Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/11/1986 R .. .. .-J Tape t1 Item t1 March 11, 1986 ~GENDA - APPROVED WITH THE POLLOWING CHANGES Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the agenda be approved with the following changes I A. Itc~ lOA2 - R~au~st for fair permit from Immor-alee Jaycees - lidded ß. Ite~ ~Cl - Ordinance re Tourist Development Tax _ to be heard at lC:30 A.~. c. Item lOCI - Approval of proposed I~useum site to be heard at 11:00 A.M. Itell .2 MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 18, 1986 - APPROVED Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried un~nimously, that the minutes of February 18, 19RG, be approved. Item .3 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS Commissioner Pistor presented Fmployee Rervice Awards to the following employees: George Richmond - Engineering Douglas Greenfield - EMS Jerry Hamm - Road & Bridge Loretta Collins - Library 5 years 5 years 5 years 5 years ItelD .4 PETITION R-85-24C, DOMENIC D'AGOSTINO, GC TO C-J POR PROPESSIONAL OFFICES AT GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY & CR-95l - TO BE READVERTISED POR PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER II, 1986 Legal notice was published in the Naples Daily News on January 17, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of PUblication filed with the Clerk. Planning/Zoning Director Pettrow stated that with reference to Petition R-85-24C, the Petitioner requested a continuance from March 11, 1986, to May 6, 1986. and they also r~quested that this item be sent back for review again to the ccpe at their April 17, 1986, hearing. He stated that if the Board elects to send this petition back to the cepe or continu~s this petition beyond March 25, 1986, it will have to be readvertised again as a new petition. Mr. William Barton of Wilson, Miller, Barton, 5011 & Peek, Inc., stated that the reason for this continuance request is so that the ðOO( 092 PAG[ 452 Page 2 .. 092 Pl~~ '.~ 53 !o1arch 11,1986 ðOO~ petition can to go bRck to the ecpc because the petitioner feelfl that he has made siqnifica~t progress with the property owners in the area that were objecting to the petition, addinq that it is their hope that between now and the next ccpe ~eeting that they will be able to resolve the issues. The following people spoKe in opposition to this petition being conti~ued until May 6, 19A6, citing the fact that a lot of the winter residents will not be available at that ti~e and they would either liKe the hearing in April or next fall, citing concerns regarding the use of the golf course. traffic, and ingress and egress: David Lee, Attorney representing Par One residents George Keller James Toomey Charles Brueggeman Ray Martin Tape .2 Mrs. R. B. P~zelle Gerry Janisse Mrs. L. Barabas Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by eommissioner Goodnight and cArried unanimously, that Petition R-85-24C, Domenic D'Agostino, be continued to November 11, 1986. Item .5 ORDINANCE 86-11 RE PETITION R-85-30C, WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL ~ PEEK, INe. REP. MARIO CONSTANTINI, RE REZONING FROM A-2 TO PUD KNOWN AS LONE OAK EAST OF AIRPCRT ROAD NORTH OF ~INE RIDGE ROAD - ADOPTED WITH STIPULATIONS AND PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT ACCEPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 7, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the elerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-85-30C, filed by Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc. representing Mario eonstantini, requesting a rezone from A-2 to PUD known as Lone Oak for approximately two acres of commercial, and a maximum number of 604 multi-family dwelling units for property located on the east side of Airport Road, approximately one mile north of pine Ridge Road, in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, containing 89.6 acres. Planning/Zoning Director Pettrow stated that lands to the north are zoned PUD (Oran~e Blossom Gardens - residential multi-family) and A-2, and lands to the east are zoned A-2. He noted that land to the south is zone<i PtJD (t'rincess Park - recreational uses) and A-2, and lands to the west of a portion of the subject property are zoned A-2, PUQ, and RO and further west across Airpo~t Road lands are zoned A-2. He reported that the proposed project complies wi th the point system of the eomprehensive Plan and Rllows land designated for ncighborhood Page 3 - - - _.". ·"·"~'··'.~"-"_·"'..·.,h_.··"" ""'" ,'"",,, ~.. ~ - - .. Ma rch 11, 19R6 commcrclal use to serve the regi~cnts of the PUD. He indicated that th~ eollier :ounty Planning Commission held their public hearing February 20, 198~, and un~nimously recommended forwarding this petition to the Roðrd with a recommendation of approval subject to Rt~ff stipulations and with the additional stipulation that the commerical tract of two acres shall he permitted with the provision that the tract shall be ~eavily buffered on the west, south and north boundaries or walled, and the entrance to the commercial tract shall be from the east; signage for the tract shall he determined through Staff review at the time of site plan submittal; and, this tract shall not be developed until the four-laning of Airport Road. He noted that at the Ce?r. meeting, no one spo~e for or aaainst this petition and no correspon- dence has been received. He stated that Staff is recomme~ding approval subject to the sti~ulations. Mr. Alan Reynolds of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc., stated that this project consists of approximately 90 acres and the lakes that are indicated on the /laster Plan are for the most part existing and were excavated for fill material over the years. He stated that this factor has been taken into account when creating the project. He noted that all thc residential units in the project will be laKefront units, adding that the primary access to the project is Airport Road. He noted that the access to Orange Blossom Drive is a secondary access into the project. He reported that indiviñ~al tracts will have driveways to the units and a parking area facing on those driveways, addinq that he will be bringing detailed plans back for Staff review of each individual tract. He noted that the residential units are primarily multi-family with some attached single family or cluster-type units. fie reporter! that there are four major recreational areas with the primary recreational use being the existing 21 acre lake that has fish. He noted that there would be several pools and tennis courts in the recreational areas, so that each phase of the project will have a recreational area close to it. He noted that there will be interconnecting bike paths and sidewalk systems that will be in excess of one mile and will connect all the various tracts to the recreational areas. He noted that this petition was reviewed by WMAB, EAe, Subdivision Review eommitt~e and the ecpc and all recommendations were unanimous. He indicated that all stipulations have been incorporated into the PUD document, thcrefore, the PUD document that has been presented to the Commission is the final one. ðOO~ 092 PAGE 45.4 Page 4 ~OOK 09:2 r¡r.[ '455 Ma rch 11, 1986 eommissioner Pistor qu~stioned what the value of the hou£es would be, to which Mr. Peynold~ stated that they are considererl ~oderate priced housing in the range of S50,000-75,000. Commissioner Voss questioned what will be done about potable water, irrigating water, and sewage, to which Mr. Reynolds stated that the potable water will be provided from the central system that is available, which will be the City system, and a water main is available on the west side of Airport Road. He stated that sewer will he accommodated on-site until there is a plant in the area, adding that Tract "G" is designated for a utility site. eommissioner Voss questioned if this project is approved, how soon would WorK begin? r~r. Reynolds stat~d that the design and permitting process will probahly take about a year before they can start, adding that the development is being coordinated with the four-laninq of Airport Road, which is anticipated to be in place in about a year. He stated that within two years buildings will actually be on the site. Commissioner Voss stated that he would like a stipulation to that effect, adding that if this project is approved, he does not want to see it tyiñg there fo~ five or six yeats before anyone gets around to doing anything. Mr. Reynolds stated that he does not see any problem with that, adding that this type of stipulation has been put on other projects. eommissioner Holland questioned if Orange Rlossom Drive on the west side of Airport Road and the east side of Airport Road align, to which Mr. Reynolds replied negatively, adding that there is an offset that exists at the present ti~e. He noted that the plans for Airport Road shows that this will be accommodated ~y a widened ~edian and a turning lane at the time of four-laning. Mr. Henry Maxant, North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District eommissioner, stated that he is concerned about the technical aspects of fire protection for thi~ project. He stated that he is concerned with the aspects of capital improve~ents needs that will be put on this area which is the 8tation '5 area. He stated that there is not any money available to build this station as the bond money will be exhausted when r,tation '3 is built in the Wiggins Pass area. He stated that they have to plan ahead for the Rtatlon '5 area, which is in the area of the petitioner's project. He stated that on November 11, 1985, the BOiHd of F".re eommissioner3 Rdopted a capital improvement assess- Page 5 - - ... - - .. March 11, 1986 ment resolution where there should be a contribution of $100 per unit and $200 for the first 5,000 squ~re feet of commercial space on PUD's in order to defray the expenses that would be involved by protectinq the ~rea with fire service. He stated that the average cost of a fire station would be around 5700,000. He stated that he wrote a lettor on February 5, 1986, to the repr~s~ntative of the petitioner, a5~ing that they pay the fees as previously indicated. Tape t3 Hr. ~axant noted that the ~titioner gave him a statement that indicated that Lone OaK will be obligated to pay at the time of request for a building p~rmit any and all required impact fees applica~le to the project when such fees are duly and legally adopted, including but not limited to eounty road impa=t fees and fire district impact fees. He staten that he is not sure if this letter covers what he needs. eounty Attorney Saunders stated that he does not believe that there is any legally adopted requirement for the payment of impact fees for fire protection at such ti~e. He stated that if the County eommis- sion adopts an ordinance in the future that ties in to the building permit process, the payment of an impact fee for fire protection, then that developer would be required to paj those impact fees for future building permits. eommissioner Voss Questioned if the developer would agree to pay the impact fees without legally enforcing it? Mr. Bill Barton of wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc. stated that the problem of impact fees for roadways was a concorn for quite some time and there was a great deal of money being extorted from particular projects. He stated that the same prohlem has now come u? with fire protection, adding that it seems totally inappropriate that this project should be singled out simply hecause it is going through a rezoning petition. He noted that other buildings in this area that were rezoned five years ago will not pay their fair share until such time as a legally constituted impact fee for fire districts is established. He stated that he would encourage the Commission, if it is appropriate, to help the fire districts accomplish this goal, adding that in the event that it occurs, this project would pay its fair share. He noted that this project will probably take at least five years to build after it commences. He s~ated that if there is not a fire impact fee in existence in that period of time, then it is not ðppropriatE'. He stated that other means of financing the fire distr ict ~ 092 PAGr '456 Page 6 ,"_ 0"''', ,.,,", _,~ _""~"p.~,..,,_.,..^,'" aoo~ 092 p,.~ '457 March 11, 19P6 may. be more appropriate. Pe stated that as far as tiMefr~Mes are concerned, he has· no oroblem with that, but within those timeframes, there should be eC0nomic cycles taken into consideration. eommissioner ~!ollðnd questioned ho'" far it is frOm I\irpcrt Road and nine Ridge P.oad to the present fire station, to which Mr. Maxant stated that it is 2-1/2 to 3 miles to the proposed project. eommissioner Holland questioned what the furthest area is that is cO',¡ered in the North Naples District, to which Mr. /1axant replied that it is about 7 miles. Mrs. Charlotte Westman, representing the League of Women Voters, referred to Page 32 of the docuMent and questioned why the School Board ùid not answer with regard to overtaxing the facilities? She stated that the build-out of the project indicates thRt it will take 10 years and questioned if this is a firm commitment of the PUD? Planning/Zoning Pirectcr Pettrow stated that once a development permit is pulled on a PUD, there is 6 months to begin conntruction. He staten that once a PUD is approved, there is no start up time reauire~ent nor is there a finish time. Mrs. Westman questioned what will happen to the materials that comes out of the excavation of the proposed lake, to which ~r. ReynOlds stated that the fill material will be u;ed on site. Mr. George Keller, representing the eollier eounty Civic Federation, stated that he does not understand why comMercial has to be used in a nice residential area, adding that this will be a perfect example of strip zoning in the area. eommissioner Voss nuestioned if the developer is willing to contribute $100 per unit that the Fire District has asked for on a voluntary basis, to which Mr. reynolds stated that the applicant indicated that he wouln contribute this. ComMissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. eOMmissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 23 subject to the Petitioner's Agreement; the applicant's contribution to the fire district; that construction begin within three years! and that Staff be directed to align Orange Blossom Drivel Page 7 - - .. ...." "~'·"__~.'·';m.".""~" .eo,.. ,....'''''._.....__.,.'".._'"''-,.......~ .<. "..";_...._,-'"...."_,__"'__""''''-þ....,,~_'._'",,,.,.".A'.,,_.;.,",,..,''............·.,,..,___'c.......,·.,·._. - - - March 11, 1986 Itell .6 ORDINANeE PROVIDING POR LEVY OF TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX _ TO BE REFERRED BAeK TO TDC AND RECONSIDERED IN DECEMBER Legal notice havina been published in the Naples Daily News on February 20, 19R6, as evidencer'! by Affidavit of Publication filed with th~ elcrk, pUhlic hearing was opened to consider the adoption of an ordinance providinq for the levy of a Tourist ~evelopment Tax and for uses of the tax. Mr. Chuck ~~hlKe, re?resenting the Tourist Development eouncil, stated that the value of the visitor industry in Collier County can be documented and demonstrate~. adding that the annual influx of visitors remains an integral and necessary part of the community's growth and economic health. He stater'! that Florida Counties such '.IS Palm ßeach, Browa rd, pi ne 11 as, Lee ant'! ~10nroe have shown the evi dence tha t the levy of a Tourist Development Tax has benefited their residents. Pe stated that it would be necessary to educate a majority of the voters that a non-resiJent tax collected by and spent on behalf of local accommodations, hotels, motels, and short-term rental apartments will benefit all local residents by providing greater year-round job stability for our workers and additional tax revenues because of increased visitor spending. he stated that the concern of the members of the Tourist Development eouncil is that the present climate in eollier eounty is not appropriate to conduct a proper program of informing the residents of the benefits to be derived from the levy of the Tourist Development Tax, therefore, the members of the TDC request that the Board defer consideration of the proposed ordinance providing for the levy of the tax at this time. He stated that the TDe should continue its assessment of the need for the 2~ tourist tax and report any recommendations that it may have on or before December, 1986. Tape .4 The following people spoke in opposition to the Tourist Development Tax citing the facts that there is not a need for advertising and promotion to bring tourists to the area as the County wants controlled growth, concerns regarding communication problems and a need for a bette~ Droposal, desire to nave this tax issue deferred, desire to completely drop the entire tax issue, and no need to tax guests with proceeds goinq to the eounty ~overnrnentl John Van Arsdale ~oward ~. Tuthill Mike Zewalk Phillip Wood Georoe Keller John ¡¡agel Philip Francoeur ðOCK 092 P1Gt 460 Pa<;le 9 .- ..,""..".,""....... '''',-'.'''<''''-- "'~ ~,- ~.",..... mK 092 rA~( '4£31 Mðrch 11, 19R6 Co~missioner Voss ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Com~issioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the proposed ordinance providing for levy of Tourist Development Tax be referred bacK to the TDC to maKe a further detðiled study in areðs where the tax is enforced and brought bðck to the Board to be reconsidered in December. Itelll t7 PETITION V-86-l, DICK CLARK, REP. CIRCLE K CORP. REQUESTING A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NE CORNER OF AIRPORT ROAD AND DOMESTIC AVENUE - DENIED Legal notice hi'lving bef!n publisher! in the Naples Daily tTe..,s on February 16, 1926, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the elerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-AF-l, filed by Dick Clark, representing Circle K eorporation, re~uesting a 13 foot variance fro~ the required front Yðrò setback of 50 feet to 37 feet and a 9.33 foot variance fro~ the required side yard setback of 40 feet to 30.67 feet for automobile service stations, for property located at the northeast ..come!' of Airport Road and Do.testic Avenue. planning/Zoning Director Pettrow stated that the objective of this petition is to construct a convenience store with qðS pumps at less than the required front and side Yi'lrd setbacks, adding that the property contains .65 acres, is rectangular in shape and is presently vacant. He stðted thi'lt because this property fronts on two streets, it is considered to have two front yards, two side yards, and no rear yard. He rerorted that a convenience store with gas pumps is required to meet the same development stðndarda as an auto service station and in this case, the property is zoned C-5, eommercial Industrial and the required side yard setback and front yard setback for a convenience store with gas pumps is 40 feet and 50 feet, respectively. He noted that the petitioner is rf!questing a 9-1/2 foot variance to allow the convenience store to be constructed with a 30.67 foot side yard setback on the northern boun~ary line and a 13 foot variance to allow a 37 foot front yard setback on the southern boundary line. He referred to the executive summary in¿icatino the standards that the Board of Zoning Appeals ~hould consider and be guided by. He indicated that this building could be reoriented and still work on this piece of property without a variance. He noted that Staff recommendation is for denial. Petitioner and/or his representative was not present. Page 10 .. - - "..",.-";..,_..,,"..,,,,,.,,,.,_..,,...,.,..~- .. - .. March 11, 1986 Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Comllissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Petition V-86-l, Dick Clark, representing Circle K eorporation be denied. Item .0 RESOLUTION 86-41 RE PETITION PU-85-4e, ALPINE BROADCASTING EXT~¡DING PROVISIONAL USE TO APRIL 16, 1987 - ADOPTED Plannin0/Zoning Oirector pettrow stateà that Alaine Aroadc~stinq eorporation has received ~ ~rovisional une to conntruct a brondcant radio tower north of Alligator Alley and east of I-75, adding that it was approved but construction has not yet begun. He stated that the petitioner has requested an extension of the provisional use and it is recommendation of Staf! that it be approved. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-41 re Petition PU-85-4C, Alpine Broadcasting Corporation extending provisinnal use to April 16, 1987, be adopted. ðOOK 092 PAGE '462 Page 11 ~ ,.._",.."".,...,,.-,.,,,,, ,'...~."~~~-~" ~OOK 092 Pl~£4G5 Item .9 March 11, 1981', PROPOSED TWO ACRE SITE ON THE SOUTHEAST SECTION OF COURTHOUSE COMPLEX FOR NEW MUSEUM SITE - APPROVED. STAFF OIREeTED TO PREPARE NECESSARY LEGAL DOeUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF NEW SITE AND THE PLANNED MOVE OF THE eURRENT BUILDING BY THE MUSEUM SUPPORT GROUPR Deputy ^ssistant eounty ~":ilnðger ßran<;lðccio stated that in Cecember, 19R4, a drive was started to build a wing on the current museum building, adding that at the time, the 90ard committed to moving the Election trailer, which is presently located on that site. She stated that since that time, the eounty Mana~er's office and the museum support groups have looked at the alternatives of locating a new site for a ~useum on the comrlex. She stated that it has been agrced upon a two acre site on the southeast section of the courthouse complex. She st3ted that the museum groups have currently raised $100,000 and have connitments for more money when the Hoard makes their decision. She stated that the mUScum groups are also requesting that the site construction he handled in the same way that it was handled in the current building, in that the supporter& handle the construction and turn the project over to the County at the time that the construction is completed. 'She stated that th~ County Mana~er's office has no objection to this plan and supports the new site for the museum building. She reported that the legal attorney, staff, and real estate property office will have to prepare the necessary documents. The fOllowing people spoke in favor of the museum site and construction: enarles Price Donald Flock Tape .5 Gerald Lanterman eo~missioner Goodnight stated that this is a real step forward for the historical aspects of eollier eounty. Coml'dssioner Holland questioned if there are that many legal documents that have to be prepared before this building can be moved, to which County Attorney Saunders stated that he did not think that the docu~ents are goin~ to be thilt complex or tRke that long to work out, but he would have to do so~e research on the matter. I\ssistant !:'eputy eounty ~lanaC1er Brangaccio stated that there have been estimates on movina the building, adding that the museum groups are going to try and get a moving organization to donate their services to move the building. eommissioner Holland auestioned if some of the permit fees could Page 12 - - .. .. .. - March 11. 19R6 be waived for this buildinJ, to which eounty ~anager Lusk replied affirmatively. eo~missioner Voss ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the proposed 2 acre site on the southeast section of the eourthouse eomplex for the new museum site be approved and Staff be directed to prepare the necessary legal documents in support of the new site and the planned move of the current building by the museum support groups. Item t 10 STAFF AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED TO IMPLEMENT THE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WITH THE DAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL CENTER. SAMPLE POLICY STATEMENT FOR DIVISIONAL eOUNTY EMPLOYEES - ENDORSED Deputy Assistant eounty ~~na~er nran1ðccio stated that th,! eounty Manag~r' s staff has been working '..ith the f'avid Lawrence ¡!'ental Health eenter and Mr. Ron ~eserve with regards to a Policy Statement concernina an Emplo~ee ~ssistance ~rogram. Me. Pon ~leserve. representing the Davi,] L3wrence ~lental Health eenter, pre3ented a slide presentation on an employee assistance prograo. 'Ie stated that through this progran, the services will be provided to all the eounty employees an~ their families at no charge to the county or the eoployees. Deputy Assistant eounty ~anager Brangaccio stated that ~taff is asking the Board to endorse the concept of the program, authorize Staff to implement it, and approve the Policy State~ent. She stated that Staff is very supportive of the program and it deserves the chance, adding that the pilot program will go for a year and if the results are there, they will come back and possibly ask for future funding on a permanent basis. Mr. Meserve stated that they are prepared to have the program operational within the next 30 days. Ms. Arangaccio stated that the Counselor does not provide treatment for an employee, but refers the employee to the right person for their particular problem. She indicated that records will be kept to determine if the program is proven. Mr. Meserve stated that it is RS much as service to the enployer as it is to the employee and the family. eommissioner Yolla~~ questioned if t~e County hospitalization would cover this, to which Mr. Me&erve stated that the ~mployee Assistance °ro?ra~ is the opportunity for the employee to come to the ðOO< 092p.lGI466 Page 13 092pl~[4ß7 !-larch 11, 19116 cOlln5elor to receive assistance in determininq if there is a ~roblem and the extent of that problem, and if the inðividual nced5 to be rcferred on to more intensive long-term treatment, then the County insurance wOllld cover the majority of the cost of that service. In answer to eommis5ioner Holland, Mrs. Brangaccio stated that employees could ask for assistance or the supervisors could defer emplcyecs to the program. Tape .6 bOO~ Mr. William Barton of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SoIl & Peek, Inc., stated that some engineering firms have implemented this type of progra~ and the benefits derived from such a program were amazing. He stated that his fir~ is considering instituting such a program. eommissioner V?SS moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Staff be authorized to proceed to implement the Employee Assistance Program with the David Lawrence Mental Health eenter and that the sample Policy Statement for Divisional County Employees be endorsed. Page 14 .. - - the &COK 092 Plr,[ 469 Item III . March 11, 1986 WORKSHOP TO BE SCHEDUL~D WITH eepc, STAPF AND COMMISSION RE POLICY OF eONTHlUING ITEMS Planning/Zoning rirector Pettrow stated that this is a request to set a policy for continuance of rezone, provisional use, variance, amendments to PUD's an~ the 7.oning Ordinance and other similar petitions. He noted that there has been some confusion concerning the various circumstances causing the re~uest for the Board to continue petitions. f!e noted that Staff is recommending the procedures as outlined in the Executive Summary with regard to automatic continua- tions. He reported that if a petition is continued, no backup will be provided for the agenda packet and Staff will submit a memo explaining the reason for the continuation. He reported that the public will r.now that the petition is being continued to a certain day because the agenda will indic~te same. He indicat~d that if the Petitioner wishes to request a continuation of a petition which is complete and all issues resolved, Staff will provide the backup for the agenda pac~ets along Hith the petitioner's request for continuation and the request for continuance will not he on the "agenda but will be decided by the Board at the public hearing. He stated that for PUD amendments, advertising is not done until after the cepc meeting because the ordinance that is advertised is not in final form until after the ecpe hearing. He reported that in no case can a petition be continued for more than 5 weeks without readvertisemen~. eommissioner ristor stated that they could wait until everything is completed, hefore the advertisement is put in the paper for the Board public hearinq. Com~issione:' Holland stated that he would like see a worr.shop on this matter with the members of the eepe, the Staff and the Board. He stated that he feels that the ecre should definitely have input on this matter. eommissioner Pistor directed Staff to schedule a worKshop with the eepe, the Staff, and the C~mmisBion after March 20, 1986. Mr. Bill ~arton stated that everyone is concerned ahout this issue, adding that one thought he has had is the possibility of having two different dates of advertising, one to advertise concurrently as it is being done now and the other is to separate the advertisements and let the applicant make the decision. He stated that if there is a rAzone petition that the applicant expects no problem with, then he Page 15 - - .. ,.. ~_.~"'-"""-".''''''''.'.''''.''''''"'''''~'''''''''''"'- ..._·....11 - - - l~arch 11, 1986 Itelll U3 DIseUSSION OF CHANGE TO EXOTIC fISH ORDINANCE - REQUEST TO RAISE BLUE TALAPIA IN eOLLIER eoUNTY - DENIED Dr. Proffitt stRted that this item has h~en discussed several times at v~rious m~etingR and the general cons~nsus of 5taff is that talania fish fðr~s not h~ allow~1 ~nd the e~otic fish ordinance not he chan< erJ. Dr. Henningsen sUMmarized th~ òiscussion from th~ previous ~ublic hearings, workshops, communications, and telephone interviews, indicating that as part of ~taff ~e is also against allowing talaria in eo11ier eounty. Commissioner Voss stateò that the discussion should be whether the talapia will be able to escape from this fish farm or not. Dr. Henningsen stated that if fish farming is allowed within the eounty, fish will he introduced within the local watershed within a short period of ti~e. Tape .7 Mr. Kevin Dugan stated that he is reauesting that he be allowed to grow tilapia. He stated that the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission is empowered by the State t~ control the import and use of fish as well as other types of wildlife, adding that he feels that there is conflict between and State and County laws. He stated that three of the four fish in the exotic fish ordinance are &lready within the eounty waters. He noted that with his facility, escapement of tilapia is virtually escape-proof. He stated that his facility is capable of raisinq a million pounds of fish per year and they would like to be ahle to build this facility and grow talapia. He stated that he would like to be able to òo this within Collier eounty as it is much better suited to support this type of venture. eommissioner Holland stated that he can see the need now and in the future for food production, and with what is proposed he does not see that there is much opportunity for the fish to escape. eommissioner Voss questic·ned if this fish farm would be able to raise tilapia without letting anyone else do the same? County Attorney Saunders stated that if this petition is approved, it would have to be permitted for any other similar type situation. He stated that there could be restrictions as to what tYDe of technology they use. eommissioner Voss stated that he does not feel that ~here is much chance of the fish qettina out and it seems to be a worthwhile venture. ~OOK 092 pm 472 Page 17 m~ 092p~':,ft\73 r~arch 11, 1986 eonmissioner Hasse stated that if there ôre fish in the .~/aters then they came from these farms and if it is permitted in Collier eounty, the talapia will end up in the waters of eollier County. eommissioner Goodniaht stated that she is not sure that this i~ something that needs to be allowed in Collier eounty at this time. Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried 3/2, (eommissioners Voss and Holland opposed) that the raising of blue talapia in Collier County be denied. ***** Recess: 12:25 P.M. - Reconvened: 1:30 P.M. ***** Item 114 BID '86-934 FOR LINER MATERIAL AT NAPLES LANDFILL TO GUNDLE LINER eONSTRUeTION, INe. AT A eOST OF ~418,652 - APPROVED Legal notice havin~ been published in the Naples Daily News on January 17, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the elerk, bids were received for Bid ~86-934 for liner material at the Naples Landfill until 2:30 P.M., February 5, 19ßfÕ. Public Works Administrator Kuc~ stated that this is to award a contract for the purchase and installation of hi~h density polyethylene liner cover material and related irlstal'ation material for the Naples Landfill. He stated that the purchase of these materials i3 necessary in order to construct a new cell at the Naples Landfill as the DER requires that all cells be constructed with a liner to eliminate leachate contamination of the groundwater. He noted that bids range from $4l8,fÕ52 to $613,559 and Gundle Lining Construction, Inc. was the low bidder for the material and installation. H~ stated that the cost of 5418,652 will be paid out of the 1985-86 budget and the recommenda- tion is that the bid be awarded to Gundle Liner eonstruction, Inc. In answer to COMmissioner Voss, Public works Administrator KUCK stated th~t the liner is 60 mills and is heavier than what DER requires. In answer to Commissioner Holland, Mr. Kuck indicated that this liner will take care of a 25 acre site, which will extend the life to about 12 years when the resource recovery plant is in operation. Commitsioner 'loss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Bid 86-934 for liner material at Naplcs Landfill be awarded to Gundle Liner Construction, Inc. in the amount of $418,652. Page 18 - - - ""','"-,...".__._. - - - March 11, 1986 Itell t16 CANeELLATION OF CURRENT LE~SE WITH FLORIDA ~EROLIGHTS, INC. AT IMMorALEE AIRPORT - ~PPROVED. CURRENT VIOLATIONS TO BE CORRECTED AND ALL INSURANeE REQUIREMENTS MET. STAPF DIRECTED TO NEGOTIATE NEW LEASE WITHIN 60 DAYS - APPROVED Public Wor~s ~dministrator Kuck stated that the objective of this iten is to c~ncp.l the lease of November 13, 19n4, with Florida Aerolight, Inc. on the west sirJe of the Immo1<alee Airport. He stated that Florida Aeroli,ht, Inc. leased 1.28 acr~s from the Board on Cecember 1, 1901 and in the original agreement with the eounty, they were to operate an ultralight flight traininq school and flying club. He stated that due to rapid business growth, the leasehold presently occupied can no longer accommodate the offices, plane storaqc, and adequate parking necessary for patrons and sightseers attracted to the operation. He reported that Florida Aerolights, Inc. has been constructing facilities which are unacceptable to the buildina and zoninq standards, which technically result in a default of the present lease. fie stated that Building and Zon'ng has red-tagged and placed a cease and òesist notice on all work presently being performed and Florida Aerolights has reou~sted that Staff approve the present site improvements and approve plans to allow further development of the leasehold. He reported that Staff finds the present and future plan unaccpetable and in violation of the agreement with the County. Tape .8 Public WorKs Administrator KUCK noted that the five lease violations are contained in the Executive Summary and that all of the lease violations have been reviewed by the Assistant County Attorney and the eounty's Risk Management Director. He noted that they have approved the recommendation to terminate the present lease. P.e reported that Staff finds the present site plan submitted by Florida Aerolights, Inc., on January 30, 1986, for Lot 14, unacceptable because it does not provide for adequate parking, ground space and the proper margin safety required for an operation of its present scope. He stated that it is ~taff recommendation that the Florida Aerolights, Inc. site plan submitted January 30, 1986, be denied and that Staff be directed to cancel the lease with Florida Aerolights, Inc. at its present site based on their violations of the lease provisions. Mr. Robert Kuhn stated that this is not a good situation as he has a lot of money invcsteè at the Immokalee Airport. He n0ted that the origin~l lease with the County was not thoroughly done. Pe reported ðODK 092 Pl>£ '476 Page 20 -.' ___.."',...<w....~,·_"',.~,,""'" ."'",,,_,.,.."'_...... -'-"~""" a-;; 092 PA~[ 4 TI that as far ftS code violations, he can make the necessary improvements March 11, l'1P¡; to bring the:n up to the proper reauireMents. He stated that another lease should be "ritten and he would like the opportunity to sit down with the eounty Attorney to discuss the matter. He noted that all of the violations are not accurate and with the Master Plan underway for the Immokalee Airport, there is confusion. He stated that the airport belongs to the people and with this flying club, the people are really enjoying it. He stated tnat all his buildings are portable in nature and Ci!!n be removed easily, adding that he would like to have the ~rhole matt~r reviewed to COMe up with a satisfactory lease and solution. Risk Manager Rynders stated that the issue at hand is the fact that the lease is being violated at the present time, and Staff is looking to terminate that lease. She stated that if the ßoôrd should choose to renegotiate a lease with Mr. Kuhn, her recommendation would be tl,at it be done in a different area of the airport because of the nature of the operRtio~ that is there. She stated that he is located in an area at the end of the clear zone of one of the main runways that is currently being used for all types of air traffic, addinq that his operation includes ultralights, parachuting, gyrocopters, etc. which would be better situated ln a separRte area of the airport. She noted that there is an area "here there is a limestone based road which would accommodate the type of auto~obile traffic that is coming in and out of the operation, adding that it is tearing up a lot of the areas that the people in the planes taxi around in. She noted that in the area that she is referring to there would not be the safety hazards that are being encountered õt the present time with the small craft that are flying in and around the acea of the clear zone. Mr. Ric1< Reinek~, Peal Property l~ana9'er, stated that he has spoken with ~1r. Kuhn many times about the operation and nothing was improved. He stated that the Soard approved a one year permit to allow ~r. Kuhn to operate out of a small travel trailer, which expired in Ðecember. He noteà that during that time, he was supposed to have found more perManent quarters. He reported that Mr. Kuhn was given a lease to review and Mð1<e comments on in recemher, 1984, which was a standard lease that is used by everyone at the Airport. He stated that the first violation under hrticle 5 is that written approval is to be submitted to the Staff regarding permission to plRce buildinas. He stated that in order to build at the airpûrt, a building permit must be received, adding that the airport is zoned industrial and the require- Page 21 - - - --.,.-.-.,.-.......-- - - - 1~arch 11, 19A~ ment under that zoning is th^t the building b~ flame r~t^r~ant. He sta ted th,'t 1~r. Kuhn is construct ill') bui Id inqs th'.lt Rre highly fla~m~ble ðn~ h~ is oreratino out of '.I ~obile hom~ that has no fire protection aroun~ it. fie stated that the skydiving cluh is operating in ^n area that is amonq power poles and within the clear zones provided for two runways. He stated that another iteM that is of major concern is the fact that ~r. Kuhn has been actinq as an authority at the airport desi~nating traffic patterns for people to follow, addinq that the FAA set asi~e certain areas in their plan for aircraft to fly and clear zones. He stated that no one can override the decisions made by the FAA. He stated that sky~ivers are landing in the clear zones, which is a major conc~rn. He reported that Staff feels that the lease as written and understood by r1r. Kuhn is not being complied wi th and it is grounds for termination of the lease. He reporte~ that when Mr. Kuhn signed the lease, it was ;x>int'Õ!d OL.t to hi!'! that he must cOMply with the building and zoning. eOMmissioner Goodnight stated that there have been complaints made and people in Immokalee are very concerned that the skydivers are in a zone that is supposed to be a saf~ zone. She stat~d that the people do not want to see r~r. Kuhn leave the airport, but they would like to relocate him to where the sport aviation would not interfere with the planes and helicopters that come and go fro~ the airport. Mr. Reineke stated that he h^s been receiving numerous complai~ts from other pilots that have landed at Naples and question who is running the airport in Im!'!okalee and why they had close encounters with ultralights. He stated that his primary issue with Mr~ Kuhn is the placement of the skydivers in an area that was not designated or laid out to handle skydivers and also the issue of zoning and building violations. ~e noted that there were two small hangars that were built without a building permit. Mr. Kuhn stated that this is a small operation and there are only about 9 airplanes at the airport and there was some traffic on the ground and in the air and in the interest of safety, he drew up a plan for the club members by changing a few directions of traffic. ComMissioner Voss stated that Staff lists five violations of the lease and questioned if Mr. Kuhn violated Article 5 of the lease, to which Mr. Kuhn stated that he did not submit a formal written notice for ~ircraft hangars 25' by 40' and 40' by 40'. eommissioner Voss auestioned if Mr. Kuhn violated the second ~OOK 092 PA~[ 478 Page 22 aOCl 092 PAC.f4 79 Ma rch 11, 1986 violation, to which I~r. Kuhn stateu that he did not get building permits for the hanqars. ~r. Kuhn state~, with reference to Article 7, he did not sublcase the trailer, adding that he simply moved the trailer temporarily. r.ommissioner Voss auestioned if Mr. Kuhn covers the eounty with regards to the insurance, to which Risk Manager Pynders stated that the insurance does not cover skydiving. Hr. Kuhn stðt~d that the skydiving is a different issue, adding that the Corporation h3s what the County needs for insurance. Mr. Kuhn stated that these men ar~ professional skydivers and they all have public liability insurance. eommissioner Voss stated that the question is whether the County is covered. adding that if they are injured he does not wan~ them suing the eounty. He stated that there are five violations of the lease agreement. Tape '9 Mr. Kuhn stated that it was not a good lease to begin with, whether it was violated or not. eommissioner Hasse questioned if Uere is a place at the airport that Mr. Kuhn could lease so that he could safely conduct ~n operation if he adheres to the eounty's rules and regulations, to which Ms. Rynders rcplied affirmatively. Mr. Reineke gave the general location of Mr. Kuhn's pre$ent operation at the airport and also indicated the area that would be better for his operation. eounty ^ttorney Saunders stated that it seems that everyone has agreed that there are problems with the operation, but there is a way to work this out and the way to do that is for Mr. Kuhn to meet with Staff and move his operation to an area that is acceptable. He stated that he would suggest that the lease be terminated for violations, but that Staff be directed to n~et with Hr. Kuhn to see if another arrange- ment could be worr.ed out on another part of the airport. Mr. Kuhn stated that where he is at the airport on Lot 14, is okay until the Master Plan comes through. He stated that he is willing to corrcct any errors that he has made. ~e noted that the area that Staff is discussing is nice, but it is not available for flying into because there are drainage ditches and it is rough. He stated that it could be six months or so for this area to be put :nto shape before it can be used and in the meantime, he needs to run his business. He sttted that Page 23 - - - -----<'---- .. - - March 11, 1986 if this 'was ~n improved strip, h~ would not ohject to it. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she would like to accept Staff recommendations and then send Mr. Kuhn hack to Mr. Reineke and have Mr. R~ineke com~ up with ~ n~w leas~ ~nd t~lk to th~ people at the ~irport that are preparing the ~aster Plan. check the locations out there ~nd find a location that ~Iould b~ suitable for him. Commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Vosa and carried 4/1, (Commissioner Holland opposed), that the current lease with Florida Aerolights, Inc. at Immokalee Airport be cancelled and that the current violations be corrected and all insurance requirements be met immediately and Staff be directed to negotiate a new lease within 60 day.. Itell U 7 PIVE YEAR AND TEN YEAR SECONDARY ROAD PROGRAM PRIORITIES - APPROVED Transportation Director Archibald stated this item is to approve th~ updated five-year seconòdry road program. He noted that attached to the Executive Summary is a list of the major road construction projects, the major traffic signal improvements and the major road resurfacing projects. He noted that the number of projects on the five year work plan has not been changed but the priorities have been updated ~s a result of worK that has been completed and work that is being planned. He stated that in the current year, there are a number of contracts being planned. adding the most important is the extension of Airport Road from Cougar Drive north to Immokalee Road which is 4 miles of construction with an estimated cost of $3.3 million and a one year timeframe beginning in May, 1986. He stated that another major project is the extension of pine Ridge Road from 1-75 to e.R. 951 which is a 3 mile project that will be a four-laned rural section with the estimated cost being $2.2 million and a timeframe of 9 months beginning in Mayor June of 1986. He noted that there is a major road recon- struction plan for Golden Gate Blvd. from Wilson Blvd. eastward. He noted that the last major jOb in the current ye~r will be the extension of Santa Barbara Blvd. from Radio Road to Davis Blvd. and as part of that project, there will be a four-lane segment of Davis Blvd. He noted that the other priorities set forth in the five year work plan remain essentially the same. He noted that in the upcoming year, he has added a few signal projects. He stated that for the first time this year, he is projPctinq beyond the five year timefrJrne and included in the Executive Summarv is a 10 year work plan that shows a rough :;; 092 FAr·f 480 Page 24 '"~ ~-'",.,..,._._-","",.,_._.."". . .. .-"__"~'_"""'~""""'''''''_'''---,.,,*, ....._~ .............--,,,....."''''''''''-.--,,,,''.,,...,,..,...,.,......,..,,....'''..,,...,....--.-_......_-~>--- ,'. . ' . .,/'!", ' t..- ,,'. . ). . " . . .. - .. March 11, 1')06 Ite. .21 EXPENSES RELATED TO BOND ISSUE - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Fiscal Officer Giles indicated that this concerns bills relatinq to bond issues invo1vinq the s~les tax refundino issue of May 31, 1985 and Ðecember 31, 1985, 524,240,000 Water-Sewer Issue and the $88,000,000 Solid Waste Pevenue Bonds. Tape no County Attorney Saunders stated that wit~ regards to the bill from Southeastern ~unicipal P~nds, the Commission may want to wait a while before approvino this bill. He stated that he spoke with ~ary ~kers and it is his opinion that the correct aMount is 559,115.60 and it is the County's position that the correct amount is 546,990. He stated that Mr. Akers is sending some backup material to justify the increased a~ount and it might be adv~Bable to hold off on that bill until that .aterial is received. Fiscal Officer Giles stated that the 546,990 has to do with the .tandard Florida Security Dealers Association scale and it is less than Southeastern ~unicipal Bonds understands its contract to be, ~ddin9 that he felt in good faith that the County should advance what is due and then discuss the difference with them. County Attorney Saunders stated that as long as the Commission understands that there is a dispute over $13,000 and the payment of the $46,000 would not be an acknowledgement or reco~nition that there would not be additional ~~ney owed as there may, in fact, be additional money owed. eo.missioner Voss Daved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unaniaou.ly, that the expenses related to bond i..ues be approved a. pre.ented. Ite. .22 JERRY STONE APPOINTED TO TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL POR THE ØZMAINDER or MR. HAWKINS' TERM, EXPIRING 4/19/89 - APPROVED Commissioner Voss Daved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Jerry Stone be appointed to the Tourist Development Council for the remainder of ~r. Hawkins' term expiring 4/19/89. 800II 092"A"[ 482 Page 26 .'" ItePï2P92 'A~.r '483 March 11, 1986 COMMISSIONERS GOODNIGHT AND HASSE TO ATTEND THE 8TH ANNUAL NI'TIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE IN HOUSTON, TEXAS, APRIL 16-18, 1986 - APPROVED Commissioner Voss .eved, seconded by COllmis.ioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Commissioner. Goodnight and Hasse attend the 8th Annual National Conterence in Hou.ton. Texas, on April 16-18, 1986. It.. .24 BOI'RD OP COUNTY COHMISS!ONERS TO BE ON VI'CATION JUNE 24, JULY I, JULY 8, AND JULY 15. FIRST BUDGET WORKSHOP TO BE HELD ON JULY 23, 1986. Co.~issioner Pis tor stated that he would make a suggestion that due to the NACCO conference in July, that there be no meetings on June 24, July 1, July 8, and July 15. Budget Director Zal~a stated that the budget is due on July 15, 1986, whether the Co~mission is present or not, adding that she will be turning the budget in and it will be available to anyone that wants to review it. In answer to Ms. Zalka, Commissioner Pistor stated that there could be a Budget \"1orkshop July 23, 1986, "fhich would give the Co~mission one weck to deciðc on the ~aximuM tax increase that goes out on the notice to all taxpayers. She stated that this would mean an overall review of the entire budget in one week. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that there be no Commi.sion meetings on June 24, July 1, July 8, and July 15. It.. .25 UPOR'l' ON CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AT COUNTY COMPLEX Commissioner Pistor stated that Building "A" is where the courtrooms are now and while the new courthouse is being built those courtrooms will stay there and there will be other related functions in Building "A". He noled that the first and second floors are to be slightly renovated for court-related functions and the courts will occupy these facilities for ~rproximately 24 months while the new courthouse is beins con6tructed. He stated thðt the bulk of the renovation will occur after the completion of the new courthouse. He stated with reference to Building "B", whlch is where the Health Department is at present, will house the Health Department while the new Health Building is being constructed which should be finished within 24 months. He stated that when the Health Department leaves Page 27 ',.: - - - P" " . . . ¡ , . t ' " , '.c, .. - - "'arch 11, 19~6 BUildin9 "8", the structure will be renovated to house the Roardroom and the Commission Offices. He stated that th~ Commission will be lIoved off the third floor of Building "FH into Ruilding "A". He stated that Building "C" is where the Tax Collector is and the int~rior will be renovated and completed, hopefully by 1987, and it will have a new wing added between ~uilding "F" and Builñing "C" for the Property Appraiser with completion by Octoher 15, 1986. ~e stated that Buildinq "D" is where the Public Works Cepartment is ðnri will be housed by the Public Works Division and will have interior renovations only with a completion date of October 15, 1986. He stated that the first floor of Building "FH will be occupied by the Utilities Division, the Elections Office, and the Depart~ent of Emergency Management. He noted that the second floord of Building "F" is the Clerk's offices ðnd will remain unchanged. He stated that with regard to the third floor of Building "F", there will be minimal interior changes only. He stated that this would remain bascially unchanged until the eommission moved to the old Health Building and then the Commission Boardroom will become a conference room or classroom. He reporteò that the fourth floor of Building "F," which is the Clerk's office, will remain unchanged and the fifth floor will be occupied by the Par~s & Pecreation ~epartment in space previously ut ilized by the Planning Department with some renovations. He stated that the Clerk of the 130l\rd will receive additional space, adding that he wants to emphasize that all of this is the way that it is being looked at this date, but there is also some thought being considered to moving the Clerk of the Board's ooeration from the fifth floor to Building "D" when the Commission moves because they handle the recording of the minutes of the meeting and keep the records, He stated that the Public Services Administration will occupy the area formerly used by the Utilities Division with some partitioning and upgrading. He stated that the sixth and seventh floor of Building "F" will remain unchanged and the 8th floor will have t~e Planning and Community Development Department. He stated that this floor will also be finished off temporarily to house the Public Wor~s Division while Building "D" is being renovated and then it will be completed for its final occupants. He stated that the Planning Department will then move into the space along with Vatural Resources, Water Pollution' Control, Budget Office and Risk ~anagement Departments. He stated that Building "G", the Satellit~ Building, where Parks ~ Recreation is located will be occupied by the Ruilding and Zonin~ Departments. He stated that &O~ 092PAé-! 484 Page 28 I ¡ j I lOOK 092Ð'J.485 March 11, 19R6 BU~lding "W", is the new w~r~house bUilding thðt will be COMpleted by September, 1986, and will house the Department of FAcilities r~anagement and the Purchasing Department as well as storage of other material. He reported that the new Health euilding and its related functions along with Social Services will be constructed beyond the jail and it is expected that it will ta~e approximately 24 months to build. He stated that the new courthouse and its relateð functions will be in-between Building "A" and P.uildinq "D" and curve around and be located on part of the land where the old jail is. He stated that the old jail will be torn down after the ~aintenance department moves into the new ware- house. He stated that the I~moka1ee Stockade, which is occupied ~y the Sheriff's office, will have an eMergency generator in the facility as required by the Depart~ent of Corrections. He stated that there is discussion about putting a ~ini~um security stockade in Naples adjacent to the present jail on the west side of the jail which will be A,OOO sq. ft. with two stories for work relea~e and weekend offenders. Chairman Pistor stated that the construction and administration COst will be approximately ~468,827; Building "A" has a budget of Sl.e million with the cost of renovation being approxim"tely 51.5 which will leave a surplus of approximately 52R2,OOO; Building "0" has a budget of 5275,000 for renovation; Buildina "e" has a budget of 51.1 million with the cost of renovation and the new bUilding beina 51.3 million which is a $200,000 shortage; Building "D" has a budget of $330,000 with a cost of 5600,000 which leaves a shortage of $270,000; Building "F", Sth Floor has a budget of $674,300 which is what will have to be spent; Building "G" has a budget of 5231,000 which is the expected cost of renovations. He stated that the new Health Building has a current budget of 51.1 million and the Board is hoping that the Leaislature will appropriate at least 51 ~il1ion for that building so that the complete building CAn be built which will cost ðpproximately $2.1 million. He noted that the ne..' courthouse building is estimated to cost approximately $5 million which is money that is goina to have to Come from the new bond issue. He indicated that the asbestos removal in Building "^" will cost approximately 5151,000 and there is 5182,000 in the budget. He note~ thet the Immokalee ~tockade will cost approximately 5150,000 and there is only ~lO,OOO in the budget which means a shortage of 5140,000. ~e indicated that the old jail has a budget of 5275,000 and the estimated cost of tearing it down will cost approximately $70,000 which leaves a surplus of $205,000; the warehouse Page 29 .. - - ", !1' . ,. . .. , , .. .. .. ~'arch 11, lC 81i is estimated to COAt ~3R5,000 which is what has been budgeted; and furniture and equipment has been bu~~p.te~ at S12,OOO. He stated that the ~eneral improvements for re-roofing Buildings "A", "R", "C", and "D" will cost approximately S160,000 ~nd there is no money allocated in the budget f~r that. He indic~ted that the Naples ~iniMum Security Stockade will cost aoproximately $600,000 an~ there has not been any Jnoney allocated for this either. He reported that there is a1)out $332,000 in the bud~et for reserves ~nd there should be about Sl.3 ~illion which means that there is a shorta~e of about ~l million. He referred to a list of revenues indicating that the eapital Improvements shows $750,000 from Federal Revenue ~harinq, but it is not likely that this will be received froM the Government next year as it rntlY be cancelled, but if it is received this year, that money will be available because it was all to be put in the eapital Improvements budget. He noted that there is $70,000 available from Carry Forward and interest and additional interest exoectcd is $264,000. He stated that in bond proceeds, there is S32l,000; there is a carry forward of $2.6 million and the interest on that woul~ be $470,000; bond proceeds from additional money that will be obtained is $3.6 million and the new bond proceeds will he $3.4 million and the new interest income will be $380,000. He stated tnat the total revenue is $11 million and there is a shortage of $4 Million. He stated that the money for the renovations of Building "A" is not needed at the present time, and the $1 million for the 2nd floor of the new Health Buildin~, hopefully, will come from the Legislature this year and the unfunded portion of the Naples Stockade is 5582,000 which makes a total of $3.1 million. He stated that he hopes Some of the projects will come in under the estimated amount which will help with regards to the needed money. IIe stated that there is also 1/10 of a mill in the budget for capital improvements and if it becomes necessary, all that money will be allocated for these capital improvement projects for the time being, Itea .26 REPORT ON COMMISSIONER GOODNIGHT'S TRIP TO WASHINGTON Commissioner Goodnight stated that she went to the Legislative Conference for the National Association of eounties at the end of February. She stated that she was servinq on two committees and there were several resolutions that the Housinq Committee aðopted. She reported that there were no resolutions that the Agricultural Committee did because it is a new comMittee and they will meet again at the WIR HOI( 002rA'.! 486 Page 30 .. ,,' (..... , ~ ~ ~... ' . " i' , . . 092 .187 H.Hch 11, 19P.6 H~ mt'i in April and at the 'ational Conference in July. <;he stated 'that the number one issue was revenue sharing ðnd the majority of the County COMmissioners that were there agreed with revenue sharing and the fact that Graham-Ruddman-Ho1lins is going to cause a significant strain on human services. He stated that if revenue sharing is continued the cut. from Graham-Ruddman-Hollins could be ta~en and applied with revenue sharing so that human services would not have to he cut in the county. She stated that sc~e programs that are not going to be cut are the WIC program and Social Security as well as others. ***** Commissioner Voss DOve1, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the following items under the consent Agenda be approved and/or adoptedJ ***** Ite. '27 LAKE TRAPl"ORD MEMORIAL GARDENS CEMETERY DEEDS 445, 448 and 449 See Pages ~~~- ~94t It.. '28 RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN RICHARD L. SCHWARTZ, MARTIN S. ADLER, HERBERT GARIL AND MARVIN I. MYERSON RE THE WIDENING OP S.R. 951 See Pagu iJ'15- Ijqr Ite. .29 RIGHT-oP-WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN EDWARD L. CONNOLY JR. POR PORT AU PRINCE DRIVE Se. Pages 1j.C? J' -50 / It.. .30 CANCELLATION OP LEASE WITH U.S. POSTAL SERVICE FOR FORMER MARC", ISLAND SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION See Page .so~ It.. '31 APPOINTMENT OF CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE THE PROPOSALS TO CONDUCT A STUDY POR BEACH RENOURISHMENT TOm Kuck, Public Work. Administrator/County Engineer Harold HUber, Engineering Director Dr. Ed Proffitt, Natural Resource. Management Director Pam Brangaccio, Deputy Assistant County Manager Page 31 .. - - , . k . .' . " . .' .' .. .. .. It.. '32 ACCEPTANCE OF COMPL!T!:D CONSTRUCTION OF KELLY ROAr" IMPROVEMENTS (BAYSRORE DRIVE) FROM U.S. 41 TO THOMASSON DR. RE BID '738 It.. .33 BID .941, JACK' BORE FOR MARCO ISLAND MEDIAN IRRIGATION AWARDED TO J , R CALBE CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN AMOUNT OF $24,217.50 March 11, 1986 Legal notice having been published in the naples Daily News on February 17, 1986, as evidencert by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received for ijid A94l, Jack ~ ijore for I~rco Island Median Irrigation until 2% 3(\ ".H., '~arch 3, 1996. It.. .34 ACCEPTANCE OF WCOOMERE LA.KES WATER FACILITIES O.R. Boo~ 1183, Pages 1050 through 1057 1. The legal docu"ents are found to be legally sufficient by the County Attorney. Ite. .35 AGREEMENT WITH CORPORATE SOOARl!: SUBDIVISION REGARDING INTERIM ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES See Pagu So:3 -..5// It.. .36 GRANT ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION FOR SEWER TREATMENT AND COLLECTION PROJECTS It.. 137 ESTABLISHMENT OF PROPER BUDGET AMOUNTS FOR TRANSFER TO TAX COLLECTOR IN THREE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS It.. 138 DIRECT CLAIM HANDLING TO GULP LIPE paR GROUP MEDICAL IlITSURAJifCE CLAIMS It.. .39 CERTIFICATES FOR CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLL 1984 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY N08. 1984-151/152 1985 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY No.. 1985-134/135 Dated 2/28/86 Dat.d 2/25-28/86 UOK 092 PAf,E 488 I?ac¡e 32 "1a rch 11, 1986 ... 092,ar.t489 1985 Tn Roll Nos. 151-157 Dated 2/19-26/86 Ite. .40 EXTRA GAIN TIME FOR INMATE NOS. 1098 AND 48179 It.. .41 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE PILED AND/OR REPERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that the fOllowing miscellaneous correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various ðepartments as indicateð below: 1. Notice of Assiqnment an~ Order received March 3, 198~ from Division of ^dministra~ive Hearings re Petitioner, ~~RPC and Respondent, BCC, Case No. 86-0610. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. 2. Letter dated 2/19/86 from Pichard F. Barrett, Director, Department of Community Affairs, informing that our community's Housing Application did not compete successfully in the scoring against the other 57 Housing applications, and attaching CDBG Housing Scores. Referred to Pa~ Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. 3. Letter dated 2/24/86 from Dou9las L. Fry, Environmental Supervisor, CER, enclosing short form application (File Nos. 1111611115, 1111629A5, and 11115g565) which involves dredge and fill activities. Referred to Vickie MUllins, Cr. Proffitt and filed. 4. Letter dated 2/27/86 from reborah L. White, Environmental Specialist, DE~, enclosing standard form application (File No. 111164569, Board of County Commissioners) which involves dredge and fill activities. Referred to Dr. Proffit, Tom Kuck and filed. 5. Letter dated 2/28/86 from Frank H. Thomas, Assistant Admini- strator, Pederal Emergency Management Agency, reminding that a Flood Insurance Rate ~tudy establishing base flood eleva- tion~ has been completed: the Flood Insurance P~te ~ap will become effective on 06/03/86: and by that date this community must have its Ip.gally enforceable flood plain management measures approved by FEriA Regional Office staff. Peferreð to Ken euyler. Tom McCaniel, Pam ßranqaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. 6. Copy of letter dated 2/'-4/86 to Mr. Wm. R. Kynoch, Dept, of Labor and Employment Security, from James C. Giles, Fiscal Officer, acknowledging the approval of $52,034 for indirect costs for the JTP~ program for 10/1/83-9/30/84, and enclosing letter from State C,O.L. dated 2/7/86. Referred to BCC and filed. ! : Page 33' ~~ <, .. .. .. , , . ~. , 4 . . . , - .. .. March 11, 19Af; 7., Copy of letter dated 2/20/96 from Glenn W. Robertson, Jr. Florida Land and ~"ater Adjudicatory Commission, to /1s. Snaryn Smith, Oivision of Administrative Hearings, regarding ORI, Ber~shire Lakes, an~ enclosin1 Motice of Appeal, Petition of Dept. of Community Affairs 09/27/85, Informal Conference Motice, letter re~uestinq Extension of Time: Prehearing Stipulation from DCA, Motion to Abate from SWFRPC, Notice of Appeal SWFRPC and other related items. Refcrred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. A. ~otice of Appeal date~ 3/4/A~ from Land an~ Water Adjudica- tory Commission re Pine Air Lakes DRl Development Order No. 85-5 and Ord. 85-67. Referred to Pam ~rangaccio, Vickic Mullins and filed. 9. Memoranrlum dated 2/1A/A6 from ~ale ~. Heideman, Staff Director. Pept. of Law Enforcement. re Local Gove~nment eriminal Justice Trust Fun~, and attaching forms for first and second quarters, reauesting completion of forms with resoect to the costs encountered for Medical Examiner services during each auarter. Referred to Lori Zalka, Pam Brangaccio and fi led. . 10. Minutes of CCPC of 2/20/96 and agenda for 03/06/86. Filed. 11. Letter dated 2/20/A6 from Mr. and Mrs. Ronald J. Fitzpatrick opposing Petition R-85-27C, Poxfire PUD. Referred to DCC, Hissy McKim and filed. 12. 14. Letter received 2/24/86 from F.dwar~ H. Karl, President of Ironwood Condollinium, opposing Petition R-85-2AC, Lely. Referred to Missy McKim and filed. Letter dated 2/25/86 from Leonard W. Rowley, President Victoria Park II Property OWners Assoc., op~sing Petition R-B5-20C, North View. Referred to Missy McKim and filed. Bulletin 86-01 dated 2/20/86 from D. R. "Buddy" Dewar, Director, Division of State Fire Marshal, re improper installation of pre-enqineered systems. Referred to Dave Davenport and filed. 13. , \.,'-,¡ , ........ .,-, " - , . -- .' -. ", " '\' J J. _._ ao~ 092 PAG£4DO page 34 ;V~'f {J;~> ,,; t ,I . 1 'DOl( 092 P.~ 491 March 11, 1986 ... There being no further business for the Good of the County, the ~eet1n9 was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Tine: 3:15 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BO~RD OF ZONING ^PPEALE/r.X OFFIeIO c;OVERUIN'G BOARr-(S) OP S~ECI^L DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL" ~': !}üAlìb " 0" "'" ..ÀTTEST.I :(' ( :'tfÍLLI}U'('J .-I"..,RtAGAN, CLERK . . . ... -,. ~'4/; ~,o"" '~~iV~1~ht~s approved by th~CC on presented ~ or as corrected ./ / . '-" ~ ~ p1.çð~ as Page 35 ~ , ~ r t - .. ..