Agenda 12/10/2013 Item #17D 12/10/2013 17.D,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance
Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the
comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by
amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the
herein described real property from an Agricultural (A) zoning district within Wellfield Risk
Management Special Treatment Overlay zones W-3 and W-4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) to a
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district within Wellfield Risk Management
Special Treatment Overlay zones W-3 and W-4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) for a project to be known as
the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 25 residential dwelling
units and up to 38 boat slips on property located on the Golden Gate canal south of Bear's Paw in
Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 10.75± Acres;
and by providing an effective date. (Petition number RZ-PL20120002095)
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and
ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure
that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS: Special note: "Exhibit F List of Developer Commitments" section IV.
has been revised to clarify that the Developer, its successors and/or assigns (which may include
the home owners association described in Exhibit F, Paragraph V) shall be responsible for
maintenance of improvements located within that portion of the Golden Gate Canal within the
project boundary, as depicted on Exhibit C. The revision is accepted by Staff and the CCPC
Chairperson as it meets the intent of the maintenance standard. Please see Attachment:
"Original PUD Language" and "Current PUD Language."
This petition seeks to rezone 10.75- acres of vacant. undeveloped land zoned Rural Agricultural
(A) to Resiaential Planned Unit Development(RPUD). A portion of the site includes submerged
lands located in the Golden Gate Canal. The land area above the mean high water line (MHWL)
of the canal is 8.71± acres. The PUD proposes the development of no more than 25 single-
family residential units with a density of 2.9 dwelling units per acre. (The Growth Managemem
Plan allows up to 3 units per acre on the subject site.) The buildings will have a zoned height of
30 feet and an actual height of 35 feet. Ingress/egress will be from Golden Gate Parkway via an
access road easement that will also serve the Gordon River Greenway Park.
The site is also located in a Special Treatment Overlay for well fields (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4),
which requires land uses such as residential development that reduce the potential for
groundwater contamination.
Packet Page-2550-
12/10/2013 17.D.
The Master Plan(See Attachment) depicts the areas of residential and amenity area development,
water management, and traffic/pedestrian circulation. The Master Plan also shows that 5.27 acres
will be residential area, 0.19 acres will be an amenity area, 2.05 acres are tidally submerged
lands, 1.83 acres will be right-of-way and 1.41 acres are "other area" landward of the MHWL
(mean high water line).
Notes on the Master Plan state that there are a maximum number of 25 residential units. The
notes also indicate the petitioner's intention to meet the required preservation area off-site. In
addition, the open space requirement of 60 percent will not be met and the proposed alternative
is to provide 50 percent open space. Please see the Deviation section of the Staff Report for
further information.
Landscape buffering requirements are met by a 10-foot wide Type D right-of-way Landscape
Buffer adjacent to the access road easement. There is no landscape buffer is required between
the golf course and the proposed residences, as the golf course is considered to act as a buffer.
Along the canal a deviation is requested from the landscape buffer that mitigates the impact of
the proposed residences from the existing residences across the canal. The requirement is for a
10-foot wide Type A Landscape Buffer with trees 30 feet on center; the deviation request is to
allow for trees spaced an average of 45 feet on center with the same number of trees otherwise
required by the 30-foot spacing. Please see the Deviation section of the Staff Report for further
information.
The petitioner, per the Planning Commission's direction, is pursuing the option to mitigate the
preserve off-site and has offered $103,255.00 to Conservation Collier for off-site preservation
mitigation. It should be noted that the Land Development Code provides two options for off-site
mitigation, but the CCPC wanted the off-site mitigation to be provided within the local Gordon
River area and requested that the donation to Conservation Collier be utilized by the project.
The payment is less than the amount called for in the valuation formula set forth under Section
3.05.07.H.1.F.iii.a of the Land Development Code. That amount is $168,493.56, based on 125%
of the average cost land in the urban area purchased through the Conservation Collier program.
The enclosed letter from the petitioner was provided to The Conservation Collier Land
Acquisition Advisory Committee (CCLACC). which met on November 18. 2013, in a public
meeting and reviewed the offer. They voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of
County Commissioners to accept the donation and to earmark it for acquisition of the Collier
Development Parcel, a 7.5-acre parcel on the south end of the Gordon River Greenway Park.
FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier
County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of
development. However, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be
developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities
(excluding potable water and wastewater services, which are to be provided by the City of
Naples).
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
Packet Page-2551-
12/10/2013 17.D.
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order
to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include
building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please
note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP)IMPACT: Future Land Use Element(FLUE):
Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the Future Land Use
Element. A more detailed description of the GMP consistency is contained in the Staff Report.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The
CCPC heard petition RZ-PL20120002095, The Landings at Bear's Paw Residential Planned Unit
Development(RPUD) on October 17, 2013, and by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended to forward this
petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the following stipulations which have been incorporated into the PUD document:
1. Amend the Access Easement to provide that:
a. The Access Easement will continue to permit access to Parks and Recreation.
b. Maintenance of the Access Easement will be by the Developer or the community
homeowner's association and not Collier County.
c. An entry gate shall be permitted, so long as it is not public and not publically
maintained.
2. Deviation number 4 side-yard setback for single-family docks shall be revised from 0-
feet to 7.5-feet.
3. All boat slips shall be limited to residents of the community.
4. The boat slips constructed adjacent to single-fami tots shall be parallel to the shorelin:
and shall not be perpendicular.
5. Remove references to number of[building] stories on the Development Standards Table.
6. Add Footnote Number 1 to the accessory front yard setback. (Re: footnote 1 relates to
the 23-foot setback when there is a front entry garage. and this revision is intended to
apply the footnote to detached garages.)
7. Delete Footnote Number 2 in the accessory side yard setback and revise the accessory
side yard setback standards so as to mirror the principal side yard setbacks.
8. Change Section V of the Developer Commitments to include maintenance of
improvements within the Access Easement.
Packet Page -2552-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Astok
9. The following shall be included in the Executive Summary that is prepared by Staff: The
offsite mitigation will be valued at a monetary contribution of$103,255.00, which is also
intended to mitigate the open space reduction. The Planning Commission recommends
that these funds be earmarked for the acquisition of Folio No. 20760080007 (commonly
known as the"CDC Parcel").
10. Provide an Enhanced Landscape Plan as referenced in the Petitioner's justification for
Deviation# 5.
There have been no letters of objection received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the
Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from an Agricultural (A) Zoning
District within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-3 and W-4
(ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District
within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-3 and W-4 (ST/W-3
and ST/W-4) for a project to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD. The burden falls
upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth
below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider
denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or
unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or
more of the listed criteria below.
Criteria for RPUD Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land. surrounding areas, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements.
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintainer
at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only
after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies
of the Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on
design, and buffering and screening requirements.
Packet Page-2553-
12/10/2013 17.0.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve
the development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and
private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use
pattern?
11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
t'pes of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
Packet Page-2554-
12/10/2013 17.D.
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege
to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in
accordance with existing zoning? (a"core"question...)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range
of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on
the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of
service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code
ch.106, art.II], as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that
the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by
the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality. and requires
an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for RZ-
PL20120002095, The Landings at Bear's Paw Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
subject to the CCPC stipulations.
Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA
Planning&Zoning
Attachments: 1) Staff Report
2) RPUD Ordinance
3) Location Map
Packet Page -2555-
12/10/2013 17.D.
4) Master Plan
5) Application/Environmental Documents/TIS at:
http://www.col1 iergov.net/ftp/AgendaDec 1 0 1 3/LandingsBear'sPaw.pdf
Packet Page-2556-
12/10/2013 17.D.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.17.D.
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land
Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the
unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or
maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an
Agricultural (A) zoning district within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay
zones W-3 and W-4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
zoning district within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones W-3 and W-
4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) for a project to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to allow
construction of a maximum of 25 residential dwelling units and up to 38 boat slips on property
located on the Golden Gate canal south of Bear's Paw in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range
25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 10.75±Acres; and by providing an effective date.
(Petition number RZ-PL20120002095)
Meeting Date: 12/10/2013
Prepared By
Name: GundlachNancy
Title:Planner, Principal,Comprehensive PianninE_-
11/12/2013 2:51:18 PM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, GMD P&R
Date: 11/13/2013 2:05:45 PM
Name: BellowsRay
Title: Manager-Planning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 11/14/2013 10:58:21 AM
Name: BosiMichael
Packet Page-2557-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Title: Manager-Planning,Comprehensive Planning
Date: 11/14/2013 11:22:45 AM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date: 11/15/2013 8:55:58 AM
Name: AshtonHeidi
Title: Section Chief/Land Use-Transportation,County Attor
Date: 11/20/2013 1 1:19:31 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 11/20/2013 4:55:24 PM
Name: FinnEd
Title: Senior Budget Analyst, OMB
Date: 11/25/2013 6:05:47 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 11/27/2013 10:41:42 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 11/30/2013 12:01:28 PM
Packet Page-2558-
AGENDA _12/10/2013 17.D.
Co er County
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION
HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2013
SUBJECT: PETITION RZ-PL20120002095, THE LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW
RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Headwaters Development Limited John M. Passidomo and William J. Dempsey
Liability Limited Partnership, LLLP Cheffy Passidomo, P.A.
9130 Galleria Court, Suite 312 821 5th Avenue South
Naples, Florida 34109 Naples, Florida 34102
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone
from an Agricultural (A) zoning district within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment
Overlay zones W-3 and W-4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) to a Residential Planned Unit Development
(RPUD) zoning district within Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones W-3
and W-4 (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4) for a project to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to
allow construction of a maximum of 25 residential dwelling unit:; and up to 38 boat slips on the
subject property.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The 10.75± acre subject property is located on the Golden Gate canal south of Bear's Paw and south
of Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), approximately %2 mile east of Goodlette-Frank Road (C.R.
851). in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County. Florida (See Location Map
on following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This petition seeks to rezone 10.75± acres of vacant, undeveloped land zoned Rural Agricultural (A)
to Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD). A portion of the site includes submerged
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD, RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 1 of 21
Packet Page -2559-
IIiI12/10/2013 17.D.i - - — 1
. L _
IM 7 g 4
. s .R . 1
.., ,, M 1
° ., i k g i.
\ J !3
_ ._ ° 0•
\ � it
ci\I . -1-I.H I H_H.H.H.�.�. , {I z
< M...-MAIM •
s 9 x< : son YM P1NM
- - • . WA ,: : nn ....r Z
1 0
El N
Y
.2u.-,,,,,,, iii owl mom
i E # . I 5 i i pp rn
yy l I •rt �- N
a c° i 1 r r i 4 1 ttO '� E® �� X N
33 - 12 py$
J
a
z'
atrieaaur *�I I ' _1iE E! o
. i 5 * G n purl UOOM131 ��ni @' v
X111 ° g
g x
0111 its I� �� s ��.
F5q ■ 'otl NOLSONIM g -- I yp� I
ffi z E ]n ■, Q ppp r c.
il 0
\ = fig~ Q �� E - 1\ �E c sI (�
1 r owa°Nmno-tuoear V II —1 C
IS
■ II I
�maa aaalsAVe
- Le, o i /♦ ' m
tiMA MO ' ' Qi
'I n
{MU HNVarauawoo°
I yS n Il9.Y'y f tg 0 hilitli
IL4SM llVtll RMWtll � ' ,7� J
V
EMI r
GULF OF MEXICO
Packet Page -2560-
... ...,. , ..
r_-AntE.)1 ri ",.... 1..,1 7- 3, 12/10/2013 17.D.
. ,
-=----='---7-r r /=-,-■-=
— —TI-7-77'•: ; —
. ..
•
gII-411.4iItT,' AITNI*
7
s-
'..,
I tn
\ I ii r,
o;to-1',
n ''''•7-.,-E1 .N. tI,
, d
, ,I ' , -: c;.--,..
'....... li
. •. 41, L..
, .
I-II Z
i 1 :1 i \ \ , Sn
1 ..7 2=
! I I ■ 14-I O
i i
1 3 E..... ; ;. .! , z.
:7_ o
0 0
: • , ; \I 1,.- , .
_
\ o ,.>7 O
_...., • P , :`-,'---' EI:.,ei E', ...,,-,
,‘: s=--.a 5.-.. . t , gp,
1 ,1 ,
s 6 5 's< 00 0 z-
1 : ,
. cc cr`-'' . _, z.rz
: :I , -.
.
, 0 Cz !r'F-' `-' '°- C 2 z
. . ,
■
\ :,,,,,-2'-..,‘,. 1.1- 0,c-., :..-._.,It•Io 05 ..6 Id ty 1.,,, 0:I,I.±) ; ET,
I I I '4. I. L6)P,' Li' <CW' 71r 0! p'
,1 r
\ \ \ ',.d,,,- 2 E■--.."`c,1-, 0 0 0 ,,, .-
7■5°,,,g. III t,-
. R ..?..- i 2,L., .
s,),,,, ,0 . n n < 11,-,,, ,,.. 0
,
551 triX<O= CO 0 11.,_ On._ :f1 'If ,T)
, \ s,
,
vii 11 , ■ s. i.sis.,
■ 35 rt L'
,
. ,
CO i I 1 \ '■ \ s .., , -.=Es. 0
. ,
r...1,9
-NI :
II...'''' •• L ' "!4: II-'‘III-1,---\ ,
1 i ''''
7
:',.---: I I I
E ...,1-.
'I • ri ezi s-i. C-'••
,
o.•
C- \
I L6 ...A \ .., 0.,-. LT `•<' Evi.',.I7E,,,
.,:
,..-
c-; f6- , Lf.ET.' t;iff, •L., ,i ‘, .„, , 9`4'ilL" zt2f.L...'iin
. . 1 .c,.-:,, 1 2.4— \s \ b, 'a.t,tt,.., \ 8,....,H : LI!F..'11. i:-
.-. I=II'=.a- ,LI 2 '-' 0.
<,--.:Z-2_ ,.:
. . o z \'t, %, \ ..F.,-- g ootito,
F5 3`,!..' f5
2„.._ LL, , 0 _,I..., 5.'7 g:a '6 r. 3.,
\ 0.., ..i,-;„_ \ ce
EiC'"?' --:
.,..73,- ,.,-,
.!:-LI,I, o
E.E F., :., fCI?',- 12 tn.. \ F-C-'OI
I.J°C,i
Fi E Ci ! I ' Ii'r.9-,I-I ° , , 0 y,,..-'
,t <I. - - '-' C!,7 IOI1 FI3 _,C,
(11
I.- a z 0 ,_,_
t,..17 ....,, ;-\ Ec..1.., \ '. sq,\ a.6. <, .7,
. '
Lc'0.i— I,' I ' 1,I•'(C.'I' ' ,r (.., ....-•
''\.,\
, \ \ •,,., 1,.,0 ,
,:,
2 E 1
!--2-_,
cr,
1 s dtr=
.,„, 7 r 1
, -.2, sr, ,L--,'••,._
.,r-- r
r . I
\%,,,..‘ •\.,.
. F. : s\i\,.,.
'\\ c 4 •.,..1,7,. 'Cr ',1-1 t'N' I I I
', I -., .LIC'''-i • ,-.' -'. ,k .\\ .II-2-6 -12.\ ‘[..,',,...,-- ..7',C',c ----th , , •
'
t =- == 'L
1 ,...,,, , , ..,
... \\\ ',. - -,--.-
,..
ili 1
=
,.._
Pilg I 1
:rg 6_\ Ikri •
Ilf.7‘. \ 1111 i
t- II
, , ...
-'•-
..,. .
---
..--.. - ...f
1 N ,, ,:..N, .
'[1' 1` \\ V F' \I hIIII ,,
., \
"-C- I.A' - \ ..."AI ...
= ,\ \ ,
: : •
I „..._
1 ;
1 1
1 i ,
zi•
4,40.44.1/4„
I
,
I'; “I' ,-..5...,....-
D.-i6...:::=L,3-g EC-I ,:. E.:2',1:;
'''' ..,.%:-,.:9.i..,,:7
I i ' '-.::i7,;1L." rE-e,:iiI,LLT=I
!e2-'-;P,'e*,F2, w o]
L?,1 7 7
MATCH LINE 6 Q-1 •• LJ
...,.....c.o0c/c 0■1019,,I.,5,611111.0....1.413a1(a 703.1.4.16,210.0.4...was.a.m.mw mcom:-.1f.V.Ve.YU,14111¢2 urea...
Packet Page-2561-
�XHJBI °'�°` (2 OF 3) 12/10/2013 17.D.
gzziN Az
iiiiiin
�O o I
1 N
�> �� 4 �a
t G
1! .v v �q fl
Z e id
c� ■ U J W ow
0
W i a 0E';
w to U c o J I-LAI
O
• Q cj '' d aos '7
6 Z P. wi /- wvta w
�' _—_ = °sc m: �cn WO
ON t/ o� 1a / W aQ ti N
Z 2gg ,(3 C
°i , N W zn�W �x w
Z J 5 n
q,,• FL „ Ho row 2
i Wt m W
to Q/ Z of
Q
=o d Z m - U
O } gi W
P ° ( r Ua
U s o
LU co
ow
,,, u C , Q
a
62 8
w �oz=
! — Z=000a
eye°
3
o o m .w
,.�a : 'a rw - mo O w C
65
OYO �Owk-_"7 03 w
Z 5<'( --c - O,
w�,
Q U wZ WZIwW
mNw L4>
;› C W,-�p ZL02 VQZ W w
NtZwr E,-,... OpO c4- 2 wRN� ? C',Ow aoD <
WQ m c, - SW W ` a oQmOW w Y Q -JN �-O, „, Qcoz atiwQ C0= a=N 7rc = Z ¢ N , -'N -� Ui j- id 0 'wC OC. - C . Lw Cu Ow ”zo zU00�C,,, tiL'J ao ''' 6e= ° E,zw,r Swc Z QuE OQ :H WV1Q CCD Yy. W N N Z f C _U, r U,,C� O g _ o WC F- 4
I
il 11
C ` vno, <7- ' Q .6,, c,0- S ,-�O r I N If N ` i! Ca 0 C o r nc- -,,3- m I O ,,60'- o wJ ` "Nw ., Q 41U Op Ca - WC L L Z Q c,°=,_-'O o Jw a I
a >L` _ cNm.. we ^o wa▪Nt4 O E,Q _c ,-- w -
Ir
1 I I I i = 7`=- o -` _ m R 5 _i.
I( 11 Ili ii:
1 O UG C= CJNL O GC- O J_ J J g w
p ,,
t° O r � � i �v • Q iDE. o
2 m W C,,,LAJ . .. oHK , onC Lm 2w `.,.,. _ i I
W - Wf W� C C W WL WC. _ 1%w ' � i
cJ i c. u v �. f _ G U F— ' ;-,- - - , r I
n— c c<xz c�i o oTV r<oi ii
w . s W LI LL O .' !.._'=,:'-'n< w O Q V O f
w
W^ L c Q w L± S S w V 0 1 0 L e =4,7° W`,T- X,:-
C_ L.)-'L,--''''''E O 2 - n-:.mG ¢- Q G ..: m K OLL:,^p
j S m � g._ _) YQ'7u ' - Qf YFW c °U,.nW 42 Lt I
L ¢ i
Q v� a v v�wc, ✓'„,,,, Nam c NNL v1aa c uC �t1
C L O ��
Li_ --z-Q tQf ', m. V 1 x' ra �OV U4 ^eC ,- .7, '-'
C it
m a wOw t''-'W: ,`, wC1" .I- pQ. . d ,�i
Z. G 4 Qw m V ? Z g- uww L---- z Q'-:.=-,7,,, W U W�
U !--7:"9 ==i QN1�! hz2 5.,aw =Q r Mme w ‹ i� .NU5UVi
wQ C-P4'0 QGC GW2'e, L` 2C ? M i1�L l'C7, tE. ,, = I G
U1 i <,-! '-',1 .-1 ‹I < < 1 I
1
..001.:. . _ . 1 143 ,. b .76,07 Kda05 E-Ewr,a.MY,Waitli UMW,.
Packet Page -2562-
EXHIBIT "C' (3 OF 3) 12/10/2013 17.D.
§A sa
g43Z=
O o w—
md� da
o= 53 �„ W
`"f :6
$ V6'
I s3IaVn .1,
. . I
m
H I r...3 icwiwa5' I
N V V Z
aa4 as o . ° s r
S oom�N H
z5 "3 i ° E 0 0Z
II �° L J J
°z 1 I r i= W 1-5
<z ao < 1 `a N 0 vl z W�
riff 8. I , A i w -1-I .
g,”! Em I 4 _IO m ., x
°�. I 1 °
act Z v1om z
_- I 4 a ON 11JaW a..
o N I w a % F- W=W m ¢ a LL
`� I z co wQ
QQ°�u iM
I_ i > o 5 ; 0WW 2°2 Qt
r aaY °z= 6
1 R 0~¢ g¢< Nv
L J J(n
I >
LU in H F r1-3J W
Z C W >r
■ w 0 V, C
a o
UeZ
ozo 4 zwa J BI-
-Zw- NZU OJ Jt-Q
o�C�smaN Q W W
p 4 c
i wa w zay
sz� ¢O z
cw�� t Z W O i
mn O>I-
o
Jo W 3 111= ,.✓ w O o „:W 1 I X Owp ^ o m I �° -/ ZLL p `sa.
WN N I 'm m� 0 0 CC z =Cg";
4 4 I _ <Z F CI -z
w Q K U
r a i \ Fdl � zzL
z w I Q =
g o2 o Fa
(El
ELL �E ° r 531a tl < RI?..11 1-U
=z
dU dQi OW� ° f‘I W ,
LL }2m g a
' � W I O>r
li zI F'..° LL
. :' = W
_
LL
, 1 LU yZ s€':
-
y
ae
:<3a _ ..OD
om I-.
Y F
_wZU2� 0
ZZQ#. 0 Z4
-myi - SRN
N
w Ca _¢ I
r
`g it V 1
�1
° C o�QI
y .c5,'•
C c I j >-I I-'
m go.
°� &c, z ( w1
LT,'„;.. 2 & 1 I I _, O 1 Lg
I r JIB z
S — 2 w d LL ° V
r 5 b 1 5318vn < U w z m
w
1 ' ° 51 �i 9
L 1 J r Z \ o
f / z a 6 tn 0 30
K 2
c F,_ I ow 1
Z U j .5 -
m W
e1N =Uwd ^O 2 : 1
� z°
o I 1 ma� I
we•.0 nsrtu mw,nym-nwVrfMwu.aa v I•Sr\wes•Vfss,•VeYmem.•11.ns sere t-e.•\w•e•An'nV W euem•••
•
Packet Page-2563-
12/10/2013 17.D.
lands located in the Golden Gate Canal. The land area above the mean high water line (MHWL) of
the canal is 8.71± acres. The PUD proposes the development of no more than 25 single-family
residential units with a density of 2.9 dwelling units per acre. (The Growth Management Plan allows
up to 3 units per acre on the subject site.) The buildings are a maximum of two stories and will have
a zoned height of 30 feet and an actual height of 35 feet. Ingress/egress will be from Golden Gate
Parkway via an access road easement that will also serve the Gordon River Greenway Park.
The site is also located in a Special Treatment Overlay for well fields (ST/W-3 and ST/W-4), which
requires land uses such as residential development that reduce the potential for groundwater
contamination.
The Master Plan provided on the previous pages of this Staff Report depicts the areas of residential
and amenity area development, water management, and traffic/pedestrian circulation. The Master
Plan also shows that 5.27 acres will be residential area, 0.19 acres will be an amenity area, 2.05 acres
are tidally submerged lands, 1.83 acres will be right-of-way and 1.41 acres are"other area" landward
of the MHWL(mean high water line).
Notes on the Master Plan state that there are a maximum number of 25 residential units. The notes
also indicate the petitioner's intention to meet the required preservation area off-site. In addition,the
open space requirement of 60 percent will not be met and the proposed alternative is to provide 50
percent open space. (For more information, please refer to the Deviations section of this Staff
Report.)
Landscape buffering requirements are met by a 10-foot wide Type D right-of-way Landscape Buffer
adjacent to the access road easement. In addition, where the private road serving the proposed
development abuts the existing golf course, a 10-foot wide Type D right-of-way Landscape Buffer
has been provided. No landscape buffer is required between the golf course and the proposed
residences, as the golf course is considered to act as a buffer. Along the canal a deviation is
requested from the landscape buffer that mitigates the impact of the proposed residences from the
existing residences across the canal. The requirement is for a 10-foot wide Type A Landscape
Buffer with trees 30 feet on center; the deviation request is to allow for trees spaced an average of 4
feet on center. (For more information, please refer to the Deviations section of this Staff Report.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Golf course and then residential dwellings, with a City of Naples zoning designation of
Bear's Paw Country Club PD (Planned Development), at 6 dwelling units per acre
South and East: Golden Gate Canal, a 160-foot wide drainage easement containing an
approximately 120-foot wide canal, and then Manatee Point Condo single family residences with a
zoning designation of RSF-4 (Residential Single-family), at 4 dwelling units per acre
West: a 60-foot wide access easement and then a preserve area within the Gordon River Greenway
Park, with a zoning designation of P (Public Use)
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 6 of 21
Packet Page -2564-
12/10/2013 17.D.
— 8p rM�T
Subject Site -
:cuP. ' "A
older, _. :. 'D+Qty' .WWa0425, .:.. ° ,;,�t ' -. Ci" S2ft
AERIAL PHOTO
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated
area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict;. This designation is intended to
accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses. including parks. recreational
facilities and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC). The subiect
property is further within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) Overlay, as identified on the
Countywide Future Land Use Map.
Review of the Density Rating System yields the site eligible for 3 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), as
shown below:
Base Density 4 DU/acre
Coastal High Hazard Area -1 DU/acre
Total Eligible Density 3 DU/acre (x 8.713 acres =26.14 DU's total)
The applicant seeks to develop 2.9 single family dwelling units per acre, or a total of 25 dwelling
units per the application re-submittal request.
4
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 7of21
Packet Page-2565-
12/10/2013 17.D.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires that new developments be compatible with the surrounding land uses per
the Land Development Code (LDC). Please see Rezone and PUD findings contained in this Staff
Report.
Policy 7.1
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating
intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [There are no collector or
arterial roads fronting the site. However, the Master Concept Plan does show an access
connection to the west of the project within the proposed Gordon River Greenway Park (not a part
of this proposed P U.D.) which leads to Golden Gate Parkway, an arterial road to the north of the
project.]
Policy 7.2
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.
[The proposed Master Concept Plan depicts an internal roadway located between two (2)
residential tracts that loops around a proposed water management area on the west side of the
project, and connects to the proposed access road located within the proposed Gordon River
Greenway Park.]
Policy 7.3
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use
type. [The proposed project contains one internal roadway, which provides for only one access
point west of and into the project from the proposed Gordon River Greenway Park access road
There are no other local streets or interconnection points to connect to. Connection to adjoining
Bear's Paw to the north of the project is not feasible due to the fully developed golf course. The
Golden Gate Canal separates the project from the residential Manatee Point Condos to the east
and south of the project, therefore connection is not,feasible.]
Policy 7.4
The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of
densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Twenty —
five (25) single family dwelling units are being proposed within the project. According to a
conversation between staff, the agent and the Bears Paw HOA president, there will be pedestrian,
interconnection to the adjacent Bear's Paw community. With the requested deviation, a sidewall:
will be provided on one side of the internal street. Preserve areas and open space must be provided
per the LDC subject to the deviations described herein. The size and shape of the site limits the
ability to provide Civic facilities.]
Transportation Element:
Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement(TIS) and has
determined that this project can be found consistent with policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of
the Growth Management Plan. The project impacts can be accommodated on the adjacent roadway
network without need for any additional mitigation.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 8 of 21
Packet Page-2566-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element:
Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element(CCME).
Based on the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent
with the Future Land Use Element(FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan(GMP).
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5.,
Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD
Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report
(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's
recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the
BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation
relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development
Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses:
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff reviewed this petition. The petitioner has
requested the option to relocate the required onsite preserve offsite in accordance with LDC section
3.05.07.H.1.f.; staff has found this property meets the criteria for off-site vegetation retention. The
off-site vegetation retention shall be based on the preserve requirement, which is 25 percent (or 0.74
acres) of the existing 2.97 acres of on-site native vegetation.
There are gopher tortoises present on the subject site that mostly inhabit the spoil berm area. The
owner will be obtaining permits from Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to
relocate the tortoises to an approved off-site gopher tortoise relocation bank.
Transportation Review: Transportation Department staff has reviewed this petition and has found
that there is less than a 1 percent impact on the roadway network. Golden Gate Parkway is within an
acceptable LOS (Level of Service) along the first link and there are no impacts beyond the first link.
Utility Review: The City of Naples Utilities Department staff has reviewed the petition and has
stated that this project is located within the City of Naples potable water and waste water service
areas. In addition, staff has reviewed the petition and has confirmed that the existence of potable
water, reclaimed water and waste water mains within the public right-of-way or utility easement are
available for new connections to the property. Allocation of additional utility capacity at the city water
and sewer plants will be assured as the site development plans and permit applications have been
submitted, reviewed and approved by the City of Naples Utilities Department.
Historic Preservation Review: The Historic Archeological Preservation Board recommended
approval of the Historical Survey waiver request with the condition that a certified archaeologist will
be onsite during all excavations to monitor for the presence of historical and/or archaeological
artifacts or resources. The petitioner has agreed and this commitment is included in PUD Exhibit
"F" "Developer Commitments."
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 9 of 21
Packet Page -2567-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Emergency Management Review: The Emergency Management staff has reviewed the petition and
has no comments.
Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) District Review: CCPS staff has reviewed the petition and
has stated that there is sufficient capacity within the School CSA (Concurrency Service Areas). At
the time of site plan or plat, the development will be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is
capacity and that the levels of service standards are not exceeded. At that time, the most current
student enrollment will be used and the capacity within adjacent CSR's will be evaluated if
necessary. This analysis should not be considered a reservation of capacity or a determination of
concurrency.
Zoning and Land Development Review: As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, aerial photograph,
and the surrounding zoning discussion, the subject site will be separated from the existing single
family residences to the southeast by an approximately 120-foot wide canal. To the north, the
subject site is separated from the single-family portion of the residential development at Bear's Paw
by an approximately 300-foot wide golf course area. To the west of the subject site is an access
easement and then a preserve area within the Gordon River Greenway Park.
According to conversations with the agent, approximately 14-16 residential dwellings may be
constructed along the waterfront property. The PLTD indicates that up to 28 boat slips are proposed
along the Residential Tract waterfront area. A maximum of 10 boat slips for the non-waterfront lots
are proposed for the multi-slip docking facility located in the Amenity Area. There will be a total of
up to 38 boat dock slips, and they will be for the exclusive use of the Landings at Bear's Paw
residents.
The proposed homes are a maximum of 2-stories and have a side yard setback of 5 feet and a
minimum separation of 10 feet between structures and front and rear setbacks of 20 feet.
Analysis of the surrounding neighborhood reveals that the proposed development setbacks are less
than that of the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the development intensity of the subject
property is greater than that of the surrounding neighborhood. Bear's Paw has front. side and rear
yard setbacks of 35 fee-. 15 fee- and 30 feet. The single-family neighborhood across the canal has
front, side and rear yard setbacks of 25 feet, 10 feet, and 25 feet. The subiect property has front, side
• and rear yard setbacks of 20 feet. 5 feet, and 20 feet, which are less than the neighboring properties.
Approximately 14 to 16 waterfront home: at 10 feet apart are proposed along approximately 1,000
lineal feet of waterfront, directly across from 9 existing homes on the canal. The proposed
maximum of 38 boat slips contrasts with 5 existing docks located across the canal. The minimum
required Type A landscape buffer will mitigate for the waterfront development oy providing some
softening of the buildings. A landscape buffer deviation is proposed to allow for waterfront views
from the proposed residences. (Deviation # 8 seeks to reduce the tree plantings from 30 feet on
center to an average of 45 feet on center.) Due to the compact nature of the development, there is
also a proposed reduction in open space. (Deviation # 5 seeks a reduction in open space from the
required 60 percent to 50 percent.)
The Landings at Bears Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 10 of 21
Packet Page -2568-
12/10/2013 17.D.
For further discussion of the Deviations, see the Deviation section of the Staff Report. Alook
REZONE FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed PUD amendment is
consistent with all applicable elements of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth
Management Plan(GMP).
2. The existing land use pattern.
As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the
zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as
residential and park lands. There is residential zoning to the north, south and east. To the west is a
passive park. The land uses proposed in this PUD petition should not create incompatibility issues.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The subject parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to
adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its
consistency with the FLUE of the GMP.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the
property proposed for change.
The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3 above.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The growth and development trends, changing market conditions, specifically the development of
the site with residences, and the development of the surrounding area, support the proposed PUD.
This site is located within an area of development with a mixture of residential and park uses. The
proposed PUD rezoning is appropriate, as limited in the PUD document and the PUD Master Plan
based on its compatibility with adjacent land uses.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 11 of 21
Packet Page -2569-
12/10/2013 17.D.
The Manatee Point waterfront neighborhood located across the canal will be most impacted by the
proposed development. As previously stated, approximately 14 to 16 homes may be constructed
along the waterfront property along with up to 28 boat slips. In addition, up to 10 boat slips are
proposed for the multi-slip docking facility, for a total of up to 38 boat dock slips.
However, the proposed change should not adversely influence living conditions at Bear's Paw
because the existing Bear's Paw residences are buffered by the golf course and mature landscaping
located within the Bear's Paw community.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with the applicable
policies of the Traffic Element of the GMP and the project was found consistent with those policies.
Additionally,the transportation commitments are contained in Exhibit "F" of the PUD document.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to
the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Staff is of the opinion this PUD amendment will not adversely impact property values However,
zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by marker
value.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Property to the south and east and north of the subject site are already developed. The basic premise
underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound.
application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision
process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to
improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should
not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 12 of 21
Packet Page -2570-
12/10/2013 17.D.
The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as Amok
contrasted with the public welfare.
Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property can be developed within existing zoning.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is
not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition
was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review
other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would
be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these
residential sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth it the LDC regardin: Adequate
Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the
GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has
concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD, RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 13 of 21
Packet Page -2571-
12/10/2013 17.D.
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning
Commission shall make fmdings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following
criteria." (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font):
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
The nearby area is developed or is approved for development of a similar nature. The petitioner will
be required to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other
utilities. In addition, the commitments included in the PUD exhibit adequately address the impacts
from the proposed development.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain
platting and/or site development plan approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate
stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be
provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP.
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff
is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
While the proposed waterfront development is more intense than the neighborhood across the canal,
the proposed lanascaping should aid in making the development compatible. In addition, the
proposed residential development is compatible with the surrounding golf course and Gordon River
Greenway Park.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
While the open space set aside for this project is less than the minimum requirement of the LDC, the
subject development, as previously stated, is surrounded by open space: a golf course, a passive
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 14 of 21
Packet Page -2572-
12/10/2013 17.D.
greenway park and a canal. Every residence in subject community will have a view of either the Apek
waterfront or of the golf course, increasing the sense of open space. Furthermore, according to
conversations with the agent and with the Bear's Paw Home Owner's president, the subject
development will have access to the neighboring Bear's Paw golf course and amenities. Staff is of
the opinion that the open space provided is adequate.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this
time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation
Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other
applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
If "ability" implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system, potable water
supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, then the subject
property has the ability to support expansion based upon the commitments made by the petitioner
and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development
approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The petitioner is seeking 8 deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and
intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A). This criterion requires
an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD
depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning
district. Staff believes that the 8 deviations proposed can be supported, fording that, in compliance
with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived
and will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LD
Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviations are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive
examination of the deviations.
Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking 8 deviations from general LDC requirements and
has provided justification in support of the deviations. Staff has analyzed the deviation requests and
provides the analysis and recommendations below:
Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Street System Requirements," which states
that dead-end streets are prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to allow the internal dead-
end street to terminate in a "T" junction vehicular turnaround, as generally depicted on the
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 15 of 21
Packet Page-2573-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Conceptual Master Plan. Final location and dimensions of the "T"junction shall be determined at
the time of site development plan approval, and shall meet local fire district standards.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the unique
triangular shape of the project site makes accommodation of a cul-de-sac at the narrow corner of the
project site unfeasible. The proposed T-junction provides full vehicular turnaround, does not pose a
risk to public health, safety, and welfare, and has been approved by County staff for use by
emergency vehicles.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, Street System Requirements, and Appendix
B, Typical Street Sections and Right of Way Design Standards, which requires a 60-foot wide local
road, to allow a 50-foot wide local road in accordance with the internal right-of-way cross section
attached under Exhibit"C."
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the project
size, low density, and relatively small number of residential dwelling units renders the full 60-feet of
roadway width unnecessary, and the lack of public through-traffic on the dead-end private roadway
(and the absence of any other identifiable risk to public health, safety, and welfare) supports the
modest reduction in the proposed street width.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community'. and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the aeviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation # 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02A.2., Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway
Requirements, which requires sidewalks on both sides of a right-of-way terminating in a cul-de-sac
where there are more than 15 units fronting on said right-of-way, to allow for a sidewalk along one
side of the right-of-way. including the western terminus of the "T"junction described in Deviation
# 1, above.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the
project size and relatively low number of residential units renders the LDC requirement for
sidewalks on both sides of the internal roadway unnecessary, and one sidewalk is sufficient when
considering that the internal roadway:
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 16 of 21
Packet Page-2574-
12/10/2013 17.D.
1. Dead-ends within the project and does not connect as a through-street to adjacent lands.
2. Does not permit public pedestrian access.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation # 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities," which requires dock
facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water
frontage, to allow a 0-foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities
located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the
location of the project adjacent to the dead-end Golden Gate Canal and North of the fixed bridges at
the intersection of the Gordon River and US-41 serves to limit the size of boats that will use the
single-family residential docking facilities. In addition, there are relatively few docking facilities
lying between the project boundary and the Golden Gate Canal weir near Airport Road, which
results in a low volume of boat traffic passing by the project and the docks. The subject docks have
been conceptually designed to provide for mooring of boats horizontally with the shoreline, thereby
reducing the projection of docks and boats into the Golden Gate Canal, and boat sizes will be limited
by virtue of the community covenants, conditions, and restrictions. The approximately 120 foot
width of the Golden Gate Canal will readily accommodate the proposed dock facilities and preserve
navigability. The LDC setback requirements for the subject docks are accordingly not necessary and
fulfill no public purpose.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval fording that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community and LDC Section 10.02.1 3 B.5.h.. the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is ':justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation # 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1.. "Open Space Requirements," which
requires that PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and accessory uses to
devote at least 60 percent of the gross area to usable open space, to allow at least 50 percent of the
gross Project area to be devoted to usable open space.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the unique
triangular shape of the parcel limits the available onsite open space to 50%, even though the 2.9 unit
per acre density is well below the maximum permitted density. The site, however, has significant
usable open space available for the use of residents in the form of the immediately adjacent Gordon
River Greenway park, and the Bear's Paw golf course and club facilities immediately to the North.
The project will include a direct connection to the Bear's Paw golf course for pedestrian and golf
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 17 of 21
Packet Page-2575-
12/10/2013 17.D.
cart use, and residents of the project will be required to acquire memberships to the Bear's Paw
Country Club. As a practical matter, the project residents will accordingly have direct use and
enjoyment of the vast open space areas within the Bear's Paw community. Additionally, the modest
10% reduction in open space will be mitigated visually by the Alternative Type A Buffer described
in Deviation# 8, below, and by an enhanced internal landscape plan.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.b., "Fences and Walls,"which permits walls
at a maximum height of 6 feet in the rear and side yards of designated residential components of
PUDs, to allow walls at a maximum height of 8 feet in the non-waterfront rear and side yards of the
residential lots.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the
increased wall heights are desired to provide additional privacy for residents given the project
location immediately adjacent to the Gordon River Greenway Park and the anticipated public
pedestrian traffic associate with the park. The walls will not have an adverse visual impact on
adjacent residential and/or commercial uses as they will be located at the project entry (which faces
only the park).
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation # ` seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 B.l.b.. "Development Standards for Sign
within Residential Districts," which requires signs within residential PUDs to be located no closer
than 10 feet from the property line or from the edge of the roadway, paved surface, or back of
curb, as applicable, to allow Project entry signage to be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from
the property line.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the project
entry signage will be mounted on the wall facing the Gordon River Greenway Park, which wall will
be located approximately 5 feet from the project boundary and the 60-foot wide Access Easement.
The wall and signage will effectively meet the LDC setback from the paved surface within the
Access Easement because the roadway paved surface will be approximately 10 feet narrower than
the Access Easement's 60-foot width.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 18 of 21
Packet Page-2576-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends Amok
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
Deviation # 8 seeks relief from LDC Section LDC Section 4.06.02 C.1., "Alternate A: Landscape
Buffer," which requires a ten-foot-wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on
center, to allow a modified Alternate A Landscape Buffer with trees spaced an average of 45 feet on
center for that portion of the Project adjacent to the Golden Gate Canal. The equivalent number of
trees otherwise required by the 30-foot spacing shall be provided within the Alternative A Landscape
Buffer located on the Residential Tract along the Golden Gate Canal.
Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that the Type
A Buffer along the waterway will block scenic views of the Golden Gate Canal from the project
residences, and Developer's proposed Modified Type A Buffer will preserve view corridors while
serving as the functional equivalent of the Type A Buffer(and while providing the same number of
trees as otherwise required by the Type A Buffer). The proposed alternative landscape buffer will
provide buffering to the Manatee Point residences, which are located across the Golden Gate
Canal.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and
welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The agentiapplicam duly noticed and held the required NIM on July 23, 2013. For further
information.. please see Attachment E. "Neighborhood Information Meeting Notes."
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The Counts Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition RZ-PL20120002095, revised
on October 1, 2013.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission
forward Petition RZ-PL20120002095 to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 19 of 21
Packet Page -2577-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Attachments:
Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance
Attachment B: Neighborhood Information Notes
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 20 of 21
Packet Page -2578-
12/10/2013 17.D.
PREPARED BY:
JAI.At AAk# ALA by 2,0 Xl5
NANCY tip t _CH,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
GROWT r A GEMENT DIVISION
REVIEWED BY:
7- 2.5 - i.
RAYMI 'D V. BELLOWS, ZONING VNAGER DATE
GROWT MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
. ‘ „--,m," -----2 13
MCK'CAS.ALANGUD. ,,ADMINISTRATOR DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
The Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD,RZ-PL20120002095
October 2,2013
Page 21 of 21
Packet Page -2579-
12/10/2013 17.D.
ORDINANCE NO. 13-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY
AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A)
ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT
SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3
AND ST/W-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK
MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND
W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE
LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW RPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF
A MAXIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND UP TO
38 BOAT SLIPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE GOLDEN GATE
CANAL SOUTH OF BEAR'S PAW IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49
SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CONSISTING OF 10.75 ± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. (PETITION RZ-PL20120002095)
WHEREAS, John Passidomo, Esquire and William Dempsey, Esquire of Cheffy
Passidomo, P.A., representing Headwaters Development Limited Liability Limited Partnership
LLLP, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the
herein described property: and
WHEREAS, the Special Treatment zones ST/W-3 and ST/W-4 are not changed by this
rezone.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 35,
Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from an Agricultural (A)
zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a project
to be known as the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 25
residential dwelling units and up to 38 boat slips in accordance with Exhibits "A" through "G",
Landings at Bear's Paw1RZ-PL20120002095 1 of 2
Rev. 1 0/28/13
Packet Page -2580-
12/10/2013 17.D.
attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate atlas map or maps as pow
described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code,
is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this day of , 2013.
ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: By:
Deputy Clerk GEORGIA A. HILLER, ESQUIRE
Chairwoman
Approved as to form and legality:
Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Managing Assistant County attorney
Attachments: Exhibit A— Permitted Uses
Exhibit B— Development Standards
Exhibit C— Master Plan (3 pages)
Exhibit D— Legal Description
Exhibit E— Requested Deviations from LDC.
Exhibit F — Developer Commitments
Exhibit G — Sidewalk Exhibit
Exhibit H— Landscape Exhibit
CP\12-CPS-01199\9
Landings at Bear's Paw\RZ-PL20120002095 2 of 2
Rev. 10/28/13
Packet Page -2581-
12/10/2013 17.D.
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DOCUMENT
FOR
THE LANDINGS AT BEARS PAW
Date of Submittal: October 24. 2013
Prepared by: Cheffy Passidomo, P.A.
Packet Page-2582-
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT A
PERMITTED USES
No building, structure, or part thereof shall be erected or used within the RPUD, nor shall
any portion of the land within the RPUD be used, other than for the following permitted uses
and a maximum of 25 residential dwelling units:
a. Residential Tract:
i. Permitted Principal Uses:
1. Single family detached dwelling units;
2. Single family attached duplex dwelling units;
3. Single family zero lot line dwelling units;
4. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of principal uses. as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals or Hearing Examiner by the process set forth in the
Collier County Land Development Code ("LDC").
ii. Permitted Accessory Uses:
1. Accessory uses customarily associated with residential uses,
including but not limited to private recreational single-family boat
docks, mooring pilings, boat lifts/davits, swimming pools, spas,
and screen enclosures to serve residents and their guests;
2. Recreational facilities such as clubhouses, observation decks,
parks, playgrounds, pedestrian walkways. and bicycle paths to
serve residents and their guests:
3. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
list of permitted accessor} uses. as determined h:c.. the Boarc o`
Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examine- by the process set tort: it
the Collier County Land Development Code(`'LDC"t.
b. Amenity Area:
i. Permitted Uses:
1. A golf cart path. and uses and structures customarily associated
with waterfront residential amenity areas, including but not limited
to swimming pools, spas, parking. private recreational single
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 1 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095 1
October 24,2013
Packet Page -2583-
MIIIMI■-I
12/10/2013 17.D.
family boat docks, mooring pilings, boat lifts/davits, picnic areas,
and kayak launches to serve residents and their guests;and
2. Any other use or structure which is comparable in nature with the
foregoing list of uses and structures, as determined by the Board of
Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner by the process set forth in
the Collier County Land Development Code.
c. Golden Gate Canal (as to the Northern 1/2 of the Golden Gate Canal abutting
the project):
i. Permitted Uses: private recreational single-family boat docks, mooring
pilings, boat lifts/davits, and kayak launches to serve residents and their
guests. All docks are reserved for the exclusive use of the owners of
dwelling units within the RPUD property. No more than ten (10) boat
slips may be constructed adjacent to the Amenity Area, no more than two
(2) boat slips may be constructed adjacent to each platted single-family
water-front lot, and no more than thirty-eight (38) slips may be
constructed within the project. Except for any deviations listed in this
RPUD Document, all docks and boat slips shall be subject to the
requirements of LDC Section 5.03.06 and, to the extent applicable, the
Manatee Protection Plan.
d. General: The following structures and uses shall be considered general permitted
uses throughout the RPUD:
i. Essential Services facilities designed and operated to provide water,
sewer, gas. telephone, electricity, cable television or communications to
the general public,as described in LDC Section 2.01.03;
ii. Water management facilities and related structures;and
iii. Guardhouses, gatehouses. and access control structures.
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 2 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page -2584-
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The following Development Standards shall apply to all development within the RPUD:
I. Residential: The table below sets forth the development standards for residential
principal and accessory structures within the RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth
herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of
approval of the SDP or subdivision plat:
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SINGLE-FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED /
DETACHED DUPLEX AND
ZERO-LOT-LINE
PRI4CPAL STRUCTURES
MINIMUM LOT AREA 5,602 .F. 2,800 S.F.
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40. 20'
MINIMUM FL :DR APE/. ,21C F. 1,200 S.F,
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK` 20' 20'
MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETHACK : 0' OF S'
MINIMUM SEAR YAR-D SETBACK 20 20
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
STRUCTURE;
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT NOT
TO EXCEED 'ACTJAL/ZGI\ED';
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
MINIMUM FF;' T YAF: ET4-,::!< I 1:
MINIMUM •`E.A YAR: SETS4 ;t 1:
RUILDINC HEIGHT \OT
Tw EXCEEL .ACTUAL,`ZONE
•
F R FRONT E\TRY GARAGE`.:, A MINMV'.M FROM EDGE IF SI'DE'WALY TC:
THE ✓APACE MUST E.E I - O\IDE . FOR SIDE EI:TRI GARAGE` THE MINIMUM •
SETHAC '=Y E RE[ K:E: Ti
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 3 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page-2585-
• ■ •ni.
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT C
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 4 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page-2586-
,-
12/10/2013 17.0.
EXHIBIT "C" (1 OF 3)
...—
;I
:?lel '1.1i11
-_
' I • . " 1
',14L! '•^1 ' ;1
;•-•!,:-, •',! , fi
• ",,.. ! ,gt
1"le-!7•• •;i! , ,
!!, 1.••• ,,- ,:! • ' _ „ 1
1 . i
-.--;
a ■-,z . ,..- .:,
, _ •
I
:-..,_
,1 I ., ,• 0 '- :::,-'------:,,,---.. -
',-,' ,, -■,' I --
.-:-11 It.' 11:1: '..: .,-. '•:_I, g g E 5
,■ : .,_ .,
\ iIs III P .t,7,I- ":I.,:''.,---
...
=I 0, ; ';!:-:I'.7.:,7:F
:,' •, : \N ,,, \ , i
,-:-.-,', : ■ .. \,, —,,, w=
s \
:g.
L, :. i'.
'7 S 0
..
:,7 , 7- \''..-■ \
■;1 ; 7,..-.,'''..:: ,.7'
, '' 1 ‘ \ ,•'''
. ,
7•
7
i II' 'I'• .1.'\\ . 8" `11,•.'''
.:4;',.- 2:7. '1••:. —.,-,. ...:E''.
7' 8
Z"i2:•gf7E.1
1 112 7._.-„-.:'fl 8' ..14.--•g._;-
I 1''' ,..,•,_ ..-
I •,..'i *,"--- ,, ,,
.&- -
. - - NekI, 7 I,\ .-:-•. „ I . I . ,
Il H H'I'•N VI, '\ t., .■
_
,..
I:f. . I
ik-11 - r■ ._, , _ ,
..4.;
• _
,-.
, -
...i.,- ,
t • I TIT II I \ „\• , ,
I . -. , _ L
\'
' I I . _ - •, ..-
1 .•-I. : .
.i• , '1.---\>11A: a .,- za:''---- ' I
,-
1 ::'- "1-0,•:-.I ''' ,, ,,, ".1.gt,z,;•
1 1
I
, ...,-■•• I ..' 't . ,
t.t•''2'.Ei 5
„ .. ,,,,...71..;;:r
. _ .
Ii ”- 1.:T"4 C77„c17,,..,. _tla,1■Cr,21,7,1 7,5777,C117.0d7b, ; <1
; . • , ;
■:''..:
, ., -.,,.•,,_ z I.z
. . _
: I IT'IzcI ,',-,,r1L,,t.',-1, -, c.,...,•,". -'
, r,,' , •
MATCH LINE ,
Packet Page -2587-
1
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT "C" (2 OF 3)
3 ifil 3'
r , o l ; In
1 _ 'i; 0 k$ 0!_
Q .1"4 J/y/
LL 1 / w'
;j of Q. _c a WNC an
_ �m W3 m w0
�c 1- - T I
zoi o W
< J a N- + 2 2
Q
v
v
goo qv W, T• .,
^ i _
1 '
\ I E C O 6 / w. '6-7-
i3
a
ingOi
m.
..Z �=N vi�3 30 pmOC ✓i�w C G 2 ----r'..O Zwww ''
(jiii
wQ ZCC OZ Sw✓NUG ZS °wZ S x < O-
UOR,C=<
4 2 4 U ;J V 4 8L72-,--,,2,-2 0 G p O T Z C O V w '6,,,-=-L,2
OGr G Oat CJ's ¢ J N ° Z Z s-%S
< 2 3 :&-L EL o 3<G < -C J 5" .-‘,.1z J
2Ca Z - ›E` ¢E cif', n.-, :t2:---
-, O p i - .o-,35,,' Z _ ( 1
x C• ZG ✓ <2 '''',,,,E-1','
`�O « N N >
x -C < <KW C z 1i
,
> iOv• -J C_°<C LL G O 3 i
C - <Z C < `l I, < v, C m Z � � I G• O - C % _ Z2
x O EI 't ` OLEO ° � - O
ICS, 0✓- O - C<N C¢5 Cwy ° OGtOi' L1u Z>O: I07=1i
°4U° O G` Z�K> g:-2-'-1- Nlu'J O7< 6.2 pu C L 2 OLL r 32
_U ='.9-,,, ' U -c L O gq}
x;U ; � C � C _
. n J
,,,'-'='
• J Z._ _ C C._
o wc .0_ SW" zry c >,.,„,g,,? x °L_
x? W c <nxx ° ^c ¢
L L
,o "°° -,36L?z _c'N xoc¢, `'
c
_ c z
FU3 p
ry C < j F:4yC5G < ? ''',73>> Z W Fi
2
EE. 2 ,<,-,,s OW• aL Cc ^Z d OY¢.: zI
. CC Z a.Y ^_( ON< 'L` G^ x0G0 @i [i.-2 W
z Z x Viv z---E G L N 3 x ?_J J- 3Z O 3 O 3 w G K Z V
z g",-.5'6'8 o4 ° m ,� _ mQ
O <' Q - '57-‹O <Sw U <G✓; G v 7m�Z S V_ Q CC K'-Ww4°o
'3: > >OQG O--C -�W¢<< >W Viw >`C<J ;Z Cw?OZ
jG3V>..0 OE :I G.wNG O U� G3¢OStnC 01�w GVI�(OYN Om��G¢a
c q < C r Q G' 4
Packet Page -2588-II .
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT "C" (3 OF 3)
o a i-
i en$5m is
I ' \ r _
I S3iavn };
_s _ i { olw
n0 'g VZ I _.---
1 - 'i., 1jZ
a -' O
W > i z a rp�l0 w i!
f°
`O UWj F'z 303 z
Y p,N.. w Z2 N>a an
ry I � z 1 w2� mid wo
mr .co
1 >1 s I _ p a <i� zh 1 o - rww aE 80
dQY oLL wy
ry 0I--Q g.Q G..
i Wpm .i-oj
>¢w >W
J`o o CIZZ
v� Z<—
'oizzi' I5 : 0 y,c
oo Y°ago- C7
5Z
NWg mww
0 m K
z a,,,
g`� �' <02
oSm N ? Z�y O .. .
$ C 'Z'ED OO w3 ggF5
w r O z i E§ z a
I !__t t s`—� G� a =
x Y ',
x' 9'1111 0 W 'E
N z. — d o�z �s�c$rt»
s' < i
W 7� I WI " ia= yy �,0 a Z
�6 z$ '., lac d 0 Uw0 LT; ow o><
Wi w F i t r',5..i . Z5E (jj
I Y <IJI rI-U
slaw. ,E D Z z I
w O- 1
moo 11
1 <w, 1
r
WN Z .1
_ z Z -1s
OE d`!
lljOC (6A '
0 Ii_ I
t
S
T -, O!
rc ,-S'
i — omIO
Qwi
O-I-
-I J
z
f.." - <aI
P. ry _
` c_, J
F - H l .. I�' W
n 1 J
■ i / T ¢ m
in 1d Wi�� C ¢ n _ i
Packet Page -2589-
_
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IN NORTH NORTH trY- SECTION 35. 7OWNSH:;:' 49 SOUTH, RANGE
EAST, BEGIN Ai THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SECTION AND RUN EAST
r 38 2 EF HENCE SC;L.IT/-I 64 W475T 7555.06 Fgr.E 7; THENCE NORTH 664..7,7
FEET TO Fi-:; PLACE 0,*-- BEGINNING, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 5 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page-2590-
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF LDC DEVIATIONS
NOTE: Nothing in this PUD Document shall approve a deviation to the LDC unless it is listed
in this Exhibit E.
1. Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Street System Requirements,"
which states that dead-end streets are prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac, to
allow the internal dead-end street to terminate in a "T"junction vehicular turnaround, as
generally depicted on the Conceptual Master Plan. Final location and dimensions of the
"T"junction shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval, and shall
meet local fire district standards.
2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements,"
and Appendix B, "Typical Street Sections," which establish a 60-foot width for local
roads, to allow a 50-foot wide road in accordance with the internal right of way cross
section attached under Exhibit C.
3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02A.2., "Sidewalks and Bike Lane
Pathway Requirements," which requires sidewalks on both sides of a right-of-way or
easement internal to a site, to allow for a sidewalk to be constructed along one side of the
right-of-way, including the western terminus of the "T"junction described in Deviation #
1, above.
4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.06.E.5., "Dock Facilities," which
requires dock facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with
greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5-foot side setbacks for the private
single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal
within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than
perpendicular to)the shoreline.
5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.07.02.G.1.. "Open Space Requirements,"
which requires that PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units and
accessory uses to devote at least 60 percent of the gross area to usable open space. to
allow at least 50 percent of the gross area to be devoted to usable open space; provided.
However. that landscaping internal to the project shall b.: provided in substantial
conformity with the conceptual enhanced landscape plan attached hereto as Exhibit H.
6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.b.. "Fences and Walls." which
permits walls at a maximum height of 6 feet in the rear and side yards of designated
residential components of PUDs.to allow walls at a maximum height of 8 feet in the non-
waterfront rear and side yards of the residential lots.
7. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.1.b.. "Development Standards for
Signs within Residential Districts," which requires signs within residential PUDs to be
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 6 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page -2591-
12/10/2013 17.D.
located no closer than 10 feet from the property line or from the edge of the roadway,
paved surface, or back of curb, as applicable.to allow project entry signage to be set back
a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line.
8. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.1. "Alternate A: Landscape
Buffer," which requires a ten-foot-wide landscape buffer with trees spaced no more than
30 feet on center, to allow a modified Alternate A Landscape Buffer with trees spaced an
average of 45 feet on center for that portion of the project adjacent to the Golden Gate
Canal. The equivalent number of trees otherwise required by the 30-foot spacing shall be
provided within the Alternative A. Landscape Buffer located on the Residential Tract
along the Golden Gate Canal.
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 7 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page -2592-
12/10/2013 17.D.
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
I. PUD Monitoring:
One entity (hereinafter the "Managing Entity") shall be responsible for PUD monitoring
until close-out of the RPUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all
RPUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this RPUD approval, the
Managing Entity shall be Headwaters Development Limited Liability Limited
Partnership, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership (the "Developer").
Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and related commitments to
a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document to be
approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the
Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer
by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As
Developer sells off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that
includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the RPUD by the new
owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the commitments through the
Managing Entity,but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under
this Section. When the RPUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer
responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of RPUD commitments.
II. Utilities:
Potable water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems shall be
constructed throughout the RPUD by the Developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer
constructed within platted rights of way or within City of Naples utility
easements shall be conveyed to City of Naples pursuant to the LDC.
III. Transportation:
a. Access to and from the RPUD and the Golden Gate Parkway right of way is
provided by the Right of Way Easement Agreement recorded in Official Records
Book 4097, Page 661. as amended in Official Records Book 4535. Page 2342.
both of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida (the "Access Easement").
and Developer shah be responsible for fulfilling its obligations under the Access
Easement. No later than sixty (60) days after approval of this RPUD, an
amendment to the Access Easement between Developer and the County shall
completed, signed, and recorded to: 1. Provide terms for maintenance of the
improvements within the Access Easement; 2. Provide continuous access over the
Access Easement to the County; 3. Permit the construction of a private entry gate
within the Access Easement (to be constructed and maintained by Developer, or
the homeowner's association described in Section V, below), so long as that
portion of the Access Easement over which access is limited by the entry gate is
not open to the public or publicly maintained; and 4. Require construction of
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 8 of 12
PUDZ-PL20 1 20002095
October 24,2013
0
Packet Page-2593-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Developer's connection between the RPUD and Golden Gate Parkway.
Infrastructure internal to the RPUD (not including roads) may be public, private,
or a combination of public and private. Roads internal to the RPUD shall be
private.
b. Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling unit,
Developer shall construct a single sidewalk connection between the RPUD and
Golden Gate Parkway. Two alternative scenarios may be proposed for the
sidewalk connection:
i. Default Option: Developer shall construct a sidewalk within the Access
Easement from the RPUD entrance to the shared project entrance with the
Gordon River Greenway Park; or
ii. Alternative Option: At the discretion of the County Parks and Recreation
Department and in lieu of the Default Option, the Developer may elect to
connect to the Gordon River Greenway Park asphalt sidewalk that runs
north south parallel and adjacent to the Access Easement ("County's
sidewalk segment"), provided that the necessary access rights are
conveyed to Developer, and — to the extent required by law — the entire
sidewalk segment from the RPUD to the Golden Gate Parkway right of
way is made to be ADA compliant at Developer's cost. The proposed
connection is at or near the southern end of the County's sidewalk
segment, as shown on the attached Sidewalk Exhibit, with all design,
construction and permitting costs to be paid by Developer. If this option is
exercised: 1. Final approval of the sidewalk interconnect plans shall be
subject to review and approval by County Parks and Recreation staff, in
addition to the appropriate Collier County Growth Management Division
staff; and 2. The Developer, its successors and/or assigns (which may
include the homeowner's association described in Section V, below), shall
bear a proportionate fair share responsibility for maintenance of the
County's sidewalk segment in perpetuity.
c. Developer and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) (which ma• include the
homeowner's association described in Section V. below) shall be responsible fo-
al] operation'and maintenance of the internal RPUD roadways. sidewalks or their
appurtenances. and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of
any such roadways. The foregoing operation and maintenance obligations include
the Access Easement, except that portion of the Access Easement that provides
shared access to the Gordon River Greenwav Park.
d. Developer shall not deprive the County Parks and Recreation Department of use
of the Access Easement for purposes of maintaining the Gordon River Greenwav
Park or any of its related features or appurtenances.
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 9 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page-2594-
12/10/2013 17.D.
e. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for any structure in the project,
Developer shall pay the County (Parks and Recreation Department) one-half of
the total sum of$140,365.20 as reimbursement for %Z of its fair share of the funds
expended by Collier County for construction of roadway improvements within the
Access Easement. The remaining '/ balance (or $70,182.60) shall be due and
payable to the County (Parks and Recreation Department) prior to issuance of the
first certificate of occupancy for a dwelling unit.
IV. Environmental:
Pursuant to LDC Section 3.05.07H.1.f.i. and iii., Developer shall satisfy all of its on-site
native vegetation preserve requirement by making a monetary payment to Collier County
in the amount of $103,255.00. The payment amount is based on the allocation of the
$1,500,000.00 purchase price paid by Developer for the RPUD to the .74 acre area of
native vegetation that would otherwise be preserved onsite. The payment shall be made
prior to final site plan and/or plat approval, whichever is earlier.
Developer, its successors and/or assigns (which may include the homeowner's
association described in Section V, below), shall be responsible for maintenance of
improvements located within that portion of the Golden Gate Canal within the project
boundary, as depicted on Exhibit C.
V. Planning and Common Area Maintenance:
Prior to issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, Developer shall establish
a homeowner's association, which shall be responsible for maintenance of the RPUD
common areas,water management areas, community infrastructure, improvements within
the Access Easement,and internal roadway.
VI. Miscellaneous: A certified archaeologist will be onsite during all excavations to monitor
for the presence of historical and/or archaeological artifacts or resources.
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 10 of 12
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page -2595-
-rnagalus a wag RA,.
12/10/2013 17.D.
SIDEWALK EXHIBIT
The Landings at Bear's Paw Page 1 1 of 1.2
PUDZ-PL20120002095
October 24,2013
Packet Page-2596-
12/10/2013 17.D.
Y
.
.�.3.. i Sren..- Mt— yc IS$
_ f< a is sic *� s 1.
A ^M 1
i% :".v.�� ', a v\ s - 17°`.. ''S s:.�.�8 ",. 37,r. ,* • • w—
- ` - �I ".r °
� n _-- �� - 1 .l J7Tiuu :- F ,s �; 'lam—. 7-/- co Z
} • ..' '. �^ H w
t „ XV ` �
z` "d.,,, + g ta• Et
I „ , W .•' w i8 r -.a ,� / * ,I
Ili � r
'�
* r a
w� zJ�. , • 1P , d
ow it r ) . / V cn vi / ' W =5",„,,,..,,q1 ` �'f► zsvF u /
ggyg k{ W
—S` c� z 4 • * at
w wW ; * J' / W
U L'1:-
l i-
I."-.?-, L aro ,.---\„,_,1—.... 1—.7:s . In{ . ' ,
ro
, < .— / • ■
0,_ z W i∎ p +.. _
X 1C • 11, . Dp _,,,L.' 'N,.,./
! •,. ,
9a l;1r t� .. >3
! E'
II C F�
—1_ c--__--__—__—__ a - "_____�_ S
c �rs��e se •• 'Amur&- ------ xmsavenv-m wae-y.
W
I I
OD
NQ
Packet Page -2597-
f
12/10/2013 17.D.
atztzu -
; L, i,■;;
! ;; ;: ■
L
1.4 wl,,,,-''.;.- ,, ' f; ,
■
Ohl , i 1
&Ed 94J2Qg 12 99UTpUBI Ql.ti fri'lifti
ilf..41t11,,
0;
t
, 1 f? 10
, , 4
It H I _i ,t1 )1 'ii,,
7, ITil H ; F .1 4 it fif
lo., - i E II! n: t
.
- 15 iiiiii:iiil
I' '1' ill'i
1 .tlf -. .
1 4 ltlipsit:
t ti5
ii,,, 14 L, -H____._____3 " .:•-• j ,,,, – .1.-,1 .:
,... .:
:6., I Iiiiilii511
1 1:( , .i i ■ :!'i I I, I 1 1,- - i i; .' 1 !i % i :
, 4 ill i'! Willi iii! '!;'1. ill ii 11 q i il ti 11111 Viiil
ti,„ 1$, , 1' . =0 ,1 ife;l0 . . 1 , ;If. fi o!Oi • ; , . NI, q .- , ?..
i
°:It t' ' " -; Illii illiiii411i ! Iliaiii1W qii;; !! i g q !ill' li i !,1 !
*!41 '..\irel''' ' - 'i;4= !Iiiit!iiiii Ilfiiii4:11 iii!ii I:- i h li i;111 11 Wiifl
;
I'llf 11'.,,'''''',,: '''' 1 lii! 1411111OP iliiiiigilill iiiilltil i 11 iiTiliir!!!Piiii
c'.6 D.'. '-:' E ;Cu pitel'ci t.ff osi aa:t.,.1,#i1;: 41HD ,-8 tiw!1:.:fiLvill !
0 W ' -, ' i''14t40011iftiii,01 :101W!!4,iffli;Off10.1,=0.iiiaTi ff:01
i
z
is ni
ii
ilf iP I. la
.....J.a, , al,
!;• ....., ..-'' ''''',---
TO •
PP. l'; : • £
4
1
t 'z
....... .. ---IL
tlf, .1
l'ir
i a; .• , Eli' ,1;sx-1, t, -, : --
.il.:, ; !`-'/i'it. it.. 1'1'1 0 ;;;;`',-,''.;
,rg ..: ,, 1 --- --- --- —1 I
Fr '
41 ' ' 11
: -
;114
ii
t ,A
, ..,
1,, rit 1■I , , - :
$
I 2
! .... 0
..
I i 2 tl
i 11/ 6
EL
..:,...i;
. '
1
7.. ,
:, ir 412Z:...7—
•2.■., , 41,,,, 11'
... „ L._:"::Iii,ii'1,:.,. "7 7,:r, ••
1: " "re ' •fli,'"d, .1:''". .
r '*". "Ii.:: , ''''''''''''..;1'''• 1 '"
=i: ?C., I '"''. '''.7;::.•"•'',''' . ':;. ''' -
I ,'-'' \AL
{ '''.. •
'
'-a• - ' ,„t„?.. " .:::::
--1
!I fl
„.,: : 7 ra ,':' ,'" ' • t. H'''' \ ' ,
. 1
I ' "''' 'k 'Ii'''''' ''''-'-'-' Y ''",...
' - —4 .‹? '''
.. . —_
___ .
7 --Li ,
CI , 1
Z '
ii
it_
r,
e
; n ,
0 ;i II iL P e$ i
t...;.
i
,
I :1; '` : 14 1:;•-• '!'
Wilt
I !In
;04t,
Vi1.1
H;1:..,ni,t
1
1
, Packet Page-2598-
[
12/10/2013 17.D.
■ , '-.1-t;;i.ii.■.!i i !''' I: I i
1.;kpfilo,■-
!I I
113
A\pd RIJEQg "IP 99upue1 Qt.,"
L - I . , .•
m I'L
0 1 F
...!..1 .,I:■.
.I
. -
.: I/'''''F.'-1/!'•
a,
\ .rt 3,, ,., is 1 :,,, i fifttft 1 , , 1 ; • 1 , 1:
...- !:!i:, ' 1,ti- .!! l' ,•;'''',7 I!''!''k' ! ! Hipp141 ! ith 1 ! '
Al \ ' • V" " L. ) '.,) 1 ,; , ,,
17 1 7
10i10 '..'I' ...:1"7- :77" 11 In i it 7 1!1111111111i III; il!ilii/1! 1111 II
,,,,, i;i ,j , , IT Of i3O II Ogiiggii,;:i Ili oil alp! !gm ; ill:
„ 0 .•. '), \
', ,•'I',4-7t,.;-...I.,..1 •„\, I Of 111111 °q!
:,, tii- I-,;'-iiiiill
iii t...! :igg,
\ 1, ..,.:- ltl• l ill li; l'l
I l ..1-5t02:-;-* ,t ! ' t ; ; li
li t lil li
ll ill............ Ili l:ri.i.iiii ,li. li F.O. ll li lill,..11
It
l lilh I f li. ;1**IP i' 1' I.' l;il I 111
t*L;2,d; .iiptt 11,t 3.l.1 ...,!,,nght ...,li
lil$ 41;
ll
1114, Ilil
— .,•••; ,,,,hirtf l'' v—,-,' ..-, , :, i!,,li qiio lo l otmo ILif il, 1, F
f I Iri
;I i ''!!:'-‘•.; - ir :-I'I' I\:gill LT I •..;::'W.:, ' I' II iiIiii11141111 li' 0;114'1'1'd!j1:1/1 11,li 111
0:!6,,;___4 ..ert1.;,! , ' 1711 !Ili-'4-:".,'=;-4,11'itgiN1401),Idill l' '1.
%ltl
.,..,
7;7; 5„ i ...-.,7
._ .,„
-,--
,= ,t. I. i.,t k-.1-,,j3_----
• 1 '''' -----
.!
t —, ,, .,....- i ..*:.?•, .1.1‘, ,1„t?
4.44.
•1 - :, : e ,,,,,,_ :_
, „,...4:._ .. ,
'
ct ,// ,,,: t i k '.'''ci '! i 4r,.. '1''' . ,'''" '‘.•:11,r. ' \ ' _j'12Eil.,: II,) t, if'. ■lit ill
i t-..:;t- t;'7 g ?, i I :4,, j, , 4;,,.;.-,•:,t‘,„,:&.:-..' 4-':it.:-,A- ' '.4.w1,.=-i- tw,, ilg :,,
,,t1-II- ''' --i--- ; •_,
/ 1 `4'' ' s'''`'s ' .I.:- I - ' «
i :a CV
,14• ; ; ,. i:[ X Li• i --. &".>:.41:'," ,-:
tpj : LEJ ,-/ 7 , !'• ,,:\k-, -.!"'" -!---z!‘ '!!!•'-, -- \ . 1 i g
,.., s. :.--- - ,
'..!, !!!!;"*..
_-.4,;,..T: V4'2-!.‘ ‘
!,t ";.; 7 !!-' i i •/!!! - t! V!
PAHWI; ;i .!"•'!!7!!,!!!!!!!! ,,...'"' ,- ,.! .,!1•! i •if.,
I "),,i
.1-- '''' ''..tt., '1':::::,,,,,,..■ ,
r,'-'7.,' .'-■,,,i,...,= .
),' .-- --
:'..-4/ irk"'''.2`-'C,' ''..'" ' ''•'...
., 7 . ,F;.... , :'.. :,' ,N:, li „,,ft,',:,:•,:,V-,,,.. ,
'; ), ''i -- I--7 ---7'.,'i , ' •*2i ,.',,:' -'''' ' '?'11-;;', 'i
:.
Fr h r:1
:. ; I,iq.t, '',.' r— • ',-1 - rJ , , -,.•, ----- " "•"'";:,:tc,! f., .',.:-
,; ..;.-..
, ,...; - • a
.
.. ,
i"— '`,'i,';,,''•' j.. itsU"-.':, '1- 1''?. ''-ri '.!;,1...i i'if ----C:.i, ': - 4 ' !!!!!!,:. •-T-1- . -!)::.!;i'''':::-., :- -.
1. ,-,.,:. . , ,. 1,. ..„. ,,,,t-o..- ,,,,.k • .. Ap!!!..406H, , ,,,,!!;.i.J . ,,,.--!.--,-,,,!;:;- if,.. ,
_
4 ,!" !"• 7 9'7_ .; !.. .:','=""" 'J',? --oso •t:-• ' -" ii'ii;::
<% i ' 21 .,':- - ''.: ,' -.H.-: -— ---:E-.; f,---•-,z-, -.1., - pit-1.i';-' ,'.., '.::::.„: ffiffi
g !„!!!;,•-,, !, k 1 , _____ ! !!... _-_,! -_',...2.,:;!:.--.--- !-,T ,..;...,:.) --, - — — ' --\ :Ifii
g
;If'. .:', ;_,r; 1 tjEd=• ' i
id) !----•---- ; ! ! -!---------- „ ' _Li 3
AM4i.a.
Packet Page -2599-
r
12/10/2013 17.D.
,
F L
r I
■A---;,k' i:Tgi q
1:
i =
41113_ '! 1
1.1
1 /116c1 giap,Qg le g-2 TpuP1 Qt-ti Itiqi.i,
[ ,
i li!
,;,„
, ; i.1 11;,:
I.!, 1 ,,,
leg,li Ili! Ili; ‘,//,,,,/
H 41
iii , g°' '. :P 1.^! 1 11 if:
rilte g%.
fr.:-Ol! t :$141 iti , g3 gie, I . E 1.11
1:1!; •! Ill! ,,t )t, it.'
Iii'it I
I it ilial ,g 11!!1 rrgii ; !i lil'ii/ ii!! 1 il 1: 1' I
'.4 it! il
..,1 g.
' N ,iII.fq.
11 ,I
-••••=„== clit ,, . . , ,, ..
.. • ,
ll=111
...,..
t'.- /=1 . e = : : - i:i: ,; it
' 2,1•iii: II: ki ; -1:' :: : : I: : lg ,
Etilt,
..1 ■ . ,i hi iil I! ' II. I til i
111
!! 631, „ p 2 ii;'ff si Itil , 1 :i : ll !.!l etlll t f• 1 't '`
it, 0 ii1::It",-! 5 :hi: it it 1,,, t 2ilt.i .71 E i.1't,i)1 ft 11 ii
l-, En - - 2' -IT:: il: r•i.,
' \ . ''t `—' ' cr, .tlfz: .,..e •. I. . A."t , .. . .
*t 1: rig: g .. tic , ;
i \ I Of'! gi P.
...
:,:: iii..1: 15 : = I --.._,
+1
F 11p g I I: • ' ' '
... iilt:: t g 11: iii`i lib 1. i !, 1.,-■,
Pill': t Y!ftiit!1!144r!:11Pilif ; s ' 047'1.-, ;`
lit— $ 1; rtf./Zir■ !Illi./iil!iiiiitlfs; ' 2, '''ka.' `k i
,--- ■1 .,...... i .-I,
1 'irillill ;E:iliii!=;!1!!!!1!!IIII4 ° rttlll—'.I0',II-
\\
I
IIII! i ill •ll \ li !Iltl!:liliVilliell'1;:llitlillIllf!Illl'llf!,l; gIll ll'I
IIASIil 17. II I/I "I'l ,..-ll VI ll Ill!!!ifi,•:,-14,1:'!;!Ililiii;.!VII; TSI l'":,4,_ l' k
jss\i„
1 1 I II i Ill ,l.:ll%
5 !
ir 1,i :\,..s.:7:::............... f-,"'mti.X;!t4.15_:i.,...
■ 11.`,.- ■ -..
1 k - * -:-. , CS i { = i;It 3
i
i 1\\ '''," il N i '',,,2' , 13 ,A... _„..:- ,,, :•:=
/ I *:: 2 i;
s
el
ii l ''' ''', -- - ■1;'. o
ittx !i e .2 e
c'
--%-,,,,, . ----'.--
/
:: : : -'
.T'
'I 1 c ....
• lc c
,
1'i.::Zi '?.. I
..-.
...- ... „_
____, ,„ , ....14 ....4,
:_.,
t .:... :1,
21
„ t
1 I
-.-.-.--....-.•.------------..-=-"::--"'":"'"'':-'%'"-r-'?::"::=7i.F:::FF'..r.?:::E-iF-*Z-7"..i::'77,;-:::.-=::::;:..r....
Packet Page -2600-
17-j_ a `� ' ° � _� 12/10/2013 17.D.
�. °e, ,�i
a a ° ■
' s. ■
i� a.■ aq --E i 1
-^_. - _ ° n•
. gg1q a cc2 —' —.6 ■ 1
-- w , ;Ja : @ o ,
W .. a a a- .--;',7_ a
m o .-
i <
g I a Q...""11116.-\ I i
tat
Ca
-s -1.1-1■ .lala dri•la•lale a 1 Z
a Mont a y.
P..1_-. ��1 I I ��.�ww.e, < ! AAHly.' SW Alo snow. -J• ood ——-7;-•-4–�.- Z
i 0
C
N
�
.
1
a
I
1 R $ "b111111h.� ■nr"°°'a' �� 7 l0
4 Ir ...._._-. N
39 dd : a ' fD,
\1 a 6 UO• Q 2 K LL 41 N b.
I 1� $S inns wan 1 2 5 g O
a a�.�� s S N
J'
d
311/35 OL loN N
Q'
me Zi
Si 31V1sa31Nl qq '� - , _ i O
,, oel3an3uur H
1 111121 IS a+^N^ F§e
_ xbb C R n s3NY'l aoo■rn m11 I��. y - "- W
w3w g - n� I
.- l
113. 12 id Y - c 3 . I 000631avN _ rt Q'
_ �b� oa g
E. A_ ObOa NOISONI fl .\
it It `� i t t z F
o .- W, ,_ >: _ y= £to. 10,\ ap �� � ' I \ xw �,
NoTSan � woa 0Nmno-laoearo �� WZg --I �y�'J■
=7Id ■ > g, Way
c , 3Na0 3aONSAVS Ng .(
Ti am 1 j ��` a � $ n `�� vvjS �� W!I a" M
h 1< o ,i di -' `O - N 3 _ - It .' d Z
g ` °a
s` -` g '' c
Y-gra'g
I� a ;
C f—
II7 1111111111., • gois I _, , ,'
___. ,__ OvOa NNa3-311310000 U
PO n ace'a'3)N r �lit-l'
O
d 0 Y16 I N. Wird,9 , '(U'sn) -uval w riv1
P.
m ^ NM°
11511111.1174- 111111
nsrsv OF YEX1C0
•
Packet Page-2601-
EXHIBIT "C" (1 OF 3) 12/10/2013 17.D.
m
_ e,
e72
P
I m
IV I 1z—s sL. 3 W L.
I,1 ' r1 z` a's w 3—3-& N ! �I�o15�m vsi
c w w w O
w w
NI li Ni U K a K
° Q UUUUU U j Q
I ''I �5a ^ 'QQQQ
M,m I m
I 1 \ I _-u�O�N u�� �p � Vz
� I
z u 90
L"----1',.u.:14 i '- -\ z
i iii u. ,z Z w J °o o °
�� WW
..T ° \ Q ww °° 5 Q .s
I d o� o JY) oo o z °w 1211
\ ? )K w 3-K W O o c
' 1 \ \ \ w� Z `,1,-' w2 � v c,_ ¢Oz z
II \ Qoo w� ,v., QQ Q pQ NJZ
\I 05 0 o oz-<> ft-''' - LJ ,,,>, cn
Q U w w cJ g cw W 04 V-
II 1 = wzz vw =o I ww w , x I�w mco wo
wgll zcr �w
ZS J r--
°o I I I I \�� t � gt.m Q
L III �� T. \ _'�
0 0 \ \ i-oo
F G w w O�r
6 O
, \ .p KLL
ma.
Us,,-.
Z w
a \
N� `Y 1 ry
\ L7 r
°Ls <. / r za Z
y a ■ a`9° w I,' p� \ 0 • Z=o°gEw
QaN I 1 ^ JoFt maic I o� ��� o °u�a z�gt'„„o
acs = Q>� o� '\ d �� \ Czroc wz "'--»
Z m�z >za Q i N o oc, - a3-`
-,00 z �z�n c �� r3 � � �o s, ar�c, �gwa
'`g o N^ �\ 2,- O J6J t �N�
rJiyn o ��n v \ /� \ �W 6 \ z ? '4 3
so \ \3 �✓
- I z �
(ii
-6-.÷.,4,=-I O III a ° , s\ / o , \s �m g= e
1 a troy o � i V m �° ao c
v\ - vv w
,'V �`�°r v v - z I
C
I
-.1.\\
_ \\ LL' _
\
II A . LIB I
. \ u � �'c 816
III I /� %
V o 0- L_
� A viz
cw I
Oa \ r Em v: W
ww
u _ a�_
a s.3so,8oad�1 LNd ION)O ON SS377V/QJSOdaad I 1
2 r �---- —N J a
/ — w� N
03 ca>-
ao iti ?acc°
rn Quo c ° a,
o - W y ¢N yc�[�I-a a
was www0� as ov~'i o< zfo ii
o- _ ozw aN
N�pU �Uw��j � Ow J�n°.•�M nm C c z
MATCH LINE zoa Packet Page -2602- W
EXHIBIT "C" (2 OF 3) 12/10/2013 17.D.
ago I=
31 -1 ..„ :
w
VI> 'I o vi H
n
f
I ZI w ��■ OI z W,j w� 0
3
z
z °m F
z ! °z �ma W
cc
°° LL �=z W
> ' tin O LL r�
wJ
N ' L `'' Q 3 d z,E6 EE x <Oz z
Q ow L?,..]e .7- >-}
a. w°a a4 Lt.
IS W _ zw p <QL. zeq
`^ c, Z :a W o 3 2 00 w
LL zoo
a< z J \ p owL �i
ii w , Q _ 0 zxm w n
° U� w°z gWm iv
6_,&° I 'r t` m r'00
�� s° o Z o�
I O�c ` 1 H_,, U 1 6 o� �� w
�. o of
°w
d rw
aw r8
s, a
- z€o-_
QiWa -
m 3
3
ci
0 N W
o o f 0 m Cr w 6.1
N o?(n No3 ao zmoe N 0 0 omw 3
Z 3 O w N w N Cr N 0=` O U
W U Z C W O N„, z_.O U°' ° Z 4 w G
2 a z O w O0 Z Z Z SN < wZ S S Z w N Z
v', Z ww -o02 UL'wNry 2LN°C5 3 C% aOow WOw03 <
<;5� c=r We<� _�°�< 2z a oT zaw� cocMa-'2- '
o°- W�� �_� Y z -�< oEaw `n New m<
w Z ,W° Ow 0 a m O w- S C`- v J-->w_ :,E=:',7 c—) N Q e C_ °�G=O�
c�< �` < cEU: Oc,��: °c4' - w� `zw > 5v�:
.7 N c
Cr z<z- -Y”? . ��.,L,z .,i Q Z wSw I..NOw -
< 7--?78 moo zw� _3
c _ 07 V, <0'6- UGr< a <c '3:----, 1
w C, - �J V _ ° O�'- C - Z C.' _ _ _ o S 3 III
L.U W N W
U U w - N S
.LL m3 -m ---= ,nLnOwc in me gym_ -m z3� ` zt
C,o ww m0 _Z NU N G-- cp.t. _;- _UU_ ryw JO Q N}U_ C: <o,- C
N w Z ', <L-2-...
`< C W< O N W_ O O<<w w O Y w r°- O-- .,LE:w `Ee,
.E-z - .S° 1p °, Z
.E-z - ,.Y_ Y W��z= c= 0. w<- 0U,- -c 2 s'
m- oc ooh NLL --UZ <,__ coo — o.° >o
O G cc< - ina OY U' c' w. �.`� v,r� 0z [_— a
zm ZW Z� 3� w<" �Uocc ° r ow - - �zwo=�
o�-``'` 0i o= < 0 3 2n,,- owe r= o cW z z5 wW_
w
O C V z-z _°. o cc w O <Z m J
5 Z �-N.r_.W N -C r W
w,w<w Z` wZ U 0 ' _ U r 0 w� U `.Co U S•- w U° 0_ RR
UN°>�Q No m NwwO~ in�°�°-n3?z= NOwwc� v�ooz in=OL` in w~a` . ..,
-,LL. -,,,. c<< O.O¢°L c<o C N O o�Q c °rL'', o' ` _ °U c Z o o
EC Z W LL,�c W s J U� U -a_ -oZ G Lri U_ r-in<Z_
onzw=< ow3m o`-�zm o=�JW< O-_N z o�z� oowmz o,z„c'Uaz
l`°-U� C 00 a 0c.- K -9 KNOW°aw .,- c -o E c, - Ww<o
z oQ ``,n5z =� - oo�- U- ''ow-°v, '-Fm' ``N°c zoaN
-' _< > < o0 w 3 V:.< U- 0,z 0 w°O >m0 U—00 W 0 a _aw W Ur°
.. NO J 3 a wN 1 <Z - QOz 0w w Z W• �"NU'UZ o_
U K 3°Z w w=1 , i9, J' < 1 w w w w C N Q G U U w <w 0<
p oo °a 'w°c ','=' 'J—'2 E CNgc ° � ¢.-- W-77-<< c-°>'°io
.-1 Y 0 Z< N!'<¢ N m I Q Cr U: Z UWi NCj/1 w°Z V:<Z�i NW D N OtiQ°�J
W Q<C W Z w- _ w w<C N< w <U w i2i, w w°OE LT, W
C < S .10Z N W Y Z� �
0 = < 0¢ w z S w t` w Z Q o z N N w z w W w
O V_ � W m_,z N Km[° LL' Q Vw1wce°N>p U JWO Lntrciw w vWi T <„,-
CC ii_ a�a�zz oa� azw? aoc�� �n5�ww�i CU. Cr- r-zoem mE'Ho>m z
aNC<w wow i-° a°rm�� xow¢ Wa a3o= �^2�m0 a3z ,mw
Z O~ 1 a z m z wtiN z w zN.- = z,,,,,,_O.1 z «- Z „:- z: W'-.°w J
7
O ,==0;L;0_,Om0 om 0Cwom O 3=z< C oNW a OWZZ o30<w 0,-,_NWwU
P 0 J S U> >°Q O =--N >O N m°m V O w m<z > N w >z O a Z >W W-ai O°
Q W=0 w O W w<0 0 w a<C w w w.0 0 0 0 w r z w N r.L w W W w w 0 O O 0 w 0C-°w Q
> oa U>_,O c aKU °aw N° °Kw o.-- Oda 07Nm °4.0w °N Wcc N °mm1-acct
E Q Q C Q Q Q < a
1
Packet Page -2603-
»a,c∎oza,o, rn.UOO U41\E,..,,v,.,103..,.....1...Lowannum3 7.1.7.ri..oce:..-=,..,r,..wx,.,a.=ma,.
EXHIBIT "C" (3 OF 3) 12/10/2013 17.D.
Tx io
g wwvQ`;
- ' iY n
mom,
z� I°
° dp
1 Z sco ore'Is
l ;
S3W A \
Y Y Y Q
V < I m
~ m m I K Z U w d� N
V1 1/I I j � 3 U� z _
U LI-j
a< a< oN I �omaN Y ❑
I
I m m Ow
g7-s � L I J N }Z
0 °o v J 1 ❑
.i-12 ¢w 1 r Q F, I-H o W
O� Z 171
o
I f ' ( z J z a° ° z I l c� J O 2❑ n <oPZ �
�z
z z z ° Uw wFaW Jz m r a < a'W 0 Z2 z a5
"'
o in I W w° ~
m=d m w e w O
E ❑ f'F w U
I 7 z O§5 aQl- zM< z F W W z O I I o N J)J� Zo W
I dQ a w
l O� V m m—
L J m w` r 1 j
z Z pi >,_
W og
o boo N o Z a Z
z w z R'c
�wo� U� J
oo�;.ama� =Z U'w
N°O N ❑C 2 Et
a� Z d N zUwa� <0z
,OWEN ct W O
Q
Z J
H a
, i _t_ ,I-0 ,u""->o.'4'Z t i i','
Y
I r � — X W d 2 Ui °
❑W O zo=-
o
O W Z ZsNi 'm m m I > m _1 cc
<c m
? Z � � 3 Q > Z ao
z` '-z3 u I z¢
f o . E �tt Uwp
m - n Z t z
61.1
S3121VP c Y U O Z
I d I
a }
=C I t- Hd
1 c w O
Z °W
W C
r r 0 -j ❑ C i
I.
c z< V: z Zz2 al
- zwZ w
0 �a�a,
Q3 Z Wz'
m oo� 5'm
_w c c ''IF,
LC '7 as a< C N'4 �,
< -
W�' z
1a < I� I
T
o° I T I OQ
r2 >° r � i I QW
52 oN - N N J❑
2= E4 ° : < }
O J
z`` z z > a O - -- z
z W J Q U
N N o 1 1 S3121VA a 8 U W w z 2
I_ i 1L < d J w o N
t i i Z 3 z
z w 3
w
p -' z
m N < I 11
N p w Z U W< O
Q W U r O
3��
`Packet Page-2604-
12/10/2013 17.D.
From: Will J. Dempsey
To: SuleckiAlexandra
Cc: "Kevin Kina"; Paul Hatcher; Grea Wardebera; THallClaturrell-associates.com
Subject: Landings at Bears Paw
Date: Friday,November 15,2013 7:36:16 AM
Good morning Alex. As a follow up to our conversation of yesterday, I'm writing to confirm that the
Landings at Bear's Paw PUD developer is committed to making a payment to Conservation Collier in
the amount of$103,255.00 as part of our rezone. This payment amount was stipulated as part of
the October 17 Planning Commission recommendation for approval as an alternative to acquiring
and donating land in Eastern Collier County to Conservation Collier.
Prior to the October 17 Planning Commission hearing, our submittal documents provided for the
following with regard to onsite native vegetation preservation:
• Acknowledgement that.74 acres of onsite vegetation qualified for preservation.
• Commitments by the Landings developer(pursuant to the corresponding LDC provisions)to
either:
o Acquire and donate land to the County for conservation purposes pursuant to LDC
3.05.07H.1.f.iii.b). We calculated the estimated cost of this option at around
$50,000; or
o Make a monetary payment to Collier County pursuant to LDC Section
3.05.07H.1.f.iii.a). We were advised that the payment in lieu amount is
$168,500.00.
As a practical matter, the developer could not justify choosing the $168,500 payment in lieu over
the $50,000+/- land donation alternative. The $168,500 amount had no rational basis in terms o=
the value of the .74 acre preserve, and more tnan three times as costly as the and donation
alternative. The developer accordingiy nrepared in earnest to satisfy its obligation through the
acquisition and donation or suitable propertr.. As an asiae, the existing mangroves within the
Golden Gate Canal were always planned to be preserved and we accordingly sought equivalent
uplands property in Winchester Head to acquire and donate.
Planning Commission Chairman Strain suggested an equitable payment alternative with a sound
rational basis: To calculate the payment in lieu based on the pro-rata allocation of the acquisition
cost of the overall site to the .74 acres. The 10.75 acre parcel cost$1,500,000.00 to acquire, which
results in a pro-rata valuation of$103,255 for the .74 acres. This is more than double the estimated
cost of acquiring and donating equivalent land to the County. We agreed to this alternative at the
Planning Commission hearing, have incorporated the payment obligation into the project governing
documents, and look forward to proceeding on this basis.
Atikkr
As a practical matter, the Developer will always select the land donation alternative if forced to
decide between that option and a $168,000 payment. We hope this explanation suffices, and please
Packet Page-2605-
12/10/2013 17.D.
feel free to contact me directly should you wish to discuss the matter in advance of your Monday
hearing.
P.s.,the Planning Commission recommendation for approval includes a recommendation that the
funds be earmarked for acquisition of the CDC Parcel. We support that recommendation as well,
although we appreciate the fact that the funds may be used elsewhere if available
Greenway/Conservation Collier funds are insufficient to pay the CDC Parcel asking price.
Many thanks Alex,
Will J. Dempsey
Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer
CHEaFFY PASSIDOMO Cheffy Passidomo, P.A.
anaxrt's nr «V 821 5th Avenue South
Naples, FL 34102
(239) 261-9300 telephone
(239) 261-9782 facsimile
wjdempseyCg napleslaw.com
www.napleslaw.com
- Pm
• 7r
4 4 tA
14'0 ctc sM
This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is
confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you),
please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us(collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from
your computer.Any unauthorized review, use,retention,disclosure,dissemination,forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited.Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the law firm.
Packet Page -2606-
12/10/2013 17.D.
•
28D D Wednesday, November 20, 2013 )) NAPLES DAILY 'NEWS
•
•
•
NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,December 10,2013, in the Boardroom, 3rd
Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3299.Tamiami
Trail East, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the
enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00.A.M. The
title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
AN 'ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER
COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 200441, AS AMENDED, THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT. CODE, WHICH ESTABUSHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF•
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS
MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT
WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES
W-3 AND W-4 (ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING•DISTRICT WITHIN WELLFIELD RISK'MANAGEMENT
.SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-3 AND W-4(ST/W-3 AND ST/W-4)FOR A
PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE LANDINGS AT BEARS•PAW RPUDJO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 25 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND UP TO
38 BOAT SLIPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE GOLDEN GATE CANAL SOUTH OF
BEAR'S PAW IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COWER
COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 10.75 +/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.'(PETTTION:RZ-PL20120002095)
Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are
available for inspection.All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the
County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an •
individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If
recognized by the Chairman, a.spokesperson for a group or organization may be
allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda
packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective
public hearing: In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the �
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will
become a permanent part of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the .testimony and
evioence upon which the appeal is bases
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in the proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management
Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Building W, Naples,
Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listenino devices for the hearing impaired
are available in the County Commissioners'Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA
GEORGIA A.HILLER,ESQ.,CHAIRWOMAN
DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK
By:Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
November 20 2013 No 2007230
•
Packet Page -2607-