Loading...
BCC Minutes 04/15/1986 R .. .. " .. "',"'\' Naples, Florida, April 15, 1986 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and aleo acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John A. Pistor VICE-CHAIRMAN: Anne Goodnight Frederick J. Voss Max A. Hasse C. C. "Red" Holland ALSO PRESENT: William J. Reagan, Clerk; James C. Giles, Fiscal Officer; Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerk; Donald B. Lusk, County Manager; Neil Dorrill, Assistant County Manager; Tom Olliff, Administrative Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Burt Saunders, Attorney; Bruce Anderson, Assistant County Attorney; Tom Kuck, Publi~ Works Administrator; Vickie Mullins, Community Development Administrator; Ann McKim, Planner; Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; Michael McNees, Utilities Administrative Assistant; Sue Filson, Secretary to the Board; and Deputy Chief Ray Barnett, Sheriff's Department. -. . 093 PAG!: 279 Page 1 &OOK ..., ¡. . : --,.-."-,,,,,.--''''''--'''~-'--~' ~~ . ·'1· ~-_.~ ..,----- -. ...........---T/Iiii· ,-.----...-- . l -".>,. ... .,.,.. " r .,.,.. ," ." ....:.~~~ "!f:''', ~. -4 ~: .i ":", ;¡'i'~ ' ", \. " . ' J j\-'j " , ~' .... ~1 . f April 15, 1986 'rap. tl It.m tl ~GEND~ - ~PPROVED WITH CHANGES Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried uanimously, that the agenda be approved with the following changes: a. Item 12A to be heard at 2:00 P.M. b. Item 1483 moved to Item 982 at request of Commissioner Hasse c. Item 6C5 re ordinance amending ordinance 76-6, Subdivision Regulations - Added and then continued to 4/22/86. Item f2 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS - PRESBNTED Commissioner Plstor presented Employe. Service Awards to the following employees: Esteban Gomez - Road & Bridge Laura Celedonia - Water Management Elmer Hoffman - Building Inspection Mark Eillis - EMS Martha Ginter - EMS 10 years 5 years 5 years (Absent) 5 years (Absent) 5 years (Absent) Item t3 BARBAPA XOMORNY RECOGNIZED AS EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH FOR ~PRIL, 1986 Commissioner pis tor presented a plaque to Barbara Komorny for recognition as Employee of the Month for April, 1986. Item 14 PROCLAMATION DBSIGNATING THE WEEX OF KAY 5-11, 1986, AS "DRINKING WATBR WEBX" - ADOPTBD Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner Voss moved, .econded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that , , Page 2 , " ">Ii" "\ . ~Oll~ 093 mt287 '. ~ ,,' .. ' " , . .. . 14: . . , rJ ";'~~-,.' .. I . :. t, .. ,.~. ..) I: .' ',.""."'i..".".......,...,_.,...~._._.~..,~~,....,.~~,;."'_'""" .".......-.-............"...,.."'...._.._..,.,.....,. .'if ~~4 ~.. ' ¡;;' . ·K I 4.(" ". 11'-'. -.~. -,Þ ..~ :'d" ~ t,;~-¡ ..-; i. f i, r' , I- I I:' L~:, ; "r¡ t·." ~t1.:; J. ,'.:¡ ~ ~. -. . ,'¡ . 'DO( 093 !'1~.1288 April 15, 1986 the proclamation deslgnating the week ot Hay 5-11, 1986, as "Drlnking Water We.k" be adopted. M'I.:.f. :L" " "'If "';¡e ; ; L. ,L·'· '. . - , .. .. .. ". ,. .:._<~. ...., ......,-..,.... '"'--,,-_.....,,_..~,_.~.,.,_.,-,..~,..",.~ --,._-- "'....."..""'"-_."~ '. Page 3 ". , J h, 1':';" . " r '~;¡~;:-. ... .0 'f,Vr~ -. .. -.' .. ~.~.. ., .,1:" .'. , " ,. it~',¡. ~ .. ~~('r~ .... ':'~ i ~f .~ " . t . ',t ~. ";'.\f~' i' . ,'.;, ..');, .~. '..093 na200 ¡''';' ·:~·,:!;,.,.,...t ;'¡.4'i~:;~t:,~J/: .,. ;~" ".:: j 'i "," " '.' .: ~;,.. j,t'.¥'-, " ~. ..:~;,~:'%t.. 15 : . t<. ~';' . . r' 'PRBSElITATION FROM . ¡ U Apr il 15, 1986 4-H R!: "JCNOW YOUR COUNTY GOVERNMENT" Mr. Jim McCarrus stated that he has learned much in the "Know Your County Government" program, adding that he feels that the whole groCp has enjoyed the experience. Ms. Mia Dow stated that they have met various people from the Community Development, the Water Treatment Plant, the Solid Waste Department, Data Processing Department, the Property Appraiser, and the Tax Collector, adding that these departments have shown them the structure of a local government and how each department depends on the other departments to successfully manage the County. Mr. McCarrus stated that he would like to thank the Commission for having them and also thanK the various staff for the information and the cooperation they received. Item " SETTLEXENT OF EAST nPLES WATER SYSTEXB, INC., THE GLADES, INC. AND HUBSCHKAN ASSOCIATES - CONTINUED TO APRIL 22, 1986 - ADOPTED County Attorney Cuyler stated that his office has spent a con- siderable amount of time identifying the legal issues in order to make sure that a legally sufficient document is presented to the Board. He stated that there was a proposed draft yesterday and a number of suggestions to the agreement have been made by the Hubschman'e. He stated that those aU9geatione were not incorporated as Staff did not have the opportunity to check into the legal rami- Page 4 . , I ". :1 i. ':, : ' \ ; '. .~,.. '.. ~,...- :... .' .. "'/""~\ ../'" . ..., . ..:A",. (.)""",. . ........" H ~...A ,__....... _ ., ~~ ~ . ',¡.....,. , -. '...."..,... ~ . ':'œJ.l.·: r.L. --~...~.. ~ _...._~,..~_.,..".,.~""""-"-''''_......_--~-;.".,..'''..,,,,.._-,..",~".."., , ~ I, ~í". . . ,. ~" -t-~...".,....~..--:---- . ..,.., t~/ .. '!tb: M..~~~ '. ,.". . '~,~~.': ~~J' ,'Ii <' , . --.....;r--~-. '7"'" r.... . ' . -.'; . . .~.~ .' ..\. "\- , '!/'. " .. '..- .-.-. .~\ ,; . . \ ! ·;·...1 ~ ",,~ " , 'M Apr il 15, 1986 fications of those suggestions and he is, therefore, suggesting thðt this matter be continued. Mr. James Siesky, Attorney for the Glades, Inc. and Hubschman Asso~iates, stated that he is recommending that the Board not consider it this date, adding that he has had great cooperation from Staff in trying to work out problems and it is not fair to ask Staff to work through the night to come up with an agreement that may not be their best efforts. He stated that there should be a few days allowed to consider the changes. He stated that he is working under a time constraint separate from anything that relates to the settlement agreement as it relates to the Board. He stated that he would like to wait until later in the meeting to $et the date. Commissioner Voss questioned if the ruling of the PSC could be held off, to which Mr. Siesky indicated that they would, providing that an agreeable date could be reached to reschedule the hearing. Assistant County Attorney Anderson stated that as soon as he finds out if East Naples can work out their other time constraints, .' he will come back to the Board to check the date prior to the end of the meeting. Col. John Beebe, President of the Lakewood Civic Assoc;ation, stated that they favor, in principle, the idea of a settlement. He stated that he would urge the Board to consider supporting this at the proper time. Mr. George Keller, President of Collier Co~nty Civic Federation, stated that he feels that this settlement should be approved, but it ·&OOK 093 pm 291 Page 5 iU~', ~ :: ; , . , , (...: . , ri ~ , :.:~. JO . , I . 17" '!"'II . '·""~"""_"I_Wb",o"""""",,,,.,,,-__.,,_ . ,'( ~ JOR 093 nr,! 292 . ~ I { ! April 15, 1986 should not be rushed into. He stated that the Public Service Commission is considering giving East Naples the expanded service area that they are requesting. Later in the meeting,' it was determined that the date of April 22, 1986, would be a convenient time to resolve the settlement agreement. Commlssioner Basse moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that the Settlement of East Naple. Water systems, Inc., the Glades, Inc. and HUbsohman Associates be con- tlnued to April 22, 1986. Item '7 RESOLUTIO~ 86-61 CREATINQ THB TRINITY PLACB WATER SBRVICB SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ADOPTED. UTILITIBS DIV. ~UTHORIZED TO OBTAIN A LONG-T~RM FIXED RATE CONVENTION~L LOAN ESTIKATED ~T $125,000 AND TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH BNGINEER OP RECORD, HOLE, MONTES , ASSOC. FOR COMPLETION OP ENGINEERING WORX ON PROPOSED PROJECT ~ TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS FOR TWO CORNER LOTS ON U.S. 41 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 25, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the creation of the Trinity Place Water Service Special Assessment District. Utilities Administrative Assistant McNees stated that cn January 24, 1986, the Board received a petition representing at least 50\ + 1 of the property owners in an area located in Sections 8 and 17, Township 51S, Range 27E, which is properties fronting Trinity Place. He stated that the petition requested the creation of a water ser- Page 6 -. , "',~' , .' ~. '" ,. /' <-t, ; _...r,. ."~ , _4",~:, ..r>':;:..,....,· -,.,~'<~ . <I..'..'l .' . .... .."'"'_......."'..-. -- . - ~\_..... '.. ---"'......,,"..-;-.""...""'~"'_.;"';---~ 'i;"· "" . " ¡. ¡" .r:¡ ~;~ ~ :r~~ f .~ ~-.p . , . '. April 15, 1986 vice special assessment district pursuant to County Ordinance 75-14. He stated that the County Engineering Staff prepared a preliminary feasibility report includin3 engineering, legal and administrative costs that give an estimated project cost for this project of $123,719 with an estimated front foot assessment of $14.7298 per front foot. He stated that the property owners were notified of this proportionment and of the public hearing of this date. He stated that he received two letters of objection, one from Mr. Fred Robinson of Indiana and the other from Mr. Edward Hallinan, noting that they feel that this would not be of any benefit to them as there is adequate water supply and a lot of the property is undeve- loped, as well as the pric~ of the assessment. He stated that when he investigated this matter, he found that this is consist~nt with how properties have been assessed under the County Regional Water Assessment and other projects. He noted that water service is available on U.S. 41 at the present time a~d he is going to suggest that if this project is approved, that an adjustment be made to two pieces of property as they have water from U.S. 41 already and, therefore, 150' of frontage needs to be deleted from the corner lots. r:..';.~ Tape f2 ,,+,, ..' In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. McNees stated that the County is proposing 7 hydrants. Commissioner Voss questioned the frontage of Parcel *1 and the one across from it, to which Mr. McNees stated that Parcel *1 would Page 7 " 093 PAGt 293 &00': / ,''!- þ< ..... .. ~.. ~., ~ ,i. .. . ~ ~ , '_··_..····.-"'"."',"',,;~_"'k"".,..·~_"',,...,""",'_..,,_......__~=.''''''''__._.''' . ,...."."~.,.,.."""'''''''.,.,_,.,,,.,_,,,'',,.,,,"...'.'....'~,', t:1(-. . ,.. " r:'~. ~g:. ;' ~~"~'\ 093 pm 294 , , ì J '~ . t J t .i April 15, 1986 be around 900 feet and Parcel '44 has a total frontage of 899 feet , and he would recommend that this be reduced by 150 feet to allow for the corner. ~rs. Evelyn Hughes stated that they have just been ~ssessed for the paving district and she cannot understand why it costs the same amount for water as it did to raise the road and pave it. She stated that she feels that this assessment is too high and objects to the assessment. Mr. Carmine Dapice stated that he is in favo¿ of water service because the water that is there now is not sanitary. He stated that with the water service there will also be fire protection. Mr. Steve Richards stated that everybody wants good water and he is in favor of this, but the price of the water is too high. commissioner Voss move4, seconded by Commlssioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public bearing Þe olosed. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commlssioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-61 oreating the Trinity Place Water service special Assessment District be adopted and that the utilities Divislon be authorized to obtain a long-term fixed rate conventional loan in an amount estimnted at $125,000 and to negotiate a contract with Engineer of Record, HOle, Montes , ~ssoc. for completion of engineering work on the proposed project and make the ISO' adjustments for the two lots that face U.S. 41. " Page 8 '. , I ~ . ", ~" ..;, '. .. .~~, ~/.. ..' '~.~.'t".~ .,:.'._ . . .".....4.:' '...1.;....... -../.~.,.;................. .;~..; ~ "_-1"-"""""- . ...~'~'; ,. . . '" . ~#--.....I..', . '.' _.._-,..~"''''''''''::l ""'".""''"'''"'--"'~'''''''" ~-'""-"""-;""";""_____'___""""~""'''''''''''''",,;~'''''_''';''''''''''''''''_'.-<,-""",_""__""~,u","___,,",,",,,"~,_,,,.,~,,,_,,,~.,.,,,~~__,,,,,,,._.....,,~.. , ,. " '" ~. .'f çJ.' . ,'/ t.- J )',\, (;.....1\ 093" Pl~! 298 Apr il 15, 1986 It.m f8 RESOLUTION K1fS 86-6 CON1'IRMING RESOLUTION K1fS 86-2 ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF MARCO P~SE II SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM ~ RESOLUTION K1fS A6-7 CONFIRMING RESOLUTION K1fS 86-3 ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF MARCO PHASE II BFFLUENT DISPOSAL SPRAY IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - ADOPTED. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED TO CONSULTING ENGINEER8r WILSON, HILLER, BARTON, BOLL' PEEX, INC. Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 30, 1986, and the Marco Island Eagle on April 2, 1986, as evi- denced by Affidavits of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider confirming resolutions pertaining to the Marco Water and Sewer District Phase II Sewer Improvements. Utilities Administrative Assistant McNees stated that on March 25, 1986, the Board adopted two resolutions; one ordering the construction for Marco Phase II sanitary sewer improvements and another ordering construction of the corresponding spray irrigation effluent disposal distribution system. He stated that the County's consulting engineers, Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soli & Peek, Inc., have prepared plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost and a tentative apportionment of the cost between the District and the properties to be assessed. He stated that the preliminary cost estimates including engineering, legal, and administrative costs for the sewer collection system are $1,993,792.21 with a cost per assessable foot of $36.55 and for the spray irrigation system the estimated cost is $553,179.58 with a cost per assessable foot of $10.813. He stated that each property owner has been notified of Page 9 ,/, " .-;'." ~ - - .... 'N- , .~i: , , ~.._.. _.~_.".--,_... ,-,----....---- - - - Apr il 15, 1986 the preliminary cost and of this date of the hearing. He stated that he has received a number of letters of objections, noting that these people have asked that their comments be entered into the record. He stated that he received a letter from Rose Lenore Dubault who agrees with the sewer assessment but does not agree with the irrigation assessment because she does not plan to garden; a letter from Sal Sciarrino who objects to the method of the assessment; a letter from Thomas Argyris who objects to properties on cul-de-sacs being discriminated against and would like proof that the method that is u~ed is generally accepted in the State of Florida, that the cost is excessive compared to Phase I, and questions the quality of the effluent and whether or not adequate study has been done in that regard; a letter from John Eder who objects to being assessed for a commercial lot that is mostly asphalt; a letter from Joseph Samaritano who feels that his lot will become unmarketable if it is assessed because the cost will be too high: a letter from Chris Wieland who feels that he is paying 50\ more than his neighbor because he is on a cul-de-sac; ð letter from H. Lissek who feels that the amount of the assessment is totally unacceptable and as he is a below water user, he does not feel that he should have effluent system; a letter from Walter Lada who objects to the cost and objects to the effluent system; a letter from Florence Smith who has been trying to sell her lot for a number of years and feels that the cost will be excessive and make it more !OOJ; 093 f:o'.1 299 Page 10 _..-·..._..__.._.···~'·.·""_M,_.""'''''''__ " not 093 PAGt 300 April 15, 1986 difficult to sell the lot; a letter from Frank Haas who objects to the cost; and a letter from Emery Wilson Creekbaum who objects to the lcgality of the project and feels that there should have been a referendum and objects to the effluent system on a safety basis as the technology is untested, He stated that he received a call from a Mr. Phillip Muskett who asked that his objection be voiced that as ðn investor if he has to put this type of cost into a lot, it no longer is a viable investment and he would have to liquidate. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that the Deltona System has requested and not received approval for additional cÐpacity of their water treatment plant, which is another option for the people to reduce the amount of water used, adding that there is a great deal of water used for irrigation purposes for watering lawns and gardens. He stated that Marco is a high user because of the saline water in the wells as most wells are not usable, adding that by putting in the effluent sY3tem it would reduce the amount of per capita of water use and it would delay the amount of time needed for Deltona to have to acquire additional permits for water wells. He stated that South Florida Water Management District has some con- cern over their raw water supply and it appears that there will be a great deal of expense in expanding their water treatment facilities to meet the demands of the area. Utilities Administrative Assistant McNees referred to an overhead map indicating that the areas in red are the proposed Phase Page 11 - - ~«.}~.~ ..~",~,",..,..";"...."."",..".,_...._-- - .. - April 15, 1986 II sewer areas and the areas in blue are the areas that the County curr~ntly serves which were constructed under Phase I. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. McNees stated that he has received a couple of questions regarding th~ appropriateness of an assessment on an area in lift station Area "N" for a commercial area that is primarily asphalt, adding that the owners feel that it is unfair to have an effluent system and be assessed for it since there is mostly parking lot, He stated that the Utility Staff would not object if that area was removed from the effluent system. Mr. Tom Peek of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc, stated that there iR a main collection system along Barfield that picks up the adjoining streets which is a force main that goes back to the treatment plant, adding that there is an existing force main along Collier Blvd. and certain areas will feed into that force main that goes back to the treatment plant. He stated that in Area "C", there is a gravity collection system with a conventional submerged pumping station that will feed into the force main at Barfield. He stated that Area "N" has a gravity collection system with a submer)ed pumping station near the center of the block that will feed back to the force main and Area "0" has two pumping stations with a gravity collection system and they feed into the line on North Collier Blvd. He stated that this is the general lay-out of the system. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Peek stated that he does not think that the spray irrigation can be used for consumptive pro- ducts. . -'- "._.- .. ~ -.- ;;;, C93r:" 301 Page 12 :" " , t..:v ..~ ~.' t-..~ l" '. t!~¡;;\;~, ~'-J, '/-.,;:./{,' '. aDDK 093" PAGt 302 April 15, 1986 Utilities A1ministrator Crandall 8tat~d that it is DER's opinion ~hat they would prefer to not have vegetabte gardens sprayed unless the vegetables are going to be canned because in the canning pro- . cess.. there is a steaming process that they go through and would be an additional protection for the raw vegetables that are used. He ~~} stated that until there is further data available on this, they recommend that it not be used for gardening. Mr. Peek stated that the assessment method was dctermined by taking the mid point along the side lot line and computing the distance from mid point to mid point which gives the average lot width which is the most equitable and uniform way to calculate the assessment footages. He stated that this relates very directly to the area b~cause the depth of the lots are fairly uniform. He noted that this is the most favorable and fairest to everyone and is the assessment method that was used in Phase I. The following people spoke against the excessive cost, the method of assessment, the spray effluent system, the benefit that Deltona Corporation will receive from this, and for purchasing the Deltona plant: Chris L. Wieland Tap. f3 Phil Josberger Tape '4 Sal Sciarrino Emery Creekbaum Diana Jerome I. E. Evans Rev. George Kelsey spoke in favor of the sewer collection system as it is needed for health purposes. i. , .£J'.. i:;· Page 13' - - .--,....-- "'(, t""",, ¡~ :":.,_~~,~,:, . "!H~~~~ ,'.,,""',,"., "''-'-'."..'t>'.- ,.,,,.,,~,",,,__~,,,_~~__""W" - .. - - April 15, 1986 ..... Recess: 10:50 ~.M. - Reconvened: 11:00 A.M. ..... Mr. Donald r,ondee stated that he is in favor of the sewer collection system, but he would like to see it postponeò until some of the issues can be resolved with regards to the spray effluent or the purchase of the plant from Deltona Corporation. Mr. Roy Bartlett spoke against the sewer collection system as there are too many unanswered questions. Tape IS Mr. Leo Volkheimer stated that he is in favor of the system as it is definitely needed, but he questions the way the lots are being l:ssessed. Mr. Ted Naftal, Jr. stated that he is against the sewer collec- tion system and the assessment as well as the spray effluent as it does not work. commlssioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Mr. Peek stated that based on the detailed plans, the prices arc realistic even though they seem to be high. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that there is a need for a sewer collection system on Marco and based on the original deve- lopment of the property, there was an agreement that at 50\ of deve- lopment, sewers would be installed. He stated that this will be necessary in the future and the costs will be higher then, adding that he would recommend that the County go forward with it at this time. ðoGK 09J"PAGE 3UJ" Page 14 ~>, ,....~"_..-""....u""_....___~.__ &OO( 093 pJ.c,t304: April 15, 1986 Commissioner Voss stated that the cost of irrigation is going to be far less than using potable water and the people will be able to recoup their cost. cosmlssioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commlssioner Voss, that Resolution MWS 86-6 confirmlng Resolution MWS $6-2 ordering construction of the Marco Phase II sewer collection system and Resolution MWS 86-7 confirming Resolution MWS 86-3 oraering construction of the Marco Phase II effluent disposal spray irriga- tion distribution system be adopted, that the plans, specifications, cost .stimates, and tentative apportionment of such cost as prepared, by the consulting engineers, Wilson, Miller, Barton, 8011 , Peek, Inc. b. accepted; that the consulting engineer be authorized to obtain bids for the construction of the ordered improvements; that payment be authorlzed to the consulting engineers in an amount not to exceed $118,235 for services to be rendered durlng the bidding and construction phases pursuant to the contract dated November 2, 1976. County Attorney Cuyler stated that he was not aware prior to the public hearing that Commissioner Pistor owns property within this area that will be assessed, adding that he would advise that he abstain from voting on this matter due to any type of conflict. Commissioner Holland stated that according to the Executive Sum- mary, it indicates that if there are no objections filed, this should be recommended for approval. He stated that he has only heard a few .., ' n ~ ¥ . 'l> Page 15 - - _. ""~~~..,.,..~.,,._ ~ .' ,..~"., "".,..". .. ".,..,' ,.'~'., _.' .,...,..,,·H' _....__.. ","","~".", ..."""-,-.-,_., ,r' '. ~_. '!t ! , I \il 'J·.f ~ April 15, 1986 ,,: (" people speak in favor of this end the majority are against it. He I, / stated that he would have a hard time saying that objections have been resolved. Commissioner Goodnight stated that it comes back for final approval, there will be several different ways of looking at the assessment and at that time, the Commission will have to decide which way the assessment should be handled. She stated that a lot of objection was due to the effluent line, but it should be put in et this time because the cost will be less now than a year or two from now. upon call for the question, the motion oarrie4 3/1, (commissioner Holland opposed and Commissioner pistor abstained). '^J . . ~ r,¡.. ^~ , ...' " : «~ , . !:- ¡ 1 l ( ~ '~;'~Y':¡;~;1 öu',' .:-;,\0 ~..' ·-.1 ~ ~ ~!.: t" . , , ~ "¡'. ;, ~ ~ ~ r :, 1 ·,,'1.J "~. 'A '.... . /1 (::::;. _f:) TIm 093 pAG!:305 Page 16 f" (:" t :" ..,'. E '. ....,___.."_,...___"'.._","O.·~..">-<.,..¡,,."",..·.."',...._·····"""··.""~""'.'"'''''''''' ..",_."_",,..",'4^'~"""""'_"__'_"'__ *k.t ~r"'''' i; ~L '/ !:' :.' "~I ~~.,'" .. .. oJ.':, .- ( ;" \ I I \ \ &001( 093 PAr,t 310 Apr 11 15, 1986 Item " RESOLUTION 8'-'3 RE PETITION PDA-8'-5C, TEAM PLAN, INC., REPRESENTING PINE AIR LAKES, INC., REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO PINE AIR DEVELOPMENT ORDER '85-5, DBALING WITH TRANSPORTATIO~ - ADOPT~D Legal notice having béen published in the Naples Daily News on March 30, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider petition PDA-86-5C, filed by Team Plan, Inc. requesting an amendment to Pine Air Lakes Development Order 185-5, Paragraph 6.i, dealing with transportation improvements for property located on the northwest corner of Pine Ridge Road and Airport Road in Section 11, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Planner McKim stated that the objective of this petition is to approved the resolution amending Development Order #85-5, for Pine Air Lakes. She noted that on November 12, 1985, the ßCC approved PUD zoning and the Development Order for Pine Air Lakes PUD/DRI, adding that on January 2, 1986, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council filed an appeal to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission pllrsuant to Section 380.07, Florida Statutes of the Development Order issued by Collier County approving Pine Air Lakes Development. She stated that SWFRPC found the Development Order to be insufficient because it requires that improvements needed to maintain level of Service "C" on any regional road segment or intersection for which the projects traffic will exceed the ten percent of the level of Service "COO service volument of that Page 17 ',' -. ,,,,'1 . . ~ '.. ~, ", ..' -/< - ,"~ " , -,,~~: :/U~.' ~.~. ,} :.:"~"'. ~ """"~... - --. -, ~fItÓ.":~-""" -'~r-'7-/IIII.~'''''-' '.' ,-r~..."Tj li,,!:;,- .,' 't .¡ ~ ' ',..1';.,- ' , . \.'. ~.. ,~ .' .' , ..,.--._.,~\ ..... , J i, .~ --. .J!,.. . " : ~..~. , ,r.-~ '. April 15, 1986 segment/intersection, must be operational coincident with develop- ment of the project. She stated that if the projects eevelopment exceeds five percent of the level of Service "COO, the improvements must be made. She noted that the State required ten percent rather than the five percent as their criteria, adding that ten percent is what was used in the Development Order and the Region appealed and the developer has agreed to the five percent which is the more stringent requirement and this will resolve the problem of the State anj the Region. She stated that she is recommending approval of this resolution as it will also resolve the appeal. commissioner Voss moved, seoonded by Commissioner Goodni9ht and oarried unanlmously, that the publio hearing be olosed. commissioner Goodnight moved, seoonðed by commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-62 re Petition PDA-86-5C, Team Plan, Inc., representing pine Air Lakes, Inc., requesting an amendment to pine Alr Development Order '85-5, dealing with transportation be adopted. aDDK 093nQ311 Page 18 I. t~'t ~fl " ~ i, , . '. tit l . ' . I. ........._._._""... ~. ...._"·.._.,_u~._,,..____'"__ · ,...' / ,.J :: ,'¡, .' ~. ~ ~ } , ,1' :' ) lOOK 093' P1'·t 314 April 15, 1986 It.. 110 ORDIXANCE AMBNnING ORDINANCE 76-6, THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS POR THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT - CONTINUED TO 4/22/86 ~ommission.r Voss aoved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that'the ordinance ..ending Ordinanoe 76-6, the Subdlvision Regulations for the Coastal Area Planning Distriot be continued to ~pril 22, 1986. " ' Item III LBASB WITH CITY or NAPLBS ~IRPORT AUTdORITY rOR HELICOPTER OPBRATIONS SITE - APPROVED Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the objective of this item is to lease the Helicopter operations site from the Naples Airport Authority, adding that this site is used as a landing take- off strip, storage, and an office for the Emergency Medical Services helicopter operations. He stated that the lease has ~een reviewed by the County Attorney and executed by the Naples Airport Authority with the renewal being for a term of one year at a cost of $260 per month or $3,120 per year, He stated that he is recommending appro- val of this lease. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the lease with the City of Napl.s Airport Authority for the hellcopter operations site be approved. Page 19 / .. I -. :1' ~.~,,; ,..... , " "'J~"'t7 . "," ,..?~, ; ·1..... .Þ~'" .' .' ~ " . _......,"'"'....m="_.........·'*_,~_.,___..___·~_...,··,,_ :; '.,', .. .. - J.:;¡",~ .:;.,~ ,:;:~~ April 15, 1986 Item 112 EXCAV~TION PERMIT NO. 59.245 "RIVER REACH PUD" - APPROVED SUBJECT '1'0 STIPULATIONS CommIssioner Hasse stated that he has had several calls on this matter with regard to a further explanation of what is to be done in the arp.è1. ?ublic Works Administrator Kuck stated that this is a typical ~~oject, adding that the retention facility is a 9.6 acre lake that will have a bottom elevation of -6.0 ft. ngvd with a minimum depth of -4.5 ft. ngvd. He stated that existing ground elevation is bet- ween 4 ft. and b ft., which would mean about 12 feet of material would be excavated, He stated that it is a standard excavation that has been reviewed by the Water Management Adviso-y Board and recomMended for approval. commissioner Voss moved, seconðed by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimousl~', that Excavatlon Permit No. 59.245, Rlver Reach PUD be approved subject to the following stipulations I I. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevati~n of -6.0 ft. ngvd. All disturbed areas proposed for lake exca- vation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of -4.5 ft, ngvd. 2. No excavated material shall be removed from the project site. 3. Off-site discharge of groundwater during construction shall be only through approved discharge structures after water quality treatment approved by the County Engineer. 4. No Building Construction Permits will be issued for any pro- posed construction around the perimeter of any lake unless and until all lake side slopes adjacent to the proposed construction have been completed and approved by the Collier ~oOK 093' I'm 321 Page 20 ml 093 p~r,t 322 Apr il 15, 1986 CO!Jnty Water Management Department. The Petitioner may submit detailed building site development plans to the Water Management Director. If these plans show adequate buildingïlake separation for lake slope construc- tion and are approved, Building Permits may be iesued but Certificates of Occupancy shall be withheld pending comple- tion of the excavation in accordance with Ordinance No. 83-3. Item '13 HIRING OP XEVIN O'DONNELL AS PUBLIC SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR AT THB SALARY OP $38,584 AND 1/2 THE INTERVIEW FLIGHT BXPENSBS OF $500 _ APPROVED County Manager Lusk stated that this is to confirm the appoint- ment of Mr. Kevin O'Donnell who went through an interview process ~nd we9 selected as the number one candidate for the Public Services Administrator. Ir. answer to Commissioner-Voss, County Manager Lusk stated that historically this County did not pay any of the airfare, but as time went by, there were certain people that the County wanted to inter- view, but those applicants balked at the idea of paying their own airfare round trip. He stated that the recommendation is for 1/2 the interview flight expenses, adding that he feels if a candidate has to pay half the expenses he is going to be sincere abollt applying for the position. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hass. and oarrieð unanimously, that the hlring of Xevin O'Donnell as Publio Services Administrator at the salary of $38,584 and 1/2 the inter- view flight expenses of $500 for the two top candidates for the position be approved. . . Page 21 . , ~ - - - ~----'..._. .-- ~_.,_._-,_..-..._..._.- v ""!.... ',,',:,7110 ~."'" ~.". . ,:y"J.\~, ~ ".,~.~ ;,i :t .¡., ....,....._"....__.....''''''_.m"'''..''''''_~.,'''_~ '1>., .. " .. .. ':~i., " , ....~\. '~"'. April 15, 1986 Item fl4 BID FOR SHORT-TERM FINANCING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF MARCO ISLAND PHASE II SEWER AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS - AWARDED TO FIRST NATIONAL BAN~ OF NAPLES FOR $2,225,000 FOR 18 MONTHS AT 5.5\ Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that this item is a com- pan ion item to the Marco Island Phase II sewer and irrigation impro- vements. He stated that he is asking that the Board authorize the financing of the construction of Phase II for 18 months at a 5.5\ fixed rate for the repayment to be made from proceeds of the bond issue, which will allow the County to move ahead without having to wait to get the bonds and the financing in advance. He stated that by law, the County could only finance 70\ by bond until the comple- tion and then another bond would have to be issued. Tape 16 Commlssioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and oarrled unanimously, that the bid for short-term financing during construction of Marco Island Phase II sewer and irrigation improve- ments be awarded to Flrst National Bank of Naples tor $2,225,000 for 18 months at 5.5\. Item fl5 UTILITIBS ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZED TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSULTANTS TO PROVIDB ENGINEBRING SERVICES RELATED TO PHASB I CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER TREATMENT FACILITY AND APPROVE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that there is not a site specific recommended yet for the Regional Sewer Treatment Facility "aOOK 093'PAr,r 323 Page 22 .....-...,;"'''''''...... >.' ,. ,.*"~~.".,--»._-,,"'''"''"*~'"---..~' ...~.~~.".....""',. " i lOOK 093 P~~.t 324 April 15, 1986 that is proposed to be built in the future; the County is under a tight schedule for being grant eligible and he would like to be able to get money for that construction. He stated that the treatment plant design needs to be completed as soon as possible to make the County eligible for that grant. He stated that approval of this item will allow for the consultant selection with a recommendation for award of design contract in about 6 to 8 weeks, adding that the Board would be authorizing Staff to ~elect a consultant and bring that recommendation back to the Board for approval. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carrled unanlmously, that the utilities Administrator be authorized to advertise for consultants to provide engineerl~g servlces related to Phase I construction of the Collier County Regional Sewer Treatment facillty and to approve the establishment of the Con- sultant Selection Committee which wlll consist of the utilities Administrator, the ~sAistant County Manager, the utilities Operations Director, the Public Works Engineering Director, the County Manager, and the Utilities Engineering Director. ..... Recess: 11:45 ~.M. - Reconvenedl 1:45 P.M. ..... Item 116 DISCUSSION REGARDING GOLDEN GATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - NO ACTION TAXEN Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that he brought this item up to inform the Board as to the situation of the Avatar Page 23 , ';,.-¡; . ~ '. ....' . .. " - _. ,,', , .¿: --".""",,,,,,,,--,- __"""-",.,,, '·-''''"''0'''''''''_'''ø'''~-.'_''~';''''"''''''';·~' ·... . . ~JI.' j" .. "'.',., April 15, 1986 Wastewater Treatment Plant, adding that the purpose is that there has been several complaints over the last few months about the odor at the plant and concerns about the issuance of pcrmits because they are close to if not exceeding some of the limits that DGR has established for the treatment removal. He stated that he has spoken with Gordon Romeis of DER several times and he has been advised that at the present time, Avatar is operating on a temporary operating permit and an application for a permanent operation permit is being considered. He stated that until they can prove a few things, one being the dissolved oxygen problem, DER is not in a position to approve the permanent operating permit. He stated that the plant is a 300,000 gallon per day plant being at or near capacity with the amount of customers that there are now, but DER's main objective is to get a good removal. He stated that Avatar indicates that they can get the good removal by doing certain modifications to the plant, adding that they have promised DER that they are doing the modifications and are giving records to DER to prove that they are getting better results. He stated that DER is not satisfied at this time that Avatar is getting better results, but they have been given two weeks to come up with the results. He stated that at the end of two weeks, DER is going to find out what corrective measures will be taken. He noted that DER will have to issue a violation notice if Avatar does not take the necessary corrective ~ction. He stated that at this time, Avatar is operating under a TOP, and they are &OoK 093 mt 3'25 Page 24 "''''.....,.,·".,''";o.¡¡~"''''.,.','''a.j>'"''','''.,._...,''''~_i;;'.__,t.'',....___'''__"""_,_.",,,,,,,~.,,,,.,,,,,,...,,,,,,,.,,.....,..,,,,,,,,,,_,..,,,,,..,.,,,,,....>.·.·".~",,",'.~'".w,. &DDK 093 PAr.! 328 , , April 15, 1986 '. ; . able to hook on additional customers as long as they meet the remo- 'val rat'3 that DER is asking, but they have been cautioned not to add on large users. He stated that if Avatar issues a letter each time indicating that they have available space, the County will con- tinue to issue permits, adding that they will probably be on single family homes. He noted that DER has been asked by Avatar if they can put in a 100,000 gallon temporary plant addition, He stated that if this is approved, they will have it done in 6 to 8 weeks and at the end of that period of time, Avatar will have all the capacity that they need. He stated that it is the interim between now and that 6 to 8 weeks that may create some problems in putting on large - users. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Crandall stated that there is no problem with the ðmount of percolation ponds, JOIst with the odor emanating from those because Avatar was not getting the remo- val rate before the effluent was put into the ponds. He stated that the ponds are operating properly. He noted that he has been moni- toring the odor a~ the plant and he has not had any problems with it the last four weeks. Mr. Tony Reeves, Vice President of Avatar Utilities, stated that he had to get rid of the discharge in the canal which he did, adding that part of his plan with DER was 3 phase, first to put the per- colation ponds in, second to put water mains in, and third to build additional capacity and upgrade the treatment. He stated that the ,.< t' ,<"~~"c~ Page 25 . ~. , .. - _. ~~. '1~; ",';'.~4J¡.; , '.f·,t~ .~ ,:,,..' . "Yf;\,<,. ·,.'·C.::;:-· ., ,', 'f)~" ""'.."'__..·,.,.....,."_'Œ·~..'.,.,__~,_....______·_ .. -= - April 15, 1986 ponds have been built and they are operational, the water mains are being installed ðnd they are about 70% completed, and the waste water treatment addition will be a completely new plant because the old plant has a lot of old wiring. He stated that there has been a lot of population explosion within the area, adding that he has made a decision pending permitting from DER, a 100,000 gallon a day package treatment plant which will be brought in on skids and in operation in 6 weeks and will alleviate the problem until the new plant is constructed. Mr. Crandall stated that there is no action needed, adding that he simply wanted to inform the Board what was happening. He stated that Staff is simply acting as support to DER. Mr. Richard Braun stated that a couple of years ago Avatar was told that there would be no mo.~ large hookups on this system until the plant wan brought up to certification by all government agencies and this still has not been done. He stated that he has heard what Avatar is going to do, but they have indicated their plans before and they have never been carried out. He stated that dealing with Avatar has not been pleasant and he would recommend that the Board enter into an agreement to purchase thie plant and, in the meantime, issue no more building permits or allow any further hookups. Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that this was primarily to advise the Board as to what is happening in Golden Gate and what the intentions of Avatar are and in the event that they run into aOOK 093' PAGE 327 Pðge 26 -~....~~..."_.,."",.,,.....-_..--,,,,,,-,~-, _..."--".....,=,-.~'..>.,..",.~""-_..."'- &oOK 093 PAGt 328 April 15, 1986 some problems, Staff will be back before the Board with a follow-up , report. Item 117 BCC CHAIRMAN TO WRIT! A LETTER TO DOT AND THE GOVERNOR INDICATINQ ACCBSS CONCBRNS TO 1-75 AND COUNTY ~TTORNBY TO RESEARCH AN EXISTING AGRBBMENT AND BRING B~CX OPINION TO BCC ON 4/22/86 Mr. M. Dan Nichel, Chairman of the Coordinating Committee of 21 persons opposed to the fencing of Alligator Alley stated that the Committee wishes to read a formal statement into the record because of the delay in being heard, hLet no one be mislead about the gravity of this case and the thousands of people it effected or any doubt that our committee of 21 speaks for a broad spectrum of concerned Collier Countians. The National Inn Holders Association, the largest and most powerful group in the Nation on causes such as ours as joined forces with us. Let the record show that there were approximately 50 property owners in attendance at the beginning of today's commission meeting. This being ð business and working day for most people, there would have been a greater number attending this meeting than this room would hold to support the position if the meeting had been in the evening." He stated that his presen- tation will be brief and to the pOint, noting that there exists a binding agreement between the State of Florida and the Collier County government which was made when Alligator Alley was approved and built that indicates there would be accesses every two miles. He stated that this same provision was made a part of all the deeds Page 27 '. ..../ , ' ~.,.~J; " '~~;. ,~, ..Wi'!, '¡,"{t< , . .. .. .. .. ~: ..... . ',-:',. "..~~ '.~.- Apr il 15, 1986 for the four hundred foot right-of-wðY given by the property owners for Alligator Alley. He stated that the accesses were stated as being in perpetuity forever. He stated that the land was given for an open road and they were legal binding agreements that pre-empted any other plðns. He stated that all subsequent purchðses of land north and south of Alligator Alley for building the roads for future plans have been based on a guaranteed open road. He reported that even if these agreements did not exist, there is no r~ason for I-75 to take over State Road 84 and fence Alligator Alley. Mr. Nickel stated that Alligator Alley was approved by the people and built and paid for by tolls, adding that two additional lanes and any needed corrections can be paid for with tolls. He indicated that any needed corrections as to water flow can be mðde without fencing and land condemnation. He stated that total fencing would require many miles of new Collier County roads across the County. He stated that Emergency Servlces, Fire Department, FService, Ambulance and Law enforcement would be crippled and this is a very serious matter affecting the health and welfare of Collier Countians. He stated that the Board has the power to prevent large housing projects in the rural area which they would give tt~ir sup- port to, adding that the Federal Government already owns three- fourths of the land mass of lower Florida. He stated that the purchases they contemplate with the citizen's tax dollars would increase their hOldings to approximately seven-eights of all of &OO( ,093" PAr,~ 329 Page 28 &00~ 093' pm 3'30 April 15, 1986 lower Florida, adding that it is time that this County said "Enough". He stated that th~re is already over 3,000 signatures in five days supporting thie case and they are increasing everyday. He introduced Mr. Frank Weed to discuss the issue of the Florida Panther. Tape '7 Mr. Frank Weed, Manager of the Florida Endangered Species Re~earch Association, stated that he lives on Route 29, one mile north of Alligator Alley and has 18 wild animals in his backyard which are cougars. He stated that the Florida Panther, so called, is a cougar, adding that it is not a panther which is a leopard or a jaguar. He stated that the Florida Panther does not exist. He reported that there are 27 sub-species of cougar, adding that these animals are not necessarily the endangered species. He stated that the Endangered Species Law is a very flexible situation and because of it, the Sta~e is going to build fences and underpasses and spend millions of dollars to protect the Florida Panther which does not exist and that nobody can prove is a Florida sub-species. Mr. Bob Shank, Assistant Chief of East Naples Fire Department, stated that there is a problem with access to Alligator Alley and that is their m~in concern as they are under contract to serve a portion of this property, adding that a fence would hinder their response time further. He stated that there is a problem for all emergency services and asked that a fence not be allowed. Page 29 ~ ,- -.,: --4. .~..-f-~' -"'_"__"""'1" .<I.·.,t~< . ~~ ".~, ",;~., ., .... .. ~ . , , " .. .. .. - Apr il 15, 1986 Mr. Nichel stated that Mr. Colding was supposed to appear but has not been able to make it, adding that his message would be that if the Federal Government buys all the land that they plan to buy that would be fenced, it would take a tremendous amount of taxes off the Collier County tax roll an~ it would have to be replaced with something like increasing everybody's taxes in Collier County. He stated that the action that is rcquested is that the Board advise the State and Federal departments that the solemn agreements made with the County government, landowners and citizens cannot be broken; that the 1-75 project with fences be stopped at Naples or that the 1-75 project proceed without fences; that condemnation and purchase of private lands cease; and that any agreements through purchases thus far made by the Department of Transportation be rescinded. Commissioner Hasse stated that he agrees that the people in the area have no access to their property without the use of Alligator Alley, adding that he feels that there is an obligation and respon- sibility to the people that live in the area. Mr. George Keller, reçresenting the Collier County Civic Federation, stated that his interest is the right of an owner to be able to use his own land. He stated that he does not know if Collier County can afford to put an access road to State Road 29 and he does not know if the people expect that, but he feels that if the State can afford to spend the money to put underpasses in for panthers, the money should be ava ilable to put'in overpasses so that &OOK 093' PAG[ 3'31 Page 30 ., ~,~''',.~.'_".....,<.~.,'-------..-.,;. &oOK 09'J pm 332 April 15, 1986 the people on the south side of Alligator Alley can get to the north side of Alligat?r Alley and get into Naples. He stated that after permitting people to build out there, it is not right to isolate them. He stated that the Chairman of the Commission should write a , ' letter to the DOT and the Governor stating that something has to be done for these people as they have a right to be able to use their own property. Mr. E. Lamar Richardson stated that if these projects have to be built, they are going to built. He stated that someone knows what is going to happen and he would just like to be informed. He stated' that the toll gate and the cloverleaf is a physcological barrier to keep people from building out there and if there is no fence and the toll is taken down, people will start building immediately and the Governor knows this. He stated that people are not going to keep the big developers out because all the water is out there, adding that everything that is needed is out there, the location for the new airport is there. He stated that it does not make sense to hamper the majority so that a few people can live out there. He stated that he sees nothing wrong with letting the law of nJtural consequence take place and remove the toll which is prob~bly ille- gal. He stated that when the time comes, there will be enough people out there and the road will be necessary and the tax money will be available and there will be no need to worry about access roads or overpasses. He stated that it is necessary to have the Page 31 , , u. - _. ''i'./~~¡.,. ~ ~. ,~~ :~ , ¡(,~:... ~--_._--_... ,",--._,,-~,---_... .. .. .. <,' . ',,'.> April 15, 1986 roads rather than hamper the farmers by causing them to travel an extra 20 miles around to get to market. Commissioner Pis tor stated that if Alligator Alley is four-laned the toll comes off, because there cannot be ð toll on Federal roads. He stated that the Commissioners recognize the problem, adding that he has spent a lot of time in Tallahassee about this matter. He stated that the DOT is working with the Federal Government in trying to get the Alley four-laned. He stated that they hav~ indicated by resolutions and letters to Tallahassee that they do not think that it should be fenced, Tape t8 Transportation Director Archibald stated that he ie in the pro- cess of trying to set up a meeting with DOT to address the issue of access and drainage concerns that the County has, adding that there will be public roads that will be affected by the proposed changes. He stated that he is not in a position to make any recommendations or to see what provisions the State will make to address access for Golden Gate Estates. He stated that he would like to gain ~pproval to see if Mr. Fixel, the County's attorney who handles condemnation suits, could be at the meeting to advise the County of their rights and what avenue could be considered to address this problem. Commissioner Holland stated that there is not time to wait for these meetings and question~d if County Attorney Cuyler read the agreement that was signed in 1964, to which Coúnty Attorney Cuyler &OOK ()f)3PAr,t~~~ Page 32 &oDK 093 mt 334 April 15, 1986 replied affirmatively, adding that he needs time to che~k the background of this matter, Commissioner Holland stated that people donated the right-of- way, they had an agreement that there would be access every two miles regardless of what happens as far as four-laning of that road in the future. He stateõ that he has attended the Governor's Con- ference on this same project and so has Commissioner Pistor, but the time has come when something has to be done about it. He stated that everyone is oppnscd to this fencing from the people th~~'live there to all the services that have to use the area. He stated that' if the Federal Government wants to put this fence in along both sides of Alligator Alley then let the State and Federal Government agree to put access roads in on both sides of the road to the end of the Collier County line. Mr. Robert Woods stated that he lives in the area and has all the services that are needed. He stated that he calls the fires in from out there, calls the Sheriff's Department if needed and any other type of emergency service. He stated that he has a radio and gets messages and calls them in. He stated that they live out there because they want to. He noted that the only real issue is whether to let the State and Federal Government disregard the agreement that was made with the property owners along State Road 84. He stated that anyone that lives out there and works, it cost $400 a year in tolls, and the people feel that they have built that road. He Page 33 \, .' '~:' ~.. ~.,. , .'. ...'~~ í" "'-"'¡';'. , ~~. '.,-' - - - " Apr il 15, 1986 stated that if the Covernment does no~ live up to their agreement, then the property owners should not live up theirs and they should be able to take their land back and fence it off as it is a breach of contract. commissioner Voss stated that there are two issue~, one is leq~l and one is practical, adding that the legal one needs to Þe answered by the County ~ttorney after he researches the agreements, but ln the meantime, he would make a motion that the Commlssion dlrect the Chairman to write a :.tter to the Department of Transportation and nopies to the Governor, Senators, and anyone else that should receive one, saying that many people that live along Alllgator Alloy or who own property along Alligator ~lley as well as the emergency servlcos of this County are deeply concerned about access to this highway when it is four-laned and becomes 1-75 and ask the Department of Transportation to advise the county as to what steps are being taken to ensure this access. Commissioner Hasse seoonded the motion. Upon call for the question, the motion oarried unani- lIously. Item U8 STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR HTE UTILITY BILLING SOFTWARE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $44,000 AND FOR IBM SYSTEM 38 HARDWARE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $143,000 IN ~CCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CONSULTANTS Ms. Shelia Logg of Deloitte, Haskins & Sells stated that they are present to talk about the evaluation and selection process and recommendation for a utility billing system. ~OOK 093'PAr,! 3"35 Page 34 &OOK 093 Pir.: 336 April 15, 1986 Ms. Linda Sherman of Deloitte, Haskins & Sells stated that they conducted a thorough evaluation of the utilities operation which consisted of several steps. She stated that a detailed review of the existing utility system was done as well as the of2rations of the Utility Department with the purpose to develop functional requirements for utility billing. She noted that the findings were documented in a report that was presented in February. She stated that the functional requirements were used to develop a request for proposal which was forwarded to vendors in 1986. She indicated that five rcsponses were received which were evaluated in detail, adding that a very comprehensive evaluation was made on each of these five responses and all the vendors were invited in to make presentations. She stated that based on the detailed evaluation, it was found that none of the five solutions proposed by the vendors met all the requirements for the County, at which point, it was recommended to the County Manager that th~ County consider looking at other utility billing software. She stated a package that is developed by HTE, Incorporated out of Orlando was found to be a very comprehensive utility billing system, She stated that it is therefore, their recommendation that the County enter into a contract with HTE for utility billing software which runs on an IBM System 38 and they also recommend that the County enter into a contract with IBM for the System 38 hardware. County Manager Lusk stated that the IBM 38 was one that was selected through the bidding process, adding that it was only the Page 35 .~.., , . ...' ...*" ,._-,...."...~.'<".,.'".".,,~_.~.........- - - - .~1(. ." .Í': '(, .' '.',,~.,., April 15, 1986 software that was not selected through the bidding process. He stated that basically the consultants a~e saying to reject all the software bids but to accept the hardware bids. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commlssioner Holland, that a contract be negotiated with HTE for the utllity billi~g software in an amount not to exceed $44,000 and that a contract be negotiated with IBM tor the System 38 hardware ln an amount not to exceed $143,000, and the Chairman be authorlzed to execute the necessary papers. Commissioner Holland questioned if the mandatory trash collec- tion could be incorporated into this same system, to which County Manager Lusk stated that one of the things about the System 38 is that there is software for the solid waste collection. Ms. Logg stated that the HTE system incorporates mandatory trê3h collection as well, adding that it would be part of the system. She stated that currently there are about 12,000 customers, adding that she specified that the s1stem should be able to handle 50,000 custo- mers and this system will do so. She stated that it is a public utility type of system. Mr. Dave Phillips and Amanda Brown of NCR Corporation stated that they have had some concerns in terms of the evaluation and questioned why the original vendor proposals were thrown out? Ms. Logg stated that there was a lot of different criteria that needed to be figured out to determine which system was optimal, &OQ( 093" PAGl337 Page 36 ._------,,-._,....~"'"',,--.,"'......... ..~"h,,..¡_""''''..,.,'';·,,.\'''·:"'$1I<1,.''';"'...."'._,,.,,...'''''""'''_..._...,;.,..'-"""._""'-.......·,......"',."'.....,,_,0,"_.,.'..... ,......."..",o""""_^"~~q._~...".,.~",.."...~.,,_"'~ aOOK 093 PAGt 338 April 15, 1986 adding that there were several factors that eliminated certain ven- dors. Mr. Olliff stated that the consultants made a recommendation that the software that was bid on all five accounts did not meet the criteria that was specified in the RFP process, adding that the Board is the one that will actually have to reject the bids as far as the software is concerned. Mr. Phillips stated that his concern as a vendor is that he was not aware of a lot of activity outside of the RFP that they had been given and they were, therefore, spending significant amounts of energy to address the RFP as it was given to him. He stated that he appreciates the highest ranking. Ms. Logg stated that it was intended that enough proposed solu- tions be rcturned so that one could be picked, but unfortunately, she did not feel comfortable with anyone solution to recommend it to the County Mandger for implementation. Mr. Phillips questioned if the Steering Committee participated in the decision making process, to which Ms. Logg replied negati- vely. Mr. Phillips stated that he feels that this is an area of exposure that the County does not have which is a steering committee approval g¡0Jp that vendors can bring their products to and demonstrate them and continually update them. He stated that he finds that this is advantageous for the vendors and the County as well so that there is not a lot of questions when the decisions are made. Page 37 " ;'. .. - - ........,.,,_,... ...."..,~.'""""''',.'"._,.~._,____-----..i ~. ~ . - - - t. April 15, 1986 Ms. Logg stated that there is a Steering Committee in place and has been in place throughout the project, but they did not par- ticipate in the evaluation process. She stated that they did hear about the recommendations. Assistant County Manager Oorrill stated that Deloitte, Haskins & Sells was retained to provide the sole technical expertise and the County had a Steering Committee that was made up of members of the County Manager's office and Division Heads and then there was a sub- committee that was made up of the Acting Purchasing Director, the County Manager, and the two assistant County Manager's who have responsibility for all of the Divisions that made up the Steering Committee and in addition, they were all members of that same Steering Committee. Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that in addition to the Steering Committee, Deloitte, Haskins & Sells performed all the technical and the matrixes evaluations of the proposals that the County received and in addition to meeting with the Steering Committee, they met with an Executive Committee that was comprised of the County Manager, two assistants, and the Acting Purchasing Director. Tape '9 Upon call for the question, the motion carried unanimoualy. ~oow; 093 F~r.( 339 Page 38 ~ ....""".."".""""'".,",;.,,,,,.......,,,.,,;,."',,,,_..._"'...........,--,.._-_._....,,"""""'''__;'''''''~'''''~''''''''~_'_''''""'''"~"_''''__''-''"",..~^~..,.,,"",·',.',·,,"0 lOOK 09a PA~! 3'40 Apr il 15, 1986 ;: Item '19 SPBCIAL MEBTING SCHBDULED FOR MAY 29, 198' RE 201 FACILITIES PLAN AT 9100 A.M. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that he is aSking for approval to have a special meeting on May 29,at 9:00 A.M. regarding the 201 Facilities Plan. He stated that he has advertised for this date. He stated that this will be the up-date to make the County . ' grant eligible. Commi8sloner plstor direoted that there be a ,speoial .eeting on May 29, 1986, at 9:00 A.M. regarding the 201 Faoilities Plan. Item 120 UHIB HUEY AIRCRAFT TO BE SOLD FOR $150,000 AND BELL LONGRANGER HELICOPTER TO BE PURCHASED FOR $~OO,OOO Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that at the beginning of the budget he was in hopes of being able to sell the County's 25 year old Huey helicopter that was purchased about 11 years ago for $5,000. He stated that an original estimate was prepared for budget purposes in the hopes of trying to sell it for about $150,000. He noted that he received a top offer after several months of adver- tising, of $105,000 cash for the Huey and its associated parts from the Lee County Mosquito Control District. He reported that Staff has recognized that since last year, the lease/purchase interest rates have fallen approximately 3-4\, adding that the estimated cost of the used out newer type of helicopter, which is the Bell 206 Longranger I, is in the vicinity of $400,000 which would be about Page 39 f !(' .:t...._ .. - .. ' ""'·..·~'...""O.H·__"·._._.........>'.~.·O.."''''..~....o;,..,_·_.....,,___'''''',,,'"""".~""'_ ¡..."""."-,_.-_",-,._....¡---,,..,.,""""",~~,'~-"' .... 0 :-;;.. ~~t .~: ,;'~,,{i ':'!." ,~ - - .. April 15, 1986 $6,200 per month or $71,000 per year on a lease/purchese. He stated that an option would be and he would recommend to purch~se the aircraft outright as the County would save around $62,000 in interest over the period of time thet is involved. He stated thet with regards to the operating cost of the Huey that the County now has and the helicopter that they have been looking at, the Huey requires about 75 gallons per engine hour and the new helicopter requires about 33 gallons per hour, adding that this is a signifi- cant decrease in the operating costs. He stated that with regards to insurence, if the County under the original lease proposal pursued the insurance, Bell had indicated that for their private customers it would be about $50,000 a year, but the County could self-insure and it would reduce the amount considerably. He noted that late yesterday he received a telephone call from Habberfield Helicopters, which is in Dade County indicating that they would like to make an offer on the Huey. He stated that he received a letter from lIabberfield Helicopters this morning that indicated that the letter is confirmation of the company's bid of $112,500 for the UHIB Huey Aircraft, along with a 5\ deposit. He stated that a gentleman from Habberfield Helicopters arrived at the County Complex this morning and looked the Huey over and indicated that they have an immediate need for it and are willing to offer the County the full $150,000 that was originally asked. He stated that this bid is $45,000 higher than the highesl bid that was received. He stated SOOK 093'P4~~ 3'41 Page 40 ,...."",...,.."_..;....'-1' ~","', ",._"~_'N..'·".._-,~_ -.- &DOI( 093 PAGE 342 April 15, 1986 that this would be cash on delivery and the gentlemen would like closing as soor. as ý~ssib~e. Commissioner Holland stated that there is a cost differential of 42 gallons per hour and questioned how many hours the Huey was flown last year, to which Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated very few, adding that therc is normally about 300 hours per year budgetcd. He statcd that last year t~ i helicopter was out of com- mission for about 3 or 4 months during the summer, adding that there was about $40-50,000 spent on the engine. Commissioner Holland stated that the engine was then sent to Texas to have it certified as zero hours. He questioned how much modifiçation the County will have to do to the new helicopter, to which Mr. Dorrill stated that the only thing it does not include is the emergency control and the police radios that are currently in the Huey and will be removed, He stated that the County will have to purchase a highpower search light as the one that is on the Huey is not easily transferrable. Commissioner Holland 5tated that the Huey has been brought up to as near perfect condition as possible, adding that the only benefit he can see by selling the Hucy is to allow EMS to collect for calls. County Manager Lusk stated that in the future there would have to be new bladcs put on the Huey, which is why Lee County reduced their offer to $105,000. He stated that a lot of money has been spent on the engine, but there is still a lot of money to be spent on a 25 year old helicQpter. Page 41 - - -' 1*1 111. 'V ..... III ,,_ ,."--"-~~"" '" ,<¡; <jr .....-JI, ",l-4:" - - - Apr il 15, 1986 Commissioner Holland stated that new blades were put on the Huey that were supposed to be good for 2,000 houre. He stated that to purchase a new helicopter at a rate of $75,000 a year plus the cost of operation in order to collect for a few emergency helicopter trips does not make sense to him. He noted that there are a lot of helicopters that are 25 years old and still flying and in demand. Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that the operation of the new helicopter would be almost half that of the Huey and it has never been the intention to use this helicopter solely as an EMS helicopter. He statp.d that this may be the best use of it, but it will be used for other things as well. In answer to Commissioner Holland, Mr. Dorrill stated that there is an air worthiness certificate that involves FAA certification of all the parts and all the components. He stated that military aircraft do not have air worthiness certificates and they ðo not conform or meet the FAA standards and if the County was going to keep a helicopter and continue to use it for EMS, one should be purchased that could be used in billing purposes. Commissioner Hasse quel3ti...deà how old the Bell Longrangcr Helicopter is, to which Mr. Dorrill stated that of all the ones that they looked at, most of them that are in the appropriate price range were manufactured in 1981 or 1982. He stated that one that he looked at has a new engine in it and only has ~ engine hours on it sin~e it has been overhauled. He noted that the blades are built &001( 093' mt 343 Page 42 -~"_."-"-"-,,,-,,,--,,,,,,,,>=-,,,,,^~,,.".,...,.:,..,,.,,.,,,.".,, m, 093 PAGt 344 Apr,n 15, 1986 different on this ty;¡e of helicopter with the life requirements being about 5,000 hours. Commissioner Voss stated that the longer the Huey is kept, the less value it is going to have and if the helicopter program is going to be maintained another helicopter needs to be purchased. He stated that the spread between the purchase price of a new one and the sale price of the old one is going to widen every year con- siderably. commissioner Basse mov.~, .econ~ed by Commissloner Voss an~ oarri.~ 4/1, (Commis,ioner Hollan4 opposed), that the UH1B Huey Airoraft be .ol~ for $150,000 and the Sell Longranger Helioopter be purchased for $400,000. Commissioner Voss questioned if this amount of money was budgeted this year, to which Mr. Dorrill stated that it was budgeted in anticipation that it could be sold for S150,000 and lease payments made for the balance of thie year and next year. In answer to where the money will come from, Fiscal Officer Giles stated that there is money in the General Fund Contingency, as there is a balance of $2,212,588. He stated that the helicopter should be purchased directly rather than financing it with a lease. 'l'ape 110 Item t21 ROUTINE SILLS - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Pursuant to Resolution 81-150, the following checks were issued through Friday, April 11, 1986, in payment of routine bills: Page 43 - - -' __"''',...''''_''"''_____-..,'''_~~,._..<e.,#_.'.·.'*"."..''''.'''''''''....""w..~"",·~...",'.__"~,""~..·.,, ,". ,f:~ - - .. CHECK DESCRIPTION CHECK NOS. Apr 11 15, 1986 AMOUNT Vendors 141678 - 141900 $875,921. 03 Item 122 BUDGET AMENDMENTS 86-230, 86-231, AND 86-235 - ~DOPTED commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Budget ~endments 86-230, 86-231, and 86-235 be adopted. *****The following items were adopted and/or approved under the Consent Agenda by motion of Commissioner Voss, seconded by commlssioner Goodnight and oarried unanimously:***** Item '23 CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE SATISFACTION OF LIEN RB F. V. GARCIA AND MARIA GARCIA AMADOR, MARCO ISLAND UNIT 2, BLOCX 56, LOT 3 See Page ..i.,0 Item '24 EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.244 - SWAMP BUGGY DAYS, INC. - SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS Item '25 PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCB O:F IMPROVEMENTS :FOR WATER OAKS ~T WYNDEMERE AND PLAT APPROVED FOR RECORDING! Item 12 6 REVISED GRANT APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE FOR THE ELDERLY :FUND - AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH AREA AGENCY ON AGING D/B/A THE COUNCIL FOR HUMAN SERVICES OF SOUTH CENTRAL :FLORIDA, INC. - REVISION TO COUNTY BUDGET See Pages .3.5"1 ,~jSa. ·&O~K 093' PAGt 3'45 Page 44 .,. , ..,.,"'=.,-<"þ."'......~'"-,...-,_._,."'."'..._..-' &OOK 093m(3'46 Apr 11 15, 1986 Item 127 AMENDMENT TO GRANT APPLICATION/BUDGET OF THE OLDER AMERICAN ACT PROGRAM TO REfLECT GRAMM-RUDMAN-HOLLINS DECREASE See Page' 353 Item '28 APPROVAL TO APPLY fOR A GRANT FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO PROVIDE LUNCHES fOR IMMOKALEE srn~R RECREATION PARTICIPANTS I' I , Item 129 SEWER fACILITIES ACCEPTED fOR OWNERSHIP, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE PINES Recorded in Book 1189, Page 1303 - 1311 Item '30 BID '86-954 FOR MONITORING WELL SAMPLING EQUIPMENT - AWARDED TO SCHURR INDUSTRIES IN THE AMOUNT of $4,315. Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 12, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids ~ere received until 2:30 P.M., April 2, 1986, for monitoring well sampling equipment, Item 131 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES FOR FOXFIRE UNIT 3, MULTI-FAMILY TRACT 6 Recorded in O.R. Book 1189, Pages 1312 - 1331 Item '32 AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT TO UNITED TELEPHONE SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,500 FOR TERMINATION FEES Page 45 ," , - - -,._.~.,..,.. ..........'" ,..~ ... ~"......""-.._>,_....""",~,,,,"-'."--'~'" :.... .....j, . ''''';'1 "1":.( , ..~. > :~' ': (.. ,.. -'''..",....;"......,..."."-"-,-".'',~,,,".~,..,;..,.''",,., "",,"","""'-". - .. .. April 15, 1986 Item '33 RESOLUTION 86-62 ESTABLISHING A SYSTBM OP PERSONNEL ADMINIST~TION FOR THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT See pages ~5'f-_3..55' Item '34 CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLL 19a5 No. 243 Dated 04/04/86 1985 No. 180 Dated 04/04/86 Tangible Personal Property Nos. 1985-160/165 Dated 04/04-04/08/86 Dated 04/09/86 No. 1985-167 Item 135 EXT~ GAIN TIME FOR INMATE NOS. 48062, 49131, AND 48906 Item '36 DUPLICATE TAX CERTIFICATE NO. 2625 ISSUED TO GUY L. CARLT~N DUE TO LOSS See Page ....3-5"0 Item 137 MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILBD AND OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that tbe following correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below: BOO1( 09aw~347 Page 46 a... 1 j._~,~........_",.~",,,"""'''''''''''Þ<tI,',(,,,·~"._,,,_,..!,,,,,,....,w_"""~,...,"..____",_"~,~",..",_..,,..,,,,,",,~.._,_,,,,,,,,'w,,........_"_,·'."""0', "'0'. ')""""",....,',._-~~.,-_._,-, &00'; 093mt348 April 15, 1986 1. Letter dated 03/11/86 from William J. Reagan, Clerk of Courts, enclosing a copy of Report No. 1-86-2, which is a review of the Fleet Mgmt. Dept. Referred to BCC and filed. 2. Letter dated 03/21/86 to County Manager from Ms. Frankie L. Rimes, Dist. Secretary, Collier Soil & Water Conscrvation District, enclosing their Quarterly Activity and Financial Report. Referred to Budget Office, BCC and filed. 3. Lctter dated 03/26/86 to Personnel Officer, from Dennis E. Nye, Director, Dept, of Administration, stating that in accordance with Ch. 85-305, Laws of Fl., the Dept. of Adm. has chosen first National Life Ins. Co. to administer a Medicare Supplement Policy for all eligible retirees of a state or local public employer. Referred to Herb Luntz, Sherry Rynders and filed. 4. Letter dated 04/01/86 from Tom Lewis, Jr., AlA Architect, Dept. of Community Affairs, enclosing a draft of the proposed procedural rule (9J-11) for the review of local comprehensive plans, and advising of workshop, Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. 5. Letter dated 03/28/86 from Ralph R. Clark, P.E., P.L.S., Chief, DNR, re DBS86-l45, Mr. John Donahue for a Coastal Construction permit. Referred to Vickie Mullins, Dr. Proffitt and filed. 6. Memo dated 03/20/86 from James C. Ciles, C.P.A. re Carry forward at 10/01/85, Per Audit. Referred to BCC and filed. 7. Memo dated 03/26/86 from James C. Giles, C.P.A. re 1985 Annual Financial Report to Comptroller, and enclosing same. Referred to Lori Zalka. 8. Minutes - Filed. City of Naples - 03-05-86 and 03-19-86 EMSAC - 03-12-86 & agenda for 04-09-86 9. Petition dated 03/31/86 from residents & property owners adjoining Section of Gordon River requesting "No Wake" signs. Referred to BCC, Neil Dorrill, Tom Kuck an1 filed. 10. Public Service Commizsion Order Revising Fuel Adjustmcnt Factor received 04/04/896 re Docket No. 8600l-EI, Order No. 15923. Filed. 11. Letter received 03/21/86 from Bobby Poklemba, Redi-Plants Page 47 ' "'" ~. - - -. '",.._",,",,,",",,,,,,,'_''''R___>'_ _-..,-""'....,....__.._.........,'""''''-,......,-"..,'-._'"".,.~...-....,''~_.''"'~~".._.,_.,'..__."._-_....""';,"-~.._- - - - i' ) J ¡,.. ¡.. April 15, 1986 Corp. edvising of expansion to be built onto their seed house and requesting exemption from Impact Fee charges. Referred to BCC, Don Lusk, Neil Dorrill, Joe Magri and filed. 12. Letter dated 04/01/86 from Robert L. Patton, Co~troller, Tax Collector, advieing of the distribution of Current Ad Valorem Tax to the BCC end ettaching distribution recap showing year to date totalo for 19083/84, 2984/85 and 1985/86. Referred to Lori Zalka. *** There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair: Time 4:40 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ., '\)'ùAR{j 0 ,,,>. .' I' . ./ : '" tb ...J -.....,~.{ c:;. .A'~EST:""'·. <' ~ :1'ÍILtr',(M J. A~N, CLERK ~ :, ~~t; , ,. . ~n!~ .' .'.,f g.Er/;¡ PISTOR, CHAIRMAN 3~lI\~ These minutes a~rove~ as presented ~ or as »t(/~/7r-G by the Board on corrected ð,ooK 093' PAGE 3'49 Page 48 ..,.1..' ',," ','"\ .';\"..' .. ¡ . (.. { ---_..~- --_\.--"""""""'..._"""'_....,..,~..,. , . .. . "'"') ~ "_" ._"".""".,.·...',·.,,þ'".~...ffM...'''·_·.__·,,·w.~_'__..