Agenda 11/14/2017 Item # 9A11/14/2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a
rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development
(RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Cleary RPUD, to allow construction of a
maximum of 63 residential dwelling units or 200 group housing units for seniors on property
located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately one quarter mile east of Logan
Boulevard in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 8.99± acres. [PUDZ-
PL20160001985]
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)
regarding the above referenced petition and to render a decision regarding the petition; and to ensure the
project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's
interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS: The subject 8.99± acre property is currently zoned Rural Agriculture (A). The
petitioner proposes to develop a maximum of 63 single-family, townhouse, or multi-family residences, or
a maximum of 200 units of senior group housing within a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD).
The proposed maximum density is 7 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The proposed maximum floor area
ratio (FAR) for the senior group housing is 0.60.
The Master Plan depicts the area of proposed building, parking, vehicular circulation, water management
area, and preserve. The Master Plan also shows that 5.36 acres shall be residential, 1.07 acres shall be
preserve, 1.0 acre shall be water management, and 1.56 acres shall be buffers/open space. Depending
upon the type of development, a minimum of 30% open space will be provided for group housing and a
minimum of 60% open space will be provided for residential development.
The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned building height of 30 feet and an actual building height of 40
feet for the single-family residences; a maximum zoned building height of 40 feet and an actual building
height of 50 feet for the multi-family residences, and a maximum zoned building height of 45 feet, and an
actual building height of 50 feet for the group housing.
There is a proposed 20-foot wide Type D landscape buffer along Immokalee Road. In addition to the
existing 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer on the Saturnia Lakes property abutting the east property
line, there is another proposed 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer along the east property line for
single-family (and a 30-foot wide Type B buffer for multi-family and group housing). Along
approximately half of the south property line is a proposed 15-foot wide Type B landscape buffer and
then a proposed preserve area adjacent to Saturnia Lakes. Along the west property line a 10 -foot wide
Type A landscape buffer is proposed.
There is one proposed deviation related to FAR. For further information please see the Deviation Section
located on page 13 of the Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) by and of itself will have no
fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its
authorized level of development. If the PUD is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and
the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of
each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the
11/14/2017
Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain
adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of
concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is
required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in
accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected
prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is
generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the
improvements. Please, note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by
staff and the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE):
Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC
heard petition PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary RPUD on October 5, 2017. The CCPC voted 4-2 to
recommend approval of the petition subject to the following revisions to the PUD Document:
- Specify a maximum 35-foot zoned height and a 40-foot actual height for multi-family and/or group
housing building located within 50 feet of the east property line.
- Specify a minimum 30-foot building setback from the east property line, for a 30-foot Type B
landscape buffer.
- Once the multi-family or group housing building is located 50 feet from the east property line,
maximum 45’ zoned and 50’ actual height will apply.
- Construction standards for multi-family and group housing shall include concrete masonry unit
construction, stucco and/or other finishes, and a cement or slate tile roof.
- Specify a minimum of 9’ ceiling heights.
- Specify that the multi-family residences shall not have balconies located adjacent to the east
property line. (Senior group housing is allowed to have balconies adjacent to the east property
line).
- There shall be a concrete paver entrance.
- The entrance shall be gated.
- The word “platted” shall be removed from footnote 4 of the Development Standards Table.
- Notes one and two shall be removed from the Master Plan.
- A generator with a 5-day fuel supply and sound attenuation shall be provided.
- The construction standards shall state “shall” instead of “may.”
- Incorporate the Amenity development standards that were introduced at the CCPC hearing into the
PUD Document.
- Group housing shall be subject to architectural standards in Collier County Land Development
Code section (LDC) 5.05.08.
The Commissioners who voted to deny the petition did so for the following reasons:
- The proposed 50-foot actual height is too tall relative to the existing building heights in Saturnia
Lakes.
- The proposed Cleary PUD intensity and density is too high and is not transitional related to the
existing intensity and density in Saturnia Lakes.
- The .60 FAR is too high especially in light of the fact that it does not provide Medicaid beds. The
requested .60 FAR is not transitional and the .45 FAR for the group housing would have to
provide 150 units of the same size that could have been provided with the .60 FAR at 200 units. In
addition, by not including any Medicaid beds for the higher FAR, they have not met a basic public
service need, and thus it is not justified.
Letters of objection have been received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Regular Agenda.
11/14/2017
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site-specific rezone from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District
to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be kn own as the
Cleary RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with
all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC),
should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory
or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of
the listed criteria below.
Criteria for RPUD Rezones
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval
or not.
1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or
other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such
areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring
the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified
as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future
land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern?
11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of
traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
11/14/2017
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent
property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance
with existing zoning? (a “core” question…)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the
availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service
adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented
through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as
amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the
Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,
safety, and welfare?
The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written
materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies,
letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate
to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has
been approved as to form and legality and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (SAS)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the approval recommendation of the CCPC and further
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approves the request for PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary RPUD subject to the conditions listed under CCPC recommendation, as described in the attached
Ordinance.
Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Zoning Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Staff Report-PUDZ-PL20160001985-Cleary RPUD (PDF)
2. Ordinance - 101917(1) (PDF)
3. Location Map (PDF)
4. Master Plan 10-11-17 (PDF)
5. Future Land Use Element (FLUE Consistency Review 8-24-17 (DOCX)
6. [Linked] NIM Transcript Cleary RPUD (PDF)
7. Letter of Objection from Patrick Neal 9-29-17 signed (PDF)
8. [Linked] Signed 202 Letters of Objection – Saturnia Lakes – Sept 21 2017 (PDF)
9. [Linked] Application for Cleary PUD (PDF)
10. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 3906 (PDF)
11/14/2017
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 9.A
Doc ID: 3906
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve a rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit
Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Cleary RPUD, to allow
construction of a maximum of 63 residential dwelling units or 200 group housing units for seniors on
property located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately one quarter mile east of Logan
Boulevard in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 8.99± acres. [PUDZ-
PL20160001985]
Meeting Date: 11/14/2017
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning
Name: Nancy Gundlach
10/12/2017 8:53 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning
Name: Michael Bosi
10/12/2017 8:53 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 10/12/2017 11:35 AM
Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 10/16/2017 8:46 AM
Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 10/16/2017 9:03 AM
Growth Management Department James French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 10/17/2017 3:59 PM
Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 10/17/2017 4:04 PM
County Attorney's Office Scott Stone Additional Reviewer Completed 10/24/2017 9:17 AM
Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 10/24/2017 10:19 AM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/24/2017 2:16 PM
Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 10/25/2017 10:05 AM
County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 11/01/2017 11:40 AM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 11/14/2017 9:00 AM
AGENDA ITEM 9-B
Co�er County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT -
PLANNING & REGULATION
HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2017
SUBJECT: PETITION PUDZ-PL20160001985, CLEARY RPUD (RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
APPLICANT/OWNER:
Raymond J. Cleary, Jr. and Thomas J. Cleary Family Trust
3120 60th Street SW
Naples, FL 34116
AGENTS:
Mr. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP
Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
REOUESTED ACTION:
Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an Ordinance
of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number
2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), which established the
comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by
amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the
herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned
Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Cleary RPUD, to allow
construction of a maximum of 63 residential dwelling units or 200 group housing units for seniors.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 1 of 15
PROJECT
LOCATION
Immokalee RD
00
d
7
03
Z
Vanderbilt Beach RD - - - --
Location Map
TRACT Lz
irl iC! rI
® I ft ® IQEU
U
Petition Number: PL -2016-1985
Zoning Map
0
TR
Li
TRACT P
SITE
LOCATION
JO!�\IAI
L
IN
IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR846) 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY
20 WID20 WIDDSCAPE BUFFER
SCALE. 1"=100'
_ _
�` ri r r iifiT� r
POTENTIAL TRACT"OS15"
INTERCONNECTION f/ ff fr rf /f rr rf (OPENSPACE, i
D.E AND A. E) i
WATER MANAGEMENT r -
�!r f fif frr rfr ri f ffl ; r ATURNIA LAKES
I I- f f f f fr f f fr rl - 15' L.B.E.
(PB36 PG56)
F ^l
CONCEPTUAL
RESIDENTIAL
I
SITE DATA I I UILDINQ
TOTAL SITE AREA: 8.99± AC
Ill II
RESIDENTIAL 5.36± AC
PRESERVE1.07±AC
WATER MANAGEMENT 1.0±AC
BUFFERS/OPEN SPACE 1.56± AC
t5WIDE 4-1
PUD BOUNDARY.LANDSCAPE li D
BUFFER I A y
ZONE D:A I ^✓.
RIGAS PUD
UNDEVELOPED _ j/ I Iii > w a
RESIDENTIAL
m
10' WIDE TVPE'A' ' ONGEP7{JA.L I m C)
LANDSCAPE BUFFER I RESIDENTIAL li O m
BUILDING
z
� I
I { II l
MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: 63 `
MAXIMUM GROUP HOUSING UNITS: 200
MAXIMUM DENSITY: 7 DU/AC
PRESERVE:
REQUIRED- 1.07± ACRES (7.13± ACRES NATIVE I. CONCEPTUAL III
VEGETATION X 15%) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING I III
PROVIDED -1.07±ACRES I I 1
I 1 I PUD BOUNDARY
OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED _PROVIDED
RESIDENTIAL: 5.4±AC(60%) 5.4±AC(60/) I I\
GROUP HOUSING: 2.71AC(30%) 2.7±AC(30/)
I SATURNIA LAKES
NOTES I „� 15' L.B.E.
(PB36 PG57)
1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS _
SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO . . .
AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. . ., .
2. ALL ACREAGES, EXCEPT PRESERVE, ARE . . . . W -
APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION
AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL IN PRESERVE
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC. w 15' WIDE
3. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE W TYPE'B'
LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER- w LANDSCAPE
EXOTIC REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC . . . , BUFFER
SECTION 4.06.02 AND LDC SECTION 4.06.05.E.1. �J
A
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT \
MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC RIGAS PUO \\\` PPROX.
DISCHARGE
SECTION 3.05.07, A MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE RESIDENTIAL
LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE RESERVED FOR SATURNIA LAKES PLATONE LOCATION
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHICH (PB 36, PG 56-65) 15 WIDE TYPE 'B'
SHALL BE ADDED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE TRACT "OSIS" LANDSCAPE BUFFER I
ON THE DEVELOPMENT SIDE TO ACHIEVE THE (OPEN SPACE, D.E. AND A.E.) II
80% OPACITY REQUIREMENT WITHIN 6 MONTHS i
OF THEISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY.
LEGEND CLEARY RPUD
®iiCBf]yM1IlOP "'p.ni o REVISED
EXHIBIT C 0312312017
enNl, e. �,.an�unwWms Plonnus n�nlNole MASTER PWN
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The 8.99± acre subject property is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately one
quarter mile east of Logan Boulevard in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. (See the
Location Map on page 2.)
The subject 8.99± acre property is currently zoned Rural Agriculture (A). The petitioner proposes to
develop a maximum of 63 single-family, townhouse, or multi -family residences, or a maximum of
200 units of senior group housing within a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD). The
proposed maximum density is 7 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The proposed floor area ratio
(FAR) for the senior group housing is 0.60.
The Master Plan, located on the previous page of this Staff Report, depicts the area of proposed
building, parking, vehicular circulation, water management area, and preserve. The Master Plan also
shows that 5.36 acres shall be residential, 1.07 acres shall be preserve, 1.0 acre shall be water
management, and 1.56 acres shall be buffers/open space. Depending upon the type of development,
a minimum of 30% open space is provided for group housing and a minimum of 60% open space has
been provided for residential development.
The petitioner proposes a maximum zoned building height of 30 feet and an actual building height of
40 feet for the single-family residences; a zoned building height of 40 feet and an actual building
height of 50 feet for the multi -family residences, and a zoned building height of 45 feet, and an
actual building height of 50 feet for the group housing.
There is a proposed 20 -foot wide Type D landscape buffer along Immokalee Road. In addition to
the existing 15 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer at Saturnia Lakes along the east property line, is
another proposed 15 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer. Along approximately half of the south
property line is a proposed 15 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer and then a proposed preserve area
adjacent to Saturnia Lakes. Along the west property line a 10 -foot wide Type A landscape buffer is
proposed.
There is one proposed deviation related to FAR. For further information please see the Deviation
Section of this Staff Report located on page 13.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: Immokalee Road, a 6 -lane road, and then a residential development with a zoning
designation of H.D. Development Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a density of 2.42 units per
acre and a maximum zoned height of 42 feet
East: Entrance Road, and then single-family residences in Saturnia Lakes, with a zoning designation
of Rigas PUD with a density of 3.13 units per acre and a maximum height of 50 feet
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 4 of 15
South: Natural vegetation, and then single-family residences in Saturnia Lakes, with a zoning
designation of Rigas PUD with a density of 3.13 units per acre and a maximum height of 50 feet
West: Undeveloped land with a zoning designation of A (Agriculture)
AERIAL PHOTO
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The proposed PUD rezone is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See
attached Exhibit C: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review dated August 24, 2017.
Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact
Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP) using the 2016 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR).
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001986
September 21, 2017
Page 5 of 15
Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states:
"The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications,
conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with
consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not
approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as
identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient
as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or
adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an
adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific
mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if
the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur:
a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal
to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume;
b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or
exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and
c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is
equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume.
Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and
submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant
impacts on all roadways. "
The proposed RPUD on the subject property was reviewed based on the applicable 2016 AUIR
Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed new
development will generate a maximum of approximately 85 PM peak hour, two-way trips, on the
adjacent roadway segments. The proposed development will impact the following roadway
segments with the listed capacities:
Roadway
Link
2016 AUIR
Current Peak Hour Peak
2016 Remaining
Existing LOS
Direction Service
Capacity
Volume/Peak Direction
Immokalee Roac
Logan Boulevard to
D
3,200/East
637
Collier Boulevard
Immokalee Roac
Logan Boulevard to I-
D
3,500/East
616
75
Logan Boulevarc
Immokalee Road to
C
1,000/North
380
Vanderbilt Beach Roa
Based on the 2016 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the
current and proposed (reduced) trips for the amended project within the five year planning period.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 6 of 15
Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation
Element of the GMP.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning Staff found
this project to be consistent with the COME. The project site consists of 7.13 acres of native
vegetation; a minimum of 1.07 (15%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under
preservation and dedicated to Collier County.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.S.,
Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and
Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as
"Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The
CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the
criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is
discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition,
staff offers the following analysis:
Utility Review: Public Utilities Department staff has reviewed the petition and recommends
approval.
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
Document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require Environmental
Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development
project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances.
The PUD Master Plan provides 1.07 acres of Preserve, which meets the minimum requirement of
fifteen (15%) in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07.B. There were no listed species observed on
the site. However, bear nuisance calls have been documented within the vicinity of the subject
property. Therefore, a commitment requiring a Bear Management Plan with the SDP and/or Plat has
been included.
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff finds this project consistent with Policy 5.1 of
the Transportation Element of the GMP.
Zoning and Land Development Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible
with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the
requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the
subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and
densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass,
building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location.
Staff believes that the proposed development will be compatible with and complementary to the
surrounding land uses. Staff offers the following analysis of this project:
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 7 of 15
The land across Immokalee Road and to the north of the proposed 8.99± acre senior group care
housing or residential units is developed with single-family dwelling units at a density of 2.42 units
per acre and a maximum height of 42 feet. The land to the east is Saturnia Lakes, developed with a
15 -foot wide Type B landscape buffer, an entrance road, a lake and then single-family homes. A
150 -foot wide preserve area on the subject site and 50 feet of natural vegetation separates the single-
family dwelling units to the south at Saturnia Lakes from the proposed development. The
permissible maximum height of 50 feet at Saturnia Lakes is similar to the proposed maximum height
of 45 feet at Cleary PUD.
While the proposed Cleary RPUD density is higher than the adjacent PUD's, it is similar to the more
recently approved PUD's along the Immokalee Road corridor:
- Addie's Comer PUD - 11.45 units per acre
- Tree Farm PUD — 7.22 units per acre
- Abaco Club PUD — 6.54 units per acre
The combination of existing and proposed landscape buffers along with the preserve area and natural
vegetation mitigates for the proposed higher density of the Cleary RPUD. Therefore, the proposed
development is compatible with the existing development in the area.
Zoning staff recommends that this petition be found compatible with, and complementary to, the
surrounding land uses, pursuant to the requirement of FLUE Policy 5.4.
LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show
that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the
Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the additional
criteria as also noted below: Rezone findings are designated as RZ and PUD findings are designated
as PUD. (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in non -bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
The Comprehensive Planning section has indicated that the proposed PUD rezone is consistent with
all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the
zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as single-
family residential and agricultural. Staff is on the opinion that the land uses proposed in this PUD
petition will not create incompatibility issues.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 8 of 15
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The subject parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It
is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions
on the property proposed for change.
The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3 above.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The proposed amendment is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC
provisions to seek such the amendment to allow the owner the opportunity to develop the land with
uses other than what the existing Agricultural zoning district would allow.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD rezone, with the commitments made by the applicant,
can been deemed consistent with the County's land use policies upon adoption that are reflected by
the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed
PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the
development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. The
project is subject to the Transportation Commitments contained in the PUD ordinance.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to
the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Staff is of the opinion that this PUD rezone will not adversely impact property values. Zoning by
itself may or may not affect values, since market demand drives value determination.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 9 of 15
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The property surrounding the subject site is partially developed. The basic premise underlying all of
the development (SDP) standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with
the SDP approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in
zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore,
the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed PUD rezone does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the
FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans
are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property can be developed within existing zoning. The petitioner is seeking this
rezone in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and
action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed
rezone meets the intent of the PUD district, and further, believes the public interest will be
maintained.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD rezone is not out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or County.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
There may be other sites in the county that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is
not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition
was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; staff does not review
other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would
be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and the proposed
development site will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the building permit process.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 10 of 15
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate
Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the
GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has
concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts of the Level
of Service will be minimized.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning
Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following
criteria:"
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
The nearby area is developed with, or is approved for, development of a similar nature. The
petitioner will be required to comply with all County regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water,
and other utilities. In addition, the commitments included in PUD Exhibit F adequately address the
impacts from the proposed development.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may
relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance
of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office
(CAO), demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required
to gain platting and/or SDP approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the
provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the
developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP.
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives,
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff
is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 11 of 15
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
As described in the Staff Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the
proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation
Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development
order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for
all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable
concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any
plats and or site development plans, are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable
water supplies to accommodate this project. Furthermore, adequate public facilities requirements
will be addressed when development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the
most similar conventional zoning district.
The petitioner is seeking one deviation to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose
and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A). This criterion
requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this
PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional
zoning district. Staff believes that the deviation proposed can be supported, finding that, in
compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may
be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC
Section 10.02.13 13.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 12 of 15
Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive
examination of the deviation.
Deviation Discussion:
The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is directly
extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is
outlined below.
Proposed Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 which establishes a maximum
FAR of 0.45 for group housing to instead permit a maximum FAR of 0.60.
Petitioner's Justification: The petitioner states the following in support of the deviation:
Modern senior housing projects provide a significant array of recreational amenities, which when
provided within the building increases the total square footage of the structure; therefore,
increasing the FAR. Newer senior housing projects also provide more spacious interior living
space, necessitating a larger FAR.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
APPROVAL, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health safety and
welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that
the deviation is "justified as meeting public pumoses to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations."
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on April 26, 2017. For further
information, please see Exhibit C: "Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting. "
Over 200 residents from the neighboring Saturnia Lakes community have signed petitions objecting
to the proposed Cleary PUD. Please see Exhibit D: Saturnia Lakes - Petitions. "
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary RPUD revised on September 18, 2017.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission
forward Petition PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary PUD to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 13 of 15
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Proposed PUD Ordinance
Exhibit B: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review
Exhibit C: Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting
Exhibit D: Saturnia Lakes — Petitions (Note: Only the cover letter, map and one example of a
signed petition has been attached. The petitions are all the same, but they are signed by 200
individual residents.
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 21, 2017
Page 14 of 15
PREPARED BY:
AMA I Alla
NANCY H, AICP, PLA
PRINCIP L ER
ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
REVIEWED BY:
RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
MIKE BOSI, AIC?, DIRECTOR
ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
APPROVED BY:
4-
GROWTH
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Cleary RPUD, PUDZ-PL20160001985
September 6, 2017
Page 15 of 15
q 7 1-7
ATE
R -Y-n
DATE
e-?ai//7
DATE
ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A)
ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE
PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE CLEARY RPUD, TO
ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 63
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS OR 200 GROUP
HOUSING UNITS FOR SENIORS ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE QUARTER MILE EAST
OF LOGAN BOULEVARD IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONSISTING OF 8.99+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., and
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Raymond
J. Cleary, Jr., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification
of the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 28,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Rural
Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a
11/19/17
Cleary RPUD
06J
PUDZ-PL20160001985 Page 1
project to be known as the Cleary RPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 63 residential
dwelling units or 200 group housing units for seniors, in accordance with Exhibits A through F
attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps,
as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2017.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
An
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Scott A. Stone
Assistant County Attorney
By:
PENNY TAYLOR, Chairman
Exhibit A: Permitted Uses
Exhibit B: Development Standards
Exhibit C: Master Plan
Exhibit D: Legal Description
Exhibit E: Requested Deviations from LDC
Exhibit F: Developer Commitments
11/19/17
Cleary RPUD
PUDZ-PL20160001985 Page 2 dJ
EXHIBIT A
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
Regulations for development of the Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in
accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth
Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said
regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the
provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply.
PERMITTED USES:
A maximum development density of 63 residential dwelling units or 200 units of group housing
for seniors shall be permitted within the RPUD. Construction of more than 36 residential
dwellings requires the developer to demonstrate that they have transferred 1 dwelling unit per
acre from Sending Lands consistent with the infill provisions of the Future Land Use Element and
Exhibit F.2 of this PUD document. The FAR shall govern group housing units. No building or
structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for
other than the following:
MIXED USE:
A. Principal Uses:
1. Group housing for seniors including assisted living, continuing care retirement
communities, skilled nursing, memory care and independent living facilities at an FAR
of up to 0.6 (See Exhibit A Item C, Operational Requirements for Group Housing and
Exhibit E, Deviation #1);
2. Residential Dwelling Units
a. Single-family, including detached, zero lot line, two family and duplex;
b. Townhouse;
C. Multi -family;
3. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses as determined
by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner.
B. Accessory Uses:
1. Garages and/or carports.
2. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures.
3. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the developer and
developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access
ways, parking areas, and related uses, subject to the procedures for a temporary use
permit provided in the LDC.
4. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences
and walls.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 1 of 12 October 19, 2017
5. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this
RPUD, including recreational facilities, such as swimming pool, clubhouse, fitness
center and maintenance facilities.
6. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses, consistent
with the permitted uses for this RPUD, as determined by the Board of Zoning
Appeals (BZA) or the Hearing Examiner.
C. Operational Requirements for Group Housing
Group housing for seniors uses shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the
following operational standards:
1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older.
2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents.
3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes
of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may
be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to
medical office visits.
4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with
their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for
arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music
and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse.
5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs
shall be provided for the residents.
6. Each unit shall have the option to be equipped to notify the community staff in
the event of medical or other emergency.
7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical
impairments (handicaps) as required by the applicable building codes and
federal law and regulation.
8. There shall be an emergency generator to serve the project with sufficient fuel
supply for 5 days. The generator shall be equipped with a noise attenuation
device or shall be enclosed.
PRESERVE
A. Allowable Uses:
1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve
area to be retained.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 2 of 12 October 19, 2017
2. Mitigation for environmental permitting, as per LDC requirements.
3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements.
4. Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 3 of 12 October 19, 2017
EXHIBIT B
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL
Exhibits B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Cleary RPUD. Standards not specifically
set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the
SDP or subdivision plat.
STANDARDS
SINGLE
FAMILY
DETACHED
SINGLE
FAMILY ZERO
LOT LINE
TOWNHOUSE
TWO
FAMILY &
DUPLEX
MULTI-
FAMILY
GROUP
HOUSING
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
Minimum Lot Area
5,000 SF
4,000 SF
1,600 SF
1,600 SF
10,000 SF
N/A
Minimum Lot Width
50 feet
40 feet
16 feet
16 feet
100 feet
N/A
Minimum Lot Depth
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
N/A
N/A
Minimum Front Yard Setback(')
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
Minimum Side Yard Setback
5 feet
0/5 feet(')
0 feet
0 or 5 feet
15 feet
15 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback (4)
15 feet
15 feet
15 feet
15 feet
20 feet
20 feet
Minimum PUD Boundary Setback
East
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30 feet(6)
30 feet(6)
Maximum Building Height (5)
Zoned
Actual
30 feet
40 feet
30 feet
40 feet
30 feet
40 feet
30 feet
40 feet
40 feet
50 feet
45 feet
50 feet
Minimum Distance Between
Structures
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
Greater of
20 feet or
Y2 BH
Greater of
20 feet or
BH
Minimum Floor Area
1,250 SF
1,250 SF
1,250 SF
1,250 SF
1,000 SF
N/A
Minimum Preserve Setback
25 feet
25 feet
25 feet
25 feet
25 feet
25 feet
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES(3)
Minimum Front Yard Setback(')
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
15 feet
15 feet
Minimum Side Yard Setback
5 feet
0 feet (Z)
0 feet (Z)
0 feet (�)
15 feet
15 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback (4)
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
15 feet
15 feet
Minimum PUD Boundary Setback
East
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30 feet(6)
30 feet(')
Minimum Preserve Setback
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
Minimum Distance Between
Structures
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
Maximum Building Height
Zoned
Actual
25 feet
30 feet
25 feet
30 feet
25 feet
30 feet
25 feet
30 feet
35 feet
45 feet
35 feet
45 feet
BH: Building Height — Zoned
Measured to edge of pavement or back of curb (single-family front entry garages shall have a 23' setback from back of sidewalk).
�) Must be at least 10 feet between structures.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 4 of 12 October 19, 2017
0) Structures such as gatehouses, walls and decorative architectural treatments shall have no setback from property line.
All landscape Buffer Easements and/or Lake Maintenance Easements shall be located within open space tracts or lake tracts and not be
within a residential lot. Where a home site abuts a Landscape Buffer Easement or Lake Maintenance Easement within open space tracts
or lake tracts, the accessory structure setback on the residential lot may be reduced to zero (0) feet where it abuts the easement.
0) Any multi -family or group housing structure constructed between 30' and 50' from the PUD's eastern boundary shall be limited to a zoned
height of 35' and an actual height of 40'.
le) A 30' landscape buffer shall be provided within the setback.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 5 of 12 October 19, 2017
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR AMENITY AREA
STANDARDS
AMENITY AREA
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
Minimum Lot Area
N/A
Minimum Front Yard Setback
N/A
Minimum Side Yard Setback
N/A
Minimum Rear Yard Setback(')
N/A
Minimum Preserve Setback
25 feet
Minimum PUD Boundary Setback
East
South
West
30 feet
100 feet
20 feet
Minimum Distance Between Structures
N/A
Minimum Floor Area
N/A
Maximum Building Height
Zoned
Actual
30 feet
35 feet
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES()
Minimum Front Yard Setback
20 feet
Minimum Side Yard Setback
10 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback(2)
N/A
Minimum Preserve Setback
10 feet
Minimum PUD Boundary Setback
East
South
West
30 feet
100 feet
20 feet
Minimum Distance Between Structures
10 feet
Maximum Building Height
Zoned
Actual
25 feet
30 feet
BH: Building Height—Zoned
Structures such as gatehouses, walls and decorative architectural treatments shall have no setback from property line.
z> Landscape Buffer Easements and/or Lake Maintenance Easements shall be located within open space tracts or lake tracts and not be within
a residential lot. Where a home site abuts a Landscape Buffer Easement or Lake Maintenance Easement within open space tracts or lake
tracts, the accessory structure setback on the residential lot may be reduced to zero (0) feet where it abuts the easement.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 6 of 12 October 19, 2017
IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR846) 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY
WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
N
o sa lar
SCALE: V= 100'
rr7�i i r r r r
POTENTIAL G rr rr rr rr rr rr Q I I TRACT "OS15"
INTERCONNECTION I rr /r rr rr rr rr rr I I I (OPEN SPACE,
WATER MANAGEMENT /I I D.E. AND A.E.)
r r r r TYPES'
11 rr rr rr LANDSCAPE I �
U rr rr rr BUFFER r I I
c.,m ",���..,�n ,..„„u.. rA. CLEARY RPUD
®GradyMlnOr ” n.w a.. REVISED
a �w "� "1"a' EXHIBIT C 10/10/2017
fnn engmees Lana surve,n Ptannetc LandafapecApchllecLv MASTER PIAN
w 000.e �" wµw � > �•• eao.reeo
SAT15BNIALEAKES
Y
I i (P636 PG56)
I
CONCEPTUAL
-I ;/
RESIDENTIAL
I
SITE DATA
I
C
BUILDING
I
TOTAL SITE AREA: 8.99± AC
MULTI -FAMILY AND
I
I I
RESIDENTIAL 5.36±ACI
GROUP
HOUSITMG - 306' WIDE
PRESERVE1.07± AC
WATER MANAGEMENT 1.0± AC
BUFFERS/OPEN SPACE 1.56± AC I
BUF ERPF
I
SINGLE FAMILY - 15'
I
(
WIDETYPE'B'
I
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
PUD BOUNDARY
f v
I
D
ZONED: A
UNDEVELOPED
m - RIGAS PUD
I w
rn RESIDENTIAL
10' WIDE TYPE'A'
AL CONCEPTU
m
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
RESIDENTIAL
I
0 m
I
BUILDING
I
m ` a
I
o m
I I ; I
MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: 63 I
I
MAXIMUM GROUP HOUSING UNITS: 200
MAXIMUM DENSITY: 7 DU/AC I
I I
PRESERVE:
I
Ii
REQUIRED - 1.07± ACRES (7.13± ACRES NATIVE
CONCEPTUAL
I
VEGETATION X 15%)I
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
I '
PROVIDED - 1.07± ACRES
PUD BOUNDARY
I
OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED PROVIDED
1
RESIDENTIAL: 5.4± AC (60%) 5.4t AC (60%)
I
GROUP HOUSING: 2.7± AC (30%) 2.7± AC (30%)
I
SATURNIA LAKES
I I
I
(PB36 PG57)
NOTES
W
.
. PRESERVE "
1. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE
`
..
15' WIDE
TYPE'B'
LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER.
W
. ...
LANDSCAPE
EXOTIC REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC
• •
• • ..
I - BUFFER
SECTION 4.06.02 AND LDC SECTION 4.06.05.E.1.
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT
_
�J
MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC
RIGAS PUD
APPROX. 1
SECTION 3.05.07. A MINIMUM 6 -FOOT WIDE
RESIDENTIAL
DISCHARGE
1
LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE RESERVED FOR
SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE
LOCATION
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHICH
(PB 36, PG 56-65)
15' WIDE TYPE 'B'
SHALL BE ADDED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE
TRACT "OSIS"
LANDSCAPE BUFFER '
ON THE DEVELOPMENT SIDE TO ACHIEVE THE
(OPEN SPACE, D.E. AND A.E.)
80% OPACITY REQUIREMENT WITHIN 6 MONTHS
OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE
I
OF OCCUPANCY.
c.,m ",���..,�n ,..„„u.. rA. CLEARY RPUD
®GradyMlnOr ” n.w a.. REVISED
a �w "� "1"a' EXHIBIT C 10/10/2017
fnn engmees Lana surve,n Ptannetc LandafapecApchllecLv MASTER PIAN
w 000.e �" wµw � > �•• eao.reeo
EXHIBIT D
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
PARCEL 1
(OR 2651, PG 2615)
THE WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE
1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 2
(OR 2216, PG 252)
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER AND STATE OF FLORIDA
PARCELS 1 & 2 CONTAINING 8.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS COMBINED
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 8 of 12 October 19, 2017
EXHIBIT E
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS
1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 which establishes a maximum FAR of 0.45 for
group housing to instead permit a maximum FAR of 0.60.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 9 of 12 October 19, 2017
EXHIBIT F
FOR
CLEARY RPUD
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
1. ENVIRONMENTAL
a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation. 7.13± acres of native
vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 1.07± acres (7.13 x .15 =
1.07) of native vegetation to be retained.
b. A management plan for Florida black bear shall be submitted for review and approval at
time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable.
C. The portion of the 30 -foot ROW easement within the preserve will need to be vacated or
released prior to final plat or SDP approval, whichever is applicable.
2. PLANNING
TDR credits shall be utilized in accordance with the requirements of LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.g.
A maximum of 63 dwelling units are permitted in the PUD, of which 36 units are derived from
the allowable base density and 27 units are derived from density bonus; of the density bonus, 9
units shall be derived from TDR Credits severed and transferred from Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District Sending Lands consistent with the provisions of the Collier County Growth Management
Plan.
Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits (beginning
with the 37th unit), a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the developer
has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet
tracks the chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development
orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all
TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance).
3. PUD MONITORING
One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-
out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until
close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Raymond J. Cleary,
Jr., 3120 60th Street SW, Naples, FL 34116. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the
monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally
binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After
such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of
the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As
Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 10 of 12 October 19, 2017
that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner
and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity,
but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the
PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and
fulfillment of PUD commitments.
4. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the
part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create
any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain
requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. (Section 125.022, FS)
b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
5. TRANSPORTATION
a. The project shall be limited to a maximum of 85 PM peak hour two-way trips.
6. LANDSCAPING
a. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in
accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings
with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. A minimum 6 -
foot wide landscape buffer must be reserved for additional landscape material which shall be
added outside of the preserve on the development side to achieve the 80% opacity
requirement within 6 months of the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.
7. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
a. Buildings shall be constructed out of concrete/masonry construction, with stucco and/or
other finishes.
b. Roofs shall be cement or slate tile materials, or other approved equivalent as approved
by the County Manager or his designee.
c. Ceiling heights shall be a minimum of 9'.
d. The project shall utilize concrete pavers at the project entrance.
e. The project shall be gated.
f. Multi -family buildings are prohibited from having balconies on the east facing building
facade adjacent to the eastern PUD boundary.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 11 of 12 October 19, 2017
g. Group housing for seniors will be subject to architectural standards in Section 5.05.08 of
the LDC.
Cleary RPUD Exhibits A-F_v8.docx Page 12 of 12 October 19, 2017
Immokalee RD
Logan BLVD NVanderbilt Beach RD
I
75IMMOKALEE ROAD
SAT
URNI
A
L
AKES
B
L
V
DJOHN MICHAEL ROADLEAFSHINE LANE
BUTTERFLY PALM DRIVEBARRIGONA COURTTRIANDRA LANES AT U R N I A G R A N DE DR I VELANTANA CIRCLELANTANA CIRCLE
LANTANA WAY
44
45 43
46 42
47 41
48 40
49 39
50 38
51 37TRL15236
53 35
54 34 TRACT OS1
55 33
3256
57 273128293058
59
60
61
1817 201962
1663TRACT OS15 156411288111111314658987
1311066114908667121151099185681192108116846910107931178370994106TRACT X82118 810595817111910496807120172103977912173610298781227457710199123100754124763125
TRACT R
TRACT P
TRACT O1
TRAC T L2 TR O3X7X14X17X6 À44
À45 À43
À46 À42
À47 À41
À48 À40
À49 À39
À50 À38À1
À51 À37
À52 À36
À53 À1À35
À54 À34
À55 À33
À56X3X20 À32X4X16
À57
À58 À27À31À28À29À30
À59
À60
À18À17 À20À19 À21À61
À62
À63 À16
À64 À15
À112 À14À65À88À111À87À113À89À13À110À66
À114 À90 À67 À12À109
À85À115À91 À68 À11À108
À116 À84À92 À69 À10À107X22
X25
À83À93À117 À70 À9À106À82À94À118
À81 À8À105À71À95À119
À104 À80À96 À7À120À72À103À79À97À121À6À102À73À78À98À122À5À101À74À77À99À123
À4À100À75À124
À3À125À76
X52 À86
À22
À23
À24
À25
À26
À27
À28
À29 À30
À31
À32
À33 À34
À35
À36 À37
À38À103À104À105À106À107À108À109À110À111
À112
À113
À114À115À116À117À118À119À120À121À122
À1À1
DRI
RPUD
PUD
A
A
PUD
HERITAGEGREENS
RIGAS
H.D.DEVELOPMENT
OLDE CYPRESS
Location Map Zoning Map
Petition Number: PL-2016-1985
PROJEC TLOCATION
SITELOCATION
¹
‒ 1 ‒
Growth Management Department
Zoning Division
C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M
To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section
From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section
Date: August 24, 2017
Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review of Proposed Cleary Residential Planned
Unit Development (4th memo)
PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ-PL20160001985 [REV: 4]
PETITION NAME: Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
REQUEST: This petition requests a PUD rezone affecting a ±9.0-acre property from the A,
Agricultural zoning district to the Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development to allow residential
development (up to 63 dwelling units) or a senior housing facility (up to 200 units), with associated
amenities (recreational uses) and open spaces.
LOCATION: The property is located approximately one-quarter mile east of Logan Boulevard, on the
south side of Immokalee Road, and west of the Saturnia Lakes residential PUD, in Section 28, Township
48 South, Range 26 East.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Urban
designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the
Countywide Future Land Use Map and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth
Management Plan (GMP).
Relative to this petition, the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows residential uses at a base density of
4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). Also, as explained below, this site is potentially eligible for a 3 DU/A
density bonus if qualifying as “infill” development, thereby potentially yielding a total eligible density
of 7 DU/A.
FLUE provisions for the Density Rating System state, “Residential In-fill: To encourage residential in-fill
in urban areas of existing development outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area, a maximum of 3
residential dwelling units per gross acre may be added if the following criteria are met [staff analysis
follows in bracketed text]: [The subject site is not in the Coastal High Hazard Area]
(a) The project is 20 acres or less in size; [the site comprises ±9 acres]
(b) At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer; [County
water and wastewater services are available to serve this area]
(c) The project is compatible with surrounding land uses; [this determination is made by Zoning
Services staff in their review of the petition in its entirety]
‒ 2 ‒
(d) The property in question has no common site development plan with adjacent property; [The
subject property has no common site development plan with adjacent property]
(e) There is no common ownership with any adjacent parcels; [The subject property is not in
common ownership with adjacent properties]
(f) The parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in-fill residential density
bonus and was created prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management
Plan on January 10, 1989; [The subject property consists of two parcels which have been
separate properties from approximately 1976 to present]
(g) Of the maximum 3 additional units, one (1) dwelling unit per acre shall be transferred from
Sending Lands; and, [this commitment is included in Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments,
specifying that the first DU/A (9 units) over the base density of 4 DU/A (36 units) will be
derived from TDR credits]
(h) Projects qualifying under this provision may increase the density administratively by a
maximum of one dwelling unit per acre by transferring that additional density from Sending
Lands”. [the County’s regulations provide for this density increase via a rezone of the property]
This PUD proposes 63 dwelling units yielding a density of 7.01 DU/A (8.99 acres x 7 DU/A eligible
density = 62.93 63 DUs), recreational uses and open space, and up to 200 senior housing units.
FLUE Policy 5.10_ allows group housing uses in the Urban designated area subject to provisions of
the Collier County Land Development Code.
To promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier
County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment
projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold italicized text].
Objective 7:
Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing
development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows:
Policy 7.1:
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating
intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts Immokalee
Road, a major arterial roadway. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a single, direct access to
Immokalee Road.]
Policy 7.2:
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle
congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit
C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a private hammer-head cul-de-sac street inside the project. All
vehicular traffic accesses Immokalee Road directly at a single access point.]
Policy 7.3:
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use
type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of
the Transportation Element. [The site abuts a road on one side ‒ Immokalee Road on the north.
Property located to the east and south is fully developed [Saturnia Lakes], with no
‒ 3 ‒
interconnection points proposed. An interconnection point with the abutting property to the
west is proposed, where there is potential for residential development. Further west, on the far
side of the large residential lot, an interconnection point is proposed by the adjacent
commercial development that is now under consideration (proposed Logan/Immokalee
Commercial Planned Unit Development).]
Policy 7.4:
The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of
densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to
walkable communities, the PUD requests two Deviations from the Land Development Code
(LDC) – for an increased floor area ratio (FAR) for senior housing uses, and reduced usable open
space, if developed with a senior housing facility – which do not remove or alter the provision
of sidewalks. The project will be subject to LDC requirements for provision of sidewalks.
One non-vehicular interconnection shares the “potential” vehicular interconnection point with
the abutting property to the west. Pedestrian/bike connections are provided to Immokalee
Road.
As to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the PUD provides for single-
family detached, attached and zero lot line, two-family & duplex residences, townhouses and
multi-family residences.
Common open spaces are provided by more than 3.6 acres of open space including water
management lakes, recreational/amenity areas and other open spaces. The PUD requests a
Deviation from the Land Development Code (LDC) – for reducing the required usable open
space from 60% to 30% of the site – if the project is developed with group housing for seniors
only. No civic facilities are provided for.]
Based upon the above analysis, the PUD may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section
David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section
Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division
G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2017
\\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2017\PUDZ\PUDZ-PL2016-1985 Cleary R4 Con Rev_FNL.docx
1
TRANSCRIPT OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
CLEARY RPUD
APRIL 26, 2017
Appearances:
RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ.
WAYNE ARNOLD
JIM BANKS
RAY BELLOWS
SHARON UMPENHOUR
2
MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you all for coming.
What we're doing tonight is a neighborhood
information meeting for a project, and I'm assuming
most of you people are from Saturnia Lakes. Am I
close in my guess?
Okay. So it's near your project or where you
live. This is your project right here. This is
the nine acres we're going to be talking about
tonight.
And what we do is, one of the county
processes, whenever we do a land-use petition,
we're required to have a neighborhood information
meeting to allow the neighbors and the community
around us to know what we're doing. So you can ask
any questions you want. We'll do our best to
answer any questions you have.
If you've got concerns, we'll listen to your
concerns, obviously, and try to incorporate as many
of them as we can, if we can incorporate them into
the project.
But what the county does as part of the
process is we have a neighborhood information
meeting right after we get our first round of
county comments on our petition.
The next step after this would be to resubmit
3
the response to the county comments. We would then
have a hearing in front of the Collier County
Planning Commission, which makes a recommendation
to the Board of County Commissioners.
Then, ultimately, the Board of County
Commissioners will make the decision on whether or
not to approve this process.
So there are a team of people here to discuss
the petition and answer any questions.
My name is Richard Yovanovich, and I am the
land-use attorney representing the property owner.
Wayne Arnold and Sharon Umpenhour with Grady Minor
are the planning team, engineering team for the
project, and they can answer any questions I can't
answer. And Jim Banks is our transportation
consultant to the project and can answer any
questions regarding transportation concerns you may
have if I can't answer them.
So, we'll explain the project to you as to
what we're doing, and then we will open it up to
you to answer any questions you may have, but the
project is this nine-acre piece right here. It's
owned by the Clearys. It's basically two pieces,
which they've owned for a few years now. It's a
total of approximately nine acres.
4
We're in what the county calls the urban area.
So it's where development is supposed to be
occurring in Collier County. Based upon the
current comprehensive plan, it's supposed to be
developed for residential or senior housing. Those
are the types of uses that are, under the
comprehensive plan, to go here. It's not supposed
to be any type of commercial development that's
supposed to go on this type of property.
So our request is for either residential, with
a maximum number of 65 units, or senior housing,
independent assisted living type of facilities on
the property, at a floor area ratio of .6, not to
exceed 200 units for senior-related housing.
Under the county's comprehensive plan, the
base density for most projects is four units an
acre. However, for projects less than 20 acres in
size, because they're smaller and they're infill
pieces, you can ask for up to three additional
units per acre as long as you agree to buy what
they call transfer development rights, which is
basically out a little bit further east here, the
county has set up a program where they have sending
lands and receiving lands.
Sending lands, basically, have to be
5
preserved. In (indiscernible) the county gave
those people who want sending lands (indiscernible)
transfer development rights.
So certain lands, you can transfer those
development lands to, and it's the smaller parcels
of the urban area that you can do that.
So if we want to go above four units per acre,
we would have to buy additional density to get up
to a maximum of 65 units that we're asking for on
the site.
We run the gamut of residential. We can do
single family, we can do duplexes, we can do
multifamily as far as the options that we have on
this piece of property.
And then, again, they consider senior housing
to be an institutional type of use. It doesn't
really fit the typical residential. If you've gone
down Vanderbilt Beach Road, you'll see Sandalwood
and Bradford Square, right. We did both -- Wayne
and I did both of those. Those are independent
living facilities.
The typical -- the typical ratio for senior
housing versus regular housing is a 4 to 1 ratio.
Obviously, we're not asking for 260 units, but
that's the typical ratio because most people that
6
move in there, the average age is at least 78 or
older. Even though it says you have to be 55,
minimum, it's usually a little older. They usually
start with a car, but they never really drive the
car because transportation is provided in those
types of facilities.
So the reason (indiscernible) is because the
traffic really equates to about 4 to 1 when we're
talking about going to a regular senior -- senior
housing versus regular residential.
The way -- here's our proposed master plan,
and at this point we really don't know whether it's
going to be either multifamily, single family or
the senior housing, but what we've done --
obviously, this is Saturnia Lakes here and here.
We're required to maintain 15 percent of our
native vegetation in the preserve area. We have
put the preserve area on the south side. I'm
directionally challenged, so sometimes I get my
north and south backwards, but the south side of
the property, so it will serve as, basically, a
buffer to the residences that are on this
cul-de-sac right here in Saturnia Lakes.
Our development standards for single family,
which most of you, I think -- I don't know if you
7
have any multifamily in Saturnia Lakes or not. I
know the zoning allowed for it, but I don't think
it was built, but the single-family development
standards in our project are 30 feet zone type,
which is if you have a pitched roof, basically,
it's to the midpoint of the roof, 40 feet actual,
which is tippy top of the roof, and then if it's
multifamily, it's 45 -- it's 40 feet zoned, 50 feet
tippy top. And then if we do the senior housing,
it would be 45 feet zoned, 50 feet tippy top. So
the peak of the roof, the tallest thing on the
building would be 50 feet for the group housing,
senior housing, 45 feet -- I'm sorry. 50 feet for
multifamily and then 40 feet for single family.
Obviously, our accesses are going to be off of
Immokalee Road. We are proposing our access to be
on the west side of the property. The county is
going to require us to share access with the
property owner to the west.
So as you can see on our master plan, we've
prepared for that. So we'll have an access off of
Immokalee Road. I don't think we'll get a left in.
We'll probably just get a right in, right out off
of Immokalee Road.
We'll share access with this piece right here.
8
And our water management would be up front with our
preserve on the back, and then we'll have buffers
around the entirety of the site, landscape buffers
that essentially are a six-foot tall hedge which
serves -- basically, you won't be able to see
through the hedge. I think we're required
(indiscernible) opaque within a year, I believe it
is, to six feet (indiscernible).
It's really a pretty vanilla project for what
we're doing. It's a smaller scale. There's
basically only infill parcels left in the urban
area. You're not going to see too many big
projects coming through anymore within the urban
area. There may be further east, the bigger
projects, but you're going to have these -- you'll
probably see a bunch of smaller, 10 acre, 15 acre,
20-acre parcels going through, not by you, but just
throughout Collier County at this point.
That's an overview of what we're proposing to
do. I can answer any questions you may have, and I
know this gentleman is sort of ready.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. Who are you
sharing the entryway with, the GL Homes project?
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. This is -- I believe
this, Cullen Walker (phonetic) runs this piece
9
right here and GL is a little bit further to the
west. The corner piece is Livingston -- no, it's
not. It's Logan. Logan and Immokalee is what GL
Homes (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is that where that
driveway is now, kind of?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. If you look, it's hard
to see on this aerial, but there's a little
driveway right here right now that's kind of
between the two pieces. That's technically on our
piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: But, yeah, this is the
Falling Waters piece right here, and I believe this
is GL right here.
Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the
dimensions between Saturnia Boulevard that goes
into our project and (indiscernible)?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, here's what I know.
We've got a bunch of dimensions here.
The house -- there are -- we measured from
several houses, because I know I can't tell you
(indiscernible), but I can tell you from this
house, which is the closest house, it's 297 feet
10
from the -- I think that's the pool cage to our
property. So it's, basically, 300 feet before you
get to our property.
And then it's a little bit further back. This
house right here is 316 feet. This house right
here is 323 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But I'm more
concerned about our drive in. We're going to be
(indiscernible) your houses --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Over here?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. When we're
driving in our boulevard, we'll be seeing all this
(indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: When you're driving in, can
you see anybody (indiscernible)?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We're right there.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't have that distance.
Sharon, do you know that distance?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It looks like it's
only 5, 10 feet.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Oh, it's more than that. I
can promise you it's more than that.
And that's where, if you look on this here
(indiscernible) we have the vegetation
(indiscernible) boulevard. So (indiscernible).
11
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The distance from
the house you just pointed out to the closest part
of your development will be close to 300 feet.
What about elevation?
In other words, if you build something that's
max 50 feet tall, will the homes on that street see
that? Is that part of their view? Because right
now, their view includes a lake and a beautifully
landscaped hillside.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. To be honest with you,
I'm sure you will see part of that building.
There's no way you're not going to see part of that
building, but you're not going to have a big
building just staring at you, because we're
required to have a landscape buffer.
You guys (indiscernible) here on your side,
too, but I can't imagine that, at some point, when
you're driving on that or looking out some part of
your yard, that you're not going to get a glimpse
of this building.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But you need to
understand that the people that live along that
street, they paid a premium price to be on the lake
with a landscaped view. Now you're going to
destroy that.
12
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, and I appreciate that,
but at the same time, and don't -- don't -- I don't
know how to be anything but direct -- this piece of
property is asking for what it's allowed to do
under the county's plan. And I'm sorry if someone
represented to you, and I wouldn't be surprised,
that maybe you'll never see anything next door to
you, but the reality is you're going to see
something here.
This property has rights, through the existing
comprehensive plan, to develop. We will provide
buffers, but I will not -- I can't represent to you
you're not going to see another building on this
piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So will the
homeowners along that street have an opportunity to
express their objections to the county?
MR. YOVANOVICH: You will have an opportunity,
of course. You can go to the Planning Commission
meeting and also the Board of County Commissioners
meeting.
Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What is the
maximum elevation that they can build at?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: 50 feet.
13
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: 50?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. What we're asking
for.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Tippy top, and I coined that
phrase because I didn't know any other way to
describe it, tippy top of the senior housing will
be 55 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. Do you know
how high it is for Sandalwood?
MR. YOVANOVICH: For Sandalwood, what did we
do? I think Sandalwood's taller. I think
that's over there.
Ray Bellows, by the way, he's with Collier
County. He is the planner responsible for this
project now as we go through the process. So if
you've got comments you want to make to the county,
Ray Bellows is your contact person to address
county comments. If you want to talk to us, it's
me and Wayne.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What is the
elevation of Sandalwood?
MR. ARNOLD: Sandalwood, I don't remember the
exact height, but that's a three-story building
over parking. So you've got three living levels.
14
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But what are we
talking about, what is the elevation? Are we
talking about we're going to get something that
height?
MR. ARNOLD: It's probably very similar to the
height we're asking for.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's going to be
three stories, you're talking about?
MR. ARNOLD: Well, we've asked for -- we
don't -- the county doesn't typically want you to
identify numbers of stories. They ask for the
height.
But just to point out, I mean, I know they
didn't build multifamily, but I worked on the Regus
(phonetic) PUD, which that's what Saturnia Lakes
was originally zoned as, and it made provisions for
50 feet zoned height in your community.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So if I'm sitting
here, I can see the top of that building. Is that
about what we would see?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Wait. I know exactly what
you're saying.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: So you're asking me if you're
the same (indiscernible) see that much of the
15
building?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Right. If I'm in
my backyard, and here's the landscaping and
everything, is it going to be that high or --
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know how tall your
landscaping is in your backyard, so I don't -- I
don't want to (indiscernible) your backyard, so I
don't know.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah, I
understand.
MR. YOVANOVICH: What we can do -- what we can
do is we can put together --
MR. ARNOLD: A buffer exhibit.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- a buffer exhibit that will
show you sightlines as if you were in your backyard
looking, because it all depends. You know, if
you're right close to your trees, you're going to
see nothing. You move a little bit further back,
you may see some of the roof.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Knowing that the
community that we live in now and all the
surrounding communities are basically single-family
dwellings and Sandalwood on Vanderbilt Beach Road
is the senior citizens, would you take into
consideration that our area is mainly single
16
family, so maybe that would fit in better with the
community surrounding, the houses that are across
on Logan?
MR. YOVANOVICH: What happens, from a
development standpoint, is, obviously, your
community -- I don't remember how many acres it
started out as, but it's obviously a master planned
community (indiscernible) on a much bigger scale
with the ability to put in all the necessary
infrastructure and water management, streets and
all of that.
MR. ARNOLD: 241 acres.
MR. YOVANOVICH: You can get --
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What was it
(indiscernible)?
MR. ARNOLD: 240 units -- 240 acres.
MR. YOVANOVICH: 240 acres. So you had a much
-- you had a bigger -- you had a bigger pallet, if
you will, to work from. When you get into these
smaller infill projects, just by their size,
they're going to result in multifamily-type
projects or senior housing-type projects, just
because of the size of the land, to make all of the
infrastructure work. It just can't -- it can't
work as a single family.
17
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, considering
that the dwellings where we are and the ones across
from Logan that -- I think it's some kind of woods
over there, people have single family --
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oakside.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oakside, yeah.
They have single-family homes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Would it be --
MR. YOVANOVICH: And that's why we'll address
it through our required landscape buffers, our
distances from your homes, being 300 feet away from
the nearest home. We'll take care of that
through -- through those -- the buffer requirements
that we're putting in place and the like is how
we'll address those issues.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How close to the --
your property borderline faces Saturnia, closest
houses, are you allowed, by zoning, to place the
house -- your --
MR. YOVANOVICH: What's our setback?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, what's your
setback?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Is that what you're saying?
18
Okay.
Do you know (indiscernible) Wayne?
MR. ARNOLD: No.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Give me two seconds.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: What have you got? Okay.
You don't have (indiscernible)?
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's probably
(indiscernible), right?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. ARNOLD: Probably. (Indiscernible) has 20
feet on that.
MR. YOVANOVICH: The closest we'd be to our
property line would be 20 foot (indiscernible) I
think (indiscernible) rear yard.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: It could be 20 feet from our
property line.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And there's a
requirement (indiscernible) alone (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would you
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Where is Immokalee
Road on there?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Immokalee Road is up here.
19
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's Immokalee
Road?
MR. YOVANOVICH: This is Immokalee Road here.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And that would be
the entrance?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That would be our entrance
right here. This would be our entrance. And your
entrance is over here.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible).
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible)
didn't have enough buffer (indiscernible). Maybe
put some tall trees or something like that to help,
you know, cut the view down.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would you be willing
to help Saturnia Lakes rebuild our buffer area
within our side? Would you do that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That's not an unusual request
that you're asking. So I will obviously take that
to my client to talk about that. We'll have to
coordinate it with your homeowners association,
obviously, to get the ability to come on that
property, plant it, and I'm assuming you all would,
if we planted, you would be willing to take over
20
and make sure (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I can't speak for
the community, but --
MR. YOVANOVICH: But, you know, those are the
types of things that are not usual for us to look
at.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Can you tell me the
distance from the bottom house on the south end to
the proposed --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Here?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, that house.
And also what's the -- I see that the preserve is
1.72 acres. Can you give me that in feet from
south to north with that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, I can.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: All right. Thank
you.
MR. YOVANOVICH: The width of the buffer?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: This is 165 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay, 165 feet.
Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And then this house, which I
think is -- this house is 60 feet from the property
21
edge, and that would be a total of 225.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: All right. Great.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Is that you?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: My in-laws, yes.
They are that house right there.
MR. YOVANOVICH: When you said stop, I figured
I (indiscernible).
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Just two questions.
I'm sorry if -- I didn't see the first
(indiscernible). The buffer will be at the
southern end of that piece of property?
MR. YOVANOVICH: The preserve --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- is going to be here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And how wide -- how
deep is that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That's 165 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. And the other
thing is, is there a time limit on when your client
is going to decide whether he'll go with individual
housing or multifamily housing? And maybe it's a
question for the gentleman from Collier County.
When would they have to tell you, make a decision
on what kind of housing it would be?
22
And then I have another question. What can we
do to influence it one way or another?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: If anything.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. I am the zoning manager
for Collier County. I've been with the county
about 29 years, and when PUD zoning projects come
in like this, there's generally a multitude of
dwelling types that the developer typically
requests. And that allows for them to address the
changing market conditions without having to come
back through a public hearing every time.
So, generally speaking, the market -- the
applicant's trying to respond to the market
conditions, and the request they're proposing is
multifamily?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, sir. Well, we also
asked for single family.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. So they allow for a mix
of single and multifamily. And what will happen is
staff will review those development standards, the
building heights, setbacks, the landscape buffers,
water management, the traffic impacts, and make
sure that they meet all county codes and
regulations.
23
We don't -- the county has no rules or
regulations that dictate what type of dwelling
units can be constructed in the area. That's a
market condition.
We typically listen and want encouragement of
the public, the surrounding communities, to get
their input, to see how we can work with the
applicant to reach any consensus where we can, and
maybe providing additional buffer or additional
setbacks or some other condition that could help.
Anyways, the final decision of whether a
project is approved or denied is by the Board of
County Commissioners. So, certainly, your input,
letters expressing concerns or support for a
project is greatly appreciated, because we can use
that to incorporate in our analysis and findings.
MR. ARNOLD: If I could just add to what Ray
said. Just in your own community, for instance,
when I was working with the GL Homes to obtain your
zoning from agricultural to PUD, we included all
the gamut of dwelling unit types, because I
remember doing iterations of site plans for them,
and we had pods that were going to be multifamily,
and some that were zero lot lines, some that were
going to be townhomes, and they ultimately made the
24
decision that this community was better suited to
be single family from their marketability
standpoint.
Part of that's when it comes to market and how
many units you have. And as Rich said, this is
very much an infill project. I mean, you have the
luxury of 241 acres to do some really large scale
master planning. And we're pretty confined with
the little, which we call it postage stamp site by
most standards.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to start here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'm sorry. I might
have missed this, but does this not require a
zoning change?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. And that's what we're
doing. We're going through the process. We're
currently zoned (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I mean, if I heard
it, I'm sorry.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I may not have
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible)
here.
MR. YOVANOVICH: They will be. We'll go to
the Planning Commission. We don't have any dates
25
set yet.
MR. ARNOLD: No.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And the building
you're talking about potentially could be the
equivalent of like a four-story building.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: That's the senior
(indiscernible).
MR. ARNOLD: Could be.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to say the senior
could be up to four stories. I don't think they're
going to be able to get five stories in a 45-foot
zone lot. So maybe four stories.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And how many units
will be in the four-story building?
MR. YOVANOVICH: If we did senior housing, we
could have up to 200 units, which, from a
transportation standpoint, believe it or not, is
less than the other alternative of multifamily.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Because they don't drive.
They really don't drive. When they move in, they
come in with their car, and then they
26
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would they be rental
units or --
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know. Don't know.
Sandalwood is. There's a big -- there's varying
needs out there. Not everybody is moving into
Moorings Park. There are -- and Sandalwood is at a
nice market for people to pay a nice -- it's not
cheap, but a nice monthly rental.
So it depends on, you know, who the senior
developer would be.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's a good thing
they're not driving if they had to pull out onto
Immokalee Road.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: The question was,
though, when, during the process, will that be
decided? On what type of --
MR. YOVANOVICH: We will -- we will make the
decision -- I'll be honest with you, the decision
will be made when the ultimate developer buys the
piece from us. So it will either be sold to --
this will be either sold to a multifamily
developer, a single-family developer or senior
27
housing. It will not be a combination of those
things. Someone will come in and pick from one of
those, basically, three options.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Anybody else in the back
before I come back to the front?
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Again, I think one
of the questions was when is this decision slated
to be?
MR. BELLOWS: Well, the staff reviews the
submittal when it first comes in. So our
transportation folks review it, landscape folks,
fire, water management, engineering. They all
review it to make sure it meets county codes.
For water management, so it doesn't have storm
water running off into adjoining developments.
Transportation will make sure that there's not
going to be a capacity problem or an access issue.
They'll look at whether signalization is warranted.
All those comments go into -- the lead planner
in this case will probably be me. I'm taking over
for someone who is ill, and we'll generate a report
outlining how it's consistent with the Collier
County Comprehensive Plan.
28
Density is one of those things that we'll
compare. Our comprehensive plan limits density in
certain areas. And you can get more density by
qualifying for some processes such as affordable
housing. They're not doing that in this case.
They're not proposing an affordable housing project
with density bonuses.
MR. YOVANOVICH: No.
MR. BELLOWS: But what is going on is staff is
trying to make sure what is being proposed is
consistent with our codes and regulations,
including water management district permits that
are required.
But the first step in the process is the
zoning step. The next step -- and you're -- the
board would be looking at an option, single-family
option or multifamily option. It's still going to
be an administrative process after the board
approves the zoning. It's an administrative
process after that. If they come in for single
family, it will be a platting process, which is
done administratively.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: The board
(indiscernible) the board can hear this?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes.
29
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. After all the reviews are
done, and depending on if the applicant --
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. BELLOWS: Some of it is --
MR. YOVANOVICH: We probably (indiscernible)
catch up, because you're new, you know, where we
are.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: But my guess is we're not
going to be in front of the Board of County
Commissioners until Octoberish at the earliest.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, late fall.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And will our
community be notified in that period?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Absolutely. You will get --
if you got a letter for this --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- you'll get a letter for
that. Your association will get a letter. I'm
assuming you guys can do e-mail blasts. There will
be signs on the property, out on the street, that
will say when the hearing is.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That no one can
read.
30
MR. YOVANOVICH: There will be an ad in the
newspaper --
MR. BELLOWS: But at least you know to call
the county and we can fill you in on the details.
MR. YOVANOVICH: My guess is we're probably
talking in October, if everything goes smoothly
from this point forward.
MR. ARNOLD: I'd like to jump in, too. Since
we don't have hearing dates set, Sharon, who is
recording the meeting for us tonight, she's also
our lead planning technician at the office, we'll
set up a link on our -- on the county's website,
right, or our website?
MS. UMPENHOUR: Our website through the
county.
MR. ARNOLD: We'll set up a link that -- to
keep you up to date at least with the current
submittal information that's there and then the
county provides notices of the public hearing. So
they will notify, I'm pretty sure, your
association.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And your association, I know,
was very good. When we had to cancel the first
meeting, they sent out an e-mail blast and were
31
very good about assisting us to get the notice out
to you all.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the chance
of all this construction happening at the same time
with this project and then the GL Homes one for the
shopping center? Could it possibly all impact all
at one time?
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know where they are
in the process.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: In the timeline?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Wayne, are you working on
that project?
MR. ARNOLD: I'm not working on that project.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm not working on that one,
so I don't know where they are in the process.
MR. ARNOLD: I think they recently held a
neighborhood meeting, didn't they?
MR. YOVANOVICH: They had a neighborhood
information meeting?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. I think they
said 2018, but, you know --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, they're a little bit ahead
of us, but they're also having to amend the
32
comprehensive plan to convert that corner to
commercial, so.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, ma'am, and then you,
sir.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I'm really
concerned, because it's my understanding that, from
here down to Ave Maria, they are building about 11
different complexes without infrastructure going
across. How can the county approve all of these
developments going on? This Immokalee Road will be
like 75, only we have three highways instead of
four. I don't understand why.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, and Jim Banks can get
into the greater detail, but the county has what's
called concurrency management. There is a
requirement that each project, when it comes
basically in for either its site development plan
or its plat, there's another transportation study
done at that time to make sure that the capacity
that the road has is still available for that
project to go forward.
If there's not, just because we get the zoning
doesn't guarantee you're ultimately going to get it
built.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: They are taking
33
their sweet time doing roads going up across.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And I understand that, but
from the analysis that's been done and the review
that's been done, there is adequate capacity for
our proposed project and the number of trips that
are going to go through, because the county does
have the concurrency management system. If you
don't have water, if you don't have sewer, if you
don't have roads, you don't get to build.
So we're going to go through another analysis
when either the plat or the sight plan goes through
to make sure that what's there today is there in
the future when we are going to be building.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Can you talk a
little bit about the traffic pattern?
Particularly, it appears you're going to be
shooting traffic through the shopping mall that's
going to come out on Logan or then they're going
make a (indiscernible) go up and make a U-turn
(indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, we're actually here.
We're actually right here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You're not next to
the shopping mall?
34
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. This is Mr. Walker's
property. I don't know what title he owns it
under, but this is another piece. This is not us.
And this is the shopping center.
In a perfect world, and this is what the
county likes to see happen, is you can see on our
master plan they're going to require us to
interconnect. If I'm, again, a betting man,
they're going to want this project to connect to
the shopping center so people who are in our
community will not have to get out onto Immokalee
Road to find their way to the shopping center,
either getting there or coming back.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Especially if
they're assisted living.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yeah. They'll either walk or
they'll drive (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: In golf carts.
MR. YOVANOVICH: (Indiscernible) driving golf
carts. But there will be -- hopefully, there will
be an interconnection to do what should happen,
which is to keep people off the main roads.
Whether this property owner is going to want
that to happen or not, I don't know, I can't speak
for them. But, ultimately, the county's desire is
35
to have kind of these (indiscernible) frontage
roads to allow people to go back and forth without
getting onto Immokalee Road or --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How big is the space
between your property and the shopping mall? Is it
the same --
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, it's about a 10-acre tract.
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's about the same width.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Same width?
MR. ARNOLD: It's about a 10-acre tract. It's
about 330 feet wide.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, in essence, they
could come in there and build another 200 units for
senior housing or whatever, whoever.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. Or they could --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So we could have a
major explosion of people in this narrow area here.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I would -- again --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I mean, there's no
other use for that property, right?
MR. YOVANOVICH: There's not. I mean, it's
either -- it's going to be some form of
residential.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's got to be
36
residential property.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Most of us in here are
getting a little older. So, at some point, we're
going to move into some of those senior housing
places, some of us sooner than later, but there's,
you know, there's definitely -- I can't tell you
how many senior housing projects we've taken
through the process in the last few years to meet
public demand.
Now, it will probably slow for a while because
there have been a few built, but it's in big
demand.
Anybody -- anybody else?
So just to recap where we'll go next. We'll
be going to the Planning Commission probably
sometime late summer?
MR. ARNOLD: Yep.
MR. YOVANOVICH: You'll get notice of that.
There will be signs on the property. There will be
ads in the paper.
And then we'll go to the Board of County
Commissioners, probably latter part of -- I would
guess Octoberish we'll get in front of them.
Again, it's a public hearing process.
The commissioners want to hear from you.
37
Staff wants to hear from you. And we want to hear
from you.
The suggestions about providing some
additional landscaping on your side is a reasonable
request, and we'll talk to our client about that.
There are ways to address concerns you may have
with buffers and breaking up what you might -- may
or may not see from (indiscernible).
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are you at liberty
to say who your client is?
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's the Clearys. The
Clearys own it, but they don't -- they own the
property, but they're not developers. So I don't
know who the ultimate builder may or not be
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the zoning
automatically -- whatever you're zoned for in your
piece of property, will that automatically carry
over to the Walker's property?
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. They'll have to go
through the very same process we are going through,
to talk to you all about what they want to do with
their property and when they're ready to develop.
Just because we get approved doesn't guarantee them
38
anything.
Their property is a little bit different. We
have to (indiscernible) preserve. They will
probably (indiscernible) living on this cul-de-sac,
I guess there's some (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So, currently --
MR. YOVANOVICH: But we have no impact on our
neighbor.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So, currently,
both properties are zoned for single family?
MR. ARNOLD: Agriculture.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right now, they're zoned
agricultural, which, in the urban area, basically,
is okay for future development.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I just don't
understand where everybody fits in and where we
are. Your clients are the property owners now?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And then the
property owners will probably sell to a developer
once the property is cleared for building?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Once we get the zoning
approved, it typically works that way.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Especially on smaller
39
parcels.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Bigger parcels, like GL
Homes, put it through the process themselves.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. Like they
did for the shopping center.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. Yes. So usually
that -- for small pieces like that, in order for it
to move forward, they like to --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, basically,
you're in the process of preparing that and,
legally, for a developer to buy it and develop it?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. And whoever --
whoever develops the property will have to live
with all of the commitments we made in the PUD. So
it's not just this group. It's whoever develops
it.
That's where you'll find your safeguards and
make sure that you're getting (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is your client
bidding on that piece of property between the one
you're describing and the shopping mall?
MR. YOVANOVICH: This right here?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: No.
40
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: They're not bidding
on it.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It's not for sale.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's not for sale.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The nursery owns
it.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) for
sale.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: I used to believe that, too,
but I'm not sure this is for sale.
MR. ARNOLD: That property that, Rich, is next
to our property, is owned by the Cullen Walkers.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: -- the landscaper, who owns that
parcel.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: I don't know -- Cullen owns
pieces of property all over Collier County.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, it's a useless
piece of property, and particularly when he passes
away, you know, his heirs are not going to want to
sit there with a useless piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's
probably long off.
41
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It could be.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: Any other questions,
comments? Yes, sir.
MR. NADEL: I'd just like to offer an
informational comment. I'm your neighbor, Dick
Nadel (phonetic) for Saturnia. I'm the commercial
realtor who has been representing the Cleary family
for the last couple of years on this property. I
also sold the big piece of property to GL Homes.
Just so you know, that property could have
gone a number of different directions. As a PUD,
it was eligible to be a school, a church. I've
been contacted by people who had a mosque, okay,
Ractrac, gas stations. And the highest and best
use for this property, to me, would be a high-end,
you know, type of development that they're talking
about here.
You know, the owners of a property have a
right to sell, of course. And you just want, you
know -- we, as homeowners in Saturnia, want to make
sure that it's, you know, it's going to be
compatible with what we're doing.
Something on -- it's upscale like Sandalwood
or something similar to that would make a lot of
42
sense, more than a lot of the other possibilities,
and I've seen them in the last two or three years.
So I think they're doing the right thing. It
will be the best for the folks. It could be a lot
worse, I guarantee.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: 200 units on here
seems like an awfully high density to say this is
high-end property.
MR. YOVANOVICH: That would be the max.
Everybody -- all the potential buyers don't need
that much. Some need 150, 160, 180. So you don't
know. You don't know until somebody actually puts
a contract on it.
MR. ARNOLD: And if I might just add to that.
You don't really know until one of the senior
housing providers comes along. Some do memory care
and have many smaller units than you would
typically find if you were just, you know, Moorings
Park, where you're selling a very much luxury
lifestyle of several thousand square foot units.
So until we know what that mix is, you just don't
know.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But I think, in this
area, you want it to be high end. This is a
high-end area around here, and you don't want to be
43
overly dense. And, you know, keep the real estate
values.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Those are the kind
of people that we've been talking to, by the way,
higher end. It makes a lot of sense.
MR. ARNOLD: And these places are, you know,
one, they have to provide dining facilities.
They've got to provide a wellness center. They're
highly amenitized places.
So they are high end. It's not -- it's not
just -- I mean, 200 units sounds like a lot of
units, but it's usually one or two people in those
units. A lot of times, there's just one person in
those units, but they have high -- they have lots
of amenities within that facility, because -- and
they have transportation that takes them to and
from where they want to go.
So it's a community that they're very close
knit, companionship, they're not going, traveling
about a lot. They've got what they need right
there for themselves. And it is going to be a
high-end community.
I don't -- I think Sandalwood is somewhere
around $4,000 a month.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Close to it, yes.
44
MR. ARNOLD: Okay. I mean, that's not
inexpensive.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But just, as an
example, what size are the Sandalwood units square
footage-wise?
MR. ARNOLD: You know, I was afraid you were
going to ask me that. I don't know. I do know
that --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are they like two
bedroom, one bedroom?
MR. ARNOLD: Some are.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Most of them are -- they are
two bedrooms. They have some two bedrooms. A lot
of them are one bedrooms, because they are single
people.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: There are studios
also, just to (indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: There may be some studios,
but I think most of them are, you know, a ONE
bedroom with a living room. And a lot of them have
the cooking facilities, but then --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: But they like to know they
can if they want to. It's a nice little apartment
for people that don't want to have their own condo
45
or house.
Any other questions or comments?
All right. Well, I thank you and I thank you
for coming, and have a good evening.
MR. ARNOLD: Thank you all.
(Recording concluded.)
46
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that:
1. The foregoing transcript contains a full,
true and correct transcript of proceedings in the
above-entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of
my knowledge and ability from a digital audio recording.
2. I am not counsel for, related to, or
employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled
cause.
3. I am not financially or otherwise
interested in the outcome of this case.
DATED: May 7, 2017
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED:
________________________
Joyce B. Howell
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUF1 Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group(igusing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes. Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
_ Sincerely,
nature) /�
�zy2a �/fax
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �j� f✓r�t9�����
Letter to
BG of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Sat a Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: _��
De
N ylps iFt 3y/1
V nate 0/it / a&/ }
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
_ l-7
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an insthutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition. the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION
Sincerely,
�ure)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /vl L)/JR/,D .Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:t't - & 1��C 77
��%5
)P=L '-svr( tp
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
i
r
C'`�l l I %�l7j'h:r/ � A
r
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 3 tt �Q�OVLWk" � c A Date: U 1
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: rX 334 �u.'GT�' � W h1 Wt W M
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL2016000198.5,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL2016000IN5,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Irmiokalee Ro
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for sen
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in tl
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Pok*
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing i
is more similar to an insidutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearty
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
4 010 1 W ME M Van - -
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address_
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely.
i (signature)
`
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print). J AKt. sy e—o— I (Date: C��C ( 7
Y
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: ID� S .S�1 H1•c i / �A eLvi,PL 34111
Scanned by CamScanner
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45.50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal- The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):/�/�n�7E{G� r /� Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: _2_.3 yZ- gtc r' � l fy K[11rt -s`. 13;;1111 1.
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Darren Sherwood Date: 8-9-17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2016 Painted Palm Drive, Naples, FL 34119
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the properly owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property Is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons,
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a coned height of 45.50 feel for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building heighl of 45.50 foot is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicanl(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4
regldres new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an Institutionalicommorciai type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal' The proposed use of the properly should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Salumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): C'44 ° o S A04rGt o Date'
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: y80S S,rvfFge '9.17-r ��. /t/4 ozr5 X't
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feel for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
i
J�:gnature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): A fi/n (JaklL'iy(Jnl // Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 053 �b-lQ C/P lagjm4
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sir cm*,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):: f!C/tARJ�/� �////lf�' !//7 A% A -?c////
Dater
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: .23/y-71& F�!/ 9, As M/"/ -J A/ �/ 5
Letter to
Hoard of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the propose) for rezone PUDZ-PL20150001ga5.
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of ImMkalee Road and Salumia
Lakes BIW The proposed use of the property is for residential antl r or group housing for sensors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
I - The applicanils) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing. the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area Future Land Use Element (FLUE) POficy 5,4 requires new
projects to be oOmpallble with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
Proposed group housing building height of 45.50 feel is significantly larger Or higher than the Immediately
adja0ent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We ate asking the Board of County
Commissioners not b rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 - The applicantlsj have requested a rezone for group housing Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an mstitutionapcomit ercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Salumia Lakes residential development In addilton, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner properly values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumle Lakes Homeowner Pro osel: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development Only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION
Sincerely,
4; (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (Please print): � w L /- � �CC�pate: ;�
Salumia Lakes Homeowner address: J2 C y ��/.�--7 SID ✓/�C{ Jy Z�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal, The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
gnature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print)
?06jfli�t/) Data:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(sig
..:-ia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): I�
-:urnia Lakes Homeowner address: ���riL �AIMei� ►c
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL2D160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons -
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Pr000sal- The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
/ / signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): �� `� �`%x� Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z z�/ G'�� qr e l ��+ e v1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /— 04441 rV9 60,091Ye1Date: b - 9 a / 7
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: <;tV ozF / 1,ti /141,w, ,&, & Jv� 9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 96,5 14F065,—AJ> Date: 6-10-17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: HYD K,.Jl, S.aG 6 r7—
/�/QPGLSS C 3y��9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
?-t,6
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
*Ltffig
nature) o
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): -D/ -i,/'. 'i') C2 EXit Date: a ��
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: Z9 42 rsZ'* 2) PH L/0&
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 – The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 – The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Since%�—
rel(s a ure)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): iJ I LL I A M � U krJ ETT Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
P�¢SI FL 34119
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 – The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 – The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
P-1--1J%—>t�1gnature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): -� oSEP N lbYK S�A Date: U C )) /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z 4 � 2 %3v
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
/11 &- /0 -)-ol'7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): �n2a T' Lo'2 C"oi2AN Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: ,2 44Z / w FGr7 JQC' l am .
Mr. & Mrs. Robert C. Carlsen
2350 Butterfly Palm Drive
Naples, FL 34119
August 9, 2017
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We are property owners of Saturnia Lakes and we oppose and object to the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the
vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for
residential and/or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of County Commissioners to
deny the rezone for the following reasons:
The applicants have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar
to residential properties in the community.
2. The applicants have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element
(FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to
surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the
proposed 200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to
Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake homeowner property values.
Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to
a residential development only.
T C. CARLSEN
�" r1LA WIN.
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
is Lakes Homeowner Name (please �j
print)): S(J-, V OSI Date: / � 7^
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: JS (o > 1.0 r H J A A4 -e , � IM. -e 3(-/� � 'If
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /� / .�7 L- Sods Z Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: l Ci / C1gA/,4J(4 1 S/Ar �� �� of
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Q A /�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
�gnature)
i N
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): —� e� t / 1 U� fYO I �1 Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �0 TV b fL4 ('Ay) t-- i
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
A"�a r 1 I
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ACIVA
R. f� . F "
Wei- D" Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: IqQ4 rjy%e"s Sd,,aj IOtI� 1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): R M k U M R Date:
0� Ic9/201 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 3 $ 7 (3 U 7 T L R PLY P(-) LM Pkv
Iv APcES FL_ 301`/
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing. the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses Group Housing use
is more similar to an institulionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): � "a^� 'r % d1C,,l ole / ��pJ nit �D/ Date: � �—� �
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �QI-�'s`-// 06-AM4 CIK AWCS FL 3Y/19
Lefler to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
q) (sig ure)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Rn �J2 �A/R 8R n 1 1iFR Date: 9 %7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1453 -rJZ.4A1.L1- ?AL M'kZ9h-e,&
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):�%u ( (gyp c� KS �Date: 6 —k
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: In 14—C�aiNG 1�c1 M� iVAP l FCS 4 l\`�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Salumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
4` ignature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please p/riint)(0/� �� i / �✓l ` Date: 9 /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2-Y e4f/!? J SAO L✓1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001965,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the Immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): CA /%7///f Date: 01
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: /-J,-33 L/zdL
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons -
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments In the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumla Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(si ture)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
_ )JU e
! f , r 6 I 1
Date: P -C7 '
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: - a 3 `/
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd The proposed use of the property is for residential and/or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing. the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): .iTi9.rrrs �— ZF P/' Date: Cr'—&/. 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: -2q 3 4 124c- r t 1012— 79cf ! 17
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We. the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001965,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 6,-, im,, DateA 4cz-';1�y -2e17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: / 3f �r �A ✓W �O�/�
Letter to
Board of Colyer County Commissioners
he the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ.PL20160001985
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development IRPUDI located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for sensors We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
I - The applicant(sl have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feel for group housing the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet Is significantly larger or higher than the Immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 - The apphcantls) have requested a rezone for group housing Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses Group Housing use
is more similar to an instllutlonallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values Please maintain the value of our communities'
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION
Sincerely.
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print) 1 `�n7nM n 5 r 1l f11 c I\ E_. DaM:Z
Satumla Lakes Homeowner address. d 3 `� 2 Lief C" 1 U 1- l q .
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Linda Ggggpr
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Linda Gardner Dater/8/1 "
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1376 Areca Cove
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezona for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and compl=_menlary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of and use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential developmeAt. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia hakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Lakes Homeowner Name (pi
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
ease print):AF Date:
�r� Cr. a 3f/f�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20180001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes BIW. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be Immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities]
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnie Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):Q%uTDate: 56 106 L701l
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Q410 Lt*�S1,tM. NwglK r Cti 3411%
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residenfial Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
i (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): �// �� // //��//974, ��%%1 4 Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: � Z!-7 (7r!A4 -f=(V /-4(e? Y7 e
Letb(to
Board of Collor County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Salumla Lakes oppose end olbect the proposal for mzane PUDZ-PL2010000IM5,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Imm skelee Road and Saumia
Lakes RNd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors. W e urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the ozone for the following masons.
I —The appficanIla) have requested a zoned height of 4550 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other bunk ings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE)Policy 5.4 requires new
projects he be compabblewlth and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the imniediaely
adjecent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
CornMssioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the densly and the height of buildings In the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Pulley 5.4
requires, new projects lobe compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more s!mAerto an Inatltutlonal/commercial type of land use than a realdenlal land use which Is dearly
incompatible with the Suumia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be Immediately adjacent lo Satumla Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Pease maintain the value of our cornmunifies!
Saturnia Lakes HomeownerPr000szl: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
developmenlonly.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
�Sincerely. n /
SaWnria Lakes Homeowner Name (pease printy.
� )dined
Po I,fnn 2!Y
Dote: '3 t 1201 7
Satumla Lakes Homeowneraddress: Q0S&
foa/nfea
Y's, lr)I
i
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Cx�
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Carissa Johnson Dale: 8/9/17
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: 1328 Tflarldra Ln, Naples, FI 34119
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feel for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residenlial developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values Please maintain the value of our communities'
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION
Sincerely,
signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print). 1_. `t�57 1C�J1 Pi (J,.��- Dale r`l -'1 -
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address. ' 7J� T�i c.c�&(-G LQll o-
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal, The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): kl 12 l Li r12
(111 Iry Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: / 43( rel iv 5 \ -,® (-'-Z
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 1; Y 9 C.K Dater/ /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: fob %g A &,!i;o ,4
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
A�L� Signa re)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): V-gco nN—A�� Date: $IiCI l�
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
( PL, `-YMC�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):/
7( Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 3 �e.,r �'zY ✓N+A
3P'
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature) / /�y
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): rr1--14' /L/ Czz S Date: O ��
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: av�� AIW7 -2
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and f or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
QSincerely,
(signature)
/P//cvO��
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): !, /9#4 0 /J A6a11 N,-,pDater
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1-2prio' /3 dQ d /i I CON ig e�
N)gPLEs
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Satum4aLak/s Homeowner Name (please prriint)/ O.if�%>< /w� o �e Date: p
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: re ,+11 J //
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
Incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
(�/jSSii/nrcerely,
'T^ ignature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ���QE� �-/ �F r Date: 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: A<24o? e'IA .AF '�fi'�JYJfj' de/QLt%
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
�
Sincerely,
i nature) �/
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print) -J/ Zwm ' `"
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Iff
ate:
A?
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
Incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
�'A 1172� (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Dh v' ck
16/ i�
in
Date: O // %
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z LIO S
}J T C j/
I c j^
�.
./✓co )c S EL TY/IL
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): i7{� (�lJ ��d Dater
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
7ekr
IMAM -es, JFL 5gllf
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20150001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
ILE
r
p�lupe)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please printtj): RQj} E (; � h-5rAFSQW Date: -31-
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1 r/O97 Tp Ad GLG �A1.M rC1�ACZ
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suits 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely, C� n /�M Z-&"
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
102
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
n (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): c. l (i;I ��44kl 0 <<M Date: 2't
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:�—
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):1'-' 0 1 k' Date: �� 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: /'x ���� �%� `5 VC--,
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
NaPk-5, F - 3L -I wl
l7
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20180001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokales Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing fur seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the Immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiest
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(mature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print). "QIwen lvUISC-
Date: -3G �-7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2i� 6 1 s la VQ (
VY)a C1 r
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): b IGJ L7 fAMd /J-Zt Date:gko I nL
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: J ,7 TI n n tr ( Q is D C O (v, r L 3 W 1 11
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 –The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
?—(Signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): �en�11 JOIILS Date: 09-50 -17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1813 ! P/4 eRc, Q�r�c -or NCI") &S_ FL -?V /I9
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumla Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely, �y
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): CYNf l S 4
k twt TidirOL-)
Date: 3 I ,29 / %
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: / `ir'r SS (a —tic
-PAt/`+2 a
(e
,, /✓-p les �L
Letter to
BG of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
S a Lakes dmeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 7 3
Qf-?-,-17
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
444 (signature',
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): —vaAll -D WOWAR,D Date: r7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1337 Ti?igNPAA 4-A/., /j/�jPLEl ACL 3 yii9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 4550 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional1commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
r
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
G' eCC' r" -:i 9' 4 P e j r Date: �S I Z cl I i %
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: GLL L 7b
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings In the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
9,0d- ft-il,SwA
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
2
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicants) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is Beady
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely, Zg6nare)
U I J
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 8 JMRAJ A &G Ht S Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: oCU3 t LSita 4 e Palms el", ' Pj 3YI11
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
L 4 ature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ,l C 'M�r A \AJ .'� ^G)aDaate:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 'Zn Z �AQ ea" ;
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Ct� r "I%—t t na ure
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 1 11 R [' I / T`(� �L Date: 1 I J 1 I
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings In the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be Immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
re)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ST=..,�� Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: %CSZL.iL',
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerel
=zl-
-(signature)
Saturnia lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Date: Date:
7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: u 0 �U i T I P'r, V'_
/V2r2l , R A/ 19
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Salumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001085,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and f or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicants) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an Institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): v l Date: 1
Setumla Lakes Homeowner address: (/ 1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone forthe following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
% QAR— (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print). K'W�-X_tA [V�ILOLIX� !' Date: 11` 14 `11
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: tSlJv �.1'Ybi1f� CT . ItXIt*4P . I"1. 3�f I I CI
4
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
- taiynature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name ase print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values Please maintain the value of our communities'
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
'il/wm. (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please
��print):tV/ '�_�-I�`CC.( (V�ILu(�,Xt.�.,,'-,, Date: `IL111,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: OV a� ►�ITb�ia C1 .. IWJJfC 4 FL 34 ll9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors- We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
VrLU 'J" -A A�'
nn, IM,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):A n4 Ce u c S " ` o i 5f -I 1 V D te: I U.? - 2 U 17
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: �52� ti,e' G n4 1, dl -1 & .:tr 0 / /�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
% (signature) p
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): t47; CC , £ Mi4^�(r/fi ✓/i/Lc� Date: 0 " 7 / 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 7,7 0J✓���L�� ��
Letter to
Board, of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lake meowner Name (please print): [!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
I • The app¢amis� nave equeslad a zoned nelg`,l M 45-W feet for group rousting, the proposed height
exceeds that cd at' ether buildings In the area Future Lail Use E ement IFLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
p: p}ecls I beinn. oatbte wil , and complementary to s.rrcundr: y :and uses. The proposed atensdy and
proposed group hcus,ng til. >ding height of 4_-5C feet s significartty arae, or Nglur, than the Imme@ately
adjacent Satuvea Lakes and wher tesn._ntial devesapmerts .n I" area. We are asicung me Board cin Corafry
Cummiswoners not to rezone to tra proposed RFUD and to keep the densly and the height of buidings in the
neighbomcorl sitN!ar to residential properllea to the c_mriunity.
2 - The appicantIM -ave requested a rezone for oroup housing. Future Lana Use Eleme-1 (FLUE) Policy 5 a
requires new proyecla k be compatible mN and complementary to m arrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is mem s-mitar to an rsututinr efrcom.Roeraai type at lard use than a residanhal IaM use wtxh is clearly
Iccornoebble wrm the Satumla Lakes residential development_ in addition, the prcposed 200 units of droup
housing proposed will be immedratety adjacent to Salurnra Laces which would tAety impact Saurnia Lake
homeowner property values Please maintain the value at our communities'
Tne proposed use of the prcperry should be limited to a resdentia.
deve,opmeru any
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION
E ncerely
.� � vi GZ,gruaNre'!
Saturnia Laces Homeowner Name (please pind),C'`+ �D ale
Saturnia Les Homeowner address: address:✓✓ ��'�'�D2� L�
ac
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is Beady
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
&iiWauffo y .(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): IJ "AAA AWL -re -EN Date: g 31 aOJ7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: I yLs ?X;NC£SS SRBAL YOiX%B rG. 3#11 �
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Salumis Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be Immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): n 1(,6 L 7a.Lrn a de, Date: _
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): c;G C' � f �11 (i Date: 3 I /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: I b S �:> SL NL (r A 1- -WLDZ .
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia takes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicants) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
w f.
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print)! AJ&f) tQ tJ S, M It n 1 r✓1 Date:
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: IS -19 Tr" i rA x-, A y-cL LLcz r -,e- _, r4o p le s
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20180001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print(: 11 I I
Q-1C1'✓YlcVh
Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 15 al k ecl
Ta' M -D✓
N(100-'
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): V ��� �M AV,\ Date:
Lakes Homeowner address:i�yLCC-�-
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
1 aturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): — " k,,eDa,e. V-20-117
«8� e, y
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: i
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL201600019B5,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments In the area, We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
r
Satumia Lakes Hortleowner Name (please print): &-QLrwe k?- �.% i1 t Date: aftfdt -
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 L G sM 2 T2rrc c.e- 1J�a-�.o 3�f 114
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We. the property, owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985.
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Salumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly, larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more simllar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition. the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be Immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely.
_(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Qn. u _Date. 2�1(
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: G21 7 /" /J ....4LS�r'C-T2.fY2-c.CG A�ltCt['J 391 (q
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons -
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia takes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an insfitutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
�\ (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please
/print):(_ 1 el( -
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 – The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 –The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
r
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please
^^print): (;, C r1/'o /0 e-C"i g14 _(� I Date:
C—,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �L� ZJ a uLiU. � � t-� � 'L � r I
Noe kes LV �'j
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
1 L (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
CEJC
G!
Date: Y-
" ' C1 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �J f)
T`1 '
(r ,O Pj
T -\YY-)
t
1 G L
o{ {
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects—lobe compatible with and complementary to surroun id nga d uses -We proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
6A0signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 41011�� �`,�`'"""�/alt, Date: 3 C)p
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �� 0 T JI
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001965,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit DevelopmePUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the prope is'for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny, a rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
�� ✓.- w �- (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): r, 4 ?u" Date: b z
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z 3 4 ; 3v 7 r Cley %H�r i �iL. /JAPe Esq F� 311112
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
V,It
;
I
f"Mi
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985.
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 4550 feet for group housing the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
;5roje-ets-to b-e-c-offipabble w-dh a—n complemer ti ary fo surrounding an uses. a proposed dens[ty and
proposed group housing building height of 4550 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia takes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. in addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projeCta tome coMpatibie with awn complementary to surrounding tam uses -.-Me proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
ig ature)
G�
I —t 'I I
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): c 1 am t f. I Q Sn t r Date: D
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �� 5enu 4 n � pic2/ e- �%/ i V L
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property Is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 4550 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects io b€Wmpetitile with and ciunplementary fo surrounding land usesk a proposed 3density and
proposed group housing building height of 4550 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): >^� �� �c Date:
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: /r w'O't an 4)'11 . 104/4cl JYll
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects tb CortiSjsatible with and corplemen ryto-surrooun inglaarn use--s-.Ta posed aensify and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): / 7 M� ate: 'Op.' -3e) i
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: -/-)Pf-ye ��
5(.
Letter to
Board of Collier Countv Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985.
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
l`` `(signaTurel
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please pnnt):a,4,Q01_,/,J/ Iv JL( (,I /WS Date) U -2 C -/
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: Q 13 a 1.5LA JE �4L l))A C / K l n L
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Scott Mitchell Date: 8/30/2017
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1964 Isla de Palma, Naples FL 34119
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 3/U1Ntbki ForNbwo Date: e j di "/ 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 21 Y 6 !i(A PC Ai,* vt Gr
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): r + S ''C'e' \ Date: �w
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1965-
% 65- 4-� '6Q- *1't7R ��/`
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
ignature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address_
7
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Siid
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons,
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): O I - I S Date: 6 � I
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: a� 'S N ��'+ Ir
le -i FL
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):�,�L) VBate: O 1
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: J r->. 3 r` SCG ,`J/' per �Ll"W— C:', V C— (E
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We. the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL2ot600ot9•t5,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
I — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in t ie
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community -
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy °A
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing u �e
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition. the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely.
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): (e('ri r��,2L , i /ST��pate:
7
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: f �v4 �r\� A I/2� 0 _
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property Is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings In the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45.50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the Immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments In the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values- Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): r l 51tall 7,2 u i� z,� Date: c�
Satumla Lakes Homeowner address: .2te'7G / saa 1
11yrae, 7 g
Scanned by CamScanner
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
C Z- "6d(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): C. Lane Wood Date: 8-29-17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2410 Butterfly Palm Drive, Naples, FL 34119
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community -
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
v/ (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 9r,'&N �G) d lL Date:_
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
N V4�'S, FL 3�/li
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumla
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The appllcanl(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings In the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing (wilding height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumla Lakes which would likely Impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitlesl
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
C.'
b'I (sign lure)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 9"W.50/7 6�u4 ha! Date: IT 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z4t 7 loci / i -A BAA' 4 e-'
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 – The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 – The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnla Lakes Homeowner Proposal, The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please Lprint): A?/ '^ "b C GZ I "- Date: &
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: / 2A,— /9 Del 1•
We, oa -I Satumra LAkeS CCWse >••-0c: e=: me procIcea or rezone PUDZ-P�20160001995
C,earY Res.den!Ial han--? Jnr' l?. -4,40 ten! IRPUD xalad Ine vKmrN of 4mm kA`ee Riad and Sa!u'a
Lakes 91vd Tra vcoosed Lasa -r fl+ pe_porty d to -er•xreai a,.: of grso -o "I.+ sank.•% We : 3e
me 9oard :t Count, C _ r 'o lenv the lc • tna !c+an'y'aascns
- The appWaMISnee4 fed.eiteIl a ZY+ d reynt ,;r as-oC feet for amup nuusmq. ma ptosed h#-01
e.caeds mat of a: c1ber m ma area FJIWe La" use Ev"Ill I FLUE' PWICy S I 'aaures'vw
p,00cm td he CDf^paat?e +,Rh ara CC^Iple' wry to sdlo•,' nt] NIM uses. Tre pmoosed Y_nvly rob
oropo sea grew n;..s+-3 :.-!Ong h I,?M Of as -SA feet Is sync ca^ey 4'r' or • r4her ban x Imnredafely
apacen! Salk, IZ Lakes arc d!nef resMenoal develOpinents .n are Afea 'Ne are as -N the 9oard of Counfy
Cannass.orlefs r+Ca tar rer_ne to xte pfeposad RPUD aro !s ,eep the densrty and I"+ "Pt cr :-ulbe`gs m the
nekyworfwdd Sl W fe resId !.al DICtkTes In Sne CMTt'fk.'1ii
2 - The appicarua ^aro feaxsw a wxe fc. 9ra.p N-ras ry F.maa :av use Element FLUE% Pdkcv S4
reipres new teonects fc oe :c'npa!Ib,e warm a . complemenary -o surr»nor.; lar uses G'-�p Hwsvy ww
IS fnore S,,n a to a^ ni:ayih' dl. .•nMCILaf type at IaM1 use than a resdenaal Nrtd use earn Is clearly
avcomoaade eFh me Savrna Lasri 'es centro save Wit l m addpuon *he ofWWd 200 .,Is of group
hou" prcposee unit be adjacent !o Sal, n,a Lakes wracn waad:rafY'wa.f Sawn Q Lake
Homeowner DrnV-^r 'al' P,_ a_e man!am We vaw o'.:.r cdnm.nrLes!
IsAturnjA LakesHOmeOWnPl I'rUMSa1. *ne v:oosed .:e 0, She pfoplfty know De limned Ica resrdew'm
7e'. alOpnlPnl .:-ly
IN ACCCRDANCE Tn.y - _JH LI A I E STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
S GN ING THIS PE - 11 10%
SIncef21'y
Curet l
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Hama p'Iease v-1, Q"6 Sri oc, )-e0+7 (r/tf� ate.�+
Sa1u+nla Lanes Mome0wnef address. t 415S?0.11l�R ` CA I\ Cq t.0t)(7 I �aPl�ff + C 3 q I (IF
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Marc & Stacy BIck Date: 08.29.17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1770 Ribbon Fan Lane, Naples, FL 34119
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
C ` (sfgn�ature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
PL's n 11 ine
co, t� 1,I
13 � U
Date: 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 19 S'0l
_
_I S `lc�
mi
IJG
DG � mck Lir—
M
r o ).{
sCIII�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
�7 a (signature) /l I 1 /
Saturnia Lakes Ho eowner Name (please print): l.kCf S'r7l�l_ Pool o ( Date: 31 3 D�7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 33 1 i—T S�'• ��
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): C-1 ate: 1�6: - �" )
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 17cn \ rL /k J C -'LE ))A4 1FQ 1, N }- f_ 3Cj) I I
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
C� r F signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):✓ 6 C M d S L��Date:
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:9- 3�3 (3 Lt T TERF(. 7 FA Lyf�l0 LL T T ERF(. 7 FA L M
Y
- ""�Mmmml
.� - t•Q 0.O f4�n �OPM1 wr♦m
YI! tiVY�.
LAmw d
Bd trallima CiWu CfMh1I1rY1(NYID
Wa, Or aopa.gr oaeera of Smvraa Lakes Opp"*�earidct d obpthe prdpoaal for rer PUDZ-PL2C 1 bOnC Ig0ClearyfNandsnttN .
Cleary planned Urat Develop wa ,T ^w) bcalad n the w INIV of ifnn` alga Road and Satumm
Lake Ovd. Tfe pmpoeW care d she P' ly a for rowOa,hlai and i 7r group nousvrg td senr«s W e urge
flat BOW of Canty ComNesongrs Id deny ate rozone k±+ the nosownq reasons
I – The appadels(U hens Iagreatad a zoned height d 45-50 feat for group housrng, the VOPO d n.e,ght
aadaads dM d at ather tluadnga m fhe ate_ F Wrra ➢arid Use E WTwwn (FLUE) Policy 5 4 squires rrw
prgeci kh ba dant I __ _ wit, and compMrnwAaly to "Murad'k19 tared uses The proposed deuahy and
prap"" q"o lemming building herd of 45-50 feel n r gna,,, dy weer o, nigher tom the ,mnrduM0ly
agadara Baaana Left" and otter resdennal develupr eMe m ae gree We we as" the Board of Cour me
Caha�t tOnvfiat 10 rem" to the proposed RPUD and m keep the dansty and Ina he+ght d buildings
naprnpyhopd Radelm b regalemal propenes ,n the co—undty
2-- The aPpbrr sl neve rsquesfea a berme floe group wus ng Future %aid Use EkuTwwm(FLU ))ous,n9 use
requ,res now proprts 10 be cornpabole wrm and complementary to surrauredlrq uses.
,a more eeraae to an aeetupdnaLYommaraal type of lana use awe a reshdandat land use rAvch is cteany
atoonrpaume wan me Sauna LJ afs resdentW developmed. m add Mon. the proposes 200 urns of group
hcuouenV prepnu re .nvrred,ately adlacera to Sat wma Lakes wh,cn vroJd letdy mpact Saturnna Lake
hpna0wrr properly values Please mannan see value of cur com,naubesl
The proposed use of the property shaJd O> IMY14ed to a revdenGal
devalpipnfonl only.
➢N ACCORDANCE WITH FLOfl➢DA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SK3NMrIfi THIS PE MON.
$stun: Lakes Moff*owr)e! Name IPhease PIVl(j. '-y-jos- A��p DW
Satum+a tabes t+orr➢eowf>ef address '- '
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal, The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
{signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): '7&I o' -W Ala.
jFf r Date: r7 -e95 - D/j
9 / / Ala
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: �S'� vffPr v /. m
Iv'�01'es/ FL ' 3¢/ r 9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties In the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Denise A. lollie Date: 08/29/17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1381 Areca Cove, Naples. FL 34119
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): J���le/24n.
per: Z 9 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 20014 .4-me"o
(r ay
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
l � (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please pdnt): Chrl S -h4'1 f Si r/C� peS ,,,,;Date, Q if Zj JZO ( }
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
f>
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Gl+rj-� ate, 4 SrY?I:l Qe--1 , .)Date: Oil
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: I S-2-e17A«1 c Cy
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
4 signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Tenn'tcr —Date: �D f
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �I t� 1SIA .112 Pf�lMt7.
NcVAes) FL 3�11�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 – The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
��'r'Z/7 zco signature)
r
Saturnla Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): LM(�O S Date: a, I
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: ACI 1 SIO ,1 )e WMCk— G F612
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
r/�"� (' signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
?p u I t? //� I In c fZ
Date:
0 81 I > 1 r
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1 1 1 0
T R I F 111� (f i IN t r T �'< .
I'/p
p Lr? , 3 4f/ 19
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely.
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Lct%+-rft^8-'- bA— }4-e Irate: %1%11-7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 11 % V X%VL •� fvt . LGL. Jk N i�P l t f 3141141
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
/� (signature)
7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): t) / �;�Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 7 G� I✓�/`Y L'� moi/ �ii�'� rS Fe -
3 y/�
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
�i
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
/. (signature) I
Saturnia Lakes omeowner Name ('lease print): 6 !� ✓ �Co le Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
U i
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (plea/S,?
se priinnt): /' / ���� Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: / SG -? 0B VE
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
I — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): AuJGiI T ✓. V�,/,(�o / Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address' /� �� ��Gi9y? G✓✓t i!%/9f:=i`_r /-G J ��/,f'
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
or�at6fe) �f /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Oenl/6e- / // Zarb%5 Date:�,�,3_-
Saturnia /ia Lakes Homeowner address: a/3 y �la_S�a y fVCZ..
A117
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing. the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sier y,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): PAX`Xc 4, 6fe L.E✓� Date: C / —2Uw 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
V w (Signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (pi
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
o a -e (-es) �F�- -3411
�� _ Pk •Y �A M A'.
LMw m
Boars o•Ca, toun'y tomossare•s
*e. re DrDpert owners -T Setuma Lakes oppose a .J e.DJen N*pro •or reicme PUD2-PL2nl WK r?85
C Bary Resaenvl Planr� •Nr. Je:k!IopmxY. iRPUO-• xa1sV �� the vlcnry IX �rtr+R'MaV_e 9oao dnd Swam• a
Lakes Buvd i -,e ; r7puieo usa _' t F: �perly a ry •ey.xrl,� a•N v g•._.p .,Dusrg I -r sent,a W e _rx
ria Bard =1 C:nrtrrC fimss triers W deny Zhe rei+le k• me tosory reasDn S
-The attwams ra. a a-±d'evger. tr ai ]f_ reef tx :roup truing Irio_ ss: ^a ]ri
ex -e> 5 rat IX a, ctfw pudoe-gs r re sea F.T.rs a• ?s Elerteaa @FLUE', PDkct 5.1 reaures -e.v
wore is 4 be careakPe w@r and ct•rpier+Wrtavy to s..rtouvrg Lard uses The pr3ws d ]e ty and
prapf'i Q ¢0u9 M1hlr3 Z ddng herTl of 05-50 tc_- s _w.Cwgv a wr w -' *w t -a BL nvr.?& lel,,
adww. Sao -� Lases a omen +esKmrw 9evewpmerrs r re area We are a " Ire Bowra oe Cowry
C.�sronns not t rezane r; Je pcy sea RPD a a r:..z T densrr and t• rognr v :wdnys n tr e
ne Wrvaamoca sx w to resdennal prope•5es n trr cx -.rv.
2 -Toe appvcarps! nave tea.estea a rez::'a+a grcu: n_.ry �,g. F.tve . ,c Jse Ekk^ A .FLUE Pokct 5 4
reQW?5 r1eW D•:'RL=S •A Oe :t^1DatID12 w'1F' df•C CM'�M.MkTn dIY :D i./r'>�n6ng Id•V YiPi CYv.•p Hc'.iYn3 4ie
a I e •Y•rila• ID iY 'G7LOC�d1'=CfMWCdI type :1 Lm z uS PH' a teidwum is 162 M'{f• 6 i*Wv
vI[DrnyaaL•e v1�T :rti= ]dllrr` d Lak2i •ei9efirai Yr2]prtenl M b!' M,b11 +t12 p10p,iY`d 2^C u'.K � g10�¢
wusng pc;tse_ w# w kmle6atere adtacetr q Sat_m Lakes WrKe, v _-j I+ v r•Ipa- SaF.-a .-sae
+'grneOwMel pM?^.: ra••� Pes•r maM�an Re':dkY_ o• c.r:omr.ldeY
SahesW Lien HomeoWner P+oposa! 'ne prO005s_-d uY D' 712 pcteay Shc4d Je' ^red lc a resdenmal
leuelopmerr
N ACCORDAA�= :. - . _ - _ - i = -:.!E PLEASE USE +OUR F_ORIDA ADOPESs WrEY
S1GNrvG THIc
�Sncerery.
�n U�
lsrgraLre-
Saturnia Lm. _ •iomeownen Nan :pease Pwdl: f ,jer d (cLm GakdmDate. o I Ia ji %
Sawma La _-iomeowner address 13 4 Ay e ea C oue_
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
� �''/(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): �Ac..i✓JT �� i[c �� Date: a�
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: I S„7y SaL�r Ji /�f mA C �' • /��- 5 .1�, S�iis
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
O� (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): fV g�,sio Jp Df}w /`,b Date: �o
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: -2-1Y-2 lf/4911-9 pT / WLAJy cl 3 'Y11
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely
r r ' Is-wature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: l it 01,a l )0 ,�
'8-16-1�1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Q CJ signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): b5 A t, J -Q CLs c n Date: � Z1 7-0I r7
. . . I .
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
21 y
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
L
(signature) ^n
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /' IQfy 1 oV!✓LO
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
V
(signature)
Zs,L yrs+
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 1Aova6w Rr� d Q'Wiv` rrornu n.._Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
n /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pleaseiprint): �� 1 / Date: ^/G ^ /
Saturnia ia Lakes Homeowner address: �� / ��PLd Ave ; 'dewy%1ta f �����
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20180001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
_X(signa ure) '
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:T�—
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
('0
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
ease print):(^ H tR / S %.Al !: O Q d 8tV J Date: A�y/ t /
ZI A IUIIJ 6111V LA' AIIV SEs f=-lL- 3 iii 9
Jan 23 02 09 47p Reliant Card Acceptance 9732855211 p.2
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and ! or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
I -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45.50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more simlar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner properly values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /�C nit / �' " / Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Lefler to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001965,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincer y, -
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):✓/1 L li / �l GD/ Date: S,//5//7
/
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: i 6 ` � ���� "�`�' le4
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and 1 or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Satumla Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
!iI he 1� f fo,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address. ;e_ r 1 i LOL �-
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located In the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties In the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Saturnia Lak-'` Homeowner Name (pi
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
ZS�SLSt�� �jJ..l Zj{f}JENa j/� 0VELE5S- GAFFE/�l/
Saturnia Lakes Home wner Na a (please print): NC- 17H2FE /A) Date:/quciJ 20/7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: /5--'
N,qp/-E 5, /Q -y 3y l I R
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
5u�" signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
YD
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerelv.
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 'D&S/ml Date: b 3I
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: [ %I 5eM!Y 1^Yn ' I've
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
G �(s!gnature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Robert & Stacy Kastner Date: 8/16/17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 1555 Windamere Lane Naples, FL 34119
Lefter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
I -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
"._(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Gklze�� SAce'M[i Date.
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �� I rrr�2 y c�Nc PD iNl G
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and ! or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature) � /
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ! 4, rd. �4-T�t� o,- Date: 20
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: i `f `4 Hot-
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area, Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses, The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities'
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Z'�ature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): DG ✓I LTV Date Y111,11!7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address.
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (ple'�attr se print): ta!1 4 Art'4 e— Qs � �2 t�`4 U Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �'7
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd The proposed use of the property is for residential and/or group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5 4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities'
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
q��
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: x-),1'11
AIA PLC:�sI I Z-, �f Il
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001965,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communitiesl
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Z?. L La v- /I ) Y Z -L.. Dater g
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address,/A5-j4 / r-
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
LOG -'-a (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): -A;�W`J O W 61'j 5 Date: g !
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: Z 3 �{ Z r—�r Sh L "J
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sin
c
3,
(signature) ,,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Lt � 1 neo\ (Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
FL 314
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feel for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 —The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
v l�lN° (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Fara Singer ,.:8/14/17
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: 1626 Triangle Palm Terrace
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons -
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
/ (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): I C e N ` (7 ' -TriUate:JF— -7'.;L0 r 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
/"J2-/0 FL"'' 3vir9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
'',,1
1^ (signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
A n tl
—� .
Date:
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address: I q l �
..LS(a
`e-\
3
yWLI
1 '.^�. [M4 C.r rC(e.
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): /��y Y A� /' ` r Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: _,� y3 0 ,&A--� t-/- �� y �r' /) V
W e. the property ovrt,ers of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposes for rezone PUDZ-PL2016000INS
.
Cleary Residential Planned Una Development IRPUD) located in the s nay of Immokalee Road and Saturtsa
Lakes Blvd The prdoosed use of the property is for residential and ; or group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of county can"fisloners to deny the rezone for 1" fol+owng reasons.
I .- The applicari have requested a zoned nelgni of 45-50 tees for group nouvng, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buadings In the area. Future Land Use Element IFLUEI PU¢y 5 a requires new
projects to be compabb+e wan and complementary, to surrounding lan0 uses. The proposed density, and
Proposed group housing building height of 45.50 feet rs sgmficantly larger or higher than the anmediate v
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Cemmrssoners not to rezone to me proposed RPUD ane to keep the density and the hergm of buddngs in the
neighborhood similar in res*enbal properties in OW community.
2 - The aoploanfisl have requested a hezcr for group nousing, Future Land Use Element IFLUC6 Pobcv 5 4
requires new projects to be compavCde svnh and complementary to surrourdrng and uses Group Rousing use
s more sander to an mStnubonaocommerclat type of land use than a resdenbal land use which is clearly
ncompatlble with the Satuma Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 urns of group
rousing proposed will be tmmedlately adjacent to Saturnia Lanes which would lwely impact Saaerua Lake
homeowner propene values. Please mantas the value of cur communities'
The proposed use of the property should be Iirtuted o a resloenhal
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Slncerey.
-��� Is�snature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name ;please pnrdf. Sr4 d e' YLA S S e n Date_ Y/7 11 /
Satuma Lakes Homeowner address 2 () a 5 Pa I R -h4 4 Fa' I m Dr 1 4 V--
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45.50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
t' signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pleas
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �^
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Nage (please print): W// GEy /C' -S Date: 08-t 3 ' u-Ol f
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: OOA J S� C /d1�� /77 /i C /ICA Lem
Fl- �Y/q
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
/GLCG�lil �GIcG `L (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): JTT�JG ,A( ✓ %�' Date: e, � -OT _,�G 17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2G%3 -Ts LA -0,r �A1(YA C (.A
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print)): '-zG/�W ✓ Cs�� Dat/e: / ! e�I1�
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: I O 0 /t� �� vrzY �SL%�dVG
L- HylJy
Letter to
Board of Collier Courdy Commxssnorevs
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone Pl1DZ-PL20160001985
Cleary Residential planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Imincil®lee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd The proposed "of the property is for residential and / a group housing for seniors We urge
the Board of County Commsmoners to deny the rezone for the follci reasons
1 — The applicart(s) have requested a zoned height of 4550 feet for group Causing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildups in the area. Future Lara UseElement (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding lana uses The proposed density ars
Proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet a signpicarty larger or highs than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners rot to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings In the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community
2 —The applicants) rave requested a rezone for group housing Fndum LandUse Element (FLUE) PbWy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Getup Housing use
is more simlar to an insttulionallcommemal type of land use than a residential land use which a Beady
Incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development In addition, the proposed 200 untsof gmup
housing proposed will be immediately actlacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lalke
homepwren pnopoty VdlUee Vleaae Ralnt8ln the value Of our CommtlMiesl
Satumta Lakes Norreowner Proposal, The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only
IN ACCORDANCE W RH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Since"
N Y � if n
Saturnia Lakes HOmeowrer Name(pleasepnnt): Whe-TZEEOF l.. CAP/ Data: B 7p/7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: OCJ73 !' fA.J`72: D /D,-� J �
lUr, Pt cs FL 34 /i 9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
('2",
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): hre, i%i�, Grew Date: $ 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following masons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
� r (ignature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses- Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionallcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
4signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): 5
�gnur�i i Ig SC � f-- Date: 9. If . 1
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: (0-o -I N4T LY.t G o N A OOL 5 34111
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and I or group housing for seniors- We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutionaUcommercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print). ,ill E l_ I R L. • UJJJ 1` n)pp Date9//A/ / %
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 11-1% 32JN5uComa d • 9,Nlli . L'fr �-• 3411
q
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Pronosal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
L(signature)
(9t12 Q Kvr✓ T/�Kac+�i �%%IaRI/lA/�p���
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 2 / 198 Amct R90 G�Y�/ Rp fPS F) 3 y/1
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the properly should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): Pl L / ,f Date: d$- f 0, 27�(�17
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:/ / 6 in� I i ESbBtir Forr�r Z,-rr-c / ✓ate{
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing: the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 -The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
s §113ture)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): )1 r CPP t•1?'17 1, 7-0 /7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: /V'/b KINti .5""b (fr. A/-rL951 )lL 3cf—aif
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature) 1/
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): SA' -1 -1 J Otld r/ Date: -7
,I/
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: X330 8�[-T46CX y / 94,1) 4R • 34th y
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located
in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the
property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge the Board of
County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the
proposed height exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and proposed group
housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the
immediately adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area.
We are asking the Board of County Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed
RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the neighborhood similar to
residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and
complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use is more similar to an
institutional/commercial type"of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed
200 units of group housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes
which would likely impact Saturnia Lake homeowner property values. Please maintain
the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be
limited to a residential development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA
ADDRESS WHEN SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
r is L ces Homeowner Name (please print): �r �(% V/ 1 Date
:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
V )� (signature)
i
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): I Date:
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Zr _rW kN Asia '
Collier County Commissions Office
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, FL 34112
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of aft other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feel is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential devetopment. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnla Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
4 (signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):II '' �) V \(L��(10 l�Zl Date: U/
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: ) � c 'A u .n h � w-) C --Ir
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Satumia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applioant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely Impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(sig ature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print):
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: �'.S JJi.y,7r4^44.ye 4A . N¢a<tiS
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 -- The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): ]Ee5j q & f/o�r e fl— Date: Of -
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: &cLOJCS ,CL 3 ')l �9
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Si ly,
(signature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (pl
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address:
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other bulldings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties In the community.
2 — The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
Is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is clearly
Incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Saturnia Lakes which would likely Impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
Ca(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): D(v t ck /041/11'n Date: / 7
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 7 );Z Nen is S FL TY//9
Lefler to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Saturnia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and 1 or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 - The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing; the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Saturnia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2 - The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is Beady
incompatible with the Saturnia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Saturnia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
l
�.()gnature)
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): _ "aA L_ Date: '0
i
Saturnia Lakes Homeowner address: 11s-110 (- "t--
Letter to
Board of Collier County Commissioners
We, the property owners of Saturnia Lakes oppose and object the proposal for rezone PUDZ-PL20160001985,
Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) located in the vicinity of Immokalee Road and Satumia
Lakes Blvd. The proposed use of the property is for residential and / or group housing for seniors. We urge
the Board of County Commissioners to deny the rezone for the following reasons.
1 — The applicant(s) have requested a zoned height of 45-50 feet for group housing, the proposed height
exceeds that of all other buildings in the area. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new
projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. The proposed density and
proposed group housing building height of 45-50 feet is significantly larger or higher than the immediately
adjacent Satumia Lakes and other residential developments in the area. We are asking the Board of County
Commissioners not to rezone to the proposed RPUD and to keep the density and the height of buildings in the
neighborhood similar to residential properties in the community.
2—The applicant(s) have requested a rezone for group housing. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4
requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses. Group Housing use
is more similar to an institutional/commercial type of land use than a residential land use which is dearly
incompatible with the Satumia Lakes residential development. In addition, the proposed 200 units of group
housing proposed will be immediately adjacent to Satumia Lakes which would likely impact Satumia Lake
homeowner property values. Please maintain the value of our communities!
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Proposal: The proposed use of the property should be limited to a residential
development only.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE STATUE PLEASE USE YOUR FLORIDA ADDRESS WHEN
SIGNING THIS PETITION.
Sincerely,
(signature)
Satumia Lakes Homeowner Name (please print): r �U �j d Date: E12117
Satumia Lakes Homeowner address:
Prepared September 22, 2017
Cleary RPUD
(PL20160001985)
Application and Supporting
Documents
October 5, 2017 CCPC Hearing
PDF Page 1 of 194
PDF Page 2 of 194
Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375
3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266
Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com
November 14, 2016
Mr. Daniel J. Smith, AICP
Principal Planner
Land Development Services
Growth Management Division
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Cleary RPUD Rezone – PL20160001985
Dear Mr. Smith:
Attached, please find copies of a Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Rezone for properties located in the south side of Immokalee Road west of Saturnia
Lakes Boulevard.
This application proposes to rezone 9± acres from the A Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit
Development Zoning District to allow a maximum of 65 residential dwelling units or 200 units of group
housing for seniors.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
D. Wayne Arnold, AICP
c: Raymond J. Cleary Jr.
Thomas J. Cleary
Richard D. Yovanovich
GradyMinor File
PDF Page 3 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or
PUD to PUD Rezone
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code
Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative
Code
PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F.
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________
Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________
Firm: _________________________________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________
Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that
you are in compliance with these regulations.
To be completed by staff
4/15/2015 Page 1 of 16
✔
Raymond J Cleary Jr
3120 60th Street SW Naples FL 34116
(407) 803-4670
royalpalmlawn@aol.com
D. Wayne Arnold, AICP / Richard D. Yovanovich
Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs FL 34134
239.947.1144
warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com
PDF Page 4 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION
Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach
to the completed application packet.
a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage
of such interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
4/15/2015 Page 2 of 16
Raymond J Cleary JR 50
3120 60th Street SW, Naples Fl 34116
Thomas J Cleary Family Trust 50
Thomas J Cleary, Trustee, 3120 60th Street SW, Naples Fl 34116
Beneficiary of Trust - Lori Cleary 100
PDF Page 5 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust:
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired _______________
Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option: _________________________
Date option terminates: __________________, or
Anticipated closing date: _________________
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to
the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility
of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
4/15/2015 Page 3 of 16
1996 and 2000
PDF Page 6 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to
the ________________________________zoning district(s).
Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________
Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________
Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________
PROPERTY INFORMATION
On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the
property covered by the application:
x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a
separate legal description for property involved in each district;
x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months,
maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and
x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise
concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be
required.
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________
Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________
Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________
Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C):
Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial
Mixed Use Other: ________________
4/15/2015 Page 4 of 16
A, Agricultural
Residential Planned Unit Development
Undeveloped
Residential and/or Group Housing for Seniors
N.A.
N.A.
28 48 26
Please see Exhibit 1
00194920009 and 00195080003
9+/-
7576 Immokalee Road
PDF Page 7 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning Land Use
N
S
E
W
If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal
description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application.
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________
Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition.
Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County
Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774.
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
4/15/2015 Page 5 of 16
ROW and H.D. Development PUD Livingston Road and Residential
Rigas PUD Residential
Rigas PUD Residential
A Undeveloped
Saturnia Lakes Homeowners Association
1310 Saturnia Grande Drive Naples FL 34119
Olde Cypress Master Property Owners Association Inc.
9150 Galleria Court Suite 201 Naples FL 34109
PDF Page 8 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code,
staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the
applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement
describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup
materials and documentation in support of the request.
a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract,
or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate
to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of
such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings
and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county
attorney.
c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth
Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision
allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of
that Sub-district, policy or other provision.)
d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners
association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the
request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
4/15/2015 Page 6 of 16
PDF Page 9 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been
held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing?
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year?
Yes No if so please provide copies.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E.
of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a
written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B.
of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements.
Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing
advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the
Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately.
RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall
record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments
or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of
the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the
Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the
recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided
to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said
Memorandum or Notice.
LDC subsection 10.02.08 D
This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been
made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be
considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or
ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the
rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will
not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed
withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new
application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”.
Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code.
4/15/2015 Page 7 of 16
PDF Page 10 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code
Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code
PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code
The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time
of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
REQUIREMENTS # OF
COPIES REQUIRED NOT
REQUIRED
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of
why amendment is necessary
Completed Application with required attachments
Pre-application meeting notes
Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2
Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2
Completed Addressing Checklist 2
Warranty Deed(s) 3
List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2
Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4
Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4
Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with
project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included
on aerial.
5
Statement of Utility Provisions 4
Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4
Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with
project planner at time of public hearings.
Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include
copies of previous surveys. 4
Traffic Impact Study 7
Historical Survey 4
School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2
Electronic copy of all required documents 2
Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+
List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this
document is separate from Exhibit E)
Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy
Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if
Amending the PUD
Checklist continued onto next page…
4/15/2015 Page 11 of 16
PDF Page 11 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined
Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1
*If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement
+The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:
Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code
Exhibit D: Legal Description
Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each
Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments
If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas
Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at
239-690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.”
PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
School District (Residential Components): Amy
Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan
Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad
Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District:
City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other:
FEE REQUIREMENTS
Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00
PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00
Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application
meeting): $2,500.00
Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00
Transportation Review Fees:
o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the
Methodology Meeting*
*Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting.
o Minor Study Review: $750.00
o Major Study Review $1,500.00
Legal Advertising Fees:
o CCPC: $925.00
o BCC: $500.00
School Concurrency Fee, if applicable:
4/15/2015 Page 12 of 16
PDF Page 12 of 194
Cleary PUD
Exhibit 1
Legal Description
October 14, 2016 Page 1 of 1
PARCEL 1
(OR 2651, PG 2615)
THE WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE
1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 2
(OR 5355, PG 1948)
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER AND STATE OF FLORIDA
PARCELS 1 & 2 CONTAINING 8.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS COMBINED
PDF Page 13 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 1 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code,
staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of
the applicable criteria.
Narrative Statement Describing Request
The Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) proposes to develop up to 63
residential dwelling units or 200 units of group housing for seniors on 9± acres. The property
is located on the south side of Immokalee Road adjacent to the western PUD boundary of
Saturnia Lakes.
The property is located in the Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Us Future Land Use Category.
The property meets the criteria for and infill project and is eligible under Section 4.07.02 A.2
for rezoning to a PUD, because it shares two common boundaries with developed parcels.
Under the density rating system of the Future Land Use Element, the property is eligible to see
a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre as an infill parcel. Provisions have been added to the
PUD requiring that any density above 4 units per acre developed on the property must utilize
the density bonus provisions by transferring 1 unit per acre from Sending Lands in accordance
with the requirements of the infill provision of the Future Land Use Element.
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation
to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities.
All infrastructure is available to support the proposed residential or group housing
units. The project is adjacent to residential development to the north, south and east,
therefore the redevelopment of the site for residential is consistent with the nearby
development pattern.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation a nd
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at
public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after
consultation with the county attorney.
The applicant is the owner of the parcels that make up the 9± acre RPUD.
PDF Page 14 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 2 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth
Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other
provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or
conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.)
The Cleary RPUD is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Collier
County Growth Management Plan. The proposed PUD shares a common access with
the neighboring property owner to the west; therefore, t he PUD is consistent with
Objective 7 and encouraging interconnectivity of projects.
Policy 5.3 encourages use of urban lands in order to discourage urban sprawl.
Development of this infill property is consistent with this Policy.
Policy 5.4 requires new projects to be compatible with and complementary to
surrounding land uses. The proposed density is higher than the immediately adjacent
Saturnia Lakes project; however, property immediately to the west is eligible to seek
the same maximum density as the proposed Cleary PUD. Further, development
standards have been proposed which address building heights, setbacks and buffers
assuring compatibility with the nearby development.
Policy 5.8 permits group housing uses within the urban designated area. One of the
proposed uses in the PUD is group housing for seniors, age 55 and over. The proposed
PUD is consistent with this Policy.
The property does have areas of native vegetation, which in accordance with the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element requires on-site preservation of 15%
of the existing native vegetation. The conceptual Mast er Plan identifies 1.07± acres as
preserve. This meets the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element of the Growth Management Plan.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and
screening requirements.
Properties located to the south and east are developed with residential. Immokalee
Road is to the north and undeveloped agricultural land is to the west. Access to the
subject site will be via a shared access on Immokalee Road. Development standards
have been established which insure compatibility of the proposed residential and group
housing units with surrounding properties. Buffers will be provided per the LDC to
insure compatibility with immediately adjacent properties.
PDF Page 15 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 3 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC for the group
housing or residential development options.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to
support future development on the site. There are no known capacity issues th at will
impact this project.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
The Cleary RPUD is surrounded by zoned, developed and undeveloped land. Expansion
of the RPUD boundary is not proposed.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as
meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of s uch
regulations.
The Cleary RPUD proposes to include uses and development standards appropriate for
the site and consistent with the Land Development Code.
Comprehensive Planning Review #1 Comments:
Residential In-fill: To encourage residential in-fill in urban areas of existing development outside
of the Coastal High Hazard Area, a maximum of 3 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be
added if the following criteria are met [staff analysis follows in bracketed text]:
(a) The project is 20 acres or less in size; [the site comprises ±9 acres]
The parcel is approximately 9+/- acres in size and is less than the 20 acre maximum
parcel size required under the infill density bonus criteria.
(b) At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer;
[County water and wastewater service is available to serve this area]
PDF Page 16 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 4 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
The project has water and sewer availability at the site and Collier County has water
and sewer facilities in the Immokalee Road ROW available to serve t he project.
(c) The project is compatible with surrounding land uses; [this determination is made by
Zoning Services staff in their review of the petition in its entirety]
The project proposes either residential dwellings or group housing for seniors. The PUD
includes development standards, including buffers and well located preservation areas
that demonstrate compatibility with the adjacent residences in the Saturnia Lakes
community. The parcel immediately to the west is zoned Agriculture and under t he
Growth Management Plan, would be eligible to seek a PUD that would include uses
comparable to those proposed for the Cleary PUD.
(d) The property in question has no common site development plan with adjacent property;
[presumably not, but the petitioner needs to verify this]
There is no common site plan with the adjacent property. The adjacent property to the
south and east is developed as the Saturnia Lakes community. The parcel to the west
is zoned Agriculture and there are no applications pending with Collier County for any
development on that site. Consistent with the Objective 7 of the Future Land Use
Element, a potential shared access/interconnect is shown on the PUD master plan to
the property west of the Cleary PUD.
(e) There is no common ownership with any adjacent parcels; [the petitioner needs to
demonstrate this]
There is no common ownership with the two adjacent properties. The proper ty to the
south and east is owned by the Saturnia Lakes HOA, and the property to the west is
owned by Oakwood Park West, LLC.
(f) The parcel in question was not created to take advantage of the in -fill residential density
bonus and was created prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management
Plan on January 10, 1989; [the petitioner needs to demonstrate this]
The Cleary PUD consists of two parcels of land that have been separate land parcels
from approximately 1976 to present. The two s eparate parcels were acquired by the
Cleary family. The parcels were not created to take advantage of the density bonus
provision as they were tax parcels of record prior to the establishment of this policy in
1989.
PDF Page 17 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 5 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
(g) Of the maximum 3 additional units, one (1) dwelling unit per acre shall be transferred
from Sending Lands; and, [this commitment needs to be included in Exhibit F, Developer
Commitments – also specifying that the first DU/A (9 units) over the base density of 4
DU/A (36 DUs) must be derived from TDR credits]
A commitment is included in the PUD document that indicates that no more than 37
residential units are permitted until additional units are transferred from Sending
Lands. The parent parcel before the recent Collier County ROW acquisition from th e
Cleary family for expansion of Immokalee Road was 9.25 acres, which at 4 du/ac results
in an eligible density of 37 dwelling units.
(h) Projects qualifying under this provision may increase the density administratively by a
maximum of one dwelling unit per acre by transferring that additional density from
Sending Lands”. [The County’s regulations provide for this density increase via a rezone of
the property]
The applicant is utilizing the rezoning process to address the potential density bonus
provision; therefore no administrative density increase is necessary.
LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas
F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of
land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County
Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Co mmission
has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when
applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
Yes, the proposed use for group housing for seniors, or conventional residential
development at a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Collier
County Growth Management Plan. Staff’s analysis concludes that the project is
consistent with the Plan.
2. The existing land use pattern.
North: Commercial and residential
South: Residential
East: Residential
PDF Page 18 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 6 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
West: Residential
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The PUD will not create an isolated district. The property to the east is also zoned
as planned development.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The PUD boundary is logically drawn and represents the entirety of the acreage
controlled by the applicant.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary.
Development of the site for uses consistent with the GMP requires rezoning of the
property.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
The proposed change will not negatively influence living conditions. Landscape
buffers will be established in accordance with the LDC to provide for appropriate
screening between adjacent uses. The PUD contains development standards
including building setbacks, building heights and maximum intensities of use.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of
peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The TIS included with the PUD indicates that capacity exists on Immokalee Road.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The project will be permitted through the SFWMD and will provide discharge
through the Saturnia Lakes community as permitted by their SFWMD permit.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
PDF Page 19 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 7 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
The development of this site will not reduce light and air to adjacent properties.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area.
It is not expected that this separate PUD will have any impact on property values in
the adjacent area. Project buffers and development standards have been
established to minimize impact to adjacent properties.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
The proposed PUD will not be a deterrent to development of the remaining vacant
parcel located immediately to the west of the subject property. Shared access will
be provided for that property in order to minimize driveway connections on
Immokalee Road.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The rezoning to a PUD will not grant a special privilege to the property owner.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning.
The property is zoned A, Agriculture, which requires a rezoning to permit residential
densities consistent with the Growth Management Plan.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the county.
The proposed PUD contains development standards that are similar to those
established for the neighboring Rigas PUD.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
It is possible to find other sites that would permit group housing for seniors, or
residential development; however, the proposed site is an infill parcel and is
centrally located to urban services.
PDF Page 20 of 194
Cleary RPUD
Exhibit 2
Evaluation Criteria
August 17, 2017 Page 8 of 8
CPRZ Exh 2 Evaluation Criteria_v3.docx
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
The development of the site for any use will require removal of vegetation and
importation of fill material.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended.
All levels of service will be maintained after development of the site .
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
The PUD is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and includes uses that are
compatible with the existing and planned development adjacent to the property.
PDF Page 21 of 194
Crounty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104
12t91252-2400
Pre-Application Meeting Notes
Petition Type:RPUD
Date and Time:8/24/16
Assigned Planner:DANIEL JAMES SMITH
Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's):
Project lnformation
Project Name:
Property tD #. t9 492009l19500003
Project Address:City:
GRADY MINOR
State: _ Zip: _
Applicant:
City: _ State: _ Zip: _Agent/Firm Address:
Property Owner:
Please provide the following, if applicable:
i. Total Acreage:
ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: _
iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: _
iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number:
v. lf there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the
type and number:
vi. lf the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/Ptf:
Pt#: PL20150001985
Current zoning:
WAYNE ARNOLD -.ASent Name: Pnone: _
PDF Page 22 of 194
r C-,oUn w
COI-TIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
(.239t. 2s2-24OO
Meeting Notes
5'4
J 0-o"0 Phr."riyro re,avr+':. z A,trJr".ss o,r,"olinc"e- ce r".l Ft J6ffi p.tt, s.4 ., TL4LOr,J:I*.. " ^.-a[
t-/l/Y
PURttc- unun€.< * Lrl FIl 7O €^.l'Ez :A, t)*n=( ArvD
r^v\<7€Dk1fl? ---c2ttt r.E TD Civ t-r--,t <iNt r>F lAt4
R> I <tilGiE <-ia MuD t7-?fu,vtp <rltT7uu lS )e<rfu=$
T, Ql€ Au, r-hR1d ?Pf-RnES Ft=tzEf-il kEl,^)
Rt-rrD AJvD il,tatokAc ,t/fS .oTl+Fnttr<{ C-arA
za,->rt-t-Qw utztt,f:, Rfuttl-F A ct*lAutorTY [UzqD ST+nD/)
/hi> \tL€<-ouu*t- h:ae= w Der. tttt+okALfta flxl
t U lr)4)at€C ?A'riYa <i*Pvc t^,lifr? A/lAt,J c2il .A)/<tt\€
A.,^zt:, Lt" Atc rckE twt^)W HA*il n+R> oPT-/),<)
M*/ ILE TD C.a,urO€<-T TD Oq pW- Di1ut /Wr..r)
h^,/D 8' pv<- pv<gE A,l*ttt 9a^viy'6 s7tT7'L<,,ojA cArce
&lF 5utrFtct€-,.u-- c*liart chp E. V-l4t><,tsrre4tn
q lTnht irI Lrz GttLge.0+
t1a,s* t ,itt L'/ u\
L , dirctr<rr
)--lt - V)c.rr +
^J --a./L
-Nl C (,|fI
I
1u
€/-
rc)t I FSt.r-q(--E E+.r
h
8,5
\I
PDF Page 23 of 194
Crouuty
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
lztgl252-2400
Meeting Notes
COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTM€NT
www.collierPov.net
PDF Page 24 of 194
C-ounty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.collierqov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
123912s2-2400
Meeting Notes
PDF Page 25 of 194
C.,ounty
COI.TIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAG€MENT DEPARTMENT
www. co llie rgov. n et
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
(239) 2s2-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-53s8
The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time
of application submittal, At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted.
Pre-Appl ication Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
I eUO Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code
Amendment to PUo- ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative code
PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code
foF
coPtEs REQUIRED NOT
REQUIRED
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of
why amendment is necessary
Completed Application with required attachments
Pre-application meeting notes
2Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized
2Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control
2Completed Addressins Checklist
Warranty Deed(s)3
List ldentifi/ing Owner and all parties of corporation 2
Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4
Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 t
Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with
project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included
on aerial.
5
Statement of Utility Provisions 4
Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4
Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental
lmpact Statement (ElS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with
pro.iect planner at time of public hearings.
Listed or Protected Species survey, less than L2 months old. lnclude
copies of previous surveys.
4
tTraffic lmpact Study 1
Historical Survey 4
School lmpact Analysis Application, if applicable 2
Electronic copy of all required documents 2
Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)'
List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this
document is separate from Exhibit E)F
Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One I %" x 11" copy
Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 16" - Only il
Amending the PUD
Checklist continued onto next pate...
I'II-II-II-IITLI-I
III
Ir'lJ.-IMII-I
III-IIII-III!II-ILI-I
4/Ls/207s Page 11 of 16
REQUIREMENTS
tr +tr
I
I
I
!
I
{tr
{{tr
d tr
tr
tr tr
T_T___tr__l
-Tr
tr
tr
rltr
--E--T--E]
PDF Page 26 of 194
Crouuty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliercov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
(239) 2s2-2400 FAx: (239) 252-6358
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined
Copy of Official lnterpretation and/or zoning Verification L
*lf located in lmmokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement
*The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:
- Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code
Exhibit D: Legal Description
Ll Exhibit E: List of Requested LDc Deviations and iustification for each
Ll Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments
lf located in RFMU (Rural Fring e M ixed Use) Receivins Land Areas
Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b. )i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at
239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan."
PLANNERS - INOICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
Pre-Application Meeting: S500.00
PUD Rezone: 510,000.00* plus 525.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
f PUD to PUD Rezone: 58,000.00* plus 525.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
PUD Amendment: 56,000.00* plus 525.00 an acre or fraction of an acre
X,€0mnretrensive Planning Consistency Review: S2,250.00
v Environmental Data Requirements-Els Packet (submittal determined at pre-application
meeting): s2,500.00
Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): S1,000.00
)4 Transportation Review Fees:
' F Methodology Review: 5500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the
' Methodology Meeting+
*Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting.
o Minor Study Review: 5750.00
. o Major Study Review 51,500.00 I
X ugat Advertising Fees: ut 'JD/ \ o ccPC ''/ l>'o -'
o BCC: 5500.00- School Concurrency Fee, if applicable:
tr School District (Residential Components): Amy
Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan
Utilities Engineeringr Kris VanLengen Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad
Emergency Management: Dan Summers lmmokalee Water/Sewer District
City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other
FEE REQUIREMENTS
4l|s/2OL5 Page 12 of 16
ln
tr
PDF Page 27 of 194
C-onnty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 2s2-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-53s8
o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in
coordination with the County
*Additionot fee for the Sth ond subsequent re-submittol will be occessed ot 20% of the originot fee.
All checks may be mode poyoble to: Board of County Commissioners
4/7s/207s Page 13 of 16
PDF Page 28 of 194
- Environmental Data Checklist// 2oi(,aq) t9fSProject Name
The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00
Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU.
WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of
Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with
academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management.
Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with
at least two years ol ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include
revision dates on resubmittals.
Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible,
provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction
plans, include this information on the site plans.
Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological
communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or
recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the
environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the
FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the
likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the suruey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager
or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS.
Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered
Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03
Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed
species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the
FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from Iisted
species and their habitats. Identifu the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the
location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay
o
a
o
,:/
Identify on a cunent aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the
Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP
or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction
plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identifu
on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores ofat least
0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality
wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order
approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be
reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation.
SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis
of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project
(post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls)
compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre-development conditions. The
analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must
demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario.
5 Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been
met.
4
9
(lI-
PDF Page 29 of 194
for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald
eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of
which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans.
10. For sites or portions ofsites cleared ofnative vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that
the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant
to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s)
are in compliance with the l0 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native
vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and
10.02.06.
tl dentily on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the
project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide
a legend for each ofthe FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale
provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the
above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. ln a separate report,
demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in
this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural
flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties.
13. Where off-site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on-site, demonstrate that the criteria in
section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type
ofdonation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisry the requirement. lnclude on the SDP or
final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification numbe(s) ofthe off-site parcel(s) if
off-site donation of land is to occur.
14. Provide the results ofany Environmental Assessments and/or Audits ofthe property, along with a narrative ofthe
measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP.
I5. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at thetime of first development order submittal for sites that
occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golfcourses, landfill orjunkyards
or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or
processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 1 l0 gallons at any point in time
were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional
with experience in the field ofEnvironmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine
pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard
Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected ofbeing used for mixing and at discharge point ofwater
management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a
background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient ofthe potentially contaminated
site. Soil sampling should occurjust below the root zone, about 6 to l2 inches below ground surface or as
otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site
Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant
levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are
over these levels. If this analysis has been done as parl of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be
submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP
standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been
submitted.
16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its
intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level.
?
?
12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA,
RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans.
PDF Page 30 of 194
7,,Provide j ustification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1
lr3.y.ifrequested. /f Et?U6//;0
Where applicable, provide evidence ofthe issuance ofall applicable federal and./or state oil and gas permits for
proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of
Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005.
For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each ofthe
applicable Objectives and Policies ofthe Conservation and Coastal Management Element ofthe GMP.
The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's
compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC I 0.02.02.4'.3 f)
The following to be determined at preapplication meeting:
PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package
applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies ofthe EIS shall be
provided to the Counfy Manager or designee prior to public hearings.
26. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required?
27. AdditionalComments
?
l8
23
19 Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area
and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive
WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk
Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use
applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the
project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified.
20. Demonstrate that the design ofthe proposed stormwater management system and analysis ofwater quality and
quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements ofthe Watershed Management regulations of3.07.00.
2 I . For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concem-Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC-
ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14.
22. For multi-slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is
consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements ofthe Manatee
Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02.
@
@
(!hoose those that apply)
V4. Provide overalldescription ofproject with respect to environmental and water management issues.
l/ b. Explain how project is consistent with each ofthe applicable objectives and policies in the CCME ofthe
/ GMP/c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and,/ toc.
L/d. Indi.ut. wetlands to be impacted and the effects ofthe impact to their functions and how the project's design
compensates for wetland impacts.
e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed
as mitigation for impacts to listed species.
28. Stipulations for approval (Conditions)
l/"//tr/ / ,uo/
PDF Page 31 of 194
Env
Project Name
ironmental PUDZ-PUDA Chec.klist (non-RIMU.1
Pt 20/6 oOO t9 i5
l. ls the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding
properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, R-FMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library
@
G)
O
G)
0
Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the
subject site boundary lines. Ifthe site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory
identifing upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch.3 G.l. Application Contents #24).
FLUCFCS Overlay -P627
Clearly identif the location ofall preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.4.2).
Preserve Label- P546
Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max.
amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utitity
and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B-D;3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve
Calculation - P547
Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1 .b. Preserve
Width - P60l
Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.4.3, include all 3 strata,
be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site
preservation areas orwildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550
Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25'from the boundary ofthe preserve boundary. No accessory
structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be
permitted within 10'ofthe boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity ofthe preserve (i.e.
stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifuing all
site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3;6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback-New
8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.4.2.1)
Listed Species - P522
Provide Environmental Data identifoing author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off-site
preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm
fields or golfcourse, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifing any site contamination.
(LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required- P 522
( I O. !U O Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02. 13.A.2)/ Master Plan Contents-P626
D shall include Preserve Tract section. When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested:
Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessorl Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC)
12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that
will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628
Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and
procedures ofthe LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds
The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase ofthe project.
I 3. Provide information for GIS?
Additional Comments
PDF Page 32 of 194
r Qouyrw
COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
4.23912s2-2400
Pre-Application Meeting Si
PL*: 30tut-*o c
I
n-ln Sheetqgs
Collier County Contact lnformation:
Name Review Discipline Phone
f chris Alcorn utiliw Billing 821 8136 chrisalcorn @colliergov.net
l l David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net
- Summer Araque Environmental Review 252 6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net
!Steve Baluch, P.E Transportation Planning 2s2-2367 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net
!Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252 57 82 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net
,( Rachel Beasley Zoning Services rachelbeasley@colliergov.net
Ll Marcus Berman County Surveyor 252 6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net
Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5t65 markburtchin@colliergov.net
n George Cascio utilitY Billing BeorBecascio@colliergov.net
- Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net
f Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 2s2-57 7s suefa u lkner@colliergov. net
J Dale Fey North Naples Fire 597 -3222 dalefey@colliergov.net
s.-Paula Fleishman lmpact Fee Administration 252 2924 paulaf leishman@colliergov.net
, l Nancy cundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net
Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687,5650 shingson@ccfco.org
I John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252 5757 joh nhouldsworth@colliergov. net
Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-57 44 jodihughes@colliergov.net
I Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliertov.net
Ll Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2937 ericjohnson@coll iergov.net
I /Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net
N/ steptren Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2975 stevelenberBer@colliergov.net_,L Garrett Louviere Stormwater 252 2526 garrettlouviere@colliergov.net
! Paulo Martins Utilities paulomartins@colliergov.net
r Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7 34a Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net
Jack McKenna, P.E Engineering Services 252 29t!jackmckenna@colliergov.net
Matt Mclean, P.E Principal Pro.iect Manager 252 8279 matthewmclean@collie rgov.net
Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility lmpact Fees 252 4215 Jihertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net
.l Annis Moxam Addressing 2s2 5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net
Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@coll ier ov.net
I Jessica Huckeba CAD Technician 252-2315 JessicaHuckeba@collie ov.net
L Brandy Otero Transit 2s2 s859 brandyotero@colliergov.net
Email
252-8202
252-5543
252-4285
PDF Page 33 of 194
C-ouuty
COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
Additional Attendee Contact lnformation :
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104
123912s2-2400
!Bill Pancake North Naples Fire s97 -3222 billpancake@colliergov.net
' Brandi Pollard Utility lmpact fees 252-6237 b ra nd ipollard @colliergov. net
g Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4271 fred reischl@colliergov. n et
Brett Rosenblum, P.E Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net
. - Edwin Sanchez Fire Review 252 7577 edwi nsanchez@colliergov.net
$ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net,f,
Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 2s2-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net
Chris Scott, AICP Plannin8 and Zoning 2s2-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net
I l- Peter shawinsky Architectural Review 252 8523 PeterShawinsky@colliergov.net
N Daniel smith, AlcP Zoning Services 2s2-4372 danielsmith@colliergov.net
!Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 2s2-7032 EllenSummers@colliergov.net
Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net
Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net
Chad Sweet Transportation 252-5687 chadsweet@collierogv.net
I Mark Templeton Landscape marktempleton@colliergov.net
Jon Walsh Building Review 2s2-2962 jonathanwalsh@collierBov.net
David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning 2s2-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net
I Kirsten wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net
- Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-57 48 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net
Representing Phone EmailName
P l)(YA^*,Dutrt< v-ai3-cta.Sbvol"rd lr. lou.,n os*
frwr"u ffi1rfiU /6^lo tlhh,r 9'l?-1/1 ? iral.urA o Ot^loo
D Ja^$J' L'L l"t''l \^l\(tr<[q5 i-153f .yo.,.'^.,rlLe 4 tui{,{ -
€Rrc F<.y Z'ZcfltA - loz-t €Rt cF(*@Axt t e,r? Gctt .t
*<sr9rgtS,en-iDet+aa*SLt-,r C.ertr4rgrrf/t1--el?'4.19 l{rf.F....r. E\,rv. ccx.*lrnO.r\*^ L- . <-a/a.
. a0-11
( v-r^.
,lco.\
<.a
252-24'15
PDF Page 34 of 194
Qovtnty
COTTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPtES, FLORIDA 34104
12391 252-24OO F AX l2t9l 2s2-s724
ADDRESSING CHECKLISI
Please complete the following and email to G M D_Add ressing@colliergov. net or fax to the Operations Division
al 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed bv
Addressinq oersonnel prior to pre-application meetinq, olease allow 3 davs for orocessinq.
Not all items will apply to every project. ltems in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section.
PETITION TYPE (lndicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
E BL (Blasting Permit)
E BD (Boat Dock Extension)
n Carnival/Circus Permit
E CU (Conditional Use)
n ExP (Excavation Permit)
n FP (Final Plat
fl LLA (Lot Line Ad.lustment)
E PNC (Project Name Change)
E PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
E PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
E PUD Rezone
E RZ (Standard Rezone)
trtrtrtrntrn!trtrntr
SOP (Site Development Plan)
SDPA (SDP Amendment)
SDPI (lnsubstantial Change to SDP)
SIP (Site lmprovement Plan)
SlPl (lnsubstantial Change to SIP)
SNR (Street Name Change)
SNC (Street Name Change - Unplatted)
TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
VA (Variance)
VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
SeeattachedPropertySummaries S2B T48 R26
FOLIO (Property lD) NUMBER(S) ol above (aftach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
001 95080003 and 001 94920009
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
7576 IMMOKALEE RD
. LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of pro.iecusite in relation to nearest public road right-
of-way
. SURVEY (copy - needed onlyfor unplatted properties)
CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only)
SDP - orAR or PL #
PDF Page 35 of 194
C,ounty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www,colliergov.net
28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPtES, FLORIDA 341O4
123912s2-240O FAX (2391 ?'52-s724
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
Please Return Approved Checklist By:Email Fax Personally picked up
Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour
Phone: 239.947 .1 144 Email/Fax: su mpen hou r@gradym inor.com
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name
approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
FolioNumber 00195080003
FolioNumber C019492)aC9
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Approved by:_A,L Date: B/71 /2A16
Date:Updated by:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
/1
PDF Page 36 of 194
Collier County Property Appraiser
Property Summary
Parcel No. 00195080003
Name / Address
Map No.
3828
CLEARY J& RAYMOND J
THOMAS J CLEARY TR
THOMAS J CLEARY FAMILY TRUST
UTD 2-17-00
3120 60TH ST SW
City NAPLES
Strap No.
000100 007 3B28
Site Adr. 7576 IMMOKALEE RD
State FL Zip 34LL6-74LL
S€ction
28
Township
48
Acres *Estimated
3.85
Range
26
Legal 28 4A 26 WLl2 OF NW1/4 OF NEl/4 OF NWl/4, LESS N 150FT
Latest Sales History
(Not all Sale5 are listed due to Contidentiality)
Date Book-Page Amount
oSlLsloo 26sL-2615 $ 0
osl26l98 2423-2260 $ 147,400
LLl0Ll89 L487-2299 $ 91,500
LL|OL|T6 657-1659 $ 0
Millaoe Area O 36
Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER
Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICUTTURAL
Millaoe Rates O *Calculations
School Other Total
5.245 5.258 11.503
2015 Certified Tax Roll
(Sub,iect to Change)
Land Value $ 386,000
(+) Improved value $0
(=) Market Value $ 385,000
(-) 10% Cap $ r74,O7L
(=) Assessed Value $ 211,929
(=) School Taxable Value i 386,qD
(=) Taxablevalue S 211,929
If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was .reated after the Final Tax Roll
PDF Page 37 of 194
Collier County Property Appraiser
Property Summary
Parcel No. 00194920009
Name / Address
Site Adr.
ROYAL PALM NURSERY
3120 60TH ST SW
State FL Zip 34LL6-74LL
Acres *EstimatedMap No.
3828
Section
28
Township
48
Range
26
Strap No.
000100 004 3828 5
Latest Sales History
(Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)
Date Book-Page Amount
08109/96 22L6-2s2 $ 50,000
08/0L/84 1097-2181 $ 0
09/0L/60 70s-s04 $ 0
Legal 28 48 26WLl2 OF SWI/4 OF NE1/4 Of Nwl/4 5 AC
Millaoe Area O 35
Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEAOER
UseCodeO 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL
Millaoe Rates O *Calculations
School Other Total
5.245 6.258 11.503
2015 Certified Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Land Value $ 50O,OOO
(+) Improved Value $ 0
(=) Market Value $ 500,OOO
(-) LOYoCap S 250,437
(=) Assessed Value S 249,563
(=) School Taxable Value $ 500,(x)0
(=) Taxable Value g 249,563
If all Values shown above equal 0 thas par.el was created after the Final Tax Roll
City NAPLES
PDF Page 38 of 194
:
i
E
I
TAPLEGEND
FLc.l.
,.rl.lr ,01C i l.dt U.trtl
t ddr z)1a B h.t,
Colli.( Co,rnly
ultiple Property Records selected
ior lhs data herein, ils use, or its interpretalion.
I
ES.,t
b"n
:--i-
,a'tYr
t
i
E
-
I
E
,
I
,*ffi
-ryt r!
,l
1.,''t
.,| |
.l
t:
'*
H I
E
PDF Page 39 of 194
ii)
'E.
oN
I
a
lt
I I
-
,t..I a
?
.:
of.L
I
!
-'1-'--r
rr
E
,l
>
{
!
1
't
Go
aII
N
o
lt
!
I
I
E
\.T
E
iitrii
a
Gl-tI
I
t
I
t
iF
i;
.E
oN
I
-
'I
*
b
a
-Ital
PDF Page 40 of 194
PDF Page 41 of 194
PDF Page 42 of 194
PDF Page 43 of 194
PDF Page 44 of 194
PDF Page 45 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
ADD RESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division
at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by
Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing.
Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section.
PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
BL (Blasting Permit)
BD (Boat Dock Extension)
Carnival/Circus Permit
CU (Conditional Use)
EXP (Excavation Permit)
FP (Final Plat
LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
PNC (Project Name Change)
PPL (Plans & Plat Review)
PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
PUD Rezone
RZ (Standard Rezone)
SDP (Site Development Plan)
SDPA (SDP Amendment)
SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP)
SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP)
SNR (Street Name Change)
SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted)
TDR (T ransfer of Development Rights)
VA (Variance)
VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached)
FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1
LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-
of-way
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
SDP - or AR or PL #
SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties)
CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
PDF Page 46 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up
Applicant Name:
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name
approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Approved by: Date:
Updated by: Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2
Fax
Email/Fax:Phone:
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
PDF Page 47 of 194
$ 0
$ 147,400
$ 91,500
$ 0
$ 386,000
$ 0
$ 386,000
$ 174,071
$ 211,929
$ 386,000
$ 211,929
Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary
Parcel No.00195080003 Site Adr.7576 IMMOKALEE RD
Name / Address CLEARY JR, RAYMOND J
THOMAS J CLEARY TR
THOMAS J CLEARY FAMILY TRUST
UTD 2-17-00
3120 60TH ST SW
City NAPLES State FL Zip 34116-7411
Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated
3B28 000100 007 3B28 28 48 26 3.86
Legal 28 48 26 W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4, LESS N 150FT
Millage Area 36 Millage Rates *Calculations
Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total
Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503
Latest Sales History
(Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)
Date Book-Page Amount
03/15/00 2651-2615
05/26/98 2423-2260
11/01/89 1487-2299
11/01/76 667-1659
2015 Certified Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Land Value
(+) Improved Value
(=) Market Value
(-) 10% Cap
(=) Assessed Value
(=) School Taxable Value
(=) Taxable Value
If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll
Page 1 of 1
8/10/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00195080003
PDF Page 48 of 194
$ 60,000
$ 0
$ 0
$ 500,000
$ 0
$ 500,000
$ 250,437
$ 249,563
$ 500,000
$ 249,563
Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary
Parcel No.00194920009 Site Adr.
Name / Address ROYAL PALM NURSERY
3120 60TH ST SW
City NAPLES State FL Zip 34116-7411
Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated
3B28 000100 004 3B28 28 48 26 5
Legal 28 48 26 W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 5 AC
Millage Area 36 Millage Rates *Calculations
Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total
Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503
Latest Sales History
(Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)
Date Book-Page Amount
08/09/96 2216-252
08/01/84 1097-2181
09/01/60 705-504
2015 Certified Tax Roll
(Subject to Change)
Land Value
(+) Improved Value
(=) Market Value
(-) 10% Cap
(=) Assessed Value
(=) School Taxable Value
(=) Taxable Value
If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll
Page 1 of 1
8/10/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00194920009
PDF Page 49 of 194
Multiple Property Records selected. 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Page 1 of 1Print Map8/10/2016http://maps.collierappraiser.com/webmap/mapprint.aspx?title=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=419671.86458...PDF Page 50 of 194
PDF Page 51 of 194
PDF Page 52 of 194
PDF Page 53 of 194
PDF Page 54 of 194
PDF Page 55 of 194
PDF Page 56 of 194
PDF Page 57 of 194
PDF Page 58 of 194
PDF Page 59 of 194
PDF Page 60 of 194
PDF Page 61 of 194
PDF Page 62 of 194
PDF Page 63 of 194
PDF Page 64 of 194
PDF Page 65 of 194
PDF Page 66 of 194
PDF Page 67 of 194
PDF Page 68 of 194
PDF Page 69 of 194
PDF Page 70 of 194
PDF Page 71 of 194
PDF Page 72 of 194
PDF Page 73 of 194
NOTES:CLEARY PARCELLYING INCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDABOUNDARY SURVEY w/ IMPROVEMENTSDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:JOB CODE:SCALE:DATE:FILE:SHEET:22 SEPTEMBER 20161" = 40'DLSARC16-128-BSI (DIGITAL).DWG1 of 1GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLEGENDREVISION: REVISED FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURE (9/26/16)REVISION: ADDED ACREAGE (10/12/16)PDF Page 74 of 194
0200'100'SCALE: 1" = 200'GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380IMMOKALEE ROADSATURNIA LAKES BLVDLOGAN BLVD.SUBJECTPROPERTYPDF Page 75 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________
E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________
Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________
City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________
Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
Check applicable system:
a. County Utility System
b. City Utility System
c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________
d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________
e. Septic System
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
Check applicable system:
a. County Utility System
b. City Utility System
c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________
d. Private System (Well)
Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________
Peak and Average Daily Demands:
A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________
B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________
If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date
service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________
4/15/2015 Page 8 of 16
PDF Page 76 of 194
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of
sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of
affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil
involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries
of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to
dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier
County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in
accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also
include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be
paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If
applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements
for serving the water and sewer systems.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for
at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any
provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to
serve the project shall be provided.
4/15/2015 Page 9 of 16
PDF Page 77 of 194
Cleary PUD
Exhibit A
Peak and Average Daily Demands
October 25, 2016 Page 1 of 1
Group Housing (200 units)
Water: ADF = 200 units x 1.1 persons/unit x 150 gpd/person x 1.2 (peak season multiplier) =
39,600 gpd
MDF = 1.3 x ADF = 51,480 gpd
Wastewater: ADF = 200 units x 1.1 persons/unit x 100 gpd/person x 1.2 (peak season multiplier)
= 26,400 gpd
MDF = 1.3 x ADF = 34,320 gpd
Residential (65 units)
Water: ADF = 65 units x 2.1 persons/unit x 150 gpd/person x 1.2 (peak season multiplier) =
24,570 gpd
MDF = 1.3 x ADF = 31,941 gpd
Wastewater: ADF = 65 units x 2.1 persons/unit x 100 gpd/person x 1.2 (peak season multiplier)
= 16,380 gpd
MDF = 1.3 x ADF = 21,294 gpd
PDF Page 78 of 194
PDF Page 79 of 194
CLEARY – IMMOKALEE PROPERTY
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT &
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY REPORT
August 2016
Revised January 2017
Revised June 2017
Prepared For:
Q. Grady Minor and Associates
c/o: Sharon Umpenhour
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Phone: (239) 947-1144
Email: SUmpenhour@gradyminor.com
Prepared By:
BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Inc.
1599 Covington Circle East Fort Myers Florida 33919
Phone: (239) 340-0678
Email: BearPaws.Env.Consulting@GMail.com
PDF Page 80 of 194
Introduction
An environmental assessment and protected species survey was conducted by BearPaws Environmental
Consulting (please refer to Exhibit G – Barrett Stejskal’s Resume) on the Cleary – Immokalee Property on
August 15, 2016. The 8.98± acre site is located in Section 28, Township 48S, and Range 26E, of Collier
County, Florida. More specifically; the site is located approximately a quarter mile east of Logan Boulevard
and immediately south of Immokalee Road, in Naples, Florida. Please see the attached Project Location
Map (Exhibit A).
The purpose of this assessment was to identify all natural/native areas, such as wetlands and unique upland
areas on-site per Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Section 3.05.00, Vegetation Removal,
Protection, and Preservation. The site was also inspected to determine the potential of listed (endangered,
threatened, etc.) species inhabiting the site per the Collier County LDC, Section 3.04.00, the Protection of
Endangered, Threatened, or Listed Species, as well as any Listed Plant Species, as identified in Collier
County LDC, Section 3.04.03. Protection afforded to these listed plants is designed to provide limited
relocation of seed or individual plants if they do not already occur naturally in the proposed preserve area.
Specific attention was towards locating any potential gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows
within the uplands, any potential Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) day-beds in the wetlands, and
any bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nests, red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and/or
Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) cavity trees within the upland communities on-site.
The project’s surrounding land uses are a mixture of residential homes, commercial developments,
undeveloped vacant land, and forested land. The survey was conducted in the mid-morning to early
afternoon; the temperatures were in the upper 80’s, with a light breeze, and partly cloudy skies.
Methodology
The survey method consisted of overlapping belt transects performed for all vegetation communities on-
site in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 3.08.00, Environmental Data
Requirements. This survey is comprised of a several step process. This survey is comprised of a several
step process. First, vegetation communities or land-uses on the study area are delineated using the Florida
Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Next, the FLUCFCS codes are cross-
referenced with the Protected Species List. This protected species list names the species which have a
probability of occurring in any particular FLUCFCS community.
An intensive pedestrian survey is conducted using parallel belt transects that are approximately 10-40 feet
apart, depending upon both the thickness of vegetation and visibility, as a means of searching for plants and
animals. In addition, periodic “stop-look-listen” and quiet stalking methods are conducted for animals.
Signs or sightings of these species are then recorded and are marked in the field with flagging tape. The
table at end of the report lists the FLUCFCS communities found on the parcel and the corresponding species
which have a probability of occurring in them.
Existing Site Conditions
Boundary – For the purposes of this survey, the project boundary was obtained from Grady Minor and is
assumed to be approximately 8.98± acres.
PDF Page 81 of 194
Soils - The soils on the property have been mapped by the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS,
formerly the Soil Conservation Service). These mappings are general in nature, but can provide a certain
level of information about the site as to the possible extent of wetland area. The agencies commonly use
these mappings as justification for certain wetland/upland determinations. According to these mappings,
the parcel is underlain by Basinger fine sand (NRCS #17; hydric) and Holopaw and Okeelanta soils;
depressional (NRCS #23; hydric). Both Basinger fine sand and Holopaw and Okeelanta soils are considered
hydric on both the local and national levels. Please see the attached NRCS Soils Map (Exhibit D).
Vegetation Descriptions – Vegetation is one parameter used in determining the presence of uplands or
wetlands; these community mappings will generally reflect what a specific area could be considered by the
regulatory agencies. We identified approximately 1.05± acres of wetland communities on-site during the
site assessment. While on-site, generalized community delineations are hand-drawn on an aerial defining
the different vegetation associations on-site. These general delineations were based on the nomenclature of
the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Level III and IV (FDOT 1999).
Please see the attached FLUCFCS Map with Aerial (Exhibit B) and FLUCFCS Map without Aerial (Exhibit
C). Listed below are the vegetation communities and land-uses identified on the site.
FLUCFCS Codes & Community Descriptions
Uplands
The following community areas have been designated as upland habitats. Uplands are any area
that does not qualify as a wetland because the associated hydrologic regime is not sufficiently wet
enough to elicit development of vegetation, soils, and/or hydrologic characteristics associated with
wetlands.
FLUCFCS 624D E2 Cypress, Pine, & Cabbage Palm – Drained (Exotics 25-49%) - 2.65± Ac.
This upland community type occupies approximately 2.65± acres of the property. This community could
have historically been a wetland, however, due to the surrounding development and roadways, the property
has been drained and the wetland characteristics have been depleted from this portion of the site. Exotic
species such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius),
occupy approximately 25-49% of this community. The canopy consists of slash pine (Pinus elliottii),
cypress (Taxodium distichum), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel
oak (Quercus laurifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and java plum (Syzygium cumini). The
sub-canopy contains cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), buckthorn
(Sideroxylon celastrinum), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and myrsine (Rapanea guinensis). The ground
cover includes saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), caesar weed (Urena
lobata), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), hairy beggar-ticks (Bidens alba), royal fern (Osmunda
regalis), creeping ox-eye (Sphagneticola trilobata), pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida), broom sedge
(Andropogon virginicus), chocolate weed (Melochia corchorifolia), and other various opportunistic weedy
species. Commonly observed vines include grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered uplands by
the regulatory agencies.
FLUCFCS 624D E3 Cypress, Pine, & Cabbage Palm – Drained (Exotics 50-74%) – 3.93± Ac.
This upland community type occupies approximately 3.93± acres of the property. Much like the community
above, this community could have historically been a wetland, however, due to the surrounding
development and roadways, the property has been drained and the wetland characteristics have been
depleted from this portion of the site. Exotic species such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and
Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), occupy approximately 50-74% of this community. The canopy
PDF Page 82 of 194
consists of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cypress (Taxodium distichum), melaleuca (Melaleuca
quinquenervia), live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), earleaf acacia (Acacia
auriculiformis), and java plum (Syzygium cumini). The sub-canopy contains cabbage palm (Sabal
palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), buckthorn (Sideroxylon celastrinum), wax myrtle
(Myrica cerifera), and myrsine (Rapanea guinensis). The ground cover includes saw palmetto (Serenoa
repens), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), caesar weed (Urena lobata), swamp fern (Blechnum
serrulatum), hairy beggar-ticks (Bidens alba), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), creeping ox-eye
(Sphagneticola trilobata), pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida), broom sedge (Andropogon virginicus),
chocolate weed (Melochia corchorifolia), and other various opportunistic weedy species. Commonly
observed vines include grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and
poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered uplands by the regulatory
agencies.
FLUCFCS 624D E4 Cypress, Pine, & Cabbage Palm – Drained (Exotics > 75%) - 0.74± Ac.
This upland community type occupies approximately 0.74± acres of the property and is located along the
eastern and south-eastern property boundary. The canopy is mostly open with scattered melaleuca
(Melaleuca quinquenervia). The sub-canopy is dominated with Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius).
The groundcover is mostly open with various opportunistic weedy species. Commonly observed vines
include greenbriar (Smilax sp.), grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered uplands by
the regulatory agencies.
FLUCFCS 740/814 Disturbed Trail - 0.61± Ac.
This upland community type occupies approximately 0.61± acres of the property. The canopy and sub-
canopy is mostly open with scattered slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and
Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), along the edges. The ground cover includes bahia grass
(Paspalum notatum), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), caesar weed
(Urena lobata), hairy beggar-ticks (Bidens alba), sandspur (Cenchrus echinatus), and other various
opportunistic weedy species. Commonly observed vines include grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar
(Smilax spp.), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community would be considered uplands by
the regulatory agencies.
Wetlands
The following community areas have been designated as wetland habitats. Wetlands are any areas
that under normal circumstances have hydro-phytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland
hydrology.
FLUCFCS 624 E3 Cypress, Pine, & Cabbage Palm (Exotics 50-74%) – 0.55± Acres
The wetland community occupies approximately 0.55± acres of the property. Exotic species such as
melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), occupy
approximately 50-74% of this community. The canopy contains cypress (Taxodium distichum), slash pine
(Pinus elliottii), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia). The sub-canopy
includes melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), cabbage palm
(Sabal palmetto), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and myrsine (Rapanea punctata). The groundcover
contains swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus), beakrush (Cyperus
sp.), yellow-eyed grass (Xyris floridana), and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense). Commonly observed vines
include grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), greenbriar (Smilax
spp.) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). This community does contain some transitional wetland
vegetation, advantageous rooting, water line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this
community that would be classified as wetlands. This community would be considered wetlands by the
regulatory agencies.
PDF Page 83 of 194
FLUCFCS 624 E4 Cypress, Pine, & Cabbage Palm (Exotics > 75%) Wetlands – 0.50± Acres
The wetland community occupies approximately 0.31± acres of the property. The dominant canopy and
sub-canopy species is melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) with widely scattered cypress (Taxodium
distichum). The sub-canopy contains melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthifolius) with scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and myrsine (Rapanea guinensis). The
groundcover is mostly open with scattered swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum). Commonly observed vines
include greenbriar (Smilax sp.), peppervine (Ampelopsis arborea), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans). This community does contain some transitional wetland vegetation, advantageous rooting, water
line staining, and algal matting, as well as other signs in this community that would be classified as
wetlands. This community would be considered wetlands by the regulatory agencies.
Table 1. FLUCFCS Community Table
Native Vegetation Preserve Summary
The Cleary – Immokalee project site is comprised of 7.13± acres of native vegetation as defined by Collier
County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.05.07. The majority of the native habitats contain 25-75
percent coverage of exotic vegetation. The areas excluded from the native vegetation calculations consist
of vegetative communities with exotic coverage of greater than seventy-five percent (75%) coverage
(FLUCFCS 624D E4 and 624 E4) and disturbed land/trail (FLUCFCS Codes 740/814) comprised mostly
of non-native and weedy plant species. Table 2 below provides a summary of the project’s native vegetation
habitats and acreages.
Table 2. Native Vegetation Habitat Types and Acreages
Exotic species such as melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthifolius) dominate the E4 communities with greater than seventy-five percent coverage. These
communities consists of FLUCFCS Code 624D E4 0.74± acres), FLUCFCS Code 624 E4 (0.50± acres),
FLUCFCS
Code Community Description Classification Acres
624D E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics 25-49%) Upland 2.65± Ac.
624D E3 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics 50-74%) Upland 3.93± Ac.
624D E4 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics > 75%) Upland 0.74± Ac
624 E3 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (Exotics 50-74%) Wetland 0.55± Ac.
624 E4 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (Exotics > 75%) Wetland 0.50± Ac.
740/814 Disturbed Trail Upland 0.61± Ac.
Total 8.98± Ac.
FLUCFCS
Code Community Description Native
Vegetation
Non-Native
Vegetation
Total
Acreage
624D E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics 25-49%) 2.65± Ac. -- 2.65± Ac.
624D E3 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics 50-74%) 3.93± Ac. -- 2.63± Ac.
624D E4 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm, Drained (Exotics > 75%) -- 0.74± Ac. 2.04± Ac
624 E3 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (Exotics 50-74%) 0.55± Ac. -- 0.55± Ac.
624 E4 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (Exotics > 75%) -- 0.50± Ac. 0.50± Ac.
740/814 Disturbed Trail -- 0.61± Ac. 0.61± Ac.
Total 7.13± Ac. 1.85± Ac. 8.98± Ac.
Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement
(Native Vegetation Acreage x 15%) 1.07± Acres
PDF Page 84 of 194
and FLUCFCS Code 740/814 (0.61± acres); these areas are included as non-native vegetation on Table 2
above. The disturbed land/trail along the western property boundary is result of the road right of way
easement; these disturbed land/trail areas and communities with exotic coverage greater than seventy-five
percent coverage, totals 1.85± acres. The project has proposed to retain approximately 1.09± acres of
preserve area; therefore, the requirements of native vegetation preserve standards, according to Section
3.05.07, have been met. Please refer to Exhibit F, the Native/Non-Native Vegetation Map for the exact
locations of each of these communities.
Protected Species Results
There were no protected species or signs thereof observed on-site during the protected species survey. There
were a few small stick-nests observed in some of the melaleuca trees; however, they were believed to be
that of a bird nest or perhaps a nest of one of the grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) observed on-site. The
nests were not large enough to be utilized by a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) for nesting purposes
or a Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) as a day-bed. There were no other nest-like
structures or tree cavities noted, and there were no gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows
identified. We observed burrows belonging to armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus), which were not marked
in the field; there was no evidence that these burrows were being used by gopher tortoises. We did not
observe any cavity trees that could potentially be utilized by the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis) and/or Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus).
There were several other non-listed species identified while conducting the protected species survey, among
those were several grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus),
mourning doves (Zenaida macroura), pine warblers (Setophaga pinus), and northern mockingbirds (Mimus
polyglottos). The various listed species that may occur in the FLUCFCS communities on-site have been
tabulated on the attached table below.
Discussion
Due to the surrounding land uses, and the busy roads/highways, it is unlikely that this site supports or would
provide habitat for any other pro tected species. Generalized community locations were estimated and hand-
drawn on a non-rectified aerial with approximate habitat boundaries, hence their location and aerial extent
is approximate. Before any detailed site planning, it is recommended that the wetland lines be flagged and
approved by the regulatory agencies and that professional land surveyors survey the wetland lines.
The determination of ecological system classifications, functions, values, and boundaries, is not an exact
science; therefore, different individuals and/or agencies may reach different conclusions. It is not possible
for BearPaws Environmental Consultants, Inc. to guarantee the outcome of such determinations. Therefore,
the conclusions of this report are based upon our profession expertise and opinions and would require a full
review by the appropriate regulatory agencies.
PDF Page 85 of 194
Table 3: Listed Species by Habitat with Current Status FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Description Common Name Scientific Name Percent Coverage Observed USDA FDA&CS FWS FWC 624 Pine – Cypress – Cabbage Palm Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus 90 -- -- -- SAT T Limpkin Aramus guarauna 90 -- -- -- -- SSC Little blue heron Egretta caerulea 90 -- -- -- -- SSC Snowy egret Egretta thula 90 -- -- -- -- SSC Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor 90 -- -- -- -- SSC 740/814 Disturbed Trail Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus 90 -- -- -- T T C = Commercially Exploited, SAT = Similarity of Appearance Threatened, SSC = Species of Special Concern, T = Threatened, E = Endangered Table designates listed species with potential to occur in each FLUCFCS community as listed in Appendix H of the Lee County Land Development Code. PDF Page 86 of 194
EXHIBIT A
Project Location Map
PDF Page 87 of 194
+Ä.QICP$NXF+OOQMCNGG4F
%QNNKGT$NXF+Ä7554%QNNKGT
%QWPV[.QICP$NXF54St Augustine
JacksonvilleLake city
Gainesville
Daytona Beach
Cape Canaveral
Ft Pierce
West Palm
Beach
Ft Lauderdale
Miami
Naples
Ft myers
Port Charlotte
Key West
Bradenton
Sarasota
Okeechobee
Lakeland
Orlando
Deland
Ocala
Tallahassee
Panama City
Pensacola
241,'%6.1%#6+10
5VCVGQH(NQTKFC
%QNNKGT
065
.QECVKQP
5'
$95
&TCYP$[ %CVGIQT[
,QD0WODGT 5ECNG
%QWPV[564
&CVG 2CIG
'ZJKDKV
Cleary - Immokalee Property
Location Map
9CNFGP&TKXG(QTV/[GTU(.
ÄDGCTRCYUGPXEQPUWNVKPI"IOCKNEQO
0
PDF Page 88 of 194
EXHIBIT B
FLUCFCS Map with Aerial
PDF Page 89 of 194
624E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;ϭ͘ϯϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;Ϯ͘ϲϯĐ͘цͿ
624D E2
;Ϯ͘ϲϱĐ͘цͿ
624 E3
;Ϭ͘ϱϱĐ͘цͿ
740/814
;Ϭ͘ϲϭĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϰĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϮϬĐ͘цͿ
NOTES:
FLUCFCS lines estimated from
1"=200' aerial photographs and
locations approximated.
FLUCFCS per Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification
System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999).
Aerial photographs were acquired
through Collier County Property
Appraiser's office with a flight
date of January, 2016.
BWS 6/19/17
--
28/48S/26E
FLUCFCS
1" = 200'
Collier
Cleary - Immokalee Property
Aerial FLUCFCS Map
Drawn By:Category
Job Number Scale:
CountyS/T/R
Date:Page
Exhibit
1327 Walden Drive, Fort Myers, FL. 33901
N
Scale:1"=200'
(239) 340-0678 bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com
-
-
Legend
Wetlands
;ϭ͘ϬϱцĐͿ
PDF Page 90 of 194
EXHIBIT C
FLUCFCS Map
PDF Page 91 of 194
624E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;ϭ͘ϯϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;Ϯ͘ϲϯĐ͘цͿ
624D E2
;Ϯ͘ϲϱĐ͘цͿ
624 E3
;Ϭ͘ϱϱĐ͘цͿ
740/814
;Ϭ͘ϲϭĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϰĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϮϬĐ͘цͿ
BWS 6/19/17
--
28/48S/26E
FLUCFCS
1" = 200'
Collier
Cleary - Immokalee Property
FLUCFCS Map
NOTES:
FLUCFCS lines estimated from
1"=200' aerial photographs and
locations approximated.
FLUCFCS per Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification
System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999).
Drawn By:Category
Job Number Scale:
CountyS/T/R
Date:Page
Exhibit
1327 Walden Drive, Fort Myers, FL. 33901
N
Scale:1"=200'
-
-
(239) 340-0678 bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com
Legend
Wetlands
;ϭ͘ϬϱцĐͿ
PDF Page 92 of 194
EXHIBIT D
NRCS Soils Map
PDF Page 93 of 194
23
17
NOTES:
Soils were acquired from the
FGDL and are from the NRCS
Soils Maps.
BWS 6/19/17
--
28/48S/26E
Soils Map
1" = 200'
Collier
Cleary - Immokalee Property
Drawn By:Category
Job Number Scale:
CountyS/T/R
Date:Page
Exhibit
1327 Walden Drive, Fort Myers, FL. 33901
N
Scale:1"=200'
(239) 340-0678 bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com
-
-
Soils
PDF Page 94 of 194
EXHIBIT E
Protected Species Survey Map
PDF Page 95 of 194
624E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;ϭ͘ϯϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
;Ϯ͘ϲϯĐ͘цͿ
624D E2
;Ϯ͘ϲϱĐ͘цͿ
624 E3
;Ϭ͘ϱϱĐ͘цͿ
740/814
;Ϭ͘ϲϭĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϱϰĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
;Ϭ͘ϮϬĐ͘цͿ
NOTES:
FLUCFCS lines estimated from
1"=200' aerial photographs and
locations approximated.
FLUCFCS per Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification
System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999).
Aerial photographs were acquired
through Collier County Property
Appraiser's office with a flight
date of January, 2016.
BWS 6/19/17
--
28/48S/26E
PSS
1" = 200'
Collier
Cleary - Immokalee Property
Aerial PSS Map
Drawn By:Category
Job Number Scale:
CountyS/T/R
Date:Page
Exhibit
1327 Walden Drive, Fort Myers, FL. 33901
N
Scale:1"=200'
(239) 340-0678 bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com
-
-
Protected Species Survey
Transects
Legend
Wetlands
;ϭ͘ϬϱцĐͿ
PDF Page 96 of 194
EXHIBIT F
Native-Non-Native Vegetation Map
PDF Page 97 of 194
740/814
Non-Native
;Ϭ͘ϲϭĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
Native
;Ϯ͘ϲϯĐ͘цͿ
624E4
Non-Native
;Ϭ͘ϱϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E2
Native
;Ϯ͘ϲϱĐ͘цͿ
624 E3
Native
;Ϭ͘ϱϱĐ͘цͿ
624D E3
Native
;ϭ͘ϯϬĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
Non-Native
;Ϭ͘ϱϰĐ͘цͿ
624D E4
Non-Native
;Ϭ͘ϮϬĐ͘цͿ
NOTES:
FLUCFCS lines estimated from
1"=200' aerial photographs and
locations approximated.
FLUCFCS per Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification
System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999).
Aerial photographs were acquired
through Collier County Property
Appraiser's office with a flight
date of January, 2016.
BWS 6/19/17
--
28/48S/26E
FLUCFCS
1" = 200'
Collier
Cleary - Immokalee Property
Native/Non-Native Vegetation Map
Drawn By:Category
Job Number Scale:
CountyS/T/R
Date:Page
Exhibit
1327 Walden Drive, Fort Myers, FL. 33901
N
Scale:1"=200'
(239) 340-0678 bearpaws.env.consulting@gmail.com
-
-
Legend
Native Vegetation
;ϳ͘ϭϯцĐͿ
Non-Native Vegetation
;ϭ͘ϴϱцĐͿ
PDF Page 98 of 194
EXHIBIT G
Barrett Stejskal’s Resume
PDF Page 99 of 194
CURRENT RESPONSIBILITIES
As co‐president of BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Inc., Mr.
Stejskal is responsible for all management duties of the firm and
project coordination. The clients Mr. Stejskal works with include
both the private and public sectors.
Besides the corporate responsibilities, also as a consultant and
ecologist, Mr. Stejskal is responsible for coordination of
environmental permitting, conducting wildlife surveys, wetland
delineations, and other environmental reports. He also has been
qualified as an expert in wetland and wildlife ecology and
environmental land use in Lee County. Mr. Stejskal has received his
certification as an Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Since 2003, Mr. Stejskal has managed projects and conducted
fieldwork and produced reports and applications for land use
planning and development. These projects include due diligence
assessments for land acquisition purposes, assistance with
environmental land planning, coordination on permitting and
mitigation design for wetlands and wildlife, and compliance
monitoring of projects during and after construction. Mr. Stejskal
has received certification from Environmental Systems Research
Institute (ESRI) in ARC GIS I & II as well as additional training on
gopher tortoise permitting and relocations from the Ashton
Biodiversity Institute.
PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE
o Ajax US 17: Audubon’s Crested Caracara nest survey and
observation for Ajax and the Florida Department of
Transportation in Glades County.
o Ajax State Road 29: Audubon’s Crested Caracara, Sandhill
Crane, Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nest survey for the Florida
Department of Transportation in Glades County.
o Arlington Commerce Park: Wetland and ecological permitting
for a mixed use development with red‐cockaded woodpecker
permitting in Lee County.
o Colonial/Ortiz: Wetland, ecological, and wildlife permitting for
the red‐cockaded woodpecker for a medical office development
along with wetland monitoring in Lee County.
o Cook‐Brown Mine: Impact assessment, environmental and
wetland permitting for a mine expansion in Charlotte County.
o Sonoma: Wetland impact and mitigation design for a
commercial mixed use golf course community with gopher
tortoise and scrub jay permitting in DeSoto County.
o North Fort Myers Restoration: Permitting and construction
coordination for a hydrological and ecological restoration
project in Lee County.
o Panther Mine Expansion: Impact assessment, environmental
and wetland permitting for a mine expansion in Charlotte
County.
Barrett Stejskal
Co‐President, Consultant, & Ecologist
Experience:
o 15+ Years of Environmental Experience
Education:
o Florida Gulf Coast University, BA, 2003
Environmental Studies & Biology
Professional Affiliations:
o Southwest Florida Association of
Environmental Professionals
o Lee County Conservation Land Acquisition and
Stewardship Advisory Committee
Certification:
o FWC – Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent
Permit #: GTA‐09‐00020D
o Environmental Systems Research Institute
(ESRI) – ARC GIS I & II
Areas of Expertise:
o Ecological Sciences
o Audubon’s Crested Caracara Monitoring &
Observations
o Gopher Tortoise Surveys, Relocations, &
Excavations
o Sandhill Crane Nest Surveys & Species Monitoring
o Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Utilizing ACAD,
GIS & GPS
o Wetland Permitting and Mitigation
o Corps and State Wetland Delineations
o Impact Assessments
o Wildlife Surveys and Species Relocations
o Wildlife Habitat Management Planning and
Permitting
o Habitat Restoration and Mitigation Design
o Environmental Land Use Permitting and Rezoning
o Local, State, and Federal Environmental Permitting
o Post Permit Compliance and Monitoring
Contact Information:
Barrett Stejskal
Co‐President, Consultant, & Ecologist
BearPaws Environmental Consulting, Inc.
1599 Covington Circle East Fort Myers Florida 33919
Phone: (239) 340‐0678
Email: bearpawsenvconsulting@gmail.com
barrett@bearpawsenvconsulting.com
Website: http://www.bearpawsenvconsulting.com
PDF Page 100 of 194
PDF Page 101 of 194
PDF Page 102 of 194
PDF Page 103 of 194
PDF Page 104 of 194
PDF Page 105 of 194
PDF Page 106 of 194
PDF Page 107 of 194
PDF Page 108 of 194
PDF Page 109 of 194
PDF Page 110 of 194
PDF Page 111 of 194
PDF Page 112 of 194
PDF Page 113 of 194
PDF Page 114 of 194
PDF Page 115 of 194
PDF Page 116 of 194
PDF Page 117 of 194
PDF Page 118 of 194
PDF Page 119 of 194
PDF Page 120 of 194
PDF Page 121 of 194
PDF Page 122 of 194
PDF Page 123 of 194
PDF Page 124 of 194
Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08
1
COLLIER COUNTY
WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT
DATE SUBMITTED: _______________ PLANNER:
PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: _____________________
(To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff)
PROJECT NAME: Cleary RPUD (PL201600019850
LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the south side of
Immokalee Road west of Saturnia Lakes Boulevard
________________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The proposed Cleary RPUD property is
approximately 9± acres, which is undeveloped. The Archaeological Probability Map #4,
shows the project is not located in an area that indicates areas of Historical/Archaeological
probability. The project is located in Section 28, Township 48 S, Range 26 E.
(Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a
low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development
& Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the
requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver
application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working
days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for
historical/archaeological sites.)
PDF Page 125 of 194
Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08
2
SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA
A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option
holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Raymond J. Cleary Jr.
Mailing Address: 3120 60th Street SW
Phone: (407) 803-4670 FAX: _______________________
E-Mail: royalpalmlawn@aol.com
B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP
Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita
Springs, Florida 34134
Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375
E-Mail: warnold@gradyminor.com
C. Name of owner(s) of property: Raymond J. Cleary Jr. and Thomas J. Cleary, TR
Mailing Address: 3120 60th Street SW
Phone: (407) 803-4670 FAX: _______________________
E-Mail: royalpalmlawn@aol.com
Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized
letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached.
SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page
(obtainable from Clerk’s Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.)
A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable.
1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County.
Subdivision Name:
Plat Book Page Unit Tract Lot
Section 18 Township 49S Range 26 E
2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached
which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or
aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township
PDF Page 126 of 194
Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08
3
and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal
description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not
describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made
on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has
the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to
locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be
submitted.
B. Property dimensions:
Area: __________________ square feet, or 9± acres
Width along roadway: 330± feet (Immokalee Road)
Depth: 1186± feet
C. Present use of property: Undeveloped
D. Present zoning classification: A, Agricultural
SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA
Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or
historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be
evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has
been excavated.
A. Waiver Request Justification.
1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property is undeveloped.
2. Historical Land Use Description: undeveloped.
3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site contains
vegetation.
4. Other: .
B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the
waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by
an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the
cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of
the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to
the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice
shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a
decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal
PDF Page 127 of 194
Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08
4
to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation
Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County
Commissioners.
SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION
A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this
application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal
of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record
and shall be a permanent part of the file.
C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently
fold to fit into a legal size (8 ½” x 14”) folder.
______________________________
Signature of Applicant or Agent
D. Wayne Arnold, AICP
Printed Name of Applicant or Agent
=====================================================================
-TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION-
SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION
The County Manager or designee has made the following determination:
Approved on: _____________ By:______________________________
Approved with Conditions on: ____________ By: _____________________________
(see attached)
Denied on: _______________ By: ______________________________
(see attached)
PDF Page 128 of 194
Cleary PUD
Exhibit 1
Legal Description
October 14, 2016 Page 1 of 1
PARCEL 1
(OR 2651, PG 2615)
THE WEST HALF (W 1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE
1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PARCEL 2
(OR 2216, PG 252)
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF COLLIER AND STATE OF FLORIDA
PARCELS 1 & 2 CONTAINING 8.99 ACRES MORE OR LESS COMBINED
PDF Page 129 of 194
0200'100'SCALE: 1" = 200'GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380IMMOKALEE ROADSATURNIA LAKES BLVDLOGAN BLVD.SUBJECTPROPERTYPDF Page 130 of 194
Collier County School District
School Impact Analysis Application
Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new
residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of
the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all
applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional
documentation/information may be requested during the review process.
For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management
Department at 239-377-0267.
Please check [¥] type of application request (one only):
[ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter
[ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment
For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3,
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. Project Information:
Project Name: ___________________________________________ Municipality: _________________________________
Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________
Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map)
Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________
II. Ownership/Agent Information:
Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________
Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________
(Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person)
Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________
I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted
herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
_____________________________________________________ _____________________________
Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date
_________________________________________________________________________________________
III. Development Information
Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application)
Current Land Use Designation: Proposed Land Use Designation:
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Project Acreage:
Unit Type: SF MF MH C G
Total Units Currently Allowed by Type:
Total Units Proposed by Type:
Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application.
Date/time stamp:___________________________
Cleary RPUD Collier County
00194920009 and 00195080003
South side of Immokalee Road west of Saturnia Lakes Boulevard
Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard
Raymond J Cleary Jr
D. Wayne Arnold,
Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134
239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com
October 20, 2016
Undeveloped Residential
A, Agricultural RPUD
20
65 65
✔
PDF Page 131 of 194
Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrand TotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = GovernmentEXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MH N/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total 150.2PDF Page 132 of 194
Types of Reviews:
School Impact Analysis:
This review should be divided into two categories:
-School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and;
-Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions).
School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a
review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may
be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to
mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation.
Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether
there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination
Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a
project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation
period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is
expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have
an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant
upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no
impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request.
Exemption Letter:
An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects
that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools.
Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record;
amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or
change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or
residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are
authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005.
Concurrency Determination Amendment:
An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an
application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency
determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a
negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being
modified and reissued.
3
PDF Page 133 of 194
0200'100'SCALE: 1" = 200'GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380IMMOKALEE ROADSATURNIA LAKES BLVDLOGAN BLVD.SUBJECTPROPERTYPDF Page 134 of 194
Cleary PUD
Deviation Justification
March 10, 2017 Page 1 of 1
Deviation 1:
Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 which establishes a maximum FAR of 0.45 for
group housing to permit a maximum FAR of 0.6.
Justification:
Modern senior housing projects provide a significant array of recreational amenities, which when
provided within the building increases the total square footage of the structure; therefore,
increasing the FAR. Newer senior housing projects also provide more spacious interior living space,
necessitating a larger FAR.
PDF Page 135 of 194
PDF Page 136 of 194
Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375
3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266
Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com
April 7, 2017
RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)
PUDZ-PL20160001985, Cleary Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)
Dear Sir or Madam:
A formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) rezone, by Raymond J. Cleary Jr., represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady
Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A.,
for the following described property:
The subject property is comprised of approximately 9± acres, located on the south side of Immokalee
Road adjacent to the western and northern boundary of Saturnia Lakes in Section 28, Township 48
South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
Raymond J. Cleary Jr. is asking the County to approve this application, which proposes to develop up to
65 residential dwelling units or 200 units of group housing for seniors.
You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by the applicant to inform nearby
property owners, neighbors and the public of the proposed PUD rezone for the subject property. The
NIM is for informational purposes only and is not a public hearing. The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, April 26, 2017, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road,
Naples, FL 34119.
If you have questions or comments, they can be directed to Sharon Umpenhour:
sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and
Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Project information is posted online
at www.gradyminor.com/planning.
Sincerely,
Sharon Umpenhour
Senior Planning Technician
PDF Page 137 of 194
PDF Page 138 of 194
PL20160001985500'12/13/2016Page 1 of 2RECKEY NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGALLOTUNITSECT TWP RANGE54496002448 ANTHONY J GATTI QPRT4550 OAKSIDE POINT PLMARIETTA, GA 30067 LANTANA LOT 114 114 21 48 2672650002745 AZRAQ, SAMI 9125 QUARTZ LNNAPLES, FL 34120‐4363 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 103 103 28 48 2654496002529 BECKA‐FITZPATRICK, MARIA7434 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 118 118 21 48 2672650002541 BELLANTONI, FRED & LUCY1277 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3340 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 93 93 28 48 2654496002587 BLAIR, ROBERT J BEVERLEY J NORRIS‐BLAIR 7422 LANTANA CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 121 121 21 48 2672650001322 BOWLES, SCOTT M & CHRISTINE M2400 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 32 32 28 48 2672650002305 BRETNER, MALANIE G BRETNER, HAROLD=& RENEE 1282 BARRIGONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119‐3339 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 81 81 28 48 2672650001843 BURNETT, WILLIAM 2395 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 58 58 28 48 2672650001924 CAIONE, THOMAS & JANET2379 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 62 62 28 48 2672650003045 CAPEZZANO, CAMINE1333 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 118 118 28 48 2672650001542 CAUDILL, FRANCES2446 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 43 43 28 48 2672650002622 COHEN, MICHAEL & KATHERINE 3749 PLEASANT SPRINGS DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 97 97 28 48 2654496002561 COLLETTI, STEPHEN P & LUCILLE 7426 LANTANA CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 120 120 21 48 2672650001940 COLLIGAN, STEVEN CVICTORIA M COLLIGAN 2375 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 63 63 28 48 2672650001649 CONA, CHRISTOPHER J & MADI 2435 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 48 48 28 48 2672650001665 CORCORAN, EDWARD J & MILDRED L2431 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 49 49 28 48 2672650002787 CORIDDI, THEODORE G & LAURA J19 COUNTRYSIDE DRHAMLIN, NY 14464SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 105 105 28 48 2672650002046 CORREA, ALEJANDRO & ELENA G 2355 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 68 68 28 48 2672650002525 CORTS JR, JAMES C MORGAN K ROULEAU CORTS6453 HIGHCROFT DR NAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 92 92 28 48 2654496002464 CRAIG III, JAMES W & GINA M7446 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34110LANTANA LOT 115 115 21 48 2672650001568 CURRIER III, WILLARD HKATHLEEN E CURRIER2450 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 44 44 28 48 2672650002282 DALESSANDRO, PIER18 SUSSEX LNLAKE GROVE, NY 11755 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 80 80 28 48 2672650003087 DE SANTIS, PASQUALE & JANE8 AMBER CTEAST ISLIP, NY 11730SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 120 120 28 48 2672650002923 DECARLO, FRANK M 1309 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 112 112 28 48 2672650001500 DEMEESTER, MAURICE D & KAREN M2438 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 41 41 28 48 2672650001526 DYKSTRA, JOSEPH & HAZEL2442 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 42 42 28 48 2672650001966 ELIAS, PATRIK8687 MELROSE AVE, FLOOR 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90069 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 64 64 28 48 2672650001801 ELLIOTT, KEITH & SHELLEY2154 ALDERBROOK DROAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6M4233 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 56 56 28 48 2672650002567 FELT, ROBERT C & SUSAN M1281 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3340 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 94 94 28 48 2672650002583 FIDANLI, GIAN M & MARIE C1285 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3340 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 95 95 28 48 2654496002480 FIVE AND TWO ASSOCIATES L P224 WORMER RDVOORHEESVILLE, NY 12186 LANTANA LOT 116 116 21 48 2672650001584 GARCIA, ERNEST M & DIANE S220 COLDWAY DR # 215PUNTA GORDA, FL 33950SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 45 45 28 48 2672650002020 GARDNER, RONALD L & NELLA D2359 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 67 67 28 48 2672650002088 GEHRING TR, DAVID AROSE GEHRING TR 2347 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 70 70 28 48 2672650002402 GENTILE, NICHOLAS BIRGIT GENTILE 2 CRAMER LN MENDHAM, NJ 07945‐2215 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 86 86 28 48 2672650001429 GROVE, DERRICK & MYRA2422 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 37 37 28 48 2672650001704 GULIANO, RICHARD & CATHERINE 2423 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3354 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 51 51 28 48 2672650002486 HAHN, RAYMOND G & CHARLENE B1265 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 90 90 28 48 2672650001403 HOEPFL, NAN K2418 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 36 36 28 48 2672650003061 HOWARD, DONALD & PATRICIA1337 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 119 119 28 48 26195440009 IMMOKALEE ROAD ASSOC LLC1600 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY# 400 SUNRISE, FL 33323 28 48 26 W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 5 AC OR 1261 PG 1231 28 48 2672650002389 JACKSON, PAUL & LISA KAY400 FOREST AVEWILLIAMSBURG, KY 40769SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 85 85 28 48 2672650002884 JAMES THOMAS DODGSON LIV TRLINDA IADWIGA DODGSON LIV TR3465 S GAYLORD CT APT B422 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 110 110 28 48 2672650001607 JOHN PANKUCH REV TRUST2443 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 46 46 28 48 2672650002800 JOHNSON, NATHAN R & CARISSA1328 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 106 106 28 48 2672650001869 KELLEY, JACK & MELISSA2391 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 59 59 28 48 2672650001445 KELLY, GERALD C & SUSAN M2426 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 38 38 28 48 2672650001788 KHALIL, ADEL M & ENAS M2407 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3354 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 55 55 28 48 2672650001885 KUMAR, RAM BANUREKHA RAJAGOPALAN 2387 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 60 60 28 48 2654496000149 LANTANA AT OLDE CYPRESSHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101 NAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA TRACT P 12148 2672650001306 LAUTENBACH, JOHN BART & DENISE25 OLD HYDE ROADWESTON, CT 06883 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 31 31 28 48 2672650002949 LEWIS, KEARSLEY & LESLIE A1313 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 113 113 28 48 2672650002363 LUCOMBE, LINDA1270 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 84 84 28 48 2654496000806 MAIN, DOUGLAS C & PHYLLIS J 7469 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 32 32 21 48 2654496002600 MATTHEWS JR, JAMES7418 LANTANA CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 122 122 21 48 2672650001720 MICHAEL & COLLEEN VARANA TRUST2419 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3354 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 52 52 28 48 2672650001461 MILLER, PAUL W & KATHY K2430 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 39 39 28 48 2672650001681 MIZELL, NICHOLAS PBRIGETTE L WILLAUER2427 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 50 50 28 48 2672650002004 MOSLEY, JOSEPH & JOYCE 2363 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 66 66 28 48 2672650002347 MULLIN, GERALD M & LORETTA J 1274 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3339 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 83 83 28 48 2672650002826 MUNIM, CHINTAN S & PALAK C1324 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 107 107 28 48 2672650002907 NABBIE, ASHAN & CAROL1308 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 111 111 28 48 2672650002842 NAMIAS, TERRY ACAROL ANN CARNEY1320 TRIANDRA LN NAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 108 108 28 48 2672650002460 NORMAN, JASON & JANET M 1261 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3340 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 89 89 28 48 26195680005 OAKWOOD PARK WEST LLC2150 LOGAN BLVD NNAPLES, FL 34119‐1411 28 48 26 W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 5 AC OR 1643 PG 108 28 48 26195600001 OAKWOOD PARK WEST LLC2170 LOGAN BLVD NNAPLES, FL 34119‐1411 28 48 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 28 48 2672650001746 PALMIERI, JEROME J & VALERIE G 362 KENDAL PLBLUE BELL, PA 19422 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 53 53 28 48 2672650002266 PERSICHETTI, GARY & PATRICIA E11 GRANADA PLMASSAPEQUA, NY 11758‐6620SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 79 79 28 48 2672650002761 PLEWA, GEORGE J & KATHLEEN A103 CAPTAINS WALKEGG HBR TWP, NJ 08234‐7386 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 104 104 28 48 2654496000822 POLLITT, STUART JAMES7473 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 33 33 21 48 2672650001762 PUGACH, JOSEPH MARILYN R FABIAN 2411 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119‐3354 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 54 54 28 48 2672650002444 R P MUNDT EXEMPT TRUST NO 25 WHITE PILLARS LNHOUSTON, TX 77024‐6607 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 88 88 28 48 2672650002321 RICHARDS, JULIA TROY PECK 1278 BARRIGONA CT NAPLES, FL 34119‐3339 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 82 82 28 48 2672650003003 RIEDMILLER, ROSEMARYJAMES RIEDMILLER1325 TRIANDRA LN NAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 116 116 28 48 2654496002503 RIVERA, GUSTAVO ANDREINA GONZALEZ7438 LANTANA CIR NAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 117 117 21 48 2672650002606 RODRIGUEZ, STEVEN & SUSAN W1289 BARRIGONA CTNAPLES, FL 34119‐3340 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 96 96 28 48 2672650001380 ROTHRING, TIMOTHY R & NAOMI D2414 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 35 35 28 48 2654496000767 RYDZEWSKI, LAWRENCE CMICHELLE M RYDZEWSKI 13147 MERGANSER CT PLAINFIELD, IL 60585LANTANA LOT 30 30 21 48 2672650002509 SACHDEVA, RAJENDER K & SUMAN 6456 COACH HOUSE RDLISLE, IL 60532 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 91 91 28 48 2672650001623 SAKELLARIS, LARRY P & ELAINE T12521 CHISZAR DRMOKENA, IL 60448‐1676 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 47 47 28 48 2672650001982 SANCHEZ, ROBERT J JOANNA K CHON 1130 CREEKSIDE WAY # 111167 NAPLES, FL 34108 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 65 65 28 48 2672650001487 SANDY, THOMAS M FRAN CRISTALLI 2434 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 40 40 28 48 2672650002965 SATURNIA LAKES 1317 LLC50 WEST ST APT C1AHARRISON, NY 10528‐4032 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 114 114 28 48 2672650000682 SATURNIA LKS HMOWNRS ASSOC INCC/O MIAMI MANAGEMENT1310 SATURNIA GRANDE DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3408 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE TRACT X 12848 2672650001348 SCRENCI, LORRAINE 2404 BUTTERFLY PALM DRNAPLES, FL 34119‐3353 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 33 33 28 48 2672650002981 SELDIN, HOWARD1321 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 115 115 28 48 2654496002545 SHAW, CEDRIC A & SALOME M 7430 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA LOT 119 119 21 48 2672650001908 SPAGNUOLO JR, LOUIS DBEVERLY A SPAGNUOLO 2383 BUTTERFLY PALM DR NAPLES, FL 34119‐3352 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 61 61 28 48 2654496000783 ST JOHN TRUST7465 LANTANA CIRNAPLES, FL 34119‐8091 LANTANA LOT 31 31 21 48 2672650002062 TIRRI JR, DOMINIC & ALICE3101 HARCOURT RDCLIFTON, NJ 07013 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 69 69 28 48 2654496000123 VITA PIMA LLC2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #101NAPLES, FL 34119 LANTANA TRACT O3 12148 2654496000165 VITAPIMA LLC 2647 PROFESSIONAL CIR STE 1201NAPLES, FL 34119‐8091 LANTANA TRACT R 12148 2672650003029 VITARELLI, JOSEPH NICOLE ZUMAETA1329 TRIANDRA LN NAPLES, FL 34119‐3341 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 117 117 28 48 2672650001364 WOOD, C LANE & SHERYL K4110 7TH AVE SWNAPLES, FL 34110SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 34 34 28 48 2672650002428 ZARENO LIMITED PTNRSHP204 GREENWAY RDLIDO BEACH, NY 11561 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 87 87 28 48 2672650001827 ZARENO LIMITED PTNRSHP3426 ADRIATIC CTNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 57 57 28 48 26PDF Page 139 of 194
PL20160001985500'12/13/2016Page 2 of 272650002868 ZOHIL, MIKE & ASHLEY1316 TRIANDRA LNNAPLES, FL 34119 SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE LOT 109 109 28 48 26OLDE CYPRESS MASTER PROPERTY ASSOCIATION, INC.9150 GALLERIA COURT SUITE 201NAPLES, FL 34109HERITAGE GREENS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT2685 HORSESHOE DR. S. SUITE 215NAPLES, FL 34104PDF Page 140 of 194
PROOF O.K.BY:_____________________________O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY:___________________________
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY •SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE
ADVERTISER:Q.GRADY MINOR &ASSOCIA PROOF CREATED AT :4/3/2017 9:06 PM
SALES PERSON:Ivonne Gori PROOF DUE:-
PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE:04/09/17
SIZE:3 col X 9.25 in
ND-1559323.INDD
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
Petition PUDZ-PL20160001985,Cleary RPUD
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D.Wayne Arnold,
AICP,of Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.and Richard D.Yo vanovich,Esq.of
Coleman,Yo vanovich and Koester,P.A.,representing Raymond J.Cleary Jr.on:
We dnesday,April 26,2017,5:30 pm
at
Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church,7070 Immokalee Road,Naples,FL 34119
The subject property is comprised of approximately 9±acres,located on the
south side of Immokalee Road adjacent to the western and northern boundary
of Saturnia Lakes in Section 28,To wnship 48 South,Range 26 East,Collier
County,Florida.
Raymond J.Cleary Jr.is asking the County to approve this application,which
proposes to develop up to 65 residential dwelling units or 200 units of group
housing for seniors.
Business and property owners,residents and visitors are welcome to attend
the presentation.The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational
purposes only;it is not a public hearing.Project information is posted online at
www.gradyminor.com/planning.If you have questions or comments,they can
be directed by mail,phone,fax or e-mail by April 26,2017 to:
Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician
Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.,3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs,Florida 34134
Phone:239.947.1144 Fax:239.947.0375 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com
April 9,2017 ND-1559323
PDF Page 141 of 194
PDF Page 142 of 194
PDF Page 143 of 194
PDF Page 144 of 194
1
TRANSCRIPT OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
CLEARY RPUD
APRIL 26, 2017
Appearances:
RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ.
WAYNE ARNOLD
JIM BANKS
RAY BELLOWS
SHARON UMPENHOUR
PDF Page 145 of 194
2
MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you all for coming.
What we're doing tonight is a neighborhood
information meeting for a project, and I'm assuming
most of you people are from Saturnia Lakes. Am I
close in my guess?
Okay. So it's near your project or where you
live. This is your project right here. This is
the nine acres we're going to be talking about
tonight.
And what we do is, one of the county
processes, whenever we do a land-use petition,
we're required to have a neighborhood information
meeting to allow the neighbors and the community
around us to know what we're doing. So you can ask
any questions you want. We'll do our best to
answer any questions you have.
If you've got concerns, we'll listen to your
concerns, obviously, and try to incorporate as many
of them as we can, if we can incorporate them into
the project.
But what the county does as part of the
process is we have a neighborhood information
meeting right after we get our first round of
county comments on our petition.
The next step after this would be to resubmit
PDF Page 146 of 194
3
the response to the county comments. We would then
have a hearing in front of the Collier County
Planning Commission, which makes a recommendation
to the Board of County Commissioners.
Then, ultimately, the Board of County
Commissioners will make the decision on whether or
not to approve this process.
So there are a team of people here to discuss
the petition and answer any questions.
My name is Richard Yovanovich, and I am the
land-use attorney representing the property owner.
Wayne Arnold and Sharon Umpenhour with Grady Minor
are the planning team, engineering team for the
project, and they can answer any questions I can't
answer. And Jim Banks is our transportation
consultant to the project and can answer any
questions regarding transportation concerns you may
have if I can't answer them.
So, we'll explain the project to you as to
what we're doing, and then we will open it up to
you to answer any questions you may have, but the
project is this nine-acre piece right here. It's
owned by the Clearys. It's basically two pieces,
which they've owned for a few years now. It's a
total of approximately nine acres.
PDF Page 147 of 194
4
We're in what the county calls the urban area.
So it's where development is supposed to be
occurring in Collier County. Based upon the
current comprehensive plan, it's supposed to be
developed for residential or senior housing. Those
are the types of uses that are, under the
comprehensive plan, to go here. It's not supposed
to be any type of commercial development that's
supposed to go on this type of property.
So our request is for either residential, with
a maximum number of 65 units, or senior housing,
independent assisted living type of facilities on
the property, at a floor area ratio of .6, not to
exceed 200 units for senior-related housing.
Under the county's comprehensive plan, the
base density for most projects is four units an
acre. However, for projects less than 20 acres in
size, because they're smaller and they're infill
pieces, you can ask for up to three additional
units per acre as long as you agree to buy what
they call transfer development rights, which is
basically out a little bit further east here, the
county has set up a program where they have sending
lands and receiving lands.
Sending lands, basically, have to be
PDF Page 148 of 194
5
preserved. In (indiscernible) the county gave
those people who want sending lands (indiscernible)
transfer development rights.
So certain lands, you can transfer those
development lands to, and it's the smaller parcels
of the urban area that you can do that.
So if we want to go above four units per acre,
we would have to buy additional density to get up
to a maximum of 65 units that we're asking for on
the site.
We run the gamut of residential. We can do
single family, we can do duplexes, we can do
multifamily as far as the options that we have on
this piece of property.
And then, again, they consider senior housing
to be an institutional type of use. It doesn't
really fit the typical residential. If you've gone
down Vanderbilt Beach Road, you'll see Sandalwood
and Bradford Square, right. We did both -- Wayne
and I did both of those. Those are independent
living facilities.
The typical -- the typical ratio for senior
housing versus regular housing is a 4 to 1 ratio.
Obviously, we're not asking for 260 units, but
that's the typical ratio because most people that
PDF Page 149 of 194
6
move in there, the average age is at least 78 or
older. Even though it says you have to be 55,
minimum, it's usually a little older. They usually
start with a car, but they never really drive the
car because transportation is provided in those
types of facilities.
So the reason (indiscernible) is because the
traffic really equates to about 4 to 1 when we're
talking about going to a regular senior -- senior
housing versus regular residential.
The way -- here's our proposed master plan,
and at this point we really don't know whether it's
going to be either multifamily, single family or
the senior housing, but what we've done --
obviously, this is Saturnia Lakes here and here.
We're required to maintain 15 percent of our
native vegetation in the preserve area. We have
put the preserve area on the south side. I'm
directionally challenged, so sometimes I get my
north and south backwards, but the south side of
the property, so it will serve as, basically, a
buffer to the residences that are on this
cul-de-sac right here in Saturnia Lakes.
Our development standards for single family,
which most of you, I think -- I don't know if you
PDF Page 150 of 194
7
have any multifamily in Saturnia Lakes or not. I
know the zoning allowed for it, but I don't think
it was built, but the single-family development
standards in our project are 30 feet zone type,
which is if you have a pitched roof, basically,
it's to the midpoint of the roof, 40 feet actual,
which is tippy top of the roof, and then if it's
multifamily, it's 45 -- it's 40 feet zoned, 50 feet
tippy top. And then if we do the senior housing,
it would be 45 feet zoned, 50 feet tippy top. So
the peak of the roof, the tallest thing on the
building would be 50 feet for the group housing,
senior housing, 45 feet -- I'm sorry. 50 feet for
multifamily and then 40 feet for single family.
Obviously, our accesses are going to be off of
Immokalee Road. We are proposing our access to be
on the west side of the property. The county is
going to require us to share access with the
property owner to the west.
So as you can see on our master plan, we've
prepared for that. So we'll have an access off of
Immokalee Road. I don't think we'll get a left in.
We'll probably just get a right in, right out off
of Immokalee Road.
We'll share access with this piece right here.
PDF Page 151 of 194
8
And our water management would be up front with our
preserve on the back, and then we'll have buffers
around the entirety of the site, landscape buffers
that essentially are a six-foot tall hedge which
serves -- basically, you won't be able to see
through the hedge. I think we're required
(indiscernible) opaque within a year, I believe it
is, to six feet (indiscernible).
It's really a pretty vanilla project for what
we're doing. It's a smaller scale. There's
basically only infill parcels left in the urban
area. You're not going to see too many big
projects coming through anymore within the urban
area. There may be further east, the bigger
projects, but you're going to have these -- you'll
probably see a bunch of smaller, 10 acre, 15 acre,
20-acre parcels going through, not by you, but just
throughout Collier County at this point.
That's an overview of what we're proposing to
do. I can answer any questions you may have, and I
know this gentleman is sort of ready.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. Who are you
sharing the entryway with, the GL Homes project?
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. This is -- I believe
this, Cullen Walker (phonetic) runs this piece
PDF Page 152 of 194
9
right here and GL is a little bit further to the
west. The corner piece is Livingston -- no, it's
not. It's Logan. Logan and Immokalee is what GL
Homes (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is that where that
driveway is now, kind of?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. If you look, it's hard
to see on this aerial, but there's a little
driveway right here right now that's kind of
between the two pieces. That's technically on our
piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: But, yeah, this is the
Falling Waters piece right here, and I believe this
is GL right here.
Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the
dimensions between Saturnia Boulevard that goes
into our project and (indiscernible)?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, here's what I know.
We've got a bunch of dimensions here.
The house -- there are -- we measured from
several houses, because I know I can't tell you
(indiscernible), but I can tell you from this
house, which is the closest house, it's 297 feet
PDF Page 153 of 194
10
from the -- I think that's the pool cage to our
property. So it's, basically, 300 feet before you
get to our property.
And then it's a little bit further back. This
house right here is 316 feet. This house right
here is 323 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But I'm more
concerned about our drive in. We're going to be
(indiscernible) your houses --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Over here?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. When we're
driving in our boulevard, we'll be seeing all this
(indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: When you're driving in, can
you see anybody (indiscernible)?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We're right there.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't have that distance.
Sharon, do you know that distance?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It looks like it's
only 5, 10 feet.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Oh, it's more than that. I
can promise you it's more than that.
And that's where, if you look on this here
(indiscernible) we have the vegetation
(indiscernible) boulevard. So (indiscernible).
PDF Page 154 of 194
11
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The distance from
the house you just pointed out to the closest part
of your development will be close to 300 feet.
What about elevation?
In other words, if you build something that's
max 50 feet tall, will the homes on that street see
that? Is that part of their view? Because right
now, their view includes a lake and a beautifully
landscaped hillside.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. To be honest with you,
I'm sure you will see part of that building.
There's no way you're not going to see part of that
building, but you're not going to have a big
building just staring at you, because we're
required to have a landscape buffer.
You guys (indiscernible) here on your side,
too, but I can't imagine that, at some point, when
you're driving on that or looking out some part of
your yard, that you're not going to get a glimpse
of this building.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But you need to
understand that the people that live along that
street, they paid a premium price to be on the lake
with a landscaped view. Now you're going to
destroy that.
PDF Page 155 of 194
12
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, and I appreciate that,
but at the same time, and don't -- don't -- I don't
know how to be anything but direct -- this piece of
property is asking for what it's allowed to do
under the county's plan. And I'm sorry if someone
represented to you, and I wouldn't be surprised,
that maybe you'll never see anything next door to
you, but the reality is you're going to see
something here.
This property has rights, through the existing
comprehensive plan, to develop. We will provide
buffers, but I will not -- I can't represent to you
you're not going to see another building on this
piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So will the
homeowners along that street have an opportunity to
express their objections to the county?
MR. YOVANOVICH: You will have an opportunity,
of course. You can go to the Planning Commission
meeting and also the Board of County Commissioners
meeting.
Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What is the
maximum elevation that they can build at?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: 50 feet.
PDF Page 156 of 194
13
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: 50?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. What we're asking
for.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Tippy top, and I coined that
phrase because I didn't know any other way to
describe it, tippy top of the senior housing will
be 55 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. Do you know
how high it is for Sandalwood?
MR. YOVANOVICH: For Sandalwood, what did we
do? I think Sandalwood's taller. I think
that's over there.
Ray Bellows, by the way, he's with Collier
County. He is the planner responsible for this
project now as we go through the process. So if
you've got comments you want to make to the county,
Ray Bellows is your contact person to address
county comments. If you want to talk to us, it's
me and Wayne.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What is the
elevation of Sandalwood?
MR. ARNOLD: Sandalwood, I don't remember the
exact height, but that's a three-story building
over parking. So you've got three living levels.
PDF Page 157 of 194
14
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But what are we
talking about, what is the elevation? Are we
talking about we're going to get something that
height?
MR. ARNOLD: It's probably very similar to the
height we're asking for.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's going to be
three stories, you're talking about?
MR. ARNOLD: Well, we've asked for -- we
don't -- the county doesn't typically want you to
identify numbers of stories. They ask for the
height.
But just to point out, I mean, I know they
didn't build multifamily, but I worked on the Regus
(phonetic) PUD, which that's what Saturnia Lakes
was originally zoned as, and it made provisions for
50 feet zoned height in your community.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So if I'm sitting
here, I can see the top of that building. Is that
about what we would see?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Wait. I know exactly what
you're saying.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: So you're asking me if you're
the same (indiscernible) see that much of the
PDF Page 158 of 194
15
building?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Right. If I'm in
my backyard, and here's the landscaping and
everything, is it going to be that high or --
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know how tall your
landscaping is in your backyard, so I don't -- I
don't want to (indiscernible) your backyard, so I
don't know.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah, I
understand.
MR. YOVANOVICH: What we can do -- what we can
do is we can put together --
MR. ARNOLD: A buffer exhibit.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- a buffer exhibit that will
show you sightlines as if you were in your backyard
looking, because it all depends. You know, if
you're right close to your trees, you're going to
see nothing. You move a little bit further back,
you may see some of the roof.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Knowing that the
community that we live in now and all the
surrounding communities are basically single-family
dwellings and Sandalwood on Vanderbilt Beach Road
is the senior citizens, would you take into
consideration that our area is mainly single
PDF Page 159 of 194
16
family, so maybe that would fit in better with the
community surrounding, the houses that are across
on Logan?
MR. YOVANOVICH: What happens, from a
development standpoint, is, obviously, your
community -- I don't remember how many acres it
started out as, but it's obviously a master planned
community (indiscernible) on a much bigger scale
with the ability to put in all the necessary
infrastructure and water management, streets and
all of that.
MR. ARNOLD: 241 acres.
MR. YOVANOVICH: You can get --
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What was it
(indiscernible)?
MR. ARNOLD: 240 units -- 240 acres.
MR. YOVANOVICH: 240 acres. So you had a much
-- you had a bigger -- you had a bigger pallet, if
you will, to work from. When you get into these
smaller infill projects, just by their size,
they're going to result in multifamily-type
projects or senior housing-type projects, just
because of the size of the land, to make all of the
infrastructure work. It just can't -- it can't
work as a single family.
PDF Page 160 of 194
17
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Well, considering
that the dwellings where we are and the ones across
from Logan that -- I think it's some kind of woods
over there, people have single family --
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oakside.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oakside, yeah.
They have single-family homes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Would it be --
MR. YOVANOVICH: And that's why we'll address
it through our required landscape buffers, our
distances from your homes, being 300 feet away from
the nearest home. We'll take care of that
through -- through those -- the buffer requirements
that we're putting in place and the like is how
we'll address those issues.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How close to the --
your property borderline faces Saturnia, closest
houses, are you allowed, by zoning, to place the
house -- your --
MR. YOVANOVICH: What's our setback?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, what's your
setback?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Is that what you're saying?
PDF Page 161 of 194
18
Okay.
Do you know (indiscernible) Wayne?
MR. ARNOLD: No.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Give me two seconds.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: What have you got? Okay.
You don't have (indiscernible)?
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's probably
(indiscernible), right?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. ARNOLD: Probably. (Indiscernible) has 20
feet on that.
MR. YOVANOVICH: The closest we'd be to our
property line would be 20 foot (indiscernible) I
think (indiscernible) rear yard.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: It could be 20 feet from our
property line.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And there's a
requirement (indiscernible) alone (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would you
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Where is Immokalee
Road on there?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Immokalee Road is up here.
PDF Page 162 of 194
19
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's Immokalee
Road?
MR. YOVANOVICH: This is Immokalee Road here.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And that would be
the entrance?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That would be our entrance
right here. This would be our entrance. And your
entrance is over here.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible).
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible)
didn't have enough buffer (indiscernible). Maybe
put some tall trees or something like that to help,
you know, cut the view down.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would you be willing
to help Saturnia Lakes rebuild our buffer area
within our side? Would you do that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That's not an unusual request
that you're asking. So I will obviously take that
to my client to talk about that. We'll have to
coordinate it with your homeowners association,
obviously, to get the ability to come on that
property, plant it, and I'm assuming you all would,
if we planted, you would be willing to take over
PDF Page 163 of 194
20
and make sure (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I can't speak for
the community, but --
MR. YOVANOVICH: But, you know, those are the
types of things that are not usual for us to look
at.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Can you tell me the
distance from the bottom house on the south end to
the proposed --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Here?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah, that house.
And also what's the -- I see that the preserve is
1.72 acres. Can you give me that in feet from
south to north with that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, I can.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: All right. Thank
you.
MR. YOVANOVICH: The width of the buffer?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: This is 165 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay, 165 feet.
Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And then this house, which I
think is -- this house is 60 feet from the property
PDF Page 164 of 194
21
edge, and that would be a total of 225.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: All right. Great.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Is that you?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: My in-laws, yes.
They are that house right there.
MR. YOVANOVICH: When you said stop, I figured
I (indiscernible).
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Just two questions.
I'm sorry if -- I didn't see the first
(indiscernible). The buffer will be at the
southern end of that piece of property?
MR. YOVANOVICH: The preserve --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- is going to be here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And how wide -- how
deep is that?
MR. YOVANOVICH: That's 165 feet.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. And the other
thing is, is there a time limit on when your client
is going to decide whether he'll go with individual
housing or multifamily housing? And maybe it's a
question for the gentleman from Collier County.
When would they have to tell you, make a decision
on what kind of housing it would be?
PDF Page 165 of 194
22
And then I have another question. What can we
do to influence it one way or another?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: If anything.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. I am the zoning manager
for Collier County. I've been with the county
about 29 years, and when PUD zoning projects come
in like this, there's generally a multitude of
dwelling types that the developer typically
requests. And that allows for them to address the
changing market conditions without having to come
back through a public hearing every time.
So, generally speaking, the market -- the
applicant's trying to respond to the market
conditions, and the request they're proposing is
multifamily?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, sir. Well, we also
asked for single family.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. So they allow for a mix
of single and multifamily. And what will happen is
staff will review those development standards, the
building heights, setbacks, the landscape buffers,
water management, the traffic impacts, and make
sure that they meet all county codes and
regulations.
PDF Page 166 of 194
23
We don't -- the county has no rules or
regulations that dictate what type of dwelling
units can be constructed in the area. That's a
market condition.
We typically listen and want encouragement of
the public, the surrounding communities, to get
their input, to see how we can work with the
applicant to reach any consensus where we can, and
maybe providing additional buffer or additional
setbacks or some other condition that could help.
Anyways, the final decision of whether a
project is approved or denied is by the Board of
County Commissioners. So, certainly, your input,
letters expressing concerns or support for a
project is greatly appreciated, because we can use
that to incorporate in our analysis and findings.
MR. ARNOLD: If I could just add to what Ray
said. Just in your own community, for instance,
when I was working with the GL Homes to obtain your
zoning from agricultural to PUD, we included all
the gamut of dwelling unit types, because I
remember doing iterations of site plans for them,
and we had pods that were going to be multifamily,
and some that were zero lot lines, some that were
going to be townhomes, and they ultimately made the
PDF Page 167 of 194
24
decision that this community was better suited to
be single family from their marketability
standpoint.
Part of that's when it comes to market and how
many units you have. And as Rich said, this is
very much an infill project. I mean, you have the
luxury of 241 acres to do some really large scale
master planning. And we're pretty confined with
the little, which we call it postage stamp site by
most standards.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to start here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'm sorry. I might
have missed this, but does this not require a
zoning change?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. And that's what we're
doing. We're going through the process. We're
currently zoned (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I mean, if I heard
it, I'm sorry.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I may not have
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible)
here.
MR. YOVANOVICH: They will be. We'll go to
the Planning Commission. We don't have any dates
PDF Page 168 of 194
25
set yet.
MR. ARNOLD: No.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And the building
you're talking about potentially could be the
equivalent of like a four-story building.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: That's the senior
(indiscernible).
MR. ARNOLD: Could be.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to say the senior
could be up to four stories. I don't think they're
going to be able to get five stories in a 45-foot
zone lot. So maybe four stories.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And how many units
will be in the four-story building?
MR. YOVANOVICH: If we did senior housing, we
could have up to 200 units, which, from a
transportation standpoint, believe it or not, is
less than the other alternative of multifamily.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Because they don't drive.
They really don't drive. When they move in, they
come in with their car, and then they
PDF Page 169 of 194
26
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would they be rental
units or --
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know. Don't know.
Sandalwood is. There's a big -- there's varying
needs out there. Not everybody is moving into
Moorings Park. There are -- and Sandalwood is at a
nice market for people to pay a nice -- it's not
cheap, but a nice monthly rental.
So it depends on, you know, who the senior
developer would be.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's a good thing
they're not driving if they had to pull out onto
Immokalee Road.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: The question was,
though, when, during the process, will that be
decided? On what type of --
MR. YOVANOVICH: We will -- we will make the
decision -- I'll be honest with you, the decision
will be made when the ultimate developer buys the
piece from us. So it will either be sold to --
this will be either sold to a multifamily
developer, a single-family developer or senior
PDF Page 170 of 194
27
housing. It will not be a combination of those
things. Someone will come in and pick from one of
those, basically, three options.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Thank you.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Anybody else in the back
before I come back to the front?
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Again, I think one
of the questions was when is this decision slated
to be?
MR. BELLOWS: Well, the staff reviews the
submittal when it first comes in. So our
transportation folks review it, landscape folks,
fire, water management, engineering. They all
review it to make sure it meets county codes.
For water management, so it doesn't have storm
water running off into adjoining developments.
Transportation will make sure that there's not
going to be a capacity problem or an access issue.
They'll look at whether signalization is warranted.
All those comments go into -- the lead planner
in this case will probably be me. I'm taking over
for someone who is ill, and we'll generate a report
outlining how it's consistent with the Collier
County Comprehensive Plan.
PDF Page 171 of 194
28
Density is one of those things that we'll
compare. Our comprehensive plan limits density in
certain areas. And you can get more density by
qualifying for some processes such as affordable
housing. They're not doing that in this case.
They're not proposing an affordable housing project
with density bonuses.
MR. YOVANOVICH: No.
MR. BELLOWS: But what is going on is staff is
trying to make sure what is being proposed is
consistent with our codes and regulations,
including water management district permits that
are required.
But the first step in the process is the
zoning step. The next step -- and you're -- the
board would be looking at an option, single-family
option or multifamily option. It's still going to
be an administrative process after the board
approves the zoning. It's an administrative
process after that. If they come in for single
family, it will be a platting process, which is
done administratively.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: The board
(indiscernible) the board can hear this?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes.
PDF Page 172 of 194
29
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. After all the reviews are
done, and depending on if the applicant --
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. BELLOWS: Some of it is --
MR. YOVANOVICH: We probably (indiscernible)
catch up, because you're new, you know, where we
are.
MR. BELLOWS: Yeah.
MR. YOVANOVICH: But my guess is we're not
going to be in front of the Board of County
Commissioners until Octoberish at the earliest.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, late fall.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And will our
community be notified in that period?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Absolutely. You will get --
if you got a letter for this --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: -- you'll get a letter for
that. Your association will get a letter. I'm
assuming you guys can do e-mail blasts. There will
be signs on the property, out on the street, that
will say when the hearing is.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That no one can
read.
PDF Page 173 of 194
30
MR. YOVANOVICH: There will be an ad in the
newspaper --
MR. BELLOWS: But at least you know to call
the county and we can fill you in on the details.
MR. YOVANOVICH: My guess is we're probably
talking in October, if everything goes smoothly
from this point forward.
MR. ARNOLD: I'd like to jump in, too. Since
we don't have hearing dates set, Sharon, who is
recording the meeting for us tonight, she's also
our lead planning technician at the office, we'll
set up a link on our -- on the county's website,
right, or our website?
MS. UMPENHOUR: Our website through the
county.
MR. ARNOLD: We'll set up a link that -- to
keep you up to date at least with the current
submittal information that's there and then the
county provides notices of the public hearing. So
they will notify, I'm pretty sure, your
association.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And your association, I know,
was very good. When we had to cancel the first
meeting, they sent out an e-mail blast and were
PDF Page 174 of 194
31
very good about assisting us to get the notice out
to you all.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, ma'am.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the chance
of all this construction happening at the same time
with this project and then the GL Homes one for the
shopping center? Could it possibly all impact all
at one time?
MR. YOVANOVICH: I don't know where they are
in the process.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: In the timeline?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Wayne, are you working on
that project?
MR. ARNOLD: I'm not working on that project.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm not working on that one,
so I don't know where they are in the process.
MR. ARNOLD: I think they recently held a
neighborhood meeting, didn't they?
MR. YOVANOVICH: They had a neighborhood
information meeting?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes. I think they
said 2018, but, you know --
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay.
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, they're a little bit ahead
of us, but they're also having to amend the
PDF Page 175 of 194
32
comprehensive plan to convert that corner to
commercial, so.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, ma'am, and then you,
sir.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I'm really
concerned, because it's my understanding that, from
here down to Ave Maria, they are building about 11
different complexes without infrastructure going
across. How can the county approve all of these
developments going on? This Immokalee Road will be
like 75, only we have three highways instead of
four. I don't understand why.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, and Jim Banks can get
into the greater detail, but the county has what's
called concurrency management. There is a
requirement that each project, when it comes
basically in for either its site development plan
or its plat, there's another transportation study
done at that time to make sure that the capacity
that the road has is still available for that
project to go forward.
If there's not, just because we get the zoning
doesn't guarantee you're ultimately going to get it
built.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: They are taking
PDF Page 176 of 194
33
their sweet time doing roads going up across.
MR. YOVANOVICH: And I understand that, but
from the analysis that's been done and the review
that's been done, there is adequate capacity for
our proposed project and the number of trips that
are going to go through, because the county does
have the concurrency management system. If you
don't have water, if you don't have sewer, if you
don't have roads, you don't get to build.
So we're going to go through another analysis
when either the plat or the sight plan goes through
to make sure that what's there today is there in
the future when we are going to be building.
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Can you talk a
little bit about the traffic pattern?
Particularly, it appears you're going to be
shooting traffic through the shopping mall that's
going to come out on Logan or then they're going
make a (indiscernible) go up and make a U-turn
(indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, we're actually here.
We're actually right here.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You're not next to
the shopping mall?
PDF Page 177 of 194
34
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. This is Mr. Walker's
property. I don't know what title he owns it
under, but this is another piece. This is not us.
And this is the shopping center.
In a perfect world, and this is what the
county likes to see happen, is you can see on our
master plan they're going to require us to
interconnect. If I'm, again, a betting man,
they're going to want this project to connect to
the shopping center so people who are in our
community will not have to get out onto Immokalee
Road to find their way to the shopping center,
either getting there or coming back.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Especially if
they're assisted living.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Yeah. They'll either walk or
they'll drive (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: In golf carts.
MR. YOVANOVICH: (Indiscernible) driving golf
carts. But there will be -- hopefully, there will
be an interconnection to do what should happen,
which is to keep people off the main roads.
Whether this property owner is going to want
that to happen or not, I don't know, I can't speak
for them. But, ultimately, the county's desire is
PDF Page 178 of 194
35
to have kind of these (indiscernible) frontage
roads to allow people to go back and forth without
getting onto Immokalee Road or --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How big is the space
between your property and the shopping mall? Is it
the same --
MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, it's about a 10-acre tract.
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's about the same width.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Same width?
MR. ARNOLD: It's about a 10-acre tract. It's
about 330 feet wide.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, in essence, they
could come in there and build another 200 units for
senior housing or whatever, whoever.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. Or they could --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So we could have a
major explosion of people in this narrow area here.
MR. YOVANOVICH: I would -- again --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I mean, there's no
other use for that property, right?
MR. YOVANOVICH: There's not. I mean, it's
either -- it's going to be some form of
residential.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's got to be
PDF Page 179 of 194
36
residential property.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Most of us in here are
getting a little older. So, at some point, we're
going to move into some of those senior housing
places, some of us sooner than later, but there's,
you know, there's definitely -- I can't tell you
how many senior housing projects we've taken
through the process in the last few years to meet
public demand.
Now, it will probably slow for a while because
there have been a few built, but it's in big
demand.
Anybody -- anybody else?
So just to recap where we'll go next. We'll
be going to the Planning Commission probably
sometime late summer?
MR. ARNOLD: Yep.
MR. YOVANOVICH: You'll get notice of that.
There will be signs on the property. There will be
ads in the paper.
And then we'll go to the Board of County
Commissioners, probably latter part of -- I would
guess Octoberish we'll get in front of them.
Again, it's a public hearing process.
The commissioners want to hear from you.
PDF Page 180 of 194
37
Staff wants to hear from you. And we want to hear
from you.
The suggestions about providing some
additional landscaping on your side is a reasonable
request, and we'll talk to our client about that.
There are ways to address concerns you may have
with buffers and breaking up what you might -- may
or may not see from (indiscernible).
Yes, sir.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are you at liberty
to say who your client is?
MR. YOVANOVICH: It's the Clearys. The
Clearys own it, but they don't -- they own the
property, but they're not developers. So I don't
know who the ultimate builder may or not be
(indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will the zoning
automatically -- whatever you're zoned for in your
piece of property, will that automatically carry
over to the Walker's property?
MR. YOVANOVICH: No. They'll have to go
through the very same process we are going through,
to talk to you all about what they want to do with
their property and when they're ready to develop.
Just because we get approved doesn't guarantee them
PDF Page 181 of 194
38
anything.
Their property is a little bit different. We
have to (indiscernible) preserve. They will
probably (indiscernible) living on this cul-de-sac,
I guess there's some (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So, currently --
MR. YOVANOVICH: But we have no impact on our
neighbor.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: So, currently,
both properties are zoned for single family?
MR. ARNOLD: Agriculture.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right now, they're zoned
agricultural, which, in the urban area, basically,
is okay for future development.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I just don't
understand where everybody fits in and where we
are. Your clients are the property owners now?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And then the
property owners will probably sell to a developer
once the property is cleared for building?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Once we get the zoning
approved, it typically works that way.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Especially on smaller
PDF Page 182 of 194
39
parcels.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Bigger parcels, like GL
Homes, put it through the process themselves.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. Like they
did for the shopping center.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. Yes. So usually
that -- for small pieces like that, in order for it
to move forward, they like to --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, basically,
you're in the process of preparing that and,
legally, for a developer to buy it and develop it?
MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. And whoever --
whoever develops the property will have to live
with all of the commitments we made in the PUD. So
it's not just this group. It's whoever develops
it.
That's where you'll find your safeguards and
make sure that you're getting (indiscernible).
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Is your client
bidding on that piece of property between the one
you're describing and the shopping mall?
MR. YOVANOVICH: This right here?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes.
MR. YOVANOVICH: No.
PDF Page 183 of 194
40
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: They're not bidding
on it.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It's not for sale.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's not for sale.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The nursery owns
it.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) for
sale.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: I used to believe that, too,
but I'm not sure this is for sale.
MR. ARNOLD: That property that, Rich, is next
to our property, is owned by the Cullen Walkers.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: -- the landscaper, who owns that
parcel.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Right.
MR. ARNOLD: I don't know -- Cullen owns
pieces of property all over Collier County.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, it's a useless
piece of property, and particularly when he passes
away, you know, his heirs are not going to want to
sit there with a useless piece of property.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's
probably long off.
PDF Page 184 of 194
41
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It could be.
(Multiple simultaneous speakers.)
MR. YOVANOVICH: Any other questions,
comments? Yes, sir.
MR. NADEL: I'd just like to offer an
informational comment. I'm your neighbor, Dick
Nadel (phonetic) for Saturnia. I'm the commercial
realtor who has been representing the Cleary family
for the last couple of years on this property. I
also sold the big piece of property to GL Homes.
Just so you know, that property could have
gone a number of different directions. As a PUD,
it was eligible to be a school, a church. I've
been contacted by people who had a mosque, okay,
Ractrac, gas stations. And the highest and best
use for this property, to me, would be a high-end,
you know, type of development that they're talking
about here.
You know, the owners of a property have a
right to sell, of course. And you just want, you
know -- we, as homeowners in Saturnia, want to make
sure that it's, you know, it's going to be
compatible with what we're doing.
Something on -- it's upscale like Sandalwood
or something similar to that would make a lot of
PDF Page 185 of 194
42
sense, more than a lot of the other possibilities,
and I've seen them in the last two or three years.
So I think they're doing the right thing. It
will be the best for the folks. It could be a lot
worse, I guarantee.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: 200 units on here
seems like an awfully high density to say this is
high-end property.
MR. YOVANOVICH: That would be the max.
Everybody -- all the potential buyers don't need
that much. Some need 150, 160, 180. So you don't
know. You don't know until somebody actually puts
a contract on it.
MR. ARNOLD: And if I might just add to that.
You don't really know until one of the senior
housing providers comes along. Some do memory care
and have many smaller units than you would
typically find if you were just, you know, Moorings
Park, where you're selling a very much luxury
lifestyle of several thousand square foot units.
So until we know what that mix is, you just don't
know.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But I think, in this
area, you want it to be high end. This is a
high-end area around here, and you don't want to be
PDF Page 186 of 194
43
overly dense. And, you know, keep the real estate
values.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Those are the kind
of people that we've been talking to, by the way,
higher end. It makes a lot of sense.
MR. ARNOLD: And these places are, you know,
one, they have to provide dining facilities.
They've got to provide a wellness center. They're
highly amenitized places.
So they are high end. It's not -- it's not
just -- I mean, 200 units sounds like a lot of
units, but it's usually one or two people in those
units. A lot of times, there's just one person in
those units, but they have high -- they have lots
of amenities within that facility, because -- and
they have transportation that takes them to and
from where they want to go.
So it's a community that they're very close
knit, companionship, they're not going, traveling
about a lot. They've got what they need right
there for themselves. And it is going to be a
high-end community.
I don't -- I think Sandalwood is somewhere
around $4,000 a month.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Close to it, yes.
PDF Page 187 of 194
44
MR. ARNOLD: Okay. I mean, that's not
inexpensive.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: But just, as an
example, what size are the Sandalwood units square
footage-wise?
MR. ARNOLD: You know, I was afraid you were
going to ask me that. I don't know. I do know
that --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are they like two
bedroom, one bedroom?
MR. ARNOLD: Some are.
MR. YOVANOVICH: Most of them are -- they are
two bedrooms. They have some two bedrooms. A lot
of them are one bedrooms, because they are single
people.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: There are studios
also, just to (indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: There may be some studios,
but I think most of them are, you know, a ONE
bedroom with a living room. And a lot of them have
the cooking facilities, but then --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible).
MR. YOVANOVICH: But they like to know they
can if they want to. It's a nice little apartment
for people that don't want to have their own condo
PDF Page 188 of 194
45
or house.
Any other questions or comments?
All right. Well, I thank you and I thank you
for coming, and have a good evening.
MR. ARNOLD: Thank you all.
(Recording concluded.)
PDF Page 189 of 194
46
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that:
1. The foregoing transcript contains a full,
true and correct transcript of proceedings in the
above-entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of
my knowledge and ability from a digital audio recording.
2. I am not counsel for, related to, or
employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled
cause.
3. I am not financially or otherwise
interested in the outcome of this case.
DATED: May 7, 2017
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED:
________________________
Joyce B. Howell
PDF Page 190 of 194
GradyMinorCivil Engineers●Land Surveyors●Planners●Landscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.3800 Via Del ReyBonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.43800200'400'100'SCALE: 1" = 200'IMMOKALEE ROADLOGAN BOULEVARD\\qgm.local\files\Planning\PROJ - PLANNING\CPRZ - Cleary Property Rezone (PL20160001985)\Drawings\Aerial 2017.dwg, 4/26/2017 12:44:43 PM, DWG To PDF(noLayers).pc3,ARCH full bleed D (24.00 x 36.00 Inches)PDF Page 191 of 194
SATURNIA LAKES
15' L.B.E.
TRACT "OS15"
(OPEN SPACE,
D.E. AND A.E.)SATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE(PB 36, PG 56-65)SATURNIA LAKES BOULEVARDSATURNIA LAKES PLAT ONE
(PB 36, PG 56-65)
TRACT "OS15"
(OPEN SPACE, D.E. AND A.E.)
ZONED: A
UNDEVELOPED
15' L.B.E.30' ROW EASEMENT(OR 1097, PG 2181)TO BE VACATED30' RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT
(OR 1097, PG 2181)
TO BE VACATED
WATER MANAGEMENT
RESIDENTIAL
20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
PUD BOUNDARY
RIGAS PUD
RESIDENTIAL
IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR846) 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY
10' WIDE TYPE 'A'
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
PRESERVE
RIGAS PUD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
15' WIDE
TYPE 'B'
LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
0 100'50'
SCALE: 1" = 100'
GradyMinor
Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects
Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266
Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A.
3800 Via Del Rey
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.GradyMinor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE AREA:8.99± AC
RESIDENTIAL 5.36± AC
PRESERVE 1.27± AC
WATER MANAGEMENT 1.0± AC
BUFFERS/OPEN SPACE 1.36± AC
MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS:65
MAXIMUM GROUP HOUSING UNITS:200
MAXIMUM DENSITY:7 DU/AC
PRESERVE:
REQUIRED - 1.27± ACRES (8.46± ACRES NATIVE
VEGETATION X 15%)
PROVIDED - 1.27± ACRES
NOTES
1.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS
SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO
AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.
2.ALL ACREAGES, EXCEPT PRESERVE, ARE
APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION
AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LDC.
3.THE EXISTING PRESERVES WILL MEET BUFFER
REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTICS ARE REMOVED.
REVISED
03/08/2017
PDF Page 192 of 194
PDF Page 193 of 194
PDF Page 194 of 194
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the
Collier County Board of County Commissioners on November
149 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,
Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail
East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will
consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting
will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance
is as follows:
If you area person with adisability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact. the* Collier County Facilities Management Division,
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-
5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting.
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaiig
red are available
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann Jennejohn
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
October 25, 2017 No.1798675
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAAMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER2004-
419 AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE
Z
ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
to
CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY
FROM A RURAL 'AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A
vu,
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING
p
DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE CLEARY RPUD,
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 63 RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS OR 200 GROUP HOUSING UNITS FOR SENIORS
Z
ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE QUARTER MILE EAST OF LOGAN
BOULEVARD IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26
ul
EAST, CONSISTING OF 8.99± ACRES. [PUDZ-PL20160001985]
tD
A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the
Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are
invited to attend and be heard.
CL
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
p
register with the County manager prior to presentation of
the item to be Individual be
a
0
agenda addressed. speakers will
limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual
rD
to speak on behalf of anorganization or group is encouraged.
If recognized by the Chairman, aspokesperson for a group �or
N
Ln
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
N
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum
of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
W
W
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall
be
submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of
seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in
presentations before the Board will become a permanent part
of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board
will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and
therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which, record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is based.
If you area person with adisability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact. the* Collier County Facilities Management Division,
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-
5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting.
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaiig
red are available
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann Jennejohn
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
October 25, 2017 No.1798675