Loading...
Agenda 06/24/2014 Item # 9D6/24/2014 9.D. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), to approve the excavation and off -site hauling of 1,050,000 cubic yards of fill; to increase the size of the preserve tract and add permitted uses; to amend the RPUD Master Plan and to provide for amendments to list of Developer Commitments; and providing an effective date. The subject property is located one mile north of U.S. 41 and 1 -1/2 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 688 + /- acres (Petition number PUDA- PL20140000342). This is a companion to Agenda item 11B. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and to ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The Naples Reserve RPUD currently allows for a maximum of 1,154 residential units, uses accessory to residential uses, a recreation area, and a preserve. As part of the residential development, several lakes have been approved. Commercial excavation has been approved for all lakes shown on the master plan. The Naples Reserve RPUD project was originally approved in Ordinance Number 2007 -71 on November 13, 2007. (Please see Attachment: Ordinance number 2007 -71.) The PUD was amended on July 24, 2012 to remove the golf course from the development and to increase the amount of fill that could be removed from the permitted commercial excavation. Some of the excavated fill was to be used for the Tamiami Trail East/US 41 roadway widening project (between Collier Boulevard and CR 92). (Please see Attachment: Ordinance number 2012 -29.) The primary purpose of this PUD amendment is to further increase the quantity of fill that can be removed from the commercial excavation to a total of 1,050,000 cubic yards and to expand the destination area of the till to a 10 mile radius from the subject site. A concurrent application has also been submitted to amend the existing excavation permit. (Please see companion petition Commercial Excavation Permit PL 20140000342.) The Naples Reserve RPUD is also being amended to allow TDB's (Transfer of Development Rights) to be acquired consistent with a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) that was approved for adoption by the BCC on June 10, 2014. The GMPA will allow a limited exclusion specific to the Naples Reserve RPUD to permit a percentage of TDR Credits to be severed and transferred from any lands designated Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District to this RPUD. Packet Page -173- 6/24/2014 9.D. The Amendment proposes the following changes to the Transportation section of PUD Ordinance Exhibit F, Developer Commitments: • The destination of excavated material is expanded to a 10 mile radius from Naples Reserve RPUD. (Previously the majority of the material was limited to the US 41 widening project.) • The total amount of excavated material is increased and shall not exceed 1,050,000 cubic yards. • Hours of operation for truck hauling shall be limited to 8 AM to 5 PM, Monday- Friday. Excavation hours shall be limited to 7 AM to 5 PM, Monday- Friday. Rock crushing shall only occur between 8 AM and 5 PM, Monday— Friday. Blasting shall only occur between 9 AM and 4 PM, Monday- Friday. • A secondary access point shall be provided off of Greenway Road prior to export of excavation materials. • The maximum number of fill truck trips shall not exceed 140 exiting trips per day. • Prior to commencement of off -site removal of fill, the Developer will improve Greenway Road by providing a 24 -foot wide (paved and stabilized) roadway. Within 60 days of completion of the excavation activities and associated export of surplus embankment material, the Developer shall restore the 24 -foot wide paved area and restripe in accordance with Collier County Transportation Department direction. • Off -site removal of fill shall be completed within two years of approval of the commercial excavation permit. The Developer may request an extension of up to one year, beyond this two year period, from the Collier County Planning Commission. In any event, the excavation shall terminate no later than 3 years after the approval of this PUD Amendment. • There shall be no stacking of excavation - related vehicles including haul trucks on Greenway Road. The minimum distance to the rock crushing location shall be 2,000 feet from the south PUD boundary. At Utilities Staff request, a Utilities and Engineering Commitment has been added to provide a water main interconnection between Naples Reserve RPUD and Winding Cypress PUD. At Environmental Staff s request, a list of permitted uses for the Tract P Preserve has been added to PUD Exhibit A: Project Land Use Tracts. Staff has also requested some grammatical changes to the PUD document along with an enlarged Master Plan that is now two pages instead of one page. No letters of objection or support have been received. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund Packet Page -174- 6/24/2014 9.D. projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the Future Land Use Element. A more detailed description of the GMP consistency is contained in the Staff Report. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDA- PL20140000342, Naples Reserve RPUD (Residential Planned Unit Development on June 5, 2014, and by a vote of 6 to 1 recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval. The Commissioner who dissented indicated that there was no logical reason not to shorten the haul route by including Naples Reserve Boulevard in the haul route instead of relying only on Greenway Boulevard. Therefore, the Commissioner found the petition to be incompatible with the Greenway Boulevard neighborhood and inconsistent with PUD Findings 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 and inconsistent with Rezone Findings 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Naples Reserve RPUD (Ordinance No. 07 -71, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal. is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for RPUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained Packet Page -175- 6/24/2014 9.D. at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? Packet Page -176- 6/24/2014 9.D. 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ( "reasonably ") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.] 06, art.11], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC). RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for PUDA- PL201400000342, Naples Reserve Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). Packet Page -177- 6/24/2014 9. D. Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA Planning & Zoning Attaclvnents: 1) Staff Report 2) Proposed Ordinance 3) Ordinance Number 2007 -71 4) Ordinance number 2012 -29 5) Location Map 6) Master Plan 7) Application- go to: httv: / /Nvww.collier2ov. net /ftt) /A2endaJune24 /GrovAhMiamt /ADD ] ication - Naples Reserve -PUDA- OP.pdf Packet Page -178- COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.9.D. 6/24/2014 9.D. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), to approve the excavation and off -site hauling of 1,050,000 cubic yards of fill; to increase the size of the preserve tract and add permitted uses; to amend the RPUD Master Plan and to provide for amendments to list of Developer Commitments; and providing an effective date. The subject property is located one mile north of U.S. 41 and 1 -1/2 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 688+/ - acres (Petition number PUDA- PL20140000342). This is a companion to Agenda item 11B. Meeting Date: 6/24/2014 Prepared By Name: GundlachNancy Title: Planner, Principal, Comprehensive Planning 5/23/2014 4:19:52 PM Approved By Name: BosiMichael Title: Director - Planning and Zoning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 6/9/2014 4:41:08 PM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development & Environmental Services Date: 6/10/2014 2:25:43 PM Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 6/10/2014 3:17:29 PM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning Date: 6/10/2014 3:39:46 PM Packet Page -179- Name: AshtonHeidi 6/24/2014 9.D. Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation Date: 6/11/2014 4:37:04 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mngmt Svs, Office of Management & Budget Date: 6/12/2014 2:47:15 PM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 6/13/2014 10:03:53 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 6/16/2014 9:48:07 AM Packet Page -180- AGENDA ITE_.6/24/2014 9.D. il Collier County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: MAY 15, 2014 SUBJECT: PUDA- PL20140000342, NAPLES RESERVE RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) APPLICANTfOWNER: SFI Naples Reserve, LLC 3232 W. Lake Mary Blvd., Ste. 1410 Lake Mary, FL 32746 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENTS: Mr. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovnovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 07 -71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), to approve the excavation and off -site hauling of 1,050,000 cubic yards of fill; to increase the size of the preserve tract and add permitted uses; to amend the RPUD Master Plan and to provide for amendments to list of Developer Commitments; and providing an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 688± acre PUD (Planned Unit Development) is located approximately one mile north of Tamiami Trail East (US -41) and 1.3 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) in Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the proceeding page.) Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 1 el 15 Packet Page -181- -9 .4 -C 6/24/2014 9.D. m MN till ,2 � 0 j R Ow 8 tSill 10 m MN vaCKei rage -iz5L- z z 0 N 4t z 0 C) 0 -i ,2 � 0 j R Ow 8 tSill 10 vaCKei rage -iz5L- z z 0 N 4t z 0 C) 0 -i 6/24/2014 9.D. MASTER PLAN A, AGRICULTURE. ,'PDYLHYfAi: ncAYL*+- S1RAw STATE C'ORESI' : NOR -4 iR+E .. / or SECTION 7 FVTUitE'.kCGE55 Z i / 2° 570fl:t2' Y - �` 3E9 uTL'W 7lDSi2' Y' z I , k , min ! PAST LINE. Cf ' t /.... -. SECTION 1: 20 10W. TYRE 1j ti'BUFPER. ,� 1 ! t't r R s x R . A. AGRIQA7URE s3B R R: mfr ^.n*ii (,[ AGRK1GI1fRAl . ff c$ �.J. R. s' POTABLE WATER 4AIfi:`� / '+., ,�I "•J r \' 1 Y1 ' 4 WT£RCONNECT'. STUB -CUT l i R R j • R R 1 i'l R (k :(SEE UTILITY COMMIWENT : i r� 4Qw 'B' IN EXKBIT.F OF TF'.E'. QP116 ORDINANCE EXHIMgJr r r R ftt f. ° > : t k f ! ir-•' £ ,r'.^ 1 -I ri .i t I 1 T0B' RESERYA`RDN PER O.R. 2453 PC. 1351 P117}7tnA FUTURE J I (MAY BE VACATED, .SEE NOTE 7) GATED ACCESS R .R z ' ��• ''° - (NAY BE t � �:` R \ R . ) y . R2acArp) l -.. " It . r '� R !f 20' MIN. TYPE ' '` • `r •f _ , ,.. V BUFFER c ow EAEfii R l�l rf I PRE9F7tYE TRACT t r R. a4E R i;- tf1s'a f3 �!•67Ef+Ti/.LP 5ERvE !:..; K `;+ > - r�i i+-n- 1 �. k y 1j ' "f:,�, f ! t .ROAD 1c.: r R (t # N ROAD .� R �N5Pp�YATIt�Mt "L ftil;' i � Ccoml O EXHIBIT f QF ,i R R�1 \ fl -�O. 411. K E%F11BlTS."' A, ` 1; iftl R •' R. 4 f:. ` V JJ. it1t RA f1 t c. hI t Y ;.t t1� L RA ! ( CL 3?iE k t�!! It£ t i RA R 4 }' K TDO,too`YIIjf f ,1�` \ R } :R COLLIER CWNTY 3 1 RL EASE)AENT DCSTSNC coxsatvATRYN i i t-'tf t - -� - -.,P, ` \. ' R - R EA5EMiti'IT PEk O.R. BOOk. 7 ,`- t { R' ':t i V 3112 PAGES 277- 2RS-•; I, 'Y'/ : �� PRX-MVE TRACT' _ f-', .R `�. R_ J f �- ,' E1B�nNG GolNSERvAT(D.�t „ •�- - y� , WcSI LINE / "3` Y - EASt.1f"IT Pcf� O.R.. 1. I� Of 5TCAUN Y tl I J,. / - � 80ati 1112 PA6Es 117 294- t R 1. ':..e ,FUTURE I t .wPOTETRTIi:C PRES'RYE BOUNDARY. R POIENT.AL &} ;. 1RANSPARTATIO'1 ,.. ` 004' TOD' - R EXISTING 60 ROAD EASENEN R ' . Cn'RCC ' FUTURE ACCESS �:. f jJp/° .COMIa1T8t'I T", A` ' -IN C9110T -�'"' ...' \. C0�.S�ER COUNTY PER CRi 2463 F.G. - 1551 ACCESS - t;I 0€ MG RPT1C QRRMNANCE G%Nt i$ 1'l U EASEMENT � (MAY B_ VkVATEtl SEE NOTE 7) j. ���. (MAY BE LRIE use az w s la s w a T f ses-22 x z,ts.e3.F OF SECTION 1 srvx57: w 2T76.16'.P I k 111W ACCESS EASEWN7 - 20' MIN. TYPE f PER O,R 2d42. PAS 5ti5 EXISMG 60' ROAD EASEMERrT PUDr WALNUT LAKES 'O' BUFFER, COUNTY ° COLLIER cDUNrY' PER D.R. ;2403 P -c. 13BI .. PARTIALLY -DMOPM WaL EASEMENT WAY BE VACARED, MZ NOTE 7) - Packet Page -183- 6/24/2014 9.D. MASTER PLAN (continued) 30 A fw' 5�1&t IN CUT PROJECT LOCA7nlO THE LDC PROVISIONS FROM N CM 7-� SECTIO 5.06.OZEL.6 ARE. APPUCABLE FOR OFF. - PREMISE SIONAGE--- pp" L LEGAL DESCRIPTIOt-t SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP SISMIK RANGE 26 FAST RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. VATHIN THE PUD BOUNDARIES THERE VALL BE A MINIMUM OF. 60% OF OPEN SPACE IN THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE AND 70% OPEN SPACE IN THE RURAL FRINGE, 2, THE REQUIRED 60% AND 70% OPEN SPACE:(SEE CHART BELOW) SHALL BE: PROVIDED. 3. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOW ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE 4, THE DESIGN, LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF. THE LAND I AND I . WPR I OVEMENTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SUP APPROVAL OR. CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. 5. THE LAKE AND OPEN SPACE AREAS ALONG THE. NORTH BOUNDARY SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF LDC SECTION M5.07.G.3. 6- THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 41.1 ACRES OF NATIVE PRESERVE WITHIN THE RPUD., 7. SHOULD THE FASTING W ME ROADWAY EASEMENT ON M SOUTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARIES BE VACATED OR EXTINGUISHED, THE 20 FOOT. ME TYPE V BUFFER VALL BE LOWED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. fl. THE PRESERVE SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED 104TH. ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS TO SATISFY BOTH LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LDC- LEGEND: LANE) USE SUMMARY NCj LAND USE ACRFAC EyJSrNr PRESERVE TRACT "R' ' RES87ENT11AL 5113.9 LAKE TRACT 'Rh- KFCREATIONAL 31.6. k. PUSUC RIGHT-OF-WAY RFsrRvA.'nvN TRACT PRESOWE 7. TOTAL 688.I_ EkIsma RbAbWAY EASEMENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE SUMMARY E772771 POTE"MAI ILITURE AREA L. USE ACREAGE C=ACE ACREAGE 'JR OPTIONAL 71 3 OPTi 0 CATE ROUSE ENTRY FEATURE Rm 377.12 7D% 216196 GREEINWAY/MUL71-USE PATHWAY LJRF f 3110,94 60% 18636 RA RECREATION AREA (PER PLAT) P PRESERVE TRACT DENSFY SUMMARY DENSITY DESCRIPTION R RMDEN71AL TRACT OUIAC UNITS MAXIMUM DENSITY WffR5-U:rF- TDR CREDITS 0.78 .342 ASV WAUM DENNTY WITH I w TL54 TDR CREDITS Packet Page -184- 6/24/2014 9.D. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Naples Reserve RPUD currently allows for a maximum of 1,154 residential units, uses accessory to residential uses, a recreation area, and a preserve. As part of the residential development, several lakes have been approved. Commercial excavation has been approved for all lakes shown on the master plan. The Naples Reserve RPUD project was originally approved in Ordinance Number 2007 -71 on November 13, 2007. (Please see Attachment C: Ordinance number 2007 -71.) The PUD was amended on July 24, 2012 to remove the golf course from the development and to increase the amount of fill that could be removed from the permitted commercial excavation. Some of the excavated fill was to be used for the Tamiami Trail East/US 41 roadway widening project (between Collier Boulevard and CR 92). (Please see Attachment B: Ordinance number 2012 -29.) The primary purpose of this PUD amendment is to further increase the quantity of fill that can be removed from the commercial excavation to a total of 1,050,000 cubic yards and to expand the destination area of the fill to a 10 mile radius from the subject site. A concurrent application has also been submitted to amend the existing excavation permit. The Naples Reserve RPUD is also being amended to allow TDR's (Transfer of Development Rights) to be acquired consistent with a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) that is proceeding towards approval. The GMPA will allow a limited exclusion specific to the Naples Reserve RPUD to permit a percentage of TDR Credits to be severed and transferred from any lands designated Sending within the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District to this RPUD. The Amendment proposes the following changes to the Transportation section of PUD Ordinance Exhibit F, Developer Commitments: • The destination of excavated material is expanded to a 10 mile radius from Naples Reserve RPUD. (Previously the majority of the material was limited to the US 41 widening project.) • The total amount of excavated material is increased and shall not exceed 1,050,000 cubic yards. • Hours of operation are limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday thru Friday. At Utilities Staff request, a Utilities and Engineering Commitment has been added to provide a water main interconnection between Naples Reserve RPUD and Winding Cypress PUD, At Environmental Staff s request, a list of permitted uses for the Tract P Preserve has been added to PUD Exhibit A: Project Land Use Tracts. Staff has also requested some grammatical changes to the PUD document along with an enlarged Master Plan that is now two pages instead of one page. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Picayune Strand State Forest, with a zoning designation of Agriculture (A) Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Page 5 of 15 Packet Page -185- 6/24/2014 9.D. East: Agriculture and disturbed lands with a zoning designation of Agriculture (A) South: Preserve areas within a residential development, vacant land and then agriculture, with a zoning designation of Walnut Lakes PUD and Agriculture (A). West: Residential development with a zoning designation of Winding Cypress DRI (Development of Regional Impact) AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The subject site is zoned Naples Reserve RPUD and designated partly Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands and partly Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (URF) on the Future Land Use Map. The 688- acre subject site is undeveloped and the PUD provides for a maximum gross density of 1.68 dwelling units per acre (DUA). This petition relies on recently transmitted, to be adopted (as of June 10, 2014 BCC (Board of Collier County Commissioners)) provisions in the Future Land Use Element to achieve consistency. That amendment (ref. CP- 2013 -1) allows the Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Page 6 of 15 Packet Page -186- 6/24/2014 9.D. transfer of TDR credits origmating .core distant than one (1) mile 1frOom use UNT boundary for use in the Naples Reserve PUD. Adopted Ordinance 2007 -71, and including the amending Ordinance 2012 -29 (deleting an 18 hole Golf Course and deleting a Neighborhood Village Commercial Center) — both allow a maximum of 1154 DU's (dwelling units) (or 1.677 DU /A) and a requirement for a minimum of 612 TDR Credits to be obtained in order to achieve the allowed maximum density. Of these, a minimum of 311 TDR credits must be obtained from Sending Lands within one mile of the Urban area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. Please refer to the Zoning analysis section of this Staff Report. In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject property does not front a collector or arterial road, as classified by the Transportation Element. The proposed PUD Master Plan depicts primary access to US 41 East (an arterial road) via Naples Reserve Boulevard, and a secondary, future access onto Greenway Road.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [The proposed PUD Master Plan depicts a main internal road configuration with multiple internal roundabouts and numerous connecting local streets. Internal accesses are provided to neighboring properties in an effort to reduce specific vehicle (haul truck) congestion on US 41.1 Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [This PUD is located approximately 11/ miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), and approximately % mile north of US 41 East, north of the Reflection Lakes development (Walnut Lakes PUD). 0 Lands to the north lie inside the Picayune Strand State Forest and are owned by the State of Florida — where interconnection is not possible. Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 7 of 15 Packet Page -187- 6/24/2014 9.D. Greenway Road lies to the east of the subject RPUD, and land further east is in agricultural use — where interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as "Future Gated Access ". The entire eastern boundary is shown with an existing 60 ft. wide road easement. • A portion of the land to the south is zoned Walnut Lakes PUD and developed as Reflection Lakes of Naples; and, undeveloped land zoned A, Rural Agricultural — where interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as "Potential Future Access ". A portion of the southern boundary is shown with an existing 60 ft. wide road easement. • Land to the west of the subject RPUD is zoned Winding Cypress PUD/DRI (Development of Regional Impact) and partially developed as Verona Walk — where interconnection is shown on the RPUD Master Plan as "Potential Future Gated Access ". ] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [The PUD amendments being proposed do not relate to this Policy.] Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 -year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Natural Resources Department Staff reviewed this petition and determined the proposed amendment to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). GMP Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5, Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings "), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings "), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, Staff offers the following analyses: Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 8 of 15 Packet Page -188- 6/24/2014 9.D. Environmental Review: ?Natural Resources Depart�..ent staff has reviev�ed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. The minimum acreage of native preservation required to be retained within the PUD is 41.1 acres and has been included in Exhibit F of the proposed PUD Ordinance. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval. This approval is subject to the adoption of the Transportation Commitments provided in Exhibit F of the proposed PUD Ordinance and to the following condition of approval: 1. "Within 45 days of the approval of this PUD Ordinance, the Developer shall provide a 5 -foot wide paved area along the east side of Greenway Road with flex stakes at 20 -feet on center in order to provide a pedestrian zone." Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval subject to the adoption of the Utility and Engineering Commitment to provide a water main interconnect as described in Exhibit F of the proposed PUD Ordinance. Emergency Management Review: The Emergency Management staff has reviewed the petition and has no concerns. Zoning and Land Development Review: Relationship to Existing and Future Land Uses: A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the uses that would be permitted if the proposed zoning action is approved, as it relates to the requirement or limitations set forth in the FLUE of the GMP. The primary change as noted previously is to further increase the amount of fill that can be removed from the commercial excavation to 1,050,000 cubic yards and to expand the destination area of the fill to a 10 mile radius from the subject site. The increase in commercial excavation will have an impact on traffic in the neighboring area. The approved Commercial Excavation Permits and associated Executive Summary (see Attachment D) indicate that Greenway Road will be widened and will be the primary haul route. There will be an increase in the number of trips from 107 to 280 daily two -way trips for a period of time. No changes to the approved maximum density are being proposed as part of this amendment request. This PUD amendment does not propose any changes that would adversely affect environmental, buffer, or drainage issues. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 9 of 15 Packet Page -189- 6/24/2014 9.D. The currently approved type and pattern of residential development was determined to be suitable when the subject PUD was approved. However, as previously stated, the increase in commercial excavation will have an impact on traffic in the local neighborhood. The approved Commercial Excavation Permits and associated Executive Summary (see Attachment D) indicate that Greenway Road will be widened and is the primary haul route. There will be an increase in the number of trips from 107 to 280 daily two -way trips for a period of time. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. The PUD document and the general LDC development regulations make appropriate provisions for the continuing operation and maintenance of common areas. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMT discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP, dependent upon the adoption of the companion GMP amendment. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The currently approved development, landscaping and buffering standards were determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself when the PUD was previously approved. Staff believes that this amendment will not change the project's compatibility, both internally and externally, with the proposed amendments. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The existing open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. b. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Page 10 of 15 Packet Page -190- 6/24/2014 9.D. Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., the GMP is consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. This proposed PUD Amendment will not adversely impact the previous BCC finding that the subject property and surrounding areas can accommodate expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed PUD amendment and proposed GMP amendment are consistent with all applicable elements of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). 2. The existing land use pattern. This amendment will not affect the existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern will remain the same. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Not applicable. The districts are existing and established. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Not applicable. The districts are existing and established. Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 panty 11 of 15 Packet Page -191- 6/24/2014 9.D. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to increase the quantity of commercial fill that is exported from the subject site. 6 Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The amendment will increase the amount of commercial excavation traffic for a period of time in the neighborhood. However, through the Excavation Permit Conditions, the community will receive the benefit of permanent roadway improvements to Greenway Boulevard and to US 41 (Tamiami Trail East) in exchange for accommodating the gravel haul operation which is expected to cease near the end of 2016 /early 2017. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safely. The proposed amendment will adversely impact local area traffic circulation for the duration of the commercial exporting of the fill material. 8, Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed amendment will not affect drainage. Furthermore, the subject site is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Not applicable. The proposed amendment will not change the previously approved development standards that affect the amount of light and air to the adjacent area. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD amendment will not adversely impact property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around this property are already partially developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and /or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 12 of 15 Packet Page -192- 6/24/2014 9.D. TO a r .. t r individual I iethe'r the propose" change wily CoiYScitiice u grant o/ Special privilege to an owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed PUD amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The property already has a PUD zoning designation and could be developed within the parameters of that zoning ordinance; however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in compliance with LDC provisions for such amendments. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood and the county. 15, Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a PUD amendment. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16 The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these residential sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities for and the project. It must be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 pans 4 I of 1 ri Packet Page -193- 6/24/2014 9.D. the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of oer vice will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING INIMI: The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on April 9, 2014, at 5:30 p.m. at the South Regional Library, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, Florida. Four people along with the applicant and County Staff attended the meeting. For further information, please see the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Summary (Attachment E). The meeting ended at approximately 6:15 p.m. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDA- PL20140000342, revised on April 22, 2014, RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDA- PL20140000342 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval of this amendment subject to the following condition of approval: 1. "Within 45 days of the approval of this PUD Ordinance, the Developer shall provide a 5 -foot wide paved area along the east side of Greenway Road with flex stakes at 20 -feet on center in order to provide a pedestrian zone," Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 May 5, 2014 Paae 14 of 15 Packet Page -194- PREPARED BY: N" aAN� 111/1� �Pyi � a NANCY D CH, AI P, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE GROWT A EMENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAYMO V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER "- DATE GROWTXA4ANAGEMENT DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION APPROVED BY: NICK`CASALANGUI9 , ADMINISTRATOR DATE - GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Attachments: A. Ordinance B. Ordinance number 12 -29 C. Ordinance number 07 -71 D. Commercial Excavation Permits and associated Executive Summary E. NIM Synopsis Naples Reserve RPUD, PUDA- PL20140000342 April 22, 2014 Paae 15 of 15 Packet Page -195- 6/24/2014 9.D. 6/24/2014 9.D. ORDINANCE NO. 14 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07- 71, AS AMENDED, THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD), TO APPROVE THE EXCAVATION AND OFF -SITE HAULING OF 1,050,000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL; TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE PRESERVE TRACT AND ADD PERMITTED USES; TO AMEND THE RPUD MASTER PLAN AND TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENTS TO LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF U.S. 41 AND 1 -1/2 MILES EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 688 + /- ACRES. [PUDA- PL201400003421 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 07 -71, which established the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD); and WHEREAS, On July 24, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida approved Ordinance No. l 2 -29, which amended the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD; and WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester representing SFI Naples Reserve, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance 07 -71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMh11SSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1: Amendments to Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD The List of Permitted Uses, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit A, List of Permitted Uses, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Naples Reserve RPUD Pale 1 oft PUDA- PL20140000.42 — rev. 6!6/14 Packet Page -196- 6/24/2014 9.D. SECTION II: Amendments to Exhibit C, Master Plan, of Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD The Master Plan, previously attached as Exhibit C to Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit C, Master Plan, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: Amendments to Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, of Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD The List of Developer Commitments, previously attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance Number 07 -71, as amended, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION IV: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton -Cicko ` Managing Assistant County Attorney TOM HENNING, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit F — List of Development Commitments C P\ 14-CPS-01 302/56 Naples Reserve RPUD Page 2 of 2 PUDA- PL20I40000342 —rev. 6/6/14 Packet Page -197- NAPLES RESERVE RPUD EXHIBIT A PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TYPE TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL TRACT "RA" RECREATION AREA TRACT "P" PRESERVE 1. TRACT R PERMITTED USES: UNITS /FT. ACREAGE± 1154 -59_ 583.9 p 31.6 Q 63-7-72.6 TOTAL: 688.1 6/24/2014 9.D. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Single - family detached dwellings; 2) Single- family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 3) Villa /patio dwellings (detached single- family dwellings of a smaller scale than the typical single- family detached dwelling); 4) Multi- family dwellings; 5) Model homes; 6) Commercial excavations for all lakes identified as "L" on Exhibit C — RPUD Master Plan (subject to Exhibit F: List of Developer Commitments, 1lansplrtati,l, Item D); 7) Project sales, construction and administrative office, which may occur in residential, and /or in temporary structures; 8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (" BZA'') by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Page l of 15 Words underlined ute added. words b are deleted 1- 1,13012 \2012103\WP\PLIDA \Post CCPCWaples Reserve RPUD (PLIDA -PL- 2014 - 0342) 6-5-14 docx Packet Page -198- 6/24/2014 9.D. B, Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to, private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures, gatehouses, and other outdoor recreation facilities; 2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections, 11. TRACT RA PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development: 1) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private, intended for use by the residents and their guest only); 2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playground improvements /facilities,yand passive and /or active water features. 3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and, or facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping. III. TRACT P PERMITTED USES: No building or structure or part thereof. shall be erected. altered or used, or land used. in whole or in part. for other than the following: Page 2 of 15 Words underlined are added, words strt+ek thrfweh are deleted H_A20I ",2012103MPAPUDATost CCPC\Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA -111--2014- 0342') 6- 5- 14.docx Packet Page -199- 6/24/2014 9.D. A. Principal Uses: I ) Preservation of native habitat. B. Accessory Uses: 1) Storm water management treatment, conveyance facilities, and _structures. such as berms swales, and outfall structures. 2) Pervious and impervious pathways and boardwalks, consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.I. 3) Shelters without walls. 4) Educational sianage and bulletin boards located on or immediately adiacent to the pathway_ 5) Benches for seating. 6) Viewing platforms. Conservation- related and recreational activities comparable in nature with the aforementioned uses. as determined by the County Manager or designee. Paoe 3 of 15 Words underlined are added. words AFHek !hFs gh are deleted H^w012`,20121031WP1PUDATost CCPC \Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA -PL ?014- ©34 -1)b- 5- 14.doex Packet Page -200- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN A, AGPJCiJLTLAE POTENTIAL pKAyLNE STRAND STATE FOREST NOR'" LINE FU 'Upr ICCCSS OF SECTION I R R R N SECTION I V R 2v.wk R R si R R R A, AGRICULTURE 1 AGUCULTURAL R R L-7 R R R V R lT 'N EXHNIT OF THE ------ qj, �x r,IVI"- R-O 1-0-T PCP GA 240 PG. 1351 R {MAY HE VACATM, SCE NOTE L 'n c R R R R QCA :V) R -3' BU�FER —7-7 R 20' mm- -YPT t4fi X10') R COUIFIR COLINTY YF11 CA ,MEN( rXISTINC R "n TRACT' :-y PRESERVE MtACT- R rn POTE"6-, RrAD 111,1$ LEE 'u R 0 < cd ot PA RA, ' I < 'I, P I " 1 1. 1 - , -- f� 9 RA Page 7 of 15 Words underlined are added, words suweji gir-aug are deleted H:'-20 I 21,20l2l03\WR\11UDA\Post CCPC\Nap]es Reserve RPUD (PUDA-PL-20 14-0342) 6-5-14 docx Packet Page -201- RA H R We EAKMENT 'y -N PER OR W;01: PRESERVE TRACI R P LA!,.f4L%j Rik, Q,R A 90212 fA R .'*O\ I 1UT1 N Ilk TRANZ DgWigN :A, IN CO-1 CR 'CUNT,( WC AS--VCNT �OAD ��SLMW' ) PER OR. 240 1381 '-.0 *- i (VAY B 'C (NAY fit VACAITO. L NOTE 7) NAPLES RESERVE BLVD. L' L OF SEC90N 1 i1a, 20' .1. TYK 6',)* WO�-- CASI-MEW PUD, WAUAJT LAKES '.OJN PEP, OR 2463 1-1— 1381 PARTIALLY DEVELOPED i, fml- SEE NOTT -) Page 7 of 15 Words underlined are added, words suweji gir-aug are deleted H:'-20 I 21,20l2l03\WR\11UDA\Post CCPC\Nap]es Reserve RPUD (PUDA-PL-20 14-0342) 6-5-14 docx Packet Page -201- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXATIZIBIT C MASTER PLAN (continued) A V1, THE CDC PROVISIONS FROM SECTION !,DF 02,9.6 ARE APPLICABLE F6R OcT-PREMISE SICNACE - PROJECT 5 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTIOt-t SLC!IQN I. TCWI4SH,P 51 SOUTH, HANCE 26 LAS' RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1, WITHIN THE FUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 60% 0;* OPEN SPACE IN THE - URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE AND 70% OPEN SPACE IN THE RURAL FRINGE. THE REWIRED 6OZ AND 70% OPEN SPACE (SIFF CHART BELOW) SHALL HE PROVIDED. THE FA:%I -'I "j ES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALT. BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NkrJRE, 4. THE DES!0N, LOCATON AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT SDP APPROVAL OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. THE L,-..KE AND OPEN SPACE AREAS ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY SATISFY THE REOLdREMENTS 01 LDI, SECTION 3,05.07-G-3, & THERE SHAI1 BE A MINIMUM OF A; "1 AMES OF NATIVE- PRESERVE WITHIN THE RI`VD, 7 SHOULD THE EXISTING ED' WIDE ROADWAY EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARIES BE VACAT11) OR EXTINGUISHED. THE 20 FOOT WIDE TYPE V BUFFER WLL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. 8, THE PRESERVE SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADD'TIDNAL PLANTINGS TO SATISFY BOTH LANDSCAPE BUTTER RUDJIREMENTS AND NATIVE PRESERVE: REOUIREUENTS DF THE LDC, LEGIEND- LAND USE SUMMARY TILACT LS AaEAa EVISTINC PRESERVE *-z- I RA C T- R FS*-z--rTTA1, 583.9 LAKE TR 4CT RN. I RFCRArATV.)N'AI RrA TRACT P' PU-14-Y, VE PUSUC WGHT-OF-WAY NMRVATION I I CITAI OEXISTNC 40ADWAY EASEMENT I REQUIRED OPEN SPACE SUMMARY POJENPAL FUTLIRZ REZRrATION AREA " �I-AIIILI 1111 113.TA- --T)ONA. GATT HCUSE ENTRY FZATJR1 1,11 177,12 CRELNWAY/NJLT-USE PATHWAY 1 3W.94--- -- b0 V;6-% RA RECREAtION AREA (PER PLAT) DENS" SUMMARY p P;Z-'S:RVI TRKT itLSOENIIAL TRACT OYSckply),,I :)L),'A, UNITS i.01AUNI 01INSIT) WfTl-ii3l17 54., T13R CRI-D75 &'� -YI L R Page 8 of 15 WardS Underlined are added, words strueli thraugh are deleted 1-1:'C012\2012103\WF"\PUDA\Post CCPC\Nuples Reserve RPUD (PUDA-PL-2014-0342) 6-5-14.doex Packet Page -202- EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS TRANSPORTATION 6/24/2014 9.D. This development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The RPUD Master Plan reflects a 100' wide reservation for dedication along the western boundary of the RPUD. Should the County find it is appropriate to improve that corridor, the Peveleper Owner, its successor, or assigns shall agree to be a part of a joint permit application with Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing conservation easement. All costs associated with the potential conservation easement modification, including any required mitigation shall be responsibility of the County. The 100' reservation shall be dedicated by the Owner to the County at no cost, and in fee simple title within 180 days of the County's request. The develeper Owner shall provide a storm water management system within RPUD boundary for treatment /retention of storm water from the 100 foot reservation area. B. The Developer agrees to provide mitigation for traffic impacts as detailed in the companion Developer's Contribution Agreement [DCA] in order to provide consistency with policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan." The DCA provides for improvements to the intersection of US -41 and Collier Boulevard, and /or US -41 east of Collier Boulevard. C. if warranted and approved by the County, the develeper Owner shall be responsible for the proportionate fair share cost of a traffic signal, or turn lane extension /expansion at the intersection of Naples Reserve Boulevard and US -41 Tamiami Trail, If Naples Reserve Boulevard should become a Public Roadway in the future, then the proportionate share requirement shall apply to this development's entrance where it intersects with Naples Reserve Boulevard. Upon completion of the installation, inspection, burn -in period and final approval /acceptance of traffic signal at either location mentioned in the previous paragraph, ownership and maintenance of the signal shall be turned over to Collier County. Any negations relevant to fair share payments or reimbursements from any and all other neighboring developers /property owners that direct benefit from said traffic signal, will be determined based upon the percentage of usage /impact.'' D. Excavated material of the tetal volume e *na may be removed from the development ��i thedeveaeptzlief+t and be transported off -site eta for use in the US -41 roadway widening project from the intersection of US 41 and Collier Boulevard to the intersection of US 41 Page I 1 of 15 Words underlined are added. words -•- � '� ^ � ,-'^ are deleted 11:\20121-)012103CWP1PLJDA \Post CCPCINaples Reserve RPUD (PtJDA -PL -2014 -0342) 6- 5- 14.docx Packet Page -203- 6/24/2014 9.D. Additionally, excavated material. above and beyond that provided to the US 41 project. may be removed from the development and transported to adjacent and nearby developments (within a radius often miles). It is anticipated that a minimum of 400.000 cubic vards of fill will be provided to the US 41 project. Therefore. the maximum amount of fill transported offsite to adjacent and nearby developments shall be limited to a maximum of 650.000 cubic vards. The total amount of excavated material removed from the development shall not exceed 1.050.000 cubic vards. Hours of operation for truck hauling shall be limited to 8 AM to 5 PM. Mondav- Friday. Excavation hours shall be limited to 7 AM to 5 PM. Monday- Friday. Rock crushing shall only occur between 8 AM and 5 PM. Monday-Friday. Blasting shall only occur between 9 AM and 4 PM, Monday- Friday. A secondary access point for resident a shall be provided off of Greenway Road prior to export of excavation materials. F. The maximum number of fill truck trips shall not exceed 140 exiting trips per day. G. Prior to commencement of off -site removal of fill. the Develoner will improve Greenwa Road by providing a 24 -foot wide (paved and stabilized) roadway. Within 60 days of completion of the excavation activities and associated export of surplus embankment material. the Developer shall restore the 24 -foot wide paved area and restripe in accordance with Collier Countv Transportation Department direction. H. Off- -site removal of fill shall be completed within two vears of approval of the commercial excavation permit. The Developer may request an extension of up to one year, beyond this two year period. from the Collier County Planning Commission. In anv event. the excavation shall terminate no later than 3 years after the approval of this PUD Amendment. Page 12 of 15 Words underlined are added, words stniek thfauRb are deleted HA 201 CCPC\Naples Reserve RPUD (]'UDA -PL- 2014 - 0342) 6 -5 -14 docx Packet Page -204- by the board. When is te reeemmendation and appfeved a request Fnade Femave surplus Plaffliilie C " y Additionally, excavated material. above and beyond that provided to the US 41 project. may be removed from the development and transported to adjacent and nearby developments (within a radius often miles). It is anticipated that a minimum of 400.000 cubic vards of fill will be provided to the US 41 project. Therefore. the maximum amount of fill transported offsite to adjacent and nearby developments shall be limited to a maximum of 650.000 cubic vards. The total amount of excavated material removed from the development shall not exceed 1.050.000 cubic vards. Hours of operation for truck hauling shall be limited to 8 AM to 5 PM. Mondav- Friday. Excavation hours shall be limited to 7 AM to 5 PM. Monday- Friday. Rock crushing shall only occur between 8 AM and 5 PM. Monday-Friday. Blasting shall only occur between 9 AM and 4 PM, Monday- Friday. A secondary access point for resident a shall be provided off of Greenway Road prior to export of excavation materials. F. The maximum number of fill truck trips shall not exceed 140 exiting trips per day. G. Prior to commencement of off -site removal of fill. the Develoner will improve Greenwa Road by providing a 24 -foot wide (paved and stabilized) roadway. Within 60 days of completion of the excavation activities and associated export of surplus embankment material. the Developer shall restore the 24 -foot wide paved area and restripe in accordance with Collier Countv Transportation Department direction. H. Off- -site removal of fill shall be completed within two vears of approval of the commercial excavation permit. The Developer may request an extension of up to one year, beyond this two year period. from the Collier County Planning Commission. In anv event. the excavation shall terminate no later than 3 years after the approval of this PUD Amendment. Page 12 of 15 Words underlined are added, words stniek thfauRb are deleted HA 201 CCPC\Naples Reserve RPUD (]'UDA -PL- 2014 - 0342) 6 -5 -14 docx Packet Page -204- 6/24/2014 9.D. 1. There shall be no stacking of excavation- related vehicles including haul trucks on Greenway Road. The minimum distance to the rock crushing location shall be 2.000 feet from the south PUD boundary, ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this RPUD Maser Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Preserves for the The Naples Reserve RPUD have been platted previously and are depicted on Exhibit C. RPUD Master Plan. and equal 72.6 acres. which exceeds the minimum required 41.1 acres of native vegetation. vegetated — eas __ . stent with the LaHd Use Summary en Exhibit G k]2�4P Mastef Plan-. PLANNING A. A maximum of 1 154 dwelling units are permitted in the PUD. of which 542 units are derived from the allowable base density and 612 are derived from TDR credits. All residential density above the base densitv shall be derived from TDR Credits severed and transferred from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands consistent with the provisions of the Collier Countv Growth Management Plan. in er-def te— i,rere District, quali6zing Sending Lands, &E)m Sendin4 Lands within one mile of the Ufban Are&, Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits. a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted docurnentinu that the developer has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological assiLnment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). B. One entity (hereinafter the Manag =ing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close -out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close -out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SH Naples Reserve, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Page 13 of 15 words underlined are added, words 4Fuc-1; Fkretigh are deleted NA21012\2012103\WNPUDA \Post CCPC \Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA -PL -2014 -0342) 6- 5- 14.doex Packet Page -205- 6/24/2014 9.D Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity. but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD are closed - out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. C. Construction of the clubhouse will commence prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the 231St residential dwelling unit. WATER MANAGEMENT A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall be located outside the boundaries of ZL conservation easements /preserves. B. The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to fully contain the 100 - year /72 -hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.08 cfs /acre and no increase in total volume of discharge. C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD). UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING A. The owner shall reserve four areas to potentially be dedicated to the Collier County Water -Sewer District for raw water well easements with dimensions of 100 -foot by 100 - foot each, alone with utility /access easements that shall be 20 feet wide, or less if the well site is contiguous to a public right -of =way. The approximate locations of these four proposed easements are depicted on the proposed Master Plan. One of these four wells may be used as a test well and converted to a production well. The test well will not be converted into a production well until the water management lakes proposed near the test well are constructed in accordance with the 50 foot setback standard. No additional production wells will be installed until the project's water management lakes have been constructed or the year 2027, whichever is earlier. Upon request of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the owner shall convey to the Collier County Water -Sewer District the requested utility /access easements and raw water well easements within 60 days, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The Collier County Water -Sewer District shall pay the owner $15,930 per acre for those easements that are conveyed or dedicated to the Collier County Water -Sewer District. If all or some of the conveyances have not been requested by the Collier County Water - Sewer District at the earlier of Site Development Plan ( "SDP ") and/or final construction plans and plat ("PPL ") approval or within six years approval of this Ordinance, then the reserved areas shall be deemed released. Page 14 of 15 Words underlined are added, &cards stc- tlrfflttala are deleted I-1 v2012L0121031WPTUDA\Post CCPC \Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA -PL- 2014 -0342) 5- 5- 14,docx Packet Page -206- 6/24/2014 9.D. At the time of the SDP and /or PPL submittal, the owner shall show the well site reservations applicable to the area within the SDP and /or plat. During the review of the SDP and /or PPI., the Collier County Water -Sewer District shall decide at that time whether it will request the dedication of the utility /access easement. Failure to request the utility /access easement shall be deemed a release of the utility /access easement and the final SDP and /or PPL shall be approved without the utility /access easement. B. The developer will provide an 8" potable water main interconnection stub -out intended to serve as a potable water interconnect to the Winding_ Cypress PUD. as requested on behalf of the Collier Countv Water and Sewer District. The general location of the interconnect is shown conceptually on the RPUD Master Plan, and the location can be ehanaed administratively. without a formal PUD amendment at the discretion of the County. the Collier County Water and Sewer District. and the developer. The water main stub -out from the Naples Reserve PUD will terminate at the easterly boundary of the roadway reservation in the location �e�, nerally depicted on the RPUD Master Plan. The water main interconnect stub -out plans, and details will be submitted to Collier County at the time of the submittal of the construction plans and plat for the parcel adjacent to the proposed location for final approval. The interconnect stub -out will be constructed as part of the construction plans and plat improvements associated with the development parcel adjacent to the interconnect stub -out location shown on the RPUD Master Plan. Page 15of15 Words underlined are added, words 5ta+ek- � are deleted HAA2012\2012103\WP \PUDA \Post CCPC \Naples Reserve RPUD (PtJDA -PL -2014 -0342) 6- - 14.docx Packet Page -207- ryv V, J N � W ORDINANCE NO. 07_ 71 N cp AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY v COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, row \\�9z'4 AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS bi ELZV AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD BY ADDING 602 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, FOR A TOTAL OF 1154 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF US 41 AND 1 1/2 MILES EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 688+/ - ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-42, THE FORMER NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 6/24/2014 9.D. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 99 -42 establishing the Naples Reserve Golf Club PUD; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 04 -219, the Board of County Commissioners extended the PUD approval affecting Ordinance No. 99-42 until June 8, 2008; and WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., representing Anthony Salce of Gulf Coast Development Group, LC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for the project known as Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD in accordance with the Exhibits attached hereto as Exhibits A through F. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. Page 1 of 2 Packet Page -208- 6/24/2014 9.D. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Nurnber 99-42, known as the Naples Reserve Golf Club PUD, adopted on June 8, 1999, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this t3 day of Noti t. i0 r , 2007. Et'ri'i .1GHT I~ V9 yCK, CLERK Attest .,ts` t0 �'�uty Clerk i ig1A$}t.L1'E on l � Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER By: JA S COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Marjorg (� M. Student - Stirling Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A —List of Allowable Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Table Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E — List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F — Development Commitments This ordinance filed with the gory of State's Offic the L(3?' 'day 0f0 r and ocknowledg rn t cj that filin .i thi day of By oarwn, rk Page 2 of 2 Packet Page -209- 6/24/2014 9.D. A -1 Packet Page -210- EXHINT A Table I PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TYPE UNITS/FT. ACREAGE± TRACT "RG" RESIDENTIAL 1154 609.2 TRACT "RA" RECREATION AREA 0 15.2 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 63.7 I TRACT RG PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Single - family detached dwellings; 2) Single - family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 3) Villa/patio dwellings (detached single- family dwellings of a smaller scale than the typical single - family detached dwelling); 4) Multi- family dwellings; 5) Model homes; 6) Golf courses and related facilities; 7) Commercial excavations — surplus fill material generated by commercial excavation depths may be transported off -site only for use in the US-41 improvement project associated with this zoning approval; $). Project sales, construction and administrative offices, which may occur in Yesidential, and/or in temporary. 9) Any%ther principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of 'permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (" 3ZA ") by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). A -1 Packet Page -210- 6/24/2014 9.D. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to, private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures, gatchouses, and other outdoor recreation facilities; 2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections. II TRACT RA PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development: 1) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private, intended for use by the residents and their guest only). 2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playground improvements /facilities, and passive and/or active water features. 3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (`BZA') by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses or strictures incidental to recreation areas and, or facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance, storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping. III DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Development of The Naples Reserve RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. A -2 Packet Page -211- 6/24/2014 9.D. Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. There shall be no more than 1154 residential dwelling units permitted which provides for a maximum gross density of 1.67 dwelling units pre acre. A minimum of 612 Transfer of Development Rights Credits shall be obtained to achieve the maximum gross density. B. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Residential PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. W SIGNS For the purposes of this RPUD, the LDC provisions from Section 5.06.02.A.6. are applicable for off - premise signage. A -3 Packet Page -212- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT B TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS .'DEVELOPMENT sm000S ; z.K FA 1L'Y SINdit FAMILY. ` PATlO HOME IVfULT{» DETSiIEC ATTACD, . `' &VILLAS F/1MILY. RECREATION' MINIMUM LOT AREA 2,250 S.F. PER TOWNHOUSE 2,250 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER SUltDINGS,.` ... ?,INIRAC STIUGTJE MINIMUM LOT AREA 2,250 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER 10,000 S.F. SIDE UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT 'h BH MAXIMUM LOT AREA 1 Acre N/A N/A N/A N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F. /D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET N/A MIN SIDE YARD 6 FEET 0 FEET or 3 FEET or GREATER OF 10 N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 6 FEET 9 FEET FEET OR 1h BH 40 FEET MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET N/A MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET GREATER OF 20 N/A STRUCTURES FEET OR 1/z THE SUM OF BH MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 40 FEET 35 FEET 65 FEET 50 FEET TO EXCEED ACTUAL ACCESSORY STRUTUIiES FRONT S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. 20 FEET SIDE S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. 'h BH REAR (ATTACHED) 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 10 FEET DETACHED 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET Greater of 15 BETWEEN STRUCTURES feet or 1/z BH MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET TO EXCEED S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height — unless otherwise noted, all building heights shall be "zoned" building heights, as defined in the LDC. C Packet Page -213- Notes: areoM" UNE 6/24/2014 9.D. 1) No structures are permitted in the required 20 -foot lake maintenance easement No setback is required for structures adjacent to a lake maintenance easement. 2) Side yards — No side yard shall be required between units when more than one residential unit is in a single structure (i.e.: attached single - family and townhomes). Varying side yards are provided to allow side entry garages and to maintain the required separation between buildings. 3) The IDC standards for cluster residential design, as set forth in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, shall apply to residential land uses within this RPUD. 4) Terraced setbacks are permitted for either two or three story multi- family structures. Setbacks shall be measured from that ground floor exterior wall of lesser height as long as a minimum 15 foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 5) Entrance features (i.e.: monumentation, clock towers and colonnades) shall be limited in height to no greater than 50 feet which may be located at the project entrance. b) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side load garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth nwst be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to avoid vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. a � I I W.uio Figure 1 Packet Page -214- IFO-11 F-5 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN Packet Page -215- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT D Legal Descriptlon All of Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida Packet Page -216- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.(0), for "cul -de -sac and local streets, and LDC Appendix B, Typical Street Section, B -2 and B -3, and Section III, Exhibit "A", Design Requirements for Subdivisions C.13.e. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance No. 2004 -66 that requires 60 feet, to allow 50 feet. A 50 -foot right -of -way is permitted in this RPUD to provide for flexibility in development design, subject to providing easements for required utilities generally parallel to the right -of -way. This is a reasonable deviation that has been implemented in subdivisions throughout the County, and does not compromise health, safety, and welfare issues related to civil engineering design. All platted project streets shall have a minimum 50 -foot right -of -way. Deviation 1 from Sub - section 6.06.01(0) of the LDC, for cul -de -sac and local streets, and LDC Appendix B -2 and B -3 for cul- de-sac and local streets respectively, and Section III, Exhibit "A ", Design Requirements for Subdivisions C. 13.e. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance No. 2004 -66 which requires 60 feet to allow 50 feet. (See Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan). These streets shall be private, and shall be classified as local streets. Deviation #2 seeks relief from Section III, Exhibit "A ", Design Requirements of Subdivisions C.13 j. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance Number 2004 -66, that requires tangents to be provided between reverse curves on all streets. This RPUD will not require tangents between reverse curves in order to provide greater subdivision design flexibility. All internal roads within the RPUD will be private, and have low posted speed limits, and will have a curvilinear design that has been shown to act as traffic calming measures by reducing local traffic speeds. Additionally, the flat terrain found on site does not warrant the need for tangents. This is a reasonable deviation that has been applied throughout the County, and does not comprise a risk to public health, safety and welfare. Tangents between reverse curves are not required for any local street design in this RPUD. Deviation 2 from Section III, Exhibit "A ", Design Requirements for Subdivisions C.13 j. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance No. 2004 -66. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c., that functionally limits the number of model homes to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the project. In an effort to provide a variety of residence styles and floor plans within the development, it is essential not to arbitrarily limit the opportunity of a home buyer to see the creativity of the architecture proposed in a development. To do so could result in monotonous tract housing reminiscent of the "new town" movement after the end of the World War U. This deviation is appropriate, and does not negatively affect the health and safety, nor welfare of the future residents of the development. The Naples Reserve RPUD may have one model home representing each type of residential product. The number of model homes may exceed five, but shall not exceed a total of ten. Deviation 3 from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c. that limits the total number of model homes in a single development to five. E -1 Packet Page -217- 6/24/2014 9.D. Deviation #4 seeks relief from Section III, Exhibit "A ", Design Requirements of Subdivisions C. 13.f of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted through Ordinance Number 200466, limits cul-de -sac lengths to 1000 feet or less. This RPUD may have cul -de -sacs with lengths greater than 1000 feet. The RPUD lands are relatively without topographic relief, so greater sight distances would allow longer dead -end streets without jeopardizing the safety of the future residents. Further, the turning radii of the terminal cul-de -sacs will meet or exceed applicable County and National Fire Protection Association requirements. Cul -de -sac lengths in the Naples Reserve RPUD may exceed 1000 feet. E -2 Packet Page -218- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS TRANSPORTATION The development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement marking, and design criteria shall be in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. B. Access Points shown on the RPUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property boundary. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is approved. C. Site- related improvements (as opposed to system - related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to commencement of on -site construction. D. Nothing in any development order (DO) shall vest a right of access in excess of a right- inhight- out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress, or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title, or assignee. Collier County reserves the right to close any median opening existing at any time which is found to be adverse to the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. E. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County rights -of -way or easement(s), then compensating right -of -way shall be provided at no cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement(s) upon final approval of the turn lane design during the first subsequent development order (i.e.: site development plan/subdivision plat). The typical cross - section may not differ from the existing roadway unless approved, in writing, by the Transportation Division Administrator, or his designee. F. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, traffic signal(s), other traffic control device, sign, pavement marking improvement within a public right -of -way or easement, or site - related improvements (as opposed to system related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be the responsibility of the developer, its successors or assigns. The improvements shall be paid for or installed, at the County's discretion, prior to the issuance of the first CO. F -1 Packet Page -219- 6/24/2014 9.D. G. The RPUD Master Plan reflects a 100' wide reservation for dedication along the western boundary of the RPUD. Should the County find that it is appropriate to improve that corridor, the Developer, its successor, or assigns shall agree to be a part of a joint permit application with Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing conservation easement. All costs associated with the potential conservation easement modification, including any required mitigation shall be the responsibility of the County. The 100' reservation shall be dedicated to the County at no cost, and in fee simple title within 180 days of the County's request. The developer shall provide a storm water management system within the RPUD boundary for treatment/retention of storm water from the 100 foot reservation area. UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The developer shall reserve four areas to be dedicated to Collier County Water & Sewer District for raw water well easements with dimensions 100 -foot by 100 -foot each, and utility /access easements that shall be 20 feet wide unless the well site is contiguous to a public right of way. The approximate locations of these proposed easements are depicted on the RPUD Master Plan. The dedication shall occur at the time of site development plan, or final plat approval for the area within the development phase that contains the respective well sites. At the time of the SDP and/or plat submittal, the developer shall provide the well site easements that meet the standard setback requirements for water wells. If the surface water management lakes for the subdivision are installed prior to the installation of production wells for the SERWTP Wellfield, anticipated for 2012, a setback of 50 feet shall be required. If the surface water management lakes are installed after the production wells a 300 -foot setback shall be required. The County has further requested a test well at one of the proposed well sites. The County agrees that the desired test well will not be converted into a production well until the water management lake proposed near the test well is constructed in accordance with the 50 foot setback standard. No additional production wells will be installed until the project's water management lakes have been constructed or the year 2012, whichever is earlier. ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this RPLJD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The Naples Reserve RPUD shall preserve 63.7 acres of vegetated areas consistent with the Land Use Summary on the RPUD Master Plan. F -2 Packet Page -220- 6/24/2014 9-D. PLANNING A. One TDR credit shall be required for every five (5) gross acres of RFMUD land area utilized as part of the golf course, including the clubhouse area, rough, fairways, greens, and lakes, but excluding any area dedicated as conservation that is non - irrigated and retained in a natural state. B. In order to increase residential density above the base density allowed in the Urban -Mixed Use District, Residential Fringe Subdistrict and the Agricultural/Rural - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands, 612 TDR Credits shall be severed from qualifying Sending Lands, of which a minimum of 311 TDR Credits shall be severed from Sending Lands within one mile of the Urban Area. C. Collier County and the Developer of the Naples Reserve RPUD have cooperated to address affordable housing impacts associated with the Naples Reserve RPUD. The following financial contribution shall be paid by the developer, or its successors and assigns, to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund. One thousand dollars ($1,000) per residential dwelling unit constructed within the project shall be paid to Collier County within 7 days of the closing on each residential dwelling unit. The amount set forth herein shall be reduced by any amounts paid by the developer on behalf of Habitat for Humanity's pursuant to the Developer Contribution Agreement US 41 Developers Consortium (DCA) to fund the shortfall after Habitat for Humanity's road impact fees are applied pursuant to the DCA, . The payment of the sums set forth in this Section shall reflect a credit to the project's obligations to pay any fees that may be adopted in the future by the County relating to the provision of affordable or workforce housing. WATER N'IANAGENIENT A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall be located outside the boundaries of conservation easements/preserves. B. The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to fully contain the 100- year /72- hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.10 cfs/acre and no increase in total volume of discharge. C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD). PARKS AND RECREATION The County and the developer will use their best efforts to determine with the US Army Corps of Engineers the correct acreage for mitigation set forth in Permit Number 199900619(IP -SB) so as to be able to remove the approximate 20 acres not needed for the mitigation area from this permit. The referenced Corps permit will not be modified to exclude the surplus off -site mitigation acreage. This area shall be conveyed to Collier County in fee simple for a County park This conveyance shall be made to the County upon satisfactory resolution of the Corps off -site mitigation acreage issue. F -3 Packet Page -221- STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2007 -71 6/24/2014 9.D. Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 13th day of November, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 19th day of November, 2007. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and.Clerk Ex- officio to Board of County Commissioners By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Packet Page -222- 4 i ORDINANCE NO. 12 - 2 9 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07 -71, THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD), TO REMOVE A GOLF COURSE FROM THE RPUbc -- PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO PERMITTED USIFSZ,F PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT: STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO MAST;` PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO LIST Q' REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC; PROVIDING FPWI AMENDMENTS TO LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMEN') ' AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SUBJECT PROPER IS LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF US 41 AND 1 -1/2 MILS EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP Sl SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 688 + /- ACRES. 6/24/2014 9.D. r141 C- r- c.� 0 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 07 -71, which established the Naples Reserve Golf Club Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD); and WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau, AICP, of RWA, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing SFI Naples Reserve, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance 07 -71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that: SECTION I: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT A, LIST OF ALLOWABLE USES, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07 -71, NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD The List of Allowable uses. previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 07 -71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit A, List of Allowable Uses. attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Naples Reserve / PL2011 -1168 Page 1 of) Rev. 4/20/12 Words � #r-oiji!h . .... ..I- - ,nderlined are added.. Packet Page -223- 6/24/2014 9.D. SECTION 11: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT B, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71, NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD The Development Standards Table, previously attached as Exhibit B to Ordinance Number 07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit B, Development Standards, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT C, MASTER PLAN, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71, NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD The Master Plan, previously attached as Exhibit C to Ordinance Number 07 -71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit C, Master Plan, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION IV: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT E. LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71.. NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD The List of Requested Deviations from LDC, previously attached as Exhibit E to Ordinance Number 07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations from LDC, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION V: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT F, LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS, OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-71, NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RPUD The List of Developer Commitments, previously attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance Number 07-71, the Naples Reserve Golf Club RPUD, is hereby amended and replaced with a new Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. I SECTION VI: EFFECTIVE DATE Except as amended herein, the remaining provisions within Collier County Ordinance No. 07-71 remain in full force and effect. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Naples Reserve / PL2011-1168 Pate 21 of 3 Rev. 4/20/12 Words str-uek fliFaugh art- A,-1,-t,,& 1-n-4c inderlMed are added, Packet Page -224- 6/24/2014 9.D. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this A2"d'ay of 2012. ATTFSV­ " DtVT6lTT­ff.'B1ZK'K, CLERK 1�: D n uty/Cl k Approved as to form ' Ck and legal sufficiency: even T. Williams '5 l(,' C Assistant County Attorney qJ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Bv: FRED COYLE, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A — List of Allowable Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit E — List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F — List of'Developer Commitments I I - CPS -011 15/ 18 This ordinonce filed with the Secretory of r, -te Office the 1�cy Of ' and cckno wle _- dopment of 1hat --�' td h- C; cy filin. rece! U A, , -�- y De"Uty q4841k Naples Reserve / PL2011-1168 Page 3 of 3 Rev. 4/20/12 Words StRiEk ihrOU inderlined are added. Packet Page -225- 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT A PRO.) CT LAI D L'SE TRACTS TYPE UNITS /FT. ACREAGE+ TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1 154 592.8 TRACT "RA" RECREATION AREA 0 31.6 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 63.7 TOTAL: 688.1 I TRACT R PERMITTED USES: No building or structure. or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used. or land used. in whole or in part. f'or other than the following *: A. Principal Uses: 1) Single - family detached dwellings, 2) Single- family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence). 3) Villa patio dwellings (detached single- family dwellings of a smaller scale than the typical single - family detached dwelling); 4) Multi - family dwellings: 5) Model homes; 6) Commercial excavations for all lakes identified as "L" on Exhibit C — RPUD Master Plan (subject to Exhibit F: List of Developer Commitments. Transportation Item D); 7) Project sales. construction and administrative offices, v :high may occur in residential, and /or in temporary structures. 8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of P. rmitted principal uses. as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Naples Reserve PL- 20110001168 Packet Page -226- 06`0712012 paize I of 1I 6/24/2014 9.D. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to, private (Yarages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures, gatehouses, and other outdoor recreation facilities; 2) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections. 11 TRACT RA PERMITTED USES: No building or structure. or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part.. for other than the following: A. Principal Uses Typically Accessory to Residential Development: 1) Structures intended to provide social and recreational space (private, intended for use by the residents and their guest only); 2) Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts. playground improvements /facilities. and passive and /or active water features. 3) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses. as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: I ) Customary accessory uses or structures incidental to recreation areas and. or facilities, including structures constructed for purposes of maintenance. storage or shelter with appropriate screening and landscaping. Naples Reserve PL-20110001169 Packet Page -227- 0607/2012 Pace 2 of 11 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of The Naples Reserve RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order. such as, but not limited to, subdivision plat, site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Residential PUD Residential Subdistrict (Tract "R " ). Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. DIAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 1 154 residential dwelling units permitted which provides for a maximum -rocs density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre. A minimum of 612 Transfer of Development Rights Credits shall be obtained to achieve the maximum gross density, SIGNS For the purposes of this RPUD, the LDC provisions from Section 5.06.02.13.6. are applicable for off - premise signage. Please see Deviation #2 in Exhibit E. This off -site signage opportunity may, only be implemented after such signage is allowed in the Walnut Lakes PUD. Naples Reserve PI-20110001168 Packet Page -228- 06,`07;2012 Pare 3 of I 6/24/2014 9.D. TABLE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY PATIO HOME MULTI- CLUBHOUSE/ MINIMUM LOT AREA DETACHED ATTACHED & & VILLAS FAMILY RECREATION SIDE UNIT TOWNHOUSE UNIT UNIT BUILDINGS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 6,000 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER 5,000 S.F. PER 2,250 S.F. PER 10,000 S.F. SIDE UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT V2 BH MAXIMUM LOT AREA 1 Acre N/A N/A N/A N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F 1,000 S.F. /D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD 20 FEET* 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET* 25 FEET MIN SIDE YARD 6 FEET 0 FEET or 3 FEET or GREATER OF 10 GREATER OF 6 FEET 9 FEET** FEET OR 1/2 BH 15 FEET OR 1/ BH, MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET GREATER OF 15 FEET OR 11-2 BH MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET GREATER OF 20 GREATER OF 15 STRUCTURES FEET OR 1/2 THE FEET OR' /z BH SUM OF BH MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 35 FEET 4=FEET 35 FEET 55 FEET 50 FEET TO EXCEED (ZONED) MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT 45 FEET 50 45 FEET 65 FEET 60 FEET TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT S.P.S. S.P.S, S.P.S. S.P.S. 20 FEET SIDE S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.$. V2 BH REAR (ATTACHED) (DETACHED) 5 FEET 20 FEET 5 FEET 20 FEET 5 FEET 20 FEET 5 FEET 20 FEET 10 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 12 FEET 12 FEET 12 FEET —12 FEET Greater of 15 feet or' /_: BH MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED (ZONED) 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 40 FEET MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT L.TO EXCEED (ACTUAL) 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 50 FEET S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height — unless otherwise noted, all building heights shall be "zoned" building heights, as defined in the LDC. *: Residences x ith side loaded garages may have a minimum 15 foot front yard * *. A three (3 ') foot setback shall be permitted only where nine (9') feet is provided on the adjacent lot. Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 Packet Page -229- 06:07/2012 Paae 4 of 11 6/24/2014 9.D. ?votes: I } No structures are permitted in the required 20 -foot lake maintenance easement. No setback is required for structures adjacent to a lake maintenance easement. �) Side yards — No side yard shall be required between units internal to a structure, when more than one residential unit is in a single structure (i.e.: attached single - family and townhomes). Varying side yards are provided to allow side entry garages and to maintain the required separation between buildings. 3 j Terraced setbacks are permitted for either two or three story multi - family structures, Setbacks shall be measured from that ground floor exterior wall of lesser height as long as a minimum IS foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure i below. 4) Entrance features (i.e.: monuments, clock towers and colonnades) may be located at the project entrance and shall be limited to a maximum height of SO feet. Si For all residential units, garages must be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk located in the street rights -of -way closest to the garage, except for side load garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to avoid vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. Naples Reserve PI-20110001168 a0 " Packet Page -230- 06%0712012 Paae 5 of i I 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN 4e f � > ,••• � �� "`.', 1 .-tee- � ;���- '.� Ip I .- �I'= '!-mfr l" z +l /• ` 1 �1�~'� t......_.r � r ;rA$. 1 t D 1 �t f ` $ � ',.x- � 1 s >~ • �� - _'- -a t'f�n �� � �.✓'y � .711 z+ rr 4 � _ - x ? t %���ks ��.• -' .F :� �. � 4� ifs �� i. w r Naples Reserve PI. -201 1000) 168 r z z L 1 \ J T 7 E I 3 - S - j Y _ Naples Reserve PI. -201 1000) 168 Packet Page -231- 06'0712012 Pane 6 of I I r z z L \ s ttC � T Packet Page -231- 06'0712012 Pane 6 of I I EXHIBIT D Legal Description All of Section 1. Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 Packet Page -232- 6/24/2014 9.D. 061072012 Pa--e 7 of I 1 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c., that limits the number of model homes to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of fifteen. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 13.6. that allows ground/residential entrance signage only on -site within residential zoning districts. to allow ground/residential entrance signage outside of the residential zoning district that the signage will serve. This off -site ground/residential entrance signage shall be permitted in close proximity to the US41 Right -of -Way within the Walnut Lakes PUD. This deviation may only be implemented upon such signage being allowed by the Walnut Lakes PUD. Naples Reserve PL- 20110001168 Packet Page -233- 06/07/2012 Page 8 of 11 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS TRANSPORTATION The development of this RPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The RPUD Master Plan reflects a 100' wide reservation for dedication along the western boundary of the RPUD. Should the County find that it is appropriate to improve that corridor, the Developer. its successor, or assigns shall agree to be a part of a joint permit application with Collier County for the specific purpose of modifying the existing conservation easement. All costs associated with the potential conservation easement modification, including any required mitigation shall be the responsibility of the County. The 100' reservation shall be dedicated to the County at no cost, and in fee simple title within 180 days of the County's request. The developer shall provide a storm water management system within the RPUD boundary for treatment /retention of storm water from the 100 foot reservation area. B. The Developer agrees to provide mitigation for traffic impacts as detailed in the companion Developer's Contribution Agreement [DCA] in order to provide consistency with policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan.'' The DCA provides for improvements to the intersection of US -41 and Collier Boulevard, and/or US -41 east of Collier Boulevard. C. If warranted and approved by the County, the developer shall be responsible for the proportionate fair share cost of a traffic signal, or turn lane extension/expansion, at the intersection of Naples Reserve Boulevard and US41 Tamiami 'Frail. If Naples Reserve Boulevard should become a Public Roadway in the future, then the proportionate share requirement shall apply to this development's entrance where it intersects with Naples Reserve Boulevard. Upon completion of the installation, inspection, burn -in period and final approval /acceptance of traffic si mal at either location mentioned in the previous paragraph, ownership and maintenance of the signal shall be turned over to Collier County. Any negotiations relevant to fair share payments or reimbursements from any and all other neighboring developers /property owners that directly benefit from said traffic signal, will be determined based upon the percentage of usage /impact." D. Excavated material in an amount up to ten percent (to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards) of the total volume excavated may be removed from the development with no prohibition as to the destination of the material. Excavated material in excess of up to ten percent (to a maximum of 20.000 cubic yards) of the total volurne excavated. may be removed from the development and be transported off -site only for use in the US -41 roadway �,videning project from the intersection, of US 41 and Collier Boulevard to the intersection of US 41 and CR 92, and subject to the excavation provisions from the Code of Ordinances as may be amended, however the followin( paragraph will continue to apply: "Issuance of commercial excavation permits. Applications for commercial excavation permits shalt be reviewed by the community development and environmental services administrator, or his designee, and by the environmental advisory council for recommendation and approved by the board. ''hen a request is made to remove surplus fill material from a previously approved development excavation, the requirement for review by the environmental advisory council shall be waved, but dependent on haul route and amount of till to be hauled, stab may require approval by Collier County Planning Commission." E. At project buildout, a secondary access point for resident use shall be provided off of Greenwav Road. Naples Reserve PL- 201 10001 168 Packet Page -234- 06,07r`20 12 Page 9 of 11 6/24/2014 9.D. ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The Naples Reserve RPUD shall preserve 63.7 acres of vegetated areas consistent with the Land Use Summary on Exhibit C RPUD Master Plan. PLANNING A. fn order to increase residential density above the base density allowed in the Urban -Mixed Use District, Residential Fringe Subdistrict and the Agricultural /Rural - Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands, 612 TDR Credits shall be severed from qualifj,ing Sending Lands, of which a minimum of 311 TDR Credits shall be severed from Sending Lands within one mile of the Urban Area. B. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close -out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is SFI Naples Reserve, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for ]ca al sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County, that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD are closed -out. then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. C. Construction of the clubhouse will commence prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the 231" residential dwelling unit. WATER MANAGEMENT A. Constructed drainage facilities and structures shall be located outside the boundaries of conservation easements /preserves. B. The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to fully contain the 100- year /72- hour design storm event with a regulated discharge rate not to exceed 0.08 cfs /acre and no increase in total volume of discharge. C. All elevations shall be based on the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD). EJTILITIES AND ENGINEERING A. The owner shall reserve four areas to potentially be dedicated to the Collier County Water - Sewer District for raw water well easements with dimensions of 100 -foot by 100 -foot each, atom with utility /access easements that shall be 2'0 feet wide, or less if the well site is contiguous to a public right -of -way. The approximate locations of these four proposed ea- cements are depicted on the Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 Packet Page -23S- 06/07.'2012 Page 10 of I I 6/24/2014 9.D. proposed Master Plan. One of these four wells may be used as a test well and converted to a production well. The test well will not be converted into a production well until the water management lakes proposed near the test well are constructed in accordance with the 50 foot setback standard. No additional production wells will be installed until the project's water management lakes have been constructed or the year 2027, whichever is earlier. Upon request of the Collier County Water- Sewer District, the owner shall convey to the Collier County Water- Sewer District the requested utility/access easements and raw water well easements within 60 days, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The Collier Counri- Water- Sewer District shall pay the owner $15,930 per acre for those easements that are conveyed or dedicated to the Collier County Water- Sewer District. If all or some of the conveyances have not been requested by the Collier County Water- Sewer District at the earlier of Site Development Plan ( "SDP ") and/or final construction plans and plat ('-PPL ") approval or within six years of approval of this Ordinance, then the reserved areas shall be deemed released. At the time of the SDP and/or PPL submittal, the owner shall show the well site reservations applicable to the area within the SDP and/or plat. During the review of the SDP and/or PPL, the Collier County Water- Sewer District shall decide at that time whether it will request the dedication of the utility /access easement. Failure to request the utility /access easement shall be deemed a release of the utility /access easement and the final SDP and/or PPL shall be approved without the utility /access easement. Naples Reserve PL-20110001168 Packet Page -236- 06/07,2012 Page I I of t 1 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2012-29 6/24/2014 9.D. which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th day of July, 2012, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 26th day of July, 2012. DWIGHT E. Clerk of C_ouri�s.--and 'Cletk Ex-officio -to Bbardof County Commi>e�ronie'rs a. By: Martha Vergara,i Deputy Clerk Packet Page -237- 6/24 < i < i < Q /2014 9.D. n Q CD Z Z O N 3n05 01 ION / 7 ow Wit W � O O � O � J 0 s� �� SV C ¢ 99 z rya v� plc Srco ibE FUv �� ZG �P � G Oddh31�OB tl31T00 � �u� Sa � aavn�noe a3mo� ci � e foss d's1 Packet Page - 238 - U 0- Q Z O Q U O J it N 4t W I— H W a N /Aff � � Q O ut i w ° O CPC i 6 � J J 01 ION / 7 ow Wit W � O O � O � J 0 s� �� SV C ¢ 99 z rya v� plc Srco ibE FUv �� ZG �P � G Oddh31�OB tl31T00 � �u� Sa � aavn�noe a3mo� ci � e foss d's1 Packet Page - 238 - U 0- Q Z O Q U O J it N 4t W I— H W a 0- Q Z O Q U O J it N 4t W I— H W a 6/24/2014 9.D. EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN A, AGRICULTURE POTENTIAL PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST -NORTH UNE l FUTURE ACCESS I OF SECTION 1 35 snas •z7 ^w z7oe.4z' u / s6s•'sr2z"w ncw.4T w z I 1 \L►% a 7 W IM84v o cwo•er w ymw.s 0. -''Igi R , n`x i,v R R ? r,,' R R T !> I Iu I i./ ; EAST UNE OF 20' MIN. TYPE y r -xUty- SECTION 1 BUFFER fir. r -ty, �. 4 v are i I '. L R m /� R `� I t - -i R a� z ti u i j' �4a I R `� ?" I _ - R �) a A, AGRICULTURE R x = "� ` AGRICULTURAL (ft 4 R II cia., Tt,.`T� R r a,ti��i*. R --4l 8" POTABLE WATER MNIt , a rMr�. akav ! :; ^ R x INTERCONNECT sere -QUT S� - - �, ".;i R % R R i 1 (SEE UTIUTY COMMITM ENT tlx y,� 1. pit a S, IN EXHIBIT 'F OF THE ��iflflfl J , ti 1 a a4' r!t t� ptt RPUD ORDINANCE EXHIBIT) `�.'� R �',.• t k'+'�` ' �' n 1� / d '1 5 � �YT� r I t r ' tm' ResnvAnaN r EXISTING 60 ROM EASEMENT 4�4�, PER O.R. 2463 PG. 1381 POTENTIAL FUTURE �^a (. a R (MAY BE VACATED, SEE NOTE 7) iT GATED ACCESS i i -,I R ayT r' 4 R ..p 1 \ d Ft J� (MAY BE 1 3`A' inti"`ji PF : ��� ♦ p` �\ R - RELavATED) I / F�tl,- �i"��' r �� ♦ aa 4'n s.` �.a, '' iU'-R"^i ±rl R R I `t 20' MIN. TYPE 'D` BUFFER I ♦ k^s, „ 1i "LAr'4 M' �' ''a `' p ;,A`7 it`{n .%� + LU 124, COERICOUN'fY (3a.�,;! R ��♦ . ir•'ae'he+ F1��. `! {.t. WELL EASEMENT ♦. {..J� P� \ r. x �t R Fu x 't k n v I e1 iIy / r, I Sri—. _._._EtISi1NO M L �. ` PRESERVE TkACT in t ��� ��i1i �1 s Yxi-� t' R rin R 1 �s}5 b'r 'fi - POTENTPAI PjiESirR'VE.� / i N �1 T ) '°n a w^ k tx Y'' i� Fj I r _u.. �, R UNFROCK @QSINOARY SSE, ROM �� t T Tt:ulsPORTAnoN T Ii` x aS�n1s itii "t 6i�, t,0 I COMMITMENT ' A IN Ct I� EXtj181T 'I' QF �� R '-S1tI �,��`� 1 - -. _. L�tt I THE RPUO R t t t. > .A t �di s 1 F tX 1 Ce t+ x 111 �e .liila �; oe f 'E�xtDiie y �t 1` r"ii Rte\ R R ki ^C RA I P RA fL s. RA ❑ d h. '� „ ". I r �: h & r `'�`. 1`k..Y,� f L R a. ,t r COLLIER COUNTY WELL EASEMENT R; EXISTING CONSSZVATION I� ti t..'"'tI „y ��•I • Pr R . R FASEMFNT PER O.R. BOOK 1 t J ' /�- PRESERVE TRAGT' - `" R I 3142 PAGES 273-29{ !/ r1 R i I . J 1 k 1 £XISIIN V E N ,PEP, I� �. ' R A NEST UNE EASEMENT. PEF -294. L OF SECTION) 4­, t J r. 80Wf 5,112 ,PAGES 273- 294_., 3» p s R i I I �'I,r.POTENTIAL PRESERVE 4BOUNDAWT. R _ - I FUTURE. POTENTIAL ♦ w SEE TRANSPQRTATWN .. . . -IDO'X700» R EI05TING 60' ROAD EASEMENT R y ,' GATED FUTURE AGCE55-_ e _I ACCESS t t -- COMM7'MENT:A' IN EXHIBIT 'F' . , i COLLIER COUNTY PER O.R. 2463 AG 1381 T 2 i t CE MI ENT, tXiOINANCE EXr.€S. "( WELL. EASEMENT (MAY BE VACATED, EE 1381 7) - r - (MAY BE ...... — L �. 1_y ,.,- ,e - /y, t. RELOCATED) H N1aPtiES RESERVE BLVD. i �oUTH UNE -, sECnoN 1 Yes `3 e s 11 N az ,te.a0 P 110 ACCESS EASEMENT ��y�� 20` MIN. TYPE 100'X100' !' PER Q.R. 2842, PAGE 565 EXISTING 60» ROAD EASEMENT PLD, WALNUT LAKES .. 'D' BUFFER COWER COUNTY PER O.R. 2463 P.G. 1361 PARTIALLY DEVELOPED WELL EASEMENT— (MAY BE VACATED, SEE NOTE 7) Page 7 of 13 Words underlined are added, word steam k diflaugh are deleted H:\2012\2012103 \WP \PUDA\A4inor Resubmittal \Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA -PL- 12014 -0342) 4- 10- 14.doex Packet Page -239- 6/24/2014 9.D. E:1 A ;5 0 3m 9:&E W MET Goo EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN (continued) 36 35 A 2 THE LDC PROVISIONS FROM_] SECTION 5.06.02.8.6 ARE APPLICABLE FOR OFF — PREMISE SIGNAGE JECT MON , Fi. LEGAL DESCRIP110M SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST MD MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. WITHIN THE PUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 607 OF OPEN SPACE IN THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE AND 70X OPEN SPACE IN THE RURAL FRINGE. 2. THE REQUIRED 60% AND 70% OPEN SPACE (SEE CHART BELOW) SHALL BE PROVIDED. 3. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 4. THE DESIGN, LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP APPROVAL OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL 5. THE LAKE AND OPEN SPACE AREAS ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOC SECTION 3.05.07.G.3. 6- THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 41.1 ACRES OF NATIVE PRESERVE WITHIN THE RPUD. 7. SHOULD THE EXISTING 60' WIDE ROADWAY EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARIES BE VACATED OR EXTINGUISHED, THE 20 FOOT WIDE TYPE V BUFFER WILL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. 8. THE PRESERVE SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADD11IONAL PLANTINGS TO SATISFY BOTH LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND NATIVE PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LDC. 31 1 I 1 0, � A LEGEND: EXISTING PRESERVE OLAKE PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY RESERVATION LAM} USE SUMMARY TRACT LAND TRACT "R' TRACT *RA' RESIDENTIAL 5819 31.6 AREA TRACT 'P' PRESERVE TOTAL 68&1 DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY DESCRIPTION DU/AC UNITS MAXIMUM DENS11-Y VVrTH0UT;, 038 542 TOR CREDITS MAXIMUM DENSITY WITH 167 1154 TOR CREDITS p Page 8 of 13 Words underlined are added, word stfuelE thfaugh are deleted HA2012\2012103\WPTUDANinor Resubmitta]\Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA-PL-12014-0342) 4-10-14.docx Packet Page -240- EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE SUMMARY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECREATION AREA OPTIONAL GATE HOUSE ENTRY FEATURE LAND USE ACREAGE L�"' REQ ACREAGE OPEN SPACE RFR 377,12 70% 263.98 GREEKWAY/MULTI—USE PATHWAY URF 310.94 i 60% Isf�% RA p RECREATION AREA (PER PLAT) PRESERVE TRACT R RESIDENTIAL TRACT DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY DESCRIPTION DU/AC UNITS MAXIMUM DENS11-Y VVrTH0UT;, 038 542 TOR CREDITS MAXIMUM DENSITY WITH 167 1154 TOR CREDITS p Page 8 of 13 Words underlined are added, word stfuelE thfaugh are deleted HA2012\2012103\WPTUDANinor Resubmitta]\Naples Reserve RPUD (PUDA-PL-12014-0342) 4-10-14.docx Packet Page -240- 6/24/2014 9.D. 24D )) Wednesday, June 4, 2014 )) N A P L E S D A I LY N E W S 41 *McN Inc Mrr*INr. 0 tinver c NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, June 24, 2014, in the Board of County Commissioner Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07 -71, AS AMENDED, THE NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD), TO APPROVE THE EXCAVATION AND OFF -SITE HAULING OF 1,050,000 CUBIC YARDS OF FILL; TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE PRESERVE TRACT AND ADD PERMITTED USES; TO AMEND THE RPUD MASTER PLAN AND TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENTS TO LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ONE MILE NORTH OF U.S. 41 AND 1 -1/2 MILES EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 1,, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 688 + /- ACRES. (PUDA- PL20140000342) A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with'the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Manager, prior to presentation of the agenda item to. be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item.: The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the resppeective public hearing. In any case, written material intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days Eto the public hearing. All material used in. presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which, record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal. is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at- no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252 -8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK. By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) June 4. 2014 No 2027140 Packet Page -241-