BCC Minutes 05/09/1989 R
Naples, Florida, May 9, 1989
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having con~ucted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR 8ES8IO. in Building
"P" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Burt L. Saunders
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Max A. Hasse, 3r.
Richard S. Shanahan
Anne Goodnight
(Absent) Michael 3. Volpe
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
D1rector; El11e Hottman, Maureen Kenyon, and Annaliese Kraft, Deputy
Clerks; Neil Dorrill, County Manager; Ron McLemore, Assistant County
Manager; Tom Olliff, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler,
County Attorney; Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator;
George Archibald, Transportat10n Services Admin1strator; Frank Brutt,
Coamunity Development Adminißtrator; George Barton, EMS D1rector;
3ames Reardon, Emergency Services Ad~inistrator; Denise Coleman, Home
Economics Program Leader, Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator;
William Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; Sue Filson,
Secretary To The Board; and Deputies Tom Storrar and Sam Bass,
Sheriff's Otfice.
)
Page 1
,- """,---'
,-----,
MAY 9, 1989
Tape.1
It- n
... ./0 vot.. indicat. C088i..ioner Volpe'. ab8enc.. ...
AGDDA UD ConEn' AGEJrDA - APPROVED WITH CBA8GES
CO8a1..ioner Shanahan 8QV8ð, _coD4ed by CO881_ioner Goodnight
and carried ./0, that the agenda and cOlUMnt agen4a be approved with
the following chang8.:
1. Item 6'd1 - DOA-88-3C, Vensel and Associates, Inc., repre-
senting Deltonn Corporation, requeeting an amendment to the
Marco Shores Development Order by reducing density, providing
for till for the four-laning of S.R. 9!H as a fair share
contribution towards its four-laning, provide for a certain
time when resi'ential traffic from Unit 30 may access S.R.
951 prior to the tour-laning, other tha~ through Unit 27,
deleting the causeway road connecting Unit 30 and Unit 27,
changing community district language, provide for users of
the northern 18 hole golf course in Unit 30, and provide for
enforcement of the Marco Shores Development Order - Continued
to 6113/89 (Petitioner's Request).
2. Item 6B2 - Petition PDA-88-9-C, Vensel and Associates, Inc.,
representing Deltona Corporation, requesting an amendment to
the Marco Shores Planned Unit Development by reducing the
density, provide for additional preservation of wetlands and
provide for a certain time when residential development foz'
Unit 30 can be allowed to access S.R. 951 other than throulå'h
Unit 27, until that time all access will be from U.S. 41 -
Continued to 6/13/89.
3. Item 9A1 - Appeal of Case 6W89-0172 - Nuisance Abatement -
Withdrawn, per Petitioner's request.
4. Item 9A2 - Recommendation to provide direction regarding the
Audubon Country Club fence and associated PUD amendment -
Continued to 5/23/89, per Petitioner's request.
ð. Itell 9C 1 - Added. Report to the Board on the status of nego-
tiations between the Vineyards, the School District and the
County, regarding acquisition of School and County Park
Property
6. Item 9M3 - Added. Recommendation to approve and execute a
contract with Florida State University for provision of
Mediation Services.
7. Item 12A - Discussion re Mandatory Solid Waste Collection -
Cont1nued to 5/23, per Commissioner Volpe's request.
8. Windsor Park Subdivision: Water and Sewer Stipulation amend-
ments approval - Continued to 5/16, as requested by County
Attorney.
9. Item 14D4 Moved to 9D3 - Recommendation to approve final
Change Order 1:4 to Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc. contract
for Regional Water Plant - Phase 2.
It- .aA
DCPt.OTU aDVICE AJQJU) - p:!KSD'RJ)
Commissioner Saunders presented an Employee Service Award and pin
to Bill Finch of Parks and Recreation tor 5 years of service with 1
Page 2
,..,.,.,.-.",..,-.
_uuu_-
MAY 9, 1989
Collier County Govern..nt.
I~- .U
8UJIu'XU M 8CC tmGOLAJt ØX'fI.O8 OW APRIL 11 UD 25, 1 9 8 9 - A.PPKOVKD AS
~aiI;¡~
cc-1_ioner Goodnight 8O'V8d, seconded by C0881..ioner shaD8han
8Dd carried ./0, ~hat the .inut- of the BCC Regular ...tiDQ8 of April
11 8Dd 25, 1119, be approved" pr...nted.
It- ~B
~'fI0JI DKSIcaA'fI.G 'fD nu OW MAY U - 20, 1 III AS - '1'UCD1\
J.Pn&ÇIA'fIO. nø - - ADOPTED
Upon reading of the of proclamation, coaai..ioner Ib."_han aaved,
aecODdecS by coaai..ioner Baa" and carried ./0, that the procl...tion
de8ignating ~he ....11:: of May U - 20, 1981 .. -Teacher Appreciation
...11::- be aðopted.
Mrs. Mary cunningham. teacher at Pine Ridge Middle School,
accepted the proclamation and thanked the Commission tor their support
and recognition on behalf of all the teachers in Collier County.
?
Page 3
---
-,-, ---"""-~'
--
MAY ~, 1989
It- ftC
PIt()CI.AIIA'fI08 DUICDIA'fl8G 'fD ØB OJ' MAY 8, 1989 AS .COOPDAl'IVE
5A'l'_$I08 WJI.rt.. - .\DOPTKJ)
Upon reading of the proclamation, C088i..ioner Goodnight 8QV8ð,
aeçoDðecI by c~..ioner 8h-",_han and carried ./0, that the pro<:l...-
Uon ðe8igD8tlng the week of May 8. 1989.. .cooperative Kxtenaion
Week. be 8ðop1: ed.
Mr. Edward Oates, Chairman of the Extension Advisory Committee,
accepted the proclamation. He stated that it is the 1ðth birthday of
the Extension Service.
Hoae Econoaics prograa Leader Denise Coleman, advised that the
Extension Service began in 1950 in Collier County. She reported that
Staff enjoys their relationship in Collier County and they look for-
ward to providing this service for a long time.
/0
Page 4
. "--,,, -""""",,-
MAY 9, 1989
11:- nD
PBODU AI8AJU) CDTUICATK8 TO DIS PØSOJIJfKL - PftZSDTKD
Co..issioner Saunders read a scenario describing EMS personnel
responding to a call from a local restaurant where a man was having a
heart attack. Upon arrival, the man was lying on the floor, and he
was clinically dead. Me related that five days later the man was
released froll the hospital and able to keep a golf date later that
wenk.
Commissioner Saunders disclosed that the Phoenix Award is the
highest honor bestowed upon EMS Personnel. He presented awards to
EMS personnel who have successfully revived a victim of sudden death,
as follows:
Richard Bardell Noemi Praguela (2)
Chris Pluamer Valerie Thorsen
Anne Hare (2) Jorge Aguilera
Randy Carroll Debbie Carney
Thomas Maguire Frank Suriano (absent)
Belen Ortega (2) Dave Kitchen
Nancy Kreieburg John Katzenberger
Erin Suaaers Theres. Ortengren
John Poczynski (not present) Gary Leshinsky
David MacGregor, 3r. (2) Jetfery Page (absent)
Douglas Cameron J'ranlt MUlot (2)
Beverly Fields (not present)
Commissioner Saunders reported that Frank Millot has now received
a total ot 5 Phoenix Awards. He presented Mr. Millot with a gold
Phoenix pin for his achievement.
Emergency Services Administrator Reardon advised that EMS person-
nel encounter victims of trauma with no life signs. He disclosed that
their responses enabled 21 victims and their tamilies to have a nice
day. He assured the Commission and the citizens of Collier County
that these are the "best of the best", and there are 40 additional EMS
personnel who work all three shifts.
EMS Director Barton advised that the two things paramedics enjoy
doing during their daily runs are delivering babies, and facing a
.code blue" situation where life has ceased. He reported that taese
paramedics step in and display professionalism where their actions
count. Me thanked the Commission for appreciating and recognizing the
¡:r
Page ð
"-",, ,-"."".. "-",,,--',-
,,--- ,.,--
MAY 9, 1989
par...dic..
Co..is.ioner Saunders commended the EMS employees for their ser-
vice to Collier County.
It- 8Cl
C8DDIIoIIC8 1"21, PItOVIDI80 rea 'fD DIPOSITIO8 O. 'lD SIX 0D'f8 LOCAL
orn08 8&8 'fAX UPOJI KVDY G.ILLOII O. MO1'OIt n7EL UD SRCIAL .-on SOLD
18 OOLLID euu.:r; 11 TO U ERKC'fIn SKPrDIBD 1, 1919 rea A PERIOD O.
'I'D TUIt8 - AÞO rT 5U
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 20, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an ordinance pursuant
to Section 336.025, Florida Statutes, providing for the imposition of
the six cents local option gas tax upon every gallon of motor fuel and
.pecial fuel sold in Collier County and taxed under the provisions ot
Chapter 206, Florida Statutes; providing that said tax shall be effec-
tive September 1, 1989 for a period of ten years; providing findings
and purpose; providing for collection and distribution of the tax and
providing for distribution of the tax and providing for use of reve-
nues; providing for conflict and severability; providing for repeal of
Ordinances Nos. 84-46 and 85-38; and effective date.
Transportation Services Adminiøtrator Archibald stated that this
item is a public hearing to consider an ordinance to extend the six
cent. local option gas tax for a period of 10 years. He advised that
in 1983, Florida Statutes 336 was amended with a provision that
local governments meet their transportation needs by considering the
option of a gas tax. He reported that in 1984 and 1985, prev.1ous
Board's approved ordinances levying gas taxes in Collier County. Me
'~dicated that Collier County was one of the first County's within the
state to do this.
Mr. Archibald explained that the user and those who benefit by
road improvements pay a fair share of those improvements through the
gas tax. He advised that the six cents gas tax is important in
Collier County with regard to road construction and road maintenance
programs, noting that of the 6C tax allocated, 4C is used for :1.ew
IS
Page 6
-"
,.",------'.'
,~.-
".,.,.-..
MAY 9, 1989
construction which is 35~ ot the County's total revenue for new
construction. Me replied that 2Ç ot the 6ç per gallon is used for
aaintenance programs, and this represents 30~ of the County's total
revenue for road maintenance.
Mr. Archibald mentioned that the Five and Ten Year Road Plans r61y
heavily on the six cents gas tax, since they have a need for those
revenues for a long period of time. Me advised that the intended
ordinance provides for a 10 year period, beginning September 1, 1989,
and extending to August 31. 1999. Me noted that collection of the gas
taxes are through the ~~ate Department of Revenue.
Mr. Archibald advised that the ordinance makes provisions for an
Interlocal Agreement since the option gas tax will be used by Collier
County, the City of Naples, and Everglades City. Me noted that if the
ordinance is adopted today, Staff will continue negotiations with the
two cities regarding the pro ration between the three parties. He
advised that currently, the Agreement allocates 80.15~ of the tax
dollars to Collier County, 19.10~ to the City of Naples, and .75~ to
the City of Everglades. Me indicated that the transportation system
throughout the County will benefit ~y the option gas tax.
Mr. Archibald reported that it should be noted that the two
current ordinances which implement the option gas tax in place, will
be repealed by adoption of this ordinance. Me advised that this
gas tax has many advantages over other forms of tax, in that, it is a
user fee system where the people benefiting are paying a good amount
of the cost for road improvements. Me mentioned that the Board ot
County Commissioners has the power to levy and the power to repeal the
gas tax, noting that this becomes an important segment, should in fact
other revenue sources become available at some future point in time.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Archibald stated that the
current formula that is set forth in the current Interlocal Agreement
was based upon a review ot prior five year expenditures by the City of
Naples and Collier County, noting that the formula in place reflects
an analysis fro. an accou~ting standpoint of expenditures by the
/if
Page 7
,.""."..' ",..."
".,
MAY 9, 1989
respective parties. He reported that the revenue streaa co.ing in to
the County and the Cities remain essentially the same, and it is
likely that the percentages, based upon revenue will also remain the
sa.e. He indicated that the gas taxes received by the County and the
City will be continuing, and the allocation of those expenditures will
reaain about the same on a percentage basis.
Co..issioner Saunders stated that the formula that is being used,
is one that is set by the Statutes. Mr. Archibald replied
art iraatively.
ec-1_icmar Ih--.Þ..n 8QV8ð, seconded by C0881..ioner Ba8- and
carried 4./0, to clo- the public hearing.
Co8ai..ioner Sþ_n.hen 8QV8ð, _conded by C088i..ioner Ba8- and
carr ieeS anan 18OU8 1 y, that the ordinance - nuabered and titled below
be 8ðop'ted in accordance with JI/.e8o1ution 8t-80, and entered into
Or41DaDce Book .0. 3ð; authorize the Chairaan to 8X8CUte the ordi-
n8DCe; -vr"ov. aDd authorize the Chairaan to axecute an Interlocal
Agr....nt, aDd authorize the County Attorney to proce.. the Aqr...-nt
to tb8 City ot .apl.. and the City of KYerglað8. tor approval/8X8CU-
tion.
OIU) IJIAJICZ 8 9- 21
ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 336.02ð, FLORIDA STATUTES, PROVIDING
FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE SIX CENTS LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX UPON
EVERY GALLON OF MOTOR FUEL AND SPECIAL FUEL SOLD IN COLLIER COUNTY
AND TAXED UNDER TME PROVISIONS OF CMAPTER 206, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING THAT SAID TAX SHALL BE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 1989 FOR
A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS; PROVIDING FINDINGS AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING
FOR COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OP TME TAX AND PROVIDING FOR USE
OF REVENUES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES NOS. 84-46 AND 85-38; AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
l{
Page B
---,,--,,- . ^""-,---,,,--
MAY 9, 1989
It- ftC2
IJITDLOI"-AL r#JY,U"-'" UL AtJJtDMD'f U'1'WD8 'I'D COO1IT'l UD 'I'D CITY or
JU.PLD AV'fIIORIZI1IG 'fD COO1r'fT TO PJWVIDE DnKLOPMD'f UVZD SDVICES
roa 'fD En'IU JlALS'fA'f'f DrnLOPMD'l' UOIO8AL IMPAC'f - A.PPJtOVG WITH
.\A5II~l' 'fB.A'f A~r DPIUS IX I'In YU.RS
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 24 and May 3, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavits of publication
filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an
Interlocal Governmental Agreement between the County and the City of
Waples authorizing the County to provide development review serJices
for the entire Hal.tatt Development of Regional Impact.
Assistant to the County Manager Olliff reported that this item has
been discussed several times. Me noted that this is an Interlocal
Agreeaent between the County and the City of Naples for a unified
Developaent Review of the Halstatt DRI project which is located at the
corner of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway, a portion of which
lies within the City of Naples.
Mr. Olliff explained that the Agreement outlines the process
whereby the County will perform the Development Review of the DRI and
the issuance of the PUD ordinance. He advised that the City would be
responsible for the remainder of the review process through per-
sitting, inspections, and "CO" issuance.
Mr. Olliff reported that the City of Naples is comfortable with
the Agreement, but they have requested that a stipulation be included
which states that the Agreement will expire in 5 years. He noted that
Staff has no problem with this stipulation, since the County would
have issued the PUD ordinance four years prior to this. He advised
that Staff is recommending approval of the Agreement, with the stipu-
lation as stated above.
City Manager Fr~k Jones advised that the City is pleased with the
Agreeaent.
CO8a1_ioner ..... 1IQV8d, seconded by Co_i..iemer 8ban.~an and
carried 4./0, tr. close the public hearing.
Co.ai..ioner ~~.".h.n~, seconded by Co_i..iemer ...- and
~O
Page 9
",,-,---- - ' ... ",- . -~--"-,,-,,~,,'---_._--'" ".....",",.--
MAY 8, 1818
carr"" ./0 to aathor1ze the CbaJI'II8I1 to 8JUtCUte the Inter local
8v"'.A~t AvJ¡;~'1T nt, aatborizing the Coun1:y to prov1ð8 develos-nt
l'8Yi.. .-rYicee to the Bal.tatt DIU project, including that port10Z1
w1thiA the C11:y ot .apl- tor the DIU, POD Ordinance and 8Ub8eq"a.8nt
aubet....Ual d8v1ati0D8, with the 8t1pulation that the Agr..-nt
ezp11"88 iA t 1". .,.er., and torward this Agr8888nt to the Ci1:y.
~I
Page 10
_._-' " .' " ---""'--
"'-.--,... .
MAY 9, 1989
It- ..,&1
USOLU'fX 011 I 9-11 5, Pr"..I'fIOII V-II-3, MIt. RO. PDGL or rounD
AJIC1[Z'f'8CTS, DC. JœPUSDTI.O DR. J'OB P. J'Jt. AJrD MJUI. J' I LL cromu co,
DQUDTDfG A 0.. I'OO'f VUUJlCK nOM 'I'D REQUIUD non TAIlD SftBACK: or
30 FEET TO 21.1 FEET, roR PltOPD'1'T LOCATED O. 'I'D un SIDE or
~UV81lKnlø I. PUICU BAT - ADOPTKD
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 23, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-89-3,
filed by Dr. John Guercio, Jr., represented by Ron pergl of Forsythe
Architect., Inc., requesting a 0.4 foot variance from the required
front yard setback of 30 feet to 29.6 feet tor property located at 813
Buttonbush Lane, in a PUD zone, and further described as Block B, Site
19, Pelican Bay, Unit 1.
Planner So to advised that this variance request i. tor a three
year old single-family home in Pelican Bay. She reported that when
the applicant purcha.ed the home he noted that there was an encroach-
aent into the front yard setback. She indicated that the Petition
request is for a variance of 0.4 feet.
Ms. Soto stated that on April 20, 1989, the CCPC reviewed this
Petition, and unanimously recommended approval of same. She noted
that Staff is also recommending approqal.
Mr. Ron Pergl of Forsythe Architects, Inc., representing the
Petitioner, advised that he has been requested by the Guercio's attor-
ney to change the wording in the Petition from Dr. 30hn P. Guercio,
3r. to Dr. 30hn P. Guercio, Jr. and 3i11 P. Guerc10, husband and wife.
Ms. Soto indicated that Staff has no problem with this request.
c-1_10Der Sh.81"4IIha:n 8OVed, seconded by C088i..1oner 11&8- and
.:arr1ed .10 to cloee the public hearing.
c-1_icmer Shanahan 8OVed, _conded by C088i..ioner 1Ia8- and
carried .10 that Petition V-I9-3 be approved, with the II88nd84 n8888
of the Petitioner., thereby adopting Resolution 19-115.
15
Page 11
-,. -- """",...""",,.,...-
. "'.--.-..-'"",.-----. '._-,-._---,.",,-- ,-
--,- -~-"'---
MAY 9, 1989
I~.. nA2
DSOLV'fI08 8SÞ-118, PETITIO. V-li-2, MR. COR'l'LAJrD DtJ88UU REQOKSU.G A
1.1 roar VAJtIDCK nOM 'l'D UQUIRED non YARD 8KTBAa or 3& rD1' TO
2&.9 rKZ'f - ADOPrKD. 6.6 rooT VMIAJrCE nOM TO REQUIRED non YARD
8ETBACE or 3ð rKE'f TO 21.4 rKE'f, roK PROPERTY LOCATKD AT 'l'D 80tJT'll1ßtST
coon or 10lTH AVE. AIm 8TH COtm'f WEST, MAPLES POX - DDIED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 23, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-89-2,
filed by Cortland Dusseau, requesting a 9.1 foot variance from the
required front yard setback of 35 feet to 25.9 feet and a 6.6 foot
variance from the required front yard setback of 35 feet to 28.4 feet
in a RMF-6 zone for property desc~ibed as Lots 34 and 3ð, Replat of
Blocks 4 and 5, Unit 1, Naples Park, (corner lot located on the SW
corner of 108th Avenue, North and 8th Court West, Section 28, Township
48 South, Range 25 East).
Planner Soco stated that the ßubject property is located in Naples
Park, on a corner lot (108th Avenue and 8th Court West). She indi-
cated that originally, the Petitioner was seeking to move a home from
another location in Naples Park to Lot 35. She advised that the
Building Permit was issued, but at t¡le time the home was on the
trailer and about to be placed on Lot 35, the Inspection Department
noticed that it did not meet the ßetbacks. She reported that the
Petitioner also owns Lot 34, and ~he home was set on that lot. She
noted that the combination of LotlJ 34 and 35 would make the property
a conforming lot, but separately, they are non-conforming lots.
Ms. So to indicated that there are two front yard setbacks with a
corner lot, which is currently 35' in Naples Park. She replied that
the Petitioner is requesting an addition to the existing home, in
order to construct a duplex.
Ms. Soto reported that on April 20, 1989, the CCPC recommended
approval of the 9.1 foot variance on 108th Avenue, but denial of the
6.6 foot variance on 8th Court West. She advised that 3 letters of
strong objection against this Petition have been received, but Mr.
Dusseau has since talked with all three objectors, and one has sub- t/7
Page 12
,---"'--'---""
,,_.'
MAY 9, 1989
aitted. letter stating that he now has no problea with the variance;
verbal approval was received via telephone from the other two objec-
tor..
Mr. Cortland Dusseau, owner of the property, stated that he
contracted with a moving contractor to move two houses which he
purchased. He indicated that a survey was made of the lots, prior to
the purchase of the houses. Me noted that a Building Permit was
issued but at the time of the inspection by the Code Enforcement
Official, he was advised that the house would not fit on Lot 35. He
noted that he was told that the house would in fact fit on Lot 34, so
he con.ented to having .his done, but when the house was placed, it
was put on the property line. He advised that he has purchased
another lot in Naples Park to accomaodate the other house. He indi-
cated that he now has two lots, and expected to have two units there.
Mr. Dusseau reported that the other homes in the neighborhood have
2~' or less setbacks.
Coamissioner Shanahan questioned the recommendation of Statt?
Ms. So to replied that Staff is recommending approval of the 9.1
foot variance on 108th Avenue, and the 6.6 foot variance on 8th Court
West tor the existing building only, but they are not agreeing to the
addition. She advised that Staff is recommending approval, based on
the recommendation of the CCPC.
Mr. Dusseau submitted photos and a copy of the floor plan for the
record.
Co8ai..icmer ...- 8OV8d, eecond.ed by C088i..ioner ShJII "'l1an and
carried .10 that the public hearing be cloeed.
CO88.i-1oner l!a8.. 8OV8d, _conded. by C088i..ioner Shanat>an and
carried .10 to approve the exi.ting building, but deny the a4cUtion to
it, thereby approviI&g the i.l toot varianc., but the IS.IS toot varianc.
on 8th Court ""t will be denied.
Ii
Page 13
---- -..---
-"
HAY 9, 1989
It- MA
JIlt. LDI .....-./.1. ItD'KUDTIJIO PLAJl'fA'fIO. I8LA8D PROPDTY OWJIDSI
ASSOCU'f'IOJI DQOKn'I!IG SIIJDIALE ALOJfQ PLAJl'fA'fIO. PAJtDAT - PftOJ'KC'f 'f0
n IJICLDDKI) I. LIST or 8IDDU.LK: nonCTS TO 8E BID I. .1tJH 0Jt .roLY
Mr. Lea Pennell, President of the Property OWners' Association of
Plantation Island, stated that he is requesting sidewalks and bike-
paths for safety reasons. Me indicated that there is a road that
leads between the ~o bridges on S.R. 29 which is about 18'-19' wide,
and the cars and trucks rush up and down that road at a high rate of
speed. He indicated that most of the people walking along that road
will aove off the side of the road when they hear a vehicle coming.
Mr. Pennell indicated that he understood that Plantation Island
would be on the top of the priority list for sidewalks and bikepaths
thi8 year, but he has now learned that all the funds have been
exhausted.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported that
Staff is aware of the need for bikepaths. He noted that in 1986,
plans and specs were incorporated for that project as part of the
County overall bikepath program. He indicated that at that time
8650,000 worth of bikeway needs were identified, and Staff has under-
taken 50~ of thea. Me reported that the majority of the bikepaths that
have been built, are related to dirc~t access to Bchools. He stated
that in the current year, Staff i8 in the process of putting together
another listing, and preparing plans and specifications. He noted
that with the Board's direction, Staff will include this project on
that list, follow through with the bidding, and bring back the bid
results as well as Staff's recommendations, based upon the limited
aaount of funding that the County has. Me explained that it must be
realized that there are a number of new schools, and the bikepaths for
those schools will take priority over this bikepath, particularly if
there are insufficient funds to cover all of the needs.
Commissioner Saunders stated that the sensible approach seems to
be to include this project in the bid package and see what Staff comes
up with. He questioned when the bid package will be let?
.5þ
Page 14
'-' - ----"-,," """,",.
- ",-~_. ",---"
MAY 9, 1989
In answer to Coamissioner Saunders, Mr. Archibald advised that the
bidding of these projects will take place in June, 3uly, or August of
this year.
~t ..iClD8r ..... 8:I'9'8d, aecon4eð by C088ia.ioner Goodnight aDd
carried ./0 to 1nclade the Plantation I.land Project in the li.t of
projecbl to be bid during the .:mtha of jtma. july. or Auguat.
... 1t8ce8.: 10:1& A.M. - Jlecomraneð: 10:28 A.M. at which
t188 Depaty Clark hnyon replaced Deputy Clerk Boff8an ...
It_..a
MR. an.r. DOIIAJrO'K'. MA'f1...UJtOJI'f 8KTBACX aDP rn OW 8288.00 MAIVKD
Mr. Bill Donahue of 2300 Crayton Road stated that he designed a
hoae and the lot was not what the surveyor said it was and he came in
for a variance assuming he would have a double-sided front yard set-
back and he would use the rear yard setback as a side yard setback,
but after the var1ance was denied he redesigned the home and submitted
it to the Building Department which is when he was told that he could
not treat the rear yard as a side yard, noting that it had to be
treated as a waterfront yard. Me stated that he ended up paying two
te.. to get one ite. handled, adding that he paid $4~0.00 for the
variance hearing and $255.00 for the waterfront yard. He stated that
he is requesting that one of these fees be waived.
Community Development Services Administrator Brutt stated that
what Mr. Donahue has stated is correct. Me noted that after the
variance was denied, Staff recommended that a site development plan be
filed, which he did. Me noted that this was administrative action and
was approved and because of an erroneous decision that was made by the
Staff in October of 1988, he was charged two fees. He noted that it
the correct interpretation had been made in the original decisions,
there would have been no need for the second application, therefore,
Staff recommends that the $255.00 fee be returned to Mr. Donahue.
C--i..l0D8r 8ha"'.~4m 8:I'9'8d. _con4eð by C088i.eioner Goodnight and
carri.. a/o. (ec-1..icmer Sc1m4er. out of the rooa). that the 82&0.00
f.. for Mr. aUl Donahue'", waterfront -tback SDP be waived.
.J'1
Page 18
""."."..'.'....
-,
MAY 9, a8g
I t8s .ec
STAn' TO an- PIIO8LD18 COJrCKItJI'IJIG .1AJr&S SCDIO DRIft AJß) UPOa'f BA.CE
TO 'fD IICC
Mrs. Mercedes McCallen stated that she lives in the Fakahatchee
Strand State Preserve but she has no affiliation with them. Jhe incH-
cated that there are problems in this State Preserve specifically with
County Road 837 called Janes Scenic Drive. She noted that 3anes
Scenic Drive offers unrestricted access and there are no speed limits
posted and this causes safety hazards to people. She indicated that
aniaals are being hit and killed, vehicles are going oft the road into
ditches, people are carrying guns and spot lights to attract deer, and
people are reaoving rare and endangered plants that are only in this
State Preserve. She indicated that she would like something done
about this and perhaps this road could be limited to traffic only
during dayti.e hours by way of a gate.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that Janes
Scenic Drive serves as a transportation link until the 1-75 construc-
tion 1s co.pleted and as more and more growth occurs in Golden Gate
Estates, Janes Scenic Drive may become a roadway that will increase in
the volume of traffic. He stated that the access to I-75 will be
denied for a large number of properties and the only protection bet-
ween Golden Gate Estates and State Road 29 and U.S. 41 ar~a will be by
way of 3anes Scenic Drive. He stated that he could provide some
signage to warn people and post some speed control iamediately. He
indicated that this may be a minimal effect.
Commissioner Hasse questioned if this road could be restricted to
day use only, to which Public Works Administrator Archibald stated
that there may be .ore need for access and emergency vehicles to use
this road. He note~ that it would be difficult to prohibit traffic
aoveaent during certain hours.
Commissioner Hasse stated that there should be better surveillance
on this road by the Sheriff's Department and the Fish and Game
Co-ission. ff
Page 16
.,.",."'"..,~".,_.,
",.." ' ~--
MAY 9, 1989
C088iaaioner Shanahan stated that it appears that there need. to
be aoaething done with regards to signage and the posting of speed
li.its as well as enforcement with regards to people hunting at night
with spot11ghts.
Co..issioner Saunders questioned if it is illegal to hunt at night
with a spotlight, to which Mrs. McCallen stated that all plants and
aniaala are protected in a State Preserve.
Coamissioner Goodnight stated that it is illegal throughout the
State of Florida.
Mr. Archibald stated that the County has worked closely with the
Depart.ent of Natural Resources in trying to Gontrol access of 3anes
Scenic Drive and he will continue to work closely with them to
discourage the side roads from being used.
CO..is8ioner Saunders stated that by asking the State to enforce
these laws and by posting speed limits signs, it may not do much good
but it aay help. He øtated that the Sheriff's Department is not going
to hire an additional person for this road, adding that he does not
know enough about the issue to indicate whether alternatives should be
looked at with regards to keeping the road open or not. He indicated
that there was discussion a few yearL ago with regards to closing this
road. He stated that he feels that the appropriate action for the
Board would be to direct Staff to look at the appropriate alternatives
and report back to the Board.
Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that this is an area
that is in transition and the DNR is attempting to follow through with
the purchase of the private lands which takes time, but in add1tion,
the DNR is coming up with plans to develop it as a preserve and to
provide tor public access that would be controlled by the Park Ser-
vice. He stated that possibly he could obtain those plans so that any
efforts that the County makes would be coordinated with the DNR.
c-1-iClD8r 8ca.Dder. 8OV8d, aeccmded by C088i..i0D8r Goodnight,
tba~ .~ldt nwi- thi. _~t.r wi th the DO, the 8heritt'. Departaent,
the .l8rida Parka l: a.cr.a~ion, and whatever agenci- would b8ge .j~/
P8g8 1'7
---,-,"--,.----_.-
-,-------- . ,-, ---,' ---.,
JU.'l ., a..
jur1841ct:laa 0'9'8%' ~he rakahatcb88 8trand and rapor~ back to the Board
on tile mrt8a~ ot tile probl- that baa been outlined aDd poeeible aolu-
~1DD8 ~o ~~ probl- including. if DeC-8&lT. a c~ideration of
cl081D8 ö.a~ rO84 or taking other action.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that a few years ago, the Sheriff's
Depart.ent discouraged the Board from closing that road because of the
Sheriff'. participation in that area and as part of her decision, she
would need a report fro. the Sheriff's Department with regards to
their position on this aatter.
Deputy Storrar stated that he would provide this inforaation from
the Sheriff to the Board.
Co..issioner Saunders stated that he would request that th1s
aatter be brought back to the Board prior to their vacation and also
that Mrs. McCallen be notified when it will be presented to the Board.
0p8a call for the queaUon. the aoUon carried 1ID8Z1i80u8ly .10.
It- ..0
~unAn08 8'l lat. w. DIn U USOLU'fIO. 8'l-U - COll'l'IIIUKD on If8U
Mr. Willi88 F. White st~ted that he is making this appeal because
through no fault of his own he has not been able to start his addjtion
which was previously approved to Whlte's Motel. He noted that he had
a loan set up with a local bank but it did not go through because the
interest went up when they changed their loan officers. He stated
that he now has the financing available and he is asking for a 90 day
extension on the provisional use.
Coaaunity Development Services Administrator Brutt stated that in
April 1987, the Board heard a request from the ap~licant relative to
allowing them to have a provisional use for the expansion of the
White's Motel and the adjacent and contiguous property. He noted that
this provisional use was for a one year time period and in March,
1988, a request was made for a continuation of that provisional use
for another one year period which was granted by the Board on that
date and haa since expired on April 14, 1989. Me noted that the
Zoning Ordinance at the p~es~r.t ti.e states that the Board aay extend
ð/~
Page 18
~-,,-'-",""" ,. . '" '" -""------
""-,,--,. - -
MAY 9, 1989
the provisional use one ti.e up to one year upon written request of
the Petitioner, and this has been done. He stated that Staff sees no
difficulties with regards to any negatives of the particular site,
there is a question with regards to the Zoning Ordinance.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the provisional use was granted
and was extended for one year and then they came in for a building
per.it on the last day of the extension.
Mr. White stated that when the per.it was to be picked up, there
were a few things that had to be changed due to new restrictions,
adding that he was there in time to pick up the permit but not the
provisional use application.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that he was originally asked that if
the building per.it had not been picked up by the end of the second
year were they vested, and his answer to that was "no". He stated
that he was under the impression that they were in for their first
application. He stated that if the Board would like, they could con-
tinue this for a week, and he would provide a written report.
Mr. White indicated that he does not have a proble. continuing
this for one week as the finances are now available.
Coamissioner Saunders stated that the proble. is that there may
not be anything that the Board can do legally to help at this time,
but the County Attorney will review the ordinances and report back
next week to the Board.
~i..1cmer ~.hw1 8W8d. 88Con48d by Co8ai_icmer Go?dn1ght
8Dd C8rr 184 ~..,. i --a.al y 4.10. that this ..tter be cODt~ tor ODe ---k.
It- .-&a
0P'f'I~ .1 A.III) n aOAIU>IJIG DISJJOJtSI.O POCD'f or I'UYA«U cø.&JI'!' rmrD8 -
L-.._",~
Housing and Urban Improvement Director Shreeve stated that this
ite. was discussed last week with regards to a budget amend8ent in
order to set up the accounting for t~e Pocket of Poverty Grant, adding
that at that time, he was requested to investigate what could be done
to increase the funding or to better disburse the funds. He stated
."j"'1
Page 19
,"-----
MAY 9, 1989
that there were four applicants that applied for $1 million and the
total aaount of their applications was $1,034,715. He stated that
Iaaokalee Non-Profit Housing, Inc. is going to build 40 units of
housing and they are requesting $500,000. He noted that Collier
County Concerned Citizens are going to build an older far8Worker
congregate center and they are also interested in finishing the road
within the Collier Village. Me stated that the County is anticipating
that they will receive a $650,000 Community Development Block Grant
which will be used to pave the streets, install water and sanitary
sewer as well as a puap lift station, construction of the lakes and
put in fill aaterial so that the land can be developed and used. Me
stated that Collier County Housing Authority is going to put in 30
units in this area and Collier Village ia going to deed 44 lots to
Hab1tat for Mumanity to build houses. He indicated that the $.87,500
of the grant would be used for the actual construction work for all
the i.provements and $65,000 is budgeted for engineering and $97,500
is for adainistration which is the maxi.um 15~ that can be used. Me
stated that when they receive the grant, he feels that the administra-
tive cost can be cut to $92,000 which i~ about 8~ of the grant which
would free up $42,500 to add to the construction cost. Ht'! stated that
the Collier County Mousing Authority has applied for 80 units of far.-
workers housing and 50 units would be put in just south of their pre-
sent site for farmworkers village and $90,000 is required to buy that
15 acres of land south of their present site and the other 30 units
would go in Collier Village. He stated that Collier County Hou~ing
Authority is expecting a letter soon indicating that this has been
approved and as soo~ as it is, they will move rapidly to start buying
this land. He stated that he is proposing Option #1 which is that the
County allocates $31,715 to be used in the Pocket of Poverty program
and the full $90,000 would be allocated to the Collier County Housing
Authority and when the Block Grant is received, construction will
begin on the road and then the money for the Collier County Concerned
Citizens infrastructure could be started. Me noted that the Community
£%
Page 20
".'"",-",....
,..-
,-.
MAY 9, 1989
Devel0p88nt Block Grant would be revised and some of the .oney that
was to be used for administrative costs would be used for the road and
would not coat the County anything. He stated that there are several
other proposals and one would be to cut back and not award the full
$90,000 to the Collier County Housing Authority. He stated that at
present the Pocket of Poverty Committee has allocated $58,285 which is
where the $31,715 difference is.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that she does not want to go against
the Pocket of Poverty CJmmittee, but they could only recommend so
auch, adding that if Mr. Shreeve feels that he can cut some of the
adainistrat1ve coats, then she would like to take the $31,715 from the
IaaoJcalee Habitat for Humanity and add it to the Housing Authority and
then give the Iaaokalee Mabitat for Humanity the $31,716 from the
adainistrative costs when the Coæ.unity Development Block Grant is
received. She stated that this will also show that County government
is encouraging affordable housing. She stated that this would be
Option. #1 and #2.
Mr. Shreeve stated that he is advertising for a consultant and
if one is not able to be retained for this amount, then an additional
staff person could be hired and this could be done in-house.
Co..issioner Shanahan stated that he feels that this is the best
way to proceed.
C i..100er""" 8C7ftId, 88C0Dded by CO881..ioner 800dD.Jgb~ aDd
C8Z'1'1..a --i-..ly 4/0, ~hat tb8 allocation - re<: V'Iðeð by S t at f
he ~. _w-4 ..Jch 1nc11Jð88 Options .1 aDd #2 of the b8c1IU". 8,. -r
- i....t..~ _low:
1. The County may allocate $31,715 to the Pocket of Poverty
prograa, use a consultant to adainister to Coaaunity
Develop.ent Block Grant, and li.it the administrative costs to
8' of the Grant. If the Department of Community Affairs
approves the amendments, $45,500 of the Block Grant funds
would be used for street improvements and the County would not
need to use the allocated funds.
2. The Department of Housing and Urban Improvement be permitted
to add one additiunal staff person to administer the Community
Developaent Block Grant. This would be paid out of the Grant
using about 7' to 8' of the Grant funds and still free Grant
funds as outlined in #1 above.
I~_.-ol 59
Page 21
._--'"'---'" .-.""-"-"'-""
MAY 9, 1989
-,..~ I8KD TO - ~&.I""X&U rJtQII 'I'D VDlZTUDS roa SC1IOOL UD euu..I
. AU ~ t ~ - Ar i' ao Y &II SUB.nCT TO PItOVI 8 I on
County Manager Dorrill stated that there have been a number of
issues and problems related to the conveyance and joint use of this
property in aaintaining the desires and integrity of the development
on behalf of the Vineyards. He noted that the location of the fire
departaent site in the northeast quadrant of this site, the 1-1/4
acres, has been removed and the developer has now agreed to accom-
aodate the desires of the fire district for property that is within
the PUD west of 1-75 along Livingston Extension. Me stated that this
is the preferred site of the fire district. He indicated that this
fire site is therefore removed fro. th1s property and the use of the
property will be conveyed to the County to be used for a park and an
eleaentary school. He stated that the reason that this ite. was added
on this date is because of the need to accommodate a new ele.entary
school by next fall, ~dding that the School Board is under extreme
pressure to get the school open at this location which is going to be
difficult to do in this ti.e period. Me noted that the Vineyards have
agreed that within the 34.9 acres that will be conveyed to the County
to be used as a park site it will no~ include the canal right-of-way
along the western side of this property, adding that the County did
not want the park site to include a canal right-of-way that could not
be used for park amenities. He stated that the developer has agreed
to convey an additional 2 to 2-1/2 acres of land to the County that is
along the southern and eastern portion of the site that is adjacent to
the lake, therefore, the actual park property tha~ is net and
available to be developed as a park is around 36.4 acres, adding that
the developer's obligation is 34.9 acres. He stated that within this
acreage, the buffer has gone from 50 feet wide to 35 feet wide which
is the saae existing buffer that the Audubon Country Club has between
a residential area and a separate developed area.
Coamissioner Masse questioned if by cutting the buffering is this
giving .ore land to the park. to which County Manager Dorrill replied
&,0
Page 22
<,«---<- -_.."-<,,,-
MAY 9, l~e~
affinaatively, adding that if Mr. Assaad desires to have anyaore of a
buffer than that, it will have to be done on his property to the east.
He noted that Mr. Assaad has already agreed to pay for all the costs
associated with the landscape buffer, adding that the County has no
obligation to pay, install or maintain that buffer in the future.
County Manager Dorrill stated that if a fence is installed, it
will be done in conjunction with security provision~ at either the
8chool or the park site and the actual location of the fence will be
subject to and approved by the County and will be proposed by the
developer not to be installed until such time as the school i8 built
and then only for security reasons as it relates to the school or the
County park:. Me indicated that both the County and the School Board
generally have 80me type of perimeter fencing but the actual location
and type of fence will need to be coordinated and subject to the
approval of the County.
Co..issioner Hasse questioned who would be paying for the fence,
to which County Manager Dorrill stated that this has not been agreed
upon, but fenc1ng is generally a cost of County park sites and school
construction projects.
Co..issioner Saunders stated that if this is a fence on County
property that is to be used to fence a County park or a County school
that would be a normal cost for the County and the School Board.
Co..issioner Hasse stated that if the Vineyards wants this done as
well as the School Board, then they should share in the cost of the
fence.
County Manager Dorrill stated that the Vineyards may offer to
share !n the cost, but he is more concerned with the location of the
fence and who has final approval on the fence.
County Manager Dorrill stated that the two other issues deal with
general deed type covenants, adding that there is a difference between
legally what can be done as opposed to recognizing the fact that the
County will be part of a residential community. He stated that it is
incuabent upon the County and the School Board to be good neighbors
Page 23 ~I
""~,,,...,,".,,_.,-
"-,,
MAY 9, 1989
and within that regard, there is an concern regarding acces. on to
Vineyards Boulevard. He stated that his desire iy that the County and
the School Board have access to Vineyards Boulevard for the school and
the park and the Vineyards has concerns about controlling access,
recognizing that the County park probably will not be constructed
within five years. He 1ndicated that the Vineyards has similar con-
cerns that the signage at the school and the park adhere to the type
of signage that they use throughout their community, adding that he
does not have a proble. with that issue. He noted that he feels that
the Vineyards has an obligation to pay for the cost of the signage to
the saae extent that Le~y agreed to pay for the signage at Lely
Barefoot Beach. He stated that the final matter involves lighting of
ballfields and lighting at the school itself, adding that everyone
need. to agree to the extent possible that the lighting will be
designed and operated in such a way to minimize the impact on the
adjacent residential areas.
Co..issioner Hasse questioned if the location of the fire station
has been resolved to the satisfaction of the fire district, to which
Chief 30nes of the North Naples Fire Department stated that they are
satisfied with the location.
Coamissioner Shanahan questioned what the additional 2-1/2 acres
would be used for that is in the southeastern section, to which County
Manager Dorrill stated that it would be owned by the County and could
be incorporated into a jogging or bicycle trail, subject to final
design. He noted that it could be developed in conjunction with the
final excavation of the retention lake.
Colll8issioner Shanahan stated that within the agreement there
should be ways to protect the residential areas from the ballfield
lights which should be do~e in the initial design.
County Manager Dorrill stated that the County is going to be part
of this comaunity and they should not impact on the adjacent residen-
tial areas.
Coamissioner Goodnight ~estioned it there i8 going to be an
(,'V
Page 2.
._.... -.-..,-..----
--..." -,-. -~
"' -.-
.-----,... -.,,-..
MAY g, ¡gag
access point off Vanderbilt Beach Road and Vineyards Boulevard, to
which County Manager Dorrill replied affirmatively.
Co..issioner Goodnight stated that previously there was discussion
with regards to an access ramp off 1-75 and questioned how this would
work. She stated that most school sites have two exits; one for the
parents and one for the buses. She stated that there needs to be good
traffic flow in this area.
Mr. Dorrill stated that what is being proposed is an improvement
over 8Ost eleaentary schools, adding that internally there are
separate driv~ays for bus pickup and car pickup, but in this case,
there are two separate accesses; one from Vineyards Boulevard and the
other from Vanderbilt Beach Road. He indicated that the Vineyards
would like some agreement as to the type of access that will be coming
onto Vineyards Boulevard. He noted that the rationale is that they
still need to sell residential sites or condominiums on two parcels
that are going to be immediately across from this and they do not want
their sales adversely affected.
Mr. James Sleety, Attorney for the School Board, stated that they
have resolved all their issues, adding that this is important to the
School Board. He stated that the settlement that has been related is
acceptable to the School Board and is better than what they expected.
Commissioner Hasse questioned if the entrance across from Arbor
Boulevard is a closed driveway, to which Mr. Siesky stated that the
concept for the short-term is to have two entrances that are not con-
nected. Me stated that the School would use the southern entrance for
bus traffic and parent drop off which would restrict the amount of
traffic on Vineyards Boulevard and would aid the developer for the
short-term. He sta~ed that the aajority of the traffic would access
the site by means of Vanderbilt Beach Road.s this would be the larger
parking area. He stated that it will be designed so that it ie
usable and convenient for everyone. He stated that sometime in the
future, about five years, there would be a connection between the two
parking lots that would permit internal circulation and possibly a
(/5
Page 2ð
....,....._-",-,..-
~-'
.-...'
MAY 9, 1989
roadway around tha periaeter of the site that would also per.it cir-
culation.
Co..i88ioner Hasse questioned if the 1-1/4 acres for the f1re site
would be incorporated into the school site, to which Mr. Sieslcy stated
that the boundaries will be adjusted by the developer so that the
School and the County receive the negotiated acreage.
Co..issioner Goodnight questioned if this is going to be the same
prototype as the rest of the elementary schools, to which Mr. Sieslcy
replied affirmatively, adding that this had to be done because of the
extreae tiae pressure .nd, therefore, plans are being re-used.
Mr. Hafaa Assaad, Project Manager of the Vineyards, stated that
with regards to the fence, this should be the County expense and not
the Developer's expense.
Co..issioner Shanahan questioned if all the landscaping respon-
sibility and the buffering will be the developer's responsibility with
the except10n of the waterway, to which County Manager Dorrill rep11ed
affiraatively for both construction and perpetual maintenance.
Mr. Assaad stated that this is only within the buffered area and
the County has the responsibility of the waterway along 1-75.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that he wrote a letter to Mr. Lurie,
who is the Attorney for the Vineyards, which will be made part of the
record. (Appended)
Mr. Sieslcy stated that based upon the accommodations of the
Developer, the School Board would accept responsibility for installa-
tion of any fence that it ~esired to install.
County Manager Dorrill stat~d that the actual conveyance that is
de8ired 1s a single warranty deed because the rationale is that the
School Board and th~ County have an obligation to jointly develop a
8ite plan that recognizes that the School and the Park are going to
1nter-relate in aany aspects with regards to parking, recreation
fields, etc.
Commissioner Hasse questioned if the interchange right-of-way is
going to take a big part out of the park land, to which County Manager
{p¥-
Page 26
---,--
,
--_...-,--,-,-,...,
MAY 9, 1989
Dorrill stated that this is a possibility. He stated that based on
the current DOT ten year plan and their financial problems, it is not
an i...diate possibility. He stated that it is not inconceivable that
at soae point beyond the ten years, the DOT .ay wish to conatruct an
access to I-75 ðnd another alternative would be to install some type
of cloverleaf wind-down access on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach
Road.
County Manager Dorrill stated that the action that is necessary is
that the Chairaan be authorized to accept a warranty deed subject to
all the provisions that have been outlined and are part of the record
as well as the letter that was prepared by the County Attorney.
Co..issioner Saunders stated that he assumes that the only main
issue at this point is the payment of the fence and the School Board,
through their representative, has indicated that they are willing to
pay for their share of the fence. Me stated that he feels that if the
fence is built to the normal County standards for a park fence then
the County and the School Board should pay for it, but if it is going
to be something out of the ordinary because of the desires of the
Vineyards, then the Vineyards should pay for any additional cost.
Co..issioner Masse questioned if by removing the fire station site
is it going to aake the School and the County property any saaller, to
which County Manager Dorrill stated that there would be a new site
plan prepared but it will not take this fire station site out of the
northeast corner, adding that it will be available for the use of the
School and the County depending on the final site. He indicated that
this will help in terms of greater utilization of the site.
~t...1aDer tl'hanahvl 8OV8d, 88Conded by CO881..iOD8r GoodD1gh~
aDd CIUT i e4 u:n-n t --ual y .1 0, that a warranty cSee4 tMr accep~e4 8Ubjec~
~o aJ.l ÜII8 prcwi.i0n8 that have been outlined and II8d8 a part of ÜII8
~-~H lDcl1l4.1ng ÜII8 lett.r prepared by the County AttorD8T to 'ferry
A. L8:rie, -.quire.
/
(p~
Page 27
-- -,------",--
MAY 9, 1989
11:- not
JI8g- - & 80. 1 TO 'I'D ~ 1f1:'fII IIOU, MOII'fU . ASSOCUns, DIe .
I'C8. ..- ~ J: 08&L IaN xnP.IJfØ SDVI CD nnt 'fD SOO'fJI ~.,¡ It Jœ8 1 OI[AL
~TD I'ACYLJ:TJ:U - ArrkOvIW
Utilities Adainistrator Arnold stated that this involves an
agreement that the County entered into with Hole, Montes & Associates,
Inc. in September, 1986, which was one of two agreements in regards to
the South County Regional Wastewater facilities. He indicated that
this agreement was originally formatted using the percentage factor
bã=ed on the amount of construction. He stated that at the time, they
hoped to qualify for Federal funding, but they did not know what the
requireaents would be a'- that time and, therefore, the standard format
agreement was used. He stated that the County did receive funding but
it required that the County revise the engineering agreements and
bring them into conformance with EPA. He stated that the fundi~g was
set up on an as-needed basis, adding that they originally approached
the project fro. the standpoint that it may not get to construction
but only to the design stage. He stated that the funding currently
standa at 81.6 Billion and in order to complete the pre-construction
portion of the contract, he is asking for further f~ding authoriza-
tion of approxiaately $50,000 which w~uld bring th~ design phase part
of the agreement up to $1.7 million. Me noted that Part II of this
action is to approve the amendment to the agreement which brings it
into comformance with the EPA guidelines and that mandates a change in
the agreement from a percentage basis to a fixed cost plus profit fac-
tor. He noted that with approval of Amendment #1 and the funding
authorization for the project, it would bring the total engineering
fees for the projøct to slightly over $2.5 million which is about 14-
of the total cost of this agreement which 1s consistent with what
engineering agreements have been in the past.
Co..issioner Saunders questioned if this is consistent with other
co88U11ities, to which Mr. Arnold replied affirmatively, adding that he
has reviewed this and feels that the fees are reasonable. He stated
that once this amendment 1s approved, it will be submitted to the 1}-
Page 28
".,- .-.,,-- ....""... .-,,"'..-"'.---."'..
,.,-.,,---.. . -
MAY 9, 1989
State and part of the engineering fees will be recuperated as part of
the grant proce.8.
C '-10lIl81" tnuoft~~ 8O"I'8d. ........oðed by C~_1011181" ..... aDd
carr1ed ./0. (ec-1_ianer GoodDigh~ out. ot ~ rooa). ~~ ~...,..'~t
80. 1 U ÖI8 Ap'&I..n~ wi~h Bole. IIont.. a uaociat... Inc. tor pro-
t...1aDa1 eag1DeeriDg aerv1c.. tor ~ South Coanq Reg1cmal
~ J'8c1l1t:1.. be ~roved.
1j
Page 29
,-,.' '. ,.-,. ".,...,. ""
,,------
MAY 9, 1989
lu. .-n
DI"LVa'f IJIa18ATIOIr AGIt~4 WIn CML B»IMOCI: aUJClUtI - AP!1tuv&U
Utilities Adainistrator Arnold stated that in the continuing
efforts to dispose of the effluent that is being generated in the
wastewater treatment plants, he is continually seeking different orga-
nizations that can make use of this effluent to help with the water
conservation efforts. He stated that up to this point, Staff has pri-
aarily negotiated with golf courses as they are the biggest users. He
stated that this particular nursery whIch is the subject of this
agenda Itea, is located next to the power easement which is north of
Iaaokalee Road and happens to be in the same alignment with the pipe
line that provides effluent to Imperial Golf Course. He stated that
it is a siaple aatter to branch off this line and provide service to
this nursery. Be stated that he views this as a good agreement in
regard to trying to increase public awareness of the recyclIng efforts
and also to bring on some different users. He stated that this par-
ticular nursery will be producing trees, landscaping, etc., for new
developments and this method will lend itself well to that use.
Coaaissioner Saunders questIoned if the 2C per 1,000 gallons is a
reasonable charge, to which Mr. Arnold stated that it is probably not
a reasonable charge at thIs point, but originally when the County
entered negotiatIons with the golf courses the rates were comparable
with the City of the Naples for their golf courses. He noted that
there was a lot of reluctance on taking effluent to begin with but
thIs situation has changed in the last few years. He stated that when
the South County system Is on line, his plan is to do a restructuring
and set up rates that reflect the cost of the proèuction of the
effluent. He stated that this fee Is simply a nomInal fee to have the
aechanism in place.
Coamissioner Saunders questioned if it would be feasible to charge
a rate that would re-coup costs and also provide some revenues to the
system for iaprovements, to which Mr. Arnold stated that it could be
consistent with the rate structures for providing the basic water and
r¡(
Page 30
" ""--",,_. -"",_. . .... --"---_._---" ".-.......""""",
.--,.- - .
MAY 9, 1989
.ewer .erv1ce.
Co..i..ioner Saunders questioned if the agreement could be made
for a shorter period of time until the rate structure is put together,
to which Mr. Arnold replied negatively, add1ng that this agreement is
consistent with the t1.~ fraae for the other agreements in the
northern part of the County.
Co..iss1oner Shanahan stated that he does not feel that this
should be a five year contract at 20 per 1,000 gallons. He stated
that the aarket will probably be c~nsiderably greater than that before
the five year contract expires. He stated that the County should be
planning now tor aaintenance and growth.
Mr. Arnold stated that this is being planned, but he is not at
that point yet, adding that the prime directive is to dispose of the
effluent. He stated that Staff needs to look seriously at this as a
resource and the rate structure needs to be addressed in detail in the
future. He stated that he needs this s1te to get rid of effluent.
C i..l.-r"'" 8OV8d. 8eCCJDded by Co8ai_ioner Good:nlgh~ and
C8ZTied 3/1. ('"-i..loner "'8ftA~ OJ I~), that tb8 .~~luen~ lrri-
ga~l- 8p.l t with OWl " -dt IP1u ");1. be ç."","v..ð.
g>b
Page 31
---,---
-..,.,,'..--.'.-..
..
--,
MAY i, li89
I 1:88 ..oa
eIIl.,.... 08Dat . . TO II.IJtrl P - r &.It. AJI'D .a.s sac IA ns . IJrC. COII'fUoC'1' I'OIt
1œ81:C8&L MTD PLAJI'1' - PBASE 2 - ArMtOyKJ,l .a.s AllKJlDKD BY \;\lUau:
A;¡;~~I
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the only reason that this was
pulled fro. the Consent Agenda was to change the reco..endation to
have the Adainistrator of the Utilities Division to sign the documents
instead of the Board Chairaan since they are so nuaerous.
C I..t..r ~jgh1: ~. eeccmde4 by Co8aJa81DD8r ..... aDd
C8ZT !ell - f r _IT .10. 1:ba1: Cb.8Dge Order .. 1:0 Barry P-IflII"8~ aDd
A88oC iat88 . IDe. COD t ru:1: for 1:b8 aeg i ana 1 ..1: . r P 1 aD t. Pba8e 2. be
-...-.-4 - .&ad by the Ca1m1:y A 1:1:orney.
jQI
hg8 82
-,."',.-""'"~
"-----
MAY .. 1...
I1:8a ..1
aD ....IM1 LIDJ) C'8LL 1'ttO.nc'f8 I'OJt ~ AJß) IIAPLU LAJIDInLLS -
...... ~ 8U8'JIIf.8 LXflJICI 3111tIllT_. IJfC. Dr 'I'D AIIOOft o. '844. U8 .00
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Hews on
3anuary 27, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, bids were received for lined cell projects for Immokalee
and Naples Landfills until 2:30 P.M., February 22, 1~89.
Solid Waste Director Fahey stated that this involves the lining of
cells at both landfills. He stated that there are three aspects of
this work; the construrtion of the elevated base, the installation of
the liner and leachate collection system, and the special material
that is required to cover and protect the liner from damage. He
stated that because of delays in construction of the base, bids were
taken and he is now in a situation where they are five aonths behind.
Se stated that he is recommending that this bid be awarded to Gundle
Lining Systems, Inc. but the cost of $844,138 has been modified
because of an error in one of the components of their bid. He stated
that one of the items is the leachate collection system and the rock
that is associated with that, noting that the specifications prohibit
the use of limerock which they bid and requiring them to supply gra-
nite rock increased their bid price by $40,000 but even with this
irregularity their total bid is $95,444 less than the next lowest
bidder. He stated that he is recoamending that their bid be accepted
because of the time constraints that he is now facing. He stated that
he does not feel that he could get a lower bid if it was rebid.
c-1_1cmer ..... 8OV8d. seconded by C0881..ioner ~jgb~ IID4
carr!" """"1~IT .10, that Bid "9-1311 tor lined cell project. tor
T-1- IIDd llapl- La.n4till. be .warded to Bundle Lin1ag 8y8t....
IDe. La ~ 88Ø8Dt of $844.138.
I~- ...2
8ID ...-UM .. 81'SCLU. nLL MATDXAL J'Oft LIJrD PItO.nc'f8 A'f IIAPLU
&lID ~.~ - r..AIIWILLS - AII&JU)KD TO SD CO. I.OODTft.IKS. "';1; ;1;- ItOADS.
&lID Al'flC-n.c8XN . IJI'C.
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Hews on I ¡cY
March 16, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
Page 33
.".-.-,,-.-'-'
,,'-
.---.-..-
MAY 9, 1989
the Clerk, bids were received for fill material for liner projects at
Naples and raaokalee Landfills until 2:30 P.M., April ð, 1989.
Solid Waste Director Fahey stated that this item concerns the
cover material that will be used to cover the liner, adding that this
material is special and must have a high grade of porosity to allow
the leachate to be collected in the pipes. He stflt,.~ that h. is
recoaaending that Sea Con Industries, Better Roads, ~~d APAC-Florida,
Inc. be awarded the bids and he "ill then use the best material that
is available and also assure hi.self that there is an alternative
source if one supplier should run out of this material.
Mr. George Keller, President of Collier County Civic Federation,
questioned if anyone is getting the bulk of this bid, to which Mr.
Fahey stated that they will use the one with the lowest price first,
but if the lowest price .aterial does not meet the spec1fications or
he runs out of that material, then they will use the second low
bidder.
In anSMer to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Fahey stated that assuming
that the .aterial will be delivered to the Naples Landfill and
installed, both Sea Con and APAC-Florida have the same price "hich 1s
$6.30 per ton. He stated that with k'egards to Immokalee, APAC-Florida
is considerably laMer.
C t..i-.r m-.-tun. 1IO98d. 88C0DdecS by CO88.1_iODer 400dDJght:
8Dd 88rr18d -t~ly 4/0, that: 8id ...-13IS tor special fill
_1:er1a1 for 11.Der project:a at .8111- IIDd I~Jtal- L8Ddflll. be
~ to ... CoD Indu.8'tri_, Bet:ter JtOIId8, and APAC-Wlorlda, Inc.
I tea ft81
CC8DIC'r a,¡u-I08 H.1..I... COLLIn euu.;¡;;a: .um 8B'f'1'D 1tOAJJ8. IIIC. -
a 80 ""1'" - &fir_Tau
Assistant to the County Manager Olliff stated that this item was
discussed last Meek regarding a contract extension on the time frame
for the contract between Collier County and Better Roads for fill
aater1al for the same landfill cell projects. Me stated that the
actual contract "ith Better Roads "as based on a fill site at Crown
Jig
Page 3.
--"-"-
.-
MAY 9, 1989
Pointe POD an~ the POD did not have language that addressed re.oving
fill saterial from the site and therefore, there was a problem in
being able to provide this until a POD amendment was proce..ed and
approved by the Board. He stated that there i. only 20 ton. of
saterial that can be removed from this site and the contractor has an
obligat10n to provide an additional 12,000 to 15,000 tons of off-site
saterial. He noted that an amendment to this contract has been pre-
pare~ that would require him to provide that off-site material in the
interim period until the POD amendment is brought before the Board and
then contingent upon that POD amendment being approved, he w1l1 be
able to have that contract extension and continue to provide that
material. He stated that he is asking that the Board approve this
aaend8ent to the contract between Collier County and Better Roads,
Inc.
Mr. George ~eller, President of Collier County Civic Federation,
.tated that this is the same firm that came before this Board when Sea
Con could not get insurance. He noted that ~ea Con asked for a week's
delay and Better Roads had stated that they could deliver iamediately.
He indicated that the County should deal with everyone based on price
and he does not feel that this firm should be given an extension.
Co..issioner Shanahan stated that at this time, it does not appear
that the Board has any alternative.
Mr. Olliff stated that the County needs fill material at this time
and it this extension 1s not approved, then the County would have to
go through a re-bid process which will set everything behind further.
Be noted that at this time, this is the best option available to the
County.
C t-iOD8'r tP!.....h..... 8O98d, eec;0Dðed by CO88.i..10D8r -..tgb1:
8Dd C8rriell -t-.aly .10, that ÖMt conn-act ez1:8'D81on betI¡M8I1
Co1l1eJl" Co8D1:y .... "1:1:er Ro8d8, Inc., re 81d ."-1288, be ....,.¿w...4..
01
Page 3ð
-,-, , ,-"".-.,-----
-,- ------- "
MAY 9, 1989
I~~
ArC't'X08 Pr..uI ,,"'UWDIQ CAItLSO. CO1tPORA'fIO. un 'I'D DAL'lII un PU'8t.IC
8D'9'ICD 8U:ßoD1R 1'ItO.78C'f - &.I"'rKUvlW
County Manager Dorrill stated that this item was discussed briefly
and the Executive Summary now indicates the points of agreement to
effectuate a termination for convenience of the Carlson Corporation
fro. its contract to build the Health and Public Service Building. He
stated that the general terms and conditions have been spelled out to
terminate the agreement with Carlson Construction, to pay them for
work that they have undertaken and retainage that they are legally
entitled to, to pay them a negotiated amount to demobilize and get off
the site, and to sign a full agreement at the original price proposed
by the second bidder which was H. D. Rutledge from Ft. Myers. He
stated that he has personally conducted reference checks concerning
H. D. Rutledge and is satisfied that they are capable of undertaking
this project. He stated that there will be a full assignment of all
sub-contractor agreements that have been undertaken, the County w111
be released from any and all claims arising from this action on the
part of Carlson Construction and its sub-contractors, and the final
reco..endation i. for the County, through the assistance of
Carlton-Fields, the construction attorneys, to investigate and report
back to the Board the feasibility of pursuing a claim against the Geo-
technical Engineer who designed the alternate foundation and piling
system. Me indicated that the final area involves the expedited
agreement jetween the County and the piling contractor to maintain and
recover to the extent possible the schedule for this project, adding
that the County Attorney has indicated that there are some legal docu-
.ents that need to be prepared bHt the Executive Summary ind1cates the
points of agreement ~nd the dollar amounts involved in the termination
of Carlson Construction. Me noted that the termination agreements
will be brought back to the Board on the Consent Agenda.
In answer to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler stated
that it is his recommendation to proceed in the manner as outlined by
J /1
Page 35
..-'-"<"-"-"'--" .',
.."--- .
.._-"_.__.._-~. ,
MAY 9, 1989
the County Manager.
Co..issioner Hasse questioned what will happen to the tiaetable,
to which County Manager Dorrill stated that presently the project is
about 14 weeks behind schedule and he is endeavoring to recover that
schedule and aaintain it to the extent that they can by having a
separate agreement with the sub-contractor who is doing the piling
work as opposed to waiting until H. D. Rutledge can get mobilized on
the site. He stated that the Contract would be a number of weeks
behind the original contemplated schedule. He stated that the piles
that are 1n the ground can be utilized in conjunction with the re-
design foundation plan.
Co..issioner Shanahan questioned if the amount that it is going to
cost the County is the difference between the original Carlson
Corporation bid, the new H. D. Rutledge bid, the demobilization costs,
and legal fees which is about $428,000, to which County Manager
Dorrill replied affirmatively.
CI t..iCllD8'r Sh--.h~ 8DV8d. 88COD4ed by CO8a1..iOD81" ..... aDd.
carr 1.. ......... i 1W"a81.., f / O. that the Board 1Idopt: a .ix .t:-.p action plan
- de8crJMd below aDd. direct 8tatt to t:ake the nec--..ry act:ica t:o
~" ÖI8 project::
1. Approve a sole source Geotechnical and Subsurface threshold
Engineering agreement with Ardemann and Assoc., Inc. for the
remainder of the project and authorize the Chairman to execute
the agreement on behalf of the Board. This firm is most fami-
liar with the site and existing conditions.
2. Approve in principle. the termination of the Carlson
Corporation and authorize the Chairman to execute such ter-
mination on behalf of the Board.
3. Authorize staff to negotiate with H.D. Rutledge Ii Sons, Inc.
(the second lowest bidder) for assumption of the construction
contract. Authorize the Chairman to execute said agreement on
behalf of the Board.
4. Authorize the expenditure of additional design fees under the
architectural contract for the redesign or modIfication of
foundation drawings.
5. Direct staff to remove the Carlson Corporation and its sub-
entities from the Collier County bidders list.
6. Direct staff to pursue any possible legal actions for the pur-
pose of recovering damages related to this project. II (
Page 37
-. '" ,..-", -"" .
-.----..-.--"- ,.----- ,-_. "'"
MAY 9, 1989
I aa ....
CC8DLIC"f WIm I'LORIDA STAn UIIIVmtSI'fT rem PItOVI8IO. ow DDU'fIOII
1Ø9JC88 - AorIO'_..AU
Assistant to the County Manager Olliff stated that this was added
to the agenda in order for the Board to consider this contract prior
to the Co..issioners going to Tallahassee for legislative days. He
stated that if the Board would consider approving this contract and
setting up the meeting with Mr. Pelham then the Commissioners would
have the ability to say that Collier County has done everything that
they could have done. He stated that in dealing with Mr. Pelham, it
it was felt that .ediation was not a good idea, then the contract
could be broken and the County could go forward with the adainistra-
tive hear1ng processes. He stated that he felt it would be a ~ood
strategic .ove.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that there is a termination provi-
sion that states that either party may terminate this agreement with
or without cause. He noted that service rendered up to that point
would have to be paid for, but if the Commission decides in two weeks
that this is not what they want to do, there is that right to ter-
.inate the contract. Me stated that he has gone over the pros and
cons of this contract and he is willing to recommend that the Board
enter into the aediation contract, adding that it is to the County's
benefit as long as they can step out of the contract whenever they
want.
Comaiss10ner Saunders stated that based on the County Attorney'S
reco_endation, he had indicated that he woulá vote in favor of this
contract, but he has changed his mind again. Me indicated that the
oiggest part of this contract is the mediator spending time try1ng to
find out what the issues are and what has been done.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that this is one of the .oat criti-
cal parts of this contract and is one of the things that the mediation
provides that the administrative hearing does not provide. He stated
that the Coma1ssion and staff will have the mediator that they can
I '1 ~
Page 38
. ------..,.".-.
, ,,--
._-_.,~--,-"... "
MAY 9, 1989
talk inforaally to and can aaJce clear to him how unhappy the County is
with this situation. He stated that he sees this as one of the advan-
tage.. He stated that $23,000 is not significant in light of what has
been spent over the past 18 months in staff time alone. He stated
that it i. not a detriment to the County financially.
C ri..iooer ~h.., 8O98ð, M<;0Dðed by Co8a1..10D8r JIa88e aDd
carried all, (c-.i_iOD8r 8..mder. opp0ae4), that the con~ with
.lor1å Stau UniV'8rait:y tor provi.ion of 88dia1:ion aervi~ be
-- L_I.".
Page 39 /1q
--'--'.""'-'.'"." ,_.".,."M_"_-
MAY 9, 1989
1 a. ." 1A1
-~~ _pot_..... "'189 UD "'172 - ADOPTED
C t ..1 oaer ..... 8D91td. eeccmded by Co8a18.ioner ~Jght IIDd
carr1.ed --t--ly 410. that Badge t A88nd88n t . . .. U 9 IIDd. 8.. 1 7 2 be
adopt...
... ec-.1_ioaer Goodnight: 8D91td. seconded by CO881_ioner
..... , IIDd. carr led 4 / O. that the following It:- UDder the
Cm I 111;1: ~- be appro"'~ IIDd/or adopted: ...
lu. nUl
aaourn08 "-117. AtrrHOJUZIJIO PltKLIXIJIAJrl ACCKPrUCZ o:r aoADIIAY UD
~a~.... I8.......-,,1 I. LADSIDK o:r II.&PI.&S A'f CI'f1WS GARDD8 P!l&SE I
&JrD IICCKPrDI8 IlAIJr'fDAJK.Æ 8OJID ftOII D8VU.0PD I'OR IlAIIITDAJICK o:r
x.""'__AA :roa IIInIftJlil o:r on YU.R: UD UCORDI.O o:r :rIIIAL PLA'f .-:ITH
;IX .1 ¡.øf.&1'X ems
Approve for recording the final plat of "Lakeside of Naples at
Citrus Gardens" and grant preliminary acceptance of the roadway,
drainage, water and sewer improvements in Phase I with the following
stipulations:
1. Authorize the recording of the final plat of "Lakeside of
Maples at Citrus Gardens."
2. Accept the Surety Bond(s) as security for the construction
and maintenance of Phase IIA and lIB.
3. Accept the Surety Bond as s~7Urity for the maintenance of the
infrastructure in Phase I until the Board of County
Commissioners grants final acceptance of all improvements of
Phase I.
4. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Construction
and Maintenance Agreement for the entire project and a
Resolution authorizing the preliminary acceptance of Phase I.
S. Preliminary acceptance of improvements in Phase I will not
become effective until water and sewer facilities have been
conveyed to the Collier County Water-Sewer District (or other
appropriate governmental entity).
6. That no Certificate of Occupany be granted for Phase IIA and
lIB, until the required improvements in Phase IIA and IIB
have received preliminary acceptance.
See Pages S 7../J. I -A,/~
/
It- .14.&2
øcœ.oDN O:r 'ßI& I't"AL PLA'f o:r DPA JUDGK OJrI'f On - .-:I'fII STIPULATIon
Approve the recording of the final plat of Napa Ridge Unit One
with the following stipulations:
1. Accept the Letter of Credit as security to guarantee comple-
tion of the Subdivision improvements.
¡ql
Page 40
-""",--,,"'----""
,
MAY 9, 1989
2. Authorize the recording of the final plat of Napa Ridge Unit
One.
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Construction
and Maintenance Agreement.
4. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the
required improvements have received preliminary acceptance.
See Pages 57-'&./-13..5
I~ nUl
JrDOI.ftI08 I-.-UI, IJft3USIJIQ 'fD DISTIJrØ SPKKD LIXI'f 0Ir L~Y....-i'OII
8DIJ) ....- ...... GAD PJJŒIIAY AJIJ) 'fD ~ OJ' ".".-.10. noli
'ßUsn (10 ) KU.88 I'D JrOUI( TO :roJn'Y (~O ) KILU I'D JrOUI(
See Pages .57- ~ II - C."J..
I~ n~l
."'-17--.1. W 'fIDE ~ LAIID LUSK WITII 'fD STAn OJ' I'LOJUDA
... &a .. -, III ;¡ or IIA2'VJt.&L DSOOJtC&S roa C a y ~ ~ BOA 'f a.uIP
See Pages ..5 7. lJ. I - 7), Jg'
11:- n6Dl
ACCU'fA8C8 OJ' nLICIJI JUDG.K - PII.I.U III 8DD FACILITIES
O.R. BOOK 1439 PAGES 2199-2210
11:- n.D2
11m "-'-1603, CDJIIc..u.s WOR 'l'D UTILITIES DIVI8Ioa. WA'l'D UD
~'lD DID'~¡8 - TO VARIOUS v...uuRS
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Apr il 17, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, bids were received for chemicals for the Utilities Division
until 2:30 P.M., April 28, 1989.
Bid #89-1403 was awarded to the following vendors:
A. Anhydroug Aaaonia No Bid
B. Allied Products
Quick Lime (CaO 90') $86.67/ton
C. B.P. Scientific, Inc.
Polymer (~A 253) $80.86/65 lb. bag
D. B.I'. Scientific, Inc.
Polyphosphate (RS-2) $29.76/60 lb. bag
E. B.P. Scientific, Inc.
Sodium Silicofluoride $17.50/50 lb. bag
F. Carbon Dioxide No Bid
G. R.I'. Scientific, Inc.
!aulsion Polymer POL-E-Z 2466 $69.667/5gal.
B. H.P. Scientific, Inc.
Dewatering Polymer (Emulsion)
POL-I-Z 675 $493.60/66 gal.
1. PB&S Chemical Company
Dewatering Polymer
(Dry) 6120 P $110.20/65 lb. bag
3. Carus Chemical Company
Pota.sium Permanganate 8420.06/330 lb. drua ¡qY
Page ~1
"--"._"""" "",, ,,---
MAY 9, 1989
I~ ft... C..... to .,œ)
Itea ftG8
8ID ""1888. ~JJ18 AJII) »8IDIrU wmm .:rar.. WOK 'fD CJOODLUm M'fD.
DI:8'f1ŒC'r TO R a- -_....r AlII) ASSOC. I. ø AIfJOJr'f 1101' TO II".." 828. .70
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily N~s on
March 21, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed ~ith
the Clerk, bids were received for Chlorine and Ammonia Feed system for
the Goodland Water District until 2:30 P.M., April 7, 1989.
I~ ft.-
BID ...-lSu. ~E 'fKLDC8'fRY .~ZIi.UI J'OIt 'fD GOODLAIID M'fD. DIS'fJUC"f
TO n.catM 8ØnCl IJI'GI8DJtS 18 U .uønrr .0'1' TO DCUD 818.700
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 21, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, bids were received for re80te telemetry syste8 for the
Goodland Water District until 2:30 P.M., April 7, 1989.
I~ ft..-J
~ - ~ CItOSS:møs. PIIASK I - SDID rACILITXU - IIX'f1I
..~
1. All legal docuaents are found to be legally sufficient by the
County Attorney.
OR BOOIe 1439 PAGES 2211-2220
Iu. ft..-
8m ....U82 raa PLQII8IJIØ SUl'PLIU I'OR 'l'D O'fILITXES DIVI8IOII -
~-WP TO Yu.IOUII YIYWUIIQI
I.egal notice having been published in the Naples Daily N~s on
March 13, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, bids were received for plumbing supplies for the Utilities
Division until 2:30 P.M., March 29, 1989.
Bid .89-1383 was awarded to Davis Meter and Supply, Southerctern
~1u.nicipal Supply, Sav-On Utility Supplies, Inc. and Florida Industrial
Products tor an estimated $198,000.
I tea ft 6IU
~ ~ - - .... 4 2 7 AlII) a I 2 I'OR IRJJU.&L LOTS A'f LAD 'fILI.n'OIm
IllliltrAraJr. 9" ... '_¡;AAX
See Pages _~7-£.J - £,~
I~ ft82
.u--a~ n II' ¡; AlII) ftA4\14UKf Jmm) I. 1t&r&K&JICJ: TO 'l'D LU.J: or
~¡;. III ~ un U"fA'fa TO AVA'fAit noPD'fIU. IIIC.
Iq~
Page 42
'" -.-".. ".,---.-..-
---"""- .- . .. "
MAY 9, 1989
See Pages ..57-r. 1- F. 4'
11:- n.u
=:; .a..= UD STAT\nVß DUD 111 KØDDCK TO 'fD SALa OJ'
111 un KS'fAn8 TO aMUJ) AJrD PKTLLI8 DIIDIS
See Pages .5 7- ~. I - }j. *
......
I~- n."
~~&-...:I ~ AJrD STA~Y DKKJ) 111 Jt&JrJl,lUUl(;K TO 'fD SALa OJ'
~......:Io.fY ø 8OIoD8II un P'fA'fØ TO 1m AJrD .JCTfCK ALLØ
See Pages £7- JJ. I - 1:1..3
.
It88 nØ1
~G8 89-1U "A)u)IJICI 01Ø W J'U8])S BY 'fD ISLE W c.&ftX nu
'-"81 ~..A. DI8'DIC'r XII ~ 1fI'fB OJU). 87-15
See Page J)~- J), I
It- n6J'2
~.- ¿A _¿-- COLLID BOAJm OJ' COOJn"l COIIMI8SIOIIDS &lID J'Xft
~CT8 SD'IICDfQ 'fD COLLIn CUUIIITI nu \,;U.;¡;~ JI8TU
Big Corkscrew
East Naples
Golden Gate
I_okalee
Ochopee
See Pages -57-9. / - 9-. $()
It88 .11
CDnnCA'fØ W CC8QCTI0JI TO 'fØ 'fAX ItOLLS
1988 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
lIos. 1988-108/111 Dated "/25-21189
Iu..1
msc.:p'.- "~IArv~K nt.KD AJrD/OJt. ~
There being no objection, the following miscellaneous correspon-
dence was tiled and/or referred as indicated below:
1. Public Notice dated 4/27/89 trom the Dept. of Army regarding
Perait Application No. 88IPP-21265 to construct a 3-aile road
extension to Vanderbilt Road and excavating a drainagelborrow
canal on the north right-of-way. xc: John Boldt; Bill
Lorenz; and Filed.
2. Letter dated 4/26/89 tro. Patrick Kenney, Environmental
Specia11st, DER, enclosing short form application File No.
11637945, which involves dredge and fill activities. xc:
Neil Dorrill; Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
3. Let:er dated 4/21/89 froa Patrick Kenney, Environmental
Specialist, DER, enclosing short tora application File No.
111639195, which involves dredge and fill activities. xc: Jqt
Neil Dorrill; Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
page.3
",---- ,,_. 'q .,..",.,."-
--~-
MAY 9, 1989
4. Me80ranðua dated 4/14/89 fro. Roxane DOW, DER, attaching a
copy of changes in Surface Water Quality Classifications
(Section 17-3.161), F.A.C. xc: Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
5. Letter dated 4/27/89 from Robert K. Loflin, Environmental
specialist, DER, enclosing short form application, pile No.
111639755, which involves dredge and fill activities. xc:
Nell Dorrlll; Bill Lorenz; and Filed.
6. Me.orandua dated 4/21/89 fro. Ronald F. Cook, CPA, Finance
Dept., to Robert Fahey, Solid Waste Director, regarding Solid
Waste Disposal Interi. Financial Statements for the period
ended March 31, 1989. xc: BCC; Lori Zalka; and Filed.
7. Me.orandua dated 4/21/89 from Ronald F. Cook, CPA, Finance
Dept., to Dan Pucher, Fleet Manage.ent Director, regarding
Fleet Manage.ent/Motor Pool Interim Financial Statements for
the period endel March 31, 1989. xc: BCC; Lori Zalka; and
Filed.
8. Me80randua dated ./21/89 fro. Ronald F. Cook, CPA, Finance
Dept., to George Barton, EMS Director, regarding EMS Interim
Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 1989. xc:
BCC; Lori Zalka; and Filed.
9. Me80randua dated 4/21/89 fro. Ronald F. Cook, CPA, Finance
Dept., to Michael K. Arnold, Utilities Director, regarding
Marco Water and Sewer District Interi. Financial State.ents
for the period ended March 31, 1989. xc: BCC; Lori Zalka;
and Filed.
10. I.etter dated 4/20/89 fro. Nancy J. Gunter, Legal Assistant for
Bruce D. Frankel, Esquire, of Goldberg, Goldstein & Buckley,
P.A., regarding Client: Harvey Gelber VB. Maples police
Departaent D/Accident 9/22/88. xc: Ken cuyler; and Filed.
11. Letter dated 4/24/89 fro. Nicholas C. Anthony, Ph.D., District
prograas Supervisor, HRS, advising that the Fifth Annual
Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Planning Council Meeting
will be held May 19th at the Naples Beach Hotel & Golf Club.
xc: Filed.
12. Minutes received and Piled:
A. 02/09/89 - Ochopee Fire Control Advisory Board.
B. 05/04/89 - Agenda for CCPC.
C. 05/02/89 - Agenda for Marco Island Bel1utification Advisory
Committee.
D. 04/13/89 - Fire Consolidation study Uroup and .127189
Agenda.
13. Notice to Owner dated 4/26/89 from B.C.H. Mechanical, Inc.,
advising that they have furnished HVAC for improve.ent of
Collier County Health & Public Service Building, under an
order given by The Carlson Corporation/Southeast. xc: Neil
Dorrill; Skip Camp; and Filed.
u. Notice to Owner dated 4/20/89 from Firm-Sloan Pump Company,
Inc. advising that they have furnished pump, power unit &
miscellaneous equipaent and services for Job 1:89-6, County
Barn Road, under an order given by T. A. Forsberg, Inc. xc:
Neil Dorrill; Skip Caap; and Piled.
15. Kotice to Owner dated 4/29/89 from Mid-Coast pluabing, Inc.,
advising that they have furnished plumbing for the i.provement
of Collier County Health & Public Services Building, under an
order given by the Carlson Corporation/Southeast. xc: Neil
Dorrill; Skip Ca.p; and Filed. /
Iq~
Page..
---,-".
MAY 9, 1989
16. Rotice of Hearing dated 4/26/89 to Florida Power Corporation
and FPL from Public Service Coamission regarding Docket Ro.
810098-EI, petition for approval of an increase in the accrual
of nuclear deco..issioning costs to be held on 5/25/89 in
Tallahassee. xc: Filed.
11. May 1, 1989 budget received from Sheriff Don Hunter for the
operation of the Collier County Sheriff's Office for the
fiscal year beginning October 1, 1989, and ending September
30, 1990. xc: Filed.
18. Second Draft of Rule 04£-61, received ./27/89 from South
Florida Water Management District regarding Works of the
District in the Lake Okeechobee Basin, proposed to implement
the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan for
Lake Okeechobee Water Qua11ty. xc: Neil Dorrill; Bill
Lorenz; and Fi]!d.
19. Order dated 4/24/89 from Twentieth 3ud1cial Circuit for Civil
3ury Trials regarding said Trials for the two-week trial
period co..encing May 25, 1989, by Hugh D. Mayes, Judge,
Circuit Court. xc: Ken Cuyler; and Filed.
20. Roofing Guarantee received 5/1/89 from Crowther, Inc. to
Utilities Department for Regional Water Treatment Plant
Expansion at 3851 Utilities Drive. xc: Mike Arnold, and
Filed.
21. Rotice dated 3/16/89 from U.s. Department of Transportation
regarding Urban Mass Transportation Administration Program
Guidance Checklist. xc: Jeff Perry; and Filed.
22. Notice dated 3/16/89 from U.S. Department of Transportation
regarding Urban Mass Transportation Regulations Checklist.
xc: 3etf Perry; and Filed.
..... ~: 12:1& P.M. - ~WUy.ned: 1:10 P.M. .~ whJch
~188 D8p1ty Clark Eraf~ replaced Deputy Clerk K8DyoD .....
-A1o'IUIC8 "'-A8XA'fI08 .mt SKLKC'fIOJI 01' U JDlGIJlKDIR ~~L'fAJrl'
... '1118 I8Ya.øI'I8II'f 01' 'fD 1,;UU.1 f 11& 'I'D IIAJIAGDID"f MU'fD PL&JI - POST,
8OCU.8T, SC1IVII . J1DOrI GAJI, Ille. - UJIDD .0. 1
Consul~8nt - L8r KnvirOt188l1tal, Inc.
Bob Westey, Assistant Vice President and Chief Scientist with La"
Environaental, Inc. expressed his appreciation for the opport~~ity to
appear before the Board of County Commissioners. He pointed out that
Jane Fitzpatrick, of the firm Henderson Young, and the law firm of
Rabors, Giblin, Steffens «Nickerson are part of the team that Law
Environaental put together for the purpose of this project. He empha-
sized that this team will provide overall management and support ser-
vices, as well as legal needs. He described the coordination of land
use and development while displaying a diagram. He stated that
Henderson Young will provide the financial analysis for capital impro-
Page .ð ¡q&
-"",..,-
MAY 9, 1989
v...nt, and lIabors I Giblin, Steffens & lIickerson will provide legal
8ervices necessary for drafting a stormwater utility building system
ordinance. He noted the basic approach recommended for study with the
8tor8Water utility is critical and will have to be modif1ed. He
explained that Law Environmental will focus on the Phase 2 part of
the water aanage.ent plan.
3ane Fitzpatrick of Henderson Young described the re8ponsibility
of Henderson Young in this study. She noted Young and Menderson will
prov1de economic analyses for the rate setting in the utility fee
structure. She explained the initial rate setting will be done imae-
diately in order to worL within the time frame the Board of County
Co..issioners set up so that certain projects will be completed by
August and October. She stated that a mechanism for on-going rate
.chedules will be developed, and as the master plan for basin studies
evolves, the Board will adopt certain levels and adjust rates accor-
dingly. She explained that generating revenue immediately allows the
County to recover the cost of the project and implement a lower fee.
She stated this can be achieved by examining and analyzing the poten-
tial of vested properties, small or large rate payers, low income
housing, senior citizens, direct credits for payers who make improve-
aents on their own and indirect credits for provision of needed
infra.tructure by other entities such as the South Florida Water
Management Di8tr~ct.
Ms. Fitzpatrick discussed investigation of the billing and collec-
tion issues proble~s that .ay occur. She noted alternative billing
procedures such as piggy-backing utilities to other utility entities,
and using current property tax billing process as a source or a spe-
cial assess.ent billing system. She described the organization and
staffing issues involved in setting up this utility. She explained
that Bob Nabors and Craig Stewart have worked with the County and
emphasized the legal support of Nabors, Gib11n, Steffens & Nickerson
1s 1.portant throughout the development of the rate structures and uti-
l1ty fees.
,Q1
Page .15
. ,~" "",."......"
",,"---- ...- -."..-.,
MAY 9, 1989
Ms. Fitzpatrick described Henderson Young's experience and quali-
fications, l.e. development of capital improvement element, parks and
library impact fees for Collier County, experience and familiarity with
county operations and local governments in Florida. She concluded by
noting that the stor8Water utility fee is a relatively new concept to
be developed and Law Environmental has the expertise to do this.
Mr. Westey stated that Ms. Fitzpatrick covered Phase I and Phase
II is in the proposal the Board of County Commissioners has in its
literature. He demonstrated their technical expertise by di&playing
a portion of a aap contdining a dataset built into a computer. He
stated that the computer reads the particular location and provides
details which enable them to solve the problem.
C088issioner Hasse questioned if they completed the Martin County
drainage system and Mr. Westey responded that the fundamental work was
accOllpl1shed. Coamissioner Shanahan questioned if that was a ð year
project, but Mr. Westey responded they have been working with them for
one year.
Co..issioner Saunders asked if Law Environmental presumes the
County has decided to pursue a stor~ater utility system? Ms.
Fitzpatrick responded that was the approach they were taking, and
Phase I would cover this. Colll8issioner Saunders noted the legal ana-
lysis proposed could be provided by the County Attorney. He
questioned their use of legal analysis with outside counsel, but he
indicated that was an unfair question. Mr. Westey noted the County
Attorney Cuyler would not have the range and expe~tise of Nabors,
Giblin.
Commissioner Shanahan questioned where their headquarters is
located. Mr. Westey responded Atlanta, the Tampa office has a staff
of 43, of which 28 are professionals, engineers and scientists and the
.aples office would provide technical support. He asked where 30hn
Driscoll resided, Mr. Westey responded "Tampa". Commi8sioner Hasse
asked haw many people would be stationed in Naples? Mr. Weøtey
answered one supervisor, 5 field support and 2 additional engineers
/qK
Page 41
,-,----
,--- - ,- -, ",-,""'-'
MAY 9, 1989
froa T&8pa &8 needed. Co..issioner Hasse questioned the timetable.
30hn Boldt, Water Management Director, responded that Water Management
set up a notice to proceed on June 14 with completion dates for Phase
I on September 1st and entire completion by December 1, a relatively
short period of ti8e. Co..issioner Hasse questioned if that would
pose a problem, to which Mr. Hestey said "it would be very tight".
C088issioner Shanahan questioned the revenues for Law
Envir01'Ul8ntal. Mr. Westey answered 120 million and goals are 3.0
8illion by 199ð.
co..issioner Saunder. noted profitability on engineering fir.. i8
8~, Mr. WestBY indicated environmental jumps to the 20's.
Co..i8sioner Saunders indicated he had some questions for staff.
Co..issioner Saunders reaarked to County Manager Dorrill that the
eaphasis from the presentation indicated a decision to proceed with
a 8torawater utility, prepare an economic analysis and rates, and
provided counsel to draft ordinances. He noted he thought that was
preaature. County Manager Dorrill responded that it was contained in
the RPP because the Growth Management Plan Capital Improvement Element
baa identified the proceeds from bonds or revenues as being the
funding mechanism for a variety of drainage and related improvements.
Co..issioner Saunders indicated he was not prepared to go with a
storawater utility, or subsequently outside counsel for drafting ordi-
nances. County Manager Dorrill responded that the Board of County
Co..issioners will have to resolve the funding options within each of
the sub-basins to give consideration to the storawater utilitf. Mr.
Boldt, responding to Commissioner Saunders question about the propo-
sals including counsel to draft ordinances, said "Yes, counsel will be
included to draft model ordinances. Commissioner Saunders reiterated
that the County Attorney's Office can review the ordinance and adapt it
to the County's circumstances.
CH,.-1t8Dt - ..1. 1IoDt:- a .\88O(;i8t:-
Stanley Role, principal engineer with Role Montes & Associates,
expressed his gratitude to the Board of County Commissioners tor the
¡qq
Page .8
-- -,,-,-'-'-"--'.-
MAY 9, 1989
opportunity to aaJce this presentation. He explained this proj~ct
would include Chris Hagan of Hole Montes, Dan Brundage, of Agnol1,
Barber and Brundage, the engineer who will handle water resources per-
sonnel, Forest Banks, President of Johnson Engineering, Itevin Erwin of
Erwin Associates who will handle environmental work, and Milo Priede of Camp
Dresser & Mcltee who will handle funding. He pointed out that funding
and engineering are the 2 phases they will concentrate on. He. ellpha-
sized that Camp Dresser does no private work in Florid~ and private
clients will be unable to influence recommendations fro. Mole &
Montes. Be pointed out the study area will be divided into basins, as
displayed on the map, wlth the locations of boundaries fro. th~
four watersheds. He discussed Johnson'study of the Golden Gate
watershed for the Big Cypress Basin included designing weirs, back
pu8ping puJlping facilities to raise water levels wt,ile improv1ng
drainage, and their use of computers to determine how high water
will rise during stor.s.
Mr. Bole stated that another phase is to identify existing
dr.inage facilities and the last phase is to estimate the cost of the
new facilities in each of the basins. Me concluded by noting that all
of this 8Ust be done without adversely impacting th6 water resources
and Erwin Associates handles this phase. He stated this is a high
priority project for Hole, Montes and their team, and assured the
Board aanageaent of the group will not be a problem.
Milo Priede of Camp Dresser & McKee explained that the key point
is looking at the complexity of stormwater management. He pointed
out that federal permits, and legislation for stormwater bills
require dealing Kith long ter. co.plex conditions that will ch6nge
with land use. He noted surface, groundwater and ecological factors
are critical to Collier County as well as establishing a reliable
funding .echanis.. He stated that their experience in Sarasota,
Hillsborough, Manatee and Lee counties will be a great advantage. He
illustrated that optimizing resources was apparent in the $1,000,000
grant they obtained for 3acksonville (Duval County) through SWIM .oney
JOb
page.9
-, -.--.---------------.-.' ," "",-""."""..,.".--
"'--" -.
MAY 9, 1989
appropriated froa the legislature to the water aanagement district.
Be eaphasized Collier County's priorities must be understood and artl-
culated to the right people. He noted that their databases can be
integrated with the Collier County Tax Collector's. Be concluded by
detailing a fee and lieu process that can be integrated into the
Ordinance to finance capital iaprove.ents. He indicated that the
revenue base generated is substantial and can be leveraged in the form
0 f revenue bonc18.
Co..issioner Saunders asked tor an explanation of what the other
tiraa are going to be doing. Mr. Hole explained that Caap Dresser
will handle funding, a teaa analyzing the data will be handled by
engineering, and Johnson will test the data and Camp Dresser will
pr10ritize the data.
Co..issioner Saunders inquired about the environaental
aasessaents. Mr. Hole responded that Kevin Erwin has mapped aost of
the area and will analyze the effect of natural systeas on watersheds.
He suaaarized by noting that it is now the Board's decision as to who
they want to do business with. He eaphasized that coapetence and
c088itaent are the two things to be considered and noted that Hole
Mont.s has years of experience in Collier County with water resource
issues.
Co..issioner Hasse questioned it the continuing activity in
Collier County will aaJce hi. too busy to handle this? Mr. Bole
replied that he is far too busy to handle the engineering eleaent of
this job without bringing in other people. Me explained that the
group he put together will be able to handle this project even though
the schedule is extremely tight. Collllllissioner Hasse asked it he can
handle this job i~ an expeditious manner and if he was on schedule
with soae of the jobs he is presently handling? Mr. Hole replied that
they have never failed 1:0 complete a contract on time and on budget,
but he indicated he did not know about the scheduling tiaetable for
the Transportation Department, but they are ahead on some of the uti-
lities work and behind on others. A discussion followed about the
Page ðO dol
- - ,---..------
.. _. .,-
---"---,,.-,-_..,-,.._,- .-
MAY 9, 1989
&8OUDt of people involved on the team for this project.
Co..issioner Shanahan asked what experience Kevin Erwin has? Mr.
Erwin responded his fira is located in Fort Myers and has 12 ecolo-
gists and computer scientists. He indicated that since the early '70s
he has worked in every drainage basin in Collier County either for the
federal, state, county or private developers. He stated that his
fira did developaent work for DRI's, all the work for the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service on the new Florida Panther Wildlife Refuge and
they are f..iliar with the natural syste.. in Collier County and water
aanageaent issues. He ~xplained they will evaluate the future impacts
or enhanceaents of the water aanagement facilities when they are
constructed.
Co..issioner Goodnight noted that one person on the selection com-
aittee was unable to check references because the names and telephone
nuabers were incorrect. Mr. Hole responded that Scott Gilbertson was
the person they could not check. He stated that Mr. Gilbertson is in
charge of water resources work in Lee County and reachable through
that telephone nuaber; Forest Banks will comment on that. Mr. Banks,
Pres1dent of Johnson Eng1neering, stated that Scott Gilbertson is the
Transportation Planning Manager for the Lee County Departaent of
'fransportation and the boss on the surface water aanagem~nt program
Johnson Engineering is doing in Lee County. Me pointed out that they
have worked with Stanley Mole for years and nobody is better known and
aore respected in the water aanageaent area of work in Southwest
Florida than he.
Co..issioner Saunders asked 30hn Boldt, Director of Water
Manageaent, if their presentation changed any concerns of Staff? In
particular Co..is_ioner Saunders inquired about the magnitude of the
project in Lee County and time requireaents, the conflicts of interest
and the Transporation Services Division and Utility Div1sion's com-
aents ~oncerning lateness on their projects. Mr. Boldt responded that
there was no evidence of any change.
..... ..12111: 2:10 P.M. - ~UU.~ 2:20 P.M. ....'
..... 81 JO:t
"-.'-"--.-"-'-'--- ~ ,,-."-- "."-".".,,.--,.
MAY ". U..
A short discussion about the method of tallying the votes
followed. County Manager Dorrill stated the best method is to vote
nuaber 1, 2 or 3 individually to avoid a tie vote, and collectively
the teaa that receives the lowest nuaber of points is selected.
c-.l ~ - ro.t. 8a.ckl". 8çbah . .7erniCI8D. IQ(;.
.7on Dyer, EnvIronmental ServIces Director representing Post,
Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. presented hi. qualIficatIons to the
Board for consIderatIon. He emphasized that the presentation would be
identical to the one given to Staff, but not as lengthy due to the time
ele_nt. He indicated ~hat he lives and works in Collier County and
has been a resident of Collier County for a number of years. He
poInted out that all vIsuals shown are photographs specific to Collier
County. He stated he is confident that his team can meet the time
fraae necessary and described the members who will work on the pro-
ject. He informed the Board that Steve Linhart has 14 years of storm-
water aanageaent and facIlIty planning experience; and Hector Seer Is
in charge of the regulatory policy and ordinance issues and will draft
the ordinances should the County decide to go into a stormwater uti-
lity operation. He noted that Bill Circe, the Executive Vice
Pres1dent and ChIef Operating OffIcer of Post, Buckley was also pre-
sent.
Hector Seer, President of Water Resources Associates, stated his
co..it..nt in the State of Florida started in the 1980's and extended
to work in Pinellas Park, Tampa and Fort Myers. Me indicated that in
setting up the drainage division and stormwater management program for
the City of Tampa, he worked closely wIth 30hn Scheer. He discussed
the hydrologic cycle (rainfall running off the land and evaporating
back Into the atmo~phere) as opposed to John Scheer's Illustration of
a hydrological cycle where communities suffer from continuing
drainage probleas over a long period of time. He described a cycle of
rainfall and thunderstorms that create floods, followed by droughts that
cause apathy in the community until another flood occurs. He empha-
sized that stor.water management and its financing strategy is
Page!52 Jog
",",",' ,.",.
--_."--",,,-, . .
MAY 9, 1989
nece.sary to break that cycle. He noted that there are 3 issues of
vital concern: 1) people working on this project; 2) the process
eaployed, and 3) the product provided. He discussed the financial
analysis process and the resulting financial products. Me noted his
background included 5 years as Drainage Utility Manager for the City
of Bellevue in Washington, setting up stormwater programs until he
started his own fira, because he preferred developmental work. He
eaphasized that he only sets up stormwater programs and financing. He
stated that he will develop a financing and prograa strategy tailored
to Collier County. He pointed out the functional requirements
include adainistrative planning and engineering in terms of design;
regulation and enforcement, day-to-day mainten~~ce and operations, and
aost iaportantly, capital improvements. He explained a funding stra-
tegy will then be iapleaented to suit Collier County's needs. He
stated that a range of funding mechanisms will be evaluated such as a
storawater utility, construction fees, impact fees, and other
aethods. He indicated the process of recommendations, review and
approval will then give you the opportunity to aaJce a decision.
('f8p8 ft - Jlllrtial -.l~lcm)
Steve Linhart apprised the Board that he will be responsible for
the storawater engineering and aanageaent aspects giving requirements
necessary for constI'Uction, replaceaent, operation and maintenance of the
progr.. developaent. Me noted that Collier County is unique because,
although large in size, most of the population is centered around the
Kaples urban area, and the unincorporated area is developing towards
Golden Gate, Marco, and Immokalee. Me spoke about the Growth
Manageaent Plan in relation to level of service issues that aust be
addressed. He emphasized that different standards exist for developed
and undeveloped areas, depending on land uses and existing problems.
He noted that all the basins of the study area aust be mapped in order
to provide newer and bigger facilities and replacement of some inade-
quate facilities. He noted iaaediate access both on the area
displayed on the map and the per~itting center can be provided by
j-o4
Page ð3
.._"_."._",","-,,
MAY 9, 1989
overlaying the inforaation on the existing GIS syste.. He explained
the basins in unincorporated areas have unique characteristics and the
flow aust be controlled because of aangroves, water quality and out-
falls. Be concluded that no general approach can be used and ana-
lyzing these basins will require development of appropriate stor.
water engineering criteria, standards and procedures controlling
growth both now and in the future. He reported that their analysis
of areas displayed on the chart, indicate the time period criteria can
be _to
hpI .. ( p8rt tal 8al ~ Ion)
Bector Seer suaaarized by e.phasizing the enthusias. and expertise
this teaa would bring to Collier County. He set forth parallels bet-
ween reaponsibility for allocation of resources, their staff, their
streaalined organization, commitaent, expertise in stormwater and
finance programs and coapletion of this schedule in 4 aonths with a
custoaized and personalized project. He recounted their experience
in Collier County and their commit.ent to provide a good, solid
progr- that will aeet its needs.
co..issioner Hasse questioned where are Post & Buckley? Mr. Seer
replied that the fir. was founded 30 years ago, they are the second
generation of ownership.
The Post Buckley staff members approached the podiua in response
to questions froa the Board of county Commissioners.
In response to Commissioner Hasse's question concerning work done
in the Collier County area, they responded th.t they have a current
1nvolve.ent in the Pelican Bay operation for a wayte treaaent plant,
they were involved in construction of the expansion of 1-1&, they have
a field office in Golden Gate and in the early 1980's they were
involved in a wastewater treataent plan of raw water for Collier
County. In response to Commissioner Hasse's question about the time
schedule, they responded that would not be a problem and they had
enough staff to Beet the deadline and no other comaitaent would
coapro.ise this project. In response to Commissioner Hasse question
/
Page ð. }O~
---,,---_. -. . -.--..----- -,- ø..' --,------'--"-' -",~,_.,-,
MAY 9, 1989
abou~ environaental considerations, they notðd Steve Linhart's exper-
ti... In re.ponse to Commissioner Saunders' inquiry about funding
alternative.; Post Buckley responded that this could be acco.plished
by integrating a design rate structure with .onthly service charges:
by ...e.._nts, or .odifications of rate structures, or by surcharges
and ditferential rates.
Coaai.sioner Saunders stated that a strong feeling in the co.-
aanity exists that people do not want to pay for infrastructure needed
by new residents. He indicated new residents should pay their fair
.hare and a .iaple fee will not fill the bill. Post Buckley responded
that this is precisely why a custo.ized, personalized plan is
nece.sary. Co..is.ioner Saunders asked how they would accomplish
that? Post Buckley explained that new facilities could be paid for by
future residents by deter.ining how 8Uch additional revenue would be
required. They said that this could be acco.plished by potential
..ses...nts, and charges for current and future residents.
Co..issioner Saunders inquired 1f Post Buckley had any objection
to working 1'ith the County Attorney's Office on the drafting of ordi-
nances? Post Buckley responded that they would be very comfortable
with that and noted that the use of staff will keep the cost down.
Co..issioner Shanahan asked how Post Buckley as a single team com-
pares against the other fir.. who use a aulti-co.pany approach? Post
Buckley responded that a streamlined .anagement approach with team
experti.e is the answer.
Co..issioner Saunders commented that although ti.e was of the
e..ence, quality is .ore of a concern than timing. Post Buckle",
assured the Board of County Commissioners they could do the job well
in. aonths, but 6 .~nths would give them more opportunity to inter-
face with Collier County's Staff. They noted that this would also
eli.inate stress caused by fast tracking. Commissioner Saunders
pointed out that perhaps Staff needs to rethink the time schedule as
it i. iaportant to Bake sure the project is done correctly.
Co..i.sioner Shanahan and Commissioner Hasse concurred. Post Buckley
Page &ð )O(¡
--".,-----' .,.'.'--
MAY 9, 1989
explained that they prefer a fast track position, but emphasized that
a cost effective quality product is their goal.
...
County Manager Dorrill noted no ballots were provided and asked
each Co..issioner to use a sheet of paper. Commissioner Saunders
explained that #1 is first ranked, 1:2 second ranked, etc. and the
the tire selected will have the lowest number of points.
Commissioner Saunders requested a short discussion period. He
indicated comfort level with each firm was important and that could be
a~hieved by presentations before the Board of County Commissioners.
He stated he agrees with Staff's recommendation of Post, Buckley,
Schuh & 3ernigan for two reasons: 1) Mr. Seer's national experience
with funding and economics and 2) no potential exists for conflict ot
interest. He pointed out the County Attorney's Office is capable of
preparing ordinances, and conf Uct of interest is a major concern to
hi. because of the public's perception that planning functions are
pertor.ed by firms representing individual developers.
County Manager Dorrill stated that each of the Commissioners must
ini tial their selection and give them to Water Management Director
Boldt.
Mr. Boldt announced all the Commissioners were in agreement, Post
Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan was #1, Hole Montes was 1:2 and #3 Law
Environmental.
County Manager Dorrill indicated the County will enter into nego-
tiations with Post Buckley, Schuh & 3ernigan and bring the contract
back to the Board of County Commissioners for execution.
Commissioner Saunders declared the record should reflect that the Board
of County Commissioners' agrees with Water Management Staff's
reco..endation.
...
Page ð6 Jo1
.._---,,--"" ,.",.,."""."""-'
---- --."
MAY 9, 1989
There being no further busines8 for the Good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Ti.e: 3:15 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/
BOARD OF ZOJfIJfG APPEALS lEX
OFFICIO GOVERNIJfG BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UJfDER ITS
CONTROL
CHAIRMAN
ATTES¡: \h,~ni; ,
.7~ C.' GILE#/ )!LERK
; '~ <~
~,r :',,",~-27~~£}C
//:~se ai~t~ approved by the Board on ;;J::??7 ..3~ /Yel)?
'/,f'~
as present.a',\' or as corrected.
Page 51 /toi
--,,- . ----""'-""'" ,.,-'"