Agenda 09/11/2012 Item # 9B9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance Establishing the Hacienda Lakes Community
Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section 100.005(2)(a) -(f), Florida Statutes.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this public hearing is for the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to review
and consider approving an ordinance establishing the Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District (CDD).
BACKGROUND:
The Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), was approved by the
Board of County Commissioners at their meeting of October 25, 2011, by Ordinance No. 2011-
41. Hacienda Lakes was additionally approved as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) by
the Board of County Commissioners on the same date, by Resolution No. 2011 -201 and
Development Order 2011 -05.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On March 23, 2012, Hacienda Lakes, LLC, of which the managing members are the Wilton Land
Company, LLC and the Marco Island Group, LLC, by and through their undersigned attorney,
jointly filed a petition with the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning and Zoning
Department, Growth Management Division for the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes
Community Development District. A mandatory $15,000 application fee was submitted with the
petition.
The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida and consists of 615.2
acres, more or less, of land. The site is located in Sections 11, 13, 14, 23 and 24, Township 50
South, Range 26 East. The proposed District is for the most part bounded on the South by Johns
Road (extended east), on the West by Collier Boulevard (CR 951), on the North by the Willow
Run Quarry property, and on the East by the future Benfield Road corridor and Hacienda Lakes'
preservation lands.
A map showing the location of the land area to be serviced by the District, as well as a metes and
bounds description of the proposed CDD, appears as Exhibits "1" and "2" to the petition. The
landowner's consent to the establishment of the proposed CDD appears as Exhibit "3" of the
petition.
The CDD is comprised of approximately 615.2 acres, more or less, of the previously approved
Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as the "Hacienda Lakes MPUD." The proposed
District involves acreage located within the Hacienda Lakes PUD and acreage located outside
the Hacienda Lakes PUD. These non -PUD acres lie adjacently south of The Lord's Way and
west of the Swamp Buggy [Days] "Florida Sports Park" event facility and are comprised of
approximately 30.8 acres, more or less. The present proposal for these parcels is to put
Packet Page -471-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
stormwater drainage and potable water facilities on The Lord's Way frontage; rezoning them
will be in the future. Conversely, the proposed District excludes certain acreages located within
the Hacienda Lakes PUD. These non -CDD acres are comprised of the reconfigured Swamp
Buggy Days event facility and open lands not to be developed.
The proposed CDD includes the Hacienda Lakes MPUD /DRI, approved for a total of 327,500
square feet of commercial floor area; 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office
space, with the capability to convert retail space to offices; 140,000 square feet of business park
uses or education facility; 1,760 residential dwelling units, with capabilities to convert residential
density to recreational vehicle park and senior living facility; and, 135 hotel rooms, with the
capability to convert site to business park. The proposed CDD also includes approximately 30
acres of adjacent undeveloped land that are not within the MPUD that are to be rezoned in the
future. The existing Swamp Buggy [Days] "Florida Sports Park" attraction and "Junior Deputy"
passive recreation areas are not components of the proposed CDD.
Exhibit 9
Stage Two
Year
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
Single - Family Multi- Family
Development Phasing
Office
The Project will be developed in one overall phase. broken into two
stages as shown below.:
2015
Stage One
0 Units
Yearn
Residential Single - Family Multi- Family Retail Office
Business Park School
2012
50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF 0.0 SF
0.0 SF
2013
200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF
0.0 SF
2014
200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF' 25,000 SF
40,000 SF
2015
250 Unb** 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF
0.0 SF
016
250 Units 100 it 150 Unity 00 SF [i 0 SF
0.0 S
0.0 SF
950 Units 420 Units 53013nits 327,500 SF 70,000 SF
40,000 SF
Stage Two
Year
Residential
Single - Family Multi- Family
Retail
Office
Business Park
School
2015
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
919 Students
2016
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0,0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2017
275 Units
100 Units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2018
275 Units
100 Units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
30I9
;A_U&iq
94 UOi 5
1,'_b,�?Pits
0 0 9F
0,t? SF
2- _,_„0tHIO CF
810 Units
284 Units
526 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
100,000 SF
919 Students
Totals:
1760 Units
704 Units
1056 units
327„500 SF
70,000 SF
140,D00 SF
919 Students
The 135 room hotel is proposed to he developed in Stage one, in 2014.
"" The optional 290 runt RV Perk may be developed in Stage One, in 2015
By adopting the ordinance and granting the petition, the Board of County Commissioners would
authorize the District, through its Board of Supervisors, to manage and finance certain basic
infrastructure for the benefit of the landowners and residents of the Hacienda Lakes
Development. This infrastructure, under section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, includes basic
urban systems, facilities, services, improvements, and projects, including water supply, sewers
and wastewater management, surface water control and management (drainage), roads, bridges
2
Packet Page -472-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
and street lights. If adopted, this Ordinance would further constitute consent by the County to
the exercise of certain additional special powers authorized by Section 190.012(2), Florida
Statutes. These powers may include the operation of parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor
recreational, cultural, and educational uses, as well as security, including, but not limited to,
guard- houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars, with
certain exceptions.
The District Board of Supervisors is initially elected for the first six years of the duration of this
District in a property-based election (one -acre, one - vote), which has been specifically ruled
constitutional (State of Florida v. Frontier Acres Community Development Dist., 472 So. 2d 455
(Fla. 1985)). By operation of law, in time, the Supervisors are elected on a one - person, one -vote
basis.
In order to provide the basic systems, facilities and services, the District has certain management
and financing powers. It may only exercise those powers, however, if they comply with certain
strict and detailed procedural requirements including ethics in government, disclosure, conflict of
interest requirements, noticed meetings, government -in- the - sunshine conduct, accounting and
reporting requirements to various local and state agencies, consultants' competitive negotiation
procedures, competitive bidding procedures and others.
The adoption of the CDD Ordinance does not constitute a form of development approval.
Adoption of the CDD and compliance with these many procedural requirements does not, in any
way, allow the District to manage and finance any of these services and facilities without
showing that all legitimate policies, constraints, authorities, controls, pen-nits or conditions on the
development of the land, whether local, regional, state or federal in nature, and whether in the
form of policies, laws, rules, regulations or ordinances, have been complied with concerning
development of the property. In essence, adoption of the CDD Ordinance does not exempt the
petitioner from compliance with any applicable local, regional, state or federal permitting or
regulatory processes. In this sense, the Community Development District is merely a mechanism
to assure the County and the landowners of the district that the provision of infrastructure and
services for the PUD is managed and financed in an efficient and economical way. Finally, in
order to prevent potential abuses of districts by landowners or by other local governments, the
Legislature has provided that the charter of the District, in the general statute itself, may be
amended only by the Legislature.
In order to provide these systems, facilities and services, the District also is given certain
eminent domain powers for the uses and purpose of the district relating solely to water, sewer,
district roads, and water management, specifically including the power for the taking of
easements for the drainage of land of one person over and through another. The District is also
given the authority to require services charges, fees or taxes for the various serves rendered,
ranging from installation of capital facilities to long -tenn maintenance and repair. Without the
County's consent, by resolution, the aforementioned eminent domain power is limited to the
boundaries of the District.
The District may also issue revenue and other user bonds as well as general obligation bonds.
However, no general obligation bonds can be issued without a referendum and without showing
Packet Page -473-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
that the bond will not exceed thirty -five percent (35 %) of the assessed valuation of the property
within the District. Even with these safeguards and constraints, during the first six (6) years of
the District's existence, the board of supervisors shall not issue general obligation bonds unless
the board first holds elections on a one - person, one -vote basis for a new board of supervisors.
Accordingly, should Collier County adopt the Ordinance, it establishes the Hacienda Lakes
Community Development District as a management tool to benefit both Collier County's existing
and future landowners with pinpointed responsibility for timely, efficient, reliable and flexible
service provision without burdening the existing taxpayers and financial structure of Collier
County. In addition, the District is also a financing tool off the balance sheet of the County and
the developer. It will provide long -range and sustained quality service to initial and subsequent
landowners without burdening Collier County and its taxpayers.
Finally, such a District may not outlive its practical utility and usefulness. If it ceases to
function, it will automatically be disbanded by state law. If at any time during its existence
Collier County determines by a non - emergency ordinance that it can provide any one of the
district services in a more economical manner, over the long teen, at lower cost but with higher
quality, Collier County may then take that service away from the District and provide the service
itself.
Section 190.005(2)(a) -(f), Florida Statutes provides that the exclusive and uniform method for
establishment of a CDD of less than 1,000 acres shall be by County Ordinance. Section
190.005(2)(a) -(f), Florida Statutes outlines the specific content required in the petition and
further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider in
determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD as follows:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and
correct.
2. Whether the creation of the District is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion
of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently
compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated
community.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the District.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the District will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special-
district government.
County legal, planning, transportation and public works staffs have reviewed the petition and
exhibits submitted by the petitioners (attached) relative to these six factors and have found the
proposed Hacienda Lakes CDD petition to be compliant with each of the six review factors.
Staff analysis relative to the six factors can be found in Attachment 1.
11
Packet Page -474-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As previously noted, a $15,000 filing fee was submitted with the petition. Exhibit "8 ", Hacienda
Lakes Community Development District Estimated Costs of District Improvements and Exhibit
"9 ", Hacienda Lakes Community Development District Development Phasing, of the petition
delineate the fiscal impacts and timing of impacts to be managed by the District. It is noteworthy
that the estimated internal infrastructure and services to be financed by the CDD is $44,275,594
consisting of roadway, multi -modal and transit facilities, and utilities construction, stormwater
management, landscaping, lighting, signage, security, open space improvements /environmental
mitigation and contingency costs. Water distribution and wastewater collection utilities along
with certain rights -of -way improvements will eventually be turned over to Collier County.
DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES:
According to the petition, the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District, if the
Ordinance is adopted, will assume responsibility for the following:
(1) General development of the approved uses within the District;
(2) Roadways, bridges & culverts, transportation facilities, parking improvements;
(3) Street lights, landscaping and signage;
(4) Stormwater management and control;
(5) Water supply, sewer and wastewater management;
(6) Waste collection and disposal;
(7) Fire prevention and control, mosquito control;
(8) Security;
(9) Parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, educational uses;
(10) Open space improvements and conservation areas;
(11) Environmental remediation and clean -up; and
(12) Other matters related to the above tasks, inside or outside the boundaries of the District,
as required by Development Order 2011 -05 or subject to an agreement with another
government entity.
In keeping with past instructions by the Board, staff has included the following special
commitments to the Ordinance:
SECTION SEVEN: PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS
The adoption of this Ordinance is predicated upon the following: that the Petitioner, its
successors and assigns, shall (1) elect one resident of the District to the five member Board of
Supervisors at such time as residents begin occupying homes in the District, and (2) record a
Notice of Assessments containing the specific terms and conditions of any special assessments
imposed to secure bonds issued by the District, which notice shall be recorded immediately after
any such bond issuance. The Board shall retain any and all rights and remedies available at law
and in equity to enforce Petitioner's Commitments against Petitioner, its successors and assigns.
5
Packet Page -475-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The 615.2 acres, more or less, of the Hacienda Lakes CDD are designated Urban Residential
Fringe Subdistrict, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District — Sending Lands, and Mixed Use Activity
Center Subdistrict on the Collier County Future Land Use Map. Although the establishment of
this District does not constitute any development approval, the plan of development previously
approved for the subject property has been determined to be consistent with the Collier County
Growth Management Plan (GMP). Accordingly, any future petitions for rezone or development
permits will be subsequently reviewed at the time of submittal, and will be subject to the
requirements and limitations specified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC),
and will be required to be consistent with the GMP in effect at that time.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
If adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, the subject Ordinance would establish a
Community Development District (CDD) and a District Board of Supervisors. The purpose of
establishing a CDD, as per Chapter 190.005, Florida Statutes, is to establish an independent
special district as an alternative method to manage and finance basic services for community
development. The primary purpose of a CDD is to provide a long -term financing mechanism for
the subject development through Assessments, Ad Valorem Taxation or Issuance of Bonds.
The Executive Summary, and Ordinance authorized by Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, has
been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office.
Creation of a CDD provides assurance that the capital infrastructure improvements necessary in
the District are funded by bond investors and subsequent purchasers of the parcels in the District.
The proposed CDD will be receiving potable water, wastewater treatment, and solid waste
disposal services from the Collier County Public Utilities Division and will have to enter into
one or more inter -local agreements with Collier County, for such purposes. [ERP]
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Ordinance
establishing the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District.
Prepared by: Marcia R. Kendall, Senior Planner, and Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner
Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning and Zoning Department
Attachments:
Staff's response to the Six Factors (Attachment 1)
Ordinance & Exhibits `A' (Location Map w /Metes and Bounds Descriptions)
Exhibit A Legal Metes & Bounds description, including location map
Hacienda CDD Petition
Prefiled Testimonies
0
Packet Page -476-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 9.B.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the Ordinance Establishing the Hacienda
Lakes Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section 190.005(2)(a) -(f), Florida
Statutes
Meeting Date: 9/11/2012
Prepared By
Name: KendallMarcia
Title: Planner, Senior,Comprehensive Planning
6/27/2012 1:02:15 PM
Approved By
Name: BosiMichael
Title: Manager - Planning,Comprehensive Planning
Date: 8/14/2012 3:58:38 PM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, GMD P &R
Date: 8/14/2012 4:10:26 PM
Name: PepinEmily
Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO Litigation
Date: 8/15/2012 2:30:47 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date: 8/16/2012 7:52:37 AM
Name: FinnEd
Title: Senior Budget Analyst, OMB
Date: 8/16/2012 10:58:40 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 8/30/2012 11:19:20 AM
Packet Page -477-
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 9/1/2012 3:14:22 PM
Packet Page -478-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
ATTACHMENT 1
STAFF ANALYSIS RELATIVE
TO THE SIX (6) FACTORS
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FORMATION
FOR HACIENDA LAKES CDD
Background:
Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, outlines the specific content required in a Community
Development District (CDD) petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County
Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the
establishment of a CDD, as follows:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true
and correct.
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate
special - district government.
Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the six factors referenced above and makes the
following findings with regard to the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District:
1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and
correct.
Comprehensive Planning and Transportation Planning Sections of Land Development Services
Department staff, along with the staff of the County Attorney's Office, and the Public Utilities
Engineering Department, has reviewed the referenced Community Development District
petition. Based upon the review of the petition and sufficiency information, staff believes that
the information found within these documents is substantially true and correct.
1
Packet Page -479-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government
comprehensive plan.
The Hacienda Lakes P.U.D. is also an approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI
Ordinance No. 2011 -41) originally approved by the Board of County Commissioners in 2011.
As part of the approval process, the development was found to be consistent with the Growth
Management Plan in effect at that time. The entire P.U.D. designated Urban Mixed Use District,
Urban Residential Fringe Sub district, Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center #7
Sub district, and the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Districts Sending Lands, on the Collier County
Future Land Use Map. The proposed CDD would be a unit of local government established
specifically for the purpose of carrying out the approved Master Development Plan and
commitments of the Hacienda Lakes Development. The CDD does not authorize any form or
amount of development not previously approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
Therefore, staff finds that the establishment of the CDD is consistent with the Collier County
Growth Management Plan.
As to consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan, the County staff notes that the CDD
process is established within Section 190 of the Florida Statutes. The petitioner has not deviated
from the standard process, as established by the Statute. Section 187.201, Florida Statutes,
contains the text of the State's Comprehensive Plan. Subsection (2)(a) is the State Plan Goal for
Governmental Efficiency, which reads as follows:
" Goal. -- Florida governments shall economically and efficiently provide the amount and
quality of services required by the public."
Policy 2 within this goal area reads as follows:
"2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts which have uniform
general law standards and procedures and do not overburden other governments and their
taxpayers while preventing the proliferation of independent special taxing districts which do not
meet these standards."
As an "independent special taxing district ", the proposed CDD is consistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is
sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one
functional interrelated community.
The proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development District (CDD) containing 615.2 acres
more or less, if approved, would be within the size range of other CDDs within Collier County.
For instance, the Parklands Collier CDD comprised of approximately 622 acres more or less, or
Naples Heritage CDD comprised of 557 acres more or less, and the Naples Reserve CDD
comprised of approximately 688. 10 acres more or less. Based upon previous experience and the
2
Packet Page -480-
9/11/2012 Item 93.
subsequent success of other Collier County CDDs, Comprehensive Planning staff believes that
the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District meets the above criteria.
4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community
development services and facilities to the area that will be.served by the district.
The CDD petition provides alternatives available for the provision of infrastructure and services
by and for an approved development. These include, but are not limited to the following: private
funding procured by the developer; establishment of a homeowners association; establishment of
a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU); establishment of a Municipal Services Benefit Unit
(MSBU); establishment of a Community Improvement District (limited to drainage and
irrigation related improvements); establishment of a County- managed special purpose district;
or, direct County management. All of these alternative options have various legal, financial or
other limitations on their operations or do not provide a focused, compact approach to the
provision of infrastructure and services. Therefore, staff finds that establishment of the proposed
CDD is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and
facilities to the area that will be served by the proposed district.
5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
The proposed CDD cannot develop any facilities and services that are incompatible with the
surrounding area. This is because the CDD's sole purpose is to implement conditions and
developer commitments that were part of the original P.U.D. and DRI approvals. The District
Board of Supervisors will not have the legal authority to implement any facilities, services or
development that would be inconsistent with its existing development approvals.
6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special -
district government.
Based upon staff findings concerning the previous five criteria, Comprehensive Planning staff
finds that the subject area for the proposed CDD is amenable to special district government.
Furthermore, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the Ordinance, as
contained in Exhibits `A', establishing the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
(CDD).
Packet Page -481-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
ORDINANCE NO. 2012-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING AND NAMING THE
HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT;
DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT;
NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT'S BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS; PROVIDING STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND
COMMITMENTS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR
CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF
LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE. DATE.
WHEREAS, George P. Bauer, Manager on behalf of Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida
Limited Liability Company, and Marco Island Group, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
( "Petitioners "), has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT(" District"); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice has conducted a
public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered
in Section 190.005(1)(e) Florida Statutes, as required by Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes:
1. The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Sections 190.005, Florida
Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct.
2. Establishment of the proposed District is not inconsistent with any applicable element or
portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County
Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan.
3. The area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact,
and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated
community.
4. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development
services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District.
5. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities.
6. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special- district
government; and
Page 1 of 5
Packet Page -482-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
WHEREAS, it is the policy of this State, as provided for in Section 190.002(2)(c), Florida
Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law
comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and
permitting of the development to be serviced by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor
operation of such district is a development order under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the
district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and
WHEREAS, Section 190.004(3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning,
environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the
land within a community development district. Community development districts do not have the power
of a local government to adopt a comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those
terms are defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation
Act. A district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans,
ordinances, or regulations of the applicable local general- purpose government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE
This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, and other applicable
provisions of law governing county ordinances.
SECTION TWO: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The Hacienda Lakes Community Development District is hereby established within the
boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
SECTION THREE: DISTRICT NAME
The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the
"Hacienda Lakes Community Development District."
Page 2 of 5
Packet Page -483-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
SECTION FOUR: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS
The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of
Supervisors:
1. Gary Hains
3921 Prospect Avenue
Naples, FL 34104
2. Richard Swift, Jr.
Garlick Hilfiker & Swift
9115 Corsea del Fontana Way
Suite 100
Naples, FL 34109
3. Clifford Olson 4.
Colonial Square Realty
720 Goodlette Road North
Naples, FL 341202
5. Harold Webre
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
4001 Tatniami trail N., Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
Robert Mulhere
P.O. Box 1367
Marco Island, FL 34146
SECTION FIVE: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE DISTRICT
The hacienda Lakes Community Development District shall be governed by the provisions of
Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law.
SECTION SIX: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS
Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
will be duly and legally authorized to exist and exercise all of its general powers as limited by law; and
has the right to seek consent from the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the grant of
authority to exercise special powers in accordance with Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes.
SECTION SEVEN: PETITIONER'S COMMITMENTS
The adoption of this Ordinance is predicated upon the following: that the Petitioner, its
successors and assigns, shall (1) elect one resident of the District to the five member Board of
Supervisors at such time as residents begin occupying homes in the District, and (2) record a Notice of
Assessments containing the specific terms and conditions of any special assessments imposed to secure
Page 3 of 5
Packet Page -484-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
bonds issued by the District, which notice shall be recorded immediately after any such bond issuance.
The Board shall retain any and all rights and remedies available at law and in equity to enforce
Petitioner's Commitments against Petitioner, its successors and assigns.
SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid
or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate,
distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion.
SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered
to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other
appropriate word.
SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, this day of 20
ATTEST: DWIGIIT E.,. BROCK
, Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
Page 4 of 5
Packet Page -485-
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Emily R. Pepin
Assistant County Attornev
IIAC; Q -CM 11-OUS2.1i
Paine 5 of S
Packet Page -486-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
w FMA
WEI
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Exhibit "A" I
** *THIS IS NO1 A SURVEY * **
L -GAL DUSCRIPTION HAC7:ENDA LAKRS CDD BOiJNt)AXY
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 11, 13, 14, 23 & 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH. RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, KING MORE- PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMNIE?NCMG AT THE NORTHWE51 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.87'25'45 "E., FOR 100.18 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 100 FEE' EASTFR�Y OF AND PARALLEL,
TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 11 TO "rPE I,OfNTT'OFBC(;INJNING OF THE HEREIN DL.SCRIBEO PARCEL;
THENCE N.0O'5O'27 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 344,07 FEET;
THENCE 14.87'26'56 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ''HE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF
IHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTFR (1/4) FOR 1,2:55.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WEST LINE OF TIIE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE 5.00'49'13 "W., ALONG THE WEST LINE. OF SAID SOUfHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWCS'I CORNER OF SAID QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.87'25'45 "E., ALONG 1HE SOUTH IJNE OF SAID QUAR'FLR (1/4) FOR 1,336.32 °'EET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER (1/4):
THENCE CONTINUE N.87'25'45'E.. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (114) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14 (1/4) FOR 666.16 FEET
TO THE NORTHFAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)'
THENCE 5.00'47'37 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID QUARTER (1/4) FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) AL50 BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF
(1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14.;
THENCE N.87.27' 14"E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH I IALF (1 /2) FOR GGH.22 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF (112);
THENCE S.CO'47'14 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF (1/7) FOR 671.39 FEET '10, THE
SOUTHLAST CORNER O' SAID SOUTH HALF (112);
THEN-CC N.87'28'42"E., AI.ONC THE NORTH LINE OF TFIL SOUTHEAST QUARILR (1/4) OF 114E NORTHEAST
QUARTE;fe (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14 IOR 1,336.55 FEF'f 10 THE NORTHtiaSI' CORNER OF SAIL` SOUTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4);
THENCH N.87'30'06 "F_., ALONG THE NCIRIH LINE OF THE SOLJTHWCST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORIHWF:ST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 13 i OR .504.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 166,67 FEET ALONG THF; ARC OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF- 9.860.00 FEET 'fHRCUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF CO'S8'11" AND BEING SUBTI_NDFD BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS 5.16432'15 "W. FOR 166.87 FGEf;
(HENCE 5.16 "03'09 "W., FOR 370.167 FEET TO A PGiN'T OF CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 788.77 FEET AI.ONC THw ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVF: 10 THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1,580.00 FEET THROUGH A CFNT'RAL ANGLE OF 28'36'11" AND HEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS 5.30'21' 15 "W. FOR 780.60 FEET;
THENCE 5.44'39'20 "W., FOR 705..32 `E:[T;
I'HENCE N.45'20'40 "W., FOR 20.00 FF-EF TO A POINT ON A CURVE:
]HENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 146.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO TIIE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,390.00 FLET THROUGH A CENTR.At. ANGLE OF 03':30'10" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.42'54'11.1 "W. FOR 146.09 FFFI;
THCNCE 5.48'50'49 "E., FOR 20.00 FEET 10 A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 1,669.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON - TANGENTIAL CURVE, TO THE ].EFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF' 2,370.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40.2.1'513" AND BEING SUBTENDED 13Y A CHORD
WHICH SEARS 5- 20'58'11 "W. FOR 1,035,4.0 FEET;
THF."NCE 5.00'47'12 "W., FOR 127.52 FEET;
THENCE S.87'37'31 "W., FOR 20.03 FEET;
THENCE S- Qr747'12 "W„ FOR 620.44 FEET -() A POINT ON A LINE LYING 30 ]-EET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE:CIION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL L -.INC FOR 280.43 FEET;
THENCE 5.00'47'12 "W., FOR 120.18 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 90 F'EEl° SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARAI.L.EL.. LINE FOR 1,30.3 -91 FFTT TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
IHF.NCE SOUTHEASTERLY 380.23 FEET AL..ONG THE ARC OF A NON - TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 300.00 F'F'ET THROUGH A CENTRAI.. ANGt -F. OF 72'37'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.56'00'34 "E, FOR 3:55.25 FEET;
- !HENCE N.87'40'54 "E FOR 255.17 rELT TG A POINT ON A CL1Re`C;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 103.12 FEET AI..ONG THE ARC OF A NON- - TANGENTIAL C,LJRVE 10 THE RIGHT FIAVING A
RADIUS OF 685.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL .ANGi E OF 08',57'32" AND [lC ?NG SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS 5.59'3612E. FOR 103.03 FEET TO A POINT 0•- COMPOUND CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 286.17 FFFT AI,ONG 'HE ARC OF' A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1,480.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGI.F. OF 11'04'44" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.49'45'04 "E.. FOR 285.73 FEET TO A POINT Oi_ COMPOUND CURVATURE;
THENCE :OUTI- IEASTFRI_Y 267. 11:5 FEET ALONG THC ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 620.00 FELT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24'42'17" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH HEARS S.31'51'34 °E, FOR 2G'),27 17EF7 TO A POINT Or REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 204.66 FEE` A1CNG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LLI f HAVING A RADIUS
OF 280.00 FEET THROUGH A C'LI47RAL ANGLE OF 41'52'4,8" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
5.4,0'26'49 "E, FCR 200.14 FEE.( TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
t FGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON SHEET 2
I L1r,a:!, ;.v. 2012 I,,4 PM o:�ra; oer,�o not Nr,,:; 1� Loo, , 0,TA;on vRLv I
DIVAManning '?/'�!1- HAC(ENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
vl5u&IIZBGOn N7A
C
C0N5UJ,TTN G ngi
vilE-an8 -
.AL r T1, Jk Swvey ng & Mapping TTILE: HACIENDA LAKES
6610 WIU PArk DINS. 8016 Ylk, M'S "J-
"°017F°"� ",5 CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
12991 s97 -o575 PNC: (239), 597 �osre lJ.
FlOrk,n CMYI6kAIOF of Nnlbri]Hnon 1M^..,..2 rF �^(OWzl 7? c N1 F
F.A 7689 LB 6952 �d�.'i. ':>nS 25E NUM3tf.�;. OJ0150.�4.01 N1+M ^Ci:; T or % NUMiff. R. `nKQ1
Packet Page -488-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Exhibit "A"
* * *TH! S IS NOT A SURVEY "*
THLNCE SOJTHERL.Y 797.44 FEET A!.,QNG 1HE ARC OF A REVERSEi. CURVE 1 0 THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
S65.D0
FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78'06'0$" AND 01ING SUBTFNDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEAR,
S.22'20'09 "E. FOR 737.12 FEEF TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE:
THENCE SOUTHERLY 309.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF
345.00 FEET 1HROUGFI A CFNIRAL ANGLE OF 51'25'()1' AND HFING SUBTENDED HY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S.0659"36 "E. FOR 299.32 FFET TO A POINT OF REVI�RSC CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 427.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
685,00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3`+'46'1'/" AND REING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
5.16'48'57"E. FOR 42[1.75 FEET;
THENCE S.D1'O4'11 "W., FOR 400.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWF..7 QUARTER (1/4) OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWE ST OJARTER (1/4) ALSO BEING A POINT 014 THE SOUTH
I,INE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 24:
1HENCE S.57'28'21 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 2,07.5.64 FEET TO
THE SO(THWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE S.89'01'55 "W„ ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 F'OR 1,328.511 FEET TO THE SOUTTHWES1 CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QIIAR'IER (1/4);
THFNCE 5.01'18'52 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTS -;R (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (114) OF SAID °,ECT!ON 23 FCR 679.65 FEET TO THE
SOU'THCAS'F CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER
THENCE S.89'22'00 "W., THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST OUAR'IER (1/4) FOR GF >3.28 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
(HENCE N.01'14'38 "E., ALONG THE EAFiT' LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (114) FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4):
THENCE 5.89'01'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THL. SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF 'THE NOP,TFIEAST
QUARTER (1J4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 56.25 FEAT TO THE SOUTFIWFST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER (114);
1HIi_,NCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOU1'FIF.AST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST OUAR'1ER
(1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 S.89'01'58 "W., FCR 627.16 FEES`;
THENCE N.01'01'15 "E., FOR 1,699,99 FEET;
THENCE S_84'01'S8 "W., FOR 701.42 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
(1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23;
HENCE S.01'01'15 "W., Al.ONC THE.. WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) F'OR 68.:31 FEET;
THENCE 5.890158 W„ ALONG THF: SOUTH LINE OF THE. SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
(114) OF THE NORTHWES'. QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,232.97 FLET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH
HALF (1/2);
THENCE'. N.00'51'54 "E., ALONG A LINE LYING 100 FEET EAS ;TCRLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SCCTION 23 F'OR 956.27 FE'L1' TO A POINT ALONG A LINE, LYING 30 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE
NORT11 LINE' OF SAID SECTION 23: 'LINE DF
TFIENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1, .3200 FEII:.I TO A POINT ALONG THE W'ES1 L
THE NORTHEAST Q.IARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.01'01'15 "E., ALONG WEST LINE, OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR ',0.05 FEET' TO A POINT
ALONG THE. NORTH LINT OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87' 37'31 "L., AIONG THE NORTH LINE 01 SAID 5LCTION 23 FOR _ 1,337.24 FEET 10 THE NORTH
QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.00'48'00 "E., ALONG THE NORTH SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 FOR '1341.66;
TH'c'NCE S.87'34'35 "F., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF' THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWESTT QUARTER (1/4) OF
T'HE SOUTH WEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1002.75 FEET;
THENCE N.0O'46'03 "F., ALONG THE 'WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE WEST HALF' (1/2) OF THE
N0PI_HEA5T OUARTF.R (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR "340.81 FEET;
THENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG THE EAST WEST QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 FUR 668.39 FEET
THENCE N.00'48'1' "E., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE EASE HALF (1/2) OF THF.
SOUTHEAST OUARTER (1/4) OF THE NURTHW I' QUARTER (1/4) 4'OR 30.05 FF"F,T TO A POINT ALONG A LINE.
LYING 30 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL. IO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF (1/2):
THENCE N.87'31'36 "E„ AI...ONG SAID PARALLEL LINE_ FOR 289.47 TEI:I:T:
THENCE N.DO'4811 4., ALONG A LINE I.Y!NC 289 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
EAST HALF (1/2) FOR 200.33 F,_(T;
THENCE `,87'31'38`,N_ ALONG A I INL LYING: 23C FEET NCR?HERL'f AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 5.4i0
EAS1 HALF (1/2) FOR 289.47 f LET;
TIIENCE N.D0'48'11 "E., ALUNC THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAS' HALF (1 /Z) FOR 1,111.00 FEET TO A POINT
ALONG TILE SOUTH LINE OF T!IL NORTHEAST QUAKFFR (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID
SECTION 14; _
THENU S.87'28'42 "W., ALONG THE SCU-H LINE OF SAID NORIHFAST QUARTER (1; 4) FOR 1,002.41 FF T TO
T11E NOR711WEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAS1" QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE 1.200'48'45 "F., ALONG TFIE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 335.13 FEET;
THENCE 3.87'27'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE: NORTH 1 ALF (112' OF TIIL SOUTH (1/2) Or THE
NORTHWESI QUARILR (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST Q(,JARTER (1/4) FOR 1,23532 EE.ET TO A POINT ALONG A
LINE .LYING 100 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINF OF SAID SECTION '4;
THENCE. N.(704930 E., ALONG SAIL) PARALLFI LINE FOR 1,004.67 FEET TO THE POIM1I'OFBEGINNING OF "IHE
PARCEL DESCRIPED HEREIN;
CONTAINING 700.1 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESS AND EXCC•F I-ME 17ML.OWINC,711ESCRIBUD PAICL'EI_
PARCEL "A"
LEGAL. DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON SHEET, 3
.lunch 13, 2077 1 +a N,u
Packet Page -489-
Planning
D
2/11/11
12 ''
('1
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
ix! ! 1[NC.
vi9uBlizatiort
M. I I R s`, g' Mapping
"'"'.NIA
fr_ ��::
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
,i
6610 Mt wPark D,rM SWI. 200
Napk+c. Flodda 3 +109
M.
r...,r �m
COD QOUNDARY EXHIE3IT 2
{2381 597.W5 FAX; (279) 697 -0570
www.cnr6Ult- rWafAm
M W
4t )1: _f'* .
7
FI...1. ';
'i!�01
fbr':da Cerl.iiUrtoa at AUltwrlatii
EB 7683 LB 6952
(j� -.
ei.x. SCrS 76E
u') ().:001 J0.()�}.1)1 NIIMFI4.N. ()1
N1 Wt1�P
Packet Page -489-
I,xhibit "A"
* *' -THIS IS MOT A SURVEY "`
I,t-SS AND EXC:EPT'CN,L. FOLLOw(N(j DL.iCR.I13E) PARCEL
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
PARCIM.'A"
A TRACT OR PARCEL. OF LANO LYING IN SECT1pN 14, TO)WNSF'.iP �)0 SOUTH, I {ANGF 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICLI(ARLY UESCRIULU AS FOLLUWS:
13FGIN'11N(; AT THE SOUTHEASI CORNER OF THE S;OUTFiWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THF, SOUINEASr QUARTER
(1/4):
THENCK S 8737'31 "W„ ALONG THE SOUTH EjN1 OF SAIL) $OI;THWF',. f QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,262.41 FEET';
THFNC:E N.01'3413 E., FOR 779.21 FEET TO .A POIN' OF' C'URVA -UM.;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 111.22 FEET A,_ONG THE ARC O(' A 7ANG�.NrIA! CURVE TO 1'HE RIGHf HAViNC A
RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET T- ,ROUGH A CENTRAL ANG; F, OF 57'%5'46" AND HFING SL)0TENI.FD BY A CHORD
WMCH HEARS tJ.3D'32`U6 "E. FOR 106.54 FEFJT;
THI, NCE N.89' 12'00 "W., FOE, 58.03 FEET TO A PCINT ALONG A UNE ; YING 80 FEET EASTERLY OF AND
PARALLEL TO THE NORTH !SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) JNE. OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.00'4H00E., ALONG SAID 'PARAI_I.F.I. LINE'. FOR 1,757.87 F'EE`T TO A POINT OF CURVAT'JRC:
THENCE NORTHEAS7r.RLY 22. 71 FEET ALONG TkH7 ARC UI: A TANGENTIAL, CURVE TO THE RIGH "(' HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15.00 FEE:) THROUGH A CENTRA!_ ANC;L.F, OF 86'43'4D" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY .A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.44'09'49 "E. I -OR 20,60 FEET;
THENCE N.01728'22 °W„ FOR 10.00 FFFT TO A POINT ALONC A UNF L`(ING .30 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALL.LL
TO THE CAST WEST QUARTER (1/4) LINE OF SM) SECTION 14;
;HE;NCE N.8T.51'38 °E., ALONG SAID PARAI_LEI„ !.1NE FOR 632.81 FEET TO A POINT' OF CURVAIURL;
TH NCE. EASTERLY 192.95 FEEL AL.ONC THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL. CURVE TO THE LEF HAVING A RADIUS OF
1,0()0.00 FEFI" THROUGH A CF.NT'RAL ANGI.F OF 11'O:5'18" AND E3f.!NC SUB`ENDI:D BY A CaIQRO WHICH BEARS
N 81'59'59 "E. FOR 192.65 F'f _T TO A POINI' OF REVERSE L'RVATURE;
TIICNC E EASTERLY 181,37 FErl ALONG CIE. AR OF A REvL RSE' CI)RVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING; A RADIUS OF
94000 FEET THROUGH A CEN'RAI, A.NI G. OF 11 O:i't8" AND BEING :�USIEiNDED qY A CHORD WI -iiCsi BEARS
N.81'59'59 "E. FOR 181.09 GEi,.TI
THr,NCE N.87'31'38 "F., FOR 10f,,.71 11, FI
THENCE S.04'44'35 "E-, FOR 0.82 FEET;
THENCE N.d9'44'23 °E., FOR 164.31 F T 70 "ME. NORTHWE' 1,(1i2NER OF TI -If WES7 HALF (1/)) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARIL!i (1 /4) OF IHL NORTHEA7,T QUARTER (1/4) OF THE 30UTI-1EASF �)UART'ER (1/4) OF ;3At7
SECTION 14;
HENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG TI -IE NORTH LINE OF SAID W4_'51 ' HALF (1/2) FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE
NORIHLAST CORNER OF SAID WESL HALF (1/2):
THEN(;F 5.00'47'03 "W., ALONG I'H- FAST UNE OF riAlr) WEST HAI.F (1; 2) FOR (371.53 FEET TO THE SO1JT)iE.A,T
CORNER OF' SAID WE`;I` HALF (1/2);
1't -1ENCE 5.87'33'06 "W., ALONG THF S-00 I LINO OF SAID WEST HA;F (1 /z) FOR 5.70 .-F'E'r TO A °OINT ON A
CURVE;
THENCE; SOUTHERLY 1,302.67 FEET ALONG 111E ARC OF A NION- TANGENTIAL, CURVE TO THE LIiFT IIAVINC A
RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROJGI' < CCNiRAL ANGLE OF 2° - 1('04" AND BEING `i()BTF'NDED DY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.1; 32'13"W, FCR 7,2 &b.:S:. FEET TO A FCINI A,_ONC THE EAST LINE OF THE OMIIWEST
OIJAR'T:R (1/4) M TIIE.. S0U711EAM :0 ME:N !1/4);
7HENCE S.00'47'14 "W., N,.ONf TIIE E.4,r I N''. Cif SAID SOIJ'rHWE!';T QUARTER (1/4) '=Cl2 786.35 F'"E:1 I) NIL
POINT OF OC&NNINC OF iH,- PARCEL DESCRIdf D III-REIN;
CONTAINIINC 84.9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,.
- ._... -._.: - lam' l 1 W...'_.:y.._._..__ ._............._
NLJ IACL A. WA ' FRGI"F,- .S.UNA'r_, �A .D $I)RVEYOR LS# 5301 OAFE..
NO'I- VALID WTN411T THF? "': >IGNAT1_1RE A;40 THE ORfGINAI RAI`'nF f)
SI 'AI OF A FLORIDA LICEI IS-T-L) :SURVLI'C I AND MAr'FT12.
M,•rri, r.D, 7C'? 1'14 RM t;. \,200'; :'O1'0 O1 01 Hrrvie•v7 Fokss f.C1J \(70Ci..3 Cn1,1 0 „.� %(�I' :I, RFL' 01 \0:(O 1J000I I tilcf) 4 q
Panning
2/1
I;_., 4/11
1 r
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
Visualintlon
`
CONSULTING Cis Iftin -ling
.a r. r u JL Survcpng &Mapping
" ?
111 LE: HACIENDA LAKES
6810 Wllow Pa,k D�i�e. SWte 200
Na01m, F-r 34109
.,. � _a.-
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
\
123915970675 FAX (z39)5570570
waw" vlt -r
_.i A W _.
•.-
t'(() f:r O;;)!`JO.J4' n '. EET I ca.h ✓KO)
NII� HFIt. NJMC7E17 •' 6F NLiM9Lfi:
.mm
RoftoCe"Ifcal &S tN A"Ilrotlz7:i"n
E13 7663 LD 6952
�.
''.,C.> .fit'
Packet Page -490-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Exhibit "A"
***THIS. IS NOT A SURD, /cY * **
C'W: INE SECTION 11 i
�I NB7'28'56�3`i.95' [ 1/4
�— 1100, 1/4 00R. 7
! S, 1/7 S. 1/2 5 -W. :/4 "'T
ry S.W- 1/4 LESS w. 100' L4 ...
—l.1 N87.25'45 L 7
,0 111 /4 14 ! 14
TIJN '
N, I..INE. iEi, ._._.._. _ 13.36.32
F',87'2,9'45" W a
: 15 14
\-----P-,--
...... . >8T2.5'45"
I. OB
N,W. 1/4
N,W, 1/4
i ( N. 1 /',, N.W. 1/4 N.N'.� + .... �
//�� W. 100'
rf,, N E' /4
p —rOC I N.F. 1/4
. O N -W. 1/4'
N.W- CORNER
SECTION 14 r
HACIENDA LAKES N87'27'14 "E,. -..
ra _._ ....._._..- ....._ _I CDD BOUNDARY i 568.22' i
...._ _ __.._ 700.1 ACRES S
N,
1/7 S 1/2 �. ul
Z N.W. 1/4 NW, 1/4 ^. 1 /2. N,E.
LES5 W. 100 j 1/4 N.E. 1/4 W
1.
,.... L23
N
C r.
f I \[W LINE r.ZION 14 --
- 5A/ "18'42 "W 1002.41'
IV
LINE "ABLE n T_
1
I,INE BEARING LENGTH ___ r
L1 N87'25'45 C 100 I
l2 N00'50'27 °E 344.(17' C 112 1.17 I .w. ,/4
5 G
R7 1/4 N.W. N.E. I/4
1/a
j L3 S00'49'13 "W 347.92' o 0 3
L4 N67'25'45"E 668.16' GRAPHIC SCALE
! I L18 I N00 48 1 1 L 30.05' ?, L20
t
1 g Na! s1 3H E I 28 a 4 / LCC�r CENTER SFCIION l4
1 - FAST /WEST 14"fR 121 � / I hI 14 )H9 �.,-__ L26 AC16 L19 _r15 coR. L20 N00'4511 E 200.53' I E9 _ -. _ '3B "E
� I _ S8T31';iH'W 289.4%' 658.391
L77 s
I61 141 --C14 o w
! j L22 N00'48'45 "E 345' 13' EAST/WEST A
QUARTER LINE
j ' L23 S87'27'51i'1V 1236.32 I I HO' srC1oN 14
� I -
124 N01%54'! -S F 779 21' p
?5
N89'1 2 00 W 53.03_ w 1/2 f,.. 17 E 1/2
r
....._ -- V F '/4 NE, 1/ N_ 1 /4 f1 N.W. ,/F 1
..�. ., S W / Hl. 14 S.W. 1/4 I- S.E. 1 /4 T
L-26 NC? 2R72 W I 1 OAQ '-I
j I N8731'38'E 632,81' LESS EXCEPT
L27 PARCEL A
2
84.9 ACRES
i I I I Kt
o
WEST LINE OF THE E
i 1
1/2 OF 'W 112 OF
NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 —i. _.._.._........_. _ ._
5OUT11 LINE, OF THE j 58734 3J W i0 NOWIH /SOUTH
NY! ;/4 OF SW 1/4 1p OUAR7"F.R UryE
5LCTION 14
C FN FAR. -F
CURVE LLN 1H RADIUS ''ELT' HGRU iLAKIrJG CHORD 4J
C - 1 11 71' 0.00'j 8 55'e 6 � N30' 52'() D L 106.54' ¢ -C13 7
I I Ct 3, 1 1 1 �7..' 1 10 UO' � �
/._.. X4.3'40 N4`'C�51'40 "F :iaEO rj S.L". 1/4
iC15 192.915 1C00,00' i 1'0;5'18" N81 -s1.) a9 "E 1 '92.Er ci
,
_ - . .. ... ,.....if- —
j FF SHEUTS 1, 2 & 3 F,)R r -EGAL DrSCRIP -ION MATCH LINE - SEE; SHEET 7
M,„• *„ d10. 20'2 ,:!4 Pm
�i7C T/11" 01 H ---rt. % 4-1
n4 1 1
CLIENI
vimlalg. 1. HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
Visllai;zatlOn :1:a��.
CONSULTING Cavil En0octing 1 = .5900 " ".
i %6 T r.L Y. Surmying & >1 sM� i,g F. a- TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
Bo '10 Willow Park DIWA, SLOW X10 � • � • `t
"'0S7,SFA "3a109 - CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2
(:39) 591 -0575 FAX (239)697-0578 Jt4 A. W •
F. d. Camp -. 0AW—iiatlon 1 "n I +ut PR(`,!rCf cNEE'1 /} _ 7 FIi.E KD1
14f)75G9 LE 6952 SOS ere wuurr. -r;: 0500.04.01 INUUU(::rt. NuwwuER; •`'
Packet Page -491-
Exhibit "A"
***THIS IS NOT; A SURVEY'
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
�—SECTION CORNO N
W -`. E
250' boo,
GRAPHIC SCALE
1'. 500'
T:
0
2 —
1,187 2S 4
Lu
W 7!1 HACIENDA LAKES
Z CDD BOUNDARY
700.1 ACRES
.-I
LINE TABLE
LINE
1/4 N.C. 1/4
LENGTH
L25
I C2-
105,71'
!.29
!;Q4'44'35"E
0.82'
i-31
I N87'31'31
L32
S87-33'.1015"W
5.70,
L33
500-47-14"W
1136Z5'
1-32—
i
Pr
LAST/WC T
—LESS & FXCFPT
—29
1-
[.3 C)
Q13A-TER'1.1Nr
SECT!ON 14
PARCEL A
Ilk
84,9 ACRES
C15..
L31
C4
t.
CORVE, TABLL
LINE TABLE
LINE
HEARING
LENGTH
L25
Nf3/*31'38"E
105,71'
!.29
!;Q4'44'35"E
0.82'
i-31
I N87'31'31
L32
S87-33'.1015"W
5.70,
L33
500-47-14"W
1136Z5'
Packet Page -492-
---L7
1-32—
t/4
—LESS & FXCFPT
PARCEL A
84,9 ACRES
C4
CORVE, TABLL
C -1 W F
ITNG7H
RADIUS
DELTA
(-,J-I()RD BEARING
CHORD
CI
0,58,11"
516732'15 "W
166.87'
C2_
7813.1-77'
1580-00'
75*36'11"
630'21'15 "W
780,60'
C3
11611'
2.M.00'
3'3010"
S 4 2'5 415 "W
146.00'
"if,
181 .37'
940.00'
11*03'IW*+N81'59'59"E
181.09'
r
29*3004
1 ;W
11,91333-
MATCH
LINE- - SPE SHEET 6
SEE SHEETS *. 2 -k 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
uucb 20, 2012 J 11 !W lo .�k-
C1.
I E N,
IDXXTINC.
Pinnning,
A
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
Visualimfian
CONSULTING Cint Fn&ipwdnj;
5DO,
AL %. V
VA. JL Survr-ying & Majl;ing
riTLE:
HACIENDA LAKES
6610MMI.PWX DrW, UNO 200
M.S.•j:--
N.P11., --
'.HE: KL I! Hy
CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT
2)
Ing) 597-057S F": 1:991597.0579
A W.,--
Holk"a Conklin of okulhonzall"
,q( I.,
-7
-1� OF
Fu t.
1`W1vnCrp
952
ES M, 11A 6 1
A"I", "'05 "Eir
Packet Page -492-
Exhibit "A"
N,W 1/4
N.E. 1/4
5w. 1/4
CURVE TAE' E
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
N
W + E
s
250' 500,
GRAPH n, SCALE
I'. "no,
6
U'URVE IFNG'M RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD
C 5 M0.23' 300.rjC1' 72*37*04" S56*00'34"E 355,28'
G6 103.12' 8':5T32" 559'36'12 "L 103.03'
('7 286.17' 1480.00' 11-04'44" 549'45'04 "E 285,73'
C8 257.33' 620.00' 2,4. 42'17" S31 ".11'34 "F 265.27'
C') 204.66' 4 1-52'48" S40-26'4q"[ 200.14'
Clo
7q7.44' 5,95.00' 7!5*06'08 2 - 20'09' E 737.12'
309.60' -145, (,C!' 51'2.5'[! 1 S08 59'36 "E 299 32'
7 A27.6T 685.0C' 3,",. 4 C)' 7 S I 6'48*57"E 420,75'
...... .........
SEE sHECIS 1, 2 3 FOR LEGAL DES",RIFTION
reach 20. 2(,!2 1 71 Iv
TNC. Alf C� ![Nl:
Planning 11/04/11
.A - HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
"DIVA Vigualimtion '�-L I
CONSULTING Civil Engine
-AL 11L 7 T4 JL Surveyrng Engine T)TLE: HACIENDA LAKES
..- ....-)'!M e_` ' J
N- 0575 34109
(230) 597-0575 FAX: (M) "7-0578 CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2)
r1wida PEP
F 7 IJUA, OK�,1j
EB 76 L86952
50r 26E
Packet Page -493-
w
w
** *THIS I
IS ;NOT A SURVEY"*
MATCH' -
SEE SHEET 5
2" 2 4
ti-- SECTION T'o
—s C ON
Co
FR L13
A
POB PARCEL N
N87- 3'/'31 "E
s CORNER Of- S.W. 1
1303.91'
1/4 S.E. 1/4
LESS & EXCEPT
PARCEL A C
C'
64.9 ACRES
NC
HACIENDA LAKES
CDD BOUNDARY
700.1 ACRES
NW. 1/4
z
F 1/4
N.E. 1/4
1�24
1328.51'
23 12 4 1
L(NE TABLE I
I
LINE B
BF.WNG, L
LENGM I
I. -11 N
N8 7*37'31 "F 2
280.4.3'
L12 S
S00'47'12"W 1
120.15'
-9— N
15 1
N,C. 1/4 N.W.
13 N
NB7'40'54 "E 2
255.17'
1 1
114 .C., 1/4
L14 S
S01'04'I 1
115 °
°99- ?2'00 "W 6
662,28'
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
N
W + E
s
250' 500,
GRAPH n, SCALE
I'. "no,
6
U'URVE IFNG'M RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD
C 5 M0.23' 300.rjC1' 72*37*04" S56*00'34"E 355,28'
G6 103.12' 8':5T32" 559'36'12 "L 103.03'
('7 286.17' 1480.00' 11-04'44" 549'45'04 "E 285,73'
C8 257.33' 620.00' 2,4. 42'17" S31 ".11'34 "F 265.27'
C') 204.66' 4 1-52'48" S40-26'4q"[ 200.14'
Clo
7q7.44' 5,95.00' 7!5*06'08 2 - 20'09' E 737.12'
309.60' -145, (,C!' 51'2.5'[! 1 S08 59'36 "E 299 32'
7 A27.6T 685.0C' 3,",. 4 C)' 7 S I 6'48*57"E 420,75'
...... .........
SEE sHECIS 1, 2 3 FOR LEGAL DES",RIFTION
reach 20. 2(,!2 1 71 Iv
TNC. Alf C� ![Nl:
Planning 11/04/11
.A - HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
"DIVA Vigualimtion '�-L I
CONSULTING Civil Engine
-AL 11L 7 T4 JL Surveyrng Engine T)TLE: HACIENDA LAKES
..- ....-)'!M e_` ' J
N- 0575 34109
(230) 597-0575 FAX: (M) "7-0578 CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2)
r1wida PEP
F 7 IJUA, OK�,1j
EB 76 L86952
50r 26E
Packet Page -493-
w
w
SEE sHECIS 1, 2 3 FOR LEGAL DES",RIFTION
reach 20. 2(,!2 1 71 Iv
TNC. Alf C� ![Nl:
Planning 11/04/11
.A - HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
"DIVA Vigualimtion '�-L I
CONSULTING Civil Engine
-AL 11L 7 T4 JL Surveyrng Engine T)TLE: HACIENDA LAKES
..- ....-)'!M e_` ' J
N- 0575 34109
(230) 597-0575 FAX: (M) "7-0578 CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2)
r1wida PEP
F 7 IJUA, OK�,1j
EB 76 L86952
50r 26E
Packet Page -493-
w
w
Packet Page -493-
w
w
***THIS
I !;ECTION CORNER
glloN 7.1
�212,� N
C�
N 1/2 N W 1/4 N.W.
0, 1/4 LLSS WEST 100'
z
—WFSI LINE SECTION 23 -
I
E. '/2 N.W. 1/4 NA
100' 1/4 LESS W, loo. LI 6
S89'O1'S8 "W 1232.97'
9, 1/2 N.W. 1/4 N.W. 1/4
1/4 COr.
s
+
tt,A_r'HlC SCALE
1.=500'
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Exhibit "A"
S NOT A SURVEY***
LINE TABLE
LING. 3 F NG LENGTH
—7—
L i u sol 01 15 68 31,
_ __ _.—i ..
117 NO IT I " 5'E' I .30,95,
SLE SHELIS 1, 2 & 3 F•OR -GAL l,)E`,CRIPT!0N
. I
MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET
INC.
unning
ry -
, : /04/11–
""°"r
CnLTIL t
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLE.) LLC
fi
isuali7A on
1 500'
1262.41
2 62
.
N8_r37'311 T
14
23
31 "W
5 57' 3 7'31 "W
L.l T
CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2)
7
Nr)ryH 1/4 UtC_
ESS
: -�i,(-;-T
7 , 7
INZu.31 R 0
NUM SK01
SIMT(ON
EXCEPT PARCEL
No61,.F,14.
A 84,9 ACRES
9
F.
L. 1/4 N.W.
/A
WN 1/4 N.F. 1/4
HACIENDA LAKES
I
COD BOUNDARY
V)
701.42'
700.1 ACRES
C'
in
S. i/7 N'N.
W
S,W 1/4 N F. 1/4
100 L FES O.R.
o
2197 PIS 2G57
LC;" OP :s24'
COR,
5' 72
23 664.25'
—7777=-n
589'01' 58 "w
23
z
LINE TABLE
LING. 3 F NG LENGTH
—7—
L i u sol 01 15 68 31,
_ __ _.—i ..
117 NO IT I " 5'E' I .30,95,
SLE SHELIS 1, 2 & 3 F•OR -GAL l,)E`,CRIPT!0N
ow9
m—h '70. 2(117 I
INC.
unning
ry -
, : /04/11–
""°"r
CnLTIL t
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLE.) LLC
fi
isuali7A on
1 500'
CON.S ULTIN G CiNll rn9i Tmng
AL III, V VA. JL SurvCY4 & Mapping
.
HACIENDA LAKES
N,vg..
CDD BOUNDARY (EXHIBIT 2)
W9097.0575 FAX: (239) 547-078
ft — ."'
FWIW Ca'"CM-1 AWIWIfi-n
M. A,W.
_�C, �;_,
110.04.01
050,11
: -�i,(-;-T
7 , 7
INZu.31 R 0
NUM SK01
FFI 70$3 LB 6952
'j:'50S 29E
No61,.F,14.
Packet Page -494-
Exhibit „A" 9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
PROJECT LOCA TION MAP
Packet Page -495-
XIT
�1 -75
II
�J
J
Y
4111 ��
E,
BECK BLVD
k -
''
ce
50 26
s
I
I�
26 ��'
��;�,0
con _ 1
z
n
4 2
---27 A
12
50 26
/
10
PROJECT '
1-7 OU UU'-llu D ID
LOCATION
I �-
� ^tea o� ❑>?rn =�.�:1
6M
5
THE L DS j
wA
50 26 j
13
I I
RATTLES I
.
i - -- I -- 7v
K I r_i
i
HAMMOC l
� I
6 i
i i
� 26 r
a1ppH
OHN RD
=, I
I N
I
�Y
i
I
_ O I I PALM RD
„-..:..,
ABAL
V ,,;,h
50 26
w
\
PROJECT LOCA TION MAP
Packet Page -495-
March 23, 2012
Board of County Commissioners
Collier County
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: Petition to Establish Hacienda Lakes Community Development District (Letter of
Purpose)
Dear Members of the Board of County Commissioners,
In connection with the pending Petition to Establish Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District, we have been asked to identify the benefits to Collier County and its residents that will
accompany the establishment of a community development district ("CDD ") for the Hacienda
Lakes community. Theses benefits include the following:
1. The CDD will provide and maintain certain public infrastructure for the Hacienda
Lakes community. For example, the CDD will own the storm water management system serving
the community, and, therefore, neither Collier County nor other public agency will be
responsible for the maintenance of such infrastructure.
2. Only the residents of the Hacienda Lakes community, who will be benefiting from the
CDD financed infrastructure serving the Hacienda Lakes community, will pay for such
infrastructure. Thus, the public generally will bear no financial burden relating to the costs of
installing such infrastructure.
3. Throughout the State of Florida, the establishment of CDDs has typically resulted in
high quality, well - managed communities having a well - maintained infrastructure. The existence
of such high quality, well- managed communities benefits the residents of those communities, as
well as the residents of surrounding communities and the public generally.
Packet Page -496-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER., P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Kevin G. Coleman
NORTHERN TRUST BANK BUILDING
Linda C. Brinkman
Craig D. Grider
Richard D. Yovanovich
4001 TAMIAMi TRAIL NORTH
Matthew M. Jackson
Edmond E. Koester
SUITE 300
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103
Jeffrey J. Bcihoff
William M. Burke
239435 -3535
Harold J. Webre
Gregory L. Urbancic
Matthew L. Grabinski
239435 -1218 FACSIMILE
Caroline M. Magliolo
www cvklawfirm.com
Charles A. B. Thomson
David Kerem
Michael D. Gentzle
Writer's Email:
Of Cggnsell
Kenneth R. Johnson
ryovanovich @cyklawfirm.com
March 23, 2012
Board of County Commissioners
Collier County
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: Petition to Establish Hacienda Lakes Community Development District (Letter of
Purpose)
Dear Members of the Board of County Commissioners,
In connection with the pending Petition to Establish Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District, we have been asked to identify the benefits to Collier County and its residents that will
accompany the establishment of a community development district ("CDD ") for the Hacienda
Lakes community. Theses benefits include the following:
1. The CDD will provide and maintain certain public infrastructure for the Hacienda
Lakes community. For example, the CDD will own the storm water management system serving
the community, and, therefore, neither Collier County nor other public agency will be
responsible for the maintenance of such infrastructure.
2. Only the residents of the Hacienda Lakes community, who will be benefiting from the
CDD financed infrastructure serving the Hacienda Lakes community, will pay for such
infrastructure. Thus, the public generally will bear no financial burden relating to the costs of
installing such infrastructure.
3. Throughout the State of Florida, the establishment of CDDs has typically resulted in
high quality, well - managed communities having a well - maintained infrastructure. The existence
of such high quality, well- managed communities benefits the residents of those communities, as
well as the residents of surrounding communities and the public generally.
Packet Page -496-
t
March 23, 2010
2
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
4. The CDD will contribute to construction of public road improvements including
improvements of the extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the improvements to The Lords
Way, constructing two lanes of Benefield Road and intersection improvements at Collier
Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. These road improvements will benefit the residents
of the Hacienda Lakes community, as well as the residents of surrounding communities and the
traveling public generally.
Accordingly, Collier County and its residents will benefit from the establishment of Hacienda
Lakes Community Development District. Should you require further information, please do not
hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
Richard Yovanovich
RDY /dq
Packet Page -497-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN RE: AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
PETITION
Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and Marco
Island Group, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (collectively, "Petitioner "), by and
through the undersigned attorney, petition the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "Commission") to adopt an ordinance for the following
purposes: (i) establishing and recognizing a community development district ( "District ") created
and chartered by the Uniform Community Development District Act of Florida, Chapter 190,
Florida Statutes on the real property proposed in this Petition; (ii) acknowledging that the
uniform charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes, and as
referenced by Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes shall apply to the District; (iii) designating the
initial Board of Supervisors for the District; (iv) designating the proposed land area within which
the District may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities, services,
improvements, and projects; (v) consenting to the exercise by the District pursuant to Section
190.012(2)(a), Florida Statutes of the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct,
enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for parks and
facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; (vi) consenting to
the exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(d), Florida Statutes of the power to
finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate
and maintain additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for security, including, but not
limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars,
when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however that the District may not
exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general purpose
government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District's boundaries; and
(vii) consenting to the exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(e), Florida Statutes
of the power to control and eliminate mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health
importance; and
Packet Page -498-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
In support thereof, Petitioner submits as follows:
1. Location. and Size. The proposed District is located on Collier Boulevard in
unincorporated Collier County, Florida, and contains approximately 615.2 acres. Exhibit
1 depicts the general location of the project. The metes and bounds description of the
external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2.
2. Landowner Consent. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 and made a part hereof is the
written consent of the owners of 100% of the real property to be included within the
District.
3. Name. The proposed name of the District to be established is Hacienda Lakes
Community Development District.
4. Initial Board Members. The five persons designated to serve as initial members of
the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District are as follows:
1. Gary Hains 2. Richard Swift Jr.
3921 Prospect Ave Garlick, Hilfiker & Swift
Naples, FL 34104 9115 Corsea del Fontana Way
Suite 100
Naples, FL 34109
3. Clifford Olson
Colonial Square Realty
720 Goodlette Road North
Naples, FL 34102
5. Harold Webre
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A
4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
4. Robert Mulhere
PO Box 1367
Marco Island, FL 34146
All of the above listed persons are residents of the State of Florida and citizens of
the United States of America.
Packet Page -499-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
5. Existing Land Uses. The existing land uses within and abutting the proposed
District are depicted in Exhibit 4. The adjacent property to the west is zoned Collier
Boulevard. The adjacent property to the east is zoned agricultural. The adjacent property
to the north is zoned agricultural, Hammock Park Commerce Center PUD, and McMullen
PUD. The adjacent property to the south is zoned First Assembly Ministries Education
and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, Collier Regional Medical Center PUD and
Agricultural. The lands within the proposed District are zoned Hacienda Lakes MPUD on
the Future Land Use Plan Map.
6. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location and extent of the
public and private land uses proposed within the District are shown on Exhibit 5. These
proposed land uses are consistent with the state comprehensive plan and Collier County
Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 6 shows the proposed development plan for the lands
within the District.
7. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit 7 shows the existing major trunk
water mains and sewer connections serving the lands within the District. Exhibit 7 also
depicts the major outfall canals and drainage system for the lands within the proposed
District.
8. District Facilities and Services. The Petitioner presently intends for the District to
participate in the funding and construction of the following described improvements:
a. Stormwater management;
b. Water distribution;
C. Wastewater collection
d. Rights -of -way;
e. Security;
f. Open space improvements.
Exhibit 8 describes the type of services and facilities Petitioner presently expects the
District to fund, construct and install. The estimated costs of construction are also set
Packet Page -500-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
forth in Exhibit 8. The proposed timetable for construction is shown in Exhibit 9. These
are good faith estimates but are subject to change. Actual construction timetables and
expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in economic
conditions upon costs such as labor, services, materials, interest rates and market
conditions.
9. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit 10 is a Statement of Estimated
Regulatory Costs prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541,
Florida Statutes.
10. Petitioner and Authorized Agent. The Petitioner is collectively Wilton Land
Company, LLC whose address is 206 Dudley Road, Wilton, CT 06897 and Marco Island
Group, LLC whose address is 206 Dudley Road, Wilton, CT 06897. Copies of all
correspondence and official notices should also be sent to the authorized agent for the
Petitioner:
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
Phone: 239-435-3535/Fax: 239 - 435 -1218
Email: ryovanovich(a�,cyklawfirm.com
11. Pursuant to Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes, Petitioner additionally requests
that the ordinance establishing the District also consent to the exercise by the District
pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(a),(d) and (e), Florida Statutes of the power to finance,
fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate
and maintain additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for the following: (i)
parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; (ii)
security, including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion -
detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper govenunental agencies;
provided, however that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract
with the appropriate local general purpose government agencies for an increased level of
such services within the District's boundaries; and (iii) control and elimination of
mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance. Pursuant to amendments to
Packet Page -501-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Section 190.012, Florida Statutes adopted in the 2007 legislative session, said special
powers can now be authorized by the Commission at the time the District is established.
12. This Petition is to establish the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
should be granted for the following reasons:
a. Establishment of the District and all land uses and services planned within
the proposed District are not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion
of the state comprehensive plan or the effective local government comprehensive
plan.
b. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a unified plan of
development that has been or will be approved by Collier County. It is of a
sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be development as
one functional and interrelated community.
C. The proposed District will be the best alternative available for delivering
community development services and facilities to the area to be served without
financially impacting persons residing outside the District. Establishment of the
District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed,
allows for a more efficient use of resources.
d. The community development services and facilities of the District will be
compatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community
development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District
will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the
operation and maintenance of the District services and facilities in the future.
e. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate
special- district government.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Commission to do the following:
A. Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local, public, non- emergency
and information gathering public hearing for the adoption of an ordinance hearing pursuant to the
requirements of Section 190.005(2)(b), Florida Statutes, on the subject of whether to grant this
Packet Page -502-
9/11/2012 Item 9. B.
Petition for the establishment on the proposed land area of the Hacienda Lakes Community
Development District and to enact the ordinance establishing the District.
B. Grant this Petition and adopt the ordinance to establish the District including the
following: (i) an express designation in the ordinance of the land to be served by the District; (ii)
the name of the District; (iii) the initial Board of Supervisors of the District; (iv) an express
recognition in the ordinance, by statutory citation, that the uniform and exclusive general law
charter of the District was created by the Florida Legislature in Sections 190.006 through
190.041, Florida Statutes; (v) consent to the exercise by the District pursuant to Section
190.012(2)(a), Florida Statutes of the power to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct,
enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for parks and
facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; (vi) consent to the
exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(d), Florida Statutes of the power to
finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate
and maintain additional systems, facilities and basic infrastructure for security, including, but not
limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars,
when authorized by proper governmental agencies; provided, however that the District may not
exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general purpose
government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District's boundaries; and
(vii) consent to the exercise by the District pursuant to Section 190.012(2)(e), Florida Statutes of
the power to control and eliminate mosquitoes and other arthropods of public health importance.
Finally, the ordinance shall provide that with regard to any future specific consent by the County
to exercise by the District of any other special powers granted expressly in its general law
charter, the legal existence and authority of the District, as created by State law and as
established by this ordinance, shall have thereby been decided.
Packet Page -503-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 134 day of
rhall L , 2012.
Wilton Land Company, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company
By: l
George . Bauer, Manager
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this bK1 day of
20121 b George P. Bauer, Manager of Wilton Land Company, LLC,
who is personally known to me [ V or produced as identification.
Notary Public Signature: � .1 I%1
Printed Name: �h&rl p ff,-- /h . GUtLiILifP
Notary Stamp: ..+ Notary Public State M Florida
Qf"') Charlotte M Walkup
My Cor"t"i%ainn EE 156195
Expires 01171IV116
Marco slan 3roup. LC,
a Florida limited liability company
By: _
Georg . Bauer, Manager
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this /3K-- day of
gives- 1 2012, by George P. Bauer, Manager of Marco Island Group, LLC
who is personally known to me [ L-f or produced as identification.
Notary Public Signature: • / -W-kW
Printed Name: ZVI Af %a f*2 X, (ii%
Notary Stamp:
,Psr &4AL Notary M state of Florida
Charlotte tte M Walkup
+�• M Comm"
ft Commion EE 156145
Expires 01!2112016
Packet Page -504-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
C
IDS
�a
1
•, THE L •
y 50 26 F-
_m 1
RATTLOES
HAMM
FE 6
RD
mwa�o nuu+unl -� �eitx
EXHIBIT 1- PRO 197r'T 1.00A T/ON MAP
Packet Page -505-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
** *THIS IS NOT A SURVEY * **
LEGAL DESCRIPTION HACIENDA LAKES CDD BOUNDARY
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 11, 13, 14, 23 & 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N,87'25'45 "E., FOR 100.18 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 100 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL
TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 11 TO THE POINTOFBEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THENCE N.00'50'27 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 344.07 FEET;
THENCE N.87'28'56 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,235.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE S.00'49'13 "W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.87'25'45 "E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,336.32 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE CONTINUE N.8T25'45 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14 (1/4) FOR 668.16 FEET
TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE S.00.47'37 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID QUARTER (1/4) FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF
(1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.87'27'14 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF (1/2) FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF (1/2);
THENCE 5.00'47'14 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF (1/2) FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF (1/2);
THENCE N.87'28'42 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 14 FOR 1,336.55 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.87'30'06 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 13 FOR 504.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 166.87 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 9,860.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'58'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.16'32'15 "W. FOR 166.87 FEET;
THENCE S.16'03'09 "W., FOR 370.15 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 788.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1,580.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28'36'11" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS 5.30'21'15 "W. FOR 780.60 FEET;
THENCE S.44'39'20 "W., FOR 705.32 FEET;
THENCE N.45'20'4D "W., FOR 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 146.11 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,390.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'30'10" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.42'54'15 "W. FOR 146.09 FEET;
THENCE S.48'50'49 "E., FOR 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 1,669.72 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,370.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40'21'59" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS 5.20'58'11 "W. FOR 1,635.40 FEET;
THENCE S.00'47'12 "W., FOR 127.52 FEET;
THENCE S.87'37'31 "W., FOR 20.03 FEET;
THENCE S.00'47'12 "W., FOR 620.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 30 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 280.43 FEET;
THENCE S.00'47'12 "W., FOR 120.18 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 90 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1,303.91 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 380.23 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 72'37'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.56'00'34 "E. FOR 355.28 FEET;
THENCE N.87'40'54 "E., FOR 255.17 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 103.12 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON - TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 685.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08'37'32" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.59'36'12 "E. FOR 103.03 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 286.17 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1,480.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'04'44" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.49'45'04 "E. FOR 285.73 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 267.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 620.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24'42'17" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.31'51'34 "E. FOR 265.27 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 204.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 280.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41'52'48" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S.40'26'49 "E. FOR 200.14 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON SHEET 2
March 20, 2072 1:14 PM 0: \2005 \050150.04.01 HaN da lakes con \0003 Legal Deser %nti,n \REV 0 ; \050150040)3K0l.d g
"DIXA NC.
DATE
12/14/11
CLIENT:
Planning
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
scAEe,
N/A
V13ua11zauon
CONSULTING CivilBThmmg
DR- �
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
i t VAL JL Surveying & Mapping
6610 Witim Perk Drive. Suite 200
Napes. 4109
M . S.J.
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
�HECM. e-:
FAX:(
zs9) 597-W5 Fix: (M) W-0578
vn�rx.consufi•rwa.com
M.A.W.
sec. TNP, are
se'.•cnc ore
PROJECT
NI IMRFR. 050150.04,01
$HEFT
NtIMB� "R; OF 7
FILE
NUMBER: SKO1
Florida C 0fieales of/urwiralbn
ES 7668 LB 8952
Packet Page -510b-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
** *THIS IS NOT A SURVEY * **
THENCE SOUTHERLY 797.44 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
585.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78'06'08" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S.22'20'09 "E. FOR 737.12 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 309.60 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF
345.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51'25'01" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
5.08'59'36 "E, FOR 299.32 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 427.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
685.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35'46'17" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S.16'48'57 "E. FOR 420.75 FEET;
THENCE S.01'04'11 "W., FOR 400.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE S.87'26'21 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 2,025.64 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE S.89'01'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1,328.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE S.01'18'52 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE 5.89'22'00 "W., THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 663.28 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.01'14'38 "E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE 5.89'01'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 664.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
(1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 S.89- 01'58 "W., FOR 627.16 FEET;
THENCE N.01'01'15 "E., FOR 1,699.99 FEET;
THENCE 5.89'01'58 "W., FOR 701.42 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
(1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE S.01'01'15 "W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 68.31 FEET;
THENCE S.89'01'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
(1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,232.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH
HALF (1/2);
THENCE N.00- 51'54 "E., ALONG A LINE LYING 100 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 23 FOR 956.27 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LYING 30 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1,237.00 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE WEST LINE OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.01'01'15 "E., ALONG WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 30.05 FEET TO A POINT
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.87'37'31 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1,337.24 FEET TO THE NORTH
QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23;
THENCE N.00'48'00 "E., ALONG THE NORTH SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 FOR 1341.66;
THENCE S.B7'34'35 "E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF
THE SOUTH WEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1002.75 FEET;
THENCE N.00'48'03 "E., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE WEST HALF (1/2) OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1340.81 FEET;
THENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG THE EAST WEST QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 FOR 668.39 FEET
THENCE N.00'48'11 "E., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE EAST HALF (112) OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 30.05 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE
LYING 30 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF (1/2);
THENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 289.47 FEET;
THENCE N.00'48'11 "E., ALONG A LINE LYING 289 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
EAST HALF (1/2) FOR 200.33 FEET;
THENCE 5.67'31'38 "W., ALONG A LINE LYING 230 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
EAST HALF (1/2) FOR 289.47 FEET;
THENCE N.00'48' 1 1 "E., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF (1 /2) FOR 1 ,1 1 1.00 FEET TO A POINT
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID
SECTION 14;
THENCE 5.87'28'42 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,002.41 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE N.00'48'45 "E., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 335.13 FEET;
THENCE S.87'27'58 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTH (1/2) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,236.32 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A
LINE LYING 100 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.00'49'30 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1,004.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN;
CONTAINING 700.1 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL
PARCEL "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON SHEET 3
k4a,h 20, 2012 1:14 PV 0- \2005 \050150.04.01 Hacienda Lakes = \0003 Lego 01 \0501500401;K01. dwg
INC.
12/14/11
CLIENT:
��ng
DI VA
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
S-
sGLE:
N/A
VLSII2IIiEhOI1
CONSULTING Civil Enpraing
D-
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
i 111� r rt i S,n, Mapping
ete
2W
6610 YASOw Park Ddva, suite 200
"�''"AX:(=5
M . S.J.
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
° "E
(239) 597-0575 FAX: (2391 597-0576
www.mngat- 1wa.mrn
M..
M.A.W.
sees.
1.T3'�cne oer
PROJECT
u1 �.,�F�. 050150.04.01
SHEET
N',IMBER� 2 OF 7
FIL'_
NUMBER: SKO1
Fkmda Gerf9eatas of Auft"i""an
EB 7663 LS 6952
Packet Page -5U /-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
** *THIS IS NOT A SURVEY * **
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL
PARCEL "A"
A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
(1 /4);
THENCE S.87'37'31 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 1,262.41 FEET;
THENCE N.01'34'13 "E., FOR 779.21 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE:
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 111.22 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57'55'46" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS N.30'32'06 "E. FOR 106.54 FEET;
THENCE N.89'12'00 "W., FOR 58.03 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LYING 80 FEET EASTERLY OF AND
PARALLEL TO THE NORTH SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.00'48'00 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1,757.87 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 22.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 15.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86'43'40" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.44'09'49 "E. FOR 20.60 FEET;
THENCE N.02'28'22 "W., FOR 10.00 FEET TO A POINT ALONG A LINE LYING 30 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL
TO THE EAST WEST QUARTER (1/4) LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 632.81 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;
THENCE EASTERLY 192.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF
1,000.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'03'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.81'59'59 "E. FOR 192.65 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE EASTERLY 181.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF
940.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'03'18" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N.81'59'59 "E. FOR 181.09 FEET;
THENCE N.87'31'3B "E., FOR 105.71 FEET;
THENCE S.04'44'35 "E., FOR 0.82 FEET;
THENCE N.89'44'23 "E., FOR 134.31 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF (112) OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID
SECTION 14;
THENCE N.87'31'38 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF (1/2) FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF (1/2);
THENCE 5.00'47'03 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF (1/2) FOR 671.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF (1/2);
THENCE S.87'33'06 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF (1/2) FOR 5.70 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY 1,302.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,530.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29'30'04" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD
WHICH BEARS S.15'32'13 "W. FOR 1,288.33 FEET TO A POINT ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4);
THENCE S.00'47'14 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) FOR 786.85 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN;
CONTAINING 84.9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
V , 1i. - %
MICHAEL A. W.Akil, FROFESS!ONRI.•LAND SURVEYOR LS# 5301 DA
NOT VALID WITHOUT THR'SIGNATURE A1dD THE ORIGINAL RAISED
SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
Mrrch 20, 2G12 is 74 PM G: \2005 \050150.04.01 Hac.tla lakes C00 \0903 Le4ai De.sc•!o!s \P,fV O7 \0.5075000151!0 !. dwg
INC.
°' `'
1z/14/,1
CLIENT:
banning
DIVA
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
scuE
N/A
Visualization
CONSULTING CivilEngincezing
BRA - 8
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
i %�. T TL i surveying & Mam ing
6610 V401w Perk Dfin, suite 200
Na gMFIw tla341D9
M.S.J.
C,�_CKt° y..
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
(2391597 -0575 FAX: (239)597 -0576
www.mnsu t- .mm
M.Q.W.
SEC: r ar,E.
�•��• "•_ "� "ter
I
PROJECT SHEET
����,.��o. 050150.04.01 NUMBER: 3 o; 7
FILE
Nt1MBER: S K 0 1
FIwIOe CehifWes at AUthar¢atim
EB 7663 LB 6952
racKet rage -5uts-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
__
***THIS,
IS NOT A SURVEY * **
BEARING
i-FW _ LINE SECTION 11
1
N87'25'45 "E
100.18'
�I
'V
N87'28'56 "E 1235.95'
S.E. 1/4
S00'49'1 3 "W
342.92'
L4
N87'25'45 "E
100'S.
S w. 1/4
1/4 COR.
R
L19
N87'31'38 "E
1/2 S. 1/2 S.W. 1/4
r0
N00'48' 1 1 "E
200.33'
L21
C11
J
S.W. 1/4 LESS W. 100'
N87'25'45 E
N00'48'45 "E
335.13'
L23
0
11
L1
N. LINE SECTION 14 -- -____. _____
- -- -
1336.32'
14 14
L25
N69'1 2'00 "W
58.03'
L26
- --- S87'25'45'W
10.00'
L27
N87'31'38 "E
632.81'
t,
5
14
POB
1 N.W. 1/4
L20
N. 1/2 N.W. 1/4 N.W.
',, N.W. 1/4
N.E. 1/4
-
O
>
EAST /WEST QUARTER
LINE SECTION 14 289'
�.
P0C 1/4 LESS W. 100'
N E t/a
°
L19
O
°
N.W. CORNER
N.W. 1/4
N87 31'38' E
in
SECTION 14
668.39" L18;
L27
w
o
--
HACIENDA LAKE S
O
- ..._..
N8T27'14 "E
0
- - - - - -- - - - - --
- -_ - -
CDD BOUNDARY
668.22'
-
-c'
_
I
700.1 ACRES
'
� 00
N. 1/2 S. 1/2
SECTION 1LINE
�
Z
N.W. 1/4 N.W. 1/4
LESS W. 100'
0
M
S. 1/2 N.E.
1/4 N.E. 1/4
W
W. 1/2 E. 1/2 j
E. 1/2
cq
- .
N.E. 1/4 NE. 1/4 i
N.E. 1 14
W
Li
L23
J
S.W. i 14
t\
S.E. 1/4
n
LINE SECTION 14
LESS & EXCEPT
- -
i - - - -- -' -- -
�_ W-
i'\-W.
�
w
___._—
-- --------- _--- - - - - -- �
58728'42 "W 1002.41
Cn
N
I
�'
I
j
it
li I
I �
! I
I �
'Il
i
I
i
1/4 COR.
i
s 141
115 141
i1
I,I I
I
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
N87'25'45 "E
100.18'
1-2
N00'50'27 "E
344.07'
L3
S00'49'1 3 "W
342.92'
L4
N87'25'45 "E
668.16'
L18
N00'48'1 1 'E
30.05'
L19
N87'31'38 "E
289.47'
L20
N00'48' 1 1 "E
200.33'
L21
587'31'38 "W
289.47'
L22
N00'48'45 "E
335.13'
L23
S87'27'58 "W
1236.32'
L24
N01'34'1 3 "E
779.21'
L25
N69'1 2'00 "W
58.03'
L26
NO2'28'22 "W
10.00'
L27
N87'31'38 "E
632.81'
o
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
�z
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
C13
111.22'
110.00'
W E
N30'32'06 "E
106.54'
C14
�U
15.00'
86'43'40"
N44'09'49 "E
20.60'
C15
w
-
E. 112 E.
11'03'18"
1/4
192.65'
S'
1/2 S.E.
1/4 N.W.
of
Fbrida EB 76 aces of 6952 anon
EB 7663 L66952
S.W.
N.E. 1/4
1/4
o 250' 500'
GRAPHIC SCALE Z
1'= 500'
N
o
L20
EAST /WEST QUARTER
LINE SECTION 14 289'
L21
CENTER SECTION 14
L19
L2 6
C15_
C16
N87 31'38' E
668.39" L18;
L27
j
O
C14
0
EAST /WEST
80'
SECTION 1LINE
0
M
E, 1/2 ! W. 1/2
E. 1/2
W. 1/2 E. 1/2 j
E. 1/2
cq
W
N.E. 1/4 NE. 1/4 i
N.E. 1 14
N.W. 1/4
Li
S.W. 1/4 S.W. 1/4 1
S.W. i 14
t\
S.E. 1/4
n
LESS & EXCEPT
w
PARCEL A
° 84.9 ACRES
o p
Z m
WEST LINE OF THE E Z
1/2 OF W 112 OF
i NE 1/4 OF E:
SOUTH LINE OF THE 587'34'35 W 1002.75 'D NORTH /SOUTH
NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 10 QUARTER tLIINE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
C13
111.22'
110.00'
57'55'46"
N30'32'06 "E
106.54'
C14
22.71'
15.00'
86'43'40"
N44'09'49 "E
20.60'
C15
192.95'
1000.00'
11'03'18"
N81- 59'59 "E
192.65'
n
SEE SHEETS 1, 2 & 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 7
MC,& 20. 2012 1:74 PM 0 \2005\050;50.04.07 Hp j, Ja Lae C00 \0003 .gi)es opllan\RF✓ 01 \05 11 50040 1SK01,dwq
INC.
DE
11�04�11
CLIENT:
L25
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
SCAiE:
1" = 500'
ViS118Iild, hOI1
CONSULTING QvilEnoxffing
_-1 o,,
o
it T TA 1 S --ymg&
6610 Willow Park Drive, Sidle 200
0
o0
C 13
`�E °�`° a..
o
S.W. 1/4
(239) 597-0575 (239) 597-0576
e.com
www.towes
°
z
S.E. 1/4
CN
�
PROJECT
nii i +enFP� 050150.04.01
J
FILE
NUMBER: SK01
S
SEE SHEETS 1, 2 & 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 7
MC,& 20. 2012 1:74 PM 0 \2005\050;50.04.07 Hp j, Ja Lae C00 \0003 .gi)es opllan\RF✓ 01 \05 11 50040 1SK01,dwq
INC.
DE
11�04�11
CLIENT:
��g
DIVA
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
SCAiE:
1" = 500'
ViS118Iild, hOI1
CONSULTING QvilEnoxffing
_-1 o,,
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
it T TA 1 S --ymg&
6610 Willow Park Drive, Sidle 200
M.S.J.
`�E °�`° a..
FAX:
"-057 FAX:(2"°'
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
(239) 597-0575 (239) 597-0576
e.com
www.towes
M.A.W.
SEC � *wc� acE.
x•1$14 c..c oec
PROJECT
nii i +enFP� 050150.04.01
SaE ET
NUMBER: 4 OF 7
FILE
NUMBER: SK01
of
Fbrida EB 76 aces of 6952 anon
EB 7663 L66952
raCKet rage -5uy-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
** *THIS IS NOT, A SURVEY * **
t4 �3
d SECTION CORNER N
I
fl w E
� � I
I s
E 0 250' Soo'
fl �
GRAPHIC SCALE
s 1'= 50D'
w� v
z � M � iI
�" fl ° In
N87'28'42 "E 1336.55'
_ C„
I 3
WW �o
W HACIENDA LAKES o
Z i CDD BOUNDARY N.W. 1/4
a 700.1 ACRES
U
S.E. 1/4 N.E. 1/4
C2
Hfl
L28
N87'31'38 "E
105.71'
I
504'44'35 "E
0.82'
L30
N89'44'23 "E
fl
L31
II
L
E
8
29 EAST/WEST
QUARTER LINE
L30 SECTION 14
S87'33'06 "W
C16
14113
_ _ _ —_ - -_
L31 - -T r a
13
�1/4
C15 - J
O�
COR.
146.09'
L6 1
181.37'
940.00'
3 0'yo
N81'59'59 "E
11
z v 7 0
1302.67'12530.00'129'30'04"
NE ;z v L7
LO O
j 3 Z Ln Ln
$ L32
k -- - - -- S.W. 1/4
LESS & EXCEPT
PARCEL A
84.9 ACRES
$ I
$ U C4
DO
I - -
i
fl
fl
i
T
S.E. 1/4 S.E. 1/4
L9
1�
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L28
N87'31'38 "E
105.71'
L29
504'44'35 "E
0.82'
L30
N89'44'23 "E
134.31'
L31
N87'31'38 "E
334.19'
L32
S87'33'06 "W
5.70'
L33
S00'47'14 "W
786.85'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
C1
166.87'
9860.00'
0'58'11"
S16'32'15 "W
166.87'
C2
788.77'
1580.00'
28'36'11"
530'21'15 "W
780.60'
C3
146.11'
2390.00'
3'30'10"
542'54'15 "W
146.09'
C16
181.37'
940.00'
11'03'18"
N81'59'59 "E
181.09'
C17
1302.67'12530.00'129'30'04"
Ronde Certieos dAutrartrak.
EB 7663 LB 6952
S15'32'13 "W
1288.33'
1 1) o_
J J
\ si 9
MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEETS 1, 2 & 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
M—h 20. 2012 1:14 PM O: \20. ^.5 \050;50.04.0/ Hoc ;endC
Lakes CUD \000,7
Lego? D- C,ipIinn, \REV 01 \050! r00401SK01.dwg
]AXIA INC.
��g
10
11�04�11
CLIENT:
HACIENDA LAKES OF .NAPLES, LLC
sc UE
1" =._500'
V._._t_ —_._on
CONSULTING CivlPn&=Ting
°FAwti 1Y
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
i T VA. i Swveymg & Mapping
6610 WIIbw Perk Drive, SuIta 200
-0576
M. S.J.
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
CHECKED BY:
M.A.W.
(2391597�T5s 239)57
ww —A�r\a
Ec: — "°E.
1- is•i..cn¢ ?AV
PROJECT 050150.04.01
NUMBER:
SHEET 5 7
NUMBER: Of NUMBER:
"�E SK01
Ronde Certieos dAutrartrak.
EB 7663 LB 6952
Packet Page -510-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
I
Q Cr;
Q °
Q
N.E. 114 N.W.
e L15 1/4 S.E. 1/4
8 � I
LINE TABLE
*THIS
IS NOT
A SURVEY * **
L11
N87'37'31 "E
MATCH'L**
L12
SOO'47'12 "W
120.18'
L13
N87'40'54 "E
255.17'
L14
SO1- 04'11 "W
400.82'
N
389'22'00 "W
SEE
SHEET
5
1480.00'
11'04'44"
S49'45'04 "E
285.73'
C8
267.33'
620.00'
L1 1 LJ ,
•
14
13 - -
-- - - -- -- -- - - -- -
-` -- N. LINE SECTION 24
W E
280.00'
41'52'48"
-- - -
23
24
797.44'
585.00'
78'06'08"
S22'20'09 "E
C
�POB
O I CORNIER
�
cS
L13
S
�
SO8'59'36 "E
299.32'
2
ff
Cs
685.00'
35'46'17"
516'48'57 "E
PARCEL A
N87'37'31 "E
o 250' 500'
S.E CORNER OF S.W.
1303.9
Q
1/4 S.E. 1/4
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
�
LESS & EXCEPT
I
1"= 500'
PARCEL A
�
�p
R
I 84.9 ACRES
Q
Q
�
N.E. 1/4
■
N.E. 1/4
Q
I
HACIENDA LAKES
p
r
CDD BOUNDARY
[- Q
700.1 ACRES
Mr
i
N.W. 1/4
C/JW
i
w�
1
L?
U
I
'Zz'
S.E. 1/4
N.E. 1/4
U
U�
I
i
I
QQ
'
J
1/4
COR. I
- -.-
A
-..A
- - --
S89'01'58 "W
23 24
S8T28'21 "W 2025.64'
Q
1328.51'
23 z4
I
Q Cr;
Q °
Q
N.E. 114 N.W.
e L15 1/4 S.E. 1/4
8 � I
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L11
N87'37'31 "E
280.43'
L12
SOO'47'12 "W
120.18'
L13
N87'40'54 "E
255.17'
L14
SO1- 04'11 "W
400.82'
L15
389'22'00 "W
663.28'
i N.W. 1/4
N.E. 1/4
S.W. 1/4
Q I I
I
11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
C5
380.23'
300.00'
72'37'04"
S56'00'34 "E
355.28'
C6
103.12'
685.00'
8'37'32"
S59'36'1 2 "E
103.03'
C7
286.17'
1480.00'
11'04'44"
S49'45'04 "E
285.73'
C8
267.33'
620.00'
24'42'17"
S31'51'34 "E
265.27'
C9
204.66'
280.00'
41'52'48"
S40'26'49 "E
200.14'
C10
797.44'
585.00'
78'06'08"
S22'20'09 "E
737.12'
l
309.60'
345.00'
51'25'01"
SO8'59'36 "E
299.32'
2
ff
427.67'
685.00'
35'46'17"
516'48'57 "E
420.75'
SEE SHEETS 1, 2 & 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
M-h 20, 2012 1:14 PM 0:A2005V0_50150.04.01 %Clenda Lakes COD \ODC.3 !.C9,1 Desc.iotions \REV 01V05015004015K01.dw9
INC.
pM
"�04�"
CLIENT:
Planning
IMA M
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
SCALE.
1 " = 500'
visualization
CONSULTING Civii Fngineermg
DR-
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
a V Vi i sun eying Mapping
6610 Mew Park Drive, Suite 200
M.S.J.
`H `" °
"- '"°`3"°9
FAX
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
(238) 387-0575 (239) 547 -0578
e.tore
wxiw.malms
M.A.W.-
5[c: *wc: RcE:
'j,'�• C.nc oar
PROJECT
NIIAARFR� 050150.04.01
NU.VB C
NUMBER: 6 OF 7
FILE SK01
NUMBER:
of
FkrciEa ES 7663 of 6952 isauoll
E87663 1B 6952
Packet Page -511-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
** *THIS IS NOT A SURVEY * **
MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 4
—
SECTION CORNER 14 14 1262.41'
N87'37'31 "E 1337.24' _
C710 N -23 ___- ___._-- -- 23 23 S87'37'31 "W 14 4t9w Z p3 L17 NORTH 1/4 COR. "E 1237.00' I SECTION 23 LESS &
EXCEPT PARCEL
CA I A 84.9 ACRES
N. 1/2 N.W. 1/4 N.W.
O Q1 1/4 LESS WEST 100'
Z N.E. 1/4 N.W. 1/4 N.W. 1/4 N.E. 1/4
WEST LINE
SECTION 23 - --
w
5. 1/2 N.W. 1/4 N.W. I HACIENDA LAKES
100' 1/4 LESS w. 100' 701.42' I CDD BOUNDARY
L16 S89'01'58 °W 700.1 ACRES
I � W
589'01'58 "W 1232.97' I
S. 1/2 N.W. 1/4 N W. 1/4 y
L- - - - - - -- - - -- - z
m
ol
1/4 COR.
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
I
L16
501'01'15 "W
68.31'
L17
N01'01'15 "E
30.05'
scnL1,
1" = 500'
it V Vi i Smvging&M2ppirT
n
S. 1/2 N.W.
+/4 LESS W.
S.W.
I
1/4 N.E. 1/4
q
(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578
FAX:
Wsvxrrnnsugaramm
0
100' LESS O.R.
Rorke CarlificMa of Aulhonsa5an
ED 7663 L96952
sEC. *wr: Rcr-
}.�•.�..� "_
i
PROJECT
.��� „ono. 050150.04.01
SHFFi
N':1MBER'. 7 OF 7
'
2192 PG. 2057
Z
LESS O.R. 3241
PG. 3460
1
I
/4 COR.
627.16'
22111
664.25'
"W
N
SB9'01'58 "W
2123
S89'01'58
I!
wa
Ln z�
w E
`w
^
'j
Z
�-
s
0 250' 500'
GRAPHIC
1'= 500'
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L16
501'01'15 "W
68.31'
L17
N01'01'15 "E
30.05'
SEE SHEETS 1, 2 & 3 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
M—h 20, 2012 1 :14 PM 0';2005 \0501.50.0'7.0' Hoc—do 1 -ok- C00 \0003 Legal Des<��p!�w,s \RE'1 O! \050 ?500401 SKU1.dwq
PaCKet Page -511-
onrf
11/04/11
CLIENT:
>�ng
������C
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC
visua1i2ation
CONSULTING CivilEnginxring
scnL1,
1" = 500'
it V Vi i Smvging&M2ppirT
DRAWN R.
TITLE: HACIENDA LAKES
6610 NWillm Pane Dnva, SuQe 26O
Naples,
M.S.J.
ED a..
CDD BOUNDARY EXHIBIT 2
(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578
FAX:
Wsvxrrnnsugaramm
M.A.W.
Rorke CarlificMa of Aulhonsa5an
ED 7663 L96952
sEC. *wr: Rcr-
}.�•.�..� "_
i
PROJECT
.��� „ono. 050150.04.01
SHFFi
N':1MBER'. 7 OF 7
='LE SK01
NUMBER:
PaCKet Page -511-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
EXHIBIT 3
LANDOWNERS' WRITTEN CONSENT
TO ESTABLISHMENT OF
HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
WILTON LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and MARCO
ISLAND GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability company collectively ( "Owner "), by and through
its authorized representative George P. Bauer, hereby certifies that it is the owner of certain property
located in unincorporated Collier County, Florida, more particularly described on Schedule A hereto
(the "Property "). By signing below, the Owner hereby gives its full consent to the establishment by
Collier County, Florida of the HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (the
"District ") in accordance with Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, and to the inclusion of the Property
within the boundaries of the proposed District. The Property comprises 100% of the property to be
included within the boundaries of the proposed District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 13 4 day of
( 2012.
Wilton Land Company, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company
By. George P. P. Bauer, Manager
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this (3�5 day of `%1/6!l -64 ,
2012, by George P. Bauer, as Manager of Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability
company who is personally known to me [ tfor produced
as identification.
Notary Public Si ature: U Ak t M • A1I
Printed Name: Qt�b �e M. L wy-ue
Notary Stamp:
Notary Public State of Florida
>q `' Charlotte M Walkup
Commf EE 158145
Expires 01/21!2016
Packet Page -513-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Marco Island Group, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company
By:
George P. Vauer, Manager
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF COLLIER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this I3 day of !X" , 2012,
by George P. Bauer, as Manage of Marco Island Group, LLC, a Florida limited liability company who
is personally known to me [ or produced as identification.
Notary Public Si nature. UV416a _1)q . Wx
Printed Name: ltG(i9 c rK . W 1
Notary Stamp:
E ary Public State of Florida
flatte M Walkup
ComTtasion EE 158145 res0l/2t/2018
Packet Page -514-
Y.
C.
U
G
tt
INC.
Plannin
DIVA Visuali g zation
CONSULTING Civil Engin=ing
JL %. V VA. JL Surveying & Mapping
6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578
www.consuhrwa.com
Florida Certificates of Authorization
EB 7663 LB 6952
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
CLIEV:
DEC-- 2011
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 200'
1-iqMV1 PY. TITLE:
M.S'J. EXHIBIT 3A PROPOSED
'-; 1) 1131 STORMWATER PLAN SKETCH
A.A.Z.
FT
Exhibit 3A
Packet Page -515-
mi
Ul
INC.
Planning
"DA VA Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
JL %. T V.L JL Surveying & Mapping
6610 Willow Pa* Drive, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578
www.consuft-rwazam
Florida Certificates of Authorization
EB 7663 L8 6952
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
'A
lc
DEC., 201 11 CLIENT:
HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 200'
M,.,S.J. TITLE: EXHIBIT 3B PROPOSED
WASTEWATER PLAN SKETCH
',ki 1 1 1 R Exhibit 3B
Packet Page -516- 50,04,01 N 15 . .
U V-
li
LORDS AY
RATTLitNAKE
1' HANIMOI CK RD
T
kI
J
0,11
INC.
Planning
"DIVA Visualizafion
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
JL %. V V.L JL Surveying & Mapping
6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200
Naples, 34109
(239) 597-D575 Florida FAX: (239) 597-0578
www.consull-rwa.mm
Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952
J
7.
9/11/2012 Item 9. B.
LEGEND:
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
HACIENDA LAKES
PROPOSED
WATER MAIN
Z
GEC= _2G -' _ 1 .."I -- -
1 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 200
)�Wf' TIT
M'. S. J. LE: EXHIBIT 3C PROPOSED
WATER PLAN SKETCH
J.A.Z.
150. C 4. 01
v 1 12Ef�
—Packet Page -517- 1 1 . M�. [xhlbit 3C
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
RADIO RD
Legend
COLLIER COUNTY ROADS
® HACIENDA LAKES CDD BOUNDARY
S..............
...
HACIENDA LAKES DRUMPUD `''
HACIENDA ,I
COLLIER COUNTY PUD'S
-
, I PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST "
NAPLES HERITAGE
AGRICULTURAL OR OTHER ZONING
SAN MARINO
�•'
NAPLES N L
AT'
.._..... :.
r _w r
.. , .. — .. ,.
GOLF CL
s
s t
t Jt
a^
,..._._-
HOMES OF
.,4 •
/r
ISLANDIA
-.
r1M.. C ,'If 'X .iM t ,)r }r 4.`,1^ ztir, �s� ,1
X
r I.
,...�, ..,....
LASIP
..........._CONSERVATION
x, r
". nI
,, ,,:,i t !,� 'Y '...i. r .sl.. ,.Xr:
x, t
^ .,ii ` : ,..rC,•._
.
NAPLES LAKES i
FIRSTASSY-
tt.
Jl,i xis )rl, rt.; .rt^ �sl� .t4 ..•5xi� .'•1
COUNTRY CLUB
MINST EDU
-1
GOOD TUR
EREHAB.
CENTER P
I
HAMMOCK PARK
COMMERCE
f •
-
'
CENTER
MCMULL i
-� . -�
f , . „rXr
•x
SIERRA
MEADOWSiEX:
EDI SON
VILLAGE
"”' ~. • s i, : -J,
COLLIER
(: i 4 M Yf
REGIONAL
ROCKEUGE
"'C' . i .xt I.is tiYXr�,
MEDICAL CE!JTER
SABAL PALM RD,','
.ter ,,.." .,..,•.�� ,,:
LELY RESORT !�
rV.
WINDING CYPRESS
6RI
`
- .,te�.I .t � Yf .q'4) � t^ ' _iA t _s:,. . ir. ; itn' .I 1t ^- •,i.`
" .'rE. -p,i.- t -.'•tY ,,t.,..[^ 4 , -tY N 4 f. It ■ .mot. ...
r
tG -c~� F1.' Wr{ ,4lrli t. .iks x.Y{fi
Exhibit 4 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet
Existing Land Use
Packet Page -518-
CONSULTING
.i 1%, r u z
N • Planning Visualization
Civil Engincering •Sur eying K Mapping
A, AGRICULTURE
I I I UNDEVELOPED
I I
A, AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION
WILLOW RUN QUARRY
- - - - - --
I (
I I j 1
I
FIRST ASSEMBLY
MINISTRIEy PUD
I
I 1
-
- LORDSNIIAY - - -
__
~1
I ui
I Iv I
_ - t I
AGRICULTUR
W I j J l UNDEVELOPED
:3 o^ I X
I 12 I I
t +�- - - - - -- I F=1
_ ____I NI A, AGRICULTURE
GOOD TURN 11 UNDEVELOPED
CENTER MPUD I I
I I------- - -1 -1- -- J - -- --
17 McMULLEN MPUD
! HAMMOCK PARK II (PROPOSED)
`I COMMERCE I II UNDEVELOPED
CENTER CPUD I II
y--- .---- --._I'
.v I
� I
0
0
O j I
o I {I{
h
I I I COLLIER REGIONAL
o MEDICAL CENTER PUD
o I i
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
I I
LEGEND-
- - — - — HACIENDA LAKES CDD
Im (PRIVATE LANDS)
A, AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION
WILLOW RIN QUARRY
M�
L ��
� X_
HACIENDA LAKES < w
DRI /MPUD Z _z
o I�
rn J N
w
a it
Mlo=
i
o �
o I ----- - ---T-1
I I
� I '
d I I I I
to I --- (- - - - -- \
1- - - - - -I i A, AGRICULTURE
I I ;' SINGLE- FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
N I I I I NURSERY USES
r RPUD ROCKEDGE
IN
]AITA o
Z CONSULTING . sirny M%4)ing
6610 W IIDW Park Drive, State 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597-M
www.aonsult- rwazom
Florida Certificates of Auftft tim
EB 7663 LB 5952
HACIENDA LAKES
DR]/MPUD
A. AGRICULTURE
UNDEVELOPED
A, AGRICULTURE
UNDEVELOPED
HACIENDA LAKES
DRI /MPUD
< x c
A, AGRICULTURE
SINGLE- FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
NURSERY USES
ATE: CLIENT:
DEC., 2011
KALE: 0' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, L.L.C. 1 " = 1200'
DRAWN BY: TITLE: EXHIBIT 5
M.S.J.
CHECKED BY: LAND USE MAP
J.A.Z.
SEC: 150.04.01 SHEET 1 1 FILE Exhibit 5
�u10 Packet Page -519- NuMeER: of NUMBER:
i A. AGRICULTURE
UNDEVELOPED A, AGRICULTURE
I I COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION
WILLOW RUN QUARRY
M
s
v
cc
I
w I i
° - -- I
—t
I
z I I - - — I
o
i I I FIRST ASSEMBLY
g � � MINISTRIES PUD
* --
Y I i
II
a �J
u I
v I
0
i 1 ! COWER REGIONAL
° I MEDICAL CENTER PUD
0 1 I
0
y ! I I I
h
N
y
n �
N J
II RPUD ROCKEDGE
Plannin
DIATA jNr_
CONSULTING 6v1 FLg
Z t v TA 1 Slmeyb g& Mapping
6610 Willow Park DrW9, Suits 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239)597-0575 FAX:(239)597 -0576
www.consuk- rwacan
Florba Certificates of AudwrizeUon
EB 7663 LB 6952
HACIENDA 't:4KES
DRI /MPUD
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
LEGEND:
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
A. AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION
WALLOW RIN QUARRY
I
I I
E
o: W I
W
I I
o
i
i LORDS' AY
W j
W
�
�
I �
-1
Q W
F'Z F-
Irl
a
a----- -- -Tfl
y
m i
Iv 1411
—I
A.
- - - -- -- T
UNDEVELOPEDE
I
b
j
-- --- --. i OI
I
I _
1 1
a
O
----- - - - �
iFl
= I —I A, AGRICULTURE
1411 UNDEVELOPED
TURN I I
CENTER MPUD —_ --
I
I McMULLEN
HAMMOCK PARK
g
I
COMMERCE II UNDEVELOPED
o
I
CENTER CPUD II
* --
Y I i
II
a �J
u I
v I
0
i 1 ! COWER REGIONAL
° I MEDICAL CENTER PUD
0 1 I
0
y ! I I I
h
N
y
n �
N J
II RPUD ROCKEDGE
Plannin
DIATA jNr_
CONSULTING 6v1 FLg
Z t v TA 1 Slmeyb g& Mapping
6610 Willow Park DrW9, Suits 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239)597-0575 FAX:(239)597 -0576
www.consuk- rwacan
Florba Certificates of AudwrizeUon
EB 7663 LB 6952
HACIENDA 't:4KES
DRI /MPUD
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
LEGEND:
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
A. AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION
WALLOW RIN QUARRY
A, AGRICULTURE
SINGLE— FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
NURSERY USES I
I
HACIENDA LAKES
DRI /MPUD
A. AGRICULTURE
SINGLE— FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
NURSERY USES
'47E CLIENT:
DEC., 2011 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 " = 1200'
)R" M S.J. �`� EXHIBIT 6
"ECKM BY;
J.A.Z. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
s +cte T ' - -- •- -- jO.O4.0 SHEET 1 FILE
-is.�o 5 Exhibit 6
Packet Page -SZO- NUMBER: OF NUMBER:
HACIENDA LAKES
Fr
DRI /MPUD
o: W I
W
A. AGRICULTURE
in
UNDEVELOPED
W j
W
�
�
I �
-1
Q W
F'Z F-
L
I�
rn en
!Ia o
A.
Q'�
UNDEVELOPEDE
m
I
D
I
A, AGRICULTURE
SINGLE— FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
NURSERY USES I
I
HACIENDA LAKES
DRI /MPUD
A. AGRICULTURE
SINGLE— FAMILY
HOMES AND PRIVATE
NURSERY USES
'47E CLIENT:
DEC., 2011 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 " = 1200'
)R" M S.J. �`� EXHIBIT 6
"ECKM BY;
J.A.Z. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
s +cte T ' - -- •- -- jO.O4.0 SHEET 1 FILE
-is.�o 5 Exhibit 6
Packet Page -SZO- NUMBER: OF NUMBER:
I
EXISTING GAS LINE�I
EXISTING 36' \
a WATER MAIN
v \ �
EXISTING 12'
FORCE MAIN -
I;
o!
Q '
W I;
OIL
W,
I: I I
EXISTING GAS LINES I;
I;
EXISTING 24"
WATER MAIN --
RATTLESNAKE
HAMMOCK _
`EXISTING 12*
o WATER MAIN
J
v° SIERRA MEADOWS
c
d
EXISTING 36'
WATER MAIN
0
ED NN
VILLAGE
0 L---It
0
i
0
N li
o LELY RESORT g
a I�
N EXISTING 36' I`
w WATER MAIN IC ;I
G
N i
EXISTING 6'
FORCE MAIN 0 I I
u IQ i I
1[x
I
I I
I I
I I
1l,, I
FIRST nNs-PMBLY
MINISTRIES PUD
R� WAY _
II I I
I I
I � I
14
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
_ t
GOOD TURN
CENTER MPUD I _
I
HAMMOCK PARK j I
COMMERCE I I MCMULLEN MPUD
CENTER CPUD I I
RATTLESNAKES HAMMOCK EXT.
COWER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER PUD
IN .
i%.VVi i Smvyiwg
6610 Willow Park Dr!", Sub 200
Naples, Florida 34109
(239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578
www.consull- rwa-com
Florida Certificates of Audwdzabon
EB 7663 LB 6952
RPUD ROCKEDGE
r
fU,
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
LEGEND: -
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
DEC., 2011 -- HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC.
1 " = 1200'
)RAM Y: TITLE: EXHIBIT 7
;NECKED BY: EXISTING UTILITY PLAN
J.A.Z.
SEC: 50.04.01 SHED 1 1 FILE Exhibit 7
..
Packet Page -521- NUMBER: OF NUMBER:
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Exhibit 8
Estimated Costs of District Improvements
INC
T).'X"XTA Visualilzgation
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
-AL Rio. T V.A. JL Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE A -1
RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD EXT. & BRIDGE
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
IaZ�
ROADWAY
$1,296,398.50
$2,842,588.50
TOTAL $4,138,987.00
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $4,552,885.70
See each specific Section for Notes and assumptions related to that Section of Work.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -522 -
QA2003%030130.02.03 H-.dl Lk. MPMDRI•FR %W12 C—r ..I Suc Pi..ing\Subwk 2.2 Snr PI—ing - R- dm11h0PC'1W.0 -d. lakes CDD - Phw A -I..1,
rover Pace 1 of 7 12/15/2011
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
7D'X"X
T
A INC.
Planning
Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
AL %a. T TA. M. Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PRASE A -2
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL
EARTHWORK
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER & FIRE
STORM DRAINAGE
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
LIGHTING
$160,262.50
$909,375.00
$427,542.00
$214,392.00
$693,806.00
$1,590,717.45
$43,671.00
$40,000.00
TOTAL $4,079,765.95
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $4,487,742.55
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -523 -
Qa200500150.02.03 H—d. Lk. MPUD- DRI.ER?"2 C.n penal Sue PlanningAuduk 2.2 S.1, Planning. RCEidw..1\0PCWHa a da LA. CDD • PI—A-2.., 1 2/1 51201 1
Suminery 1 OM 1:54 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
INC.
TA Visuiza
. al
tion
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
t E T L -1L Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE B -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL
EARTHWORK
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER & FIRE
STORM DRAINAGE
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
LIGHTING
$135,912.50
$1,214,690.00
$804,646.00
$331,678.00
$600,048.00
$1,049,727.70
$28,410.00
$20,000.00
TOTAL $4,185,112.20
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $4,603,623.42
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -524 -
Q. 12005%050150.02.03 H.6-6 Wee MPUD-DRI -ERP KW2 C -Ill —1 SM PI.—r\Sut.,k 2.2 S,., P1 ,.g • LA. CDD - Ph.. B -1.0 12115/2011
G�mmary ] ON] 1:36 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9. B.
INC.
Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
AL `fr,., F P.A_ JL Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE B -2
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $268,875.00
EARTHWORK $2,146,833.50
SANITARY SEWER $650,040.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $443,850.00
STORM DRAINAGE $669,144.00
PAVING $1,256,517.40
LANDSCAPING $49,173.00
LIGHTING $20,000.00
TOTAL $5,504,432.90
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $6,054,876.19
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -525 -
Q:12005`W150.02.03 H. d. Lk. MPUD DBI -EPj vw2 C.Vg .l Si,. Plmnmg\SW*.k 2.2 Sn Pl.n g - R-1d.1n.h0P0'JU imd. Lka COD - Ph. B -1a4 12115 /2011
qo MAM I of 11 1:56 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
INC
1>111A Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
A. VIL T c.L XL Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE C -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $133,687.50
EARTHWORK $1,583,975.00
SANITARY SEWER $456,914.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $303,860.00
STORM DRAINAGE $415,544.00
PAVING $1,579,806.70
LANDSCAPING $55,992.00
LIGHTING $20,000.00
TOTAL $4,549,779.20
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $5,004,757.12
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -526 -
QA]005 N11SOA2.0) H me d. UkC MPUD- DRI- EMXXJ2 Conuyluil 2.2 5oc Pl.0 g- RtsdW1 1X0PC',\H..oM. Laka CDD. Ph-, C -lah 12/15/2011
Qvm 1 of 11 1:57 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
INC.
"DIX /A Planning
Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
.AL iii,. T F A. JL Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE C -2
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $99,812.50
EARTHWORK $1,216,358.00
SANITARY SEWER $764,398.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $445,790.00
STORM DRAINAGE $366,560.00
PAVING $710,298.90
LANDSCAPING $47,151.50
LIGHTING $20,000.00
TOTAL $3,670,368.90
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $4,037,405.79
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -527 -
Q:12005\050150.02.03 Haci -1, ]aka MPUD- DRI -ERPOW CMIPTuA1 Sac hmang�SubmA 2.2 Sac Plaaring • R— dwu&1\0PC's\K —d. lakes CDD • Phase C -2. 1, 12 /1$1201 1
Summary 1 of 11 1:58 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
-Jr I
DIX / ' Visualiliation
CONSULTING t/' Civil Engineering
�. E T.L X. Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE D -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL
EARTHWORK
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER & FIRE
STORM DRAINAGE
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
LIGHTING
$129,180.00
$565,577.00
$452,830.00
$217,965.00
- $338,780.00
$1,328,832.10
$20,165.00
$12,000.00
TOTAL $3,065,329.10
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $3,3717862.01
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -528 -
Q:V(N.S U5U150.02.03 Nx mda Lake. MPUD- DRI -ERF4M C—qm -1 Si c Planniag\SuMask 2.2 Sile Flaming - P—ide -10PCVH -.da Lakes CDD - Fbase D. L.), 12/15/2011
Summary 1 of 12 1:59 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
TA INC.
"DAI Planning
Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
.AL 1n, T T L J. Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE E -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $164,925.00
EARTHWORK $1,297,118.50
SANITARY SEWER $416,859.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $419,725.00
STORM DRAINAGE $442,000.00
PAVING $862,519.40
LANDSCAPING $29,468.50
LIGHTING $15,000.00
TOTAL $3,647,615.40
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $43012,376.94
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -529 -
Q:1H10511150150.02.03 H...d. LA. MPW- DRI- ERMX)2 C-cm-1 5- PI -1.9Z trek 2.2 S- PI-14 - RaMmu.MPC'sWacimW LA- CDD - Ph— E-1.0, 12/15/2011
1 of 11 2:00 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
iNC•Vis Planning
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
.A- % . T T.L l.. Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE E -2
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $167,625.00
EARTHWORK $1,525,080.50
SANITARY SEWER $726,218.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $273,105.00
STORM DRAINAGE $630,230.00
PAVING $957,587.60
LANDSCAPING $34,800.00
LIGHTING $20,000.00
TOTAL $4,334,646.10
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $41768,110.71
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -530 -
Q:s20051050150A2.03 H-4. l.aka MFMDPJ.EAPVM2 C—q—1 Sn, Plane- g\S.ftd 2.2 gns Plat -ing - P— d— hOPCAN end, Lilo. CDD • Phase E -2.x11 12/15/201'1
Summary._ 1 Of 11 2:01 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
"DIX INC. Planning
TA Visualization
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
JL '%- F i � $ Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE F -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
GENERAL
EARTHWORK
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER & FIRE
STORM DRAINAGE
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
LIGHTING
SUMMARY
$93,285.00
$509,570.00
$92,258.00
$146,532.00
$197,805.00
$216,503.80
$22,304.00
$15,000.00
TOTAL $1,293,257.80
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL)
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
$1,422,583.58
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -531 -
Q:t2UUSW50150 .02.03 Hatamda Lke MPUD- DRI�ERWI007 Conrgnual site Ptanning\SuMakk 11 Site Ptanomg . Waidrnua710/'CaViac1mM Lakes CDD . Phase F -t -dh
12n5no11
1 of 1 o 2:03 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
INC.
I T Visualitzation
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
A- %,.. T T L J . Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE G -1
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $35,050.00
EARTHWORK $158,089.75
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER & FIRE
STORM DRAINAGE
PAVING
LANDSCAPING
LIGHTING
$0.00
$0.00
$145,012.00
$378,525.60
$19,548.50
$12,000.00
TOTAL $748,225.85
TOTAL WITH CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $823,048.44
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section.
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -532 -
QA200%150150.02.03 HmaxW Iska MPUD- D1I•ERYs0IX12 C—pt.1 Sne Plmn.ng\WuA 2.2 Site rimn g - R-6. 1,. WrC'sWa —d. Lek. CDD -ruse G I.0 12/15/2011
I of 7 1:35 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
-DIX, TA INC.v'annlization
Pling
CONSULTING Civil Engineering
AL t T T.L. JL Surveying & Mapping
HACIENDA LAKES CDD
PHASE G -2
PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SUMMARY
GENERAL $39,370.00
EARTHWORK $301,620.00
SANITARY SEWER $0.00
POTABLE WATER & FIRE $0.00
STORM DRAINAGE $284,572.00
PAVING $378,525.60
LANDSCAPING $16,932.00
LIGHTING $12,000.00
TOTAL $1,033,019.60
CONTINGENCY (110% of TOTAL) $1,136,321.56
Assumptions and Notes, if any, are on the pages of each section,
Disclaimer:
This document represents our opinion of the probable cost of the construction based on the
referenced documents and nationally published construction cost guidelines and available
information on local market conditions. This estimate can provide guidance for your decision -
making, however it is not intended to be a guarantee of the actual cost of a project. Frequent
fluctuations in labor and building material costs, as well as the local bid climate, can substantially
alter the construction cost of an individual project. The final determination of building cost is
made through the bidding process with a contractor.
Packet Page -533 -
Q120050150150.02.07 H-6, Lk. MPUD- DRI- ERPM12 Caoc F-1 Siic PluminglSuhask 2.2 Snc Pluming - P-vd -10PC{Waci -da Wa CDD�Pkue C -2x1+ 1211512011
summary 1 OV 1:45 PM
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Exhibit 9
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
Development Phasing
The Project will be developed in one overall phase, broken into two stages as shown below:
Stage Two
Year
Residential
Single - Family Multi - Family
Retail
Stage One
Business Park
School
Year
Residential
Single- Family
Multi - Family
Retail
Office
Business Park School
2012
50 Units
20 Units
30 Units
27,500 SF
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
2013
200 Units
100 Units
100 Units
150,000 SF
20,000 SF
0.0 SF
2014
200 Units
100 Units
100 Units
150,000 SF*
25,000 SF
40,000 SF
2015
250 Units **
100 Units
150 Units
0.0 SF
25,000 SF
0.0 SF
2016
250 Units
100 Units
150 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
284 Units
950 Units
420 Units
530 Units
327,500 SF
70,000 SF
40,000 SF
Stage Two
Year
Residential
Single - Family Multi - Family
Retail
Office
Business Park
School
2015
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
919 Students
2016
25 Units
0 Units
25 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2017
275 Units
100 Units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2018
275 Units
100 Units
175 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
2019
210 Units
84 Units
126 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
20,000 SF
810 Units
284 Units
526 Units
0.0 SF
0.0 SF
100,000 SF
919 Students
Totals:
1760 Units
704 Units
1056 Units
327,500 SF
70,000 SF
140,000 SF
919 Students
* The 135 room hotel is proposed to be developed in Stage One, in 2014.
** The optional 290 unit RV Park may be developed in Stage One, in 2015
Packet Page -534-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Exhibit 10
Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
For
Establishment of the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
Prepared by
District Manager
DPFG, Inc.
15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 175
Tampa, Florida 33647
813 - 374 -9104
www.dpfg.com
Page 1 of 9
Packet Page -535-
Table of Content
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
B. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
Page 3
3
C. HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 4
D. STATUTORY ELEMENTS 5
E. CONCLUSION 8
Page 2 of 9
Packet Page -536-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Petitioner, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, seeks to establish a community development district to
be known as Hacienda Lakes Community Development District (the "District "). This Statement of
Estimated Regulatory Costs (the "SERC') is as a component of the petition filed with the Board of
Supervisors of the Collier County, Florida (the "County "), to establish the District in accordance with
Chapter 190.005, Florida Statutes ( "F.S. "), and designating the land area for which the District would
manage and finance the delivery of basic services.
With respect to this establishment, this document determines that there are no adverse impacts on
State and local revenues, and on small businesses, and there are no additional administrative costs and
transactional costs associated with the annexation. Any one -time transactional or administrative
expenses associated with this action will be covered by one -time fees paid by the petitioner.
The establishment of the District will not create any significant economic costs overall for the State of
Florida or for the County. The proposed action of the District may facilitate private development and
may result in positive fiscal impacts in the long run.
B. PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This SERC has been prepared as a component of the petition filed with the County to establish the
boundaries of the District in accordance with Chapter 190.005, Florida Statutes ( "FS ") and to provide for
the best alternative to deliver community development services and facilities to the proposed
community.
Specifically, FS Section 190.005(1) (a) 8 requires, as part of the petition, a SERC being prepared pursuant
to FS Section 120.541. A community development district ( "CDD ") is established under the Uniform
Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes, as amended (the
"Act "). A CDD is a local unit of special - purpose government that is limited to the performance of those
specialized functions authorized by the Act. Those specialized functions consist of the planning,
financing, constructing and maintaining of certain public infrastructure improvements and community
development services. As an independent special district, the CDD's governing body establishes its own
budget and, within the scope of its authorized powers, operates independently of the local general -
purpose governmental entity (i.e., the county or the city) whose boundaries include the CDD.
A CDD cannot regulate land use or issue development orders. Those powers reside with the local
general - purpose government. According to FS Section 190.004(3), "The establishment of an
independent community development district as provided in this act is not a development order within
the meaning of chapter 380. All governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws,
regulations, and rules apply to all development of the land within a community development district.
Community development districts do not have the power of a local government to adopt a
comprehensive plan, building code, or land development code, as those terms are defined in the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Local Development Regulation Act. A district shall take no
action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, rules, or regulations of the applicable
local general - purpose government."
In addition, the parameters for the review and evaluation of CDD petitions are set forth in FS Section
190.002(2) (d), as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general
Page 3 of 9
Packet Page -537-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
law be fair and based only on factors material to managing and financing the service - delivery function of
the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or
relevant."
Therefore, the scope of this SERC is limited to an evaluation of those factors pertinent to the
establishment of a CDD as defined by the Legislature and outlined in FS Section 120.541(2).
The purpose of FS Chapter 190 is to provide another tool to government and private landowners in their
efforts to comply with comprehensive plans which require adequate public facilities and services as a
pre- condition for future development. See FS Section 163.3177(10) (h) (the "concurrency" requirement).
The CDD is a special purpose unit of local government that is established for the purpose of providing an
alternative mechanism for financing the construction of public infrastructure. A CDD must be structured
to be financially independent as intended by the Legislature. The cost of any additional public
improvements to be constructed or any additional services to be provided by the county as a result of
this development will be incurred whether the infrastructure is financed through a CDD or any other
alternative financing method. These costs have already been evaluated by all appropriate agencies
during the approval process for the development. The annual operations and administrative costs of the
CDD will be borne entirely by the District and will not require any subsidy from the State of Florida or
the County, nor will it place any additional economic burden on those persons not residing within the
District.
C. PROPOSED HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The petitioner is seeking authority, as outlined in FS Section 190.012, to establish the District in order to
finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and
maintain systems, facilities and basic infrastructure that may include, but are not limited to: water
management and control, water supply, sewer, wastewater management, bridges or culverts, District
roads and street lights, transportation facilities, parking improvements, environmental remediation and
cleanup, conservation areas, parks and recreational facilities, fire prevention and control, schools,
security, mosquito control, waste collection and disposal, or any other project, with or without the
boundaries of the District, as required by Development Order 2011 -05, approved 10/25/11, issued by
the County or subject of an agreement between the District and a governmental entity.
If approved, the District will be authorized to finance these types of infrastructure improvements
through special or non -ad valorem assessment revenue bonds. Repayment of these bonds will be
through special or non -ad valorem assessments levied against all benefited properties within the
District. On -going operation and maintenance for District owned facilities is expected to be funded
through maintenance assessments levied against all benefited properties within the District. Refer to
Exhibit A for an overview of proposed facilities and services.
Page 4of9
Packet Page -538-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
D. STATUTORY ELEMENTS:
FS Section 120.541(2) defines that the SERC must contain the following:
1. A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply
with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be
affected by the ordinance;
2. A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government
entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on
state and local revenues;
3. A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and
entities, including local government entities, required to comply with the requirements of the
ordinance;
4. An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S. and an
analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.;
S. Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
The estimated regulatory impacts of the expansion of the boundaries of the District are summarized
below.
1. A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES LIKELY TO BE REQUIRED
TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDINANCE, TOGETHER WITH A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TYPES OF
INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE ORDINANCE
Establishment of the District would put all of the various land uses, including single and multi - family,
retail, and office uses, under the jurisdiction of the District. It is not anticipated that anyone outside of
the District will be affected by the ordinance creating the District, although the State of Florida and the
County will likely be nominally but not adversely affected by the ordinance.. The individuals and entities
likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, or affected by the proposed adoption of the
annexation ordinance are:
a) THE STATE OF FLORIDA - The State of Florida and its residents and general population will not
incur any compliance costs related to the expansion of the District boundaries and on -going
administration of the District. They will only be affected to the extent that the State incurs those
nominal administrative costs outlined in Section 2.b below. The cost of any additional
administrative services provided by the state as a result of this development will be incurred
regardless whether the infrastructure is financed through a CDD or any other financing
alternative.
b) COUNTY AND ITS RESIDENTS - The County and its residents not residing within the boundaries of
the District will not incur any compliance costs, or ongoing administrative costs related to the
establishment, other than any one -time administrative costs outlined in Section 2.a below. The
cost of any additional administrative services provided by the County as a result of this
development will be incurred whether the infrastructure is financed through a CDD or any other
financing alternative.
c) CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS - The current property owners of the lands subject to the
establishment will be affected to the extent that the District allocates assessments and bonded
indebtedness for the construction of infrastructure and undertakes operation and maintenance
Page 5 of 9
Packet Page -539-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
responsibility for that infrastructure. Any allocation of assessments and bonded indebtedness
will be based on special benefit and would require consent from the owners of land subject to
the establishment. Petitioner anticipates providing full landowner consent to be included as an
exhibit to the petition to establish the district.
d) FUTURE PROPERTY OWNERS — The District is a form of governance which allows landowners,
through landowner voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to
determine the type, quality and expense of the District services they receive, provided they
meet the County's overall requirements. Any allocation of assessments and bonded
indebtedness will be based on special benefit and would require consent from the owners of
land subject to the District operations.
a) 2. A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE COST TO THE AGENCY, AND TO ANY OTHER STATE AND
LOCAL ENTITIES, OF IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, AND ANY
ANTICIPATED EFFECT ON STATE AND LOCAL REVENUES COUNTY - The County will not incur any
quantifiable on -going costs resulting from the on -going administration of the District. As
previously stated, the District operates independently from the County and all administrative
and operating costs incurred by the District relating to the financing and construction of
infrastructure are borne entirely by the District. The District will submit, for informational
purposes, its annual budget, financial report, audit and public financing disclosures to the
County. Since there are no legislative requirements for review or action, the County should not
incur any costs. The County may, however, choose to review these documents. To offset these
one time administrative costs, the petitioner will submit a petition filing fee of $15,000 to the
County.
b) STATE - The State of Florida will incur only nominal administrative costs as a result of the
establishment to review the periodic reports required pursuant to FS Chapters 190 and 189..
These reports include the annual financial report, annual audit and public financing disclosures.
To offset these costs, the Legislature has established a maximum fee of $17S per District per
year to pay the costs incurred by the Special Districts Information Program to administer the
reporting requirements of FS Chapter 189. Because the District, as defined in FS Chapter 190, is
designed to function as a self- sufficient special - purpose governmental entity, it is responsible for
its own management and operations. Therefore, except for the reporting requirements outlined
above, or later established by law, no additional burden is placed on the State once the District
has been established.
c) DISTRICT - The District will incur costs for operations and maintenance of its facilities and for its
administration. These costs will be completely paid for from annual assessments against all
properties within the District benefiting from its facilities and its services.
d) IMPACT ON STATE AND LOCAL REVENUES - It is anticipated that approval of this petition will
not have any negative effect on state and local revenues. There is potential for an increase in
state sales tax revenue resulting from the establishment and subsequent development of the
subject land. It is not possible to estimate this increase with unconditional certainty. In addition,
local ad valorem tax revenues may be increased due to long- lasting increases in property values
resulting from the District's construction of infrastructure and on -going maintenance services.
Page 6 of 9
Packet Page -540-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
Similarly, private development within the District, which will be facilitated by the District's
activities, should have a positive impact on property values and therefore ad valorem taxes. In
addition, impact fee and development permit revenue is expected to be generated by private
development within the District and, accordingly, should also increase local revenues.
Concerns that a District obligation could become a state, city or county obligation thereby
negatively effecting state or local revenues cannot occur as Chapter 190 specifically addresses
this issue as follows: "It is further the purpose and intent of the Legislature that no debt or
obligation of a district will constitute a burden on any local general - purpose government without
its consent." [FS Section 190.002(3)] Further, "A default on the bonds or obligations of a district
shall not constitute a debt or obligation of a local general - purpose government or the state. " [FS
Section 190.016(15)]
In summary, the granting of an ordinance the district will not create any significant economic costs for
the State of Florida or for the County. It provides potential revenue generation opportunities for local
general government. The District is fiscally neutral for the State and the County.
3. A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE TRANSACTIONAL COSTS LIKELY TO BE INCURRED BY INDIVIDUALS
AND ENTITIES, INCLUDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES, REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE
The transactional costs associated with adoption of an ordinance to establish the District are primarily
related to the financing of infrastructure improvements. The District will determine what infrastructure
it considers prudent to finance through the sale of bonds. Once the decision is made to issue bonds it is
expected that assessments will be levied against benefited property owners within the proposed
District. The revenue generated by payment of these assessments will be used to repay the bonds. The
obligation to pay the assessments will "run with the land" and will be transferred to new property
owners upon sale of any portions of the property.
To fund the cost of maintaining infrastructure that the District maintains, operation and maintenance
assessments may be imposed on the District property owners. The property owner will be responsible
for payment of these assessments on the basis of the amount of benefited property owned.
All persons choosing to acquire property in the District will be responsible for such assessments in
addition to the taxes or assessments imposed by City and other taxing authorities.
in exchange for the payment of these special assessments, there are potential benefits to be derived by
the future property owners. Specifically, these persons can expect to receive a higher level of services
because they will elect the members of the Districts' Board of Supervisors. Further, the District is limited
in jurisdiction and responsibility to this single development. Therefore, the District should be extremely
responsive to the needs of the property owners within the District.
The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the District to provide
infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental costs above what the landowners
would have paid to install infrastructure via an alternative financing mechanism. Given the low cost of
capital for a District as compared with viable alternatives, the cost impact to landowners is relatively
small. This incremental cost of the high quality infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly
low.
Page 7 of 9
Packet Page -541-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
4. AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT ON SMALL BUSINESSES AS DEFINED BY FS SECTION 288.703, AND AN
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT ON SMALL COUNTIES AND SMALL CITIES AS DEFINED BY FS SECTION 120.52.
The establishment of the District should not have any negative impact on small businesses. Current land
use plans provide for residential and non - residential development. The District must operate according
to Florida's Sunshine law and must follow certain competitive bidding requirements for certain goods
and services it will purchase. As a result, small businesses should be better able to compete for District
business serving the lands to be included within the District. A District does not discriminate in terms of
the size of businesses that can be located within the boundaries or transact business with the District.
Collier County has an estimated population that is greater than 75,000; therefore the county is not
defined as a small county according to Section 120.52(17), Florida Statute.
5. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT THE AGENCY DETERMINES MAY BE USEFUL
Certain data utilized in this report was provided by the developer /petitioner and represents the best
information available at this time. Other data was provided by the District Manager and was based on
observations, analysis and experience with private development and other CDD communities in various
stages of existence.
E. CONCLUSION
For the above stated reasons, the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development District will be a
beneficial land development in Collier County and it will not have any material negative impacts to the
state or county. This SERC Report provides supporting justification for granting the petition to establish
this Community Development District.
\ \192.168.135.58 \data files \hacienda lakes \serc \serc v1 2- 26- 12.doac
Page 8 of 9
Packet Page -542-
9/11/2012 Item 9. B.
Hacienda Lakes CDD
SERC Report
Exhibit A
Proposed Facilities and Services
Facility:
Construction Funded By:
Ownership:
Operation and Maintenance:
Stormwater
Management
CDD
CDD
CDD
Water
Distribution
CDD
Collier County
Collier County
Wastewater
Collection
CDD
Collier County
Collier County
Rights -of -Way
CDD
Collier County
Collier County
Security
CDD
CDD
CDD
Open Space
Improvements
CDD
CDD
CDD
0
Page 9 of 9
Packet Page -543-
Lk
This Warranty Deed Prepared
WITHOUT OPINION OF TITLE BY
Harold J. Webre, a Esquire
GOODI TTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
WARRANTY DEED
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
3702561 OR: 3895 PG: 0868
RICORDID in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLUIR COUNTY, FL
09/21/2005 at 02;35?K DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLIRK
CONS 107700000.00
RBC FIB 137.50
DOC -.70 753900.00
Rett:
GOODLITTI COLIKAN IT AL
4001 TANIAKI TR K 1300
NAPLBS FL 34103
THIS WARRANTY DEED, is s of September, 2005, between VISION
& FAITH, INC., a Florida co OLL- RATTLESNAKE, LLC, a
Florida limited liability com ee, whose post c ess is 28341 S. Tamiami Trail,
Suite 4, Bonita Springs, FL 3 34
The Grantor, in co d O 100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and
other good and valuable co i 'o t t p d by the Grantee, the receipt
of which is hereby ackno id to the said Grantee and
Grantee's successors and orever, e o g property, situated, lying and
being in Collier County, Flo ' wit: n
See Exhibit "A" attach tf�o and incorpgr ")Verein by reference
SUBJECT TO: (a) ad valorem cff'em real property taxes for the year
of closing and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use
restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and
mineral interests of record, if any; (d) all covenants, declarations, restrictions,
reservations or easements of record or common to the development; and (e) all
matters describers in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: By acceptance of this
Deed, Grantee, and its successors and assigns, shall be obligated to re- convey to
Grantor, free from all liens and encumbrances and at no cost to Grantor, the
property identified as Parcels 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 74 in
the attached Exhibit "A" in the event that the principal balance of the Promissory
Note this date given from Grantee to Grantor, as evidenced by the Purchase
Money Mortgage recorded of even date herewith, is reduced, as more particularly
described in Sections 2.2(bxviii) and 22(e) of that certain Agreement for
Purchase and Sale between Grantor and Grantee dated June 21, 2005, as
amended. Grantor agrees that if the events described in said Section 2.2(b)(viii)
Wmwty Deed
Packet Page -544- Par No. I oft
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0869
that would cause the principal balance of such Promissory Note to be reduced do
not occur (i.e., there will be no reduction in the principal balance of the
Promissory Note), then Grantor will execute a release of these provisions for
recordation in the Public Records.
And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said property, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN W]TNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Warranty Deed the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in our pmenc-r.;-1
1—
mow- V . w
1 -U)rinted Name
nubb G — aasuaLur
Michele W.
Witness 2 - Printed Name
� GO
711E C11 C-
FAITH, INC., a Florida
, its President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COL.L MR
The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me on this �� day of
September, 2005, by Michael A. Taylor, as President and on behalf of Vision & Faith, Inc., a
Florida corporation, who is _personally or who has has produced
& W}}- DUOUS brPAE as identificatio .
••����, WALE W. CAMEL
Public - Signature
r My COMMISSO i DO W50
ry 14.2007
M EXPIAES:I> a
(SEAL)
Michele W. Caswell
Notary Public - Printed Name
s:Harold \Taylor Bates Group sale to Sembler.Warranty DeeV.doc
wg Deed
Packet Page -545- Page No. 2oof2
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0870
Ezhlblt "e
(9 pages)
Parcel 1:
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet.
Parcel 2:
The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section
Parcel 3:
The SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of
County, Florida, less the Wes
Parcel 4:
The S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 5:
The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of
Florida.
26 East, Collier County, Florida.
G
t e on 13, Townsh 50
30 tout t and ess
e 1 4 o th 4 n 13
ie 4 of Section 13, To t
h, Range 26 East, Collier
East 30 feet
ip 50 South, Range 26 East,
Range 26 East, Collier County,
Parcel 6: E CjR
The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13, Tow outh, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 7:
The NW 1/4 of the SW 114 of Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 8:
The S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 9:
The N 112 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 10:
The N 1/2 of the NW 114 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida, less the West 30 feet and less the East 30 feet
Parcel 11:
The W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14 Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida less the north 30 feet, less the south 30 feet and less the east 30 feet.
Packet Page -546-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0871
Parcel 12:
The N 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, less the West 100 feet.
Parcel 13:
The N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet.
Parcel 14:
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the West 100 feet.
Parcel 15:
The N 1/2 of the S 112 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the west 100 feet;
AND the Westerly 80 feet of the S 1/2 o W/ W i/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Flori .:tip. ��
Parcel 16:
The E 1/2 of the East 1/2 of qS1
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 17:
The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4
Florida.
Parcel 18:
The SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Se r` Township 50
Parcel 14: O� _
The NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 14,
1\1�'
4, 'Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
7 50 h, Range 26 East, Collier County,
5�O 6 East, Collier County, Florida.
26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 20:
The S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 21:
The NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 22:
The NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 23:
The N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 24:
The E 112 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Packet Page -547-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0872
Parcel 25:
The S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, less the Westerly 80 feet
Parcel 26:
The W 1/2 of SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida.
Parcel 27:
The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 28:
All that part of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the west 1/4 corner of o
thence along the.east and west 1/ " East 2673.55 feet to the center of said
Section 14 and the Point of 8egi he parcel herein ;
thence along the north and so section line North 00 05 ' 1" st 1341.85 feet to the north line of
the southwest 1/4 of the no ea 1 of saai
thence along said line North 70 '50 Eas 3 5 feet o a poi t o the east line of the southwest 1/4
of the northeast 1/4 of said
thence along said line Scut 00 9' 6" 1 4 . i t o the east and west 1/4 section
line;
thence leaving said line Sou ° 13 t; N
thence South 04 042'13" East 5 feet;
thence South 43° 12'04" West feet; Q
thence North 71 031'36" West 1 t;
thence North 77 °18'36' West 17 f
thence North 63 027'15" West 288.6E C
thence South 53 °31'25" West 74.43 feet;
thence South 41 057'31" West 65.80 feet;
thence South 16 001'06" West 80.79 feet;
thence South 11026'01" East 73.45 feet;
thence South 41 005'47" East 146.55 feet;
thence South 21 016'17" East 88.09 feet;
thence South 07 151'12" East 154.74 feet;
thence South 00 046'36" West 794.98 feet;
thence North 45 046'05" East 94.58 feet;
thence North 87 022'18" East 342.87 feet;
thence North 59 013'22" East 152.43 feet;
thence North 69 005'26" East 127.03 feet;
thence South 82 053'39" East 101.37 feet to the east line of northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of said
Section 14;
thence along said line South 00 049'36" West 25.15 feet;
thence leaving said line North 82 053'39" West 97.89 feet,
thence South 69 005'26° West 118.64 feet;
thence South 59 013'22" West 156.55 feet;
thence South 87 022'22" West 339.63 feet;
thence South 45 046'02" West 459.76 feet;
thence South 68 050'21" West 190.24 feet;
thence southwesterly 129.07 feet along the arc of a non - tangential circular curve concave to the
Packet Page -548-
9/11/2012 Item 9. B.
OR: 3895 PG: 0873
southeast having a radius of 110.00 feet through a central angle of 67 113'47" and being subtended by a
chord which bears South 35 013'27" West 121.79 feet;
thence South 01036'34" West 779.16 feet to the south line of said Section 14; thence along said south
line South 87 039'37" West 74.85 feet to the point on the north and south 1/4 section line;
thence along said line North 00 050'21" East 2683.10 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Parcel 29:
The N 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, less the West 100 feet
Parcel 30:
The S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida, less the West 100 feet.
Also less that portion described in Official Records Book 3241, Page 3460, Public Records of Collier
County, Florida.
Parcel 31: ���R CQ�
The NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Se ownship 50 Sou 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Less that portion described in ici ecords Book 3241, Pag 46 Public Records of Collier County,
Florida.
�� --- �,t1
Parcel 32:
The NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Parcel 33:
The NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of
Collier County, Florida.
1/4 of the SE 1/4
lt�
Parcel 34: - �U
The E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE
Florida.
26 last, Collier County, Florida.
H
50 South, Range 26 East,
South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Parcel 35:
The W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 36:
The SW 114 of the NE 1/4, Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 37:
The S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less
the West 100 feet.
Also less that portion described in Official Records Book 2192, Page 2057, and less that portion described
in Official Records Book 3241, Page 3460, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 38:
The NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 Fast, Collier
County, Florida.
Parcel 39:
The N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Packet Page -549-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0874
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 40:
The NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,
Florida.
Parcel 41:
The S 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 42:
The S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida..
Parcel 43:
The NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. ��R C0U
Parcel 44: Q l� �50Soulh?,� J
The NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of 5 4, Ton 26 East , Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 45:
The SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of
Parcel 46:
The E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of
Collier County, Florida.
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 47: `
The SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of 4, Township 50 So 6 East, and the W 112 of the SE 1/4
of the NE 1/4 of Section 24, Town uth, Range 2 Hier County, Florida.
Parcel 48: TIE CIRC,
The SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 49:
The N 1/2 of the SE 114 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 50:
The S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 51:
The S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 52:
The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 53:
The N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Packet Page -550-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0875
Parcel 54:
The NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 and the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 114 of the NE 1/4, Section 24, Township
50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 55:
The NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 56:
The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 57:
The East 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 58:
The W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/41 on 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Public Records of Collier County, Flo ;,A,L
Parcel 59:
The E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of
Collier County, Florida.
50 South, Range 26 East,
Parcel 60: V
That part of Section 25, To i 5 h R 2 East, e ' ularly described as follows: .
Beginning at a concrete mon t rkin st Section 2S; run N 00 013'20" E,
2722.27 feet to a concrete m ent marking the art r rr of said Section 25; thence N
89 016'34" W 1822.92 feet; th 00 033'02" W 113. t; S 88 056'47" W 1582.03 feet;
thence N 03 018'24" W1451.30 north line of said 5; thence S 87°06'54" W 1919.74
feet to a concrete monument ma orthwest cc r Section 25; thence S 00 013'07" E
2636.89 feet to a concrete monume ale' comer of said Section 25; thence S
00 013'07" E 2636.89 feet to a concrete n the southwest corner of said Section 25;
thence N 89 °12'25" E 2693.13 feet to a concrete monument marking the south quarter corner of said
Section 25; thence N 89 112'25" E 2693.13 feet to the point of beginning.
Together with an easement for roadway pursuant to deed recorded in Official Records Book 759, Page
1696, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 61:
The SW 1/4 of Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
Parcel 62:
The S 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
LESS and EXCEPT:
The West 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27, East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
Packet Page -551-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR; 3895 PG: 0876
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The East 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The West 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The East 1/2 of the NW 114 of the SW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT: 01orida. 1 R co
The East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the the West 1/2 o e h 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier n
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 t N 1/ of Ith4 will
South, Range 27 East, Collie
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of th� 4 of the East 1/2
South, Range 27 East, Collier Cou a.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT: E C
of Section 30, Township 50
i�
1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
The East 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the East 1/2 of the South 112 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
ALSO LESS and EXCEPT:
The West 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the West 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Section 30, Township 50
South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida.
Packet Page -552-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR; 3895 PG: 0877
Parcel 63: (former Streeter land - Parcel 12 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The W 1/2 of the SE 114 of the NW 114 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the North 30 feet.
Parcel 64: (former Streeter land - Parcel 11 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The W 112 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the South 30 feet.
Parcel 65: (former Blocker land - Parcel 1 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the West 50 feet.
Parcel 66: (former Blocker land - Parce e�� rroject No. 2032)
The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the 14� the SW 1/4 of Sectio wnship 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the rth 0 feet for road n ht -way.
Parcel 67: (former Blocker Ian -P r f i .2032)
The East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 o e 1/ e / 2 } T wnship 47 South, Range 27
East, Collier County, less the
d
Parcel 68: (former Blocker land el 4 of survey ident' s Pr o.2032)
The W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the the SW 1/4 of S feet wnshiied or South,
purposes7 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the West E R
Parcel 69: (former Blocker land - Parcel 5 of sury i ied as Project No. 2032)
The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the South 30 feet reserved for road purposes.
Parcel 70: (former Blocker land - Parcel 6.of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The West 112 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27
East, Collier County, Florida, less the south 30 feet reserved for road purposes.
Parcel 71: (former Blocker land - Parcel 7 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the South 30 feet reserved for road purposes.
Parcel 72: (former Blocker land - Parcel 8 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the South 30 feet.
Packet Page -553-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
OR: 3895 PG: 0878
Parcel 73: (former Blocker land - Parcel 9 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the North 30 feet reserved for road purposes.
Parcel 74: (former Blocker land - Parcel 10 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27
East, Collier County, Florida, less the North 30 feet and the West -50 feet for road right of way.
o\ E CI
Packet Page -554-
G
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR; 3895 PG; 0878
Parcel 73: (former Blocker land - Parcel 9 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27 East,
Collier County, Florida, less the North 30 feet reserved for road purposes.
Parcel 74: (former Blocker land - Parcel 10 of survey identified as Project No. 2032)
The West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 47 South, Range 27
East, Collier County, Fiorida, less the North 30 feet and the West-50 feet for road right of way.
/tE� corgi.
n u�
r
O� TIE CIR+
Packet Page -555-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0880
Roadway easement reserved in deed recorded in O.R. Book 289, Page 576. (Parcel 36)
Roadway easement reserved in deed recorded in O.R. Book 399, Page 520. (Parcel 32)
Roadway easements contained and reserved in deed recorded in O.R. Book 404, Page 997.
(Parcel 17, Parcel 21)
Road easement contained in deed recorded in O.R. Book 513, Page 840. (Parcel 8)
Easement reserved in O.R. Book 596, Page 1846. (Parcel 17)
Easement Dedication recorded in O.R. Book 597, Page 1870, as affected by Revocation of Offer
to Dedicate recorded in O.R. Book 2479, Page. 3372. (Parcel 22)
Oil, Gas and Mineral rights contained in deed to Auger Corporation recorded in O.R. Book 613,
Page 698. The right of entry as to such rights has not been released. (Parcel 60, Parcel 61,
Parcel 62)
Easement Grant recorded in O.R. Book 622, Page 1609. (Parcel 57)
Roadway easement reserved in O .i$3 A * 0. (Parcel 61)
ti {V
Right -of -Way Easement to n wer & Light Comp ded in O.R. Book 667, Page 317,
as affected by Right -of -W y ent between Ilse County Board of County
Commissioners and Flon a P we ht i' ecord in R. Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcels)
Right -of -Way Easemen to o a r t rn y rd in O.R. Book 668, Page
1751, as affected by Ri ent Ilier.County Board of County
Commissioners and Flo wer & Light Compa eco edA Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcel 12)
C
Right -of -Way Easement to r & Light Co rded in O.R. Book 673, Page
1843, as affected by Right -of- n Collier County Board of County
Commissioners and Florida Power rded in O.R. Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcel 13)
Right -of -Way Easement to Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 692, Page 774,
as affected by Right -of -Way Consent Agreement between Collier County Board of County
Commissioners and Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcel 30)
Roadway easement reserved in O.R. Book 759, Page 1696. (Parcel 60)
Easement for ingress and egress contained in deed recorded in O.R. Book 823, Page 1469.
(Parcel 34, Parcel 35)
Easement for roadway reserved in deed recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. (Parcel 62)
Right -of -Way Easement to Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 870, Page 343,
as affected by Right -of -Way Consent Agreement between Collier County Board of County
Commissioners and Florida Power & Light Company recorded In O.R. Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcel 29)
Packet Page -556-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR: 3895 PG: 0881
Easement and right of way for ingress and egress recorded in O.R. Book 882, Page 1867. (Parcel
29, Parcel 31, Parcel 34, Parcel 35)
Easement for ingress and egress contained in deed recorded in O.R. Book 928, Page 296. (Parcel
49, Parce1,50)
Easement Dedication recorded in O.R. Book 981, Page 296. (Parcel 34, Parcel 35)
Grant of Easement for right of way and utilities recorded in O.R. Book 1196, Page 288. (Parcel 2)
Non - exclusive easement for utility purposes to Collier County recorded in O.R. Book 1247, Page
2352. (Parcel 28)
Right of way and utilities easement contained in deed recorded in O.R. Book 1270, Page 1135.
(Parcel 4)
Grant of Easement for water adke cement provisions contained therein
recorded in O.R. Book 134 , 2. (Parse �r
G 1-^
Easement for ingress. d ed*1ndeedreco ed i O.R. Book 1342, Page 2374.
(Parcel 60)
Road right -of -way a se n co it d in r in O.R Book 1353, Page 1955. (Parcel
27) n. 1L--q
Easement to Florida & Light Company r in k 1576, Page 1901. (Parcel 46)
Roadway and public util' 4 pq ment contained in 1`i riled in O.R. Book 1611, Page 276.
(Parcel 56) C�RC�
Terms and conditions of Consent Fina u gment between the State of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, Swamp Buggy, Inc. a /k/a Swamp Buggy Days Recreation and Sports
Park recorded in O.R. Book 2007, Page 232. (Parcel 28)
Easement for road right of way contained in deed recorded in O.R. Book 2023, Page 378. (Parcel
46)
Terms, conditions, covenants, restrictions, easements and other matters contained in Declaration
of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for The Florida Sports Park, which contains provisions
for maintenance assessments, recorded in O.R. Book 2134, Page 1041. (Parcel 28)
Easement and Use Agreement between Swamp Buggy, Inc. and Collier County Junior Deputies
League, Inc. recorded in O.R. Book 2134, Page 1055. (Parcel 28)
Utility Facilities Reimbursement Agreement recorded in O.R. Book 2151, Page 748. (Parcel 37)
Roadway and public utilities easement contained in O.R. Book 2338, Page 3144. (Parcel 16)
Packet Page -557-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR; 3895 PG: 0882
Easements and rights of use reserved in deed recorded in O.R. Book 2405, Page 1826. (Parcel
28)
Easement to Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 2464, Page 3113. (Parcel 16)
Restriction set forth in Warranty Deed from Everglades Sporting Clays Association, Inc. to Team
Synervision of Naples, Inc. recorded in O.R. Book 2590, Page 2071, which prohibits the use of
the land described in Schedule A, less Parcels 63 through 74, for purposes of shotgun ranges of
any type for a period of 20 years from the date of such deed; and acknowledgment as to possible
lead contamination.
Ingress Egress Easement recorded in O.R. Book 2597, Page 396. (Parcel 32)
Use restrictions contained in deed from Vision & Faith, Inc. to Collier HMA, Inc. recorded in O.R.
Book 3241, Page 3460. (Parcel 30, Parcel 31, Parcel 37)
Joint Access Easement Agree t kA
O.R. Book 3241, Page 346. ara
G
Easement for roadway . Book
18, Parcel 20, Parcel 3, P r arcel 39,
Easement for ingres an res se f i
O.R. Book 1795, Pa e� 7. (P 1 )
Easement to Florida r & Light Company re�
Right -of -way Consent ` ent between Coll
Florida Power & Light recorded in O.R.
.02, -
Inc. and Collier HMA, Inc. recorded in
lge1.XParcel 6, Parcel 7, Parcel 8, Parcel
40, rce 41)
in R. Book 968, Page 975 and
I-
p.
enZ k 850, Page 976, affected by
of County Commissioners and
,Page 1047. (Parcel 14, Parcel 15)
Easement to Florida Power &� in Order of Taking dated May 28, 1980
under Case No. 80- 0089 -CA and in al Judgment recorded in O.R. Book 1129, Page
20, as affected by Right -of -Way Consent Agreement between Collier County Board of County
Commissioners and Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 3857, Page 1047.
(Parcel 14, Parcel 15)
Easement Collier County recorded in O.R. Book 981, Page 292. (Parcel 25)
Easement to Collier County recorded in O.R. Book 981, Page 294. (Parcel 14)
Easement to Swamp Buggy Days, Inc. recorded in O.R. 1156, Page 927. (Parcel 25)
Access Easement to Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 3050, Page 3433.
(Parcel 14)
Access Easement to Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 3129, Page 2252.
(Parcel 15)
Environmental Resource Permit Notice by South Florida Water Management District recorded in
O.R. Book 3845, Page 2681. (Parcel 29, Parcel 30, Parcel 31, Parcel 37)
Packet Page -558-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
* ** OR: 3895 PG: 0883 * **
proceeolngs pending in the OraAt.Court of Collier County, Florida, under Case No. 05 -1275, in
the matter of Boars! of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida v. Vision Ik Faith, Inc.
eta[, as disclosed by Notice of Us Pendens recorded July 29, 2005 in O.R. Book 3856, Page
2139. (Parcel 1, Parcel 12, Parcel 13, Parcel 14, Parcel 15, Parcel 29, Parcel 30, Parcel 31)
Oil, gas and mineral reservations contained in Deed from Barron Collier, Jr. and Miles Collier
recorded in Deed Book 30, Page 91, and in Deed from Brace Corporation recorded in Deed Book
45, Page 365. The right of entry as bo such rights has not been released. (Parcel 65, Parcel 66,
Parcel '67, Parcel 68, Parcel 69, Parcel 70, Parcel 71, Parcel 72, Parcel 73, Parcel 74)
Covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in and easements reserved In deeds recorded In
O.R. Book 255, Page 632, O.R. Book 172, Page 443, O.R. Book 46, Page 599, O.R. Book 119,
Page 544, O.R. Book 41, Page 355, O.R. Book 44, Page 498, O.R. Book 113, Page 432, O.R. Book
388, Page 30, O.R. Book 123, Page 122 and O.R. Book 110, Page 457. (Parcel 65, Parcel 66,
Parcel 67, Parcel 66, Parcel 69, Parl,r }�Pr�l 72, Parcel 73, Parcel 74)
Ordinances 75-20 (water), 7 ) and 75-24 iRf�j , d in O.R. Book 619, Pages
1177 -1381. (AII Parcels)
Collier County Orddlnan 90 bli b are oral and providing for
impact fees. (Ail Pa )
The public records do a I al o r c ri ,rt reel 2, Parcel 5, Parcel 64,
Parcel 70, Parcel 71 a , a s does not insure any right of
access to and from sal 5 and the printed 'sic of icy insuring access to Parcel
2, Parcel 5, Parcel 64, i 0, Parcel 71 and Pa deleted In their entirety.
Matters disclosed on serve r by Banks Engi dated June 12, 2005 and
revised on August 10, 2005 a Qc1D, 290 ject No. 1429.
CIS
Matters disclosed on survey Prepared by an ngineering, Inc. dated December 17, 2004 and
last revised on February 18, 2005, under Project No. 2032.
Packet Page -559-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
INSTR 4393149 OR 4536 PG 732 RECORDED 2/9/2010 11:28 AM PAGES 2
DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DOG 9.70 $0.70 REC S18.50
CONS SO.00
This instrument Prepared $y:
Harold J. Webre, Esquire
HAROLD J. WEBRE, P.A.
1804 S. Florida Avenue
Lakeland, FL 33803
c;
-QUITCLAIM DEED
BY THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, dated this -� Z day of January, 2010,
GEORGE P. BAUER C'Grantor's, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and
No/100 U.S. Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, hereby
remises, releases and quitclaims all of Grantors' right, title, interest, claim and demand
in the following described real property located in Collier County, Florida to WILTON
LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Flori lability company ("Grantee"), whose
post office address is 206 Du t r_ 6897:
o�
The Southeast Quarte 114) of the
Northeast Quarter 1 } ec
Collier County, Flo ' a.
Parcel Identilicatio H er:,, 0M1 4
*THE SUBJECT PROP IS NOT THE
GRANTOR
IN WITNESS
Deed the day and year first ab
Signed, sealed and delivered in
our presence: _
Witness 1— Signature
Witness 1 - Printed Name
7)
Witness 2 — Signature
Wit ess 2 - nn a @Nam
/C)
C'/
irter (NW 1/4) of the
South, Range 26 East,
FON
delivered this Quit Claim
George P. Wuer
Packet Page -560-
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
* ** OR 4536 PG 733 * **
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
COUNTY OF Z�70.-tiS i `—1 CL
The foregoing Quit Claim Deed was acknowledged before me on this o11 day of
January, 2010, by George P. Bauer, who is personally known to me or
produced as identification.
otary ublic — Signature
(SEAL)
Public - Printed Name
r
'0
2
Packet Page -561-
0
January 31, 2014
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
INSTR 4388118 OR 4531 PG 2872 RECORDED 1/26/2010 4:17 PM PAGES 9
DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DOC @.70 $210,000.00 REC $78.00 INDX $4.00
CONS $30,000,000.00
.6k • .
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP #42, Ltd.,
a Florida limited partnership and
TOLL - RATTLESNAKE, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company
Plaintiffs,
VS.
TOLL FL VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Florida limited partnership, TOLL BROS.,
INC., a Pennsylvania corporation,
11 LLC, a Florida limited liabili
VISION & FAITH, INC., a Flo ' oratiol
GEORGE P. BAUER, and C EL A.
TAYLOR,
Defendants
GEORGE P. BAUER and
a Florida corporation,
vs.
Case No. 08- 2136- CA -HDH
C(OE-
S FAITH, INC., �O
Counter - claimants, ?'CIE CIRC
TOLL-RATTLESNAKE, LLC, a Florida limited -
liability company, SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ; ` Es
#42, LTD., a Florida limited partnership and TOLL ✓
FL 11, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,
�cl
Counter - defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk and Comptroller of the above - entitled Court, do
hereby certify that I executed and filed ,a Certificate of Sale in this action on
Jr , 2010, for the real property described herein, and that no objections
Packet Page -562-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR 4531 PG 2873
to the sale have been filed within the time allowed for filing objections. The real
property as described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
was sold to:
Wilton Land Company, LLC
206 Dudley Road
Wilton, CT 06897
WITNESS my hand and seal on this Court, on ?- . 2010.
D K, Clerk & CQmptrollec
f�
G0
rk '' uJ
i wt i. 1- •J V
Copies fumished to: �' • �'
1 ,
77/10 .� Louis D_ D'Agostino, Esq.' 'Ct
�! ✓ Samuel J. Heller, Esq. r� O '�,.,,,,...•-' .
J Ira William Spivey, II G
9483.14511 $438 `
Packet Page -563-
OR 4531 PG 2874
• 0
EXHIBIT "A"
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
PARCEL1:
THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
PARCEL2:
THE E 112 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL3:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 4:
THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
50
H
WA i
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
26 EAST, COLLIER
26 EAST, COLLIER
13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
PARCEL 9:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 10:
THE N 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SW 114 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 11:
THE W 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 12:
THE N 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
PARCEL 13:
THE N 112 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
Packet Page -564-
Cot
PARCEL 5:
THE W 112 OF THE NE 1/4 OF TH
F SECTION 1
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FL OR A.
PARCELS:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 114 S
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 7: n
THE NW 114 OF THE SW 1/4 O TION
13, TOWNS
COUNTY, FLORIDA. `
PARCEL 8:
THE S 112 OF THE NW 114 OF THE4
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
C I
50
H
WA i
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
26 EAST, COLLIER
26 EAST, COLLIER
13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
PARCEL 9:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 10:
THE N 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SW 114 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 11:
THE W 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 12:
THE N 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
PARCEL 13:
THE N 112 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
Packet Page -564-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OR 4531 PG 2875
PARCEL 16:
THE E 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL17:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 18:
THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 19:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 20:
THE S 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL21:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF CTION 14, TO SH 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. r-.
PARCEL22: V
THE NE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 0 El E 4, HI 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FL r -
PARCEL 23: '~
THE N 112 OF THE SE 114 OF T 1/4 OF SECTION 1 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0
PARCEL 24:
THE E 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NE 114 F SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA-
PARCEL 26:
THE W 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 114 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 27:
THE E 112 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 28:
ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE WEST 114 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST 114 SECTION LINE, NORTH 87 °3346" EAST 2673.55 FEET
TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 14 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN
DESCRIBED;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH 114 SECTION LINE NORTH 00 °50'21" EAST 1341.85
FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION
14;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 87 °30'50" EAST 1336.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE
Packet Page -565-
OR 4531 PG 2876
0 •
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00 °49'36" WEST 1342.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST AND
WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE;
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89 °44'17" WEST 134.30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04 042'13" EAST 210.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 43 °12'04" WEST 178.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 71 °31'36" WEST 145.23 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 77 °18'36' WEST 175.92 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 63 °27'15" WEST 288.67 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 53 °31'25" WEST 74.43 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41 °5T3l" WEST 65.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16 °01'06" WEST 80.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 11 °26'01" EAST 73.45 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 41 005'47" EAST 146.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 21 °1617" EAST 88.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 07 °51'12" EAST 154.74 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 °46'36" WEST 794.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45 046'05" EAST 94.58 F,
THENCE NORTH 87 °22'18" EAST 342. c�trj
THENCE NORTH 59 °13'22" EAST 1 ;
THENCE NORTH 69 005'26" EAST EET;
THENCE SOUTH 82 °53'39" EAS 10 O THE EAST LI E O NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SEC 0 14
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S '3 1
THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE 0 '
THENCE SOUTH 69 °05'26" ST 1 64 E ;
THENCE SOUTH 59 °13'22"
THENCE SOUTH 87M22- 39.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45 °46'02" WE 1 9.76 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 68 °50'21" WE 24 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 129. ALONG THE ARC N- TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOU ING A RA 0.00 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67 01347" AND C CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH
35 °13'27" WEST 121.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 °36'34" WEST 779.16 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 87 °39'37" WEST 74.85 FEET TO THE POINT ON THE
NORTH AND SOUTH 1/4 SECTION LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00 °5021" EAST 2683.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 29:
THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET AND LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET.
PARCEL 30:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET.
ALSO LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460; PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 31:
THE NE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE
3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 32:
Packet Page -566-
OR 4531 PG 2877
0 0
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
THE NE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 33:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 34:
THE E 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 35:
THE W 112 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 36:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 114, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA. � co�&
PARCEL 37:
THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SE 3, TOWNSHIP 50
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE ES V9 FI= T.
ALSO LESS THAT PORTION S
LESS THAT PORTION DESC BE I O CI(A�
RECORDS OF COLLIER COU F RI A jI
n
PARCEL 38:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 0 NE 114 OF S
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO
PARCEL 39:
THE N 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THESE 1
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO
H
26 EAST, COLLIER
2192, PAGE 2057, AND
PAGE 3460, PUBLIC
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
PARCEL 40:
THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 41:
THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 42:
THE S 112 OF THE N 112 OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 43:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 44:
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 45:
Packet Page -567-
OR 4531 PG 2878
• le
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 46:
THE E 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 47:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND THE W
1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 4B:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 49:
THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY
PARCEL 50: 1
THE S 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF T N
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER CO , F�
PARCEL 51:
THE S W OF THE NE 114 OF
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER C
PARCEL 52:
THE W 112 OF THE NE 114 OF
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER C!
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
1 r.
ESW1 /4OFS TI N
E T ON
F-
1/4 OF THE SW 1
PARCEL 53:
THE N 112 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
G F SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
PARCEL 54:
THE NE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 AND THE N 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION
24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 55:
THE NE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 56:
THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 57:
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 58:
THE W 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Packet Page -568-
OR 4531 PG 2879
0 0
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
PARCEL 59:
THE E 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE SE 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 60:
THAT PART OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; RUN N 00 013'20" E, 2722.27 FEET TO A CONCRETE
MONUMENT MARKING THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N 89 016'34"
W 1822.92 FEET; THENCE N 00 °33'02" W 1130.79 FEET; THENCE S 88 °5647" W 1582.03 FEET;
THENCE N 03 °18'24" W 1451.30 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S
87 °06'54" W 1919.74 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 00 °13'07" E 2636.89 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT
MARKING THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 00 013'07" E 2636.89
FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25;
THENCE N 69 °12'25" E 2693.13 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTH
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N 89 012"25" E 2693.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. COT ;�
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT
RECORDS BOOK 759, PAGE 169
PARCEL 61:
THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19, OV
FLORIDA.
PARCEL 62:
THE S 12 OF SECTION 30, TO
LESS AND EXCEPT:
OWAY PUR-St
RECORDS OF
P 50 SOUTH,
�O
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27,
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
(COUNTY, FLORIDA.
H
COLLIER COUNTY,
COUNTY, FLORIDA-
! OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
, FLORIDA.
THE WEST 12 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 114 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 12 OF THE SW 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 12 OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 12 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 12 OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 12 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SW 114 OF THE EAST 12 OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
Packet Page -569-
* ** OR 4531 PG 2880 * **
0 0
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 114 OF THE SE 114 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 12 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT:
THE EAST 12 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 12 OF THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EA - NTY, FLORIDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: /O'4v
THE E 12 OF THE SE 114 01 T E Y44f-:�HE EAST 12 0 H OUTH 12 OF SECTION 30,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANG 27 SA-GQLLTER FL RI
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: n
THE EAST 12 OF THE NE 114 CDli 4.DF E ST O SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RA 27 EAST, OLLIE OUN IDA.
ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: U
THE WEST 12 OF THE NE 1/4 OF 4 OF THE 1 r F THE SOUTH 12 OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 2 '',�C , FLORIDA.
Q
Packet Page -570-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
IN RE: PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE
HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AFFIDAVIT ADOPTION WRITTEN, PRE -FILED TESTIMONY
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
I, Dwight Nadeau, AICP, of RWA, Inc., a Florida corporation, being duly sworn, do hereby state
for my affidavit as follows:
1. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in this affidavit.
2. My name is Dwight Nadeau, AICP, and I am an employee of RWA, Inc., a Florida
corporation.
3. The prepared, written, pre -filed testimony, submitted under my name to Collier
County relating to the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District, and attached hereto, is true and correct.
4. If I were asked the questions contained in the pre -filed testimony orally at the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District establishment hearing on
, 20_, my oral answers would be the same as the written answers
presented in my pre -filed testimony.
Packet Page -571-
1
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
My pre -filed testimony generally addresses the nature of the services and facilities to
be provided by the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development District, the
truth and accuracy of the Petition to establish the proposed District, and compliance
with the factors to be considered in the establishment of a community development
district.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and the facts alleged
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executive this 23 day of March , 2012.
UBSCRIBED before me by the Affiant, on this A� of
qQ� , 'A2 ,
ANNA VICTORIA ROSA
. :.: MY COMMISSION p EE 000221
?s r. EXPIRES: October 13, 2014
1? of ry,.` Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters
Personally Known
Type Identification produced
Packet Page -572-
Notary Public State of Florida
om,,.' &34-
Typed Name of Notary Public
2
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
TESTIMONY OF DWIGHT HAMILTON NADEAU, AICP
1. Please state your name and business address.
Dwight Hamilton Nadeau, AICP, of RWA, Inc., a Florida corporation, whose office
is located at 6610 Willow Park Drive, Naples, Florida, 34109
2. By whom are you employed and in what capacity?
I am employed by RWA, Inc., as a professional planner certified by the American
Institute of Certified Planners.
3. And what is the nature of your firm's business?
RWA is a multi - disciplinary land development consulting firm for public and private
clients in the fields of planning, surveying, and civil engineering.
4. Please describe your experience and credentials, including your current
employment.
Over the past twenty three years (12 years as Planning Director for McAnly Engineering
and Design, and 11 years as Planning Manager for RWA, Inc.) as a private sector,
professional urban planner, I have been responsible for coordinating and managing
resource allocations for planning related tasks associated with land use entitlements,
and/or civil engineering projects. I provide complex analysis of land use issues to
provide resolution guidance to my client base, as well as representation of client
development intentions with the various governmental review staff, and in public
hearings. My experience provides a multi - disciplinary resource such that I may proffer
expert land development planning counsel that spans from beachfront resort
development, master planned communities, commercial /industrial development, to rural
land use opportunities. I specialize in project planning and management, public
participation, comprehensive planning, and land use regulation oversight. I have had key
involvement in Developments of Regional Impact, growth management plan
amendments, rezonings, special exceptions in the form of provisional and conditional
uses, variances, land development code amendments, local development order approvals,
and land use feasibility studies.
Prior to my entry into the private sector planning community in 1989, I was a staff
planner for two years, employed by Collier County, Florida. I was responsible for land
use analysis of land use petitions requiring public hearings before the Collier County
Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. I authored three Zoning
Ordinance amendments, including providing for integral mixed -use development
provisions in the commercial and industrial zones, and the creation of a commercial
professional infill zoning district. I was also instrumental in the promulgation of the
1989 sign regulations. In addition to my work on land use petitions and drafting land use
Packet Page -573-
9/11/2012 Item 93.
regulation, I reviewed zoning compliance matters associated with numerous development
plan requests for issuance of administrative development orders.
5. Please describe your educational background, with degrees earned, major areas
of study, year of degree, institutions attended.
I hold a Bachelor of Science Degree (1984), in Natural Resources Management with
emphasis in land use planning from the University of Alaska.
6. Do you hold any professional designations or certifications?
I hold certification (Certified Planner Number 024609) from the American Institute of
Certified Planners.
7. Are you a member of any professional association?
I am a member of the American Planning Association, Florida Chapter. I am also a
member of the Florida Planning and Zoning Association.
8. Prior to your current employment, by whom were you employed and in what
position?
Prior to employment with RWA in 2001, I was employed by McAnly Engineering and
Design, Inc. as Planning Director for twelve years of service as a private sector planner.
9. Have you previously worked with other CDD petitions? Have you previously
prepared a Statement of Regulatory Costs ( "SERC ")?
Yes, I have worked on other CDD petitions. I have not prepared a Statement of
Regulatory Costs.
10. Have you ever been qualified as an expert in the preparation of such testimony
regarding Community Development Districts?
Yes.
11. Please summarize your previous work experience relating to CDDs and special
districts in general?
I have participated in the applications for two CDDs by preparing two planner's "white
paper" testimonies. One for a development known as Naples Heritage Golf and Country
CIub that was adopted by the Collier County Board of Commissioners, and second for a
proposed development to be known as Lely Lakes, but that application was ultimately
withdrawn from the petition process and was never adopted
Packet Page -574- 2
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
12. Where in Florida are the districts with which you have worked?
The Naples Heritage Community Development District is located in Collier County,
Florida.
13. Please list the proceedings in which you have been qualified as an expert witness
regarding the establishment (including contractions and /or additions to) of CDDs
and the operation and management of CDDs.
September 24, 1996, Collier County Board of Commissioners public hearing for the
adoption of the Naples Heritage CDD.
14. Do you consider yourself and expert in economic analysis and forecasting in
regard to CDDs?
No.
15. Are you familiar with the geographical areas, type, and scope of development
and the available services and facilities within the Hacienda Lakes CDD?
Yes.
16. Are you familiar with the Petition filed to establish the Hacienda Lakes CDD?
Yes.
17. What has been your role with respect to the Petition to Establish ( "Petition ")
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District ( "Hacienda Lakes CDD)?
The preparation of this "white paper" testimony.
18. Please generally describe each of the exhibits attached to the Petition.
Exhibit 1 is a project location map for the proposed CDD.
Exhibit 2 is the legal description for the proposed CDD.
Exhibit 3 is an affidavit of ownership and consent to the creation of the proposed CDD.
Exhibit 3A is the proposed schematic, stormwater plan for the CDD.
Exhibit 3B is the proposed schematic, wastewater conveyance plan for the CDD.
Exhibit 3C is the proposed schematic, potable water distribution plan for the CDD.
Exhibit 4 is a existing land use map.
Exhibit 5 depicts the boundary of the land intended to be included in the proposed CDD.
Exhibit 6 is the proposed development plan for the CDD.
Exhibit 7 is the existing public utilities plan.
Exhibit 8 includes the estimated costs of the proposed CDD improvements.
Exhibit 9 is the proposed time table for construction of CDD improvements.
Exhibit 10 is the Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs for the proposed CDD.
Packet Page -575-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
19. Are the contents of the Petition and the exhibits attached to it true and correct to
the best of your knowledge as of the date your prepared testimony is filed?
Yes.
20. Why is Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC petitioning for an ordinance to establish
the Hacienda Lakes CDD?
The petition to establish a special purpose local government is to efficiently and
economically provide for essential infrastructure to service the business and residential
land uses that will eventually be located within the boundaries of the CDD. This is being
pursued to implement specific provisions of the State Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in
Chapter 187, Florida Statutes. Establishment of the District is consistent with Policy
15(b)l. Chapter 190, F.S., establishes that a District purpose is to provide necessary
capital infrastructure to service projected growth without overburdening other
governments and taxpayers. The state legislature determined that a District is a
legitimate alternative method of paying for and managing community development.
Establishment of the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District is consistent with
this legislative intent, is consistent with Policy 17(b)4. Once the Hacienda Lakes
Community Development District is formed, it will function as a form of local
government and the Statute permits the District to enter into interlocal agreements with
other local governments. The Collier County Growth Management Plan,
Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Public Facilities Element provide for the
coordination and cooperation of all governmental entities, including Community
Development Districts. Because the Statute requires consistency with the local
government growth management plan, and the District must cooperate with local
governments, it is my opinion that the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community
Development District will be consistent with Policy 20(b) l of the State Comprehensive
Plan.
Let me ask you a few questions about certain opinions you may have based on your
experience in CDD management, real estate development and the development of
lands within the Hacienda Lakes CDD in particular.
21. Based on your experience in CDD management, do you have an opinion as to
whether the proposed Hacienda Lakes CDD is of sufficient size, sufficient
compactness, and sufficient contiguity to be developed as a functionally interrelated
community?
Yes.
22. What is the basis for your opinion?
The proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development District is of sufficient size and
sufficiently compact to be developed as a functional interrelated community. The
project's size is approximately 615.2 acres. This land area is large enough in land area to
Packet Page -576- 4
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
allow for the efficient provision of infrastructure systems, facilities and services. A
project of this size and scope is most appropriately master planned to demonstrate how
the various components of the overall project relate both internally and externally. Collier
County encourages development to utilize the Planned Unit Development Zoning in
order to demonstrate a master plan of development for large scale communities. Hacienda
Lakes will be developed in phases concurrent with provision of infrastructure.
The project is appropriately compact in that it will permit residential development and the
required infrastructure support to be extended throughout the proposed District
boundaries as one functional interrelated community. The properties within the proposed
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District are contiguous.
The term "functional interrelated community" is undefined in Chapter 190, F.S. In my
professional planning opinion, the term, "functional interrelated community" means that
the CDD area has common characteristics in that permitted land uses that can be master
planned because of the land use relationships, as well as the contiguity of the community
and its overall size. The proposed District will utilize the planned unit development
concept to demonstrate the interrelatedness of the entire project, whereby not only the
internal and external land use relationships have been shown, but the basic infrastructure
to serve the entire community is master planned. Hacienda Lakes is consistent with and
furthers the larger community's goals as outlined in the discussion on the Collier County
Growth Management Plan.
23. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether Hacienda Lakes
CDD is the best alternative available to provide community development services
and facilities to the area that will be served?
Yes
24. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
There are several alternative ways to provide basic infrastructure and services to the lands
proposed to be serviced by the proposed Community Development District. Generally,
there are three common methods of providing services to a community, which include
privately funded and maintained services, publicly provided systems and those that could
be operated via a public special purpose Community Development District. Private
provision of services and maintenance can be appropriate; however, with limitations, in
that long -term funding must be assured to support infrastructure for the life of the
community, as is required through the issuance of bonds to support a Community
Development District.
The provision of services by the public can have limitations, especially where the
community is a master planned and interrelated community that may desire services more
appropriately directed at its property owners. The responsibility of a local government is
to provide the basic infrastructure support for all communities within its governmental
boundary. A master planned community that may wish to achieve a higher than basic
standard provided by local government, and will not be well suited to provision of
services through common general government funding alternatives.
Packet Page -577- 5
9/11 /2012 Item 9.13.
The Community Development District option is a preferred alternative in that the
provision of services may be commensurate with the desired level of service of the
community, while resulting in no burden to those properties or residents outside the
District. The Community Development District cannot overburden the existing facilities
because of the required concurrency management requirements found in the Collier
County Growth Management Plan, Land Development Code and Chapter 190, F S.
25. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the services and
facilities to be provided by Hacienda Lakes CDD will be compatible with the land
uses and existing local and regional facilities and services?
Yes.
26. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
Chapter 190, F.S. requires that all actions and implementation of any or all Community
Development District powers are governed by and must not be inconsistent with the
Collier County Growth Management Plan. One of the fundamental requirements of
Chapter 163, F.S. is that local government comprehensive plans must identify capital
facilities required to support expected growth and that standards must be adopted to
insure that minimum established levels of service for these facilities can be maintained.
This requirement insures that the impacts of development are created concurrent with the
available capacity of necessary capital infrastructure. Development may not occur unless
there are adequate public facilities available to support it.
These requirements insure compliance with County land development regulations and
adequate public facility requirements. Collier County has not identified any inadequate
public facilities that will prohibit development within the proposed District.
27. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the area to be
included within the Hacienda Lakes CDD is amendable to bring served by a
separate special district government?
Yes.
28. What is the basis for your opinion?
The land area is of sufficient size, and is sufficiently compact and sufficiently contiguous
to be a functional community. The project area is also located in an area where other
large -scale master planned communities have been developed utilizing the community
development district. In my opinion the land area for the District is amenable to special
district government because the land area proposed to be established as a District has the
need for the services and at a level that may be provided by the District. The District
would also benefit from the provision of District services in that the services will be
tailored to the specific needs of the District while consistent with the goals, objectives
and policies of the local growth management plan.
Packet Page -578- 6
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Turning to the economic exhibits and opinions, we will begin addressing portion of
the Petition to Establish the Hacienda Lakes CDD boundaries that relate to certain
economic analysis matters, including the exhibits and your expert opinions on
economic analysis issues.
29. Are you familiar with the S.E.R.C.?
Yes.
30. How familiar?
Generally familiar.
31. Are there any corrections required?
No.
32. In general terms, please summarize the economic analysis you have presented in
the SERC.
I have not provided any economic analysis associated with the SERC.
33. Please describe briefly the data and methodology you used in preparing the
SERC and related analysis.
I have not provided any analysis associated with the SERC.
Turning now to the state and local comprehensive plan criteria of Section
190.005(l)(e)2., do you have an opinion as to whether the establishment of Hacienda
Lakes CDD is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the State
Comprehensive Plan?
Yes.
34. What is your opinion?
That the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes CDD is not inconsistent with any
applicable element or portion of the State Comprehensive Plan.
35. What is the basis for that opinion?
The State Comprehensive Plan is set forth in Chapter 187, Florida Statutes. I have
reviewed all twenty -five goals and several related policies under each goal in the
State Plan from this perspective. I have identified and evaluated those subjects,
goals and policies that do relate to the creation and establishment of a Community
Development District. As a professional planner, I have provided an opinion as to
Packet Page -579- 7
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
the consistency of proposed District with each related goal, objective and policy of
the plan. I have analyzed from a planning perspective each subject and goal and
then identified various specific policies under each of them which related to the
proposed District.
36. What is Subject 15 and why is it relevant?
Subject 15 is also Goal 15, and is applicable because it directs development to areas
having, or programmed to have funded land and water resources, and necessary
infrastructure capacity to serve growth in an environmentally responsible manner.
The Hacienda Lakes Development Order (Resolution No. 2011 -227, adopted
December 13, 2011, which expanded the Collier County Water Sewer District), is in
an area of Collier County that has available access to regional water and sewer
services, and roadway networks to serve a project of this scale. The District is
located in the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict, and the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Fringe Subdistrict, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, and the
Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands, as
depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map from the Future Land Use
Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The development has
been found to meet all applicable goals, objectives and policies related to natural
resources. The creation of the District is consistent with this goal of the State Plan.
The Hacienda Lakes CDD is within the Collier County Water and Sewer District,
and will meet the provisions of the Collier County Concurrency Management
System.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 15(b)l. Promote state programs, investments, and development and
redevelopment activities, which encourage efficient
development and occur in areas which will have the capacity to
service new population and commerce.
Establishment of the District is consistent with this policy. Chapter 190, F.S.,
establishes that a District purpose is to provide necessary capital infrastructure to
service projected growth without overburdening other governments and taxpayers.
All necessary on -site infrastructures will be provided by the Developer or
Community Development District, which will be coordinated with Collier County
Government. All development will be consistent with the Collier County Capital
Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Policy 15(b)2. Develop a system of incentives and disincentives, which
encourage separation of urban and rural land uses while
Packet Page -580- 8
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
protecting water supplies, resource development, and fish and
wildlife habitats.
A District is a form of local government which, is required by law to provide service
capacity in areas designated for urban services, and to provide such services in an
environmentally sensitive manner. The Establishment of the proposed District is
consistent with policy 15(b)2 of the State Plan. The Hacienda Lakes Community is
located within an area designated for urban levels of development on the Collier
County Future Land Use Map.
Policy 15(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through
the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of
living, working, shopping, and recreational activities.
Establishment of the District is consistent with this Policy. Through the creation of
the District, Hacienda Lakes will be developed as a master planned residential
community with on -site recreational and personal services amenities designed to
serve the residents of the District within the designated recreational components of
the project. Onsite open spaces are linked to nearby preservation areas providing for
contiguous passive recreational opportunities.
37. What is Subject 20 and why is it relevant?
Subject 20 is also Goal 20, and requires governments to efficiently and effectively
provide public services to meet the demand of the public. Chapter 190.002 finds that an
independent district can be a solution to the state's planning, management, and
financing needs by providing timely, efficient, effective and economic means of
service delivery. The proposed District will provide services in an economical and
efficient manner to residents of the District and is consistent with Goal 20.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 20(b)2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts,
which have uniform general law standards and procedures and
do not overburden other governments and their taxpayers
while preventing the proliferation of independent special
taxing districts, which do not meet these standards.
This policy directly addresses why a Community Development District is a beneficial
method of funding community development services. A Community Development
District provides the infrastructure and community services through the sale of
various types of bonds, for which the obligation to repay the bonds is borne by only
those who directly receive the benefits provided by the Community Development
Packet Page -581- 9
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
District. The general taxpayer has no obligation to pay for services within the
District.
The Community Development District must be established according to the
standards specified in the Florida Statutes and must be consistent with local
government plans. The proliferation of independent districts is restricted by the
various factors required to establish a Community Development District. The
proposed Community Development District in my professional planning opinion is
consistent with Policy 20(b)2.
Policy 20(b)5. Eliminate needless duplication of, and promote cooperation
in, governmental activities between, among, and within state,
regional, county, city, and other governmental units.
As stated previously, a District is required under the Florida Statutes to prepare
reports and public records with respect to its facilities and operations which are
made available to owners within the Community Development District, as well as
prospective purchasers. These records are also filed with the County as public
records and may be utilized by the local government. This cooperative requirement
of sharing information as well as the requirement to be consistent with the State and
local government plans furthers the proposed Community Development District's
consistency with Policy 20(b)5.
Policy 20(b)9. Encourage greater efficiency and economy at all levels of
government through adoption and implementation of effective
records management, information management, and
evaluation procedures.
Florida Statutes, Chapter 190, requires that Community Development Districts
perform extensive record keeping and management, and they are subject to the
Florida Sunshine Law. In my professional planning opinion, these requirements of
the Community Development District fulfill the requirements of Policy 20(b)9, and
the establishment of the District is consistent with this policy.
38. What is Subject 25 and why is it relevant?
Subject 25 is also Goal 25, and mandates the integration of systematic planning for the
purposes of improving intergovernmental coordination and maximizing public
involvement. As discussed previously, a Community Development District has a
statutory requirement to report information concerning District operations. Further,
because a District is a special purpose government, it must advertise its regularly
scheduled meetings, ensuring the opportunity for public comment. The proposed
District, if established, in my opinion, is consistent with and would further this goal.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Packet Page -582- 10
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
Policy 25(b)2. Ensure that every level of government has the appropriate
operational authority to implement the policy directives
established in the plan.
The fact that a District established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, must
not be inconsistent with any applicable portion of the State Comprehensive Plan, a
District is granted the. operational authority to implement policies of the Plan. The
establishment of the proposed District is consistent with Policy 25(b)2.
Policy 25(b)3. Establish effective monitoring, incentive, and enforcement
capabilities to see that the requirements established by
regulatory programs are met.
A District is not exempted from any applicable local, regional or state growth
management regulatory programs, thus the establishment of the proposed Hacienda
Lakes Community Development District is not inconsistent with this policy.
Policy 25 (b)8. Encourage the continual cooperation among communities,
which have a unique natural area, irrespective of political
boundaries, to bring the private and public sectors together for
establishing an orderly, environmentally, and economically
sound plan for future needs and growth.
The District is required to operate openly (in the sunshine) and with public notice,
encouraging public participation, and as stated previously, reporting of the District's
facilities and services status to the County government provides a mechanism for
cooperation between the general purpose and special purpose governmental
entities. The establishment of the proposed District is consistent with this policy.
39. Are there any other subjects within the State Comprehensive Plan which are
relevant?
Yes, Subject 17 is also Goal 17 of the State Comprehensive Plan, and mandates the
protection of the investments in public facilities to serve the public in a timely, orderly,
and efficient manner. This Goal would be directly implemented through the
establishment of the proposed District through the responsible provision of services
and facilities when needed to those property owners within the District. The
establishment of the District will be consistent with this subject and goal. Collier
County implements and funds its adopted Capital Improvement Element, and
Hacienda Lakes has coordinated community improvements with Collier County
government.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Packet Page -583- 11
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Policy 17(b)3. Allocate the costs of new public facilities on the basis of the
benefits received by the existing and future residents.
Facilities and services provided by the District are paid for through assessments and
user fees by those property owners who benefit from those facilities and services. In
my planning opinion, the proposed District is consistent with, and will implement,
Policy 17(b)3.
Policy 17(b)5. Encourage local government financial self - sufficiency in
providing public facilities.
The proposed District, if established, would be a special- purpose local government,
and would be self - sufficient in the provision of infrastructure, services and facilities.
The establishment of the proposed District would not be inconsistent with this
policy.
Policy 17(b)4. Create a partnership among state government, local
governments, and the private sector which would identify and
build needed public facilities and allocated the costs of such
facilities among the partners in proportion to the benefits
accruing to each of them.
The state legislature determined that a District is a legitimate alternative method of
paying for and managing community development. A District must be consistent
with the plans of the State and local governments. Establishment of the District,
consistent with this legislative intent, is consistent with Policy 17(b)4.
Policy 17(b)6. Identify and implement innovative but fiscally sound and cost
effective techniques for financing public facilities.
The special - purpose District will have limited powers to design, fund and construct
services and facilities necessary to accommodate the project's service demands. The
proposed District is consistent with this policy.
Policy 17 (b)7. Encourage the development, use, and coordination of capital
improvement plans by all levels of government.
The District is subject to the reporting provisions of Section 189.415, Florida
Statutes, which in paragraph (6) states, "For purposes of the preparation or revision
of local government comprehensive plans required pursuant to s. 163.3161, a district
public facilities report may be used and relied upon by the local general purpose
government or governments within which the special district is located."
This statutory provision is directed at fostering coordination between special
districts and general - purpose governments. The proposed District, if established,
will implement this policy, and is therefore consistent with the policy.
Packet Page -584- 12
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
40. Do you have an opinion, as someone with expertise in planning, as to whether
the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes CDD is inconsistent with any applicable
element or portion for the Collier County Comprehensive Plan?
Yes.
41. What is that opinion?
That the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes CDD is not inconsistent with any
applicable element or portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan.
42. What is the basis for this opinion?
The adopted Collier County Local Government Growth Management Plan is set
forth in the following Collier County Ordinances, as amended. This Plan is currently
in force and effective in Collier County.
Capital Improvement Element Ord. 2011 -43
Transportation Element Ord. 2008 -59
Public Facilities Element — Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element Ord. 2007 -09
Public Facilities Element — Potable Water Sub - Element Ord. 2009 -04
Housing Element Ord. 2007 -14
Recreation and Open Space Element Ord. 2008 -59
Conservation and Coastal Management Element Ord. 2010 -49
Future Land Use Element Ord. 2011 -40
Intergovernmental Coordination Element Ord. 2008 -55
Under the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, as amended,
the Plan consists of various elements, sub - elements and appendices. I reviewed each
Plan element with respect to the powers granted to a Community Development
District under Section 190, Florida Statutes. As a professional planner, I have
reviewed the Plan in order to determine whether there is any specific inconsistency
between the proposed Community Development District Plan and the Collier
County Growth Management Plan. Those goals, objectives and policies that are
relevant to the creation of the proposed Community Development District have
been evaluated.
The establishment of the Community Development District to provide the
governmental services for Hacienda Lakes complies fully with the goals, objectives
and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Packet Page -585- 13
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT - POTABLE WATER SUBELEMENT
Policy 1.2.6: Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special
districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or
other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water -Sewer District,
water service shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall
be conveyed when acceptable to the Collier County Water -Sewer District for
operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 04 -31, or its
latest revision, and District construction and operating policies.
Hacienda Lakes will provide potable water infrastructure to support the proposed
development within the District boundaries and will connect the system to Collier
County consistent with the Collier County Utilities Ordinance. The establishment of
the proposed District is consistent with this Policy.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Goal 1: Provide for the continual exchange of information and the use of any
intergovernmental coordination mechanisms with Broward, Dade,
Hendry, Lee, and Monroe Counties, Cities of Everglades and Naples,
Collier County School Board, Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council, and any other local, state, or federal agency or governmental
entity, and utility companies such as but not limited to Florida Power
and Light, Lee County Electric Cooperative, Sprint/United
Telephone, Immokalee Water and Sewer District, Pelican Bay Service
Division (MSTU), Florida Water Services, Florida Cities Water
Company, Media One, and Cablevision Industries, that may be
impacted by Collier County's land, road, or facility planning to
resolve differences and to achieve compatible and coordinated plans.
Objective 1.1: By the time mandated for the adoption of land development
regulations pursuant to Chapter 1633202, F.S., including any
amendments thereto, establish intergovernmental
communication and level of service coordination mechanisms
to be used by Collier County, Cities of Everglades and Naples,
adjacent counties, the Collier County School Board, the State,
and any other entity that provides a service but may not have
land use authority.
Policy 1.1.1: Collier County will continue to utilize existing coordination
mechanisms, e.g., interlocal planning agreements, joint
meetings and any other mechanism described in this element
which promotes consistent planning activities.
Hacienda Lakes has coordinated with and received necessary approvals from both
public and private sector agencies in the delivery of services, such as Collier County
Utilities, independent fire control districts, Collier County Department of
Transportation, and Florida Power and Light to insure the services are coordinated
and non - duplicative.
Packet Page -586- 14
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District will continue to coordinate plans
with the various governmental agencies as it develops. The establishment of the
proposed District is consistent with this goal and associated objective.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Objective 5 and
Policy 5.1: In order to provide sound planning, ensure compatibility of
land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land
Use Element. All rezoning must be consistent with this Growth
Management Plan.
Hacienda Lakes is a residential master planned community, which utilizes the
Planned Unit Development zoning district alternative to establish the development
program, and the establishment of the Community Development District to provide
governmental and infrastructure services. The project site is located in areas
designated as: Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict, and the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Fringe Subdistrict, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, and the
Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands as
depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map.
The intent of this District is set forth previously in this Report. This proposed
master planned project is consistent with this objective and policy, and has been
found consistent with the Growth Management Plan by the Collier County Board of
Commissioners.
The establishment of the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District, pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, is not inconsistent with the goals
objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Based upon the aforementioned findings, the creation and establishment of the
proposed District would not be inconsistent with any goals, policies, sections or
portions of the Plan, even if it were to exercise any and all of its statutory powers.
Further, the creation and establishment of the proposed District would not be
inconsistent with those parts of the Plan, which do not relate to the creation and
establishment of a District.
43. Does this conclude your testimony?
Yes.
Packet Page -587- 15
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
IN RE: PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE
HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AFFIDAVIT ADOPTION WRITTEN, PRE -FILED TESTIMONY
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
I, Emilio Robau, P.E. of RWA, Inc., a Florida corporation, being duly sworn, do hereby state for
my affidavit as follows:
1. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in this affidavit.
2. My name is Emilio Robau and I am an employee of RWA, Inc., a Florida
corporation.
3. The prepared, written, pre -filed testimony, submitted under my name to Collier
County relating to the establishment of the Hacienda Lakes Community Development
District, and attached hereto, is true and correct.
4. If I were asked the questions contained in the pre -filed testimony orally at the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District establishment hearing on
, 20_, my oral answers would be the same as the written answers
presented in my pre -filed testimony.
Packet Page -588-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
5. My pre -filed testimony generally addresses the nature of the services and facilities to
be provided by the proposed Hacienda Lakes Community Development District, the
truth and accuracy of the Petition to establish the proposed District, and compliance
with the factors to be considered in the establishment of a community development
district.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing and the facts alleged
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executive this 23 day of March , 204,
WORN O and SUBSCRIBE D
20�JZA C--
By
Emilio Robau, P.E.
before me by the Affiant, on this � of
•.. ANNA VICTORIA A
MY COMMISSION k EE 000221
-` EXPIRES: October 13, 2014
7 �?a SonM TWU Notxy pubk unde^"crers
Personally Known V
Type Identification produced
UW4.-
Notary Public State of Florida
a Iva 4gA
Typed Name of Notary Public
Packet Page -589- 2
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
TESTIMONY OF EMILIO J. ROBAU , P.E.
1. Please state your name and business address.
My name is Emilio J. Robau. I am licensed as Professional Engineer in the state of
Florida. My business address is 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200, Naples Florida,
34109.
2. By whom are you employed and in what capacity?
I am employed by RWA Inc. and am director of engineering and water resources
consulting for the firm.
3. And what is the nature of your firm's business?
The firm engages in providing design and consulting services for public and private
clients in the field of planning, surveying and general civil engineering infrastructure and
community design.
4. Please describe your experience and credentials, including your current
employment.
I have practiced civil engineering in Collier County and southwest Florida continuously
since 1986. 1 am currently employed by RWA, Inc. I was employed as a professional
engineer and project manager previously by Wilson Miller Barton Soll and Peek, Agnoli
Barber and Brundage Inc. and Professional Service Industries, Inc. I was a principal and
owner at RWA, Inc. from 1997 to 2007. After that period of time, I sold my interest and
became an employee of the organization. I now hold the position of Director of Water
Resources and Director of Engineering. My professional experiences include engineering
design and general consulting for developments of regional impact, residential and
mixed -use master planned communities, site development plans, public infrastructure
projects and regional surface water and flood control works. My professional experience
should demonstrate that I am professionally experienced and qualified to review the
petition for establishment of the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District.
5. Please provide your professional background, with degrees earned, major areas
of study, year of degree, and institutions attended.
My license is active and in good - standing with the Florida Board of Professional
Engineers. I hold a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering from the University
of Florida. The University of Florida provides for a diverse curriculum as part of the
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering program. Areas of study include; Mechanics,
Strength of Materials, Geotechnical Engineering, Structural Engineering,
Packet Page -590-
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Hydrodynamics, Hydraulics, Hydrology, Construction Means and Methods, Contracting,
and a variety of liberal arts and language courses.
Over the years of practice in Collier County I have become specialized in community
development and water resource projects. These projects often include complex
environmental permitting and general civil engineering design for potable water systems,
sanitary sewer collection systems, stormwater management and paving grading and
drainage facilities.
6. Do you hold any professional designations or certifications?
I hold a Professional Engineer Certification in Florida and North Carolina. I also hold a
records certificate with the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and
Surveying which certifies my education and professional experience and allows for fast
track licensure in all 50 states.
7. Are you a member of any professional associations?
Yes, I am a member of the National Society of Professional Engineers, The Florida
Engineering Society and Professional Engineers in Private Practice.
8. Prior to your current employment, by whom were you employed and in what
position?
I was employed as a professional engineer and project manager previously by Wilson
Miller Barton Soll and Peek, Agnoli Barber and Brundage Inc. and Professional Service
Industries, Inc.
9. Do you consider yourself an expert in civil engineering?
Civil Engineering has been my only career. My background in engineering and surveying
extends to my college work/study program where I began surveying in 1981. As a result,
my pre - professional and professional work experience in the general areas of
construction, civil engineering and surveying spans 29 years. As a result, I consider
myself and expert in civil engineering, community planning and design.
10. Please describe your experience with civil engineering relating to community
development districts ( "CDDs") and special districts?
I have assisted in the preparation of white papers and opinions of probable cost for
community development districts as an employee and owner of RWA. I have also
assisted in supporting the management activities for community development district
engineer as an employee of RWA. I have worked as a design engineer for communities
that ultimately established community development districts and I have worked with
community development district review procedures for community designs regulated by
the district.
Packet Page -591- 2
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
11. Do you consider yourself an expert in civil engineering, capable of rendering
expert opinions on CDDs, and specifically on infrastructure for CDD services?
Yes.
12. What has been you role with respect to the Petition to Establish ( "Petition ") The
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District ( "Hacienda Lakes CDD ")?
I am in responsible charge of preparing the opinions of probable cost and preliminary
infrastructure design associated with the development of the Hacienda Lakes CDD. I am
the author of the testimony reflected in this document.
13. Are you familiar with the Petition filed to establish the Hacienda Lakes CDD?
Yes
14. Have you reviewed the contents of the Petition?
Yes, I have reviewed the contents pertaining to the civil engineering and planning
elements of this petition.
15. Are there any changes or corrections to the Petition at this time?
None noted.
16. Are there any changes or corrections to any of the exhibits attached to the
Petition at this time?
None noted.
17. Are you generally familiar with the geographical areas, type, and scope of
development and the available services and facilities within the Hacienda Lakes
CDD?
Yes
18. Please provide us with a brief description of the Hacienda Lakes CDD
boundaries and location?
Hacienda Lakes is a 2,262 -acre multi -use Planned Unit Development in southern Collier
County, Florida. The proposed CDD development area encompasses 615.2 acres and
includes portions of Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Sections 11, 14, and 23.
Hacienda Lakes is bounded on the north by Willow Run Quarry, a commercial
excavation; on the east and south by undeveloped agricultural lands owned by the State
of Florida. Private individuals and entities own several of the parcels adjacent to the
Hacienda Lakes CDD on the south side of the CDD. The western CDD boundary is
Packet Page -592- 3
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
adjacent to the County Road 951 canal right of way and various developed and
undeveloped lands in private and corporate entity ownership including Collier Regional
Medical Center PUD, First Assembly Ministries PUD, and single - family lots. The
boundaries are shown on Exhibit 1 — Project Location Map.
19. Please describe Exhibit "1" (i.e., location map); Exhibit "2" sketch and metes
and bounds legal description of the boundaries of District:; and Exhibit 3a -3c (i.e.,
map of the proposed stormwater sewer interceptors and outfalls, map of proposed
water mains and force mains, and the map of the existing infrastructure) of the
Petition.
Exhibit 1 presents a generalized project location map depicting the location and extent of
the Community Development District and the major roadways and schematic
developments adjacent to the project. Exhibit 2 is a sketch and description of the
Community Development District in the Metes and Bounds format prepared by a Florida
registered land surveyor and mapper.
Exhibit 3a depicts the schematic master stormwater plan as permitted by the South
Florida Water Management District at the time of the formation of the Community
Development District. This schematic was used to develop the opinions of probable cost
for the paving grading and drainage and stormwater infrastructure.
Exhibit 3b is a schematic master plan of the sanitary sewer collection system. The
schematic plan is a preliminary design of the sanitary collection and transmission system.
This plan was used to develop the opinion of probable costs for the sanitary sewer
collection and transmission facilities.
Exhibit 3c depicts the schematic master plan for the potable water distribution system.
The schematic plan is a preliminary design of the potable and fire protection water
distribution system. This plan was used to develop the opinion of probable cost for the
potable and fire protection water distribution system.
20. Are the contents of the Petition and exhibits attached to it true and correct to the
best of your knowledge as of the date your prepared testimony is filed?
Yes
Let me ask you a few questions about certain opinions you may have based on your
experience with CDDs, civil engineering, real estate development, and the
development of lands within Hacienda Lakes CDD in particular.
21. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the proposed
Hacienda CDD is of sufficient size, sufficient compactness, and sufficient contiguity
to be developed as a functionally interrelated community?
Yes
Packet Page -593- 4
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
22. What is your opinion?
My opinion is that the Hacienda Lakes CDD boundary area as depicted in Exhibit 2 is of
sufficient compactness and contiguity to be developed as a functional interrelated
community. The design of the community promotes a mixed use character of interrelated
land uses that are intended to be used by residents of the community and also people who
reside elsewhere in the County.
23. What is the basis for your opinion?
As proposed, the Community Development District is approximately 615.2 acres in total
land area. This area is greater than the minimum threshold area for a Community
Development District. I find that the proposed district is of sufficient size to be
developable as one functional interrelated community.
The compactness of the development is demonstrated in the master plan. The approved
density, minimum lot sizes and land uses found in the approved zoning ordinance, Collier
County Ordinance 2011 -41 promote an interconnected development with a variety of
land uses that provide for residential occupation and associated land uses that support the
residential uses internally and provide for uses that are accessible to the residents of
Collier County. The development areas generally contiguous to one another and are as
compact as allowed by local development standards as modified by the zoning ordinance.
The conservation areas are contiguous to the development, and accessible from its roads
and access points. The development plan indicates that the DISTRICT is sufficiently
compact as a self contained multiple land use community as one functional interrelated
community.
The CDD is also sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated
community. The development plan indicates the CDD is entirely contiguous and
connected by district roads.
It is my opinion that the area of land within the district is sufficiently large, sufficiently
compact and sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated
community.
24. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether Hacienda Lakes
CDD is the best alternative available to provide community development services
and facilities to the area that will be served?
Yes
Packet Page -594- 5
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
25. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
There are four standard alternatives available to deliver the community development
services and facilities for the area. The following public and private mechanisms were
considered as alternatives to deliver community development services.
Public alternatives include:
1. Collier County (General - Purpose Government)
2. Municipal Special Business Unit (MSBU)/Municipal Special Taxing Unit
(MSTU)
Private Alternatives include:
3. The Private Developer
4. Homeowners Association (HOA)/Property Owners Association (POA)
Collier County (General - Purpose Government) is a non - chartered county, a
governmental subdivision of the State of Florida. As the local, general- purpose
government, .Collier County provides community services for most unincorporated areas
of the county. The community is located in the unincorporated area of the County. The
County maintains a growth management plan in order to plan for and regulate community
development throughout the County. The growth management plan aims to protect the
public interest and welfare by implementing specific objectives and policies to regulate
development and redevelopment. The growth management plan includes capital
improvement plans which are meant to anticipate future population growth throughout
the county and plan expenditures to improve community essential infrastructure systems
which serve areas with existing population and positive growth potential.
The Collier County Growth Management Plan neither provides a long -term strategy nor
budgets capital improvements for the development of Hacienda Lakes. The construction
of roadways, bridges, sidewalks, water management facilities and other infrastructure
directly associated with the development will cost tens of millions of dollars. The
residents of the community will be the primary users of the infrastructure internal to the
development. After construction, the infrastructure will incur annual maintenance costs as
well. At the time of construction, this project would cost the County millions more that
the sum of the annual ad valorem tax revenues generated by the property. The County
will not be able to recoup the construction and maintenance costs in a reasonable
timeframe which will require the County to divert funds from other budgets or procure
bonds. The County will not generally participate in private development enterprises and
depends on the private sector to fund or create funding mechanisms required to fund the
initial capital infrastructure costs. The County ultimately benefits from the increase in
Packet Page -595- 6
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
property value and associated taxes.
The taxable value of the land will increase when the developer sells the improved land,
and ad valorem taxes for the area will generate adequate revenue to support the services
with time. However, tax revenues collected in the area of the CDD will not match the
initial expenditure and debt service payments for years after the initial commitment.
Furthermore, it is my opinion that the burden to construct the capital improvements to
serve the CDD cannot fairly be placed on the general public because the development
will not immediately serve the entire County but instead will primarily serve the residents
of the community.
Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU)/Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) is a
funding mechanism created by local government to collect special taxes or special
assessments from property owners for real property located within a distinct boundary.
Funds generated by special assessments are used to support construction and maintenance
of infrastructure and services which directly benefit the properties subject to the tax or
assessment. MSBU/MSTUs may provide any or all of a long list of community services
including those proposed to be provided by the CDD.
Similar to local general .purpose government alternative, the MSBU/MSTU solution
relies on the payment property taxes, ad valorem or non -ad valorem, and assessments by
property owners to generate revenue to fund improvement and maintenance projects. In
contrast to general- purpose government funding, MSBU/MSTU raises funds from a
special assessment which is only collected on properties located within the boundary of
the special district. This practice addresses the "fairness" issue by collecting taxes or
assessments only from those properties which benefit from the expenditure of the funds
raised.
There are difficulties with the MSBU/MSTU funding alternative for the primary
infrastructure of the Hacienda Lakes community. The first difficulty is that the costs
occur early and construction would still need to be bonded by the County until the special
assessments equaled the project and debt service costs. MSTUs and ad valorem special
taxes are frequently criticized and perceived as a disincentive to the prospective home or
land buyer. Furthermore MSBU/MSTU funding alternatives place an additional burden
on County staff to manage and administrate the BSTU or MSBU district.
A third issue is the matter of non - payment of taxes. Evidence exists that non - payment of
property taxes for undeveloped lots is more prevalent in sub - divisions served by MSBUs
and MSTUs according to a 2003 report by the Florida Legislative Committee on
Intergovernmental Relations, named "Platted Lands," which references a study in Putnam
County, Florida. This report indicates that the County may actually bear a larger burden
for services in undeveloped subdivisions where infrastructure is funded by MSBU and
Packet Page -596- 7
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
MSTUs. It is my opinion that the creation of an MSBU/MSTU is not the best alternative
to provide services for the area of the CDD.
The Private Developer is one private funding alternative. The private developer bears
the cost of the initial construction of new infrastructure throughout the subdivision.
Additionally, the private developer pays impact fees for improvements to and
maintenance of existing public facilities that serve the development on a County wide
basis. Impact fees are charged on the basis of the new demand for services and
infrastructure due to the improvement of the subdivision and are generally used for
infrastructure network improvements.
In my opinion impact fees are an insufficient means to support the CDD for two reasons.
Impact fees are not a timely mechanism to support the community services because they
are due upon an incremental build out of individual units. Construction and maintenance
costs are generated well before the subdivision is built -out in an incremental manner and
the incremental impact fees do not provide the necessary cash flow to build the
development with an economy of scale. Secondly, impact fees apply to existing County
infrastructure and services and expanded services to meet the demands for growth for the
backbone County infrastructure that is generally shared by all residents outside and inside
of the development, impact fees do not fully account for the costs of services for new
infrastructure associated with the development site specific infrastructure needs. There
remains, after the payment of impact fees, a deficit of capital needed for the construction
of the improvements that will primarily serve the residents of the community. The private
developer can finance these improvements the cost of which is, in turn, passed on to the
end user or purchaser of the residential units, or the other land uses, within the
development. However the private developer is more likely to acquire more competitive
interest rates in the bond market through the issuance of a Community Development
District bond for the infrastructure and as a result may be able to pass the more favorable
rates for the cost of money to the end user. For these reasons, it is my opinion that the
private developer is not the best alternative to provide services for the area of the CDD.
Creation of one, or more, Homeowners Association (HOA) / Property Owners
Association (POA) is a second private funding alternative to creation of the CDD.
HOA/POAs are private corporations created to provide for governance and management
of subdivision services and infrastructure. HOA/POAs collect dues or fees from private
property owners and provide directly or contract services within their subdivision.
The challenge for HOA/POAs is that property owners may be unable or unwilling to pay
association fees and assessments since they generally do not exist without the
development infrastructure in place. HOA/POAs are responsible for providing services to
the entire community, regardless of whether or not individual lots are developed.
Furthermore, financial hardship and bankruptcy on the part of the lot owner can protect
Packet Page -597- 8
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
the owner from creditors including the HOA/POA. This phenomenon renders the
HOA/POAs unable to collect fees for services which it provides. HOA/POAs can have a
very difficult time collecting dues and fees from homeowners, especially in times of
economic recession. In my opinion, creation HOA/POA is not the best alternative to
provide services to the area of the CDD.
As discussed above, several alternative mechanisms for providing community
development services were considered prior to the preparation of the petition for the
creation of the DISTRICT. After reviewing all of the alternatives, it is my opinion that
the creation of the DISTRICT is the best alternative for delivering community
development services to the area to be served.
26. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the services and
facilities to be provided by Hacienda Lakes CDD will be compatible with the uses
and existing local and regional facilities and services?
Yes
27. What is your opinion and the basis for it?
The proposed infrastructure will be constructed in compliance with the Collier County
Land Development Code and the Mixed Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Master
Plan Set as approved in Ordinance 201141. Bridges, roadways, drainage and other
improvements located in public right -of -ways will be subject to permitting and standards
set forth by the public entity responsible for permitting and regulating the use of said
right -of -ways.
All CDD projects will be platted or within platted areas. permitted and reviewed by state
and local governments having jurisdiction over the works and development. The facilities
will be extended from existing facilities as generally depicted on the Exhibit 3 schematic
master plans in accordance with the capacity to serve and County specifications. Based on
this information, it is my opinion that the CDD will provide community development
services and facilities which are compatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and
regional development services and facilities.
28. Based on your experience, do you have an opinion as to whether the area to be
included within Hacienda Lakes CDD is amenable to being served by a separate
special district government?
Yes
29. What is the basis for your opinion?
The petition indicates that a large majority of the lands to be served by the district are
Packet Page -598- 9
9/11/2012 Item 9.6.
owned or controlled by the private developer who is making the petition. The petition
also indicates that the owners of other lands to be served by the district are amenable to
separate special district government.
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners has approved Ordinance 2011 -41,
which rezones the lands to be served by the district. The approval of the rezoning and the
master plan indicates that the County is willing to cooperate with the development of the
district. The County will review and approve the petition to acknowledge that it is
amenable to the separate special district government.
Based on the content of the petition, the zoning approval, and the findings related to the
size, compactness and contiguousness of the area, it is my opinion that the area that will
be served by the district is amenable to separate special district government.
30. Turning now to the state and local comprehensive plan criteria of Section
190.005(1)(e)2., do you have an opinion as to whether the establishment of The
Hacienda Lakes CDD is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the
State Comprehensive Plan?
Yes
31. What is your opinion?
The Hacienda Lakes CDD is consistent with the state and local comprehensive plans.
32. What is the basis of your opinion?
The Collier County Planning Commission, Board of County Commissioners and
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, as recommended by their staff, has
reviewed and approved the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, Development of
Regional Impact and the Growth Management Plan Amendment. These land use
documents did not prohibit or conflict with the establishment of a Community
Development District.
33. What is Subject 15 and why is it relevant?
Subject 15 is also Goal 15, and is applicable because it directs development to areas
having, or programmed to have funded land and water resources, and necessary
infrastructure capacity to serve growth in an environmentally responsible manner.
This testimony associated with subject 15 has been prepared in collaboration with
the project planner.
The Hacienda Lakes Development Order (Resolution No. 2011 -227, adopted
December 13, 2011, which expanded the Collier County Water Sewer District), is in
an area of Collier County that has available access to regional water and sewer
Packet Page -599- 10
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
services, and roadway networks to serve a project of this scale. The District is
located in the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe
Subdistrict, and the Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential
Fringe Subdistrict, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, and the
Agricultural/Rufal Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands, as
depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map from the Future Land Use
Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The development has
been found to meet all applicable goals, objectives and policies related to natural
resources. The creation of the District is consistent with this goal of the State Plan.
The Hacienda Lakes CDD is within the Collier County Water and Sewer District,
and will meet the provisions of the Collier County Concurrency Management
System.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 15(b)1. Promote state programs, investments, and development and
redevelopment activities, which encourage efficient
development and occur in areas which will have the capacity to
service new population and commerce.
Establishment of the District is consistent with this policy. Chapter 190, F.S.,
establishes that a District purpose is to provide necessary capital infrastructure to
service projected growth without overburdening other governments and taxpayers.
All necessary on -site infrastructure will be provided by the Developer or Community
Development District, which will be coordinated with Collier County Government.
All development will be consistent with the Collier County Capital Improvement
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
Policy 15(b)2. Develop a system of incentives and disincentives, which
encourage separation of urban and rural land uses while
protecting water supplies, resource development, and fish and
wildlife habitats.
A District is a form of local government, which is required by law to provide service
capacity in areas designated for urban services, and to provide such services in an
environmentally sensitive manner. The Establishment of the proposed District is
consistent with policy 15(b)2 of the State Plan. The Hacienda Lakes Community is
located within an area designated for urban levels of development on the Collier
County Future Land Use Map.
Policy 15(b)3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through
the encouragement of an attractive and functional mix of
living, working, shopping, and recreational activities.
Establishment of the District is consistent with this Policy. Through the creation of
the District, Hacienda Lakes will be developed as a master planned residential
Packet Page -600- 11
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
community with on -site recreational and personal services amenities designed to
serve the residents of the District within the designated recreational components of
the project. Onsite open spaces are linked to nearby preservation areas providing for
contiguous passive recreational opportunities.
34. What is Subject 20 and why is it relevant?
Subject 20 is also Goal 20, and requires governments to efficiently and effectively
provide public services to meet the demand of the public. The testimony associated with
subject 20 has been prepared in collaboration with the project planner. Chapter 190.002
finds that an independent district can be a solution to the state's planning,
management, and financing needs by providing timely, efficient, effective and
economic means of service delivery. The proposed District will provide services in
an economical and efficient manner to residents of the District and is consistent
with Goal 20.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 20(b)2. Allow the creation of independent special taxing districts,
which have uniform general law standards and procedures and
do not overburden other governments and their taxpayers
while preventing the proliferation of independent special
taxing districts, which do not meet these standards.
This policy directly addresses why a Community Development District is a beneficial
method of funding community development services. A Community Development
District provides the infrastructure and community services through the sale of
various types of bonds, for which the obligation to repay the bonds is borne by only
those who directly receive the benefits provided by the Community Development
District. The general taxpayer has no obligation to pay for services within the
District.
The Community Development District must be established according to the
standards specified in the Florida Statutes and must be consistent with local
government plans. The proliferation of independent districts is restricted by the
various factors required to establish a Community Development District. The
proposed Community Development District in my professional planning opinion is
consistent with Policy 20(b)2.
Policy 20(b)5. Eliminate needless duplication of, and promote cooperation
in, governmental activities between, among, and within state,
regional, county, city, and other governmental units.
Packet Page -601- 12
9/11/2012 Item 9.B.
A District is required under the Florida Statutes to prepare reports and public
records with respect to its facilities and operations which are made available to
owners within the Community Development District, as well as prospective
purchasers. These records are also filed with the County as public records and may
be utilized by the local government. This cooperative requirement of sharing
information as well as the requirement to be consistent with the State and local
government plans furthers the proposed Community Development District's
consistency with Policy 20(b)5.
Policy 20(b)9. Encourage greater efficiency and economy at all levels of
government through adoption and implementation of effective
records management, information management, and
evaluation procedures.
Florida Statutes, Chapter 190, requires that Community Development Districts
perform extensive record keeping and management, and they are subject to the
Florida Sunshine Law. In my professional planning opinion, these requirements of
the Community Development District fulfill the requirements of Policy 20(b)9, and
the establishment of the District is consistent with this policy.
35. What is Subject 25 and why is it relevant?
Subject 25 is also Goal 25, and mandates the integration of systematic planning for the
purposes of improving intergovernmental coordination and maximizing public
involvement. The testimony associated with subject 25 was prepared in collaboration
with the project planner. A Community Development District has a statutory
requirement to report information concerning District operations. Further, because
a District is a special purpose government, it must advertise its regularly scheduled
meetings, ensuring the opportunity for public comment. The proposed District, if
established, in my opinion, is consistent with and would further this goal.
The following policies are worthy of note with regard to the formation of my
opinions related to the proposed district and its consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 25(b)2. Ensure that every level of government has the appropriate
operational authority to implement the policy directives
established in the plan.
A District established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, must not be
inconsistent with any applicable portion of the State Comprehensive Plan; a District
is granted the operational authority to implement policies of the Plan. The
establishment of the proposed District is consistent with Policy 25(b)2.
Packet Page -602- 13
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
Policy 25(b)3. Establish effective monitoring, incentive, and enforcement
capabilities to see that the requirements established by
regulatory programs are met.
A District is not exempted from any applicable local, regional or state growth
management regulatory programs, thus the establishment of the proposed Hacienda
Lakes Community Development District is consistent with this policy.
Policy 25(b)8. Encourage the continual cooperation among communities,
which have a unique natural area, irrespective of political
boundaries, to bring the private and public sectors together for
establishing an orderly, environmentally, and economically
sound plan for future needs and growth.
The District is required to operate openly and with public notice, encouraging public
participation. Reporting requirements associated with the District's facilities and
services status to the County government provides a mechanism for cooperation
between the general purpose and special purpose governmental entities.
36. Are there any other subjects within the State Comprehensive Plan which are
relevant?
IM
37. Do you have an opinion, as someone with expertise in planning, as to whether
the establishment of Hacienda Lakes CDD is inconsistent with any applicable
element or portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan?
Yes
38. What is your opinion?
The Collier County Planning Commission, Board of County Commissioners and
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, as recommended by their staff, has
reviewed and approved the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development, Development of
Regional Impact and the Growth Management Plan Amendment. These land use
documents did not prohibit or conflict with the establishment of a Community
Development District.
39. Does this conclude your testimony?
Yes
Packet Page -603- 14
i
i
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
NAPLES DAILY NEWS K Wednesday,,iugust8,2012 a 9A
PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NU17Ch
NOTICE OF PUBLIC .HEARING.
NOTICE TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board'I hereby gives notice to the citizens
of Collier County that apublic hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures
of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, commencing at 9AQa.m., "in the Commission Board Room, Third Floor,
Collier County Government Center, 329g.Tamiami Trail; East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012.
The subject of the Public Hearing is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Wilton Land Company,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company for the establishment of a Community Development District (COD) form
of special purpose local government to be, known as the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
(CDD) by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2),'Florida Statutes. The district govemment
would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida. The pro-
posed district covers approximately 615.23 acres of land. The site is Fast of C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard),
located in Sections 11, 13, 14, 23 & 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
PROJECr LOCAWON MAP A community development district is a form of special
purpose government used to provide infrastructure
` - -- subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
i of Florida and 'Collier County governing any existing
12 or future lawful use and development of the land de-
+, scribed above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic
/ community faaitles, systems, and services which may
be required of any such development consistent with
e ;
principles, of c on currency, comprehensive planning,
and development, permitting. .
On March 23 2012, George P Bauer, Manager, Wilton
Land Company, •LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Com-
pany and Marco Island Group, LLC. a Florida Limited
//, Liability Company, officially submitted and filed its Pet!
Lion for an Ordinance to Establish the Hacienda Lakes
ez • . _� . g z+ Community Development District, aloha With the appli
cation- processing fee of $15,000.00, for review by the
u; County.
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will
comply with Section 190.005; Florida .Statutes, in
conducting this Public )fearing:.. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition,
as submitted by Wilton Land Company, LLC, to the six
factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and determine wfiether Collier County will establish the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District by adoption of an ordinance.:
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences
of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens (modest or very inalil; Collier County
and its citizens (modest or very small), the present property owners; and the future property owners,
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the require-
ments of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is
available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its daournantation; at the Boards
Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamtami Trail E., Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112.
Copies of the petition, which containsthe legal, description of the real property to be serviced _bythe proposed
district, are also on file at the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section of Land Development Services
Department, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida., All interested, persons; are invited to
attend"
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any
matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, -and for such.purpose
he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the;proceedings is made, which record includes-the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
August 08, 2012, August 15, 2012, and August 22, 2012
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
George P. Bauer, Manager
Wilton Land Company, LLC, A Florida Limited Company
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN '
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: MarthaVergara, Depatydierk (Seat}
h10 240192928 August 8_3 5 22 2012
Packet Page -604-
1
i
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
N A P L E S D A I LY N E W S (c Wednesday, August 15, 2012 u 17A -
PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE :. PUBLIC NOTICE.
.NOTICE OF` PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE i
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board"] hereby glyes notice to the citizens
of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted In accordance with the requirements and procedures
of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, -Third Floor,
Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiaml Trall, East, Naples, Florida, on.Tuesday, September 11, 2012....:
The subject of the Public Hearing is consideration by the Board of a'petition.filed by Wilton Land Company,.
LLC, a Florida limited liability company for the establishment of a Community Development District (CDR) form.
of special purpose local, government to be known as the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
(ODD) by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes. The district government
would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows:'
The proposed District is located entirely within the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida The pro-
posed district covers approximately 615.2:t acres of land. The site is East of C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard),
located in Sections 11, 13, 14, 23 & 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
PRO.rPCr LO CATION MAP A community development district is a form of special
DT401 „o purpose government used to provide infrastructure
subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing
z or future lawful use and development of the land de
scribed above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic
community facilities, systems, and services which may
be required of any such development consistent with
principles of coneurrency, comprehensive planning,
and development permitting:
G`! On March 23, 2012, George P. Bauer, Manager, Wilton
Land Company, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Com-
pany and Marco Island Group, LLC a Florida Limited
Liability Company, officially submitted and filed its Peti-
tion for an Ordinance to Establish the Hacienda Lakes
- 2+ Community Development District, along with the appli-
cation-processing fee of $15,000.00, for review by the
SnBa4PKMRDID I County. ..
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will
comply with Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, in
26 2, conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition,
-- as submitted by Wilton Land Company, LLC, to the six
factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will establish the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District by adoption of an ordinance_ '
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences
of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens (modest or very smalo; Collier County
and its citizens (modest or very small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the require-
ments of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes,' including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is
available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Boards
Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail E., Suite.401, Naples, Florida 34112.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed
district, are also on file at the Collier Courty Comprehensive Planning Section of land Development Services
Department, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to
attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any
matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need'a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose
he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony, .
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
August 08, 2012, August 15, 2012, and August 22, 2012
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
George P. Bauer, Manager
Wilton Land Company, LLC, A Florida Limited Company
. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E: $ROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk -(Seal)
No. 240192928 August 8. 15. 22, 2012
Packet Page -605 -
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
NAPLES DAILY NEWS K Wednesday, August 22,2012 u bA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board ") hereby gives notice to the citizens
of Collier County that a public hearing shalt be conducted In accordance with the requirements and procedures
of Section 190.005; Florida Statutes, commencing at 9:00 am., in the Commission Board Room, Third Floor,
Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012.
The subject of the Public Hearing is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Wilton Land Company,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company for the establishment of a Community Development District (CDD) form
of special purpose local government to be known as the Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
(ODD) by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes. The district government
would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, The pro-
posed district covers approximately 615.2m acres of land. The site is East of C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard),
located In Sections 11, 13, 14, 23 & 24,. Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
coo P�,orwesono
i
„Arnss,wc�
AMtMOGK nOAO �
W
SABN. PALM ROAD
'
- j
I
A community development district is a form of special
purpose government used,to. provide infrastructure
subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State
of Florida and Collier County governing any existing
or future lawful use and development of the land de-
scribed above, and specifically governing the planning,
implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic .
community facilities, systems, and services which may
be required of any such development consistent with
principles of concurrency, comprehensive 'planning,
and development permitting.
On March 23, 2012, George R Bauer, Manager, Wilton
Land Company, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Com-
pany and Marco Island Group, LLC a Florida Limited
Liability Company, officially submitted and filed its Peti-
tion for. an Ordinance to Establish the Hacienda Lakes
Community Development District, along with the. appii-
cation- processing fee of $15,000.00, for review by the
:`County .
The Board's consideration of the CDD Petition will
comply with Section 190.005, Florida Statutes;' in
conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this
hearing .is to consider the relationship of the petition,
as submitted by Wilton' Land Company, LLC, to the six
factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will establish the
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District by adoption of an ordinance.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences
of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County
and its citizens (modest or very small); the present property owners; and the future property owners.
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the require-
ments of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of Its computations and determinations, is
available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Boards
Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiaml Trail E., Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112,
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed
district, are also on file at the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section of Land Development Services
Department, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to
attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any
matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose
he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
August 08, 2012, August 15, 2012, and August 22, 2012
Hacienda Lakes Community Development District
George R Bauer, Manager
Wilton Land Company, LLC, A Florida Limited Company
BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA -
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clark - (Seal)
No. 2 401 9 2928 Auaust'8, 15, 22. 2012
Packet Page -606-
4
9/11/2012 Item 9.13.
NAPLES DAILY NEWS (( Wednesday, August 29,2012 (( 19A
,IC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
ORDtNANCE NO. 12 -_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING.
AND NAMING THE HACIENDA LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUND -
/TRIES OF THE DISTRICT NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE DISTRICT'S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; PROVIDING
STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND COMMITMENTS GQVERNING THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONSENT TO SPECIAL
POWERS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board's hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier
County that a public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005,
Florida Statutes, commencing at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, Third Floor, Collier County Government
Center, 3299 Tamiaml Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, September t1, 2012. The subject of the Public Hearing
is consideration by the Board of a petition filed by Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company for tha'
establishment of a Community Development District (CDD) form of special purpose local government to be known as the
Hacienda Lakes CDD'by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes. The district govern
merit would serve an area of land in Collier County generally described as follows:
The proposed District is located entirely within the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida. The proposed district
covers approximately 615.2± acres of land. The site is East of C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard), located in Sections 11,13, 14,
23 & 24, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, as depicted below.
vROJECr LOCAVONArav A community development district is a form of special purpose
government used to provide infrastructure subject to the regula-
tory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County
governing any existing or future tawtul use and development of
the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, .
Implementation, maintenance, and financing of basic community
-- j "% � Nm.eo
-,
facilities, systems, and services which may be required of any such
/ ! development consiste
P nt with principles of concurrency, comprehen-
sive planning, and development permitting.
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the pro-
posed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest
or very small); the present property owners; and the future property owners. .
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of
Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review,
along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at Boards Minutes and Records Department,
3299 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed District, are
also on file at the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section of Land Development Services Department, located at
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter
considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is to be based..
August 29, 2012 - Hacienda Lakes, Community Development District - George P. Bauer, Manager
Wilton Land Company, LLC, A Florida Limited Company
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT I- BROCK, CLERK
By. Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(Seal)
No 240192929 Awust 29, 2012
Packet Page -607-
/' ii
On March 23, 2012, George P. Bauer, Manager, Wilton Land Com-
pany, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company and Marco Island
Group, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, officially submit -
i` ted and filed its Petition for an Ordinan�.to Establish the Hacienda
the
"
.i/ji
Lakes Community Development District, along with application-
of for by the County;
71
$15,000.00, review
1
I ! The Board's consideration of the COD Petition will comply with Sec-
tion 190.005, Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing.
The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the
77
petition, as submitted by Wilton Land Company, LL.C, to the six fat-
„
tors fisted in Section 190.005(1j(e), Florida'Statutes, and determine
s
whether Collier County will establish the Hacienda Lakes Commu-
_,..,—
nay Development District by adoption of an ordinance
According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the pro-
posed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens (modest or very small); Collier County and its citizens (modest
or very small); the present property owners; and the future property owners. .
A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of
Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review,
along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at Boards Minutes and Records Department,
3299 Tamiami Trail E., Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112.
Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed District, are
also on file at the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section of Land Development Services Department, located at
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter
considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is to be based..
August 29, 2012 - Hacienda Lakes, Community Development District - George P. Bauer, Manager
Wilton Land Company, LLC, A Florida Limited Company
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS- COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT I- BROCK, CLERK
By. Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(Seal)
No 240192929 Awust 29, 2012
Packet Page -607-