Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/21/1989 R Naples, Florida, March 21, 1989 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board ot County Co..issioners in and tor the County ot Collier, and also acting as the Board ot Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) ot such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, aet on this date at 9:00 A.M. in R&aULAa szaSIO. in Building "F" ot the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the tollowing .eabers present: CHAIRMAN: Burt L. Saunders VICE-CHAIRMAN: Max A. Has.e, .Jr. Richard S. Shanahan Michael .J. Volpe Anne Goodnight ALSO PRESENT: .James C. Giles, Cleric; John Yonlcoslcy, Finane. Director; Ellie Hottman and Maureen Kenyon, Deputy Clerics; Ron McLe80re, Assistant County Manager; Brian MacKenzie, Assistant to the County Manager; David Weigel, Assistant County Attorney; Kevin 0 I Donnell, Public Services Administrator; Martha Skinner, Social Services Director; Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; George Archibald, Public Works Administrator; John Boldt, Water hanageaent Director; Pranlc Brutt, Community Development Services Adainistrator; Kenneth Baginski, Planning Services Manager; Charles Gauthier, Coaprehensive Planning Manager; Jett Perry, Chief Transportation Planner; Toa Crandall, Utilities Adainistrator; Clitt Crawtord, Parlcs , Recreation Director; Harry Huber, Assistant Public Worlc. A~1nistrator; Heyward Boyce, Coapliance Services Manager; Nancy Israel.on, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputie. Tom Storrar and Sam Bass, Sheritt's ottice. Pag.1 l -------. -0 -.-.- -- ----..-. March 21, 1989 hpe ~ It- n ~ - "PItuY&.U WIn ÇUJrG'U ec-1..100er ...... 8OV'ed, eecondeð by Co8a1_100er m..n-hen aDd carr led 1m8I118N81 '1, that the IIgenda be ap...l0V*<! wlth the tollowlDQ' c~: a. Add: It.. 12C - Approval ot Interlocal Agr.."ut to ..tabl1ab the Cr1a1nal .7u.tic. Intonaat1on Syat.. Council. b. Add: It.. 120 - Oi8CU88ion regarding Health racllitl.. Building. R.8que8ted by Co88i.81oner Saander.. c. Add: It.. 12£ - Inatallation ot a Scoreboard at I880kal.. Coammi ty Park tor I880kal.. Bl ;Jb School. bq1¡ee t ed by Co8aisslon.ar Goodnight. d. It.. 1486 - Reco D4ation to approve prap.....d 8811berab1p tor the Collier County Beach JIouriab8ent "Ad Boc:" Co8aitt... Contlnued to April 4, 1989, per Statt'. r8qQe8t. e. It.. 14D2 8OV'ed to 9D2 - Approval ot tiDal f1mding authoriza- tion tor .rngineerlng -rvice. tor Pba8e II 1t8g1on.al "'ter Tr.a~t Plant and I8ellt1eld bp8nalon. R.8que8 t ed by Co8al.s1oner Volpe. It.... ICI JIt7TU or r&RtI UT 2 8, a89 tamTIJfO - A.PP!tOv&.U AS PKUDTKD Co..issioner Hasse moved, seconded by Co..issioner Shanahan and carried unanimously. that the Minutee ot the meeting ot February 28, 1989, be approved a. presented. It.. nA IIØ"LOTD 8DYI CK AIUJWa - n.a b T IW Co..issioner Saunders recognized and congratulated Opal Smith, ot Social Services, and Sriwan Fredley, Parks & Recreation, tor ten years of continuous service with Collier County Government. He presented them with. certiticate and a pin. It.. nA1 DIICUSaIOII or LOCAL rt1JrDIJfO OPTIOn J'OJ( ru CO.¡ ITJltuCTIOII or 1.1t. 9&1 rJtO8C 0.1. U TO TO MARCo ISL.U'D IQUDCm - S'U.'" TO COJlDOCT PUBLIC ICDTIJfQS AJrD IIOItXSBOPS; PftOCKXD WIn GltOtha KUIAGDIU'r PL.U AMb~ TO IDOTI" ncusUT ~ U CAPITAL IMPJtOV:DøJrr KLDID"1' raft I MP1t()y ...... r::J TO S It - 51 ð 1; PltUAJlI ncuSUT uaOLUTIO. AXD BOJII) DOC~; PUltSUZ .70IJrT PUTICIPATIO. AmlU:IaJrr WIn rDO1' u BOIfDKD Il&n.8u&S; UD A UPORT '1'0 8E SUllMITTKD TO TIIZ BeC O. 3/21/89 Chiet Transportation Planner Perry stated that the issue of discussion concerns local tunding options to improve either in whole, Page 2 '"-"'--" --'----"". March 21, 1989 or in part, SR-9!11 between U.S. -'1 and Marco Island. He advised that the Level ot Service ot SR-9!11 is at capacity, and in ter.. ot Growth Manage_n t. this is an alar8ing issue that needs to be resolved as qu1ckly as possible, it the County is to be concurrent in the eyes ot the Departaent ot Co88unity Atfairs. He noted that the Exscutive Suaaary descr1bes the local options that are available, and the variou8 sources of revenue that could be used to supplement one or the other. He indicated that the priaary issue that needs to be resolved, is whether or not the County will move torward with local tunding, either in part, or in total ot the project, and once this has been decided, the sources ot revenue should then be determined. Mr. Perry ind1cated that it appears that in order to have sut- ticient funds within the concurrency period, a bond issue w111 be required. He noted that a n- source ot revenue is the toll option, which could be Dupplemented with existing revenues, 1.e. i.pact tees, existing gas taxes. local option sales taxes, or an MSTD. He stated that one ot the tactors that should be considered today, 18 that the County is running out of tiae regarding meeting the concurrency man- date ot the Growth Management Plan. He noted that the Level ot Service standards will beco.e ettective in August, and a comprehenslve plan aaendaent must be processed in time, in order to be concurrent. Co..issioner Hasse questioned whether Mr. Perry telt that the "tolling" ot SR-901 will pay tor the total widening ot that road? Mr. Perry stated that this is a local option, noting that there is $11 aillion in the State's Five Year Work Program, and the State has advised that this money may be used in corljunction wi th the needed $10 .illion which is 8issing to tund the project. He indicated that the State has assured statt that it the toll option or bond issue is used to fund the al1tire project ot $21 IDillion, the $11 million will con- tinue to stay in Collier County and will be used on another state tacility, i. e. U.S. 41. He advised that the analysis that was done by the bonding tirm, indicates that the toll option will support the entire 821 million. Page 3 ~ -------....". ------,..- March 21, 1989 Co..issioner Volpe asked it the decision is aade that local tunding will be used to tund SR-9~1, will it jeopardize the County's right to obtain State participation or reimbursement? Mr. Perry stated that the State is only obligated to pay baclc what is in the Five Year Work Program. He noted that there is also $13 million in the the Five Year Work Program tor the widening ot SR-29. Co..issioner Goodnight questioned how aany DRI's are in the Marco area that will have to use SR-9~1? Mr. Perry stated that the only DRI wh1ch will physically connect to SR-9~1 is Marco Shores. In an-er to Commissioner Goodnight, Mr. Perry advised th.t the bonding money is tor new sections ot rights-ot-way, noting that the County cannot be reimbursed the $2-1/2 million that has been spent tor rights-ot-way. Co..iss1oner Shanahan indicated that it appears necessary that a .eries ot meetings should be held to pre.ent materials to all interested parties ot the possibility ot a toll. He suggested that aeet1ng. be held during the next 2-3 weelcs at the Civic Center at the Isles ot Capri, MackIe Park, Goodland, and the Erin Isles area to intora the public how the program will be i.ple.ented, the t1nal costs, where the potential toll booth could be placed, tinance charges, duration ot the tolling, the real reasons tor the toll, the Level ot Service, safety factors, and who will benetit. He stated that he believes that the people at Marco, Isles ot Capri, Goodland, and those up and down SR-9~1 ehould be aeeured that the co..itted $11 million will be used tor the tunding ot this road. He noted that this is the t1.e to start thinking about the bridge, and suggested that when the road is paid tor through the tolls, .oney should then be escrowed tor the bridge. Co..issioner Saunders stated that it there is a toll, the construction costs should be kept to a .inimua, and the $11 million that the State has dedicated to SR-951 should be used tor that road. Co..iss1oner Shanahan stated that the County already has $2-1/2 .illion dollars in the project, the State w111 have $11 million in Page 4 q ._" .-----.-.-.-'" '.""....'..-'.--..."'----.----- - M ~'"., -,......... .-.--- March 21, 1989 the project, and it the people indicate that they are in tavor ot the toll, everyone will be participating in the project. Mr. Milton Leonard, President ot the Marco Island Civic Association, stated that in June, 1988, a questionnaire was submitted to the 1,300 .eabers ot the Association asking it they were in tavor ot paying a toll to tinance the SR-9~1 project. He noted that as ot "-,rch ~, 1989, 200 replies have been received with 62.'" in tavor at the toll; 34.4' Opposed to the toll; and undecided 3.2!11. He noted that ther~ was a .ajor .eabership drive during the second halt ot 1988, with ...bership now totaling 2,lðO, and 2~0 replles to the questionn.ire have now been received. . Mr. George Keller, President ot Collier County Civic 'ederation, .tated that the solutions that have been presented today have short- talls, and they will not do the job. He stated that the SR-9~1 pro- ject will take quite a while, and .uggested no truck trattic on that road, or the possibility ot making SR-961 one way going South, and CR-92 one way, going north. Public Morlcs Administrator Archibald noted that SR-9ð1 is an i~portant corridor to Marco Island and I-7ð, adding that he do.. not be 11.ve that a single direction approach should be considered. He stated that the emphasis should be put on the tour-laning. Mr. Keller turther suggested that the road could be extended on each side by tour teet so that there could be a passing lane on por- tlorua ot the road. He .tated that another possibility is to require that the "-,rco Shores develop.ent have an aqueduct ot 4 lane. down to U.S. U. He noted that the people ot Marco Island are not in tavor ot toll., the residents ot Isles ot Capri use Marco Island tor shopping, and suggested that the toll booth be placed on the north side ~t Isles ot Capri Road. Mr. Bob Stiers ot the Marco Island Taxpayer~ Association. indi- cated that hi. Association has studied this issue in so.. detal1, noting that the option ot a toll road should be left to the voters that are .ost attected. He stated that the Association has not taken Page ð JO . ...--.--.-..... . ....----- ._._.._-~- March 21, 1989 . pro or con position on the widening of SR-9!H. He .tated that batore a decision is made, the tollowing questions should be answered: 1. It Marco Islander's, Isles ot Capri, Goodland, etc. agree to pay tor the w..'-e...:.:¡g ot SR-951 through tolls, thus relieving the County and the State ot that obligation, will the tax- payers receive credit tor this? Suggestion: toll tor widening U.S. 41 North, and build SR-951 with County tunds. 2. It there are to be tolls, where will the booths be located, and what toll will be assessed? 3. Will tolls be ditterent tor ditterent types ot vehicles, i.e. tourist, residents, heavy truclcs and vans, etc.? 4. Will tolls apply one way or both ways? 5. How will access point. along SR-951 be controlled? 6. Will there be trontage road" to get to local businesses along the right-of-way? 7. Will local residents be allowed to purchase pass/decal? 8. Will Marco Shore. development have a second access to SR-951? 9. How aany dwelling units with access to SR-951 have been approved? 10. How &any commercial establishments have planned approval on SR-951? 11. Will there be meaningtul road impact tees asslgned to the new unit. to be developed? 12. Atter the bonds have been retired by the use ot the tolls and i.pact tees, will tolls continue to be collected and put into escrow tor another bridge? 13. What actual insurances will there be that the $11.5 million promised by PDOT will be committed to SR-951, and not used tor other County projects? Co..issloner Shanahan stated that everyone ot Hr. Stires questions will be addressed. In an-er to Commissioner Volpe, Hr. P~rry advised that the per- aanent population ot Marco Island is 9, 000, noting that ther--- are 211,1100 trips per day on Marco Island, during a 24-hour period. Mr.. Hancy Parker, President ot the Marco Island Taxpayers Association. stated that the Association would lilce to see a .ore detailed analysis published on the tinancial aspects ot all the alter- natives to the tunding question. Hr. Willi.. Hanley, President, Isles ot Capri Civlc Association, Page IS I' -- ,... .... .,........, - ..-""---- -.....~.. March 21, 1989 stated that thb other speakers have spolcen well regarding the problems ot tolling SR-951. He noted that the questions raised by the Marco Island Taxpayers' Association are si8ilar to those that his Association intended to raise. He advised that his Association is opposed to the tolling ot SR-951, noting that this does not suggest that they are not open to action which will result in the Isles ot Capri aaintaining the kInd ot services that they need. He indicated that 8Ost ot the residents rely on the servlces ot Marco Island, and it will be very deaanding to pay a toll to go to church, or the drug store. He noted that it there are to be tolls, the placement ot the toll booth is very important. Co..issioner Shanahan stated that SR-9!S1 needs the type ot discu.sion which is talcing place today tor the tollowing reasons: 1. The Level ot Service by State and County standards designates SR-951 as unsate to travel upon. 2. S.R. 951 is the only true evacuation route troll Marco Island and Isles ot Capr i. 3. SR-951 is an I-75 connector. Co..iusioner Shanahan read the tollowing question, as telephoned in by Mrs. Charlotte Westaan: SR-951 i8 not totally project ready. When will it be project ready? Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that the envlronmental permi ts will be received by the PDOT in the latter part ot this year. He indicated that S.R. 951 will be project ready tor construction at the end ot 1989. Co..issioner Volpe questioned the per-nent population ot Isle. ot Capri? Mr. Hanley replied approximately 1,000-1,200. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Commi9sioner Shanahan .tated that during peak s.ason there are 25,000 residents on Marco Island. Co..issioner Saunders 8tated that he would like to congratulate Co..issioner Shanahan tor bringIng this discu.sion item betore the Co..l.sion. He indicated that the County is now at the stage to do soaething regarding the situation ot SR-951, but the questlons to be answered are what is to be done, and what i8 the solution? Page 7 11.- , .,... ..._----~.-.._.,,-_...,_.._.. March 21, 1989 ec-J.-1aa..!' m.-._~ 80'984, eecODded by Co8a1-100er 800dnight, that 8t&ft be dIrected to: 1. Declðe what ..tbod ot public notlce/partic1pat1on 1. approprlate to g8QQ8 the CO88anity support tor the toll con- cept by conduc:tl~ 3 or 4 public ...t1Dg8 and a "Orkabop, In 11eu ot a r.teren4ua. 2. That in order to pr...rve our Growth ~t Plan opti0D8, prOGeed with the nec..eary Growth tIan.¡¡a~nt Plan ~t to identity the n.ce.eary rltV8nDe in the Cap.1 tal Iaprol......"ot II-..nt in order to tund the iaprov.--nt. to sa-t81 duri~ rr 89-t-O. 3. Pr8p8re the Dec"eary 1t.e8o1uUon autborlziDQ' a toll on Sa-181 and to prepare the n.ce.eary bond cSocu8enta. .. Pursue a Jolnt Partlcipatlon Agr---.nt wlth the rlorl48 Departaent ot Tranaportatlon regardlng tJw 1188 ot bon4ed r.~~ to advance and pay tor the c0D8tructlon ot SR-981. Co..issioner Shanahan stated that allot the above items are con- siderations that have to be addressed, noting that nothing is loclced in concrete, and gives the County the flexibility to do thlngs after the legislative hearing in April and May. He noted that these are aerely ways to prepare, it this is the route that will be taken. Co..issioner Goodnight suggested that when Start comes back with t~e intorMational package to be provided to the public, that they include various tolls tor different types ot vehicles, the possi b il1ty ot resident or business stickers, the idea ot one way tolling, with a toll booth located at SR-961 and U.S. 41. Co..issioner Volpe indicated that he concurs with the recO..en- dations ot Co..issioner Shanahan and Statt, but wonders it the issue to prepare the necessary resolution authorizing a toll and the pre- paration of the bond documents isn't a bit premature, since the Board is atte.pting to identify whether or not there is local support tor this alternative. He stated that it is critical that the County be assured that the $11.5 million committed by the State will be allo- cated tor SR-951. Mr. Perry advised that Item 4 relating to the Joint Partlcipation Agree..nt, advances the State tunds in the torm ot bonds, and the bond expert. wl11 .eet with Statt within the next 2 weeks to iron out all the details. Page 8 ,1 00'.'.-0__._'-.__.".""_0 _..",'...".". March 21, 1989 CO..is8ioner Hasse noted that he concurs with Co..issioner Shanahan's rec~..endation to conduct public intormational meetings. He noted that these meetings will give the people the opportunity to aake their wishes known. Co..issioner Saunders stated that the people that are in tavor ot the tolls or in OPposition to thea, should malce their views known at the series ot ..etings that will be held. He indicated that it it is determined that the senti.ent is not in tavor ot tolls, this issue will co.. back to the Board ot County Co..lssioners, and an evaluation will be _de as to whether to proceed, or hold a .traw ballot, reterendum, etc. Co..issioner Shanahan indicated that the intent ot his motion i. tor the preparation ot intoraation to b., prepared to present to the people, and to aaJce tinal decisions at a later date, 2-3 weelcs down the road, as to what the step will be, 1. II. a resolution or another course ot action. Co..i.sioner Saunders stated that in preparation tor the intor- -tional ..etings, he is suggesting that Statt prepare a plan ot tinance which includes tolling tor the $10 million portion, and State funding tor the $11 .illion portion; an indication ot the amount ot the toll. location ot toll plazas, and the clas8iticatlon ot users that will b., able to obtain resident/business decals. Co..issioner Hasse suggested that Statt include a ballparlc t igure tor the addition/widening ot the bridge, and the possibility ot con- tinuing the toll tor the bridge costs. Mr. Perry stated that Statt will prepare specitic guidelines as per the Co..ission's direction, and present them at next weelc's -sting. ec-1_100er St,.....han 888Dded hI. 8Ot1on to ret lect that the report by Start 1. to be pr888Dted to the Board on March 21, 1981. Cl-i_1oaer Goo4n1ght accepted the ~nt. Upon call tor ";be qa,eetiOl1, the 8Otion carrled unanl80U81y. .... 1tece8.: 10:1& A.M. - Jteconvened: 10:30 A.M. at which Deputy Clerk EBnyon replaced Deputy Clerk Bottaan ..... Page 9 ,~ ~ --...-- - March 21, 1989 It- ftA2 S"l'A7J' D~ TO n.lPAAZ A POD M&.aUUJ(T roJt TO StIIIIŒItI.OOD DKVU.OPMIDrT TO .. aoOQB1' BACI: I.S SOOIf AS POSSIBU .um I. TO I IITUDI, Tn ~ IS JIOT TO DO AJrTTBI.O X. VIOLA'rI~ or TO O1lIOIJrAL POD Planning Services Manager Baginski stated that this item deals with the Suamerwood POD otherwise known as Timberlakes. He stated that this project was originally approved in Dece.ber 1981, and within the developaent conditions there were three pertinent sections; Section 3.5 Trattic. which required the entrance road into the develop- sent to be aligned with the industrial park on ~h~ northern side ot Radio Road and condition "B" under that salle section required a sid~alk to be provided along one side ot the intersection with the loop road and the third section which 18 3.7, required that a natural butter or vegetation butter along the west property line be established approximately 80 teet in width along the northern portion and a ainimum width ot approximately 50 teet be maintained along the southern portion ot said buffer. He stated that in September ot 1988, a site development plan tor Ti.berlakes at Suamerwood was accepted by the Planning Services Section and during a review it was noted that no portion ot the property under the control ot Suamerwood aligned with the entrance road to the industrial park to the north and across Radio Road. He indicated that since the alignment to the entrance road ot Suaaerwood was i.possible, it was determined that the aost appropriate aethod of solving this problem would be to require the aaxiaum separa- tion between the existing industrial intersection and the proposed entrance into Suamerwood. He stated that the site plan was distri- buted to the various review agencies within th~ County and it was the consensus that this would be the appropriate change to make in teras of satety and circulation. He noted that the plan was approved admi- nistratively and since that time, he has been advised that slnce the condition for the 80 toot butter was specitically ident it ied in the PUD conditione, there was not the administrative authority to approve such a change. He noted that under the circumstances he is bringing baclc the request to the Board, aslcing that Statt be directed to ini- Page 10 / Jh ---.,,-. . "'..-- March 21, 1989 t1ate the PUD aaendaent incorporating the changes and whil. the PUD aaendaent 1s being processed, the Developer be allowed to continue with the construction ot the development aa per the approved lIIodit1ed site developllent plan. In anBW4!r to Commissioner Hasse. Hr. Baginslci stated that the the buildings are in the approxiaate salle contiguration but the loca- tion of the structures have changed. Mr. ~gins'd stated that the site plan reflects the desires ot the developer in terms ot numbers and location ot the buildings. adding that all statt members participated in the review. He stated that the location ot the entrance road was relocated due to necessity because during the review it was deter~ined tha~ it was impossible to comply w1th the original plan as there is no way to al1gn the road. He noted that the properties are not adjacent. are not opposite and the deve- loper does not own the property opposite the industrial park where the entrance is to be provided. He indicated that in light ot the tact, the align.aent cannot be made, the next alternative is to separate those intersections as much as possible to provide tor stacking and turning aovement as well as safety. Co..issioner Hasse stated that this was a aajor change and the developer should not have been granted permission to move the road or the buildings. Co..issioner Volpe questioned how the Board ot County Co..is.ioners could approve the location ot the exit road it the deve- loper did not control the property, to wh1ch Hr. Baginslcl stated that this was approved in 1981 and this is a ditterent owner ot the pro- perty then when the plan was originally heard. He stated that the original owner did own or have possession or control that property. Co..issioner Volpe questioned it statt is recolll8ending that the Plann1ng Service. Departaent initiate the PUD amendment, to which Mr. Baginaki replied attirmatively. hpe n Mr. Baginski stated that Statf readily admits the error in ter- Page 11 Ji, .".. _.."_-<-""-"."'."."'. -.."".""""""""--' March 21, 1989 ot looking at this aatter as a ainor change subject to adalnistrative approval. He stated that the applicant did not violate the terllls, adding that he eubaitted plans and changes were aade based on the request ot revi~ing agencies. He stated that additional landscaping has been requested to try and aitigate the reduction in the butter. He stated that the entrance road was changed at the request ot the revi_lng statt. not ing that the applicant has atteapted to work with Statt with regards to suggestions and recoamendations that were made. He stated that he teels that it is appropriate tor Statt to generate the request. Attorney David Leigh, representing the residents ot Coconut Creek Estates, reterred to a map showing the original proposal ot the Suaaerwood Development in 1981, adding that it had the entrance road and a parking lot on the west side next to Coconut Creelc Estates with two bul1dings in that area. He noted that at a meeting on Deceaber 1, 1981, the petition was deterred until the Homeowners ot Coconut Creelc Estates had a meeting with the developer. He stated that some ot the proposed changes being considered were the density which would go troa 6.22 units to . units, the number ot actual units would go troll 92 to 60 unlts. and a butter area would be provided along the western and southern edge. He stated that these changes were approved by the surrounding property owners atter aeeting with the developer on Deceaber 3, and December 10. 1981. He noted that the road had been aoved tart her to the east at this tis. with a minimum butter ot 80 teet and Statt wae reco..ending approval. He indicated that Mr. Tom Beaver, representing the Coconut Creelc Homeowners at that time, indi- cated that the homeowners' consensus was tor approval based on the plan at that time. He noted that the changes troll the original plan to the second plan is the one that is actually in the PUD and the changes ~hat were involved were the density which was reduced troD 6.22 to .. units, the buildings were reduced trom 9 to 6 and were also aoved to the east side ot the little lalce away troe Coconut Creelc and the parking lots were moved to the east side ot the bulldlngs, the Page 12 ,1 , --,.-...- . -,---,-.--..--.. "".""'.'-""- . . March 21, 1989 little lake was lett as a butter, the butter zone was added along the M1tst side ot the project, and the road was aoved to the east side ot the little strip that 90es out to Radio Road. He indicated that these changes M1tre aade in Dece.ber, 1981, and the PUD was approved on thls basis. He reported that thill project sat tor a long tiae and then developers M1tre changed. He stated that in the tall ot 1988, County statt approved a revised site development plan with the tollowing changes; the road wall aoved back to the west side, the number ot buildings was incre..sed trom 6 to 8 and the two westerly buildings are now shown directly next to Coconut Creelc at the west side ot the pro- ject. the 11 ttle butter lake has been eliminated and there is only one big lake, the roadway and the parking has been aoved back to the west side ot the buildings, tennis courts, pool and poolhouse were added next to Coconut Creek Estates, and the vegetation butter has been reduced and eliainated throughout the len9th ot the project next to Coconut Creek Estates. He noted that on January 23, 1989. one ot the owner. ot Coconut Creek Estates was told by County statt that the development at Timberlakes would proceed according to the original PUD. He indlcated that on .January 25, 1989, the bulldozers eliminated signlticant portions ot the vegetation butter. He indicated that County statt stated that these were sinor changes and statt was authorized to aake those changes, adding that these are not sinor changes. He noted that the residents have been deprived ot their legal and aoral rights and deserve to be heard. He stated that he is re-questing that the Board deter this satter until these issues can be resolved and in the .eantiae, stop all construction. Attorney Kathleen Passidoao, representing OHA Development who i. the developer ot Timberlake Club at Su_erwood, stated that .he is totally unprepared because her client tound out about this hearing at 8 a.a. this date. She stated that the attorney tor the neighborhood is well prepared but her client was not given notice ot this hearing. She stated that it the Board is going to review the PUD document, the developer needs an opportunity to discuss these issues with the people Page 13 !~ --- ..--.....,.... . . -. _'N_"'_. " March 21, 19851 involved. She noted that when her cllent purchased the property, he reviewed the ~D and Section 3.6 ot the POD provides that minor design changes .hall be permitted with adainistrative approval ot the County staU. She noted that her client worked with the Statf and got a site plan approved, adding that in a letter ot November 23, 1988, County statt approved the revised site plan and her client acted and relled upon that approval. Co..is.ioner Saunders stated that generally speaking it a statt person ..xe. a ai.take and it turns out that this person did not have the legal authority to do this, his understanding ot the law is that one cannot rely to their detriaent on the aistake ot Statt. He stated that the Board still has the authority to say that Statt II18de a ai.take and ~erything is started allover again. Assistant County Attorney Weigel stated that Comaissioner Saunders' ander.tanding is correct. Ms. Pas.idoao stated that .he has not had a chance to research this 1_, but her client has a road in there and there are building pads tor the buildings, a lake that has been nearly excavated and he h~s acId .'iJ ot the 60 units and is under reservation tor the balance of the units. She stated that her client has building permits and it is ditt icult to say that one cannot rely on the law. She stated that it the PUD is opened tor review, it has to go baclc through Statt again. She questioned it Statt determines that the building or road should be 8Oved, who is going to pay tor this and what will her client say to the 60 buyers? She stated that this could be a real problem. She noted that her client's position is to worlc with Start, the Board, and the property owners. She stated that they are willing to put in add1tlonal landscaping and willing to buIld a wall, but to take action on this aatter without giving everyone proper notice is not tair. Co..issioner Saunders stated that he agrees that everyone should have proper notice, adding that it would not be fair to II18ke any deci- sions that would be detrimental to Ms. Passidomo's client this date, but 80aething has to be done to prevent any turther hara to the Page 14 I~ ----.~._.._~-"-,_. . .._~..". ,....--..-,-,"'."'- . ... -.--.-- - , .-- .--..--...... March 21, 1989 .urrounding property owners. Co..issioner Hasse stated that he would not object ':0 grant ing the developer and his attorney sore time to do their research as long as everything in the development stays status quo at the present time. Co..isaioner Volpe questioned it proper notice was given, to which Mr. Baginski stated that tormal notitication was not glven to anyone regarding this satter. Co..issioner Volpe questioned it Co..issioner Hass. is suggesting that no turther construction take place and that there be a "red tag- put on the project, to which Co..issioner Hasse replied attiraatively, adding that this will give everyone a chance to research the satter. Ms. Passidomo stated that construction should not be stopped as this ,.,ill cost her client a tremendous amount ot money. She noted that he is under a time schedule and has subcontractors lined up tor this job. She stated that according to her client, the butter zone is totally intact except tor the entry road and this is something that the Board needs to look into. She stated that it is not tair to stop construction and they have a valid building permit. Co..issioner Saunders stated that he does not teel that any deci- sion can be -de this date, adding that they are simply being aslced to start a PUD process and indicated that he would suggest that Stat! be directed to prepare the necessary amendment to the PUD and that the developer be put on notice that there is no guarantee that they will have an approved PUD document. He stated that trom this point tor- "'ard, the client is being put on notice that he is acting at his own peril it he continues construction. He noted that he does not teel that the Board should say no turther construction, adding that the developer should have this option but it he continues construction, there could be a problem. Co..is8ioner Volpe questioned what happens it the developer pro- ceede on his own and the -endment i8 not approved and the road has been pu t in, to which Commissioner Saunders stated that it Stat! ls directed to initiate the PUD docuaent and the developer has been Page lð 'to --, March 21, 1989 ordered not to do any construction, and the PUD changes are approved, then there could be a po8sibility of probleas because the change. were approved and yet the developer could not do any worlc tor two or three 80nths. He noted that it the Board indicates that they continue construction on their own perils, and the PUD amendments are not approved, then they will have to remove whatever tacl11t1es they put In. .... P...ido80 stated that since they did not get notice ot the hearing, it should be continued tor a weelc or two and that wl11 give her a chance to review this satter. Assistant County Manager McLemore stated that the intent was not to have. public hearing and a public hearing cannot be held without due notlce. He stated that Start is .sking to establi.h this process. Co..is8ioner Volpe stated that he teels that the most appropriate suggestion was aade by the Chairman which is to put the developer on notice that he cannot rely upon what has previously been sald with regards to the site plan and then initiate the process tor a POD aaendaent and have the developer worlc with the adjoining property owner. to ~ sure that he has the support for the changes that are being considered. M.. Passidoao stated that she would suggest that the only things that get reviewed are the amendaents, to which Co..i.sioner Volpe stated that this is the intent. C i-.iCJD8'r 88andera 8OV'ed, eec0D4e4 br Co88i_iooer Vol"", that 't~t be directed to initiate a Planned th11t DevelO¡88Dt ~t 1It1U.z1.Dg' the ...rvency ordinancs procedure lt that i. legally per- ai_ibIs 1IDd, it not, then to azped.lte tbi... 81ICh .. poss1ble, aDd that the ec-1_1on state that the c2eveloper, it he proceed.8 tmder the plan that he le C'Urr8I1tly proceedlng under, do 80 at hi. own r i8k .. the ec-1_ion ls not aaying that he can or C8DD0t proceed.. The following people spoke against this PUD amendment indlcating that there are violations of the docuaent with regards to relocation ot infrastruct'lres, lack of cooperation from statt and developer, Page 16 ~l --_.,..." March 21, 1989 re8OVal ot trees, laclc ot privacy, devaluatlon ot property, increase ln derutity, re¡ocation ot the road, destroying the butter area, and relocation ot entrance a8 well as a lack ot a tiae period on a PUD: hthy Fort Debby Cully To. Beaver 'rederick Nystro. George ICeller Co..i.sioner Has.e que.tioned it there is a li.it on PUD's at the present tiae, to which Mr. McLesore stated that the Co.prehensive Plan envi.ions .088 changes in the tiee limit. He noted that this will put the Board on alert to the proce.s change. and recommendations that will be coaing betore the Board in the near tuture. Mr. Baginski stated that under the existing ordinance there are no limltations to a tise limit on PUD's, adding that the Statt, ln con- junction with the consultants, is revislting the condltions ln the exlsting zoning ordinance. He stated that he can assure the Board that no one on hfs statt has taken a casual approach to thls aatter. Co..i..ioner Volpe stated that the changes that have been approved do not appear to be sinor changes, adding that he would like to have SO88 intoraation as to how this entire aatter was handled internally b-J the Start. Attorney Lelgh stated that he would be glad to work with the deve- loper quickly, and the Board can say that the developer i. acting at his cnm perils, but once the trees are gone, they cannot be replaced. He stated that it 8Ust be illegal to allow the developer to continue in contravention ot the existing PUD. Co..issioner Shanahan stated that he would lilce to consider pre- paring the PUD amendment and put a stop on the develop.ent untl1 it i. co.pleted. "-i..1aDer ~ra w1 thdrew hi. 8OtJon aDd ec-J_iODer Volpe wt.bA ... Ä18 eec" 04. Co..ls.ioner Saunders stated that he teals that there were so.e al.take. _de at the statt level and he does not tee 1 that thi. could be considered a sinor deviation. He indicated that one ot the hardest things that the Board has to do 18 to protect neighborhoods. Page 17 ~'Y ---............ .,--- March 21. 1989 '"- 1 ..1oDer ~ hen IIOV8d. , 8eCODðed by Co88.1..iooer ....., to dIree~ .taft to prepare the approprlate Pt1D d~n~ 88118nd88nt. to reflect the D8Ce88ary cbange8 and that the developer 1. DO~ to do anytlLJ..Dg tl¡a~ 18 in violation ot the orlg1nal Pt1D do<:._ut. Mr. N~gar, developer, stated that the landscaping has only been a ainor change and they coabined the two lake.. He stated that the buildings do not tace the neigh¡"ors, noting that the recreation taci- 11 ties are in that area. Mr. McLellOre stated that the issue is whether there ha. been a 8Ubstantial change and in the opinion ot the County Attorney, there h... been. He noted that this .is the only issue at this time. Mr. Keygar stated that the Board approved this plan and the only problem was the road, noting that he has an obligation to the people that have purchased these hoses. He noted that he has a ti- 11aft which lndicates that these people are supposed to able to move in during the IIOnth ot .July. Co..issloner Volpe stated that he needs all the intoraation on this aatter betore he can -Ice any decision. Upoa call tor the q1W8tion, the 8Otlon carried QD8DJ.aoaal'1. ..... Jteceee: 11: 55 A.M. - 1lec0DV1tD8d: 12:0& P.M. at wtUch t~ Deputy Clerk Bott88D replaced Deputy Clerk ~ ..... I t- .,81 rICILIT1' L&&n a.q-nftoUlT Un.&&III 'l1tI acc UD 'l1tI SCHOOL 8OAJt:D rea osz or A PC8:rI0Jf cw rn COOan BAD rACILIT1' AT D8IODLU rea SCIIOOL BUS paJTT18V U'J) ~ - APPJtOVn AS ADJIDKD Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that this item is a reco--ndation tor approval ot a lease with the School Board '?or use ot a portion ot property at the County Bar~ complex in I_olcalee. He noted that tor the past year, the School Board has been using this property tor their bus operations, noting that they have done their aaintenance work and cleaning ot the buses at that location. He ind- icated that the School Board has suggested a lease, which provides tor 7/10 acres on the west side ot th~ current County Barn complex, addlng that the ainiaua lease that they can conside~ is tor 40 years. He Page 18 ~'1; ... ..0_._- "--'_'_'_0- M March 21, 1989 noted that it the lease is approved, the School Board desires to construct a s8811 88intenance building ot approximately 2,400 square teet. He advised that upon teraination ot the lease, the aaintenance building will becoae the property ot the County. Mr. Archibald advised that the regaining conditions ot the lease are tairly standard: insurance requireaents, and indemnitlcatlon. He auggested that a change be made to the lease, Article 8, second paragraph, noting that there is a typo which indicate. the "Lessor" shall be tully responsible tor any and all laprovelllent., repairs, alterations..... He stated that "Lessor" should be changed to "Les...". Mr. Archibald indicated that Statt is reco..endlng approval ot the lea.e, notinq that there are three ite.. ot concern: 1. The ti8e ot the lease. 2. $780/per year tor the cost ot providing water and electrlcal service. 3. Teraination clause which makes the County responslble tor the building that will be constructed by the School Board, it tor any reason the County desires to talce that site over tor its use. In answer to Colll8issioner Hasse, Hr. Archibald stated that the l~"e contains a condeanation clause which counters the 40 year clause, which allows the County to take condeanation action to acquire that property or reaove the lease, at the County's expense. Co..issioner Goodnight stated that there is plenty ot land on the available property, and it thia lease is not approved, the School Board wll1 be using the property next to I"okalee High School, whlch will put additional trattic on the already congested Iaaokalee Drive. "'-i-.1C1D8r Goodnight 8O9'8d, .-c0Ddecl by ec-l_i0D8r JIa8ee aDd carr18d -i~l'1, to accept the r-.:;, Tn4atlon ot St81t, app.. õ....1Dg the le88e. - ~. Page Ii ~q ---,------.-----..--...,...... .. '.". .. ,.".._.._.~.........- ,-.........,..- .. March 21, 1989 I~ ...1 D:t.UiCUC8 .. PO88IX.& ALT'KIOI.\TIVU U IXPLDIDTIJrO II.APLa PAU .&.aU rwa..-.- IJ8I~..._¿a - PItO.:ntcT u-..1UUUU1, DU I GJI 8DVI CD TO COftD1tJ8 TO CC88"LI:n rw a nr aaw PLA.8: COit$utOCTIOW sncs . PKJIXIT1I TO n JU.ADT ro-. wvnI.. IMPLaaDr'rATIO., .um IDDTIJ'TI.O COST .um OPTIOIIS Environaental Services Division Administrator Lorenz stated that on Jan-.1ary 3. 1989, the Board approved sending an intor_tional package and questionnaire to all property owners in the Naple. Park study area. He noted that 3,050 questionnaires were _fled; 801 or 26' questionnaires were returned. He noted that 150 indlviduals were in tavor ot the pri.ary i.prove.ents to the drainage syste.; 146 indl- vidual. _re in tavor ot both the pri_ry and secondary i.provements; 296 individual. were in tavor ot sol8e type of i.prove.ent, and 505 individuals _re not in tavor ot either pri.ary or secondary iaprove- -nt.. Mr. Lorenz indicated that a special meeting was held with the Naples Park Area Association on Pebruary 23, 1989, to revi- the results ot the questionnaire, and the majorlty ot the property owners that attended the _eting were not in tavor ot proceeding with the propos&d drainage i.prove.ent project. Mr. Lorenz stated that Statt has arrived at six possible alter- natives tor the Commission's considera.ion: 1. Declare a public necessity and direct Statf to proceed with project and creation ot a Special Assessment Distrlct tor the entire proposed primary improvements (Estimated cost. 53,310,000). 2. Direct Statt to reduce scope ot project to include only the proposed priaary i.prove.ents in so-called South Basin (Estimated cost - 51,960,000) and proceed in creation ot Special Assess18ent District tor the smaller benefiting area. 3. Project be deferred, but that design services be contlnued tor the purposes ot: (a) having a completed drainage plan for Ifaples Park; (b) having avail~ble construction specitica- tions, bidding docu.ents and agency peralta ready tor tuture project implementation, and (c) identifying construction cost and construction options. .. Request local sponsors to provide petition signed by 60' plus one ot all attected property owners requesting i.ple.entatlon ot all or part ot the project. 5. Determine that there is not enough public support tor project and direct Statt to not proceed wlth project. 6. Wait ror implementation ot County-wide capital lmprove.ent program and possible creation ot a Stormwater Utillty Fee Syste. to finance all capital projects. Page 20 JI "_..0_..__... March 21, 1989 Mr. I.orenz stated that because ot the Icinds ot proble.. experienced in the area, and the degree ot nonsupport ot the project, voiced by return ot the questionnaires, Statt is reco..ending that no turther action be taken, unless the local sponsors provide a petition signed by ~O, plus one ot all attected property owners reque.ting implementation ot all or part ot the project. The t01lOW1~~ persons spoke in tavor of lmplementing Naples Parlc Area Drai~g. Iaprovements: T81p8 «: Mr. Red jaDes Mr. Anthony MaisIe Mrs. I.orene Mood Mr. Ilobert Milson Mrs. Anna ..... e n (also read a letter from Susan Anchraa) Letter tro. Susan Anchraa Mrs. judy Mazza Mr. Frank Mazza Mrs. Dolores JCleln Mr.. Jeannette Poresaan Mr. George King Mrs. Lucy Veccia Mr. Rlchard Mood Mr. George Keller Mr. Predericlc Metzger Those .peaJters in tavor ot the improvem~nts cited the tollowing: In tavor of iaprove.ents, but those livlng on the canal should have a higher assessment; open ditches are a safety problem; a better financing plan is desired, and the County should bear a portion ot the responsibility; stagnant water aids in the breeding ot ao8quitoes, and i. a public health problem; erosion has 11mi ted the land where children wait tor school buse., and is a dangerous situatlon; tlooding attracts alligators, snakes and rats; an adequate syste. needs to be provided now; Beachwallc should be included and assee.ed the saae as other properties; assess.ents should be co..puted by square tootage of property; present ditches and swales are an open invitation to gar- bags, doqs and litter. The following per.ons spoke against impleaentlng Naple. Park Area Drainage r.prove.ents: Mr. Barry Purdy Mr. Ilobert Sourbeer Mrs. Marie Sourbeer Mr. Lewls Miener Mr. Anthony Terrible Page 21 1'2-- -~ , -~ ._._-,- ~, ,- March 21, 1989 Mr. Richard Pett Mrs. Belen Pett Those persona speaking against the improvements cited the following reasons of opposition: 60" or acre ot the Naples Park resi- dents do not experience tlooding or erosion, and preter to wait tor a County-wide Coaprehensive Drainage System; sewer system installed in the 1980's has been a great improvement, and there 1s now less standing water; another study should be conducted, or a second opinion should be obtained; Beachwallc and the Pavilion have been designed with lakes and a perimeter Mall which prevents runoft into other deve- lop88nts; n- system .,il1 not benetit the Beachwalk, and theretore, it is lnappropriate to include this area. Co..issioner Volpe stated that he attended at least one ot the public meetings that was held, adding that as a result at today's com- ments there seeas to be concerns relating to tloodlng proble. and public health. He indicated that he understood that the study was to deteraine a problem ot tlooding, as opposed to public health. Mr. Lorenz advised that the study addressed the drainage proble.., and the Levels ot Standards. Mr. Dan Brundage, ot Agnol1, Barber and Brundage, stated that it the drainage proble. is solved, the aajor health proble.. wll1 also be solved. Be advised that the system as proposed, will take great steps to eli.inate tlood1ng. Co..iss1oner Volpe stated that based upon what he has read, and tro. the co..ents that have been aade, he 1s not persuaded that Alternative '1 is something that he can support since the people who live in the area are not supportive of this drainage progr~. He questioned when there Mill be a Master Plan tor stor8Water runott? Mater Management Director Boldt stated that RFP's tor the Master Plan have been sent out, and will be submitted at the end of the month for the .election process. He noted that most ot the work will be coapleted by August or September. Co..1ssioner Shanahan stated that he teels that there i. a public Page 22 ø _._"--" March 21, 1989 necessity, and he is trying to read into the interpretation ot Statt'8 reco..endation ot Alternative #,. Mr. Boldt advised that overwhelming coaaents ot criticis. about the variou8 parts ot the project were made at the public meeting at the High School, and it is difticult to say that there is good public 811pport. He noted that there is a good public need and nece8sity, and he telt that the solution would be to ask for support by the aajorlty ot the people ot the area that will be impacted by the project. CO..is8ioner Shanahan stated that his recoamendation is to con- sider a public necessity. and tind the appropriate tundlng. Co..issioner Goodnight stated that there is a public necessity. She noted that she teels that the Board ot County Coamissioners will 811pport the utility tax tor the stormwater aanage.ent tee that will be proposed in the coming months. She questioned it the Naples Park residents pay tor their drainage, does this .ean they will be elimi- nated tro. the utility tee? She indicated that she has a real proble. with taxing these people twice. She stated that she believes that Alternative #3 "ill get the Coaais8ion exactly what it is looklng tor. 'hpe H r-i-1oaer Oooc2ni ;Jbt 8OV'ed, -.ccmded by Co88.1..1or:wr Volpe, to 8CC8p"t 8t:a.tt' s rec Ddatlon of Alternatlve .3: Project be deterred bat ~t deelgn eervlc.. be contlnued tor the pa.r'pO88 ot: (a) hav 1 DQ' a CO8plsted c1re.1nage plan tor .aple. Park; (b) having available COD8tra.ct ion spec 1 t i ca t ions, b i cSc1 ing c1ocu8en t . and agoency pera its reedy tar tut:are project 1IIp1888'D.taUon; and (c) i den ti ty 1ng construc- t 1 011 coe-t and COI18 t ru c t 1 on opt 1 ons. In &n8Wer to Coaaissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald stated that Statt will have to come back with Alternative 63 to provide the dollar, a.aoun t, funding and the time frame, noting that it will take from 6-9 aonths to obtain environmental permits. Co..issioner Saunders advised that he agrees with Co..1.s1oner Goodnight, noting that the engineering and design work will be con- tinued tor construction. no satter how the project will be tunded. He Page 23 J{ -,- ,. -,---, , . -. ..---.. March 21, 19B9 added that this will give the County the opportunlty to investigate other tunding ~chanis.s, including the utility tee, and it allows the greatest degree ot flexibility. Co..issioner Hasse questioned how long it wlll take to construct the iaprove8ents? Mr. Archibald advised that it will take between 9-12 8Onths, after the per.its are obtalned. Opaa call tor the qaaation, the 8Otlon carried. 'V"aftt--u.ly. It- .-1 Au,¡:--I%A"I'I08 TO ISSU'Z IUJtCO ISLAJrI) ~AlJtU.T JUDrOO1U:IJDQJrT rACU.ITXU ~A.L OJSLIcaTIO1f BOM)S - A.rrJWY&.U Assistant County Manager McLemore advised that on Hovember 8, 1988, the residents ot Marco Island Beach front properties voted by reterendua to create the Marco Island Beachtront Renourish8ent Facilitle. Municipal Services Taxing Unlt tor the purpose ot renourishing certain sections of Marco Island Beaches. He indicated that on March 10, 1988, Harry Huber, trom the County Capltal Projects Start, Frank Blanchard, and Margaret Kelley ot the Marco Island Beach Renourishaent Co..ittee, presented the project to the Collier County Pinance Coaaittee tor evaluation and co..ent. Mr. McLe80re stated that the Pinance Co..ittee made several findlngs: 1. The estimated budget tor the project exceeds the bond authority provided tor in the reterendum, but there are several alternatives to mitigate the situation, and concluded that the County should move ahead with the Bond Issue at its authority level ot $5 million. 2. Move the Issue as quickly as possible because ot the inclining nature ot interest rates. 3. Due to special characteristics and complexities ot the taxing district, a negotiated sale would be preterable to a com- petitive sale. 4. Attempt to tinance the Issue within the 1.2 .ill goal ot the Advisory Co..ittee, with seven years being ideal, and ten years being the aaxiaum. Coaal..ioner Saunders stated that he feels that becau.e ot the s...ll nature ot the $5 .illion General Obligation Issue, there is no real Deed to have Co-Managers. He noted that the backup lndlcate. a bond lseuance cost ot $150.00, but there is no breakdown a. to haw Page 24 .JS'" ...-.- ._-'-~-""'- ,"...----. March 21, 1989 8Uch ls Onderwrlters Counsel, Bond Counse 1, FA Pees, or proposed average takedOWl1 and expenses. Mr. McLe80re indicated that he agrees with Coaal.sioner Saunders that because ot the size ot the Issue, a Co-Manager is not technically needed. Be noted that in order to expedite the project, the exi8ting authority under the RPP was being used, rather than going baclc to a 90 or 120 day 8elec~ion process. Mr. David 'lecher ot SunTrust Securitie., Inc. stated that with regard to the $150,000 bond issuance cost. an estiaated three points ti... the bond issue is used. Co..issioner Ha.se questioned the shorttall ot 8310,0007 Mr. McLemore lndicated that the bond issuance cost was not pro- vided tor in the original budget authority. He noted that the project could be reduced trom 150' to 125' ot beachtront renourishment in order to reduce the shorttall. Co..issioner Saunders noted concerns ot Iceeping the tee. at a .in18W1. Mr. Michael Hole. Second Vice President with Smith Barney, stated that with a 7 year term, the takedown will be øigniticantly less than a 10 or 20 year bond issue, adding that the costs ot tinanclng will be lower. Co..issioner Shanahan indicated that when dealing with a 85 m1111on bond i.sue it does not appear that dual Underwriters are nece.sary. He stated that under the circuastances, it -y be tor expedience .ake, and he would like to sove on the program a. quickly a. possible. ~1..100er a.ander. 8C798d, to approve the rec 1"""'tlaa ot the ri~ ec-1tt.., bat without the Co-tI8nager, .. toll0W8: 1. Coanty I8anager to De9Qtlate a contract with the tollcrdng peJ'80D8 and tlr88 in an 88O'1U1t not to exc..-d the authority proy1ded by the Io8rd ot Coanty Coaai..loner. tor the 1881I8DCe 0 t the .June, 1981, 7.79 M1111on hI.. Tax Bond I 88Q8: ..". r1acher - rl8C&l A4vlsor 8a1 tl1 8arDey - Onðenrr 1 ter Il8anager "'~, Cllb11n, Stetfen.e . .icbr8OD - Bond C01I:D881 Co..1.sioner Goodnight questioned whether there will be a proble. wi th this? Page 2ð jfø ."...~.,...".,'-," .."...._,_.....,_.......,,- March 21, 1989 Finance Director Yonkoslcy stated that the only reason the Finance Co-ittee chose to go with the Senior Manager/Co-Manager relationship was that this was the exact saae toraat that was approved and accepted by the Board tor the 87,900,000 Issue. He advised that there will be no proble. by not having a Co-Manager. ec-1..iao.r ..... 88Conded the 8Otlon. Co_issioner Saunders stated that the Co..ission will have the oppor~ity to approve the budget tor the construction project. Co_issioner Volpe questioned whether there is additional intor- aation relating to a negotiated sale vs. competitive sale? Mr. Fischer stated that he has touched base with .0.. ot the ln8Urers. noting that he does not know what the outco.e will be. He noted that he is still recoaaending a negotiated sale. Co_issioner Volpe questioned the breakdown ot tees tor the 87.79 million Bond Issue? Mr. Fischer stated that the Investaent Banking Fee was 1.4', and Underwriters Counsel, Plnancial Advisor, and Insurance added up to 3%. Co..issioner Shanahan questioned whether deleting the Co-Manager will change the tinancing costs? r;r. Pischer responded negatively. Mr. Frank Blanchard stated that he appreciates the Manager's suggestions. Clerk Giles stated that with regard to the overage over the S~ 8illlon, there is .oney tro. County-wide tunds when 8Oney is spent on beach renourish8ent, which .ay help to make up the d1tterence. He noted that when there are competitive negotiations, the aanagement tee, attorneys tees, and tinancial advisor tees can usually be nego- tiated. He noted that the Board .ay desire to hold ott on approving the t a.aoun t un t il an analysis can be provided by Statt. Co..issioner Saunders stated that as long as the Flnancial Advlsor is assuring that these tee. will be kept to an absolute 8inisum, he ls co.tortable. Mr. Fischer stated that betore the Bond Issue i. presented to the Page 26 J1 -_._'"'~'"...... March 21, 1989 Board ot County Coraissioners tor a purchase agreement, all the tee. wl11 be presented tor the Board's approval. .... call tor 1:bo qa.88UOD, the 8Otlon carried 4/1 (~i_loaer m-. L "1 .l.J....Clu4). ... 1/ .. l.,. Ct.rk K.8ayoD ~laced Deputy Clerk Bot1'-..n at thi. tu. ... 11:- ~1 ~ 08 US1' IL\Pt.U ~ JII L n P AJtJt - ~.... ILU Public Services Administrator Kevin O'Donnell stated that on Deceaber 13, 1988, the Board awarded bids tor Phase II ot the construction tacilities tor the East "aples Coaaunity Parlc but the project has been delayed tor a number ot reasons. He noted that there were problem. with DKR as well as other regulatory agencies. He noted that they are now proceeding on this park. Mr. Toa Peek ot Wilson, Miller, Barton, SoIl ,. Peek, Inc., st..ted that Better Roads and Mid-Continent Electric ot Naples are the two p~i.. contractors on the construction ot the tacilities and at this polnt all contr~ctors are on-site and working. He stated that the underground electric conduit is in place, the pads tor the bul1dings are ln place and hope tully, the toundations are being poured this date. He indicated that the underground sewer piping and the manholes are on-site and ready to go into the ground. He stated that the pedestrian jogging paths around the lake are being constructed at this time. adding that everything is go at the site with a project comple- tion around August 1, 1989. In an.--r to Commissioner Hasse, Hr. P.,elc stated that in 1982 the bond is8Ue was approved tor a park prograa and subsequent to that, there was a selection process and his tirm was hired in later 1983. He stated that the development prograa that was set torth that indi- cated what would be in the parlcs was done in 1984 and construction be<¡ an in 1980. He noted that some ot the parlcs were completed and opened two years ago. He noted that part ot the reason that this parlc W&.8 the lu,t one to start construction was because there was an Page 27 ~~ .~-_.- March 21, 15189 existlng 8Oftb~11 t ield at this location with two tennis courts, and ~o basketball courts that the School Board owned but the County operated and 88intained the. under a lease. He stated that there were facillties that were being used tor recreatlon at thls site. He noted that troa the tiae the property was purchased by the County in 15183 until design was ready in 1985, the Warren Henderson Wetland Act had gone into ettect that changed the juriSdiction of wetlands by the State of Florida and the County then had to go through a lengthy per- aitting process with DER, SFWMD and the Corps ot Engineers that wa. not antlcipated to be required, adding that 8Ubsequently, the initial schedule had tallen behind. Coa.issioner Shanahan questioned it there is to be a second balltield in the second phase, to which Mr. Peelc replied attir- aatively. Public Services Administrator O'Donnell stated that when Phase II of the coaaunity parlcs are started, East Naples will be the first one started. C-iv.1OD8T Shaft.8h~ 8OV'ed, 88CODded by CO8ai..10D8r ...... aDd C8ZT~ -f8O'lL81.." that the report 1'8g1t.rd1ng the &aat -«pI.. C I ty P8rk be 8CC8'pted. 1u. "1 am -"-UM rœ 'rD 8OIr11I Cuu.u UOIOIIAI. JlA.STDfAru DUDDJrr .ACD.Xna DPAllSIOIf - AIIA.IUJKD TO MILKIa COlhlluwC'l'I~ U 'rD .IIIOOJrr o. '.,268,000 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily N~s on .January 29, 1989, the Orlando Sentinel on February 5, 1989, the Tampa Tribune on January 29, 1989, and the Miami Herald on January 29, 1989, .. evidenced by Attidavit of Publication tiled with the Clerk. bids were received tor Bid .89-1356 tor the North County Regional Waste- water Treatment Plant Facilities Expansion until 2:00 P.M., March 2, lUlL Ti. Cleaons, Utilities Wastewater Director, stated that this is to award Bid 89-1356 to Mil.ir Construction, Inc. ot Jacksonville, Florida. tor the North County Regional Wastewater Treat.ant Plant Page 28 gq ---- - ...- ... March 21, 1989 tacilitiea ~ion. He stated that the bid was sent out requlrlng the base bid price tor the contractors and separate prices tor seven added alternatea. He stated that the base bid trom Mil.ir is 53,889,000 and St¿~: is recommending accepting the base bid and Alter- nate lte- 1, 2, 3, ", 5, and 1 tor a total expenditure ot S4,245,000. Mr. Ed Key. representing Consoer Townsend Associates, stated that this i8 a rebid project, adding that the original bids came in over the estiaate and rebids were let. He noted that these bids came in substantially below the original bids with only the delay in the operatlona ot the plant, adding that all the process equipaent that was planned originally tor the plant has been included lt the added alternates are accepted and he is reco..ending that the Board accept the bld ot Milair Construction with the above-noted alternates. Co..issioner Shanahan questioned it the operations building is the only thing being deleted, to which Mr. Key replied attiraatively. Mr. Cleaon& stated that the bul1ding is ottice space that ls needed but statt teels that a better cost could be obtalned it it were separate ot this contract. ""-i-.1oaer ---h.IQJ 8O'98d, 8eCODded by Ca8a.1- J 0Da" ..... aDd carrJ" --i~ly, ~t 814 '~13ðl tor the IJorth County Jtegion.al ~ 1're8t88nt racil1 ti- ~nelon be awarded to M1la1r ~JOD in the &8OUDt at '4,24ð,OOO. It- nD2 FDLU. J"OIa)DIIQ AOTIIOIUUTI08 rolt OOIJŒDI_O SDVICU WIn COJrSOD, !{-~--I' AIm ASSOCIATU, I_C. U 'fJtI AMOt1Jrr or $120,000 rea nAsa II It&GIOIIAL 1lAT'D T'UATUJrT PL.Urr .6.WD IfnLnKLD UPUSIOIf - UrmJ9&.U Mike !Cewaan, Water Director, Utilities Division, stated that this is a request tor approval ot the tinal tunding authorizatio~ tor engl- neerlng service. tor the Regional Water Treat.ent Plant and Welltield !.xpanalon, Phase II. He noted that the total addltion tor these ser- vices ls $120,000 ot which $60,000 is tor the welltield englne~r HMA & A8soclat:e6, and the reaaining 560,000 will go to Consoer Townsend tor their work on the water plant. He noted that the increase is engl- neering services tor potassium permangenate and chlorinatlon tacill- Page 29 ø ---.-- ...".."--'-'~'~._."'-"" ... -.'"c'.'.'-'." March 21, 1989 tles as -11 as corrosion investigation deterioration etfects that were occurring, along with additional inspectlon tiae and adainistra- tion by the engineers tor the project. He noted that this will allow the County under peak de.ands during tourist season to exceed the plant's noraal operating conditions and provide the additional water to the custo.ers without an expansion to the plant, adding that this is a cost saving ettort. Co..is.ioner Volpe stated that he asked that this be reaoved tro. the consent agenda in order to understand the process. Mr. "--.an stated that the tinal change order tor the plant opera- tion will be torthco.ing which covers the actual construction, adding that they are still negotiating at this t18:e with the contractor. C i..10D8r 800dnight 8OV'ed, 84tCODd8d by Co8ai-Ioner ...... aDd carr 1- -- i ~ 1'1, that the tlnal f1mc1ing authorization tor eng1- Deer 1DQ' 881"Y 1 cea w 1 th Con8r AIr, T~ and ueoc:iat.., Inc:. in the 88OaDt ot 8120,000 tor ~... II Reg1onal Mater Treataent Plant and -1111814 ""I~loa be app..ollwd. I~~ CC8DIICT T8'!8Waq .œ ~;¡~"Tlo. or cnr. BAS. PIIAS8 II (BID ---- 12M) III %IlK AlmOn CW 8231,600, IJtCLOD IJIØ U ADD I n OJI.&.L 3 3 DI. Y8 N ~ TIll: 1'IIIO.18C'T - UtrKuy&.U Solid Waste Director Fahey stated that this is a requellt to increase the amount ot expenditures necessary tor Phase II of lined Cell '6, adding that he did the design and engineering on this job and the probleas are due to his aiscalculating ot the materials required. Be stated that to meet the DER requireaent, he .ust have a cell base elevated 12 inches above the high groundwater table and the c~ll is then constructed with the base and then a permeable liner and a leachate collection system which is then covered with a two toot pro- tector layer at sand. He stated that he anticipated the aaterial would be abou t 3,000 pounds per cubic yard but the material that was purchalled was about 3,460 pounds per cubic yard. He stated that this aaterial is purchased by the ton and he was 14' short of the necessary aaount becau.e the aaterial was heavier. He indicated that the plan Page 30 'II -- ..~ ~-_._--_.- ,...---"....---..-.,.,........"". ,.,--...-,... . --... March 21, 1989 has ~ topographic aaps associated with it; one was done in 1916 and another one that was .ore recent, adding that he toolc the average ot those two and aissed the actual elevation by a halt toot. He stated that the coapacted ettort to put the baae aaterial down has had an iapact on the existing Eaterial on site which Ileana that there is an accumulative shorttall ot about 50,000 tons ot aaterial; 25 is attri- butable to the ditterence in the weight ot the lIaterial, 20,000 tons ls attributable to the dltterence in the elevation, and 5.000 tons is attributable to the compacted ettort on the existing ground. He stated that he is requesting approval tor an increase of $238,500 which will be used to purchase 50,000 tons ot material. (' i -1oDer ..... 8OV'ed, 8eCODdeð by Co8a1-iooer !Ih.n.~ aDd carr iÑ - 4-..1'1, that the contract 1ncre... for COD81:ruct1on of ce 11 ..... ft.88e I I (Bld ..8-12&6) in the 88:1ant of 8231, &00 1ncl'llilUJag 8D -....Jt..s.c..J. 13 cS.ay8 to COIIplete the project be appr~. It_~ p.TT 1'WTII&rf Jœ8T-- 1_0 k&rulcr r.oM WILSOIf, ICI LLD, ~. 8OL.L . J1E:IZ, I:K. ""'.8T>DN PItOVIDIJfO JlArD, SDD, ROAD .IJID œ.ADW:lI: ~-;[. I'OIt IIAP'LaS PItODOCTIOJr PAU: M.S.'!'.O. - UP.KUY&.U Mr. Harry Huber, Technical Services Supervisor, Capital Projects Kanageaent Otfice, stated that this item is a recommendation to accept the preliminary engineering report and provide authorlzatlon to proceed with the next 8tep in the process tor constructlon ot the as8es_ble iaprove.ents in the Naples Production Parlc. He noted that those improveaents are water aain, sani tary sewer, roadway an" drainage iaproveaents. He indicated that on August 6, 1985, the Board created the ftaples Production Park Municipal Service Taxing and Benetit Unit and subsequently selected Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll 61 Peek, Inc. 8S the conlfUltant to provide the engineering services required tor the design ot the proposed improveliConts. He noted that they have coapleted the study and report phase ot the project and have produced the preliminary engineering report which has been revi...ed by Statt and was also submitted to the City ot "aples and Colller County Utilities Division tor review and coaaent. He noted that as a result, Page 31 'Þ- .......... .."......,",..-,..,.-,-"..........- -""-' March 21, 1989 the report is acceptable subject to detalls that will be addressed under final design stages. He stated that the next step would be an adoptlon of a resolution ordering the acquisition and construction ot the a..essable improvements and at that time, the cost would be addressed as well as the method of asses..ent and the a.sessment roll. He stated that the total preliminary cost in the report i. $5.696.0.5 which includes the esti.ated acquisition costs ot easements and rights-of-way. engineering, legal and financial costs relatlve to the improv..-nts. Co..lssioner Volpe stated that the Flnance Director has ralsed an lssue concerning the reco..endation ot .tatt which is that the County n89otlate with the consultant to bring the County into the next phase ot the project and the question has been asked it these services were included in the original contract? Mr. Huber stated that the Board entered into an agreeaent with the consultant and that aQr.ement did provlde provlsions tor all the services that are required tor constructlon, adding that there was a specific dollar aaount tor the study and report phase. He noted that the agreement also set torth the cost tor the succeeding stages, but there was no specitic dollar aaoun t, it was based on a percentage ot the estimated cost ot construction which was not known at that tilDe. He noted that in order to pay for the tinal design cost there will have to be approval tor an additional tax levy or a bond anticipation note which he will have to bring back to the Board at a later time. ~1..1c:m8r Shanah_ft aaved, -.coD4ed by Co8a1..100er ..... and carr 184 -- 1 8O'U8 1 y, that the Board acc4rpt the preliainary 8'D(Ji.oeer1Dg' r~.t-t: 88thorlze preparatlon ot the initl"l r81lO1utlon orderinq 8Cq1L1altlCG 8Dd CODatru.ctlon ot ""'sable illprov.....nte IIDd I!tUthor1za atûf U pr"8p8.r8 IIDd negot1ate an alJTalnMDt with the COD8'Ultant to P4-~ ~ tiDal de81gn tor the proposed lçrov.....nt. .in the llapl- 1"1 ~ t Ua Park IISTU. Report on tile in the Clerk's ottice. lu.~ ~& n 'lD II&PL&8 PItODOCTIOli P.a.u PItOI"DTY 08arD8 ASaocurIOIf ro ~..... I81:D.D8 Pa\YIJIG IMPJW.,_&~ wrn:nr ru IU.PLKS PItODOCTIOli P.a.u ".a.r.V. AIm ~U A TAX AJrTICIPArIOli IIOTK - "'rlWY&.U Page 32 'If ~ ., " "M"" '_."'~""'-"."""-"."-- March 21, 1989 Mr. Harry Huber, Technical Services Supervisor, Capital Projects Manage..nt otti~., stated that this is a recommendation to approve a request by the Naples Production Park Property Owners Association to provlde interi. paving i.provements wlthin the Naples Production Farlc MSTU to provide sater traveling conditions until the proposed improve- ments are co.pleted. He noted that the actual construction ot the proposed iaprove.ents is about one year trom now and in the interim they would like the paving improvements done. He indicated that the cost to do this work would be approxi88tely $25,630 and there is currently approxi.ately $13,000 in the initial tax levy monles. He noted that there is a shortfall ot approximately $12,600 and the pro- perty owners association are asking that there be a tax levy initiated during the next tiscal year to aalce up the ditterence. He noted that there are several conditions relative to this recommendation, one being that the County Transportation Depart.ent or the County would not be obligated to perform any turther 88intenance other than what is indicated above until the proposed improvements tor the assessment district are completed and accepted or without prior Board approval and appropriate reiaburse.ent and that a tax antlcipation note be obtained to provide the additional tunds not currently aval1able. c-1..100er Volpe 8OVed, eec0n4e4 by C0881..ioner ...... end carr 1" 1ID8D 1IIcru81 y, that the request by the _apl.. Prodaction Park Prop.rty OWner. A8eociatlon to provlde 1nter18 paving !ap£ow---nta .1tb~ the 8aple. Production Park N.S.T.O. be approved end . tax ant1- clpatlOG DOte be autborlz:*<! to t1n.ance the detlclt. It- .11.A.1A2 JOINaT ""--1...,..4 It-l41/U2 UD 89-1U/IU - ADOPTED c- 1 .. 1 ODe r CJooðn i gh t 8OVed, ..cODded by Co8a1.a1cmer ..... 8Dd carr 1.. --- 1 8Q1I.81 y, that 8a4get A88nd8ent. 11-1.1/142 end 19-14./1.5 be 8IIIopt:ed. There was discussion regarding the tabulation ot contracts and Finance Director Yonxosxy stated that his Start is getting ready to sub.it another .onthly report. Page 33 iff , -.---... ""'."""'---'.--"-"'.'."-"'."".' .. ...--,..-.. ,...--........ .. ,- ~.. .. ~~. March 21, 1989 It- nu USOtoO"n08 ..-71 APPOIftIJrG Ma. rRAn L. ImKSD TO TO IIAJIC() I SL.IJID n.a.unFICArIOJI AD'TISORY COMMITTn - ADOPnD Administrative Assistant to the Board Israelson stated that there are two rellUlles in the executive paclcet and one was recelved atter the deadline tro. a Mr. Salvatore Scareno, adding that the Marco Island s.autltication Advisory Co..lttee is reco..ending that Mr. rranlc Meeslce be appointed. C- i -1oa.r ~ h.an 8D'Y8d, eeccmded by Co8a1..1oner 1Ia8- aDd carr 1 ed ~ i 8nQ8 I." that Re8olutlon 89-77 appo1ntlng Mr. hank L. M8e8b to the Mllrco I.land Beautification Advl80ry Co8aitt.. be 8do¡rt eel. Page 34 L/$' ,.."...,_."..,.,., .,.."".",..,.",,- "..-.._._-~,...,,-- March 21, 1989 1u. ~D ~Q8 ...78 APPOIJrrIJIG 1Gl. PAUL CDVALID AJm UAPI'OIJrlDIGI Jat. TQf .J'C888 TO tD -TD N~T .&.1WIsoaT 8OAItD - &.DOrTlW C-i..1cIa8r a.-......, 8O'98d, 8e(;0Ddec2 by eo-.tm.100er ~lg:ht 8Dd carr 184 ~ t -..1"1 , tb.a t Ite8o 1 u t ion . ~ 7 I appo in t 1ng 1Ir. P8ul Cbin'a11er 8Dd r ~ in t 1ng 1Ir. TOIl .7 0De8 t 0 the .. t 81." --.g í .. t ~ 8e8ri be 8døpted. Pag8 3ð 1('1 -.. .-... -,~,"."._,.., ..............--...-........ .'---."..' .._~ March 21, 1989 laa'ft2C ~--'-\I -'-.._pox DTAllLISBDIØ TO caIJIDtAL .7D8TIa ~0Ir .Z8..- t- -.1.10 - Uf.........a.u Co8aissioner Saunders stated that thls was added on as an e..rgency because the Public Detender's ottice subaitted this agreeaent indicating that it needed to be approved in order to receive so.. aatching tundø. Assistant County Attorney Weigel stated that he has reviewed thl. and he he. no problea with it. Clerk Giles stated that this is basically the same agreement that has been in place tor the last two years with the C.JIS Council tor the 20th 3udlcial Circuit, adding that a deadline is test approaching ln order to recelve the aatching tunds. C' t -1.aD8'r --""'r . 8:J9'8d, ~ by ec-1..1C1G11r ~h-, aDd carr 181 1-.17, that the 1.nterloca.l agr..-.nt ~lj~jl1g the Cri_t_1 .l88't1ce 1D.tor.ation 8y8t- CoaDc11 be ap..,rov..4. Page 36 t/rt ....-. . ---".,._".~.._..._................".. .._._..~...",..".,.~--, March 21, 1989 It- n2D Ovv.,u &.1n,.w...r .um STAn AI:1TJIOaIDJ) TO OTILID nm SDVICU OJ! ç,u¡,ft8 rnt.zI8 W'Ift .PAImS TO nr:a DAL'nI rACILITIU 8UtLDIJfG Co..is.ion~r Saunders stated that there is a potential problem Kith the contractor in ter- ot the piling -vstea to be used and he telt it ls necessary to give a report to the Co..isslon on what the potential proble- are, adding that he would also like to authorize the County Attorney to obtain appropriate counsel and take whatever actlon Is necessary to protect the County'. legal interest. Mr. To. Conrecode, Capital Projects Management, stated that with regards to th~ Health and Public Services Building, Carlson Corporation was given a notice to proceed in early January which was tollowed by a pre-construction conterence. He indicated that during this aeeting. Carlson Corporation proposed an alternate toundation syste. called an auga-pressure grouted pile, adding that this system Is design~ to support a building the ...e as any other pillng -vste.. He not~ that this type ot syste. could be done quicker and with less disruptlon to the neighbors in the Glades. He noted that a Change Order was issued to the contractor and they were told to go ahead with the auga-grouted syste., noting that there was to be no addltlonal cost to the County and it the system tailed the County could dlrect that the Contractor go back to the original plle syste. at no addi- tional cost to the County. He noted that there were three ditterent test plIes put into the ground and they all tailed and were rejected by the County structural engineer. He noted that the County 1. looking to their consultant to tind out the best suitable solution. He .tat~ that he received some correspondence trom the consultant stating that they are directing Carlson Construction to go back to the original piling syate.. Coaaissioner Saunders questioned it there is any work belng done on the .ite at this time, to which Mr. Conrecode stated that tt.ere is site work being done, but no toundation work. Coaaissioner Saunders questioned it Carlson Construction has Page 37 ~"'j -..,..-",...-..-----...--.-.,.-- ,-,_.._, March 21, 1989 de~ acre aoney becau.e ot this systee, to which Mr. Donegan, Project Manag~:-, stated that they had ad11tional charges tor delay ot tie. and for additional test work as well as for additlonal length ot pilings. He noted that he does not have a cost proposal at this tl.e from thea. He lndicated that the number that they had tor the general conditlons was approxiaately $8~,000 but the cost will be .ore when the other ite- are added. Co..issioner Saunders stated that he has heard flgure. ot approxl- aately $130,000. adding that tro. a legal standpoint, the County is in good shape, but there appears that there aay be some contlict torth- coaing and be would lilce statt to have the appropriate legal counsel available to the., like the la,... fir. of Carlton Fields. As.istant County Manager McLeeore stated that he agree. wi th Co..1ssioner Saunders on this aatter and would like to be able to have Carlton Pields aval1able in the beginning in case there is a problee. C t-1CD8T ~r1I ~, 88CO'Dd8d by ec-1- 1 ooer --- aDd carr 1.ed -- t -..1 y, that the County Attorney be autbor.tze.d to 1Itll1ze Carltoa r1eld:8 wlth ntga.rd8 to the -tter concernln.g Carl8OD Co¡:a.-_Uoa aDd the "alth Servlc- Ba.11d.1DQ'. hpe .. It- ftU ~08 or ~ÐÞO.&.1) AT DIIIOE.ALD co....,.~n PAItX rea D8ÐEALD az- 8C.aOOI. - U;riwY&.U Coaaissioner Goodnight stated that Pepsi Cola has ottered laaoltalee High School two scoreboards; one tor the high school toot- ball tield that the School Board owns and the other tor the b..eball t1eld that i. on County property. She stated that there are no regu- latlone tor the Parlcs & Recreation Depart.ent and the School Board has agreed to put up the scoreboard, but Pepsi Cola has asked the laaoltalee High School to sell only Pepsi products tor the next tive years. She indicated that Collier County's na.e is not on any docu- _ntation, theretore, a scoreboard could be placed on the County ballt ield that would be utilized by the County without any restric- tion.s. Page 38 5' . _'0""'_.'-.-.--"-.'--"-'.'-.'.-- ---... March 21, 1989 C . - s.c.-r -..".., t gb t 8OV8CS, 88G0Dð8d by ec-.i_1cmer m.-..... 8Dd C8rr 1e4 -- i -.. 1 '1, that CoUl.r County allow 1'ep81 Cola aDd the 8ctaool 8acrd to p1ac:e a acoreboe.rð at tbr8 b8eebe.ll t 1.1d at the T-"-~ C ity Park. C0881s.1oner Shanahan questioned it the County 18 golng to go exclu.ively with Pepsi Cola, to which Public Services Adalnistrator O'Donnell replied negatively. adding that this restrlctlon wll1 apply only to the scoreboard at the I..okalee High School. He noted that Start has no objection to this aatter. ..... c-1_100er Goodnight 8OVed, eecon&td by Co8a1_ioner a.-........ aDd carried unan 18N81." that the tol1ow1DQ' 1 t- 1IDðer the eon...nt Agenda be aPPlov*<! and/or adopted: ..... It- .1u.1 rua.,.,""""- I.&TrD or CJtKDIT I- LI&'O or A PDJ"ORIIA.JrC8 IIOIID JOlt .uœDLT 'fITT ., ~.~UR AT JtOTAL MOOD OOLl' ØD <Nu.un Ct.O'B !? /" See Page. .J., ¡ - .; I. I I t8a n...u rDI&L I'IoA1' œ 8C8D8U. I.AJtU AT rD VDQT.utDs BOLl' UD '^AI_¡;&. Ct.O'B - .""01 n.IIVI.AnOllll 1. That the final plat not be recorded until the required i.pro- veaents have been constructed and accepted or until approved security is received tor the incoapleted improveaents and that construction shall be co.pleted within 36 months ot the date ot this approval. 2. That the Utilities Pertoraance Bond requlred pursuant to Ordinance 88-76 be waived (this worlc will be covered by aain- tenance security to be provlded by the Developer pursuant to Ordinance 76-6) and that a aaintenance security tor ten (10) percent ot the total cost ot construction ot all lntrastruc- ture i.proveaents (water, sewer, road and drainage) be pro- vided on co.pletion and preli.inary acceptance ot the project b)i the County, tor a period ot one year. It8a ~U.3 rnr.u. PLAT or LlU.Y ~ 8u.cJI 08'I1' TWO - WID S"lIPULAnOll ØD (-oIhJ ...."". ~08 j.JII) JIADr1'DAJIC'K &n'8~DI...rr 1. Letter ot Credit as security to guarantee completion ot the subdivision improvements to be accepted and Construction and Maintenance Agree.ent. See Pages 43,,11, 1- A, 6 It8a n4.U TMO ft&n POSI1'X088 1'0 8Urrulla rD PItO<Ø.UØ or rD JrØLT CUATKD CODlt .....-~.I .. 8QAItD, IIOUSIJIQ COOK ØD wnr. nrsncrIO- P'ttOOPA. ~ne Compliance Otticer and one Secretary I Page 3i ,.. -{'J , ".. ......,..__...,. ...__..~,.,-,._-,.. March 21, 1985Þ 1u. ~"1 1IJt8OUn'XCJ8 "'-7' fillI\i'UOILU.LT CI..LSSIFTDI'G D8ÐKALD JtOAJ) (C.Il. U6) AS A IILJOIt COLL8CTOIIl ROAD I. COLLID. ~.;[ x Co..issioner Goodnight questioned it this .ean8 that the State 18 not going to take this road back, to which Public Works Administrator Archlbald r~lled attiraatively. He noted that the County wants to aaintaln this as a County road until the i.prove8ents are aade and then at that point in tiae, lt Mill be subject to a claasltlcation study. See Page ;,t3- ß. / Iu. ~." See Pages -CJ1f' ðøø~ /P.?( Iu. ~~ 8Ø'&"8cI to ftD2 Iu. ~Ø1 .A88T l 1;. -- oM..&JID ---'.......-;r OJ' L&.I.SZ AG.1l1IUIrt HI--- ~ u.n 8OQ'ft - ~ 8CC I'OIt mrrr 1 S , ØULJ' Ø.A TIt sour!I, IIIrI CJI """".&..uaø J'OII 'rD Mat rw .. .... I'OIt A SO'8ST A rI 011 See Pages If 3. (!. I - C.;J. I~n~ ~a- ~4._lfx UD STAx\/XVlltx DUD m 1IUU'&a&II\i& 1'0 'rD ur.a OJ' ~ II I1f 8OLDaI 8.A TIt UTA T'&S (AVAn.. PItOPDTIU. IJIIC.) See Pages If '3 -Ì). I - /), .3 It- n6111 D~CJ8 OJ' IlI"I' ..9-138. UD .LPPOIJrt'.NI...:r or A COlfauloT.urt :lKI.KCT:IOIf oa.kL .II . - TO 08TA.IJr no rus I oa.u. 8DVI CD I'OIt TO caLL I D. """ If .I :II MACII ~ - - .....-n.. -:r 1'.oJ"KCTS Harry Huber, Technical Services Supervisor, OCPM Brian MacKenzie, Assistant to the County Manager Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director Milliaa Lorenz, P.E., Environmental Services Adainistrator Chr is Ho lley, Co..unity Services Director, City ot Naples Iu. n.au It88OI.8"rZO8 ...-eo cœl'X8UJIO TO cauTIO. or TO PI.a IlIDCD ~ PA8lt 8.'. T . If. &lID A.S8USIGDrT DIsnIC'T UD PItOVIDIJIO 1'JI.AT 'rD A'-' I V.ll J'ItOC;a.uu-. SJI.ALL 8& L&V2KD UD DIPOSKD POUO.urt 1'0 COLLID """".&11 C8DDIA8C& "-23 See Pages -~~~ - 1- f:~ 1~ naa usourn:D8 8..-.1 COII'J'IJalIJIO TO CJtUTIOII OJ' 'rD IIOaT1I IIAPLU ~Dll.AT ..'.T.U. .um ....n8lD'1' DISTJlIC'T &lID PItOVIDIJIU 1'JI.AT TO ua&6~ .... 60 ..--..---- March 21. 1... 11M)- ... 88ALI. .. LKVIED AJID IMPOSED PUDUAII'r TO COLLI.D. 1.õUU. ¡;)I \oÖJ- e M-2J !'lee Pages ~.":J-F. J - F, :J... X t88 n 06&6 ~08 ---.. DlDIcmATIW TO InTUL TDDIII ar OWIC8 ... TO -w AI'PO~ TO TO IIA8CO ISLIJIt) .........-1: aEIIOOU_ .-z ~~.a;¡;- See Page Jj. 3--Y. / I U8 4t1.... 8m ..9-1He fta ""~.&L AJID TtJU SPIt.I.n- J'OJt TO II&.8CO ISLUD 8U117rUIe&nC8 . . . . l' . u. - AK&JmU) TO A... C . PEST 0uIt;¡- IQ,lIo :or 'fI[8 AM:Xrn ar '.,On.50 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 1, 1989, as evidenced by Attidavit ot Publlcation flIed with the Clerk, bl48 were received until 2:30 P.M., February 15, 1989, tor orn&88ntal and turt spraying tor the Marco Island Beautlticatlon MSTU. Iu. ft48 Ca8rt~ to ././11 Iu. n4U 8IIY --.. L .L IJ8 1II'I'ODr1'D 1'0 'fI[8 CIOI.D8JI 8.\1'8 C~II ~1'T ,-,;.. ADVJ:~ ~...~ 88TIto 1MKa-.1( 31. lHO It88 ft4o.Jl <.~ . .r~ - oe-":II(Ik,"%'lOil TO TO TAX JtOLL AS nD...-zau In' 'fI[8 ~ T:tI ~TRIII'. orrIC'8 1988 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1988-82/84 311189 - 3113/89 1988 TAX ROLL 208 2/16189 212 2/16/89 216/216 3/06/89 I U8 ft 4o.J2 IXDA ... nr T1J8 rea I88A 1'8 1108. eUI., 01421, 421158, 08... I~ ft4o.JJ Nn8FACTI08 or- (.I&a"__rolt SDVICU or ~I"uDL!C Dü&a"U&.I( See Pages 43-H,I- H. /2- Xu. n4o.J a-."~ ~bl'vllDIDfCIt - nLED AJID/Olt ItUDJUW There being no objection, the Chair directed that the tollowing .iscellaneous correspondence be tiled and/or reterred to the varloum depart..nts ao indicated below: Page 41 f'I - . _.. ,-. ,.".--.-.....-.-,,-..,.....,,--,..,. .'-_.'-'------ -.- - March 21, 1989 1. Public Notice dated 3/9/89 trom the Dept. ot the Aray advising that an application has been received tor a permit to do 88intenance dredging at Clam Pass by Collier County. xc: ;:eil Dorrill; George Archibald; Kevin O'Donnell; and Piled. 2. Order on Motion to Strilce dated 3/7/89 re Case No. 88-2U~-CA-O1, Circuit Court ot Collier County, regarding Crossland Savings, PSB, Plantitt, vs. Arthur M. Robert!!!, et al. Detendants. xc: Ken Cuyler; Piled. 3. Letter dated 3/9/89 tro. Robert K. Lot Un, Environmental Specialist, DER, encloslng short tor. application, Pile No. 111617045, which involves dredge and till activities. xc: .eil Dorrill (letter); Bill Lorenz; and P fled. .. Letter dated 3/8/89 tro. Patriclc Kenney, Environaental Specialist, DER, enclosing short tor. application, File No. 111616475, which involves dredge and till actlvities. xc: lfe il Dorr ill (letter); Bill Lorenz; and Piled. 5. Letter dated 3/7/89 tro. Trudie Bell, Environ.ental Specialist. DER. enclosing a standard tor. application (Pile "0. 111616199, Collier County), whlch involves dredge and till activities. xc; Neil Dorr ill (letter); Bill Lorenz; and Piled. 6. Letter dated 3/8/89 tro. Philip R. Edwards, Deputy A.sistant Secretary, DER, advising ot unauthorized dredging, t !lling and aangrove alteration by Lely Development Corporatlon. xc: acc; and Filed. 7. Letter dated 3/10/89 trom Robert K. Lot lin, Environmental Specialist, DER, enclosing short tor. application, rile No. 111617545, which involves dredge and till activities. xc: Ifeil Dorrill (letter); 8ill Lorenz; and Filed. 8. Letter dated 3/9/89 trom Robert K. Lot lin, Environmental Specialist, DER, enclosing a short tor. appllcation, Pile No. 11161698~, which involves dredge and till actlvities. xc: .ell Dorrill (letter); Bill Lorenz; George Archibald; and Piled. 9. Letter dated 3/6/89 trom Gary J. Clarke, Assistant Secretary tor Medicaid, HRS, notitying Collier County ot its aax laua tinancial obligation under the Health Care Respon8ibl1ity Act tor the 1988/89 tiscal year. xc: BCC; Ne il Dorr ill; Kevin O'Donnell; Lori Zallea; and Piled. 10. Heaorandua dated 3/8/89 trom Gary J. Clarke, Assistant Secretary tor Medicaid, HRS, regarding training sess~ons tor the Health Care Respon6ibility Act and the Shared County and State Health Care Program. xc: Jfe il Dorr ill; Kevin O'Donnell; Martha Skinner; and Piled. 11. Minutes received and tiled: A. 3/1/89 - Marco Island Beachtront Renourishaent Adv. Co_. B. 2/7/89 - Marco Island Beautitication Board C. 3/16/89 CCPC Agenda D. 2/14/89 Golden Gate Parkway Beautitication Adv. Co_. II 3/14/89 Agenda 12. lfotice to OWner dated 3/6/89 tro. "aples Lumber II Supply Co., lor.. advising that they have turnished varlous buildlng aaterial tor the i.proveaent ot Collier Health II Publlc Services Building, under an order given by Carlson Page 42 .$f . ..... .".",,-,-. ,---,.,-." March 21, 1989 Corporation Southeast. xc: Nell Dorrill; Skip Caap; and riled. 13. Letter dated 3/9/89 troa Mike Mannlx, Dlstrict Adalni.trator, Real Property Manage.ant, FOOT, advising that it is not possible to extend the notlce ot lease cancellation tor pro- perty on Alligator Alley and I-15 & S.R. 29. xc: Neil Corri)l; and Piled. 14. Letter dated 3/1/89 fro. M. R. Tretz, P.E.. Dlstrict Secretary, FDOT, in reterence to FDOT's notitication letter of 2/23/89 which advised of the scheduled transfer ot roadway segwents to Collier County. xc: George Archibald; Walt Carter; and Piled. ".. There being no further business tor the Good of the County, the aeeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Ti.e: 3:35 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO.ZRS/ BOARD or ZONING APPEALS/EX OrrICIO GOVERXING BOARD(S) or SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ..... M.~HAI-' A~ : . > . v..... .1~ C. GILU, ~~ ... . ;~~k.z£ --4;. 5J <" . . , , The~e ~1nùtes approved by the Board on ~/ //. /JI1 as presented ~ or as corrected Page 43 rt ----"-'.'." - - ----. - -...-...... ......-....-....,...-......-