Loading...
Agenda 03/13/2018 Item #17A03/13/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district to allow for development of up to 40,000 square feet of commercial development for a project to be known as 15501 Old US 41 CPUD; and providing an effective date. The subject property is located on the west side of Old US 41, approximately one mile north of the US 41 and Old US 41 intersection, in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20170001083] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is comprised of two parcels located on the west side of Old US 41, approximately one mile north of the US 41 and Old US 41 intersection, in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 4.85+/- acres. The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the FLUE of the Collier County GMP. Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD). Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria. The FLUE provision the petitioner is relying upon to achieve consistency is the Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict. The FLUE consistency review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP. In short, the proposed CPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. 17.A Packet Pg. 1085 03/13/2018 Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2016 and 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” The proposed PUDZ on the subject property was reviewed based on the then applicable 2016 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted with the application indicates that the proposed, new commercial development will generate approximately 216 PM peak hour unadjusted two-way trips. Staff also evaluated the traffic impacts for the proposed project based on the recently adopted 2017 AUIR, which are also included in the table below. Roadway Link 2016 AUIR Existing LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Service Volume/Peak Direction 2016 Remaining Capacity 2017 AUIR LOS 2017 Remaining Capacity Old US 41 Lee County Line to US 41 to (Tamiami Trail) E 1,000/North 29 F -87 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Old US 41 to Lee County Line C 3,100/North 977 C 905 US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Old US 41 to Immokalee Road D 3,100/North 485 D 173 Staff notes that the Old US 41 roadway is over-capacity based on the 2017 AUIR. Roadway 17.A Packet Pg. 1086 03/13/2018 improvements are currently scheduled, but they are outside of the current 5-year plan. This project is more importantly located within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) boundary and is therefore subject to Policy 5.6 of the GMP. This policy requires any new development exceeding LOS levels within a TCMA designated area must provide documentation that at least two Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies are provided/used. The specific TDM’s for this development shall be provided at time of Site Development Plan SDP or SDPA review. Based on the 2016 AUIR, the 2017 AUIR, and applicable TCMA provisions, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed new trips for the project, based on the GMP Policy noted above, within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.117 acres of the existing native vegetation is required for preservation and shall be dedicated to Collier County. The Project’s current Master Plan proposes a 1.17 acre preserve area. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20170001083 on January 18, 2018, but was continued to the February 1, 2018, CCPC meeting due to revisions to the PUD document recommended by the CCPC. At the February 1, 2018 meeting, the CCPC recommended approval by a vote of 6-0 (Commissioner Ebert was absent when the vote was taken) and recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. The concerns raised and stipulations added to the PUD by the CCPC include: *Listing the permitted uses rather than all C-3 uses to ensure that the traffic impact to Old US 41 is limited and the project is compatible with abutting residential property. *Allowing amplified outdoor sound only associated with the food store and eating places and limiting the permitted hours from 9 am to 9 pm. * Adding a reference to a wall or fence in the type B buffer along the north property line. *Adding a distance requirement for the restaurant of 100 feet from the north property line. *Limiting traffic peak hour trips until the Old US 41 roadway link capacity issue is addressed and deemed concurrent. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site-specific rezone from the a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the 15501 Old US 41 CPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for CPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in 17.A Packet Pg. 1087 03/13/2018 relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed CPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with CPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications a re justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed CPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested CPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 17.A Packet Pg. 1088 03/13/2018 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed CPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the CPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studie s, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has been reviewed as to form and legality, and an affirmative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to rezone to the CPUD zoning district. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report 1-18-18 (PDF) 2. Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (PDF) 17.A Packet Pg. 1089 03/13/2018 3. Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 4. Continuance Supplemental Staff Report - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (PDF) 5. Continuance Cover Letter - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (PDF) 6. [Linked] Back Up Material (PDF) 7. Legal Ad - Agenda ID #4519 (PDF) 17.A Packet Pg. 1090 03/13/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A Doc ID: 4519 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district to allow for development of up to 40,000 square feet of commercial development for a project to be known as 15501 Old US 41 CPUD; and providing an effective date. The subject property is located on the west side of Old US 41, approximately one mile north of the US 41 and Old US 41 intersection, in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20170001083] Meeting Date: 03/13/2018 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 02/06/2018 10:07 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 02/06/2018 10:07 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 02/07/2018 9:56 AM Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 02/08/2018 9:34 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 02/08/2018 9:48 AM Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 02/08/2018 4:28 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 02/12/2018 4:14 PM Growth Management Department James French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 02/15/2018 10:29 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 02/16/2018 1:39 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 02/20/2018 7:48 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 02/20/2018 9:06 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 03/03/2018 4:43 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 03/13/2018 9:00 AM 17.A Packet Pg. 1091 AGENDA ITEM 9-D 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1Packet Pg. 1093Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.1 Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: Staff Report 1-18-18 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2Packet Pg. 1114Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.2 Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.3Packet Pg. 1120Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.3Packet Pg. 1121Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.3Packet Pg. 1122Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.3Packet Pg. 1123Attachment: Attachment B - FLUE Consistency Review (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.4Packet Pg. 1124Attachment: Continuance Supplemental Staff Report - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.4Packet Pg. 1125Attachment: Continuance Supplemental Staff Report - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.5Packet Pg. 1126Attachment: Continuance Cover Letter - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 17.A.5Packet Pg. 1127Attachment: Continuance Cover Letter - 2-1-2018 CCPC meeting (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ)) 'ENGINEERING NIM SYNOPSIS 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 WALDROP ENGINEERING CML ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 BONRA 6AANOE DR. 6306 FBOKWA SPIWOK R 34135 Pi 239-405-7777 F: 239405.7899 Memorandum To: Timothy Finn, AICP From: Lindsay F. Robin cc: Frank Norberto; Craig Hazelett Date: October 31, 2017 Subject: 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD (PL2010001083) Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., on behalf of Frank Norberto and DGC&B, LLC and Collier County Staff, conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Wednesday, October 25, 2017. The meeting was held at 6:00 p.m. at the Christus Victor Lutheran Church at 15600 Tamiami Trail North. The sign -in sheet is attached as Exhibit "A", and demonstrates three (3) residents were in attendance, not including the consultant team, Applicants and Staff. Handouts were distributed outlining the project overview, proposed uses, and development regulations, and are attached as Exhibit "B". Alexis Crespo and Lindsay Robin (Agents) conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff, and an overview of the proposed CPUD rezoning application, including the location of commercial buildings, intended C-3 and mail order house uses, maximum square footage of development, location of preserve areas, and access. They also outlined the rezoning process and opportunities to provide input at public hearings. Following the Consultant's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agents questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. Question/Comment 1: What kind of pool products? Response: We manufacture pool brushes, pool nets, pool vacuum cleaners, etc. (no manufacturing will occur on-site). Question/Comment 2: No chemicals? Page 1 of 3 L^ Response: No. We are not in the pool service business, we get packages and send them out. We don't even do the manufacturing. Question/Comment 3: Where do the trucks come in to pick up? Response: We don't know yet, but the site will be designed so the trucks can come around the building. Question/Comment 4: We hear traffic on Old 41 now, and it wouldn't be too pleasing if it was a lot more. Response: The trucks come quarterly, so we don't get shipments every day. They come very infrequently. Keeping vegetation along western boundary will help keep a lot of that noise away. Question/Comment 5 and 6: Is it possible, once this is approved, to come back and get rid of the vegetation? Response: Reducing native preserve requires an amendment to the PUD, so we would have to go back through the PUD process and notify the public. They do not allow you to make changes like that without notifying the public and going through the full public hearing process. It's not developable land. Very unlikely anyone would ever try to reduce the preserve in that area. Question/Comment 7: Where is the boundary of Sterling Oaks? Response: [Point on aerial where the project abuts Sterling Oaks] Question/Comment 7: So, the parcel to the north of this parcel [Parcel A] also extends into the FPL easement? Response: We have the PUD boundary here, yes it does. Question/Comment 7: That triangle piece is not owned by Sterling Oaks? [Pointing to southern boundary below project parcel] Response: That parcel is not owned by Sterling Oaks, but it is within the Sterling Oaks PUD zoning district. Question/Comment 7: Someone else owns it? Response: Correct. Question/Comment 7: There's potential for development there? Do you know who owns it? Response: Yes, there is potential for development there. No, we do not know who owns it. You can call Collier County and they can tell you. Question/Comment 7: How is the square footage of the buildings determined? Is it based on the 4.85+/- acres of parcels? Page 2 of 3 Response: We are a PUD, so we can ask for the square footage, and also the size of the site dictates how much you can build. We take stormwater, required parking, buffers, preserve, the FPL easement, all of those things in to account and that drives the square footage. We laid everything out with how the trucks can circulate, and that is how we came to that square footage. Question/Comment 7: [To Tim] Is it true that the preserve parcel/FPL easement is subtracted out and then the square footage is determined on the remainder? Response: Tim — I can check into it. Agent — commercial intensity is not calculated the way residential density is. It's not dictated by the zoning district, we're not limited in any way other than what works from a site standpoint and what we agree, or ask for, and the County determines is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, and what the roads can handle in terms of square footage. Question/Comment 7: In terms of height? How high? Is it limited to that? Response: 35' is the zoned height, and 45' is the actual height. The actual height is the Malkin" height including the tip top of the roof. Question/Comment 7: When you go to public hearing will you have more developed plans, or will that come afterwards? Response: This is a zoning -level plan, and at time of SDP is when they will submit construction -level detailed plans. Question/Comment 7: 1 noticed driving by there is a drainage ditch along the FPL easement? Where is that in relationship to the planned retention ponds? Is it right on the FPL easement, or how will you separate it? Response: That level of detail gets worked out at the time of SDP. We are not proposing for our lakes to be in the FPL easement. There were no further questions or comments. Ms. Crespo thanked the attendees for coming and noted that their contact information is available for those who wished to reach out with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 6:25 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit "C". Page 3 of 3 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 15501 OLD US 41 CPUD PL20170001083 October 25, 2017 @ 6:00p.m. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***please be aolvCsed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, ST Zip E -Mail Address co. Asz %% 11y) 5,1vUs n 3116 a S do 0,13 -cc,. �W �h S�-cA� Irk►- Y1. Shau.r�— lames �. ��,�`,., cyzn l I Cc cln t - C C DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 15501 OLD US 41 CPUD Development of the 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance U and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district shall apply. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP). SPS = Same as Principal Structure (1) All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. (2) Front setback is measured from back of curb for private roads and accessways only. Page 1 of 1 0 TABLE I COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS(') PERMITTED USES AND STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES Min. Lot Area 10,000 SF N/A Min. Lot Width 75' N/A Min. Lot Depth 100' N/A PUD BOUNDARY SETBACKS (EXTERNAL) Old U.S. 41 25' SPS North Boundary 25' SPS South Boundary 20' SPS SETBACKS (INTERNAL) Front/Internal Drives (2) 10' 10' Side 10' SPS Rear 10' SPS FPL Easement 0' SPS Canal 20' SPS Preserve 25' SPS Min. Distance Between Principal Structures 1/2 Building Height 10, MAXIMUM HEIGHT Actual Zoned 45' 35' 45' 35' SPS = Same as Principal Structure (1) All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. (2) Front setback is measured from back of curb for private roads and accessways only. Page 1 of 1 0 15501 OLD US 41 ROAD CPUD (PL20170001083) COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES (PARCELS A AND B) No building or structure, or part thereof, up to an aggregate 40,000 square feet of gross floor area, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses and Structures: 1. All permitted uses listed under the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) 2. Catalog and Mail Order Houses (Retail Miscellaneous, Group 5961) — limited to 7,500 square feet and limited to Parcel B. Any other principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with Permitted Principal Uses including but not limited to: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures 2. Caretaker's residence, subject to LDC Section 5.03.05, limited to one (1) dwelling unit 3. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 4. Water management facilities Any other accessory use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, or Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the process outlined in the LDC. C. Prohibited Uses The following uses are prohibited within the CPUD: 1. Tattoo/piercing parlors (7299) 2. Adult entertainment and sexually oriented businesses (7999) 3. Pawn shops (5932) Page 1 of 1 15501 OLD US 41 ROAD CPUD (PL-PL20170001083) Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Wednesday, October 25, 2017 Project Size: 4.85+/ -acres Future Land Use: Urban Residential Subdistrict Current Zoning: Rural Agricultural Proposed Zoning: Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPDD) Approved Density/Uses: Currently Vacant Proposed Density/Uses: A catalog and mail order house use and a range of commercial uses permitted in the Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district. The maximum requested commercial intensity is 40,000 square feet. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance (Signature oaApplicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 9 day of Noyt rn P -re a- , 2017 by A 6-tj s er& s ro , who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. (Signature of Notary P blit) (Notary Sea!) Printed Name of Notary + Renee d'Arcy MY COMM WON # FF227079 �epa� EXPIRES: May 03, 2019 G:\NIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NIM Oct2010.Doc ' ' 1 AIENGINEERING PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE September 29, 2017 RE: 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD PL20170001083 Dear Property Owner: BONITA SPRINGS Tampa Orlando Sarasota 28100 Rondo Gmro& Dr.. Sudo 305, Sonia Spngp. FL 34135 p (2301405-7777 f 12391405-7899 Please be advised that Waldrop Engineering, P.A. on behalf of Frank Norberto and DGC&B, LLC, has filed a formal application to Collier County seeking approval to rezone the property from Rural Agricultural (A) to Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow for commercial uses including a Catalog and Mail Order House. The maximum requested commercial intensity is 40,000 square feet. The subject property totals 4.85+/- acres and is located at 15501 & 15805 Old US 41 Road, to the west of Old US 41 and 1 mile north of Tamiami Trail North in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this application and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday October 25, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. at Christus Victor Lutheran Church, 15600 Tamiami Trail N, Naples, FL 34110. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 ext. 2207, or alexis.crespo(@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEER/NG, P.A. =!4 Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning *Please note that Christus Victor Lutheran Church does not sponsor or endorse this program. 6A 'uesdav, October 10, 2017 Napes Dalry New: Bees COMmued from Page 3A McAvoy said hives are moved all over the country, so compensation could come from hives from other areas. Councell, operator of Councell Farms in Cape Coral and a local beekeeper and bee removal expert, agreed but added that because of the loss of forage like Brazilian peeper' trees, any bees will encoumer issues. Walker operates Walker Farms in North Fort Myers with his wife, Joyce. His operation uses bees for South- west Florida crop pollination, mainly in area citrus groves, and he agreed that them could be some effects From the bee kisses. 'You Tl see a slight change," he said. Irma "destroyed the fall crops, and therell be some honey shortages." He said his bees are still making honey but not much. "They're making honey for them," he said "No for mel' Walker said he lost 85 hives to Irma and did so only because weather reports that the storm was going to run offshore prompted him to move hives away from possi- ble surge auras. If I would have left my hives on Pune Island they would have been fine," he said. "I moved them to Fort Myers, and they drowned" The storm could not have come at a worse time, Coun- cell said. "Pollination is in October," he said. "I don't know what we're going to do." His operation lost up to 600 hives, Councell said. At one of hissites, near Old Metro Parkway, 80 hives were reduced m about 20 when Irma's water flooded the field- .There ield"There could be some shortages," he said, with c i - cumbers, zucchini and watermelons the first crops that could be affected. Additionally, the wet ground will delay planting and the plants won't be ready for pollinating at their usual time, said David Westervelt, chief of apiary in the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services' Bu. reau of Plant & Apiary Inspection. Beekeepers will likely spend the winter building up bee growth by feeding their bees. 'They'll give Nem welfare," Westervelt said, "Bee- keepers are very resourcefuL" Councell has had to buy sugar and feed his bees. Itsugar," 's never cheap to buy gar," he said Sugar used to feed is costs about 48 cents a pound, and about 40 pounds is used to feed one hive for the winter. Be" for Callforttla Florida bees are also used in California to pollinate crops like almonds. "There's no bees for that;" Councell said. That almond crop will need bees in January and Feb- ruary, Westervelt said, and likely Florida bees won't have had the time to be revitalized by then. In addition to drowning bees, the floodwaters wrecked the wooden hive boxes, spoiled honey and al- lowed beetles to infest hives. Walker said hive beetle infestations reuse honey- combs to devolve into a slimy wax mess. The larva M hi beetle filled many his that Nave flooded by Hurricane Irma. These hives beloin to Councell Farms. wEbAL TO USA 1OOAN N—OU KOM Courrell, owner of Councell Fans and a beekeeper lost up to 600 of 1,200 hives due to flooding from Hurricane Iron. MICHAELaxAUNNSA 00-117w.- F_OaiOA Walker said beekeepers will have to absorb the dam- age. Councell added that there's no insurance to coverag- ricultural losses like this. "rhe numbers game of this is a mess," Councell said, adding that a rough estimate of his loss would be in the $300,000 range. It's a whole side of the storm nobody knows about," he said. But Councell, founder and former president of the 62 - member Beekeepers Association of Southwest Florida and vice chairman of the Florida Farm Bureau Apiary Committee, is no the only one in Southwest Florida af. fected, he said "All the commercial operations are going through this," he said Affected hives need to be cleaned of debris, moldand dead bees before being used, if then. Hives that sat in water for days or weeks will need to be thrown out, Westervelt said "You can't use them," he said. The next step for Councell is to try to "grow" hives by dividing some of those that remain and buying a queen from a bee breeder or making his own for the new hive. Either option takes tune, he said. "rhat takes a lot of money and a to of work" he said. Connect with this reporter: MichaelBraunNP (Face - book) @MichaelBralmNP (Twitter). inspiration V EMERSON IN STr]CK Lighting First® 2 12 2 MMIN t7 0lal 15 4 NNNf'W t7ggldwilfilEEniINGG6 Nat! hIN NW41,11i € I tiNh 41 'ti, si NN NNNNi,1NN1i76iiNNNNNNN NNENN WN 6614 NNt9N NNt4 aNNNhiNNhiNNNNti NNNN NNN hiNafilNN NNNN cruor. ,o DAN'S FAN CITY Naples Only Fall Service Fan Specialist for over 37 Years! (239)263-0444 Farts lar even, budget and styk! G� 358(1 N. Tamianii de Parkway Road w is Boars Springs - 267915 famlawi . 239-1A914%9 Free* Basic Fan Install Ca, . Fm Ch. MC. Groins IEC 13001 Stop in and see our extensive selection of IditionA and Contemporary Hand -Knotted Ru Ali's Oriental Rugs, Inc, Best Prices in Naples Big Selection! Entire Inventory 60 to 75% off! Professional Consulting Appraisals and Cleaning 6250 SHIRLEY STT #505, NAPLES 239.254.0166 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Waldrop Engineering, PA on behalf of Frank Norberto and DGC&B. LLC at the following time and location: Wednesday, October 25, 2017. at 6:00 p.m. Christus Victor Lutheran Church 15600 Tamiam, Trail N, Naples, FL 34110 The subject property totals 4.85+/- acres and Is located at 15501 & 15805 Old US 41 Road, to the west of Old US 41 and 1 mile north of Tamiaml Trail North in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Ronda. The Property Owners have filed a rezoning application with Collier County (PL20170001083). The request, for a project known as 15501 Old US 41 Road CPDD. is to rezone the property from Rural Agricultural (A) to Commercial Planned Unit Development ICPUDI to allow for the development of a maximum of 40.000 square feet of commercial uses. including 16,250 square feet of office, 16,250 square feet of commercial retail. and a 7,500 -square foot Catalog and Mail Order House use. 1 'J PROJECT _ LOCATION I - VdE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners and residents are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners' representatives and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting. but have questions or comments, they can be directed to. Waldrop Engineering. RA. c/o Alexis Crespo 28100 Sonka Grande Dr., Saute 305, Bonita Springs. FL 34135 (239) 405-7777, ext. 2207 OR alexis.crespo®waidmpengineering.com 'Please note that Christus Victor Lutheran Church does not sponsor or endorse this program. October 10, 2017 ND -1775291 NaptjCS �At11J CWS Nag ;.Com Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Pub Dates October 10, 2017 c (Sign1ature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This October 10, 2017 1775291 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMA ,,.. KAROL E IUNGAS - . Notary %blk - State of Wda commisslon r GG 126011 ' MyC mm.ExplresJU29,2021 4. lmomaow"Am P.O.# `Yy�e (Signature of affiant) 1775291 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMA ,,.. KAROL E IUNGAS - . Notary %blk - State of Wda commisslon r GG 126011 ' MyC mm.ExplresJU29,2021 4. lmomaow"Am P.O.# 0918/0919,,:, tiaAV oaAE aigifedwoo ww Lg x ww q }ewjo; ap alianblt3 09 L8/09 LS, tiaAV qm aigitedwoo „9/9 Z x „L ozls iagel DGC&B LLC MIDGARD SELF STOR NAPLES 2 LLC SWF DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 5051 TAMIAMI TRL N 1905 WOODSTOCK RD 13910 OLD COAST RD NAPLES, FL 34103---2802 BUILDING 900 SUITE 9100 NAPLES, FL 34108---0000 ROSWELL, GA 33075---0000 NTG PARTNERSHIP RAILHEAD HOLDINGS LLC NTG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2740 68TH ST SW 1401 RAIL HEAD BLVD STE B 2740 68TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 NAPLES, FL 34110---8488 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 COLLIER CNTY NAPLES AMBERLEY LLC NORBERTO, FRANK C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 380 UNION ST STE 300 5930 AMBERWOCD DRIVE 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089--4128 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 NAPLES, FL 34112--0000 PUBLIC STORAGE INC H3 INC NAPLES OLD 41 LLC DEPT PT FL 25428 1360 RAIL HEAD BLVD 100110TH AVE S # 101 PO BOX 25025 NAPLES, FL 34110---8427 NAPLES, FL 34102---0000 GLENDALE, CA 91221---5025 STERLING OAKS COMMUNITY ASSOC AND CLUB INC 822 STERLING OAKS BLVD NAPLES, FL 34110---6213 C7 ® label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 195160/8160 S3�dtl1S MENGINEERING APPLICATION 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 m C0LL18Y Ci0umy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F. APPLICANT CONTAC'f INFORMATIOil= Name of Applicant(s): Ultimate Developments, LLC c/o Frank Norberto Jr. & DGC&B, LLC c/o Craig Hazelett Address: 7326 Acorn Way & 5051 Tamiami Trail N. City: !Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E -Mail Address: frank@waterdrop-products.com & craig@driftwoodgardencenter.com Name of Agent: Alexis V. Crespo, AICP Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: 239-405-7777 Cell: 239-850-8525 Fax: 239-405-7899 E -Mail Address: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 16 Co;er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: I 10 Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership DGC&B, LLC c/o Craig Hazelett 100% 15805 OLD 41 Naples, FL 34110 Ultimate Developments, LLC c/o Frank Norberto Jr. & Frank Norberto III 50%50% 7326 Acorn Way Naples, FL 34119 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercenLage Ui inLUIU!A. Name and Address % of Ownership N/A If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address I % of Ownership N/A 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 16 Col ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, S" LUL.RIIUIUCIs, UeIIeIILId11C5, Ur pd(Lrlers: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: N/A f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of` I IL.CI �) II d L.UI I.lUI dLIU11, Name and Address N/A g. Date subject property acquired 10/13/17 & 7/7/05 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 16 Godley County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Agricultural (A) Zoning district(s) to the Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.. N/A Catalog & Mail Order House and C-3 Uses PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: ID /4 8 25 Lot: Block: Subdivision: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: See PUD Document Exhibit D Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00144960006;00143160001 Size of Property: 360 ft x 700 ft _ 252,000 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 4.86+/ - Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 15501 & 15805 Old 41, Naples, 34110 PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑■ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial 2/21/2017 Page 4 of 16 ry Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N PUD Multi-Family/Affordable Housing Complex S PUD Vacant (Industrial Section of Sterling Oaks PUD) E Public rightof-way; Industrial Right -Of -Way; Storage/Warehouses W PUD Preserve (Sterling Oaks PUD) If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: A ASSOCIATIONS a Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colIiergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Sterling Oaks Community Association and Club Inc. Mailing Address: 822 Sterling Oaks Blvd. City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34110 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: 2/21/2017 City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: City: State: ZIP: State: ZIP: Page 5 of 16 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Cofer County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE M NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 2/21/2017 Page 6 of 16 rl1 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N/A Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ■❑ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. 11 LDC subsection 10.02.08 D 11 This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezonine. amendment or chane, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 2/21/2017 Page 7 of 16 CA -r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: O Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5`h and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. (L Jim 0 Signature of Pet i er or Agent (01 Ito I 9o('.1. Date 2/21/2017 Page 13 of 16 • 0 LIENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 COVER LETTER/NARRATIVE OF REQUEST WALDROP ENGINEERING CML ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 28100 BONRA GRANDE DR. 6305 BMIFA SPiMNK FL 34135 P. 239.406.7777 F: 239405-7899 June 21, 2017 REVISED AUGUST 2017 Mr. Eric Johnson, AICP Zoning & Land Development Review Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: 15501 Old US 41 CPUD Rezone Application PL20170001083 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed for your review is an Application for PUD rezone for the 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD ("Property'), a 4.85+/- acre project located at 15501 & 15805 Old US 41 Road, to the west of Old US 41 and 1 mile north of Tamiami Trail North. The Property is designated within the Urban Residential Subdistrict per the Collier County Future Land Use Map, and is zoned Rural Agricultural (A). The Applicant is requesting approval to rezone the Property to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) subject to the Office and In -Fill commercial Subdistrict provisions in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The project will allow for a catalog and mail order house use and a range of commercial uses permitted in the Commercial Intermediate (C-3) zoning district. The maximum requested commercial intensity is 40,000 square feet, or an approximate FAR of 0.2. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed CPUD is comprised of two (2) parcels. The northern parcel comprises 3.70+/- acres and is currently vacant. The southern parcel comprises 1.15+/- acres and is also vacant except for an existing access to Old US 41. The subject Property is bisected by a 100' FPL easement, which runs north to south on the western portion of the Property. A Collier County drainage canal also runs parallel to the FPL easement. The Property is located in an urbanized, and predominantly industrial area of the County with approximately 430+/- feet of frontage on Old US 41, a two-lane collector roadway. In terms of immediately adjacent uses, the Property abuts a multi -family PUD known as Arbor Lake Club to the north, Old US 41 to the east, the industrial -zoned portion of the Sterling Oaks PUD to the south, and preserve areas within the Sterling Oaks PUD to the west. The CPUD will expand the County's commercial land uses in an area readily serviced by public infrastructure, and adjacent to existing light industrial uses, in order to serve the existing and future populations in this portion of the County. 15501 Old US 41 Road - CPUD Cover Letter Page 1 of 4 REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) rezoning to allow for the development of a maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial uses, including 16,250 SF of office, 16,250 SF of commercial retail, and a 7,500 SF catalog and mail order house use (Business Service Group 5961). The application proposes to utilize the Office and In -Fill commercial Subdistrict provisions in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), as outlined in Evaluation Criteria enclosed to allow for the commercial usage of the property. As outlined in this application, the CPUD will allow for a logical transition of intensity along the Old 41 corridor frontage to the preserve lands to the west, and will be compatible with the adjacent high density residential use to the north, and approved industrial uses to the south. The project is immediately adjacent to approved industrial uses; is infill in terms of its size and the surrounding development pattern; and can provide for neighborhood commercial uses and employment within close proximity to existing neighborhoods, existing and planned public infrastructure, and transit facilities. As shown on the enclosed PUD master plan, the catalog and mail order house use will be located on the southern portion of the CPUD, adjacent to the industrial zoned section of Sterling Oaks PUD. This is the most intensive use based on review of Commercial Use Regulations in the LDC, and is appropriately located away from the multi -family residential uses to the north of the PUD. The mail order house will be buffered from the adjacent residential via Commercial Intermediate C-3 uses in the northern portion of the PUD. Compatibility is also addressed via the required perimeter buffers and the clustering of commercial on the eastern portion of the site with water management and open space areas oriented along the western perimeter of the project, adjacent to existing preserve lands in Sterling Oaks. Per Commitment 2.D of the proposed PUD document, the Applicant will provide bicycle rack facilities and internal pedestrian sidewalk and crosswalk connections internal to the development to the adjacent properties. ENVIRONMENTAL: Per the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by Dexter Bender and Associates, Inc., no state or federal listed species were observed on-site or within the project's vicinity, and the site contains 1.17 acres of native vegetation. In accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07 and Policy 6.1.1(1) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, 0.1 17 acres of native vegetation are required for this commercial project. Pursuant to Commitment 4.A in the enclosed PUD document, the Applicant will provide the native vegetation requirements on-site. As shown on the enclosed MCP, the project proposes to provide open space and native vegetation west of the FPL easement in order to create a contiguous network of habitat adjacent to Sterling Oaks preserve lands to the west. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Cover Letter Page 2 of 4 INFRASTRUCTURE: The subject property will be accessed via a proposed full access drive onto southbound Old US 41 Road, a two-lane rural un -divided arterial roadway. Access to the site and internal circulation are depicted on Exhibit "C" PUD Master Plan in the PUD document. The enclosed Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, Inc., the analyzed road segment is within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCMA contains sufficient capacity to maintain a minimum 85% threshold of its lane miles at or above the Level of Service (LOS) standard described in the Collier County Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4. The Applicant has proferred Transportation Commitment 2.A in Exhibit "F" of the PUD document to establish a maximum of 192 two-way, peak hour trips for the project. Per transportation commitment 2.C, compensating right-of-way will be provided, as applicable, at the time of SDP -Plat for the required turn lanes. Additionally, new commercial development within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least 2 of the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicable that are listed within that section. The selection of specific TDM strategies will be considered at the time of a future SDP/PPL application. Potable water and sanitary sewer services for this project will be provided by Collier County Utilities (CCU). Water service is available from a 16" water main running along the east side of Old US 41. Wastewater service is available from a 12" force main, also installed along the east side of Old US 41. Drainage and stormwater management systems will be self-contained on site, and all required regulatory agency permits will be obtained prior to commencement of construction activities. CONCLUSION: In summary, the 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD is a compact, infill commercial development project located in an urban area of the County, and in close proximity to existing and available public infrastructure. Through the Office and In -Fill Commercial provisions found in the GMP, the project proposes an appropriate mix of commercial uses, which provide appropriate transitions to neighboring industrial and high density residential development to the north and south. The CPUD will provide commercial uses and employment opportunities within walking distance of several multi- family projects, including an affordable housing development, which is precisely the type of land use planning intended by the County's GMP. The project also provides for contiguous native habitat via the proposed preserve areas in the western portion of the site, to serve as an extension of the Sterling Oaks preserve areas. As outlined in the attached application, the CPUD will be consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) upon expansion of the Office and In -Fill Commercial Subdistrict. Per the Pre -Application Meeting Notes, the following items have been electronically uploaded for your review: 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Cover Letter Page 3 of 4 1. A check in the amount of $17,400 for the CPUD Rezone Application Fees including the Transportation Methodology fee; 2. One (1) copy of the submittal cover letter detailing the purpose of the rezoning request; 3. One (1) copy of the completed PUD Rezone Application including Evaluation Criteria; 4. One (1) copy of the Pre -application meeting notes; 5. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the Owner Affidavits; 6. One (1) original and one (1) of the Covenants of Unified Control; 7. One (1) copy of the approved Addressing Checklist dated 03/23/17; 8. One (1) copy of the Warranty Deeds; 9. One (1) copy of the List Identifying all Property Owners and all parties of corporation; 10. One (1) copy of the Boundary Survey prepared by Benchmark Land Services, Inc. (signed and sealed); 1 l .One (1) copy of Project Aerial; 12. One (1) copy of the Utility Provisions Statement (no sketches required); 13. One (1) copy of the Environmental Impact Statement with FLUCCS Map prepared by Dexter Bender and Associates, Inc.; 14. One (1) copy of the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Solutions; 15. One (1) copy of PUD Document; 16. One (1) copy of the Justification for Requested Deviations; and 17. One (1) copy of the PUD Conceptual Site Plan (24"x36"). Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777, Ext. 2207, or alexis.crespoP-waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALD90P ENG/NEER/NG, P.A. XNIC Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning Enclosures cc: Frank Norberto Craig Hazelett, DGCB&B, LLC 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Cover Letter Page 4 of 4 ' �ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 EVALUATION CRITERIA ME ro� EVALUATION CRITERIA PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS 15501 OLD US 41 ROAD CPUD a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The 4.6+/- acre site ("Property') is located on Old US 41 Road just north of the intersection of Old 41 Road and Railhead Boulevard, within Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in northern unincorporated Collier County. In terms of the surrounding development pattern, a multi-family/affordable housing PUD is developed to the north of the property; Old US 41 Road, a two-lane arterial roadway is to the east; vacant industrial lands in the Sterling Oaks PUD are to the south as well as a small segment of preserve lands from the Sterling Oaks PUD; and preserve lands in the Sterling Oaks PUD are also to the west. The proposed project serves as an infill commercial PUD in an area of the County where commercial uses are appropriate to service the surrounding area. The proposed CPUD will provide a logical transition of land use from the affordable housing/multi-family uses to the north to the more intense future industrial development to the south. The CPUD will be compatible with the surrounding uses through the internal arrangement of tracts, and the placement of required landscape buffers, open space, water management and building locations, as shown on the enclosed PUD Master Plan. The proposed development area is clustered along the Old US 41 frontage avoid impacts to existing preserve lands to the west. Additionally, the most intensive use (Misc. Retail, mail order and catalog house) is located adjacent to industrial zoned property to the south, and away fromexisting multi -family uses to the north. Collier County Utilities are available along Old US 41 Road to provide potable water and sanitary sewer services to the proposed development. Per the Traffic Impact Statement prepared by Trebilcock Consulting Services the East Central TCMA contains sufficient capacity to remain below the 85% capacity threshold. Therefore, based upon the nature of surrounding uses, the established development pattern along Old US 41 corridor, and the project's access to this roadway, as well as the existing levels of public infrastrcture to service the proposed PUD, the Property is suitable for the development of commercial uses as proposed through this application. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 7 The subject property is under unfied control by two separate property owners. One parcel is owned by Ultimate Developments LLC, and the other parcel is owned by DGC & B, LLC as demonstrated by the Warranty Deeds and Covenants of Unified Control included in the application. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what subdistrict, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that subdistrict, policy or other provision.) The applicant is proposing infill commercial uses in accordance with the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict provisions of the GMP. The following is a detailed analysis of how the project complies with all provisions of this subdistrict: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT - Off/CEAND IN -FILL COMMERCZ4L SUBDISTRICT a. The subject site is in the Urban Mixed Use District. The project site is completely located within the Urban Mixed Use District. b. The subject site abuts a road classified as an anterial or collector on the Collier County Functional Class Map, as adopted in the Transportation Element. The subject property abuts Old US 41, which is classified as a principal arterial roadway on the Collier County 2025 Functional Classification Map. c. A rezone to commercial zoning is requested for the subject property in its entirety, up to a maximum of 12 acres. For a property greater than 12 acres in size, the balance of the property in excess of 12 acres is limited to an environmental conservation easement or open space. Under this provision, "open space" shall not include water management facilities unless said facilities are incorporated into a conservation or preservation area for the purpose of enhancement of the conservation or preservation area. The subject property will be rezoned in its entirety. The subject property totals approximately 4.6+/- acres. d. The site abuts commercial zoning. (i) On one side and that abutting commercial site is not within an infill Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District or the Urban Commercial District, or, (V) On both sides. The subject property abuts an industrial section of the Sterling Oaks PUD to the south. Per criteria M, industrial portions of PUD zoning districts are eligible to apply these provisions. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPU Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 7 e. The abutting commercial zoning may be in the unincorporated portion of Collier County or in a neighboring jurisdiction. The abutting industrial -zoned PUD is within unincorporated Collier County f. The depth of the subject property in its entirety, or up to 12 acres for parcels greater than 72 acres in size, for which cornrnercial zoning is being requested, does not exceed the depth of the commercially zoned area on the abutting parcelfs). Where the subject site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, and the depth of the commercially zoned area is not the same on both abutting parcels, the Board of County Commissioners shall have discretion in deters ining how to interpret the depth of the comvnercially zoned area which cannot be exceeded, but in no case shall the depth exceed that on the abutting property with the greatest depth of commercial area. This discretion shall be applied on a case-by-case basis. The depth of the subject properties are commensurate with the neighboring industrial -zoned PUD to the south in terms of developable area of the properties. The portions of both properties located to the west of the developable area are encumbered by an FPL easement, drainage canal, and jurisdictional wetlands, rendering these areas virtually undevelopable. These conditions are clearly shown on the proposed CPUD master plan and the approved site development plan for the industrial property per (SDP- PL20140000442) attached as Exhibit A. r) Based upon these unique site conditions, as well as the curvature of the roadway and triangular configuration of the subject parcels and adjacent industrial zoned property, it is appropriate to apply the above provision regarding depth based upon the developable area of these lands, but only where such infill sites clearly comply with the intent of the Infill Commercial Subdistrict, as is the case with this CPUD. Due to the size of the properties, character of development along the Old Us 41 roadway, and buildout of adjacent properties, lower -intensity infill commercial uses are not only the highest and best use of the subject properties, but also the only viable development option based upon the regulatory framework in place. The only other use available to the property owners is residential development. Due to the allowable densities limited by the GMP, LDC requirements for residential projects, and overall, character of the area, this development program would not be feasible. The proposed commercial uses will provide neighborhood goods and services in close proximity to existing high density residential developments and employment centers in the industrial park on the east side of Old US 41. Integrating infill commercial uses in this area will directly support sound planning principles for integrated, mixed-use land use patterns where public infrastructure and facilities exist to support new development. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests a finding of consistency with the intent of the above provision. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 7 g. Project uses are limited to office or low intensity commercial uses if the subject property abuts commercial zoning on one side only. For property abutting commercial zoning on both sides, the project uses may include those of the highest intensity abutting commercial zoning district. The subject property abuts industrially zoned portions of a PUD on one side. As outlined in the proposed PUD document, the uses are limited to the C-3 commercial district uses as well as the Catalog and Mail Order House. The C-3 commercial uses are lower intensity than the approved industrial uses on the adjacent parcel. Additionally, the most intensive uses have been sensitively located on the southern parcel adjacent to the industrial zoned lands, and away from the multi -family residential development to the north. h. The subject property in its entirety was not created to take advantage of this provision, evidenced by its creation poor to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on October 28, 1997. The subject property was not created to take advantage of this provision. i. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting one side only: (i) commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met; and, (ii) uses shall be limited so as to serve as a transitional use between the commercial zoning on one side and non-commercial zoning on the other side. v The uses have been limited to all uses within the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3) with the exception of the 7,500 SF Catalog and Mail Order House (Retail services Group 5961). This is a permitted C-3 use; however, the Applicant is proposing a 7,500 SF building, whereas the use is limited to 5,000 SF in the C-3 district. As noted above, the most intensive use based upon Chapter 2 of the LDC has been sensitively located on the southern parcel adjacent to the industrial zoned lands, and away from the multi -family residential development to the north. j. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting both sides, commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met. So noted. The subject property only abuts industrial zoning along the southern boundary. k. Lands zoned for support medical uses pursuant to the '1/4 mile support medical uses" provision in the Urban designation shall not be deemed 'commercial zoning" for purposes of this Subdistrict. So noted. The subject property is not being zoned for medical uses pursuant to this criteria. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 4 of 7 Z Land adjacent to areas zoned C- 71T on the zoning atlas maps, or other commercia/zoning obtained via the fom7er Comvnercial Under Criteria provision in the FLUE, shall not be eligible for a rezone under the Office and Infill Comirercial Subdistrict, except through aggregation as provided in Paragraphs i. and i above. The subject property is not adjacent to lands described above, and is therefore eligible to rezone under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict. in. for purposes of this Subdistrict, property abutting land zoned Industrial or Industrial PUD, abutting lands zoned for Business Park uses pursuant to the Business Pork Subdistrict, or abutting lands zoned for Research and Technology Park uses pursuant to the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict, shall also qualify for commercial zoning so long as all other criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict are met. The subject property abuts industrial zoning to the south, and the property meets all criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, as described herein. n. At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer. The subject property is located within an urbanized area of unincorporated Collier County and will be served by existing central public water and sewer. o. The project will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties. The subject property will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on the surrounding properties. The subject property serves as a transition in intensity from the existing multi -family to the north and the future industrial uses to the south. As shown on the enclosed PUD master plan, all the land west of the drainage canal and FPL easement will remain as open space. The proposed open space provides for a contiguous connection of undisturbed and undeveloped land adjacent to the existing preserve. The delineation of open space as shown on the PUD master plan allows for the commercial development on the property to occur in a clustered footprint oriented away from the existing preserve. As outlined in the proposed PUD document, the CPUD is requesting all uses found in the C-3 commercial zoning district, as well as incorporating the Catalog and Mail Order House as a use. The Catalog and Mail Order House use is very low intensity and will be wholly enclosed. There will be no commercial sales from the location, which will significantly limit trip generation by this portion of the project p. The maximum acreage eligible to be utilized for the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District is 250 acres. The subject property is 4.6+/- acres in size, and does not exceed the allowable acreage per this criteria. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPU Evaluation Criteria Page 5 of 7 In addition, the proposed CPUD is consistent with the following general policies guiding new development: FLUE Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 78, 2004, as amended). As described above, the subject property is compatible with the surrounding area through the internal clustering of the development footprint, proposed landscape buffers, and location of open space and water management areas. The commercial uses will be spatially separated through the use of buffers and setbacks from existing multi -family uses to the north. Open space, as shown on the MCP, will provide sufficient space and buffering from the proposed commercial to the existing preserve lands to the west. FLUE Policy 5.5.• Encourage the use of land presently designated for urban intensity uses before designating other areas for urban intensity uses. This shall occur by planning for the expansion of County owned and operated public facilities and services to existing lands designated for urban intensity uses, the Rural Settlement District (formerly known as North Golden Gate), and the Rural fringe Mixed Use District, before servicing new areas. The subject property is located in an appropriate area for commercial expansion due to the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict provisions outlined in the GMP, as well as urban services and facilities outlined in this application. FLUE Policy 7.7: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to conned their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Per the attached PUD Master Plan (Exhibit "C"), the CPUD will have direct access to Old US 41 Road. CONSERVATIONAND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The CPUD is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: Policy 6.7.1.: Native Preservation The site contains 1.1 7 acres of native vegetation. In accordance with the above policy, 0.1 1 7 acres of native vegetation are required for this commercial project. Pursuant to Commitment 4.A in the enclosed PUD document, the Applicant is providing on-site preservation of native vegetation to address the preserve requirements. Additionally, the native vegetation on-site is borders existing preserve to the west, which would result in a contiguous network of habitat. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 6 of 7 f 1 d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed commercial buildings will be developed under a unified design theme with appropriate interconnectivity, thereby ensuring internal compatibility. These uses will be adequately screened from surrounding properties via the proposed buffers and locations of water management infrastructure along the northern and western property lines. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The CPUD will provide 30% on-site open space in accordance with LDC through the landscape buffers, stormwater management lakes, dedicated open space, and other pervious areas demonstrated on the enclosed PUD Master Plan. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. This application demonstrates that there is adequate and available public infrastructure to service the proposed commercial intensities. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD is utilizing the provisions found in the Office and Infill Commercial Development Subdistrict of the GMP due to the infill nature of the project site. Furthermore, the project is in close proximity to urban -levels of infrastructure, and the surrounding land use pattern is compatible with the existing and future land uses. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The enclosed PUD document demonstrated conformity with the PUD regulations contained in the Land Development Code, unless a deviation has been requested and demonstrates protection of the LDC's intent for high quality development. Therefore, the project will uphold the intent of the LDC and will not negatively public health, safety or welfare. 15501 Old US 41 Road CPUD Evaluation Criteria Page 7 of 7 • ME ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ME au■ WA\\l ■4a'■■ :1v/ A, 00 "AIME : :::::r:■ gyis ■ a NwIY N.pir F6e Co®nd Nau< DMH .I.� 4' r1 U EXHIBIT A i waw / I / .E/ III a 7 f° c� J 69 • DIOIW�Npwd MltM wnar..vE tM. AtSNID M1�M) -05'00 / W ,, D.. i � 4 ;IIS; 0 i y ji�l; 0 ox PI Z Z RAIL HEAD BOULEVARD Na 2q WAYJ — -- ° Z W o�LL� aIncSmmts<mo■oxew.rs W Zv it [rmwPwaonu..wc.w..rTx � F f' Q N 9NIXDOUt000t COYWNlY V.CF O<. Ct Int SOS.M Lfl-OVQwlIAl10N.�M4■ I.aC11116 L � a NORTH ® SDP -1 SCALE I' - 30' • IN 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 EXECUTED COVENANTS OF UNIFIED CONTROL CA -r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonlyknownas 15501 OLD 41, NAPLES, FL 34110 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Commercial planned unit development (c PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Waldrop Engineering, PA. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compl' nc . The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit dev op ent and the C)unty may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all er con�,ficl safeguards of the panned unit development. Owner Owner Itimale Developments, LLC do Frank Norberto, Jr Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this "! clay of D �01_4'by � who is personally known to me or has produced as identification, 04 u lic (Name typed, printed or stamped) 2/21/2017 ;y 7,, JESSICA K. UNN Page 10 of 16 ?.; r My COMMISSION 0 FF 113421 '. EXPIRES: April 16, 2018 emded Thru ftdrd Irruuco Ap ri y 0 r) EXHIBIT A 10 48 25 S 100FT OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4, LYING W OF TRAIL .92 AC OR 1204 PG 529 f 'r CO [fer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as 1580501-041, NAPLES, FL 34110 15501 OLD 41, NAPLES, FL 34110 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Commercial planned unit development (C PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Waldrop Engineering, P.A. , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue, ermits, certificates, or licenses to cupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the Count may st6ongoing construction activity u the pro'ect drought into compliance with al erms, conditions an afgguards �theed unit developm t. � i Owner 04Aer Frank Norberto Craig Hazelett Authorized A Printed Name Printed Name nt on behalf of DGC&B LLC STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this Z�H day of 2011 by Lpith lfAzg,i.CTT whop per=rsonally known to me uced as identification. ;� ;Y'p^•., rJMBERLY BAILEY Nota P blit Notary Pudic - State of Florida Notary . ; CommistionIGG074407 (Name typed, printed stamped) My Comm. Expires May 7, 202 t (lorded through National Notary Assn. 2/21/2017 Page 10 of 16 40 • Exhibit A That portion of the South 30 feet of the North Half (N 1/2) of the North Half (N 1 /2) of the Southwest Quarter (SWI/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NEI/4) and the North 230 feet of the South Half (S 1/2) of the North Half (N1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) all in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, as lies West of U.S. Highway 41, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Property I.D. Number: 00143160001). Together with the South 100 feet of the South one-half (S 1/2) of the North one-half (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4), of the Northeast Quarter (NEI/4) of Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. • 0 IME11-11 111 ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 EXECUTED AFFIDAVITS OF AUTHORIZATION C: MA AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001083 1 Frank Norberto Jr. (print name), as Managing Member (title, If applicable) of Ultimate Developments, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Waldrop Engineering. P A to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member_" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penajItie]d of perjury,) declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts Seatin it are tru6. 12120/2017 Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on MCPJ ZDV (date) by lUT)✓[/,Ply! Tr_ (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as gDQ 1'nwho is personally known to me or who has produced F, DL-*LJ_n_I (o2(o04d03L110 (type of identifica ion) as identification. STAMP/SEAL Slgn re of Notary Public CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 �•• ()y, ••`bb. JC&WA K UNN .` MY COMMISSION i FF 113421 EXPIRES: April 18, 2019 'atir it` Bonded ThN WCAib Inswo At>mycy CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) FIL20170001083 Criag Hazelett (print name), as Title Manager (title, If applicable) of occ a B, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Waldrop Engineering. P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under p (tiesof e ' ry, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa stat =e Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on L/ I 12 17 (date) by C_"L(o (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as 4_, who is personally known to me or-wh "reduced (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL Signature f M&ary Publ' �Y KIMBERLY BAILEY NotaryPubik-State ofFlodda Commission 4 GG 074407 w My Comm. Expires May 7, 2021 Bonded through National Notary Assn. CP\08-COA-001 1 511 55 REV 3/24/14 ■ 'ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier,ov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type +_ ' _ t' C_ �' �` Z_ Dateand Time: )- / j if�vf lj +�L, Assigned Planner: Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Projel- .formation Project Name: PL #: Property ID #: Li Current Zoning: Project Address: City: State: Zip: Applicant: Agent Name: (1 c E'=`��` Phone: • �IL Agent/Firm Address: li�4": City: State: Zip: 'LjI Property Owner: ` + - Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: {`� . (_;- 1 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Coller County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet PL#- ,,I 1cc c tcS71 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email Chris Alcorn Utility Billing 821-8136 , chrisalcorn@colliergov.net David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@coil,ergov.net Steve Baluch, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net Rachel Beasley Zoning Services 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net Marcus Berman County Surveyor 252-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net i{ Heidi Ashton Cicko 1 Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ;r : Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Dale Fey North Naples Fire 597-3222 dalefey@colliergov.net Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 1 jodihughes@colliergov.net Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net i� Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM ! Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net 1 GacxQSiL- n ere Stormwater 252 ��@colliergov.net Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 j paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 1 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net 1 _ Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@coiliergov.net Jessica Huckeba CAD Technician 252-2315 JessicaHuckeba@colliergov.net Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net CAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Bill Pancake North Naples Fire 597-3222 billpancake@colliergov.net Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Edwin Sanchez Fire Review 252-7517 edwinsanchez@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning j 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 PeterShawinsky@colliergov.net Daniel Smith, AICP Zoning Services 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 EIlenSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Chad Sweet Transportation 252-5687 chadsweet@collierogv.net I— Mark Templeton Landscape 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email C Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes 44 - ll L, _ ti 1 CC C C L✓kL� V� 1 7 ti,c�itilrv( Lt>�I� r5 IZ;- :.-r��,� z�, l7-x►shk.� 1�c,���,��� v�C--'�1 \la.L+ VI -�`�t✓ Y� a C: L( �' s Co Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE J GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 V www.collierRov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes E ! Y E Goer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 _- 12 _-- ,{i�lt�.,. ,'7 0 JohnsonEric From: Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 5:12 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Lindsay Robin; Frank Norberto (frank@skim-a-round"com) Subject: RE: 20170001083 Hi Eric, Mr. Norberto is requesting the CPUD rezoning to allow for a mail order distribution business. The use will contain office space, and an open area/flex space where employees (about 5 in total) will package and ship pool supplies that are purchased from their online retail store. A Fed -Ex truck enters in the morning and delivers the items, the pool supplies and parts are re -packaged into smaller boxers, labeled and picked by Fed -Ex in the evening. In the code your Misc. Business Services, packaging and labeling, seemed to fit. However, that appears to be prohibited in C-3. Hence the need to request a CPUD that allows for C-3 uses, in addition to Business Services, packaging and labeling. That at least was our thought on this. There will be no direct sale, retail or wholesale conducted on site. There is no manufacturing or assembly on-site. Just re -packaging. We are completing our research on the depth of the neighboring mini -warehouse use and will circle back on whether this will include a small-scale GMPA to create a commercial subdistrict. Thanks again for a very informative pre -app! Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning '1t J�ENGINEERING i'::t F1y';�FRrc: e ��.}�•; Jti=il.Ff: h�`.n:^rC �iS" Direct: E: alexisc@waldropeneineering.com I C: (239) 850-8525 Office: P: (239) 405-7777 1 F: (239) 405-7899 www.waldropengineering.com NOTICE: Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. From: JohnsonEric[mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:34 PM To: Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo @waldrope ngi nee ring.com> Cc: Lindsay Robin <Lindsay.Robin @waIdropengineering.com> Subject: 20170001083 0 Alexis Please send more inYorination regarding the proposed use(s) for the site. This will help us determine the appropriate SIC category. Thanks! Respectfully. Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division — Zoning Services Section 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 (239) 252-2931 office (239)252-6503 fax U c. F onda Law. e-mail addresses are oublic reco.-ds i" ycc do --ot iNart yo.;r e-mail address released n response to a • records request do not send electronic ma l ,u t- is ent :Y Instead contact tris office by telephone or in writing. • 2 JohnsonEric From: Beard Laurie Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 140 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: SawyerMichael Subject: Pre -app this morning Eric, According to Trinity FDOT will be performing a PD&E study on Old -41, but it is still two years out before they start the study. They will be looking at expanding the road from two lanes to four lanes, and also adding a pathway on one side of the road. We don't know which side. Nothing is funded at this time for construction. Please pass this on to Alexis. Laurie Beard, Project Manager, PUD Monitoring Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, #103 Naples, FL 34104 239-252-5782 U,ider Florida Law. e-mail ad&esses are oubGc records If yr,;; c� .aant your e-rrau address released in response to a public records request CIO rnc;t surd electrow •ila l tri . -,s en! ',/ nsteac contact th,s office by telep ore or in writing. 0 CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS C F COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary E]�' ❑ Completed Application with required attachments ❑ Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 2 El Warranty Deed(s) 3 ET List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 ED ❑ , Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. S ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 4 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. 'L ❑ [� ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 4 �! ❑ Traffic Impact Study 7 Historical Survey 4 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 c Electronic copy of all required documents 2 Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %:" x 11" copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continued onto next page... 2/21/2017 Page 11 of 16 0 Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑: " ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Cf Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code El Exhibit D: Legal Description Q Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Fj j Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director LJ I Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500:00 -if PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 0 ,Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 El Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 El Transportation Review Fees: Gk Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. O Minor Study Review: $750.00 O Major Study Review $1,500.00 d Legal Advertising Fees: O CCPC: $1,125.00 O BCC: $500.00 2/21/2017 Page 12 of 16 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: O Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the S'^ and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date • 2/21/2017 Page 13 of 16 Envi Project Name PU -PUDA Checklist (non-RF.ML) �t t<J 1 i (�uJ ' • Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site andMr the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08.-4.08.00) Not in CV Library 02. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. if the site is vegetated. provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3 Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 40 Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations ( LDC 3.05.07.6-D: 3.05.07.F: 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.1-1. I .b. Preserve Width - P603 U Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3. include all 3 strata. be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7 I Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be • permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.1-1.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New /''- 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not repaired, %%hen so warranted (LDC 10.02. 2.A-2.0 —` Listed Species - P522� 9.J Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off-site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 1(.' PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A 2) Master Plan Contents -P626 l l PUD shall include Preserve Tract section Not in CV Library When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) OR A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 3. Water management as allowed by the LDC • PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Ij ) Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in • accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. D12.PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02. 1 3.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Look at cross-sections. is there any till proposed in the preserve'? 14. Additional Comments: • is ��z Environmental Data Checklist Project Name i o The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. v" 0WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3.J ldenti on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( CS) and include this information on t e or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identih on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. lIP 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis �l of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project • (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 15. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves. show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. GLS Where native vegetation is retained on site. provide a topographic map to a Wif foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. C7. Provide a wildlife survev for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in actor ante with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 08 Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9.-;-'W''ildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed S ecies are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the 1" WCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed �' �) species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens. foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overla} for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones. copies of do which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant `I to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to he cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) j� are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 1 1. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and communit} types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend foreacTof tLUZFZTS'Zo es i enU ie . Aenais ani overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the above referenced cafcuTattons�aer as sTon the SDP or final plat construction plans. Inaseparate report. demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where app Ica e, this re an genal showm the project boundaries a ong wit any u ped land, preserves, natural' flowways or other natural land features, located on—alFutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off-site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on-site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off-site parcel(s) if off-site donation of land is to occur. • Q14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, alone %% ith a narrati%e of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields. cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1.000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 1 10 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 808 1) and Resource Conservation and Recoven Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment. when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise In sea level. • �I 17 Provide justification for deviations t1rom environmental LD pro%pi ions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 03). if requested. Voj— &- (m Where applicable. provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for ' proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19 Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST). show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. AFor multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. XFor development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. �1 j '14 The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's • �/ compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 t) .# The The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: t/yw I (Choose those that apply) ; a.� Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. cc Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and 0LDC. l d Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. oe Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species.u 25. )PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones aAd CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. g2. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required`? 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: • Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and w ill be used in lieu of landscape buffers. include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape butter requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.0.07. 28. Additional comments 29. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) • co ler ca-UHty Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170001083 PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, Jon DeBlasis Additional information provided by Agent in email on March 31, 2017 from Alexis Crespo, AfCP, LEED AP at Waldrop Engineering • Name and Number of who submitted pre -app request Lindsay Robin (239)405-7777 • Agent to list for PL20170001083 Alexis Crespo • Owner of property (if Frank Norberto..or not) Frank Norberto owns 00144960006 DGC&B, LLC owns Parcel ID 00143160001 • Confirm we have this correct please: Rezone to CPUD utilizing commercial infill provisions ''es • Is there any additional information you would like us to have — specific questions that need answered or addressed so we can prepare? We are looking at a ; ange of C-2 and potentially C-3 uses. Mr. Norberto specifically wants to do a Business Services — Miscellaneous (Packaging and Labeling). DGC&B is seeking commercial uses that will be supported by the commercial infill provisions. Thanks, Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning Direct: E: alexisc'@waldropengineering.com I C: (239) 850-8525 Office: P: (239) 405-7777 1 F: (239) 405-7899 Zoning Division • 2800 Norte Harmhm Drove • Napies. Florida 34104.239.252-2400 • °a ooliagou net Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 001431600C] Site Adr. 15805 OLD 41, NAPLES, FL 34110 Name / Address DGC&B LLC 5051 TAMIAMI TRL N City NAPLES State =_ Zip 34103-2802 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated ';1 G 000100 003 3A10 10 48 25 3.69 Legal 10 48 25 S 30FT OF N1/2 OF N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4, N 230FT OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SWI/4 OF NE1/4, LYING W OF US 413.08 AC Millag_e Area O 143 Miilage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 5.703 10.953 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll Date Book -Page Amount Land Value S271,309 07/07/05 3838-2908 $ 450,000 Improved Value $ 0 12/22/95 2131-1353 $ 0 (=j Market Value $ 271,309 03/01/90 1509-2169 $ 133,000 02/01/88 1329-2088 $ 0 09/01/80 881-1413 $ 0 _ Assessed Value S 255,815 (_) School Taxable Value $ 271,309 Taxable Value $ 255,815 11 Print New SearchTax Bills Change of Address Property Summary1[ Property Detail Aerial Sketches Trim Notices Parcel No. 00143160001 Site Adr. 15805 OLD 41, NAPLES, FL 34110 'R Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00144960006 Site Adr. 15501 OLD 41, NAPLES, FL 34110 Name/ Address NORBERTO, FRANK 5930 AMBERWOOD DRIVE City NAPLES State FL Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range 3A10 000100 035 3A10 10 48 25 Paue I of 1 Zip 34110 Acres 'Estimated 0.92 Legal 10 48 25 S 100FT OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4, LYING W OF TRAIL .92 AC OR 1204 PG 529 Millage Area.0 143 Millage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 x.708 10.953 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll •Date 02/06/17 Book -Page 5362-2188 Amount $ 100,000 Land Value (+) Improved Value 02/11/14 5009-1911 so (—) Market Value 12/13/13 4992-3271 $20,000 03/16/11 4665-2435 $ 100 01/19/05 3718-1414 $ 95,000 (_) Assessed Value 08/27/02 3098-161 S 50,000 (_) School Taxable Value 04/06/00 2660-1481 $ 30,000 (_) Taxable Value 08/05/99 2578-2601 $ 0 07/01/86 1204-529 S 0 04/01/85 1133-804 $ 0 01/01/74 575-773 $ 0 • http:ll,Aww.collierappralser.comi'main_search Recorddetall.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00144960006 $60,398 So $60.398 S 56,950 $ 60,398 $ 56,950 4. 122017 Pa,c I of I • hnp://maps.collierappraiser.com/output/Collier 2017_sdeO3lO9328696776 jpg 4/12/2017 iCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergay.net Collier County ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing@colliergov net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) Fs� PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) See below. FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00144960006;00143160001 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 15501 & 15805 Old 41 Road • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) n/a PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) n/a SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # 10 48 25 S 30FT OF NV2 OF N1/2 OF SW1,4 OF NE1,4, N 230FT OF S1,'2 OF N1'2 OF SW114 OF NEt/4, LYING W OF U: 41 3.08 AC 10 48 25 S 100FT OF S1/2 OF N1!2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1 4, LYING W OF TRAIL .92 AC OR 1204 PG 529 Collier CO- my COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) n/a Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑. Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Lindsay Robin Phone: 239-405-7777 Email/Faxilindsay.robinQa waldropengineering.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by:. _ Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE . UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED ��� ENGINEERING WARRANTY DEEDS 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 3654201 OR: 3838 PG: 2908 RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUTY, FL 01/01/2005 at 02:18PN DWIGHT E. BROCB, CLBRB CONS 450000.00 RBC FBB 35.50 This Instrument Prepared By: DOC -.10 3150.00 Stephen C. Pierce, Esq. Retn: Cummings & Lockwood PICK i PECK 3001 Tamiami Trail North 5801 PELICAN BAY BLVD #103 Naples, Florida 34103 NAPLES FL 31108 2109 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this Q > day of June, 2005, between MARVIN S. PORTER, as to an undivided 1/3 interest, with a mailing address of 790 Cape View Drive, Fort Myers, FL 33919, WILLIAM N. HOROWITZ, as to an undivided 1/3 interest with a mailing address of 15529 Fiddlesticks Boulevard, Fort Myers, FL 33912 and NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FLORIDA N.A., as Trustee of the Linda H. Sweet Individual Retirement Accot � as to an undivided 1/3 interest, with a mailing address of F060 (ol (­ a /� H,-4 F , /N 4, K 339N (together, the "Grantors"), and DGC&B, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, with a mailing address of 5051 Tamiami Trail j Iooli, Iapler , 34103 (the "Grantee"). ,/& WITNESSETH: The Grantors, for and in oonsiderdidn'LVf the sum of Ten and No/ 100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable coriside;acri ;tv fFe frralAr� iri Iran ,paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledg6d by the: Graotor�, _have gta�ted, bargained and sold to the Grantee, and the Grantee's hiet`rs ,a da sigr s f0evq . the f�jlgwiag described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County,'Fforida, to -wit: - That portion of the South- feet of the North I- a1f�N172y of the North Half (N1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW I A)'4,the Northeast Quaker (NE 1/4) and the North 230 feet of the South Half (S1/2) of the'%1ort i W-(Nj�) 6f the Southwest Quarter (SWI/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NEI/4) all in -s 4b; T- wnship 48 South, Range 25 East, as lies West of U.S. Highway 41, Public Records of Collier County, Florida (Property I.D. Number: 00143160001). Subject to (i) real property taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years including assessments payable on an amortized basis; (ii) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (iii) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interest of record, if any; and (iv) restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision. The subject property is vacant land and not the homestead of any of the Grantors herein. OR: 3838 PG: 2909 The Grantors will defend the title to said land against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the Grantors, but against none other. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: WgYESS #1 v �r��-e. Sg c�cres (Print ame ofWitness) (Printed name of Witness) �*,= X�'_ (?-�Q MARVIN S. PORTER STATE OF X//-� " COUNTY OF F / The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b'efi MARVIN!� S. PORTER, who i's, _W'sonally kn "I [�►sfasidetrfifc; i, My Commission Expires: Nolory hac - fc1. 01 c rffAWon • oo �» �ad�dMNabeZNolQyArti (S TI -this �dJ day of June, 2005 by ,,to me or who has produced NOT �YJ PLJ$L (Printed Name of Notary Public) 0 WITNESS #1 _ / /'zc r/1C) : 1r- S ` (-C- l/Lie✓ (Printed name 4 Witness) W-11/vel k /�ly WILLIAM N. HOROWITZ (Printed name of Witness) R C,0 STATE OF t COUNTY OF j t1 The foregoing instrument, , WILLIAM N. HOROWITZ, ----- as My Commission Expires: OR: 3838 PG: 2910 77 Was acknowledged < €ore rxie ris day of June, 2005 by ilio,, is personally kn,io' me or _-fiar- produced tde�—�ion. Tracy K Morency MY COMMISSION # DD08401! EXPIRES ;�• February 16, 2006 /� dh•• 0. i�CfD?�+RU TRO CAIN INSU &NCE iN- �. R:• (SEAL) NOT Y PUBLIC J " I(-1)gd9 ;t,c E f (Printed Name of Notary Public) WITNESS #I � /%�� r/� ;��� S Col / !�P✓ (Printed name f Witness) (Printed name of Witness) STATE OF COUNTY OF *** OR; 3838 PG; 2911 **t NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FLORIDA N.A., as Trustee of the Linda H. Sweet Individual Retirement Account , BY: 4eflky'B. Moes Senior Vice President The foregoing instru�:*-46I�*edgd; bef Jeffrey B. Moes, Senior Vice President of Northem Must F Bank, who is personally knowp to me oF-who-has idt identifiZ ation..` -7 My Commission Expires: _ Yt... Tracy K Mcrency MY COMMISSION i DD084014 EXPIRES q_ February 14 2006 BONDED hRUTROY FAIN INSURAJ<4WC (SEAL) 2130395 l.doc 6/27/2005 W -M e'this -2t� day of June, 2005 by of Tlorida N.A., on behalf of the (Printed Name of Notary Public) INSTR 5461050 OR 5441 PG 3203 E -RECORDED 10/20/2017 9:47 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared without opinion by And return to: Patrick H. Neale, Esq. Patrick Neale and Associates PO Box 9440 Naples, FL 34101 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER ) SAM NAM *FFIDAVIT Before the undersigned Y rpersonally apt* : Pe y Bit aPPc7 Fneaiemk Norberto hereinafter Affiant), who first duly sworn Aepgse!i­andsayi::, \� 1. Frank Norberto hjs pers nal "ov 1d& d"r`4lf�tters set forth in this affidavit. 2. Frank Norberto is ,t(ie-awmet~v`fthe 5 fe impfe tiCle; "rtain real property (the Property) situated in Cotii rCounty, Florida, mdm,pac milarly described as: The South 100 feet otliebuth ons -half (S %-)of the North one-half (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW '/4) of the T fortkeaSt Quarter (NE '/4) of Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Cotl[WCounty Florida. Commonly known as 15541 Old 41, Naples FL 34110 The Affiant hereby affirms that he has been vested with title to the property since February 3, 2017. 4. The Affiant affirms that L am one and he same person who is identified by the name Francisco Norberto and also known as Frank Norberto On this tlNay of ©c -To t'jE fZ 2017, before me the undersigned, Frank Norberto, 1 of 2 Same Name Affidavit Norberto *** OR 5441 PG 3204 *** personally appeared who being first duly sworn, deposes and says that she is one and the same person as Francisco Norberto. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. r rank Norbert ci'o}xr SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this f�'D day of,EebruaLy, 2017 By Frank Norberto a/k/a Franciwo*rher ) is (check one) (__j personally known to me �or l y- 1 who produced as identification. (Notarial Seal or Stamp) �rlota Public dine: O(iy � a %z�6 `- OLnnA F GABRfEL`` y`Corrrnmissftn Expires:ZOL MY COMMISSION 0 GG096U? I� EXPIRES April 19, 2021 2 of 2 Same Name Affidavit Norberto IAI 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 LIST IDENTIFYING ALL PROPERTY OWNERS & PARTIES OF THE CORPORATION Detail by Entity Name Deparlmenl of $140 / [Awsion of %:auwalgns / Search Records ! Delad By DowmerA Number / Page 1 of 2 DvisioN OF CORPORATIONS http://search. sunbiz,org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 12/19/2017 • Detail by Entity Name NORBERTO. DENNINE 7326 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119 Annual Reports No Annual Reports Filed Document Images OhZa;?U I,L— ; I Xwa Lmded LiabiN View image in PDF format Page 2 of 2 http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 12/19/2017 Detail by Entity Name Florida Department pl Stale // 1.rg 1 . 11 1 Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company DGC & B, LLC Filing Information Document Number L05000066097 FEI/EIN Number 20-2982145 Date Filed 06/29/2005 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5051 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103 Mailing Address 5051 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103 Registered Agent Name & Address HAZELETT, CRAIG D 5051 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES, FL 34103 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR HAZELETT, GARY L 190 CAJEPUT DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34108 Title MGRM HAZELETT, CRAIG D 208 MONTEREY DR NAPLES, FL 34119 Title MGR HAZELETT, BRAD M 336 CYPRESS WAY W NAPLES, FL 34110 Page 1 of 2 http://search.sunbiz.org/lnquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 3/17/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 2 �7."oa D::,--. ,. s:— o , ,.o .. _—... http://search.sunbiz.org/lnquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetaiI?inquirytype=Entity... 3/17/2017 Title MGR LEMAY, DAVID 484 PALM RIVER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34110 Annual Reports ReportYear Filed Date 2014 04/03/2014 2015 04/29/2015 2016 04/21/2016 Document Images 0421/2016 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format D4/2912015 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/032014 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/152013 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/23/2012 — ANNUAL REPORT View imagein PDF format 04252011 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/302010 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04113:2009 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05292008 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format • 0 510 312 00 7 — ANNUAL REPORT 05/11/2006 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format View image in PDF format 062912005 — Florida Limited Liabildes View image in PDF format �7."oa D::,--. ,. s:— o , ,.o .. _—... http://search.sunbiz.org/lnquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetaiI?inquirytype=Entity... 3/17/2017 ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 BOUNDARY SURVEY 0 SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY PmpertyAddress: Certified To: 15501 Did 41 Fend redo NSPdrs, FL 34110 NO OWER PERSONOR ENniYYAYRELYON nMS SURVEY SURVEY # 18017 Flood Zone Inbanatlon: CommunMy Number 120067 Panel. 0191 Suffix. H EBechm Dat 0511612012 Fbod2bre. AEIAH 8FE, 12' N.A.VD.1988 BENCHMARK Th portion of tha South 30leef of the North Helf(IVI2) of the Nadi HW (N72) ofdw Southwest Quarter LAND SERVICES, INC. tSWl1H)olthe Northeast Querlef(NEVO)and the North 230 feet ofthe South Haif(S12) ofthe North Hoff (N72) of Ihe Southwest Ouarler (SWI14) W the NorMaasl Owrf-r (NE114) a# n Section 10, Townsh p 48 1807J. 6 C Bold—d TM. 23359(-0778 Soo81. Range 25 East, as has WestofU.S. Hyhway4l, Public Recons ofColAwr County, Flonda (Properly Nepbs,Fbrir4 34109 Fax 233591.1195I D Number 00f4310MI). Together wi/A tha South 100 feet of the SOUM one-he#(SI2) ofthe North L.B.#75W wwu•,benchmerbandservicaLmm one-he#(Nf2)ofthe SouthwestQuaner(SWI14), ofthe Northeast Quaner(NE114) afSecdonr 10.. Township 48 South, Range 25 East CoMer County, Florida. SET 112' I.R.LB7502 I i m Q SET 112' m LR. L87502 t N89°4750"E 703.48'M. FND. 518" I.R. NO t.D. xs SUBJECT PARCEL ' (VACANT) / 211310.48±Sq. Feet r 4.85±Acres / �3 r / X A S 8j'49-4 1 W 470;63' M. / FND. 4")W / CONC. MON. S.W. CORNER OF SEC. 10 L roxro• rrcw1Mar ren e wru.rrc� �.sxecexoYLrxr i •wcunmewsnexr iv�aur ��um tsar ✓xt ELYr rKleYWrrtx 1LY rt SO nos porn L.Yr rn .,re acwair�xr POINTS OF INTEREST 1 inch 80. 1L 1 NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ANY GRAPHIC SCALE DESIGN WORK. b 4 ec I hemby certify Mat A Survey of the hereon described properly was made under my direction and meets the Min—m Technical Standards as per Chapter 5J-170518 .052 F.A.C.. pursuant to section 472027 Florida Statutes. KENNETH SARRIO o e ~ O —a—— IR ar¢e � xu n eY eY:w�Ywx • I.R • row tore # wrrtar ■ evcrearuaxL'xr ® °a` � erxrexir WWGRw WM Y�xprYRKAatE wsrec r.+l xrw.vr� pxr rtwnix Al SET 875 LR. LB7502 - y POINTS OF INTEREST 1 inch 80. 1L 1 NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ANY GRAPHIC SCALE DESIGN WORK. b 4 ec I hemby certify Mat A Survey of the hereon described properly was made under my direction and meets the Min—m Technical Standards as per Chapter 5J-170518 .052 F.A.C.. pursuant to section 472027 Florida Statutes. KENNETH SARRIO o e ~ O —a—— IR ar¢e � xu n eY eY:w�Ywx • I.R • row tore # wrrtar ■ evcrearuaxL'xr ® °a` � erxrexir WWGRw WM Y�xprYRKAatE wsrec r.+l xrw.vr� pxr rtwnix ENGINEERING PROJECT AERIAL 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 V lift 1A1 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 UTILTY PROVISIONS STATEMENT AVAILABILITY LETTER Codiev County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Frank Norberto & DGC&B, LLC c/o Craig Hazelett Address: 5930 Amberwood Dr. & 5051 Tamiami Trail N. Telephone: Cell: City: Naples State: FL Fax: N/A ZIP: 34110 E -Mail Address: frank@skim-a-round.com & craig@driftwoodgardencenter.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples 15501 & 15805 Old US 41 Rd State: FL ZIP: 34110 PROPERTY INFORMA" Section/Township/Range: 10 48 25 Lot: Block: Subdivision: N/A Metes & Bounds Description: See PUD Document Exhibit D Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00144960006; 00143160001 Total Population to be Served: N/A Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 9804 GPD Average Daily: 7,263 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 7,003 GPD Average Daily: 5,188 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 2nd Quarter 2018 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSE:;_ TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 0✓ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: Collier County UtIIIt12S d. Package Treatment Plant 8 (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑✓ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System Collier Count Utilities F-1ProvideName: y d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: N/A Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 9804 GPD Average Daily: 7,263 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 7,003 GPD Average Daily: 5,188 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 2nd Quarter 2018 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N/A Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N/A Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 2/21/2017 Page 9 of 16 r) r) 15501 Old US 41 CPUD UTILITIES CALCUATION SHEET REVISED OCTOBER 2017 *Utilities Demand Estimate per Florida Administrative Code WASTEWATER DEMAND POTABLE WATER DEMAND -T Wastewater Consumption Rate ESTIMATED DAILY CONSUMPTION USES Catalog Mail Order House 7,500 SF 15 GPD/100 SF 1,125 GPD General Office 16,250 SF 15 GPD/100 SF 2,438 GPD Commercial Retail 16,250 SF 0.1 GPD/1 SF 1,625 GPD TOTAL 5,188 GPD POTABLE WATER DEMAND -T Potable Water Consumption Rate ESTIMATED DAILY CONSUMPTION USES Catalog Mail Order House 7,500 SF 21 GPD/100 SF 1,575 GPD General Office 16,250 SF 21 GPD/100 SF 3,413 GPD Commercial Retail 16,250 SF 0.14 GPD/1 SF 2,275 GPD TOTAL 7,263 GPD SUMMARY: Estimated Daily Sanitary Sewer Demand = 5,188 GPD Estimated Daily Potable Water Demand = 7,263 GPD Estimated Daily Sanitary Sewer PEAK =.7,004 GPD (5,188 GPD X 1.35 PDF = 7,004 GPD) Estimated Daily Potable Water PEAK = 9,805 GPD (7,263 GPD X 1.35 PDF = 9,805 GPD) I� ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT & FLUCCS MAP 15501 OLD US 41 CPUD Rezoning Environmental Information (August 2017) The 15501 Old US 41 CPUD project is 4.85± acres in size. The majority of this site is dominated by exotics in both the canopy and midstory. A portion of the southeastern corner of the site has been recently filled. The western portion of the site is bisected by a canal and powerline. The forested wetlands west of the powerline are adjacent to existing off-site wetland preservation areas. There is currently 1.17± acres of native vegetation (as defined by Collier County LDC Section 3.05.07.A.1) on the property. This consists of Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) Code 617E2 as shown on the attached Vegetation Map. Based on a review of historic aerials and information contained in an April 2014 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Wetland Determination (partial copy attached), the 0.38 acre area mapped as FLUCCS Code 743 was not native vegetation (i.e. melaleuca dominated canopy/midstory with saw palmetto ground cover) prior to being cleared. The Please see the attached Protected Species Assessment for a discussion of the current site conditions. Craig M. Smith of W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Inc. prepared the Protected Species Assessment. Mr. Smith has been employed as a full time environmental consultant in southwest Florida since 1987. A copy of his credentials is attached. YADRI FT -1 \County Zoning Info.Docx J J J SECT k 10 15501 Old US 41 CPUD ToWONIP 49 s R4AKGE 25 E Notes: 1. Property boundary provided by Benchmark Land Services, Inc. 2. Mapping based on photointerpretation of 2017 aerial photography and ground truthing in May 2017 J. Delineation of jurisdictional wetlands is preliminary and subject to field review/approval by applicable regulatory agencies. Vegetation Map 0 50 100 SCALE FEET FLUCCS Description Acreage 424 Melaleuca 0.47 ac. 511 Canal 0.18 ac. 617E2* Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 1.17 ac. 619 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 2.35 ac. 743 Spoil Areas 0.38 ac. 832 Electrical Power Transmission Lines 0.30 ac. Total 4.85 ac. * Native Vegetation per Collier County LDC Section 3.05.07.A.1 PERMIT USE ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION May 18, 2017 4:06:05 Drawing: DRIFTIPL," W. DEXTER BENDER & ASSO CIA TES, INC. ENYIRON.VENTAL & .VARZNE CONSULTING FORT WYERS 239-334-3680 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUBMERGED LANDS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROGRAM • SITE SURVEY REPORT FILE NUMBER: 11-0325441-001 APPLICANT: Uzupes, Vanessa SITE ADDRESS: No site address FOLIO NUMBER: 00144960006 DETERMINATION: Wetlands PROJECT/ ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION: The subject property is currently undeveloped. DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL PROJECT/ACTIVITY AREA: The subject property is a 0.92 acre parcel in North Naples. The site is bordered by Old US 41 to the west, undeveloped parcels to the north and south, and Sterling Oaks Community Association and Club to the west. A ditch and upland utility easement transect the property from north to south. BIOPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SPECIFIC PROJECT/ACTIVITY SITE: The site is wetlands and uplands east of the utility easement. The uplands portion historically most closely resembles a historical FLUCCS 411 Pine Flatwoods community. Invasive exotic infestation began between 1985 and 1995. The site east of the utility right-of-way is 99% Melaleuca. The wetlands portion west of the utility right-of-way historically resembles a 617 Mixed Wetland Hardwood community. The portion east of the utility easement most closely resembles a 625 Hydric Pine Flatwoods community. Uplands, East of the richt-of-way: .� The canopy consists of Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC). The subcanopy consists of Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC). The ground cover consists of Saw Palmetto (Serena repens, UP) and Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC). The Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) lists the soils on this portion of the parcel as Immokalee Fine Sand which typically do not support wetlands. Pursuant to the definition set forth in Chapter 62-340.200(19), F.A.C., particularly as it relates to the prevalence of vegetation adapted to saturated soils, and Chapter 62-340.300, F.A.C. this portion of the subject parcel was determined to be uplands. Wetlands. East of the right-of-way: The canopy consists of Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC) and a couple of Cabbage Palms (Sabal palmetto, FAC). The subcanopy consists of Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC). The ground cover consists of Melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenerivia, EXOTIC). The hydrological indicators of hummocking and water marks were observed. Two soil plugs were taken at the lower elevations of the property. The first one revealed no stripping within the first 6" of the soil profile. The second revealed mild stripping at 5" below the surface. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) lists the soils on this portion of the parcel as Immokalee Fine Sand which typically do not support wetlands. This portion of the parcel meets the B -Test requirements for wetlands under the guidelines provided by Chapter 62-340, F.A.0 Uzupes Vanessa - Wetlands Determination 11-0325441-001 Page 1 15501 OLD US 41 CPUD Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Protected Species Assessment August 2017 Prepared by: W. Dexter Bender & Associates, Inc. 4470 Camino Real Way, Suite 101 Fort Myers, FL 33966 (239) 334-3680 INTRODUCTION The 4.85± acre project is located within a portion of Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The parcel is bordered to the north by residential development, to the east by Old 41, to the south by undeveloped lands, to the west by an existing wetland conservation area. SITE CONDITIONS The majority of this site is dominated by exotics the site has been recently filled. The western and powerline. VEGETATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS . A portion of the southeastern corner of portion of the site is bisected by a canal The predominant vegetation associations were mapped in the field on 2017 digital 1" =100' scale aerial photography. The approximate property boundary was obtained from Benchmark Land Services, Inc. and inserted into the digital aerial. Six vegetation associations were identified using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). Figure 1 depicts the approximate location and configuration of these vegetation associations and Table 1 summarizes the acreages by FLUCCS Code. A brief description of each FLUCCS Code is also provided below. Table 1. Acrea a Summary by FLUCCS Code FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 424 Melaleuca 0.47 511 Canal 0.18 617E2 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 — 50%) 1.17 619 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 2.35 743 Spoil Areas 0.38 832 Electrical Power Transmission Lines 0.30 Total 4.85 FLUCCS Code 424, Melaleuca The portion of the property located adjacent to Old 41 is dominated by melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia). Scattered Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) are also present in the midstory. The ground cover consists primarily of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens). FLUCCS Code 511, Canal A regularly maintained canal is present in the western portion of the site. At the time of the site inspection the canal was vegetated by scattered marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle J J J SEC7M 10 15501 O/d US 41 CPUD ToM&W. Qs S RANGE 25 E Notes: 1. Property boundary provided by Benchmark Land Services, Inc. 2. Mapping based on photointerpretotion of 2017 aerial photography and ground truthing in May 2017. J. Delineation of jurisdictional wetlands is preliminary and subject to field review/approval by applicable regulatory agencies. im" I,� 77h, FLUCCS Description 0 50 100 SCALE FEET 424 Melaleuca 511 Canal 617E2 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26-50%) 619 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods 743 Spoil Areas 832 Electrical Power Transmission Lines Total Acreage 0.47 ac. 0.18 ac. 1.17 ac. 2.35 ac. 0.38 ac. 0.30 ac. 4.85 ac. PERMIT USE ONLY, NDrawwiOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Mor �g: D 4:06:05 ng: DRIFTIPLJIP W. DEXTER BENDER Figure 1. Protected Species Assessment Map & ASSO CIA TES, INC. ENYIRONA(ENT4L & ACARINE CONSULTINC FORT A(YERS 239-334-3680 umbellate), torpedo grass (Panicum repens), spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), flatsedges (Cyperus spp.). No standing water was present. FLUCCS Code 617, Mixed Wetland Hardwoods Invaded by Exotics (26 — 50%) The property west of the powerline is a forested wetland dominated by red maple (Acer rubrum), willow (Salix caroliniana), and cypress (Taxodium sp.). Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), wax myrtle, and primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana) are common shrubs. Ground cover consists of species such as swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), climbing hemp weed (Mikania scandens), frog fruit (Phyla nodiflora), arrowhead (Sagittaria sp.), and cattail (Typha sp.). Exotics, such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and java plum (Syzygium cumini), are also common. FLUCCS Code 619, Exotic Wetland Hardwoods The majority of the property east of the powerline is a wetland dominated by melaleuca. Scattered wax myrtle, cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), and cabbage palm (Saba) palmetto) are present in the midstory. Ground cover consists primarily of bare ground and patches of swamp fern, coinwort (Centella asiatica), saw palmetto, and leather fern (Acrostichum sp.). It appears that a portion of this area was burned by a severe wildfire in the past. FLUCCS Code 743, Spoil Areas A small area in the southeast corner of the property has been cleared and filled within the past two years. The area contains spoil piles as well are metal beams. Scattered weedy upland species such as smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), rustweed (Polypremum procumbens), and Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) are also present. This area was dominated by melaleuca prior to clearing. FLUCCS Code 832, Electrical Power Transmission Lines A powerline is present along the west side of the canal. The filled road is also used to maintain the canal. This area is regularly mowed and is vegetated by ragweed, grape vine (Vitis sp.), and pusley (Richardia sp.). SURVEY METHOD Based on the general habitat types (FLUCCS Codes) identified on-site there is a very low potential for a limited number of species listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to potentially occur on the subject parcel. These species include gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais coupen), a variety of wading birds, Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and the Florida bonneted -bat (Eumops floridanus). The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which has been delisted by the FWC and FWS, is still protected by other regulations and was therefore included in the survey. The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), delisted in 2012, is still protected by the Florida Black Bear Management Plan and was therefore included in the survey. Please see Table 2 for additional listed species included 3 in the survey. In addition, per Collier County regulations three species of orchids (Cyrtopodium punctatum, Encyclia cochleata, and E. tampensis) and four species of wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculate, T. utriculata, T. balbisiana, and T. flexuosa) which could potentially occur on-site were included in the survey. In order to comply with FWC/FWS survey methodology guidelines, each habitat type was surveyed for the occurrence of the species listed above using meandering pedestrian belt transects. The meandering pedestrian belt transects were spaced approximately 40 feet apart. The approximate location of direct sighting or sign (such as tracks, nests, and droppings) of a listed species, when observed, was denoted on the aerial photography. The 1" = 100' scale aerial Protected Species Assessment map (Figure 1) depicts the approximate location of the survey transects and the results of the survey. The listed species survey was conducted during the mid-day hours of May 17, 2017. The weather at the time of the survey was warm and sunny with a light breeze. Prior to conducting the protected species survey, a search of the FWC listed species database (updated in June 2016) was conducted to determine the known occurrence of listed species in the project area. This search revealed no known protected species occurring on or immediately adjacent to the site. The database indicated that Florida black bear have not been recorded within 2,500± feet of the property. The property is within a wood stork core foraging area but not within the panther Priority 1 or 2 zones. Table 2. Listed Species That Could Potentiallv Occur On-site FLUCCS Percent CODE Survey Species Name Present Absent Coverage 424 80 Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corgis v' coupes) Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) J Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger �l avicennia) 511 80 American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) �l Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) �l Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja) �l Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) �l 617E2 80 Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor) 619 80 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia 743 80 Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) 832 80 Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) SURVEY RESULTS No species listed by either the FWS or the FWC were observed on the site during the protected species survey. No potential cavities that could be utilized by the Florida bonneted -bat were observed. None of the orchids or wild -pines listed by Collier County were observed. In addition to the site inspection, a search of the FWC species database (updated in June 2016) revealed no known protected species within or immediately adjacent to the project limits. This is consistent with the poor overall quality of the habitats on-site. YADRIFT-1\PSA.docx Craig M. Smith, Senior Ecologist Current Responsibilities Project Manager providing an array of environmental studies and services related to land development and property evaluation in south Florida. These activities, performed for private landowners and public entities, include vegetation mapping, binding and informal state and federal wetland jurisdictional determinations, wetland functional assessments using UMAM, WRAP. and MWRAP, habitat evaluations, establishing seasonal high water elevations for wetlands using biological indicators, threatened and endangered species surveys, and wetland (COE. DEP, and WMD) permit applications. Additional services include threatened and endangered species relocation and management plans, wetland mitigation (creation, restoration, enhancement, and preservation) plans, and the design and implementation of wetland monitoring plans. Experience Joined the firm in 2003 bringing over 16 years of experience as an environmental consultant in South Florida. More than 274,000 acres of land has been mapped and evaluated since 1987. Individual properties ranged in size from less than one acre to more than 5,000 acres located in Collier. Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Polk, Hardee, Brevard, Martin, and Dade Counties. Projects have included agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, new and expanding roadways, and wetland restoration (wetland mitigation banking). Wetland permitting experience includes wetland delineation, preparation of state and federal permit applications and supporting documents, responding to agency questions and third party concerns, and negotiating mutually acceptable wetland mitigation plans. Surveys and management plans have been conducted and prepared for gopher tortoises, eastern indigo snake, bald eagle, red - cockaded woodpecker, Florida bonneted bat, and Big Cypress fox squirrel. Has authorization from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to conduct surveys, prepare permit applications, and relocate gopher tortoises as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent. Is qualified as an expert witness by the Lee County Hearing Examiner, Collier County Environmental Advisory Council, Collier County Planning Commission, and City of Bonita Springs Zoning Board on environmental issues. Recently completed and ongoing projects for the public and private sectors include monitoring of the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project's (LASIP) Serenity Park, wetland enhancement plan development, implementation, and monitoring for projects such as Barrington Cove, Marsilea, and Verona Pointe Estates, gopher tortoise permitting and relocation for several projects in Collier and Lee Counties, wetland permitting for Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club and Estero Crossing, and bald eagle management plan preparation for the Calusa Cay CPD on Pine Island. Education and Certification Master of Science, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 1987. Bachelor of Science, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 1984. Senior Ecologist, Ecological Society of America Professional Wetland Scientist (No. 238), Society of Wetland Scientists Certified Arborist (No. FL -6255A), International Society of Arboriculture Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent (Permit No. GTA -09-00011 E), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Qualified Bald Eagle Monitor, City of Cape Coral Provisionally Certified Wetland Delineator, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Certification Program, 1993. Continuing Education Florida Master Naturalist Program — Freshwater Wetlands. University of Florida IFAS, 2012. E ) Native Trees, Shrubs, and wildflowers for Central and South Florida: Zones 9-11. Florida Association of Native Nurseries. 2011. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method 201 Training. South Florida Water Management District. 2010. Florida Statewide (62-340 FAC) Wetland Delineation Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Wetland Plant Identification Training Program. Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. 2007. Unified Mitigation Assessment Method Training. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2005. The Florida Master Wildlifer. University of Florida. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. 2003. Basic Prescribed Fire Training. Hillsborough Community College. 1992. Florida Wetlands Successful Creation, Restoration, and Enhancement Training Course #1. Natural Resources Training and Certification, Inc. 1991. Florida Hydric Soils Workshop. Florida Association of Professional Soil Classifiers. 1991. Affiliations Ecological Society of America Society of Wetland Scientists IA] 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT LIM v TPODIICOCN planning •enpineerin0 Traffic Impact Statement 15501 Old 41 Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Collier County, Florida 08/11/2017 Prepared for: Waldrop Engineering 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Phone: 239-405-7777 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Major Study — $1,500.00 Fee 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. %•�p,N J . ..... F'' , n 2 : No 47116 '. it �'.•_ STATE OF : JJ Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 2 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 r1 Table of Contents 1�1 ProjectDescription.............................................................................................................. 4 TripGeneration...................................................................................................................5 Trip Distribution and Assignment........................................................................................6 BackgroundTraffic...............................................................................................................9 Existing and Future Roadway Network.............................................................................10 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis................................................10 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis..........................................................................................12 ImprovementAnalysis.......................................................................................................13 Mitigationof Impact..........................................................................................................14 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan...............................................................................15 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).......................................17 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition ............................................... 23 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibit.........................................................................28 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA � a ; e 13 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS— August 2017 Project Description The 15501 Old 41 project is a proposed commercial/retail development located on Old 41 Road just north of the intersection of Old 41 Road and Railhead Boulevard, within Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in northern Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1— Project location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1— Project Location Map ••n-. ate• PROJECT Go gle The property is currently vacant land. The subject site consists of 2 parcels totaling approximately 4.6 acres in total size and is currently zoned as Agriculture ("A"). The project plans to rezone the existing parcels to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to allow for a 7,500 sf mail- order house, 16,250 sf of specialty retail and 16,250 sf of general office. This analysis will classify the mail-order house as specialty retail for traffic generation purposes. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build -out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2022 planning horizon. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The development program is illustrated in Table 1. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 14 • n 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Development Mail-order house Miscellaneous Retail Office Table 1 Development Program ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code Specialty Retail A 826 - — — Specialty Retail 826 Total Size 7,500 sf 16,250 sf General Office 710 16,250 sf A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on May 12, 2017 via email (ref. Appendix 6: Initial Meeting Checklist). Connection to subject project is proposed via a full access drive onto southbound Old 41 Road. Trip Generation The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Tripi Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The software program OTISS — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (most current version) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. The proposed CPUD traffic generation provides internal capture trips consistent with ITE and Collier County guidelines and procedures. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass -by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass -by trips are not deducted for operational -access analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Pass -by rates are considered consistent with ITE and Collier County TIS guidelines and procedures. In addition, proposed weekday AM peak hour pass -by rates are considered to match the weekday PM peak hour pass -by rates. The proposed CPUD development trip generation is illustrated in Table 2. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - _ _ j 1 5 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS— August 2017 a� Table 2 Trip Generation (Proposed CPUD Development) - Average Weekday Development L4 hour iwo- AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Way Volume Land Use 1 Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total General Office _ 16,250 sf Building 330 40 5 45 16 81 97 Specialty Retail 23,750 sf 1,053 78 84 89 162 207 67 83 52 133 119 216 Total 1,383 N/A* 118 ! 3 Internal Capture 3 86 6 201 66 77 127 12 204 Total External _ 1,383 158 1,225 115 19 96 Pass -by 21 40 16 61 12 115 28 176 Net External 65 161 Note: *ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition does not have internal capture rates available for weekday traffic In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2016 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is ... analyzed based on projected PM peak hour Net External traffic generated by the proposed SDP project. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the Total External trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (as shown in Table 2). Trip Distribution and Assignment The new traffic generated by the 15501 Old 41 project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 16 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 3 a =' a 1 7 Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Collier Distribution of PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* 1 Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location Link No. Project Traffic Enter Exit Old US 41 (CR 887) 62.0 South of project to US 41 50% NB -31 SB -58 Old US 41 North of project to Lee (CR 887) 62.0 - County Line 50% SB -30 NB -57 US 41 (Tamisiami 98.0 Old 41 Rd to Lee County 20% SB -12 NB - 23 Trail) Line - -- - - US 41 (Tamiami 99.0 Wiggins Pass Rd to 30% NB -19 SB -35 Trail) Immokalee Rd Old US 41 N/A Lee County Line to Bonita 50% NB -30 SB -57 (CR 887) ** Beach Rd Old US 41 1 (CR 887) N/A North of Bonita Beach Rd 10% NB -6 SB -11 - Bonita Beach - - -- - - -- � Rd** N/A US 41 to Old 41 Rd 20% EB -12 WB - 23 Bonita Beach Rd** N/A Old 41 Rd to Imperial St 20% WB -12 EB - 23 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. **Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 3 a =' a 1 7 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS - August 2017 Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour 10% ABSORPTION <-> > N 20% 20% 50% - 20 PROJECT]' 50% PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENTAGE `' ENTER -12 � ENTER -12 ( EXIT -23) (EXIT -23) ENTER -12 (EXIT -23) ENTER -19 (EXIT -35) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA N ENTER -30 (EXIT -57) PROJECT ENTER -31 (EXIT -58) PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PM PEAK HOUR U U 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS - August 2017 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 through 2016), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2016 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2022. Table 4 n Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA D a g - 19 Background Traffic without Project (2016 - 2022) 2022 Projected 2022 2016 AUIR Projected Pk Hr Peak Dir Projected Pk CC Pk Hr, Pk Traffic Background Hr, Peak Dir Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Background Link Link Location Background Growth Factor w/out Project Bank Traffic ID # Traffic Rate (trips/hr) Volume Volume (%/yr)* Growth w/out Project (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip Factor** Bank*** Old US 41 South of project ^ 1 (CR 887) 62.0 to US 41 960 o 2.0% 1.1262 1.081 11 971 North of project Old US 41 (CR 887) 62.0 to Lee County 960 2.0% 1.1262 1,081 11 971 Line US 41 Old 41 Rd to Lee (Tamiami 98.0 1,990 2.0% 1.1262 2,241 133 2,123 Trail) County Line US 41 Wiggins Pass Rd (Tamiami 99.0 to Immokalee 2,560 2.0% 1.1262 2,883 55 2,615 Trail) Rd Bonita — Beach N/A US41toOld 41 1,167 2.0% 1.1262 1.314 N/A N/A Rd**** Rd Bonita Old 41 Rd to Beach N/A 2,304 2.0% 1.1262 2,595 N/A N/A Imperial St Rd**** Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2016 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2022 Projected Volume= 2016 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2022 Projected Volume= 2016 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2022 Peak Hour - Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. ****Data obtained from Lee County 2016 Concurrency Report and Lee County 2016 Traffic Count Report. n Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA D a g - 19 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS — August 2017 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2016 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5 -Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2016 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2022). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 10 Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Exist Peak Dir, Future Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Min. St rd Peak Hr Project Link ID # Location Roadway Capacity Build out LOS Volume Roadway Old US 41 South of project (CR 887) 62.0 to US 41 2U D 1,000 (NB) 2U Old US 41 North of project (CR 887) 62.0 to Lee County 2U D 1,000 (NB) 2U Line U5 41 — -- - --- - (Tamiami 98.0 Old tLee 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Trail) County Line US 41 (Tamiami 99.0 ss s Wiggins PasRd 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Trail) to Immoka Rd Bonita Beach NSA US 41 to Old 41 4D E 1,820 (EB) 4D Rd* Rd Bonita Beach NSA Old 41 Rd to 6D E 2,740 (EB) 6D Rd* Imperial St Note(s): 21J = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4 -lane, 6 -lane, 8 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. *Not a Collier County monitored roadway. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2022). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 10 r) 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does create a significant impact on Old 41 Road. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Based on the data contained within the 2016 AUIR, the Old 41 Road link from US 41 to the Lee County Line (AUIR Link ID #62.0) is shown to operate with a LOS deficiency in 2016, under background conditions. All other links analyzed are projected to operate above the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2022 future build -out conditions. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2022 Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2022 Projected Volume= 2022 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. As illustrated in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 6.02.02 — M.2., once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA � .. 2 = 1 11 CC 2016 Roadway Link Peak 2022 Peak Dir % Vol Min LOS Min LOS AUIR Peak Dir � Roadway Dir, Peak Peak Hr Capacity exceeded exceeded Roadway Link Link Peak Hr Link Location Hr (Project Volume Impact without with ID # Capacity Vol w/Project by Project? Project? Volume Added)* ** Project Yes No / Yes/No South of _ �F Old 887 62.0 project to US 00 NB -31 1,112 3.1% Yes Yes 41 Old US 41 North of 1 000 (CR 887) 62.0 - project to Lee (Ng) NB 57 1,138 5.7% Yes Yes County Line Old 41 Rd to 3,100 US 41(Tamiami Trail) 98.0 Lee County (Ng) NB — 23 2,264 0.74% No No Line Wiggins Pass US 41 (Tamiami Rd to 3,100 Trail) 99.0 Immokalee (Ng) NB — 19 2,902 0.61% No No Rd Bonita Beach Rd N/A US 41 to Old 1,820 EB —12 1,326 0.66% No No 41 Rd (EB) Bonita Beach Rd N/A Old 41 Rd to 2,740 EB —23 2,618 0.84% No No Imperial St (EB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2022 Projected Volume= 2022 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. As illustrated in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 6.02.02 — M.2., once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA � .. 2 = 1 11 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS - August 2017 Collier County TIS criterion, the development's impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. The analyzed Old 41 Road link is within the Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). The TCMAs designation is provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element. In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2016 AUIR, the Northwest TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 100.0%. Old US 41 Road is a Collier County designated hurricane evacuation route as depicted in Collier County Transportation Element — Map TR - 7. Based on the information contained within the Transportation Element Policy 5.8(d), no impact will be de minimus if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. In summary, based on the results of this report, the Old US 41 Road roadway segment from Lee County Line to US 41, is expected to go deficient at future 2022 build -out conditions, and the Northwest TCMA contains sufficient capacity to maintain minimum 85% threshold of its lane miles at or above the LOS standard described in the Collier County Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4. As stated in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) 6.02.02 L. 5., in order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new commercial development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least 2 of the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicable that are listed within that section. The selection of specific TDM strategies will be considered at the time of a future SDP/PPL application. The Developer may be required to assist the County with potential capacity/operational improvements that would provide sufficient capacity along this segment of Old 41. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via a proposed full access drive onto southbound Old 41 Road. For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA = . 4 -- 1 12 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS -August 2017 Old 41 Road is a 2 -lane rural un -divided arterial under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on FDOT Index 301, design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions —the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Project access is evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-of-way Manual: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; and (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two -minute period for left -turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet. Projected turning traffic movements are illustrated in Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Main Site Entrance — Old 41 Road A dedicated southbound right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the volume criteria. The proposed project is expected to generate 57 and 38vph right -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 210 feet long (which includes a minimum of 25 feet of storage). As such, a 210 foot right -turn lane is recommended to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A dedicated northbound left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the volume criteria. The proposed project is expected to generate 58 and 39vph left -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 235 feet long (which includes a minimum of 50 feet of storage). As such, a 235 foot left -turn lane is recommended to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements, as applicable. Improvement Analysis Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project is a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. The Northwest TCMA contains sufficient capacity to remain below the 85% capacity threshold (as shown in Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 13 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS -August 2017 Based on the data contained within the 2016 AUIR, the Old 41 Road link from US 41 to the Lee County Line (AUIR Link ID #62.0) is shown to operate with a LOS deficiency in 2022, under background conditions. Consistent with the site access turn lane analysis results, site related turn lane improvements are recommended to accommodate traffic at build -out conditions. Per Collier County Right-of-way (ROW) Handbook Guidelines, if existing ROW is utilized for site related turn lane improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. wn n Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - , ; 1 14 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - 1 15 U O m 0) Q F- z w O w Y W 0a ZOI iii w U)) -n W �- : n ou)rri 0)a -jag c O c Z F- R F- z �2 c LL °IV w FUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING: PUD (ARBOR LAKES) EXISTING LAND USE: MULTI - FAMILY 15' TYPE "B" BUFFER CPUD BOUNDARY (PROPERTY BOUNDARY) NO BUFFER REQUIRED PARCEL "A" PARKING 1' AREA INTERNAL. TRACT LINE i — O I ° 100' COMMERCIAL PARCEL "B" F' BUILDING 7,500 SF PARKING AREA rp D0 F m N$ 1 CPUD BOUNDARY (PROPERTY BOUNDARY) 15' TYPE "D" ROW BUFFER FUTURE LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING: I EXISTING LAND USE, WAREHOUSE, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL -- -- - - - - - -15TYPE „D" NO BUFFER REQUIRED ROW BUFFER FUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING: PUD (STERLING OAKS) EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT INDUSTRIAL 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER r I I I I I LEGEND MANAGEMENT z 1 Z 1101 DETENTI.N) PROPOSED BUILDING W PRESERVE FPL EASEMENT OOJ VEHICULARACCESS Q O2 J w Q LL zi w w zOa I Boa I I u'Sao PARCEL "A" PARKING 1' AREA INTERNAL. TRACT LINE i — O I ° 100' COMMERCIAL PARCEL "B" F' BUILDING 7,500 SF PARKING AREA rp D0 F m N$ 1 CPUD BOUNDARY (PROPERTY BOUNDARY) 15' TYPE "D" ROW BUFFER FUTURE LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING: I EXISTING LAND USE, WAREHOUSE, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL -- -- - - - - - -15TYPE „D" NO BUFFER REQUIRED ROW BUFFER FUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING: PUD (STERLING OAKS) EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT INDUSTRIAL 10' TYPE "A" BUFFER r LEGEND MANAGEMENT 1101 DETENTI.N) PROPOSED BUILDING PRESERVE FPL EASEMENT VEHICULARACCESS Ln Ln R O a to Ll A I.+ v C a �i a c c N, 0 14 V 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS— August 2017 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (5 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA D = - 1 17 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS — August 2017 • INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: May 12, 2017 Time: N A Location: N/A - Via Email People Attending: Name. Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sax% er, Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) CCi rian Malaescu, TCS Study Preparer• Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP. PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202, Naples, Fl. 34110: ah 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): • Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Transportation Planning Department Ph: 239-252-2926 Applicant' Applicant's Name: Waldrop Engineering Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Naples, FL 34135 Telephone Number: 239-405-7777 Proposed Development: Name: 15501 Old 41 CPUD - Rezone Location: On the west side of Old 41, approximately 450' north of Railhead Boulevard in northern Collier County (Refer to Fie, 1). Land Use Type: Connnereial, ce Retail ITE Code #: LUC 710, LLC 826 Description: Proposed 12.500 sf general office building. 7.500 sf mail-order business and 12,500 sf specialty retail. For the purposes of this analysis. the 7.500 sf mail order business will be represented as specialty retail. Zoning Existing: A - Agricultural Comprehensive plan recommendation: No change Page 1 of 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 118 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Requested: Rezone — CPUD Fig.1 —Project Location Map I PROJECT Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study type: Since estimated project net new traffic volume is greater than 100 AM or PM 2 -way peak hour trips, this studv qualifies for a MaiorTIS — significant operational or roadway irrmacts or work within the county right-of-way. The TIS will include AM -PM peak hour trip P-eneration. traffic distribution and assignments_ significance test (based on 2%/2%3% criterion) and roadway link analysis. Roadway link analvsis is determined based on estimated net PM peak hour traffic. Site Access Analysis — Site operational analysis to be performed at future SDP application. Internal capture and pass -by rates are considered based on ITE and Collier County guidelines recommendations. Study Type: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Maio TIS El Study Area: Boundaries: East — Old 41. Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2022 Planning Horizon Year: 2022 Page 2 of 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - 1 19 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Analysis Time Period(s): Concurrency — Weekday PM Peak Hour, Operational —N/A Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE 9°i Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N!A Pass -by trips: Per ITE, CC TIS Guidelines Internal trips: Per ITE, CC TIS Guidelines Transit use: NiA Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadwav Network Improvements: 2022 Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2016 ALTIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE 9°i Edition Trip distribution method: Empirical Engineer's Estimate — refer to Fin 2 Traffic assignment method: proiect trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning movement assignment: N/A Fig. 2 — Project Trip Distribution by Percentage Q N 5096 PROJECT 50% ,'... y._,C, Page 3 of 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 20 (a 15501 Old 41 - CPUD TIS- August 2017 1 I Special Features: from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: g' N/A— Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MVITCD I Signal system location & progression needs: N_A On-site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2016 AUIIL CC Traffic Counts Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N_A I Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: NIA Small Scali StudN - No Nee Minor Studv - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X I Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees will be agreed to during the blethodologr meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. I SIGNATURES Nor"vi, TrebUaodz Study Preparer—Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s ) Applicant Page 4 of 5 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA = -r 121 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s). distribution. assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approvaUcomments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Studv" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one suMciencv reviewl Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation. distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency reyiew) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site. confirmation of trip generation, distribution. and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed i improvements, review of traffic volume data eollectediassembled. review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Major Studv Review" - $1.500 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two suffrciencv j • reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site. confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements. review of traffic volume data collected assembled. review of traffic growth analysis, review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation. neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" commentsiquestions and or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 5 of 5 -- ----------------- - - -,.- - - --- -- -- - -_ _.._-I is Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 122 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (4 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA = a ; , 1 23 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 1017 i Project Name: 15501 Old 41 - CPU No: Date: 8ASIM 7 City: State/Province: ZIWPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: EtKion: ITE-TGM 9th Eoltion i WEEKD ae AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Ext 710 - General Office BWI6ng 16.25 165 165 40 5 16 81 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intemal 0 0 2 1 1 5 Passby 0 0 0 0 0 0 Man-passby 165 165 38 4 15 76 826 - Specialty Retail Center 2375 527 526 78 84 67 52 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 1 2 5 1 Passby 79 79 19 21 16 12 Non-passby 448 447 58 61 46 39 Total 692 891 118 89 83 133 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total internal 0 0 3 3 6 6 Total Pass -by 79 79 19 21 16 12 Total Non -pass -by 613 812 96 65 61 115 01 I,u, Sq Few 3,o" is 0 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - 124 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the independent Variable Time Period. and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis To record any notes. click Add Notes above PROJECT NAME. 15501 OLD 41 - CPL D ANAL ISIS NAME. Weekday LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE S17 -E TIME PERIOD I METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL O 710 - General Office Building 1000 Sq. Feet Gros, -1 16.25 Weekday ] Rest 165 165 330 Fit BOG) -+-3.-68 O, 826 - Specialty Retail Center1000 Sq. Feet Grose 23.75 Weekday vJ Average 527' 526' 1053'` — — 44.32 101 Indicates small sample size. use carefulty TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS INTERNAL TRIPS I EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass -by Trips for each Land Use The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section To record any notes click , Add Notes above The W Icon preceding the Pass -by% value Indicates data provided by ITE Clicking the Icon changes a custom Pass -by% value to data provided by ITE '. SAND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASSBYI,6 PASS -BY TRIPS NON -PASS -BY TRIPS 710 - General Office Building 330 0 % 0 330 826 - Specialty Retail Center 1053 15 % 158 895 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 25 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis- To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME 1%01 OLD at - CPUD ANALYSIS NAME AM Peak Flour T ,IZE TIME PERIOD METHOD Ef1TRY EXIT TOTAL LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE 0. 710 - General Office Building 1000 _ ay. — Ft (LOG) vJ Sq. Feet Gros,. 16.25 Vlkelcd . A.M. Pee Best 40 5 45 I - Ln(T) = 0.8Ln(X) + 1 57 826 - Specialty Retail Center 1000 Sq. Feet Gros, vJ 23.75 VW&day. A.M Pea v1 Average vJ 711 84 16 684 (0) indicates small sample size Jse rarefuliy TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS INTERNAL TRIPS I Specify the percentage of trips that occur between the Land Use on the left and the Land Use on the right. The table below displays the total number of trips that have been reduced from a particular Land Use. The total number of Internal Trips for each Land Use will be deducted from the adjusted Entry Trips and Exit Trips from the previous section. To record any notes, click the icon above. For recommended values see the ITE Handbook or NCHRP 684. 710 - General Office Building 826 - Specialty Retail Center Exit 5 Demand Exit 28 % (1) Balanced 1 Demand Entry 32 % 125) Entry 78 Entry 40 Demand Entry 4 - % (2) Balanced: 2 Demand Exit 29 % (24) Exit 84 _ - - -— ----------- -- ---------------- INTERNAL TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS 828 -Specialty Retail Center Total Entry 40(100%) 2(51/.) 2(5%) 38(95%) Exit 50001/6) 1(20%) 1(20%1 4(80%) Total 415000%) 3 (7%) 3(71/.) 42 (931%) 826 -specialty Retail Center INTERNAL TRIPS 'OTAL TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS 710 - General Office Building Total Entry 781100%) 1(1%) I(m) 77 (99%) Exit 84 (100%) 2(2%) 2(2-/.) 82 (98%) ----- Total 162(1001/0) 3 (2%) 3(2%) — 159 (98%) EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass -by Trips for each Land Use. The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. The 10 icon preceding the Pass -by% value indicates data provided by ITE. Clicking the icon changes a custom Pass - by% value to data provided by ITE LAND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS BV'i6 PASS -By TRIPS NON -PASS -BY TRIPS 710 - General Office Budding 42 0 % 0 42 826 - Specialty Retail Center 158 25 % 40 119 I • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA = 26 15501 Old 41 – CPUD TIS –August 2017 PERIOD SETTING , DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period. and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips i generated in the analysis To record any notes, click Add Notes above PROJECT NAME. 15501 Oil) 41 - CPUO 826 - Specialty Retail Center ANALY47SNAME PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL :� 710 -General Office Building 1000 Sq. Feet Grose 16.25 Weekday, P.M. Pea vJ Best Fit (LIN) v _ � � 16 81 97 `-- - ------------ T=1.12(X)+78.45' .{ 826 - Specialty Retail Center 1000 S¢ Feat i� 2375 Weekday. P.M. Pea vJ A—go 1J 67- S2" 119' indicates small sample size use carefully 5.02 TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS INTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of trips that occur between the Land Use on the left and the Land Use on the right The table below displays the total number of trips that have been reduced from a particular Land Use The total number of Internal Trips for each Land Use will be deducted from the adjusted Entry Trips and Exit Trips from the previous section To record sry ^ores click the • Icon above For recommended values see the ITE Handbook or NCHRP 684. 710 - General Office Building 826 - Specialty Retail Center Exit 81 Demand Exit 20 % (16) Balanced: 5 Demand Entry 8 °% i5, Entry 67 Entry 16 Demand Entry 31 % (51 Balanced 1 Demand Exit 2 % t 1, Exit 52 EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass -by Trips for each Land Use The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section To record any notes click • Add Notes above The 10 icon preceding the Pass -by% value Indicates data provided by ITE Clicking the Icon changes a custom Pass -by% value to data provided by ITE LAND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS -BY% PASS -BY TRIPS NON -PASS -BY TRIPS '�. 710- General Office Budding 91 0 J% 0 91 826 - Specialty Retail Center 113 25 % 28 85 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 127 TOTAL TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS 826 - Specialty Retail Center Total Entry 16(100%) 1(6%) 1 (6%) 15(94%) Exit �._. 81(100%) 5(6%) 5(6%) 76(94%) Total 97(100%) 6 (6%1 616%) _ 91 (94%) 826 - specialty Retail Center *RIGS . TOTAL TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS 710 - General Office Building Total Entry 67 1100%I 5 I7%i 5 (7%) 62(93%) Exit 52 (100%1 1 '-%, 1(2%) 51(98%) Total 119 000% v 5% _ 6(5%) 113 (95%) p EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass -by Trips for each Land Use The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section To record any notes click • Add Notes above The 10 icon preceding the Pass -by% value Indicates data provided by ITE Clicking the Icon changes a custom Pass -by% value to data provided by ITE LAND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS -BY% PASS -BY TRIPS NON -PASS -BY TRIPS '�. 710- General Office Budding 91 0 J% 0 91 826 - Specialty Retail Center 113 25 % 28 85 1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 127 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS —August 2017 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibit (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA - 1 28 (a l0"IN 15501 Old 41 — CPUD TIS— August 2017 FUTURE LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING PLO(ARSOR LANES) EXISTING LAND USE MULTI FAMILY \1 16 TYPE "B" BUFFER 8 CPUDBOINDkRY N PROPERTY SOUNOARYI \ 1 NO BUFFER REGUIRED \1 PARCEL 'A' y�j >• COMMERCIAL PARKING AREA BUILDING CPUO BOUNDARY g OV 32.500 SF PROPERTY uull V ¢ �w t BD HOARY) TYPED" io15 F Plot INTERNAL ROW BUFFER TRACT W �C LINE SO°�D UTURE LAND USE ------ -------------- —� -- STRIALDISTRICT �- -IOP_ GOY161CIN O ZONRNG I PARCEL'S" EKISTINGLAND USE- WAREHOUSE LIGHT 7300 SF PARKING ` INDUSTRIAL AREA E50/21 11 TYPE I NO BUFFER REOUIRED ROW BUFFER 10 TYPE .A. LEGEND BUFFER F----1 - FUTURE LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT -F w' ZONING PUD (STERLING OAXSI &- n PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE FUTURE LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING PUD( ARBORLAKESI EXISTING LAND USE MULT - FAMILY 15 TYPE 'B" BUFFER CPUD BOMWRY PROPERTYRDUNDARY. NO BUFFER REQUIRED \ T 1 \\1 PARCEL ..A.. COMMERCIAL PARKING i BUILDING AREA CPUD BOUNOMY J y 32.500 SF D it (PROPERTY V BDUNDARYI 2 LLWV �I 15 TYPED" O INTERNAL ROW BUFFER g.... Wo3 — — — — — �TRk;T AM -57; PM 381 PARCEL 9' CY EXISTING LAND USE 100 I OOMMBlCIAL WAREHOUSE LIGHT BU60YK3 PARK NG INDUSTRIAL 5300 BF AREA - L AM -58: PM -39 NO BUFFER REOUIRED FUTURE LAND USE URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING PUD (STERLING OAKSI EXISTING LAND USE VACANT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY AM/PM PEAK HOUR Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1D TYPE A - BUFFER 129 ENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 PUD CONCEPT PLAN (8.5"x 1 1" 8 24"x 36") m n FUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT D ZONING: PUD (ARBOR LAKES) m , EXISTING LAND USE: MULTI - FAMILY 151 TYPE "B" BUFFER AI°o CPUD BOUNDARY 'V U (PROPERTY BOUNDARY) ~ NO BUFFER REQUIRED D c m - I Q / / U.1 PARCEL "A" U) �w / Q w COMMERCIAL PARKING z O to BUILDING AREA / m O w P 32.500 SF / PROPERTY PUD BOUNDARY � ? o PROPOSED / BOUNDARY) w w O INTERCONNECTION ~° X 151TYPE "D" °° z w INTERNAL ROW BUFFER PROPOSED g a g LL TRACT / / ACCESS w b z m LINE Of0 FUTURE D USE. ° O Z / NDUSTR ALIDISTRICT I N — — — — — — — — — — — — — P p ZONING:I PARCEL "B" O" EXISTING LAND USE: ECOMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE, LIGHT 1. p BUILDING y INDUSTRIAL g 7,500 SF PARKING AREA — 15FTYPE "D" NO BUFFER REQUIRED ROW BUFFER 10 [TYPE "A" BUFFER FUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT ZONING: PUD (STERLING OAKS) EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT INDUSTRIAL LEGEND WATER MANAGEMENT (DRY DETENTION) PROPOSED BUILDING lid PRESERVE FPLEASEMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS G7i ? i W Z A lwj I 0 g 8 Q W U Q � Q�/ FJ -I o a. Cn O i Q � z CD u u7 B \Projects\669-01 15501 Old US 41 \Drawings- Exhibits\669-01 -01 CPUD Master Plan\Current Plans\669010102.dwg GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. THE LOCATION, SIZE AND CONFIGURATION OF BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, LAKES, AND PARKING AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT THE TIME OF SDP. 2. COMMERCIAL INTENSITY MAY NOT EXCEED 40,000 SF. 3. PARKING TO BE PROVIDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LDC AT TIME OF I SDP APPROVAL. 4. 0.117± ACRES OF REQUIRED PRESERVE TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE WITHIN OPEN PRESERVE AREAS. THE MINIMUM PRESERVE REQUIREMENT OF 0.117 ACRES IS BEING MET AND 1.17 ACRES IS BEING PROVIDED ON-SITE WITHIN PRESERVE AREAS. 5. INTERNAL COMMERCIAL REQUIRED BUFFER PLANTINGS MAY BE RELOCATED TO OTHER PERIMETER BUFFERS ON THE SITE AS PER LDC SECTION 4.06.02.C.7. REQUIRED PRESERVE TOTAL REQUIRED 0.117 AC (1.17± AC NATIVE VEGETATION X 10%) TOTAL PROVIDED 1.17 AC (1.17± AC NATIVE VEGETATION X 10%) LAND USE SUMMARY PARCEL"A" PARCEL"B" TOTAL PRESERVE 0.79 AC 0.38 AC 1.17 AC FPL EASEMENT 0.55 AC 0.18 AC 0.73 AC WATER MANAGEMENT 0.24 AC 0.05 AC 0.29 AC COMMERCIAL 2.12 AC 0.54 AC 2.66 AC TOTAL 3.70 AC 1.15 AC 4.85 AC OPEN SPACE SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED (4.85 x 30%) 1.45 AC TOTAL PROVIDED 2.55 AC WATER MANAGEMENT 0.29 AC BUFFERS AND OTHER OPEN SPACE/PRESERVE 2.26 AC _ ' r�n.v rtcvia��iv� 3 j 10 08/04/17 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS 15501 OLD US 41 ROAD CPUD s 0 ENGINEERING 10/27/17 REVISED PER COUNTY COMMENTS CLIENT: FRANK NORBERTO & DGC & B, LLC a d CPDD MASTER PLAN NOTES !.... —K�..a a's`.dmr • FI1Tl AND USE: L.BAN RESIDENTIAL SUBOSTRICT ZONING'. FUD NRBDR LAKES) EXISTING AND USE: MaTI FAMILY CPDD BOUJOARY `(PROPERTY B DARY) 15, WIPE PM) BUFFER REQUIRED BUFFER PARCEL PARKING / -PROPOSED INTERCONNEI fINTERN, T RE uNE I 1 ■.■�■■■.■■.■*■■.■■.■■■.■.■......................... ■...... ■ .....■1 1 PARCEL "B" I 1aa COMMERCIAL I BUILDING PARKING AREA I 7,500 SF I ' I I � f— NO BUFFER REOURED tO:TYPE "A' FUTURE AND USE. L4ffiAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT zoNING PUo IsrERLIN6 mxs) EXISTING AND USE VACANT INDUSTRIAL 15:TVPE'D' IOW BUFFER LEGEND 1^ (DRY A MANAGEMENT N PROPOSED &II-ING PRESERVE FREASEMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS E 7 CPDD BOIIFK]ARY i (PROPERtt BOUNDARY) 151T'PE'o' ROW BUFFER / FUTURE ANO ME. INDIMTRIALDISTRICT LOWNG: I PROPOSED ACCESS / EXISTINGUNDUBE. UGMT / NDMTRILISE, INDJSTRIAL 15:TVPE'D' IOW BUFFER LEGEND 1^ (DRY A MANAGEMENT N PROPOSED &II-ING PRESERVE FREASEMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS E 7 i 15:TVPE'D' IOW BUFFER LEGEND 1^ (DRY A MANAGEMENT N PROPOSED &II-ING PRESERVE FREASEMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS E 7 GENERAL NOTES I THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE THE LOCATION, SIZE AND CONFIGURATION OF BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, LAKES. AND PARKING AREAS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT THE TIME OF SDP 2 COMMERCIAL INTENSITY MAY NOT EXCEED 40,000 SF. ] PARKING TO BE PROVIDED IN COMPLIANCE MATH LDC AT TIME OF SOP APPROVAL. 4 011 h ACRES OF REQUIRED PRESERVE TO BE PROVIDED ONSITE WITHIN PRESERVE AREAS THE MINIMUM PRESERVE REQUIREMENT OF 0.117 ACRES IS BEING MET AND 1 17 ACRES IS BEING PROVIDED ON-SITE WTHIN PRESERVE AREAS 5 INTERNAL COMMERCIAL REQUIRED BUFFER PLANTINGS MAY BE RELOCATED TO OTHER PERIMETER BUFFERS ON THE SITE AS PER LOC SECTION 4 00.02 C.7 REQUIRED PRESERVE TOTAL REQUIRED 0.117 AC 41.1 TAC NATIVE VEGETATION X 10%) TOTAL PROVIDED I 1.17 AC 1.171 AC NATIVE VEGETATION X 10%11 11 LAND USE SUMMARY PARCEL'A' PARCEL'B' I TOTAL PRESERVE 0.79AC 0.36 AC 117 AC FPLEASEMENT 0.56 AC 0.16 AC 0.73AC WATER MANAGEMENT 0.24 AC 0.05AC M29AC COMMERCIAL 212AC 0.54AC 2,WAC TOTAL 3.70AC 115AC 465AC OPEN SPACE SUMMARY TOTAL REQUIRED (4.85. 30%) 1.46 AC TOTAL PROVIDED 255 AC NATER MANAGEMENT 0.29 AC BUFFERS AND OTHER OPEN SPACEIPRESERVE 2.28 AC 0 0 0 1AIENGINEERING 15501 Old US 41 CPUD CCPC PACKAGE PL20170001083 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE - SIGN POSTING SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the First public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATF,R THAN TF.N (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ALEXIS CRESPO WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL2017000MAQ3 1--� IL 1V - 28100 BONITA GRANDE DR. #305 SIGNATURE OF APf LICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX ALEXIS CRESPO NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) # STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this q:_day ofbF., 20ft by �P_)C Gf EOIp , ersonally known to r who produced as identification and who did4 id not take an oath. P,,.r,.fNotary Public ��51 Ca- ,v-- • Linn Printed Name of Notary Public • My Commission Expires: • (Stamp with serial number) N, JESSICA K. UNN MY COMMISSION # FF 113421 d€ EXPIRES. Ap i 16.2018 Rev. 3/4/2015 "•?„ Bonded Thw PkMrd Irnrrame AgwW 'ry: 0 • • PL20170001083 17.A.7 Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID #4519 (4519 : 15501 OLD US 41 (PUDZ))