Agenda 03/18/1997 R COLLeCt COUNT~
Tuead&y, ~arch 1~, 1997
9:00 a.~.
~TI~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AT LF~T 13 DAYS
~ P~ ~O DIC~f ~ AP~ A DECISION
~L ~GIS~ P~LIC fP~R~ ~LL ~E L~I~ ~
{5) H~S ~ESS P~I~SION FOR ~DITIO~ T~
~SI3T~ LIBT~NO D~CES FOR ~ ~ ~AI~
AVAI~LE IN ~ CO~ CO~SSIO~RS' OFFICE
L~ RECESS SC~ FOR 12~00 N~N TO 1~00 P.M.
1. INVOCATIQ~
2. PLF-DGE OF ALLEGIA.NC~
3. APPROVAL OF A~ENDA ARD CONSENT AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINIIT$~
February 25, 1997 - Regular meeting.
5. ~RQCLA/~ATIONS A~ID SERVICF~
A.
(1) Proclamation recognizing Continental Cablevision as &
provider of family valued programming and
entertainment by offering the Disney channel with
basic service. To be accepted, by Edward Garcia,
Government and Community Relations Manager and Mickey
Mouse.
(2) Proclamation designating March 23-29, 1997 as'Public
Library Volunteer Week. To be accepted by Fran Hays,
Volunteer Coordinator; Anne Schuch, representing
Headquarters Library; Bob Smith, representing Marco
Island Branch; Frances Lease, representing Collier
North Branch; Charles Wright, representing Eas=
Naples Branch and Owen Hayes. representing ~olden
Gate Branch.
(3) Proclamation designating March 12, 1997, as Naples
Woman's Club Day.
E. Service Award~
C. Presentation!
March 18, 1997
6. APPROVAL OF CL~K'S P~P0~T
A. ANALYSIS OF C~ANGZS ~ R~SZRVES FOR CONTINGENCIES
1. General Fund (001)
2. Community Development Fund (113}
3. Facilities Construction Fund (301)
7. PUBLIC PETITIO~
A. Robert D. Nadeau, Executive Director, representing the
July 4th Festival {Naples Junior Chamber, Inc.) regarding
the upcoming July 4th Festival at Sugden Regional Pork.
B. Frank Balogh, Vice Chair, Chamber/£DC Coalition Disaster
Recovery Committee, regarding the Post-Disaster Re-Entry
Identification Program.
8. ~QUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
A. COmPliCITy DEVELOPM]D{T & ENVIRONMENTAL S£R~CE~
(1) Community Development and Environmental Services
Division staff presenting the 1996 annual report of
the Development Services Advisory Committee.
(2) Staff review and recommendations relative to
Ordinance 90-7, also know~ as the Crestwood PUD
which, according to the required PUD Status Report
submitted by the property owner/agent, has not
commenced construction es defined in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(3) Staff review and recommendations relative to
Ordinance 90-6, as amended, also known as Neapolitan
Park PD-D which, according to the required pUD Status
Report submitted by the property owner/agent, has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(4) Staff review and recommendations relative to
Ordinance 91-88, also known as The Vincentian
Residence PUD, which according to the required PUD
Status Report submitted by the property owner/agent,
has not commenced construction as defined in Section
2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(5) Staff review and recommendations relative to
Ordinance 91-31, also known as The Waterford Estates
Pb~, which according to the required PUD Status
Report submitted by the property owner/agent, has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(6) Request the Board of County Commissioners approve a
Resolution establishing local requirements and
procedures for amending the Collier County Land
Development Code and repealing Resolution No. 93-124.
March 18, 1997
(?) Staff review and re¢o~nendations relative to
Ordinance 90-69, ae amended, ales known as the A~tron
Plaza PUD which, according to the required PUD Status
Report submitted by the property owner/agent, has not
co~nenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in eeveral p~ssible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(8) Staff review and reco~m~n~ations relative to
Ordinance 83-45, also known as the Weetview Plaza
PUD, which, according :0 the required pUD Status
Report sub~nitted by the property owner/agent, has no%
co~nenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in ,everal possible courses o( action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(9) Appeal of invoice and statement of account for Code
Enforcement Case No. 61113-079; owner of record
Matthew Tavtigian end Rowena Tavtigian.
(1} This item has been deleted.
C. PUBLIC SERVIC~
D. SUPPORT SERVICE~
E. COU~'Y MA. NAGEE
(1) Recommendation tO approve Advisory Boards designated
for annual review per Ordinance No. 92-44.
(2) Board authorization to waive the competitive proposal
process and au:horize staff to nego:iate a con:tact
with Henderson, Young & Company to prepare a
Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Feasibility Study.
an update of the Law Enforcement Impact Fee Ra~e
Study, and a Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Rate
Study, if feasible.
9. ~OLg~Ty ATTORNEY'S REPORT
10. ~OARD OF COUNTY CO~MISSIOWERS
A. Appointment of member to the Collier County Public Health
Unit Advisory Board.
B. Appointment of member to the Marco Island Beautification
Advisory Committee.
C. Appointment of members to the Industrial Development
Authority.
D. Appointment of member to the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board.
E. Nomination of representative from Collier County to :he
Esters Bay Agency on Bay Management. (Commissioner
Hancock)
Il. QTHER CONSTIT17TIONAL OFFICE~
PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPIC~
PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HF. kRD IM~[EDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF IT~'MS
3
March 18, 1997
All matters listed under thie item are considered to be routine
and action will be taken by one motion without separate
discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of
the Board, the= item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda
and coneidered separately.
A. COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT & L'~rVIRONMENTAL SERVIC~
[1) Approval of a Budget Amendment using Fund 111
reserves to pay impac= fees that were previously
authorized for reimbursement.
(2) Water facilities acceptance for Naples ~eritage
Clubhouse.
(3) Water facilities acceptance for Mystic Greens II.
(4) Water facilities acceptance for Naples Heritage
Maintenance Facility and Restroom.
(5} Recommendation to grant final accep%ance of the
roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for
the final plat of "Sou=hampton Unit One-.
B. PUBLIC WORF~
(1) Provide authorization to obligate funds for
professional services to perform the second year of
Post-construction monitoring requirements for the
Collier County Beach Restoration Project.
(2) Approve a change order for performance of additional
services under the Professional Services Agreement
with Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. for the
Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project.
(3) Approve renewal of me~%bership for 1997 in Fiorxda
Shore and Beach Preservation Association's "Beach
Watch" program for local government sponsors of beach
and inlet projects.
(4) Recommendation to reject Bid #97-2634 for the
purchase of a bulldozer for the Stormwater Management
Department.
March 18, 1997
(5) Approve the conveyance of water facilities to Florida
Cities Water Company and execution of Agreements
terminating interim water aez-vice Agreements.
(6) Award a contract for Bid No. 97-2642, Clam Pass
Maintenance Dredg'ing to Masters Group, ~nc. in the
amount of $77,411.00.
c. ~
{1) Recommendation that the Board of County Co,mmissioners
award the contract to renovate the Golden Gate
Community Center to W. j. Varian Construction
Company.
(2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
award the contract to make improvements at Immok&lee
Recreation/Aquatic Center to Vanderbilt Bay
Construction, Inc.
(3} ReCOmmendation that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt resolutions recinding a no-parking zone along
County Road 29 in the vicinity of Outdoor Resorts,
Chokoloskee Island, to allow off-road vehicle and
boat trailer parking and establishing a limited
no-parking zone on an adjacent right-of-way for
safety.
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida, renew its a v
appraisers and a~nraisa1 .~_ . ppis ~1 of
valuation sez-vice~r~h~.~'.u~*~m" _~or appraisal and
-~- ~n~ ~ounty may require from
time to time, pursuant to RFP-95-2338.
{2) Recommendation to award Bid No. 97-26¢1 for exterior
pressure cleaning.
(3) A Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for
certain residential accounts wherein the County has
received payment and said liens are satisfied in full
for the 1991 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal
Services Special Assessments.
(4) A Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for
certain residential accounts wherein the County has
received pay~nent and said liens are satisfied in full
for the 1993 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal
Services Special Assessments.
(S) A Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for
certain residential accounts wherein the County has
received payment and said liens are satisfied in full
for the 1992 Solid waste Collection and Disposal
Services Special Assessments. ·
(6] ReCommendation to approve a budget amendment to
appropriate the maintenance services revenues that
are in excess of their budget.
(7) Report to the Board of County Commissioners
concerning the sale and transfer of items associated
with the County's surplus auction of February 22,
1997.
5
March 18. 1997
BOARD OF COU'~I'T COI~SS~OI~R~
fl) Certificate cf Correction: NEED MOTION
the Ch~i~an to ~ign C~rttficate of Correction to the
tax roll~ ~ p~ented by tha Proper~y Appr~imer.~
Office. REC~E~
[2) Satiefaction of Lien: ~ED MOTIQN authorizing the
Chal~an ~o sign Satisfaction of Lien for Se~ice~ of
the ~lic ~fendmr for Came Nos. 96-8411-~.
94-1499-~, 96-3497-~, 96-10186-~, 96-9929-~,
96-212-~, 96-10059-~, 96-1615-CFA, 96-5393-~,
94-~880-CFB, 8S-3808-~, 90-3465-~ and
~C~E~ APPROVe,
(3) ~cellaneous I~.ms to File For Record With Action A
Directe~ ·
Q~R CONSTI~ION~
(1) Reco~enda=ion for Board to authorize =he
A~torney to commence a civil action againat Elba
Co.ora=ion and First Union National Bank of Florida.
focally Sou~heas~ Bank P.A., to draw on =he escrowed
funds for the re~ired improvements at E~assy Woods
Phase I and E~assy Woods Phase II.
$
March 18, 1997
A(~NDA CHAN~ES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETIN~
MARCH 18, 1997
ADD~ ITEM 10 (~) ~ FINAL REPORT OF THE CITIZENS' COUNTY
MANAGER SCREENING COM~ITTEE. (STAFF'S REQUEST).
1. COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL AND SOUTH REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT
PLA/T~ . (COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE) .
Mn
children have greater access to television today and watch more of the medium
on a daily basis; arwl
families are longing for better program.t depicting values, education and
learning of life skills for their children or grandchildren., and
programming that is al~propriate for an entire family to watch is much needed in
toda.y '$ society; and
I qlr£RF.n$,
we as a community applaud the efforts of organisatfon~ and businesses, xuch a~
Disney channel, which acknowledge that television vtewing can bt fun and
educational.
NOI~ THEREFORE, be it
fam~
recognize.
~Collier
ton as a provider of
Disney channel
AICP, CHAIRNt~
PROCLAMA 7'ION
The Volunteer Service Corp. is an integral part of the Collier County Public
Library system; and
during the months of December and January these concerntd cittzertx donated
over 3, 700 volunteer hours to our Public Library system; and
the total monetary value of this volunteer service exceeded $30,000. ~0; and
this volunteer service directly affects the taxpayers by r~atuctng the actual cost of
Library service; and
The VolunIeer Service Corp. now contains over 300 indivldual parttcipants; ana
the qualtty of £tbrary Service in Collier County would be reduced without thetr
presence and willingness to service.
NOW TttEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, that appreciation i~ extended to this
DONE AND
outstanding ~p between the public
and pr~,ate 'by both that an investme~
in our but in our present
as our commitment
to a ,lic ;, 1997,
be
CLERX~
CP, CHAI~
MAR 18
P.O.__ /
WHER_F_4S,
WH£REAS,
PROC£,4M4 TIO~
the Naples Woman's Club is cetebra~'ng sixty-five years of service to the Naples
community,, and
this Woman's Club has been instrumental in development and expansion of the
Collier County Public Library system; and
the Naples Woman '$ Club has established and promoted Youth Haven facilities
for dependenl children during these years; and
tn 1984 i;s members.funded and erected the Veteran '~ Memorial tn Cambier
Park; and
scholarships amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars have been
presented to local htgh school graduates over the~re many year$,, and
virtually hurMreds of philanthropic organization, r have benefited from both the
financial and volunteer arMstance of Naples Woman '$ Club members,, and
Naples Woman's
Naples area; the
the
acco~ these
cot its members for their
of Collier
dcm
DONE AND
D~qGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
A~3£ H.~.A ~Z TEM
NO. ,o ./'/·
HAR 18 lg~t7
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
M~rch 18, 1997
CLERK'S REPORT
Ana/ylJs of Changes to Re£erves for Contingencies
Genera/Fund (001) for FY 96/97
Community Development Fund (113) for 96/97
Facilities Construction Fund (301) for ~ 96/g7
AN, ALYI~ OF CHANGE8 TO GENERAL. FUND
I~EI£RVE FOR ¢ONTINQ£NCIE~
F~ lt~ mc,Ming d.~ ~¢ kCen~ 18,1~g7
FY' 1~47
RE~,ERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
I.A.
11-Z?'-~8 48
12-11..~8
64 To ;my ~ exp,me~ f~ ~ Chid Car~ ~
12-11~8
68 To r~3eir ~'~e ~ L.~ Chiae~
12.-31-e6
110
11g
~ re~Ne,~ with ~ m longer employed by EMS.
1-31-1~7
143 To ~ w'l~ Tax Deed App,~G;.-.i, for cleinque~
t~,l f~ 1 gg4 tax certf, clt~,
2-11 -g7
183 To fund gain ~hed~g award~ a~ ~g~:~<l by BCC 12.17..g6
1 ~7 To fum:l ~ rapai~ to Ihe Im~,=~/~e J~, Naple~ J~il
$10,000 eech: (No.: 29. 17. 66, 69. 51,181,162.)
$
$
4,6'ZS.gO0
5,~31,919
(18.50000)
(~ 4,475.00)
41,300.00
(42,770.00)
(35,50OO0)
(12,50000)
(36,180)
.....
HAR 1 ~ 1997
ANALY'~ OF CHAHG~$ TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (113)
P.,~.~ RVE FOR
Fo~ ~ mean9 of M~ch 18, 1997
FY t~4-~7
FOR
~m<~.~nm) o,' W~c~m mm mxpkW~d
1-22-97
112
EX~LANAT}ON OF REDUCTIONS
Explanation
Fun(~ ~ovk:led by mxcm cmn'y forward
$ 4~5.200
Total Redu~on~
AI~,LYI~ OF CHANGES TO FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION FUND (301)
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES
F~e mee'~v3 ~ of M~rcfl lB, 1997
2-11-g7
2-24-97
3-5-97
B.A.
145
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS
Exp~m:m
~da~on can')' forward i~ needed for ongoing proJectl
for 1997.
Fund. n~t nee~d f~. L.~-~g R~'of~, returned
Funde needed to cover ~he co~! of professorial
~nd~caping for Em 41.
$ 294,400.00
533,733.00
(=2,0O0)
Amendm®ntl ,,,mounting to ~ than
$10,000 each: (No.: 25)
(2.201)
Tot~ reductior~
$ 239.3.33
o.~
MAR 1 1997
N~t05-~7 23:57
- · g42 403 77g0
~.02
Presented by the Naples Junior Chamber, Inc. (Niple$ JC's)
P.O. Box 7783
Nal~e~. Fk~l. 34101
(941) 4d3-3748
FAX 403-779O
March 5, 1997
Mike McNees
Interim County Manager
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34104
This is a request to be placed on the Cc!lier County Commission
agenda for Tuesday, March 18, 1997 under the "Public Petition"
heading.
The Naples Junior Chamber, Inc. wishes the Collier County Board
Of Corur, issioners to be the title sponsor of the upcoming JULY 4TH
FESTIVAL to be held Friday, July 4, 1997 at Sugden Regional Park.
The Collier County Parks & Recreation Department would be the
supervising entity for the county. I have had several meetings
with Skid Camp and his staff. They are ezcited and most '
interested in assisting with this event.
For more information please contact me at the above phone
nu~T~ers.
~-..ecutive Director
AGENDA ITEM
I~:.~.. ~
3620 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, FL 34103-3724
CHAMBER/EDC
COALITION EC~ D6VELOPt~NI'
Of COOLER
FOR GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
(941) 262-6376 FAX (941) 262-8374
Mr. Michael A. McNees
Interim County Manager
330i Tamiarrti Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
INFO:
FIL[:
STAFF FILl:
March 11, 1997
HAND DELIVERED
Re: Request for Public Petition - Post Disaster Re-Entry Identification Program
Dear Mr. McNees:
The Disaster Recovery Committee of the Chamber/EDC Coalition for Government and
Community Affairs came before the Board &County Commissioners on June 18, 1996. Ms. Klm
Anderson, representing the committee, presented a plan for a Post-Disaster Re-Entry
Identification Program. Having received the approval of the Commission, as well as the City
Council, the committee moved forward with the program.
On behalf of the committee, I would like to request that Mr. Frank Balogh, the Committee Vice
Chair, be placed on the agenda for the March 18, 1997 Board of County Commission, under
Public Petitions, to present the Commissioners with the completed program.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this request I
can be reached at 262-6376.
cc: Capt. Tom Storrar
Chief Kevin Rambosk
Mr. Ken Pineau
Disaster Recovery Committee Members
Sincerely,
Ellie Krier
Chamber Coalition Manager
HAR 1 8 I997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPlV[ENT AND ENVIRONME~AL SERVICES
DIVISION STAFF PRESENTING THE 1996 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
OBJECTIVE: To present the Board of County Commissioners with an
a~mual update of activities of the Development Services Advisory Committee.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Development Services Advisory Con~.mittee (DSAC) was
formally acknowledged as an Advisory Board to the Board of Commissioners in 1993 by
Ordinance 93-76. The stated mission of the DSAC is to assist in the enhancement of
operational efficiency and budgetary accountability within the Community Development
and Environmental Services DMsion and to provide a link between the Division,
development industry and citizens of Collier County.
Chairman for 1996 was Tom Peek, PE., and Herbert R Savage, AIA, served as the
Vice-Chairman Newly elected Chair and Vice-Chair for 1997 are Clifford Barksdale, P.E.
and R. Bruce Anderson, respectively. The DSAC holds publicly noticed meetings the first
Wednesday of each month at the Development Services Center.
The DSAC is organized into three standing subcommittees to oversee the varying
responsibilities of the full Committee These sub-committees are: Land Development
Regulation, Chair, Cliff Barksdale, Utility Codes, Co-Chairs, Gary Hayes and Joyceanna
"J..A." Rautio; and Construction Codes, Chair, Dino Longo. These sub-committees also
meet monthly and held a combined total of 38 meetings during 1996, not including the
special meetings held by the Land Development Regulation Sub-committee during the
development of the Commercial Building Architectural and Design Guidelines or special
committee meetings relative to development of the revised Utility Standards Ordinance.
All Committee and Sub-committee meetings are publicly noticed.
The DSAC had a very active and involved year, highlighted by the following
accomplishment s:
MAR 1 8 1997
· Endorsed of single-family lot drainage plans in conjunction with building permits
· Supported elimination of privatized building inspections
· Provided advisement in discussions on fire flow policy and fire department interlocal
agreement.
· Reviewed habitat protection ordinance/standards and results of developer incentive
survey for habitat protection.
· Approved structural building and hurricane code amendments
· Affirmed revised commercial vehicle ordinance
· Continued to review and comment on the amendments to the Utility Standards
Ordinance.
· Provided oversight of the budget development for the Community Development and
Environmental Services Division annual budget.
· Continued to provide input in the development of the Community Development
integrated computer network.
· Endorsed enhanced landscaping and building signage requirements for commercial
sites.
· Provided technical expertise in the development of the Commercial Building
Architectural and Design Guidelines.
Gross'th Managemen! Impact: AJI actions of the Development Services Advisory
Committee are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
Fiscal Impact: This Advisory Committee has no operating budget and receives staff
support via the Community Development and Environmental .Services Division
Administrator.
Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners accept the 1996 annual
report of the Development Services Advisory Committee.
Prepared By:
Donald W, ,,sJ--nold, AICP
Planning Services Department Director
Date
.,
.,.1.P, " ',z 7
I AR 1 8 !
Reviewed By:
Tom Peek, P.E.
Immediate Past Chairman of DSAC
Date
Chairman, DSAC
/
Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator
Community Developmem & Environmental Services Division
Date
Date
~I,~R 18 lgg?
STAFF REVIEW AND RECC~4ENDATIONS RELATIV~ TO ORDINJ%NC£ 90-7,
AI2~O ~ ~ T~ ~S~D ~, ~ICH, ~CO~ING ~ T~ ~I~D
~ STA~S ~RT ~IT~D BY T~ ~R~ ~R/~NT, ~ NOT
~N~D ~S~CTI~, ~ DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF ~
~I~R C~ ~ DE~~NT CODE, ~S~TING IN SEVE~
~ ~NSIDER.
OBJ]:CT/V~: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff's
findings and recommendations regarding the above referenced PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on January 23,
1990. Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code
requires that the project developer submit an annual report on
the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary
of the PUD approval by the Board. of County Commissioners. The
singular purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not the
project has commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria
set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs approved prior to
the effective date of adoption of the Land Development Code, the
five year approval period commenced on the adoption date, October
30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set forth in Section
2.7.3.4. are applicable as of October 30, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which
was approved prior to October 30, 1991 and which has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4. Staff has
utilized the required PUD status {monitoring) report,
supplemented by field observation and review of in house records
to verify the current status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided
in Section 2.7.3.4 (I) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2.7.3.4.
Time limits for approved PUD master plans. In the event
that a PUD master plan is given approval, and the
landowner(s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a
development order for all infrastructure improvements
to include utilities, roads and similar improvements
required by the approved PUD master plan or other
development orders for at least 15 percent of the gross
land area of the PUD site every five years of the date
of approval by t~he Board of County Commissioners; and
1 8 ,'997 '
o
Fail to receive final local davelo~ent orders for at
least 15 ~ercent of the total number of approved
dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case of PUDs
consisting of nonresidential uses, 30 p~rcent of the
to~al approved gross leasable floor area within the PUD
every six years of the date of approval by the Board of
County Commissioners.
The project developer shall sul~it to the Planning
Services Director a status report on the' progress of
develo~x~ent annually cc=~encing on the fifth
anniversary date of the PUD approval by the ~oard of
County Commissioners. The singular purpose of the
report will be to evaluate whether or not the project
has commenced in earnest in accordance with the
criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has commenced in earnest, then the land
shall retain its existing PUD approval and shall not be
subject to additional review and consideration of new
development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has not commenced in earnest, then upon
review and consideration of the report provided by tho
owner and any supplemental information that may be
provided, the Board of County Commissioners shall elect
one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period
of two years; at the end of which time, the owner will
again submit to the procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to sufl~it an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be
consistant with the Growth Management .Plan. The
existing PUD shall remain in effect until subsequent
action by the board of the submitted amendment of the
PUD.
If the owner fails to sul~mit an amended PUD within six
months of Board action to require such an amended
submittal, then the Board may initiate proceedings to
rezone the unimproved portions of the original PUD to
an appropriate zoning classification cons ..... ~ v~ ~h
-2-
MAR 1 8 ]997
the ~ture Land Uae El~a~nt of the Growth ~fana~ment
Plan.
Zn the case of developments of regional impact, time
limit restrictions shall bo ~rseded by the phasing
plan and/or tim~ limits contained within the
a~plication for development approFal and approved as
~art of a develo~aent order in conformance with F.$. ]
380.06.
~lrnopsis of Approv~<i Land Uses:
This PUD was approved for a range of commercial uses similar to
the C-3 zoning district for a maximum of 20,000 square feet of
retail on tract I (1.35 acres), plus 90,000 square feet of non-
retail uses such as warehousing, offices and similar uses, or 160
motel rooms (a density of 26 units per acre) on tract II (6
acres). This PUD also contains a 2.2 acres of preserve area
divided between tracts I and II, This PUD contains 8.23 acres.
Consistency with Comx~rehensive Growth Management Plan:
The subject PUD is designated an Activity Center on the Future
Land Use Element of the GMP. Based on staff review of the
approved land uses, the PUD has been determined to be consistent
with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The PUD has also
been found to'be consistent with the following GMP Elements FLUE;
Traffic Circulation Element; Open Space/Natural Resource Element.
Consistency. with the Collier County Land Develo~ment Code :
The PUD has been distributed to the appropriate Jurisdiction
review entities specifically for review of the PUD for
consistency with current land development regulations. Based on
that review, the following inconsistencies have been identified:
Transportation: (Traffic impacts, access management, etc.)
This PUD will be required to adhere to the provisions of the LDC,
including the Access management Plan.
Landscape: {Buffers/Green Space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
L~.
Environmental: (Protected species, green/open space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC. -
'3--
IlAR 1 8 1 97
·
~nginm~ring/Site Dmvmlo~nt: (Sewer/water, drainage issues)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Planning: ( Architectural Standards)
This PUD pre-dates the Architectural Standards gf the LDC;
however, the applicant has agreed to comply with the
Architectural Standards of the LDC, at the time of development.
FISCAL IMPACT: A two year extension of this PUD Ordinance will
have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
BTA. FF RECO[~4ENDATION:
Based on a comprehensive review of this PUD document,
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant a two
year extension of this PUD.
PREPARED BY:
CHARRAM BADAMTCHIAN, Ph.D., AICP
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
RO~RT J. MULHERE, AICP
CURRENT PLARNING MANAGER
DATE
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP
PLARNI~G SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
CC~MUNITY DEVELOi~ENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISI~ iN
-4-
MAR 1 8 1997
,----.---
10
'*~ 11
14
15
· "-:l 24
30
31
39
41
43
44
R£SOLUTION 97-
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
CCI~MISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, P'JRSU~.~T TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOFM~NT CODE AFFECTING ORDINA2/CE
90-7 K~O~ A~ CRESTWOOD PUD,
EXTENDING Th'E CL~NT PUD A~PROVA/, TO
)4ARCH 18, 1999; ]~WD PROVIDING A/~
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHERe, the Crestwood PUD, Ordinanca 90-7 adopted on
January 23, 1990, is subject to the provisions of Section
2.7.3.4., of the Land Develop:ent Code (LDC), Time Limits for
Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective
Master Plans; and
WHER/.AS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
provisions of the Collier Co'~%ty Growth Manage~ant Plan; and
WHEREAS, the applicant kas acknowledged that the subject PUD
shall com~ly with the AJchltez~ural Standards, as defined in
Section 2.8 of the Land Devei:pment Code (LDC].
WHEREAS, the Board of Czunty Commissioners has reviewed the
PUD and has detex-r...ined to ax:~nd the current PUD Zoning for two
years, until March 18, 1999; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RS~LVED, by the Board of Zoning
Appeals of Collier County, Ficrida that:
This
approval.
The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
as if fully set for:h herein.
This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
Pursuant to said ae:tion of the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to March 18, 1999;
at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4.
Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
BE IT FURTHER RESOL%~D that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
which the extension is grante~.
This Resolution adopte~ after motion, second and majority
vote.
Done this
day of , 1997.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
D~IGHT E. BROCK, CLEkK
TIMOTHY L. ~tA}~COCK, CliAI~;
APPROVED A~ TO FORM k~D LEG$C SUFFICIENCY:
MARJq~IE M. STUDENT
A~SISTANT COUNTY ATTO?.N~y
f/Crestwood PUD/
-2-
liAR 1 8 1997
ORDINANCE 90- 7
A~ ORDINANCE AMTNDIHG ORDINANCE
82-2 THE CO~RZHENSiVZ ZONING ~G~TiONS
FOR ~Z WIHCO~O~TED ~ OF"COLLI~
CO~y, FLORIDA BY ~ENDIN~ ~E OFFICI~
ZONING AT~S ~P ~ER 48~26-9 BY
C~;GI::G TH~ ZONING C~SSIFiCATION OF
MEREIN DESCRIBED Re~ ~ROP~TY FROM A-2
TO "Pb~" P~N~D ~;IT D~ELOPMENT FOR
APPROXI:~TEL~ 5.5 ACRES OF R~STA~T,
RETAIL OR OFFlCE SPACE IN ADDITION TO 2.7
ACRES OF RI~HT-OF-WAY, OPEN ~PACE ~D..
W~;D ~, TO BE ~O~ AS'
PROPERTY LOCATED AT ~Z SOPHIST CO~
OF I~O~EE ROAD (CR
INTERChanGE QU~T, CONSISTINU pF 8.23~
ACRES, LOCATED IN ~!~ION 30, TO,SHIP
SOUTH, ~:GE 26 ~ST, COLLI~ CO~;TY,
FLORIDA; ~D BY PROVIDING ~ EFFECTIVE
DATE.
W~EREAS, Robert L. Duane of Hole, Montes and
Asseciates, re~resenting Frederick R. Pauly, Trustee,
petitioned the Bcard of County Commissioners to change
the zoning classification of the herein described real
property;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAIHED by the Board of
County Com.uissicners of Collier County, Florida:
SECTION ONE:
The Zoning Classification of the herein described
real property located in Section 30, Township 48 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from
"A-2" to "PUD" PlannWd Unit Development in accordance
with the PUD doc'anent attached hereto as Exhibit "A"
which is incorporated herein and by reference made part
he~eof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map"Nu=~ber 48-26-9, as
described in Ordinance Humber 82-2, i$ hereby amended
accordingly.
I
This Ordinancs shell become effective upon receipt
of notics froa the Secretary of State that this
DATe.: January 23, 1990 BOM~D OF COUFTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CO~/NTY, F~RIDA
R-~9-20 PUD ORDiN~;CE
nb/2007
· !
CRZSTWOOD
UNIT D~-VZLOPM~NT
FILE NO.
Prepared By
Hole, Montes & As$o¢iates,.Inc.
715 loth Street South
Naples, Florida 33940
January 9, 1989
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE
SECTION I
STATEMiNT OF ¢O::PLIA~NCE .............. · ....... '..: .... 1
SECTION II ' .'.
PROPERTY OW~NERSHIP, LI. GAL D~_SCRIPTION,'SHORT '.
TITLE AND STATE."-:;T OF 5,'NiFIE0 CONTROL..' ......... '.. 2-3
SECTION III
STATE,~fENT OF I.NTE:~? A~rD RRCJ---CT DESCRiPTiON ........ 4-5
SECTION IV
GENERAL DE%~LOP.~.'E:~T R.~GULATiON$ .................... 6-10
SECTiO:; V
E:U*I RON'MENTAL STA2~DARDS ............................ 11-13
SECTION VI
TRANSPORTATION PSQU I P~}~NT S ........................ 14
SECTION VII
~NGINEERING A.~'D UTILITIES F~.QUIR~.M~:~T$. '" 15-17
SECTION. VIII
WATBR F. A2~AG_.-,~:_VNT R~QUIP. F. MT_NTS ......................
EXHIBIT A:
EXHIBIT B:
LIST OF EX'H. IBIT$
CONC£~AL PUD MASTER PLAN
WAFER
.f
! I
-~-CTION I
STATFI{ZNT OF COMPLIA~C£
The development of this project will* be in compliance ~ith the
planning goals and objectives of Collier County ss Sst forth in the
Growth Management Plan. This compliance.includes:
1. The subject property is located in In'aria identified as an
Activity Center in the Cro',~h Managenent Plah for Collier
County.
2. Activity Centers are the preferred 'locatio~s for the
concentration of co.~-.ercial and mixa~ use development
activities such as this project.
3. The subject tract is l¢cated on the southeast corner of the
I~okalea Roa~ and 2-75 ln~er~ection. This strategic
locations allcws the site superior access for the placenent
of commercial activities.
4. The project shall be in compliance ~lth all applicable County
regulations including the ~row~h Management Plan.
5. The project ~i!! ~e served by a complete range of services and
utilities aa approved by the County.
6. The project is cc:;atibla ~ith adjacent land uses"throu~h t~he
internal arrangezent of structures, the placement of land use
buffers, and the proposed davelopmen~ standards cone&lead
herein.
The Planned Unit Development includes open spaces and natural
features ~hich a ·
r preserved from future development in order
to enhance their natural functions and to serve as proJec~
amenities.
On this site, %he proJec% cosines' land uses, including
retail, and office uses, vi%h extensive open spaces and buffer
zonem to satisfy the ~ldalines ad~ra~sed in the ~ro~h
Eanagement Plan pertaining ~o land uses in planned unit
developments ~i:hin Activity Center~.
SECTION II,
\
PROPERTY O'.~.;~RSHIp, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SHORT TITL.T.
Ak;D STATEMENT OF UNIFiED CONTROL
2.1 The subject pro?e~y is currently o'~ned by: ~.
Fredrick R. Pauly, Trustee -'
2.2 The subject prc~erty is described ss f~l.lo~s:
L'--GAL D_~SCRIPTIoN
CR~ST,'OOD PUD
The West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Nor~,heast
1/4 of Section 36, Township 48 South, Range 2S East, Collier
County, Florida.
Less and except the Nc.~h 100 feet thereof previously conveyed to
the State of Florida, dated 26, September 1965 and recorded in D.B.
43, Page 243, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
Less and ,xc.pt prc~.-ty condemned by the S=.t. of Florida ~
amended order of taking of the T~elfth Judicial ¢ircui= Court.%
Civil Action No. 74-197-CA-01-JTR. ~
Containing 8.23 acres, =ore or less.
PREPARZD BY:
Advanced Surveying Inc.
9282 vanderbilt Drive
N&p!es, Florida 33963
2.3 f~igET_TJ~Ii&
This ordinance shall be kno'~n and cited as the "Crest~ood Planned
Unit Development Ordinance".
SECTION III . --
STATL,V~:;T OF INTiNT A/~D PROJECT DESCRIPTION
It is ~he ~e'/eloper,s in:ant to es~ablish · ~lanned Unit
to set forth flexible 7Uidelinel for the fu~ure development
cf the project that meet accepted planning principles and
practices end to implemen: the ~ro~h~nagemeft.Plan.
3.2
The location of land uses are sho-~n on the Concep:ual PUD
MeS~er Plan. Chan~es and variations in building location and
the mix cf lend uses shall be permitted via Site Develop:en~
Plan approval in accordance with Section 10.5 of the
Ordinance. Changes and varla~ion In buildin~ trac:s may be
pekin:ed during Site Development Plan approval if, at ~he
discretion of the County Manager, or his designee, such
changes and variations are in confo:ance with ~e substantive
and procedural requirements of the Subdivision ReT~la:ions.
3.3 ~'ITE CLE~.RI~:O ~D
Clearing, ~r~d!nq, earthwork, and site drainage w6rk shall
parroted in accordance with applicable Collier Ccun:y Ccde~
and Ordinances and ~e standards and co:i~ments of
doc~ent.
3.4 EASE~NTS F0~ UTILITIE~
Easements, where re~ired, shall be provided for water
management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be
needed.
Ail necessary easements, dedications'or other
shall be sranted %o insure the continued operation and
main%enance of all me,ices and utilities. This will ~e
substantial cczpli~nce vi~h applicable re~lations In effect
at the ti~e a~provals are ra~eated.
3.5 ~QN$£RVATI0~; KREA
The Conservation Area will bm dedicated for conservation and
for uae of :he Conserve:ion Areas shall stipulate:
The Conservation Area ~a hereby declared common area, and
ahall be the perpetual responaibility cf the aasociation and
may An no way be altered from ira natural Irate. Activi:ies
prohibited within the Conservation Area include, but'are not
limited to the followin~: conatruc~l~n or placi~ of build!riga
on or above the ~round; du~pin~ ~r placinq soil or o~her
aubetancea auch aa trash; removal or' deatrucficn of treea,
ahru~a, or other veqe:a~ion with the 'exception of ex::ic
plante as defined in the County Code; ewcavaticn,
or removal of aoil material; and any other
detrimental to dr&ina~e, flood control, ~ater c:naarvatlon,
erosion control, or fiah and ~il~lifa habitat conae.--va:lcn or
preaerv&ticn. U~e~ pe.-mi%~ad in the conaervation area include
boardwalks, picnic are~ and other uaes compatih!e ~ith the
Conservation Are~.
4.1
4.2
4.3
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEV~LOPMINT R~U~TIONS
The purpose of this'section is to delineate the developnent
regulations that accompany the Conceptual ~$D Master Plan.
Where dave!o~r~ent standards are not specifically provld~d for
in this dccuzent the applicable stand~rda of the Collier
County Zoning Ordinance shall apply.
No building or structure, or part thersof, shall he erected,
altered or used, or land used, in ~hole or part, for
than the following:
A. ~rinc!o~! Ccrm~rcial Uses
1. Anti~ae shops; appliance stores; art studios;
· . supply shops; automobile parts stores; aut:nobile
service stations with repairs (in accordance with
the standards of Section 9.8 of. the Zoning
Ordinance).
2. ~akery shops; bait and tackle shops: banks o.~e
financial institutions; barber and beauty ah
bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services;
blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business
~achtne services.
3. CaJpet and floor covering sales - which may include
storage and installation; churches and other places
cf ~orship (in accordance with the sZandards of
Section 8.11 of the Zonin~ Ordinance): clothing
stores; cocktail lounges (in accordance vith the
standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance);
cor:ercial recreation uses - indoor; ¢on.neroial
schools; confac=ionary and candy stores.
4. Delicatessens; dm~artment stores; ~rug stores: dry
cleaning shops; dry good stores; and drapery shops.
5. Electrical supply stores;' equipment rentals
including lawn mowers and power saws, which may
include their repair and sale.
6 -
6. Fish market - retail only; florist shops; fraternal
and social clubs (in accordance with the standards
of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance); funeral
hones; furniture stores; furrier shops.
7. Garden supply stores - outside display in side and
rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror~sales -
including storage and insta'llation.: gou.~e, shops.
8. Hardware Stores; hat cleaning and bI~cktng; health
focd stores: homes for th% aged; hospitals and
hospices.
9. Ice cream store~.
10. Je'welry stores.
11. Laundries - self service only; leather gocds:
legizimate theatres; 1iq-dot stores; locksmiths.
12. Marinas: markets - food: markets - meat; medical
offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and
hotels; motion picture theatres; museums; music
stcres; Dinor automobile repair work.
13. Ne~ car dealerships - outsid~ displsy per~. !teed;
nets stores; night clubs (in accordance with the
standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance).
14. Office - general; office supply stores. -.
15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply
shcps; photographic eq~ipnan~ stores; pottery
stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services
shops; private clubs (in accordance with the
standards cf Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance);
professional offices.
16. Radio and television sales and services; radio
staticn (offices and studios), and auxililry
transmitters and receiving equipment, but not
principal transmission tower; research and ~esign
labs; rest homes; restaurants - including drive-in
or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the
standards of Sec=ton 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance).
17. Sewage treatment facility; shoe repair; shoe stores:
shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery
stores: supermarkets and'sanatoriums.
18. T&ilor shops: ~&×idermists; tile sales - cerauic
tile; tobacco shops: ~toy shops: tropical fish
stores.
20. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles only;
veterinarian offices and .clinicq - no outside
kennels.
21. Watch end precision lnstrumpnt repai~ shops.
22. Warehousing, wholesaling, sto~age and ~istri~ution
facili=ies, including comparable uses.
23. Any other cc~merci&l use or professional se.vice
which Is comparable in nature vith the foregoing
uses and which the County Manager, or his ~esig~ee,
da%e:-m, ines to be comparable to and compatible with
the foregoing uses.
Acceoso:-v Uses
1. Accessory uses and structures, customary ~n
ccr--.ercial centers and for transient lodging
facilities including tenpora~/ water .an~ sewage
facilities, should they be required. ~-
~onserv~tion Area Uses ~
Uses detern, ine~ to be consistent with the intent of
the Ccnservation Area such as boardwalks, nature
trails an& picnic areas.
4.4 L~-';D USE INTENSITY ~-~D PROJECT PHASING
Tract
Tract II
Retail, Office, or
Commercial
Warehousin~, storage,
other comparable non-retail
lan~ uses
Right-of-Way . ..~
APPROX.
1.35
6.0
.~5
4.5
There are t~o tracts of land placed for develo~nent within
thin PUD, Tracts ! and II. The full range of con~erclal usaa
Will be permitted on Tract I. Tract II will be linited to
motel Uses, offices uses, warehouse and distribution
facilities including ocher land uses which are non-re,ail in
character.
On the co~ercial Tract I, a maximum 'of 20,000 s~uare fee=
retail ia to be allowed in accordance with the provisions se~
forth in Section IV, Subsection 4.3 of the'.F~D document.
Tract II will allow a maximum of ~0,000 aqu&r% feet of non-
retail use or 160 motel units, based on a
per acre. ..
Property ia proJec=ed to be develo~e~ to a build ou= over a
ten year period.
1. Yron% Yard - Fifty (50) feet.
2. Side yard - ~¢enty-five (25) feet fro: external
property boundaries, ten (10) feet at the Tract X/
Tract II boundary.
3. A t~e~y (20) feet setback frcn the'edge of the
Conse~¢a=icn Area ia required.
4. Rear yard setback - Fifty (SO) feet from
prope~y boundarie~.
5. No t~'o principal structures may be closer together
than cna-half the sum of the building heights.
Lot Size Re-'Uire~erht
1. Mininun lot ~id=h - One hundred (100) feet.
2. Min!nun lc= size - Ten thousand (10 000) square
fee~. ,
kttnimum Floor Ar~
1.
Mo~el Units: Four hundred (400) a~uars feet and not
to exceed five hundred ($00) aqyare feet.
All ocher cor~ercial uses: Minimum one thousand
(1,000) square feet. '.,
f
/
As re~-uired by the Collier County Zoning Ordinance in
Iffec~ a~ the ti~e ~ermits are requested.
Maximum ~eich~
1. Sixty f/va (65) feet for'motel ueee~.
2. Fifty (50) flat for commercial UlII.~'
A fifty (50) feet setback will bm provided from adjoining
proper:}' line~. The per/meter of the plant will be
ecreened in accordance with Ordinance 8.3?.
~enty five (25) foot buffer, utilizing axiating
vegetation, with 10' landscaped buffer within the
50' eetback buffer, to the rear of the project in
accordance with the atand&rd~ of Section $.3? of the
Zcnlng Ordinance.
Ae required by the Collier County Zoning Or{inane,
in affect at the time pix-mits ire requested.
Should residential uses occur on the tract to-t
east of this parcel prior to the development of t~la
parcel, a ten (10) foot landecape buffer shall be
in,tailed along the eastern property line.
H. $iona~9
As reTaired by the Collier County Sign Ordinance in
effect at the time pe.'-mit~ are requls%ed.
10
5.1
SZCTZO~ V
E WV Z R 0 :' ,', .vi. '- NT~ L ST~DA_RDS
The purpose of this Section is to sst forth ~a stipulations
established by the Enviror~ental Advisory Council·
A. Petit/omar shall ~e subject tO Ordinance 7~-21 (or the
tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the
time cf pern. itting], re~irtng the acguisition cf a tree
removal per~!t prior to any land clearing. A site
clearing plan shall he submitted to the Environnental
Resources Management for their review and subject
approval prior to any york on the site. This plan may
be submitted in phases to coincide with the development
schedule. The ~ite clearin~ plan shall clearly depict
hov the final site layout incorporates retaine~ native
vegetation to the ~axi~u~ extent possible and h~ roads,
buildings, lakes, par~ing lots, and other facilities have
been oriented to accommodate this goal.
Native species shall be utilized, a~ descr~'Med ~elov, in
the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all
landscapin~ on the development shall be submitted to the
County Landscape Architect and to a County Envircnme~&l
Specialist for their review and shall be subject to ~heir
approval. The landscape design shall incorporate a
mini~u~ of S0% native plants, by number, Ancludin~ trees,
shrubs, and ground cover. At least ~0% of the trees,
o~ the shrubs, and ~0% of the groundcover shall be native
species. At the direction of the County Landscape
Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher
percentage o~ tree~ or shrubs' can o~fmet a~ egual
percentage of groun~cover. ~or example, the use of ?0%
native trees could allow the uae o~ only S0% native
groundoovar. This plan shall depict the incorporation
o~ native species and their six with other species,.
any. The goal of site landscapin~ shall be the re
creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to past
activities.
Co
All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall
be removed during each phase of construction from
development areas, open space areas, and presez-~a areas.
Following site development~ a maintenance program shall
be implemented to prevent ~einvasion of the site by such
11
exotic species. This plan, whl?h will describe control
techni~ues and inspection intervals, shall be filed with
and subject to approval by ~he Environmental Resources
Management and the Community Development Sar-vices
Division.
D. If, during the course of sfte clearing, excavation, or
other construction activities, an archaeological or
historical site, artifact, or other indicator is
discovered, all development at 'that loc. ation shall be
immediately stopped and the Environmeptal Resources
Management notified. Development will be'suspended for
a sufficient length of time to enable the.Environmental
Resources Management or a designated consultant to assess
the find and date.--1, ina the proper course of action in
regard to its salvageability. The Environnen=a!
Resources Management will res=end to an'; such
notification in a timely and efficient manner ~o as to
provide only a minimal interruption to any const.-ucticn
activities.
E. A conservation area comprising 2.2 acres of wetlands is
set aside on the Conceptual PUD Master Plan in vhich no
development is permitted to take place unless determined
to be consistent with the natural function of this area.
Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance Ko. 75-21 es
amended by Ordinance 89-58 (prese~,atiQn of native
habitat). 'o
G. Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance ;;o. 82-2
amended by Ordinance 89-57 (use of native species'.
landscaping).
H. Pe%itloner shall be subject to Ordinance 82-37 as amended
by Ordinance 89-53 (removal of exotic species).
I. Petitioner shall be subject to Collier County
Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.3 (discovery of an
archaeolocical or historical site, artifact or other
indicator'of prese~'-vation).
J. Petitioner shall obtain and submit documentation of all
necessary local, state and federal permits.
K. In the event active protected speciee foraging habitat,
nests or burrows are encountered during development
activities, the Collier County .Planning Services
Environmental Review Staff shall be notified i~nediately
and project designs may be adjusted, if warranted.
(Collier County Cozprehensive"Plan policy 6.3.4)
12
L. Protected plant species (but~srfly orchid and wild pine)
and those sighted during deve%opnent activities shall be
protected from injury or rslocated on site, preferably
to preserve or landsoape arsas. The existing locations
es wall as the transplanting locations, if warranted,
shall be identified on tbs site plan.
M. The conservation area shall be delineate~ by a signed and
sealed professional survey on the site plan.
N. A natural vegetation buffer sha.ll ha r~.q~lred around
protected wetlands at least ten (1'0) feet wide.
O. Control structure elevations in protected, 'created or
restored ~e%!ands shall be established to main=mis or
improve ede~4a:e hydroperiods. The control structure
elevation shall be designed to metz the requirements of
South Florida Water Managemen~ District and Collier
County engineerin~ and Water Management Department.
P. Quantitative criteria for miti~ation shall be based on
the results of final field determinations made by the
South Florida Water Management District end Collier
County Environmental Staff at the time of site
'- development plan approval. Compensation proposals shall
provide reasonable assurance that resource impacts will
be offset. ..
1. Mitigation plans proposed in wetlands to be
press.--red, restorsd, enha~cmd shall include &
description of area (location and six.e), vegetation
proposed to be-planted, source of vegetation
(transplantation 'from impacted areas preferred),
hydrologic 'regime, exotic vegetation removal,
monitoring and maintenance plan.
2. Mitigation proposed in upland areas shall emphasize
establishment of habitat value. Ye~atation retained
and supplemented shall focus on wildlife value and
estab!is.h~ent of nativ~ vegetative "con~unities".
3. Lake mitigation in the lake designated on conceptual
site plan shall include littoral zone plantings of
native, aquatic 'vegetation.
Q. Petition shall be subject to all Collier County
Ordinances in effect at co~encement of construction.
TRAa;$ PORTATION VI
TRAa;$PORTATION REQUI~.~NT$
I. Provide left and right turn lanes on Inmokalee Road at the
project entrance.
2. Provide arterial level stre&t lighting ah the project
entrance. .o.
3. Provide a fair share contribution to~rd the c~pita! cost cf
hy th, ccur. l.~. Tea signal shall be o~ned, o~era=ed and
maintaine~~:~..'Co!lier C:unty.
4. All traffic castro! devices used shall conform ~ith the
~/l Unifc.-r. Traffic Cor.=ro! Device~ as required by
316.0747, F!crida Statutes.
5. These in~rcTenents are considered "site related" as defined
in Ordinance ~5-55 and shall not'be applied as credits toward
any lnDact fe,s re.cuired by that ordinance. All improvements
except signalization shall be in place before any certificates
'of occupancy are issued.
6. Primary access to Ir~okalpe Road shall be via'the exes%lng
Frontage Road. - Ail frontage roads are subject'to Flori~
Department of Trans~o~ation road classification in
Collier County maintains ~he frontage road unless ~-~4~
(Imc. okalee Ro~d) becomes functionally classified as a
road.
7. Should the project gain access to a pe~itted "r. aJor access"
to the east via a frontage road, ~ht developer ~hall
a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic
· ignal at that access Then deemed warranted by the County.
Additionally, the Florida Department' of Transportation and
Collier Count}' rese~e the right to modify and/or close the
existing neOian opening for safety and/or capacity needs.
8. The ro=d i~,pact fee ~hall be in accordance ~i=h the fee
schedule s~= forth in Ordinance 85-55, or as may be amended,
and shall be paid at the time building p,~its are issued
unless otherwise approved by the Board of County
Co~issioners.
9. All re.ired access improvements shall bm in place b~fore any
certificates of occupancy are issued, and mhall not be subject
'to impact fee cr~di6s.
14
7.1
SECTION VI~\.
ENGiNESRING AKD UTILITIES P. EQUI;~EMIMTS
The purpose of this Section is to set fort,.the utilities
requirements ~hich must be accommodated b~ the project
developer. .
1. Water distrikuticn, sewage col!ecticn and
transmission and interim ~ater and/or se~ace
treatment facilities to sez-~e the project are to ~e
designed, cons=ruc=ed, conveyed, oTned and
:elm=aimed in accordance ~ith Collier County
O.-_nance No. 88-76, as amended, and other
a~iica~le Ccun:y ~les and regulations.
2. All customer~ connecting ~o the ~ater distribution
and ~e~'age collection facilities to he const~cted
~ill ke cu~tomer~ of the County and ~ill ba billed
by the County in accordanca with the County,s
est~k!ished rates. ..
Shcu!d the County not be in a position ~c provide
~aler and/or se~ar ~e~ica to the project, the w~er
and/or seuer customers shall be customer~ of tSe
interim utility established ~o se~e the project
until the County,s off-site water and/or se~er
faci!itiea ara available %o se~e the project.
3. I% i~ anticipated that the County Utilities Division
con~unp=ive demand and/or receive and treat the
· a~ga generated by ~hia project. Should the County
sy~:en no% be in a position ~o ~upply potable water
to =ha project and/or receive the project's
wa~tawa=er at the time development commences, the
Developer, at hi~ *~en~e will in,tall and operate
in=erin wa=er '~upply and on-site treatment
facilities and/or in%arim on-~ite ~e~age treatment
disposal facilitia~ ads,ate to mee~ all
reTairazen=s of the appropriate re~lato~agencies.
An agreezen= shall be 'entered into betTeen the
County and the Developer, binding on the Developer,
hie a~signs or ~ucce~sor~ regarding any interim
15
treatment facilities to be utilized. The agreement
must be legally sufficient to th. County, prior to
the approval of conatzn3ction documents for the
project and De in conformance with the requirements
of Collier County Ordinance No. 8B-76, as amended.
4. If an interim on-site 'water supply, treatment and
transmission facility ia ~tllizad to serve the
project, it must be properly sized to. supply average
peak day domestic demand, in addition to fire flo~
demand et a rate approved by the gppropriete Fire
Control Distric: servicing the project area.
5. Prior to approval of construction documents by the
County, the Developer must present verification
pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Status, that the
Florida Public Service Co~ission has granted
territorial right5 to the Developer to provide sewer
and/or water service to the project until the County
can provide these sex-vices through its water and
sewer facilities.
6. The utility construction documents for the project's
sewerage system shall be prepared to contain the
design and construction of the on-site force main
which ~ill ~ltimately connect the project to the
future central sewerage facilities.of, the District
in the Ir-~.okalee Road rights-of-uny. The force main
~u~t ~ extended from the main on-alta p%hnp statio~d~
to the west rights-of-way line of /mmokalee Road an~
capped. It must be interconnected to the ~uO]
station with appropriately located valves to per, it
for simple redirection of the project's sewage when
connection to the County's central sewer facilities
becomes available.
7. The on-site water distribution system to se.-ve the
project must be connected to the District's 12 or
16 inch water main on the ~outh side of Xr. uokales
Road, extended eastward to the east boundary line
of =ha project consistent ~ith the main sizing
re%/uirenents specified in the County's Water Master
Plan. The coordination for the location and sizing
of the ~ain extension shall be processed through the
County Utility Division. During design of these
facilities, the following features shall be
incorporated into the distribution system:
a. Dead end mains shall be eliminated by looping
'the internal pipelihe network.
b. Stubs for future system interconneotion with
16
west, and tbs smuth property lines of
project, et locations to be zutually agreed to
by the County and the DmYelcp.r during th.
design phase of thm ;roJect.
Note: Revie~ record drawings and/or master plan for
location and ~izs of mains. Stubs to be provided
to any adjacent properties. If possible, stipulate
intarconnection ~o adjacent devmloped properties,
unless the adJacmnt systsm Is ~aste~ metmrad.
1. Da%ailed paving, grading, sit,'drainage'end utility
plans shall be submitted to Project Revie~ Se.vices
for review. ::o construction permits shell he i~sued
unless and until approval of the
cons=ruction in eccordenc4 ~ith the suhnitled plans
is granted by Project Review Services.
2. Design and construction of ell improvenen%s shell
ke subject to compliance with the appropriate
provisions of the Collimr County Sukdivi~ion
Re~u!e%ions.
3. Ac=~ss into each trio% as sho'.~ on the c:ncep~ual
P.U.D. Master Plan i~ informational only. Location
and nurber is subject to subdivision Mas%er Plan
approval.
4. ~efore const~action plans apprmval, the acTass road
to the ~ite shall be dedicated and accepte~
Collier County for maintenance purpose~.
5. A minimum of 20 feet setback from th* edge of
conservation area which in silence will be the
rmTcired 20 feet maintenance easamsnt will be
(i.e. South Florida Water Management District,
De~artzent of Environmental Regulation) re~-uire a
more strict setback, plans shall reflect the :ore
~trlct.
6. The wetland preserve may not be utilized for
landscaping purposes.
7. The local street for this project shell be
according to the typical section for Collector
Street as re~uired in Article XI, ~ection 6 of the
Subdivision Re~lations, or a~ othe~i~e re,ired
a% the ~ine of construct[on plan approval.
~7
~CTION VIII
WATER KANA~EMINT R~QUI?'-MiNT$
6.1
The purpose of thie section is to set fo~h the
stipulations elta~!lshed by the Water Managtment Advisory
Board, ~hich -eha!l be acco~¢dated by the project
developer. ,.
l. Detailed paving, grading' and al~e ~draina~e plans
shall Me su.b~itted to County ProJec~ Review ~ervicel
for review. No cona%ructlon~er~ite shall bm
unless and un~il approval' of the prc~cse~
is ~ran~ed ky County ProJt:: Revie~ Se~;ices.
2. Ccnstr~c~ion cf all ~zter m&nagemen~ facilities
shall he s'~Jt:: ~o co:pliance ~i~h %he a~propria:e
prc'/islons cf the Collier County Subdivision
Regu!ation~.
3. ;.n Excavation Pe~it ~ill bm reTuire~ for ~he
proposed ~et!and in accordance wi~h Collier County
Ordinance No. ~-26 and $~-~D ~le~.
4. De=ailed paving, grading and sl~a drainage plan~
shall Me m'~nitted ~o Project Revie~-Se~ice~ for
r~Tie%'. );o con~t~ction pe~l:s shall ~e issu~
un!,ss and until approval of the
constrcc~ion is gran~e4 in accordance wi~h ~
· '~zi~ted plan~ ~y ProJec% Revie~ Se~ice~. ·
5. )-n Ex:~va%ion Peri% ~ill ~e re~ired for ~e
proposed l~ke(~) in accordance wl%h Collier County
ordinance No. Sa-2S and SF.~D~les. The lake mhall
he re!coated a minim~ 200 feet from the we~lan4 and
increased in alee ~o mae% South Florida Wa~er
Eana~zen~ District retirements, unless
by South Florida Water Management Di~t:ic~
~. A Flor!da Dependent of Transpo~a~lon an4
Ylori~ Water Mana~eman~ Dia~ric~ peri% approval
~o ou%fall in%o ~ha Cocoha%chee Canal shall
a~i~%e~ ~efore con~c~ion plane approval.
7. A cc;y of ~he South Florida Water Mana~e:ent
Di~tric~ pe~it or Early Work pe~lt and Co~a
~ineara ~e~lt ia re~ired prior ~o
~lan.a~prcval.
18
0
/ /
0 \
0 ~-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 906, AS
AMENOED, ALSO KNOWN AS NEAPOiJTAN PARK PUD, W"HICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQU~IRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT,
HAS NOT COMMENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION [7.3.4 OF THE
COtJJER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, RESULTit~3 IN ~ I~BSIBLE
COURSES OF ACTION FOR THE OOAT~) OF COUNTY COMMISSICA~ERS TO ~DER.
~ Staff it requesting that the Board review staff's findings and recomme~:ta~s
regarding the Neapolitan Park PUD.
CONSIDERATIOI~J,,~[;. This PUD wes originally approved on January 23, 1990. Section 2.7,3.4 of
the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the project developer subm;'t an annual
report on the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary of the PUD
approval by the Board of County Ccmmissioners. The singular purpose of this report is to
evaluate whether or not the project has commenced in earnest in accord·nc· with the cdt·ri·
t~et forth in Section 2.7.3.4, For those PUDs approved pdor to the effective date of adoption of
the Land Development Code, the five year approval pedod commenced on the adoption date,
October 30, 1991. The,'efore, the conditions set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. are applicable ·s of
October 30, 19c~5.
The above referenced PUD has boen identified as a project which was approved pdor to
October 30, 1991 ·nd which has not commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7,3.4.
Staff has utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report, supplemented by field observation
3nd review of in house records to verify the current status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Bo·rd consistent with the options provided in Section 2,7.3.4 (1) & (2).
Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2.7.3.4.
o
Time limits for approved PUD master plans, in the event that · PUD
m·s~er plan is given approval, and the landowner(s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or · development order
f=r all infrastructure Improvements to Include ut/i/t/es, roads end
sh;lilar improvement= required by ;he approved PUD master plan or
other development orders for at least 15 percent of the gros~ land
· rea of the PUD site every five years of the date of approval by the
Board of County Commissioners; and
of PUDs consisting of nonresidential uses, 30 percent of the to~
approved gross leasable floor area wlthln the PUD every six
the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
Fall to receive final local development orders for at least 15 percent of
the total number of approved dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case
-1-
1 8 1997
The project developer shall submit to the Planning Services Director
a atatu# Plport on the progress of development annually commencing
c)~ the fifth anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County Comml~sionera. The singular purpose of the report will be to
evaluafe whether m' not the project has commenced In earnest In
accordance with the criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has commenced in earne~ then the land shall retain its
existing PUD approval and shall not be subject to additional re~'tew
znd consideration o! new development standards or usa modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has not commenced In earne~f~ then upon review and
consideration of the report provided by the owner and any
· upplemental Information that may be provided, the Board o'/County
Commlulonere shall elect one of the following:
To e~,~end the current PUD approval for a maximum period of two
years; at the end of which time, the owner will again submit to the
procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be consistent with the
growth management plan. The existing PUD shall remain In effect
until subsequent action by the Board on the submitted amendment of
the PUD.
ff the owner falls to submit an amended PUD within six months of
board action to require such an amended submittal, then the Board
may initiate proceedings to rezone the unimproved portions of the
original PUD to an appropriate zoning classification consistent with
the Future Land Use Element of the GrowfJ? Management Plan.
In the case of Developments of Regional Impact, time limit restric'Jons
shall be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time limits contained
within the application for development approval and approved as pert
of a development order in conformance with F.S. 5c 380.06.
-2-
NO. ~
btAR .1. 8
P~. ~
~;vrm;:~t8 ~f A~r~re~ed I.~n;I U~,e~: This 20 acre PUD was approved for commercial uses,
office o~ motel uses (maximum motel density is 2B units per acre), ACLF (maximum density of
26 u~its p~' acm), and multi-family sl~uctures et 16 units per acre.
Cor~_?h~rtc¥ with Comprehe.rt.s. ive G_row~h Man~nt Plan; ~e subj~ PUD is ~in an
A~ ~ (~nta ~ara ~u~va~ and Da~s ~va~). ~ ~ s~ ~ of ~
~v~ ~ u~s, ~ PUD ~s ~en dete~i~ to ~ consis~ ~ ~ ~r ~n~
~ ~rm~nt P~n. ~ ~ns~ Rafi~ Systom ~es f~ a m~imum ~ ~in
~ A~ ~nter of 26 un~s ~r a~e for motels and ACLFs and 16 un~ ~r a~ f~ residential
~~nL During ~e Zoning R~val~Uon P~mm in 19~, ~is PUD ~s ~
~stent ~use ~ is ~in an A~v~ ~nter. ~e PUD is d~ ~sistent ~ ~
f~ GMP Elements: F~um ~ Use Element.
C~n$!stencv Wi~h the Collier County Land De. velopme, nt Cpde; The PUD has been
distributed to the appropriate jurisdictional review entities specifically for review of the PUD for
consistency with current land development regulations. Based on that review, the following
inconsistencies have been identified:
Environmental: An updated Environmental Impact Statement may be required.
Native vegetation retention requirement is not specifically stated.
FISCAL IMPACT: A two year extension of this PUD, as recommended by staff will have no
fiscal impact on Collier County.
STAFF RECOMM,ENDATIQN: Based on a comprehensive review of this PUD document, Staff
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant a two year extension to the
Neapolitan Park PUD.
-3-
FRE~CHL, PLANNER II
CURRENT PLANNING
DATE
~-(:~T J. ML~LHERE, AICP, MANAGER DATE
CURRENT PLANNING . /',,
DONALD W. ARNOLD. AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
~/~.ING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, AC~INISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
PUD ~,UN~ET:NEAPOI. ITAN PARK PUD
-4-
No. ~.F..-~.,,Z.~- /
tilAR 1 8 1997
fl
~AR 1~
ORDINA~¢£ 90-. §
AN ORDINABCE AM~iNDING ORDINA/~CE
82-2 THE COMP~SIVK ZONING ~G~TIONS
FOR ~E ~INCO~TED ~ OF CO~I~
CO~, ~RIDA BY ~DING ~E OFFICI~
ZONING A~S ~ ~B~ 50-26-2 BY
~GING ~ ZONING ~SSIF~CATION OF ~E
TO "P~" ~D ~IT D~~ FOR
~~, ~L ON ~ (3) O~
· QU~ ~ OF O~ SPACE ON ~E
~ ~o~ ~ o~ ~ ~o~ ssn~ 6~,"
~ ~T OF ~A ~ BO~
~NSISTZNG OF 20~ A~S, ~ATZD iN
S~ION 4, TO~SHIP 50 SO~, ~GE 26
~, CO~I~ CO~, ~RIDA; ~D BY
PROVIDING ~ EFFE~IVE DATE.
WHEREAs, Robert Duane of Hole, Montes and Associates,
r.epresanting William M. Pogue, of Davis Boulevard Partners,
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of th~ 'herein described real'
property;
NOW, THEReFoRE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida:
SECTION ONE:
The Zoning Classification of the herein described real
property located in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2" to
"PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the pUD
document attached hereto es Exhibit "A" which is
incorporated herein end by reference made p~t hereof. The
Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 50-26-2, as
Ordinance Number 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly_= .
This Ordinance shall becoms effective upon rmceipt of
notice from the Secretary of Statm that this Ordinance hat
be,n filed with the $,cretary of State.
DATE: January 23, 1990
'~.~j
, ..' .ATTEst:'/ ' ~':'.-
-~ .. ,':~
,, v~ .... / ..%-, - ~,
KAPJORIE M. STUDLNT
A$$I$~kNT COUNTY ATTORNEy
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLI~ COUNTY, FLORIDA
~u3~-A.' ~SS~., ~., c~Z~U~
R-B9-17 PUD ORDINA.NCE
nb/2017
°o
NLkPOLITAN PA~K ' .
A PLA~%~D UNIT DL~ZLOI~T_NT
~A FILX NO. 88.228
715 Ttn~h Strte= Sou=h
N&pXeso Florida ~3940
(813} 262-4617
JANUARy 1990
EkqllB IT "A"
~ TA~T.~ OF COFrTNTS
I. STAT~F. NT OF CO.~PLIA2~C~' ............ ~ ........ '..... 1
II. FROPL~/~..TY O%,'~TE~L~HIp, L~GAL DESCRIPTION AND
SHORT TITLE AND L~.~I~IED CONTROL ................. 2
III. STAT~KF. RT 0]~ INTLD~T AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..... 3
IV. GE}~Z~AL DL~W'~LO~HI~TT R~GUL~TIONS ................. 4-10
V.. TRANSPORTATION R~QUIR~H]DrTS ..................... 11
VII. ENGIN~F. RING A~D UTILITIES REQUIP. E~,.NTS .......... 14-19.
Ao
CONCEPTUAJ~ MASTER PLAN
STATIMINT Or CO~{PLIANCE
The pUr~oee of ~his section is ~o set for~ch how ~hm ~ro~osed
~tv~lopmmn= complies wl~ all a~ltcabll rm~ireuen=s of
Boulevard Pa~nera on ~0 ac e~ of prope~y loca=%d in Sec=ion
Collier County development ~la~lons and ~he in=em= of ~he Davis
of To, ship 50 Sou=h, Range 2S East. The name of:=htz PUD is
be Neapolitan P~rk. The ~evelop~en~'o~ ~l~ 'Planne~
Devalopmen~ ~lll be in co=pi!ante with the planning goal~ a~
objectives of Collier County aa se~ forth in ~he Gro~h
.Plan. This Compliance includes:
1. The S~Jec= propa~y is located in an aras lden~ifted as an
Activity Center in ~e Gro~h ~anageuen= ~lan for Collier
County.
2. Activity ten,era are the Preferred locations for
co~cen=ra=ion of co~*rcial and mixe~ uae ~evelopnent
ac~tvi~tes. The proposa~ developman= includes a mix
re~ail, office, and ra~lden~ial uses, ~o satisfy
.cri~erla.
3. The project development la pla~ed =o tnCO~orata na=ur~.
ays%ems, existing and ~a~ade fo
aCcordance with ~heir natural
4. Provisions are included in the project to minimize ~he n~er
ingress and egress points onto Davis BOulevard by providing
for provisions for shared access wl:h adjoining prope~ies.
~e project shall be In compliance ~l=h all applic~le County
radiations including ~he Gro~h Management Plan.
~e project will be ae~ed by a complete range of se~lces and
utilities as approved by ~e County.
The project is compatible with adjacent land uses ~rough ~e
internal arrangement of st~c~ures, ~e placemen~ cf land ~e
buffers, and ~e proposed development Standards contained
herein.
~e Planned Unit Development includes e~enstve open spaces
which are Prese~ed from future der
e~ance %heir natural function .~ ~39pmen= In order
amenity. . s .... ~ se~e cs a proJec~
PROP£RTy OWNrR~HTp, ~
~HOR~ TIT~ & ~IFI~D CONSOL
2.1 ~m s~J,c= prope~y is ~rren:ly o~,d byf'"
Davis Boulevard Pa~nmrs
2.2 The S~Ject prope~y Il described ~o follow~:
The Zaa~ 1/2 of ~he Southwest 1/4 of ~he Southwest 1/4
Section 4, To~hip 50 Sou~h, Range 26 Eaa~; leas ~he
75 feet ~ereof reae~ed for road ri~ht-of-~ay (Davis
Boulevard), Collier County,
2.3 This Ordinance ~hall De ~o~ and Cited aa ~he "Neapolitan
Park Planned Unit Development Ordinance..
It la the intent of Davis Boulevard Pa~nerl to eltadlish & Placid
Unit Devllopment on '20 lcfii An ~ection 4, TO,ship 50 ~ou~, ~ngl
2~ East, Collier County, Florida.
~e s~Ject prope~y il ~der unified O~erlhip for ~e pu~os;'of
obtaining ~D zoning.
Development of ~ls Planned Unit will oc~r in accordance wi~ ~e
s~mltted ~D ra~la=lonm and any conditions approved with the
rezone petition as described and-agreed =o wi~in =his ~D
doc~ent.
SECTION III
STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJ_rCT DESCRIPTION
Unit Development. It is 'the purpcsa~of this document to set
forth flexible gufdelines for the future davelcpment of the
project that meet accepted planning principles and practices .
end to implement the Gro~h Managammnt Plan.
Development Plan. $~bsequant or concurrent with PUD
approval a Su-bdivi$1on Master Plan shall be submitted for
the entire a ma
r included in ~he PUD Master Plan. All
divisions of property and ~he development of the land
shall be in compliance with ~hs Subdivision Regulations.
'- ii) The provimions of Section 10.5 of the Zoning Ordinance
shall apply to the development of all plettld tracts, or
parcels of land as provided in said Sect-ion 10.5
to the issuance of a building permit or othe~ Pri°rO
developmenl
order.
3.3 SITE CLEkRING ~3D DRAINA~ -.
Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be
performed in accordance with applicable Collier County Codes
and Ordinances and the mtandards and commitments of this
document.
3.4
~T$ FOR UTIL!TIE.~
Easements, where reqUired, shall be provided for water
management areas, utilities and other purposes aa may be
needed.
Ail necessary easements,., dedications or other instruments
shall be ~ranted to insure the continued operation end
maintenance of all serwicts and utilities. This will be in
s~bstantial compliance with applica~la re~lations in effect
at the time approvals are reqUested.
SXCTION IV
G£N£RAL DZV~LO~NT R~GULATZONS
~o ~u~olm of ~l Sec:ion Il ~o 'delinea~e an~ ~lnerally
deserve ~e proJec: plan of development, ~ha xeapec:ive land
uses included In ~he proJec:, al' well as :he project's
develo~en~ criteria. ·
Re~lation~ for deve!op~en~ shall ~e t~ ~cc°r~a~ce ~t~h ~he
Jtandarda ~a~ forth in :hie documen:. ~ere specific
developmen~ s~andar~s are no~ se~ forth, applicable
developmen: standard~ of ~he Collier County Zonln~ ordinance
eball apply ~ha~ are in effec~ a~ the ~ime of applica~ion for
the relevant
4.~ ~D USE INT~NSITIE~
Tracts one (1), an~ ~wo (2), and ~rea (3) ~ha: fron~
Davt~ Blvd. are pe~it~ed %he full range of cc~ercial uses
tden~ified in Sec:ion 4.4. Trac~ four (4) la pe~ikted office
'.or motel u~e only, and :tact five (5) residential land uses.
The following table aet~ fo~ ~e maxim~ yields
on each tract. .
'. Approx.
Tract '~ ' Acreage Intensity
One Co~mercial 1.20 .25 Bld Coverage
Two Commercial 1.20 .25 Bid Coverage
Three Commercial 1.10 .25 Bid Coverage
Four Office/Motel* 6.2 150,000 a.f.
Five M.P. Res.** 6.9 81 units***
Motel uses may be develope~ at a density of 26 units per
acre. Densities not utilized on .Tract five ($) may be
transferred to Tract four (4) for the construction of
additional motel units.
ACLF units may also be developed at a density up to 26
unite per acre in accordance with ~e standards of this
ordinance. ..
Multi-family units (MF) may be developed up to 16 units
per acre.
b. ~d~t ¢o~ra~a~e ~iving
c. ~rcup and cl~a~sr hou~.~ng. '
ree!de~lal r
a ess or for ~renelen~
faci2tties, lodging
B. ]~r~IDENTIAL DE%~LOp.~fE_~T
a. ~ - Sixteen (16) dwelling units
per acre
b. ~l~ll41~t W~_~jl _ One Bundred rtf~y
fae~ O~
1. From Tract ~o~nda~ - ~ln~ 1~ fe~
2. From Vehicular Use ~ea - ~tn~ 10 f~et
from Oeslqnatad ~etland and/or Wa~er~y
4. From Vehicular Driveway and/ct S~ee2 -
~' ~Helch~ of Z~e~url- _ Fo~y (40} ~ee~.
e. ~l Be~ween S~c~ur~ . B~Cvaen any two
(2) Principal s~c~uraj on the sa:e parcel
~lre shall be provided a distance e~al
one-half (1/2) ~e iq of their heights.
f' ~~ - Slx Hundred (600~ a~are
feet for one (1) bedroom unt~s and seven
hundred fifty (?S0} for ~wo (2) bedroom units,
and nine hundred (~00} a~are fee~ for three
(~} bedroom umt~a.
g' ~ - 1 acre.
h. ~ininun Off Street Parkl~u - Per the
requirements of the Collier County Zoning
ordinance.
The following development .standards shall apply to
the assisted ca a living facilitl%s - ACLF:
r
a.
Maximum Number of ACLF Un,ts heP. Acre - ~wanty
six (26) units per acrl. ... -
kS:×imun ACLF Unft Ar~ - Four ~undred (400) '.
square fee~ for efficiencies, five hundred
(500) for one bedrooms and six hundred and
fifty (650) for two bedrooms. . .
R~uuire~ Parkin~ SDace~ - One space per three
ACLF beds plus cna space per two employees.
Ce
Acceeso.-y uses to support housing, for the
elderly such as centralized eating areas,
recreational facilities, sundry retail Uses and
other similar kinds of uses.
a. All other development standards shall be in
accordance.with development standards of this
document. 'Adult Congregate Living Facility
shall be defined aa set forth in Chapter
400.402, Florida Statutes.
Spatial relationships for structures resulting
from this permitted use shall be determined at
the tine of Site Plan Approval' application
submission pursuant to Section 10 S of the
Zoning Ord!.nance:- '
1. ~ and StruCtures~ No building or structure, or
Part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or
land or water used, in whole or in part, for other
than the follow~ng:
2. Permitted Pr~nc~nal Uses and Structure~
a. Antique shops; appliance stores; art studios;
art supply shops; automobile parts stores;
automobile service stations, with repairs as
an accessory use (in accordance w'lth the
standards of Section 9.S of the Zoning
Ordinance); -
b. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops: bank~ smd
financial institutions; barber and beauty
shops; ba~h supply stores; bicycle sales and
services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book
stores; business machine se~vices.
c. Car washes; ca.-pst and floor covering sales -
whi%h may include storage and installation;
churches and o~hsr places of worship (in
accordance vlth ~hs standard~ of section 8.11
' of the Zoning Ordinanc,); clothing I'o ms,
cock=ail lounges (in accordance with ~m
· tandardl of Section 8.11 'of the Zoning
Ordinance); co~trciil rlcre~tion UIml -
candy s~ores. . '.
d~ cleaning zhops; d~ goods=orms,, and
drap,~ shops.
e. ~lmctrical ~upply store~; m~ipment rentals,
including ia~ mowers and power ~aws.
f. Fish mark,~ -.retail only; florist shops;
fratm~al ~d social cl~s (in accordance wi~
the ~tandards of Section S.ll of ~m Zoning
Ordinance); funeral homms~ fu~iturm s~ormm~
fu~lmr mhops. ..
.and rear yards; gift shops; glass and m%=or
sales - including storage and installerS;
h. ~ardware storms; hat cleaning and blocking;
health fo~ stores; honms for the agmd;
hospitals and ho~pices.
I. Ice creamItores.
J. Jewel~ stores.
k. ~un4ries - self se~ice only; leather go~s;
1. Mark~t~ - f~od; markmts - meat, medical offices
and clinics; millinm~ shops; motels and
hotml~; motion picture theatrms; museums; music
m. New car dealerships - outside display
permitted; news stores; nigh= clubs (in
accordance with the standards of Section 8.~1
of the Zoning Ordinance).
n. OffiCe - general; office supply stores.
o. Paint and wallpaper ~tores;'~'pet shops; pet
supply shops; photographic ec~4ipment stores;
pottery stores; printing; 'publishing and
mimeograph services eh~ps; private clubs (in
accordance with the standards of'e~ction 8.11);
professional offices.
P. Radio and television sales and servicms; radio
station (offices and studios), and auxiliary
transmitters and receiving equipment, but not
principal transmiusion tower; rest homes;
restaurants - including drive-in or fast food
restaurants; (in accordance with the standards
of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance).
q. Shoe repair; shoe stores; shopping centers;
souvenir stores; stationery stores;
supermarkets and sanatoriums.
r. Tailor shops; taxidermists; t~le sales -
ceramic tile; .tobacco shops; toy Ihopa;
tropical fish stores.
s. Upholstery shops.
t. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles
only; veterinarian offices and clinics - no
outside kennels.
u. Watch and precision instrument repair shops.
v. Any other commercial use or Professional
service which is comparable in nature with the
foregoing uses and which the County Manager or
his designee determines to be comparable to and
compatible With the foregoing uses.
Accessor~ Uses
= a. Accessory uses and structures customary in
. commercial, and residential areas including
.. recreational facilities sewage treatment plant
facilities and other essential services.
4.5
CQM~fERCIAL DEVE-LOPME:~ STAN~ARD.~
1. ~/nimum Eot Area - Twenty thoueand (20,000) a~-uare
feet.
SIGNAGE
A.
Minimum Yar~ Remuire~ents £~ternal 'Prodect
a. L~ont Yar~ - Fifty (SC). feet a~ measured fro~
Davis ~oulevard right-of-way and' twenty
feet from any interior right-of-way.
Sidl YaF~ - None, or a minimum of five (5) feet
with unobs~:-ucted passage from front to rear
yard.
c. Rear Yard - T~enty-five (25) feet.
Inter,or Access Driv~ - A minimum fifteen '(15) feet
building setback shall be provided from the interior
access drive.
Minimum Floor Area of Structu~ - One thousand
(1,000) square feet per building on ~he
floor.
~ - The maximum height of any commercial
structure on lot (4) will be sixty (60) feati~md
thirty-five (35) feet for lots one (1), t~o (2) and
three (3).
~ Lot Width - One hundred fifty (1~0) feet.
The developer intends to crea~e a uniformly designed
special eignage and.identification system including but
not limited to subdivision and entrance eigns for ~he
project to compliment the intended development themes and
architectural styles. Such signs are intended to be
located and permitted at all project entrance points as
well ae at other etra~egically identified areas and will
be enforced through restrictive covenants and/or
architectural controls. Ail signage shall be in
co:pliance with the Sign Ordinance for Collier County.
Utilization of the right-of-ways for landscaping
decorative entrance ways, and slgnage shall be reviewed
and approved by the County Engineer and County Manager
and his designee consisten~l~h acceptable engineering
practices to insure pedestrian and vehicular safety.
4.6
4.7
A. A minimum ten (10) foot landscape buffer will be
maintainmd along the east, west, and north proper~y lines
in accordance with ~ha standards, of Section 8.37 cf t. ha
Zoning Ordinance.
B. Along ~_ha eastern and western boundaries of lots four (4)
and five (5) a twenty-five eeC. back shall.be provided
which no st~c=urmm or ~arking will'.bm
Existing vegetation will be lef~ In plac~utsidm ~e
foot landscape buffer wi~ln ~is area. to provide
additional screening to adjoining prope~ies.
C. A minin~ ten foot (10) buffer will be maintained at
should it be re,ired.
~E~IONS TO SUBD~ISION REGU~TIONS
approved by the County Engineer but n~ed not meat
U.S.D.O.T.F.K.W.A. Manual of Unifo~ Traffic Control
Dmvicms. Street pavmmmnt painting, street striping, and
rmfl.ctivm edging rm~lrmmmnts may be waived.
b. A~icle XI, S~ction 10: ~ retirement to
mon~mnts in a t~lcak water valve cov~r shall bm
Mon~mnts shall bm inmtall.d in accord wi~
standards and ~hall bm approvmd by ~m County ~gl~er.
c. ~iclm XI, Smction 21: ~ retirements for
utility casings shall bm waived if all utilitims are
ln~tall,d prior to const~ction of thm street base ~
d. ~iclm XI, Smction 17 j:' ~ rm~irmment ~at
streets have a minim~ tangent of 100 femt
intersections shall bm 4atm~in.d at ~ time
s~mittal of const~ction plans.
e. A~iclm XI, Section 17 K:' ~ retirement ~at
say be m~ified at ~e time of s~mittal of
plans.
f. A~lclm XI, Section 17F: Sixty (60} .fee= of right-of-
way shall be dedicated instead of the eight-four (~4)
fee= re.ired.
Developer ~hall provide st.-end streets =o access the
adjacent parcels, where a~]lcable.
10
5.1
SECTION V
TR~NS PORTATIO?~ RZQUIR~MINTS
The developer shall:
a. Subject to Florid· Dap·rinse= cf Tr·nsp~r=·t!on approve1,
and shall provide · fair share 'contribution tow·rd the
capital cost of · tr·fflc signal ~hmn dee~ed warranted' .
by the County. The signal will be owned, operated end
maintained by Coll!mr County.
b. The developer shall provide ar~erial level street
1A~hting at ~be project entrance.
c. The three out parcels shall have internal access only.
They mhall have no direct access to Davis Boulevard.
d. The developer shall provide sixty (60) feet cf additional
right-of-way along the north side of Davis Boulevard for
-. water management/transpor~ation purposes.
e. ~ullding setback~ from ~he ~avis Boulevard Righ=-of-W
shall be a. minimum of.~ifty (50) feet. ' aO
f. Ail traffic control devices used, excluding street.name
signs, shall conform with ~he Manual on Uniform TrafXJe
~~ as required by Chapter 316.0747, FlorAd~
g. These improvemen~s are considered "site related" as
defined in Ordinance ~$-55 and shall no= be applied as
credits t~ward any impact ~ees required by that
ordinance. The improvements shall he in place before any
certificates of ~ccupancy are issued.
h. Payment of Impact Fees shall be made at ~he time of
building permit issuance and ~he amount of the faa shall
, be in accordance with the effectivs fee schedule per
ordinance. ..
i. The subdivision master plan shall be revised to provide
a stub street along the north and west boundary of the
plan in the location depicted by th& westerly directed
arrow.
6.1
SECTION VZ
EI'~'ZRO~TAL STANDARDS
The purpose of this Section is to set forth ~he stipulations
established by the £nv~ronmental Advisory Council.
A. A prese~ation area comprisln~ a~6ut t~o ~
In th. north eas~e~ potion cf ~he ~roJec~. ~is irma
is intended to provide protmc~ion for a c~ress s~and.
Only uses dete~inmd to be consil~ln= ~ith ~he goal of
prese~ing ~is area shall be
B. Petitioner shall be s~Jec~ to Ordinance No. 75-21 as
amended by Ordinance Sg-Sa (prese~a=ion of native
habitat).
Petitioner shall be subJec~ to Ordinance No.
amended by Ordinance a9-57 (use of native species in
landscaping).
Petitioner shall be s~Ject to Ordinance No. S2-37
amended by Ordinance. ag-S3 (removal of exit.lc ~pecie~).
Petitioner =hall be a~Ject to the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.3 (diacove~ o~ an
archaeological or historical site, a~ifact or o~er
indicator of pre~a~ation).
Pe~itionar ~hall obtain and s~nit doc~entation of all
neceaaa~ local, state and federal pe~its.
In the event active protected species foraging habitat,
nests or burrows are encountered during ~evalopnen~
activities, the Collier County Planning Se~lces
Znviro~ental Review staff shall be notified i~ediately
and project designs may Me adjusted, If watt, tad.
(Collier County Comprehensive Plan poli~ S.3.4).
Protected plan~ species (Mut~erfly orchid an4 wll~ pine)
and those sighted during development activities shall
protected from inJu~ or relocated on alee, preferably
to presage or landscape areas. The. existing
a~ wall as the transplanting locations, if warranted,
· hall be identified on the site plan.
The con~e~ation aea
r shall be delineated by a signed and
sealed professional su~e~n the site plan.
12
Jo
Mo
Lo
A natural vaget&tion buffer shall ba required around
protected wetlands at least tin (10) flit wldl.
Control structure elevations in protected, created or
restored wetlands shall be established to ~aintain or
improve adequate hydroperiods.' The control structure
elevation shall be designed to meet the requirements of
South Florida Water Management District and Collier
County Engineering end Water Managemant D~par-.nsnt.
Quantitative criteria for mitigatkon Ih'all' be bassd on'-
the results of final field determinations made by the
South Florida Water Management District and Collier
County Znvironmsntal staff at the tiue. of lite
development plan approval. Compensation pro osals shall
provide reasonable assurance that resource ~pacts vi11
be offset.
i. Mitigation plans proposed in vetlandl to be
Presaz-ved, restored, enhanced shall include a
dlscription of area (location and size), vegetation
proposed to .be planted, source of vegetation
(transplantation from .impacted areas prefarrmd)
hydrologic regime, exotic vegetation remova.O
monitoring and ~aintsnance plan.
ii. Miti~ati~n proposed in upland areas shall emphasize
establishment of habitat value. Vegetation retained
and supplemented shall focus on wildlife vslue-a~d
establishment of native vegetative #communities-.
iii. Iake mitigation in the lake desig~ated on conceptual
site plan shall include littoral zone plantings of
nativs, aquatic vegetation.
Petition shall be subject ~o all Collier County
Ordinances in effect at commencement of construction.
SECTION VII
ENGINEERING ;eND UTILITIES R~QUIR/.~NTS
7.1
PURPOS£
The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities
reTuiraments which must be accommodated .by the project
developer. -..
A. Water distribution and sewage c~llection and
transmission systems will be const.-ucted throughout
the project development by the developer pursuant
to all current requirements of Collisr County and
the State of Florida. Water and sewer facilities
constructed within platted rights-of-way or within
utility easements required by the County shall be
conveyed to the County for ownership, operation and
maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate County
Ordinances and regulations in effect at the time
of conveyance. All water and sewer facilities
constructed on private property and not required by
the County to be located within utility easements
shall be owned;, opsrated and maint~ined by the
developer, his &sstgn~ or successors. Upon
completion of construct/on of the water and
facilities within the project, the facilities
be tested to ensure they meet Collier County,s
utility construction requirements in effect at the
time construction plans are approved. The abovs
tasks must ~s completed to the satisfaction of the
Utilities Division prior to placing any utility
facilities, either County owned or privately owned,
into service. Upon completion of the water and/or
sewer facilities and prior to the issuanc& of
Ca~ificates of Occupancy for structures within the
project the utility facilities shall be convsymd
the County, when required by the Utilities Division,
pursuant to County Ordinances and regulations in
effect at the time conveyance is requested.
All construction plans and technical specifications
and proposed plats, if applicable, for the proposed
water distribution and sewag~ collection and
transmission facilities must be reviewed and
approved by the Utilities Division prior to
commencement of construction.
14
Ail cuotomere connecting to the water dis~ribution
and sewage collection facilities will be customers
of the County end will be billed by the County in
accordance with the County's established rates.
Should t~e County not be in a position to provide
water and/or sewer service to the project, ~he water
and/or sewer customers ehall ba'.cuetomers of the
interi= utility established to eerve ~he project
until the County'e off-site water and/or sever
facilities are evailable tq serve =~* project.
It is anticipated that the coud=y U=~li~ies Division'
will ultinately supply potable wa=ar to meet the
consumptive demand and/or receive and treat the
sewage genera=ed My =hie project. Should ~he County
system not be in a position to eupply po=tble wa=er
to the project and/or receive the project's
waetewater at the time development cc-~ences, the
Developer, at hie expense, will install and operate
interim water eupply end on-site savage treatment
and disposal facilities adequate to ueet all
requirenents oft he appropriate regul&toryagencies.
An agreem,nt ~hall be entered into between the
County and the developer, binding on the developer~
his assigns or successors, legally acceptable to
County, prior ~o the approval of ~onstruction -.
documents for the proposed project, stating ~hat:
1. The proposed water suppiy and on-site treat~%~t
facilities and/or on-site waetewater treatment
and disposal facilities, if required, are to
be constructed aa part of the proposed project
and must be regarded as interim; they shall be
constructed to S%ate and Federal standards and
are to be owned, operated and maintained by the
developer, hie assigHe or euccessors, until
such tine as ~he County's off-site water
facilitte~ and/or off-site sewer facilities are
available to service the project. The interim
treatment facilities ehall supply services only
to those lands owned by ~he developer and
approved by.~he County for development. The
utility facility(les) may not be expanded to
provide water and/or sewer service outside the
development boundary approved by the County
without the written consen~ of the County.
2. Upon connec~ion to the County's off-site water
facilities, and/or sewer facilities, the
developer, his assigns or successors ~hall
abandon, dismantle and remove fron ~he site the
15
and discontinue usa of tha water supgly source,
if applicable, in a ~anner consis=ant with
State of Florida standards. All work related
with ~his activity shall be perfo.-mad at no
cost to the County.
Conmection to the County's off-site water
and/or sewer facilities will be made by the
owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost
to ~ha County within 90 d~ys after such
facilities become available; '. The cost of
connection shall include, but 'not be limited
to, all engineering daa~gn and preparation of.
construction documents, permitting,
modification or refitting of sewage pumping
facilities, interconnection with County off-
site facilities water and/or sewer lines
necessary to ~ake the connection(s), etc.
At the time County off-site water and/or sawer
facilities are available for the project ~o
connect with, ~he following water and/or sewer
'facilities shall be conveyed to the County
pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and
Regulations in effect at the time:
(a) Ail water and/or sewer facilities
constructed in publicly o~ed right.~-of-
way or within utility easements required -'.
by ~ha County within the project limits
will be required to make connection~&ith
the County's off-site water and/or se~er
facilities; or,
(b) Ail water and sewer facilities required
to connect the project to the County's
. off-site wa"cer and/or sewer facilities
when the on-mite water and/or sewer
facilities are constructed on private
property and not required by the County
to be located within utility easements,
including but not limited to the
following:
(1) ~ain sewage lift station and force
main interconnecting with the County
sewer facilities including all
utility easements, necessary.
(2) Water distribution facilities from
the point of connection with the
County's water facilities to the
master water meter serving ~he
project, including all u~ility
easements necessary.
5. The'customers sa~vad on an interim basis by ~he
utility system constructed by the davel¢ger
shall become customers o~ the County at the
time when County off-site wa~ar and/or Sewer
facilities are available to Jerve ~%e project
and such connection, is ma~e. ~ior
connec~ion o~ ~ha p~oJe~ ~o ~he'Ooun~y,s
site water and/or fe~er facili~iaa
developer, his assigns or successors, shall
turn over =o the County a complete lis= of the
customers ~e~ed by the interim utilities
system and ~hall no= compete with the-County
for the se~ice of those customers.
developer shall also provide the County ~i~
a detailed tnvento~ of the facilities
wi~in ~e proJec= and the entity which will
be r.aponsible for the water and/or sewer
· e~ice billing for the project.
6. All con~c~ion plans and tec~l~l
specifications relate~ to connaction~ to
~h
Co~ty'a o~f-aite water and/or s~war faciliti
will be s~mitted to the Utilities Division for
review and approval prior to co~ancement
7. The daveloper, his aesigns or successors, a~aa
to pay all system developmen~ ~arges a~ ~e
time that building pe~lta are re.ired,
pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and
Re~lations in effect at the ~lme of petit
re~e~t. ~is retirement shall be nada
to all prospective buyer~ of prope~iea for
which building pe~its will be re~ire4 prior
to the sta~ of building const~ction.
S. ~e County will lease to ~e Developer for
operation and maintenance ~e water
distribution and/or sewage collection and
transmission system for the s~ of $10.00 per
year, when such system is not connected %o the
off-site wa=ar and/or ~ewer facilities
and operated by the County. Te~ of the lease
shall be dete~lned upon completion of ~e
proposed utility const~ction and prior
activation of the water supply treatment and
17
distribution facilities and/or ~he sewage
collection, transmission and treatment
facili=ies. Ths lease, if red, ired, shall
re~ain in elf%ct until ~he County can provide
~azer and/or se~e- se.-vice through its off-site
facilities or until such time that bulk rate
water and/or sewer service agreements are
sez-ving the project.
F. Data required under Count~'
.Ordinance No. 80Jl12
showing the availability of sewage ae--%'lce must be .
submit=ed and approved by the Utilities Division
prior to approval of the construction documents for
the project. A copy of the approved D~R per.-its
must ~e submitted for the sewage collection and
transmission systems and the wastewater treatment
facility to be utilized, upon receipt thereof.
G. If an interim on-site water supply, treatment and
transmission facility is utilized to serve the
proposed project, it must be properly sized to
supply average and peak day domestic demand, in
addition to fire flow demand at a rate approved by
the appropriate Fire Control District ssrvicing
project a aa
H. Constraction and %wnership of the water and sewer
facilities, including any proposed interim s&wage
treatment and disposal facility, shall be--in
compliance with all Utilities Division standards,
policies, ordinances, etc., in effect at the time
construction approval is requested.
I. Detailed hydraulic de%ignreports covering the water
distribution and sewage collection and transmission
the construction documents for the project. The
reports shall list all design assum~tions, demand
rates and other factors per~inent to the system
under consideration.
J. Prior to approval of construction documents by the
County, the Developer must present verification,
pursuant to Chapter 367 of the Florida Statutes,
that the Florida Public Se.-vice Co:m~ission has
granted territori~l rights to' the Develo ·
rov d. s.w.r s. ic, to th.
facilities g sewer
18
A. Ail out parcels shall hays internal access points
only. Access points shall be located in accordance
With Ord/nance 76-6 as amended, or Ordinance 82-
91. '
B. The roadway layout shall m~et a d&sign spied of 30
m.p.h. Appropriate signags shall ac¢onp&ny
detailed construct:ion pXans. '
Cul-de-sac turn-arounds w!~h a nin~=u~ pave=ant
radiu~ of 40' at all dasd-and parking a sas
r longer
than 300, shall be provided on detailed construction
plans.
D. A minimum building setback of twenty (20) feet fro~
the lake is required.
£. Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and
plans shall bl submitted to Project Review Services
for review. No construction permits shall be issued
unless and until approval of the proposed
construction in accordance with the submitted plans
is granted by Project, Review Services.
· '
F. Design and construction of all impr~vaments she1
be subject to ~ompliance with the appropriate -
provisions of the Collier County Subdivision
Regulations, except those listed in Ssction'~.7
herein. _
G. Work within Collier County right-of-way shall meat
the requirements of Collier County right-of-way
Ordinance 82-91.
H. The project shall be platted in accordance ~lth
Collier County Subdivision Regulations to define the
right-of-way, tracts, and easements as sba'an on t. he
conceptual P.U.D. Master Plan.
I. A copy of the FDOT permit shall bm provided prior
to construction.plan approval.
19
SECTION VIII
WATER. KANAG;','~ENT R~QUIR-~MENTS
The purpose of this section is to
stipulations established by the Watsr Manage=ant A~visox-y
~oerd, which shall bm accommodated by '~'J.e proJec=
developer.
1. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans
shall be submitted to County Project Review Se~lcas
for review. No cons=~c=ion pe~i=a shall be issued
unless and until approval of ~ha pro~sed
const~ction in accordance with the s~mi=~ed plans
is gram=ed by County ProJec~ Review Sa~lces.
2. Contraction of all water management facilities
shall be s~Ject to compliance wi~ ~a appropriate
provisions of ~a Collier "CountM
Repletions.
~ Excavation ;e~i~ will Me re~ire4 for ~e
proposed retention area in acco~anca wl~ CollAer
County Ordinance No. S~-26 and S~D ~lea. -
4. ~e to ~e mixed land use wi~in ~he project, a
ma~ter association will be foxed. The mas=er
association has ultimate re~pons~ili~y for
operation and maintenance of ~he drainage facill%ies
wi~in the project.
5. A copy of S~D Pa~lt or Early Work ~e~lt
ra~ired prior ~o conat~ction plan approval.
6. A 20' maintenance easement shall be pr~lded around
the entire perimeter of ~e lake and a 20' access
easement ~hall ~e provided.
2O
The lake and wetland locations do not
ninimu~ 200' separation criteria of ~he So~h
Florida Water ~anaganent District rules, l~rovide
appropriate calais=ions, consis=e~t wl~ Sou~
Florida ~=er ~nagemen= Ols=ric= ~les =o allow
reduc=ion ~ ~is d~ension. Xf, aa a ~= of
changes caused by ~he Sou~ Florida Wa~er ~ag~en~
Dls=ric~ Pe~lt retirements, ~a'si~e pl~
s~s~an=ially,' ~la project shall be re~i~ ~o
back ~o ~he Wa~er HanagenenC Adv~so~ ~rd
possibly =he Collier Councy.Pla~ing'~o=ission and
~ard of County Co~lssi~nars : if. de~e~lned
necessa~.
'-. O
21
!
2
3
¢
6
?
9
lo
15
16
1'7
19
20
30
32
3~
36
37
39
4o
42
44
RESOLUTION 97-
A I~'.ESO%.IJ'TION BY 'I'%,~E ~ OF COUNTY
COK~IS$IONERS OF CO~I~
~DA, P~SU~ ~ SE~ION 2.7.3.
D~PM~ ~DE AFFE~ING O~I~CE
90-6 ~0~ AS N~POLIT~ P~
E~DING
~ 18, 1999;
EFFE~IVE DATE.
~I~E~A$, the NEAPOLITAN PARK PUD, Ordinance 90-6 adopted on
January 23, 1990, is subject to the provisions of Section
2.7.3.4., of the Land Development Code (LOC), Time Limits for
Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective
Master Plans; and
WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for two
years, until March 18, 1999; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
Appeels of Collier County, Florida that:
1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
as if fully set forth herein.
2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to March 18, 1999;
at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
which the extension is granted.
-1-
WkR 1 8 1997
This Resolution adopted after Lotion, second and majority
2 vote.
3 Dona this day of
4
S
&
7
9
],0
12
14
l&
19
20
21
22
:24
. , 1997.
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~}~ISSIONERS
COLLIF--R COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. ~ANCOCK, CHAIRRA/4
APPROVF~) AS TO FORH AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
MARJORIE )4. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTOR/4EY
--2--
STAFF R~VIEW AND RECfkMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 91-88,
A/~SO KNOWN AS THE VINCENTIAN RESIDENCE PUD, WHICH, A~CORDING TO
THE REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY
OWNER/AGENT, HAS NOT COMMENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN
SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPM~.NT CODE,
RESULTING IN SEVERAL POSSIBLE COURSES 'OF ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF
CO~3NTY CO~MISSIONERS TO CONSIDER.
OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff's
findings and recommendations regarding the above referenced PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on September
16, 1991. Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Developmen~
Code requires that the project developer submit an annual report
on the progress of development, commencing on the fifth
anniversary of the PUD approval by the Board of County
Commissioners. The singular purpose of this report is to evaluate
whether or not the project has commenced in earnest in accordance
with the criteria set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs
approved prior to the effective date of adoption of the Land
Development Code, the five year approval period commenced on the
adoption date, October 30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set
forth in Section 2.7.3.4. are aF !icable as of October 30, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which
was approved prior to October 30, 1991 and which has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4. Staff has
utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report,
supplemented by field observation and review of in house records
to verify the current status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided
in Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2.7.3.4.
Time limits for approved PUD master plans. In the event
that a PUD master plan is given approval, and the
landowner(s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a
development order for all infrastructure improvements
to include utilities, roads and similar improvements
required by the approved PUD master plan or other
development orders for at least 15 percent of the gross
land area of the PUD site every five years of the date
of approval by the Board of County Commissi.~'nu&{G£~[M~
-1-
MAR 1 8 1997
Fail to receive final local developm&nt orders for at
least 15 percent of the total number of approved
dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case of PUDs
consisting of nonresid~ntiai uses, 30 percent of the
total approved gross leasable floor area within the PUD
every six years of the date of approval by the Board of
County Co.~ ssioners.
The project developer shall submit to the Planning
Services Director a status report on the progress of
development annually commencing on the fifth
anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County Commissioners. The singular purpose of the
report will b~ to evaluate whether or not the project
has commenced in earnest in accordance with the
criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Services Director determ/ne that
the development has commenced in earnest, then the land
shall retain its existing PUD approval and shall not be
subject to additional review and consideration of new
development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has not commenced in earnest, then upon
review and consideration of the report provided by the
owner and any supplemental information that may be
provided, the Board of County Co...issioners shall elect
one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period
of two years; at the end of which time, the owner will
again submit to the procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be
consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The
existing PUD shall remain in effect until subsequent
action by the board of the submitted amendment of the
PUD.
If the owner fails to su~it an amended PUD within six
months of Board action to require such an amended
su~ittal, then the Board may initiate proceedings to
rezone the unimproved portions of the orig:.nai PUD to
an appropriate zoning classification cons..ste~r~o.£~
MAR 1 8 1997
-2- P~. _ ~
the FUture Land Use Element of the Growth Management
Plan.
In the case of deFelopments of regional impact, time
limit restrictions shall be superseded by the phasing
plan and/or time limits contained within the
application for deFelo~ment a~roFal and a~roved as
~rt of a development order in conformance with F.$. ]
380.06. '
S~nop~i. of Approved Land Uses:
This PUD was approved for 30 residential units for the elderly on
a 10 acre parcel; a school, a church and related facilities on
another 10 acre parcel. And another 10 acre parcel to be used for
children's home, residence for unwed mothers, family enrichment
Center, special education center, etc. This PUD contains 30.7
acres.
Consisten~ with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan:
The subject PUD is designated Urban Coastal Fringe on the Future
Land Use Element of the GMP. Urban Coastal Fringe district allows
residential developments with a base density.of 3 units per acre.
This district also allows a host of non-residential uses such as
churches, schools, etc., provided certain criteria are met.
Based on staff review of the approved land uses, the PUD has been
determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan. The PUD has also been found to be consistent
with the following GMP Elements FLUE; Traffic Circulation
Element; Open Space/Natural Resource Element.
Consistency with the Collier County Land Develo~-.ent Code :
The PUD has been distributed to the appropriate jurisdiction
review entities specifically for review of the PUD for
consistency with current land development regulations. Based on
that review, the following inconsistencies have been identified:
Transportation: (Traffic impacts, access management, etc.)
This PUD will be required to adhere to the provisions of the LDC,
including the Access management Plan.
Landscape: (Buffers/Green Space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
IMAR!81997
I ,.._,/
~nvironm~ntal: (Protected species, green/open space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Engineering/Site Development: (Sewer/water, drainage issues)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Planning:
This project does not provide any size criteria or other
development standards for the church, school, special education
center, etc.. It is not possible to evaluate the real impact of
this PUD by the size of the parcel only. It is staff's opinion
that this PUD should be amended to provide all necessary criteria
and development standards for this development.
~ite__~_~_~cific Conditions of Approval~
Staff recommendations relative to each condition of the original
rezone approval are listed below:
Conditions of Approval: The developer shall improve Southwest
Boulevard along their property to minor collector standards.
Staff Recommendation: This condition of approval is
appropriate and necessary to accommodate the additional traffic
caused by the development of this project.
FISCAL IMPACT: A two year extension of this PUD Ordinance will
have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
NOTE: This PUD was originally approved in 1984 with a density of
--8 dwelling units per acre. In 1991, as a result of the ZRO
(Zoning Re-evaluation Ordinance) process, the applicant was
required to amend the PUD to reduce the density to 3 units
per acre, consistent with the Future Land Use Element of
the Growth Management Plan. The PUD was amended on
September 16, 1991.
STAFF RECOt4~ENDATION:
Based on a comprehensive review of this PUD document,
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners require the
property owner to amend this PUD within six months.
MAR 1 8 1997 .
-4-
PREPARED BY:
CHARRAM BADAMTCHIAN, Ph.D. , AICP
DATE
R~VIEW~D BY:
RObeRT J. MULHERE, AICP
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
DATE
/,SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
-5-
!
:2
4
8
9
*~o
11
],4
P~ESOLUTION 97-
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIOWERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE
91-88 FSNOWN ~ VINCENTIAN RESIDENCES
PUD, EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD
APPROVAL TO M~_%CH 18, 1999; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
15 WHEREAS, the Vincentian Residences PUD, Ordinance 91-68
16 adopted on September 16, 1991, is subject to the provisions of
17 Section 2.7.3.4., of the Land Development Code (LDC), Time Limits
18 for Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective
19 Master Plans; and
20 WHEREA~, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
21 provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and
2~ WHEREAS, the Board of Ccunty Commission~r~ has reviewed the
23 PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for two
24 years, until March 18, 1999; and
25 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
26 Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
27
2a 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
29 as if fully set forth herein.
31 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
32 compliance with the review requirements of Section
33 2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
34
35 3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current
36 PUD approval is hereby extended to March 18, 1999;
37 at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
38 the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4.
39 This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
40 approval.
41 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
42 the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
43 which the extension is granted.
-1-
MAR 1 8 1997
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority
vote.
Done this day of , 1997.
4
&
?
10
Il
14
17
18
21
2S
26
BOARD OF COUNTY CC~I$$IONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
D~IGHT Z. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. DLA/qCOCK, CHAII~N
APPROVED AS TO F0~ AND LEC.~/, SUFFICIENCY:
~aohtz ~.
...... ORDINANCE 91- 8.__8 //
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
82-2, THE CO:~PREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS
FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER ".?-.,
..... ~.~ .... ~'
COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL .... ' ~ **
ZONING ATLAS MAP NI~MBER 0632N; BY CHANGING '
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN
DESCRIBED PEAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO
"PUD", PL3C~NEDUNIT DEVELOPMENT, K~OWN AS
VINCENTiAN RESIDENCE PUD, FOR A MIXED USE
COMPLEX (MIXED USES INCLUDING PESIDENTIAL,
INSTITUTIONAL CAPd~, AND COMMUNITY
FACILITY), FOR PROPERTY IDCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF US-41 EAST AND ON THE EAST
SIDE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD, LYING IN
SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUI~{, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF 30.7 AC~ES; A~D BY PROVIDIN~ AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
W~EREAS, the residential portion of the Vincentian
Residence Planned Unit Development (PUD), which ~ermits 80
dwelling units at a density of 8 units per acre, has been
to be inconsistent with the Density Rating System contained in
the Future Land Use Element of the Grow~ch Management Plan;
W}FEREAS, the Collier County Growth Planning Department
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the
zoning classification of the herein described real property to
be consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Grow~ch '.
Management Plan;
*NOW ~HEREFORE BE IT*ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COM~ISSIONERS OF COLLIER CO~4TY, FLORIDA;
SECTION ONE:
The Zoning Classification of the herein aescribed real
property located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD",
Planned Unit Development, in accordance with the PUD document
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein and
by reference made part hereof. The official Zoning Atlas Map
Number 0632N,as described in Ordinance Number 82-2, is hereby
amended accordingly.
- (
SECTION T~O~
Ordinance Number 85-27, known as tha Vlncantian Residence
PUD, adopted on June 18, 1985 by the Board of County
Comnissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby repealed in
its entirety.
This ordinance sh~ll become effective upon receipt of
notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been
filed with the Secretary of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County
'Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 16 day of
-~~, 1991.
' "'}~3 ~,~/
'.. _%.,,? ... · /)/* .;
· { . . .A~TEST: . .'..(%'
· - ~ ' . A · .% .~.~. '~ . ~ ·
,~ · ~ · ~ ~ ~'.. , . ~ . ~...
?'~'. '~. ' ...... ~'~ ~ ..~i~
rl,Appr~= as to fo~ and
' } l'~gal ',ufftcten~
Assistant County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
V~NCENTIAN RESIDENCE OP~
VINCENTIAN RESIDENCE PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTARTS
ARCHITECT:
F~IO L~NDO~, A.I.A.
2335 TA/~IA/~I ~RAIL N.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940
T--'L. (813) 262-478E
ENGINEER:
BRUNS AND BRUNS, INC.
529 TMIRD STREET SOUTH
NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940
TEL. (813) 261-5965
PLARNING CONSULTANT:
DR. NENO J. SPAGNA, PRESIDENT
FLORIDA URBAR INSTITUTE, INC.
3850 27TH AVE. S.W.
NAPLES, FLOR/DA 33999
TEL. (813) 455-2168
PR~P~.R~D FOR
EDWA~RD A. MCC~.RTHY, ARCHBISHOP
OF THE DIOCESE OF ~tIA2~I
MIAMI, FLORIDA
REVISED FOR
JOHN J. NEVINS, BISHOP
'OF THE DIOCESE OF VENICE
.VENICE, FLORIDA
APRIL, 1984
RA'VISED SEPTEMBER, 1984
SECOND REVISION MAY, 1985
R~EVISED SEPTF..MBER 16, 1991 BY THE
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................
SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION ..... 1.
1.1 PURPOSE ................... 1.
1.2 T.~GAL DESCRIPTION .............. 1.
1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP ............. 1.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY .......
1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION ............ 1.
SECTION II PROJECT DE};ELOPMENT ............ 4.
2.1 PURPOSE ................... 4.
2.2 GENERAL ................... 4.
2.3 SITE PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS ........ 4.
SECTION III WATER MANAGEMENT ............. 6
SECTION IV LAND USE R~GULATIONS .........
4.1 INTENDED USES ..............
4.2 PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES
4.3 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES
%.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ............
SECTION V STATEMEHT OF COMPLIANCE .......... 10
SECTION VI DEVELOPM]ENT COMMITh'ENTS ......... 11
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2. SITE PLA2I ................. 5
FIGURE 3. PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE ......... 7
SECTION
PROPERTY O~ERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION
The purpose'of this section is to identify the location
and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing
conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the
name of VINCENTI~ R~RIDENCE.
1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Commencing at the concrete monument marking the East
corner of Section 32, ~ownship 50 South, Range 26 £ast, Collier
County, Florida, this monument being the Point of Beginning;
thence North 02'47'30" East along the Easterly boundary of said
Section 32 a distance of 885.11 feet to the Southerly
right-of-way line of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail), said right-of-way
line being a curve; thence along said right-of-way line an
distance of 819.59 feet, maid curve concavs to the Northeast,
'.having a central angle of 14'35'08", radius 3219.55 feet, chord
distance 817.38 feet and chord bearing of North 46'21'34" West
to the point of tangency; thence continue along said
right-of-way line North 39'04~00" West 73.64 feet to the
Easterly right-of-way line of Southwest Boulevard which is the
Easterly boundary of Trail Acres subdivision as recorded in
Plat Book 3, Page 50 of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida; thence along said right-of-way line and said boundary
South 50'56'00" Wast 1007.99 Feet to the Northeasterly boundary
of Trail Acres Unit 3 as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 94 of
the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence
Southeasterly along said Northeasterly boundary of said Plat
South 39'05'25" East 1081.97 feet; thence Easterly along the
North boundary of said Plat South 87'30'12" East 695.91 feet to
the Point of Beginning. Said parcel containing 30.7 acres more
or .less.-See Figure 1.
1.3.. P~OPERTY 'OWN~_RSHIP
'. · '.~The property encompassing this PUD is under the ownership.
Of'John J. Nevins, P.O. Box 2006, Venice, Florida.
1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
A. The property consists of 30.7 acres of land, more or
'"less, generally located on the south side of U.S. 41
between Southwest Boulevard and tile Nitching Post
Mobile Hone Park. Ingres~ and egress will be from
Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41. The land is
presently vacant and covered by native vegetation.
B. The current zoning of the subject property is PUD,
Planned Unit Development.
C. The Growth Management Plan designates the subject
property as within the Urban Coastal Fringe Area.
1.5. ~MYSICAb DESCRIPTIO~
A. The elevation of the project site varies from 4.5 to
5.7 feet with an average elevation of approximately
5.1 feet, see Figure 1.
identified on the Federal Insurance Rate Nap. Zone
8A is defined as ,,Areas of 100-year flood: base flood
elevations and flood hazard factors no~ determined-"
~ike all properties in collier County, it is eligible.
for insurance under the National Flood Insurance
Program.
A description of the soil types found in the project
area - Leighty classifies the project soils as Arzell
Fine Sands (Aa5). This soil group is characterized
as deep beds of fine loose sand with almost no
organic matter; slightly acid or neutral.
The depth of rock varies from 48 inches to 80 inches.
Relief is nearly level or slightly depressional.
Surface runoff is very slow or ponded.
Internal drainage ia rapid when freed of high water
table.
Seasonable high water table varies from one to two
feet with a duration time depending on rainfall
periods, amount of rainfall and the wet-dr~ seasons
cycle.
There are no limitations to the degree and kind of
low building structured.
:
%
%
."
SECTIO~ II
PROJECT ~EYELOPHENT
2.1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this section is to delineate and generally
describe the project plan of development, the respective
land uses of the Parcels included in the project, as well
as the project criteria for VINCENTIM! RESIDENCE.
A. Regulations for development of VINCENTIAN RESIDENCE
shall be in accordance with the contents of this
document, PUD-Planned Unit Development District and
other applicable sections and parts of the "Collier
County Zoning Ordinance."
B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms
shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the
"Collier County Zoning ordinance."
2.3 SITE PLA~ AND LAND USE TRACTS
A. The site plan, including layout of streets and land
use of various parcels, is illustrated graphically by
Figure 2.
.There Shall be three (3) land use parcels, plus
necessary street rights-of-way, sewage treatment
. plant, lake and appropriate landscaping, the
configuration of which is also illustrated as
(1) ~" Parcel A: ~aximum of 30 residential units for
'~!~]~"~;:.' ...... ; '' flexibility to locate some of these '.
....::. If Parcel B and/or Parcel C are used
· : .-. ' for housing, additional units shall be
· -.' .~ calculated using the density of 3
units per acre for the additional land
allocated for this.use.
(~ 10.0 acres)
(2) Parcel B: Parcel B is intended for future
development for a school, church,
rectory and related uses.
(± 10.0 acres)
(3) Parcel C: Parcel C is intended for future
development of institutional care
facilities such as, but not limited to
children's home, residence for unwed
mothers, family enrichment center,
special educational center, etc.
(± 10.0 acres)
~OTAL ACREAGE (± 30.7 acres)
3.1
3.2
SECTION III
WATER ~LANAG EMENT
It is estimated that the final developed site will consist
of nine acres of impez-vious area, four acres of lake, two
acres for sewage treatment facility, and 15 acres of open
area.
Originally this land was drained by sheet flow to the
south. Due to development on west, south and east the
water restricted from its natural flow. It appears that
the best way to handle the stox-m water is to route it to
the lake and then provide an overflow out to the east
boundary which is a Section line. When the detailed
drainage design is completed the water can be routed to
the north or south, whichever is best. See Figure 3.
The petitioner agrees to the following water management
stipulations:
A. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to
the County Engineer for review. No construction
permits shall be issued unless and until approval of
the proposed construction in accordance with the
submitted plans is granted by the County Engineer.
B. Revisions shall be made to the size of the retention
lake and design of the outlet control structure to
limit off-site discharge to 0.33 cfs/acre.
C. Unless a legal outfall can be established through
adjacent farm property to the south, off-site
discharge shall be restricted only to the US-41 road
i%n Excavation Permit will be required for the
proposed lake in accordance with Collier County
'. Ordinance 88-26, as amended.
E. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to
'the County Engineer for review.. No Construction
permits shall be issued unless and until approval of
the proposed construction in accordance with the
'submitted plans is granted by the County Engineer.
Distance between principal structures: Fifteen (15)
feet.
Signs - As permitted or required by the Collier
County Sign Ordinance in effect at the time a permit
is reques:ed.
Minimum off-street parking and off-street loading -
as permitted or required by the Zoning Ordinance in
effect at the time a permit is requested.
Hlnimum landscaping requirements - as permitted or
required by the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the
time I per. it is requested.
S~te Development Plan approval in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance shall be received prior to any
development.
SECTION V
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
5.1
5.2
The project
US-41.
The petitioner states that if he proceeds with the
development, he will:
A. Provide agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, or
sureties acceptable to the County for completion of
the undertaking in accord with the adopted Master
Plan as well as for continuing operation and
'maintenance of such areas, functions and
facilities that are not to be provided, operated or
maintained at general public expense; and,
B. Bind his successors in title to any commitments made
under "A." preceding.
The Vincentian Residence Planned Unit Development is
consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan
for the following reasons:
A. The project site is designated Urban Coastal Fringe,
and is within the Traffic Congestion Area, as
designated on the Future Land Use Map and in the
1~/ture Land Use Element. Interconnection with
adjacent properties is not appropriate. The
Permitted uses in this PUD are permitted in the Urban
Coastal Fringe and the density of 3 units per acre
conforms to the Density Rating System contained in
the Future Land Use Element.
The proJ~c~ will be served by central water and sewer
facilities.
..The project is compatible with surrounding land uses.
...The p~o'Jec't will comply with all applicable County,
State and Federal laws regulating development of the
will be limited to one access point onto
SECTION VI
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
6.1 Environmental Advisory Council - The EAC met on
February 6, 1985 and reco=mended approval of Petition
R-84-11C (the original rezone petition to PUD) subject to
the following conditions which are acceptable to the
petitioner:
A. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the
Project Review Services Environmental Staff for their
review and approval prior to any substantial work on
the site. This plan may be submitted in phases to
coincide with the development schedule. The site
clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site
layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the
maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings,
lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been
. . oriented to accommodate this goal.
B. Native species shall be utilized, where available, to
the maximum extent possible in the site landscaping
design. A landscaping plan will be submitted to the
Project Review Serwices Environmental Staff for their
review and approval. This plan will depict the
incorporation of native species and their mix with
other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping
shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and
habitat characteristics lost on the site during
construction or due to past activities.
C. Ali exotic plants, as defined in the County Code,
shall be removed during each phase of construction
from development areas, open space areas, and
preserve areas. Following site development a
maintenance program shall be implemented to prevent
reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This
plan, which will'describe control techniques and
inspection intervals, shall be filed with and
approved by the Project Review Services Environmental'
Staff.
D. If during the course of site clearing, excavation, or
other constructional activities, an archaeological or
historical site, artifact, or other indicator is
discovered, all development at that location shall be
immediately stopped and the Project Review
Serwices Environmental Staff notified. Development
will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to
enable the Project Review SeTvices Environmental
Staff or a designated consultant to access the find
and determine the proper course of action in regard
to its sal%ageability.. The Project Review
Services Environmental Staff will respond to any such
notification in a timely and efficient manner so as
to provide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities.
E. Maintain to the maximum extent possible the natural
vegetation in the 25 foot buffer along US-41.
6.2 Water Management Advisory Board - The ~4AB met on
April 10, 1985 and recommended approval of Petition
R-84-11C (the original rezone petition to PUD) subject to
the following conditions which are acceptable to the
petitioner: '-. ?~--~.-.... .. .-~ ../.'-.'.'-~".'~ '.'-'-'-
6.3
6.4
A. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitt, ! to
the County £ngineer for his review. No construction
permits shall be issued unless and until approval of
the proposed construcCion in accordance with the
sub~itted plans is gran=ed by the County £ng~neer.
B. Rev£sions shall be made to the size of the retention
lake and design of the outlet control structure to
limi~ off-site discharge to 0.33 cfs/acre.
C. Unless a legal outfall can be established through
adjacent farm proger=y ~o the south off-site
discharge sh~ll be restricted only to the US-el road
swals.
D. An £xcavation Permit will be required for the
proposed lake in a¢¢¢rd&nce with Collier County
Ordinance 88-26, as amended.
Traffic £ngineer -
A. Subject to FDOT approYal, the petitioner shall
provide the following:
(1) No nedian shall be permitted for a westbound
left turn off of US-¢1.
(2) An eastbound right turn deceleration lane on
US-41 at South~es~ ~oulevard.
(3) Arterial level street lighting at the project
entrance.
(4) Sidewalk and/or bike path improvements along
property frontage as required by County.
(5) Westbound left turn lane on US-41 at Southwest
Blvd.
The'development shall have positive drainage outfall
for excessive runoff as required by the County.
The developer ~hall improve Southwest Boulevard along'
their ~roperty to minor collector standards as set
.- "forth in the ~ubdivision Regulations.
County Utll~ties Services Division -
A. This PUD is subject to the conditions outlined by ~r.
· John F. MadaJewski in hie memorandum to Missy Ober
dated May 14, 1985, attached.
.... VINPUD?.2291
MEMORANDUM
DATE w~:. ~.
Re: , ~eCition ~-S&-llC, Vincenclln FUO (Supercade~ stipuletionl coutaIna~
in =eno dated April 25,
~e have reviewed the above re~erencsd ~et~tion end have no obJeccto~ to
the rezone as requested. N~ever, we requ~re the fail.tn
sCipulac[ous as a condition to our rec~end&cion for approval:
A) Vacer i
1) Vicar dia~rlbution and sevale collection and
systems will .be cons~cted throughout the pto~sct developer
,. developer pursuant to all current requiresents ut Collier Coeur7
'..".s~.'be conveyed . to 'the :Dusty for ~tsbtp~ eperat~
· ~nteu~nce ~u~oses. ~ ~te: and saver fac~ttes c~st~cttd
private, ptopett7 and not required ~y t~t C~nt7 t~ be lb:aced
utility easeeents shall be ~ed, operated a~ ~intained ~ the
Developer~ his assigns or successors. Upon co~letion oI
og the water and sever lacilities within the prolect, the
be tested to Insure they ~eet Collier Countyt~ ~n~ :equire~nts at
v~tch tine they will be conveyed or transgerred to the County,
required by the Utilities Division, pursuant to appropriate County
Ordinances and Re~ul~tions in e~ecC at the ti~s conveyance or trans~er
is requested, prior to betnj placed i~to
2) ~1 construction plans and technical specifications ~nd
plats, if applicable, ~or the proposed ~ater distribution and
con,action and tran~aission ~aci~lties Just be reviewed and approved
:he Utilities Division prior to co~enceaent o~
3) All cue:Deers consortia8 to the water distribution and sevaje
collection facilities viii be custoaera oI the County and viii be billed
by t~e County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should
the County no: be In a position to provide water and/or sever se~lce to
the project, the water and/or sever cuscoaers shall be custouers DE the
interia utility established to serve the project until the County's
DEl-site ~acer and/or se~er ~ac~lities ate available to se~e the
project.
&) It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division viii ulti=tately
supply potable water to meet tha consumptive de~and and/or receive and
trait the ievaga [snerated by this project. Should'the .Count7 system
not be in a position to supply potable water to the project and/or
reciive the project's vastewater at:the;time ge~elo~nt 'co.encee, the
Developer, at his expense, vil1 ins{~ll'~nd ePerat~~t~ supply
and on-liCe treatment .facilities ~nd/o~'~',
..... . ...... ..- .:, '... '... '...
. ..._:..: .............. . :. .:.
To: Ann HcKl,~. Plennin$ Dept.
~) Am Asreenent s~all be entered ~nCo be~vaen che County and the
Developer, bindin~ on ~be Developer, his assigns or successors, lesally
acceptable ~o ~he County. prior ~o the approval of eoms~c~lom ~o~menzs
~or ~he proposed project, a~a~n~ tha~:
a) ~e proposed wa~er supply and ou-sl~a tread=est ~aail~es
ou-si~a was~ewa~er ~rea~em~ an~ disposal ~aeili~ian, ~f required, are
be cous~c~ed aa par~ o~ ~he proposed proJec~ and ~s~ ~ rtgarded
inUe~; they s~ll be cous~c~ad ~o S~a~e ~d Fe~e~al s~andards
a~e ~o be o~ed, opera~e~ and ~lu~ained by the ~er~ ~s assl~s or
successors uu~il auc~ ~e as ~he County's off-siva wa~er faeili~Xes
and/or o~-si~e sever fac~l~ies are available ~o se~ica the proJec~.
..... .b) Upon conn,c~iou ~o ~be County's o~-si~e wa~er facilities,
· sewer faclli~ies~ ~be Developer, ~ia assigns or auccessars a~ll abandon
· dis~n~le' and re~va from the si~e .~he iu~er~ wa~er and/or se~ge
. "~rea~nen~ facility and discon~ue ~ne o~ ~he wa~er supply
',applicable, ~ a ~nmer consis~eu~ wl~b ~a~e of Florida s~andards,
~1 work ~ela~e~ ~h ~his ac~lv~y shall be per~o~ad a~ no cos~ to the
· County.
' c) Connection ~o the County's ogf-slKe wa~er end,or ne~er
~11 be ~de by the o~ers, ~beir assigns or successors a~ no cos~ to
Coum~y within 90 days ag~er such ~acili~es b~co=e available.
of connection shall include, bu~ no~ be l~i~ed to~ all
desl~ an~ preparation of ~ons~c~lon documents, pelleting, ~di~l~a-
Cion or rafi~cing o~ sevage pucpln~ facll~cies, ~n~erconnec~lou
Couuuy o~-si~e facilities, wa~er author sewer lines necessary ~o ~e
~he conmec~iom(s), e~c.
d) A~ ~he C~me County o~f-nice water and/or se~er [acllicies are
'ava~laBle for the proJec~ ~o conmec~ with, ~he following va~er and/or
sever faciliKles shall be conveynd ~o the County purauanK to a~propria~a
County Ordinances and ~e~ulac~on$ in e[fec~ ac ~he
1) All ~a~er and/or aec*er facili~iea coma~ructed In ~ublicly
o~ed rights-of-way or within u~lli~y easements required by
fac[li~ies required ~o make conmecKiom vl~h the Coun~y'n
o[[-si~a water and/or sever faclli~ies; or,
2) Ail wa~er and sever faclllKles required C~ conncc~ the
proJec~ Co the County'n off-site water and/or sewer
~hen t~e on-~te valet and/or'~ever'.-[ac~ltt~e~'~te contracted
on private property and 'not'required by tKe,-Count~ to
'fo: Ann ~c~.~-~4 l'lar, ntnI De~art=ent
i) ~ln s~v~ts linc ~cition ~n4 ~orce ~in inc~r-
co~ecclu[ ~ch Cie County si~r facillcils ~cludin[
~scer racer ~ecer se~ln~ ch~ project, lncludin~
e) ~e customers se~ed on au incezh basis by the utility sysc~
consC~cced b~ ch. Developer shall becks cusco:ers o~ ch. ~uucy ac
c~e when County o~-sice varec and/or seve~ facilities art avlihble
ee~e ch. project iud s~ch co~ecciou is Md.. Prior co conuecci~
· ' ch. p~oJecc co ch. ~uncy'l oil-siC, racer and/uT sever facilities
;..' Developer, his flSilns, or successors I~ll cu~ oYir co Ch. ~cy
~'. couplers list o[ the customers le~ed by ch. interim utilities system
'-; ~e Developer a~ll also p~ovidt the County with a derailed ~v~nco~
'the Iacilici~s se~ed vlc~ the project and the en~lCy ~l~ ~1 bt
responsible for the vicar and/or sever se.ice blllin~ for Chi project,
' f) All' :~o~s~uc~loa plans ant technical specifications related to
connections Co the County's off-siCs racer and/or sewer facilities
be submitted Co the Utilities Division for rsviev and approval prior to
co~ence~enc o~ consC~ction.
1) ~ht Developer, his stalin, or successors altec co pay all system
development charles ac the Cl~e chac lulldinl PaniCs are requited,
pursuant co appropriate County ~d~ances and lelulacions In effect
cbt cl~e o~ Pe~lc request. ~[s requirement s~ll be Mdc ~ Co
prospective buyers-o~ properties ~or which buildinl pe~cs will be
'required prior co ch. scare ol bulldin[ construction.
h) ~he County ac ice option may lease for ope~a~lon and ~incenance Ch.
vicar distribution and/or se'~ate collection ~nd transmission system
Ch. project Developer or his asslins [or the sun o[ $10.00 per year.
o[ the lease shall be dece~ined upon completion of ~he proposed
construction and prior co activation o[ ~he racer supply, treatment and
distribution facilities and/or Cbs aevaSe collection, crans~ission and
treatment [aclllCies. The Lease, il rtqulred, shall renain In effect
until ch. County can provide racer and/or siver semite chr~[h
off-sic, lacllicies or until such clot Char bulk race racer and/or sever
B) Dace rtquired under County Ordinance .N~ ".~O-ll2'.'~hovini thc avail-
ability of .evils ' service, 'must be su~ cced:~a~ae~'~. ,.. j.he ·
.... Cbs . roJecc..~f,Subnic :a ;copy. of ;che ~pp~ DER~pe~
Page
C) If an iuCar~ oa-a~ca rater supply, trea~uenC and crans-.L~ss~n
facility is uC~l~zt~ Co ae~e the proposed project, ic mac be p~per~y
,~zed co supply average and peak day d~esc~c d~nd, ~ addition co f~re
~lov deMnd aC a race approved by the app~priace Fire ~ucrol D~scricc
~) ~t ~L~ doc~uC aha~l bt ravLsed co
stLpulacio~s conceded here~n. A r~Loed copy of the ~ doc~tuC ~sc
~ sub~Cce~ co Ch~ Oc~l~ctea D~vision ~or ~tv~tv and approval prior Co
schedu~tn~ the ?echelon for consideratXon bY
.0
STAFF REVIEW ARD REC(IMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 91-31,
ALSO KNOWN AS THE WATERFORD ESTATES PUD, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQ(3IRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER/A~ENT,
HAS NOT C(~4MENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF
THE COLLIER C~JNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, RESULTING IN SEVERAL
POSSIBLE C(~JRSES OF ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO~%4ISSIONERS
TO CONSIDER.
OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff's
findings and recommendations regarding the above referenced PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on April 9,
1991. Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code
requires that the project developer submit an annual report on
the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary
of the PUD approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The
singular purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not the
project has commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria
set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs approved prior to
the effective date of adoption of the Land Development Code, the
five year approval period commenced on the adoption date, October
30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set forth in Section
2.7.3.4. are applicable as of October 30, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which
was approved prior to October 30, 1991 and which has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4. Staff has
utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report,
supplemented by field observation and review of in house records
to verify the current status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided
in Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2.7.3.4.
Time limits for approved PUD master plans. In the event
that a PUD master plan is given approval, and the
landowner (s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a
development order for all infrastructure improvements
to include utilities, roads and similar improvements
required by the approved PUD master plan or other
development orders for at least 15 percent of the gross
land area of the PUD site every fife years of the date
of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; and
1 8 1997
IJAR 18~
me
Fail to receive final local development orders for at
least 15 percent of the total number of approved
dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case of PUDs
consisting of nonresidential uses, 30 percent of the
total approved gross leasable floor area within the PUD
every s/x years of the date of approval by the Board of
County Commissioners.
The project developer shall submit to the Planning
Services Director a status report on the progress of
development annually commencing on the fifth
anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County Commissioners. The singular purpose of the
report will be to evaluate whether or not the project
has commenced in earnest in accordance with the
criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has commenced in earnest, then the land
shall retain its existing PUD approval and shall not be
subject to additional review and consideration of new
development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has not commenced in earnest, then upon
review and consideration of the report provided by the
owner and any supplemental information that may be
provided, the Board of County Commissioners shall elect
one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period
of two years,, at the end of which time, the owner will
again submit to the procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be
consis ten t wi th the Growth Management Plan. The
existing PUD shall remain in effect until subsequemt
action by the board of the submitted amendment of the
PUD.
If the owner fails to submit an amended PUD
months of Board action to require such
su_h~_ittal, then the Board may initiate
rezone the unimproved portions of the original
an appropriate zoning classification
-2-
the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management
Plan.
In the case of developments of regional impact, time
limit restrictions shall be superseded by the phasing
plan and/or time limi ts con tained wi thin the
apPlication for development approFal and apProFed as
part of a development order in confoxmance with F.$. ]
380.06.
This PUD was approved for 63 sing/e-family residentia! dwelling
units. The gross density for this PUD is 3.25 units per acre.
This PUD contains 30.7 acres.
C°nsiste~wi~ehensive Growth Management Plan:
The subject PUD is designated Urban residential on the Future
Land Use Element of the GMP. A base density of 4 units per acre
may be permitted within the Urban residential district. Based on
staff review of the approved land uses, the PUD has been
determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth
Management Plan. The PUD hus also been found to be consistent
with the following G~4P Elements FLUE~ Traffic Circulation
Element~ Open Space/Natural Resource Element.
Consisten_cywith the Collier Count_~Land Devel~ent Code :
The PUD has been distributed to the appropriate Jurisdiction
review entities specifically for review of the PUD for
consistency with current land development regulations. Based on
that review, the following inconsistencies have been identified:
Transportation: (Traffic impacts, access management, etc.}
This PUD will be required to adhere to the provisions of the LDC,
including the Access management Plan.
Landscape: (Buffers/Green Space}
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Environmental: (Protected species, green/open space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Engineering/Site Development: (Sewer/water, drainage issues)
-3- Ig .R 1 8 1997
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
FISCAL IMPACT: A two year extension of this PUD
have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
Ordinance will
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on a comprehensfve review of this PUD document,
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant a two
year extension of this PUD.
PRE P~RED BY:
CHAHRA~ BAD~TCHI~4q, Ph.D. , AICP
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
CURRENT FLANNING MANAGER
DATE
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP - --
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
VINCENT.A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
-4-
NAR 18 1997
1
2
3
4
s
6
?
9
1/.
12
13
14
],5
RESOLUTION 97-
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOA/~D OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PURSUanT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY IdtND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE
91-31 KNOWN A~ WATERFORD ESTATES PUD,
EXTENDING THE CLT~NT PUD APPROVA.L TO
P~CH 18, 1999; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE·
16 WHEREAS, the Waterford Estates PUD, Ordinance 91-31 adopted
i? on April 9, 1991, is subject to the provisions of Section
18 2.7.3.4·, of the Land D~velopment C.~e [LDC), Time Limits for
19 Approved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective .
20 Master Plans; and
21 WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
22 provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and
23 WHERE,, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
24 PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for two
25 years, until March 18, 1999;
2& NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ~ESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
27 Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
29 1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
3o as if fully set forth herein.
31
32 2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
33 compliance with the review requirements of Section
34 2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
35
38 3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current
37 PUD approval is hereby extended to March 18, 1999;
3s at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
39 the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3·4.
40 This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
41 approval.
42 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
43 the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
44 which the extension is granted.
MAR 1
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority
vote.
4
$
6
?
9
10
1],
13
].4
15
17
2O
:'1
:22
24
25
Done this day of , 1997.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
MA~JO~IE M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
-2-
O~D~NANC£ 9~-
~ ORDINANCE AMENDING O~DINA~CE
82-2 T~E COMPR~S~V~ ZONinG
FOR THE ~ZNCO~TED ~ OF COLLIER
CO~TY, F~RIDA, BY ~D~NG ~E OFFICIAL
ZONING AT~S ~P N~B~S 50-26-2 ~O
50-26-5; BY C~GING ~E ZONING
C~SSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED
REAL PROPERTY FROM A-2 TO "PUD" PLANNED
UNIT D~VELOPMENT KNOWN AS WATERFORD
ESTATES PUD CONSISTING OF 63 RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING U~ITS, LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH
OF WMITkKER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE
NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE KAM~OCK ROAD
(CR-864) A~;D APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES WEST
OF CR-951, IN SECTIONS 9 AND 16, TOW14SHIP
50 $O[r~H, RANGE 26 FAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CONSISTI~IG OF 19.4~ ACRES; AND
BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Beau Keene of Evers, Meal & Purse, Inc.,
representing Dan Peppers and Dugan Porter, petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real property;
MOW, TMEP~E~ORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners 'of Collier County, Florida:
T~e Zoning Classification of the hereih described real
property located in Sections 9 and 16, Township 50 South,
..Range 26 East, Collier Cou~ty,'Florida ~s changed from A-2
to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD
Document, attached hereto as F. xhibit "A" which is
incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The
Official Zoning Atlas Map Numbers 50-26-2 and 50-26-5, as
described in Ordinance Number 82-2, are hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION TWOt
This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of
notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has
been filed with the Secretary of State.
PASSED AI~O DULY ADOPTED by the Doard oE County
C~mmissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ';ch
Apr£1 _, 1991.
ATTEST:
JA~ES .C.. GILES, CL£RK
~APP~OVED AS R.~ AYlD LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BOARD OF COLq~TY COHNISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PATRICIA ANNE GOODNIGHT%~ CHAIR.MAN
T~ mdlna~e f{l~ with the
o~ ~,£', ~J.,~, .~',
A$~ISTJUiT 'COUNTY ATTOTUV£¥
R-90-27 0RDINARCE
nb/4194 '
PLA~gED U~ZT DEYELO?~E~T
FOR
YATERFORD ~STATES
Prepared
Evera, Neal & Purse,
2403 Trade Center Way,.Suite ~8
~&plee, Florida
DATE ISSUED: JulT 25, 1990
DATE REVISED:' April 9t 1991
CCPC DATE:' KarCh 7, 1991
~CC DATE:...APril 9. 1991 --
O~DINANCE ~0.:
EXHIBIT "A"
TABLE 0£ CONTENTS
SECTION I, STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ........................
SECTION II, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP
2.1 - INTRODUCTION, LOCATION AND PURPOSE ......................
2.2 - SNORT TITLE .............................................
2.3 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION .......................................
2.& - TITLE TO PROPERTY ...................
SECTION III, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ..............................
3 1 - PURPOSE
3.2 - GENERAL PLAN OF DEYELOPMENT .............................
3.3 - COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ORDINANCES ...................
3 & - LAND USES -
3 ~ PROJECT DENSIT~ '
TABLE I - LAND USES AND ACREAGE .....................
3.6 - EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES .................................
3.7 - ROADS ...................................................
3.8 - ENTRANCE FEATURES .......................................
3,9 - OPEN SPACE ..............................................
3.10 - CONCURRENCY HANAGEMENT .................................
SECTION I¥, RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ..............................
& 1 PURPOSE '
&.2 - MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS
4.3 - PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES .......................
4.4 - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
SECTION ¥, R£CREATION ........................................ 12
5ol - PURPOSE ................................................ 12
5.2 - DEYELOPMENT PLAN ....................................... 12,
5.3 - PERMITTED ~SES A~D STRUCTURES ........ ~ ................. 12
5.& - PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS ............................. 12
5.5 - PROPERTy DEYELOPME:~T CRITERIA .......................... 13
S~CTION YZ, WATER MANA~Z~ENT AREAS ...........................
8.1 - PURPOSE ................................................ l&
6.2 - 9EVELOP~ENT PLAN .......................................
6.3 - PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES ..........................
6.1 - PLA~ APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS ...........................
SECTZO~ VIZ, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMHITMENTS .......... ' ....... 15~
7.1 - PURPOSE ................................................ 15
7.2 - GENERAL..~ ............................................. 15
7.3 - PUD MASTER PLAN ............ ~ ..............
7.& - ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITM£NTS ......................
7.5 - WATER MANAGEMENT AND ENGZNEERZN~ COMMITtlENTS...'...16 & 17
7.6 - TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENTS ........................ 17 - 19
7.7 - UTILITIES COMMITMENTS .................................. 19
7.8 - FIRE COMMITMENTS ....................................... 20
7.9 - EICEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIOiIS ........... 20
PUD MASTER PLAN .................... ~ ............... ATTACH?IE:IT 1
· o :
SECTION Z
ST~T£HENT OF COHPLIANC~
The development of approximately 19.4 acres of property in Collier
County, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as Waterford
Enemies, will be in compliance with the planning goals and
objectives of Collier County ss set forth in the Growth Nanalement
Plan. The residential and recreational facilities of Waterfor~
Estates will be consistent with the growth policies, land
development regulations and applicable comprehen$1vs planning
obJectivee for the following reasons:
1) The subject property is in compliance with the Future \
Land Usa Element (FLUE) of the Growth Hanageaont Plan
(GNP) which is evaluated ss follows:
A. The project development is compatible and complimentary
to the surrounding land uses.
B. Zmprovements are planned to be in substantial
compliance with applicable rslulations.
C. The project development will result in an efficient
and economical extension of community facilities 1nd
services,
The project development is planned to incorporate
natural systems for water management in accordance
with their natural functions and capabilities.
E. The subject property is located within the Urban
· . Residential Destination as indicated in the GMP's
Future Land Use ~lenant (FLUE) amd Future Land Uae
Hap. Hors specificall7, the site is within the Urban;
Hixed Use District which permits s variety of
residential development subject to compliance with
specified criteria. The proposed project is permitted
a maximum base density of four (&) residential dvsllinl
units per gross acre. Since the site consists of
approximately 19.4 acres, the proposed project is
permitted a maximum total of 78 units.' Furthermore,
the Petitioner proposes to construct a total of 63
units on the subject property (Reference: Companion
Petition SMP-90-31). Therefore, the Subject petition
is in compliance with ~he FLUE of the GNP.
Furthermore, the FLUE centaina a new provision
interconnection that is stated as follows:
"If the project fails to interconnect with all existing
projects when Physicell7 possible, and fails to provide
lnterconnection with all future adjacent projects,
up to 1 (one) dwellin$ unit per gross acre may be
subtracted as deemed appropriate bl the BCC".
· ~ote: iction of the B~ard of County Commissioners limits the
project to s maximum total of 63 residential dwelling
units.
A~hough in~trconnac~on ~i~h ad]acan~ proJlc~s is
or desirable ~van ~hl con~tlura~o~ and ~oca~on
of the alta, con[iluration of adjoinin8 atrlecs, and
the neiShborin~ land use pacclrn. Therefore, the ·
baal denaicy ahall be parm~cCld aK ~ naximun of four
(&) residential dvallin$ un[el per lroml acre.
HovaYar, per action of cee Board of County
Conn~aalonara ac ica naaCin$ on April 9, 1991, the
project ia permic~ld a max~num ~o~al of 63 residenc~a~
Jvallin8
- 2 -
PROPERT! DESCRIPTION AND O~NERS~IP
2ol I~NTRODUCTION~ LOCATION AND PUIPOS~
In is the intent of Dmniel Peppers mad Dulmn Pot&er,
hereinafter called "Devmlopars", their successors and mealies,
to establish · Planned Unit De~alopnant (PUD) on spproxleacsl7
19.4 acres of propers! located in Collier Coun~I,
Florida. The subject project is generally located 0.8 niles
East of Count! Barn Road sad 0.6 lllll North of
Road in ~ha Northwest t of Jet,ion 16 and the Southwest
Boulevard and ia ~ransec~ed by ~hitaker Road. It is the
purpose oI this docunsnt to es~aBlish .~tandards and luidslines
[or the lu~ure de?elope·ne o~ this properKy.
2.2 SRORT TITLE
This ordinance shall be known and cl~ed aa nYa~er~ord
PUD Ordinancen.
2o3 ~ECIL DESCRIPTIO~
The subject proparcy being 19.&~ acre· is described as follows:
E '½ o~ ~h· $9 ¼ o[ ch· N~ ~ o[ the N~ ~ ol Section 16, Township
§0 South, Ranis 2~ EasKI Reset?iai the North 30t and the East
30' Road Right-of-gay
and
E ½ of the N9 ~ of the S~ ~ of tht.N~ } of Section 16, Township
50 South,'Rania 26 East; ResarTtng the East 30' and ~he South
30' Road Right-of-Uny
and
E ½ of the ~V } of ch· ~V } o[ ~he NV ~ of Section 16. Township
50 South, Ranze 26 £asc; Les· ch· South 30' and the East 30'
Road Riihc-of-Vay
and
S ½ o~ the $~ ~ o~ ~hs S~ ~ o~ ~he S~ ~ o~ Section 9, Township
$0 Sou~h~ Ranis 2~ Ease= Subject to an easeman~ ~¢ross
Ease 30t for inlrsss and egress and Ro·d
all proper~ies sicua~ed, lying and being in Collier County
Florida. ,
TTTL~ TO P~0PE]{TY
The subject property is ovned by Damiel Peppers and
Dus&n
- & -
3.1
3.:2
3,3
3.4
3.5
SECTION III
PROJECT DEYELOPMENT
PURPOSE
The purpou,! of this Section is co lenerall! describe the plan
of the deYslopmen~ lad delta·scs the lensrsl condL~Eons thac
rill uppl~ to ohs project. '
CEntRaL PLaN OF DEYELOPME~T
Ya~erford E·cutes ~s · plsnned communit! includ~nl a =lx~ure
of'residenti&! uses and recreational, conservation and water
s&nslsesnC related el·sene·,
COM?LIANCE ¥ITH ~PPLICABLE OXDI~AXC~
The pro~ecc is intended co be in cospliancs vith the applicable
Collier County Zoninx and $ubdiv~s~on Regulations as veil
Is other Collier County Develops·ne codes in e~fecc nc ch·
tine bu~ldinl peraics are requested,
Table I is a schedule of ch· intended land use ~ypas v~ch
epproxisate acre·lee. The err·al·nest of ch·se land use types
is shorn on ~xhibic "A", PUD Master Plan. Minor ch·uses
and variations in de·iSa and acre·x·s shell be permitted ac
final desiXn co acc·ne·date ~opolraphy, ~eleca~ion and other
P~OJECT DENSITT ~
The total ~creale of Yaterford ~sCete· is approx~saCel! 19.&
acres and ch· CHP permits ch· project a maximum base density
of &.O units per ir·ss acre, Horsy·r, per action of the Board
of County Connissioners ac ~a meecinl on April 9, 1991, Ch·
project is pernicced a maziuus coral of 63 residential dvellin8
- 5 -
¥~kTERFORD ESTATES
TABLE !
LA~D USE
..... Recreation · ·
R-O-~ baser?ed for Dad~ca~ion
Tot&l
10.6
2.8
2.9
0.2
2.9
19.~
- 6 -
3.6 ~ASEHENTS FOR UTILITlgS
£asements shill be provided /or water monoGooent
utilities and other purpoaos as ma? be needed. Said easements
and improvements shall be in compliance with the Collier Count7
Subdivision Relulations in affect at the ti~e · permit is
requested'or requirad.
All necessary aasements, dedications or other
shall ba [ranted to ensure the continued operation ·nd
maintenance of ·11 service utilitias in compliance with
applic·bla ralulations in effect at the time approvals era
requastad.
3.7
Ill roads within the development (not includinI ami portion
of ~hiteker Road, Sunset Blvd,, ldkins Avenue, or the Santa
Barbara Blvd. Extension) shell be privata roads to be
perpetually maintained by an eppropriate homeovnerta
association.
3,8 EITIANCE FE!TUIE~
It vide strips of land adjacent to each side of ~hitaker load
mai be utilized for beautification purposes. Permitted uses
and structures within this ·rea include: fences, silnale,
lendscapins end other customer! uses associated with entrance
beautification.
Ill necessary easements, dedications or other instruoents
shall be $ranted to ensure the continued operation and
maintenance of these facilities in substantial compliance
with applicable relulations in effect at the tine approvals
are requested.
3.9 OPZN SPICE
I minimum of size! percent {602) of the project's Iross
shall be devoted to us·bls open space in accordance with
Collier Count! Ordinance 89-~2. This requirement shall not
apply to individual development parcels.
3.10 CO~CU~RENCY HANAGEHENT
Development permitted b~ approval of this petition viii be
subject to · concurrencl review undor the provisions o! the
Idequ·ta Public Facilities Ordinance (IPFO) ~o.
the earliest or next to occur of either finnl S~P approval,
or bulldia[ permit issuance applicable ~o this prolect.
SE~TXO~ 1¥
A.1 PURPOSE
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE
4.2
4.3
Ae
The purpose of this section la to aec forth the development
plan and relulaciona for the areas deailnated on Actachman~
1, PUD Naater Plan, as Residential.
F~XIMUH DWELLING UNIT~
A Aaxisus number of 63 iinSle family attached and/or
detached units aa! be constructed.
~ERHITTED USES AND STRUCTUR~
No building or structure, of parc tharnof, shall bm erected,
altered or used. or land nasd, in whola or part, for ocher
~han tha following:
(I) Single Family leaidenca.
'(2) Duplex'Residence..
· . (3) Earthsinini co be permitted only in conjunction
with rater management/lake(a) micin~ pursuant
to Collier County Ordinance Es. 88-26.
:~ '- ' - 'B.'~:lccaaao~{ Usesg ". i~.-:-''.' ·
'" ' :-- ' · · ' · ,- o . · .. . 4~,".'~ .... '.' .' ~ -
' ':~'~:"(1')'Custos&r~ acceaaory'~aea and structures 'lncludinl'
~ "~':' '>-" ." :.'~"i~r 7'.:'/ :'private $~a~e4'. ;;-.:;.. ': . . . . .. . '
,: .... ".'. ' ';"'; :: :":~' (~) Hodel Homas~ '."'"' ' ' '
a) Hodel hones a~all be parmi~ted in conjunction
with the promotion o£ the davelopsa~t. No
sore than threa "DrI ~odelm" may be constructed
prior co recordinl o~ aplac for the project
ii applied £or by the project owner. Site(s)
for the model(m) must conlora to zoning
standards and be located on a future platted
lot. A seres and bounds.legal daacrip~ion
shall be provided on the site plan required
aa part of the building permit issuance.
Access shall be provided to each model lrom
the nodal serving as a #Sales Center" or an
approved independent "Sales Center". Access
shall be for pedestrian traffic only; no paved
road will be alloyed.
.0
A "Sale· Center" nay be constructed prior
to recordtnl of a plat. The "Sale· Center"
· hall be limited to one structure (one butldin~
permit). It may be serviced b7 · temporary
utility system (i.e., dry wall ·nd septic
tank/drainfield) prior to availability of
central ut£1it7 systems ·t which time
connection to the central ·ystan will be made.
Interim fire protection facilities in
accordance vith NFPA require·eat· are required
unless n permanent water ·ystea i· available
to serve the Center.
c) Review and approval of the "Sale· Canter"
........... shall follow the requirements of the Site
Davelopaent Plan process (Zonin$ Ordinance,
Section lO.S). A metes and bound· lelal
description shall be provided as part of the
application. Access to the "Sales Center"
· hall be provided b7 · paved road or temporary
driveway which ·eats Count7 Standards. A
water name·anent plan must be provided which
accoanodacea the runoff ~rom the "Sales
Center", the required parkinl, and access
road/driveway and any other impervious
surfaces, The ·ysta· ·hall be dasilnad to
fit in with the ma·tar water anna·ameer system
for the entire development.
d) At the tine of bnildin$ permit application
~ ........... for · "Sale· Center#, · temporary use permit
shall be obtained, "Sales Centers" nay not
be occupied until · Certificate o~ Occupancy
.is issued...Models must obtain · conditional
CerttfEcata of Occupancy for model purpo·e·
only. Model· ma7 not be occupied until a
permanent Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
(3) Recreation facilities.
(4) Water nanageoent facilities.
DE?ELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Cederal:
Ail yard·, setback·, etc. shall be in relation to
individual loc boundaries.
B. Minimum Lot Area:
6,000 square feet.
Hinimum Lot Width:
1) Corner lots - ?0 feet average between front and
rear lot lines. In the Case of wedge-shaped corner
lots, the [ront lot line shall be a line
lnterconnectinS the two points where side lot lines
intersect street rish~-of-vays.
Interior lots - 60 feet average betveen [roflt and '
rear lot lines.
Hlninum Yard ReQuire3ents:
I) Front Yard - 25 [eec.
2) Side Yard - 7.5 feet unless zero lot line unite
are utilized where the minimun aide yard shall
be increased to 10 feet for the non-zero lot line.
3) Rear Yard - 20 feet.
&) All yards abutting s street shall be front yards.
Four-sided corner lots shall have two front and.
two side yards (except where a lot abuts more
two streets[ in this case, each side of the lot
abutting a street shall have m fro~t yard).
Five-sided corner lots shall have two front,
side and one rear yard with the rear yard bein8
farthest fron tbs abutting streets (sxcept where
a lot abuts more than two streets~ in this case,
each side of the lot abuttinl a street shall have
· front yard).
Hininum Floor Area o[ Principal Structure~:
1) One story: 1,200 square feet of living area
exclusive of patio and garage.
2) Two story: 1,600 square feet o~ living area
exclusive of patio and 8arage.
Haximum Height:
(1) Principal Structures - 30 feet.
(2) Accessory Structures - 1~ feet.
Off-Street Parkin~ Requiremen~t:
As required by Collier County regulations in effect
at the time building permits are requested.
- 10 -
---r. , Aa required by Collier County regulations In ef[ect
~ at the time bulldinI permits are requested
~" Aa required by Collier County tabulations in
~.~d at the time bulldins permits are requested
'~ 3. ~'dditio~ Requirement :
~ I) Trects~B ~j~d D, ia identified on the PUD Mascer
----~,,.u un~s. furthermore, all lo:s developed
".~: ~n Tracts B and D shall be e=~lrely =ero-lo~ line
~"" un~s or en~i~e~y non-zero
, 2) Trac~a F and ~, al ~den~i~ed on
. Plan 8 SCar
'k.~ rely with simile-racily
,. in Traccs.F and.'H shall be entirely zero-lot line
-':'; units or entirely non zero loc line unica.
~ . 3) E~ch reaiden~ial lot shall be developed wl~h a
· -~ -extnun o~ one reliden~iel dv*llinl u~i~ .per lo~.
~ '' Furthermore, ill.sinllt_tlnilI ac~ached units shall
__ .. be Joined alonl ~.comno= wall a~ {he proper~y line
" 'oepara~inl ~he ~vo rtsiden~lll.lo~s
..L . '' "' -' ".-' ma n .
~-~-.->.-'......-~.~... · --:- l..~lininLa.,iniaun o[ i I0 too~ sida yard fatback'
requireien~ Ior.'Che moa-zero' side Iard.lo~ lines..
""; ' In ~ddi~lofl, tll,sinlle~llnilI de~ached units shall
'" 'be'required ~o nfin~ain a tinimu=
~'~:~ ' side yard setback requiremen~ [or all side yards.
· .,:,_ - I1 -
SECTIOff Y
PURPOSE '
plan and regulaciona for the area designated on Actachnenc
1, PUD Master Finn, aa Recreation.
5.2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The primary purpose and function of the recreation area
will be Co provide common recreation facilities for use
by residents and [uesta.
5.3 FERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No bulldinl or structure, or pert thernof, shall be
altered or used. or land used, in vhole or in part, for
other ckan the follovinl:
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures:
1. Open space and outdoor recreational facilities.
Pools, tennis courts, nhuffleb~¥d courts,
racquetball courts, asnociationTrec~eacion/naetin~
.. halls, chicken huts.
3. Perimeter fence amd similar security structures.
'"' B.' Permitted Accesso{7 Uee~ and Structuresc
I. Accessory uses and structures customaril~ associaltt
vith principal uses permitted in this diacric~.
3.& PLAN APPROVAL REqUIR~EffTS
Plans for these uses shall be submitted to Development
Services £or scar! raviev and ~pproval of the plans and
their concept/daniSh. Construction plans shall be in
accordance vith these approved plans. The perimeter
boundaries o[ such plans shall be recorded in the same
manner an a platted lot.
5.5
PROPZ~T! ~EYELOP~E~T C~ITE~I~
A. Overall site design shall be haraonious in terns of
landscepins, snclosurs o! structures, location of access
streets and perkins areas (it any) and location.and '
trss~nen~ of buffer areas.
B. M_..l~lnum Yards - Both Principal and Accessory Structures:
1) Front Yard: 20 feet.
2) Side Yard : 7.5 fast.
--'-3)' ln~r Yard : 10 feat.
&) Separation between structures: 10 feat.
C. Maxinun Hei~h~ - 30 feet.
D. O~her Standards: Off-street parking, iandscapin~,
.... aianaxe, and nzher e~andards not addreseed hereim shall
he aa required ~! C~llier Count! res~la~ions in effect
at the tiaa bulldins perai~e are requested. , -~
E. Site Development Pla~ ($DP) approval ,hall be require~
for the recreation ars, in accordance with Section
10.$ of'th~ Colli~'Count! Zonins Or~inance.
S~CTION ¥~
rATEr ~AC~E~T AREAS
~URPOSE
The purposo o! th~s section is to ae~ forth the development
phn and relula~ona for the ~reas des~nated on A~tachmen~
1, PUD Nester Plan, aa racer Hanalement.
D_EYECOPNENT"PLAN
The primary purpose of the racer aanalenent areas will
be for flood protection and water detention ~n accordance
v~th applicable codes and o~d~nancea.
P~RMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES
No buildin[ or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected,
altered or used, or land used, Xn whole or in part~ for
other than the folloving=
A. Permitted Princip&l Uses and S~ructure : ~
1, Open space. ..
2. Lakes and other functional ~ac$1$~es fo~ use such
es v&ter ~ana~ement.
3: 'per,meter fence and similar securXty structures.
Permi'tted Accesso~ Uae~ and S~ructgres=
~...~:....:.;.. ... ... 1. ·-Accessory.usaa and.structures cus'touar~ly associated
· .. ~lans for ch'ese uses shall be s~bn$c~ed co
"~ ' Sera,cas for scoff revSev and approval of.cEe plans and
-- . ~heSr conc~p~/des$gn. Construction plane shall be
accordance v$ch chase' approved plane. The perSae~er
· -...~ boundaries of such plane shall be recorded
-- manner as a P~Cced
- 14 -
$~¢TION
~£NE~AL DEYELOPH~NT COH~ITHENTS
7.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Sect/on is co set forth the development
cona£taents Q[ the project.
7.2 G~N~AL
A. All facilities chill be constructed tn strict accordance
vith the Collier County Subdivision Resulations, the
County Zonin8 Ordinance and all applicable federal,
state and local codec in effect et the time
· - PerBite are requested
B. ?hie project shell be required tn meet all County
ordinances in effect et the time buildinl permits ere
requested.
C. Subsequent to approval of thio project, final
conatr~ct~on plans and ~nal sabdivilion plat shell
be submitted for reviev and approval.
A. The PUD Kester'Plan, attached es Attachment 1 hereto,
ia an illustrative Preliminary development plan.
The deailn criteria end layout illustrated.on
the PUD ~nster Plea'shall be understood to be
mr-th~he'~inal-.des~$n may 's&tie~y tho project
criteria and comply vith ell applicable requirements
o~ thin ordinance ........
All necessary easements, dedications or other '
instruments shall be lranted to ensure the comtinued
operation and maintenance of all nervice utilities
and all areas in the project.
Revielone to the PUD ~aster Plan may be permitted
subject to Subsection 7.27J. of the Zoninl Ordinance.
- 15-
7o& EN¥IRONHENTAL
~. ~11 propose~ ~iti~ation for i~pacts to Collier
~urisdiccional v~clands sholl comply vich the
and requirements of Appendix 7 o! the South Flor~
Water Hanagenent Dis~ric: rules. Hit£~ation orals
shall be surveyed prior to [inal construction plan '
approval end desisnated as e conservation
end/or tract vith protective covenants pursuan:
Florida St&~utes. Chapter 70&.06.
B. Prior to final Pint/construction plsn epprovsl,
developer sheiI submit · ~ypical ~uildinl lot
clearin~ plan ~o be included in the homeouners~
7o5 ~AT~ HANA~H~NT AND ~N~ZN~ZN~ COHHZTH~NT~
~. Detailed pavin~, ~redin~, site dreinnle end u~il~
plans shall be subni~ted to Pro,act ~evieu Service~
for reviev. ~o construction per,i~s shell be issued
unless end until approval of the proposed construction
in accordance uith the ~ubni~ted plans is ~rented
Project ~evieu Services. '
B. Zn accordance ~i~h ~he ~ulee of the South Florida ~a~er
--'---aafi~ement District (SF~D), Chapters ~OE& end
this proJec: shell be designed ~or a storm even:
3-day duration end 25-;ear return frequency.
¢. Desisn end construction o~ all improvenencs.shell
~ubJect to conplience vit~ the appropriate provisions
of the Collier ¢ou'nty Subdivi~ion
An £xceve~ion ?ermit viii be required ~or the proposed
lake(e) in accordance vi~h Collier County Ordinance
No. 88-26 and SFV~D rules. All lake setbacks req~ed
by this Ordinance shall be adhered to unless reducel
utilizinl lake setback curves.
E.I copy of SFWMD Permit or Earl! ~ork Pernit is
prior to cons:ruction plan approval.
Landscepin$ shall not be p'laced vithin the rater
manasement areas unless specifically approved by
Reviev Services.
7.8
In addition to the lO0 ft. of right-of-~ay being
dedicated for the future Santa Barbara Boulevard
extension, the developer shall dedicate an additional
l&O ft. for a drainers easement [or canal widening
and maintenance purposes in accordance with the District
~o. 6 Drainage Study. Any reduction to this requirement
is subject to review and approval by the Water
Hanale=ent Director.
For all off-site roads to be improved by the developer,
drainage, improvements for these roads to insure a
positive discharse and adequate capacity is required
in accordance with Collier County standards and
Florida Water Hanalement District rules. Construction
permit from South Florida Water Banalement District
is required. All improvements shall be approved by
the Transportation Services Director. Such i=provenents
shall be linited to re-gradin8 o~ roadside swales to
insure positive and adequate flow.
I. This project periueter tradin$ shall be designed
zero discharge for lO0-year, 3-day atorn event, unless
drainage improvements, guaranteein$ a positive outfall
to ~oyal Woods Col[ and Country Club, are constructed
as part of the proJec~ development.
J. Plattin~ is required, in accordance wi~h Collier County
Subdivision ~egulations, if any lots, trac~$ or parcels
are ~o be sold.
Z. Work withi, Collier County right-of-wa? shall meet
the requirenents of Collier County
Ordinance ~o.
T~A~SPOETATION CO~ITHE~TS
A. Baaed upon Future trip assignments to Santa Barbara
Boulevard Extension (Davis Blvd. to ~attlssnake-Ha=~ock
~oad), Whita2er ~oad, Sunset Boulevard, and Polly
Avenue, the following needs ~o be addressed by Collier
County and/or the developer (subject to the
determination of the Collier County Transportation
Services Admi~istrator) prior to initiation o~ final
development processes to include pernits for site work:
1. The Developer shall provide appropriate right-of-
way dedications for Whitaker ~oad (County Barn
Rd. to Sunset Blvd.), Santa Barbara Blvd. Extensiom
(parcel frontage), Sunset Blvd. (parcel frontage
to Adkins Avenue). and Adkins Avenue (Sunset Blvd.
to Santa Barbara Blvd. Extension).
- 17-
2. ~mprovement of the above noted seleents of Vh~taker
Road, Sunset Blvd. and, also, Poll! Avenue to County
Standards. . ,~.
3. The Developer shall dedicate appropri~t~draina$o
easements consistent with the overall'area '
development plan.
ImproveeenC of off-sits drainale conveyance to
a pasitive out·all.
B. The developer shall provide · fair share contribution
toward the capital cost of a traffic slsnal at the
project access to Santa Barbara Blvd. via Whitaker
Road when deemed warranted by the County. The silnll
shall be owned, operated, and e&intained by Collier
County.
C. All traffic control devices used, ezcludinl street
naee sales, shall comply with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316~07~7,
Florida Statutes. ·
D. The Developer shall provide arterial level street
lilhtins st all project accesses.
£. Access improvements ·hall not bo subject to impact
fee credits and, ezcludinl sisnalizstion, shall be
in place before any certificates of occupancy are
issued. ..
F. Ro&d impact fees shell bs as set forth in Ordinance
85-5~, as amended, and shell be paid at the time
buildins permits are issued ~leas otherwise approved
· by the Board of Ccvnty Commission·rs.
G. Because of the potential of'adjacent roadways not
conformins to appropriate service level standards due
to the rate of increase of traffic ~olumes versus
scheduled/funded roadway capacity improvements, the
developer is advised that fvturs land development
activities in the area nay be subject to future land
use control consistent with the Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance.
H. With reference to Attachment ! to this document, the
~ollowins stipulatioms shall apply:
1. A total o~ l?& feet o~ ri·he-of-wa7 £3st of the
section line shall be dedicated to Collier Count!
as pare o~ ~he pla~lnS process.
- 18-
2. Said right-of-ray shill ba ded£caced for roadvoy
and drainage purposes.
3. The use o! 20 feec o! this rilhc-o~-voy along the
Eastern aide for i berm to facilitate tho rater
manesemenc lake ia saCiafactory rich the stipulation
that nodi~icacions to the berm me7 be made by
Collier County aa & result o~ pernittin; and
construction of Santa Barbara ~oulevard.
A,Vater service shall be provided chrovlh connection
to the County central water ayStel.
B. The water main must be extended Iron the Collier County
Vater/Sever Dlstrictes oxistins transmission main on
Vhitaker Road to the project site and extended within
the project, aa required. Thm system nusc be properly
dsaisned and sized to supply &yorase and peak day . '
domestic den&nd in addition Co fire flay demand at" ~-
m race approved by the appropriate Fire Control Dlacr~cc
· aervicin[ the project area,-
C. C°nscruction documents for the wager and sewer
,lmpr~vemints rel'atinS to the development of the propmrcy
. · mus~ be. reTleved and approved by Project Ravine Services
· prior co the approval of buildina permits on the
.proper~y.' .,.
~v ': ·'!.i :;'. ~."co~v~anc. Of chi w.t.r mid ..w.r ..twice
~<~ .... '- .'"' '' 'to the Collier County Vater/$ever District BUSt
~ .'..-.~. .... --. comple~ed'prior t~'~'p~roval of any Certificates be
:.-~'~".;..:;.L. ." '.".'. :Occupancy'for structures on"~he re erg of
' ',.', ".:' i' . .- .'.-. -....--~ .... ,.-~..-..- - :. P P y,
· E. Cons{ructiOn an'd'ovnerahip;~f.~h~,~aCir and .sever
": · . facilities'shall be in complii'nce 91ch 811
:. DiYlSion a~endarda, policies; ordinaflcee~ practices,
ecg, in effect at ~he ~lme construction approval is
requested. '
.. F. ~ewer service shall be provided throuzh connection
to the County central sewer system.
C. Connection to the exlacin8 water and sewer facilities
within Whicaker Road riiht-of~ay ia required and must
be fully illustrated on the final construction plan
and supporting eniineerinl conatru¢~lo~ drawings as
co location, sixe and
This project shall be designed for central water and
sewer systems.
- lg -
7.8 FIRE COMMITMEMTS
Fire hTdrants shall be appropriately located to meet the
requirements and approval of the local fire district. ·
7.9 EXCEPTIONS TO COU~T! SUBDI¥ISSON RECULATIO~S
A. Article XI, Section 17.H: Dead-end streets shall be
deafened as a cul-de-sac. However, 'such streets shall
' ' ~t'%~ed 1.200 feet in length.
Article X, S~ction 19: Street name signs shall be
approved by Project Review Services and all traffic
circulation sisnage shall meet USDOT FHWA NUTCD
requirements and standards.
Article XI, Section 10: The requirement for reference
markers to be placed in water valve covers ia vaive~.
subject to P~oJect Review Services approval and subject
to meeting State Statutes. ~
- 20-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REQUEST THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE A
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES
FOR AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-124.
OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board approve the attached re~olution
which sets forth procedural requirements for amendments to the Land Development
Code (LDC). This resolution will replace resolution 93-134 which was approved by the
Board in March of 1993.
CONSIDERATIONS: Resolution 93-124 set forth procedural requirements for
amendments to the LDC. One of those procedures requires that the Collier County
Planning Commission (CCPC) hear the proposed LDC amendments for the first cycle
of the year (January cycle) in March, and for the second cycle (June cycle) in
September. Review by several entities prior to the CCPC hearing is generally
necessary (where the proposed amendments are cumbersome and/or where many
amendments are proposed). These entities include the public at large, the EAB,
EPTAB, DSAC, CBIA, Naples EDC/Chamber coalition, neighborhood and
community associations, and various impacted special interest groups. Providing this
information to all of the interested groups, and soliciting and receiving input and then
incorporating that input into the staff report for the CCPC, within the required time
frame has been difficult.
Additionally, there have occasionally been conflicts with other priorities making it
difficult to schedule two evening hearings during the month in which the CCPC is
required to hear the proposed LDC amendments. As an example, the current LDC
amendment cycle is required to be heard by the CCPC in March. The Comprehensive
Planning Section is also scheduled to bring forward the EAR based amendments for
consideration by the CCPC in March. Additionally, legal staff will be involved with
litigation at the State level during the latter part of March.
Staff has discussed these conflicts with the CCPC and was directed to replace the
existing resolution with one which provides greater flexibility, but at the same time
does not allow a proposed amendment to languish for an indefinite period of time.
The attached proposed resolution does not set forth a specific month in which LDC
amendments for a specific cycle must be heard by the CCPC, but rather states that the
first cycle (January) of amendments in any calendar year must be heard by the CCPC
on or before the last Wednesday in the month of May for that calendar year. For the
second cycle (June), the amendments must be heard by the CCPC on or before the last
Wednesday in December of that calendar year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this resolution will have no fiscal impa!
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This proposed
consistent with Collier County Growth Management Plan.
r~olution
i8
PREPARED BY:
ROBERT J. MULH~RE, AICP DATE
CURRENT PLAN1NING MANAGER
DO~--ALD W. KRNOLD, AI~P DATE
P G SERVICZS DEPAR'rM~NT DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMIiNT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DMSION
-2-
IlAR 18 1~7
RESOLUTION 97-
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCAL
REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR
AMENDING THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
D£VELOPMENT CODE AND REPLACING
RESOLUTION NO. 93-124
WHEREAS, Section 163.3202(1), Florida Statutes, requires
that local governments adopt land development regulations that
are consistent with local co~prehensive plans; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.3202(3}, Florida Statutes, requires
that local governments compile their respective land development
regulations into a single land development code for the
particular Jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Collier County did adopt a comprehensive plan on
January 10, 1989, known es the collier County Growth Management
Plan (GMP); and
WHEREAS, Collier County did adopt unified land development
regulations on October 30, 1991, known as the Collier County ~and
Development Code (LDC), which became effective on November 13,
1991; and
WHEREAS, Section 1.19, LDC, provides that the LDC may be
amended up to two times in each calendar year; and
WHEREAS, Division 2.7, LDC. provides procedures pertaining
to advertisement, public notice, and hearing dates for amendment
of the LDC; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the citizens of Collier County
adequate opportunity for submission of proposed LDC amendments;
and
WHEREAS, in order to provide county staff adequate tim~ to
review proposed amendments and to prepare said submissionz for
consideration at public hearings; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that each amendment cycle of the
LDC is not intended as an opportunity to rewrite the LDC, but is
an opportunity to address glitches, legal deficiencies, to
incorporate land development regulations as r.~r~d by the GMP..
and to change the substantive law aa necessary and appropriate
for the changing needs of Collier County.
NOW, TMEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY TME BOARD OF COUNTY.
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER CODNTY, FLORIDA that=
In addition to the statutorily mandated amendment procedures
detailed in Sec. 1.19, LDC, and Div. 2.7, LDC, the followlng
requirements and procedures shall be followed before an a~ndment
to the Collier County Land Development Code shall occur=
1. All proposed amendments to the LDC shall be subm/tted
in writing to the Planning Services Department along with the
required nonrefundable filing fee as set forth in the Land
Development Code Schedule of Fees, for each amendment to Lny
section or mubsection of the LDC.
2. A letter of application requesting amendment of the LDC
shall accompany any proposed amendment to the LDC and sha!l
state, in addition to any background information or explar~tton
in support of the proposed amendment, the following:
I (We), .,
acknowledge that submission of the enclosed proposal for
amendment of the Collier County Land Development code and payment
of the filing fee in no way obligates the Collier County Board of
Co~nissioners to adopt the proposed amendment. I (We},
., further acknowledge that
Collier County staff, interviewing the proposed amendment or may
recommend rejection of the proposed amendments by the Collier
county Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners.
3. Proposed amendments shall be submitted tn strike-
through/underlines format with the entire section or subee=tion
to be amended set forth. Proposals shall be typewritten.
4. A duplicate copy of proposed amendments, letter of
application and explanation of the proposed amendment shall
be simultaneously submitted to the Office of County Attorr. ey
for review.
5. Proposed amendments ehal'l be received at the Planning
Services Department and Office of the County Attorney prior to
5:00 P.M. on the submission deadline date(s) established herein.
IlAR ! 8
6. Amendments to the LDO required by the GMP, including
but not limited to incorporation of adopted Land Development
Regulations and GMP mandated amendments thereto, or amendments
required to meet legal deficiencies in =he LDO shall not require
a filing fee.
7. Submissions deadlines for the first amendment cycle in
any calendar year shall be as follows:
January 1'~ shall be the last day for a petitioner to
submit an application for proposed amendment to the LDC.
The Collier county Planning Cor~nission aha11 be
scheduled to hear the proposed amendmen%s for the first amendment
cycle on or before the last Wednesday in the month of may of that
calendar year.
8. Submissions deadlines for the second amendment cycle in
any calendar year shall be as follows:
July 1': shall be the last day for a petitioner to
submit an application for proposed amendment to the LDC.
The collier County Planning Commission shall be
scheduled to hear the proposed amendments for the second
amendment cycle on cr before %he last wednesday in the m~nth of
December of that calendar year.
9. No proposed amendment may be submitted which was
rejected by the Board of County Commissioners during the previous
amendment cycle unless otherwise directed by the Board of County
Commissioners.
10. The procedures provided herein shall apply to all I.DC
amendments exclusive of emergency amendments as provided for by
Sec. 1.19.1.2, LDO, Planned Unit Development rezonings,
amendments to the zoning atlas map, amendments to the LDC
directed by the Board of County Commissioners, amendments
required by the Growth Management Plan, and as otherwise provided
herein.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and
majority vote favoring same.
-3-
AGENDA kT E.M.
m IAR 1 8 1997
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOArD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
MARJORIE M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
LDC AMENDMENT CYCLE RESOLUTION/md
-4-
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE
TO ORDINANCE 90-69, AS AMENDED, ALSO KNOWN AS
THE ASTRON PLAZA PUD, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT, HAS NOT COMMENCED
CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7J.4 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
RESULTING IN SEVERAL POSSIBLE COURSES OF
ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TO CONSIDER.
Staff' is requesting that thc Board review staffs findings and
recomm~tio~ r~,~rding ~ above referenced PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on September I 1, !~90.
Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier Count)' Land Development Code requires that the project
developer submit an annual report on the progress of development, commencing on thc
fifth anmiversary of the PUD approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The
singular purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not the project has commenced in
earnest in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 2.?.3.4. For those PUD's
approved prior to the effective date of adoption of the Land Development Code, the five
year approval period commenced on the adoption date, October 30, 1991. Therefore, the
conditions set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. are applicable as of October 30, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which was approved prior to
October 30, 1991 and which has not commencx, d construction as defined in Section
2.7.3.4. Staffhas utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report, supplemented by
field observation and review of in house records to verif), the current status of the PUD
and as the basis ora recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided in
Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2. Z3.4.
I?me limits for approved PUD master plans~ In the event that a
PUD master plan is given approval, and the landowner(s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a
development order for all infrastructure improvements to
include utilities, roads and similar improvements required by
the approved PUD master plan or other development orders for
at least 15 percent of the gross land area of the PUD site tn. cry
five )'ears of the date of approval by the Board Of Count)'
Commissioners; and
Fall to rece!ve final local d~,velopme~ orders for at least 15
perctnt of the total number of approved d~elllng units In the
PUD, or b~ the case of PUD's consisting of nonresidential u~es,
$0 percent of the total approved gross leasable floor area within
the PUD every slx year~ of the dale of approval by the Board Of
County Convnlssloner~
The project developer shall submit to the Planning Services
Director a status report on the progress of development
annually commencing on the flfth anniversary date of the PUD
approval by the Board Of County Commlsslonera The
tlngular purpose of the report will be to evaluate whether or
not the project has commenced In earnest In accordance with
the crlteria set forth above.
ShouM the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has commenced in earnest, then the land shall
retain its existing PUD approval and shall not be subject to
additional review and consideration of new development
standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has not commenced in earnest, then upon review
and consideration of the report provided by the owner and an).
supplemental information that may be provided, the Board Of
Count), Commissioners shall elect one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period of
two years; at the end of which time, the owner will again
submit to the procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be consistent
with the Growth Management Plan. The existing PUD shall
remain in effect until subsequent action by the Board of the
submitted amendment of the PUD.
If the owner fails to submit an amended PUD within six
months of Board action to require such an amended submittal,
then the Board ma), initiate proceedings to rezone the
unimproved portions of the original PUD to an appropriate
zoning classification consistent with the Future Land Use
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
In the case of Developments of Regional Impact, time limit
restrictions shall be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time
limits contained within the applicatlon for derelopment
1 8 1997
approval and approved as part of a development order In
c~nformance with F.S, :~ $80. 06,
Svnonsis of Aooroved Land Ui~i; This 7.63 acr~ PUD was approved for 115,000
~luare feet of busix~ss and professional office space, I:aaking or financial ir~itutioe, s day
car~, and a r~-taurant. The PUD al~ contains th~ required preservation/open space,
Consistency with Comorehensive Growth Management Plan: The subjoct PUD is
4mi~nazed Activity Cemer (Interchange) eo the Future La,nd Use Element (FLUE) of the
Growth Manag~ (GMP). The Activity Center is designed to concentra~ almost all
new c, omngrcial zoning in locations wh~r~ all traffic impacts can nmdily Ig gccommodat~
and to avoid strip ~ of d~vcloprncnt. Since th~ subj~ PUD is l~a!_ed_ within the
southeast quadrant of the Pine Ridge Road/l-75 Interchange Activity Center, the FLUE
permits conuxn:rcial land uses within this PUD. Based on staffr~view of the approved
business and professional office uses, banking or financial institutions, day care, and
r~xtaurant uses, the Astron Plaza PUD is consistent with the FLUE and the GMP. The
PUD ~ also been dca'ned consistent with the Traffic Circulation Element and the Open
SpacedNatural Resource Element with minor r~,isions to the PUD document.
Consistency with the Collier Count~ Lan~l D~v~looment Code: The PUD ha~ been
distributed to the appropriate jurisdiction r~vi~, entities specifically for review of the PUD
for coosis~enc~ with current l~nd development regulations. Based on that review, the
following inconsistencies have been identified:
Transportation: Section 4.9 of the PUD (Traffic Impacts, access management, ~c.)
No inconsistencies were reported however, staff advises that certain references should be
changed to reflect current administrative regulation if the PUD is to be amended.
Environmental: Section 4.7 of the PUD (Protected Species, green and open spaces)
No inconsistencies were reported however, staff advises that certain references should be
changed to reflect current references if the PUD is to be amended.
Engineering: Sections 4.3 and 4.4 of the PUD (Sewage/Water, drainage issues)
No inconsistencies were reported however, staff advises that certain references should be
changed to reflect current administrative regulation if the PUD is to be amended.
Architectural Theme: There are no architectural theme requirements that were adopted
with the approval of this PUD. However, Section 2.8 of the Land Development Code
provides architectural and site design standards that will be applied during the site
development plan (SDP) review process to any commercial development within this PUD.
I MAR181997
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff'is oft.he opinion u~.t tho~ is insufficient justificatio~ to m:luin: an owner to submit
sn amended PUD s/reply be~.~se ~ PUD rd'¢r~w.~s cod~ that sr~ now cousolicl~ into
tl~ L~d D~,~lopment Code, or otl~rwise have r~femw.~s of sdminisu~ve import tim
bef..~se ~ c.h~ged or ~ otherwise pl~l in a diffcrmt ie~isl.~iv, document. Their
closest or most similar r~lztio~hip to current r~fcrences applies in tl~ administration of
PUD dev~:lopmcnt commitmmts. Mor, importantly, is when, her or no~ ~ is any ~
of ~ ~ mofl~l to mzl~ the PUD comist~r~ with today's cod,
appli 'c,ibl¢ to subsequcr~ r~quircd development approvals (i.¢. Planing ~d/or SDP's).
FISCAL IMPACT: An amendment to ds PUD, as r~commc~ed by staffwill have
no fiscal impac~ o~ Collier County as the appropriate PUD amendment and o~r
zpplic, abi¢ fees ss-ill cover the cos~ of stafftime associat~ with review of said amendment.
and the cost of ~venising and public notice.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on a comprehensive review of this PUD
document, s'~ff re. commends that thc Board of Count)' Commissioners grant a two year
ex'tcnsi~ of thc Astron Plaza PUD per the artach~ resolution.
PREPARED BY:
/ "~-~_, ,/ ~ .... -.--..
RAY ~II~LLOWS
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DATE
R~V!FWED BY:
DATE
~BERT J. MULHERE, AICP
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MAR ~. 8 1997
-~.~,...' .
.,.-.., ......... o oI, c£ 9o: ....· "";' ': ":"
~ ORDIH~CE ~ZN~ O~ZN~CE ~
8R-~ ~E ~~$~E ZONING
... ...... ?-.. ~ 'FOR ~E ~IN~T~ ~ OF'~Z~ '
. ' COU~ ~DA B~ ~ZNG ~E OFFZCZ~ .~
~. ~ _~/ ~Y 10TH ~ S.W. ~D ~ ~Z ~ ~Y
~,~ _~.~y THE D-2 ~, ~A~ IN S~IOM 17, '
~ TO~S~Ip 49 SO~, ~GE 26
CO~I~ ~ ~DA, ~NSI~G OF
DATE.
~S, Pamela S. ~ac'K~. of ~ings & ~, represen~ing
A~tron Development of Nmplel, Inc., ~titioned ~l ~oar~ of County
Co~issioners to change the zoning classification of ~l
described real
NOW, ~FORE BE IT O~AINED by ~l Board of Co~ty C~fssfoners
of Collier County, Florida:
l°Cat~d;'i'~'~i'~ti~n 17, To,ship 49 Sou~, ~g* 26 East, Collier
Cou~tyj ;~o~ida, is changed from "E" ~tlt~s to ~P~- ~l~ed Unit
Development In accordancl wi~ the P~ do~ent,~ltta~ld hereto
'~.ihi~ ~A".vhich ia tnco~orated h~rein and'by refer~ce'nad~-~a~{
hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Hap N~er' 49-26-3, Is des~i~d
ordinance Number 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly.
This Ordinance shall ~come effective upon reclipt of not fca from
the Secretary of State ~at ~fs ~dinance has ~e~ filed vlth
Secretary of State.
DATE: September 11, 1990 BO~ OF C~Y C~ISS~ONERS
..... .;..' CO~I~ ~, F~RIDA
N
AST~ON PLAZA
A
PROJECT SIZE AND LOCA.TION:
7.6 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION 17, Toq~sHIP 49 SO~H, PJ~NGE 26 ~
ASTRON DEVeLOPmenT OF NA~LE3, INC.
800 LAUREL OAR DRI~E, ~'~ITE 203
IqA~LE3, FL 33963
REVISED DATE: AUGUST 15,' 1990
FAC:--'"'-"'--
Executive
SECTION I -
1.1
1.2
1.3
1,4
SECTZON II -
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
$~C~ION III -
3.2
sECTzo~"rV' _
: - .. ... , . :.,. 4.1
4.2
PROPERTY OWNZRSH/'P ~ D~r~ON
~gal
Propm~y
Physical
General
Proj mot
Project Phasing
Site Development Plan
P~D USES ~
Pe~itted ~c~
Gi~er~l - '. : .,..--,.'.-..
I-1
Z.-2
I-2
I-2
II-1
II-1
II-2
ZI-2
II-2
III-1
III-1
· '" ' ' ' ~ : 4.5 "Util~ties', Power, Telephon, and CATV
.......... 4:9 . .Transportation StlFu/atio~ ........
EXHIBITS
A. Conceptual PUD Master Plan, I-1/2" x 11" - Exhibit "A"
.B. Typical Roadway Section, ~-1/2" x 11" - Exhibit "B"
regulations for As~ron Plaza, a Planned Unit Dewelop~mn~ intended
· to provid~ offic~ faclliki~s ~o ~ p~fessio~ cockily. By
s~mittal of this d~ent, ~e ~tl~oner ~s re~s~inq to r~zon~
7.6 mcrm~ from Z~ta=es (~) to a PI~ U~ ~vmlo~mn= (~).
SubJ mcr property 'i~ included In .~e PAne ~/I-75 a~lvl~y center
a~ ~et fo~h tn th~ newly adopted Colli~r Co~ 6~ ~agemen=
Plan.
Astron Plaza vi11 utilize the ~istLnq vegetation and other native
spe¢i,a within a thl~y (30) f~t l~ca~ buffer on
prop~y line. ~ts buffer will ~in~atn ~ inte~i~y of
~eighborhood to ~he ~ou~. ~c~ss to ~e proJe~ w~ll
Oaks Boulevard.
Astron Plaza will consist of four p&rcmls. One parcel will
initially be utilized for an intert~ wastevater treatment plant
that will be deco~u~ssioned at such tee as County sewage
collection becomes available.
':" '"' STATEI(ZNT OF O0~FLZARC~
This"pT°Ject is' in compliance with the goals and obJe~cfv~s~of~the
Gro~ch Hanagement Plan
southeast co~r of
on the highway n~twork and to ,~e safe ingr,ss/~ess.
¢ r ...¢
PROP..E]~Ty OW3ffERSHIp AND DESCR/PTION
Description of la~d surveyed beir~ a par~ of Tract 30, Trac~ 25 and
Tract 26 of Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 33 (P.B. 6, Page
C911ter County, Florida, containLng 7.63 acres Bore or less as
follows:
All that part of Tract 10 of Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 33
acco. rding to ~he plat ~hereof as recorded in Plat ~ook 6, Page ?0,
Public ReCords of ~11~er Co~ty, Flor~da~
Official ReCords Book 8~0, pag~ 1597, ~lic Re~ of'
County,
containing 1.59 acres ~ore or ~ess; ':: "~
according to ~e plat' ~eof as reco~ed ~ Pla~' ~k 6, ~ge 70,
~bltc Records of Collier County, ~l'~r~da~
~SS ~D ~XCE~ING ~erefrom ~at parcel desk,bed al ~rcel 113-R
in Official Records Book 970, Page 705, ~1~c Recor~ of
County, Florida;
subject to easements ~d res~r~ions of record;
containing 2.94 acres ~ore or
~D
All that pa~ of ~a~ 26 of Golden Gate ~tu U~t No. 33
according to the ~lat ~ereof Is recorded ~ Pllt ~k 6, Page
~blic Records of Collier. Co~=y,
~$S ~D EXCE~ING ~erefrom that parcel descried as P&rcel 139
Officfal Records Book 850, Page 1598, ~1~c ~co~ of Collier
subject to easenants Ind restrictiorm o~ record;
containing ~.10 acres nora or less.
.. .T.he .aubJect .p.roperty is currently under the ovnership of The
Vineyards Interchange Partnership,. A Flori~ General
Par'cnership consisting of the following:
Ross W. McIn~osh, Trustee
Scott H. Pritchard
S.W. Pritchard Jr. and
Beatrice H. Prttchard
Husband and Wife as an
Donald A. Gel-~h-ar~l
Elizabeth C..Ger%h .. .
1391 Third Street S.
Naples, FL 33940
Naples, FL 33~99
]~C. 2, Box 741
.Arcadia, FL 33821
27721 Forrester Drz SW.'7. ' ''
Husbahd a~d Wife a~ an i:. '. . Bonita Springs, FL.' 33923 ~]
~ Estate by.the Entirety ~ "-.':~--. ..... .' ? -.--, r-.:-
· '~','~.-~: :',' --T-..~"?:.' -."~.. %"/ ", ·
1.3" ~NE~L DESCRIPTION:OF I~tO~CT~i n:'.. '..".'f -'
· , ...- .. -..-.. ... ~.:~,=.._. . .. ...... : :.....' · .:.~ -.... ..... <:~..;:,:..'
~. ~ .'1 ..... ?:' The' ~'o~ i=i' ;'l~;" ;OiCi~, ..... ~ ..- ...... . ......... ;..,:. ,,,....-.~.. -
... ... . 7.~ .acree located i~:i*ction
Florida. Said parcel is bordered to' the' north b~ Pint
· . Ridge Road, to the east by Oaks Boulevard, to the south
by 10th Street SW ar~ to the vest by the Z-75 .Canal
adjacent to. Interstate 75.
1.3.2
The current zoning classification of the property is
E - Estates' District.
"F
-!
.T
Tile physical, characteristics of l~e sits lncluds a ninuCe
parcel of sc~ ~ress ~o ~e ~o~eas~ (0.2 acres) vi~ ~he
~Jori~y o~ ~e sl~e hi~ ~1~ couAs~V ~l~y o~ ~he
roll,lng sp~ies:
slash pine
cypress
caMbage palm
SUBCA~OPy
vax myrtle
dahoon holly
Brazilian pepper
winged i~c
str~gler fig .
staggarbush
Taxo~ iu~ die~ichu~
achinus tersbinthifoliv~
Ficus aur1~
..... Lvonia ferr~oinea.
GROUND COVER, Z~CT.,ODX:~G' ]:~~ A.~D. ~ 't ': -.
co~on a~ pl~t /:]~.~?j~ Tilla'~sia fasci~lita ..
;., ,. .......' ,,, ,. spanish ~ss" -~ ~.~r.~lll~ndsia ~sn~idev "
....... .sedge ' · ~.~ [~e~t.strioa tv.,-..,m~ .'
-a i ..... .~ ' · - ....... - · . I ~' ,~ W'" "'
): ?.'. ~ ', · ~ .... S~ . -
~L.~. - bro ' .. ', . ,.:I =- .,. -"' '
'' z~e vine Cassia filifoni~ ,.~,.~...., ......
- -::, · · '~.- ca~sa~ weed -'~'~-G""<~uFem~. ~n~se, v~ ...- . -
-'[:"'~ ~'~ oison .................... ' .....
P t~ :' . ".' ~ '- Toxic~end~n' rad~ca~-
~uscadine ~pe ''~
tlckse~d
reindeer lichen Cladoni~ app.
contadina ~adina canesca2~
finger ~ass Chloris
golden polly Phle~iu~ aurlu~
Elevations wi~ln ~e project range fr~ approx~tely 11.0
feet H.G.V.D. to 12.0 feet N.=.V.D. ~tsttng ~a~age ts to
the wes= to ~a 1-75 canal.'
Native soil t~es tn ~e a~ea are ~ri fine sand, ~zell fine
sand, and Charlotte fine sand. Soil ~ara~erls~lcs were
derived from ~e soil sudsy of ~ollier' County, Florida,
issued by the U.S. ~pa~ent of A~i~e ~'19~4.
'C'
oO
~ECTION II
PROJECT DL~ELOPHE~T
Regulations for developnsnt cf Ast~on Plaza aha11 be in
accordance w:~th the coat:ants of thais POD Ordi~ncs, a~d ~e
Collier County ZonL~g Ord£nance, w~th exceptions as approved
by this ord:~nance.
All terms shall be as defined in t. he "Collier County Zoning
Ordinance- ~u~lees o~he~lse noted.
2.2.1
~ D~r~LO~T A~D LA~D US__7.
All nectslary aasent~ts, ded/.cat~ors' or other
instruments shall h ~t~ to'u~e'.~e cont~nu~
o~erat~on and ~k~nce of ~1 se~c~ Uk~t[es.
~e pe=~=~oner Or ~y s~se~en~ ~rs Shall Pr~tde for
maln=~n~nce, of. ~y ...cmon...~ space, ~a~ag~
fac[![ties, lakes, re~eat~o~ ~m, ~1 arias or
any other a~eniti~ ass~iat~ vi~ ~e pro~sed
development.
Prior to completion of the project all
this PUD document shall bs let by the developer or h~s ·
designee. If certain coua/taents are to b, ~et d~ng
the final phase of cons~lon, edemata
shall be established to ass~ t~t all C~ents are
~et by ~e devtloper or his designee at ~ t~ of
completion of ~h~s p=oJec=.
.f
2.2.2
Any variation in the nester plan ~er this sect. ion shall
be pursuan~ ~o all ~t ~vel~en~ ~e~la~o~ as
to 7.27J of the Zoning Ordinance 12-2.
Master Plan.
2 . 4 PROJECT PHASZN~
Specific project phasing Is not anticipated for Astron Plaza.
Project buildout will be dictated by ~arket demand.
2. ~ S'Irf 'DfvELoP~NT PI~A'N
re,ired improvements ~ buffering Shell receive ~he appr~al
- .of all appropriake 'Collier CO~M ~ve~ agencies
insure.compliance wi~ the P.U.D. ~ster Plan, ~e
.. .~ker Plan, ..~e Co~tM S~ivislon.~e~a~Ao~- ~ ~e
~.'- pla~kin~ laws of khe Sta~e of Fiori~ ~ ~ili~
~e developer of anM ~rac~ or ~rcal s~ae~ent to
s~ivision shall be re,ired .to s~i~ a~ receAve
approval of a si~e develo~ent plan in confomn[a
with ~e re~Ar~en~a es~lished vi~tn Section
lO.S of ~e Zoning Ordin~ce.
S--&CTI OM /ZT
~PR~C~PAL ~ ~CCT.~SOR¥ USF.~
No building or structure, or pa~ thereof, shall be er.crud,
aktared or used, or lar~ used lnwhole or,re, for o~her t~n
the following.
2.1.1 Per-treed Principal Uses and
Tracts 1, 2, 3 and 4
~ a. Drive-in bank or financial
b. Off/cas, business ~d professio~l,
testament no~ to ~c~ed 2,000 sq. ~. ~ adve~is~g
.::- .'-..' and. outside s~age shall ~t
restaur~t. . .
c. Day care center.
d. Interim vaste~ter .trta~t
only} . '
3.1.2 ~e~i~ted Acc~sso~ Uses and
Accesso~ uses and st~es ~sto~r~ly
the pe~it~ed Principal uses will
~, 2 D~E~PMENT STANDA~
The development stand,ds Pr~td~ heze~ a~ly to ~s 1
through 4 unless specifically noted o~e~lse.
no more than 4 tracts, vt~ a ~x~ ~r ~a not to ~ceed
110,000 s~are feet.
1. ~tn~um ~t Are~ - ~f~y-nina ~o~a~(39,000) SF
~inimum Ya~ Rec~Jlrement,
Front Yard - fifteen
internal road rSght-of-~ay or road easement
· - line ....
(b] Side Yard - one-half (1/2) of bulldi~ h~qht
' wi~ a 10' ~1~.
(c) ~ulldi~ ~e~ck fr~ ~e
fee~.
(~) Bulldi~ ~e~ck fr~ ~e X-TS ~l eas~t
-~efl~-flve (2~) fee~.
(e) Buildi~ se~ck fr~ 10~ Ave~
facilities ara to ~ co~~
project and shall ~ r~ ~ ~.
to be o~ed, operated I~ uJn~
his assigns or successors until su~ t~ as
offff-site se~er facillkles a~ avall~le to se~ice ~e'
project. The interh trea~tmt facilities shall supply
se~ices only ko ~ose la~ ~
approved By ~e Co~2 for cleveland.
facility(les) Bay rick h e~ to p~vide s~'er
se~ice outside ~e developBen~ ~a~ appr~ed ~ the
County wi~out ~lttefl consent of ~e C~.
Tract 3 . will Be .reserved ' for an interim on-site
"'.. -
· ' ~ ' -':' ~ ' - ....... ~'-- ?~%-'~--~XI.l.~.~ ~ ~'.~J~.-.-~r~ u ~ -,~.-~-~.~.~..'~' ~< _'.
· · ' L . .- ' , ; .0.j°.: : .... . ,..-' -~-' ' .--., -' .... f' .w~,~..',,-~;..,. q~ ....-Z<~- ;- ~ .-~,-¢--'-" · '- .. '
........... ..~~,;.~..,.,.,..,. ~-=_,~,~,~ -- ,,...
,..,.. a~R i 8 m? {
, ' -.,~.~.~. - .,~ :-.. ,.... ::, .......~. ~.,,?.+,:..,,;. ,~...?,,.;~
· ,;,fa;';'.o. , .....,.... , o . .. ['."'. ~ .:.o .-...,,...o
' ' "": .-.-: ---"-. .L.,._,, .. ~
revert ko the peraltted principal u~s vhen the
vastevater treatment facility Is deconalesioned.
oo
Wastev&ter Treataent Plank (I~dTP) DeYeloj~e~t Standard~:
(a) Yard Requlrenent~ for ~P: 50' (all ya~da). '
along ~ no~ ~r~ter, ~ ack.ante
Section 8.37 of ~e Zo~
(c) ~so~tlon ~ds ~ffer ~ir~: 10' l~p~
minimum of four fe~t a~ve effluent
~sorption beds.
I continuous hedge of shrubs shall be planted on Tract 3
property libel. All shrubs are to be cold hardy and ·
minimum of 36" in height. The shrubs on the north side of
Tract 3 must be 10 gallon elis'{lth a I/niau~ of $4" in
height. All ehrubs are ko be planked on 3~ centers.
t~·ir fo~Lage dur£ngth·'v~ter'le&son. ~exL~pZe o~ the
an ·vet·ge of 25 foot centers.
and Tract 3 reverts to the peraltted principal uses,
these buffer/landscape des~gncriterAa wall no longer.be
in effect. The buffer/landscape requAre,en=s for Tract
3 will then be as required An SectAon 1.30 of the Zoning
Ordinance 82-2 latest a~en~mtnts, and th~s document.
3.2.2
A landscape buffer shall be provAd~d ·long the south
property line adjacent to Tenth Avenue SW and partially
along the east property line adjacent 1~o Oaks ~ulevard.
Sa~d landscape buffer shnll be h a~ord~ce with Section
... -.. -'.-, ..... .. ',.. . 8.37 of the. ZonXng ~d~n~ce, except ~e ~fer shall
."r~:.,r~j~';.~t~ ..... ~'a n~n~ of 3'0' ~ ~dth. Water ~q~t
,--..~ /~'~ .... ...?.. :'- :, . .. ..., ., . ............. · .. ;~-..
~-~.~-~-~z~:<.-~-~.~'- -~,~ ..... : ~' -,.'" .~ -', · .. ' · .
~:~'~.~,--~,.~. ,:~-t~.- ~.~.~ ~ .~;-.'~;.;~:-?~.' ,.,..--. ~ ..... · . , · .
r~ ~ - . ..... ~"~ .... ..':.:.' . -. P d by ~e Collier Co~_y
.... · ' =? . ~f~':._'.:'=: - ... . ... · ...';. -.= .... . ~ . . . 2 ·
'.',:.~m.,.- .... ; .~lated.by. deed r~trlctto~ ~ c~ts '~.." '' · ' '
· - '"'"'~:~:7" ~i~=u= ~,~d,=~pi~ =,~=~en~ ,~u~ ~ ~= ,,
~n Section ~.30 of the 2on[ng Ordnance 12-2 and
amendments ~d as ~y be ra~r~ aro~ ~e ~P/Tract
3.2.5
Nlnimum off-street parking and off-street loading
requirements Ihs11 be ~et as reqUired ~n SectAon I of the
ZonAng OrdAnance 82-2'and latest nuendlents.
3.2.6 Lighting: All 1Aghts shall be located and'oriented In
such · ~aru~er_~.o..a$ .~ot.to .produce glare Onto adjacent
~. "'~ '~,-'~'; · 7..r- ~'~:;.- .1.'~- ~-~,,-;- . -~.- ~--~?.~ .. ;'-' ~;.- ..~" · · - . · '
,~"' %";~'~?. ~. :l?'- .'~ . . . ~(= ' ....-....
.......... .,, ~. ..~ ~., ,~ ~,.~-,. .
.'. ~
. / MAR 1 8
:].2.?
Prior ~:o any site plan approvals or tie sale
eSt~lA~ ~ ~o~ ~e~nts ~/or deed res~rl(
a~li~le to all .cf ~e .P~les '~der
~ese c~n~ a~/or deed res~l~Aons shall set
~a~ all ~V~l ~rcel d~elo~fl~s shall
c°a~t~le ~ra~er, color o~, r~t ~erlals,
gAUge desA~. Said r~a~lo~, c~e~nts, and/or.
res~rl~Aons shall be of accepk~ly high
shall ~e eAforced ~ ~e o~er a~ developer.
It is the I~veloper~s lntant to &dh~rs to s~ pl~
~aclliti~s ar~ co~~ ~ a~o~ce vl~ ~e f~l
developmen~ plan as a~ed ~y ~1 appli~ll m~cX~l
agencies, and in acco~ w~ f~al, I~tl ~d 1~
la~a, c~es, and re~at~o~.
4
4.2.3
All traffic control devict~ used, excludinq street alqr~,
shall conforn ~th the Kanual on Un~forn Traffic Control
Devices (Chapter 31~.0747 Flori~ S~tes].
There shall be only one point of access to the proJec~
from Oaks Boulevard and Xt shall be al~roxl~atelv
centered on that frontage.
4.2.4
The developer shall provide ~n sa~t b<~nd right turin lane
on Pine Ridge Road and · ·~u~h Bo~md right turn lane on
Oaks Boulevard at the pro~ect entrance,
4.2.5
The developer s~all provide collector level street
lighting at the pro~ect antrance.
4.2.$ The above improvements are considered "alta related- as
defined in Ordinance 85-55 and shall not be applied as
credits toward an~ ilpact fees required b7 that
ordinance. They shall be in place Before any cer~lficats
of occupancy are Issued. Payment of Y~pac~ fees shall he
in accordance wi~h the fee schedule as set forth An
ordinance 85-S5.
· '.' O .... · . -. , . ~ ~Axer,~
, .' '~"~...."' ,.. ~ ",'_ ..... ~-~ .... .,~ .......... , '.
-
· ~so~tLon Beds, in accord~ce vL~ ~outh TlorLda Hater
~na~emen~ DlstrLc2
4.3.3
Detailed landscape and water ~anagement plans and water
management calculation~ shall Be su~aitted to show ~hat
the required quantity of. water can be provided An the
area ~ointly used as a landscape'and drainage easement.
.
4.4.1
water distribution, sMVe coLlar, ion and tranfnlssLon
end lnteri~vaterend/or ~trtat~int facilities
County O~l~e ~o. 81-74, u ~, ~ o~er
Ipplicible Co.ti ~IS a ~l~.
4.4.2
All c~2stosars connecting to the water distribution and
s~vage collection facilities to h co~ed viii be
custom,rs of ~e Co~ty lsd will ~ billet by ~e ~o~ty
in accordance wt~ ~e Co~ty's ts~lishtd ntis. Should
~e County not b, in a.~sitt6n to provide'stir .a/or
........~. sewer stairs .,to...~t
.established to
.... .~ ..... ~.' · '~ · '-':~L~,72." 4'.17-" · ' - ' '
~ " .......
· ......... 4 4 3 .... ; -; ~ .... 2'~' ..... &~ '' ' ~' ~' '~ ' "~'",' ....
· , .'
.~ '. · ', ultimately 'su~lv
.....damand · and/or ~e~l'i~-;'~ ~2[[~~ ~~.~, ...~: '~, ......
--- ' '. ~ 1%.:-:'~ :'-.-.~":,'~;~:'-.,. ~.:'e .,.~....-g ~g . ~ted.bY
position to suppl~ ~ls ~t.r to'~ prol~t ~nd/or
co~ences, ~e ~veloper, it Als ~e vi11 ~ I~.
disposal facilt~t~ adm~a~''~i Met ~1 r~mn~ of
be ade~lately buffer'~ A~'~~d. ~ a~eeaen~
shall be an~er~ .into bet-~een' ~e ~M a~ ~e
.Developer~ b~di~ -~n '~e :'~velo~r, '~'"'~si~
· u~iltzed. ~ea ....... ' ~'- '-
~.... .......... . .......... .,,, % ............. ... ,....gr~an~ ~t,h.le all ~' "~' ;' .....
: -''-'--'~'.='~ ~ ,. -~'~ ~CO~f]~ '~
~:-.;~._-.=; ...... .~,. , ..... Y~,... p lot
........... ,~.,. ~<,.,,, ~
.... ~~
.... .
-?~..e.;.=~..~.?~i-~,~.. ........ ,:;......,.,~..~.~:. ~~.~.~- ., .. ·.
/~.. '~"' '-~,~:'."~,' ' ~' · , . . .. ..:.v ~.:, · .... '. '. . -~ .; ..,' ~.'..' · · ~ .
ra~iramanta of Collisr Co~R~y Ordl,-~nc& Wo. I.-'7~, es
amended.
.e
4.4.4
4.4.5
If an intarl~ on-sits water ~ly, treatment and
transmission facility ia utilized to serva the proJec=,
At BUSt be Pro,fly sized to ~ly avenge ~ tay
domestic d~, in ~ition ~ f~e fl~ ~ at a
rata appr~ ~ ~ a~ro~riate FA=e Control Di~trict
ae~/cl~ ~e pr~J~ area.
Extension of the off-site water d/sar/button .Y~tem to
se~e the proJec~ shall be coordina~ed vith Collier
County to extend the X~" '~ar ~n f~ ~e Presen~
tempora~
- 'j.~: '::"~ ': ~'li~e' '6n Pi"~:~a~;~".~ .;~.~&tO. ~l ~ rtght~f~ .
--,.. . ~ ~ . ,potn~ .... ,~,~ ~ P ' "~:~iz '"
~.- -..~....,,.,~ ..... r .... ~ ~, · .~ .... -,,.,,. ,.
:.,;~.~~';~'.~ -.,'...' ';; '~: ', ' · ~:~ -.~i~VI t~' '~ ':' "--; ~..-. i ..... ;. I
--~.-~.~r~.'.:.:7':/Y;;'-,.._..- .,...',.,,'~~~:~ a~ ~ ~-. . ·
....... ~':~ ~=~..,..-.-~, '_ ..._ ~ ~~.~ ..... ~~i16~ -~-~'~:. . .?., . -,. '
' ? ' "' ~ The'S""-:' : ;: ~"~.' ~....' ..~., . ' 'v~1%~.~o.=~ ......... ' ·
............ . .?~-~-v- .; ~ ......
..'.-.-..-~ -. ..-..r.~. : ..= - ..- ..-.. ~'~uR'saall,b :-,.:= .....
Oaks Boulevard t0:k-~:/?i~:~':".'%'. ' ? 'J~CX ~ ~red uhde~ '
....... . '~: :' ~e pro~e~t '..-" '
4.4.6 '- .... ~ · ' --~ ...... .:' - ·
The 'u~['lity const~iom..,do~en~ for ~e proJe~,,
' "se'werag~
and *'con,t~i0~"&~;",~.: '._;:' · _
~- ~--=A~e force ~ Which Will
ultima~ely CO~e~ ~e 'Pro~e~"~ an7 furze..central
interconnected to '~e" ~-' . ..'::':" trict, it ~ak be
~P a~tlon' wl~ ' ~PP~oPr[ately
located valve~ to ~it for ~ple re-diri~tio~ of the
... P~oj.ect,~ sewage ~e~..CO~ec~i0~. to the Co~ty,= central
se~er factlltie: .
able. ~.j. ~..~.~ ._.~ ..~(,,.~ .
'~-.
4.4.7
Prior to approval of construction aocuaants by the
to Chapter ~67, rlor~ ~utes, ~ ~e Florida ~blic
=e~ce Co~lssion ~s ~=~d t~to~al r~ghts to the
proJe~ ~til ~e cowry ~n p~v~da ~es, le~ces
~ovgh its water a~ sever facllAtl~.
4.4.8 The existing off-site water facilities of the District
must be evaluated for hydraulic capacity to serve this
project and reinforced aa re~uired, if necessary,
consistent with the County,s Water ~aster Plan to An~ure
t~at the District's water aystea can hy~aulA~lly
provide a sufficient ~tity
· . .4.~ .Appropriate easoen~ for ~e ro
pe~inent info~tion s~ll be ~tted ~ acco~ance
with the Collier Co~ty Ordin~ce
approved prior to ~e ls~ca
4.5 UTILITIES. POWER. -TEL£PHO~E AND CATV
Power, Telephone, Cable Television and any additional
utilities that may initially or at some future date serve the
.... pr.oJect, shall be installe~ as per County Ordinahc&'N0.·
Article XI, Section 19, Utilities, and in compliance with any
other applicable~ state or county laws, co~es, and ~egulatioms.
· :i~'.': ..... : i '/~......' '.: .i'..'
:.,.~ ~., ,. ~'~.~. ;* ~d~. ~ ......-~.c5._~:..~'.~,,~,~,~4 ..:-...,'..... .. ., ::'., : ,. . .. ~ ....
'0
o o
4 .?.1
SOlid Waste management aha/1 be assign.ed to
franchised battler who shall .be responSible for the c
and disposal of all solid waste generated by this day
Petitioner sh~ll be subject to Ordinance 7S-21 a,
by Ordinance Wo. Ig_$8 and Ordinance ]~o. 12-2 aa
Tree Removal Pezl~t). Preser*ation of vegetation
subject to the following:
e. ~etention of existing native vegetation An th
apace areas a~d landscape. SpecAfA~lly, ~v
~ I to ~ feet ~ h~l,k, .j,;'.. .n' ~eater t
c. A thi~y (30) f~t native species Vegetative buffer
the entire southern bOu~a~ shall e~end
sou~east co.er and taper off along ~e eas~,
bOUnda~. The ~l~y (30J foot native species regal
· :'] ;"£-:--'- · ~- buffer shall be retained, enhanced and main=ained.
: "'~-' .-. . ., areas.of Vegetation within :Ihs buffer zone that
:~'" '"""J::' "'~} impacted due t'o the Proposed 4ralnsge swale she:
4.8
4.8.1
4.8.2
Des~:gn and con~truc~ion of all improvements
s~bJect to co~liance with the appropriate provielon~
the Collier County Subdivision Regu/ation~.
Platting is required in accordance with Collier Country
SUbdivision Regulatior,~, if
are to be sold.
4.S.3 Work within Collier Country righ~_of.~a2 shall Beet the
" require"entj.Cf CoLlier ~ty riqht~f~y ~e 12-
'-, i' -. ",' :"~1 .: '
-' -:'.-:-.......
red,red By ~e S~viafon R~lat~o~ and
Ordinance.
are no~ pro.seal.' ~e ra~iremen~ ~o provide Slde~l~,
or no~ to, WAll h ad~us~ d~q ~e
. Master Plan appr~l Pr~S[
4.8.7
.e
4.'8'. 8
An excavation pera/t v~ll be '=equ~=e~ for the PropOSed
detention area i~. accordance vith Collier County
Ordinance ~o. 11:26 i~ South ~o:~tl ~atet ~geaent
O~st=~ct.
4.8.9
A ainl=ua of 200 feet separation a~all be provieed
between the retention areas and the a~ver treatment plant
absorption bede, in accordance with South ~lorl~A ~ater
~anagement District x4Ales. '
4.8.10 Detailed landscape Lt~t water ~anagement plans and water
management calculation~ shall he sttb~/tted to sh~ that
the re~ired ~antity o~ ~ter can ~ provided ~ ~e
area Jointly us~ as a l~dscape ~d ~age eas~en:.
~be~e ~ha22 ~e only one ~o~nt o: access to the P=o~ect
and ~: sba~ be app:o~ate~y cente:e~ on the Oaks
tu:n 2arias on O~ ~e~:d 'at.'~e ~=o~ect ent:ance.
MAR 1 8 1997
4.9.4
Access lnproveaen~.s s~all not be su~ec'c to ~ ~e~
credits and shall ~ In place before any ce~lfl~tes of
occupancy are Issue.
4.9.5
The road Impact faa shall 'be as set f6rth In Ordinance
85755 'as '"ended, I~J sh~ll ~ paid at ~e tl~ ~lld~nq
Pe~its are issued ~less o~e~ise appr~ed by ~e ~ard
4.9.6
All traffic control devices Used shall confor~ vith the
~lUal on Unifor~ Traffic Control D~ic~_ la required by
Chapter 31~.0747, F~orlda Bta~tes.
4.9.7 In consideration of
~anagement Regulations and t~a potent~a! of adJlcen~
.... . .~. r~advays not co~o~ng
standards due to ~e ~te of'~lse of t~ff~c vol~
versus sched~f~d~,
', '., ~.' '' the .. appi~cant'[sh~ld
......... rl~lac~ons.'
. ':...~.,:f:.~:'.....{-.: ;.~. ... .. ~.. ';.,-~ ,.. ...:...~ .:.
)MAR 1 8 1997
NOTE
THE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROgD WITHIN
THE ,RIGHT OF WAY ,~$ 'SHOWN tS CON-
CEPTUAL. FINAL ALIGflM~ OF
~OAD WITHIN TH~ RIG~ OF WAY
B~ O~TEaMINED DUalNG FINAL
TO ALLOW FOR OPTIMIZATION ~
LOCATION WITHIN THE.RIG~ ~ WAY.
1
2
3
4
s
9
lo
14
R~SOLUTION 97-
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
CCI~MISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PU]~$UANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEV~LOPKENT CODE AFFliCTING ORDINANCE
90-69 KNOWN AS ASTRON PLAZA PUD,
EXTENDING THE CURRENT PUD APPROVAL TO
MARCH 25, 1999; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
1~ W~ERFdtS, the Astron Plaza PUD, Ordinance 90-69 adopted on
17 September 11, 1990, is subject to the provisions of Section
18 2.7.3.4., of the Land Development Code (LDC), Time Limits for
1% A~proved PUD Zoning Districts together with their respective
2o Master Plans; and
21 WHERF. AS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
~2 provisions of the Collier County Growth Management Plan; and
23 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
24 PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoning for five
25 years, until March 25, 1999; and
26 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
27 Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
30
3].
32
34
36
39
4O
41
1. The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
as if fully set forth herein.
2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to March 25, 1999;
at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
approval.
BE IT FURTMER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board and in the records of %he Petition for
44 which the extension is granted.
-1-
MAR 1 8 1997
This Resolution adopted altar motion,
vote.
Done this day of
4
&
10
21
26
17
2O
22
24
2S
27
second and majority
, 1997.
BOARD OF COUNTY C0~MISSIONER$
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FO~{ AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
MARJOItlE M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
-2-
MAR ! 8 1997
STAFF REVIEW AND RE~NDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 83-45,
A!~O KNOWN A2 THE WESTVIEW PLAZA PUD, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUB~4ITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER/A~ENT
HAS NOT C0t~4ENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7.3....'. O}
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, RESULTING IN SEVEi
POSSIBLE COURSES OF ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY C0t4qISSIONE
TO CONSIDER.
9BJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff's
findings and recommendations regarding the above referenced PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on August 16,
1983. Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code
requires that the project developer submit an annual report on
the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary
of the PUD approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The
singular purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not the
project has commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria
set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs approved prior to
the effective date of adoption of the Land Development Code, the
five year approval period commenced on the adoption date, October
30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set forth in Section
2.7.3.4. are applicable as of October 30, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which
was approved prior to October 30, 1991 and which has not
commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4. Staff has
utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report,
supplemented by field observation and review of in house records
to verify the current status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options prov~.ded
in Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2.7.3.4. Time limits for approved PUD master plans. In t~e event
that a PUD master plan is given approval, and the
landowner (s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a
development order for all infrastructure improvements
to include utilities, roads and similar improvements
required by the approved PUD master plan or other
development orders for at least 15 percent of the gross
land area of the PUD site every five years of the date
of approval by the Board of County Commissioners; and
-1-
NO. ~
I AR 1 ,<3. 997
i
Fail to receive final local developmant orders for at
least 15 percent of the total n~,.~er of approved
dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case of PUDs
consisting of nonresidential u~es, 30 percent of the
total approved grose leasable floor area within the PUD
ever~ a/x Hare of the date of approval by the Board of
County ~ ssioners.
The project developer shall ~zbmit to the Planning
Services Director a status report on the progress of
develo~nt annually cc~mencing on the fifth
anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County ~issioners. The singular purpose of the
report will be to evaluate whether or not the project
has commenced in earnest in accordance with the
criteria set forth above.
Should the Pla.nning Services Director determine that
the development has commenced in earnest, then the land
shall retain its existing PUD approval and shall not be
subject to additional review and consideration of new
development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that
the development has not commenced in earnest, then upon
review and consideration of the report provided by the
owner and any supplemental information that may be
provided, the Board of County ~Co.~ssioners shall elect
one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a m~imum period
of two years; at the end of which time, the owner will
again submit to the procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be
consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The
existing PUD shall r,,~in in effect until ~lbsequent
action by the board of the submitted amendment of the
PUD.
If the owner fails to submit an amended PUD within six
months of Board action to require such an amended
sul~ittal, then the Board may initiate proceedings to
rezone the unimproved portions of the original PUD to
an appropriate zoning classification consistent with
AGE N I~ J'T,F..J~,
MAR 1 1997
the ~uture Land Use Element of the GroFth Management
Plan.
· n tha c~$e of developments of regional impact, ~
p~ ~or ~e 1~ ~ COn ~ ~ed ~i ~ ~
a~li~on for ~velo~enC a~roFal ~d ~~ ~s
~rt of ~ ~vel~nC or~r ~ co~omnce wi~ F.~. ~
380.06.
8'~mopsis of Apb, roved Land Uses:
This Commercial PUD, with the exception of high technology
manufacturing uses, such as optical, dental, hearing aids etc.,
was approved for similar uses found in the C-4 zoning district.
However uses such as restaurants, lounges, liquor stores,
automobile dealerships, etc., permitted within the C-4 zoning
district, are not permitted in this PUD. This PUD contains 20.37
acres.
with Co~prehensive Growth Management plan:
The subject PUD is designated Urban Residential on the Future
Land Use Element of the GMP. Based on the fact that all
infrastructures are in place, this PUD has been deemed ~improved"
as defined in the Collier County Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance
(Ordinance No. 90-23), and, therefore, consistent with the
Collier County Growth Management Plan. The PUD has also been
found to be consistent with the following GMP Elements FLUE;
Traffic Circulation Element; Open Space/Natural Resource Element.
Consistency with the Collier County Lan~ Develo~nt Code :
The PUD has been distributed to the appropriate Jurisdiction
review entities specifically for review of the PUD for
consistency with current land development regulations. Based on
that review, the following inconsistencies have been identified:
Transportation: (Traffic impacts, access management, etc.)
This PUD will be required to adhere to the provisions of the LDC,
including the Access Management Plan.
Landscape: (Buffers/Green Space)
The PUD document is not fully consistent with the requirements of
the LDC. However, the inconsistencies are minimal and in the
opinion of the reviewing staff does not warrant a PUD amendment.
_~_ I~R 1 8 ~997
Plmsuaing: (Signage)
The PUD doc~u~ent is not fully consistent with the requirements of
the LDC. The signage section of the PUD provides for pole signs
up to 25 feet in height. The LDC, as ~mended in 1996, has reduced
the height to 20 feet.
Enviror~men~al: (Protected species, green/open space)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Engineering/Si~ Develo$~nt: (Sewer/water, drainage issues)
The PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of the
LDC.
Bi~ ~c!fio Conditiona of A~roul:
Staff recommendations relative to each condition of the original
rezone approval are listed below:
Conditions of A~proval: When deemed necessary by the County
Engineer, the developer shall provide a fair share contribution
toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the intersection
of A~rport Pulling Road and westview drive.
Staff Recommendation: This condition of approval is
appropriate and necessary to accommodate the additional traffic
caused by the development of this project.
FISCAL IMPA/~T: A two year extension of this PUD
have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
Ordinance will
STAFF RECO~4M~NDATION:
Based on a comprehensive review of this PUD document,
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant a two
year extension of this PUD.
-4-
1997
PRE PARE D BY:
CHARRAM B~A.MTCHIAR, Ph.D. , AICP
DATE
REVIEWED BY:
ROBERT J. MULHERE, AICP
CURRENT PLA~NING MANAGER
DATE
DONAJ25 W. AR/~OLD, AICP
P~~~/~~,SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
~;]~NCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR
DATE
DATE
COMMUNITY D~VELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
-5-
1
4
s
&
?
g
14
Is
I~ESOLUTION 97-
A R~$OLUTION BY THE BOA/~D OF COUNTY
CO~MlSSlON~RS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LA.ND
DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE
83-45 ~O~ ~ ~S~IEW P~ ~UD,
EXTENDING T~ C~NT PUD ~PRO~ TO
~CH 18, 1999~ ~D PROVIDING ~
EF~CTI~ DATE.
2s w~E~, the Westview PUD, Ordinance 83-45 adopted on August
17 16, 1983, iS s~bJect to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.4., of
28 the Land Development Code (LDC), Time Limits for A~proved PUD
2! Zoning Districts toga=her with their respective Master Plans; and
20 #HE~F. AS, the PUD was sdcpted consistent with and under the
2= provisions of the Collier Co'they Growth Management Plan; and
22 WH£REAS, the applicant kas acknowledged that the subject PUD
2] shall comply with the Archite:=ural Standard~,°'as defined in
24 Section 2.8 of the La:d Development Code (LDC)
2s WHERS. AS, the Board of C~unty Commissioners has reviewed the
26 PUD and has deter~r, ined to ex=end the current PUD Zoning for two
27 years, until March 18, 1999; and
~O NOW, THER~FOPS. B£ IT R~$3LV~D, by the Board of Zoning
29 Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
30
3].
34
.25
36
39
40
41
1. The above re:itals are adopted herein by reference
as if fully se~ forth herein.
2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
3. Pursuant to said seTtion of the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to March 18, 1999~
at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.7.3.4.
Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon its
This
approval.
44 BE IT FURTHER RSSOLV~D that this Resolution be recorded in
cs the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
46 which the extension is granted.
-1-
IIIAP, 1 39 7
This Resolution adopted &feet notion, second and majority
vote,
Done this day of , 1997.
4
&
II
!
22
13
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
BOARD OF COUNTY C(~HISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
D~IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRY~
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LE-G2t SUFFICIENCY:
"bY, ..., ~ : : '~ ~:. '.D , ../,...,
MARJO.i~26 M. STUD£N~ ' '
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTOmN~_y
I~R 1 8 1997
I '.' '_~_. ,....~. _.
RECEIVED
ZONING DEPT.
..... ~ .' '
I.q(£.R~S, Bose, )ucl~ley, .Schuh & Jerallmn, re~t~.se:tir~j ~"
Scrom and kar~ey, petitioned the loa:d of C~ty C~tss ers
property;
gO~, ~I~?0RI 1~ l~ O~AI~ b7 the )o~tg ef Count7 C~ssi~ets '
.... m~E Collier Co.n:7,
.-- SECTION 0~:
located in Section 1, Tc~mshtp )0 South, hnle 21 blt, Collier
florida Is cbinjed t:eu C-1 to "P~" Planned U~it Develop:eno in accocdal
~'ich the )L'9 ~occ:enc attached hereto as [xhibit "A" vh!c~
incorporated herein and ~y reEerence ~de ~art hereo~. ~be
Zonin% Atlas )la? ~u~ber) ~u:ber )0-25-1, as described in Ordinance 82-2,
is hereby acende~ accotdl~[17.
. _ . . r-.. . . .. .-..,. : . .F
.. .--...~-- .] .:~..~'.~:.'--: _- .... :. -..~ .-
z- - .. ' '"': :;?''`:'~¢ r~'.;,>.. --':. ' ""~
$~CTION T~O:
BOMQ O.· C0U1¢~
COLLIZi~ COU'~I'~, Ir'L01~IDA
OT~)Zi~'~ 1<0. 83-65
was ado~:e~ b',- r. he Board of Ccn_-~L-v Cc~rcd. ssicm, e:rs ~ P.~j~lar
.Cession cb.a l~:'.q ~!~ o£ ,~,us:. 1983. '
~.~-T~.?.SS ~ k~-.~ ~d :~e official seal of ~e ~ of C~_~, Cch-.
r£ssicmers of ~.~l~e- .
.... C~, Tlo~, c~ls 17ch ~y o~:. 1983.
~is ~r'~c~qce fi!e~,~h the
Secretary of S:a:e's office
22nd day of Au~., 1983
acknowledg~r~n: of ~t fil~
Clerk of.Cou~:s ~.d Clerk
Lx officio :o ~card of
Counk'y. Cc~x[sslor'.ers
DEV£LOPI,[NT
FOR
~':ST?I £~' PLAZA
Prepared
Euckley, Schuh & Jernigan,'%nc.
~ap~es, F]orfda
'" Date Issued:
Date Approved By CAPC:
" . . o,t, ^~,~ved ,~. BCC:.',
...,-: -,. --;.. . . .. . ;; _ . .....'- -'.~,~.~_-[,,~y,,;~_~.,~ ~
· -:~V~ :: ~.~; · ..... ....-~.'~:-.-" ./~:~-. c:~=:~~~~m:
.~ ....~ .....~:~-- ......,, . '~~..
S~CTIO~; Il:
$£CTI0:; III:
S£CT!O~I IV:
TABL£ OF CONTENTS
CC.~;;':~CIAL O[¥[LC~.'.:[NT R£GUlJ, TIO:;$
DE'IF. L C2:.;i liT CC:.:;.;i
£XXIBiTS
1.1
LEGAL OESCR~T]O:: O? THE PUD PARCEL ..
Al] of the $o,':h ~ of the I~ortheast ~ of the ~orth~est ~ of Sec:~on
e,en.s an. res~.~ct~ons of record; cont~ntng 20.37 ~c~es
less.
Also ~no~n ~s !~s:'~fe:~ PIzza, as recorded In Plat Boot 13,
of t~e P~](c ~tc:r~s eF Collier Coun:~,
SEC?IO~i Il: CC~ERCIAL OEV£LOP~EHT R[GULAT)OI~$
2.1 PURP¢$E
2.2
The purpose cf this secttc~ is to set forth the regulations for the
Cevelop~e~: cf t~e ;roposed 20.37 acre Planne: Unit Development known
as gestvfe~
PER~ZTTED USES A~;~ STRUCTURES, SUB~£CT TO S~TE PLAH R£VZ£V
~o building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered
or used, or lan: cr ~ater used, in whole or in part for other than
the following:
· 2.2.a. Per~!tte~ Principal Uses And Structures:
Art Studios and Art Supply stores
A:tc=obile pert stores
4. ~ar~er end beauty shops
S.
Blueprint and engineertn supply
6. Business and professfona~ shops/
offices (including retatl)~
7. Cemeteries end Heusoleums (human or pet)
8. Churches or other places of worship
9. Civic end cultural activities
lO. Clothing stores
12. Colleges, universities, schools en~ other educational fa-
cilities
12. Confectionery and candy stores
13. Delicatessens
14. ~rug stores
15. £1ectr(cal supply stores
16. Financial institutions
17. Florist shops
lB. Foot ~arkets
]g. Funeral ho~es
~0. GarUen supply stores
~l. Gift shops
22. Gout=et shops
2~. Her:~are
24. Ee~lth food stores
25. High technology precision manu'ect r .
is of a smell nature ~hf~h'~*-: --~ ~ng us~s where the Proc
~ ~vc~ .u~ generate o:or, noise, (
which is detectable from off the premises; e.g. optical, c
tel, hear(ag aids, medical instruments, computer components
otc.
g6. Hobby supply stores
27. Ice cream shops
2,2.b.
~. In:ertor ~ecoratfng Showrooms
2~. Je~'elry s~ores
La~ora:¢r~es, provided that:
a) ~lo c~or, noise, chenfcal discharge, etc.,
iron off the premises Ire generateR;
b) AIl ~'ork is done vlthln enclosed structures; and
c) Ho product fs manufactured or sold, except tnclden'
to develop~nt activities
3~. ~e~fca~ clinics
32. ~e~fcal ~a~oratorfes
33. F~e¢fcal offices (For human care)
~<. ~or~gage brokers
~. ~u$tc stores
35. Office su~;~y stores/
37. Patn~ and wallpaper stores (retail)
~8. Pe: stores (no outside kenneling)
3~. Photographic equipment and suppl~ stores
~0. £ea~ estate offices
~1. Repair shops (radio, television, sma~] i~plfance, shoes
an~ other, items of I small size or nature)
~2. £esearch, design and develop~nt Icttvtttes (high techn{
provided that:
a) See restrictions for llboratorfe$
~3. Shopping centers {not to exceed ~S,O00 s~. ft.)
~. ~ransporta:~on, comuntcatton and uttltt~y offices {not
~nc]udtng storage of equipment)
4~. Ve:ertnar~ clinics {no outside kenneling)
<~. ~atth and precision fnstru~nt sales end repair
~7. An~ other professional or comerct&~ use ~h~ch t$
tn nature w~th the foregoing uses -hfch the Zoning Olre~
~ete,-n~nes to be comp&ttble in the district.
Pernit~e¢ Accessorz Uses And Structures
Access~r~ uses and structures customart~ associa:ed with th~
~ses permitted in this district.
2.3.a. F:~ninun Lc: Aree: One (~} acre
2.3.b. ~ninun Lot ~tdth: Two hundred (200) feet
~ 2.3.C. F:fnfnun Yard Reoufrement$:
---- 1) Fron~ Yard - Fifty {50) feet
2) S~de Yard - Fifty CSO).feet .
3) Rear Yard - FJf~'(50) reit -
, ., *:.,; :.~,,. , ... ~ :..~'.~ ...-.--, ,. . .... .. :..
._. . . .. ~..
'i
2.4
2.3.d.
~.3.e.
2.3.f,
$ l G:;S
2.4.a.
2.4.c.
2.4.d.
Yaxf~um ~etoht Of Structures: Thirty (30) feet abcve the fi
~ra~e of tn~
~(ni~um floor Area Of Principal Structure: One thc~s~nd (1,~
sq:ere feet per bufi¢ing on ground f)oor.
~"-*- Di
............ stance
sc= cf the het$~ts, ~ichavor is
~ax!=:~ ~efoht: Twenty-five (25) feet.
~f=f=:= Front Se'Jack: .Fifteen ilS) feet,
In¢Ivtdual Business Signs:
l) One wall, m~rKuee or hanging sign per business, (no maxi
height), with an area not more than twenty ~er~ent
the total square footage of the front wall t~
be affixed, with a maximum of 250 square feet.
2) One on-premise sign per lot, with a n~xf~u~ area of one
Cred (100) square feet. F~ximum height, twentz-five (25
Project Identification
l) C=e directory sign located at each ~ain entre=ce,
not r~re than 250 square feet
or
_. C.'.e project si~n lccated at each ~.atn
~.~: ~:re than lO0 square feet.
· ,..h...L.. CFF-S?~EET PAR;<I:,'G /~':D OFF-STREET LOADI,~:G REQUI~E.*:TS
X~ re:air(d by the Zoning Ordinance in effect mt the ti:e of
~ reQu(rud by the ~ontno Crdinance (n effect at the ti~e of a~licattor
As required by the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of appl(catfor.
· ~ b~(1 ding pea'mi ts.
· . and ne(s/hborin9 properties frc~ direct ~lmr ,,-
3.1
3.2
A¢:iltOnli guf¢elfnes which are more strtn~ect than those cc~ta(ne~ tn
Zcntng Cr:f~a::e in effect et the time of application for ~ butl¢in~ per:!
may be es:~:(s~e~ b~ the Ceveloper to ensure maximum consts:~c~ et: con-
ttnufty ~(:~(~ :~e pro, eot SS ~ell es ~tth the Character of t~e surrcundfn,
resiCent~al nefg~rhOod. .
LA?JDSCA?~ ~R ST~P
The Ceveloper will provJCe a landscaped buffer str~p, not less than lOofee~
in ~id:h, ~h~ch ~'~11 achieve eight (8) feet tn hefght~no eu~ ¢~a¢ity
~ct~s cf ~lant~ng, along the ~outhern end eastern properly lines.
£xts~ing vege:a:~¢n ~tll be uttltzed ~herever the re ufr
sanely eet~g ~e:. Ga~s in exi~ttne ve-eta+f ....... ~ , ed ct!torte, ts ~re.
c e-a,~crs a~G..c ~..e southern property line will be top'ante: ~([hc~
ticn et~: [E) ice: fn heic~: an~ 80: opaque. Seedlings which ~fllV~I
the recu~re: cri:er~a ~fth~n I2 ronth& ~ill be utilized elsekhere In
buffer
T~e Cevelo~er ~i~l eliminate the e×tsttng pavement connection of gestvtew
Orive an: C~:a Street. Although the ~estvte~ ~rfve rtg~t-of-~a~ rtl1 con-
:fnma :~rc~ :o Oo~na Street, for possible future re-connection, t~e pave-
~e~: conne::i¢~ ~ be re~ov~ an~ a turn around provided a: t~e eas:erl~
~n~ cf :.'es:','fe~ ~rive, so :ha~ access to ~es:v~e~ Plaza w~11 ee allc~ed fro
shall ',r-v; ...... -- ~. t..e Cou~ .no,near, the ~evelo;er or hfs ~sstgns
· , u ,~ e r~r s.,are cc~trloutlon to~ard the capital cos: Of a
;:~na~ ~: t.~e ~.~:ersec:ton cf Atr~ort-Pullfng Roa~ end ~estvie~ Drive. An~
i~ all Lrcfffc signals sha~l ~o o:.~n~d, eperaCe¢ and mafntatne¢ b~ Collier
3~LDI~i~
£,'=ch ~c::.~ercfal lc: shall be ii~.~it~d to a fifty percent (5¢:) t~ervious
:ensit:,, in a:::r~anc~ with t~e Pre~'fously approved water ~ana;e~ent Cosign
2.6.4. Parcel Use Criteria
The parcel use designations tllustrateU t~ E~hlblt 4.1 which
co~panies this submission, reflect)
in Section 2.2.a. ~.~...e~rmftted u~es s~ect~ii
,.:.~.~.~.~..;..o ·
~. t~' *: ~ ·
! ....... ':~L."-i'" r -
-- i
3.6.b.
Site Plea Review
rior to the issuance of bufldtn~ permits Cot each parcel,
n~IvfUu,1 site plln shmll be submitted to the Zonin Be
for their re¥iev and approval.
mo
PURPOSE A~D
T~e t.~s~er Plan (Ex~b~ 4.1) ~$ a v~su~l representatTon c?
pose~ ~'es~vie~ Plaza co~e~cfal PUD. Thfs plan Js not
re~resen~ t~e ?ina1 deve]o~ent p]~n for ~nd~¥Tdua] lots.
buflding sizes and locatfons, parking lots, etc., will be Xc~ual
by the actual use on each lot an Cete.~ned
plan rev+e~ and ap royal ,+ ,~- ~,?11_be subject to
mfr. P -- ,~ Lame oy ~nnl~.,z__ . ~a sfte
-,~,,~.6,on ~or ~ bu~Idfng per-
:1
.!
~, .-' i :
".'5[ ' ii '
I
",,'**: "'""-2.T.'::: ":'"::::: :-'::~' . .._..
": ~- ,i [
; ' ' ' ~i-.,,, ;..
· i ' °t"~", 'i
! : ....-. : .~1;!. I.,
I,.
'" .. L ....----.~;...~--:i ',L.~...; .... ,: ..... .~'i ;i
~ i.:.,...~::?....' -..t...?.;~ j ]id.: ,.~.~.'_' - . : :tl I .
i !. II ~1 Li,:l
'" .. . i' II . . l:i[~d
-- I' ; : !'1 ~ ~ ~, ' I;.ll-li~ ! I
{. :: ., · .: ilu
" ,.' ~- °. -',, '. . . t..~.'". :' .'-t~..,,~l~',~,'- : .... -'~-~.~'. ' I I~
...:.:~.. :.,~,, ~'~...,.....:..:~ '
~-- :.r.'-~-.')~: L'2'.''['~':SnY'' . ~~ ~:'~ ..-/~ I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPEAL OF INVOICE AND STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT
CASE NO. 61113-079 RECORD O~ER- MATTHEW TAVTIGIAN AND ROWENA
TAVTIGIAN
Board to hear appeal by property owner, Matthew Tavtigi~a~, as prescrib~ by
Ordinance 91-47
CONSIDERATION
15 November 1996
18 November
22 November
27 November
20 December
8 January 1997
8 January
27 January
7 February
24 February
Case Summary for 61113-079
Property found to be violative: acctenulation of prohibited exotics species
Brazilian pepper and Earleaf acacia
Notice of violation mailed, certified, return receipt required pursuant to
Ordinance 91-47, section 15
Notice of violation returned with letter from USA Corp. advising that
property was sold to Matthew and Rowena Tavtigian
Notice of violation mailed, certified, return receipt required pursuant to
Ordinance 91.47, section 15, to Matthew and Rowena Tavligian
Returned to sender by Postal Service after 3 attempts at delivery
Property rechecked and documented as still violative by Code
Enforcement personnel
Telephone contact with property owner attempted - unlisted number
Contract awarded to lowest bidder for abatement
Violation removed at public expense of $225.00
Owner invoiced $325.00 by mail
Mr. Tavtigian contends that he is not responsible for the abatement and administrative costs as he
never received the Notice of Violation letter despite three attempts at delivery by the Postal
Service. A Code Enforcement Investigator also attempted telephone contact only to be advised
by the telephone company that Mr. Tavtigian's telephone number is unlisted. Ordinance 91.47
section 15 requires only that the Notice of Violation be mailed by registered or certified mail,
return receipt requested, and said mailing is deemed personal service upon the property owner.
IEI~MPACT The amount of the assessment is $325.00 representing an administrative
cost of $100.00 and an expenditure of $225.00.
GROWTH MANAGEMJ~NT IMPACT
Not applicable
LMAR 1 8 1997
RECOMMENDATION Because ~e owner was given due and prol:~' notice as prescribed by
Ordinance, the assessment of costs should be supported by the Board. Staffcosts ar~ du~ to the
documentation of the violation, the exl~nse of abatement action, the four inspections of the lot
by Code Enforcement ptwsonnel and the adminisirative and clerical costs associated with the
mailings to the Owner. The Board may wish to consider any e~uating circumstances offc~d
by the l~titioncr in making its decision in this mat~er which have not been put forward to staff.
PP~PARED I~V: ~.
Li~]a P. ~ulliva~ ~
Code Enforcement Director
~RE~TE~'WED BY:
Vincent A. Cautero
Community Dev. And Environmental Svcs.
DATE:
MAR 1 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMb~NDATION TO APPROVE ADVISORY BOARDS
DESIGNATED FOR ANNUAL REVIEW PER ORDINANCE 92-44.
OB~CTIVE: To comply with Ordinance 92-44 which requires the Board of County
Commissioners to review the appointed advisory boards in the years 1993 and 1994 and every 4
years thereafter and approve that they are meeting their obligations.
CONSIDERATIONS: According to Ordinance 92-44, advisory boards must indicate that they
are serving the purpose for which they were created, state whether the board is adequately
serving current community needs, provide a li~ of major accomplishments for the preceding 12-
month period and indicate whether there is any other board or agency serving the same purpose
for which the board was created. Also, the Board of County Commissioners must decide
whether the ordinance creating the advisory board should be amended to allow that board to
more adequately serve the purpose for which it was created. The advisory board mus~ also prove
that membership requirements have been met and/or if they should be modified. The advisory
board must justify the cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the board.
Attached are the requisite reports for the following advisory boards:
Collier County Planning Commission
Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee
Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee
Pocket of Poverty Review Committee
Marco Island Beautification Advisory Committee
Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Committee
Environmental Advisory Board
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County
Board Reports as they are presented
requested.
PR-KPARED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Commissioners approve the Advisory
and review any recommendations for amendments as
Chris ~inelair, Administrative Secretary
.//
Michael A. McNees, Interim County Manager
Date:
Date:
pg._ I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Report to the Board of County Commissioners on the Activities of the Collier
County Planning Commission during calendar year 1996, as required by ordinance
92-44.
As required by Ordinance 92-44, the following is a r~port on the activities of the Collier
County Planning Commission during the Calendar Year 1996.
]~;.]t,~3~tl~ Chapter 125.01 of Florida Statutes provides the County the power to
carry on county government, including specifically the power to prepare and enforce
comprehensive plans for the development of the County, and to establish, coordinate,
and enforce zoning and business regulations as may be necessary to for the protection of
the public. Chapters 163.3174 and 163.3194 provide the authority of the local
government to establish a "local planning agency" and land development r~gula6on
commission. Chapter 67-1246, filed in the Office of the Secretary of State on AugusI 4,
1967, and known as the "special act", specifically provides the County's authority ~o
establish the Planning Commission, and further s,~ forth the functions powers and
duties of the Planning Commission. In general, these include: the review of the County's
Comprehensive Plan and any amendments thereto, culminating in a recommendation to
the Board of County Commissioners; the review of all zoning and land use petitions for
consistency with the County's Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan,
culminating in a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners; to keep the
general public and the Board informed and advised on matters relating to planning; and
to conduct public hearings as required for the drafting, establishment and maintenance of
the comprehensive plan, and other planning and land use related ordinances such as the
Collier County Land Development Code.
Collier County Plannlns Commission 199~
Membership
Russell A. Priddy, Chairman/District 5
Michael A. Davis, DiSmct 3
Donald J. York, SecrctaryfDistricl 2
Russell A. Budd, District 3
Edward J. Oates, Jr., District 4
'Richard Nelson, Dis~ct I
Fred N. Thomas, ,Ir.. Vice-Chair. Dis-o'ic! 5
Michael Pedone, District I (replaced Fredrick Gartz)
Michael J. Bruet, Distric! 2
Collier County Plaanlns Commtsstea
Membership
Michael A. Davi~ Ch~i~
F~ N. ~om~ Vi~hair~i~
Michel J. B~ ~i~
Rus~ll A. Bud~ Di~ 3
~w~d J. O~t~ Jr., Di~ 4
~ch~d Nelmn Di~cl I
Gary Wrage, District 5 (replaced Russell Priddy)
Michael Pedone, Dis~cl I
Donald l. York, District 2
January 9. 1997
~ Ordinance 92.44 requires the following items be specifically addressed
in this report:
1)
Whether the Board is serving the purpose for which it was created;
Over the pas~ year, the Collier County Planning Commission has conducted semi-
monthly meetings, on the first and third Thursday of each month, as well as
several workshops and evening hearings, md has fully served the purpose for
which it was created.
2)
Whether the Board is adequately serving community needs;
The Collier County Planing Commission holds semi-monthly public hearings.
These meetings provide a forum in which any and all interested and/or affected
parties can participate in thc planing process. Several evening workshops and
public hearings were conducted for public participation during the two Land
Development Amendment Cycles conducted during calendar year 1996. The
Planning Commission meetings provide the public with a forum to obtain
information relative to a particular issue, or to express support or opposition to a
particular proposal. In this way, the CCPC is adequately serving the communities
needs.
3)
A list of the Boards major accomplishments for the preceding twelve month
period;
During calendar year 1996 the Collier County Planning Commission held 24
regularly scheduled public hearings, and four evening LDC Amendment
workshops/hearings. The following is a list of the types and numbers of petitions
heard by the CCPC during the past year.
Rczones (straight)
Rczones (PUD)
PUD Amendments
Insubstantial PUD
Change
Conditional Uses
15
15
34 I
Developments of
Regional Impact
Devcl°l~ment Order
Amendments
Comp Plan
Amendments
Boat Dock Petitions
Zoning Variances
PIAR 18 1997 ~
pg.
4)
Additionally, the CC'PC revi~,ed the Marco l~land Ma.~ter Plan; the staff
recommendations for Evaltmtion and Apprai~l Report (EAR); two cycles of LDC
amendments, including a comprehensive review of the County's Landscape Code,
the Architectural and Site Development Standards and Guidelines for Commercial
Buildings and Projects.
Whether there is any other Board or agency, either public or private, which
la servtng or would better serve the purpose for which the Board was
created;
s)
6)
There is no oth~ Board or agency, public or private which serves the function of
the "local phmning agency". Thc Collier County Planning Commission, having
been established pursuant to thc powers granted in the "special act", Chapter 67-
1246, Florida Statutes, functions as the "local planning agency" for Collier
County.
Whether the ordinance creating the Board should be amended to allow the
Board to more adequately serve the purpose for which it was created;
Staff is unaware of any reason or purpose to amend the Ordinance which created
the CCPC. The establishment and purpose, powers and duties, and other specifics
governing the procedures and activities of the CCPC are found in Division 5.2. of
the Collier County Land Development Code, ndopted in October of 1991.
Whether the Board's membership requirements should be modified;
There are tine members appointed to the CC'PC, two members each from
Commission Districts 1, 2, 3 and 5; and one member from Commission District 4.
Members serve staggered four year t~..s There is no reason to modify the
membership requirements of the CCPC.
The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the Board.
The only direct costs associated with the Collier County Planing Commission
areas follows:
Court Report Fees (Official Minutes):
Advertising
Printing and other incidental costs:
$7,500 per year on average*
$25,000 per year on average
$5.000 Per year on average*
$42,500 per year on average*
$%.
Pg.
Jan~y P. !~.97
* These costs are budgeted for in the Planning Department Budget and revenues,
for the most part, are generated fi'om petition application fees to cover these costs.
PREPARED BY:
C'ImRENT PLUG ~AGER
i~/ATE/*/'] ("'
I~VIEWED BY:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN DATE
COLLIER COUNTY PLANING COMMISSION
VINCENT ^. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNI~ DEV. & ENVIRO~AL SRV$. DIV.
1997
MATTHEW HUDSON
321 13TH STREET S.W.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34117
TELEPHONE: 455-5072
January 10, 1997
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tarniarni Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: ~n Gate Estates Land Trust Committee - 1997 Advisory_ Board Revte,::
Dear Commissioners:
This litter is to serve as a report to the Board of Coun'b/Commissioners on the above referenced
Advisory Board.
Ordinance No. 94-40 (approved by the Board of County Commissioners on August 16. 1994)
provided that the "Golden Gate Estates Citizens Advisory Committee" be renamed "G,~.den C-,ate
Estates Land Trust Committee".
The Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee was established pursuant to Ordinance No. 87-
48 for the purposes of aiding and assisting the Board of County Commissioners in can?lng out
the requirements, conditions, and vadous provisions of an Agreement, dated November 15,
1983, (1983 Agreement), between Collier County and Avatar Properties Inc., f/k/a GAC
Properties Inc. The Agreement provided for the dedication of 1,061.5 acres of property to Collier
County. The Agreement outlined certain criteda for which the land and prodeeds from the sale of
the land be utilized.
More specifically:
The property dedicated to Collier County would be used to provide facilities for such
things as recreation, utility and community service for the existing and future residents
and visitom of Collier county, and to provide a source of revenue to fund
improvements within the area known as "Golden Gate Estates" and to provide for the
acquisition of other lands, equipment, and materials for the future construction of
improvements. The 1983 Agreement also required that the la,Us deeded to the
county be used only to provide govemmental facilities for existing and future
residents of Collier County, with all capital improvements to be physically located within
the geographical boundary of the area known as "Golden Gate Estates". In
addition, any proceeds from the sale of dedicated lands are to be utilized for capital
projects, to be located within the area known as "Golden Gate Estates." The
9ovemmental facilities which can be constructed upon said property or with the
proceeds of the sale of the property include fire protection fadlities, police,~adlities,
public sch°°ls' libraries and recreational facilities as well as equipment Ts ~'~ '~1~~
for the operation thereof,
Letter, dated January 10, 1997
Board'of County Commissioners
Page 2 of 3
lands deeded in acoc,-dance with the 1983 Agreement; to propose marketing programs for the
sale of lhcee lands; and set pdontles and monitor expenditures from the trust fund (GAC Land
Trust) established by the Board of County Commissioners wherein revenues from the sale of
property are deposited.
The Committee in Apdl 1992 and again in November 1994 mailed questionnaire~ to each
resident of the Estates to inquire as to government r,c,=ds in the area. It il~ lhe results of these
questionnaires that a~!st the ~ in mcomrT~xling spedflc governmental ~ or
equipment that may be funded by the GAC Land Trust.
Marketing procedures have been formally al)proved by the Board of County ~ and
am being adhered to by the County's Real Property Management Depa~ In addition, the
Committee, from time to time, may direct the Real Property Management Department to place
advertisements or purchase "For Sale" signs which are placed upon selected sites, to enhance
the marketing of any remaining property wtthin the Trust. Asset~ of Ihe GAC Land Trust am
approximately $250,000 in available cash and $1,100,000 in land inventory. Ai~omximate~ 450
acres of land is yet to be utilized or sold.
The Committee in order to monitor revenues and expenditures from the GAC Land Trust reviews
'Schedule of Revenues and Expend~m" forms and "1~alanoe Sheets" prepared by the Real
Property Management Department with the assistance of the Collier County Finance
Department.
'Fha Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee in the past year has recommended, and the
Board of County Commissioners has approved, the following allocation of funds from the GAC
Land Trust:
1. A total of $110,(:X:)0 for the design and construction of EMS Medic #12 located in North
Golden Gate. The fadlity has recently been placed in service.
A total of $49,913.07 to the Big Corfcscmw Fire and Rescue District to provide mobile,
portable and base station radio equipment for the County-wide 800mhz radio system in
order to provide for radio communications necessary to provide efficient fire p,'otec~)n to
the residents of Golden Gate Estates.
3. A total of $30,000 to Collier County for purpose of purchasing children's reference
materials to be housed at the Golden Gate Estates Library.
4. A total of $156,000 to Collier County for purposes of completing the Sherffl's Office
Multipurpose Training Facility. The Fadlity was completed in December 1995. The
Facility is located on a parcel of property which was among the inventory of lands
donated to the County by Avatar. Additional acreage was purchased by the GAC Land
Trust to provide for the expansion of the Facility and adequate buffer.
Olt~r recent projects have included: 1. Providing funds for the design of the Maxlax A~ Has~ _r[E,M,, ~lt,
Community Park located in the Estates and the purchase of land needed for a
2. Providing funds for the design of the Golden Gate Estate Library; and, 3. P '
the purchase of fire protection equipment for the Big Corkscew Island Fire and
LatIer, dated January 10, 1997
Board of County Commissioners
P~Jge 3 of 3
As evidenced above, the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee is adequately serving
current community needs. W'~h the assistance of the Real Property Management Department,
the Cx)tden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee Is best se~ng the purpose for which it was
As C~irman of the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee, I am of the opinion lhat no
amendment to the ordinance which established ~ C-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~Uen Gate Estates Land Trust Commiflee
is necessary at this time.
The cost of maintaining the C-,(~en Gate Estates Land Trust Commtttae is nominal. The only
cost is that of staff time to attend meetings which are held on the fourfh Monday of ev~3f month
at 7:00 p.m. at the C-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~den Gate Estates Ubrary. The meetings do not usually exceed one hour in
I shall be available to present this report and answer any questions you may have. Thank you for
your continued suPixxl of the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee.
Sincerely,
Matthew Hudson, Chairman
Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee
cc: Sandra Taylor, Director, Real Property Management Department
Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee Members
LELY GOLF ESTATES BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Collier County Manager's ~. attention Chris Sinclair
George Pea3on, Chairman, Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee
January 23, 1~7
1. The Board is sen/trig lhe purpose for which It was created. To beautify end maintain the medians in our
MS.T.U. area.
2. We know ~ Board is adequately serving Community needs.
3. Considering a revamp of every median in the subdMsion, our task was a III or IV Phase Construction Project.
1995-96 was Phase III . accomplishing completk)n of St. Andrews Blvd., Valley Stream Circle and
'~ of Pebble Beach Blvd. That in itself'was a considerable feat--considering our limited funds. Also, we ~
successful in obtaining a loan of approximately $50,000 fi.om Collier County to complete our final Phase IV
Project. Construction of Phase IV has started as of this writing. The rerr~inlng section of Peb~e Beach
Blvd., all of Forest Hill Blvd. and 3 cul-de-sacs ~ Amen. We thank the Collier County Comm~ for
granting the loan provision.
4. We know of no other Board or Agency which is serving or would serve our purpose ~
5. Yes, we could amend the Ordinance to facilitate a more exDeditiou.~ procedure to go from planning, bidding
and construction. The present bureaucratic pipeline from department to department is not lime efficterlt and
could be ,,S.1Z.0aZZIJjQ.~
6. No modification necessary.
7. Our members vorunteer their Services. The only direct cost is for secretarial services, which is about $2,000
per year.
ff there are any questions, please contact me at 775-3355.
~ge Pearso~
cc: Commissioner John Non'is
Steve Fabiano, Transportation Services
Members. Lely Go~f Estates Beautification Advisory Committee
Phone (94 !) 643-$330
FAX (941) 643-833!
HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 7, 1997
Chris Sinclair, Administrative Secretary
County Manager's Office
Greg Mihalic, Dir~ctor_~~
Annual Advisory Board Review
The Pocket of Poverty Review Committee was disbanded several years ago after the
expenditure of all monetary funds from the Pocket of Poverty.
lfI can provide any additional information, please let me know.
GM/jcl
cc: Vincent ~.. Cautero, Administrator, Community Dev. & Environmental Svcs.
MEMORANDUM
2 I 1997
TO: Collier County Manager's Office - attention Chris Sinclair
FROM: 011Scholes, Chairman, Marco Island Beautification Advisory
Committee
DATE: January 15, 1997
RE: Annual Advisory Bo·rd Review and Report
In accordance with Ordinance 92-44, the follovlnq addresses the specific Items
to b~ covered in our current report:
I. The Board is serving the purpose for which it vas created -- to beautify
· nd maintain the medians and related matters.
2. We believe the Board Is adequately serving community needs. An article In
the January 1, 1997 "Marco Island Eagle" entitled, "it vas a very wood year" is
attached. The feature photo showed newly planted royal palms by our committee
at the Jolley Bridge Gateway.
3. Coz Boards' accomplishments during the past twelve months, followed ·
hurting yeac in 1995 when our previous maintenance contractor ceased operations
without notice and our medians deteriorated without any care or watering for
months until BCC could provide scant emergency services under the cumbersome
and time consuming County procurement and legal procedures.
In 1996 ve had In place · new, full service landscape contractor, Environmental
Care, Inc., who has responded veil to our needs. With the approval of BCC, ye
purchased a dedicated watering truck which is maintained by County
Transportation Services and ye have full control over our watering operations.
A major project vas replacing lost sod and ney sod has been placed from Jolley
Bridge to the southern end of Collier Boulevard and also along Seavlev Court in
medians about six miles In length. Also while replacing sod on North Collier
Boulevard, plant beds were placed in the medians to add colorful bougainvillea
similar to what had been placed In South Collier Blvd. a fey years earlier.
Finally, we applied for and were granted a U.S. Urban Forestry Dept./Florida
Agriculture Department grant of $9000.00 which paid for 50% of our "Oatevay
Project". The project includes Royal Palms and bougainvillea beds on the
approach to the Island at the Jolley Bridge.
In related areas, the thirteen (13) Historical Markers vhtch our committee
maintains received ney bronze plaqoes and recognition tags to identify the
persons or organizations that maintain them. A brochure is attached which the
Marco Island Chamber o[ Commerce published recently for persons to visit these
marker~. Also, the Chamber ha0 a ney "Harco Cat" plague made at the time the
original artifact came to the Collier Museum a~d it will be placed by us at the
"Welcome to Narco" sign which ye maintain and had refurbished this
Page ?vo
4. We knov of no other board of agency vhlch Is serving or vould serve our
purpose.
5. We see no need to amend the ordinance as ve have latitude under "related
utters." lhen the "Vision Committee. planned a roundabout at Bald ~gle and
Elkcam ye had a landscape plan prepared and proslsed to plant It and ye have
consldezed roadside "green' areas.
$. Our ,embership requirements seems adequate. We have seven (?) ,embers, tvo
at-large and five recommended by major Narco Island Service Associations.
?. Our ,embers volunteer their services. The only direct cost Is for
secretarial services, about $2000 per year.
Our annual expenditures should run in the vicinity of $450,000 per year, about
the amount received in ad valorea taxes. A cop of our latest budget report Is
enclosed, is you can see ve have a higher budget as It Includes reserves and
carry forvarda vhlch ve hope to maintain in the future.
If there are questions please contact ae at 642-6983.
Sincerely,
Oil Scholes
cc:
Commissioner John Norris
Steve Yabiano - Transportation Services
Members - Marco Island Beautiflc~tion ldvi~nry Committee
4/22/1997 11:25 9417754454 CCX.J.~ ~ PAG~ 82
DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
TO:
L~o Och~, Admird~lrmtor
8uppod $el~k:w~ Dhrl~ion
FROM:
Diane B. Fl~gg, Director
Emergency Services Department
DATE: Jerp,~ary 22, 1997
Ochop~,, Fire Control District Aclvtsop/, Committee
advisor7 boards review. Three of the five members of the committee were preee~
arx:l r~aportded to the questions as follows. The advisory committee f~ it w~
set~'ing the purpose for which it was created and was adequately se~ing I~
community's needs. They did not Identify any major accomplishmer~ fO~ the
preceding twelve month period and felt that no other Board or agency could betler
serve Ihe Board's purpose. They felt the ordinance did not require an omc~Klmo~
and the membership requirement should remain the same. The indirect arid direct
cost of maintaining the Board was estimated to be one thousand dollars artnuolly.
Nit. Charlie Reym:~M as Chairman, or his designee, will make the pl'e~a'~etio~ to
Ihe Board of Cour~ Commissioner.
If I may offer any additional information please do not hasitate to contact me.
HAR ! 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Report to the Board of County Commissioners on the Activities of the Collier
County Environmental Advisory Board during calendar year 1996, as reqnired by
ordinance 92-44,
As required by Ordinance 92-44, the following is a report on the activities of the Collier
County Environmental Advisory Board during the Calendar Year 1996.
~.' The Collier County Environmental Advisory Board (EAB) was
established by the Board of County with the adoption of the Collier County Land
Development Code, on October 30, 1991. This action provided for the abolition of the
Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) and the Water Management Advisory Board
(WMAB), effective 180 days after the adoption of the LDC, and created a single Board,
known as the EAB, empowered in an advisory capacity, to perform the functions
previously handled by the EAC and the WMAB. These functions include:
review and recommendations of stipulations which address preservation,
conservation, protection, management and beneficial use of the County's
physical and biological natural resources for selected development orders,
including rezones, including PUD rezones and PUD amendments;
developments of regional impact; conditional uses; preliminary subdivision
plans; and other petitions as may be directed to the EAB by County staff, the
Board, or the provisions of the LDC;
implementation of the provisions of the conservation and coastal management
element of the County's comprehensive plan, during the review process for
development petitions and/or plans;
participation in the review and recommendation process for excavations as set
forth in division 3.5 &the LDC;
assisting in the implementation of any new policies, programs or ordinances
created through the Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board which
deal with conservation, management and protection of air, land, water and
natural resources and environmental quality in Collier County;
providing an initial appeals forum and process to hear disputes between
County staff and applicants concerning land development projects and
recommend proposed stipulations for projects approval or grounds for denial
for Board consideration;
functioning as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) appeal board',
pursuant to division 3.8.
HAR 1 8 1997
January 17. !~97
The EAB consists of seven members, appointed by the Board of County
Commissioners. Current membership, as well as membership during calendar year
1996 is provided in the tables below.
Collier County Environmental Advisory Board CoUier Connty Environmental Advisory Board
199~ Membership 1~gT Membership
Blair Foley, Chairman David Wilkison, Chairman
Bob Gore George Hcrmanson
George Hermanson Paul Hinchcliff
Paul Hinchcliff
Mark Lm'nour~x
Michel Sa.~deh Michel Ss~deh
Christine Srraton Christine Straton
David Wilki~on
Blair Foley
ConsideratioD~; Ordinance 92-44 requires the following items be specifically
addressed in this report:
1) Whether the Board is serving the purpose for which it was created;
Over the past year, the Environmental Advisory Board has conducted monthly
meetings, on the first Wednesday of each month, as well as several workshops,
and has fully served the purpose for which it was created.
2) Whether the Board is adequately serving community needs;
The Environmental Advisory Board holds monthly public heatings. These
meetings provide a forum in which any and all interested and/or affected parties
can participate in the planning process. Additionally, the EAB held several
workshops on various environmental issues, including a review of the proposed
LDC amendments. The Environmental Advisory Board meetings provide the
public with a forum to obtain information relative to a particular environmental or
water management issue, or to express support or opposition to a particular
proposal. In this way, the EAB is adequately serving the communities needs.
3)
A list of the Boards major accomplishments for the preceding twelve month
period;
During calendar year 1996 the EAB 11 regularly scheduled public heatings (one
monthly meeting was not held as there were no scheduled petitions or land use
8 g97
5)
6)
January 22. 1997
item). The following is a list of the types and numbers of petitions heard by the
EAB during the past year.
Rezones (straight) 10 Commercial 2
Excavations
Rezones (PUD) 11 Development Order 2
Amendments
'Preliminary 2 Site Plan Reviews 1
Subdivision Plats
Conditional Uses 4 Other Items 16
4) Whether there is any other Board or agency, either public or private, which is
sera, lng or would better serve the purpose for which the Board was created;
The EAB, as previously stated, provides a public forum for land
development and land use related environmental and water management
issues. In general the EAB is responsible for ensuring that development
proposals are consistent with, and supportive of, the provisions of the
Conservation and Coastal Element of the Comprehensive Plan. In
addition, the EAB may participate in a review and provide implementation
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners, relative to any
proposed programs, policies and ordinances created through EPTAB.
Thus while the duties of the two Boards are in some respects related, the
EAB is more involved with site specific reviews and issues related to
implementation of new policies, programs and ordinances, while EPTAB
is directly involved with the creating and/or reviewing proposed
environmental and natural resource related programs, policies and
ordinances.
Whether the ordinance creating the Board should be amended to
allow the Board to more adequately serve the purpose for which it
was created;
The establishment and purpose, powers and duties, and other specifics governing
the procedures and activities of the EAB are found in Division 5.13. of the Collier
County Land Development Code, adopted in October of 1991. Staff is unaware of
any reason or purpose to amend these provisions.
Whether the Board's membership requirements should be modified;
/(a
January 22, 1997
There are seven members appointed at large to the EAB, serving staggered
four year t~,,s. Members musl demonstrate evidence of expertise in one
or more of the following areas: air quality, biology(including botany,
zoology, ecology, etc.); coastal processes; estuarine processes; hazardous
waste, hydrology, hydraulics, land use law; land use planning; pollution
control; solid waste or stormwater management; w,,ter resources, wildlife
management; or other representative areas deemed appropriate by the
Board such as, but not limited to, a representative of the development
community. There is no specific breakdown as to specific numbers of
appointees which must be representative of any single area of expertise.
There is no reason to modify the memberskip requirements of the EAB.
The cost, both direct and Indirect, of maintaining ~e Board.
The only costs associated with the EAB are those cost related to staff time
dedicated to preparing and presenting reports and agendas to the EAB. These
costs are budgeted for in the Planning Department Budget and revenues generated
fi.om petition application fees and other user fees appear to be sufficient to cover
these costs at this time.
PREPARED BY:
ROI~ERT J. MULHERE, AICP
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
DATE
/~, IEWED BY:
DAVID WILKISON, CHAIRMAN DATE
COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD
DONALD/W. ARNOLD, AICP
PL ~Nr~G SERVICE.S DEPAR,~, ENT DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY DEV. & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVS. DIV.
DA~E
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BOARD AUTHORIZATION TO WAIVE THE COMPETITIVE PROPOSAL PROCESS
AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH HENDERSON,
YOUNG & COMPANY TO PREPARE A CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT
FEE FEASIBILITY STUDY, AN UPDATE OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT
FEE RATE STUDY, AND A CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE RATE
STUDY, IF FEASIBLE
OBJECTIVE: Board authorization to waive the competitive proposal process and ~uthorize st~r
to negotiate a contract with Henderson, Young & Company to prepare a correctional facilities
impact fee feasibility study, an update of the law enforcement impact fee study, and a
correctional facilities impact fee rate study, if feasible.
CONSIDERATIONS: At various points in time, Board discussions have focused on the
implementation ora law enforcement impact fee. On February 4, 1997 during the FY 98 budset
policy discussion, staffsought policy direction from the BCC regarding the implementation ora
law enforcement impact fee. The Board directed staffto pursue immediately the implementation
of a law enforcement impact fee.
The attached scope of work identifies tasks to be performed by Henderson Young & Company.
The scope of work is divided into three (3) distinct components.
The initial component is the preparation of a feasibility study to determine what portion of
correctional facilities expansion (i.e., jail, operational facilities, and work release center) would
be eligible to be funded by impact fees. The outcome &this analysis will give the County the
information with which to make a determination regarding the feasibility &pursuing this
revenue source to assist in offsetting the costs associated with new growth and the resulting
demand for additional correctional facilities. The consultant will provide findings and
recommendations on the feasibility of implementing such an impact fee, including initial
estimated ranges &fee levels and revenues. The estimated cost of performing this feasibility
study, including travel expenses, is $I 1,750.
Assuming positive results from the feasibility study and Board direction to proceed, the second
component involves the preparation ora full scale, legally defensible correctional facilities
impact fee rate study. This rate study will resolve specific issues that are not included in the
scope of the feasibility stud),, including credits for other revenue sources also used by the County
to pay for the capital facilities required by grow'th, and the allocation &costs (based on demand)
to land use types. The estimated cost of performing this correctional facilities impact fee rate
study, including travel expenses, is $40,250.
The final component provides for an update to the 1992 Law Enforcement Impact Fee rate study.
prepared previously by Henderson, Young & Company on the old data. The methodology
described in the August, 1992 study will be updated to apply the research to the c ~lculatjt~El~fl'£M
law enforcement fee. Data will be analyzed to calculate the updated impact fee a d th~lmsults
· ,,,'ill be documented in a new rate study. The estimated cost &updating the law aforcement
impact fee rate study, including travel expenses, is 543,500. M~ 1 8 ~?
Staff considered soliciting formal proposals for the consultant work described herein. Any delay
in implementing the prospective impact fees would reduce impact fee revenue collections in FY
98. D~e to time constraints regarding this issue, coupled with the consultant's previous work
experience with Collier County in this area, a waiver of the competitive selection process is
recommended by staff.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of peneorming this feasibility study, including travel
expenses, is $11,750. The estimated cost of performing this correctional facilities impact fee rate
study, including travel expenses, is $40,250. The estimated cost of updating the law enforcement
impact fee rate study, including travel expenses, is $43,500. The wtal cost of all three studies,
including travel expenses, is S95,$00.
The 1992 Law Enforcement Impact Fee rate study was funded from Community Development
Fund (113) reserves. Another funding option is General Fund reserves. The County Attorney's
Office will be responsible for contract administration and will authorize the payments.
RECOIVffvlENDATION:
i)
2)
3)
Prepared by:
That the Board of County Commissioners:
waive the County's purchasing policy and authorize staff to negotiate a contract between
Collier County and Henderson, Young & Company to perform the scope of work outlined in
this Executive Summary,
authorize the Chairman to sign the contractual agreement upon review and approval by the
County Attorney's Office for legal sufficiency, and
approve all associated budget amendments.
Michael Srnykowski, QMB Dire_c_ctor
Reviewed by:
~eve-CYnell, ~rch~g. Director
Reviewed b
Director
Reviewed by:
David Weigel, Cou~ Anomey
Approved
Michael A. McNees, Interim County Manager
Date:
March 11, 1997
Date:
March 1 I, 1997
Date:
March I1, 1997
Date: ~ - ~3""'~7
March 11, 1997
Date:
March 11, 1997
AGENDA IT, EM
No.
NAR 18 1997
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Feasibility Study
Collier County is interested in analyzing the feasibility of implementing impact fees for the
correctional facilities component (i.e. jail and work-release facilities) of the Sheriff's Office
operations. The outcome of the ,nalysis will give the County the information with which to
make a determination regarding the feasibility of pursuing this revenue source to assist in
offsetting the costs associated with new growth and the resulting demand for additional
correctional facilities. The Consultant will provide findings and recommendations on the
feasibility of implementing such an impact fee, including initial estimated ranges offee levels
and revenues.
The feasibility study will consist oftwo parts:
A. Determination of Availability of Da~, The Consultant will analyze the availability of
correctional facility demand data required to support a rate study. Should this analysis indicate
that impact fees for correctional facilities are feasible, the County may then undertake a full
impact fee development process, including a full scale, legally defensible rate study.
B. Preliminary Estimates of Impact Fee Amounts or Ranges. The fee estimates will be based on
a very simple model based on current costs of facilities to be included in the impact fee
calculations and the County's adopted level of service for correctional facilities (i.e., beds per
capita). The preliminary estimates will not include an analysis of credits for other revenue
sources also used by the County to pay for the capital facilities required by growth. The
preliminary estimates will also not include a detailed impact fee schedule by land use type. The
impact fee revenue projections will be calculated based on the preliminary estimates of fees.
2. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Rate Study
The tasks presented below will produce a full scale, legally defensible rate study rate
documenting an impact fee for the correctional facilities component of the Sheriffs Office
operations. This rate study will resolve specific issues that are not included in the scope ofthe
feasibility study, including credits and the allocation of costs (based on demand) to land use
types.
In the Task descriptions below, references to County departments (i.e., Sheriff, Comprehensive
Planning, or Office of Management and Budget, [OMB]) indicate the County agency that is to
complete the task. References to "Consultant" indicate that Henderson, Young & Company will
complete the task. Ali tas 'k.s involving County departments will be completed with the advice
and guidance of the consultant, who will be available to the appropriate department to explain the
task and suggest procedures for completing it.
A. Select T;,ae Period
1. Determine Specific Time Period (fiscal years or calendar years) to be Cover~
Collection and Analysis (Consultant)
AGENDA ITE~
d by~ta ~' ~' .~.~
NAR 18 1997
Pg. ..~
B. Costs and R,~u~
1. Determine CapiM Costs per Unit (Sheriff and Consultant)
a. Building cost per square toot, including land acquisition
b. Detail cost ofequipment and the estimated useful life of that equipment
2. Research Credits that Reduce Impact Fees (Consultant and OMB)
a. Identify correctional facilities capital improvement expenditures and revenues during
the past 5 riscal years (Consultant and OMB)
b. Provide current taxable value, for residential and non-residential land use types
(Property Appraiser)
c. Assemble inventory of Major Capital Assets (Sheriff) * Number of beds
* Square feet of correctional facilities
C. Correctional Facility Us~e Dar?
1. Create samples of Arrests/Bookings and Sentencing Records (SherifF)
a. Random selection of sample of annual arrests, bookings, etc.
b. Assign appropriate land use (i.e., location of the action for which the arrestfbooking was
made) to any sample item that does not have land use.
2. Prepare Demographic Data (Comprehensive Planning, Property Appraiser)
a. Provide current and projected population (county-wide)
b. Provide current number of dwelling units (county-wide)
c. Provide current square feet of non-residential land uses by type of land uses (county-
wide)
3. Create Summary Repons (Sheriffand Consultant)
a. Aggregate data by land use type
4. Forecast Future Correctional Facilities Population (Sheriff and Consultant)
D. F, stablish Level of Service Standards for Impact Feet(Consultant)
1. Analyze current and/or adopted Level of Service Standards for Correctional Facilities
(Consultant)
E..Cgleulate Impact Fees for Correctional Facilities(Consultant)
1. Forecast Facility Needs
2. Calculate Capital Cost per Dwelling Unit and per Square Foot of Non-Residential
Development
3. Calculate Credits
4. Determine Impact Fees (Costs/DU. or Sq. Ft. minus Credits)
F. Eorecast Future Correctional Facility Impact Fee Reven~e (Consultant)
3. Update of Law Enforcement Impact Fee Rate Study
Henderson, Young & Company (the Consultant) shall perform the services described below in
order to update the 1992 study: Impact Fees for Law Edorcement for Collier County, Florida.
A. ~ Local data will be updated to supply the facts that will be the basis ofthe impact
fee calculations. The following are the primary local data that will be update during the research
phase:
1. Costs and Revenues:
a. Update Capital Costs per Unit (Sheriff and Consultant)
* Detail cost ofequipment and the estimated useful life ofthat equipment
* Vehicle replacement policy
* Salvage value of vehicles
* Building cost per square foot, including land acquisition
* Substations: own, rent, or a combination of both?
b. Research Credits that Reduce Impact Fees
* Identify law enforcement capital improvement expenditures and revenues during the
past $ fiscal years (Consultant and OMB)
* Provide current taxable value, both county-wide and for the unincorporated County,
for residential and non-residential land use types (Property Appraiser)
c. Update Inventory of Major Capital Assets (Sheriff) * Number of vehicles
* Number and square feet of stations and sub-stations
2. Update Incident Data
a. Select Time Period (specific fiscal years or calendar years) to be Covered by Data
Collection and Analysis (Consultant)
b. Update Sample of Calls for Service (CFS) and Investigations (Sheriff)
*Random selection of 10% of annual CFS and Investigations
*Assign land use to any sample item that does not have land use
c. Prepare Demographic Data (Comprehensive Planning, Property Appraiser)
* Provide current and projected population of service areas (i.e., both county-wide and
the unincorporated County)
* Provide current number of dwelling units (both county-wide and the unincorporated
County)
* Provide current square feet on non-residential land uses by type of land uses (both
county*wide and the unincorporated County)
d. Create Summary Reports (Sheriff and Consultant)
*Aggregate data by land use type
AGENDA IT~
No.
HAR 18 1997
Pg. .~
Update Law Enforcement Manpower Analysis and Level of' Service Standards
a. Update Forecast of' Future Calls for Service and Criminal Investigations (Consulant and
Sheriff)
b. Update Number of Sworn O~cers (authorized strength) (Sherif0
c. Update Ot~cer Availability Hours (Shed~and Consulter) *Calculate total o~cer hours per year
* Determine cun'ent oi~cer attrition rate
* Determine current on-duty hours available per of~cer
* Determine officer hour required per call for service and investigation
d. Analyze, and Update if Necessary, the Level of Service Standards for Impact Fees
(Consultant)
* Sheriffs current policy on manpower "availability" (Note: relates to task 3.c. above)
* Sheriffs vehicle assignment policy
* Sheriffs standard (or actual) square feet of station spa~ per officer
B. Analysis and Rate Study U_txlat¢, The methodology described in the August, 1992 study will
be updated to apply the research to the calculation of the law enforcement impact fee.
Specifically, the local data will be audited and analyzed. The data will then be used to calculate
the updated impact fee. Finally, the results will be documented in a new rate study.
AGENDA ITEM
No.~
NAR 18 1997
PROJECT COSTS
Consulting service costs are presented separately for each component or'service: (1) preparing
the feasibility study for a correctional facility impact fee, (2) preparing the correctional facility
impact fee rate study, and (3) updating the law enforcement hnpaa fee rate study. Costs for each
component are presented in two categories: (A) consulting services and (B) travel expenses.
Travel expenses assume 1 trip for the correctional facility feasibility study, 3 trips for the
correctional facility impact fee rate study, and 2 trips for the law enforcement update.
(A)
Consulting Travel Total
Component Services Expenses Cost
1. Feasibility Study of Impact Fee for Con'ectional
Facilities
$ 10,000 $ 1,7S0 $ 11,750
2. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Rate Study
35,OOO 5,250 40,2.S0
3. Update Law Enforcement Impact Fee Rate Study
40,000 3,500 43,SOO
Total
S 85,000 S 10,500 S 9~,fHX)
PROJECT SCHEDULF,
to Weel~
Component
1. Fe~ibility Study of Impact Fee for Cone~ional Con~ 4
Facilities A~v~
2. Co~ectional Faciliti~ ~pact Fee Rate S~dy Nod~ W ~ 18
~ ~te S~
3. Update Law Enforcement Impac~ Fee ~te Study Con.aa ! 6
Approv~
AGENDA
NO.
IqAR 1 8 lgg?
Pi.
Q.~,,d~: To m-appoint 1 member to serve a 3 year term, expiring on March 16, 2000, on
the Coil/er County Public Health Unit Advisory Board.
CONSIDERATIONS: Tkis 7 member board was created on February 12, 1993, by Ordinance
No. 93-2 to provide reports and recommendations to the Board ofCotmty Comm/ssioners
regarding policies, operations, finances ~d services that arc being provided or may need to be
provided by the Collier County Public Health Unit to the citizens of Collier County.
A list of the current membersMp is included in the Backup.
The terms for David E. Brandt (representing Comm/ssion Dis~ct 1) and ~ Lee Montgomery
(representing the At-Large category) expired on M~x:h 16. 1997. A press ~ele~se was/ssued and
resumes were received from the following interested citizem:
Mary Lee Montgomery (re-appt.)
COMMITrEE RECOMMENDATIOn!: The re-appointment of Mary Lee Montgomery..
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
I:LECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment; re-appoint Mary Lee Montgomery for a 3 year term expiring
on March I tS, 2000; and, direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the
appointment.
Prepared By: Sue Filson
Date: March 18, 1997
AGEND6 )..I'EM
no. /,t) ~=~
HAR 18
Collier County Public Health Unit Advisory Board
.,N~amt
.]'ames L. Peacz3,kow~ki
1108 Mom'oe Street
Immokalee, FL 3414:2
District; 5
Category: Commission Di$~ct
David E. Brandt
931 Moon Court
Marco Island, FL 34145
District: I
Category: Commi~ion D~trict
Denise Heiaemana
745 Sbcteenth Avenue, S.
Naples, FL 34102
District: 4
Category: At-Large
Patricia A. Meyer~
4460 7th Avenue, S.W.
Naples, FL 34119
District: 3
Category: Commission District
Charles R.. R~oades
420 Harbour Drive
Naples. FL 34103
District: 4
Category: Commission District
Mary Lee Montgome~
700 Fountainhead Lane
Naples, FL 34103
Dixtrict: 4
Category: At-Large
Ama R. Campbell
103 Clubhouse Lane, #:285
Naples. FL 34105
District: 2
Category: Commission Disa4ct
R~orlt t~hont /ll~pt,ti F.~. Dttte Term
tlome Phone D~teRt-appt 2nd~Date 2nd Ttrm
03/16/93 03/16/96 3 Year~
657-2999 3/23/96 03/16/99 3 Yearn
03/15/94 03/I6/97 3 years
642-0712
4324580 03/16/93 03/16/96 3 Years
262-2568 3/23/96 03/16/99 3 Years
03/16/96 03/16/99 3 Years
353-0580
03/I 6/93 03/16/95 2 Years
263-1610 444495 03/16/98 3 Years
261-8383 03115/94 03116/97 3 Years
261-1864
03/16/93 03/16/95 2 Years
263-17~ 444495 03/16/95 3 Years
AGEND,~ _.I T~M
NAI 18 1997
Pg. ~
Collier County Public Health Unit Advisory Board
Wor~ l~bon~ ~ppt'd ~p~ ~ T~rm
Name ~o~ Phone D~pt
Thi~ 7 member boa~ (1 member from eacl~ of~e $ County ~ i:3~tric~, and 2 at4arge
member~) was created on 02/12J93 by Ord. No. 93-2 to provide ~x3rt= and mc~ns to
the Board of County Commi$$ionem regarding policies, operations, flnanc~ and services that
am being provided or may need to be provided by the Collier County Public Heal~ Unit to the
citizens of Collier County. Terms ar~ 3 years.
$~.~.. Tom Olllff. Public Services Administrator. 774-8488
HAR 18 1997
F~ECEiVED
MAR
!i/'?i~!''~ ~'. ? ~.:. ,~ ~. ~.?. ~ .~ ~!~; iMEMORANDUI~..i ;;¢!' :i:.T?/:.,~?.!i:?~!!?~'.'. ~u,:
q 1997.~
Date: March 3, 1997
To: Sue Filson, BCC Administrative Assistant
From: Thomas W. Olliff, Public Services Administrato~ ~.=~~_
Subi: Health Depa~a~ient Advisory Board
At the last meeting o£ the Public Health Depa~u,ent Advisory Board, there was not a
quorum. However of the four current rnember$, three were present. These rnember~
unanirnousl¥ voted to recommend the reappointment of Ms. Mazy Lee Montgomery a~ a
member of the committee. Because her term will expire before the committee's next
meeting, they asked that you forward their recommendation even though there was not an
official quorum so that Ms. Montgomery might retain her active voting status.
The committee was also encouraged to contact other individuals who might be eligible and
interested in filling the remaining two vacancies which you are currently re-advertising.
Should you have any quest/OhS regarding this, or if I can be of any further assistance, please
do not hesitate to call.
cc.; Ms. Denise Heinemann, Chair;, Health Depa. uiient Advisory Committee
Dr. Charles Konigsberg, Collier County Public Health Director
Public Services Division~O n course for
No. /bY ~ t
"': ~q$~ '1'8 1997
Pg.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 1997
TO: Vinell Hills, Elections Office /.L/~,
FROM: Sue Filson, Administrative Assi
Board of County Commissioners
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissionm's will soon consider the following individuals for
appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Pleas~ let me know if those listed
below are registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT ADVISORY BOARD
Mary Lee Montgomery
4301 Gulf Shore Blvd. No.
Park Plaza, # 1804
Naples, FL 34103
QOMMISSION DISTRICT
¢
Tha,'~ you for your help.
AGENDA
NO · -~_.,~Z~
18 1997
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
February 3, 1997
Tom Olliff, Admini~tor
Public Services Division
Sue Filson, Administrative Assi
Board of County Commissioners ~
Collier County Public Health Unit Advisory Committee
As you know, we currently have 2 vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citize~ interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have atta~h~ the resumes received for your review ms follows:
Mary Lee Montgomery
4301 Gulf Shore Blvd. No.
Park Plaza, #1804
Naples, FL 34103
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation of the advisory committee for appointment and
I will prepar~ an executive summa~ for the Board's consideration Ple~e c~tegortze the
applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774--8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
AG£N~.
MAI{ 18 1997
Pg.
EYE EEN?ER
Mary Lee Mo~lom, etT. M.B.A.
"/IX) Neapolitan Way
Naples, Florida 33940
Office (941) 261-8383
Home (941) 26 I- 1864
Fax (941) 261-8443
January 21, 1997
Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Ms. Filson:
I have enjoyed serving on the Advisory Board for the
Public Health Unit and would like to apply for another three
year term.
Sincerely yours,
Mary Lee Montgomer~.;
Mary Lee Montgomery
Park Plaza, #1804
4301 Guff Shore Blvd. No.
Naples, Flodda 3~48 _¥f/o3
(941) 261-18r~
Fax: (941) 261-2529
Work: Montgomery Eye Center
700 Neapolitan VVay
Naples, Florida ~3940 .~,.//0:5
(941) 261~S3
Fax:. (941) 261-8443.
Bom: Denver, Colorado, Noverrber 4, 1937. lived in Denver dudng entire childhood.
Married: Chades Joseph Montgomery, MD., June 17, 1961
Sons: Jay Edward Montgon'ery, bom November 12, 1967
Mark Thomas Montgomery, bom September 15, 1971
Education:
Kent Denver Country Day ~1 (high school), Engl~, Colorado
~uated Cum Laude 1956
V~lesley College, WeGesley, Massachusetts, 1956-58
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 1958..60, AB degree in
Business Administration. Graduated with honors in the Department of
Business Administration. Alpha Chi Omega Sorodty
Virginia CorrrT~rNvealth University, Master of Science in Business
Administration. Graduated 1971
Several courses ir, ophthalmic medical assisting given by the Joint
Con~ssion on Allied Health Personnel in Ophthalmology
Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., Col~, Ohio, 1960-61, estate planning
Industrial Nucleonics, Colun'bt$, Ohio, 1961-64, ~ to the President
IVliller and Rhodes, Richrr~nd, Virginia, 1964.65, Adrrinistrative AssiSt to
Mont~ Eye C, er~er and Chades J. Montgorrery, M.D., P.A., Naples,
Florida, 1970 to present, Practice Adrrinistmtor
Refi~ as Practice Administrator in 1995 and become Admini~ Cor~ltant
HAR 18 1997'
Mary Lee Mont~, Page 2
Adn'inislrn~ Experience:
Supecvi~ of personnel
Estabiishrmnt of polities and procedures
VVdfing of manuals and development of forr~
Finandal management, inducting long-range planning, budgeting, accounting,
and preparation of tax return
Develocx'nent of pub(ic relations programs and materials
Management of corporate legal and insurance affairs
Designing, setting up, and managing an arrbulatory surgical center
in general, relieving the doctors of all the administrative and business affairs
of the practice of medidne
Business Organizations and Ac~ties:
IV'errt:~ of An'erican Sode~ of Ophthalrric Admini~ators
Lecturer at annual meeting in Seattle, May, 1993, and Boston, Apdl, 1994
Organized and carried out a state-wide, three-year effort to change the
Florida Certificate of N..'--cd Law and Flodda An'bulatory Surgical Center
Ucensure regulation to allow for the licensure and Medicare certification of
physidan's office surgery suites
Consultant and speaker on ophthalrric practice management and physidan-ba~
surgery suites
Outside ActMties and Positions Held:
Hospital Service League, Past President and Treasurer
United Way of Collier County, Past Board Merrt~
Naples Christian Academy, Past Board IV'errber and School Treasurer
Collier Ooun~ Medi~ ,.,~odu~y ~li~:~, Past President and Treasurer,
Ma"rt~ of the Duke University Aiurmi Adnissions Advisory Corrrrittee
Interview for the un~ ail Collier P__.,m.rity students applying for adrrission
and represent Duke University in the Naples area
Sand Dollar Inv~ Club, Treasurer
Zonta Club of Naples
Advisory Board to the Collier County ~ssion for the
Catholic Social Services, Board ~
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO MARCO ISl..AND BEAU'ITFICATION'ADVISOKY
COMMITTEE. ' ' ' ' :'" .... '): .- , "'
.... ' .... ~- .~:-~.,'...'L '.;' ;..... :.:.~... .?i, ....~' ,:-'-. ......,' : .... ' .
OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to serve a 4 year term, expiring on March 1, 2001, on the
Marco Island Beautification Advisory Committee.
CONSIDERATIONS: This 7 member committee advises the Board of County Commissioners
on matters pertaining to the beautification and maintenance of the median strips of boulevards
and certain other public areas on Marco. The Committee shall consist of $ members which
representation shall consist of I member being an individual in good standing with their
organization and recommended for appointment by the President of each of the following Marco
Island community organizations: Marco Island Chamber of Commerce, Marco Island Civic
Association, Marco Association of Condominiums, Marco Island Taxpayers Association, and
Marco Island Woman's Club, and 2 members "At Large", not necessarily associated with any
Marco Island organization. Applicants must reside within the Marco Island Beautification
Taxing District. Terms are 4 years.
A list of the current membership is included in the backup.
The term for Gilmore P. Scholes (At-Large Category) expired on March 1, 1997. A press release
was issued and resumes were received from the following 2 inte~sted citizens:
APPLICANT
DISTRICT
Joseph Kubica I yes
Gilmore P. Scholes (re-appt.)
I yes
CO MMITTI~E RECOMMENDATION: Re-appointment of Gilmore P. Scholes.
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
RECOMME[~FDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment; appoint I member to serve a 4 year term, expiring on March 1,
2001, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson
Date: March 18, 1997
AGENDA )~TEM
No. /~/:5
NAR 18 lgg?
Pg.__ /
Marco
Island Beautification Advisory Committee
fYork Phone Appt'd Exp. Date 7erin
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndF, rpDate 2nd Term
12/19/89 03/0ID0 Months
1/1J/94 03/01/9B 4 Years
J'oArm¢ R. usitzk'y
88! Eubankz Court 842-0488
Marco [sla~td, FL 34145
District: I
Category: Marco Island Taxpayer~' Association
Victoria L. Williams 02f23/93
416 Worthington Strut 394-~494 2/15/94
Marco Island, FL 34145
Ditto'ct: 1
Category: Marco L~land Chamber of Cornmercc
PJchard $. Eggers 02/28/95
520 S. Collier Blvd. The Chal 642-8328
Marco Island, FL 34145
Dlrtrict: 1
CateEory: Marco Island Association of Condos
Delores Bar= 05/21/96
591 Scaview Court, Al09 394-4564
Marco Island, FL 34145
Di~trica. 1
Category: At-Large
lane I-Littler 03/01/88
$14 Nassau Court 394-3728 2/28/95
Marco Island, FL 34145
Dirtrict:
Category: Marco Island Civic Association
Gilmore P. Scholes
1125 Strawberry Court
Marco Island, FL 34145
Dirtrict: 1
Category: At-Large
Margaret ,~. Paulson
990 Cape Marco Drive #I001
Marco Island, FL 34145
District:
Categor~:
642-6983
03/01/94 I Year
03/01/98 4 Years
03/01/99 4 Years
03/01/98 2 Years
03/01/91 4 Years
03/01/99 4 Years
05/18/93 03/01/97 4 Years
11/I4/89 03/01/9I 4 Years
642-$113 2/28/95 03/01/99 4 Years
Marco Island Women's Club
1997
--
Marco Island Beautification Advisory Committee
Name
Work Phone Appt'd Ex~. D~e Term
Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
This 7 member committee was created by Ord. No. 88-28. amended by ~)rd. No. g2-21 to aid and
asai~t the Board of County Commissioners in the bus,ness atTairs of ~e Marco I~land
Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit. and prepares and recommends an Itemized budget
to carry out b~e buslneu of the taxing unit for each flx~al yem'. Irn~e membe~ rnu~t be members
of. and recommended by the Presldent~ of ~e following organization~: Marco laland Chamber of
Commerce. Marco IsLand Civic A~n. Marco Island Taxpayef'l Al,~:x:iatio~, Marco Island
Women's Club and Marco Island Association of Condominiums, and 2 members ere At. Large,
not necessarily a~m~ciated with any Marco Island Organization. Terrn~ are 4 year~.
Staff: Steve Fabiano. Engineer I: 774-8494
Fri~..lent 23. 1996
MAR 1 8 1997
SUBJECT:
DATE: March 4, 1997
TO:
FROM:
Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
Stephen F. Fabiano, Engineer II,L;~ .~
Transportation Department
MARCO ISLAND M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE
At their regularly scheduled meeting on February 4, 1997, the Marco Island
Beautification Advisory Committee voted unanimously to recommend that Gilmore P.
Scholes be re-appointed for an additional term.
Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact
me at 774-8494 ext. 7112.
CC:
David F. Bobanick, Interim Director
Transportation Department
NAR 18 1997
Pg- ~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 1997
TO:
FROM:
Vinell Hills, Election~ Office
Sue Filson, Admini~ative Assist~t
Bo~uxt of County Commissioner~
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointmenta
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for
appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Plea~ let me know if those listed
below are r~gister~d voters in Collier County.
Also, please list thc commission district in which each applicant r~sides.
M.I. BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (~OIvIMISSION DISTRICT
Joseph Kubiea~
4102 Silver O~;s LA~ /
N~ples, FL 34119
Gilmore P. Scholes
1125 Strawberry Court ~
Marco Island, FL 34145
-d-
Thank you for your help.
18 1997
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
February3,1997
Steve Fabiano, Engineer I
Transportation Services t,~'
Sue Filson, Administrative Assistan
Board of County Commissioners
Marco Island Beautification Advisory Committc~
As you know, we curt,tuffy have 1 vacancy on ~c abovc-refcr~nced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Joseph Kubica
4102 Silver Oaks
Naples, FL 34119
Gilmore P. Scholes
1125 Strawberry Court
Marco Island, FL 34145
Please let me know, in writing, the recommcadation ofthe advisory committee for appointment and
I will pr,~par~ an executive smmmu~ for the Board's consideration. Plisse cltegortze the
applicants in areas of experti~. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Nc) o_-~
18 1997
Pg.__ (~-
.?
A.'P Pz. z=. x. ~ '3 ¥//c/.
I~o.._/~
HAR 18
Pg.
OILMOR~ P. SCHOLE$
1125 STRAWB£RRY COURT
January 16, 1997
Mrs. Sue Filson, Adninistrative Assistant
Board of County Connlssioners
Collier County Government Complex
3301 Tanlam[ Trail ~ast
Naples, FL 34112
*'7
Dear Mrs. Filson:
This letter represents an application to serve a second 4-year tern on the
Harco Island Beautification Advisory Committee effective Hatch 1, 1997. The
~olloving Is a brief resome of my background:
. U.S. Navy In WII! 44-46 oetty Officer 3/c in Oceanography
· Allegheny College graduaced 1949 In Liberal Arts
· Oraduate york In personnel, University of Pittsburgh
· Advanced in Personnel Adnlnistratlon over 15 years as College Recruiter,
Employment Hanager, Plant Personnel Manager and International Personnel
Director vith rick Chemical, Western Union an~ Johnson and Johnson.
. Completed career ~or over 20 years vith Sealtest
~oods) as Regional Personnel Director, National Labor Relations Director
and Vice President of Human Resources.
· Have s~rved as:
- Corporate OIvlng Solicitor, Boston United Ray
- Hember of Ney York City [ndustrlal Relations Board
- Member Ney York Personnel Management Association
- Board of Directors member of Oreater PhlladeI@hla
- Chairman of Harco Island Beautification Advisory Committee
- Hember, Harco Island Beach Renou=ishnent Advisory Committee
- Member of M[C& Residents Beach Committee
- Currentiy vidover at a~e &~, tvo [2) children, resident of Harco
Island since I9~9.
If there are any ~uestions, please contact me at 642-6983.
Sincerely,
Gllaore p.
CC .'
Commissioner John Norris
Steve Fablano - Transportalon Services
~enbers, Marco Island Beautification Advisory Co~lttee
No.
IUd 1 8
Pg..
Reappointment of two members to the Collier County Industrial Development
Authority and appointment of an individual to fill an unexpired term.
To adopt a resolution reappointing two members to the Collier County
Industrial Development Authority and appointing a person to fill the
unexpired term of a member who resigned.
CONSIDERATION~
On February 27, 1979, the Board of County Co~nissioners, pursuant to the
authority of Chapter 159, Part III, of the Florida Statutes, adopted
Resolution No. 79-34 creating the Collier County Industrial Development
Authority. This authority is composed of five members who serve
staggered, 4-year terms. Membership on the Authority is governed by
State statute and appointments and reappointments are made by the Board
of County Commissioners.
A letter was received from J.R. Humphrey, Chairman and Susan Pareigis,
Executive Secretary, XDA, dated February 24, 1997 advising that John
Agnelli and Richard Botthof, whose terms have expired, are requesting
reappointment. Donald Berry has resigned following the election of his
wife to the Board, and an appointment to fill the unexpired term needs
to be made. The letter outlines the experience of these applicants.
All applicants are citizens and electors and eligible for reappointment.
FISCAJ~ IMPACT1
None
~OWT~ MANAGE~fENT iMPACT:
None
That the Board of County Commissioners consider the request and reappoint
John Agnelli and Richard Botthof to serve 4 year terms on the Collier
County Industrial Development Authority, appoint Carol E. Girardin to
fill the unexpired term of Donald Berry, and to
resolution.
Collier County Industrial
Development Authori =y
adopt the attached
AGENDA ~TEM
No o.~._~.~
MAR 18 1997
(~,a) ~l- ~?oo
February27,1997
Sue Filson
County Commission Office
Collier County Courthouse, Bldg. F
Naples, FL 34112
RE: Appointments to Industrial Development Authority
Dear Sue:
Enclosed is a letter from J.R. Humphrey and Susan Pareigis, Chairman and Executive
Secretary respectively, of the Industrial Development Authority. We are requesting the
reappointment of two existing members and the appoint of a member to replace a resigned Don
Berry.
We would request that this be placed on an agenda as soon as possible. If this can be handled
as a consent agenda item, we would be appreciative. Otherwise, please let me know and the
Chairman or Executive Secretary will be present at the meeting.
Thanks for your assistance.
CC: J.IL Humphrey
Susan Pareigis
Very maly yours,
Donald A. Pickwonh
itt
MAR 18 1997
J. R. Humphrey
Chairman
Donald Berry
Vici-Chairman
John Agnelll
Collier County Industrial Dtvtlopment Authority
3200 Bailey Lane
Suite 162
Naples, bTorida 34105
February24,1997
Barbara Mlnch
Member
i~chctnt Bo~of
Mtmb~r
Sutan Parelttt
~u~el to Autho~
Honorable Timothy L. Hancock
Chairman, Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Chairman Hancock:
The Industrial Development Authority needs to reappoint r, vo members whose terms have expired
and who wish to be reappointed and to appoint a person to fill the unexpired term of Don Berry, who
resigned upon the election of Barbara to the Commission.
John Agnelli has been a member of the Authority for five years, and presently serves as Secretary
of the Authority. As president of IntellineL Mr. Agnelli brings a valuable perspective as a manufacturer.
Richard Botthof has been a member for four years and. as Southwest Florida Area President of First Union
National Bank, brings valuable banking and lending knowledge to the Authority. Both of these individuals
have valuable experience which will be important to the Authority as it moves into new areas of financing
to assist new and existing business in Collier County.
Carol E. Gira~in h~ agreed to serve the remainder of Don Berry's term. Like Don, Carol is a CPA
and brings that most important expertise to the Authority. As you know, Carol has a long record ofclvic
activities, including the presidency of the Chamber of'Commerce.
A suggested Executive SummmT and a Resolution of Appointment and Re. appointment is attached.
Thank you for your assistance.
Executive Secretm'y
AGENDA Z~E~M
HAI 18 1997
RESOLUTZOr~ g?.
RESOLUTION FOR APPO~E~ A~ R~P~I~
THK COLLIKR COU~ INDU~IAL DK~LOPMK~ A~HORI~
WH ERieS. t~ ~ oFC~nty C~mi~ c~t~ tl~ Colti~ C~ I~N~II ~e~t
Aut~ty by C~n~ R~lut~n No. 79-34 ~ Fe~ 27, fg~: a~
WHER~S. t~ B~ a~int~ ~in indtvlduels as m~ o[t~ Aut~ ~
expi~: a~
WHER~S. ~ ~ hu ~i~ u a ~oft~ Aul~ n~
WHEREAS. I~. ~ d~i~ to a~int ~ml ~ Gi~in Io ~11 l~ u~pi~ t~ or~
B~ a~
NOW. ~EREFOR~ BE IT R~OLV~ BY ~E BOARD OF CO~ COMMISSIONE~
OF COLLIER. CO~. ~ORIDA ~
I. J~n A~lli is ~ ~ lo ~ a I~ wh~h ~11 ~ ~ Fe~ 21. 2~.
R[cha~ ~[ il ~ ~;nt~ m .nta I~ wh~ ~11 ~pim m Fe~ 21,
2001.
3. Carol E. Gimrdln is appolnm:l lo/ill ~,e unexpimd term of D~ld Berry. which letm expi~e~
February 26. 1998.
This Resolmio~ shall caq'~itute a cet'fi fkarm ot'appoinm~em and shall be filed wilh (he C1e~c ol'the
C~uit Court as pmvlded by law.
T~il Resalutkm adopted ifter mock~, seccmd and me,~iCy vote.
DATEI~.
A~:
DWlGIrr F- BROCIC CLERK BOARD OF CO~ COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
David C. Weilel
T~mochy L. Ha,-,~.c,c~ Chaim..aa
MAR 18 1997
~!~.~[_~: To appoint I member to fulfill the remainder ora vacant term, expiring on
December 3 I, 1998, on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
CONSIDERATION~: Representation on this board consists of I m~'mlx-r from the Immo~ee
Commtmity Park District, 1 member from the Marco Island Community Park District, and $
members from the Naples and Urban Area Community Park District. This 7 member board
advises the Board of County Commissioners on matters pertaining to the acquisition,
development and programs involving the County's park facilities. Terms are 4 years..
A list of the current membership is included in the baclaip.
We currently have one vacancy due to the resignation of Patricia Anne Goodnight, representing
the Immokalee Community Park District. A press release was issued and resumes were received
from the following interested citizen:
Ms. Billie Cheney 5
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Billie Cheney
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE
R~COMME~¥DATION_: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment and appoint 1 member to fulfill the rem.,_'nder of the vacant
term. expiring on December 31, 1998, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution
confirming the appointment.
Prepared By: Sue Filson
Date: March 18, 1997
AGENpA
MAR 18 1997
I:'go y/
Namt
Elaine M. Wicks
1400 Pcmpei Lane, U~t #33
Naples, FL 34103
Dixtrict: 4
Cattgory: Urban
Timothy M. Blackford
1348 Michigan Avenue
Naples, FL 34103
D/,rtr/ct: 2
Category: Urban
Gil C. Muellet
541 Blackmom Court
Marco Island, FL 34145
Dl~rlct: 1
Cattgory: Marco Island
Max A. I-Iasc, Ir.
3340 23rd Avenue, $.W.
Naples, FL 34117
Di, rtrict:
Category: ~lrban
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
F/orl~ Phone ,41~pt,d F. xla. Date
ltomt Phone DateRt-appt 2nd~_,TDatt
434-0333 03/13/96 12/31/98
S97-490~ 01/07/93 12731/93
~49-7919 2/15/94 12/31/97
02/I $/94 12/3 !/95
394-9444 11/14795 12/'31/99
02/15/94 12/31/95
4S~2028 1 I/14,n)5 12/31/'99
.ros~ph D. Zak..n 263-aag8 03/23/93 I2/31/94
4841 Shtazxvatet Lane 592-5140 1114/9:5 12/31/98
Naples, FL 34119
District: 5
Category: Urbaa
Patricia Aaae C.,oodnight ::" ' 6~7-.O~ 10/03/95 12/31/98
P.O. Box 5045
L'nmokal¢~, FL 34143
District:
· Cattgory: tmmokalee
Gayla L. Start 3S~ 03/12/96 12131/97
735 98th Avenue, N. $91-49'10
NapIe. s, FL 34108
District: 2
Category: Urban
2nd rertn
3 Years
2 Years
4 Years
2Yeah
4 Years
2Yeah
4 Years
2 Years
4 Years
3 Years
2 Years
AGEN ITEM
MAR 18 1997
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
FF'ork Plton~ Appt'd Exp. Dat~ Term
Name Hornt Pbont DattRt-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term
This 7 member committee was created by Guidelines established on 11/25/75 and confirmed by
Ord. No. 93-81 to advise the Board of County Commisaior~1 on any matters conceming
acquisition, development and programs involving parka and recreation facilities in Collier County.
Membership consists of 1 member from the Immokalee Community Park District, 1 member from
the Marco Island Community Park District, and $ membem from the Naples and Urban Area
Community Park District. Terms am 4 yearn.
Sta~.. Steve 8dnkman, Parks and Ret, marion Dimctoc 353-0404
NAR 18 1997
Pg. ~ _
MEMORANDUM
R v r--,-7,
MAR5 i997
Board of Count'j Com~s~aner$
DATE:
March 5, 1997
TO:
FROM:
Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commission
Murdo Smith, Recreation Manager
Department of Parks and Recreation
Immokal~,,e Representative for
Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
At the regular scheduled meeting of February 26~, 1997 the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board recommended that Ms. Billie Cheney be
appointed as the Immokalee representative. The vote was 6/0.
IfI can be of further assistance please advise.
Patidcia Aane Goodnight
P. O. Box 5396
Immokalee, Florida 3~1~3
941-657-3356
Dear Ms. F[lson,
?er;dour ??,one ~all requestm$ m.,.; :'esi..~ation from the Parks 5oard.
,~,.r<.vy resisn from the said board. I enjoyed represenong my
communi .ty on ?&?..and if I can be of service to my communi~/coun .tv
in the future please iet me know.
Sincerely,
Anne Goodnisht
AGEN~j~
HA~ 18 1997
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 3'anuary 13, 1997
TO: Vinell Hills, Elections Office ~ ,, ..
FROM: Sue Filson, Adminis~tive Assistant ~'/:'"'J ' ;"
Board of County Commissioners '~J' ' ' ' '~": "' "
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioner~ will soon consider the following individu-ls for
appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed
below are registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
PARKS 8: RECREATION ADV BOAR~ COMMISSION DISTRICT
Billie Cheney ~
P.O. Box5021 ~ ~X.. 5'o~ ~ ~
Immokalee, FL 34143
Thank you for your help.
AOEND-R_ ITEM
No.
MAR 18 1997
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
.lanuary 13, 1997
Skip Camp, Parks and Recreation Director/~/~
Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant ~"'~
Board of County Commissioners ~
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Billie Cheney
P.O. Box 5021
Immokalee, FL 34143
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation of the advisory committee for appointment and
I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the
applicants in areas of expertLse. If you have any questions, please c,~ll me at 774-g097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
.Attachments
DA1
TO
FROM:
SUBJECT:
10 JANUARY 1997
S[JE FILSCN. ADMthlISTP,,ATIVE AS$1S'r'ANT, COUNTY MANAGER OFFICE
ANNIE PAPPALARDO, CCPRD RECREATION SUPERVISOR- IMM.
P.A.R.A.B REPRESENTATIVE
R ~lie Chene,/~:3~ ."cntac?.ed m,3 3bout ;:).,3,_.~ibly rep"e~e~tim.3 Immcka!ee ~n ,'he
Pa, ks a~d Recrea:!cn Advisory ~Jc, ar,:. I met Mu Chemey this morning and she seems
'.o .be a very ener.;etic, commuqity orien,.~d and Ano',vledgeable citi:'.en of Immokalee.
She stated 3he has !;veal here forever, and woul~ I;ke very much to serve the
;n~m~kalee community as a P.A.R.A.B. representative, i have included Ms Cheney'$
Pluase feel free ~o cal~ her w~!h ;any questions or concerns that you might have.
AGENO&
No,.
H.AR 18 '1997'
P.O. Box 5021
ImmokalGe, FL 33934
(941) 657-1231
JAN ! 0 1~97
LA~¢GUAGE ARTS TEACHER
· S~S' ·
TEAM LF. AD £ R
l.Tmckale9 :..ti.S...*le $¢h0oi, i.-,,nokalee, Fi::rlda. Augua
e ReFor:~d :o che pz'incipal;
* Ser'-ed ~s ~ c.::~rdina:.~r for an %n~:ruc:i:.nal
e <,u:.ae= '.:::n~cn-c~:lon b~:wean my cern and c:ner
~ .%C','iSCr 'C' %}'~ -.4 : . .
:C ins=r;lc~icnal ica.re, for Dc~'ic~, ,~:~-~,~
Btllie Chenay
P.O. Box 5021
Immok&lee, FL 33934
(941) 657-1231
.qka-.e A.;e, -'nc., !982-1985
O~R A}~D MA/~ER
EDUCATION
, . ,,:~.~.(:,j, . .. . ·
'..' :; i '.'~. -'-i-.7
-.,u... :~ .... .la, 5:-S Geg:'ee, Eiemenca,.-y
AGE~p~A
HAR 18 1967
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
December 19, 1996
IRECEIVE. D
DEC 2 0 1996
-- 3300
NAPLES, FLORIDA 33999
(813) 3530404
A CE:RTIFW. D BLU~ C~ CO~
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
301Tamiami Trail, East
Naples, Florida 34112
Attn: Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative A~sistant
Ref: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Board Member Position
Dear Ms. Filson:
;.
As Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and
in concert with Collier County Ordinance Number 93-
81,Section Four, Paragraph "B", I am requesting that the
Board of County Commissioners appoint a new Board Men, er
replacing Ms. Anne Goodnight. Ms. Goodnight has not
attended the past twelve meetings.
By copy of this letter I am notifying Tom Olliff, Public
Services Administrator as called for within the Ordinance.
Please consider advertising for this posi~ion'~n both the
Hispanic press and radio stations in Immokalee. .-
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact
my office.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Chairman
s and ~reation Advisory Board
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
March 11, 1997
Board of County Commissioners
Timothy L. Hancock, AICP, Cha/rman
Commissioner, District 2
Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management
Attache! to this memorandum is a copy ofa lc~-r da~ March 5, 1997 (received in
this office on March 10) concerning the Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management, a
subcommitte~ of the SW'F.I~PC'
I have placed an item on the Board's agenda for March 18, 1997, to nom/na~ a
representative from Collier County to serve on the £stero Bay Agency on Bay
Management.
TLH:sf
Attachment
Timothy L. Hancock '-
, AICP, Chairman
Commissioner, District 2
HAR 1 8 1997
Sour. hwest Florida Regional Planning Council
March 5, 1997
~980 BaTlin¢ Drive. ,tth Floor. N. Ft. MT~rs, FL 33917-3909 (9~I) 6.56-7720
P.O. Bc~ 34~. N. Ft..',~yers, FL 33918-34,55 SL.~CO~[ 749-7720
FAX 94!-6F~.77~
Commissioner Timothy Hancock, Chairman
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
NAPLES, FL 33962
Re: Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management
Dear Chairman Hancock:
According to the settlement agreement for the completion of permitting for the Florida
Guff Coast University, upon completion of the Arnold Committee Study process, the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) is charged to establish an
Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management (ABM) as a subcommittee of the SWFRPC.
The SWFRPC established the ABM at their December Council meeting and the first
ABM meeting was held on February 28, 1997.
According to drainage basin maps for the Estero Bay watershed, a portion of the
watershed for the bay extends into northern Collier County. As a result, the ABM
requested that an invitation be extended to Collier County to become a voting member
cf fha ABM.
The ABM is to be a non-regulatory advisory body whose directive is to make comments
and recommendations for the management of Estero Bay and its watershed. The ABM
is to collect and maintain data concerning the Estero Bay watershed, and make such
data available to the public.
The ABM is to review and comment upon the South Florida Water Management
District's Estero Bay management and improvement study as it is developed, another
aspect of the settlement agreement. The ABM will review and comment to regulatory
agencies on issues affecting Estero Bay and its watershed. The AB · ......
an annual "State of the Bay' report. "
14AR 181997
Estero Bay ABM
Page 2
ABM membership initially consists of, but is not limited to, Lee County legislative
delegation members who desire to participate, and members from the following: local
Chambers of Commerce, Citizen and Civic Associations, Lee County, the City of Fort
Myers, the Town of Ft. Myers Beach, the SFVVMD, the Department of Environmental
Protection, the FGFVVFC, the FGCU, the SWFRPC, commercial and recreational fishing
interests, environmental and conservation organizations, the Responsible Growth
Management Coalition, the FL Myers Beach Civic Association, Citizens Ass6ciafion of
Bonita Beach, scientists, affected property owners, and the land development
community.
If Collier County would like to be represented on the ABM, please notify me and provide
us with a nominated representative for Council action at your earliest convenience. The
next Council meeting will be held on March 20, 1997, and your representative could be
approved at that meeting if we are notified prior to that date. Additionally, the next
meeting of the Estero Bay ABM is expected to be on April 21, 1997.
If Collier County accepts the invitation to be an ABM member, we will also solicit ABM
members from Collier County business, civic and environmental organizations.
Please call Mr. David Burr, Planning Director, or me, if you have any questions or
require any further information. Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
SOUTHVVEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
;CP
Executive Direo{ror
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVAL OF A BUDGET AMENDMENT USING FUND ltl RESERVES TO PAY
IMPACT FEES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED FOR REIMBURSEMENT
To transfer funds from the unincorporated area General Fund 111 Reserves to pay reimbursable
impact fees for Habitat for Humanity.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On November 24, 1992 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 92-627.
This resolution authorizes the payment of a total of $27,506.64 from ~he unincorporated area
General Fund (111). These funds are required to reimburse Habitat for Humanity for houses that
have been sold to very low income purchases in compliance with the impact fee ordinances that
were in effect at that time. Habitat for Humanity has presented these reimbursements for
collection to the County.
On December 22, 1992 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 92-668.
This resolution authorizes the payment of $39,295.20 in impact fees to be paid from the
unincorporated area General Fund (11 I). These funds will be used to reimburse Habitat for
Humanity when the houses are sold to a very low income purchaser in compliance with the
impact ordinances that were in effect at that time. Habitat for Humanity has presented
reimbursement requests for all but six of these houses.
F___ISCAL IMPACt:
The remaining balance of impact fees requested to be reimbursed is $23,577.12. Funds are
available in MSTD General Fund 111 Reserves and will be ~xartsfe~ to HUI Account No.
138710-883200- Reimbursement of Impact Fees.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPAC'r:
None.
]~ECOM]VI~NDATION:
That the 'Board of County Commhsioners approve a budget amendment appropriating the
$23,577.12 from the MSTD Genexal Fund 111Reserves for the reimbursement of impact fees.,,
AGEND~t ITEM,
18 1997
I
Executive Summary
Budget Amendment for Impact Feea
Page Two
3/5/97
Prepar~ by:
Housing and Urban Improvement
,~/,vexi by:
Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator
Community Dev. And Environmental Svcs.
jd/c/hh
Date
Date
1997
r. XECUTIVE
WATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
NAPLES HERITAGE CLUBHOUSE
OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to
accept the newly-constructed water facilities to serve Naples
Heritage Clubhouse and authorize the recordation of the
appropriate legal documents.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The Developer of Naples Heritage Clubhouse, has constructed
the water facilities within dedicated easements to serve this
development. See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents bare been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County
to accept the water facilities in accordance with County Ordinance
78-10.
3) The water facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Board,
operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division under a
one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer.
4) An on-site inspection of the water facilities has been
conducted by the County. Engineering Inspection section. This
inspection reveals that the water facilities have been constructed
in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) A cash bond in the amount of $2,400.00 has been accepted as
surety.
FISCAL IMPACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee.
After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water
facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
GI~ MANA~NT IMP;%CT: This project has been connected to the
County Regional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not
create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities
available at present.
MAR 1 8 1997
Executive Summary
Naples Heritage Clubhouse
Page Two
R~C~NDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board ef the Collier County Water-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for Naples Heritage
Clubhouse, with the following stipulations:
1) That the Board of County Commissioners accept as surety the
receipt for the cash bond in the amount of $2,400.00.
2) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
3) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
4) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
5) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
6) Receipt of payment of water
bacteriological testing
usage from Utilities for
PREPARED BY:
Shirley ~, E~gineering Technician II
Engineer~t~ng Review Services
Date
REVIE~ P
En~n~ering Review Services Manager
Don~d W. ~nol~7 Ai~ '-- ~ '
1 ing Services partment Director
~tncenf A. Cautero, A~istrator
COMMUNITY DE~LOPMENT mD E~IRO~ENT~ SERVICES
Date
Date
Date
MAR 1 8 1997'
ViCI 'NITY." .,'"MAP
NOT. TO ~ALE
~0. ~
MAR ! 8 1997
County of Collier
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
a3Ol TAMIA~111RNL rr~,~T
~.~0 #: 371~77 0~/~/~7
OEPUTY CLERK
RECEIPT: :L372~73
PAYOR: U S HOMES
OFFICIAL RECEIPT C:~I~: ~00.~
When Validated
DESCRIPTION
0EPOSXTS - COMMUNITY O~-V~-LOP
AMOUNT DUE
REF: NAPLES HERITAGE CLUBHOUSE
000990880
SN
0~: DSC: PROJ[CT REVIEW SF.~,'/'CE2 TOTAL DUE:
2400.00
EXECUTIVE S~Y
WATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
MYSTIC GREENS II
OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to
accept the newly-constructed water facilities to serve Mystic
Greens II and authorize the recordation of the appropriate legal
documents.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The Developer of Mystic Greens II, has constructed the water
facilities within dedicated easements to serve this development.
See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County
to accept the water facilities in accordance with County Ordinance
78-10.
3) The water facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Board,
operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division under a
one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer.
4) An on-site inspection of the water facilities has been
conducted by the County Engineering Inspection section. This
inspection reveals that the water facilities have been constructed
in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) A cash bond in the amount of $1,588.50 has been accepted as
surety.
FISCAL IMPACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee.
After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water
facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project has been connected to the
County Regional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not
create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities
available at present.
MAR 18 1997
Executive Summary
Mystic Greens II
Page Two
P~ECO~NDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for Mystic Greens II, with
the following stipulations:
1) That the Board of County Commissioners accept as surety the
receipt for the cash bond in the amount of $1,588.50.
2) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
3) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
4) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
5) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
6) Receipt of payment
bacteriological testing
of water usage from Utilities for
PREPARED BY:
Sh'irley~.~, Engineering Technician II
Engineer>lng Review Services
Date
REVIEWED BY:
Thomas R. Kuck, P.E.
Engiqee~ing Review Servic~sM~n~
Donald W.'Aznold,-AICP ' '~'~--"--'
Vi6cent A. Cautero, Administrator
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
31 ,1??
Da%e
Dat'~ / ~'~
Date
MAR ! 8 1997
L
lit,l*
PROJECT
LOCATION
LOCATION
MAP
AGEf~
No.
MAR 1 8 1997
Official Receipt- Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR1103 - Official Receipt
ITrans Number I Date I Post Date
2120 2/10/97 11:16:17 AM 1 2/10/97
Payment Slip Nbr
MS 4666
Sub-Div: Mystic Greens II A Condominium
Payor:
Fee Information
Fee Code 1 Description ~GL Account
12BONDI DEPOSITS-COMM DEV (CASH BOND)67000000022011300000
Total
Amount I Waived
91588.5o I
Payment Code
CHECK
Memo:
Payments
IAccount/Check Number
86234264
Amount
$1588.50
Total Cash I ~0'00 t
Total Non-Cash $1588.50
Total Paid I $1588.50 ]
Cashier/location: GARRETT_S I I
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
NAPLES HERITAGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY AND RESTROOM
OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to
accept the newly-constructed water facilities to serve Naples
Heritage Maintenance Facility and Restroom and authorize the
recordation of the appropriate legal documents.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1) The Developer of Naples Heritage Maintenance Facility and
Restroom, has constructed the water facilities within dedicated
easements to serve this development. See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County
to accept the water facilities in accordance with County Ordinance
78-10.
3) The water facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Board,
operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division under a
one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer.
4) An on-site inspection of the water facilities has been
conducted by the County Engineering Inspection section. This
inspection reveals that the water facilities have been constructed
in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6') A cash bond in the amount of $2,400.00 has been accepted as
surety.
FISCAL IMPACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee.
After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water
facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
G7%OWTH F,%/~%f&EMENT IMPACT: This project has been connected to the
County Regional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not
create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities
available at present.
MAR 1 8 '1997
Executive Summary
Naples Heritage Maintenance Facility and Restroom
Page Two
REC~NDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for Naples Heritage
Maintenance Facility and Restroom, with the following
stipulations:
1) That the Board of County Commissioners accept as surety the
receipt for the cash bond in the amount of $2,400.00.
2) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
3) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
4) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
5) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
6) Receipt of payment of water usage from Utilities for
bacteriological testing
PREPARED BY:
ghirley N~fx~ Engineering Technician II
Enginee~g Review Services
Date
Thomas E. Ku¢:k, P.E.
Engineering_.~ ... ~-7-2~-~<'_ '~ k~ ix--~-}[evieW('~' Services ,Mana~_,er/-R.i'~
~nald W'. 'Arnold, -AICP ' "
Pl~Se~ices. ~t Director
Vincent A. Cautero, Adminls~krator
COM/4UNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRON74ENTAL SERVICES
D~te
Date
I~AR 18 1997
S
7
~[ TIONK
8
Zn,-
· .',...'.~. ,,,;' ~;
?../.,.'.;}..
El. GA'..
4.
Io
2
::~;..[ c.. t.Ct¢
SITE
11
17
1S
~[LY '
CC:.J:iTR ¥
CLL:~
20
is RATTLE..<
.'~.
.L£LY, A ~_r
VIC!NITY :i "'
· " '" "'NOT. TO 8OAi. E
.:
15
HAMMOCK ROAD
22
23
MAR 1 8 1997
:1
County of Collier
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BY:
0 E. PUTY CL£RK
OFFICIAL RECEIPT
When Validated ~.2
I~C~:
~ P~ID: '2400.00
~ECEIPT: 1372574 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT OUE
PAYOR: US HOMES OEPOSITS - COMMUNITY OEVELOP 2~CG.C'
NAPLES HERITAGE HAINT RSTRM
000990881
SN
/'/ 9,0uO
~E'T:," 05C: ,:'.~C,.3ECT ";" l
~-_,:-'.-:W SER'¢:.C.:.-! TOTAL D~E: ~4GO.CC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FAT~t ~ND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
TO grant final acceptance of ',Southampton Unit One"
_CONSZDERATIONz
1. On June 12, 1994, the Board of County Commissionere granted
preliminary acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and
eewer improvements in .Southampton Unit One".
2. The roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements not
required by the plat to be maintained by the proJectte
homeowners association will be maintained by the County.
3. The required improvements have been constructed in accordance
with the Land Development Code. The County Development
Services has inspected the improvements and is recommending
final acceptance of the improvements.
4. A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and
approved by the County Attorney's Office. A copy of the
document is attached.
~IS~L IMP~CTg
The roadway, drainage water and sewer improvements not required to
be maintained by the proJectte homeowners association will be
maintained by the County Transportation Department and the County
Utility Divisions. Funds for the routine maintenance and upkeep
will come from the Operations and Maintenance budgets of the
Transportation Services and Utility Divisions.
_GROWTH HAI~(~EMENT IMPACT= None
MAR ! 8 1997
J
Executive Summary
Southampton Unit One
Page 2
~BCOMMENDATIONI
That the Board of County Commissioners grant final acceptance of
the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in "Southampton
Unit One" and release the maintenance security.
1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution
authorizing final acceptance.
2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
PREP~ BY:
John R. Houldsworth, Senior Engineer
Engineering Review
Date
~o~as 'E. Kuck, P.E.
Engineering Review Manager
D~nald W. Arnold
Planning Services Director
;/' ~--
9incen~ A. Cautero, Admi~i~trator
Com~unity Dev. and Env£fonmental Svcs.
C~unity Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
Date '
Date
MAR 1 8 1997'
lJ
TH NA
12
,ES
~3
21
-4
27 216
.6
(c~ 144)
EST.~TE
I KESOLUTION NO.
~ ILESOLUTION AUTHOKIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF
$ THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER
6 IRfl:'ROVEM'E?','TS IN SOUTHA.\fl:'TON UNIT O,"~,
? RELEASE OF ~ MAINTENA.NCE SECURITY, ARiD
$ ACCEPTING THE MAINTENA2~CE RESPONSIBILITY
9 FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER
10 SEV'TER I),~ROVEkO:~-NTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED
i 1 TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS
12 ASSOCIATION.
14
16 WI-HEREAS, the Board of County Comrnlssioner% ot'CoIller County, Florida, on August
1 ? 28, 1992 approved the plat of Southampton Unit One for recording; and
19 WI-IEREAS, lhe developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water
20 and sewer improvements }n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required
21 by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended); and the
22 Utilities Standards tnd Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordlnanee No. 88-76, as amended).
23 and
25 WI-~REAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance ol'lhe roadway, drainage,
26 water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and
27
28 WHEREAS, the Compliance Semites Section of the Development Ser~ice~ Department
29 has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and i.~ recommending
30 acceptance of said Facilities.
31
32 NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOA,t~J~ OF COUN'TY
33 CO~flSSIO,~'$ERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR.IDA, Uut final accel:~tance be granted for
34 tho~ roadway, dra~nase, water and sewer improvements in Soutlumpton Unit One, and authorize
35 the Clerk to release the maintenance security.
36
37 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND Oi~J3ERED that the Cotmty accept the ~ture
38 maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements
39 that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners as~oclatlon.
40
41 This Resol~'tlon adopted after mot;on, second and majority vote favoring ~me.
42
45 DATE: BOARD OF COUNTY CO,M2,,IlSSION'ERS
46 ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
47 DWIGI-IT E. BROCK, CLERK
49 By:
50 TIMOTHY I... HANCOCK, CHAI~\~AN
52
53 Approved as to form a~d legal
54 s~c~ency:
$7 H~idi F. A~hton
A.~istant Collier County Attome/
59
61 ~.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARy
PROVIDE AUTHORIZATION TO OBLIGATE FUNDS FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES TO PERFORM THE SECOND YEAR OF POST-CONSTRUCTION
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY BEACH
RESTORATION PROJECT.
OBJECTIVF,; To obtain authorization to obligate funds for professional services to be
provided by Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., during the second year of the post-
construction monitoring phase for the Collier County Beach Restoration Project.
CONSIDERATIONS; On May 24, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners approved
a Professional Services Agreement with Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. to provide
professional engineering services necessary for completion of the Collier County Beach
Restoration Project. Such included the following phases of work and associated costs:
· Final Design Services - $759,590.00
· Bid Services- $38,200.00
· Construction Services - $580,900.00
· Post- Construction Services - $795,000.00
The approval granted on May 24, 1994, provided authorization to obligate funds for the
final design phase with authorization to obligate funds for subsequent phases to be
requested upon completion of each prior phase of work. In accordance with such
procedure, on April 9, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners provided authorization
to obligate funds for professional services required during the first year of post-
construction monitoring. Pursuant to the current schedule, it is necessary at this time to
initiate the services required during the second year of the post-construction monitoring
phase to enable stipulated permit conditions to be completed in a timely manner.
FISCAL IMPACT;
Cost:
Fund:
Cost Center:
Project Number:
$269,900.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
(195) Tourist Development - 60%.
(110406) Beach Renourishment & Pass Maintenance, Category
80225) County Beach Renoufishment Study.
Pursuant to an application for TDC funding, appropriation of these
funds was approved by the Beach Renourishment/Malntenance
Committee on September 5, 1996, the Tourist Development
Council on October 21, 1996 and the Board of County
Commissioners on November 5, 1996.
GRQWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; None.
No. I,o
Executive Summary
Office of Capital Projects Management
Monitoring for Beach Restoration Project
Page 2
That the Board of County Commi~:
Authorize the obligation of funds in the ~ount of $269,900.00 az
prezented in the attached propo.~l for profe~ional ~rzice~ during the
~x. ond year of the po~-con~rucfion monitoring pha~ of the Collier
County Beach Re~toration Project; and
Pursuant to Article 4, Paragraph 4.3 of the Professional Services
Agreement, approve the current Schedule "B" - Attachment "15", Hourly
Rate Schedule for services to be rendered hereunder.
Harold E Huber, Projec~ Manager III
Office of Capital Projects Management
Adoff'o A.~G~xzalez, P.~EJ, Dirdctor
Office of Capital Projects Management
Rayrr~nd W. Miller, P.E., Interim Administrator
Public Works Division
Date: J' ~' 9"~
Date: 74,/~7
HAR I 8 1997
COASTAL
ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS
INC.
Engineers · Scientists · Surveyors · Pionners · A,o~'oisets
~u~y 8,
Mr. Harry Huber, Project M_nnn~r IH
Cailler County Office of Capital Pro[et'ts Man~ement
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Napi~, Flodda 34112
PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICF. S
COLLIER COUNTY POST CONSTRUCTION MONfTORING
CFC FILE NO. 97.001
Pursuant to our Profc&sloo~ Services Agreement (Purcha.~ Order No. 403221, dated April 17, 1996) to provide
pc~~ serried_'___ for the Collier County Beach Restoration Project, we are pleased to present our
revised Schedt~ B, Attachment C for thc 1997 Monitoring Report and related services.
]~ost-Constructlon Phase
Schedule B - Altachment C
Consultant's Estimate of Additional Services
2.21.3.4
2.213.1 Coordinate Agency Requirements $ 25,000.00
2.213.2 Environmental and Biologic Monitoring $ 75,750.00
Z2133 Survcya
(a) Annual Monitoring
Co) Post-Storm Allowance
D~ign and Coordination of Malatcnance
Activities
sx x50. o
S 45,000.00
TOTAt, $269,900.00
Our ezthnated annual cost for prodding these services will be $'269,900.00. Charge~ for these services will be
billed on a time and reimbursable cost basis, based on the approved Schedule B - Attachment B, attached hereto,
which is made a part of this agreement aa if fully contained herein.
Servlcea beyond the scope presented herein caa be provided as Additional Services and shall be authorized in
writing by you.
We txust this proposal ts responsive to your needs. If you have any questions, plea.se contact our office.
Coastal Division Manager
Attachment: Fee Schedule
MAR I 8 1997
3106 S. HORGESHOE DR. · NAPLES, FLORIDA 33942 · (941) 643-2324 · FAX (941) 643-1143
SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT B
CONSULTANTS EMPLOYEE HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
CEC File No. 97.001
January 1, 1997
ee
Principal Engineer / Scientist / Appraiser
Associate Engineer / Scientist / Appraiser
Contract Manager / Supervisor
Project Engineer / Scientist / Appraiser
Staff Engineer / Scientist / Appraiser
Environmental Specialist
Technician / Designer
20.00
90.00
85.00
75.00
65.00
60.00
55.00
Scientists Include: Geologists * Chemists * Biologists * Hydrologlsts
Draftsman
Research/.,;ststant / Appraisal Assistant / Technical Editor
Lab Techn~ian
Construction Observer
Word Processing / Document / Data Processor
Principal Surveyor and Mapper
Associate Surveyor and Mapper
3-man crew
3-man crew (PSM)
2-man crew
2-man crew (PSM)
Photocopies
Blueprints
Mylars
Mileage
45.00
45.00
40.00
40.00
35.00
75.00
65.00
85.00
95.00
75.00
85.00
.10/each
1.50/each
8.00/each
.25/mile
Hydrographic Survey "Laser Trak'
- Standby "Laser Trak'
DGPS Survey System
- One Week Minimum Lease
Single Frequency Depth Sounder
Thermal Paper
E.D.M.
Microtide Recorder (1 month minimum)
Miniflow Recording Current Meter
Wizard Processing Software
Boat
Off-Road Vehicle ("ATV')
$ 250.O0/day
$ 125.00/day
$ 2,300.00/week $ 7,500.00/month
$ 150.O0/day $ 3,000.00/month
$ 19.00/roll
$ 120.00/day
$ 500.00/month
$ 2,000.O0/month
$ 120.O0/month
$ 250.00/day
$ 50.O0/half~y* $ 120.00/day
(*Minimum)
Reknburseable Ex~ense~ wi~ be billed at cost. Typical reimbursable expenses Include: out-of-town travel made on behalf
of the client relating to permlt~, aerial reconnaissance and photographic expenae~, and prints.
Subcont=cts or Subconsuftants will be administered at cost plus 10%.
Inyo~/r~_ will be provided on a monthly basis. Stalement~ are due and payable upon receipt. If written notice is not
received within thirty days of receipt of invoice, such action will be construed aa acceptance of charges as con'ect and accurate.
" Rate~ on this schedule ara guaranteed for one year from the date shown.
" ~ fee negotiated separately.
MAR I 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER FOR PERFORMANCE OF ADDITIONAL
SERVICES UNDER THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR THE MARCO ISLAND
BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT. , ,.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval for performance of additional services related to the
Marco Island Beach Renourishment project.
(~QNSIDERATIONS: On September 6, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners
approved a Professional Services Agreement with Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc.
to provide professional engineering services related to the Marco Island Beach
Renourishment project. In performance of these services, additional services as provided
for in the Agreement have become necessary to address maintenance activities related to
the project. A description of the additional sevAces and associated costs are as follows:
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
ESTIMATED COST
permit Coordination - Prepare and submit information
and conduct necessary consultations with various State
and Federal regulatory agencies to obtain permits to
renourish the south fill segment on Marco Island.
$10,700.00
Surveys - Provide aerial photography and field surveys
for design purposes, and engineering surveys and staking
to enable contractors to proceed with construction, and
other special field surveys.
S19,000.00
Owner/Committee Coordination - Attend meetings and
provide consultation with the Owner and the Marco
Island Beach Renourishment Advisory Committee to ensure
coordination necessary for successful completion of the project.
TOTAL $34,200.00
Approval of a change order is requested to provide authorization for the additional
services described herein.
MAR I 8 1997
Executive Sumnmry
Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Co~t:
Fu~d:
Cost Center:
$34,200.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
(I 95) Tourist Development - 60%.
(I 10406) Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance -
Catesory "A".
(80218) Marco Island Beach Maintenance
Pursuant to an application t'or TDC funding, appropriafi~ of' these
funds was approved by the Beach R ' ' chance
Committee on Sanuazy 3, 1997, the Tourist Development Council
on Sanuary 21, 1997, and the Board of County Commissioners on
January 28, 1997.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RF.,CObIME~DAT/ON: That the Board of County Commissioners:
Approve the requested change order to the Profe~ional Services Agreement with
Coastal Engineering Consult~s, Inc. for the Marco Island Beach Reno~slnnent
order.
Authorize the Office of Capital Projects Management Director to execute the change
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Harold E. Huber, Project Mana~ III
Ot~ ofCaphal .Pr~ect$ Management
Adolfo ~. 0o~ez, P.~/~ Dir~or
Oi~ofCapital Proj~'~s Management
RaymOnd W. Miller, P.E., Interim Administ~tor
Public Works Division
Date:' ~'S"/'~'7
I I
Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc.
Marco Island Beach Renourishment Advisory Committee
Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee
p a I/exsum~ Iorm~-c.c,b~ 04
NAR 1 8 1997
pCOASTAL
ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS
'-'-" INC
February 1 O, 1997
Mr. Harry E. Huber
Project Manager IH
Office of Capital Projects Management
Collier County Government
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Re:
Proposal for Professional Services
Marco Island Monitoring (P. O. No. 404103)
CEC File No. 96.252 (M1090)
I~ar Harry:
Pursuant to the above referenced agreement, we are pleased to present the following Scope of
Services to assist the County in accomplishment of needed beach renourishment along the south
fill segment of the Marco Island shoreline.
It is understood the Owner requests the following services be provided ~ more fully described in:
Article Two, paragraph 2.3 of the Agreement, including: 2.3.1 - Prepare and submit
information and conduct necessary consultations with various State and Federal ggulatory
agencies to obtain permits to renoudsh the south fill segment on Marco Island.
Article Two, paragraph 2.8 of the Agreement, including: 2.8.1 - Provide aerial photography
and field surveys for design purposes, and engineering surveys and staking to enable contractors
to proceed with construction, and other special field surveys.
Article Two, paragraph 2.10 of the Agreement, including 2.10.1 - Owner and committee
coordination.
Our Estimated Cost for these services is as follows:
2.3. i Permit Coordination $10,700.00
2.8. I Surveys $19,000.00
2. ! 0.1 Owner I Committee Coordination $ 4.500.00
TOTAL Estimate: $ 34,200.00
IHAR 1 8 1997
3106 S. HORSESHOE DRIVE * NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 · (941) 643-2324 * FAX (941) ~:Z43J~3f43 ~'
Mr. Harry Huber
February 10, 1997
Page 2
Charges for the.se services will be billed on a time and reimbursable cost basis, based on the
approved Schedule B - Attachment B, attached hereto, which is made a part of this Agreement as
if fully contained herein.
Services beyond the scope presented herein can be provided as Additional Services and shall be
authorized in writing by you.
We trust this proposal is responsive to your needs. If you have any questions, please contact our
office.
Sincerely,
COASTAL ,ENGI..NyERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Michael T. Poff, P. E.
Manager, Coastal Division
MT?linch
Attachment
HAR 1 8 I997
SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT B
CONSULTANTS EMPLOYEE HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
CEC File No. 96.252
January 1, 1997
ee
Principal Engineer / Scientist I Appraiser
Associate Engineer / Scientist I Appraiser
Contract Manager / Supervisor
Project Engineer / Sclent~ / Appraiser
Staff Engineer / Scientist I Appraiser
Environmental Specialist
Technician / Designer
120.00
90.00
85.00
75.00
65.00
60.00
66.00
Scientists include: Geologists ' Chercists ' Biologists ' Hydrologlstl
Draftsrcan
Research Assistant / Appraisal Assistant / Technical Editor
Lab Technician
Construction Observer
Word Processing / Document / Data Processor
Principal Surveyor and Mapper
Associale Surveyor and Mapper
3-man crew
3-man crew (PSM)
2-rcan crew
2-rcan crew (PSM)
Photocopies
Blueprints
Mylare
Mileage
$ 45.00
$ 45.00
$ 40.00
$ 40.00
$ 35.00
$ 75.00
$ 65.0O
$ 85.00
$ 95.00
S 75.00
S 65.0o
$ .10/each
$ 1.50/each
$ 8.00/each
$ .25/mile
Hydrographic Survey "Laser Trak'
. Standby q. aser Trak'
DGPS Survey Systerc
- One Week Minlrcurc Lease
Single Frequency Depth Sounder
Thermal Paper
E.D.M.
MIcrotide Recorder (1 month minimum)
Minlflow Recording Current Meter
Wlzard Processing Software
Boat
Off-Road Vehicle CATV")
$ 250.00/dey
$ 125.00/day
$ 2,300.00/Week $ 7,500.(XYmonth
$ 150.00/day $ 3,000.00/month
$ 19.00/roll
$ 120.00/day
$ 500.O0/month
$ 2,000.001month
$ 120.00/rconth
$ 250.00/day
$ 50.00/half-day° $ 120.00/day
(*Minimum]
/:t'e/mburseab/e Exvenses will be billed at co~t. Typical relmbumable expenses Include: out-of-town travel made on behalf
cd the client relating to permits, aerial reconnaissance and photographic expenses, and prints.
Subcontracts or Subconsultants will be sdmlnistered at cost plus 10%.
Invoice_ will be provided on a monthly basis. Statements are due and payable upon receipt. If written notice is not
received within thirty days of receipt cd invoice, such action will be construed as acceptance of charges ae correct and accurate.
Rates on this schedule are guaranteed for one year from the date shown. I-
~ fee negotiated separately. I MAR i 8 1997
EXECUTIVE $1~MMARY
APPROVE RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP FOR 1997 IN FLORIDA SHORE
AND BEACH PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION'S "BEACH WATCH"
PROGRAM FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPONSORS OF BEACH AND INLET
PROJECTS.
~.~: To obtain approval for renewal of' membership for 1997 in Florida Shore
and Beach Preservation Association's (FSBPA) "Beach Watch" lobbying program.
CONSIDERATIOn: On September 20, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners
approved an application for membership in the Florida Shore & Beach Preservation
Association (FSBPA) ''Beach Watch" program. The purpose of' this program is to assist
local governments in obtaining state appropriations for their beach and inlet projects. In
this regard, Collier County has and will continue to submit annual requests for inclusion in
the Florida Department of' Environmental Protecnion's legislative budget requests for
beach erosion control projects. Membership in FSBPA's ''Beach Watch" program is
considered a cost effective method of ensuring that the appropriate measures are taken in
this effort. The annual renewal fee is $3,000.00. The Beach Renourishment/Maintenance
Committee has endorsed this recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost: S3,000.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
Fund: (195) Tourist Development - 60%
Cost Center: (i I0406) Beach Renourishment - Category A
Project Number: (80225) Collier County Beach Renourishrnent
Su~cient funds are available in the current budget for this obligation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATIQN_: That the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal of
membership for 1997 in FSBPA's ''Beach Watch" program and authorize payment of' the
annual renewal fee in the amount of $3,000.00.
HAR 8 1997
Renewal of Membership in FSBPA
February 27, 1997
Page 2
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
~ Date: ,:,S. Z 7. (~ 7
Harold E. Huber, Project Manager III
Office of Capital Projects Management
Adolfo A. O~nZalez, P.~_ ~ir~or -'7---'-
O.~ce of Capital Projects Management
P~blic Work~ Divi~io~
cc: Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee
HAR I 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT BID #97-2634 FOR. THE PUR.CHASE OF A
BULLDOZER. FOR. THE STOR2vlWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT.
OBJECTIVE; To re-solicit bids with the intent of clarifying the County's
requirements and enhancing competition.
CONSIDERATIONS:
· A Bulldozer in the 70 horsepower class has been budgeted and is necessazy for the
maintenance and upgrading of the County's stormwater drainage systems.
· Bid invitations were issued to 62 vendors.
· Bids were opened on February 25"' and two (2) bids were received.
· Neither bid fully meets the County's specifications.
· Staffdetermined ag[er the bid opening that horsepower and drive specifications were
misinterpreted causing confusion among the bidders.
For these reasons, staff recommends rejection of the bids received and re-soliciting the
purchase upon clariCying the requirements in question.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None at this time.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners reject the bids
received under Bid # 97-263,~d authorize staff to ,re-bid for a Bulldozer.
SUBMITTED BY: ~4,,~-<.~. ~. ~._~ ~'/. Date: .~'/&/~ ~7
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Doc: ES-O06
Bruce W. McNall, Coordinator
Stormwater Management Dept.
Jol~ I~. Bold[, P.E., P.S.M.
Stormwater Management Director
St~phe~ Y. Ca[~nell, Director
i~h,,..~asing D.e4partrnent
Ray&ond W. Miller, P.E.
Interim Public Works Administrator
Date:
Date:~'/~)
/
HAR 1 8
I TABULATION FOR BE) #97-2634
POSTING DAT~: Feb. 6, 1997
INVITATIONS SENT TO: 62 Vendors
Pa~c I of I
I I I
One (l) New Crawler Bulldozer
Ye~, Make & Model
~,~nu factm'er
Guaranteed lv'~x~um Cost of Repa~
Total Bid - Without Trade In
Trade In: 1979 D-5 CaterpLUer Dozer
Oua'a=tecd Buy Back
TOTAL COS'T
e ivery Time in Calendar Days
r Receipt of Order
Sp¢cificafioo Literature Attache. d?
WaJ'ra~ty Literature Attached?
Name anci Address or
Service Facility
Prompt Payment Terms:
Adde-ds Acknowledged:
(.0 0 days (_0{~ days da)s
~----~s __No ~,~--~s __No YEs __NO
~s _~o ~s __~o _~s __No
__% .days ,% days
Net 15 days Net. ~ days
~yEs ~No ~'/~s NO
W1TNESS:
days
__%T.S __NO
__YES NO
% ....... days
Net -- days
__YES NO YES
Cheryl L. Gentry, Purchasing Technician
~da.vs
Net~ days
.__NO
"No Bids" received from:
MAR I§ I997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE THE CONVEYANCE OF WATER FACILITIES TO FLORIDA
CITIES WATER COMPANY AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS
TERMINATING INTERIM WATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS
Q..l~: That the Board of County Commissioners as the governing body
of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier
County Water-Sewer District approve the conveyance of water facilities to Florida
Cities Water Company and authorize the chairman to execute the agreements
terminating interim water service agreements.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Florida Cities Water Company applied for a territorial expansion of their
Water and Sewer Service Area. On February 24, 1997, the Collier County
Water & Wastewater Authority approved the expansion of Florida Cities
Water Company Water and Sewer Service Area. (See Attachment I)
The Collier County Water-Sewer District had previously accepted a two-inch
(2") potable water main which currently serves David Lawrence Mental
Health Center, Messiah Lutheran Church, and the Tech Foundation (Step by
Step).
On February 7, 1995, the Board approved three agreements between the
Collier County Water-Sewer District and the Florida Cities Water Company
providing for interim water service. These agreements are recorded in the
Public Records of Collier County at O.R. Book 2205, Pages 267 through 275.
On August 3, 1993, the Board approved an agreement between the Collier
County Water-Sewer District, the TECH Foundation, and the David Lawrence
Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. for interim water service. This agreement
is recorded in the Public Records of Collier County at O.1L Book 1852,
Pages 1779 through 1783.
On August 31, 1993, thc TECH Foundation paid a Collier County Water-
Sewer District water system development charge in the amount of $4,500.00.
In addition, on April 26, 1995, the TECH Foundation paid to the County
$1,485.00, which was passed on to Florida Cities Water Company for
payment of water impact fees due to Florida Cities Water Company.
Florida Cities has received all water impact fees that are due to them, either
directly from customers or as a pass through from the County. The County is
not due any water impact fees from Florida Cities Water Company or frown ~~
any customers.
MAR 1 8 1997
Executive Summary - Florida Cities Water Company Proposed Service Expansion
Page 2
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Bill of Sale,
Agreement that Terminates Three Interim Water Service Agreements, and
Agreement That Terminates Interim Water Service Agreement for legal
sufficiency.
FISCAL IMPACT: The five customers being served by the interim agreemefits
are charged for service by passing-through Florida Cities' charges. Allowing
Florida Cities to directly serve these customers will have no revenue impact. (See
Attachment 2)
The cost of the two-inch (2") water main and associated meters were paid by the
customers or Florida Cities and the conveyance of said facilities to Florida Cities
Water Company will have no fiscal impact.
Because the TECH Foundation is to now be served by Florida Cities, the
$4,500.00 Collier County Water-Sewer District water system development charge
that had been previously paid will be refunded. This will necessitate a budget
amendment moving funds in the amount of $4,$00.00 from reserves into the
appropriate budget line item.
Thc recording of the legal documentation in the amount of $75.00 which has been
budgeted in account number 408-210110-649030 will be applicable.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: The Interim Public Works Administrator reconxmend~
that the Board of County Conunisdonen as the governing body of Collier
County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio th~ Governing Board of the Collier County
Water-Sewer District do the following:
1. Approve the conveyance oftho two-inch (2") water line to Florida Cities
Water Company and authorize the Chairman to execute the Bill of Sale.
2. Approve the Agreement that Terminates Interim Water Service Agreement
betw~ the Collier County Water-Sewer District and Florida Cities.
3. Approve thc Agreement that Terminates Interim Water Service Agreement between thc Collier County Water-Sewer District, thc TECH Foundation
and the David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc. I
[ MARl81997
Executive Summary - Florida Cities Water Company Proposed Service Expansion
Page 2
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Bill of Sale,
Agreement that Terminates Three Interim Water Sexvice Agreements, and
Agreement That Terminates Interim Water Service Agreement for legal
sufficiency.
FISCAL IMPACT: The five customers being served by the interim agreements
are charged for service by passing-through Florida Cities' charges. Allowing
Florida Cities to directly serve these customers will have no revenue impact. (See
Attachment 2)
The cost of thc two-inch (2") water main and associated meters were paid by the
customers or Florida Cities and the convc-yancc of said facilities to Florida Cities
Water Company will have no fiscal impact.
Because the TECH Foundation is to now be served by Florida Cities, the
$4,500.00 Collier County Water-Sewer District water system development charge
that had been previously paid will be refunded. This will necessitat~ a budget
amendment moving funds in the amount of $4,500.00 from reserves into the
appropriate budget line item.
The recording of the legal documentation in the amount of $75.00 which has been
budgeted in account number 408-210110-649030 will be applicable.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
~: The Interim Public Works Admini~a~r recommends
that the Board of County Commissioners as the governing body of Collier
Count, Florida, ~ as Ex-Officio th~ Governing Board of the Collier County
Water-Sewer District do the following:
1. Approve the conveyance ofthe two-inch (2") water line to Florida Cities
Water Company and authorize the Chairman to execute the Bill of Sale.
2. Approve thc Agreement that Terminates Interim Water Service Agr~m~t
between the Collier County Water-Sewer District and Florida Cities.
3. Approve the Agreement that Terminates Interim Water Service Agreement
between the Collier County Water-Sewer District, tho TECH Foundation
and the David Lawrence Foundation for Mental Health, Inc.
[ HAR181997
Executive Sununary - Florida Cities Water Company Proposed Service Expansion
Page 3
Approve the refund of $4,500.00 in water impact fees that was paid to the
County by the TECH Foundation.
Approve the Budget Amendment in the amount of $4,500, to be established
from Water Impact Fee Fund 411, to be utilized in refunding the water hnpnct
fee paid by the TECH Foundation.
Authoriz~ the recordation of the Bill of Sale, Agreement that Terminates
Interim Water Service Agreement and Agreement that Terminates Three
Interim Water Service Agreements.
PREPARED BY:
Cindy M. Er~Senior Engineering Technic]an
Edward N.-l~nn, Ope~tions Director
APPROVED BY: ~' '7 ~'7
Raymond'W. Miller, P.E., Interim Public Works Administrator
Attachment 1 - Territorial Expansion Map
Attachment 2 - Customers that will become Florida Cities customers
HAR I 8 1997
ATTACHMENT 1
Proposed ~V:ltc, r and Wnstewnler Terrilorial Exp:~nsion
[:loridn Cilies ~¥al~r (.'Olill)Jlli)'
(for illustration purposes only)
Mao of Florida Cities Existin~ Territory S?~'ed and proposed Expansioo Area1~
! I
LEGEND:
~ Existing Water and Wastewater Territory
Proposed Water and Wastewater Territorial Expansion
Proposed Wastewater Ten'itorial Expansion (not included in water expansion)
J HAR ~ 8
ATTACHNiENT 2
COUNTY CUSTOMERS THAT WILL BECOME
FLORIDA CITIES WATER CUSTOMERS
Jehovah's Witness - 4611 Green Boulevard - exi~ng 5/8" meter
Billing Addreas: Golden Gate Congregation of Jehovah's Witness
P.O. Box 990265
Naple~, FL 34101
David Lawr~ce Centex - 6075 Golden Gate Boulevard - ~xisting 2' rna~er meter
which the Messiah Lutheran Church and the Tech Foundation (Step by Step)
Billing Address: David Lawrence Center
6075 Golden Gate Parkway
Naples, FL 34116
M~iah Lutheran Church - 5800 Golden Gate Boulevard - existing sA" meter
Billing Addreas: M~siah Lutheran Church
P.O. Box 990356
Naples, FL 34101-0356
Tech Foundation
I ½, meter
Billing Address:
(Step by Step) - 5860 Golden Gate Boulevard - misting
Tech Foundation
Step by Step
P.O. Box 9409
Naples, FL 34101
Naples Christian Academy - 3161 Santa Barbara Boulevard - existing 2' meter
Billing Address: Naples Christian Academy
3161 Santa Barbara Boulevard
Naples, FL 34116
MAR ~ 8 1997
AGREEMENT THAT TEILM~qATES ~E
INTERIM WATER SERVICT. AGREEMENTS
TI-~S AGREEM~EN'T, entered into th~s day ot' ,1997. by and
betwee~ BOARD OF COLrNTY COI~ISSIO~,;ERS OF COLLIT, R COUNTY. FLOR[DA u
EX-O~cio ~e Govm, lng Boa;d ot'the Collier County Walet. S~wet Difn~c~ w~th its prLr~
place ofbusineu a~ 3301 Eat Tarniarni Trail, Naples, Fk~rida, 34112 (l~reinaR~ referred to as
"County"), aaxl FLOR.I]3A CITIES WATER COM:PAN~, · Florida Co--on, w~th its
principal place of business at ,1837 Swift Road, Suite 100,~ Saruots, Florida,
342:~7. (hereinafter referred to u "Company").
I. To accomplish tr~uu£er of m'v~ce ~rea from the County to the Company. the
parties hereby terminate the following water ~-r~ice agrocments, all dated £d~us7 7. 1995:
(a) Three paje a~-tment regarding a water ~erv~e meter lecated ou Green
Boulevard, Block 68, Lot 7: one (I) EquiYalent Residenual Connec~on.
Cb) ~ page ag~ecmem regarding a master water service meter located ia the
southwest comer of Block 228 at lhe Intersection of Santa Barbara Bonlevard and GoMen
Gate Parkway: t~iny.two and one.halF(32.5) Equivalent Residential Connect~otu.
(c) Three page agreement regarding a master water servke meter located la Block
269, Lot 10 on Santa Barbara Boulevard: ten (10) Equivalent Residential Cotmect~ons.
2. TIUs a~eement shall be recorded by County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COU.'~rI'Y AND COMPANY have execmed this
A~eement in their respective names by authorized officer~ the day and year IL~ written above.
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock
BOA. RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA., AS EX-
OFFICIO THE GOV~R.~ING BOARD OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER
DISTRICT
B)': By:
Deputy Clerk
Timothy L. Han~k, Chairman
ApproYed as to Form tad Legal Su~cicncy
Thomu C. Palmer !
Assist&m County Atlomcy
AGREEMENT THAT TERMINATES
INTERIM WATER SERVICE AGREEMEN~T
TI~S AGREEIVFE,XFT is entered into this day of .1997. by and
betwee~ BOARD OF COUNTY CO~,~41SSION'ERS OF COLLIZR COUNTY. FLOR/DA as
EX-Or, cio the Govern.in~ Boa'd of the Colliet County Watt. t-St. wet District, wil.b iu principal
place ofbu~ineaa at 3301 East TamiarnJ Trail. Naples, Florida, 34112 (~fcrmd to herein as
"County"), the TECH Foundation (referred ~o herein u "TT. CH~, ~d the Da'4d Lawrence
Foundation for Me-nra] Health. l~c.. a Florida Corporation (referred m be~in aa "TM~.
1. To accomplish transfer of service area ~om the County Io Florida Cities Wmet
Company, the pmies be'r~o terminate the L~TERIM WATER SERVICE ^GILEE]d~'NT entered
into by ali thn~e paz~es hereto on Au~usl 3, 1993, and recorded o~ Au$,usi 5, !g93 si ~a]
Record Book 1852, pages 1779 through 1783, public; rec;c~rda of Col]Jet County.
2. 'f'bJs agreernm! shall be recorded by the County.
IN tA, q'i"N~SS ~'HEREOF, COLLIER COLrNTY, TECI'L and ~ have executed
Otis A~eemen! by t~eir respect~,,'e authorized o~cet~ the day and ye. ar ~ wna~n above.
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock
By:.
Deputy C~rk
,"~'lmess ~ to Tecb
Witness as to Tecb
'6/irness as to FMH
BOARD OF COUNTY CO]~iM~SSlONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORI:DA, AS EX-
OFFICIO THE GOVERNI~rG ~OARD OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY WAT~R-SEW~ER
DISTRICT
By:
Timothy L. Hincock, Ckslruml
TECH FOt:,'N'DATION
,
FOL.'NDATION FOR ~..NTAL HEALTH. INC.
Pre~ident of the Corporation
Approv.ed as to Form Su~cicnc.v
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County Anomey
EXHIBIT "A"
APPROXIMATELY 3.450 LI2VEAR FEET OF A 2" WATER
LINE, COMMENCING AT ~ NORTH FAST CORN'ER OF
SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD AND GOLDEN GATE
PARKWAY, CROSS~G SANTA BAI~BARA BOL'LE%'ARD.
EXTENDING W~ST ALONG TH~ NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, ALONG v, Tn-I
WATER SERVICE M~TF.R$ DESCRII{ED A~ ~
FOLLOWING:
METERS LOCATED ON GOLDEN GATE P.~ICKWAY
TFLAT SERVES THE TECH FOUNDAT10N AND
MESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH.
2. METER LOCATED ON GREEN BOULEVARD. BLOCK
68, LOT 7 THAT SERVES TH~ JEHOVAH'S WITNESS.
IViETER LOCATED IN BLOCK 269. LOT 10 ON SANTA
BARBARA BOL"LEVARD THAT SERV'ES .~.-LPLES
CI. OLISTLAN ACADEM'Y.
MASTER METER LOCATED 12V THE SOL'TH'WrEST
COIL",'ER OF BLOCK 228 AT TH~ INTERSECTION OF
SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD AND GOLDEN GATE
PARKWAY WH]CH SERVES DAVID LAWRENCE
CENTER. MESSIAH LUTHERAN C1R;RCH A.N'D TH~
TECH FOU'N'DATION (STEP BY STEP).
MAR ,B 1997
This msm~em prrp~ by:
CL. xly M. E~
S~or En~.edn~ Tectu~ician
Collier Comity Public Works
3~,O! E~ T~rn~mnJ Trail
N,~les. T~orid~ 34112
(941) 732.2575
BILL OF SALE
TI'OS BILL OF SALE e"ddencing the sale and conveyance of the wmet utitity facilities descnbed
herein is made OU, ~ay of ,1997 by and between the BOARD OF
COUNTY CO~,~OSSIOI'~ERS OF COLLLER COUNTY, FLOILK)A, AS TH~ GOVEILNL~G
BOARD OF COLLAR COUTTTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO ~ GOVERNING BOARD OF
TI'FE COLLFI:R COU'N'~' WATER.SEW'ER DIS'rR]CT, Om't'inaR~ referred to a~
and FLOR.IDA CITI~S WATER COM~PANY, a Florida Corporation. its suttee, sots and
('l~'reinaftet referred to a~ "Buyer").
W1TNESSETH:
That S.~d Seller, for and in consideration of the sum often Doll~-'~ (SIO.O0) ~d o~
valuable consid~atJon to said Seller in h~d p~d by ~e ~id Buy~, ~e ~eipt wh~fis
h~eby ~wl~g~, ~ ~t~, b~g~n~, ~ld. ~f~ ~ ov~ ~ deliv~, ~d b~
~ p~ d~ ~t, b~g~. ~11, ~sf~, ~ ~ ~ deliv~ ~ ~e ~uy~.
Buy~'s succ~ ~d usi~ [o~. ~1 ~ c~ wat~ mili~ f~iliti~ l~ng ~n
follo~ng d~ I~, toge~ wi~ a~t ~t 6~ for ~e
~n~ to ~:
SEE ATTACEED ~lT "A"
~CORPOILATED H~RE~I BY REFERENCE
The Seller, For itself and its successors, hereby covenants to and with the Buyer and its
successors and assigns that it is the lawful owner of the sa~d goods and chattels herein refcrre~ :,:,
as water ufili~, facilities; that said goods and chattels a~e ~ f~om all liens ~ encumbrances:
that ~t has good right, t~lle and authority Io sell same. and that it will warran! and defend the same
against the la~'ful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. Seller and Buyer ate used for
stngulaz or plural, a.s the comext requires.
V, IT'N'ESS WHEREOF. SELLER ha~ caused the~e presents to be executed the date and .year
above written.
ATTEST:
D~'IGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMPUlSION'ERS
COLLn:R CO~, FLOR. I~A, AS
~ GOVERN]NG BODY OF COLLIER
COUNTY AND AS EX-OF~CIO TEE
GOVER..NTNG BOARD OF THE COLLAR
COL,~"FY WATER.SEWER DISTRICT
BY:
TL~OTHY L. HANCOCK.
CHMR.~L~'q
t
AWARD A CONTRACT FOR BID NO. 9%2642, ~ PASS MAINTENANCE
DREDGING TO MASTERS GROUP, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,411.00.
~ To award a contract to dredge approximately 8,000 cubic yards of sand
that has clogged the pass and inner channel leading toward closure of the pass.
~ Sealed bids for Bid No. 97-2642 were opened on February 26,
1997. Advertisement for bids was posted on February 10, 1997. Invitations to bid were
sent to forty-three vendors. A summary of the bids received is as follows:
CONTRACTOR
Masters Group, Inc.
Subaqueous Service, Inc
B. J. Excavating Enterprises, Inc.
Florida Dredge and Dock, Inc
* Corrected Amount
$77,411.00
$89,675.00*
$I10,000.00
$244,500.00
The staff has reviewed the total costs and has found them to be correct as tabulated above.
The engineer's estimated cost of construction was $92,250.00. A thorough review of the
proposals was conducted by the staff and design professional. As a result, based upon
verified experience whh this method of construction, it is recommended that Bid No. 97-
2642 be awarded to Masters Group, Inc., P. O. Box 2725, Clewiston, Florida 33440 in
the amount of $77,411 00 being the lowest qualified and responsive bidder,
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost:
Fund
Cost Center:
Project Number:
$77,411.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97.
(195) Tourist Development - 60%
(110406) Beach Renounshment & Pass Maintenance - Category A
(80222) Clam Pass Inlet Management
Approval of a budget amendment is necessary whereby funds in the
amount of $85,152.00 ($77,411.00 plus 10% contingency) will be
transferred from the reserves of Fund 195 to Account No. 195-
110406-763100-80222 to provide sufficient funds for this
obligation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
MAR 1 8 1997
Executive Surrumry
Clara Pass Maintemmce Dredging
March 3, 1997
Page 2
RECOI~d~IE~A~OH2 That the Board of County Commi~oners:
1. Award a comract for Bid No. 97-2642, Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging to Masters
Group, Inc. in the amount of$77,411.00.
2. Approve the necessary budget amendment.
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the contract.
PREPARED BY:
Harold E. Huber, Project Manager III
Office of Capital Projects Management
Date: 3-')-q'7
Date:.~_~,'
anachraenT
CC~
Steve Camell, Purchasing Department
Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee
Humiston & Moore Engineers
Masters Group, Inc.
MAR 18 1997
WORK ORDER # VC-7?
"General Contractor's Services"
Contract ~95-2334, Dated March 28, 1995
This Work Order is for General Contractor's Services, subject to the terms and conditions of the
Contract referenced above, for work known as:
Golden Gate Community Center Auditorium Renovation
The work is specified in the proposal dated December 18. I~6 from which is attached hereto
and made part of this Work Order. In accordance with terms and conditions of the Agreement
referenced above, Work Order #VC-7_7 is assigned to:
Wm. J. Varien Construction Company
Task
Schedule of Work;
purchase order.
Remodel auditorium including alternates #I..4 per drawings and
specifications by Barany Schmidt & Weaver dated November 27, i996,
and Addendum #1 dated December 11, 1996.
Complete within six weeks; April 7, 1997 to May 16, 1997 of receiving
>Liquidation Damages:
Compensation
$250.00 per day will be ~ssessed for each day Substantial
Completion exceeds that date. Alternates No. ! and No. 3 can
exceed that date to allow equipment / material delivery.
In accordance with Item 3 of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance
with the negotiated lump sum amount provided in the schedule below.
Total Fee $108,000.00
Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service
and charged according to an executed Change Order as enumerated in Exhibit D of the
Agreement.
REVIEWED BY:
>
ATTEST:
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
By:
Date
Deputy Clerk
P~k~; and Recreation
, Director Date
, Department
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Collier County, Florida
By:
Chairm'~
%
Contractor
Work Order # VC-77
Page 2
ATTEST:
(Corporate Secretary)
By:
Typed Name and Title
By:
Signature
(or) witnesses ( 2 )
~- Signature
Approved as to Form and
Legal Su ffici en(~~____~,~,~ ~
Michael W. Pettit
Assistam County Attorney
Signature
(Print Name)
941-775-1178
Fax 941-732-0820
Collier · 122CGA
S.I~. ~
WM
ARIAN CONSTRUCTION CO.
General Contractor
1400 Blue Point Ave. $102
Naples, FL 34112
December 18, 1996
Mr. Brooks Swanson, BSW
c/o Mr. John Dunnuck, Supervisor
Golden Gate Community Center
4701 Golden Gate Park~'ay
Naples, FL 34116
AUDITORIUM REMODEL
Per Drawings and Specifications by Barany Schmitt
& Weaver dated November 27, 1996, and Addendum #1
dated December 11, 1996.
We hereby acknowledge receipt of Addendum #I dated December 11, 1996.
We are pleased to submit the following lump sum base bid to complete the
above referenced project:
Seventy eight thousand three hundred and 00/100 ........ ($75,300.00)
ALT #1: Handicap Lift
At this time we are still researching
cost of this item.
ALT #2: Stage Floor Refinishing
ADD: $1,900.00
ALT #3: Stage Curtains ADD: $ 7,700.00
ALT #4: Under Stage Doors ADD: $ 2,050.00
WM. J.~VARIAN C~NSTRUCTION COMPANY
HAR 1 1997
Pg.
~¢. 19 '.q~ 9:09
941-77~ 1178
Fa~ 941.732-0820
WM
VRIAN CONSTRUCTION CO.
Ge~'~erc~ C~r~troctor
1400 BI~e I:~:~nt Ave. ~1~
I~:x)~es. I:L 34112
December 19, 1~)6
TO: Mr. Brooks Swanson. BSW
Mr. John Dunnuck. Supe~lsor
FROM: Bill Verlan
REt Golden Cate Communi~/Center
Auditorium Remodel
C4:~ler ~
S.R.
As rvque, cd, we have completed our research D,o fnslailfaf a handicap Jilt as
see faith in Ihe specifications for the obove, r~fe~-eaced project.
ALT#i Handicap Lift
ADD: S I ~,OM.O0
If there are an). questions, please coil
BURE?Y
CDNB'I'RUC'I'ION
CDMI=ANY
December 17, 1996
John Dunnick
Barany, Schmitt, Weaver Partners
3050 N. Horseshoe Drive Suite 164
Naples, Florida 34104
RE: GO~DEN GATE C0tlH~Z'~ CENTER
This letter shall serve as our proposal to furnieh labor,
materials, taxes and equipment necessary for the renovation per
your drawing dated 11/27/96 - Page O, Al,A2 and El.
Please feel free to call if you should have any questions.
Respectfully,
~addox
Estimator
JM/j h
proposal\ggcommun.jm
2t44~ $o~'~' ?l,'n~,~, ?'a,~ Sv,te 109 CGC
· :~',~1 $0'~"9s. F~,~ 33923 CGC e031578
VANDERBILT BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
2340 J & C ~everd
N~e~, FL 34109
Tel~d~ (941) 591-09~0
Fa~ (941) 591-8181
December 18, 1996
Bayany Schmitt Weaver
3050 N. Horseshoe Drive
Suite 164
Naples, Florida 34104
Artn: Brooks Swanson
Re: Golden Gate Community Center
Auditorium Renovations
Dear Brooks,
We appreciate you giving Vanderbilt Bay Construction, Inc. the opportunity to supply you
with our quote for Auditorium Renovations for the Golden Gate Community Center per
Bid Notification dated 11/27/96 and plans dated 11/27/96 pages A-l, A-2 and E-l, also
Addendum # I dated 12/I 1/96 as follows:
All necessary labor, material, equipment and supervision to complete the scope of work as
listed per plans and specifications above.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BASE BID ................................. $ ~) -~ ~'c..,. - ·
ADD ALT.#1: HANrDICAP LIFT .................................. $ .-
ADD ALT.#2: STAGE FLOOR ........................................... $ .-~ , '/ :~ t'. : ,
ADD ALT.#3 STAGE CURTAINS: ..................................... $ '! c: :', c ,'
ADD ALT.//4 REPLACE UNDER
STAGE STORAGE
ACCESS DOORS: ..............................
I 1 8 1997
The following c]arific..ttion~ sh~ll become a pM ofour bid ~nd contract:
-VCT over existing flooring with no guerentee of'the substrate.
-No Permits or Fees
-Includes black ceiling tile in lieu ofp~nt over ~ge re'ea.
-Some electrical material will not be avall~ble in the specified time period.
-Hollow metal lead time will require eight (8) weeks a~er approval of'
Shop Drawings.
-Stage curt~n will not be installed in the time period specified.
-Ifaw~ded this contract we will not agree to liquidated dam~es due to short
construction time allowed & ~ome of the specified material. We will make every
effort to complete this project as quickly as possible.
Respec~fi~ily submitted,
President~ ~
D.fB/bmw
/
IlAR 1 8 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AWARD THE CONTRACT TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS AT IMMOKALEE
RECREATION/AQUATIC CENTER TO VANDERBILT BAY CONSTRUCTION
INC.
Objective: To award Work Order #VB 18 (under Contract 95-2334) to Vanderbilt Bay
Construction Inc. for improvements at the Industrial Arts building at Immokalee
Recreation/Aquatic Complex.
Considerations: The Board of County Commissioners approved during the budget
process improvements at the Industrial Arts Building at the Immokalee
Recreation/Aquatic complex. These improvements include relocation of the Fitness
Center, creating an aerobics area and installation of a new entrance to the Fitness Center.
On February 20, 1997 four (4) proposals were received for the improvements, one of
which was a No Bid (attached is a bid tabulation sheet.) The apparent Iow proposal was
submitted by Vanderbilt Bay Construction Inc. with a total price of $121,989. This price
includes renovation of the existing Industrial Arts building and creating a new entry to
the Fitness Center at a base price orS114,849. Alternates to the base bid are as follows:
( 1 ) Paint canopies $1,000.
(2) Provide mirrors in multi-purpose room $1,500.
(3) Relocation of air conditioning condenser unit $2,640.
(4) Clip existing roof fasteners $2,000.
Fiscal Impact: Total project cost is $121,989. Funds to cover the cost of these
improvements are in Fund 306-1563382, Project #80064.
Growth Management: Immokalee Recreation/Aquatic Complex is inventoried in the
County's Growth Management Plan.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners award
the contract for improvements at Immokalee Recreation/Aquatic Complex to Vanderbilt
Bay Construction Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign an agreement with Vanderbilt
Bay Construction Inc. after review and approval by the County Attorney's Office.
Mm'do Smith, Recreation Manager
Department of Parks and Recreation
Date ..~-..~-- ,~
Reviewed .~ ~..~, ~/~ and
Approved by: /~i /~t,f~.Pl~
M~'la ~ey, D~r&t0r' ~
~ent of P~ks ~d ~ation
R ewed anaS e
Approved by:_ .
ct
Department of Purchasing
Reviewed and
Approved by::
Thomas W. Olliff, Administr~
Division of Public Services
Date~'7
FE~. ~20'gTITHU) ]$:12 FAC HGHTIPURCH TEL:l-941-?93-3795 P. 001
February20, 1997
Vmderblh Bay Corm. Inc.
V~an Corm. Co.
SureW Corot Co.
Chris-Tel Cons~. Co
Subject: Immokalee ~m~ss Center Renov~ions.
Bidder Base Bid Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Ah. ~4 To'al
Vanderbilt $114,84900 !,000.00 1,500.00 2,640.00 2,000.00
Surety 116,630.00 3,462.00 1,950.00 3,8~0.00 1,730.00 12~,652
Vari~ 129,500.00 1,850.00 2,150.00 3,520.00 1,800.00
Chris Tel NO BID
Vanderbitt Bay Cortst. appears to have submitted tM low~st proposal. Thank you again for
submirting your proposals. I know that it is time comumiag but i! is necessary to keep the program
in place.
My l~t Fax was in error, the meeting that was canceled was 9AM on Feb. 26~ not Feb. 24~.
~fflacSrognale, Construction ,Manager
~/ Department of Facilities Management
RECOMbI~NDATION TRAT ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE~
ADOPT RESOLUTIONS RECINDING A NO-PARKING ZONE ALONG
COUNTY ROAD 29 IN TRE VICINITY OF OUTDOOR RESORTS,
CIIOKOLOSKEE ISLAND, TO ALLOW OFF-ROAD VEHICLE AND BOAT
TRAILER PARK~G, AND ESTABLISH A LIMITED NO-PARKING ZONE ON
AN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR SAFETY
OILIECTIVE: To reeatablish a parking ~rea ~long C.R. 29 that was traditionally used by
the bo&ting public as a roagside parking area.
CONSIDERATIONS: The County Commission directed staff to hold & public meeting
to discuss the idea of eliminating the no-parking zone that was established near Outdoor
Resorts, Chokoloskee Island on C.R. 29. A meeting was held by the Transportation and
Park's staff at which approximately 25 persons attended. The consensus was unanimous
at the meeting that the best ~lution to the parking problems that exist at this location was
to eliminate the no-parking zone.
The attached resolutions do two things; 1.) Rescind the previous resolution that created
the no-parking zone originally, and 2.) establish a no parking zone only on the narrow east
side of the road adjacent to the bike path, as parking in this area may cause safety
c~ncelTIS.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of this action is negligible as it would only require the
removal of the existing no-parking signs.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
adopt the attached resolutions removing the no-parking zone on the west side of C.R. 29
near Outdoor Resorts, and establishing a no-parking zone on the east side ofthe road near
the bike path.
Prepared and Recommended by: ~~, L~' ~1 _
Tho~n-a~W.'-Olliff, ~:~c Services Administrator
IlAR I 8 1997
RESOLUTION NO. g7-~_._..
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO
PARKING ZONE ALONG A PORTION OF THE COUNTY ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY ON COUNTY ROAD (C,R.) 2g IN THE vICINr'r'Y
OF OUTDOOR RESORTS, CHOKOLOSKEE ISLAND, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 goveml parking In the unlncorlx)ratad
areas of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution supamedes Resolution gl-lg~'
WHEREAS, Section Four of ~aid Ordinance authorizes the Board of County Commlssloner~
to adopt resolutions designating certain areas along County roads as areas In which parking,
standing, or stopping are resfltcted or prohibited; end
WHEREAS, Section Four of Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 further provides thal upon
adoption of a resolution by the Board of County Commissioners, County roads shall be posted with
signs specifying any parking, standing or stopping restrictons or prohibitions; and
WHEREAS. it has been determined to be in the best interests of the County to establish a
no parking zone along a specified section of Counb/road right-of-way on C.R. 29.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: the following specified section of County road fight-of-way
be designated as a 'No Parking' zone and that said road be posted with signs specifying that
parking is prohibited at any time:
'No Parking" to extend from the centerline of the road on the easterly side of C,R.
29 outward for a distance of thirty-five feet (35'); 'No Parking' zone Io start at the
section corner of Sections 25, 30, 31 end 36 (Florida Department of Transportation
Right-of-way Station 33+20) and Io extend a distance of 3,000 feet north (Florida
Department of Transportation Right-of-way Station 63+20) along the centarfine of
C.R. 29, more parliculady described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same.
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Approved as to.form and legal sufficiency:
H~i I~. AShto~ -- --
Assistant County Attorney
RDM/Im/031 lgTno parking zone.doc
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
Agenda Item"
No ,...~
HAR 1 8 1997
Pg. ~ ___,
EXHIBIT "A"
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND
SECTION 30. TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NO PARKING AREA
A parcel of land which ex~ends 35 feet easterly from the following described line:
Commencing et the southwest comer of Section 30, Township 53 South, Range 30 East
and al~o b~ing known Is State of Florida State Road Department Right-Of Way Map
Stat[on 33+20,00. thence along the east line of said Seclion 30 N 0*0Z14'"E I distance
of 300 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence along the same east line of ~ald SecUon
30 N 0'02'14'E es distance of 1134.5~ feet of P.C Station 47+54,5~; thence leaving
said section line along a ~ to the no~lhwest said curve hev~ng I carmel angle of
39'07'59'. · radius of 2292.01 feet, a distance of 15~5,44 feet to Staf.'o~ ~3+20.00 and
the poinl of ending.
Bearings based upon those shown on the F.D.O,T. Right of Way Map,
THIS IS A SKETCH OF
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
PREPARED BY:
TKANS?DRTATION SERVICES DIVISION
COLLIr'~ COUNTY (;OV£RNMENT COMPLEX
3301 Z. T~IA~,I TRAIL
NAPLES, FL 33962
(813) 77&-8260
I FIAR ! 8 l$97
Ft~SOLUTION NO. g7-
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO, gl-lg,
THEREBY RESCINDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO
PAJ~KING ZONE ALONG A PORTION OF THE COUNTY ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY ON COUNTY ROAD (C.R,) 2g IN THE VICINITY
OF O~R RESORTS, CHOKOLOSKEE ISLAND, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 governs parking in I~e unincorporated
ama~ of Co,liar County; and
WHEREAS, SecUon Four of ~aid Ordinance author[zes tim Board of County Commlssionem
to adopt resolutions designating certain areas along County Roads as areas In which parking,
standing, or stopping ara restttcled or prohlbltad; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissionam adopted Resolution No, 91-19 on
January 0, 1991 establishing a 'No Parking' zone along a po~on of C,R. 29 in the vicinity of
Outdoor Resorts, Chokoloskee Island, Collier County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interests of the County to rescind
Resolution No. 91-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA that the following specified section of County road right-of-way
is no longer required to be designated as a 'No Parking* zone for public safety:
1. The centerline of the road both on the weslerly and easterly sides of C.R. 29
outward for a distance of thirty-five feet (35'); 'No Parking' zone to start at the
section corner of Sections 25, 30, 31 and 36 (Florida Department of Transportation
Right-of-way Station 33+20) and to exdend a distance of 3,000 feel north (Florida
Departmenl of Transportation Righl-of-way Station 63+20) along the centerllna of
C.R. 29, more particularly described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
incorporated herein by ret'erence.
2. Resolution No, 91-19 creating the parking prohibition is hereby rescinded,
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same.
DATED:
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Ap~,oved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Hei~h-]:'. A~ht~n
~sis~nt Coun~ Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
ROM/thY031097.~1o Pkg.doc
HAR 1 8 1997
6
'7
i0
II
12
13
RESOLUTION NO, g7~
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO, g1-19,
THEREBY RESCINDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO
PARKING ZONE ALONG A PORTION OF THE COUNTY ROAD
RIGHT-OF. WAY ON COUNTY ROAD (C.R.) 29 IN THE VICINITY
OF OUTDOOR RESORTS, CHOKOLOSKEE ISLAND. COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 80-47 governs parking in the unincorporated
areas of Collier County; and
t4 WHEREAS, Section Four of said Ordinance authorizes the Board of County Commissioners
tS to adopt resolutions designating certain areas along County Roads as areas In which parking,
16 slanding, o¢ stopping are restricted or prohibited; and
I? WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 91-19 on
II January B, 1991 establishing a 'No Parking' zone along a portion of C.R. 29 in the vicinity of
19 Outdoor Resorts, Chokoloskee Island, Collier County, Florida; and
2o WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interests of Ihe County to rescind
21 Resolution No. 91-19.
22
23
24
26
27
29
30
34
36
3?
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4'7
48
49
~0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the follow~ng specified section of County road right.of-way
is no longer required to be designated as a 'No Parking" zone for public safety:
1. The centerline of' the road both On Ihe westerly and easterly sides of C.R. 29
outwarc~ for a distance of thirly-five feet (35'); 'No Parking" zone IO Start at the
section corner of Seclions 25.30, 31 and 36 (Florida Department of Trensporletion
Right-of-way Station 33+20) and to extend a distance of 3,000 feet north (Florida
Department of Transportation Right-of-way Station 63~20) along the centerline of
C.R. 29, more parlicularly described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
2. Resolution No, 91-19 creating the parking prohibition is hereby rescinded.
This Resolulion adopted after molion, second, and majority vote favoring same,
DATED:
Al-rEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
Approved as to form and legal Sufficiency:
Heidi F. Ashl~n "' t~ _
Assistant County Attorney
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
RDM~lm/031097/No Pkg.doc
0 EXHIBIT "A" N~G
N :>5, TOWNSHIP 55 SOUT. H, RA E :>9 EAST AND
SECTION 50, TOWNSHIP 55 SOUTH, RANGE 50 EAST
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
#0 PAF~.INC
alao ~lug ~o~ aa S~a~e ol ~loriga Irate loag ~epa~aea~ ~l[h~-of-Wa2 Nap
1Ali.~t tee~ ~o P.e. ~{a~lon 17+}i.~$1 ~hemae leaving said sa~lom liaa alii a ~u~ve to
~he uor~es~ aal~ cu~e havinl a central angle ot ~°02,~9', a radius o~ 22~2.01 ~ee~,
a dis~m~e ol l~t}.ll Iee~ ~o [~ion t3+20.00 and ~he pola~ of
THIS IS A SKETCH OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
P~£PA?,.£D BY:
TRANSPOETATION $£RV1C£$ DIVISION
~LLI~ COUNTY ~O~E~N~ENT COHPLEX
~301 [. T~I~I ~AIL
NAPL~, FL
\
\
MAI 1 8 199
Pg.~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, RENEW ITS APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS AND APPRAISAL FIRMS FOR
APPRAISAL A]qD VALUATION SERVICES WHICH THE COUNTY MAY REQUIRE FROM
TIM]E TO TIME, PURSUANT TO RFP-95-2338.
O.~[F~13~: To approve for County use a number of at:~raisers and appraisal firms which have been
pre-qualified by staff through a review of their qualifications, their appraisal r~ports, and through a
review of references and clients.
CONSIDERATION: Real estate appraisers are frequently needed by Collier County to estimate the
compensation due to property owners as a result of the necessary acquisition of their properties (or
portions thereof) for the construction of public improvement projects such as roads, canals, parks, utility
facilities, etc. Real estate appraisers may also be needed by the County to appraise the value of County-
owned property which is being contemplated for tale or lease. Assignments can range f~nn simple one-
dimensional appraisals using only the comparable sales approach, to complex befor~and-after appraisal
problems involving severance damages and estimates of cure, where only a portion of an improved
property is being acquired by the County.
The purpose of pre-qualifying and approving a list of real estate appraisers is to reduce the time and
expense associated with the solicitation of bids for each appraisal assignment while still securing the
highest quality servic~ available. Each time appraisal services are required by Collier County, all ofthe
appraisers and/or appraisal firms from the appropriate list, and only those appraisers, are invited to submit
proposals for service fees and time of delivery. Since implemented in 1987, this pr~ess has promoted
competition, and has ensured that Collier County secures high quality services at reasonable prices.
Through a review of the responses to RFP 95-2338 (sample appraisal reports and various qualifications
statements), the selection committee appointed by the County Manager developed two lists of appraisers
for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. One list, called the "Eminent Domain List," is
made up of those appraisers who have demonstrated through training and experience a high level of
competence in the field of eminent domain appraisal, a very specialized branch of the appraisal
profession.
Thc level of competence of those respondents placed on the eminent domain list was dca-mined by the
selection committee through a combination ofps. st experimc~s with th8 spprlisers, ami through extensive
follow-up with past clients and others listed as references by the applicants, lnve~hi-gnt managers,
review atypraiser~, fight.of-way agent~, real estate department numaget~, ~torney~ ~ other~ were
It is the intent of the Real Property Management Depa~hnent to utilize appraiser~ fi-om lhe
Dom~fin List whenever public worl~ projects require the partial talcing of ~n owner's property, or
whenever the po~'ibility exis'.~ that a property will have to be acquired through condemnation.
WI'file all of the appr~r, er~ on both lira are State Certified General real et'me ~-aiser~ the
on the "Standard List," have not focused on eminent domain a~qyraisal ~ a ~ecialty. It i~ the intent of
the Real Property Management Department to utilize the appraiser~ on the Standanl L~ for
assignments which do not involve partial acquisitions or the threat of eminent domain.
Tbe~ lists may be expanded fi-om time to time by ~ubsequent Board a~roval of the ~ddition of oth~
appraiser~ who make proper application for a review of their qualifieatiom. The current
appraiser lists will expire on April 11, 1997. The Real Property Management Departm~
recommending renewal of the firms named on the attached lists for a final one year term (from April 11,
1997 through April 10, 1998). In Sanuary 1998, another Request for Proposal will be developed in order
to invile the appraisal community to apply for pre-qualification necessary to once again establish two
new lists of Board-approved appraisers.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: Tim the Board of Coun1~ Commissioners of Collier Count, Florida, renew ~s
"iq)proved appraisers" those appraisers Nd/or appraisal firms named on 'd~ Standard Appraisal I.~ of
Appraisers and the Eminent Domain List of Appraisers for Collier Coumy, Florida.
PREPARED B · DATE' .~" 4fi'' ~'
ro em Direaor
REVIEWED BY: ..~~ ~.. ~
Steve C~-nel!, Purchasing Director
DATE:
E. Ochs, Jr., Suppo~ SeaMers Administrator
COLLIER COUNTY APPROVED APPRAISER LIST
STANDARD APPRAISAL SERVICES
(EFFECTIVE APR.R. 11, 1997)
Accredited Appr~i.~s
1601 M~on Avenue, Suite 203
Punta Gorda, f~ 33950
PHONE
FAX
941-637-5890
941-575-$657
Appraisal Research Corp.
4306 Arnold Avenue
Naples, Florida 34104
PHONE
FAX
941-643-6888
941-643-6871
Environmental Science and Engineering
5840 West Cypress Street, Suite A
Tampa, Florida 33607
PHONE
FAX
813-287-2755
813-287-2722
GM Phillips and Company
825 South Tamiarni Trail, Suite 1
Venice, Florida 34285
PHONE
FAX
941.1484-3569
941-484-5497
Hewitt, Olson and Associates
439 Northeast 7th Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-1207
PHONE
FAX
954-764-5007
954-779-3137
Stewart, Stephan and Bowen, Inc.
1919 Courtney Drive, Suite 9
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
PHONE
FAX
941-936-4041
941-936-3141
EMINENT DOMAIN APPRAISAL SERVICES
('EFFECTIV]~ APRIL ! I, !~)7)
Douglas J. Dane, MAI
Coastal Appraisal Services
3106 S. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Joseph F. l~ller, ASA
P,~ Property Analysts, Inc.
10(X) South Federal Highway, Suite 202
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441
Emie Carroll and Raymond Carroll, MAI
Ca, rroU & Carroll Real Estate Appraisers
2500 Airport Road South, Suite 206
Naples, Florida 34112
Sewell, Valentich, Tillis and Assoc
766 Hudson Avenue, Suite A
Sarasota., Florida 34236
Paul Roper, MAI
Clayton, Roper and Marshall
427 North Magnolia Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801-1524
Douglas S. Maitland, MAI
Criteria and Associates, Inc.
257 Airport Road South
Naples, Florida 34 i 04
Victor J. Scodius, ASA
American Acquisition Group
5600 West Mariner Street, Suite 220
Tampa, Florida 33609
Woodward S. Hanson, MAI
Hanson Appraisal Company
2233 Second Stree~
Fort Myers, Florida 33901
Kenneth R. Devos, MAI
6309 Corporate Court, Suite 208
Fort Myers, Florida 33919
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONE
FAX
PHONU~
FAX
PHONE
FAX
941..643-2324
941-643-1143
954-420-5200
954-420-5388
941-775-1147
941-775-2154
941-365-5111
941-365-3781
407423-0111
407-649-8545
941434-8449
941434-2146
813-287-8191
813-287-8272
941-334-4430
941-334-O403
941-437-2245
9414374250
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RKCOM'M~K~ATION TO AWARD BID NO. 97-2641 FOR KXTKRIOR
PRESSURE CL~I~IG.
~ To ob~in Board approval to award Bid No. 97-2641 for exterior
pre~sure
CONSXDERATIONS: The County desires to have an on-c~ pressure cleanin~
cor~'actor to cle4n the exterior of buildings and I~'ounds of various County properties.
On Januu7 31, 1997 formal bid invitations were posted and distributed to 34 vendort that
provide this type of t~-rvice. On Februa.,7 19, 1997, three bids were received and opened
(see attached Bid Tabulation Sheet). Sutff recommends awsrdini~ to Precision Cleaning
Incorporated, ~s they ~re the apparent low bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are appropriated in the Facilities Management Department
along with other department budgets.
GROWTH MANA~;~tENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners award Bid No.
97-2641 for exterior pressure cleaning to Precision Cleaning Incorporated as outlined
above.
PREPARED BY: ~~ ~~~~. DATE:
Skip Cat~pl (~FM,"l~irector
Department of Facilities Mana~ent
REVIEWED BY:
SteP~'~"Y. Carn~ll, Director
Purchasing Department
REVIEWED BY:
Leo E. Ochs, Jr., Administrator
Support Services [)ivision
DN FOK BID ~97.2641
POSTING DATE: .~anuar~ $1,1997
Sidewalk, walk'ways, concrete, root' tile~
Cost per ~u~re foot
PTess~.re Stear~ Cleaning" OPENING DATE: Feb~ 19, 1997
~A~ONS S~ TO: 34 Vendors
......................... ,.~-~;;;...j;-~-~:~--~ ~,~:~ ..... ~ ...............
~~ ,,~,/,~0 ,~ ~,,',~+,'~ ', e~,~ ~ .............
Wails tnd underha-ugs up to 110 feet
Co~t per squar~ foot
Are :hree ~-ri~ten references at~ched?
Prompt Payment Terms:
Addenda Acknowledged:
oW~ s
s s ,/o s · -
___~e,.~o___.__.~es ~no ~-'~es____no _____y~s .... no
% ~vs
..... · ~. al,y, ~,. ~d,~, ~.--~y' ~
Net ~ days Net ~ days N~ ~ days Net ~ &ys
W1TNESS:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL
ACCOUNTS WHEREIN THE COUNTY HAS RECEIVED PAYMENT AND SAID LIENS ARE
SATISFIED IN FULL FOR THE 1991 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt a Resolution approving
the Satisfaction of Liens for certain residential accounts where the County has
received payment In full for the 1991 Solid Waste ColleCtion and Disposal Services
Special Assessments.
CONSIDERATIONS: Resolution No. 93-29 adopted by the Board on January 26, 1993
provided for the recording of the list Of 1991 delinquent solid waste collection and
disposal services special assessments and a mailing of a written notice of the
imposition of each residential unit lien. Resolution No. 93-29 was recorded on
February 1, 1993 In Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598 of the Official
Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain residential
properties for the 1991 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special
Assessments.
Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, provides that Satisfaction of Liens
shall be approved by Resolution of the Board of county Commissioners.
The attached Resolution lists the 13 accounts that have paid in full for the 1991 Solid
Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment Liens.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for recording the Satisfaction of Lien and the
Resolutlon Is approximately $88.50 which is to be charged to Account No.
510.102030-649030.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That that Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached
Resolution approving the 13 Satisfaction of Liens for the accounts listed in the
Resolution and authorizing the Chairman to sign the 13 Satisfaction of Liens for the
1991 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment Liens.
Prepared b~~x ,~ .... n
Para Callis, ~.,countrng Tecnmc~a
Reve n/~S~rvices Departme. nt
ReviewedbY://~~/-~ r Date:
TereSa A. Riesen, Revenue Manage
Revenue Se~ices Depa~ment ~
]onn ~kO~v, Dir~cto~
Revenue ~ices Depa~
Led Ochs, Jr., Admlnlst~tor
Suppo~ Se~ices Di.~n
NAR ! 8 1991
1
3
4
7
9
Io
I1
12
13
16
17
18
~o
21
22
23
29
31
32
38
3~
40
41
42
,~3
44
RESOLUTION NO. g7 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS
FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL
THE 1991 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board
of County Commissioners on January 26, 1993 adopted Resolution No. 93-29 authorizing
the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal
services special assessments for 1991; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 93-29, was recorded on February 1, 1993 in Official
Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598 of the Official Records of Collier County,
Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection
and disposal services special assessments for 1991; and
WHEREAS. Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board lo
approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all
accounts that have been paid in full.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County
Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the
1991 Service Year Solid Waste: Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the
following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 93-29,
whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified
herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified
herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the
Board of County Commissioners. and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and
these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County:
Account No. 1504
Account No. 16201
Account No. 23100
Account No. 26806
Account No. 26958
Account No. 40552
Account No. 45609
Account No. 54001
Account No. 58052
Account No. 66659
Account No. 80208
Account No. 84505
Account No. 95400
HAR I 8 1997
7
9
10
II
12
1.1
14
16
I?
18
19
This Resolution adopted this_
second
and majodty vote.
ATTEST:
DW1GHT E, BROCK, CLERK
Approved as Io form and
legal sufficiency:
Ass stant County Attorney
day of
_,1997 affermot~n,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL
ACCOUNTS WHEREIN THE COUNTY HAS RECEIVED PAYMENT AND SAID LIENS ARE
SATISFIED IN FULL FOR THE 1993 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt a Resolution approving
the Satisfaction of Liens for certain residential accounts where the County has
received payment In full for the 1993 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services
Special Assessments.
CONSIDERATIONS: Resolution No. 94-694 adopted by the Board on September 20,
1994 provided for the recording of the list of 1993 delinquent Solid Waste
Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments and a mailing of a written
notice of the Imposition of each resldentlal unlt lien. Resolution No. 94-694 was
recorded on September 22, 1994 In Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through
1749 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain
residential properties for the 1993 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services
Special Assessments.
Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, provides that Satisfaction of Liens
shall be approved by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners.
The attached Resolution lists the 19 accounts that have paid In full for the 1993 Solid
Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment Liens.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact for recording the Satisfaction of Lien and the
Resolution is approximately S124.50 which Is to be charged to Account No.
510-102030.649030.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That that Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached
Resolution approving the 19 Satisfaction of Liens for the accounts listed in the
Resolution and authorizing the Chairman to sign the 19 Satisfaction of Liens for the
1993 Solid Waste Collection and Dlsposal Services Special Assessment Liens.
Prepared by: -.~~~\ ~~_
Para Callis,~-~ountin~ Technician
Reve n u,u~S~ervices Department
Reviewed by: ,"~~' ~. ~ Date:
Tefes~ A. Riesen, Revenue Manager
Revenue Services Department
John A~, Yonkosky, Di~ctor~
Revenu~ Services D~pattm~nt
Support Services Division
RESOLUTION NO. 97 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS
FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNT THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL
THE 1993 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant tO Collier County Ordinance NO. 90-$0, as amended, the
BOard of County Commissioners on September 20, 1994 adopted Resolution No.
94-694 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the clellnquent solid waste
collection and disposal services special assessments for 1993; and
WHEREAS, COllier County Ordinance NO. 9~30, as amended, requires the Board
to approve by Resolution and record tn the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on
all accounts that have been paid in full.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant tO Collier County Ordinance NO. 90-30, as
amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1993 Service Year
Solid Waste Collection and DiSpOSal Special Assessment for the following accounts
numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution NO. 94-694, whereupon
a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts Identified
herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts
identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to
sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk Is directed to
record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien Individually in the official
records of Collier County:
26
27
28
29
3O
32
33
34
36
37
38
39
4O
4l
42
43
44
47
48
49
Account NO. 107
Account NO. 644
Account NO. 673
Account NO. 725
ACCOUnt NO. 1960
ACcount NO. 2765
ACCOUnt No. 3340
ACCOUnt NO. 4404
ACCOUnt NO. 13165
Account No. 15697
ACCOUnt: NO. 18319
ACCOunt NO. 19211
Account NO. 19855
Account No. 20569
ACcount No. 25386
ACCOUnt NO. 26026
Account No. 27070
ACCOUnt NO. 27821
ACCOUnt NO. 2749
MAR ! 8
This Resolution adopted this
second and majority vote.
6
?
8
9
I0
12
14
15
16
18
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
~hlrley Jean McEachern
Assistant County A[-torney
..gay of _
,1997 after motion,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAII~MAN
recelve~ Davment in tull for the 1992 Solid Waste Collection and DIspo~I ~lces
~ONIIIJlRATIONII ROi01utlon NO, 94.8 8 acloptea tM ,oar on septem e tl,
1994 provlde~ For the recording oF the list of 1992 ~elln~uent soll~ waste collection
In0 ~ll~olal le~lc~ special assessmen~ an~ a mailing o~ a wrl~en notice of tM
Imposition of each residential unl~ lien. Resolution No, e4.568 ~l recgr~e~ on
September 19, 1994 In Official Record Book 1988, Pages 766 tbroug~ 942 Of the
Official Records of Collier Count, Florida, which DlaceO a lien on ce~ln residential
prope~les for th, lt9~ Solla WaSt, Collection an0 ~11~OIII It~lCtl IDlClal
Colller county orclinance NO. 90-30, as amenOe(;l, provlafl Jhitl; lill;lifill;l;Ion of I, lenl
t1~1tll bO. ~r)llrov0cl by ~elOlutlon of the lioarl:l of Countv CommlllloMrl.
TI~o tt[[~t¢l~e~l I~elolutloll lilt! tho lO aCcourtt! that Mvo Dald Irt tull tot tho ~t~J §ollel
Waste Collection ancl Disposal Servlcltl $Declal Als~llmellt Llerll.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal Impact for recording the Satisfaction of Lien and the
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
I~II;OMMINDATIONI Tn,l: thai,Gate of counfv :0111mlll10Ml"l
Resolution approving the 36 Satisfaction of Liens on the accounts IlsteO In the
Resolution and authorizing the Chairman to sign the ~6 ~tt~f~ctlon of
Revenue Services Depap:cnent
Reviewed by: ."
Date:
John ~Yonkosky', ~rect:or/
ReVen..u_e, Services Delbartrt~ent:
Leo Ochs, Jr., Administrator
SUppo~ Services/Division HAR I 8 1997 I
i
2
?
!
9
II
14
Is
16
1'7
19
2!
22
2~
~9
3?
39
41
42
48
4~
RESOLUTION NO. g7-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS
FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE
1992 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-$0, as amended, the
Board of County Commissioners on September 19, 1994 adopted ResOlution No.
94-668 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste
colleCtion and disposal services special assessments for 1992; and
WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board
to approve by Resolution and record In the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on
all accounts that have been paid In full.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. g~$o, as
amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1992 Sen/Ice Year
Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts
numbered below, subsecluent to the adoPtiOn of Resolution No. 94-668, whereupon
a lien had been recoraed on real property pertaining to the accounts Identified
herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attachecl hereto referencing the accounts
Identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman Is hereby authorized to
sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk IS directed to
record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien IndlvldualN In the official
records of Collier County:
ACCOUnt NO. 6606
Account NO. 9250
ACcount No. 11604
ACCOUnt NO. 13806
Account NO. 15202
Account No. 25700
Account NO. 29900
ACCOUnt NO. 34908
Account NO. 35004
Account No. 37400
Account NO. 54302
Account NO. 56850
ACcount NO. 65757
ACCOUnt NO. 66853
Account No. 67658
Account No. 72601
ACCOUnt NO. 75006
Account No. 75857
ACCOUnt No. 79455
Account NO. 98656
ACCOunt NO. 111203
Account NO. 116059
ACCOUnt NO. 129457
ACCOUnt NO. 150750
Account No. 132305
Account NO. 139450
Account No. 139706
ACcount NO. 152822
AcCOUnt NO. 152987
Account NO. 9454
ACCOUnt NO. 13204
Account NO. 18500
ACCOUnt NO. 20307
Account NO. 24358
Account NO. 28202
Account NO. 37604
This ResOlUtiOn adopted this
second and majority vote.
19
2O
21
22
24
26
28
29
31
32
~4
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Shirley Jean McEachern
Assistant County Attorney
day Of , 1997 after motion,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
RECOMMENDATION TO AI~PROVE A BUDGET AMEND~ TO
AFPROI~UATE TI:IF. MAINTEN~ SERVICES I~'~ENUES TIIAT ABE IN
EXCESS OF TKEIR BUDGET.
l~ To have the Board of Cotmty C_.omaisgom~ ~ lie ~
budget anmxlmem ,ppropriatia$ those revemes received wbid~ ~e is m~m of ~
cunun budget, for the ixirchue of materials and equipmem.
CONSIDERATIONI;; As an internal service deparmm~ few-,,,_ __,?~_ ~,~
~om various "canmm~ depamnm~ a.s paymem for
performed. When act~ requests for services exceed tho~ smicipmml at II~ ~ of
budget preparation, additional budget authorization is n~ded to
additional work requests being received from other depanmm~ Tlis
approximately three times per year. These funds are already ~ is tie mcr
departments and are merely bein8 transferred to the Building Maimmm~ Sec~e Cost
Center.
FISCAL IMPACT: The revenues in excess of the current budget ~ I~ appropriated
for the purposes of continuin$ operations co 00{-1222&0 in the amount of $12,350.
GROWTH MANAGMENT IMPACT: None.
_RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of Coumy Commhai~ approve the
necessary budget amendmems within this summary.
PREPARED BY:~
Department of Facilities Management
REVIEWED BY:
Leo E. Ochs, .Ir., Admi~strator
Division of Support Services
DATE:
1997
~EPORT TO THI BOARD OF CO~JrTY t~0~IJSZOS~RS C(~[(~J~&3~3 THE
SALE AND TRAWSFE~ OF ITBMS ABSCX2IAT3D Wl'TH THZ CC~]]T~
BU~PLUS AUCTION OF FEBRUARY 22, 1997.
~z To present the results of the recent County
property auction to the Board of County Commissioners for
ratification.
~z On February 11, 1997, the Board of County
Commissioners authorized staff to conduct an auction of
specified County-owned assets for the purpose of disposing
of these items and generating revenues for the County.
The auction was conducted on behalf of the County by First
Coast Auction & Realty, Inc. on February 22, 1997. The
auction included 25 vehicles from Fleet Management, EMS, and
Isle of Capri Fire Department, along with 34 marked and
unmarked vehicles, and miscellaneous office equipment and
auto parts from the Collier County Sheriff's Office. The
remaining items were miscellaneous pieces of furniture,
office equipment, and lawn equipment from the Board of
County Commissioners.
Prior to the auction, several County agencies requested
transfer of the assets approved for disposition.
Accordingly, these items were turned over to the requesting
agencies. Attached is the list of items approved for
disposition that have been transferred to County departments
and other agencies.
The auction generated $191,912.00 in actual gross revenues
and $176,559.04 in net revenues. The breakdown of gross and
net revenues between the Board of County Commissioners and
the Sheriff's Office is as follows. The gross revenue for
Collier County is $134,952.00 and $124,155.84 in net
revenue. The actual gross revenue for the Sheriff's Office
is $56,960.00 and $52,403.20 in net revenue. The
Auctioneer's commission is $15,352.96.
In order to eliminate any opportunity for delay in receiving
the sale proceeds, the auctioneer is required to turn over
the gross proceeds from the sale to the County on the day of
the event. Two transactions (in the total amount of $57.50)
were double-entries in the Auctioneer's computer on the day
of the sale; the Auctioneer made immediate refunds, but the
amount was included in the County's deposit. The proceeds
and sales records have been audited and the County is now
prepared to pay the auctioneer his commission, plus the
reimbursement of $57.50.
AMi, o~
.o.,,
Executive Summary
Page 2
RE: County Surplus Auction of February 22, 1997
FISCAL IMPACTs Net revenues have been allocated as follows:
Airport Authority
Department of Revenue
Fleet Management
Fleet Management
Isle of Capri F~re
Pelican Bay
Road & Bridge
Water/Sewer Dist.
General Fund
Fund 495-192310
Fund 510-102020
Fund 521-122410
Fund 522-122464
Fund 144-144360
Fund 109-182901
Fund 101-163620
Fund 408-253212
Fund 001-121730
$ 598 00
5,750 00
2,079 20
94,116 00
5,980 00
2,576 00
4,232.00
4,968.00
~,.856.64
Net Proceeds
$124,155.84
GROWTH MANAQEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners
accept and ratify the revenues for the County Auction held
on February 22, 1997 pursuant to the itemized sales report
attached herein.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
~a~ra Celed~nia, Buyer II
Purchasing Department
Stephen Ca'nell, CSM, Director
Purchasing/General Services Dept.
Leo E. Ochs, J~ Administrator
Support ServiCeS Division
DATE: Q3/05/97
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
All sales
SN BN Item Description
Tax Price
Qty
page 1
Total
1 563 119S
I 787 143S
1 606 144S
1 965 1475
1 13 151S
1 142 249S
1 605 268S
1 445 271S
1 624 296S
1 983 300S
10 13 500
10 13 501
10 971 502
10 13 503
10 13 504
10 971 505
10 971 506
11 13 507
11 13 508
11 13 509
11 897 510
11 13 511
11 13 512
11 955 513
11 968 514
11 971 515
11 853 516
11 604 521
11 604 522
11 998 525
11 992 526
11 13 528
11 967 529
11 13 531
11 998 533
91 FORD CROWN VIC Y
2FACP72GXMX177132
87 FORD T-BIRD Y
1FABP6030h~183243
87 BUICK CENTURY Y
1G4AL51W7~T432053
89 PLYMOUTH VAN Y
2P4F}{25K7KRl18222
87 FORD CROWN VIC Y
2FABP74F6HX150595
92 FORD CROWN VIC Y
2FACP72WSNX200898
90 CHEV LUMINA Y
2G1WL54T7Llll1598
92 FORD CROWN VIC Y
2FACP72WXNX240299
87 FORD T-BIRD Y
1FABP6236HH228859
88 BUICK CENTURY Y
2G4WB14W5J1401005
COMPAQ CPU A
IBM CPU
NEC MONITOR
IBM CPU
PC SYSTEMS CPU
COMPAQ MONITOR
COMPAQ MONITOR Y
DIGITAL KEYBOARD A
IBM KEYBOARD
IBM KEYBOARD
IBM PRINTER Y
DIGITAL VT320 MONITOR
IBM MONITOR
PACKARD BELL MONITOR
CANNON COPIER TABLE TOP Y
31" PREMIER CUTTING BOARD Y
LEATHER SIDE CHAIR W\ARMS Y
GRAY CLOTH SECRETARY CHAIR
BLACK LEATHER'CHAIR W\ARMS
PLOTTER BOARD W\DIGITIZER Y
GREY 3 SHELF METAL BOOKCASE Y
3 SHELF METAL BOOKSHELF A
3 DRAWER METAL CABINET Y
SQUARE OAK COFFEE TABLE A
GREY METAL 4 DRAWER FILE Y
CABINET
i 950.00
i 850.00
I 600.00
i 1,700.00
1 900.00
i 2,500.00
I 1,350.00
i 3,350.00
1 1,600.00
I 850.00
1
Sold with item 500
Sold with item 506
Sold with item 500
Sold with item 500
Sold with item 506
1
1
Sold with item 507
Sold with item 507
1
Sold with item 589
Sold with item 589
Sold with item 574
1
1
1
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
1
1
1
1
1
1
70.00
70.00
2.50
2.50
62.50
7.50
22.50
20.00
10.00
7.50
10.00
2.50
5.00
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY,
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
Ail sales
SN BN Item Description Tax Price Qty
page 2
Total
11 604 536
11 981 537
12 979 539
12 979 540
13 992 542
13 613 547
13 653 553
13 967 554
13 631 557
13 955 558
14 612 560
14 790 561
14 943 562
14 623 563
14 612 564
14 13 565
14 567
15 969 568
16 992 569
17 604 571
18 955 574
19 642 575
19 979 576
19 979 577
19 979 578
19 979 579
19 623 580
19 577 581
19 991 582
19 653 583
19 969 584
15 475 585
15 604 586
15 212 587
20 604 588
20 13 589
20 604 590
20 604 591
CANNON COPIER TABLE TOP Y
SHARP COPIER TABLE TOP Y
PRINTER Y
DIGITAL LA424 MULTI PRINTER Y
ON STAND
FORMICA SHELVED CABINET Y
BLACK METAL 2 SHELF Y
BOOKCASE
BROWN 2 DRAWER FILE CABINET Y
BLACK 5 DRAWER FILE CABINET Y
(4) GREY METAL INDEX CARD Y
FILES
(4) WOOD\BURGUNDY CLOTH Y
SIDE CHAIRS
PICKUP BLACK PLASTIC TOOL Y
BOX
T~NNANT 17" FLOOR BUFFER Y
PH METER Y
COMPUTER WORK TABLE
PICKUP TAN PLASTIC TOOL BOX Y
BROWN FORMICA WORK SURFACE
LABORATORY DISHWASHER
PANASONIC LASER PRINTER Y
WOODEN CREDENZA Y
BROWN CLOTH CHAIR
DIGITAL VT340 MONITOR, Y
KEYBOARD
DIGITAL VT320-AZ MONITOR, Y
KEYBOARD
DIGITAL VT420 MONITOR Y
DIGITAL VT420 MONITOR,
KEYBOARD
DIGITAL VT420 MONITOR
DIGITAL VT220 MONITOR Y
DIGITAL LA50 RA PRINTER Y
PANASONIC UF250 FAX MACHINE Y
DIGITAL LA755-AZ PRINTER
CITIZEN GSX145 PRINTER
PAYLESS COMPUTER SYSTEM
LANIER COPY MACHINE
SHARP COPIER
3M COPIER
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
1 35.00
1 2.00
i 10.00
I 20.00
I 5.00
I 2.50
I 2.50
I 2.50
i 2.50
1 40.00
1 15.00
50.00
2.50
15.00~
30.00
5.00
17.50
1 12.50
12.50
1
1
Sold with item 580
1
Sold with item 665
*** Not sold ***
1
1
Sold with item 626
1
1
Sold with item 579
Sold with item 579
1
1
1
Sold with item 600
y 1
y 1
y 1
y 1
y
y 1
A 1
y 1
Sold with item
5.00
7.50
10.00
15.00
7.50
5.00
50.00
50.00
5.00
7.50
2.50
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & R~ALTY, XNC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
Ail sales
page 3
SN BN Item Description Tax
Price Qty Total
20 592
20 653 593
20 653 594
20 13 595
20 967 596
20 653 597
14 991 600
1 565 601S
14 652 606
14 652 607
15 569 608
15 474 609
15 943 610
15 992 612
15 569 613
15 569 614
15 604 615
19 604 617
12 963 618
12 963 619
13 943 620
13 963 622
13 963 623
13 963 624
13 963 625
13 604 626
13 963 627
13 604 628
13 613 631
13 971 634
13 569 635
13 604 638
13 604 640
13 13 643
13 992 644
13 992 646
13 652 647
13 13 651
~ 873 654s
13 613 658
992 660
955 661
e13
13
NCR PRINTER
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
NCR MONITOR & KEYBOARD
OKIDATA PRINTER
(8) 2 DRAWER FILE CABINET
NCR MONITOR
MICROFICHE VIEWER
86 CADILLAC
1B6C04785G4202116
CREDENZA
CREDENZA
WOODEN DESK
GE REFRIGERATOR
GE REFRIGERATOR
2 DRAWER FILE CABINET
RECEPTION DESK
RECEPTION DESK
WOOD TYPING STAND
SAMTRON MONITOR
PRINTER
BURSTER
(2) CREAM LEATHER SIDE
CHAIRS
NAVY CLOTH SIDE CHAIR
GRAY CLOTH SIDE CHAIR
BLACK METAL\VINYL CHAIR
BROWN WOOD\VINYL CHAIR
BROWN CLOTH\VINYL CHAIR
(4) ASSORTED CHAIRS
ASSORTED SECRETARY CHAIRS
(2) BLUE SWIVEL CHAIR
BROWN HIGHBACK CHAIR
BROWN FABRIC\VINYL CHAIR
BLACK FABRIC STOOL
(4) ASSORTED SECRETARY
CHAIRS
2 SHELF WOOD UNIT
METAL DESK
METAL CREDENZA
GREEN 4 DRAWER FILE CABINET
WOOD\FORMICA TABLE
88 TOYOTA 4X4
3T4RN63ASJ0207110
2 SHELF WOOD SHOP TABLE
METAL SHOP TABLE
METAL SHOP TABLE
*** Not sold ***
y i 2.50
y i 5.00
A i 2.50
y i 25.00
y I 2.50
y 1 5.00
y 1 700.00
Sold with item 607
y I 2.50
y I 5.00
y 1 42.50
y 1 42.50
y i 7.50
Sold with item 614
Y 1 25.00
Y 1 5.00
Sold with item 615
Y 1 5.00
Sold with item 618
y I 10.00
Y 1 5.00
Sold with item 622
Sold with item 622
Sold with item 622
¥ 1 35.00
Sold with item 622
Sold with item 626
Y 1 25.00
Y 1 12.50
Y 1 5.00
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
A 1 2.50
Y 1 5.00
Y 1 22.50
Sold with item 709
Sold with item 675
Y 1 4,250.00
Y
Y
1 5.00
Sold with item 646
b 10~00_
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
Ail sales
SN BN Item Description Tax Price
Qty
page 4
Total
13 13
13 13
13 13
13 992
13 613
13 937
13
13
13
13
21
14
14
14
14
22
22
22
22
22
22
1
22
22
22
22
22
2O
20
2
3
4
5
13
992
993
652
992
474
642
979
994
853
853
604
604
604
604
497
604
604
604
652
971
642
994
13
609
612
72
449
449
873
449
434
709
710
711
715
716
720
721
722
662 8' WHITE TOP WOOD TABLE A
663 8' WHITE TOP WOOD TABLE
665 FORMICA WORK TABLE A
668 ADJUSTABLE COMPUTER TABLE
670 WOODEN TABLE y
674 TAN METAL SLANTED PRINTER y
STAND
675 (2) TACK BOARD A
677 IBM SELECTRIC TYPEWRITER y
679 MTA DC 1205 COPIER y
682 MICRO-FILE FILM UNIT y
683 OLYMPIA STARTYPE TYPEWRITER Y
689 WOODEN PRINTER STAND y
692 DIGITAL MONITOR & KEYBOARD y
693 MONITOR y
694 MONITOR y
695 STACKING CHAIRS y
696 STACKING CHAIRS
697 BLACK LEATHER CHAIR
698 CLOTH SECRETARY CHAIR
699 LEATHER SECTRETARY CHAIR
700 CLOTH SECTRETARY CHAIR
701S 87 ACURA LEGEND y
702 CLOTH SECRETARY CHAIR
703 LEATHER\CLOTH SECRETARY
CHAIR
704 LEATHER\CLOTH SECRETARY
CHAIR
FILE CABINET y
3 DRAWER CARD FILE y
IBM ELECTRIC TYPEWRITER
(3) 2 DRAWER FILE CABINET y
COMPAQ DESKPRO SYSTEM
ONAN GENERATOR y
KROYTYPE LABELMAKER W\DISKS y
90 CHEV CAVALIER y
1G1JC54G2L1227293
723 90 CHEV S-10 BLAZER y
1GNCT18Z7MS124844
724 90 CHEV C20 CARGO y
1GCEG25Z7L7148906
725 90 CHEV BLAZER y
1GNEV18KXLF154307
726 90 CHEV C20 CARGO y
2GCEG25Z5L4135888
727 90 CHEV C3500 y
1GBGC34N5LE2522125
1 10.00
Sold with item 662
i 5.00
Sold with item 644
1 5.00
1 2.50
1 2.50
I 1.25
I 140.00
i 2.50
1 1.25
i 5.00
1 2.50
i 2.50
1 2.50
i 22.50
Sold with item 695
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
i 2,500.00
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
Sold with item 626
i 2.50
1 5.00
Sold with item 878
I 10.00
Sold with item 531
i 750.00
I 5.00
1 1,550.00
1 4,950.00
4,950.00
i 6,000.00
I 4,250.00
02-26-1997
PIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
All sales
SN BN Item Description Tax Price
Qty
page 5
Total
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
22
22
22
5 920 728
5 563 729
5 72 730
5 449 731
5 449 732
5 59 733
5 958 734
5 14 735
5 14 736
5 783 737
5 862 738
5 609 739
6 617 740
5 864 741
609 742
609 743
14 744
466 746
893 748
862 753
185 755
13 756
462 757
992 758
91 C}{EV C30 Y
2GAGG39K3M4119923
91 FORD F350 AMBULANCE Y
1FDK£30M4MHB07957
91 CHEV CAVALIER Y
1G1JC54G6MJ171408
91 CHEV CAVALIER Y
1G1JC54G5MJ170539
91 CHEV CORSICA Y
1G1LT63TXME127501
91 CHEV CORSICA Y
1G1LT63TXME127632
91 CHEV CORSICA Y
1G1LT53TXMY145088
91 CHEV 1500 TRUCK Y
1GCDK14ZSMZ153124
91 CHEV S-10 4WD Y
1GCCT14ZPM22~0236
89 FORD BRONCO Y
1FMCU12T1KUA96615
93 CHEV C1500 Y
1GCDC14Z6PE166088
91 FORD F350 AMBULANCE Y
1FDKE30M3MHB03642
79 FORD F700 FIRE Y
F70CVEA9845
91 FORD F350 AMBULANCE Y
1FDKE30M2MHB06208
87 FORD F700 DUMP Y
1FDNF70H7HVA30333
91 FORD E350 AMBULANCE Y
1FDKE30MXMHB06215
89 CHEV C2500 Y
1CGCFC24ZXKE208799
89 CHEV C3500 Y
1GBGR34K4KF305071
91 CHEV K1500 Y
1GCDK14Z9MZ152791
91 CHEV C2500 Y
1GBGC24K2ME148158
93 CHEV C1500 Y
1GCDC14ZXPE167566
(8) IBM SELECTRIC A
TYPEWRITER
(3) XEROX MEMORYWRITER Y
(3) XEROX MEMORYWRITER Y
i 4,250.00
I 2,700.00
i 500.00
i 2,700.00
i 2,600.00
i 2,950.00
I 2,800.00
1 7,100.00
i 2,350.00
I 2,800.00
1 5,700.00
i 7,000.00
i 6,500.00
I 9,000.00
i 4,600.00
1 5,500.00
1 4,150.00
i 5,400.00
i 7,400.00
i 6,250.00
i 5,900.00
i 10.00
1 12.50
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY; INC
, dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
All sales
SN BN Item Descrigtion Tax Price
Qty
page 6
Total
22 13 759
22 996 760
22 604 761
22 963 762
22 963 763
22 13 764
22 13 765
7 604 767
7 604 768
7 897 769
7 13 770
7 943 771
7 943 772
7 955 773
7 955 774
7 604 775
8 996 776
8 963 777
8 577 778
8 996 779
8 996 780
8 996 781
9 918 783
9 574 784
3 642 787
13 955 790
10 897 792
10 897 793
10 996 794
10 955 795
10 897 796
10 937 797
10 642 798
10 642 799
10 13 800
10 623 801
10 577 802
10 623 803
10 969 804
10 968 805
13 968 807
16 465 808
13 992 809
(4) PRINTERS A
(2) OKIDATA PRINTERS Y
(8) CALCULATORS Y
(2) NCR CHECK VALIDATORS Y
(7) KEYBOARDS Y
(6) NCR TERMINALS A
(7) NCR CPU A
IBM SYSTEM Y
IBM SYSTEM Y
IBM SYSTEM Y
IBM SYSTEM A
PC SYSTEM Y
TWC SYSTEM Y
PC SYSTEM Y
COMPUTER SYSTEM Y
EPSON 3000 FAX MACHINE Y
DIGITAL MONITOR & KEYBOARD Y
PANASONIC TYPEWRITER Y
MURATA FAX MACHINE Y
DIGITAL MONITOR & KEYBOARD
DIGITAL MONITOR & KEYBOARD
DIGITAL MONITOR & KEYBOARD
FIRE BOSS Y
TORO RIDING MOWER Y
O LINE PLOTTER Y
(3) FORMICA CONFERENCE Y
TABLE
(2) DIGITAL MONITOR &
KEYBOARD
(6) MONITORS & KEYBOARDS
MONITOR & KEYBOARD
MISC FILING TRAYS
HP LAPTOP
BINDING MACHINE
IBM TYPEWRITERS
PANASONIC TYPEWRITER
DIGITAL PERSONAL PRINTER
STAR PRINTER
DIGITAL COMPANION PRINTER
IBM PERSONAL COMPUTER
PRINTER
HP LASERJET PRINTER Y
IBM PRO PRINTER Y
(2) EXECUTIVE CHAIR Y
MAGNAVOX 19" TELEVISION Y
WOODEN WORK TABLE
i 5.00
I 5.00
i 30.00
i 10.00
i 5.00
i 25.00
I 35.00
i 80.00
i 80.00
1 40.00
1 20.00
1 110.00
1 110.00
1 230.00
i 220.00
I 55.00
i 20.00
I 10.00
1 20.00
Sold with item 776
Sold with item 776
Sold with item 776
I 350.00
1 210.00
1 60.00
1 17.50
Sold with item 793
y I 85.00
Sold with item 776
y 1 5.00
Sold with item 793
y 1 10.00
Sold with item 878
Sold with item 878
A I 15.00
Y i 22.50
Y i 17.50
Y 1 12.50
1 45.00
1 12.50
1 30.00
1 27.50
Sold with item 569
MAR 1
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
All sales
page 7
SN BN Item Description Tax Price Qty Total
3 963 811 CONTACT TELEVISION y 1 15.00
13 631 812 BURIE SECURITY MONITOR y 1 5.00
13 992 814 DRAFTING TABLE LAMP & STOOL Y 1 7.50
13 613 815 SLIDE OUT DRAWER y i 5.00
13 613 816 WOODEN SHELVES Sold with item 815
13 604 817 (6) SECRETARY CHAIR Sold with item 626
16 474 818 1993 FLORIDA STATUES & y 1 2 50
SUPPLEMENTS '
7 976 819 MITA COPIER Y i 60.00
1 866 820S 88 FORD CROWN VIC y i 900.00
2FABP72F9JX154729
5 604 821 LARGE MAHOGANY DESK y i 80.00
5 898 822 HALF TON ENGINE HOIST y 1 225.00
1 866 822S 88 FORD CROWN VIC y 1 1,000.00
2FABP72F4JX154735
5 389 823 BEAR BATTERY TESTER y 1 100.00
5 622 824 MILLER PORTABLE GAS WELDER y 1 625.00
5 389 825 4 TON FLOOR JACK y 1 220.00
O 5 898 826 LINCOLN 4 TON FLOOR JACK y i 275.00
5 389 827 POWER MASTER BULK FLUID AIR Y i 100.00
PUMP
5 960 828 KOHLER 8 HP ENGINE y 1 60.00
5 389 829 HOSE CRIMPER SET HYDRAULIC y 1 275.00
5 653 830 WET & DRY VAC y 1 5.00
5 654 831 MCCLANE REAL MOWER y i 30.00
5 66 832 STIHL WEEDEATER y 1 5.00
5 790 833 BILLY GOAT MOWER y I 70.00
5 955 834 STIHL WEEDEATER y 1 20.00
5 913 835 STIHL WEEDEATER y I 5.00
5 66 836 STIHL WEEDEATER y 1 5.00
5 790 837 GREEN MACHINE CHAIN SAW y 1 30.00
20 652 839 (3) ROLLING FILE CABINET y I 2.50
13 955 840 PHONE Y 1 10.00
13 642 842 COMPUTER EQUIP Sold with item 878
13 66 843 MICROPHONE Y 1 2.50
23 642 844 TYPEWRITER Sold with item 878
13 635 846 DESK Y 1 7.50
13 635 848 3 HOLE PUNCH Y i 5.00
13 971 849 FILE DRAWERS Y i 7.50
13 642 850 TYPEWRITER Sold with item 878
910 642 851 TYPEWRITER Sold with item 878
910 967 852 PRINTER RACKS y I 12.50
13 66 853 NUTONE DOOR CHIME y 1 2.50
24 898 854 COMPRESSOR Y I
500.00
910 898 855 COMPRESSOR Y i _ ~00.00
910 654 856 COMPRESSOR Y I
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & ~EALTY~ INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
Ail sales
page 8
SN BN Item Description Tax
Price Qty
Total
5 586 857
24 795 858
24 790 859
24 968 860
910 927 861
24 13 862
24 654 863
24 66 864
9 586 865
9 654 866
25 969 867
16 943 868
25 867 869
25 577 870
25 992 872
25 577 873
25 971 874
25 475 875
25 623 876
25 631 876
25 604 877
25 981 878
25 642 878
25 642 879
25 642 880
25 969 881
25 13 882
25 943 883
25 212 884
25 604 885
910 967 898
1 449 900S
1 866 906S
475 910S
1 646 935S
1 866 941S
1 488 943S
866 947S
1 866 948S
PUMP
MOWER DECK
SAW
STIL BLOWER
SANITIZER
EDGER
EDGER
WEEDEATER
SNAPPER MOWER
EMERGENCY LIGHT BAR
HP LAZER JET
(2) LARGE WIRE BASKETS
RANDOM COLLEAGUE LAPTOP
PARAFAX FAX MACHINE
IBM ACTION WRITER
A T & T PRINTER
SIMPLIX TIME READER
(2) KEYBOARD HOLDERS
MISC COMPUTER
MISC COMPUTER
MISC COMPUTER
MISC COMPUTER
MISC COMPUTER
MISC COMPUTER
KEYBOARDS
(2) PRINTERS
MISC COMPUTER
MISC OFFICE
COMPUTER BOOKS & KEYBOARDS
(6) TELEPHONES
MISC
89 CHEV CAVALIER
1G1JCll12KJ306549
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72F6KX155242
89 ACURA INTEGRA
3H40A3359KS0089241
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72FSKX155257
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72F5KX155247
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72F2KX155271
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72F5KX155250
89 FORD CROWN VIC
2FABP72FSKX155260
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
A 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
Y 1
A 1
Sold with item 868
Sold with item 879
Y 1
Sold with item 852
Y 1
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
130.00
50.00
50.00
7.50
10.00
25.00
20.00
5.00
40.00
50.00
40.00
22.50
2.50
17.50
2.50
2.50
27.50
10.00
12.50~
5.00
2.50
17.50
30.00
7.50
22.50
42.50
70.00
5.00
1,300.00
i 1,200.00
1 3,000.00
i 1,500.00
I 1,200.00
1 1,800.00
1 1,100.00
02-26-1997
FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC
dba GARNER & ASSOCIATES AUCTIONEERS
P O BOX 7878 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32238
(904)772-0110 Fax: (904-777-8387
COLLIER COUNTY SURPLUS 2-22-97
All sales
SN BN Item Description Tax Price
Qty
page 9
Total
14 988S
142 1016S
610 1034S
865 1040S
865 1045S
610 1047S
610 1052S
610 1062S
610 1071S
142 1080S
610 1082S
961 1665S
460 3015S
652 4471S
460 5529
898 6251
604 6529
604 7221
604 7222
604 7523
499 7660
604 8489
898 9989
898 9999
89 FORD T-BIRD
1FAPP6040KH107088
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GiBL5474LA134845
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1G1BL5478LA135092
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GIBL5473LA136084
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GiBL547XLA136101
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1G1BL5478LA135917
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GIBL5471LA135984
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GIBL5477LA135925
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1G1BL547XLA135787
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1G1BL5478LA135531
90 CHEV CAPRICE
1GIBL5471LA135449
BEARCAT 210 SCANNER
PANASONIC 19" TELEVISION
TELEPHONE RECORDING SYSTEM
B&H MICROFICHE
READER/PRINTER
REALISTIC PRO 2001 SCANNER
SIMPLEX TIME STAMP
LATHAM TIME STAMP
LATHAM TIME STAMP
SIMPLEX TIME STAMP
OMNIFAX G55 FAX MACHINE
FAX MACHINE
AUTO PARTS
AIRBOAT BLADE
Y 1 1,750.00
Items:
Y I 1,500.00
Y i 1,400.00
Y 1 2,050.00
Y 1 2,100.00
Y 1 1,700.00
Y 1 2,100.00
Y 1 2,100.00
Y i 2,050.00
Y 1 1,700.00
Y 1 1,850.00
Y 1 15.00
Y 1 10.00
Y 1 12.50
Sold with item 3015
Y 1 20.00
Y 1 5.00
Sold with item 6529
Sold with item 6529
Sold with item 6529
Y 1 70.00
Y 1 30.00
Y 1 2.50
Y 1 105.00
325 Amount: 191,912.00
INVOICE
FROM:
First Coast Auction 8c Realty, Inc.
Post Office Box 7878
Jacksonville, FL 32238
904/772-0110
TO:
Collier County
3301 E. Tamlami Trail
Naple~, Florida 34112
941/774-8425
FEBRUARY 22, 1997 SURPLUS AUCTION
Collected by Auctioneer 8: Deposited
Overcharge
Gross Proceeds
Collier County
Sheriff's Department
Total Proceeds
$ 134,952.00
56.960.00
$ 191,912.00
$ 191,969.50'
_1'57.50]'~
$ 191,912.00
Commission to Auctioneer @ 8%
Reimbursement to correct double entries
Total amount due Auctioneer
County's Net Proceeds from Auction
Sheriff's Department's Net Proceeds
$
$
$
15,352.96
+ 57.50
15,410.46
124,155.84
$ 191,969.50
DATE:
March 3, 1997
MAR 1 8 1997
INTEI-D~PARTMINTAL TRANSFERS OF SURPLUS PROP1ERTY
~ I'TliM DESC~IITTION ASSET ~I II'OM TO
.517 Brown cloth sloe chair poilutlon Control parl~ & Rec Immk
518 BlUe cloth sloe chair Pollution Control Parks & pec Imml(
51cj Tan cloth sect'e~ry chair Pollution Control Parks & Rec Immk
520 Cloth Side chair Pollution Control Parks & Rec I~.
523 Tan cloth secretary chair Pollution Control Parks & Rec Immk
524. bak creclenza Pollution Control Pan~ & Ret: Immit
527 Tan 4 drawer metal file cabinet poilu:Ion Contrql Parks & Rec Immlt
530 G.r~y 4 shelf metal cabinet 8712 Pollution Control Fleet Man~ement
532 Gray metal 3 shelf bookcase Pollution Control Fleet Man...a~ement
534 Black 4 drawer vertical file cabinet Pollution Control Fleet Management
535 Black 4 clrawer file cabinet I poilutlon Control Fleet M.anagement
538 Oak clesk I Pollution Control Parks & Rec Immk
541 SOfa I Clerk of courts/Micro EMS
544 Formica storage cablnetr slx OdOrS I Clem of Courts/Micro Animal Control ..
545 . Formica storage cablnet~ 4 doors I Clerk of courts Facllltles Management
548 Metal storage cabinet 2 door ! Clerk of Courts Animal Control
549 File cabinet Zl drawer I Clerk of Courts Planning
550 File cabinet 4 clrawer I Clerk Of courts Planning
551 Fil~ cabinet 4 drawer I Clerk of Courts Plannln~
552 I MerCI file cabinet 2 drawer I Clerk of Courts/Micro EMS
555 Metal file cabinet 5 c~rawer~ tan ! 86919 Clerk of Courts/Micro EMS
556 Metal file cabinet 3 drawer one Parks & Recreation Fleet Management
side odor .
573 wooden work table left hand I purchasing Risk Management
cabinet ~
572 wooden Desk I Purchasing Parks & Rec
611 2 drawer file cabinet I Parks & £ecreation Fleet Management
; 621 2 cream fabric sicle chairs w/arms ~ Clerk of cour:s Parks & Recreation
- 62.~ Metal Stool I Clerk of Courts Facilities Management
632 Cream fabric hi,hi=ack chair ~ Clerk Of Courts Parks & Recreation
633 Cream fabric hi~lhback chair i Clerk of courts parks & Recreation
636 Cream fabric rolling chair I Clerk of Courts packs & Recreation
637 Brown cloth rolling chair I Clerk of Courts/Micro EMS
642 Brown Formica bOOkShelf I Clerk Of Cou~icro EMS
649 Formica/metal table ! Clerk of Courl:S Mediation
652 Formica Table I Clerk of Courts Parks & Rec
655 Formica table I Clerk of Courts Clerk of Courts
'~57 wooden end table w/o glass top I Clerk of Courts Parks & Recreation
659 Wooden end table~ tan I Clerk of Courts RISK Management
664 Wooden table 3' white top I Clerk of Courts/Micro Animal Control
667 Brown Formica cube storage Clerk of Courts/Micro N~P
cabinet 2 door
2of2
IT~M
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS OF SURPLUS PROPERTY
ITEM DISCRllrriON
Formica with 2 drawers
Tan with shade
visitor chairs with arms
sed wood desk 2 drawer
Wooden credenza open middle
metal adjustable stools
rown formica 7 slqelf unit 5' x 2'
Two formica desk risers s__q.v_are
:abric/wood executive chair
Four drawer vertical file with loci(
Four drawer file cabinet
Formica counter
wooden Seating bench
Brown Formica open cabinet
)ressea board riser
2 Metal typewriter stands
series II Printer
4 Drawer vertical file cabinet
2 Drawer file cabinet ~
Monarch jon boat with trailer
911134
84621
FROM TO
Of CO~ Board
Fair Board
lerk of courts
of
lerk of COUrtS
ColleCtOr
;ri( of courts
BCC
Clerk of Courts
:lerk of courts
of Courts
leri( of Courts/Micro
Tax Collector
Collector
~tormwater
mir Board
ltr Board
Fair Board
Fair Board
Fair Board
Fair Board
Fair Board
~diatlon
)cliation
Mediation
Parics & Eec
cleric of courts ___.____
Animal Control
OCPM
r~s & Recrea~
Roaa& Brld e~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
March 18, 1997
FOR BOARD ACTION:
1. ~ertificate of Correction: NEED MOTION authorizing the
chairman to sign Certificate of Correction to the tax rolls
as presented by the Property Appraiser's office. RECOMMEND
APPROVAL.
2. Satisfaction of Lien: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman
~o sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of the Public
Defender for Case Nos. 96-8411-MMA, 94-1499-M~A, 96-3497-M~A,
96-10186-M24A, 96-9929-M)~A, 96-212-M]~A, 96-10059-M]4A,
96-1615-CFA, 96-5393-M]~A, 94-1880-CFB, 88-3S08-M]~A,
90-3485-~ and 89-3363-~. RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
3. Miscellaneous Items to File For Record With Action~
A. Environmental Advisory Board - February 5, 1997 and
agenda for March 5, 1997. Referred to BCC.
B. Historical/Archaeological Preservation Board - February
14, 1997. Referred to BCC.
C. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board - January 3,
January 22, 1997 and agenda for February 26, 1997.
Referred to BCC.
D. Technical Advisory Committee/Citizens Advisory
Committee of the MPO - January 22, 1997 and agenda for
February 26, 1997. Referred to BCC.
AGEND~]TEH
NO. /~
IqAR
EXE~ SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION FOR BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST ELBA DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION AND FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, FORMALLY
SOUTHEAST BANK N.A., TO DRAW ON THE ESCROWED FUNDS i~R THE
REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AT EMBASSY WOODS PHASE I AND EMBASSY
WOODS PHASE II.
For the Board to authorize the County Attorney to commence a ]esal action to recover the
security posted for the completion of the required improvements at Embassy Woods Phase I and
Phase Il.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On July 31, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners entered into a
Construction, Maintenance md Escrow Agreement among Elba Development Corporation,
Collier County and Southeast Bank N.A. in the amount of One Hundred Three Thousand Four
Hundred Ninety-Seven Dollars ($103,497.00) to guarantee the conm'u~on costs for the r~quirod
improvements for Embassy Woods Phase I. Preliminary Acceptamce was granted on November
13, 1990 and the security was reduced to Eighty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Nine
Dollars and Fifty-One Cents ($82,829.51 ).
On August 28, 1990, the County entered into a Construction, Maintenance and Escrow
Agreement among Elba Development Corporation, Collier County and Southeast Balk N.A. in
the amount of Eight Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars and Thirty-
Eight Cents ($824,666.38) to guarantee the construction costs for the required improvements for
Embassy Woods Phase II. Preliminary Accept~ce was granted on June 25, 1991 by Resolution
No. 91475 and the security was reduced to Seventy-Four Thouumd Nine Hundred Sixty-Nine
Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents ($74,969.67).
Final Acceptance has not been granted to the Developer of Embassy Woods Phase I and H. The
estimated costs of bringing Embassy Woods Phase I and Phase Il into compliance with the Land
Development Code is approximately One Hundred Twelve Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-
Seven Dollars and Forty Cents ($I 12,337.40). Although the County has sent letters to the Bank
requesting the remaining escrowed funds, First Union National Bank of Naples, formally
Southeast Bank, N.A. has not delivered the escrowed funds to the County. Staff is
recommending that suit be filed to recover the escrowed funds. (See attached letter from Vincent
A. Cautero to John Boldt - Exhibit "A").
AGENDA ITEM
F..xccudve S~
Embu~ W(~:~ ~hase I & I3
PaSe :2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Internal costs for ill/nS of action ~nd steal'time.
fro~ Fund ii3 and Cost Center {38900.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
File costs $!i0.50.
Costa will be taken
Nolle.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commiasioner~ direct thc County Attorney to commencc a civil action
against Elba Development Corporation and First Union Na/ional Bank of Florida, form~ly
Southeast Bank, N.A. to recover the security posted by the developer for the required
improvements at Embassy Woods Phase I and Embassy Woods Phase H.
Pr~'ed by:
Heidi F. Ashton
Assistant County Attorney
Da~e
Approved by:
David C. Wcigel ~)
County Attorney
?-¢7
f:~exe~.t/ve su'n'~na~/Elba Dr~,eI..,..,.,.--,,t C~e
AGE:N. pAJTF. M.
.o.
I..A 1 1397
pg. '7.,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
John Boldt, P.E., P.S.M.
Stormwater Management Director
Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator/~./
Community Dev. & Environmental Services
February 25, 1997
Embassy Woods
My staff and I have reviewed your memorandum dated February 10,
1997 in which you stated the drainage canal located between the
south boundary of Embassy Woods Phase I and the north right-of-
way line of Davis Boulevard was not excavated in conformance with
the design cross-sections. You have requested from me what
assurances my Divisional staff can make to assure the substandard
work will be corrected before the final phase of the development
is completed.
The following information on Embassy Woods is provided as it
relates to security posted by the Developer, acceptance by the
County status, work remaining to be completed by the Developer,
and action taken by the County to draw on escrowed funds to
complete required improvements:
1. Embassy Woods Phase I - Construction, Maintenance and
Escrow Agreement entered into July 31, 1990, by Elba
Development Corporation, Collier County and Southeast
Bank, N.A. in the amount of $103,497 to guarantee the
construction costs for the remaining improvements.
2. Preliminary Acceptance of Embassy Woods Phase I -
Resolution No. 90-540 granted preliminary acceptance
and reduced the security in the Escrow Agreement to
$82,829.51, Effective Date - November 13, 1990.
Embassy Woods Phase II - Construction, Maintenance and
Escrow Agreement entered into August 28, 1990 by Elba
Development Corporation, Collier County and Southeast
Bank, N.A. in the amount of $824,666.38 to guarantee
the construction costs for the required improvements.
Preliminary Acceptance of Embassy Woods Phase II -
Resolution No. 91-475 granted preliminary acc_~__Dtan~--
AGF. NDA ITEM
?._......., 1 1997
e
and reduced the amount in the Escrow Agreement to
$74,969.67, Effective Date - June 25, ]991.
April 28, 1995 - John Houldsworth provided Elba
Development the required 60 day notice of failure to
comply with Agreement and thereby permit the calling of
the Escrow funds.
e
August 8, 1995 - Letter from John Houldsworth to Heidi
Ashton requesting the necessary action to be taken to
draw the escrow funds.
August 25, 1995 - Letter from Heidi Ashton to First
Union National Bank of Florida (formerly Southeast
Bank, N.A.) requesting a check in the amount of the
total remaining escrow funds to be made out to and sent
to the B.C.C.
September 25, 1995 - Attached is a copy of the memo
from John Houldsworth to Heidi Ashton that provided a
"ballpark" estimate of the cost to bring Embassy Woods
Phase I & II into compliance with the L.D.C.
($112,337.40).
October 19, 1995 - Letter from John Houldsworth to
Heidi Ashton advising her that the Developer intends to
petition the Board for an extension in time to complete
the required improvements.
Note:
The Developer to date, has not proceeded
with this petition. Also, First Union
National Bank of Florida kas not provided the
escrow funds.
Staff has recommended that the County Attorney's Office proceed
with the calling of the escrow funds to complete Phase I and II.
By copy of this letter to the County Attorney's Office, I am
requesting that suit be filed to recover the escrowed funds. In
addition, they have recommended that no additional building
permits be issued to Elba Development Corporation or its
assignees including Glenmore Building Corporation, Montclair
Building Corporation, JMK Industires, Inc., and Saratoga Colony
Building Corporation.
Embassy Woods Phase III was approved by the County on October 8,
1991. To date, this plat has not been recorded. Staff has
recommended that we prohibit the recording of Embassy Woods Phase
III until all deficiencies in Phases I and II are corrected to
the satisfaction of the County.
AGENDA ITEM
N '
For your additional information, staff is in the process of
obtaining ~as-built" cross-sections of the subject drainage canal
in an effort to identify waterway area and resultant capacity of
the as built canal verses the design section. This information
will be shared with you in the hope of resolving this apparent
problem in a timely and cost effective manner.
f/Vt/TK/bk / ~) ohnb
Attachment
cc:
Commissioner Timothy L. Hancock
Commissioner Barbara Berry
Commission Timothy J. Constantine
Commissioner Pamela S. Mac'Kie
Commission John C. Norris
Michael McNees, Acting County Manager
David Weigel, County Attorney
Ray Miller, Acting Public Works Administrator
Donald W. Arnold, AICP, Planning Services Dept. Director
Adolfo Gonzalez, Director, OCPM
Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney
Tom Kuck, Engineering Review Manager
Clyde Fugate, Eng. Inspection Supervisor
John Houldsworth, Senior Engineer
Robert Wiley, Project Manager, OCPM
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Vince Cautero, Administrator
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
John H. Boldt, P.E., P.S.M
Stormwater Management Director
RE: Embassy Woods
Lely Branch Canal
DATE:
February10,1997
The 55 fl. top width canal located in the 80 f~. drainage easement along the north side of
Davis Blvd. on the frontage of the Embassy Woods project was excavated several years
ago by the Developer's Contractor. "As-Built" surveys provided the County in 1994
indicated that the constructed cross-sections did not meet reasonable construction practice
standards for compliance with the design cross-sections. This canal is a integral and
critical part of the Lely Basin system recently approved by the Board for Phase I
implementations. What assurances can you give me that ),our Division staff will make
certain that this sub-standard work 4411 be corrected before the final phase of this
development is completed?
This corrective work should be done during the dry season when canal levels are very Iow
so prompt attention to this manet would be greatly appreciated!
Please call me if you need additional information.
,U-IB/m~
CC:
Commissioner John C. Norris, District #1
Commissioner Timothy J. Constantine, District #3
County Managers' Office
Raymond W. Miller, P.E., Interim Public Works Administrator
Robert C. Wiley, P.E., Project Manager III, O.C.P.M.
Wayne Arnold, Planning Services Director
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E., Engineering Review Services
Clyde Fugate, Engineering Inspection Supervisor
Doc: JHB-0]4
AGENDA ITEM