Agenda 06/24/2014 Item #16A196/24/2014 16.A.19.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a Work Order with Humiston and Moore Engineers to provide
professional engineering services as needed by the Marco Island Central Beach Re -grade project
under Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ for a Time and Material amount not to exceed $169,724; authorize
the County Manager or his designee to execute the Work Order, approve necessary budget
amendment, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism, Project No. 90062.
OBJECTIVE: Secure professional engineering services as required to execute the Marco Island
central beach re- grading project.
CONSIDERATIONS: The central beach of Marco Island located just south of Sand Dollar
Island and continuing south to the Marriott Hotel between DEP reference monuments R -135 to
R -142 is excessively wide and flat. The beach in this area is between 500 and 1,200 feet wide
with little to no surface slope to the Gulf. This region has a tendency to pond during heavy rains
creating a situation conducive to algae growth and excessive surface hardening after drying.
These two conditions have greatly reduced the use of this beach for suitable sea turtle nesting
habitat. In addition, the recreational use of this public beach is also greatly reduced due to public
health concerns resulting from the residual /unsightly algae growth.
This project would provide professional engineering services as necessary to conduct
preliminary design and modeling, state and federal pennitting, plans and technical specifications,
bidding services and construction phase inspection as needed to execute this project. Positive
drainage would be created by building a wider transitional berm seaward of the upland dune with
a seaward slope to Mean High Water. The sand to build this improved profile will be dredged
from the nearshore region along the seaward portion of the upland beach profile down to
approximately Mean Lower Low Water. The end result will be a slightly narrower dry beach
width. The extent of the dredging, grading and berm width will diminish from north to south.
The beach width will be reduced by approximately 230 feet at the north end of the project to 50
feet at the south end of the project. This reduced beach width will provide the public decreased
travel distance from the condominiums and Tigertail Beach parking areas.
A conceptual design report and scope of work proposal for this project are attached.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is available through Tourist Development Tax, Fund 195. A
budget amendment will be necessary to move funds, in the amount of $169,724 from reserves
into Project 90062, Marco Island Central Beach Re- Grade. Funding for this permit will not be
requested for reimbursement from any grantor agency. Construction costs are estimated at
$1,000,000. A most probable cost estimate will be developed to confirm project costing during
the design.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the growth management impact
related to this action.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: At the April 10 and May 8, 2014 CAC
meeting, this item was unanimously approved by an 8 to 0 vote.
Packet Page -810-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
This item will be reviewed for approval at the Tourist Development Council meeting on June 23,
2014. Staff will advise the Board of County Commissioner (BCC) of the TDC recommendations
prior to the June 24, 2014 BCC meeting.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and
requires majority vote for approval. — CMG
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves a Work Order
with Humiston and Moore Engineers to provide professional engineering services as needed by
the Marco Island Central Beach Re -grade project under Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ for a Time and
Material amount not to exceed of $169,724; authorize the County Manager or his designee to
execute the work order, approve necessary budget amendment, and make a finding that this item
promotes tourism, Project No. 90062
Prepared by: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Natural Resources Department
Attachment:
1. Conceptual Design Report
2. Humiston and Moore Proposal
3. Work Order
Packet Page -811-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.16.A.16.A.19.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve a Work Order with Humiston and Moore
Engineers to provide professional engineering services as needed by the Marco Island Central
Beach Re -grade project under Contract No. 13- 6164 -CZ for a Time and Material amount not to
exceed $169,724; authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the Work Order,
approve necessary budget amendment, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism,
Project No. 90062.
Meeting Date: 6/24/2014
Prepared By
Name: HambrightGail
Title: Accountant, Coastal Zone Management
5/30/2014 3:30:29 PM
Submitted by
Title: Accountant, Coastal Zone Management
Name: HambrightGail
513012014 3:30:30 PM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development & Environmental Services
Date: 6/3/2014 4:16:19 PM
Name: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services, Natural Resources
Date: 6/3/2014 5:24:12 PM
Name: McAlpinGary
Title: Manager - Coastal Management Programs, Coastal Zone Management
Date: 6/4/2014 11:42:49 AM
Packet Page -812-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
Name: NorthnupAdam
Title: Procurement Specialist, Purchasing & General Services
Date: 6/9/2014 9:57:07 AM
Name: KearnsAllison
Title: Manager Financial & Operational Support, Transportation Administration
Date: 6/9/2014 10:19:35 AM
Name: Tara Castillo
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Road Maintenance
Date: 6/9/2014 10:19:47 AM
Name: MarkiewiczJoanne
Title: Director - Purchasing /General Services, Purchasing & General Services
Date: 6/9/2014 11:02:43 AM
Name: WardKelsey
Title: Manager - Procurement, Purchasing & General Services
Date: 6/12/2014 12:01:07 PM
Name: OberrathKaren
Title: Accountant, Senior, Grants Management Office
Date: 6/12/2014 2:31:24 PM
Name: GreeneColleen
Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO General Services
Date: 6/12/2014 3:58:50 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning
Date: 6/13/2014 9:54:25 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/13/2014 10:22:23 AM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mngmt Svs, Office of Management & Budget
Date: 6/16/2014 9:32:52 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 6/16/2014 2:06:18 PM
Packet Page -813-
Collier County
Marco Island Central Beach Re -grade
Prepared for:
Collier County
Growth Management Division
Coastal Zone Management
2800 Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Prepared By
Humiston & Moore Engineers
April 2014
HUMISTQN & MCOORE ENGINEERS
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING
"Restoring teaches as Nattoal Coastal. ; stcros"
Packet Page -814-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
� 4
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
Introduction:
This report has been prepared in accordance with Collier County Purchase Order
#45- 149739 under Contract No. 09- 5262 -S2 and County Project No. 195 - 80166.
Problem:
The central beach of Marco Island located south of the connection of Sand Dollar Island to
the mainland just south of Tigertail Beach is excessively wide. While this condition may
be highly desired along many coastal areas, the wide flat beach in this area is between
500 and 1200 feet wide. This region has a tendency to pond during heavy rains and
overwash conditions creating a situation conducive to algae growth resulting in a hard -
panned area reducing the sustainability of the region as suitable sea turtle habitat. In
addition, following the drying of ponding water, the recreational use of this area becomes
diminished, and residual unsightly algae growth creates a potential health concern. Laser
grading of the beach has been conducted in the past resulting in minimal change and the
beach slope flattened as evidenced in the survey provided in the attached plans.
Approach:
The scope of this study includes the development of a conceptual plan for an updated
beach profile design for the section of beach between the approximate locations of DEP
reference monuments R -135 and R -142. The updated beach profile design creates a
wider transitional berm area seaward of the upland vegetated dune region with a seaward
slope to Mean High Water. The sand for the transitional berm area will be dredged from
the nearshore region along the seaward portion of the upland beach profile down to
approximately Mean Lower Low Water. Below is a table summarizing the change in the
dry beach and vegetation at each reference monument. This includes the proposed dry
beach width, loss of dry beach as a consequence of the re- grading, the approximate
associated volume of sand to be moved in the vicinity of each monument, and the
proposed slope at the MHWL. Also shown in the table is the proposed width of the new
vegetation and the associated gain in width of the dune vegetation.
MONUMENT
ID
MARCO ISLAND RE -GRADE EXISTING VS PROPOSED CONDITIONS
PROPOSED LOSS OF CUT FILL PROPOSED PROPOSED
BEACH WIDTH DRYBEACH VOLUME VOLUME SLOPE VEG WIDTH
(FT) (F7) (C)9 (Cr AT MHW (F7)
GAIN IN
VEG WIDTH
(F7)
R -136
1042
-231
- 16,173.6
16, 011.3
1 V.• 120H
200
156
R -136.5
666
-193
-20,702.8
18, 560.3
IV.-90H
100
46
R -137
526
-169
-16,575,9
14, 878.1
IV.-80H
100
53
R -137.5
469
-140
- 14,224.0
11,678.6
IV.-70H
100
51
T -138
467
-95
- 12,007.6
11,759.8
1V.-70H
100
55
R -139
547
-63
- 10,482.2
13,920.9
1V.60H
100
100
R -140
333
-32
-5,977.0
9,590.3
IV.-60H
78
8
R -140.5
230
-73
-8,656.3
6,650.0
IV.-40H
78
78
R -141
440
-63
-6,567.5
6,914.2
1 V :40H
50
50
R -141.5
423
-38
-4,817.8
3,996.6
1 V:40H
50
50
R -142
446
-4
-1,424.0
2,510.4
1 V.-40H
50
50
TOTAL:
- 117,608.7
116,470.6
Page 1 of 4
_�t.. ..�
Packet Page -815-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
The end result will be a slightly narrower dry beach width at the completion of the grading.
The extent of the dredging, grading and berm width will diminish from north to south. The
beach width will be reduced by approximately 230 feet at the north end of the project to 50
feet at the south end of the project. This will provide residents and the public decreased
travel distance from the building(s) and parking area(s), particularly along Tigertail Beach.
The landward portion of the transitional berm will be planted with sea oats for stabilization
and will remain relatively low to avoid disruption of views of the beach and water from the
upland. These plantings, along with pathways and walkovers, have traditionally provided
enhanced dune stabilization throughout the state, most recently noted during hurricane
Sandy, and increased the size of the habitat for land dwelling species. The plantings
shown on the attached plans for Residents Beach, Marco Marriot, and Madeira
Condominium are shown in draft form only as the details will need to be coordinated with
the prospective entities.
State Agency Review:
The conceptual approach to this problem was discussed with Dr. Robbin Trindell,
Biological Administrator III, with the Imperiled Species Management Section of the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Dr. Trindell was supportive of the
concept and approach for the improved sustainability of sea turtle nesting habitat. She will
want to be involved early in the permitting process to review specifics of the design and
provide input.
The design concept was also discussed with Robert Brantly, P.E., Program Administrator
of the Engineering, Hydrology & Geology Program at the state Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP). Mr. Brantly was also in support of the approach and
confirmed that the permitting process would be through the Joint Coastal Permitting
Program which coordinates directly with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the federal
resource agencies of Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Conceptual Plan:
Updated beach profile surveys were completed in March 2014 by Dagostino & Wood, Inc.,
a local surveying firm. H &M used this profile data to develop the preliminary conceptual
design with input from county and City of Marco staff. The dredging (excavation) amounts
to a total of approximately 120,000 cy. It is estimated that the construction, grading, and
vegetation planting can be carried out under a budget of $1 M.
Impacts:
The positive results of the project will be improved sea turtle nesting habitat as well as
increased dune vegetation habitat for local land dwelling species. An increased slope in
the beach will allow for drainage thus reducing the amount of algae growth, and improve
the storm protection from high frequency events and overwash.
Removal of sand from the immediate nearshore area will be expected to have some
localized effect on the adjacent shorelines. The extent of the adjustment of the adjacent
beach areas will be a function of the amount of dredging involved. This is an area which
should be modeled to project the shoreline response as part of the design. Considerably
Page 2 of 4
Packet Page -816-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
less shoreline response would be expected at the south end of the project due to the
lower amount of excavation at the south end.
Lastly, there will be an aesthetics issue relative to the additional planting of vegetation on
the transitional berm. While the vegetation provides improved stability and storm
protection for the dune system, some may be concerned with the potential for impacts to
line of sight to the beach and water. The limited height of the transitional berm area in
conjunction with the limited planting of dune grasses toward the landward portion of the
berm is anticipated to address this issue. These types of issues should be addressed and
resolved locally before applications are filed with the state and federal agencies.
Summary:
The proposed conceptual plan represents a project which will help address the on -going
problem experienced along the central beach area on Marco Island. Preliminary
discussions with DEP indicate the project is "doable ", providing the project has local
support. Initial estimates place a budget of $1 M to carry out the design.
Preliminary Conceptual Plans are attached for reference.
Page 3 of 4
Packet Page -817-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
View of dune vegetation looking southeast from Monument R -137.
View of beach looking southeast from Monument R -136.
J. ... ...
Packet Page -818-
Page 4 of 4
Cr
�
�
�
�
�4
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�NW--�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
■��
�
���
\2222
\\
� \
�
§�2|tx
,
�
�
kg_:u
Packet Page -819-
6/24/2014 16.A. 19.
.
\m \ \�
7i Wx
uo
\\® I
k(
}«\ I
zu
uo
\ )�
Qf
z
L.
*§ 4 «
(k� )\( \
" z R
cL ƒ \ y
2 :w� Ed2�
■��
���
� \
�
Packet Page -819-
6/24/2014 16.A. 19.
.
\m \ \�
7i Wx
uo
\\® I
k(
}«\ I
zu
uo
\ )�
Qf
z
L.
*§ 4 «
(k� )\( \
" z R
cL ƒ \ y
2 :w� Ed2�
kg_:u
Packet Page -819-
6/24/2014 16.A. 19.
.
\m \ \�
7i Wx
uo
\\® I
k(
}«\ I
zu
uo
\ )�
Qf
z
L.
*§ 4 «
(k� )\( \
" z R
cL ƒ \ y
2 :w� Ed2�
2
v>
cl-
o-
3
o
al
zl
al
of
I
I
I
M
W�
J
z°
U
W
m
3
2
� pl
o Q
N Z
�I
d
o
I
I
I
e I
I
I
I
I
°o
v
I
I
F= I
.W.. I
O
� O
Z N
� I
� I
o I
i I
o h I
M
W � I
� I
U O
Z a 0
Q
a
� I
Z
w I
ao
I
I
o
o I
I
I
I
O
N I
O
N
°o
O
O
b
0
O
� o
Z
2
O
i
W o
o p
� o
a
w
N
V o
Z o
Q �
F3
o
b
°v
O
N
O � IA O h O � N N
O
O .11 O h O h p O h O h
OAVN '13 GAYN '1-4 "A313
M
O
U
W
m
3
2
I
O
al
21
vl
of
I
I
i
CAVN 'lj "A313
Packet Page -822-
O
N
°o
O
b
°v
w
� O
� O
Z N
w
i
Z
O
o p
p o
w
Ln
U O
Z o
tna �
tn
e
0
0
O
N
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
3
2
O
al
2
>I
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
O
CL
v
W
m
a
0
N
A
U
M �
O U O
N O Q
O
moo
p'z3
o=i
Quo
u
Q
jV0
ZQ�
O m
U
m0cr
C
QUA
UwZ
ZOO
a°iOw
o = �
h �
OZ�
X04
W W
w oCL
w wzwm
� o
Z Z�N�
O
�° E
o
o °
C ONQ
uj
�oNaE
t/) OMinmo
n"E
Z O Htr�`.I:ii
� � z
ndi�03
N2443
0
0
o N
e I I
� � W
Z OU vQi vw=i
a
U
O O U 00 w O
N NpU V
rTTf —T
O n O h O h O N
1 I 1 N N
CAM '13 "A313
Jy`
:xz _
y�
2
`y
v>
o-
3
x
Q
al
Z
�I
o�
IO
Q
Iz
I^
M
O> N
+ +
II
I n4I
/1
2
0
CO
I
0
a
x
U
W
m
U
1 � �
2 a
O > >C J W
az
h O h O In O h O h O N O h O h
N N
I I 1 I 1 I 1 I N N
QAVN '13 "A313 QAVN '13 ''A313
O [
z:
h [
M
WI
V
0
4
x
U
W
m
L
to
IZ
I
13
I�
I�
I�
II
I
III
JZ "- Y w
��t 0_ V,
O
N
0
Co
0
b
O
W
~ N
z
Z
0
O p
O �
W
U 00
0
0
b
O
O
� o
O h O N O Ul O [n
I I N N
QAVN '13 "A313
Packet Page -823-
D[
z;
� C
h
M_
W1
V
0
a
2
U
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
C
.,lm
� w
O > >
o� Z
L W 3�
0
N
O�
•' v
M �
O
O Z �
N O Q
0
moo
p�3
z
p OZ2
� N O
U
UQ
O
pub
U
Z..,�
UWZ
Z p O
O 2QIwi1
C)
xo�
0
Q
[,2j �2Wm
� o
Z
0
0
Q O o0
� NNo
a % 4,E
n OM�m0
W
M E
axo
LO �oQaxs
z�.ds
0
0 3
o p
b � �
W J F
O
W � �
�y
QO
M, U
Z= V)
yW Z J:
-mO�c
o u o u o v o v
QAVN 'lj "A313 a,
wbCz',`
3
�
O
0
O
O
O
N
Z
N
d
�
I
O
0o
I
I
o0
b
I
b
I
I
�
I
Iz
°a
O
> O>
N
z
�-
z
I
-.
W
++
+ +
�
I �
W
W
o
o
O
h
O
Q
w)
O
cz
3
a
1
l0 3
rn a
>
h
[n
W
WW
W
Q
o
o
a
o
U
b
b
O
�
W
O
�
O
w
O
Z
h a ?
h O h O In O h O h O N O h O h
N N
I I 1 I 1 I 1 I N N
QAVN '13 "A313 QAVN '13 ''A313
O [
z:
h [
M
WI
V
0
4
x
U
W
m
L
to
IZ
I
13
I�
I�
I�
II
I
III
JZ "- Y w
��t 0_ V,
O
N
0
Co
0
b
O
W
~ N
z
Z
0
O p
O �
W
U 00
0
0
b
O
O
� o
O h O N O Ul O [n
I I N N
QAVN '13 "A313
Packet Page -823-
D[
z;
� C
h
M_
W1
V
0
a
2
U
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
C
.,lm
� w
O > >
o� Z
L W 3�
0
N
O�
•' v
M �
O
O Z �
N O Q
0
moo
p�3
z
p OZ2
� N O
U
UQ
O
pub
U
Z..,�
UWZ
Z p O
O 2QIwi1
C)
xo�
0
Q
[,2j �2Wm
� o
Z
0
0
Q O o0
� NNo
a % 4,E
n OM�m0
W
M E
axo
LO �oQaxs
z�.ds
0
0 3
o p
b � �
W J F
O
W � �
�y
QO
M, U
Z= V)
yW Z J:
-mO�c
o u o u o v o v
QAVN 'lj "A313 a,
wbCz',`
2
v>
O-
I O
>
Iz
I �
M
z Q I �-
2
++ I�
+ I
Co
i
II
M
II
z
O
a n
W
W > �
o> 2 3
°3 ti YW
W iJ
00 pl
O >
N Z
VI
OI
I
o
I
I
I
I
O I
I
I
I
O
a I
I°
IQ
� Z
I�
O M
O
N
N R >
W
0 0o 3
� J
++
CCW °o II
o I
W i
V) � I
U O
2 �
a
O
m Q
O
W
O �
0 3 0
v �
2
W k
IW
N
O
N
O
b
O
w
y- O
Z ^
2
W O
o °
p °
Q'
3
w
In
U 00
Z �
p
0
a
I O
IF N
O 7-7
O N O h O
h O h N N O N O h h
I I I I I I 1 I N N
GAVN 'lj "A373 CAM '13 " "373
io
Iz
app M
�+ +
a
U
Q I
m I
z
o W
b >
> p
ro h
^Z w w
O
N
LO
LM
°o
O
b
O
W
� O
� O
2
Z
o °
3
W
U o
Z �
ti
O �
I �
°v
f HEN, N
I O
O h O h O h O Y
I I I N N
CAM '13 "A373
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
I p^
I'
In I Qz
M
ex z2
�oo 3
O Uj J
++
II
V � I
W I
G1 I
I
I
x c�
o w
n; MJ
W WW
z
Packet Page -824 •-
r
0
N
O�
. x
M Q
O Z W
N p Q
Q °
O
m00
p�3
p Z4v
0
Z °
WOE
Z
O 02m
U
b m0>
W �
QUA
UWZ
ZOO
O � W
d �2m
O °4
Q O
O OmU
ti
� o
Z Z.. Nei
Q
o p
� NNo
4,E
C11
W o`ra�c
2 o v�vi�Wz
ro �
� nakoa
(n biQ23
O NZ�43
° 3
° o
b 2 b
v°
N
O
Z U
O N O h O h O h
�� z
I N N
I I I I � Xr, �
L a
OAVN 'ld "373 „✓, � Z
3
x
Q
>I
2�
v
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I>
Iz
n
� p ❑ M
Q Q I
4 ++ s
II
v II
W li
m I
I
o W
Q >
> O
Z
x
N
W W
O �
O
O
N i
c
°o
m
O
b
O
� o
W N
z
0
W O
O
Q
LU
N
y �
❑
v
o m
b
I°
Z
n
IN
I�
3
I�
I�
I�
I
o O
> j
o
W U-
y
O W
N O
O
N
°o
b
b
.WJ
O
� o
W N
Z
z
0
W O
O p
3
W
U po
N
0
b
o
O
IF O
U - >
W
N3 w
W Z
2 J_,
0 0
O h O N O h O h O u) O h O h O h
QAVN '13 "A313 CAM "13 "A313
N
�-p p
>
Z z
�n in
0++
RE I I
I m I
I °>
12
I I.
M
IN
�3
J
III
Ili
O
N
0
m
O
b
°Q
N
O
0
0
�o
�o
°b
} W Q
J >
W 2
h
W
O
W N
�3
-flz
0
N N
I N
I I I I
OAVN "13 "A313
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
� mmrmmmMON�jo� vva
JU
' cU ao V r r ci Oi Ifi i0 t7 (J b
0 r rn to r
> i�mpp uppY��n pNpm mm
may- c'iNNN Oim V I- I
W J U
J
0-1
m m to O m N O m u7 m OIL
M tV 1n V r (V f`• t0 n r Q m
nUn ovmm)nmvm
Ems' cdo�tidrto uiro�vr�
F
O-� �Wp OI NOD, n O r N�mm ••
UOW trl MNN �eQ-m r�mm V
~ T J
O
!= o m N b M n b m n n a~
LL vmm.n
LL
W
lu i N Q m Q h m
W¢ v vi of vi of v v o ui
a
O
v�0000000�ri �no00000o 000
�WOOOOO00000
W nhv)u)b u)Q Qinh�p tGbb b
J ¢ I
0
2 U b m •- m n Q Q m m Q W N b
v V (hppc�p: O (Q�Qm p^p t� mWV�W,p ava��i 'O
U� W OIb N�� � V m�'m)NN�OOOOi
Sp
Z
Z
n �p of Vi •O ron. f. pp O� ON �N
LMx r� dEcli e0�li ztiCeiEdcaCErk
NO
Z NNE
O M h m o
2
i./ NQait
V� 2Wa3
q
� Q N
Z Opp
ut W
)-a Otri
O
W
�y
2 n
W W
325o
0� 0
Z W K
O
ma
W h
oizwa
i=
� f
�hOQ"
U O
cg_nW
m
Z�Q
J W O
CO¢u?N
p
O
w o oz
Wj�-U
O Q N
N
O
QUA ^
UWZ
O
o 0
O QO O
I
°pew
rr
3
cn�mWW
s
0
1
oZp
w a5 �4�
Ww�,cL
jJUQZ
Ex7--
V QUWOO
W 2 W 0 N:z
I I
Packet Page -825-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
X
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
x
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING A f
Restoring Beaches as Natural Coastal Systems"
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK
MARCO ISLAND CENTRAL BEACH RE- GRADING
CONTRACT 13 -6164
5 -30 -14
The following is a scope of services for the proposed re- grading of the central section of Marco
Island beaches between DEP reference monument locations R -136 and R -142 in Collier County,
Florida. In all cases, County refers to Collier County, City refers to the City of Marco Island, DEP
refers to Department of Environmental Protection, USACE refers to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and Engineer refers to Humiston & Moore Engineers.
Task 1 Preliminary Design
1.1 Background Data Analysis
Engineer will utilize existing beach profile data and evaluate the past shoreline
trends in the vicinity of the project area since completion of the Marco Island beach
restoration project constructed in 1990/1991. Historic shoreline and nearshore
volumetric changes will be evaluated as supporting documentation to establish
nearshore trends and local sediment transport. This review will include monitoring
reports, a review of DEP files and database, and supporting documentation and
surveys from the previous permits authorized by the DEP in this project area.
Engineer will coordinate with the county, city, and the state and federal resource
agencies for details of sea turtle monitoring and shorebird monitoring data in the
project vicinity.
1.2 Engineering Analysis: Engineer will develop a regional and nearshore bathymetric
grid using existing beach profile data to evaluate the proposed impacts of re- grading
approximately 100,000 cyl from the seaward portion of the berm and swash zone to
below Mean Low Water. It is intended that the excavated material will be
redistributed seaward of the existing dune as a transition berm to reduce upland
ponding along the beach profile to improve storm protection and establish a positive
grade toward the beach area. The engineering evaluation will consider background
erosion rates and nearshore coastal process modeling. The nearshore wave climate
will be generated using offshore wave data from the National Oceanic Atmospheric
Administration (NOAH) Wave Watch III database and regional wave modeling.
1 This estimated quantity is based on the Conceptual Design completed by Humiston & Moore Engineers for Collier
County in April 2014.
Page 1 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW - draft.docx
Packet Page -826-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING -
Restoring Beaches as Natural Coastal Systems"
Evaluation of nearshore wave and flow conditions in the vicinity of the project areas
will be conducted using regional and nearshore coastal process models accepted by
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and adopted by the USACE
using the SMS software package. These models include the ADCIRC model for
regional hydrodynamics and CMS for flow, sediment transport and morphology
modeling. Additional beach morphology projections will use the Mine Model
developed by Dr. Kamphius and Dr. Dabees at Queens University. Preliminary design
and projected impact analysis will be presented to County staff for acceptance.
1.3 Preliminary Design Report: Upon acceptance of the preliminary design and impact
analysis, engineer shall prepare a preliminary design report for use as supporting
documentation for City, State and Federal regulatory review. The report will include
background shoreline trends, design objectives and coastal process modeling for
evaluation of the project design and projected nearshore and adjacent shoreline
changes. This report will include plans for the county to review and approve for filing
with the City, State and Federal regulatory agencies. This report will also include a
preliminary opinion of probable costs by engineer.
1.4 Local Meetings: Engineer will assist the county on an as- needed basis and attend up
to two meetings on Marco Island in support of the request for a letter of local
comprehensive plan consistency. Engineer will provide supporting design and
permitting progress documentation to the county and attend up to six progress
meetings including Coastal Advisory Committee meetings and Board of County
Commission meetings at the request of the county.
Task 2 State and Federal Permitting
2.1 Summary of Preliminary Design and Analysis in Presentation Format, Followed by
Pre - Application Meetings:
The results of the background analysis, modeling, alternatives analysis and
preliminary design will be summarized in a PowerPoint presentation that will be
filed with County, DEP Water Management Resources staff, and the USACE staff in
advance of pre - application meetings. The purpose of the PowerPoint presentation is
to facilitate distribution of project information for effective meetings with the state
and federal agencies. Within approximately 30 days after filing of the PowerPoint
presentation, a pre - application meeting will be held in Tallahassee with the DEP and
County. Staff of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission will be
invited to the meeting. Following the state pre - application meeting, a second
meeting will be held at the USACE Jacksonville District Ft. Myers office, and the U.S.
Page 2 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW- draft.docx
Packet Page -827-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
HUMISTON &? MOORE ENGINEERS
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING""
Restoring Beaches as Natural Coastal Systems"
Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service will be invited to
attend. The results of the meetings will be summarized and distributed to the
attendees of both meetings and referenced in the JCP application.
2.2 Preparation of JCP Submittal to DEP, Supporting Documentation, Permit Plans,
Reports, and Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) from DEP
An application will be filed with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) under the Joint Coastal Permitting program. The submittal will include permit
drawings for the proposed re- grading of the beach profile throughout the project
area, transitional berm fill details relative to existing conditions, a technical coastal
engineering design analysis report, a QA /QC plan for the beach re- grading, a
monitoring plan based on the pre - application meetings with DEP and USACE, and
submerged land public easement surveys for anticipated Consent of Use
authorization from the Board of Trustees. Sand samples and geotechnical analysis of
the sand is not contemplated as the sand compatibility should not be in question
given the excavation and filling being in relative close proximity along the active
beach profile. Engineer will encourage a site meeting with the DEP staff and FWC to
allow for evaluation of existing conditions and natural resources.
Requests for Additional Information (RAI): Engineer shall coordinate with County to
prepare response to RAls generated by DEP and their resource agency, FWC.
DEP QA /QC Plan Update: Engineer will evaluate and update the QA /QC plan format
last used by the Department for this section of the shoreline and similar work.
Engineer will coordinate with regulatory staff to accommodate any recent changes
in regulatory policy.
Monitoring: As part of the permit processing and coordination with the DEP and
Corps of Engineers, a monitoring plan will be prepared based on input from the
resource agencies. This monitoring effort will track the performance of the project
as well as any impacts on listed species.
2.3 Federal Permitting — USACE:
A copy of the JCP application will be forwarded to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
for their processing of an Individual Permit. This will include coordination with the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), the NOAA Protected Resources Division (PRD), and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS). Engineer will encourage an on -site meeting with the USACE
Page 3 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW - draft.docx
Packet Page -828-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
Requests for Additional Information (RAI): Engineer shall coordinate with the design
team and County to prepare responses to RAls generated by USACE and their
resource agencies, FWS, PRD, and NMFS. It is anticipated that the project design will
comply with the Florida Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion. It is anticipated
that during initial consultation a determination will be made regarding the
sufficiency of the Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (B.O.) for this project.
It will be intended to obtain informal consultation letters from both the FWS and
NMFS to maintain an expedited timeline. Engineer shall utilize available data for the
city and county environmental staff when addressing environmental issues.
Permit Processing Fee(s): All application fees will be filed by the County as part of
this scope of this work.
Project Specific Biological Opinion: Should the coordination with the federal
resource agencies result in the need for a project specific Biological Opinion,
Engineer shall coordinate with the design team and work with the resource agency
and assist on the preparation of the project specific Biological Opinion. One
potential issue may be the upcoming listing of the Red Knott shorebird as a federally
threatened species. This task would include an on -site meeting and coordination
with the USACE reviewer during the process. All meetings will be coordinated with
county staff. This subtask is not expected but will be added as a Not -To- Exceed task
only if required by the USACE and approved by the County.
Task 3: Finalize Plans and Technical Specification, Bid Schedule and Opinion of Probable Costs
3.1 Construction Plans and Technical Specifications, Preconstruction Beach Survev:
Update beach profile survey data throughout the project area to prepare
construction plans for bidding the project and addressing pre- construction
monitoring survey requirements. Finalize beach and berm design drawings based on
updated beach profile surveys and prepare Technical Specifications and a bid
schedule to be included with the county contract documents for bidding. As noted
above, an updated survey of the project area will be necessary to complete the
construction plans as part of this task. The most recent survey completed in March
2014 will be used in the preparation of the construction plans. An updated survey
will be conducted within 6 months of the anticipated commencement of
construction to update the plans to reflect current prevailing conditions.
Page 4 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW - draft.docx
Packet Page -829-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING
"Restoring Beaches as Natural Coastal Systems"
3.2 Opinion of Costs:
Prepare a final opinion of probable construction costs based on the final design. This
will update the preliminary opinion of probable construction costs prepared during
the initial design of this project and will include contacting other local governments,
contractor and DEP for recent costs for similar construction. Engineer will forward
the final Opinion of Probable Costs with final construction plans and technical
specifications to county for bid purposes.
Task 4: Bid Phase Services
4.1 Pre -Bid Conference:
Respond to inquiries from potential bidders and attend a pre -bid conference and
site visit with representatives of county and prospective bidders and suppliers.
4.2 Addenda to Bid Package:
Engineer will prepare addenda to bid documents and responses to requests for
information from prospective Bidders at the request of the county on an as needed
basis.
4.3 Bid Qualification: Evaluate bidders' qualifications, contact references, and prepare a
formal recommendation to county regarding awarding of the construction contract.
Task 5: Construction Phase Services
5.1 Pre - Construction Meeting:
Engineer and the county staff will conduct a pre- construction meeting with the state
and federal agencies and their respective resource agencies to present the project,
its intended performance, and schedule. The selected contractor will be present for
this meeting. Engineer will provide required notices of commencement to respective
state and federal agencies.
5.2 Construction Observation:
Engineer shall conduct daily coordination and periodic site reviews with the
contractor throughout construction. Engineer shall conduct turbidity monitoring if
required by the permit. It is estimated that construction of the project will take 60
days to complete.
5.3 Post Proiect Certifications
Page 5 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW- draft.docx
Packet Page -830-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PERMITTING
.,
IT u
RestoringBeatkes as Natural Coastal Systems"
Upon nearing project completion, the contractor, Engineer and County staff will
walk through the project to determine if the Work is substantially complete and
develop a punch list for the contractor. Once the contractor addresses all of the
items on the punch list, Engineer can recommend to the County that the project
construction be deemed substantially complete so the contractor may demobilize, if
accepted by the County. At that time retainage held by the County may be
considered eligible for release to the contractor, depending on County policy and
requirements. At this point, upon completion of the project and collection of post
construction survey data, H &M as Engineer of Record, would provide all necessary
project certifications including post dredge and as -built surveys to the County, DEP
and USACE for project and permit compliance. The as -built survey should be done to
satisfy the first post construction monitoring survey anticipated by the JCP permit.
Project certifications would include reference to a set of record as -built construction
plans. This scope of work does not include any subsequent post construction
physical or biological monitoring beyond the first survey of the beach profiles at the
completion of construction because the detailed requirements, if any, will not be
known until permit issuance.
(End Scope of Services)
Page 6 of 6
C:\ Users \hambright_g \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \LFAQVHF8 \23 -065-
Marco Beach Grading- Design and Permitting SOW - draft.docx
Packet Page -831-
Central Marco Island beach Re- Grading Project
Prepared by Humiston Moore Engineers
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
Packet Page -832-
Date:May 21, 2014
Marco Island Central Beach Re- Grading Project
1- Preliminary Design
39,404.00
1.1
Background Data Analysis
1.2
Engineering analysis
1.3
Preliminary Design Report
1.4
Local meetings
2 - State and Federal Permitting
47,264.00
2.11
Pre - application meetings
2.2
Prepare JCP Submittal, supporting documentation, plans, reports, RAI
2.3
Federal Permitting - USACE
3 - Finalize Plans, Technical Specification, Bid Schedule, Opinion of Costs
22,274.00
3.1
IConstruction Plans, Techncial Specs and Updated
survey
3.2
1 Opinion of Costs
4 - Bid Phase Services
1
6,870.00
4.11
Pre -bid conference
4.2
Addenda to Bid Package
4.3
1 Bid Qualification
5 - Construction Phase Services
53,912.00
5.11
Pre - Construction Conference
5.2lConstruction
Observation
5.3
Post Construction Certifications
Total:
169,724.00
Summary Breakdown
of Costs
RATE /UNIT
I HOURS/QT
COST
!MARKUP
AMOUNT
,Principle Engineer
2061
178
36,668.00
Senior Engineer
1571
122
19,154.00
Project Manager
1471
64
9,408.00
Engineer 1
1 123
232
28,536.00
Senior Designer
1 114
28
3,192.00
Designer 1
941
78
7,332.00
Senior Technician
851
218
18,530.00
Inspector 1
761
400
30,400.00
Technician
721
7
504.00
Cadd Technician
811
0
! 0.00
Clerical /Administrativ
621
0
0.00
PLOTTING, BOND
0.00
PLOTTING, VELLUM
0.00
SE survey
EXPENs & Env
16000
16,000.00
EXPENSE
0.00
!Project Total:
169.724.00
Packet Page -832-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
WORK ORDERIPURCHASE ORDER
Contract 13- 6164 -CZ Wrchitect & Engineering"
Contract Expiration Date: March 8, 2019 ✓
This Work Order is for professional Engineering services for work known as: Marco Island Central
Beach Re- Grading
Project Name: Marco Island Central Beach Re- Grading
Project No: 195 -90062 ✓
The work is specified in the proposal dated May 30, 2014 which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Work Order. In accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, this
Work Order /Purchase Order is assigned to: Humiston & Moore Engineers
Scope of Work: As detailed in the attached proposal and the following:
• Task I Preliminary Design
• Task II State and Federal Permitting
• Task III Finalize plans, Technical Specification, Bid Schedule, Opinion of Costs
• Task IV Bid Phase Services
• Task V Construction Phase Services
Schedule of Work: Complete work within 365 days from the date of the Notice to Proceed which is
accompanying this Work Order. The Consultant agrees that any Work Order that extends beyond the
expiration date of Agreement No. 13- 6164 -CZ will survive and remain subject to the terms and
conditions of that Agreement until the completion or termination of this Work Order.
Compensation: In accordance with the Agreement referenced above, the County will compensate the
Firm in accordance with following method(s): ❑Negotiated Lump Sum (NLS) ❑Lump Sum Plus
Reimbursable Costs (LS +RC) ®Time & Material (T&M) (established hourly rate — Schedule A) ❑
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), (define which method Will be used for which tasks) as provided in the
attached proposal.
Task 1
$ 39,404.00 (T &M)
Task 11
$ 47,264.00 (T &M) 'f
Task III
$ 22,274.00 (T &M)
Task IV
$ 6,870.00 (T&M) 'r
Task V
$ 53,912.00 (T&M),,'
TOTAL FEE $169,724.00 (T&M) V_
PREPARED BY: .. � Zi A," Z)9-G4-
11 G ii, MCA in, P.E C 1 Manager Date
7
APPROVED BY:
illiamreLorenz, D�partu ent Director Date
Page 1 of 2
Packet Page -833-
1 APPROVED BY:
WCasalada, Vision Administrator
ACCEPTED BY: Humiston & Moore Engineers
Mohamed A. Dabees, P.E. Vice President
5
Packet Page -834-
6/24/2014 16.A.19.
Date
C,;�, /,3 /
Date
Page 2 of 2