Agenda 01/28/1997 R COLLZER COU'~I~
COM~ISSIONERS
Bo~aD o?
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 28, 1997
9:00 a.m.
NOTICEI AL5 PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM
M~ST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAXING.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT
ON THIS AGENDA ~fUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH
EXPLANATION TO T~E COUNTY HANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR
TO THE DATE OF T~E I~EETING AA~D WILh BE HEARD UNDER
"PUBLIC PETITIONS".
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO A~PEAL A DECISION OF THIS
BOARD WIL~ NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING
THERETO, AND Ia~REFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD 0FTHE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD
INCLUDES TH~ TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON W~ICH ~a~
APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
AL5 REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WIL~ BE LIMITED TO FIVE
(5) MINUTES UNLESS PE~ISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS
GRANTED BY THE CKAIRMAR.
ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE
AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMHISSIONERS' OFFICE
LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M.
2.
3.
4.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF AhLEGIANCE
APPRQVAb OF ~G~T~AAND CONSENT AGENDA
~PPROVAL OF MINI~TES
January 7, 1997 - Regular meeting.
PROCbAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS
A. Proclamations
B. ~erv~ce Awards
Sue Filson - Board of County Commissioners - 15 years
Adelaide Dully - Solid Waste Administration - 10 years
Raymond Barth - Colle6~ion-SCWWTP - $ years.
C. ?resentations
Betsy Perdichizzi, President of Marco Island His=orical
Society, reimbursement of TDC funds for Key Marco Ca~
Exhibition.
6. APPROVA~ OF CLERK'S REPORT
A. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES
1. General Fund (001)
2. Community Developmen= Fund (113)
3. Facilities C~ns=ruction Fund (301)
1
January 28, 1997
?. pVBLIC PZTITIONS
(1) A prelimtna~ revie~ of residential densi:y wi:bin
the coastal urban area as recessed by ~he Soard of
County Comm~ssioners as par~ of ~he Evaluation and
Appraisal Repor~ (~).
C. PUblIC
E. ¢OUNTYMANAG£R
(1) Amend Tourist Development Council
Category C Grants.
Guidelines for
(2) Request Direction to Amend Category A Tourist
Development Guidelines to Include Other Inlet and
Inland Waterways not Currently Specified.
(3) To Approve Funding Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging
$380,600, T-Groin Construction in Capri/Big Marco
Pass $363,200, and Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging
$13,830. Category A Tourist Development Funds."
(4} Consider Amending Ordinance 92-60 Relating to the
L~vy of 2% Tourist Development Tax to Include the
Reconstruction of a Public Fishing Pier.
(5) Review of 5 Year Non-CEE Capital Improvement Plan.
9. ¢0VNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
(A) Resolution to adopt Collier County Streetscape Master
Plan.
10. ~OA~/) QF COUNTY COMMIS$IONTRS
A. Discussion of County Manager position.
B. Appointment of members to the County Government
Productivity Committee.
C. Discussion regarding appointment of interim County
Manager.
11. OTHER CONSTITL'TIONAL OFFICERS
COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS
PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE I{EARD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS
12. ~DVERTISED p~LIC HEARINGS o BCC
A. COMPR~ENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
B. ~ONINGAMENDMENTS
January 28, 1997
(1) Petition PUD-81-]O(1), Peter L. Breton representing
Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc., requesting to
amend the Lely Palms of Naples PUD document for the
purposes of replacing fifty of the approved "future
residential apartments" with 50 assisted living units
with a common kitchen facility serving the 50 ALF
units and to add an adult day care facility. The
petitioner is also requesting to change the setback
along the east property boundary from 30 feet to
feet and to revise the master plan to reflect the
changes for property located on the south side of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road (C.R. 864) in Sec. 21, TS0S,
R26E.
(2) Petition PUD-96-14, Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of
Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., and George
Varnadoe of Young, vanAssenderp and Varnadoe, P.A.,
representing Sunco Building Corporation, requesting a
rezone from "A" and "A-ST" to PUD to be known as
Island Walk Planned Unit Development for a maximum of
2,100 dwelling units and a fifteen acre town center
for property located on the north side of Vanderbilt
Beach Road approximately one mile east of 1-75 in
Sets. 33 and 34, T48S, R26E, consisting of 705 acres,
more or less. (Companion to Agenda Item 12C.(2)
(Continued from the meeting of 1/14/97)
(3) Petition PUD-87-31(3), Community Development and
Environmental Services Division requesting an
amendment to the Gadaleta PUD, Ordinance No. 88-50,
for the purpose of designating two acres 6~ the
Gadaleta PUD as a commercial tract entitled to all of
the C-2 uses for an area previously zoned C-2 prior
to the amending of Ordinance 88-50.
(1) An Ordinance providing funding for the Juvenile
Assessment Center and Suspension Program through
County Delinquency Prevention fines pursuant to
Section 775.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by
Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida: providing for a
mandatory cost of three dollars ($3.00) ~o be
assessed against every person convicted of a
violation of a criminal statute, a municipal or
county ordinance, or a traffic offense in the County;
providing for the court to assess the mandatory cost
of $3.00 and the Clerk of the Circuit Court to
collect the mandatory cost; providing for the
collection of costs and disbursement of funds by the
Clerk to the Sheriff; providing the responsibilities
of the Sheriff; providing for conflict and
severability; providing for inclusion in the Code of
Laws and Ordinances; and providing an effective date.
(2) Petition DRI-96-1, Alan R. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson,
Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Sunco
Building Corporation requesting development approval
of the "Island Walk" a mixed use development of
regional impact containing a maximum of 2,100 mixed
dwelling units, recreational, open space, and
community service element, a "town center" providing
retail, recreational and community sez~ices, and
multipurpose green space located on Vanderbil= Beach
Road (C.R. 862) between Interstate 75 and C.R. 951,
more specifically including all of Section 33. T48S,
R26E, and part of Section 34, T48S, 226£, consisting
of 705~ acres. (Companion to Agenda Item 12B.{2)
(Continued from the meeting of 1/14/97)
3
January 28, 1997
(3) A Resolution of the Board of County Com=£ssicners of
Collier Coufity, Florida, Co correct a scrivener's
error in the Woodlands DRI Development Order,
Development Order 96-2, which amended Development
Order 86-1, Sec:ion S, Transports:ion. relating :o
addition of a roadway segment for moni:oring purposes
and to correct legal participation by :he Department
of Community Affairs in any no:ice of proposed change
process.
(4) Recommendation :ha: the Board of County Commissioners
adopt an Ordinance providing for mandatory street
numbering of all stz-uctures and the es:abl£shing of a
grid pa:tern for street numbering.
(S} Recommendation to Adopt a Resolu:ion Approving
Amendments to :he Fiscal Year 1995-1996 Adopted
Budge:.
(6} Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Approving
Amendments :o :he Fiscal Year 1996-1997 Adopted
Budge:.
(7} Recommends:ion that the Board of Coun:y Commissioners
adopt an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 89-11, the
Beach and Wa:er Safe:y and Vessel Control Ordinance.
(8) The Collier Coun:y false alarm ordinance; providing
deflni:ions~ providing responsibility for security
alarm systems and false alarms; required response~
providing for warning or cite:ion of raise"alarm
viola:ions~ providing for false alarm repot: fo.-ms
and corrective ac:ion; providing for false alarm
fines~ excep:ions~ providing enforcement and penalty
provisions~ providing for conflic: and severabili:y;
providing for inclusion in :he code of laws and
ordlnances~ and providing an effective date.
(9} Petition SNR-96-10, requesting a street name change
from Rifle Range Road to The Lord's way which s:ree:
is located east of C.R. 9S1 in Sec. 14, TSOS, R26E.
13. ~QARD OF ZONING APPEALS
A. ADV~RTZ~ED PUBhIC HEARINGS
(1) Petition V-96-28, John Grissom of Dia=omd Pool
Construction, Inc., representing Landmark
Communities, requesting a 1.94 foot variance from the
required S fooC rear setback to 3.06 fee: for
property located at 3810 Gro:on Court0 fur:her
described as Lo: 189, Queens Park a: Lago Verde.
~hase 7, in Sec. 18, 'TSOS° R26E. (Continued
mee:ing of 2/2S/9~)
B. OTHER
14. ~QA~D OF COD~ COM2~ISSIONERS' CO~2<UNICATION$
15. ~TAFF'$ COH~NICATIONS
WORKSHOP[ Economic Diversification Program, Phase II presented
by Council of Economic Advieors.
16.
CO~S~
&
4
January 28, 1997
Ail matters listed under this item are considered to be routine
and action will be taken hy one motion without separate
discussion of each item. X£ discussion is desired by a me--~er of
the Board, that £tem(a) will he removed from the Consent Agenda
and considered separately.
A. COM]~'~NITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
(11 Petition AV-96-036, recommendation to approve for
recording the final plat of 'Northshore Lake Villas
Replat' and approve the vacation of the recorded plat
of "Northshore Lake Villas'.
(2) Recommendation to approve the final plat of
"riddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek
Village".
(3) This item deleted.
(4) Water and sewer facilities acceptance for Pelican
Marsh, Unit Eight, Phase One.
(5) Recommendation to approve for recording the final
plat of 'Tarpon Cove'.
s. P~
(1) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Seryices
Agreement with Mumiston & Moore Engineers for work
associated with the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet
Management Plan.
(2] Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the
attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement
concerning the Max A. Masse, Jr. Comnunity Park
located on Golden Gate Boulevard.
(3) Approve a Budget Amendment recognizing carry forward
amounts from FY 1996 for Countywide ¢~P Projects in
Fund ~01.
{4) Approve Amendment No. ~ to Professional Agreement for
engineering services related to improvements a= the
South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility.
C. RV
{1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a request for funding for the construction of
a floating dock system to be located at =he Caxambas
launch facility. '.' ..
(2) Recommendation that the Board of County Co~nissioners
approve the budget amendment recognizing carry
forward within Fund 1]0 Golden Gate Community Center.
{]) Recommendation that the Board of Collier County
Commissioners confirm the selection of Dr. Charles
Konigsberg as the new Collier County Public Health
Department Director.
D. U V
(1] Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a First Amendment to Le~se Agreement between
Collier County and Roger Carvallo concerning =he
Finance Department office space.
January 28, 1997
Reco~mendation to declare County-owned property as
surplus and accept the offers received for the sale
of surplus terminals, keyboards, and microfilm
equipment under Bid #S96-2627.
(3) Reco~mendation ~o approve a ¢on~ract amendment with
PCA Solutions, Inc. to provide runout group health
insurance claims adjusting services.
(4) Recommendation to obtain Board examination and
approval of the sufficiency of bonds of County
Officers.
(1) Budget Amendment Report.
[1] ~1~--~---~: NEED MOTION authorizing the
Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of
the Public Defender for Case Nos. 96-8292-~'~
96'1708-CFA, 90-5736'TM, 82-227-MI, 90-1884 -CFA
96-7256'MMA, 95-5706-M~A, 96-6026'M~A, 96-12¢0-CFA
96-4464-F24A, 94-1437'CFA, 96-8808-f~4A, 96- 9035'~A
96' 8392'fL'~A, 96-8752'M~A, 96,4849'~/~A, 95-1007-CFA
96'4641'~A, 96-258-CFA, 96'901'CFA, 96'7231-~2~
9 S-2243 'CFA, 95 ° 1280-MMA, 96 - 759-CJA. 96 -7326 -~4A
96-8108-f~4A, 96°8906-MMA, 96'8935°~'"~A. 96- 5441'.%~A,
90' 1611-CFA, 90'1611'CFA, 90'1611'CFA, 90-1611-CFA.
RECOMHEND APPROVAL.
[2] -' w ".
Januar~ 28, 1997
AGENDA CHANTS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETIN(~
JANUARY 28, 1997
ADDs ITEM 8(A) (2) - WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
INDIAN WELLS GOLF VILLAS (STAFF'S REQUEST).
ADDs ITEM 8(B)(1) - APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER TO WORK ORDER
#ABB-FT-96-7 WITH AGNOLI, BARBER AND BRUNDAGE, INC. FOR CLAM
PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING. (STAFF'S REQUEST).
ADDs ITEM 10(D) - DISCUSSION OF LAKE TRAFFORD TASK FORCE
ASSISTANCE. (STAFF'S REQUEST).
CONTINUE ITEM 12(C)(7) TO 2/11/97 MEETING - RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE BCC ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-11
THE BEACH AND WATER SAFETY AND VESSEL CONTROL ORDINANCE
(STAFF'S REQUEST).
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Janua~ 28,1997
CLERK'S REPORT
6A.
Analysis of Changes to Reserves for Contingencies
General Fund (001) for FY 98/97
Community Development Fund (113) for 96/97
Facilities Construction Fund (301) for FY 98/97
ao., ~
JAN 2 8 1997
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO GENERAL FUND (001)
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES
Fo~ the meeting date of January 28, 1997
F~ 1996-97
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
Original Budget 10/01/96
Curt'ertl Balance 1/16/97
(Reductions) or increases as explained below
B.A.
Date Request
11.27.66
12-11-96
12-11-96
12-31-96
1-16-97
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS
Explanation
48 To repair the bottoms of the activity and plunge pool.
64 To pay Ut~fity expenses for Immokalee Ch~3d Care Center
68 To repair the Central Library Ch[fief
92 Reduce transfer to Road and Bridge due to additional
revenue received fro roadway sweeping and mowing.
1 I0 To execute the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement agreement
and releases with plantiffs no longer employed by EMS.
4,675,900
4,600,652
(7_5.~)
(Reduction)/
Increase
(t 6,500.00)
(11,000.00)
(14,475~00)
(42,770.00)
Amendments amounting to less than
$10,000 each: (No.: 29, 17. 68, 69, 51,)
(31,803)
Total Reductions
JAN 2 8 1997
ii I I II I III1~ I I III I llll III I IIII II -
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (1
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES
For the meeting of January 28. 1997
FY' 1995-97
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
Odginal Budget 10/01/96
Current Balance 1/17/97
(Reductions) or increases as explained below
Date Request
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS
Explanation
277.400
277,400
0
(Reduction)/
Increase
Total Reductions
0
N ~edmin~o~ 113_~I
JAN 2 8 9.0,°7
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION FUND (301}
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES
For the meeting date of January 28, 1997
FY 1996-97
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
Original Budget 10/01/96
Current Balance 1117/97
(Reduct.~ons) or increases as explained below
Dale Recj.~est
11-13-96
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS
Exp~anatlon
Amendments amounting to Jess than
$10,000 each: (No.: 25)
$ 294.400.00
292 199.00
{Reduction)/
Increase
S
(2.201)
Total reductions
JAN 2 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN THE COASTAL URBAN AREA AS
REQUESTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS PART OF THE EVALUATION AND
APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR).
OBJECTIVE: To review the issue of residential density within the Coastal Urban Area as identified in the
EAR and to seek direction from the Board of County Commissioners on any EAR based amendments of the
Comprehensive Plan with regard to density.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners, as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report
(EAR), directed staff to review residential density within the Urban Area. This review provides dwelling units
estimates at buildout for the Coastal Urban Area, Immokalee and Golden Gate Estates, it does not include
dwelling un[ts for property zoned agricultural or conservation which is located east of the Urban Boundary.
This review identifies the density of the Urban Area based on the completion of the zoning reevaluation
program and the existing zoning, including approved Planned Unit Developments and Developments of
Regional Impact. The vacant Agricultural property was evaluated based on the existing Comprehensive
Plan and through the Urban Area Buildout Study. The final portion of this report provides options regarding
a!ternatives to the existing residential density pattern.
Zoning Reevaluation Program
the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1989, Policy 3.1 k of the Future Land Use Element
contained a requirement that a Zoning Reevaluation Program be conducted to bring zoning that was
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan into compliance. The Zoning Reevaluation Program did not
address property that was improved, had vested dghts or would be incompatible if zoned to the density
permissible by the adopted Plan. The results of this 2 % year effort are listed below:
· Density reduction - 6,397 dwelling units
· Commercial land rezoned to non-commercial uses - 215 acres
· Industrial land rezoned to non-industrial uses - 0.89 acres
· Travel Trailer Recreation Vehicle Campground land rezoned - 632 acres
Properties were granted exemptions (754 acres) and exceptions (450 acres) as provided for in the Zoning
Reevaluation Ordinance. Approximately 72 acres were considered to be consistent under the 'Commercial
under Criteria" provision.
The impact of Zoning Reevaluation was limited. Of the 2,703 commercial acres outside of Activity Centers,
215 were rezoned, 572 acres were granted an exemption or exception and permitted to retain commercial
zoning. Improved property, which has a higher density or intensity than permitted under the current
Comprehensive is permitted to retain and rebuild in accordance with that zoning district. The Map series
(FLUE Map 9-13), Existing Zoning Consistent by Policy, identifies those properties that have a higher
density or intensity than the Comprehensive Plan would permit but are considered consistent because they
are improved, have vested rights, or have been granted an exception or exemption under the Zoning
Reevaluation Program (Policies 5.9, 5.10 and 5.11 of the Future Land Use Element).
AGEN D&I,T~M -
'IJAN 2 8 1997
Planned Unit Developments/Developments of Reglonal Impact
There are approximately 234 Planned Units Developments (PUD's) approved on 41,265 acres. The
breakdown on how the land uses are distributed and the amount of existing development is as follows:
Developed Approved
Acres Square feet Acres Square Feet
Commercial 242 3,979,152 2,169 14,720,008
Industrial 57 172,460 1,118 4,430,030
Golf Course 828 holes 6,820 acres
Conservation
20,129 acres
Residential
Developed Dwelling Units:
Single Family 10,592
Multi-Family 23,615
Hotel/Motel/RV 2,586
ACLF/Hospital 245
37,038
(32%)
Total Dwelling Units: 114,931
Table 1 identifies approved PUD's and provides the breakdown by land use type: commercial, industrial,
residential units, Adult Congregate Living Facilities, Hotel/Motel units, Recreation Vehicle units, golf course,
conservation. Tables 2 provides a listing of PUD's that have a density at or below 4.31 units per acre.
There are approximately 89 PUD's on 34,132 acres with a total of 88,571 units which are at or below a
gross density 4.31 units per acre. Table 3 lists those PUD's with a density level above 4.31 units per acre
There are 83 PUD's on 4,183 acres with the total number of dwelling units 26,386 with a gross density
between 4.53 and 23.44 per acre. Within all the PUD's, 83% of the acreage and 77% of the dwelling units
are approved for a gross density of 4 units per acre and below. Table 4 proved a listing of the 52 PUD's
that have been completed and provides a breakdown by type of land use and the gross density. Map I is
a general location map of the PUD's throughout Collier County.
There are 21 Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's) approved which include the following land use
types: 1,103 commercial acres, 287 industrial acres, and 60,641 dwelling units on 19,313 acres. Table 5
provides a specific listing of the land use type along with a locations map (Map 2 ). All of the DRI's, except
for Cedar Bay Marina which is zoned C-5, are also zoned PUD.
Development Potential on Agricultural Lands within the Urban Area
There are approximately, 18,800 acres of land zoned Agricultural within the Urban Area (see Map 3).
Under the current Plan, which are eligible to request the base density under the Density Rating System,
without any density bonus provisions. It should be noted that these are maximum densities which may not
be achieved on all properties and would be subject to zoning approval by the Board of County
Commissioners.
2
AGENDA.LT£1d
No. ~
JAN 2 8 1997
Agricultural Density Total
Acreage Per Acre Dwelling Units
West of Airport Rd. *
East of Airport Rd.
Urban Residential Fdnge
4,154 3 12,463
10,485 4 41,942
4,160 1.5 6,240
18,799 60,645
'Traffic Congestion Area
The maximt~m base density could be modified, if appropriate, by the Density Bonus Provisions which could
add to the base density.
· Affordable housing - 8 units per acre
· Residential infill - 3 units per acre
· Within Density Band - 3 units per acre
· Within Activity Centers - 16 units per acre
· Roadway access - 2 arterials or collectors - 1 unit per acre
· Transfer of Development Rights - 10% to 20% above district
Decrease in Density:
· Interconnection - (proposed for deletion in EAR) I unit per acre
Also within the Coastal Urban Area there are 1,217 acres of land zoned Estates (E) which permits one
dwelling unit per 2 ¼ acres. These properties are not part of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision and are
located on Map 3. The current Plan permits those properties to be eligible to request residential densities,
consistent with the density rating system.
Buildout Analysis
The purpose of the Urban Area Buildout Study is to assist in the development of a long range 'vision" of
Naples Urban Area with a specific focus on the infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate the
potential growth.
An important aspect in the development of this Study was public participation. During the data compilation
stage staff solicited input from the following group presentations including the Economic Development
Council, Contractors and Builders Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce, Greater Naples Civic
Association, Presidents Council, Collier County Planning Commission and included as part of the
Evaluation and Appraisal Report approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
Phase I of the Study was completed in March, 1994 and provided an estimate of buildout population for the
Coastal Urban Area. This estimate included those properties that had retained their development potential
after zoning reevaluation, existing zoning and agricultural property developed at the base density of the
Comprehensive Plan. These estimates were conservative and did not estimate the 'worst case" scenario.
Phase I estimated that the buildout of the Coastal Urban Area could accommodate approximately 275,607
dwelling units and a population of 458,001. If the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR)
medium range population estimate are realized this population could be reached in the time frame between
2019 to 2046.
AG£NDA JT£1~,
3 JAN 2 8 1997
Phase II of the Buildout Study represents an attempt to identify the infrastructure needs for the buildout
population. Table 6 contains a list of services necessary to support the buildout population of 458,000.
These estimates were provided by the service agencies and represent their estimate of necessary
infrastructure to serve that population. The Urban Area Buildout Study identified approximately 16,000
vacant acres zoned agricultural with a potential of 58,000 dwelling units.
The Urban Area Buildout Study did not analyze if the needed infrastructure could physically be provided or
if it was financially feasible. The 2020 Financially Feasible Plan identified a road network that could
potentially support 246,494 dwelling units and a population of 393,100. VVhat has not been thoroughly
analyzed is based on the level of development currently approved and permitted in the Comprehensive
Plan can the necessary infrastructure be provided long term to support that level of development.
The Capital Improvements Element provides a five year schedule of capital improvements to support
development. The Annual Update and Inventor,./Report identifies any deficiencies and provides
recommendations for funding to meet the adopted level of services to ensure concurrency.
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) contains an estimate of the potential buildout of both the
Golden Gate Estates Subdivision and the Irnmokalee Community. There are approximately 99,812 acres of
land zoned within the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision. For purposes of this report those Estates parcels
within the Urban Area are included in the Urban Area Buildout Study. An estimate for buildout of the
Southern Golden Gate Estates was not included because that area is currently proposed for purchase by
the State of Florida. There are approximately 55,640 acres of land zoned estates outside of the Urban Area
and north of Alligator Alley (I-75). At buildout this area could contain 18,547 dwelling units. The Immokalee
Urban Area contain approximately 17,542 acres and at buildout could accommodate 38,798 dwelling units.
Acreage
Buildout Estimate
of Dwelling Units
Coastal Urban Area
Golden Gate Estates
Immokalee Urban Area
80,000 275,607
55,640 18,547
17,542 38,798
153,182 332,952
During the preparation of the EAR report an analysis was prepared on the population estimates and
projections for Collier County. When the Comprehensive Plan was adopted the County requested and
received approval to use the high range BEBR estimates because during the 1980's the annual growth rate
was about 6% per year. In reviewing the actual population growth from 1986 to 1996 it has been
determined that the rate of growth has decreased to 4%, which is closer to the medium range BEBR
population estimates. Based on this information in July, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners
approved a new methodology for population projections which utilizes the high range BEBR growth rate in
the first 5 years and then uses the medium range BEBR growth rate until the year 2020. Graph 1 illustrates
the BEBR Iow, medium and high range population estimates to the year 2020. Scenario one represents
the population methodology adopted by the Board of County Commissioners.
EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE/DENSITY RANGE MAP
The final Map Series is an analysis of the land uses as approved under the current zoning
identify residential uses by density range; commercial uses; industrial uses; golf course, p;
conservation areas; community facilities/churches/schools, and agriculture. The Activity C
· The Mao~
rks, AG£N T
JAN g 8 1997
are also shown. Upon review of the map series it is apparent that a majority of the property is zoned for
residential at a density between 2-4 units per acre. There is limited agricultural land available within the
Urban Area; the vast majority of which is located at the eastern end of the Urban Area boundary along CR
951.
This Map Series identifies the propedies which could request building permits for development based on
their zoning district. The rate of development of these properties depends, in part, on the annual population
growth. Table 7 illustrates the Building Permit Data, by building type, for the years 1991 to 1996. Over the
last 6 years, residential permits issued have averaged 4,050 permits per year. The lower number of
residential permits were issued in 1991 and 1993, with the highest number issued in 1996.
CONCLUSIONS:
The following conclusions are provided from the data above.
· FLUE map series (9-13) identify those properties that have a higher density or intensity than the
current Plan would permit because of improved property, and properties granted exceptions and
exemptions under the Zoning Reevaluation Program.
· There are 114,931 dwelling units in approved PUD's, of which 32% of the units are developed.
· Within PUD's, 83% of the acreage and 77% of the dwelling units in projects that are less than 4 units
per gross acre.
· There are approximately 18,799 vacant acres zoned agricultural which may accommodate 60,645
dwelling units at the maximum base density, without utilizing any of the bonus density provisions.
· The Urban Area Buildout Study estimated the buildout population of the Urban Area to be 458,000 and
275, 607 dwelling units. Buildout could occur between 2019 to 2046 depending on the annual growth
rate.
ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives suggested are an attempt to identify potential options that may be available and do not
represent an exhaustive list. The feasibility of each alternative would have to be analyzed in more detail to
determine the impacts and overall consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
· Maintain the status quo and keep the Future Land Use Element regarding residential density the same.
· Reduce the size of the Urban Area. This would reduce the number of dwelling units from the potential
Urban Area intensities of 3 and 4 units per gross acre to 1 unit per 5acres. For each section of land
deleted from the Urban Area the density would be decreased from 1920-2560 dwelling units to 128
dwelling units.
· Reduce the maximum base density on Agriculturally zoned property east of Airport Road from 4 units
per gross acre to Urban Residential Fringe Area which allows one unit per 1.5 acres. This has the
potential to affect 10,485 acres of land which would reduce the number of dwelling units from a total of
41,942 to 15,728 dwelling units.
· Delete the Density Bonus Provisions and only allow increased density by transferring density from
another parcel with available units.
· Reduce the maximum base density from 4 to 3 units per gross acre. This would affect10.485 acres
with the potential to reduce the number of dwelling units from 41,942 to 31,455.
· Under the 'sunset" provision of the Land Development Code, reduce density (m existing ~
that has not commenced construction. This alternative would have to be researched in orde~ to ide,-~y
the reduction in the potential number of dwelling units.
· Promote increased density within Mixed Use Activity Centers. This could be
the overall base density and using a system of density transfer to the
5
Promote increased density on infill propedies to ensure compatibility. On smaller infill properties that
would have difficulty in developing at 3 or 4 units per gross acre a system of density averaging with
surrounding properties could be investigated.
FISCAL IMPACT: Should density and/or zoning be altered on any property potential litigation under the
Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Protection Act may occur (Section 70.001, Florida Statutes). The Act
provides:
When a specific action of a local government entity has inordinately burdened an
existing use of real property .... the property owner of that real property is entitled to
relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of
the real property caused by the action of the government as provided in this section.
There has been limited case law to interpret this legislation. Attachment I is a memorandum from Marjorie
Student, Assistant County Attorney, which outlines some of the concerns. Full legal ramifications should be
analyzed by lhe County Attorney's Office.
Additionally, potential positive and negative consequences of density reduction may be realized. These
impacts which may affect, but are not limited to, cost of land, housing costs and the tax base would be
analyzed as part of any proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: A review of any proposed amendment is required to ensure internal
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners provide direction to staff on any EAR
based amendments to the Future Land Use Element regarding residential density.
Prepared By:
' Bart~ara A. Cacchione, AICP
Comprehensive Planning Manager
___Ee.y_i_e. wed_B y: ~ ~
Donald W. Amold, AICP
Planning Services Director
~ DATE:~
Community Development & Environmental Services Division
6
'JAN 2 8 1997
PI. ~
FLUE Map Series (9-13) Existing Zoning Consistent by Policy;
Map 1, Location Map of Planned Unit Developments$ Map 3,
Agricultural and Estates Zoning in the Urban Area and the
Existing Zoning/Land Use/Density Range Map Series are
11" x 17" color maps that can not be reproduced for the
agenda packet. They will be provided under separate cover
to the Board of County Commissioners and are available to
the public in the Comprehensive Planning Section of the
Planning Services Department, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,
643-8400.
,.lAN ,g 8 1997
1997
i
I'
i~ I
:.JAN g 8 1997
2 8 1997
o!
'JAN 2, 8 1997
~ '-~ 0
'~ 0 (1)
t~? 2
DEVELOPMENTS
OF
REGIONAL
IMPACT
STAFF ~ MAP
WESTERN COLLIER COUNTY
RANCE$ 25.26 AND 27
~aple~ Airport Operztions p~r Ytsr ! 2S.000 ~20.000
Trm~l~r~aflon for the Disadvantaged ,MIJes or S~rvlce per Year ~50.000 !.900.000
Tr~nsportallon O[jglrway Travel) VcMcle ,Miles of Tntvtl per Day 3,904,39~ 8,?15,R90
Tr=anZlMr~tton (Tuel Consumed) Fuel Consumed per Day 216,911 gal 484,216 gal
Flr~ & Rescue
CI~' of Nap!es Stations / %hfclrs 3 /2S 3 / 29
Golden Cafe Sraflon~ / Vehicles 21 ! 3 4 / 22
,Marco Island Slations / VeMc]es I / ] 1 I / I?
Norlh .~'aples StatJon~ / YehJcles 4 / ! 7
F~=~t .%'s pies Scafions / VehJcles .3120 9; 43
l~le of Capri St'tions / Vehicles ! 14 1110
· l~merten.'c7 ~%~cdJctl ScrMces Ground / Air Ambulances · I ? / 1 * 5 ] / 2
Emergency MaAs ge'merle Shelter Spate (persons.) 29,700 persons .
SOlid %VanCe (Generation) Tons per Year 171,66S tons 413~03 tons
Solid '~Vastt (Land) Acres Consumed per Year 9 22
Parks
Commurtlty Num bet of Sites I Acres 141392 24 / 736
Re gJonal Number of Sifts I Acru 16 / 700 20 /
School Site (Joint Use) Number of ~ / Acres J0 / 50 24 / 600
LJbrat~ Facilities / Books ? / 246,00~ 26 / ?00,69S
Schoots
EJtmentm'y School Sites / Acr~ $ 8 / 30~ 36 /
.%Ud~He School Si~s /Acres 6 / 184 1 ! / 334
JUgh School Sites IAcr~ 4 / 177 7/357
Voc~tJon~1 School Sites / Acru ! 13S 2 /
Commmdty Cohere Enr~lLmen! / Acru S,300 / SO
L~w EAforcmnen(
CIf7 of Naples '.' FKflMes I Vehicles liS.3 1/60
Buildout Study Phase 1I - ' ·_ --
POPULATION
(Thousands)
~.-
"JAN 2 8 1997
'JAN :) 8 1997
Attachment 1
memorandum
Date:
To: Vince Cautero, Admimstrator
Community. Development & Environmental Services Division
F
rom~" Ma~or~e .X,L Student
Assistant Count' Attorney
Adjustment of.~lowable Densities in the Urban Area
PJ..S No. CMD96042601
You have asked in your memorandum dated April 24, 1996 what legal impediments the
County may have by lowering allowable densities in the urban area on property that is not
vested.
Specifically, the Bert .I. Harris, .Ir. Private Property Rights Protection Act would likely apply.
See Section 70.001, Florida Statutes attached. The Act provides:
When a specific action ora local goverrunental entity has inordinately burdened an
existing u~ of reaJ property..., the property owner of that real property is entitled to
relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of
the real property caused by the action ofthe government as provided in this section.
The term "action ora governmental entity" m~ans a specific action ora governmental entity
which affects the real property, excluding action on an application or permit. '
Additionally, the term "inordinate burden" is defined as follows:
That an ac'don of one or more governmental entities has directly restricted or limited
the use of real property such that the property owner is permanently unable to attain
the reasonable, investment - backed expectation for the existing use of the real
property.., with respect to the property as whole, or that the properly owner is left
with existing uses that are unreasonable such that the property owner bears
permanently a disproportionant share ora burden imposed for the good of the public,
which in ffirneas should be borne by the public at large.
Temporary impacts to land such as a building moratorium are not an inordinate burden.
No. ~
:JAN 2 8 1997
._. Pgo ~
August 20, 1996
Vincent A. Cautero
Adj. Allowable Densities Urban Area
RLS No. CMC96042601
Page 2
The term "existing use" means an actual present use or activity on the land, notwithstanding
periods or'inactivity normally associated with or incidental to the activity. An existing use
may also mean such reasonably foreseeable, non-speculative land uses which are suitable for
the subject real property, compatible wlth adjacent land uses and which have created an
existing lair market value in the property greater than the lair market value of the actual,
present use or activity on the real property.
So long as the existing requested use is not speculative, is suitable for the property, is
compatible with adjacent land uses, and can be justified by an appraisal the landowner should
come under the protection or'The Act.
Should property in the urban area that is already zoned for a residential use with a higher
density than that in a proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) having
the effect ofredudng density, the Property Rights Act could be triggered. Where property is
still zoned agriculture, even though entitled to a residential zoning designation with a density
higher than the proposed density, there should be less o£a problem. It could be argued that
the right to a future use of the property at a higher density even though not presently zoned
that way could trigger The Act. However, this is less likely.
An evaluation of each parcel to be down2oned would be necessary in order to determine the
County's exposure pursuant to Section 70.001 et seq. Florida Statutes.
There may be other legal impediments as well. For example, any amendment to the GMP
reducing density requires a police power justification as well as the need for studies to justify
same. Mere whim of'the public is not sut'ficient. Issues ofcompatibUity with adjacent land
uses also arise. There could also be an argument that reduction in density consistent with
"large lot" zoning which has been held to be discriminatory and in violation of'equal
protection.
There also may be a problem in the delivery of'affordable housing. Section 163.3177(6)(0
Florida Statutes mandates that the County provide affordable housing.
Note, however, that each of these scenarios should be evaluated on a case by case basis.
If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
MMSIew
h:~J~ublic'mms~n',cmos'cautcro adjustmenls to a~sitles urt~n area
Attachment --
AGE~t~
JAN 8 1997 /
RELIEF FROM BURDENS ON REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Ch. 7[
;s
tS
¢c) During lhe 180-day-notice period, unless
exiended by agreement of lhe parties, the governmental
enlity shall make a written seltlement offer 1o effectuate:
1. An adjustment of land development or permit
standards or other provisions controlling the develop-
ment or use of land.
2. Increases of modifications in the density, inten.
sity, or use of areas of development.
3. The transfer of developmental rights.
4. Land swaps of exchanges.
5. Mitigation, including payments in lieu of onsite
mitigation.
6. Location on the least sensitive portion of the
property.
7. Conditioning the amount of development or use
permitted.
8. A requirement that issues be addressed on a
more comprehensive basis lhan a single proposed use
or development.
9. Issuance of the development order, a variance,
special exception, or other exlraordinary relief.
10. Purchase of the real property, or an interest
therein, by an appropriate governmental entity.
11. No changes to the action of the governmental
entity.
If the property owner accepts the setllement offer, the
governmental entity may implement the settlement offer
by appropriate development agreement; by issuing a
variance, special exception, or olher extraordinary relief;
or by other appropriate method, subject to paragraph
(d).
(d)l. Whenever a governmental entity enters into a
settlement agreement under Ibis section which would
have t,'~e effect of a modification, variance, or a special
exception to the application of a rule, regulation, or ordi.
nance as it would otherwise apply to the subject real
properly, the relief granted shaft protect the public inter.
est served by the regulations at issue and be the appro.
priate relief necessary to prevent the governmental reg.
u[atory effort from inordinately burdening the real prop.
erty.
2. Whenever a governmental entity enters into a
settlement agreement under this section which would
have the effect of conlravening the application of a stat-
ute as it would otherwise apply to the subject real prop-
erty, the governmental entity and the property owner
shall jointly file an action in the circuit court where the
real property is located for approval of the settlement
agreement by the court to ensure that the relief granted
protects the public interest served by the statute at
issue and is the appropriate relief necessary to prevent
the governmental regulatory effort from inordinately bur-
dening Ihe real property.
(SXa) During the 180-day-notice period, unless a
settlement offer is accepted by the property owner,
each of Ihe governmental entities provided notice pursu.
ant lo paragraph (4Xa) shall issue a written ripeness
decision identifying the allowable uses to which the sub-
ject property may be put. The failure of the governmen.
Iai entity Io issue a written ripeness decision during lhe
lBO-day-notice period shall be deemed to ripen the
prior action of the governmental entity, and shall operate
as a ripeness decision that has been rejected by lh~
property owner. The ripeness decision, as a mailer
law, conslitutes lhe last prerequisite Io judicial review,
and the matter shall be deemed ripe or final for lhe put-
poses of Ihe judicial proceeding created by this sec~j~
notwithstanding the availabilily of other administr~
remedies.
(b) If lhe property owner rejects the settlement offer
and the ripeness decision of the governmental entity or
enlilies, the property owner may file a claim for compen.
salton in the circuit court, a copy of which shall be
served contemporaneously on lhe head of each ot the
governmental entities lhal made a settlement offer and
a ripeness decision that was rejected by lhe property
owner. Aclions under lhis section shall be brought only
in lhe county where the real property is located.
(6Xa) The circuit court shall determine whether an
existing use of the real property or a vesled righl to a
specific use of the real property existed and. if so.
whether, considering the selllement offer and ripeness
decision, Ihe governmental entity or entities have ino(di.
nalely burdened lhe real property. If the actions of more
than one governmental entity, considering any seltle.
merit offers and ripeness decisions, are responsible fo(
Ihe action that imposed the inordinale burden on lhe
real property of the property owner, lhe court shall deter.
mine the percenlage of responsibility each such govern.
mental entity bears with respect lo the inordinate bur-
den. A governmental entity may take an interlocutory
appeal of the court's delerminalion that the action o! the
governmental entity has resulled in an inordinate bur-
den. An interlocutory appeal does nol automatically stay
the proceedings; however, the court may stay Ihe,Bl~,
ceedings during the pendency of the interlock,t
appeal. If lhe governmental entity does nol prevail
!nterlocutory appeal, the court shall award lo the prevail-
lng property owner the costs and a reasonable atlorney
fee incurred by the property owner in the interlocutory
appeal.
(b) Following its determinalion of lhe percentage ol
responsibility of each governmental entity, and following
the resolution of any interlocutory appeal, lhe court shall
impanel a jury to determine Ihe lotal amount of compen.
salton to lhe property owner for the loss in value due to
lhe inordinate burden lo the real properly. The award of
compensation shall be determined by calculating lhe
difference in the fair markel value of the real property.
as it existed at the time of the governmental action al
issue, as though the owner had lhe ability to attain Ihe
reasonable investment-backed expectation or was not
left with uses that are unreasonable, whichever the case
may be, and the fair market value of lhe real property,
as it existed at the time of the governmental action at
issue, as inordinately burdened, considering the settle.
merit offer together with the ripeness decision, of the
governmental enlily or entities. In determining the award
of compensation, consideralion may not be given Io
business damages relative to any development, activity.
or use that the action of the governmental entity or enli-
t!es, considering the settlement offer togelher with Ihe
r~peness decision has ~
The award of compen,.
award of prejudgment nterest irom--"-J'J~'-'~le the
.JAN 2 8 1997
· ' Ch. 70 RELIEF FROM BURDENS ON REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS F.S. 1.~9~
was presented to the governmental entity or entities as
provided in subsection (4).
(c)1. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the
property owner is entitled to recover reasonable costs
and attorney tees incurred by the property owner, from
the governmental entity or entities, according to their
proportionate share as determined by the court, from
the date of the filing of the circuit court action, if the
property owner prevails in the action and the court
determines that the settlement offer, including the ripe.
ness decision, ot the governmental entity or entities did
not constitute a bona fide offer to the property owner
which reasonably would have resolved the claim, based
upon the knowledge available to the governmental
entity or entities and the property owner during the 180--
day-notice period.
2. m any action filed pursuant to this section, the
governmental entity or entities are entitled to recover
reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by the gov-
ernmental entity or entities from the date of the filing of
the circuit court action, if the governmental entity or anti.
ties prevail in the action and the court determines that
the property owner did not accept a bona fide settle.
merit offer, including the ripeness decision, which rea.
sonably would have resolved the claim fairly to the prop-
erty owner if the settlement offer had been accepted by
the property owner, based upon the knowledge avail.
able to the governmental entity or entities and the prop-
erty owner during the 180-day-notice period.
3. The determination of total reasonable costs and
attorney fees pursuant to this paragraph shall be made
by the court and not by the jury. Any proposed settle.
ment offer or any proposed ripeness decision, except for
the fine. I written settlement offer or the final written ripe-
ness decision, and any negotiations or rejections in
regard to the formulation either of the settlement offer
or the ripeness decision, are inadmissible in the subse-
quent proceeding established by this section except for
the purposes of the determination pursuant to this para-
graph.
(d) Within 15 days after the execution of any settle-
ment pursuant to this section, or the issuance of any
judgment pursuant to this section, the governmental
entity shall provide a copy of the settlement or judgment
to the Department of Legal Affairs.
(7)fa) The circuit court may enter any orders neces-
sary to effectuate the purposes of this section and to
make final determinations to effectuate relief available
under this section.
(b) An award or payment of compensation pursuant
to this section shall operate to grant to and vest in any
governmental entity by whom compensation is paid the
right, title, and interest in rights of use for which the com-
pensation has been paid, which rights may become
transferable development rights to be held, sold, ~ oth-
er,vise disposed of by the governmental entity. When
there is an award of compensation, the court shall deter.
mine the form and the recipient of the right, title, and
interest, as well as the terms of their acquisition.
(8) This section does not supplant methods agreed
to by the parties and lawfully available for arbitration,
mediation, or other forms of alternative dispute resolu-
tion, and governmental entities are encouraged to utilize
such methods Io augment or facilitate the processes
and actions contemplated by this section.
(9) This section provides a cause of action for gov.
ernmental actions that may pot rise to the level of a tak.
lng under the State Constitution or the United States
Constitution. This section may not necessarily be con.
strued under Ihe case law regarding takings if the gov.
ernmental action does not rise to the level of a taking.
The provisions of Ihis section are cumulative, and do not
abrogate any other remedy lawful'fy available, including
any remedy lawfully available for governmental actions
that rise to the level of a taking. However, a governmen.
lal entity shall not be liable for compensation for an
action of a governmental entity applicable to, or for the
loss in value to, a subject real property more than once.
(10) This section does not apply lo any actions taken
by a governmental entity which relate to the operation,
maintenance, or expansion ol transportation facilities,
and this section does not affect existing law regarding
eminent domain relating to transportation.
(11) A cause of action may not be commenced under
this section if the claim is presented more than 1 year
after a law or regulation is first applied by the govern.
mental entity to the property at issue. If an owner seeks
relief from the governmental action through lawfully
available administrative or judicial proceedings, lhe time
for bringing an action under this section is tolled until the
conclusion of such proceedings.
(12) No cause of action exists under this section as
to the application of any law enacted on or before May
11, 1995, or as to the application of any rule, regulatioa,
or ordinance adopted, or formally noticed for adoption.
on or before that date. A subsequent amendment to any
such law, rule, regulation, or ordinance gives rise Io a
cause of action under this section only to the extent thai
the application of the amendatory language imposes an
inordinate burden apart from the law. rule, regulation, o~
ordinance being amended.
(13) This section does not affect the sovereign immu-
nity of government.
1'0.51 Land use and environmentat dispute resotu-
tion.--
(1) This section may be cited as the 'Florida Land
Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act.' (2) As used in this section, the term:
(a) 'Development order" means any order, or notice
of proposed state or regional governmental agency
action, which is or will have the effect of granting, deny-
ing, or granting with conditions an application for a
development permit, and includes the rezoning of a spe-
cific parcel. Actions by the state or a local government
on comprehensive plan amendments are not develop-
ment orders.
(b) 'Development .permit' means any building per-
mit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, certification.
special exception, variance, or any other similar action
o! local government, as well as any permit authorized to
be issued under state law b
government which has the
development of real propert~
to, programs implementing cl
187, 258, 372, 373, 378, 380,
566
the
includ?~'r~(~.~ited
apt e r~s.l,~5.,. 1~61,- _1~_, 16~.
and~l~a'~ ,~ [J 1997
Pg, ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
INDIAN WELLS GOLF VILLAS
OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District, to accept the
newly-constructed water and sewer facilities to serve Indian Wells
Golf Villas and authorize the recordation of the appropriate legal
documents.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The developer of Indian Wells Golf Villas has constructed the
water and sewer facilities within dedicated utility easements to
serve this development. See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County
to accept the water and sewer facilities in accordance with County
Ordinances 78-10 and 79-33.
3) The water and sewer facilities will be, upon acceptance by
the Board, operated and maintained by the County Utilities
Division under a one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished ky
the developer. - o
4) The on-site inspection of the sewer facilities and water
facilities has been conducted by the County Engineering Inspection
section with the finding that the water and sewer facilities have
been constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and
Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) Surety for utilities
Improvement acceptance.
is covered under the Subdivision
FISCAL IMPACT: The water and sewer facilities were constructed
without cost to the County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water and sewer facilities are under a Contractual
Guarantee. After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining
the water facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
AGEN D,A. ,I.T£M .~
,JAN 2 8 1997
Executive Summary
Indian Wells Golf Villas
Page Two
GROWTH MANAGE~4ENT IMPACT: The sewer facilities will be connected
to the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and the
water facilities to the County Regional Water Treatment Plans.
This project will not create a new impact, as it has been planned
for within facilities available at present
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District,
accept the water and sewer facilities for Indian Wells Golf
Villas, with the following stipulations:
The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be
placed into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be
issued until the following items have been furnished:
1) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of these systems into service,
and;
2) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements,
and;
3) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire
hydrant for ownership and maintenance
4) Receipt of payment
bacteriological testing
for water usage from Utilities for
PREPkRED BY:
Shirley Nix, Engineering Technician Ii
Date
REVIEWED BY:
Engineering Review Services Manager
'JAN g 8 1997
Pg. ~
Executive Summary
Indian Wells Golf Villas
Page Three
Donald W. Arnold, AICP
Planning Service Depa~.tment Director
Vincent A. Cautero, AdminiStrator
COM/4UNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTA SERVICES
attachments
Date
Date
'JAN 2, 8 1997
OHS' THAT ARE NOT RECORDED
LIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY.
RATTLESNAKE HAJ'I'iOCK ROAD
LELY HICH
BLYD.
LDFLOWER WAY
GRAND LELY DR1'
LELY ISLAND
LELY RESORT BL
TRIANCLE BL
LOCAT I ON MAP
SABLE PAIL. Il RO~
'JAN 2 81997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER TO WORK
AGNOLI, BARBER AND BRUNDAGE,
MAINTENANCE DREDGING.
ORDER #ABB-FT-96-7 WITH
INC. FOR CLAM PASS
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval ora Change Order to Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 for
services related to Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging in 1997.
CONSIDERATIQN$:. Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 was entered into with Agnoli,
Barber and Brundage, Inc. to perform professional engineering services relative to
monitoring the performance of Clam Pass during FY 96/97. Based upon the results of this
monitoring, it is recommended that maintenance dredging of Clam Pass be performed
prior to May 1, 1997. As such, it is necessary to obtain additional services relative to
preparation of plans and specifications for bidding and construction, construction
observation, and post-construction surveys and final certification. Therefore, approval of
a Change Order as follows is requested to obtain these additional services:
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
AMOUNT
I. Prepare Construction Plans and Specifications
2. Bidding and Pre-Construction Services
3. Construction Observations
4. Post-Construction Surveys and Certification
5. Monitoring Survey (July 1997)
Total
$7,100.00
6,070.00
4,500.00
3,495.00
:5,170.00
$26,335.00
A summary of the status ofthis Work Order as a result of this Change Order is as follows:
Original Work Order Amount
Sum of Previous Changes
This Change Order (Add)
Present Agreement Amount
$8,590.00
0.00
26,335.00
34,925.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost:
Fund:
Cost Center:
Project Number:
$26,335.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
(I 95) Tourist Development (60%)
(110406) Beach Rer, ourishment, Category A
(80222) Clam Pass Inlet Management
Approval of a budget amendment will be necessary whereby funds
will be transferred from the reserves of Fund 195 to Account No.
195-110406-631400-80222 to provide sufficient funds for this
obligation.
,. :.'I 2 8 1537
Executive Summary
Page 2
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
Approve a Change Order to Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 with Agnoli, Barber and
Bmndage, Inc. to provide additional services related to maintenance dredging of' Clam
Pass.
2. Approve the necessary budget amendment for this obligation.
3. Authorize the OCPM Director to execute the Change Order.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Harry E. Huber, Project Manager III
Office of Capital Projects Management
Adolf'o A....C~..ez, l~., Director
Office of Capital Projects Management
Raym~dd W. Miller, P.E.~ Interim Administrator
Public Works Division
Date:/. 2z.9 7
cc: Agnoli, Baxber and Bmndage, Inc.
Beach RenourishmenffMaintenance Committee
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AMEND TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL GUIDELINES FOR
CATEGORY C GRANTS
OBJECTIVE: To amend Tourist Development Council guidelines for Category C
grants
CONSIDERATION: At the direction &the Board of County Commissioners the
Tourist Development Council established a subcommittee to review current Category C
guidelines. The subcommittee met twice and fowarded their recommendation to the full
Tourist Council. The Council met .l'anuary 20, 1997 and voted to recommend the
following
Change "a verifiable audit" to "accounting which may be verified by County Internal
Audit Departmenf'. Change the time for reporting financial information from 60 to
90 days. And add that the grantee must make a presentation to the TDC reporting the
results &the event at its first meeting following the 90 days after the event.
· Change the number of submission times for Category C applications from four to txvo
annually.
· Category C events must be held in the shoulder and off-season as opposed the event
demonstrating the potential for attracting offseason visitors
· Eliminate the provision for cash match and reimbursements ifthe Board approves
only funding promotion and advertising.
· Include that funding of Category C grants would only be for advertising and
promoting an event.
· Salaries &personnel would only be paid ifspeeified in the grant application.
· Add a provision which would exclude funding of special events which are exclusively
local in nature.
Attached are all the recommended changes. Many of the recommendations clarify
existing Ianguage and eliminate some redundancies.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IIVIPACT: None
JAN 2 1997
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the guidelines for Category C Tourist Development
grants as recommended by the Tourist Development Council and return with a resolution
readopting all of the guidelines incorporating these changes.
Prepared by.
Reviewed by:
Reviewed by:.,
J~...n Gansel, Budget Analyst
Michael Smykowski, OMB Director
geidi Ashto-n, Assistant County Attorney
/ .
Date: ,/~ 9'
Date:
Date:._~ ~[ ~ ~
Mission Statement
The purpose of the Tourisl Development Coundl is to advise the Collier County Board of Commissioners
with respect to the ~-penditure ofToutts~ Developmen! L~x revenue. Thc goal of Tourisl Tax expenditures
is to promole tourism in Collier County ss'ia an emphasis on the shoulder and off season of May through
November.
Background and History
The Touris~ Development Tax was approved by Collier County voters in November, 1992 under chapter
125 of the Florida Statutes. The tax adds two (2%) percent !o the bill paid by tourists for overnight
accommodations at hotels, motels, apartment hotels, rooming houses, RV parks, and condominiums in
Collier County. Visitors who rent acoommodafions in Collier County for six(6) months or less, pay thc tax.
TLc Ordinance approving the tourist tax was amended effective January 1,1996 to increase thc mx to throe
(3) percent. The additional one(1) percent is dedieated and will be used to repay funds borrowed for
beach rcnourishmenL
Thc third percent will be criminated when borrowed funds are repaid.
Allocation of Revenues
Category A: Beach Rcnourishmcnt and Pass Maintenance
Sixty (60%) percent of tourist tax monies raised under the two (2%) tax are alloca{cd under Ordinance No.
92-60 to f'mance beach improvement, maintenance renourishment, restoration and erosion control.
including pass and inlet maintenance.
One hundred (100%) percent of the additional (l%)onc percent is allocated completely to Catego~' A for
the purpose of repaying borrowed funds for the Beach Renourishment projecL
C:~: Advertising and Promotion
Twenty-five (25%) percent of tourist tax revenues raised undcr the two (2%) percent tax are alloeatcd
under ordinance No. 92-60 to advertising and direct marketing to attract Iourists from outside of collier
Count)' during the "shoulder and off season" of Ma)' tlu'ough November. Recomme. datlon: Change
Category 13 to BI
Cateoorv C: Local Projects and/or Activities which Promote Tourism
Fiflcc~erccnt of tourist lax revenues raised under the two (2%) percent tax arc allocated under
Ordinance No. 92-60 to local projects and/or aetivities which promote tourism with an emphasis on the
'shoulder and off season' of May through November. Change Category C to BZ Delete Fi. lteen (15%)
percent. ,adder least eight (8%) but not more than fifleen (15~), Change Ordinance Ara. 92.60 to 96.$4
Add Category C ~[[useu,t '"
Not to exceed seven (7%) percent of tourist tax revenue raised under the t~,o (2%) percent tax are a/lowed
for the net operating costs of the museum.
Funding for Economic Disaster:.
Five (5%) percent of Categories B and C are placed in a separate fund and reserved for advertising for
cconomic disaster. The purpose of the funding is to provide immediate information through the media
rcg,'u'ding the condition of Collier County should an economic disaster occur.
AGENDA ITEM
No. ? s'
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg.._
General Disbursement Guidelines
All Tourist Dcvclopmcnt Revenue allocation for Categories B and C. funding, sh.~11 be n~dc by awards of
grants to organLzation meeting all g~cral disburscmmt guidelines dcscribed below. Each organization
must also meet thc supplement disburserncnt guid¢llncs and eligibility rcquircments for thc spccific
category of funding applied for. RecommendaEon: Chan~e B and C !o ~I and B2
Grant Rcquircmcnts
Funds allocated for thc proposed activity or project may be expended only on those budgct linc items
spccificd for each such cxpenditpre in thc contract and in thc case of cach linc item, in an amount not
greater than specified for such expenditure in thc conl~aclj. Recommendation: Delete for each ruch
expenditure in the contract and In the case of each line Item. in an amount not greater than specified
for such expenditure in the contract.
2. Any ex'penditurc by d~c Grantco which is an unauthorized expenditure shall not be eligible for
rcimburscmcnL
3. All matcrials submitted with thc application will be held for consideration of the grant request and
cannot be returned.
Grant funds will be disbursed only after the contract has been signed by all parties and only after the
Grantee is in compliance with Collier County accounting procedure.
There will be no contract extensions for any non-expended grant funds existing at the end of thc
contract period unless othen%,ise approved by thc County in advance and duc to unforeseen
circumstances.
It is cxt.rcmelv important that any changes in thc project/activity, such as project dales,{ } key
participants, and budget revisions, be submitted l'cst to thc TDC for consideration, approval. ,'md
conlx'act amendment (if applicable). This shall be done in a limely manner. All proposed contracts
and contract amendments muss be approve4 by the TDC and tb~ County. Recommendation: Delete It
is extremely important that. Change any to Any. Add§ contract amen&nents Change be to shall be.
approval to recommendation, Delete contract amendments, Change must be approved to must be
reviewed, and the to and approved by
A grant recipient is required to maintain complete and accurate accounting and project
or activity records and keep grant funds in a separate checking account. A complete and verifiable
audil is required on each grant by thc recipient and is duc Io thc Administrator within sixty (60) days
at the completion of thc grant,. Recommendation: De/eta and verifiable audit is. Add accounting
which tnay be verified by County Interna/,ffudit Department, Change 60 to ~0, grant to et~ent or at a
date predetermined by the TDC and BCC. Add Grantee shall make a presentation to TDC the first
meeting following the ~0 days after the event to provide results of accounting and to an.orer
questions.. The TDC ma), change the PO day. e reporting time ba.r.e.d on the nature of the tn'enl.
All revenue related Io the project or activity should be recorded, and all expenditures must be
recorded, and all ex'pcnditures must be incurred within the contract period. Revenue for thc
proicct/acfivitY may be anticipated aI the time of application and may be utilized in meeting; the
applicant's match requirement for the oroiect or activity. Recommendation: Change should to shall.
Delete Revenue for the project/activity may be anticipated at the time of application and ma.v be
utilized in meeting the applicant's match requirement for the project or actit4ty.
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
pg.
Each grantee is requLred to submit annual fLqancial statemenls on the financial condition of the project,
or activity, or the grantee organization, and a special report on the receipts and expenditures of the
grant related projec~activity pursuant to the executed agreemenL Fa]lure to submit acceptable financial
or special reports in accordance with any contract will result Lq the cessation of reimburscrnents on all
grant contracts the grantee may have with the County at the dine, effective on the date the submissions
become overdue. Under such circumstances, no further reimbursements will be made for the duration
of contract periods and any rdmbursements already made shall be subject to later return to thc County
if acceptable statements and/or special reports required by those granl contracts are not submitled as
requLred or if reimbursements are later shown to not be properly matched.
10. Each grantee is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance naming Collier County, and its Board of
County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council as additionally insured. Thc certificate
must be valid for the period of the promotion, and be issued by a company licensed Lq thc State of
Florida, and provide General Liability insurance for no less than the foltowLqg amounts; or such other
amounts required by thc C.ounty's Risk Managcmcnt Departmenl:
· Bodily Injury Liability $300,000 each claim per person
°Property Damage Liability $300.000 each claim per person
*Personal Injury Liability S300,000 each claim per person
oWorkcr's Compensation and Employer' Liability - statutory
Applicatlnn and Revimv Process
I. TD C Administrator Thc Collier County Manager or his designee shall be the administrator of thc
Tourist Development Council
Applications and information for project funding should be obtained from:
Adminisu'ator/Direetor
Collier Count)' Tourist Devclopmcm Council
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples. Florida 3396
941-774-8717
Appllcqtions All applications must include a comprehensive ma.,'k~ing { }action plan which addresses
the mission statement of the Tourist Grant Program and a time line with particular emphasis on
generating room/nights in the of season. Fifteen (15) copies of the application must be submiued. Thc
Tourist Development Council will review applications for project funding at each quarterly meeting.
Quarterly meetings are scheduled for Februa~., May, August, and November, All applicalions must
be'submitted thirty (30) days prior to the next TDC meeting. Ail applications shall be used to
determine eligibility and priority of funding. The TDC Administrator will review the application for
cc, repleteness. Incomplete or insufficient applications will automatically be returned. Minor
irrcgul,'u'itics may be waived by the Tourist Development Council, and supplemental information may
be provided by the applicant prior to the meeting at which tho Tourist Development Council will
consider tho application. ,4ddf/ and detailed. Change February, May, ,~ugust. and ~Vovember to
Category B2 applications will be heard only at the 3~ay and ffovember meetings. Categoo, B I
applications will be heard at any scheduled meeting.
The TDC Administrator will submit the application lo thc'I'DC with an evaluation rclativc to thc selection
criteria. Thc County during its annual budget process will set an amount to be allocated toward projecl
funding. This amount will be based upon the Tourist Tax Revenues collected during thc prcvio~
fiscal .,,,ear. The TDC will hold hearings on applications on a quarterly basis. The TDC Admin
advertise thc schedule of quarterly TDC meetings on or about the beginning of September of ca
Thc TDC will then make its project funding recommendations known to thc Board of County
Commissioners.. The Bce will revi~v TDC recommendations and f'mally approve projects.
;trator ~3ItENDA ITEM
h :'eauo.__L
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg._ 5
3. Presentations. Thc Admln~s~tor or his dcsi~nc~ shall schedule ail qualified applications for
presentations before the Tourist Dcvelopmeat Council on the next appropriate meeting date. F. ach
qualified applicant may bc provided an opportunity to make a presmtation bcforo thc TDC or Board of
County Commissioners at thc discxction of the chairman or y thc acclamation of thc Tourist Dcvclopmcnt
Council or Board of Count)' Commissioners, respectively.
4. Public Record. All material submitled with the project funding application will bca maltcr of public
record, open to inspection by an)' citizen as provided in Chaplet 199, Laws of Florida.
Supplemental Disbursement Guidelines for Category C Local Projects/Activities Which Promote
Tourism
In addition to thc gmcral disbursement guidelines. Category C applicants must meet thc following
st pplcmcntal rcquircmenls:
1. Selection Criteria: Category C funding will bc awa'dcd Io those eligible applicants applying
for eligible projects which demonstrate the potenfia~ for attracting out of county, "._shoulder
and off season" ,.'isilo~ Recommendation: Delete "shoulder and off season" visitors. ,4dd
Tire event shall occur between 3gay to Arovember.
2. Award of Contract.: Aflcr approval by the Board of County Commissioncrs. selected
applicants shall enla' into conlracts with the County.
Special Conditions.
a. Eligible organizations awarded Category C funds aD'cc to prominently list Collier
Count)' Tourist Development Council as one of thc project sponsors on collalcml
materials and advertisements.
b. Eligible organizations awarded Calcgory C funds aD'cc to supply estimated figures in thc
narrative report for thc following:
· numbcrofparticipants
· out of count)' participants
· room nights generated by thc event
c. Reimbursement of Grants. In the event that revenues of a special event or project
received by the Grantee exceed thc actual costs incurred by thc Grantee in staging tile
special event or project, then, file amounts clig~Ic for grant reimbursement shall bc
dcc~cascci by the excess revenues up to thc full amount of the grant. Recomme. d~n'o.:
Add Delete/tent C if/he Board approves use offund.~ for only advertising
promotion.
d. An,.' ro'ectr ue lin ovcrF'iveHundrcdThou dDoll,-u's S500000. of Touris~
Development rcvcnu¢ rc_..quires a recommmdation of six out of thc nine members of thc
Tourist Development Council. Recommendation: Delete item d.
c. For-profit corporations arc roquirod to provide a 50% match in cash of thc requested
TDC funds. { } Not-for-profit organizations arc not required to provide ma~ching funds.
Recommendation: Change item e. to ti. AddO ^~o ca.~h match .'ill be required ifTDC
funds are used for advertising and promofion.
lncligihlc Expcnditurm and Organizations
Thc fo~diturcs and ~ons arc in¢lie:iblc for I'undin.[ with Tourist Dcvclo_gmcnt
revenues. Ch ange to Category C funds shall only be used to advertise and promote the event.
Incligiblc Expenditures I. Armual operating cx'pcnditures not directly rclaled to thc activity or projccl.
2. Salarics of full-time staff'.. Employment of personnel not dh'ectly rclated to thc actMty or
project { }. Recomme, daEon: Delete Salaries offull-tlme staff. ,4dd0 and not specked in
grant application
Real propcrty Dt, lete
Capital improvcmcnL including but not limited to new construction, renovation.
and installation or replacement of fixtures. Change number ~ ta$
AGENDA ITEM
stor31~.
JAN 2 8 1997
$. ~pcrson~l propen'y, ~ncludlngbul no! I~il~ ~o o~ce f~hings or ~u~pmen~
p~t ~o~ or indMd~ pi~ of m. Recom~ndat~n: Add Purchase of
Change Tangible to tangible, nu~ ~ to 4
6. Inl~e~, or r~u~ioa ofdefici~ or Io~. E~ in~M or obligalM prior Io or ~ler
proj~ fund~g p~od. Change nu~er 6to 5
7. Pdza money, ~chol~hlps, aw~, pl~u~, or ~fi~l~. Change number 7 to 6
8. Travel ~d p~ diem ~enses P01 ~0~at~ direly with proic~, Per diem ex3~s~ for ~
cyst in cxccs$ of fl~e amounts au~ofiz~ in $c~ion 11Z06 !, Florida Slniute~. Change to
Trm,el not directly associated with project. Change nu~er ~ to 7
9. Proje~s which ~c r~M Io pflvat~ or cxcl~ive p~icipaflon cxc~t for invitational ~'cn~
which r~ube a pr~;flon ofp~clp~ ~u~ pmv~ ability to gcn~tc hotcl room
nigh~ duHng ~c Naples' ~u should~ ~on. C~ange nu~er 9 t, ~
10. Pdvatc cntcm~m~k food or b~e~g~ ~c~t for ~$4mfion~ o'm~ which r~ulrc a
pr~u~o~on ofpmic~ ~u~ p~vcn ability to gcn~tc hotel room nigh~ during
fl~c Naplcs' ~ should~ s~on. Change number I0 to ~
I i. M~ing pa)'m~ or rcimbu~ts for goods or sc~ic~ purch~ for prcvious or ofl~cr
o'~ts. Changenumb~ I1 to I0
Add II.
Events which are exclusively local in nature such as a parade.
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg. /7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REQUEST DIRECTION TO AMEND CATEGORY A TOURIST
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES TO INCLUDE OTHER INLET AND INLAND
WATERWAYS NOT CURRENTLY SPECIFIED
O~3JECTIVE: To request direction to amend Category A Tourist Development
guidelines to include other inlet and inland waterways.
CONSIDERATION: The current Category A Tourist Development guidelines specify
work relative to Doctors, Wiggins, and Clam Passes only. Category A applications
request funding for additional areas. The Beach Renourishment Committee has
suggested the guidelines be clarified to reflect the other inlets and inland waterways that
are now covered by inlet management plans and other reasonable projects, such as the
Marco Beach Management Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOM},IENDATION: Board direct the Beach Committee and the Tourist
Development Council to review the Category A guidelines and report recommendations
to the Board.
Prepared bY:~st Date:/~~
Reviewed by:. Date:
Michael Smykowski, OMB Director
Reviewed by:~~l$~~L Date: %_.L~~ q
Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg._ I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO APPROVE FUNDING CAXAMBAS PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING
5380,600, T-GROIN CONSTRUCTION IN CAPRI/BIG MARCO PASS S363,200,
AND CLAM PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING $13,830. CATEGORY A
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
OBJECTIVE: To approve funding Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging $380,000, T-
Groin Construction in Capri/Big Marco Pass $363,200, and Clam Pass Maintenance
Dredging $13,830 Category A Tourist Development funds.
CONSIDERATIONS: The City/County Beach Renourishment Committee reviewed the
attached applications and recommended approval with the condition that the Board
consider clarifying the guidelines as presented in Executive Summary item 8E2. At the
January 20, 1997 meeting the Tourist Development Council unanimously recommended
approval of the three grant applications.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are available in Fund 195, Tourist Development
Category A reserves. A budget amendment is required.
GROWTH MANAGEiS, LENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: Approve funding three grant applicants totaling $757,630
Tourist Development funds Category A and budget amendment.
t//Jean Gahsel, Budget Analyst / ,/
Reviewed by:. Date:
Michael Smykowski, OMB Director
Reviewed by:~~~~~;~Date: / ~.__~..~.~ '-~
Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney
AGENDA ITEM
No.~
JAN 2 8 1997
Exhibit A
Collier County Tourist Development Council
GRANT APPLICATION
Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance
(Beach improvement, maintenance
renourishment, restoration and erosion
control, including pass and inlet
maintenance)
Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address:
Administrator
Collier County Touri~;t Development Council
County Manager's Office
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 33962
1. Name
and Address of Applicant Organization:
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number:
Harry Huber
Project Manager III
774-8192
3. Organization's Chief Official and Title:
Commissioner ~'ohn C, Norris
Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
4. Brief Project Description:
Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging
--^GENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
~,g., ox` ,.,
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 2
6.
7.
8.
Estimated project start date: February. 1997
Estimated project duration: 6 months
Total amount requested: $980,600
If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the
program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award?
Yes No
9. Identify the goals and objectives for the project:
The goals of' the Caxambas Pass Inlet Mana_~ement Plan
are to: (1~) backpass small o_uantitles of' sand to offset
the updrift beach erosion: ¢23 protect and enhance the
natural resources of the ~yHem and: (3) provide a
permanent marked navigation channel with adequate
water depth, The objective of this project is tO
implement these goals,
lO.
Describe what benefits will be received from the project:
The project will im_orove the navigability of eaxambas
Pass and restore Marco Island's shoreline,
11. ·
12.
Describe how the effectiveness of' the project will be evaluated:
Monitoring of' project performance will enable the effect-
iveness of the project to be evaluated as well as provide
an indi~;ation when futur~ improvements will ~¢
necessary,
Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist
Development Programs:
This project provides improvements recommended in the
Caxambas Pass Inlet Mana_~ement Plan which is an
integral component of the County Tourist Development
program,
.lAN 2 8 1997~
ACENDA ITEM
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 3
13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored:
The r ' w'l mana ed hr u h the existing.
,nni i n
n will mini 'an r 'n
fi 't ' n mn e ai f
h r' n' f" ' r'n
a i d wi i ' r -
'e · 2 f n u ' ' n 'Mana e-
nt t T e al m n h r e ud et
i 380 600
14.
Plcase complete the following questions and provide additional
information, if necessary:
Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined
in the Mission Statement7
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to
different geographic areas of the County?
Yes ( X )
Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental
awareness and understanding and does the proposed project
address environmental considerations?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is the proposed project part of the ongoing Collier County
beach restoration project and/or pass maintenance/
dredging/management projects?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a
condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach
restoration projects?
Yes ( ) NO (X) ^GENDAITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 4
* Will the proposed project contribute signiHcantly to the
progress of the beach restoration projects?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
* Will the project decrease the local cost share of an overall
beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total
project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio7
Yes ( ) No ( X )
* Will the project improve understanding of alternative
technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach
restoration project?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
* Is there a potential for an alternative/matching funding source7
Yes ( ) No ( X )
If "Yes", please identify,
Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and/or standing Board of County
Commission action?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach
Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee?
Y Thi 1' i w n' ' h ach
n ri hm / ' n mi ir
u rl h I in n r 997 Th ir
m i '
AGENDA ITEM
JAN28199-
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 5
I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and
agreq~that my organizatign will comply with all guidelines and criteria.
Signat~ure Yr ?rga (~tati60 Chief Official or D,,ign,,
Date: ~
*Director of Offie~ of Capital Proj~eta Management authorized to ~ign
Category "A" appIieations on behalf of th~ Chairman ofth~ Board of
CountyCommi~sioner$. Approved by Board of County Commi~sionera on
Auguat 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2).
AGENDA ITEM
No.~ $ (3~
JAil 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 6
PROJECT BUDGET.
Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging
ACTIVITY
Engineering Services
Construction
Project Management Fees (OCPM)
AMOUNT
$ 34,200
$333,200
S 13,200
Total
S350,600
JAN28199- t~j
TYPICAL SECTION D-D'
°pw- ' ........... ~' ':'~-I°
-10
-lit -12
-10 I~ 200 300
DISTANCE
~R~CAL EXAGG[RA~ON = 20:1
OF
MEXICO
· .R145
PROPOSED
SEA CH
FILL
MARCO ISLAND
COMPOUND
,,, ~r:~o ,~ ,, ... ':' .... '" ' "
,'.";~ '"--.. ,' ', ; ', ........
,' ,' .:... / /, ', I '.. ..-.': .... ::-..,,,,d.H/ti?.~ .......
! : ' %', , -' .- ~ / ' .' ~,,~l,l'tllll'~"'
; , ,, ,' , -- ·
· ../ , -..,_ _,_. ...... -,.~,. ...... ,/ -
,--, ,-~.-, ,- ,. :, ,,,
· '- ",'-- "' - ~ ~ -"-'
· '.., ,,~: , ,~ .,~¢I.LI-I'LLI.~;"-': .... . ..... ....
',, t, / ' : ,. :" ~ ; ~'-:_'-_'-Z-::,.",.
, ,, .....
.... ...~~,y ~ ,~; ./.:..;/ - _. ,
~ ,... ... / .oo...-.r...-..., ..
·... , , .zrl~t~'P,~~.'.,,::?; ,
,. , . . -.. . ..... · . --.*.?.~v'~~_-- ".;-'.-,~NT..~ ! ."_,, .. ·
.. · -. ..... . r ~_** ~..?~ '.'- ..'_.::-%./ ,
.... -'.?..~;,=-'=,=..=_--.-'.~'.:-' .-~-_'*; .... '., .... BORRO _, ...;..- .,
I /, .-'-' ~ , /' \...:F .... o,;' ,/ ,£ .,
· ....ti '~ ' ...-° .... '~._.o~ ~'° .oo--'°
.- °.°.o- ..o-. ...... o o&. .... .," ,
.. ~ ='*- AGENDA ITEM
: " ' l' No._~_.t__C.~J.
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
DREDGF NATURAL. SCOUR CHANNEL- '3'~K ~l 1997
Coll.:i.e,' County Tourist, De ~e[ol:i~.nt- .~ounc~.
G~ant, App!~.cataion ,
Page 7
Exhibit A
Collier County Tourist Development Council
GRANT APPLICATION
Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance
(Beach improvement, maintenance
renourishment, restoration and erosion
control, including pass and inlet
maintenance)
Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address:
Administrator
Collier County Tourist Development Council
County Manager's Office
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 33962
1. Name and Address of Applicant Organization:
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail Ea~
Naples. Florida 34112
2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number:
Harry Huber
Pro|eot M~nagcr III
774-$192
3. Organization's Chief Official and Title:
Commissioner John C. Norris
Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
4. Brief Project Description:
T-(~roin ¢on$1[ruction in Capri/Big Marco Pass
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 199;
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 2
5.
6.
7.
8.
Estimated project start date: February, 1997
Estimated project duration: 6 months
Total amount requested: $363,200
If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the
program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award?
Yes No X
Identify the goals and objectives for t'~e project:
The objective of this proiect is to provide the services .
necessary for the design and construction of T-Groins
composed of sand filled geo-textile bags along Hideaway
Beach tO provide immediate protection from inlet impacts and
storm protection of endangered upland Structures, The ..
proposed project is a recommended alternative as
identified in the Big Marco Pass and Capri Pass Inlet
Management Plan,
10.
Describe what benefits will be received from the project:
The proPoSed project is intended tO reduce the erosion
along Hideaway Beach and t0 accumulate sand tO
replenish the eroded shoreline, This will preserve the
recreational benefits 0f the beach as well as marine turtle
nesting habitat, Additionally, it will reduce the need for.,
periodic nourishment, which is not cost effective,
11.
Describe how the effectiveness of the project will be evaluated:
Post-Construction monitoring in accordance with permit
conditions will provide a basis for evaluating the project
performance and confirm the installation as a long-term
solution tO th, erosional im_~aets.
12.
Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist
Development Programs:
This project provides improvements recommended in the
Capri/Big Marco pall Inlet Management Plan which i~ an
AGENDA ITE~V
JAN 2 8 199;
pg.
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 3
'ne ralc m hen f h n uri Devel ment
13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored'
h r' d e w'll n hr h th xi in
fin n iai nd rn na m n r 1' r n
and will be dm'mi ered r' mana r in he
file f aial r' t na m n Th a i f h
~ n itsof' 1 fen in erin ~
Services assoc____jated with the e i hand construction f
h ' t' 2 n ' ' r'e
fana ern nt · d 4 i Ii i nfee.~
The t I i 363 200 00
14.
Please complete the following questions and provide additional
information, if necessary:
Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined
in the Mission Statement?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to
different geographic areas of the County?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental
awareness and understanding and does the proposed project
address environmental considerations?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is the proposed project part of the ongoing Collier County
beach restoration project and/or pass maintenance/
dredging/management projects?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
AGE~DA ITE~
No._ ~._ ~.~~
JAN 2 8 1~
Collier County Tourist Development Council
· Grant Application
Page 4
* Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a
condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach
restoration projects?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the
progress of the beach restoration projects?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Will the project decrease the local cost share of an overall
beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total
project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
Will the project improve understanding of alternative
technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach
restoration project?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is there a potential for an alternative/matching funding source?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
If "Yes", please identify.
Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and/or standing Board of County
Commission action?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach
Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee?
Yes. This application was considered by the Beach
Renourishment/Maintenance Committee at their
r~gularly scheduled meeting on lanuar_v 3. 1997.
Their recommendation is attached hereto.
JAN 2 8 199;
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page $
I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and
agre~t that my o~'ganizatlon will comply with all guidelines and criteria.
Signatu~ ~/f Organ, j~atroa~'s Chief Official or Designee*
Date: ~
*Director of Office of Capital Projects Management authorized to sign
Category "A" appllcations on behalf of' the Chairman of the Board of
County Commissioners. Approved by Board of County Commissioners on
August 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2).
H gH/jaa/1,1910
AGENDA IT. EM
JAN 28 1997
pg._ ~5
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 6
2.
3.
4.
Proiect Bud~tet
T-GKOIN CONSTI~UCTION IN CAPI~I/BIG MAP. CO PASS
Engineering Services
Construction
Project Management Fees (OCPM)
Permit Application Fees
Total
~,MOUNT
$28,500.00
$307,700.00
$12,500.00
$14.500.00
$363,200.00
AGENDA IT~EM
JAN 2 8 1997
pg.___l q
ISLAND
N1
SOUTH POINT
(APPROX.)
7' NGVD
--{ s,'E SHEET '1'--'
NOTES:
$.
2.
3.
4.
.~.
7.
Collier County Tourist Oeveiopment
Council
Grant ~pplication
Page
I
I
I
(APPROX.)
+1.$7' NGVO
~--~-~?-- ....~ SEE SHEET 3F--J
#1
MARCO ISLAND
EATHYtdL'TRY BASED ON HYDROGRAPHIC SURV£Y CONDUCTED BY
SEA SYSTEMS CORPORATION COidPL~'TED 11/94.
APPROXIMATE: MNW LOCAT1ON BASED ON SURVEY CONDUCTED BY
AGNOU, BARBER AND BRUNDACE COMPLETED 1/92.
ALL ELL'VATION$ AS SHOWN ARE RErER£NCI~D TO NATIONAL
C£O0£TIC V£RTICAL DATUM, I<J2g (NGVD).
E:CL rSTABUSHCD IN lggl FOR T14E: k~ARCO ISLAND BEACH
R£NOURISHIA£NT PROJECT.
T-GROIN POSITION AND CON?IGURATION SUBJ£CT TO REVISION
BASED UPON pENDING CURRENT MEASURfldENT$ AND FIN&L DESIGN.
SEE: SHE:bT 3 OF $ fOR ROYAL MARCO POINT DETAILS.
SEE SHE:ET 40Ir 5 FOR SOUTH POINT OETAIL~.
$E:£ $H£~ $ oF 5 fOR T-GROIN DETAILS.
pE:RMIT ORAW~NO, NOT fOR CONSTRUCTION.
,ii
~.GENDA ITE_~
~,N 28 1~,
EXIIIBIT A
Collier County Tourist Development Council
GRANT APPLICATION
Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance
(Beach improvement, maintenance
renourishment, restoration and erosion
control, including pass and inlet
maintenance)
Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address'
Administrator
Collier County Tourist Development Council
County Manager's Office
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 33962
1. Name
and Address of Applicant Organization:
flier n B r n mini i n rs
3301 ami iT all
Na~
2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number:
Ha rr HLY__.~_b_~
Pr 'eot an
774-81 92
3. Organization's Chief Official and Title:
~ mini i n hn rri
~ ard un mini 'n
4. Brief Project Description:
lam Pa M iht n n Dre in
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 2
6.
7.
8.
Estimated project start date:
Estimated project duration: ~~
Total amount requested: 3 830 00 ~
If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the
program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award?
Yes No X
9. Identify the goals and objectives for the project:
The 'e tiv f hi r ' ' rf rmthen ar
un ti n i w' inin I n - rm rmit
main ain fl w h u ' i h r c f
dev I in th 'hi m a I ~
10.
Describe what benefits will be received from the project:
Acqui~,;iti0n of a tong term permit well provide the uninter-
rupted capability of maintaining..~;ufficient tidal exchange
for adequate fl~;hlng of the mangroves surrounding the
Clam Bay area,
I1.
Describe how the effectiveness of the project will be evaluated:
Monitoring of project performance will enable the
effectivenes,,; of the project tO be evaluated as well as
provide pertinent information necessary for development
of the Clam Pa~s Inlet Management plan,
12.
Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist
Development Programs:
This project will provide the criteria necessary to complete
the Clam Pass Inlet Managem,nt plan which is an
integral component of the County Tourist Dcvelopmcnl
program,
AGENDA ITEM
No._¢
JAN 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 3
13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored:
The project budget will be managed (;hr0ugh the existing
financial and management structure of Collier County
and will be adminis(;ered by a project manager in the
Office of Capital Projects Management, The basis of
the project budge(; consists of: ('1) Cost of _~rofessional
1;ervices associated with the performance Of permit
monitoring requiremen(;S: (2) Permit Application Fees
and: ('3) Pro!ect Management Fees. The total amount
Of (;he proposed budget is $13.$30.00,
14.
Please complete the following questions and provide additional
information, if necessary:
Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined
in the Mission Statement?
Yes (X) No ( )
Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to
different geographic areas of the County7
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental
awareness and understanding and does the proposed project
address environmental considerations?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is the proposed project i',a~t of the ongoing Collier County
beach restoration projec~ and/or pass maintenance/
dredging/management projects?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a
condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach
restoration projects.'?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
AGENOA ITl[
,o.._,S.J.J
JAN 2 8 19
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 4
Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the
progress of' the beach restoration projects?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
Will the project decrease the local cost share of' an overall
beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total
project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
Will the project improve understanding of' alternative
technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach
restoration project?
Yes ( X ) No ( )
* Is there a potential f.or an alternative/matching funding source?
Yes ( ) No ( X )
If "Yes", please identify.
Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and/or standing Board of County
Commission action7
Yes ( X ) No ( )
Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach
Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee?
Ye Thi lic i wa n i r theB ach
Ren uti hm n/ ' n i h ir
ularl h I ' 997
Th irr ~ r ~
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 5
I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and
will comply with all guidelines and criteria.
Signaturet/of Orga ~ti.oln's Chief Official or Designee*
Date: /~.//~/qo, _
*Director of Office of Capital Projects Management authorized to sign
Category "A" applications on behalf' of' the Chairman of' the Board of
County Commissioners. Approved by Board of County Commissioners on
August 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2).
Grant Application 14912
AGE. f,JDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Application
Page 6
Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging
Monitoring Services
Permit Application Fee
Project Management Fees
TOTAL
$8,590.00
$2,600.00
$13,830.00
JAN 2 8~
NORTH D;SPOSAL AREA: ~1
pREVIOUSLY uSED IN THE 1995 / I
DREDGING. AUTHOriZED UNOER /
OEP JCP pERMiT 11285g059.~
10o ~T SOUTH OF OEP
~ONU~ENT R-41 AND EAT[NO
TO APPROXlUATELY 600 ~T
NORTH Or R-~7.
~y Tourist Development C-~
Grant Application
::.:.:.:.:,:,,,..,...,.,,
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:.:.:,:.:
~..:':::.......,
::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::
FOR INLET 0ETAIL
--J SE£ SHEET 7 OF 7 FOR
TYPICAL DISPOSAL DETAIL
sEE SHEET 2 or
SOUTH DISPOS.~L AREA:
pRCvIO~LY USED IN THE 1996
DREDGING. AUTHORIZED UNDER
OEP ~P pERmiT 1128~g05g.
AND IN 1995 UN0[R 0[P
JCP PERMIT 112659015.
COMU[NC[ APPROXIMATELY
400 FEET NORTH OF
MONUMENT R-42 ANO [XT[NO
TO APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET
SOUTH.
APPLICANT: COLLIER COUNTY OFFICE OF
CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT
~OUTER wATER GOOY: GULF OF MEXICO
INNER WATER BODY: CLAM BAY via CLAM PASS
TYPE OF WORK: MAINTENANCE DREDGING or
FLUSHIHG OUTLET OF CLAM
'.-;-;-; .::;...
eD
rJ DENOTES DNR R[rERENCE MONUMENT
pERMIT ORA'WINOS. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO
AGE
)CATTY'-
CLAM PASS tdAINT[ lANCE OR£0C, IN.~.-
SITE P A~ Pg.. .... C:J.c _
--. -- . _~% o,,c: ,o;,/. ,,.x: s?u,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE 92-60 RELATING TO THE LEVY OF
2% TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX TO INCLUDE THE RECONSTRUCTION
OF A PUBLIC FISHING PIER
OBJECTIVE: To consider amending Ordinance 92-60 relating to the levy of 2% Tourist
Development Tax to include the reconstruction of a public fishing pier.
CONSIDERATION: The City of Naple~ submitted a grant application to the Tourist
Development Council for $450,000 for reconstruction of the outer half of the Naples Pier.
At the January 20, 1997 meeting the Tourist Development Council reviewed this
application. Currently local ordinance does not provide for funding this project however
public fishing piers is an authorized use of tourist tax revenues in Florida Statutes.
The Tourist Development Council voted unanimously to recommend the Board of
County Commissioners amend the local ordinance to include public fishing piers as
provided for in Florida Statutes. The vote included reducing the allocation for Category A
uses (Beach Maintenance).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in 001-013010 for advertising the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of County Commissioners consider amending
Ordinance 92-60 to include public fishing piers as an authorized use and direct staff
accordingly.
Prepared b y:~X-~'--"~. Date:~
t~/Jean Gansel, Budget Analyst
Reviewed by:_
Michael Smykowski, OMB Director
Reviewed by: ~~~~~d~~- .
Heidi Ashton, P~sistant County Attorney
Date:
AGENOA~IT.F.~M
Noo~
JAN 8 997
Pg.__/
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
7:15 STH STREET SOUTH, NAPLES, FL 34102
SI3-434-4655
FAX NO. t15.434-3059
TO: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County
FROM: Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee
THROUGH: Collier County Tourist Development Council
SUBJECT: Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Funding
Request Recommendation
The attached request for TDC Category A funding, submitted by th___~e
~les :
to be used for reconstruction of the outer half of the Naples
Pier
is recommended to be:
__Approved as submitted.
Approved with the following changes:
Deferred to: '
Disapproved.
Comments: the Beach Renourishment/Management Committee
acknowledged receipt of the fundin rg~est and voted to forward
it to the Tourist Development Council for consideration for
~ under Cate or~. The Committee also understands that
such work on a.~ublic fishing pier is allowed b~the Florida
Statutes
3CS/TDC~'OIV4.
Date 16 De
JAN 2 8 997
Pg o ~-
BILL BARNETI'
MAYOR
November 8, 1996
Mr. Richard E. Lydon
Chairman, Beach Renourishment Committee
450 Tradewinds Avenue
Naples, FL 34108
Dear Mr. Lydon:
The historic Naples Pier has been an important part of our community for more than
one hundred years. It was first built to serve as the major point of commerce for the young
community growing along Florida's gulf coast. In more recent years, it has served to provide
generations of residents and visitors with beautiful sunsets, fishing opportunities and a
unique perspective of our coastal community.
During 1995 and early 1996, the City of Naples and Collier County jointly funded the
rebuilding of the inward half of the Naples Pier, damaged by storms and years of exposure
to the elements. The elected officials chose to rebuild that section of the pier with a concrete
foundation and a wood superstructure to add permanence to the pier and yet to retain the
historical look and feel. The State of Florida Department of Parks & Recreation also
contributed $100,000 to this effort.
To complete the work begun in 1995, the City of Naples is requesting $450,000 in
Tourist Development Tax revenues to rebuild the outer half of the Fishing Pier to the same
standards as the work in place on the inward half. This will allow for this historical structure
to provide enjoyment to future generations of our residents and visitors to our community.
Sincerely,
Bill Barnett
Mayor
735 EIGHTH STREET SOUTH · NAPLES. FLORIDA .'t~I02.6796
TEL {941) 434-4601 FAX (941) 4M.483.~
VOICE MAIL 433.8345
AGENDA ITEM
....
JAN 2 S 1997
November 14, 1996
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAG[
Mr. Richard E. Lydon
Chairman, Beach Renourishment Committee
450 Tradewlnds Ave.
Naples, FL 34108
Dear Mr. Lydon:
The City of' Naples is pleased to submit appllcafion for Tourist Development funding to
complete the rebuilding of.the historic Naples Pier. As you are aware, the inner half of,the
structure was rebuilt in 1995-96, using concrete piling to provide belier storm resistance
for the structure. This project cost :;650,000 and was financed 50-50 by the City of'
Naples and Collier County, pbs $100,000 funding from a State of Florida grant.
The outer half' of the structure was seriously damaged by Tropical Storm Keith in 1988
~;nd was totally rebuilt. We have received FEMA funding to complete some necessary
repair work to that section. That work will be completed prior to the start of, hurricane
season 1997.
Suboceanic Consultants has estimated that the total costs to rebuilt the outer half, of' the
Naples Pier will be ~n the range of $450,000. To provide for the orderly financing of'that
project, we are requesting Beach Renoufishrnent funding of $150,000 annually for each of
the next three years. The Naples Pier has served as a dest~ation for thousands of visitors
to our community for many years. As the laxpayers of the City of Naples and Collier
County have paid for halfofthe project, it |s appropriate that Tourist Tax dollars be used
to complete the project. AS an aIternative funding source, the City has applied for FEMA
~tigation funding for this project. That reques~ is pending.
We look forward to your favorable consideration of our funding request.
z:bi]l~lI 1149~Toul~glax.&~g
Dr. Richard L. Woodruff//
City Manager ' *
AGENDA ~M
J .N 2 8 1997
Pg..__//
FACSIMILE (941) 434.4620 TELEPHONE (941) 434-4610 SUNCOM 974-4610
735 EIGHTH STREET. SOUTH ,, NAPLES. FLORIDA 34102-6796
Collier County Tourist Developmen= Council
GRA~T APPLICATION
Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance
(Beach i~rovement, maintenance
renourishmen=, restoration and erosion
control, including pass and inlet
~aintenance)
Completed applications must be received ac =he below
address no 1acer than S:00 P.M. firsn Monday in Nove~oer
Administrator
Collier County Tourist Developmen= Council
County Manager's Office
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, F~ 33962
Name and address of Applicant Organi=atlon:
City of Naples
735 8th Sc. S.
Naples, Florida 34102
ConTac= Person, Title and Phone Number:
William P. Harrison, Assistant City Mana~
(941) 434-4610
Organization's Chief Official and Title:
Bill Barnett, Mayor
Brief Project Description:
Rebuild the outer half of the historic Naples
on the inner half of the ~ier.
AGENDAITEM
No. £~ .,/
JAN 2 8 Igg7
Collier County Tourian Developmen~ Coun¢£1
Grant Application
2
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
£s~imaced project start dace:
£s:ima:ed Project duration:
To=al amount requested:
Months
~Over three--ars
If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project
be restructured to accommodate a smaller award?
Yes No X
d~ '~, ooa v C '
The Naples Pier has been a landmark enid
b_ky_koth our citizens and visitors for over one hundred years.
Rebuildin~ w~}l'p_rovi~e for,the..continued/safe enjoyment of the facilities.
~at b n s w · v ~om h ~ 4cc :
Rebuildt~o the standards of the inner half will provide
hazard mitigation and s~reduce the chance of
service interruptions from storms.
~S e~ r ~ t wi be evaluated-
£ffectivenesa evaluated b com 1erin the project
at or below bu~ithin~cted construction
~and withh__.~.h!gh, construct~
escrfbe how t o nha ~ v our Der lo men
A well constructed and maintained Na les
Pier will continue to be a to tourist
s r'be h w' a c w be mon ~ r d-
e will be ub ect to all standard
~ment controls of the
AGENDA I~M
No.__f XL_
JAN 2 8 lg97
Pg._ /.
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Gramt Application
Page 3
14.
Please complete the followingquestions and provide additional
information if necessary.
Does the proposed expenditure further =he objectives outlined in
=he Mission Statement?
Yes C X) No C )
Does =he proposed expenditure fairly disnribu=e monies
different geographic areas of the County?
Yes ( ) No ¢ X)
Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness
and understanding and does a proposed projec= address
environmental considera=£ons?
Yes ¢ X) No C )
Is =he proposed project part of =he ongoing Collier beach
res=ora=ion project and/or pass maintenance/dredging/management
projects?
Yes ( ) No (X)
Is the proposed project required by a regula:ory agency as a
condition for approval/funding =he Collier County beach
res=oration projects?
Yes ( ) No (X)
Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the
progress of the beach restoration projects?
Yes ( ) No (X)
Will the project decrease ~he local cost share of an overall
beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total
project cost or by increasing the local/~on-local ratio?
Yes ( ) No C X)
will the project improve understanding of a!:ernative
technologies that may contribute to a cos:-effec=ive beach
res=oration project?
Yes { ) No (X) AGENDA ITEM
k'
JAN 2 8 1997
PP, ..... ~ .....
, ,-
Collier County Tourist Development Council
Grant Appl£cac£on
~age 4
Is there a potential for an alterna=ive/macch£ng funding source?
Yes eX) ~o ( )
. . - See attached letter
Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and/or standing Board of County Co~missioners
action?
Yes (X) No { }
Has the proJecC been reviewed ~J~d recommended b~ the Beach
Renourishmenc/Maintenance Advisoz~fComm/ctee?
Yes ( ) ~o (
I have read the Beach Renourishmen= and Pass Guidel~nes and criteria and agree
=ha= my ~~.1,/~ all guidelines and criteria.
~,%L~'nature
of_Organ~za=~on's Chief Official ~
AGENDA ITI~M
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
Cons:ruction
Design
$~10o000
$ 40,000
$410,000
$ 40,000
TOTAl.,
$450,000
AGENDA ITEM
No. .~x- z~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REVIEW OF 5 YEAR NON-CIE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
OBJECTIVE= BCC review of the Five Year non-CIE Capital Improvement
Plan, which is funded principally by General Fund ad valorem taxes.
In addition, policy direction from the Board is needed regarding
alternatives to balancing the plan.
CONSIDERATIONS~ On an annual basis, non-CIE capital project
requests exceed the available pool of General Fund ad valorem
taxes allocated to capital projects. In response, as part of the
adopted FY 97 budget policy, the Board of County Commissioners
directed staff to develop a Five Year non-CIE Capital Improvement
Plan for projects funded by a transfer of General Fund ad valorem
taxes.
Staff has compiled a list of requested capital projects for the
period from FY 97 through FY 01 in the following categories:
Government Facilities, Public Safety, Library, Parks and
Recreation, Airport Authority, Stormwater Management, and the
Museum. The non-CIE capital projects approved in the FY 97 budget
process serve as the first year of the proposed plan.
It is important to note that the plan as presented excludes funding
for the County Jail expansion and the Immokalee Jail Center pending
determination of an appropriate revenue source(s).
As indicated previously, the principal revenue source for non-CIE
capital projects is a transfer from the General Fund. In FY 97,
the General Fund had an available pool of $5,505,700 allocated for
capital projects. In recognition of construction inflation and
total project requests exceeding available revenues, staff is
recommending a 4% annual increase in the total ad valorem dollars
allocated for capital projects. (Note: This increase in General
Fund support of capital projects will be addressed in the 3 year
analysis of ad valorem tax supported funds).
Even after including the 4% growth factor in General Fund dollars
allocated to capital projects, there is an overall shortfall of
$10,463,600 for the period from FY 97 through FY 01. (See attached
project summary). Staff feels it is important to inform the Board
of all project requests, prior to seeking direction regarding
alternatives to balance the plan.
This shortfall does not include a list of additional Sheriff's
Office requests that were received on Friday, January 17, 1997.
Many of these projects represent short-term capital needs that
would have otherwise been addressed had the Jail sales tax
referendum been approved by the voters. These projects represent
an additional $7,740,000 exclusive of the Jail expansion and
Immokalee Jail projects. If the $7,740,000 in additional pro~j~l£M
is included, the projected shortfall for the period from No. ~ ~ ~)
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg. !
FY 97 - FY 01 will increase to $18,203,600.
There are a number of alternatives available to balance this five
year non-CIE capital plan. These include: increasing the General
Fund ad valorem tax dollars allocated to capital projects, phasing
or deferring specific projects to coincide with the available
revenue stream, utilization of short-term borrowing mechanisms such
as the Commercial Paper program, or a combination of the above.
Staff is seeking BCC direction regarding the alternatives available
to balance this plan.
FISCAL M__~: The non-CIE capital plan, as presented, assumes a
4% anrual increase in the General Fund subsidy in FY 98 FY
01. This includes a General Fund subsidy of $5,725,900 in FY 98,
representing a $220,200 increase above the FY 97 level. Unless the
available pool of General Fund dollars allocated to capital
projects is increased, projects would have to either be deferred or
eliminated.
None.
~: That the Board of County Commissioners review the
5 Year non-CIE Capital Improvement Plan and provide policy
direction regarding balancing the plan.
PREPARED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Michael R. Smykowski, OMB Director
W. Neil Dorrill, County Manager
DATE: /-2/-~2
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg..
JAN 2 8 1997
Z ~
~I~NDA IT E
No. ~: [
JAN 2 8 199~
Z ~
~(3£ND^ I', ::vi
JAN 2 8 ~.:.
~,~.__/.o _
COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT LIST
COUNTY FUND 381
PRDSECT NAME FY 1998
FY 1999 FY E00B FY~801 SUBTOTAL
HAPLES JAIL EXPANSION
NEW IMMOKALEE JAIL
SUBTOTAL
PROJECTS NEEDED FOR JAIL:
NAPLES JAIL KITCHEN/LAUNDRY 150,000
NAPLES JAIL ELECTRONIC PANELS UPGRADE
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
)NE & DATA LINES UPGRADE
SUBTOTAL
25,080,000 OR UNTIL COMPLETION
150,000 2,000,000 OR UNTIL COMPLETION
$25,1~B,000 $2,000,000
$690,000
108,000
48,080
$140,000
SP, 150,0~
$27,150:0~
$158,0~
$100,B(
$80,BB
$590,B~
OTHER PROJECTS NEEDED:
E. NAPLES, GG, N. HAPLES
SUBSTATION EXPANSIONS
YEAR 2000 SOFTWARE
ORANGETREE SUBSTATION
JAIL VIDEO IMAGING
MOBIL DIGITAL TERMINALS
PC REPLACEMENT FOR EOUIP
OVER lB YEARS OLD
SUBTOTAL
500,000 1,000,000 1,000,800
590,000 290,000
10,000
300,000
1,200,000
1,000,009 $3,500,B~
300,000 390,900 390,090
100,090 1BO, BBB 100,000
$1,410,800 $1,690,009 $2,600,000
$700,9~
$1,E09, B~
$10,0~
$1,290,B~
$1,309,999
$300,0(
$6,910,0(
GRAND TOTAL $27,250,000 $3,740,000
TE: THE HEED FOR A NEW FLEET FACILITY STILL EXISTS.
$2,690,000
$1,3BB,OBB $3A,890,B(
AGENDA !'L * '-
No.
k [5 ).
JAN 2 8
Pg.__../! ..
~PPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY
2OMMITI'EE -
OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to serve 2 year term, expiring on February 4, 1999, and
appoint I member to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, expiring on February 4, 1998, on
the County Government Productivity Committee.
CONSIDERATIONS: This 13 member committee reviews the efficiency of departments of
County Government under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners. Terms are 2
years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup.
The term for James E. Cavanagh will expire on February 4, 1997 and a letter ofresigrmtion was
received from Marc Germer on November 4, 1996. The term vacated by Mr. Gertner will expire
on February 4, 1998.
A press release was issued and resumes were received bom the following 2 interested citizens:
APPLICANT
DISTRICT ELECTOR
Edward V. Ott (Attorney)
I yes
John R. Schoemer (Accountant/Businessman) 2
yes
RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT: Edward V. OR - 02/04/98
John R. Schoemer - 02/04/99
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment and appoint 2 members to the County Government
Productivity Committee, and direct the County attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the
appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson
Date: January 28, 1997
AGENDA ~I~/.~EM
-
JAN 2 8 1997
County Government Productivity Committee
Ntork Phone ,4ppt'd Exp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-a'pgt 2ndF.~Date 2nd Term
07/16/96 02/04/97 1 Year
SgS-l~O I/7/97 02/04/99 2 Year~
77~091 01/07/97 01106/98 I Year
Charles E. Getler
6855 San Marino Drive
Naples, FL 34108
District: 2
Category: Bu~ess Man~ement
Barbara B. Berry
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
District: 5
Category: BCC Vice C~
Daivd R. Craig
3106 N. Tam;~ml Trail #261
Naples, FL 34103
District: 4
Category: Business Management
Robert D. Laird
1765 Courtyard Way, #205-C
Naples, FL 34112
District: 1
Category: Real Esxate/In.nurance
261-2624 02/02/93 02/04/95 2 years
1/7/97 02/04/99 2 Years
Karl $ Otto
693 Seaview Ct., SSE A-704
Marco Island, FL 34145
District: 1
Category: Retired Engineer
07/16/96 02/04/97 I Year
793-0933 1/7/97 02/04/99 2 Years
11/07/95 02/04/96 3 Mo.
642-3798 11/7/95 02/04/98 2 Years
Edward T. Ferguson
215 Silver'ado Drive
Naples, FL 34119
District: 3
Category: Business Mgmt/Educa. tion
I 1654 Quail VillageWay 597-54~19
Naples, FL 34119
Distn'ct: 5
Category: Attorney
02;28195 02/04197 2 Years
I/7/97 02/04199 2 Years
03/26196 02/04/98 2 Years
AGEN[
JAN 2 8 1997
Po.
County G0vern'ment Productivity Committee
Name
Bernard L. Weiss
13455 Pond Apple Drive
Naples, FL 34119
D~tr~c~: 5
Category: Retired General
Robln Maretta
1780 Watson Road
Marco Island, FL 34145
District:
Category: Law F. aforccmeat
Joha E. Stock'ton
2230 Royal Lane
Naples, FL 34112
Distn'ct:
Category: Retired Busiacssmau
Bill L. Neal
3536 Windjamm~ Eircle #50
Naples, FL 34112
District: 5
Category: Reared Businessman
.tack (3. McKenaa
107 Flame Vine Drive
Naples, FL 341
District: 2
Category: Engineer
James £~ Cavanash
3870 Midshore Drive
Naples, FL 34109
District:
Category: Admini~tion
~Fork Phone Appt'd F. xp. Date Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2nd~'.xpDate 2nd Term
03/26/96 02/04/98 2 Years
694-7772
01/07/97 02/04/99
389-9252
1 II07/95 02/04/96
774..0~2 1 I/7/95 02/04/98
11/07/95 02/04/96
774-6325 1 I/7/95 02/04/98
597-3111 03/08/94 02/04/96
597°1596 2/26/96 02/04/98
10/03/95 02/04/97
591-3362
2 Years
2 Mo.
2 Years
3 Mo.
2 Years
2 Yem'~
2 Yeax~
I Yeax /
~Fednoday, J~u~&'y O& 1997
JAN 2 8 1997
County Government Productivity Committee
tFork Pttone ~4ppt'd Exp. Date 7'erin
ttomt Phone DateRe-appt 2ncLE. rpDate 2nd Term
This 13 member committee was created on 01/20/91 by Ord. No. 9%10 (amended by Ord. No.
93-13 & 96-10) to review the efficiency of deparlznenla of County Government under the
jurisdi~on of the BCC. Terms are 2 year~.
Staff; She~ Leith, Budget Analyst: 774-8578
JAN 2 8 1997
MEMORANDUM , ..
TO:
FROM:
SUE FILSON, ADMINISTKATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMN~SSIONERS //~
SHEILA LEITH, BUDGET ANALYST II, & STAFF LIASON TO
THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE
PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE VACANCIES
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1997
There are currently 2 vacancies on the County Government Productivity Committee. The
Committee h~s received 2 resumes for consideration. AppLicants were categorized ~s follows:
Edwazd V. Ott
5912 Cranbrook W~y H-206
Naples, FL 34112
Attorney
John R. Schoemer
501 The Dorchester
6075 PeLican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
Accountant/Businessman
The Productivity Committee is recommending that the Board of County Commissioners
appoint these candidates to £dl the current vacancies.
Thank you for your ass~ance. Please call if you have any questions.
AN 2 8 19S7
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
January 13, 1997
Vi_nell Hills, Elections Oftice
Sue Filson, Ad~nlstrative Assi~.
Board of County Commissioners
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointm~ts
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for
appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed
below are registered voters ia Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district ia which each applicant resides.
COUNTY GOVT PRODUCTIVITY COMM COMMISSION DISTRICT
Edward V. Ott
5912 Cranbrook Way H-206
Naples, FL 34112
John R. Schoemer
501 The Dorchester
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
Thank you for your help.
llo.~
JAN 2 B 1997
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
January 13, 1997
Sheila Leith, Budget Analyst . ,~.
Sue Filsoa, Administrative Asststm~ '
Board of County Commissioners ~ '
County Government Productivity Committee
As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued reques'd.ng ¢itize~ intere~ed in ~rving on tiffs committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Edward V. Ott
5912 Cranbrook Way H-206
Naples, FL 34112
John R. Schoemer
501 The Dorchester
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation of the advisory committee for appointment and
I will prepare an executive ~tmmary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the
applicanU ~a area~ of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me'at 774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
January. 6, 1997
EDWARD V. OTT
5912 CRANBROOK WAY H-206
NAPLES, FL 34112
[9,,11775-0968
Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of Count~ CommiSsioners
3301 US 41 East
Naples, FL 34112
Re: Vacancy on the County. Government Productivity Committee
Dear Ms. Filson:
Please accept this letter a.s my application for consideration to the
above.mentioned committee. I am applying because I feel there is more to life after
retirement th~ playing at golf. Briefly:
1989.
Name: Edward V. Ott
Residence: 5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112
Telephone: [94 I] 775-0968
Wife's name: Patricia
Resident: Permanent since 1991; part-time since 1984; property owner
since 1980.
I retired from my law practice in 1987 and from the Michigan Bar Association in
Attached is a brief resume of my work experience.
Very truly yours,
encl.
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg .-.-~-~
L
RESUME
EDWARD V. OTT
OCCUPATION:
Retired
,~)DRESS:
MARITAL STATUS:
5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112
[941] 775-0968
Married
EDUCATION:
J.D. Law, Detroit College of Law
L.L.D. Law, Detroit College of Law
Undergraduate, Detroit Institute of Technology.
MILITARY:
GENERAL EXPERIENCE:
Retired 1st. Lt., AUS
Arbitration
Attorney, with specialty, in labor law
Mgr. Industrial Relations, Allied Products
Labor Relations Manager, Studebaker-Packard
Div. Supervisor, Personnel & Labor'Relat'iS~, Ford Motor
Federal Attorney, Veteran's Affairs
AGENDA I~4_
No._
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg._ q -
JOHN R. $CHOEMER
S01 The Dorchester
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, lqorlda 34105
(941) $66=2483
J'anuary 2, 1997
Ms. Sue Fiison
Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 U.S. 41 East
Naples. FL 34112
Dear Ms. Filson:
I saw the notice in the Daily News that the County Commission is seeking applicants for positions
on The Coumy Government Productivity Committee.
I believe that I would be a good candidate for this Committee, and would like very much to serve
on it. I am semi-retired and have recently become a legal resident &Naples.
My background as an accountant and partner with Arthur Andersen & Co., one of the largest
accounting firms in the world, and currently as a director of several companies would work well
with this committee. I have spent my entire career assisting companies, not-for-profits, and
governmental units in managing their costs and operations. Attached is my resume which gives
my employment history in greater detail.
Please let me know if there is anything further I can do to assist this process further.
/~/~Sincerely. /7
AGENDA LTEH
JAN 2 8 lgg?
JOHN R. SCHOEMER
~01 The Dorchester
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34 ! 08
941-566..248.3
ard i e ' c
E-Z Serve Corp (AMEX) 1993-present
$700 million convenience store and gasoline station operator
Member or' Audit and Compensation Committees
Active participant in acquisitions strategy and implementation
Metal Powder Products Company (Private) 1992-present
S35 million metals processor
Member of'Audit and Compensation committees
Directed recent recapitalization and refinancing
Flomet Corp (Private) 1993-present
5;6 million metals processor ,.
Member of' Audit Committee
Active participant in development of'marketing and growth strategies
Cambric Corporation 1996-present
5;6 million start up software venture
Chairman of'Executive Committee
Active oversight ot'management and strategy
Direct marketing and growth strategies
Member of'Audit and Compensation Committees
COO NAR Group Ltd. and Quadrant Management Inc., NYC 1991-Present
NAR is offshore investment joint venture which controls Hano, ver Direct
QMI is U.S, management company
· Installed financial reporting and communication policies ~th joint venture
partners that ended existing fi'iction and distrust over results
· Negotiated and supervised sale of'investment oil refinery
· Supervised operation and eventual s~le of European subsidia~es
· Active management of subsidiary and investment companies
EV'P Hanover Direct, Weehawken, NJ ! 993-1995
AMEX direct marketer with stable of 15 catalogs
· Strategized, negotiated and integrated acquisition of'Company Store
catalog out ofbankruptcy
· In first year ~rned $6 million EBIT on $55 million volume
· Created, developed and marketed new wholesale line to
complement existing line for captive factory operation
· Installed or updated all new procedures in factory, iq ~
personnel, cost accounting, quality control and t~ni tg No..~
JAN 2 8 1997
-2-
EVP Hanover Direct, Weehawken, NJ (Continued)
. Strategized and negotiated acquisition of'Gump's catalog and landmark
retail store in San Francisco
· Managed transition and installation of'new company-wide on-line computer
system, including operating as interim head of'MIS department
COO Tiger Direct, Inc.. Miami FL February-July 1995
Public company in direct marketing of'computers
· As CO0 of'fast growing but unprofitable catalog computer marketer.
developed and installed procedures, controls, qualified personnel and
disciplines to become profitable
· Assignment ended when Hanover Direm terminated plans for equity
investment
CFO National Football League and World League ; ' 1984-1991
· Supervised all financial and computer operations of'League O~ce
· Served as League representative on Owners' Finance Committee
Member of'governing boards of Player and Executive Pension Plans
· Member of'founding group of World League (international football)
Partner Arthur Andersen & Co., NYC 1974-1984
· Partner in charge oflargest audit division in New York ofiqce
· Engagement responsibility for major clients, including Merck, American
Home Products, Marsh & McLennan, Colgate, NFL, New York Giants.
Bantam Books, Arista Records
· Member o£numerous national committees addressing. Grmwlde issues
o
Accountant, Arthur Andersen & Co., NYC 1962-I968, 1972-1974
Controller, Filmways Inc,, NYC 1968-1972
AMEX producer of'films and tele~sion series
MBA,'Rutgers University, 1962
AB, Hamilton College, 1961
CPA. New York. 1965
AGENDb ~ T E4't
JAN 2 8
Pg ..~~
SENT BY:CC HOUSINO AUTHORITY ; 1-21-97 ;10:28A~1 ;
CCHA"' 9417744010;# 1
THE LAKE TRAFFORD
RESTORATION TASK FORCE
January 24, 1997
Nell Dorr~
County Manager
Collier County Government Center
3301 East Tamiami Tra/I
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Neff:
As the Chainnan of the Lake Trafford Restoration Task Force I am pleased to announce that our
task force mmnbers have located some f'tmding under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Critical
Restoration Program. This is a 50% matching program. Th~ Florida Department of
Environmental Program (FDEP) has taken the lead to apply for fi. rods for the restoration of Lake
Tr~Yord. Our project has passed two cuts and comes up for review again on February 4th in
West Palm Beach. To support this application, the task force .would appreciate the following:
I. That the Board of County Commissioners officially endorse the application.
2. 'l'hat the Board of County Commissioners allow Staff to serve as the facilitators for raising
matching funds, most of which will come fi.om various State agencies.
3. Serve as the applicant for the dredging permits. This will allow all fees to be waived by the
StaTe.
4. Allow Dr. Ga~l Gibson to attend the presentation meeting in Palm Beach County on the 4th of
February to support FDEP staff in their presentation of our project.
Attached please find a copy of FDEP's face page to the application. You will notice on the top, a
break-out of funds appropriated to data on this project. Because of the persons that serve on our
task force we were able, without cost to the county or lask force, to receive goods and services in
the amount of $100,000, to defray the cost of preparing the dredging permit and this gram
application. Of that $I00,000, $30,000 is in-kind already received becau.-.e of county ~affs
efforts.
You will note on thc attached f~ tl'~t ~ of this i,,~rmation has just been released, therefore, 1
was unable to get it to you in a timel7 mmn~ for expeditious approw. L However, I iclnda wanna
ask you to work ya magt¢ and make this an add-on for next Tuesday. But, understanding the real
world, it might be appropriate to reques~ placing it as an add-on to the February 4th agenda, early
SENT. BY:CC HOU$INB AUTHORITY ; 1-21-91
; CCHA- 9t~77tt010;~ 2
eaough for us to fax the County's s~port in.~orrnadon to our team in PaLm Beac~ by 10 AM on
February 4th. If you sre a~le to ~ m~.g~c, al, ~e w~le world ~ know how appreciative we are.
Thank you v~ry much for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Fred N. Thomas, Jr.
Ctaim~
B~rbara Berry, Vice Chairmm
Timothy Hancock, Chairman
Pamela MacKie
$ohn Norris
Timothy Constantine
TO
.:
P.g2
~i ]~ ~ng p . me~ ~ a long..
. ,' :.:. . . ,j ...
EXECUTIVE SUMMAry
PETITION NUMBER: PUD-81-30 (1), PETER L. BRETON, REPRESENTING MANOR
CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC., REQUESTING TO A/~END THE LELY PALMS OF
NAPLES PUD DOCUMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF REPLACING FIFTY (50) OF THE
APPROVED "FUTURE RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS" WITH 50 ASSISTED LIVING
UNITS WITH A COMMON KITCHEN FACILITY SERVING THE 50 ALF UNITS AND TO
ADD AN ADULT DAY CARE FACILITY. THE PETITIONER iS ALSO REQUESTING TO
CHANGE THE SETBACK ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY BOUNDARY FROM 30 FEET TO
20 FEET AND TO REVISE THE MASTER PI2~N TO REFLECT THE CHANGES FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD
(CR-864) IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST.
~ This petition seeks to rezone the subject property from
PUD to PUD to amend the Lely Palms of Naples Planned Unit Development
(PUD) as noted above.
CONSIDERATION~ Lely Palms of Naples PUD comprises approximately
23.5 acres and is approved for 296 independent residential apartment
dwelling units of which 12 units are designated as congregate
assistive care or (ALF). The PUD also allows for 120 nursing care
beds. The proposed amendment to shift 50 residential apartments into
assisted living units will allow for greater flexibility in meeting
the residents changing lifestyle needs. As a result of this change,
the PUD will allow for 234 residential apartments, 62 assisted living
units and 120 private or semiprivate nursing care beds. In this way,
residents who can no longer live independently but do not require
skilled nursing care will have an on site assisted care option.
Currently, the project is nearly completed and contains two - three
story residential apartment buildings containing 200 units, 34 villa
units and 12 assisted living units. It also has a health center with
120 beds and a one story commons area that has also been completed.
This represents 246 units of the approved 296 units allowed by this
PUD. The remaining future 50 apartments are proposed to be developed
as 50 assisted living units.
The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use (Urban Residential
Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map and Element (FLUE) of the
Growth Management Plan. .The density for an assisted living facility
is 26 units per acre in this area. The proposed 50 additional ALF
units results in 2.7 units per acre. The overall project has been
developed at approximately 10 units per acre. Since the proposed
amendment does not authorize any additional independent dwelling
units over the amount currently approved, this petition is consistent
with the Growth Management Plan.
1
AGENDA M
JAN 2, 8 1997
P~. _ /
The Traffic Impact Review indicates that the proposed amendment will
reduce the site generated trips versus the trips that could be
generated by the currently approved project. As a result, the
amendment doesn't exceed the significance test for Rattlesnake
Hammock Road and is considered consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of
the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE).
This is a PUD amendment even though the process is one of rezoning
the land from "PUD to PUD". The intent is to achieve a level of
administrative convenience because it avoids the requirement to track
amendments and their relationship to the original document in order
to understand the totality of the regulations as they apply to the
PUD zoning district. For this reason staff is of the opinion that the
required findings for standard and PUD rezones do not apply in
recognition of the fact that when the property was initially rezoned
the decision to approve the subject PUD was based upon a
preponderance of evidence and conditions which supported the required
findings for PUD rezoning actions.
The petitioner is also requesting to reduce the setback distance from
30 feet to 20 feet only along the eastern boundary. Since this
property line abuts a preserve tract in the adjacent Lely Resort PUD,
no residential structures will be affected. The only structure
involved will be the 120 bed Health Center. The balance of the
project is built-out along the eastern side. Based on the above
referenced analysis, staff is of the opinion that this amendment will
not adversely impact any level of service standard.
The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on
January 2, 1997 and recommended approval by a 7 to 0 vote.
FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal
impact on the County. However, if this amendment achieves its
objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new
development has been approved will result in a future fiscal impact
on County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior
to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of
each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are
used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element needed to
maintain adopted levels of service for public facilities. In the
event that impact fee collections are inadequate to maintain adopted
levels of service, the County must provide supplemental funds from
other revenue sources in order to build the needed facilities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ~MPACT~ Approval of this amendment to the Lely
Palms of Naples PUD does nothing to change the original development
in terms of the density/intensity of development. The subject
property is located within the Urban/Residential area as designated
on the Future Land Use Map. Therefore the proposed chan~e is
consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Grow~-n M t
JAN 8 1997
That the Board of County
Commissioners approve Petition PUD-S1-30 (1) as described by the
Ordinance of Adoption and made part of this Executive Summary.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
~ICP
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP
PLANNING SERVICES DLRECTOR
/5..~._~.. 1~ / '
INCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINIST~TOR
COMITY D~. ~D ~IRO~ENTAL SVCS.
RVB/rb/EXSUMMARY
/-__~7
DATE
DATE
DATE
3
AGENDA~T~I~ ~
JAN 2 8 1997
AGENDA ITEM
TO=
FROM~
DATE:
AaENT/~PLICANT~
Agent:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COM/47JNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
DECEMBER 12, 1996
PETITION NO: PUD-81-30 (1) LELY PALMS OF NAPLES PUD
Applicant:
Peter Breton
Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Kolins,
Raymond & Sheehan, P.A.
625 N. Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. (Lessee)
10770 Columbia Pike
Silver Springs, MD 20901
The subject property is located on the south side of Rattlesnake
Hammock Road (CR-864) in Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East.
(See illustration following page)
E US ED C ON:
The petitioner is requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD to amend the
Lely Palms of Naples Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of
replacing fifty (50) of the approved "future residential apartments"
with 50 assisted living units with a common kitchen facility serving
the 50 assisted living units and to add an adult day care facility. The
petitioner is also requesting to change the setback along the east
property boundary from 30 feet to 20 feet and to revise the Master Plan
to reflect the changes.
PURPOSE D S ON O O' =
Lely Palms of Naples Pm comprises approximately 23.5 acres and is
approved for 296 independent residential apartment dwelling wits of
which 12 units are designated as congregate assistive care or (~F).
The PUD also allows for 120 nursing care beds. The proposed ~endment
to shift 50 residential apartments into assisted living units will
allow for greater flexibility in meeting the residents changing
~lifestyle needs. As a result of this change, the PUD will allow for 234
.¥Jresidential apartments, 62 assisted living units and 120 ~1
--1--
m
,D
-- AGEN DA,4TEI~ %.
.JAN 2 8, ~997
beds. In this way, residents who can no longer live independently but
do not require skilled nursing care will have an on site assisted care
option. Currently, the project is nearly completed and contains two -
three story residential apartment buildings containing 200 units, 34
villa units and 12 assisted living units. It also has a health center
with 120 beds and a one story commons area that has also been
completed. This represents 246 units of the appro~,ed 296 units allowed
by this PUD. The remaining future 50 apartments are proposed to be
developed as 50 assisted living units.
Existing Conditions: The development is mostly developed and is zoned PUD.
Surrounding: North - Rattlesnake-Hammock Road~ Zoned: "A".
East - Residential~ Zoned "Lely Country Club PUD".
South - Residential and vacant land; Zoned "PUD".
West - Residential; Zoned: "PUD".
GRO M~-%rA NT O
This petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff for compliance
with the applicable elements of the GMP, as noted below:
~ The subject property is designated Urban
Mixed Use (Urban Residential Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map
and Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. The density for an
assisted living facility is 26 units per acre in this area. The
proposed 50 additional ALF units results in 2.7 units per acre. The
overall project has been developed at approximately 10 units per acre.
Since the proposed amendment does not authorize any additional
independent dwelling units over the amount currently approved, this
petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. .
a 'c C' u t o e · The Traffic Impact Review indicates that
the proposed amendment will reduce the site generated trips versus the
trips that could be generated by the currently approved project. The
switch from the 50 independent living apartments to 50 assisted living
units will reduce the site generated traffic by approximately 250 trips
per day. As a result, the-amendment doesn't exceed the significance
test for Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and is considered consistent with
Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE).
'c ble m s' Staff review indicates that this petition has
been designed to account for the necessary relationships dictated by
the Gro%~ah Management Plan. Where appropriate mitigation measures and
stipulations have been generated to ensure consistency with GMP during
the permitting process. Development permitted by the approval of this
petition will be subject to a concurrency review under
of Section 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development
-2-
JAN 2 8 1997
Public Facilities, at the earliest or next to occur of either Final SDP
approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable
to this development. Therefore, the proposed PUD amendment is
consistent with the GMP.
Staff has concluded that no level of service standards will be
adversely affected by this amendment. Appropriate mitigation measures
and stipulations will assure that the County's interests are
maintained. Consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of
other applicable elements of the GMP and level of service relationships
are to be achieved by stipulations and/or development commitments made
a part of the approval of this development order. Development
permitted by this project is subject to a concurrency review under the
provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as contained in
Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code at the earliest or next to
occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building
permit issuance. As a result, this petition is deemed consistent with
the Growth Management Plan.
~vALU~TION FOR ENVIRON~ENT~L, TRANSPORTATION ~RD INFRASTRUCTURE=
This peri=ion was referred to all appropriate County agencies for their
review. Since no level of service standards will be adversely affected
by this amendment, these agencies have recommended approval subject to
appropriate stipulations that are consistent with the LDC. The
Transportation staff has no comment concerning this amendment.
This is a PUD amendment even though the process is one of rezoning the
land from "PUD to PUD". The intent is to achieve a level of
administrative convenience because it avoids the requirement to track
amendments and their relationship to the original document in order to
understand the totality of the regulations as they apply to ~he PUD
zoning district. For this reason staff is of the opinion that the
required findings for standard and PUD rezones do not apply in
recognition of the fact that when the property was initially rezoned
the decision to approve the subject PUD was based upon a preponderance
of evidence and conditions which supported the required findings for
PUD rezoning actions.
Because of the proposed changes and a building addition, the petitioner
is requesting to reduce the setback distance from 30 feet to twenty
feet only along the eastern boundary. This property line abuts a
preserve tract in the Lely Resort PUD, so no residential structures
will be affected. The only structure involved will be the 120 bed
Health Center, since the balance of the project is built-out along the
eastern side.
JAN 2, 8 1997
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward
Petition PUD-81-30 (1) to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation for approval.
PREPARED BY:
PRO~EC~
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
~Yo~%RF~T PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER
DATE
DATE
Staff Report for January 2, 1997 CCPC meeting.
NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 28, 1997.
BCC meeting.
COLLI ER COUNTY P~~ COMMISSION:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN
RVB/rb/STAFF REPORT/PUD-81-30 (1)
-4-
JAN 2 8 1997
PETITION NUKB~
DATE
APPLICATION ~OR PUBLIC RT.%RING
FOR
PUD AMZNDMENT/DO AMENDMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPKE~T DMSION
PLANNING SERVICES
Name of Applicant(s) MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC.
Applicant's ~ailing Address 10770 Columbia Pike
city Silver S ri~ State MD zip 20901
Applicant's Telephone Number: Res.: Bus.:301-681-9400
Is the applicant the owner of the subject property?
Yes _____X__No
.... (a) If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name
beneficiaries below.
(b) If applicant is corporation other than a public
corporation, so indicate and name officers and major
stockholders below.
X
(c) If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership
or other business entity, so indicate and name
principals below.
(d) If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as
recorded, and list all other owners, if any.
(e) If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and.
indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease.
(f) If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of
-- contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address
below.
OWNER: NAPLES RETIREMENT, INC.
(If space l~nadequate,-~ach on separate page.)
Moyle, Flanigan, Katz,
2. Name of Agent Peter L. Bret--.Firm Kolins Ra ond & Sheehan, P.A
Agents Mailing Address 625 N. Fla~ Ninth Floor
AG£ND~*IT£M%
City West ~ State ~ zip 33
Telephone Nuunber: Res.: Bus.: 561-659
1997
4. DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE
APPLICATION (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If
request involves change to more than one zoning district, include
separate legal description for property involved in each district.
If property is odd-shaped, submit five (5) copies of survey (1" to
400' scale).
PUD ORDINANCE NAME AND NUHBER: ~_~ Palms of Naples P.U.D. Ord. No. !
THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL
DESCRIPTION. IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION,
AN ENGINe_ER ' S CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED.
SECTION 21
TOWNS~IP ~ R~GE ~~
SEE ATTACHMENT'1
Address or location of subject property 1000_______Lely Palms Drive,
Naoles, Florida 33962
Does property owner own contiguous property to the subject
property? If so, give complete legal description of entire
contiguous property· (If space is inadequate, attach on
separate page)· o ' ' v
Countr Club Tan w .... lat
thereof, recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 114, Public Records of
Collier Count Florida.
TYPE OF AMENDMENT:
X A PUD Document Language Amendment
X B. PUD Master Plan Amendment
C. Development Order Language Amendment
DOES AMENDMENT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
No If no, explain:
X Yes
HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD ON THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE
LAST YEAR? IF SO, IN WHOSE NAME? Not to aoolicant's knowledge.
PETITION $: DATE:
JAN 8 1997
HAS ANY PORTION OF THE PUD BEEN _~ SOLD AND/OR_.y_es
DEVELOPED? ARE ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR TH~ AREA SOLD AND-7~
DEVELOPED?
__~__Yes. No. IF YES, DESCRIBE: (ATTACH
ADDITIONAJ~ SHEETS IF NECESSARY).
SEE ATTACHM£NT_~2
We, , ~ ~ being first duly sworn,
depose and say that we are the ew~e=s*of the property described
herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing;
that all the answers to the questions in this application, and all
sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and
made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best
of our knowledge and belief. We understand this application must
be completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised. We
further permit the undersigned to act as our representative in any
matters regarding this Petition. *Lessee ·
NOTE: S IGNAT~q~ZS OF ALL OWNERS ARE MANDAT~ / /~
SIGNATUP~E OF OWqqER ~~'
County of ~ ~~
.,The .foregoing Application was6ackno~edged be.~ore me this
personally known to ~e or who has produce
as identification and who did (did not)
take an oath.
(Print Name of Notary Pu--~)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Serial/Commission fl
My Commission Expires:
JAN g 8 1997
090695-1
4070B
AGENT'S AUTHORIZATION
Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc., hereby authorizes and appoints
MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P.A. ("Moyle,
Flanigan") to act in its behalf and represent it in all matters
pertaining to application for a PUD amendment pertaining to the
property described on Exhibit "A".
It further authorizes Moyle, Flanigan to act as its exclusive
agent and to execute any and all documents required to obtain the
foregoing approval. Moyle, Flanigan is further authorized to
agree to any and all conditions of approval or modifications
thereto which may be imposed by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida.
Executed this day of November, 1996
STATE OF~[~FY~ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged ke~ore me this
day .9f'~~Z~_____, 1996 by__.4~k~~_~m~____ __
as /'~ ~ ' of Manor Care o~w' Boynton Beach~
a ~corporation,
er.sonallknown to me, OR
as identificati~-n.
(NOTAPY STAMP)
Inc.
on behalf of the corporation, who is
has produced
Notary Public
Serial (Commission) Number
(if any)
NOT~Y I'UBUC STATE
WILSON- MILLER
PLANNEIt$. EN¥11tON~E~T~L CONSULTAN?$. ENGIN£ER$o
SUItV£YORS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, CONSTRt;CTION MANAGERS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Ray Bellows
December 13, 1996
Lel)' Manor Care PUD Amendment
Enclosed are the ownership documents you requested. I don't believe that they can be any more
specific because Manor Care, Inc. is a publicly traded company.
Please give me a call if you need any thing further.
JAN 2 8 1997
ORD '~ NAt~C~,
AN OIII)JNANCE AMI:NDZNG ORDINANCE NUMIIRR
91-]02, TIlE COLIJER COUNTY LAND
DEVI~LOPMENT CODE, WIIZCII INCLUDES TIlE
COMPREIII:.N~ZVE ZONING R~GU~T~ONS FOR TIlE
UN~NCOItI'ORATI:D AR/.:A OF COLI, I ER COUNTY,
F~R~DA, DY AMENDTNG TIlE OFF~CZA~ ZONING
A~I,AR MAP NIIM~R~D 0~2]N AND BY CIIANC~NG
· IIR ~ONIN~ CI,A~IFICA'I'ION
I)E~CI~]III.3) IH:Al. I'I~OI'I:WI'Y I.'ltOH "[*UD" TO
"PUD" PLANNED Ut~T DEVEI~PMI:NT KNOWtt AS
~E~Y PALMS OF NAI'I,E5, FOR
~CA~D A? 1000 LE~Y PALMS D~ZV~, ZN
SE~ZON 21~ TOWNSHZP 50 SOUTH, ~NGE 26
EAST, ICOLLZER COU~TY~ F~R~DA, CO~S~STING
OF 23.5 ACRES ~ORE OR LESS; PROV~Dlt~G FOR
THE REPEAL OF O~DltJANCE NUMBER 82-25, AS
AHEt~DED, THE FORMER LELY PA~S OF NAPLES
PUD; AND ~y P~OV~D~IG AN EFFC~VE DATE.
WHEREAS, Pctor L. Dro~on, Esquire o£ Moyle, F/an/gan, Xatz,
Xoline, Raymond & Sheohan, P.A., representing Manor Care of Boynton
Beach, Inc., Petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of the herein described real property;
NOW TIIEREFORD DE ~T ORDAINED BY TIlE BOM{D OF COUt~T¥ COMMISSIONERS~
OF COLLIER COUt~TY, FLORIDA;
The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property
located in Section 2[, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit
Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part
hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Numbered 0621N, as described in
Ordinance Number 91-[02, the Collier County Land Development Code, are
hereby emended accordingly.
Ordinance Number B2-25, as amended, known as the Lely Palms of
Naples PUD, adopted on April 20, [982 by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety.
-[.
JAN 2 8 1997
This Ordinance shall becose effective upon filing vith the
Depar~men~ of State.
PASSZD A~ DULY ~OPTED by the Board of County Conissioners of
Collier Counk~, Florida, this da~ of , 1997.
ATTEST:
DWZGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLITR COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPROVED AS TO FOPJ4 AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
,~'5~%~ KARJORIE M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COU~TY ATTOP4~EY
PUD-S1-30 (1) ORDINANCE/18?65
BY:
-2-
JAN 2 8 1997
TO
APPLICATION FOR PUD AMENDMENT
;75
LELY PALMS OF NAPLES
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED IN SECTION 21,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH
RANGE 26 EAST
Date Issued~
Approved by CAPC.~.._.3..~
Approved by
Ordinance No,.._
Date Issued
Approved by CCPC~
Approved by BCC__
OrdinanceNo.__~ ~
J/~N 2 8 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SECTION II
STATEMENT OF INTENT
SECTION III
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
SECTION V
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
PAGE
1-2
3
4-5
6-7
8-9
AG [ N_D/~, IT[M/\
JAN 2 8 1997
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The purpose of this section is to express the intent of Retirement Corporation of America, P.O.
Box 1537, Bradenton, Florida 33506 ~ develop 23.54- acres of land loca~cl in part of Section 21,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The r~me of this proposed
development shall henceforth be known as Lely Palms of Naples.
The development of the Lely Palms of Naples as a Planned Unit Development will be in
compqance wit~ the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan. The residential development and recreation and health care facilities will
be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Element and other applicable documents for the following reasons:
State of Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3177 as amended in I980, states that local
governments must provide adequate sites for future housing, including housing for
low-income and moderate-income families, mobile homes, and group home facilities and
fos-~er care facilities, with supporting infrastructure and community facilities, in the local
Government's Comprehensive Plan. When the County adopted the Comprehensive Plan
on May 8, 1979, this requirement was not taken into consideration of the design of the
future land use element as the Local Government's Comprehensive Planning Act was
amended in late 1980. Therefore, the present Collier County Comprehensive Plan does
not reflect sufficient future sites to guide development of group home facilities and foster
care facilities.
This project will serve to partially fulfill the County's obligation to provide for health-care
facilities associated with residential retirement communities.
This project will provide an alternative housing source for residents seeldng retkement
shelter.
The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate
community facilities and services.
4. The project development is'compatible and complimentary to the surrounding land uses.
5. Ail improvements will be in compliance with all applicable regulations.
o
The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community
facilities and services.
7. The project development will make available housing to meet the special
10.
11.
elderly and the retirement commtmity of Collier County and in particular the Greater
The project development will. provide n'ansportation by way of bus for residents of the
community, thereby, conserving energy ~md minimizing excessive movement of traffic.
The project ~'ponsor has filed for Certificate of Need a~d sl~all receive approval from the
appropriate agencie~ prior to the iss~,anee of building permits. See Ezhibit "A."
The project development will provide health care capability to those patients who require
limited life support a~d ~re unable to meet the criteria for hospitalization.
The environmentally sensitive ~reas adjacent to the property present natural recreational
features beneficial to residents of the retirement and elderly community.
AG E N DA.,IT~ M,/~.
JAN g 8 1997
SECTION II
STATEMENT OF INTENT
It is the property owner's intention to commence development of a health-integrated program for
a group retirement community which will incorporate a licensed skilled narsing care home facility
together with various social, recreational, dining, and medical support facilities, geared to the
needs of the retired residents of the project.
The l.ely Palms of Naples shall offer a planned program of an alternative way of life for the aging,
an alternative which promotes their physical, psychological, and social well-being, in turn,
extending their lives. Upon completion of development, the Lely Palms of Naples will contain
the following structures and facilities, as shown on the Sitc Plan, WMP&B File No. PZ-
6IA,dated August 28, 1996.
2-3 story residential apartment buildings, each containing a maximum of 125 dwelling
units (of which 50 dwelling units shall be used as assisted living units).
12-I story leisure living units (congregate assistive care).
34-I story Multiplex Units with a maximum of 4 units per building.
Licensed health center which will contain a maximum of 120 private or
semi-private patient rooms, together with medical support and administrative
facilities common to skilled nursing care.
A commons area containing a kitchen, dining, social, recreational, h'brary,
gift-beauty shop, administrative and utilitarian services and facilities for the
exclusive use of project residents and invited guests.
A chapel.
Various outdoor recreational areas and facilities.
- A golf-cart/pedestrian/bike path extending throughout the project area.
- A project ear wash, laundry and maintenance facility.
- Man.made lakes and lake-to-lake pipes and swales.
An adult daycare program/area.
JAN 2 8 G97
Thc Lely Palms of Naples project will not be subdivided.
managed by a non-profit organization.
SECTION ltl'
The entire project, will be owned and
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIFrlON
3.1.
PROPERTY OWNl~grq~p:
3.2,
The subject property is currently or, reed by Lely Estates, Inc., 105 St. A~drews
Boulevard, Naples, Florida 33942, ~nd is trader purcl~se conu'act agreement with
Retirement Corporation of America, Inc. (agents for Naples Retirement, Inc.)
LEGAL D~-~CRIPTION:
Ali of that tract or parcel of land lying a~d being in Section 21, Tow~shlp 50
South. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, a~d being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the point of intersection of the west line of Section 21 and the
Southerly right-of-way line of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (C-864). run South
890-27'-05" East along the said fight-of-way line for 2.00 feet; thence run South
89o-18-20" East along said fight-of-way line for 581.21 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
thence continue South 89o..18'-20' Fast along said right-of-way for 1012.46 fee~;
thence South 18o-25'-12' Eas~ for 483.06 fee~;
thence South 16o-13'-52" Wes~ for 890.35 feet;
thence South 86o-58'~4' Wes~ for 327.18 fee~ ~o the Easterly boundary of the
proposed Tanglewood Subdivision;
Said point lying on a curve concave sou~westerly; '
thence following along the an: of said curve ia a nord:westerly direction, (said
curve having a central angle of 15o-01'-24', a radius of 1290.00 feet, a chord of
337.28 feet, and a chord bearing of North I0o-32'-08" West) for 338.25 feet;
thence South 71o-57'-I0" West for 150.00 feet to the No~erly right-of-way line
of the proposed St.'Amlrews Boulevard, said point lying on a curve concave
southwesterly;
thence following along the arc of said curve in a Northwesterly direction, (said
curve having a cenmal angle of 5o.00'-28", a radius of 1140.00 feet, a chord of
99.61 feet, and a chord bearing of North 200-33'-04' West), for 99.64 feet;
thence North 66o-56'-42" East for 150.00 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way
boundary of the proposed Tanglewood Subdivision, said point ly_~g o,, o ,',,we
AO £N DA/~T. E~ \
~ e~ C-~1~m~e.~d 4 NO. ~
,JAN 2 8 lgg7
Pi. ~
concave Southwesterly;
thence fotlow~g along the arc of said curve in a Northwesterly direction, (said
curve having a central ~gle of 26o-19'.46", a radius of 1290.00 feet, a chord of
587.60 feet, a chord bearing of North 36o-IY-11" West), for 592.80 feet;
thezace North 490-23'.04" West for 8.82 feet, to a point of curvature, said curve
lying concave Southwesterly;
th~ce along the arc of said curve Northwesterly, (said curve having a central angle
of $o-I5'-16", a radius of 1790.00 feet, a chord of 164.10 feet, a chord bearing of
North 52o-00'-42" West) for 164.16 feet;
thence South 34o-43'-16" West for 150.0I feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way
of St. A~ctrews Boulevard, said point lying on a curve concave Southwesterly, (said
curve having a radius of 1640.00 feet, a central angle of 2o-47'-43", a chord of
80.00 feet, a chord bearing of North 55o-58'-40" West) for 80.01 feet;
thence North 34o-43'-16" East for 254.43 feet;
thence North 00o-:~2'.55' East for I94.21 feet to the Southerly right-of-way line
of Rattlesmake Hammock Road, (C-$64), and the Point of Beginning.
The above described tract is subject to all easements, rights-of-way, reservations,
and restrictions of record, and entails 23.529 acres, more or less.
AG£ND$ ITeM \
JAN 2 8 1997
S£CTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
4.1.
Thc purpose of this Section is to set forth the re~tlations for development of the
property identified on the M~t~r Development Plan. It ~ ~c intent of the project
sponsor to develop a health care-integrated program for a residential retirement
4.2.
The project plan including internal private street layout is illustrated in Exhibit A,
Site Plan, WMP&B File No. RZ-61A, dated August 28, I996. The project shall
consist of the following structures and facilities.
2-3 story residential apartment buildings, each contaiaing a maximum of 125
dwelling units (of which 50 dwelling units shall be used as assisted living units).
12 - One Story leisure living units (congregate assisdve care).
34-1 Story Multiplex Units with a maximum of 4 units per building.
1 - One Story licensed health center which will contain a maximum of 120 private
or semi-private patient rooms, together with medical support and administrative
facilities common to skilled nursing care.
A Commons Area, containing a kitchen, dining, social recreational, Library,
gift-beauty shop, administrative and utilitarian services and facilities. .
A chapel.
- Various outdoor recreational areas and facilities;
- A golf cart/pedestriatVbike path.
A car wash, laundry and maintenance facility.
Manmade lakes and lake-to-lake pipes and swales.
- An adult daycare program/area.
AG E .N D,¥1T~M \
JAN 2 8 1997
4.3,
'4.4.
4.5.
4.6.
4.7.
Priucipal and ace. essory bttildings shall be developed general/), as indicated on the master
plan. No principal bei/dings ahall be closer together than one-half the sum of their heights.
No building shall be closer to a property boundary than 30 feet or one-half the building
height, whichever is greater, except along the eastern property boundary adjacent to the
'PR" Cypress Preserve Trac~ in the Lely Resort PUD, which shall be twenty (20) feet.
3 stories above the base flood elevation for the apartments.
1 story above the base flood elevation for all other structures.
296 Maximum living dwelling units.
120 Maxh-num beds in the health center.
350 Square feet
330 covered and uncovered parking spaces shall be constructed. The Zoning
Director may require that additional space shall be provided if a need for such
additional spaces is demonstrated after the project is occupied.
As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building
permit.
Ail applicable Life Safety Codes will be complied with. For the purposes of
Building Code Regulations, the health center portion of this PUD is hereby
designated as a Fire District as described ha the Southern Standard Building Code
as adopted by Collier County.
SECTION V
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
5.1,
5.2.
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the
project.
Bo
Co
Go
The PUD Master Development Plan, (Roger L. Schutle & Associates)
RZ-65 is aa illustrative preliminary development plan. This plan is
superceded by the Site Plan Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. File No.
RZ-61A, dated August 28, 1996.
The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be.
understood as flexible so that, the final design may satisfy the project and
comply with ail applicable requirements.
All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted
to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities.
Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to staff approval.
Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure
of structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment
of buffer areas.
To protect the integrity of the Planned Unit Development, the o~ly access
road shall be the private road as shown on the Master Plan with an
exception of a service entrance off of RaRlesnake Hammock Road.
Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval, '
parts thereof may be green areas in which as much natural foliage as
practicable shall be preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green
areas, shall be of general area and configuration as shown on the Master
Plan.
(.
5.3.
5.5.
Ail requirements for wa~ and wastewater supply shall comply with the Utility
Manager Memo dated latmaty 5, 1982 which is made par~ of this document.
Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all residential
areas. All such utility lines shall be b~tall~ underground.
SOLID WAST~ DIgPOgAT.:
Such arrangements and agreements as necessary shall be made with aa approved
solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas
of the project.
EXTERNAL TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS:
A. The petitioner shall provide 17.5 feet of additional right-of-way along the
north boundary of the property for future widening ofRatdesmke Haxnmock Road.
Bo
If this project is co~~ prior to connection of St. Andrews Boulevard
to RattI~saake Hammock Road, the petitioner shall plot and construct that
portion of St. Andrews Boulevard from his project entrance to Rattlensnake
Hammock Road.
;" il~'ll! ii
1!;1fi
l
,'D
,' ' I
LIL~
PALMS IIETINIIMENT FACILITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION NO. PUD-9&-I4, ALAN D. REYNOLDS, AICP, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON
& PEEK, INC., AND GEORGE L. VARNADOE OF YOUNG, VANASSENDERP AND
VARNADOE, P.A., REPRESENTING SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING
A REZONE FROM "A" AND "A-ST" TO PUD TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND WALK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A MAXIMUM OF 2,100 DWELLING UNITS AND A
FIFTEEN (15) ACRE TOWN CENTER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF 1.75, IN
SECTIONS 33 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ?05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (COMPANION TO DRI-96-1)
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of the petition is to have certain land as herein described rezoned from "A" Rural
Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include both single
family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of ISLAND
WALK is an internal, centrally looted, interrelated recreational, open space, and community service
element, consisting ora large lake and green space network that links all residential neighborhoods via a
pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town Center will provide many retail,
recreational, and community services and facilities that support the needs of ISLAND WALK residents
and guests, including community meeting rooms, central postal facility, neighborhood retail goods and
services including a restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green space. By
including a variety of services and facilities that meet the daily needs of residents within a short walking
distance of their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of demand for automobile trips
within and beyond the community, and greater interaction and communication between residents.
Inclusion of these land uses furthers the Collier County goals of encouraging mixed uses and reducing
impacts associated with new development.
The property lies within the Urban-Mixed Use Residential designated area on the Future Land Use Map
to the FLUE to the GM~P. The density rating system applicable to land in this area authorizes a density
of four (4) dwelling units per acre. This project requests a density of three (3) dwelling units per acre.
Therefore the land use and density are consistent with the FLUE to the GMP.
Developments of this magnitude also qualify for the PUD Neighborhood Commercial Sub-district. A
fifteen (15) acre Town Center containing retail and service uses which by design will only serve project
residents is proposed consistent with the provisions authorizln~; the Neighborhood Commercial syb-
Relative to other applicable elements of the GMP the following consistency statements are made;
i n I n - Recreation space for County wide application is covered through
Recreation Impact fees which will be assessed each residential unit as it is developed.
The Collier County Land Development Code requires sixty (60) percent of the gross acreage to be set
aside as open space. The Master Plan advises that 276 acres is set aside as common ground. Nearly
forty (40) percent of the land is in common space. Typically, development parcels will contribute more
the remaining twenty (20) percent, therefore, staff feels confident that approval of' this project will be
consistent with the Recreation and Open Space element to the GMP and the provision of'the LDC.
~ - By virtue of' the fact that public water supply and wastewater collection
sysxem extending from the County's system will be developed throughout the project makes this project
consistent with the water and sewer element of.the GMP.
~ - Specific requirements are included within the PLrD document to guarantee that
goals, objectives, and policies of.the GMP will be achieved to the greatest extent possible.
rv i ! - Given that the subject property has been actively
farmed over its entirety, there are no applicable conservation issues, however, a small isolated wetland
of 1.6 acres is being preserved.
ffi ir I ti n 1 m n - Site generated trips exceed the Significance Test ($% of the Level of'
Service "C" design capacity) within the project and within the projects radius of development influence
(RDI). However, the site generated trips will not lower the level ofservlce below the adopted LOS "D"
standard for any road segment within the project's RDI.
Based on the above relationship and evaluation of' other applicable TCE policies it was concluded that
this petition if approved will be consistent with policies 1.3, $. 1, $.2, 7.2 and 7.3 of the TCE.
Staff' completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
favorable determination must be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective,
comprehensive overview of. the impacts of. the proposed land use change, be they positive or negative,
culminating in a staff recommendation based on that comprehensive overview. The listed criteria are
specifically noted in Sections 2.7.2.5 and 2.7.3.2.5 of the Land Development Code thus requiring staff
evaluation and comment, and form the basis for a recommendation of approval or denial by the Planning
Commission once approved and/or otherwise modified to the Board of.County Commissioners.
JAN ,~ 8 1997
Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the stafF review are listed under each of
the criterion noted and are categorized as either pro or cons ot not applicable, whichever the case may
be, in the opinion of staff. Staff review of each of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion
culminating in a determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These
evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff'report.
The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on December 19, 1996 and unanimously
voted to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioner's. Three persons addressed the
Commission expressing reservation. A copy of their written comments are included in this executive
FISCAL IMPACT:
This petition by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment
achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been
approved will result in a future fiscal impact on County public facilities. The County collects impact
fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on
public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element
needed to maintain adopted levels of'service for public facilities. In the event that impact fee collections
are inadequate to maintain adopted levels of'service, the County must provide supplemental funds from
other revenue sources in order to build needed facilities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
Analysis of this petition as presented and as structured by its PUD regulatory document resulted in
reaching a conclusion that its approval is consistent with the Collier County Cn'ow~h Management Plan.
Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under
the provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24 at the earliest or next to occur of
either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this
development.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and
archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no
Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
1997
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUD-96-14, as described by the Ordinance
of'Adoption and Ey. Ju'bits thereto and made a part ofthis Executive Summary submission.
·
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
AICP --'---
~.~.IRR~NT PLANNING MA~AG£R
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP DATE
T A, CAUTERO, AD'M~ISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEV, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS,
Pud-96-14 EX SUlVIMARY/pd
AGENDA ITEM\
JAN 2, 8 1997
Plo ~
I I I I
AGENDA ITEM 7-F
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
DATE:
DECEMBER 2, 1996
PETITION NO:
PUD-96-14, ISLANDWALK
(COMPANION DRI-96-10
OWNER/AGENT:
Agent:
Mr. Alan D. Reynolds, AICP
Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
Sunco Building Corporation
3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension
Naples, Florida 34199
..REQUESTED ACTION:
This peri=ion seeks to have certain land as herein described rezoned
from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road,
comprised of the entire Section 33 and a small portion of Section
34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East consisting of 705 acres which
lies one mile east of 1-75 (See location map following page).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling
units, to include both single family and multi-family structures in
a controlled access community. The focal point of ISI2%ND W;kLK is an
internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space,
and community service element, consisting of a large lake and green
space, network that links all residential neighborhoods via a
pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town
Center will provide many retail, recreational, and community
services and facilities that support the needs of ISLAND W~K
residents and guests, including community meeting room~~~
postal fazi!ity, neighborhood retail gooC.~-~~~e~clU~
AG£ND& ITEM- ~.
JAN 2 8 1997
restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green
space. By including a variety of services and facilities that meet
the daily needs of residents within a short walking distance of
their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of
demand for automobile trips within and beyond the community, and
greater interaction and communication between residents. Inclusion
of these land uses furthers the Collier County goals of encouraging
mixed uses and reducing impacts associated with new development.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Existing:
Previous and existing land uses
consist of active agricultural
fields, farming facilities, farm
workers village and a 1.6 acre
isolated wetland. Active row crop
farming occupies more than 673 acres
(95%) of the project site. The
isolated wetland system is located on
the northeast portion of the subject
property. This system is
predominantly willow with most
cypress occurring off-site. This
system has been severely disturbed by
past activities, such as farm
ditching and berms, and exotic
invasion. The property is zoned "A"
Rural Agricultural.
Surrounding: North - To the north the land is vacant and
is zoned ~A" Rural Agricultural and
PUD (Heritage Greens a
residential/golf course planned
community.
East - The land is vacant and is zoned "A"
Rural Agricultural.
South - To the south the land is bounded by
Vanderbilt Beach Road. The south side
of Vanderbilt Beach Road is zoned "E"
Estates and ~A" Rural Agricultural.
There are no residences at this time
with access to Vanderbilt Beach Road.
The Estates lots are through lots
fronting on both 7~ Avenue N.W. and
Vanderbilt Beach Road.
West - To the west lies properties within
the "Estates" zoning district.
Several parcels abutting the west
limit of the subject property are
developed~QJ~.~g~9_~:
AGEND& IIEM \
2
JAN 2 8 1997
P~..._~
GROWTH ~MENT PLAN CONSISTENCY.'
The property lies within the Urban-Mixed Use. Residential
designated area on the P~ture Land Use Map to the FLUE to the
GMP. The density rating system applicable to land in this area
authorizes a density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. This
project requests a density of three (3) dwelling units per acre.
Therefore the land use and density are consistent with the FLUE
to the ~.P.
Developments of this magnitude also qualify for the PUD
Neighborhood Commercial Sub-district. A fifteen (15) acre Town
Center containing retail and service uses which by design will
only serve project residents is proposed consistent with the
provisions authorizing the Neighborhood Commercial sub-district.
Relative to other applicable elements of the GMP the following
consis:ency statements are made;
Recrea~icn and~ - Recreation space for County wide
application is covered through Recreation Impact fees which will
be assessed each residential unit as it is developed. Under the
companfcn DRI Development Order no request was made to set aside
a portion of the subject land for County wide recreation
purposes. However, recreation space and services for use of
residents of island walk will be available from the considerable
co~on lands illustrated on the Master Plan (i.e. 103 acres).
While no~ directly illustrated a similar development by this same
developzent entity would indicate that recreation facilities will
be available for project residents.
The Collier County Land Development Code requires sixty (60)
percen~ of the gross acreage to be set aside as open space. Open
space includes water bodies and all pervious surface area, both
that which is in common land, and that on each individual
development parcel. The Master Plan advises that 276 acres is
set aside as common ground. Nearly forty (40) percent of the
land is in common space. Typically, development parcels will
contribute more the remaining twenty (20) percent, therefore,
staff feels confident that approval of this project will be
consistent with the Recreation and Open Space element to the GMP
and the provision of the LDC.
Water and Sewer Element - By virtue of the fact that public water
supply and wastewater collection system extending from the
County's system will be developed throughout the project makes
this prc~ect consistent with the water and sewer element of the
GMP.
Drainage Element - Specific requirements are included within the
PUD docv-ent to guarantee that goals objectives and policies of
the ~.? will be achieved to the greates!
extent possible
Conservation and Coastal Management Element - Given that the
subject property has been actively farmed over its entirety,
there are no applicable conservation issues, however, a small
isolated wetland of 1.6 acres is being preserved. Other
requirements for conservation contained in the LDC will be
provided for as stipulations in the PUD to the extent necessary
(i.e. preservation of natural vegetation).
Traffic Circulation Element - The applicant's Traffic Impact
Statement (TIS) and the Trip Generation Manual indicates that the
site generated traffic for this project is approximately 9,340
ADT after trip adjustments. The project buildout is proposed to
be in the year 2,002. Based on staff's analysis, the site
generated trips exceed the Si~ntficance Test (5% of the Level of
Service "C" design capacity} within the project and within the
projects radius of development influence (RDI). However, the
site generated trips will not lower the level of service below
the adopted LOS ~D" standard for any road segment within the
project's RDI. In addition, this petition is subject to the
review and stipulations of the Regional Planning Council.
The Traffic Circulation Element (TCE) lists Vanderbilt Beach Road
as a 2 lane collector road. The current traffic count for this
road west of CR-951 is 3,397 AADT which results in LOS "C". CR-
951 south of Vanderbilt Beach Road has a count of 8,338 and is
operating at LOS "C". It should be noted that CR-951 from
Immoka!ee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard is not scheduled to be
improved to 4 lanes within the next five years. Other road
improvements which will be required as development proceeds are
listed in Table 21.A-3 in the ADA. In addition, a number of
intersection improvements will be required by the time of
buildout.
Therefore, this project meets the County's concurrency
requirement and is consistent with the standards referenced in
Policy 1.3, 5.1, and 5.2 of the TCE. The layout of the
conceptual PUD Master Plan from a planning standpoint suggests
the following: The access point is only from Vanderbilt Beach
Road. No roadway interconnection to the adjacent property is
provided, however, provisions have been made to provide access to
the future extension of Logan Boulevard. In view of the clear
sight distance along this segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road, the
proposed access should operate with an acceptable level of
safety. In addition, the access point is subject to all required
R.O.W. permits and the Collier County access Management Plan.
The final access geometry and design of the traffic circulation
system will be reviewed at the time of Site Development Plan
(SDP) and/or Preliminary Subdivision Plat (PSP) review. Based on
staff's review, the conceptual traffic circulation system is
deemed consistent with Policy 7.2 and 7.3 of the TCE. The
Traffic Accident report for 1995 shows the intersection of
Vanderbi!t Beach Road and Logan Bouleva
accident rate (under 10 per year).
JAN 2, 8 1997
JAN 1
this petition if approved would be consistent with the Traffic
Circulation Element of the GMP.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is
located outside an area of historical and archaeological
probability as referenced on the official Collier County
Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey
and Assessment is required.
Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code is
during the course of site clearing, excavation or other
construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact is
found, all development within the minimum area necessary to
protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the
Collier County Compliance Service Department contacted.
EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE:
The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff
responsih!e for oversight related to the above referenced areas
of critical concern. This includes a review by tke Community
Development Environmental and Engineering staff, and the
Transportation Services Division. These reviews help shape the
content cf the PUD Document and cause Development Corunitments to
be formulated to achieve GMP and LDC requirements. Where the
petitioner determined to challenge recommended revisions these
are identified for final resolution by the Collier County
Planning Commission, and County Board of Commissioners.
No issues were raised by reviewing staff members that were not
resolved or otherwise provided for in the PUD document. The EAB
reviewed this petition relative to their jurisdictional concerns
on December 3, 1996. Their recommendations are included in the
PUD document.
ANALYSIS:
Appropriate evaluation of petitions for rezoning should establish
a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected
decision makers. The evaluation by professional staff should
typically include an analysis of the petitioner's relationship to
the community's futur6 land use plan, and whether or not a
rezoning action would be consistent with the Collier County
Growth Management Plan in ail of its related elements.
Other evaluation considerations should include an assessment of
adequacy of transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure,
and co--patibility with adjacent land uses, a consideration
usually dealt with as a fact of analyzing the relationship of the,
rezoning action to the long range P.~n~~
The most important facet of the rezoning action is that it
constitutes a legislative statement that authorizes the use of
land for a specific development strategy, provided the
development of the land can go forward. It may or may not affect
the timing of development because of subsequent permitting
requirements.
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use
petition and the criteria on which a favorable determination must
be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective,
comprehensive overview of the impacts of the proposed land use
change, be they positive or negative, culminating in a staff
recommendation based on that comprehensive overview. The listed
criteria are specifically noted in Sections 2.7.2.5 and 2.7.3.2.5
of the Land Development Code thus requiring staff evaluation and
comment, and form the basis for a recommendation of approval or
denial by the Planning Commission once approved and/or otherwise
modified to the Board of County Commissioners. Each of the
potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff
review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are
categorized as either pro or cons or not applicable, whichever
the case may be, in the opinion of staff. Staff review of each
of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion culminating
in a determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance
with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as separate
documents and are attached to the staff report.
Notwithstanding the above, staff in reviewing the determinants
for adequate findings to support a rezoning action advise as
follows:
Relat~ Future and Existin_/ Land Uses: - A discussion of
this relationship, ~ k~ ~pplies spe~-ca~i~ %0 Collier County's
legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of
the proposed zoning action to the Future Land Use Element of the
Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Ail of the property is located within the Urban Residential area
of the Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. Given the
availability of a potable water system and wastewater collection
system and the urban influence impacting this area it is timely
that this land now be.rezoned to an urban residential zoning
classification. To the west of and south of the property the
land is zoned ~'E" Estates. This land is part of the Golden Gate
Estates Subdivision. The Vineyards development lies immediately
southwest of the property. The Golden Gate Estates subdivision
are exception to urban type residential development, even though
in some areas certain parts of the Golden Gate Estates
subdivision are completely surrounded with land earmarked for
urban residential development based on the FLUE Map. This is the
case for that portion of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision that
lies between the project and 1-75.
affect the ability of adjacent lan~
JAN 8 1997
urban residential desi~llation. The residential development of
the subject property should be deemed compatible because it is
consistent with the FLUE, it is urban impacted and is capable of
being served with the County's water and sewer system. Island
Walk's design tends to isolate any potential housing from
contiguous land by virtue of its ring road design and required
perimeter landscape buffer. This enhances its compatibility with
adjacent property insofar as there are differences in density.
It should be appreciated that Heritage Greens lies north of this
project and its density is comparable to what is proposed for
Island Walk. The remaining Agricultural zoning along the north
property line will likely be rezoned at some future date to a
density equal to Island Walk and Heritage Greens, further
justifying its compatibility assessment.
Utility Infrastructure: - Both public sanitary sewers and
municipal water supplies are available to the property and will
be extended as a consequence of future platting to each lot or
tract as they are platted. ~ll development must comply with
surface water management requirements invoked at the time of
subdividing as the case will be for development of this land.
The water management system to serve the project will consist of
an interconnected lake system. Runoff from the developed areas
will be conveyed to the lakes by sheetflow, catch basins, and
culvert systems. The lakes will then discharge through control
structures into the Vanderbilt Beach right-of-way. This
discharge will be conveyed to the west by the Vanderbilt Beach
swale into the 1-75 canal and then south to the Golden Gate
canal.
Off-site flows from the north will be accommodated pursuant to
the recommendations of the Harvey Basin Master Plan. This will
be accomplished by passing runoff through or around the perimeter
of the project or a combination thereof.
Pursuant to the Island Walk PUD document, removal of fill and
rock from Island Walk can be authorized up to a maximum of
500,000 cubic yards subject to the receipt of a commercial
excavation permit. If .a commercial excavation permit is
requested, the permit can be administratively approved by the
Collier County Development Services Director or his designee.
This project will further be permitted by the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD).
CommuniTy Infrastructure and Services - Community Infrastructure
and Services available are as follows:
Fire
- South side of Immokalee Road - 2.5 road
miles, current condition, however
potentially one mile following completion
of the Logan Boulevard extension.
fire stations o Ai~~~ al
JAN 2 8 1997
Planned
will also enhance emergency response
times.
Librar_~
- The nearest public library facility is
located on Vanderbilt Beach Road near U.S.
41.
County Parks
- The Vineyards County Park is located
within one mile of Island Walk.
~Facilities - Major concentrations of shopping
facilities are located on Pine Ridge Road
at the Vineyards, Pine Ridge/Airport Roads
and Immokalee/Airport Roads. In the
future major shopping facilities nearest
the project will be at Vanderbilt Beach
Road and Airport Road.
Island Walk is unique in the sense that it
will include many convenience commercial
type services that will reduce the need
for residents to leave their homes to
fulfill every consumer requirement.
PUD Develc~-.nent Standards - Island Walk contains development
standards for various housing development strategies that depend
upon lo= s£ze and housing structure type. PUD's are generally
given considerable latitude to establish standards that are
different than conventional zoning districts. The assumption
being tha~ as long as the standards apply uniformly throughout
the PUD that persons investing in real estate know what to
expect. The standards employed by this PUD are similar to the
standards employed by many PUD's. This type of development has
produced desirable end results and they remain attractive
communities to this day. The maximum height of building is
thirty-five (35) feet for single family, two family and
townhouses, and fifty (50) feet for multiple family structures.
The placement of various housing structure types will be no doubt
guided in part by market conditions and the developers wish to
achieve all of their development rights. Given the special
development emphasis of the owner/entity, whereby they construct
all of the housing units, there should be no concern relative to
the potential to bring.about an inharmonious mixture of housing
structure types.
PUD Master Plan - It is important to recognize that provision is
being made to reserve and dedicate sufficient land for the
extension cf Logan Boulevard as required by the Traffic Ways Map
which is part of the Traffic Element of the GMP. The Logan
Boulevard extension will veer to the west at point north
_ . a of
Vanderbil~ Beach urlve so that it parallels the Section line
which is ~ypically the alignment for major intracounty roads.
Access to ~he planned Logan Boulevard ex - ' - 'sland Walk
is proposed at the south and north e'~ds ~~~ ~
are secondary access points. The main access point is from
Vanderbilt Beach Road. A collector ring road circumscribes the
project exclusive of Logan Boulevard.
No provision is made for interconnection with adjacent land.
Given the size of the planned neighborhood and the immediate
proximity of Logan Boulevard no interconnection should be
necessary for adequate intracounty travel patterns.
STAFF RECO~NDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of
Petition PUD-96-14 being a petition to rezone certain property to
the Planned Unit Development district for a project titled island
walk as described and regulated by the draft Ordinance of
Adoption and Exhibits thereto (i.e. PUD document and Master Plan.
PR PARED'B : ~
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
ROBERT ~ MULHE~, AICP
~N~D W. ARNOLD, A~CP
PLAN~ING SERVICES~P~~ DI~CTOR
~INCENT A. ~UTERO, ~-~R
CO~ITY DEV. ~D E~IRO~NT~ SVCS.
DATE
DATE
DATE
~.. ~R CO~JNTY p~ISSION:
PUD-96-1/ STAFF REPORT/md
Petition ~kn~ber: PUD-96-14
Staff Report for December 19, 1996 CCPC meeting.
NOTE: This Petition has. been advertised for the January 10, 1997
BCC meeting.
.....<.~<.'
AG£ND,) qr£.~,
JAN 2 8 1997
FI2VDi2~GS FOR PUD
PUD-96-14
Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning
Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following
criteria:
The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traf~c and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
.Pro: (i)
Intensi~ng land development patterns produces economies of scale
relative to public utilities, facilities and services, which are currently
available in this area.
(ii)
The ement that location choice is enhanced for residential environments
within the urban area reduces the push on urban sprawl.
The subject property is served by a network of arterial roads, all of
which are well within the urbanized area providing easy access to a
host of community services and facilities.
(iv)
Comprehensive muhi-disciplined analysis supports the suitability of the
land for the uses proposed.
Con:
As with ail actions that intensi~/urban development patterns there is
some loss to travel time for users of the same arterial road system.
Summary Findinz: Jurisdictional reviews by C~ounty staff support the manner and
pattern of development proposed for the subject property. Development conditions
contained in the PUD document give assurance that all infrastructure will be developed
and be consistent with .County regulations. Any inadequacies which require
supplementing the PUD document will be recommended to the Board of County
Commissioners as conditions of approval by staff. Recommended mitigation measures
will assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the Growth
Management Plan.
Adequac:,.- of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas aria i-aC~A~~ .,C ~:)1 "t'O b
or maintained at public expense, wo./~) ~~
JAN 1 997
JAN 2 8 1997
Pe. __ ~
Evaluation not applicable.
~ Documents submitted with the applica6on provide evidence of'
unified control. The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing
operation and maintenance of'common areas.
Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives
and policies of the Growth Management Plan.
Pro.__[ (ii
The development strategy for the subject property is entirely consistent
with the goals, objectives and policies of. the Growth Management
Plan.
Con'. (i) None.
objectlv~ ~d policies otlhe ~o~h Managem~t Plan, A more ~alled description of
this ~o~ty Is addressed in the StaffRepon.
~lo~g ~e l~d to be us~ for u~an residenfig pu~oses at the d~si~ propose.
~s ~fion h~ b~n r~ by the appropHate ~afffor ~mpli~ ~th the appli~[e
tltmtn~ o~tbe ~o~h M~ag~t PI~, as not~ below:
~ - Consistency with FLUE requirements is tunher described as
follows:
~ - Approv,,I would authorize twenty, one hundred (2100) dwmlllna unlt,
who~e denalty would be 3,0 dwelllna units per acre, This is ~ontlecnt with the density
rating system to the FLUE...
~I~- The. urban_relldentla] ~ubdl.~telet ellnw~ altFemttlaflfl,l, tlflJelqt~ t~am ,lift
,mm4,y muna mn areamoenna~ env]ronmem SUCh as recreat~ona~ accessory uses.
r ffi ir ! i I n - Analysis of the subject petition concluded with a finding for
consi~ency with the policies of the TCE.
·ecr 'n n I - Approximately 276 acres or 40% of the land area
,s to be developed as open space utilizing a syste ~es. ~
AGENDA I~E~/ t NO.
2 JAN £ 8 1997 997
This m'ea is exclusive of. the amount of' open space that remains as each development
pazcel or tract or lot is developed. Said amount of'open space is equal to the open space
requirement of. 60% for residential PUD's exclusive of. that open space related to actual
residential development.
Other a00licable element (s) - By virtue of. development commitments and master plan
development strategy, stalTis of the opinion that the IslandWalk PUD is entirely consistent
with provisions of'the Collier County GM~P.
Staff' review indicates that this petition has been designed to account for the necessary
relationships dictated by the GMP. Where appropriate, stipulations have been generated
to ensure consistency with the GMP during the permitting process. Therefore, this
petition has been deemed to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location o1' improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
.Pro/Con:
Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findlnt: The PUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize internal land
use relationship through the use of. various forms of' open space sep~ation. External
relationships are automatically regulated by the Land Development Code to assure
hanno~ous relationships between projects.
The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
~Pro/Con:
Evaluation not applicable.
Summar~ Findlnt: The amount ofopen space set aside by this project is greater then
the provisions of the Land Development Code.
The timing or sequence of development for the purpose o1' assuring the adequacy of
available improvements ~'nd facilities, both public and private.
.Pro/Con:
Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Finding: Timing or sequence of development in light of' concurrencT
requirements is not a significant problem. See finding No. 1, also applicable for this
finding.
3
JAN g 8 3997
AG£N~)A ~T~£1~
The ability of the subject property and or surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
~Pro/Con;
Evaluation not applicable.
~;ummar~ Finding: Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure
such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of'the propcrty
relative to hazards, and capacity of' roads, is supportive of conditions emanating fi.om
urba~ development. T~s assessment is described at length in the staff report adopted by
the CC'PC. Relative to this petition, development of' the subject property is timely,
because supporting infrastructure is available.
Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application cf'such regulations.
Pro/Con:
Evaluation not applicable.
_Summary Finding: This finding essentially requires an evnluation of the extent to which
development standards proposed for tl~s PUD depart fi.om development standards that
would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The development
standards in this PUD are similar to those standards used for panicular housing structures
and associated area requirements.
FINDINGS FOR PUD-96-14/pd
AGENDA. ITEM
,JAN g 8 1997
REZONE FIND~GS
PETITION PUD-96-14
Section 2.'/.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of'the Pl~ing Commission to the Bo~'d of County Commissioners shall show
that the Planning Com~sslon has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the
follo~,~ng, where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and Future Land Use map and the elements of the Growth Management
Plan.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summar',' FindinP. sl The proposed development is in compliance with the Future land
Use Element of the Growth Management Plan for Collier Count' and all other elements.
their objectives ~nd policies.
Coml:~nJon PUD Finding evaJuation as well as the adopted CC'PC staff' report addresses
this same ruxting.
2. The existing land use pattern;
~pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Existing: Previous and existing land uses consist of active
agricultural fields, farming facilities, farm workers village
and a 1.6 acre isolated wetland. Active row crop farming
occupies more than 673 acres (95%) of the project site.
The isolated wetland system is located on the northeast
portion of the subject property. This system is
predominantly willow with most cypress occurring off.-
site. This system has been severely disturbed by past
activities, such as farm ditching and berms, and exotic
invasion. The property is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural.
Surrounding: North- To the north the land is vacant and is zoned "A" Rural
Agricultural and PUD ('Heritage Greens a residential/golf
course planned community.
JAN 2, 8 1997
/
Fast - The land is vacant and is zoned "A' Rural Agricultural.
South - To the south the land is bounded by Yanderbih Beach
Road. The south side of. Vanderbilt Beach Road is zoned
"E" Estates and '%" Rural Agricultural. -
There are no residences at tl~s time with access to
Vanderbilt Beach Road. The Estates lots are through lots
fronting on both ?a Avenue N.W. and Vanderbilt Beach
Road.
West - To the west lies properties within the "Estates" zoning
district. Several parcels abutting the west limit of' the
subject property are developed with single family homes.
The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts:
Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findings.._ The parcel is ora sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated
distric~ urn'elated to adjacent and nearby districts because development of' the land simply
implemems a part of' the GM]) FLUE Urban Designation, an action which is ?.xpec~ed
given ~ timing is appropriate. Availability of. adequate infrastructure, nearby urban
developmcm (i.e. The Vineyards) support the timing relationship and justify the
conversioa process of'agricultural to urban residential zoning.
Whether existing district boundaries are illogically d~wn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
.Pro/Corn Evaluation not applicable.
~ummarv Findings: The district boundaries are logically drawn.
Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage o£ the proposed
amendment necessary.
.Pro/Con:_ Evaluation not applicable.
.Summary Findlni~s: The proposed zoning change is appropriate based on the existing
conditiom of the property and because its relationship to the FLUE (Future Land Use
Element of the GMS) is a positive one.
2
JAN 2 8 1997
_
e
Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood;
pro: (i)
The Countys land use policy as refleaed by the FLUE supports an action
to allow urban residential development.
(~0n: (i)
Urban Mixed-Use development may not coincide with resldent's desire to
maintain a natural atmosphere.
~;ummsr,,' Findings: The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions
in the neighborhood because the recommended development standards and other
conditions for approval have been promulgated and designed to ensure the least amount of
adverse impact on adjacent and nearby developments.
Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create t.~pes of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of
peak volumes or projected ~jpes of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases ot' the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
IF'to:
Development of the subject property is consistent with provisions or' the
Traffic Element of the GMP, therefore traffic intensity should not adversely
affect the comf'ott and safety or'existing users on adjacent public roads.
('fl) Urban intensLflcation is cost effective.
The goal of establishing a more traditional neighborhood with its own
convenience services and recreational facilities should constitute a public
benefit by discouraging external trips and therefore conserving highway
capacity.
(~on: 0)
As urban intensification increases, there is some loss of corel'orr and east of
travel to the motoring public. However, by law this degree ot'discomt'on is
regulated by. concurrency requirements.
Summary Findings; Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for
consis'ze~x:y with Policy 5.1 of the Traffic Element of the GMP and was found consistent,
a statemeaz advising that this project when developed will not excessively increase traffic
congestion Additionally certain traffic management system improvements are required as
a conclkion of approval (i.e. mm lanes, traffic signals, dedications, etc.).
analysis all projects are subject to the Concurren ,y ~,n%c, errtent system.
[ AGENDb ITEM. ~
JAN 8 1997
3
In the final
1,
Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
fro: O)
Road improvements precipitated by tl~s development and water
management improvements to accommodate site development are designed
to accommodate the normal drainage requirement.
. 0n: O)
Urban intensification potentially can heighten the occasion for area-wide
flooding under the more severe ~nfa]l event.
~;ummar~ Findin~sl Every project approved in Collier County involving the utiliza6on
of land for some land use actMty is scrutinized and required to ~tigate all sub-surface
drainage generated by deveTopmenta] actMties as a condition or approval. The water
management system to serve the project will consist of an interconnected lake system.
Runoff fi.om the developed areas will be conveyed to the lakes by sheetflow, catch basins,
and culvert systems. T~e lakes will then discharge through control structures into the
Vanderb~t Beach right-of.way. This discharge will be conveyed to the west by the
Vanderb~t Beach swale into the 1-75 canal and then south to the Golden Gate canal
The proposed discharge fi.om the site will be 38.6 cf.s at a rate 0£0.06 ct's/acre.
Offsite flows fi.om the north will be accommodated pursuant to the recommendations of
the ~ Basin Master Plan. This will be accomplished by passing runoff through or
around the perimeter of' the project or a combination thereof'. The details of the best
de.~gn are being developed at this time. Tl~s project was reviewed for dr~nage
relatio~ and design and construction plans are required to meet County stancL~rds as a
condi6on of approval. In the event area wide defidendes develop, wl~ch dc~c~enc~es
would be further exacerbated by developing vacant land, the County is required to rea~
throu~ ks Concun-ency Management system.
Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
Pro/Con:_ Evaluation not applicable.
.Summa~ FindlnRs: All' projects in Collier County are subject to the development
standards that are unique to the zoning distr~ct in which it is located. These developmcnt
standards and others apply generally and equally to all zoning distrkts (i.e. open space
requiremenL corridor m~nagement provisions, etc.) were designed to ensure that
penetragon and circulation of.a~r does not adversely affect adjacent areas.
I0.
11.
12.
Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
are. a;
Pro'. (i) Urban intensification typically ino'eases the value of adjacent or
underutilized land.
Development standards often do not reflect the quality of the project when
it actually develops. More often than not developers have structured
standards below the actual market response in order to be on the sate side.
Con.' O)
There is no way to guarantee that this project will be marketed in a manner
comparable or complimentary to development in the nearby environs.
~Summarv~ This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results
which may. be internal or external to the subject property that can affect property values.
Property v~uation is s.fl'ected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning by
itself may or may not mq'ect values, since value determination by law is driven by market
value. The mere fact that a property is given a new zoning designation may or may not
affect vaJue.
Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
P~/Coa.- Evaluation not applicable.
umm~~ The basic premise underlying ail of the development standards in
the z. oni~ division of the Land Development Code is that their sound application when
combined with the administrative site development plan approval process, gives
reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in a deterrence to
improvemem or development o£adjacent property.
Whether the proposed change w~ constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findlng2~ The proposed development complies with the Oro~h management
Pi;ut, a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with
raid Comprehensive PIan. In light of this fact the proposed change does not constitute a
grant of'special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public
welfare rebdonship because actions consistent with lan~ in the public interest.
13.
Whether there are substantial rcasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning;
pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summar~ Findln~s; The subject property is zoned Rural Agriculture "A". To deny this
petition would deprive the owner ofany reasonable use of'the property consistent with the
G~,~.
14.
Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the Cou n~-; '
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findings: The proposed development complies with the Growth Management
Pla~, a pokey statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses
deemed to be acceptable for this site.
15.
Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findings: This site is zoned "A" Rural Agriculture. W~ether or not there are
o~er si~y zoned residential areas is irrelevant.
16.
The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findings: Thc site will be altered to the ex'tent necessary to execute thc
development strategy.
17.
The impac! of'development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
Pro/Con:
Evaluation not applicable.
6
dAN £ ,
Summar~ ]~ndin~s: St~ft'rev~ews for adequacy ofpubEc services and levels of set, ce
determined that required in.rrastructure meets with GMP established rdationsh~ps.
NOTE:
GMP as used here~n means the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
FLUE means the Furore Land Use Element ofthe GMP.
I~.ZONE FINDINGS PUD-96-14/pd
December 18, 1996
Collier County Planning Commission
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Dear Commission Members:
As a property owner which directly adjoins the proposed Island Walk PUD, I have many
concerns regarding the proposed project. In lieu of representing myself as an hysterical
property owner, I have reached to individuals that are professionals in the field to assist
me in presenting my concerns.
Although John Bolt of Storm Water Management may disagree, you must first be brought
up to date on easement improvements which are currently taking place on the 30 feet
drainage easement which adjoins both my property and the proposed Island Walk
property.
As you will see with miscellaneous correspondence that has been attached, the County
has represented this drainage improvement as "existing ditch maintenance." I met with
Mr. Clayton Miller on site of this project this morning and we walked the entire project
together. Neither myself nor Mr. Miller ever discovered any sign within the 9,000 feet
project of an existing ditch measuring 2 feet in depth, with a 4 feet width and an eight feet
height. It is apparent, and yet to be verified that Collier County represented the ditch
which presently exists on the Harvey Brother Farm property. South Florida Water
Management is reviewing the on going project for possible misrepresentation and/or
exemption due to the size ofthe project. I have been assured that a written response will
be forth coming from South Florida Water Management which will be available for the
hearing before the Board Of C.ounty Commissioners. Had this been permitted with an
Environmental Review, this report could have impact on the existing Site proposal. We
do have, environmentaIly and habitat sensitive forested edge to the westerly boundary of
the proposed Island Walk.
approximately 6+ acres of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel
Brothers Farm. In addition to this loss the removal o
' on the westerly boundary ofthe Farm will again rem
As you will see by the correspondence that has been included ~om Klm Dryden of
Florida Game and Fish as well as Mr. Gary Beardsley of Tropical Environmental
Consultants, the Coufity through the drainage improvement efforts has destroyed
s under
the recommendation of both Florida Game and Fish and Gray Beardsley, that any
remaining native vegetation on the existing dirt burro be preserved and that native Florida
plants replace the Brazilian Pepper that is presently in existence.
As you see by the enclosed Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat Plan which has been
f'malized by Pelican Strand, construction activity is prohibited within I00 feet of an active
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nest, and native vegetation is to be preserved.
Given the existing Site Plan, a 20 feet buffer is proposed and then the 30 feet easement
for the future Logan Boulevard. As is recommended in the report from Gary Beardley, a
100 feet buffer from Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nests is again reiterated in the
Construction Requirements within the Pelican Strand Management Plan. Kim Dryden
has indicated in her correspondence that the 20 feet proposed Buffer has little to no value
in the protection of habitat. Given the guidelines that are documented in Plans
throughout 12 Developmenm within Collier County, the Site Plan needs to allow for a t
least a 100 feet Buffer within the existing native vegetation and forested edge to assure
the future protection of active nests against disturbance oftrafHc and development.
In speaking with Dr. Stephen Humphries at the University in Gainesville and the
Graduate Student that is presently documenting Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat on the
Hole In The Wall, Royal Poinciana and Wilderness Golf Courses, we may not be able to
maintain the existing BCFS Colony within Units 96 and 97 because of the surrounding
proposed developments. But to put it in their words, and in full agreement, it is dei'mitely
worth a shot!
In addition, the presence of Deer, Bobcat and Fox in our area raises another concern. The
Site proposal has eliminated any future corridor for the movement of wildlife.
This Site Plan, if accepted, will be close the corridor between Unit 96 and Unit 95
(which border the Vineyards to the East) which presently allows wildlife to cross
Vanderbilt Beach extension and to continue moving within protective cover.
In addition, with the recent loss of the forested buffer for the installation of the drainage
ditch, with the proposed Logan Boulevard ex'tension, you have just placed a sense of
condemnation on the property owners that adjoin the development. The setback
requirements under the Estates.District is 10% ofthe lot width or 15 feet, whichever is
less. Please be advised that in'some existing situations, you will be placing residential
improvements within 65 feet of the proposed Logan Boulevard. Let it also be known that
b)' the proposals within this PUD/DRI and the defining of this Easement of the proposed
Logan Boulevard, you have now placed properly owners in the legal position of
disclosure of this proposal on the future sale on their property. In speaking with Collier
County Roads, the proposal to extend Logan Boulevard is not on the five year plan So
therefore, I am disclosing an "unknown" for at/east five years.
As a real estate sale professional in Florida, I have
to assist in estimating of just how much value I a~
reaci'~lq~i} axtm ~,
JAN 8 1997
proposed Site Plan. We are taking into consideration the recent easement improvements.
the 20 feet buffer and the proposed Logan Boulevard extension or the legal need to
disclose the same. Don Johnson has as~tred me that there is ~'tff/icient historical data to
accomplish this task. I am also advising those neighbors whereby their improved
structures will be within 65 feet of the proposed Logan to have the same Appraisal
review completed. The Site Plan is impacting my values less than most as I chose to
build my main residence to the West ofmy 4.67 acre Tract. My own appraisal will not be
an accurate estimation in comparisons to others property owners.
If Logan Boulevard is no longer being considered by the County, then an official letter
from the Collier County Government needs to be isled to ALL
road improvement is not going to happen to eliminate the legal need of disclosure. I have
enclosed a letter from Attorney John White which addresses the issue ofdisclosure based
upon the present Site Plan.
In addition, a copy of the PUD/DRI Maps which indicate future Logan Boulevard
through to the County Line have been forwarded to the Homeowner Associafion.n of Long
north/south corridor, I think their input at the Count}, Commission Meeting for approva]
of this development is also warranted.
The last issue that I would like to bring to you attention is road impact. It is proposing
that a traffic light is to be installed at the south entrance to Oakes Boulevard offof
Vanderbilt Beach Extension. The present speed limit on Oakes Boulevard, a corridor
which runs north and south in a residential neighborhood, is at present 45 MPH. This is
the same speed limit that is on Immokalee Road! If you are considering this travel speed
in any traffic assessment, you need to be informed that it is the intention of the
Homeowners within Units 96 and 97 to petition the County to reduce this speed limit to a
minimum of 30 MPH. Orange Blossom which connects Airport Pulling to Goodlette-
Frank Road is no different than Oakes Boulevard. The speed limit on that artery is
30MPH.
5630 16~' Avenue, NW
Naples, Florida 34119
(941) 591-2922
JAN 8 1997
COLLtR COUNTY
~UBLIC WORKS DI~,qSION
May 8, 1996
Dear Collier COunty Property Owner:
3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 33962
(941) 732.2575
FAX (941) 732.2526
A CEAT~FI -F.D BLUE C1 lip
On behalf of the Collier County Stormwater Management
Department, please be advised that drainage improvements are
scheduled in your area. All construction will take place within
the Collier County 30 feet drainage easement along the east edge
of Golden Gate Estates Units 96 and 97. The improvements will
include clearing the easement and constructing a shallow
conveyance ditch to the south connecting to the Vanderbilt Beach
Road canal. This project is being undertaken as a result of the
flooding your area experience in past years, especially during
1995. By providing a positive outfall route for excess runoff,
· this project should improve the area's, drainage capabilities
although it is not a sure-fix. ~
Thank you in advance for your patience as we undertake these
improvements. If you have any tfuestions please feel free to
call this office at (941) 732-2501 or the Engineering
Consultant, Richard McCormick, P.E., of Wilkison & Associates,
Inc., at (941)643-2404.
Very truly yours,
John H. Boldt, P.E.,P.L.S.
Stormwater Management Director
JHB/mts
cc: Thomas E. Conrecode, P.E., Publio Works Administrator
George F. Archibald, P.E., Transportation Department Director
Richard McCormick, P.E., Wilkison & Associates, Inc.
Doc: 10107
JAN 8 1997
CON 24.06
:,ECEIYED
r"'3JECT REVIEW SER¥lC
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Margaret Bishop, Supervh~i Professional. Fort Myers Service Center,
Field Engineering Division, Reguhdoa Department
,,~lerry Kurtz, Area Engineer, Collier County, Field Eng/neer/ng Division,
Regulado, Depmment
DATE: Janu~y 8, 1996
SUBJECT: Ex/sting Ditch Maintenance
Bast of Oa~ Boulevard
Coil/er County
S~cdor, s 29 & 32/'TownsMp 48/Range 26
;
Collier Coun,D' Staff reques:ed our ~d~tance in evaluat/on oE a proposed ex/sthag
ditch clea=/n~ acdv/:y. The ditch is loc~ted appro~m~tely one (1) tm'le east of
Boulevard al~ng the e~st boundary of ~ect/ons 29 and 32. The' le~ltxh is app. rox/m_ate!y t~o
(:2) m/les. The site was inspected on October 12. 199-~. The ditch is approx/mately two (:l)
to three (3) feet deep w/th a four (4) foot bottom width and an eight (8) foot top width.
Vegetation/:row~h in the dltch is significant, condsting rn~l~ly of B~n'!ian Pepper.
Th/s proposed clkch mz/menance will help relieve some street and yard flooding east of
Oaks Boulevard. The ditch is located taa ¢,unty drahage easement. By copy of this
memo to Coll/er Coun~ Compl/anc¢ Services. I/eld Engineering acknowledges
upcom/ng ditch cleaning. ,
OK
Attached: SFWMD Ditch Clennlng and Ma/menance Suggest/om
Clyde Fu§ate, Collier2-Coun~ -C. ompl/ance.Serv/ces
Start Chryanowskl, Coil/er County Pla~ Rev/ew
F.E. File, Naples
JAN 2 8 1997
chat routine ditch eXe~ acc~y~C~at, ~efs Tt~ carefully portend,
~d the Florida ~caca
Xn cues v~era Cbt clsanAuZ or Raincemance of nnperm~ttad ditches or mealee
b ~a~airad, the
the act~ ~le~iRg/u~te~uca aa:ivi~y. .~so, prior to ~tht~=g such
Contact, it uo~ly seres ~,~OUt's best A~terests i~ you have fva~abXe
h dAt~ to be ~md. ~ n n
the mint n~ for ~m~ these ~m.)
it. Either a vewba~ ac~ledle~ut of the -pc~nS alou~l ~1~ ~ live~
o~ ~u~cher ~omcio= ~uld be requested, L? =,cessa~, co clari~y the ~ull
.c~, o~ th, proposed
The folloving guidelin!s should ~lvays be folloved regarding all
cliaming/taintena~ce operaclous:
1. Kt~ntaxt~ae/c~czvation must be ~u~ted to the r~mova~ of ~tSttar~ou
p~C rooC zone.
Ditch cleAui~ spoils or debris m~c be disposed of ~u each ·
water in the area.
PLQBLIC WOEK$ DIVI!I~4 Fax:g417:J.z2526 Dec 15 '96 8:5! P. 0'5/05
PAGE 2
~chln ~Iovable bounds or rtlk b$~ c/Cad by the D~m~. , .
Section. Zf cica~ for a '$urfa-e' ..... - ---. ..... ~cC I ~nforc~.nc
-ar-- - . . b wa~er ~g~n~ ViOAa~iOU, ~he respo~ible
p cy uy ~e rtq~rec ~o pay an applicable cLv~ pe~, ~es~igacive cosc~
~/or lcCo~eya ~ees.
required or ncc. T? . ...... , .... F ~lC~cc e~cI era
a~ vi ~1 do eve~ch~= ...... --- _~7cb~ff pleat contact us ~trsc
-/ · p~aW~aAe CO ~XC~y r~l~ your mplc~f/c
b~ D~ocr~cc X~.. ~d ie~lac~on,, ~ ~ pa~ t~c b Pe~mw~ble
you need Co kno~ more, have an~ questions, or ~f you wish
~ch us, please contact any of the District s fLeld Engineer/ag
~ta %nginetrs or FieLd Represeucaclves ret
where Cbt proposed work is in- ts -~ ..... ~ .... ~f~r the %eograph~c areq
AGEND~I~U ~ ~
I · ~ V~LKI$ON &
P. 2
D~e: D~ccmber 3, 1996
Ozkes DrlLuxge Ditch ·
Project Summary and Backrround
your requcsL a projea ftunmar~ for ~ ~ove referenced project is provided. The
Oakes ~c ditch preJecx h~cludes the conm~'tfon ofa ~,250 fl, km~ swde to collect
~,,,~ff from duc eastern area of Oolden O~e Bsu~es Umks 1~o. 96 and 97, m~d to convey
fbi, ~oft'to th~ Vaadcrb~ Be~ch Road csml. It is om' umie~_~,~[-g that tt~ area has
a~on~ loth - 2~h Avenues h~ · dr~eway culve~ w'J~ch ~J ~1o1~ to the e~. ]~ccau~
CoD/er ¢oun~ h~ ~ n~b~a the dhch h ~ ~0 foo~ ~c ~ ~c ~ff
~w~menm. h Feb~ 1~6, W~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~
~e do~ ~ ~ to~~ ~ ~n ~~ ~& ~ ~y ~
T~ Co~ier County Stomwater Manag~ DcpartmenI reznain~l proaa~ ~n efforts to
keep the cornmunky informed of the proposed h~:~ro~ts. W3c~. assisted Colder
County wi:h the notification to adjacent property owners regarding the project scope and
schedule (letter altached). W&A mc~iv~ two telephone calls h support of the project
and none in opposition. In addition, two landowners were ~owed time to receive tlzir
necessary right-of-way permit, So thc County could ks:lud¢ the culvert com-tmctbn ~ thc
Oak, ch-~i,~ge dr:ch project.
3506 EXCHANGE AV~., NAPLES, FL 34104 941-64
DAVID S WIL~$ON, ~E. JAMF~ N. ~gl. lO:
Dece:~bet 3, I996
]Vt. Mc.NT~I1
?~e :2 oi':2
~ clei~:h or'the :proposed s~vale ~ ~ fi'om ~o to two ~
22n~ Av~ ~ to V~ B~ ~' A ~vel~y ~ ~ ~a~ for ~o~
~e ~~ ~ ~ work ~ to ~ ~ ~c ~ ~t
~ e~~ ~ ~ ~ not ~ To ~
· e d~i~ p~ ~ ~r ~ ~n of ~t f~ g ~ ~ch o~- ~ ~o~
JAN 2 8 1997 dA, 99
t2/e~/l~$6 e~:3.5 lCJ43.26:3007? TRi~ICAL ENVZR C PAGE: 0.1,
Gary and Cathy Graves
5630 16th Avenue NW
Naples, Florida 34119
TROPICAL ENVIRON~tENTAL
CONSLTLTANTS
2396 13th Street, North
Phone 6,. Fax (813) 263-00??
December 5, 1996
RE:
Preliminary Analysis/Evaluation of habitat alterations, those
now occurring (the drainage easement) and those proposed (ag
lands adjacent to the east, 'DeVosta" proposal) relative to
wildlife usage.
Dear Cathy and Gary,
Per our discussions on the phone, our on site meeting with you November
26, 1996 and my review of relevant Tropical Environmental Consultants
office file documents please find my environmental evaluation.
I will first address the 30 foot wide drainage easement (Right-of-way)
recently cleared along your eastern property boundary.
My review of the 1990 Collier County Soil Survey Indicates that hydric
soils are present within a majority of the entire length of the drainage R.
O. W. for at least two miles.
As we discussed in the field thls condition In and of itself does not mean
that regulatory agencies would assert wetland jurisdiction. Two other
characteristics must also occur, i. e., wetland vegetation and sufficient
hydroperiod before the three tests are met.
! would, however, recommend you inquire at the county if a wetland
determination was undertaken and what the agency (South Florida Water
Management District-SFWMD and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-USACOE)
determined.
What is evident to me was the lack of ,n~tal,
page llof 5 --
j~ 1997--...
12106/1.~:-~ 00:15 1.~.;1~,~38077 TROPI:CAL ~,IVI:R C Pt.~G;' 02
( TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
· CONSULTANTS
2~6 l.~th Street, North
~one & Fax (513) 26J~77
containment fence, along the western edge of ~e R. O. W. This ~ required
by the county itself for two reasons: 1) to prevent soil/silt/fines ~om
entering wetlands and open water such as ~nals, 2) to cloady delineate
the limits of clearin~ and thus protect native vegetation outside of the
county drainage easement ~om ~mage installation of this de~ce Is a
start<etd proceedure and considered a Be~ Management Pm~lce (BMP's)
for land alterations dudng construction. Surpd~d the county does not
follow its own requirements.
Your observations that the Big Cypress Fox squirrel commonly forages and
dwells in your yard and general vlcinity was verified as we saw several
behind your residence and up on the roof. Obviously necessary life history
requlrements of this species are being provided in Unit 97 and most
shuridly along the entire ag land forested edge.
A detailed survey must be conducted to evaluate where denlng/nestlng
sites exist as the Florida Game and Fish Commission legally can only
protect the nest sites. This is required before land alterations can begin.
Of special concern to me was did the county conduct such a survey before
the clearing of the R. O. W. was begun? The stand of melaleuca trees
present behind your office and residence would be prime habitat for
squirrel nests. The Big Cypress Fox squirrel seems to prefer constructing
nests within the dense canopy of melaleuca found within altered wetlands.
Destruction of these without proper review and permitting by the FL. G. &
F C would be a clear violation of Florida law. A portion of the cypress,
melaleuca and slash pine stand clearly was present within the R. O. W.
along your property.
! would recommend that you confer with county staff to determine if this
survey was conducted and what were the findings.
page 2 o
AG£ND& II:EM
,JAN £ 8 1997
AGENDA ITEM,.
. TROPICAL ENVIRONM~-NTAL
CONSULTANTS
2396 13~h Street, No~h
N.?Irs, Flortcla 33940
Phone & Fax (813) 26.t.¢077
Edges between differing landscape vegetational feature (ecotones) are
very rich and diverse when considering the variety and numbers of plant
and animal species. This biodiverslty is possible because the habitat
provides essential needs of a variety of species such as the Big Cypress
Fox squirrel and the Bob cat. Note, scat was noted within the cleared R. O.
W.
This edge, along the Estates lots from Vanderbilt Road to Immockalee,
also provides a forested corridor which facilitates movement of wildlife
over larger distances.
Some comments relative to the proposed land alterations wtthin the ag
fields adjacent and to the east of you.
My first concern, now that the 30' drainage R. O. W. has been cleared, is
the potential loss of additional forested edge which presently exists on or
along the ag perimeter spoil berm.
Prior to the clearing of the R. O. W. the edge of the farm fields, Just at the
perimeter spoil mound, functioned as the ecotonal edge community.
If the ag property also has a 30' drainage easement, one contiguous with
your 30' easement, then it too might be cleared. The entire berm and
associated ag ditch would be eliminated and in it place would be a 60'
drainage easement, completely devoid of mature native trees.
This would further degrade the functional aspects of the occupied range-of
the bob cat and the El. C. fox squirrel as well as other wildlife.
One requirement of larger developments, such as the one being proposed by
Mr. DeVosta, is that a perimeter berm be installed to insure storm water
runoff is held within the development. This new berm would be
constructed interior to the 60' drainage R. O. W. further eliminating
forested corridors for wildlife movement.
page 3 of
AGENDA LTEM \
s
JAN ~ 8 1997
TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
· CONSULTANTS
2.~96 13th Str~t
Phone & F=x (813) 2634077
County planning staff, as recently as two weeks ago, expressed concern by
the new type of development being designed which offer little native
vegetated buffers but instead consist of a repeating finger lake and fill
complex, one which ~double loads" housing along access roads.
Environmentally, functionally, these designs preserve little to no forested
areas especially if slated for already cleared active ag areas such as that
to the east of you.
As you know the county Land Development code Regulations require
preservation of a percentage of native habitat when present. Development
in previous active ag areas do not have to preserve native habitat if none
existed.
The Collier staff professional planners believe that these types of
development desfgns could be more environmentally and esthettcaIiy
pleasing, if required to recreate masses of native vegetation, such as
adequate and functional perimeter buffers. I concur with :hat evaluation.
Specific efforts are being proposed through the 'South Florida Water
Management District's Envfronmental Advisory Committee to request tht
the District evaluate the effectiveness of buffer requirements on water
quality and wildlife values. The scientific literature clearly suggests
that buffers of 100+ I~eet are necessar~ to preserve wildlife values and
maintian biodiversity.
No one in the field of ecology/wildlife management would disagree that
the fragmentation of the landscape by agricultural practices and urban
development is a threat to 'wildlife and biodiversity. They also agree that
there are designs which if incorporated into both land uses would enhance
the value to wildlife, especially if the more Intense landscape altering
land use is adjacent to larger Intact habitat systems, L e., rural estates
type mosaic where the majority of the naUve vegetation is retained.
page 4 ol
JAN 2 8 1997
~' TROPICAL ~qVIRONMENTAL
~ J~L [J CONSULTAI~T..TS
Ph~e ~ F,~ (813) 263-~7
There ~re Best M~n~gement Pr~ices (BMP's) which, il ~pp~ed to ~e
DeVost~ ~nd ~rleton Lakes style design ~t, would enhance, ~ugment,
~lre~dy existing h~blt~t ~ncflons provided ~long ~he estates unlts-~g
fields inte~ce. ~e cre~tlon al ~ forested buffer ~long the edges,
e~ecimlty ~en ~ more Intense l~nd ~e is ~oposed on one side, e. g., ~e
~rm fields multJf~mJly units ~dj~cent to the single ~mJly estates
zoning, would ~ssJst both developments to bddge the ~mns~tJon between
them ~s well as provide corridor edge h~blt~t for wildlife.
in conclusion your statement that the creation of finger lakes would
involve blasting to fracture the subsurface rock and facilitate the
excavation process has the potential to alter ground water hydrology and
recharge characteristics, especlalJy in adjacent wetlands due to the
potential of Karst conditions in southwest Florida. Fractures could alter
near surface marl/clay layers allowing summer rains to more quickly
penetrate downward reducing the hydropertod of affected wetlands. This
and formation of sink holes were a serious problem when the Lee County
Regional (now International) airport was constructed.
My report Is general in coverage, however additional field Investigation
and review of county records and permit applications would alJow a more
accurate evaluation of environmental issues raised.
Thank you for allowing Tropical Environmental Consultants to assist your
Information gathering process. If we can assist your effort further please
give a call.
Gary Lee 8eardsley - ~[
Biologist/Consultant
copy: Commission Tim Constantine Collier County E A B
Klm Dryden-F G & F Commission
South Florida Water Management District-Fort
The Conservancy of SW Florida
Myers
AG£ND~ 17~ ~,
JAN 2 8 1997
FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION --~.=:-"
IL'~IE K..MO~U~J$ QUL~'TON L. N£DGE~-~'H. DDS MRS. GILBERT 4: H~'.~PHR.EY THOMAS B. I~IBLER JOE BRL.'~'ER
S &'",.sot~ .Mi&~ ~Gccos,.I,~ Lakeland Desert
ALLAN L. EGBERT. Ph.D..
V~CTOR J. H~LLER.
Ms. Cathy Graves
5630 16th Avenue,
Naples, FL 34119
Office of Environnental
Sez~lces
29200 Tuckers Grade
l~nta Garda, FL 33955
December 11, 1996
Big C~press Fox Squirrel
Habitat, Oakes Boulevard Area,
Island Walk DR!
Dear Ms. Graves:
This is in response to your letter dated November 26 regarding potential
impacts to the Big Cypress fox squirrel, a state-threatened species, and other
non-listed wildlife, as a result of the development of the referenced Island
Walk Development of Regional Iupact.(DRI). Your letter indicates Chat Collier
County also cleared a drainage easement adjacent to your property, possibly in
conjunction with the proposed development. You requested information as to
whether the Game and Fresh Water Fish Comsission (CFC) vas contacted with
regard to the clearing on the drainage easement, which apparently vas
vegetated with pine, Melaleuca, and brazilian pepper. You also asked for
information on habitat management practices for fox squirrels.
! can confirm that the area in which you live does have · significant
fox squirrel population. Fox squirrels in Collier County are dependent on
slash pine, bald cypress, cabbage paIm for forage and nestin& (sometimes in
bromeliads on the trees). However, Big Cypress fox squirrels in Southwest
Florida do use exotic vegetation, particularly Melaleuca, for nesting. This
is not to condone the preservation of Melaleuca, which has very detrimental
impacts on fox squirrel habitat as a whole, but is a statement of fact. We
regularly coordinate with cpnsultants, developers, and Collier County staff to
assure that forested areas; including Melaleuca-invaded habitats, are checked
for the presence of active nests prior to clearing activities. In this case,
we were not contacted regarding the easement habitat clearing.
As discussed with you, we did not review the referenced DRI because of
our workload and the fact that the site vas primarily a cleared farm field.
There is, of course, a big difference in wildlife use between even an active
farm field and a development site. I concur with you Chat the development of
the site has potential to impact fox squirrel populations and that better
planning of the site could benefit fox squirr,~ls and other wild,ire in your
subdivision. I have the following recommendal
JAN 2 8 1997
.FISI~I .~, ~/~'ILDLI
1943 - 1993
50 YEARS AS STEV,~RD OF FLORIDA',
Es'. Cathy Craves
December 11, 1996
Page 2
fox squirrels and development sites in Southwest Florida:
1) Fox squirrels (bobcats, foxes, etc) are particularly vulnerable to
roadklll as they spend much of ~heir tine on ~ha ground (very different from
gray squirrels). I have retrieved fox squirrel roadkllls from all over
western Collier Cotm~y. The proposed DRI plan you provided shove Logan
Boulevard extension as being constructed adjacent to your proper~y. Hoving
the roadway further to the east, away from ~he forested Estates0 would reduce
~he potential for roadklll. Fox squirrels viii cross large open areas in
search of food resources and have large hone ranges, so toying ~he road will
not totally eliminate roadkill, especially since ~his road nay become a
north/south corridor into Lee Coufl~ (we have recommended ~he Logan Boulevard
alignnent over the S.R. 951 aligrunent because of impacts to regional wildlife
resources). ..*
2) Any existingnative fox squirrel habitat (forest), particularly
sl&sh pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, should be preserved. Although we
recommend the removal of exotics such as Helaleuca, no removal should occur
before trees ere checked (by a qualified biologist) for active fox squirrel
nests. On most development sites, we recommend re-planting areas where
exotics have been removed with native trees.
3) A habitat buffer to intensive development, along vl~h any reduction
in residential density chat would allow more habitat preservation/restoration,
is beneficial to wildlife, including fox squirrels. Hlxed-use development
causes the disturbances to native wildlife, including problems associated with
pets (predation, disturbance), light and noise (deters some habitat use by
some species), nuisance animal complaints (animals such as bobcats or bats
killed or removed because of real or perceived ~hreat), roadkill ('slow'
speed~ rarely eliminate the problem), herbicide/pesticide (including sosquito
spraying) application (kills non-target species), and proliferation of 'common
species" such as raccoons, pigeons, mockingbirds, and arnadillos, that compete
with other more habitat sensitive wildlife species. The proliferation of
common or nuisance animals on development sites can affect ~he quallL~ of
adjacent wildlife communities, including some of the bird species you
mentioned in your letter. The buffer should be as big as possible (usually
economics are the determining factor). The proposed 20-fl buffer you
mentioned has very little value.
Please call me at (9~1) 575-5765 if you have any questions.
~/~d
KNV 1-11-2
cc: Collier Co. Development Services
Sincerely,
Kinberly A. Dryden
Biological Scientist IV
JAN g 8 1997
BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL
HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
PELICAN STRAND
Prepared For
Pelican Strand, Ltd.
10100 Valewood Drive
Naples, FL 33999
Prepared l~y
Boylan ~
Environm: i&
Consultants, ac.
ieetland & ~Idlife Surve~nmentaI
Permtmn$.
Impact ~Je. tlrnent~
102.ti Metro Pa~wav Suite 20:~. Fort Myers. Florida.
Phon~: ¢gaD 418-0671
Fax: ~gal} ~18-067:~
November 4, 1996
AGENDA.~
FI.
Approximately 12.96 acres of pine flatwoods will be created adjacent to the golf course in the northern
area of the site. The approximate locations of these areas are shown in the aRached preservation plan.
Once construction is completed these areas will be re vegetated with species native to pine fiarwoods.
The tree density will be based on 25 foot centers and the shrub plantings based on 20 foot centers. The
plantings will be clustered to mimic natural communities. The following is a list of potential species
to be planted:
Trees
Pinus elliottii
Quercus virginiana
Sabal palmetto
Strangler Fig
Persea spp.
Mid story
Ilex cassine
lle~c gtabra
Myrica cerifera
Serenoa repens
Befaria racemosa
Lyonia ferruginea
The specific species planted will depend on the site conditions when the construction is completed and
the market availability of the various plant material. No exotic palms or trees will be substituted for
native plants. The majority of the tree plantings, approximately 80 percent will consist of slash pine.
Construct/on Details
Immediately prior to initiation of construction on any phase of development, the areas will be checked
for the presence of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests. If active nests are found, buffers will be
maintained around the nest trees until the nests are deemed inactive. The buffers are anticipated to be
around 100 feet in width. Any deviations from this dimension will be presented to the FGFWFC for
review and approval, prior to implementation. Before implementation of the restoration work, the
limits of any native vegetation, especially mature slash pine, will be marked in the field and the areas
barricaded to maintain this vegetation intact
Most of the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be placed under a Conservation Easement to Collier
County or the SFWMD. A copy of this plan will be an attachment to the easement. The exceptions to
this are the areas immediately adjacent to the golf course areas. These areas will be within designated
common area and signage will be posted alerting pedestrians of the preservation status of these areas.
Ail Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be subject to a long term maintenance program.
7
JAN 8 199Z
Existing Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nest Adjoining
Drainage Easement Improvements.
Ho. ~
JAN
'Big Cypress Fox Squirrels That Currently Exist On My
Adjoining Property.
N g 8 1¢97
BRIM~EK~Hp FLORID~ TEL:941-565-2705.
Dec 17 96
I0:27 No.O01P.01
17 December 1996
Collier County Government
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples 1ri, 34104
Attention: County Current Planning Section
Mr Ronald Nino
Re: Island Walk PUD-96-J4 & D1~.96-1
Dear Mr Nlno:
I am quite concerned about the extension of Logan Boulevard
which is being proposed in connection with the above meca.
subdivision. Is it intended that the streets of Units 96 and 97
which run east of Oakes Boulevard will now connect to this
proposed extension of Logan Boulevard?
Without getting in~o the discussion of'the need for yet another
meca-subdivision tn Col!ier County, I[ nm quite sure there are
very few residents of Umts 96 and 97 who would like to see
their streets become through streets. If the developer would
like to extend Logan Boulevards why cnn he not include the
20 foot landscape buffer the entire length of the proposed
extension?
I hope you will consider this when you make your dec~sion
regarding this project.
mekamp
5891 14th Avenue NM/
Haples FL 34119-1249
JAN 2 8 1997
,,,.
· ' ·
Petition Number
Da e
APPLICAT/ON FOR PUBLIC I-IEAPJNI~ ~,~' .~.,'.~" e.
COMMUNITY DEV£LO?M mT DIVISION
Name ofApplicant(s): _ Suneo Building Co _rpora60n
Applicant's Mailing Address:
City: . Naples
Applicant's Telephone Number:
3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ex-tension
State: FL Zip: 33999
(941 } 594-7400
Is the Applicant the owner of the ~bjeel property? . YES __,X_._NO
a) If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries below.
b)
If applicant is a corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers
and major s~ockholders below.
c)
If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate
name principals below.
d)
e)
If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other o~ers, if any.
If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on
the lease.
x 0
If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s)
name and address below.
Please refer to Joint Consent and Appoinhsient of Agents. Attachment 4-1 in ADA
(Ifspace is inadequate, attach on .separate page.)
Name ofAgent: _ Alan D. Reynolds. AICp
Firm:
Wilson. Miller. Barton. and Peek. Inc.
Agent's Mailing Address:
City: Naples State: FL
Agent's Telephone Number: ~
04/)9.'96- W-O~?20101 ,MCP
I-O?~2~-OI.PPUD
Zi
2. Name of Agent: George L. VarnadQ~
Young. van Assendetp and Varnadoe. P.A,
Agent's Mailing Address: 801 Laurel Oak Drive. Suite 300
City: _Naples
Agent's Telephone Number:
State: . FL Zip: 33969
941-597-2g14
DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE APPLICATION (If
space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If request involves change to more than one zoning district,
include separate legal description for property involved in each district. If property is odd-shaped, submit
copies of survey (1" to 400' scale).
THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION. IF
QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AN ENG~ER'S
CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED.
SECTION: 33 TOWNSHIP: . 4g South RANGE:
Detailed legal description is contained in the PUD document. Section 1,2
26 East
Size of Proper~': 6600 fi. x
Address or location of subject property:
one mile east ofi-75
5345 fl. Acres: _ 7054-
North side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. approximately
Existing Land Elevation: _ 12 feet-NGVD
ao
Date subject property acquired
da)' of ,19.
Term of Lease: , yrs./mos.
County Flood Criteria Elevation:
or leased ;
If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date ofoption: Please refer to Attachment 4-I in
Application for Development Approval,
and date option terminates:
Does property ov,~er own contiguous property to the subject property? If
description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separa
No.
04'19.96. W-07720101 MCP
I .O't72-07.0! .PPUD 2
10.
This application is intended to cover:. (Check which type ofpetition you are requesting):
-X_ A. Rezoning:
Present Zoning: _ A and A-ST _ Requested Zoning:
for:~ ~
-__ B. Conditional Use: ~£:- Zon/ng for:
Reason why appIicat/on should be approved. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.):
I1.
12.
13.
Is proposed use prohibited by deed restrictions? _
If yes, provide cop>, of the deed restrictions.
Is this request a result ora violation?...__.__i~
If so, to whom was the notice served?
__NO
Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year?_.____]~
Ifso, in whose name7
14. Are there existing structures on the property? ~
TYPE: CBS _ _, FRAME
-- ~ MOBILE HOME ~ OTHER
The site accommodates 13 mobile homes, which provide housing for employees of the agricultural operation
currently occurring on site. These mobile homes will be removed as development commences on the project.
0~'lg.'~e. 9,'"07720101 MCP
I-~?72-07.0! PPUD
3
I, Michael D. Rosen, Vice Pres/dent, Sunco Building Corporation, being first duly sworn, depose and say
that Sunco Building Corporation is the contract purchaser of the property described herein and which is the subject
manet of the proposed hearing; that ~ll the ~'ers to the questions in this application, and a/l sketches, data, and
other rupplementary mat~er attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best ofmy
knowledge and belief. I unde,siand this application must be comp/'cte and accurate before a hearing can be
adver6sed. I further permit the undersigned persons to act as my tepresentatlves in any matters regarding this
Petition.
Sunco Building Corporation
Senior Vice President
Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc.
George L. Vamadoe
Young, van Assenderp and Vamadoe, P.A.
STATE OF FLOR/DA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing Application was acknowl
as iden ' ' ~ ,0,no ~s persona,¥ ~own lo -- ---'
ts ~_.~ficat~on and who die'did not)~c~ oa"- me. or who has produced
..
_ 1996,
AGENDA 17EM ~
,JAN £ 8 1997
'19'96. ~"07720101MCP
72-07.01 .PPUD
4
ISLANDWALK
A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
705± Acres Located in Sections 33 and 34
TownsMp 48 South, Range 26 East
Collier County, Florida
PREPARED FOR:
SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION
3600 Vanderbilt B~ach Road Extension
Naples, FL 33999
PREPARED BY:
WILS(SN, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC.
3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 33942
1-~72-07-0! PPUD
DATE FILEI
DATE APPROVED BY CCP(
DATE APPROVED BY BC(
ORDINANCE NUMBEI~
TABL£ OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE
SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, &
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
SECTION III RESIDENTIAL
SECTION IV TOWN CENTER
SECTION V WETLAND CONSERVATION AREA
EXHIBIT A ISLANDWALK MASTER PLAN (WM~&P File No. RZ-247)
ii
1-1
2-I
3-1
4-1
5-1
01~317
1-0772-~?-01 PPUD
JAN ~ 8 1997
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The purpose of this section is to express the intent of the Sunco Building Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as Sunco or the Developer, to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 7054- acres
ofland located in Sections 33 and 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be IslandWalk. The development oflslandWalk
will be in substantial compliance with the plan-ting goals and objectives of Collier County as set
forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the growth
policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan
Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons:
The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use Residential Dislrict as identified on the
Future Land Use Map as required in Objective 1, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE).
The purpose of the Urban Mixed Use Residential District is to provide for higher density
residential uses in an area with relatively few natural resource constraints and where
existing and planned public facilities are concentrated.
The proposed residential density of IslandWalk is three (3) units per acre and less than the
maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System and is therefore
consistent with FLUE Policy 5.1. The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of
four units per acre.
The retail and services uses proposed for the IslandWalk Town Center meet the criteria of
the PUD Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict as o0tlined in the FLUE, and therefore, are
consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the following reasons:
Ao
The Town Center commercial uses are more than two (2) miles flora the nearest
activity center or PUD neighborhood commercial often (10) acres or more in size.
B. The Town Center commercial uses will be developed on fifteen (1 $) acres or less.
Co
The frontage/depth criteria is not applicable since the commercial area has no true
road frontage being located internal to the project.
o
Due to the internal' ~rientation, types of uses, and multi-purpose function of the
Town Center, the County waives the limitation that 50% of the residt
permits must be issued prior to development of the Town Center retail
IslandWalk is compatible with and complementary to existing and future sun
uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE.
with apt
~mprovements are planned to be in substantial cclmpliance
development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 ofthe FLUE.
Ol ~}.'~1 -W.,077201a~ AU
1.0772-0?.01 PPUD
ii
The development of lslandWalk will result in an efficient and economical extension of
community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of Ore FLUE.
IslandWalk is a large scale functionally interrelated community, and is planned to
encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination as set forth in ~e Collier County Land
Development Code (LDC) Planned Unit Development District.
SHORT TITLE
This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "ISLANDWALK PLANNED UNIT
DE% ELOPMENT ORDINANCE".
01~)3/97 -W-0772014.1 AU
1-0772~?-01 PPUD
I11
JAN 2 8 1997
SECTION I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of
lslandWalk, and lo describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be
developed.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest I/4 of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East,
subject to an easement for public road right-of-way over and across the West 30 feet thereof
and the South 30 feet thereof'.
AND
The South 1/2 ofthe Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, TownsMp 4g South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, and subject to an easement for public road fight-of.
wa), over and across the West 30 feet thereof.
AND
The North 1/2 ofthe Northwest I/4 ofthe Southwest I/4 of Secdon 34, Township 4g south,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and subject to an easement for public road right-of-
way over and across the North 30 feet thereofand the West 30 feet thereof.
LESS AND EXCEPT:
The following described propen3' situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida:
The South 170 feet of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, andi
feet of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; by Order of Taking,!
1456-CA-01-HDH, recorded in OR Book 1215, Page 1662.
01K)3~9~-W-G'~?2014~ ALJ
1-0772.C?.01 PPUD
I-!
EN --
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSItlP
The subject property is currently under the equitable ownership or control of Sunco
Building Corporation, or their assigns, whose address is 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road,
Naples, FL 33999. Detailed ownership information is provided on Attachment 4-1 of the
lslandWalk Application for Development Approval.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The project site is located in Sections 33 and 34, Township 48 South, Range 26
East, and is generally bordered on the west by E-Estates zoned, platted and
developed property; on the north by Agriculturally zoned and undeveloped land and
by PUD zoned and developing property; on the ea~ by Agriculturally zoned and
unplatted property; and on the south, across Vanderbilt Beach Road by E-Estates
and Agriculturally zoned property. The location of the site is shown on Map A of
the IslandWalk Application for Development Approval.
The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application is A
(Rural Agricultural), with a small wetland area being designated A-ST (Special
Treatment).
Co
Elevations within the site are approximately 12 feet-NGVD. Per FEMA Firm Map
Panels No. 120067 0215D and 0425D, dated June 3, 1986, the IslandWalk property
is located within Zones "X" of the FEMA flood insurance rate. Topographic
mapping is shown on Map C of thb IslandWalk Application for Development
Approval.
The site has been altered through past and current agricultural uses and therefore,
was granted a waiver of the requirement of submittal of an Environmental Impact
Statement ELS), pursuant to Section 3.8.9 of the LDC.
01~03.~7 .W-0772014~ Al2
1.0'~72.O?.OI PPUD
The soil types on the site generally include Holopaw fine sand, Malabar fine sand,
Riviera limestone substratum, Copeland fine sand, Pineda fine sand, and Boca
limestone substratum. Soil Conservation Service mapping of soil types is shown on
Map E of the IslandW. alk Application for Development Approval.
Prior to development, vegetation on site primarily consists of activ(
fields, including agricultural facilities. One isolated wetland systen
located on the northeast portion of the project site. This system is p~
willow with most cypress occurring offsite. This system has been distu
activities, such as farm ditching and berming, and exotic invasiot
vegetation mapping is shown on Map ,F of the IslandWalk Ap!
Development Approval.
!-2
1.5
1.6
The project site is located within the Main Golden Gate System, 1-75 Canal sub-
basin, as depicted within the Collier County Drainage Atlas (May, 1990). The
Stormwater Management Master Plan is shown on Map I of' the IslandWalk
Application for Development Approval.
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
Due to its scope, IslandWalk has been reviewed and approved by Collier County pursuant
to Section 380.06, EI.~, as a Development of Regional Impact (DP, I).
DENSITY
Ao
Acreage of IslandWalk is approximately 705 acres and the number of dwelling units
authorized to be built pursuant to this PUD is 2,100. The gross project density,
therefore, will be a maximum of 3.0 units per acre.
Bo
At all times all property included within IslandWalk as described in Section 1.1
shall be included in determining project density.
0l '0.lq? .W,.0~7201,~.~ ALI
I-0T/2-0~'.,01 PPUD
1-.1
SECTION II
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
2.1
2.2
2.3
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for
IslandWalk, and to identi~ relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and
procedures.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES
IslandWalk, a private community, will include a range of single family and multi-
family housing along with a centrally located Town Center, which will provide
many services and facilities that support its residents, including, but not limited to
community meeting rooms, central postal facility, small scale neighborhood retail
goods and services, and a recreation and aquatic center.
Bo
The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A" (WMB&P, Inc. File No.
EZ-247). A Land Use Summao, indicating approximate land use acreages is shown
on the plan. The location, size, and configuration of individual tracts shall be
determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor
adjustments at the time of Final Plat approval, in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2, of
the LDC.
COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES
Ao
Regulations for development of lslandWalk shall be in accordance with the contents
of this PUD Ordinance, and to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD
Ordinance, applicable sections of the LDC and Collier County Growth
Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development
order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of
improvements, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site
Development Plan, Excavation Permit and Preliminary Work Authorization. Where
this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental stmdards, then the provisions
of the specific sectioh of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply.
01/03~97
Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by
definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth
effect at the time of development order application.
Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will, be subject to
'PuNic Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 &the LDC.
2-1
Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or by subsequent request, the
provisions of other applicable land development c. odes remain in effect with respect
to the development of the land which comprises this PUD.
All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the IslandWalk Mas~er Plan are
pan of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be
developed.
The Subdivisions Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.2) shall apply to
IslandWalk, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted
pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.2.4.
The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall
apply to IslandWalk, except where an exemption is set forth herein or othera'ise
granted pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.3.4.
For purposes of the various impact fee ordinances, residential uses, other than the
conventional single family detached dwellings, shall be classified as either muhi-
family or condominlum/townhouse in accord with definitions of the applicable
impact fee ordinance.
2.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Ao
The developer may elect to establish the IslandWalk Development District (CDD)
to provide and maintain infrastmcttire and community facilities needed to serve the
Project. The CDD will constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and
economic way to ensure the provision of facilities and infrastructure for the
proposed development. Such infrastructure as may be constructed, managed and
financed by the CDD shall be subject to, and shall not be inconsistent with, the
Collier County Growth Management Plan and all applicable ordinances dealing
with planning and permitting oflslandWalk.
B. The land area is amenable to infrastructure provision by a district that has the
powers set forth in the charier ora Community Development District under Section
190.006 through 190.041, Florida StatuteS. Such a district is a legitimate alternative
available both to t}m County and to the landowner for the timely and sustained
provision of quality infrastructure under the terms and condition,. ,~c r~,,,,,,
development approval.
2.5 SUBSTITUTIONS TO DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROADWAYS 'JAN 2 8 1997
A. Roadways within lslandWalk may be included as one of the cr D .prqvj.ded {~
infrastructure improvements. Standard~ for roads shall be in corn
applicable provisions of LDC regulating subdivisions, unless otbe 5.-[
waived or excepted by this PUD or approved during Preliminary St~bdivisi0n~:~
approval. The Developer reserves the fight to request substitutions to Code design
standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. The Developer retains the
fight to establish gates, guardhouses, and other access contzols as may be deemed
appropriate by the Developer on all privately owned and maintained project
roadways and roadways built and/or maintained by the IslandWalk CDD.
Roadways within lslandWalk shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
Section 3.2.8.4.16 of the LDC with the following substitutions:
Street fight-of, way width: The minimum fight-of-way width to be utilized
for a local street shall be fifb/($0) feet, unless a substitution is approved
allowing a nan'ower width.
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall be 2,100 feet. When islands are to be
installed within a cul-de-sac, an inside edge ofpavement radius of no greater
than twenty (20) feet shall be required.
Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of
a twenty-five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project s'a'eets
and thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances.
Reverse Curves: Tangent shall not be required between reverse curves on
any project streets.
2.6 LAKE SETBACK A~ND EXCAVATION
An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division
3.5 of the LDC and SFWMD rules. The lake setback requirements described in Section
3.5.7.1 of the LDC may be reduced with the administrative approval of the Community
Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Commercial excavation and
off-site hauling of up to 500,000 cubic yards of excess of rock and fill materials shall be a
permitted use within this PUD subject to the receipt of a commercial excavation permit
which shall be administratively processed by the Community Development and
Environmental Services Administrator. Al! lakes greater than two (2) acres may be
excavated to the maximum .commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 3.5.7.3. !.
2.7
USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY
Utilization of lands within all project fights-of-way for landscaping,.decora
ways, and signage shall be allowed subject to review and administrative apl~
Developer and the Collier Count), Development Services Director for cng
safety consid,erations during the development review process and prior !o any i~
ve entrance
ovad qd e8 1997
'~eering andf_,2,,
;tallatii~s /
01,'0~,'~7 .W.0772014.~ ALJ
1-'0772-07.~1 PPUD
2-3
2.8
MODEL HOMES/SALES CENTERS/SALES OFFICES/
CONSTRUCTION OFFICES
Model homes, sales centers, sales offices, construction offices, and other uses and structures
related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing
.platforms, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses
throughout IslandWalk. These uses may be either wet or dry facilities. These uses shall be
subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 and Section 3.2.6.3.6, of the LDC, with the
exception that the temporary use permit shall be valid through the life of the project with no
extension of the temporary use required; provided that the same shall not be located
adjacent to previously developed and conveyed residential units. These uses may use septic
tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under F.A.C. 10D-6, and
may use potable or irrigation wells.
2.9
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER
PLAN
Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Plan as
provided Lq Section 2.7.3.5 of the LD¢. Minor changes and refinements as described herein
may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit
application required by the LDC.
The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator shall be
authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the lslandWalk Master Plan upon
,,Tit'ten request of the Developer.
A. The following limitations shall apply to such requests:
The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County
Growth Management Plan and the IslandWalk PUD document.
o
The minor change or refinement shall meet the criterion of Section
380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes, and shall not require a determination and
Public Hearing pursuant thereto.
The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a sul
pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5.1. ofthe LDC.
The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with ad
and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting lar
management facilities, and conservation areas within or exten
The following shall be deemed minor changes or refinements:
01G.ltg? -W4)~72014~ ALI
2-4
[cen~g~sl~3[t7
d uses, water
~al to tI~.PUD. ~.~2.-
Recordigurafion of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management
facilities where such changes are consisten! with the criteria of the South
Florida Water Management District and Collier County.
Intemal realignment of rights-of-ways, other than a relocation of access
points to the PUD itself, where no water management facility,
conservation/preservation areas, or required easements are affected or
otherwise provided for.
Reconfiguration of residential parcels when there is no encroachment into
the conservation area.
Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate
Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and re£mements are otherwise in
compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the
Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator's
consideration for approval.
Approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services
Administrator of a minor change or refinement may ~x.,-,u' independently fi.om and
prior to any application for Subdivision or Site Development Plan approval,
however such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or
implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other
necessary County permits and approvals.
2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
2.11
Most common area maintenance will be provided by the CDD or by a Property Owner's
Association. The CDD is a legitimate alternative for the timely and sustained provision of
quality common area irtfrastruc~e and maintenance under the terms and conditions of a
County development approval. For those areas not maintained by the CDD, the Developer
will create a property owners association or associations, whose functions shall include
provision for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. The CDD
or the property ovmers association, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation,
maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems
and reserves serving IslandWalk, in accordance with the provisions of Collier County
Ordinance 90-48 and Resolution 90-292, together with any applicable pen
South Florida Water Management District.
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS
Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a
throughout IslandWalk. The follo"wing standards shall apply:
A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes:
2.$
01,~q?
1-0772-07-01 PPUD
2.
3.
4.
Grassed berms 3:1
Ground covered berms 3:1
Rip-Pap berms I: !
Structural walled berms, venical
Fence or wall maximum height: seven feet (7'), as measured from the £m~shed floor
elevation of the nearest residential structure wi~n the development. If the fence or
wall is consm~cted on a landscape berm, the wall shall not exceed six feet (6') in
height ~'om the top of berm elevation for berm elevation with an average side slope
of 4:1 or less, and shall not exceed six feet (6') in height from the top of berm
elevation for berms with an average s~de slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1).
Landscape buffera, ben'ns, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter
of the IslandWalk PUD boundary prior to preliminary subdivision plat and site
development plan submittal. Ail such areas must be included in a landscape
easement or tract on final plats, or identified in a separate recorded instmment.
Do
Fences and walls wl'~ch are an integral part of secttdty and access control structures
such as gate houses and control gates shall be subject to the height limitations for
principal residential structures. In the case of access control structures witt~n right-
of-ways adjoining two or more different districts, the more restrictive height
standard shall apply.
Pedestrian sidewalks and/or bike paths, water management' systems, drainage
structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers.
Landscape berms located within the IslandWalk PUD boundary and contiguous to a
property line and/or fight-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope
is located on the property line and/or right-of-way line.
2.12 FILL STORAGE
Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout IslandWalk. Fill material
generated from properties owned or leased by the developer may be transported and
stockpiled within areas whi~:h have been disturbed/farmed. Prior to stockpiling in these
locations, the developer shall notify the Community Development and
Services Administrator per Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the LDC The following
apply:
A. Stockpile maximum height: forty-five feet (45')
B. Fill storage areas in excess of five feet (5') in height shall be
developed areas by fencing, excavated water bodies or other physic~
side slope of the stockpile is steeper than 4 to 1 (i.e. 3 to 1).
2-6
01~03,~'~ -9/-07?20115 All
1-07'72-0'/.01 PPUD
'JAN 1997
C. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with LDC Division 3.7.
2.13 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
go
The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage
ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or
redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control,
as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20.3.
IslandWalk is planned as a private, functionally interrelated community under
unified control. The Developer has established community-wide design guidelines
and standards to ensure a high and eo~istent level of quality for community
features and facilities, which include features and facilities such as landscaping,
hardscape, waterscapes, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, bicycle paths,
pavement treatments, roadway medians, fences, walls, buffers, berms and other
similar facilities. Upon approval of specific design guidelines and standards by the
Developer, those guidelines shall be considered as supplemental standards to the
requirements of this Planned Unit Development Ordinance.
2.14 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING
Submission, review, and approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plats for the project may be
accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property.
2.15 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES
The site is currently used for active row crop agricultural purposes, and associated and
accessory uses thereto. These existing agricultural uses shall be permitted to continue
throughout the project site and will be phased out as development occurs within individual
parcels.
2.16 GENERAL PERMITTED USES
Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the lslandWalk PUD
except in the Wetland Con. servation Area. General permitted uses are those uses which
generally serve the Developer and residents of IslandWalk and are typi, allypaxll~e~'
common infrastructure or are considered community facilities.
A. General Permit'ted Uses: g 8 1997
I. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. ~_
2. Water management facilities and related structures.
PPUD
Bo
3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities.
Lakes including lakes with bul~eads or other architectural or structural
bank a'eatments.
5. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures.
6. Community and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities.
Temporary construction, sales, and adminis~'ative offices for the Developer
and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary
access gays, parking areas and related uses.
Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms,
fences and Wls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.11 of this
PUD.
Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this PUD.
Site filling and grading as set forth in Section 2.23 ofthis PUD.
10.
Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and
which the Community Development and Environmental Services
Administrator determines to be compatible.
Development Standards:
Unless otherwise set forth in this document, the following development standards
shall apply to structures:
Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - fifteen feet
(I$') except for guard houses, gatehouses, and access control structures
which shall have no required setback.
1.077J-07-01 PPUD
Setback from property lines:
Front: 25 feet (25')
· Side: 7 feet (7')
Rear: 15 feet (15')
Minimum distance between structures which are pan of an arcl
unified grouping - five feet (5').
Minimum distance .,between uru-elated structures - ten feet (10').
Maximum height of structures - twenty-five feet (25').
2-8
6. Minimum floor area - None required.
7. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required.
Sidewalks and bikepaths may occur within County required buffers;
however the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately
to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk or bikepath.
Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such
gandards are not specified herein or within adopted lslandWalk design
guidelines and standards, are to be in accordance with the LDC provision in
effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval.
2.17 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
The PUD Master Plan identifies approximately 276 acres included in the Wetland
Conservation Area, lakes, and open space/buffer designations. These areas, in conjunction
with open space areas included within the Residential District, fully satisfy the 30% open
space requirements of Section 2.6.32 of the LDC.
2.18 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
The preservation of the 1.6 acre wetland conservation area shall fully satisfy the
requirements of Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the
Collier County Gro,.~J~ Management Plan.
2.19 SIGNAGE
A. GENERAL
All Collier County sign regulations in force at the time of approval shall
apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth
in this section, in which case the PUD Document shall govern.
Ol.'03,q?
1-0772-0'~-01 PPUD
For the purpose of this PUD Document, each platted parcel shall be
considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as
permitted herein.
Should any of the signs be requested to be placed wil
dedicated right-of-way, a right-of way permit must be a
approved.
Ail signs shall be located so as not to cause sight iihe obstruc
AGE I E
2-9
01~03,97 .W.0772014~ ALI
1-0172.07-OI .PPUD
All internal project right, of-ways may be utilized for decorative
landscaped entrance features and signage subject to review and approval
from Project Review Services for consistency with the requirements set
forth herein.
BOUNDARY MARKERS
One boundary marker or monument may be located at each property
comer. The boundary marker may contain the name of the subdivision,
and the insignia or motto of the development.
The sign face area may not exceed 60 square feet in area and may not
exceed the height or length of the monument upon which it is located. If
the sign is two-sided, each sign face may not exceed 60 square feet in area.
o
Sign face square footage is calculated by total square footage of name,
insignia, and motto only.
The setback for the signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future Logan
Boulevard fight-of, ways and any perimeter property line shall be I0 feet.
ENTRANCE SIGNS
Two ground or wall-mounted entrance signs maybe located at each
entrance to the subdivision. 'Such signs may contain the name of the
subdivision, and the insignia or motto of the development.
o
No sign face area may exceed 65 square feet and the total sign face area of
Entrance Signs at each entrance may not exceed 130 square feet. If the
sign is a single, two-sided sign, each sign face may not exceed 65 square
feet in area. The sign face area shall not exceed the height or length of the
wall or monument upon which it is located.
The setback for the signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future Logan
Boulevard right-of-ways, and any perimeter property line shall be I0 feet.
Entrance signs may not exceed a height of 12 feet above the finished
ground level of the sign site. For the purpose of this pro
grade shall be considered to be no greater than 18 inches al
crown elevation of the nearest road, unless the wall
constructed on a perimeter landscape berm.
2-10
D. TEMPORARY SIGNS
Temporary signs may be permitted, and may consist of the following
types: project identification, boundary marker, real esuate, sales center
identification, and directional.
Each sign may not exceed 200 square feet in area. If the sign is two-sided,
each sign face may not exceed 200 square feet in area.
The setback for temporary signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future
Logan Boulevard right-of-ways, and any perimeter property line shall be
10 feet.
Temporary signs may not exceed 20 feet in height above the finished
ground level of the sign site.
Temporary signs may remain in place simultaneously with permanent
signage until the project reaches 99% build-out.
o
Temporary signs may be permitted subject to the requirements outlined
above. The erection of any temporary sign shall require permitting as
emblished within section 2.5.12 of the LDC. Application fees for
temporary sign permits shall be the minimum fee as required for a
siandard sign within the district.
E. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SIGNS
One sign, with a maximum of 20 square feet in size, may be located at
each construction entrance, to identif~ the entrance as such. No building
permit is required.
Employment signs with a maximum of 20 square feet in size, may be
located at each construction entrance, to advertise for construction trades.
No building permit is required.
F. INTERNAL SIGNS
01 ~3.'9'~ .W.0'~72014,S ALJ
Residential directional or identification signs may be allow,
the subdivision. Such signs may be used to identi~y the
direction of approved uses such as models or model sales
house, recreational areas, etc. Individual signs may be a m
square feet, per side in size, or signs maintaining a common
theme may' be combined to form a menu board with a maximt
square feet per side, and a maximum height of g feet. No bu
is required.
2-11
Commercial directional or identification signs may be allowed internal to
the subdivision. Such signs may be used to identify the location or
direction of approved uses such as sales centers, information centers,
Town Center, or the individual components of the development.
Individual signs may be a maximum of 6 square feet per side or signs
maintaining a common architectural theme may be combined to form a
menu board with a maximum size of 64 square feet per side and a
maximum height ofg feet. No building permit is required.
The developer may have Real Estate signs with a maximum size of 4
square feet per side in residential districts. Such signs may advertise "For
Sale", "Sold To", "Lot #", etc. No building permit is required.
Special Event signs not exceeding 32 square feet per side in size may be
displayed to announce or advertise such temporary uses as open houses,
community fairs or programs or any charitable, educational event. Such
sign shall be located no closer than 15 feet to any property line. No
building permit is required.
Grand Opening signs: The developer may display an on-site grand
opening sign not exceeding 32 square feet on a side, and not exceeding 64
square feet total. The banner sign shall be anchored and may be displayed
on-site for a period not exceeding 14 days within the first three months
that the occupant is open for business. No buildihg permit is required.
G. COMMERCIAL SIGNS
1-07~2.0%01 PPUD
Wail, mansard, canopy or awning signs: One wall, mansard, canopy or
awning sign may be permitted for each single-occupancy parcel, or for
each establishment in a multiple-occupancy parcel. Comer units within
multiple-occupancy parcels, or multi-frontage single-occupancy parcels
shall be allowed three signs, but such signs shall not be combined for the
purpose of placing the combined area on one wall. In addition, outparcels
within the Tov, a Center may be allowed one additional wall sign facing
the Town Cehter if the additional sign is not visible from any road R.O.W.
However, the combined area of those signs shall not exceed the maximum
allowable display area for signs by this ordinance. AGENDA,iT[M/
The maximum allowable display area for signs may
than 20 percent of the total square footage of the vist
the building to which the sign ,.'ill be attache,d and ma'
case, exceed 250 square feet in area for any sign.
2-12
a)
Pole signs: Two (2) pole signs are permitted for each internal street,
provided there is a 500 foot separation between such signs.
a)
b)
c)
d)
Maximum allowable sign area: 100 square feet per side, if two-
sided
Maximum allowable height: 20 feet
Setbacks: I 0 feet from any right.of-way or property line
Spot or floodlights may be permitted provided said light shines
only on the signs and is shielded from motorists and adjacent
residents.
Projecting signs: Projecting signs may be substituted for wall or mansard
signs provided that the display area of the projecting sign shall not exceed
60 square feet ofdisplay area.
a)
Projecting signs shall not project more than four feet from the
building wall to which it is at,ached.
b)
Projecting signs shall not extend above the roofline of the building
to which it is attached.
c) Projecting signs shall not project into the right-of-way.
d)
Projecting signs which project over any pedestrian way shall be
elevated to a minimum height of 8 feet above such pedestrian/my.
Under-canopy signs: In addition to any other sign allowed by this
ordinance, one under-canopy sign may be allowed for each establishment
in the Town Center. This sign may not exceed 6 square feet in area and
shall be a minimum ofeight feet above finished grade.
H. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic signs such as street signs, stop signs, speed limit signs, etc. may be
designed to reflect a common architectural theme. The placement and size
of the signs k'ill be in accordance with DOT criteria.
2.20 SIDEWALKS/BIKEPATHS
Pursuant to LDC Section 3.2.8.3.17.7, lslandWalk PUD
sidewalks/bikepaths as follows:
OI ~3~)? .W-07720145 ALI
1-0772-07~! PPUD
I
A five foot wide gidewalk/bikepath on one side of all streel:
2-13
~hal,I..IA~o~t~e1997
JAN,,~~...~
7/
An interaal pedestrian walkway system along the interior lake, permitted
within the drainage easement(s).
The Developer reserves the right to request other substitutions to Code design
st;mdards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC.
2.21 UTILITIES
Ao
The Developer may construct the potable and irrigation water services including
the tap, service main, and meter box. The County shall install the meter as
required.
The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards
in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC.
Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission to serve the project shall
be designed, constructed, conveyed and/or owned and maintained in accordance
with Collier County Ordinance 8g-76, as amended and all other applicable
County, State and Federal regulations which might apply.
Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems shall be
constructed throughout the project development by developer and shall be
conveyed to the Collier County Water/Sewer District for ownership, operation
and maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate County ordinances and
regtilations in effect at the time of conveyance.
Eo
All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats, if
applicable, for the proposed water and sewage collection and transmission
facilities must be reviewed and approved by Community Development,
engineering review services prior to the commencement of development.
Detailed hydraulic design reports covering the water distribution and sewage
collection and transmission systems to serve the project shall be submitted with
the construction documents for the project. The reports shall list all design
assumptions, demand rates and other factors pertinent to the system under
consideration.
G. Ail customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage colle-",.i~., ~~ ,, ,, f~j~_~;)~ T£ - -'
to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be
County in accordance with the County's established rates. / JAN g8 199-7
H. The on-~ite water distribution system to serve the project shall b~ cot
district Water main on Vanderbilt Beach Road. However, there is to
connection to the 30" concrete main. The points of connections
existing fire hydrant leads abutting the project. The project's
2-14
01~0~17 .W.0'~72014~ AL./
1-0772-07-01 PPUD
shall include a stub terminating with a dead end fire hydrant at the Project's
eastern boundary which shall afford the opportunity for a connection of the
system with any future system serving the abutting property. No provisions are to
be made, however, for the project's system to meet the demand generated by the
abutting property; this shall be the obligation of the abutting owner(s).
The sixteen inch (16") force main which presently ends at the Vineyards
Development on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be extended to the
point of service connection for the project and the main shall be suitably marked
and equipped for future extension. The size of the force main extension shall be
that required to serve the service area and the value of any oversizing to serve
third parties shall be granted to the Developer as impact fee or system
development credits pursuant to an appropriate Developer's Agreement.
Jo
The sewer system shall be hydraulically analyzed from the project to the County's
present North County Wastewaler Treatment Plant and the developer shall be
responsible for the upgrade of any Lift Station which according to the report
would not operate to the full capacity for which the station was designed
originally. The County shall provide the Developer with any and all available
design and operational data on the force main system and all pumping stations
connected to it and, further, will provide the results of any hydraulic modeling of
the system for use by Developer's consultants in the preparation of the report.
2.22 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
The Developer shall cooperate with County staff in the implementation of a
master drainage plan for the "Harvey Basin." In that regard, provision for the
project to accept or pass through historical flows emanating from Section 27 and
those portions of Section 28 and 34 which historically flowed across or around the
project, as shovm on Exhibit B (WMP&B's Drawing CEX-333 - Sheets I and 2)
hereto, shall be addressed as follows:
014)3 ~/'~ .W-O??~OI4~ All
I-~.?-07-01 PPUD
The internal surface water management system for lslandWalk and the
drainage outfall structure will be designed to accomodate the off-site
flows shown, on Exhibit B - Sheet I, as will the specified outfall canal.
The Developer will provide connecting piping from lslandWalk's inlemal
surface water management system to the connection points
Exhibit B - Sheet I. Connection of off-site drainage facili
connection points, including off-site control structures, sh
responsibility of Collier County.
If the County desires to: and is in a position to implement
Basin Master Plan, prior to lhe development of those port
IslandWalk Project necessary to accommodate said off-site d,
by accepting the same into its internal surface water manage:
2-15
shown by
JAN 2 8 1997
then the Developer shall grant a "temporary" easement along the north and
west sides of the lslandWalk Project (Section 33) at the locations and at
the dimensions shown on Exhibit B - Sheet 2. This temporary easement
will be granted within thirty days of the County's written request, which
request shall not be made until the County has received all applicable
permits for the use of said temporary easement for drainage facilities.
Said temporary easement or the applicable portions thereof shall be
vacated upon the completion of the appropriate portions of lslandWalk's
internal system into which the off-site improvements can be connected.
The County will be responsible for removing the temporary improvements
and to restore the property to its original state at its sole expense.
Ail of the foregoing are subject to the County obtaining the necessary easements
from surrounding landowners and permits from the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD). The Project shall receive credits toward special
assessments or taxes ifa MSTBU is established in the amount of the value of any
property utilized, or on which easements are granted, and for the cost of
oversizing the components of the IslandWalk's internal surface water
management system, including the ouffall structure, to accomplish the foregoing
in accordance with the LDC Section 2.7.2.8. I.
The County agrees that the Developer may fill that portion of the existing
Vanderbil[ Beach Road drainage swale within or adjacent to Section 33, provided
that the Developer shall be responsible for providing the required water
management infrastructure, and designing its internal water managemeni system
to accept the runoff from the ultimate roadway section for that portion of
Vanderbilt Beach Road adjacent to Section 33 into the lslandWalk Project in
accordance with SFWMD criteria.
Do
A copy of' the SFWMD surface water permit and staff report or early work
authorization is required prior to construction plan approval within the
IslandWalk Project.
Eo
Design and permitting of the Harvey Basin Master Plan improvements shall
ensure that SFWMD water quality criteria shall be met for all off-site water to be
routed through the lglandWalk Project.
2.23
SITE FILLING AND GRADING AarNDA~iT~EM _
The IslandWalk site has ~en previously clewed ~d f~ed. ~ Cq~ym~7
Development ~d Enviromenml Se~ices Administrator may, therefore, a~min~t~,e~yI=
approve site alterations which exceed 25 acres in area pursuant lo Section ~2.8.3.6.3.,
1.0', 72-o'~.ol PPUD
2-16
2.24
TRANSPORTATION
As depicted on the Master Plan, Exhibit A, the developer has reserved a 150' wide
R/W corridor along the western boundary of the project for the future extension of
Logan Boulevard. The developer has also agreed to accept stormwater runoff
from the depicted portion of Logan Boulevard into the Project's stormwater
management system in return for road impact fee credits. The value of such road
impact fee credits shall be determined pursuant to a Developer Contribution
Agreement between the developer and the Board of County Commissioners.
The Developer shall provide both an eastbound left turn lane and a westbound
right turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road at the main project entrance. Such turn
lanes shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy.
Connection permits shall be required for all temporary construction access points.
Such permits shall include any necessary auxiliary lanes and apron paving
requirements prior to the use of the temporary access point. Any such temporary
construction access point shall effectively prohibit internal resident or service
traffic from use of the access point.
Future access points to the Logan Boulevard Extension not shown on the
IslandWalk Master Plan shall be consistent with the Access Management Policy
then in effect.
Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the developer at the project's
main entrance in conjunction with the development of this entrance.
The design of the project's stormwater management system shall not impede the
County's ability to improve Vanderbilt Beach Road to its ultimate design section
and to provide for required stormwater management facilities.
Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 92-
22, as amended.
1-0772-0'/-01 PPUD
2-17
AGE I
PI. / ~
SECTION III
RESIDENTIAL
~.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for
areas within lslandWalk designated on the Master Plan as "R."
3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
A maximum number of 2100 residential dwelling units may be constructed on lands
designated "R."
3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Areas designated as "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of
residential dwelling types, compatible non-residential uses, a full range of recreational
facilities, essential services, and customary accessory uses.
The approximate acreage of the "R" district is indicated on the PUD Master Plan. This
acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all
development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary
Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively,
of the LDC. Resident/al tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open
spaces, and other similar uses found in residential areas.
3.4 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Principal Uses:
!. Single Family Detached Dwellings.
3.
4.
5.
01t03~9~ -~,'-0~720145 ALI
1.0772-07-01 PPUD
Single Family Patio and Zero Lot Line Dwellings.
Two-family and Duplex Dwellings.
Single Family Attached and Townhouse Dwellings.
Multi-Family Dwellings including Garden Apartments.
3-1
JAN 8 1997
Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services
Administrator determines to be compatible in the "R" District.
B. Accessory Uses and Structures:
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses
permitted in this district.
Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services
Administrator. determines to be compatible in the "R" District.
3.~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the 'R' Residential
District.
Site development standards for single family, zero lot line, two-family, and town
home uses apply to individual residential lot boundaries. Multi-family standards
apply to platted parcel boundaries.
Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards
are not specified herein or within adopted IslandWalk design guidelines and
standards, are to be in accordance with LDC in effect at the ih'ne of Site
Development Plan Approval subdivision. Unless otherwise indicated, required
yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures.
Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be
established during Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Article 3,
Division 3.3. ofthe Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of
the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use.
01~)~l'~t .W-0772014S ALJ
I-O', 72-O?-01 PPUD
In the case of residential areas with a traditional neighborhood development (TND),
the TND s~ll be deemed a common architectural theme. Required property
development regulations may be approved that are different than those set forth in
Table !, subject to approval by the Collier County Planning Commission, in
accordance with the criteria contained in Section 2.6.27.4.6.1 througb~ 9 t: '~-t a ~: '~
Ofsectionthe LDC.2.17 of thisC°mm°npUD.°pen space requirements are deemed satisfie
.JAN 2 8 1997
SECTION IV
TOWN CENTER
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
PURPOSE
The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for
areas within lslandWalk designated on the Master Plan as "Town Center."
MAXIMUM SQUAREFOOTAGE
A maximum of 30,000 square feet floor area, including approximately I0,000 square feet of
retail uses, 15,000 square feet of service uses, and 5,000 square feet of recreational uses
may be constructed on lands designated "Town Center."
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The approximate acreage of the "Town Center" district is indicated on the Master Plan.
This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all
development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary
Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively,
of the LDC. The Tov,'n Center tract- is designed to accommodate internal roadways, open
spaces, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses found in the
recreational, community center, and neighborhood commercial areas.
PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in
whole or part, for other than the following:
A. Permitled Principal Uses and Structures:
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
01/03~?. W,O?7201~5 ALJ
1.10'~72.07.01 .ppLrD
Accotmting, Auditing and Bookkeeping Services (Group 8721 ).
i-/ggg[~l)I.g
JAN 2 8
Automatic Teller Machines (Group 3578).
Amusements and Recreation Services - Indoor (Groups 79
7993, 7997).
Apparel and Accessory Stores (Groups 5611-5699).
Gasoline Service Stations (Group 5541).
Automotive Carwashes (Group 7542).
Business Services (Groupg 7334, 7349).
Eating and Drinking Places (Groups 5812-5813) except drive-~
Food Stores (Groups 54 ! 1-5499).
4-1
JAN
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
General Merchandise Stores (Groups 5311-5399).
Miscellaneous Retail (Groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999).
Personal Services (Groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 non-industrial dry
cleaning only, 72 ! 7, 7219-7251,7291-7299).
Real Estate (Groups 6512, 6531,654 I).
Recreation Services (Groups 7911,7991, 7993, 7997, 7999)
Residential uses as set forth in Section 3.4 of this document including
residential units integral to Town Center structure(s) and as free standing
uses. Free slanding residential uses shall comply with the development
standards set forth in Section 3.5.
United States Postal Service (Group 43 ! 1 except major distribution center).
Video Tape Rental (Group 7841).
Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses (including general and professional offices not specifically listed
above) and which the Development Services Director determines to be
compatible in the "Town Center" district.
B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures
Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses
permitted in this district.
Customary accessory uses include, but are not limited to, recreational
facilities that serve as an integral part of the permitted uses such as pool,
tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and pla)fields.
Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing
uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be
compatible in the "Town Center" district.
4.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Minimum Yard Requirements:
3.
4.
5.
01 ~3'97. W-07720145 ALJ
1-0' 72.07..01 PPUD
Front Yard:
height, whichever is greater.
Side Yard: Fifteen feet (15').
Rear Yard: Fifteen feet (15').
Any yard abutting a residential parcel: Twenty-five feet (25').
Setback fr6m a lake for all principal and accessory uses ma
(0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into~
Twenty-five feet (25') minimum or one-half the buildine
AB£N Db_IT~£ I~
J~ 2 8 1997
4-2
Co
Exterior lighting shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and
residential properties fi.om direct glare or unreasonable interference.
Maximum height of structures - Fifty feet (50'); except clock towers or similar
architectural features, which shall be permitted up to seventy-five feet (75').
Minimum distance between all other principal structures - Twenty feet (20').
Minimum distance between all other accessory structures - Ten feet (10').
Minimum floor area - Seven hundred (700) square feet gross floor area on the
ground floor.
Minimum lot or parcel area - Ten thousand (10,000) square feet.
Minimum lot width - Seventy five feet (75').
Parking for any and all uses and structures constructed in the Town Center District:
one (1) space per 200 square feet of building area.
Standards for landscaping and other land uses where such standards are not
specified herein or within adopted IslandWalk design guidelines and standards, are
to be in accordance with LDC in effect at the time of Site Development Plan
Approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area
standards apply to principal structures.
01~)~/97. W-07720145 AU
1-07724)?-01 PPUD
4-3
JAN 2 8 1997
PI. ~
SECTION V
WETLAND CONSERVATION AREA
5.1 PURPOSE
TI:re purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for the
area within IslandWalk designated on the Master Plan, as Wetland Conservation Area.
5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Areas designated as Wetland Conservation Area on the Master Plan are designed to
accommodate conservation and limited water management uses and functions.
5.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No building or st~cture, or pan thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water
used, in whole or in part, for other than the following:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures
1. Boardwalks and nature Ixails (excluding asphalt paved trails).
2. Water management facilities.
Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is
comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development
Services Director determines to be compatible in the Wetland Conservation
Area.
5.4 RESERVE DISTRICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
A non-exclusive conservati~ easement or tract is required by LDC Section 3.2.8.4.7.3 for
preservation lands included in the Wetland Conservation Area. The developer, their
successor or assign, or the IslandWalk CDD shall be responsible hr th,- ,-.,.,,,--,,~ ,,-~ --
maintenance of lands within the Wetland Conservation Area. No. ~2.] I
1
JAN281997 !
5-1
01/03/~7. W-0772014~ ALI
1-0772-074}1 PPUD
UAN 1
Pg
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION NO. PUD-87-31 (3), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIR.ONMENT~
SERVICES DIVISION REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GADALETA PUD,
ORDINANCE NO. 88-50, FOK THE PURPOSE OF DESIGNATING TWO (2) ACRES OF THE
GADALETA PUD AS A COMMERCIAL TRACT, ENTITLED TO ALL OF THE C-2 USES FOR
AN AREA PREVIOUSLY ZONED C-2 PRIOR. TO THE AMENDING OF ORDINANCE 88-50.
OBJECTIVE:
This petition seeks to amend the Gadaleta PUD to restore two (2) acres of commercially zoned land
that was inadvertently rezoned when the Gadaleta PUD was amended by Ordinance No. 89-84.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On September 10, 1996 staff asked the Board of County Commissioners for direction in dealing with
the matter of an apparent error in procedure and result when the Gadaleta PUD was amended by
Ordinance No. 89-84 having the effect of unintentionally rezoning two (2) acres of land with a C-2
commercial designation. The Board directed staff to prepare an amendment restoring the two (2) acres
of commercially zoned land but to include the two (2) acres in the Gadaleta PUD. The method and
procedure for accomplishing this action was taken under review by the County's legal staff, who
recently advised us as to the proper form of amendment procedure.
The Collier County Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 1997 and by a unanimous
vote (7 to 0) recommended approval of the action to restore the C-2 commercial acreage and to
incorporate same in the Gadaleta PUD.
No person spoke or otherwise communicated any opposition to this petition.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None
JAN 2 8 1997
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
,appr0ved,/./but that further same be made
P~,,EPARE~ BY
~J~fA l.~ff~i~ ~1~ O, AICP
~F PLANNER
That Petition PUD-g7-31 (3) having the e~ect of restoring two (2) acres of land zoned C-2 be
a pan ofthe Gadaleta PUD.
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
ROBERT J. MULHERE, AJCP "
CURRENT PLANNIN.~G~tANAGER
DONALD W. Am~OLD, A~CP
PLANNING S~ER,VICES D .E~A'R~.~NT DIRECTOR
'"" \ "',_~
VINCENT A. CAU~'£i~'~, ~D~INIST~'~T. OR
DATE3
DATE
DATE
COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS.
PUD-87-31 (3) EX SUMMARY/pd
2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
OWNER/AGENT:
AGENDA
MEMORANDUM
COLLfER COUNTY PLANNING CONflVffSSION
COMA4UNITY D£VBLO?MENT SERVICES DMSION
DECEMBER $, 1996
PETITION NO:
ITEM ?-D
PUD-87-31 (3), GADALETA PUD AMEND~
Agent:
Community Development and
Environmental Services Division
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
O~,Tler:
Domenico and Angela Gadaleta
572 107' Avenue, North
Naples, Florida 34108
REQUESTED ACTION:
To amend the Cradaleta PUD in response to inquiry that certain errors were made during its
adoption and to restore a former C-2 parcel of land to C-2 but incorporate same in the Gadaleta
PUD.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The Gadaleta PUD is located on the west side of Old U.S. 41 immediately contiguous the Lee
County boundary. .
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
Research on the par~ of staff indicates tha~ a parcel ofland zoned C-2 w~ erroneously included in
the PUD boundary description ~nd m~er plan, and the use of this land convened to residential
purposes and a temporary driving range during a 1989 PUD Amendment. The owner wishes to
have this corrected, by restoring the originally zoned 2 acres of C-2 Commercial Zoning. The
BCC concurred and directed staff'to prepare the subject PUD amendment.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Existing:
Surrounding:
The property currently fim~ions ~s a golf
driving range and is zoned PUD.
North- To the
County boundary line
residential communit'
development.
I
~ a gdlf 7corPse
East - To the east the land is industrially developed
and zoned Industrial.
South -To the south the land is vacant and zoned
PUD.
West -To the west lies the community known as
Sterling Oaks which is actively under
development as a PUD zoning district.
GROWTH M'ANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY:
Commercial zoning is inconsistent with the FLUE. Because of errors in the 1989 amendment
which had the effect of rezoning the C-2 land this C-2 district was not re. evaluated under the
Zoning Re-evaluation Program, nevertheless when staff brought this matter to the BCC's
attention they directed that the error be corrected and that the C-2 zoned area be restored but
made a part of'the Gadaleta PUD.
In any event development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a
concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.1 of the Collier County Land Development
Code, adequate public facilities, at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final
Plat approval, of building permit issuance applicable to this development.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and
archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map.
Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
ANALYSIS:
Ordinance Number 89-84 was adopted on November 28, 1989. This .ordinance amended a
pre, fious ordinance establishing the C-ada/eta PUD, however, it replaced the legal description with
a I _ega{ description that expanded the original 17.28 acre Gadaleta PUD by two (2) additional
acres which were also owned by Mr. Gadaleta, and which 2 acres were contiguous to the original
OadaIeta boundary and at the time was zoned C-2. Investigation by staff, and in particular a
review ofadvenising documents, and the title to the revised C-adaleta PUD failed to identi~y that a
2 acre parcel of land was being rezoned from C-2 to PUD. Clearly, there is no legal
documentation that identifies any intention to rezone the 2 acre parcel that was zoned C-2. The
title to Ordinance Number 89-84 is inconsistent with the legal description, uses of land and master
plan described by the amended PUD language, because the title failed to identify that its action
included rezoning land from C-2 to PUD. We cannot explain these discrepancies. We advised
Mr. Gadaleta that until this matter is resolved we have no alternative as administrators ofzoning
related Ordinances to conclude that we could not honor any claim to allow commercial
development on the former C-2 tract of land. Mr. GadaIeta appealed to staffto seek a resolution
to this opinion by officially and specifically restoring the C-2 zoning classification for the 2 acre
parcel of land. Staff agreed to be the initiator of' this petition in view of the circumstances
surrounding the last amendment in 1989. R{;E~ j;r[~ax
2
JAil 2 8 1997
Staff initiated the process for reconsideration by asking the Board of' Commissioners f.or direction
and advising them of'what has occurred in the course of'amending the Gadaleta PUD. The BCC
directed staff'to prepare an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD which would restore the former C-2
two acres of. commercial zoning however, they also directed staff, to incorporate the commercial
tract in the PUD and its accompanying Master Plan. Therefore, the action before the CCPC is
one which was directed by the BCC, however since this action is tantamount to rezoning land a
recommendation for the CCPC is required.
STAFF RECOM'M'ENDATION~
That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval of Petition PUD-g7-
31. (3) for the purposes of. acknowledging that an error was made when Ordinance 89-84 was
adopted having the efffect of' rezoning two (2) acres of C-2 zoned land and that this land remain
included in the Gadaleta PUD but restored to allow C-2 commercial uses.
AICP DATE
CFI~F PLANNER
RE%~]~V~ED BY:
ROBERT J. MUL~, AICP
CUR. RENT PLUG ~AGER
DON~D W. ~OLD, ~CP
~CE~ k CAIRO, ~~S~TOR
COS~TY DEV. ~ ~O~~ SVCS.
DATE
DATE
DATE
Per,ion Number PUD-87-31 (3)
Sta.ffRepon for J'anuary 2, 1997 CCPC meeting.
NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 21, 1997 BCC meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PL .~OM]VffSSION:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN
PUG 87-31 (3) STAFF REPORT/pal
JAN 2 8 1997
FLORIDA .~.
March 25, 1996
URBAN INSTITUTE, INC.
Or. Neno J. Spegna, AICP, President
38S0 27th Avenue S.W.
Naples, Floddi 33964
Tel. (813) 4SS-2168
Mr. Robert I. Mulhere, AICP
Planning & Technical Services Administrator
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 33942
Re: Oadaleta PUD (Ordinance 89-84)
Dear Mr. ~uihere:
I am wri'tng this Letter in behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Domenico
Gadaleta, o~r=ers of the Gada!e:a PUD in order to request a correction
of what they believe to be an error in ~ he current designation of the
zoning of the northeast portion of the property.
This pro[erty in question .-'as rezoned to Commercial Convenience
District (C 2) by the Board of County Commissioners in 198.1 (Ordinance
84-27c) and has remained thusl.v ever since. It is shown on the current
County Official Zoning Map as part of the Gadaleta PUD rather than as
¢-2°
This change pas made without the knowledge of the Gadaletas and
first came re their attention Then they responded to a letter from
Mrs. Norma ^. Boone dated February 23, 1996 regarding Section 2.7.3.4
of thc Land D~velopment Code (annual report on the progress of
development,. Upon inquiry to Mr. Ron Nine, Mr. Gadaleta ~as informed
that the subject property had been rezoned from C-2 to a part of the
Gadaleta PUD at or about the time that the temporary golf driving
range ~as approved by the County Board of County Commissioners. This
came as a complete surprise to Mr. Gadaleta as he had never requested
such change nor had he ever received any notice from the County of its
intention t~ rezone the property
In re',ie~,ing the records. I cannot find any Justification for the
rezoning of the subject property and can only conclude that an'error
~as made in designating this property as part of the Oadaleta PUD on
the Official Zoning Map. I ~ill addresses this matter more completely
in the summary of this letter.
I ~ent through the County records on March 25, 1996' and again on
garch 26, 1996 to get the background information regarding this matter
and ~ould like to share it vith you.
Exhibit 1.
Application for PUD Amendment, page 1.i specifically
addresses a PUD Amendment/DO Amendment and makes no
reference to a rezone of the subject property.
IpIcasc note: Ail rcfcmccs cited arc n0tcd in )'cRow highlight so they can bc easily
Planned Unit Developments ,. Cm~lX~heftslYt Plant ,. Zoning .. Lind UI~ PI,ti
Transfer of Development Ri,ghtl (TI)R) ·Development. of Re,glonll Iml:mCt
Noo ~
,".,.JAN g 8 1997
I,~... ?
Exhibit 1.
Exhibit i.
Application for PUD Amendment, page 2., paragraph 7 and
8 addresses an amendment only and makes no reference to a
rezone of the subject property.
Application for PUD Amendment, page 6. (temporary golf
driving range layout) addresses an amendment and makes no
reference to a rezone of the subject property.
Exhibit 2.
PUD Document Amendment, cover page, addresses an
amendment to the Gadaleta PUD and makes no reference to a
rezone of the subject property.
Exhibit 2. PUD Document Amendment, Section (3.4.1), page 7. clearly
sets forth the nature of the petition to amend the
Gadaleta PUD Amendment/DO Document to include ~he
temporary use of :he golf driving range and makes no
reference to a rezone of the sublet! property.
Exhibit 2. PUD Document Aaendment, Section ~ of the Table of
Contents addresses the nature of the PUD/DO amendments to
the Gadaleta PUD and makes no reference to a rezone of
the subject property.
Exhibit 2.
PUD Document Amendment, Section 5.7., paragraph C. on
page 14 acknowledges the existence of the C-2 zoning and
makes no reference to a rezone of the subject properly.
Exhibit
Request for Legal Advertising addresses a request for an
amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary golf
driving range but makes no reference to a rezone of the
subject property.
Exhibit
Affidavit of Publication addresses a requesting an
amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary use
permit for a golf driving range but makes no reference to
a rezone of the subject property.
Exhibit 5.
Notification to Adjacent Property Owners addresses a
request for an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a
temporary golf driving range but makes no reference to a
rezone of the subject property.
Exhibit 6.
Notice of Posting specifically addresses "Amending
Gadaleta PUD' but makes no reference to a rezone of the
subject property.
Exhibit 7.
Activity Log & Summary. The Petition Number and the
Petition Type both refer to the Oadaleta petition as a
PDA but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject
property.
Exhibit 8.
official Receipt. The Permit Number and the Reference
Number both refer to the Oadaleta petition as a PUD
Amendment but makes no reference to a rezone of the
subject property.
2
AGE D
JAN 2 8 1997
Exhibit 9. PUD Amendment agreement., paragraph v.. page 3.
acknowledges the C-2 zoning as did Exhibit 2.. preceding.
Exhibit 10. Ordinance 89-8~ throughout, recognizes the petition to
be a request to amend the Gadaleta PUD to allow a
temporary use perntt for a golf driving range.
Tour atten:ion is called to the legal description on
page 2. This legal description was amended from the
original legal description to include the C-2 portion
inasmuch as some of the golf driving range would be
located on it.
It was never the intention of the petitioner to rezone
this C-2 portion as part of the Gadaleta PUD and I
think this is very apparent due to the fact that
nowhere in the petition or its accompanying document is
there any reference to re z.~)ning any of the property for
~hich the temporary use permit for the golf driving
range is aentioned directly or indirectly by citijet lh¢
petitioner nor the County review agencies or its staff.
SUmmARY: Based on the research that I have made concerning this
matter Ca copy of which I aa furnishing you). I am unable to find any
justification for the re-designation of the C-2 property to Oadaleta
PUD on the Official Zoning Map. Inasmuch as the Gadaleta petition
only requested an a=endment to the PUD Document to operate a golf
driving range and did not involve any rezoning, the Oadaletas are at a
loss as to why the re-designation vas necessary or ~hy it was made.
As far as I am able to determine from the records, neither the
property owner nor the public was ever given notice that the County
was contemplating the rezoning of the subject from C-2 to Gadaleta PUD
nor rere any public hearings held before the Collier County Planning
Co=aission or the Board of County Commissioners.
The Gadaletas are anxious to have the Official Zoning Map corrected
to reflect the true C-2 zoning status of the subject property as they
feel that the current zoning indicated on the Official Zoning Map as
'Gadaleta PUD' is incorect and misleading to anyoned having nee~ to
vier the Official Zoning Map.
If you have any further questions concerning this request, please
call me at your pleasure.
Please be assured that the Gadaletas are willing to assist you in
any va}- necessary to correct this matter.
Copy:
Sincerely,
For Domenico and Angela Gadaleta
Domenico and Angela Gadaleta
3
JAN g 8 1997
ORDINAJ~CB NO. 97-
AN ORD]:NANCE AHE~DZNG ORDI'NARCE NU~[BER 88-50, AS AHENDED, GADALETA, A
PL~J~iED UN]:T DEVELOPHENT, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTTON ONE, AHF. J~DHEt~TS TO
CURRENT ZONING SECTION; SECTION TWO, AHENDMENTS TO HASTER PLAN AND
LAND USE SE .CTION; SECTION THREE, AHENDHENTS TO LAND USE REGULATIOtiS
FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SECTION; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECTIVE DATE
amended ~o read as follows:
10 W~EREAS, on Hay 24, 1988, ~-he Board of County Conniss[oners of
11 Collier County, Florida, enacted Ordinance Nunber 88-50, vhich
12 established the Gadaleta Planned Un£t Development (PUD); and
13 ~S, on Nove~er 28, 1989, the Board of County Co~issioners
14 approved Ordinance N~er 88-84, ~hich subse~ently a:ended the
15 Gadale=a P~; and
16 ~S, the Co~uni=y Deve~opmen= and Environ=eh=a! Services
17 Division has advised ~he Board of Coun=y Co~issioners of Collier
1~ Coun=y, Florida, of cer=ain on!ssions ~o procedural
19 a==endan~ ~he adoption of sa~d Ordinance Number 89-84 ~hich are
20 reflec=ed in the anen~en=s se= forth belov;
21 NOW, ~EFORE BE IT O~AI~, by ~he Board of
22 Co~issioners of Collier Coun=y, Florida ~ha~:
23 SE~ION O~= ~E~HE~8 TO C~ ZO~NG SE~ION
24 Sec=ion 1.5 en=l~led "~rren= Zoning" of ~he Gadale=a Planned
25 Development, Ordina~=e No. 88-50, as amended, is hereby amended ~o
26 read as follows:
27 1.5 ~rren~ Zoning
28 A. The then ~rent zoning ~s ~F-6.=='.==cc.~ ~ ~, .... --= A-2
29 A~cultural ~ and C-].
30 SE~ION ~O= ~H~S TO ~ P~ ~ ~ USE SE~ION
31 Section 2.3 en=l~led "Has~ Plan and ~nd Use" of ~e Gadale~a
32 Planned Unit Development, Ordi~ce No. 88-50, as amendS, Is hereby
33
34
Wordme~e~-%t~-e~harm deleted; words und4
PAGE
rlin~ ars &dde~l.
JAN 2 8 1997
,,, .... /0
'7
1
2
3
4
S
6
?
8
10
11
12
13
16
17
2O
21
22
23
2?
28
30
2.3 Master Plan and Land use
~ ~ ...... z-z--lO.~
A. The site plan consists of
~ ...... ~:rc= :..:~ ~9.28 acres of land. ~hich for the ~ur~ose
this p~C) are divided into two tracts. · & B beina 17.28 and 2.0 acres
res~ectivel~,
o-mn =-=~= '--'''-'-- Tract 'A" shall be devoted to residential uses
as hereinafte~ ~scrihed. while tract "S" shall be devoted to
commercial u~ as hereinaffter described.
C. Exhibit "A~. PUD Master Plan. constitutes the re=uired
PUD Development Plan.
SECTZON THREE: A~END~LENTS TO LAND USE REGULXTZONS FOR THE ~UB~£CT
PROP£~TY ~ECTXON
Section 3,2 entitled "Pernitted Principal Uses And Structures" of
the Gadaleta Planned Unit 0evelopment Ordinance No. 85-50, as amended,
is hereby auende~ to read as follows:
3.2 Pernitted Principal Uses and Structures
Tract A
A. No building or structure, or part thereof shall be
erected, altered or used, or land used, An whole or in part,
for other than the following:
1) ~ulti-Family Residences.
2) Group housing, patio housing and cluster housing.
(Development Plan Approval required - see Section 10.5
o! Zoning Ordinance).
3)To~n Houses {Development Plan Approval required -
See Sectiom 10.5 of Zoming Ordinance).
4) Ten (10) percent of the dwelling units constructed
within Parcel "A" as shown on the conceptual maste~
PAGE 2
1
4
~ ' "r" "~ ~ 5
~ ~...~ . ~-. . .~,-~ .
--T .-.:.:,..--:-~. '. -.
16
~_~ ~.,, _.:_ ~. 17
_ ..,
' - -~'~'~"~' ' ~
-. - ' '.'~-~ 2o
2[
· : 22
- : 23
.. . .... ' ....... 24
.... .....=
' - -'~.- '' ~-' '." '
.., 28
-.-~.~ "' ' =~-.~ 2 9
Affordable Housing Section of ~he Comprehensive Plan as vas
agreed to es ·tasult of the approval of Petition R-84-26C.
5) Hodel home un£ts shall be per~itted in con~unction with
the promotion of the development. Such model hone units
shall be converted to residences upon the completion of the
pro~ect unless o~herw~se specifically approved by the
County.
Tract B
~r~ct B shall not exceed an area o~ two acres and may be
developed with any of the uses listed under the C-2 zontna district.
Section 2.2.13.2.1 of the Collier County Land Develooment Co~e~
SECTION FOUR= ZFFECTIVE D~TE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the
Department of State.
PASSED ~ND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Con~issioners of
Collier County, Florida, this __day of , 1997.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY ~OP~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
APPROVED AS TO FORH AND
LEGAl. SUFFICIENCY:
F,~RJORIE N. STUDE24T
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
GADALETA ORDINANCE/17673
32
33
34
Words ~ are deleted; vords underlin:
,JAN 213 1997
EXECL~IVE S~Y
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE JUVENILE
ASSESSMENT CENTER AND SUSPENSION PROGRAM THROUGH
COUNTY DELINQUENCY PREVENTION FINES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 775.0833, FLORIDA STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY
CHAPTER 96-382, LAWS OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR A
MANDATORY COST OF THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) TO BE ASSESSED
AGAINST EVERY PERSON CONVICTED OF A VIOLATION OF A
CRIMINAL STATUTE, A MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY ORDINANCE, OR
A TRAFFIC OFFENSE IN THE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR THE
COURT TO ASSESS THE MANDATORY COST OF $3.00 AND THE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT TO COLLECT THE MANDATORY
COST; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF COSTS AND
DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS BY THE CLERK TO THE SHERIFF;
PROVIDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SHERIFF;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
9]~ That the Board consider adopting an Ordinance to impose
a mandatory cost for the funding of the Juvenile Assessment Center
and Suspension Program pursuant to Section 775.0833, Florida
Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida.
CONSIDERATIONS~ During the 1996 Legislative Session, Chapter
96-382 was enacted and became law on July 1, 1996 that enables a
county to adopt an ordinance imposing a mandatory cost of $3.00
per case to be assessed in specific cases to fund the Juvenile
Assessment Center and Suspension Program.
On November 26, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners directed
the County Attorney to prepare and advertise for public hearing an
Ordinance to impose a mandatory cost for the funding of the
Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program. On January 14,
1997 the Board approved the reconsideration of the ordinance and
directed the ordinance be readvertised for public hearing on
January 28, 1997.
FISCAL IMPACT: By adoption of this Ordinance, there will be no
negative impact. It is estimated that this Ordinance will
generate up to $50,000.00 depending on the interpretation of law
by the Courts.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board consider adopting the attached
Ordinance imposing a mandatory cost of $3.00 per case to be
assessed in specific cases to fund the Juvenile Assessment Center
and Suspension Program.
' ' Weigel
County Attorney
Date:
r / AGENDA]TEN~
Jm] 2 19':t7
I
Pg.,
CLERK []g COUi~l S
Fax:941-//b-2/55 Dec b '~7o lo:zu
COLLIER COUNTY JU¥~Nrr.E .,A~SESSI~ENT CENTER
INT~RAG£NCY AGI~EM~NT
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the State of Florida, Department
of Juvenile Justice, District Eight; the Colli~ County Courts; the Collier County Clerk of the
Court; the Collier County Sheriff, and the Collier County Juvenile Justice Council, Inc.
WB:Ea~AS, all parties are committed to!tproviding appropriate programs and services to
prevent children from becoming at risk and tO. intervene with children already involved in the
juvenile justice system; and
WImREAS, thc parties to this Agreement desire a maximum degree of cooperation and
planning in order to provide for the safety and security of the community and its children; and
WEEILEm, during the 1996 Florida Legi.slative Session, Chapter 96-0382 was enacted and
became law on ~Iuly I, 1996; adding Florida Statvte, Section 775.0833, and
WH:I~R~S, Section 775.0833 of thc Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part:
'(1) A county may adopt a man,datory cost to bc assessed in specific eases by
incorporating by reference the prov. isions of this section in a county ordinance. Prior
to thc adopuon cf the county ordinance, the sheriff's office of the county must be
a partner irt a ~ritter, Agreemeht with the Department of luvenile Justice to
participate in a juveaoJe assessment center or with the district school board to
participate in a sospc~sion program.
(2)...the court shall assess court .costs of $3 per case, in addition to any other
authorized cost or fi,re, on every person who, with respect to a charge, indictment,
prosecution ;:ommenced, or petition of delinquency filed in that county or circuit,
pleads guilty, r~olo cont..nde, re to, or is convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for,
or has an ~tdjt~dication withheld for, a felony~misdemeanor, or a criminal traffic
offense or ha~ndicapped parking ,violation under state law, or a violation of any
municipal or county ordinance, if the violation constitutes a misdemeanor under state
law."
and;
WimgF..iS, the Collier County Iuvcn~.e Justice Council, Inc., through its Juvenile
Assessment Center Advisory Committee, and pursuant to Section III C. 19. and Appendix 7 of
thc Collier County Juvenile Justice Council, Inc. Comprehensive Plan approved in December
of 1994 and amended in Jaly of 1996, and in fxmjunction with the State of Florida Department
of Juvenile Justice, District Eight, is developing a luvenile Assessment Centex program for
Collier County to be loc~ texl adjacent to the CoLlier County Jail in the Yuvenile Detention Center
to be constructed by the State of Florida, De~.'artment of Juvenile Iusfice; and
AG ENDAxI"[E'.t ,
.o. J
Pi[.--' .-
WHr~EAS, me Sheriff of Collier Coun!~ is a participant in thc Collier County luvenil¢
Iustice Council Suvenile Assessment Center , visory Board; and
w~, the panics hereto have r~uested the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida to authorize the Colli&' County Couru through the Collier County Clerk
of Courts to impose a mandatory court cosi of Thre~ and 00/100 Dollars ($3.00) per case
authorized by and pursuant to Section 775.0~33 of the Florida Statues; and
WI-I:E~AS, the parties hereto wish to p ,rovide for the use and disposition of said funds so
Wmi~t,v./,s, all parties mutually agree that all obligations stated or implied in this
A§reement shall be interpreted in light of, and consistent with, governing state and federal laws;
Now, TImREFORE in consideration of ithe following agreements, the parties do hereby
covenant and agra: to the following:
1. This Agreement shall be in effect'as of the date the Agreement is signed by the last
of the parties hc-reto.
2. Upon and aftr..r approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, as provided above, said ~unds collected by the Collier County Clerk of the
Court pursuant to Section 775.0833 of thc Florida Statutes and Resolution of the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, will be: held in a
designated account for said funds'to be established by the Collier County Clerk of
Court.
3. Said funds shall be disbursed by .thc Collier County Clerk of Court to the Collier
County Sheriff for implementation and operational needs of the Collier County
luvenile Assessment Center.
4. Modification of this Agreement shall be made only by a written document s:tting
forth the modifications, signed bY all parties hereto.
5. All panics to this Agreement acknowledge that this Agreement does not preclude or
· I
preempt each of the parties hereto, individually entering into an Agreement with one
or mo~ parties to this Agreement or other parties outside of this Agreement. Such
agreements shall not nullify the force and effect of this Agree-merit.
IN WrrNF..ss WHEREOF, the parties h .eTeto have set their hands and seals on the day and
yem' set forth herein.
STAT~ OF FLOR/DA, DEPAR~ OF
~ mS~C~, Dm~.~CT ~G~rr
D~: Nov~nb~'. , 1996
Edw'~rd '~Jl~" Buff
DL~trlct Eight, District l~m~§er
COLLIER COUNTY IUVENILE
COb'NCIL, INC.
Dart. d: November_ , I996
-3-
D~ttcd: November.~, 1996
Dat~xi: Novcmbcr.~, 1996
Dated: November~, 1996
COLI..~COUNTYC~OFCOURT
W-~ht ~Bmck,
COLLIER COUNTY CIRCUTI'COURT
Baker, Administrative Judge
COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
D o n"n"TZ~ tr~.,~ h e rk ff
t4o.~/
3;,?i 2 ~6 ~S37
1
2
4
6
?
9
10
11
ORDIN~J~CE NO. 97-__
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FUNDXNG FOR THE
PROGRAH TEROUGH COUNTY DELINQUENCY PREVENTION
FXNEB PURSUAA'T TO SECTION ?75°0833; FLORIDA
STATUTES, AS ANENDED BY CHAPTER 96-302; hAWS
OF FLORIDA; PROVXDXNG FOR A HAlqDATORY COST OF
THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST
EVERY PERSON CONVICTED OF & VIOLATION OF A
CRIXIN~J, STATUTE, A NUNICIYAL OR COUNTY
ORDINANCE, OR A TR3~FIC OFFENSE IN TEE
COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR THE COURT TO ASSESS THE
MAJ~DATORY COST OF $3.00 ~tNDTHE CLERK OF THE
CIRCUIT COURT TO COLLECT THE MANDATORY COST;
PROVIDING FOR %'HE COLLECTION OF COSTS AND
DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS BY THE CLERK TO THE
8HERIFF; PROVIDING THE REHPONSIBILZTZES OF
THE SHERIFF; PROVIDING FOR CONFLZCT AND
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE
CODE OF LAWS ~ND ORDINANCES; kND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
12 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
13 Florida, ts authorized pursuant to Section 775.0833, Florida
14 Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida, to adopt
15 a mandatory court cost of three dollars ($3.00) per case on every
16 person who, with respect to a charge, Indictment, prosecution
17 commenced, or petition of delinquency filed in the county or
18 circuit court, pleads guilty, nolo contenders to, or is convicted
19 of, or adjudicated delinquent for, or has an adjudication withheld
20 for, a felony or misdemeanor, or a criminal traffic offense or
21 handicapped parking violation under state law, or a violation of
22 any municipal or county ordinance, if the violation constitutes a
23 misdemeanor under state law; and
24 WHEREAS, Section 775.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by
25 Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida, provides that the Clerk of the
26 Court shall collect and deposit the assessments collected pursuant
27 to said Statute in an appropriate, designated account established
28 by the Clerk, for disbursement to the Sheriff as needed for the
29 implementation and operation of s Juvenile assessment center or
30 suspension program so long as the Sheriff's office is a partner in
31 the juvenile assessment center or suspension program; and
32
33
WHEREAS, Section ?75.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by
Chapter 96-382~ Laws of Florida, requires the Sheriff's Office of
2
the County to be a p~-trmr in & written aqreeeent with the
3
Department of Juven~.le .~stice to participate in a ~uvenlle
4
assessment center or with the district school board to participate
5
in a suspension program~ and
6
WHEREAS, the She~if~ of Collier County is a partner in the
?
operation of the J.~,~'~e Assessment Center pursuant to Section
~9.0471~ Florida StuLo~$, throuqh the written aqreement with the
Department of Juvenile Justice, and is a partner in a suspension
10
proqram developed In con~unction with tbs school board of Collier
11
County; and
12
~HEREAS, the Clerk of the County and Circuit court is
authorized to collec~, deposit and disburse the assessments
14
collected into and out of the desiqnated account pursuant to
15
Section 775.08~3, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-~81,
16
Laws of Florida.
17
NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
18
COP~ilS$ION£RS OF COtl,IEh COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
19
S~C~IO~ O~a. ls~essssnt of Court Costs.
20
The court shall a.;sess court costs of throe dollars ($3.00)
21
per cass, in additto~ tc any other authorized cost or fine, on
22
every person who, w~th respect to a charqe, indictment,
2~
prosecution commen,~.~, .' petition of delinquency flied in the
24
county or circuit court, pleads 9uilty, nolo contenders to, or is
convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for, or has an
16
adiudicatton wlthhelo fo~, a felony or misdemeanor, or a criminal
~7
traffic offense or ta~dt~:apped parklnq violation under state
or a violation of any m,mlclpal or county ordinance, if the
violation constitutes a misdemeanor under state law.
~0
S~CTIO~ ~10. Collsctloe of Costs and ~lsburssaeat of Funds
by t~e Clerk.
32 The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall collect the three
33 dollars ($3.00) cour~ costs assessed by the court and deposit
those funds in an appropriate, designated account established by
the Clerk. Pursuant to Section ?75.0833, Florida Statutes, the
2
Clerk shall be entitled to five percent (St) of the assessments
3
collected for the costs of administering the collection of
4
assessments. The Clerk shall disburse funds to the Sheriff as
5
needed for the implementation and operation of the Collier County
Juvenile Assessment Center and/or Suspension Programs.
?
8
The Sheriff shall request funds from the Clerk as needed to
9
support the implementetion and operation of the Colller County
Juvenile Assessment Center or Suspension Programs. The Sheriff
11
shall account for all funds that have been deposited into the
12
designated account by August i annually in a vritten report to the
County Juvenile Justice Council. The sheriff may also deposit any
14
other funds obtained by that office for the implementation or
1S
operations of the Juvenile Assessment Center into the designated
16
account for disbursement to the Sheriff as needed.
17
SECTION FOUR. Conflict and Beverabllity.
18
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other
ordinance of Collier County or other applicable lay, the more
20
restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
22
competent ~urisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate,
23
distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not
24
affect the validity of the rsmaintng portion.
SECTXON ,lVl. Inclusion in the Code of Lays and Ordinances.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be Lade a
27
part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County,
28
Florida. The sections of the Ordinance Lay be renumbered or
29
relettered to accomplish such, and the word 'ordinance' Lay be
30
chanqed to 'section', "article~, or any other appropriate word.
32
33
I
This Ordinance ahall become effective upon filing this
Ordinance w~th the Department of Stats. Collection by the Clerk
of the Court of the $3.00 m&ndatory court cost az described In
thle Ordinance ahall commence on February 1~ 1997.
PASSED AND DUlY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissionera
of CoIlier County, Florida, thai day off ,
?
1997.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COHNISSIONERS
9 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLL~K COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA
10
BY:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2?
28
29
30
31
32
33
Approved es to form and
legal sufficiency:
David -C. We~iqe/~
County Attorne~
TIHOTH¥ L. HANCOCK, CHAI~N
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION NO. DRI-96-1, ALAN R. REYNOLDS, AICP, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON &
PEEK, INC., REPRESENTING SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OF "ISLAND WALK" A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT CONTAINING A MAXIMUM OF 2,100 MIXED DWELLING UNITS;
RECREATIONAL , OPEN SPACE, AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ELEMENT, A "TOWN
CENTER" PROVIDING RETAIL, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES; AND
MULTIPbRPOSE GREEN SPACE LOCATED ON VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (C.R. $62)
BETWEEN INTERSTATE 75 AND C.I~ 951, MORE SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING ALL OF
SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 34,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF 705 + ACRES. (COMPANION TO PUD-96-14)
OBJECTIVE:
Pursuant to State Statute this petition seeks approval of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
Development Order.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Island Walk development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include
both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of
Island Walk is an internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space, and community
service element, consisting of a large lake and green space network that links ali residential
neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town Center will
provide many retail, recreational, and community services and facilities that support the needs of Island
Walk residents and guests, including community meeting rooms, central postal fadlity, neighborhood
retail goods and services including a restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpo~
green space.
An impact assessment of the Island Walk DRI has been prepared as required by Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes. The DRI assessment is largely based on information supplied in the Application for
Development Approval (ADA). The ADA represents a Comprehensive Analysis ora defined ntnnber of
questions required by administrative rules that identify the impact of the development upon a ~de range
physical, natural, economic and social issues. The ADA in its entirety incttgrmg t~o adff~kx~
sufficiency responses to evaluation criteria was reviewed by all lurisdictional state agencim inclining
the southwest Florida Water Management District, Southwest Regional Plarming Councal ~ and
local jurisdictional staff' personnel.
JAN 2 8 1997
This process concludes with a report of, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning council's official
recommendation. These recommendations address each of' the evaluation criteria required by
administrative rules and chapter 380, Florida Statutes. These include Energy, Historical/archaeological,
Housing, Hurricane Evacuation/Flood plans, Vegetation and Wildlif,e/Wetlands,
Solid/H~Tsrdous/Medical Waste, Storm management, Transportation, Wastewater Management/Water
Supply, Consistency with Local Comprehensive Plan and General Considerations. These
recommendations are then included in the Development Order crafted for local approval. The
recommendations were reviewed and approved by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council on
~ovembe~' 21. 1996 and conveyed to official representatives of.Collier County.
The Development Order submitted to staff, upon review includes all of the regionally significant
SWFRPC Official Recommendations. It should be appreciated that the DRI Development only
addresses regional impacts, however, all DRI Development Orders are concurrently processed with a
rezoning application, typically in the f,orm of, a Planned Unlt Development (PUD). Three persons
addressed the Commission expressing certain reservations. Copies of' correspondence is included with
this executive summary.
All community facility and service providers were offered an opportunity to review the Island Walk
ADA and to advise staff if, there were any issues within their jurisdiction that required us to seek a
development commitment over and above what has been provided in the ADA and the Final
Development Order. We received no requests to go beyond the commitment made in the Development
Order or that run contradictory to the responses made in the ADA relative to any particular community
service.
The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on December 19, 1996 and unar.;.mously
voted to recommend approval to the Board of'County Commissioners.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This petition by and of itself, will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment
achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been
approved will result in a future fiscal impact on County public fadlities. The County collects impact
fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on
public f,acilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element
needed to maintain adopted levels of service for public facilities. In the event that impact fee collections
are inadequate to maintain adopted levels of service, the County must provide supplemental funds f,rom
other revenue sources in order to build needed f,acilities.
With Developments of Regional Impact the owner entity responsible f,or the DRI is required to mitigate
regional impacts and to pay f,or proportionate shares of'transportation improvements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
Analysis of this petition as presented and as structure,~
reaching a conclusion that its approval is consistent with
2
hy it~ PUD regulator7
JAN 2 8 1997
do
The entire site is located in the Urban Residential designated area, therefore, given availability of
supporting infrastructure and market justification its to be expected that authorization would be granted
for residential development. Specific provision is made in the FLUE to the OMP for neighborhood
commercial centers functioning as an integral part ora large residential development.
Development permitted by the approval of' this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under
the provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24 at the earliest or next to occur of
either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this
development.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and
archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no
Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition DRI-96-1, as described by the drat~
Development Order Resolution and Exhibits thereto.
RONALD NINO, AICP DATE
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
ROB~RT J. MULHERE, AICP DATE
CURRENT Pfi.,ANNI~G MANAGF~ ~"-~,
DONAL~,~W. ARNOLD, AICT OA~
,. C, eO, ,O s ToR
DKI-96-1 EX SUMMARY/pd
3
JAN 2 8 1997
e=. ..~ · ~'=. '"' ~ I
AGENDA ITEM 7-E
MEMORANDUM
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLUG COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
DATE:
NOVEMBER 27, 1996
RE: PETITION NO:
DRI-96-1, ALAN R. REYNOLDS AICP, OF WILSON,
MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., REPRESENTING
SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OF THE
"ISLANDWALK" A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IA/PACT CONTAINING A MAXIMUM OF
2.100 .~flXED DWELLING UNITS; RECREATIONAL,
OPEN SPACE, AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
ELE~fEN'I'; A 'TOWN CENTER' PROVIDING RETAIL,
RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES;
AND MULTIPURPOSE GREEN SPACE LOCATED ON
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (C.R. 862) BETWEEN
INTERSTATE 75 AND C.R. 95 I, MORE
SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING ALL OF SECTION 33,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND PART
OF SECTION 34, TOWNSI-iZP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF 705 + ACRES. (COMPANION TO PUD-96-14
ISLANrDWALK)
OWNER/AGENT:
Agent:
Mr. Alan D. Re)molds, AICP
W'dson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc.
3200 Ba~ley Lane, Suite 200
Naples, Florida 34105
OWTleI'.'
Suneo Building Corporation
3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension
Naples, Florida 34199
No. ~,,)
JAN 2 8 1997
--~"~AG£N O& I'[EM
Pl.
REOUESTED ACTION;
This petition seeks approval of a DRI Development Order pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida
Statutes and Chapter 28-24, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The term "Development of
Regional Impact", means any development which, because of its character, magnitude, or
location, would have a substantial effect upon the health, safety or welfare of citizens of more
than one county. Fixed thresholds are used to determine when a project rises to a Development
of Regional Impact. For Collier County the threshold is 1000 or more housing units, lslandwalk
is a project of 2100 housing units.
JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW BODIES:
Developments of Regional Impact are concurrently reviewed by both the local government and
the Regional Planning Council. The Regional Planning Council serves to coordinate the review of
state and federal jurisdictional agencies. This review concludes with the Regional Planning
Councils recommendations for conditions of approval that should be included in the Development
Order which is adopted by Collier County. Both the Regional Planning Council and Department
of Community Affairs may appeal a Development Order which is inconsistent with their
recommendations.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The area embraced by the lslandWalk community is in the entire section 33, and part of Section
34, Township 48 south, Range 26 East. The land fronts upon the north side of Vanderbilt Beach
Road having in excess of mile of road frontage. (See location map following page).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
The IslandWaik development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to
include both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal
point of IslandWalk is an internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space, and
community service dement, consisting of a large lake and green space network that links all
residential neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center." The
Town Center will provide many retail, recreational and community services and facilities that
support the needs of IslandWalk residents and guests, including community meeting rooms,
central postal facility, neighborhood retail goods and sen'ices including a restaurant, a recreation
and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green space.
JAN g 8 1997
By including a variety of services and facilities that meet the daily needs of residents within a short
walking distance of their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of demand for
automobile trips within and beyond the community, and greater interaction and communication
between residents. Inclusion of these land uses fi~rthers the Collier County goals on encouraging
mixed uses and reducing impacts associated with new development.
The project is planned to be constructed in one six-year phase, with construction anticipated to
commence in 1997, and be completed in the year 2002. Tl~s dates are estimates and actual
occurrences will be governed by market conditions and economic conditions beyond the control
of the applicant.
Proposed Land Use Total Acreage Distribution at Build Out
LAND USE
Residential
Town Center
Lakes
Right-of-Way
Cypress
Freshwater Marsh
Willow Marsh
Open Space
TOTAL SITE
APPROXI2~TE ACRES
363.0
15.0
171.0
51.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
103.0
705±
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLAN~"~G (~OUN(~IL REVIEW:
An impact assessment of the IslandWalk DR/has been prepared as required by Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes. The DR/assessment is largely based on information supplied in the Application
for Development Approval (ADA). The ADA represents a Comprehensive Analysis of a defined
number of questions required by administrative rules that identify the impact of the development
upon a wide range physical, natural, economic and social issues. The ADA in its entirety
including two additional sufficiency responses to evaluation criteria was reviewed by all
jurisdictional state agencies including the Southwest Florida Water Management District,
Southwest Regional Planning Council staff, and local jurisdictional staffpersonnel.
JAN 2 8 1991
. n. '7
\ AGENDA ITEM
This process concludes with a report of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Councirs official
recommendation. These recommendations address each of the evaluatiov criteria required by
administrative rules and chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Thee include Energy,
Historical/A~chaeologica], Housing, Hurricane Evacuation/Flood plains, Vegetation and
Wildlife/Wetlands, SolicVHa~'-rdous/Medical Waste, Stormwater Manager~,~.nt, Transportation,
Wastewater Management/Water Supply, Consistency with Local Compr~;hensive Plan and
General Considerations. These recommendations are then included in th~ Development Order
crafted for local approval. The recommendations were reviewed and appro', ~.d by the Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council on November 21, 1996 and conveyed to official
representatives of Collier County.
ISLANDWALK DRI-DEVELOPMENT ORDER:
The Development Order submitted to staff, upon review includes all of the regionally significant
SWFRPC Official Recommendations. It should be appreciated that the DP] Development only
addresses regional impacts, however, all DRI Development Orders are concurrently processed
with a rezoning application, typically in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
The concurrent rezoning action addresses local concerns and conditions of approval. The
Development Order also ties the PUD regulatory document into its applicable regulatory
framework by citing the PUD as being a pan of the Development Order Therefore, with the
passage of both the Development Order (DR.I) and the PUD regulatory document we have
development approvals spanning both regional impacts and local require,-,~.:!t', for consistency
with the GMiP and LDC. It should also be noted that many regional condi:ioq~ of approval also
address local requirements such as environmental preservation and enhancement, transportation
and storm water management in panicular. In these cases the regional condition is all inclusive of
local requirements for GMP consistency and LDC r .egulations.
Local Development Issues - Traditionally, DILl Development Orders include provisions for
community facilities and services such as schools, public parks, fire stations, police services and so
forth. With the advent of impact fees for each and everyone of these fa,..ii;~cs and services the
need to reserve space or otherwise extract a financial commitment diminished allowing greater
flexibility in terms of sites to insure that a site for a given community fac;hty was in the best
location. In the past, and in the absence of impact fees, sites were chosen t:.at ~vere less optional
in terms of location simply because it was expedieat to require an allocaticr, o:"space. Examples
of this situation include school sites in Pelican Bay, and Marco Shores that did not fit with
optimum locations. With the payment of impact fees those jurisdictional agencies now have more
freedom to pick the best sites for the least amount ofdollars.
All community facility and service providers w~e offered an opportunity to review the
lslandWalk ADA and to advise stalTifthere were any issues within their jurisdiction that required
us to seek a development commitment over and above what has been pro:'ided in the ADA and
the Final Development Order. We received no requests to go beyond the commitment made in
the Development Order or that run contradictor)' to the responses made in the ADA relative to
any particular community service.
AGENDAITEM~ .
JAN 2 8 1997
TAFF RE MME DA ·
That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval of Petition DRI-96-
1, IslandWalk as described by the Development Order Resolution.
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
ROBERT J. MULl[ERE, AICP
CUP, RE~ PLUG MAN~.GE_g_ .
DONALD~W. ARNOLD, AICP'
G SERVICES DF,,PT~TMENT DIRECTOR
CEI~r A. CAUTERO, ADMINI$'I'~TOR
COMMUNITY DEV. AND EN'VIRONMENTAL $VC$.
DATE
DATE
Petition Number DRI-g&.I
StaffReport for December 19, 1996 CCPC meeting.
NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 10, 1996 BCC meeting
COLLIER COUNTY PL~CO~SSION:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN
DRI-96-1 STAFF REPORT/ixl
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
2740 Centerview Drive - Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
RPM-BSP-ADA-I
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
UNDER SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES
PART I. Application Information.
I, Michael D. Rosen . the undersigned officer of Suneo Building_ Co~oration,
hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact ns defined in Section
380.06, Florida Statutes fi. SO, and Chapter 28-24, Florida Administrative Code
(F.A.C.). In support thereofl submit the following information concerning
lslandWalk . which information is true and correct to the best of my
'knowledge.
(date)
Mic/l(ael D. Rosen_, Vice President
Suhco Bm'lding Corporation
JAN 2 8 1997
~AG£ND& IT. EM.
December 18, 1996
Collier County Planning Commission
2g00 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Dear Commission Members:
As a property owner which directly adjoins the proposed Island Walk PUD, I have many
concerns regarding the proposed project. In lieu of representing myself as an hysterical
property owner, I have reached to individuals that are professionals in the field to assist
me in presenting my concerns.
Although John Bolt of Storm Water Management may disagree, you must first be brought
up to date on easement improvemen~ w:,ich are currently taking place on the 30 feet
drainage easement which adjoins both m), property and the proposed Island Walk
property.
As you will see with miscellaneous correspondence that has been attached, the C6unty
las represented this drainage improvement as "existing ditch maintenance." I met with
Mr. Clayton Miller on site ofthls prejec~. ~is morning and we walked the entire project
together. Neither myselfnor Mr. Miller ever discovered any sign within the 9,000 feet
project of an existing ditch measu~ ~ ~'ee~ h~ depth, with a 4 feet width and an eight feet
height. It is apparent, and yet to be ,~,,~:.~ ,i d~.~ Collier County represented the ditch
which presently exists on the Harvt:~, Bro,.~ Farm. property. South Florida Water
Management is reviewing the on going 5rojee~ for possible misrep~tation and/or
exemption due to the size of the projecL ~ have, been assured that a written response will
be forth coming from South Florida ~ ater Management which will be available for the
hearing before the Board OfCount~ Couu~tissioners. Had this been permitted with an
Environmental Review, this report co',,dd have impact on the existing Site proposal. We
do have, environmentally and habitat sensitive forested edge to the westerly boundary of
the proposed Island Walk.
As you will see by the correspondenc~ that has been included from Klm Dryden of
Florida Game and Fish as well as Mi. Gar:~ Beardsley of Tropical Environmental
Consultants, the Cousity through .~h,~ chainage ;.mprovement efforts has destroyed
approximately 6+ acres of Big Cypre.-.s Fox Squierel Habitst which adioined the
on thc westerly boundary of the Farm will again remove ~[dditi
JAN 8 1997
the recommendation of both Florida Game and Fish and Gray Beardsley, that any
remaining native vegemion on the existing d~ burrn be preserved and that native Florida
plants replace the Brazilian Pepper that is presently in existence.
As you see by the enclosed Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat Plan which has been
finalized by Pelican Strand, construction activity is prohibited within 100 feet of an active
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nest, and native vegetation is to be preserved.
Given the existing Site Plan, a 20 feet buffer is proposed and then the 30 feet easement
for the future Logan Boulevard. As is recommended in the report from Gary Beardley, a
100 feet buffer from Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nests is again reiterated in the
Consu'uction Requirements within the Pelican Su'and Managemem Plan. Kim Dryden
has indicated in her correspondence that the 20 feet proposed Buffer has little to no value
in the protection of habitat. Given the guidelines that are documented in Plans
throughout 12 Developments within Collier County, the Site Plan needs to allow for a t
least a 100 feet Buffer within the existing native vegetation and forested edge to assure
the future protection of active nests against disturbance of n-affic and development.
In spe 'aking with Dr. Stephen Humphries at the University in Gainesville and the
Graduate Student that is presently documenting Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat on the
Hole In The Wall, Royal Poinciana and Wilderness Golf Courses, we may not be able to
maintain the existing BCFS Colony within Units 96 and 97 because of the surrounding
proposed developments. But to put it in their words, and in full agreement, it is definitely
worth a shot!
In addition, the presence of Deer, Bobcat and Fox in our area raises another concern. The
Site proposal has eliminated any future corridor for the movement of wildlife.
Th~s Site Plan, if accepted, will be close the corridor between Unit 96 and Unit 95
(which border the Vineyards to the East) which presently allows wildlife to cross
Vanderbilt Beach extension and to continue moving within protective cover.
In addition, with the recent loss of the forested buffer for the installation of the drainage
ditch, with the proposed Logan Boulevard extension, you have just placed a sense of
condemnation on the property owners that adjoin the development. The setback
requirements under the Estates District is 10% ofthe lot width or 15 feet, whichever is
less. Please be advised that in some existing situations, you will be placing residential
improvements within 65 feet ofthe proposed Logan Boulevard. Let it also be known that
by the proposals within this PUD/DRI and the defining of this Easement of the proposed
Logan Boulevard, you have now placed property owners in the legal position of
disclosure of this proposal on the future sale on their property. In speaking with Collier
County Roads, the proposal to extend Logan Boulevard is not on the five year plan So
therefore, I am disclosing an "unknown" for at least five years.
.as a real estate sale professional in Florida, I have reac
to assist in estimating of just how much value I am losi~
led to
g in
JAil 2 8 1997
L_..",. _
~p]
dc
· AGEND& ITEM
proposed Site Plan. We are raking into consideration the recent easement improvements,
the 20 feet buffer and the proposed Logan Boulevard e~ension or the legal need to
disclose the same. DOn .lohnson has assured me that there is sufficient hi~orical data to
accomplish this task. I am also advising those neighbors whereby their improved
s-u-uctures will be within 65 feet of the proposed Logan to have the same Appraisal
review completed. The Site Plan is impactinl~ my values less than mos~ as I chose to
build my main residence to the Wes~ of my 4.6/acre Trac~. My own appraisal will not be
an accurate estimation in comparisons to others property owners.
If Logan Boulevard is no longer being considered by the County, then an official letter
from the Collier County Government needs to be issued to ALL
HOMEOWNERSFLANDOWNERS on the Easterly Boundary of Unit 96 and 97 that this
road improvement is not going to happen to eliminate fl~e legal need of disclosure. I have
enclosed a letter from Attorney John White which addresses the issue of disclosure based
upon the present Site Plan.
In addition, a copy of the PUDfDRI Maps which indicate future Logan Boulevard
through to the County Line have been forwarded to the Homeowner Associations of Long
Shore Lakes, Quail Creek, Quail West and Worthington Country Club. If the setting of
this easement is con.f'umation of Logan Boulevard being the new consideration in a
north/south corridor, I think their input at the County Commission Meeting for approval
of this development is also warranted.
The last issue that I would like to bring to you attention is road impact. It is proposing
that a traffic light is to be installed at the south entrance to Oakes Boulevard off of
Vanderbilt Beach Extension. The present speed limit on Oakes Boulevard, a co~dor
which runs north and south in a residential neighborhood, is at present 45 MPH. This is
the same speed limit that is on Immokalee Road! Ifyou are considering this travel speed
in any traffic assessment, you need to be informed that it is the intention of the
Homeowners within Units 96 and 97 to petition the County to reduce this speed limit to a
mi~mum of 30 MPH. Orange Blossom which connects Airpor~ Pulling to Goodlette-
Frank Road is no different than Oakes Boulevard. The speed limit on that artery is
30MPH.
Respec/t~lly submitted,
Cathy Graves~roperty Owner
$630 16"' Avenue, NW
Naples, Florida 34119
(941) 591-2922
JAN 2 8 1997
COLLIER COUN
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
May 8, 1996
Dear Collier Cbunty Property Owner:
3301 g TAMIAMI TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 33962
(941) 732.2575
FAX (941) 732-2526
A CF.~TIF'IED DL.~"[ CI lip
On behalf of the Collier County Stormwater Management
Department, please be advised that drainage improvements are
scheduled in your area. All construction will take place within
the Collier County 30 feet drainage easement along the east edge
of Golden Gate Estates Units 96 and 97. The improvements will
include clearing the easement and constructing a shallow
conveyance ditch to the south connecting to the Vanderbilt Beach
Road canal. This project is being undertaken as a result of the
flooding your area experience in past years, especially during
1995. By providing a positive outfall route for excess runoff,
-this project should improve the area's, drainage capabilities
although it is not a sure-fix, i
Thank you in advance for your patience as we undertake these
improvements. If you have any questions please feel free to
call this office at (941) 732-2501 or the Engineering
Consultant, Richard McCormick, P.E., of Wilkison & Associates,
Inc., at (941)643-2404.
Very truly yours,
John H. Boldt, P.E.,P.L.S.
Stornwater Management Director
JHB/mts
CC:
Thomas E. Conrecode, P.E., Public Works Administrator
George F. Archibald, P.E., Transportation Department Director
Richard McCormick, P.E., Wilkison & Associates, Inc.
Doc: 10107
JAN 2 8 1997
14--
CON 24.06
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
M~et Bi.shop, SupervisLa~ Professional, Fort Myers Service Cemer,
Field E~gineerir,,g Division, Rel~ladoz~ Department
4~lerry Kur, z, Area E~eer, Collier County, Field £niineerint Division,
Ret'uladon Depzr~ent
DATE: .laa-,uary $, 1996
SUB.~ECT: E.~'J~g Ditch Mzlmenmce
Eat of O~ B~le,~d
~ilier Coun~
S~c~o~ 29 & ~2/To~p 48/R~g~ 26
Cc~er Co~ S~ re~es~ed o~ ~ce ~ e~u~flon o~ · proposed ~
¢le.n{~ led~ ~e ~h ~ lo.ted lppro~tely' one (1) ~e
(2) ~]~. ~e site ~ ~p~ed on Oaober 1~ 199~. ~e &ich = appro=at~y ~o (2)
~o uhree (3) feet ~eep ~ a fo~ (4) f~t bosom ~d~ ~d ~ e~ht (g) f~t
VegetAtion ~o~ i~ ~e ditch ~ si~~ co~g ~inly of Bra~ PepS.
~ proposed ~tch m~te~ ~ h~lp relieve som~ s~eel ~d ~d
O~ Boule~d. ~e ~ich ~ l~ed in a ~F dr~ge e~eme~c B~
memo to Co~er Co~ ~~ce Se~ce~ ~eld E~ee~g a~o~e~g~
At~ched: SFWMD DJ[ch Cle--~nlng snd M::~!ntenanco. Su~esdons
Clycle..Fu§a~¢, Collier: .CouatT. Complla~co:S~wi~s
Stan Chr~nowsld, Colli¢i' County Plan Review
F.E. File, Naples
AG£~ID_A J:TIr~ x
.o.
JAN 2 8 1997
AGE:ND&
P. 02/05
8:51
PUELIC bl3~l, iS DIVISI~ Fax:941?~22526 Dec !$ '96
~es Chic are currinc~7 me,dated by Flori~i ~lJc:ac~ve Codes
State Statutes.
Zn cues where chi cleaning or
~ ce~it~, ch, District hi~l~ ,=couraBaJ l~,cs/mavaCocs Co
this ~th chi District's Field lep~asenc/cives'prio~ co
chi lcc~ cle~ing/uaceuuc, icCiviC~. .dso, prior to ~iCilCing such
the ~oilo~
a)
· location ekscch/s~p tdinc~.(7~-_- th- ~p~.c.t~:l~. location and th.
f[e~eacl7 is the e~stest ~hod ~ot td~ these a~e~-.)
with t~e current amd proposed final widths,
tlJN~ciovs i~dir, aced.
C)~c. ch. above imfor~acioa is available. Disc[icc staff will be f~ CO meet
~th ~[e proposing ~t cleaning activin. Is ~r~oad ~1~. to ~l~sl
it. Either a verbal ~ledie~nc of the upc~; cl.ui~[ ~i1 ~ five=
oc ~u~her t~o~cion ~uld be requested, l~ necessa~, Co c~ri~y the tu~l
ic~e o~ the proposed worE.
l'ae rolls-nS guidelin~s should always be folloved [eSarti~g all
.1.
]tt~Cena::~/~xcavaC~m mtsc be L~uLcid to the
us deeper chs:: the ~rerqe depth of .a~Jcsu~ sc
pl~C rooC zone.
c~ssn~u~/ma~nCenLuce effort. ·
Ptq~.iC WOP~,S DIVI$I~ Fax:9417322526 Dec 18 'g6 8:51 P. 05/05
PA~E 2
Y. Io oC~r m~r£ace v~eLr aLU~~ CO~CXuCC~m OC r~ ac?~v~7
c~u occu~ ~2ehouc pr~or proper ~ppr~vLtCs) £r~m e~_; ~L~tT~cC.
8. A~y p~Ulp~uI of Tater u#cc~tce~ v~Ch ~ ~k
Even Chou~ ~e D~sCr~cc enc~rases chis
~ ~canc U~er o~ people do ~r.~...,:~nd e~e~e~e
c~s ~ o~ york. -3 ..... ; ~caed chi ~lov~le horde for
'~ere~ort, lc ~ i~enc upon eye.one doin[ chis
~ch~ ~lovable bou~e or risk be~[ cited by e~. DisCricc's
Sicclon. Zf cited for a 'Surface Vicar ~g~enc~lict~, Ohm res o
a~ va ~i do eve~chin. ~...~. ..... [~' p ue concacc
~:rc~es .e~ poinc you ~o [~'~ _~_.~c~7 ~i~ ~our
b O~c .... ~-- ~ea~c~ pa~
Y ~cc ~a. ~d h~ecLous,
~h us, please contac~ any of the D~s~r~c~ s Fla~d ~g~neer~n~ D~vh~ou'e
~ert the proposed york i . ...~ ........ f r the geosrlphLc area
Atcac euc " JAN 8 1997
12-83-1996
'J · ,J"J 'W1LKISON &
' D~te:
To:
December 3. 1996
Brace Mdqall
8tormwater Mmag,-~ent Department
Kichard H. Mccorm/ck, P.E. ~//
Project Engineer
Ozkes Drsin~tge Ditch
Project Summary end B*ciqlround
At your request, a project summary for the above re~ project is provkEd. ~
Oakcs dra/nag¢ dhch project includes the construction of a S,7~0 fi. long swale to collect
runoff' fi'om the ~artem zrea of C-olden Cra~e N. st~es Un/ts No. 96 and 97, and to convey
th~ ~-unoff'to thc Vmx~rbilt Beach Road ~ It is our ut~ that ttth zrea has
been prone to flood/n~/n r~¢ent years and ~ ay= not m/eq~e dral~e fa~es irt
pla~e. The flooding ptoble~t h~ beta compotmd~l ha ~ yea~ a~ each ~ home
re.long 10~ - 24th Avenues ~ a (lriv,~v~y culveft which ~ a~oped to the ~ I~ccau~
Collier County h~ not ~ the dhch in th~ 30 foot dr~c ~ thc runoff
~ not Bad ~ positive outfalL Stormwuf~r ~eme~ De~'tmc~ Director John ~ot~t,
~sked W'~Ms~n & As~c~tes, Inc., fwd) to ~t~/t a der~n propo~d f~r d~ 8r~gc
finprovements. In Fetmmy I99S, W~. ~ ~~ to' ~ ~urv~ ~xl
en~uecri~ sc~v~.~, lvfr. Boldt provlcled W,~.A with a lXOpo~ed c~o~-~,ec~on of tho
swale eJon~ w~ somc topo~pMc ,~ Joc~Mn ~ wMch h~d alreaSy been
completed ~Iong the cas~rl7 potion of Golden O~te Unk~ No. 9~ and 97. W,~r~
· completed the ~wey ~cl design work under Collier Coum'y's d~c~on in Apr~ of 199&
· The ColIier County Stomwat. er Mamg~ D~ remahe~ proactive h e//nts to
keep the cornnnm~ hfomed of the proposed/mpro~ W~A assured Collier
schedule (letter atuchca*). W,~r.A received two tcl~hone cans Jn mtrl~t of the projcct
and none in opposition. In mtdition, two landowners were allowed time to x'cce~e their
necessary right-of-way pern:~t, ~o ~ COtu:iPy cottld incln(l¢ t)~ culvert con.~l~Lic~Jon in thc
Oaf. s drz~zm~e ~ch project
EXCHANGE AVE., NAPLES, FL 34104 941-643-24~
DAV1D $. WIU(ISOFI, .~.£ JAMES N. WIU~JON, I
Mr. Mct~ll
The dep',.h of the proposed swale w~ vary from zero to two ~ ss it extends south from
22nd Avenue 1¢~ to Vand~blk Beach Road.' A tr~velway ws.4 also included for periodic
~i~t~ ~___~x-ss_ to the ~ No ir~cts to th~ a4jac~ hom~ovazrs or the
wcr~ proposed ~ all work was fo be ~ thc thirty foot e~e~-.~: To
i .r,~acts to tI~ area, all removed trees w~re to ba hauled form si~ or chlpp~d. Thc $ou~h
Florida Water M~em~t District ~icwcd the proposed project, and dctc~.~
an erMronm~,T~,! resource perafit was not rcqulrcd. To minimize en~.,'onmcnial impacts,
iht d~sign plans called for tM initallation of ~t fencing it the ditch ovt~_ hi addilion,
~he co n.-'tm~on area w~l be seeded davy during the grading phase of construction
We hope th/s informa~on will assist you in providing background informagon on the
project to those concer~d. If you have any queslions plcas~ feel free to call us.
EI~'D OF MEMORANDUM
,JAN 2 8 1997
TROPIC. aL 8qVIR C PAGE 01
Gary and Cathy Graves
5630 16th Avenue NW
Naples, Florida 34119
RE:
TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
CO1WSULTANTS
2396 13tk
[c~.~one & Fax (813) 263.0077
December 5, 1996
Preliminary Analysis/Evaluation of habitat alterations, those
now occurring (the drainage easement) and those proposed (ag
lands adjacent to the east, 'DeVosta" proposal) relative to
wildlife usage.
Dear Cathy and Gary,
Per our discussions on the phone, our on site meeting with you November
;)6, 1996 and my review of relevant Tropical Envlronmental Consultants
office file documents please find my environmental evaluation.
i will first address the 30 foot wlde drainage easement (Right-of-way)
recently cleared along your eastern property boundary.
My review of the 1990 Collier County Soil Survey Indicates that hydric
soils are present within a majority of the entire length of the drainage R.
O. W. for at least two miles.
As we discussed in the field this condition in and of itself does not mean
that regulatory agencies would assert wetland jurisdiction. Two other
characteristics must also occur, i. e., Wetland vegetation and sufficient
hydroperiod before the three tests are met.
I would, however, recommend you inquire at the county if a wetland
determination was undertaken and what the agency (South Florida Water
Management District-$FWMD and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-USACOE)
determined.
What Is evident to me was the lack of installatto[
page 1 of 5
JAN ,~ 8 1997
TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
· CONSULTANTS
2396 J,lth Street, North
Naples, Florida 33940
Phone & [:ax (8[3) 263-(X)77
containment fence, along the western edge of the R. O. W. This is required
by the county itself for two reasons: 1) to prevent soil/silt/fines from
entering wetlands and open water'such as canals, 2) to clearly delineate
the limits of clearing and thus protect native vegetation outside of the
county drainage easement from damage Installation of this device is a
standard proceedure and considered a Best Uanagement Practice (BMP's)
for land alterations during construction. Surprised the county does not
follow its own requirements.
Your observations that the Big Cypress Fox squirrel commonly forages and
dwells in your yard and general vicinity was verified as we saw several
behind your residence and up on the roof. Obviously necessary life history
requirements of this species are being provided in Unit 97 and most
shuridly along the entire ag land forested edge.
A detailed survey must be conducted to evaluate where.dening/nesting
sites exist as the Florida Game and Fish Commission legally can only
protect the nest sites. This is required before land alterations can begin.
Of special concern to me was did the county conduct such a survey before
the clearing of the R. O. W, was begun? The stand of melaleUca trees
present behind your office and residence would be prime habitat for
squirrel nests. The Big Cypress Fox squirrel seems to prefer constructing
nests within the dense canopy of melaleuca found within altered wetlands,
Destruction of these without proper review and permitting by the FL. G. &
F C would be a clear violation of Rorlda law. A portion of the cypress,
melaleuc~ and slash pine stand clearly was present within the R, O. W.
along your property.
! would recommend that you confer with county staff to determine if this
survey was conducted and what were the findings.
page 2 of
JAN 2 8 1997
TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
'CONSULTANTS
lS~6 13th Str¢~, Nor~h
N.rl~, Flo~da .t:1940
Phone &. Fax (813)
Edges between differing landscape vegetational feature (ecotones) are
ve~ rich and diverse when considering the variety and numbers of plant
and animal species. This biodiversity is possible because the habitat
provides essential needs of a variety of species such as the Big Cypress
Fox squirrel and the Bob cat. Note, scat was noted within the cleared R. O.
W.
This edge, along the Estates lots from Vanderbilt Road to Immockalee,
also provides a forested corridor which facilitates movement of wildlife
over larger distances.
Some comments relative to the proposed land alterations within the ag
fields adjacent and to the east of you.
My first concern, now that the 30' drainage R. O. W. has been cleared, is
the potential loss of additional forested edge which presently exists on or
along the ag perimeter spoil berm.
Prior to the clearing of the R. O. W. the edge of the farm fields, just at the
perimeter spoil mound, functioned as the ecotonal edge community.
If the ag property also has a 30' drainage easement, one contiguous with
your 30' easement, then it too might be cleared. The entire berm and
associated ag cr~ch would be eliminated and in it place .would be a 60'
drainage easement, completely devoid of mature native trees.
This would further degrade the functional aspects of the occupied range .of
the bob cat and the B. C. fox squirrel as well as other wildlife.
One requirement of larger developments, such as the one being proposed by
Mr. DeVosta, is that a perimeter berm 'be Installed to insure storm water
runoff is held within the development. This new berm would be
constructed interior to the 60' drainage R. O. W. further eliminating
forested corridors for wildlife movement.
page 3 of 5
AG£,i~~,~
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
AGEND .~
TROPICAL ]~N~IRO~M~AL
CONSULTANTS
Naple~, Floti~ 3;1940
Phone & Fax (813) 26~077
County planning staff, as recently as two weeks ago, expressed concern by
the new type of development being designed which offer little native
vegetated buffers but instead consist of a repeating finger lake and fill
complex, one which 'double loads" housing along access roads.
Environmentally, functionally, these designs preserve little to rfo forested
areas especially if slated for already cleared active ag areas such as that
to the east of you.
As you know the county Land Development Code Regulations require
preservation of a percentage of native habitat when present. Development
In previous active ag areas do not have to preserve native habitat if none
existed.
The Collier staff professional planners believe that these types of
development designs could be more environmentally and esthetic, ally
pleasing, if required to recreate masses of native vegetation, such as
adequate and functional perimeter buffers. I concur with that evaluation.
Specific efforts are being proposed through the'South Florida Water
Management District's Environmental Advisory Committee to request tht
the District evaluate the effectiveness of buffer requirements on water
quality and wildlife values. The scientific literature clearly suggests
that buffers of 100+ feet are necessary to preserve wildlife values and
maintian biodiversity.
No one in the field of ecology/wildlife management would disagree that
the fragmentation of the landscape by agricultural practices and urban
development is a threat to wildlife and biodiversity. They also agree that
there are designs which if incorporated into both land uses would enhance
the value to wildlife, especially if the more Intense landscape altering
land use is adjacent to larger intact habitat systems,' L e., rural estates
type rnoSalc where the majority of the native vegetation is retained.
· page 4 of 5
AGENDA.ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
TEOPICAL ENVIRONM~ENTAL
CONSULTANTS
~.39~ l~th St,~¢t. Nord~
Napl~, ~orida
~e & Fax (SD)
There ~re B~t Management Pra~ices (BMP's) which, if applied to
DeVost~ ~nd ~deton L~kes style design ~at, would enhance, augment,
already existing habitat ~n~ions provided ~Iong the estates units-ag
fields inte~ce. ~e creation of a forested burr along the edges,
e~eclally ~en a more intense land ~e Is pro~sed on one
~rm fields multi~miJy units adjacent to the single ~mlly estates
zoning, would a~ist both developments to bridge the ~ns~fion between
them as well ~s provide corridor edge habitat for
In con~uslon your statement that the creation of finger lakes would
involve bl~sting to ~cture the subsu~ce rock and ~llt~te the
excavation proc~s has the pDtentia~ to ~lter ground ~ter hydrol~y and
recharge characteristics, especially in adjacent wetlands due to the
potential of Ka~ conditions in southwest Flofi~. Fm~ures could
near sur~ce mad/clay l~yers ~llowin9 summer rains to more ~uickly
penetrate do~rd reducing the hydropefiod of affected wetlands. This
~nd fo~ation of sink holes were a serous problem when the Lee Coun~
Region~! (now InternatiOnal) airpo~ was constructed.
My repo~ ~ general in co~mge, however ~dditlon~! field, investigation
~nd reMew of county records and pe~it ~pplications would alloW a more
accurate e~uat~on of en~ronment~l issues raised.
Thank you f~ alJowing Tropical EnMr0nment~l Consultan~ to ~sslst your
info~tlon gathering process. If we ~n assist your effo~ ~her
give a call.
Biologist/Consultant
copy: ·Commission Tim Constantine
Collier County E A B
Klm Dryden-F G & F Commission
South Florid~ Water Management District-Fort Myers
The Conservancy of SW Floflda - AG£ND/LIT£~_
JA~ 2 8 ~997
FLORIDA GA.M~ AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION
MORRIS QL~TON t. HEDGEI~-rH. DDS MRS. GF~BERT W. HU.~HItEY THOMAS B. KIBLER JOE BRL.~R
Sa4-asou .Miami Miccomkee Lakeland Desdn
ALLAN L. EGBERT. ~D.. [.__~,¢ ~
VICTOR $. HELLER. ~a~.: F.---~w Ou~o~
Office of Environmental
Services
29200 Tuckers Grade
PunCa Corda, FL 33955
Oecenber ll. 1996
Ms. Cathy Graves
5630 16ch Avenue,
Naples, FL 34119
BiG Cypress Fox Squirrel
Habitat, Oakes Boulevard Area,
Island Walk DRI
Dear Ms. Graves:
This is in response to your letter dated November 26 regarding potential
impacts to the Big Cypress fox squirrel, a state-threatened species, and other
non-listed wildlife, as a result of the development of the referenced Island
Walk Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Your letter indicates that Collier
County also cleared a drainage easement adjacent to your property, possibly in
conjunction w£r_h r. he proposed development. You requested lr~ormatton as to
whether the Gene and Fresh Water Fish Commission (CFC) vas contacted with
regard to the clea~ing on the drainage easement, ~nich apparently was
vegetated wi~h pine, Melaleuca, and brazilian.pepper. You also asked for
information on habitat management practices for fox squirrels.
I can confira that the are· in which you live does have a significant
fox squirrel population. Fox squirrels in Collier County are dependent on
slash pine, bald cypress, cabbage pal~ for forage and nesting (sometimes in
bromeliada on the ~rees). However, Big Cypress £ox squirrels in Southwest
Florida do use exotic vegetation, particularly Melaleuca, £or nesting. This
is not to condone the preservation of Mel·leuca, ~nich has very detrimental
impacts on fox squirrel habitat ·s · whole, but is & s:atenent of fact. We
regularly coordinate with consultants, developers, and Collier Counry staff to
assure ~hat forested areas, including Mel·leuc·-lnv·ded habitats, ere checked
for the presence of active nests prior to cie·ring activities. In this case,
we were hOC contacted regarding the easement habiEa~ cie·ting.
As discussed with you, ye did not review the referenced DRI because of
our .workload and the fact that the site vas primarily · cleared fan field.
There is, of course, · big diffference in wildlife use between even an active
ffa~m field and · d~velopment site. I concur vl~ you ~aC ~e developnen~ oE
the sl~e h~ po~encial to ~ac~ fox squirrel populatio~ and ~a~ better
planning of the site could benefit fox squirrels and other wlldliffe
subdivision. I have the following recommenda'!¢----A~a:'-d i- 9'
1943- 1993 / JAN 2 8 1997
Ms'. Cathy Craves
December ll, 199&
Page 2
fox squirrels and development sites in Southwest Florida:
l) Fox squirrels (bobcats, foxes, etc) ara particularly vulnerable to
roadkill as they spend ~uch of ~heir time on the ground (ve~ different from
gray squirrels). I have retrieved fox squirrel roadkllls from all over
western Collier County. The proposed DRI plan you provided shove Logan
Boulevard extension as being constructed adjacent to your proper~7, ltoving
the roadway further to the east, away from the forested Estates, would reduce
the potential for roadkill. Fox squirrels will cross large open areas in
search of food resources and have large home ranges, so moving ~he road will
not totally elf_~£nate roadkill, especially since this road ~y become a
north/south corridor into Lee County (we have recommended ~he Logan Boulevard
all~ru~ent over ~he S.R. 951 alignment because of l~pacts to regional wildlife
resources). '"
2) Any existing native fox squirrel habitat (forest), particularly
slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, should be preserved. Although we
recommend the re.oval of exotics such as Melaleuca, no removal should occur
before trees are checked (by a qualified biologist) for active fox squirrel
nests. On most development sites, we recommend re-planting areas where
exotics have been removed with native trees.
3) A habf~t buffer to intensive development, along with any reduction
in residential d~nsity that would allow more habitat preservation/restoration,
is beneficial to wildlife, including fox squirrels. Mixed-use development
causes the disturbances to native wildlife, including problems associated with
pets (predation, disturbance), light and noise (deters some habitat use by
some species), nuisance animal co~plaints (animals such ~s bobcats or bats
killed or removed because of real or perceived ~hreat), roadklll ('slow'
speeds rarely eliminate the problem), herbicide/pesticide (lncludinj~osquito
spraying) applic~tion (kills non-target species), and proliferation of 'common
species' such ~s raccoons, pigeons, mockingbirds, and armadillos, rl~at compete
with o~her more habitat sensitive wildlife species. The proliferation of
common or nuisance animals on development sites can affect ~he qu~li~ of
adjacent wildlife communities, including some of the bird species you
mentioned in your letter. The buffer should be as big as possible (usually
economics are ~.be determining factor). The proposed 20oft buffer you
mentioned has very little value.
Please call me at (9~1) 575-5765 if you have any questions.
E~V 1-11-2
cc: Collier Co. Development Services
Sincerely,
Biological Scientist IV
JAN 2 8 1997
BIG CYPILESS FOX SQUIRREL
HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
PELICAN STRAND
Prepared For
Pelican Strand, Ltd.
I0100 Valewood Drive
Naples, FL 33999
Prepared By
ylan
nviro~a~l~~
Consultants)."fie.
Wcttand & P~ldllfe Surve~nmtnml pe.r/nam~.
102.51 Metro Pathway. Suite 202. Foet Myer~ Florida. 33912
~one: (9~I) ~18~671
F~: (9~1) ~I8~672
November 4, 1996
JAN 2 8 1997
e,. c:~T .. . ......
Approximately 12.96 acres of pine flatwoods will be crdated adjacent to the golf course in the northern
of the site. The approximate locations of these areas are shown in the attached preservation plan.
,, construction is completed these areas will be re vegetateci with species native to pine flatwoods.
The tree density will be based on 25 foot centers and the shrub plantings based on 20 foot cente~. The
plantings will be clustered to mimic natural communities. The following is a list of potential species
to be planted:
Trees
Pinus elliottii
Quercus virginiana
Sabal palmetto
Strangler Fig
Pemea spp.
Mid story
Ilex cassine
Ilex glabra
Myrica cerifera
Serenoa repens
Befaria racemosa
Lyonia ferruginea
The specific species planted will depend on the site conditions when the construction is completed and
the market availability, of the various plant material. No exotic palms or trees will be substituted for
native plants. The majority of the tree plantings, approximately 80 percent will consist of slash pine.
Construction Details
nrmediately prior to initiation of construction on any phase of development, the areas will be checked
the presence of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests. If active nests are found, buffers will be
maintained around the nest trees until the nests are deemed inactive. The buffers are anticipated to be
around 100 fee: in width. Any deviations from this dimension will be presented to the FGFWFC for
review and approval, prior to implementation. Before implementation of the restoration work, the
limits of any native vegetation, especially mature slash pine, will be marked in the field and the areas
barricaded to maintain this vegetation intact
Most of the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be placed under a Conservation Easement to Collier
County or the SFWMD. A copy of this plan will be an attachment to the easement. The exceptions to
this are the areas immediately adjacent to the golf course areas. These areas will be within designated
common area and signage will be posted alerting pedestrians of the preservation status of these areas.
All Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be subject to a long term maintenance pwgram.
7
AGEUO& ITEM_
dAN g 8 1997
P~..-~:~-~---
Existing Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nest Adjoining
Drainage Easement Improvements.
AGEN I M -
,.I/~1,I ~, 8 1997
NO.
Big Cypress Fox Squirrels That Currently Exist On My
Adjoining Property.
Improvements
$1'AFF RECOIVlIviENDATiO'NS
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
!~ ~T ASSESSMENT
FOR
ISLANDWALK
05-9596-132
The 705 acre IslandWalk development is located in northwest Collier County (see location map).
The pwperry is bound by the Dove Point Development on the north, largely vacant property on the
east, the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and the Golden Crate Estates area on the south, and the
proposed Logan Boulevard Corridor (in part) and Golden Gate Estates on thc west. The southwesl
coroer of the property adjoins a portion of The Vineyards Of Naples DRI. As proposed, the
IslandWalk Development of Regional Impact will consist of2, 100 residential units (ofvarious types)
located on approximately 363 acres, a "Town Center" area containing minor retail and service
facilities (15 acres), a l?l-acre lake, 103 acres of open space and buffer areas, a 2-acre wetland
conservation area, 33 acres of internal road right-of-ways, and an 18.acre right-of-way for
proposed Logan Boulevard Extension. The project is planned for one, 6-year phase; beginning in
1997 and ending in 2002.
RECOMMENDI~D ACTION:
The staff of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
r~commend Conditiona~ A_L2pmval for the IslandWalk DP, I, to
be further conditioned on a finding of Consistency with the
Local Government Comprehensive Plan by the Collier
County Board of County Commissioners.
NOVEMBER 1996
AGENDA ITEM
JAN g 8 1997
Southwest F. iorida. Regional Planning CoJ~l~j~~
4980 Bayhne Drive, N. Fort Myers, Fiori~
DEV_E..L_O_.p..MENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT ASS~§~'MEhT
FOR
ISLANDWALK
05-9596-132
NOVEMBER 1996
~ AGE IT£ ~
~~,~ I "°'~ i
Southwest F. ior, da. Regional Planning Co.u~_c~~~.~
4980Bayi'neDr've'N'F°rtMyers'Fl°r'~7. ~
SOUTHt~'T FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL MEM'BER$I-rfP
CHAIRMAN .......... Commissioner Eugene Matthews
VICE CHAIRMAN ..........Commissioner Sue Dudley
SECRET~;;' ........ Commi,~mer-M.-Franklyn Jones
TREASURER .......... Commissioner Kenneth 'Butch' Jones
CHARLOTTE COUNTY
Commissioner Sue Dudley
Commissioner Adam Cummings
Mayor Lindsay Harfington
Mr. William K. Russell
(vacancy)
GLADES COUNTY
Commissioner Kenneth S. Jones
Commissioner Robert Giesler
Councilman R. Gerry Harris
Ms. Nancy Shore
Commissioner John Manning
Commissioner John Albion
Councilman Tony Proctor
Councilman Robert B. Davison
Councilman Richard Bashaw
Rev. Israel Su~rez
Mr. Carl B. Snipes
COLLIER COUNTY
Commissioner Timothy J. Constantine
Commissioner John C. Norris
Councilman Fred L. Sullivan
Mr. Richard L. Klm
Mr. Robert L. Duane
HENDRY COUNTY
Commissioner Joseph R. Spratt, Jr.
Commissioner Charles M. Martinez
Commissioner M. Franklyn Jones
Mr. Henry L. Bennett
SARA$OTA COUNTy
Commissioner Eugene Matthews
Commissioner Jack O'Neil
Commissioner Roy E. Hall, Sr.
Mayor Merle L. Graser
Mr. John C. Urban, Jr.
Ms. Ruth Thomas
EX.OFFICIO M1-'MBEI~I
Mr. Chip Merfiam, SI=WMD
Mr. Norm Feder, FDOT
SOUTITWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIl. STAI~
WAYNE E. DALTRY .......... EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DAVID Y. BURR .......... PLANNING DIRECTOR
DAVID E. BRUNER ........ LEGAL COUNSEL
Glen H. Ahlcn
Patti Armbmstcr
Charles Barmby
Bett~ Bm'sick
Rick Carpenter
Dorothy Cook
Julia B. Davis
John L. Gibbons
Susan Gill
Nichole L. Owtnnett
Glenn E. Heath
Deborah A. Holly
Tiffany Lmterman
William McGrath
James E. Newton, Il
Xiaodan *Dawn' Qiu
I-2
Maureen Swenson
Daniel L Trescott
Charles Waddln~on, IH
Timothy Walker
Derek C.S. Wolfe
D. Hunter Wynne
AGENDA ITE~I~..
JAN 2 8 1997
\ AGEND~
PRIMARY STAFF FOR
ISLANDWALK DRI REVIEW
...... .Eoordinator. Gle.nn_ ~.Heath ..
Energy, Stormwater Management, Wastewater ManagemenffWater Supply, Consistency with the
Local Comprehensive Plan, Consistency with the Regional Policy Plan, Consistency with the State
Land Development Plan, Education, Recreation an&Open Space o Glenn E. Heath
Police and Fire Protection, Solid/Hazardous/Medical Waste - .lohn L. Gibbons
Transportation - Maureen E. Swenson
Secretary - Patti L. Armbmster
AGEI~DA ITEM--
JAN 2 8 1997
TABLE OF CONTENT~
Introduction
Applicant Iaformation and Dotclopment Summary ..
on Maps ................................... .. ..................................... iii
Existing Land Use .................................................................. :... iv
Mast~ Development Plan.
R~gional Recommendations
Local Recommendations
Appendices: StaitRcports and Support Data
Appendix I: Regional Issues Analysis
B.
C. Transportation .............................................. I-C-I
D. Wastewater Management/Water Supply ........ ' .....................
E. Consistc'ncy with Local Comprehensive Plan .... i .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' ....................... ~E-I
G. Consistency with the State Land D~v¢lopment Plan ...................................... I-Gq
Apl:~mdix II: Local Issues
A. Education ....................................................
B. Solid/Hazardous/Medical Wast~ ................ ' ............... II-A-!
· C. Recreation And Olx-n Space ....................... II-B-I
D. Police And Fire Prote~on ........................................................ II-C-I
Apl~ndix HI: Draft Dtwelopment Order
Aplgndix IV: Substantial IX~iation Monitoring Form ....................................... 13/-i
Appendix V: South Florida Waia- Managem~nl District Comments V~f~
JAN 1 8 1997
INTRODUCTION
The "IslandWalk" DRI is located in northwestern Collier County, at the extreme north end of the
Golden Gate Estates platted.ar~a...At buildout, the_p, rpp.os.ed deve~Iopment is to consist of 2,100
residential units (of various types) located on approximately 363 acres, a "Town Center" area
containing minor retail and service facilities (I 5 acres), a 171-acre lake, 103 acres of open space and
buffer areas, a 2-acre wetland conservation area, 33 acres of internal road right-of-ways, and an I g-
acre right-of-way for the proposed Logan Boulevard Extension, for a total land area of 705 acres.
The project is planned for one, six-year phase; beginning in 1997 and concluding in 2002.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Thc impact assessment for the "IslandWalk" DRI has been prepared by the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council as required by Chapter 380, .F_I~. The DRI assessment is
largely based on information supplied in the Application for Development Approval (ADA).
Additional information was obtained by consulting official plans, and by reviewing reports related
to specific issues in the impact assessment. The ADA was reviewed by Collier County staffand
their comments were integrated into various elements of the assessment. Water-related elements
were reviewed by the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), and vegetation and wildlife issues were reviewed by the Florida
game and Freshwater Fish Commission and FDEP.
The Council's staff assessment is usually split into regional and local issues. The regional issues are
~hose that have the potential to affect more than one county (or that could affect a regional resource
or facility). Recommendations regarding regional issues are formal conditions to be included by the
local government in any Development Order which has jurisdiction over the DR/in question. In
contrast, local issues are those that affect only the jurisdiction within a particular count),.
.Accordingly, the Council staffs objective, with regard to these issues, is to highlight the crucial local
~ssues and suggest remedial action to be incorporated in the local Development Order, should the
local govemment decide to approve the project. The local government may decide to include these
suggestions as Development Order conditions for approval, or may opt to address the local issues
through other means.
The findings of this evaluation and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's
recommendations are not intended to foreclose or abridge the legal responsibility of local
government to act pursuant to applicable local laws and ordinances. Copies ofany "Development
Order" (an order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an Application for Development
Approval) issued with regard to the proposed development must be transmitted to the S ..~o~|~£~ ·
Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Afl .irs.
JAN g 8 1997
\ AGENDA. ITEM
Project Name
Date on which DRI/ADA was officially accepted
Date on which DP.I/ADA was found ~fficient
County DRI Hearing Date
Date County Notified SWFRPC of Public Hearing
Type of Development
Location of Development
DRI Threshold
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Residential Units
....... Sunco ~uilding Corporation
3600 Vanderbilt Beach
Extension
Naples, FL 33999
(941)594-7400
Fax: (941) 594-7177
May 13, 1996
September 13, 1996
January 14, 1997
October 14, 1996
Residential, with ancillary retail
Collier County
1,000 units
Total Acres
Estimated Average Potable Water Demand/
Wastewater Generation (gallons per day}
Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Project Construction Period
ii
Road
2,100 multi-family and single family
units
705 Acres
577,500 glxl
15,400 Ib~/day
6 years to 2002
AGEMOA,ATEM.
JAil 2 8 1997
AGENDA ITEM. I
LEE COUNTY
CR 858
ISLANDWALK
SR 84
84
ISLANDWALK
GENERAL LOCATION MAP
EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY
JAN 2 8 1997
.I
t
ill
GuLF oF
MEXICO
1991
1997
,1
! I
STAFF RECOM iENDATiON$
SOUTHWEST I~I~ORIDA REGIONAl, PLANNING COUNCIL'S
STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL
PLANNING COUNCIL THAT THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL,
AS AM:ENDED BY.TIlE SIJFFICIENCY REPORT DATED AUGUST 1S, 199~;, BE
APPROVED SUB,IEC~ TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. ~ (Refer to Appendix I, Section A)
The proposed project w~l be ekcuica~y powered s.,xt w~ hcrcase the energy demands ofthe
region. The applicant has committed, in the Application for Development Approval (ADA),
to help reduce the energy impact of the project, through compliance with applicable standard
regional energy conservation measures.
Any DRI Development Order is,vaed by Collier County shall contain a provision that the
appticant's commitments for energy conservation are adopted az conditions for approval of
this project.
(Refer to Appendix I, Section B)
The proposed Master Surface Water Management System for IslandWalk will utilize the
project's proposed lake system, as well az a preserved/enhanced wetland area, to provide
quality and quantity storage volumes. Runoff'will be conveyed to the lake system through
sheetflow, storm sewers ~nd swales. The Lol?,an Boulevard' Extension was assumed to
provide for its own treatment requirements, independent of' the Master System for the
development. Ofl~e nmoff'fi'om the north will be routed through and around the system to
the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Logan Boulevard Canals. The entire Master Stormwater
Management System for IslandWalk is designed based upon the 25 yearfJ day storm event.
South Florida Water Management District staffhas identitled some minor concerns which will
need to be addressed at the time ofDistrict permimn' g. These concerns, az well as standard
Regional staffrecommendations, are addressed belowin the recommended development order
conditions. If these conditions are included in the Collier County Development Order for the
IslandWalk DP, I, no adverse regional water quality or quantity impacts should result from
construction of the development.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Any DR/I:~,~Ol:n~nt Order i,~_~ed by Collier Oamty ~ contain th~ following
1997
a. The IslandWalk DRI shall require an Environmental Resource
bo
Co
do
conceptual approval and for consm~on and operation oftbe proposed surface water
management system and for the proposed wetland enhancement and dredge and fill
activities - fi.om the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), prior to
' commencement ~-con.muctlon ...........
A determination shall be made, by SFWMD and the applicant, prior io the
conunencement ofconstm~on, as to whether a District Waler Us~ Permit, or Permit
Modification, will be required for ct. hain dewatering activities proposed for the
construction of project lakes and/or road or building foundations.
At the time of permit application, the applicant shall provide vegflcation that the
proposed system d~gns-will meet District criteria in effect at that time.
Best management practices shall be included on construction plans for development
and should be submitted to the Collier County Water Management Division for
review and approval.
The South Florida Water Management District Staff Impact Assessment Report
(contained in Appetx~ V ofthe Regional Assessment Report) contains five ($) items
of concern to SFWMD staff regarding the proposed surface water management
system. These items ere detailed on page 7, "Surface Water Management Footnotes",
of the District staff report. These items of concern shall be addressed by the
applicant, to the satisfaction of District staff, prior to the commencement of
construction of the project.
All internal stomrwater management lakes and ditches, and the preserved wetland
area, shall be set aside as private drainage and/or conservation easements on the
recorded final plat. Stormw ter lakes shall includea where practical, adequate
nmntenance easements around the lakes, with access to a paved roadway.
During construction activities, the applicant shall employ best management practices
for erosion and sedimentation control. These practices shall be included with, or
presented on, ail construction plans, and shall be subject to approval by the
appropriate agencies prior to their implementation.
Any construction sat baniers or hay bales, and any art. tot soil, as well as accumulated
silt, shall be removed upon completion ofconstructlon. Either the applicant or the
entities respongble for the specific construction activities requiring these measurc~
The final storrrrwater management plan shall consider, as applicabh ~ntro~
, m 1997
reduce runoff' rates and volumes, including but not limited to, fix
structures, perforated pipes, and grass swale conveyances.
when.ever pom'ble, rather than closed systems.
2
jo
mo
Any shoreline banks created gong the onsite stormwsler marutgement system shall
include littoral zones constructed on slopes consistent with District and Collier
County requirements and ~ be pla;ted in native emergent or submergent aquatic
vegetation. Thezppttcant ~ enmre;~ ~upplemental replanting if necessary, that
at least 8CP/~ covet by native squa~c vegetation is established within the littoraJ zone
t'0r the duration ofthe project.
MTI~e applicant _s~ conduct annt~ ~on$ of the l$1andWalk Master Stormwater
znagement ~ystem and the preserved wetland e'ea on the project site so as to
ensure that these areas are ~ in keeping with the ~ approved designs, and
that the water management system is capable ofaccomp~ the level of stormwater
storage and treatment for which it was intended.
The applicant ~ confirm, to the satLC:action ofall applicable federal, state, and local
review agendes, and the South Florida Water Mmagemem District, that the proposed
stormwater n~ement system ~ not impact habitats of'any state or federally listed
plant and/or animal species potentially occurring onsite, or that such impacts shall be
mitigated to the benefit ofonsite populations of those species.
The applicant, his successors or as~gns, shall undenalce a regularly scheduled vacuum
sweeping of ail common streets and parking areas within the development. The
applicant shall encourage any private parcel owners within the development to
institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of' their respective streets and/or
parking areas.
In areas adjacent to retail uses, the applicant, or the individual site developers, shall
provide at least one inch of dry pre-treatment (retention or detention); or an
equivalent alternative, as determined by the appropriate regulatory agencies; in order
to provide reasonable assurance that hazardous materials will not enter Se
stormwater management system.
The applicant shall participate in any ongoing or fi:ture efforts by Collier County to
establish a county-wide st0rmwater management system.
Ditch and swale dopes ~ be designed to minimize discharges so that these facilities
may provide some additional water quality treatment prior to discharge. Treatment
swales shall be planted with grass.
The grassed stormwmer treatment areas shah be mowed on a ~.~,,,lar besL ...~,0A, F~_~ x
· e no~ la~ ~nt~ of~e d~opm~t, d~ ~
i ' ' ~ ~t my ~ate
n proj~ 1~ ~tch~ or ~ or wMch ~y ~t~e ~ ~e no~ ~ 8 lg~7
~~y.~non ~ on a re~ b~s. ~ ~o~on to b~ ~ ~ ~
3
Underdrain systems and grease babies, ifutiliZed within the lslandWalk DRI, shall
be inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a regular basis. In no instance shall the
period between such inspections exceed eighteen months.
Stormwater management system maintenance requirements shall include removal of
any mosquito-productive nuisance plant species (e.g., water lettuce, water hyacinth,
catta~ and ~rimmse willows) from ail system nodes, reaches, and percolation basins,
as well as fi.om the lake littorai zonec-employed in the system.
To the extent consistent with ~tpplicable stormwater management 'system and
environmental regulations, any isolated wading bird 'pools" constructed in lake
littoral zones sha~ be excavated to a depth which provides ~ttati¢ habitat for
mosquito larvae predators, such as ~
All commimm~ made by the applicant within the ADA, and subsequent sufficiency
round information, rehted to Question 10 (General Project Description), Question 14
(Water), Question 15 (Soils), and Question 19 (Storrmvater Management), and not
in conflict with the above recommendations, shall be incorporated in the Collier
County Development Order as conditions for approval.
3. .~ (Refer to Appendix I, Section C)
Trn~c generated by the IslandWalk DE1, when combined with other l~owth in the area, is anticipated
to necessitate c~rently uncommitted improvements to portions ofVanderbllt Besch Road if adopted
level ofservice standards are to be achieved and maintained through buildout in 2002. The buildout
ofall area development as proposed over the life ofthe project is expected to overload the currently
committed area roadway network, and improvements will need to be developed to ensure that the
entire roadway network w/Il operate satisfactorily.
Bas~ on the needs outlined in this document, any DRI Development Order isst~ed by Collier County
shall contain the following provisions: '
bo
'The applicant or his successor or assigns shall be fully respons~le for site-related
roadway and intersection improvements required within the IslandWalk DRI. The
applicant shall be required to pay the full cost for any sitz-rehted intersection
(including but not limited to signalization, turn lanes and additional through lanes)
found to be necessary by Collier County for the proj
Vanderbilt Beach Road and Lo~.n Boulevard. The site access
and developed consistent with Collier County's ~ management
rnit re i .-ments.
Adequate commitments to provide the ner.,essary transportation
including design and engineering
4
points ~.
utility, relocation, r/ght-of-way ~.,qm
construction, construction contract administration, and construction inspection
necessary to maintain the adopted level of service for the following significantly
impacted regional roadway through project bulldout in 2002:
Vanderbilt Beach Road
- Airport-Pulling Road to Oaks Boulevard.
Adequate commitments to provide tr~e necessary improvements, including but not
limited to, right-of-way, cost of signalization, turn lanes, and other improvements '
deemed necessary by Collier County to maintain the adopted level ofservice of the
following significantly impacted intersections through project buildout:
Vand~bilt Beach Road/Airpon-Pulling Road
Vanderbilt Beach Road/Oaks Boulevard
Vanderbilt Beach Road/Logan Boulevard
Vanderbilt Beach Road/CR 951.
Improvements to the facilities outlined in recommendatiom "b" and "c" above shall
be made at the time that a road segment or intersecIion is expected to exceed the level
of' service standard adopted in the local comprehensive plan. Service level
determination shall be made by Collier County. To determine the existing levels of'
service on regional facilities and the need for improvements in a timely manner, the
applicant shall submit an annual monitoring report to Collier County, Florida
Department of Transportation, Florida Department of' Community Affairs and the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council for review and approval. The first
monitoring report shall be submitted one year after the approval of the development
order for the IslandWalk DRI. Repons shall be submitted annually thereafter until
aler buiidout of.the project.
At a minimum, the report shall contain p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates and
turning movements at each of the access intersections and the off-site intersections
listed above in recommendation "c", and a calculation ofthe existing level of'service
at these intersections and on the road segments indicated above in recommendation
"b". The levels of service shall be calculated according to current prof~onal
standards. The report shall also provide a calculation ofthe existing level of service
on the facilities and the estimated levels of service and project impact for the her
year. The annual monitoring report shall also identify the status of the road
improvements assumed to be committed in the ADA, and any deviations from the
schedule identified in the ADA shall be addressed in the Notice of
process per Chapter 380.06(19), l~ittta,q, laltg~. ~~?
Based on th~ transportation assessment of.significant project imp
of the following transportation improvements shall be needed prior to,
with, development of.the IslandWalk DR/, if.adopted level of'service ~"
to be' maintained through bulldout (2002) on regional roadwsy
$
o
Vandcrbik Beach Road
- Airpon-Pt~Sttoad~o Oaks Boulevard- -
Vanderbilt Beach Road/Airport.l~dl!,~g Road
-Signal Retiming
Vanderbilt Beach Road/Oaks Boulevird
-Sisnallmion, if'warranted
Vanderbflt Beach Road/logan Boulevard
-Sisralimlon, irwdrranted
Vanderbilt Beach Road/CR 951
-Sisnalimion, it warranted
Development Order options may be considered by Collier County and the applicant
to the extent that the options provide adequate commitments for improvements
indicated above to significaatly impacted regional roadways and intersections.
Whatever options sr~ exercised, however, should be done with the understanding that
the following conditions shall be met:
If'annual monitoring reports confrm that peak season, peak hour directional
traffic on the regional road segments and imersections above exceed the level
of service standards adopted by the County and the project is ut,'l;~ng more
than $% of the adopted level of service capacity (significant impact), then
~unher building permits and certificates of occupancy shall not be granted
until the standards of the County's concurrency management system have
been met. The development order shall identi~ how the DRI wrll be treated
in relation to the concurrency management system.
The transportation impact 'to the roads and ~ersecIions above shall be
appmpriatdy sddres,~d consistent with Southwest Florlda Regional Planning
Cotmcll polldes, a~d the detmrlnagon ofproporg~ shar~ and/or plpelining
of the regional road improvements shall b~ in scamiaac~ with S¢~'tion
163.3220, F.S. which ~ a Local Oov~raent IX'~opn~nt igr~ment
and a commltm~tt by the applicant sad/or the local govcrament to ~
concurrency on all significan~ impacted regional maLt
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT/WATER Sm'Pt.y (Refer to Appendix L Section D)
wTh~o ~.alk Dm will be provided with potable walet service by.th~ Comer Co~lnty ..p~I. RII>R,,p'.,E~
rks Division. The County has indicated that adequate capacity for the dev~o~'~//
currently available through, water main and fire hydrant lead which eve~op~~
rrm along 8 1997
Beach Road. The proj~."ted potable waler demand, at buildout, for the d
577,500 ga/Ions per day, or 0.58 MGD. ~. I'~. ~
The project's'non-potable water 'demand will inig'"'"'"'"'"~y be met through use
6
from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer. This water may be stored in on.site holding ponds for
irrigation use. Irrigation is the only antlclpsied non-potable use. Eventually, the applicant
plans to utilize recycled effluent, from the Collier County Public Works Division, for non-
potable purposes. The C.b,,-i~ris currently constructing a disirl'bu~on line along Vandetbilt
Beach Road. The line may be available for the project to tap into by the time development
commences in 1997. The South Florida Wsiet Management District has indicated that the
project's groundwater usage may be restricted, si some future date, due to the potential for
saltwater intmslon in the project area. District¥,~ffis also recommending that the project be
required to pursue other sources ofinigagon water (rather than groundwater), including the
proposed recycled effluent sotar~. The project's final non-potable water demand is expected
to be approximately 1,600,000 gallons per day, or 1.6 MGD.
WastewaIer treaiment for the project is also expeaed to be supplied by Collier County Public
Works Division. County Public Works has indicated that it currently has adequate capacity
to service the DILl, should no other demands cause the wastewsier plant serving the site to
exceed ks design capacity. At buildout, the projected wastewater generation for lslandWalk
will reach 577,500 gallons per day, or 0.$8 MGD. If the following recommendations are
incorporated in development water conditions for the IslandWalk DRI, no adverse impacts
to Water Supply or Wastewater Management should occur.
RECOMMENDATION8
Any DRI Development Order [~_~_~ed by Coiner County shall contain the following provisions:
This project shall require a modification to District Permit #11-00164-W, for the
proposed groundwater withdrawals for landscape irrigation, to be approved prior to
the commencement of project construction.
Prior to commencement of construction, the spplica~ and South Florida Water
Managem~ District shall determine whether the proposed construction activities will
require a water use permit for certain dewatering activities proposed for the
construction ofonsite lakes, and/or road or building foundations.
Co
At the time of application for the District Permit Modification, the applicant shall
provide verification that the proposed plumbing and irrigation system designs meet
District criteria in effect at that time.
The project shall utilize ultra-low volume water use plumbing fixtures, self-closinl~
and/or metered water faucets, .an.d other water conserving devices andi
consistent with the criteria outlined m the water ~on plan of the pul~li¢ Sul~l~iL'~
permit issued to Collier County Public Works Divis~on, or the appropl~telapprf~l~tt g 8 1997
utility provider, by the South Florida Water Management District. /
The proposed irrigation withdrawals will result in an increase in use
from the Lower Tamismi Aquifer beyond currently approved
7
proposed incresse ia ~,~ may increase the potential for saline intrusion end adverse
impacu to cxL~tiag legal users in thc erca. Consequently, an impact enalysis shall be
required for the I~landWelk Development ~t the time of permit modification
application. 'Th~impe~-a~alysi~ shall~dude~an evaluation of the use of alternative
sources, such es recle~ned water, ~rf'a~e water, or the water table aquifer.
The project shall obtain potable v~ter, wastewater treatment ~cl, eventually non°
potable water, fi.om the Collier County Public Wodc~ Oivision, if' Collier County
Public Works determines that it hu su~cient capacity to serve the project. Should
Collier County Public Works Division determine that it does not have sufficient
capacity to serve the project, the applicant shall either construct interim potable water,
westewater treatment and/or non-potable water facili~ or shall postpone
development until such time es Collier County Public Works' service capacity is
available to the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the applicant shall be
constructed to Collier County Public Works Division Standards, and shall be
dismamled, at the applicant's expertse, upon connection to the County facilities.
Whether potable water, wastcvater tresm~ent and/or non-potable water facilities ere
provided onsite or offsite' the applicant shall demonstrate to Coliier County that
adequate capacity is available at the time of final plan submittal.
As the IslandWalk DRI intends to utilize treated effluent for irrigation, the applicant
shall ensure that on.site lakes, the preserved wetland, and the stormwater management
system arc adequately buffered fi.om possa'blc cffiuent contamination.
Tempomy septic systems may be ut' ;dized ia conjunction with construction and sales
offices and model homes. Septic systems shall not be allowed onsite' other than for
construction and sales offices and model homes. All temporary septic systems shall
be properly abandoned and/or removed by a licensed septic system finn at the time
when permanent or interim westewater treatment facilities come online.
Ail construction plans, technical ~ifie~ons, and proposed plats, es applicable, for
the proposed water dism'butiOn and wastewater collection systems, and any possible
onsite treatment facilities, shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County
Public Works Division prior to commencement of construction.
All potable water facilities, including any pom'ble onsite potable water treatment
plant, shall be properly sized to supply average and peak day domestic demand, in
addition to fire flow demand, at · rate approved by the Golden Crate lru'e C'e~-~! ~':~_ _£..
The lowest qua~z of water ·ratable and ac, oept~ble ~ be ~'~-d ~'or ~i~ 8 lC3~?
potable water uses. :Potable water sha~ not be utilized for aon-potable ~
Ail co~ made by the applicant, within the ADA and sub ...... ~.
(Water Supply), Question 17 (Water Supply), ~nd Question 18 (Wastewater
Management), and not in conflict with the above recommendations shall be
incorporated az conditions ofapprovai within the Collier County Development Order
for IslandWalk. ................
CONSISTENCY WITH THE. LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Refer to Appendix
I, Section E)
According to the applicant, development of the IslandWalk DRI will not require a local
compr~ plan amexirn~. Collier County's adopted Future land Use Map designates
the project areas as"Urban ~r:xed Use Resin. This land use category tllows residential
developmem with a base density oft'our (4) units per acre, gong with ancillary development.
Density increases and decreases may be glowed, based on a rating system contained in the
Future Land Use Elemem. IslandWalk is proposed with a density ofthree (3) units per acre,
which is within the limits set by the land use category. Thus the project appears to be
consistent with the Collier County Growth Management (Comprehensive) Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Any DRI Development Order issued by Collier County shall contain the following provision:
ao
Prior to any development order being ismed, Collier County shall determine if the
proposed IslandWalk DRI is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, and
whether the project's phasing and development schedule is consistent with the
County's Concurrency Management Plan.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
In the "IslandWalk" ADA, numerous commitments were made by the applicant to mitigate
project impacts. Many, but not all ofthese commitments are listed in this staff assessment.
Additionally, the ADA provided a phasing schedule that provided the timing basis for this
review. If this phasing schedule is significantly altered by the applicant, then many ofthe
basic assumptions of this approval could be substantially changed, potentially raising
additional regional issues and/or impacts.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Ail commitments and impact mitigating Letions provided by the applic~
Application for Development Approval (and supplementary documents',
in conflict with specific conditions for project approval
adopted as conditions for approval.
9
eo
Tha q~pllca~ shall sub~ an sra~ report on the development ofresional impact to
Collier C_xx~, tie Somhw~ l:lorida Resio~ PlannlnS Council, the Department of
Community Atrairs and gl tffected permit agencies ss required in Subsection
· ...........
The d~..lopment phas~ schedule presented within the ADA and as adjusted to date
of development order approval shall be incorporated its ~. condition of approval. Ii'
development order conditions sad s~oplicant commitmenis incorporated within the
development order, ADA or sufficiet~ round responses to mltigate regional impacts
are not carried out ~ indicaIed to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules
specitled within the development order and this phasing schedule, then figs shall be
presumed to be a substantig dei~ion for the atTected regional issue.
If the local government, durin8 the course of monltorln& the development, can
demonstrate ~ substangg changes in the conditions undedyin8 the approval of the
development order has occurred or that the development order was based on
substar~,ny inaccuraIe ird'onnalon provided by the developer, resulting in additional
substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have
ocoirred. 'I~ monitoring checilis~ contained in Appendix IV shall be used as a guide
by the local government in dctcrm]ning addition substantial regional impacts.
Pursuant to Chapter 350.06(16), the applicant may be subject to credit for
contributions, construction, expansion, ot acquisition of public facilities, ii' the
developer is also subject by local ordinances to impact fees ot exactions to meet the
same needs. The local government and the developer may enter into a capital
contribution front-ending agreement to reimburse the developer for voluntary
contributions in excess of the fair share.
The local development order shall state the land uses s~roved in gross square feet,
acreages and parking ('d' applicable) consistent with the statewlde guidelines and
standards in Chapter 380.0651 Florida Statutes.
10
AG£1~ O~ ~I'~£1~.
JAN 2 8 1997
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL'S
STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMM}~NDATIONS
IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOUTItWF.,ST FLORIDA REGIONAL
PLANNING COUNCIL THAT THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL,
AS AMENDED BY THE SUFFICIENCY REPORT DATED AUGUST 15, 1996, BE
APPROVED SUBIE~ TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. ]~.!.~,~i_O_~ (Refer to Appendix 1~ Section A)
The IslandWalk DRI could genera~ a total ofT0 elementary, middle school, high school md
college students, by its projected completion in the year 2002. The spplicant has not
proposed school site or facilities donation to tho School Board. Additionally, the County
school system has not yet estimated the potential impact of'the project on its classrooms and
facilities. However, the IdandWalk Development will be subject to school impact fees. The
money generated from such foes could be utilized by Collier County Public Schools to offset
any impacu ot'fl~e devdoprne~. Ifrevenuo ~ occur, duo to tho project's impacts, the
applicant and Collier County Public Schools could negotiate to determino tho manner in which
such shortfalls should be addressed.
Any DRI Development Order issued by Collier County should include the following
provision:
Any financial impacts beyond normal school impact fees, which are generated by the
IslandWalk Development, should be negotiated between the applicant and Collier
County Public Schools, so as to offset any anticipated shortfalls.
e
SOLID/~RDOUS/I~DICAL WAST{~ (Refer to Appendix H, Seaion B)
The applicant has indicated that waste materials generated by the proposed uses for the
development does not meet the definitions of industrial, hazardo~ or special wastes.
Moreover, tho applicant has included retail, services, md community activity wlid waste
under the Domestic Solid Waste category. Further, the project is not expected to contain
laboratories, storage rarities, or warehouse space where hazardous ~
generated or utilized other than those normally associated with medical offic
use in the office district.
11
JAN 2 8 1997
RECOMMENDATIONS
Any DRI Development Orck'rissued~ Collier Coun~ r~uld contain the following pmvlsions:
ao
Any business located within the IslandWalk Development, which generates
hazardous waste, shall be responsible for the temporary storage, siting and
proper disposal of the hazai'dous waste generated by such businesses.
However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste storage facilities
contrary to Collier County Zoning Regulations.
Buildings where hazardous materials or wastes are to be used, displayed,
handled, genemed or stored shall be consiructed with impervious floors, with
adequate floor drains leading to sepa~tte impervious holding facilities which
are adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanup ofany spill, leakage, or
contaminated water.
c. There sl~ll be no outside storage ofbio ]~Tardous or medical waste.
do
The applicant shall ensure that a contractor is available to provide
maintenance of grease trap systems associated with restaurants and food
establishments.
eo
Facilities qualifying under the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act
(SARA) Title ITl of 1986, and the :Florida ~:~rdous Mater;als Emergency
Response and Community Ri~t to Y,.now Act of 1988, shah 5Ie hazardous
materials reporting applications in accordance with Sections 302, 303, 304,
311,312, or 313. Applications sh~l be updated annually by ench reporting
facility. .
The IslandWalk Community is not expected to have any uses which would
generate hazardous waste and thus, no measures need to be taken to separate
l~,~rdous waste from solid waste, no plan/fac~TMes are needed for handling,
generation ~d/or emergencies other than those normally associated with the
permitted uses in the Town Center district. Ifany such use does exist, it will
abide by all applicable federal, state and local requirements.
ho
In the event that used motor oil is generated, it will be stored in federally
approved containers, picked up, transported, and disposed ot
hauling and disposal agents in agcordance with local, state,
regulations requirements.
Should I~?,,rdous waste or waste by-products be generated,
tempontrily stored, l~ndled, transported, and disposed by licem
accordance with local, state, and federal regulations.
12
and l~e~~./
dAN 2 8 1997
hcy win be
AGEND&
~ (]~'fer to App~dix ]I, Sactlon C)
The LslandWalk DM will be comprised ora residential communky constructed around a 171-
acre hke system. Tbe c~ntrs~-~lan~ within ~lopment~will consist of~t Town Center,
which will contain both recreational/open space amenities and minor ret~l development.
These facilities will be solely for the enjoyment of residents and guests and will not be open
to the general public. Each development area within the DE1 will be connected to the Town
Center by · series ofbridges and walkway~ic~cle paths. These facilities appear to meet the
local recreational needs for the project, tn addition, the community park and regional park
impact fees estimated to be gener,_t_~ by the development appear to be in excess of those
normally requb'ed by the County. Sta~recommends that the applicant's commkments, as
stated in the Application for Development Approval, be included as conditions for approval
within the Coiner County Development Order.
RECOM'M'EN'DATION
Any DEl Development Order issued by Collier County shall contain a provision that the
applicant's commitments for Recreation and Open Space are adopted as conditions for
approval ofthis project.
J
POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION (Refer to Appendix I~ Section 4)
Collier County Sher~s Department will provide law enforcement to the project with a
response time between seven and eight minmes. Fire of Hcials have estimated a response time
of five minutes to the project. Collier County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) will
provide fu'st response medical assistance to the project. EMS response time is estimated as
six minutes.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Any DEl Development Order issued by Collier County should contain the following provisions:
a.
b
To assure the project does not dilute the delivery of service fi.om a~acent
County substations, the applicant should continue to meet with the sheriff's
Depamnem to establ~ progranu and bx:oqx~e crime prevention measures
during each phase ofthe site development process.
protection dxxtkl be provided accord to existing standar
The development oflshndWalk w~l imposed~
inclucling those for fire protection and energency medical se~~
upon current impact f__,e-_, sM appmximaI~ S~,000 w~l be collected in f~re
protection impact fees; and spproximaIely $31,f00 will be collected in
emergency medical service impsct fees.
GENERAL CONSWERATIQNS
Some of' the local issues discussed in the preceding sections are related to the time and
funding of' facilities needed for the Isl~ndWalk DR/. There are three general
recommendations that are applicable.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Any DR/ Development Order issued by Collier County should contsin the following
provisions:
The development should satisfy the requirements of any ordinance, which also
required other developments not subject to Chapter 3g0.06, ~ procedures to
pmic~te in ~ its proportions~ share nea~ to accomnm~e the impacts
ofthe development; or
Pursuant to ~ 380.06(163, the applicant may be subject to credit for
contn'butions, construction, expansion or acquisition of public facilities, if the
developer is also subject by local ordinances to impact fees or exactions to meet the
same needs. The local government and the developer may enter into · capital
contn'btrtion f'ont-ending a~reement to reimburse the developer for vohmtary
contn'bufions in excess of his fair share.
Co
Ii'the applicant or Collier County has not or can not make adequate commltmenIs to
provide the needed pub~ fadlifies to accon'anod~te the proposed development, then
the project should be denied.
14
JAN 8 1997
DEVEI.,OP~I' ORD£R O~ ~E gO~ OF
CO~ZSSZO~RS OF COOLER CO~, ~RZD~ FOR
IS~K ~D IN S~ZO~S 33 ~ 34,
TO. SHIP 48 $0~, ~GE 26 ~T, COLLIER
~,
~, Sunco Building Co.ora=ion, a Florida co~ora=ion,
(herein 'S~CO') filed on Ap=il 1~, 199&, wi~h Collie= C~n~y an
Applica=ion fo= Developmen= Approval (~A) of a ~vel~en= of
Regional lmpac= (DRI) kno~ as Xslandwalk in accordance
Subsection 380.0~(6), Florida Statutes; and
~, S~CO hal ob=aimed all necessa~ approvals
Collier Coun=y agencies, depar~men=l, a~d ~ardl =e~i=ed
condi=ion =o Pla~ed Uni= Deve!opmen= (P~) zoning and DRI
approval; and
~RE~, ~he Board of Coun=y Co~issioners as =he gove~ing
body of =he uninco~ora=ed area of Collier Coun=y having
Jurisdic=ion pursuan= =o Sec=ion ~80.06, Florida S~a~u=es,
au=horized and empowered =o consider Applica=ionl for
Approval for Developmen=s of Regional l~ac=;
~KERE~, =he public noxice re~=ire~en=s of Chapter
Florida S=a=u=es, amd =he Co~!ier Coup=7 Lam~ Developmen: Code
(LDO) have been saxisfied; and
~E~, =he Collie= Cou~=y Planning Commission has reviewed
and considered =he repot= and recommenda=ions of =he Sou=hwes=
Florida Regional Pla~ing Council (~PC) and held a public
e
hearing on =he ~A on Dece~er 19, 1996; and
~6E~, =he Board of Coun=y Cc~issloners has passed
Ordinance 96- on Janua~ 14, 1997, which rezoned =he
proper=y =o P~; and
~, ~he issuance o~ a Develcpmen~ O~der pursuan~
Chap~e~ 380.06, Florida S~a~u~es, does no~ constitute a ~aiver
any powers or rights regarding ~he issuance of o~he~ develcpmen~
pe~i~s no~ consis~en~ herewith by ~he County or S~a~e; and
~ER~, on Janua~ 14, 19~7, the Board of County
Commissioners, a= an open public hea=ing in accordance wi~h Sec=ion
JAN 2,81997 il 'J A1997
380.06,~, havin9 considered the application £or
submitted by SUNCO; the report and reco~mendatione of the SWFRPC:
the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the
Collier County Planning Commissicn; the repot: and reco~endations
of the Collier Codn=y Planning Co~ission~ the reco~endatfons of
Collier County Staff and Advi~o~f Boards~ and =he record made
said hearing, ~he Board of Co~ty Co~issioners o~ Collier County
makes ~he following F~ndings of Fac= and Conclusions of Law:
FI~INGS OF
legally described as me= forth ~fl E~lbit "A".
sufficiency response, hereby referred co as co~osi=e Exhibit
which by reference =hereto is nade a par= hereof ~0 =he ex=eh=
i= ~s no= inconsistent with =he =e~s and conditions of ~his Order.
4. The applicant propcs~s =he development of IslandWalk, a
DRI cons!sting of approximately ~0~ ac~es, which includes: a To~
Center area containing re=ail and se~ce facilities of 10,000
s~are fee=, alcng with recr~=Iczal facilities on 15 acres; ~,100
residential dwelling units; a ~ a=re we=land conse~a=ion area; and
274 acres of open space and lakes; all of which are reflected on
=he i11us:ra=ive Master Plan a:cached as Exhibit
5. The development is consis:en= with =he report and
recommendations of the SWFR~C submi:=ed pursuant to Subsection
380.06{12}, Florida Statutes.
6. The development will no= interfere wi~h :he achievemen:
of =he obJ~c=ives of the adopted S:a=e ~nd Development Plan
applicable to =he area.
7. A co~prehensive review Of ~he impac: generated
developmen: has been ccnducted by :he a~propriate
depar:ments and agenclee and ~y the SWFR~C.
8. The developmen: is no: in an area desi~:ed ~ea
380.0S, ~1_~1.~, as amended.
9. The development Ls consistent with the current land
development reTJletione and the Collier County Growth ~anagement
Plan, as amended.
10. The development is consistent with the State
Comprehensive Pl&n.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NOW, THER£FOR£, BE IT P~SOhVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in public meeting, duly
constituted and assembled on this, the 14th day of Janus,7, 1997,
that the ZslandW&lk ADA lubmitted b~ SUNCO is hereby ordered
approved, aubJec: to the following conditions:
1.
The IalandWalk DRI will incorpore:e the following energ~
conser~ation features:
A. Provision of a bicycle/pedestrian system
all land uses consistent with Collier County
reTuirements.
B. Provision of ~icycle racks or storage fa=ill:ica in
re:rea:ions1, co~mercial, and ~ulti-family
residem=ial areas.
C. C:cpera:ion with the County in the locating of bus
a:ope, shelters, and other passenger and system
accommodations if and when a transit aye:em ia
available to serve the project area.
D. Use of energ~-efficien= fee:urea in window design.
£. Use of operable windows and ceiling fans.
F. Installs:ion cf energy-efficien= fee:utes in window
design.
G. Prohibition of deed restrictions or covenants
wo. uld preven: or urmecessarily hamper
conser~,&:Ion efforts.
Reduced ccvera;e by as;halt, ccncre=e, rock, and
sim£1ar s~,s:a~ces in streets, parking 1ocs, and
o:her areas to red=ce local air temperatures and
JAN 2 5 1997
reflected light and heat.
~ns:a~a~ion o~ energy-e~¢ien~ ~ighting
s~reeca, par~i~g areas, recreation areas, a~
inferior and exterior public areas.
Use o~ wa:er clcse~s with a maximum flush o!
gallons and s~ower heads and ~aucets wi~h a
f~ow rate o~ 3.0 gallons per minute (a~ 60 ~cunds
o~ pressure ~er s~uare inch).
Se~ecticn of native p~anta, ~reee, and o~her
vegeca~ion a~d landscape design features
reduce re~irements for water, fer~ilize~,
mai~te~ance, L~d other needs.
~anting c~ ns:lye shade trees to ~rovide
reasonable s~ade for al~ recrea:ion areas, s:reets,
and par~ing ar~as.
P~s=e~e=~ ~ :=ees to provide needed shade
wa:~er ~o~:hs while not overly reduci=~ ~he
benefits of s-~nl£gh= in the cooler months.
N. Planting of n&:ive shade trees for each res!~en=ial
unit.
O. Or~en=atlc~ ~ s~ructures, as possible, ~c reduce
solar hear g~£z bY walls and =c utilize the ~a=ural
cooling effe::s of the wind.
P. Provision lc= s:ruc=ural shading wherever pr&c=lcal
when natural shading cannot be used effectively.
Inclus£cn cf porch/pa=lo areas in residential
units.
R. Considera=ic~ by the project architectural review
cocci=tee(s) of energ~ conservation measures (both
=hose noted he=e and others) to assist bu£1ders and
residents in their efforts to achieve greater
energy efficiency in the development.
A. The IslandWa!k DRI shall re,ire an Environmental
Resource Pe~!t (£R?) - for ccnceptt
-4- AGE~IOA. ITEM
NO, ~
dA/ ,?, $1997
al approval and
Do
Fo
for construction and opera=ica of =he proposed
surface water ~anagemenC system and for =he
proposed wetland e~hancemenc and dredge and
ac=ivities - from =he Sou=h Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD), prior to commencement
of construction.
A decerminacicn ihall be ~ade, by SFWMD and the
applic&nc, prior Co the commencement of
conics==ion, as Co wheChe= a Dis=rice Wace= Use
Peri=, or Pe~.~c ~odificacion, will be
for c~=cain dewace=ing accivicies proposed for =he
cons:~ccion cf project lakes and/or road
building
A: =he cite o~ peri= applica=ion, =he applicant
shall provide verification chac =he proposed
designs will =eec Dis==icc criteria in effe=c
chac
Best ~anagen~C praccices shall be ~ncluded
co~s:ruc:icm ~la~s for develo~nenc and shall be
sub~i~ed ~: ~he Coll!e~ Coun~
Develo~men: and Environnem=al Services
The S~ S=aff Impac= Assessmen= Repor~ iden=ified
five (S) i=ems of conce~ =o S~ s=aff regarding
=he proposed surface wa=er ~nagemen=
These i=ems are de=ailed on page ~, 'Surface Wa=er
here=o. These i=ems of conce~ shall be addressed
by =he applican=, ~o =he sa~lsfac=ion of =he
prior =o =he commencemen= of cons=~c=ion of
proJec=.
All in=ernal s=o~wa=er mana;emen= lakes and
conveyance di=ches, and =he prese~ed we=land area,
shall be se= aside as priva=e drainage and/or
JAN 2 8 1997 ,J 4 1997
Co
Do
Fo
for construction and operation of the proposed
surface water management system and for the
~rcpose~ wetland enhancement a~d dredge and fill
activities - from the South Florida Water
Management District (SF~D), prior Co co,~encement
of construction.
A decez~inacion shall be made, by SFWMD and
applic~nc, prior co the commencement of
consc~ccion, as co whether a District Water Use
consC~cC~on of project lakes and/or road or
building foundacions.
shall provide verification ~ha= =he proposed
designs will meet Dis=r~cc criteria ~ effect
chi: time.
Best manage=%~c prat=itel I~all be ~nclu~e~ on
co~structic~ ~:a~s for development and shall
submitted Cc the Collier County
Develo~mem: a~ EnvironmemCal Service~
Ad~inistrato= for review and a~roval.
The S~ Staff I~acC Assessment Report iden:~f~ed
five (S) icens of conce~ co S~ staff regarding
C~e proposed surface water ~nagemenc system.
These ~Cems are de:ailed off page ?, 'Surface Water
Management FcoCnoces', of the D~scr~cC staff
report, chac page being attached as Exhibit
hereto. These items of conce~ shall be addressed
by the applicant, Co the satisfaction of the S~,
prior ~o the co~encemenc of consc~cc~on of the
pro~ecc.
~1 ince~al sco~wa:er management lakes and
conveyance ditches, and the prese~ed wetland
shall ~ se: ~ll~e as ~rivaCe drainage ~nd/or
'
Ko
conservat£on easements on the recorded final plat.
S~or~ater ls~es shall ~nclude, where practical,
adequate ma!=:enance easements around the lakes,
with access to a paved roadway.
During conair=trion activities, the applicant shall
employ beat =anagement practices for erosion and
sediments=ion con=to1. These practices shall be
included in. or presented on, all conatrucclon
plans, and shall be sub,et= co approval by the
appropriace agencies prior to their implementation.
Any consCrucC~on silt barriers or hay bales, and
any anchor so!!, as well as accu~ulaced silto shall
be removed upon compleCion of cons=~cCion.
che applican~ or che encic~es responsible fo= che
specific co~s:~c~ion activit~es re~r~ng these
the~ re~ove~ =~on co~plet~on of
The final s:o~water management plan shall
consider, as a~91icable, measures =o reduce runoff
fa:es a~d vclunes, including, ~u=
grass swale ::~veya~ces. Swai~s shall b~ used,
whenever posslble, rs=her =hah closed systems.
Ten pa=cent (LO%) of ~he finished lake banks shall
be plan=ed as l~==oral zones with native emergent
or sub~ergen: a~a=ic vege=a=~cn, consis~en: with
LDO re~ire~e~:s. The applicant shall ensure, by
supplemental =~plan~ing if necessa~, a= leas= 80%
coverage of ~he plan=ed littoral shelf
maintained ova: a three (3) year per~od. Beyond
~hree ~ears, =he l~==oral shelf shall be maintained
as a functional component of ~he lake system.
The applican: shall conduct ac%ual inspections
~he IslandWal~ Mas=er S=o~wa=e= Management System
and =he presaged we=land area on
" AGENDAIT~.~
JAN 2 8 1997 'J A 1997
P~.~
keeping with the fine1 approved desi~s, and that
the water ~anage~ent syste~ ia capable
accomplishing the level of stor~water storage and
~rea~ent for which it was intended.
L. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall
undertake a repularly scheduled va~m sweeping of
all co.man streets and par~ng areas within the
private parcel owners ~ ain the development to
institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping
~heir ~espec~ve s~ree~s and/or parking a~eas.
~. The app~ican~ shall par~icipa~e in any ongoing
future efforts b~ Collier County ~o es~ab~ish
coun~-wide s:c~a~er ma~agemen~
~. D~c~ and s~a~e s~cpes sha~ be designed
· ~im~ze d~sc~arges so ~ha~ ~hese faci~i~ies
provide some addi~fona~ wa~er ~a~i~ ~rea:men~
p:ior ~o d~sc~ar~e. Tree,men: swa~es s~a~l be
p~a~ed wi~h
O. T~e grassed s:o~wo~er ~rea~me~: areas s~a~l be
~:~ed on a re~;Za~ basis as par~ of ~e no,aZ ~a~
main~enance of ~e development. ~y debris
may accumulate ~n pro~ec~ ~akes, ditches or
o~ which may ~n~e~fere wi~h ~he no~a~ flow
wa~er ~hroug~ disc~arge s~c~u~es and underdrain
s~s=ems, shall be cleaned from ~he
de~e~/Fe~e~ a~eas ~n a Fe~aF ~as~s.
P. Underdra~n systems a~d grease baffles, ~f u~l~zed
within =he IslandWalk DRI, shall ~ inspected and
cleaned and/or repaired on a re~lar bas~s. In no
instance s~all =he period be=ween such ~nspe:=~ons
exceed eighteen ~cn=hs.
Q. S=ormwa=er
system maintena~ce
recl~irements shall includs removal of any mos~ito-
productive nuisancs plant species (e.g., water
lettuce, w&:er hyacinth, cattails and primrose
willows} from all system nodes, reaches, and
percolation basins, as well as from the lake
littoral zones employed in the system.
R. To the extent consistent with applicable
management system and environmental re~ulations,
any isolated wadin~ bird 'pools' constructed in
lake littoral zones shall be excavated to · depth
which provides aqua~ic habi~a~ for mosquito larvae
predators, such as ~ambusia a~inis.
S. Ail commi~men~s made by ~he applicant within the
~D~. and s~se~en~ su~ficien~ round info~a~ion,
rela~ed ~o 0ues~ion ~0 {General
Description), ~uesxion 14 (~a=er), 0ues~i=n
(Soils), and ~es~icn 19 {S~o~a~er ~anage~en~},
no~ in ccnflic= wi~h ~he above s~ipula~ions, are
hereby inc==;cra~ed in ~his ~evelcp=en~ Crier
reference.
~. The applican~ c= his successor cr assigns shall be
fully responsible fo~ si~e-rela~ed roadwa7 and
in~ersec~ion improvements re.ired within ~he
XslandWalk DRX. The applican~ shall be re~i~ed
pa~ i~s prc;or=icna~e share of ~he cos~ for
intersection improvements {including bu~ no~
limited ~o si~naliza~ion, ~urn lanes and additional
~hrough lanes) found ~o be necessa~ by Collier
County for ~he project's access in~ersec~ions onto
Vanderbil~ Beach Road and ~an Boulevard. The
si~e access ~oin~s shall be located and developed
consis=en~ wi=h Collier County's access mana~e~en~
s~andards and pe~ic retirements.
B. The following roadways and intersections are
AGE DA ~rM .
XslandWalk DR! (S% of ~he adop:ed leve! of se.vice
capacity o! ~he roadway} and are ~orecas:ed to fall
below ~he adopted level o! se.vice standard prior
~o Project
(i} Roadways
Vanderbilt Beach Road
-Airport-Pulling Road to Oaks Boulevard
-Vanderbilt Beach Road/Airport-Pulling Road
-Vanderbll~ Beach Road/Oaks Boulevard
-Vanderbilt Beach Road/;,o~an Boulevard
oVanderbilt Beach Road/C~
Adequate commitments to provide the necessary
improvements, including but no~ limited ~o0 right-
of-way, cos~ of si~nalixa~io~, turn lanes, and
o~her improvemen:s deemed necessary by Collier
County to maintain the adopted level of service
the slgnlfican~ly impa~e~ roadways and
intersections specified in Conditio~ ~.B. hereof
shall be ma~e ~7 Collier Court:? or applican~ as
specified herein.
Xmprovements to the facilities outlined in
Condi~ion 'B' above shall be made a~ the ~ime that
a road se~men~ or intersection ia expected
exceed the level of service s~a~dard adopted in the
local comprehensive plan. Service level
determinatio~ shall be made by Collier ¢ouflt~. To
determine the existing levels of service
regional facilities and the need for improvements
in a timely manner, ~he applican~ shall su~mi~ a~
annual ~raffic monitoring report to Collier County,
Florida Depar~men~ of Transportation
Florida Department of Community Affaire ~DCA~o and
the SWFRPC w and a royal. The first
A~£8~A.~£M
-__ .s 0.jAN 2 8 1997 4 1997
monicoring repor~ shall ba submitted one year afcer
the approval of the Development Order for the
Island~alk D£I. £epor~s shall be submitted
a~uslly thereafter until buildouC of che
The annual craffic moni~oring reporc shall (a= a
minimum) contain cbs following information.
(i) PM peak hour turning movement counts ac all
sire access points on=o Vanderbil= Beach Road
and ~ogan Boulevard and the off-sics
in=erseccions iden=ified in Condi~ion 3.B.
above.
(ii} ~sC$~a:ed ex~s:~g ~e~e~J o~ le~ce
intersections and on Che ~oad le~enc
identified in Condition 3.B. a~ve.
{iii) Es:i~aced future levels of le~ice ac che
in:ersec:ions and on the road
idenxified in Condicion 3.B. a~ve, baaed on a
c~e year prcJec:ion of fu:ure volumes.
(iv} ~ es:i~a:e c~ the PrcJe::'l exisci~g
genera:ion.
The ~nual C~da:e and Inve~::~/ Repor~ (ATiR}
referen:ed In Co,dS:ion 3.~. sba11 lubscicuCe for
~he es=ima=e o~ exis=ing levels o~ ee~ice on
moni=o=e~ roadwa~ se~en=.
In =he even= =ha= no reeiden=ial dwelling uni=s are
occupied wi=bin =he DRI, a le==er documen=ing
developmen~ sca=us on-sire may be considered an
acceptable replacemen= =o che above =raffic
moni=oring for =ha= year.
The above =raffic moniCo=lng repc==, in co~ina~ion
wi=h =he ~nual ~da=e and Inven=o~ Repot=
referenced in Condi~ion 3.H. hereof, =ep=esen=e =he
a~ual =raffic mcni=oring re~iremen=s for
IelandWalk.
~ased on
the cranspor=a=ion assessmen= of
JAN g 8 1997
.,. bL
si~nificanc pro,eot impacts, conBtruction of the
following transportBtion improvements or acceptable
alternativeB Bhall be needed coincident with
development of the IslandWalk DRI. if &dopted level
of Bervice conditions are to be maintained througB
buildout (2002) on siqni£1can:ly impacted regional
roadway se~en~ and intersectionB.
vandefbil~ ~each Road
-A~rpor~-~ll~g Road to Oaks B~lsvard
Vaflder~il~ Beach Road/Airpc~*Pulliflg Icad
Va~erb~l~ beach hd/Oak~
vande~hil~ leach Road/~a~
The applicant shall mitigate i:s impacts on the
regional and local roadway and intersections
identified herein as follows:
{i) The A~licant shall make or pay for the Bite
reis:ed i~provementf speciiied in 3.A. hereof.
share of intersec~ion i.r~rovementa at its
a::~ss points to public roalways spec!fie! in
3.A. h~reo!.
(iii) The Applicant shall be BubJect to all
lawlully adopted transports:ion impact fees.
(iv) The A~plicant shall be sub, eot to the
Concurrency~anagement System o~ the County as
se: for:h herein.
The re;i:nal ro&d~ay se~ents and intersections on
~hich this pro, eot has significant impacts are
~holly v£~hin the Jurisdiction of Collier County
for pu.~oses of concurrency management. The
has made ~he decision co plan for and manage the
impacts al this DRi ~hrou~h i~s duly adap:ed
co~rehensive plan. The County has considered the
re,lanai roadway semen, s and regional roadway
Ho
and has dstermined to require the pro~ect to be
subject to and to co~ply with the Concurrency
Management Sys~e~ (CMS) of Collier County as
adopted in its Growth Management Plan and
implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities
Ordinance (APF) Ordinance No. 93-82, as amended,
which is incorporated by reference aa Exhibit
After due consideration o~ the alternatives, the
County has determined that to require compliance
with concurrency as ~andated by the CMS, in
addition to the other ~t~gatiofls re.ired ~n 3.F.
hereo~, ~s the appropriate way to acco~odate the
t=anspor~ation facilities ar~ provided concurrently
with the transportation ~mpacts of th~s project.
The Ade~a=e Public Facilities Ordinance
reTuires the Growth Management Director =o co. lets
an ~nmual U~da=e amd Inven=o~ Report (AUIR)
AuTos: 1st of each year on roads and public
facilities ~ased on the adopted level of ~e~ice.
The a~pllcam= shall ~rovi~e within fifteem (1~)
days of puMl!ca=Icn each year a copy of said A~iR
on =he regional facilities se= forth in 3.B. =o
S~PC and =he D~.
The Board o~ County Co~issioners is re.ired by
=he APF =o es=ablish~eas of Significant Xnfluence
(~I) around any roa~ se~en= or intersection which
is opera=lng a= an unacceptable level of
(~S) or is projected =o operate a= an unacceptable
~S and is no= scheduled for i~rovemen= in ~he
Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the
Co=prehensive Plan in a ~anner and time which would
provide facilities concurrent with ~he impacts of
development pursuant =o =he APF. Projects within
=he bounda=ies of an ~I are, with few exceptions
JAN 2, 8 1997
not relevan~ herein, prohibited from obtaining
further Cer~£fica:es of Public Fecili:y Adeqvacy
that would allow impacts to exceed the remaining
additional impacts to the deficient or potentially
deficient facility. The applicant shall notify
SWTRPC and DCA within five iS) working dsys after
receipt of notice of a p~blic hearing to
the boundaries of ~ny ~l on ~ny f~cili~ies
in S~c:ion 2.B. h~reof.
~i any of the road semen, s or in~ereec~ions
~den~f~ed ~n paragraph 3.B. become deficient, the
County shall establish an ~ea of S~f~canC
Influence around such ee~en~ pureuan~ ~o criteria
se= for=h in =he A~.
In add!rich =o =he provisions of =he Collier
APF Ordinance:
(1) The IslandWalk DRI is sub]ec= =o =he specified
=e~i=emen=s of =he Ade~a=e Public Facili=ies
O=~!nance No. 93-S2, as =ha= Ordinance exis=ed
cn =he effe::ive dare hereof. ~ anend~en=
=c =he =ranspor=a=ion pot=ions of =ha=
Ordinance by Collier Coun=y shall no=
effec=ive or applied ~o =he D~I unless and
un=il =his Developmen= Order is amended =o
in=o~cra=e and render applicable such changes
or amendmen=s ~o =he APF Ordinance.
(ii) In =he even= char Collie= Coun=y desi~a=es an
~X around a deficien= road se~en= =ha=
predic=ed =o be subs=an=ially i~ac=ed b~
IslandWalk, and =he ~l does no= include ~his
DRY, =hen =he applican= shall ~ re~ired =o
file a No=ice of Change of =his Developmen=
Order wi=h Collier Court=y, =he--PC, and =he
D~, ~ursuan= =o Subsec=ion
JAN g 8 1997
~o~t~a ~tatutem.
The applica~t s~a~ file a ~ocice of r~ange
within sixty (~0) days from the date the
County creates an ASZ for such a deficient
road aeg~ent that excludes the DRI. The
applicant aha11 file with the No=ice of
Change, a current traffic analysis and other
information attempting to establish that the
DRI ia not having a substantial impact upon
the pertinent road segment, or other
Justification of the County's exclusion of the
DR! from the ASI. If an AS! ~a established
for any deficient road segment or intersection
lis=ed in Paragraph 3.9. of this Development
Order than does not include the lelandwalk
DRI, the DRI shall not apply for or be issued
any further Certificates of Public Facility
Adequacy un=il= (1) the Notice of Change
decision ia~ade by Collier County, if neither
DCA nor SW?~PC participates in the public
hearing on this Notice of Change pursuan= to
Subsection
and the change is adopted by Collier County,
as proposed; or (2) if aw ri=ten objection was
filed by either DCA or SWFRPC, until the
deadline for any appeal of the Collier County
decision has expired pursuant ~o Sec=ion
380.07, Florida Statutes, and no appeal has
been filed.
{iv) For purposes of =his Development Order, the
DRI aha11 be deemed to have a significant
impact upon a deficient road segment if its
traffic impacts exceed five percent (5%) of
=he peak hour, peak season adopted level of
service capacity of the roadway.
AGEND~JT£M
JAN 2 8 1997
.....
er) The County shall provide the requisite public
notice and hold a public hearing on the Notice
of Change as expeditiously as possible.
Following a public hearing, Collier County
shall amend the DRI Development Order
record its determination whether or not the
DR! is having a subs=an=iai i~pact upon the
deficient road segment or o=herwiae should not
be included within an ASI for the deficient
road segment. In making =his determina=ion,
the County shall include =he impacts resulting
from all development to occur pursuant =o the
Certifica:ea o! Public Facility Adequacy
previously issued to the DRI. The amendment
to this Development Order is appealable
pursuant to Subsection 380,06(19) and Sec=ion
380.07, £1orida Statutes.
(vi) If neither DCA nor S~,'FRPC objects in wri=Ing
=o the No=ice of Change pursuan= ~o Subsec=Icn
~S~.O6(l~)(f;, Florida Statutes, and the
change is adopted by C~11ier County aa
proposed, :he DRI may be issued Certifica:es
of Public Facility Adequac~ following =he
County's Development Order decision. If
either DCA or SWFRPC submits a written
objection to :he No:ice of Proposed Change
prior to the public hearing, =he
shall no: apply for or be issued Certificates
of Public Facility Adequacy until =he deadline
for any appeal of =he Collier County decision
has axe. ired pursuant to Section 380.07,
Florida S=atutes. and no appeal has been
filed.
Collier County and the applicant may consider other
options :o p 'pvSde, adequate commitments for needed
AGEND. A I, EM _
JAN281997,,. 7/, ,, ;97
i~rovements to transportation facilities set forth
in 3.B. hereof provided that said options ~eet the
following criteria:
¢i) The transportation impacts to the roads
intersections outlined herein shall be
addressed consistent withSWl~PC policies
said options or mitigative measures shall be
adopted in accordance with Sections 153.3220,
Florida Sta~u~es, which requires a Local
Government Development Agreement and a
commitment b~ the applicant ·nd/or the local
government to insure concurrency on all
significantly impacted regional roads.
(ii) Any s~ch option shall only be implemented
after a ~otice of Proposed Chan~e procedure
outlined above.
4. W~STEWAT£R MANAG£..~E-_NT/WAT~ SUPPLY
A. This project shall require a modification
District Permit #11-00164-W, for the proposed
groundwater withdrawals for landscape
to be approved prior to the commencenent cf
groundwater withdrawals.
B. Prior to commencement of construction, the
applicant and SF~D shall deter~ine whether the
proposed construction activities will require ·
~ater ~se per-it for certain de~atering
proposed for the conatr~ction of onsite lakes,
and/or road or building fo~ndatione.
¢. The pro~ect shall utilize ultra-lov volu~e wa~er
use plu~ing f~xtures, self-closing and/or metered
water faucets, ·nd other water conserving devices
and methods, cona£stent with the criteria outlined
in the rater conservation plan of the public supply
permit Lss~ed to Collier County Public #orks
Division, or the appropriate ·
1 GENDA EM
-
JAN 2 8 1997
pa. _ "'/,,,z.. _
~proved utility _
AG£ D rfE - ~
.. 7.._
provider, by the SD~D.
Should proposed irrigation withdrawals result in an
increase in use of groundwater from the Lower
Tamiami Aquifer beyond cuzTently approved
agricultural uses, an impact analysis shall be
required for the IslandWalk Development at the time
of permit modification application. The impact
analysis shall include an evaluation of the use of
alternative sources, such as reclaimed water,
surface water, or the water table aquifer.
The pro, eot shall obtain potable water, waatevater
treatment and, eventually non-potable water, from
the Collier County Public Works Division, if
Collier County Public Works determines that it baa
sufficient capacity to serve the project. Skould
Collier County Public Works Division determine that
it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the
project, the applicant shall either construct
interim pot&ble water, wastewater treatment a~d/or
non-po:able water facilities, or shall pcsupone
development u~til such ti~e as Collier ¢~unty
Public Wsrks' se.-wice capacity is available to the
project. Any interim facilities constructed bythe
applican: shall be constructed to Collier County
Public Works Division Standards, and shall be
dls~antled0 at the applicant's expense, upon
connection to the County fecilitiea. ~m..ether
potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non-
potable w~ter f&cilities are provided oneite or
offsite, the applicant shall demonstrate to Collier
County that adec~uate capacity is available &: the
time of final plan submittal.
As ~he Zsland~alk D~Z intends co utilize treated
effluent for irrigation, the applicant shall ensure
that onsite lakes, the preserved
JAN 8 1997
Go
Jo
K0
pursuant to applicable FD£P cr~ter£a.
Te..~porar~ septic systems may be utilized in
conjunction with cons=ryerSon and sales offices and
p~ope~ly abandoned and/or removed by a licensed
septic system ~ aC the C~me vhefl pe~anent
iflte~m wastevace~ c~eatment facilities
and p~oposed p~s, ~s applicable, fo~ ~he p~oposed
va~e~ d~s~r~b~oa ~nd vas~e~a~e~ collection
systems, and a~7 possible ons~e t~eac~en~
fac~es, sha~ be reviewed a=d approved by
Co~er County P~b~c Works C~v~s~on p~c~
commencement cf consc~cC~on.
A~ p:cab~e wa:e: facilities, ~ncl~d~ng any
possible ons~ce potable wa=er CreaCmen~
s~a~ be p=cpe=~y s~zed ~o sup~ average a=d peak
day d==es=~c de=~=d, ~n add~:~:n co f~r~
demand, as a ra:e a;proved by C~ Oo~den Oa:~
Control and Rescue
T~e lowest ~a~cy of wats: available and
acceptable shall be u~l~2ed for al~ non-potable
wa~er ~ses.
AI~ commitments made by ~he applicant, w~Ch~n
~A and subse~enc suff~c~en~ round ~nfo~ac~ofl,
re~aced co 0uesc~on 10 (~enera~ Pro~ec~
Description}, 0ues~on 14 (WaCe~ Sopp~y), ~es~on
~ (Ns=er Supply}, and 0~esC~cn ~8 (~asce~ace~
~na~emen~), and no~ ~n con~c= w~h ~he above
reco~endac~ons sha~ be ~nco~oraced as conditions
of approval w~ch~n the Collie~ County Development
Order for IslandWalk.
JAN g 8 1997
A. Collier County has de=ermined that the IslandWalk
project il consistent with the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan and that the project's one phase
development ia consistent wf:h the County's
concurrency management plans relative to public
facilities necessar~ to support the project.
6. ~£NEP~ CONSID£PATIONS
A. All commitmen~s and impact mitigating actions
provided by the applicant within the ADA {and
supplementar~ documents) that ara not in conflict
with specific conditions for project approval
outlined above are officiall7 adopted as conditions
for approval.
B. Pursuant to Subsection 38~.06(16), Florida
~=a=utes, the applicant shall receive credit for
contributions, consCguction, expansion, or
acquisition of public facilities if the developer
ia also subject by local ordinances to impact fees
or exactions ~o meet the same needs. The ~cca!
governmen~ and the develc~e~ may enter in~o a
capital con~ribu~ion fron~-en~in~ agree~en~ to
reimburse the developer for volun~arycontribu~ions
in excess of the fair share,
C. The developmen~ phasing schedule presented within
the AD~ and as adjusted ~o da:e of deve!cp~e~t
order approval shall be inco?poraced as a condition
of approval. Xf developmen~ order conditions and
applican~ co~icmenc~ inco~ora~ed within ~he
DevelopmenC Order, ~A or sufficien~ round
responses ~o miciga=e regional impaccs are no=
carried ouc as indicaced ~o the extent or in accord
wich che ciming schedules specified wichin che
DevelopmenC Order and this phasing schedule, ~hen
this shall ~- presvmed co be subsCancial deviacion .
AGE~DA~EM .
JAN 2 8 1997
for the affected regional issue in accordance with
Subparagraph 380.0~{19){c), Floc{da S~a~u~es.
If the loc&l government° during the course of
mon£tor£ng the development, ca= demonstrate tha~
substantial chan~s in the co~ditions underlying
the approval of the Development Order have occurred
or that the Development Order was based on
substantially inaccurate infor~.~tion provided by
the developer, resultin~ in addi~ional.subatantial
regional impacts, then a substantial deviation
shall be deemed to have occurred. The monitoring
checklist contained in Appendix IV shall be used as
a ~uide by ~he local gove~men~ in dece~ining
additional s.~s~an~ial ~egional i~accs.
BE XT ~ER RESOLED by ~he Board of County Co~issioners of
Collier County, Florida,
1. The Collier County Community Developmen~ and
Environnen=al Semites Administrator shall be :he local official
responsible for assuring compliance wi:h =he :evelopment Order.
2. This Development Order shall remain in effect for =em
(I0: years from ~he dace of a~o;:Icn. However, in =he event
signlfican= physical ~evelcpmen: has nc: commenced within five
years from the date of adop:ion, development approval will
=e~inate and this Development Or,er shall no ~:nger be effective.
For pu~oses of this retirement, 'si~ificant physical
deve!opmen~~ does no~ include r~ads, drainage ~ landscapin~ bu~
does include cons~c~ion of buil~ings o~ ins~a~a~ion of u~ili~ies
and facilities such as sewer and wa~e~ lines. This ~ime period may
be ex~ended b~ ~he Board of County Commissioners upon a sho~ing of
good cause for ~he dela~ in commencemen~ of development.
3. The definitions ccn~ained in Chap~e~ 390, ~lorida
~a~u~es, shall control ~he interrelation and cons~c~ion of
~e~s of ~his Developmen~ Order.
4. Pursuan~ ~o Subsec~icn ~80.06(1~)(c)3, Florida
chis projec~ is exe~p~ from do~-zoning o~ in~ensi~y o~ density
JAN g 8 1997
,,,.
reduction for a period of ten (10) years from the date of adoption
of the Development Order, subject to the conditions and limitations
of said Subsection of the
S. The applicant or its successor(s) in title to the subject
property shall submit a report annually, commencing one year from
the effective date of this Development Order, to the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, the SWFRPC, and the DCA.
This report shall contain the information ray, ired in Section
2.025{?), ~LT~. This report shall be
prepared in accordance with the 'DR! Monitoring Format', as may be
amended, provided by the SW~P¢. Failure to submit the annual
report shall be governed by Subsection 3S0.06(18),
6. The approval granted by this Development Order is
limited. Such approval shall no= be construed to obviate the duty
of the applicant to comply with all other applicable local, state
or federal pernitting procedures.
7. I= is understood that any reference herein to any
governmental agency shall Be construed to mean any future
instrumentality which may Me created or desigr, ated or successor in
in=eras= to, or which otherwise possesses an? of the powers
duties cf any referenced govern=eats! agency in existence cn the
effective date of this Development Order.
S. Appropriate conditions and commitme=ta contained herein
may be assigned to or assumed by the lslandWalk Community
Development Dis=riot.
9. In the event tha~ e~y portion cr section of this
Development Order is de=ermined to be invalid, illegal, or
unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall in no manner, affect the remaining portions of
this Development Order which shall remain in full force and effect.
10. This Development Order shall be bin~ing upon the County
and the Developer, their assignees or successors in interest.
This Development Order shall become effective as provided
11.
by law.
JAN 997 1 97
12. Certified copies of this D~velopmen~ Order she1! be
provided to the DCA and She SW~RPC es provided in Subsection
380.05(25)(g}, Florida S=a~u~es.
Co~issioner offered she foregoing Resolu~ion
and moved i~s adoption, seconded by Comm£ss~oner
and upon rs1! ca1! the vote vas:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
DONE A~D OR~£RED this
.... day of January 1997.
BOAJ~DOF COUNTY CO~MISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
bWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM A.%'D
LEGAL SUFFICIF_NCy:
YARJ081£ M. STUD£.;T
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTOR.%'EY
TZHOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAZF~!~'~
JAN ,3 8 1997
£xh£bi~ ~D~
O~ ~he
AGENDA.ITEM
JAN g 8 1997
AGENDA LTEM,
rX:~B~T sA*
All of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 2~ East,
County, Florida.
Collier
AND
The Southwest 1/4 o! the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 48
South, Range 2~ East, subject Co an easement for public road right-
of-way over and across the West 30 feeC the=eof and the South 30
feec =hereof.
The South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section
34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, and
subject Co an easement for public road righc-of-wly over end across
the West 30 feet thereof.
The ~orth ~/~ of the ~rthwest ~/4 of the Southwest 1/4 ~ Se~
34, To.ship 48 Sou:h, Range 2( East, Collier County, Florida; and
subject =o an easemen: for public road right-of-way over and across
the North 30 feec thereof and the WeeC 30 fee= thereof.
LESS ~%~ EXCEPT:
The following described property situa:e, lying end being in
Collier County, Florida:
The Scu:h 170 fee= of 6eccion 33, Township 48 Sou:h, Range 26 East,
and =he Sou:h 146 fee: of Sec:ion 34, To~T. shlp 48 South, Range 26
Eas:; by Order of Taklmg, Case No. 86-1456-CA-01-HDH, recorded in
O.R. Book 1215, Page i{62.
SURFACE WATER ~A.~AGEME.VT FOOTNOTES:
(1) Stage/storage for the project site will be deter~imed at the
time of the final design along with the flood routings and
configuration for this design.
(l) The proposed control elevation of 10.$ NGVD may be low amd
will meed to be further evaluated at the time of the ERP
application review. Control elevations amd structure
locations will also be determined at that time.
(3) The water management areas amd BMP's will be reviewed at the
time of the ERP application review to ensure that stagnation
will not occur.
(4)
(S)
Finished floor and road elevations will be determined by the
flood routings provided with the final project design at the
time of the ERP application review.
The applicant has been coordinating with Collier County
officials to determine the upstream flow areas and quantities
required to pass through or around the project site.
Oc~stream conveyance capacity, project discharge rate, and
off-site flows will be reviewed at the time of permit
application as they are interdependent and may affect each
other. Pro~ect discharges may be l£m£ted to less than the
antic:pa:ed rate due to the conveyance capacity of the
Vander~:lt aea:h Road ditch.
AGENDA ITEM .
JAN 2, 8 1997
II
!
II
il
il
JAN 2 8 1997
.~.
PI.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A RESOLLrrlON OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~KS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE WOODLANDS DRI
DEVELOPMENT ORDER, DEVELOPMENT ORDER 96-2, WHICH A_MENDED
DEVELOPMENT ORDER 86-1, SECTION 5, TRANSPORTATION, RELATING TO ADDITION
OF A ROADWAY SEGMENT FOR MONITORING PURPOSES AND TO CORRECT LEGAL
PARTICIPATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS IN ANY NOTICE OF
PROPOSED CHANGE PROCESS.
OBJECTIVE:
To correct inadvertent omissions from a recently approved Developmen! Order Amendment for the
Woodlands Development of Regional Impact CDR,I).
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, adopted Resolution 96-
4$2/Development Order 96-2, (the "Development Order") on October 22, 1996, which amended the
Development Order 86-1 for the Woodlands Development of Regional Impact; and The Florida
Department of Community Affairs (the "Department") notitled County staff and the applicant that the
Development Order amendment as adopted did not contain certain changes that had been agreed upon
by applicant and were inadvertently omitted from the amended Development Order.
Consequently, this further Scrivener's error amendment became necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
],,lone
AG£NDA.IT£M -
JAN 2 8 1997
III I I II II II III I III I IIIII i i
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
That the Scrivener's error amendment as described by the Resolution made a pari of this executive
submission be approved.
PA ' Y
~oN.~'LD NINO, AICP DATE
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP
SER~TMENT DIRECTOR
DATE
DATE
C~'VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISIRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS.
DRI-96-2 EX SUMMARY/pd
2
.o.
JAN 2 8 1997
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION Or THE BOARD O£ COUNTY CO~2~,ISSIONERS O£
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER*S ERROR
iN THE WOODLANDS DR! D~VELO~ENT ORDER, DEVELOPMENT
ORDER 96-2, WHICH AMENDED DL~LOI~,£NT ORDER 86-1,
SECTION S, TRANSPORTATION, P~LATIIIG TO ADDITION OF A
ROADWAY SEGMENT FOR MONITORING PURPOSES AND TO CORRECT
LEGAL PARTICIPATION BY THE DEPARTMENT or COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS IN ANY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHA~IGE PROCESS.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Corr~lssioners of Collier
Cou.-.ty, Florida, adopted Resclu:ion 96-4~2/Development Order 96-
2, (:he "Development Order") on October 22, 1996, which amended
the Development Order 86-1 for The Woodlamds Development of
Regicnal Impact; and
"De;a::men:") notified Coun:y s:aff and the ipplicam~ the: the
Development Order amendment as adopted did not contain certain
chaz~es that had been agreed =p:n by a~pl~cant, County staff, and
the De~ar:ment; and
W~ER~S, ~t was discovered that the agreed upon changes that
~ad been reviewed and approved by the Depa:tme~t, Southwest
rlo:!da Regional Planning Council, and County staff were
inadvertently omitted from the amended Development Order~ and
WHER~S, said correction cons=itutes a scrivener~s error.
NOW, T~EREFORE, BE ~T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF cowry
CO~ISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, ~RIDA, that:
SE~Z~ ~: S~'S ~OR ~S TO ~S~RTATI~
SE~I~
Section S.b.{7)(ii~), Transpor:at~on, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
,(iii)
The applicant shall file a Notice of Chance within
sixty (60) days from the date the County creates an AST
for such a deficient road segment that excludes th-
are deJc~ons.
JAN 2 8 1997
Woodlands DRI. The aoplicant shall file with the
Notice of Chan~e, a current traffic analysis and other
infor~ation attem:~in~ to establish that the DR! is ncc
haying a substantial impact u:on the ~ertlnen: road
sec~ent or other ~ustification of the County's
exclusion of the DKI from the ASI. If an A$I is
es:ablished fcr a~ deficient road seo~ent listed in
Section 5 of this Development Order that does not
include the Woodlands DRI, the DRI shall not a 1 for
or be issued any further Certificates of Public
Facilities Ad~ until: Il) the Notice o! Chan~
decision is made b._.~Collier County, If DCA did not
submit written ob~ections to Collier Coun~.~_lOUrSUant to
Subsection 3~0.0G(I~) (f~rlcztda Statutes and the
chance is ad~ Collier Cc~osed;
(2} until anneal cf such decision to ~he Florida
Land and ~ater Ad~u~Icatc:~ Com~.issicn is resolved.
SECTION TWO: SC~IVENER'S ERROR AM~ZDKZNTS TO TRANSPORTATION
SECTION
SECTION 5.B.(7) {VI), Tr&nspor=atlon, is hereby amended
read as follows:
Couhnt as ro-csed tire DRI may ~e issued Certificates
cf Public Facility Adecuacv · '' · -
.c..o~i.,~ the
c_~/b~e:ticns ~rlor to the ~ubl:c hear~licant
shall not apply for cr be issued Cer=tfica=es of Public
Facilit~_Ade=uac~ un:=l the Oead!ine fog
=he Colller Ccunt~ deoislcn has excited pursuant to
Section 380.07, Florida Statutes and no appea~ has bee~
filed.
SECTION THR~E: SCRIVENER'$ ERROR~ZNDD{ENTS TO
TRANSPORTATION SECTION
SECTION 5.A.(3), Transportation, is ~nended by adding the
following road segment to those road segments in Collier County
significantly impacted by The woodlands project:
CR 951
- Im~,okaiee Road to Boni=a Beach Road
Except as specifically modified hereby, Development Order
9(-2 shall remain in full force and effect.
~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of the Board.
-2-
3AN 2 B 1997
THZS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority
vote this day of , 1997.
· ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COLrgTY COI~.ISS2ONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Chaitm&n
Approved as to fo:m and
legal su~t£ciency:
Student
Assistant County Attorney
-3-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPT
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR MANDATORY STREET NUMBERING OF ALL
STRUCTURES AND THE ESTABLISHING OF A GRID PATTERN FOR STREET
NUMBERING.
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners adopt an ordinance that
establishes mandatory street numbering of all structures and a grid pattern for street
numbering.
CONSIDERATIONS: Florida S~ate Statute, Chapter 125, comains a provision for local
governments to adopt regulations designed to promote public health, ~fety, and general
welfare of its citizenry.
The purpose of mandatory street numbering and the establishment of grid patterns (for
street numbering) is to provide for essential emergency services such as fire, police, and
ambulance; to facilitate delivery of mail and deliveries; and to assist in locating various
points of interest throughout the County. Collier County presently has three Ordinances
relating to numbering and addressing. This ordinance will consolidate Ordinance No.'s
79-92, $1-47, and 85-68 into one ordinance for better clarification and to simplify the
procedures.
This ordinance shall provide specifications for posting official address numbers,
procedures for street naming and renaming, and street sign requirements on private streets.
The ordinance amendment was discussed by the Development Services Advisory
Committee on July 10, 1996. The Committee recommends approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve an
amendment to provide mandatory street numbering for all structures.
PREPARED BY:
Robert Salvaggio, Chs~mer Service Agent Super,'isor
Building Review and Permitting
/'~- t~ -~..~.
Date
"°'
JAN 2 B 1997
Executive Summary
Addressing Ordinance
Page Two
Building Rfv~md Permitting
Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. Division
Date
,JAN
?
8
9
10
II
12
14
16
I?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
3O
ORDINANCE NO. 97-~
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MANDATORY S'FREE'I' NLIM~ERING OF
ALL STRUCTURES AND THE ESTABLXS}IING OF A GRID PATTERN
FOR STREET NUMBERING: PROVIDING FOR STATUTORY AUT~ORI-
ZATION: PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING A
STATEM£NT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE: PROVIDING FOR DEFINI-
TIONS; PROVIDING FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR POSTING OF
OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS
POSTING OFFICIAL ADDRESS NIJMBER; PROVIDING FOR SPECIFI-
CATIONS FOR POSTING OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER~ PROVIDING
FOR APPLICATION FOR NEW OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER~ PRO-
VIDING FOR COMPLIANCE RELATING TO NEW CONSTRUCTION OR
BUILDING REPAIRS: PROVIDING FOR PROCEDURE FOR ESTAb-
LISHING A UNIFORM GRID NUMBERING PATTERN FOR ASSIGNMENT
OP ADDRESSES OR CHANGE OF ADDRESS~ PROVIDING FOR PROCE-
Db'RE FOR CEANGING NON-CONFORMING ADDRESSES~ PROVIDIN(}
FOR DULY ADVERTISED PUBLIC hEARING TO RENAME A
PROVIDING FOR MONITORING OF THE NAMING OF STREETS,
DEVELOPME~'FS, BUILDINGS OR SUBDIVISIONS; PROVIDING PRO-
CEDURES FOR STREET NAMING; PROVIDING PROCEDU1LKS FOR
STREET REN~,ING; PROVIDING FOR STREET SIGNS ON PRIVATE
STREETS; PROVIDING AN APPEAL PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR
A~ROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS: PROVIDING A WARN-
ING ARD DISCLAIMER OF LIABII. IT~; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCE-
MENT A~'D PE,*IALTIES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF COLLIER
COU~TY GRDINANCE NOS. 79-92, 81-47 AND eS-6a~ PROVIDING
FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERA~ILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION
IN CODE OF IAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC-
TiVE DATE.
33 ~'HEREA£, the citizens of Collier County, Florida have
34 experienced delays in the arrival of emergency vehicles such as
35 police, fire and ambulance; and
36 W~EREAS, Collier County has implemented the Enhanced 9-1-1
37 System and incorrect addresses delays response time for emergency
38 vehicles; and
39 W~EREAS, the lack of properly numbered structures has often
40 resulted in :he mis-routing of delivery vehicles, ma~l. carrier,
41 and home delivery vehicles; and
42 ~REAS, the lack of properly numbered structures has
43 resulted in unnecessary inconven~ence, discomfort and driving for
44 persons unfamiliar with the COUNTY; and
4~ W~ER'F. AS, Section 3]&.0S, Florida Statutes, authorizes the
4~ Board of County Commissioners to name and rename streets and
47 roads; and
48 W~.ER£AS, Sections 3.2.7.1.2 and 3.2.8.3.19 o~ the Collier
49 County Land Development Code require that no stree:, subdivision
50 or identifying title shall duplicate or closely approximate the
51
I
2
4
6
9
10
12
1,4
16
21
22
2,4
2'7
29
30
33
3,4
35
36
40
name of any other street or subdivision in the inca=par&ted or
unincorporated area of Collie~ County; and
WH£R£A$, duplication of names of developments, buildings,
streets and subdivisions not only causes confusion to the general
public but can be a threat to public safety and public safety
se=vices.
NOW TH£REF0~E, BE IT 0RDAIN£D by the Board of County Commis-
sioners of Collier County, Florida:
SECTION ONE: STATUTOR! AUTHORIZATION
The legislature of the State of Florida has, in Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, delegated the responsibility to lace! govern-
mental units to adopt regulations designed to promote the public
heal=h, safety and general welfare of its citizenry.
SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT
The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
Florida, after a public hearing with due public notice, has
de:e=~..imed =hat =he public health, safe=y, comfort, good order,
convenience, and general welfare would best be served by =he
exercise cf the power granted to said Board by said Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, and the adoption of this Ordinance.
SECTION THREE: STATEHENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE
It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to promote
the pu~llc health, safety and gene=al welfare of the citizens and
persons in Collier County, Florida by requiring the posting of
official address numbers on principal or accessory structures,
establishing a procedure for numbering and renumbe=ing develop-
ments and procedures for naming, renaming and monitoring street
na~es in the uni~corporated areas of Collie= County fo= the pur-
pose of providing emergency services such as fire, police, and
ambulanceJ to facilitate delivery of mall, official notices,
goods and merchandise~ and assist in locating various points of
interest throughout the County.
SECTION FOUR: DEFINITIONS
Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in
this Ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the mean-
ing they have in com~on usage and to give this Ordinance its most
reasonable application.
Accessory Structure: An accessory structure is a structure
of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to the princi-
2 JAN 2 8 1997 I
I ises. On the same premises vith respect to accessory uses and
2 structures shall be construed as meaning on the same lot or on a
3 contiguous lot under the same ovnership.
4 Administrative Official: The Build£ng Director or his
~ Designee of Development Services is hereby designated as the
6 Administrative Official and shall be responsible for the ample-
7 mentation and enforcement of this Ordinance.
! Auxiliary Official Address Number: An official address humo
9 bet used to identify an accessory structure, a mobile home or
t0 recreational vehicle within a mobile home renta! park or recrea-
11 tional vehicle park, an apartment within an apartment bu£1ding,
12 or any other structure vhich has been determined by the Adm~nis-
~3 tra~iYe Official to require an auxiliary official address.
14 Development: The act, process or result of placing build-
I$ ings/and or structures on a lot o~ parcel of land.
~6 Emergency Servic~ shall mean, b~t no~ be limited to f~re and
I? police pro~ec~ion, ambulance service and ~he deliYer~ of medical
IS services by a physician.
19 G:id: £stablishLng a pattern of Zincs, governed by a point
~0 of or~g~n, on a map of Collier County to identify reference
2t points for the assigning of addresses.
~ Lot: ~or purposes of this Ordinance, a lo~ Lsa parcel of
23 land of at least sufficient size to meet the minimum requirements
24 of the zoning district Ln which it Ls located, for use, coverage,
~ and area, and ~0 provide such yards and o~her open spaces as are
26 required. Such lot shall have frontage on a public street or on
27 an approved private street and may consis~ of:
28 A. A single lot of record;
29 B. A portion of a lot of record;
30 C. A combination of complete lots of record, or complete
31 lots of record and portions of lots of record, or pot-
$2 ' tions of lot$ of record; or
33 D. A parcel of land described by metes and bounds.
34 Occupant: Any person, association, partnership, trust,
3~ organization or corporation, other than the owner, who is occupy-
36 ing or leasing the principal or accessory structure for a period
37 exceeding %harry (30) days.
3~ Official Address Number: The official identification number
39 assigned ~o a principal or accessory structure b
the
JAN 2 8 1997
I
]!
]2
16
1"/
21
22
23
24
2~
26
2'7
2S
29
32
24
~6
39
,dO
rive Official for the purpose of providing its expeditious loca-
tion.
Owner: Any and all persons, partnerships, trusts, organiza-
tions or corporations which own the fee title to the property
upon which a principal structure or accessory structure is
located.
~al Structure: The structure which serves as the
principal use permitted in the zoning district within which it is
located.
Private Street: Thoroughfare, used for vehicular traffic,
which affords the principal means of access to abutting proper-
ties, used exclusively for the residents therein.
Public Street: Right-of-way, either paved or unpaved, which
is intended for vehicular traffic without restriction.
SECTION FIVE: REQUIREMENTS FOR POSTING OF OFFICIALADDRE$$
The Owner or Occupant of a Lot upon which a structure is
located shall pos= an Official Address Number on the Principal or
AccessGry Structure located on said Lot, in accordance with the
requirements of this Ordinance or within ninety (90} days of the
nctlflcation of the address change as provided in Section Eleven.
In addition to posting the 0fficial Address Number on the
Principal or Accessory Structure, it shall be required that the
Owner or Occupant of a waterfront lot shall also 9cst the
Official Address Number on the seawall, on the end of a dock or
pier or on the boathouse, in accordance with this Ordinance.
SECTiON SIX: EX~24~TIONS FR014POSTING OFFZCIALADD~SSN1]M~Ei~
A. Vacant unimproved Lots upon which no structures are
located.
B.
The Administrative Official may grant an exception to
the requirements of Section £ive and Seven, after
application for an exception by the O~ner and a deter-
'mination by the Administrative Official that one of the
following may apply:
l. The architectural design is such that strict
enforcement will interfere with the function and
utility of the architectural theme of the struc-
ture.
2. In the case of multi-residential structures,
mobile homes and recreational vehicles, strict
compliance is not reasonably pose
4
JAN 2 8 1997
I
4
'7
!
10
II
12
14
25
2'7
29
31
36
3'7
39
4O
arrangement, number and location of units
involved.
3. Where unusual conditions exist or vhere the
liters! interpretation of Section Five or Seven
viii create a hardship, the Ad~tntstrative
Official may deviate from the specifications of
Section Five or Seven provided such deviation viii
not circumvent the intent and purpose of this
Ordinance.
In the granting of an exception, the Administrative Official
may spec£fy conditions and specifications upon vhtch exception is
granted.
SECTION SLe~I~T: SI~cIr~C~TIONS FOR ~ST~ O~lC~ ~D~SS
~O~BER(S)
A,
Official Address Number(s) on structures shall be
Arabic ~n design and have a minimum height of four (41
inches. Such numbers shall be mounted tn a secure
fashion to the structure's front vall or other fixed
appurtenance in the front of the structure within five
(5) fee~ of the main entry way or main path of travel
vhich ieads to the main entrance from a Public or
Private Street or shall be otherwise separately mounted
in a ~anner upon the face of a wall or fence o~ upon a
post in the front yard of the Lot.
Numbers shall be mounted at a height between four
{4) feet and ten (~0) feet above the ad~acent street
grade or exterior landing beneath, but never higher
than fifteen (15) feet above the ad~ointng grade. They
shall be sufficienti¥ legible as to contrasting back-
ground, arrangement, spacing, size and untfoz~ity of
integers so that the numbers may be read with ease
' ~uring daylight hours by a person possessing at least
tuenty/forty (20/40) vision if he viers the n~unbers
from the center line of the abutting street. The
numbers shall be so placed that trees, shrubs and other
ohs:ructions do not block the line of sight of the
n~mbers from the center of the street.
Wherever practicable and in accordance vith these
specifications, the Official Address Nt~i
placed as close to a light source as po,.
JAN
$
1997
5
I
2
4
6
?
I0
II
12
13
16
19
20
2!
22
23
2~
26
27
29
31
36
40
tO make it ~ore visible at night. If not near a light
source, the number shall be made of reflective
material.
In the case of an apartment building which contains a
series of individual apartment units within a principal
apartment building, the following shali apply:
1. The principal apartment building shall be con-
sidered as the Principal Structure and shall be
numbered in accordance with Sections Five and
Seven, A, above.
2. In addition to the Official Address Number of the
main apartment building, such number shall include
a by-line indicating the Official Address Number
of the apartment unit(s} within the apartment
building. These numbers shall be of the same size
as the principal add:ess number and shall be indi-
cated as demonstrated in the following graphic
drawing:
SEE EXHIBIT A
In the case of a mobile home park or recreational vehi-
cle park, the park and the Lois within the park shall
be numbered as follows:
1. The mobile home park or recreational vehicle park
shall be considered as the Principal Structure and
shall be numbered in accordance with Sections Five
and Seven, A, a~ve.
2. In addition to the Official Address N~e: of the
mobile home or recreational vehicle park, each
located within the park shall be given an Auxil-
iary Official Address N~eg which shall ~ indi-
cated as demonstrated in the following graphic
drawing:
SEE EXHIBIT B
In instances ~hete a main entr~ay of a structure
not clearly visible fr~ a Public or Private Street,
the Owner shall be required, In addition to the
requirements of Section rive and Section Seven, to,st
the Official Address N~et tn a conspicuous place
the drive~ay serving the structure and th~ rlg~~
dAN 2 8 1997
I
2
6
?
!
9
II
16
· l!
36
37
~8
29
40
of the Public Street or the easement line of a private
street ss the case may apply.
S££ £X~IBZT C I~OR SP£cIr:c R£OU~R~.£hTS
£. Nhetevet required by law that the Offices! Address
bet be placed on a mailbox ~n order to receive U.S.
Marl, the O~ner shall be required to post the Official
Address Number on both sides of the uallbox ia addition
to p2acing the Official Address Number off the Principal
at Accessory Structure as re,ired in this Ordinance.
r. Zn the case of a ~atetfroflt lot, the ~et shall be
:eq~ted to post the Official Address N~er off t~e
sea~a~2, the end of t~e pier or dock, or off the ~et*s
boa:Aouse according to the fo~lo~ing specif~cat~ons:
Official Address N~et(s) sha~l be ~ab~c
design and have a mtn~ height of six
~c~es. Such nu~ets shall be mounted ~n a secure
fast,on on the ~atets~de of the structure so as to
be c2eat~y v~s~b2e by pass~ng ~at operators using
the abutting ~atet~ay.
2. O~c~a~ Add:ess Nu~ets sha~ be mounted at a
~e~ght between ~out (4) feet and ten (~0) ~eet
above the abutting ~atet~ay as measured ~tom the
~a:~ona~ Geodetic Vett~ca~ Dat~. They sha~ be
su~c~ent2y 2eg~b~e as to ConttastAng background,
a:tange~eflt, spactflg, s~2e and un~fo~tty o~
gets so that the fl~ets ~y be read ~th ease
during daylight hours by a person possessing at
~east t~enty/fo:ty (20/40) v~ston ~ he v~e~s the
nu~ets ~tom ~th~n 200 feet on the abutt~flg
~atet~ay. T~e fl~ets sha~ be so p~aced that
other obstructions do not b~ock the 2~ne o~ s~ght
o~ the n~ets ~ the abutting ~atet~ay..
3. Zt sha~ be requited that a~ O~f~c~a~ Address
~u~e:s be p~aced c~ose to a 2tght source oF
o~ te~ect~ve mate:ta~s so as to be v~stb~e at
night by the operator of a pass~ng boat oF by
s~fltng a f~ash~ght on the
SECTZO~ EZGH~: ~PLZ~TZ~
Rny O~ne: requiring a ne~ Official Rddress N~r shall
apply to the Ad=intstrat~ve Official vho shall fu:nishN~
JAN g 8
!
2
3
4
6
$
9
I0
II
12
~3
14
16
I$
19
2O
21
22
23
2d
2'7
2Z
29
3O
31
32
33
3~
36
3~
39
4O
with same. To be assigned the proper street number and name, the
O~ner must provide a legal description of the subject property to
the Administrative Official.
SECTIO~ N17~Z: CCe4YLIA~ ~LATIT~G TO ~ C~~Z~ OR
All new cons~ruc~ion o= building repairs re~i~ng a County
building pe~t shall comply
Ordinance prior ~o ~he final s~ruc=u=al inspec~ion or final
building repair inspec=ion by the Inspec=lons Section of Collie=
Coun=y's Building Review and Pe~i~ing ~pa~=men~. A
ca~e of Occupancy shall no~ be ~ssued un=il ~ has been verified
by =he Addressing Section of Collie= Coun=y's Building Review and
Perm~=~ing Depaf~men~ ~ha= ~he building has been properly ~um-
bered in accordance with th~s Ordinance.
SECTI~ ~: PR~ ~R ES~LISHING
PA~ ~R ~SI~ OF ~D~S~S OR C~ OF ~D~SS
A. The following Grids are es=ablished in Collier Coun=y
for ~he assigning of addresses =o s=ruc=ures:
nor~h/sou~h and eas~/wes~. The poin~ of o=~gi~ for
~his Gr~d shall be Central Avenue and ~he Gulf of
eas[/wes[ and north/sou~h of poin[ of origin. The
in=errs1 of lines shall con=lnue:
North - [o =he Collier County line,
Sou=h - to [he Gulf of Hexico excluding Marco, and
Eas[ - to 1-75 and C.R./S.R. 951.
2. Area of Golden Gale Grid
A pattern
north/south and
this Grid shall
Gate Boulevard.
North - to
of intersecting lines running
east/west. The point of origin for
start at Wilson Boulevard and Golden
The interval of lines shall continue:
the Collier County line and S.R. 858,
north/south
South - to the Gulf of Nexico
East - to the Collier County line, and
West - to 1-75 and C.R./S.R. 951.
Area of Harco Island Grid
A pattern of intersecting
and east/west with the p~ lnt
JAN 2 8 1997 [
!
2
4
?
11
14
~?
24
3o
32
36
~o
beginning at S.R. 92 and the Gulf of Mexico. This Grid
shall encompass all of Marco Island.
4. Area of ~okalee Grid
A pattern of intersecting lines running
north/south and east/vest with the point of origin
starting at Main Avenue (S.R. 29) and ££rst Street
(S.R. 846). The interval of lines shall continue:
North - to the Collier County line,
South - to S.R. 858 and S.R. 846,
West - to the Collier County line, east line of
Range 27 and Oil Well Grade Road, and
East - to the Collier County line.
B. Odd nu.~bers will be assigned to the buildings on the
north and west sides of the Public or Private Streets,
even numbers wi~! be assigned to the buildings on the
south and east side of the Public or Private Street.
C. The assignment o~ numbers on corner lots shall be
de~ermined ~rom the Public or Private Street on which
access to the building is obtained unless unique and
unusual circumstances exist as determined by the Admin-
ls~rative Of[~cial.
D. ~n cases in which the Public or Private Street runs
both north/south and east/west, the grid direction
shall be determined by the predominant proportional
length of the ~ublic or Private Street.
£. Main arterials which pass through more than one grid
sha~l not have more than one addressing system.
F. Where more than two units exist within a building, the
entire building shall have a princlpo! number with an
Auxiliary Officia! Address ~umber for each ~ndividua!
unit, unless it is more reasonable or practical to
assign Officia! Address Numbers to each unit.
The Actministrative O~ficia! shall at his discretion,
re~inquish precedence of the specified grid system in
cases where it would be more reasonable or practical to
assign a street address based on a nu~bering system
used by a municipa~ity or subdivision.
W~ere ~e ex~sting build~ng nu~e; does no~
requite~en~s provided for by this Ordinance, the
JAN 2 8 1997
I$
16
17
20
21
22
26
27
2~
3o
31
32
35
36
40
Official shall provide a "Change of Address Notice" to the Owner
of the building. A building number shall be considered
non-conforming if it does not conform with the grid numbering
system established by this Ordinance, if the nund=er is out of
sequence with other supers on the street, or if an odd or even
6 number is on the wrong side of the Street. A "Change of Address
? Notice" shal! contain the following:
S A. The correct address number, previous number and
9 requirement that the property Owner or Occupan~ pos~
10 the nu~e= tn accordance v/th the requirements of this
I1 Ordinance within ninety (90) days fr~ the date o~ the
B.The name of the p=oper~y ~e= and legal description.
The date of the
A copy of ~he "Change of ~dd~ess Notice" shall be kept on
~[e ~n ~he ~eco~ds/~ddresstnq Section of =he Collie= County
Building Review and Pe~l~ing ~par~men[ and all ~he appropriate
agencies shall be no[iliad of the change.
Within ni~e=y (90) days from the da[e of the
Change of Address", =he ~ne= or Occupant of the property shall
conform the address n~er ~o the requirements of [his Ordinance.
S~T
Pursuant [o Section 336.05, Florida S=a=ues, the Board of
Coun=y Commissioners is au~horized to rename s=~eets and roadways
in [he unincorpora=ed areas of the County after a duly advertised
public hearing and only upon a super maJo=i=y vote of at least
four affirmative vo~es. However, State roads lying in the unin-
corporated areas of Collie= County a=e n~e=ed by the Florida
Depar[men= of Transports[ion (~T).
~S, BWI~GS OR
No s~ree=, development, building, or subdivision shall bear
=he same name or a similar sounding name as BriO=her develops[,
building, subdivision o= street in the incorporated or unincor~-
rs=ed area of Collier County, except the ~Jor s~ree[ within a
subdivision or deveiopmen~ ~y u~ilize [he sa~ name as the
development. The A~inistra~ive Official shall monitor the
naming of all s=ree~s, developments, buildings oz
order =o elimina=e duplications and avoid confusi No.
JAN 2 8 1997
10
I
4
$
6
?
!
9
I0
I!
14
16
I?
19
23
~6
~9
~6
~?
~9
At the tLme oL s~d~v~sLon p~at or sLte deve~o~enC
approval, s~tee~ names of both /n~ernal and external stFee=s
assigned ~ the developer and reviewed ~y the A~n~stzatLve
O~ficial prior to ~inal approva~ of the su~ivision or ~evelop-
ment pXan. ;he ~d~tessLng SectLon o~ the CoX~et County BuLXd~ng
Re,Lev and Pe~ttLn~ ~partment abaCI review the name to avoLd
dupl~catLon ~ street names. The ~ddressLng Section aXso has the
zesponsibility o~ ~intaining street address maps and assigning
s~zeec nu~ezs.
Requests to rename a street, both private and public, are
~a~e by su~tt~nq an application to Planninq SedUces by the
O~net/O~nets. A street can be renamed by a~y one of the
lng:
A. Renamin~ Streets by ~etition
Applican: mus~ first verify ~lth ~he Addresstnq/Reco~ds
Section of the Collier County Building Review and Per-
mit:in~ ~paztmen: ~hat ~he prcposed stree~ name is
a duplica~ion.
A peri:ion of f~fty percen~ plus one of the prop-
er;y owners abutting the street to be zen~ed may be
submitted to Planning Services with the necessary
application, site plan of the street to ~ renamed and
a list of all property o~ets abutting the street to be
renamed. The application shall include: (~) peti-
tioner's name, address and telephone numar, (2) leqal
description or location of the street, (3) present
street name, and (4) reason for ze~estin9 n~e chanqe.
Applicable a~inistzative fees in accordance with Fee
Resolution No. 95-642 or its successor Resolution are
kequired for each property o~er ze~izing notification
of the proposed street name chanqe.
B. Renamin~ of Streets Where ~plicate Names Exist
The A~inistrative Official or his designee can submit
an application to the Board of County Co~issioners for
a street name chan~e ,here the public hea~th, safety
and 9eneral welfare wou~d be affected by the existence
of a duplicate street name.
JAN 2 8 19 7
1
4
6
7
8
9
1o
II
12
14
17
18
19
20
24
26
29
30
22
24
26
~9
40
of street name.
Upon submittal of a petltLon, application or request for
street renaming, the Administrative Official determ/nes if the
proposed name Is tn conflict with any existing street name and
verifies the ownership of the property ovner(s) requesting the
street name. Zn determining if the proposed name is tn conflict
with existing street names, the Administrative Official reviews
for duplication, assimilation and if portion or portions of
street name has been used repet/ttvely.
Upon reasonable review of the pet/t/on, application or
request of street rename by the Administrative Official, the
Planning Services staff will schedule a public hearing before the
Board of County Commissioners, not/fy the property owners abut-
ting the street of the proposed street name change, and make a
reco~=endation to the County Hanaqer's Office. Notification of a
public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners shall be
given to abutting property owners fifteen (15) days prior to the
public hear£ng.
After a duly advertised public hearing and upon the Board of
County Co.~mtsstoners, approval, the A~tntstrattve Offtcta! will
notify all appropriate governments! agencies and property owners
abutting the street being renamed.
The Addressing Section has the responsibility of maintaining
street address maps and assigning street numbers.
SECTZON S/X~.:E~: PROVI'DE FOR fl'R,KET SZG~S OII IvR/%rATZ S'I'3t.~ETS
Zn the case of private streets, Lt abel! be the
Owner/Owner(s) responsibility to provide for the street sign dis-
playing the new approved street name in accordance with the
United States Department of Transportation and Faders! ~tqhway
Administration (U.S.D.O.?.F.H.W.A.) '~anual on Ontform Traffic
Control Devices".
A. The Co/i/er County Code Enforcement Board sha!! hear
and decide appeals from the requirements of this Ordi-
nance when there is a disagreement of an tnte~reta-
tion, zequtrement, or determination made by the Admin-
istrative Offlc£s! in the enforcement ~ -~,q~,~s~(~
of this O~dtnance. Such appeal shall fll~.~
JAN 2 8 997
Street Renaming by Board of County Commissioners
The Board of County Co~taatoners may tequesta change
! Code £nforcement Board within ten (10) days of the
2 disagreement, decision or dete~minacion and the
3 aggrieved person shall furnish a copy of such appeal to
4 the A~inistrative Official.
~ B. The applicable filing fee in accordance with Fee Reso-
6 lution Ho. 95-642 or its successor resolution is
? required for each appeal.
! C. Any person adversely affected by the decision of the
9 Collier County Code Compliance Enforcement Board may
l0 appeal such decision to the Circuit Court, as provided
Il by law.
]3 A. This Ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or
]4 impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed
I~ restrictions. However, where this Ordinance and
16 another conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more
l? st:in;ent restrictions shall prevail.
15 B. In the interpretation and application of this Ordi-
19 nance, all provisions shall be: (1) considered as
20 minimum requirements; (2] liberally ¢onst~ed in favor
21 of the governing body; and (~] deemed neither to limit
]2 nor repeal any other powers granted under State
23 Statutes.
2~ The degree of protection re~ited by this Ordinance ~s con-
26 side,ed reasonable rot re~ulatoty purposes. This Ordinance shal~
27 .not create l~ability on the part of Colllet County ot by any
2; officer or employee the=eof for any damages that result from
29 reliance on this Ordinance or any a~in~sttat~ve decision law-
~0 fully made thereunder.
35 SECTI~ ~: ~~ ~ ~TIES
32 A. ~ny person or entity who violates any provision of this
33 Ordinance shall be punished as provided by law.
34 B. In addition to the criminal penalties provided by law,
3~ power Is heceby authorized to institute any appropriate
36 action or proceeding including suit fo~ ~nJunctive
37 relief in order to prevent or abate violation of this
3, Ordinance.
39 SEC~ZOH ~-0~: ~
JAN 2 8 1997
24
27
28
29
JO
4O
42
I Collier County Ordinance Nos. 79-92, 81-47 and 85-68 are
2 hereby repealed in their entirety.
3 ~C~ZC~T ~-~q~O: CCqi72,ZCTA,k'D
4 In the event this Ordinance conflicts ~lth any other otdi-
S nance o~ Cold,et County ot other applicable 2a~, the more
6 restrictive sba22 apply. Z~ any phrase et port,on
7 ~ance ~s held ~nval~d ot unconst~tut~ona~ by any court
I petent ~u:2Jdlctlon, such port,on ihs22 be deemed I separate,
9 ~lst~nct, a~d independent provision and ~uch hold~ng aha22 not
~0 a~ect the validity o~ the remaining
I] s~z~ ~-~: ~S2~ ~ ~Z O~ ~S ~
I~ T~e ptov~s~ons o[ t~Ls O;d~nance s~a~ become and be made a
13 ~a~C ~ ~e C~e o~ ~avs and Ot~L~a~ces o~ Co~Let
14 Florida. The sections o~ the Ordinance may be ren~ered or
l~ :eletteted to accomplish auch~ and the ~otd ~otd~nance~ ~ay be
~e c~a~ge~ :o "~ec:~on~, ~a:tlcle~, ot any other appropriate
~ASS~D A~D DULY A~TED by the Board of County Co~lssioners
~f Collier Court:y, Florida this _ day of , 2996.
ATTEST: BO~D OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONZRS
DWIGHT ~. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, ~RIDA
Approved as to foz~
and legal sufficiency:
Heidi r. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
By:
· Chairman
14
AGE.NC)AFl'EM.
,,JAN 2 8 1997
2222 STREET S.W.
APARTMENTS
44 THRU 55
OFFICIAl, ADDRESS
~Krt~ER OF
ACCESSORY STRUCTI~r.
AG£~D~ ITEM %
JAN 2, 8 1997
2222
STREET
LOT 33
I~'MBER AND ~'P. EET
, ~ N,~MK OF MOBILE HO~E
OFFICIAL ADDRESS
NU~BER 0F INDIVIDUAL
MOBILE H0~E ~ITHI~
THE MOBILE HOME PARK
"°' ~~
JAN 2 8 1997 |
2222
STREET
LOT 33
OFFICIAl, ADDRESS
,N~'M~ERAI~D~
JNAME OF MOBI. LE HOME
PARK
OFFICIAL ADDRESS
NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL
MOBILE HOME WITHIN
THE MOBILE HOME PARK
~--2' MAX. ---~
MA~ ~GHT 3' Ae0VE GROUND
I
~r oF P~'euc o~. P.WZVAT~ srmm~ 2222 ~.*'T. e w
I "-.i.(~I~NDA ITEM
J JAN281997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS
TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ADOPTED BUDGET.
OBa'ECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution and
the related amendments which amend the Fiscal Year 1995-96 adopted budget in accordance
with Section 129.06, Florida Stattrtes.
CONSIDERATIONS: Section 129.06, Florida Statutes defines how an annual budget, as
adopted by the Board, can be amended. Budget amendments that increase the total
appropriations of a fund over the adopted annual budget may be approved by resolution of the
Board of County Commissioners a.tier an advertised public hearing. Budget amendments
requiring such approval include the appropriation of carry forward, interfund transfers, and
supplemental revenue.
This is a public hearing to amend the budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96.
The attached resolution and the summary of the resolution have been advertised and have been
available for public review and inspection with the related budget amendments and executive
summary at the Office of Management and Budget. The amendments and summary are
included herein by reference in the resolution.
FISC4~L IMPACT: The amendments and executive summaries which were previously
considered and approved by the Board contained their respective fiscal impact statements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the attached resolution amending the Fiscal
Year 1995-96 adopted budget.
PREPAREDBY: ~ ~
Robin Bialkoski,.Senior Secretary
BY: /t7 ~ ~ ~~ - Date: /"-/~- ~,~
Michael Smykowski, Management and Budget Director
AGENDA ITEM
so.,
JAN 2 8 1997
Pi. I
COUNTY OF COLLIER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND
ITS FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ADOPTED BUDGET
All interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held on January 28,
1997 at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioner's Boardroom, 3rd Floor,
Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples,
Florida.
A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions and background material will be available
for public inspection on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the Office of Management
and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building.
A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting.
Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose.
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County Commissioners
By:/s/Sue Barbiretti, Deputy Clerk Collier County Florida
Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman
Budget
Amend. Fund Change Fund
No. No. Fund Title Amount Total
96-514 411
96-516 413
96-522 521
Water Capital Impact
PURPOSE:. To move water capital
projects funds to correct impact fee funds
and to adjust carry forward and impact fee
revenue estimates.
County Sewer Impact Fees
PURPOSE:. To move wastewater capital
projects funds to correct impact fee funds
and to adjust carry forward and impact fee
revenue estimates.
Fleet Management
PURPOSE: To recognize additional
estimated revenues and expenses for parts,
sublet repairs, and fuel.
39,500 5,406,400
409,800 9,445,400
150,000 2,408,300
AGENDA ITEM
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg.,
Budget
Amend.
No.
Fund
No.
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
96-523
96428
96-531
96-537
96-542
96-555
96-556
96-565
001
589
001
121
001
301
299
326
General Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate building
maintenance services revenue.
OCPM
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
for computer hardware and soft-'are and
building improvements.
General Fund
PURPOSE: Partial repayment to General
Fund for initial seed money to set up the
OCPM Department.
Urban Improvement Grants
PURPOSE: To reimburse Department of
Community Affairs for program income
received.
General Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate private
contributions for a scoreboard for the
ENCP Roller Hockey Facility.
Facilities Management CIP
PURPOSE: To recognize additional
revenue from fire districts and internal
users based on final 800 MHz radio
equipment purchases.
Commercial Paper Debt
PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer to
pay interest on 800 MHz debt service.
Naples Park Assessment Project
PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer of
loan proceeds for Naples Park Drainage
Project.
40,700
512,722
200,000
1,907
3,526
442,000
225,000
3,000,000
101,232,888
4,358,606
101,432,888
66,321
101,436,414
25,282,851
7,610,500
3,000,000
AGENDA ITEM
No.
JAN 2 8 Lq,97
r'g 3
Budget
Amend.
No.
Fund
No.
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
96-566
96-573
96-551
96-582
96-591
96-593
299
491
505
505
001
301
Commercial Paper
PURPOSE: To initiate construction
phase of Naples Park Drainage Project.
Loan proceeds will be obtained through a
commercial paper draw and transferred to
capital project fund.
Emergency Medical Services Grants
PURPOSE: Appropriate interest earnings
to complete Grant Project.
Information Technology
PURPOSE: To appropriate revenues
received for remodeling and new
construction generally performed
during normal business hours.
Information Technology
PURPOSE: To appropriate additional
revenues to cover telephone charges and
maintenance and to complete phone system
switch upgrades.
General Fund
PURPOSE: To print name badges and
decals which will enable residents/owners
to re-enter an evacuated area following a
disaster.
Count)wide Capital Projects
PURPOSE: To appropriate General Fund
transfer for the Streetscape Master Plan.
3,000,000
7,520
34,900
377,700
22,000
25,000
10,610,500
186,418
1,365,800
1,743,500
101,458,414
25,307,851
AGENDA ITEM
No.,/2C5)
JAN 2 8
Budget
Amend.
No.
Fund
No.
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
96-594
96-597
96-606
96-615
96-614
96-620
191
325
602
001
491
040
SHIP Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate SHIP
program carry forward for down payment
assistance.
Water Management CIP
PURPOSE: To appropriate matching
funds for the SFWMD/BCB to conduct a
Comprehensive Basin Study.
Confiscated Trust Fund
PURPOSE: Appropriate confiscated
property proceeds to fund equipment
budgeted in FY95, but not ordered until
FY96.
General Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate the
maintenance services revenues for special
services.
Emergency Medical Services Grant Fund
PURPOSE: To purchase a pediatric seat
with interest earnings.
Sheriff
PURPOSE: General Fund transfer to
fund Sheriffs Office increased personal
services expenses.
170,000
50,000
90,000
39,600
252
604,600
1,718,400
1,378,578
835,888
101,498,014
186,670
45,537,900
Budget
Amend.
No.
Fund
NO.
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
96-628
96-630
96-632
111
301
137
MSTD General Fund
PURPOSE: To recognize revenue from
Heritage Country Club CDD application
fee to cover review costs.
County Wide CIP
PURPOSE: General fund transfer for
emergency repairs to main complex
chilled water system.
North Naples Roadway
PURPOSE: To appropriate carryfor, vard
to fund fiscal agent fees and increase
reserves.
15,000
27,445
l,lgg
12,543,636
25,335,296
1,188
AGENDA ITEM
No./~ C ('~
JAN 2 8 Lq97
3
6
g
I0
II
12
14
16
I?
II
19
2O
21
23
:26
2'7
28
29
3O
NO.
A RESOLL~ION PURSt'A.~'T TO SECTION
fLORIDA STATLT£S, TO AM£ND THE BL'DGET
FOR THE 1995/96 FISCAL
31
32
33
3~
36
37
3g
40
41
411 96-J 14 424.J00
413 96-~16 1.412,J00 ' (I,002,700)
521 9~$22 I J0.000
001 96-J23 40,700
519 96-521 Jl2,722
O01 96- ~ ) I
001 96'J42
301 96-JJ~ (Jl?.lO0) 129.100
299 96-~,6
326 96-~6S 3.0~.0~
299 96-566 3.000.000
491 96.5?3
- ! -
S,327.400
40.700
1'75.604)
3,526
217.0OO
225,000
3,000.000
12.000
(I,491..100)
337.122
20Q.O~O
I .~7
FLeD
CARRY
FORWARD
BUDGET OR INCREASE INCREASE
A.%lE~D~,I£.*gT II~TE RFL.'~D cDECI~ASEI ID£CIU:ASE!
?¢L;MBER$ I"R~NSFERS IP~CElrr EXPENDITI:R.~
/NCREASE
¢DECREASE)
RESERVES
INCIU~ASE
IDECREASEI
I%TERFL~D
TRANSFERS
$
9
10
II
12
14
17
II
19
20
21
2,1
26
21
29
30
31
32
505 ~-511 3,1.900 34.900
505 96-~12 129,600 129.~
O01 ~591 22.0013 22.000
)01 N-593 25.1300
191 96.594 170.000 170.6O0
325 96-597 25,00O
6O2 96-6O6 I I I,.10~
491 96-614 252 252
040 96-620 604,600 604.600
I I ! ¢M421 15,000 I
301 96-630 2?.445 27.445
13'/ 96-632 I I.Y/I I,I II
21,104
10.190
BE IT FURTI~R RESOLVI:D that the Cle'k b he.by ordered and db'ec~ed Io sffead this Resolution in full amo~I the
minm~ of this meeti~I for petmeen! record in his office.
l~is Re.,elulio~ adopted are matron. ~c~d and major~, vme fr, or~nI same.
DATED:
ATTEST'
DtA1GHT E. BROCK. Clerk
By:
BOARD OF Cou~r'Y COMMISSIO.%'F_.RS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR. IDA
31 A[.,f,,-o~,ed as to form and
39 lelal su f1'~c eoT:
45 Collier Cou~l~ A~lorne~.
By:
T~mod~ L. Ilancock. Chau'man
JAN 28 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS
TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ADOPTED BUDGET.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution and
the related amendments which amend the Fiscal Year 1996-97 adopted budget in accordance
with Section 129.06, Florida Statutes.
CONSIDERATIONS: Section 129.06, Florida Statutes defines how an annual budget,, as
adopted by the Board, can be amended. Budget amendments that increase the total
appropriations of a fund over the adopted annual budget may be approved by resolution of the
Board of County Commissioners after an advertised public hearing. Budget amendments
requiring such approval include the appropriation of carry forward, interfund transfers, and
supplemental revenue.
This is a public hearing to amend the budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
The attached resolution and the summary of the resolution have been advertised and have been
available for public review and inspection with the related budget amendments and executive
summary at the Office of Management and Budget. The amendments and summary are
included herein by reference in the resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: The amendments and executive summaries which were previously
considered and approved by the Board contained their respective fiscal impact statements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the attached resolution amending the Fiscal
Year 1996-97 adopted budget.
PREPARED BY:
Robin Bialkoski,.Senior Secremo'
Date:
Michael Smykowski, Management and Budget Director
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
COUNTY OF COLLIER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND
ITS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ADOPTED BUDGET
All interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held on January 28,
1997 at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioner's Boardroom, 3rd Floor,
Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tarniami Trail East, Naples,
Florida.
A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions and background material will be available
for public inspection on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the Office of Management
and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building.
A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting.
Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose.
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County Commissioners
By:/s/Sue Barbiretti, Deputy Clerk Collier County Florida
Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman
Budget
Amend. Fund Change Fund
No. No. Fund Title Amount Total
97-001 115
97-002 115
97-009 195
Sheriff's Grants
PURPOSE:. Recognize federal COPS
grant funding to combat domestic
violence.
Sheriffs Grants
PURPOSE: Recognize the SHOCAP
anti-drug abuse grant.
Tourist Development - 60%
PURPOSE: To reappropriate FY96
carry forward ofunexpended Category
"A" project funds.
195,700 1,426,670
183,957 1,610,627
926,172 10,709,944
AGENDA ITEM
No. IP.
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg.,,,
Budget
Amend.
No.
Fund
No.
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
97-011
97-012
97-013
97-015
97-020
97-024
97-026
589
301 ·
111
115
368
414
350
Office of Capital Projects Management
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
to reconfigure the office space in building
D.
Co. Wide Facilities Capital
PISRPOSE: To recognize ca~ forward
for projects not completed in FY96.
MSTD General Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry
forward to offset costs of CDD application
reviews.
Sheriffs Grants
PURPOSE: To appropriate grant award
for Collier Count3' D.U.I. Enforcement
Project.
Naples/Urban Collier County Parks Impact Fee
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
funds to complete the Immokalee
Football/Soccer Field.
Wastewater Capital Projects
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry
forward for the relocation of the sewer and
effluent lines in connection with the
construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock
Road Project.
EMS Impact. Fees
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
to complete the Corkscrew EMS Station.
30,000
34,170
55,566
227,700
49,008
10,910
16,879
3,721,200
29,495,240
13,572,128
1,838,327
3,227,016
19,624,420
626,058
Budget
Amend.
~0.
9%025
97-038
97-039
97-040
97-042
97-043
97-049
97-057
Fund
No.
301
115
602
115
368
412
111
495
Fund Title
Change
Amount
Co. Wide Facilities Capital
PLrRPOSE: To appropriate carry
forward to complete IT Office
Modernization program.
78,100
Sheriff's Grants
PURPOSE: To appropriate grant funds
for DP equipment.
202,500
Confiscated Trust Fund
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
to provide matching funds for Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant.
27,982
Sheriffs Grants
PURPOSE: To appropriate block grant
and matching funds to purchase
communications equipment.
251,831
Naples/Urban Collier County Park Impact Fees 260,000
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
to complete the Marco Island Racquet
Center Project.
County Water Capital Projects
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
to complete the Water Treatment Plant
Chlorine Enclosure.
44,308
MS'ID General Fund
PURPOSE: To recognize carry forward
to offset costs of application processing for
the Dove Point CDD.
14,896
Airport Authori~'y
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry
forward to fund supplies/equipment
forecast to be purchased in the prior fiscal
year.
9,942
Fund
Total
29,573,340
2,040,g27
210,764
2,292,658
3,487,016
13,077,916
13,587,024
1,101,584
AGENDAITEM
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
,-/
Budget
Amend.
No.
97-067
97-071
97-075
97-076
9%080
97-081
97-082
97-083
97-084
9%086
9%087
9%088
Fund
No.
490
123
152
115
325
313
331
333
334
338
339
340
Fund Title
EMS
PURPOSE: To appropriate fire district
revenue for costs of the First Respond
Medical Training.
Collier Co. Services for Seniors
PURPOSE: To reflect an increase in the
Title III-D Grant awarded to the Count)'
for providing homemaking services to frail
elderly residents.
Lely Golf Estates Beautification
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry fom'ard
to complete remaining landscape and
irrigation improvements.
Sheriff's Grants
PURPOSE: To recognize U.S.
Department of Justice award for the
Church Arson Prevention Program.
Water Management CIP
PURPOSE: To recognize Big Cypress
Basin Board contributions for canal and
basin studies.
Road Construction Gas Tax CIP
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
for ongoing projects.
Road Impact Fee District 1
Road Impact Fee District 3
Road Impact Fee District 4
Road Impact. Fee District 8
Road Impact Fe~ District 9
Road Impact Fee District 10
PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward
for ongoing road projects initiated in
FY96, but not completed prior to the end
of FY96.
Change
Amount
29,177
1,308
72,800
4,600
85,000
1,863,879
1,195,017
824,405
122,419
539,362
276,893
33,658
Fund
Total
7,573,554
284,308
248,700
2,297,258
2,645,200
16,912,858
8,745,434
4,875,410
1,228,938
2,195,824
831,886
120,816
AGENDAITEM
No.~
JAil 2 8 1997
Budget
Amend.
No.
97-093
Fund
No.
I01
Fund Title
Road and Bridge
PURPOSE:. The transfer from the
Oeneral Fund is decreased due to the
recognition of an additional $41,300 in
FDOT sweeping and mowing
reimbursement revenue.
Change
Amount
Fund
Total
7,707,000
AGENDA ITEM
JAN 2 8 1997
pg. ~ _
RESOLt'TION NO. 99.BAR-2
A RESOLLTION PL'RSUA.~T TO SECTION 129.06t2),
FLORIDA STATLTES, TO AMEND THE BUDGET
FOR THE 199~-97 FISCAL YEAIL
9 WHEREAS. Section 129.06(2). Florida Sutmes. provides ~a~ ~e Beard of Count,. Cemmissieeefl (l~ereinafl~
10 also referred m m 'Board') a~ my time ~.tthln a t't~il ye~t may amend a budge~ fm ~a~ ytat, and ~ ~ ~
19 I~oJut~l put-,~nt to Sectme 129.06, FIo~la Statues.
20 NOW, 'f14~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY ~ BOARD OF COLrNTY COMM1SSIONI~RS OF COLLIER
21 COL.~TY, FLOIUDA, that the budle~ m~e~dmenu m ~e 1996~T FY B~lle ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
24 f~CREASE
25 ('DECREASE)
26 CARRY
29 FORWARD
28 BU13GET OR
29 A .~,~NDM Lr~'T
~O FL~'D 1%'U~BERS TILANSFERS
fNCILEASE I~CREASE INCREASE (DEC'RF. ASE)
(DECR~AS£) (DECREASE) (DECREASE} II,,'TER. FU%'D
RECEIFT EXPENDITURE ILESERV1~S TRANSFERS
31
32 115 99-001
33 lis 99-002
~4 19S 97*009 , 926.172
35 ~19 9T*OII
36 301 97-OI2 34,170
37 III 97-013
38 115 .97-015
39 368 99-O2O 49.00!
dO 414 97*024 lO.glO
~1 3~0 99.026 16.179
42 ~01 97-021 71,100
43 II~ 97-031
u 602 97.039 21~$2
195,?00
113,9S~
202,~00
19S.700
926.1'/2
30,000
34,190
$$,~66
227,900
49.001
31,633
16,$19
AGENDA IT.EM
No.
JAN 2 8 1997
P~,. 7
I INCREASE
2 (DECREASE)
2 CAI~Y
4 FORWARD
5 BL'IX~£T OR INCR.EAS£ i~qCREASE
6 A~DME~ ~R~D ~ECREASE) (DECEASE)
7 F~D h~MBE~ ~SFERS ~CEI~ EX~DI~
~CREASE
INCKEAS£ IDECKEASEI
(DECREASE) IN'rE RFt.'~D
KESERVES TRA,~SFERS
9 I I $ 9"/~140 2'7.98: 25
I0 :168 97..042 2~.~ 2~,~
II 412 97~3 --JOI
12 I I I ~9 J4.8~ 14,l~
13 49S ~S7 9.~2 9.M2
14 4~ ~7 ~.1~ ~.1~
IS 123 ~71 I~1 IJOI
17 I IS 97~76
19 212 ~11 1,162,1~ I
21 33~ 97~1] 824,40~ 47j94
~ ~ ~ 122.419 I
23 ~31 97~ ~29J62 ISl,977
~ 339 97~17 276.893 ~B,982
~ 340 ~ll ~,6~8 J~,030
26 101 97~3 (4tjX) 41~
27
21
29
(13.700)
20.09~5
679,2~4
';~.01 I
10.419
3l?Jl~
S4,~I I
BE IT FUrTHeR RESOLVED L~at the Cle~. b hereby ord~rd md dir~-I~d ~o ~ ~b R~ ~ ~fl ~l ~
~h R~ ~ed aflff m~ ~d ~d maj~ ~e ft~I
DA~
A~ST: ' BOA ~ OF C~ CO~SSIO~
D~GHT E. BR~K. CI~ COLLIER CO~. ~O~DA
By:
Timo~> L. Hancock.
- 2 -
AGENDA ITF. JVl,
JAN 2 8 1997
pg. o~
Ob~aottves To have tho Board of Coun':· C:nnisstoners adopt an
Ordinance a~end~ng o~d~na.~,c~ No. 89-11, t;'... ~ach and Water Safety
and V&ssel Control Ordina:,te.
COnli~t=&~lon: In 1989 the Board of ¢~u-~? Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 89-11, t~ ~aach and Kate.. .-f:ty and Ve~se! Control
Ordinance. T~s Order&:.- ~va~ned ~h¢ ~ :~ ~erso~al watercrafC
in adjoining wa=ers to a~. peach ]ocat%~.", ; ~ regulated concession
operations by private vcr.~o~s a= all
operat£cn from ~00' cff~!...'~ to 7~0'o~".
tO bathers. All pe~c:,.~i watercraft
ingtalled, quie:er than t'~e stock muffl,
aach rantar of personal %'atercraf= wil.
initial stipulations set f~:-%b in the
si:es. Tho proposed
u~rsonal watercraf=
:hereby reducing risk
~ba]! have muffler£
c~rren:ly in use, a~d
required tO read and
*~ before each use.
rfscal Im~act~ None
Recommend~tlon: Staff :ecc~rendiD~ ' the Board of County
Commissioners approv~ %' chang~ ~. ':'~h in the proposed
Ordinanca.
6/
Ga,~{ Fra~6o, F=r~s Superlnte~:-
Department of :;.r~s and Recrea.. :~
Department o[ :-arks and
Date
Reviewed
T~omas W.
Division cf r*: ":.' _.~?~erviceo
17774
t
!
/
!
$
!
I
prehlbi=a the
o~ privately c.~?~....~[ s~[i and,
lndLvidual o~rate-n ~C private }e~
~I~EA$, It i:; ~ecessary to a~t.,, ·
operation et pr:v.,'., and rascal ~e~
Co[l~er County ~tc" ';'iq, th,~t the c,; ;~,
ba emended.
Cc~:'.. · County Ordinance
· :.'P. c'ot;!:TY° f~.'~:"
Wor,!s ~J~orl{r,,::' - · .r,1.; t**ctd9
' ~arees, te~ta! ~et akiu,
· '~-~ce to bathers &tld ~artd
' - ~h~el/na ~o abate t~e
· .~:a~le anfore~en~
.~;~.,nce o! irtemponsiblo
· -= =he vicinity ~
.... :r:ct:on ~ine of SOO
'.::~n of rental ~et akim,
Ordinance Ilo. CO-;i. ac amended.
Section S~ of ~::~or County Or~tr~-~ ~;o. IS-12 ~s hereby
a~onded to ro~4 a~
~ .... ~ ~d ehorsfro~: L~. ~ ~s ~e hereb~
· ;.~ : !~rceab]o re~d~ h~ner or no~ such
~r¢; :: designated by aS:: ...... ,,;e sign, buoy or
.*'o.~e? than
· nn ~ter'e edq~
~cre or except
(2)
Sa:~.'r~ft. lnctudlng
c~'',' tha~ 500 £eQ~
:.,~.L operate a ~e~.
0.<.,~: corridor
~' 'J} ~eceor,
,'." Kettles of the
,- : sp&s~ orcater
or pro~cr~y oC &fly
'.'e:.~,. corridors, 'Thc ;. '...:.; nte3e of the Gulf
~t,e -~cre nay be denlg~e." ~e being exclusively
f:? ";auel u~e betvseh ~.. r~'..i d~ik daily:
T>.oae areas of Ti~,~,:~.. '/andetbllt Deach and
c'em Pane County Pa:'.r ~r.d such ot~er parks
(4) Uc. ;;', launch o~ pease*r, r~.:.e~ed. No person
~]-.~.'~':'.3r::ea lau~¢hln9 .,:
(5) w~'~: ~kiin~. ~1o ~ers~n'. :..~:3uaLn9 t~e
(a-'.,~.~o ~2n~ to~e~ O~ ..'.' bc. hlr~fl I veneer) and
the vessel operator(a) a'~ ' v. cto: ski closer than
Sa,' (~,t ~rom ~he ad~e ~: t',< ~.each dir0ctly on the
*.~, ~lndsurf~oard=, and
',;'.~r~te · sallcrat~
Verde vnder~!~
~.c-~-~. are deletOd.
JAN 2 8 1 97
PI,,*~
:£~ CNTY PI~;'.KSa.:~EC TEL :.:..i ". *' '~-1602 -', ,.',",'~? ]$:~0:1o.0I;. F'.C4
2
4
7
8
l
',t
'7
:9
10
(7) {le.c'~:.-.rd ~rea.. lie per,on ;:.~L'- operate ·
~ot. cr:r.e-J '~:~:eeJ et' eatlcra'.'t; ',~itl~ln on .rea vhiclm
has ,... r. clearly marked by bt:aTt, el. some
dt~: :r.,.,;:uhtng device for b-',t:::in.~, swimming or
k'::ic:; t.". boon othor~JGo ro~::icLed by the County,
[~r,;'/l'..." '.hR% thJa eubeectJcr r;h,:~ not app%y in
the ¢.?,¢ of an emergency or :o n patrol or
~. Yeaae] e~¢.r.~ r..~t tO exceed roa~onet)%o ~pood under
exieti,g condttlc,:,::. ~:n.'.hing contained Jr, thJG Ordinance shall
be construed tu ,t.~:,-. 1,.... ur approve Lhe '.i', ~..,J of any ye~go1 or
iailcraft in except :;' L*.;aL ~'h/ch is rea,ezra;tie and propel'
3JnJted to, the r;': :.',cc ~! rater nkier~, L:.'~,ote, fish.tmon,
C. £xenptlor.:. T:,~ following si:all ,.-'.. ~r. eoptod fret. the
previa!one of 5~,c:. :.' 5:>; of thin Ordinance:
';ho ;.:.":'.eno o£ this Ordlr. a,'.ca ~hal! not be
cc~'..:'. :. :~ tn prohibit the c~ er.trico, racing or
~.,--; :. ;.:~,t,ly patrolle~ r;,::~tt*., ap, ed trial or
ex:. :.".:
(2) ~hc .-.....,;*orn of {,av £nfor,',...;:.t or re~cuo veaso]~
cz ,.'.': ;, .:~ operating unde£ ,..:":'~ChOy conditions
ci, r.'-..:, vy. enptod vhllo c~'.~:::.~*,Inq official duties
o: n;:.:-.'r.;l,q under o~.r0on¢7
(3) Co.,..-.,.':.':.':.' tiohing ve~ael~ :..',. o);o.~ptod vhllo
~.:.~', .::q ::eh nettin~ or.?:'~:lon~ provided the
c~-.:.'.':' ~ are conducted I~: ~- ~-~fe and
r.~r.,, ~.; tn accordance ~i'.h Section ~;lX (B),
~r,~-~ .~,,.'.sd not 'co exceed :'~'-~{onabli speed under
ex;;. L j c'~JndJt*-onm. Undo% r,n circumstance.,
ho'~':'.-.. ~.'.al'- cot.~norclal t::;hin9 vo~ol, be
o2:.::..:n ,,: greater than tale upeed vlthin five
hun.'.."cr; .'set (500 feet) o,'
~I:CTIOT{ ~WO: Ar.,:r.:!;.:. :,:c :o Section Seven c~ Collier County
O:,!l.,-.'-.Y .gu. 0g-IX0 aa
Section Seven ~: CoLlier County Ordinance {[o, Ig-~x ia
hereby a~anded to .-::aJ, aa
The ,afety ,,al -,-!!are o~. the persona ~]~,mt reside nearby the
County'e beach e:~,~- ..-.J cf tho public th~C ."ccreate on the beach
end adjel,lng v.'aL'krs :aa;:~o nlCellar7 and -'y?;'opl'!ate the
fei lo--lng regular lc:::;
A. BeeCh Vur,.:~. Pt,~.~Jt ~iequlremen:. ,'dl~.' per.on engaged Jn
tho rental, lee~lr.:.;. :;'.'-'].~ent for conslde;,-:iun, or o:hervise
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg, ~'~', , _ _
providing t r~,n,,; '..
~ron the County.
nn~n~a~nod upon ~L
~horo~or as est.~.'.
tho ~a~ouing ~;H' ·
he~q,:.
tho v,,
(5) Th~ ..; .
Any ;,;.. ',
thefts..
(51 ~.~ %.. :
,.'. ;'o,dor rere[t al,..:i l,uuu and bo
;:!ca,L pnyinci cuah ~::i,lic,sLl~ :aa
;G' Lbo Couct7 b7 : ..... lu~icn a~a
'' .,:.~ted at a la~'~'~:,..'.~ location
p:=,:lc uae.
: /~.a office.
, ,.~be t,oat viii,
· ..:n:,j n~ con, it Jori
/', ;':Ir*mant'~ kept ~t.
..:
:t I,l~co In ~orvlc. u.
.',, for public uue
;',"~: :S~uOd sha~l
·:{Lrod :c O.~.thi:', ,: ',,.'at'.,' occupa%ione!
..-o ~ffJce roilulr(:.' .;J.:l~,." Goatlon &oven or
thlu Ordinan~u. : .. ~:"..~ ar) occ~.pa~.iun,~l .;ce.~{e, the al~plLeant
provide p:'u:,; '-: .,,,/in3 a curcon*., ,,.~1 id Ua. ach Vendor's
Per, i:.
~. Ueach '/,'~'':.: ?¢t'~'itteo/Vooael Uu~;' :'¢~,lallone
~1'~¢- '.'. ,'.n, or o~erntion of ,. ao',orJP, ecl
[~.~) ....: t'~ ~ho provl~lo~ o~ ~.,c~on Seven o~
(36~ ....,r uf n~e except f~,l ~:i~]~,e chJJdr-n blt~vun
t~'c'l'/,' ~I:~ and {IG) ycnr~ ,~f CU~ ~ho ~a7 operate
~O:,;: .~,.-:v~aor over the ~;~- :~ :'.'an:y-one {21)
-4-
~ords Uq~erl[no~ a~Je~; ~ords e~ruck-c:,rou;h aro deleted.
.i L,t..',_ e/Lo_el!ii, e ~ r.,.
_CDf.-"r fro." ·"
_ ' :;' ~._L:," ~,h~iLi_:.,'
... ;'.'L,; P. r 1 .'..' L,; ....
,;,:..te~. -na =",," ·
..... '.'.
In tho cvol,*. . · . '::'.-.:nnnce conIllctr, :if, ,,:l}' othor
ordJ~mnc~ of Cola[,,;' ,,:a~y or other appl~c.'... :(, l~v, tho ~ore
restrictive 'eh~ll ., :' .( any phraDo ,< ;-;:ti:m Of tho
Ordinance Lo hcl~ ;::.': :: . ,~:. un~onmtltutl,,~.. : j,~. any court of
diatinc: and.r;,..:,* ' "-' ' l'. ovi{;-~on a,stl au.':...'.'.'.;ll;..q at,a~] not
tho vail,IS-: , .;., :u,a~:ninr/ ~us'.'.~ .
Agenda
JAN 28
I
~11o provl Git, p*
Floridd. 'the u,,~t.:. .
t:¥ .................
I'/~ put. y Clerl~
CNA t F.~tAN
-G-
· ." t,,..',; ~'ordG st"t'ucl,---~chr-~,,te.,h ere ~eleted.
.o.~1
JAN 2 II 1!i97
RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT THE COLLIER COUNTY
FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE NUMBERS
OF FALSE BURGLAR ALARMS IN UNINCORPORATED
COLLIER COUNTY
~ To have the Board adopt a new False Alarm Ordinance.
~ The SherifFs Office is requesting that the Board adopt, for the first
time, a "False Alarm Ordinance" intended to significantly reduce the number of wasteful
responses by CCSO Deputies to false burglar alarms. During the past five (5) years, false burglar
alarms in unincorporated Collier County have accounted for more then ninety-eight percent
(98%) of dispatched Deputy Sheriffs' responses to burglar alarm calls. A substantial majority of
false alarms should be preventable by means of responsible oversight by owners of the respective
burglar alarm systems. Reduction in the numbers of false alarms should free CCSO Deputies for
constructive responses to real emergencies rather than preventable false burglar alarms. Also,
elimination of false alarms heightens officers' reactions and awareness in the expectation that a
dispatched alarm call is more probably a "real" emergency and not just another time wasting
false alarm.
~ Although administration of this Ordinance will, at least initially, consume
considerable staff time, especially by the staff of the Clerk of Courts, the expected substantial
reduction in false alarm responses by Deputy Sheriffs, along with the projected fine revenues,
should result in a substantial net savings of wasted direct and indirect costs. Upon adoption of
the proposed ordinance, the first false alarm at each premises will result in a written warning.
Thereafter, fines will be imposed for more than one false alarm from the same premises within
any 180 day period. Four ($4) dollars of each fine will be remitted to the Clerk of Courts as an
administration fee; the remainder of each fine will be deposited into the fines and forfeitures
fund.
None.
~ Subject to input at the public hearing hereon, it is recommended that
the Board of County Commissioners adopt this proposed False Alarm Ordinance to reduce the
number of "False alarms" that are occurring within unincorporated Collier County.
Prepared by: ~un~el ~
Approved by: ~~
o On Hunter, Sheriff
llier County
Date
!
2
4
$
?
~0
11
12
14
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
2~
30
32
~4
37
4O
41
ORDINANCE NO. 97-___
TIlE COLLIER COUNTY FALSE ALARM
ORDINANCE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS;
PROVIDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY
ALARM SYSTEMS AND FALSE ALARMS;
REQUIRED RESPONSE; PROVIDING FOR
WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE AI,ARM
VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM
REPORT FORMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION;
PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM FINES;
EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT
AND PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR INCLUSION IN TIlE CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WItEREAS, security alarm systems in unincorporated Collier County
convey alarm signals to the Collier County Sheriff's Office to indicate an apparent
forced entry into or from the secured premises; and
WHEREAS, approximately nineW-eight percent (98%) of security alarm
signals received by the Sheriffs Office are false alarms; and
WHEREAS, persons who should be responsible to prevent false alarms
from being emitted from their securit3,' alarm system often fail to assume their
responsibilities to prevent false alarms, whereby thousands of unnecessary official
[aw enforcement responses to such false alarms waste valuable time of law
enforcement officers of the Collier Cot, nty Sheriff's Office; and
WHEREAS, persons who do not voluntarily assume their responsibilities
to prevent false alarms, will, through enforcement of this Ordinance, be subject to
fees, fines and other possible penalties; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that it is in the best
interests of the citizens and residents of Collier County to adopt this Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TIlE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the
following Ordinance is hereby adopted.
SECTION ONE: This Ordinance is titled and should be cited as the "Collier
County False Alarm Ordinance." AGEt,IQA
9
~0
11
13
17
19
20
23
2~
26
30
31
32
33
SECTION TWO: DEFINITIONS. As used herein, the following lerms
shall have the specified meanings unless another meaning is clearly required by
the context:
' Enforcement official means the Sheriff of Collier County, each Deputy
Sheriff, and/or any authorized representative or designee of the Sheriff.
False alarm means activation of a security alarm signal caused by
something other than an actual or attempted forced or unauthorized entry into or
forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which signal results in
a law enforcement response. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a
security alarm signal is a false alarm whenever an enforcement officer responds to
an alarm signal and the responding officer determines that the alarm signal was
triggered by (a) a cause other than an attempted or actual forced or unauthorized
entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, or (b) by
intentional activation of that alarm signal based upon a good faith, reasonable
mistake that a crime was being committed at the secured premises.
Official resr~onse means whe:~ any enforcement officer responds by
traveling to a secured premises in response to a security alarm signal from that
premises.
Owner means owner of the secured premises, including each co-owner of
co-owned property, including, and not limited to, each tenant by the entireties,
each joint tenant, and each tenant in common.
Premises means any residence, any building or structure, and any
apartment, office, condominium, or any other unit thereof.
Responsible party means (a) each owner, (b) each 18 years or older
occupant of the secured premises, and (c) each tenant and each subtenant, and (d)
other persons or entities, if any, that have by written agreement with the owner
agreed to be responsible for false alarms emitted from that secured premises.
Secured Premises means the premises intended to be protected by the
security alarm system.
Security alarm malfunction means emission of any alarm signal caused by
mechanical failure, improper system design, equipment malfunction, improper
maintenance or lack of maintenance, power failure or power
JA, 2 u ,.--'.:
2
1
2
$
I0
12
14
19
2O
24
2~
26
27
~0
31
33
34
substantially similar cause. Malfunctions do not include any accidental activation
of thc alarm signal by an action that thc syslcm was designed to bc triggered by.
Security alarm system means any alarm dc'.;icc that is used to emit a signal
to alert persons of an attempted or actual forced entry into or forced or
Gnauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which system emits a signal
(electrical impulse and/or tone) to prompt an official response from any Collier
County enforcement officer. Excluded arc (I) alarm devices that emit alarm
signals because of unauthorized acts to a vehicle, and (2) systems installed by a
telephone company to protect only thc company's telephone equipment.
Signal means a power impulse or audible tone emitted from a security
alarm system which indicates that a true or false alarm has occurred.
Vacant means premises that arc not physically occupied by any responsible
adult at any time during an official response by an enforcement officer.
SECTION THREE: RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY ALARM
SVSTEMS AND FALSE ALARMS; REQUIRED RESPONSE.
(a) Responsibili .ty for Sccuri .ty Alarm Systems. Neither thc County, nor
the Sheriffs Office, nor any member of either shall have or assume any
responsibility for the installation, repair, maintenance, operation, or effectiveness
of any security alarm system not then owned by Collier County. Responsibilities
for false alarms emitted by the respective security alarm system rest solely, jointly
and severally, with each responsible party. Each active security alarm system in
unincorporated Collier County must always have at least one (1) responsible party.
No person or entity shall maintain any security alarm system that automatically
dials thc statcwidc emergency telephone number (currently "911"), or any other
telephone number assigned to thc Shcrift's Office except as then required by
federal law, state law, or county ordinance.
(b) gesponsibility For False Alarms. Each owner of thc secured
premises is primarily responsible under this Ordinance for false alarms at thc
secured premises. Owners may by lease or other written agreement assign that
primary responsibility to persons or entities that occupy thc secured premises, or
to managers of thc secured premises; however, failure of any such non-o,,mcr to
fully comply with any warning or citation under this Ordinance shall
owner responsible for such false alarms and thc resulting penaltics~ Eal:ha.l.0(?.~C~
5
9
10
12
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
36
responsible party is jointly ~,nd severally responsible under this Ordinance for all
false alarms at the respective secured premises.
(c) ~ When responding to an =farm at a
vacant secured premises, the responding officer should attempt to contact a
~'esponsible party. If within ten (10) minutes of arrival at the secured premises the
alarm signal is not terminated, that alarm may be terminated by the County.
SECTION 'FOUR:
WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE ALAIBI
VIOLATIONS.
(a) First False Alarm. A written warning shall be issued for the first false
alarm at that secured premises which occurs after the effective date of this
Ordinance. The warning may be left at the secured premises or otherwise
delivered to a responsible party. The warning may be left at a conspicuous place
within a vacant secured premises, or may be left with any adult occupant,
employee, or agent of an occupant of an occupied secured premise. Alternatively,
the warning may be mailed to any responsible par~ by regular United States mail,
but if returned undelivered, then mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested,
or by actual service by any other lawful service of process.
(b). Second and Subsequent False Alarms. An enforcement official may
issue a citation of a false alarm violation of this Ordinance for the second or any
other subsequent false alarm that occurs at that secured premises within ! 80 days
of the last false alarm at that premises. The citation may be served upon any
responsible party by any lawful service of process.
SECTION FIVE:
FALSE ALAI~I REPORT FORM - CORRECTIVE
ACTION.
(a) Securi .ty Alarm Report Form. In each instance where a security alarm
is determined by warning or citation of violation from an enforcement official to
be a false alarm, a responsible party must promptly file with the Collier County
Sheriff's Office a completed "Security Alarm Report Form." That form must be
completed with true and correct information and be returned to the SherifF's
Office within twenty (20) days of the date of that false alarm.
(b) Each report form, when completed, must include
information:
the
¢
S
9
~0
~2
~4
].9
20
2!
22
23
21
28
29
30
3[
32
33
(I) Thc full name(s), address, home and/or work telephone number
of at least one (l) responsible individu, al regarding the sccuri~ alarm system at
that sccurcd premises.
(2) The name, address and telephone number of at least one (1)
authorized individual representative of a responsible party who can bc
immcdiatcly notificd in the event of a subsequent false alarm at that prcmiscs.
(3) If applicable, the name and 24-hour telephone number of the
business or entity that will be monitoring that alarm system.
(4) The exact cause of the alarm, if known. If the cause of the
alarm is not known, specify in dc{ail the suspected cause of the alarm. If
applicable, include all information that indicates the alarm was not a false alarm.
(5) Describe all corrcctivc action that was taken to eliminate that
cause of that false alarm from rccurring.
(6) Other information that may assist the SheritTs Office in the
event ora subsequent fa]se alarm from that alarm system.
(c) Corrective Action. Unless it is obvious that the alarm was lriggered
by a cause other than a system malfunction, the system should be examined by an
alarm technician or another pcrson who is knowlcdgcablc regarding causes of
security alarm system malfunctions for that type of system, whereby a good faith
attempt is made to prevent that type of false alarm from reoccurring.
(d) Failure to Promptly Deliver False Alarm Report Form - Fine. Each
failure to have the completed False Alarm Report Form delivered to the Sheriff's
Office by the date due shall subject the responsible party to a civil fine of $25.00.
These late reporting fines are in addition to fines for false alarms.
(c) S~epar:ate Report for Each False Alarm. Each false alarm more than
twenty-four (24) hours apart from a prior false alarm where there was an official
enforcement officer's response shall require the filing of a separate "Security
Alarm Report Form."
SECTION SIX: FALSE ALARM FINES; EXCEPTIONS.
(a) False Alarm Fines. A written warning (for the first false alarm) does
not require payment of a fine. Airier a citation for a second or subsequent false
alarm violation is issued, a r~sponsible party shall, within thirty (30) days of the
2
3
4
6
10
~.1
12
13
14
2O
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
36
date of that alarm, pay to the Clerk of the Courts a false alarm civil
follows:
FALSE ALARM FINE SCHEDULE
Number of False Alarms Within a I$0 Day Period
False Alarm Fine Per False Alarm:
First Response .................... Must File Report; no false alarm fine.
Second Response ............... File Report plus $75.00 fine.
Third Response .................. File Report plus $75.00 fine.
Fourth Response ............... File Report plus $75.00 fine.
Five or more Responses: .... File Report; mandatory court
appearance and fine of not less than S l00.O0 nor more than
$300.00.
fine as
(b) Exceptions:
(I) 180 Days Without a False Alarm. lfone hundred eighty (180)
days pass without a false alarm from the respective alarm system, a "clean
slate" status shall be automatically granted to that system if each Report has
been filed and ali false alarm fines arising out of every prior false alarm Cot
that system have been paid. The first false alarm after "clean slate' s:atus
shall require only a v.'ritten warning and shall commence a new I $0 day
time period for subsequent false alarms from that alarm system.
(2) New Alarm System Installed. Installation of an entirely new
security alarm system at the secured premises, upon written notice of same
to the Sheriff's Office and all prior false' alarm fines are paid, shall be
classified as a new system and shall be treated as an alarm system that had
no prior false alarm(s) - 'clean slate" status.
(3) Good Faith Mistake of Crime Being Committed. No person
shall violate this Ordinance by intentionally setting off a security alarm
signal to prompt an official response if that was alarm set off based upon a
reasonable mistake of fact that a crime was then being committed at the
secured premises. Thc responding enforcement official will determine
whether there was a reasonable mistake of fact to justify that intentional
If excused, that alarm shall not be counted
activation of that alarm signal.
as a false alarm.
1
2
4
6
7
10
:9
21
22
24
2~
26
27
29
30
SECTION SEVEN: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY PROVISIONS.
(a) ' ' . ..C.o. umy .Co,1
~ In addition to all enforcement provisions spc..ified i~ this Ordinance,
and as provided for in Section 125.69, Florida Stat,res, a~¥ neT~on who shall
~,iolate any provision of this Ordinance shall, at thc elccti',o o~' the Coanty, be
subject to the enforcement provisions of Section I-6 of the Collier County Code of
Laws and Ordinances, excluding possible imprisonment, exceot for contempt of
court. Violations of this Ordinance may be referred by tl',e Sheriff to the Code
Enforcement Board for enforcement pursuant to Chapte[ 162, Florida Stamles,
including filing liens against the secured premises.
(b) ' --' · s_alld. Y_ipes. All fees
and/or fines charged under this Ordinance shall be an obligation o, vcd jointly and
severally by each responsible par~y. Fees and fines shall be 7.~id m fhe Clerk of
Court within the time periods specified in this Ordinance except as may be ordered
otherwise by a trial judge. Prompt payment of each false alarm fir~.,, ~l~all clear and
settle that false alarm violation, but shall not affect the duty to file the respective
False Alarm Report Form.
(c) ~ Fines and custs imposed against
a responsible party are to be distributed as follows: Four d311ars (~,4.00) to the
Clerk of the Courts as an administration fee, and the balance of' th:. funds of each
fine is to be deposited in the fine and forfeitures fund of the Sheriffs Office to off-
set the Sheriff's operating budget costs.
SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In thc event that this Ordinance conflicts with any ether ordinance of Collier
County or other applicable law, thc more restrictive shall eTvly l~f any phrase or
portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutiona~ by ar~y court of
competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed separate, distinct and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect thc validity of the
remaining portion.
JA;.I 2 ¢ ';:!:.7
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2*7
20
29
3O
32
33
34
36
SECTION NINE:
INCLUSION IN TIlE CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES.
Thc provisions of this Ordinance shall become and bc made a part of thc
Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. Thc sections of this
Ordinance may be rcnumbercd or rclcttcrcd to accomplish such, and thc word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with thc Florida
Department of State, but shall not be enforced until 6:00 A.M. on the
of ,1997.
day
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of ~, 1997.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK,
CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:,
Deputy Clerk
By:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Attorney
h ',m'd m a K eJ',J'a I sea l Jl.m.t
T C P /Twt)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners
approve Petition SNR.-96o 10.
PKEPARED BY:
Customer Service Agent Supervisor
REVIEWED B3~.. '
Building Review and Permitting
.APP.R~D BY: ~
Vincefit, X. Cautero, Administrator
Community Development and Environmental Services
Date
Date
Date
AGENDA ITEM
gAN 2 8 1997
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
RESO:UTIO~ RENAHING RIFLE RANGE ROAD TO "THE LORD'S WAY#, WHICH STR£ET
IS LOCATEL EAST OF C.R. 951, IH SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHER£AS, the Board of County Commissioners is authorized pursuant
to authority of Chapter 336.05, Florida Statutes, to name or rename
streets and reads, except for certain state roads; and
WHE~A::, c~e Board of County Commissioners has been requested to
confirm the renaming of Rifle Range Road to The Lord's ~ay. This
street ~s located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Colli~ Count~, Florida, as described as
EXHIBIT
WHEREAS. there appears to be no street in Collier County with this
name or a~ ~imilar sounding name; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for ~dentification purposes to confirm
the na~e of this street,
NOW TH£REFORE, BE IT RESOLV£O BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO~I$SIONERS
OF COLICS,. ?~TY,
Th~ aame of ~is s~ree= is hereby changed from Rifle Range Road
to The Lord's Way and ~s conf~ed as same.
BE ~T F~THER RESOLVED tha~ ~his Resolution ~ recorded in the
~bl~c Ra=ords of Collier Court=y, Florida, and no~ed upon
the s~ree= and zoning a~lases of Collier County, and notations ~ade on
the re~ereDced Pla~.
Co~tssioner offered ~he forgoing r~solu~lon and
moved ~ adoption, seconded by Commissioner and
upon roll call ~he vo~e was=
PAGE
AGE T£
JAN g 8 1997
P~., ~
!
2
3
4
$
6
?
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Done th~e ~day of ~, 1996,
AYES=
NAYS=
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COU~JTY, FLORIDA
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BY:
JOHN C. NORRIS, CHAXP.~AN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
HARJORIE H. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
SNR-96-10 RESOLUTION/18593
PAGE 2
JAN 8 1997
~JAN ~ 8 1997
'"7
I -
UAN ,~ 8 1667
EXECUTIVE SUMMARy
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF
"NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS REPLAT"v AND APPROVE THE VACATION OF THE
RECORDED PLAT OF "NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS"v PETITION AV-96-03~
To approve for recording the final plat of "Northshore Lake
Villas Replat" and approve the vacation of the recorded plat of
"Northshore Lake Villas", Petition AV-96-036.
CONSIDERATIONS~
The Board of County Commissioners approved for recording the
final plat of "Northshore Lake Villas" on August 13, 1996. Due to
a revision of the Right-of-Way alignment, the replat was
necessitated.
FISCAL IMP~CTt
The fiscal impact to the County is none. The
project cost is $415,314.19 to be borne by the
developer.
The security amount, equal to 100% of the cost to
complete the remaining improvements and 10% of the
total cost of the project, is $457,600.00. The
existing Construction and Maintenance Agreement and
letter of Credit for "Northshore Lake Villas" will
serve as the security for "Northshore Lake Villas
Replat". The County will realize revenues as
follows:
Fund: 113
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $8,072.72
Fees are based on a construction estimate of
$415,314.19 and were paid in May 1996, and are
reflected in the Executive Summary of August 13,
1996.
AGENDA IT, EM ,
JAN 8 1997
Executive Summary
Northshore Lake Villas Replat
Page 2
~ROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP~CT~ None
RECOHMEND~TION~
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the final plat of
"Northshore Lake Villas Replat", and approve Petition AV-96-036
with the following stipulations=
Accept the posted letter of credit as security to
guarantee completion of the Subdivision improvements.
2)
Authorize the recording of the final plat of "Northshore
Lake Villas Replat".
3) Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution.
4)
That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the
required improvements have received preliminary
acceptance.
PREPARED BY:
John R. HouldSwOrth, Senior Engineer
Engineering Review
Date
REVIEWED BY:
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E.
Engineering Review Manager
,
Donald W. Arnold~ -
Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator
Community Development & Environmental Services
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
JR~:ew
Date
Date
Date
AGENDA, ITeM
JAN
'21, 2'0'
~A~sc £s cAs~,"' coZr, rCR cou~
' PROSECT
., . ~ATION
AG~N
No
JAN ~ 1997
PErITI'ON TO VACATE. ABANDON'. DYSCONTINUE. OR CLOSE
__ Public Street __ Dcdlcatcd £ascmcut
.--. Alleyway --- Utility
~ Subdi~iou Plat __ Dra]aagc
Date Received:
Pet;dooer. Gulfshore Lake Villas, Inc.
Gene Thrusl'man, President
Add~ess: 2063 Trade Center Way
City/Sure: Naples, Florida 34109
Tclepbo.c:. (941) 514-0514
Agent: Blair A. Fol~
Addtuss: 3106 South Horseshoe Drive
Telephone: 643-2~1:~4
City/State: Naples, Florida · 34104
Ad.ess of Subject Pro~w. 626 Capt'n Kate Court
City/State: Naples, Florida
Location: Sect;on 21 Township 48S Range 25E
Legal Desc~ption:
See attached Exhibit "A"
Plat Book: 27 Page (0:33-34
Re.on for Request: Revise location of 1~'-.=. maintenance easement to coincide
existing lake location. CEC will file replat of subdivision to show sudq
Current Zoning: PUD Do~s ~ affect de:sky? 'No
I Hereby Authorize Agent Above: to Represent, b~ for t~ Pet;t/on:
Bat:
(=)
(3)
(4)
(9
Please sec 'Pollcy and Procedures of Vacation and Azmulmcnt: for the ~t of $uppor6ve matcHal~ wl~ch mttst
accompany ~ petit;on, and dcllver or ma~l to:
Transportation 5er~-~ DMsion
CoU]er Cottaty Government Complex
Naples, FL 34112
Telephone: (941) 774-8'160
If applicant is a land trust, so ~dicate and name beneficiaries.
If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers sad major
stockholders.
If applicant is a partnership, limited partnerxblp or other bu,;~t.ss entity, so indicate and name
pr~dpais.
If appticant is an ovmcr, indicate cxacdy u recorded, and l~t afl o~cr o~mcrs,
If applicant is a lessee, attach a copy of lease, a~d indicate actu~ owners ~ not
· .............. : ........... : MetroScan/Coll
Owner : ILARIA JEAN
CoOuner :
Site :532 ROMA. CT NAPLES 33963
Mail =532 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
:06/25/91 Doc ,:1626-1316
:$218,000 Deed :
Lo~Amt: Doan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE F~MILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT i OR 1627 PG
:256
:
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILL~S
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
,. . ........ : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :WEST J~MES J & RUBY L
CoOWner :
Site :538 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :538 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :10/23/91 Doc #:1657-0953
Price : $194,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestTy~e: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 2 OR 1657 PG
:953
:
iPlat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:485
Folio $:79795000061
Strap $:153250
Land :$6],473
Struct :$133,700
Agric :
Total :$197,173
%Imprvd:68
% Owned:
Exempt :HOHESTE~D
Amount :$25,000
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,910.17
-- Phone --
OWller =941-591-8227
Tenant :
13A21
[J:;2,543
:
Folio $:79795000087
Strap $:153250
Land :$57,000
Strict :$107,709
Agric :
Total :$164,709
%Imprvd:65
% Owned:
Exempt :HOMESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,062.02
-- Phone --
Owner :941-591-8973
Tenant :
23A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No'
........ - ..... : Met
wrier =CUDDIE STEVEN & NANCY
:oO~neT :
:ire :S44 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
:ail :18 HILL COUNTRY DR STOUFFVILLE
:feted : 11/13/90 Doc [: 1571-2087
~rlce :$242,000 Deed :
~oan Amt: Loan : ..
~estType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT '3 OR 1571 PG
:2087
:
~ub/Plat: VANDERBILT VILLAS
:ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
.~:25E T:48S S:21
er :
Folio f:79795000100
Strap [:153250
..... '~:Land :$57,000
CANADA Struct :$117,009
Agric :
Total :$174,009
%Imprvd:67
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,568.26
-- Phone --
Owner
Tenant :
33A21
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~
........ : MetroScan/Collier :
:SUTKOWSKI STEVE & MARY C Folio ~:79795000126
Strap f:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :
Agric :
Total :$57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:100
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$841.29
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
43A21
CoOwner :
5ire :556 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :556 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :05/23/94 Doc %:1949-2068
Price :$76,000 Deed :WARRANTY
Loan A mt: Loan :
VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 4 OR 1949 PG
:2068
:
5ub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
..........
Lot Acres:.24 ' 10,454
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
.----~. ..... ; ;- - ~. "--... ~-."..-'--j' , . . ,---:,..'.~.~"".' .
NO. SUeO2Y~S~ON
S. TA~B]n.T ~
d.
S.
P.E. PG.
tS S-4
P.l. PG.
Owner :SUTKOWSKI SR STEPHEN J
CoOwner :~'~Y ¢ SUTKOWSKI
Site ~':566 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Ma£1 :14 GRANDVIEW DR HUGHESTOWN PA 18640
Xferea :05/22/92 Doc ~:1718-0245
Price :$253,000 Deed :
Loan A mt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 5 OR 1718 PG
:245
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
, ........ : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA
CoOWner :
Site :562 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :06/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984 '
Price : Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:O000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 6 OR 1539 PG
:984
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
..........
Lot Acres:.24 10,454
Folio l:79795000142
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :$115,296
Agric :
Total :$172,296
%Imprvd:67
% Owned:
Exempt :
Anount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,542.97
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
53A21
Folio ~:79795000168
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :
Agric :
Total :$57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$841.29
-- Phone --
Owner :941-597-5886
Tenant :
63A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
*.oOvneT :
:ire :568 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
:ail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963
:feted : 06/25/90 Doc #: 1539-0983
)r~ : Deed :
m~tmt: Loan :
~e ~Type: IntTy:
~ender
~and Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
~egal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 7 OR 1539 PG
:983
:
;ub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
=ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
~:25E T:4t~s S:21
: MetroScan/Collier
3wrier :FRONGILLO ROBERT A/ROSE
:oOwner :
~ite :574 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
.Hail :1~ LOCUST AVE WORCESTER KA 01604
Xfered :04/03/96 Doc 1:2166-0109
Price : ~ .]0,000 Deed :WARRANTY
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use: 0¢ 00 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :V?~DERBILT VILLAS LOT 8 OR 1539 PG
'1at: VANDERBILT VILLAS
:'~ract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:~SS S:21
Folio t :79795000184
Strap t :153250
Land :$57,000
struct :
Agric :
Total : $57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Hillage: 14.7594
1995 Tx:$841.29
-- Phone --
Owner :941-597-4168
Tenant :
73A21
Folio t:79795000207
Strap t:153250 83A21
Land :$57,000
Struct :
Agric :
Total :$57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:100
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$841.29
-- Phone --
O~er
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Gu
aranK~R~a ITEM
Owner :FELDMAN SIDNEY & DOLORES G
CoOwner :
site :580 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
~ail :580 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :04/04/90 Doc J:1517-1606
Price :$68,900 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 9 OR 1517 PG
:1606
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Folio ~:79795000223
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :$111,021
Agric :
Total :$168,021
%Imprvd:66
% Owned:
Exempt :HOMESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Hillage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,110.92
-- Phone --
Owner :941-591-4207
Tenant :
* : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :GLEESON TERENCE M/MARGARET C LANGAN
CoOwner :
Site :586 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :586 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :02/28/96 Doc #:2152-2284
Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY
Loan A mt: Loan :
VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 10 OR 1479 PG
:298
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Folio #:79795000249
Strap #:153250
Land :$64,125
Struct :$120,991
Agric :
Total :$185,116
%Imprvd:65
% Owned:100
Exempt :
~mount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$2,363.23
-- Phone --
Owner :941-591-3932
Tenant :
93A21
103A21
The Information Provided is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
JAN 2 8 1997
........ = Me~roscan/collier
Owner :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA ET AL
CoOwner : NICOLO
Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS*
Hail :496 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered : Doc it:
: Deed :
Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS PARCEL A
:
:
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census : Tract Block
R:25E T:48S S:21
, ....... : ~letroScan/Collier
Owner :HUNT HARLEY L & MARLENE H
CoOwner :
Site :589 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :589 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :10/24/94 Doc t:1996-1013
Price :$275,000 Deed :WARRANTY
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: F~tRRIED PERSONS IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 11 O.R 1996 PG
:1013
:
,Plat: VANDERBI LT VILLAS
~sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
o
: Lot Acres:.29 12,632
Folio J :79795000029
Strap J:153250
Land :$209
Struct :
Agric :
Total : $209
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage: 14 · 7594
1995 Tx:S3.07
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
Folio t:79795000265
Strap t:153250
Land :$66,150
Struct :$127,115
Agric :
Total :$193,265
%Imprvd:66
% Owned:100
Exempt :HOMESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$2,483.49
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
A3A21
113A21
f
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
· JAN 2 8 1997
, .................. : ]4etroScan/¢o£11er
Owner :STUART III JOHN & CAROL W
CoOwner :
Site :583 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :583 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :01/30/90 Doc ~: 1501-1540
Price :$72,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 12 OR 1501 PG
:1540
:
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
,. : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA
CoOwner :
Site :577 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :06/25/90 Doc ~: 1539-0984
Price : Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use: 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 13 OR 1539 PG
:984
:
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
26 11,325
Folio ~:79795000281
Strap ~:153250 123A21
Land :$58,800
Struct :$154,397
Agric :
Total :$213,197
%Imprvd:72
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$3,146.66
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
Folio #:79795000304
Strap 9:153250
Land :$58,800
Struct :
Agric :
Total :$58,800
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$867.85
-- Phone --
O-~ner :941-597-5886
Tenant :
133A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not G
. fler. ro:~carl/t.:o J. J.
~f .... .- .....................
Ovner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA
CoOvner :
Site :571 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963
}(ail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered = 06/26/90 Doc ~ = 1539-0984
ce : Deed :
VestType: IntT~:
Land Use:0000 %,ACANT~td~S~D£NTXAL
:984
:
R:2~E T:489 S:21
~__. - .... : ~etroScan/¢ollier
CoOwner :
Site :565 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :565 ROm CT NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :01/10/91 Doc ~: 1585-0089
Price : $?0,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender
Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VI~LAS LOT 15 OR 1585 PG
:89
)1at: VANDERBILT V'CLLAS
sus =Tract 101.0c Block 3
R:25E T:485 .f:21
Folio t :79795000320
Strap I: 153250 143A21
"~ ' Lanc~ :$57,000
struct :
~ric :
Total : $57, ~0~
~ ~e~:
Zxe~t :
~o~nt :
1995 Tx:~841.29
-- Phone --
O'~er = 941-597-5886
Tenant =
Folio ~:79795000346
Strap t:153250 153A21
Land :$57,000
Struct :$123,984
Agric :
Total =$180,984
%Imp~d:69
% Owned:
Exempt :HOHESTE~D
Anount :$25,000
H!ilage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,302.22
-- Phone --
G~er :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Gt
JAN 8 199'
Owner =LA GRASTA ]~AURO & ANNA
CoOwner :
Site :559 ROKA CT NAPLE~ 33963
Hail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :06/25/90 Doc #:1539-0983
Price
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestTyp ·: IntTy .'
Lender :
Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal =VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 16 OR 1539 PG
=983
Sub/Plat: VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census · :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
, ........ : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :RENDINO STEPHEN & TINA
CoOwner *-
· Site :553 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963
~ail :203 N HIGHLAND DR PITTSTON PA 1864O
Xfered *.05/17/91 Doc #:1616-15~8
. Price *.$235,000 Deed
Loan Ant: Loan ;
VestType: IntTy:
Lender
· Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 17 OR 1616 PG
*.1588
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
: Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Folio #:79795000362
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct *.
A~ric
Total :$57,000
%Impr~rd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
H~llage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$841.29
-- Phone --
O~ner :941-597-4168
Tenant :
163A21
Folio #:79795000388
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :$115,857
Agric
Total :$172,857
%Imprvd*.67
% Owned*.
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx=$2,551.27
-- Phone --
O-aner :717-655-6396
Tenant :
173A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
. ........ . ....... : ~etroScan/Collier
Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA
CoOwner : ''
Site :547 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963
=06/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984
Xp~d = Deed:
L~ Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 18 OR 1539 PG
:984
:
Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT ~;ILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S=21
..........
Lot Acres: .24 10,454
. ....... : MetroScan/Collter
Owner :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA
CoOwner :
Site :541 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
Mail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered : 06/25/90 Doc ~: 1539-0983
Price : Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
L~gal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 19 OR 1539 PG
:983
:
/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
:mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~mm~
Folio #:79795000401
· . Strap ~:153250 183A21
Land =$57,000
Struct :
Agri¢ :
Total
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt =
Amount :
Mlllage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$841.29
-- Phone --
Ovner :941-597-5886
Tenant :
,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~
Folto ~:79795000427
Strap ~:153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :
Agric
Total :$57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
)mount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$841.29
-- Phone --
~ner :941-597-4168
Tenant :
193A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
· JAN 8 1997
..
:LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA
:b~5 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
:860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963
:c~6/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984
: Deed :
: Loan :
: IntTy:
: 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
:V.~NDERBILT VILLAS LOT 20 OR 1539 PG
;984
:
:VANDERBILT VILLAS
:Tract 101.00 Block 3
485 S:21
Folio ~:79795000443
Strap ~/: 153250
Land :$57,000
Struct :
Agri¢ :
Total : $57,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage: 14.7594
1995 Tx: $841.29
-- Phone --
Owner :941-597-5886
Tenant :
',." :', "cs: .24 10,454
* ..... : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :GARCIA MARIA C RODRIGUEZ
CcC'.:~/ek- :
S.i-..-. :529 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
M;..'.i :529 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
X f :. re¢~. :09/01/95 Doc #:2095-1304
~" . -~: :~237,000 Deed :TRUSTEES
_.c~_.. A,,%: Loan :
'.L. :-~':'¥:..e:~.UtRRIED PERSONS IntTy:
*'-~.-;:~ U,',~: 0001 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
~'.' ::~.~ :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 21
? ,.,: ~: I ,,t: VANDERBILT VILLAS
ce~._-'u~. :Tract 101.00 Block 3
. R ~ L '5'.,-' :4;~S S:21
203A21
Folio #:79795000469
Strap #:153250
Land :$64,395
Struct :$133,883
Agrtc :
Total :$198,278
%Imprvd:68
% Owned:100
Exempt :
Amount :
Hillage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$2,557.49
-- Phone --
O-~ner :
Tenant :
213A21
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
- _. ........- ..:.. ....... ....................... :_ ..................
.. j JAN P, 8 1997
......... I ........
, : MetroScan/Collier
O~,n~r :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA ET AL
c.:~..:nez : ~ICOLO
$i~ ~519 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963
}Jail :496 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963
L, ~, · Deed :
Ve ~tT.ype ~ IntTy:
Le::d~r
La~.~ Us~:: 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL
Le~a]. :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 22 LESS PH 1
:VANDERBILT VILLAS CONDO AS DESC IN
~OR 1437 PG12S, LESSPOOL DESC IN ...
· Su~. Plut:VANDERBILT VILLAS
Ce~:_~us ~Traot 101.00 Block 3
L. ~
: ..... : MetroScan/Collier
O...:::zl' :VANDERBILT VILLAS CONDO ASSOC
CcOwD~ 1' :
Site :509 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 '
'M::L! :532 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963
· ~farec~- :04/01/92 Doc ~:1701-0079
~rlc¢ :$1,000 Deed :
· Lcal~ A~,t: Loan :
Ve3tT~.pe: IntTy:
L<-::dE.:
La::d ~,.:e: 0035 REC,TOURIST ATTRACTION,EXHIBIT
: ~.:.,.a5 :WANDERBILT VILLAS THAT PORTIONOF
:LOT 22 DESC IN OR 1701 PG 81 A/K/A
:POOL & BLDG
u'.:/! !~:~ ~ VANDERBILT VILLAS
!.:s~,.-' :Tract 101.00 Block 3
· R:i'9;* ?:48S S:21
Folio 1:797950004~
Strap #:1532S0 223A2~
Land :$247,000
Struct :
Agric :
Total :$247,000
%Imprvd:
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$3,645.57
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
Folio ~:79795000~4
Strap I:153250 22.23A21
Land :$200
struct :$5o
Agri¢ :
Total :$250
%Imprvd:20
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$3.68
-- Phone --
o-~'ner :
Tenant :941-592-7823
The information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
JAN 8 1997
Owner :RINALDI CARL J & JEAN C
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~101 NAPLES 33963
Hail :509 ROMA CT #101 NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :06/29/90 Doc ~: 1541-0169
Price :$102,500 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
~and Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)~,101OR
1 :1541 PG 169
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
.ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
:25E T:4..8S S:21
Folio #:79807500022
Strap ~:153254 1013A21
Land · :
Struct :$76,500
Agric
Total :$76,500
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:
Exempt :HOHESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Hillage:14.7594
1995 TX:$760.12
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
LOt Acres:
"* ............ : MetroScan/Collier
..Dwner :R~SMAN STANLEY & EDYTHE J
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~102 NAPLES 33963
~ail :509 ROMA CT ~102 NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :11/19/91 Doc ~:1664-0768
Price :$82,000 Deed :
.Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #102OR
:1664 PG 768
:
_~ub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Lot ..........
Folio #:79807500048
1023A21
Strap #:153254
Land :
Struct :$74,200
Agric :
Total :$74,200
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
Hillage:14.?594
1995 TX:$1,095.15
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is N
O~ner :STANTON ROBERT A & ~u~RGARET L
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROH~ CT #103 NAPLES 33963
~ail :509 ROMA CT ~103 NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :03/02/90 Doc ~:1509-1375
~e ~$100,000 Deed :
Amt Loan :
V~tType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIU~
Legal :VANDERBILT VILL~S (CONDO) ]1030R
:1509 PG 1375
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Lot Acres:
· . : MetroScan/Collier :
O~ner :GRAVINA THOMAS J & NANCY B
CoOwner :JOSEPH C
Site :509 RO}~A CT #104 NAPLES 33963
Mail :26 RIDGE RD ROSELAND NJ 07068
Xfered :10/31/95 Doc ~:2114-0610
Price :$85,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY
Loan Amt:$68,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL
VestType:~RRIED PERSONS IntTy~FIXED
Lender :AFI MTG
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~104
:
:
.at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
:Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft:
Folio ~:79807500064
Strap ~=153254 1033A21
Land
St~uct :$74,200
Agr~c
Total :$74,200
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:
Exempt :HOMESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Hillage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$726.15
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant
Folio J:79807500080
Strap #:153254 1043A21
Land :
st=uct :$74,200
Agric :
Total :$74,200
%Imprvd:lO0
% Owned:lO0
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$1,095.15
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
JAN 1997
Owner =LIDRBAUCH NORMAN J
CoOwner =KAREN S KNEZEVICH
Site. :509 ROMA CT #105 NAPLES 33963
Hail :8418 GLENEAGLES CT DUBLIN OH 43017
Xfered :04/30/90 Doc J:1524-1§85
Price :$99,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
:1524 PG 1585
:
Suh/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
* ..... : HetroScan/Collier
Owner :CARROLL BARBARA J
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~106 NAPLES 33963
Hail :6334 NEW LONDON DR COLUMBUS OH 43231
Xfered :04/30/90 Doc ~:1524-1594
Price :$99,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~106
:
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Lot Acres: Lot Sq
Folio #:79807500103
Strap J:153254 1~53A21
Land :
Struct :$74,200
Agri¢ :
Total :$74,200
%Imprvd:lO0
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
H£11age:24.7594
1995 Tx:$1,095.15
-- Phone --
Owner
Tenant :
Folio ~:79807500129
Strap #:153254 1063A21
Land
Struct :$74,200
Agric :
Total :$74,200
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount
Millage:14.7594
1995 TX:$1,095.15
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
i
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. i~
Owner :KAARBO TODD & CARMELLA
CoOwner :DAVID;CAROL JOUPPI
Sito :509 ROMA CT %107 NAPLES 33963
Hail :7901 CMESSHIRE CT HAPLE GROVE HN 55311
Xfered :10/23/95 Doc t:2111-1412
:e : Deed :AGREEMENT
Amt: Loan :
{pe:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) 1107
:
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
,_ : HetroScan/Collier
~.;ner :PAYTON ROBERT C/MARY A
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~108 NAPLES 33963
Mail :PO BOX 10819 BONITA SPRINGS FL 33929
Xfered :06/25/96 Doc 1:2198-1697
Price :$82,500 Deed :WARRANTY
Loun Amt:$66,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL
VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:FIXED
l~nder :WATERFORD MTG
Land Use:O004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #1080R
:1834 PG 945
.at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
:Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
..........
Lot Acres:
£olio t:79807500145
Strap t:153254 ]073A21
Land
Struct :$7402~0
Agric :
Total :$74,20~
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:lOC
Exempt :
~ount :
Millage:14~;594
1995 Tx:$1,095.15
-- Phone --
Owner :612-494-3013
Tenant :
Folio t:79807500161
Strap ~:153254 1083A21
Land
struct :$76,500
Agric :
Total :$76,500
%Imprvd:lO0
% Owned:lO0
Exempt :
Amount
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$1,129.08
-- Phone --
owner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No
J&N 8 1997
Owner :SERAFIN STANLEY & LUCILLE
CoOwne= :
Site :509 ROMA CT #201 NAPLES 33963
Hail :5530 S CHRISTIANA AVE CHICAGO IL 60629
Xfered :05/18/89 Doc #:1441-2157
Price :$116,400 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy =
Lender ~
Land U.~e: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM
Fo1
Strap ~:1S3254
Land :
Struct :$80,325
Agric
Total :$80,325
%Imprvd: 100
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
:79807500488
20~3A21
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~201OR
:1441 PG 2157
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T;48S S:21
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$1,185.56
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
* ....... : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :CAMILLERI LILLIAN
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT #202 NAPLES 33963
~ail :12 NEWPORT ST BRAMALEA CANADA
Xfered :08/08/94 Doc ~:1974-0575
Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY
Loan A~c: Loan :
Vestl~'Pe: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #2020R
:1974 PG 575
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25F C:48S S:21
Folio ~:79807500501
2023A21"
Strap ~:153254
Land :
Struct :$78,025
Agric :
Total :$78,025
%Imprvd:lO0
% Owned:100
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
]995 Tx:$1,151.60
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But 'Is 'Nol: ~u.w..e..~
AG(NDA~I'I~M/%
8 1697
Owner :NEEDHAM ROBERT J & RITA A
CoOwner :CARL~JANE S MYERS .
Site :509 ROMA CT t203 NAPLES 33963 ',
Hail :8144 VIOLA ST SPRINGFIELD VA 22152
Xfered :01/10/90 Doc t: 1497-0772
:e : $102,000 Deed :
Amt: Loan :
tType: IntTy: ' ..
Lender :
Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) %2030R
:1497 PG 772
Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ·
Census :Tract 101.00 ... Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
Folio #:7980750052? '
· .... ' .Strap l:153254 2033A21
.. Land..~,: ...
"Struct :$78,025
Total :$78,025
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
'" Hillage:14.?594
1995 Tx:$1,151.60
-- Phone --
Ovner :
Tenant :
,_. : MetroScan/Collier
Owner :IMBRIANO TR ERNESTO
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~204 NAPLES 33963
Mail :509 ROMA CT 1204 NAPLES FL 33963
Xfered :01/26/90 Doc ~:1500-2124
Price :$101,000 Deed :
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2040R
:1500 PG 2124
:
[at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
%sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S Z:21
Folio ~:79807500543
Strap #:153254 2043A21
Lend :
struct :$78,025
Agric :
Total :$78,025
%Imprvd:lO0
% Owned:
Exempt :HOMESTEAD
Amount :$25,000
Mlllage:14.7594
1995 TX:$782.61
-- Phone --
Owner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
Owner :LINDA 3AKER INV INC
Si:= =509 ROMA CT ~205 NAPLES 33963
~Ta:.' :411 SIMCOE ST N OSHAWA CANADA
~f-_-r. d : 06/18/90 Doc ~: 1537-1010
Prl..' :$103,000 Deed :
Lo.~,~ u,t: Loan
land 3se:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Lega:t :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~205
S%~',. ?lat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Ce:.~,~ :Tract 101.00 Block 3
,_. . ....... : MetroScan/Collier
U,..,,~:cl' : IMBRIANO ERNESTO
.~'~_~e :509 ROMA CT %206 NAPLES 33963
}~a:~] :509 ROMA CT ~206 NAPLES FL 33963
~ f :L'ed :04/09/93 Doc ~: 1814-0820
p: =~ :$88,500 Deed :WARRANTY
Lo >.~ Ant: $ 40,000 Loan : CONVENTIONAL
Vest'i'>~e: IntTy: FIXED
Lendcr : PRIVATE
Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2060R
:1814 PG 82"
$',b/)') :~.t:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
.~--.n_~v.~. :Tract 101.00 Block 3
k;2:u: T:48S S:21
£olio ~ :79807500569
Strap ~: 153254 2053A21
Land :
Struct :$78,025
Agric :
Total : $7S, 025
%Imprvd: 100
% Owned:
Exempt :
Amount :
l{illage: 14.7594
1995 Tx: $1,151.60
-- Phone --
Owner
Tenant :
Folio ~:79807500585
Strap ~:153254 2063A21
Land :
Struct :$78,025
Agric :
Total :$78,025
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:100
Exempt :
Amount :
Millage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$1,151.60
-- Phone --
O-~ner :
Tenant :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not
,.-_~ ~..-., ~; ..... . - .
JAN 8 1997
, ................... : ~enro~can/~o~er
O~ner :HORTARTY MAURTCE F & BARBARA
CoO~ner :
Site :509 ROMA CT ~207 NAPLES 33963
Hail :7626 MARINER PT MAPLE GROVE MN 55311
Xfered :12/14/93 Doc 1:1894-0542
ce :$79,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY
Amt: $59,200 Loan : CONVENTIONAL
;tType: MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: VARIABLE
Lender :HOME SVGS A~ER
Lend Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2070R
:1894 PG 542
Sub/Plat=VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S S:21
* ................ : HetroScan/Collier
Owner :ANDREOULAKIS CHRIS & LUZ
CoOwner :
Site :509 ROMA CT #208 NAPLES 33963
Mail :6081 18TH AVE NW NAPLES FL 33999
Xfered :05/01/89 Doc 1:1437-0214
Price : $105,000 Deed
Loan Amt: Loan :
VestType: IntTy:
Lender :
Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM
Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2080R
:1437 PG 214
Lat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)
sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3
R:25E T:48S ~:21
Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft:
~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~
Folio ~:79807500608
Strap #:153254 2073A21
Land
Struct :$78,025
Agric :
Total :$78,025
%Imprvd:100
% Owned:100
Exempt
Amount
Hillage:14.7594
1995 Tx:$1,1~1.60
-- Phone --
owner =612-420-4805
Tenant :
Folio t:79807500624
Strap ~:153254 2083A21
Land
Struct =$80,325
A~ric
Total :$80,325
%I~prvd:lO0
% Owned:
Exempt
~ount :
M£11age:14.7594
1995 Tx:$1,185.56
-- Phone --
Owner ~941-598-2103
Tenant
%.
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,
.ot
COASTAL
ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS
INC
EXHIBIT
NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS
DESCRIPTION OF LAN'DS TO BE VACATED
A parcel of land lying in the southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25
East, Collier county, Florida being described as follow~:
Commencing at the southwest comer of said Section 21 nm N02°12'22"W along the west
line of said Section 21 for 1648.10 feet to an intersection will: I]}e westerly prolongation of
the south line of Vanderbilt Villas, a subdivision recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages $ and 6
of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line Ngg°56'0T'E 50.25
feet to the southwest corner of said Yanderbilt Villas subdivision and the POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence continue N89°56'07"E along the south line of said subdivision for
1301.54 feet to the southeast corner of said subdivision, said point being situated on the
north-south quarter line of the southwest quarter of said Section 21; Ihence along said north-
south quarter line S01°54'44"E 589.79 fi:et t~ ~.he northerly line of those lands recorded in
O.R. Book 1241, Page 727 of said F,~bhc Records; thence along said northerly llne
S87°47'41"W 1297.21 feet to the easterl7 right of way line of S-901 (formerly S.R. 865A);
thence along said easterly right of way line N02°14'31"W 638.39 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
The above describes an area of approximately 18.31 acres of land.
Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT~, INC.
FLORIDa, BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 2464
Richard J. Ewing, V.F.
Professional Surveyor and Mapper
Florida Certificate No. 5295
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATU'RI~'AND
THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A I'7_,OP,~A
LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER ..
CEC FILE NO. 95.145
DATE OF FIELD SUR\rEy:
DATE SIGNED:/o- z 2-;:~-
3106 S. HORSESHOE DRIVE · NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 s~ (941) 643-2324 o FAX (q
AG£N~)A JTI[I~
JAN 8 1997'
,1)
£ .XH!.B.Z.T "A"
frill
IIIII
llllllllllll;lllllllll
Rllllfllllllllllllfllll
IIIIIIIiil
IIII111111
CONSTRUCrlON AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
OF SUBDrVISION IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMEN'I~ entered into this/3 day of_ ~_~,_'SP ., 1996 between Gulfshore
Lake Villas, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "The Board".
1. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery of th[s Agreement, applied for
the approval by the Board of a certain plat of a subdivision to be known as:
NORTHSHORE LkKE VILLAS SUBDMSION
2. Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the
Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required
by said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for
the construction of the required improvements.
NOw, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. Developer will cause to be constructed: a potable water system, sanitary sewer
system, drainage, grading, paving and miscellaneous as outlined in Engineer's Cost Estimate
(attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereo0 within 36 months from
the date of approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the
required improvements.
2. Developer herewith tenders its subdivision performance securit ! (attached hereto
,457,~~~
JAN g 8
as Exhibit "B" and by reference made a .part hereof) ia the amount of
1
amount represents 10% of the total contract cost to complete construction plus I00% of the
estimate cost to complete the required improvements at the date of this Agreement.
3. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer 1cs cun,~lete
such improvements within the time required by the Land Development Code, Collier County,
after written notice to Developer, may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure
satisfactory completion of the required improvements.
4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement
of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have
been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director for
compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code.
5. The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the
statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify the Developer in writing of his
preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the Developer in writing of his refusal
to approve improvements, therewith specifying those conditions which the Developer must
fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements. However, in no event
shall the Development Services Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if
they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements
of this Agreement.
6. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period
of one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. After the one
year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the
Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development
Services Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements, and, if found to be still in
compliance with Collier County Land Development Code as reflected by final approv~u~-ju~_)
2 dAlq 2, 8 1997
Pg...__'<~) _
Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% of the subdivision performance security.
The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue
unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County.
7. Six (6) months after the execution of this Agreement and once within every six
(6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Development Services Director to reduce
the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work completed.
Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision security shall be
accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together
with the project records necessary for review by the Development Services Director. The
Development Services Director may grant the request for reduction, in the amount of the
subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request.
8. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations under this
Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator may call upon the
subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of
the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintaln; or cause
to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance
of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision
performance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify the Board, upon completion of
such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to,
engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or
consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the failure of the Developer to carry
out all of the provisions of this Agreement.
9. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained ar
binding upon the Developer respective successors and assigns of the Develop~
3
AGE~DA~TEM' ~,
J AH 2 8 1997
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement
to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this ..//3_ day of . .~,/. .... , 1996.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
~"yprpv~d'= to t~ and legal sufficient:
Collier Coun~ Attorney
GULFSHORE LAKE VILLAS, INC.
· t'~ lt. ~
Ge~mshman, President
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~y: ~ ,,~'---z/~ .,C-~ ~,-~,_5 %-- . .... ., ..~
~/~oh~n C. Norris, Chairman
Northshore Lake Villas SubdMsion
V. Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost
March, 1996
I. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION
1. Connect to existing
12" water main
1 EA
22" Steel Casing
(Jack & Bore)
1 I_3
10" PVC Water Main
C-900 Class 200
UNIT PRICE
10" PVC Water Main
C-900 Class 150
750.00
10,000.00
10" Gate Valve w/Box
Fire Hydrant Assembly,
Complete 6
35 LF 13.75
o
Permanent Sampling Point 1
2,850
EA
· Note: Includes Fittings
EA
EA
TOTAl, POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
13.25
675.00
1,715.00
800.00
750.00
10,000.00
481.25
37,762.50
2,700.00
10,290.00
800.00
62,783.75
II.
ITEM
1.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer
Main, 0'-6' Deep
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer
Main, 6'-8' Deep
UNIT PRICE
600 LF 20.23
331 LF 24.23
12,138.00
JAN 2 8 1997
o
I0.
11.
12.
10" PVC Sanitary Sewer
Main, 0'-6'
780 LF 30.23
10" PVC Sanitary Sewer
Main, 6'-8' Deep
356 LF 32.23
10" PVC Sanitary Sewer
Main 8'-10' Deep
623 LF 34.23
4' Manhole, Complete
0-6' Deep
3 EA
4' Manhole, Complete
6'-8' Deep
3 EA
4' Manhole, Complete
8'-10' Deep
6 EA
6" PVC San/tary Sewer
Laterals
1,336.00
6" PVC Single Cleanout
Assembly
1,542.00
6" PVC Double Cleanout
Assembly
1,748.00
Connect to Existing
P.S. 1.01.18
725 LF 9.59
3 EA
26 EA
1 EA
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
131.80
188.60
1,500.00
23,579.40
11,473.88
21,325.29
4,008.00
4,626,00
10,488.00
6,952.75
395.40
4.903.60
1,500.00
10%1: 0.45
III.
ITEM
2.
3.
4.
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
18" ADS Smooth Bore
15" RCP, Class III
18" RCP, Class III
24" RCP, Class III
240 LF
2O4 LF
961 LF
186 LF
15.00
28.68
32.09
42.80
3,600.00
5,850.72
30,838.49
7,9~0.80
Aq£NDA J~£M !
JAN g 8 1997
PS. ~
o
10.
Catch Basin, Complete
w/Grate
Junction Box
12 EA
2 EA
Flared End Section
Flared End Section 24'
Catch Basin, Complete
w/Grate Type 'C'
Control Structure
w/Grate Type 'C'
5 EA
1 EA
1 EA
1 EA
TOTAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
1,186.00
1,080.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
1,186.00
2,025.00
14,232.00
2, i60.0~
12,500.00
3,000.00
1,186.00
2,025.00
83,353.01
IV.
ITEM
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SRADIN0. PAVING & MISCELLANEOUS
DESCRIPTION
12" Compacted Subgrade
6" Limerock Base
8" !.imerock Base
3" Asphaltic Concrete
1~" Asphaltic Concrete
2' Valley Gutter
Type "E" Modified Curb
Type "A" Curb
Parking Bumpers
14" x 23" Ellip. RC-'P,
Class
OUAN. _l. JNrI' UNIT PRICE
10,842 SY .74
7,537 SY 3.25
372 SY 4.25
372 SY 4.70
7,537 SY 2.70
5,583 SY 5.25
190 LF 6.49
136 LF 3.75
5 EA .30
72 LF 33.75
TOTAL
8,023.08
24,495.25
1,581.00
1,748.40
20,349.90
29,310.75
1,233.10
510.00
150.00
2,430.00
JAN 2 8 1997
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Mitered End Sections
with concrete aprons. 2
Speed Limit Signs 4
Stop Sign & Stop Bar 1
Handicap Sign 1
Pool Par'king Striping 1
Solid White Thermoplastic
Turn Arrows 2
Regrade Existing Swales 500
4" Concrete Sidewalk
4' Wide 2600
Landscaping 1
Street Lighting 1
EA 1,150.00 2,300.00
EA 53.00 212.00
EA 232.00 232.00
EA 75.00 75.00
ES 250.00 250.00
EA 85.00 170.00
LF 15.00 7,500.00
LF 11.25 29,250.00
LS 20,000.00 20,000.00
ES 10,000.00 10,000.00
159,820.48
TOTAL GRADING, PAVING & MISCELLANEOUS
AGENDA, dIEM
JAN g 8 1997
EXHIBIT "A"
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
IV.
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
DRAINAGE
PAVING, CONCRETE, MISCELLMCEOUS
SUBTOTAL $415,367.69
TOTAL (ROUNDED TO NEAREST $1,000)
110% OF TOTAL $457,600.00
$ 62,783.75
$109,410.45
$ 83,353.01
$416,000.00
AGEN DA.JT[I~, ~
JAN 2 8 1997
RESOLUTIO.~; NO. 97
3 RESOLUTION AU~I~ORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE O? t;ORTHSHORE L~J~E VILLAS
: 4 REPLAT, A P~EPLAT OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT ~:O~; AS NOR'~HORE
5 LAKE VILLAS, A3{D AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY P~CORDED
~ 6 PLAT OF NORTHSHORE L~dfE VIL[~S ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED LEGAL
~ 7 DESCRIPTION, PETITION AV-96-036
~ 8 ~ERF-AS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,
T 9 Florida, on August 13, 1996 approved the plat of Northshore Lake
~ 10 Villas for recording; and
: ll ~EREAS, Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Incorporated has filed for a
12 replat of said land~; and
.~ 13 ~EREAS, except as provided for in this Resolution, this replat
-- 14 does not exWcinguish or in anyway affect the dedications contained in
-- 15 the previous plat of these lands; and
· 16 6~-=-P~F-AS, Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Incorporated desires to vacate
~ 17 the previously recorded plat as descriked in Exhibit "A"; and
~ 18 ~-HEREAS, the granting of the vacation ~ill not adversely affect
~ 19 the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners;
20 and
- 21 ~'HEREA$, this parcel, the approve~ plat of Ncrthshcre t.~k~ Villas
~ 22 Replat, is a replat of a previously a~proved and recorded !)1~,
23 ~;orthshore Lake Villas, and the filing and recording of thfs aooroved
24 plat shall not affect access to lots previously conveyed uader the
.. 25 t:orthshore Lake Villas plat.
, 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED A2;D ORDERED BY THE BO~D OF CO~;TY
= 27 CO.-U2~.I$$IONER$ OF COLLIER COMITY, FLORIDA, that the plat of b'rthshore
' 28 Lake Villas Replat, a part of a previously approved and recorded plat,
- 29 Northshore Lake Villas, is hereby approved for recording and the
~ 30 dedications contained on the plat of Northshore Lake Villas. Replat,
_ 31 are hereby accepted, and those lands described in Exhibit "A" are
~ 32 hereby vacated. Said vacation shall become valid and effective upon
- 33 recordation of the subject replat.
' 34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
lO
11
12
13
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED A~;D ORDERED that the Clerk of the Ci£cuit
Court shall make proper notation of this action upon the previous plat
and record a certified copy of this replat and a cerllf~.ed copy of the
vacation resolution in the Official Records of Collier County.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote
favoring same.
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COM3~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COU~TY, FLORIDA
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
24
Approved as to form and legal
sufficiency:
Heidi F. ~-hton
Assistant Collier County Attorney
By:
CKAI P~MAR
25
26
27
29
3O
31
32
33
34
EXECU IVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF "FIDDLER'S CREEKt PEPPER
TREE VILLAGE AND BENT CREEK VILLAGE"
OBJECTIVE:
To approve the final plat of "Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village
and Bent Creek Village", a subdivision of lands located in Section
22, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the
construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Fiddler's
Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village". These documents
are in compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida
State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid. It is the intent of
the developer to construct the improvements for this project prior to
recording of the plat or to furnish the required amount of approved
security for recording purposes at a later date. This procedure
would be in conformance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land
Development Code.
Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of
"Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village" be
approved with the stipulation that the final plat not be recorded
until the required improvements have been constructed and accepted or
until the approved security is received to guarantee completion of
the required improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the County is none.
The project cost is $484,648.70, to be borne by the
developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a) Water & Sewer
b) Drainage,
Paving & Grading
- $220,449.30
- $264,199.40
The County will realize revenues as follows:
Fund: 113
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $9,443.58
Fees are based on a construction estimate ¢
$484,648.70 and were paid in November, 199(
f
· JAN 2, 8 1997
Executive Summary
Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and bent Creek Village
Page 2
The breakdown is as follows:
a)
Plat Review Fee
($425.000 + $4/a0)
-$ 543.20
b)
Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.50% const, est.) - $1,102.25
Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.425% const, est.)- $1,122.85
c)
Construction Inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (1.5% const, est.) - $3,306.74
Drainage,
Paving & Grading (1.275% const, est- $3,368.54
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional
approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's
Office for the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the final plat of
"Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village"
with the following stipulations:
1)
That the final plat not be recorded until the required
improvements have been constructed and accepted or until
approved security is received for the uncompleted
improvements and that construction shall be completed within
36 months of the date of this approval.
2)
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Construction
and Maintenance Agreement.
3) That no building permits be issued until the final plat is
recorded.
JAN g 8 1997
Executive Summary
Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village
Page 3
PREPARED BY:
~ohn R. Houldsworth, senior Engineer
Engineering Review
REVI~ED BY:
~homas E. Kuck, P.E.
Engineering Review Manager
Donald W. Arnold
Planning Services J~,rector
~n~ A. Cautero, Adminis~?ator L ~ Services
Co,unity Development & Envlronmen~a~
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
JRH: ew
Date
Date
Date
J/ N 2, 8 1997
p~. c~
~ulf ,
of
ION
MARCO ~
ISLAND
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
PRIOR TO RECORDING OF PLAT
THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF PLAT AGREEMENT entered into this
day ~,f' 1997 between 951 Land Holdings Joint Venture hereinafter referred to as
De,':Ioper , and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter
re,Cc, tred to as "The Board".
RECITALS
Developer has, simultaneously xvith the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the
approval by the Board ora certain plat of subdivision to be know as:
"Fiddler's Creek Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village"
Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code allows the Developer to
construct the improvements required by said subdivision regulations prior to recording
the final plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and ag-tee as follov,'s:
Developer ,,,,'ill cause to be constructed site improvements including water, sewer
irrigation, roadway, drainage, and street lighting withSn 36 months fi.om the date of
approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the
required improvements.
Developer herewith agrees to construct said improvements prior to recording said
subdivision plat and the Board of County Commissioners shall not approve the plat for
recording until said improvements have been completed.
Upon completion of said improvements, the developer shall tender its subdivision
performance security in the mount of $48,464.87 which represents 10% of the total
contract cost to complete construction. Upon receipt of said subdivision performance
security by the Development Services Director, the Developer may request the Board of
County Commissioners to approve the subdivision plat for recording and grant
preliminary acceptance of said plat.
The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of
substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final pr >iect records have
"°.
JAil g 8 1997
o
been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director tbr
compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code.
The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt ~,' the
statement of substantial completion either: a) notify the Developer in writi;?., of his
preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the developer Jn ,qr'[i'irlg of his
refusal to approve the improvements, therewith specifying those conditi.,,:' ,,,l,ich thc
Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the. i.mpr",veme;;ts.
However, in no event shall the Development Services Director refir.-.e pre!imi~ary
approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted fbr approval in
accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.
The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum per/orl ,~( one
year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. Attet th:. one year
maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shaI! p:;:ti.-'w the
Development Services Director to inspect the improvements. The Deve'iorm',:n'. So'/ices
Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements and, if fount; ~,. b:' ':rill in
compliance with Collier County Land Development Code as reflected b? ,.qa.?,l appr, val
by the Board, the Board shall release the 10% subdivision performance =.ecufiq,,. The
Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shal! continue
unless or until the Board accepts maintenance resp'onsibility for the County.
In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its oblig:~tt,)ns ,ar~,ict thSs
Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator r,'~.~;. ,'.:!!
the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, ,-~-~.:.,,.. at',:".
maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right ~ c~ .,.qt~uct
and maintain, or cause to be constructed and maintained, pursuant to public adw,, ~scrnent
and receipt of acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Deve{vper, as
principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pa3, and to
indemnify the Board, upon completion of construction, the final cost to the Board thereof,
including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, Ioge'.,"t,-r wi0'.
damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on accoar, t of the
failure of the Developer to carry out all of the provisions of the Agreement.
All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon
the respective successors and assigns of the Developer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives this day of ,1997.
Signed, kealed and delivered
in ~f:
Witness
(print.or type name)
(print or type/nme)
951 Land Holdings Joint Ventue
a Florida General Partnership
By:
GB 100, Ltd., a Florida Limited
Partnership
By:
By:
GB~,a Florida Co~j~oration
Aubrey .! errao.~
,ub. re_y. J.~_ e President and
not individually'
ATTEST:
Dwight Brock, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
David C. Wei'~el', Collier County Attorney
Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida
By:
Timothy L. Hancohk, Chairman
W:\1993\93132',FO ILM S\C&M PEPT1LWPD
AG E ~lp~JTJE ~d~
No. ~
JAN ? 8 1997
"'- 7
EXECUTIVE SUMR4ARY
WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
PELICAN MARSH, UNIT EIGHT, PHASE ONE
OBJECTIVE: The Board of County ~,.snj~O. ssioners, Ex-Officio the
Go,'.~.tning Board of the County Wate;-'.]ew::.r Di~t:'ict, to accept the
n~.~..~".~,-constructed water and sewc.~ ~ac:,. ~.:.~ ~:~ to serve Pelican
M~r.::],. Uni~ Eight, Phase One and author:; z~ the recordation of the
app~'opriate legal documents.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The developer of Pelican Ma:sh, Unit Eight, Phase One has
constructed the water and sewer facilities within dedicated
utility easements to serve this development. See attached
location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other relateC documents have been
sub,n]tted to Engineering Review Service~ in order for the County
to accept the water and sewer facilities i.n accordance with County
Or~J.::ances 78-10 and 79-33.
3) The water and sewer facilitie:: ws. lJ be: upon acceptance by
the Board, operated and maintained by the County Utilities
Divs. sion under a one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by
the developer.
4) The on-site inspection of tho sewer facilities and water
fac~£ities has been conducted by the :'ounty Engineering Inspection
se,.~J, on with the finding that the ~te: ~nd 5ewer facilities have
bee~, constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and
Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been rev).ewed by t~]e County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) Surety for utilities
Improvement acceptance.
is covered under the Subdivision
FISCAL IMPACT: The water and sewer facilities were constructed
without cost to the County Water-Sewer District. During the first
yea~', the water and sewer facilities are under a Contractual
Guarantee. After that time, the cost' of operating and maintaining
the water facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
JAN g 8 1997
Executive Summary
Pelican Harsh, Unit Eight, Phase One
Page Two
GROWTH biANAGE~4ENT IMPACT: The sewer facilities will be connected
to the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and the
wa%.~r facilities to the County Reqional Water Treatment Plant.
This project will not create a new impact, as it has been planned
for within facilities available at present
P~ECOb~4ENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-.Officio the Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District,
accept the water and sewer facilities for Pelican Marsh, Unit
Eight, Phase One, with the following stipulations:
The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be
placed into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be
issued until the following items have been furnished:
1) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of these systems into service,
and;
2) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements,
and;
3) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire
hydrant for ownership and maintenance
4) Receipt of payment for water usage from Utilities
bacteriological testing
for
PREPARED BY:
hirley~Nix, E~gi'neering Technician
II
Date
REVIEWED BY:
'~ Thomas E. Kuck, P.E.
EngJneering'Review Services Manager
Date
JAN 2 8 1997
Executive Summary
Pelican Marsh, Unit EighT, Phase One
Page Three
attachments
Date
J/~N 2 $ '1997
P~. ~
VAND.
B£AC½
PINE
RI DO E
cou~s xl
VICTOPSA
PAP. K
~ -- LOCIY~ION
~OATEt~EY
LOCATION MAP
JAN 2 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "TARPON
COVE"
OBJECTIVE:
To approve for recording the final plat of "Tarpon Cove", a
subdivision of lands located in Section 18, Township 48 South, Range
26 East, Collier County, Florida.
CONSIDERATION:
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the
construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Tarpon
Cove". These documents are in compliance with the County Land
Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have
been paid. It is the intent of the developer to record the plat
prior to construction of the improvements. The security in the
amount of 110% of the total cost of the required improvements is
being covered by construction and maintenance agreement and an
Irrevocable Letter of Credit. This would be in conformance with the
County Land Development Code - Division 3.2.9.
Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Tarpon
Cove" be approved for recording.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the County is none.
The.project cost is $560,638.80 (estimated) to be
borne by the developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a) Water & Sewer
b) Drainage,
Paving, Grading
- $236,091.00
- $324,547.80
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $616,702.68
The County will realize revenues as follows:
Fund: 113
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $11,753D7
Fees are based on a construction estimate of
$560,638.80and were paid in December, 1997.
JAN 2 8 1997
I
.----
Executive Summary
Tarpon Cove
Page 2
The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($425.00 + $4./ - $ 814.20
b)
c)
Construction Drawing Review Fee
Water &
Sewer (.50% const, est.) - $1,880.20
Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.425% const, est- $1,379.33
Construction Inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (1.5% const, est.) - $3,541.36
Drainage,
Paving, Grading (1.275% const, est.)
GROWTH MANAGEMENT I____MPACT:
- $4,137.98
The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional
approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's
Office for the project.
~ECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of
"Tarpon Cove" with the following stipulations:
Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security to
guarantee completion of the subdivision improvements.
Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of "Tarpon Cove."
Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached construction
and maintenance agreement.
4. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the
required improvements have received preliminary acceptance.
PREPARED BY:
John R. Houldsworth, Se~nior Engineer Date
Engineering Review
REVIEWED BY:
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E.
Engineering Rev~w Manager
Date
Donald W. Arnold · Date
Plan~-n~-~ervice~/Director _--'
~;i~c'ent A. Caut~o, Administrator Date
Community Development & Environmental Services
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
AG£NC~JT£M\
'~"~AN 2 8 1997
0
PR&ECT S
!
I
LOCA
TION MAP
JAN 2 8 1997
COLLIER COUNTY LANI) DEVELOPMENT CODE
CONSTRUCTION ANI) MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS entered into this day of .__, 1997, between WCI
COMMUNITIES LIMITED PARTN'ERSHIP hereina~ter referred to as "Developer," and the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Board".
RECITALS:
A. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the approval
by the Board ora certain plat ora subdivision to be known as: TARPON COVE
B. Division 3.2 of the Collier County L~nd Development Code requires the Developer to post
appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required by said subdivision
regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construction of the
required improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of' the foregoing premises and mutual covenants
hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
Developer will cause to be constructed: The paving, drainage, potable
water, irrigation water, sanitary sewer, and street lighting
improvements for Tarpon Cove v. ithin twenty-four (24) months from
the date of approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements
hereinafter referred to as the "required improvements".
Developer herev, ith tenders its subdivision performance securiD' (attached
hereto as Exhibit "A "and by reference made a part hereof) in the amount of
S616,702.68 which amount represents 10% of the total contract cost to
complete construction plus 100% of the estimate cost to complete the
required improvements at the date ofthis Agreement.
In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer to
complete such improvements within the time required by the Land
Development Code, Collier County, may call upon the subdivision
performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required
improvements.
The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a
statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the
final project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by
the Development Services Director for compliance with the Collier County
Land Development Code.
JAN 8 8 1997
The Development Services Director shall, within sixty. (60) days of receipt
of the statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify' the Developer
in v, Titing O~' his preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify' the
developer in writing of' his refusal to approve improvements, therewith
specify'lng those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to
obtain the Dkector's approval of'the improvements. However, in no event
shall the Development Services Director refuse preliJ'ninary approval of
the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval
in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.
The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum
period of. one year after preliminary approval by the Development
Services Dh'ector. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer
has terminated, the Developer shall petition the Development Services
Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Services
Director or his designee shall Inspect the improvements and, if found to be
still in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code as
reflected by final approval by the Board, the Board shall release the
remaining ]0% of the subdivision performance security. The Developer's
responsihiJiry for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue
unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the
County.
Six (6) months after the execution of this A_m'eement and once within every
six (6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Development
Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision
performance security on the basis of work complete. Each request for a
reduction in the dollar amount of. the subdivision performance security
shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the
Developer's engineer together with the project records necessary for revie~v
by the Development Services Director. The Development Services
Director may grant the request for a reduction in the amount of the
subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the
date of the request.
In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations
under this Agreement, upon certification of such failure the Count).'
Administrator may call upon the subdivision performance security to
secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of the required
improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintain, or
cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and
receipt and acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The
Developer, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall
be liable to pay and to indemnify' the Board, upon completion of such
construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not
limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any
damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on
2
NO. ~
,lAN 8 997
p~,. ~
accoun! o£th¢ failure of the Developer to fulfill all of the provisions of this
Agreement.
Ail of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be
binding upon the Developer and the respective successors and assigns of
the Developer,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representative this day of ,1996.
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SIGNED, SEALED ANq2) DELrVERED IN
THE PRESENCE OF:
Developer
WCI Communities Limited Parmership,
a Delaware Limited Partnership
By: ~. ~'~0. ~)~2~
Susan Hebel Watts
Printed or Typed Name
Senior Vice President
Title
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
David C. Welgel
Count'3' Attorney
By:.
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIO~RS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Chain'nan
JAN 2 8 1997
J.&NL'A.RY I0, !997
B £%EF']CIARY.
BANK OF BOSTON
FIRS.-,,,-,. ~'' '-' '"'*",,.,,,,-.. 8A~K OF' BOSTON
POST,.,:r"¢ ~. r"c.,_ B('v,. 1763
DON'=O:.;. ,MASSAC.'-iUSE~TS 02105 LI.S.A,
STA_NDBY I. ETTE ~ O~F .~KE DIT .~0061444
V,'C[ CO.',f~IUNI FEES LE~flTED
. P,~GIT?,'£ RS HiP
~.0~ LAU'AEL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 500
i N,-',.PLE$, F'L 34108
PRE~ENTED TO THE F]F_ST :XATION.~L BANK OF E~OSTON AT 150 FEDERAL
FLOOR, BOSTON. 5'.A 02116 O.X OR BEFOR.E JA, NUARY I0, 1998.
!
TEiS C&FDIT L..(, .L:. bE '~'-LL IL) I...; Iu JANL' ~R'~' 1_, Iy9.S, .,~N'D 5EL-LI.L TRER
.4L'TO'vl.-~" ,- ': ..... tV,,,' .......... '- '
, l' .A:... :. :,:.L ', _
.:,:,'.x'i'~T R.~ '~R',' ,DF ]'-rS If~.: k C.":L£'.;$ AT L£A51' $~.~'fY (60) D.~YS PRIOR TO
.x'] ~2':R~Ai~':' D, Tk:. -:'~ :- ;: ;'1:.- 1' >'.:. T]OY:~ I. ~A.','F. OF BOSTON NO'ITFIF, S T
1997
~,'~'Y SUCH ?
F' ,:, .:; E.
NVE REMEDY LFTAI~LL~ (,1.:R LTLR. E N OC~I.E LE]~R OF C~D~ 500614J4 ~ YOUR
FAVOR FOR ACCOUN'F G? ~ CI COM31L'b~:~ L~I~D PARTt,~ WtlICE IS
A A.I_AB_E AG.~'ST fF:Z& ENTA~ON OF ~ OUR ~P~(~) D~WN Ob' 2~ F~T
N.~i'/ON.&L 3.~.~.. OF 5:;570~ ;,% 51'3~T L~ 70 .~5 AGG~GA~ .~MOUNT OF
['5 DOLL_~PC!2 A~' AC CGS~'.(N'~KD BY g~NEFiCL~Y'S STA~b~NT PU~OR~DLY
SIGNED BY T~,E COLN~ ?~;(~.GER. CERi'~YLX'~:
-wCI COM.xIu'NTTL'S LLMt~D P.~YN'EP~E~ ~ FA~ED TO MEET OR COb~LETE
THE I~QI;~b2t, IL~'15 FOR CO~STRUCT~O:~ OF U'~O~MES~ TO ~'CLUDE ST~ET
L1GUTLXG. STO~Z, D~,~'AGE. [(O.~D~'.&Yt~A P~'G, POTABLE WATER
SAN[TAK~' SEV, EF..'~'OECE~L~IN ~' THE PRO~EC'f~NOXVN AS T.~ON COVE. PERMIT
~.~ 9~;-2U .&ND ~r' i-~. OK A F~'.a~ INSPECTIO~ ~A~SFACTORY TO COLLAR
COUNYY. PU~U~X'T TO COLLIER COUNT~ O~'.~'CE NO. 91-I02. HAS NOT BEEN"
PE~'OPOIED, ~N'D A SATLqYACTO~Y ALTE~X'ATi~VE PE'.R~'O~',L~NC~ SECU~Y
NOT BEE~' PRO~ED TO .~ FO~',LALLY AC~ri~ED BY ~E BENE~CL~Y.'
I
EACH D~ D~W5 L~ER ~ LE~ER OF C~DIT MC'ST BE.~ b~ON ~ FACE
~E CLAUSE:' DK-ZWN I~DER ~YOC.(ELE 5T~N'DBY LE~R OF C~D~ 50661444
DA~D J.(NUr~Y lO, !~ OF ~E ~T NA~OS.~ BANK OF BOSTON, BOSTON, MA
I
I
THIS LE~ER OF C~IT 3~TS FO~T~ L~ FULL Tile TE~IS OF OUR UNDERTA~'G,
.(x D S L. CR E. 5 D ~K F~x G ~L NOT ~ .(N ~ ~ .~y BE MOD~D. ~MENDED, OR
.(x~vL~D g~ REFE~'ZhCE TO .(x~ DOCUNiEb~.~'S~UMENT OR AG~E~IE~
I
~'E HE,BY ~G~:E ~'r[~ YOU ~T DK~(S) D~.~' ~'DER ~N~ ~
~H ~E ~M5 OF ]~ LE2TER OF C~D1T ~L BE DULY HONO~D
BANK OF BOSTON
THE :~R3T .........~, ,~,-,_: BANK OF EOSTON
PCST CF~!C~E [~OX ~763
BOSTON :,¢~..SAC~u;~E~T.S 02~05 U.S.A.
PAGE 2, LETI~R OF CF~DZ~ ~O. :,0:'.5t~4~
;
( A..,r~ ,-. cL'~ C~ ~O TEE -L'~:~OE?,~ CUSTOMS A~'D PK~C~ICE
FOR DOCL~IE~TA}::~ f'.,r~c .
~EE A'I~Z~TIOS Gt' GUR LE'i'i~K 07 C?~9IT DE~A~TbfENT, AT 150
~FE~CE h%:5iEER A5 LNDICA~D A.,O% _. TELEPHONE ~'QU~5
/.';~i ./ /~
JAN ~ 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERX. qCES
AGREEMENT WITH HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS FOR WORK
ASSOCIATED WITH THE BIG MARCO AND CAPRI PASS IN'LET
MANAGEMENT PLAN.
QB~ECTIVE: To obtain approval of an Amendment to the Professional Services
Agreement with Humiston & Moore Engineers to implement an erosion control project
associated with the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan,
.~0NSIDERATIONS: Humiston & Moore Engineers are currently in the process of
completing the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan. Specific
recommendations are included in the plan for managing the inlet to mitigate impacts to
adjacent beaches, along with estimates of probable project costs, to ensure long-term
protection to the inlet system and adjacent beach systems. The adjacent beach system
impacted by this inlet is Hideaway Beach.
Due to several rapidly eroding areas along Hideaway Beach, potential damage to
residential properties and conservation easements is imminent. Hurniston & Moore
Engineers has provided recommended alternatives in the Inlet Management Plan to control
this erosion. The Marco Island Beach Renoufishment Advisory Committee reviewed
these alternatives and recommended that immediate action be taken to implement
procedures necessary to obtain approval of an erosion control project for Hideaway
Beach. As such, on February 6, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Amendment No. 1 to the subject Professional Services Agreement. Such authorized the
design and permitting of erosion control structures in the form of"T" groins, two at the
rapidly eroding areas at South Point and three along the conservation easement in Royal
Marco Point, as described in the conceptual design presented in the interim draft Inlet
Management Plan report on the Hideaway Beach erosion impacts.
These seN'ices have now been completed. Therefore, Amendment No. 2 to this
Agreement has been prepared to obtain the services necessary for preparation of
construction plans and specifications and for services during construction of this project.
The ex'tent of surveys required for final certification are undetermined at this time. Upon
receipt of the permit conditions, such services will be obtained through a work order
under Contract No. 96-2550, Agreement for Fixed Term Surveying and Photograrnmetric
Services
Executive Summary
Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost:
Fund:
Cost Center:
Project Number:
I;28,085.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
(195) Tourist Development - 60%.
(I10406) Beach Renoufishment/Pass Maintenance.
(80221) Capri/Big Marco Pass Inlet Management.
Approval of a budget amendment is necessary whereby funds from
the reserves of Fund 195 would be transferred to Account No. 195-
11 0406-631400-80221 for this obligation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACTi None
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
That the Board of County Commissioners:
Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Hurniston &
Moore Engineers for the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan.
Approve the necessary budget amendment,
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Amendment.
Harry E. Huber, Project Manager IH
Office~/~oject s Management
RE'~rIEWED BY: ~Adolfo A. {~onzalez,~rector
Office)of Capital Projects MTagement
Raymo'hd W. Mill~r,¥.E,'Interim Administrator
Public Works Division
REVIEWED BY:
attachment
Date: /,IS"'. 9 ~
Marco Island Beach Renourishment Advisory Cornm/ttee
Humiston & Moore Engineers
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
CAPRI PASS AND BIG MARCO PASS INLET MANAGEMENT PLAN
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the Capri Pass and Big Marco Pass
Inlet Management Plan Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter
referred to as the "Agreement") between the Board of County
Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner") and Humiston &
Moore Engineers, P.A., 10641 Airport Road North, Suite 29, Naples,
Florida 34109 (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant") is made and
entered into this day of ~, 19__, by and
between Owner and Consultant.
WI TN E S S E TH:
WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Consultant is providing
engineering and surveying services concerning the Capri Pass and Big
Marco Pass Inlet Management Plan, and said services being more fully
described in Schedule A of the Agreement; and,
WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a proposal, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B', for provision of additional services
necessary to obtain approval and implementation of Hideaway Beach T-
Groin Construction Phase Services; and
WtIEREAS, the Consultant represents that it has expertise in the
type of professional services that will be required for the project.
NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are fully incorporated and made part of
this Agreement No. 2 to the Agreement.
2. Schedule I3, Attachments A and C, shall be revised as contained
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
3. Article Five, Compensation: Compensation by the Owner for
services rendered in accordance with this Amendment No. 2 to the
Agreement by Consultant shall not exceed an aggregate amount of
$28,085.00 as provided in Exhibit "B' attached hereto without an
appropriate change order or amendment to this Agreement.
Otherwise, the Agreement, as amended, remains in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Capri
Pass and Big Marco Pass Inlet Management Plan the day and year first
written above.
Witnes~,.j
(2)
Print/Type~Nam~
~l~neSS
Print/Type Name
Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A.
Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E.
President
(corporate seal)
-2-
DATED:
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOblERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman
Approved as to form and
Assistant County Attorney
H£Hllmendmcnttjas'form
-3-
HUMISTON
MOORE
ENGINEERS
EXHIBIT "B"
December 19, 1996
Mr. Harold E. Huber, P.E.
Office of Capital Projects Management
Collier County Government Center
3301 East Tamiami Trail, Bldg. D.
Naples, FL 33962
Re: '.-lideaway Beach T-Groin Construction Services Proposal, H&M File No. 3021TC.
We are pleased to provide you with this proposal for professional services on the
referenced project. It' is our understanding that the proposed services would be Included
under our current contrac~ for the Big Marco and Capri Pass inlet management plan as
implementation of preliminary plan recommendations.
The proposed scope of work will include:
Basic Services
1. Prepare an opinion of probable cost of the T-groins and the beach fill.
2. Prepare construction plans and specifications for bidding and construction.
3. Respond to questions form prospective bidders, attend a pre-bid meeting, and review
and make recommendations on the bids.
Total cost of Basic Services
$ 9,570.00
Additional Services
1. Construction observations to include up to 30 site visits, daily meetings with
contractor, observation and documentation of the progress of the work, review and
make recommendations on contractor's requests for change orders, based upon a
construction period of 6 weeks.
2. Coordination with Collier County, the Marco Island Beach Renourishment Advisory
Committee, and the Hideaway Beach Assodation during construction review and
make recommendations on contractor payment requests.
3. Reimbursable expenses to include copies of construction plans and specifications (10
copies), and miscellaneous expenses including but not limited to: film, photo
processing, copies, faxes, and survey supplies.
4. Provide agency final certification based upon surveys to be provided by Agnoli Barber
and Brundage under a Fixed Term Contract.
Estimated cost of Additional Services $18,515.00
Total Proposal Amount
$28,085.00
EIl~BIT "B"
Note that item 4 above calls for surveys to be provided by Agnoli Barber and Brundage
under their Fixed Term Agreement with Collier County, as has been done previously for
the design surveys. It should also be noted that the permits when issued will include
monitoring requirements. When those monitoring conditions become known, we will
provide you with and additional proposal to futfill the agency requirements.
We propose to provide you with these services on a time and materials basis and will bill
you monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule. If this as agreeable to you,
plea.se provide us with a modification to our contract and authorization to proceed.
Sincerely yours,
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E.
Attachments
HUMIS1ON & MOOgE ENGINE[ItS - NAPLES, rLOItlDA ,,~
HUMISTON
MOORE
ENGINEERS
AND P[ AMITTI~.~
EXHIBIT "B'
FEE BCHEDULE
APRIL 15, 1996
HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS
Principal Engineer ........................ $100.00/hr
Staff Engineer ............................. $65.00/hr
Technician ................................. $45.00/hr
Administrative Assistant ................... $30.00/hr
Facsimile ................................... $1.00/pg
Copies (in house) ........................... $0.05/pg
Mileage (local <20 miles) .................. No Charge
Mileage .................................... $.29/mile
Telephone .................................. No Charge
All out of pocket expenses not covered above will be billed as
expenses and included with the monthly invoice. There will be a 10%
markup on all expenses not specifically listed above as well as for
any necessary subconsultants or laboratory fees. Invoicing will be
provided on a monthly basis unless specified differently in the
contract. Payments are due upon receipt of invoice. A late payment
charge of 1.5% per month, calculated from the date of invoice, may
be imposed on any unpaid balance which remains unpaid more than 30
days from the date of invoice.
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE AND
AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND
DECLARATION OF EASEMENT CONCERNING THE MAX A. HASSE, JR. COMMUNITY
PARK LOCATED ON GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD.
D.B.,[EJT,.IJX~: That the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to
execute the attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement concerning the Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Community Park.
~: A Declaration of Easement has been prepared and approved by the County
Attorney's Office which will be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The
recorded document will provide notification to all interested parties of the 6xistence ora road right-of-
way easement on the Max A. Hasse, Jr. Community Park.
Resolution 96-396 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the acquisition of
property necessary to improve Golden Gate Boulevard, from C.R. 951 to Wilson Boulevard.
F~: The recordation of the approved Resolution and Declaration of Easement in the
-,,~ Public Records of Collier County, Florida in an amount not to exceed $200.00 will be paid fi.om
, i account number 338-163650-63041 (Golden Gate Boulevard).
:NONE
~ ~, ' N: That the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the
Chairman to execute the attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement concerning the Max A.
Hasse, Jr. Community Park located on Golden Gate Boulevard; authorize staffto record all documents
necessary in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida in order to obtain clear title to the property.
PREPARED BY: '
DATE: _~-- \ k~-~ ~
Tim Richardson, Real Property Specialist
Real Property Management Department
REVIEWED BY: /~""'"~' ~ DATE:
A. N. Korti, Project Manager
Offic~ of Capit~,.projects Management
/,\ i -....'7 -
REVIEWED BY: ~ DATE:
Adolfo A. Go~aleziSP.E..,-D'~rector
Of F/w,~f Capital Pr. ojec,ts Management
Raymond ....... W. Miller~ ' , P.E.'---~ Interim Ad' '~' 'ministrator
Public Works Division
lo
2~
]~
~o
RESOLUTION NO. 9
RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COL,'N'I~'.
FLOR/DA, AUTHORIZING THE DECLARATION OF A ROAD KIGHT-OF.WAY EASEMENT.
WR'EKEAS, Collier County is desirous of c'ncumbenng propcmj curet-rely o~'ncd b) Colh¢?
County w~th a toad nlht-of-way e~scmcnt described as foliow~, to wit:
The South 25 feet oF thc North ?$ feet of Tract 96, Golden Ostc Estates, Unit No. 4, as recorded in Plat
Book 4, Page '/9 of the Public Re. corcis of Collier County. Florida, and
WHEREAS, '~c &scribed easement is '' neccsnry clement of the Oold~ Gate Bou!evard
Expansion Project (^pproved By Resolution Number 96-396); ,,nd
W)tEKEAS, thc ease'mc-ne w/Il allow Colhct County to proceed ~nth the expansion project m a
t:mcly fashion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUN"I'Y COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR/DA, that:
I. Thc Boazd of County Commissioners, hereby al~rovcs the Declaration of Easement closer:bed ~,
Exhibit
This Resolution adopted this ~ day of~, 199..._, after motion, second and major.y.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COb'N']~', FLOKI'tJA
ATTEST: By:.
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
By:
Deputy Clerk
T~, Chairman
Approved as to legal f'orm
and sufficiency:
He,dj F. Ashton
Assis~%m County Anomcy
PROJECT: Golden Gate Boulevard
PARCEL: Ms A. Hasse Community Park/128
DECLARATION OF EASEMENT
THIS DECLARATION is made this day oF____, 199 ., b.', Cc'lher
County, a polmcal subdivision the State of Florida, having a maihng address '~ 3.~Gi East
Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred Io as, ' Declarant.'
Declarant is Ibc owner or certain real property siluated in Collier Counly, Florida, more
fully described as Follows, to wit:
Thc South 25 Feet orthe North ?$ Feet of Tract 96, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No
4, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page '/9 of the Public Records or Colher Count.',-.
Florida, herema~er referred to as the "Property."
DecIaranl hereby declares, lhal Ibc Property is, and shall be held, Irans£e."r.e~,!.
conveyed, used and occupied in accordance with and subjec! [o a non-cxcluswe ¢ascme:;:
pfivileg~ ~o cn~cr upon, cons~c~ and maintain road right.of, way, sidewalk, drainage
facihties on the Prope~y, hereinafter retched lo ~ the "Easement."
The Easement, as set forth in this Declaration, shall oind, and Ihe benefits thereof shah
inure to the Declarant and its represematives, agents, successors and assigns.
rN WITNESS ~dEKEOF, Declarant has caused these presents to be exe:u:cd th.- da::
and ye~' above wntlen.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COM.MISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
Deputy Clerk
By:.
Chairman
Approved as to legal form
Md sufficiency:
Heidi F. Ashlon
Assistant County Attorney
EXHiBiT "A"
Page ,. of..
.EXECUTIVE $1?M.MARY
^PPROVE ^ BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING CARRY FORWARD ~MOUNT$ FROM FY
1996 FOR COUNT~'IDE CIP PROJECTS IN' FUND $01.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain BCC approval ora budget amendment that will allow unexpended funds budgeted for
CounD~,4de CIP projects to be carried forward and re-appropriated in the FY 1997 budget.
CONSIDERATIONS: Funds were appropriated in FY 1996 for Countywide CIP projeas. Staffwas unable to
encumber all the appropriated funds before the end of the fiscal year. These fimds are still required to complete
the approved projects. In addition, the budget amendments re-budgets $373,200 in reimbursements from Fire
Districts for the 800 MHz Project that were not received in F~'96.
FISCAL IMPACT: These unencumbered funds were anticipated for carry forward in the preparation of the FY
1997 Counts~vide ClP budget.
FUND PROJECTS RESERVES TOTAL
301 214.275 258,534 $474,409
PROJECT PROJECT CARRY FORWARD
TITLE NUMBER REQUESTED TOTAL
Immokalee Government Center 80014 $ 100
Medical Examiner Facility 80112 $ 6,207
Immokalee Health Svs 80177 $ 1.600
Immokalee Jail 80196 $ 201,674
New Maintenance Facility 80515 $ 6,294
TOTAL
$ I00
$ 6,207
$ 1,600
$201.674
$ 6,294
$215,875
GRO'~VTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the BCC approve/authorize the necessary budget amendment to carry forward
FY 1996 unexpended funds into FY 1997 and re-budget 800 MHz project reimbursements for Fund 301.
PREPARED BY: CF~.' f'K(L/A-., DATE:
S~aro9 Newman, Accounting Technician
Office' of Capital Projects Management
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
George parker, Semor ProJect Manager
Offic. e of Capital Pr~ojeets Management
REVIE'~q~D BY. _ DATE:
Adolfo A G lez P E ~ire~r , A_._Gc~lez, P.E.
Offi, cex~jf Capital Pro)ects Management
R~yrnond \¥. Miller, P.E., Interim Administrator
Public Works Dix6sion
q/ ¢ 7
Additlorml Can3. Fomard
FL.'N'D 301 COL.'NTYWIDE CAPITAL PROJECTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1500
60013
80014
80101
80105
80108
80112
80151
80152
80161
8O162
80166
8(} 174
80177
8018o
80196
80197
80503
80504
80505
80506
80508
80515
80518
80519
80525
Imm Jail Laundr)'
Naplesscape 90
ImmoLalee Gox'ernmcnt Cenler
El.tS Station Renovation
lmmokalee EMS Complex
Sheriffs Boot Camp
Medical Examiner
lmmokalcc Sioc 'kade Sexier
Building A Renovations
Reroofing Projects
Nc~ Air Condition
Bldg F Space Reassignment
Gun Range
Immokalec Health Svs
PC & Telephone Modernization
lmmo~lee Jail Renovation
BLDG \V Expansion
Campus Improvements
Em-ironmcntal Impr
Lighting Retrofits
Govcrnmem BIdg Paint
Eleclirc Repairs
Nc,' Cnv, Maim Fac
Expansion Tax Colleclors
Bldg F 4~h & 5th Floor
General Bldg Improvement
development Svs Bldg
Sun'cying Fees
Building Improvements
Building
O~her Contractual Svs
Licenses & Pemms
Communieations Equipment
Elccmcin-
Autos & Trucks
Hca~ .') Equipmenl
Aulos & Trucks
Impro~ emcnts
Sofm a re "' '-
Office Equipment
tAD O)
FY 96 F'Y96 1:5'96
AMENDED ACTUAL ACTUAL INCREASE
FORECAST ENCUMB EXPENSES (DECREASE}
10.000 10.006 (6)
56.()00 26.(IOO 29.150 850
584.900 576.008 8.892
34.300 37.192 (2.892)
3.500 225 3.275
419.500 19.280 93.748 306.472
400.000 42.900 350.893 6.207
137.000 32.451') 100.679 3.871
5.000 5.00o
53.700 53.930 (230)
189.9OO 21.992 205.668 (37.760)
19.700 - 27.266 (7.566)
96.900 - 81.264 15.636
157.45)0 9.591 91.401 56.408
882.4O0 36.447 767.817 78.136
204.600 2.926 201.674
387.00(} 143.965 305.448 (62.413)
2.600 1.750 850
154.(}O(} 14.888 56.81 I 82.301
160.0O0 158.601 !.399
2.900 2.883 17
19.900 - 19.900
85.000 5.148 73.558 6.294
243.600 5.177 231.705 6.718
514.800 6.000 506.967 1.833
17.901 38 ( 17.93%
307.900 112 307.462 326
2.670 2.730 (5.4t)¢))
].300 ].325 (25)
33 (33)
48.300 35.262 13.013 25
310 (3 I¢))
7.200.000 1.363.995 6.366.006 (53().oo1
(175) 175
150.000 148.392 1.608
- 1.6o0 ( 1.60o
18.00o 18.00o
67.90O 66.690 1.2 I0
34.200 34.15O 50
59.31)1) - 55.()0i) 4.3(x)
PROYECT
DESCRIPTION
Tmns 5% Commercial Paper
Transfer t Airport Authorib-
Total
To~l Encumb/Expenses
155.40o ( 16
12.~ 1.817.925 (97.661
155.416
12.990.051
Transfer Propert.x Taxes
Bond,%oan Proceeds
CarD.' Fomard
Transfers
IntcresVGrams
Total
3.149.6OO 3.147. I¢~) { 2.5t n))
9.421.7OO 9.421.700
311.6oO 311.6OO
369.900 709.030 339.130
13.252.8Cg} 13.589.430 336.630
RE\'EN~'E LESS EXPENSES {
LESS F'Y97 BUDGETED CARRY FORWA
385.900 - 599.379 238.969
385.9~)
ADDITION.U.. CARRY FORWARD FU~ 301
213.479
Executive Summaries Processed for thc Follox~ing Projects:
Budgcl Amendment ~12
Budget Amendment ~28
34.170
78. ] OO
[REMAINING FL..,'NDS TO CARRY FOR\VARD
101.209 ]
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO
17,IPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio Governing
Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approve an amendment to a
professional services agreement to provide services related to administering our slate
revo;ving fund loan.
CONSIDERATIONS:
An Amendment for Professional Sec'ices Agreement has been prepared for additional
services consisting of administration of our state revolving fund loan for improvements to
our 8-mgd SCRWWTF. Services to be provided are consistent with our ex/sting March
15, 1994 agreement w/th Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. for professional services
pursuant to RFP 93-212 I.
On October 22, 1996, the Board adopted a resolution approving final application for a
state revolving fund loan in the amount of $14.7 million for Phase I improvements at the
SCRW'WTF.
Administration services are needed to fac/I/tale the loan. Our consultant proposes to use
Angie Brewer & Associates, who specialize in assisting municipalities with funding for
public works programs.
Total consultant fees and expenses associated w/th Amendment No. 5 for administration
and coordination of our state revolving fund loan for the SCRWWTF Phase l
improvemems are %2,308, cost-mt-to-exceed based on time and re/mbursable expenses.
A summarx' of total fees approved and proposed are as follows:
Fees Scope of Services
Ori~nal A~eement
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 3
Amendment No. 4
247,000
322,700
582,000
218,000
2,016,OOO
Amend. No. 5 (proposed) 6~,~08
Preliminary Report, Conditional Use
Design Report, Dis/nfect/on Design
Deep Injection Well
Reuse Master Plan, Lakewood Design
WWTF design, perm/ts, bid and construct
SRF Coordination and Administration
Total 53,448,008
Fees approved for payment to-date total S2,266,389 as of November 1996.
!
-. - -J
Staff has negotiated the proposed scope and compensation as provided in the attached
Amendment No. 5 to Professional Services A~eement. Approval by the Count).'
Attorney's office is necessary prior to signature by the Chairman.
FISCAL D, IPACT:
A budget amendmen! is needed to transfer funds as follows:
Amount:
From:
To:
Con~.ract 2
.562,308
414-263611-763100-73049 - Sewer Flow Monitoring
414.263611-631400.73053 - SCRWWTF Phase I Improvements,
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio
governing board of the Collier County. Water. Sewer District approve and authorize the
Chairman to execute Amendment No. 5 to Professional Services Agreement with Hole,
Montes & Associates, Inc. related to the state revolving fund loan for Phase I
improvements to the SCRWWTF, and a,l~.rove the necessary budget amendment.
/"?.l _ ' ,., '
Tom Sa~/erfi~ld, P.E.,a6roj~ct Manager '
Offic. a-OT Capital Projects Management
REVIE~VED BY: DATE: _!
A , rector
Office of Capital Projects Management
RayMond W. Miller, P.E.
Public Works Division Interim Administrator
DATE:
CC:
Tim Clemons, Wastewater Director
Edward Finn, Operations Director
Karl W. Boyer, P.E., Senior Project Manager
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLA.NT EXPANSION
AblENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement dated March 15, 1994 ('hereinafter
"AGREEMENT") is made and entered into this _ day of ., 1997, by and between the
Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida and Governing Board of thc Collier County Water-Sewer District (hereinafter referred
to as the "OWNEK") and Hole, Montes &. Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, authorized to
do business in the State of Florida whose business address is 715 Tenth Street South, P.O. Box
1586, 'Naples, Florida 33939 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, OWNER and CONSULTANT currently have a valid professional services
agreement for the provision of professional services for the South County Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant Expansion (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"), said services more fully
described in said AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, OWNER and CONSULTANT agree some modifications to the services
being contemplated under said AGREEMENT are necessary; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that he has the expertise and the type of
professional services that will be required for completion of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisions contained
herein, parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE ONE
1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER professional engineering services in all phases of
the project to which this Amendment applies.
1.2 CONSULTANT shall provide professional services in addition to those as outlined in said
AGREEMENT as noted in Schedule A of this Amendment, as attached hereto.
ARTICLE TWO
2.1 OWNER agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for services rendered hereunder as
prescribed in Schedule B, entitled "Basis of Compensation", as outlined in sa~d AGREEMENT
with the modifications to Attachments A and C to said AGREEMENT which are attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
- 1 -
X:\92131\SCOP£\SCOP£.JL,HI
ARTICLE THREE
3.1 The schedule for said Project, shall be as shown in said agreement with modifications as
shown in the revised Schedule C as attached hereto.
ARTICLE FOUR
4.1 All articles of .said AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, and
shall not be modified by this Amendment.
IN ~qTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Professional Services Agreement for professional engineering services for the South County
Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion the day and year first written above.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~ FOR
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL
SUBDMSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING
BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-
SEWER DISTRICT.
By:. By:
Clerk Chairperson
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Assistant County Attorney
Wimess
X:\93t3¢\SCOPE\SCOP£.,~.~
HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: r~ .D., P~.
Ronald E. Ben.son, Jr., Ph
Vice President
(CORPORATE SEAL)
SUPPLEMiENT NO. 5 TO
SCffEDULE A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
HMA FILE NO. 93.134
This serves as a supplement and clarification of Schedule A, Scope of Services as provided in the
Professional Services Agreement dated March 15, 1994.
Th. is project amendment consists of the work that is necessary to assist the County with SKF
Management for the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility.
The scope of services is described as follows:
Additional Services
The following additional services are to be provided under this Amendment according to the
terms outlined in the AGKEEMiEN'I'.
~ - This service includes preparation of the loan agreement, process of
reimbursement requests to the stale, monitoring of the WBF_JMBE requirements, process change
orders with FDEP, meetings with staff, assisu.nce in setting up and maintenance of the
OWNER's files, finance account reconciliation, and provide assistance to stgff with Audits.
x:\g313~\SCOP£'~SCOP£.A~.4
- i -
SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT A
Amendment No. 5
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR BASIC SERVICES
PHASE [I-A WWTP Disinfection System
Current
A.2 Design Report $2,800
A.3 Prelimin~ Design $10,300
A.4 Final Design $3,900
A.5 Bidding Services $1,600
A.6 Contract Administration $9,700
PHASE FI-A Royal Palm Irrigation Pump System
A.2 Design Report $500
A.3 Preliminasy Design $5,600
A.4 Final Design $1,600
A.5 Bidding Services By Owner
A.6 Contract Admi.tfisu-ation By Owner
PHASE II-A WWTP Design
A.2 Design Report
A.3 Preliminary Design
A.4 Final Design
A. 5 Bidding Services
A.5.1 Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
- Equipment
A.5.2 Reclaimed Water PS/Elco Bldg
- Com'm.~ction
A.5.3 Phase I Improvements
A.6 Contract Administration
A.6.1 Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
- Equipment
A.6.2 Reclaimed Water PS/'Elec Bldg
- Construction
A.6.3 Phase I Improvements
- 1 -
X:\93134\SCOP£\SCOP£.,~'~4
$219,000
$750,000
$150,000
$10,000
$15,000
$30,000
$20,000
$120,000
$355,000
Amendment
No. 5
$2,800
$10,300
$3,900
$1,600
$9,700
$500
$5,600
$1,600
By Owner
By Owner
$219,000
$750,000
$150,000
$10,000
$15,000
$30,000
$20,000
$120,000
$355,000
PHASE II-C RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES TO SERVE LAKEWOOD
A.2 Design Report $9,000 $9,000
A.3 Preliminary Design $52,000 $52,000
A.4 Final Design $24,000 $24,000
A.5 Bidding Services 56,000 $6,000
A.6 Contract Administration $38,000 $38,000
PHASE rI-D EFFLUENT STORAGE EXPANSION
A.2 Design Report
A.3 Preliminary Design
A.4 Final Design
A.5 Bidding Services
A.6 Contract Administration
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Dete ~rmlned
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
X:\93134\SCOP£\SCOP£.3,H~
- 2 -
7.
SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT C
Amendment No. 5
CONSULTANT'S ESTIMATE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES
(INCLUDENG DETAILED OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION)
Phase I
Preliminary Services
A. 1.1 Preliminary Engineering Report
A. 1.2 Review of Odor Control
A. 1.3 Review of Effl. Disinfection
A. 1.4 Capacity Analysis Report
A. 1.5 Conditional Use Applic.
A. 16 Odor Control Comminee
Phase I1-A Y$%'TP Disinfection System
A.7 Detailed Obse~'ation
Phase [I-A Royal Palm Irrigation Pump Station
Detailed Obse~'ation
Phase H-A WWTP Design
A.7 Detailed Observation
A.7. I Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
- Construction
A.7.2 Phase 1 h-nprovements
Current
Budget
S 172,000
Incl. Above
Incl. Above
$15,000
$35,000
$35,000
$3,700
By O~'ner
$90,000
$265,000
Amendment
No. 5
$172,000
Incl. Above
Incl. Above
$15,000
$35,000
$35,000
$3,700
By Owner
$90,000
$265,000
- 1
Phase II-B Deep Injection Well
A8 Data Review and System
A.9 Design and Construction Permit Applications
A 9a Add 2nd Deep Well Desi~ & Permitting
A. I0 Well Construction Obse~'ation and Testing
A.I I Report
A. 12 Operating Permit Application
543.000
$90.000
$25.000
$37O.000
536,000
518,000
Phase I']-C Reclaimed Water System Upgrades to Serve Lakewood
$43,000
$90,000
525,000
$370,000
536,000
$18,000
A.13 Detailed Observation $16,000 $16,000
A. 14 Surveying/Easements $22,000 $22,000
A.I 5 Permitting $6,000 $6,000
A. 16 Stamp Assistance $5,000 $5,000
Phase [I-D Effluent Storage Expansion
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
A. 17 Detailed Obse~'ation
A.I 8 Surveying/Easements
A. 19 Permitting
A.20 Startup Assistance
Additional Services
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
Surveying
Perm itting/Approvals
Reuse Master Plan
Reimbursable Expenses
Geotechnical Site Investigation
Progress Photos
Stas'tup Assistance
O&M Manual
Operational Support Semices
Warranty Inspection
FDEP Operation Permit
FDEP SKF Management
$30,000 $30,000
$30,000 $30,000
$75,000 $75,000
$I0,000 $10,000
$2,000 $2,000
$15,000 $15,000
$40,000 $40,000
$50,000 $50,000
$35,000 $35,000
$8,000 $8,000
$I0,000 $10,000
Not Authorized $62,308
- 2
SCHEDULE C
Amendment No. 5
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Preliminary Engineering Report
Conditional Use Application
Capacity Analysis Report
Odor Advisory Panel
WAWI'P Disinfection System
Design Report
Pr¢l~ Design
Final Design
Bid Services
Con_ctrucfcn Contract Admin.
Detailed Observation
Pcrn-d tting/Approval$
Royal Palm Irrigation Pump System
Design Report
Prelimim~ Design
Final Design
Permitting/Approvals
W~q'P Design Report
Preliminary Dr~ Report
Final DT~ Report
Final Report
Reuse
Master Plan
Preliminary Dra~ Report
Final Draft Report
Final Report
Complete
Complete
Complete
On-going
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
complete
Complete
X:~931]~\SCOP£\SCOP£.N'¢¢
- 1 -
Deep Injection Well
Data Review & Design Analysis
Design & Construction Permit Appl.
Well Construction Testing
Reports
Operating Permit Appl.
Reclaimed Water System Upgrades
Design Report
Preliminary Design
Final Design
Bid Services
Construction Contract Admin.
Detailed Observation
Surveying/E~ements
Permit'ting
Startup Assis'm~ce
Effluent Storage Expansion
Design Report
Prelh-ninary Design
FLr~ Design
Bid Services
Construction Contract Admin.
Detailed Observation
Surveying/Easements
Permitting
Startup Assistance
WWTP Design
Preliminary Design
Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Fh'~l Design
Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Surveying
Geotechnical Site Investigation
Complete
Complete
Complete
Ongoing
Ongoing
Complete
Complete
Complete
Begin Al~ter Permits/Approvals
Begin After Permits/Approvals
Begin After Permit.s/Approvals
Complete
Ongoing
Begin After Construction Complete
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
X:\92;3¢\SCOP£\SCOP£.,~%~¢
- 2 -
~p Construction Phase Services
Bid Services
Reclaimed Water PS/Elco Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Construction Contract Administration
Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Detailed Observation
Reclaimed Water PSfElec Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Start'up Assistance
Reclaimed Water PS;F_,Iec Bldg
Phase I Improvements
Complete
Complete
Ongoing during Construction
Ongoing during Construction
Ongoing during Conslruction
Ongoing during Construction
Begin following Substantial Completion
Begin following Substantial Completion
X:\93134kSCOP£~SCOPE.AH.(
o 3 -
/~, ~ )Lq )
I&
,I
Pre~, "','~,~g and #nhanc:n~ ~londa'$ ctuahty of life $~nce 1966
HOLE. MONTES & ASSOCIATES. INC.
ENG~N£ER$ PLANNERS SURVEYORS
RECEIVED
DEC 19 1996
December 19, 1996
OFFICE OF CAP}TAL
PROJECTS MANAG£;V~ENT
Mr. Tom Satterfield
Collier County OCPM
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 33962
Re:
Collier Count>' SRWWT'F Contract 1
FLMA File No. 93.134M
Dear Mr. Sanerfield:
We are submitting a request for an amendment to our contract on the above referenced
project to add the work associated with the State Revolving Fund Loan program
requirements. The amendment shows using Angie Brewer & Associates, Inc. for the bulk
of the work under t?ds requirement.
Work under this amendment will consist of preparation of the loan agreement, process of
reimbursement requests to the state, monitoring of the W'BE/MBE requirements, process
cl',ange orders with FDEP, meetings with staff', assistance in setting up and maintenance
of the files, finance account reconciliation, and provide assistance to staffwith Audits.
We propose to do the work on a Time & Materials basis with the estimate. Our estimate
is as follows:
Preparation of Loan Application (ABA)
SRF Management (ABA)
Total ABA work
5% markup by I-~IA
Total subconsultant work '
$8,250.00
$45.000.00
$53,250.00
$55,912.50
HMA Portion
Coordination meetings
E5 - 18 months x 2 hours/month x $99.00/kr
T3 - 18 months x .5 hours/month x $35.00,'kr
Assist in Audit
E5 - 24 hours x $99.00/N'
T3 - 4 hours x$35.00/N'
HMA Portion Total
$3,564.00
$315.00
$2376.00
5140.00
$6,395.00
Tom Sar~effield
Collier County OCPM
P~E: Collier Count' SR'~,'~'TF Contract 1
HMA File No. 93.134M
November 6, 1996
Page 2
$62.307.50
Total Amendment Amount
Time and Materials Estimate $62,500.00
Please advise if this is acceptable as there are several deadlines that need to be met as part
of the work identified above. We have enclosed copies of ABA's breakdown for your
review. The amount for the SRF management has been reduced from the one given to
you and Ed Finn when we met vdth Angle Brewer. The spreadsheet she had when we
met contained only the rag' labor casts and did not include an5' overhead, labor benefits &
taxes, or the mark'up. If you have any questions, please let me know and we can discuss
them. Also enclosed is a copy of the contract amendment for your review.
VeD' truly yours,
HOLE, MONTES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Harry H. Holloman, P.E.
Director of Projec~ Management/Principal
HHH/nsl
Enclosures
W.~ 19~ 3\93134~.HTO-r,TS61218.DOC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMblENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APPROVE A REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
FLOATING DOCK SYSTE5I TO BE LOCATED AT THE CAXAMBAS
LAUNCH FACILITY.
Objective: To have the Board of Count)' Commissioners approve the funding for the
construction ora floating dock system at the Caxambas Boat Launch Facility.
Considerations: On August 13, 1996, the Board entered into an agreement with the Gulf
Coast Rowing Association, Inc. for the use of the Caxambas Boat Facility for recreational
programs. More specifically, this site would be used for rowing events and instructional
classes which would be open to the general public. In order to facilitate this program,
floating docks would have to be constructed. The cost of this project is $10,000.
Fiscal Impact: Funding in the amount of $10,000 is available from Fund 306, Parks
Construction. Resen'es.
Gro,a'th Management: This project is compatible with Collier County's Comprehensive
Plan under the Recreation and Open Space Element.
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize funds for the
construction of a floating dock to be used at the Caxambas Boat Facility as addressed
within this Summary along with the necessary budget amendments.
Prepared by: . ,c~,.~!. ~' 7.~,~.,,~-- Date:
,.Gary Fr}tnco, Parks Superintendent
Department of Parks and Recreation
Reviewed
by: ~.~"~-)/_ ~ Date:
Skip Camp, Acting Director
Department of Parks and Recreation
Reviewed by:' x~_ 3,_4..~.-? Q~_ ''
Thomas W. Olliff, Adrr[Igl)strator
Division of Public Sen'ices
Date:
Agenda lte~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APPROVE THE BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING CARRY FORWARD
WITHIN FUND 130 GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER.
Objective: To have the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget
amendment to recognize Carry Forward for Fiscal Year 95 / 96 to complete renovations of the
auditorium.
Consideration: The recognition of the Carry Forward within Fund 130 Golden Gate
Community Center will facilitate completion of the auditorium at the Community Center. The
funds will be utilized to complete all necessary electrical needs and handicap accessibility
requirements as well as the additional alternate items listed in the architectural plans.
The Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board unanimously recommends to the Board
that Carry Forward within Fund 130 Golden Gate Community Center be utilized to complete the
renovations.
Completing the room in one phase is more convenient to the public since it would eliminate
closing the auditorium for purposes of further renovations.
Fiscal lmpact: Carry Forward of $65,234 will be placed in Capital Building
Improvements.
Growth Management: None
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Budget
Amendment recognizing Carry Forward in Fund 130 Golden Gate Community Center.
Prepared by:
,~'~w,~ '-'~&',,'~,~6, ~ Date:
Jo~q Dunnuck, Community Center Supervisor
De~ment o$~'arks and Recreation
Reviewed b~~~~---~'~'~ Date:
Steve PelTers, Recreation Supervisor
Department of Parks and Recreation
Reviewed by: ~ Date:
S~p Camp, Acting Director
Department of Parks and Recreation
Reviewed by:' \.~:~'~(~ Date:
Thomas W. Olliff, Adrr~trator
Division of Public Services
JAN 2 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TIIAT TH'E BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS CONFIRM THE SELECTION OF DR. CItARLES
KONIGSBERG AS THE NEW COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
OBJECTIVE: To provide County Commission confirmation of the new Director of
Public Health.
CONSIDERATIONS: Following the resignation of Dr. Polkowski, advertisements were
run for the position of Director of the County's Public Health Director's position. A
committee was impaneled that included Ms. Martha Skinner representing the County that
interviewed the candidates. From that process Dr. Charles Konigsberg was unanimously
voted to be recommended to fill the position. Dr. Konigsberg has since worked out
details with the State Department of Health, met with the local medical society, local
leaders, and has agreed to accept the position. The County Commission, according to the
contract between the County and the State, needs to confirm the appointment. A copy of
Dr. Konigsberg's resume is attached as well as a copy of Ns acceptance letter and a letter
from Dr. Richard Hunter, the Deputy State Health Officer recommending that the County
Commission consider Iris acceptance.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, confirm the appointment of Dr. Charles Konigsberg as the new
Director of the Collier County Public Health Department.
Prepared by: '-~t ~,_~~
Tho~i;-~7Olli~,'~- Services Administrator
JAN 2 8 1997
m PAGE 1 OF ¢' I
CURRICULUM VITAE
Charles Konlgsberg, Jr., M.D., M.P.H.
HOME: 18 Emerson Drive OFFICE:
Dover, Delnware 19901
PHONE #: (3..02)697-2560 PHONE #:
INTERNET: fhdb05a@prodigy.com INTERNET:
P.O. Box 637
Dover, DE 19903
(302)739-47OO
ckonigsberg@state.de.us
Director, Division of Public Health, Delaware Department of Health and Social
Services, Dover, Delaware - (October 1991-Present):
Respons!ble for the direction and adm{nistraUon of public health programs for tho State of
Delaware. These programs Include statewlde admlnlstratlon of maternal and child health,
disease control, Ilcensure and cedlficatlon, and provlslon of long term care in state
institutions. In addilion, responsibi[ilies include Ihe direct provision of local public heallh
services In the three counties.
Division has approximately 1500 employees wilh n $85 million budget. Emphasis placed on
moving public health in Delaware toward a new paradigm, wilh more involvement in
assessment, policy development and assurance. New initiatives have included primary
care cooperative agreement, Healthy Delaware 2000, statewlde AIDS/HIV planning and
child health planning. Strong leadership provided for Improving the emergency medical
system for Delaware. The Division has been responsible for implementing major new
initiatives for the Governor, including comprehensive school based health centers and
adolescenl pregnancy prevention.
Director, Dlvlslon of Health, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka,
Kansas - (October 1988-August 1991):
Responsible for the administration and d~rectlon of public health programs on a statewide
basis, including disease control, maternal and child health, environmental health services,
adult and child care facility licensing and local health services.
Re-established visibility and leadership of Division al Health office. Leadership rotes and
special emphasis during my l~nure included developing n strong departmental presence in
rural health development, primary care access and improvement of the local public ~;."2: .
delivery system. I co-chaired the Kansas public health system as a response to the ln~titule~o~e._~_~
ol.eOlctne's report. ~f Public Hi)alU3. Dudng mytenure, the Bivislon oftea~NTB'~q;?
L
implemented an Office of Rural Health. a cooperative agreement with the Deparlment of
Healtt~ end Human Services for primary care, drafled basic standards for local health
departments and other community based clinics. The departmenl assumed leadership in
AIDS with a special I'ocus on coalition building. The Division was responsible for securing
funding and implementing a health assessment for residents living near an old lead and
cadmium mine site, marking the departmenrs first spectre activities in environmental risk
assessment.
District Health Program Supervlsor/Broward County Public Health Unit Director,
Department of Health and Rehabllltatlve Services, District Ten, Fort Lauderdalo,
Florida - (~'eptember 1984-October 1.cJa$)t
Overall responsibility f~ direclJon of Ihe Broward County Public health Unit and for the
Distdct Health Program Ofl~ce. The Health Unit .carves a population of 1,100,000 and
2,000,000 visitors through a comprehensive public health program.
The Health Unil, during my tenure, expanded its..ro[(~s ir~ Ihe community by taking lhe lead
role in securing and implementin9 a $1,400,000 a year granl from the State of Florida for
primary care and continuing the developmenlal phases of a computer network linking
primary care providers.
The Health Unit provided leadership regarding the AIDS crisis by means of a community
task force, testing sites, education and ant.ring into a cooperative venlure with Jackson
Memodal Hospital in Miami to develop a comprehensive AIDS Clinic. These eft'ods were
Instrumental in securing a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant to (~evelop the clinic,
Director and Health Offlcor, MemphlslShelby County Health Department, Memphis,
Tennessee - (April 1980-September 1984):
Directed comprehenslve urban (pop. 800,000) health department with 600 employees and
$16,000,000 budget (1984). This experience included responsibility for an integrated
primar7 care and preventive health services program and for a wide range of environmental
health programs, Including pollution control.
The department was reorganized, streamlined administratively and new key staff recruiled
and retained. New initiatives during my tenure included development of a health promotion
program, expanded efforts in prenatal care, modernized food inspection code. personal
care home ordinance, loxic waste studies involving both the environment and humans, and
a new medical records system.
The department created a planning function and was active in developing internal plans and
as an advocate for a planned system of' indigent health care.
I was promoted to the position of Director of' the Division of Health by tl~e Shelby County
Mayor in 1981, but retained my functions as Director o1' the Health Depadment. I was also "
appointed by the Commissioner of' thn Tennessee Deparlment of Public Health (now
Tennessee Depadment of Health} as Direclor for thc State's regionalized public health
programs, including ~ippled children's seP,'lces. ~
I JAN28 997
DlSTSPersonnel Fa: : 813-3~:-1,17,) Dec 12 09:07
District Health Officer, West Alabama District Hualth Department, Tu$caloosa,
Alabama o (January 1974- April 1980):
Directed organizational and implementation plaasus at development of district health
deparlment which merged five single couhty I~ealth departments into a district linking urban
Tuscaloosa Couhty with four adJacenl rural counties (total population approximately
175,000). ..
District made major advances in public health includin0 recruitment of lop administrative
and professional staff, institution of administrative and financial controls, and inservice
educatior:. Obtained over $3,600.000 in grant [unds over a five year span.
Dlstdct assumed responsibility for regional family planning project and Implemented regional
projects including WIC, dental health, home hoallh 3nd health education. Substantial
commitment In d.ealing with in[ant modal[fy through Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project.
Participated wttli medical school projecl to establish rural pdmary care center. Other
projects included implementation of food establishment grading system, rodent control,
inservice training course for environmental[sis, lead poisoning screening effod, and
Immunization initiatives. New health center constructed in Tuscaloosa.
Deputy Director, North Central Health District, Macon, Georgia -
(August 1971-January 1974):
Assisted Director in administrative and clinical respnnsibility for comprehensNe public health
programs, Including mental health, in a foudeen county urban-rural area (population
330,000).
General Medical Officer (Captain), United States Air Force, Kirfland Air Force Base,
Albuquerque, N.M.- (September 1957-September 196g):
General medical practice experience (out-patient). Served as Chief of Dispensa~ Services
under Director of Base Medical Services.
Staff Physician, Veteran's Administration, Knoxville, Tennessee -
(A. pril lg$7 - August 1967):
General practice (outpatient).
Staff physician, Eastern State Hospital, Knoxvllle, Tennessee -
(January 1966-March 19~6):
General Practice.
Agenda
#o. /ir. ~'~
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg. ~ _
CE.'
1992-Present:
1989-1991:
1986-1988:
1980-~984:
1982:
1975-1980:
Course coordinator and I~clurer for the public heallh portion
of the University of Delaware/Jefferson Medical College
Medical Scholars Prog. ram.
AdjunCt Associale Professor, School of Preventive Medicine,
Departrr~nt of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center,
Kansas City, Kansas.
Clinical Professor, Department o! Epidemiolocjy and Public
Hearth, Universily at' Miami.
Assistant Professor in Communily Medicine, University of
Tennessee Center for tho Health Sciences, Memphis,
Tennessee.
Co-taught Health and Social Policy course in Department of
Political Science, Memphis Slate University, Memphis.
Tennessee.
Assistant, Associate Professor in Community Medicine,
University of Alabama.
B.A. (Psychology). 1962, Vanderbilt University.
M.D. - 1965. Unlv6rslty of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences.
Master of Public Health (Community Health Administration}- 1971, University of
Norlh Carotina School of Public Health.
Internship (Rotating) - 1966-67, University of Tennessee Memorial Research Center
and Hospital, Knoxvirle, Tennessee.
Realdency in Public health and Preventive Medlclne. 1969-1972, Georgia
Department of Public Health.
· Ce~fied, 1975, the American Board of Preventive Medicine (Public Health).
· Delaware Institute of Medical Education and Research (DIMER)
lg96 - Board of Directors
· Delaware Health Information Network
1996 - Charter member of Board o! Direclor.,;
· Delaware PerinatalBoard
1995 - Appoinled by Governor Tom Carper
· Delaware Interagency Coordlnatlng Council (IDEA) 1994 -
Executive Committee. 1996 -
· Association of State and Terrltorlal Health Officials (ASTHO)
Environment Committee - chair- 1995-pre.~¢nt
Agen.d~ J ~e~m_~ll
JAN 2 8 1997
· Broward County (Florida) Envlronmentel Qual;ty Control Board (Pollullon
Control Agency) - 1985-88.
· Elderly Interest Fund · Broward County, Florlda (Board of Directors) -
1986-88.
· Council of Executive Directors (Broward County, Florida) - 1987-88.
· National A~sociatlon of Counties (NACO)
Health and Education Steering Committee - 1982-88
AIDS Task Force - 1988
· National Association of County Health Officials {NACHO)
Board of Direclors - 1984-88
Vice'President- 198B
· United States Conference of Local Health Officials (Affiliated with U.S.
Cnnference of Mayors)
Board of Trustees - 1982-88
Vice President- 1986-87
· Florida Asaociation of County Health Officials
President- 1987-88
· Southern HealthAsaoc[ation
Governing Council - 1980-82 & 1985-88
· Florida Public Health Association Board - i985-8G
Chairman Public Health Physicians Sec[ion. 1985-88
· Les Passes Rehabilitative Center, Memphis, Tennessee
Board of Directors - 1980-84
· Southeastern Regional Council on Development of Nurse Midwifery.,
1978-80
· Alabama Public Health Association
President - 1979
· West Tuscaloosa Community Health Center
Board of Directors - 1977-80
· Mental Health Board(Advisory) of Tuscaloosa, Bibb and Pickens County,
Alabama - 1977-78
· Alumni Association, Univemlty of North Carolina, School of Public Health
Board of D[rectors- 1979
pROFESSIONAL ASSOC~
· American College of Preventive Medicine, Fellow - 1975-Present.
Board of Regents, Region VII - 1989 - 1992
Public Health Regent - 1992 - 1996
· Delaware Medical Society
House of Delegates 1994, 1995
· Kent County Medical Society
· American Public Health Association
· Health Reeources Council - Member of tho Board
(Delaware} - 1994-
· Delaware Health Care Commission
Primary Care Committee. 1995-pre.,;ent
· Broward Regional Health Planning Council
Primary Care Committee - (1985-88)
Medical Facilities Committee. (1985.88)
· Memph, ls Jobs Conference
Health Committee, Regional Health Planning Subcommittee - (1983-84)
Biomedical Research Zone Commitlee. (1983-84)
· Mid-South Medical Center Council (Health Systems Agency),1980-83,
(Voluntary Health Planning Agency}, 19~3-84 - Memphis, Tennessee.
Executive Committee- (1980-83)
Vice President- (1983)
· West Alabama Health Council (Health Systems Agency, Tuscaloosa, Alabama)
Member of Board and Executive Committee - 1974-80.
· National Commie,,fen on Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome - 1989-1993
Appointment by Senate Minodty Leader Robert Dole of Kansas. I was nominated
by the Nalional Association of Counties (NACO). I served four full years as an
active commissioner.
· Kansas Public Health Systems Study Committee - Co-chair - 1990-91.
· Conaultant to HHS/HRSA on Public Health Practice - 1991-92.
· Contributor to report by the MUbank Memorial Fund, Hard Choices In Hard Tirn~,
~~~- May, 1991.
· The E.A.C.H. Concept: A Study of Rural Health i~livery Options (Kansas).
1990. Technical Advisory Group Member.
· Centers for Disease Control - 1986-87.
Scienlific Advisory Commitlee, Hollywood Dump (Memphis, Tennessee) Human
Health Effects Study.
'· U.S. Public Health Service - June, 1986.
Consultant on Development of Public Health Service Ptan for Prevention and
Control of AIDS and the AIDS Virus (Coollonl Planning Conference) - was
one of the two local health officials invited to this conference.
· Center~ for Disease Control-AIDS
1985-86 - Consultant on development of various public hoallh guidelines,
· Governor's (Florida) AIDS Advisory Task Force - 1985-87
· Memphis Health Care Coalition. 1982-84 .
Business and Industry Health Promolion Conference. April, 1983
(Conference Chairman).
u[bl~Yer;onnel ~ax : 8tS-33".-:-~47,j' Dec 12 09:07
· Public Health Leadership Institute - Sponsored by the Centers for Disease Conlrol-
Class of 1992-93.
· Leader~hip Memphis, Class of 1982 - Select group of community leaders, one ye;,r in
depth orientation to the community.
· Memphis Jobs Conference- 1983-84.
· Colonial Rotary Club (Dover, DE)- 19c.'.'J4-.
· Rotary Club of Fort Lauderdale- 1985-[38.
· Memphl,s Rotary Club- 1982-84.
· Tu$caloosa Rotary Club- 1974-80.
· Guy M. Tale Award - 1977, Alabama Public Heallh A~socialion, 'For outstanding
service to'lha people of Alabama Ihrough promotion and protection of the public's
health.'
· Honored by Harvest America - Kan:.as City, Kansas at its 10th Anniversary
celebration, June, 1991, for my work with AIDS.
· Health Policy Award - Mid Atlantic Association gl Primary Care Centers, January.
1993.
· Recognized by Delaware Chapter of the American College of Emergency
Physicians - October, 1995, for e[Iorls in supporting the development and
improvement of emergency health systems.
· Honr.,rery Commander of 436th Aerospace Medicine Squadron, Dover AFB
November 1995-May 1990
Applegate, W.B., Runyan, J.W., Brasfield, L., Wllllams, M.L., Konlgsberg, C. Fouche, C.,
"Analysis of the 1980 Heal Wave in Memphis,'
~ (Aug. 1981, Vol. 29, No. 8).
Konigsberg, C., Taft, H.G., "Public Health - A Community Responsibility, 'Medidne, The
Community and Health, Charles B. Slack Company (1982).
Packer, H., Glassco, S. Konlgsberg, C., "Prostitution m Memphis: Then and Now,'
~(Feb, 1983, Vol, 76, No.2).
Tacket, Carol O., Naraln, Jal P., Sattin, Richard, Lofgren, John P. Konigsberg, C., Rendtorff,
Robert C. Rausa, Alfio, Davis, Betty R., Cohen, Milchell L., "A Multistate Outbreak of
Infections Caused by Yersinia Enterocolilica Transmitted by Pasteurized Milk,
of the American Medlc,.aJ_A~oc[a.[[oA (Jan. 1984, Vol. 251, No. 4).
Konigsberg, C., Smartt, M.M., 'Momphls: Tho Status o1' Public Health Issues and
Programs," .~ (June 1984, Vol. 13, No. 5.
Konlgsberg, C. Barrera, M.: "A Local Pubhc Health Perspective on the ~,cqulred Immune
Deficiency Syndrome," Nova Unlversl~_Law Royle~..(VoI. 12, No. 3, Spring 1988).
Lowry, P.W., Levlne. R., Stroup, D.F., Cunn. R.A., Wilder, M.H., Konlgsborg, C., 'HepaUbs
A Outbreak on a Floating Restaurant in Flonda, lYOG," A.M..J,...F~ldcmLoJogy (Vol. 129,
No. 1, January 1989).
Agenda
JAN 2 8 1997
DIST~ersonnel Fax : ~,13-~3~-L~70 Dec ~g Og:07
Konigsberg, C., "The Broward Network for Comprehensive Care for AIDS: A Public health
Response," , ' O.C. Ia.t.[.~ (Vol. 76, No. 4, April 198~J).
Konlgsberg, C., 'AIDS and HIV: A National and S~ale Perspective," J~3.J:t~l~.J~r.,l.qe (Vol.
91, No. 3, March lggo).
Konigsberg, C., 'Is Providing Health Care A Social Obligation?', ~CS
(Vol. 7, Nos, 2 and 3, Spring/Summer 1(391.
July, 1996
JAN q97
Pg, "~ __
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE EN FIEALTFI CARE POLICY DEVELOPM2ENT
AND LEGISLATIVE MATTERS
As a local and state public health official, [ have always been involved in not only
traditional public health policy development, but in various aspects of health care and
environmental health. This experience has been varied and broad based over the yearn.
Examples of health care policy activities include:
I0 years of'service on the boards of local and regional health planning agencies in
/.,labama and Memphis. Especially in West Alabama, I played a major role with the
Health Systems Agency on issues of health care for the urban and rural underserved.
I was asked in 1980 to chair ',.he HSA in West Alabama bm declined since I was
leaving for Memphis. Aa a member of the board of'the Health Resources Board in
Delaware, I worked to broaden its focus fi.om traditional regulatory approaches m
Certificate of Need.
[ have had a long standing interest and involvement in improving health care access
to the underserved. In some cases, such as moving the Broward County Public
Health Unit toward the direct provision of primary care, the involvement was quite
direct. In other cases, especially in more recent years, I have felt that I could
accomplish more by advocacy, educating policy makers about primary care and
developing partnerships to improve access. I have looked for opport~ities to bring
traditional yet categorical public health programs into the primary care model. It is
clear that the penetration of widely accepted clinical preventive services cannot be
expected without assuring that all have access to primary care.
In the mid 1970's, I participated on the Southeastern Regional Council on the
Development of'Nurse Midwifery. 1' did this in the beliefthat innovations in health
care delivery were necessary if women in the rural areas of West Alabama were to
have a full range of maternity care. At the time, infant mortality rates in that area
were among the highest in the nation.
1 made the major management decisions after much thought to move the service
delivery of public health in Delaware into the managed care arena. Contracts with
all four managed care companies who have contracts for Medicaid in Delaware have
been developed and signed. A preventive and early engagement model has been used
bringing the strengths of'public health together with the private primary care system.
I served on the House of Delegates ofthe Delaware Medical Society's annual
meetings for two years. The reference committees of the House are a major
component of policy development for the Society. I have always been an active
member of my local or state medical societies. [ also was the lone Delaware
participant in the March, 1996 Medicine/public Health Initiative. I see major
opportunities stemming from that ctTort to at long la. st bring medicine, public health,
medical schools and schools of'public heaIth together.
[ spent the better part of my time as the Director of Public Health in Kansas working
on health care access, especially rural health. During my tenure, the Office of Rural
Health attracted considerable support in the Legislature and in the commtmities. I
was involved with the EACH/PCH rural hospital restructure efforts which brought
several millions of dollars to rural Kansas.
I was a member of the retreat and a consultant to the Milbank Memorial Fund as it
developed its monograph Hard hoie in Times.
I have had ex~ertsive involvement in the HIV/AIDS issue rangS~g far beyond the
traditional public health disease control model. While in Broveard County, Florida, [
took the lead in developing a truly comprehensive health and social service model for
those living with AIDS. [ served on Florida Governor Bob Crraham's AIDS Task
Force. I.n recognition of my leadership, the National Association of Counfies
nominated me for a seat on the National Commission on A.[DS in spite ofthe fact that
I had left county service for my statewide post in Kansas. Appointed by Senator
Robert Dole, [ was an active member of the Commission for four years. The
experiences were varied and exposed me to issues in our communities that left
profound impressions on me. in addition, during the 1980's, the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) frequently called upon me for advice on policy development. I was
one of only two state and local health officials invited to the well known "Coolfont
Conference" in 1986 which laid out the basic blueprint for the Public Health Service
approach to AIDS.
I have also had experience in environmental policy development in addition to the
traditional public health regulatory activities. I assisted the CDC in their work on the
Hollywood Dump in l~emphis after [ left the city. I had a rather unique experience in
Broward County, Florida in serving as a boa.rd member of the County's
environmental control board. It gave me a chance to be involved in the actual
development of environmental policy as opposed to being the bureaucrat. While in
Delaw'a.re, I' pushed for and supported successful efforts for public health fi. drilling its
roles in environmental risk assessment.
As a state health official, I hav~ had fairly extensive experience in the legislative
process. As time progressed in my tenure in Delaware, I was m.t~ed more and more
to represent the department in maners before the General Assembly. I presented and
defended the division's budget for five years. I was particularly instrumental on
behalf of state government during 1996 in gaining support for legislation on smoking
and youth and i.n trauma systems development. Both bills passed and were signed by
the Governor, but not before considerable effort was expended to gain support among
various interest groups and make the inevitable compromises that go into any piec_e of
legislation. Through these and other matters, [ have learned how things get done in
1'-
2 ~ .lAN 281.qg7
the legislative a:cna. In ad~tio~, I rcgulaHy vis[ted the Delaware Congrc:ssion~
delegation each year and wM in contact with the(r staffs as specific issues arose. My
service on the l~a~onal CommL~ion on A.[DS brought me into contact with various
members of'Congress as well as one meeting with President Bush.
Charles Koriigsberg, J'r., M.D, M.P.H.
September, 1996
3
JAN2B1997
I~nusry ~1.1997
Tabu Ol]iff
3341 Tsrnismi Tr~ l{~
N~le~ FL. ~4112
IX~ion of~, Cc
· ,g~ry of $II0,000. W
Dr. Ko~.~'s ~
ROH/mk
Dr. C:l~a.flcs Koriiml
Dr. ~ Howdl,
of'O~, ~ o
KOr~IGSBERG Fax : ~J32-697-~0! ]an 21 16:~
I~ Emerson Drive
Dover, DE 19901
,l~u~y 20, 1997
R/cl'tm'd O. Hunter, Ph.D
Deputy State Health Officer
Florida Dep(trtment of He*lth
1317 Win~wood Blvd
Tallahasse~, FL 32399-0700
Dear Dr. Hunter:
It is with pleasure that ! aeceFt your offer of appointment a.(; Director of the Collier
County HcaJth Department, as oullined in ),our letter of December, 17, 1996. I
understand teat th. is appointment i$ subject to approval by the Collier County Board of'
Commissioners. I have indicat~I verbally to the Colher County Mam~ger, Nell Dorrill,
that ! wish to proceed with this appointment It is my intention lo report to work on
January 31, 1997
I am excited about this pos/t/on, and look forw'm'd to rejoining thc FIor/~ public health
Sincerely,
cc: James T. Howell, M.D., M.P.It., Secretary
JAN 2 8 1. 97
18 Emerson Drive
D~vcr, DE 19901
January 21, 1997
Collier County Baud of Comrnsssioners
Administration Building
33C 1 E Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 341 ! 2
Dear Commissioncrs:
This letter is to indicate tMt I have sccepted lhe Florida Department ofltcalth's offer of
al::,poinlment lo the position ofDireclor oflhe Collier County Health Department, subjcc!
to your ap~oval I have previously so indicated verbally on January 17, 1997 and in
wntmg on January 20, 1997 Io Dr. Richard Hunter, Deputy State Heallh Officer and
verbally on January 17 to County Mana~r Nell Dorrill. I would respeclfully request
your concurrence with th~s al:T~ointment. I am anxious to begin my duties, hopefully on
Jnnuary 31, 1997
I m'n looking forwsrd to your favor~le consideration of this appointment and ~rn exciled
abvut servmg the cit/zens o£Collier County.
Sincerely, J / ,
Charlds~oni~berg, gr., M~, MPFI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE A
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND
ROGER CARVALLO CONCERNING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OFFICE SPACE.
~: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve a First
Amendment to Lease Agreement between Collier County and Roger Carvallo concerning the Finance
Department Office Space.
~: On November 12, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Lease
Agreement with Roger Carvallo for additional office space at Court Plaza III (lst Floor) which is the
location of the Finance Department. The current rental rate is Thirteen Dollars ($13.00) per square
foot. Mr. Carvallo originally proposed a price of Thirteen Dollars and 99/100 Cents ($13.99) per
square foot.
Mr. Carvallo agreed to reduce the 1't Floor rent as mentioned above only if the rent for the 2~ Floor
office (Agreement approved October 25, 1994) was increased fi.om Twelve Dollars and 84/100 Cents
(S 12.84) to Thirteen Do llars and No/100 Cents ($13.00) per square foot.
Considering both rental rates, the total savings to Collier County for the frrst year is Three Hundred
Thirty-Nine Dollars and 45/100 Cents ($339.45). Not taking into consideration annual increases
stipulated in the Lease Agreement, by approving the attached Amendment, the cost savings over the
life of the two (2) Leases shall be approximately One Thousand Eighteen Dollars and 35/100 Cents
($1,018.35).
Since the amended rent is effective as of December 1, 1996, the rental amount for the next rental
payment due shall be adjusted to reflect the decrease in rent for the previous months affected by this
Amendment.
The Amendment also includes a three (3) year renewal term. The amended term now reflects the
Lease term for the additional office space on the first floor which shall expire in November, 2000.
Both Leases still contain a termination cl.ause for Collier County to terminate the Lease, with or
without cause, by providing the Landlord with a thirty (30) day written notice.
This First Amendment to Lease Agreement has been reviewed by the Clerk of Courts and the Office of
the County Attorney.
~: The amended rent for the 2"d Floor office space shall be Sixty-Six Thousand
Three Hundred Dollars and No/100 Cents (S66,300.00) for the first year and any increases in the rent
as stipulated in the Lease Agreement shall be withdrawn from account number 001-041010.
W N ' : None ]~
p. ECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the First Amendment to
Lease Agreement with Roger Carvallo for office space at Courl Plaza III and authorize its Chairman to
execute same.
PREPARED
Michael H. Dowhng, Real Prop~,~ Sp~ia~st
:d .""~577C__ _- .. -,,- *;,.c~ -..
DATE:., ·
Ja~s Mitchell, Director, Finance Department
Leo E Ochs, Jr., Ad'minisTor, Public
DATE:
Services Division
DATE:
JAN 2 8 1997
~.~ -
l.casc ~;$ l
FIRST AM~N~,",~NT TO LEASE AGREE%lENT
THIS FIRST A.'",.'~,"','"DS~,',,'T TO LE./,SE AGR.EEMEXT entered into this ..~: da> of ~.~.~.
199.7_. at Naples. CoJher Counly. Florida by lad belwcen Ro~er Cars. alto u, hose m;,.,lmg a~dte~'~l.~T:~t~ ~1
Es:i~,c. PO Box ??14. Naples, Florida 34102, hereinafter refcrre~ lO as "LESSOR". a":~ Co::~cr C'oun:v. a
polmcal subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing ad~ress ts 3301 East Tarr4am~ I ra:L Ne;re>. Fio~-ida
34112, hereinafter referred 1o as "LESSEE".
WITNESSETH
~,3-~RE. AS, thc LESSEE and LESSOR have previously enlered into a Lease Agreement de:c~ October
1994.
thc LESSEE and LESSOR .,re desirous or amend;ag thc Lz~sc Agreement. and
NOW TF[ER.EFORE, in consideration of the covenants an~ agreements prov)ded hemr, and ,.,::bm the said
Lease and Ten Do:lets ($10 00) and other valuable consideration. Iht said Lca~' AFreement ~,. hereb) ~.mended
as follows
Thc following is added to Article 2 of the Lease Asrecmcn:
If this Lease is not terminated or expired by Nov¢,,mher 30, 109';. th;s Lease ,~ ')
,.a,, autom~:ica:ly renew for
three (3) additional terms of three (3) years each
2 The following shall be added to Amclc 3 as follows
Commencing on December I, 1996. LESSEE hcrcb',, cnvcn,',n;s and corec,, t: ?,..,, as rent for thc
D.-'m:s:~ Premises thc sum ofSixJ).six Thous:'r,d Three ! ....... ¢., Peri:rs ;.,",~ Cr;.. :r,'3 Ce"',:~ (Sb~.30~' CO) per
annum in equal monthly Instal!meals of Five Thousand Fi',e Hundred T~,.cnb.fi',c D,~II,~r.~ and r:O.'lr,0 Cents
($S.S25 00) each hereinafter referred to as "Revised Rent"
3 Except as expressly provided herein, this Lease At, recreant between Rocor Ca,"vallo and Collier Courtly
for utilization of'thc premises described in said Lease A_qre~cmcn! remains in full ~orce and c,n',cct according lo the
~crms and conditions contained thereto
IN WITNESS LLq-t"EREOF, the LESSEE and LESSOR ha~e hcre:c executed :h:s Firs: Amendment
to Lease Agreement thc day and year first above written
AS TO THE LESSOR
DATED~ ,,~-, ~ "~
Witness (signature)
(print name)
Wimcss (signature)_
(pnnt name)
JAN 28 1997 I
AS TO TT~ LESSEE
DATED:
ATTEST:
D~qGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
BY
, Depuly Clerk
BOARD OF COL.~TY COMMISSIOXERS.
COLLIER COL.~TY, FLORIDA
BY:
Timothy L. Hancock .Chairman
Approved ~s to form Jnd
legal su~ciency:
Hcidi F. Ashton
Assistanl County Attorney
~. //?1..)~ J
JAN 2.~ 1997I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO DECLARE COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY AS
SURPLUS AND ACCEPT THE OFFERS RECEIVED FOR THE SALE OF
SURPLUS TERMINALS, KEYBOARDS AND MICROFILM EQUIPMENT
UNDER BID # S96-2627.
OBJECTIVE: To authorize the sale of surplus terminals, keyboards and various microfilm
equipment to the highest bidder responding to Surplus Bid #S96-2627.
DESCRIPTION: When the Of]See of Information Technology department was developed, a
modernizat!on program for all county departments was initiated. As acquisition of new
microcomputer equipment occurs, the DEC dumb terminals and keyboards are being
replaced. Various surplus micro6lm equipment was received by the Purchasing Department
and was also included in the surplus sealed bid. Pursuant to Chapter 274, F.S. the surplus
equipment has been offered to other government entities and to 15 computer-related firms
(computer wholesalers, resellers, and remanufacturers). Sealed bids were opened on January
10, 1997, with two offers from computer-related firms being received. Staff has reviewed the
bids received and recommends acceptance as follows:
~QMPUTER RESOURCES DRNJ GROUP. INC~
Lot # 2 $151.00 Lot #1 $130.00
Lot # 3 151.00 Lot #5 15.00
Lot # 4 5.00 Lot #6 140.00
Lot # 8 5.00 Lot #7 55.0Q
Lot # 9 15.00 TOTAL $~40.00
Lot #10 15.00
TOTAL $ 342,OO
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues in the amount of $682.00 shall be recognized in the General
Fund.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the sale and
disposal of surplus Bid #S96-2627 to Computer Resources Umlirnited and DRNJ Group, Inc.
in the order and amounts as shown above.
SUBMITTED BY:
REV'IEWED BY:
APPROV'ED BY:
ura Celedorda, Buyer II, Purchasj~u/¥3epartme
Steve C~eH, C~, Purchasing/G~n. Se~ces D~ectur
~o E. Ochs, Support SemSces Di~sion Administrato~
Date
Date
Date
TABULATION FOR BID #S96-2627
"Surplus Terminals. Keyboards & MicrofiLm Equipmcnl"
I'N'VITAT1ONS SENT TO: 24 Vendors
POSTING DATE: December 23.1996
OPENING DATE: January 10. 1997
VENDOR NAME
'Price offered for Lot *ti
Price offered for Lot #2
~rice offered for Lot #3
:~rice offered for Lot #4
Price offered for Lot e5
Price offered for Lot ,6
Price offered for Lot ~7
Price offered for Lot
Price offered for Lot ,9
Price offered for Lot #10
WITNESS:
Claire Oss. Purchasing Tec~ician
"No Bids" received from:
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg. ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH PCA SOLUTIONS, INC.
TO PROVIDE RUNOUT GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES.
OBJECTIVE: To seek approv~ from the Board of Commissioners of a contract amendment with PCA
Solutions, Inc. for runout group health insurance claims ~justing services.
CONSIDERATIQN$: In November, 1996, the Board of Commissioner~ approved First Health, lnc. as its
group health claims adjuring company. The City of Naple~ and the Collier County School Board also plae.~t
their adjus~g services with First Health as pan of a joint project This service began on January l, 1997. Ali
claims inc'~rred on or aRer January l, 1997 will be handled by First Health, Inc.
An issue arose regarding claims which were incurred prior to January 1, 1997 but which may not be presented
for adju~in$ until after such tLme. These claims are commorfly referred to as "runout" claims. Typically, the
new adjusting company will take over these runout claims. Staffnegofiated with First Health to provide this
service, however, First Health did not w~sh to provide this ~ervice given their inability to direct resources to
handling such runout claims for the County, City and School Board on such short notice. Their concern was
that they would not be able to aclequately p~rform the service. Further, they were concerned about the transfer
of ~ta from the previous claims administrator, PCA Solutions, Inc., which would be critical in knowing if
deductibles had been met.
As a result, staff negotiated an agreement with PCA Solutions to handle runou! claims administration. It is
presented in the form of an amendment to PCA Solution's original contract with Collier County. The contract
amendment calls for PCA Solutions to provide claims adjusting services for a three month period oftime. It
gives discretion to the Risk Management Director to extend the amendment until May 31, 1997 if it is
de~ermined that outstanding claims remain as of March 31, 1997. Any extension beyond May 31, 1997
requires that the agreement be brought back to the Board. The management of these claims by PCA Solutions,
lnc. will also result in a smoother transition o£services.
Collier County will be cl'mrged a fee of $15 per employee per month for this service. If the amendment is
extended beyond March 31, 1997, the County may select a fee of $15 per employee per month or $15 per claim
adjusted. The attached contract amendment has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office and it is
recommended for approval.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT;.. None.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this sen'ice ,,,,.ill be $61,110 for the contract period based upon 1,358
employees. Funds are budgeted under Fund 51-7.121640-631153 for this sen'ice.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of commissioners approve the attached contract
amendment g.ith PCA Solutions, Inc. for runout claims administration service.
PREPARED BY: Q-_/~
~eff%(/alker, A~, ~sk M~gement Dir~tor
~VIE~D BY: - ~-i~ ~.~' .~~ DATE:
~ E. Ochs, Jr., Suppo~ S~/4~s A&inistrator
JAN 2 19971
AMENrDN~ENT TO CLAIMS ADMYN'ISTRATION CONTRACT
BETWEEN
COLLLER COUNTY BOARD OF COM2~fISSIONERS
PCA SOLUTIONS, INC.
This AMENDME~ TO CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT effective
January 1, 1997 is entered into this day ofm~, 199___, by and
between Collier County Board of Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (the "County")
and PCA Solutions, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the "Claims Administrator").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the County and Claims Administrator, did on October I, 1995
execute and deliver a Claims Administration Contract, as amended (the "Agreement") and
has also amended said contract effective October 1, 1996: and,
WHEIKEAS, the County and Claims Administrator desire to amend the Agreement
pursuant to the terrn5 ofthis Amendment; and
W~LEREAS, the County desires the services of the Claims Administrator to
perform run off claims administration services.
Now Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto do agree as follows:
Section 8.3 shall be added to Article VIII, TERM F A REEME AND
TERM]NATION and shall read as follows:
8.3 la'~ lira Incurr dPri r th T rmin ti n fthi
A reement un off laim Pr s in . The County shall have the right to
request that the Claims Administrator process claims with incurred service
dates prior to the cancellation date of the original Agreement or the
Amendments thereto ("run offclaims") but not received during the term ofthe
original Agreement or the Amendments thereto and payable pursuant to the
County's plan ofbenefits in effect at that time. Such processing shall be
payable at a fee of $15 per employee per month and shall be based upon the
enrolled employee count as of December 1, 1996. Such fee shall supersede
and replace the fees included in this Agreement pursuant to Section 1.16 and
Exhibit "A". Such processing services shall be performed for a three month
period beginning January 1, 1997. Payment for such services shall be due and
payable at the end of the month for which services were performed.
If run off claims processing services are sought beyond the term of'this
Amendment, the County through its Risk Management Director shah have the
right to extend the length of service desired by providing written notice o£its intent
to extend the term of'this Amendment prior to its termination date. The fee to
extend this Amendment shall be either $15 per employee per month or $15 per
claim processed subject to the selection of the County. Payment for such services
shall be due and payable at the end of the month for which services were
performed. Under no circumstances shall this Amendment be extended beyond
May 31, 1997 without the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida.
Ail other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
throughout the term of the Agreement and the three month period beginning
January 1, 1997 and, if applicable, any subsequent extension ofthis Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment this
~, r'~ day of ::3-~,,,,,,~,ey , 199'7.
Printed Name of Witness
Printed Name of Witness
PCA SOLUTIONS, INC.
PRESIDENT
(Corporate Seal)
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK
BOARD OF COUNTY
COM]~SSIONERS,
COLLEER COUN'TY, FLOR.IDA
By:
By:
Deputy Clerk
CHAIRMAN
Michael Pettit,
Assistant County Attorney
JAN 2 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO OBTAIN BOARD EXAMINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE
SUFFICIENCY OF BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS.
OBJECTIVE: To comply with Horida Statutes, Section 137.05, regarding the Duty of
County Commissioners to examine the sufficiency of Bonds of County Officers.
CONSIDERATIONS: Section 137.05, Florida Statutes, provides:
The county commissioners of the various counties of the ~tate shall at their regular
meeting in January and June of each year examine carefully as to the sufficiency of bonds
of the county officers of their respective counties, and if by reason of death, assignment,
or insolvency of any of the sureties on the bonds of said officers, they have reason to
believe that the sufficiency of said bond has become impaired, they shall at once report the
same to the Governor, who shall call upon and require such officer or officers to execute
and file with the proper officer a new bond for the same amount, under the same
conditions as his former bond.
The ~sk Management Department has checked the current ratings of the sureties for each bond
and found them to be satisfactory. No reason was found to believe that the sufficiency of said
bonds has become impaired. A list ofall bonds is attached.
The amounts of the bonds have been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and all appear to
be within the bounds set by Florida Statutes.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the bond amounts, the Board must refer to the Florida Statutes
sections shown for each officer below.
TAX COLLECTOR F.S. 137.02:
The tax collector of each county shall give bond in a sum to be fixed by the board of
county commissioners of the respective county, subject to the approval of the Department
of Banking and Finance as to amount and surety. This bond shall be specifically
conditioned to account duly and faithfully for all taxes collected by the tax collector. In
fixing said bond the board of county commissioners shall take into consideration the
amount of money likely to be in the custody of the collector at any one time.
PROPERTY APPRAISER F.S. 137.03:
The county property appraiser shall give a bond, the amount of which shall be fixed by the
board of county commissioners at not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000. In fixing
the arnount o£ said bond, the board of county commissioners shall take into con~! ~'~A
/ A .! T(~q . /
the amount of money likely to be in the custody of the property appraiser at any Te Km~
l 2 8 lgg?
SHERIFF F.S. 30.02:
In each county in the state, having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last
state census, the sheriff shall, before being commissioned, give bond in a penalty which
shall not be less than S10,000 nor more than S25,000 to be fixed by the board of county
commissioners of his count,/', payable to the Governor of the state and his successors in
office, with two or more good and sufficient sureties to be approved by the board of
county commissioners and the Department of Banking and Finance, and to be filed with
the Department of State, which bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of
the duties of his office.
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS F.S. 98.015:
(1) A Supervisor of Elections shall be elected in each county at the general election in
each year the number of which is a multiple of four for a 4-year term commencing on the
first Tuesday after the first Monday in January succeeding his election. Each supervisor
shall, before performing any of his duties, take the oath prescribed in s. S, An. II of the
State Constitution and give a surety bond payable to the Governor in the sum of $5,000,
conditioned on the faithful discharge of his duties.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS F.S. 137.04:
Each and every county commissioner of the several counties of the state, elected or
appointed to such office before he is commissioned, shall be required to give a good and
sufficient bond with not less than two sureties, or a surety company duly authorized under
the laws of the state, in the sum of $2,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of the
duties of his office, which bond shall be approved by the board of county commissioners
and the Department of Banking and Finance. The premium of the bonds given with surety
companies as sureties shall be paid out of the county treasury.
CLERK OF COURTS F.S. 28.02:
In each county of the state, having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last
state census, the clerk of the circ. uit court shall, before being commissioned, give bond in a
penalty which shall not be less than $5,000 nor more than $100,000 to be fixed by the
board of county commissioners of his county, payable to the Governor of the state and his
successors in office, with two or more good and sufficient sureties to be approved by the
board of county commissioners and the Department of Banking and Finance, and to be
filed wi[h the Department of State, which said bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful
discharge of the duties of his office.
Section 137.10, Florida Statutes, eliminates the two surety requirements found in some of the
above-mentioned statutory sections where such surety is a surety company authori:r~cl to tip
FARMERS HOblE ADMINISTRATION Fidelity Bond:
The Fidelity Schedule Bond involving utilities finance and the Farmers Home Administration in
the amount of $150,000 is to comply with the loan remlution entered into by the Board of County
Commissioners on July 24, 1979 (attached as Exhibit A). Said loan resolution authorized and
provided for the incurrence of indebtedness for the purpose of providing a portion of the cost of
acquiring, constructing, enlarging, improving, and/or extending .~-,wage collection .,.-,wices within
the area of the Marco Water and Sewer District (Marco Sewer Phase I Improvements). In .,aid
loan resolution, it is provided that the Board of County Commissioners acquire and maintain vach
insurance coverage, including fidelity bonds, ~ may be required by the United States
Government, Farmers Home Admini~ration. County Staff has been advised by Insurance Risk
Management Services (the County's insurance broker) that the amount of the bond presently
required to meet Farmers Home Administration requirements is $150,000. A.s reflected in the
attached schedule, the premium for raid bond is $351. Each risc, al year, review and changes are
performed for allowance of reduction of indebtedness of the value and reduction of outstanding
bond value. Premiums are assessed for outstanding bond value.
FISCAL IMPACT: All premiums listed are for the life of the bond except the Tax
Collector's, which is an annual premium. Funds for these bonds have been appropriated under
Fund #516 and have been paid. There is no further fiscal impact on the current 1996-97 fiscal
year budget.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board examine and approve the sufficiency of the bonds
on the attached list.
PREPARED B~~~ DATE:
Ly~. Evar~, Sera'or Risk Management Analyst
KEVIEWED BY:
j~-r~y Wal~e~, Risk Management Director
Leo E. Ochs, Jr., Su "' Sen'ices Administrator
DATE: /~'7/5 7
DATE: ///~?'
0
0
0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o o
~ 0 ~
0 ~ ~ m m U ~ 0 ~ 0
~ ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~ 0 · ~ ~ ~ 0
o
o
o
0
0
Om
APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS
BCC AGENDA OF 1/'28/97
WATER IMI:)ACT FEE (411)
BUDGET AMENDMENT 97-099
Cgmbined Water Capital Proiect
Operating Expense
Reserves
Total
$2,800
(2.$00~
~xolanation;
Fends are needed to make impact fee reimbursements associated with the Wyndcmerc Water
Impact Fee Settlement. These were initially overlooked because of delays in refund applications
and in some cases because the original impact fee payment had not been initially identified.
AGF. NDA ITEM
No. t~ ~- b ~
JAN 2 8 1997
Pg. ~,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMEN~ THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCEPT AND
IMPLEblENT THE ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION PROGRAM, PHASE II
PRESENTED BY THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISORS AND PREPARED BY
FLORIDA PLANNING GROUP, INC.
!2..B2Ta.CJ..t2~: To have the Board of County Commissioners accept and implement the
Economic Diversification Program prepared by the Florida Planning Group, Inc, in conjunction
with the Council of Economic Advisors and the Economic Development Council of Collier
County.
CONSIDERATION: The Board of County Commissioners formed the Council of Economic
Advisors to develop strategies designed to enhance the community's efforts to become more
competitive economically and increase the number of year round high wage jobs available to
residents. On June 18, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners entered into a contract with
Florida Planning Group, Inc. to prepare an economic diversification program for Collier County.
The Florida Planning Group, Inc. has had monthly meetings with the Council of Economic
Advisors, Economic Development Council of Collier County and other interested citizen groups
to compile and prepare this Economic Diversification Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: This Economic Diversification Plan will guide the implementation of the
public/private sector Economic Diversification Program approved in the 1997 budget for
$180,000.
GROW] H MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Collier County Comprehensive Plan does not have
an Economic Development Element within it, however, the Board of County Commissioners
identified economic diversification as an essential item as a goal for 1996/1997. Diversifying
the economy to reduce the residential tax base will affect several elements within the Growth
Management Plan.
RECOMMEN'DATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accept and implement the
Economic Diversification Program for Collier County prepared under the direction of the
Council of Economic Advisors by. the Florida Planning Group, Inc. and recommend
implementation by staff.
GMJ~d
PREPARED BY:
Greg Mih~, Director --
Housing and Urban Improvemen
t
7 7
Executive Summary
Economic Diversification Program, Phase II
Page Two
.lames F,. l.o,~kil[, Chairman
Council of Economic Advisors
~ Develapmm~t Council of Collier County
Community Dev. And Environmental Svcs.
Dat~
c/grcg/¢xsumredp
Naples
Metropolitan Statistical
Area
Economic Diversification Program
Florida Planning Group, Inc.
1. ACTION ITEM SYNOPSIS
Collier County Economic Diversification Program
Action Items Synopsis
PROBLEM: Contrasting Economy: Collier County has the highest median income in the
state driven ,n large part by passive income and a seasonal hourly wage base providing
limited upward mobility. This places an undue burden on a small proportion of property
owners.
SITUATION: Tax revenues are overly dependent upon residential property taxes.
Continuation of tiffs over-dependence on residential property taxes will result in increased
taxes, red',.tztion in services or compromising our qualify of life. This revenue shortfall is
aggravated b) lower wage jobs which consume more services than they produce in tax
revenue.
RECOMMENDATION: The economy is historically population growth oriented. The
economy needs diversification to increase year round high wage employment opportunities
for residents and to improve economic stability.
Program: - Necessary to Achieve Success
· Enhance property values through a value added public investment program.
· Dc,,.::lop a World Class Medical Community that attracts both practitioners and
cuttl:,:~ :~dge technology.
Crea~.s. high wage economic opportunities for County residents through small
business assistance and customized job training.
· Diver>;iB/the local economy to enable residents to establish/expand their
businc~ses in the county.
· Enh,,c~ce the tourism program by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off-
SeRSOB.
Organizational: - Support of Existing Strong Public/Private Partnership - Required for a
Strong Program
· Strengthen the BCC's role in economic diversification
· Economic Development Council as central focal point
· Economic Foundations Committee (business and education)
· Business Roundtable
Staffing: - Additional Staffand Resources will be Required - Crucial Resources
· County: Business Ombudsman/Clerical Support
· EDC: Three Additional Professional Staff
· Business Incubator Program
· Customized Job Training
Collier County Economic Diversification Pro,ram
Action Items Synopsis Page Two
o
Limited Use of Incentives: - Leverage Outside Grant Dollars for Optimum
Effectiveness
Match State Grants
· Focus on High Wage Jobs
· Focus on Immokalee and Everglades City
Budgeting: - Transition From Business Tax to Grant Funds.
· County Match $250,000 - EDC Match $250,000
· County Staff- Initial $100,000
· Source- Initial: Occupational License Tax
Long-Term: Addition of CDBG Funds
Other Actions: - Measurable Accountability
· Yearly EDC/CountyPartnership Work Program
· Yearly Data/MarketingMaterials Update
· Ongoing InventoryofAvailableBuilding/Land
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Naples
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Background:
Collier County (the Naples MSA) is one of the most attractive places in the world. The rare
combination of warm climate, extensive natural resources, and the high quality manmade
environment epitomized by 'old Naples' have long made the county a popular area. The
local economy reflects the area's cachet in the international marketplace as a selective,
upscale residential and tourism location.
Attract-.,d by this quality of life, the county's population has doubled in the last 15 years. It
will add another 100,000 people during the next 15. Along with this growth will come
another 30,000 part-time residents, who will visit and maintain seasonal homes in the
county. Yet despite this rapid growth, the county is still a relatively small community, with
188,000 year-round residents.
Population Growth
While future growth is inevitable, the county's residents have raised some legitimate
concerns about the cumulative effects of the growth on their lifestyles. They are worried
that a decline in the county's high quality of life might result, which would lower their
property values and lead to increased congestion and crime. These are very real concerns
in an economy that is so heavily baaed on providing a high quality of life.
While the county's economy is sluggishly recovering from the 1990-91 national recession,
it is still vulnerable to future recessions. The lack of a diversified economy also limits the
availability of the high quality workforce needed to provide the levels of service expected in
a market like Naples. This type oi economy also places the burden for local property taxes
on the county's residents. The county's agricultural industry is now in decline and many
local businesses are being adversely impacted by the increased accessibility from the north
and east that 1-75 and the Southwest Florida International Airport have brought.
There is good reason for these concerns about the local economy. Left to themselves,
without a sound plan for economic diversification, these issues can very easily become self-
fulfilling prophecies.
Economic Diversification Program
Executive Summary
Faced with this challenge, the BCC appointed a Council of Economic Advisors.
representing a wide spectrum of the community, to work in public/private partnership with
the business community's Economic Development Council (EDC). Their task wa.: to
develop an effective strategy to ad&t-.ss these economically related problems. The county
also retained Horida Planning Group, Inc. to provide professional support to this effort.
This report is the result of their collex:ti:/e efforts.
The Naples' Economy
The county has what economists refer :c as a single point economy, one that is driven by a
single source. Every economy has d,v::, parts. First are the 'basic' industries, those that
are the area's primary employers ','? :q,ples this is the residential consumer market. The
secondary industries, like const;~,.'.~.i~..% medical, hospitality and most local manufacturing
are directly linked to this basic eec. homy. The support industries, retail, services and
government provide services to the se.:o:ldary industries.
· S c~vicc s
.. Wh~le sale
· Oovemm¢ nt
· Educ sllon
The local economy is, in large mcasur:, dictated by the demographic makeup of the people
who live here. People form themselve.~ into households, and in Collier County the house-
holds are more likely to:
Be older
35 percent are over 65, versus 23 percent for US and 29 percent for Florida.
Have higher incomes
18 percent are over $75,000, versus 15 percent for US and 12 percent for Florida.
Be wealthier
25 percent have a household wealth of over $250,000, versus 16 percent for both
the US and Florida.
Collier County has the highest median family income in the state at $48,800, and the
highest effective buying income in the state at $41,425. The county's residential market
makes up 77 percent of the county's property tax base, significanlly higher than the
statewide average of 66 percent.
Economic Diversification Program 2
Executive Summa~
Percent of Assessed Valuation
Residential
Collier
Florida
As a select residential enclave, the county's local economy is in great measure fled dkecfly
to meeting the needs of the large concentration of affluent seniors and part-time residents
during the winter season. The significant amount of money that flows into the county from
other areas as investment income and ~ransfer payments is the financial underpinning of the
local economy. Collectively, these sources accounted for $8 percent of' all personal income
received in the county in 1994. The county's lotal personal income by source received
from dividends, interest and rents, at 46 percent of all income, is nearly twice the statev.~de
average and almost three times the national average.
persqnul
Dividends, Interest und Rents
Collier
Florida
With die exception of the county's large agricultural sector, centered in Immokalee, and
some small manufacturing concerns, over 90 percent of the county's economy is directly
tied to the residential consumer businesses market. As a result, the majority of the county's
businesses are small and there are many single proprietors. Employment is concentrated in
such population growth dependent sectors as consu'uction, retail sales and services. Many
of these jobs are seasonal and low paying.
The affluent, elderly base directly influences the types of businesses that will be drawn to
Collier County. Most of the county's are small. Eighty percent of all companies have rev,'er
than ten employees. The county also has one-fifth of its workforce employed as single
Economic Diversification Program
Executive Summary
proprietors. In addition to the long-term cyclical nature of the economy, it is also highly
seasonal' busy during the winter season and slow during the summer off-season.
Munlhly ~mplo?ment
Employment patterns reflect the structure of the local economy. Manufacturing only makes
up three percent of the local workforce, versus ten percent of Florida's and thirteen percent
of the national workforce. Construction, one of the county's mainstays, makes up ten
percent of the local employment base, nearly twice the Florida average of six percent and
the US's of five percent. The area also has strong medical, tourism, hospitality, retail,
service and agricultural industries.
MANUFACTURI,~G
SERVICES
RETAIL TRADE
f
Economic Diversification Program 4
Executive Summar7
Future Prognosis
The future prognosis for the county's basic economy appears strong. The U.S. economy is
healthy and will continue to grow, although it will still be subject to cyclical recession.
Florida will continue to see strong, real growth and will add more people over the coming
years then any other state in the country. Collier County is also expected to see strong
continued growth over the next 15 years, as it adds another :00,000 permanent residents.
The county's strong growth sectors will continue to be retail and services, which have low
wage structures. The hospitality, construction and the medical sectors will also grow.
Why Economic Diversification?
There are a variety of reasons why communities engage in economic diversification
activities. These include: enhancing property values, reducing residential property taxes,
recession-proofing the local economy, increasing local business and year-round
employment opportunities for their residents, attracting new businesses, or some
combination of all of these reasons. Because each community is different, each has its own
community goals, and its own strengths and weaknesses from an economic diversification
standpoint. To be successful, each community must develop its own custom-tailored
strategy.
How?
There are two basic rules for successful economic diversification:
Rule One: Build on your strengths; and
Rule Two: Minimize your weaknesses.
Economic Strengths and Weaknesses
When seen from a economic diversification viewpoint, every community has strengths and
weaknesses. Some are readily apparent, some are not so noticeable, and some are only of
interest to particular companies, because businesses look at a community through their own
perspective.
The Naples area has a number of positive economic strengths beyond its base economy of
affluent residents. The county's quality of life is an immense advantage, especially since
high technology businesses are now able to locate their companies in almost any location.
The county has a high corporate employee transfer acceptance level, a strong hospital
network, excellent local schools and public services, and a low crime rate. All of these
make the county an extremely attractive location.
The Council of Economic Advisors conducted detailed individual interviews with 50 of the
county's CEO's. The respondents felt that the county's quality of life was the single most
important reason why a company would desire to locate here.
Economic Diversification Program 5
Collier County is a small sized metropolitan market (under a million people) and is also
relatively remote from a transportation point of view. While this remoteness has help. ed
protect the county's high quality of life, it effectively prevents the county from attracnng
any large businesses.
The lack of a trained workforce was cited by the county's CEO's as the single greatest
problem for local businesses. With few available buildings and sites, the county's real
estate community ~.!so has difficulty meeting the needs of many businesses, because the
vast majority of companies looking at an area want to move into an existing location.
Companies are also concerned about ~e existing business mix of an area. Increasingly,
companies are beginning to actively ..,eek to cluster together within regions or specific
locations. These companies have discovered the a:jva.ntages of the synergy that can be
developed by clustering, which includes sharing ideas, drawing from a talented employee
base, }oint ventures, and research and development. Collier County presently has no
identihed industry clusters to build upon.
For some companies the 'cost of doing business' is their primary concern. These
companies are affected by the collective cost of payroll, rents, taxes, utilities and shipping
costs. These companies can find any number of rr:,.'.re at~ctive locations within Florida,
including neighboring Lee County. The county also suffers from a perception that it has a
poor business climate. As the county's CEOs also noted, the county is not the location for
all businesses.
This assessment allows us to develop a profile of the :ype of companies that have a good fit
with the county. Essentially, the kinds of companies iha: will be attracted to the county will
be small, progressive, high technolGgy oriented, nonpolluting, value-added businesses that
are primarily concerned with providing a high quality environment as an inducement to
attract and retain a high quality workforce.
Program Development
The development of a diversification program F~'st requires that some overall goals be
established to guide the program.
To be successful, these goals must support the community's 'vision' of itself and reflect on
the kind of community that its residents wish to leave for their grandchildren.
The residents of Collier County generally share the same vision:
To maintain and enhance the Naples' world-class quality of life.
This vision of the future suggests a number of goals for the economic diversification
program:
(I) Enhance Property Values
through a value added public investment program.
(2) Develop a World Class Medicai Community
that attracts both practitioners a,.zl cutting edge technology.
Economic Diversification Program 6
Executive Summary
(3) Create High.Wage Economic Opportunities for County Residents
through small business assistance and customized job training.
(4) Diversify the Local Economy
to enable residents to establish/expand their businesses in the county.
(5) Enhance the Tourism Program
by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off-season.
WNle these may at f'rrst glance appear to be disparate goals, they are all interrelated within
the context of the Naples' economy.
(1) Enhance Property Values
Maintaining property values is one of the primary purposes of local government and is
certaiN? a legitimate governmental concern. The long-term strength of the county's basic
industry- the overlapping combination of affluent retirees, seasonal residents, and tourism
- is directly dependent on maintaining a high quality of life environment.
In the long run, preserving the county's quality of lite is the single most important thing
that the county can do for the local economy.
Enhancing property values requires that the county adopt a value added, investment
oriented growth management program. This strategy includes acquiring and preserving the
county's extensive natural resources, adopting high quality urban design standards, fully
funding road and storm drainage programs, providing high quality public service levels and
having top flight schools. In conjunction with this effort the county should adopt a strategy
to shift its general business and manufacturing facilities east of the interstate.
(2) Develop a World Class Medical Community
With the large concentration of senior citizens within the region and the high quality of life
within the community, the superior locally based medical industry of Collier County has
the potential to attract top flight medical practitioners and medically-related high technology
and research facilities. The medical technologies sector is one of the most rapidly growing
sectors of the world economy. Expanding this sector would increase the level of medical
services available to the county's residents, as well as diversify and strengthen the local
economy. The medical sector offers the greatest potential within the county to grow into an
industry cluster.
(3) Create High.Wage Economic Opportunities for Local Residents
The current economy will continue to create a number of Iow paying, cyclical and seasonal
(busy during the season, laid off during the off season) jobs in the retail trade and services
industry. The lack of business and employment opportunities in other sectors ultimately
hurts the local business community's ability to attract the quality labor force that is
necessary to provide the high business service levels that are the Naples' standard.
To achieve this goal will require the county to emulate its neighbors and implement
comprehensive small business assistance and customized job training pro.ams in
partnership with the local business and education communities. These programs are
designed to help local residents prosper as ,.,,'ell as ensure th:it the county can maintain a
high quality worlcforce.
Economic Diversification Program 7
Executive Summary
(4) Diversify the Local Economy
Diversification can help to both recession-proof the local econotny and shift the tax base
away fi.om residential to non-resident'ial uses, which typically pay far more in local
property taxes then they require in public services. Collier County should not expect to be
home to any major industries, nor should it seek to am'act them, but it is an ideal location
for those resident; that wish to locate their high value add,:d small business near their
homes. The hnmoicalee area, with its upgraded airport arid business park, offers a high
quality location for locating new businesses to the area. 'Ire 1-75 interchanges also offer
excellent locations for new corporate office park development. 1,nplemenfing this program
will require a public/private partnership with the local business and real estate community to
ensure that there are available sites and buildings for new companies.
(5) Enhance the Tourism Program
The county's highly successful tourism program focuses on the county's world class resort
facilities located we~t of US 41. Unfortunately, the seasonal nature of this program leaves
these facilities apd their employees underutilized during the s,Jmmer. The fastest growing
sector of the international tourism market is in ecotourism, ,'~[ 'Milch the county, with thc
Everglades National Park and its other large nature preserves is ideally suited to serve.
Because this rr, arket is not seasonally driven and often occurs in the summer, when families
and Europeans u'avel, it is a natural complement to the county's existing tourism
development program.
Action l'lan
While the county is new to economic diversification, it cat, draw on the lessons learned
from successful economic diversification programs acro:~s Florida and the nation to develop
a custom-tailored, cost effective program to achieve the county's diversification goals.
The recommended Action Plan has five interrelated components:
(1) Continue a Quality Growth Management Program.
The county government w/Il need to continue its strong role in adopting and funding a
value-added capital improvements program, especially for roads, drainage and natural
resource preservation; mainta/ning high public service levels and strong design standards:
and working with the education community to ensure that the county's schools are the best
in Florida.
(2) Form and Support a Strong Public/Private Partnership.
The county will need to join with the local business community to create a single
organizational structure to support the overall diversification efforts. The existing EDC can
form the basis for this partnership, but it will need to be augmented to handle the additional
duties it will be undertaking. This combined organization should enter into the ongoing
regional and storewide economic diversification efforts, and will need to be supported
through county funding, as it is in all other Florida communities.
Economic Diversification Program
, ~ ~lll I I I III I III I I II IIIIIIIIII III I I
Executive Summary
(3) Improve the Business Climate.
There are a number of actions that the county can take to improve the business climate.
These include: forming a CEO roundtable to provide a forum for the county to hear local
business concerns; publishing a 'Guide to Local Porn'fitting' handbook to assist local
businesses with regulations; streamlining the development review process (currently the
number two business incentive in the country): forming an economic diversification rapid
response technical assistance team; and providing and maintaining a detailed socioeconomic
information database on the county.
(4) Develop a Coordinated Business Assistance Program.
There are a number of successful programs available to help increase opportunities for local
resider ts. These include a small business development center and business incubator
programs that assist in business startups; a retention/expansion program to help existing
businesses prosper; business financial assistance packaging support; and customized job
training programs. Collectively they will enable the county to effectively support its small
business community.
(5) Diversify the Economy.
The county can best support the diversification effort by assisting those residents who wish
to locate or expand their businesses within the county, as well as recruiting the select group
of high value added technology-oriented companies that have a good fit with the county's
existing business makeup. This effort will require that the county maintain up-to-date
.marketing and informational databases, respond to informational requests, maintain an
inventory of available buildings and sites, conduct targeted business recruitment programs,
and package any business incentives that may be required.
This program will enable the county to address the concerns of its residents
and its business community, diversify the local economy, and form a
lasting partnership for progress.
Economic Diversification Program 9
3. COMMUNITY PROFILE ,
Location 2
Population 3
Households $
Employment 7
Transportation 10
Business Costs 1I
Banks anti Depositories 12
Education 13
Housing 14
.Medical 15
Quality of Life 16
For more information contact:
Economic Development Council of Collier Count)'
.~_00 Bailey Lane, Suite 162 (941) 263-8989
Naples, Florida 33942 (941 ) 263-6021 Fax
www: swflorida business, com,'naples.edc
Collier Count.,,', the Naples MSA, is located in the heart of Southwes! Florida, at the center ora vibrant.
!ntemational ly-oriented community. Although easily accessible to major metropolitan areas. Collier County
~s largely untroubled b)' urban woes. With a total area of 2,149 square miles, and a land area of 2,02~
square miles, Collier is the second largest county east of the Mississippi River, and is larger than the states
of Rhode Island and Delaware.
Yet, it is unlike nearly an)' other area. Here, a population ofextraordinary sophistication li~es in hah'nom,'
with an env:ronment ot' awesome beauty. For businesses, their owners and emplo.¥ees alike. Collier
Count',' is an opportunity without comparison, l.(,caled on Florida's unspoiled Southwest coast Collier
blessed with an unparalleled combination of business potential and livabilitv. This is the second fastest
growing metropolitan area in the United States, with an afTluent population and significant business
resources. Yet, at the same time, it is a community in which quality of life is carefully guarded and
continuously enhanced. That's why the people of Collier Count), consider this to be truly a paradise
found.
: L~GEND
COLLIER
SW4~.fP
· '. ....
G~,~F of Mexico
Florida's
Southwest
Coast
Seaports
0
DADE ~
The Naples MSA s~ts m the heart ofthe three-county
Southwe,;~ ['!ur~da Region. Collectively, this area
has been, ~,qct .,. ,,'. cor, tinue to be, one ofthe fastest
growing regions ;,, the countrs,. This area's popula-
tion will grow from 694,800 today to !,100,500 in
2015.
Collier 187,400 ! ':. 321,000
Charlotte 129,500.
'1:,,.~ 214,200
Lee 377,900' ',:.: 565,300
~:: 1,100,500
Total 694,800
.No.r~ ¢ ! .tverqtg' of l.'lort, ht,
lce~t,,,r~ h, 1996
There are slight('.,, Jess than 200,000 people living in and around Naples today. There were only 16,000
people liv;%; ,~., Ihs County in 1960, while the population is expected to increase to about 353,500 by
2020. Colti,., ,',5~mt,/. like th,: state of Florida, expects to continue growing far into the future. In
addition, thc L'ou~, v's year-round population rises by one-th/rd during the Winter Season (Nov.-Apr.)
when/ts scaso~ql residents and visitors return.
R,'~c.,~h, 19'~t,
~9(.9 15,753
1970 38,040
1980 85,971
1990 152,099
I'¢95 187,400
2r;00 224,100
2t)lO 288,600
3,';3'*', "' '"'
. - , -,5.~.500
0 53.3(;0 IO0.CgC 1530CO 200 OCO 253.~0 303003 3."0 0~3 ,~02 0O3
Age Group Number
0-14 35,714
15-24 19,038
25-44 49,933
45-64 " ",
.~7,79.~
65--- 45,319
Rc~,'urch.
25-44
26%
15-24
10%
0-14
9%
White 95%
Black 5%
"I0tal 100%
Hispamc Origin* 13%
'th.vx~.tc~ may he ora.)' race
.ho. rte 1990 ~'S ('e~st~s
Collier 40.7
Florida 36.4
U.S. 32.9
45-64 24%
20%
Collier 10%
Flor/da 13%
U.S. 13~o
Populations group themselves into what are called households, v.'hich are comprised of families and non-
family households. In 1990, 72% ofth': Counb"s households were also families.
Number Percent
Families 44. t 36 72%
Non-Families 17.510 28%
Total 61,646
Households $34,001
Families 38.428
Non-Families 23,317
538,776
/996
S35 - 50 000
$2g. 25
,24 6%
I
Over $,~ 000
Median EI3I 537,624
Total EBI: 54.2 Billion
.~Unc~e- 20 000
21 6%
S48.800
Collier County had the highest Median Family In-
come and Household Median Effective Buying In-
come (EBI) in the State.
.¥ourr¢ : Deparmrem of Ho..*m$ m~l ( 'tho. Dev¢/o?n~em
Collier Percent Florida U.S.
<S25,000 21,747 29% 34% 37%
$25 - 50,000 6,070 8% 9% 9%
550- I00,000 10,438 14% 16% 15%
$I00-250,000 18,464 24% 25% 23%
S250-500,000 II,302 15% 11% 11%
>5500,000 7,501 10% 5°,/0 5%
.5'ourt¢ ('1. IR/I. D,. 1996
Median Household Wealth
Collier Florida U.S.
S98,831 $71,301 $63,860
Coil/er CountT's households have lugher household
weahh ranges when compared to Florida and U.S.
households.
Total <25 25-45 45-65 65-80 >80
Total Households 76,022 2,809 22,590 22,885 21,157 5,581
<$5,000 2,232 153 734 586 582 177
S5- 10,000 3,525 116 824 792 1,305 488
S10-15,000 4,339 184 1,128 939 1,553 535
SI5-25,000 11,451 702 3,268 2,851 3,619 1,011
S25-35,000 12,410 614 4,096 3,348 3,259 823
535-50.000 15,161 619 5,520 4,517 3.622 883
550- 75,000 13,549 306 4.775 4,570 3.165 733
575- I00,000 5,933 66 1,749 2,177 1,557 543
5100- 150.000 4,382 33 951 1,723 1,363 312
S150- 250,000 1,574 9 280 634 528 123
5250. 500,000 1,058 5 152 443 363 95
>5500,000 678 _
9 72 305 24 ] 58
.Median Income: S38,776
Age
<25
25-45
45-65
65.80
>80
Total
Number Percent Income Number
2,809 4% <525,000 21,547
22,590 30% $25.50,000 27,571
22,885 30% $50 - 75,000 13,549
21,157 28% $75- 100,000 5,933
5,581 7% >$100,000 7,692
76,022 100% Total 76,022
Pe rce n t
28%
36°/6
! 8%
8%
10%
100%
~:~'h:~'%'~',"~ [: .'..5,
,~; ~'~t.',~ ,'..' '.
Thc Counb,'s ~oml l~bor pool oF83,490 p~ople c~n o~r ~ ~id~ r~n~ oF~mplovmem skills to ~ potemi~l
employer. .
· ~';,:.'.,c, ,,.~ i;,¢ ':.... '~ .'.:? - ..' ~5.1..; .~:.....,.... -.
AgrJcu ture, Forestry and Fishing 10,68.3
Mining 3.5
Construction ?,206
Manufacturing 2,299
Transportation, Communications
and Public Utilities 2,027
Wholesale Trade 1,973
Re~ail Trade 18,795
Finance, Insurance and Rea//-"state 4,541
Services 24,451
Govemrnent 7,844
F/I/RE
Services
1%
Government
'"'-'-------10%
V,~olesa TICIPU '"danufaclunr~g
2%
3% 3%
83,490
':"- ' "Z "%':'::': s .i,,,i~ -::,.~...'~;
High School Graduate 79%
Bachelors Degree 15%
Graduate'Professional Degree 7%
.~ rte: /990 ~'A (.'etHtt~
Year Collier Florida
1990 5.6% 5.9%
1991 7.9% 7.30,'o
1992 9.4% 8.2%
~o,
1993 8.~ ,o 7.0%
1994 8.0% 6.6%
1995 6.80;0 6.00.0
.~mn. e
Flurt, lu I A'p.rm,e.t of l..h,,r t#~l £m?lfft me,tt .sec ttrt~
Company Nnme Type of Business Employees
PuH~x ~,:~ ' 'dtk:'t Inc Re,ad Ch~e~ Su~rkel 17:55
Mam,,u' ,;~ 'u,n lime[ Re~o~ctad
R~t/L ~:lt,,, :, Hold and Restauram 7~
N~pIc~ H~ :..h Ho~cl and Golf Club Hotel
B~mcu ~. :, of N~p~cs }~ 275
Cable TV S~cc 225
K-Ma~ L~ q~rahor ~pa~m~t Store 285
Dax~d 12 *. rcn,.~ Mcr,~l Hcahh Ccr,:cr Memal Ileahh Cbmc
M~nng~ Par~ }{omc~ Iht Aged
Marc~ It:~ch Ihh,,~ I[(,~cl
Vineyard, ~,,l(and C,*unt~ C'Jub L'~mn~. Cluh
..~
M~,m~, n. Inc Re~taurant~)~c~ 200
Cot~)tty
O¢cup.don .Mc~,n Mcdbm M.txlmum ~pm~on
O~cr
Finance. ]nsura~e. Real
..Mo,u,Hanm~ S 19 FM S l 7 .I I S 50 ~ C'(mlputct
LlcrmCal Su~,~,,r~ II (H Il 49 IX 19 C*,mpulcr ['n~mnccr~
Rcccph,,n,~t, ~ 19 7 9~ 12 ~t) C~N)L~ ~ ~2 8 ~ I~ 2.1
Hotcl [~k Clerk~
Msnuf~c[uring Jamh,r~ and Cl~ncr~ 7 29 ? 23 12 2')
A~mblcr~ and [abrtcalor~ ? J2 6 2~ 14 70 Medical A~I~IauI~ 9 ~)g I*) ~ I ~ (~1
[)ral'~et~ 1.1 27 I~ ~ 17 50
I',r~t-hnc I'rt~ucm,n Su~.,~ r~ 1~')5 19.~ 3U.~ Radi(*K~cal Tcchmc~an~ I~(
Industrial Pn~uchnn Managers 25 79 22 99 42 07 Salcs~r~n~ Rctad 6 65 6 ,~ lo 23
[.a~rcrs and Malcna] Mmcrs 6 69 6 44 13 ~
.Machmc~ Mcchmmcs 12 ~ 12 50 J5.2~ ('~s~uc/ion
Off~cl Press O~ra~ors [2 32 12 ~0 1450
Sh~pp~n~ and Rccc~m~ Clcrk~ 7 ~ ? 54 12 8~
gh<k L'lcrk~ 6 98 6 62 10 46 C,,n~Irucht,n ~,,rkcr~
~ :.', '.;unr¥ is home ',o a number ofsmall lo mid-size companies.
Industry Total 1-9 10-49 50.249 >250
A.t~ '.,':uirure 262 229 27 4
Mi r:,m.._, 9 7 2 0 0
C',",: ,',t~ '..t~on 885 716 151 18 0
M~,,',~r'~ctur/ng 180 129 42 8 1
, .... ~- :." atlorl and
Put,:,.. I i:~,ties 211 165 42 4 0
V,'h".!¢ ..,~e Trade 311 262 46 3 0
t,9;' '; '"..de 1,616 1,151 373 91 I
Fin~ -,~ .. '
,nsurance
ar,:! Fe~i Estate 886 764 109 12 i
Set'...,.:,..~, 2,137 1,761 292 74 I0
Unrl~sqfied 74 71 3 0 0
'Ibta~ 6,571 5,255 1,087 214 15
Percentage 100% 80% 1 7% 3 % .
"~' I 'SUni} has a ~:,rg..-scale agricultural compo-
,' ~ "" eaqte-n pnr, on ofthe County, centered
...... ~,:.),.:dlCC, ,,,:t 'r?j',,' agricuhural area and
,': ". ,:ente~ ?bt a ,,'~de range of fruits, plants
,". ,' ,co,-, ables
Commodity Acreage Sales
Tomatoes 12,780 $111,500,000
Peppers 4,150 S52,800,000
Cucumbers 1,400 $17,300,000
Watermelons 800 56,400,000
Squash 800 S4,500.000
Potatoes 2,300 S 14,000,000
Green Beans 1,780 S4,200,000
Citrus 36,534 S34,000,000
Misc. 950 $1,500,000
BeefCattle 238,680 53,441,074
Ornamentals 1,530 58,015,000
Total 302,704 S257,656,074
.V~mr~ ¢.. I )m',,r~s~. oJ' l'7,,rt, la ['.'rtcn~to. .~,,ra.tt e, I'196
Daily Fhgh~s Passenger Airlines
.,Xm~mcan
Airpom $pe~.~c.~iion~ Canad~n A.
Run..: ;en~*~ ' ~'flx lYJfi q'(~r
l~ha A~rhnw.
,~:nrlh,, e~l
T',,x, '.,
Iff ,;ed
United Expre.~ s
Charter Airlines:
Alt Il,,! Alrx'..~,~..,, %tiT1 ,I.vl
AV Al h,ntlc Vl~our~l All'
I~xpr~s ~ ~e
l~l~ure
Parad~ kl.no
Rmo
Sun ~'~nl ~
~952
198q
198~
1987
1986
?985
1934
/,,J' 9 3C2 9'0
~990
~ 2e3 ~73 .
1985 .
5 I0 15 20
Pou~S o~ Cargo. Mdlions
25
Coil/er County is also home to four large, well-maintained general aviation airports includim, the Naples
Airport ,,:.'l':.~c h offers commercial commuter flights. '
Airport Runway Length
Naples 5,000 (2)
Marco Island 5,000
Immokalcc 5,000
Everglades 2,400
Western: Seminole Gu[fRailway
]mmokalee' CSX
Aircraft Movements Commercial Carriers
108,000 AmeT/can Eagle. USAm C'ontt:l,:ntaI I".xpres~
8,700
22,000
348
· .:, ..ti'.?,:,:.. ". . '..
Interstate 75 to Tampa (North) and Miami (East/'
South)
· :' . . ,3 · ;':.'-:'.:
10
Millage Rate
C0unb' Governmental Operations 3.4899
Debt Service 0
School District 8 5930
Debt Servicc 0
Spec~at Services D/strict 0.0506
Independent Special Sen,ices District 0.4570
Collie: Count)' has the lowest property tax rate wn
the State
Total
,~).rce ('o/her
Eleclrical
Competiti,,e Rates
Florida Power and Light
Water
$I 75 -2,47/1,000gallons
12.5895
Sewer
$160/1,O00gallons
Solid XVaste
",'aries bv location
Total Rental %'acanca-
Square Range Rate
Feet (per Square
Foot)
Leasable Office Space 2 2 million 59-24.00 14%
Leasable Industrial Sp~c 20.1.0o0 $7.8.0{~ 12%
//
State
'ounty continues tu provide high-quality local schools ihat are considered to be the best in the
, ~ lorida
dhi!,;%to e ....,esc';oolteachersala~in * Ex~nditure~rpupilisS4,884
'm: .. 'e a~ 336,417 ~r )'tar · 755% of 1995 high-school ~aduates are continu-
· " :. "c'hc, s;~,~vea, ,astersDemeeorhigher ing their education
· 2 ',, ~' h,;dr,,~ ;re emol~ed in C~llier County lli~h-schooleraduationrateis94%
qtah ,?:.
:he i'lational median and
:adi,:- ( , ~prehension and Math-
rad,~ , I '~;-~,:ssment Test (GTAT).
Collier Florida
53 50
61 51
Collier Flor/da U.S.
Communications 441 420 428
Mathematics 501 469 482
Total 942 889 920
Percent of'Seniors
taking the test 50%
· Yource ('olher Cou.0 ~ hoot D~(tmc t
48% 41oo
Sch .~ '~'. ',)e Number Enrollment
Ele, . qt~. ,'(PreK-5.~19 13,256
.Mic '(( "'~; 6 5,569
Fl;,; ) 4 5,980
E,. s(K-!2i 1 260
Voc , :It ~ '-Ad.~h) ~) 2,565
Thc '.2,dq)' ~s also nomt: [o a number of private
schools a,'~d academies.
Collier Count), is also home to a range ofcol-
leges including the State's newest universiv,:
· Florida GulfCoast University
· Walden University
· Edison Communi't), College
· International CollegeofNaples
12
200000 ~$200,O00
14% ..... / 30%
!501
24%
$75. 100.000
17%
<$50.000
4%
75.O00
11%
Median value in 1990:S121,400
Median value in 1996:SI36,483
Median rent in 1990:S572 permonth
Median rent in 1996:$700 per month
:,' :b:': -.~.' I-, , ..j.. ...., , ..... :: , ;. '~:~.,?.~,,~.~
,.,,'~ ~er 43,319 70%
:~enter 18,384 30%
ir, :,.ddmon, almost 30,000 units, primarily con-
dominiums, are held for seasonal use.
$600 - 750
$400 - 600
37%
$250 - 400
12%
>$750
20%
<S250
7%
15
Medical
The primary provider 4' i[e.dtt- ~.'~.Te services tn Collier County is the NCH Healthcare System. This
system includes ~he
· Two locally-owned 4nd o!'
Naples Commuim: Hosi.,c:.'
Heart Surgeo: .:
Norlh Colher Ho.s~. .al h,, :9,
· Roughly 400physk:ans or;
· Urgent Care Center: ~ocate .h,.,
I~okalee
omp, cnensive hospitals:
?84 Acv.. Bedv. 24 ,~uh-acttte Bedv, a Psychiatric Center, an Open
/nit. a ? ?uroscience Unit and a ('ontinumg ~'ducation ('enter
tie Bet.. and a Women and Children's ('enter
:ohou, ;']oilier County: Marco Island, Golden Gate, East Naples and
· Wellness Center~ fc 'hea~ ~ !t:"'~, .... don an,, fitness
· Cardiac Cath labs ar, d Mae ? :,( ,,..,nn~c :: Imaging (~) facilities
· Comprehensive rehaOi
· Daysurge~andtrc m::ent
· Home Health Age~ c ',', se", '.,.: :iii' :ns ofCollier CounD', from Naples to Immokalee
· workCare, the fir'.~ ~,ospi ~o%o, cd pm~¢am for workers' com~nsation patients, is approved by
the State of FI,..~& and v .:~ ,,': r'.,xir, ,m discount of 10% offofsmndard rates, work(~re is
desired to safeSy, "turn; ,r, * ,vod'ers ,-, .i~eir regular duties and quickly and e~ciently as ~ssible.
14
Quality of Life
Collier County's cultural and recreational resources satisfy every taste:
' The PhJlharrnor~c Center for the Arts, opened in late 1989,
includes concert hnlls and art galleries, a_nd serves as the
home of the Nap[es-Marco Philha. n'non, c Orchestra and
the Gulf Co xst home of the MJarni Ballet. It offers the full
range of activities from opera to pops to Broadway plays
and lectures.
World class art galleries and outdoor art and craft shows
· Thirty-eight miles of sandy beaches and famous shelling
· ~lore than 46 golf courses; Number One in number of
holes per capita
· Boating and fishing in the Gulf. numerous bays and ca-
nals. and the Ten Thousand Islands
Shopping, from quaint villages to a major mall
· Attractions include the Collier County Historical Museum,
Frannie's Teddy Bear Museum and Jungle Larry's Zoo-
logical Park
The Tropicool Festival, an annual, we,..k .long celebration
in May including the Taste of Collier and the Great Dock
Canoe Race, attracting over I0,000 spectators each year
Special events including the Swamp Buggy Races. Re-
gattas, the Chili Cook-off. Seafood Festival, Indian Days,
.Mullet Festival and many others
National Championship girls' softball leagues and other
organized sports programs for kids
The Everglades City area is a must for those who want to
discover the real Florida. A gateway to two national parks,
the Everglades City area is rich in O!d Florida charm.
Untouched by urban development, the atmosphere is se-
rene and reminiscent of the earlier days in Florida history.
It is also noted as one ofthe sport-fishing capitals of the
world.
i"o~ ;he environmentalist, eeo-tourism opportunities
"-bound. Collier County is home to three state parks and
t..,,n c.~tional parks.
Slate Parks
Collier Seminole State Park
Delr,¢: Wiggins Pass State
P. ecr.;at,on Area
Fakaha(chee Strand State
Pre~.e ';e
,u s,.~ or!merest:
Cons:.rvancy Nature Center
Corkscrew Swamp S~ctua~
(94 ! ) 394-3397
(941 ) 597-6196
(941) 695-4593
(941) 262-0304
(941) 657-3771
Nat!onal Parks
Cypress National Prese~,e
£¢er£~a,ies National Park
(94 I) 263-3532
(941) 695-3311
Collier County has a lower crime rate than either
the State or the Nation as a whole. In addition,
cr/me rates in the County have been decreasing over
the last several years
Coilier County's relative price level index for 1995,
wtu.::h measures the cost of living, was 103.68. This
wa: ]c';¢er than both Broward and Dade Counties
'.,.'~i,.? reported indexes at 104.93 and 106.78, re-
~;pe,;~.:' e. ly The most costly item was food (107.65)
,vit~.i ¢,e least costly item being apparel (95.60).
~O'.'~ e .c~Ort, ta Dept~rtm,,nt of Con,,erc e. .4pfd. 1996
15
4. ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION
PROGRAM
" ~ ~ iii I IIII II I IIII I IIIIIIIII II II I
Economic Base
Part One:
The Economic Base
Summary
Coil/er County .. the Naple.i metropolitan statistical area (MSA) - is a rapidly growing Florida
market. ~,e N:p!es e.c. or~o,.o? is driven by the impact of affluent retirees and seasona! residents
who a.m. ,.;:..':, v:, ,:y w,~ ,,p¢,~:mg, upscale quality of life. Naples is located al,..n;~ Florida's
southwcs, .Dull' .::,:tst t~,~fil t~',e completion of 1-75, this market was relatively ~solated. The
county',.~ ecc,,:,:,-.'~,, ;5 cer~::::,.l¥ service oriented and seasonal, with production largely directed to
serving the loca.' uprcale cc.,:,umer market.
The Napl¢:s MSA b:,d a r,' ~,aent population base of 188,000 in 1995 and is widely recognized as a
high grov:th market. Co~,cr (3,unty led the state of Florida during the last five years with a 4.0
percent .mr,:.? .iC'~w0' .'>., )'hr; growth rate was more than twice the state's and ovec four times
the natio.:?.t r,,: L'bc .r'.'.:'rv "r:~rket. however, is relatively small. Naples is the 17th largest of
Florida'~ 2" ; :' .... ~c.:: :,.:, ,:own the list in terms of absolute population growth, adding only
7500 nc..: :,~.:,ae,',< a fe~. '~:~ Naples MSA accounts for about 15 percent of the residents IMng
in the four sc.u~hwe,;t Flo, ~,.~a MSAs.
Collier County'= econon',.~ ~s almost entirely dependent upon net inmigration for population
grow'th. 'lT~ose ag..:d 65 a' ,.! over are increasing at a five percent rate, as compared to less than four
percent %r p'tq~e v,orkin~-.' a,;,~ and school age residents. Among the prime working age, the 40-54
age gq :.,. :) ,s .;.:en;~g~ ~;,~ .g a: over seven percent pe~ year pace. About one in four c.;~idents are
over 65 :,.Id aec, ut one in :,~,~ is over 75. In Florida, the proportion of s~niors is less, .just 18.7
percent arc over 65.
Naples attracts ~.~pper incc, cne residents and had a per capita personal income in 1994 of $30,900.
This is O.~ ,bird bigbe.;t ;: .... ::apita income in the state and about 43 percent greater than both the
state and ,at/o, ~ avera,:':-', lhe personal income comparisons are even more impressive when
account is take, of the £,:.t mat private pensions and capital gains are not included in the income
data. The la,'gest ::orate .. ve,'sonal income within the county is comprised of dividend.';, interest
and rent. Over 46 cent,: ,,! .:,,er/dollar in personal income is derived from these kinds of property
income. }.-/o~ida a,,erag,..: v,.~l.,; about half this proportion of investment income. On a per capita
basis, this property income averages over $14,000, but is largely concentrated among the one
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 1
Economic Base
quarter of the residents that have retired. Wages, salaries, and proprietor's income account for just
42 percent of total income in conu'-agr to nearly 60 percent for Florida and 70 percent nationally.
Transfer payments, primarily go',,en~ment retirement and medical payments, round out the
remainder of personal income payments with 11.6 percent of the total.
CoLlier County has proportionally more upper income households and fewer lower income
households than the state or nation. The affluent can be found with the seniors as well as among
the 35 to 55 year olds. Over eight l~erc::-:nt of households report incomes in excess of SI00,000 as
compared to 4.6 percent for Florida. At the same time, Florida has nearly 40 percent more
households with incomes of less than $15,000.
Naples has some of Florida's most expensive housing and most of this housing is ne,,,,. More than
half the housing stock has been built .qince 1980. The median home value was S121,000 in 1990
but the average was S172,000. Mor, thly rents averaged S500 in 1990.
Consumer spending in Collier County in .recent years clearly reflects the market's unique
demographics. Inmig~tion creates 'm enormous demand for. building materials and home
fm'~is!~ings. Home related spending .o,.':n. prises 16 percent of retail sales, over 60 percent greater
than He state. Clothing and deparm~;.o.t store sales run ten percent more than the state share and-
sig-nificantly greater for small shops, Restaurant sales comprise only a slightly greater share of
consumer spending. Visitors boost lodging receipts to more than two and a half times that of the
tourist rich state.
A lower portion of consumer spending suggests that residents are spending outside the local
market. Medical care services are the most notable. Despite the disproportionately larger number of
senior citizens, health care spending runs more than 20 percent below the state average.
On the surface, there are many positive aspects of the Naples' economy. Naples is regularly among
the top two or three Florida markets !n terms of employment growth. This is not likely to change.
However, this job growth is almos, t entirely concentrated in services, retailing and financial
services. Despite cyclical swings, consmaction is growing. Nonetheless, the MSA has a
consistently high average annual unemployment rate. Manufacturing is small and largely
unchanged.
A closer examination surfaces some notable weaknesses and associated risks. Both the strengths
and weaknesses reflect the market's history as a winter tourist destination and upper income retiree
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2
Economic Basa
h'aven. Naples has other attributes that may be less obvious. It is relatively small and
geographically isolated. This sug?¢sts lhat local production may be limited to .specific local needs
and that many goods and services ,,All be provided from producers and venders flora outside the
market. For Naples to sell local',, r;roduced goods elsewhere, they will need to cc. ncentrate on
products where transportation cost.-, :u'e Iow relative to value.
Services and retailing dominate tt, e Naples employment base. Services account for 36.3 percent of
the work. force and is the large> ,:~, ',.,3r. Despite the large relative size, it is only abot~.t six percent
greater than the share of Flon(i... -.'.::" .e sector. The real significance is that d'..~ io~'~gi,tg industry
m-.&es up about 18 percent .'t' ,5::' ,e:'vice jobs, nearly three times that of Floe'ida'.; !odging
industry. Retailing jobs in Co;!,,." C'ot, nty are 30 percent larger than the state. Finance, insurance
and real estate is another large I,',.. '4 industry, but this sector is not as large as the dem,.,graphics and
growth might otherwise sugge.,, x.~q:e, iesale trade employment is a noticeably smaller part of the
co:,nomy. The distribution o! ?., ,.~. ,.. ,.,nly half as important as for the state and st0~ds in sharp
contrast to the much larger reta;~. ,.-', :~r. Obviously, other markets are handling the d~stribution of
goods into and throughout Cr, qi,...Zc.,.~nry.
Cc.,',strucfion employment is a~,.;t~ ..- ,:ctor that is large. Almost 14, percent of the ,,vc, rkforce is in
the building trades, very close t,", .'?,'.c'; times the state average. This large share imparts a great deal
of cyclicality to the Naples eeo,, ,~r~,~.'
Manufacturing is the least repJ~'5.,..,ed sector in the Naples economy. The 2,200 manufacturing
jobs comprise.just three percen: .,( ,.'.h: local workforce. This compares to eight percent for Florida
v.qd about 16 percent for the n:'r:,,r ~,VSat industry there is mostly serves the local o'.,:~strucufion
ma,:ket and the f'u'ms are gee.~,~.;~.. small. Only about five percent of th= mm,ufac, ruring firms
employ more than 50 worker. :~5 ~:':.: sectors where there are details, printing and publishing lead
with about 700 jobs. Building ,. ~a;.~, :als, especially concrete, is the second largest. Transportation
equipment has more than ter, .,'~, :cra of the manufacturing employment base. The boat building
sector may be the leading some:: of :;ales to other markets. There is also a small fabricated metals
and industrial equipment workf,','ce.
The Economic Base
Every local economy has a definable structure. This structure starts with what are called 'basic'
industries, which provide the ev,:~c, mic engine for the area. Supporting the basic industries are
secondary industries that supply things directly to the basic industries; and support businesses, like
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3
Economic Base
supermarkets, ,.hat supply both the basic and secondary industries. Collectively, these industries
comprise a community's economy.
Collier County has a 'single point' economy: wealthy elderly retirees and seasonal residents and
visitors. Fo,' all intents and purposes, they drive the o.,unry's economy. The majority of the
county's economy, with the exception of the large agn. cultural segment and a very small
manufacturit, g and business segment, is directly dependent ,an this base. This type of economy is
highly dep~'~dent on population growth for economic growth. Collier's population has grown by
100,000 people over the last 15 years and is expected to gcow by an equally impressive, 100,000
people over the next 15 yea. rs. Thus the base industry - affluent retirees - is expected to expand.
.
* A g~c~ltur~
The Collier County portion of the Bureau of Economic Analysis report, Personal Income by
Source ant! Earnings by Industry, provides some insight into understanding the scope of impact
that Coltle~.'s ,.tr, ique population has on its economy. Taale 1 provides a breakout on all the
personal income received in the county in 1994.
Table 1 Collier County
Personal Income by Major So,:rce - 1994
(O00s)
Amount %
Net Earnings by place of residence 52, ~02,356 42.2%
Dividends, Interest and Rent 2,518,181 46.2%
Transfer Payments (SSN cig) 631,973 11.6
Total Personal Income $5,452,519 100.0%
Source: Regional Information Syxtem, US Bureau of Economic Analyzi$, 1996.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4
Economic Base
This table clearly illustrates the impact of investment tn. come on the county. Almost fifty-eight
percent (57.8%) of all the personal income in the county t:i received from these sources. The $3.2
billion that comes into the local economy from invev, ment,~ :md transfer payments has the same
positive economic impact on the local county that z, Sal. ur~l pl,mt would produce. By contrast, the
county's other basic employer, agriculture, produced only 2.1 percent of all personal income in
1994.
Total Personal Income
Total personal income in Collier County has risen from $1.08 billion in 1980 to 55.:~5 billion in
1994. while per capita income rose from $12,298 in lgR.';.' t;, $30,906 in 1994. The county's per
capita income is approximately 40 percent higher that, t}~e. 'J.$. as a whole, and reflects the high
concentration of wealthy households. The growth in pe~ capita income during the 1980s outpaced
the rate of inflation, but during the 1990s has grown at about the same rate.
When total personal income is separated into its key components, it is easy to see the collective
impact of the county's wealthy households.
Table 2 Collier County
Components or Total Personal Income
1970
Net Earnings I 55.0%
Dividends, Interest and Rentl 36.5%!
Transfer Payments I 8.5%
100.0%
Source: R£1S/BEA. 1996
1980 ] 19¢0
48...0%1 41.5~
39.0%1 42.4,z
13.8%] 11).1%
100.0%1 100.0%
1994
1994 i U.S. I Florida
42.2%1 67.3%1 57.8%
100.0%1 100.0%1 100.0%
Table 2 illustrates the difference these wealthy households have on the economy. Net earnings
from people (including proprietors) only made up 42.2 percent of total personal income, which is
very low when compared to the U.S. as a whole, or ¢,,en Florida, which has a relatively high
concentration of retirees. In addition, this table spotlights that much of the income is coming from
investments, rather than transfer payments (like social secarity). With the decline in interest rates,
investment income also declined slightly over this period, which produced the slight decline in the
overall strength of this sector within the economy.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5
Economic Bast
Households
An examination of the county's household patterns provides additional evidence of its base
economy. As Table 3 illustrates, the county has more wealthy households than non-wealthy when
compared to the state and country as a whole.
Table 3 Collier County
Household Wealth 1996
Household Wealth i Colller I Percent I U.S. I Florida
,Under S25,000 21,747 t 29% [" 37%1 34%
525.5o,ooo 6,070
.550-100,000 10,4391 1.~%[- ..... 15%1 16%'
$ I00-250,000 8,96a I 9.5%, 23%t 25%
i25°'5°°'°°° i 5-I,%! 11%
Median Household Wealth , S 63.860 t S 63.680
fiource: Claritax, Inc., 1996. ~ [
The county's med/an household wealth was 55 percent greater than Horida's and 39 percent
greater than the national median.
A comparison of the county's age structure also spotlights the high concentration of elderly
households in the county. Table 4 breaks out the county's households by age group and compares
them to Florida and the U.S.
Table 4 Collier County
Household by Age or Householder in 1996
Collier I U.S. I Florida
I Number I PercenL_l_Percent I Percent
Total 76,022 ...... [
,.Under 25 2,809 a%[ .... 5% 5%
25 to 45 22,590 t ...._3_0~oj_ 42% 36%
45 to 65 22,885 30-701 30% 39%
65 to 80 21,157 I __28':/o-'] 17%i 22%
Over 80 t 5.581 7%1 6%i 7%
Source: Claritas, Inc., 1996. J J j
As Table 4 shows, 35 percent of the county's households are headed by someone over 65, versus
23 percent for the U.S. ant'/29 percent for Florida.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program ' ' 6
Economic Base
Table 5 displays house?,old income ranges, which are closer to the national average, although the
percentage of househelcls within Collier County in the lowest income range is lower and the
households in the highest range larger than the U.S. baseline.
Table 5 Collier County
Household by Income tn 1996
Totai 7~,022 ~
Under 325 "O.~ ~. 1._.5_~_7._
S_25-SO,OC& ..........
s 5 o-___7.~./.~ ......... : .. ~
s75- 1007£__~_.. ; 5,933
Over s I ffj.ooo ! '7.692
Source: Cljrita$, /mr., 1996.
,Collier I U.S. I Florida
Percent I Percent I Pement
100%1 100%1 100%
28%1 34%1 38%
36%1 32%t 3-1%
18%i 19%: 16%
8% I 8%' 6%
10%1 7%1 6%
This combination of elderly, wealthy households have pulled all the median numbers up
accordingly. The counL'y had the highest family median income in the state in 1995 at S48,800, and
its median household income in 1996 ,,','as 538,776.
This combination of elderly households with high incomes also translates into higher expenditure
rates, which is why the county, had the highest median 'effective buying income' in the state in
1996 at 537,624.
Table 6 Collier County
Effective Buying Income (EBI) in 1995
Effective B,.,ying I rercentage of Households b
Income I EBI Orou_p...~
. S 10-20,0C_)_'0__ __.! .... 1 !.7%
S 20- 3_5/xX) .... .'. ........ 22.3%
S35-50,000 ......... 20.3%
Over S50.000 i 39.1%
Source: Sales &Mark. etin~ Marua~entent . 1995.
Note: Both the Effective buying Income and Sales Per Capita figures for the county may be
affected by the high incidence of seasonal residents/visitors who flock to the county during the
winter season (Novem~r. April) and swell the cour~ty's population by 30 percent or more. Thirty
percent of the area's housing units are held for seasonal use, so the winter season obviously has a
major impact on the county's economy.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 7
Ill IIII I III I II I I IIII I n ~ ~ ~ ~,
Economic Base
Businesses
The county has no 'major employers' who are not directly related to serving t:s la.;..;e, affluent
retiree, seasonal, and tourist population. With the exception of agriculture, there are no other basic
industries nor were there any identified industry clusters found within the cou,ry.
As Table 7 illustrates, small sized companies predominate. Companies wit?. icy, o' uhan tea
employees make up 80 percent of all the companies in the county. Only thsee per:erie of all
companies have more than 50 employees.
Industry
Ag'r'icultm'e
,Mining
Construction
.Manufacturing
Transportation & Publir I k;litiefl
Wholesale Trade
Table 7 Collier County
Business Size by Employment
Number of Employees - 199._._.:3 _ .
1-9 10-49 50-249 ' Over 250
Total Employees Employees Employ:es En ~,Iovees
262
885
180
211
2291 27
71 2
7161 151
1291 a2
165i 42
2621 46
1,151[ 373
76~ I 109
311
Retail Trade * 1,616:
Finance, Insurance & Real Es,ate 86,
Serv/ces I 2,137
Unclassified I 74
1,761 I 292
711 3'
4; 2
__~ 1_.2 ..... 1 ....
I? I
7a 10
Total:
I 6,571 5,255 1,087 211 I 15
Percentage: I 100%1 80% 17% 3%! 0'7o:
Source: Coum? Buxintss Patterns, 1996.
The county also has a high percentage of working proprietors in its workfo,ce, which in 1994
made up almost twenty percent (19.8%) of the overall workforce, versus the la ;:,:r,;en,. o.~ state and
national levels. This is another strong indicator of the county's small business orientation.
Agriculture
Agriculture was a major component of the county's economy. Citrus, vegetableq, ornamentals and
beef carrie collectively accounted for $258 million in sties in FY 1995, with 302,704 acres in
production. Unfortunately, due to structural changes in the international markerplac,:, a~cultural
'' ' 8
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Base
sales have been on the decline since F~' 1990 ,,'hen there were S283 million in sales. With NAFrA
opening American markets to Mexicav cege:ables and fruit, it is likely that the lower wage based
portions of the agriculture industry will coofir, ue to decline. Table 8 illustrates these changes.
Tab!¢ 8 Collier County
Value of A~riculture Sales and Acres in Production
Commodity
Tomatoes
.
Cucumbers
Watermelons
Potatoes
Green Beans
Gladiolus
Citrus
Beef or Ca~¢
~ 1994-95 I 19 0-91
^:.'eaee ; Sales I Acreage Sales
; __~TN.o sl~l.5~).oooI ~ S ~560o0000
' ',).,:,' '.~5373000001 2200 S 16500000
.5 ooo ooo I 25 500
95o_!3. t 500 ooo !~L_3oo
Ornaments I 1.5.,,,
To~s ! 302.704 257.656.07.~ I _89.-,~0 ' 282.904.000
~ Collier Coura¥. U~ivee$im of Floeida Extension Services. 1995.
S 3 ~-: 5 000
N/A
S 750 000.
S aa 404 000
S 2 500 000.
3 441 07-I I 230 53-1 S 4 975 000.
8,015,000 I 1.506, S 7,530,000
Employment
Total private earnings ,,,,'/thin the county have risen from S519 rn/llion in 1980 to S2.3 billion in
1994. Separating private earnings by ;ndustry. into the percentage of total private earnings that
each industry sector earns with,., t]q~ 'c: '. ,:o,;umy. can provide some insight into local economic
activity. Table 9 illustrates these percentages and compares them with U.S. and Florida averages.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
~ 9
Economic Base
Table 9 Collier County
Private Earnings by Industry as a Percentage or All Earnings
Bv lndustrv
Construction
Manufacturing
Tr-,u-m/Communication & Public Utilitizs
~c~:~J c Trade
+ I ~ I Comparison - 1994
1970 19gO I 1990 1994 T u.s. I Flnrida
~ Trade , ~ 17.2%i 15.3'ol I$.6%I 9.7%1
Finance. Insurance & Real Estate ......, 19.3%~ 9.3%1 10.2%1 9.---~1 7.5%1 3.1%
~ 'i ,,t ~: 4 ,, I *, _~,:i~zl
C,o,,emm~t "-.;' ' 8.6'cI 10.1%; 10.4'ol 10.3%1 16.2'o!
,o,=, -: ,oo.o o, ,oo.o o, ,oo.o%: t
Source: Rerl'ona! Economic IM'ormahOn S~,;tem, Bureau o_/EconomicAnMyti$. 1996.
As Table 9 shows, agriculture earnings make up a higher percentage of county earnings then
national or state earnings. : : ,,
Mm.n,:, only makes up a small portion of employment at all levels.
Construction, which is a main,,."/ of the local economy is over twice U.S. and state levels.
Manufacturing, Transportation/Communication/Public Utilities, and wholesale trade are ail fas
below national and state level: Retail, Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, and services, reflecting
CoLlier's unique economy are far above, and government was below state and national levels.
Looking at earnings over time, a=m"iculrure has risen over time. Mining, following statewide trends
has declined. Construction has declined over time, while manufacturing, T/C/P.U. and wholesale
trade have remained relatively ,:o,tstant over dme. Retail trade and Finance/Insurance/Real Es,ate
have also remained fairly constant, while services, reflecting the overall shift in thc national
economy have grown significantly. Government has remained constant.
Table 10 provides the breakout of employment by industry and tracks it by year from 1991 through
1994. As this table displays, overall employrnent grew from 72,645 in 1991 to 79,855 in 1995.
This table also illustrates the dtp in employment in 1991 and 1992, as Collier County felt thc
effects of the national recession. In 1991 the local unemployment rate hit 7.9 percent before
peaking a~ 9.4 percent in 1992, and slowly declining as the economy recovered. The
unemployment rate in 1995 was 6.8 percent which is still higher than the state's.
Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am ~ 10
Economic Base
Table 10 ColHer County
Employment by Year
Industry 1991 1992 [ 199,3 I 1994 J 1995 [1991 to 1995
Construction 6,411
I i 71 I ~
65 I 58 5.a 351 t3a'
5.657 I 6.317 6.92,I 7.2061
Manu/'actur[ng ..... 2,025 I 2 018
Tra. ns/Communk, ation & Public Utilitie: 1 914 ~
Whole~ale Trac:e I 650 1,7a2 I !.645
Fin~ce I~d,_;L~, ~nce & Real Estate ----t -. 4 512~
Services _ . ! ~ 20.71a I 22 102
C~vern. ment ~- 6.785 ~
Total ~72,a72 I 76,3al
795
113
323
7
29
2aa51 ~ 3 247
7.Baa I 1,059
1 913
I 790
a 670
23 115
7,562
78.218 79.854 I 7,208
Source: Flortda Deoartment of Labor a,..d
As Table 9 illusu'ates, while thc county added 7,208 jobs in the five year period, nc.t all scclors
grew equalI,, Overall the heaviest drop in employment over this period was in agriculture which
lost 1,628 .job.;, while the county's population growth pushed up construction, retail, services, and
government employment. Only 13 manufacturing jobs have been added in the last five years.
Wi~n a nurr,~r of these overall industry sectors there were also changes. Within the agriculture
sector, theft ,,.vas a big drop in jobs in crops, which was partially offset by increases in veterinary.
and genera~ avimal services and landscapers. Within the Finance/lnsurance/Re..'fl Estate industr?'.
depository ~m, tirutions lost jobs (as part of the ongoing industry consolidation) while security
brokers, ~n>t~rance and real estate expanded. Within the services sector, hotels and consultants
(architects, engineers, accountants & management) all lost jobs, while health care and business
services ~e,~,.
Reflecting the seasonal nature of the local economy, employment also rises and fills over the year.
Average employment in 1995 peaked in December at 110 percent of the yearly average before
dropping aown into the August summer low point when overall employment is at only 86 percent
of the average. A~ciculture, retail trade and services are the sectors most subject to seasonal
swings.
Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am I 1
Economic Base
Monthly Employment
One other note on er;~ployment: when comparing average salarie~ between Collier and Lee
counties, the av.,'.,,~,~, wages paid across the employment spectrum are almost always higher in
Collier County.
1992 Census of Business
The 1992 Census or' Business also provides some insights into the county's economy. The census
of b:~siness is tatceo every five years and provides general information on the types of business and
their sales over ante.
The 1992 business :.ensus found that the county's retail establishments, which grew from 892
estaNishments in 1',82 to 1,529 in 1992, had sales per capita of $I0,824 and an average payroll
pm employee, of $12,735. Table l i show~ these figures. These sales and salary numbers were
significantly higher than national, statewide, and even neighboring Lee County's numbers.
(':oilier County Economic Diversity Program 12
Economic Base
Table I1 Collier County
Retail Service Statistics . 1992
Location
Sales Per
Capita
Collier
Florida ~S ~
United States I S 7.429
Percent of i Payroll Per i Percent or"
Collier E m,~p,.l o v e e Collier
I_~_.S, .L2.~7SS I
~9~--~. $ I I~903 '; 93'~o
81% s
69 7i--' ,2.,o8
Source: 1992 Census of Business · 1996.
As this table reveals, the county's retail sales and payroll per employee exceed national levels.
Within the wholesale trade sector, the county lags behind state and national averages.
Table 12 Collier County
Wholesale Trade Statistics . 1992
I Sales Per Percent of I Payroll Per Percent of
Location Capita Collier $ Emptovee Collier
Collier I S 3,314
Florida
9,832
I s 2~.5.43
103%1 S 24 86g
297% i S '~ ~4 ~,
384%~ S 29.017
115%
12-1%
United States I S 12.741 135%
Source: I992 Census of Business · 1996. I ;
At Table 12 displays, the county's wholesale trade sector, much like Lee County's, primarily
serves its own market.
The county's service industry had higher receipts per capita than any of the other areas but had a
lower payroll per employee than any of the other areas. Table 13 shows these numbers.
Table 13 Collier County
Service Industries . 1992
{ Sales Per I Percent of
Location J Cax, lta , Collier
'Collier ~
Lee 84%
United States 80%1
Source: 1992 Census of Susines$ . 1996. J
Payroll Per
i Percent or
Em£1ovee
Collier
~.~_.. 18,0481
$ 21C9.17 J 115%
~ 2 3 .~'8'-[ 124%
~ ==~==~'=~'"~- 13
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Base
Tax Base
Table 14 presents the percentage of' the overall assessed valuation by major use category and
compares the county with the state, Lee County and Dural County, which have more traditional
economies.
Table 14 Collle. r County
Percentage of Assessed Valuation by Land Use Type - 1994
! ~'lorlda I Collier I Lee I Duval
Residential t 66.0%2 17.? 'raj. ~ 54.3%
Commercial ..... ~ 15.0%1 ..... 1'-0- ~';~'~ i
....... ~ 3.6%1 ~'6%t,i 12.4_...4~ 1o.o%
Industrial
2.6%1 6.9%i
A~cultu. r¢ i 1.7%[ 1. ,5 ?o t 0.6%'[ 0.3%
lnstitutionm ] 2.7%~ .... ' ~*, ' ,_
-. ~'t 2.1%1 5.1%
,Miscellaneous J 11.0%1 7.3 %J 5.8%J 14.3%
Source: BEBR. 1995 Statistical Abstract. J J
As this table illustrates. Collier County's perce,tage of its overall assessed valuation within
I
residential uses is one of the highest in the state. The co mty s residential property owners pay a
higher share of local property taxes than they do in other areas of the state.
~ ~ 14
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Base
Key
Findings
Rapid growth is inevitable. The county added 100,000 residents during the last 15 years
and will add another 100,000 residents over the next 15 years.
The county has a single point economy, one that is focused on meeting the needs of its
affluent consumer market.
Most of the county's businesses are small, and there are a larger number of sole
proprietors.
A major econorrfic problem is the seasonal nature of the local economy, which peaks a~
115 percent of a~,erage employrnent in the busy ,,,.'inter season and falls by 30 percent to
85 percent of the average during the summer.
The. market's relative small size (under 1 million people) suggests that key, locally
consumed services and products will continue to be imported, since economies of scale
will be difficult to achieve.
The continued influx of high income retirees suggest that the construction, medical,
serv/ces and retail sector will continue to grow.
The county's geographically isolated location suggests that production for the nonlocal
market will be limited, except for goods where transportation costs are Iow in relation to
their value.
The improved transportation links make the county more attractive for air and auto
visitors, and easier to utilize goods and services produced elsewhere.
The highly seasonal and service-oriented economy means the majority of fl~ture jobs in
retail/services will be Iow-paying job opportunities that exist for only the winter tourist
season.
· Ag'ricultural products/food processing may be an overlooked opportunity.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program ...... 15
Economic Asre.,sment
Part Two: Economic Assessment
Introduction
The purpose of this section is to assess the county's e<Jsti, g economy in light of ongoing u-ends
and changes in the overall US and Florida ".¢onomie.~. Fids vril~ ,.hen set the stage for establisi:ing
what type ,of economic diversification ~rugt~m ,v;ll k:.st rncct the co,.,nty's needs.
Summary of Part One Findings
Rapid growth is inevitable. The county is projected to add 100,000 new residen:.:; over
the next 15 years.
The county has a 'single-point' economy, focused on meeting the needs of n.~ a/'f!uent
consumer market.
The local economy is highly seasonal. Average employment peaks at 115
average during the winter season then .lro~,' by 39 petcer~ to 85 percent o1'
during the summer.
The local economy is als'.) vulnerable to cyclical recession.
Agriculture is in long-term decline.
Most of the county's businesses are small and there, are a large numbc~ of ~ole
proprietors. Many of these businesse.~ are vulnerable to national chains that m~. now
moving into the county.
The majority o~ ,he .fmu, c joba .'.re..~t¢4 in d~:: :tu're~t economy will be lov.,
seasonal retail and service jobs.
Healthcare and construction should also grow.
Trends in Florida's Economy
The county is part ora larger state and national economy and changes in the larger level will 'affect
the local economy. There are a number of ongoing economic treMs in the Florida economy ~at
will affect Collier's economy.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program ~ 1
Economic Assessment
Solid Overall Growth
· Still growing in absolute terms, but not at the boomtown 1980's rate.
· Slowdown in the number of Americans retiring, until 2010.
· Increase in the second home market.
· Structure of population slowly shifting to working age.
Defense Downsizing Will Slow
· Major downsizing accomplished.
· .~ocurement will slowly decline.
Savings and Loan Effects Gone
· Excess inventories absorbed/restructured.
· Demand for space strong.
· Return of speculative building.
Shift to Service-Based Economy Will Condnue
· Agriculture and textiles will decline (NAFTA).
· Airlines/bankin~communications will continue to consolidate.
· Growing global economy for value-added business services.
· Smaller sized companies will predominate.
· Manufacturing job growth will be slow through capitalization
production techniques.
· Exports will continue to rise.
Across industry sectors, the following trends are likely to occur:
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
· Overall the number of jobs in agriculture will decline.
· New jobs will be in veterinary, animal, and landscaping services.
and value-added
Mining
Overall jobs will continue to decline.
Construction
· Will remain strong, but grow more slowly.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Assessment
Manufacturing
· Greater investments in technology per employee will slow overall employment growth.
· Durable goods should add most of the new.jobs.
· Electronic equipment, instruments and related products, and printing and publishing arc
expected to account for 60% of all new manufacturing jobs.
Transportation, Communications and Public Utilities
· Will remain strong but grow slowly.
· New technologies are reducing employment demand.
· Trucking will add the most new jobs.
Wholesale and Retail Trade
· One quarter of all new jobs will be in trade (primarily retail trade).
· Wholesale trade employment will slow, as new computer ba',ed technologies reduce
employment demand.
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate
· Mergers ~,nd consolidations will slow overall employment growth.
· Security and commodity brokers will be fastest growing segment.
· Insurance will add the most newjobs.
Services
Fastest growing sector.
Health and business services will be strongest.
Social services will also gain.
Government
· Slow growth in employment.
· Major growth will be in prisons.
Florida lndu4try and Occupational Employment Projections 1994-2000. Bureau of Labor Market
Information. Florida Department of Labor and Employment Projections.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3
Economic Assessment
National Business Trends
General business trends, both overall and for specific industries will determine where companies
locate, or re-locate in the future.
Most companies in today's competitive environment must become low cost and high quality
producers or service providers. 'I hcse business realities axe dictating the need for and pattern of
corporate lc)cat/on activity. The 9'.zrwhelming force now motivating firms to relocate business
operations is cost reduction/cont~,i,,rncnt. Often this involves maximizing efficiency, which can be
difficult for many corporations in their exiting quarters.
Companies also view relocation as a unique window of opportunity to introduce major change in
their organizations. This can involve process re-engineering, flattening orgarfizational structures,
introducing work teams, decentr:,h:'ing decision making, and even modifying corporate culture. It
is frequently difficult to gain ma~.irnum mileage from such change in existing locations. Hence,
many £wms will move both to take advantage of locafional cost savings and realize additional
savings from fully implementing desired management changes.
Other forces which are driving companies to geographically redeploy assets are: shedding non-
core businesses; globalization; onerous state and local regulations; customer/vendor partnerships
(industry clusters); difficulties rec'cuiting a quality work:force (despite the slow economy); the need
to have maximum flexibility fo;' future growth; and new approaches required to successfully
manage people who have a different set of priorities than their predecessors.
Rapid advances in telecommunications has now made it possible to efficiently operate several small
and more manageable operations as opposed to mega facilities.These advances have also allowed a
number of industries to under'raJ,re substantial physical consolidation. This in turn has fueled
relocation. This so called churning in American industry should persist well into the future.
Additionally, there are many companies who are leaders in their industries that are searching for
new capacity. This is occurring even in depressed industries. In siting new facilities however, even
the growth fa'ms are striving for cost reductions.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4
Economic Assessment
Crucial Factors
Human resource co,~.~de,utions ,iow dominate location selection criteria in the majority of
industries. The pre-eot=m:..' .' hero:' ¢,:.:r these companies is the availability of a quality, workforce.
Gauging whether an a.t: '...~: s~ti:¢y this r.:qairement involves the examination of related data, such
as: labor force educa:. :.:,~;, 'v:ra~nrc,.-.r,: levels; the basic skills of production and clerical workers that
can be recruited at d..,z ..'.,; ,9a,,.~,; targeted wage level; computer literacy of requisite workers;
annual turnover ..rote., ,. :,., r,~,,--,I,:,, po,.,inons, daily absentee rates; work ethic and productivity.
ratings by compm'a'..)lc e~'oot,: ~ :.,';, and, educational quality indicators.
Most companies seek ?..'sa....,/here there is a minimum critical mass of requisite skilled and technical
labor. Sometimes there :s '~' additional requirement for industry specific skills.
Once a company, is ce',tMe,.:, that a .,-,.ffficient pool of quality labor is available, the next most
important concern ¢.,":.?,r,e.', maJ,o:,~er costs. Firms are seeking locations characterized by
moderate wage str,:,.., .~: '. ~r,d "-'",Fie. reserves of well qualified labor. In short, the goal is to
achieve maximum val,.~¢ vt. c'.,ery human resource dollar expended.
The paramount labo'c ,'c~.' ~.cn'.pone,,t is hourly wages or annual salaries for respective occupations.
An incoming fh-m 2, m '~,. c:.~ce~v.'_.d with the average hire-in rate for the positions in question.
Other prirne variables a...-'~ r:~.:.di~al in~,urance, other fringe benefits, workers' compensation, and
workweek length.
For high tech, corp:;r"ac ~eadquarters, and R&D companies the ability to attract and relocate
professional talent ~o,:: :~rv'.~ ;~b,' ,:ountry is the most important criteria. This capability is often
dictated by both an. e.re'.-: :;.~..xl.;t'/oi' life arid its public image. Pivotal quality of life concerns for
today's transferees .~:'.'. ,~?£,~:dable hr:using, ~e quality of public education, spousal employment
opportunities, corfu;rotc- d~.,,ar~ces, crime, recreational opportunities and the quality of the natural
environment.
These priorities ca~, also wclude the local presence of highly regarded technical and business
universities. Excellent air service, preferably including nonstop connections and international
flights, is generally high on the criteria list for these kinds of operations.
After the human resource factors, the following locational determinants often surface as strongly
influential:
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5
£conomit: Assessment
Other business costs, such as electric power, occupancy and local taxes
Domestic and international air service
Available office and industrial space
Telecommunications
Sufficient infrastructural capacity, especially roads
Intermodal mil and freight services
Reasonable state regulations, especially environmental
Fast permit ap!:'r~val process
Air quality attainment
State and local government incentives
Absence of earthquake and destructive storm potential.
Back Office and Financial Services
A number of factors have conwibuted to slowing office location activity; specifically: lower
occupancy costs at (or near) existing sites; excess office space capacity, creating diffic~.flt
disposition; favorable la0.or supply surpluses, with low wage inflation pressures; lower
sector earnings, creating clJfficulties justifying one-time relocation costs; and the more immed:ate
commiu"nent of capital for equipment upgrades or new purchases.
For back office location projects, the typical relocation objectives have focused on: management's
desire for change in operations and/or delivery of services; access to higher quality labor, or the
need for cost control.
Under these scenarios, the critical location screening issues become labor and occupancy cost,
labor supply and available skills, the selection of efficient buildings, telecommunications support
and superior educational systems.
Light Manufacturing and High Technology
Location activity for high technology and light manufacturing is either pressure driven (need for
cost reduction) or opportunity driven (expansion related).
Industry sectors that are critically impacted by pressure driven factors include: Computer
Manufacturing, Aerospace, Defense, and Biotechnology and Healthcare. Ail of these industries
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 6
Economic Assessment
have been downsizing for various reasons. Selected companies in this sector, however, should
experience moderate growth with the emergence of new drugs, gr=ater operating cost efficiencies
and growing foreign markets.
Oppommity driven industries include:
Computer Software and Servicing: Industry statistics show 50 percent of computer
related revenues will derive from software sales and design. These f'urns are now
s,~ccessfully pursuing global markets.
Indusu-ial Electronics/Processing Automation: Computer integrated manufacturing will
gain increasing importance within future product development. This trend will favor
computerized numerical controls, robotics, electronic sub-assemblies, laser technology,
optical scanning and software development.
Fabricated Rubber Parts/Plastic Parts & Fabrication: Recycling programs continue to
support various industry sectors. These firms include a diverse mix of small and large
operations, suitable for virtually any size community.
Telecommunications: Growth products include radio communication equipment,
detection systems and all forms of wireless corm'nunication (computer networking,
cellular phones). Market expansion is both domestic and international.
Medical Equipment: Selected industry sectors are growing, particularly products that
offer less invasive surgical procedures (e.g. laser surgical equipment).
Food Processing: Industry trends are shifting from consolidation to modernization, with
new plant construction expected. Positive influences on the p~ocessed food markets
include higher household incomes, demand for health-related foods and new access to
foreign markets.
Many of the above industries will ultimately benefit from the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA), particularly those services and products that bring automation and high
technology to Mexican business. Favored industries will include electronics, computer soft'.vare
design, communications and scientific instruments.
=== ~ 7
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Ecol~ora[c A$$e$$rae~l
Reta/] and Ser~ces
The major structural changes now going on in the retail and personal services sector of the
economy revolve around business franchising and the movement to large 'category ldller' stores.
The rise of business franchising has been a rapidly growing phenomenon in America. Franchises
now make up 30 percent vt' ~i! retail and personal services businesses with. in the U.S. and this is
expected to rise to 50 p,:tc':.qt of all business over the next 20 years.The footloose nature of
American society., combined with the franchise's inherent advantages in establishing a brand name,
advertising, management and buying power, give this type of operation a distinct long-term
advantage in the marketplace over local single store operators.
The 'category killers', Home/Office Depot, Toy's R Us, Books-A-Million, Circuit City, etc. focus
on one aspect of retail, then offer low price/high volume alternatives to local specialty stores. This
trend, coupled with the rise in super-sized supermarkets, which have drugstores, banks, photo
processing, flower stores and cud shops are all leading to an implosion of retail space into these
big boxes (60-80,000 s f.). ti'.at typically do S200/s.f. in sales versus the S100/s.f. in sales at a
traditional neighborhood shopping center.
Collectively, these =ends are sounding the death knell for many small, independently owned
businesses that cannot compete on price and are unable to compete on service or provide a specialty
niche that the national chain stores cannot provide.
ECONOMIC STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
The purpose of this section is to assess the county's economic strengths and weaknesses in light of
general business requirements. While every business has different requirements, there are six
major areas that drive business locational decisions:
1. Access to markets
2. Exisdng business mix
3. Labor ava/lability
4. Business costs
5. Ava/lability of building/sites
6. Quality of life
Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.re'am 8
Economic Assessment
The type of company determines which of these six key factors will have the most influence in
business locational decisions. For e×a,nple, a large corporation doing business across the country
will seek to locate near a major reglonal airport, llke Atlanta, Chicago or Denver, while
companies that are regional in natu,',' v,'ill f,ollow a similar strategy, just a smaller scale. A good
example is Merrill-Lynch, which ~' currently concentrating its 'back-office' functions in
Jacksonville, which has an existing. ::,tong cluster of similar businesses, a large trained labor
supply, reasonable qaality of life. ant :,,~.,:;t important to this type of busine.~s: lower labor and
business c>sts than the Northeast. lt: ,.'orporate headquarters, on the other h~'.nd, is located in
Princeton, NJ, where the high quality o~' life outweighs all other locational decisions.
COLLIER COUNTY SCORECARD
1. Access to Markets
Ce
The county's remoteness is in many r ,0eot; part of its popularity in the exclusive residential real
estate market. The. opening of ~,-7.~ o Fart Lauderdale and the expansion of the Regional
l. ntemational Airport have improved .'.v .;ess -omewhat, but the county is still a long way from most
major markets. Business travel, alth,:agh constantly improving, is still difficult and expensive.
While some transportation savings car, ")e achieved d'trough backhauling, the county will remain a
difficult market to operate from.
2. Existing Business blix
Ce
The county's current business mix is ;~redominantly small businesses almost totally focused on
serving the local residential con~un',:r market, with little in the way of externally focused
companies. While the local medical and qnance industries have some potential for forming industry
clusters in the future, Collier county i'., local services oriented economy.
3. Labor Availability
D
Not only is the local labor force small hy regional standards, the vast majority of the county's
employees are clustered in low skill/Iow wage occupations. The availability of a skilled worlcforce
was cited by the county's CEO's as tN. county's biggest business problem at all levels.
'== Collier Cot,,'.')' Economic Diversity Program 9
Economic Assessment
Wages
It is generally estimated that manpower costs account for approximately 70 percent of all business
costs, so labor costs are an important component of ail business costs. As Table 1 di,'play:q in
almost all the job specialties tracked by the I)eparvanent of Labor, wage rates are higher ;x,. C)')llier
County than in neighboring Lee County. As:;uming a standard 40 hour work week, this wage
differential ranges from one to three thousand dollars per year.
'===== ~ ~ 10
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Assessment
Table I Collier County
Comparison of Hourly Earnings - Lee and Collier Counties
I995
__ Oc_c 9.q? lic. Collier County
Office
Accoun~ts
Accoundn~ Cle.~k~.
Administrative .AssistanL~
Customer Sera. ce
Clerical Su~_~
Office M~agers __
Purc ha sin t_6_g.".n_~.~ ......
Receptionists .......
Secretaries
Manufacturing
Assemblers an0 FabrS,'.~to,s
Lee County._.
11.68
8.82
11.50
8.13
N/A
MedLan
S 17.31 $
$ 9.50 S
$ 9.88 S
S 10.00 S
S 11.49
$ 8.75 S 7.50
S 13.00 S i 2.25
S 12.12 S 11.53
S 7.96 S 7.00
S 9.45 S 9,02
6.25 N/A
S
Dr'afters S 13.00 NIA
S 19.00 S 10.63
First-line Producfon Sur~4rvisor's
Industrial Pr~uctJon Man__~ers
Laborers and Material
~Mechanir;s ....
Offset l~as O.Eg.E.p.t~_
.S~ R,'.c.~b'.~); 5"¢rk~
Stock Clerks
Track Drivers V.qn2L..
~ Drivers
Finance ln. zo___ror_,_c2.t fi'e,'q Estate
~erator~
~e,'~._.b_
Financial M~a~e~
Ps. Il & Tirnek¢__e..q3n. g Cierk$
;ervice ......
Cashiers
Cooks
S 22.99
Hosts and Hostes~s
$ 6.44
S 12.50
$ 16.25
S 6.00
S 11.19
1 !.00
S 12.50 S
S 7.54 S 6.25
S 6.62 S 7.00
S 10.38 S 8.88
S 7.50 S 7.00
10.80 8.65
S 15.89
$ 17.31
S 14.99
N/A
19.80 S 20.83
10.30 $ 9.20
6.25 $ 5.88
$ 8.00
7.50
$ 6.50
S
Hotel Desk Clerks ]_~
Janitors and Clec~e.,'s tS 7.2
6.24
6.50
6.00
7.50 S
Medical Assist,ts S 10.00 ~ 8.83
~red Nursez S 16.66 S 15.28
~al Technicians S 16.00 S 12.50
~Reted I S 6.00 S 5.50
Construction
~nt~rs S I1.25 S 11.00
18.75 S 17.19
Construction Managers
Construction Worke~ S 7.69 N/A
Electricians S 13.00 S ll.ll
Brick Masons $ la.00 N/A
Source: Florida Devartment ff Ernolovmtnt Securit,t. 1996.
Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am
Economic Assessment
4. Business Costs
C
Business costs are the collective cost of employees, building costs, taxes, insurance, etc. that go
into the making of the goods c~r ~ervices that a particular com~:.:,l r ;e!ls. Wki.le every company is
conscious of its costs, thc fY1:' 'ff company now determines t, ~,,. c'rjcal this is to a business. For
example, high volume, lq x, , duc. added manufacturers (VCR'.~ an; very. susceptible to these bix:
of costs, while in high value added businesses (software) these ore '~ot a cfidcal component.
Within the Southeast U.S. k,.:gio,, the county's business cost; ate highly competitive, and am
cemainly less than those ,~ th.' rmdwest ;md nomheast. However', :here are other low cost lc>cations
within Florida, including, unfortunately neighboring Lee County.
In other business cost areas, such as power, utilities, solid was:e and local business and property
taxes, Florida and Collier cot:.'~ty ~e relatively low cost in relatic;r, to other market areas across the
count'.
5. Availability of Buildings/Sites
D
More than 80 percent of al~ -ew; expanding, consolidating or felt, caring businesses desire to move
into an existing building '~,;'; ;'s '.,~fly natural. To gain permit .".0p~'ovals and build a new building
can easily t.'~ke three year'., o ~t ~,; easy to understand why bu'i~,:.::;se~; look at existing buildings.
This is especially critical in Ronda, v.'hich has a reputation for overlapping and complicated
regulations.
Although there are a fa~.r t;umbcr of Office and light indusm~, i)uildings available for rent/sale
within the county, most of these a.re very small in size, and are. r~vt able to serve anyone but small
companies. This lack of inventory certainly inhibits business exn~.nsion with the community..
In addition, the average monthly rents for office and industrial space within the county appear to be
generally higher, by several d¢liars a square foot then ot~e~' markets in Florida, especially
neighboring Lee County .~d~,',t, gh no complete inventory, of ~2,¢ county's office space market
exists, a review of the coa,~t:, '_~ ;,,vailable space would place Cias:', A suburban office space rents in
the low $20's range. Comparing the rent ranges for suburban level Class A office space, the
county has higher rental rates than the other major Florida markets.
~ ~ 12
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic
Table2 Collier Coun;~,
^veraRe Cost for Suburban Class A Orrk~ Space - 1996
- Market Cost/SF I I Mart, e~ I Cost/SF
'~acksonville S
West Palm S i 3 18
Sou.ce: Koll Real Estate Index.~ I
17 ~ I Denve~C_.i.
20l [ Ptttsbu.r~h
22
I $ 26
?3 21
' '". 21
'Esfimatexl f i I .... I
Industrial rates are similarly higher. However, the county" rental rates are not high in comparison
with other U.S. markets.
6. Quality of Life
A
The Naples MSA offers one of the highest quality of life :~,,.,Irot~,:cnts in the country, which is
why the cour:r,/continues to be a world class residentwl and ,,;uc,-3m enclave. Quality of life is
increasir~gl', ",".coming the major locational deterrvfinar~~ f ,r th, cno,,Jl:dge based industries of the
21st century
Of major concerns for businesses are the quality of the ioc. at :,chords, the crime rate, natural and
recreational resources, local infrastructure capacity (especi~Jlv ,'~ads), affordable housing and ease
of business travel. Collier County scores very high in all these meaqures.
Interviews with Local CEO's
Ms. Parker Collier, a member of the Economic Advisory Council, interview~ over 50 chief
executive offl,.:ers in a variety of businesses that represe:~: a :,.oo, cross-section of the county's
business community. The results of this survey present a [ab':f clear picture of the problems and
prospects of doing business within the county.
The CEOs felt that "quality of life" is the major economic mccmt ,e for a business to operate in the
county. They also felt that Naples is not for every bw.;ines", nor should it be. Other major points
included:
~ ....... ~~=~=='~=~ 13
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Assessment
The local governments (both city and county) are not perceived to be business friendly.
The Collier economy s}',t;uld be looked at geographically (east and west of US 41).
The need to devetc~ ,?.'mmuter roads and affordable housing so that employees can
locate within the co,.m~,~ ~,m less expensive areas).
The lack of a high q,~,~ ~:y, trained labor force for the services industries.
The lack of effecriw jo:.: training programs.
The importance o; .::;Je .y.. security and political stability in supporting quality of life.
The local busine:,s ,~,r,,~ ork is not very strong.
The lack of infrasm~,;ture, especially roads.
Collectively, these CEOs have focused on the key problems facing the business person who
wishes to expand or locate there.
The CEO's also stated that preser¢:ng the county's 'Quality of Life' was the most important thing
the county could do to foster economic growth.
Population Growth
The county is projected to add 1<'.,(.".,000 new people over the next fifteen years. The type of people
that will be. [Mng here will ha..,-: :,r, effect on the types of businesses that will opera:e within the
county. The Bureau of Econor,,Sc i'r~d Business Research (BEBR) prov:des the state's long range
population projections. Table ! ?:,wides those population projections as a percentage of total
population. As this table illustrates, unlike the rest of Florida, BEBR expects the county's
population to get older over time.
Table 3 Collier County
Population Age Structure . 1980-2005
l' t1980
Age
0.-19 I 26~
20-54 { .._4_: :7!~'
Over 55 I 33%
Source: Bureau o( Economic
1990 I ~99s I 2000
,13% 42%1 41%1 39%'~'
35% 3S%1 37%l 39%1
a~ B~d~$x Rexearch ~ Ra~e Ptoiectlo~. i995.
The percentage of the population under 20 within the county is projected to remain fairly constant
over time, while the state projects that the percentage of people over 55 will rise. This is in contrast
to Florida as a whole, where :.he s;ate expects that senior citizens as a percentage of total population
will decline slightly, as more working age households move to Florida.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 14
Economic Assessment
Applying these project/ohs to Collier County, the county will still attract the wealthy, elderly
households that are the basis of the county's economy.
As Table 4 illustrates, when comparing Collier County to state and national averages, the local
employment differences can be clearly seen. The county has a higher perceerage of its work:force in
agricultural, construction, finance/insurance/real estate, retail and services, ~eflecung the residential
consumer nature of the local market. ManufacturSng, transportation/communications/public
utilities, wholesale trade, and government make up smaller percentages, whl. a is a reflection of the
market's small size, whereby larger regions are supplying the county with gtxx:Is and services.
Table 4 Collier County
Non-Farm Employment
1994
US I Florida ~ Collier County
A___m-ic ulture/Fore st/Fish
Construction
~ l%J 2%1
!%1 .I 1%
5%[. 6%1 10%
N~anufacmrins[
~ommunication/Public Utilities ~ 13~%.~ 7%i 3%
5%~ 5% I 3.%
Wholesale T 5%1 5'7ol 2%
Retail I 17%-i' [~'~oT 22%
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate I 8.7ol ~ 10%
Ser,4ces I 30%[ .3~__.~
Government [ 15%1 i4--~ 8%
I 100% 1 100% I 100%
So_._.urct: REIS. 1996. I I ' l
Changes in Employment
When the county's employment shifts over time are examined, they provide some insight into the
changing nature of the county's economy. Looking at the years 1991 through 1994, individual
industry changes are outlined.
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing
Suffering from the effects of NAFTA, this sector lost several thousand jobs, primarily seasonal
farm workers. This job loss was offset by hundreds of new jobs being created in veterinary
services (074), and landscaping (078). Agriculture is expected to continue to decline over time with
the exception of its services component which will continue to grow.
~ 15
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Assessment
Manufacturing
This sector remains flat, losing lots of jobs in the 1991 recession. Then slowly added them back.
This sector wiJl only show modest job growth in the future, primarily focused on serving the local
economy.
Conslz'ucfion
While co'~struction jobs overall keep growing, the county lost jobs in the bener paying heavy
construction (16) sector during this period. This may have been the result of external competition.
This sector will continue to grow as the county grows.
Transportation, Communications & Public Utilities
Employment in this sector n:mained relatively fiat over time, while modest job growth across the
sector was offset by job losses in transportation (41 & 42). The transportation job losses will
probably continue as more efficient supply systems become the norm. The public utiLities area (49)
also lost some jobs, which are a natural out growth of increased computerization.
Wholesal: Trade
This sector saw modest growth over the period, although u-adc in a number of areas lost jobs.
Again, this appears to be the result of store consolidation in the retail industry, and of businesses
growing ability to provide goods from other areas. This area is also expected to only grow slightly
in the future.
Retail Trade
This sector added almost 3,000 jobs over the time period. However, even within this sector there
were job losses, which would reflect national trends of larger, less labor intensive stores (Home
Depot, Circuit City, etc.) replacing smaller local businesses. These trends will continue, although
population grovah continue to create retail jobs.
' "16
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Economic Assessment
Finance, Insurance and Real Estate
This sector only saw modest growth during this period. Whilc insurance and mai estate grew, thc
finance sector saw the loss of over 300 jobs and the bank consolidations continued. This pattern
wiU continue into the future. The county would also seem to be a prime target for financial and
brokerage services, but job growth within this area has been very modest.
Services
While the services industry added almost 2,000 jobs during the period, a number of sub-sectors
performed differently. The biggest gain was in healthcare (80), which added over 800 jobs. The
biggest loser was hotels/motels whic',~ shed 816jobs during the same time period, largely through
management efficiencies. Of partic;,lar concern were the job losses in engineering, accounting
research and management (87) where, the county lost 400 high paying jobs. These job losses
would also seem to be an indicator that larger outside companies are now beginning to successfully
compete in the CoLlier market.
Population growth will continue to fuel job growth in this sector. Healthcare should continue to
lead in job creation.
17
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Program Deve;opment
Part Three: Program Developme,~t
Introduction
The purpose of this section is tc, utilize the information developed in the aqaly~;~s xez,'iz., ..; ,~.~
report to fashion an effective .:,.'ganizafional response. To do this we will :l,ift ~o~. -. .... .! .r::
identification to program devel.~?ment.
Summary of Part Two Findings
· The county's basic econom~ - affluent retirees, seasonal visitors and tou~,,'~ - will co.~rinu,:
grow; although the count) '.rill grow slightly older as the existing re:&!en~.:' age.
· The county can expect to attract 100,000 new residents over the next fifteev years.
· The size of this growth has the potential to create serious growth m-tr,,~g,~,.'nent probie,'c,~ ~r
the county that could dama~;,~, the county's image as a select residenfiat
· The county's small busine.~.s community is being adversely affected b? ~ational
that can now enter the Naples market area.
· Under current trends the c~:,,nty will continue to lose many small busit~c:,se: axed ',~,ell
jobs, replacing them with i,3w paying, no benefit, seasonal employment ie r,,-r~l and ~.-..!vi
· A survey of the county'~ CEO's found that the lack of a well traine,'~ la,~r force ',.,,;
becoming an impediment to providing the business service levels that ace ~. Naples' ra-ademo~k.
· Health care will be the strongest growing sector of the local economy a:.,d offer:, me
the opportunity to establish a key industry cluster and improve the quality of care availa~',l.' to
the county's residents.
Collier County -C0n6mic ive'rsity ' '
Program Development
Thc county is not a business location for all comp;~rucs, nor should it be. However there are a
number of county residents who would like to mt '.,e the;r small, prestigious companies to thc
county, yet are unable to do so for a variety of re.a.,on$
Future Prognosis
Thc future prognosis for the county's basic economy ;¥.;,ear'; s.rrong. The U.S. economy is healthy
and will centinue to grow, although it will still be s~$:'~,:' ~, · ~c~..:al national recession. Florida will
continue to see slxong, real growth and will add mor~ ;.'.' ,:.,~' ~ ,,~'c thc coming years then any other
state in the country. Collier County is also expect, e( :, '.-~. stxer,g continued growth in its basic
economy over ~:c next 15 years, as it adds anot~c; ~$0,000 permanent residents and perhaps
another 30,000 seasonal residents.
The county's strong growth sectors will continue to be retail and services, which have Iow wage
and benefit structures. The hospitality, construction .',nd :L~- coedical sectors will also grow.
Why Economic Diversification?
There are a variety of reasons why communities engage t," economic diversification. They include:
enhancing property values, reducing residential ptc,~,..-.a;' rmxcs, recession-proofing the local
economy, incre~!ng local business and year-round c:nplo?~ent opportunities for their residents,
attracting new bu;inesses, or some combination ,cc ~I ::' t:;-..r, reasons. Because each community
is different, eat:: ;~as its own community goals, .:,= ~..c':; t;.'-._: :.,.~ own strengths and weaknesses
from an econorxic diversification standpoint; to be succ,~ssful, each community must develop its
own custom-tailored strategy.
How?
There arc two basic rules for successful economic diversification:
Rule One: Build on your strengths; and
Rule Two: Minimize your weaknesses.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2
Program Development
Economic Strengths and Weaknesses
When seen from a economic diversification viewpoint, every comm,,nzty l':a: strengths and
weaknesses..Some are readily apparent, some are not so noticeable, ar,~ so,',:':. ~.t'c only of interest
to particular companies, because businesses look at a community through ,i'~eir o,,vr., perspective.
Thc Naples area has a number of positive economic strengths beyond its b~e econotny of affluent
residents. Thc county's st~perior quality of life is an immense adva,.:~.~,.."., e. gcci-,~.iy since high
technology' bt,';inesses, that are opportunity driven and high value 0tl,~:c~! ~:~ ,':'~, a'ole to locate
their compar~ies in almost any location within the U.S. The county ha;: ,.,gl-..c.,-v,.,:'ate employee
transfer acceptance level, a strong hospital network, excellent local ..::h:.~c'.s ~,d public services.
and a Iow ,.'rime rate. All of these make the county an extremely attractive location for companies
that want to attract high caliber employees.
A member of the Council of Economic Advisors conducted detailed individual interviews with 50
of the county's CEOs. The respondents felt that the county's quality of life was the single most
important reason why a company would desire to locate here.
Collier County is a small sized metropolitan market (under a million l:eople) and ix also relatively
remote from a transportation point of view. While this remoteness ha:, :~etr)ed protect the county's
high quality of life, it effectively prevents the county from attracting any large businesses.
The lack of a trained work:force was cited by the county's CEOs as the single greatest problem for
local businesses. With few available buildings and sites, the county'.: ~ai estate community also
has difficulty meeting thc needs of many businesses, because the vast .,'najo~ity of companies
looking at an area want to move into an existing location.
Companies are also concerned about the existing business mix of an area. increasingly, companies
are beginning to actively seek to cluster together within regions or s~ecifi¢ :ocations. These
companies have discovered the advantages of the synergy that can bo develop'gal by clustering,
which includes sharing ideas, drawing from a talented employee base, joint v-.ntis, res, and research
and development. Collier County presently has no identified industry clust:x',: to build upon.
For some companies the 'cost of doing business' is their primary concern. These companies are
affected by the collective cost of payroll, rents, taxes, utilities and shipping costs. These companies
can find any number of more attractive locations within Florida, including neighboring Lee
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3
Program Development
County. The county also suffers from a perception that it has a poor business climate. As the
county's CEOs also noted, the county is not the location for all businesses.
This assessment allows us to develop a profile of the type of companies that have a good fit with
the county. Essentially, the kinds of companies that will be attracted to the county will be small,
progressive, high technology oriented, non-polluting, value-added businesses that are primarily
concerned with providing a high quality environment as an inducement to attract and retain a high
quality work.force.
Program Development
The development of a diversification program first requires that some overall goals be established
to guide the program.
To be successful, these goals must support the community's 'vision' of itself and reflect on the
kind of community that its residents wish to leave for their grandchildren.
The residents of Collier County generally share the same vision:
To maintain and enhance the Naples' world-class quality of life.
To achieve this vision of the future suggests a number of goals for the economic diversification
program:
(1) Enhance Property Values
through a value added public investment program.
(2) Develop a World Class Medical Center
that attracts both practitioners and cueffng edge medical technology.
(3) Create Economic Opportunities for County Residents
through small business assistance and customized job training.
(4) Diversity the Local Economy
to enable residents to establish/expand their businesses in the county.
4
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Program Development
Enhance the Tourism Program
by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off-season.
While these may at fa-st glance appear to be disparate goals, they are all critically interrelated within
the context of the Naples' economy.
(I) Enhancing Property Values
Maintaining property values is one of the primary purposes of local government and is certainly a
legitimate governmental concern. The long-term strength of the county's basic industry - the
overlapping combination of affluent retirees, seasonal residents, and tourism - is directly dependent
on maintaining a high quality of life environment.
In the long run, preserving the county's quality of lit'e is the single most important thing that the
county can do for the local economy.
Enhancing property values requires that the county adopt a value added, investment oriented
growth management program. This strategy includes acquiring and preserving the county's
extensive natural resources, adopting high quality urban design and landscaping standards, fully
funding road and storm drainage programs, providing high quality public service levels and having
top flight schools. In conjunction with this effort the county should adopt a strategy to shift its
general business and manufacturing facilities east of the interstate.
(2) Develop a World Class Medical Center
With the large concentration of senior citizens within the region and the high quality of life within
the community, the superior locally based medical industry of Collier County has the potential to
attract top flight medical practitioners and medically-related high technology and research facilities.
The medical technologies sector is one of the most rapidly growing sectors of the world economy.
Expanding this sector would increase the level of medical services available to the county's
residents, as well as diversify and strengthen the local economy. The medical sector offers the
greatest potential within tl'e county to grow into an industry cluster.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5
Program Development
Action Plan
While the county is new to economic diversification, it can draw on the lessons le2med from
successful economic diversification programs across Florida and the nation to develop a custom-
tailored, cost effective program to achieve the county's diversification goals.
The recommended Action Plan has five interrelated components:
(1) Auopt a Sound Growth Management Program.
The county government will need to take a strong role in adopting and ~'unding a value-added
capital improvements program, especially for roads, drainage and natural resource preservation;
maintaining high public service levels and strong design standards, and working with the education
community to ensure that the county's schools are the best in' Florida.
(2) Form a Strong Public/Private Partnership.
The county will need to join with the local business community to create a single organizational
structure to support the overall diversification efforts. The exisnng EDC can form the basis for this
partnership, but it will need to be augmented to handle the additional duties it will be undertaking.
This combined organization should enter into the ongoing re~onal and statewide economic
diversification efforts, and will need to be supported through county funding, as it is in all other
Florida communities.
(3) Improve the Business Climate.
There are a number of actions that the county can take to improve the business climate. These
include: forming a CEO roundtable to provide a forum for the county to hear local business
concerns; publishing a 'Guide to Local Permitting' handbook to assist local businesses with
regulations; streamlining the development review process (currently the number two business
incentive in the country); forming an economic diversification rapid response technical assistance
team; and providing and maintaining a detailed socioeconomic information database on the county.
'" Collier County Economic Diversity Program 7
Implementation
Part Four: Implementation
Introduction
Once a community decides that it will enter into the economic development business, it will quickly
discover that there are many other communities also doing the same thing, both across the country
and throughout Florida. The county can thus take advantage of the successful lessons learned by
these communities in thc development of its own program.
Businesses always seek locations which have stable government, socioeconomic, and business
climates. Success in expanding existing business and employment opportunities is very dependent
upon local economic diversification related organizations presenting a unified front. A community
that cooperates to the point of having an effective network of agencies, working in concert and
demonstrating preparedness will be successful. It is the intent of this plan to identify a structure for
successful organizational networking and cooperative effort for Collier County.
Wh/le the Economic Development Council of Collier County Inc. (EDC), through its initiatives,
competes tbr the attention of a number of external industry and trade groups, the Council
understands that its chief responsibility as a member of a public/private partnership with the county
and the education community is to assist in the "orderly, progressive creation of buslne~
expansion and employment opportunities for the residents of Collier County."
Successful organizations are those that focus on their primary organizational goals. The following
program and organizational structure has been developed to allow the county to achieve its shared
diversification goals.
Opportunity
The county is facing a new, and rapidly changing business environment, one that will challenge
traditional methods for expanding economic opportunity. Not only is the field of economic
diversification becoming more competitive among communities (there are 2,600 economic
diversification agencies in the U.S.); but other factors outside the county's control, such as those
brought on by rapid technological change, are poised to impact the community in the future. It is
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 1
Irrtvlementation
within, and because of this new atmosphere of rapid cultural change, economic uncertainty, and
increased competition for businesses, that opportunities exist.
Despite the competition, there is also increased cooperation among economic diversification
agencies within Florida, starting at the State level. Enterprise Florida ~s the new state level public/
private economic development organization that has just replaced the Depa~'tment of Commerce.
Through its regional offices, it will now serve as both a central cleating house for businesses
looking at the state; and it will also help raise venture capital fm Ioc,] et, trepreneurs. Regional
cooperation among counties has also become the norm across the state, as local county
organizatio.s pool scarce resources to achieve more efficient results.
The state's universities and community colleges are also expanding their business and technical
training opportunities, as is the local school system through its vo-tech programs. The passage of
the .rob Training Partnership Act, which merged a number of federal employment programs into a
single block grant, now gives local job training agencies mueb rr~ore flexibility in designing
successful local programs. This means that the education industry will be much better organized to
meet the county's needs for well trained employees.
The opportunities can be used to good advantage if the county and its various partners unite to
achieve their common aims.
ACTION PLAN
Step One . Create a strong public/private organizational structure.
Recommendations:
A. Strengthen the existing organizational structure through a strong Public/Private Partnership.
It is commonplace to f'md local economic development, or related organizations, enga~ng in 'tuff
protection,' to the detriment of the greater good of the community. For economic diversification
goaJs and objecrlves to be realized, a high degree of coordination and a breakdown of tuff
protection must occur. This is the critical ingredient in successfi.fl economic diversification
programs.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2
Implementation
Collier County and its municipalities have a number of agencies and organizations involved in
overlapping areas of economic diversification. A mechanism should be developed to ensure a
greater degree of coordination, so that all agencies are pulling in the same direction ar the same
time. Individual organizations need not lose their identity or purpose to become part of an
economic development team, however, teamwork requires organization, coordination, and
cooperation.
Success in the field of business expansion and diversification is also often dependent upon the
local economic development organizations relations with their local governments. In order to create
an environment which fosters cooperation and a preparedness to assist local businesses, the EDC
and the Board of County Commissioners must develop a committed partnership in coordination
with their education institutions, with defined roles for each parmer.
This will require the merging of the county's Council of Economic Advisors with the EDC into a
single uml:weL!a organizational structure. The staff of the EDC and the county's internal planning
and economic diversification staff will also need to work closely together through a joint yearly
work program.
The Cha/.rman of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners or his or her designee
from the Commission should serve on the Board of the Economic Development Council of Collier
County, Inc. (EDC). The City of Naples, the university, the community college, the school district
and the county's major chambers and tourism boards should also be represented on the board.
Th. rough this expanded board, the EDC would become the single point of contact and focus for the
county's collective economic diversification efforts. The increased communication and
coordination that this type of framework will provide will enable the county to focus and streamline
its collective efforts.
B. Designate both EDC and county stair to form lhe Collier County RapEd Response Team.
The Ford Test Track expansion project displayed the need for the county to have in place an
organizational mechanism whereby the pannership can quickly come together and organize local
resource, r co address or resolve large scale, important economic diversification issues. The
members of the team, depending on the type of project or issue should include: the county manager
(for selected projects) and the director(s) of: utilities, transportation, permitting, planning, fin:
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3
Implementation
marshals office; representatives from the water management district (for new building), HR$ -
health depmunent (septic tank), DEP (when local and project specific, i.e. air or water quality),
Department of Transportation (if on a state road), the president of the EDC (for selected projects)
and vice president for business retention and expansion (relocation).
The Rapid Response Team must be able to meet on short notice with clients requiring technical
assistance. The EDC would be responsible for determining the need to assemble the team.
C. Create a Business and Education Roundtable.
The most difficult aspect of maintaining a viable economic development effort is keeping all thc
parties interested, involved, and in partnership with the overall effort. Communications flow must
be maintained. Frequent, if not regular meetings of professional staff of area economic
diversification or related organizations are necessar7. It is envisioned that anendees of the
roundtable will use this opportunity, to coordinate, exchange data and collaborate on projects and
programs supportive of creating econom/c opportunities in Collier County.
It is recommended that the roundtable establish a regular bimonthly meeting at which topics of
mutual interest are discussed. These meetings are an excellent forum for bringing in experts, from
the llst of technical assistance organizations, or outside agencies, to educate and stimulate
members.
The Chairman of the EDC will appoint a board member as Vice Chair for the EDC's Roundtable. A
representative of each educational institutional and a representative of each industry, sector (SIC
code and the state's targeted industry list) fi.om ~,ong the business community should be
appointed to the Roundtable. The purpose of this group will be to develop effective training
programs which meet business and industry needs, and to raise issues of concerns to local
business people.
D. Improve the Business Climate.
The issue that a county or city is not 'business friendly' is more often than not a perception
problem. However, a county should always be concerned when its local business community
ra/ses these issues. All too often small businesses, especially, run into trouble while trying to
negotiate their way through complex governmental regulatory processes.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4
Implementation
Communities that have addressed this le~timate business concern have found that the preparation
of an understandable 'guide to the local permitting process' that educates local businesses on the
bow's and why's of the local permit process in order to alert local business people to what permits
are required and how to quickly and easily obtain any necessary permits, is a solid start to
improving the perception that a community is business friendly.
Along with the preparation of the 'guide,' the county should also conduct an internal audit and
focus group discussions with its customers to ensure that the regulatory and development approval
process is '~s streamlined as possible. The old adage that 'time is money' is still relevant in the
regulatory field. Communities have always found that it is not the regulations themselves that
concern businesses, but the time involved in getting the pen'nit.
While f'mancial assistance tops the list of most often asked for business incentives, fast-tracked
permitting assistance is now the number two most asked for business 'incentive' in the country.
Yet a streamlined permitting system is a management improvement that does not cost the county
any money to implement.
To oversee the county's internal economic diversification support efforts, the county should
designate an employee of the Community Development Services Division as a local 'ombudsman.'
This staff 1,:vel person would serve as a direct link to the business community and coordinate staff
efforts with the EDC. The individual should be thoroughly familiar with local development
regulations, review procedures, permitting licensing, etc. This position would also provide a
needed linkage with individual existing businesses to help determine business/government related
problems and serve as a conduit to district commissioners on problems that may need to be handled
by the elected officials or county agencies.
This function should also provide a critical link to local chambers of commerce and other business
organizations. Collectively, this effort will ensure that le~fimate business concerns are assessed
and addressed by the county.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Program Development
(3) Create Economic Opportunities for Local Residents
The current economy will continue to create a number of Iow paying, Iow benefit, cyclical and
seasonal (busy during the season, laid off during the off season) jobs in the retail trade and
services industry. Thc lack of business and employment opportunities in other sectors uld. mately
hurts the local business community's ability to attract the quality labor force that is necessary
provide the high business service levels that are the Naples' trademark.
To achieve d'fis goal will require the county to emulate its neighbors and implement comprehensive
small business assistance and customized job training programs in partnership with the local
business and education communities. These programs are designed to help local residents prosper
as well as ensure that the county can maintain a high quality work. force.
(4) Diversify the Local Economy
Diversification can help to both recession-proof the local economy and shift the tax base away from
residential to non-residential uses, which typically pay far more in local property taxes then they
requ~ ia public services. ColLier County should not expect to be home to any major industries,
nor should it seek to attract them, but it is an ideal location for those residents that wish to locate
their high value added small business near their homes. The Im. mokalee area, with its upgraded
a2q:~rt and business park, offers a high quality location for locating new businesses to the area.
The 1-75 interchanges also offer excellent locations for new corporate office park development.
Implementing th. is program will require a public/private partnership with the local business and real
estate community to ensure that there are available sites and buildings for new companies.
(5) Enhance the Tourism Program
The county's highly successful tourism program focuses on the county's world class resort
facilities located west of US 41. Unfortunately, the seasonal nature of this program leaves these
facilities and their employees underutilized during the summer. The fastest growing sector of the
international tourism market is in ecotourism, of which the county, with the Everglades National
Park and its other large nature preserves is ideally suited to serve. 'Because this market is not
seasonally driven azd often occurs in the summer, when families and Europeans travel, it is a
natural complement to the county's existing tourism development program.
6
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Implementation
Step Two - Help the county's small businesses expand.
Recommendations:
A. Create a business retention and expansion office within the EDC.
Because the vast majority of the county's businesses are small, the major focus of the county's
cLiver~Lfica:ion program should be on small business assistance. This assistance would include:
Developing a financial assistance and incentive packaging pro.eram which can be made available to
existing and new business proje:ts. To be competitive, the fo!lov,'ing should be included: SBA 504
and 7a loans, conventional bank financing, taxable bonds, venture capir, al opportunities.
~ransporta~ion trust fund, tec,hnoto_~'y transfer program, and qualified target indus~-y tax refund
program.
Developing a labor training package for existing business expansions and new businesses that
includes: quick response training, workforce development funds, vocational education business
and indus:E,.' training, and other federal and state funds available for training.
B. Develop a Small Business Development Center
The cei~ter would be developed both to provide technical assistance and an incubator for small and
minority owned businesses. A combination of partnerships should be developed for this initiative.
Partners should include: the Economic Development Council, Collier County Florida Gulf Coast
University University, Edison Community College, Worlcforce Development Board, Small
Business Administration, and Enterprise Florida.
Services to be provided would include: a library and computer center for the use by small
businesses in the development of business plans, marketing plans, financial and accounting, etc.
Space would be made available to small and disadvantaged businesses for a limit~ tL,'ne and a
nominal cost which would include the sharing of common business applications such as
accounting, secretarial and receptionist services. Identification of local products which could be
matched to local buyers in CoLlier County and within the region would be made. Ongoing seminars
for small businesses would also be conducted.
.... Collier' County Economic Diversity Program 6
Implementation
Step Three. Work to create a world class medical center.
Recommendations:
Develop a research driven targeted recruitment program.
Working with the area's healthcare providers, develop a business recruitment program targeted
toward medically and medically related industries, including medium to high technology related
companies. Prepare industry specific data packages to support this effort.
B. Persuade companies from specifically targeted medically related industries to locate their
business facilities in Collier County.
Conduct three recrui~ent initiatives per year to targeted markets. These marketing missions will
target specific companies that have been found to be compatible with Collier County's available
land and building product as well as business climate. Whenever possible, the targeted industry
should match with Enterprise Florida's targeted industries. Participate with the International Trade
and Economic Development Partnership of Enterprise Florida in two trade shows per year.
Individual calls should be established around the trade show. Conduct one to two Reverse
Investment Missions per year. These missions should be in conjunction with Enterprise Florida
Trade Shows with one on one calls developed around the show.
C. Expand employment opportunities for local residents.
Working v.'ith the county's educational institutions, inc!:ding ',.he new university, develop both
degree and customized job training programs specifically targeted to the needs of medically related
industries. Whenever practicable, the county should also focus the small business start-up and
business incubator programs on this specific market.
Step Four . Help residents locate their businesses within the county.
One of the dramatic ch~ges occurring with the shift in the world economy to knowledge.based
industries is that many of these companies are now 'foot-loose,' meaning they can locate based on
quality of Life. Thus it is not surprising that many of the county's residents whose businesses are
located elsewhere have expressed an interest in locating in Collier County.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program
Implementation
Recommendations:
A. Develop a targeted business recruitment program.
Conduct an annual fam~arization tour of Collier County to showcase the county. Familiarization
tours should be conducted for:. local business owners and CEOs, whose businesses ar~ located
elsewhere, representatives of Enterprise Florida, and representatives of national site facilitators.
IdentLfy former representatives of corporations/businesses that have retired to ColLier County, and
enlist their assistance in iden6fying companies to target for recruitment. Identify owners or CEOs
of corporations which currently have second homes in Naples and develop a marketing program
designed to create expansions or relocations from this initiative.
Step Five . Implement the program.
R ecomrnendation~ :
A. Provide the additional staffand resources necessary to support the effort.
Create a professional organization through the development of internal procedures for management
and delivery of services, and professional staff development. Develop a computerized land and
building inventory. Conduct workshops with Realtors and developers to enlarge the land and
building data base. Develop a computerized project management system. This system will detail the
process utilized by the Council's staff in prospect response and diversification pre)jeer
management. Require all professional staff of both the public and private partnership involved in
the parmer~hip to at'tend the Basic Economic Development Course, and where appropriate the
Economic Development Institute. At'tend and participate in Florida Economic Development Council
meetings and workshops. Participate in the Industrial Development Research Council. Maintain
working relationships with Enterprise Florida and its various parmerships. Develop a computerized
tracking system to be used in preparation of a monthly report of activities and results achieved, as
measured against annual goals developed for each activity identified in the annual action plan. The
monthly reporting should be designed to create cumulative monthly totals resulting in the Council's
annual report. This report should be used as an accountability tool for the Parmership.
Promote Collier Counry through the development of collateral informational material, including: an
appropriate demo~aphic atlas, which can be easily updated on a bi-yearly basis; a cus:omize, d
promotional packages for prospects that call and request information on Collier Count.,.'. A
Collier County E~:0nomic Diversity Program ...... 8
Implementation
Business Ombudsman
This position can only be successfully performed by a staff position within the county. This
individual would be tasked with preparing the business guide as well as spearheading a county-
wide regulatory streamlining self-evaluation. This individual would also serve as the county's
contact man with local businesses and provide staff support to the county's technical assistance
rapid response team.
Business Incubator
County's have traditionally been the driving force behind business incubators, dJrect/y seeking
private sector professionals, to operate the incubator, while funding the program through the
Community Development Block Grant Program (C"DBG). The county will become eligible to
receive these federal CDBG funds in approximately tl'u'ee years: and at that time can decide whether
to directly operate this program or contract it to the EDC.
Small Business Assistance
The private sector is better suited to handle this assignment. This task has three major components:
business retention, assisting'local businesses that are being forced to relocate or hav~g ~ouble;
business expansion, helping the local business community expand and diversify; and assisting
county residents start-up successful business endeavors. The completion of this task requires the
assistance of the local education and financial communities, and the EDC is best equipped to
undertake this task. This task will require two additional professional level employees.
Assisting Local Residents Relocate Their Businesses to the County
The EDC is the organization that is better suited to handle this assignment. This task includes
assisting local residents, whose high value added businesses have a good fit with the county, or
will help revitalize the Immokalee area, find suitable locations and an adequate labor supply within
the county. This task will also include worldng directly with the area's public and private education
and tra/ning providers to develop customized job training programs for the county's residents, who
are seeking to improve their situations. This task will require an additional professional level
employee.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program 10
Implementation
The World Class Medical Initiative
Th. is highly important task will require a highly focused, cooperative effort between the county's
mexlical community, the county, the education community and the EDC. This will involve
developing a list of practitioners and medically related companies that can strengthen the local
economy and improve local rmdical care. Then the initiative will need to actively recruit these
companies both dimcdy and through corporate site facilitators. Freed from other dudes through
county staffs assumption of technical support tasks, the existing EDC staff can focus on this highly
important endeavor.
Maintaining the Naples Class Standard Quality of Lire
The county, because it represents both residents and businesses, is the only entity that can carry
out this highly critical assignment. Maintaining the county's quality of life under the pressure of
100,000 new year-round residen:s and 30,000 additional seasonal will place a tremendous burden
on the county and its municipalities. The county should conduct a thorough, internal self
examination of its growth management, natural resources, design standards and capital
improvement programs. The purpose of this self review is to develop a value added invesn'nent
program for the county that will support and enhance the Naples world class standard quality of
life. The whole Naples economy is based on its quality of life.
Budgeting
The county and the EDC v,,Lll need to develop specific funding requirements, although the county
can project matching the public sectors contribution to the EDC, in addition to its own expand
internal. The county will also need additional staff for this effort. The county should fund this
additional effort out of general revenues, until the county becomes a participant in the federally
funded CDBG program, at which time this prolvam can be utilized to support a significant portion
of this effort. Because the state requires a local match for a number of its business assistance
program the county should also support this effort directly during the interim until the CDBG
program comes on line.
Collier County Economic Diversity Program I 1
5.SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Table of Contents
Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Personal Income by Major Source and Earnings by Industry
Regional Economic Profile
Full and Part Time Employees by Major Industry
Transfer Payments
Farm Income and Expenses
1992 Ctnsus of Business
1992 Economic Census Profile
Geographic Area Series
Comparison of Data Tables
1993 County Business Patterns
· ColLier County Report
1996 Claritas Household Information
1990 Household by Age/Income Report
1996 Household by Age/Income Report
200I (projected) Household by Age/Income Report
1996 Household Wealth Estimates
Comparison of Data Tables
Employment
Deta~ed Employment by Year 1991-I994
Employment by Year 1991-1995
Comparison of Data Tables
1990 Census
Community Profile Series
Collier County
4
n\
Collier County Economic Development
Priyate Earnings By Industry (000's)
1970 1980 1990
By Industry:
Agncu1~.'re/Forest;,y/Fi~ling $ 4,253 $ 15,940 $ 66,554
Mining $ 1,220 $ 14,997 $ 4,716
Coercion $ 24,490 $ 89,488 $ 259,912
Manufacturing $ 2,688 $ 17,414 $ 66,961
Trar~port./CommunicJ13ublic U31;'0e$ $ 5,036 $ 23,014 $ 59,267
Wholesale Trade $ 5,709 $ 25,691 $ 61,658
Re~ilTrade $ 20,719 $ 89,298 $ 271,796
Finance/ir~anceJReal Estate $ 23,779 $ 48,078 $ 182,249
Sauces S 24,752 $142,582 S 620,661
Government $ 10,573 $ 52,529 $ 185~810
To~a;: $ 123,21g $ 519,031 $ 1,779,584
Source: Regional Eco~ormc Info-nation System, Bureau of EconomJc Analysis. 199~
Comparision
1994 US Florida
96,703
5,421
270,263
82.642
69,727
81,390
361,542
225,002
885,594
239,390
$ 2,317,$74
Private Earnings By IndUstry as a Percentage of Ali Earnings
1970 1980 1990 1994
By Industry:
Agnct~r e/F or asia/Fishing 3.5% 3.1% 3.7% 4.2%
Mining 1.0% 2.9% 0.3% 0,2%
C o ns~.'ucl:lon 19.9% 17.2% 14.6% 11.7%
Manufacl;unng 2.2% 3.4% 3.8% 3,6%
TransportJComrnuc~c./Pub/~c U~e$ 4.1% 4.4% 3.3% 3,0%
Wholesale Trade 4.6% 4.9% 3.5% 3.5%
Reta,J Trade 16.8% 17.2% 15.3% 15.6%
~nanceAnsurance/Real Estate 19.3% 9.3% 10.2% 9,7%
Sauces 20.1% 27.5% 34.9% 38.2%
Government 8.6% 10.1% 10.4% 10.3%
Total: 100.0% 100,0% 100.0%
$curce Regional Econcm~c Infocrnancn System. Bureau ~f Econo~n~c AnalysJ$.
26804000 2068437
36349000 296900
2.18E+08 10756365
7.47E*08 17475332
2.73E+08 12170366
2.55E-08 11814645
392E+08 22166731
3.03E+08 14763571
1.13E+09 61239463
6.55E+08 30038555
4.03E+09 1.83E*08
CompaHsion. 1994
U.S. Florida
0.7% 1.1%
0.9% 0.2%
5.4% 5.9%
18.5% 9.6%
6.8% 6.7%
6.3% 6 5%
9.7% 12.1%
7.5% 8.1%
27.9% 33.5%
16.2% 16.4%
100.0% 100 0% 100 0%
Pa~e I
1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service
Collier County, FL
Table
i - General Statistics by Sector
Number Sales or Annual
of Receipts Payroll
Sector Year Estabs ($millton) ($mlllion)
Number
of
Employees
Collier County, FL
Retail Trade 1992 1,529 1,783
1987 1,236 1,133
1982 892 663
Wholesale £rade 1992 296 545
1987 214 346
1982 125 179
Service Industries ** 1992 1,785 972
1987 1,261 522
1982 843 215
.0 225.1 17,610
.1 139.3 13,328
.1 79.0 9,078
8 47.2 2,192
6 25.3 1,378
0 12.6 1,163
9 353.2 18,639
4 189.2 12,608
6 81.5 6,500
FLORIDA
Retail Trade 1992 87,653 118,741.8
1987 83,808 87,925.6
1982 66,892 54,539.7
Wholesale Trade 1992 30,137 132,562.2
1987 25,636 97,360.0
1982 19,537 65,614.6
Service Industries ** 1992 119,962 74,34~.2
1987 98,713 45,530.9
1982 68,723 21,542.0
13,276.0
10,297.0
6,398.2
7,485.1
5,554.7
3,562.0
27,658.2
16,909.6
8,082.0
1,102,279
1,022,862
754,014
280,916
261,765
211,639
1,273,956
974,746
600,749
Table 2 - Selected Ratios by Sector
Year Population
1992 164,729
1987 127,921
1982 99,902
-Retail Wholesale ........ Services
Sales Payroll Sales Payroll Recelp=s
per per per per per
Capita Employee Capita Employee Capita
($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
Collier County, FL
10,824.1 12,784.8 3,313.6 21,542.9 5,906.2
8,857.6 10,451.5 2,709.3 18,364.3 4,083.5
6,637.9 8,704.0 1,791.3 10,846.1 2,157.7
Payroll
per
Employee
($)
18,948.1
15,006.8
12,536.2
FLORIDA
1992 13,482,716 8,807.0 12,044.1 9,832.0 26,645.3 5,514.3
1987 11,997,282 7,328.8 10,066.9 8,115.2 21,220.0 3,795.1
1982 10,471,405 5,208.4 8,485.6 6,266.1 16,830.6 2,057.2
[See explanatory notes at end of Table 6B]
[For Transportation, Communications, Utilities, Financial,
and Real Estate Industries, See Tables 7 and 8.]
Source: 1992 Economic Census
21,710.5
17,347.7
13,453.1
Insurance,
1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service
Collier County, FL
~_ Table 3 - Top Places in Collier County, FL
in terms of 1992 population
--- Retail Wholesale Services--
Popu- Number Number Number
lation of Sales of Sales of Rcpts
Geo Area Name (1992) Estabs ($mil) Estabs ($mil) Es:abs ($mil)
Naples 20,431 747* 761 95 104 856* 48
Balance of county 144,298 782* 1,022 201, 442 929* 48
* The reports and databases include more Kind-of-Business detail for this area
Table 4 - Percent Change in Employment and Sales from Prior Census
Years
1987 - 1992
1982 - 1987
Retail .......... Wholesale ....
Number of' ' Number of
Sales Employees Sales Employees
Collier Count~, FL
57.36 32.13 57.50 59.07
70.87 46.82 93.67 18.49
.... Service** ....
Number of
Receipts Employees
86.25 47.83
142.33 93.97
1987 - 1992
1982 - 1987
FLORIDA
35'.05 7.76 36.16 7.32
61.21 35.66 48.38 23.68
63.29 30.70
111.36 62.26
1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service
Collier County, FL
Table SA- Sales by Kind of Business - 1992:
Collier County, FL
l---Top Place--: : ....... County ....... ~ :-State:
Naples Collier County FL
~ of Sales # of
> Kind of Business < Estab ($mil) Estab
Retail Trade 747 761.0 1,529
Bldg Materials & Etc 19 20.5 67
Gen Mdse S~ores 9 (D) 17
Food Stores 67 133.4 152
Auto Dealers 25 76.8 82
Gas Stations 28 47.4 59
Apparel & Accessories 136 95.6 223
Furniture &Misc 92 88.3 193
Eating & Drinking 155 92.9 371
Drug Stores 21 36.6 37
Misc Retail 195 (D) 328
Wholesale Trade 95 104.0 296
Merchant Wholesalers 87 75.7 267
Other Whclesa!ers 8 28.3 29
!
Count
Sales KB Sls Sale
by KB pot of Sales % o
($mll) sctr(1) (Sm!l) Stat
1,783.0 100.0 118,741.8 1.
114.3 6.4 5,524.0 2.
193.7 10.9 14,096.7 1.
354.8 19.9 21,195.2 1.
307.3 17.2 30,029.4 1.
97.1 5.4 7,463.1 1.
140.2 7.9 6,506.1 2.
174.3 9.8 6,148.4 2.
194.7 10.9 12,110.6 1.
77.6 4.4 5,057.2 1.
129.1 7.2 10,611.2 1..
545.8 100.0 132,562.2 0..
479.7 87.9 81,848.2 0.~
66.2 12.1 50,714.0 0.[
Table 5B- Sales by Kind of Business - 1992:
, Collier County, FL
.---Top Place--: : ....... County ....... : :-State:
Naples Collier County FL
# of Sales # of
> Kind of Business < Estab ($mil) Estab
Service Indust. ** 856 487.4 1,785
Hotels, Motels, Etc. 23 (D) 53
Personal Services 88 15.3 189
Business Services 148 94.9 342
Auto Repair & Garages 26 8.2 121
Misc Repair Services 28 4.7 96
Amusements 48 40.1 119
Health Services ** 240 158.7 380
Legal Services 89 41.3 147
Social Services 15 6.5 50
Professional Services' 139 47.8 260
[See explanatory notes at end of Table 6BI
Source: 1992 Economic Census.
Sales KB
by KB pot of Sales
($mil) sc~r(1) ($mll)
972.9 100.0 74,347.2
213.7 22.0 6,244.9
30.4 3.1 2,339.7
172.4 17.7 13,765.2
33.5 3.4 4,473.5
16.4 1.7 1,944.7
78.4 8.1 6,185.3
239.6 24.6 23,306.6
69.7 7.2 5,394.0
14.3 1.5 824.7
99.9 10.3 9,074.8
County
Sales
% of
State
1.3
3 4
i 3
I 3
0 7
0 8
I 3
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.1
1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service
Collier County, FL
Table 6A- Sales by Kind of Business - 1987: Collier County, FL
~---Top Place--~ ~ County .....
> Kind of Business
Naples Collier County
Sales KB Sls % Chg
# of Sales # of by F~B pct of in Sls
Estab ($mtl) Estab ($mll) sctr{1) 92/87
Retail Trade 653 589.8 1,236 1,133.1
Bldg Materials & Etc 20 16.1 58 64.9
Gen Mdse Stores 10 86.0 19 109.5
Food Stores 73 120.8 153 248.5
Auto Dealers 36 93.6 88 231.0
Gas S~atio~.s 33 33.1 60 56.7
Apparel & Accessories 132 57.1 177 73.6
Furniture &Misc 76 47.5 160 107.8
Eating & Drinking 113 58.8 253 116.2
Drug Stores 18 25.7 33 45.8
Mlsc Retail 142 51.2 235 79.2
Wholesale Trade 79 71.7 214 346.6
Merchant Wholesalers 68 54.1 189 231.1
Other Wholesalers 11 17.7 25 115.4
Sales
(Sm!l)
100.0 57.4 $7,925.{
5.7 76.2 4,699.2
9.7 76.9 9,911.!
21.9 42.8 17,001.7
20.4 33.0 22,447.7
5.0 71.1 5,528.6
6.5 90.6 4,002.6
9.5 6!.7 4,676.5
10.3 67.5 9,087.9
4.0 69.6 3,323.8
7.0 63.0 7,246.6
100.0 57.5 97,360.0
66.7 107.5 59,629.3
33.3 -42.7 37,730.7
Table 6B- Sales by Kind of Business - 1987:
Collier County, FL
:---Top Place--: ' County ......
Naples
# of
Kind of Business < Estab
' ' Collier County
Sales
($mil)
# of
Estab
Sales KB $1s % Chg
by KB pct of in Sls
($mil) sctr(1) 92/87
Service Indust. ** 699 283.1 1,261 522.4
Hotels, Motels, Etc. 29 90.5 57 164.4
Auto Repair & Garages 25 7.2 87 24.7
Amusements 39 17.1 98 41.8
Health Services ** 183 75.6 246 102.4
Legal Services 76 21.0 122 37.2
, .-State
FL
Sales
($mil)
100.0 86.3 45,530.9
31.5 30.0 4,474.6
4.7 35.3 3,230.5
8.0 87.5 3,757.6
19.6 134.0 12,901.0
7.1 87.3 3,697.5
(D) - Withheld to avoid disclosing operations of individual companies.
ESTABS - Establishments. SALES - value of sales (retail/wholesale), or service
for establs with paid employees. See the reports for other definitions.
1/ The PERCENT of SALES (RECEIPTS) for the SECTOR by the KIND OF BUSINESS
** Services includes only taxable estab$. Census-to-census comparisons are
affected by coverage of hospitals, scme cther services. Private hospitals are
included in 1987, excluded in 1982. ~
1992 Economic Census Profile:
Collier County, FL
Ail Manufacturing
20 Food & Kindred
21 Tobacco
22 Textiles
23 Apparel
24 Lumber/Wood Prods
25 Furniture
26 Paper & Board
27 Print/Publish
28 Chemicals
29 Petroleum
30 Rubber/Plastics
31 Lea=her
32 Clay/Glass/Ceramic
33 Primary Metals
34 Fabricated Metals
35 Machines/Computer
36 Electro/Electronic
37 Transp Equipment
38 Instruments
39 Misc Manufactures
No of
Estabs
177
Manufactures
Estabs Employees Val Added Shipments
Emp>20 (000) ($mil) ($mil)
19 2.2 107.4 188.0
47 4 0.6 45.1 58.9
18 2 0.3 14.9 33.3
15 2 0.5 15.7 33.7
Empl as % of:
State US,by
Ail mfg SIC
100.0 0.5
27.3
13.6 1.]
22.7 1.~
FLORIDA
1992 Economic Census Profile: Manufactures
No of Estabs Employees Va1 Added Shipments
Estabs Emp>20 (000) ($mil) ($mil)
All Manufacturing 16382
20 Food & Kindred 703
21 Tobacco 20
22 Textiles 154
23 Apparel 1251
24 Lumber/Wood Prods 1265
25 Furniture 810
26 Paper & Board 183
27 Print/Publish 3415
28 Chemicals 498
29 Petroleum 53
30 Rubber/Plastics 634
31 Leather 64
32 Clay/Glass/Ceramic 957
33 Primary Metals 124
34 Fabricated Metals 1331
35 Machines/Computer 1553
36 Electro/Electronic 764
37 Transp Equipment 873
38 Instruments 534
39 Misc Manufactures 905
3758 472.4 32,634.4 64,274.7
260 41.5 4,423.4 11,716.5
7 0.9 44.7 93.6
43 ' ' 4.3 161.3 321.0
354 33.6 1,003.3 1,936.2
229 19.0 861.8 2,102.7
155 13.1 537.9 1,028.3
97 14.2 1,299.8 3,339.7
426 56.0 3,573.2 5,136.1
149 20.2 2,768.7 6,667.6
13 1.1 132.5 310.0
207 19.0 962.9 1,954.2
17 2.1 101.8 175.3
238 17.7 1,074.7 2,284.5
41 4.6 250.1 740.3
349 30.4 1,527.7 3,417.2
316 29.0 1,726.6 3,170.3
291 57.9 4,968.3 7,595.5
199 36.4 3,186.2 6,099.9
155 43.0 3,586.9 5,363.9
105 9.4 442.6 821.8
Empl as % of:
US
Ail mfg
100.0
8.8
0.2
0.9
7.1
4.0
2.8
3.0
11.9
4.3
0.2
4.0
0.4
3.7
1.0
6.4
6.1
12.3
7.7
9.1
2.0
1992 Economic Census Profile:
Collier County, FL
Table 9 - Firms and Receipts by Group
..... All Firms
Minority-Owned, Women-Owned Firms
Receipts
Group Number ($mil.)
Firms with Employees ---~
N~mbe:
Receipts of
Number ($mil.) Employee~
Ail firms
Black-Own,.d firms
18,748 2,900.0 3,715 2,359.0 24,72~
202 10.6 59 8.1 13:
Women-Owned firms
6,553 666.5 1,286 535.6 6,974
1~92 Economic Census Profile:
Table 10 - Comparison Ratios:
Group
All firms
Black-Ow-ned firms
Minority-Owned, Women-Owned Firms
Collier County, FL
Percent of County, Percent of Group in State
--- All Firms ........ Firms with Employees .....
Receipts )>>> <<< Receipts >>> <¢ Employees
Percent
of County
100.0
0.4
Pct of Pct of 'Pct of Payroll
Group in Percent Group in Group per
State of Cnty State in ST employee
1.7 100.0 1.6 1.6 17,190
0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 14,053
Women-Owned firms
23.0
1.7 22.7 1.6 1.6 14,030
1992 Economic Census--Retail Trade
Geographic Area Series
Geography: Collier County, FL
SiC and Descrlpticn
Number
of estab-
lishments
Sales
($1,000)
Number of
employees
52
521,3
525
526
527
53
531
531
533
539
54
541
542
546
543-5,9
55ex.554
551
552
553
555-7,9
554
56
561
562,3
562
563
565
566
564,9
57
5712
5713,4,9
572
573
58
5812
5812 pt.
5812 pt.
5812 pt.
58!2 pt.
5813
591
59ex.591
592
593
594
5941
5942
5944
5943,5-9
Re%ail Trade
Building ma=rl & garden supp.
Building materials and supp.
Hardware stores
Rtl nurser!es/lawn & garden
Mfg (mobile) home dealers
General merchandise stores
Dept store (incl leased dept)
Dept store (excl leased dept)
Variety stores
Misc. general merchandise
Food stores
Grocery stores
Meat and fish market
Retail bakeries
O~her fccd stores
Automotive dealers
New & used car dealers
Used car dealers
Auto and home supply stores
Misc automotive dealers
Gasoline service stations
Apparel and accessory stores
Men's & boy's clothing & acc.
Women's clothing/specialty
Women's clothing
Women's accessory & specialt
Family clothing stores . '
Shoe stores
Other apparel & accessory
Furniture and homefurnishings
Furniture stores
Hcmefurnishings stores
Household appliance stores
Radio/TV/computer/music store
Eating and drinking places
Eating places
Restaurants
Cafeterias
Refresb~ent places
Other eating places
Drinking places
Drug and proprietary stores
Miscellaneous retail stores
Liquor stores
Used merchandise stores
Misc shopping goods stores
Sporting goods & bike shops
Book stores
Jewelry stores
Other misc shopping goods
1,529
67
39
15
11
2
17
9
9
4
4
152
112
5
11
24
82
14
· 10
33
25
59
223
22
114
93
21
25
34
28
193
74
79
11
29
371
356
221
3
104
28
15
37
328
14
33
167
29
14
44
8O
1,783,047
114,307
88,260
15,940
(D)
(D)
193,660
143,374
139,089
3,987
50,584
354,849
342,449
1,533
1,723
9,144
307,324
255,007
7,313
17,599
27,405
97,059
140,193
10,234
60,026
5!,548
8,478
42,246
18,578
9,109
174,286
85,972
54,965
11,187
22,162
194,659
191,728
134,500
(D)
48,320
(D)
2,931
77,604
129,106
12,816
7,526
64,868
11,332
6,941
23,919
22,676
17,610
780
189
20-99
0-19
1,250
(NA)
1,130
42
78
3,428
3,242
11
53
122
876
529
41
157
149
442
1,548
120
768
654
114
330
192
138
1,196
569
417
59
151
6,245
6,173
4,209
20-99
1,719
100-249
72
454
1,391
78
108
656
9O
82
182
302
596
598
5992
5993
5994
5995
5999
Nonstore retailers
Fuel dealers
Florists
Tobacco stores and stands
News dealers & newsstands
Op%lcal goods stores
Misc retail stores, n.e.c.
],6
2
28
4
0
12
52
11,524
(D)
6,910
2,588
0
4,972
(D)
141
0-19
132
! 62
100-249
1992 Economic Census--Wholesale Trade
Geographic Area Series
Geography: Collier County, FL
SIC and Descrlp:icn
Number
of estab-
lishments
Sales
($1,000)
' N~mber of
' employees
Wholesale %fade, total
Merchan~ wholesalers
50 Durable goods
Merchan= wholesalers
501 Motor vehicles & parts & supplies
Merchant wholesalers
502 F~rniture and homefurnishings
Merchant wholesalers
503 Lumber&other construction materls
Merchant wholesalers
504 Professiona!&ccmmercia! equip&sup
Merchant wholesalers
505 Metals &minerals,except petroleum
Merchant wholesalers
506 E!ec~rlcai gccds
Merchant wholesalers
507 Hardwre,&plumbng&heatng eqp&splys
Merchant wholesalers
508 Machinery, equipment, & supplies
Merchant wholesalers
509 Miscellaneous durable goods
Merchant wholesalers
51 Nondurable gcods
Merchant wholesalers
511 Paper and paper products
Merchant wholesalers
512 Drugs,prprietries,&drugsts'sundrs
Merchant wholesalers .
513 Apparel, piece goods, and notions
Merchant wholesalers
514 Groceries and related products
Merchant wholesalers
515 Farm-product raw materials
Merchant wholesalers
516 Chemicals and allied products
Merchant wholesalers
517 Petrc!eum and petroleum products
Merchant wholesalers
518 Beer,wine,&dstilld alchlic bevrgs
Merchant wnolesa!ers
519 Misce!!anecus nondurable goods
Merchant wholesalers
296
267
173
158
29
28
22
19
17
16
24
23
5
4
12
12
22
20
· 27
25
15
11
123
109
7
7
4
4
10
9
47
40
0
0
9
9
15
15
1
1
3O
24
545,847
479,697
198,816
173,751
28,368
(D)
18,563
15,564
19,864
(D)
18,054
(D)
7,762
(D)
20,533
20,533
21,206
(D)
47,943
(D)
16,523
4,739
347,031
305,946
3,576
3,576
1,441
1,441
4,420
(D)
217,956
182,667
0
0
4,708
4,708
31,727
31,727
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
2,192
2,091
932
891
!43
100-249
129
124
73
20-99
142
100-249
33
20-99
64
64
85
20-99
214
100-249
49
27
1,260
1,200
34
34
11
11
19
0-19
950
912
0
0
20
20
55
55
20-99
20-99
100-249
100-249
1992 Economic Census--Service
Geographic Area Series
Geography: Collier County, FL
SiC
70 ex 704
7011
7011 pt.
7011 pt.
702,3
72
721
7211
7213
7215
7216
7217
7218
72i2,9
722
723,4
723
724
725
726
729
73
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
7371,2,3
7374,5,6
7377,8,9
738
75
751
752
753
7532
7538
7533,4,6,7,9
754
76
762
7622
7623,9
763
764
78,79,84
781,2
Industries:
and Descriptlcn
Total (taxable)
Hotels,houses,camps,otb
Hotels and motels
Hotels
Motel,motor hote!,cts
Other lodging places
Personal services
Laundry,cleanlng,garm
Power laund,fam/comm,
Linen supply*
Coin-oper laund/drycl
Dryclean plt,ex rug*
Carpet/upho!st clean
Industrial launderers
Otb laundry,clean,gar
Photo s~udios,por:rait
Beauty and barber shop
Beauty shops
Barber shops
Shoe repair shop,shine
Funeral serv/crema=ory
Misc personal services
Business services
Advertising
Adjust,collect,credit
Mail,coDy,photo,steno
Serv to dwellings,bldg
Misc equip rent/lease
Personnel supply serv
Comp prog,process,oth
Comp prcg,prepk soft~
Data processing serv
Comp rent/lease,maint
Misc business serv
Auto repair,serv,park
Auto rent/lease,w/o dr
Automobile parking
Automotive repair shop
Top,body,uphol,paint
Gert automotive repair
Otb automotive reDair
Auto serv, ex repair
e~a_. services
Electrical repair shop
Ra~io,TV repair shops
Other e!ec rep shops
Wa=ch,clock,Jewe!ry rp
Reuphcl/furniture rep
M!sc repair,tel serv
~musement/rec services
Mction picture service
Firms
Subject
to Federal Income Tax
Number
of estab-
lishments
Receipts
($1,000)
Number of
employees
1,785
53
44
26
18
9
189
54
0
1
17
15
15
1
5
2
110
110
0
2
3
18
342
15
6
34
80
30
29
24
16
3
5
124
121
8
0
83
20
45
18
30
96
24
7
17
4
18
50
119
6
972,923
213,725
210,076
190,816
19,260
3,649
30,412
9,519
0
(D)
1,306
4,094
1,837
(D)
(D)
(D)
14,764
14,764
0
(D)
(D)
(D)
172,394
4,497
1,922
10,465
12,454
15,993
35,365
31,059
29,617
(D)
60,639
33,476
3,227
0
23,316
5,419
12,874
5,023
6,933
16,393
5,419
799
4,620
2,143
8,346
78,~94
1,331
18,639
4,223
4,154
3,725
429
69
937
293
0
0-19
48
124
66
20-99
20-99
0-19:
504:
504:
0:
0-19:
20-95~
100-24
4,95~
50
35
111
301
181
3,289
279
267
0-19
0-19
710
458
25
0
284
71
147
66
149
222
58
13
45
9
39
1!~
1,9
19,
783
784
7~2
793
79 ex 792,3;84
8O
801
8O2
8O3
804
8O5
8O6
807,8,9
81
823,4,9
83
835
832,3,6,9
87 ex 8733
87i
872
873 ex 8733
874
89
Movie theaters
Video tape rental
Thea prod(ex pic),band
Bowling centers
Comm sport,other amuse
Health services
Offices/clinics,dr med
Office/clinic dentists
Office/clinic dr osteo
Office/clinic otb prac
Nursing/personal care
Hospitals
Other health services
Legal services
Select educational serv
Social services
Child day care service
Other social services
Engineer,acct,res,mgmnt
Englneer,architect,sur
Acc:lng,audit,bookkeep
Res,devel,test,ex nonc
Mgmnt and PR services
Services, n.e.c.
3
17
3
1
89
380
180
82
2
63
7
1
45
147
15
50
32
18
260
68
97
4
91
13
(D)
4,840
(D)
67,451
239,583
130,024
28,022
(D)
12,341
22,987
(D)
(D)
69,678
2,282
14,265
4,195
10,070
99,941
34,290
22,318
2,128
41,205
2,380
20-99
146
20-99
20-99
1,712
3~361
1,101
355
0-19
197
865
100-249
500-999
687
43
333
184
149
1,416
622
322
17
455
24
1992 Economic Census--Manufactures
Geographic Area Series
Geography: Collier County, FL
SIC and Description
Number
of estab-
lishments
Value of
shipments
($1,000)
27
271
2711
32
34
1348
3489
Ail Manufacturing Industries
Printing and publishing
Newspapers
Newspapers
Stone, clay, and glass products
Fabricated metal products
Ordnance and accessories, n.e.c.
Ordnance and Accessories, N.E.C.
177
47
5
5
18
16
1
1
188,000
58,900
(D)
(D)
33,300
33,700
(D)
(D)
Number of
employees
2,200
600
250-499
250-499
300
500
250-499
250-499
0
AAA
. .~
c~) cO C~
II I II
Collier County Economic Development
Collier County
1992 Census of Business
Part C: Manufacturing
Total:
Food & K~n~red
Tobacco
Te~les
Apparel
Lumber/Wood Products
Fum~,r e
Pape: & Roard
Pnn~n~Pubiis,hmg
Chemicats
Petroleum
RubDec/Pla~cs
Lead, er
Cla¥/Glal4./Ceramic
Pnmary Metals
Fabricated Met~s
Machines/Computer
Electronics
Ttansporta~on Equipment
Insmumen~s
Miscellaneous
Number Value
Establishm Employing Payroll ($ Added
enta Over 20 Million)
177 19 $ 2.2 $
47 4 $ 0.6 $
18 25 0.3 $
16 25 0.5 $
($ Shipments % Value
Million) (S Million) Added
107.4 $ 188.0 57%
45.1 $ 58.9 77%
14.9 $ 33.3 45%
15.7 $ 33.7 47%
Page 3
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS
County - Collier
S%a:e - FLORIDA
- 1993
SIC
code
Industry
Total
Mid-March
employees
Payroll ($1,000)
First quarter
Annual
Total
Establish-
men%s
07--
10--
15--
20--
40--
50--
52--
60--
70--
99--
TOTAL 64,757 305,004 1,265,566
AGRICULTURAL 2,285 6,383 25,582
MINING 59 335 1,586
CONSTRUCTION 6,300 33,258 150,890
~3~UFACTURING 2,250 12,848 54,556
T~-NSPORTATiO 1,796 10,721 45,331
~OLESALE TRA 1,859 9,609 42,075
RETAIL TRADE 19,784 64,950 257,686
FINANCE, INSU 5,541 39,039 158,388
SERVICES 24,791 127,569 527,785
UNCLASSIFIED 92 292 1,687
6,571
262
9
885
211
311
1,616
88.6
2,137
74
Number of establishments by employmeDt-size class
SIC
code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99
07----
10--
15--
20--
40--
50--
52--
60--
70--
99--
3,g76 1,279 700 387
184 45 22 5
6 i 0 2
552 164 95 56
95 34 27 15
121 44 . . 31 11
194 68 31 15
753 398 242 131
619 145 79 30
1,384 377 170 122
68 3 3 0
136
1
0
15
5
1
2
62
7
43
0
SIC
code
Number of establishments by employment-size class
100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999
1000
or more
07----
I0--
15--
20--
40--
50--
52--
60--
70--
99--
78 10 3
3 2 0
0 0 0
3 0 0
3 I ' 0
3 0 0
i 0 0
29 I 0
5 I 0
31 5 3
0 0 0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, ect. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class ·
1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-~ar
pay period.
SIC Code Descriptions
:SIC '
'code'
Industry
,---- TOTAL
:07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FORESTRY, AND FISHING
:10-- MINING
:15-- CONSTRUCTION
:20-- F33UFACTURING
:40-- TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
:50-- WU~OLESALE TRADE
:52-- RETAIL TRADE
:60-- FiNaNCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE
:70-- SERVICES
:99-- UNCLASSIFIED ESTAJ~LISP2~ENTS
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
State - FLORIDA
Total
Mid-March
employees
Payroll ($1,000)
Total
:Establish-
Annual' ments
SIC
code Industry First quarter
07-- AGRICULTURAL 2,285 6,383 25,582 262
0700 Agricultural 2,236 6,095 24,372 255
0800 Forestry 33 219 947 3
0900 Fishing, hunt 16 69 263 4
Number of establishments by employment-size class
siC
code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99
07-- 184 45 22 5 1
0700 181 43 20 5 1
0800 0 2 I 0 0
09O0 3 0 Z 0 0
Number of establishments by employment-size class
SIC
code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more
07-- 3 o 2. 0 0
O7OO 3 2 0 0
O8OO 0 0 0 0
0900 0 0 0 0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class
1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March
pay period.
SIC Code Descriptions
SIC :
code: Industry
07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FORESTRY, AND FISHING
0700 Agricultural services
0800 Forestry
0900 Fishing, hunting, and trapping
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
State - FLORIDA
SIC
code Industry
10-- M!NIWG
Total
Mid-March
employees
Payroll ($1,000)
First quarter:
Annual
1,586
(D)
(D)
148
,1000 Metal mining
:1200 Coal mining
11300 Oil and gas e
11400 Nonmetallic m
59 335
0-19 (D)
0-19 (D)
9 31
20-99 (D)
Total
Establish-
ments
:
9:
4:
,SIC ......
'code 1-4 ~ 5-9 ,
,- , 10-19 : 20-49
:I0-- 6 i 0 2
:1000 1 0 0 0
:1200 1 0 O. 0
:1300 3 1 0 0
:1400 1 0 0 2
Number of establishments by employment-size class
50-99
o~
O~
0
0
0
SIC ......
code 100-249
10--
1000
1200
1300
!400
Number of establishments by employment-size class
250-499
!
. ., 500-999
1000 or more
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures
to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class
withheld
i to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March
pay period.
SIC Code Descriptions
slc :
code;
I0-- MINING
Industry
IC00 Metal mining
!200 Coal mining
1300 Oil and gas extraction
!4C0 Nonmetallic minerals, except fuels
COUNTY BU$INTS$ PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
State - FLORIDA
'SIC
:code Industry
:15-- CONSTRUCTION
Total
Mid-March
employees
6,300
Payroll ($1,000) T--
First quarter
Annual
33,258
150,890
Total
Establish-
ments
885
.1500 General contr 1,624 9,918 47,282 263
:1600 Heavy constru 531 2,852 13,232 53
11700 Special trade 4 145 20,488 90,376 569
: N~ber of establishments by employment-size class
s~c :--- -
code: 1-4 : 5-9 ~ 10-1~ : 20-49 ; 50-99
15-- 552 164 95 56 15
1500 172 52 25 11 1
1600 23 14 9 6 1:'
1700 357 98 61. 39
Number of establishments by employment-size class
SIC ...........
code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more
15-- 3 0 0 0
1500 2 '0' 0 0
1600 0 0 0 0
1700 1 0 0 0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class
figures
I to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March
pay period.
SiC Code Descriptions
SlC :
code: Industry
!5-- CONSTRUCTION
1500 General contractors and operative builders
1600 Heavy construction, except building
1700 Special trade contractors
COUNTy BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
· ~..~tate - FLORIDA
SIC
code Industry
50-- WHOLESALE TRA
5000 Wholesale tra
5100 Wholesale tra
519\ Adml~%strativ
Total
Mid-March
employees
....... Payroll ($1,000)
First quarter:
1,859 9,609 42 075
992 5,202 ' 311
500-999 23,659 !95
0-19 (D) (D) 114
._ (D) (D)
' , NUmber of establishments by employment-size class
'code:
:50-- 194
:5000 124 68
:5100 69 42 31
:519~ I 26 21 7
-- 0 9 8
0
, Total
'Establish-
Annual: men=s
SiC
code
50--
5000
5100
519\
Number of
100-249
1
0
1
0
establishments by emPloyment-size class
250-499 ,
' 500-999 ~
0.
0 0
0 0
, 50-99
'SIC '
'code~ Industry
:50-- WHOLESALE TRADE
15000 Wholesale trade - durable goods
15100 Wholesale trade - nondurable goods
1519\ Administrative and auxiliary
2
1
1
0
1000 or more
0;
--- o 0 o:
Excludes govemmen~ em~lo ...... 0 0'
Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companieS.size class gures '
1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during M/d-March
pay period. ~ z=es, self-emPloyed Persons, ect. (D)denotes fi
SIC Code Descriptions
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
State - FLORIDA
SIC
code
Industry
Payroll ($1,000)
Total:
Mid-March:
employees: Firs% quarter
Annual
Total
Establish-
ments
52-- RETAIL TRADE
5200 Building mate
5300 General merch
5400 Food stores
5500 Automotive de
5600 Apparel and a
5700 Furniture and
5800 Eating and dr
5900 Miscellaneous
'.99\ Administra~iv
19,784 64,950 257,686
795 3,692 16,777
1,507 4,841 22,366
3,687 9,948 40,016
1,512 8,056 36,105
1,800 5,319 20,184
1,330 6,913 27,144
6,955 17,775 61,043
2,150 8,041 32,419
48 365 1,632
1,616
66
22
159
139
233,
217:
389:
382:
9:
: Number of establishments by emplcymen~-size class
szc :
codel 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99
52----
5200
5300
5400
5500
5600
5700
5800
5900
599\
753 398 242 131 62
29 20 9 4 3
5 2 3 2 0
55 48 28 7 8
53 50 18 13 3
99 75 48 8 3
125 56 . 26 8 2
136 65 ' 73 70 41
247 78 36 19 2:
4 4 I 0
: Number of establishments by employment-size class
szc : .....
code: 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more
52-- 29 I 0 0
5200 1 0 0 0
5300 10 0 0 0
5400 12 I 0
5500 2 0 0 ~,
5600 0 0 0 0
5700 0 0 0 0
5800 4 0 0 0
5~00 0 0 0 0
599\ 0 0 0 0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class
1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll bu= no employees during Mid-March
pay period.
_~.~SIC Code Descriptions
SIC :
code: Industry
52-- RETAIL TRADE
5200 Building materials and garden supplies
5300 General merchandise stores
5400 Food stores
5500 Automotive dealers and service stations
5600 Apparel and accessory stores
5700 Furniture and homefurnishings stores
5800 Eating and drinking places
5900 Miscellaneous retail
599\ Administrative and auxiliary
COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993
County - Collier
5tare - FLORIDA
SlC ~
code: Industry
60-- FINANCE, INSU
Total
Mid-March
employees
Payroll ($1,000)
First quarter
Annual
Total
Establish-
ments
886
6000 Depository in
6100 Nond~pository
6200 Security and
6300 Insurance car
6400 Insurance age
6500 Real estate
6700 Holding and o
679\ Admlnistratlv
5,541 39,039 158,388
1,613 10,671 41,680
20-99 (D) (D)
304 5,778 24,111
74 976 3,953
501 3,447 13,447
2,475 12,065 48,905
469 5,237 21,777
20-99 (D) (D)
89
30
50.
25:
96:
SIC
code
60----
...... Number of establishments by emplo.vment-size class
1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 J 20-49 : 50-99
619
145
79
30
6000 25 28 26 4
6100 24 4 2 0
6200 31 11 3 5
6300 22 I i 1
6400 65 18 6 6
6500 427 78 38
6700 25 5 . 3 1
679\ 0 0 ' 0 1
SIC ....... Number of establishments by employment-size class
code 100-249 ~ 250-499 .
--- . 500-999 : 1000 or more
60-- 5 I 0 0
6000 2 i 0 0
6100 0 0 0 0
6200 0 0 0 0
63OO 0 0 0 0
6400 0 0 0 0
65O0 1 0 0 0
3:
0:
0:
0:
1:
3
o
0
6700 2 0 0
679\ 0 0 0
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class
! to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March
pay period.
SIC Code Descriptions
'sic :
: code: Industry
60-- FINkNCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE
6000 Depository institutions
6100 Nondepository institutions
6200 Security and commodity brokers
6300 Insurance carriers
6400 Insurance agents, brokers, and service
6500 Real estate
6700 Holding and other investment offices
679\ Admlnistrat~ve and auxiliary
COUNTY BUSINESS
States To%als
State - FLORIDA
PATTERNS
- 1993
SIC
code: Industry
: Payroll
:
Total:
Mid-March:
employees: First quarter
($1,ooo)
Annual
Total:
Establish-:
me~%s'
.... TOTAL 4,805,683 24,067,759 104,103,205
07-- AGRICULTURAL 51,012 172,605 757,960
10-- MINING 7,267 57,465 250,142
15-- CONSTRUCTION 288,542 1,420,179 6,348,342
20-- ~-LNUFACTURING 477,485 3,104,275 13,029,960
40-- T.~ANSPORTATIO 293,148 2,079,195 8,737,665
50-- WHOLESALE TRA 296,822 1,952,565 8,440,831
52-- R/TAIL TR~E 1,193,568 3,741,799 15,882,449
60-- FINANCE, INSU 375,856 2,547,913 10,574,906
70-- SERVICES 1,817,106 8,978,641 40,012,116
99-- UNCLASSIFIED 4,877 13,122 68,834
384,727
7,878
298
35,945
16,805
14,692
31,821
90,103
40,583
142,117
4,485
Nmmber of establishments by emp!cyme.nt-size class
SIC
code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99
.... 223,078 75,179 43,296 27,026
07-- 5,345 1,394 736 279
!0-- 142 46 39 40
15-- 22,048 6,658 4,160 2,311
20-- 7,335 3,158 2,498 2,064
40-- 8,531 2,355 . 1,541 1,220
50-- 18,364 6,095 ° 4,059 2,390
52-- 42,871 21,656 11,911 8,482
60-- 26,239 7,037 4,068 2,211
70-- 88,002 26,580 14,220 8,009
99-- 4,201 200 64 20
9,175
74
12
522
841
534
615
3,217
626:
2,734:
o:
SIC
code
Number of es%abllshments by employment-size class
100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999
1000
or more
.... 5 , 331 1,023 367
07-- 35 13 2
10-- 17 1 0
15-- 199 38 6
20-- 610 187 72
40-- 362 84 37
50-- 245 41 10
52-- 1,797 137 27
60-- 280 78 28
70-- 1,786 444 185
9~-- 0 0 0
252
0
1
3
4O
28
2
16
157
0
Excludes gove~ment employees, self-employed persons, ect. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for indiv~dual companies.Size class ·
I to 4 includes establishments hav~ng payroll but no employees during Mid-Mar
'%,.- pay period.
SIC Code Descriptions
SIC :
code: Industry
.... TOTAL
07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FOPdgSTRY, AND FISHING
10-- MINING
15-- CONSTRUCTION
20-- MANUFACTURING
40-- TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
50-- WHOLESALE TRADE
52-- RETAIL TRADE
60-- FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND PEAL ESTATE
70-- SERVICES
99-- UNCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
Number of establishments by employment-size class
s~c
code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more
20----
2000
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
3000
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
399\
3 I 0 ;-~
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0:
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0:
Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures
withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class
1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March
pay period. · -
SIC Code Descriptions
sic :
code: Industry
20-- M-MfUFACTURING
2000 Food and kindred products
2200 Textile mill products
2300 Apparel and other textile products
2400 Lumber and wood products
2500 Furniture and fixtures
2600 Paper and allied products
2700 Printing and publishing
2800 Chemicals and allied products
3000 Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products
3200 Stone, clay, and glass products
3300 Primary metal industries
3400 Fabricated metal products
3500 Industrial machinery and equipment
3600 Electronic and other electronic equipmen~
3700 Transportation equipment
3800 Instruments and related products
3900 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries
399\ Administrative and auxiliary
/%)
4,4
(~
~,)
(~
d~
0
0
c
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
¢o~r ¢ou~ Economic Develo~meel
Collier County
Income Range Compaflslon
1990
Florida % Collier
Total Households S,134J$9 100.0% Sl,703
Under $S,OOO 313,672 6% 2,352
SS-IO,O00 459,023 9% 2,020
S 10-15,000 509,063 10% 4,470
S15-2S,000 1,031,665 20% 10,~3
S2S~S,O~ 8~g,g~o 1~4 10,920
S3S-~,000 882.668 1~ 11,730
S~-7S.~0 6~0,756 13% 9,307
S7S400,~0 2~0.036 4% 3.~87
S ~ oo.~ ~,~o ~ 18,~0 ~ 2.782
S1~-2~,~0 47,~3 I% 1.493
S2~-~0,~ ~,~62 0% ~12
S~o.oo~ 9.868 ~ 481
Median Income: S 27,S14 S 34,110
Income Range Compartslon
1996
Floricla % Collier
Total Households $.733.376 100% 76,0~
U~er SS.~ 2~,571 4% 2~32
S~0~ ~8,~23 8% 3.525
$I0-1S,~ ~8.4gg 8% 4.339
S~2S.~ 0~8.~25 17% ~1,451
S2~S,~ 913,075 16% 12.410
S3~.~ 1,020.~4 18% 15,161
S~-75.~ 931.318 16% 13.~9
$100-1~,~ 216~01 4%
S1~.2~,~0 55.633 I% 1,574
$2~.~0,0~ 27,4~ 0% 1,058
$~,~ 13,982 .~ 678
Median Income S 31,981 $ 38,T76
Income Range CompaHsion
2001
%
100.0%
4%
5%
7%
18%
18%
19%
15%
5%
I%
I%
124.~%
%
100%
3%
6%
15%
16%
2¢%
18%
8%
6%
2%
1%
1%
121.2%
Flor~cla % Collier
Total Households 6,199,S2S 100% 87,~S 100%
Under S$,000 219.296 4% 2.153 2%
$5-10,000 479.~4 8% 4.{~
S10-15,000 450.190 ~/. 4,104
S15-25,000 947,827 15% 11,4~1 13%
S2S-3S,000 g36,g76 15% 12.6S4 14%
S35-S,0,000 1,076,950 17% 17.202 20%
S50-75,000 1,144,594 18% 18.123 21%
$75-100,000 480.000 8% 7,797
S100-150,000 347,053 6% 6.395 7%
$1~0-25~),000 69.697 1% 1,791 2%
S2 S0..~00,000 30.521 0% 1,054 I%
$ 5~o,ooo+ 16.857 0% 778 1
Median Income: S 35.7~1 S 42,321
118 3%
S~te V~c ~
-2.3%
-4.2%
-2.7%
-2.4%
0.8%
1.8%
2.2%
1.4%
2.2%
1
I
0.6%
-1
-3.5%
-2.5%
-2 3%
04%
2.0%
1.6%
1.6%
2.0%
1.1%
0.9%
0.6%
Oifff re~'~
-1.1%
-3.1%
-2.6%
-2.2%
-0.6%
2.3%
2.2%
1.2%
1.7%
0.9%
0.7%
0.6%
E
E
Page 6
Collier Counly Economic Development
Collier County
Household Age Group Comparision
By Age of HouseholCer
1990
Florida % Collier % I~ffer~c~
Total Households 5,134,859 100% $%703 100%
Under 25 258,204 5% 2,411 4% -1.1%
25 to 35 976,502 19% 9,927 18% -2.9%
35 to 45 977,174 19% 10,239 17% .2.4%
45 to 55 725,561 14% 8,109 13% -1.0%
55 to 60 329,188 8% 4,128 7% 0.11%
60 to 65 389,275 8% 5,749 9% 1.7%
65 to 70 4110,929 8% 6,809 11% 2.6%
70 to 75 403,625 8% 6,095 10% 2.0%
75 to 80 315,456 6% 5,095 10% 3.7%
80 to 65 204,191 4% 2,~.14 4% 0.3%
85* 124,763 2% 1.311 2% -03%
Household Age Group Compartsion
Age of Householder
1996
Florida % Collier %
Total Households 5,733,375 100% 76,022 100%
Under 25 275,1194 5% 2,809 4% .1.1%
25 to 35 967,912 17% 10,752 14% -2,7%
35 to 45 1,113,1182 19% 12,528 17% -2.5%
45 to 55 9116,484 16% 11,557 15% -1.1%
55 to 60 352,870 5% 5,021 7% 0
60 to 65 383,107 7% 6.307 8% 1.5%
65 to 7O 452,475 8% 8,118 11% 2.5%
70 to 75 435,070 8% 7.252 10% 2.0%
75 to 80 381,588 7% 5,787 8% 1.0%
80 to 85 256,093 '4% 3,579 5% 0.4%
85* 157,901 3% 1,902 3% -0.3%
Souse' Clanta$ In¢
Household Age Group Comparision
By Age of Householder
2001
Florida % Collier % I:~tr~'~e
Total Households 6,199,525 100% 87,565 100%
Under 25 297,864 5% 3.224 4% -1.1%
25 to 35 899,552 15% 10,523 12% -2.5%
35 to 45 1,195,056 19% 14,528 17% -2.7%
45 to 55 1,143,6~g 18% 15.014 17% -1.3%
55 to 60 443,392 7% 6,493 7% 0.3%
60 to 65 414,939 7% 7.253 8% 1.5%
65 to 70 459,943 7% 8,708 10% 2.5%
70 to 75 448,405 7% 7.999 9% 1.9%
75 to 80 426,852 7% 6,899 8% 1.0%
80 to 85 283,537 5% 4,370 5% 0.4%
85+ 185,316 3% 2,454 3% -0.2%
Page 7
l[lill
ll[tttlltlillltl lltlltlllt iii ti!
Collier Cour~ Economic Deveropment
Table: Employment One
Collier County Employment
Employment by Year
1991 1992 1993 1994
1995
Industry
A gnc u~Jra [/F or e~'y/F ~,hjn g 12,311 12,919 't3,209 11.697 10,683
~.;i~,~g 68 65 58 54 35
Con$~'IJc~on 6,411 5.657 6,317 6,924 7,206
M=n~.c.~v~ 2,286 2,025 2,018 2,195 2,299
Tra nst3 orta ~on/C o m mumca ~ons/Public L,~li~e$ 1,914 1.886 1,933 1,913 2.027
wh¢~sale Traoe 1,650 1.742 1,645 1.790 1,973
ReTail Tra(3e 15,504 15,9~0 17.117 18,298 18,795
F~na nce~l n~urance~R e =,1 Estate 4,512 4,513 4.774 4,670 4,541
Senates 21,204. 20,714 22,102 23.115 24,451
c~oYernrnen~ 6,785 6.961 7,168 7,562 7,844
Total: 72,~.45 72,472 76.341 78,215 79,~55
Source Fl(:n'da De~a~nent of Le~o~' and Employment Secure'y, E$.202Progra~1
Page 1
Collier County Economic Development
Table: Employment Four
Collier County Employment
Average Wages
le91 19~2 le~a 1ss4
Industry
A gric~ Ir a VF o~es~',f/F~h~ng $ 8,067
Mining $ 33,488
con~uc=on $ 23.258
Menufactunng $ 24 001
Trens~oocLa:,~o~CommunlCa~Or'ts/~t/blic U'dli'oes $ 23,~74
Wholesale Trade $ 28,363
Ret3il Trade $ 14,116
Finance/In~urance./Real Es,ate $ 29,531
settees S 21,127
C;overnment $ 26,204
Total: $ 18,197
9,046 $ 9.142 $ 9,991
33,606 $ 39,241 $ 38,710
24.125 $ 24,875 $ 25.170
25,958 $ 26,447 $ 29,194
25,388 $ 26,172 $ 26.778
30.692 $ 29,818 S 31.862
14,768 $ 15.306 $ 15.409
33,025 $ 35,101 $ 34,889
22,431 $ 23,449 $ 24,503
27,8c~4 $ 28,027 $ 27,963
19,222 $ 19,941$ 20,896
$ 22.485 $ 23,053
To:al less Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing $ 20,522 $ 21,720'
$curce F/cn~a De=a,.,'.,"ne~,t of Labor anti Employmenf Secun~y. ES.2C2Prcg~am
Table: Employment Five
Collier County Employment
Average Wages by Quarter ~995
First Second Third Fourth
Industry Jan-Feb-Mat A0t-Ma~t-June Ju~Aug. Sept Oc'l-Nov. Oe¢
Agdcu/turaFForesm//F"rs~ing $ 2..487 $ 2,677 S 3,189 S 2,536
Mining $ 8,236 $ 7,849 $ 7,658 $ 6,286
Cor~'ruc~on $ 6,402 $ 6,359 $ 6,278 $ 6,778
Manufacturing $ 7,316 $ 7,086 $ 6,807 $ 8,133
Transpor'~a',~o~Communical:ioca./Put)licU'aT~es $ 7,058 $ 6,875 $ 6,967 $ 6,963
Wholesale Trade $ 7,014 $ 8,224 $ 8,226 $ 9,218
Retail Trade $ 3,923 $ 3,928 S 3,834 S 4,206
Financa!lnsurance/RealE~ate S 9,434 $ 11.422 $ 9,185 S 9,695
Se~ces S 5,899 $ 6,427 S 5,926 $ 7,275
Government $ 6,485 $ 8,181 $ 6,431 S 7,336
Total: $ 5,140 $ 5,586 $ 5,511 $ 5,891
Scurce Fioc,'a DeDa~,,~ent of Labor and Employment Secu~.~y, ES.202=,"c~,'~m
C
C
1990 Census of Population and Housing
040 Florida
~._ 050 Collier County
URB~.N AND RURAL P~SIDENCE
Total population ...............................................
Urban population ..............
i ......
Percent of total popu ...... ' ....................
Rural population ....................................................
Percent of total population .....................................
Farm population ...................................................
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
Per~ons 3 years and over enrolled in school.
Preprimary school ...................
Elementary or high school ..............................
Percent in private school ........ ' .................
College .................................
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Persons 25 years and over .........................................
Less than 9th grade .................................................
9th to 12th grade, no diploma .....................
High school graduate .......... : .......... ' .................
Some college, no degree. ' ..........................
Associates degree. ' ...........................................
Bachelor's degree.' .................................................
Graduate cr professional degree. ' ........... : .....................
Percent high school graduate or higher ....
Percent b%chelor's degree or higher. ' .........................
RESIDENCE IN 1985
Persons 5 years and over ...............
Lived in same house ........ ' ......................
Lived in different house in U.S ........ o .............................
Same State ........................................................
Same county .....................................................
Different county ...........................
Different State ............. ''''
Lived abroad ........................................................
DISABILITY OF CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS
Persons 16 to 64 years ........................................
................... .....
W~=~ a sel~-care limitation .......................................
Wish a work disability ..............................................
In labor force .............................................
Prevented from working ................................ ~.~ ..... ~.~
Persons 65 years and over .....................................
with a mobility or self-care limitation .............................
Wi%h a mobility limitation ............................
W!'~ a se~ care limitation ................... ' ...........
Pag.
152,09
118,10
77.
33,99
22.
31
27,49
2,30'
20,03:
5.!
$,14~
110,30~
9,22~
13,902
33,254
22,813
6,475
16,428
8,209
79!l
22.~
143,129
56,736
82,200
43,630
33,247
10,383
38,570
4,193
89,184
2,944
1,445
2,119
6,274
2,768
2,797
33,875
3,842
2,810
2,367
1990 Census of Popula=!on and Housing
040 Florida
050 Collier Ccun=y
CHILDREN EVER BORN PER 1,000 WOrN
Women 15 to 24 years ................................................
Women 25 to 34 years ................................................
Women 35 to 44 years ................................................
VETEr~AN STATUS
Civilian veterans 16 years and over ............................. ~...
65 years and over .................................................
NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH
Native po;ulation ...................................................
Percent born in state of residence ..............................
Fcrelgn-born population .............................................
Entered the U.S. 1980 to 1990 .....................................
LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Perscns 5 years and over ........................................
Speak a language other than English .................................
Do not speak English 'very well'. ...............................
Speak Spanish .....................................................
Do not speak English 'very well'. ...............................
Speak Asian or Pacific Island language ....... ' ......................
Dc not speak English 'very well'. ...............................
~NCESTRY
Total ancestries reported .........................................
Arab ................................................................
Austrian ............................................................
Belgian .............................................................
Canadian ............................................................
Czech ............................... , ................................
Danish ..............................................................
Dutch ...............................................................
English .............................................................
Finnish .............................................................
FrEnch (excep~ Basque) ..............................................
French Canadian .....................................................
German ..............................................................
Greek ...............................................................
Hungarian... ........................................................
Irish ...............................................................
Italian .............................................................
Lithuanian ..........................................................
Norwegian ...........................................................
Polish ..............................................................
Portuguese ..........................................................
Romanian ............................................................
Russian .............................................................
Scotch-Irish ........................................................
Page 2
352
1,275
1,923
23,408
10,276
136,196
21.2
15,903
8,185
143,12g
24,629
11,687
17,229
8,864
230
105
183,471
353
264
815
812
908
4,295
27,813
435
7,349
1,508
36,305
670
1,420
26,111
10,580
682
2,071
5,010
40!
201
1,496
4,354
1990 Census of Population and Housing
040 Florida
050 Collier County
Scottish ...............
Suhsaharan African ..................................................
Swedish ........... ~ .................................................
Swiss ...............................................................
Ukrainian ...........................................................
United States or American ...........................................
Welsh ...............................................................
West Indian (excluding Hispanic origin groups) ......................
Yugoslavian .........................................................
Other ancestries ....................................................
Page
!
4,994
1,451
79
3,272
722
292
5,358
1,717
2,286
354
28,595
1990 Census of Population and Housing
040 Florida
050 Collier County
LABOR FORCE STATUS
Persons 16 years and over ...........................
In labor force ......................................................
Percent in labor force ........................................
Civilian labor force ..............................................
Employed ........................................................
Unemployed ......................................................
Percent unemployed ............................................
Armed Forces ..........
Not in labor force ...... ][ii[ .......................................
Males 16 years and over .......................................
In labor force ......................................................
Percent in labor force .......................................
Civilian labor force '
Employed .........................
Unemployed ..................... ' .......... ] ...................
Percent unemployed ........... i]i]i~]][~[.~][[~]]~[]~]~]~]~
Armed Forces .....................
Not in labor force. ' ................................
Females 16 years and over ............... ~ .....................
In labor force .................................... . ...................
Percent in labor force
Civilian labor force ........................................
Unemployed .......................
Percent unemployed ............................................
Armed Forces ......................................................
Not in labor force ..................................................
Females 16 years and over .....................................
With own children under 6 years ..........................
Percent in labor force ............................................
With own children 6 to 17 years only ....................
Percent in labor force ............................................
Own children under 6 years in families and subfamilies...
Al! parents present in household in labor force .....................
Own children 6 to 17 years in families and subfamilies ..........
All parents present in household in labor force .....................
Persons 16 to 19 years ..........................................
Not enrolled in school and not high school graduate .................
Employed or in Armed Forces .......................................
Unemp!oved.
Not in labor force .......................................
Page i
124,687
71,325
57.2
71,232
68,449
2,783
3.9
93
53,362
61,306
39,634
64.6
39,541
38,069
1,472
3.7
93
21,672
63,381
31,691
50.0
31,691
30,380
1,311
4.1
0
31,690
63,381
7,313
66.0
7,403
80.2
10,401
6,703
18,399
13,562
6,059
946
585
53
3O8
1990 Census of Population and Eousing
040 Florida
050 Collier County
COMMUTING TO WORK
Workers 16 years and over .........................................
Percent drove alone .................................................
Percent in carpools .................................................
Percent using public transpor%ation .................................
Percent using other means ...........................................
Percent walked or worked at home ....................................
Mean travel time to work (minutes) ..................................
OCCUPATION
Employed persons 16 years and over ................................
Executive, administrative, and managerial occupations ...............
Professional specialty occupations ..................................
Technicians and related support occupations .........................
Sales occupations ...................................................
Administrative suppor~ occupations, including clerical ..............
Private household occupations .......................................
Protective service occupations ......................................
Service occupations, except protec:ive and household ................
Farzlng, forestry, and fishing occupations ..........................
Precision production, craft, and repair occupations .................
Machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors .......................
Transportation and material moving occupations .......................
Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and laborers .................
INDUSTRY
Employed person 16 years and over .................................
Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ................................
Mining ' . .......................
Cons%ruction ........................................................
Manufacturing, ncndurable goods .....................................
Manufacturing, durable goods ......... . ...............................
Transportation ......................................................
Communications and other public utilities ...........................
Wholesale trade .....................................................
Re~all trade .............................................. ~ .........
Finance, insurance, and real estate ..................... ~ ...........
Business and repair services ........................................
Persona! services ...................................................
Entertainment, and recreation services ..............................
Health services .....................................................
Educational services ................................................
Other professional and related services .............................
Public administration ...............................................
Page 2
67,195
74.0
16.1
1.8
1.3
6.0
18.8
68,449
9,168
6,828
1,764
9,755
9,312
388
1,455
9,277
4,800
8,818
1,744
2,397
2,743
68,44~
5,251
180
8,517
1,237
2,105
2,282
1,318
1,960
13,630
7,219
3,570
4,811
2,201
4,454
3,155
4,014
2,545
1990 Census of Population and Housing
040 Florida
050 Collier County
CLASS OF WORKER
Employed persons 16 years and over ................................
Private wage and salary workers .....................................
Government workers ..................................................
Local government workers ..........................................
State government workers ..........................................
Federal government workers ........................................
Self-employed workers ...............................................
Unpaid far ily workers ...............................................
Page
68,449
55,344
6,743
4,897
1,069
777
5,902
454
1990 Cert.~
040
050
INCOME I
Househ¢
Less %ha!
55,000 t(
510,000
515,000
$25,000
$35,000
$50,000
575,000
$150,000
Median h~
Famil
Less tha
$5,000
$I0,000
$15,000
$25,000
$35,000
550,000
$75,000
5100,000
$150,000
Median f~
Less
$5,000
$10,000 ti
$15,000 ti
$25,000 ti
535,000 ti
550,000 t~
$75,000
$!00,000
5150,000
Median no
Per capit
of Population and Housing
;rtda
~lller County
989
sg,ggg ....................................................
514,999 ..................................................
$24,ggg ..................................................
534,999 ..................................................
$4g,ggg ..................................................
574,ggg ..................................................
5gg,ggg ..................................................
$!49,999 ................................................
r more ....................................................
;ehold income (dollars) ...................................
more ....................................................
ly income (dollars) ......................................
households ..............................................
5,000 ........ : ...........................................
99....................................................
$14,999 ..................................................
$24,999 .................. % ...............................
$34,999 ..................................................
$49,999 ..................................................
$74,999 ..................................................
599,999 ..................................................
$!49,999 ................................................
more ....................................................
household income (dollars) .........................
(dollars) .........................................
Page I
61,646
2,360
2,945
4,463
10,977
10,937
11,710
9,270
3,355
2,764
2,865
34,001
44,136
1,123
1,300
2,545
7,046
7,793
8,960
7,653
2,894
2,325
2,497
38,42t
17,510
1,387
1,802
2,028
4,032
3,103
2,609
1,348
412
425
364
23,317
21,386
1990 Cen:
040 Fl,
O5O
INCOME
HCU
With wage
Mean wa
With ncnf
Mean noi
With farm
Mean fa
With Soci
Mean $o¢
With Dub
Mean pul
With re:
Mean re'
PCVERTY
Al! per:
Below
Persons 1
Below
Persons
Below
Related
Below
Related
Below
Related
Below
Unrelated
Below
All fam
Below
With re!
Below
With rel
Below
Female h
Below
With re!a~
Below
With rel
Below
of Population and Housing
~ida
:ollier County
IN 19~9
salary income .........................................
and salary income (dollars) .............................
!m self-employment income .................................
~arm self-employment income (dollars) .....................
elf-employment income ....................................
self-employment income (dollars) ........................
Security income .........................................
Security income (dollars) .............................
assls=ance income .......................................
assistance income (dollars) ...........................
~ment income ..............................................
[remen= income (dollars) ..................................
IN 1989
for whom poverty status is determined .................
overty level .............................................
,ears and over ...........................................
level ............................................
5 'ears and over .........................................
level ..............................................
under 18 years .....................................
level .............................................
hildren under 5 years ....................................
ty level .............................................
hlldren 5 to 17 years ....................................
level .............................................
iduals .................. . .............................
level
)verty .........................................
children under 18 years ................................
;verty level .............................................
ed children under 5 years ...............................
verty level .............................................
seholder families .......................................
verty level .............................................
children under 18 years ................................
verty level .............................................
:ed children under 5 years ...............................
verty level .............................................
Page 2
61,646
41,411
38,094
8,84O
27,001
652
11,629
23,721
9,661
2,066
4,753
13,963
16,284
149,934
15,762
120,072
10',144
33,875
1,712
29,678
5,482
8,801
1,744
20,877
3,738
26,137
5,087
44,136
2,829
16,036
2,219
7,144
1,286
4,161
916
2,668
871
916
467
1990 Cen.
040 Fi,
050
of Population and Housing
ier County
ent below poverty level:
Page
All
Persons
Perso
Related
Relat
Relat~
Ail lam
With re
With
Female
With re
With
65 'ears and over .......................................
under 18 years ...................................
children under 5 years ..................................
children 5 to 17 years ..................................
individuals .............................................
children under ...........
~lated children under 5 3rears .............................
r families .........................................
children under 18 years ..............................
ilated children under 5 years .............................
10.5
8.4
5.1
18.5
19.8
17.9
19.5
6.4
13.8
18.0
22.0
32.6
51.0
1990 Cer
O4O
O5O
To
YEAR
1989 to
!985 to
1980 to
1970 to
1960 to
1950 to
1940 to
1939 or
BEDROOMS
No bedro(
1 bedro¢
2 bedro¢
3 bedro,
4 bedr¢
5 or mcr~
SELECTED
Lacking
Lacking c
Condcmini
SOURCE
Public sy
Individua
Individua
Some o~he
SEWAGE
Public
Septic
Other mea
HOUSE HEA
Utility g~
Bottled, t
Electrici
Fuel oil
Coal cr
Wood .....
Solar ene
Other fuell
No fuel us~
of Population and Mousing
rida
Collier County
housing units ...........................................
BUILT
itch 1990 ..................................................
;88 ........................................................
79
49.
i;;iiii: .......... i .....................................
RISTIC$
plumbing facilities ................................
:plete kitchen facilities ............ . .....................
housing units ........................ ' ...................
em or private company ....................................
drilled well .............................................
dug well .................................................
source ...................................................
or cesspool .............................................
housing units ........................................
FUEL
· or LP gas ............................................
· etc ......... .. .' .
Page
71255
19,980
21,127
30,099
10,760
3,416
727
80!
1,484
9,545
46,845
30,800
4,803
688
3O6
336
35,064
84,750
8,815
401
199
74,265
19,311
589
61,703
882
2,005
57,441
430
5
212
36
17
675
1990 Ce:
040
O50
I~EAR HO[
1989 to
1985 to
1980 to
1970 to
1960 to
1959 or
s of Population and Housing
rida
Collier County
HOLDER MO'WED INTO UNIT
'ch 1990 ..................................................
184 o °o o o
Lrlier .....................................................
Page
!
16,42(
23,03~
9,63:
10,26~
1,84~
50'
No telep
VEHIC
Occupi
None
3 or
Specifie,
With a
Less
$300
$500
$700
$1,0~
$I,
$2,
Med:
No%
Less
$I00
$200
$300
$400
Medll
SELECTED
Specifie~
Less
20 to 2'
25 to 2
30 to 3
35
No~ com
ne in unit ................................................
2,961
housing units ............................................
61,70~
3,23~
25,68~
25,58~
7,18~
AND SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS
owner-occupied housing units ..............................
iortgage ...................................................
ihan $300 ..................................................
$4
.o 99............... ...............
o $699 ................................. ' ...................
o $999 ....................................................
to $1,499 ................................................
to $1,999 ................................................
or more .................................................
(dollars) .... · ............................................
;aged .....................................................
hah $100 ..................................................
$199 .....................
$299 .................... : ...............................
$399 ....................................................
more ....................................................
(dollars) ................................................
25,811
16,862
533
1,936
3,653
4,965
1,320
821
8,949
397
2,532
2,089
1,539
2,392
269
.NTHLY OWN'ER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD
wner-occupied housing units '
20 percent ..............................................
percent ..................................................
percent ..................................................
percent ..................................................
~t or more ................................................
.ed......................................................
INCOME IN 1989
25,811
14,320
3,245
2,344
1,467
4,166
239
1990 Cen:
040 Fll
05O
GROSS
Specified
Less %h
$200 to
$300 to
$500 to
$750 tO
$1,000
No cash
Median
GROSS
Specified
Less
20 to 24
25 to 2!
30 to
35
Not com
of Population and Housing
'ida
lollier County
enter-occupied housing units .............................
$200 ....................................................
~299 ......................................................
99......................................................
1749 ......................................................
;999 ......................................................
more ....................... · ........
~.nt . ~:~.~:.~.~..~.~.~ .~ . : · ·
A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1989
enter-occupied housing units .............................
20 percent ..............................................
)ercent ............. .... ............... . .................
~ercent ..................................................
~ercent ..................................................
it or more ................................................
ired ......................................................
Page 3
18,251
743
974
4,300
7,935
1,955
1,445
899
572
18,251
5,337
2,507
2,345
1,632
5,273
1,157