Agenda 03/08/2011 Item #16E5
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
EXECUTIVE$UMMARY
f\
Recommendation. to .approve..theselection. offirm..for...~h sub disclpl....r
Request for Proposal (RfP) ()9-S262-S for Engineeril)g Services for CoI"c;(lJ,~'
and direct staff to bring a negotiated contractitQth.aoalfdforsubaeqp~t approval
(estimated annual expendituresS2,OQO,OOO).
OBJECTIVE: . To.. obtain approval from the Board of . County . Commissioners of the
Selection Committee's. final rankings and to direct staff to enter into contract negotiations,
for additional Engineering disciplines, incl4ding,ModelinQand Simulation, Surveying,
Permitting, and Instrumentation and Controls .(incluQing SCAOAand. Low VoltaQe)Jor use
by County departments to facilitate operations and.capitalprQjeetimpiementation.
CQNS.IDERATlON: The Board of County Commi$$.ioners otlJune2~,2009direetedstaff
to re-solicit the various consulting and design contracts to offerl()C8tfirmsproviding these
services an opportunity to be awarded work. PurchfilsingstaffdeveJopedanRFPthat
consolidated six... major Engineering.. agreements into one. COmpetitiv~COf'tsultant
Negotiation Act (CCNA) solicitation and separated the engineering work into nine (9) major
Engineering disciplines including: Aero$pace (AE), Chemical (CH), Coastal
Zone/Environmental.(CZ),. Electrical (EL), Materials Testing (MA), MeChanical (ME),Projed
Management (PM), StrJ,Jctural (ST), and Civil (CI). The Board awarded these contracts .()n
March 9, 2010 (Item .10D).
f\
In October ~010, Purchasing Department staffc()OductedasulVey of County staff
(Directors and Project Managers) who use these contracts in .an effort to determine the
effectiveness oUhe C04ntywide Engineeringc.ontracts.
The $urveyinformation was. compiled and subsequently . diSCUssed .. corporately with
representatives from. the using departments. The. vast mcajority. oftha users favored
renewing the existing contra.cts. Many of them also wanted. the Purchasing Department.to
add. some additional disciplines.
As a result, anRFPwas developed and issued for four.newsubdi$ciplines. TheRFPwas
posted on December 3, 2010, with 1 ,07gemaU. notices~flt to firms who provi(:ie.tbese
services. Forty-six proposals were received on the due deteof January 6, 2()11. A
summary of the firms,and the firm's self -identified subdiscipfine(s), is attachedlai>e~
"Summary of Proposers."
The staff. selection committee of eight members was. divided into two $UDCOfllf'nitteesto
rank and score the firms by discipline. The subcommittees reached a consensus ranking
for the four sub disciplines identified as fol.fows:
r-"\
Attachment A
ModeUng and $tmutation
..' .>. Recommended Firm Shortlist
<...............;inord~rb '"sub.di$~ ... e.........
1. Carollo
2. Tetra Tech
3. Greeley Hansen
4. AECOM
5. Wilson Miller Stantec
...~tt.;a0,hel11ent< .. ..;. . ........>StJ.bp~c~Plin~;
Packet Page -1()73-
Attachment B
Instrumentation and Controls
(including SCADA and Low
Voltage)
r"\
Attachment C
Permitting
Attachment 0
Surveying and Mapping
318/20111tern
1. Mckim & Creed
2. Carollo
3. TetraT ech
4. RKS Consulting
5. - Pelican Engineering
Consultants
1. WilsonMiller Stantec
2. Johnson Engineering
3. CH2MHiII
4. Hole Montes
5. Q Grady Minor
6. Qavidson Engineering
7. AgnoliBarber
8. RWA
1 AgnotiBarber
2. Hole Montes
3. WilsonMiUer Stantec
4. AIM Engineering
5. Johnson Engineering
6. RWA
Staff is recommending that the Board select each of the firms identified for each discipline
and that the Board direct staff to negotiate a contract with each firm. Staff will submit a
subsequent executive.summary to obtain Board approval of each contract.
~
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available. in. various. department budgets that use . these
agreements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT . IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with this Executive Summary.
LEGA"-. CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's
office I requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
RECO,.ENDATION: That the Board of Collier County. Commissioners apprOves the
recommended shortlist for each sub discipline under RFP 09.5262-S for Engineering
Services for CoflierCounty,and directs staff to bring ne.gotiated contracts to theSoar'dfor
subsequent approval.
PREPARED BY: Joanne Markiewicz, Acquisition Manager . and. Scott.. Johnson,
Procurement Strategist, Purchasing Department .
r-"..
Packet Page -1074-
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
r"\
COLLIER COUNT.Y
8q:ardofCounty Commis$lpner-s
Item Number: 16.E.5.
Item Summary: Selectionoffirms under RequestforProposal{RFP)09-5262-S for
Engineering Services for Collier County
Meeting Date: 3/8/2011
Prepared By
Name:. MarkiewiczJoanne
Title: Manager - Purchasing,Acquisition,Purchasing & General. Services
2/17/2011 6:10:04 PM
Subrnitted by
r-'\
Title: MaIlager - PurchasingAcquisition,Purcbasing & GeneJ'a.1 Services
Name: MarkiewiczJoanne
2/17/20116:1O:05PM
Approved By
. Name: SmithKristen
Title:f\.dministrative Se<;retary ,Risk Management
Date: 2/18/2011 8: 19:45 AM
Name:. CarnellSteve
. Title: Director -J'urchasiug/General Services,Purchasing
Date: 2/18/2(IU 4:10:20 PM
Name: GreeneCoUeen
Title: Assistant GountyAttorney,County Attorney
Date: 2/23/2011 1:49:36>PM
Name: PriceLen
Title: Administrator - AdmmistrativeServices,
Date: 2/24/201112:23:24 PM
r-"\
Name: StanleyTherese
Packet Page ":1075-
r\
r'\.
r'\
Title: ManagementlBudget Analyst,. ~J,1ior,Office .ofMan88eItl~t .aU~8et
Date:;: 2/24/2011 2:26:07 PM .
Name: Klatzkow.Jeff
Title: County At,tomey,
Date:2/25/20119:17:29AM
Name: GreeneCoUeen
Title: Assistant County A~ey,County Attorney
Date: 2/25/2011 9:40:05 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: COUnty Manager
Date: 2/26/20112:34:0S.PM
PacketPage~107~
'. .....:--,-.:....-"._.,.-...:...'
,-..,....,. ,"-, -..-",.,'
3/8/2011lt~m16.E.5.
~
Attachment A: Rank Order
Modeling and Simulation
~
Carollo
Tetra Tech
Greele Hansen
AECOM
WilsonMiller Stantec
Jacobs
McKim & Creed
Johnson En ineerin
Stanle Consultants
HSA En ineers
CPH
A noli Barber
RWA
Banks En ineerin
DKS Associates
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
Modelin
2.666666667
3
3.333333333
3.666666667
4.666666667
5
6.333333333
8
10
10.33333333
11
11.66666667
11.66666667
13.66666667
15
Purchasing Representative
I Scott Johnson ---: Date
..---.
Packet Page -1077-
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
13
14
2/1/2011l
09-5262-S Countywide Engineering Services
1
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
Attachment B: Rank Order
Instrumentation and Controls (including SCADA and Low Voltage)
/'"""\
McKim & Creed & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 2.6667 1
Carollo & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 3 2
Tetra Tech & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 4.333 3
RKS Consultin & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 5.3333 4
Pelican En ineerin Consultants & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 5.66667 5
WilsonMiller Stantec & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 6.3333 6
CDM & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 7.3333 7
WSW En ineerin & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 7.3333 8
Greele Hansen & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 9.33333 9
AECOM & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 9.66667 10
Stanle Consultants & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 10 11
Jacobs & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 10.3333 12
HSA En ineers & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 10.6667 13
A TP En ineerin & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 13 14 ~
DKS Associates & C, SCADA and Low Volta e 15 15
Purchasing Representative I Scott Johnson I Date 2/7/20111
~
09-5262-5 Countywide Engineering Services
2
packetpage-1078-
~.
Attachment C: Rank Order
Permitting
~
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
Permittin
ineers
Sciences
Purchasing Representative
I Joanne Markiewicz I Date
~
5.0000
6.6667
8.0000
8.3333
9.0000
10.0000
11.3333
11.3333
12.3333
12.3333
12.3333
13.0000
13.6667
13.6667
14.0000
15.3333
15.6667
16.3333
19.3333
19.3333
19.3333
19.6667
19.6667
19.6667
20.3333
20.6667
23.0000
23.3333
26.6667
28.3333
28.3333
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
I
2/8/20111
09-5262-S Countywide Engineering Services
3
Packet Page -1079-
Attachment D: Rank Order
Surveying and Mapping
3/8/2011 Item 16.E.5.
~
Final
Name of Firm Discipline Average Committee
Rank
3.333333 1
3.666667 2
5 3
5.666667 4
6.666667 5
6.666667 5
7.333333 7
8.333333 8
10.66667 9
11 10
11.33333 11
11.66667 12
12 13
13.66667 14 I""""'.
13.66667 14
14 16
14.66667 17
15.33333 18
Services 15.33333 18
I
! Scott Johnson
Purchasing Representative
Packet Page -1080-
'I Date
2/17/11
I""""'.
09-5262-S Countywide Engineering Services
4