Agenda 01/22/2013 Item #11A 1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
n
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to accept the Atkins North America peer review of the Coastal Planning and
Engineering volume design for the 2013/14 beach renourishment project and approve the proposed
project bid form and bidding approach.
OBJECTIVE: Approve the peer review of the design volumes for the 2013/14 beach
renourishment project along with the bid form and bidding approach used on this project.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Peer review of the Coastal Planning and Engineering(CPE)design beach volumes.
Atkins North America conducted a peer review of the design beach volumes for the
2013/14 beach renourishment project (Attachment 1). Atkins evaluated CPE's design,
design calculations, modeling results, and construction standards for the beach fill
templates of the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches and compared the current
proposed design to the project constructed in 2006.
Based on their review,Atkins reached the following conclusions:
• The 419,120 cubic yards (CY's) beach design proposed by CPE was
independently verified by Atkins methods yielding a volume of 387,395 CY's.
The difference predominantly exists in the end section tapers of each
renourishment segment. End section tapers typically experience increased erosion
and sand spreading. The difference in volumes is within 10% of the total project
volume and attributed to the engineering judgment of the design professional.
• The quantity of sand required to restore the six year design template per the
original 2006 design is 408,005 CY's. The 2006 project design included no
project gaps and a different taper and volume design than the 2013 project.
• The methodology used by CPE to determine the design life of the 2013/14 project
(design matrix, advanced renourishment, and special adjustments) was the same
method used in 2006,and that project achieved its design life.
• The design approach utilized by CPE is consistent with the design approach
commonly used by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) where the
"advanced renourishment" is intended to address erosion rates throughout the
proposed design life of the project.
• The design approach is fundamentally sound and appropriate based on the review
of the data, documents, design drawings and reports as prepared and provided by
CPE.
• The beach fill template is appropriate to meet the design criteria based on Atkins'
assessment of the design and experience monitoring the project areas since 2006.
• Comparative profiles between the 2006 project and the proposed 2013/14 design
are included in the report. A comparative volumetric summary that compares the
sand volumes placed at each profile for each segment is also included in the
backup material.
/'■,
Packet Page-407-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
2. Bid Form and Bidding Approach
• At the 12/11/2012 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) directed
staff to bid this project in 50,000 CY increments beginning at 200,000 CY's and
ending at 500,000 CY's. This was requested due to concerns regarding the
methods and accuracy used to determine the design volumes. Atkins peer review
verified the completeness and accuracy of the design volumes.
• -Based on this verification, staff is suggesting an alternate bid form that is more in
line with industry standards. The intent is to simplify an already complicated bid
form and eliminate confusion. This is intended to lead to lower pricing and
preserve the volume and price flexibility that the commission directed. It will
also allow a downward adjustment if funding is unavailable or an upward
adjustment if an entity such a Pelican Bay wishes to add additional sand volume.
A proposed bid form is listed as Attachment 2 to this Executive Summary.
• As indicated in previous Board discussion, staff believes and the industry has
confirmed that significant cost savings can occur if fixed renourishment costs can
. • be shared with other municipalities that are conducting renourishment with
complementary schedules. The City of Longboat Key and the Captiva Erosion
Control District are conducting renourishments that appear to complement Collier
County schedule. Both these municipalities have expressed interest in working
with Collier County to develop an approach to benefit from fixed cost savings
without compromising Collier's schedule or our direct contracting approach. If
• directed, staff will explore these opportunities and bring recommendations back to
the Board.
FISCAL IMPACT: Regardless of the final design volumes or bid format, this project will be
scope managed to meet the available project funds in Tourist Development Council Fund 195 to
complete this work. As indicated on the bid form, Collier County can change the volume by
reach+/-25 %with no change in unit costs. The total volume range is 300,000 CY's to 500,000
CY's with a bid volume of 400,000 CY's.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: No impact to the growth management plan would
result from this Board action.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
requires simple majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action.—CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the Atkins North America peer review of
the Coastal Planning and Engineering volume design for the 2013/14 beach renourishment
project and approve the proposed project bid form and bidding approach.
Prepared by: Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management
Attachments: 1)Collier County Peer Review of Beach renourishment Projects,January 2013
2)Proposed bid form for the 2013/14 beach renourishment
Packet Page-408-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 11.A.
Item Summary: Recommendation to accept the Atkins North America peer review of the
Coastal Planning and Engineering volume design for the 2013/14 beach renourishment project
and approve the proposed project bid form and bidding approach. (Gary McAlpin, Coastal
Zone)
Meeting Date: 1/22/2013
Prepared By
Name: HambrightGail
Title: Accountant,Coastal Zone Management
1/15/2013 9:23:49 AM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, GMD P&R
Date: 1/15/2013 10:57:58 AM
Name: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director-CDES Engineering Services,Comprehensive
Date: 1/15/2013 12:18:44 PM
Name: McAlpinGary
Title: Director-Coastal Management Programs,Coastal Zon
Date: 1/15/2013 4:44:33 PM
Name: WardKelsey
Title: Manager-Contracts Administration,Purchasing&Ge
Date: 1/15/2013 5:07:04 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date: 1/15/2013 5:11:14 PM
Name: GreeneColleen
Title:Assistant County Attorney,County Attorney
Packet Page-409-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Date: 1/15/2013 5:24:32 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 1/15/2013 5:30:32 PM
Name: FinnEd
Title: Senior Budget Analyst,OMB
Date: 1/15/2013 5:35:53 PM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 1/15/2013 5:44:31 PM
Packet Page-410-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
PEER REVIEW OF BEACH RENOURISHMENT DESIGN
Prepared For:
Collier County—Coastal Zone Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples,Florida 34104
• -
u' sue` six�+ n '{a } =y °.
litt4 44A tarx' � rs r�
"te' P•!'�a,t *�n�
Xf�
Prepared By:
Atkins
4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard,Suite 700
Tampa,FL
January 2013
ATKINS
Packet Page-411-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
PEER REVIEW OF BEACH RENOURISHMENT DESIGN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Atkins was tasked by Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department with the peer
review of the County's 2013 beach renourishment design developed by Coastal Planning &
Engineering, Inc. (CPE). The review focuses upon the formulation of the currently proposed
beach renourishment design project (2013 project) and its comparison to the project constructed
in 2006 (2006 project). Atkins evaluates CPE's design, design calculations, modeling results, and
construction standards for the beach fill templates at Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples Beaches.
Per the County's scope of work to Atkins the following deliverables are:
1) Based upon our review of the design matrix, design drawings and reports as prepared and
• provided by CPE, the total quantity of sand to be placed on the beach in 2013 per CPE's
approach is 419,120cy. This volume was independently verified by Atkins' methods
which yielded a volume of 387,395cy (within 10% of the volume by CPE). The taper
volumes, areas at the end of the nourishment template segments, are predominantly
where the variance exists between the CPE and Atkins volumes.
2) The comparative profiles in Appendix A show the computed quantity of sand per linear
foot required to rebuild the 2006 beach fill template and the amount proposed for the
2013 beach fill template. As reflected in Table 5 a total of 408,005cy would be required
to rebuild the 2006 beach template as compared to the 419,120cy as calculated by CPE
for the 2013 beach fill template.
3) The Comparative Volumetric Summary Table in Appendix B indentifies the amount of
sand to be placed at each profile for each segment of the project (Vanderbilt, Park Shore
&Naples).
4) The assumptions are listed in CPE's Design Matrix under Special Adjustments and
include taper sections, minimum fill densities, and additional volumes needed based upon
modeling. The methodology used by CPE to determine the design life of the 2013 project
(design matrix, advanced nourishment, and special adjustments) was the same method
used in 2006, and that project achieved its design life.
5) Figures 3 & 4 in the report are examples of the profile comparisons in Appendix A
detailing variations in the 2006 and 2013 beach fill template design.
The CPE Design Matrix is an engineering analysis that consists of calculations to determine total
beach fill volume based on the minimum beach width, erosion rates, advanced placement of fill
material, special adjustments and the 6 year project design life.
ATKINS
Packet Page-412-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Atkins calculated volumes for the 2013 project using the "average end area" methodology
utilizing (a) XYZ coordinates provided by CPE; and (b) effective distances identified in the
Design Matrix. Atkins modified the effective distances for the tapers in CPE's Design Matrix
based on the design drawings. The differences between the design drawing volumes as calculated
by Atkins and the CPE Design Matrix volumes are:
• Atkins' volume calculation is 387,395cy and
• CPE's Design Matrix volume calculation is 419,120cy.
The 2013 project volumes calculated by Atkins are 31,725cy less than the Design Matrix volume
(see Table 3 and Appendix B). To further verify volume calculations, Atkins used (a) a separate
"average end area" volume calculation and (b) a "surface to surface" comparison in AutoCAD
Civil3D. Both methods supported the volume as calculated by Atkins. The difference in volumes
is within 10% of the total volume of the project and due to engineering judgement exercised by
CPE to increase the volumes in the taper sections.
The proposed 2013 beach nourishment project has less total volume than the 2006 project
(667,000cy), because the total project length was reduced from 44,378 ft. (8.4 mi.) to 24,616 ft.
(4.7 mi.) based on need and past project performance. The total project length has been reduced
and consequently less volume is being placed. The 2013 project does have a slightly higher fill
density (15.7 cy/ft in 2013 to 15.0 cy/ft in 2006) meaning slightly more volume will be placed
per linear foot of beach. This is due to subtle differences in the project areal extent and profile
geometry. R-44, and R-58A through T-62 required fill beyond the 2006 template in order to
address hotspots that were identified through yearly monitoring. The additional fill required
based on the design matrix at R-59 increases the potential for impact to nearshore hardbottom
per the equilibrium toe of fill analysis, but based on our review of the 2006 project performance
this area is not expected to cause impact.
The design criteria necessitates (a) a minimum design beach for a period of six (6) years and (b)
no impact to nearshore hardbottom. The design approach utilized by CPE is a) consistent with
the design approach commonly used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) where the
"advanced nourishment" is intended to address erosion rates throughout the proposed design life
of a project; and, b) fundamentally sound and appropriate based upon our review of the data,
documents, design drawings, and reports as prepared and provided by CPE.
The 2013 beach fill template proposed by CPE is appropriate to meet these criteria based upon
Atkins' assessment of the design and our experience monitoring the project areas since 2006.
ATKINS
Packet Page-413-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
PEER REVIEW OF BEACH NOURISHMENT DESIGN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. ENGINEERING DESIGN REVIEW 4
a. FILL VOLUMES 4
i. Design Matrix 4
ii. Design Drawings 5
b. MODELING RESULTS 7
c. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 8
d. EVALUATION OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE 8
i. Design Life 8
ii. Avoidance of Hardbottom 8
III. PROJECT COMPARISONS—2013 vs. 2006 12
a. 2013 PROJECT 12
b. 2006 PROJECT 13
c. COMPARISON SUMMARY 14
IV. DESIGN APPROACH EVALUATION 17
V. REFERENCES 19
ATKINS
Packet Page-414-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.Vanderbilt,Pelican Bay,Park Shore,and Naples Beach Location Map 3
Figure 2.Example of Equilibrium Profile at R-59 derived from CPE drawing 10
Figure 3. Comparative Profile at T-62 15
Figure 4. Comparative Profile at R-28 16
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.Summary of 2013 Project Design,CPE Volume Summary 2
Table 2.2013 Project Design,Atkins Volume Summary 2
Table 3. Comparison Summary of Design Matrix Volumes and Design Drawing Volumes 7
Table 4. Comparison of 2013 Project Design Matrix and Design Drawing Volumes 13
Table 5.Summary of 2006 Project Volumes 13
•
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A- Plan View and Comparative Profiles
Appendix B —Comparative Volumetric Summary Table
ATKINS
Packet Page -415-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
PEER REVIEW OF BEACH RENOURISHMENT DESIGN
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide an independent engineering review of the beach
renourishment design as currently proposed for the following areas, as shown in Figure 1:
• Vanderbilt
• Park Shore; and
• Naples Beach
The review (a) focuses upon the formulation of the currently proposed beach renourishment
design (2013 project) and its comparison to the project constructed in 2006 (2006 project) and
(b) evaluates the design drawings, calculations, modeling results, and construction standards as •
identified/provided by Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. (CPE).
The following documents/files/reports were used for this peer review analysis:
• "Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering
and Design Summary", November 2012 - prepared by CPE
• "Collier County Conceptual Renourishment Project Analysis", October 2011 — prepared
by CPE
• "Collier County Beach Renourishment Project Three Year Post-Construction Monitoring
Report", September 2009—prepared by CPE
• "Collier County Beach Renourishment Project" Permit Sketches, November 11, 2012
(Adobe pdf and AutoCAD file formats)—prepared by CPE
• 2006 project and 2013 project design template coordinates XYZ format — provided by
CPE
The 2013 design is intended to maintain a specific minimum design beach width for a period of
six (6) years while maintaining "no impact to nearshore hardbottom". The minimum design
beach widths are identified by CPE (2012) as the following distances measured from "a
landward baseline at the existing seawalls or edge of vegetation" to the Mean High Water Line
(MHWL, +0.33ft NAVD88):
• Vanderbilt: 100 feet
• Park Shore: 85 feet
1
Packet Page-416-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
• Naples Beach: 100 feet
The minimum design beach width criteria establish the landward-most location to which the
MHWL may erode. For clarity, the phrase `advanced nourishment' will be used throughout this
report when referring to fill placed seaward of the minimum design beach width. The advanced
nourishment method, was developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and is the
industry standard design approach for determining beach fill placement volumes.
Table 1 shows the volume calculations conducted by CPE, the 2013 project design proposes: (a)
59,724 cy for Vanderbilt, (b) Ocy (No Fill) for Pelican Bay, (c) 118,247 cy for Park Shore, and
(d) 241,149 cy for Naples Beach.
Table 1. Summary of 2013 Project Design, CPE Volume Summary
Length
Reach R-Monuments CPE Volumes
(FT) (MILES) (CY/FT) (CY)
Vanderbilt R-25+500 to R-30+500 5,082 1.0 11.75 59,724
Pelican Bay - 0 0.0 0.00 0
R-43+600 to R47+500
Park Shore T-50 to R-54+400 8,914 1.7 13.27 118,247
R58A-400 to R-64+500
Naples Beach R-68+200 to R-72+600 10,620 2.0 22.71 241,149
Total: 24,616 4.7 17.03 419,120
As reflected in Table 2 below, and per volume calculations conducted by Atkins using data
provided by CPE, the 2013 project design proposes: (a) 59,156 cy for Vanderbilt, (b) Ocy (No
Fill)for Pelican Bay, (c) 121,074 cy for Park Shore, and (d) 207,165 cy for Naples Beach.
Table 2. 2013 Project Design,Atkins Volume Summary
Reach R-Monuments Length Atkins Volumes
(FT) (MILES) (CY/FT) (CY)
Vanderbilt R-25+500 to R-30+500 5,082 1.0 11.64 59,156
Pelican Bay - 0 0.0 0.00 0
R-43+600 to R47+500
Park Shore T-50 to R-54+400 8,914 1.7 13.58 121,074
R58A-400 to R-64+500
Naples Beach R-68+200 to R-72+600 10,620 2.0 19.51 207,165
Total: 24,616 4.7 15.74 387,395
2
Packet Page-417-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Figure 1. Vanderbilt,Pelican Bay,Park Shore,and Naples Beach Location Map
R BAREFOOT BEACH ■`•..it
'r.
4MtGG)NSPASS r ,!..4
I TALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE
4
DELNOR-WICGI 1'"-v PROJECT ORLANDO
STATE PARK h T,S LOCATION TiAA1PA • A A
� OCCAN
VANDERBILT
ILT LEE� HENDRY CO.
' B A
RATO
N MIAMI'Jcc VANDERBILT *I.-ool BEACH c t, ,,s" a u F
N 700000
s'�
// MEXICO
-s�,o NS F,.R30 MOI cI co. w i
,� tt MEXICO °a
4.1 F``� 'I PELICAN °
\ '
", k BAY
IT u
PARK —,, R!0
SHORE •. ���y
CLAM PASS TEA
x a SR 896
PERMITTED Ncauxzra
ram /1 PEPELINE 4 ° l
I CORRIDOR ..--- r\ i
----a,..-...-.a...,–— ––_ N'n___Tt y�!§� -L_ (� PARK SHORE
f _Ci.. _ 11
1 PROPOSED —' - 1
i PIPELINE oocr,Rs,�4ss f� , SR MS
) CORP:IDOR % MO
1 I� _ *,
J N.
t 1
20' CONTOUR �` 0
f 41
I J +^ NAPLES
,, SR ass
NAPLES �"
N �� - r 3� \ 1111 N550La01
+ -t.
° +G s SR
L___A l
LEGEND! - . 1 1 \
= PERMITTED PIPELINE CORRIDOR 1 '' 1L—. lI
PROPOSED PIPELINE CORRIDOR ^` l \ j
{ PROJECTLMT$ Ip0 °:;,. ,:x.,
W.// PROPOSED FILL AREAS GULF I���-,ct�?} } _ I_ {
NE PRoFOSE0mEAR HOt2E 71,,\.., i 4
OPERA.TIONA.AREAS OF i o.Pi`�� `�
® PERMITTED OFFSHORE M�/C0 II
OPERATIONAL AREAS I T ROYAL
` G RTO FDEP MONLI N[S y \
3#QTI=S' GORC.ti7ty PASS Shy' \
t. COORDINATES Akt 1 1 4 r t1T ° ,
9ASED ON GLORIDA SATE _ �'I 0 49G0 B0Jt`•PLA.4 E COORDIN ATE Sr ST3.t
EASE ZONE,NORTH AMERICAN '�'- 4 �.
£a?T)ttO iiii;NAO 1, _ \jt ; I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT
2. '-I_L WIDTHS ARE HOT TO SCALE, 1 't
(CPE, 2012)
3
Packet Page-418-
1/22/2013 Item 11 .A.
H. ENGINEERING DESIGN REVIEW
A. FILL VOLUMES
i. Design Matrix
As identified in the November 2012 "Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project
Description with Engineering and Design Summary" prepared by CPE "the method used to
determine fill volumes is based on beach width, erosion rates, hardbottom, and design life."
Development of the total design volume can be placed in the following categories:
• Volume required to achieve minimum design beach
• Advanced Nourishment — Volume required to maintain the minimum design beach for a
period of six (6) years, based on composite erosion rates specific to each R-Monument.
• Volume required to address projected future erosion from the date of the August 2012
survey to the 2013 construction timeframe.
• Special Adjustments for taper sections, minimum fill densities, and additional volumes
needed based upon modeling.
Simple geometry, composite erosion rates, and engineering judgment were used to define
specific volumes for each of the categories above.
Volume -Minimum Design Beach
The following equation was used by CPE to determine the volume (Vol) required to achieve the
minimum design beach:
Vol = w(B +h*)deff
Where:
w=distance between 2012 MHWL and the minimum design beach width (ft)
B =berm height (+4.0ft NAVD88)
h*= absolute value of the depth of closure elevation (-11.3ft NAVD)
Jeff= effective alongshore distance (ft)
As reflected in Appendix E (Design Matrix) of the November 2012 "Collier County Beaches
2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering and Design Summary", prepared
by CPE, the total volume required to achieve the minimum design beach is 119,303 cubic yards.
4
Packet Page-419-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
According to the Design Matrix, of the 24 R-Monument profiles within the 2013 project area,
only 10 of the profiles violate the minimum design beach width according to the location of the
2012 MHWL. These ten profiles are identified as hotspots that additional fill material would be
required to meet the design criteria.
Volumes - Advanced Nourishment and Future Erosion
The development of the advanced nourishment volume by CPE, as reflected in the Design
Matrix, is generally consistent with the design approach commonly used by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) where the "advanced nourishment" is intended to address erosion rates
throughout the proposed design life of a project. The volumes required for advanced nourishment
were based upon long-term annualized erosion rates developed by CPE for the periods from:
• 1996 to 2004; and
• 2006 to 2012
The 2005 erosion rate was not included because it was the year of the nourishment project. More
recent maintenance nourishment events were included in the composite erosion rate.
Volumes—Special Adjustments
Special adjustment volumes account for (a) a minimum fill density of 10 cy/ft, (b) additional
volumes based upon modeling, and (c) taper sections. It is a commonly accepted practice for
engineers to utilize experience and judgment to adjust design volumes as they deem appropriate,
as reflected in the special adjustments calculated by CPE.
The methodology utilized in the Design Matrix to define preliminary project volumes is
considered wholly acceptable and appropriate.
ii. Design Drawings
Design drawings were developed by CPE using the Design Matrix as a basis for development of
beach fill design templates. The data for the design drawings prepared by CPE was provided to
Atkins in XYZ coordinate format.
Atkins calculated volumes for the 2013 project using the "average end area" methodology
utilizing (a) XYZ coordinates provided by CPE; and (b) effective distances identified in the
Design Matrix. Please note that Atkins modified the effective distances for the tapers in the
project areas when calculating the volumes based on the design drawings. As reflected in Table 3
below for the project area:
• Atkins' volume calculation is 387,395cy and
• CPE's Design Matrix volume calculation is 419,120cy.
5
Packet Page-420-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Although CPE also used the "average end area" methodology to calculate volumes as reflected in
the Design Matrix, the distinction between Atkins volume calculations and CPE's volume
calculations is in the approach to calculating the taper volumes. CPE used engineering judgement
and knowledge gained from the design and performance of the previous project to determine the
taper volume required. A comparative summary of the volumes as calculated by Atkins and the
Design Matrix volumes as prepared by CPE can be found in Appendix B.
To further verify volume calculations, Atkins used (a) a separate "average end area" volume
calculation and (b) a "surface to surface" comparison in AutoCAD Civil3D. Both methods
supported the volume as calculated by Atkins. Please note that the 2013 project volumes
calculated by Atkins are 31,725cy less than the Design Matrix volume (see Table 3 and
Appendix B). The differences between the design drawing volumes as calculated by Atkins and
the CPE Design Matrix volumes appear to be:
• differences in approaches used to calculate taper volumes,
• differences in design drawing and design template fill densities, and
• a result of reduced fill templates at specific locations where nearshore hardbottom had the
potential to be impacted.
The following differences in the design volumes have been noted based on the comparison
between the Design Matrix and the design drawing volumes calculated by Atkins:
• Vanderbilt—568cy reduction
• Park Shore—2,827cy reduction
• Naples Beach—33,984cy reduction
Although there is a difference between Atkins' and CPE's volume calculations of approximately
31,725cy it should be noted that:
• this volume accounts for less than 10% of the total project volume and
• additional changes in volumes are expected to occur based upon:
• changes in beach conditions throughout the project area prior to construction and
• potential revisions to the project design that may occur during the permitting process.
i-e
6
Packet Page-421-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Table 3. Comparison Summary of Design Matrix Volumes and Design Drawing Volumes
ttl Design Volume
Reach R Monuments Leng CPE Matrix" Atkins Volumes(2)
(FT) (MILES) (CY/FT) (CY) (CY/FT) (CY)
Vanderbilt R-25+500 to R-30+500 5,082 1.0 11.75 59,724 11.64 59,156
Pelican Bay - 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.00 0
R-43+600 to R47+500
Park Shore T-50 to R-541+100 8,914 1.7 13.27 118,247 13.58 121,074
R58A-400 to R-64+500
Naples Beach_ R-68+200 to R-72+600 10,620 2.0 22.71 241,149 20.23 214,794
Total: 24,616 4.7 17.03 419,120 15.74 387,395
Notes: (1)Derived from CPE 2012"Design Matrix for 6-Year Renourishment Interval"in Appendix E of
the"Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering and
Design Summary'
(2)Volumes derived by Atkins utilizing point files,elev ation s,an d drawings provided .. .
by CP&E
B. MODELING RESULTS
As reflected in the October 2011 "Collier County Conceptual Renourishment Project Analysis —
Numerical Modeling Report" prepared by CPE, extensive modeling was conducted to evaluate
multiple alternatives and their effects on nearshore waves, hydrodynamic flow, and alongshore
shoreline change.
CPE modeled 11 design alternatives using the Delft 3D-WAVE software to conduct a detailed
wave investigation. The results of the wave investigation were then used to drive both the
Delft3D-FLOW (hydrodynamic flow) and UNIBEST-CL+ (alongshore shoreline change)
models.
It was noted that although 11 design alternatives were evaluated during the modeling effort, none
of the design alternatives were the 2013 project design because after the modeling phase was
complete the design parameters were changed. The modeling alternative to rebuild the 2006
project (referred to as Alternative 1 in the CPE modeling report) most closely matches the 2013
project design.
In some cases, during the design process, intensive numerical modeling is conducted early in the
design process for preliminary design alternatives. Changes to the actual design may occur
following completion of the numerical modeling for a variety of reasons. These reasons may be,
but are not limited to, results of the modeling, potential impacts to environmental resources,
changes to the project objectives, and design criteria. This appears to be the case for the
modeling efforts conducted by CPE.
The data, methods, and approach are reasonable and acceptable based on our review of the
modeling conducted by CPE.
7
Packet Page-422-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
C. CONSTRUCTION METHODS
As reflected in the November 2012 "Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project
Description with Engineering and Design Summary" prepared by CPE, an evaluation of potential
construction methodologies was conducted. It was noted that the 2013 project is proposing the
option of the use of either an offshore sand source or an upland sand source to construct the
project.
Given our experience with previous fill projects that were permitted and bid to allow the use of
an offshore sand source or an upland sand source, this allowance can facilitate `competitive
bidding' between dredge contractors and contractors proposing the use of upland sand.
This approach is considered appropriate and favorable due to the extensive distance between the
project areas and the offshore borrow area.
D. EVALUATION OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE
i. Design Life
The design life for the 2013 project is six (6) years, as reflected in November 2012 "Collier
County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering and Design
Summary", prepared by CPE.
An evaluation of the proposed six (6) year design life indicates that the project will likely meet
and potentially exceed expectations.
As identified in the Design Matrix section above, CPE developed and utilized long-term
annualized erosion rates to determine the volume required to maintain the minimum design
beach width for a period of six (6) years.
The approach used by CPE to identify the long-term annualized erosion rate is considered an
acceptable approach. The use of the long-term annualized erosion rate is expected to "dampen"
the signature of volume change anomalies associated with storm events, small scale maintenance
nourishment events, or other unusual changes in sediment transport trends throughout the project
area.
The methodology used by CPE to determine the design life of the 2013 project (design matrix,
advanced nourishment, and special adjustments) was the same method used in 2006, and that
project achieved its design life.
ii. Avoidance of Hardbottom
As noted in the Introduction of this report, a primary requirement of the design is no impact to
nearshore hardbottom. Impact to hardbottom can be characterized as direct burial of nearshore
hardbottom attributable to the placement of fill material.
8
Packet Page-423-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Assessment of potential hardbottom impacts is generally predicted utilizing the "cross-shore
adjustment" of fill material known as "equilibration". Equilibration occurs when fill material
placed within the design template "adjusts" and some of the fill material migrates seaward of the
constructed template. Material erodes from the upper portion of the fill template and accretes at
the lower portion of the profile. The seaward extent which the fill is projected to migrate is
identified as the predicted equilibrium toe of fill (ETOF). The location of the predicted ETOF is
then compared to the landward edge of hardbottom. If the predicted ETOF is seaward of the
landward edge of hardbottom then there is a potential for impacts to hardbottom resources to
occur.
An example of the equilibration of a design template is reflected in Figure 2 below. Figure 2
contains a profile derived from CPE permit sketches, dated November 9, 2012, at R-59 which
identifies:
•
Erosional portion of the design template
• Accretional portion of the profile
• Equilibrium toe of fill; and,
• Landward edge of hardbottom
There are numerous methodologies that can be applied to develop an equilibrium profile.
Appropriate methodologies are generally selected via "engineering judgment" as each project
site has unique factors and characteristics that affect how the fill material might equilibrate.
Some of the factors include, but are not limited to, a) borrow source grain size distribution, b)
project site bathymetry; and, c)nearshore wave climate.
9
Packet Page-424-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
n Figure 2. Example of Equilibrium Profile at R-59 derived from CPE drawing
R-59
-----
— — — E J LIBR JV :'KCCFILE
?— HARD
r----5:1 SLOPE
/ F
5 , EL. = 4.;-.) FT.
EL= ;.0_T_
•
w v -}�
r°
Equilibrium
Toe of Fill
Erosion
W
Landward Edge of
/Hardbottom
r — Accretion /(/
-15 I I i I
,^E Fr'—lei :'A by VE :T `FEET`
The equilibrium profile methodology applied by CPE for the 2013 project is known as the
"profile translation" method. The profile translation method is generally used when (a) a project
is a "renourishment" project utilizing the same borrow source as was used for the previous
project or (b) the borrow source has a similar grain size distribution as that of the existing beach.
It is assumed that the fill material will assume a similar shape to that of the existing beach or a
historical profile which has been deemed to represent an appropriate equilibrium profile shape
within the project area.
As part of their evaluation of the 2006 project performance and equilibration, CPE conducted the
following comparisons:
• The change in distance between the depth of closure (-11.3ft NAVD88) and observed
ETOF (referred to as the "Point of Intercept" by CPE) for historical profiles to show a
landward migration of the active profile,
• The submerged length of the active historical profile (above depth of closure) to
determine the most representative historical monitoring profile (determined to be 2011)
to be used for the profile translation method; and,
10
Packet Page-425-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
• The added beach width compared to the change in the depth of closure along historical
profiles.
When comparing the depth of closure and the observed ETOF CPE utilized "averaged" profiles
to characterize each of the three reaches using a single profile for each reach. The associated
profiles utilized to develop the"averaged"profiles are as follows:
• Vanderbilt—R-24 to R-28
• Park Shore—R-50 to R-53
• Naples Beach—R-58 to R-60
The purpose of this comparison was to show that:
• The 2006 project fill remained well landward of the depth of closure and
• Even with added beach width, the average profiles reflect a landward recession of the
depth of closure indicating a steepening of the profile.
The submerged lengths of the monitoring profiles were evaluated for all monitoring years from
2006 to 2012 "to identify the most characteristic dataset" to be utilized by CPE to develop the
equilibrium profile via the profile translation method. Please note that CPE deemed the 2011
survey data as the most characteristic data for the following reasons:
• A sufficient amount of time has passed since initial construction to allow for equilibration
of the 2006 project.
• The 2011 submerged active profile lengths were near average.
• The 2011 surveys did not appear to be influenced by storm events.
CPE selected the 2011 profile as the most appropriate for the profile translation, and then utilized
a "mass balance" to determine the cross-shore location of the equilibrium profile. This is
achieved by `sliding' the equilibrium profile landward or seaward along the existing profile until
the total volume of material between the equilibrium profile and the existing profile matches the
volume within the 2013 design template.
At certain R-Monuments within the 2013 project area the predicted ETOF extends close to the
landward edge of hardbottom. This prompted a comparison of the 2006 and the 2013 project
templates at these R-Monuments.
Because the 2006 project resulted in no documented hardbottom impacts, and the 2013 project
will be using a sand source with similar grain size and soil characteristics as the 2006 project, it
may be expected that a similar template for the 2013 project will likely result in no impact.
11
Packet Page-426-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Please note the following R-Monuments and qualitative comparisons of the 2013 templates to
the 2006 templates:
• R-28—Less fill proposed
• R-46—Less fill proposed
• R-51 —Similar amount of fill
• R-53 —Less fill proposed
• R-59— Significantly more fill proposed
Based on the qualitative assessment of fill volumes, it appears that all profiles, except R-59, will
not likely result in impact. Relative to R-59, it is recommended that further evaluation of the
potential impacts to hardbottom be conducted in order to address concerns from Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) about hardbottom impacts at this location.
III. PROJECT COMPARISONS—2013 vs. 2006
This section of the report will provide a:
• detailed explanation of the total quantity of sand to be placed as part of the 2013
renourishment; and
• comparison of the (a) 2013 project Design Matrix and design drawings and (b) 2006
project design.
A. 2013 PROJECT
The 2013 project, as calculated by Atkins using data provided by CPE identifies a total volume
of 387,395 cy over 4.7 miles of beach which will result in an average fill density of
approximately 15.7 cy/ft. As identified in the Design Matrix and in the FDEP permit application
file, the total volume, as calculated by CPE, is 419,120 cy. A comparison of these volumes is
presented in Table 3 below. As discussed in previous sections, the Design Matrix volumes are
based upon composite erosion rates and the 6 year project design life. The fill quantities from the
Design Matrix appear to have been modified at specific R-Monuments throughout the project
area to maintain a "no impact to the nearshore hardbottom" design. This resulted in a further
reduction in fill volumes at specific profile locations throughout the project area. Additionally,
taper volume calculations in the Design Matrix appear to be based on engineering judgment.
12
Packet Page-427-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Table 4. Comparison of 2013 Project Design Matrix and Design Drawing Volumes
Design Volume
Reach R-Monuments Length") Matrix") Atkins Volumes(2) Difference
(FT) (MILES) (CY/FT)1 (CY) (CY/FT) (CY) (CY/FT) (CY)
Vanderbilt R-25+500 to R-30+500 5,082 1.0 11.75 59,724 11.64 59,156 0.11 568
Pelican Bay - 0 0.0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
R-43+600 to R47+500
Park Shore T-50 to R-5'1+100 8,914 1.7 13.27 118,247 13.58 121,074 -0.32 -2,827
R58A-400 to R-64+500
Naples Beach R-68+200 to R-72+600 10,620 2.0 22.71 241,149 19.51 207,165 3.20 33,984
Total: 24,616 4.7 17.03 419,120 15.74 387,395 1.29 31,725
Notes: (1)Derived from CP&E 2012"Design Matrix for 6-Year Renourishment Interval"in Appendix E of the"Collier County
Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering and Design Summary"
(2)Volumes derived by Atkins utilizing point files,elevations,and drawings provided by CP&E
B. 2006 PROJECT
The 2006 project volumes for the pre-construction (Sept/Nov 2005) to immediate post-
construction (June 2006) were 667,562 cy over 8.4 miles of beach, which resulted in a placed fill
density of about 15 cy/ft.
An evaluation of the total volume of material required to rebuild the 2006 design on the 2012
surveys was also conducted. Table 5 below reflects that a total of 408,005cy of material would
be required and would result in an average fill density of 21.55 cy/ft. Please note that:
• Vanderbilt would require 78,430 cy
• Pelican Bay would require 20,850 cy
• Park Shore would require 117,810 cy
• Naples Beach would require 190,915 cy
Table 5. Summary of 2006 Project Volumes
t2) Volume
Reach R-Monuments Length As Built Rebuild on 2012 Surveys(3)
(FT) (MILES) (CY/FT) (CY) (CY/FT) I (CY)
Vanderbilt R-22 to R-31 8,798 1.7 13.81 121,487 8.91 78,430
Pelican Bay R-31 to R-37 6,102 1.2 9.33 56,955 3.42 20,850
Park Shore R-45 to R-55 10,543 2.0 13.44 141,739 11.17 117,810
Naples Beach R-58A to R-79 18,935 3.6 18.35 347,381 10.08 190,915
Total: 44,3781 8.4 15.04 667,562 21.55 1 408,005
Notes: (2)Derived from CP&E 2012"Design Matrix for 6-Year Renourishment Interval"in Appendix E of the
"Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project Description with Engineering and Design
Summary"
(3)Volumes derived by Atkins utilizing point files,elevations,and drawings provided by CP&E
13
Packet Page-428-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
The 408,005cy of sand required to rebuild the 2006 template is very close to the total volume
determined by CPE's design matrix for the 2013 beach fill project of 419,000cy.
C. COMPARISON SUMMARY
The 2006 project entailed placement of 667,562cy of material over 8.4 miles of beach, while the
2013 project proposes 387,395cy of material over 4.7 miles of beach. This is a 42% reduction in
total volume and a 44% reduction in project length. This comparison of reduction in project
volume and length from the 2006 project to the 2013 project indicates a very slight increase of
fill densities from 15cy/ft for the 2006 project to 15.7cy/ft for the 2013 project. So the overall
volume placed in 2013 will not be as much as in 2006, but slightly more volume will be placed
per linear foot of beach.
The increase in fill densities reflects a "larger" fill template at locations where fill is being
proposed. However, it should be noted that there are locations where the 2013 fill template is a
"smaller" fill template (Please see Appendix A). Figure 3 below shows a larger fill density at T-
• 62, which is in the Naples Beach reach. At T-62 the 2006 project entailed 8.9 cy/ft while the
2013 design entails 18.0 cy/ft.
Please note the following regarding changes in fill densities from 2006 to 2013:
• Vanderbilt reflects a reduction of 2.2 cy/ft
• Pelican Bay is not within the 2013 project area
• Park Shore reflects a slight reduction of 0.7 cy/ft
• Naples Beach reflects an increase of 1.9 cy/ft
Modifications to the 2013 project volumes as compared to the 2006 project can be attributed to
the the Design Matrix which utilized background erosion rates and special adjustments based on
engineering judgment. The slight increase in fill densities described above can be directly
attributable to the development of the overall 2013 project design.
14
Packet Page-429-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
Figure 3. Comparative Profile at T-62
T-62 PROFILE
20- 2006 BEACH FILL TEMPLATE y , _ 20
LANDWARD CREST EL.3.7'(NAVD 88)
2013 BEACH FILL TEMPLATE
LANDWARD CREST EL.4.0'(NAVD 88)
'2006 BEACH FILL TEMPLATE
",,r p,` SEAWARD CREST EL.2.7'(NAVD 88), m
9 2013 BEACH FILL TEMPLATE
• _ -_�(SEAWARD CREST EL.3.0'(NAND 88), 0 O
4 SEAW --
-10
LiJ
w
-20 - -- -- _ _ -20
CROSS SECTIONAL VOLUME:
X2006(8.9 CUBIC YARDS)
X2013(18.0 CUBIC YARDS)
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00
The comparison between the 2013 and the 2006 beach fill templates are shown in Appendix A in
plan and profile view for each monument in the project area. The most noticeable difference in
the plan view comparison between the two templates is the 2013 project does not cover as much
area as the 2006 project. Areas that were nourished in 2006 but do not require the minimum 10
cy/ft fill density have been removed from the 2013 project. Please note that the minimum 10
cy/ft fill density is generally the minimum fill density under which a dredging contractor can
effectively construct the fill template. These areas include:
15
Packet Page-430-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
• Vanderbilt Beach north of R-25+500
• Pelican Bay and Clam Pass Beaches from R-31 to R-43
• Park Shore Beach from R-48 to T-50
• Naples Beach from R-65 to R-68, and R-73 to R-79
While these areas may not have sand placed directly in these locations as it was in 2006, the
beach fill template will equilibrate and these areas may see benefit from longshore sand transport
from the nourished areas. For the majority of the project the seaward limit (toe) of the 2013
beach fill template is landward of the 2006 design. The exceptions to this are found in the north
taper of Park Shore near R-44, and R-58A to T-62 in Naples Beach, which were hotspots
identified in during the six (6) years of post construction monitoring of the 2006 project and
identified as areas requiring additional fill.
Comparing the 2013 and 2006 beach fill templates in profile view, the templates look very
similar. Some translation of the template was required to accommodate the fill densities
calculated in the Design Matrix and to meet the minimum beach width requirements. The 2006
template included a compound beach fill slope that transitioned from a 10:1 slope to a 15:1 slope
at MHWL. The 2013 slope keeps a consistent 10:1 beach fill slope for the entire lower portion of
the profile. Figure 4 shows the comparison between the 2013 and 2006 beach fill templates at R-
28.
Figure 4. Comparative Profile at R-28
R-28 PROFILE
20 i 20
UPPER BERM CREST
1 5H:1V SLOPE'
10 ."""'LOWER BERM CRES1j.._.... i .10
1.
,� 10H:1V SLOPE l
Q i , .51 1S.Iy.,_ III 1�L�T� -_I
0,.-....,,,,...",-1,,- ,-_----T- .,=,`t-,°....,*._r....._..,„,.______.„.„....,,___,_,,.4.______=„,.......____._ 0 ,
. , ti
2
u_ -r
z 1�R m
10 ' I _10
w I I -
W 20 , j -20
t
0+00 2+00 4+00 6+00 8+00 10+00 12+00 14400
LEGEND:
---EXISTING GROUND ---MEAN HIGH WATER(0.33 NAVD88)
----2006 DESIGN BEACH FILL TEMPLATE -'-MEAN LOW WATER(-1.68 NAVD88)
2013 DESIGN BEACH FILL TEMPLATE
-w"-HARDBOTTOM LANDWARD LIMIT
/�
16
Packet Page-431-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
IV. DESIGN APPROACH EVALUATION
In order to evaluate the expected efficacy of the 2013 project design, Atkins evaluated CPE's
proposed design based on the following criteria:
(a) minimum design beach for a period of six (6) years;
(b) no impact to nearshore hardbottom.
The overall design approach utilized by CPE is fundamentally sound and appropriate based upon
our review of the data, documents, design drawings, and reports as prepared and provided by
CPE. The design approach is also consistent with the design approach commonly used by the
USACE where the "advanced nourishment" is intended to address erosion rates throughout the
proposed design life of a project.
Based upon our review of the design matrix, design drawings and reports as prepared and
provided by CPE, the total quantity of sand to be placed on the beach in 2013 per CPE's
approach is 419,120cy. Atkins' verified using independent volume calculation methods which
yielded a volume of 387,395cy (within 10% of the volume by CPE). Atkins calculated volumes
for the 2013 project using the "average end area" methodology utilizing (a) XYZ coordinates
provided by CPE; and (b) effective distances identified in the Design Matrix. Atkins modified
the effective distances for the tapers in CPE's Design Matrix based on the design drawings. The
differences between the design drawing volumes as calculated by Atkins and the CPE Design
Matrix volumes are:
• Atkins' volume calculation is 387,395cy and
• CPE's Design Matrix volume calculation is 419,120cy.
The 2013 project volumes calculated by Atkins are 31,725cy less than the Design Matrix volume
(see Table 3 and Appendix B). To further verify volume calculations, Atkins used (a) a separate
"average end area" volume calculation and (b) a "surface to surface" comparison in AutoCAD
Civil3D. Both methods supported the volume as calculated by Atkins. The areas at the end of the
nourishment template segments, or taper volumes, are predominantly where the variance exists
between the CPE and Atkins volumes.The difference in volumes is within 10% of the total
volume of the project and due to engineering judgement exercised by CPE to increase the
volumes in the taper sections.
The comparative profiles in Appendix A show the computed quantity of sand per linear foot
required to rebuild the 2006 beach fill template and the amount proposed for the 2013 beach fill
template.
The Comparative Volumetric Summary in Appendix B indentifies the amount of sand to be
placed at each profile for each segment of the project (Vanderbilt, Park Shore& Naples).
17
Packet Page-432-
1/22/2013 Item 11 .A.
The assumptions are listed in CPE's Design Matrix under Special Adjustments and include taper
sections, minimum fill densities, and additional volumes needed based upon modeling. The
methodology used by CPE to determine the design life of the 2013 project (design matrix,
advanced nourishment, and special adjustments) was the same method used in 2006, and that
project achieved its design life.
Figures 3 & 4 in the report are examples of the profile comparisons in Appendix A detailing
variations in the 2006 and 2013 beach fill template design.
The 2013 project does have a slightly higher fill density (15.7 cy/ft in 2013 to 15.0 cy/ft in 2006)
meaning slightly more volume will be placed per linear foot of beach. R-44, and R-58A through
T-62 required fill beyond the 2006 template in order to address hotspots that were identified
through yearly monitoring reports. The additional fill required based on the design matrix at R-
59 increases the potential for impact to nearshore hardbottom per the equilibrium toe of fill
analysis, but based on the 2006 project performance this concern is alleviated.
The CPE Design Matrix is an engineering analysis that consists of calculations to determine total
beach fill volume based on the minimum beach width, erosion rates, advanced placement of fill
material, special adjustments and the 6 year project design life.
The proposed 2013 beach nourishment project has less total volume than the 2006 project
(667,000cy), because the total project length was reduced from 44,378 ft. (8.4 mi.) to 24,616 ft.
(4.7 mi.) based on need and past project performance. The total project length has been reduced
and consequently less volume is being placed. The 2013 project does have a slightly higher fill
density (15.7 cy/ft in 2013 to 15.0 cy/ft in 2006) meaning slightly more volume will be placed
per linear foot of beach. This is due to subtle differences in the project areal extent and profile
geometry. R-44, and R-58A through T-62 required fill beyond the 2006 template in order to
address hotspots that were identified through yearly monitoring. The additional fill required
based on the design matrix at R-59 increases the potential for impact to nearshore hardbottom
per the equilibrium toe of fill analysis, but based on our review of the 2006 project performance
this area is not expected to cause impact.
The design criteria necessitates (a) a minimum design beach for a period of six (6) years and (b)
no impact to nearshore hardbottom. The design approach utilized by CPE is a) consistent with
the design approach commonly used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) where the
"advanced nourishment" is intended to address erosion rates throughout the proposed design life
of a project; and, b) fundamentally sound and appropriate based upon our review of the data,
documents, design drawings, and reports as prepared and provided by CPE.
The 2013 beach fill template proposed by CPE is appropriate to meet these criteria based upon
Atkins' assessment of the design and our experience monitoring the project areas since 2006.
18
Packet Page-433-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
V. REFERENCES
Atkins, Inc., Collier County 2012 Coastal Monitoring Report, October 2012
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Beach Renourishment Project Three Year
Post-Construction Monitoring Report, September 2009
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Conceptual Renourishment Project
Analysis, May 2011, Revised October 2011
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Collier County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishment Project
Description with Engineering and Design Summary, November 2012
•
•
19
Packet Page -434-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
APPENDIX A—PLAN VIEW AND COMPARATIVE PROFILES
20
Packet Page-435-
I I 0 I w I w I o I U I to I a
LLVO 01111911,01101110 r.w.nc+r.nrm
• . � 1118a30NVA 31V 1dW31 1111 HOtl39 III.°
....:- -NOIS30 133POad 1 ;
\% �,.�,a�w....-°�°P '''' Z Ill; o o q c DU 1.111 71
l m m
v JR 1f2 1— dd g' \I ..r
.s .W. a^p"° �
..ao...w ro1K 19]AYN
oM10 3014916110X 1 OM < I g 4 i
A...'',.0 -nv. w.«. ar,....9.I .LLNflO3 N3M00 I e I ii
•
1 I - .,
III,-: C 1 ' h w
721 tg
r 1 —-�1:-ice a 4t m LL ll L.L.p Z W_ W
�N ' d 3 o.C9101000 =u) —cl) Q0
'... qq
I/'� ., r i .W} ZD_ NNNNwit wil
. %-ter' ls._r J Q _A '� 4 1 '� O H 1 U O :,
I o ' . w
vi 1 r.�r N
1
ci
- r L1J
I
r' 1 v_ o
— ', it e , Ai 1-11 1—
I .\ -m--7.-,\-- --�/ > I ::; # r
•
Leti I 1 r J - ".Asxu 3 0S Z - ,--�
:ow
1 , ..,..k, ... _ .. „ '- 14p,,kit.M 472..„:„.„.!",..:-.0,:uir ,„-:,,I.,•-,..:•. , r4i).
9 i Yjr.....:i... 01
to
.. . 4 - k z} co
k
I / 1 . la Lt°-a �-•/ <<
I 1o
1 1 ,
t 0- ffiI ;.,-''sg`
Fil
CO I
OI 1
j
i 21
I I I I 0 1 ��'• 1 I".. :'"
!.t.,I I
:::.::::?..,-,",,;t,i,?!...r..:5::...:.:::',.:..!:?::,
,:x!5.k.,,,,..,.."..:i..11,: -','..„._.-4'''•..'..-.'.
' I - - , h'- `•mac
_ 1 ��
L J'
3NIlH�lb!W 00£-�
I 1 :: a .5m HD1VA%
3NlHOlbW ' 0E-o 1 �::,,1;:, :a• ; .,
I I I a w 1 o I I m NI"a H 1bW
--as u+ b101rw...Woo..N name wdoMmM rt rm
I I 0 I LL I w I O I 0 I m I Q
31Ya apnea Temao ��.r..,.....r „ -"'•°44°•'•"'° 11192130NVA-31V1dW3111Id HOV39
a.e... ^:.°®"�. •.�.• N'JIS30 1O3I021d 71f .
..w.4.. ,.,. °m m
°.." ::'". r te.: M3IA321933d-J. Od321 t$'°LL LL e
tea; ^ ;,;'��4MP.11 'JNRIOLNOW HOV39 JLLNf O3 21311lOO,,,y v
*ea+....�∎..w........
.w nrvw.wu...r.w�nmx+i+.vwaa ta1K T/'e3TdYN ��`` , g
.wv.r+q.gna.e+��...,..••,••••':. 1NYa idlQeeilON'N eYBL < q p
AiNfOO 21311100 1 1 a ,f
I I 00£-0 =
a I y3NilH21VW Loc-o I t -• �• 13NIlHO1VW -Is,.
�� ? h1•
Ix , 1 • .
1
r
I
I �r Y
i I V 4 1'•I F i -�11 ,', c
., I f r•;. ,"'^t' f 718 s i,
O t •L C:. 'r--
' �Y 'i[ L 5
1�\J\ - / > I •Yom,.''''j,+ . -. 7 �'F
1. I n �-�: . :. . ':,4:4 '}'f:.i" 4_`,•'"•-
♦. .: \ .:. ate. �. �'i A�n•'9>� -
1: _ _
% 1 J I -4 LT, P "1" '4 N \
Li
i . O _44 1 Li/
O 1 ate; d; r ' ,+\r,- v 1t
y - AP nhF, q1£ . c
1 cpr _x•
t
—
?! a;
1 � r x
7' O I-- 1 QED �" 5. a to
i F- X ' x`0,1, �{ ,�a-z�• r } W U Z LL �
,•A� ,� � f— a � w
fl' J
m ( �d 1 M...: ` 4 -ri < F— OOOm2JOU im
1 H Q C'1 j ! ''a lea .7,y,,- K F, W J J J 1 Z i,
I :,-1 O _It 1 - .* :v� f O] Z HHHHI 0 , 001
.-7\ 161-13 I It�� ]I i . W W
i. f ., +�'� a r.. r O Z 8 M M s ,7) s Z Q yp
A
i1. 1 `, Ofl CC CV NI W �Om p�W
' N 1 ..,--,-7,:-:.:.
rh ` s !l ,g W I Q l u 1
1 �� .'"' W I . w
•
_ w I
I 0 LL w 0 U m Q
...-.s►_ W --. w.. .........................
I I 0 I LL I w I o
— �.P' I 0 I m I
(
:UV.]OW Ma IYM1UlMO
,..e.. ..".w.v n,..r :��„,0�,,,.., w - �, „�m„ 3aONS)IWNdJ-IS10M110dW3P3O1ad 11i HOV3a to I
-d
o C N°° o, ...''' '.'":. cli
• "'""",_.:
= I o I a I w I o I 0 I m a
alma apnea iv,l o .i.....r....r,.�m
o,s,o ,, , ...,...,,...... ..®°'«".■am,.rurra=.......°'"...« 3210NS M21tld 31tl1dW31l�id H0 d38 (� j II.
.+^_•�-^..... +^--=:::� •N'JIS3a 103POtId
1
Z III!
LA :11"."..L.'"7:::-.47.7..."...-....1""'":1?"......:.sue M31A32s LI33d 1210d321 $-.m m'. o
I r•..141„v ll1;0,;^+;;; ,, „ 'JNRIOlINOW HOtl39£LNI100 21311 00 P- "''
�, ;� ...v..r,,.-,e.s.�r4.e.r�...�y J.NflONG➢QNON'NOOBL �1 i 1 d p E
uN1100/311100 ii 1 I s l
3NI1HOlVW •ZO£-0:' �,
r m -N HOld 3NIlHO1IW -:£QE — w fi
_ I_ co r>- 1— c Z LL W r" 1 +.� �s� aw•
4.4„,,•,-,., ,.,r•„_ ',. ,''' *.A,', Z Z U U)m 0 0 Q Q yr�
Y w w w Q O m LU
i fOMM01
- •— W I x ,, O O Z•L -�\�' - , 1 :. -. '4s.- i44. ; .7:,�'•�s 0_ N N N N W C7
a W I I
i ;$114,, 741.474,.
• f
•• }t } '6? µiA13{ t T�N�6WC } 1•
J ,r. I 4•
'i wo e 9170�{ > 11,,,.:;?.'-' _,;.,•44;...o,-o L._ ``nn•I
I
1. (.•∎• w 1 =1I{ p " mW �\ t, fl. '+
/ / 1 m �� ':
.\ W 1• m w : 1 w...':::.:',7, ''' s M•
a t • I• s ,� i i t _ (t d ti-- � ' I ,T >s ` 4:'•.':... s' �� f �: •
ri_hI. �y,`&` . .-4474.,e........,,,,, c ,a! w`. # t•
\ o} —t' C. a ' .� •
"!, ' . .., x s. . 7z-"y Pa z p. .: t J .. 1 r1 •• I
• \ 721 g_-'.•
•
ro 1 _ < •
UO I i r I L :fir. *-0-'4'....'....- % 1 <•
• 1, ‘.,• F" ti'•
\, .. > ham`` ,..._ g t' S.
"1 q of $'
NI1H31VY11 • . : E0£-3 1'." . '.
3NIn-l3IvW. .•. • '70E-0 •1.i• Y3! '"'� � 117H�1,�r
I (7 a ,'•.� 91! �uw emu., ..t_._.
0 0 m a
M-!s__ SIR•O IMS.M.M/M.,.Yl.11.11 i,q.1.0lP,MIQ.A 4.11
I I 0 I 0. I w I o I 0 I m I Q
:uvO Oansp nxNSaao .�x,»uv x..ur a..�.�".�....�.w"'""'"."".'"�.. 3210HS H21Vd-31V1dW311111 H3V39
2 r.. • �.11.°.<:�.� N°JIS30103P021d t"
�I _ Z 'ill ��mm
""r"':a:.����p
' "3212133d-1210d321
�� °� "�:x::,....�....w. eJNRIOIINOWH0V39 LLNI10021311100 f v
..'°....w�.. .e",.....a....4.+.M rosxv'aawvn r f x' YY x
r a.ro0 MONYasnON•N 0012 c li I 8 6
i` .
�� •"
""'"'"7.;""7'.'''''''''.==0:-.Z7+ A1NI100 21311100 i /-�••Z3NIH31VW ,''^`J ,:t 'w � _°: EO£79 'i�. +oa L E `t
1R. Ti - s-.no
_3NIlH31VW 3 .,`..M'?s; rrE4t1•:, 4,. ±TM� PO£7 I ■ ;
I �•
J
fiat
ti
x •. r J ‘.',5 Si F ' =�^" Z W JJJI_ I- 0 K•
.:',,':,I, .�'.,., 4%;-°"1"..^fir. >: X- `- '113 ` r ,• _ �" - m LL IL 11. Z W W ■?d
J �o 11 `•Z ' QQ U U Ug w U 1
� ,-N., r o-s (. -.jL' ---'1- ?t '�' �. �':'�*li Ce W W W Q 003 w < 10 c!
�' : } m 4 rt ' s .-' d WU' mOom2UJZS
J
, --- 1 : ,f -4N I r 7'. ..,;1 sr� Qcc Q OO O O Q'C1O W rl
--- • ' a -,-, t ' ' '' Q_¢ NNNN W WUfD
tL x " '` A� fir. W I I I I 1
1
f `� .
E
CV I—
r ' x x
.A p '' ,per;; -
i
/ r I A 6vUy xb�r �' k1 ; # 't
— .,) III F , • : `;!' ,".r d .,* UO 'ti
/+ N : I
,... ...-Z-.4.4, --..-- d
s1 L x N
•
s t oA
.1 - - ,' '..• ' ' s .:,, 4.,;„*1-:,-,t'.1. .; .'-,f,:,:.:8;:-..:1;''''';.''..7.,,,.'t'....:-.'e., ,,.. '!,'"--4'.:.•':'''''''..:..41" i..':W'.-":...,' •
`' =; *- 0-f.
1. 1:' ^om a .tk '� ``=-' A . r): •t•• 5� ! Y
a4. , Q`ta '.a
. Y I �'AY"••..r"+x.- 1:yw .i .e�rt ka —
v I .,,i7'. 1 k� e` y .
I • s •rip ,
a
,/ 4,4- . ---,.',.'4).'',..-.' ,r
1 , t v;,,.4:-.,L,;;`;;',.' , ik' r".
141141210014*--1::::: -.4.,50£-� .„ . i i' � � ,.. 3NIl 3 b I
PO£-3 .3NR- i l. :/ 1 `_ :r ` r'' �.y=� , . a3Nh � '
43N114H3 I
I I
0
I a I m I o I 0 1 m I Q
:utl0 OillYtI�YHIDIYD .......a+.y.a..rm
a—..:e.1:.::�.:-::°..« 3210HS�21Vd'31V1dW31 llld H�d38 t
„p q,,,� -N°JIS34103f021d Ki -
� ;� tea.,, nn31n3a a33d laod3a 7__ I', m o
4
......—,.—......,........7.„ 7 'JNR1011NOW H�d38/at/1103119-1100_,- ' v
.�r.�wvau+n.�saa..rwu.nvr.vwa. N/tC w'Yi�d'/M r s
�� \"I r "'",�..rw.e..��.vwww.� 1MIOi0NCIWION'NNI 1 q
� °wvr.....�.°.a.od.
,:� uN110�2131110 < It I 1 a I, i
rQ _ �Yp, a .� i e^� ' •t'q". .".�"-�"' �, �-.cam
_ _
11 AX 1rr,�+47 ` ,�",,-,`':'`�,-„ ii*""-- 'i ` d 0.+x. 4,-.,:' 4a sari ,; t a '. -..-v-;".". .-`7,a.,..-:. >- H d _1 Z 0 (/) k
fV—y 3 y 'Gs .+:`� ak'r 7h m t{r,. ;. P : - ,hs.,,
Q k- f I '` � r a ) Tea [� n -: ` r- Q h' x 6 W°J W U ��i
a�4 u n p * Z LL to m O O Q t'uu
3. 4r '�5x^ ?m~ fi f; Is Ry5 N' s,'iG''.14,;= 1n° s +G ` O -L-ii J,x Z i 2 Q) w
n uZ> , W a * m '2LLx1LLO W W a
r rt ' a� p i "r 1 '740-'"`:".' ' UUU =U 0 h
� ` . {�� '` � k ''' i , � i s + W W W W W Q O m _IC
�r,� OZ Og ZQ
,°-::�- ��t� s �' h '{�` � � fir€ �+�. m S&.� =i�,u,.€"" � 1� � O M M 01 ('�
M �� ,e7-§,-,' i�x� ,� rte' �,,;�'-. .µ ka.- ,T Y O O
A -� -I. � �..N'w OD� OOOOwOO W
p Paste k 9 ' + S W ,aW -c Z4 NNNNW WU.
' �, �r .:, a v':::-.:11::•.,•i-'71-;:4„:_e„;17.":1-t -7-5!,.,,•'x Y*, O 1+ k` «Y3:,.r.�:. r O I P o i I: " J"',"1'; : _of talk i .' 4.-V J I . I I
_."sr ^ a" - t 4i". e'"f """ . sr' ! m r^e° -z 't -9`s" 1-s" '� 1+':..
3* t VI` "' r�# a� '� s , > t , W_ y �r q,; R"Syty .;, (
.. '�" s :3�__}} a. -' z*N" ,, l_ I J q, i" ,�t r° �r{' c -�,- $' :,y
sue '' ".C 1� �1-"'4..-4. 3 i L .;3 ! ..s l 1 _ 0.,t-.41, --, i. { y ,, . ( k
7 � 1 F v _ .tom,. ✓,"-,, ui` ,a 4t I X
+s I r te. -Ya 1 J ` ' _' y€ x.s ,Tf *-:
▪ 1.L - y. a s Y _
J �rx� x
Pi • ▪ O : I. +� c•.
* e� J< °'� w�i' "e ';'oi -.'," €r i` t 1 �_ . ' 'r. m -mss r d ' k 1 ? . - r •":Q
_ �. by ts� � € ,� W-xr
I ia•3s^ °mist .P''°' • ? r,. 6cf
`-----+— s- _ :I? i y 1 ti ''�'' `+s "1 ': ry-,,.i ds 1;` rx' r 6 a°_,...,.„,.....,1„,, ,, :.,,,....., .,iw/•—'\,�' (,• 1 �_ tSg:7?-'--Ny..,,,,,4;,,,,:,,..,::: :,,47,1.!;0:.. a* _.�-�,� a�a a r 3,',k,44,40-'' t "+,b_,,, M
A�
1r• 1 __ +$+ "' .N' R b '' n°.mss f Y t d'
c A"x
j ( ,;` , ,t "'�� :;`' s to "`" (0
x ..Y r 4 fs4 {.a,,tr"v d
,i____.--, ' , t, , , . ,.“,,,,,. ',,,t,,,it-,it2,,,,,,i,,,, -.4, 4 --f-
o
& I " 'w yew q `
U �:�. „ #7,r 4, F o , .
' .� *. - .
•• &I'
,zsoa ;
,. .- ax
4 r �
i r
I 3 ,w 14', xe� ,"I t 'cf,,,,,; rx V V
(_I `` I � air .
=�r.L t #h . a sue. 3 Y-Rsx
3NIlH3IV 4 \ 1 �� '.. "`
V.
o
3NI1HOIV N 90E-�. .; . �°F` 3 "
0
I
I I 0 I a I w I 0 1 0 I m I Q
:ua� o .w ..�......
�,�,,, :.,w.. w 3aOHS N21Vd 31V IdW311 lld HOV39 m
„-^ � N91S30103PO d I l'1111-
't w.t...vn. ::„.77....,........:77:::7.., °w..m°.,.�. wln.r .."� SIP -I?4 4 Ip
`� te..: nn3u�3H a93d i Od3a 1 ... 8
,� �...... ..... ....� �JNRIOLNOW HO d313 A1NflOO 2131��00
C-� .......................,.......,....m
.....0..0.ae E
g''..11 ..... ,.,.a._._.... n.� AINflOO a3rOD .. ,6 A 6 S i �\
3NIlHOIVIN \ SOE r _ �
3NIlH�1VV 90£ . ..
-I = .� Z 1.
I Z W J
�-_i t � ^ J to 1.
Kam;, o wU wLL�
1- a � ZIi w
d OZ m0�U3! CxX=ES02 , ,- }° t q Q\ , I ,
,\ °'t 1- * w . `` ° 2OZ �ommmp�ZV
'\ c I`: � . .� 0= 000 °o�(70 �i
/ h I y w r•ys ZO. NNNN W W Um
W m w
IT W " s a: J I i
1.
4
/, L J g yt'i \ ‘- /7 1.) ".1v:, 2 -7,,=-- k, Ab'''." D ' ' """,,41..,44- "Ii. :Ike':, '''' '.','A ,
�. $qty V i p
'
I g' t`"
: Y '. ! 4
• • A ,.,-.1.1,,.CO j {, W U- ,j" r � s.. �" . l uc 1 r c � f'(
r O _ . :,,i..,,,J 1 = I�,-- J xr x N\----- +s 5�%y � d ts e 1: x R..
Iii,I
(
_- . ... ►► - °I . . , �l..CI-
t t
1 .'r 16n �'ff' W t ss�',`'p iti s`¥" 'no
■
J `.�'�t i , i q tom.-.1•
is a y� . ,u� 14� # � ' m
s
', '7P-,-- .,--2- ' -1,,,,i.7t: 41 J �^- i�f s•i ,. ,,,'''' ,. '.v,-' , 114,ti ,,,,.. - ,p---", t•ch
� 1 Sy.X» � � w i -_I. .! ?dot .�r.+"'w..i.'t
0 I a� � 1 ' W 10 I U I �m I Q
I I 0 I LL I m I 0 I 0 I m I a
■: raaEnearrxnwo mot. y.M,: ..w ..� m�+,1+_y S3ldVN'31MdW31l1I I H3d38
MOKPO
a°��" "`�m.� -NEDIS30103PO21d 2 I��
°-'v , .. .:.e M3IA3212133d 1210d321 '°°° o
�--4=---.--7-0-=---r-7--.„,,,v , °JNRIOIINOW H3d38 A1Nf100 2131��00 1.:::: i g v
�� ...+.'�r� =:: EpIK L'4TN'N tl
••:a.�.wpa`:a�"i. �..owrw� NM109d1CYCNOM'NNSt f g 1 a i
�� ---""".°r°_'_'"� uNI100a311100 ...., u i i a 1
WILIOM°�'-' A L .. 4 'S
j�
r ,t::: ,a tai. s Ty"' _f1` s •xti; ,'Yr �! Z_ J IX wn
Yr s e mod!`''s- �i ., - a.' , Y��,,,�x'. �` pO J0 W a
T_JC i M •y `2 ”,*:- Q~ OJW JWU
�`' '. .: oZU tom OpQ
+MU' /0 a sr'; J J J F. Z(n Nei
...ra a - • ^ Z O
O =_= D m U �H U U m A om A s Ic f i D � DU U0Z
RU
t i , <tX 1
` '`ti : �5.a! F ` .*. ;r� -- -,e?: OZcTsshoO0Z
4.c _ "ak. , :-,;:ii.,...-::..'- , . -444." 0_(2O O O O w U O W
2J i-• . J .' { a9�PrYtL '�! - r i � 0_ N N N N W W U m ..
aspr JI Ii iI I � i I
c Lf 3y vier,?.,t?s..,. — 1: F t �, 'r•Y Min k; p,A
a
-;fib 0 r -. 1n : a'.' ► - . 4,,t ,';' I 4 ' " 1
a O ea,,,,,,,<i;;,4,- fj$ 11 `
u) b8� a fir\ �• �1 C�= , s,.—
U _ .' a s YP p 4° N
— &M - 4 r --its 'Qi •
i o.
\ _ / g
�. ”••..... 1.a
• a 1 "
rI O w ,n 2- _ L. eey•
_ • `-/ ``� ',4 `ea�r{.; ,� 4 :.r - z - r, +'`,^'
l , _` � — .-: �,+.. ,PINT_, , T f` ' . T
to
_ I -2' Y.E— � �Fi _ h r%.; .
_ ` 1 1 ^�1Y NN iR A
s
. \
.:
ce
1.' ,J • ... ^a .? T A ry i 69 + i 1+r t��yr g .e ." q
9N110 '"-- . ''� '.a z LO -D 1 "' t. ''':'1'.. p x .1, i,&,-,=,,,,.,,-,4,,
.'.s.
I' NI'H3IVIN � ,.i:- T ;80£-0 :
1 1 0 1 LL r w I 0 I 0 I m 1 a
.ura oa+¢a■w+ono ._:=?°= S3ldvN-31tl1d113111Id H3V39 t
m..o.. .. ..,.. .,.. .e°.: �°,: N�JIS301�3fOad i it.
•:ate..awn...s.�,.�r.....a.+...w.ru., VI r..F-
11 aiy®::'"' .e►s.e"w.°" -..0 z iii/"5J,G q o
;'4 —.:��°"`. ;� M31A3a a33d taod3a , ,.°m g.
�� �e+„�;� ;- p ONRIOIINOW H3 d39 A1Nn0o 213n1o3 V
g•U .e.,o....—.....w,....... L s
+.°°.,...�..".e..r.^..:.�.:.�.. roxn v'sainrw r 8 a 1
' . \% .m...1.11........1....0.4.1...1.11"� fLNfnoo a3 110 1 6 �\
,, uNnoa a3nloo -.4•
6 jN1l � '•
11rx..' `i ".111, ,� g •iz.: LO = 1"-'',' -" dlr.�w .^'a ,• .. 1"1 -._.
,j ' ,k�r r r:4'. t _ 1 .. 4y. '°,.c pp' ,t 'A Z J
� a 4�-,t"Yr ,.k k . d.,£ :-..=_- 4 -14•* '7r�� -y _ d W F— W LL co
a-J _ 1, oi-O _' CC g-J WU 1
i v ise aE- _ ai + . :.:.�,ay rh a ,!,,, N• i s y ?W J CO) J ,_ Cr O Z a•7a'' . s J '+,,,: �''. On Li L. tL 0Z 0OO w
1 a. O W — W aw
- �c ,4' }�c'f'`S e, ., `J �Y k. g':',.Z., = � � a. �eO4OQ (UIUCZ O� � U "6•
�k.^.j� i•`.- 5 I c W W W Q CL Z cc O CO a
.1 1.:t„ r;i�.:..r�.s x 'k a.a: W Lil m m m 2(J_ in 2/. .
' ±9k .��.,4:`-.. .. x, t«: ` _. ' O t0 M O /�/•1yf Z 4
4r 5{ :,'..,`4 5 O Q O V O•
,,, ' FI 3 'sK r xek. ,7':� .: :p F r .y'rt 4+6�y >r ....r�� .',. „A i ri Z 0. ¢ N N N N W W U co M
l_j xh ¢r dAax 1 1 k e,, .,, it,,, W I ( I I
%_Ji.i:' .b�`. ' nom• a" yN E t•+-y ll ,•rRti: 6'r.it�s.!keN}a� `fie 1 �n I ® i IT 'TN 0
- /pad `y :;.',, µ _ ,,fir 4 l▪4▪• k.,,r.lr
,` Ak. ..t... nl%▪ ` .:;.;i ri', 'YL a �'" a r,. -_ 1 �• 1 1 ,•• _ e .•
u0.
7 _ .• W I
4'� 090-6 i, ` ik° "7 ,- ,k4 ''t
I ' Y Pl�F ..
4,51 -..,.. —, . =—_—__ . [•,-, , .,.., V ...--.0,i-#.I •-,. , ....? -,...,.._,:.... ,,.. .7...:4,
_-.%
.' .f, . n qy r-r . ..•Y , ' O ?
1ativ �: S..:1: V k 4v l s ...ex..- ' 0 — . t .
x:. a rxa k a • 2 • _ a _•
^1 p W 1 ''•.• .•- I #l*fain z U6• P• CC
. . Ssr ,' �� O �. 1 iy..e.. '�Ofr.R '�,='t �"-.'llfq( .•b_ n
_, a� ,:
1 -' 4.*$:--; ,, , „-•._. •:•.... .. E-:.---_-' - ,,,: oe:.` e•. _ mss_ ( $: s` <M _t4=
.:I gas 7f.:••'a«
1 ;t : 1 I ''
qy
�a-- ' " ' �f f �
:aRi31mAI,.a t= a g ?
3N13H�l� 1;' a"i:kc..r; £ �_ a te. 6rs W2 iiri a 9
I I 0 I w I w 0 0 m a
win-Bs v.. -Mww.I Ms. .......+wp.l.M....'
I 1 0 I n I W I o I 0 I I a
:uamnaarNawo mr.w.v.ww "—*°"+ °°""m S3ldVN'31d1d13111I HOV39 III.1
w; —0^9� -NDIS301O3POad - Z if(i d °
ww.p M3IA3a a33d laOd3a a a
....wb «� .. 9NIa011NOW H0V3B AINI103 a3n1OO o 'm. m "
r.------...===..�....°... 9
bsw<wN.wwmw .ONC�'YitdYN ,(
.w.�°tea"w.......211.1.....1.0,1.......*
w....L=:.:w�.r I 1d.C1CYON'N ONE
} (L
le...
.�yyL�.' :u �+ , C�..� uNnoo a3nloo < li I63E g
a�..! I. .7�.Ylr °}i�r,'.,, ;,;,;L iiLa. i , �'Ut.+4•�J v■�' g�O ' j
.]11 pC 4! M � o^h` S _ pC �+,. "+.� •'?£,1•�_ 4r6 ,- x� .. fi 7 .c tom" x = "*-'o,'. 1 '•i•
.__.• ' I-.w
'dr v ,, i" ' _ rK - .� °u . },Y Six , , , r �_ I I. !n
q hL l; �„ .. KEG t � I W LL
s s s>5 ° '} -,- 1- 0 -11-Lim --11110 O D
{ z : OZ � co m000<
f Z,u y t ma ZLLJ U J tLLJ OZ W O W s>d w- : -- i' Itom- y a • m O J
r< i t x r ,YZ901 " 1 !; wLIQWWQOlai- Q
d _i T ''•A ti 4 b'L-:* s r W —J LI d4 , . 0 t,_ 0 V, mmmx0JZx
ni „ } , i wxx ` "'1"-! c. i. 1 QEXZ °o '6M °c[C70ui
(~� '!: s... i co r...---.:.- }gl`tM& G�*" Z Q. N N N N W W C.) m
L ^ 111; . s to '� 4*.. a1� "A '. 'x 'dY +' ." W I I I 1
t� 14 ,, :3x -k. v 1, 49i LL
W
J � a O . 't• ,1 'w." kit' Y .: 'w,- ',„ ,, 4 d � t f '7� ,.� { `Z* ' y k . � ,e ryrt, W .. m xE• 3 , r 3L.L 4 ,,LL
:,s . • " y r •'r. ;t. :x � .. .',�, . ma y` K•>I � .
�! , ' :�� H G.a t A e”' �=a
`.a ;�=; ' i i '� s e� „r; a ~` 8 i
,` ;l. ;0.,� A' • ` " ^ eh 4•� F 3` Gb• ,Mr^ &.: ' � ��y�-w - . _ ':t]
F?4ft;'* e ° : 1 , : , ,•.<L _ L` = s w ," L' i ,. •
:. .ic:,, J e.igg ..4 6:f.i14 i s > '; ,,t " ; t vi J _ t+. ,.. F,, „'� , ;s^+ ° :..• „ ' � 75Gl ,.§.,:. y rK -,i : ' .Ki• � 4•• r. 9 „w;.0. .x.„3 "Y . , w._ .1
' r � . ...•f. ' . f K n .w ' . . '< * Y wg „:1 fN..'t*W _' � 1�.� t L � +�
� p'
_ ij r NS
a
14
•
x . I 3 ,.a. ;.am a 1 . E90-� t. : . n.._� ,
_
s, xyy.Ltxj [. d
— [I _. t•lit ....._...yi 'u�” �?'3 iZPP2LL�`. �, f�
!, k. "�
��. I ,. $. v
.�. `
n * a , ,,, .. * :.„; is.*•' ,
7 ..r..r TA ? r .,r.'...Ti4t'ry.- ...to-,.....,.��." �. - .y
4:'11liY .e,
t t3. i ' ir� dam/ Y
c _ •ice: ' 2 s ° k '
{ _ xf
I :� rt4 ` .
I `�•
++f O� I i 4Id .4 ` 1 N�
c �� �: I ......Ir S .h y k k
JNIIH3'.V n .60£-� °� i 1 �Y ...IA.. r 4.
3N1 140 1MVlf.- �� :Si , , -
I I 0 I LL I m I _ o I 0
m Q .
°Si-OS,, ..lMww 444404.P.44%r.w.\w4,0MwIM4.44.n
I I I a I w I o I 0 I m a
:::Qaf1.W•wMI.2Y0
_____.,...r..
VAN 1/V141 o,�,,, ,, ...m� �� S3ldVN 31V1dW31llld HOV39
.. :..YO;..�.......�...,...�.m 'NOIS3a 1931 o d I� Iii
�,� "="4":"- � �.�: AA31n3a a33d laod3a ,1 '
�'� e„w„�„m;
I I o I LL I m I 0 I 0 I m I a
tri MY 71 1.1 LO MAN:uw Garea WINDOW
iruwm+rs�m
n,m,,, „,� e � S3�dVN•31tl�dW31 llld N�tl39 61
8 v %++-w• ....+-�----a.- - N�JIS341�3P021d Z
...n..▪.., ,. ...�, tiff a a v .-
Y . Y M3IA321 M33d-121pd3i! 1$'m m
! �- +„ .;;, �,s;, ,�� 'JN121011NOW H�V39 A1Nf10o 2J31110°Am Id 1 V
.e., p..�..r,.�...
iNYa iONCiCYON'MWY[ ¢ f ¢ p
�"'t ;� .....-:«w::—__m...,... w A1Nfl0'J M31�10'J i1 1 `3 I I i
�1�13H31 iN L l£-0 i f `m- r ; "' t? ., ° . =:+t•''� � is ar)i ' r�. .1. Z Li,•
_ re
,an 1 } 1 U W
LL co: ° J
Q w OO 0W J YU
I»1� 2 ' a Z co co O p Q s i! '''1!'' q y p• x �ti ra xr w xi::.adl r
s ''' ,.,.• 'ti.; is 1— UQUEU
* a ' 4j: JupJpJi u 1 e ;j�� .� *- -..•
a _` •r'`. rte— riu:�}'Ir. 1 = :. 3 n
I
_ S *1
•� .c> 1 (jay W1 '" y,� y v ,.,;� pir �`. ..'.,-
1' t ?..— .`'� "t..•y :,'?" -:-'2;;.‘1-.;;:...t i �.I II k I s.
_ �j
i
I
S t. _ a U 3'I��# �t -.r y ...P .t ::.
l a
_ 1 p c i 1 n3. y :;� = s ce•
J �. i it? d•-,,,, ,,,,-, ,,,_.--,. 1o�. ..iS� Z �3 ,.� -k � Ff 1&zr • i
• *) 4.r! '�. a�A1 1.
.1-".,:-.:', lL M A j pry a �:5! ,x.=,yy',_.„
i. p 1 7At1 .pC r4 q..• '''E- _R ..,a tip.. 1.
., , ,. ,,, ,._.„, w `
�, W ..� o s p-; LA o is„:;..„...1.... ,..,,,,,,,,,. ir._._ „...,:::,,,.:„:„,„:.:,:,., ...,,,,,,,:,.,:,,,,,,.....,,,.. .,.•
, .._ ,.. .,.
.,.-...,-. .r.-:.:.:,,,.„,..,,„,.:„,,, .
1 in 3 J s z• ;.. . .r a e V
'•_'• .; ', .fir s : ,,,,,a
H �.�✓r/!rdi� a•.r: iPs t �hpup� '1`I+q' ".
a•ter °Z 0-8 '/�/ : �& �
A F
ga .� u•
W p -:mo ., f— - ;x. .t:•� ` ;1 r _
. -�., 'iS' Q '!W. -7k8, J°a- m r a.' r ;jC.
.. ,ice i ¢ S'C'R • �`-' _i.
•�� 4 .y ‘,...'i. _��' �r nk r s+ a fi•. 4 'h
+
• r `i ..
'- v t ag IR f '1 nR °' �� Nl9by �r1 I
. <r° fly 4 G
---\ • . . • . - '- -...---------- ,,,,,....,-_, • k.' • "• , :;,„,,,,.. ..... *.,„„:„.;..,...._,....,..., , ... 'a} r 44 y ' BAH H i o .,- �. �s C* '"LE `3NI{HO1dW - ' II �" ' f 3NIlH31VW.' :..,,, . Z L£- � " _�._ F.... miimillin
I 0 LL 0
S-..ft r.101w.w.MM.r...wIw.W.P#A�4M
I I 0 I 1 I W I 0 I o I m I a
:uo�,°an°°'v"°'m° ., 1.»beM.� tea..,.•.........: , 0.. S31dVN-31V1dW31111iHOV38 S
,/ a..... ,.�°- '.mss,.:: .4p+�... Z iii!- ?m o Ti
gm ...: � M31A3a M33d 1MOd3b $'m `r
ti,, —r.' 'JNRIOLNOW H0V38 A1Nfi00 4311100 '
...o�,.��.fir..°:
'.— ft�■CU .. .,..°., ,.r,..,r.'•,� aw°awe�eww'xroa 7 1
Wirt SI 1121/01
Nom .,1
A1NS103 bornoo Q$ s ��
<-:,•, .. - - • . - ,1,1,C1:,:',",m.— -----
r ./�%
�� a � } � t..a; )• Hlt/I�f,
�Zi��'�1 � apr= r
•..�� , r � x } r 8 �, _ Ham-
. ' -b
¢ L. -.....,L. V W�'' 8..;:, { ` fir'- 1 W Z LL 4 • =F } : T m O O m J O U ii 8 1 < 1— O J WmJW U Z Z LL m m O O O Q C.:.1 . , , , -,r,-,•••,,,,,,,,,} e t i k t. °* '+ W J J J: r. r `� �arr .oa z. f. t„ j • Cn t '' I— I-0, r : aY _l y
•a F w..s U � m Z 2 2 2 W D.
3 4� r '4, OUQUQUOUj
;! . R ' �� auJU] H1hL, ', W._r �=yrz.sa. > e{ s f, i ,T, SG+� d 0 m m m; <r,ia',_ ! iY W 1 f0 M M. i 'i."'.'','.:>J.7 n 3 W I cc q p AC J�,, ,•., r �.. ,.' :O , '- } dLL NNNN W W Om
® I LL
w r
_ t Lu I IIW ��
� .� ' �= ' � . 8 1_ o w
R<r. • O � 1 U. w . iL,.tr.. 2 i-j1S4 ...-•:‘,.;.,•. --141C"'-• : ''. ,;---i*Vs,•-- '.- /pi _ -, , .!- --
1 SAS_ a
--t• 1, i CC ,,,,. "-....*" ` k.,- '.;.r..;,,-.: . .'-:%'-- ,., ir7 r. t. '''..i.,..
•
ter.. o !.�, f I ' U '
1 7 -' . s''••,,.,: -.—'„.--,..- 1.4 . t141) -; ‘:-14;1"*”.
�
y N
'/ELO a ,. ,•, , j
'ta N
•
/ Rese : ` ya s „• S er d
a
•
W Imo a, t ..
5��� ..,,.,...,„4,..,
• O L° 1 tea+ i,:r r ,,.46.-. .a.'.4 1.;-:,,,,14.1,,0!.. N
W< 1 '0',:3) a
g
Q �� 144
• gaA oi
n may,-g a a i. .. ..j..-1_,-.hr k ,► h a r J 1 e i., - Vi
11) 4., .. .
•��R e. .i . ,.
ms ,m - ,F-2:'..-:'•A i . ;vy t :: y y. .
I I o ' I a I 0 ,_. U m a .
1 I 0 I u. I w I o I U I In I <
siva consim 1VNIONO
.1/11001.3 UK Mr 1,11.1-01er. ...=.7..... .MOOM■11.10=:."•=10. 1119113ONVA-S311d0Ild 3.1.Yldri3J. ,
,7•••••"*-....-.-=-=•-......“- 11IA H0V39-Nousaa.1.33CONd •
- '- r1 Irm.....1•004,.....1•59“rwor...wren...mg '''' Z gg E ti ti
------------
-.....-........----,-- M31A321k133c1-12J0d321 .., g
•••0/a..WI INV*/001/rioln ilrI.Urre•ONIIMP
',MM.rIrr riorri.IA Porrra IOWA OAP arlArrIl ON1,1011N011 H3V38
,..r'" tr...*Prerr.00.1.1*0 trInWP.Irr.**11 AIN
10 -
3 3103 I.
Ij4 Hill I
M I
AMON .N1103 N311100 .....6
co a)
oo co
O 0
I
, ca
> >
Z z
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88)
o
I o
,_
o .
H
1 ; o
cl o
c? o
/*---N 7t
i- I-
LL U. 0
CV ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88)
,- o
,
i
i o
,_
o
(.1
: 0
c? o
o
-4-
< <
io co
co 0
fY cc
WW
< <
i
I I il
I
i
11
I /
I/ ›- >-
00
co ,r. -
csi N
.,.... ...
0
•• 0
+
N
z Z
• LLI LI
00 I
. I ›- 5-
I 0 0
I I /
I
I
/ 0 co _
co Oi
0
— ct,
•• 0
z Z
WW
cu
O 0 i >
0
= 0
_I
Z Z
< <
ILI LU
2 2
I I
w w _
I 1
I 1
I
II
11
1
1 _1 __I -
-J -I
• LT-
2 2
• 00
< <
• : LU _8+
CO CO
01 CO
e- 0
0 0
CNI 0.1., 0
e- I
I
i I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I ....1 -I -
-1 -J
2 2
0 0
< <
W W
CD 0
+
01 t2—:
'0- 8
\____ics, N
— . I— I-- —
O. O. -•
2 2
WW '
1- ILI E.
_I
_J -I-J <rX 1
IT LL
= = 0
O 00z
z < <
I
I 1
11 •
, co
-......-.. Ir.NrIr wwww■WWWWW......,•■■Ir,WWWWW -?..
•
. •- i CO I
1
I
I I/
I I
I II
I 0
co
+
co 0 Oa Oa
WZZO
0 0 0 I-
0 C7). C-7)
Z W UJ 01-
p 0 0 oal 0
co co co cc •
I 1 I
I
,-,- >7 8 E;
I I a
1 i 1
Z
W I I _ i —
— LC161-111j III 1 1 —
I
I e-N
I
1 wI I
I 2 1
w 1 I
I o
o • 1-
<
-/ I
I 0
i I- + a_ + •zr
m I co 1
0
0 1
I Co co
2
w I .
CNI , I— CD
/
11 0
W
0 I IX
fO
CL II
8 I
ru .1O 1Q. C ;1 W/
T1 'III/ 0
CV
)
CI-
4-I
a)
— ...Y
/ 1 •0 —.....
// 0 U
(/) ....., _j •• . / 0 0 (13
1-1-1 O.•co •
w Cr) T) 'i 1 + / + CL
CC •:1- -1.-- r‘ i •cr
U1 2 u) ± i
N 2 w I 03 = II - k cC N
LI/ 0 W =
co _1 11 ! N
co ••=. 1 T
W ...... 0 i : 1
w .- 1 W 0 w
a_ ,-- = cO >
- _a. ± '/ /----LW L- - 0
-
- _. 0 -
+
L1J I 1*. +V ILI 0. ± /
i •
C Cs1
-J
, , r D Lo I . /
it
1 . i I
0 .1 i 0 iii'. Ix fx , b o)
0_ I II 1 .. -
a. ,
,
• Q
co 1 / . 1
.4" T
/ . (.,
u b
cl 1 I I j
i: ci • i . CNI
0 Ce I 1 11 'I I 0 `..- II
1 , . O i r ij _
- , . . + , , , , , + ....1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° < di
(/) <
__I 0
< Ci)
(88 CIAVN)133d NI NOIIVA313 (88 ClAVN)133d NI NOLLVA313
..-- z < .
00
N F_-
-cE cc
O w
I >
1 I 0 I LL r Li, 1 o 1 u I m I
.15•4-Mg M... .14.104110,01.0,000.......
= 1 0 1 w T w I o I o I m I <
:3tra a3n99nrw01110 am
,q„m,10, u �.. •,w. 1118i13ONdA S311dOad31d1dW31 N II
1114 HOd39 N�JIS3a 1o3PO d @
,.�,..•.,...�,........ M3IA321 M33d .L Od321 ? IS.. -'m m m T
�w��'�.�� ONIa011NOW H�d39 A1NIlOQ 31110 L v
rot•c 1A 131drN ��, 99 y
V - -- 3Ntl9 30H939tloN'M 09K �{Q ) # 6 Imo.
.. ., ,. .. ._ .., KU. AINI1O3 a3111O0 .,� C 1i'>i i E $ l 1
7
Z co co
- 0 ;
Q Q
zz
U ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) M m
o r
1 N O 0 0 N 0 M O N 0 0 o O O w
t + + Q Q
vt Nr
I
j /) Fes- I- i i ��, it
—
I j 1 U U j II V 0 = O
I 1 Nt0 — I I OV "'- SJ
I 000 I I O � z
I I I I I W W
' I I ' 1 22
I / } } o I }} o
~ ~ c
1 I I
1 6 N N
I I uz) w If I I W W
— I j 1 O i 0 0 W W —
J J t I I J J Q Q
< II I // _= l I = _
W 1.11 I I I W W j + J ...I 0C a
m m 0 i t 1 m m 0 J J Q
`moo i I C) o I U U
'I-
,- NJ � �� i Q = 2 Z
— I zww -J
II i i =pmm � —
I) I I I I
0_ ZZO
IIi I i I OC90I-
I ! °o i I 0 Zwwm
11 11
I
{ I/ I I `° � ocn °c 4)^
(I / I' I 1 Z Tii z/ w! I W : I -]
1 W"f'11 I F- I l\ 1 I J
W ) 1 I ` Q II j / i I
1- I I °o �M I i I I 0 O�
0
m ( ni. ljj / m FI I II I m Ln
I i I
W 1 1 o (' I �/ ( j a)
{- II 1 N
L.".. !{r
co I I/ LU I /I �_
ci_O ' .
V I O I` I // W
Ill O I� I / I ! O a. U I I / I o CO
W w J 1 I j , + -U) U _1 > 'i // + CL
OJ > I1I / I I m 0' > � iii
N W fn II I / W `- 'i I \ i f ( r
U 0: > = I� I I L W m 2 j
O II \I ` O I j a Y o I I \ m J O
W O W = \ /
1--0' U O I i/ i O a --- I j ,• i o
-I a- = -' f i . / N W • / I N
/ O
�r�l d I / �; j I o
i N
N ,/ I II p CV
0
N O O O N M O N O O O O O O Q W
N th U J
C0 Q
(88 aAVN)1333 NI NOI1VA 13 (88 DAVN)1333 NI NOLLVA313 F J
z < a,t--1
O0
EE m
Ow
_ >
I I 0 I w I w I 0 I 0 I m I <
S-9r w- .gewMY'\9MN,M...ow
I I 0 I 1.1. I tu I 0 I 0 I (0 I <
,31.3 coney l•NIOrNO asaro .....................
npusagNez ... mss a...Ali o Nowa ,. ..7....,.......r..••••■*.........r. 1119213CINVA'S311dOtld 31'111d111131
i InI.,•••■■••■■••,194,11.MIMINMIIIIMMITAM■•■■■••■
04••■••••■••■■•■•11.•••••••••■a.....1......0..... 11Id H3V39'NO1S3/3 133TOlid
Icll ..„,........,.......... ................,, '.‘" Z
....7......r....M.1.1*.*WO,P.....•
M31A333d'1H0d .1,666g
'4
1,74 .......::c..cc.....cc=7....,.........4
9NINO1INOVI 1-13V39 AlN1103 11311103,... Ne I LI
q ..............6...,,,,p us........p.mona.n.
NOVIMMIN.M11.Mille.9107.1.0M.P.MMI,WI KIM 11.631e1VN
g 4 eg guys..■*1.11•••••■••100/1.”11.....*opumwea ''''' i<P"' 11 i / i 1 1!
,-"c\ P ...—.......................—........
"Mi. MINO3ONNWINON'N OK
AlP6103 J311103
.......
C 0 CTi
CO CO
00
> >
< <
Z Z
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) in co
in co:
. 07
I a
e- 0 0
l- 0 0
0
N CO
Ce ct
E
0 UJ u j
1 ! ( +
.tr
< < i
I
li- LL ce
w
1 I
I
I,
I .
• I --->-.--.>-
I
00
I
1 coo 1-
I ,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I • —
0
: ftgl
U7 CO ‘-
Z Z
111 1.1.1
0 0
°Z
Z
<
I WI
1 1
1.1.1 111
—
CI
I I
II
t;
11
II /
1
i
1
I
I
/
1 -1 -1
-I -1
2 2
(...) (....)
< <
ill LLI
03 021
'E, 8
cosLcii o
o
+
o
—
1--
2 2
Lu IA --71
i— i-
_i
il it
= i 0
z < <
D LLI LU
_
11
I
i
/ 0 Ca C°
S466P
il I 0
I c::.II
+
co z Lu Lo
a o
■ . co co c., ct
, / . .. • — R8F., ‹
i I aWNNM
Z
i — Lij I I
I
0 I i
11.1'-'
1 L-LIJ 1 1 —
—
1- I 1
l- 11 1 0
0 ,24
2 :i
I I +
CD Lc,
w
0 I—
co i, ' .1.
w
01 L co
c.11, I -
o_
W 4-,
W
— (/)Lij uj Cl- g -Y
0 ' /
3
,g g,"- 0 U) 1,1 / 0
0 co
—9 co ....,
LIJ 2W > 11 ‘:11
CC 1.... . • t
it > •. 1 I \
1 '
0 Ili ''''
I, T1T CO 1 1,12 I I
CL 11 cc 0 , i \,
i _.....
—
..1 i •/
01 /1
m ct / 11 b co
0
11 0
r N
C? N...
I I
rt f---' II 0 Lii c _
___ .
,
. . : i . + --I
0 0 0 0 0 00 < U j
N ,_ T-
CI N l Cl) 0
(/) <
J 0
< U)
(88 8 OA 13
VN) 3d NI NOLLVA313
■•••••••\ z < 0
0 0
N p
1 Fc cc
O L1J
2 >
I I 0 I IL I w I 0 I 0 I
.Int-OW 11..1 WINASWIONNINWAIIr 44
= I 0 I a I m I o I 0 I m I <
31Y0 OMANI IMMO
Mal a 32IOHS H1Vd-S311d011d 31V1dW31
m m c II
11I HOV39 NOIS30103POtld ,,,,, z rig Es,o
M31A37:1 1133d-1lIOd3a '°°m
„°1^ � DNIHO1INOWHOV39.LLNl0OM3r00 `� E
✓ roux.13uYN • . _ g °9
.0... �ep�°"_yam ..w,...�, 3NM0 30Ni3iNON'N NR / Il Q 1 g I
......,.,...'.�a.........�,.......w,�....... A1Nflo3 a31l1O3 ,,,,,� < IRI 5 I S �3 a
Z coco
D CI >
zz
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) M m
o ,-
r� 0 0 0 b o o �.
Q N O N ('7 O N 0 I N O 11Y11 it
1 ' f
II I I l 1 a I I 1 �-� + Q a Fc
I I 1 W re
H LL I I LL LL
Ij I 3-- 0 Ij I 3-- 0
II I Y- M — I I 0 0 ` J
1 co ui i I co v Z Z
I I I I N
I W W
I') I I I
I •• ••} 00 i •• 00
I I F_ I I I
N I I 11
II I i j W W I I W W
1 i I 0 0 1 j 1 0 0 W W —
I I _ I J J I I I J J Q Q
I LL LL I LL LL _11-
11 I U U ( I I U U w W
a II I I mm + it I I I 1 mm + � J <
a
1 01 0
' I N N I I 11 ' I N N 0 0 0 2
� III 1 iii zwwg _
•11 it cc z
I ' 1 I O O O 1-
I I 0 I I I o o
1 o I 1 ( o Z W W m
D 0
t i { I ( j 0 ( ' I I i ( o � o � fY ��∎
l i l i t I O X o o Q
I I ^I' Z W N N 2
I! i i — I i I 1 — I 1
_ F 1 !
'li ' I jl I i I 1
I I I
I"1y Ii I °o f I I ( 1 ! 0 1
o N
Q I1 U I ' r I 1
0 J 1 1 1 I 1 I I I
I' I 1 I 1 i II� I
o Iii i' w a � 1j i i I 0J
NI h
I I I O i �c
J >I , I 0 U
2 a O I 1 I v 1 U _ w LC) I If I
I U) 0 -I fl III I I m i
N i W U) > 'i I I i Cr d i o i j I N.
if U Cr > I I m 0 W i I I
2 Lit fn o r I � Cr 0O 1 ,
J i
fY ) i d > _ f
CO O �� I / I ( j ,tsi r ( I
O , 1 oo I L3 I oo —
W >'J
III I LL 13 I i N w ( T OIrI I N
0 j — I �i1
O OQN
LL
OD rt I 4 LL /I + CO
EL / 0_ I / I r I N
—� 1i I O 1 I. 1 �V II I I r- II
— 0 1 I I 0
+ + _0 W r _•0 O o o o 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 Q di
N N M N N C? U J
U) Q
JU
(88 a/\HN)133d NI NOl1VA313 (88 aAVN)133d NI NOI1VA313 F 0
m P"--■
zQ
of
Efr
ow
_ >
I 1 0 1 a 1 m 1 0 1 0 1 o 1 <
--.K.• rIIMIss .rwN...•...
UM.91.11
1 I o I a I w I o I 0 I m I <
MVO 030Q4i T0MO1tl0 ,,,,4L,,, - 3MOHS)IHVd-S31l Oad 31tl1dW31
aro _ 11Id HOV39-NOIS301O3r021d Z I.1
WAJAWMIN VA .,,. _ amm° a
_" �"� M3IA3212133d 1210d3a m wwww
-�� ONINO1INOW H3V39 A1Nf1OO 21311100,,, '2 6 V
Mil li'431dNN
% 3NU030Hi34NOH'NWYE Si g g� ag
/�C. ,.......,..,.�,......_...�.... ,r. AUNf1OO M3111O3 ,„..� C li E i 8 3 i i
0
> >
zz
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) M m
c
0 0 0 0 0 0
O- 0 i N C? O N O� O i N ci O W Ce a'Lij
er
I I ` \ I, 1 I 'LL LL` W
2
j UU I j I UU =0
I 0 (p co —
I ! C T I I <° �° Q Q
I I I I W W
\ .. 0 I I I .. 00 I I
1 _
I) H r I I I 1� 1� N 1 a.
fa
II 00 ( i It I 00 W W —
-1 -I — I 1 � � — 5 J I-
aa �
f
0 I o
LL LL
III < < 1 O I (r QQ
0 W W a
j I I I, i I i m m O
MO Ii I 1 I t m CO
Coo O J J Q
LL LL
I I N`—'N I N N aU z I za
'i ! ! c I II ! Omam �
I 1 I ! D Z Z p
Ij I
I I' II c�c� c� �
'! I 1 0 l I I 1 0 I-
0 C-/-)
1 I o
II ! r co I i I I. 000 m
I' I I I � o ��
' I I ICI I OWNN2
' I I 1 ! I I II 11 W I— C7 ,
�1I t ' I f fl 1 I —
-„,,,-.^..","....../......_I I W
III ---'';l i °o ( i gII( j If °O m cc) I I u1 g l y
m WI i W t 1.
F I
H j f O1 ttO
o f I I, I co ' j I __ co
0 1 I, - N I ,
WI I II WI DJ
I / a I j r
_Y W a o 1 , I ! L�O i I CD LI
I •( u, U ° I I ' i
Wi cC > > Ii I i
N U W > 2 ' 1 I i Ct X > _ ' j I ' N
U , I _L
cY m 0 II I I ' '-- I 2 W m 2 I 1
WO O W I1 i [ W o w 0 II i I
O �I l I I I m I I•— W > J + Y/ o W o I o —
_j __to • ,I ! N W a 2 I ( N
J I %I✓ J 2 to j • f
(f I I 1 LL I /I
m j �I 4 I j o m
Cl. j' ( j a I ! I N
t
CO I I II 1. I 3 �� ! II N
_ C , I'. I I 0 f I ' I I O 11
NO O O N M O N O O O N M 0
U J
U) Q
JU
„.......s, (88 OAVN)133d NI NOI±VA 13 (88 aAVN)133d NI NOI1VA 1 z m
Q
OF
o >
1 I 0 I a I w I 0 I 0 I m I <
el--M. 14111.MWiou_a__
= I 0 I u I w I 0 I U I m L
31VO 03nK11YNI06JO
321OHS H21tld-S311JOSd 31`d1dW31 e' co
u — 111d HOtl39-N01930 1331'021d ''W
VA Z §tmo
VA M31A321233d-12IOd321 .i-,m
m o
kr} 9NI21OLINON HOd39 AJNfOD 213IT1O3
V11 .m mx......w.........ir ma• DAM 30.23CN0N'N O OM
b
.66. A1Nf103213I1 0 3 C Iii Q e a i E i
z op co
■ > 0
Q Q
ZZ
1.3 ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) in m
r 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q N O O r N f7 O N O N O IL 0'
1 O+ O+ W H fu
I f-1 I i 1 �\ + Q Q
I I JI- 1 1 1 _j 1- m
_ I J W / J } 2 n
C7
1 i / U I j I O = 0
I, za II zN QQ
I 1 1 1 \I 2
M .. r 0 I .. O I I th
II i / 12 12 T N I T N I •
zz ! f zz I )
II I w w 11 1 { w w —
1 i 00 W
JJ T 1 1 / JJ — JI-
i LLLL I 1 I LLw ag -
I
/ 0 0 o • U U o w w
I ( Q Q O II I I Q Q 1 0 F H O
t ( I LU LU + t, 1 1 mm o JJce a
I
I{ ! / I mm { i i I mm I u LL
I 1 ; / o °o I I' i I 00 22a
II i
N N 1 / N N O D U Z
/—
1 i I i 1 I 1 O 00 m M
I I I I i I, i / 00`0001-
I i i I 0 i I 0 0 � � o
/ zww
co 11 co l i ! I l i i i / I f x 0 c0 co cc E. 0 ��
II I I I I 1 Z W N N 2
W '1 I (D1
1 i wll
Q I1I 1 1- I 1I i 1
11i I 1 51� i /.
I
/ 0 L 1 i ;
0
Lu I `°1- i 1 t m LU ' V
m N r I i
'1"N'I ;ii
Ia I/ W I °"
O l /
0- , 1 / a
1 1 / Y
II, I 0 i C I i I f O 0 as
I + > + a
U Ii Iii
r, • 1 I I 11 i I.
i I� 1 I I
I 1 I I I r
_ 1 { I I. —
I,t 0 i i t, 0
N
-1i I ( 1 0 I �r I
0 re�'1f I ! I ! ("II; 1 o
Q ? I i I Q_ i -i I N
00 it II ! i ' ( `lr Ii I I 11 N
I �.r 1 I { 1 { E �l 1; I I
1 Ii I O+ `, 1: I +O 1 —
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q W
N N M N N C? U _
(/) Q
0
(88 GAVN)132d NI NOI1VA313 (88 QAVN)133d NI NOI1VA313
Qcn
0 Z Q ct
0 F
OW
2 >
I I 0 I u I w I 0 I U I m I G
—1—OO M. ...II ft.
I I 0 I LL I W I 0 I 0 I M I .1
:21.20 WISP 12/1101110 21.2 .2.222,...2.....2.2222
1.1..1311110 WRI Miet-.110.417 011.1, .f.r=••■••■r.64.118111:10...... 32JOHS) Yd-S31140214 311f1dP13.L
1.1....10......11001.0.■.11.,........... in
1114 HOV313-NOIS1:1
3103r0214
.224242422.22422..422.4.4...t.....22.2.2422 ''''' Z
.2.424.42.2s=rot...22..22.2 2....r.,..=.7.
....r.•.....r....:z.......................
.............. M31A333c-1t04311 . 6 6 6 7
'4
im/.../.••••■■■■=9...111........q.P.....111.•• ON1210.1.1NOVI HOV39 uNnoo 21311103
.0.4.411.■•••■41■••■■•••■■•••■••••■•■•••■Plamee
Mr m.o..1611./.1 11114,18.4.01St NO 1.4010....9.41
r
,...
ualmia.MPhaulaanallawls II N..11.0=1.1MY mi
*MN MIIM..1.11./.•••■■••••■■11ameee414.11....1. NANO 90111111211014 It 002Z < triti
11111111
22202 AINnoo 213M00 ..—
co co
00 co
00
> >
< <
Z Z
1),
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88)
01 q
o o o
,- o o o o o o
• . c.1 T 0 cv — o ,-
I I 1
1. .
, I o
+ . o
I CI. UJ ui
I— 1—
i 11
I i II
[
1
.
il
1,,
I
; z • T
— ,
0,
•• 0
' +
/I ° 11" ' (NJ
\
1
I (7)(7) I
,
LLI 111 ;
00 '
1,1,
11
ii
:'
:
il
1,
I'
,
11 /
//
I
I
t
\
4 (Ni 1
o
— " °
I g,-,
Z5 Z5 1
z z i
LII 111 1
00 1 =0
a_ -J
Z Z
< <
LI/ 01
M 2
i 1
1 I
UJ U1 rl
I .
. .
li
ii
[
1 /
..---1/I
-.I J 1
LT.LT 1
1= 1
00 1
< < 1 0
LU LU +
CO CO 1 0
CD 0 ;
!
11
,
.,
,
, I
i
1
II
III
1
I :
-J 1
I I
0 L)
< < , (=,
ILI uul -+- +
1:0 03 1 o
C; 8
C\I C\L" ;
-;- I- I- —
cL cL
:E M
Ul LU 0
F- F- 0
-J -I Ct V
J J <
IT r1.-
2 2 0
C)
,
,
, )
I If
,
I
I W z z 0
C)
CD 0 0 I-
. i o I: 1 i
0 (7 iT) I-
' C) Z LU LU 09
•
: +
1 cO
/
I c0 p. 0 a 0 0
1: V c I
. p i I U) 0 CO ce
.=.. 0 L-. ....,
; \ . :
, I
,-,r - LuNN .
-._..,i z
I ,
1 ,--,
, II T LL.1 d 1 I --,-; Ul I I
I—11 1 ,T, ! i I
...... , !1 1 -
_ . UJ I, ,
1 ,
, ,:=, o
, .
4 + .1—!:!-- -I , + Li)
, UJ 11
:/ 1 co (so 11 1 , uo
i 1
0 11 71-
;
CU
0 ; V
„
OD
, 1 ;
11 -I- 0-II ;/ 7.` CL
I
w II / I ■ ".wev"..".""/...,0 1 1
/ ; i -I, I;
. (i):; i: , :
. a)
— . o ; i : .
. , •
_1 , co L7 >ti / .
,......."...".."."...,,,,, . o L.L., EL "--I. I / ; 0
+ 0L
-I r
. ; +I'
2 . I l W co ' H i i
H /
/
: 5
I/
. ,
: ; I
- ,
—
,
H ' co —
: .7. ,,, —CL M I- C)
LU ! 1./
' ,
, CNI ''''' M Lo
NI
0__J
I I U...
,
li)
CO Et : , ft • ■
--
,
0 - : /, I II 0
In
; ; „:111 t• . Cg
I ; I:9 ,-• II
W : .
; .....*i; ;
0
• i : 0 (Y
, r , :
.
, c) . c) iii , _
— --- , + . 1
+ _I
o o o o o o 0 o o o o o o ° < CU
CV .s- ‘...
Cil 0") C\I ,- ,-
Cii CO
(0 <
/".".•s, (99 DAVN).133d NI NOLLVA313 (89 DAVN)_L32A NI NOLLVA312
z ‹c
0 L.)
F2 ct
o Li.,
= >
1 I 0 I u I w I 0 I 0 I O I
et-O.It 41 22221140221112•21 MIPPIIMm.P.n.s en.1141~411...II WM
ma.....1
I I 0 I IL I m I 0 I 0 I m 1 <
31Y003fW4llYNIDMO ���,�,L eM,- 3210HS)4 Vd-S311d021d 31tl1dVI31
w VA 11Id HOV39-NOIS30103r021d Z IS 1e" `0 0 o
"""" M3IA3M N33d-1210d3LI .14/A226
4.“.. -...^ • ONI iO1INO'I H3V39 A1Nl0O M311100 Y
1I .."°:.+.:"�.”:"i.r:�i=:�..;ea..ry rem ii'c3urx . ''. 1 0 °?
3Nno 3oNC3cnoN'x coot \ r I
r' !'. ." »„om A1Nf10O21311103 ,.�.., li i $ l S l �-
Z co co
1 0 0
D
Z Z
j ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) in m
33 o
c.= 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sg
Q N 0 0 N C? O N 0 0 I N f7 O° W Ct W
1 ( I 1 1 1 r H re
I I- F 1 I / LL LL 11 to N L ! I N O) —1 0 1 I N M
III 1 N N I N W W■
II II I
1tff'1F i N I r LIE r I!j I' I I I j(
I! I j Q Q cp (� I � I < < I oo I— I— 0
a 11.1 + c' WW + JJ � a
I 0000 o I I mm o JJQ
( I 1 I M (O f II I r c0 (.0 LLLL �
�3 I / �� I I I \N J 0 0 0 Z
1 II ! f\ i Dww � —
I I 1 I W Z O
II II I i / 0 0 0 I-
i 1 ( °0 'I i i °o zww �
m 1 II j I ( o �j ' i °° uF-i c00 m
�l I i j 11.1 II I X000Q ��
I I I I r I I Z W N N =
1- ' r 1 ( I ! ( r i wi
II ! I ( m '� 1 /r W I I
� I, ! i W ! ! 11 J I
w ■1 m I I 1
� i I' o olli It o
1 0 .1 I of I l
CO Ln
m I Vlj 1 ! i wlj I/ ; c
0' f
N—a II I I O I' 0)
W d O , I� - 0 II i as
O (' /, ^^n^^^tin^^> / Cl.
CO C� u > ' / w w= � j / 1 a
- U Z I / ( II O0 I / i I 0
w L j / 0 Ti 0 J l i / o U
� W m 2 4i / •::I-----j- I—W g- 41 / 0 CO
W O W 11 / I i 0 IY > ! I c
00 J 1;
, I i w co i
o
a = ' ' i fn > II 1 1 , i
0 in If 'I I W > OJ I / 1
I , i /r M j
"i r f o D Lo , / o —
0
CNI LL I . 1 . 1 I L_ . I;
l I i I,
CD C I } 1 1 ( I �• ,> i i I b m
CL ! I f I I 1 a- t' N
� I IIi I /' I' i j II
f 1 r1 I ' ) I { N
I ' (IL 0 I , ' _
i 'i ' i w + I I J
0 o 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° < w
N N M N N c'ai 0 J
03 Q
J 0
(88 C AVN)1333 NI NOIIVA313 (88 CIAVN)133d NI NOLLVA313 z �/�
Q
N H
OW
2 >
I I 0 I a 1 m I 0 I 0 I m I <
_N--1t ftmMMN__•_3r.
: I 0 I ti. I M I 0 I 0 I m I
:a VIC mast IVNI01/10 -
h0.1•101130 ar. '''''"....."''''''''' 0..===••••• ■••= =:::= 3HOHS AlVd•9311A0Hd 31V1c1613i ill i gr.
11(i H0V39-N91330.1.03r09d A‘•
•----••••--.-------••-- -- Z Ef:i ti
..:.....-....:,-..=-...--=-7.0 M3IA39 933c1-.LHOd39 g 4 6 6 6 S
0.•mi.*al mu...on..I.,v..,ymayna.a.•poops 4....10 ;.- ,
NOtea IMOI..11.wrea■I.•1.1...MTN....MP../I 9N190.1.1NOIN HOV39 A.114003 9311100_.
..„,„,,,,,,,....„„•,,„„„......„.,,.,„,..,„„,..,„,... u
''. *WM X. MUM.ma same.1 91.1..I.M.1 0 Le711•111
3/.0 30119311k1011'N Ong
101.1014 9 <
..u.mnoo 311103 Illiiiii
-•^••
co co
c0 co
CO 0
(
> >
< <
Z Z
•
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88)
in c.o.
--
ct cc
. w w
I I; i
.4.
f"--■ ,- i- i_
< < Pc
I i 1
?
I I
11
ii /
II
11(1‘
I
/
I
I
i LL LL ......
›- >-
CD 0
LO 0)
Csi OS
CT)cn •-
z z
LLI LU
0 0 1 >
0
= 0
J- -I
Z Z
< <
Ill LIJ
2 2
I I
i 1
co
1 I
11
il
c
11
II
II g
I
—I -/
LT it
=x
< < 0
UJ LU +
-
03 co o
cn co
o o
c.....11.9......,- • 1- i-
<
2 2 2
w w =1
1-- I- a
I -J
it Y.
2 2 0
Z < < <
D UJ LLI -.
11 0 CO 03 2
:
11 crzzo
0 0 0
I o
I
o
z W W 2
•
i +
co i: 0 0 0 0
i Ci) CO el ct
11 I
i
Z
I i
1 LC1-61 II 1 _
•— 1 Ill I I
-J
-",1 i
......ll
i
I-11.1 i 0
o A
1 1 I + Ln
II i i •
0 2 II J1 1-
wH V a)
I- 1
A — ba
CD 1 CO
Ct.
0 1
Ell i / I .I-.
/ a)
_
LU
/
-p- 0_ I 0
o
/
7: co
UJ aR . --I / —
CL
W 0 (1) 1 ..4-
CO 0 J > /
LU m L0 r. d I
h C[ W > I.,, 1 i I
0 Lu •,- ••••• \ •
•L
•• N- , -T-
2 I 03 M \
LT1 2:5 LEIJ F2 I, i ‘)
CO -I 1.I (
— CC Cf) 0 ! ( i
o —
,___
a) 0- — N
- 0_ ± ll 1, i I(/ I
-
[17 D in
0 IP.
, •
b o
_..
• o
J I CI
II b
in r. N
4. 11
— / I 0
0
Ed ' —
0
0 0
U) <
j0
< CO
(98 aAVN)1.33d NI NOLLVA313
,..---•••\ 1--
z < 0
0 L.)
N p
1 E 2 c e
ow
= >
• I I 0 I u I w I 0 I () 1 ED I <
---. -
.1.1•14010111011Valt 7 allr.n
I I 0 I a F w 1 0 I u I to F a
31Y0(HMV lYNIJWO 5
,p,d„®, .' ,...."*"". S3ldVN-S311dOtld 31Yldb131 •t;
1114 HOV39-NOIS301O3PONd -,,. Z a LL
I% oo
""":;� "';"w: M31A321 2133d-1210d321 14666
--‘^ ,--„ ONIaOLINOW HOV39 A1NnOO$3111O3,,p V
t01rt1134NON'N y¢ I e Q
rr� 3Ntl0 30NY3ttlON'N NW IIj4
.3.01 AJNno0 a3n1O3 „, C N>: I ! I
Z CO CO
—c CO CO
0
z z
j ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) M m
N O O O N M o N O O O� N M O W cC ill
I. f'-1 v ¢ Q
1 ( LLLL 1 1 I LLLL W
I U U I I 0 0O o
I I I I Cl. — 1 I Cq m Z Z
/ ISM I I 1 tON W W
I I 1 I O g 2 m I III r : N I N
Z Z
II I
I Z Z s— 1 co c7)
— i 1 0 0 j
I 0 0 w W —
I -1J T I ! i -J -I gg �
m � LI U 0- 0-
.j 00 o I II I I UU ww
l I Q Q o I I j w W o • ~ H D a
a I I m m o I m m'`" o J J Q
1 1 ( I M O j 1 I M O w LL
I I I I
II � �NNI I I 11
H �"J^ Z < << —
II ^I j j 0 0 0
I 0 F I i 1 °o Z W W m
III i " JII � � 000
ll � 11 grl, r I I O � � n
I �I 1I HI I OwNN =
Z IIwII I it rt O1 I I C9 l i
5 II 0 11 I`` to u! W 11
I w� i ' cm �� � ool' i i C X00 00
CO III r I Co W—U N 1' i I I m `f1
I F N( I I U CC II I r
E I 2 w m 2 = 1 I I I]0
CO aal' I I _ w a ct 01O I 1 I i to
- D O i 1 W O W j d
— W cj N I i � ( 0' cn 0 I I G�1
cc > I I I a J , I / I I U
W I! I 1
—� d � �j— /
I j I f d
LU 0 f li /
m
r, ry N O 1 I 1 I r
W J I I 11 i I
a. 1=n 1 I / I L 1` I \
F 1 / . I/•_ II I/ —
)1,'1 o I r( O_l !I N -I -1 I N
II I I e 1 1
■LL II I U. I I , I
m r- I 11 C 13 j _ o m•
1 s 1
I a I
I co I I r IV ' ( I' i ± N
II b
N
A': 1 I
( 1 I I
— ft ' I (' �E I ••
I o III I o � :-I —
0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 J
co <
JU
p (88 aAvN)133A NI N0IJ.VA l3 (88 aAVN)133d NI NOIIVA 13 Z ¢ Wes■
0
N F
Ow
2 >
I I 0 I a I m I 0 I U I m I (
--M b_ wN'►✓YsmMFM..../\
i I 0 I a I w I o I 0 I m I e
31v0 03f WCI-roamO
..,..""....,,. S31dYN-3311A09d 31d1dW31
��� u 11IA H3V 9-NOIS30103r02Id z I�°te
t.."="-11====.:_ �.. Z `` mee
Y �°..�"..�=W" M3IA31:12133d-1.90d321
W = r, y „M^, „ ; ...., � _. 2 v
VOM Id 131dvN
I
' K
¢ r
i I�^ --^.^ .-�'..--^-. 3Wtl030NPtlON 303E
AlNnoD x311103 l l I
00
as
zz
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) �M
o
o
o �
0 0 0 0 0 0 z
I N O N O N o I N � o w re
O O W
I I r "
rTh 71
I LL LL > Wm
I I UU ! UU -O
I
il N • I I I Ol0 QQ
• 0
ti W W
1 � �
1 I- t- N I I I ~ STN p
II r zz 1 1 zz
j1 I WW II1 / WW
I I I 00 I pp ww -
J J — J J — I- F"
( \ J J I I ( J_ J J J F
■
I I LL it LL LL O a
/ _ _ _ _ • -
1I 1 ww ° 11 j j ww °
Li.' e
I II m CO o I I I 1 CO m rt o J J Q
I! I I Mo rim LLLL �
! I 1 i � �NJ pUUZ
I! _ ! I I ! ! 0wwg
! O m m g
I mezzo
I I' 1 c ! o 0" ( I-
II
I 1 0 f1 f I j o Z W W m
i �1 I II 1 co F- ppp N
I} I I j i I I co o
1 Icoir
1 I / o W N N =
I 1 — , ! I WI I
1 W 1 I W I f
- wI I � , I j/ JI I -
cc If / o ! cc I II ! o0 131
w 'I ; j O I I
IL ( l / ( 0 I
I 0 ( / 0 U
N , i I f\ ! 0 I j I L (a OA
Cl) W W I1 I co a 0 1 . I I CL
LL O ' ! I! F- w 0 0 1 I f I 41
W V _1 J j l 1/ w O W ( I % 0
U C.
w�vn2.- > , o _V w > >_ ,i ( �/ o d
w 7 `• ! I / I ! v 2 w m = = / v
W m S J- II I // I ( ty d ix o II I I
', w O w n l / m O W ! 1 r.
W > 0( ` I / I I ( LL � o I ! I
/
o
111 ' I 1 i N W ! /!I ! N
ll_ �i 'j l I I I r HI'I
m 1 J�I I / I m d i \ I j I I � I N
u b
j I! f I I O I i _ N
I j �
LI7 I i e
I j
- � . Lj I ! 0 � � III ( . Io w -
I + I •I I I o+ J
•O o O O O O O o O O O N 0 O V Lij
N N M N 0 Q
J 0
�� (88 4AYN)1333 NI NOIiVA313 (88 4AVN)1333 NI NOLLVA313 Z
Oo
iY w
Ow
_ >
1 I 0 I a I w I 0 I 0 I m I 4
I I 0 I a I w I o I o I m [ -<
31Y0 oanserwmoMO vr'"""".w-.. m• S3ldVN S31Id02d 31V1dW31 fi„ ,,0, ,,,, 6•0716•0713.1.1..a o,«., 4107• : = N t,.
■4 111A H3V39-N91S33133POMd z �:{ LL LL LL
L:A ig5 S. c
h� w '. M3IA321 M33d-121Od32! I'm m m -4
Li 7....":"..."...","”"„,mow �;^T� 9NRIO1INOW H3V39 ALNnOO)13111O3 v
r ■J ••. rolrt 1J 13lavN I- °I
_.. Ntl0 30NfON 0011Z wn�.r rwvh.w.w..w�.ww
..,,,., AINf100 H 3 1 1 1 0 3 „e b Ci i t E i i g P”'
z co co
co co
1 ❑ ❑
> >
Z Z
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) in m
c 0 0 0
. 0 I o O Cil c? lQ N 0 N O 0 O
Z
O O W W ff l j v re
c----1 r Q Q w\ LL LL i I W W
a UU I UU - O
rs,r — orn —
I I\ � o I ad ad QQ
W Ill
I I I I 22
I 0I 00 I j 0
I ! I I- f II i
l Ln fn (A lA
! I Z Z ! )
I WW ICI Z Z wW
I j I 0 11 i \ ❑ L] — FIW- —
1 J J — I I / J J J F-
t I I LL LL \ LLLL� 0- CL
2 2 2 2
I QQ 00 • II I QQ 0 I- F- ❑
I W W- + � 1 ' W W- t J JQ' p
I I ( 1 CO m O (I I / m CO O J J Q
I c7 CO f I / CO O LL I
!i 1' ! I I N N J I N J N ❑ U U Z I o l I — I — m m g
—
�{' i °O 'I 1 I oo zwwm
m j ~ I) i I I co i Ij I F ❑ oo a
i _JII ! 1 i Co0< ��
W I 11 I I I ❑ W N N 2
- Ii WI ,
1— I I I gI
�II
- I I i 11
, o ID d I / ° �I / I i Oi I o a Ij I I I w `> \ a
Ce o 0 I \ I co j
_
d 4-,a \ /
W O w = 1 \ ( /
1 / Y 03 I I �WW I oa o I�_12 O j o CO
� _ U J ; I / cl-
10. w >I /
I i
n I I I✓. U W 'j I / I I S.
/V 1 — W O w II i \\
� II + E CC O 1
! W J ! I ; —
I II I I oo a i 00
J ! �} I' ! N J ❑1O /// I i N LL
o I ! j o .y/
m Et '��/j m b d f il I
I ( n- i I I °CV k'1II u
b
I
il 0 M "' I` 0 I' + O O 0 J
NO O O N 00 N O
(7 N (+ 0 J
CO a
JU
(88 aA N)133d NI NOIIVA313 (88 aAVN)1333 NI NOIIVA313 ~ o,^
Q
0
N H
E
OW
2 >
I I 0 I L. I w I 0 I 0 I m I a
.emu-.r•.. .n..I6rw..M.00.�.w
I I n I LL I m I 0 I 0 I m I Q _
3101003!1441 101100910 ,,,wy.'. ======; �°= S31dVN-S31IdOtld 31V10131
�
in` 11Id H3V39-NDIS30103ro Id d a°
MO ...,. Z Is1' N
""'�.... M3IA3 I N33d-laOd39 i 6 co CO
mow^ ^4• ONI I011NOW HOV39 AINf00 21311100 ` V
_ rows v'431d. �� yy i
3nroa 4olw3suo.1'x aooz C f I tl
�� '"""""'^`°"""'M•^"°^° a,,. AJN110O11311103 „� 11 l a 5 1<
co co 1
co co
0 0
' Q Q
Z Z
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) co el o
co
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o
N r 0 O ,
0 N M O N O 1 N O W e Lio o U 1 1 I-
LL LL 1 1 w IL W
W I I
5: >- I 5-- 51- LO
I co
UU i UU = 0
CO,eC
w
t0 T
I-- j N� cq — I � h ZZ I
Z I f N I I W W
p I o � � ro
0 H
} 0
co ITN I 1= N
i
W j 5 I U
0• • ( I W W I I W W
Z I 1 j p p T 1 p 0 F H _
L11 i_f n I I J J I
-if! J_ g Q
I j LL IL I i u— as
C� J � 1 1 00 1 00 ww -�
o QQ o0 1_ 1._
_< 0 1, I I ww _ + I I ww + JJd' a
I- I- 1 I I / CO m 0 ( CO CO 0 J J Q
0 I- ( M i M U LL
WO (O I o
� o J UUZ Z I I J— � pB
D W W cc
g = II
I 1 , I pmm2
I j I I I I I pC9C9�
I I 1 1 0 I I 00 Zwwp
1 + m
l I I I 0 N m i to
I I X o
I I ; 1 I Z W N N 2
I .��I j I _ I i W I 1
W I I I I U I i
— I) I 1
1 I I i l —
I I a ,l i I I rrv\ I-v 1 ,
C I.1 (j j1 i 0 1 I a I I l /I o e-i
I F- Ij I II <t I 11 I l' {{ o lD
0 o i H j / I
N , /I � H /
I w l I i — c0� I I / a
F — 1 / '1= I I I +,
c4 LL1 1 I / W u1 I i _.
— O > �i1 / I o U O 1 V i o v
N J
W Q 11 I + r-W— U)-> I \ { o+ co
O tr > 1 V i iY > I i \
0 2 w m = I I \\ 2 W m ± l) j i ! I
N CC 0- ft o I \ ; Q a W o I
W O W I W O W I
03 J
jTi>Q CC o y
w• > w > J ,/
- I { ,: 1 / 4 00 o ,I,,�,/ I 00 -
-I i ,,1yy II N -J I i N
LL { /I LL i \1
a { I/ 1 0- (/ I I i N
cll O
1 co I I I N
r j 1 00 iLLi
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U J
N N M N N M 0 Q
_J C.)
/.� (88 OA N)133d NI NOI1VA 12 (88 QAVN) La d NI NOIIVA l3 z ¢ m
Np
R 0_
Ow
I >
I I 0 I LL 1 w I 0 1 0 I to I a
.�..-Of r A ___......M.M__
s I 0 I LL I w 1 o I 0 I m I <
31.0 03088111/7401114
,°,�, .< 1°N,...%113 WNW S31dVN•S3114021d 31V1d1131
111d HOV39•NDIS30133rodd ill
M3IA321 N33d•121Od321 ,$-'.° `4
-° 9NI IO1INOW HOV39 uNnOO N311100 I 1
""':. t,:"' .a I
MK V Y3ld.N N
3N40 30N838UON II KW Q
Z co 0o
1 00
D QQ
zz
j ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) m
IS O O o O o o �:.
Q N O 1 N C7 p N O+ 0 - N O W IX
____J I n-:::. H o.
I z o I I Q Q
I 22
O O I
I 1
CT)CT) I I I
I
—
0 0 i 1 0 0 w W
I -1 I -1 -1 J <� � t LLU F-
0 0 O I I � 0 0 O w w
QQ o I QQ o I- 1- 0
a I- I W W + W W + J J w a
I ( I mm o I I 1 CO CO 0 JJQ
I CO c° II I I CO(0 E L
I N N ( 1 ! N N 0 0 0 Z
OJT I i -- Dwwg —
r 1 1 p m m
1 ( i 1 Wzz0
I I I I I 0 CD CD 1-
I 0 �' I I oo ZwwO
1 w w II I +m ❑ 0 CI m
to I) I 1 Q 1 QXoo< �\
II f d Ii I Z
W N N =
! _ W i 1 _ W ( I I
1 1 I 7 1 1 ■1 W 1 i
— L E o f i I/ 2 I
fr o
- 1 1 0° I I /I o0 N
2 1/H I II I �° 1 O ! // 1 c° d
o ( I / co I r/ 41
I / > ' I I _ C
CO
/ S I 1 CL
W
o l / it I W
-
{ Y U
0 I' I // { oo \II i \I ( oo co
! I r
N I- I \ \//I
Ii ' f 1 i II %
'' i r I i I i
i I - ;
i f I ` i , vi -
-
1 %� i oo f r�'i I i °o
W i )/ + W 1 ) I 1 +
t'-� i 1
1 ' i
m e ( l i _ `/� I { a m
LL LL d �_L i! I i } i I o
N
CO / I I 1 I !! o
7 // 1 1 I 7 i 1 i I N
` `- II
~ 1 ( ( 0 oo J . —
N O 0 O N M O N O O O N o O U J
(0 Q
-I 0
(88 aAvN)132d NI NOLLVA313 (89 GAYN)133d NI NOLLVA313 Q F... m/-■
zQ
Oo
Ow
_ >
I I 0 I LL I w 1 0 1 0 1 m I <
as-w tit .1,111~w117MN..114r
I I 0 I a I w I 0 I 0 I m I <
31 °°"1lv"° ° yaw b° OM.. W a�„O S31dVN-S311408d 31V1d1131
1111 H3V38-N91S30133f 02Jd VI
Z
M31A32 2133d-.1.210d38 'i'°m o
� 08120118On HOV38 A1Nl0O 8311100 E
V
.nvwr.�r�hr..r.rw^�. �� 3Ntl430N434tld1'N OOK yy Q
A1N003 21311103 „�„ ii 3
co oo
0 0
•
as
zz
I.
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) co �0o
0 0 0 0 0 0 07
N O0 O i N O N 0O O i N M O w
0 0
H
g H
r,I I ► v a Q Q
I I J LL I I I W I I J } _ILL
LLU I I I I I co
rx
I
O W o 0 I 1 1 I I I I o N Z Z Z co
W W I 1 I o N Z Z Z
w w 2 2 n
0 w W O 0 I I — —
i W N i_O p¢1- F
U I-m
Z O
1- l I 1I I 11 I
II
r 1 1
I LL LL U U
w w °+
n f] O
+ D O O
N N I(I 1 I
II
III r I J LL LL
U U
ww °
03 03 O
+ (O
O O
N N W w �� � a J .<LL U
S = °
0 0 0 Z
Zwwg
—
z I I
I
^ If l i ' I
i I 00 o I I 1 /!I O 0 pmm
Mzzp
0001-
Z W W p
1- ° ° o m
w I I I i I I I X OO O ¢
a~ 1 r ^ I I / Z w N N 2
1 II w 11 / _ w I I
2 i �/ T I a I /
I
— U I, i a II1 ( I � ! I —
i O II i /1 I I 2 � i II
° Il /1 I I °o lI i °o fr,
N o II / I
W 1 / I I co 0 1i 1 / ! co
m I Il 1 J + I I r
O I' I• / I I I' 1 / W
aI 11 1 I W Ii 1 I 00
11 i 1 I o l i t — ri
I' I \ I > I' '•
1 ` 00 = i ( I o0 m
i+ in 11 /I i N r I I I ( j v a_
1 / I /
I
d
1 II 11 / i % ( 1
1 / ! 1 1
J ,./
r, I I N J I I N
ii ■ /1' I LL 1 I !
m 0 I I I 0 I I I II I o m
CL I r/� I; I 0_ ( / 1; I ! T N
, % 1ii I CO ) 1H IIN
i II i i I it II
ce
i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U J
CO ¢
JU
"^N (88 GAYN)133d NI NOLLVA313 (88 CAYN)1333 NI NOLLVA313 Z c m
00
ow
o >
I I 0 I n I w I o I 0 I m I <
--s'UM Nlli/601NN hM.N4w
i I 0 I LL I m I 0 I 0 I CO I Q
3ir0 031111211r110410 ..�,. vn.wa S31dVN-S31IdO21d31V1dVI31
•. 111d H3V38-NDIS301n road z 1�"°
°;+=.. .:�"..' `+= M3IA321 2133d-121Od321 _ m
•^=��∎• •• DN121O1INOW HOV3B A1NfO0 21311100 u
.w M°OM.4O.004.*w MtK V'L31d. II m
.�nvhM w�wrh.rh+r�r�e.r
MVO 3OH 3GtlOM lI MK 1 [ I .I
A1NnO0 U3111O3 „� i
D c. 1.�
Z co co
D
,- < <
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) co eo m
xj o
Q N O
0 N M 0 0 O O N M O W a' E
I I u L
0
I I
a
} I
U U I UU
SJ
er a ^ W _
0 0 Z H I e- N W W
✓ 11 o O 1 .. o° i I
i N ^� I 1 j I ET) Jn `- w 1 ijj (7)I I 1 00 0 I 00 W W
_ H I-
1 J_ J ti W I I ; J J Y J J
1 LLw Z _ 1 I LL IL CL CL -
I ¢ Q - 2 III 1 I 0.0 o Ww0
Q I F I I mm O HO '{ 1 I J CO CO 0 -I -I
I MCC) U1- ! Ii 1 I coo U.. 0
/ N N CO CO '( I I N N O (� U Z
I ��_ z °� Iii I ��_ Zwwg —
I ¢
I II- = , I OmmO
I I o �f i I o 0WWo
O I It I % ii co Ii co C] C] 0 0
l 1 / I + r1'i i I // I I + w °oow ��
�I' I I � WIiI / I ZwNN =
I ,I 1- ii / I w1 I I , -j
w' / - g ' / T O I I
¢ Ij { i co Iii / I I X. I
n. w i
W I lI I { i ° I I /I tt I o d'
to co I /
NI I i I wI i I CD
I p l I { CO
Cl. I L 1=—J II 1 \ a
F• 0 t I ,\ w•a > If �\ I ( w
H {
w 2 � = I Ii v ! U w 1 I! s
U W > `- Ij I /I ; 2 w m = I, I /1
n CC 0- ir o /
n W a ce o I ,9 1 m w — ; j / r
i
W I w > OJ �I i
i
O I I z t I d % In
0
° —
J 1 V. N J / I ! N
J (o I i m
b
a. < 'II I I -�- a ' r °
O) ` j 0 i — II I i II, o
j ' 11 i � o N
I ! I o W I ! / II I i o w II
3 t ! + i • ■ + -J
0 0 0 0 0 O ° 0 0 0 0 O O ° ¢ W
N r r N M N
N C? U� J
J0
(88 CAYN)133d NI NOIIVA313 (88 aAVN)133d NI NOLLVA313 1¢— u)
z ¢ ®n
0
N p
OW
2 >
I I 0 I LL I w I o 7 0 I m I
Su-r It r1111•hr01140 w.1r.W
I I 0 I LI. I Ly I 0 I LL I co I <
,31V0 a3nest TIMM. air, -....................*
NCWAIZOIC "."'''''' 1., Tr 7"'...7•71...* 331dVN-3311d021d 31V1d1131
k...!
11Id HOV39-NDIS3Clio3road
.-----..---- — Z iii;z'' '
.joom
M31A321933c1-190d321 „., ,§
.4=-1-,----,•.“4=-7,7,="---g ON190.1.94014 HOV39 AIN903 9311103_ "4
---......--.------
....17,7=7*....- .7==== MAIO 3041.1iNCNI'M MK < Of ii 1:
..0.01 .u.Nnoo 93MOO Hiisg .:
CO 00
13 CI
>C- <>63
Z Z
I i,
ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) ELEVATION IN FEET(NAVD 88) en co
cr) co.
6 7
o o o o 0 0
o o ,..
-4 cv 7 o (il C? o cl c? 0 CC ec
o o Ul u j
1
I-
LL I-
LL LL E
= 0
..1... -1
I CO
IY
ie W
1-
Z
1-
0
Z
CO
W
, 0
I I
1
1
l'
I
1 i
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
N CO
N N
0
-Ct1
C7) C7) '
Z Z
LU LU
11.1
Z
0
z
cn
0
a
1— 1
I
i
co cn —
ri vi
01
c>
cti
z z
LU Lil
CI C) Z Z
< <
U.1 uJ
2
I
I
LLI LU c.)
—
I iii I-
2 —
z
CD =I
:-.1 2
< 0 '
15 r
1 w 0
1 cp CO
Z C)
< W
1 < 1
1
II
1;
II
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
x=
c..) 0 o
< a 0
ui Lu +
co m 0
c.,) (r)
,— o
• 0
CQ.ILVJ _l•-•• Z co
2 —
Z .
0=I
, ..71 2
' ' < 0
1- F-
L) I-
1 LLI 0
U) CO
Z 0
< Cr
W < i
1
I
1
I
I I
II
-J -I
LI E
= i
0 c.) 0
< < 0
LU W +
CO c0 o
c,")co
▪ o
o
C‘...11./NI .......-• 1- 1-
< <
tit• Lu —i
Er. it
m x 0
0 0 0 Z
z < <
D UJ W -1 -
I I- I ii I I- 2 / O m
I I II t:Kzzo
0 0 0 I-
I 0 1 0
o __Y"'\. / 0 z UJ UJ 0
I
9111 I +
co LT( Y'
//
I- +
co i= 000C° 0
(J) CD c0 ct
,-,1• >7 8 csiE) a
1 li I i z
/ / LciDj 1 1
1 — Lu —
LLJ 1— r/
1— i ill I I —
/ co / -1
0 1 o 1
1 / o
i ail / .
. cs, 1 . J.,
1 .
+ .., + ,$)
w ,.
0_ 1 I . 0_
0 1
k CD
1-
0
Oh ! I -' I \
F-• -I t o cf) a)
- " \ OLO
- C LTJ > ■ I — co
\ LU a. 7 I CI.
T-- ct Z
I— 0 I
Co 0 J LO
LL1 2 u) in . 1 /7 CU
CC lij 2 (I) i ,/
0 o
—..1-
o
—2 Lu-co•± I: //‘ +
LLI 0 w T- H / Lii 0 W -7- ' •i
" 1 Ill D Lo
o .
T---,...........": , I /.
' / 1 o
0
_T. +
w •
+
N I -41111111 II ! CNI
IT_ ij I'11 I Er_ /, 'I
0 il I 0 1 , 1
--'1
_/ 11 o
to ct I' . CC b
i _
CL i
III —
(NI
1Z. 1 /1 I CN ii b
Is:" ,1 . N
1
1
CC 1 11 o CC ,
1 1 o
— I .
+ 1 ,
• I 1
o o o o o 00 0 o o o o 00
N ..- ,- Cil C.? N %- a- Cil C?
(I) <
-1 0
< CO
„......, (88 aAVN)133A NI NOLLVA313 (88 CIAVN).133d NI NOLLVA313
z < .
0 0
N p
1 E ce
0 U.1
2 >
I I 0 I LL I W I 0 I 0 I 0) I <
..ou-as x m WareduvwV.Ovr ow
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
APPENDIX B—COMPARATIVE VOLUMETRIC SUMMARY TABLE
•
21
Packet Page-466-
1/22/2013 Item 11.A.
2013 Project-Comparative Volumetric Summary
Design Volumes
Effective Taper Effective
R-Monument Distance's' Matrix° Length Distance1' Atkins Volume°I Difference
(FT) (CY/FT) (CY) (FT) (FT) (CY/FT) (CY) (CY)
R-17
R-18
R-19
R-20
R-21
R-22
R-23
R-24
R-25
�R-26(Taper)^ 986 10,0 9,864`: - 500" 736 J. 12,8 ?; •9,432 .432 ;^
R37 :: 1095 1781 3 39 51= nit 109511 8$0'4,i1;19.7101,4 u 141
r 8-29. .>, ,,,3526 ."10-Q•.. M:.10 6` _ .- ..1.526'�' 10:2 10,450;;=x ..194nr
• 942_': -. =10.0 .9.385 ": - =38 ':-
.R=30{I_eper) 1033 80:O::r, 810330-.- .500. .783• 13.0 10.179- -151
R-31
R-32
R-33
R-34 ------
R-35
R-36
R-37
R-38
R-39
R-40
R-41
R-42
R-43
�'R-44fT•aper) 8,000:;- 5.0::. .5000=.. -:350 825 18.11'-* 14,942;. '.0,942
115 - 8,078.: 35A? 38,138 1,078` 28,5 50:703<..• _7,435'.:`
_R-47(Taper) 1953 r 5.2" 5.000'"" 500;•'- 703 5' 6.7 4.739 ?, • --261
R-48
_
R-49 _----
T-50gaper) � 1208-° 2.1 -2.5005- 500 250 14.5 3,625`8-: - 1125'
R-51'!: 8,108• 145 46,057- 1,108 14.5':. ,16045 ' '--12 '--
1-52 967 :26'.6 25,126 967:': 26.5'I :25,408 =718 :.:..
33-
R-54(Trapor): 500 50_....�2,50(f,_L 400 860 .'-2.5>` :,2,134; -366'
R-55
�1 R-56
R-57 I
':Taper:::. '14,613-, .:'200-i: 100' 755'a•"7;550-?. =7,063?:-�
404 - '18,613 f.
R-58``'' 1 737 - 58,4?• 43,057 t 737 , 61.8:-''9.45,530 2,473
'R-59 1,035 30,4 31,470 1,035 25.7 26.565 tr -4,905`:``.
R-60 1,081: 10.0 10.813 • 1.081': 10.0 10,850 37
11-61 1,049- -10,0 10,488 -1,049: 13.7 (4375'- 3.887 i';.
11-62 -:: 1.015 +17:8 :-18;098- 1,015_ 18.0 18308': 210 5:
Rb3 '967 r' X18-3=: 17,691: - 967- ^18.2 17585- -106
R 64(Taper) -854.::: 5,9 I:. ;.5 000'p: -•500? 604:, 5:3 3,221 -1,779 `.
11-65
R-66
R-67 -
_ R-68
I8-69(Toper) 4,813:-
R-70"°r :800.. 15;6 '..12.513 :800'' .15.6, 12,504 -9 'r..
R-71 803 22.8': 18,284 '803`' 22.8 18,291' 7
1173 �
11-74 —_ y11
R-75
R-76
R-77
R-78 I
R-79
R-80 _
R-81
R 82
R-83
Total: 24,616 419.120 22,080 387.395 -31,725
1)0(511(I)Derived from Tables 5 through 7 of the Sept.2009 Three Year Post-Construction Monitoring Report prepared by
CP&E
(2)Derived from CP&E 2012"Design Matrix for 6-Year Renourishment Interval"in Appendix E of the"Collier
County Beaches 2013-14 Renourishmeru Project Description with Engineering and Design Summary"
(3)Volumes derived by Atkins utilizing point files,elevations,and drawings provided by CP&E
2013 project extents
Effective distance developed by Atkins using different length than identified by CPE
Effective Distance Equation for Tapers
(((tZ ,,.)(0.50))
0(.j. =(der-.v j10DOA—
0(x-vo„
where
d0(.effective distance used for volume wlc in taper
da.,va,=effective distance for adjacent R-Monument
-taper length
Packet Page -467-
ATTACHMENT NO.2 1/22/2013 Item 11 .A.
DRAFT Collier County Beach Renourishment Project
Bid No. t�
Base Bid:Collier County Alone
Schedule of Bid Items
Bid Item for Nourishment between 11/1/13 to 5/1/14 No. Units Unit Price Subtotal
1.Mobilization/Demobilization 1 L.S.
2.Payment and Performance Bond 1 L.S.
3.Dredge Sand from Borrow Area or Transport Sand from Upland 57,000 C.Y.
Sand Source,Place and Grade at Vanderbilt Beach
4.Dredge Sand from Borrow Area or Transport Sand from Upland 112,851 C.Y.
Sand Source,Place and Grade at Park Shore
5.Dredge Sand from Borrow Area or Transport Sand from Upland 230,149 C.Y.
Sand Source,Place and Grade at Naples Beach
•
6.Beach Tilling 1 L.S.
7.Turbidity Monitoring 1 L.S.
8. Maintenance of Traffic 1 L.S.
9.Mobilization/Demobilization Turtle Trawler 1 L.S.
10. Relocation Trawling Day
11.Endangered Species Observer 1 L.S.
12. Set Buoys for Primary Pipeline Corridor(PI,P2,and P3), 3 L.S.
Pumpout and Booster Locations
Instructions:
1. Item 8 does not apply for offshore sand source bidders
2. Items 9. 10, I I,and 12 do not apply to upland source bidders
3.Collier County can change the volume by reach+/-25%with no change in unit cost. The total volume range is 300,000 cy to
500,000 cy with a bid volume of 400,000 cy.
4. Collier County reserves the right to select an all dredging proposal;an all truck haul proposal or any combination of the two
methods by segment.
5.The fixed costs(Items 6,7,8,9, 10,and 11)will be prorated based on the percentage of sand installed to the total project sand
volume.
6.Collier County reserves the right to evaluate bids based on costs,means,methods and construction approach and select the most
value approach to the county.
TOTAL $
Total Written in Words:
Packet Page-468-