of
(7"] I ~!? , I }.r: I.
I /: 1);'{1,Z/,1 : 2010 by /'"),'j /1 -J -..;J" :1'~_(",l. , \\/110 is personallY
kD.2.1Y1.1lQ]1l~. or who has produced as identification.
/j tf~l__-; 1_, Ii' J,lt,)
(Signature of Notary Public)
'j 'J At", --
'" :' ,_",c,:-\~ I 'T n /Vj :I. /': _:::
Printed Name of Notary
~,
,<~'..:.~",'2;'", JU8IT~ M ";, - :
:-':'(:~:'~'-~ ~~r,:c.ry PUDlic- S',';::, ~_ ~:~ri,ja
:'k b"lJ= r/y C1:T1m, :xOlle~ ~~p ,-'3, ?J1;:
\~7;;~;~~~~/ 8.)n~~~T~/:~~~~;2~ :~~ .~~~;,~9A~5n.
Packet Page -366-
<<
co
E
Q)
.....
..-
..-
o
~
N
..-
--
"'"
September 30, 2010
<<First)) <<Spouse)) <<Last>>
<<Owner>>
<<Address 1>> <<Address2>>
<<City>>, <<State>> <<Zip>>
Dear Property Owner:
Please be advised that two (2) formal applications have been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of the
following zoning changes:
PUDZ-PL2010-1054 - VITA PIMA, LLC, represented by Chris Mitchell of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. and
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., is requesting to rezone the 46.64;'
acre HD Residential Development Planned Unit Development (RPUD) and an adjacent 18.65;' acre Agriculturally
(A) zoned tract to a new project that will be known as the Vita Tuscana RPUD. As proposed, the request is to
develop up to 125 single-family residential units and 33 multi-family units. The location and amount of the
proposed multi-family units under the existing entitlements will remain unchanged from its present location.
PUDA-PL2010-388 - aide Cypress Development, L TD, represented by Chris Mitchell of Waldrop Engineering,
P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., is requesting a PUD
Amendment for the aIde Cypress PUD. The PUD Amendment request is to reduce the project density from 1100
dwelling units to 942 dwelling units and remove the requirements of trails and a park (3.9 acres minimWll) within
the Olde Cypress PUD/DRl. The subject property is located in the aIde Cypress subdivision, Sections 2 I and 22,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
The petitioner is asking the County to approve these independent applications to allow development of Vita
Tuscana as described above.
In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) will
be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an
opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on
October 18th, 2010 at 5:30 pm at the aide Cypress Clubhouse located at 7165 Treeline Drive, Naples, FL 34119.
At this meeting, our development team will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and
to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Keith Gelder, Development Manager
Stock Development, LLC
Olde Cypress Development, L TD
VITA PIMA, LLC
(239) 592-7344 Office
kgelder@J,stockdevelooment.com
cc: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Collier County
Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner, Collier County
FeI", NomoI N""" O"",or Add""",1 AJ"'-'l Cily 51410 7jn
'1M COSTELLO BISeA YNE PLACE HOMEOWMF.RS ASSOCIA1 7409 TREELINE DRIVE NAPLES "- HI19
JEFFREY mlXMAN DA V1NCl HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATlON 2995 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES "- 14119
Bill SNYDER EGRET COVE OF NAPLES HOMEOWNER'S M JOll O!.DE COVE WAY NAPLES "- J41\9
AD"",,", DELUCA OLOE CYPRESS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOClATI{ 5067 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAA'" "- 3411J
'OB MCIl.T....lJAMS SANTA ROSA AT OWE CYPRESS HOMEOW?- 73&4 MONTEVERDE WAY NAAU," "- J4119
'""" DOONO SANTORlNl V1l.LAS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCL 3 135 SANTOR!NI COURT NAPLES "- 34119
KELLY '''"''''' STRADA BELLA HOMEOWNERS ASSOClA TIC 3064 S1'RADABEU.ACT NAPLF.5 "- 34119
OARY LUSHER TERRAMAR AT OLOE CYPRESS HOMEOWNE 9844 LUNACIRCLEDI03 NAA'" "- 34109
D""'-'N TIroMA' OWE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY OWNEll7 501 TIlliEUNEO' NAPLES "- 34\19
m", DEANGELIS OWE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY OWNER 3 13S SAmORlNI COURT NAPLES n. )4119
"OB PlJOACH SA TIlRNlA u.KES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA 1 !l10 SATIJRNlAGRANPEDRl NAPLES "- 34119
"0"" KOZEL LONGSHORE LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCI I 139~ PHOENIX WAY NAA'" "- 34119
AArnuR Moolm FAtRWA Y PRESRRVE AT OLOE CYPRESS (0"1995 PRESER\lECIRCLE NAPLES n. 34119
ALEJANDRO DElFINO AMBERTON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. 1044 CASTEll.OOR1VE.STEl NAPLES "- 34103
JOHN SHELTON HERITAGE GREENS COMMUNITY ASSOClAT 2fill$ HORSESHOE DRIVE SOU NAPLES "- 341001
64625000188 Ol.DECYP!lESSOEVLTO 7199 TREELINE DR ""'''' n. 34119
646lS000382 OLDE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY noo TREELINE DR ""'''' "- 34119
64626001021 DONNA OLDMAN TI< 7401 TREELINE DR NAPLES ,,- ]4119
6462S0004.21 BDWAAD &. AOR1ENNE R -" 7402 TIlliEUNED' NAPLES "- 34119
646l6OO1047 ROMABRfNC 1405 TREElJNEDR NAPlES "- HII~
64625000447 ffiNKm JOHN MORGAN R"" 7408 TREEl..INEDR NAPLES "- 34119
64616001063 "AMES &PATlUCIAE COSTELLO "" TREELINE DR NAPLES "- )41\9
646260010119 GEORGE MAZOR 7413 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- 34119
64625000463 """,ND BEAAYTR 741. TREEUNE DR NAPLES ,'- 34119
64626001102 FLORlOA SAY I' ARTNF..RS [NC 7417 TREELtNEOR NAJ'lLS "- 34119
6462$000489 ROBERT LEMPATR 7420 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- 141J9
6462S00Cl502 OBNS & DIANNE MA YBERR Y 74201 rREELlNEDR NAPLES "- 301119
64625000528 W"-U^" OVEREND TR 742~ TREELINE: OR "^"m "- )4[19
646lSOOQg29 ANTHONY HELLO 7429 TREEUNEDR NAPLES "- 34119
6462SOOO544 u.KB & MARIE S WALTON 74)2 TRf:EL1NEDR NAPLES "- 14119
646250008(13 IlllESLEY &. BRENDA LEE "'-A' 7433 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- 34119
601615000550 ROGER & EVELYN ''''-AAD 7436 rREEWNEOR NAPLES "- 34119
646250:KJ71lO eRANK ^'^"'''', 7431 TREEUNE DR NAPLES "- 34119
646lS00Cl586 RICINT PROPERTIES I..LC "1440 TREEUNEPR NN'LES "- 14119
64625000760\ l.ourS &LorSA URENNER SR 7441 TREELINE-DR NAPl..ES ". 34119
6462S00ll609 COWIN . MARCENn l.YONS 7444 TREELINE DR N^",-" "- 34119
M6lS00014B DENNIS &Cl.AIREE NARDONr 744S TIlliEUNEDR ""'" "- 34119
601615000625 ROBF..RT & ANNA D MURPHY 144H TIlliEUNED' NAPLES "- 34119
64(025000722 BDWAAD '.mO U49 TRfE.tNEDR NAPlES "- 34119
6462S00ll6.41 SUlAN GALLUCCI 7452 TREELINE DR N_'\PLES "- ]4119
64625000706 >RID REIMER 7451 TREruNE DR NAPLES "- 34119
646:ZSOO3046 '^" &SHARONM 7,UCCARO 7456 TREELlNEDR NAA'" "- 34119
6462S00J0fi2 MICHAEl. lOHNST0NTR 7460 TREE:1.JNEDR NAPLES "- ]41)9
646Z50030R8 JAICllUN & BOCK SOON KIM 7464 TREEUNE DR NAl'LES "- 34119
646lS00J90' ANDIffiW & AGNES D'JAMOOS 7465 TREWNE DR NAPLES "- 34119
6462S003101 RBC BANK 746~ TREEUNE DR NAPLE.~ "- HI19
6462S003884 '-">em &'-'U'H' Y..LAAS 7.169 rREELtNEDR NAPLES "- 34119
64~2S00JI27 JAMl'S & BETSY A E\'AN5 7472 mEELlNE DR N"'''' " 3411~
64625003868 MARLENE MELlTR 747, TREELINE DR NAPLES ". HI19
64625003143 LAWRENCE MCFADDEN 1476 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- HI\9
646lS003169 ''''-Y MU>R /4HO TREELINE DR NAPLf.S "- 34119
646250031gS "-'U'H &OIANAL EDWARDS 7484 TREELlNEOR NAPLES " .14119
M6Z5003842 JOHN PANKUCH 74~5 lRl:.-aJNE DR NAPLES ;C HII'!
64625003208 , "ME" CHAi'.'DRASEKARAN TR 74~B TREELINE DR NAPLES " 34119
64625003&26 JAMES DEVLIN '4"1 TREELINE DR NAPLES " 14119
&462500.12201 GREGORY & TAMMY L SMITH 7492 TREEUNEDR NAPLES " .1~ 119
646lS003800 "^"" &.BARBARAJ PELTASON 7495 TREEl.lNEDR NAPLES H. ..4119
6462.5003240 'ON &AUOB MACDONOUGH j~% TREELINE OR NAPLES "- J4119
6462.5003787 ''''''''''' &'ANlJREAA KANSY 7499 lREEtlNEOR NAPLES "- ]4119
&4625003266 'mBDA IlANSENTR ~5()Q 1llliELINEoR N,Al'LES "- }4119
64625003161 DUNCAN &JANJNEI CONNELL 75()J ,REELfNEDR NAPLES "- 3~ 119
64625003282 '",",N & RORlNK SCHlus,R 7S()4 TREELINE OR NAPLES "- )4119
6462S0037~5 "^'" & rAMELA J SClruLTZ '501 rREEL1NEDR NAPLES "- 34119
6462'003305 ROHERT & SY'~V1A LEAVY "508 1lUiEUNEOR NN'LES "- .14119
646lS003729 CAROLYN UITI< 7511 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- 3~ 119
6462500]]21 eB'" WND 7512 TREELfNEDR NAPLES " 34119
646:zsoon47 HOWARD &OAILL VENGER 7$16 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- :loll 19
64625001703 .'>>ARD &.DIANNE PIGNATAl<o 7519 TREELlNEDR NAPLES "- .14119
64621003363 LOUIS BORCHERS 7520 TREELlNEOR NAPLeS "- 341)9
60162,003680 seOTI &. KATHERrNE TONARELLl 7521 "l"REEL1NEDR NAPl.ES " 34119
646lS00J389 STEVEN &.GAlL SACKNOfF 7524 TREELINE OR NAI'LF:S "- 34119
6462SOO3664 m"", &CYKTh1AA cox 7<" 1lZE!'.LINEDR NAPLES "- 141 !~
6462,003402 JONATHAN JAY 7528 TREELlNEDR NAPLES "- .14119
64625003648 STEPI-lEN RAlI.OLSKYTR "Ill TREELINE DR NAPtr:.S " 14]19
M625003(lS ^,AN I'H.TZ 75]2 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- .14119
64625ooJ622 BERNARD & LUCIA BARONE ,SJ5 TREEUNEDR NAPLES "- .14\19
64625003444 cAR'" lr.:SANPRA MCKINNEYTRS ~:iJ6 TREELINE DR t\AI'lES ,c 34119
646251"103606 RONAL!) &.1UDYS CHANCE ~,19 ,'REEUNEDR NAPlES "- 34119
64625003460 LEWIS &. JEANNE M DERVIN 7:>40 ~REELINEOR NAPLES " 14119
6462SOO3583 ROBERT &KATI-lERINE WEIDNER 7-'41 TREEUNE DR NAPLES "- 34119
646lSOOJ486 MICHON & HENRY Fl.OREANI )54~ TREELINE DR NN'LES " 34119
64625OOJ5{,7 EUGENE &'IlEVERLEYJ SUDOL ".7 TREELINE DR NAPLES "- 34119
6462.5003509 ""0 &.nJDYD HERZOG 7S4R TREEUNE DR N/J'I.ES "- J4119
64(2)003541 O"'ID CALANDRA 7551 TREELlNEOR NAJ>I.!':5 " 141)9
(,4(,25003>25 KtMUERLY ~" SCHMIDT 7555 1lZEELlNEDR NAl'I,ES "- 341\9
64625003923 THO,,^, &.DENISEL WOLFGANG 28~2 W1U10RCi-lIDCT NAPLES "- 1~ 119
64625004401 ^,oo & MICHELE SAMWJ<R-:lNO nil.) WIL/)ORCH1DCT NN'LES " 341)9
6461)003949 "A",- &.GWENM N!EI.SF.N 2~06 WILDGRCHIDCT 14APL~~~ ,,- 34119
6<1625004388 LOUIS & PATRICIA D!'.LSIGNORE 2ij07 \>.1LDORCI,IIDCT NAPLES FL 1411~
6462500396, 'DO'" &KAn-il.EEN lOOK 1810 \l,'Ill)ORCHlDCT NAPLES n. J4119
64625004]62 WWID FONnJ:;SSYTR 2~ II WI!.D ORCHID CT NAPLES "C }411~
64625003981 Cf-lRlSTOPHER SCI-lAEFl"F..R 2814 \\'[LOORCH[OCT NAA'" " 3~ 119
601625004346 '"K &rRlSI-lA BORGES l~IS 'IIILDORCHlDl'T NAl'LES " )4119
646Z51lO400J BRJARWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP 2818 WIWORCI-llDCT NAPI.ES "- 34119
64625004320 CHRIST &.MARlLYNJ HIOTlS 2819 WILD ORCHID CT NAPLES R 34119
646lSIlO4304 MARK &NANCYJ RANDAU- 28B WllDORCHlDCT NAPLES "- 14119
64625004029 DISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAL 1H24 W!LDORCHIDCT NAPLES "- 34119
646lS004281 DISTINCTIVE RESIDENTIAl 2H2/ WlLDORCI-llDCT NAPLES "- HI19
646251lO404, Dl5T1NCTlVERESIDENTIAL 2818 WI!.DORCH!DCT N"'''' n 34119
64625004265 DISTrNCTIVE RESIDENTIAL 28.11 \>.~lllORCHlDCT NAPLES "- 14119
64625004061 JOHN & ANGEUTA 0 ~CROl'ro 28]l W1IDORCl-ilDCT NAPLES " J4119
64625004249 ",,0ffiU. &0 SUSANM COHEN TR 2815 WILD ORCHlD CT NAPLES " J~ I I 9
64615M4087 = &UWAN BRYANT 1~36 WILD ORCH!DCT NAPLES "- 34119
64625004Z23 ","O'NT &I'RANCINE ORLANDO 2~H WILD ORCH\O CT NAPLES "- .14119
64~2,O04100 '''^''''' DJ::NEKA TR 2MIl wr~DORCHIDCT NAl'LES "l 34119
Packet Page -368-
4/12/2011/tem 8A
64625004107 GEOffREY Il.LINDAM MOEBIUS ""' WILD ORCHID CT """" 11. .14119
"""""". CARRY OLINDA RAO^" "" WILD ORCHID CT NAPLES 11. 34119
6462S004]1l4 ROBERT II:. SANDRA A SWANSON ,~, WILD ORCHID CT ""'''' 11. 34119
64625004]42 OOTU; BOYD ,~. Wll.DORCHlDCT """" 11. 34119
6462500416& ROBERT II:. TAMERA A HANSON 'ST' WilD ORCHID CT """" 11. ;14]19
...",,""" OLDE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY "'. WILD ORCHID CT """" 11. 34119
72590000321 ""C" O'^"""-' UNKE< 7347 MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
12590000344 'TE2'HEN 'O\.AR.OH ".. MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
12590000302 EDWARD KAUFMAN "51 MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
72590000360 '''''' HAMILTON 7352 MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
11590000219 fBREIDQUN """"""' 7J55 MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
72590000386 PAUL AlEXANDER 'ORmON ,;s, MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 14119
"""'""" HOWARD 4.CAROL RAFALOfP 7J59 MONTEVERDE WAY """'" 11. 341J9
125!/000D0409 RAYMOND & SANDRA L BURGO "'" MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
72590000247 BONNA PRl" DE MARCO TR "" MONTEVERDE WAY "",",S 11. 34119
72S9OOll(),(2S C",," SMOtl.tNGER JR 'J1I. ".. MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. )4119
72590000.22.1 RONALD SHREVES TR "" MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
7259Oll1lO441 NICHOlAS & FRANCES 1lOCCEll.A ".. MONTEVERDE WAY NAPLES 11. 34119
72590000205 >OHN ""ANNW SIlEWMAN 7371 MONTEVEROEWAY NAl'LE:~ 11. 34119
72S90000467 BRlA" ""UNDAM MURPHY 7372 MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
725'.lOOOO182 SALVATORE SAMPERl 737S MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
72590000483 NEIL SCANCAREI.J..A 7316 MONTEVERDE WAY ""'LEI; 11. 34119
<( 725~166 OONN<S 0'''''''' 7)79 MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
72590000140 KE"'" KINO ,,~ MONTEVERDE WI\. Y "^"'" " 34119
7259000050li mANNE MC'NIU.lA.MS 7384 MONTEVERDE WI\. Y """" " 34119
CO 72590000124 ST"''''' & PATRlClA HOPE ROE "" MONTEVERDE WAY NAPLES 11. 34119
7259000052:2 JOSEPH &. DEBRA I R1CHlCHI 738B MONTEVERDE WAY "APLES 11. 34119
E 72590000108 STANLEY &.EVELYN ^"<AEI. 7391 MONTEVERDE WAY NAPLES 11. 34119
7259oooo54B DELORES DURKALSKI TRS ,,~ MONTEVERDE WAY """" 11. 34119
Q) 7259OOOOOll5 ",",Y eOLEl; 7395 MONTEVERDE WAY N"'LEI; 11. 34119
:!::: n5:1OOOOS64 lAN JAMES TOO 7J98 MONTEVERDE WAY "APLES " 34119
72590000069 WllLYoM VOUliRrntlM 7399 MONTEVERDE WAY N""" 11. 341J9
..- 64626001128 ~Cf!ARD & MAUREEN M BRENNEN 2101 OLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLEI; 11. .14119
..- 64626001144 JOSEPH & IVANA "-TER 1705 OWE CVPRESS DR NAPLES 11. 34119
0 64625OOOl145 "iJUNO &OKBAE 'TUNTI< 2706 OLDECYl'RESSDR ""LEI; 11. 34119
64626001160 MARK 01NE5TI< "M OWE CYPRESS DR """-'" 11. .14119
N 646250001161 PREDom &11.05100 MAULDEN 27HJ OLOE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; 11. .14119
-- 64625000817 STEPHEN &MERRll.EEA NEWS 27]4 OLDECYPRESSDR NAPLES R. 34119
N 725'10000043 CAROLYN KillER 2717 OWE CYPRESS DR NAPLES R. 341]9
..- 64625000900 "'"A MITCHELL ma OillE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. 34119
-- 64625001789 SAm A ROSA AT OLOE CYPRESS 2719 OLOE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; 11. 34119
-.::t 6462S001420 mHN 4. CAROL A MOORBE 2721 OLDE CYPRESS OR """" 11. 34119
64625000926 RONAW & DIANE 0 HORSF\ElIJ ,m OWE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. .14119
64625001446 LINWOOD OUWAN K Ba, ,,~ OLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. .14119
64625000942 ",",Y & JEAN ANN LANDREVlLLE 2726 OJ.DECYPRESSDR NAPLES 11. 34119
64625000968 FRAN'" 0ffiNN 1130 OLOE CYPRESS OR ""'LEI; 11. 34119
6462S001462 ""-CO"" YEWDA.ll. TR 2731 OLOE CYPRESS OR ""'LEI; 11. .14119
"""""" CAROLE & RICHARD 0 P",""" 2734 OLOE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; 11. 34119
64625001488 O"'RA CHAMBERS 2737 OWE CYPRESS DR """" 11. 34119
64625001006 GEORGE 'HAUruB 2738 aLOE CYPRESS DR N""LEI; 11. 34119
64625001022 "'CHELE WARD "' 2742 OWE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; 11. 34]19
64625001501 FRANCIS ROSTRON 2743 aLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. 34119
64625001041 "R1W. CHINN TR 2746 OLOECYl'RESSDR ""'LEI; " 34119
1>4615001527 CHRISTER o MARJE KALLSTROM :1747 OWE CYPRESS OR N"'LEI; 11. 34119
64625001064 HUBERT GRANE JR TR 2750 aLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. 34119
64625001543 ROBERT "-""'ND'" 275.1 OLDECYl'RESSDR NAPLES " 341)9
64625001080 'OHN MALASPINA ,,~ OLOE CYPRESS DR """'" 11. 34119
64625001569 YOUNG SOOK &. CHUNG KI K>MYR 2751 OWE CYPRESS DR """" 11. 341]9
64625001103 COSMO &.IRENEM TRAP"" 1758 OillE CYPRESS DR """" 11. .14119
64625001585 ADAPTALL AMERICA ]NC 2761 OWE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; 11. .14119
64625001129 EULABE1H TAVl.ORTR 2')62 OLDE CYPRESS DR """" 11. 34]19
64625001145 ALB"'T o ADRlENNE DELUCA ,,~ OLDECYPRESSDR ""'LEI; R. 34119
646250016011 LYNDA ANDREWS 2767 OLDECYPRESSDR "^"''' " 34119
64625001161 CARRY DOUOlAS TAYLOR 1770 aLOE CYPRESS DR """" 11. 34119
64625001624 JOSEPH KAFKA TI< 2773 OLDECYPRESSDR NAPLES R. 34119
64625001187 ROBERT &M.\RCIAA ""-"ERN 2774 OUJE CYPRESS DR "APLE' 11. 34119
64625001640 THO"" &.JANlCEL 'URKAY "n OLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES. 11. 34119
64625001200 GEQRGE A.ll.IEORO 2778 aLOE CYPRESS DR ""LEI; 11. 34119
64625001666 ..CHARD DORETR 2781 OLOECYPRESSDR NAPLES 11. 34119
6462S001226 C>WU.E5 &. NANCY J eu,,", 2782 OLOE CYPRESS DR ""'''S " 34119
64615001682 ANDREW & VERONICA A STIEN 2785 OlOE CYPRESS DR ""'''' 11. )4119
64625001242 SCOTT &LESLlEN HUNT'" ,,~ OLDE CYPRESS DR """" 11. 34119
64625001705 '''''''' & KATHlEEN A CAANA 2189 aLOE CYPRESS OR """" 11. 34119
64625OO126B mHN CATALANOTR "'0 OLOE CYPRESS DR N""LEI; 11. 34119
646lS1Xll721 ROBERT &.KAYF DENNIS 219) OLDECYPRES5DR N""-'" 11. 34119
64625ool1ll4 LaNN<E &KATIlY] CUSTER 2794 OLDJ:: CYPRESS DR """" " 34119
64625001747 DO" &. BARBARA ZURE1CH TR 2791 O:.DE CYPRESS DR ""'LEI; R. 34119
64625001307 BARR' &. BARBARA J MARTINO 2798 OlOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES R 34119
64625001763 DAVID &.JANlCE STONE 2801 OLOE CYPRESS DR NAPLES 11. 34119
64625006124 HE"'" & SHARON M MCINERNEY 2839 LONE PINE LN NAPLE..'l " 34119
64625005044 """''' IVERSON 2&40 LONE PlNE LN ""'LEI; " ]4119
646l5OO6108 EDWARD &.VJCKIW SCHIFMAN 2843 LONE PINE LN ""'LEI; 11. 34119
64625006085 DENNIS DaUCA ,~, loONEPINELN NAPLES H. .14119
64525005060 ROBERT RUSf'TR 2850 LONE PINE LN """" R 34119
64615006069 EDWARD &. THERESA. M JONES 2851 LONE PiNE LN """" n 34119
64625005016 VINCENT & DONNA M ORAZIUSO n<< LONEP1NELN N"'LEI; " .14119
6462S006043 ROBERT & KATIILEEN A MORIN 2855 LONEPlNELN """" 11. 34119
646l5OOS10!l LEONAlW AMATO 2858 LONEPlNELN """" " 34119
64625006017 lAN,,,,,, & MARY KATHLEEN TOO 2859 LONE PINE LN N"'LEI; " 34119
64625005125 RONALD &E1LEEN FINE>< 2862 LONE PINE LN NAPLES 11. 34119
64625006001 CHRlSTOeHER SCKAEFFER 2863 LONE PINE LN NAPLES " 34119
64625005141 D"""- SMITH ,,~ LONE PINE LN """LEI; 11. ]4119
64625005989 ROBERT &. DIANE M PUMMlU. "" LONE PINE LN """LEI; 11. :\4119
64625005167 "'CH.<EL ROBSON 2870 LONEPlNELN N""'" ,'e )4119
64625005963 ROBERT &.CAROLT WILSEY 2&7.1 LONE PINE LN ""'''' R. 34119
64625005183 LEO" &.JUDITHA "'OTI 1874 LONE PINE l.N NAPLES 11. )4119
64625005947 ROBERT .,,<NET SA.LTAREUJ 2B77 LONE PINE LN ""'LEI; 11. 34119
64625005206 DAVlD BtlSHEll.'J1I. 2878 LONE PlNELN NAPLES 11. 34119
64625005921 FRANK & CAROl.E L TROVATO 2881 LONE PINE LN NAPLES R. 34119
646250052.22 C""""" &.5USANR F10RETRS 2882 LONE PINE LN N"'''' 11. 34119
646l5OO5!1ll5 DAVID moMAS TR 2885 LONEPlNELN """-'" 11. 34119
64625005248 KARL< 'Em 2886 LONE PINE LN """" 11. 34\19
64625005W ROBERT CORWIN 2889 LONE PINE loN ""'LEI; 11. 34119
64625005264 '''''''' CAVANAOHTR "'" LONEPlNE loN NAPLES 11. 34119
64625005866 '''''' &LYNA ""''' "" LONE PINE LN NAPLES 11. 34119
64625005280 DAVID &.M1CflAELE HACKETT ,,~ LONE PINE loN ""'LEI; 11. 34119
64615005840 KENNETH WAGE 1897 LONE PINE LN """" 11. 34119
64625005)0] K>HN &: DIANE K EBERTnI ~8~B lONE I'INE LN NAPLES "- ]4119
~62S00S824 """'" CONNON ,~, LONE P]NE LN NAPLES "- 34119
64625005329 ""'''''' &: FRANCINE OW,NDO "m lONEl'lNELN NAPLES "- 341]9
6462500580& RONALD & MARW< TODISCO ,~, LONEPlNELN NAPLES "- 34119
64625005345 ",cw.EI. NADOLSKI ",. LONE P]NE LN NAPLES "- 34119
64625005785 """'N &:JUD1Tll """'00" m. LONE PINE LN NAPlES "- 34119
64625005769 "'"-"M LElSENTiUIT 2913 LONEP1NELN NAPlES "- 34119
64625OOS743 """'" &. BRENDA L LAMOTTA 29]7 lONEPlNELN NAPLES "- 34119
6462500536] """'" SLAGI-ITTR 291S LONE PINE LN NAPLE.'. "- J4119
64625005727 """" MI\NOASllt 2921 LONE PINE LN NAPLES '" 34]\9
64625005701 """ &. SHARON CAMPIONE ~n5 LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
64625ooSJ&7 MAlU< PIORETR 2928 LONEPtNELN NAPlES "- 34119
646150056l19 MAlU< &. SANDRA THEOBALD ~929 LONE PlNE LN NAPlES "- 34Jt9
64625OOS662 S,,",N MlCHAEl. .U1UR 29J) LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 341]9
6462500S4OO ."""" DEVlNETR ,,% LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
6462500S646 """" TODDlU 2937 LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
04625005426 """ &KArnLEEN CO,", 2940 LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
64625005620 """ CRUZ.GONZALEZ ,~, l.ONE PINE LN NAPLES n 34119
6462S005442 GREGORY KASHMANIAN TR "" LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
646250(lSe>04 MELISSA ROSS SHOWALTER 1R 2945 LONEPINELN NAPlES "- 34119
64625005468 "VI. OMDOIl. TR 2~48 LONEPlNELN NAPLES "- 34119
6462500558] cru.m & AMBER GRIDEll. 2949 LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- 34119
646250054~ JACQUELINE URSa 2952 LONE PINE LN NAPLES "- )4119
64625005507 00'" &BEATAD MOOR 2956 1.0NEPlNELN NAPLES "- 34]19
6462SOO552J wall"" &. RUTH A WAD, '''' WNEPlNELN NAPLES "- 34]19
~25oo5549 IOHN &BEUNDAL '^"" ,~ lONEPINELN NAP'" "- 341]9
6462500~56~ '''''' DUNKEL!lERGER "" LONE PINE LN NAP'" "- 34119
64626000381 MAR< &'CATI-lERINEG CAMAACH 3UlI OLPE t:OVE WAY NAPLES "l. 34119
64626000048 '''''' 'AHL 3024 OLDECOVEWAY "APLES " 34119
64626000365 SHARON CHAMBffiLNN J!l25 OLDECOVEWAY NAPLES n 34]19
64626000064 """V FOSTER 3028 OLPECOVEWAY "AP'" "- 34]19
64626lJOO]49 '0HN k CAROL 0 T ALANlAN 3029 Ol.DE COI/E WAY NAPLES " 34119
64626000080 ROBERT ALBANESE 1032 OLDE COVE WAY NAPLES "- )4119
64626ooo32J "CHAAD &.lJENlSEA SAPIA lDD OLDECO\fEWAY NAPLES 'l. 34119
64626000]03 BRYON &. STEPHANIE GOLDlZEN _,0)(, OLDECOVEWAY NAPLES "- 34]19
64626000307 mOMAS &. ABaEGAlL S FOGARTY JOl; Ol,DE COVE WAY NAP'" "- 3411 ~
64626000129 weE & HElDl A WALTONln ;~o OLDE CO\!E WAY t-;APLES "- 34119
6462600028-( ALBERT &- ROSEMARY l'ERRAA1 31141 Ol.DE COVE WAY NAPLES "- 34119
64626000145 o<m JUUANOTIl.S :11>44 OLDECO\fEWAY NAPLES "- 34119
64626000268 JOSEPH rAVLlK 31>4, Ol.OE COVE WAY NAPL-ES "- 34119
64626000]61 wall^" & CHRISTINE R""'. J048 OLDE C:OVE WAY NAPLES " 14119
64626000242 ",""y &GEORGlNEA WELCH ](J49 OLDE CO\!E WAY NAPLES "- .14119
64626000]87 """^" SNYDERTR 1051 OLDE CO\IE WAY NAPLES "- HI19
64~26000Z26 ""'" KEARNS 3[JS.1 OLDE COVE WA)' NAPLES " 34119
~4626oo0200 THOMAS TREVIS :l(:~7 OLDE COVE WAY NAPLES "- )4119
72590004641 SANTORlNI Vn.LAS HOMEOw:-.IERS J(lf>7 SANTORINICT NAPlES R ~4119
7:.:59000574; m",,^s &-DENISE ANORlS lO'JO SANTOI1JNICT NAYLES n. 341]9
72590004667 CHEmR . KAREN GIBSON J071 ",ANTOi!.]NICT NAPLES " .14]19
72~90005721 D_ & SUSAN I' FlTLGERAUJ W74 SM'TOR1NTCT NAPLES ,l. 34119
n~900046IlJ "VI. &- MARCIA "^= 3075 SA,NTORlNln NAPLES R. 34119
7259000S70~ ROBERT &-SYLVlA LEAVY 1(178 SANTORINI CT "APLES "- _1411~
72590004106 HOWAlID & PEGGY HOU.IS CONNOR .1()19 SANTORINlCT NAP'" " ]4119
72590005682 ROBERT &V1RGlNIAD OLIVER l()~2 SAhTORINlCT NAl'l.ES " 34]19
7259OOOl722 '''''' & JOYCED GADOMSKI lOSJ SANTORlNlCT NAPLES "- 34]19
72590005666 OAAY &SlJSANL JENSEN J1'M SANTORIN] CT "APLES "- 34119
72590004748 MAR< & DlANA A "mn<o .10&7 SANTORlNlCT NAl'LES "- 34119
7259000S64C "'"'" &. ROSEMARlE CANGIANO J(I'l[) SANTORINI CT NAP'" ,'C }4]19
72590004764 ~croR ALVARO wq: SANTORINICT NAPLES "- 34]19
7259000562~ "'" &VICTOItlA GUNDERSON .11'04 SANTORlNI CT NAPLES e. :14119
7I50000~780 mHN '" JOANN B1ENlEK }{'95 SANTOl<lNICT NAP'" K _'4119
7259()(1{)5608 'OHN .1FAlTHS V1TACCOTR W98 SANTORINleT NAP'" " 34119
72590004803 NICHOLAS &.DIANE DANESE .1099 SANTORlNICT NAPLES R 34119
7259000S5&5 mOMAS M1LLERMD llO2 SAl'<TORINICT NAPLES R .14]19
74977000]01 mH &WENt)YM ""''''- 30M STRADA BEllA CT NAPLES "- 34119
74977000127 KLEMCO INVESTMENTS LLC WliS Snl.ADABEUJlCT NAPLES 'l. .14119
74971000444 """" & ERMA' FUNARI JO'l ST1UUJABEtJ.ACT NAPLES ;1- 34119
74'177000143 CA__ SMlTI-lTR 1072 STRADA BEllA CT NAPLES " 34119
74977000169 PATRlCIA DUC:.oS YJ76 SffiADABEUJlCT NAPe" " J4119
74977000]85 ""''''' &. CAROLYN A MURPHY 311110 STRADA BELLA CT NAPLES "- 34 T I ~
7497700020ll ULTIMATENAP1..ES STRADA ,0~4 S-:1<ADABELLACT ~'APLES " 341]9
74977000224 """'" 8: ANNE S KANDlI.l.l~ 31188 STI<ADABElJ.ACT NAPLES "- 34119
74977000240 '0HN WHITTI.C J()92 STRADABEU,ACT NAl'LES "- 34119
74977000266 """-YN BRADLEE l{l% SffiADABEI.l.ACT "APLES 'l. 34119
74977000282 mow..s & SHIRLEY R TATRO :1100 STRADA BEIl.A CT NAPLES R. 34119
74977000305 "VI. &.B"-RBARAA CHRISTY llO( STRADABEUJ.CT NAl'LF.s " J4119
74977000321 """" EU$ 311J~ STRADABEliACT NAPLES " ]4119
74977000J47 DAVID &ANNETTEY "!ME' Jill .';TRADABf:l.J.ACT ""'''' R l41] ~
74977000361 ROBERT CQSGROVEJR '116 STRADABELl.ACT NAPLES "- )41]9
74977000J89 DAMIAN & C"l-lERYL A 11-lOMAS 1120 STRADABElJJ\C'] N,>J'LES FL J4119
7497700(\402 DEN}IlS &CLAlRE OKEEFE :124 STIl.ADABELLACT NAPLES " 34]!9
74977000428 'OHN & CECILE ZEIMETZ .li2S STlv\DABELLACT NAPLES "- 34119
767]]000703 ROBERT &.StlSANA RElNFRIEn 11117 fERRAMARCT NAf'~S '" 34119
767Jl000'l2J IOHN INORAMm :1jlO TERRAMARCT ~AP;'ES R 34119
76713000729 ROBERT &.LlSAM PAQUETTE :1 ] I ~ TERRAMAR 2T NAP~ES " 34119
767IJOO0907 DONALD & C1-lERn A CUPI'STR .1114 TERRAMAR CT NAPLES R l4]19
76713000745 ""'- "'LYNNG CAAR 311S TERRAMAR CT NAPLES "- 14]19
76713ooo8!14 W, & JOYCE rOKART 11 j~ TERRAMAR CT NAPLES "- 34119
76713000761 MAURICE BOUCHARD TIl. 1119 IERRAMAR CT NN'LES n 34119
767LlOOOll68 R<AN< IfMAURF.EN MADALONE Jln IE1UUIMAR CT NAPLES "- 34119
7671)000787 SUSAN MARRINAN' TR 1113 TEl<RAMAR CT NAPLES R 34119
767130001142 "-OYO RODGERS 'JJ(, TERRAMAR CT NAPLES R 341 ]~
7671~0001IDlJ JOSEPH & ANN DCUA ]:17 TERRAMAR CT NAPLES " 341]9
767JJ000ll26 "",",S &. CHERYL Y KOMATZ ,110 :H,RAW\RCT NAPLES "- 34119
7671300]142 eoWAAD & MARY TOMBUl' :1C,O rt'.RRAMAR DR NAPLES R 34119
i67]JOOO()62 '''''' If.SHERONL SI'lEWAX lOSI TE'.RRAMARl)R NAPlES R 341!9
76713001126 mOMAS ,t.JOANF ~AUS 1:154 TERRAW.R DR NAPLES "- 34119
7(,iI3ooo088 JOlIN SULLIVAN J055 T".....RRAMARDR NAPL/;;S "- 34119
767DOOOIOl WALTER MACFARLAND IV J05~ rfRHAMAR DR NAP'" "- 34119
7611l00]100 "'"'" II-OLGA HARMON 301iO :-F..RII.AMARDR NAPLES "- 3411~
76711000117 "CHAAD If. DEI3RA A METZ ;~, TERRAMAR DR NAPLES " l41]9
7671l0010&7 DMID &NUE RADBANl ){JG4 TERRA.MARDR NAPl.ES "- .14:19
7671300014] """"" VIVIAN! 31l<i7 TERRAMAR DR NAPl.ES F'. 3~ 119
7671)001061 we"" SAALOUKEH 31l()S TERRAMAR DR NAPLES "- 34119
767]3000169 MITCHEll. PETUSEVSKY .1071 TERRAMAR DR NAPLf.5 R 34119
'16713001045 "'''''''' STUMPO 30n T'-..:RRAMARDR NAPLES "- 34119
7671lOOOla5 ''''"'' &.MARYJ CE' )m5 rSRll.AMAR DR NAPLES "- 34119
76713001029 o,vm & TRAcEY J UEB"",^" J076 TERKMlARlJR NAPlr,s "- 34119
Packet Page -370-
4/12/2011Item8A
16713001003 OAR' kJUDYA LUSHER "" "><RAMAR DR N,,",OS fl. 34119
16113000911 ORAI!ME 'KATIlBRlNE Me ""'<AN "M lElRAMAR DR N"""" Fe 34119
76113000201 EUOJlNE MCCABE 308~ TERRAMAR DR. N"""" fl. 34119
76113000965 ""UE .""'" SOKOLOFF ",.. lElRAMARDR N""'-'" fl. 34119
16713000224 MK>W!>. &.LINDAS CONRA'Ill ".. lElRAMARDR N"""" fl. 34119
16713000949 "-'RENeE ILMARYl-OUlSE BE'" "" TERRAMAR DR N^,,"" fl. 34119
16713000240 PHIWP ILROSAltND D'ACHIU.E JWJ rn>U<AMAR DR """"" fl. 34119
76713000266 '^'" d<SUSANP PAUoillR 3097 lElRAMAR DR N"""" fl. 34119
76713000282 'AMI> k NANCY L "" 3IDl lElRAMAR DR NAI'COS fl. 34119
761J3000311S CHIYOKO SASAKI llOS TERRAMAR DR """"" fl. l41l9
761130006lI0 JD'" NOWlCKY "'" lElRAMARDR """"" fl. 34119
76713000321 """" &. MARY JO WORTMAN "'" TERRAMAR DR N^,,'" fl. l4119
76713000664 JOYCE MORIUSON 3112 lElRAMAR DR NAI'COS fl. 34119
76713000347 UNOA mmcH 3113 TERRAMAR DR NAI'COS fl. 34119
7611301106411 DAVID MACDOUGALL 3116 TBRRAMAR DR N"""" fl. l4119
76113000363 MAUREEN DEMARTINO 3117 lElRAMAR DR NAPLES Fe 34119
767])000389 KAREN OmSON TR :1121 lElRAMAR DR N""'" fl. 34119
76713000622 HARW' &.CAROLC >AT, 3114 lElRAMAR DR N""'" fl. 34119
767130004(12 DDNAW FOlANlll JI" TERRAMAA DR N"""" fl. 34119
7671J{J()(lfilJfi mD,.,., SlPlLATR 3128 TERRAMAR DR NAI'COS fl. 34119
76713000428 ""'" JAMES TR 3129 ,_ DR NAI'COS fl. 34\19
~ 767lJOOOSK3 "'0HAa """>ESEM VAUGHAN 1132 TERRAMAR DR NAI'COS Fe 34119
767])000444 ",,"rnNE WALl'OLETRS 3133 TERRAMAR DR N"""" Fe 34119
76713000$67 'O_ k CHARLOTTE M BARRY 3136 TERRAMAR DR N"""" Fe 34119
CO 7671100D460 """"N &>nL Dt/CATMAN 31]7 lElRAMAR DR NAPLES fl. 34119
76713000$41 UNWOOD &.JIUK aac JI" lElRAMAR DR N,,",OS fl. 34119
E 76713000486 DAVID &.StlZANNEM YOST 3]41 lElRAMAR DR NAI'COS fl. 34119
16113000525 MAAK U"", 3144 TERRAMAR DR N^,,"" fl. 34119
Q) 7671JOOO5Cl9 'AMI> VITALE TR ll45 TERRAMAR DR NAPLES fl. 34119
29734000302 DA VINCI HOMEOWNERS "'" LEONARDO A \IE NAPLES fl. 34119
=: 2973400150~ ""A AM"" 2902 LEONARDO A \IE NAPLES Fe 34119
29134000166 DA VINCI ESTATES HOMEOWNERS 2903 LEONARDO AVE "AI'COS fl. 34119
.,- 29734000328 ~rnARO KERNAN .IR TR 2905 LEONARDO AVE NAFCOS fl. H]19
.,- 29734001481 GSOROE MELIU.a "'" LEONARDO AVE NAPLES fl. 34\]9
0 29734000344 JOSEPH kalZABETHJ SMITH "" LEONARDO AVE """"" fl. 341]9
N 29734001466 ROBERT OlMUccr 2910 LEONARDO AVE NAPLES H. 34119
29734000027 DA VlNCI ESTATES HOMEOWNERS 2911 LF.oNARDO A VE """'" F>. 34119
-- 29734000360 "'WREN'" aM"" 2913 lRlNAADO AVE NAI'COS fl. 34119
N 297340003116 'DHN lIt.MARYT HUGHES 2917 LEONARDO A VB NAfl.OS Fe 34119
.,- 29734001440 "'D'IT &:.JODY LEVY "'" lliONARnO A \IE NAI'COS fl. ,4119
-- 2~734000409 HB HOLDINGS Of SW FL.LLC 2921 LEONARDO A \IE N,,"," H. 34119
'<:t 29734000425 >OHN . >w<EN STAffORD 2930 FLORENTINE CT NAI'COS Fe 34119
29734000441 SYED &ROBING MAD"' 2934 FLORENTINE CT NAPLF..s Fe 34119
297340(}{)41.l MARO >C YNN APPLEBAUM 29]5 FLORENTINECT NAP"" Fe 34119
29734000467 >OHN &.PAMELAA PUNCAN 2938 FLORENTINE CT NAPLES fl. 34119
29734000S48 ruNE .QffiEK SCOTTTR 2939 MONA USA BLVD NAFCOS fl. 34119
29734000512 """"" SKUL<;KY TR mo MONA USA BL VD NAPLES fl. 34119
29734000S64 D"" BlASERTR. 2943 MGNALlSABLVD NAPLES fl. 34]19
297340ooSOti 'DHN ''''OHEU.E "0""" 2944 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES fl. 34119
29734000580 , SEDLACEK 2947 MONA USA BLVD NAP'" " 34119
2973400Ci603 DE<E' &. WENDY B I'ISHER 2951 MONA USA BLVD N""'" H. 34119
29734000247 DA VINCI ESTATES HOMEOWNERS 2953 MONA LISA BLVD "AP"" H. 34lJ9
29734000629 JOSEPH . RITA RAFFAELE 2955 MONA LISA BLVD N"""" H. 341]9
29734000545 >0_ &.FEUCIAA MANHART 2959 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES fl. 34119
29734000661 NICHOLAS WHITELEY TR "" MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES H. 34]19
29734000681 "'0HAa &:.MAUREEN'E ZINOO ,%, MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES fl. 34119
29134000100 ROBERT &:.l1JDlTHA BOHLTR m> MONA USA BLVD """U;, Fe J4119
29734001424 >RENE BALLANDS 2974 MONALlSABLVD NAPLES fl. 3411Y
29734000726 WAU'" &.CAROLER HALANOER 2975 MONA USA Al VD NAPLES H. 34119
29734001408 WO,UAM WlLLIAMsm 2978 MONA lJSA BLVD N"""" " 34119
29734000742 OW, &:KAntl..EENM FORSMAN 2979 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES F>. 34119
29734001385 JDHN &.LOREITAM LEFFINlll. 2982 MONA LISA BLVD NAP'-'" fl. 34]19
29734ooJ369 """ & KATHLEEN) BOW" "" MONA LISA BLVD N"""" H. 34]19
29734000768 WAU'" HURillMAN 2987 MONA LISA l31. YO NAPLES fl. 34119
29734001J43 "'"' aUNO' "00 MONA USA BL YO N^,,'" H. 34119
29734031327 !'EGGY WHmTI< ,,~ MONA USA BLVD N"""" f1- 34119
29734000784 >mRE'( FOLKMAN "" MONA LISA BLVD N^,,"" fl. )4119
297340013111 """'" 8:.JOANJ CARROLL 2!I'J8 MONA LISA BL YO N"""" Fe J4119
29734001288 'Am DAVIDSON Th '00' MONA LISA BL YO "AI'COS fl. 34119
29134001262 "''' &.TRISHA BORGES ,"00 MONA LISA OIL VD N,,",OS " 34]19
29734001246 IVAN &.BETTYF VtlHARTON 3010 MONA LlSA BLYO NAPLES " 3~\19
297340C10807 JORGE kGISEt. PADRON 3011 MONA LISA aL YO N^,,"" fl. 341]9
29734001220 SUSAN MORGAN 3014 MONA LISA BI.YO N"''''' F>. 3~ 119
29734000813 DONAW &. MARCHEU.E A GOENS 3015 MONA LISA BLVD """COS Fe 34119
297J.4001204 ~OHARD ARMSThONG 30]8 MONA USA BLVD NAPLES fl. 34119
29734OOOll49 PHOENIX HOMES rNC 3019 MONA LISA BL YO NW,,", "1- 34119
29734001181 SUSAN & moMAS L HANSENTRS 3022 MONA LISA BL YO NAI'COS " 34119
29734OOOl165 AW<E &TATlANA OBOllNTSEV 3023 MONA lISA BLVD N"""" " )4119
29734001165 DAVID DICKSON 3026 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES " 34119
29734OOOll81 MICHAEL &. JOY A V>NE< 3027 MONA LISA BLVD N"""" F>. )4119
29734000904 I'<rnR SUlDIET At 303] MONALISABLVO """"" " 34119
29734000920 EWm I"EINBERG 3035 MONA LISA BLVD NAPLES F>. 34119
29134001068 "'0HAa ""'E' PEDONE 3036 MONA LISA BL YO NAPLES H. 34119
29734001042 m & DAN>EW! OTTO 3040 MONALlSABLVD N^,,'" " )4119
29734001026 "'rnARO .BRENDA HUNT ''"' MONA LISA BLVD NN'I..ES fl. 34119
297340009-46 >oHN & PATRICIA B MAZOR ''"' MONA USA BLVD N"""" fl. 341]9
29734001000 'OlAND &.LUZM LORENZO 3lJ.48 MONALISABLVP N"""" f1- 34]19
29734000962 ~OHARD BLOSSERJR ''"' MONA LISA BLVD """"" Fe 341]9
297340009l1. "'0HAa . MARn. rn ETTENBERO 3052 MONA USA BLVD NAPLES fl. 34119
29734001084 RlOHARO SCHJLLlNGJR .1029 RENAlSSANCECT N^"COS fl. 34119
29734oo11~9 HOSSEIN' & INGEBORG OHADIM> 3030 RENAISSANCECT NAPlES fl. 34119
29734001107 RONALD . MAR>E M ROTUNDA 3033 RENAlSSANCECT N""'" Fe 34119
19734oo112J >0" CONDOMlNA 3034 RENAlSSANCECT NAP"" ,1- 34119
3::182100188 MARrON ALBANO 790S PIl.ESERVECIR N"""" fl. 34119
32382100)81 """' AlliXAND'" EARRE><O >00, PRESERVE CIR N"""" fl. 34119
nJ82100201 GEORGE WU'^" EO""'" ",,, PRESERVEClR NAPLES fl. 341]9
32382100269 '''''' FERNANDEZ aD""" "'>> l'RESERVECIR N,,",OS fl. 34119
3238210046] ,"'"' >'ERN",,"", EO"",, 7905 PRESERVECIR N^,,"" H. 34]]9
32382100366 MARO DAVIGNON 7905 PRESE!< VE ClR NAPLES fl. 34119
32382100340 NUEITE DU,," 7905 J'RESERVEClR N"""" Fe 34119
32382100324 FAIRWAY ACOUlSlTIONUC 7905 PRESERVE CIR N"""" fl. )4119
32382100146 >OHN FOR.tE '000 PRESERVEClR NAPLES fl. 34119
323821~9 SANJAY H1NOORANJ 7905 PRESERVEUR NAPLES fl. 34119
32381]00489 "'''''' <ATmF.CK ",,, PRSSER VE ClR NAPLES Fe 34]19
32382100<<7 "'WN &. BARBARA A KELSKY m, PRESERVECIR NAP1.ES " 34119
32382100120 l.ARKSPURPROPERTlESlLC 7905 PRESERVEC\R NAPlES fl. 34119
3238210040S - & BRIAN LINDBLADE '000 PRESERVECIR NAPLES fl. 3~1]9
32382100285 ROBERTA LOHR ,~, PRESERVEClR 'Ae"" " 34119
3:2382J00081 ,~'" _0 ,~, PRESER \IE ClR N""-'" n. 34119
3:23811000:23 ARTHUR 4:.l'ATRIClA MOO"" 7<lllS I'RESERVECIR NAe"" " J41111
32381100227 'HAWN NO><RAY m, PRESERVECnl; N""-'" n. 34119
32382100065 GREGORY MUSUMANO "'" PRESERVEClR N""" n. 34119
3:2382J00243 SALVATORE . MAR'" PASSARELLO M, I'RESERVEClR NAe"" n. )4119
32382100162 FRANClS STEINHAUSER ,~, PRESERVECIR NAPLES " 34119
32382100308 >0""" ,,"PATPJZlA TRUPIANO 7~S PRESERVEC/R N^""" " }41111
32382100421 ,""', UNDERWOOD JR "'" PRESERVECJR NAe"" " 14119
32382100llM ,"OW", WRlOHT '790S PRESERYECIR NAe"" " 341J9
32382100887 """" Vll.LUON ALBORTA 7915 PRESERVEClR NAe"" "- 34119
32)82100829 '''''' AUC 7915 l'RESER VE ClR NAe"" n. 34119
32381100764 AMTIl.USTBANK 7915 PRESa!.VEClR 'Ae"" n. 34119
32382100S60 FEDERAl. NATL MORTGAGE ASSOC 791S PRESllRVECIR NAe"" n. J4119
32381100942 '''''' &.ELtZ.ABEnl FITZSIMONS '7915 PRESERVECIR NAl'LI> n. l<ll19
32381100706 CARLOS GALE....NO 79IS PRESERVEClR NAl'LI> n. HI19
3238210064l '-"LEy NEW<1T '7915 PRE..'lERVECIR NAPLES n. 14119
32382100803 RE8ECC.... KINCER 7915 PRESERVEC/R NAPLES n. )41]9
32382100722 M<C"-'E<. &:.KRIl>T1NA KOLODZIEJ 79]S PRESERVECIR 'Ae"" n. .141111
323B21oo780 lARKSPURPROPERTlES .!915 PRESERVECIR NAPLES n. )41111
32382100845 l..ARKsrURPROPERTIESLLC 71115 PRESERVECIR ,'-''''' "- H119
323821005U2 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7'115 PRESERVJ;CIR 'Ae"" n. 34119
32381100528 LARKSPUR PROPERTrES LLC "1915 PRESER YE C1R 'Ae"" "- H]19
32382100926 ~CHARD &3ENNIFER LlSEKJR 7915 I'RESERVEC1R NAPLES <'L )41)9
nl~2]OOB61 GABRIEU.E MAm '7915 rRESE:RVEC1R ,""', "- 34119
32382100667 eoMUND &W~ l' AODEN TR '915 I'R.ESERVECtR NAPLES "- )4119
32382100544 KArnililiN &:.GRBGORY ,-, '915 PRESERVECIR NAe"" "- 34119
3238.2100586 ANnmNY ,,"AUDREYS puu.os 79]5 I'RESERVEClR NAPLES "- 14]19
32381100683 BLAGA &KlI.STE STO.lANOSKA 7915 PRESERVEClR ,""', n. 34]19
32382100625 CATHY CYNN moo 791S PRESERVECtR N'-''''' "- 34119
32381100%8 Al.FI<ED VALENTINE 7915 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- ,4119
3238.2100609 \VROTGLl.C 1915 PllESERVEClR NAPLES n. ]4119
n31U100900 ,,- YARWOOD 7915 I'RESERVEClR NAPLES "- 34119
32382101420 BEtJ..AG10 GROUr ue 7925 I'RESERVEC1R NAPLES "- HIl9
32382]01307 GUlLLERMMO BORDA -'925 PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL )~ 119
32382101000 DANmC "'-DEBRA BURNS 7915 I'RESERYECIR N'-''''' <'L J4119
J2JR2101187 LUIGI &. MARY ANN CAMPOBASSO 7925 I'RESERVECIR NAPLES "- )4119
nlB2101064 vnD DEl'RANCESCE 792S l'RESERYEC1R "Ae"" "- 34119
321821014ll<1 >TEeHA"" """ 79:l5 PRESERVEC1R NAPLES "- 34119
32)82]01145 '''''''' JOllTl-ll! J915 I'ltESERVEClR ,'-''''' "- 34119
12UlIO]226 LARKSl'URPROPERTIES '7n5 PRESERVECIR """" n. 14119
323&2101284 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7ns I'RESERVECIR NAPLES "- .14119
32382101446 LAR.KSI'URPROPERl'IESLLC 7')25 PRESERVECIR NAPl.ES "- 34119
32382101323 LARKSP1.ffiPIWPERTffiSLLC 7ns PRESERVEClR NAPLES "- )(119
323&2101103 lARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7925 ~RESE:RVECIR 1,Al'LES " ]4119
32382101048 LARKsPUR PROPERTIES LLC i925 PRESERVE:ClR NAPLES " 34119
1238210098( LARKSPUR I'fWPERTlES!..LC 7n.s PRESERVEClR NAJ~..ES n. ]411~
32382101129 LKGAUDlOI.LC 7"25 PRF..5ERVECIR N""-'" n. .14119
32382101242 ANGELA LOWERY 7'J25 PRESERVECIR N'-''''' "- 34]19
32382101.181 MARas.... USA LLC 1925 I'RESERVECIR NA.I'LI'S "- )4119
3238210]268 AW< MAllO"" 7925 PRESERYECIR NAI'LES n. ]<1119
J23S210136S '><AWN NO><RA' '7925 I'RESERVEClR Nr.J'LES "- 14119
32382101161 ROBERT &.TOYCEM RICCI 7<11S I'RESERVEClR ,'-''''' n. 34119
32382101200 EDWARD RISTAlNO .."~5 PRESERVECIR "'-''''' "- .14]]<)
323821013<19 ""IT TlIOMAS '~25 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- ]41]9
32.182101022 DONALD &HRENDAS WElRJR '7'JH I'RESERVEClR 'Ae"" 1'L 14119
]2382101006 MICHAEL YANOVlCIl 7ns PRESERVEC1R NAPLES " 34119
]2381101608 79JSFA[RWAYPRF"~ERVE 7~15 :'RESERVECIR N'-''''' "- 141\9
n382101569 WAAO ABREU 79J5 I'RESERVECIR N'-'"" "- .)4119
32382101828 CONSTANTINA ALEXANDROU "ns I'RESERVEClR NAPLES n. }41]9
J1381101585 SooTI ALITRGOTI ;915 PRESERVEClR NAPLES "- 34119
32382101763 AND' ARDU1NO BASACCl-II "'-'35 PRESERVE ClR ~A1'LES " .14119
3::382101501 THOMAS & KATHLEEN E 'W<NK 7'jJ5 PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL ]4119
32382\01747 DAVID BROOKINSJR 7~'5 I'RESERVECIR NAPLES n. J411~
32J8l10IS43 STEVEN DONOVAN 7915 PRESERVECIR NAPLES " 34119
)23B2101488 CLINTON &. SHARON K HERDEGEN ."!:I5 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- 14119
32382101705 DRlTAN NDXHAill 7';lS PRESERVEClR NAPLES "- 341]9
32]82101721 M<A SIMON JOIfNSON 7935 "RESERVEClR l'A]'LES n. }~ 119
32.1B2101844 mA KUUG 7S:J5 PllESER\lE:ClR t-;APLES n. )<1119
32382]01909 LARKSPUR PROPE.'nlES LI.C 7'!]~ I'RESER\lE:ClR ,'-''''' ec 14119
32382101462 LJ\RKSPURI'ROPERTlESLLC 7935 PRESERVECIR N'-''''' "- .14\19
32382101666 MATfHEW LrGUORl :'135 PRESERVEClR NAPLF..s ,'C :14119
J21B21D1527 BRIAN M@U.O 7"3:, PRESERVEClR """-'" " :14119
323R1101789 ARM<<< &.PATRlCIA MOORE "':15 PRESERVEC1R NAPLES " 34119
32J82101640 NO""," &.SALLYM '^'" -'~15 PRESERVEC1R NAPLES " 1~ 119
]2382101886 AUN PLATT ?9lS I'RESERVEC1R NAPLES " ]4119
32382101802 RE.!NVESTLLC ,,1]5 PRESER \IE: CiR NAPLES <'L l4il9
32182101925 LOUISE ''''''' ROWlAND 7"35 ~RESERVE CIR NAPLES " 34119
32382101682 LEO SALVATORITR 79,5 I'RESERVECIR NAPI.ES ec 34119
311821O]1l6O ='><AN<E ANNE SZYMANSKI 79]5 PF.ESERVEC1R NAPLES " :14119
31382101624 MICHAEL VOORHIS 7~J5 PRESERVECIR NAPLES " 34119
32382104249 CONST ANTlNA ALEXANDROU ~9.() l'P.,ESERVECIR NA.~LES FC :14119
32382104281 N....TlIAN ARNOLD 79~O PRESERVEC\R NAPLES " 14]19
32382104087 IJAC HOME LOANS SERVlC1W; LP 7'j40 I'RESERVEClR NAPLES e. J4119
32382]04168 "'"'^ BRUNO 794() !'I!.ESERVECIR NAJ'LES n. ]~] ]9
J23821tl4320 "",VEN ClARK 794{) PRESERVECIR NAPLES " J4119
31382104142 '-'<DC COLLINS 7941) rRESERYEClR NAPLES " J4119
32}821038l!-4 FEDERALNATLMRTGASSN 7940 PHESERVECIR NAl'LF..5 ". 34119
32JS210426S GARY &LANAM FrnroN '7')40 I'RESERVECIR NAPLES n. 34119
32J821tl4184 OAR' &. LANA M Fl:WrON 7'!4(] PRHSERVECIR NAPlES ec )4119
32382103868 SMJAY H1NOORANJ "~40 l'RESERVEClR NAPLES n. 14119
32382104029 HOMl'.SALESINC 79~() PRESERVECIR NAPLES e. 34]19
32)82104045 CHARlJ'.s HUGHES ?'l41J I'RESERVEClR NAPLES " .14119
32.lg110J981 ,,AARY BRIAN KA TZBC:CK 1940 I'RESERVECIR N'-'''' n. 34119
32JB2104003 lARKSPUR PROPERTlES LLC 7'14U PRESERVEClR NAJ'LES R ]4119
3238210J923 l.AAKSPUR PROPERTIES [j.C 794~ PRESERVEC\R N,IIJ'l.ES cc 34119
32382103949 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES:.LC 794U PllESERYECIR NAJ>LES "- )~ 1 19
3238210<1100 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC .'940 rRESERVEClR NAPI.F.s "- 34119
.12382][14207 ARTllUR & PATRICIA MOO"' 7'140 PRF.SERVECIR l<;Al'LP.S '" 34]]9
32)82IOJ%5 PROSPECTMORTOAGELLC 7940 I'RESERVECIR NAPl.ES '" 341]9
323821()4]26 MAR'-' 'WH 7940 PRESERVEClR NAPl.ES n. :141]9
32382104223 TIFFIANY mo, 7940 PRf.SE!<VECIR NAPi-ES FL 34119
32381103907 E<UC ,"OIT SIMON 79411 l'RESERVEClR NAPI.ES n. 34119
323811()4l04 DOC TONG '940 l'RESERVECIR NAPLf..s "- 34119
323811()4(161 CHRISTOPHER VALLOZZI 7940 l'RESERVECIR NAPi-ES "- )4119
323E2102089 >UN'" & SOlA r ABMHAM N45 PRESERVECIR NAI'LES "- 34119
n31UI02047 NDY All""" 7~45 PRF.sERVECIR 'AP"" "- )4119
Packet Page -372-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
323821022113 flANK Of AMERICA N A m, PRESERVECIR .wU;S FL 34119
1238110214-4 ."run &, JOU.NTA BAUER 1945 PRESBRVECIR N^""" FL 34119
323112102021 RA>'HAEC DAVID BERKOWITZ 7945 PRESE.RVECIR N^""" FL 34119
U38.2102348 '0"- & WJUAM BETANCOURT 7945 PRESERVE ClR NAPW< FL 34119
32382102225 MAROAAET CAVANAUGH 7945 PRESERVEClR N^""" FL 34119
32382102186 ""'"ON &ELlZABEtH COOK ,~, I'RESERVEclR NAPW< FL 341lg
32382102160 AUmIlA CORREA 7945 I'RESERVECIR NAPW< FL 34]19
32382102403 GEORGE &. MEREDITH DONDERO 7945 I'RESER\lECIR .w"" FL 34119
32382lO2241 SnvlA A1Z.PURVJETE ElOUS 7945 PREliERVECIR N"''''' FL 341]9
32382lO2267 WWAM EPPERLY "" PRE5ER\lECIR NAPLES FL 34119
3238.2lO2380 I'AJRWA Y ACOUlSITlON LLC ,~, PRESERVE cm ""''''' FL 34119
3238.2102005 '0""" GIANOTTI ,~, PRESBRVECIR N^""" FL 34119
3lJ82101983 A"",Y HOLDEN JR 7945 PRESERVECIR N"''''' FL 34119
32381102364 JNe SHERMAN fM.. Y LID PRTNRSHP ,'" PRESERVEClR NAPW< FL 34119
llJB2102122 LARXSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7945 I'RESERVECIR N"''''' FL 34119
32382101941 LARKSJ>UR PROPERTIES LLC 7945 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
323B2102063 LARXSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7945 PRESERVEClR N"''''' FL 34119
32382102102 LARKSPUR PRO!'ERTlES u.c "" PRESERVE CIR NAPW< FL 34119
U382102209 LOBBLID "" PRESBRYECIR N^""" FL 34119
32382102128 mAN CARLO' MUN'" ,~, PRESERVECIR N"'IE' FL 34119
32382102306 MARCEL'. ROJANO 7945 PRESERVECIJI. N"''''' FL 34119
32382101967 JASON & CARA D WEB"'" 7945 l'RESERVEClR .w", FL 34]19
<( 3238210:\.486 MARYB"," ADAM' 7950 PRESERVE ClR N^"",' FL 34119
32382103826 AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC 7950 PRESERVECJR N"'''' FL 34119
CO 32382103389 ruuE BRIDGES 7950 PRESERVECJR N"''''' FL 34119
32382103800 LUIOl & MARY ANN CAMPOBASSO 7950 PRESERVE CIR N"''''' FL .;4119
E 32382]0344<\ Rum DUPONT TR 7950 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34Tl9
32382103680 FAIRWAY PRESERVE AT OLD 7950 PRESERVECTR N"'''' FL 34119
Q) 32382103509 FEDEMLNATLMRTOASSN 79511 J'RESEllvtclll .w", FL 341]9
..... 32381lO3541 SANJAY HINOORANI "'" PRESERVECIR N^""" FL 34119
32382103729 lNVI:STERlNGAR LLC 1ll. "'" PRESERVECIR NAPlES FL ~41 \9
'<"'" 32382103745 lARKSPUR PROPERTIES UX "'" PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL )4119
323B2103606 LARKSPUR PROPERTlE~ LLC 7950 PRESEI<VECIR NAPLES FL 34119
'<"'" 32382103622 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7950 PRESERYECIR N"'''' R 34119
0 32382103460 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES u.c 7950 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 341]9
N 32382103402 lJ>.RKSl'UR PROPERTIES l..LC 7950 PRESERVJ;CIR N^""" FL 341]9
-- 32382103583 DANIEl. &.ElETTYMARTlNA MAffi 7950 PRESERVECIR ""'''' FL 34119
N 32.182H)31!42 ~CNARD &USA MAffi 7950 PRESERVECJR N"'''' R 34119
32382103525 NORA MONTOYA 7950 PRESERVECJR N^"",' FL 34119
'<"'" n382103664 BLAK>; nmMAS MULLALY "'" PRESERVECIR NAPlES FL 34\19
-- 32382103648 ,^"'" NOTO' 7950 l'RES!:iRVECIR NAl'LES R ~.119
'<t 32382]0)761 ,^"'" NOTO' "'" PRESERVEClR NAPlES FL ~4119
323&2103787 '^"'" NOTOf "'" PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
323&2103703 BUOOl &MEGAN ""'IE< 7950 PRESERVECIR NAPI.ES FL 34)]9
32382103567 SECUlUTY NATL LlfS INS CO 7950 PRESERVFCTR NAPLES FL 34]]9
l23B2103428 """'"" SWEIOART 1950 PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL 34]]9
32382102104 79611.627LLC ,~ PRESERVECIR NAPlES FL 34119
31382102500 RUSSEll & NATALIE A ANDERSON '"'' PRESERVEClR "^""" R 34119
n382]02146 DOMlNlC & VERA ANDRENO IU 7960 PRESERVEClR N"'IE' R 34119
32382102568 OON liASLEYJR ,~ PRESERVE CIR N""-'" FL 34119
3231>2102821 mNNITER EISENBERG 7960 PRESERVECIR N"'''' FL 34JI9
313&2102487 """" KELSl(Y "'" PRESERVECJR """"" FL 34119
32382102429 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES ,~ PRESERVECIR NAPIE' FL 34119
32382102526 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES llC "'" PRESERVEClR N"'IE' FL 34J19
32382102542 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC "'" PRE;SEl1VEClR N"''''' FL .14119
32382102843 LARKSl'URPROPERTIESLLC ,%" PRESERVEClR ""'''' "- 34]19
32382102869 l.ARKSPUR PROPERTIES l..LC ,~ PRESERVEClR NAPLES " 34]19
32382102613 LARKSPUR PROl'ERTlES u.c '''''' PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34]19
32382]02801 LOBELTD '"'' PRESERVECIR N"'''' " 34119
31182102811S AllEN MlUEl1TR 7%0 P!lESERVECIR NAPLES FL 341]9
l23821026O7 WlWAM &. MADDALENA MORRONE "'" PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL )4119
32382102445 THOMAS NAREKIAN TR "'" PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL 34])9
32382102788 RICK OSORlO "'" PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL HI19
3HB21026&1 CHRISTOI'l-IER PERRY ;~ PRESERVECIR "^""" " 34119
32382102665 TOMCHI RAlJEVlC ;~ PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34]]9
J2382101762 SHERRY 'AM ,,,, PRESERVEClR N"''''' " 341]9
32382102584 OAVID &PATRlCIA SPlTlfADEN "'" PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
32382102461 WliLlAM &.1EANAA STEPHEN ,~ PRESERVE,cm NAPLES " 34119
32382102649 JOSEI'H &'PATRlZ.lAT TRUP1ANO ,~ PRESERVE em NAPLES " 34119
32382102720 WWAM &. MARY EllDl WHAlEN ,~ PRESERVEC1R NAP\...E!l FL 34119
323&2103208 7965 FAIRWAY PRESERVE ClRCLE ,%, PRESERV\OClR ""'''' FL 34119
3238110~282 RUSSEll &. NATALIE A ANDERSON 7965 PRESERVE CIR """"" FL 34119
32382103321 DANlaA EASACCHI 7965 PRESJ:iRVECll!. N"',-", FL 34119
~2JSlJ03266 NANCY BOELDT 7965 PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
32382103020 ARTIlUR DELONG 7965 PRESERVEClR NAPLES " 34119
32382102908 ARmoR DELONO 7965 PRESERVEClR NAPLES " 34]19
32382102924 co_ &. KATHLEEN G DUNN 7965 PRESBRVEClR NAPLES FL 34]19
32382]()J169 FEDERAL NATIONAl MRTG ASSN 7965 PRESERVECIR NAPLES " 34]19
32382103062 BARBARA FLORES 7965 PRESERVECIR NAPLES FL 34]19
323&2103240 STEVEN &= GLASSER ,%, PRESERVEClR NAPU::S " 34119
323S21OJ305 mREMY HAGAN m, PRESERVE Cll!. NAPW FL 34119
323821029&2 HSBC BANK USA NA TR ,%S PRESEllVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
32382103004 lARKSI'UR PROPERTIES l..LC ,%, PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
Jl382103101 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC 7%5 PRESERVE-ClR N"'''' " HJl9
32382lO3224 !.ARl<SPUR PROPERTIES LLC ,,,, PRESERVECIR NAP'" FL 34119
31382102940 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC ,,,, PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
32382103046 "'""" & WJUA ROKOSZAK 7965 PRESERVE elR N""-'" FL 34119
323821031\!5 '''''''' ROSSER 7965 PRE5ERVEClR N"'''' FL 34JJ9
323&2103363 ALQlRDAS SUVSKlS 7965 PRESliRVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
32382103143 MATIHEW VAN CLEAVE 7965 PRESERVEcm N"'''' FL 34119
32382103127 'rnllA VtElRA '''' I'RESEll.VECIR NAPLES " 34119
J23&l103347 HORATnJ & MA>UANA VINEREAN 7955 PRESf...RVEClR N"'''' FL 34\19
32382102966 MARK VON SORGENFREI ,,,, PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
3238210J0811 WELLSI'AROO BANKN A 1R 1965 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34]19
3lJ82lO4346 '"'" AL,e 7975 PRESERVEClR ""'''' FL 34119
32382104566 AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC 7975 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
32382104401 ""'''' BICKHAM 7975 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
32382]~540 CARWS BUSTOS 1915 PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34]19
32382]~728 '^"'" &. MEA 1HER G BUSTOS "" PRESERVEClR N^"," FL 341\9
32382104469 CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC 1975 PRESERVE CIR NAPLES FL 34119
31382lO474-4 KEvrn &.CONNIE CREWS m, l'RESF...RVECJR NAPLES FL 34119
32382104443 BARBARA FLO,"" 7975 PRESERVEClR NAPLES FL 34119
l2382104362 BARRY &NlNA FRElBURGER 7975 PRESERVEClR NN'LES FL 34119
32382104689 HOMESALES ]NC 7975 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34\19
32J&21~SG3 CHffiYL RAE >ONE 7975 PRESERVECIR N"'''' FL 34119
ll3821~786 >UUA KELSEY 7975 PRESERVEClR N"'''' FL 34119
ll382104809 FADY I.ADlB-IBRAHIM 7975 f>RESERVEClR N"'''' e. 34119
32351I04M7 lAKSPlIR PROPERTIES U.C 7975 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- )4119
32382104663 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES U.C 7975 PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- :\4\\9
32352104427 ROBERT &LOR1C CEAmERMAN 79?5 PRESER\lEClR NAP'" "- 34119
32351\04760 MATIHEW LlOUORl 7975 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- 34119
32382104524 JANICE MOLNAR 7975 PRESERVEClR NAP'" "- J4119
32382104605 em, U""UA POZNIAK 7975 PRESERVECIR N^""" "- 34119
32382I04621 SAlVATORE &: ELEANOR '<=TIA "" PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- 34\19
32382104702 MAR' BRADLEY "'mER 7975 PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- 34\19
32382104583: TFIO fAlRWA YS 7975.1025 UC 7975 PRESFRVECIR NAP'" "- )4]19
32182104388 ANDREW VAlLOZZI 7975 PRESERVECIR NAPLES "- 34119
32382104485 RICHARD WlLLlAMS 7975 PRESER\lECIR NAPLES "- 341]9
323F;;l)OSIKl RIDY ^"" """"" "" PRESERVECIR ""'" "- 34119
32382105210 LOURDES ,= 798S PRESERVECIR NN'''' "- ]4119
323821041167 '''''' "'- fRANCELlA (J ''-'KE 7985 PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- 34119
32382105060 "",,",Y ItCU'illYO HENDER~ON 7')85 f'RESERVECrR NAP'" "- 34119
32382104980 .oNO KIM 7985 PRESERYECJR N^""" "- 34119
32382104825 W,," KIM 79BS PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- .14!19
32382)05125 LAKESJ'URPROPERTlESLLC 7985 PRESERVEClR NAP'" "- .J4119
3238210$0401 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES 7985 PRESERYEClR NAPLES "- 34119
32381105002 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES W.C 7985 PRESERVEClR N"'-" e. 34119
32382105028 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LtC 7~8S PRESERVEClR NAP'" "- 34119
32382105141 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC ;~, PRESERVEClR NAP'" "- 14]19
323821050116 LAlOCSI'URPROPERTlESLLC "i85 PRESERVEClR NAPLES "- 14119
]2JIl2JOSI09 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES LLC ,985 ~RESERVEClR NAP'" "- J4119
323&210521)6 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES U.C 7985 PRESERVECIR NAP'" "- 34119
J13R1105254 LARKSPUR PROPERTIES U_C 7985 PRESERVECLR NAPLES ,.. 34119
31382104883 I...ARKSJ>UR PROPERTIES LLC 79~5 PRESEflVEClR NA>'l.U "- 34119
]2]82]04906 U>.RKSPUFt PROPERTIES LLC 79~$ i'RESERVEClR NN'''' "- J4119
J23R1104922 ro'HARD <lJENNlfER l.1SEKJR 7985 PRESERVECLR NAP'" R 1411 ~
32352105248 VINCENT MCENANEY 79B$ PRESERYECIR NAPLES "- ,4]19
32382104964 RE.lNVESTLLC 7985 PRESERVECLR NAP'" "- ]41]9
32182105222 ,"^'O RITCHIE ,gas PRESERVEClR NAPLES "- 141]9
3238111>4948 DAVID SCHlNl 7985 PRESERVECIR NAPLES R 34119
31382105167 TFlGFAlRWAYS7985-llnLLC 7')B5 PRE~'ERVEClR NAPLES R ]4119
32382104841 MEUSSA ""'''''''' 798S PRESERVEClR NAPLES n. J4119
21990003264 flaME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~[)7(1 DREAMCATCHERClR NAPLES ,.. ]4119
21990003230 HOME. DYNAMICS AMBatTON LLC 8070 DREAM CATCHER C1R NN'LES "- 34119
21990003303 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC Rll7U DREAM CATCHER CLR N"'-" R 34119
21990003129 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8010 DREAM CATCHER CLR NAPLES n 34119
21~O003345 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONU.C 8070 DREAM CATCHER CrR NAPLES R :14119
21'W0003361 HOME DYN"A..MICS AMBERTON LLC 8070 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAP'" R )4119
21990003387 HOME DYNAMICS AMlIERTON LLC H070 DREAMCATCHERCJR NAPLES H. J41\9
21990003400 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC W17(1 DREAM CATCHER C]R NAPLES "- 34119
21990004661 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 81)71 :lREAMCATCHF.JlCIR N^,,'" "- 34119
2199U004687 HOME DYNAMlCS AMEERTON LLC B071 DREAMCATCHERClR NAPLES R .14119
219<10004700 HOME DYNAMICS AMEERTON LLC k071 DREAMCATCHERCIR NAP'" ,.. 34119
21990004726 IlOME DYNAMICS AMBER-TON LLC 8071 DREAM CATCHER elR NAPLES 1-1. J4119
21990004742 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC H071 DREAMCATCHERCIR NAPLES "- 34119
2199000476~ HOME DYNAMICS AMEERTON LLC 8117] DREAMCATCHERC[R NAI'LES "- )4]19
21990004784 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~[)71 DREAMCATCIiERtlR NAPILS "- 14119
2\990004807 110ME DYNAMICS AMBERTON ~LC ~U7j DREAMCATCJ-{ERClR "^"'" "- .14119
21~000452J HOME DYNAMICS AM8ERTON UC HU71 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES R .141 I~
21990004849 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8071 DREAM CATCHER elR N.AJ'LES "- 34119
2199UOO3426 flOME DYNAMlCS AMBERTON LLC RG76 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES " ]4119
2\990003442 HOMEDYNAMlCS AMBERTON LLC 8~76 DREAMCATCHERCIR NAP'" R ]4119
2[9900034611 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER TON at 8076 DREAM CATCHER CJR NN'LES "- J4119
21990003484 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8U76 DREAM CATCHER CLR NAP'" "- 34]19
21990003507 HOMEDYN.oMICS AMBER-TON LLC 8076 DRf.AM CATCHER CIR NAP'" "- :14119
21990003523 HOME DYNAM"!CS AMBERTON u..c H076 DREAM CATCHER CLR NAP'" e. 34[19
21990003549 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8076 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES H. 34\19
21990003S6S HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LtC 8076 :JREAMCATCHFJl CIR NAP'" "- :14119
21990003581 HOME DYNAMICS AMBf:RTON LLC RU76 DREAM CATCHER C1R NAPLES " :14119
21990003604 HOME DYNAMlCS AMBERTON U,C 8076 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAP'" "- .14119
219<)[)004506 HOME DYNAMICS AMIlERTON u.c ,079 DREAM CATC!-itR CIR NAPLES R 34119
21990004522 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONLI.C ,079 DREAMCATCHERCIR NIIJ'LES FL )411~
2199000dS64 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONU.C 8079 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAJ'LES 'c 34\19
11990004580 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC RU7~ DREAM CATCHtRC1R N,lJ'LES "- 341[9
2]990004603 HOME DYNAM]CS AMBERTON liC 81l," DREAMCATCl-{ERCIR NAPLES "- :\d119
2]990004G19 HOME D\'NAMICS AMBERTON LLC or?9 DREAMCATC!-lE[{CIR NAP'" FL J4\19
21990004645 tlOMEDYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8G79 fJREAMCATCHF.RCIR NAPLES FL 14 I 1 ~
21990004';48 ffiill'MY :.EVITT Rn79 DREAMCATCl-{f;[{CIR NAPLES R J4119
219'90004467 HOME DYNAMICS AMllERTON Ll,C 808] DREAM CATCHER cm N"'-" "- )4119
2\990004483 HOME DYNAMICS AM!lERTON Ltc RIlH] DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPlES " 14119
219900J4~02 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC R083 nREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES ,.. )41]9
21990004328 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON U.C ROB) DREAM CATCHER C]R NAPLES "- 341]9
21990004344 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON liC ~OR) DREAM CATCHER elR NAI'LES R ]4119
21990{)(l4360 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER-TON LLC 8(l~3 c>REAMCATCHERC]R NAPLES ,.. :14119
2199OQ(4)S6 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC k083 DREAM CATCHER c[R NAPLES R 341!9
21990004409 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u..c RO~J DREA.MCATCHERCIR NN'''' R ]4119
21990004425 HOM}: DYNAMICS AMBERTUN LtC 8083 DREAMCATCHERcm NAPLES p~ 14119
21990004441 ~ RIVERA 80Bl OREAM CATCHER ClR ~APLES R 34119
219900(14881 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LtC W86 DREAMCATCHERCIR NN'LES " 14]1')
219900049(14 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC RIlR6 PREAMCATC)-ffiRCIR t-:AJ>LES " 14]19
219'J0004no HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 81\R6 DREAM CATCI-lER CIR. NN'LES R .14119
21990004946 HOME DYNAMTCS AMBERTON LtC ~1185 DRLAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES FL .14119
21990004962 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC RII86 tJREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES " 34]19
21990004865 LORENA MA.lJ)ONAJ)O 8086 DREAM CATCHER erR NN'''' "- :14119
21990004140 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON U.C W"' DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES "- .141]9
219900041&6 HOME DYNAMICS AM9E!!.TON LLC W"' IlREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES "- 34119
219900041Rl HOME DYNAMICS MtBERTON LLC K087 IlREAMCATCHERCIR NAPLES " ]41:9
21990004205 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8()R7 DR!;AMCATCHERC]R NN'LES "- 34119
21990004221 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER TON LLC 81187 DREAMCATCI-lEPCIR NAPLES "- 14119
21991'lOO4247 HOME DYNAM1C~ AMBERTON u.c 8087 DREAM CATCHER C[R NN'LES " :\4119
21990004263 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTO'" LLC 8087 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES ,.. HI19
219!1OOO4289 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8081 lJl<EAM CATCHER C]R NAPLES "- .J4]19
21990004988 HOME DYNAMICS A..\lBERTO" LLC RIJ90 !lREAM CATCHER C1R NAPLES n 34119
2]990005000 flOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 81190 :!REAMCATCHERCIR NAP'" " 34119
21990005026 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8:190 :1RI'.AMCATCHERC]R NAP'" " 34119
21990005042 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C 8090 DREAM CATCHER CLR NN'''' Fl )4119
21990005068 IIOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON U.C R(190 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990005084 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON IJ,C ,,~ UREAMCATCI-lEPCIR NAPU;:S "- 34\19
2199()(Y.l3947 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC R1I9] DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES e. 34119
21990003%) HOME DYNAMICS AMBER TON LLC R1l91 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990003989 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~1I9J DREAM CATCHER CIR NAP'" " 34119
21990004001 HOM! DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC B093 UREAM CATCHER CIR NAI'LE,', "- 3411'1
21990004027 HOME DyNA.'....ncS AMBERTON LLC 8(19J I)REAM CATCHER OR NAPLES e. ,4119
219%004041 HOME DYNA/;fJCS AMBERTON tLC ~n91 nREAMCATCHERCfR NAPI.F.5 "- 34119
Packet Page -374-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
~19900041169 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONu.c "ro DREAM CA TCHSR ClR N""" "- 34\19
~19'90004OlCi HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u.c 8093 DREAM CATCHER em N^",,' "- 34119
21990004108 HOMEDYNAMlCS AMBERTONu.c .~, DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES "- 34119
21990004124 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u..c .~, DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
2199000510" HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LtC "', DREAM CATCHER CJR. NAPLES FL 34119
219'10005123 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER-TON UC .~. DREAM CATCHER CIR N",-", "- 34119
219911OOS149 HOME DYNAMlCS AMBERTON u.c .~. DREAM CA TotER em N""" "- 34119
21990005165 HOME DYNAMICS AMElERTON U-C ."" DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- 34119
21990005181 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON ll.C ''''' DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- 34119
2199000S204 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u..c "'" DREAM CATCHER elR N"'S "- 34119
2.1990005220 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC "'" DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- 34119
2I!l9OOOS246 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u.c ,~. DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- )4119
2199OOJ5162 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C "" DREAM CATCHER elR N""" Fe 34119
21!l9OOO51U HOME DYNAMICS AM8ERTON U.C "" DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- 34119
21\19Ol'XJ5]01 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u..c "'" DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" "- 34119
2199000S3!7 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC "'" DREAM CATCHER elR NAPLES "- 34119
2199000534] HOME OYNAMlCSAMBERTON UC ,~. DREAMCATCHERCIR N""" Fe 34119
21990005369 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC "" DREAlvl CATCHER CIR NAl'LE' "- 34119
21990005385 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON U-C "'" DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
119!lOOO5408 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONll.C "'" OREAM CA TC.'HER CIR N""" Fe 34119
21990005414 HOME OYNAMlCS AMBERTON U.C "'" DREAM CATCHER ClR N""" "- )4119
<( 11990005440 HOMEDYNAMJCSAIvlBERTONLLC 81112 DREAM CATCHER CIR ""''' "- )4119
11990005466 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u.c 8102 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990005482 HOME DYNAMICS AMBDtTON LtC 8102 DREAM CATCHER em ""''''' "- 34119
CO 21990005505 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONUC 8102 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
21990005521 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON U.C ~102 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
E 2199OOll5547 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ,,,. DREAMcATCHERelR N""" "- 34119
21990005563 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C ,,,, DREAM CATCHER elR NAPLES "- 34119
Q) 21990005589 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8106 DREAM CATCHER erR NAPLES Fe 34119
:!=. 219'.lOOO5602 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8106 DREAM CATCHER CIR N^",,' " )4119
21990005628 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONU.C ,,"' DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES 11. 34119
..- 1199000S644 HOME DYNAMICS AMElERTONIU: ,,"' DREAM CATCHER CIR N",-", "- )4119
21990005660 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ,,"' DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
..- 21990005686 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ,,"' DREAM CATCHER CIR NAFl" "- 34119
0 21990005709 HOME OYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ,,"' DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES Fe 34119
N 11990005725 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONUC ,,"' DREAM CA TCHE!R C1R NAl'LES "- 34119
-- 21990005741 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONU,C 8110 DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES "- 34119
N 21990005767 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC SliD DREAM CATCHER CIR N""-" "- 34119
21990005783 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8110 DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES "- 34119
..- 21990005806 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON UC 8110 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES ,~ 34119
-- 219900051112 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON l.l.C 8110 DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES "- 34119
'<t 1\990005848 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8110 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
219\>0005864 HOME DYNAMICS AMBDtTON LLC 8110 DREAM CATCHER ClR NAPLES "- 34119
219900058&0 HOME DYNAMICS M$ERTON LLC ~110 DREAM CA TCl-{ER CIll NAPLES "- )4119
219900037115 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONLLC 8113 DREAM CATCHER ClR NAl'LE' FL 34119
21990003808 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONLLC 8113 DREAM CATCHER CIR "^""" " 34119
21990003&24 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 811) DREAM CATCHER CIR ""''''' "- 34119
21990003840 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTONLLC 8113 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990003866 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON liC 8113 DREAM CATCHER ClR N""" " 34119
~1990003U2 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8113 DREAM CATCHER CIR N",-", Fe 34119
21990003905 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER-TON LLC 8113 DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES " 34119
21990003921 HOME DYNAMICS AMI:lERTONLtC 811l DREAM CATCHER cm NAPlloS. "- 34119
11990005903 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8116 DREA/vl CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
2199000$929 HOME DYNAMICS AMSSRTON U.C 8115 DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES "- 34119
21990005945 HOME OYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C 8116 DREAMCATCHERCIR NAPLES "- )4119
119900(15961 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C 8116 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
21990005987 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON u.,c ~116 DREA/vl CATCHER CIR. NAPLES "- .,4119
21990006009 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8115 DREAM CATCHER cm NAPLES "- 34119
21990006025 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8115 DREAM CATCHER C1R NAPLES "- 34119
21990006041 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~1l5 DREAM CATCHER elR "^,,C" " 34119
21990003520 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8117 DREAMCATCHERCIR "^,,C" Fe 34119
1199000~646 HOME DYNAMICS AMBER-TON LLC ~117 DREAM CATCHER CIR N""" Fe 3411~
11990003662 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8117 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
21990003688 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8117 DREAM CATCHER em N""" "- HI19
219900(mOl HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTaN ac 8117 DREAM CA TCHEll cm NAPLES Fe 34119
21990003717 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8117 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990003743 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~117 DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES Fe 34119
11990003769 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON Ll.C 8117 DREAM CA TCI-ffiR CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990006067 HOME DYNAMICS AMElERTON liC "'W DREAM CATCHER CIR NAPLES ,,- 34119
21990006l1ll3 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8no DREAM-CATCl-IERCIR NAI'LES "- HI19
21990006106 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8120 DREAM CA TCl-1ER ClR NAPLES Fe 34119
21990006112 !lOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC Sl20 DREAM CA TCfffiF CIR NAPLES "- 34119
21990006148 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC 8120 OREAM CA TCIlER CIR N""-" Fe 34119
21990006IM HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON UX 8110 DREAM CATCHER elR N""" "- 34119
119900U6180 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC ~120 DREAM CA Tc:HER elR NAPLES "- 34119
11990006203 HOME DYNAMICS AMBERTON LLC '1m DREAM CATCHER CIR. NAPLES " )4119
21990006129 HOME DYNAMICS AJvlBERTON l.LC "'W DREAM CA. TCHER elR NAPLES "- 34119
21990006245 HOME OYNAMlCS AMBERTON LLC 8120 DREAM CATCHER elR NAPLES >~ 34119
190041209 '""'" PAFFENDORF , NURSERYLN N""" Fe 34119
0018940??oo GEORGE &PEOaV ARCHJBA1..D '"' NURSERY LN NAPLES "- 34119
(1(I1911~IOO5 WAYNE SPAl-lL1NGER 210 NURS!:;"'RYLN ""''''' n 34119
00189]20009 RA YMONO &USAA PELlETIER :15 NURSERY LN NAPLES " )4119
0018llS80003 BEVERLY MOORE '" NURS,,"'RYLN """" n 34119
0019004110l TJNAJ>LESLC '" NVRSERYLN NAPLES "- )4119
001884??oo1 TJNAI'LESLC '" NURSSRYLN NAPLES "- 34119
00190001750 THO,"" RAISER '" NURSERY LN NAPLES "- 34119
oo1892WQOO LElSA BAABARA BRAWLEYTR ,SO NURSERY LN NAPLES "- )4119
001900-40103 RAYMOND & USA PELLETmR 4(,5 NURSERYLN NAPLES " ]4119
001896&0008 ALFONSO & DIANE J FONlDEVlLl.A ''" N1JRSERYLN NAPl.ES "- 34119
001119240008 "'N'" & MARY RAlSERTR '" NURSERY LN N""" "- )4119
00189S2000J ALFONSO &DIANEJ FONTDEVll.A '" NURSERYLN NAPLES "- 34119
00189160007 AKTLL1..C '" NURSERYLN NAPLBS "- 34119
00189560005 ROBERT &LYNETIE DAVENPORT '" NURSERYLN NAFl" "- 34119
00188910002 NORTII NAPLES fIRE CONTROL ''" NURSERY LN NAPLES A. 34119
""'''"''''''' NOR11-I NAPLES FIRE CONTROL "" NURSERYLN NAPLES "- 34119
188840001 GRACE.KELLY lLC ''''' ROSE BLVD N""" "- 34119
001&86040007 GeaRnE &J>EGQY J AAOWALD '" ROSE BlVD N",-", "- 34119
00188760000 OM'" STAFFORD ''" ROSE BLVD N""" "- )4119
00188800009 JUDSON AU'O>ID '" ROSE BLVD NAPLES "- 34119
00188600005 mHBUNE SMlTll ,,, ROSE BLVD N""" "- 34119
00189480004 W""-"M "OND '" ROSE BLVD NAPLES "- 14119
001891200(}5 0""" MASCHINO '" ROSE8LVD NAPLES Fe 34119
0018944000~ """"" JOHANNINO '" ROSE8LVD "^""" "- H119
00189960003 DAVID &JAMAj lONES '" ROSE8LVD NAPLES Fe HI19
00188440003 m, KURTH '" ROSE aL VD NAPLES "- 34119
U0188120006 HO '-AM '" ROSE BLVD NAPLES "- 34119
00189000002 '0""'" RICHARDSON '" ROSE BLVD NAPLES "- 34119
001898110OO2 "''' BRAWLEY TR m ROSE BLVD NAPLES "- 34119
(01891)40004 >0_ RJCHARDSON ", ROSE BLVD <AP"" "- 34119
00189920001 BIO- TECH SERVICE COUlER INC '" ROSE BLVD <^'"" "- 34119
0018'1480006 IMCOUJERJOlm VENTURE '" ROSE BLVD <AP'" "- .34119
001890110OO6 ""m MASCHINO '" WOOOLAND AVE <AP"" "- 34119
00187160009 IMCOLUER JOINT VENl'1JRE NO SITE ADDRESS <AP"" "- 34119
64625000366 COlLtERCOUl.rrY 7116 01.OECYrR,ESSBLVO NAPLES "- 34119
64625000285 Ol.OE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY 7119 01.OECVPR,ESSBLVO NAP"" "- .34119
6462$001983 OLOE CYPRESS DEV L TO 7150 OLOE CYPRESS BLVD NAP"" "- Wl9
00183600000 0U1 DEVELOPMENT LLLP ,,~ 01.OECYPR,ESSBLVD NAPLES "- 34119
68640120007 aUAIL CREEK PROPERTY OWNERS 4886 POND APPLE OR S <AP"" "- 341)9
68641800009 ,,_ POWERS ..~ POND APPLE DR S <^'"" "- 34119
68641760000 DO<All &.IlU.M JACKSON 12801 PONDAPPLEDRE N^",' "- ]4119
56105508008 LONGSHORE LAKES FOUNDATION INC 10690; LONGSHORE WAY N^,"" "- 34119
56110003365 ''''''' &; PAULA S LYn.< '"'" LONGSHORE WAY E N^",' "- ]4119
56110003381 """"'- NEID'GH ,~~ LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- '14119
5611ooo34D4 ELIOT ""'"' 10679 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
561]0003420 ruu, 'HELL' 10691 LONGSHOREWAYE NAP"" "- 34119
5611000]446 ROBIN &.l'RANCACUDA BLAKKOUl 1071] LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
56110003462 PAUL &.RUTIJA ""TI" 107]5 LONGSHOREWAYE N^,"" "- .34119
56110003488 WUllW SIN]STORE 10757 LONGSHORE WAY E N^,"" "- 34119
56110003501 OBA YEnOR ''-''MA <NAN 10779 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
5611000]527 _AM a.KBRIA MaD 10801 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
56110003543 CAROL & BONITA """''''' "ill LONGSHORE WAvE NAPLES "- 34119
56110003569 """-" &;TRlNACEB """ 10845 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56110003585 DlJWAYNE & DONNA L TEUBERT IOllG7 LONGSHORE WAVE NAPLES FL 34119
561100036llll "''''' SCHULTZ. 108B9 LONGSHOREWAYE NAP'" "- 34119
56110004283 RONALD BOGARDUS 1091: LONOSl-lOREWAYE NAP"" "- 34119
56110004306 CHERYL >CEO""'" '-"H 10913 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 341)9
56]10004321 PAUL & JEANEITE I' DAVIN 10955 :.oNGSHORE WAY E NAPLES FL 34119
561]0004348 GMY WOLTER 1097i LONGSHORE WAY E N^,"" "- 34119
56]]0004364 W"",,,N GOTTIER TR """ LONOSl-lORE WAY E NAPLES '"- 34119
56110004380 H'N'" .""', """" 11031 LONOSHORE WAY E NAP'" "- 34119
56\111004403 BRUCE BUCHSBAUM 11053 LONGSHOREWAYE NAP"" "- 34119
56110004429 GEORGE &.ANAL COREY JR 11075 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 341]9
'6110004445 CUfI'ORD &XET NO""" 11091 LONGSHORE W A \{ E NAP"" "- 34119
56110004461 "" 'ELL 11119 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" FL 34119
561lllOO4047 LONGSHORE LAKE FOUNDATION INC 11122 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56]lllOG4487 ""'" HUNS1CKER 11141 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 3~ 1)9
56110004500 STANLEY & LUCILLE KOSTECK] 11163 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP'" "- 34119
56110004526 WUllW . MARLENE , LUM!< IIIB5 LONGSHORE W A \{ E NAP'" "- 34119
561055]2955 ,""'-' '""" 11261 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPlES rL 341]9
5610,512900 LAKESIDE OF NAPLES !NC 11283 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES " 34119
5610551285B """"" K1NGSBlJRY 11305 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" FL 34119
56105512803 "UL & FAYE LOSI 11327 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56105512751 VICTOR &EOITHE LOMBARDO 11349 LONGSHORE WAVE N^"", "- 34119
S6lO5512706 >OHN SCHELLENBERG 11371 LONmHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56105512654 WCUAM It.SUSANC FLORJO 1139] LONGSHOREWAYE NAPlES "- 34119
561055]2405 """'AAA GANLY'I1l. 11503 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
561055l2]53 >OHN CROUSETR 11525 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56105512.100 """ I'ICINICH 11547 LONUSHOREWAYE NAI'LES FL 34119
56105512256 ~"""" ABOIATR 11S69 LONGSHORE WAY E N^,"" "- 34119
56105512201 ,,",,,y SIMPSON 11591 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP'" "- 34119
56105512159 >OHN "UH 11613 LONOSHOREWAY E <AP"" FL 34119
56105512104 """'- PASCO 1163S LONGSHORE W A \' E N^,"" "- 34119
56105512052 JOHN COX 11657 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
561115511503 ANlHONY & ROBERTA M DNE<RE 11679 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES FL 34119
S6IOS511451 R]CHARD &JANlCEM ""NOE 117Ul LONOSHQREWAYE NAPLES "- 34119
56105511406 "Ma' &; DIANA H JESSEEJR 11723 WNGSHOREWAYE N"'"" "- J~ 11 9
561055113S4 "''''' DAVISON 11745 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34119
56105511309 BRUCE & JANET M """"'''' 11767 LONGSHORE WAY E NAP"" "- 34]19
56105511257 """'" &< ROXANN S BAGNlUK 11789 LONOSHORE WAY E N^,"" FL 34119
56105511202 WALTER KOZLOWSKI TR 11811 LONGSHORE WAYE NAP"" "- 34119
56105511150 ''''''' & DEBORAH A HWPERT IIB33 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
561ll551] 105 """" FELDMAN 1]855 LONGSHORE WAY E NAPLES "- 34119
56\05511752 mo,,^, """"'" ~; DUNLINCT NAPLES "- 34119
56105511707 >0""" ''''GaA MUSSOJR ,,~ DUNUNCT N^",' "- 34119
561055111104 FREDERICK & LORI S BROWN 4H8 DUNLINCT NAP'" "- 34119
S610551 1655 CYNTHIA YOUNGTR "" DUNUN CT N^"" "- 34119
561055111159 >OHN ."'''"' FAUP 4472 DUNLlN CT NAPLES "- 34)19
56105511600 JOSEl'H & RITA V 1M'" 44~) DUNLIN CT NAPLES "- 34119
56105511901 OEORGE &JOSEPHlNEC >Em "" DUNlIN CT NAPLES FL 34119
56105511558 u;o . KAAEN " HE]FETZ "" DUNUNCT "^"" "- 34119
56105511956 ANllIONY &. VALERIE BRUNO 4496 DUNLINCT N^",' "- 34119
5610551W07 IIDMUND &. BARBARA TIlffiLE 4508 DUNUN CT NAPLES "- 34119
56105512609 ROBERT & EllEN" GAYLE 11415 KESTIill.cr NAPlES FL 34119
56105512557 PAUL &EVELYNL KElGAN 11437 KESTRELCT N^,"" n, 34119
56]05512502 JANET KNAUBER TR 11459 KESTRELCT NAPLES "- 34119
56105512450 >OHN &MARYJO LAM<DE lldl KESTRELCT NAPLES "- 34119
561060Cl6224 DONALD &.LYNNEB , ARXER 4501 MERGANSER CT NAPL" FL 34119
561(l6O(l5208 """ &""''"'"'' ,-""" 4502 MERGANSER CT NAPLES FL 34119
56106006240 JOA."I MOOGAN ZUCKERMAN 452) MEROANSER CT NAP"" " 34119
56lll6OO6185 """"" EHIlliAA'''''' 4524 MERGANSER CT NAPLES "- 34119
56106006266 GAYLORD & ELlZABETH A ""YER 4545 MERGANSE:R CT NAPLES "- 34119
56]06OO6Hi9 I{GBERT BROITZMAN 4546 MERGANSEll CT ""'"" "- 34119
56]ll6OO62B2 OAR' 'KAAENL """ 4567 MERGANSER CT "^'"" "- 34119
56106006143 ro"""" & KAREN SEOLA.C1K 4568 MERGANSER CT NAPLES "- 341J9
561060136305 ''''''' &PATRlCIAJ 1IAMMe' ,,~ MERGANSER CT NAPLES CL 34119
561l16OO6]27 mo,,^, & NANCY J GLYNN '"'' MERGANSER CT NAPLES FL 34119
56106006321 """"'" PRESTIA TR 4611 MERGANSER CT "^'"" "- 34119
56106006101 ROBERT &ROBYNL we",,",y 4612 MERGANSER CT NAP"" CL 3~ 119
56106006347 ""HAa PYLES 46~3 MERGANSFJ< CT NAl'LES "- 34119
561060060B8 HARR' """'''' 4634 MERGANSERCT N^,"" "- 34119
5611~1:U F>ANKU< MCCLAIN 4370 POMAR!NE 1:'1 NAPLES "- 34119
561100Cl<l144 >OHN & GRACE MC DONALD 4371 POMARlNE CT NAPLES "- :14119
5611llOO4I02 JOSEI'H &MAR:.ENE CIACC]O 4376 POMARlNEcr NAPLES "- 34119
56110004160 "'HARD lk. NORMA L >Em 4377 POMA1UNE CT NAPUlS "- 34119
56110003681 mAN< BARBERA TR 43B2 POMARfNECT N^,"" "- 14119
561100ll4-186 SEVOUOH CORPORAT]ON 4383 POMAR]NE n NAPLES CL 34JI9
56)10003666 "-rnrn MASLOWSKl TR 4JB8 I'OMARINECT NAl'LES "- 34119
56110004209 Ul.WRENCE &YINYI 'IIELK' 4389 POMARINE CT NAPLES "- 34119
S61Ioo03640 CHRISTOPHER GIBBONS 4_194 rOMARlNE CT NAP"" FL 34119
56110004225 """ HAA.< 4395 POMARINECT NAPlES CL .14119
56110003624 LEONARD &:.DONNAJ MA" 441)() POMAR1NE (', NAPLES "- 34119
5611llt104241 NOa & MARY R MURI'HY "" I'OMARINE CT "AP"" "- 34119
56llllOO4267 BR>OH &WCILLE HOfFMANN 4407 POMARlNE CT "AP"" "- 34119
56IOS511053 EUGENE & ROBERTA M WRIGHT 451B LONGSHORE WAY N NAPLES c_ 34119
Packet Page -376-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
S6lO551100B MONICA ORAND' ,.. LONGSHORE WAY N NAP"" "- :14119
56]05510957 HOWARD kN....NCYEC WElSBERG 4494 LONGSHORE WAY N N""'-'" "- 34119
56105510805 _0'"' k GEORGAN H NORMAN <<" AVOCETCT NAPLES "- 34119
5610S510l!50 ""'OW """"NO"" 4410 AVOc.:ETCT N"'"" CL 34119
56lO5510901 """"" lAMBERT TR 448:2 AVOCETCT NAJ'LES "- Wl9
56105514:!O'J '"""'" &:. DIANE M DAVIS 1183\ NIGHT HERON DR NAPLF-' " 341\9
56]05514157 "''''N kDOPJSE CASEY 11814 NIGHT HERON DR ''''"'' "- 34119
56105514101 "" 00'-"" MCKELVEY 11192 NIGHT HERON DR N"'"" "- 34119
56]05513459 DREOO" kBETHA WEB"" 4719 KI11lWI\XECT NAP"" FL 34119
56105513051 MARGMET k MICHAEL E "'''''' 41JO KITTlWAKECT N"'"" "- 34119
5610SS134D4 ROHER' &:. VERONICA 'AAKER ,. 4741 KITTIWAKE CT NAPLES "- 34119
56105513103 EU_ D,," 4752 KmlWAKE CT NAP'" "- 34119
56105513352 ,""- &:.JOYCEA DEPASOUALE 4163 Km]WAKE CT NAP"" "- 341)9
5610551315B V'VL<N LOGANTR 4774 K!TTJWAKECT N"'"" "- 34119
56105513307 "'''''''' kLlNDAB ""'-'ON 4785 K1111WAKECT N"'LES "- 34119
56105513100 ''''''' & JUDY "'" 47% KnTlWAKE CT NAP"" "- 34119
561lJS51,2S5 NORMAN & JANE K MEYERS 41102 KITTIWAKE CT NAPLES " 34119
561026110000 "^VW w.oW^, "" SHEARIVATER LN NAP'" FL .34119
56102640008 BURTON ""'D<E ,~, SHEARWATERLN NAP"" "- 34119
56lln6Ci0006 ''''''' &. ROSEMARY F 'ELL "" SHEARWATERLN NAP"" "- 34119
56]0256OOOi mNNY HAAm "" SHEARWAT'ER LN NAPLES "- .'\4119
5610600,706 TREVOR &.BAERBEL SANDS n71 BITTERN CT NAPLES Fe .34119
<( 56106003256 DAVID &.CHRlSTINEM 'ERR' 4372 8lTIERNCT NAPLES ". 34119
56106003654 "''''' "'SUSAN MC MAHAN 4393 BITTERN CT NAPLES "- 34119
CO 5610600]JOll SHlR1EY ZEPl'ElIWTR 4394 BlTTERNCT NNW "- 34119
56106003609 MARGARET POLEY 441~ llnTERNCT NAPLES "- 34119
E 56106003J53 HARRY &. THERESA M HANBURY 4416 BITTERNCT NAP"" " 34119
56106003557 "'''''''' &.GRETCHEN HOLTTR 4437 BtTTERNCT NAJ>LF_~ "- 34119
a.> 56106003405 <Ern'" "ENE' TlEfENBACH 4438 B1TTERNCT NAPLES "- 34119
:!:::: 56I06OOlS02 """ kNANC'i F]NGER 4459 BmERNCT NAP"" "- 34119
56106003450 GRANT kSUSANC BROSSEAU 4460 mTTERN C, NAP'" " 34119
.,- 56106002707 >OW'" SCHOELER 10804 PHOENIX WAY NAP"" CL 34119
56106002655 NENR' &:. ]KUKO M WOODJR 10782 PHOENIX WAY NAPLES " 34119
.,- 56106002600 JOSEPH SANFlLLIPOJR 1077, PHOENIX WAY NAlW "- 34119
0 561ll6OO2558 "'IN &. DONNA M KOONCE 10193 PHOENIX WAY NAPLES "- ~4119
N 5611000,349 OOM FDX 436~ LONGSHORE WA Y S NAPLES "- 34;19
--- 56]1000332] KATItLEEN BRICETR 4:162 LONGSHORE WA'i S NAPLES "- 34119
N 5611000,307 F"'" EDWARDS TR ';351; LONGSHORE WAYS NAlW " 34119
56110003284 BEULAH FERGUSON 4350 LONGSHORE WAY S NAPLES Fl. 34119
.,- 56110003268 QUANG nANQ 4:144 LONGSHOREWAYS NAP"" CL 34119
--- 56110003242 "''" & JEANETTE 'ALA 4J3~ l.ONGSHOREWAYS NAPLES "- 34119
'<t 41941040007 OUllEN W""",R OAKWOOD PARK WEST LLC 217(l LOGAN BLVD NORTH NAPLES Fe ]4119
]%6S03(l5 ClIU..EN w= OAKWOOD PARK WEST 11.C 217(; LOGAN BLVD NORTH NAP"" Fe 34119
I~BOOOI OAN<EC PECKTR 7895 ......1I0I4ERDRM: NAPI..ES "- J41O'J
)95040001 DANlEL PECKTR 7895 Q,O,RONERDRlvt NAPLES "- 34109
195360008 OAKWOOD PARK WP..5T ll..C 7550 IMMOKALEE RD NAP"" Fe :14119
I~SlI80003 RAYMOND C\..E.ARYJR 7576 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES " 34119
7265000054] SATURNlA LKS HMOWNRS ASSOC lNC 76(1'.) lMMOKA.LEE RD r-<APLES "- 34119
?USOOOO168 SATURNlA LKS HMOWNRS ASSOC INC 7652 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES " 34119
71650001541 ROBERT ,<aM '''0'' 2446 BUTTERfLY PALM DR NAPLES "- 3411~
72650001S68 V""",, NANCY m' 245\< flUTTERFL Y PALM DR 'AP'" Fe 34119
72650001584 ERNE" "'DlANES GARCIA 2447 aUTTERFL'i PALM DR NAP'" "- 34119
195120002 JOSEPH DOL .510 CI'V>I4TELlLO~ NAPLES FL 34119
49660100385 HERJT ACE GREENS GOLF 22115 HERITAGE GREENS OR NAPLES " 34119
".."''''' SCHOOL DISTRICT -GCHILOE 78n SHARK WAY NAPLES "- 34119
5114'O(XJ:l6S CORNERSTONE UNITIill METHODIST 820:' ]MMOJ(AlE[ RD NAPLES FL 34119
51147D456g9 -= DOMINGUEZ.. SIlOS SJVONWAY NAPLES FL 34119
51147045702 PAU'..A LAGUNA H012 SIVONWAY NAPLES CL 34119
51147045728 W.11HEW z= HOl6 SIVONWA'i NAPLE.5 Fe 341 1~
51147lJ45144 W"""'" &:.JEA...."NEM JOHNSON 8020 SIVONWAY NAPLES Fe 34119
51147D45J60 ROBERT RUSSO H024 SIVONWAY NAPLES "- :14119
51147D4S7116 ,ErE' TRlPOO1 8028 SrVONWAY N^",' "- 3~119
51147D451lO9 FREDERICK ROBINSON gOJ2 SlVONWA'r NAPLES R 3~119
51147045B25 CIIERY~ CLAUSEN 80:1(, SIVONWAY NAPLES "- 34119
51147045841 JOSEPH D1SClULLO 811411 SIVONWAY NAPLEJ; FL J4:19
51147D45~67 m,,, DILEO.ACUNA 81144 SlVONWAY NAPLES CC 3~ 119
51147D45883 SUSAN WE"" 804g SIVONWAY NNW " 34119
51147045906 MARK kCOlU.lSSC CAUlWELL BOS~ SIVONWAY NAPLES "- 34119
51147045922 LAWRENCE kNANCYC WlSHAR1 80$6 SIVON WAY NAPLES "- 34119
5114704594B '''''" MARTINEZ 8[)60 S]VON WAY NAPLES " 34!19
683~14461Og BOUGAINVIllEA CENTER LLC noo PRJ::SERVELN NAPLES "- 34119
68391446;05 CYPRESS SELl' STORAGE LLC 77S$ PRESERVELN NAPLES R 34119
6B39144611\6 J PEACEFVL L C 777(1 rRESERVELN N""'-'" R 34119
683914460B5 OLDECYPRESSDf'VLTP 7774 PRESERVE LN NAPI..K~ "- J4119
68J91446182 7?65 PRESERVElANELLC 7715 PRESERVELN NAPLES "- J4119
68391446027 OlDE CYPRESS DEV LTO 2M7 PROFESSIONAL-CIRCLE. NAPLES Fl 34119
II
I
,
4/12/2011 Item 8A
_____n___ ._1[1 ~~~~4,-!~gM:.,4~;$.--.J.j:k ~---.Lr:;JlIij.JIQ.--c- ____.____
.-.------ - ~~.~.-.':;[~---~~t-:.--.-------..--..-..-.. .._..._ ._... ....._ ._.__._ __... ..._.___.__._:....._ ...._.... _.._..___ .__.
------- tJA~ ------ -- ---- fl~s -- ----. C-- '---r~---' ;;,...,.,'/ ____H.
----- -'- - l~~ CJi~~__ _ _~.o.'i \S:ri! I~_~~_{).__~J~. !a-_ __~~.J2'_k~ve~~~
--------- ~e}~~._~\J!!!!1_____"?)?3_m.O"!:~Y-f>~!L __~1.?--.----.--. "'__"'_ _____
--- ____un _~_..t/M.4~~A.~4-vc~ -~Z~~!!~J;IL~-R..tf"-- ...._.___~_._~_______ _.__.___.
~~IM(Mh ntdl.LJ ~IOJr ~~ <'-r. ;(MIIIt'./t..I~'f'S'6Y4-r.,.,.~
_.._._-----------,- ---..-"----..-.--.---.-.-..------....---.. ------ --- -.--.-----------------,.---- -.-.-------.-------.-.......:---. -.-....----..-- --.
________.________~5.~5c...~Jl. ___?'i!_~_.~~_tl~_._ ___ck!,-I:..$ ~t:~c~~~t..,
---------..--.~tJ1~r3--s..~Ko.r:~.-..1.1KL7iedln~JtJJAkfj~d"'
__._____ ~_~_I/ttt"_:5._____l7~--~ e -.._~&"'__ -:_~l>...~___~~P';l._.~~s;
.. ......__ l2t:", )~]- ~7 b3.~JJ..~~!JJ::g__?J..s'_~_____.__.\:.. __~_____.______ ~.___
------.---.-. :&__!iDL_ -.------------------------------ ----...--~lf@ eQ~
----- JJ !.!!'.!!..~. t::..$g_gr____il...'ff._'i!lj~~~Bl>.E.._Le __ L_._.___)c4'c'6~ 7e.IJo~IJ$Z~
---------.-~izL~----------Z81_~~A~.J).c._____-v_~Je~.L,lJ~~~
__c. G~~ _____.'!..____~ '____'~____...:..._______.'..~___________
---------. /~ ---._.__~~!_i-~_~~~___~!~~-~~".--~-
---~- _ .- ..~~-;~L~~-~--~"'.-_pl-.-~
--......-..-..-- -6!!-C~_w'eld_'1--.-~.J/e2..~~-~J.~-tJX'fL-~t/:.e/.~~.~~
4 _e;;, _____.__ _.J~ () ~. -r~tINr.~L___ -:t-...I'f.PIr.9Xi'IfI/!.' .coJ{ ______
, ~~:z. 3.. (l.~"........... _ C+hQ"~~"\",,.<>",
- ~r41lJ___~ ~_l._4#A-;~f~ f!!--d-.----e.ftAfJe~{ii:l!t!,(~A:~~r
.---;' .
- ..--. --">."
. - - ~ J. 7h _ _ _ ~ _
--- ,ert:-~-~-~~':;:d:=~_
-~. 'b ~~~:h~~5~;:'
-- cs:~L~.______31~-----. .____~- __.~__._____.
_____ -~0/f2 (<.19()re~ _J2I;l..f,_..r..~~_q- _r"':t9/J_~ e..~~...
O~/ C ~rr 3. })s'J:.rr<-"""'vC;;-r..___J.~t.-tr-'l.-4~--~.L-.
Packet Page -378- ~ - .
y'J.e-.. TL<.~c-~ ~ OI.k..C,fJ"U44 N::r.M IO/'8ft.:>
<;"~i~skuJ-
-~-- n~J:~~- ~ _~n~ ~,,~\'-----
________h J~L\?v_~~--. __}JJ!bS~~~_~~.__._j~y:r~~YrQ~~!~~
~__._____ M Ll(e-l-7~~~_\_~~~~~___:?JP_~~~~_?~.__~~a>4
_____._______ .~L~~\1~ ~_Q~___.1.':~4~.~1l)VI.L~Sl._\l.yi_.-~~~~~~
~ ______ . bhe:t~j"4,,ft.1J.~.b-~--- _2L2,..LJe.r+a.n1QJ:J?.L___M&Uy_Q) ~hoa,~
~_____ ~~ (,!'~_____.3_Q~~__f~~:D;!"".._'~~AA~_~c.~
Q) f.I. .
~~~~~C~~~=~i~;~~~~~~~~~~
~ ....._____._. ~~_Z._1Z"k--_.~f .3o_T~.#_~.___.....t!~~A1A.~1UsZ;.
~ .::r f;FrlU !:cft)~~._~~fJ.:~. M..c!.1!!..1_Y~J!.~t!tJ._ <:L/If FBiL41L1J?;::
----.----... .. ~~:Pflf~/i!JtP.L ..z?f6.Q,D.r..-q~Qe._C-i:_~I*.i~. ~" ~~
. _____ ._J~tyllU...l!lftOiJ_.__.__. .._7H!?.TJe!flr.4Nv:._?!../!,.,____ _ ..._(]1l~de...e' <el Q oJ:.~':'!_._
. :.L&.CLlLW.bd~___~J:k!)f>,.._~~...lh.---~~
_____._ J1/4"'-~~'J.I.&.kJ:,......__ _______.ol..7i',;,_J2J"O'~_ ~L"'_~S.J lJ,L__J:AM:'f1.MJ.J,.r1.~_e.mj7'lL9_
, ~. Ml7-l.c.doft.I
__________ ._iJ..L_} _~~1~~_ ___~L~]'~Io'(<:lmor__\h_,..._ _~:;_J~S-3!1.~_!1..~~~~0I.._
.._________ f-L'l_ /--WJ.b2._._.31/ (~_;,~_ c:r___ Ltl:r~g; :z;t"!'k~I11___
________ RofJ _ ~(1I~_____c__ d-.8~Ll.~(j,(/E._P.CA/.ELtL.c ___ ._____._ __._______.
I . 1.<.
. -.------1 U~_Lif3 E 55- ___2..ffJ.!L~Bffi.!iNI't-'::#,-._._. ....mZF---....-----..--
------- l~~fBpjfL---;ii~J:Jl-~- ~~or.k-~~~
---- I ~~~------=_-i-~----_----~- --
:ibJJh tv~t2:, _ ~-1.g T ..!72ait.t.t c pv. --J~!.~h~.!v.6J.t;'-€.-oJM..qLe...-~.
'JiIJTL' ,rr,<1/3 /./'>101'" ~~e.L/JNE_ _ ... ._.~~
-.. -- -~.- ~t~~!-.~~
___ .______~~_ -1= _CM.L~ _ _ ._Z~_:LIf:;____ .u_ ___ tJ-:2___ _ __ _ .
______ ..YlJ..IL!!._ti:.c _f-~-itL~L-.__~~1!.._ ;?ff:!.. ~~~~~~ <S~1. e,,_ -
____ . J 10~1!v{R._.14~Q~U_P&...J2~___._____n_________~
------- i-----..--.----..--.-.-....---- -------.------------.
,
,
4/12/2011 Item 8A
OLDE CYPRESS PUD / VITA TUSCANA RPUD
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING
VITA TUSCANA RPUD (pUDZ-PL2010-1054)
PROPOSED
/
;' I
,
. -- -', .
, :~_.'~-~-!::::=,,;,~::-~=-:,~~.;~~-,::=;:=,=,=.,~;?==:::=,=~.
--;;--- ~.
'-
l
i_c_.
'EJ.. .1
[~'~"N
I',''''''''.
L"i\lUii'i.;
..-.--..".
------.---------------.----.------..-----...-----...---_._---_._'_..-_._-_._._----._-----._._---~ ..----------.-
I..........,"' _'n_ ___
LIST OF PERMITTED USES
'.-"<.ll."..'."
-''''-'',..;,.;
~s:~~~_.~-;
PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for
other than the following:
A. Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Single-Family dwelling units.
2. Multi-Family dwelling units.
Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of
Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC).
Packet Page -380-
10/18/2010
<(
co
E
<L>
==
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
B. Accessorv Uses:
Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to:
] . Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility buildings.
2. Clubhouse/Recreation uses and facilities, for areas designated as Multi-Family on the PUD
Master Plan, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking
paths, picnic areas, recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts.
3. Gatehouse
4. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities.
5. Water management facilities.
6. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by
the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Collier County LDC.
C. Preserve Area Uses:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in
part, for the preserve area depicted on the RPUD Master Plan other than the following:
]. Passive recreational areas.
2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks.
3. Water management structures.
4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries.
5. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the
Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code
(LDC).
D.
Develooment Densitv
1. A maximum of ]25 Single-Family Residential dwelling units for all Single-Family tracts within
the Vita Tuscana RPUD.
2. A maximum of 33 Multi-Family.
3. A maximum of 158 dwelling units shall be constructed in the Residential Areas of the project.
The gross project area is 65.29 '" acres and the residential density maximum shall be 2.42 units
per acre.
10/18/2010
" -......
~J."
;~:..:....
...-.;
.
o
~ .-~
g
4/12/2011 Item 8A
EXISTING
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD (Ord. 05-65)
'~~~':':~"-:V..'-< ... /,:~::;::~.
.....'...~~ .....
;....:...1 I
~::...,...' rll""h.'
I?-='~", '
i // --~)
"l/
.---. ~-... ... "';:
-. ~"..-.---
_:.::J
<O......._..k...~ '-' 0.,._
.....,-.....i.l}',."
/
..1~:~.;" I
~
/-
t
.,;~:;"':.. "
ti~
~
( ".' ':.0'
~
y-".,. "-~)J
.....- ~-
,'''.2 ".1
~.."
. '-'.' ~'J
I.... 'e...
(:-~ ..~_~__f~.:"_'""~~.__~~_.~.':...~,.J:.. ,=~.
I
.,....--.
.....1 0..
--.........
''''''
6
,;'.
?
......~
ILl). (x-vclopmclll PUD
Cullh:r C-uunl)'. Floriilit
._....-..~.....
~
;>.!.~o SHNIO"D COUIII
"IAP\n. F)(UI.f).o. _\.'1~
P''?t.l!.(1J'll..)l~JJJ
,"-" (~.t'.J) 4oJ. l/!?Il
C b 'r..... 01< l!;l, '~~2
LIST OF PERMITTED USES
3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
l'rlllC-1:1l.oClIlllull
.\ -~ ,.......
-',! f
_:. ..1...
!'
,!
.....1.10>"............
~..,,-.......
I
.
~;
o.
,
,
~ l-..--~~..... '1" ,
r-':::l , (''; \' .,"'. ~-:~-
I I-~ -~-, 'j' '/"'1
-L. I .'+=,~I "-"\::'-;:' ~==,.-
-- W.J.:.=::~~_S-..-J -"'-
",,--=_..1 ,,=._'.
~'iir="-'
M:C"'~:
....rwr$I'I'..'.-.:'IoOUl.It-l-lI"I.QI"t.~II._\;!I/.ur
'i"CCltQ<< 2.1. l'tM'-$...... .a ~. lU.~Q: 2~ to'S'l. u:~~ J>oE ~.Jl"
Ic.I 'UT ''''-IItOO'.l""C,IoIIOIIt''''ICllfo;..lltNCWOl''.'.Oflu...
'IIf~' 1/~ 01" ~c"'rs< '/7 ~ ,..r sa"'"...., 'I' or '>oE'
~~l 1/4.:iCCTo:lN 21. 'nO''- 408 S. ~ t. (. COal'"
.;-
i:.~'n..aor>..~~ t'4C:iJ[~. W ~ ~Ch:N 2:1,
~IG ~T01Ao o.r~...to.. .If'" A::ltti, IIOlItUl U:~
fl:11~-"11m.:"-_J.;1UI .11M ....k....~
.~H..."8. &.1 ..~ "~;,;l
fI>a.._..t 48 ~. "_1
......._.oIonoCI IIl.S.04(U~1
1.aIo. 4.1 ..~ (9X)
l_...... "- 1$..4 ~ CS~1
............ .l.t.LAL1IW
o,:....~........ 35.7".(71")
,...... ~IM
........O(II;(lIl)
Exhibit" A"
PUD MASTER PLAi\
"
'I)/~/G:>
The maximum number of residential dwelling units within the PUD shall be 104
units. The maximum number of residential dwellina units within Tracts 1 and 2
shall be 71 units.
Packet Page -382-
10/18/2010
<(
00
E
Q)
==
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
3.3 PERMITTED USES
No building. structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used. in whole or part. for other than the following:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Single-family dwellings in Tracts 1 and 2
2. SiRgle bmily swsllin5lG iRslbldinFj att::asA9s iSlRa zsrs let liRe l;;.IFlitt in
+Fa;;I~.
6. 2. Multi-family dwellings in Tract 3 oniy (includes townhouses and
garden apartments).
4., 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units.
I>, 4. Gatehouse.
e., 5. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses,
consistent with the permitted uses of this PUD, as determined by the
Board of Zoning Appeals.
B.
Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
1 . Customary accessory uses and structures including carports,
garages, and utility buildings.
2, Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools. tennis
courts, volleyball courts. fishing docks, walking paths, picnic areas,
recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts.
10/18/2010
4/12/2011 Item SA
OIde Cypress & Vita Tuscana
Neighborhood Informational Meeting
October 18, 2010 5:30 pm@ Olde Cypress Clubhouse
Speaker: Rich Yovanovich - Coleman, Yovanovich, & Koester, P.A.
Speaker: Chris Mitchell- Waldrop Engineering, P.A.
Applicant: Brian Stock; Keith Gelder - Olde Cypress Development, L TD & Vita PIMA, LLC
Rich Yovanovich: Good evening, my name is Rich Yovanovich, I am a local attorney in Collier County
and I am one of the representatives for the applications that we are going to talk to you tonight about in
front of Olde Cypress. With me tonight are several people: Brian Stock, Stock Development, the
developer of Olde Cypress as well as Vita Tuscana, Keith Gelder with Stock Development in charge of
the entitlement process for Stock Development, Chris Mitchell with Waldrop Engineering the project
engineer. Two representative form Collier County that are reviewing our projects are with us today
Nancy Gunlach who is reviewing the Olde cypress PUDA, and Kay Deselem who is reviewing the Vita
Tuscana RPUD as well as the proposed Amendment to the OIde Cypress DRI.
We are required to have a Neighborhood Informational Meeting under the county's process and required
to record the meeting, summary meetings, provide minutes, and provide a tape of the meeting to the
county. It would be helpful when you ask questions if you could speak you name so we can get it on the
tape and not talk over each other. We have a couple of different petitions that I'll walk you through and
answer any questions you may have regarding the petitions. It's probably better if you let me speak
about all three of them because they are all intertwined.
In front of the Olde Cypress community, there is a cleared area that was cleared by the previous
developer. It is approximately 46 parcel that has been zoned the HD Development PUD. That property
has been acquired by one of Brian's Stock's entity, Vita PIMA, LLC. Along with another 18 acres
immediately to the west of the property. It is approximately a 64 acres property that we are in for a
rezone of the existing HD Development PUD to the Vita Tuscana RPUD. The existing HD Development
PUD was approved for 104 units (71 single family homes and 33 multifamily units). We are adding 18
acres to the project and requesting a total project density of 158 units and increasing the 71 SF to 125
SF. We are not touching the 33 MF units approved in the original HD development PUD. Brian's
(Stock's) group doesn't own that parcel, so we are not changing the density. So that will remain the
same.
The first petition that we are going through the process is an amendment to the HD Development PUD.
To rename it, to add the 18 acres, and to allow for 125 SF and 33 MF units. We are allowing for the
ability to build two story SF homes, which is different from the original HD Development PUD. The
minimum size of the homes must be at least 1,600 SF. There is some product that Stock is building in
Lely Resort project that requires a 5 foot side yard setback, so we are trying to bring that product here.
The change will be from a 6 foot side yard setback to a 5 foot side yard setback. So, that is the first
petition that we are going through.
The second petition that we are pursuing is an amendment to the Olde Cypress PUD. The OIde Cypress
PUD was originally approved the mid-1980s. When it was approved, it was approved for over 1,300
residential units. This was the original master plan approved in the PUD. The original project was
supposed to have the project access on the east side of the project, not where the current access is on the
west side as it is today. In 1996, when we got through the environmental permitting with the SFWMD
1/29/201 I
Packet Page -384-
<(
co
E
QJ
-
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
and the Army Corps or Engineers, a new master plan was approved for the project and the project
density was reduced. All of the development that was formerly on the east side of the project was
removed, including the reference to two parcels that comprised of 3.9 acre parks and natural trails that
were referred to n the PUD document. In the new PUD master plan, you can see all the development
went away on the east side, and unfortunately within the PUD text the reference to the park was not
deleted. The 3.9 acre park remained in the text of the PUD document. The purpose that we are going
through this amendment is to delete the reference to the 3.9 acre park and walking trails in the text. We
are also reducing the project density originally approved for 1,100, subtracting out 158 units - which is
the same number of units for the Vita Tuscana PUD.
The third petition is an amendment to the aIde Cypress DR!. When the aIde Cypress DR! was
approved, it was ultimately approved for 1,100 residential units. We are adding in the Vita Tuscana 64
acres into the Olde Cypress DR! and keeping the and keeping the aIde Cypress DR! density at 1,100.
The way we are able to do that is to subtract 158 units from the aIde Cypress PUD to make up the
difference. So, the third petition that we are asking for is to add the Vita Tuscana land, not increase the
density, and add in the Vita Tuscana project.
Those are the three petitions that are winding their way through the county's process. I don't know when
our CCPC hearing will be for the three projects. We are hoping that it will be sooner than later to get
them done and we'll are coordinating with Kay and Nancy to get them done. Our goal is to have them
done while we are in season while people are here. The sooner the better so the developer to move
forward with marketing for the Vita Tuscana project. That is an overview of what we are proposing on
the three petitions. I'd be happy to answer any questions on any of the three petitions.
Resident: Ok. First of all, I will limit my set of questions just to the first petition. You indicated that the
units and 33 of those to be MF located additional on the 1.5 acres that Stock has yet to purchase. How
can you get permission to build homes on property you don't yet own? Secondly, if you were to buy it,
will Stock guarantee that the MF will not access to and from Treeline Drive. Finally, if Mr. Stock
doesn't buy that piece of land, can the 33 MF units be built in the remaining acreage for the Vita
Tuscana project.
Rich Y ovanovich: The answer to your question is that we are not asking for any changes to the MF
parcel. We don't own it and don't have the right to make changes. We are not asking for the right to
build on the 1.42 acres because that right already exists under the HD Development PUD. The existing
zoning on this property is roughly from here (pointing) west. As you can see, there is a preserve area
between the parcels, so the ability to access the MF from Treeline Drive will not happen. The permitting
is complete and access to Treeline Drive from MF will not happen. To answer you last question, the
most recent draft PUD we've submitted does not include MF in the Vita Tuscana project area, so that
use would not be allowed.
Resident: In the last meeting we had, I thought I heard Brian Stock, or one of his representatives,
indicate that although the MF units are in the PUD, there was not any intention of building MF units.
Now, it seems as if there is a plan on the MF. I'd like to know exactly what the plans are relative to the
MF.
Rich Yovanovich: I don't think that is what was said at the meting. I think what was said was that this
roughly 1.5 acre site was where the MF product would probably go and that Brian (Stock) has no control
over that. I believe the commitment was that there would be no MF in the area I just described as SF, so
I don't think anything has changed since the last meeting regarding commitments. Obviously, we can't
1/29/2011
4/12/2011Item8.A.
commit to anything on the MF since we don't own it. It is already entitled piece of property under the
existing HD Development PUD. But as far as constructing MF in this SF area, the PUD document
doesn't allow MF in that area.
Resident: Whets the definition of MF for the purposes of the 1.5 acres?
Rich Y ovanovich: The definition that the county has for MF I believe is three or more units in one
building. So if you have 3 or more units in one building, that is considered MF.
Resident: How tall?
Rich Y ovanovich: Under the PUD document, it is 42 feet - 3 stories.
Resident: You mentioned that there would be 2 story buildings in the SF area?
Rich Y ovanovich: Yes - we are asking for the ability to build 2 story SF homes.
Resident: We are being told it would be single story, single family homes. They also mentioned specific
models. Somewhere there is incorrect information.
Rich Yovanovich: The PUD document that we've submitted allows for 2-story SF homes, with a
minimum of 1,600 SF. I don't recall the discussion of a height commitment at the previous meeting.
Brian (Stock) has stated the majority of the homes will be single story.
Resident: What were we told before?
Brian Stock: I don't ever remember making a commitment that there wouldn't be two story homes. We
plan to offer three different product lines; four of the five floor plans in each product are single story.
The majority of our customers in the past have selected single story floor plans. Again, I don't ever
remember making a commitment that there wouldn't be two story homes.
Resident: The product line that you are talking about - what Lely comparable communities would you
compare it to?
Brian Stock: Martinique, Caldecott, & Cottesmore
Resident: Just some clarifications. Brian Stock doesn't own the 1.42 acre MF site?
Rich Yovanovich: Correct.
Resident: Are you negotiating to purchase the property?
Brian Stock: No.
Resident: Is it owned by some other developer?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes. It is owned by some other developer.
1/29/2011
Packet Page -386-
Resident: What I don't understand is why amend the PUD on property that he doesn't own, isn't going
to own, belongs to someone else, and will continue to be MF.
Rich Yovanovich: We are not amending that portion of the PUD document. We are only amending the
portion of the PUD document that applies to the SF homes. There are 71 SF homes approved in the HD
Development PUD. We are adding the 18 acres adjacent to the PUD to create a unified SF community.
In doing that, we're going from 71 SF to 125 SF. The only other alternative is that if we don't amend the
PUD is to develop the 18 acres as a stand alone project. An 18 acre parcel under the county's Urban land
use designation we'd be entitled to build up to 72 total units (18 acres x 4 units/acre). It's more difficult
to develop an 18 acre parcel as single family homes. So, the reality is that if this parcel was developed
separately; it would probably be developed as multi-family product. So, the thought process was to add
<( the 18 acres to the HD Development PUD to continue on with the concept of single family development.
CX)
E Resident: Is this development going to be built as spec or purchase?
Q)
......
.,- Brian Stock: Purchase.
.,-
o
~ Resident: How long do you expect this development to last? Several years?
N
.,-
--
"<t Brian Stock: Hopefully the faster the sales pace will allow us to finish the community within three
years or less, but we can't control the customers.
Resident: Is the sole access to this community through the main gate?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes. Just as it was when HD Development had the property. That hasn't changed.
Resident: One clarification. You mentioned there was originally 6 foot setbacks for Vita Tuscana.
Rich Yovanovich: The original setbacks for the HD Development PUD was 6 feet. We are requesting
to change that to 5 feet.
Resident: Because the side yard setbacks in aIde Cypress are 7.5 feet minimum. So that is quite a
difference. I just want to clarifY. The original project was not supposed to be part of our community.
Rich Yovanovich: The original HD Development was a separate PUD.
Resident: Can you explain the basis of the interpretation on the mapping changes and the removal of the
park from the written documents?
Rich Yovanovich: You have to go back and read the DRl document that references the parks. The DRl
document specifically identifies where the two park parcels would be and it references them in the far
northeast corner near the cypress area and intermediate MF property. So there were two parcels, 1.7 and
2.2 acres combined make up the 3.9 acre park in the original DRl document. So, the exact location was
identified in the DR! document. When we came back and went through the process later and determined
that none of the development referenced in the DR! document no longer existed on the master plan.
(because they were cross-referenced). It's my belief is that the county took care of the major issue, but
missed the minor issue in the PUD, which was the PUD reference to the park. It was just missed as they
were going through the process. It should have been deleted - just like the development density that was
in that area was actually deleted - as the amendment occurred in 1996 to the PUD document and the DRl
1/29/20 II
4/12/2011/tem 8A
document. Then there is a reference that says if there are any inconsistencies between the original
approval and the new approval in 1996 that the new approval prevails. Well, the original document
references a park in the northeast corner which is clearly inconsistent with the new approval. So I just
think it was missed through the process and that's why we're deleting the reference to the 3.9 acres.
Resident: I believe 2 or 3 years ago, you were the individual that presented where the 3.9 acre park was
going to go and there was some discussion about taking down part of the driving range - is that correct?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes.
Resident: If what you are saying is the truth, then why was there any effort to put a park in? Why was
there discussion about it? Why was there a plan if there was no need for it?
Rich Yovanovich: There was an attempt by the developer to give people a park that frankly they didn't
have to give you. But in doing so, it was clearly not well received. I remember very clearly it being an
unpopular decision on where to locate the 3.9 acres. We tried to fit it within the confines of the existing
Olde Cypress project because, as you know, Olde Cypress is essentially built out. We couldn't find a
location that was acceptable to everyone. So now we have to clean it up, because it's still there. People
are still asking about the 3.9 acre park. It's our positions the 3.9 acre park is not an obligation so we are
trying to clean up the documents so we can put this issue to bed. Because until the reference to the 3.9
acre park reference comes out of the PUD, people are going to continue to ask where it is.
Resident: When people bought homes and Stock Realty was discussing the features that were to occur
in the parks - do you have any concerns on liability?
Rich Yovanovich: I'm going to focus tonight's conversation on the changes that affect the PUD
document. I'm not here to have a liability discussion. I'm here to talk about the PUD and the park....
Resident: Same question.
Rich Y ovanovich: The history of the entitlements does not require a park.
Resident: Basically, getting back to the questions that were just asked, based on the research and
investigation I've done over the last two months - I spoke to approximately 17 county planners, lawyers,
representatives, etc - I must respectfully disagree. In my opinion, that the fact that indeed those parks are
located in the remote northeastern boundary were removed for the purposes of the remoteness and that
they were preserves, in no way relieve the developer of the obligation to develop those parks and nature
trails elsewhere in the 538 acres that they have yet to complete development on. And the reference that
'they have been removed from the diagram, therefore, we no longer have an obligation' I would like to
quote from the PUD 9.02B Section 9 - General Development Commitments - "the design criteria and
layout illustrated from the Master Plan and development plan shall be understood as flexible to comply
with all technical requirements and best use natural resources". Accordingly, I'm sorry I for one am
going to go to the Planning Commission with my research and to the County Council and ask them to
please reconsider. I respectfully suggest that he does indeed still have the obligation and can satisfy that
by putting the parks and a limited nature trail in Vita Tuscana as it becomes an extended part of the Olde
Cypress PUD
1/29/2011
Packet Page -388-
<l:;
co
E
(])
....
.,-
.,-
o
N
--
N
.,-
--
"""
Resident: I would like to come back to the timeline of the DRI changes. You indicated that two
documents were changed - the DRI and a drawing that changed? What were the dates on those
documents?
Rich Yovanovich: The amendment that changed the Master Plan was in 1996. The original DRI was
approved in 1986. In 1986, this (pointing) was the DRI Master Plan. In the Master Plan, you can see the
original location of the parks in the northeast comer. Interestingly enough, you couldn't ever access the
park without going through the proposed MF development and through the preserve to get to the park
areas.
Resident: There was an amendment to the DRI done to remove the development and park - when did
that occur?
Rich Yovanovich: 1996. The map was changed at the same time. The main access was to the right
(east). The county was then proposing to extend 951 all the way up along the east side of the project.
The main access was to be on the east.
Resident: Are you suggesting that the Amendment and the map were changed at the same time?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes - they were done at the same time. There was a reduction of project density and
the removal of the park areas that occurred in 1996. Both were changes at the same time.
Resident: In 2007, when you were standing up here taking bullets, why didn't you say that at that time?
Rich Y ovanovich: Because at that time, we were hoping that you would accept an alternative plan. If I
would have had my druthers, I would have said you not entitled.
Resident: We live on Treeline Drive and according to the map that you handed out, it looks like edge of
the property ends at about the fourth MF west of the driveway?
Rich Y ovanovich: There is no MF on this plan.
Resident: Is this MF (pointing to SF area)?
Rich Yovanovich: No. Those are different single family products.
Resident: So, the colored portions is what Stock owns?
Rich Yovanovich: Correct.
Resident: The dark green is what?
Rich Yovanovich: Preserve.
Resident: Preserve and SF\VMD flow way? Is that set in stone?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes. It is permitted.
Resident: Never to be touched? Because when it rains, we get 4-5 feet of water.
1/29/2011
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Rich Y ovanovich: Correct.
Resident: What are we doing with the property highlighted in white?
Rich Yovanovich: It is MF.
Resident: Is it close to the Dunkin Donuts to the east?
Rich Yovanovich: Yes.
Resident: How do you change the zoning on someone else's land?
Rich Yovanovich: We are not changing anything. We are not changing the development standards on
the MF.
Resident: You said it was zoned ag?
Rich Yovanovich: That is the 18 acres next to the cleared land.
Resident: Will the SF development be required to be social members of the club?
Brian Stock: Yes. They will be required to be social members.
Resident: The MF section...are any arrangements to be made for them to be part of the club?
Rich Yovanovich: No. There has been no discussion.
Resident: As far as landscaping - will that be the same quality as aide Cypress?
Rich Y ovanovich: Yes. It will be consistent with aide Cypress. The goal of the project is to have a nice
SF development at the entrance of Olde cypress.
Resident: So they will this community be considered part of aide Cypress - not a separate
neighborhood?
Rich Yovanovich: Essentially, I guess so. Yes. From a practical standpoint - yes.
Resident: Can you give me an explanation between the red and yellow colors on the site plans?
Rich Y ovanovich: They are all single family. The red is 50' lots and the orange is 60' lots.
Resident: What are the security plans from Immokalee Road once this is all cleared to protect us in
aide Cypress?
Rich Yovanovich: The canal and a perimeter landscape berm adjacent to the canal between Vita
Tuscana and Immokalee Road.
1/29/20 II
Packet Page -390-
<(
CX)
E
Q)
~
..-
..-
o
N
--
N
..-
--
'<t
Resident: Fundamentally thought, you could walk right down the asphalt path and walk into Vita
Tuscana?
Rich Y ovanovich: Yes, I guess you could.
Resident So this is no longer a gated community0
Rich Yovanovich: We'll need to talk about (security)?
Resident: So, this is already not a gated community since you can walk down Logan Blvd and walk
right in to Strada Bella.
Resident: My name is Gary Lusher. I've been part of this community for several years since 2002.
Obviously, the request for the establishment is gro'wth which is totally understandable and a welcome
addition to the community. But I was at the 2008 meeting and meetings before that. 1 think you realize
there was an expectation of a park. What is the benefit to the homeowners and the community of Olde
Cypress in not objecting to the elimination of the park and nature trails? What's the benefit to the
homeowners?
Rich Yovanovich: The benefit to the Olde Cypress community is that you will get this development at
your entrance. A 125 SF community vs. the original 71 unit project with 33 MF and a separate 18 acre
MF project at your entrance. You will get a higher quality project at your entrance. At the meeting two
weeks ago, there was discussion not related to the re-zone documents about enhanced landscaping that
will occur at the entry and additions to the clubhouse/fitness center areas that are all hand in hand in
addressing what some people perceive as the loss of a park. There is going to enhancements to the
fitness center, landscaping, and a much nicer development in our opinion than what could have been
there had Brian (Stock) not made a commitment to buy this project and build SF rather than letting it go
to another developer who could have built up to 72 MF units. We believe that tradeoff more than
enhances the value of the Olde Cypress community's perceived loss of a 3.9 acres park.
Resident: Excuse me. What is the value you put on these improvements and what value do you put on a
3.9 acre park. What is the value of getting a environmental park and nature trails? What dollar value?
Rich Y ovanovich: You are asking appraisal issues that I cannot answer.
Resident: At the last meeting, you said it was $100,000.
Rich Yovanovich: Well, the landscaping we are proposing is more than $100,000, the fitness center
improvements are doubling the size of the facility, and there is a lot of money related to that. Are you
asking an exact value?
Resident: So swapping 3.9 aces of park and the elimination of nature trails for a couple hundred
thousand dollars?
From the crowd: 1 don't think that is correct. 1 don't think you are doing this to swap out the park.
You're doing this to enhance our properties in here and help you develop your property which would be
a tremendous enhancement to the community as a whole (applause)
Rich Yovanovich: Yes ma'am
1/29/2011
4/12/2011/tem8.A.
Resident: I just want to say that some people in the meeting in 2007 spoke out against the park and I
just want to say that it doesn't represent the entire community. We have a lot of valuable space out here
where we can see nature, we have the preserves. I don't see any value in the addition of the park and I'm
glad Brian Stock is developing this property (applause)
Resident: I just want to comment. Thank you for your reference on want vs. want. I want to know what
is the benefit to aide Cypress? As I understand, it is an enhancement to our community, the club, as well
as intrinsic improvements to show progress on Treeline Drive. You've answered my question.
Rich Yovanovich: Yes sir.
Resident: I was finished until you mentioned the fact that the fitness center is basically part of the
enhancement package - and it certainly is. And tangibly it will benefit us all. I've been here since 2003.
That fitness center was discussed in 2005, before Mr. Stock had anything to do with Vita Tuscana. That
fitness center - and I go there every day - is the smallest, most ill equipped, and frankly embarrassing
fitness center in all of North Naples. I think in a depressed housing market it would be wise for any
developer to improve that because it is an eyesore - so it can help him (and us) develop homes in Vita
Tuscana. But to say that if he wasn't going to development Vita Tuscana is adequate for the remaining
466 of us. It's never been adequate. I would think it would be something a responsible developer would
have done long ago after the sales center was moved from that area. So, I am impressed wit the new
sales center and I think it will be excellent. However, I think it was due to us long before Vita Tuscana
ever came up.
Resident: Assuming the amendments shall past and construction occurs, this will be a multi-year project
correct? Since it is at the entrance of aIde Cypress and there will be a lot of activity and construction-
what if any plans are there to deal with a major construction area at our entrance. Screens, berms, etc.
The construction will happen but it will also be pretty visible for people coming into the area. Is there
anything you can do to modifY that?
Keith Gelder: Obviously, there will be a lot of construction activity. You've already got an existing
landscape buffer at the entrance to the community. It's something we'll have to coordinate and address.
It's something that we've been discussing lately how to manage that. Dump truck going through the
front gate - it's something we'll coordinate. Is there anything that we can do at the driving range _
cutting through before the gate, or after the gate? It's something we'll have to work through. We are
responsible on all of our Lely Resort projects in terms of screening, cleanliness, and managing our
jobsites. It's something that we are cognizant of and work through.
Resident: I wasn't concerned about the details. I was mainly looking forward to a commitment from
you to do whatever you can to minimize the construction.
Keith Gelder: Absolutely. We'll have to manage our jobsites.
Resident: I have a related question that has to do with a security concern. With that the open area not
being gated or bermed - lots of people will be coming into and construction workers, etc.
Keith Gelder: What we've always done on our jobsites is have a gated construction access. We'll take
measures to restrict access the best we can. We'll take appropriate measures along Immokalee Road as
well.
1/29/2011
Packet Page -392-
<(
ex)
E
Q)
.....
.,...-
.,...-
o
N
--
N
.,...-
--
'<t
Resident: Is the current owner of this property the same owner of the property Longshore?
Rich Yovanovich: No. Totally different property.
Resident: Who owns this?
Rich Yovanovich: Vita PIMA, LLC. Brian Stock.
Resident: Could somebody explain the difference of numbers - the Olde Cypress web site states there
'will be a low density environment of650 homes to give you the ultimately luxury of space'. If you take
650 and subtract 426, then the 125 SF of Vita Tuscana, that leaves 99 open SF units somewhere. Is
there a discrepancy and the number you have here? The Olde Cypress website states 650 homes - just
in our community. If you take the numbers - they don't add up. It gives you an additional 99 units. The
MF are not part of Olde Cypress. There are 99 possible units according to this (website). What is the
discrepancy? It's off the 01de Cypress website.
Rich Yovanovich: The 01de Cypress PUD was approved for 1,100. We are removing 158 units to take
it to 942 units. That's what is approved in the zoning. I'm not sure what the website says.
Resident: The Stock Olde Cypress website says 650 SF homes.
Rich Yovanovich: That was prior to adding this 64 acres...
Resident: I'm saying that in Olde Cypress there are 426 homes. Add 125, that's 551 - a difference of99
units. I'm questioning where they might be coming in.
Brian Stock: I understand what you're saying. As far as the numbers aren't adding up, we'll have to
take another look at that.
Steve DeAngelis: That information was put on the website was by the original board. It may be
outdated. We'll have to update it.
Resident: This is not the Olde Cypress Master website. I'm saying this is the Stock Olde Cypress
web site.
Rich Y ovanovich: Any other comments?
Resident: Someone asked the question the berm on lmmokaleeand whether that would compromise our
community and whether we are, in reality, a gated community. It seems it was not answered. Can you
answer that concern?
Rich Y ovanovich: Right now the HD development calls for a landscape berm and buffer along
Immokalee Road. That same concept is being carried on for the additional 18 acres. So, there is no
changes in the access to the community form what was previously approved.
Resident: We presently live in a gated community with certain security.
Rich Yovanovich: Unless it is gated all the way around?? We are not changing the accessibility.
1/29/2011
4/12/2011Item8.A.
Resident: But if you can walk in off Immokalee Road?
Brian Stock: We are going to have to do some type of fence or security structure on Immokalee Road.
At a minimwn we'll have a security fence.
Rich Y ovanovich: Let us get back to you regarding security - fencing or not fencing.
Resident: I would appreciate if you could get back to us.
Rich Yovanovich: We will let your association know.
Resident: One fInal question - the issue of the park. There has been an evolution of understanding
whether the park issue was a legal obligation or wasn't an obligation. Stock trying to alleviate the issue.
I believe that it wasn't voluntary unless there was a legal obligation. I still would hope that we as
residents and also Stock can clarify to the Commission or Planning Representative what the legal
requirements or obligations of Stock are relative to the park. We've heard it was a requirement, not a
requirement, somebody mentioned it was an administrative oversight. That makes no sense to me. It's
hard to believe. I would like for all parties to understand exactly what the legal aspects are with respect
to. So we don't spin our wheels speculating.
Rich Yovanovich: Let's just cut to the chase, we believe that this project and the improvements to the
entrance more than offset the obligation to build a park. We can go back and forth all we want. We don't
believe we have the obligation. We believe the proposed plan of development more than offsets the
obligation of a park. I think there is probably a difference of opinion. Unless there is anything new, I
would like to thank everyone for coming.
***END OF MEETING***
1/29/2011
Packet Page -394-
<(
co
E
a.>
-
...--
...--
o
N
--
N
...--
--
"""
Co~T County
- """--.:;...--. ~
4/12/2011 Item 8A
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
~isclosure of Interest Information
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
% of Ownership
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address
% of Ownership
Revised May2010
Packet Page -396-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Co~T County
-- ~-- -
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI
PLANNING AND REGULATION
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358
www.collierQov.net
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address % of Ownership
See Attachment 1
I
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
i Name and Address % of Ownership
i
i
r
I
,
I
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
I Name and Address
,
i
i
,
:
Revised May20 I (j
Packet Page -397-
GENERAL PARTNER
STOCK DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Brian K. Stock
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
Kenneth Stock
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
Bob Imig
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
Chad Kocses
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
LIMITED PARTNER
4/12/2011 Item 8A
ATTACHMENT 1
% of Ownership
50%
50%
OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
% of Ownership
Brian K. Stock
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
Kenneth Stock
2647 Professional Circle, Suite 1201
Naples, FL 34119
50%
50%
Packet Page -398-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
,
",411,.
/' . ""co
~ ~
I [-DEll. ~
ta Im:nlm ~
~ ILWIW :
~"'" Q! AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
~~I%IJ1."''' COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,'
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE.
ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION, REQUESTING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE HD DEVELOPMENT PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DOCUMENT AND
MASTER PLAN BY: REVISING THE MINIMUM
SINGLE-FAMILY LOT AREAS FROM 12,000 AND 6,000
SQUARE FEET TO 9,000 SQUARE FEET; REVISING
THE MINIMUM INTERIOR LOT WIDTHS FROM 85
FEET AND 55 FEET TO 60 FEET; REVISING THE
MINIMUM CORNER LOT WIDTHS FROM 95 FEET AND
65 FEET TO 65 FEET; PROJECT OWNERSHIP TO
RECOGNIZE THE CURRENT O\VNER; REMOVING
ATTACHED AND ZERO-LOT LINE DWELLING UNITS
AS PERMITTED USES; REQUIRING ADDITIONAL
LANDSCAPING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PUD,
FOR THE SUI3JECT PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF
IMMOKALEE ROAD, EAST OF OLDE CYPRESS
BOULEV ARD, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TREELINE
DRIVE. IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF 46.64'" ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 03-30, THE
FORMER liD DEVELOPMENT PUD; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE NO. 05- ~
WHEREAS, Empire Developers Group, LLC, represented by Laura Spurgeon of Johnson
Engineering, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the subject property, per Petition Number PUDA-2005-AR-7557.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
SECTION ONE:
The Zoning Classification of the subject property located in Section 21, Township 48
South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida, as described in Section 1.2 of the attached HD
Development Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Document and Master Plan is
amended to revise the minimum single-family lot areas from 12,000 and 6,000 square feet to
9,000 square feet; revise the minimum interior lot widths from 85 feet and 55 feet to 60 feet;
revise the minimum corner lot widths from 95 feet and 65 feet to 65 feet; to reflect the changes
in project ownership; to remove "attached" and "zero-lot line" dwelling units as permitted uses;
and, to require additional landscaping on the north side of the PUD.
Packet Page -399-
- -
Packet Page -400-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
, .
, ,
-.... .
.....~~\ t::'; r" . "
."
,,",
,,',
. "\
rlJtm,1"1l . I
W rUll.ul "/
", ;
'/
4/12/2011 Item 8A
Development must be made in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A," which is incorporated by reference such that the appropriate zoning atlas map or
maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land
Development Corle, are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance Number 03-30, known as the HD Development PUD, adopted on June 24,
2003, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its
entirety and replaced with these provisions.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADQPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ,5 day of NoVe.tM. be", ,2005.
ATTEST:
DWIGHTE. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
,''";.';Il~~ .tJ~
,~:'.;. ';" ..:.. ""::':~
n1A::iiS,,'j ~ Of ,
?At~U~::'.~ _ "
'.' .~.tur...11
~J$f~
Patrick G. wi-te
Assistant County Attorney
BY:
"'/L.~!Ai ~
FRED W. COYLE, IAlRMAN
PUDA-2005-AR-7557n-\W/sp
c.
Packet Page -401-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
H.D. DEVELOPMENT RPUD
A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PREPARED FOR:
DAVID A. CUSTER, MANAGER
H.D. Di'lL/iOPMI!NT, llC
HB45 FRIPP ISlAND COURT
NAPLES, FlORID.!\ 34119
EMPIRE DEVELOPERS GROUP. LLC
5660 STRAND COURT
NAPLES. FL 34110
ORIGINALLY PREPARED BY:
WILLIAM L. HOOVER, AICP
HOOVER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B-1
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105
and
DAVID WILLEMS, PE
JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.
2158 JOHNSON STREET
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33901
AMENDED BY:
JOHNSON ENGINEERING. INC.
2350 STANFORD COURT
NAPLES. FL 34104
DATE FILED
DATE REVISED
DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC
DATE APPROVED BY BCC 11-15-2005
PREVIOUS ORDINANCE NUMBER 03.30
AMENDED BY 2005-65
EXHIBIT "A"
Packet Page -402-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ii
Iii
1
2
4
2 +-
11 ~
12 ~
LIST OF EXHIBITS
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN
SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS PLAN
SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
11
Packet Page -403-
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "D"
4/12/2011 Item 8A
LIST OF EXHIBITS
PUD MASTER PLAN
PUD CONCEPTUAL UTILlTY/WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
NORTH BUFFER DIAGRAM
Hi
Packet Page -404-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development of approximately 46.64:t acres of property in Collier County, as a
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) to be known as the H.D. Development
RPUD, will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as
set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The residential facilities of the
H.D. Development RPUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development
regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons:
1. The subject property's location, in relation to existing or proposed community
facilities and services, f3ermitEl the EleveI9f3R'19nt'c reci8eRtial 88RElity aEl 88ssris9Q
iff is consistent with Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element.
2. The project development is compatible with and complimentary to surrounding
land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element.
3. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the
Collier County Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future
Land Use Element.
4. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage
features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in
Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element.
5. The Project is located within an Urban Residential Mixed Use designation of the
Future Land Use Element: the Urban Residential Subdistrict. The projected
density of 2.23 dwelling units per acre is in compliance with the Future Land Use
Element of the Growth Management Plan based on the following relationships to
required criteria:
Base Densitv
Maximum Permitted Density
4 dwellina units/acre
4 dwelling units/acre
Maximum permitted units'" 46.64 acres x 4 dwelling units/acre'" 186 units.
Requested dwelling units '" 1 04, which results in a requested density of
2.23 dwelling units/acre.
6. All final local development orders for this Project are subject to Division ~
6.02.00, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development
Code.
Packet Page -405-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
SECTION I
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the
property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be
developed under the Project name of the H.D. Development RPUD.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The subject property being 46.641 acres, is comprised of 3 separate parcels that
are located in Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, and are fully described as:
A. The West half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, less the south 100 feet thereof,
Collier County, Florida.
B. The West half of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
C. The East half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
21, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, subject to
existing restrictions and reservations of record.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
A. The subject property is owned by:
D:Jvid .^.. Custor, M:Jnaging Partner, H.D. DevelElI3Rlont, LLC, 14845 Fripp
Isl3nd Court, ~bpl8E;, Florida 31119.
Empire Developers Group. LLC. 5660 Strand Court. Naples. FL 34110 and
Richard B. and Amv L. Melson. 5660 Strand Court. Naples. FL 34110
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA
A. The subject property is located on the north side of Immokalee Road,
approximately 1.25 miles east of Oakes Boulevard, unincorporated Collier
County, Florida.
B. The entire Project site currently has Agricultural Zoning and is proposed to
be rezoned to PUD.
2
Packet Page -406-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The project site is located within the Cocohatchee River Canal drainage basin
according to the Collier County drainage atlas. The proposed outfall for the
project is the Cocohatchee Canal located north of Immokalee Road. The peak
discharge rate from the design storm will be limited 0.04 cubic feet per second/per
acre in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 90-10.
Natural ground elevation is approximately +12.0 to +14.0 NGVD. The entire site is
located within FEMA flood Zone X with no base flood elevation specified.
The water management system for the project proposes the construction of the
perimeter berm with crest elevation set at the 25-year, 3-day flood stage. Water
quality treatment is proposed in on-site lakes, swales and detention areas prior to
discharge to the Cocohatchee Canal.
Per Collier County's soil survey dated 1998, there are three types of soil found
within the limits of the property:
No. 17 - Basinger fine sand.
No. 25 - Boca, Riviera, limestone sub stratum and Copeland fine sand,
depressional
No. 27 - Pompano fine sands, depressional.
The site vegetation consists mainly ot pine and palmetto flat woods with mixed
cypress and a cypress canopy with wire grass understory. The proposed plans
are to preserve the high quality cypress slough area through the project and have
two independent development tracts in the upland and lower quality wetland areas
of the project. The site has been impacted by melaleuca and other exotics that
will be removed as part of the proposed site improvements.
1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The HD. Development RPUD is a Project comprised of a maximum of 104
residential units. Recreational facilities and other facilities and services will be
provided in conjunction with the dwelling units. Residential land uses, recreational
uses, and signage are designed to be harmonious with one another in a natural
setting by using common architecture, quality screening/buffering, and native
vegetation, whenever feasible.
1.7 SHORT TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "HD. Development Residential
Planned Unit Development Ordinance."
3
Packet Page -407-
4/12/2011 Item SA
SECTION II
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
2.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the Project plan
of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective
land uses of the tracts included in the Project, as well as other Project
relationships.
2.2 GENERAL
A. Regulations for development of the H.D. Development RPUD shall be in
accordance with the contents of this Document, PUD - Planned Unit
Development, and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County
Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the
time of issuance of any development order, to which said regulations relate
which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as, but not limited
to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan (SDP), excavation
permit and preliminary work authorization. Where these regulations fail to
provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar
district in the Land Development Code shall apply.
B. Unless otherwise required, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as
the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in
effect at the time of building permit application.
C. All applicable regulations, unless specifically waived through a variance
procedure or separate provision provided for in this PUD Document, shall
remain in full force and effect.
D. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a
concurrency review under the provisions of Division ~ 6.02.00, Adequate
Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES
A maximum of 104 dwelling units shall be constructed in the Residential Areas of
the project. The gross project area is 46.64:t acres yielding a residential density of
2.23 units per acre. Tracts 1 and 2 toqether are limited to a total of 71 dwellina
units.
2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
A. The general configuration of the land uses are illustrated graphically on
Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, which constitutes the required PUD
4
Packet Page -408-
4/12/2011 Item SA
Development Plan. Any division of the property and the development of
the land shall be in compliance with the PUD Master Plan, Division ~
10.02.00, S~edivisi9ns. of the Land Development Code, and the platting
laws of the State of Florida.
B. The provisions of Division ~ 10.02.03, Site Development Plans, of the
Land Development Code, when applicable. shall apply to the development
of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided .in said Division ~
10.02.03 in effect prior to the issuance of a building permit or other
development order.
C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure
improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the
methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities.
2.5 MODEL UNITS AND SALES FACILITIES
A. In conjunction with the promotion of the development, residential units may
be designated as models. Such model units shall be governed by Section
2.6.33.15.04.04 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
B. Temporary sales trailers and construction trailers may be placed on the site
after site development plan approval and prior to the recording of
subdivision plats, subject to the requirements of Section 2.€i.J3.3 5.04.03 of
the Land Development Code.
2.6 PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL
The excavation of earthen material and its stock-piling in preparation of water
management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted, in
accordance with Section 3.2.!U.e 4.06.04 of the Land Development Code, as
amended. Off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following
conditions:
A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development
Excavation" purcu3nt to 5e8tien J.€i.f3.1.J of the L3nd Develepment Code,
whereby off-site removal shall be limited to 10% of the total volume
excavated but not to exceed 20,000 cubic yards.
B. All other provisions of Division J.€i_, pertainino to Excavation, at within the
Land Development Code shall apply.
5
Packet Page -409-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
SECTION III
RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the
Residential Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, as may be
amended pursuant to Section 5.3.
3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
The maximum number of residential dwelling units within the PUD shall be 104
units. The maximum number of residential dwellina units within Tracts 1 and 2
shall be 71 units.
3.3 PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Princioal Uses and Structures:
1. Single-family dwellings in Tracts 1 and 2
2. Single bmily awelliFlgE im;lblaing attaohed ana zere let line blFlitE: in
Tr3ct 2 only.
~ 2. Multi-family dwellings in Tract 3 only (includes townhouses and
garden apartments).
~ 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units.
&.- 4. Gatehouse.
€h 5. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses,
consistent with the permitted uses of this PUD, as determined by the
Board of Zoning Appeals.
B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures:
1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports,
garages, and utility buildings.
2. Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools, tennis
courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking paths, picnic areas,
recreation buildings, and basketball/shuffle board courts.
6
Packet Page -410-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
3. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and
maintenance facilities.
4. Water management facilities.
6. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses, consistent with the permitted uses of this PUD, as determined
by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the HD.
Development RPUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as
follows:
1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback
is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line.
2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is
measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel
is served by a platted private drive, the setback is measured from
the road easement or property line, whichever is more restrictive.
7
Packet Page -411-
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARDS
Minimum Lot Area (per unit)
Minimum Lot Width
Front Yard Setback
Side Yard Setback
1 Story
2 Story
3 Story
Rear Yard Setback
Principal Structure
Accessory Structure
PUD Boundarv Setback
Principal Structure
Accessory Structure
Lake Setback (3)
Wetland Preserve Area Setback
Principal Structure
Accessorv Structure
- Distance Between Structures
Main/Principal
I-Story
2-Story
3-Story
Accessory Structures
Maximum Heiaht
..
Principal Building
Accessory Building
Minimum Floor Area
SINGLE-FAMILY
ON TRACTS 1 & 2
12,ggg Sq. Ft.
9.000
sa: 60' I nteriar Lots (1)
9a.: 65' Corner Lots
23' (2)
6'
7-kJ' NA
NA
20' (30' adjacent to
Olde Cypress PUD)
10' (20' adjacent to
Olde Cypress PUD)
NA
NA
20'
25'
jQ
12'
* NA
NA
10'
35' with a maximum of
2 stories 1 storv
20'/Clubhouse 35'
2400 Sq. Ft.
SI~JGU! FAMilY
mJ TR,^,CT 2
€i,gag aEl. Ft.
aa' IAtGrisr l.sts (1)
ea' Cerr1sr lets
2:5' (2)
0' 8. 12' sr 9ath €i'
0' 8. 1 a' sr 9sth 7.5'
NA
4/12/2011 Item SA
MULTI-FAMILY
ON TRACT 3
NA
NA
NA
15'
7.5'
10'
12.5'
2a' (60' aBjasBAt ts 20'
0ld8 CYJ3r.ess PUg)
1 a' (2a' aBjas8At ts 10'
Olee CYJ3ress PlJD)
NA
NA
~
~
~
*
NA
W
J a' with ~ m::u<imblFFl of
2 stsries
2a''/Clubhslolse :5a'
1\'lOO SEj. Ft.
20'
10'
20'
25'
15'
20'
25'
10'
42' with a maximum of
3 stories
20'/Clubhouse 38'
650 Sq. Ft. for 1 Bedroom
900 Sq. Ft. for 2 Bedrooms
1000 Sq. Ft. for 3 Bedroom~
(1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots and lots on the inside part of curved streets by 25%.
(2) The front yard setback for side-loaded garages may be reduced to 18', with the home
remaining at 23', where the applicant demonstrates that 2 vehicles can be adequately parked on
a double-wide driveway without overhanging onto the sidewalk located at the edge of the right-of-
way.
(3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake.
Packet Page -412-
8
4/12/2011 Item 8A
B. Off-Street Parkinq and Loadinq Requirements:
Parking regulations shall be as required by Division ~.05.00 of the Land
Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application.
C. Open Space/Natural Habitat Preserve Area Requirements:
1. A minimum of sixty (60) percent open space, as described in Section
2.e.d21.02.01 of the Land Development Code, shall be provided on-
site for any residential project.
2. A minimum of 11.52 acres, 25% of the viable native vegetation, shall
be provided on-site, including both the under-story and the ground
cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible.
D. Landscapinq and Bufferinq Requirements:
1. If landscape buffers are determined to be necessary adjacent to the
wetland preserve areas, they shall be separate from those preserve
areas.
2. A twenty (20) foot Type "0" Buffer shall be provided within the
Residential Areas Tracts adjacent to Immokalee Road, a ten (10)
foot Type "A" Suffer along the westem PUD boundary, a ten (1Q)
foot Type "0" fiiyffgr ::u:ljacent to Treoline Dri'le, a ten (1Q) feet Type
"A" Buffor adjacent to tne siAgls f3mily namo on the oast sias of
Tmoline Orivo, and a fifteen (15) foot Type "S" Buffer along the
eastern side of Residential Area - Tract 3.
3. Refer to Exhibits C and 0 for enhanced landscapinq buffer required
to be provided alonq the northern PUD boundarv. The north em
PUD boundarv buffer, as referenced in Exhibit C. shall meet or
exceed Tvpe "0" plantinq standards. and shall measure at least 10
feet on the PUD prooertv. The buffer shall extend into the Olde
Cvpress PUD property UP to the existinq cart path, or to a maximum
of 10 additional feet where possible, in accordance with Exhibit D.
This landscapinq alona the northern PUD boundary shall be installed
at time of internal road construction. Remaining landscaping and
buffering shall be provided per Division 2.1. Section 4.06.00 of the
Collier County Land Development Code.
E. Architectural Standards
1. All buildings, lighting, signage, landscaping and visible architectural
infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said
unified architectural theme shall include a similar architectural design
and use of similar materials and colors throughout all of the
9
Packet Page -413-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
buildings, signs, and fences/walls to be erected within the
Residential Areas. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also
be similar in design throughout the Residential Areas.
2. All pole lighting, internal to the Residential Areas, shall be
architecturally designed and limited to a height of thirty (30) feet.
F. Siqns
Signs shall be permitted as described within Division ~5.06.00 of the
Collier County Land Development Code.
10
Packet Page -414-
4/12/2011 Item SA
SECTION IV
PRESERVE AREAS PLAN
4.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the
Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan.
4.2 PERMITTED USES
No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Passive recreational areas.
2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks.
3. Water management structures.
4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries.
5. Supplemental landscape plant;ng, screening and buffering within the
Natural Habitat Preserve Areas, may be approved after
Environmental Staff's review. All supplemental plantings within the
Preserve Areas shall be 100% indigenous native species.
6. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses, consistent with the permitted uses of this PUD, as determined
by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
II
Packet Page -415-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
SECTION V
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
5.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of
this Project.
5.2 GENERAL
All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with final site development
plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and
regulations applicable to this PUD, in effect at the time of final plat, final site
development plan approval or building permit application, as the case may be.
Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and
specifications of the official County land Development Code shall apply to this
Project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his
successor or assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this
Document.
The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the PUD Master Plan and
the regulations of this PUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications
as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in
title or assignee, is subject to the commitments within this Document.
5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN
A. Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed Development and is
conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries, or special
land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at
any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan
approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.510.02.13 of the Collier
County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to
time.
B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to
ensure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all
common areas in the Project.
12
Packet Page -416-
4/12/2011 Item SA
5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT
A site development plan shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at time
of site plan submittal. The project is expected to be completed in 1 or 2 phases.
A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits
pursuant to Section 2.7.d.410.02.13 of the Land Development Code.
B. Monitorina Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted
pursuant to Section 2.7.d.€l10.02.13 of the Collier County Land
Development Code. An affidavit of the owner of the property within the
PUD shall be submitted with the report stating that the contents of the
report are true and correct.
5.5 ENGINEERING
A. This Project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the
time final construction documents are submitted for Development approval.
B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance
with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code,
Division ;h610.02.00, Subdivisions, and Division ~10.02.03, Site
Development Plans.
5.6 WATER MANAGEMENT
A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permit,
permit modification or waiver shall be provided to Collier County at the time
of construction plans review.
B. If the project is proposing construction impacts within a Big Cypress Basin
maintained easement, the applicant shall provide a copy of the approved
SFWMD Right-of-Way Permit to Collier County during the review of the
construction plans.
C. An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed lake(s) in
accordance with DiviGion ;3.5 of the Collier County Code of Laws bafl€I
Dovelopment Code and SFWMD Rules. All road impact fees must be paid
prior to removal of material from the site.
5.7 UTILITIES
A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water
and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the Project are to be designed,
constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier
County Ordinance No. 01-57, as amended, and other applicable County
rules and regulations.
13
Packet Page -417-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
5.8 TRAFFIC
The development of this PUD shall be subject to and govemed by the following
minimum stipulations.
A. All traffic control devices and design criteria used shall be in accordance with
the Minimum Standards, as amended, and as adopted by the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT), as required by Florida Statutes -
Chapter 316, Uniform Traffic Control Law.
B. All traffic speed limit postings shall be in accordance with the minimum
standards as adopted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) -
Speed Zoning Manual, as amended, as required by Florida Statutes - Chapter
316, Uniform Traffic Control Law.
C. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all development points of
ingress and egress. Said lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the
first permanent Certificate of Occupancy (CO).
D. External and internal improvements determined by Collier County
Transportation Staff to be essential to the safe ingress and egress to the
development will not be considered for impact fee credits. All such
improvements shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first CO.
E. Road Impact Fees will be paid in accordance with applicable Collier County
Ordinances.
F. Any and all points of ingress and/or egress as shown on any and all plan
submittal(s), are conceptual in nature and subject to change as determined by
Collier County Transportation Staff. Collier County Transportation Staff
reserves the right to modify, or close any ingress and/or egress location(s)
determined to have an adverse affect on the health, safety and welfare of the
public. These include, but are not limited to, safety concerns, operational
circulation issues, roadway capacity problems.
G. Any and all median opening locations will be in accordance with the Collier
County Access Management Policy, as amended, and Land Development
Code, as amended. Median access and control will remain under Collier
County Transportation Staff's authority. Collier County Transportation Staff
reserves the right to modify or close any median opening(s) determined to
have an adverse affect on the health, safety and welfare of the public. These
include, but are not limited to, safety concerns, operational circulation issues,
roadway capacity problems.
H. Nothing in any development order will vest the right of access over and above
a right in/right out condition. Neither will the existence of a point of ingress,
14
Packet Page -418-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A
egress and/or median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any future
cause of action for damages against the County by the developer(s), its
successor(s) in title, or assignee(s).
I. The development shall be designed to promote the safe travel of all users
including pedestrians and bicyclists. The following shall be the minimum
requirements:
1. Pedestrian travel ways:
3) On local roadways sidewalks shall be a minimum of six feet in width,
b) On 80llector 3nd arterial roadways sieowalks &Ralll3e a FRiniFR~FR of
oight foot in VJidth.
2. Bicycle travel ways:
3) On local roadways bike lanes are not required. Travel lanes shall be
a minimum of twelve feet in width E:Q 3S to 3CCf.HflFROsato bisY8lisls.
b) On collootor ans 3rtorial raae'Nays, in 3dditien 10 Ihe vehicbllar travel
lanOE:, l3ike laneE: sRall bo f)FOvieod. Tho l3iko lanos E:t.Jall 130 a
minimum of foLJr fcmt in width \\~hon there is cblrb :Ins guttor :Ins fit/o
foot in width wt.Jen Ihero is no cure amI g~ltor.
3. The pedestrian and bicycle travel ways, and their interconnections, shall be
separated from vehicular traffic by a minimum distance of six feet. or three
feet for unmountable curb.
4. Pavment in lieu of 6-foot sidewalks and 4-foot bike lanes for Immokalee
Road frontaqe shall be required. The amount shall be determined utilizina
FOOT's 2004 Transportation Costs, as amended. Payment shall be
reauired prior to PPL approval.
J. The developer(s), its successor(s) in title, or assignee(s), will be responsible for
the cost of any and all traffic signal(s), at any and all development entrance(s),
when determined warranted and approved by Collier County Transportation
Staff. When warranted, upon the completion of the installation, inspection,
burn-in period, and final approval/acceptance of any and all traffic signal(s),
said traffic signal(s) shall be turned over (for ownership) to Collier County, and
will then be operated and maintained by Collier County Transportation
Operations Department. Any negotiations relevant to "fair share" payment(s),
or reimbursement(s), from any and all other neighboring developer(s)/property
owner(s), that directly benefit from said traffic signal(s), will be determined
based upon percentage of usage/impact.
] 5
Packet Page -419-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
K. The developer(s) shall provide any and all site related transportation
improvement(s) including, but not limited to, any and all necessary tum lane(s)
improvement(s) at the development entrance(s) prior to the issuance of the
first permanent CO. Said improvements are considered site related, and
therefore, do not qualify for impact fee credits. When said tum lane
improvement(s), whether left tum lane(s) and/or right turn lane(s), are
determined to be necessary, right-of-way and/or compensating right-of-way,
shall be provided in conjunction with said improvement(s), as determined by
Collier County Transportation Staff at the time of site development plan or final
subdivision plat.
L. All work within Collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of
applicable Collier County Ordinances.
M. All intemal access(es), drive aisle(s), sidewalk(s), not located within County
right-of-way, will be privately maintained by an entity created by the
developer(s), its successor(s) in title, or assignee(s).
N. Joint/shared access(es) may be required by Collier County Transportation
Staff as a condition of site development plan approval.
O. Frontage, midpoint and/or reverse frontage (backside) interconnection(s) may
be required by Collier County Transportation Staff as a condition of site
development plan approval.
P. Prior to development of any and all portion(s) of any and all development(s),
site development plan approval shall be obtained/received from Collier County
Transportation Staff.
Q. If a gate is proposed at any and/or all development entrance(s) the gates shall
be designed so as not to cause vehicles to be backed up onto any and all
adjacent roadways. The following minimum requirements shall be:
1 . The minimum throat depth from the nearest intersecting roadway
edge of pavement shall be no less than a minimum of 100 feet to the
key pad/phone box for the proposed gate(s).
2. A turn-around area of sufficient width and inside turning radii shall be
provided between the aforementioned key pad/phone box and the
proposed gate(s).
R. The Tract 3, Multifamily Residential Area, shall not access to or from Treeline
Drive.
S. To minimize the overall effects of construction traffic on the aide Cvpress
neiqhborhood. construction related traffic. includinq. but not limited to earth
movinq equipment and dump trucks. but specificallv not includinq pick-up
16
Packet Page -420-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
trucks. shall on Iv access the proiect site throuoh the Cocohatchee canal
maintenance easement. subiect to South Florida Water Manaoement District
permittina. If the canal maintenance easement access is not permitted. the
construction related traffic. includina. but not limited to earth movina eauioment
and dumo trucks. but specificallv not includina oick-uo trucks. shall onlv access
the oroiect site throuah a construction access entered from Treeline Drive
throuah prooerty owned bv Empire Developers Group LLC (Folio Number
00186760002) and across the property immediatelv west of this PUD.
5.9 PLANNING
A. If during the course of site clearing. excavation or other construction activity
a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the
minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately
stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
Furthermore, the procedures of Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land
Development Code shall be followed.
B. Sidewalks six feet in width shall be provided on both sides of local streets
and shall connect on-site residential buildings to a sidewalk within a public
roadway, or, if no sidewalk exists. it shall connect to the right-of-way line.
Should a two-directional shared-use path be utilized, the minimum paved
width shall be 10 feet.
C. All sidewalks ana bike lanes shall be constructed in accordance with design
specifications identified in Section d.2.!l.4.146.06.02 and Division
U5.05.08, respectively, of the Land Development Code.
D. If interconnections to existing and future developments are provided, the
interconnection shall include sufficient right-of-way to accommodate the
roadway, sidewalks, and bike lanes. Sidewalks and bike lanes shall be
constructed concurrently with the roadway.
E. For multi-family tracts, sidewalks, six feet in width, must be provided on
both sides of local streets within a dedicated public right-of-way or roadway
easement. Where there is no public right-of-way or roadway easement,
sidewalks must connect on-site residential building(s) to a sidewalk within a
public roadway or, if no sidewalk exists, to the right-of-way line in
accordance with Section 3.2.B.3.176.06.02 of the Land Development Code.
Should a two-directional shared use path be utilized, the minimum paved
width must be 10 feet.
5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida
Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and
17
Packet Page -421-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
approval by the Current Planning Section Staff. Removal of exotic
vegetation shall not be counted towards mitigation for impacts to Collier
County jurisdictional wetlands.
B. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation
tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the
plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida
Statutes. Setbacks and buffers shall be provided in accordance with
Section 3.2.g.4. 7 .36.05.02 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
In the event the Project does not require platting, all conservation areas
shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements
dedicated to an approved entity or to the project's homeowners' association
or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier
County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and
limitations similar to or as per Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes.
C. Buffers shall be provided around any wetlands, extending at least fifteen
(15) feet landward from the edge of wetland preserves in all places and
averaging twenty-five (25) feet from the landward edge of the wetlands.
Where natural buffers are not possible, structural buffers shall be provided
in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resources Permit
Rules and be subject to review and approval by the Current Planning
Environmental Staff.
D. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free)
plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas,
shall be submitted to the Current Planning Section Staff for review and
approval prior to final site development plan/construction plan approval.
This plan shall include the methodology and a time schedule for removal of
exotic vegetation within the conservation/preservation areas.
E. This PUD shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to
protected species on-site.
F. The flow-way/cypress slough (FLUCCS Code 621) shall be preserved as
shown on the PUD Master Plan.
5.11 FIRE
A. All improvements shall be in accordance with all applicable fire codes and
ordinances.
18
Packet Page -422-
4/12/2011 Item SA
5.12 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Developer shall make a payment of $1,000.00. at the time of the first and each
subsequent c10sinq on the sale of each dwellinq unit constructed on the PUD
properly, to the Collier County Affordable Housinq Trust Fund. This commitment
and the subsequent payments shall be credited aqainst any subsequently adopted
affordable, work force, and/or other qap housinq or housinQ needs impact fee.
mitiqation. exaction. fee. contribution, IinkaQe fees. and/or other similar tax or
charqe which would otherwise be applicable to the PUD prooerty. as may be so
contemplated and provided for by such subseQuently adopted provisions.
19
Packet Page -423-
1----
:Ii
,;;(1'.;
.
;;
u
~
~
u
u
'=
t
-,
-" ~
I
;1;'\'''.
....,.-.....
.'u. ........
,,,, ~ l'."'I1.o--...o
. ~'l,' __.
,
.
.
ff
~: "
,. ..
1:;C"
<:;--
~
j
>
, "
0;,
. ~
~ . I
,
. .
"'
i;
,
'.
---<:\
\ \
1 r
.,~i
~-1
:1
:=.1
"
'c,
o
,
,
,~ !
-{~i
"
,
i}
-..-
.
.
'",'3
o
'.
n.
2~
\ ~~~
! ::;W~
.! r--;j ~~ .
~jl ~ ~~~
-\1 I -11.I5
!. ~~<..t
, ! !II ~ln~
~~l ::\ 'i ;:~
~ ,\ .: m_~11 ~ L i:;
I 1!~ ill Ji ~ ~~o
I" ~ II w~ ~
, ,!I ~~~
I .;1 0 bJ ~~~
~~ N~X
. ~..;I ~~;;:
,,"., ill! ....
.I.L........I ~~S:::
I ~u"8
~;;~-
r
4/12/2011 Item 8A
vi
'" ~
~ N -
~~ ~ 5
~u ~ . -r T ii'
~: ~ . K .. -.. .. 0
!j . ~ ~ ..~ ~ 0
~ J! _ N eo:!. t:.
- -
~~ 1; vi .
" ~ ~ ~ Ji .. . .
;i . '" .... .. ..
~ .. Z
'::::-.; :: - ~ -.. ~ ~
<D g .Il'i wi .. <:
!'" ~I:' ~ ..
0 '7, - ~ -l
U 0
~ 1! Q.,
~~ . ~ :o:=:
~~ r;! 0
... . - t.I.l
-~ ~g ! . ~ 0 - .....
a/: . 1i 0 .:. ;g CI'l
." r ~ .. . . <:
~N . ;<
" & .:. .
-~ ~ l ;:;:
-5 ~ ;oJ
i~ ~ .< .. ~
~5 0 o , 0 to e .! 0
.u ] ~o~ .. 0 in ~
~ il~ ! ~~.5 x t Q,.
~ . "CI: 0 ! Q.,
,. ~ .. = > ~ '0
-, Ql . a oS . - a
lI- _ ~'" .. ..~ ~~ ~
~3~ ~:I ~
" . , ~
:~~ -~ ~ ~
~r . 0
~ilg ~~ ,
8 0
~~ ~
;., ,
- :?
I ; ~
.........., N
~ 0::_0<")0..,.
~-""'N~
.c:::: g 8,..0.,...
" P":IQ'I
l- . o~~.a:!
< cr.......,...
j ~~;;:otI
. :tii:~~N
. iftvi--~;;
.
t ol.l.l~ ..
i! ~~Q~cD
N,..~ w
i_
.q
t~
:~
!~
~
o
,
~
.
h
~
~
.
r
1
;
"
j
8
~
.
...
.
0 '"
~ "'"
Q., .~
'" i:i:
<:i
E ~
Q. C
0 ;;!
';j W
>
" ~
C "
c: u
-
/\
/ .1
I ~ I
, . J
~&
"
-,
~:
:.>rt
.".....
'"
6l (l"ZI :;~l~:'OJ:''''
:
}
;,
:-
!
iJ
L".:.~ l. - ::;:):;: lZ :':': i'N~
. _'t:. [;"f- It) '''c: _';I'''l/lj ;:""u\,:''''.&.l;>'j~U'" ;J'~J\,;,.ol:I'r'g ..n:!JI3 Llao".UOZ\s..~.:}Jro~ IoQCl Gr\-~
z_--+--
~~' ~
. ,.
o "
"
- '1
;:<i
'-' 'J.
.
~
,
J"
f~
.:"
.'
....:.
,
~
.
E-
o
-,
i~
.
~
~
=
~
!.
;;r'orZI M ."c:.W-'m.'1
1
i.!~J
Packet Page -424-
.
<
1:!..
i-P
A:c.f
~
...
.
I
,
,
11
;1
"
,
Ij
I"
--I
~ ~I
E':
; J
" 1
.
~
~
~
i'
.
~
u
t
o
:::::~,
" \
'.11
Ii
,~!
I!
~i
.'
'I
~
-Y
...O;"VL L
",;;:;Z I;: ;::"
.~,
~
"
~
-i ~
;~
4/12/2011 Item SA
.
~ T
~----.7
~ ~.,
.1 .. "',
f "
"j
,I \
~
-.
:;;::
~f
::;,
:;
~;V>
~ -
....,z.
~!
.-:;;
,
.,
\~
!
"l
~
.
,
,
.
e
-"-
,-
~ ~vj],
, n
. .
,
,
,
.
~ r'" ~
I II
-" Iii
J
~'l""':' ' :!
If
:J
.
~ 1
3~i
~f'~ 11
:-~2~
._<:ldl :"I'I:J
~
,
~
::;
:;:
.
\
'"
c
e:
~ .~
",.
- ,
~ti
1.;.; :"
,. .
~
'"
:s
1
I
'8 ~,g
; i{
u
.-, :I'l
11
E~
g
L
i
~ I
z ,
~ i
.
:~'1,j\'~.olP "'9 ". ,~\...;
<-':"';:)""1)''''
"'e ,O,""^ W'" ," 425-
Packet Page -
"eel !~r\'"
, 'a....,.o.:Jz\::: -'3:"O~c:
I
;
i~
r
-
;:;
.
- ,
~ "
:5
01!
~
z
~
Vi
"
.. g
:0 =
= ~
:3 ~
,- "
~~
:J.J ....
u
'ii
~
:: -~
. <
"
:!2
"-
o
~
"-
" 0
i -
o
~
I
..
{
z
N~ N
i;:::::~;:!
""",,0""1_
O~IOl
uct':;...tt!
cc....""l_
~1i:_..,..I/J
_cO>.-..
~G:~~~
- '-"<.;l
LIl..n __,..
ou.o~l":
lOE'ooCrt:
;:J~ii:-06i
o "
::l:;!
0.. :;
C r:
" .
= ~
~ -
'::' =
~ 0
" ~
o~
0, :;
'-l
4/12/2011 Item 8A
"Exhibit eft J... ,. J.. J. j (Ii
I
. I I l. I I
J' i I I'" I- Ii I"tlll'
~~I . .... ~
iIliUIJI! il!.l !! ! I,
T " I III I .f J !
I 'I " II I 't
Jill 111111 J! III ~ Iii! II UJ 1l m
, ~ - . - J "I., J ~ '111,',/'1 J
dlt II Jill II bl !. lJlJ I II II III
im S, SII. r I'" g I ''''' ,- JII 'II IS"
!~... h. I!.. I!! dl ~
h.." bt t~I" .5"; .!!
1-<
. Z
~ ~
~ ~
~
0 9
~
~ >
~
0
J w :r: ci;
I :i .
/ ~ ' z
. ~ 1-< ~
. g 0 Z ffi Z
"
~ ~ Cl "
~
0 0 :E '" 3
" p..F'
r./J o => ~
~I ...J ::l. #
g: u ~
r r./J i= :
~ ~ ~
r./J
~' !:IJ ~ u
gl. u ~
0
~I~ ~ t:;
g ,1
@]~ Ii:
,0
>< '''''
'0
U IIlJ
:::=
Q -<
::..
gJ
~ ::..
0
z
:i
..
"'.
....:
~
~'~
I ~
I,
I
,I
Packet Page -426-
~II'H
Ill!!! I:
,"01 t
-I:;. I
~ii 'lji
005\. .
ofll:t!
.
"Exhibit D"
4/12/2011 Item 8A
I""~"-
.... i~}~.-.-=-..... ....
c '-",'~
, - .-';u;:,:
.' ., ., '11');,.,
.~ . ,.i~:1(...."
Packet Page -427-
"-
o
" -
<(
~
<(
::>::'"
'.. '"
-U,J
t..
~~
::J-
:!l><
U
::!-1~
-0
<( ,
u....
",,0
o
z
<(
...J
e
.
l'
'"
~ :
..
N
,
..
i i
" N
~
~
" -
. '"
- .
u .
~ ~
g
N
'"
~
~ g
~
E
:l
"
....""", N
0:-""'0..-
S....nN\D
..0..,_
,.,,=
i~a~~
f?~-""~
itt~ti'N
ti .....~..
~UJ-::.
~~g~~
ZQ. ~
~
N
t.:)
z:
I-l
0:::
I.J..I
I.J..I
z:
i!!
,
N
;;;
.
.
a
a
'"
CI:l
a:
t.:.:
Cl.. U
0
....l -
...... ....l
> r.:
t.:.: ::J
0 0
t.:.: a:
a: C
==
~
~
a
..
~
"'
a
o
N
->
4/12/2011 Item 8A
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of:
ORDINANCE 2005-65
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 15th day of November, 2005, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 22nd
day of November, 2005.
DWIGHT E. BROCK
Clerk of Courts and C1ark
"
Ex-officio to Board of ':.
~.
County Commission4:'Ej"'i. ~_
~ ~.. ~i :;:~b.j .
By: Ann q.~nn~~':-nr;.,::<)':-
Deputy Clerk -.cl.-
Packet Page -428-
4/12/2011 Item SA
ORDINANCE NO. Il-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD)
AND AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICTS TO A
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD)
ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HD
DEVELOPMENT RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP
TO 125 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 33
MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND ASSOCIATED ACCESSORY
USES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE
ROAD, EAST OF OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD, IN
SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 65.29+/-
ACRES SUBJECT TO CONDlTlONS; PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF ORDINANCE 05-65; AND
BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chris Mitchell of Waldrop Engineering, PA, representing Vita Pima, LLC,
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein
described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE [T ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit D,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, located in Section 2 1, Township 48 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) and Agricultural (A) Zoning Districts to a Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a 65.29+/- acre project known as lID Development
RPUD, subject to compliance with Exhibits A through H, attached hereto and incorporated
herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as
HD Development / PUDZ-PL20 1 0-1 054
Revised 3/17/11
Packet Page -429-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance 05-65, adopted on November 15, 2005, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety and replaced with these
provisions.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this
day of
,2011.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
,Deputy Clerk
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~7.l.')jL . /
Steven T. Williams
Assistant County Attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A - Permitted Uses
Exhibit B - Development Standards
Exhibit C - Master Plan
Exhibit D - Legal Description
Exhibit E - Deviations from the LDC
Exhibit F - Development Commitments
Exhibit G - Schematic Buffer Design
Exhibit H - Boardwalk/Sidewalk Easements
CP\I O-CPS-O 1043\55
HD Development / PUDZ-PL2010-1054
Revised 3/17/11
Packet Page -430-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
EXHIBIT "A"
LIST OF PERMITTED USES
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
PERMITTED USES:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole
or in part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses and Structures:
I. Single-Family dwelling units.
2. Multi-Family dwelling units (limited to Tract "A").
Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing
by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land
Development Code (LDC).
B. Accessorv Uses:
Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but
not limited to:
I. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility
buildings.
2. Clubhouse/Recreation uses and facilities, for areas designated as Multi-Family on
the PUD Master Plan, including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts,
fishing docks, walking paths, PICniC areas, recreation buildings, and
basketball/shuffle board courts.
3. Gatehouse
4. Essential servlces, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance
facilities.
5. Water management facilities.
6. Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to
the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in
the Land Development Code (LDC).
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-I054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Pagel of 11
Packet Page -431-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
C. Preserve Area Uses:
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the RPUD Master Plan other than the
following:
1. Passive recreational areas.
2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks.
3. Water management structures.
4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries.
5. Any other conservation related use that is determined to be comparable to the
foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the
Land Development Code (LDC).
D. Development Density
1. A maximum of 125 Single-Family Residential dwelling units for all Single-
Family tracts within the HD Development RPUD.
2. A maximum 01'33 Multi-Family.
3. A maximum of 158 dwelling units shall be constructed in the Residential Areas of
the project. The gross project area is 65.29 :!: acres and the residential density
maximum shall be 2.42 units per acre.
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-1054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Page 2 of 11
Packet Page -432-
4/12/2011 Item SA
EXHIBIT "B"
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
UD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
Development of the HD Development RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this
Ordinance and applicable sections of the LDC and Orowth Management Plan (OMP) in effect at
the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat,
tinal site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which
such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then
the provisions of the most similar district shall apply.
Table I below sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the HD
Development RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in
applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat.
Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows:
I. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback is measured from
the adjacent right-of-way line.
2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the
back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel is served by a platted private drive, the
setback is measured from the road easement or property line, whichever is more
restrictive.
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
I I Single Familv
I Standards I Multi Familv
Minimum Lot Area i 6,000 SF (per unit) N/A
Minimum Lot Width 150' (1) N/A
Front Yard Setback i 19' (2) 15'
Side Yard Setback ,
,
1 Story 6' 7.5'
I 2 Story 6' 10'
i 3 Story N/A 12.5'
Rear Yard Setback
Principal Structure 20' (30' adjacent to Olde 20'
Cypress PUD)
Accessory Structure 10' (20' adjacent to Olde 10'
Cvpress PUD) I
PUD Boundary Setback i
Principal Structure I N/A 20'
! KIA
; 20'
10'
20'
Accessor Structure
Lake Setback (3)
Preserve Area Setback
Principal Structure
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL20 I 0-1 054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
25'
25'
Page 3 of 11
Packet Page -433-
4/12/2011 Item 8.A.
}\ccessorv Structure 10' 10'
Distance Between Structures
MainlPrincipal
1 Story 12' 15'
2 Story N/A 20'
3 Story N/}\ 25'
}\ccessorv Structures 10' 10'
Maximum Height
Principal Building (Actual) 40' with a max of2 story N/A
Principal Building (Zoned) 35' 42' with a max. of3 stories
Accessory Building (}\ctual) 25' N/A
Accessory Building (Zoned) 20' 20'
Clubhouse Building (Actual) N/A N/A
Clubhouse Buildin[! (Zoned) N/}\ 38'
Minimum Floor Area 1600 SF 650 SF for 1 Bedroom
900 SF for 2 Bedrooms
1000 SF for 3 Bedrooms
1. May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots and lots on the inside part of the curved streets by 25%.
2. The distance from the back of the sidewalk to the garage door must be at least 23 feet to
allow room to park a vehicle on the driveway without parking over the sidewalk. The
front yard setback for side-loaded garages may be reduced to 18', with the home
remaining at 19'.
3. Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake.
A. PRESERVE ARE}\ REQUIREMENTS
1. }\ minimum of twenty-five (25) percent of the viable native vegetation (64.9 acres), as
described in Section 3.05.07.B of the Land Development Code, shall be provided on-site,
including both the under-story and the ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous
area possible. A total of 16.23 acres is required to be preserved.
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ.PL20 10-1 054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Page4ofl1
Packet Page -434-
I
I:
!i
II 11.1,1 -1
'II I_ i I :
I 'I II
II I" !
" I I' 'l'
I. -
iii, I I .11 ,I
, ,
I
I
I~
I,; i
! ) "
1'",1 ,
I,li Pl I
~l'linlg
~~~,-
i lit!,
~ r~~
~ I ..~
'i 11 t'G}
,I .,
n I
I
.::.=
I~
:~
.I~
j,
Illl
I"
i'
I
I- . d'03/17/2011
Last ReVIse .
4/12/2011 Item 8A
, I
' !'j!llf !II _ I: I
: n',ill _ - 1. I ' ',I ,
I "I I I 'I I'! " ,
' 9 ' I'! '1 I I I 'I I I' I
iiT "I ': . I 'i'LL.'~', -1 '!
",ll] I -'-::J:, C .. "T l " Iii'
~lrl=rll=l F 1 ~i~~ r=(i, j
, Iii c::;:jn'-.:'~:=J'l8 ,-: ,i . '
Ilirtll ~j ~i I~-~ l~.!" 11!1
~' ~ I~" " 'II
I ~'I i - 'I' I I'(_u i'l
. ,:.- 1 r-----r I~ II ,
' .,~, ill ti':. i I 1il1 ;:'1
,
II
l:. 'I', .', /z" ------...;1--- \,
' I,! " I "" /" " " !J " "-
,I .', I,!'11 / /, \ '/ /'~' V1; '.
II li'l //~;~~ '\:~\ ~VA'" f 1:'1
' "~, '.-(\)/ L
' ,i., \/'-'-")/ I nr
\~~ J (\ /~_ ' Iii
\~~'1~>;;;:1~/~/~ / ~: II il
'\ '';;1: / , /). / I' :Ii
\,-7. / / // ,-'iI, ___ _~I
! / \._------- ( I
. '\ I'
· 'I . ( i---;--:I;
'1 ./__'~II
! '\ ) II
,
I' '
I I
,
,
...
I
~
I~
'h
J'i \
11,1 ,-
, '
1\1 ii1i \
J,_~_ ~-f;
I \) ,
' 'I,'
,I .
II !' '.
I
1~.I.'t,
, I. ,
I- ~
r- . 'I"
--
h
Ii
.z~
~
DEVELOPMENT RPUD
HD T. VITA PIMA, LLC.
CLlEN. TER PUN
ruo MAmSfT 'c'
EXH
l~l'.'l'\..Il.:I.I..]..':.I_
ENGINEERING
~~.
-
_II_.~
..-.-.":""--~-
.-
435.
Packet Page -
4/12/2011 Item 8A
EXHIBIT "D"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
Property Description:
A parcel or tract ofland situated in the State of Florida, County of Collier, lying in Section 21,
Township 48 south, Range 26 east and being further bounded and described as follows:
Commencing at southwest comer of the southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 48 south,
Range 26 east, thence n.00059'51 "w. along the west line of the southwest quarter of said section
for 100.00 feet to the northerly right-ofline ofa 100 feet wide drainage canal as described in
deed book 43, page 251 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence n.89008'23"e..
along said northerly right-of way for 330.14 feet to the southeast comer of Tract 13 of Olde
Cypress, Unit One, a subdivision recorded in Plat Book 32 at pages i through 11, inclusive, of
the public records of Collier County, Florida; thence continue n.89008'23"e. along said northerly
right-of-way line for 330.14 feet to an intersection with the west line of the west half of the east
half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section 21 and to the point of
beginning; thence n.00D59' 15 "w. along the west line of said fraction for 1230.24 feet to the
northwest corner of said fraction and to the southerly line of the aforesaid Olde Cypress, Unit
One subdivision; thence n.89007'34"e. along the southerly line of said subdivision for 1981.51
feet; thence n.89008'07"e. along the southerly line of said subdivision for 330.24 feet to the
northeast corner of the west half of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter
of said section 21; thence s.00057'12''e. along the east line of said fraction and along said
subdivision line for 1230.83 feet to the aforesaid northerly right-of-way line ofa 100 feet wide
drainage canal; thence s.89009'28"w. along said northerly right-of-way for 330.16 feet to the east
line of the southwest quarter of said section 21; thence s.89008'23"w. along said northerly right-
of-way line for 1980.86 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel contains 65.294 acres, more or less.
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-1054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Page 6 ofll
Packet Page -436-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
EXHIBIT "E"
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC FOR THE
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
Deviation No.1: The Applicant is requesting a deviation from Land Development Code (LDC)
Section 6.06.01. 0 to allow for a 50' right-of-way internal to the proposed development. This
Section of the LDC requires that a local road right-of-way be a minimum of 60 feet wide.
Justification: The internal rights of way shall be private and shall be maintained by the HOA.
The proposed deviation allows for design flexibility as well as consistency with right-of-way
widths approved for the HD Development RPUD. The reduced right-of-way width allows for
single family development within the parcel. For these reasons, the proposed deviation will not
negatively impact public health, safety or welfare.
Deviation No.2: The Applicant is requesting relief from Land Development Code (LDC)
Section 5.03.02.C which permits a maximum wall height of six (6) feet in residential zoning
districts, to allow for a maximum height of eight (8) feet for a combination wall and berm along
a portion of the southern property line.
Justification: The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening and mitigation of
noise pollution resulting from traffic along lmmokalee Road, a 4-lane divided arterial roadway.
Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as
enhance the HD Development PUD and Olde Cypress Community.
HD DevelopmeTIt RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-J054
Last Revised: 03/] 7120 11
Page 7 of] 1
Packet Page -437-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
EXHIBIT "F"
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
1. ENVIRONMENTAL
A. The flow-way/cypress slough (FLUCCS Code 62]) shall be preserved as shown on the
PUD Master Plan.
2. LANDSCAPE
A. The required 10- foot Type A buffer required along the northern property line shall be 20
feet wide from the western property line a distance of approximately I,] 60 feet, where
Treeline Drive diverts from the east-west alignment to head northwest, as depicted in
Exhibit C PUD Master Plan. The p]antings will be consistent with Exhibit G Schematic
Buffer Design.
B. A combination 6-foot precast or masonry wall and 2-foot berm shall be required along a
portion of the southern property line, as depicted on Exhibit C PUD Master Plan. The
location of the wall is subject to approval at the time ofPPL review.
3. TRAFFIC
The development of this PUD shall be subject to and governed by the following minimum
stipulations.
A. Payment in Lieu of 6-foot sidewalks and 4-foot bike lanes for lmmokalee Road frontage
shall be required. The amount shall be determined utilizing FOOT's 2008 Transportation
Costs, as amended. Payment shall be required prior to PPL approval.
B. Any negotiations relevant to "fair share" payment(s), or reimbursement(s), from any and
all other neighboring developer(s)/property owner(s), that directly benefit from said
traffic signal(s), will be determined based upon percentage of usage/impact. The Owner,
his successor, or assign(s) agrees to contribute proportionate far share payment(s) toward
traffic control improvements at the following intersections:
]. Treeline Drive at aIde Cypress BoulevardILogan Boulevard Extension
2. aide Cypress Boulevard at Irnmokalee Road
The improvements may include, but shall not be limited to, signal installation or improvement of
existing signalization, and turn Jane improvements. Payment shall be required within 90 days of
the County's request, or upon inclusion of improvements in a development order such as an SOP
or Plat, or when warrants are considered met as a result of the project's traffic. Proportionate
share must be calculated based on percentage of this project's impact on the operating capacity
of the improvements. Payment shall be made to the entity responsible for construction!
maintenance/ ownership of the improvement(s).
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL201 0- I 054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Page 8 of II
Packet Page -438-
4/12/2011 Item SA
For any improvements constructed by the Owner, and for any rights of way or Public Access
easements contributed by this development to Collier County, the Owner, his successor, or
assign(s) agrees to retain responsibility to operate and maintain said conveyances until such time
that the Board of County Commissioners formally accepts ownership and maintenance
responsibility for of the improvements.
C. A sidewalk easement is required as depicted on Exhibit H, HD Development Easement
Requirements, for the existing sidewalk/pathway servicing the existing control structure
for the Cocohatchee Canal. The granting of the sidewalk easement will not require
additional buffer width for the landscape buffer required adjacent to the canal right-of-
way. Plantings shall be placed within the remaining width of the 20 foot landscape buffer.
If the area cannot be effectively planted, no plantings shall be required for the length of
the easement. The sidewalk easement shall be provided by the Owner at no cost to the
county within 90 days of the County's request, or upon inclusion of improvements in a
development order, such as an SOP or Plat.
D. A boardwalk easement is required as depicted on Exhibit H, HD Development Easement
Requirements, to allow for an elevated boardwalk adjacent to the surface water
management weir providing controlled discharge for the adjacent slough to the
Cocohatchee Canal. The easement shall be 15 feet wide and taper to the boundary within
50 feet of the end of the weir. The granting of the boardwalk easement will not require
additional buffer width for the landscape butler required adjacent to the canal right-of-
way for portions of the buffer within the developable portions of the PUD. Plantings
shall be placed within the remaining width if the 20 foot landscape buffer. If the area
cannot be effectively planted, no plamings shall be required for the length of the
easement. The Owner will cooperate with Collier County as the land owner in securing
the necessary permits for the construction of the boardwalk. The Owner shall not be
financially responsible for the permitting, wetland mitigation or construction of the
boardwalk. The boardwalk easement shall be provided by the Owner at no cost to the
county within 90 days of the County's request, or upon inclusion of improvements in a
development order, such as an SDP or Plat.
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-1054
Last Revised: 03117/2011
Page9ofl1
Packet Page -439-
4/12/2011 Item 8A
IIBI 'BI"BI 'Bi "'BI
n,I.1' lit Iff rug)
III II III III !IIII
",It, ,I,
m \I Iii I' lUll
!! If'! ,
I
llll} !!}lllilj
f il
I ,
I ,! ,,1 .1 '~'I
iiB!'BIIIIBI 'BI "'il
uf If 'Uf .f uuf
Ii! IIIIH II filii
,1,111' ,I,
'1
iJi! illlljll !llll,'
I' !! ,
I
ill il Hilil ml
I ;{ ~I'" . ..
a I .1
I I ,
, .1 ...1 .1 ",1
~L
~
~
"
~
~ H
~ ~ ~
. .
m m
~ ~
" "
S ~
z
J
e :~
n I~
~ I~
m I'
I
I
i
, il
, I,
i II!\
~t-lnilll , I '/(/~-"
'-" / : \ : \ '\
\ --r 'I a '.. \
I \ I ' I , " ! '\ '
'_~IJI ,l I~il' 1\ \
n II Iii . ' \
, -Jh; ,llil~' ,/ \
.' , .lkJ / ~ Is \ 5 \
Ii 'I' ~ 1 :,~ I i I, \" \
. II f/~ - ~I , J ~ i~ ,i I ! i ~
III , I \1 c ~ ': \ ' \ \
" " JI -1: n ' I,:' " '\ \
" i J m I II \
'-- / . 'I \ \
\ '- -- I I i \ '-- ~
,', I, . ~ ~.\\ "
_.~~~\ '\\ I
r;:;I Q.;P.i~~ n
l-=:J LANgIC"'. "'~~llll.l>T\I.E- - L
~
..
I II--'-'~ I [!l
EXHIBtTG _ _ ~ HD Development RPUO (1xIllbIIG)
~ NAPLES. FLORID"
I SCHEMATIC BUFFER OESfGN I PREP OF : VlTAP~A LlC
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL2010-1054
Last Revised: 03/17/2011
Page 10 of 11
Packet Page -440-
'I ~
Ill!
'!
.1"
~ .", ",'
r-~-'c"'"
'\~~li,U:~
j J!j:;..<
,I~ L, ,".~
i I. ,':.':,\- ~I
I
-+--.a---...___...-...u.........._.
i -. i /~/
: i
I '
, !
I j l!
: h '.,
I
,
:
:
,
8:
~:
~:
~:
~:
m'
>,
~:
.:~::;;;= _;l:.,::=:;;l
: f'""--::"'""-'""-'""-",,;:
J '!i
, n______-'_____~ :;
" I I,
" I I,
~l--------~iy---l~~~~~~l
, I'
,
Ih
11:1 !
:11
: i
,
(O""r;'~
( i
j
i
j
I
i
_Z :::~,.._..
I'''' 'I! Ii I!
1III,,'I! II I!.
11'11 ill
ll','II'11
II! II I
,. ,
PlJl)(UVIJ1OKS
i
,
, '
,
i
4/12/2011 Item 8A
/
_/
:
.
~
"
,
,
:
"
"
~
I ::
"
,
l :
I i
,
,
"
~ '::
"
: ~
"
"
:~
"
:
:, "
,
: :1
,
: 11
~ ,
, ,
::
,
~ "
:: ,
" ,
~ ~ :' , I
i " :
m " I ,
~ " ,
~ ~ , !
,
i ,
,
i :,
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
Ii
:
,
,/~:r
! :1
"I
I ~
,
"
"
"
,
"
"
::
"
I
_2 -::.".....
I~I~
_..........:..'-:~-
;.:..._~;;;;;;:;,;.n;.;.:..;;;;~.~
..-.......-.-
HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD
CLIENT: VITA PIMA, LLC.
PUD EXH.18IT ~w
HD Development RPUD - PUDZ-PL20 I 0- ] 054
Last Revised: 03117/201 j
Packet Page -441-
Page 11 of 11
4/12/2011 Item 8A
20D · Tuesday, March 22, 2011 · Naples DaDy News
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CON~lbER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby 9iven that on TUESDAY, April 12. 2011, in the Boardroom.3rd
Floor. Administration -Building, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East - Ta.
miami Trail, Naples, Florida. the Board of County <;:ommissioners willcoASider the
enactment of a 'County Ordinance. The meeting 'will commence ,at 9:00 A.M," lhe
title ottha proposed Ordinance is as follows: -'. - .
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COL-
LIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA. BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE 20NING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER-
TY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) AND AGRlaJl-
TURAL lA) ZONING DISTRlm TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR rHE PROJECT KNOWN AS HD DEVELOPMENT RPUD,
TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 12S SINGLHAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND
33 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND ASSOCIATED ACCESSORY USES, lOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE Of IMMOKAlEE ROAD, EAST OF OLDE CYPRESS BOUlEVARD,.lN SEC-
TION 21, TOWNSHIP 4B SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CON-
SISTING OF 6S.Z9 +1- ACRES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL"
AND REPLACEMENT OF ORDINANCE OS-j;S; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE. " "
'copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and 'are
available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend "'n;d, be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the
County adA1inistrator prior to. presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers .will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an in.
dividual to speak en behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. Jf:recog-
. nized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be ail lotted
10 minutes to speak on an item. .
Persons wishing- to have written or graphic materialsinduded in the-Soard_agenda
packets must 'submit said material:8 minimum-of 3 weeks prior to :the respective
public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered ,by 'the
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum ofsevenda:ys
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board
will become a permanent part of the record. .
Any person who, decides to appeal a decision of the Board' will need a' record of the
proceedings pertaining ,thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a . Verbatim
record of the proceedings is made,' which record, includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is based. .
If you- area person with a disability who needs any accommodation in. order to par~
. ticlpate,in this proceeding, you are entitled,.at no cost to you, to the provision of
certain assistance. Please "contact the Collier CbuntyFacilities Man.ag~ment Depart-
ment, located at :3335 :rami.ami Tr~H East, Buildinf! W! Naples, Florida. 3411?:,
(239)252-8380; ASSisted hstel"llng deVices for the oearrng Impimed are: avaIlable In
the County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Verg'ara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
M.arrh")') '011
Nn1Rq,a~q1
,.
Packet Page -442-