BCC Minutes 11/08/1988 R
..--.-..
-
Naples, Florida, November 8, 1988
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
ant for the County ot Collier, and also act:ng as the Board ot Zoning
Ap¡.eals and as the gov"rning board{s) ot suI;h special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSIOØ in BUilding
"P" of the Government ~omplex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following aembers present:
CHAIRMAN:
Burt L. Saunders
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
Anne Goodnight
John A. Pistor
Arnold Lee Glass
Max A. Hasse
ALSO PRESENT:
Ja.es C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
Director; Mallre,,"-n Kenyon. Ellie Hottman, and Dalila Mendez, Deputy
Clerks; Neil Darrill, County Manager; Ron McLemore, Assistant County
Manager; To. Olliff, Acting Community Development Administrator; Ken
Cuyler, County Attorney; Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; George
Archibald, Public Works Administrator; Kevin O'Donnell, Public
Services Administrator; Barbara CacChione, Dwight Nadeau and Philip
Sc~eft, Planners; Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant to
the Board; and Deputy Chief Ray Barnett, Sheritt's Department.
'\
Page 1
.. -.....-...----
Tape -I
Ite. .3
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
MDD.\ AJrD CO.SD'r AGEJrDA - APPROVED WITH CJL\JI'GES
Coaai..ioner Pi.tor aoved, seconded by Co..i..ioner Baa.e and
carri~ UD&ni80U8ly, that the agenda and con.ent agenda be approved
with the following changes:
It.. ..
1.
Item "5F added re procla..ation recognizll,g November 11, 1988
as "Veterans' Day" at Commissioner Saunders request.
2.
Itea 9Bl deleted re cancellation of Bid "88-1266 as this ite..
wa~ heard on November 1, 1988.
3.
Itea 14R3 moved to Item 9B2 at the request of Commissioner
Pi.tor re moditlcation ot excavation permit No. 59.204 "Sea
Con Quarry"
4.
Itea 6Bl re Pet. PDA-88-6C, continu~d to January 10, 1988 as
indicated on the agenda.
MIBOTZs or KZGOLAft MEETIØGS or OCTOBER 18, OCTOBER 2ð, AXD ØOVEMBEK 1,
ilea - APr,WV&D U PRESEJfTED
Coaal..ioner Pistor aoved, seconded by Co"lssioner B.... and
carri~ un&ni80U8ly, that the .inute. ot October 18, October 2ð, and
Ite. 'ðA
.oveaber 1, liee, be approved a. pre.ented.
JXPt.on:E SEJNICI AMARD ~EXTED TO WILLIAM STALnR , UTILITIES DEPT.
Coaaissioner Saunders presented a plaque and pin to William
Stalker ot the Utilities Department tor five years of service with
ColUer County.
It.. øðB
PROcLAMATIOX DISIGØATIXG ØOVEKBER, lie8, A' -EPILEPSY MOWTB- - ADOPTED
Upon reading and presenting the proclaaation to Ms. Ei. Wil.on,
Caaaiaaloner Pistor moved, seconded by Co..l.sioner GOOdnight and
carri~ un&niaously, that the proclaaation designating .ove.bar, li88,
.. wEpllepey Month" be adopted.
Page 2
It.. '&e
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
PROCLAIU'%'I~ DESIGØATI.G WOVEMBER 17, 1988, AS "GRUT AMERICAK
SMOnovr IW COLLIER COJ7JfrY" - ADOPTED
Upon reading and presenting the procla~ation to Ms. Kim Wilson,
Coaai..1oner Goodnight aoved, s.conded by Co..issloner Pi.tor and
carried un&niaously, that the proclaaat1on de.ignating Wove.her 17,
1988, aa -Gr.at Aaerican Saokeout in Collier County" be adopted.
Page 3
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. ,aD
PROCI..\KATIO. DESIGJI'ATIØO ØOVEM1lER, a8S, AS "DIABETES AM.&llEJIESS MaRTH"
- ADOPTED
Upon reading and presenting the proclaaation to Diana Longstreet
of the Collier County Chapter of the American Diabetes Association,
Coaai..ioner Ra... aoved, ..conded by Co..i.sioner alae. and carried
unaniaoualy, that the proclaaation designating Noveaber, 1988, aa
-Dlabete. Awaren... Month" be adopted.
Page 4
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. #sa
PROCI..I.M.&.'%'IO. DESIG](ATIØG THE WEa OF ØOV!MBER 14 - 18, 1988, AS "PRO
80.0 PUBLICO WEE~" - ADOPTED
Ope;. .. ~~~ing ~nd presenting the procl~~ation to Mr. David Dawson,
Coaal..1oner Saunders aoved, seconded by Co..lssioner Pi.tor and
carrl~ unaniaou8ly, that the proclaaation de81gnatlng the week of
.oveaber l' - 18, 1988, a. "Pro Bono Publico Week" be adopted.
Mr. David Dawson thanked the BCC for the proclamation noting that
th1. will inform the community ot the tree legal services that are
available this w~ek to those that cannot attord such services.
He
indicated that there will be seainars held during the week on child
support, taaily law, landlord/tenant law, wills, and small claim
issues.
Page 5
11
It.. ,ar
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
D&sI~ATI.O .OVEKBER 11, li88, AS "VETERAxS' DAYR -
Coa.issioner Glass read and presented the proclamation to Major
Don Price who thanked the Commission on behalf of a]] veterans for
their support of veter~ns activities.
Coaaiseloner Gl... aoved, seconded by Co..is.ioner Pistor and
carrl~ unani80USly, that the proclaaation designating .oveaber 11,
1188, ae "Veterans' Day" be adopted.
Page 6
_0..
It.. '6B2 If .6"
NOVEMBER 8,
1988
ORDIXAXCZ 8'-'. RE PETITIOØ R-88-20C, WILSOØ, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL Ir
PIU, I.C., REPR. NAPLES R If D GROUP, IØC. ltE A ltEZORE FROM A-2 TO POD
~~ AS IAPLES R If D ~ARX AT L!LY AXD PETITIOØ PDA-88-11C REQUESTING
AJr .\H1aUl'l&Jr1' TO THE LELY R Ir D PARX POD BY AMEJfDIRG THE POD MASTER
PLAJf - ADO PTED
L~ga1 notice having been published in the Na~les Daily N~ws on
October 7. 1988, as evidence~ by Atfidavit of Publication tiled with
the Clerk, public hearing was open~d to consider Petition R-88-20C,
filed by Wilson, Miller. Barton, 5011 & Peek, Inc. representing Naples
R & D Group, Inc., requesting a rezone trom A-2 to POD known as Naples
R & D Park at Lely in Sections 29 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 26
East and Petition PDA-88-11C requesting an amend..ent to the Lely R & D
Park POD by amending the PUD Mascer Plan.
Planner Cacchione stated that the objective of these petitions is
to rezone 8 acres from A-2 to POD known as N~p]pn R & D Park at Lely
and to amend the POD document to include this area within the POD as
Tract E.
She noted that land to the north and east across U.S. .1 is
zoned C-4 and residential single-tamily; land to the southeast is
zoned A-2 and POD; land to the south is zoned A-2 and A-2"ST"; and
lanJ to the north and west is zoned A-2.
She indicat~d that thls
request will increase the size ot the POD trom 56.8 acres to 64.8
acres, adding that the proposed use is to allow for a back lot tor a
variety ot exterior scenes necessary in contemporary tilm production.
She stated that the PUD am~ndment also includes adding permitted Uses
to Tracts A, C, & 0 incl~ding motion picture and TV production, film
production, private clubs, commercial recreation, accessory lodging
facilities and restaurants as well as adding hotel/motel and
re.taurants to Tract B.
She noted that the legal description would
have to be changed and the Master Plan amended as w~ll as other minor
moditications.
She indicated that the overall intensity of th~ PUD
has been decreased in maximum bUilding Coverage from 1,097,712 square
teet to 478,500 squar~ t~et and the traffic generation of the project
has been decreased by 33' according to the tratfic impact 8tatement.
~ reported that the additional uses requ~sted in the POD have b~en
Page 7
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
determined to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and are
compatible within the POD.
She stated that ðll appropriate County
agencies have reviewed these petitions and have no objection to their
approval based on the surrounding zoning and land use patterns as well
as the re:-"'ended mitigation measures included in the POD document.
She stated that the CCPC recommended approval of these petitions sub-
ject to staft's stipulations with the changes as noted in the
agreement sheet which has been incorporated into the POD document.
She noted that one person Spoke at the CCPC meeting in favor of the
petition and one letter was received requesting additional infor-
aation.
She concluded by stating that she is recommending approval ot
Petition R-88-20C and PDA-88-]]C.
Mr. Alan Reynolds of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SoIl & Peek, Inc.
staled that statt ha~ r~~nmmended approval ot these requests as well
as the CCPC and there are no outstanding issues or questions with
respect to the petitions.
He noted that Staff was directed to tast-
track these petitions, adding that the Stat! has been most helptul and
has done an excellent job on these petitions.
The tollowing people spoke in tavor ot these petitions citing the
compatibility of this project with the surrounding area and the desire
that construction begin immediately:
Bob Bothwell
George Keller
Joe Long
Coamissioner Glass indicated that he haÐ had some discussions with
repreSentatives ot this project and ..ay have some tuture negotiations
with the International Studios; therefore, he has decided to abstain
from voting on the matter and has tiled a Contlict ot Voting for. with
the Clerk.
Coaai..ioner Piator moved, .econded by Co..i..ioner Baa.e and
carrl~ 4/0,
(Co..i..ioner Gl... abstaining), that the public hearing
~ cl~.
Coaai..loner Pl.tor aoved, seconded by Co..i.8ioner GOodnigh~ and
carri~ 4/0, (Co..is.toner Gla.. ab.taining), that the Ordinance aa
~
1
Pag.8
~
--.-...."....
ØOVEMBER 8, 1988
nuabeTeð and titled below re Petitions R-88-20C and PDA-88-11C be
adopt~ and entered into Ordinance Book .0. 32:
ORDINANCE 88-84
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-26-9 BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESt;RIBEU REAL PROPERTY FROM
A-2 to "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT K;.40WN AS NAPLES P. 6t D PARK
hr LELY FOR APPROXIMATELY 8 ACRES WHICH WILL PROVIDE FOR A VARIETY
OF EXT2PIOR S~ENES NE~ESSARY IN CONTEMP~RARY FILM PRODUCTION FOR
PPOP~RTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U5-41, APPROXIMATELY
ONE-MILE SOUTHEAST OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMO:K ROAD IN SECTIONS 29 AND
30 TOWNSHIP 50 SOUT~, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
AMENDING PUD ORDINANCE 86-18 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE LELY RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT PARK, BY CHANGING THE PROJE~T NAME; AMENDING INDEX
PAGE OF THE POD DOCUMf'.NT; AMF.NDTNG LIST OP fl.XIITßTTS AND TABLES;
AMENDING STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE; AMENrING SHORT TITLE; AMENDING
SECTION 1, PROPERTY DF.S~RIPTION AND OWNERSHIP; SUBSECTION 1.01
INTRODUCTION, LOCATION, AND PURPOSE; SrBSECTION 1.02 LEGAL
DESCRIPTIOU; SF.~TION II PROJECT DEVELOfMENT: SUBSECTION 2.02
GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, SUBSECTION 2.05 LAND USES; SUBSECTION
2.06 DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE AND SCHEDULE; AMENDING TABLE I, LAND USE
SUMMARY; AMENDING SECTION III - PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS - TRACTS A, C AND D; SUBSECTION 3.01 PURPOSE; SUBSECTION
3.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES AND PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES
AND STRUCTURES; SUBSECTION 3.03 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: AMENDING
SECTION IV - PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - TRACT B,
SUBSECTION 4.01 PURPOSE; SUBSECTION 4.02 PERMITTED USES AND
STRUCTURES - PERMITTED PRIUCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES; ADDING
SECTION V - PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOP~ENT STANDARDS - TRACT E;
AMENDING FORMER SECTION FIVE-GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS TO
BECOME SECTION SIX; AMENDING THE PUD MASTER PLAN AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 9
. --~. ----""
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. "83
ORDI.~CE 88-85 RI PETITIOX R-88-10C, HOLE, MOØTES a ASSOCIATES, IØC.
REPR. DR. ~OHØ A. MCCOy, TRUSTEE, HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, INC.
REQUESTIXG A REZOXE FROM A-2 AJrD RSF-3 TO POD FOR SURREY PLACE
COJIVALE.SCDT CE1fTl:R OX THE SOUTH SIDE OF IHMOICALEE ROAD - ADOPTED
SUBJECT TO ~ Or:' THE PUD DOCUMENT AJm PETITIOXER S AGREEMENT
Leg~l notice h~ving been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 7, 1988, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-88-10C,
tiled by Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. representing Dr. John A.
McCoy, Trustee, Health Care Associates, Inc., requesting a rezone from
A-2 and RSF-3 to PUD to be known as "Surrl".Y Plact" Convalescent Center"
to be developed into a nursing home/congregate living tacility/
protessional oftices/{private) child day care facility for property
located on the south side of Immokalee Road (CR-846) approximately 1/4
ailes west of Airport-Pulling Road, in Section 26, Township 48 South,
Range 25 East, consIsting of 14.28 acres.
Planner Schetf stated that lands to the north, across Immokalee
Road, are zoned RSF-3 and RT which 1s Palm River Estates; l~ds to the
east are zoned PUD which is Southhampton at Naples POD which i8
planned tor 799 residenti~l units, recreational, conservation, and
wa.er aanage..ent related elements; land to the south are zoned RSF-3
which is Southwind Estates; and lands to the west are zoned A-2 and
RO.
He indicated that to the north across Immokalee Road is a
drainage easement and wooded buttering tronting Palm River Estates; to
the east are undeveloped woodlands; to the south arl". single family
homes and undeveloped woodlands; and to the west are undeveloped
woodlands.
He stated that this project is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
He indicated that the Petitioner is proposing to
develop a 14.28 acre site with a 120 bed nursing home, a 60 unit (80
bed) congregated living tacility, a private child day care tacility,
and a protessional ottice building.
He noted that the professional
ottice building is proposed to be developed on a 2.27 acre tract south
of Iaaokalee Road and east of Parnu Street, adding that all other
proposed uses are planned for a 12.01 acre tract south ot Iamokalee
Page 10
z.3
--.-..-..----.....
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Road and west ot Parnu Street.
He reported that Start recommends
approval of this petition subject to amendment of the PUD document and
the POD Master Plan which is to include all Staff's stipulations in
the statf r~port and as contained in the Agreement Sheet.
He noted
that the CCPC unanimously r~co..ended approval of this petition sub-
ject to all changes, adding that subsequent to the CCPC public
hearing, Statf mEt with the Petitioner and resolved issues that were
lett outstanding and all ~hang~s hav~ b~en incorporated into the POD
Docum~nt and on the POD Ma5t~r Pldn.
He indicat~d that also sub-
sequent to .' ~ CC?C hearing,
the Petitioner revised the request tor
the professional otfices building fro. 21,775 square teet to 22,600
square teet which will require an additional 3 parking spaces and will
ne~d to ~ reflected on tit.... finl!ll r....vislons of 'he POD docu..ent and
the POD Haster Plan.
He noted that no one spoke tor or against this
petition and no correspondence has been received, and therefore, Start
is recom.ending approval subject to all stipulations.
Mr. George Hermanson of Hole, Hontes «Associates indicated that
he has consultants with him that are available tor any questions the
Co..1ssion may have, adding that he is in agreement with all Staff
stipulations and recommendations.
He noted that his only comment ls
that the profes"ional offic....~ bllilding will not be increased in square
footage, noting that Jt will remain at the previously requested 21,775
square feet; and therefore, there will not be a need tor the addi-
tional three parking spaces.
He noted that the PtJD document and the
PUD Haster Plan will reflect all stipulations.
Coaai.sioner P1stor moved, seconded by Co..iss1oner Goodnight and
carr1~ unaniaously, that the pub11c hear1ng be closed.
Co..1ssioner Pis tor moved, seconded by Co..issloner Goodnight and
carr1~ unan1aously, that the ordinance.. numbered and titled below
be e40pt~ subject to ...ndaent of the POD docuaent, the POD Ma8ter
Plan and the Pet1tioner's Agree..nt and entered into Ordinance Book
.0. 32:
ORDINANCE 88-85
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
Page 11
----
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 48-25-7 BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM A-2 AND RSF-3 TO "PUD" TO BE KNOWN AS "SURREY PLACE
CONVALESCENT CENTER" TO BE DEVELOPED INTO A NURSING
HOME/CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY/PROFESSIONAL OFFICES/{PRIVATE
CHILD DAY CARE FACILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 12
-"""'-"-""'"
.._._"..._.~_.......
2j
.-'--"'."-""--"--
'---"-"""'0 ...
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. nM
ORDI..~ 88-86 RE PETITIO. R-87-.0C, Q. GRADY HIØOR AKD ASSOCIATES,
RUK. .oounELD I..AaS PAR'l'JrERSBIP, L.T.D., REQt1ESTIØG A REZOn FROM
POD '%'0 POD EIONX AS "MOODrIELD LAXES" POD rOR 4ðl HOLTI-rAMILY
DWELLIR UJrITS AJrD COHHUKITY CQMŒRCIAL USES OJr THE EAST SIDE or C.R.
9ðl .ORTB or U.S. 41 - ADOPTEp SUBJECT TO PETITJOJrER'S AGREEMIJrT
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 7, 1988, as evid~nced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-87-40C,
tiled by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, representing Woodfield Lakes
Partnership, L.T.D., requesting a rezone trom POD to PUD tor the deve-
lopment known as "Woodfield Lakes" for 451 multi-family dwelling units
and coamunity commercial uses, for property located on the east side
ot C.R. 951, 400 feet ~ North of U.S. 41 East, cons1sting ot 69.32
acres.
Planner Scheff stated that the BCC heard this petition on
September 13, 1988, and recommended denial, but on September 27, 1988,
the BCC voted to re-hear this petition.
He noted that the pet1tioner
has revised the proposal by changing the lake depth trom -17.0 ft.
ngvd to -6.5 tt. ngvd per the approved excavation permit and has
reduced the intensity of the request tor Co~mercial land uses fro. C-3
to r-1 uses plus automobile service stations - fuel dispensIng only
subject to Section 9.8 and the PUD agreement regarding the Marco
Island Water supply, food markets, tast tood restaurants, restaurants,
and any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the
foregoing listed uses and which the Planning/Zoning Director deter-
8ines to be compatible.
He stated that even with the proposed
changes, Staff recommends that the community commercial acreage not be
approved.
He noted that Staff does tind that the multi-tamily land
residential use would be appropriate and with appropriate buffering,
Statt recomaends that an additional 70 units be permitted to allow a
total of ð21 multi-tamily residential units for this PUD.
He noted
that the CCPC reviewed the original request and recommended approval
subject to changes, however, the CCPC has not reviewed the reviLed
petition.
He indicated that Statt recommends that the 451 multi-
Page 13
---____n___.
33
....---- .
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
faaily residential units be approved because they comply with the
Comprehensive Plan and will provide a needed housing type as well as
being compatible with surrounding properties.
He noted that Staff
also recom.ends that an additional 70 multi-family units for the
acreage presently proposed tor commercial be allowed which would con-
sist at a total ot 521 units and that the proposed community commer-
cial acreage be denied becau~e it is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan since the need ~or the commercial tract has not
been demonstrated.
Mr. Q. Grady Minor, representing the Petitioner, stated that this
revised plan would include 451 units and would be less intense.
He
noted that the comaercial activity is at the intersection of U.S. 41
and C.R. 951 which is a comm~rcial node.
He noted that this plan is
consistent with the present and future Comprehensive Plan.
He noted
that this property falls within the tuture activity center area that
will be adopted in January, 1989.
He noted that the total community
coaaercial area is for 49,000 squar... teet and they are trying to Use
this CO_ercial to butter the residence along C.R. 951. He noted that
there would only be one access into the development which will then
hav~ an internal road system.
He noted that the request tor commer-
cial is only for tlve acres which will be uses that can be used now
and in the tuture.
He stated that he is requesting approval of this
petition.
Coaaissioner Pistor questioned if there is any chance of there
being a tast toad restaurant and a regular restaurant, to which Mr.
Minor stated th~t there would only be one reRtaurRnt on tive acreo.
Coaaissioner Hasse questioned if a convenience store would be on-
site to which Mr. Minor indicated that one is allowed there, but there
is an existing Circle K at the intersection.
Coaaissioner Hasse indicated that a conveni...nce store generates a
lot of traffic which would be on C.R. 951, a two-lane road.
Co..issioner Pistor indicated that C.R. 951 is scheduled to be
tour-Ianed and it is already being surveyed.
Page 14
7?/
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that the four-Ianing
ot C.R. 951 from U.S. 41 to Rattlesnake Hammock Road is scheduled for
construction in 1991.
He noted that the access points ot the Lely POD
and the Woodtiel~ Lakes would be aligned opposite from each other and
it a tratfic signal is warranted ðt build-out, one will be installed.
Mr. Minor indicated that the build-out ot Woodfield Lakes will be
~ither 1994 or 1995.
Mr. George Keller stated that he feels that approving commercial
for this area would be setting a precedent for tuture POD's.
He indi-
cated that this would be creating a traftic hazard and living behind a
co..ercial area is not aesthetically pleasing.
He noted that with a
gas station in the area, it could have an effect on the Marco Island
water supply also.
Mr. Gary Beyrent, Petitioner, stated that the intersection of
U.S. 41 and C.R. 951 was designated as a commercial node in 1983,
adding that he is restricted to a maximum of ~ acres, but only wants 5
acres zoned commercial.
He stated that the Planning Department would
like him to have an additional 70 dwelling units, but he does not need
them and would like to le~ve it at 451 units.
He noted that he has
reduced the intensity of the commercial from C-3 to C-l which contorms
with the existing and the future Comprehensive Plan.
He noted that
there is only one access into the project.
Coamissioner Pistor questioned it Mr. Beyrent would be willing to
stipulate that the gas station be located at the south end of the
CO..ercial area, to which Mr. Beyrent replied atfirmatively.
He
stated that he has already agreed that he will not build a gas station
until the Marco Water Supply source has been closed down in that area.
Comaissioner Pistor stated that he would like the petitioner to
look at developing an east access in case of an emergency, to which
Mr. Beyrent indicated that he has no problem with such a request.
He
noted that there would not be any direct access to the gas station
fro. C.R. 951, adding that there is an access road ott C.R. 951 that
'8 into the interior roadway system.
Page lð
-_.
"~"""-"""'"
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Co8aiasioner P1stor aov~, .econded by Co..isaioner Goodnight and
carried unani80U8ly, that the public hearing be cl08ed.
~s.loner Pi.tor moved, seconded by Co..is810ner Goodnight and
carrl~ unani80U81y, that the Ordinance.. numbered and t1tled below
be adopt~ and entered into Ordinance Book Bo. 32, subject to. gas
8tatioa be~ located at the south end ot the coaaercial area and sub-
ject to Petitioner'. Aqr-..nt:
ORDINANCE 88-86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BV AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 51-26-2 BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM POD TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
WOODFIELD LAKES FOR 451 MULTI-FAMIT.Y DWELLING UNITS AND COMMERCIAL
USES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SR-951 APPROXIMATELY
400~ FEET NORTH OF US-41 EAST; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Coaaissioner Saunders stated that he previously voted against this
petition, but he now t~els that this is a better plan and the commer-
cial is consistent with the present and future Co..prehensive Plan
which why he is now voting in favor of the petition.
Page 16
11-)()
"'--".""".
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It- H8a
ORDI~CK 88-81 HE PETITIO. R-S8-11C, DR. XEXO 3. SPAG.A, REPRESEXTIXQ
AJrTBOJrT .,. 3AJrCIGAR, REQUltSTIØG A REzon FROM A-2 AJrD A-2.ST. TO PUD
FOR PI~ RIDGE CEØTER WEST OM THE SOOTH SIDE OF PIn RIDGE ROAD EAST
OF I-n - ADOPTED SOBJEç':L.T01rr~TIonR S Aq~~~JIT ---------
Legal notice having bepn published in the Naples Daily News on
October 7, 1988, as evidenced by Atfidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, publir hearing waR opened to consider Petition R-88-11C,
filed by Dr. Neno J. Spagna, representing Anthony F. Jancigar,
requesting a rezone from A-2 and A-2"ST" to POD to be known as Pine
Ridge Center West tor 8,87 acres ot interchange related commercial
u8es, for property located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road
approxiaately 3/4 aile west of 1-75, in Seçtion 18, Township 49 South,
Range 26 East,
Planner Nadeau stated that land to the north across Pine Ridge
Road is zoned POD which is Naples Gateway; land to the east is zoned
PUD which 15 -:.,Q Ridge Center; land to the south is zoned A-2 with an
act1ve provisional use tor earthmining; and land to the west is zoned
1\-2 'Inti A-2"ST",
H.. not",! that on P..,hr1lnry 10,
1QR7, the Bce iden-
titied the western limit of the Interchange Commercial node as
the western boundary of Naples Gateway POD aligning with Good Earth
j)rivf! to tilt'. south.
H~ Ind c~tf'.d tll~t the ~ubJect property's western
boundary abuts Good Earth Drive thereby placing thin requested POD
within the boundaries ot the Interchange Commercial Node.
He noted
that this request is; therefore, co;.sidered to be appropriate for thi~
area and does comply with the Comprehensive Plan.
He noted that the
petitioner has ruvised thf' master plan indicating tract boundaries and
the identitication of such tracts.
He noted that the entrance will be
relocated ott Pine Ridge Road at the eastern moat boundary or the pro-
ject.
He stated that the CCPC reviewed this request on October 6,
1988, and unanimously recommended approval subject to stipulat10ns,
adding that there was no public comment tor or against this petition
and no correspondence haR been received.
Dr. Neno Spagna, representing the petitioner, stated that he has
Page 17
tA
_-M"~-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
worked with Staft in trying to meet all the requirements of the
Comprehensive Plan and the petitioner is willing to co..ply with all
the stipulations.
He indicated that he is asking that the BCC approve
this request.
In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Dr. Spagna stated that there
will be a aotel at Pine Ridge Center West and they would like to start
as soon a~ possible in getting it underway.
~aa1oner Goodnight aoved, seconded by Co..isaJoner Pi.tor and
carri~ unaniaoualy, that the public hearing be closed.
Coaaisaioner Goodnight aoved, seconded by Co..is.10ner Pi.tor and
carried. unani.80U81y, that the Ordinance.. nuabered and titl~ below
be edopted and enter~ into Ordinance Book 32 subject to the
Petitiooer'. Agr....nt:
ORDIIIAHCE 88-87
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 49-2b-3 BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM
A-2 TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS PINE RIDGE CENTER
WEST FOR INTERCHANGE RELATED COMMERCIAL USES; AND PROVIDIHG AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 18
------
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
.... aec...: 10:10 A.M. - Reconvened: 10:25 A.M. at which
t1ae Deputy Clerk Bottaan replac~ Deputy Clerk Eanyon ....
It.. .6C2
RESOLOTIO. 88-276, RE PETITIOR AV-88-024, REAL PROPERTY DEPARTMERT
RJtQO'EnI.G VACATIOR OF 20' REAR !:.\SEMEns oø LOTS 7-10, XAnES BAYVIDr
ADDITIO. .0. 1 - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 23 and 30, 1988, as evIdenced by Aftld~vJt of Publication
tiled with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition
AV~88-024, Real Property Department, requesting vacation ot the twenty
toot rear easeaents on Lots 7-10, Naples Bay Addition No.1 so owner
will grant an alternate utility easement.
Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that this request is
tor approval of the vacatIon of the twenty foot rear easeaents on Lots
7-10, Naples Bayview Addition No.1 located at the corner of Danford
and Fern Streets.
He noted thdt the vacation ot the subject easements
will result in an exchange between the rear lot easements, and the
County obtaining front yard easements tor the construction of a
sewerage litt station.
He advised that Letters of No Objection have
been received from all pertinent utilities, and staff is recommending
approval ot the Subject petition.
~.sioner Pistor aov~, seconded by Co..iaaioner Baa.. and
carried unaniaoualy, that the public hearing be closed.
~sa1oner P1.tor aoved, seconded by Co..issioner Goodnight and
carri~ ananiaoualy, to accept the recoaaendation ot St4tt that
ae.olution 88-276 re Petition AV-88-024 be adopted.
Page 19
Lff
""""._..",..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. #eel
ORDI8A8CK II-II AKK8DI.G ORDI.AICE 76-42, AND RESOLUTIOØ 88-277
I~&"'IJrG TRD R:I:MOVAL PERMIT RES - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naple~ Daily News on
October 20, 1988, as evidenced by Aftidavit of Publication tiled w1th
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an ordinance amending
Ordinance 76-42 regarding tree removal permits, and a resolution
increasing the fees.
Acting Comaunity Development Administrator Ollitf indicated that
Staft was previously authorized to prepare new rate increases relating
to development issues.
He indicated that the subject rate increases
are for tree removal permits.
He noted that the current fee structure
i. 55.00 for the first acre, and $5.00 tor each additional acre.
He
advised that each tree removal permit requires a site visit by Staff
to ensure that the trees which are protected under the County's
Environmental Ordinances are marked and designated, and that those
trees are preserved, wherever possible.
He noted that a follow-up
inspection is also required, to make sure that the tree clearing was
done according to the original tree survey.
He stated that Stat! is
requesting that the tees for the tirst acre be increased from $5.00 to
545.00; and $45.00 tor each additional acre, up to a maximum of $900.
He advised that the rates are included in a separate resolution, 80
that the resolution may be amende~ without amending the ordinance.
~ssloner Pi.tor aoved, secon~ by Co..issioner Goodnight and
carri~ unaniaoualy, that the public hearing be closed.
Coaais.10ner Pistor aoved, seconded by Co..issioner Goodnight and
carri~ unani80U81y, to accept Statt's re~o...ndation that the ordi-
nance - Duaber~ and ti tIed belOtf be adopted and ent.r~ into
Ordlnaoce Book. .0. 32, and that Resolution 88-277 be adopted.
ORDINANCE 88-88
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 75-21, AS
AMENDED BY COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 75-42, BY PROVIDING A NEW
DEFINITION FOR DIRECTOR; PROVIDING REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW FEES
FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 20
-------
j(
.-....-................,...--..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. -.c3
ORD~ 88-8i CRUTIØG A COClfTY-WIDE CODE DFORCEKEKT BOARD -
ADO PTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on
October 20, 1988, as evidenced by Aftidavit ot Publicatlon filed with
the Clerk, public hearjng was opened to consider an ordinance to be
known as the Collier County Code Enforcement Boards Ordinance.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that the proposed ordinance wl11
create a County-wide Code Enforcement Board.
He stated that a Code
Entorceaent Board is currently in existence, with the geographical
jurisdiction ot Marco Island, which will be repealed by the proposed
ordinance.
Assistant County Attorney Wilson stated that input has been
received fro. the various County departments which will be utilizing
this ordinance.
She advised that this ordinance will provide for a
non-criminal method of enforcing the Ordinances and Codes of Collier
County.
She noted that the subject Board will handle violations in a
more ex~ditious manner, and is a less expensive method ot handling
violations.
She stat~d that one Ooard will be created initially, but
the ordinance allows tor the creation of additional boards, it the
workload deems necessary.
She advised that the subject Board will be
created under Florida Statutes, Chapter 162, with reterence made to
several codes, and those are included in the ordinance as a matter of
description, and not limitation, i.e. Housing, Zoning, Building,
Signs, Occupational Licenses, Fire, etc.
Attorney Wilson advised that the method of enforcement that the
ordinance allows the Board to use is by tines, which are up to
82~O/per day, per violation.
She indicated that this ordinance also
allows for the imposition ot liens, atter asRessm~nt ot the fines.
She noted that the ordinance sets torth membershlp composition,
hearing procedures, powers of the Board, penalties, lien provlsions
and ap~al and notice procedures for the Board.
She noted that a
-rge packet of torms have been created tor the various departments
Page 21
--..
which wll1 be utilizing this ordinance.
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
She advised that it is anti-
cipated that the departments that are interested in a particular Code
or Ordinance will have ~ Staft member present the cases, and the
County Attorney will ~~ counsel to the Code Enforcement Board.
Hrs. Wilson stated that the type of membership Composition of this
Board should include, when possible; architects, engineers, busi-
nessmen, contractors/subcontractors, and realtors.
She noted these
members sh~uld b~ County residents, electors, and they should have
expertise in the areas that will be entorced by the Board.
She noted
that revenues will be generated by this Board.
Mrs. Wilson noted changes in the ordinance from the time it was
PUblicized, to the present time, specifically, that the changes were
in the -thod tor publJcizing for new members, advertising for vacan-
cies on the Board, and providing tor periodic review of the Board.
She stated that she is reco...ending adoption of this Ordinance, and
that advertising commence for interested members.
Coaaissioner Hasse complimented Assistant County Attorney Wilson,
Mr. Clark and other Staft members for their efforts and work they have
done in providing input tor this ordinance.
Coaaissioner Saunders stated that he believes that this is a step
in the right direction, and he teels that there will be the need tor
additional Code Enforcement Boards.
He advised that he has received
letters fro. Judge Trettis, and Donald Paul Day, Assistant State
Attorney, supporting the proposed ordinance.
Co..lssioner Pistor stated that the Code Enforcement Board on
Marco Island worked very well, adding that he believes that the
creation of additional Boards will expedite the problems of aanyof
the violations that occur.
Ms. Lee Layne stated that she feels this is a Positive move on the
part ot the County, adding that this Board will relieve the court
system fro. the many cases that are heard.
She indicated that she
Supports the proposed ,:-,~jnance.
Hr. William Jones, Chairman ot Collier County Contractors'
Page 22
~Lj
""""--"""'.""""
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Licensing Board stated that there are many problems relating to Zonlng
matters and other violations within the County, and he endorses the
proposed ordinance.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the County Attorney's office,
under the proposed ordinance, advises either Cou~ty Start or the Code
Enforceaent Board.
He indic~ted that in many areas that have a Code
Entorcement Board, there is an att~rney outside the County Attorney's
Office that advises this Board.
He noted that they ~re paid through
collected tees trom the tines, adding that he is unsure at this time
what the volume ot this Board will be, but an outside attorney may be
a necessity, some time in the tuture.
Coaaissioner Hasse suggested that the Board ot County
Co..issioners receive reports trom the Code Entorcement Board.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that the subject Board is not an
Advisory Board since it is being established by Statute.
It was the consensus of the Commission that the ordinance include
language which states, "Statf is to provide quarterly reports to the
Board ot County Commissioners, in writing, as to the activities of the
COGe Enforcement Board."
ec-i-loner Pl.tor 8OV~, ..conded by Coaai..ioner Baa.. aDd
carrled unanl80U81y, that the public hearing be closed.
ec-i..ioner Pi. tor aoved, .econded by Co..i..ioner Baaee and
carrl~ UDanl80U81y, that the ordinance as nuabered and titl~ below
be adopt~ and entered into Ordlnance Book Øo. 32, including addi-
tlonal languAge statlng that Statt i. to provide quarterly reports to
the Board ot County Co..issioner. in writing regardlng the activltie.
ot the Code Entorce..nt Board, and approval granted to solicit
intere.ted partie. tor appointment to the seven-aeaber Board:
ORDINANCE 88-89
AN ORDINANCE TO BE KNOWN AS THE COLLIER COUNTY ÇODE ENFORCEMENT
BOARDS ORDINANCE; SETTING FORTH THE FINDINGS AVO PURPOSE; SETTING
FORTH APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; ESTABLISHING THE LOCAL
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD COMPOSITION, MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND
TERMS OF MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR ORGANIZATION; PROVIDING AN
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR CONDUCT OF HEARING; SETTING
FORTH THE POWERS OF THE ENFORCEMENT BOARD; PROVIDING FOR SUBPOENA
PROCEDURES; ESTABLISHING PENALTIES; PROVIDING FOR REHEARING OF
BOARD ACTION; PROVIDING FOR APPEALS TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; DEFINING
Page 23
--""-~,,_.-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
NOTICES; PROVIDING THAT PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE ARE
SUPPLEMENTAL; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
It- ìJ6C6
ORDIJI.UJCE ESTABLISHUG UD IMPOSI.G MORATORIUM O. THE ISStJAJlCE or
PERKITS '%'0 MOVI BOILDI.GS IJrrDDED rOR OR CO.STRUCTED FOR HUMAJf
BABITATIO1I In'O GOLDD GATE ESTATES - øo ACTIOØ. EMERGDCY ORDI.UCE
88-80 IlEPU.LJtD
Legal notice having be~n publ.sh~d in th~ Naples Daily News on
October 20, 1988, as evidenced by Attidavit ot Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an ordinance
establishing and imposing a moratorium on the issuance of any permit
to aove any structure intended for human h~bitation into Golden Gate
Estates.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that an Emergency Ordinance was
enacted on October 18, 1988, to place a moratorium on the issuance or
permits to move structures of less than 1,500 square teet into Golden
Gate Estates.
He noted that the basis of the proposed ordinance is to
prohiblt the moving of buildings which are constructed or intended for
huaan habitation into Golden Gate Estates until the Golden Gate Master
Plan i. completed and presented to the Board.
He advised that the
ordinance as proposed do~s not contain language relating to the 1,500
square teet ot tloor area in size, but noted that the Board could
retain that criteria, which would be inserted in the ordinance.
Co..issioner Pistor stated that he feels the square footage require-
aent should be included in the ordinance, or there will be dwellings
ot 800 square teet being moved into the area.
Mr. George Keller, President ot Collier County Civic Federation
indicated that he does not teel that a squ~re toota~e requirement
should be included in this ordinance, noting that there are present
codes which must be met, and if the requirements for concrete, tie
beaas, metal straps on the root, etc. can be met before they are
aoved, he does not feel that people would object, but he noted, in the
past, aany ot the homes were not improved before they were moved.
County Manager Dorrill advised that no buildings will be allowed
Page 24
"'-"_.-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
to be moved until they comply with County Cod~s.
tape '2
Mr. Robert Cadenhedd stated that the County addresses the problem
ot houses that are to b~ move~ by County Cod~;
I.~. ~quðre tootage,
pluabing, electrical, structural.
ordinance which dictates how these houses can be moved down the road,
He noted that there is also an
noting that a moratorIum i9 not necessary.
He provided photos of
homes that have been moved, ðnd noted that if these homes co..ply with
Code they should be permitted to be moved.
He indicated that he urges
the Coaaission not to adopt the proposed ordinance.
He suggested that
the Board ot County Commissioners allow him to work with the County
Manager, to work out all the details that could be covered in one
ordinance.
eo..i.sioner Pi.tor aoved, seconded by Co..issioner Baa.e and
carri~ unaniaoualy, that the public bearing be closed.
Coaaissioner Saunders stðted that he has a problem with
understanding the urgency of the proposed ordinance, notlng that It a
structure is built In ðccordance with the existin~ codes in Golden
Gate, he does not understand why that structure should not be moved
there.
Co..issioner Goodnight indicated that she concurs with
Coaaissioner Saunders.
Com.issioner Hasse stated that he has seen some ot the homes that
have been moved into tt.e Estates, and they were not improved nor are
they conducive to the betterment ot the Golden Gate Estates area.
ec-i..ioner Haase aoved to support the aoratorlwa tor the Golden
Gate &8tat.. area.
Motion tailed, tor lack ot second.
Coaai..loner Pistor aoved, seconded by Coaaissioner Goodnight and
carrl~ 4/1 (Co..i.sioner Hasse opposed) to repeal Eaergency Ordinance
11-10.
Page 25
-.
.".. .._. ."...... "'","""""H"'.'..-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. "AI
RESOLOTIO. 88-270, PETITIOØ CCCL-88-14C, ANCHOR EØGIKEERIØG,
lUPUSD'fI.G DŒRALD BEACH APARTHE1rrs REQOESTIRG A VARIANCE nOM THE
COASTAL C0.5TROCTIO. COØTROL LIKE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 1M SECTIOM 18,
TOMWSBIP ð2S, RANGE 26E - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 23, 1988, as evidenc~d by Aftid3vit ot Publication tiled with
the Clerk, public hearing was openvd to consider Petition CCCL-88-14C,
tiled by Anchor Engineering, Inc. representing ~merald Beach
Apartaents requesting a variance trom the Coastal Construction Control
Line to replenish the existing rip-rap along an existing seawall and
to add large rocks to the existing revetment at Emerald Beach
Apartaents.
There were no speakers either for or against the subject petition.
~ssioner Pi. tor aoved, seconded by Co..i.sioner Goodnight and
carried UD&n~ly, that the public hearing be clo.ed.
~..ioner Pis tor moved, seconded by Co..i.sioner Goodnight and
carrl~ ~80U81y, that Petitlon CCCL-88-14C, be approv~, .. per
Statt rSCoaaendation, thereby adopting Resolution 88-278.
Page 26
_..~- h'_"
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
I~- rlA2
a&soLUTI08 88-27g, PETITIO. CCCL-88-lðC, ~CHOR EXGIIEERI.G,
a.I.rJt&a&.8TDrG ~SET CORPORATIOR or MARCO ISLAJrD, UQOUTIRG A 91
rooT VAlt.I.AJrC& I'JWIC 'fU. COASTAL CO.STROCTIOX COIITROL LIIE FOR A DOn
w.u..EDVD 0]( 'l'U SOMERsET COImOMIØIOM LOT AT 900 SOUTH COLLIER BLVD.,
MARCO ISLAJrD - ADOPTED
Legðl notice having been published in the Ha?les Daily News on
October 23, 1988, as evidenced by Attidavit ot PublicatIon filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition CCCL-88-15C,
filed by Anchor Engineering, Inc., representing Somerset Corporation
of Marco Island, requesting a variance of 91 feet from the Coastal
Construct 10n Control L 11;" .
allow for the construction of a dune
walkover on the S08erset Condo8inium lot located at 900 South Colller
Blvd., Marco Island, Florida. Section 19, Township 52 South, Range 26
East.
There were no speakers either for or agaInst the subject petition.
c-i..ioner Pi. tor lIOVed, seconded by eo..issioner Goodnight and
au-rle4 unanilloualy, that the public hearlng be closed.
c-i..ioner Pi. tor lIOVed, lMCon4ed by COII8i..loner Goodnight aDd
au-rled. UDaDiIIoualy, that Petition CCCL-II-15C, be approved, - per
Stat t rec4
ndatlon, thereby adopting Resolution 88-279.
Page 27
NOVEMBER 8, li88
It.. nA.3
azsoLOTI~ 88-280, PETITIO. CCCL-88-16C, ALLIED FEKCE PRODUCTS,
RZP1tESDTr.o THE GULrvIEM CLUB (&8 KORTH COLLIER BLVD., MARCO rSLAJID,
FLORIDA) REQUUTI.G AX 18 FOOT VARIAJfCE FROM THE COASTAL CO.STRUCTIOK
COJrTaOL LID TO ALLOW I'.JR THE nKCIøG OF AJf EXISTIØG SWIMMIKO POOL AJrD
PATIO u.u - ADOPTED.
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 23, 1988, as evidenced by Aftidavit of Publication tiled with
the Clerk, public he~rJng was opened to conRider Petition CCCL-88-16C,
t11~d by Allied Fence Products representing Gultview Club, requesting
an 18 toot variance tro.. the Coastal Construction Control Line to
allow tor the tencing ot an existing awi..ing pool and patio area tor
the Gulfvipw Club, b8 North Collier Blvd., Mðrco Island, Florida,
Section 18, T~lship 52 South, Range 26 East.
There were no speakers either for or against the subject petition.
ec-1_100er Pi.tor aov~, ..conded by Coaai.sioner Gooc:!nJght and
carried 1ID&n111OU81y, that the public bearing be closed.
e>-t..ion.er Pi.tor aoved, "conded by Co..i.sionet' Goodnight and
carried 1ID&ni80U81y, that Petition CCCL-88-16C. be approved, .. per
Statt rec:oaaendatlon, thereby adopting Reeolution 88-280.
Page 28
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
I~- nu
RESOLDTI08 88-281, PETITIO. V-88-14C, CHARLES W. -'XI.S, REQOBSTIBO
I1t.OJI'1' AJII) SIDE YARD VAJ\.l.AJrCES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED O. Tn .0R'l'BEAST
CORJID or CAPK FLORIDA L.AJrE AJfD CAPE DtJr1I1!:DY ROAD IØ Tn JlAPLES
MOBILZ UTAT1S PARX - A.1J9PTE..Pd__- ------- -----
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 23, 1988, as evidenced by Aftidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-88-14C,
filed by Hr. Charles W. Akins, requesting a variance from the required
front yard setback of 25 feet to 16.3 feet from the western property
boundary and 14.8 feet from the southern property boundary and a
variance tram the required side yard setback of 7.5 teet to 5.8 feet
to accoaaodate partially constructed patios and the proposed expansion
ot a carport in an MHSD zone for property described as Lot 7, Block C.
Naples Hobile Estates, located at the HE corner ot Cape Florida Lane
and Cape Kennedy Road, Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East.
Planner Lord stated that the subject request is being made to
obtain two tront and one side yard setback variances to allow an
exlsting porch in both front yards to be enclosed and to allow an
exIsting storage shed to remain at its present location.
He noted
that the property is zoned HHSD "Hobile Ho..e Subdivision District"
which allows mobile homes as a permitted use.
He indicated that the
property is a corner lot and, theretore, haA two front yards, two side
yards, and no rear yard.
Hr. Lord advised that the Petitioner purchased the mobile home In
February, 1987, and has since added a concrete front porch to the
south and west sides of the home, adding that the porch is not in
violation, but the addition of the walls and a roof would create a
structure that would be in violation at both front yard setbacks, and
reduce the vision of oncoming trattic at the corner; thus, creating a
setback from the property of approximately 10.5 teet.
He indlcated
that prior to April, 1987, an existing storage shed was constructed
which created a side yard violation; thus, creating a variance to
.llow this structure to rem~ln aft 1ft.
Page 29
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Mr. Lord stated that the Engineering Depart..ent states that the
proposed porch should be reduced in size to avoid a possible sight
line cont lict.
He advised that 4 letters have been received by neigh-
bors, with no o~jection to subject petition, and 1 letter ot opposi-
tion has been re~eived.
Mr. Lord advised that Staff has reviewed the subject request, and
based upon the criteria contained in the Zoning Ordinance, they are
reco...nding denial or thlft varianc~, finding that no land or struc-
ture related hardShip exists.
He noted that the CCPC heard this peti-
tion on Septeaber 28, 1988, and recoa.ended approval.
Co..i.sion~r Hasse stated that h~ visited the site, and he did not
find that the proposed extension would adversely atfect the neigh-
borhood.
Mr. Lord advised that the existing porch is less than 2' high off
the existing grade which is not a violation, but noted when the walls
and root are constructed, there will be a hazard tor oncoming trafflc.
Co..issioner Pistor indicated that he does not teel this variance
should be granted, adding that if one variance of this nature is
granted, other requests will soon tollow.
Mrs. Diane Burns stated that she is a friend of Mr. Akins, and
read a letter on his behalt requesting this variance.
She noted that
there are seven homes that rront Cape Kennedy Road, and none comply
with current zoning.
She indicated that no other residents ot this
subdivision have applIed for a before or after-the-fact variance, and
they are enjoying the same privileges that Mr. Akins is being denied.
Co8a1asioner Pis tor moved, seconded by Co..ls.ioner Goodnight and
carried unania0u.81y, that the public hearing be closed.
Co8ai..ioner Pi.tor moved, "conded by Co..i..ioner Saunders to
accept Statt reco"'ndatlon to deny Petition V-88-1..
Opon call tor
the qu88tion, the action tailed 2/3 (Co..issioners Haa.., GOOdnight
and 01... o~).
Co8ai.eloner Baa.. aoved, .econded by eo..ls.ioner GOOdnight and
crri~ 3/2 (eo_is.loner. Pl.tor and Saundar. oppo.ed), to approve
Petition V-88-14C, thereby adopting Reeolutlon 88-281.
Page 30
,,~.._--_...__..".. ,
NOVEMBER 8, 198a
It.. "A.5
RESOLUTIOR 88-282, PETITION V-88-12, DERISE F. GERDES, REQOESTIØG A
VARIAJlCE FROM THE REQUIRED REAR AND FROn YARD SETBAexs FOR PROPERTY
oø THE R°R'I1! SIDE OF THI~JLS~!.:f!::r-L LITTLE HIÇ!CORY SHORES - ADOPTED
:'~ç~: r.';~~ç~ ha','i~'J b,,"~!1 publish'!d in the l:ðIJl~s. D~ily News on
October 23, :~a8, ~S e~ldenced by Attidavit of Publicatlon filed with
the Cle~k, public h~~ring W~5 opened to consider Petition V-88-12,
tiled by ~enise p. Gerdes, requesting a v~riance of 10 feet from the
requi~eð 25 ~oo~ f~on> yard setb~ck and a 15 foot variance ~rom the
requi~ed 25 ~oot re~r yard setback in a RSF-4 zone for ~roperty
described as Lots 24 ~nd 25 of Unit 1, Block C, Little Hickory Shores,
located on the north side of Third St~~et, approximately 650 feet
south of Bonita B~~ch Roa~ ~nd approximately ~30 feet west of West
Avenue in Section 5, Township 4R <;nuth, R;u:g.. 75 E~st..
Planner Nadeau indici'o' er!. the req1.est of the Pet 1 tioner and noted
that in 1952 Unit ¡ of Li~tl" Hic;uJry Shore5 51lbdlvision was platted,
addin~ th~t it predated Collier çounty Zoning.
He stated that to the
north ot the subject property is Little Hickory Lagoon; property to
the so~th Is a priv~te neiçhborhood park; property to the west is
Block G, Lots 1-23,
He stated that the subject Petition, Lots 24 and 25, under present
confi~~ration, do not co~p:y with the 7,500 square foot lot area
requirement of the RSF-4 Di$trict regulations.
He stated that the
Petitioner has these lots under contract tor pUrChdfje, ~dding that in
CO~bi!1ing the two lots into one property,
it doe5 conform with the lot
area requirement..
He note¿ >hat under the cUrr~nt setb~ck standards
of a 2~ ~oot rear yard SptUiiC;': iind d 25 f(JOf
frunt yard setback, and
to maintain an 800 square ~oot st,Jcture size, a 10' x ao' structure
would have to b~ constructed on the property.
He advised that the
Petitioner is requestin~ ~ r~iir Yi'ord setback ot 25' to 10' and a front
yard setback of 25' to 15', so that ~ 9~'
long bï 35' deep structure
can be placed on Lot 24, and a portion of the structure will go across
:.0' 25..
::... stated thi'ot t:¡~ Pet:r":oner indJcated that Lot 25 will not
be sold.
He indicat,,=d rh"".. baser! on tho;- ù..¡::t~. (If the propert.., Sta~f
Page 31
--;?
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
does tind a land related hardship, and recoamended approval to the
CCPC.
Mr. Nadeau advised that the CCPC heard the Petition on October 6,
1988, and forwarded it to the Board ot County Commissioners with a
recoaaendation of approval (7/2).
He noted that there was not any
public co..ent at the public hearing; however, there was one letter of
opposition received citing the possibility ot an undesirable house
being constructed on the property.
Co..issioner Pistor stated that he has had conversations with the
owner. of Lot 23, and a Jetter hðs been received stating opposition to
this variance citing the lots as being too small to construct an
appropriate home, and values of surrounding hollies being decreased.
questioned whether a stipulation could be included, if this request ls
approved, that would indicate a portion of the house will be
constructed on Lot 25.
Mr. Nadeau repli~d affirmatively.
He noted that a building permit
would not be issued tor Lot 25, it in the event it was sold, as it
would not meet the requirements ot the Zoning Regulations.
Mr. Robert Blades, of 226 Third Street West, Hickory Shores,
stated that the subject lots were designed as boat lots in the origi-
nal plats, and sewer assessments were never paid.
He stated that he
does not believe the subject land can be tilled, since it has slipped
back 35' trom the canal.
He suggested that the County install rip rap
or a seawall on the north side ot the water, before the water gets to
the County right-ot-way.
Mr. Thomas Riddle of 275 Third Str~~t stated that the land in thls
area is washing away, and it is very narrow.
He stated that there is
a distance ot 45' trom the road to the water line.
He indicated that
these lots were exempt (rom the sewer assessmenlN because they did not
-.et a County requirement of lIIinlmum Biz... for a single tamily
dwelling.
He submitted a petition with 6~ signatures, opposing the
aubject variance.
He stated ne does not believe that a hardship
'xists, and urges the Board ot County Coamissioners to reject the
Page 32
He
..-.'Â
'-".--......."...,.. .....
NOVRMßRR 8, 1988
Petltion.
Mrs. Denise Gerdes, Petitioner, stated that she is purchasing the
.ubject property with the contingency of this variance.
She advised
that her home will be constructed 35' froe the road, and part of the
porch will be on Lot 25, which will also serve as her yard.
She indi-
cated that she plans to improve the erosion problem which has
occurred.
She stated that the proposed home will be 1,500 SF - 2,000
SF, and w~ll cost approximately $100,000.
She presented a copy of a
survey which retlects that the erosion that has taken place on the
property is mainly on Lot 25, and it Is not possible to build anything
on thls lot.
Co..issioner Rasse questioned whether a seawall would be feasible
along the northern property line?
Hr. Harl..;¡u nrl cat,.<1 that It would be appropr!;¡te, but the Corps
of Engineers would be the permitting agency.
Co..issioner Saunders questioned whether the petltioner 18 willlng
to agree to enter into a covenant that would run with the land, that
would not permit Lot 25 to be sold or built upon, and would agree to
the sewer assessments ot the subject lot, based on what the other pro-
~rty owners in the area had to pay?
Mrs. Gerdes stated that she is in agreement with the covenant of
the land, but was unaware of the Hewer asseRsments.
County Manager Dorrl11 stated that this sewer assessment project
is probably 20 years old, noting that the Subdivision built their own
sewers through an assessment method, where the residents pald to have
the sewers installed.
He indicated that it the Commission is going to
allow the variance tor purposes ot constructing a residence, Staft
will need to research the project files to determine what the
.sse.sable basi. was.
ec-J._ioaer Pi.tor aoved., eeconded by eo..i..iooer Goodzûght and
carried 1m8D18ou.ely, that the public hearing be clo8ed..
Co..i.sioner Pistor stated that he does not te~l that a variance
ot this size is appropriate for this area.
He indicated that It the
Page 33
------... .
l'
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
other homes in the area have 25' setbacks, it eeans that this hoee
will be much closer to the street which is not tair to the other resi-
dents of Little Hickory Shores.
C'~i~iODe1" Pi. tor lIOVed, eeconded by Co..i.eloner Baa- to deny
Petlt~ V-I8-12.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that the petitioner has agreed to
i8prove the lot to the property line and to have a seawall
constructed, noting that it will benetit the area.
She Indicated that
she feels that there is a land hardship.
Dpoa ~ll tor the qu_tion, the 8Otion tailed 1/4 (Coaals.1oner.
Ba8_, Goodnight, Gl... and Saunders opposed).
ec-1.sioner Goodnight lIOVed, ..conded by Ca..is.laner Gl..e ta approve
Petition V-88-12, with the understandlng that the Petitioner agrees
DOt to ..11 ott Lot 25; the proposed 00- is to be conatructed 80 that
it is situat~ on both lots; a seawall will be provided to correct
the eroelon prabl..; including stipulation. ot the County Man8ger
regarding the special connection charge at the sewer that similar lot.
were cbarve<S at the ti- of the original aa"s.-nt.
Hr. Blades stated that there is not sufficient land on the pro-
perty
to construct a home, the State will not allow a seawall to be
constructed, and they will not allow fill in that area.
Opon ~ll tor the question, the 8Otion carried 4/1 (Coaai..ioner
Pistor oppoeed), thereby adopting Reeolutian 88-282.
****5EE PAGES 71 E.1 - .2
It.. ',A6
a1SOLOTIO. 88-283, PETITIOK V-88-13C, MR. CRAIG R. WOODWARD
RURUD'rI.G DR. JAMES E. BLSOK, RBQOESTING A VARIAJfCE FROM THE
JlEQt1IJUtD non YARD SETBACJt FOR PROPERTY LOCATED OK THE .ORTIIEAST
CORJrER OF BALD L\GLE. DR!YE AJfD SUJfBIRD COURT (MARCO ISLAJrD) - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 23, 1988, as evidenced by Atfidavit ot Publication tiled with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-88-13C,
filed by Dr. James H. Nelson, represented by Woodward & Woodw~rd,
requesting a variance of 2.44 toot troe the required tront yard set-
Page 34
"',f
'-------"-""""'"
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
back ot 25 teet, for the purpose of completing the construction of a
.ingle-taaily home in a RSP-4 zone tor property described as Lot 17,
Block 16 ot Marco Beach, Unit 1, at the southeast intersection of
Sunbird Avenue and Bald Eagle Drive, Marco Island, Florida.
Planner Lord advised that this Petition is a request to obtain a
front yard setback variance to allow an existing single tamily resi-
dence to remain at its present size and location.
He noted that the
property is zoned RSF-4, wh!ch allows a single-tamily residence as a
principle use.
He indicated that the property is a corner lot, and it
has two front yards, two side yards, and no rear yard.
He noted that
the Petitioner was granted a permit to build a home on the subject
property in 1985, adding that the contractor of record at that time
went out of business, and Dr. Nelson engaged another contractor to
complete the residence.
He advised that on March 3, 1988, a per.it
was obtained trom the Building Department; however, when a survey was
pertoraed to obtain a Certificate ot Occupancy, it was discovered that
the front yard set back violation existed on Bald Eagle Drive.
He
stated that in May, 1988, the Board of County Co.missioners lssued a
temporary CO, subject to obtaining an after-the-tact setback variance.
Mr. Lord stated that the Planning Statf reviewed the subject peti-
tlon, and does not find that a land or structure related hardship
exists, and theretore, are recommending denial of the petition.
He
indicated that the CCPC held their public hearing and forwarded this
petition to the Board of County Coaaissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
Attorney Craig Woodward, representing Dr. James Nelson stated that
the house is completed and a temporary CO was issued by the Board of
County Co..18sioners on June 14, 1988.
He noted that the house does
meet one front yard setback on Sunbird, but it does not meet the other
tront yard setback on Bald Eðgle Drive.
He advised that a letter ot
no objection has been received fro. an adjacent neighbor.
There were no other speakers either for or against this Petition.
C<*8.i_ioner Pi.tor aoved, ..conded by Coaai..ioner Goodnight and
Page 3ð
KOVEMBER 8, 1988
carr1ad --d8nQ81y, that the public bearing be clo8ed.
C.-i..icmer Pi.tor aoved, seconded. by Co-.1..ioner Goodnight and
carri84 Dftafti8nQ81y, that Petltion V-88-13C be .pprav~, thereby.
aðopt~ a.aolu~ion 88-283.
Page 3&
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
...
Jteceae 12:01 P.M. - Reconvened: 1 :00 P.M. at which
tl.. Depaty Clerk Mendez replaced. Deputy Clerk Boffaan ...
It- ..&
MAJlITIJa V£JITud I REGARDIKG GOODLAJfD WATER DISTRICT COJOŒCTIOK - .0
ACTI 011
Mr. Michael ~. Stephen, representing Maritim~ Venture I and
Goodland Marina, noted that the Executive Summary includes a hydrologi-
cal engineering report which indicates that 750 gpm ot fire flow would
result with a pressure at the end ot the Goodland Water System of 29
psi.
He noted that Subdivision Regulations require a pressure of 20
psi.
He indicated since the last meeting the petitioner has obtalned
final site development plan approval from the County and the necessary
State and Federal permits have be~n acquired.
He referred to a letter
tro..~ltona Utilities, Inc. dated August 17, 1988 which acknowledges
their willingness to service the proposed project.
He noted that
recent water restrictions by the South Florida Water Management
District is not a moratorium but a resource management tool which
attects Collier and Lee Counties.
He indicated that the project will
ut\lize xeric native vegetation which uses a minimum ot water for
irrigation purposes.
He stated that the petitioner will abide with
all mandated restrictions and co~ply with the Utility Department's
reco_endations.
He noted that the builder has the option to Invest
$50,000 into the Goodland System or invest $150,000 which is the pro-
jected line connection cost to hook up to the Marco Island Utilitles,
Deltona Utilities, Inc.
He advised that the Water Supply Agreement
has been aaended to indicate that the connection charge ot $46,000
will be paid in tull to the Goodland District at the time of connec-
tlon.
Mr. Stephen concluded by asking that the Board approve the
request to connect to the Goodland Water District.
He noted that the
Board is tamiliar with the project, and has heard public coaments 1n
?revious meetings.
,In re.ponse to Commissioner Hasse, Utilities Administrator
Crandall contirmed that the hydraulic study indicated that 29 psi will
be maintained by the developer in order to meet Subdivision Regula-
Page 37
-~'-'."'. ....-. ..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
tlons.
Reterring to two cases affecting the water pressure in the
Goodland Water System, Commissioner Pistor asked it other such instan-
ces have recurred?
Hr. Crandall advised that a continued daily
problem is not experienced at the Goodland system, however, his only
recollection are the previously cited Cases: whe~ "Marco's facili-
ties fell off and when the w~ter was dumped to clean the tanks".
Mr. Jaaes J. Kornse, Goodland resident, expressed concerns about
Maritime's hook-up to the Goodland Water System based on the water
restrictions and water pressure problems presently in existence.
He
noted that the hook-up will eventually aftect the welfare and the
well-being ot Goodland residents.
Slnce the atorementioned issue is
80 critical, Mr. Kornse reco..ended that the new Board members be
given the opportunity to hear the petitlon and a determination not be
made be until such time.
Me. Betty Bruno indicated that with the present water restrictions
a project such as Maritime Venture should not be permitted, as It will
turther aggravate the water pressure in Goodland.
She suggested that
the Board seriously evaluate the Issue of such a monumental project
h~king up to the Goodland Water Syste..
Mr. Clarence Smith, President ot the Goodland Civic Association,
stated that he has unsuccesstully tried to obtain documentation from
the Planning, Zoning and Building Departments pertaining to the pro-
ject.
He stated that copies of the plans provided by the Board's
secretary are not complete, ðnd noted that the $46,000 is a ridiculous
amount to be paid, and the project should be assessed by the square
tootage.
Mr. Joseph W. Douglas, a volunteer Goodland Fireman, indicated
that the proposed project will deterior~te the water in Goodland, and
will adversely attect the tire tlows as there is presently not enough
water pressure.
He reiterated prevlous comments regarding the
xisting water restrictions in the area.
Me. Sandy Combs stated that it residents are being requested to
Page 38
~
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
retitrict water usage then commercial hook-ups should also be
restricted.
She noted that Goodland does not need another marina and
the County has to tigure out how water will be supplied to Marco
Island when the welltields go dry, and recommended that the petition
be denied.
Tape '3
Mr. Elhanon Combs presented the Board with a copy of the Zoning
Ordinance and stated that it the developer makes change~ to the Master
Plan he must appear before the Planning Commission and the Board tor
their deter.ination.
He noted that the ordinance outlines certain
criteria that has to be tollowed in order tor amendments or changes to
be made, and indicated that the petitioner has not complied with this
criteria.
Responding to Coaaissioner Saunders' question regarding the plans
and the zoning concerns, Acting Community Development Adminlstrator
Ollift advised that the developer has submitted a site development
plan wh1ch has been approved.
He noted that the plan complies with
the time restriction outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
Hs. Astrid Johnson stated that she wondered why the request for
hook-up to the GoorilarH] Wat..r SYAteIP hlt8 not h..en dented.
5he indi-
ca.ed that the denial should be based on the promise that no one out-
side the village would be hooked up to the system and on precedent,
since others have requested hook-up and have been denied.
Hr. George Keller, President ot the Collier County Civic
Federation, asked 1t th~ Board's direction regard1ng a report on the
environaental and land use impacts has been received?
Mr. Ollift
advised that Mr. Stephens has indeed provided Statf with an environ-
mental impact report, subsequently Statt prepared a report based on
the environ.ental impact in the area which basically indicated that
there are some negative environmental impacts.
However, the settle-
sent indicates that there w11l be a great trade-at! in regard to pre-
serve areas obtained and the agreement has been forwarded to the
'\card.
Mr.
Keller recommended that a determination not be "~e at
Page 39
.""".--..- .. ..~ ""-"'"
,--,.
--.,
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
the present tlae.
Mr. ~enneth R. Hunt reiterated that the new Co.~isslon should be
given the opportunity to hear the petltion and make a deteraination.
He stated that he would like to see Maritime's alternative water
source, and added that since larger developments have multi-units,
the cost tor a hook-up is less.
He noted that the amount being paid
i. out of line and should retlect on a per unit basis what Goodland
residents have already paid.
Responding to Co..issioner HaRse, Mr. Hunt At~ted that the project
will coapound the water proble. on Marco Island, not alleviate it.
In answer to Ms. Bruno, Mr. Ollitt reiterated that the developer
has coapleted th~ Bit~ development plan which d~llneates the site, the
locatlon ot the building, setbacks trom the roadways, etc. and It was
submitted three months ago.
Co..issioner Hasse asked what sources of water are presently
available?
Mr. Stephens responded that presently the alternative
source of water is the Marco Utility which serves throughout the Marco
area, who sell water to the County, who in turn dispense through the
Goodland system.
He n~ted that it will be advantageous to the County
it Harltiae Venture is allowed to hook-up to the Goodland system.
Responding to Comaissioner Saunders, Mr. Crandall advised that
the hook-up is subject to Farmers Hoae Ad.iniøtration approval and Mr,
Stephens has acknowledged same.
He noted that otticially the marina
is going to be outside the water district of Goodland and the water
and sewer district of Marco, and will require approval ot all
parties involved.
He advised that there are two pumping syste.. on
Goodland's storage tank, a variable speed pump that maintains the day
to day usage which meets Subdivision Regulation, the other pumping
system is tor tire flow demands and is only turned on when needed.
In
regard to Commissioner Saunders question pertaining to the fee being
~aid by the developer, Mr. Crandall indicated that the tee had been
Ilculated based on the transmission portion ot the line that runs in
tront ot Maritiae Venture.
He stated that it the developer had been
Page 40
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
in the assessment distriLt, more pipes would have had to be installed
by the County; the cost would have been greater and everyone involved
would have had to pay his share.
Referring to water use projections for si8ilar facilities,
Co..lssioner pistor questioned if the 5,000 gpd to a aaxiaua of 15,000
gpd would be a realistic figure for the marina project?
Mr. Crandall
advised that the atorementioned projections depend on the marina's
operation.
He stated that the hook-up would require approval from the
County as _11 as FaHA.
Co..i..ioner Hasse asked if there would be a problem if the marina
hooked up to the Marco system?
Mr. Crandall responded that the decl-
.ion to hook-up to the Marco .ystem has not b4en di.cu..ed with the
County Attorn~'. otfice.
Referring to the water moratorium imposed by the South Florida
Water Manage8ent District in Le~ and Collier County, Co..is,ioner
Saunders asked it there i. any r~levance in the atorementioned and the
Board'. decision in hooking up another user to the Goodland sy,te.?
Mr. Crandall advised that it the Board makes the same determination,
then a aoratorium on development would be declared in the area.
Co..lssioner Hasse stated that it would be appropriate for the new
Co..ission to participate in the decision ot the marina's hook-up to
the Goodland system.
Ms. Charlotte Westman, representing The League of Women Voters,
reterred to the "Water Supply Agreement" under Recitals asked the spe-
citic location of the marina.
Mr. Stephens advised that the marina is
located within the Marco Water/Sewer District.
County Attorney Cuyler confirmed for Commissioner Saunders that
the Board must either approve the connection or take no action at the
present time.
There was no action taken on this item.
It- ~ . '6Cð
COJISIDDATI08 or PARXS UD R.ECRJtATIOJIAL rACILITIES IMPACT nil:
oaDIJIAJICK AJID LIBJU.KT SYSTEM IMPACT I'D ORDI.UCE - COJITIJI'OBD TO
~~ 13, It'.
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 13, 198B as evidenc~d by Affidavit ot publication tiled with
Page 41
~~
KOVEMBER B, 19BB
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the e~lctment of .
Parks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance.
Mr. Randy Yeung of H~nderson, Young & Company, summarized the
Parks and Recreational Impact Fee Study as tollows.
He noted that in
the State ot Florida the methodology utilized to develop fees is based
on court cases.
He stated that three specitic rules apply based on
the tair share rules; the "nexus of benefit" rules; and the "credlts"
rules.
He stated that th~ fair share rules are attributable to new
growth, not on deficiency of existing tacilities; the nexus ot benetlt
rules requires a reasonable connection between the development that is
paying the tee ar.d the need tor !Such a fee; t:he credi ts rules requires
that any monies paid by development be taken into account which would
be used to build a new facility, and ascertains that impact fees are
not paid twice.
He stated that the impact tee is determined by cost
per capita; reduction of cost per capita by allowable credit, and by
converting the cost per capita into ~ost per dwelling unit.
He deU-
neated the atore..entioned in detail as described in the study pro-
vided.
Mr. Young then referred to the Library Impact Pees study which is
Itea6C5.
He noted that Pages 19 - 21 contain the calculations that
determine the library i..pact fee.
He said that Table 5, Page 21,
indicates that currently there are 2.59 persons per household In
Collier County which totals $179.72 for impact tees per dwelllng
unit.
Responding to Commissioner Sacnders, Mr. Young explained that
the previous study indicated that there were 2.42 persons per house-
hold and the original total was $172.78, however, the persons per
household have since increased to 2.59.
Mr. Young stated that Page 21 of the Parks and Recreational
Facilities study delineates the determining tactors in calculating
i.pact tees.
He noted that the impact tees involve regional and com-
aunity parks: regional parks serve the entire County, whereas
c'
unity parks serve only the unincorporated area.
He stated that
the cost tor regional parks is $75.99 and the cost tor comaunity parks
Page 42
._-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
is 8101.29 based on per capita.
He advised Commissioner Hasse
that the revenues raIsed from the Impact fee can be used at the new
facIlities as w~ll as for Improvements at the eKistIng beachtront
parks.
DIsplayIng a £~etch, Mr. Young indicated the districts
outlIned in "red" tor community parks and noted that the City of
"aples would not be contributing to the aforementioned type park since
It has its own community park, and the rural portions of the County
MOuld SILO ~ excluded.
He referred to Page 23 ot the study and
explained how the calculations were determined, noting that the
regional parks impact fee per dwelling unit would be $196.81 and for
the co..unity pftrks would be $286.46.
He indicat~~ that the County i8
permitted to charge impact fees based on the standards for levels of
service established, however, these standards do not apply to library
impact tees.
He noted that it will take a number ot years to bring
the County to the standards adopted and recommended that park fee
tigures be þhased-in rather than starting at a full amount, thus even-
tually c08ing up to the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.
Referring to Page 24, he notpd that the dollar valu~ has been applIed
to existing tacilities as well as projected programs tor the next six
fi8cal years.
He suggested that the impact tees be discounted as long
as the County Is below the standards for the next tive years and con-
tinues to grow into the standard.
He indIcated that a chart on Page
25 shows the proposed discounting schedule trom 1988 - 1994 and
explaine~ how the discount rate would decrease trom year to year until
it MOuld eventually disappear.
He noted that the impact fee tor
regional parks goes ~ro.. $128.00 to $191.00; the same formula applies
to coaaunity parks as indicated on the chart.
He stated that the
chart also shows the impact fee" that will be paId inside the City tor
regIonal parks, as well as the impact tees to be paid by the unincor-
porated area for both the regional and the community parks.
Mr. Young confirmed for CommIssioner Saunders that the impact tee
~r Fiscal Year 1988-19Hq tor the regional park would be $128.00 and
tor the community park would be $252.00.
He noted that the net impact
Page 43
'! ),
m.."'" "-"-"---
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
tee for the regional and community parks is $380.00.
Responding to Commissioner Pistor regarding the inclusion of
awi..lng pools in every park when the Comprehensive Plan indicates
that only one awimminp pool would be placed in a specific area, Mr.
Young advised that Page 16 fully details this aspect of the study.
He
noted there will not be a awimming pool in ~very park; the standard
was converted trom number of parks per capita to a dollar per capita
standard.
He noted that the standard in the Comprehensive Plan is in
tact a dollar figure.
He advised that the amount of money that a new
development has to pay is the total ot the set standard per capita
e.g. in a particular park that money might be used entirely for a
awi..ing pool, however, in another park the same amount could be used
for basketball and picnic set with no swi..ing pool.
Reterring to the aap, Comaissioner Goodnight indicated that Phase I
ot the coaaunity park in I..okalee has been implemented and asked Mr.
Young it Phase II is not considered to be a deticit but considered to
be the growth?
Mr. Young responded that the amount ot money put into
the park has to be a certain amount of dollars per capita to meet the
.tandard, however, if the park meets the standard tor the current
population then any more money put into the park can be charged to new
growth.
Com.lssioner Goodni~ht
Indl.-.at...d that two new parks are pro-
jected through Growth Management, one to be on the East Trail and the
other in the Golden Gate Estates area, which are not shown on the map.
Mr. Young stated that both of these parks have been included as a
District.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that ~
~:ng the impact fee will not
take care ot the detJcit in Immokalee, East Naples, North Naples and
in the Golden Gate areas, and noted that it should be used to build
new parks and not to bring existing parks to the standards set tive or
six years ago.
Mr. Young indicated that the dollars per capita gives
the County the legal right to charge the money and utilize it where it
is needed.
He stated that in Marco I~land there is a comaunity park
It already has a total investment that substantially exceeds the
Page 44
ßl
........--.....,,-..-........ ...""--""'-"--'
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
standard of $122.00 per capita, therefore, he reco..ended that Marco
Island be exempt from the community park impact tee.
Respondinç to Coamissioner Hasse, Mr. Young advised that County
Attorney Cuyler had requ~Ated hiR firm to implem~nt a study on four
impact tees, which Statt is presently reviewing.
He noted that the
only impact fee tor which a recommendation has not been initiated per-
tains to the School Board.
Mr. Greg Stewart of the firm ot Nabors, Giblin, Stetfens and
Nickerson, stated that Mr. Younç and he have been attemptlng to draft
an ordinance to implement Mr. Young's study on impact tees.
He stated
that the ordinance balances the needs on Intrastructure; protects the
home builder and persons most atfected by increased fees on affordable
hou.slng.
He stated that the tee tor both the Parks and Recreational
Facilities and the Library I..pact Fee Ordinance will be collected at
the time the buildinç permit is pulled and will be imposed on dwelling
units.
He stated that it a developer teels that his development does
not have the same impact as other developments, then he can subalt an
alternative study to the Board.
He stated that the County can allow a
private tira to construct a library or a park tacility In lieu of
payment ot the impact tees.
He noted that the library fee does not
allow contribution for collection items such as books, audio visual
etc. which do not offset the cost of the library system.
He stated
that it the Comprehensive Plan is adopted, the Ordlnances are required
to be reviewed annually since resources might change.
He reiterated
Mr.
Young's statement regarding the districts and the imposltion of
both the Park and Recreational Impact and Library Fees.
He proposed
that the assistance of the ..unicipallties be requested in the collec-
tion ot fees for building permits that are pulled within the City
11mits .
He indicated that this procedure has been implemented by
other Counties whereby when building permits are issued, the County's
fees are cc'lected and transmitted to the County.
He Indicated that
the Ordinances have an immediate ettective date, however, the Board
'st consider it a staggered etfective date will be utilized In order
Page 40
r¡ß
.,"... .-...,.---...-.....-.--
NOVEMBRR 8, 1988
to give the City time to review and consider an interlocal agreement
for the collection the tees.
He stated that an atfordable housing
section has been incorporated into the Ordinance.
He stated that an
exemption has been .ade for any dwelling unit which is going to be
8old or rented tor an amount adopted by the Board and which i8 tunded
in whole or in part by a government grant.
He stated that the other
alternative within the attordable housing is the reimbursement provi-
sion which relates to privately tunded construction, which would be
restricted either through a governmental/development agreement or by
deed restriction.
He stated that in a rental situation the reimbur-
8e8ent would be based on 1/7 of the impact tee over a period of seven
years.
Responding to Co..lssioner Hasse, Mr. Stewart advised it i8 i.por-
tant to encourage attordable housing, however, the County will pay the
impact fee tor tees that are exempt or reimbursed.
Referring to the
sketch, he stated that the various districts are based upon the stan-
dards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan which have a service area of
3 8iles or a 25,000 population.
Co..issioner Pistor asked what the advantage of collecting money
fro. a developer would be It it is going to be reimbursed?
Mr.
Stewart advised that persons may not claim reimbursements of rents
over years and there may be breeches of agreements which will result
in additional costs by the County.
He stated that the atfordable
housing provisions are not a requirement by the law, but should a
developer breech his agreement the County should not have to bear
any additional costs.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that the Board
is not required to adopt an affordable housing section in the ordi-
nance, and the credits and exemptions given are not full exemptions.
He noted that the monetary figures are not contained in Appendix H,
"Attordable Housing" section ot the Ordinance.
Mr. George Keller suggested that the Ordinance have a provision to
allow the impact tee to be adjusted based on actual population growth,
not estimated population.
Mr. Stewart advised that this provislon is
Page 46
",-,--.,-,.-.".,-.--"""
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
already contalned in the Ordinance.
Mr. Willie Anthony stated that 10ng-ti88 County residents should
not be punished by paying an impact tee.
He indicated that impact
fees would result in citizens not being able to atford a house; there
should be a better system whereby residents can pay for infrastructure
needs and not be burd~ned, and whereby newcomers will not be
discouraged fro. moving to Collier County.
Co..issioner Saunders explained that the reason impact fees are
being di.cussed is to primarily determine a fair way to spread the
cost ot intrastructure needs.
He noted that the County's source of
revenue is comprised of user fees, ad valorem taxes and i..pact fees.
He indicated that revenues have to be co~bined and it is appropriate
to use impact tees to tund infrastructure needs necessitated by new
people aoving into the coa.unity.
He stated that the atorementloned
i. a method to aake the County an attordable place to 11ve.
Tape ,.
Mr. Ira Evans expressed concerns about the adoption of the Impact
Pee Ordinances and noted that taxpayers should not be burdened with
impact tees.
He stated that citizens have not been kept abreast of
all the aspects of the Ordinances as written.
He noted that it should
be determined it a "higher level of service" is practical, affordable
and necessary.
He indicated that the new co..ission will have to
deter.ine if the new facilities delineated in the proposed Ordinances
are necessitated.
He stated that Japact fees address capital expen-
diture wh1ch requ1re expertlRP and knowledge 1n trying to administer
.....
He noted that the adapti~n of such Ord1nances are preaature and
should not be adopted in their present for., as Growth Management
decislons are still being reserved.
He suggested that the Board defer
taking action as the proposed Ordinances are not presently needed and
further studying should be conducted.
Ms. ~ee Layne, representing the Napl~s' Area Board of Realtors,
.tated that they have ..ixed feelings about the adoption of the pro-
po.ed Iapact Pee Ordinances tor parks and libraries.
She noted that
Page 41
-'..'-"-"-"-"--"-. .' .
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
the Growth Hanagement Plan's financing should be done by a combination
ot impact tees, ad valorem taxes and local option sales tax.
She
suggested that the Board not adopt the Ordinances until the Growth
Hanage.ent Plan is adopted, since the levels of service will possibly
be reduced.
She stated that all residents should be included and no
exceptions be given.
She stated that it is the Board of Realtor's
contention that vacant property owners have already paid their fair
share towards the needed facilities and should not be taxed again.
She stated that the Board should Lonsider the possibility ot allowing
the fees to be paid over a ten year period which would alleviate the
burden 00 homeowners.
Attorney Bruce Anderson asked what percentage of the County's
population uses the library syste..?
Library Director Demarest advlsed
that the criteria provid~d by the organizations tor library collection
is based on a per capita tigure.
He indicated that presently there
are 46,000 registered borrowers which represents 38 - 40~ of the popu-
lation.
Mr. Anderson stated that library i.pact fees should be
li.ited for land acquisition and construction costs. not for books,
records, tapes and magazines which are readily available at retail
stores.
Referring to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee, Hr. Anderson
pointed out that since businesses benefit trom tourisa, they should
share in the cost of the facilities and the burden should not tall on
new h08eowners.
Mr. Anderson questioned it areas owned by Federal and
State governments and public-.inded agencies are included in the
calculations for what is needed tor parks?
He indicated that there
i. no provision in the Ordinance for reli~ving th~ hoaeowner of paying
an i.pact tee for tacilities he will not utilize.
He stated that ad
valoree taxes should continue to be used tor libraries, parks and
recreational tacilities and the use ot i.pact tees should be reserved
for necessities that everyone utilizes and benefits trom.
Rec... 3: 10 p... - Reconvened 3: 20 p...
Hr. David C. Graham noted that he is knowledgeable with i.pact fee
Jcoce.dings as he hal!f t.....en 1nvolved 011 d1tr...rt'".,,1 COlIl/llittees relating
Page 48
q¡
e......' .".... ..................-.."..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
to same.
He ~Iggested that the Board review the Manatee Impact Fee
which includes water and sewer, schools, etc. and everyone in the
County pays his fair phare.
He noted that impact í~es should be part
of a comprehensive program to determine how growth management and
infrastructure needs will be aanaged over the next several years.
He
concurred with the cl~use delineating affordable housing in the
County.
Responding to Commissioner Pistor's suggestion about the possible
placing of money collected trom empty lots into an escrow account tor
intrastructure and growth aanagement, Mr. Graham noted that the con-
cept would be a good one, but noted that a mechanism must be imple-
aented without having to impact citizens.
Mrs. Charlotte West~n, representing the League of Women Voters,
concurred with Mr. Graham's statement pertaining to the Growth
Management Study.
She stated that the League has been supportive of
previously imposed impact tees.
She stated that the new Board of
County Co..issioners should be given the opportunity to consider the
adoption ot the proposed Library and Parks and Recreation Iapact Fee
Ordinances.
She indicated that the League supports the impact fees as
well as aftordable housing, and the low entrance fee.
She referred to
Appendix "A" ot the Library Impact Fee Ordinance and indicated that
the figures are not delineated in this section, however, the Growth
Manageaent element specifically includes affordable housing co a-
putations and what constitutes same.
She emphasized that the League
would support the impact tees at a tuture date.
Mr. Gary Carlson, representing Collier County Builders anG
Contractors Association, Inc.
(CCBCA) , read an endorsement dated
Wovember 8, 1988 outlining their position in implementing Parks and
Library Impact Fees.
He suggested that ad valorem taxes not be tro-
zen; that the Board vote "Yes" tor a one cent sales tax, and new
construction be put on the tax rolls at the time of Certificate ot
Occupancy rather than waiting up to one year.
He indicated that the
CCBCA objects to the distinction between regional and community parks
Page "9
.............---.-.--..'-
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
a. it is an unnecessarily burdenso.e and unrealistic.
He stated that
unle.s this distinction is analogous to the use ot parks in the
County, the two separate impact tees should be reduced and assessed as
one general park impact fee.
He indicated that the projected costs of
the parks and libraries to be created and supported by these impact
fees should be clearly set forth in the ordinances.
He further indi-
cated that the .oat bothersume provision in the ordinances ls the
refund provision requiring a home3Wner to request repayment of impact
fees collected.
He concluded by stating that the CCBCA would support
the proposed ordinances if changes wer~ incorporated into the ordinan-
ces as indicated in Alternatives "A" and "B" ot the endorsement.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Young advised that the
staggered payments over a ten period would be problematic as sub-
sequent buyers can be charged with an extra assessment and impact tees
should not be put on tax bills.
He stated that the biggest problem
MOuld be that it will not satisfy the Growth Management Act as
infrastructure has to be in place and if it is staggered over a ten
year period, the County will have to borrow the money to pay for the
Intrastructure.
He noted that automatically having the rebate in
place would not create any legal problems and if the property has been
sold, then the impact tee can be paid or encumbered within six years.
Co..issioner Pistor indicated that the adoption of a Parks Iapact
Pee Ordinance should be initiated after comments from the State
regarding the Growth Management Act are reviewed.
He noted that there
are iteas within the Ordinance that will probably be eliminated which
will alter the calculations ot the impact fees.
Commissioner Saunders
DOted that the Ordinance retlects the current level of service.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that she is not prepared to vote in
tavor ot impact tees as she needs to fully review all the aspects ot
the study in order to make a determination.
Commissioner Glass stated
that although Impact tees are necessary, he concurred with
Co..i.sioners Goodnight and Pistor that turther review must be con-
ducted prior to adoption ot the Ordin~nces.
Commissioner Hasse con-
Page &0
'"'"
~... ---."-",.",."--""",,,,,
H~VEMBER 8, 1988
curred that i.plementation of the impact tees should be initiated at a
later date, in order to give the Board the opportunity to revise the
study and the new Board an opportunity to participate.
Co_issioner
Saunders stated that the Ordinances be adopted as the County's deficit
would increase it Impact Fees are not implemented.
As it was the con-
sensus ot the Board to continue the discussion ~t Some tuture date,
County Attorney Cuyler advised that a motion in that respect be ini-
tiated.
c.-~.-l0D8r 1Ia8.. lIOVed, 88C0D4ed by Coaaiaeioner Goodnight that
t..be iu. be tabled.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that the public hearlng had not be
closed.
c-1-1cmer Baaae lIOVed, aeconded by Coaaisaloner Goodnight ao4
carried. 4/1 Co8a1_1oner SaUDdera oppoa.ed that the public hearing be
cloeed..
Co..issioner Saunders asked for a definition of the term "tabled"?
County Attorney Cuyler advised th~t with the atorementioned motion,
the item would be deleted fro~ the Agenda and brought back at the
Board's direction.
Commissioner Hasse indicated that a specific date
should be deter~ined to further discuss the item.
Commissioner
Goodnight Indicated that continuing the item at a later date would
give the Board time to tully review the Ordinances.
County Attorney
Cuyler advised that th.... it..... could b.... contin..~d for five -eka and
after that time it would have to be readvertise; the public hearing
was then re-opened.
ec-1-i0D8r 1Ia8.. aoved, "conded by Co..i.aioner Piator ao4
carried. 1maA18J'U81y, that the public hearing on the Iapact r..
Ordt~.. be reop.ned and scheduled tor Deceaber 13, 1188.
It- na2
DC&VATIO. PKJQ(Ir .0. 61.204 - SEA CO. QUARRY (AU SAM>D.S PIT) -
IIQtD or Q&AL PALM ROAD - APPROvED
Public Works Administrator Archibald st~ted that the petitioner
¡:
'poses to modity Excavation Permit No. 59.204 to allow for an
Page 61
--.-.--__...-e..
---...
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Increase in permitted lake area from 19 to 29 acres and increase the
permitted depth troa 20 to 30 feet below existing ground.
He noted
that the expansion would be within the existing 36 acre parcel and
will produce approximately 1,100,000 cu. yds. ot aatarial for off-site
.ale.
He noted that the W~ter Manageaent Advisory Board recoamends
approval of the excavation perait and a lengthy 1iscussion transpired
at the meeting of Octob~r 17, 1988 regarding excavation per.its.
He
noted that the location of the excavation being 3 1/2 miles east of
C.R. 951 has etfectuated in concerns to the water table conditions,
however, the proposed excavation complies with the Excavation
Ordinance, and other excavations in the imaediate area.
Based on the
aforeaentioned, Mr. Archibald recommended that the proposed aodifica-
tion be dpproved.
Responding to Coamissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald advised that a
water quality monitoring program will be implemented, thus allowing
the County to change the depth, if needed.
Referring to the Executive Sumaary, Co..issioner Pistor asked if
-30 feet below existing ground and elevation ot -20.5 teet ngvd" had
the saae definition.
Mr. Archibald advised that currently the land
elevation is 9.5 ngvd and the difference between this figure and -20.5
teet ngvd is approximately 30 feet below existing ground.
Co..issioner Pistor expressed concerns about the excavation's proxl-
aity to the Marco Island's w~ter supply.
He noted that recently a
test was conducted at a lake near Manatee Road which indicated that 30
foot levels result in stagnate water.
He noted that the pit has a
higher salinity level than surrounding pits and he would feel sater it
the excavation proposal was implemented in a couple of years, after
Daltona Utilities finds another source at water supply or agrees to
use County water.
He stated that Daltona is currently pumping 7.ð
million gallons of water a day to Marco Island; their maximum capa-
city is 8 million gallons a day and it will take approximately tour to
five ye~rs tor them to hook-up to the County system.
Hr. Archibald
reassured that the applicant as well as Staff have addressed the
Page &2
cp
. "-'""-"'--""~"-'-
----
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
atoreaentioned concerns.
He noted that salt intrusion does not exist
at the location and the most important concern is to ascertain that it
i. on the shallow water and oft the strata which extends to a depth of
45 - 50 feet.
He reiterated that the monitoring program will indicate
if a problem e~ists.
Co..is.ioner Goodnight stated that she had previously voted in
favor of the excavation since the petitioner had agreed to implement
i8proveaents to Sabal Pal. Road and residents were intormed that a
certain aaount ot soil would be removed, however, she noted that she
is opposed to the proposed moditication.
In response to Coamissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald advised that pre-
viously the bottom elevation was -10.5 feet and the proposal is to
increase the depth by 10 feet.
Co..issioner Glass indicated that he
supported Mr. Archibald's recommendation as some ot the water would be
retained with the expansion ot the lake area, and Deltona Utillties
feel. this could be a potential water source tor Marco Island.
Mr. Al McElwain stated that Sea Con Quarry runs a good operation,
works well with its neighbors, has rebuilt Sabal Palm Road to 30 teet
wlde with bike paths and walkways, and provides the community wlth the
needed till material.
Mrs. Charlotte Westman reterred to Item 6 of the Excavatlon Permit
Standards Conditions and asked Mr. Archibald it the modificatlon would
require a blasting permit and it there is a ~ecurity Bond?
Mr.
Archibald advised that the petitioner i. currently blasting on .ite
and there is a Security Bond which has been provided by Letter of
Credit .
Co8ai_Iemer Goodnight aoved, 8eCooded by Co_iealemer PI.tor aDd
carr1e4 2/3, ec-J..aioner. Gl..., Pi.tor and Saunders oppoeed, to deny
.. LwâtiOD Permit .0. Oi.204.
ec-J...loner Gl... 8OVed, _conded by Co..ieeloner Baa- and
carried 3/2, CoaaJ._loner. Goodnight and Pistor opposed, to apprave
.
o4ilied Excavatlon Permit .0. &9.204 to Se. Con Induatrl.., Inc.
lor 8Sea Con Quarry-.
Page &3
-.. .....H._._..."--.' .
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
I~ '9Cl
STATUS or IEGOTIATIO.S WITH THE MILLON ROW TROST rOR THE ACQOISITIo.
or A aaGIOJIAL PAIUt AXD COJI'TIJroED PURSUIT or PARX SIn: - APPROVED
Public Services Administrator O'Donnell advised that subsequent to
the last update of August 2, 1988, the Real Property Department has
secured appraisal reports trom Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc.
and St~art « Stephan, Inc. as delineated in the Executive Summary.
He stated that County Attorney Cuyler has sent a non binding "Letter
of Intent" to Mr. Joseph Bonness !ndicating the County's continued
interest in the acquisition of the park site.
He noted that the Real
Property Departaent has sent letters of inquiry to the owners of two
parcels ot property that are adjacent to the land owned by Willow
Trust and considered in the appraisals.
He noted that a positive
response has been received troa one of the property owners, and Staff
is awaiting a response trom the other property owner.
He Indicated
that the teras betwe~n WIllow Run Trust and Clyde C. Quinby remain the
saae, however, the closing date has been extended to November 28,
1988.
He stated that Staft has contacted H.R.S. regarding the water
quality tor swi.ming and non-swimming activities, and have been
inforaed that a plan and application prepared by a Protessional
Engineeer for hydrography, a sanitary survey and bacteriological sur-
vey is required for public bathing.
He advised that Staff has not
initiated the aforementioned until turther Board direction.
He noted
that tho Growth Management Plan calls tor the acquisition of 700 acres
ot ~egional park land by 1994, and the proposed acquisition of 490
acres would bring the County up to standards by the 1992.
He advised
that the County's Finance Committee has recommended that the regional
acquisition be considered as part ot a General Obligation Bond, and
reiterated that Start is awaiting further Board direction.
In response to Commissioner Saunders' question about the acqulsi-
tion ot the land and the financing, Mr. O'Donnell advised that the
location of the property 1s an ideal site, Willow Run Trust's plan
includes the development of two lakes, uplands, ..enities such as
Page 54
q1
...
~
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
overnight camping, canoeing, etc. which will comply with the standards
of a regional park.
In regard to the financing, he reiterated that it
would be part ot a General Obligation Bond, and a Willow Run Trust
representative Mas present to discuss this issue.
Co..issioner Pistor advised that the other property owner had con-
tacted hi. and intoraed him that she would be willing to sell her pro-
perty for $70,000.
Attorney Dudley Goodlette ot Ct._ings and Lockwood representing
Willow Run Trust, stated that the goal in the Recreation and Open
Space Area ot the Growth Management Plan is to provide sutficlent park
and recreation tacilities and open space areas for residents and visi-
tors of the County.
He referred to Policies 1.1.1 and 1.3 and sum-
aarized its contents which delineate park and beach facilities.
He
contiraed that by 1992 the County must have acquired 700 acres of land
tor regional park tacilities.
He noted that because of the escalatlng
land cost~ that the regional park acreage must meet the needs of the
population by the year 2000, however, this acquisition should be inl-
tiated within the next five years.
He read portions of the R/UDAT
.tudy which was conducted in April of 1987 which identifies I-7ð and
C.R. 951 as a potential location for a regional park.
Referring to a
sketch, Mr. Goodlette stated that the property in question contains
470 acres of which 150 acres will be utilized for water related
recreational uses.
He stated that there is a tuture access point
which can be obtained in the future.
He noted that the property is
i..ediately adjacent to and north ot Florida Sports Park.
He indi-
cated that the property is currently being utilized tor water aanage-
aent and a quarry operation, and the land presently not being .ined
can be acquired by the County.
He stated that Willow Run Trust feels
that the location is ideal tor a regional park, and is willing to sell
the property to the County at $9,500 per acre, which is the mean bet-
ween the $9,000 and $10,000 appraised values.
He noted that Coastal
~ineering had indicated that there are 489.24 acres; Stewart &
Stephan had indicated 491.49 acres, however, Willow Run Trust .sti-
Page 55
.~ ._.~....~..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
aate. there are about 488 acres on the site.
He advised that the
acquisition ot the land would total S4.2-.illion; $1.8-.illion would
be paid at closing; the balance of $2,400,000 would be spread over two
years. with two principal pay.ents, and a 5-3/4' interest rate would
be accrued on the unpaid balance.
In response to Comlllissioner Hasse, Mr. O'Donf!ell indicated that
Sealnole, Wiggins State and 8arefoot Beach State Parks are taken into
consideration but the County stan¿ard iø set up so that the 700 acres
iø retlected as what th~ County will have and operate.
Mr. Goodlette noted that there are two detinitlons in the
Recreation and Open Space element of the Growth Managelllent Plan, one
defines a regional park which Is a park that serves an area with a
service radius ot about 60 miles, and th~ oth~r is a regional park
reserve which detines an area ot natural quality tor nature oriented
outdoor recreation.
Mr. George Keller asked when the land could be acquired?
Mr.
Goodlette responded that it can be acquired by Novelllber 21, 1988.
Mr.
Keller indicated that he had no objections to the construction of a
reglonal park, but to the time span involved in the acquisition of
saae, and the cost involved.
Mr. Ji. McGee stated that atter listening to the discussion per-
talning to the water aanagelllent, the potable water, and the aining
being pertorllled on the site, the real decision the Board had to ini-
tiate is in the tunding ot the acquisition ot the land to construct
the regional park, and he recommends that a tavorable decision should
be implemented.
Mr. Bob Moates stated that property costs continue to rise and
there are .ore people visiting the County and the location is ideal.
He noted that a regional park is needed in Collier County and the
price is a traction ot a cost of what it will be in future.
He recolII-
aended that the Board approve the proposed regional park project and
indicated that the quote and terms being provided are a barg.ln.
County Manager Dorrill presented the Board with a hand-out and
Page ð6
~
""-'-""'.-"-'-' ..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
stated that it indicates the ad valorem county-wide support tor all
Growth Manageaent projects by category tor a period of tive years.
Reterring to the 1990 column of the hand-out, Mr. Dorrill indicated
that there is not enough money next year to undertake the current
progra...
He noted that by the end ot the current year there will be
a S4-aillion reserve.
He stated that the piece of property in
question is extre~ely deslrable and would be ~n Jdeal location tor the
proposed regional park.
Mr. Dorrill stated that the present offer might not be available
tor very long, as the owner will probably sell the site for the
construction of residential dwellings.
He noted that the Growth
Management Plan iódicates that the project would be contingent on a
reterendua, however, if the reterendum does not pass, it would result
in a regional park being deleted tro. the level of service or by
using other revenues.
He stated that it the Board desires to purchase
the property, a better deal would have to made by the seller as the
County can only attord twenty-four months of tinanclng.
He Indicated
that presently there is $4 million of sales tax to lower ad valoree
taxes in the County's General Fund and noted that the new Board does
not want to ralse taxes.
He noted that the project can be implemented
by deterring other capItal improvements and he Indicated that he
needed Board direction if they wanted the regional park.
Co..issioner Saunders stated that although he felt the County
should purchase the piece ot property, the Board cannot be under the
assumption that Library and Park Impact Fees will be in place.
Mr.
Dorrill reiterated that other projects would have to be deterred to
purchase the land or the new Board would have to raise ad valorem
taxes to handle the capital improvement programs.
In response to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Dorril1 indicated that the
present deal requires that the County deplete the park and recreatlon
reserve r' ,1.8-.il1ion.
He stated that a Sl.8-million deficiency
will be added it the reserve is used.
He stated that consideration
to'
ld have to be initiated to eliminate the 3rd tloor shell to the
Page ð7
tÞ
..........,..... ..".. ......-..--"""". ,..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
new Public Service and Health Building, and cancelling the elevator
tor the building; the Lely EMS would have to be deferred for one year,
and the renovation of Building "A" would have to be deferred for a
year.
He noted that t:1e chart indicates that it the County continues
to be prudent, sutticIent tunds wIll be available in the next couple
ot years that can be applied to beach renourish.ent or other projects.
ec-i_iooer aa.se 8OVed that the project be set ..ide .. the
Board i8 unable to pur.ue it due to tinanclal probl....
Coaaissioner Glass stated the Mr. Dorrill be given the flexibillty
to turther review the proposed project and noted that it should not be
terainated and should be brought back for further consideration.
Co..lssloner Goodnight stated that although she supports the con-
cept of a
regional park, she is not willing to eli8inate other pro-
jects that the Board has committed to implement.
She suggested that
Mr. Dorrill further discuss the tinancial problem with Willow Run
Trust and present the determinatIon made at a later date.
eo..issioner Saunders suggested that the aforementioned motion be
changed, directing Statt to continue discussions with Willow Run Trust
and It a meaningtul way of tinancing is determined then Mr. Dorrill
will present it to the Board.
Co..issioner Hasse requested that the northern portion be looked
into as as well as the additional 200 acres previously mentioned.
C'~t..i0D8r II&88e 8OV~, seconded by Co8ai88ioner Goodnight and
carr~ 8D8Ai80U81y, directing Staft to contlnue discua8i0D8 wIth
WIllow Ibm Truat to determIne if the acquI.i tion of the land can be
tt....~.
I~~2
DISCVaSIOJI u: TO CO.STROCTI08 or A R.EGt1LATI08 BASEBALL rIELD UD
a\Jr~ rACILITIU AT GOLDa GATE COMMtJJfITY PARX - APPROVED
Public Service Administrator O'Donnell requested authorization to
design the construction of a regulation baseball field and support
facillties at the Golden Gate Community Park.
He stated that th. pro-
j,
, is included within the Golden Gate Community Park master plan and
Page 68
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
the Growth Management indicates a deficiency of three baseball fields
for the existing population.
He stated that Staff has received peti-
tien. tro. baseball leagues requesting the developaent of baseball
tield.
He noted that the cost ot the baseball tield would be approxi-
aately $358,600 ~nd can be in operation by July, 1989.
He suggested
that the project be tinanced by transferring funds from 306 reserves
to the 301 fund.
He stated that the Golden Gate Community Park is a
central located for a baseball fie~d as indicated in the petitions
recelved, which also suggested a baseball field be located in North
"aples.
County Manager Dorrill clarified that the item being discussed
does not have anything to do with the previous item.
He noted that
the proposal is to build Phase II, which is to include amenities at
the coaaunity park.
Co..isaloner Plstor indicated that he has has received several
calls fro. North Naples' residents requesting a baseball field slnce
the leagues travel to Ft. Myers two or three times a week to play
ball.
He stated that Horth Naples pays over three times as much taxes
as Golden Gate and the tirst consideration should be glven to thls
area.
He stated that the first baseball field should be constructed
in Korth Naples and consideratIon given to putting another fIeld in
Golden Gate.
eo--t..ioner P18tor 8OV~ that if one ball park is constructed it
abr:nù.cI be ¡Nt in .orth ..plee and It two parka are COIUItructed. one
abr:nù.cI be put in .orth .aple. and the other in Golden Oate, otberwi..
DOt bailt at all.
Mr. Ji. Richardson contirmed tor Commissioner Goodnight that the
leagues In the County are comprised of "kids" trom allover the
coastal area and do not concentrate to a specific area, and the Golden
Gate area is the mostly centrally located.
CommissIoner Goodnight
stated that she does not have a problem with building one ballfield
b!. year and instructing Staff to build anuther ballfield next year.
She stated that there is a deticit of ballfields and Iamokalee got
Page ð9
\êL
-_.,-,._.,,--~ ..-..,
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
the first ballfield.
She stated that under the clrcumstances the
ballfield should be built at the mostly centrally located area and
Staff should be instructed to build the other ball field In North
Jfaple..
Co..is.ioner Hasse agreed that since Golden Gate Community Park is
centrally located it will be convenient to the children playing on
the leagues.
He stated that balltields are needed at all of the
parks.
Mr. Richardson advised that last year the leagues had to tra-
vel to Bonita Beach and Ft. Myers because the County does not have the
field .pace.
Ms. Donna Hihailott, President of the Babe Ruth Baseball League,
emphasized the i~portance of constructlng parks.
She 8tated that the
pre8sure i8 getting greater as the leagues Increase In size.
She
indicated that she had spoken to the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board as well as to each Co.missioner and intormed the. that there is
not a baseball field in Collier County.
She stated that the deflcit
is quite clear and noted that in January, 1989 she will be responsible
for the scheduling ot 14 teams.
She stated that the leagues are
comprised of boys from the ages of 13 - 18 years of age, and 250 boys
will have to be scheduled tor games.
She noted that these ages are
critical to a boy as they can get into a lot of trouble and the league
i. a way of keeping them out ot trouble.
She stated that 170 games
were scheduled and 83 games were played in Lee County, and 87 games
were played in Collier County last year.
..... Deputy Clerk Eenyon replaced Deputy Clerk Mendez at
6:10 P.M. .....
~"~r Pi.tor'. aotion to build a balltield in 8Orth aapl..
cUed for a lack of a 8eCOnd.
~_lODer Baa- aoved., that the conatruction ot a regulation
~TT.~l field and support tacl11tl.. at Golden Gate en..aoity Park be
8U thor i zed .
Mution ~onded by Co-l..ioner Goodnight with aD 888D4-
88Dt ~t Statt also be instructed to do preliminary planniug tor the
1~8~~ budget tor the possibility at a baaebell tield in the .orth
"1apl.. area.
Coaai..loner Ras.. accept~ this aaendaent.
Upon call
Page eo
-..-,--.,
....... --
\D~
I
..
"
---_..
ROVEMBER I. Igl1
tor the q1I8St1on, the 8OUon and the 88end8ent C&rrled unan.1aou.aly.
~---Mt DOt received in Clerk of the Board office.. of 11/21/88.
It:- "1'1
BID n8-1228 FOR THE '?t1RCHASE OF SYSTEMS I'tJUIT'CRE - AMARDED TO ORiCE
rt1JOIt'%'t1U &JID DESIGJr FOR STEELCASE lOOOE; AGRJŒMEJIT TO BE JfEGO'1'IATED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on
Karch 28, 1988, as evidenced by Attidavit ot Publication flIed with
the Clerk, bids were received for Bid 188-1228 tor the purchase of
.ysteas turniture until 2:30 P.M., April 13, 1988.
Brian McKenzie, As@istant to the County Manager, stated that this
itea is for the purchase at systems turniture, adding that on
September 20, 1988, the County statt presented a number of slgnificant
tindings relative to an indepth analy.i. ot product offerings.
He
noted that this analysis represented key intoraation regarding
industry wide price analysis, the relationship between product prlce
and recontiguration costs, product compatibility, tactory warranties
and service considerations.
He stated that based on the findings, the
selection co..ittee appointed to evaluate the bid otferings recom-
mended the continued procurement ot Steelcase 9000E systeas furnlture.
He indicated that atter discussions, Staff invited the bid tlnalist to
aoCk-UP their products which also included the Phoenix line which was
not previously included in the first DOck-up.
He noted that the BeC
directed statt to organize a volunteer task torce of local architects
and engineers to evaluate all the finalist bid ofterings as well as
the product otterings presented at the second mock-up.
He indicated
that the goal ot the task torce was to present an unbiased objective
recoaaendation to the BCC with regards to a systeas product selection.
Be indicated that the mock-up was held on October 21, 1988, at Golden
Gate and the task torce was present.
He indicated that on October 25,
1988, the task torce reconvened to suaaarize their tindlngs which will
be presented at this ti.e.
Me. Gina Johnson, representing W. J. Johnson & Associate., .tated
t:
t . three page letter has been prepared and presented to the BeC
Page 61
.c...................-... ..
...--..
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
indicating the findings of the task force.
She stated that the coa-
aittee telt that there were two aspects that needed to be evaluated;
the aanutacturer and their product line.
She stated that the selec-
tion ot SteelcaBe as the manufacturer W3S individually arrived at and
jointly concurred to by all committee members based on the ten reasons
that are listed in the letter.
She noted that Steelcase had two
product 11nes to otter; the 9000E and the moveable walls product.
She
stated that these product lines were discußsed and the principle dif-
ference between 9000E and the moveable walls was the lack of steel
coaponents in the aoveable walls, most notably, work station surfaces.
She .tated that in computer usaoe, static electricity can interfere
with coaaunications on data lines and in the Steelcase 9000£ there is
a split wire race track which is a valuable feature that segregates
electricity trom the computer cables.
She noted that after looking at
perforaance and the fact that the County has spent $1.2 million on
the 9000£ product already,
It was determined that there would be lost
productivity and an expense, whether in-direct or direct, in trying to
manage two product lInes in inventory and purchasing two ditterent
product lines.
She noted that the final recommendation of the task
force is that the County continue to work out a procurement system
with the existing supplier tor the existing product line that is the
County standard.
Coamissloner Saunders stated that when this item was first
discussed he telt that he needed to look at so.e ot the less expensive
product lines and asked for the additional mock-up which the
Co..ission agreed to, adding that when he evaluated some of the pro-
ducts that he saw, he telt that the moveable walls seemed to be a pro-
duct that was sturdy, durable, attractive, and would also be a savings
ot approximately $300,000.
He stated that the split wire race track
in the 900DE 15 not suffici~nt justitication to purchase the more
expensive turniture.
He stated that in terms of strength, durability,
and quality ot material, he had the i.pr~s.ion trom the representative
chat there is not much ditterence between the moveable walls and the
Page 62
,5
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
9000E furniture.
He questioned if it is assumed that these reaarks
are correct, should the County be purchasing the moveable walls
instead of the 9000£ product?
Ks. ~ohnson stated that if these reaarks are correct, then the
aoveable walls would be the best purchase, adding that she does not
believe that thege reaarks are accurate.
She noted that a work sur-
face that is steel versus a work surface that is partlcle board Is
much stronger and durable after recontigurations.
Co..issioner Hasse stated that he attended the mock-up and it is a
good idea to purchase less expensive furniture but not at the cost of
etficiency and durability.
He stated that when the furniture is
constantly aoved around and screws are going into particle boards,
they do not last that long, adding that the 9000E series is much
stronger.
M.. 30hnson stated that when durable goods are being consldered,
one has to look at the purchase price but also what it will cost and
how it wl11 tunction over the expected lite.
Ms. DarIa Shuart, representing aftice Pavilion, stated that she
turned in a bid on this project for Encore, Action office, and Phoenix
which i. repres~nted by her manufacturer, Herman Miller.
She noted
that the criteria was product, price and servic~ and she met all the
crlteria.
There were various discussions regarding the bid specitica-
tion documents and the items that were listed as options.
She noted
that In preparing her bid specitications, she listed these item. as
options and in doing so, it seemed to create confusion, but she
que.tions the review and the subsequent adjustment to the specitica-
tions.
She noted that the Steelcase specifications do not meet the
list prices as they are indicated in the manufacturer's publlshed list
price book, adding that this means that these prices are artiflcially
low.
She noted that she does not understand their prlcing.
Purchasing Director Carnell stated that the blds were received on
April 22, 1988, and the price list comes from the manufacturers to
'eir dealers, adding that it the pricing has changed since that time,
Pege153
,Os
._.. .....-.> ..........>'.""."""
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
1t ls irrelevant because the evaluation was done based on the price
at the time the bid was received and opened.
He stated that a date
and time has to be established that will hold for each bidder.
He
noted that each bidder was asked what the maximum annual increase tor
the contract would be and Steelcase indicated that there would be no
increase. over the prices bid on April 22, 1988 and it i8 the County's
Intent to hold them to that figure.
Co..issioner Hasse stated that the co..ittee was formed to eva-
luate all the bid. and there should not be any question. reaaining at
this point regarding bid specitication8.
He stated that he respects
the oplnions ot the co..ittee that was formed of volunteers to eva-
luate these bids.
Ms. Shuart stated that the evaluation criteria has been
establl.hed and met, and she assures the BeC that her product wl11
stand up in the County environment.
She stated that she 1. requesting
that a decision not be made at this time.
Ms. Diane Collins, representative of Phoenix Designs, stated that
the objectlve ot this bid is to aaintain the County's current standard
of office furniture systems and approve negotiations.
She indicated
that slnce Phoenix is the low bidder and meets the needs of the County
at a price that is attordable, she would suggest that this bid be
awarded to Phoenix.
She stated that she has concerns that the execu-
tive suaaary has many irregularities with mlsleading statements that
are substitive with regards to pricing and performance, and would
request that this matter be reviewed before any df!cision is made.
Hr. Lee Nygaard, Di~trict Manager tor Steelcase, stated that he
did not make the statement that ~oveable walls are anything other than
an equal alternative to the other products of the 9000, addlng that it
would be a very appropriate comparison.
He stated that he did say
that aoveable walls are equal to the products that were being
discussed as budget products.
He indicated that moveable walls is
their brand name tor their syste.s product and there is also the
Jries 9000 products which have been used by the County for the last
Page a4
I""
\í) \..
-.w.c.........-....
NOVEMnRR 8, 19RR
three years.
He indicated that he has not submitted any prlcing other
than the original pricing and there have been no revisions made to it.
He noted that this pricing is being held for the entlre term that is
being requested.
Be noted that the series 9000 product can be recon-
figured more and longer, as well as having a better life for the
County, than 608e of the other products.
He noted that Steelcase is
the largest manutacturer in the world and there is over $10 billion in
assets.
Co..issloner Saunders questioned if the moveable walls serve the
County's needs, to which Mr. Nygaard stated that he does not believe
that it will serv~ the needs ot the County as well as the Series 9000
because the product that the County uses has been proven that it was
the right choice and it continues to show the durability, the free
.tanding option, and the recontiguration.
Coaaissioner Saunders questioned if there are any other product
11nes that are less expensive than the 9000£ that would serve the
needs ot the County, to which Mr. Nygaard indicated that the Staff
evaluated that option and the report indicated that there are products
that are less expensive but will not hold up as well as or serve the
needs ot the County as well.
ec-i..icmer Goodnight 8OV~, ..eonded by Co8ai..icmer B.... that
Bid '..-1228 be a.arded to Ottice Furniture and Design for the
pa.rcha8e of Steele... 9000& and to negotiate an agT888ent.
Coaaissioner Saunders stated that he does not understand the
urgency on this matter and would ask that the BCC deter action on this
item until another approach could be developed in selecting this fur-
n1ture and reviewing other product lines.
CO..i8sioner Has8e stated that he i8 willing to honor the request
of Co..lssloner Saunders, but h~ Is not sure that anything will be
acco8plished.
CO..is8ioner Goodnight indicated that a task force of volunteer.
. asked to evaluate these bids and the furniture which has been done
and they have made their recommendation, adding that she does not teel
Page 65
, ,
...".-..",.. -.. ---...
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
that this aatter should be postponed any longer.
Hs. Johnson stated that she believes that the bids were put out on
a level tield, there was not any manipulation atter or before the tact
nor were there any preconceIved notions, adding that the blds were
evaluated fairly, there were two mock-ups held and enough staff time
and aoDey has ~en spent on this matter and she would reco..end that a
deci.ion be aade either for or against the reco..endation at the task
force.
She stated that there has been sutficient data presented to
the sec to help make a decision.
Co8a1_1oner Baa8e 'Wi thdr.,., hi. second, to the IIOtion, and
C~t-l0D8r Pi.tor then 88Conded the IIOtion.
0p0A c:all tor the quatltion, the IIOtion carried 3/2, (Co8ai..ioner.
~1:'8 aDd Ba8- opposed).
~---Dt DOt receiv~ in Clerk of the Board office.. of 11/21/88.
It- 'lOA
A.CCEP"r.A8C& or DUD FOR LELY BARJ:rOOT BEACH PARXIKG LOT; I.GRESS/EGRESS
E.UJIAUIX PJtDVIDI.O ACCESS TO 'nΠPARXI.G LOT FROM LELY BEACH BLVD.;
UD DUD FOR 15 1'00'%' BOYFER AREA - APPROVED AJID RESOLUTIOK 88-28"
CAJJCELLI.a TAXES O. THIS PROPERTY - ADOPTED
County Attorney Cuyler stated that he has been waiting for quite
.ome time for this matter to be completed and in the agenda packet Is
the deed tor the parking lot and the ingress/egress easement document
and the deed for the 15 foot buffer area.
,...-t-ioner Pi.tor lIO'Ved, 88CODCSed by Co8ai..ion.er Goodnight and.
carried 1m&Dl.aou.aly, that the warranty deed tor the parking lot, the
J.Dg:res8/egre88 e-....ant provldlng acc... to the parking froa Lely
8e8c.b 81vd. and. the deed tor the 15 toot bv.tter area be approved.
County Manager Dorrill stated that there was a requirement that
the north side ot the parking lot be landscaped, but atter dlscusslon,
it was decided against because Lee County is in the process of four-
laning Bonita Beach Road; theretore, the landscaping would be useless.
ec-i_iooer Pi.tor lIO'Ved, 88Conded. by Co8ai..loner Goodnight aDd
carried unani.aou.aly, that ReeolutloD 88-284 cancelling the taxes .. of
tl:ú8 date, on this property, be adopted.
Page 66
'.: (ì
. ,/
-""." ....»-.,..,-
--",.
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. .11.Al6:2
BUtlGZT AÞIU~IS 89-20/24 - ADOP'nD
Co8al..ionar Pi.tor aoved, seconded by Coaaissioner 8&8.e and
carri~ unaniaouøly, that Budget Amendments 89-20/24 be adcpt~.
It.. .11A.3
~ »LP~ RESOLOTIOK 89-2 - ADOP'nD
Co8als.ionar Goodnight aoved, seconded by Co..is.ioner Pi.tor and
carried unaniaoualy, that Budget Amendment Resolutlon 89-2 be adopted.
Page 61
--'-"""""".."'..""-"."'"
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
..... Coaai..ioner Pi.tor aoved, .econded by Co..i..ioner Baa..
and carried unaniaoualy, that the tollowlng lte.. under
the Consent Agenda be approved and/or adopted: .....
Ite. 'UBI
BUDGET AÞŒJI'DKE)(T TRAJlSnRRIKG l'OJrDS FROM l'OJrD 301 RESERVES TO THE
MATER/SEWER KAS'l'ER PLAJr FOR GOVERJÐŒJrr COMPLEX TO COMPLETE PLAJr IX
r¡$CAL YEAR li18-89 IØ THE AMOOKT or 815,000
It.. 'UB2
COKTftACT MaTH j~INS & CHARLAKD FOR THRESHOLD IØSPECTIOØ SERVICES rOR
THE DALTH AJrD PUBLIC SERVICES BUILDIØG AS A THREE STORY STRUCTtJRE IX
All A.MOtTrr .err TO EXCEED 813,000 AJrD THEY SHALL PROVIDE $300,000
PftOrESSIOXAL LIABILITY IØSURAØCE
Document not received in Clerk ot the Board oftlce a. of 11/21/88.
It.. '1483 8OV~ to Ite. '9B2
It.. 'UB4
BID '88-1322 AWARDED TO LABGFORD FORD IX THE AMOUWT OF $i,3Gl rOR A
n89 4-DOOR .1EEP CHEROnE WITH "LAREDO" PACOGE
L~çal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
October 13, 1988, as evidenced by Atfidavit of Publication flIed with
the Clerk, bids were received for Bid '88-1322 tor a Jeep Cherokee
until 2:30 P.H., October 26, 1988.
It.. '14Bð
rACILITIES MAJlAGDŒJIT DEPARTMEJrr TO PREPARE A "lfEEDS ASSESSMEJrl'" IX
CO..roJrCTIO. WITH A KASTER PLAJI rOR THE PROPOSED GOVEJUIMD'TAL
FACILITIES TO BE LOCAT~Q-9llTH~ ~.5 ACRE SITE IØ PELICAlI BAY
It.. 'UB6
PI.AI. PLAT or ROSDŒADE AT WYJrDDŒRE - APPROVED WITH STIPt7LATIOØS
1.
The Final Plat not be recorded until the required i.prove-
mente have been constructed and accepted or until approved
security is received tor the unco~pleted improvements and
that all construction shall be completed within 36 months
ot the date ot this approval.
It.. '1487
ADDITIO.AL SECTIOØS OP SABAL PALM ROAD FOR COOWTY MAINTEXAlICE -
ACCEPTED SUBjECT TO COKFORMAJfCE WITH CURREXT COOWTY REQUIREMEXTS AJß)
IPICI~Io_~D'p"ITIOKAL" R..JGffT-OJ'-~A'\t'.!<~P. _EKVIR..QJ9'!.IPfJ'.A.~ CONDITIOØS
See Page
?J...A../
It.. 'UB8
BODGET AMKJfDMElfI'S TRAJlSnRRIøG rtTJfDS WITHIX l'OJrD 301 FROM CAPITAL
~PRIATIOØS IKTO OPERATIKG APPROPRIATIOØS
r... '14Bi
I ~ CO.STRUCTIOØ IMPROVEMENTS BY COOWTY PERSOKKEL AT TWO LOCATIOXS:
JrOR'l'1I ROAD AT AIRPORT ROAD AJrD R~ ROAD AT C.R. 846 SUB.7ECT TO
SPECIAL COJrDITIOKS WITH ALL IMPROVEMEKT COSTS SUBSIDIZED BY OTHERS
Page 68
~
j,
I'"¡?
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
It.. .14810
RAXXI.Ø ~ SBOK'%' LIST or THE SELECTIOW COMMITTEE FOR THE SOLID WASTE
TECBXICAL AXD ECOKOMIC COMPUTER MODEL; STAr? TO ØEGOTIATE A COwrKACT
WIn 1'D rIM or BAZD AJt1) SAWYER
It.. 'UDI
L.U'I:JMAJt% mAns, PHASE I-A, MATER A.JrD SEMU FACILITIES ACCEPTAJrCZ
See OR Boolr/.J.stf""'. Paaes .::t.l~~~
It.. 'UD2
LAJrIJKUX ESTATES, PHASE II-C, MATEP. A.JrD SJnfP rACILITIES ACCEP'l'AJlCZ
See OR Book I~ Paaes;<.a¥?~J
It.. .UD3
LOXK OAX, PHASE III - SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE
See OR BOOK 1393, Pðqes 1358/1382
It.. .14D4
LOU OU pOD - ACIR.IEKDT FOR PHASE III
See OR Book 1393, Paaes 1353/1351
It.. .1~El
rAITKrOL PERrORMAXCE BaKD OF MICHAEL J. VOLPE FOR DISTRICT.2
CQMMISSIOJID
See Pages ~ ~
It.. .14&2
KESOLUTI08 88-280 ESTABLISHIKG KEW PAY PLAW TITLES AJt1) RECLASSI~ØO
TWO POSnIOøS
See Pages '7/.. (!./..C,øA
It.. 'UBI
SATISFACTIOK OF LIENS FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFEWDER
See Pages ~~ 7
It.. '14B
MISCILLAXEpOUS CORRESPOKDEKCE - FILED AJt1)/OR REFERRED
There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following
81.cellaneous correspondence be tiled and/or referred to the varIous
departments as indicated below:
1 .
t...t t...r dat..d ')j:'lo/nn from J,.rry [,. YltlJgh,," , Inr.pector General
by Virgil Choates, Correction Otficer Inspector II, Dept. or
Corrections, to Bce ChairQan r~ Inspection Report dated
9/29/88. xc: Neil Dorrill; FlIed.
2.
Memo dated 10/17/88 to Interested Parties from Dale
Twachtmann, Secretary, DER, re second series of Publlc
Page 69
,:) ;::¡
..-..." ."~.... _.,.'"-"...
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
Workshops on the Study ot the State's Surtace Water Quallty
Classitication System. xc: Tom Olliff; Bill Lorenz; and
Filed.
3.
Letter dated 10/21/88 to BCC trom Trudie Bell, Environmental
Specialist, DER, Wetland Resource Management with standard
tor. application (File No. 111558019 75 & Alligator Alley
Dev., Inc.) which involves dredge and fill activities In water
ot the State within the limits of your jurisdiction. xc:
George Archibald; Tom Olliff; Neil Dorrill; and Filed.
4.
Letter dated 10/24/88 from Robert K. Lotlin, Environmental
Specialist, DER, to BCC Chairman re Hubschman & Assoc., File
11111561545. ~c: Neil Dorril1; George Archibald; Tom Olliff;
and Filed.
5.
Letter dated 10/10/88 fro;j'.Robert K. Loflin, Environmental
Specialist, DER, to BCC Chairman re File No. 111556805, which
involv..,. drp.(]IJ" ;ltl(] f I) 1 ,¡rt Ivlt I"n ¡n w.~I,.r,. of th,. :1l..t..
within th~ Ilmlt8 of your jurisdiction. xc: Neil Dorrill;
Bill Lorenz; George Archibald; and Filed.
6.
Letter dated 10/26/88 trom Ron Walters, Environmental
Special1Et, PER, to BCC ChftlrMan, r" Florida Power' Light
Co., File No. 111563915. KC: Nell Dorrl1l; Blll Lorenz;
George Archibald; and Filed.
7.
Letter dated 10/21/88 to W. Douglas Hall, Esquire, Carlton,
Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smi~h and Cutler. P.A., Tallahassee
with Carbon copy to BCC trom Altred B. Devereaux, Jr., Chlef
Bureau ot Coastal Engineering and Regulation, DNR, re permit
violation: IDBS 86-145 CO. xc: Neil Dorrill; Tom Olliff;
and F lled.
8.
Letter dated 10/27/88 to W. Dexter Bender and Associates fro.
Alfred B. Devereaux, Jr., Chief, Bureau ot Coastal Engineering
and Regulation, DNR, r. permit violation: ICO-176. xc: Neil
Dorrill; Tom Olliff; Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
9.
Letter dated 10/24/88 to 5CC trom Tony D. McNeal, Engineer,
Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, DNR, re Pile:
CO-188. xc: Tom Olliff; Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
10.
Minutes received and tiled:
a.
b.
CCPC Agenda tor 11/3/88 and Minutes of 10/14/88.
Collier County Ad Hoc Committee for the Home!ess Minutes
tor 10/5/88. .
Naples City Council Agenda tor 11/02/88.
c.
11.
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual dated 10/31/88 from Sheriff's Department.
xc: Lori Zalka; Filed.
12.
Letter dated 10/27/88 to BCC trom James T. Show, P.E.,
Director, Surtace Water Management Division, South Florida
Water Management District, re Notice of Int...nt to Construct
Works, Project: Vanderbilt Beach Road. xc: Neil Dorrill;
George Archibald; John Boldt; and Filed.
Page 70
,-;1' 1
'oj
-.........---.-..--...,.
-----
...
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
There being no turther business tor the Good of the County, the
8eeting was adjourned by Order ot the Chair - Time:
..~~Ii.~'r:í.
,t <J.
. .
A TTZS.T ~ ';'"
JANB$ C. GILES, C~K
... - I
. r.
- ...'. . ...
.~'...' """V
4~~Á. ': '.~?'~-c;~, ø (!.
~, 'pt
These minutes approved by the
6:10 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
CHAIRMAN
as presented
or as corrected
Board on ~~_h-/.~ /11')'
L.-
Page 71
'" .-..-.--....