Loading...
BCC Minutes 04/29/1986 R Naples, Florida, April 29, 1986 LET IT DE REMEMDERED, that the Board ~f County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULÄR SESSION in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the foll0wing members pr~sent: CHAIRMAN: John A. Pistor VICE-CHAIRMAN: Anne Goodnight Frederick J. Voss Max A. Hasse C. C. "Red" Holland ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Fiscal Officer; Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerk; Donald B. Lusk, County Manager; Neil Dorrill, Assistant "- Count~Manager; Pam Brangaccio, Deputy Assistant County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Tom Kuck, Public Works Administrator; Vickie Mullins, Community Development Administrator; Ann McKim, Barbara Çacchione, David Weeks, and Charles Gauthier, Planners; Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; Dave Pettrow, Zoning/Planning Director; Pat Carroll, Plannning & Contracts Engineer; Dr. Edward Proffitt, Natural Resources Management Director; Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Chief Ray Barnett, Sheriff's Department. Page I &DC~· 093 w·t 502 _·..O"...._·,,·.,....._"'·,__,..,_"~,"."W_^"".... _.....IOU ""-"--,-..-->.,,,,,.,"",.... · // &OOK 09J· PÂ~l 50.9 Apr il 29, 1986 Tape '1 Item '1 ~aENDA - APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: Commissioner Vo.. moved, .econded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimouSly, that the agenda be approved with the following changes: a. Item 9Cl regarding renaming Golden Gate Community Park to be heard at 9:30 A.M. b. Item 9£3 - re selection of underwriter for bond refinancing issues - Added by County Manager. c. Last item on agenda to be the interview of two firms re beach renourishment. Item 12 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWÄRDS - PRESENTED Commissioner Pistor presented Employee Service Awards to the following employees: Linda Denning - Agriculture Joseph Breeden - Transportation Marquita King - Public Works 5 years 10 years 5 years ',~ "- " Item 13 PROCLAMATION EXTENDING CONGRATULATIONS TO JAN BENNETT ON BEING NAMED "HOME ECONOMIST OF THE YEÄR" - ADOPTED Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner piator moved, seconded by Commissioner Voas and carried unanimously, that the proclamation extending congratulations to Jan Dennett on being named "Home Economist of the Year" be adopted. Page 2 - - - . . &ODK 093 w.~ 511 April 29, 1986 Item 14 RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE IMMO~LEE LAND USE STUDY - ACCEPTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ADDITIONAL STAFF. RESOLUTION 86-69 DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON ENFORCEMENT OF VIOLATIONS IN IMMOKALEE - ADOPTED. STÄFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE A STUDY FOR THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING THIS PROGRAM ÄND BRING BÄCK TO BCC ON MAY 13, 1986 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 13, 1986 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the Immokalee Land Use Study. Planner Gauthier stated that on October 1, 1985, the Board imposed a moratorium on the enforcement of certain zoning violations in several defined areas of the Immokalee community, adding that the morðtorium was put into effect until April 1, 1986, to allow Staff to conduct a Land Use Study and create a Master Plan. He stated that an Immokalee Land Use Study has been completed with the assistance of a 21 member Ad Hoc Committee composed of representatives of the com- munity. He stated that there were four different committee meetings with this group and in addition, there was a public hearing with tK~, Planning Commission as wzll as a public workshop in Immokalee. He stated that the Land Use Study is the first step toward an Immokalee Master Plan with the focus being on certain obvious land use problems. He stated that coverage will be expanded at a later date to a broader range of issues. He reported that on April 2, 1986, a public workshop was held to brief the Planning Commission on the study and there was a great deal of discussion by the Ad Hoc Committee as we~l as the general public, adding that the Planning Commission acted ~~on the Page 3 - - - "''''''''''.''''''';''",-'o",.,*,~".,.".___.... " -"'-""'."",,"-"'_.,"_..._-,----..--~'''~ Apr il 29, 1986 staff recommendations regarding the Land Use Study on April 17, 1986. He reported that there are recommendations that will guide the Division of Community Development on enforcement priorities, amend the Housing and Zoning ordinances, continue the moratorium on enforcement of certain zoning violations while the zoning ordinance is evaluated, and a further study of other problems. He stated that he is seeking authorization to initiate certain work that will be brought back to the Board. He stated that there are five issue areas which were prioritized, noting that the housing issue is the first one, which has 'four recommendations. He stated that the recommendations are to adopt and implement a minimum housing code the caliber of that contained " with the SQuthern Standard Building Code; establish a program with appropriate staffing level and implementation strategy to enforce the minimum housing code and, if adequate staff is not committed or funded ?y the County, it is recommended that a new housing code not be adop- ted; that as a part of the Comprehensive Plan, develop incentives for the private sector to en~~urage creation of low and mid-income housing and, in addition, p~ior to the redevelopment of the Comprehensive Plan, encourage ~nd assist development of 10w and mid- income housing, research the feasibility of reducing, suspending or deferring various review and/or permit fee, local tax assessments, impact fees, etc; and to immediately seek grants or other funding to provide low-income housing and address ~his issue as a part of the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the next issue deals with the &CC~ 09] p~,:! 512 Page 4 '-,--'-' ,._,.......~~~-<~..... . . -",..",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,-.,,", · . &OOK 09J I':'.! 51a Apr il 29, 1986 illegal storage of junk in industrial areas with the recommcndation being to ensure that all commercial junk yards in Immokalee have an occupational license, a~d to adopt and implement an ordinance that requircs that all commerci~l junk yards comply with buff~ring and screening standards within SlX months. He stated that prior to 1970, thcre was no zoning ordinance in Immokalee and between 197Q and 1982, thcrc was a separate zoning ordinance that was much weaker than the county-wide ordinance, adding that land uses that were established before 1970 without standards or between 1970 and 1982 under the old standards were grandfathered in. He noted that the third issue is non-industrial areas that have junk and Staff recommendation is to vigorously enforce Collier County code restrictions on the accumula- tion of garbage, trash or liquid wastes; that enforcement should be based on a priority system with top priority on junk in the right-of- way; food, garbage and perishables and junk highly vidible from thç ..... street; and to investigate strengthening penalties for non-compliancè with the code. He indicated that another issue is the non-conforming land uses with recommendations to declare a moratorium on enforcement of principal use violations in the six areas identifj~d in Exhibit "An for a six month period; to initiate procedures to evaluate rezoning of the areas identified in Exhibit "A" with each affected property owner being contacted; to initiate procedures to evaluate rezoning of the Village Residential District areas within the Commercial Node iden- tified in Exhibit "B" with each affected property owner being contac- Page 5 ...... - - ...-..-.""", "'~'-""-"""'~"- - ._,...."~.._-----------, .. - - Apr il 29, 1986 ted; and as a par~ of the Comprehensive Plan, the redevelopment of central Immokalee should be considered. He reiterated that another issue of concern is illegal parking of commercial vehicles in residen- tial areas with the recommendb~ions to declare a moratorium on enfor- cement of restrictions on parking of commercial vehicles and equipment for RMF-6, MHSD and MHRP zoning districts in Immokalee for a six month period; to continue work with the Ad Hoc Committee to devise a satis- factory method of reducing parking restrictions and a new lower level of restriction while allowing neighborhood choice; and to vigorously .enforce parking restrictions in the right-of-way. Commissioner Pistor stated that the property owner should be notified but all the residents should be notified because they are the ones that will be affected and in the residential villag~ area, most of the property owners are not the residcnts. Planner Gauthier stated that the main issues have been identified and there are other problems that Staff would like to continue to work on as there are streets that are not named, houses with no addresses have caused problems with emergency services in the community, adding that a survey should be conducted to assess the nceds and cost of improving the situation. He stated that legal access has been found to be an issue as many existing and proposed èwelling units have questionable legal aç~ess or completely lack legal access and Staff would like to study....,; sand br ing something back to the Board. He stated that Staff woul~ like to look at the whole concept of village &OO~ 09;Jp~(.1514 Page 6 . . -~"""","-~ .,-, --, aOOK 093 w.~ 515 April 29, 1986 residential zoning districts as most of the problems are occurring there and it should be readdressed and suggestions brought back. He stat~d that non-conforming uses cannot be expanded or rebuilt and a lot of people are locked in with what the previous zoning ordinance allowed, adding that Staff would also like to study this issue, and the last issue that was identified was the grandfathering of uses which needs to be studied. He stated that the needs of Immokalee are immense and through the Land Use Study problems have been identified and through research independent of the Land Use Study, additional problems have been identified, adding that the needs of Immokalee far exceed those recognized prior to this Land Use Study effect and it is far beyond the capacity of the current staff to address these problems. He noted that frustration was frequently visible and voca- lized by various Ad Hoc Committee members concerning the futility of their efforts and contributions if adequate staff would not exist to '. implement and enforce recommended changes, adding that current staffing levels cannot provide for timely implementation and enfor- cement. He stated that the staff necessary for the implementation and enforcement of the recommended changes will be submitted as an expanded service for Fiscal Year 86-87 per direction of the County Manager's Office, which is the current policy of the County Manager's office at this point in time of the 1986 fiscal year. He noted that Staff would like to undertake these matters, prioritize the enfor- cement, do additional studies, and work on rezoning but there is not Page 7 - - - --~._._-_.__....--+ - .., - April 29, 1986 enough staff to do everything, but he is req~esting additional staff during part of the normal budget process. Commissioner Voss questioned how much Staff is being considered, to which Community Development Administrator Mullins stated that there would be a planner and zonin) investigator for the Im'.lokalee area only. She stated that for the Housing Section and the Grants, addi- tional people will be needed and that will be submitted as part of the regular budget. Commissioner Voss stated that he has become aware of some of the problems in Immokalee and he feels that Staff should proceed with the Study. 't9mmissioner Pis tor questioned if there are grants that are available or that Staff is ~pplying for with regards to the low-income housing, to which Community Development Administrator Mullins stated that the funding cycle that the County has generally applied for and appears to be the only grant that has been applied for in the past, is for rehabilitation of housing, adding that this funding cycle is in December of each year. She stated that in the meantime, there are other grants through DCA which the County can compete for, adding that currently the necessary data and information has net been obtained to apply for those grants. She stated that there other 1rants through various organizations for small amounts of money which is something that is being checked into. She stated that as part of the budget year, she is recommending consultant funds to be available to hire &OC( U9.)i'J,;,516 Page 8 , . " &DDK 093 1':<.: 51? Apr il 29, 1986 someone to prepare the large grant packages. Tape 42 The fOllowing people spoke in favor of the Immokalee Land Use Study Charlotte Westman John Witchger Ed Oates George Keller Jackie Williams Deputy Assistant County Manager Brangaccio stated that Community Development Administrator Mullins requested a position, but it has been the position of the County Manager's Office that all requests for additional positions be deferred until it is reviewed by the Board at the budget hearings in July. Commissioner Pis tor stated th~t if these positions are approved during the budget hearings, it should be taken into consideration that the process be started before October. Commissioner Voss stated that this process should be started imme- '- diately as the situation is only going to get worse in Immokalee and' it l~ a high priority in the County and it should be approved so that Staff can go forward at this time. County Manager Lusk stated that the budget proce3S is the appropriate way to address this item, adding that there is a lot of pressures on the budget this year, such as the Sheriff asking for $100,000 for a new program, a Growth Management Act that will cost about $800,000, which is why his office recommended that no additional positions be filled until budget time. He stated that once the budget Page 9 - - - - - - Apr i1 29, 1986 is reviewed, then the program could be started if it is necessary. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the staff recommendations regarding the Immokalee Land Use study be approved with the exception of addi- tional staf! for implementation and enforcement. Commissioner Holland questioned if the major farmers have been contacted and if they can live with what is being proposed this date? Zoning/Planning Director Pettrow stated that by December, 1987, tnere will have to be a specific land use map which will involve the Immokalee area and the farm land around it. He stated that this study primarily targets the central area in Immokalee and does not involve major land use changes, adding that a lot of this is remedies to address the immediate situation there, adding that this is also the first phase in the study as staff intends to continue no i~ conjunc- tion with the Growth Manag~ment Act mandate. He stated that if there are gOing to be major changes affecting the farmers it will not be for a few years. County Attorney Cuyler stated, with reference to t.he resolu- tion that needs to be adopted, there should be a clarification on Number 3 on the second page of the resolution, the words "upon expira- tion of the moratorium" should be added. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that ResOlution 86-69 declaring a moratorium on enforcement of violations in Immokalee be adopted. &OC~ D9a w/518 Page 10 ....,..--......"..«..." -,-.,...~'- · .' &ODK 0931':'" 519 Apr il 29, 1986 Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carriod unanimously, that staft be directed to prepare a study as to the cost of implementation of the program and bring it back to the Board in two weeks for consideration. Commissioner Hasse stated that he would like to know how this wil1 be financed, to which County Manager Lusk stated that it would be financed out of contingency money for the rest of the year. .~ '\. Page 11 - - - - .. - April 29, 1986 Item IS GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY PAR~ NAME TO REMAIN AS SUCH WITH THE SUB-CAPTION OF "SÄNTÄ BARBÄRA BLVD." Deputy Assistant County Manager Brangaccio stated that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board met on April 17, 1906, to give the public an opportunity to suggest names for the five community parks, adding that she attended the meeting and there were about five citizens there and the meeting had been advertised. She noted that the recommendation of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board was to rename the Golden Gate Community Park to Santa Barbara Park, Golden Gate Community and to "- retaiñ· the names of East Naples Community Park, Immokalee Community Park, North Naples Community Park and Marco Island Community Park. She reported that since that time, she was asked by the Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board to send this back to their next meeting because there have been several telephone calls and suggestions that have come up with regards to renamin~ Lhe Marco Island Community Park. Commissioner Hasse stated that it has already been voted on to name these parks and questioned what has to be done to reopen this matter? Deputy Assistant County Manager Srangaccio stated that this was brought before the Board about three weeks ago and another vote was taken to send this matter back to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Soard. &OCK ona ",r.! 524 Page 12 . , .aOOK 093 r:.~ 525 April 29, 1986 County Man~gcr Lusk stated that it started out at the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and then came before the Board and the Board recommenòation was to look into the matter and then bring it back to the Board. He stated that the Board has the right to change the name of a park if they so desire. ..^*. Receaa: 9:55 A.M. - Reconvened: 10:05 A.M. .**.* The following people spoke against renaming Golden Gate Community Park, noting that Golden Gate Park indicates the geographical area of the park and the need for recreational facilities for the future growth of Golden Gate, and further noting that th= Golden Gate area would not consider this park belonging to the people of Golden Gate if the name was changed to suit a developer simply because he is building a development around the park. Speakers indicated that they are not willing to pay for an MSTU to support a park that does not represent . Golden Gate community, and noted that the park is in ~he Golden Gat~~ district and the fire district and should be named as such. David Graham Lynda Hit.tinger Tape '3 Beatrice Gibbs Dorothy Johnson Mike Zewalk Simon Chapple Catherine D. Farrow Frank Horning Jim Melchore Charles Case Walter Holtgren Sara Schirmer Mae Adkisf;on John Doran Robert Locker ?alµh Partington \Jeorge Keller Gengette Melchore M. A. Barker Kathy Graham Alphonse Peloquin Tape H The following people spoke in favor of changing the name of Golden Gate Community Park to Santa Barbara Blvd. Park noting that this park Page 13 - - - - - .. April 29, 1986 is not for the exclusive use of the people of Golden Gate, it is a county-wide park for all the citizens and should be identified as to wher~ it is actually located, and where it will service as well as the geographic location, which is Santa Barbara Blvd. Don Myers John ^gnelli Sam Crimaldi Commissioner Hasse stated that this park should be called Golden Gate Community Park with a sub-caption underneath that states Santa Barbara Blvd. to indicate where it is located. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she had been working since 1976 to get five community parks and no one on the Parks & Recreation Board ',- was lnterested at the time in what they would be called. She stated that it was later determined that they should be named after the geographical area and that name has applied since. She stated that there is a Golden Gate neighborhood park and there is a Golden Gate Community Center and th~re may be problems with emergpncy u~its. She stated that it would be nice to call it the Golden Gate - Santa Barbara Community park. Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by Commisaioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the Golden Gate Park be named Golden Gate Community Park with a sub-caption Santa Barbara B:vd. Item f6 RESOLUTION 86-70 RE PETITION V-86-3, EARL G. HODGES FUNERAL CHAPEL, RE A 25 FOOT VÄRIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBÄCK ON THE SOUTHEÄBT CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF US-41 AND OHIO DRIVE _ ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 13, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with &OCK 093 ~'.~ 526 Page 14 · . aDOK OD3 r:'.: 527 Apr il 29, 1986 the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-86-3, filed by Earl G. Hodges Funeral Chapel, requesting a 25 foot variance fro~ the required front yard setback on the southeast corner of the intersection of U5-41 and Ohio Drive. Planner Weeks stated that the objective is to build an addition to an existing structure, adding that the subject property consists of four 75 foot by 200 foot 10ts and is zoned C-4. He noted that the existing structure was built in the 1950's and an addition built in the 1960's which ha~ a zero setback. He noted that the petitioner is proposing to build an addition at the corner with a "0" foot front setback. He indicated that the addition will provide additional office space, covered parking facilities for company vehicles, room for further expansion of the second floor, and privacy for certain business activities as well as a crematory. He stated that the sub- ject property is non-conforming with regards to parking, landscaping and buffer requirements, adding that the zorring ordinance allows .. ,~ alterations to non-conforming structures if the non-conformity is decreased but prohibits a1terations if the non-conformity i3 increased. He stated that the proposed addition would increase the non-conformity of the structure itself with regaL~3 to yard setbacks, but if the landscaping, buffering and parking were brought into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance then the non-conformity would be reduced. He noted that staff has no objection to the approval of this variance subject to the stipulations that the parking, landscaping and buffering be brought into conformity. Page 15 - - - .. .. .. April 29, 1986 Mr. Zewalk, representing the Pine Ridge Civic Association, stated that the Pine Ridge Civic Association has no objection to this peti- tion being approved. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-70 re Petition V-86-3, Earl G. Hodges Funeral Chapel be adopted sUbject to the property being in con- formance with the existing zoning ordinance with regards to parking, landscaping and buffering requirements. ;. &CCK OÐa1':'.r 528 Page 16 .. ~ .. Apr 11 29, 1986 :1r. Zewalk, representing the Pine Ridge Civic Association, stated that the Pine Ridge Civic Association has no objection to this peti- tion being approved. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the PUblic hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-70 re Petition V-S6-3, Earl G. Hodges Funeral Chapel be adopted sUbject to the property being in con- formance with the existing Zoning Ordinance with regards to parking, landscaping and buffering requirements. ~ .. &OCK ODJ,,~·., 528 Page 16 · , &OOK U9~J ~r.: ·531 April 29, 1986 Item 17 RESOLUTION 86-71 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH THE FDER DELEGATING TO COLLIER COUNTY THE DUTIES OF INSPECTING PÄCKAGE SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES - ÄDOPTED Environme~tal Science and Pollution Control Director Bill Lorenz statcd that this is a rcquest to enter into an agrecment with the FDER which will authorize the County to inspect package sewage treatment plants to determine th~ir compliance with DER's rules and laws, adding that this will help reach the goals of abating adverse effects that these facilities may have on the water resources of Collier County. He stated that in 1984 a referendum was approved that authorized funding for this program. fie stated that the agreement commits the County to inspect each package plant every 6 months to determine whether the facility is in compliance with DER rules. He stated that the agreemcnt defincs the package plant as being less than 500,000 gallons per day and not owned or operated by the Covnty, the City 9f '. Naples or the City of Everglades. He stated that the agreement also' requires the County to implement a testing program to respond to complaints and to provide DER with various monthly and annual reports. He stated that he initially intends to inspect the facilities monthly in ordcr to characterize any problems that may exist and plant effluent will be sampled, and surrounding ground and surface waters. He stated that he estimates the cost of the program will be $105,000 annually to meet the requirements of the agreement. Commissioner Voss stated that he worked hard to get this referen- dum passed and this agreement gives the County the ability to enforce Page 17 - - - - - - April 29, 1986 the Lhings that have not been enforced by the DER over a long period of time. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded Þy Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-71 authorizing the Chairman to enter into an agreement with the FDER delegating from them to Collier County, as administered by the Department of Environmental Science and Pollution C0ntrol of Collier County, the duties of inspecting package sewage treatment facilities be adopted. Commissioner Holland stated that he would like to see the County look at all plants. ~~r. Lorenz stated that the agreement is for packuç~ plants of ~ 500,000 gallons per day or less, which will help the County get started with thc smallcr plants and this is all that DER will allow at this time, adding that the agrecment will be reviewed annually. .&DO~ una P~';! 532 Page 18 !DDK 093 w.: 53.9 Apr il 29, 1986 Item f8 RESOLUTION 86-72 ~UTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR FUNDING OF T-HÄNGERS AT THE IMMOKALEE AIRPORT - ÄDOPTED Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the objective of this item is a request for state aid in the development of income pro- ducing improvements at the Immokale~ Airport. He stated that Mr. Steve Kozman, FDOT Planner, requested that the Board enter into a joint participation agreement in order that he reserve $50,000 of FOOT funds in his 1986-87 budget for the future construction of T-Hangers at the Immokalee Airport, adding that these T-Hangers ·,.¡ould be designed and constructed after the completion of the Master Plan Study and would be located and constructed in compliance with the Master Plan's recommendations. He stated that the County's $50,000 portion would be included in the Immokalee Airport 1986-87 budget and the expense would be recovered in future revenues and incre~sed airport ¡. use. He stated that the life of the T-Hangers is 20 years and it i~\ estimated that the rent would be $IOO to $200 per month for each T-Hanger and with 8 units, the County would recover its portion of investment within 4 to 6 years. He stated that he is recommending that the Board adopt the resolution. Tape #5 Commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-72 authorizing execution of a joint participation agreement with the State of Florida tor funding of T-Hangers at the Immokalee Airport be adopted. Page 19 - - - "..-----."..----Q"" .4>__ __._".__,_".___ '!OCK 093"n 559 Apr il 29, 1986 Item 19 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING ~GREEMENTS FOR CONTRACT SERVICES ON ÄN ANNUAL BASIS - AWARDED TO 6 DIFFERENT FIRMS Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that this item is to gain approval of staff's listing of professional land surveyors and to have the Chairman execute the annual service Agreements with various firms. He noted that the Transportation Department has an increasing need for professional land surveying services on an as-needed basis for planning, study, design and construction programs, adding that it is proposed that such services be secured under an open ended annual service contract with multiple surveying firms. He noted that the engagement of a particular firm to provide as-needed services will be determined by the Department for each Occurrence as evaluating pro- bable cause, expertise, capability, resources, and response time offered by the firm relative to the scope of work. He stated that the recommended multiple contract approach will be limited to smaIl '~.. projects where the basic construction costs are estimated to be less than $100,000 or the total amount of the fee is $5,000 or less, in order to be consistent with State Statutes and the opinion of the County Attorn0Y. He noted that the recommended list of engineerin:://sIJrveying firms are: Agnoji, Assaad, Barber & Brundage, Inc. E. R. Brownell & Associates, Inc. Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. Trigo, Evers & Associates, Inc. Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc. He stated that it is his recommendation that the Board approve the agreements for contract services on an annual basis with the various Page 20 - - - ...,,~-""'----~. April 29, 1986 above-mention~d firms. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the professional land surveying agreements for contract services on an annual basis be awarded to the various firms. " " &COK ŒJ3 P:',I 560 Page 21 . --~-~;""-.---,,,,,,-,,,,"-,,,,,.",,";.-,--,~" -'--- 093~~û47 ^pril 29, 1986 Item '10 BID 86-961 FOR SEWER RODDER , VACUUM TR !CR - AWÄRDED TO JET-VAC SANITARY SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $13~ 730.20 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 26, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavi. of Publication filed with thc Clerk, bids wcre received for a sewcr rodder and vacuum truck until 2:30 P.M., ^pril 9, 1986. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that bids were sent to four prospcctive bidders and three bids were received for a jet-vac sanitary truck for vacuuming and cleaning sewer lines and small package plants. He stated that this item was budgeted for last year with system development charges, but he has since been told that these system development charges should not be used for that purpose and he is asking for a $90,000 budget amendment into this account so that the bid can be awarded for $134,730.20 to Jet-Vac Sanitary Services. Commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss an~ i ~ carried unanimously, that B d 86-961 for a sewer rodder and vacuum truck be awarded to Jet-Vac sanitary Services in the amount of $134,730.20. Item ill SEWER MASTER PLAN REPORT - ACCEPTED. STAFF TO ~PPOINT A CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE AND SEND OUT RFP'S FOR DESIGNING OF PHASE I SEWER COLLECTION ÄND EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that on December 17, 1985, he presented to the Board facts surrounding the one plant alter- Page 22 .. .. .. - .. .. April 29, 1986 native for south Collier County regional facility. He stated that thcre arc 50 plus existing package plants ranging from l500 gallons per day to l50,OOO gallons per day, which does not include the Glades, Lely, and Foxfire plant in the area that is being planned. He stated that thcre was also a discussion on the large concentration of scptic tanks. He stated that Mr. Tom Taylor of Hole, Montes & Associates, asked thc Commi3sion to give direction to the one-plant alternative in order to finalize his master plan document. lie notcd that in the Vtilities Division this Master Plan is very important and constantly referred to for pipe sizes, pipe locations and developcrs look to it " for tneir planning of future developments. He noted that proposals have been taken for a rate study of all County water and sewer custo- ~ers, which will take into account the capital needs as well as the :operation and maintenance needs of the system. He stated that future capital projects will be reviewed with the Master Plan in mind so that main extensions will be constructed for thc propcr sizc to fit within the Master Plan proccss. He stated that Mr. Taylor will point out the regional sewer treatment plant site as being somewhat flexible, but that any change in the actual location of the plant must fit in with the overall Master Plan, as it will be used as a very esscntial tool for determining pipe sizes and locations and any changes that become necessary will be evaluated as to their effect on the rest of the net- work. He stated that Mr. Taylor will show phasing of collection systems, which are called arteries, to the system and will provide for &GC~ o!Jaw.! 648 Page 23 ßODK 093 ~".: fi4.9 April 29, 1986 future neighborhood collection systems to be connected to the arteries. He stated that since the approval of the acquisition of East Naples Water Systems, Inc., the Utility Staff has worked with the Engineers of Record in providing for a pipeline to divcrt Kings Lake sewage flow to thc East Naples Water System Sewer Plant, eliminating the nced for an immediate plant expansion of Foxfire Sewer Treatment Plant. He stated that the actual implementation of the project should be limited by development and cash flow within the Utilities Division. He stated that what is accomplished in the phasing of sewer collection systems to eliminate package plants will dovetail with the earlier presentation by Mr. Lorenz, adding that his efforts to abate pollu- tion can only be accomplished if the Utilities Division can accomplish phasing out some of the pac~age plants. He stated that he will work closely with Mr. Lorenz in the planning stages of the Master Plan. Mr. Tom Taylor of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. stated that he ~ has proceeded with the developing of the phasing program that they , . were directed to do, adding that he is appearing beforc the Board this. date to have the project finalized. He noted that he developed the program for a collection transmission system as well as an effluent distribution system. He stated that the collection transmission system has been broken into four phases, which is for the use in financial planning. He stated that Phase I is what he projects to be constructed over the next 3 years, 1987 through 1990. He stated that it is a fairly extensive system which would provide the capability of Page 24 - - - - - .. Ap ri 1 29, 1986 building the actual collection system in East Naples, to be tied to the main systcm, with a single treatment plant site which would havc a gcncrðl location of Rðttlesnake Hðmmock and Lely area. lie stated that the Utility Staff is trying to determine a faasible site, adding that generally anything in this area would have minimal impact to changcs in pipc sizing, which was based for a 40-year flow which is generally the useful life of a piping system. He stated that phasing .of this piping system will be done during an economic analysis of final design. He stated that the second priority of the first phase is ~i~king up Naples Industrial Park, the Glades area, and an area extending down thc Trail and Naples Manor area. He noted that the cost provided in the Master Plan document docs not provide a detailed cost for the construction of the various collection systems that would be needed in areas that do not have any now, particularly in East Naples and the Naples Manor area. He stated that the second phase of the program is extending up Davis Blvd. to the intersection of Radio Road, an extension to County Road 951 and a further extension down the Trail to State Road 95l, extending to the south on S.R. 95l, adding that the phases are somewhat flexible depending on the growth in Collier County. He stated that this is a planning too 1 for the Utilities Division and will be useful for Developers and Staff. He noted that the effluent distribution system was laid out in phases, also, with Phase I providing effluent to approximately 6 existing golf courses and Phase II extends to the Glades area golf courses. He . &DC~ ODa P~C.: 650 Page 25 1QM 093~? 651 ^pr il 29, 1986 stat~d that Phase III and IV extends out to S.R. 951 area and the East Trail. He stated that the County will probably not be able to build all of Phase I in the initial project due to financial constraints, but, hopefully, grant funding through the 201 process will come through to give the County assistance. He stated that the majority of package plants to be phased out is in Phase I, adding that a large conglomeration of them are on Radio Road and the East Naples area. He stated that there is a lot of work and construction in phasing out these small package plants. Mr. John Dyer of PRC/Consoer, Townsend, stated that as far as the treatment plant alternative is concerned, the recommendation stands as previously presented, an oxidation ditch type, single treatment plant with effluent filtration for spray disposal to the golf cour- ses. He stated that he is currently trying to identify some poten- tis] sites for the location of the plant, adding that he wants to. be sure that a site is obtained that has expansion capabilities for " future growth of the regional treatment plant. He stated that with the Board approval of the plan, the major step has been made. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the sewer master plan report be accepted and staff appoint a consultant selection committee and send out Requests for proposals for designing or the Phase I sewer collection and effluent distribution system. Item 112 STAFF TO PROCEED ON THE 201 FACILITIES PLAN AND PUBLIC MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 29, 1986, RE THE STATUS OF THE 201 FACILITIES PLAN Page 26 - - - ''''''_,_.....__UH'....·.'''''---.._ .. - - .. April 29, 1986 Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that he i3 requesting approval to procecd on thc 201 Facilities Plan and to hold a Special Board Meeting on said issue on May 29, 1986 at 9:00 A.M. He stated that the sewer master plan dovetails with the 201 Facilities Plan in a lot of ways but gets into thc environmental issues more. Mr. Tom Taylor of Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. stated that there will be four service areas in the County with the most southerly area being Marco Island. He stated that the County does not have control over Marco Island Utility or Deltona at this time, but he is required to evaluate the area if the County is going to ultimately acquire Marco Island Utilities. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Taylor stated that the 201 Facili ties Plan requires the evaluation of sludge disposal methods, adding that currently he foresees it going to the existing landfill 'or processed through the resource recovery plant, which will be eva- luated for cost effectivencss and environmental impact. He stated that there are alternatives which will be checked into. Commissioner Hasse stated that there will be a lot of sludge which will take up a lot of land and all alternatives should be investigated, noting that the County could get into the sod farming business. Mr. Taylor indicated that most of the area from Naples Bath & Tennis down through Poinciana along Airport Road, is served by the City by way of an interim agreement between the County and the City which will be part of a service area in the future. &OCK 093 I'y,t f~2 Page 27 093 PJ<;! 653 April 29, 1986 Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that through the 201 Facilities Plan process, there needs to be input from the public and the Commission as well. Mr. Dyer indicated that with reference to the sludge, all alter- natives will be looked at and a recommendation will be made, but a lot of interest will not exist until the treatment plants are on line. Commissioner Hasse asked if deep well injection has been thought of, to which Mr. Dyer indicated that this is very costly, adding that there are othcr alternatives for effluent disposal and spray irriga- tion is the best from an ~conomic standpoint. Commissioner Holland indicated that there is no deep well injec- tion in Collier County now and he would like to look at other alter- natives long and hard before considering deep well injection. commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and oarried unanimously, that Statf proceed on the 201 Facilities Plan . and the publio meeting be held on May 29, 1986, re the status of th.~ 201 Facilities Plan. Item U3 BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR PAYMENT,OF ADDITIONAL OUTSIDE ~TTORNEY FEES TO KÄRON, MORRISON AND SAVIKÄS IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,427.71 RE LITIG~TION WITH EAST NAPLES WATER SYSTEMS, INC. Commissioner Holland questioned if this amount of service was received from this firm, to which County Attorney Cuyler stated that to the best of his knowledge, the firm of Karon, f10rrison, & Savikas is an excellent firm and the County received services and represen- Page 28 - - - "..._'''',~...__.._-~-''''." , - - - April 29, 1986 tation for the fee submitted with regards to the litigation involving East Naples Water Systems, Inc. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the budget amendment to allow for payment of additional outside attorney fees to Xaron, Morrison' savikas in the amount of $18,427.71 re litigation with East Haple. Water sy.tem., Ina. be approved. Item U4 'SALES AGREEMENT WIn BELL HELICOPTER TDXTRON FOR PURCHASE OJ' A USED BELL L-1 HELICOPTER - APPROVED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS ~~ssistant County Manager Dorrill stated that this item is to exe- . cute á'sales agreement on a used Bell L-l helicopter, adding that on April 15, 1986, the Board authorized staff to sell the County's Huey Helicopter and bring back to the Board a purchase agre~ment on a used helicopter with a price of approximately $400,000. He stated that Bell had provided information on four used L-l's with prices ranging from $370,000 to $450,000, and the helicopter with the best component times within the price estimate was $410,000. He noted that the price was negotiated down to $398,000 and still includes the required extras like the high skid gear, the double ambulance litters, the cargo hook, the new interior and exterior paint, and the refurbished interior seats and carpet. He indicated that the final sale will be conditioned on the County selling the Huey, inspection, flight test, and pilot transition training which consists of two factory transition courses. ... 600K 093' N".! 654 Page 29 ~.."'" __"'C'''''''''~.~·.'_'_ ,.,,~ · ,'#..... .~~, ðD~< U93"r~ 655 Apr 11 29, 1986 cOllai..ion.r VO.. .OTed, .eoonded by Commi..ioner Ooodniqbt .nd carried 4/1, (commi.sion.r Holland opposed) that th. ..1.. .qr....nt with B.ll H.1ioopt.r Textron for the puroha.e of . u..d B.11 L-l llelicopt.r b. .pproved with th. atipu1ation that th. final aal. i. con~ition.4 on th. County selling the Huey, inspection, f1iqht t..t, an~ pilot tranaition training_ ..~ .-. " ; ¡ Page 30 - - - .-. ~.'; r. -' , L . , . . ~, . . , . i , . ¿'.~ toOK U D J ,.r,t 657 Apr 11 29, 1986 'I ¡Je U Item '15 DT~CUSSIOK RZGARDIMQ TZLZPHORZ SYSTZM - .0 ACTIO. TAKZ. Tom 011iff, Administrative Assistant to the County Manager, stated that this is simply an update on the current telephone system and some of the options that are available. He stated that the existing telephone system was purchased in the latter part of 1983 and currently only has capacity for 25 additional telephones. He stated that with an ugrade of a carrier, 64 additional telephones could be added. He stated that with the carrier the system would be at maximum with memory and could not be upgraded any further without a substantial increase in hardware and cost. He stated that he feels that there are only two options available, one is the addition on the existing phone system through AT&T, which would allow an additional 200 telephones at a cost of approximately $100,000, but these telepho- nes would not be compatible function-wise with the other telephones in . the system. He stated that to change this would mean an addition iÒ' software which would cost approximately $150,000, which would mean an additional $250,000 for an additional 200 telephones to make it match the enlire existing system. He stated that this is not a good option, but the only other option is to purchase or look at other available phone systems. He noted that the growth projection rates that were done in 1983 showed that the existing telephone system would be able to handle the County until the year 2000, adding that ''''.-' ........ ~ ¡ I Page 31 ¡ . ! _ .J ~ ""'114 í . . , . þ. , .. . . ..' ..) . - - " .. . ¡ j ¡ 1 I j \ April 29, 1986 the growth projections were wrong and within a year the existing system will have reached its maximum. He noted that the current phone systems that are available on the market today have a total number of 7,000 to 8,000 phones. He stated that the rough cost of a new phone system would be about $350,000. He stated that the County needs to be thinking about a new system, adding that the problem is that lead time and purchase usually requires about 10 months to get it in and have it up and running. He stated that if there is about a year on the current system, things need to be started now so that the 'county does not end up in a bind a year or a year and a half from now. He ~tated that Staff is thinking about going out for an RFP for a con- " sultant to come in and write a proposal for a new phone system, adding that each of these steps will be brought back to the ë~ard before ~nything is done. He stated that if the County went to a new system, ;the retail value on the old system is poor, adding that the return on ·the initial investment would only be about $.10 to $.12 on the dollar, which would mean about $30,000. Commissioner Voss stated that one of the problems was that the eXisting system is a digital system, adding that the County was about 6 months ahead of themselves in purchasing the system. Commissioner Holland questioned who did the study that indicated that the County was buying equipment that would last until the year 2000, to which Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that a telephone consultant that lived in Golden Gate produced the report and recommendation. i ~.J. ~'-. I II .. . aOOK 093 W.! 658 Page 32 · , , 'fÞ ... ¡ ¡ I j ! \ \ j 1 ,. 093 par.~ 659 Apr il 29, 1986 Mr. Olliff stated that there is no action required on this matter, adding that this is simply an update on the telephone system. It_ '16 PAIKBWEBBBR SBLBCTBD AS 8EKIOR UNDBRWRITER AT 60\ AND SMITH BARNEY 8BLBCTED A8 JUKIOR UNDBRWRITER AT 40\ POR THE BOND ISSUE RBPIKAXCIKG County Manager Lusk stated that the selection committee met on choosing underwriters for the refunding issues, adding that paineWebber was the lowest, but the selection committee has recommended Smith Barney be selected as the junior underwriter at 40\. He stated that this would be in the best interest of the County. Fiscal Officer Giles questioned if this would be at PaineWebber's price, to which County Manager Lusk replied affirmatively. County Manager Lusk stated that he has talked with Smith Barney on this matter and they have agreed. Mr. Dave Fischer of Fischer Johnson, Allen & Burke, Financial'. " " Advisors to the County, stated that this is a result of the recommen- dation of the committee, adding that with all the proposals that came in, it was founded that the savings with the three refundings would amount to approximately $2.77 million in present value, but future value would be around $5.77 million. He stated that when everything is completed, it will not be exactly that as markets will change, but this gives a good estimate on what can be accomplished. He stated that he recommends the split between the two because Smith Barney came in with a different process of savings than PaineWebber did, but it Page 33 , " - - .. j i I I ¡ j ,., .. .. - April 29, 1986 was the idea of the committee that by using the talents of both firms that the best refund mechanism would be obtained. Mr. ~eller stated that interest rates are constantly dropping and the rates are not going to go up faat, adding that if the County waits a while maybe more money could be saved. Fiscal Officer Giles stated that the problem the County faces with this is that there is another deadline of September 1, 1986, where the law changes and the County can no longer get the benefit of the 38-38, adding that the County could not advance refund any of the issues. He stated that if September 1, 1986, goes by, the County wou~~ have to continue paying the higher interest rates for approxima- tely the next 10 years before they could be retired because there is no early redemption feature on them. He stated that this is the last chance to advance refund. , . Mr. Fischer stated that two of these issues have never been refunded before, although the sales tax has. He stated that it has never been a cost of issuance problem because the cost of issuance has been gained back in the arbitrage earnings, as it was invested greater than the bond rate actually cost. He stated that under the new rules, it will cost because the issuance cost can no longer be recovered. He stated that he would not be ready to go to market for at least 30 to 60 days and the whole issue will be looked at then. He stated that it is difficult to guess interest rates. Commissioner Voss .oved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and oarri.ð unani.ously, that PaineWebber be selected as Senior .. aGDK· 093' W.[ 660 Page 34 " ¡ ! I ¡ I I , I \ ; , lOOK 0931'A<;t 661 April 29, 198' underwriter at 150' and smith Barney be selected as Junior Underwriter at 40' for the bond issue refinancing. It_ 117 IIOUT:tn BILLS - APnOVBD I'OR PAYMmfT Pursuant to Resolution 81-150 the following checks were issued through Friday, April 25, 1986, in payment of routine bills: CHECK DESCRIPTION CHECK NOS. 142230 - 142622 AMOUNT $1,838,821. 43 Vendors Ite. '11 BUDGBT AXBNDMENTS .6-240/2431 '6-246 AND "-24' - ADOPTZD co..issioner Voss moved, .econded by Commis.ioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendments .'-240/2431 "-24' and "-24' be adopted. U.. III I'AYXBlft 01' ESCROW AGZlfT'1I LJ;GAL nB8 '1'0 SUK UJot :r. '1'HB MOt11ft' 01'. f2 ,500 I AND PAYHB1fT 01' UGISTRAR I'BB '1'0 CHBMICAL BANI: IX THB MOUri ".. 01' '1,432.40 - APPROVED Fiscal Officer Giles stated that these two bills are related to the Resource Recovery project: one is for legal fees to Sun Bank for $2,500 as Escrow Agent, and Registrar fees to Chemical Bank for $1,432.40, adding that there is an explanation in the Executive Sum- mary as to what the financial advisors have done to secure the best terms. comaissioner Voss moved, .econded by Commis.ioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, tbat payment of Escrow Agent.s legal fee. to I" .age 35 ¿ '·l,.~ :;;''ê. ~" Ii;, t~, :~k ." "~ .. - - April 29, 1986 Sun Bank in the amount of $2,500 and paymer.t of Registrar Fee to Chemic~l Bank in the amount of $1,432.40 be approved. It_ 120 RECONSIDERATION or PETITION eRR-.6-1c - NO ~CTION T~KBK County Attorney Cuyler stated that the technical requirements were not met for reconsideration of this item, adding that he has been in touch with the parties to inform them that they would have to fi1. a new petition. He stated that they have indicated that they are going to do same, adding that there is no action required. 'It.. 121 OOKMISSIONZR HASSE TO ~TT~ ~CO MEETING JULY 12-15, 1986 " commissioner Goodnight .oved, seconded by commissioner VO.. and aarri.d unani.ously, that it b. approved that commi.sioner Ha... attend the ~co .eeting July 12-15, 19.6. ***** commissioner Voss moved, seconded by commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, the foll~winq items be approved and/or adopted under the Consent Agenda: ***** Itelll 122 RESOLUTION .6-73 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT HOUCHIN AND GEKB HOUCHIN POR MITIGATION IX-LIBU-Or CIVIL OR CRIMINAL ACTION POR mrPBRHI'1"1'ZD TUB RBXOVAL PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 75-21 See Pages t, 7(, - & f() It.. 123 APPRO~ O~ $4,473.42 CRAKGZ ORDER rOR THE NORTH NAPLES COMHtJRITY PARK See Pages (Pi/ - 6P6 ): Itelll 124 paq. 3' aOIlK (JD3 W.! 662 :~';"~':'¡ . , ,..,.,. ~ii .: . ';" _.,..,.,--..,-_...~-",,"'---""-""'" ~;:ic~;.:.: 'i."., ..' ~;: ·>~t·· ,". ,~ ,:J .~.,¥,: '~~, . j¡.;:' ;;~... 093 p"r.! 6ßa April 29, 19U UIJOn:IUIABLJI UTILITY RZLOCATION AORZZX]!:1ft WITH FLORIDA P01f'J:R , LIOHY COMPAXY RZLATIKO TO EXTZXSIOK OF GOLDEK OATE BOULEVARD (JCT. OAKS BLVD. TO JCT. C.R. 951) See Pðges t:. R7 - 70 '7 It.. 125 KASTER PLAK STUDY AGRZEKBKT WITH DELTA AND ASSOCIATES FOR THZ tMXOxaLBB AIRPORT See Pðges ?ðY- ?dl7 It.. 12' 8ZTTLBKBKT 8TIPULATIOK OK COSTS AND ATTORKBY FBIIS FOR COLLIER CO~ VS. OMARA (CRAPARA, PARCEL 115) CASE NO. 81-1770-CA-01-TB It_ '27 LIST fØ PROFBSSIODL LAlfD StJRVBYORS AND SELECTION OF A FIRM '1'0 PIIRJ'OJUC DBSIG1f SURVEY ULATIKG TO DAVIS BLVD. IMPROVIIMBJfTS (JCT. SAN'l'A BARBARA BLVD. '1'0 JCT. COUNTY BARN ROAD) (TRIGO, EVERS) See Pðges 7 ~ t - 7 t.f If It.. '28 COJfTIt&C'1' WITH 80tr'l'BEABTBlUf LIBRARY NBTWORK, IRC. AND TH. COLLIER . .~IO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS AND SERVICES '. See pages?~ 77f Item '2' CBAI~ AUTHORIZED TO SIOK CERTIFICATB OF CORRECTION TO TBB TAX ROLL AS PUSBJfTBD BY TBB PROPERTY APPRAISBR'S OJ'J'ICB 1984 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY No. 1984-153 Dðted 4-17-86 1985 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY Nos. 1985-169/171 Dated 4-15/17-86 U.. 130 ~, it' Pa9. 37 ,.. _,. ....'....'..',.,. ·1 "'1';', 4'·: -. "' .. .. .. _"_"",,,-_,,___J ~-'-""--"-'''-'---'--'''' .-... ·"'" April 29, 198' X%8CBLLAXBOOS CORRBSPOKDZNCB - ~ILZD AND/OR RlFZRRZD There being no objection, the fOllowing correspondence was filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below: L Copy of prelist Survey of Special Districts, 1987 Census of Governments, prepared by Fiscal Officer James C. Giles. Filed. 3. Letter dated 04/14/86 from Tom L. Lewis, Jr., AlA, Dept. of Community Affairs, advising of workshops for potential applicants for the Federal Fiscal Year 1985 SmaIl Cities CDBG. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins and filed. Letter dated 04/l4/86 from Susan M. Cook, Planning Manager, Community Services Section, DCA, advising that the County's 1986 Community Services Block Grant local government share funding cycle has been approved (Collier County Health Unit Indigent Dental Program). XC Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins, Jim Giles, Roger Evans and filed. 2. , " . 4. Letter received 04/17/86 from Douglas L. Fry, Environmental Supervisor, DER, enclosing short form application (File No. 111185965, lll188465) which involves dredge and fill acti- vities. Referred to Vickie Mullins, Dr. Proffitt, Tom Kuck and filed. s. Letter received 04/18/86 from Douglas L. Fry, Environmental Supervisor, DER, enclosing short form application (File No. 111189255) which involves dredge and fill activities. Referred to Vickie Mullins, Dr. Proffitt, and filed. 6. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking received 04/17/86 from DNR, Division of Beaches and Shores, Rule Number l6B-24. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins, Dr. Proffitt and filed. 7. Letter dated 04/18/86 from James A. Naff, Jr., Chief, Bureau of Federal Surplus Property, Dept. of General Services, acknowledging receipt of Collier County's application to maintain eligibility in the Federal Surplus Property Utili- zation Program. Referred to Don Lusk, Tom Olliff and filed. 8. Minutes of CCPe 3/20/86 and agenda for 04/17/86; City of Naples 04/02/86, Parks & Recreation 03/20/86 and agenda for 04/17/86. Filed. 9. Letter dated 04/11/86 from David R. Schlenbecker, Sr. Vice President, Mr. Build, advising that contractor William G. aOOK 093 P~~E 664 Page 38 ~ ." ........-.,"""-"'... ._-~...,._,. ~~......,<".""_...~,...."-',..,..",..',.".,','"'_,'",,',,.~,""'''''''"-''4,"'«'''''~~'''''''"'_'''''__''''~''~''"'''''''''' ~U" ~." ~t~ ~;,.. ~¡ " .. (LQ3",o!OO5 April 29, 1986 Brown, Sandar Const., tH 8RCC was terminated from the Hr. Build Franchise System in mid 1985, and he continues to represent himself as a Franchisee. Referred to Guy Carlton, Joe Magri, Joy Munsey and filed. lO. Notice to Owner dated 04/l6/86 from Richard Byrd, stating that he is furnishing mining fill material for dump site under an order given by Mr. Kermit Bunn (Bunn Trucking). Referred to Neil Dorrfill, Tom Kuck, Bob Fahey, Ken Cuyler and filed. ..... Reoe..: 12:30 P.M. - Reoonvened: 2:30 P.M. with Deputy Clerk Kenyon beinq replaoed by Deputy Clerk Ruis ..... 'lap. '7 It.. 131 J'IRHB InBRVIBWBD RB BOCK RB:NOUR.ISJDœ1f'1' PROGRAK - COASTAL BlIGInBRINQ COllStJLTAIf'l'S INC. SBLBCTBD Public Works Administrator Kuck stated two consultants, Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. and Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., will be interviewed in connection with the Beach Renourishment Program, and out of professional courtesy, they will appear in alpha- betical order; one firm will wait outside of the Boardroom while the other is dOing their presentation. COASTAL BHaInBRIKa CO:NSULTANTS, IHC. Hr. Chris Dane, co-founder of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. spoke first on behalf of his company. He gave a brief history of ~ "-, Coastal Engineering, its diversity, and key members who will be involved in this project, adding that their specialty is coastal engi- neering. He stated that his personal contribution to this program will be in the area of construction feasibility, cost estimating, eva- luation of structural alternatives and master planning. He said that ,. V· Page 39 .. - .. .. '! ., - .. .. , ~. '~:", April 29, 1986 Mr. Mike Stevens, who is c marine scientist trained in marine and coastal geology, will present some of the loca1 project experience which is relevant to this program and also highlight some of their direct beach nourishment experience, adding that Mr. Stevens will be primarily responsible for determining the sediment budget, identifying critical erosion areas and trends, historical analysis and interpreta- tion of other technical data. Mr. Mike Stevens gave a slide presentation saying initially that ~o evaluate and appraise the need and feasibility for any beach nourishment project in Collier County, numerous design elements must "- be considered; wave forces, sediment transport, sediment supply and stability of sand to be put on the beach and beach slope charac- teristics. While showing the slides, he narrated the projects his firm has been involved in and the goals and work accomplished in each; Long Boat Key, Manasota Key, Captiva Island, Wiggins Pass, Gordon Pass and Kewaydin Island. He stated that their work program in Collier County will be to supplement the existing data base in the Department of Natural Resources in the County and update their existing data base of beach profiles. Mr. Dane handed to each Commissioner a written summary of the firm's professional staff followed by a phasing of the work elements and the outline of a report that they would prepare as a product of ·the study. He summarized by saying that his staff is the best qualified in the State of Florida to do this study, to prepare a ~DDK 0931'1~~ 666 Page 40 ,. "".f· '\,;. ~';,.' ~, ; ~; 'llfF. ·1\ .. 093I'1r~ 667 Apr il 29, 1986 Comprehensive Beach Management Plan for Collier County. He added that the firm has in Naples the in-hou8e personnel and equipment needed to do this work in addition to their data base. He said that the firm is involved in this community, has the local experience, is familiar with the history of Collier beaches and with the goals of the County and its staff, and this will enhance their ability to create a plan that can be accepted in the commur¡ity and can be implemented. He stated that their goal would be to develop a plan that will serve as a long- range planning tool and blueprint for the enhancement and future pro- tection of the Collier County beaches. Commissioner Pistor stated that Mr. Mike Stevens and he had spoken about preventive measures that could be taken so that the County does not have to continually spend a lot of money for beach nourish- ment. He asked Mr. Dane if his study includes a possible way of pre- venting further extensive erosion, and Mr. Dane said "Yes" that the outline which he just gave to the Commissioners includes that. '.~ " Commissioner Pistor asked Mr. Dane how much this study would cost the County, and Mr. Dane stated that they told the Selection Committee . that the County should budget between $50,000-$100,000 for the entire study which involves a significant amount of work. Commissioner Hasse asked if this work would overlap with the City of Naples who has hired a consulting firm, and Mr. Dane answered negati- vely, adding that the City has hired a small firm concerning Cordon Pass. Commissioner Pistor indicated that the City of Naples has expressed a desire to be included in the County's study. Page 41 -n Ã-~ :.yj¥ -.. . ~.¡':'. ~~;\: . :,: ,~- ... - - - ___""_"",."""""""""""".,."""""","_.,;~...,~,~.,,..~,,,..w..>......,,·,,._,,",,~.'4' - - - April 29, 1986 Commissioner Voss asked if the City of Naples was going to pay for part of the study, and Commissioner pjstor said there are two alter- natives; 1) have a County-wide referendum and charge everyone taxes, 2) negotiate with the City for a faIr share. Commissioner Pistor thanked both gentlemen for their presentation. COASTAL PLARXING , BNGIKEZRING, INC. Mr. Tom Campbell, President of Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc., spoke on behalf of his company whose offices are located in Boca Raton, Florida. Mr. Campbell proceeded to outline the firm's work on " the East and West coast of Florida as well as in northeastern United sta~s. He added that the firm has done both State and Federal planning for \. beach restoration projects. He continued by saying that beaches and inlets interact as to be dependent on each other, and in Collier County there are reasons to be very attuned to what happens relative to inlets and beaches: most inlets are stealing most of the sand; 2) there is no off-shore supply sand other than the inlet shoals, adding that the inlets are both the cause of the problem and also a source of material for the beaches. He indicated that one of the major elements of a program in Collier County will be to use off-shore sand from shoals and that part of any "ap. '8 maintenance plan would be to identify how much sand is available on the off-shore bar system. He stated that in Naples and Marco Island ·they would be looking at a full-scale beach restoration program to restore those areas of beach that are washed out in front of struc- toOl( 093 "...r 668 .. Page 42 4· ,,~; . ï':- ,.r l:'l .; l\i' ~~'..". :~{: -_-_....._IIfiI·__M,._'.'"""""".'_".'M,'__~·,,;_."'__U·.,.........._,.,......"""""_""~__"...,.>~..." " . . , . , -.. , , ~ ,. , , . . ,~ f!,1. .~. it '-)^' -r, (: IOOJ 093 P~~.¡ 669 April 29, 1986 tures, and that any beach maintenance program would take into account keeping development away from the natural areas. Mr. Campbell introduced Mr. Rob Patton who is the firm's West Coast representative. Mr. Patton stated that the approach that Dr. Benedict started and Dr. Proffitt is continuing and the information that has been gathered is considerable and Coastal Planning will work with the staff in trying to develop a program for recommendation for Collier County that would give the decision makers some scientific and technical expertise. Mr. Campbell summarized by saying that Coastal Planning has exten- sive experience in beach restoration, and dredging is the best alter- native when faced with structures that are close to the ocean and a lack of the beach protective system. He added that if it is done in concert with inlet by-passing systems doing reconstruction, it can be both cost effective and an effective plan for putting the beaches back '. in shape and providing a long-term benefit to the residents of Colller County. Commissioner Voss asked why does inlet robs the beach of sand and Mr. Campbell answered that many inlets develop an off-shore bar ~ system, and when this bar system grows it acts to block wave action which does not approach or attack the beach. Commissioner Voss asked if the sand moves from north to south do the northern beaches eventually end up with no sand, and Mr. Campbell answered affirmatively. .' ...;' Page 43 Îf.~ . 1/.' ,. ~ - · . '. " > .. '. Á . ., '.,. " - .. .. , April 29, 1986 Commissioner Pistor asked whether the firm had done any work on putting structures out in the water that will deter the erosion of the beaches, and Mr. Campbell answered "Yes," and cited Captiva Island where it was a more viable method, but that Coastal Planning usually recommends beach restoration. Commissioner Pistor asked what a study of the Collier beaches, from Marco to Barefoot Beach, would cost, and Mr. Campbell answered that it would depend on the scope. He added that at this point the key elements relative to how much off-shore surveying would be done, have,not been discussed. He said that based on the field data and ~. existing information they can define a study based on the County's budget and give the County something that is workable, and possibly define additional studies that will take the program to the next step. Commissioner Pistor stated that the study would involve 40 miles of beach including the City, and the County needs a rough idea of what it will cost so the amount can be budgeted. He added that he has received quite a few programs from people in Michigan and other places, and many talked about building some kind of structure out in the water and the one in Michigan has been very effective in restoring the beach in that manner. Mr. Campbell said that the problem is that any program they define which is so large in scope, they will be con- sidering the use of State and Federal funds to implement these pro- jects. He added that structural stabilizers are difficult to make part of an overall program and stilI expect to get a bottom line or end product that is effective and usable within the County. 1GOK 093;J~.'6ïU Page 44 " . ' , " . J ' . , . ',;/''' , .:r ~, I: [-~"..."" - ~ 'f"'-_' .. 093n?671 April 29, 1986 Commissioner Pistor asked if the sand that may be found off the beaches is satisfactory for putting back on the beaches, and Mr. Campbell answered that the Corps of Engineers did a survey and found that there is no source of off-shore sand other than inlet shoals where sand has built up and that sand will be of good quality. He added that there could be a limited supply, and the alternative would be to go to inland sources which would be expensive, but that one of the most important elements of developing an erosion control plan is not allowing the inlet transfer project to waste that resource. Commissioner Hasse asked if there is a way of identifying the quality of that sand, and Mr. Campbell answered that there are fiber cores to take samples and probes that go down to the material that underlies the good quality sand, and that is a good part of a main- r tenance or management program, to identify what resources there are available and how much c~n be tapped. Commissioner Hasse asked if, after the sand is in place, is it~ planted and Mr. Campbell said that the back beach is planted to establish a dune line that will help in storms. Commissioner Holland asked for a ball park figure on the cost and ". Mr. Campbell replied that using existing data, along with Coastal Planning's experience, it would be around $30,000 to put together a program: in other words, using DER profiles, Dr. Proffitt's erosion rates, but with no field measurements, which would the be next phase. Commissioner Pistor questioned if that figure was for the whole beach, Page 45 - - - - .. - . April 29, 1986 and Mr. Campbell said "Yes." Commissioner Hasse asked if Coastal Planning was taking into consideration that there is a lot of studying being done for the entire length of the City of Naples. Mr. Campbell said that he reviewed the study which was done by Suboceanic. Commissioner Pistor thanked Mr. Campbell for his presentation. *** Commissioner Voss stated that Coastal Planning's emphasis is on rebuilding a beach which is correcting the symptom, but not putting much emphasis on structures that might correct the problem and elimi- nate future rebuilding of the beach. Dr. Proffitt answered that both "- firms.are talking about the same thing, but Mr. Campbell a little less, and in talking to Dr. Dean, head of DNR, he had stated that in Captiva it had been known to have a significant positive effect. Dr. Mark Benedict stated that the basic philosophy today is to get away from building such structures as seawalls, jetties, etc., because of their negative impact, noting that the trend has been towards renourishment. He added that neither firm would look at the renourishment and not look at the structure as a supplementary mecha- nism. Dr. Proffit stated that as far as State and Federal permitting, it is easier to fund that kind of project rather one with the struc- tures. Commissioner Holland stated if the sand is not available, the next ·best thing would be to put some kind of structure to hold what comes in, and Dr. Benedict said that there is sand available in the shoals, aliDK 093" PA'.! 672 Page 46 ;:;¡~ ~;':1 - . ~ " It#<··· - _ ---_i~-:- .~':.. '~,!,;," . . '.) \1,.; .;\ ~. .. 093 pa~.! 673 April 29, 1986 for example off Big Marco and Caxambas shoals. Commissioner Holland questioned if what Coastal Planning recocmended was doing spot renourishment, and Dr. Benedict replied affirmatively, Commissioner Hasse stated that there is a considerable difference in the figures that both firms quoted. Dr. Benedict said that if there is data available ahead of time, pointing out certain areas of concern, then data sampling can be concentrated and a more economi- cally feasible project can be formulated. Dr. Benedict added that sand source analysis is extremely expensive, adding that the dif- ference in price has to do with the RFP not b.Üng specific on the actual scope and that is going to make a difference between $100,000 and $30,000. Mr. Kuck stated that when they sit down with the number one firm, a "shopping list" of different items will be available identifying 8 price for each item. !rap. t9 ')0 Commissioner Hasse asked how the Board is to evaluate these kinds , of proposals if they do not know exactly who is doing what? Dr. Benedict said that the first step is to evaluate the qualifications, then a contract with all the specifics. Commissioner Voss asked if DNR has done profiles every 7300 feet can that be verified to see if that has changed or not so that the County can decide what to do, and Dr. Benedict answered that that is one of the first logical things to do, to look at the profiles that Page 47 .. - - '\ .. .. .. April 29, 1986 were done in 1973. But, he added, care must be taken in fine-tuning the project specs, and the first phase would be a pulling together of everything that is available, and a second phase that would address potential problems. Commissioner Hasse stated that both firms have g~,backgrounds. . ~. Brangaccio said that price cannot be used to evaluate, and the important thing~ls the Board's reaction to each firm and their prop,osals. Commi8sioner Holland asked if, in reality, there was little dif- ference in what each of the firms offered a8 far as price was con- cer~ed when they were interviewed individually, and Dr. Proffitt ~. an8wered that that was correct. Commissioner Voss stated that either firm is going to charge about the same once the scope i8 defined; so, ft is not a question of price, it is a question of which one will do the best jOb. Ms. Brangaccio stated that either firm can do the jOb required. Wri~ten ballots were read by Pi.cal Officer ailes wi~h ~he resul~. b.ing a Commi..ioner Holland Commi..ioner H.... Commi..ioner Vo.. Commi..ioner QoodDight Commi..ioner pi.tor Coastal Engineering Consul~ant.,Ino. Coast.l Engineering Con8Ul~an~.,Ino. Coastal Engineering Consultant.,Ino. Coastal Engineering Con.ult.nts,Ino. Coastal Engineering Consult.n~s,Ino. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commi.sioner Hasse and oarried unanimously, that staff be directed to negotiate with Coastal Bnqineerinq Consul~ants, Inc. on ~he B.ach a.nourishment study. .; BOOK 093" PAf,f 674: Page 48 i;;, ~~~ ~. W·· '~i: ~'. 1¡0." 'DOlt 093 ,.r.! 675 April 29, 1986 Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that an Advisory and Steering Committee had been recommended to sit in on the negotiations with the Consultants. He asked if the Board wanted that Committee to sit in afterwards, and Commissioner Voss said the Committee should be pres~nt to determine the scope and Commissioner Pistor concurred. Mr. Kuck stated the Board'. approval will be needed for the Advisory Committee and that Committee will formulate the scope and the Selection Committee will negotiate the contract. ... There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 3:45 P.M. by Order of the Chair. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ..~ .:. a. fJµ-lif CHAIRMAN ~. " ~ ATT ,.;':~.fjAR~i/;. W!tIb . rJµJ\QAN, CLERK ~·;"·l· . ...i,... -.,.( ~ ~t'-'.. .('..".. ':-:Ì'.'~."~'~ ~ . .#7 :.. . '., . -.1 ~~fh~~ë min~~8 approved by the Board on ~~2Z1~s presented ~ or a./c~~~~~èa . . . ;", :,' '., Page 49 .. .. .. ~'~"""'''---''''--'-'''''>~''"~'-''-''''''.''''''''''''''''-''''''--'''''''--'-''.......,_.,....~_.."......