Loading...
Agenda 09/26/2017 Item #16G609/26/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution authorizing execution of Joint Participation Agreement Contract No. G0O51 with the Florida Department of Transportation for $80,000 for the Seaplane Base Project at Everglades Airpark, and authorize the necessary budget amendments (Project No. 33533). Fiscal Impact: $80,000 FDOT, and $20,000 County. OBJECTIVE: To accept grant funding for a Seaplane Base Project at the Everglades Airpark (X01), which aims to diversify airport operations and spur economic development within eastern Collier County. CONSIDERATIONS: On June 28, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) directed staff to pursue a Focused Environmental Assessment and potential grant funding for the establishment of a seaplane base at the Everglades Airpark (Item 16.G.3). The Collier County Airport Authority (CCAA) has received a grant offer in the amount of $80,000 from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to fund the development of a seaplane base at the Everglades Airpark. The Airport Authority has been approached by Salt Island Seaplanes of Naples with interest to build and establish a seaplane sales and maintenance facility/hangar at X01. In addition to the economic benefit of this business to the community, the airport expects a direct benefit from increased aircraft operations and fuel sales, as well as land lease rent revenue associated with the privately constructed facility. As part of prior Board direction, staff is currently pursuing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Salt Island Seaplanes, which will be brought back for consideration and approval at a future Board meeting. The CCAA has received a grant offer from FDOT in the amount of $80,000 for this project, which will fund a focused environmental assessment and preliminary design estimated to cost $100,000. The funding allocation is as follows: State Funding (FDOT) $ 80,000 Local Match $ 20,000 Total Available Funding $ 100,000 FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment is necessary to recognize FDOT grant revenue in the amount of $80,000 within Airport Grant Fund (498), Project 33533. A budget amendment in the amount of $20,000 is necessary to appropriate the local match within Airport Grant Match Fund (499), Project 33533 available via transfer from the Airport Capital Fund (496) Reserves. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this Executive Summary. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved for form and legality and requires a majority vote for Board approval. - JAB RECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to execute a Resolution authorizing execution of Florida Department of Transportation Joint Participation Agreement Co ntract No. G0O51 for $80,000, and associated budget amendments, to fund the development of a seaplane base at Everglades Airpark. Prepared by: Justin Lobb, Airports Manager, Airport Authority 16.G.6 Packet Pg. 2938 09/26/2017 ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Resolution_X01 Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (PDF) 2. 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (PDF) 3. [Linked] Seaplane Base - Feasibility Report (PDF) 16.G.6 Packet Pg. 2939 09/26/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.G.6 Doc ID: 3609 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution authorizing execution of Joint Participation Agreement Contract No. G0O51 with the Florida Department of Transportation for $80,000 for the Seaplane Base Project at Everglades Airpark, and authorize the necessary budget amendments (Project No. 33533). Fiscal Impact: $80,000 FDOT, and $20,000 County. Meeting Date: 09/26/2017 Prepared by: Title: Operations Coordinator – Airport Authority Name: Debra Brueggeman 08/11/2017 1:23 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Operations Support – Growth Management Department Name: Gene Shue 08/11/2017 1:23 PM Approved By: Review: Airport Authority Justin Lobb Additional Reviewer Completed 08/15/2017 11:59 AM Growth Management Operations Support Allison Kearns Additional Reviewer Completed 08/17/2017 3:40 PM Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Level 1 Reviewer Completed 08/17/2017 3:52 PM Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 08/18/2017 9:02 AM Growth Management Department Debra Brueggeman Department Head Review Skipped 08/11/2017 1:17 PM County Attorney's Office Jennifer Belpedio Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 08/18/2017 10:48 AM Growth Management Department James French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 08/18/2017 5:21 PM Grants Edmond Kushi Level 2 Grants Review Completed 08/22/2017 3:23 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 08/23/2017 10:10 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 08/24/2017 9:44 AM Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Completed 08/25/2017 4:05 PM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 08/29/2017 12:23 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 08/30/2017 4:33 PM Board of County Commissioners Michael Cox Meeting Completed 09/12/2017 9:00 AM 16.G.6 Packet Pg. 2940 16.G.6.a Packet Pg. 2941 Attachment: Resolution_X01 Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRAN$PORTATION JOINT PARTIGIPATION AGREEMENT 725430{16 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION O@- 06/2016 ?agcl oflT Financial Project Numbe(s): (ilim-s€gment-phass-*quence) 44't8't5-1-94-01 Fund: 010 FLAIR Category: 088719 Function: 215 Object Code:751000 Federal Number: N/A Org. Code: 55012020129 Contract Number: G0O51 DUNS Number: B0-939-7102 VendorNo,: F596000558130 CFDA Number: N/A Agency DUNS No, 07{99-7790_ CSFA Number: 55.004 Aviation CFDA Title; NIA CSFA Title: Development Grants THIS JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement'), made and entered into this day of by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of Florida, ("Department"), and Collier County A'lrport Authoritv. 2005 Mainsail Drive. Suite 1, Naples. Florida 341 '14 ("Agency''). The Department and Agency agree that all terms of this Agreement will be completed on or before June 30, 20?0 and this Agreement will expire unless a time extension is provided in accordance with Section 16.00. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Agency has the authority to enter into said Agreement and to undertake the Project hereinafter described, and the Departmenl has been granted the authority to function adequately in all areas of appropriate jurisdiction including the implementation of an integrated and balanced transportation system and is authorized under !!!jQQ, Florida Statutes, to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideralion of the mutual covenants, promises and representations herein, the parties agree as follows: 1.00 Purpose of Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the Departmenfs participation in the Seaplane Base Project at the Everglades Airpark and as further described in Exhibit "A" attached lo and incorporated into this Agreement ("Protect"), and to provide Departmental financial assistance to the Agency, state the terms and conditions upon which such assistance will be provided, and to sei forth the manner in which the Project will be undertaken and completed. 1.10 Exhibits. A, B, C & D are attached and incorporated into this Agreement. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2942 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725430{6 PUBUC TRANSPORTATION occ - 06/2016 PaEa2oflT 2.00 Accomplishment of the Project: 2.10 Generat Requirements. The Agency shall commence, and complete the Project, with all practical dispatch, in a sound, economical, and efficient manner, and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and all applicable laws' 2.20 pursuant to Federal, State, and Local Law. ln the event that any election, referendum, approval, permit, notice, or other proceeding or authorization is requisite under applicable law to enable the Agency to enter into ttris Agreement or to undertrake the Project, or to observe, assume or carry out any of the provisions of the Agreement, the Agency will initiate and consummate, as provided by law, all actions necessary with respect to any such matters so requisite. 2.30 Funds of the Agency. The Agency shall initiate and prosecute to completion all proceedings necessary, including federal aid requirements, to enable the Agency to provide the necessary funds for completion of the Project. 2.40 Submission of proceedings, Gontracts and Other Documents. The Agency shall submit to the Department such data, raports, records, contracts and other documents relating to the Project as the Department may require as listed in Exhibit "c" attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. The Department has the option to require an activity report on a quarterly basis. The activity report will include details of the progress of the Project towards completion. 3.00 Total project Cost. The total estimated cost of the Project is $100,000.00. This amount is based upon the estimate summarized in Exhibit "B" attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. The Agency agrees to bear all expenses in excess of the total estimated cost of the Project and any deficits involved. 4.00 Project Costs Participation and Eligibility: 4.10 Department participation. The Department agrees to maximum participation, including contingencies, in the project in the amount of $-go.ooo.oo as detailed in Exhibit "8", or in an amount equal to the percentage(s) of total cost shown in Exhibit "B", whichever is less' 4.11 Agency participation (Non€tate Sources). The Agency agrees to minimum participation, including contingenciei, in the Project in the amount of $20.000.00 as detailed in Exhibit "8", or in an amount equal to the percentage(s) of the total cost shown in Exhibit "B", whichever is more' 4.12 Federal Awards. The Agency, a non-federal entity, I is E is not a recipient of a federal award, as detailed in Exhibit "8.' 4.20 project Cost Eligibility, project costs eligible for State participation will be allowed only from the effective date of this Agreement. lt is understood that State participation in eligible Project costs is subject to: a) Legislative approval of the Department's appropriation request in the adopted work program year that the Project is scheduled to be committed; O1 evailaUitity of funds as stated in Section 15.00 of this Agreement; Approval of all plans, specifications, contracts or other obligating documents as required by the Department, and all other terms of this Agreement; c) Department approval of costs in excess of the approved funding or attributable to actions which have not received the required approval of the Department and all other terms of this Agreement; d) Department approval of the Project scope and budget (Exhibits *A" and "8") at the time appropriation authority becomes available. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2943 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 7254.]046 PT'IBUC TRANSPORTAflON occ - 06/2016 Psgc 3 of17 4,30 Front End Funding. Front end funding fl is I is not applicable. lf applicable, the Department may initially pay 100% of the total allowable incurred Project costs up to an amount equal to its total share of participation as shown in paragraph 4.10. 5.00 Project Budget and Payment Provisions: 5.10 The project Budget. prior to the execution of this Agreement, a Project schedule of funding shall be prepared by the Agency and approvld by the Department, The Agency shall maintain said schedule of funding, carry out the Project' and shall incur obligations against and make disbursements of Project funds only in conformity with the latest approved schedule of funding for the project, attached and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "B." The schedule of funding may be revised by execution of a Supplemental Agreement between the Department and the Agency' The ngency acknowledge, "nd "gr""s that funding for this Proiect may be reduced upon determination of the Agency's contract award amount. lf revised, a copy of 1ne Supplemental Agreement shall be forwarded to the Department's Comptroller. No increase or decrease shall be effective unless it complies with fund participation requirements of this Agreement and is approved by the Department's Comptroller. 8.20 payment Provisions. Unless othenrvise allowed, payment will begin in the year the Project or Project phase is scheduled in the work program as of the date of the Agreement. Payment will be made for actual costs incuned as of the date the invoice is submittld with the final payment due upon receipt of a final invoice. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of goods and services unless advance payments are authorized by the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida under Chapters 21s and 216, Florida Statutes. lf the Department determines that the performance of the Agency is unsatisfactory, the Department shall notify the Agency of the deficiency to be corrected, which correction shall be made within a time-fiame to be specified by the Department. The Agency shall, within sixty (60) days after notice from the Department, provide the Department wiih a conective action plan describing how the Agency will address all issues of Agreement non-performance, unacceptable performance, failure to meet the minimum performance levels, deliverable deficiencies, or Agreement non-compliance. lf the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department, the Agency shall be assessed a non-performance retainage equivalent to 10% of the total invoice amount. The retainage shall be applied to the invoice for the then-current billing period. The retainage shall be withheld until the Agency resolves the deiiciency, lf the deficiency is subsequently resolved, the Agency may bill the Department for the retained amount during the next billing period. lf the Agency is unable to resolve the deficiency, the funds retained may be forfeited at the end of the Agreement's term. 6.00 Accounting Records: 6.10 Establishment and Maintenanoo of Accounting Records. The Agency shall establish for the Project, in conformity with requirements established by Department's program guidelines/procedures and "Principles for State and Local Governments",2 CFR part22S, separato accounts to be maintained within its existing accounting system or establish independent accounts. Such accounts are referred to herein collectively as the "Project account." Records of costs incurred under terms of this Agreement shall be maintained in the Project account and made available upon request to the Department at all times during the period of this Agreement and for five (5) years after final payment is made, Copies of these documents and records shall be furnished to the Departmenl upon request. Records of costs incurred include the Agenct's general accounting records and the Project records, together with supporting documents and records, of the Agency and all sub-consultants performing work on the Project and all other records of the Agency and sub-consultants considered necessary by the Department for a proper audit of costs. lf any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the five (5) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 6.20 Costs tncurred for the project. The Agency shall charge to the Project account all eligible costs of the Project. Costs in excess of the latest approved budget or attributable to actions which have not received the required approval of the Department shall not be considered eligible costs. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2944 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 72543046 PUBUC TMNS}ORTATION mc _ 06i20t6 hgr 4 of l7 6.30 Documentation of project costs. All costs charged to the Project, including any approved services contributed by the Agency or others, sfrali be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges' 6.40 Ghecks, Orders, and Vouchers. Any check or order drawn by the Agency with respect to any item which is or will be chargeable against the project account will be drawn only in accordance with a properly signed voucher then on file in the office of the Agency stating in proper detail the purpose for which such check or order is drawn. All checks, payrolls, invoices, contracts, vouchers, orders, or other accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part to the Proiect shall be clearly identified, readily accessible, and, to the eitent feasible, kept separate and apart from all other such documents. 6.50 Audits. The administration of Federal or State resources awarded through the Department to the Agency by this Agreement may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the Department. The following requirements do not limit the authority of the Department to conduct or anange for the conduct of additional audits or evaluations of Federal awards or state financial assistance or limit the authority oi any state agency inspector general, the State of Florida Auditor General, or any other state official. The Agency shall comply with all audit and audit reporting requirements as specified below' 1. Federal Funded a) ln addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, monitoring procedures may include but not be limited to on-site visits by Department staff and/or other procedures including, reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring corrective action, and issuing ,anrgerent decisions on weaknssses found through audits when those lindings pertain to Federal awards provided through the Department by this Agreement' By entering into this Agreement, the Agency agrees to comply and cooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/pro""..u, deemed appropriati uy tne Oepartment. The Agencyfurther agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Department, State of Florida Cnief financial Officer (CFO) or State of Florida Auditor General. b) The Agency, a non-Federal entity as defined by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, as a subrecipient of a Federal award awarded by the Department through this Agreement is subject to the following reguirements: i. ln the event the Agency expends a total amount of Federal awards equal to or in excess of the threshold estaOtisneO by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements' the Agency must have a Federal single or program-specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements. Exhibit A. B. C & D to this Agreement provides the reguired Federal award identification information nieOeO by the Agency to further comply with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200' Subpart F - Audit Requirements. ln determining Federal awards expended in a fiscal year' the Agency must consider allsources of Federal awards based on when the aclivity related to the Federal award occurs, including the Federal award provided through the Department by this Agreement. The determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the guidelines established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements. An audit conducted by the State of Florida Auditor General in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, will meet the requirements of this Part. ii. ln connection with the audit requirements, the Agency shallfulfill the requirements relative to the auditee responsibilities as provided in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements' \:"j,/ 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2945 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) lii. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT ?25{3046 PUBUC TRANSPORTATION OC,C- 05n016 PrgeS oflT ln the event the Agency expends less than the threshold established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, in Federal awards, the Agency is exempt from Federal audit requirements for that fiscal year. However, the Agency must provide a single audit exemption statement to the Department at FDOTSinoleAudit@dot.state.fl.us no later than nine months after the end of the Agency's audit period for each applicable audit year. ln the event the Agency expends less than the threshold established by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit R-quirements, in Federal awards in a fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, the cost of the audit musl be paid from non-Federal resources (1.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the Agency's resour@s obtained from other than Federal entities). The Agency must electronically submit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) at httos://harvester,census.oov/facweb/ the audit reporting package as required by 2 CFR Part ZOO, SuUpart F - Audit Requirements, within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s) or nine months afier the end of the audit period. The FAC is the repository of record for audits required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements- However, the Departmenl requires a copy of the audit reporting package also be submifted to FDOTSinoleAudit@dot.state.fl.us within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the "rOit r report(s) or nine months after the end of the audit period as required by 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements. Within six months of acceptance of the audit report by the FAC, the Department will review the Agency's audit reporting package, including conective action plans and management lefters, to the extent n""esirry to determine whether timely and appropriate aclion on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the Federal award provided through the Department by this Agreement. lf the Agency fails to have an audit conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F - Audit Requirements, the Department may impose additional conditions to remedy noncompliance. lf the Department determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, the Departrnent may take appropriate actions to enforce compliance, which actions may include but not be limited to the following: 1. Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the Agency or more severe enforcement action by the Department; 2. Disallow (deny both use of funds and any applicable matching credit for) all or part of the cost of the activity or action not in compliance; Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award; lnitiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 cFR Part 180 and Federal awarding agency regulations (or in the case of the Department, recommend such a proceeding be initiated by the Federal awarding agency); Withhold further Federal awards for the Proiect or program; Take other remedies that may be legally available. As a condition of receiving this Federal award, the Agency shall permit the Department, or its designee, the CFO or State of Florida Auditor General a@ess to the Agency's records including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers and project records as nucelsary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals or litigation shall be retained until the action is complete or the dispute is resolved' tv. v. 3. 4. 5. 6. vl. :i 1 Iilri-7 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2946 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725'030{6 PIJBLIC T"ANSPORTATION @c - 06i2016 Prgc6 oflT The Department's contact information for requirements under this part is as follows: Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450 FDOTSinqleAudit(Adot.state.fl . us State Funded a) ln addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordancewith Section215.97, Florida Statutes, monitoring procedures to monitor the Agency's use of state financial assistance may include but not be limited to on- site visits by Department staff andlor other procedures including, reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring conective action, and issuing management decisions on weaknesses found through audits when those findings pertain to state financial assistance awarded through the Department by this Agreement, By entering into this Agreement, the Agency agrees to comply and c,ooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the Department' The Agency further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Department, the Department of Financial Services (DFS) or State of Florida Auditor General. b) The Agency, a nonstate entity as defined by Section 215,97(2)(m), Florida Statutes, as a recipient of state financial assistance awarded by the Department through this Agreement is subject to the following requirements: i. ln the event the Agency meets the audit threshold requirements established by Section 2j1.gl, Florida Statutes, the Agency must have a State single or proiect-specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97 , Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Department of Financial Services; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) o1t0.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General' Exhibit A. B, C & D to this Agreement indicates state financial assistance awarded through the Department by this Agreement needed by the Agency to further comply with the requirements of Section 215,97, Florida Statutes, ln determining the state financial assistance expended in a fiscal year, the Agency shall consider atl sources of state financial assistance, including state financial assistance received from the Depafiment by this Agreement, other state agencies and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass- through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements. ii. ln connection with the audit requirements, the Agency shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2Xe), Florida Stalutes, and Chapters 1O.S5O (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. iii. ln the event the Agency does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Agency is exempt for such fiscal year from the state single audit requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. However, the Agency must provide a single audil exemption statement to the Department at fpgTSinqteAudj!@dot.q_tate,fl,uq no later than nine months after the end of the Agency's audit period for each applicable audit year, ln the event the Agency does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, in a fiscal year and vl|. rl lr \ 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2947 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) tv. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725{30.06 PIJBLIC TRANSIDRTATTON ooc - 06/2015 Psgel oflT elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the Agency's resources (r.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the Agency's resources obtained from other than State entities). ln accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for- profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, copies of financial reporting packages required by this Agreement shall be submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, Florida 323994405 EOQI$i ns leAudit(Od ot,state ^fl. us And State of Florida Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 1 11 West Madison Street, Room 401 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1 450 Email : f laudfl en .lpjip lqov.t(0$qd state.{1. Us Any copies of financial reporting packages, reports or other information required to be submitted to the Department shall be submitted timely in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable. The Agency, when submltting financial reporting packages to the Department for audits done in accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 1 0.650 (nonprofit and for- profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date the reporting package was delivered to the Agency in correspondence accompanying the reporting package. Upon receipt, and within six months, the Department will review the Agency's financial reporting package, including corrective action plans and management lefters, to the extent necessary to determine whether timely and appropriate conective action on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the state financial assistance provided through the Department by this Agreement. lf the Agency fails to have an audit conducted consistent with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Departmenl may take appropriate corrective action to enforce compliance. As a condition of receiving state financial assistance, the Agency shall permit the Department, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General access to the Agency's records including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers and prolect records as necessary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals or litigation shall be retained untilthe action is complete or the dispute is resolved. v. vl. vil. vil. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2948 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANTPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725430-06 PUBUC TRANSPORTATION ooc- 062016 Ptgc t oflT 3. The Agency shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of iive years from the date the audit report is issued and shall allow the Department, or its designee, DFS or State of Florida Auditor General access to such records upon request. The Agency shall ensure thai the audit working papers are made available to the Department, or its designee, DFS or State of Florida Auditor General upon request for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued unless extended in writing bY the DePartment. 6.60 lnsurance. Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification that the Agency has and will maintain the ability to repair or reptace any project equipment or facilities in the event of loss or damage due to any accident or casualty for the useful life of such equiiment or facilities. ln the event of the loss of such equipment or facilities, the Agency shall either replace the equipment or facilities or reimburse the Department to the extent of its interest in the lost equipment or facility. The Department may waive or modify this section as appropriate. 7.00 Requisitions and PaYments: 7.10 Acgon by the Agency. ln order to obtain any Department funds, the Agency shall file with the Department of Transportation, District gne public Transportation office 801 North Broadwav Avenue. Bartow. FL, 33830, its requisition on a form or forms pr"roiu"o by the Department, and any other data pertaining to the Proiect account (as defined in Paragraph 6.10 hereof) to justify and support the payment requisitions. 7.1i Deliverables. The Agency shall provide the following quantifiable, measurable and verifiable units of deliverables as established in Exhibit ,,A.,, Each deliverable must speciiy the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating successful completion' 2.12 lnvoices. lnvoices for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre-audit and post-audit thereof, based on the quantifiable, measurable and verifiable units of deliverables as established in Exhibit ,,A.,' Deliverables must be received and accepted in writing by the Department's Project Manager prior to payments. 7.13 Supporting Documentation. Supporting documentation must establish that the deliverables were received and accepted in writing by the Department and that the required minimum level of service to be performed based on the criteria for evaluating successful completion as specified in Section 2.00 and Exhibit "A" has been met' 7.14 Travet Expenses. lnvoices for any travel expenses by the Agency shall be submitted in accordance with Section 112.061,Florida Statutes, and shail be submitted on the Department's Contractor Travel Form No.300'a00'06'The Department may establish rates lower than the maximum provided in Chapter 112.061, Florida Statutes' 7.15 Property Acqulsition. For real property acquired, submit: a) The date the Agency acquired the real property. b) A statement by the Agency certifying that the Agency has acquired said real property, and actual consideration paid for real property. c) A statement by the Agency certifying that the appraisaland acquisition of the real property together with any attendant relocation of occupants was accomplished in compliance with all federal laws, rules and procedures required by anyfederal oversight agency and with all state laws, rules and procedures that may apply to the Agency acquiring the real property. 7.20 The Department's Obligations. Subject to other provisions of this Agreement, the Department will honor requests for reimbursement to the Agency pursuant to this Agreement. However, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Department may elect by notice in writing not to make a payment if: .i' ! 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2949 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 72l430-c6 PUBLTC TRANSPORTATION occ - 06/mt6 Pagc 0 of 17 a) The Agency shall have made misrepresentation of a material nature in its application, or any supplement or amendment to its application, or with respect to any document or data furnished with its application or pursuant to this Agreement; b) There is any pending litigation with respect to the performanoe by the Agency of any of its duties or obligations which may jeopardize or adversely affect the Project, the Agreement, or payments to the Project; c) The Agency shall have taken any action pertaining to the Project which, under this Agreement, requires the approval of the Department or has made related expenditures or incurred related obligations without having been advised by the Department that same are approved; d) There has been any violation of the conflict of interest provisions contained in this Agreemenl; e) The Agency has been determined by the Department to be in default under any of the provisions of the Agreement;or 0 Any federal agency providing federal financial assistance to the Project suspends or terminates federal financial assistance to the Project. ln the event of suspension or termination of federal financial assistance, the Agency will reimburse the Department for all disallowed costs, including any and all federalfinancial assistance as detailed in Exhibit "B." 7,30 Disallowed Costs. ln determining the amount of the payment, the Department will exclude all Project costs incurred by the Agency prior to the effective date of this Agreement, after the expiration date of this Agreement, costs which are not provided for in the latest approved scope and budget for the Project, costs attributable to goods or services received under a contract or other arrangements which have not been approved by the Department, and costs invoiced prior to receipt of annual notification of fund availability. 7.40 payment Offset. lf, after Project completion, any claim is made by the Department resulting from an audit or for work or services performed pursuant to this Agreement, the Department may offset such amount from payments due for work or seruices done under any public transportation joint participation agreement which it has with the Agency owing such amount if, upon demand, payment of the amount is not made within sixty (60) days to the Department. Offsetling amounts shall not be considered a breach of contract by the Department. 8.00 Termination or Suspension of Project: 8.i0 Termination or Suspension Generally. lf the Agency abandons or, before completion, finally discontinues the Project; or for any other reason, the commencement, prosecution, or timely completion of the Project by the Agency is rendered improbable, infeasible, impossible, or illegal, the Department will, by written notice to the Agency, suspend any or all of its obligations under this Agreement until such time as the event or condition resulting in such suspension has ceased or been corrected, or the Department may terminale any or all of its obligations under this Agreement. g,11 Action Subsequent to Notice of Termination or Suspension. Upon receipt of any final termination or suspension notice under this Section 8, the Agency shall proceed promptly to carry out the actions required in such notice, which may include any or all of the following: (1) necessary action to terminate or suspend, as the case may be, Project activities and contracts and such other action as may be required or desirable to keep to the minimum the costs upon the basis of which the financing is to be computed; (2)furnish a statement of the Project activities and contracts, and other undertakings the cost of which are otherwise includable as Project costs; and, (3) remit to the Department such portion of the financing and any advance payment previously received as is determined by the Department to be due under the provisions of the Agreement. The termination or suspension shall be carried out in conformity with the latest schedule, plan, and budget as approved by the Department or upon the basis of terms and conditions imposed by the Department upon the failure of the Agency to furnish the schedule, plan, and budget within a reasonable time. The approval of a remiftance by the Agency or the closing out of federal financial participation in the Project shall not constitute a waiver of any claim which the Department may otherwise have arising out of this Agreement. ., 'ii 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2950 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) P U BLIC TRANSPORTATIO,.I JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT ?25430-06 PUBUC TMNSPORTATION o6c - 06/2016 Prgc r0 ofl7 g.12 Access to Documents and Materiats. The Department reserves the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement for refusal by the Agency, contractor, sub*ontractor, or materials vendor to comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.00 Audit and lnspection. The Agency shall permit, and shall require its contractors to permit, the Department's authorized representatives to inspecl all work, materials, payrolls, records; and to audit the books, records and accounts pertaining to the financing and development of the Project. 10.00 Contracts of the AgencY: 10.10 Third party Agreements. The Department specifically reserves the right to review and approve any and all third party contracts with respect to the project before the Agency executes or obligates itself in any manner requiring the disbursemeni of Department funds, including consultant, purchase of commodities contracts or amendments thereto. lf the Department chooses to review and approve third party contracts for this Project and the Agency fails to obtain such approval, that shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department as provided in Section 7'20(c). The Department specifically reserves unto itself the right to review the qualifications of any consultant or contractor and to approve or disapprove ihe employment of the same. lf Federal rransit Administration (FTA) funds are used in the Project, the Department must exercise the right to third party contracl review. 10.20 Procurement of Personal Property and Services: 10.21 Compliance with Consultants, Gompetitive Negotiation Act. lt is understood and agreed by the parties to this Agreement that participation by the Department in a project with an Agency, where said proiect involves a consultant contract for engineering, architecture or surueying services, is contingent on the Agency complying in full with provisions of Chapter zsi.oss, Florida Statutes, consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, the federal Brooks Act, 23 cFR 172, and 23 U.S,C. 112.. At the discretion of the Department, the Agency will involve the Department in the consultant selection process for all projects funded under this Agreement. ln all cases, the Agency's Attorney shall certify to the Department that selection has been accomptished in compliance with Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes, the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act and the federal Brooks Act' 10.22 procurement of Gommodities or Contractual Services. lt is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that participation by the Department in a project with an Agency, where said project involves the purchase of commodities or contractual services or the purchasing of capital equipment or the constructing and equipping of facilities, which includes engineering, design, and/or construction activities, where purchases or costs exceed the Threshold Amount for CATEGORY TWO per Chapter 287.017, Florida Statutes, is contingent on the Agency complying in full with the provisions of chapter 2g7.aiil, Florida statutes. The Agency's Attorney shall certify to the Department that the purchase of commodities or contractual services has been accomplished in compliance with chapter 287 '057 , Florida Statutes' lt shall be the sole responsibility of the Agency to ensure that any obligations made in accordance with this Section comply with the current threshold limits. contracts, purchase orders, task orders, construction change orders, or any other agreement that would result in exceeding the current budget contained in Exhibit "8", or that is not consistent with the pioject description and scope of services contiained in Exhibit "A" must be approved by the Department prior to Agency execution. Failure to obtain such approval, and subsequent execution of an amendment to the Agreement if required, shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by the Department as provided in Section 7.20(cl. ,t0.30 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and obligation. lt is the policy of the Department that DBE's, as defined in 4g cFR part 26, as amended, shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts finaneed in whole or in part with Department funds under this Agreement. The DBE requirements of applicable federal and state laws and regulations apply to this Agreement' The Agency and its contractors agree to ensure that DBE's have the opportunity to participate in the performance of this Agreement. ln this regard, all reiipients and contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2951 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRAN$PORTATION JOIHT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725-03&06 PI]BLIC IRANSPORTATICT{ occ -062016 Page ll oflT with applicable federal and state laws and regulations to ensure that the DBE's have the opportunity to e,ompete for and perform contracts. The Agency and its contractors and subcontractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of contracts, entered pursuant to this Agreement. 10.40 Procurement of Constructlon Services. lf the Project is procured pursuant to Chapter 255lor construction services and at the time of the competitive solicitation for the Project 50 percent or more of the cost of the Project is to be paid from state-appropriated funds, then the Agency must comply with the requirements of Section 255.099(1 ), Florida Statutes. 11.00 Restrictions, Prohibitions, Gontrols, and Labor Provisions: 11.10 Equal Employment Opportunity. ln connection with the carrying out of any project, the Agency shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age, creed, color, sex or national origin, The Agency will take affirmative action to en$ure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, age, creed, color, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Agency shall insert the foregoing provision modified only to show the particular contractual relationship in all its contracts in connection with the development or operation of the Project, except contracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials, and shall require all such contractors to insert a similar provision in all subcontracts, except subcontracts for standard commercialsupplies or raw materials. When the Project involves installation, construction, demolition, removal, site improvement, or similar work, the Agency shall post, in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment for Project work, notices to be provided by the Department setting forth the provisions of the nondiscrimination clause. 11.20 Title Vl - Civil Rights Act of 1964. Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification that the Agency will comply with all the requirements imposed by Titte Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d, et seq.), the Regulations of the Federal Department of Transportation issued thereunder, and the assurance by the Agency pursuant thereto. 1 1 .30 Title Vlll - Civil Rights Act of 1968. Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification that the Agency will comply with all the requirements imposed by Title Vlll of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.), which among other things, prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, and age. 11.40 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification that the AgencywillcomplywithalltherequirementsimposedbytheADA(42U.S.C. 12102,etseq.),theregulationsoflhefederal government issued thereunder, and the assurance by the Agency pursuant thereto. 11.50 Prohibited lnterests. The Agency shall not enter into a contract or arrangement in connection with the Project or any property included or planned to be included in the Project, with any officer, director or employee of the Agency, or any business entity of which the officer, director or employee or the officeds, director's or employee's spouse or child is an officer, partner, director, or proprietor or in which such officer, director or employee or the officer's, directois or employee's spouse or child, or any combination of them, has a material interest. "Material lnterest" means direct or indirect ownership of more than 5% of the total assets or capital stock of any business entity. The Agency shall not enter into any contract or arrangement in connection with the Project or any property included or planned to be included in the Project, with any person or entity who was represented before the a) b) 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2952 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLTC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTIC]PATION AGRETMENT 72543&ffi PI]BLIC TTANSTORTATION mc - 05/2015 Page t2 oflT Agency by any person who at any time during the immediately preceding two (2) years was an officer, director or employee of the Agency. c) The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable to any agreement between the Agency and its fiscal depositories, any agreement for utility services the rates for which are fixed or controlled by the government, or any agreement between the Agency and an agency of state government. 11.60 lnterest of Members of, or Delegates to, Congress or Legislature. No member or delegate to the Congress of the United States, or the State of Florida legislature, shall be admifted to any share or part of the Agreement or any benefit arising therefrom. 1 2.00 M iscellaneous Provisions: 12.10 Environmental Regulations. Execution of this Agreement constitutes a certification by the Agency that the Project will be carried out in conformance wilh all applicable environmental regulations including the securing of any applicable permits. The Agency will be solely responsible for any liability in the event of non+ompliance with applicable environmental regulations, including the securing of any applicable permits, and will reimburse the Department for any loss incurred in connection therewith. 12.20 Department Not Obligated to Third Parties. The Department shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any party other than the Agency. 12.30 When Rights and Remedies Not Waived. ln no event shallthe making by the Department of any payment to the Agency constitute or be construed as a waiver by the Department of any breach of covenant or any default which may then exist, on the part of the Agency, and the making of such payment by the Department while any such breach or default shall exist shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the Department with respect to such breach or default. 12.40 Severability. lf any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. ln such an instance the remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law. 12.50 Bonus or Commission. By execution of the Agreement the Agency represents that it has not paid and, also, agrees not to pay, any bonus or commission for the purpose of obtaining an approval of its application for the financing hereunder. 12.60 State or Territorial Law. Nothing in the Agreement shall require the Agency to observe or enforce compliance with any provision thereof, perform any other act or do any other thing in contravention of any applicable State law: Provided, that if any of the provisions of the Agreement violate any applicable State law, the Agency will at once notify the Department in writing in order that appropriate changes and modifications may be made by the Department and the Agency to the end that the Agency may proceed as soon as possible with the Project, 12.70 Use and Maintenance of Project Facilities and Equipment. The Agency agrees that the Project facilities and equipment will be used by the Agency to provide or support public transportation for the period of the useful life of such facilities and equipment as determined in accordance with general accounting principles and approved by the Department. The Agency further agrees to maintain the Project facilities and equipment in good working order for the useful life of said facilities or equipment. 12.71 Property Records. The Agency agrees to maintain property records, conduct physical inventories and develop control systems as required by 49 CFR Part 18, when applicable. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2953 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRAN$PORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725430{6 PUBUC TRANSPORTATION ocrc- 052016 Pige 13 oflT 12.80 Disposal of ProJect Facllitles or Equlpment. lf the Agency disposes of any Project facility or equipment during its useful life for any purpose except its replacement with like facility or equipment for public transportation use, the Agency will comply with the terms of 49 CFR Part 18 relating to property management standards. The Agency agrees to remit to the Department a proportional amount of the proceeds from the disposal of the facility or equipment. Said proportional amount shall be determined on the basis of the ratio of the Department financing of the facility or equipment as provided in this Agreement, The Agency must remit said proportional amount to the Department within one (1) year afler the official date of disposal. 't2.90 Contractual lndemnity. To the extent provided by Section 768.28, Florida Statues, the Agency shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Department and all of its officers, agents, and employees from any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge, or expense arising out of any act, error, omission, or negl(;ent act by the Agency, its agents, or employees, during the performance of the Agreement, except that neither the Agency, its agents, or its employees will be liable under this paragraph for any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge, or expense arising out of any act, error, omission, or negligent act by the Department or any of its officers, agents, or employees during the performance of the Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by the Agency of any sovereign immunity protections that may be provided by Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. When the Department receives a notice of claim for damages that may have been caused by the Agency in the performance of services required under this Agreement, the Departmentwill immediatelyfonrrard the claim to the Agency, The Agency and the Department will evaluate the claim and report their findings lo each other within fourteen (14) working days and willjointly discuss options in defending the claim. After reviewing the claim, the Department will determine whether to require the participation of the Agency in the defense of the claim or to require that the Agency defend the Department in such claim as described in this section. The Department's failure to promptly notify the Agency of a claim shall not act as a waiver of any right herein to require the participation in or defense of the claim by Agency. The Department and the Agency will each pay its own expenses for the evaluation, settlement negotiations, and trial, if any. However, if only one party participates in the defense of the claim at trial, that party is responsible for all expenses at trial. 13.00 Plans and Specifications. ln the event that this Agreement involves the purchasing of capital equipment or the constructing and equipping of facilities, where plans and specifications have been developed, the Agency shall provide an Engineer's Certification that certifies Project compliance as listed below, or in Exhibit "C" if applicable. For the plans, specifications, construction contract documents, and any and all other engineering, construction, and contractual documents produced by the Engineer, hereinafter collectively referred to as "plans", the Agency will certify that: a) All plans comply with federal, state, and professional standards as well as minimum standards established by the Department as applicable; b) The plans were developed in accordance with sound engineering and design principles, and with generally accepted professiona I standards; c) The plans are consistent with the intent of the Project as defined in Exhibits "A" and "8" of this Agreement as well as the Scope of Services; and d) The plans comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, zoning and permitting requirements, public notice requirements, and other similar regulations. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the Agency, upon request by the Department, shall provide plans and specifications to the Department for review and approvals. 14,00 Project Completion, Agency Certification. The Agency will certify in writing on or attached to the final invoice, that the Project was completed in accordance with applicable plans and specifications, is in place on the Agency facility, that adequate title is in the Agency and that the Project is accepted by the Agency as suitable for the intended purpose. {5.00 Appropriation of Funds: 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2954 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT ?25-030-06 PI'BLIC TTANSFORTATION oc€ - 064016 Page 14 ofl? 15.10 Gonfingency of payment. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annuaiappropriation by the Legislature. lf the Department's funding for this Project is in multiple fiscal years, funds approval from the Department's Comptroller musl be received each fiscal year prior to costs being incuned. See Exhibit "8" for funding levels by fiscal year. Project costs utilizing these fiscal year funds are not eligible for reimbursement if incurred prior to funds approval being received. The Department will notify the Agency, in writing' when funds are available. 15.20 Multi-year Commitment. ln the event this Agreement is in excess of $25,000 and has a term for a period of more than one (1) year, the provisions of Chapter 339.135(6Xa), Florida Statutes, are hereby incorporated: ,'The Department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its teims, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The Department shall require a statement from the comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding 1 year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years; and this paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the Department which are for an amount in excess of $25,000 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year." 16.00 Expiration of Agreement. The Agency agrees to complete the Project on or before June 30' 2020' lf the Agency does not complete tne project within this time period, this Agreement will expire unless an extension of the iime period is requested by the Agency and granted in writing by the Department prior to expiration of this Agreement. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of ttr" p.i"ct and the procedure established in section 8'00 of this Agreement shall be initiated. The cost of any work performed after the expiration date of this Agreement will not be reimbursed by the DePartment- 16.10 Final lnvoice. The Agency must submit the final invoice on this Project to the Department within 120 days after the expiration of this Agreement' 17.00 Agreement Format. All words used in rhis Agreement in the singular form shall extend to and include the plural' All words used in the plural form shall extend to and include the singular. Allwords used in any gender shall extend to and include all genders. 1g.00 Execution of Agreement. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in a minimum of two counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same instrument. 19.00 Restrictions on LobbYing: 19.i0 Federal. The Agency agrees that no federally-appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by or on behalf of the Agency, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2955 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRAN$PORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 725-010..06 PIJBUC TMNSPORTATION ooc - 0620t6 Pag. 15 of I 7 lf any funds other than federally-appropriated funds have been paid by the Agency to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accnrdance with its instructions. The Agency shall require that the language of this section be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 1g.20 State. No funds received pursuant to this Agreement may be expended for lobbying the Legislature, the.iudicial branch or a state agency. 20.00 Vendors Rights. The Agency providing goods and services to the Department should be aware of the following time frames: a) The Department has 20 days to deliver a request for payment (voucher) to DFS, The 20 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the date the goods or services are received, inspected, and approved. Approval and inspection of goods or services shall take no longer than 20 days following the receipt of a complete and accurate invoice, b) lf a payment is not available within 40 days, then a separate interest penalty at a rate established pursuant to Secfion 55.03(1), Florida S(atufes, will be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount, to the Agency. The 40 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the date the goods or seryices are received, inspected, and approved. lnterest penalties of less than one (1) dollar will not be enforced unless the Agency requests payment, lnvoices that have to be returned to the Agency because of Agency preparation enors will result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the Department. A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within DFS. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for Agencies who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from the Department. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 413- 5516. 21.00 Restrictiong, Prohibits, Controls, and Labor Provisions. During the performance of this Agreement, the Agency agrees as follows, and shall require the following provisions to be included in each contract and subcontract entered into pursuant to this Agreement: a) A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submil bids on leases of real property to a public enti$, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contracl with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. b) ln accordance with Section 287.134, Florida Statutes, an entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or servlces to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transacl business with any public entity. 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2956 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT ?25-03G06 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION occ -062016 Psgc 16 oflT c) An entity or affiliate who has had its Certificate of Qualification suspended, revoked, denied or have further been determined by the Department to be a non-responsible coniractor may not submit a bid or perform work for the construction or iepair of a public building or public work on a contract with the Agency' d) Neither the Agency nor any of its contractors or their subcontractors shall enter into any contract,.subcontract or arrangemJnt in conneition with the Project or any property included or.planned to be included in the project in wnicn iny ,uru"r, officei or uriiloy"u ot irrb n'genly or the-locality during tenure or for two (2) years thereafter has any interest, direct or indirect. lf any such present or former member, officer or employee involuntarily acquires oi n"O acquired prior to the beginning oi tenure any such interest' and if such interest is immediatety jts"ioreO to tne Agenct, the AgencyJwith prior approval of the Department, may waive the prohibition contained in this paragrapn'proviO;d that any'such present membet, officer or employee shall not participate in any action by the Agency or the locality relating to such contract, subcontract or ,rrrng"rn"ni.-fn" A6"ncy shaliinsert in all contracts entered into in connection with the Proiect or any property included or planned to be included in any Project, and shall require its contractors to insert in each of their subcontracts' the following provision: ,'No member, officer or employee of the Agency or of the locality during.his tenure or for 2 years thereaftershall have any ii',teiest, direct ir indirect, in lhis contract or the proceeds thereof." The provisions of this paragraph shall not be applicable to any agreement between the Agency and its fiscal depositories or to any rgr"rrn"niior utility'services the iates for which are fixed or controlled by a governmental agencY' 23.00 Employment Eligibility (Uslng E'Verify). AgencyA/endors/Contractors: a) Shalt utitize the U.S. Department of Homeland Securi$s E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Agency during the term of the Agreement; and b) Shall expressly require any contractors and subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the Agreement to likewise utilize the u.s. Depalrment of Homeland security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the contractor or subcontractor during the Agreement term. 24.00 lnspector General Cooperation. The Parties agree to comply with Section 20.055(5), Florida Statutes, and to incorporat,e in all subcontracts the obligation to comply with section 20-055(5), Florida statutes' 25.00 Maintenance of project. The Agency agrees to maintain any project not on the State Highway Slatem constructed under this Agreement. 26.00 Federal Grant Number. lf the Federal grant number is not available prior to execution of the Agreement, the Department may unilaterally add the Federal irant numoer to the Agreement without approval of the Agency and without an amendment to tne-Agreement. lf this occurs, an updated-Agreement that includes the Federal grant number wi1 be provided to tne ngency alio uptoaoec to ttre oepartment of Finincial Services' Florida Accountability Gontract Tracking System (FACTS). 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2957 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT the parties hereto have caused these presents be executed,the day 725410{6 PUBUC T&II.ISPORT TIO.I occ - 0d2016 Prgc 17 oftT and year first aboveIN WITNESS WHEREOF, written. AGENCY Collier County Airport Authority DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAIION John M. Kubler, P.E. TlTt"E Director of Transportation Deryelopment LEGAL RTVIEW OEPARTMENT OFTMNSPORIANON See attached Encumbrance Form for date of Funding Approval by Comptroller AGENCY HAME SIGNATORY (PRINTED OR TYPED),/L/, fh/rt SlGNATURE Approved as to tbrm antl lcgalitY AT-TEST DwtcHT E. BROCK Chrt By: o\' ,,,i-\ !"Pt 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2958 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 I I 5-1 -94-0 I Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement EXHIBIT *A' PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND RESPONSIBILITIES This exhibit forms an integral part of that certain Joint Participation Agreerrent between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and the Collier County Airport Authorit-v. 2005 Mainsail Drive. Suite l. Naples. Flodda 34114 referenced by the above Financial Project Number. PROJECT LOCATION: Everglades Airpark PROJECT DESCRIPI'ION: Seaplane Base SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS BY AGENCY: The audit report(s) required in paragraph 6.50 of the Agreement shall include a schedule of project assistance that will reflect the Department's contract number, Financial Project Number and the Federal Identification number, where applicable and the amount of state funding action (receipt and disbursement of funds) and any federal or local funding action and the funding action from any other source with respect to the project' The plans and specifications review required in paragraph 13.00 of the Agreement shall include an Engineer Certification and compliance with Departrnent requirements as outlined in Exhibit ,,ctr. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Vendor shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Vendor in conjunction with this Agreement. Specifically, if the Vendor is acting on behalf of a public agency the Vendor shall:(t) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the Department in order to perform the services being performed by the Vendor. (2) Provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the Department would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in chapter 119, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law. (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exernpt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law. (4) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the Department all public records in possession of the Vendor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public l<i\-!..' Exhibit An Page 1 of 4 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2959 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 44181 5 -1 -94-01 ContractNumber: G0O5l Original Agreement records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the Departrnent in a format that is compatible with the information technology systerns of the Department. Failure by the Vendor to'grant such public access shall be grounds for immediate unilateral cancellation of this Agreernent by the Department. The Vendor shall promptly provide the Deparbnent with a copy of any request to inspect or copy public records in possession of the Vendor and shall promptly provide the Department a copy of the Vendor's response to each such request. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS BY DEPARTMENT: Effective July I , 2070, Section 215.971 of the Florida Statutes, requires agreements with the State to contain a scope of work that clearly establishes quantifiable and measurable deliverables. Each deliverable must specify the required level of service to be performed and the Department's criteria for evaluating successful completion. The items must be submitted and approved through the Florida Aviation Database http://www.florida-aviation-database.corn/ filed under the appropriate Finansial Management (fM) number to meet the deliverable requiremeuts. The deiiverables must be received and accepted by the Department prior to the payment of services. The Department of Financial Services Internet link below provides guidance on clear and "o*preli"rsive scopes and deliverables development. The scope of work and deliverables are specifically addressed in chapter 3: http:/liwtyr.v.m]rflor:id4.qlo.gpr1r/aatlirlclocs,/ContractandGrantManagornentlJserCuide.pdf Phased Airport Project: An Aviation Development Project already under a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA), where additional funding may be allocated or project funding shares revised by the Department in subsequent fiscal years or Work Program Development cycles up to the allowed maximum Department share fbr the final project cost' Narrative The purpose of this project is to corrriuct an environtnental assesslrlellt, design, pennit. and constntct a seaplane ralrp, assocjated taxiway extension, and landing m'ea in the waters adjacent to the l}'erglades Airpark. 'I'he Airyort Authority \ryas approachcd bv Salt Island Seaplanes of Naples with their inlcntion to cstablish a (privately l'unded) seaplane salcs and rnaintenance facilitylhangar at the Everglades Airpark. In adclition to the cconmnic benelit of this business expansion in an er:onorrically tlistressed community, tlie airpo( lvill likely scc the djrect linancial bene{it of increased aircraft operations and ftiel sales frotn Justification i'l F.xhibit A, Page 2 of 4 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2960 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport AuthoritY Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 1 5-1 -94-01 ContractNumber: G0O5l Original Agreement other seaplane operators. Given the geographic location of'the airport and distance fiom other seaplane lbcilities in the state, the cotrstruction of a seaplane base rvill have a positive effect on the airport and comrnunity o1' Everglades City. Desiqn Phase l. The Agency must submit a signed copy of an agreement between the Agency and its third-party consultant, incorporating the scope of services and schedule of values which have been approved by the Department. The scope of services must include or incorporate by reference a schedule of values that will be used to approve payments to the third-party consultant. The scope of seryices and schedule of values must be approved in writing by the Department before the Agency enters into an agreement with its third-party consultant. The schedule of values shall be a complete and detailed itemization describing each subcategory of work and related pay items and their associated total value, quantity, unit of measurement and unit price/cost. The consultant should invoice the Agency on a regular basis using the approved schedule of values and one of the following methods: a. Percentage Completed, For this method the consultant's invoice should list a detailed description of each task in the approved scope of services and schedule of values, the dollar value amount for the item, the percentage competed for the item, and the dollar value for the percentage completed. b. Completed Tasks, For this method the consultant's invoice should list a detailed description ofeach task in the approved scope ofservices and schedule ofvalues, the doliar value amount for each item, indicate which task have been completed, and the dollar value for each task completed, 2. The Agency shall sign each invoice submitted to the Department and certifo thereon that the Agency has verified that the percentages of and/or task completions are correct and that the amounts indicated on the invoice are correct. 3. Any change(s) to the approved scope of services or schedule of values will require a change order approved by the Departrnent, and signed by the Agency and the third' party consultant, Invoices incorporating unapproved changes cannot be submitted by the Agency or paid by the Deparbnent. Invoices submitted to the Department with any unapproved charges will be rejected by the Departrnent. Exhibit A, Page 3 of 4 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2961 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-l -94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement Qonstruction Phase 4. The Agency must submit a signed copy of an agreement between the Agency and its contractor, incorporating the scope of services and schedule of values which have been approved by the Department. The scope of services must include or incorporate by reference a schedule of values that will be used to approve payments to the contractor. The scope of services and schedule of values must be approved in writing by the Department before the Agency enters into an agreement with its contractor. The schedule of values shall be a complete and detailed itemization describing each subcategory of work and related pay items and their associated total value, quantity, unit of measurement and unit price/cost. The contractor should invoice the Agency on a regular basis using the approved schedule of values and one of the following methods: a. Percentage Completed. For this method the contractor's invoice should list a detailed description ofeach task in the approved scope ofservices and schedule of values, the dollar value amount for the item, the percentage competed for the item, and the dollar value for the percentage completed. b. Completed Tasks. For this method the contractor's invoice should list a detailed description of each task in the approved scope of services and schedule of values, the dollar value amount for each item, indicate which task have been completed, and the dollar value for each task completed. 5. The contractor should submit their pay request to the Agency's project inspector for approval using the standard "Application and Certificate for Payment" form. The Agency's project inspector will review and approve the contractor's pay request certifying the percentage of completion and/or quantities are correct. 6. The Agarcy shall sign each invoice submitted to the Department and certifu thereon that the Agency has verified that the percentages of and/or task completions are correct and that the amounts indicated on the invoice are correct. 7 . Any change(s) to the approved scope of services or schedule of values will require a change order approved by the Department, and signed by the Agency and the contractor. Invoices incorporating unapproved changes cannot be submitted by the Agency or paid by the Department. lnvoices submitted to the Department with any unapproved charges will be rejocted by the Department. Exhibit A, Page 4 of.4 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2962 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) State Funding (DPTO) Local Fundine (LF) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-l-94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement EXHIBIT (8,' PROJECT BUDGET This exhibit forms an integral part of that certain Joint Parlicipation Agreernent between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and the Collier County Airport Authority. 2005 Mainsail Drjve. Suite 1_. Naples. Florida 34114 referenced by the above Financial Project Number. Expiration Date:June 30,2020 Project funds are programmed in the Department's Work Program in the following fiscal year(s): Total F'r 2018 $ 80,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $100,000.00 Project years may be advanced or deferred subject to Legislative appropriation or availability of funds. State funds programmed on this project must be expended by the expiration date and an invoice for their reimbursement to the agency submitted to the Deparknent within 120 days of the expiration date. Funds that become five years old prior to the expiration of the agreement will not be retained in the Deparhnents Work Program. Any expenditures not invoiced for reimbursement prior to May tst of the fifth year of such frrnds will be forfeited by the agency. It is expected that work will begin within 90 days of the execution date of this agreement and invoicing shall occur at a minimum of every 12 months to avoid project deletion. il Exhibit B, Page I of I 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2963 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Financiar proj ect *,",r3]XTlitff lffifr f ContractNumber: G0O5l Original Agreement EXHIBIT ''C'' AYIATION PROJECT REQUIREMENTS & PROGRAM ASSURANCES This exhibit forms an integral part of that certain Joint Participation Agreernent between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and the Collie.r County Airport Authority. 2005 Mainsail Drive. Suite l" Naples. Florida 34114 referenced by the above Financiai Project Number. A. General l. The assurances herein shall form an integral part of the Joint Participation Agreement (Agreement) between the State of Florida, Deparbnent of Transportation @epartment) and the airport sponsor, whether county or municipal government body or special disffict, such as an Airport Authority (herein, collectively referred to as "Agency"). 2. These assurances delineate the obligations of the parties to this Agreement to ensure their commitment and compliance with specific provisions of Exhibit A, 'oProject Description and Responsibilities" and Exhibit B, "Project Budget", as well as serving to protect public investment in public-use airports and the continued viability of the Florida Aviation System. 3, The Agency shall comply with the assurances as specified in this Agreement. 4. The terms and assurances of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of a facility developed; equipment acquired; or project iterns installed within a facility for an airport development or noise compatibility program pdect, but shall not exceed 20 years frorn the effective date of this Agreement. 5. There shall be no limit on the duration on the terms and assurances of this Agreement regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the property is used as a public airport. 6, There shall be no limit on the duration of the terms and assuraoces of this Agreement with respect to real property acquired with funds provided by the State of Florida. 7, Subject to appropriations, the Department shall continue to comply with its financial comrnitment to this project under the terms of this Agreement, until such tirne as the Department may determine that the Agency has failed to comply with the terms of the Agreement and/or these assurances. 8. An Agency that has been determined by the Department to have failed to comply with the terms of the Agreement and/or these assurances shall be notified, in writing, by the Department, identifying the specifics of the non-compliance and any corrective action by the Agency to remedy the failure. 9. Failure by the Agency to satisfactorily reinedy the non-compliance shall absolve the Department's continued financial commiffnent to this project and immediately require the Exhibit C, I'age I of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2964 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Financ ial Proj ect *r,ro3r]?f l1tl ffifr i Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement Agency to repay the Department the full amount of funds expended by the Departrnent on this project. 10. Any history of failure to comply with the tenns of an Agreement and/or assurances will jeopardize the Agency's eligibility for further state funding of airport projects by the Department. B. Agency Compliance Certification 1, General Certification: The Agency hereby certifies, with respect to this prqect, it will comply, within its authority, with all applicable, current laws and rules of the State of Florida and local government, as well as Department policies, guidelines, and requirements, including but not limited to the following (latest version of each document): a. Florida Statutes (F.S.) r Chapter 163, F.S., Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development o Chapter 329, F.S., Aircraft: Title; Liens; Registration; Liens r Chapter 330, F.S., Regulation of Aircraft, Pilots, and Airports e Chapter 331, F.S., Aviation and Aerospace Facilities and Commerce r Chapter 332, F.S., Airports and Other Air Navigation Facilities e Chapter 333, F.S., Airport 7*rung b. Florida Administrative Code (FAC) . Chapter 73C-41, FAC, Goveming the Procedure for the Submittal and Review of Local Covernment Comprehensive Plans and Amendments o Chapter 14-60, FAC, Airport Licensing Registration, and Airspace Protection e Section 62-256.300(5) FAC, Open Burning, Prohibitions, Public Airports o Section 62-701.320(13), FAC, Solid Waste Management, Permitting, Airport Safety c. Local Government Requirements e Airport Zonrngordinance . Local Comprehensive Plan d. Department Requirements . Eight Steps to Building a New Airport o Florida Airport Revenue Use Guide f,:][,-.\' '\)l Exhibit C, Page 2 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2965 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Proj ect Number: 441 8 I 5- I -94-0 I Contract Number: G0O5l Original Agreement r Florida Aviation Project Handbook o Guidebook for Airport Master Planning r Airport Compatible Land Use Guidebook 2. Construction Certification: The Agency hereby certifies, with respect to a construction-related project, that all design plans and specifications will comply with applicable federal, state, local, and professional standards, as well as Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circulars (AC's) and FAA issued waivers thereto, including hut not limited to the following: a. FederalRequirements o FAA AC70l'1460-1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting . FA.r{ AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design o FAA AC l5Alfi70-2, Operational Safety on Airports During Construction . Ftu{ AC 150/5370-10, Standards for Specifuing Construction of Airports b, Local Government Requirements o Local Building Codes r Local Zoning Codes c. DepartmentRequirements o Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (Commonly Referred to as the "Florida Green Book") r Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices r Section 1,4-60.A07, Florida Administrative Code, "Airfield Standards for Licensed Airports" r Standard Specifications for Construction of General Aviation Airports o Design Guidelines & Minimum Standard Requirements for'I-Hangar Projects 3. Land Acquisition Certification: The Agency hereby certifies, regarding land acquisition, that it will comply with applicable fbderal and state policios, regulations, and laws, including but not limited to the following: a. FederalRequirements r Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 l:'\ fl:i) Exhibit C, Page 3 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2966 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) C. Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-l -94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement e National Environmental Policy of 1969 o FAA Order 5050.4, National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Instructions for Airport Projects I FAA Order 5100.378, Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for Airport Projects b. FloridaRequirements r Chapter 73, F.S., Eminent Domain (re: Property Acquired Through Condemnation) r Chapter 74, F.S., Proceedings Supplemental to Eminent Domain (re: Condemnation) o Section 286.23, F.S., Public Business: Miscellaneous Provisions Agency Authority l. Legal Authority: The Agency hereby certifies, with respect to this project Agreement, that it has the legal authority to enter into this Agreement and commit to this project; that a resolution, motion, or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an olacial act of the airport sponsor's goveming body authorizing this Agreement, including assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the governing body to act on its behalf with respect to this Agreement and to provide any additional information as may be required. 2. Financial Authority: The Agency hereby certifies, with respect to this project Agreement, that it has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project costs which are not paid by the U.S. Government or the State of Florida; that it has sufficient funds available to assure future operation and maintenance of items funded by this project, which it will control; and that authority has been granted by the airport sponsor governing body to commit those funds to this project. Agency Responsibilities The Agency hereby certifies it currently complies with or will comply with the following responsibilities: l. Accounting System a. il'lre Agency shall create and maintain a separate account to document all of the financial transactions related to the airport as a distinct entity. b. The accounting records shall be kept by the Agency or its authorized representative in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and in an accotrnting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the 2 CFR Paft 200, Uniform D. Exhibit C, Page 4 of 15 l'i"l 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2967 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) J. Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8l 5-1 -94-01 ContractNumber: G0O5l Original Agreement Administrative Requirernents, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirernents for Federal Awards and Section 215.97, F.S., Florida Single Audit Act. c. The Department has the right to audit and inspect all financial records of the airport upon rea{ionable notice. 2. Good Title a. The Agency holds good title, satisfactory to the Department, to the airport or site thereof, or gives assurance, satisfactory to the Deparfrnent, that good title will be obtained. b. For noise compatibility program projects undertaken on the airport sponsor's property, the Agency holds good title, satisfactory to the Department, to that portion of the property upon which state funds will be expended, or gives assurance, satisfactory to the Departme,nt, that good title will be obtained. Preserving Rights and Powers a. The Agency will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms and assurances of this Agreernent without the written approval of the Department. Further, it will act promptly to acguire, extinguish, or modiff, in a manner acceptable to the Department, any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the Agency. b. If an anangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any entity or person other than the Agency or an anployee of the Agency, the Agency will reserve sufficient rights and authority to ensure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance with the terms and assurarces of this Agreement. Hazard Removal and Mitigation a. For aiqport hazards located on airport controlled propefiy, the Agency will clear and protect terminal airspace required for instrument and visual operations at the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards. b. For airport hazards not located on airport controlled property, the Agency will work in conjunction with the governing public authority or private land owner of the property to clear and protect terminal airspace required for instrument and visual operations at the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards. The Agency rnay enter into an agreement with surrounding property owners or pursue available legal remedies to remove potential hazards to air navigation. 4. .;i ''t r'i ,l'\-.":r Exhibit C, Page 5 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2968 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) 5. Collier County Collier County Airport Authority Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 81 5-1 -94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement Airport Compatible Land Use a. The Agency assures that appropriate airport zoningordinances are in place consistent with Section 333.03, F.S., "Airport Zoning", or if not in place, that it will taks appropriate action necessary to ensure local govemment adoption of an airport zoning ordinance or interlocal agreement with another local goveroment body having an airport zoning ordinance, consistent with the provisions of Section 333.03, F.S. b. The Agency assures that it will disapprove or oppose any attempted alteration or creation of objects, natural or man-made, dangerous to navigable airspace or that would adversely affect the current or future levels of airport operations. c. The Agency assures that it will disapprove or oppose any attempted change in local land use developmant regulations that would adversely affect the curent or future levels of airport operations by creation or expansion of airport incompatible land use areas. Consistency with Local Government Plans a. The Agency assuras the project is consistent with the currently existing and planned future land use development plans approved by the local govemment having jurisdictional responsibility for the area surrounding the airport. b. The Agency assures that it has given fair consideration to the interest of local communities and has had reasonable consultation with those parties affected by the project. c, The Agency will consider and take appropriate actions, if deemed warranted, to adopt the current, approved Airport Master Plan into the local govemment comprehensive plan. 7. Consistency with Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout PIan a. The Agency assures that any project, covered by the terms and assurances of this Agreement, is consistent with the current, approved Airport Master Plan. b. The Agency assures that this project, covered by the terms and assurances of this Agreement, is consistent with the current, approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP), which shows: (1) The boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the Agency for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto; (2) The location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars, and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities; and (3) The location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas on airport property and of all existing improvements thereon. 6. Exhibit C, Page 6 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2969 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) corlier county d:f X.,:f#f Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-1 -94-01 Contract Number:G0O5l Original Agreement c. The Agency assures that it will not make or permit any changes or alterations on the airport or any of its facilities that are not consistent with the Airport Master Plan and the Airport Layout Plan, as approved by the Department. d. Origmal Airport Master Plans and Airport Layout Plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof shall be subject to the approval of the Department. 8. Airport Financial Plan a. The Agency assures that it will develop and maintain a cost-feasible financial plan to accomplish the projects necessary to achieve the proposed airport improvements identified in the Airport Master Plan and depicted in the Airport Layout Plan, and any updates thereto. (1) The financial plan shall be a part of the Airport Master Plan. (2) The financial plan shall realistically assess project phasing considering availability of state and local funding and likelihood of federal funding under the FAu{'s priority system. (3) The financial plan shall not include Department funding for projects which are incousistent with the local govemment comprehensive plan. b, All project cost estimates contained in the financial plan shall be entered into and kept current in the Florida Aviation Database (FAD) Joint Automated Capital [rnprovernent Program (JACIP) website. 9. Airport Revenue The Agency assures that all revenue generated by the airport will be expended for capital improvement or operating costs of the airport; the local airport systern; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport and which are directly and substantially related to the air transportation ofpassengers or property, or for environmental or noise mitigation purposes on or off the airport. 10. Fee and Rental Structure a. The Agency assures that it will maintain a fee and rental structure for facilities and services at the airport that will make the airport as self-sustaining as possible under the circumstances existing at the particular airport. b. If this Agreement results in a facility that will be leased or otherwise produce revenue, the Agency assures that the price charged for that facility will be based on the rnarket value. I l. Pubtic-Private Partnership for Aeronautical Uses a. If the airport owner or operator and a person or entity that owns an aircraft or an airport tenant or potential tenant agree that an aircraft hangar or tenant-specific facility, Exhibit C, Page 7 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2970 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) c o r r ier c ounty "#:f Xr:rr"Hll Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 15-1 -94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement respectively, is to be constructed on airport property for aircraft storage or tenant use at the expense of the aircraft owner or tenant, the airport owner or operator may grant to the aircraft owner or tenant of the facility a lease that is subject to such terms and conditions on the facility as the airport owner or operator may impose, subject to approval by the Department. b. The price charged for said lease will be based on market value, unless otherwise approved by the Deparhnent. 1 2. Economic Nondiscrimination a. The Agency assures that it will make the airport available as an airport for public use on reasonable terms without unjust discrimination to all types, kinds and classes of aeronautical activities, including commercial aeronautical activities offering services to the public. (l) The sponsor may establish such reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, conditions to be met by all users of the airport as may be necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the airport. (2) The sponsor may prohibit or limit any given type, kind or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessary for the safe operation of the airport or necessary to serve the civil aviation needs of the public. b. The Agency assures that each airport Fixed-Based Operator (FBO) shall be subject to the same rates, fees, rentals, and other charges as are uniformly applicable to all other FBOs making the same or sirnilar uses of such airport and utilizing the same or similar facilities. 13. Air and Water Quatity Standards The Agency assures that in projects involving airport location, major runway extension, or runway location that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable air and water quality standards. 14. Operations and Maintenance a. The Agency assures that the airport and all facilities, which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable federal and state agencies for maintenance and operation, as well as minirnum standards established by the Department for State of Florida licensing as a public-use airport. (1) The Agency assures that it will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. Exhibit C, Page 8 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2971 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) corier county d:flrffi;& F inancial Proj ect *r*o3r', "#111? ltrfr f Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement (2) Except in emergency situations, any proposal to ternporarily close the airport for non-aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Department. (3) The Agency assures that it will have ilrangements for promptly notifuing airmen of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport. b. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when adverse weather conditions interfere with safe airport operations. 15. Federal Funding Eligibility a. The Agency assures it will take appropriate actions to maintain federal funding eligibility for the airport and it will avoid any action that renders the airport ineligible for federal firnding. b. Ineligibility for federal funding of airport projects will render the Agency ineligible for state funding of airport projects. 1 6. Project Implementation a. The Agency assures that it will begin making expenditures or incurring obligations pertaining to this airport project within one year after the effective date of this Agreement. b. The Agency may request a one-year extension of this one-year time period, subject to approval by the Deparhnent Dishict Secretary or designee. c. Failure of the Ageircy to make expenditures, incur obligations or receive an approved extension may allow the Deparlment to terminate this Agreernent. 17. Exclusive Rights The Agency assures that it will not permit any exclusive right for use of the airport by any person providing, or intending to provide, aeronautical services to the public. 18. Airfield Access a. The Agency assures that il will not grant or allow general easement or public access that opens onto or crosses the airport runways, taxiways, flight line, passenger facilities, or any area used for emergency equipment, fuel, supplies, passengers, mail and freight, radar, communications, utilities, and laoding systems, including but not limited to flight operations, ground services, emergency services, terminal facilities, maintenance, repair, or storage, except for those normal airport providers responsible for standard airport daily services or during special events at the airport open to the public with limited and controlled access. Exhibit C, Page 9 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2972 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-1 -94-01 Contract Number: G0O51 Original Agreement b. The Agency as$ues that it will not grant or allow general easem€,nt or public access to any portion of the airfield from adjacent real property which is not owned, operated, or otherwise controlled by the Agency without prior Deparhnent approval. 19. Retention of Rights and Interests The agency will not sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise transfer or dispose of any part of its title or other interests in the real property shown as airport owned or controlled on the current airport layout plan without prior written approval by the Department. It will not sell, lease, encumber, taminate, waive, or other-wise transfer or dispose of any part of its title, rights, or other interest in existing noise easeme,nts or avigation easeme,nts on any property, airport or non airport, without prior written approval by the Departrnent. These assurances shall not limit the Agency's right to lease airport property for airport- compatible puposes. 20. Consultant Contractor, Scope, and Costs a. The Departrnent has the right to disapprove the Agency's employment of consultants, contactors, and subconhactors for all or any part of this project if the specific consultants, contractors, or subconffactors have a record of poor project performance with the Department. b. Further, the Department maintains the right to disapprove the proposed project scope and cost ofprofbssional services, 21. Planning Proiects For all planning projects or other aviation studies, the Agency assures that it will: a. Execute the project per the approved project narrative or with approved modifications. b. Furnish the Deparhnent with such periodic project and work activity reports as indicated in the approved scope of services. c. Make such material available for public review, unless exernpt from public disclosure. (l) Information related to airport security is considered restricted infonnation and is exempt from public dissemination per Sections 119.071(3) arrd 331.22 Florida Statutes. (2) No material prepared under this Agreement shall be subject to copynght in the United States or any other country. d. Grant the Departnent uffestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in connection with this Agreement. Exhibit C, Page l0 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2973 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades AirPark Financial Project Number: 441 I 1 5-1 -94{ i ContractNumber: G0O51 Original Agreement e. If the project involves developing an Airport Master Plan or an Airport Layout Plan, and any upaates thereto, it will be consistent with provisions of the Florida Aviation Systern Plan, will identify reasonable future growth of the airport and the Agency will comply with the Department airport master planning guidebook, including: (l) Provide copies, in electronic and editable format, of final project materials to the Department, including computer-aided drafting (CAD) files of the Airport Layout Plan. (2) Develop a cost-feasible financial Plan, ap,proved by the Department, to accomplish the projects described in the Airport Master Plan or depicted in the Airport Layout Plan, and any updates thereto. The cost-feasible {inancial plan shall realistically assess project phasing considering availability of state and local funding and federal funding under the FAA's priority system. (3) Enter all projects contained in the cost-feasible plan in the Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program (JACIP). f. The Agency understands and agrees that Departrnent approval of this project Agreement or any planning material developed as part of this Agreement does not consfitute or imply any assurance or corrmihnent on the part of the Department to approve any pending or future application for state aviation funding. g. The Agency will submit master planning draft and final deliverables for Department ioa, it.rq-"ir*a, FAA approval prior to submitting any invoices to the Department for payment, h. The Departrnent may extend the 5-day requirement for the approval and inglection of goods and services to ailow for adequate time for review (reference Section 215.422(l)' F.s.). 22. Land Acquisition Proiects For the purchase of real property, the Agency assures that it will: a. Laws: Acquire the land in accordance with federal and state laws governing such action. b. Administration: Maintain direct control of project administration, including: (l) Maintain responsibility for all related contract letting and administrative procedures. (2) Secure written Department approval to execute each agreernent for the purchase of real property with any third party. (3) Ensure a qualified, State certified general appraiser provides all necessary services and documentation. Exhibit C, Page 11 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2974 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades AirPark Financial Project Number: 441 8 1 5-1 -94'01 Contract Number: G0O5l Original Agree,ment (4) Furnish the Department with a projected schedule of events and a cash flow projection within 2d calendar days after completion of the review appraisal' (5) Establish a project acc,ount for the purchase of the land' (6) Collect and disburse federal, state, and local project funds' c. Reimbursable Funds: If funding conveyed by this Agreement is reimbursable for land purchase in accordance with Chapter 332, Florida Statutes, the Agency will comply with the following requirernents: (l) The Agency shall apply for a FAA Airport Improvernent Program grant for the land purchase within 60 days of executing this Agreement' (2) if federal funds are received for the land purchase, the Agency shall notifu the bepartment, in writing, within 14 calendar days of receiving the federal funds and is responsible-for reimbursing the Deparhnent within 30 calendar days to achieve normal project federal, stale, and local funding shares per Chapter 332, Florida Statutes. (3) lf federal funds are not received for the land purchase, the Agency shall reimburse in* O"purn r*t within 30 cale,lrdar days after the reimbursable funds are due in order to achieve normal project state and local funding shares as described in Chapter 332, Florida Statutes. (4) If federal funds are not received for the land purchase and the state share of the purchase is less than or equal to normal state and local funding shares per Chapter i32, F.S., when reimbursable funds are due, no reimbursement to the Department shall be required. d. New Airport: If this project involves the purchase of real property for the development of u n"w airport, the Agency assures that it will: (1) Apply for federal and state funding to construct a paved rulway,- associated uiigrut iarking apron, and connecting taxiway within one year of the date of land purchase. (2) Complete an Airport Master Plan within two years of land purchase. (3) Complete airport construction for basic operation within 10 years of land purchase. e. Use of Land: The Agency assures that it shall use the land for aviation purposes in accordance with the terms and assurances of this Agreement within l0 years of acquisition. f. Disposat of Land: For the disposal of real property the Agency assures that it will comply with ttre following: Exhibit C, Page 12 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2975 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier County Collier County AirPort AuthoritY Everglades Airpark Financial Project Number: 441 8 1 5-1 -94-0 1 Contract Number: G0O5l Original Agreement (1) For land purchased for airport development or noise compatibility purposes, the Agency will, when the land is no longer needed for zuch purposes, dispose of such Iand at fair market value and/or make available to the Department an amount equal to the state's proportionate share of its market value. (2) Land shall be considered to be needed for airport purposes under this assurance if: (a) It serves aeronautical purposes, e.g. runway protection zone or as a noise buffer. (b) Revenue from uses of such land contributes to airport financial self- sufficiency. (3) Disposition of land under Section 22f(l) or (2), above, shall be subject to retention or reservation of any interest or right therein needed to ensure such land will only be used for purposes compatible with noise levels related to airport operations. (4) Revenues from the sale of suoh land must be accounted for as outlined in Section D,2., and expended as outlined in Section D.9' (5) For disposal of real property purchased with Departrnent funding: (a) The Agency will reimburse the Deparfinent a proportional amount of the proceeds of the sale of any airport-owned real property. (b) The proportional amount shall be determined on the basis of the ratio of the Department financing of the acquisition of the real property multiplied against the sale amount, and shall be remitted to the Department within ninety (90) days of closing of sale. (c) Sale of real property acquired with Deparhnent funds shall be at market value as determined by appraisal, and the contract for sale must be approved in advance by the Department. (d) If any portion of the proceeds from the sale to the Agency is non-cash considerations, reimbursement to the Department shall include a proportional amount based on the value of the non-cash considerations- 23. Construction Projects: The Agency assures that it will: a. Project Certifications: Certifu project compliances, including (1) Consultant and contactor selection comply with all applicable federal, state and looal laws, rules, regulations, and policies. (2) All design plans and specifications comply with federal, state, and professional standards and applicable FAA advisory circulars, as well as the minimum standards established by the Department for State of Florida licensing as a public-use airport. (3) Completed constuction complies with all applicable local building codes' Exhibit C, Page 13 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2976 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades AirPark Financial Project Number: 441 I 1 5-l -94-0 I ContractNumber: G0O51 Original Agreement (4) Completed construction complies with the project plans and spocifications with certificaiion of that fact by the project Engineer' b. Design Development: For the plans, specifications, construction contract documois, and arry and all other engineering construction, and contractual documents produced by the BiO."r, which u."-tro"iouner collectively refened to as "plans", the Agenoy will certifY that: (1) The plans shall be developed in accordance with sound engineering and design principles, and with generally accepted professional standards. (2) The plans shall be consistent with the intent of the project as defined in Exhibit A and Exhibit B of this Agreement. (3) The project Engineer shall perform a review of the certification requirements listed in Section 82 above and make a determination as to their applicability to this project. (4) Development of the plans shall compiy with all applicable laws, ordinances' zoning and permitting requirements, publiic notice requirements, and other similar regulations' c. Inspection and Approval: The Agenoy assures that: (l) The Agency will provide and maintain competent technical supervision at the construction tit. ttro"ghout the project to assure that the work conforms to the plaos' specif,cations, and rchedol"t approved by the Departnort for the project' (2) The Agency assures that it will allow the Deparknent to inspect the work and that ij will proiid, any cost and progress reporting, as may be required by the Department' (3) The Agency asswos that it will take the appropriate corrective action necessary' ur'r*quirel by the Department, for work which does not conform to D€'partment standards. d. Pavement Preventive Maintenance: The Agency assures that for a project involving replacement or reconstruction of runway or taxiway pavanent it has implemented an airport pavement maintenanoe management program and that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed, or repaired with state financial assistance at the airport' 24. Noise Mitigation Projects: The Agency assures that it will: a. Government Agreements: For all noise compatibility project-s that are carried out by another unit oflocal government or af,e on property owned by a unit of local government otfrer-ihan the-Agency, the Agency sna[ Lnter into an agreement with that governmentbodY. Exhibit C, Page 14 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2977 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades AirPark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-1'94-0 1 Contract Number: G0O5l Original Agreement (l) The local agreement, satisfactory to the Department, sha1l obligate the unit of local government to the same tsrms and assurances that apply to the Agency. (2) The Agency assures that it will take steps to enforce the local agreerne,nt if there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement. b. Private Agreements: For noise compatibility projects on privately owned property, (1) The Age,lrcy shall enter into an agreement with the owner of that property to exclude future actions against the airport. (2) The Age,ncy asslues that it wiil take steps to enforce the agreement if there is substantial non-compliance with the terrns of the agreement. Exhibit C,Page 15 of 15 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2978 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Collier CountY Collier CountY AirPort AuthoritY Everglades AirPark Financial Project Number: 441 8 I 5-1 -94-01 ContractNumber: G0O51 Original Agreement EXHIBIT *D,, STATE FINAhICIAL ASSISTANCE (FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT) T.his exhibit forms an integrai part of that certain Joint Participation Agreement betweefl the State of Florida, Departrnent of Transportation and the Collier Countv Atrpot 'eutnontv' zuu: I Drive. S*ite l. Naoles. Florida i4114 referenced by the above Financial Project Number' OF THE FOLLO.WING: SUBJECT TO SECTTON 215'97, FLORITIA STATUTES: Awarding Agency: State Proiect Florida Deparhnent of Transportation AVIATION DEVELOPMENT GRANTS Title: CSFA Number: 55'004 *AwardAmount: S80,000.00 *The state award amount may change with supplemental agreements specific project infonnation for csFA Number 55.004 is provided at: htt$s :irapps.lltl fs.comltiaa/searchcatalo S.aspx State Project Compliance Requirernents for CSFA Number 55.004 are provided at: hllpp-;ii"*ppi, I.{,lap:ul ltaallcdrqhesupliituqs' nlp} The State Projects Compliance Supplemeirt is provided at: burri?:pps, {}il {l,sq} i i"1"., ,\r,.-..../ E\hibit D, Page I of I 16.G.6.b Packet Pg. 2979 Attachment: 441815-1 Everglades Seaplane Base_CAO Stamp (3609 : FDOT Grant for X01 Seaplane Base) Everglades Airpark Seaplane Base Feasibility Study SUMMARY REPORT FEBRUARY, 2016 PREPARED BY: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 D A Consulting, Inc. 2439 Treymore Drive Orlando, Florida 32825 Page -1 EVERGLADES AIRPARK SEAPLANE BASE FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………..…...1 FAA AND FDOT APPROVAL PROCESS .............................................................................. 1 PREFERRED LANDING AREA, RAMP LOCATION AND TAXI ROUTES ............................ 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 3 OPINION OF PROABLE COST .............................................................................................. 4 Exhibit A Potential Sea Lane Layout Overlaid on Marine Navigation Chart Exhibit B Aerial of Landing Area and Ramp Layout Appendix A Aeronautical and Infrastructure Considerations Appendix B Environmental Issues and Permitting Requirements Appendix C F.A.C. Chapter 14-60 Airport Licensing, Registration and Airspace Protection Appendix D FAA Advisory Circular 150/5395-1A Seaplane Bases 1 FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMARY REPORT FOR SEAPLANE BASE AT EVERGLADES AIRPARK INTRODUCTION At the request of Collier County Airport Authority, Hole Montes, Inc. was engaged to perform a feasibility study for a seaplane base at Evergaldes Airpark. D A Consulting, Inc. (DAC) and Passarella & Associates Inc. were engaged as sub consultants to provide technical review of various aspects of the feasibility of a seaplane base at this location. D A Consulting, Inc’s primary focus was to identify the feasibility of potential seaplane infrastructure from an aeronautical perspective which includes FAA and FDOT requirements. Passarella & Associates, Inc. focused their review on the environmental aspects and issues that would need to be addressed in order to obtain the regulatory agencies approval for the development of a seaplane base at Everglades Airpark. The findings of D A Consulting and Passarella and Associates are attached as Appendix A and B respectively. The anticipated seaplane base development would consist of establishing a landing and takeoff area (sea lane) in the waters adjacent to the airport and the construction of a dock/ramp to provide access to the airport. This report provides information from which the Sponsor may base a decision to proceed with the design and permitting of the project or determine to cease development. SUMMARY The results of the study did not reveal any obvious “show stopper” items related to airspace or environmental issues. However, due the uniqueness of the location, additional effort will be required to determine the actual or potential environmental impact and mitigate these impacts as required by the associated regulatory agencies. FAA and FDOT Approval Process The FAA approval process for the establishment of a new runway centers on the submission of two primary forms. FAA Form 7480-1, Notice of Construction, Alteration and Deactivation of Airports and FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. These are the forms that are required from an aeronautical perspective. Coordination with the FAA on environmental matters may result in the need to address/study certain issues or concerns prior to submission for the forms discussed above. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) licenses Everglades Airpark as a public use airport in accordance with Chapter 330 F.S. Chapter 14-60 Florida Administrative Code 2 (F.A.C.) amplifies the requirements for the establishment of airport authorized by statute. A review of the applicable code indicates that the construction of a new runway at an existing airport does not require the issuance of a new Site Approval Order. The establishment of a new sea lane at Everglades Airpark would require an update to the approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP). This process would need to be coordinated with FDOT via the appropriate district office and the planning section at the Aviation and Spaceports Office in Tallahassee. The FAA and FDOT processes for approval and licensing are outlined in more detail in Section 3 of Appendix A. Preferred Landing Area, Ramp Location and Taxi Routes The preferred sea lane location and alignment (for takeoff and landing) was determined to be in Chokoloskee Bay west of and parallel to the existing paved landside runway at Everglades Airpark. The runway centerline would offset more that 700 feet from the existing landside runway. However, the centerline may potentially be required to be offset farther west due to water depth and sea grass bed considerations. The actual sea lane offset would be determined during the permitting process and would be based on the results of bathymetry studies and sea grass studies. A marine navigation chart with a potential sea lane location is provided as Exhibit A The size of the recommended sea lane is 2500 feet long by 200 feet wide. This is the minimum recommended length and width based on both the FAA and FDOT Aviation guidance and requirements. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5395-1A SEAPLANE BASES and Florida Administrative Code Chapter 14-60 – AIRPORT LICENSING, REGISTRATION, AND AIRSPACE PROTECTION are provided as Appendix C and D. It is proposed that the sea lane not be marked with fixed buoys. While the marking of the sea lane is recommended by the FAA and provides a measure of protection for the airspace surrounding the sea lane, it is not anticipated that this will be necessary due to the unique location and lack of potential for develop in surrounding areas. Much of the surrounding airspace is already protected as a result of the existing hard surfaced runway. The placement of marker buoys would require additional approvals from the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and may require a submerged lands lease from the State of Florida. According to FDOT licensing requirements when the seaplane landing area is not marked then the airport primary surface and approach surface are not applicable for the sea lane. The preferred location of the dock and ramp facilities, based on a combination of both environmental and airspace considerations, is the northeast corner of the airport. Of the three locations on the airport property evaluated, this location results in the least impact from a combined environmental and airspace perspective. The proposed taxi routes are adjacent to or in existing navigational channels, and shown on Exhibit B. A conceptual layout of a dock and ramp configuration is provided as Exhibit B. The layout is intended as a starting point which may be refined during the design process. This layout would provide access for aircraft in the size range up to a Cessna Caravan on fixed floats or amphibian. The “L” shaped floating dock is aligned to encourage the preferred approach 3 to the dock as approaching from the east to the west. This will minimize the amount of time that aircraft will loiter in the area off the approach or departure end to the paved runway. Sea plane pilots typically dock their planes with the pilot’s side of the airplane to the dock, especially when assistance is not available on the dock. This dock configuration also provides for less maneuvering of the plane after docking to properly align it with the ramp for removal and launching. The location of the dock is adjacent to the navigational channel in the Barron River, but not so close as to negatively impact boat traffic in channel. The proximity of the channel and width of the water body in this area provides maneuvering room for both boats and waterborne aircraft. Approximately 70 feet of shoreline will need to be cleared of obstructions to permit movement of aircraft on the ramp. Environmental Issues and Permitting Requirements As part of the seaplane base feasibility analysis meeting with the following permitting agencies were conducted; South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A face-to-face meeting with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) was not feasible. However NMFS did provide feedback and recommendations via e-mail. None of the agencies indicated that a seaplane base would not be possible to permit at this location. However, they did indicate that various studies and detailed information would be required to be submitted and reviewed by various agencies prior to final approval. Approval was by no means guaranteed and any approval would be based on the review of data provided during the various permitting processes. The following documents would likely be required to be submitted and reviewed. Environmental Resource Permit Application (with a Mitigation Plan) Dock Permit FAA focused Environmental Assessment. Appendix B provides a more detailed summary of the comments and responses from the various regulatory agencies. 4 Opinion of probable cost to establish a landing area and design, permit and construct the associated facilities The probable cost to design, permit and construct a seaplane ramp and designate a sea lane is subject to numerous considerations. The exact requirements and studies required are subject to the requirements of the individual permitting agencies. The opinion of probable cost is an order of magnitude estimate based on an average design which is neither bare bones nor opulent. This probable cost estimate considers other dock and ramp systems that have recently been constructed in Southwest Florida and the proposed cost for seaplane ramps which have been constructed or are proposed for design. Projects Reviewed Included:  Leesburg, Florida, Proposed Seaplane Access, $ 2.1 million  St. Augustine, Florida $158,000, to rehabilitate an existing seaplane ramp  Collier County, Florida, Route 951 Boat Ramp, expansion of existing boat ramp $1,454,594.  Collier County, Florida, Goodland Boat Park, $1.7 million  Collier County, Florida, Bayview Boat Park, Phase 1, $337,959, Phase 2, $520,000.  Collier County, Florida, Golden Gate Community Park Dock , $179,060 Probable Cost for Engineering $70,000 Probable Cost for Bidding and Construction (Ramp, Paved Access, Seawall, Dock) $700,000 Environmental Permitting Cost: ERP, Dock Permit, Sea Grass Study, Bathymetric Study, $150,000 FAA Focused Environmental Assessment $30,000 Environmental Mitigation $250,000 Total order of magnitude probable cost estimate: $1.2 Million           AERONAUTICAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS              APPENDIX A            EVERGLADES AIRPARK SEAPLANE FEASIBILITY STUDY  AERONAUTICAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS      February 2016      Prepared for:      Collier County Airport Authority  2005 Mainsail Drive, Suite 1  Naples, FL 34114        Prepared by:    D A Consulting, Inc.  2439 Treymore Drive  Orlando, FL 32825          TABLE OF CONTENTS    SECTION                    PAGE      1.0 INTRODUCTION          1                       2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED RAMP LOCATION AND LANDING AREA  1    2.1 Preferred Ramp Location         1    2.1.1  South End of Airfield (Southeast Corner)      1  2.1.2 Midfield West of Runway 15/33       2  2.1.3 North End of Airfield (Northeast Corner)      2    2.2 Preferred Landing Area (Chokoloskee Bay)      3      2.2.1 Aeronautical Considerations        3  2.2.2 Regulatory Considerations        4    3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AND   FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) PROCESSES  5       3.1 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Process     5    3.1.1 FAA Form 7480‐1, Notice of Construction and Alteration   or Deactivation of Airports        5  3.1.2 FAA Form 7460‐1, Notice of Proposed Construction of Alteration    6    3.2 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Process    6    4.0 SUMMARY          7    Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION    At the request of the Collier County Airport Authority, D A Consulting, Inc. (DAC) was  engaged to perform a feasibility analysis for the establishment of a seaplane base at  Everglades Airpark. The role of DAC on the project team involved coordination with  other team members to identify suitable locations for a designated landing area (sea  lane), a seaplane mooring area (dock) and seaplane ramp. Due to the sensitive location  of the airpark, it is understood that a number of environmental issues may need to be  addressed prior to the establishment of a seaplane base. The analysis performed by DAC  considered the findings of the project environmental consultant, but the primary focus  was to identify the feasibility of potential seaplane infrastructure from an aeronautical  perspective.         2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED RAMP LOCATION AND LANDING AREA    Following a preliminary review of the existing Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for Everglades  Airpark and the surrounding waters, a site visit was conducted on September 15, 2015.  Members of the project team and the airport staff evaluated the merits of three (3)  prospective ramp locations on airport property. Fewer options were available for  designation as a sea lane (water runway) to serve the airpark. The group agreed that  subject to the satisfaction of environmental permitting and other regulatory issues, the  preferred location for the sea lane would be in a parallel alignment to Runway 15/33  just west of the existing airfield.      2.1 Preferred Ramp Location    Prior to the on site visit in September 2015, a review of available aerial  photography indicated that three (3) prospective ramp locations would be  considered to facilitate seaplane access between the existing airfield and the  designated sea lane.       2.1.1  South End of Airfield (Southeast Corner)    The first area considered was located at the south end of the airfield just  east of the approach to Runway 33. A ramp in this location would be  feasible from an airfield geometry standpoint, but it would be very close  to the edge of the Runway Safety Area (RSA) boundary. The presence of  shallow water adjacent to a small island immediately offshore was  deemed to have a potentially negative impact on the required taxi route  from the ramp to the designated sea lane. Boat traffic to/from a  neighboring business was also a concern at this location. As a result of  the concerns noted above, this location was not selected as the preferred  location for the seaplane ramp and associated mooring infrastructure.   Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 2   2.1.2 Midfield West of Runway 15/33    The second area considered was at the midfield point of the existing  airfield just west of Runway 15/33. While a ramp at this location would  provide the shortest taxi route to the designated landing area, a group of  mangroves separates the airfield from Chokoloskee Bay in this area. It  was determined that any proposal to remove the mangroves at this  location would introduce a number of environmental issues and may not  be possible. In addition to the environmental concerns surrounding this  location, a number of airfield issues would also have to be addressed at  significant expense to the sponsor. There is no parallel taxiway on the  west side of Runway 15/33. In an effort to reduce runway incursions, the  FAA recently adopted airfield geometry standards that prohibit direct  runway access on both sides of newly constructed taxiways. In this case,  compliance with this directive would require the design and construction  of a significant amount of additional pavement to access the existing  airfield from the seaplane ramp. Based on the factors listed above, this  location was not identified as a feasible location for the seaplane  ramp/dock infrastructure.     2.1.3  North End of Airfield (Northeast Corner)    The third and final location considered during the site visit was at the  north end of the airfield just east of the approach to Runway 15. While  this location is also in close proximity to the Runway Safety Area (RSA), it  offers more separation than the similarly positioned prospective location  at the south end of the airfield. The construction of a seaplane  dock/ramp at this location would result in a taxi route to the designated  landing area in a west‐northwest direction in what appears to be water of  more than adequate depth for seaplane operations. While there is  significant boat traffic in this area, there are no islands, sandbars or other  obstructions to seaplane navigation visible in the immediate area around  the proposed mooring area/seaplane ramp. This area integrates  favorably with the existing airfield geometry and adjacent off airport  property. A chain link fence delineates the airport property line from  what appears to be mainly vacant land on the adjacent parcel. There is a  small swale between the end of Taxiway A and the prospective ramp  location but the terrain in this area is generally flat and free of significant  vegetation. Based on preliminary input from regulatory agencies having  jurisdiction, an extension to the existing taxiway to reach the proposed  ramp/dock location would require a material, but manageable level of  environmental coordination. Based on the factors above and the  elimination of the other two (2) prospective locations, it appears that  Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 3 this area provides the most feasible site for development of seaplane  infrastructure from an aeronautical standpoint.       2.2 Preferred Landing Area (Chokoloskee Bay)    The establishment of seaplane landing area requires the consideration of a  number of safety factors both in the air and on the water. FAA Advisory Circular  150/5395‐1A outlines minimum requirements for sponsors to consider when  establishing a designated seaplane landing area. The minimum recommended  dimensions for a seaplane landing area serving mainly small single engine aircraft  is 2,500 feet in length with a minimum width of 200 feet to allow ample  maneuvering area. The preferred water depth is 6 feet although a minimum of 3  feet will suffice. The landing area should have a clear approach surface ratio of  20:1 for at least two (2) miles.     In the case of Everglades Airpark, the most feasible location for a landing area  is in Chokoloskee Bay, just west of the existing airfield. The bay surrounds the  airpark on three (3) sides and is bordered by the Barron River to the northeast  and the Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge to the west. Although the  National Wildlife Refuge is in close proximity, the portion of Chokoloskee Bay  where the proposed landing area would be located is considered state water. As  a result, applicable Florida Statutes and sections of the Florida Administrative  Code (F.A.C.) were considered when determining the feasibility of this location.       2.2.1  Aeronautical Considerations     A preliminary evaluation of the channel just west of the existing airfield  indicated that the establishment of a sea lane is this area would be  feasible given the water depth and the absence of any significant  obstructions. To the extent that fixed channel markers permit, the  preferred option would result in the designation of a sea lane aligned in  northwest‐southeast direction parallel to the existing Runway 15/33. The  orientation of the sea lane could be presented as Runway 15W/33W on  the required FAA Form 7480‐1. From the northern end of the sea lane,  arriving aircraft would reach the preferred seaplane mooring area and  ramp by taxiing in an easterly direction, north of the approach to Runway  15. Everglades Airpark is located in a rural setting approximately 17.6  nautical miles southeast of the nearest licensed public airport (Marco  Island Airport). As a result, we would not anticipate any airspace issues  related to the establishment of a new runway at the airpark.      In order to reduce potential nautical and aeronautical conflicts, it is  recommended that the length of the designated sea lane be consistent  Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 4 with the anticipated aircraft fleet mix. If only single engine aircraft are  expected to use the sea lane, the FAA Advisory Circular recommends a  runway length of between 2,500 and 3,500 feet. Based on a review of  aerial photography and nautical charts, it appears that compliance with  the recommended minimum sea lane length and runway separation  standards are both possible at this location. The sponsor has indicated  that an unmarked sea lane would be preferred. An unmarked sea lane  provides pilots with the flexibility to adjust their landing spot to avoid  conflicting nautical traffic and to take advantage of favorable wind  conditions. Sea lane markers require periodic maintenance as well as  United States Coast Guard (USCG) approval prior to installation. Given  the presence of nautical traffic in the bay, regulatory and maintenance  considerations, an unmarked sea lane would be the recommended  option in this case.     2.2.2 Regulatory Considerations    The project team has identified a number of material, but manageable  environmental concerns related to the establishment of a seaplane base  at Everglades Airpark. Additional research on related aeronautical factors  has revealed that the area of Chokoloskee Bay where the proposed  seaplane landing area is located is within a Manatee Protection Area as  identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC). The  immediate area just west of the airpark is within designated “Slow  Speed” and “Idle Speed” zones as outlined in Section 68C‐22.023 of the  Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). This section of the F.A.C. contains  the final order of adoption for all Manatee Protection Areas in Collier  County.     The order indicates that “vessels” must adhere to the definitions of slow  or idle speed when operating in this area. However, Chapter 327.02,  Paragraph 43 of the Florida Statutes specifically excludes “seaplanes on  water” from the definition of a vessel. This definition is affirmed by  reference in the Section 68C‐22.023 of the F.A.C. The federal definition of  a vessel does not exclude seaplanes on water and any applicable speed  restrictions would apply to both nautical and aeronautical conveyances in  federally controlled waters. As noted in the introduction, Chokoloskee  Bay is considered water under the jurisdiction of state regulatory  authorities. The state definition of a vessel should apply in this case and  the ability of seaplanes to operate within the proposed landing area  location would not appear to be restricted as a result.       Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 5 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AND FLORIDA  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) PROCESSES    Once the sponsor has identified the location of a seaplane landing area and related  infrastructure, a number of steps must be completed prior to the establishment of the  facility and the start of operations. Everglades Airpark is a licensed airport in the State of  Florida and is recognized by the FAA in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems  (NPIAS). As a result, it is anticipated that the establishment of a sea lane adjacent to the  airpark would be treated as a new runway at an existing airport by regulatory  authorities. This as opposed to the establishment of a new, separate airport. The  process of adding a runway at an existing airport requires the completion of a number  of steps, but is generally a less involved process than that required to license a brand  new facility.       3.1 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Process     The FAA process for the establishment of a new runway centers on the  submission of two (2) primary forms. FAA Form 7480‐1, Notice of Construction,  Alteration and Deactivation of Airports and the FAA Form 7460‐1, Notice of  Proposed Construction or Alteration. These are the forms that are required from  an aeronautical perspective. Coordination with the FAA on environmental  matters may result in the need to address/study certain issues or concerns prior  to submission of the forms discussed in the following paragraphs.     3.1.1  FAA Form 7480‐1, Notice of Construction and Alteration or  Deactivation of Airports    The Form 7480‐1 is the primary document by which the airport owner  notifies the FAA of their intent to establish a new runway at an existing  facility. The form requires basic information about the facility including  the location, operational characteristics and the type of proposal being  submitted (i.e. new facility, seaplane base or heliport). Section G requires  the submission of a drawing or other exhibit that shows the proposed  runway location, coordinates, obstructions and other information to  assist the FAA in evaluating the proposal.     The form should be submitted to the FAA Regional Office serving the area  in which the facility is located at least ninety (90) days prior to any  proposed construction or alteration. Upon receipt of a completed FAA  Form 7480‐1, the Regional Office coordinates a number of separate  reviews of the proposal within the FAA, which ultimately results in the  release of a determination commonly referred to as an “Airspace  Determination”. This document will represent the FAA position on the  Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 6 proposal following a study of the airspace surrounding the facility and a  review by other “interested offices” within the agency. If there is no  objection to the proposal, the sponsor may proceed with the planned  alterations subject to the satisfaction of other relevant regulatory issues.  The determination made by the FAA does not supersede the jurisdiction of  any other agencies or governmental entities.     3.1.2  FAA Form 7460‐1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration     The submission of a completed FAA Form 7460‐1 for construction of the  seaplane mooring area and ramp would be required in accordance with  FAR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. More particularly in  accordance with Section 77.9, which indicates that, notice is required for  “any construction or alteration located on a public use airport or heliport  regardless of height or location”. The form should be filed online at the  following address at least forty‐five (45) days prior to construction ‐  http://oeaaa.faa.gov. A drawing or sketch of the proposed construction  should be available and must include the coordinates of the project,  elevation information and distances from existing facilities. Much like the  FAA Form 7480‐1, the FAA completes an internal review of each proposal  and issues a determination outlining its findings.       3.2 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Process    The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) licenses Everglades Airpark as a public use  airport in accordance with Chapter 330 F.S. Chapter 14‐60 of the Florida Administrative Code  (F.A.C.) amplifies the requirements for the establishment of airports authorized by the statute.  A  review of the applicable code indicates that the construction of a new runway at an existing  airport does not require the issuance of a new Site Approval Order. This was confirmed during a  phone conversation with an FDOT representative at the Aviation and Spaceports Office. The  collection of required documents and submission of a package for a new Site Approval Order is a  very involved process. Confirmation of this exclusion is a positive development and should serve  to greatly simplify the overall FDOT process.     Establishment of a new sea lane at Everglades Airpark would require an update  to the approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP). This process would need to be  coordinated with FDOT via the appropriate district office and the planning  section at the Aviation and Spaceports Office in Tallahassee. In order to maintain  licensing compliance, the new sea lane would need to meet minimum standards  for a public use runway as outlined in the F.AC. Based on the proposed location  and geometrical dimensions discussed in earlier sections, this should not be an  issue at Everglades Airpark.  Everglades Airpark Seaplane Feasibility Study 7     4.0 SUMMARY    A preliminary analysis of aeronautical factors as they impact the feasibility of establishing a sea lane and  related seaplane mooring facilities at Everglades Airpark was conducted by DAC. The preferred location  for the sea lane was determined to be in Chokoloskee Bay just west of the existing airfield. After  considering three (3) potential locations for the seaplane mooring area and related seaplane ramp, it was  determined that the most feasible location is at the northeast corner of the airport property adjacent to  the approach to Runway 15. The project environmental consultant has identified a number of concerns  that would need to be addressed but none were noted as insurmountable. Subject to the disposition of  these environmental concerns and any other local regulatory issues, the preferred locations identified for  the seaplane base infrastructure and related sea lane appear to be feasible from an aeronautical  perspective.             ENVORNMENTAL ISSUES AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS              APPENDIX B            Project No. 99HMA450 EVERGLADES AIRPARK SEAPLANE BASE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS March 2016 Prepared For: Collier County Airport Authority 3005 Main Sail Drive Naples, Florida 34114 (239) 642-7878 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 2.0 Preliminary Site Review ......................................................................................................1 3.0 Pre-Application Meeting Summary .....................................................................................1 3.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................1 3.2 SFWMD/FDEP .............................................................................................................5 3.3 COE...............................................................................................................................6 3.4 USFWS .........................................................................................................................7 3.5 NMFS ............................................................................................................................7 4.0 Anticipated Environmental Permits .....................................................................................8 5.0 Preliminary Environmental Permitting Cost Estimate .........................................................8 6.0 Summary ..............................................................................................................................9 ii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Project Location Map ............................................................................................2 Figure 2. Regional Aerial with Boundary ............................................................................3 Figure 3. Aerial with Boundary and Photograph Locations .................................................4 iii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Preliminary Environmental Permitting Cost Estimate ..........................................9 iv LIST OF EXHIBITS Page Exhibit 1. Correspondence from the FDEP, dated November 2, 2015 .............................. E-1 Exhibit 2. Correspondence from the COE, dated October 21, 2015 ................................. E-2 Exhibit 3. Correspondence from the NMFS, dated December 15, 2015 ........................... E-3 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Per the request of the Collier County Airport Authority (CCAA), a seaplane base feasibility analysis was conducted for Everglades Airpark (Project) located in Sections 14, 15, and 23; Township 53 South; Range 29 East; Collier County (Figure 1). A regional aerial with the boundary of the Project site is included as Figure 2. The analysis included a preliminary site review to document existing site conditions within the Project and attendance at pre-application meetings with the environmental permitting agencies to determine the feasibility of obtaining environmental permits for a seaplane base at the Everglades Airpark. This report summarizes the results of the preliminary site review and pre-application meeting discussions with the permitting agencies. In addition, the report includes a preliminary estimate of environmental permitting costs. 2.0 PRELIMINARY SITE REVIEW A site review of the Project was conducted on September 15, 2015 to review the existing conditions and to determine potential locations for a potential seaplane base. The site visit attendees included representatives from CCAA, Hole Montes, Inc. (HMI), D A Consulting, Inc. (DAC), and Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI). Three locations were considered for a seaplane base during the site inspection. These areas included: 1) the northern portion of the site, north of the parallel taxiway; 2) the west-central portion of the site; and 3) the southern portion of the site, south of the parallel taxiway. Photographs of the three areas taken during the site review are depicted on Figure 3. Based on a review of the three locations, it was determined that the northern portion of the site is the preferred location for a seaplane base since it will result in fewer wetland impacts and presented fewer safety issues. 3.0 PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY As part of the feasibility analysis, the project team (CCAA, HMI, DAC, and PAI) met with the following permitting agencies to discuss the seaplane base: the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). A meeting with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) was not feasible. During the meetings, the project team presented Figures 2 and 3 and generally described the concepts of the seaplane base. The project description, as discussed in the pre-application meetings, and input received from the permitting agencies is provided in Sections 3.1 through 3.5 below. 3.1 Project Description The project is conceptual in nature and no site plan has been prepared for the seaplane base; however, establishment of a seaplane base will require the construction of shoreline features (i.e., seawall, dock, moorings, ramp, etc.), identification of a specific landing area, and potential construction of a maintenance facility located near the existing REV IE WED BY DR AWN B Y REV ISE D DA TE DA TE DA TE COLLIERCOLLIER MONROEMONROE (/41 CR 29CR 29SR 29SR 29BIRDON RDBIRDON RDCCOOPPEELLAANNDDAAVV EE SS TURNER RIVER RDTURNER RIVER RDCOLLIER AVECOLLIER AVEBASS LAKE RDBASS LAKE RDMAMIE STMAMIE STGulf of Mexico COLLIERCOLLIER HENDRYHENDRYLEELEE MONROEMONROE §¨¦75 (/41 ¿À29 ¿À839 ¿À846 ¿À833 ¿À951 ¿À837 ¿À835 ¿À858 ¿À94 ¿À850 ¿À849 ¿À892 EVERGLADES BLVDOIL WE LL RD LIVINGSTON RDVANDERBILT DR^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ MI A M I TAM P A NAP LE S ORLA NDO KE Y WE S T SA R A SO TA PE NS AC OLA FOR T M YE R S VE R O B E A CH LA KE PL ACI D PA NA MA CITY GA INE S VI LLE TAL LA HA SS E E JACK S ON VI LLE DA YT ONA BE A CH FORT LA UDE RDA L E¶ PRO JECT L OCAT IONSEC 14,15,23, T WP 53 S , R NG 29 E FIGU RE 1. P ROJECT LOC ATION MA P F.L./T.S. S.J. 1/13/16 1/13/16EVERGLADES AI RP ARK DRAFT 2. B A R R O N R IV E R C HOKOLOSKEE BAY %4%12'.#0&#8'0,#5/+0'569 -7/37#656 #+42#4-4&1;56'4$#4.02.#06#6+102-9; % 12'.#0&#8'5 SCALE: 1" = 500',>>JOC>>5GC2NCPG(GCUCDKNKV[#PCN[UKU>(KIWTG4GIKQPCN#GTKCNYKVJ$QWPFCT[FYI6CD:Ä%6$,CPÄRO2NQVVGFD[6JQPG513620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Phone (239) 274-0067 Fax (239) 274-0069 DRAWING No. SHEET No. 99HMA450DATE DATE DATEDRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVISED EVERGLADES AIRPARK REGIONAL AERIAL WITH BOUNDARY D.B. S.J. 10/12/15 10/12/15 016'5 #'4+#.2*161)4#2*59'4'#%37+4'&6*417)*6*' %1..+'4%1706;2412'46;#224#+5'4ž51((+%'9+6* #(.+)*6&#6'1(,#07#4; 2412'46;$170&#4;2'4*1.'/106'5#0&#551%+#6'5 &4#9+0)0Q/#56'4&9)&#6'&#7)756 FIGURE 2 2. 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI5QWVJGCUV 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI5QWVJGCUV 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI5QWVJYGUV 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI5QWVJYGUV 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI0QTVJYGUV 2JQVQ.QECVKQP0QNQQMKPI0QTVJYGUV SCALE: 1" = 100',>>JOC>>5GC2NCPG(GCUCDKNKV[#PCN[UKU>(KIWTG#GTKCNYKVJ$QWPFCT[CPF2JQVQITCRJ.QECVKQPUFYI6CD:Ä%6$,CPÄRO2NQVVGFD[6JQPG513620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Phone (239) 274-0067 Fax (239) 274-0069 DRAWING No. SHEET No. 99HMA450DATE DATE DATEDRAWN BY DESIGNED BY REVISED EVERGLADES AIRPARK AERIAL WITH BOUNDARY AND PHOTOGRAPH LOCATIONS D.B. S.J. 10/12/15 10/12/15 016'5 #'4+#.2*161)4#2*59'4'#%37+4'&6*417)*6*' %1..+'4%1706;2412'46;#224#+5'4ž51((+%'9+6* #(.+)*6&#6'1(,#07#4; 2412'46;$170&#4;2'4*1.'/106'5#0&#551%+#6'5 &4#9+0)0Q/#56'4&9)&#6'&#7)756 FIGURE 3 5 terminal building. The shoreline features will be constructed along the northern area of the Project to minimize wetland impacts and safety concerns. A 60- to 70-foot swath will be required to be cleared along the shoreline to accommodate the anticipated use which will result in unavoidable impacts to mangrove wetlands. No dredging is anticipated with the construction of shoreline features. The construction of the shoreline features may also require the realignment of an existing swale that is part of the existing surface water management system for the airport facility. The landing area will be established in Chokoloskee Bay parallel to the existing runway. The landing area will have a defined distance and will be located in an area that maintains a minimum water depth of at least three feet necessary for seaplanes to land. It is not anticipated that the landing area will be physically identified by buoys or markers, but permanent markers may be required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Planes could use the landing area from either end depending on wind direction. The landing area will not be located within the National Park Service or National Wildlife Refuge boundaries (i.e., Everglades National Park and Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuge). Once established, it is anticipated that the seaplane base will be operated by CCAA. The seaplane base will support small engine aircraft (i.e., Cessna 172/210 or similar) with intermittent operations occurring only during the day. The planes will be amphibious or on floats and will function similar to boats and other watercraft while in the water, but are not likely to cause turbidity issues since their propellers do not operate below the water surface. The traffic level associated with the seaplane base is unknown at this time, but the preliminary estimated traffic is a few planes per day. This could increase with demand. 3.2 SFWMD/FDEP The project team met with the SFWMD and the FDEP (via teleconference) on October 14, 2015 to discuss the seaplane base. During the meeting, SFWMD and FDEP staff provided the following comments and recommendations:  A sovereign submerged land lease may be required for impacts below the mean high water line for construction of the shoreline features and for the landing areas. SFWMD and FDEP staff will research the lease requirements with the Division of State Lands and will get back to the project team.  If impacts are located within Outstanding Florida Waters, then the applicant must demonstrate that the project is clearly in the public’s interest.  Seagrass surveys will be required for construction of shoreline features (i.e., boat docks, moorings, etc.) and for the landing area.  FDEP staff recommended avoiding impacts to seagrasses.  FDEP staff recommended reviewing the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) key and Collier County Manatee Protection Plan for potential impacts to the species. 6  The applicant will be required to provide a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest history since a nest (CO-022) was previously documented on the adjacent property to the east.  Filling wetlands (particularly mangroves) or other surface waters below the mean high water line may trigger smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) issues.  The Project is not in the service area of Little Pine Island Mitigation Bank (LPIMB), so on-site wetland mitigation is preferred if feasible. If on-site mitigation is not feasible, then an off-site mitigation alternative must be proposed within the same drainage basin.  FDEP staff recommended reviewing the state’s mangrove rule prior to submitting an application.  SFWMD staff recommended contacting Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve staff to explore potential off-site mitigation opportunities.  SFWMD staff stated that the modification of the Project’s existing surface water management system (swale realignment) could potentially be handled through a letter of modification.  A review of navigation safety may be required during the permitting process since the proposed location of shoreline features is at the mouth of the Barrow River, which is an area of high boat traffic. By e-mail dated November 2, 2015 (Exhibit 1), FDEP staff provided the following additional information as a follow-up to the October 14, 2015 meeting:  No additional authorization to use state-owned lands would be required for the landing area unless there would be a permanent preemption through the installation of buoys or markers.  The mooring area or ramp may require a lease if it is related to commercial activities. However, no lease would be required if it is considered a public structure that is owned and operated by a government entity, any revenues collected are used solely for the operation and maintenance of the structure, and the preempted area is less than 10:1 of preempted area to shoreline ratio.  Reasonable assurance would need to be provided to demonstrate that the proposed activity would not interfere with the safe navigation of others. 3.3 COE The project team met with the COE on October 20, 2015 to discuss the seaplane base. During the meeting, COE staff provided the following comments and recommendations:  Navigation could be a concern given the proposed location of the shoreline features.  If grant funding will be received for the project, COE staff recommended noting that information in the permit application.  An alternative site analysis will be required for the project. Marco Island Executive Airport and Immokalee Regional Airport would be acceptable to use as alternate sites. 7  The applicant will need to include a statement on avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts and a mitigation proposal as part of the permit application. The mitigation proposal must include forested saltwater compensation if impacts to mangroves are proposed.  Realignment of the existing drainage swale could result in additional impacts if the swale is determined to be COE jurisdictional.  A 21-day public notice would likely be issued for the project.  Section 7 (Endangered Species Act (ESA)) consultation with the USFWS and the NMFS may be required for the West Indian manatee and smalltooth sawfish. Additionally, consultation with the Habitat Conservation Division of NMFS may be required if impacts to seagrasses are proposed.  The consultation process with the NMFS is currently taking approximately 12 months. By e-mail dated October 21, 2015 (Exhibit 2), COE staff provided the following additional information as a follow-up to the October 20, 2015 meeting:  COE staff emphasized that ESA issues would be a concern, especially for the West Indian manatee. Using the USFWS’ manatee key, the project results in a “may affect” for the species. 3.4 USFWS The project team met with the USFWS on December 2, 2015 to discuss the seaplane base. During the meeting, USFWS staff provided the following comments and recommendations:  The COE will coordinate with the USFWS through Section 7 of the ESA once a permit application is submitted for the Project. The anticipated ESA issues include West Indian manatee, smalltooth sawfish, and possibly the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus).  In addition to the ESA issues, a summary of Bald Eagle Nest CO-022 and a review of nearby osprey (Pandion haliaetus) nests may be required since they are both protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.  Noise issues and conflicts with boat traffic may need to be addressed during the environmental permitting process. USFWS staff recommended coordinating with Everglades National Park staff regarding noise-related issues.  USFWS recommended that the applicant verify that the proposed seaplane base does not interfere with, or encroach into, National Park Service, National Wildlife Refuge, and National Preserve (i.e., Big Cypress National Preserve) boundaries. 8 3.5 NMFS Although the project team did not have the opportunity to meet with and discuss the seaplane base with the NMFS, NMFS staff provided the following comments and recommendations via an e-mail dated December 15, 2015 (Exhibit 3):  It was recommended that the proposed dock access walkway be situated within the narrowest portion of the Project’s mangrove fringe.  From a review of historical and current imagery, it appears that portions of Chokoloskee Bay proposed for dock construction support, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV). To quantify the amount of SAV, it is recommended that a survey be conducted from June 1 through September 30 of subtidal areas proposed for dock construction.  A detailed compensatory mitigation, monitoring, and contingency plan must be prepared for unavoidable impacts to mangrove and SAV habitat. The Project is not located in the service area of LPIMB; therefore, LPIMB may not be used for the purchase of compensatory wetland credits for mangrove impacts. 4.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Based on the feedback received from the environmental permitting agencies, the following permits are anticipated to construct a seaplane base on the Project site:  SFWMD/FDEP Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)  COE Individual Dredge and Fill Permit The ERP and COE permit will include docks and other structures necessary for the construction of the seaplane base. The COE permit process will include Section 7 ESA consultation with the USFWS and the NMFS. 5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING COST ESTIMATE Table 1 includes the preliminary environmental permitting cost estimate based on the pre- application meetings and input received from the SFWMD, the FDEP, the COE, the USFWS, and the NMFS. The cost estimate also includes a preliminary budget number for anticipated wetland mitigation costs and an estimate to prepare a FAA focused Environmental Assessment for the project. The cost estimate does not include coordination with agencies such as the U.S. Coast Guard that may be required during the environmental permitting process. Additionally, the cost estimate does not include species-specific wildlife surveys or mitigation that may be required by the permitting agencies, and is therefore subject to change. 9 Table 1. Preliminary Environmental Permitting Cost Estimate Description Cost Environmental Permitting1 $150.000.00 Wetland Mitigation2 $250,000.00 FAA Focused Environmental Assessment $ 30,000.00 Total $430,000.00 1Includes SFWMD/FDEP and COE permitting, Section 7 ESA consultation with the USFWS and the NMFS, and bathymetric and seagrass surveys. 2To be refined once wetland impacts are quantified and a mitigation site has been selected. 6.0 SUMMARY An analysis was conducted to determine the feasibility of obtaining environmental permits for a seaplane base on the Project site. The analysis included a preliminary site review to document existing site conditions within the Project and attendance at pre-application meetings with the environmental permitting agencies to discuss the seaplane base. During the preliminary site review, it was determined that the northern portion of the site is the preferred location for a seaplane base since it will result in fewer wetland impacts and presented fewer safety issues. The project team subsequently met with the environmental permitting agencies to discuss the proposed location and conceptual details of the seaplane base. Several environmental concerns were addressed during the meetings including, but not limited to, mangrove impacts, listed species impacts, and mitigation; however, no indication was given by the permitting agencies to suggest that a seaplane base would not be permittable. A preliminary environmental permitting cost estimate is provided in Section 5.0 above. EXHIBIT 1 CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE FDEP, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2015 EXHIBIT 2 CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE COE, DATED OCTOBER 21, 2015 EXHIBIT 3 CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE NMFS, DATED DECEMBER 15, 2015           Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 14‐60  AIRPORT LICENSING, REGISTRATION, AND AIRSPACE  PROTECTION              APPENDIX C            CHAPTER 14-60 AIRPORT LICENSING, REGISTRATION, AND AIRSPACE PROTECTION 14-60.003 Purpose, Definitions, and Designation of Signature Authority 14-60.005 Airport Site Approval 14-60.006 Airport Licenses and Registrations 14-60.007 Airfield Standards for Licensed Airports 14-60.009 Airspace Protection 14-60.011 Forms 14-60.003 Purpose, Definitions, and Designation of Signature Authority. (1) Purpose. The purpose of this rule chapter is to promote safe civil aviation by eliminating hazards; to provide airfield standards for airports; to provide standards for airport marking and lighting; to license and register airports, pursuant to the licensing and registration requirements of Chapter 330, F.S.; and to promote flight safety by providing for airspace protection, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 333, F.S. (2) Definitions. (a) The definitions in Section 330.27, F.S., shall apply to this rule chapter. (b) For purposes of this rule chapter the following additional terms are defined: 1. “Aeronautics” means transportation by aircraft; the operation, construction, repair, or maintenance of aircraft, aircraft power plants and accessories, including the repair, packing, and maintenance of parachutes; the design, establishment, construction, extension, operation, improvement, repair, or maintenance of airports, restricted landing areas, or other air navigation facilities, and air instruction. 2. “Airport Hazard” means any structure or tree or use of land that would exceed the federal obstruction standards and which obstructs the airspace required for the flight of aircraft in taking off, maneuvering, or landing or is otherwise hazardous to such taking off, maneuvering, or landing of aircraft and for which no person has previously obtained a permit or variance. 3. “Airport Hazard Area” means any area of land or water upon which an airport hazard might be established if not prevented. 4. “Applicant” means a person submitting an application for private or public airport site approval or public airport license. 5. “Approach Surface” means an area that surrounds and protects the landing approach area, which is longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline and extends outward and upward from each end of the runway primary surface. 6. “Coefficient of Friction” (“Mu”) means a value that is an indicator of the resistance to motion of two moving objects or surfaces that touch. 7. “Displaced Threshold” means a point on the runway beyond the threshold to re-designate the beginning portion of the runway available for landing, although the portion of pavement preceding a displaced threshold may be available for takeoffs in either direction and landings from the opposite direction. 8. “FATO” means the designated “Final Approach and Takeoff” area for helicopter operations. 9. “IFR” means the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established “Instrument Flight Rules,” under which aircraft operate when meteorological conditions, ceiling, and/or visibility exist that are below the minimums for flight under visual flight rules. 10. “Local Government” means a city or county and shall include political subdivisions as defined in Section 333.01(9), F.S. 11. “Non-precision Instrument Runway” means a runway having an existing or planned instrument approach procedure using air navigation facilities with only horizontal guidance or area type navigation equipment for which a straight-in non-precision instrument approach procedure has been approved. 12. “Obstruction” means any existing or proposed manmade object or object of natural growth or terrain that violates federal obstruction standards. 13. “Pavement Condition Index” (“PCI”) means a value that is an indicator of the integrity and viability of a runway surface with a focus on pavement cracking, swelling, rutting, and depressions. 14. “Precision Instrument Runway” means a runway having an existing or planned instrument approach procedure using an Instrument Landing System or a Precision Approach Radar. 15. “Primary Surface” means a surface area that surrounds and protects the landing area; the dimensions of which vary by type of landing area, weight of the landing aircraft, visibility, and the type of landing approach. 16. “Runway Safety Area” means a specified surface surrounding the runway that is prepared or suitable for reducing the risk of damage to airplanes in the event of an undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway. 17. “Structure” means any object, constructed or installed by humans, including, but without limitation thereof, buildings, towers, smokestacks, utility poles, and overhead transmission lines. 18. “Threshold” means the beginning of that portion of the runway available for landing. 19. “TLOF” means the designated “Touchdown and Liftoff” area for helicopter operations. 20. “Transition Surface” means a surface area that surrounds and protects the lateral boundaries of the primary and approach surfaces, which extends outward and upward at right angles to the runway centerline and the extended runway centerline at specified ratios. 21. “Traverse Way” means any highway, roadway, waterway, railway, or other public or private surface transitway, that allows for the passage of mobile objects. 22. “Utility Runway” means a runway that is constructed for and intended to be used by propeller driven aircraft of 12,500 pounds maximum gross weight or less. 23. “VFR” means FAA established “Visual Flight Rules” under which aircraft operate when favorable meteorological conditions, ceiling, or visibility exist that are above the minimums for flight under instrument flight rules. 24. “Visual Runway” means a runway intended solely for the operation of aircraft using visual approach procedures, with no planned straight-in instrument approach procedure designation. (3) The State Aviation Manager is authorized to issue site approval orders and licenses, and to accept registrations for those airports subject to the licensing and registration requirements of Section 330.30, F.S., and to enforce the provisions of Chapter 330, F.S. Additionally, the State Aviation Manager is authorized to issue airspace obstruction permits subject to the requirements of Section 333.025, F.S., and to enforce the provisions of Chapter 333, F.S. (4) All Department actions regarding the application for issuance, renewal, amendment, suspension, or revocation of site approval orders, and licenses and registrations shall be in accordance with Chapters 120 and 330, F.S., and this rule chapter. Additionally, all Department actions regarding the application for issuance of airspace obstruction permits shall be in accordance with Chapters 120 and 333, F.S., and this rule chapter. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 330.30, 330.35, 333.065 FS. History–New 11-23-72, Amended 11-19- 81, 1-8-85, Formerly 14-60.03, Amended 12-26-95, 2-11-97, 10-10-04. 14-60.005 Airport Site Approval. (1) Any proposed new airport requires an airport site approval order issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (Department). Site approval by the Department is required prior to the establishment of an operational airport. (2) Issuance of a new airport site approval order shall be required by the Department, whenever: (a) The Department has determined the airport site approval order to be invalid because the site approval application contained inaccurate data or misrepresentation of facts. (b) The Department has revoked the airport site approval order. (c) The license for an existing public airport has expired, without having a new license issued. (d) The registration for an existing private airport has expired, without being re-certified. (3) An application for airport site approval shall be made in the form and manner required by the Department. There are no monetary fees required for this airport site approval service. (a) Public Airport. Public airport site approval applicants shall submit a Public Airport Site Approval Application, DOT Form 725-040-12, Rev. 02/04, incorporated by reference under Rule 14-60.011, F.A.C., along with all required supporting documentation, to the following: State Aviation Manager, Florida Department of Transportation, 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 46, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450. (b) Private Airport. Private airport site approval applicants shall complete an interactive internet-based registration application and certify that the information is true and correct to the best of their knowledge, using a Department electronic aviation facility data system. (c) Temporary Airport. Temporary, public or private airport site approval applicants, due to the limitations placed on their use for a period of less than 30 days and the restriction to no more than 10 operations per day, and due to a normal short lead-time prior to the necessity for activating flight operations, shall have a site approval process with each proposal evaluated by the Department based upon the application. Applicants for a temporary, public or private airport site approval should contact the Department at the earliest opportunity to present their requirements and request a site proposal review and Department approval or disapproval. (4) Conditions for Site Approval. The Department shall grant site approval for a proposed airport that complies with all the requirements of Section 330.30, F.S., subject to any reasonable conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. Such conditions shall include operations limited to VFR flight conditions, restricted approach or takeoff direction from only one end of a runway, specified air-traffic pattern layouts to help prevent mid-air collision conflict with aircraft flying at another nearby airport, airport noise abatement procedures in order to satisfy community standards, or other environmental compatibility measures. (5) Public Airport Site Approval. Public airport site approval applications shall be accompanied by the following supporting documentation to allow the Department to make its airport site approval determination and to ensure the applicant’s satisfaction of conditions stated in subsection 14-60.005(4), F.A.C., above: (a) Property Rights. Provide a copy of written legal confirmation of ownership, option to buy, or lease agreement for the real property that comprises the site on which the proposed airport would be located. Although adequate safety areas surrounding an airport site are important and a factor in the Department’s approval determination, the applicant is not required to hold property rights over those real property areas that would constitute runway approach surfaces. (b) Facility Diagram. Provide a scale drawing showing the size and dimensions of the proposed facility; property rights of way and easements; lighting, power, and telephone poles; location of building(s) on property and surrounding areas; and direction, distance, and height of all structures over 25 feet within 1,000 feet of the site perimeter. (c) Geodetic Position. Provide a copy of a U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map or equivalent with the proposed site plotted to the nearest second of latitude and longitude. (d) Location Map. Provide a copy of a map or sketch, at least 8.5 x 11 inches in size, showing the location of the proposed site, with respect to recognizable landmarks and access roads to the site clearly marked. (e) Aviation Facilities. Provide a list of names and mailing addresses for adjacent airports, including a sample copy of the letter submitted as proposal notification to these airports, and attach a copy of all airport reply correspondence. 1. For a proposed airport or seaplane landing facility, list all VFR airports and heliports within five nautical miles and all IFR airports within 20 nautical miles. 2. For a proposed heliport, list all VFR airports and heliports within three nautical miles and all IFR airports within 10 nautical miles. (f) Local Government. Provide a copy of each of the letters of notification, showing the recipient’s name and mailing address, that have been submitted to each zoning authority having jurisdiction, for the municipality and county in which the site lies or which is located within five nautical miles of the proposed airport site. The applicant shall also include a copy of all related correspondence from each city or county authority, including a statement that the proposed airport site is in compliance with local zoning requirements or that such requirements are not applicable. (g) Adjacent Property. Provide a list of the names and mailing addresses of all real property owners within 1,000 feet of the airport site perimeter, or within 300 feet of the heliport or helistop site perimeter, including a single copy of the letter of notification submitted as notification to these adjacent real property owners, and include a copy of all real property owner correspondence in reply. If notification was provided by a local government as part of its review and approval process for the airport, provide written confirmation of the fact, in lieu of the above required submittal by the applicant. (h) Public Notice. Provide a copy of the notice and of the letter, showing the recipient’s name and mailing address, requesting publication of notification of the proposed airport site in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the proposed airport site is located and counties within five nautical miles of the proposed airport site. If this condition has been accomplished by a local government as part of its review and approval process for the airport, provide written confirmation of the fact, in lieu of the above required submittal by the applicant. (i) Waste Sites. Provide written confirmation that the runway(s) on the proposed airport would not be located within 5,000 feet of any solid waste management facility for a proposed airport serving only non-turbine aircraft, or within 10,000 feet of any solid waste management facility for a proposed airport serving turbine-driven aircraft. (j) Air Traffic Pattern. Provide written confirmation, including a graphical depiction, demonstrating that safe air traffic patterns can be established for the proposed airport with all existing and approved airport sites within three miles of the proposed airport site. Provide a copy of written memorandum(s) of understanding or letter(s) of agreement, signed by each respective party, regarding air traffic pattern separation procedures between the parties representing the proposed airport and any existing airport(s) or approved airport site(s) located within three miles of the proposed site. (k) Safety Factors. Provide written confirmation that the runway and taxiway design criteria and airport design layout of the proposed airport have appropriately taken into account consideration of the manufacturer’s performance characteristics for the type(s) of aircraft planned to be operated; the frequency and type(s) of flight operations to be anticipated; planned aviation-related or non-aviation activities on the airport; and any other safety considerations, as necessary, to help ensure the general public health, safety, and welfare of persons located on or near the airport. (l) Security Factors. Provide written confirmation that the proposed airport site owner or lessee will take appropriate steps to help protect the general public health, safety, and welfare through secure airport operations and that they will develop and implement adequate airport security measures to safeguard airport and aviation-related assets from misappropriation or misuse in order to prevent potential loss or public endangerment. (m) FAA Approval. Provide a copy of the notification to the FAA regarding the proposed airport site and a copy of the FAA’s airspace approval correspondence given in response. (6) Private Airport Site Approval. Private airport site approval applications, as stated in paragraph 14-60.005(3)(b), F.A.C., above, are subject to the same requirements for approval as stated for public airport site approval applicants in paragraphs 14- 60.005(5)(a)-(m), F.A.C., above. However, private airport site approval applicants are required only to respond to interactive inquiries on the specified Department private airport website. Private airport applicants are not required to submit a hard copy, written site approval application nor supporting documentation, as required of public airports. However, all private airport site approval applicants shall retain for their records all of the required documentation related to the site approval application, in order to be able to respond to any possible future local, state, or federal inquiry. (a) The Private Airport Registration and Site Approval website (http://www.florida-aviation-database.com/) uses a series of interactive screens to provide information and receive input from private airport owners. To begin the process, general airport site approval information is provided in narrative outline form as an overview of the process, listing requirements included in paragraphs 14-60.005(5)(a)-(m), F.A.C. (b) In keeping with the legislative requirement for controlled electronic access to the state aviation database, the Department’s site uses a “User ID” and “Password” system. New users will be required to “Create an Account” online by providing essential information: name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address. The website will respond providing an initial “User ID” and “Password” for the user to complete the site approval process. (c) The airport site approval screen asks the user to input data related to type of facility (airport, heliport, or ultralight); proponent information (name, address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address); facility data (facility name, physical location, geographical location – latitude, longitude, and elevation, and primary type of facility use); and landing area data (runway/ helipad magnetic bearing, length, width, and type of surface – paved/unpaved). (d) The user certifies the accuracy of the information and data entered on the screen and submits the information to the Department. (e) Approval or denial of the airport site approval application is issued by the Department via e-mail to the applicant’s e-mail address, along with an airport site approval order, if granted. (7) Department Site Approval Process. The Department process for determining the approval or disapproval of an airport site application will vary by type of airport proposed, as follows: (a) Department Process for Public Airports. The Department shall conduct a review and detailed audit, as necessary, of the submitted airport site approval application and all required supporting documentation for accuracy and completeness. Failure of the applicant to provide a complete application by the conclusion of this period shall result in the Department returning the application to the applicant without action. Site approval shall be granted for public airports only after the Department determines the conditions of subsection 14-60.005(4), F.A.C., above, are satisfied and only after favorable completion of a physical inspection of the proposed public airport site by Department authorized personnel. 1. Following issuance of the public airport site approval order, the Department shall place an announcement in the Florida Administrative Register. In order to allow for required administrative processing and publishing lead times, 45 days shall be allowed from the date of issuance until the effective date of the public airport site approval order. 2. From the date of publication of the Florida Administrative Register containing the public airport site approval order announcement, 21 days shall be allowed for the public to petition the Department for an administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120.57(1), F.S. a. If a petition for administrative hearing is not filed, the public airport site approval order shall take effect 45 days after the date of its issuance. b. If a petition for administrative hearing is filed, the public site approval order shall not take effect 45 days after the date of its issuance, but shall be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the administrative hearing. The Department will provide notification to the applicant stating that a petition has been filed and that the public airport site approval order effective date is pending the outcome of the administrative hearing. 3. Any public airport limited exclusively to the specific, reasonable conditions stated on its site approval order imposed by the Department to protect public health, safety, or welfare, shall be designated a “Limited Airport.” (b) Department Process for Private Airports. The Department shall conduct a review and detailed audit, as necessary, of the private airport site application information, submitted via the specified electronic internet-based website. Incomplete information will preclude the Department from further processing and the applicant will be notified of application deficiencies. Site approval shall be granted for private airports only after the requirements of subsection 14-60.005(4), F.A.C., above, have been met. Physical inspection of the private airport site is not required. 1. The Department shall place an announcement in the Florida Administrative Register of the issuance of the private airport site approval order. 2. From the date of publication of the Florida Administrative Register containing the private airport site approval order announcement, 21 days shall be allowed to petition the Department for an administrative hearing pursuant to Chapter 120, F.S. a. If a petition for administrative hearing is not filed, the private airport site approval order shall take effect 45 days after the date of its issuance. b. If a petition for administrative hearing is filed, the private airport site approval order shall not take effect but shall be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the administrative hearing. The Department will provide notification to the applicant stating that a petition has been filed and that the private airport site approval order effective date is pending the outcome of the administrative hearing. 3. Any private airport limited exclusively to the specific, reasonable conditions stated on its site approval order imposed by the Department to protect public health, safety, or welfare, shall be designated a “Limited Airport.” (c) Department Process for Temporary Airports. The Department shall conduct a review and detailed audit, as necessary, of the information submitted by temporary, public or private airport applicants. Site approval shall be granted for temporary airports only after the requirements of subsection 14-60.005(4), F.A.C., above, have been met. Physical inspection of the site is not required. Additionally, due to the short lead time and duration, as well as urgent requirements often related to a temporary airport the Department will not publish announcement for public review and comment regarding its issuance of a temporary airport site approval order. Temporary airport site approval orders shall take effect concurrent with the date of issuance. (8) Airport Site Approval Order. (a) Issuance. The Department approval of a proposed public or private airport site shall be documented by issuance of an airport site approval order, which shall remain valid for a period of two years from its effective date and which can be extended for subsequent periods of two years, provided conditions for site approval that led to the initial approval of the site have not changed to a degree that would cause the Department to now deny a site approval. Special conditions imposed on the site approval order must be satisfied prior to airport licensing or registration. (b) Revocation. The Department shall revoke a site approval order, if it determines: 1. That the site has been abandoned as an airport site. 2. That the site has not been developed as an airport within two years of the issuance of the site approval, unless revoked by the Department prior to expiration or development does not comply with conditions of the site approval. 3. That aircraft have operated on the site prior to airport licensing or registration, except as required for an in-flight emergency. 4. That the site is no longer usable for aviation purposes due to physical or legal changes in conditions that were the subject of the approval granted. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 330.30, 333.03(2), 330.39 FS. History–New 10-29-65, Amended 7-13- 71, Revised 11-23-72, Amended 7-18-73, 4-18-76, 11-19-81, 1-8-85, Formerly 14-60.05, Amended 12-26-95, 2-11-97, 10-10-04. 14-60.006 Airport Licenses and Registrations. (1) Licensing and Registration Requirement. Except for the exemptions provided in Rule 14-60.003, F.A.C., above, or in the event of an in-flight emergency, the owner or lessee of any airport in the state of Florida shall have either an airport license or airport registration prior to the operation of aircraft at the site. Application for a license or registration shall be made in a format and manner prescribed by the Department. There are no monetary fees required for airport licensing or registration services. (a) Public Airport. Public airports shall be licensed after the site approval is granted by the Department, including completion of the public announcement and physical airport inspection process, if the Department finds the facility to be in compliance with all requirements for the license. The license shall be subject to any conditions that are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. Such conditions shall include the requirement to remove natural growth obstructions, relocate aircraft parking sites beyond runway protective boundaries, or provide aircraft warning lights on structures in close proximity to the runway or potential ground hazards. (b) Private Airport. Private airports shall be registered on the Private Airport Registration and Site Approval Website (http://www.florida-aviationdatabase.com) after the site approval is granted by the Department, including completion of the public announcement process, if the facility is in compliance with all requirements for registration, including self-certification by the registrant of operational and configuration data necessary to ensure compliance with Chapter 330, F.S., and this rule chapter. 1. Private airport owners who have previously received airport site approval through that process will subsequently use their “User ID” and “Password” to access the private airport registration screen available online. 2. The private airport registration screen includes information regarding the private airport: facility name, type of facility, dates related to the site approval process, dates related to the registration process (including expiration date); contact name, address, phone and fax numbers, and e-mail address; facility and runway data. 3. The user certifies the accuracy of the information and data entered on the screen and submits the information to the Department. 4. Private airport owners are encouraged to provide updates of airport and contact information at any time it occurs to ensure the Department has accurate and current information. Any update automatically renews the airport’s registration for a two-year period from the date of update and that information will be reflected on the website, including a new expiration date. 5. Information regarding the facility’s location with respect to county, latitude, longitude, and field elevation can only be updated directly by the Department in order to ensure compatibility of critical data with the FAA’s airport database. Private airport owners should contact the Department to make any changes in this facility data. (c) Temporary Airport. Temporary public or private airports shall be initially licensed or registered, respectively, after the site approval is granted by the Department, if the Department finds that the airport will not endanger the public health, safety, or welfare and the airport meets the temporary airport requirements established by the Department. (2) Airport Licensing. The following provisions apply to airport licensing: (a) Each airport license shall show its effective date and expiration date, which shall be no later than one year after the effective date of the license. However, the Department is authorized to adjust the expiration date of a license to provide a maximum license period of 18 months if necessary to facilitate airport inspections, recognize seasonal operations, or improve administrative efficiency. (b) The airport owner or lessee is responsible for requesting annual renewal of the airport license, coordinating an airport inspection, and correcting any airport deficiencies in sufficient time in advance to preclude license expiration. Written renewal requests shall be submitted to the Airport Inspection and Safety Manager at the address above in paragraph 14-60.005(3)(a), F.A.C., by the public airport owner, lessee, or manager at least 90 days prior to the license expiration date. (c) The Department or its authorized representative will coordinate with the airport owner, lessee, or manager to establish a date and time for the annual inspection. The airport owner, lessee, manager, or a designated representative of the airport shall be made available to accompany the inspector at the time of the inspection in order to participate in the airport inspection. The Department’s authorized representative shall have the authority to conduct an inspection of the airport at any time with or without advance notification to the airport owner, lessee, or manager and with or without being accompanied by the airport owner, lessee, manager, or designated representative. (d) An airport license shall be renewed following a favorable physical inspection, if the Department finds the facility to be in compliance with all requirements for the license. (e) Any anticipated change in ownership of the airport shall be reported, in writing, to the Airport Inspection and Safety Manager in the Department at the address in paragraph 14-60.005(3)(a), F.A.C., above, at least 90 days prior to the effective date of change of ownership or as soon as possible in order to initiate the license renewal process in the name of the new owner and to ensure the airport license is not allowed to expire. (f) All airport licenses issued under this section, together with any conditions attached thereto, shall be posted in a prominent place at the airport, accessible to the public. Any limitations on the use of the airport shall be posted adjacent to or on the license. (g) The Department shall only license an airport that meets established standards unless the Department determines that an airport’s exception to established standards is justified by unusual circumstances or is in the interest of public convenience and does not endanger the public health, safety, or welfare. Such a license shall bear the designation “Special” and shall state the conditions to which the license is granted. (h) Any licensed airport limited exclusively to the specific, reasonable conditions stated on its airport license, necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare, shall be designated a “Limited Airport.” (3) Airport Registration. The following provisions apply to airport registration: (a) The expiration date of the current registration period will be clearly identifiable from the state aviation facility data system. The ability to re-certify registered airport data shall be available at all times by electronic submittal, using controlled access, via the Department interactive website. (b) A private airport registration that has not been re-certified in the 24-month period following the last certification shall expire, unless the Department has adjusted the registration period for purposes of informing private airport owners of their registration responsibilities or promoting administrative efficiency. (c) Registration of an airport shall remain valid provided specific contact information and airport data elements, as required by the Department, are periodically re-certified by the airport registrant; including data related to the airport owner/lessee and facility, e.g., owner/lessee name and mailing address, airport name and physical location address, phone, fax, e-mail, and number of runways with length, width, and surface type. (d) Any registered airport limited exclusively to the specific conditions stated on its airport registration necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare, shall be designated a “Limited Airport.” (4) Private Airport “Licensing Option.” The following provisions are applicable to the option for a private airport to request airport licensing in lieu of airport registration: (a) Any private airport with ten or more based aircraft may request to be licensed by the Department, in lieu of registration. (b) Private airport owners shall provide written correspondence to the Airport Inspection and Safety Manager of the Department at the address in paragraph 14-60.005(3)(a), F.A.C., above, to request this option. (c) Any eligible private airport, choosing this option, shall be subject to all of the inspection and licensing procedures contained in this rule chapter that are applicable to all licensed airports. (d) Department airport licensing standards against which a private airport will be evaluated and will be held accountable in the inspection and airport licensing process shall be the same as those airport standards that are applicable to all licensed airports. (e) In the case of a proposed new private airport choosing this option for inspection and licensing, the site approval process by the Department shall be in accordance with the procedures contained in this rule chapter for all registered private airports. (f) Airports licensed according to this exception shall be considered private airports, as defined in Section 330.27, F.S., in all other respects and shall not be open for public use. (g) Any private airport having been previously licensed at its request under this option, which is later unable to continue to comply with airport licensing standards or is unable to maintain the required number of based aircraft shall be reverted by the Department from a licensed airport to registered airport category. (h) Any private airport having been previously licensed at its request under this option, which subsequently desires to withdraw its prior request to be licensed, shall provide written correspondence to the Airport Inspection and Safety Manager in the Department at the address in paragraph 14-60.005(3)(a), F.A.C., above, to request this private airport be reverted from a licensed airport to the registered airport category. (5) Temporary Airports. The following provisions apply to temporary, public or private airports: (a) A temporary, public or private airport license or registration shall be valid only for less than 30 consecutive calendar days. (b) A temporary, public or private airport license or registration shall not be renewable for any consecutive periods of activation. Recurring requirements for temporary, public or private airport license or registration for an airport at the same general location will be considered by the Department on a case-by-case basis. (6) Conditions for Revoking a License or Registration. The Department will revoke or refuse to allow or issue any airport license or license renewal, or any airport registration or re-certification, if the Department determines that any of the following conditions exist or apply: (a) That the airport registration has not been accomplished within 15 days after the date of expiration. (b) That the Department has not received an application for renewal of an airport license within 15 days after the date of expiration. (c) That the site has been abandoned as an airport. (d) That the airport does not comply with the conditions of the license, license renewal, or site approval. (e) That the airport has become either unsafe or unusable for flight operations due to the physical or legal changes in conditions that were the subject of approval. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 330.30 FS. History–New 10-29-65, Amended 7-13-71, 11-23-72, 6-23- 76, 11-19-81, 1-8-85, Formerly 14-60.06, Amended 12-26-95, 2-11-97, 10-10-04. 14-60.007 Airfield Standards for Licensed Airports. Airports fulfilling the requirements of Title 14, C.F.R., Aeronautics and Space, Chapter 1, Federal Aviation Regulations, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, Part 139, Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving Certain Air Carriers, dated January 1, 2004, incorporated herein by reference, airport certification program shall be considered to meet the minimum standards for licensed airports shown below. All airports licensed by the state of Florida, whether public or private, shall comply with the following minimum airfield standards. (1) Minimum Landing Area Dimensions for Licensed Airports. Runway design must take into consideration the manufacturer’s performance characteristics for the type(s) of aircraft planned for flight operations, as provided by the airport applicant. Runway length must be compatible with the operational and weight characteristics of the aircraft in use. The final decision to attempt a takeoff or landing on a runway of any particular size is ultimately the responsibility of the pilot, who knows the aircraft’s performance capabilities and limitations. However, in order to promote a consistent level of safety throughout the Florida Aviation System, all airports licensed by the state of Florida must comply with the following minimum landing area dimensions, i.e., effective landing area length and minimum landing area width, for the type of landing area shown below: (a) Runway. The minimum effective landing area length shall be 2,400 feet and the minimum landing area width shall be 60 feet. (b) Short Field Runway. The minimum effective landing area length shall be 800 feet and the minimum landing area width shall be 60 feet. (c) Ultralight. The minimum effective landing area length shall be 300 feet and the minimum landing area width shall be 150 feet. (d) Seaplane. The minimum effective landing area length shall be 2,500 feet and the minimum landing area width shall be 200 feet. Seaplane landing areas shall have a minimum water depth of three feet. (e) Helipad. The minimum effective landing area length shall be 24 feet and the minimum landing area width shall be 24 feet. Table 1 Licensed Airports Minimum Landing Area Dimensions Landing Area Type Effective Landing Area Length Minimum Landing Area Width Runway 2,400 feet 60 feet Short Field Runway 800 feet 60 feet Ultralight 300 feet 150 feet Seaplane* 2,500 feet 200 feet Helipad 24 feet 24 feet *Seaplane landing areas shall have a minimum water depth of three feet. (2) Landing and Surface Areas for Licensed Airports. (a) Applicability. The provisions of this section related to licensed airport landing and surface areas are applicable to airport licensing standards and do not apply to airspace obstruction evaluation or permitting provisions in Chapter 333, F.S., “Airport Zoning,” or Rule 14-60.009, F.A.C., “Airspace Protection.” (b) Primary Surface. The “Primary Surface” is a defined surface area that surrounds and protects the landing area. The dimensions of the primary surface vary by type of landing area, weight of the landing aircraft, visibility, and the type of landing approach. 1. Airport primary surfaces are rectangular in shape and run longitudinally along the length of the centerline and on either side of the runway. The elevation of any point on the airport primary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the runway centerline. The consistent width of the primary surface of a runway shall be that width required for the most precise approach for either end of that runway. The following licensed airport primary surface standards apply: a. For a runway that is not paved, that is to be used by an aircraft of any weight, and that has a visual landing approach: the length of the primary surface is the length of the runway, terminating at the end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 250 feet. b. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 250 feet. c. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a non-precision instrument approach: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 500 feet. d. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 500 feet. e. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility greater than 3/4 mile: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 500 feet. f. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility equal to 3/4 mile: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 1,000 feet. g. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a precision instrument approach: the primary surface extends the length of the runway plus 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 1,000 feet. h. For an ultralight landing area, that is to be used by an ultralight aircraft, and that has a visual landing approach: the length of the primary surface is the length of the runway, terminating at the end of the runway and the width of the primary surface is 150 feet. i. For a seaplane landing area with markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area and that has a visual landing approach: the length of the primary surface is the length of the waterway, terminating at the end of the waterway and the width of the primary surface is 250 feet. j. For a seaplane landing area with no markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area: the primary surface is not applicable. 2. Heliport primary surfaces have an area that coincides in size and shape with the designated helicopter FATO. The elevation of the heliport primary surface is a horizontal plane at the elevation of the established heliport elevation. The following licensed heliport primary surface standards apply: a. For a heliport with a visual landing approach: the primary surface length and width are 42 feet each. b. For a heliport with a non-precision instrument approach: the primary surface length and width are 500 feet each. c. For a heliport with a precision instrument approach: the primary surface length and width are 1,000 feet each. (c) Approach Surface. The approach surface is a defined surface area that surrounds and protects the landing approach area. The approach surface is longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline and extends outward and upward from each end of the runway primary surface. The approach surface horizontal component is trapezoidal in shape with the inner width equal to the width of the primary surface. The outer width flares outward to a greater width depending on the type of landing area, weight of the landing aircraft, visibility, and the type of landing approach. Additionally, the outer width of an approach surface to an end of a runway shall be that width required for the most precise landing approach for that runway end. The approach surface also has a vertical component given by a “ratio,” such as 20:1, which means that for every 20 feet measured, horizontally, the vertical component increases one foot upward. A specific approach surface is applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of landing approach existing or planned for that specific runway end, meaning that different approach surface dimensions and ratios can exist at opposite ends of the same runway. 1. The following licensed airport approach surface standards apply: a. For a runway that is not paved, that is to be used by an aircraft of any weight, and that has a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 20:1, the length is 5,000 feet, the inner width is 250 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 1,250 feet. b. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 20:1, the length is 5,000 feet, the inner width is 250 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 1,250 feet. c. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a non-precision instrument approach: the approach surface ratio is 20:1, the length is 10,000 feet, the inner width is 500 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 2,000 feet. d. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 20:1, the length is 5,000 feet, the inner width is 500 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 1,500 feet. e. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility greater than 3/4 mile: the approach surface ratio is 34:1, the length is 10,000 feet, the inner width is 500 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 3,500 feet. f. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility equal to 3/4 mile: the approach surface ratio is 34:1, the length is 10,000 feet, the inner width is 1,000 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 4,000 feet. g. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a precision instrument approach: the approach surface ratio is 50:1 for the first 10,000 feet then the ratio is 40:1 for an additional 40,000 feet, the inner width is 1,000 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 16,000 feet. h. For an ultralight landing area with an ultralight aircraft and that has a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 15:1, the length is 2,500 feet, the inner width is 150 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 625 feet. i. For a seaplane landing area with markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area and that has a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 20:1, the length is 5,000 feet, the inner width is 250 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 1,250 feet. j. For a seaplane landing area with no markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area: the approach surface is not applicable. 2. The following licensed heliport approach surface standards apply: a. For a heliport with a visual landing approach: the approach surface ratio is 8:1, the length is 4,000 feet, the inner width is 42 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 500 feet. b. For a heliport with a non-precision instrument approach: the approach surface ratio is 34:1, the length is 10,000 feet, the inner width is 500 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 5,000 feet. c. For a heliport with a precision instrument approach: the approach surface ratio is 50:1, the length is 25,000 feet, the inner width is 1,000 feet, and the outer width of the approach surface is 6,000 feet. (d) Transition Surface. The transition surface is a defined surface area that surrounds and protects the lateral boundaries of the primary and approach surfaces. The transition surface extends outward and upward at right angles to the runway centerline and the extended runway centerline at a specified ratio from the sides of the primary surface and from the sides of the approach surface. The transition surface has a vertical component given by a “ratio,” such as 7:1, which means that for every 7 feet measured horizontally, the vertical component increases one foot upward. The horizontal component extends laterally a specified horizontal distance or to an unspecified horizontal distance at which a specified height of the vertical component is attained. The dimensions of the transition surface vary by type of landing area, weight of the landing aircraft, visibility, and the type of landing approach. 1. The following licensed airport transition surface standards apply: a. For a runway that is not paved, that is to be used by an aircraft of any weight, and that has a visual landing approach: the transition surface is not applicable. b. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the transition surface is not applicable. c. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs less than or equal to 12,500 pounds, and that has a non-precision instrument approach: the transition surface ratio is 7:1 and the horizontal length is to the point where the vertical height component is 150 feet. d. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a visual landing approach: the transition surface is not applicable. e. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility greater than 3/4 mile: the transition surface ratio is 7:1 and the horizontal length is to the point where the vertical component is 150 feet. f. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a non- precision instrument approach with visibility equal to 3/4 mile: the transition surface ratio is 7:1 and the horizontal length is to the point where the vertical component is 150 feet. g. For a runway that is paved, that is to be used by an aircraft that weighs greater than 12,500 pounds, and that has a precision instrument approach: the transition surface ratio is 7:1 and the horizontal length is to the point where the vertical height component is 150 feet. h. For an ultralight landing area with an ultralight aircraft and that has a visual landing approach: the transition surface is not applicable. i. For a seaplane landing area with markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area and that has a visual landing approach: the transition surface is not applicable. j. For a seaplane landing area with no markers designating the waterway landing and takeoff area: the transition surface is not applicable. 2. The following licensed heliport transition surface standards apply: a. For a heliport with a visual landing approach: the transition surface ratio is 2:1, which extends horizontally for a distance of 250 feet. b. For a heliport with a non-precision instrument approach: the transition surface ratio is 4:1, which extends horizontally for a distance of 350 feet. c. For a heliport with a precision instrument approach: the transition ratio is 7:1, which extends horizontally for a distance of 350 feet. Table 2 Licensed Airports Landing and Surface Areas Landing Area Primary Surface Approach Surface Transition Surface Surface Approach Length Width Ratio Length Width Ratio Distance Inner Outer Not Paved Visual End of Runway 250 feet 20:1 5,000 feet 250 feet 1,250 feet N/A N/A Paved & Aircraft Weight < = 12,500 Pounds Visual 200 feet Beyond End of Runway 250 feet 20:1 5,000 feet 250 feet 1,250 feet N/A N/A Non Precision 500 feet 20:1 10,000 feet 500 feet 2,000 feet 7:1 150 feet Vertical Paved & Aircraft Weight > 12,500 Pounds Visual 200 Feet Beyond End of Runway 500 feet 20:1 5,000 feet 500 feet 1,500 feet N/A N/A Non Precision 500 feet 34:1 10,000 feet 500 feet 3,500 feet 7:1 150 feet Vertical Visibility > 3/4 Mile Non Precision Visibility = 3/4 Mile 1,000 feet 34:1 10,000 feet 1,000 feet 4,000 feet 7:1 150 feet Vertical Precision 1,000 feet 50:1 Then 40:1 10,000 feet Then 40,000 feet 1,000 feet 16,000 feet 7:1 150 feet Vertical Helicopter Final Approach and Takeoff Area (FATO) Visual 42 feet 42 feet 8:1 4,000 feet 42 feet 500 feet 2:1 250 feet Vertical Non Precision 500 feet 500 feet 34:1 10,000 feet 500 feet 5,000 feet 4:1 350 feet Vertical Precision 1,000 feet 1,000 feet 50:1 25,000 feet 1,000 feet 6,000 feet 7:1 350 feet Vertical Ultralight Area Visual End of Runway 150 feet 15:1 2,500 feet 150 feet 625 feet N/A N/A Seaplane Marked Visual End of Runway 250 feet 20:1 5,000 feet 250 feet 1,250 feet N/A N/A Seaplane Not Marked Visual N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (3) Thresholds and Displaced Thresholds for Licensed Airports. The threshold is the beginning of that portion of the runway available for landing. Any obstacle, natural or manmade, in the landing approach path to the runway that, because of its height, penetrates through the specified approach ratio to that runway constitutes an obstruction and a hazard to air navigation. Until the hazardous obstruction is removed, it shall be necessary to adjust the approach path by moving or displacing that threshold point down the length of the runway to some “Displaced Threshold” position, at which safe aircraft passage above the obstruction is assured. (a) For visual runways, a minimum 20:1 approach ratio to the threshold or displaced threshold shall be maintained. If the approach ratio is less than 20:1 to the threshold or displaced threshold, the runway shall be displaced the distance necessary to maintain a 20:1 ratio. If the displaced threshold location reduces the effective runway length below the minimum effective length requirements, that end of the runway shall be closed until the obstruction causing the displacement is removed. (b) For instrument runways, the approach ratio for determining the location of the displaced threshold shall be determined by the maximum instrument approach category; 20:1 for utility, non-precision approach runways; 34:1 for other than utility, non- precision approach runways; and 50:1 for precision approach runways. (4) Vertical Approach Clearance for Licensed Airports. When the landing approach to any runway crosses a road, railroad, traverseway, or waterway, the aircraft landing approach glide path shall provide the following minimum vertical clearance over ground objects: (a) Seventeen feet for an Interstate Highway that is part of the National System of Military and Interstate Highways where over- crossings are designed for a minimum of 17 feet vertical distance. (b) Fifteen feet for any other public roadway. (c) Ten feet or the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse the road, whichever is greater, for a private road. (d) Twenty-three feet for a railroad. (e) For a waterway or any other traverseway not previously mentioned, an amount equal to the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse it. (5) Runway Safety Areas for Licensed Airports. The runway safety area is a defined surface surrounding the runway designed to provide an additional measure of safety by being a specially prepared or a suitable ground surface intended to reduce the risk of damage to aircraft in the event of an undershoot, overshoot, or excursion from the runway. The following licensed airport runway safety area standards apply: (a) Runway (Not Paved). For a runway that is not paved, the runway safety area shall have a length equal to the length of the runway, terminating at the end of the runway, and the runway safety area shall have a width of 120 feet. (b) Runway (Paved). For a runway that is paved, the runway safety area shall have a length that extends the length of the runway plus 240 feet beyond each end of the runway and the runway safety area shall have a width of 120 feet. (c) Ultralight Landing Area. An ultralight landing area shall have a runway safety area whose length is 300 feet and width is 150 feet. (d) Heliport. A heliport shall have a runway safety area whose length extends 20 feet beyond the FATO and width extends 20 feet beyond the FATO. (e) Seaplane. A seaplane landing area shall be exempt from the requirement for having a runway safety area. Table 3 Licensed Airports Runway Safety Areas Landing Area Type Safety Area Length Safety Area Width Runway (Not Paved) End of Runway 120 feet Runway (Paved) 240 feet Beyond End of Runway 120 feet Ultralight 300 feet 150 feet Heliport 20 feet Beyond FATO 20 feet Beyond FATO Seaplane N/A N/A (6) Runway Pavement Standards for Licensed Airports. Pavement Condition Index. The “Pavement Condition Index” (“PCI”) value is an indicator of the integrity and viability of a runway surface with a focus on pavement cracking, swelling, rutting, and depressions. For runway pavement, the value indicates the capability of the runway surface, in contact with aircraft tires, to provide a suitable environment for maintaining aircraft directional control, which may be adversely affected by runway undulations, or for preventing foreign object damage. Foreign object damage can result from pavement spalling, which may dislodge small or large pieces of pavement that could severely damage aircraft control surfaces or propellers, penetrate aircraft wing or fuselage surfaces protecting flammable fuel tanks or other critical components, or be ingested into turbo-jet or turboprop-jet engine intakes with potential catastrophic loss of power during critical phases of flight. (a) The standard measurement of PCI results in seven ratings from “Excellent” to “Failed,” as shown in Table 4, below. Industry standards to objectively and consistently characterize and evaluate runway pavements are available from the American Society of Testing Material as ASTM Standard D 5340-03 “Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys,” dated 2003, incorporated herein by reference. A runway PCI value of 10 or below indicates that the pavement has deteriorated significantly and the runway pavement shall be considered by the Department to not meet acceptable licensed airport standards. (b) Temporary remedies may include displacement of the threshold, shortening the length of the runway to no less than the minimum effective length as shown in subsection 14-60.007(1), F.A.C., or closing the runway until permanent corrective action can be completed. (c) Depending on the number of runways available and the extent of pavement condition index deficiencies, failure to implement temporary or permanent remedies will result in the Department revoking the airport license on the ground that the airport has become unusable due to unsafe conditions per paragraph 14-60.006(6)(e), F.A.C. Table 4 Licensed Airports Pavement Condition Index Qualitative Rating PCI Value Minimum Maximum Excellent 86 100 Very Good 71 85 Good 56 70 Fair 41 55 Poor 26 40 Very Poor 11 25 Failed 0 10 (7) Airfield Improvements for Licensed Airports. All licensed airports shall comply with items (a) through (f), below. Licensed airports that include a seaplane landing area shall comply with items (a) through (g), below: (a) At least one 15-knot, 8-foot long windsock shall be installed at the airport. The windsock shall be lighted if the landing area is lighted. (b) Any aircraft tie-downs or moorings used to secure aircraft shall be located outside of the landing area, primary surface, and transition surface areas. (c) Airport operators shall be required to establish and enforce effective control of unauthorized vehicles and pedestrian access within the aircraft movement areas. (d) Except at ultralight flightparks, an approved 75-foot diameter airport circle marker (segmented circle), including aircraft traffic pattern indicators, shall be installed at airports without control towers, which have other than standard traffic patterns. The segmented circle shall be lighted, if the landing area is lighted. (e) At least two category 80-B-C, or higher, type fire extinguishers shall be available at the airport, readily accessible, operationally functional, bear an unbroken seal, and be located in an area clearly identified to the public. (f) An operational public telephone shall be available at the airport on a 24-hour basis and its location shall be clearly identified to the public. (g) Airports having seaplane landing areas shall have at least one U.S. Coast Guard approved life preserver of the ring or throwing type with a retrieval line attached to each, readily available during hours of operation. (8) Additional Responsibilities for Licensed Airport. (a) Airport hazards determined to exist by the Department shall be removed. (b) Obstructions shall be marked and/or lighted in accordance with Rule 14-60.009, F.A.C., and for those obstructions to which Section 333.025, F.S., applies, shall be permitted pursuant to that section, or may be subject to variance under a local zoning ordinance. (c) The airport licensee shall notify the Department, in writing, at least 60 days before any scheduled construction, alteration, improvements, major repairs, or modification to the size or shape of the landing area is begun. Any such requirements made necessary by emergency or unforeseen circumstances shall be given verbally to the Department, as soon as possible, and be followed by written notification within seven calendar days. (d) The owner or lessee shall maintain the field in a usable condition. If the airport becomes dangerous or is not usable, it shall be the responsibility of the airport owner or lessee to mark the danger area by means of flags or to indicate the closing of such airport or runway by an “X,” clearly visible from the air or in a manner consistent with the exigencies of the situation. The owner or lessee shall report, in writing, to the Department any planned or emergency work in progress on the field and any proposed changes or conditions which might render the field unsafe for use. (e) The owner or lessee of a closed, unlicensed, or abandoned airport shall remove all airport identifying markers and wind indicators and shall place upon the runway or runway intersection a Department approved “closed runway” marking. The Department will cause the airport to be marked if the owner does not properly mark it within 60 days of notice, and will assess such costs to the owner or lessee. (9) Airport Marking. The following airport marking requirements apply to licensed airports: (a) Non-Paved Runway Markings. Markers shall be installed on both sides of non-paved runways at 200 foot intervals along the edge of the usable runway width. Three markers shall be placed at 10 foot intervals on each side of each end of the runway, perpendicular to the centerline of the runway. Each set of three markers shall start at the corner of the runway and run toward the centerline of the runway on the runway endline. Displaced thresholds at non-paved licensed airports shall be marked with at least three markers on each side of the displaced landing thresholds area where the effective runway length begins. The displaced threshold markers shall be no more than 10 feet apart, similar to the runway edge markers, and be placed, clear of the runway, on a centerline 90 degrees to the runway heading. (b) Runway Designation Markings. Runway designation markings shall be white and shall consist of a number and shall be supplemented by a letter on parallel runways. The number shall specify the whole number to the nearest ten degrees of the magnetic azimuth when viewed from the direction of the approach. The size and spacing of the numbers and letters shall only be reduced when space is limited. All numerals except the number “11” shall be horizontally spaced fifteen feet apart. The number “11” shall be spaced 27 feet apart. A zero (“0”) shall not precede single digits. The numeral “1,” when used alone, shall contain a horizontal bar at the bottom of the numeral to differentiate it from the runway centerline marking. Single digits shall be centered on the runway centerline. Double digits shall be centered on the runway centerline at the point that is halfway between the outer edges of the two numerals. Letters, such as “L,” “C,” or “R” for “Left,” “Center,” or “Right,” shall be stacked beneath the number at a distance of 20 feet. The base of the letter or number shall start 20 feet from the threshold or 40 feet from threshold markings. Digits shall be 60 feet tall. The lines comprising the digits shall be five feet wide. Digits shall be proportional and must be between 6 and 7.5 feet wide. (c) Runway Centerline Markings. Runway centerline markings shall be white and shall identify the physical center of the usable runway surface and shall extend the length of the runway. The stripes shall be 120 feet in length. The gaps shall be 80 feet in length. The minimum width of the stripe shall be 12 inches. The stripes shall begin 40 feet from the top of the runway designation marking. (d) Threshold Bars. Threshold bars shall be white and shall delineate the beginning of the runway that is available for landing. The threshold bar shall be ten feet wide and shall extend across the width of the runway. (e) Arrows and Arrowheads. Arrows and arrowheads shall be white and shall be used to identify a displaced threshold. Arrowheads, used in conjunction with a threshold bar to highlight the beginning of the runway, shall be placed five feet before the threshold bar and shall be spaced two feet apart for runways 60 feet wide, 3 feet apart for runways between 60 and 100 feet wide, and four feet apart for runways over 100 feet wide. Arrows shall be provided in the portion of the runway before the displaced threshold. Arrowheads shall be 45 feet long, 15 feet wide, and have stripes 3 feet wide. Arrow tails shall be 80 feet long and 18 inches wide. The overlap between the arrowheads and tails shall be five feet. Arrows shall be spaced 80 feet apart. (f) Holding Position Markings (Paved Taxiways). Holding position markings for paved taxiways shall be yellow and shall identify the location where a pilot should be assured that there is adequate separation with other aircraft before proceeding onto the runway. Holding position markings consist of four lines and three spaces each 6-12 inches wide. The solid lines shall always be on the side where the aircraft is to hold. The two dashed lines and spaces shall be 3 feet long. The markings shall extend completely across the taxiway. The markings shall be installed perpendicular to the taxiway centerline, but may be angled as needed where two or more taxiways intersect at the hold line. Holding position markings shall be placed 125 feet from visual runways serving small aircraft, 150 feet from visual runways serving large aircraft or with non-precision approaches, and 200 feet from runways with a precision approach. (g) Holding Position Signs (Unpaved Taxiways). Holding position signs for unpaved taxiways shall be located outside the primary surface on the left side of the taxiway for a taxiway that is less than or equal to 150 feet wide or on both sides of taxiways that are greater than 150 feet wide. The sign shall consist of the runway designation numbers separated by a dash such that their arrangement indicates the direction to the corresponding runway threshold. The numbers shall be white on a red background. Mounting legs for each sign shall be frangible. The sign face shall be no less than 18 inches tall and 30 inches wide. The runway designation numbers shall be no less than 12 inches tall. The sign shall stand no more than 42 inches high. (h) Helipad. Helipad markings shall be white and are used to mark the intended landing position within the FATO. The marking shall consist of an in-ground letter “H” oriented on the axis of the dominant landing and takeoff path. The “H” shall be a minimum of 19 feet tall and 12.5 feet wide. The vertical lines shall be 16 inches wide. The horizontal line shall be 32 inches wide. (i) TLOF. TLOF perimeters shall be defined by a continuous white solid line 1 foot wide. (j) FATO. FATO perimeters shall be defined with white dashed lines, which shall be 1 foot wide and 5 feet long and shall join to define the FATO corners. (k) Closed Runway Markings. Closed runway markings shall be yellow and consist of an “X” centered on the runway centerline at each end of the runway and at 1,000 foot intervals. The “X” shall be 60 feet across and each arm shall be 10 feet wide and 25 feet long. If the “closed” runway intersects an “open” runway, an “X” shall be placed on each side of the “open” runway. Runway designation markings and runway threshold markings shall be obliterated on closed runways. (l) Common Marking Requirements: 1. Glass beads shall be required for all permanent pavement markings. 2. All markings on light colored pavements shall be outlined with a black border six inches or greater in width. (10) Airport Lighting. The Department does not require airports to be lighted. However, if an airport is lighted, it shall comply with the following standards. The minimum lights that shall be provided are threshold and runway end lights, displaced threshold lights, segmented circle lights, FATO or TLOF lights, and windsock lights. All lights shall be on flush or frangible mounts not more than 14 inches tall. The following airport lighting requirements shall apply to licensed airports: (a) Runway Edge Lights. Runway edge lights shall emit white light except that yellow light is substituted for white light on the last 2,000 feet of an instrument runway, or one-half of the runway length, whichever is less, to indicate the caution zone. (b) Threshold and Runway End Lights. Threshold and runway end lights shall be located on a line perpendicular to the extended runway centerline not less than two feet nor more than ten feet outboard from the designated threshold of the runway. The lights shall be installed in two groups located symmetrically about the extended runway centerline. For instrument runways, each group shall contain four lights; for other runways, each group shall contain three lights. The outmost light in each group shall be located in line with the runway edge lights. The other lights in each group shall be located on 10 foot centers toward the extended runway centerline. The lights shall be red on the inboard half and green on the outboard half. (c) Displaced Threshold Lights. Displaced threshold lights shall be located outboard of the runway. The innermost light of each group shall be located in line with the runway edge lights, and the remaining lights shall be located outward on 10 foot centers on a line perpendicular to the runway centerline. The runway end lights shall be red all the way around. The displaced threshold lights shall be green on the outboard half. The inboard half of displaced threshold lights shall be yellow for an instrument runway and white for a visual runway. (d) Taxiway Edge Lights. Taxiway edge lights shall emit blue light. (e) FATO or TLOF Lights. FATO or TLOF lights shall emit yellow light and shall define the limits of the FATO or TLOF. Both FATO and TLOF lights shall not be lit concurrently. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 330.30 FS. History–New 10-29-65, Amended 11-23-72, 4-18-76, 11-19- 81, 1-8-85, Formerly 14-60.07, Amended 12-26-95, 10-10-04. 14-60.009 Airspace Protection. (1) Airspace Obstruction Permit. (a) Any person proposing the erection, alteration, or modification of any structure that would exceed federal obstruction standards and which lies within the Department’s jurisdictional area of responsibility is required to obtain an airspace obstruction permit from the Department. However, such airspace obstruction permits shall be required only where the proposed site is within a ten nautical mile radius of the geographical center of a publicly owned or operated airport, a military airport, or an airport licensed by the state for public use. (b) An Airspace Obstruction Permit Application, DOT Form 725-040-11, Rev. 02/04, incorporated by reference under Rule 14- 60.011, F.A.C., with all required supporting documentation shall be submitted to: Airspace and Land Use Manager, Florida Department of Transportation, 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 46, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450. (c) In determining whether to issue a permit, the Department shall consider: 1. The nature of the terrain and height of existing structures. 2. Public and private interests and investments. 3. The character of flying operations and planned developments of airports. 4. Federal airways as designated by the Federal Aviation Administration. 5. Whether the construction of the proposed structure would cause an increase in the minimum descent altitude or the decision height at the affected airport. 6. Technological advances. 7. The safety of persons on the ground and in the air. 8. Land use density. 9. The safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. 10. The cumulative effects on navigable airspace of all existing structures, proposed structures identified in the applicable jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans, and all other known proposed structures in the area. (d) The Department shall not approve an airspace obstruction permit unless the applicant submits documentation showing compliance with the federal requirement for notification of proposed construction and a valid FAA aeronautical determination. No permit shall be approved solely on the basis that the proposed structure will not exceed federal obstruction or any other federal aviation regulation. (e) Any airspace obstruction permit granted by the Department shall require the applicant’s compliance with obstruction marking and lighting standards contained herein. (2) Local Government Ordinance. Any local government airport zoning ordinance, concerning airport hazards, adopted in accordance with Chapter 333, F.S., shall require obstruction marking and lighting in compliance with the marking and lighting standards set forth in this rule chapter. (3) Local Government Variance. Any person filing a request with a local government for a variance from an airport zoning ordinance in order to erect any structure, or increase the height of any structure, or permit the growth of any tree, or otherwise use property contrary to the airport zoning regulations shall forward a copy of the application to the Department by certified mail to the Airspace and Land Use Manager at the Department address in paragraph 14-60.009(1)(b), F.A.C., above. (a) The Department shall review the application for local government variance, file a response or waive the right of the Department to respond and provide a copy of the response to the applicant and local government within 45 days of receipt of the application. (b) The applicant shall provide to the Department a copy of the local government decision on the application for variance within ten days of issuance of the decision. (c) Any variance granted shall require the applicant to install, operate, and maintain obstruction marking and lighting in compliance with the marking and lighting standards set forth in this rule chapter. (4) Obstruction Marking and Lighting. Obstruction marking or lighting recommended in an FAA aeronautical determination shall be considered a requirement for the structure for compliance with Department standards. As minimum standards, the Department herein incorporates by reference obstruction marking and lighting standards and guidelines described in the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K (AC 70/7460-1K) “Obstruction Marking and Lighting,” dated August 1, 2000. These standards shall be applied as follows: (a) Objects that exceed an overall height of 200 feet above ground level (AGL), including any appurtenances, or that exceed any federal obstruction standard will be required to be marked or lighted as specifically recommended by the FAA. Marking or lighting of objects lower than 200 feet AGL will be required within specific lateral boundaries of established low level aircraft routes. (b) Objects which exceed 300 feet AGL up to 500 feet AGL within six nautical miles of a licensed public-use airport or military airfield, shall be marked or lighted in accordance with specific federal obstruction guidelines for those heights. The white lighting required for daytime and twilight, for dual lighting with red/medium intensity white systems, shall be medium intensity. The system includes automatic sensors that change between red and white lighting and also vary the white strobe intensity between twilight and full day. (c) Objects which exceed 500 feet AGL, within a six nautical mile radius of a public-use airport or military airfield, shall be marked or lighted in accordance with specific federal obstruction guidelines for those heights. The white lighting required for daytime and twilight, for dual lighting with red/high intensity white systems, shall be high intensity. (d) Objects which exceed 800 feet AGL beyond the six nautical mile radius of public airports or military airfields, shall be marked or lighted in accordance with specific federal obstruction guidelines for those heights. The white lighting required for daytime and twilight, for dual lighting, shall be high intensity. (e) Specific marking or lighting will not be required if both of the following circumstances exist: 1. The object is masked by surrounding objects marked or lighted under these standards, and 2. The FAA specifically recommends deletion of any marking or lighting because of the masking effect. (f) When the FAA recommends dual lighting for objects less than the heights specified in this rule chapter because of the need for greater visual conspicuity, the more stringent FAA recommendations shall be required as a condition of the permit issued. Additionally, when an object does not exceed any federal obstruction standard, but because of its particular location, the FAA recommends marking and lighting, the FAA recommendation shall be required as a condition of the permit. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 333.065, 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 330.35, 333.025, 333.03(5), 333.07, 333.08 FS. History–New 11-23-72, Amended 4-18-76, 11-19-81, 1-8-85, Formerly 14-60.09, Amended 4-19-89, 12-26-95, 8-5-96, 2-11-97, 10-10-04. 14-60.011 Forms. The following application forms are incorporated by reference into this rule chapter and shall be used to apply for an airspace obstruction permit or public airport site approval: FORM NUMBER DATE TITLE 725-040-11 (02/04) Airspace Obstruction Permit Application 725-040-12 (02/04) Public Airport Site Approval Application Copies of these forms may be obtained by downloading from the FDOT Aviation Office website at http://www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/ or contacting the Aviation Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Haydon Burns Building, MS 46, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450. Rulemaking Authority 330.29(4), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 330.29, 333.025, 333.07, 334.044(27) FS. History–New 11-19-81, Amended 1- 8-85, Formerly 14-60.11, Amended 4-19-89, 12-26-95, 8-5-96, 2-11-97, 10-10-04.           FAA ADVISORY CIRCULAR 150/5395‐1A  SEAPLANE BASES            APPENDIX D            Advisory Circular U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: Seaplane Bases Date: 8/6/2013 Initiated by: AAS-100 AC No.: 150/5395-1A Change: 1. Purpose. This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance to assist operators in planning, designing, and constructing seaplane bases and associated facilities. 2. Application. The FAA recommends the standards and recommendations in this AC for use in the design of civil seaplane bases. In general, use of this AC is not mandatory. Use of this AC is mandatory for all projects funded with federal grant monies through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and/or with revenue from the Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) Program. See Grant Assurance No. 34, Policies, Standards, and Specifications, and PFC Assurance No. 9, Standards and Specifications. 3. Cancellation. This AC cancels AC 150/5395-1, Seaplane Bases, dated June 29, 1994. 4. Principal Changes. This revision includes the following changes: a. Update definitions and guidance for filing notices to the FAA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, and state, local jurisdictions, chapter 1. b. Updated site selection guidance in chapter 2. c. Restructured the advisory circular into guidance and recommendations for off-shore facilities, chapter 3, shoreline facilities, chapter 4, and on-shore facilities, chapter 5. d. Clarified the basic components of a public-use seaplane base as suitable water operating area, which in turn, consists of approach/departure paths, designated sea lane, taxi channel(s), an anchorage area, and a shoreline ramp or pier (chapter 1). Depending on user needs, shoreline or on-shore facilities may become basic components (chapters 4 and 5). e. Clarified that the advisory circular deals primarily with float planes as compared to flying boats and amphibian water craft. f. Incorporated selected operational information from FAA-H-8083-23, Seaplane, Skiplanes, and Float/Ski Equipment Helicopter Operations Handbook that relates to the design of such facilities. g. Revised table 2-1 to include additional sizes of seaplane bases. h. Introduced a new paragraph numbering format. Michael J. O’Donnell Director of Airport Safety and Standards AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. THE SEAPLANE BASE ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Explanation of Terms ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Filing Notice of Seaplane Base Landing Area Proposal .................................................. 4 1.4 Notice of Construction or Alteration ................................................................................ 7 1.5 FAA Aeronautical Study of Existing Objects/Structures ................................................. 7 1.6 Seaplane Base Layout Plan (SBLP) ................................................................................. 8 1.7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program ....................................................... 8 1.8 U.S. Coast Guard Approval.............................................................................................. 8 1.9 State and Local Requirements .......................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2. SITE SELECTION............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Seaplane Characteristics ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Seaplane Operating Characteristics ................................................................................ 12 2.4 Site Selection Criteria..................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Approach and Departure Paths ....................................................................................... 16 2.6 Sea lane Alignment ........................................................................................................ 17 2.7 Water Currents and Water-Level Variations .................................................................. 18 2.8 Water Surface Conditions .............................................................................................. 18 2.9 Sheltered Anchorage Areas ............................................................................................ 19 2.10 Bottom Conditions ......................................................................................................... 19 2.11 Bird Hazards ................................................................................................................... 19 2.12 Environmental Factors ................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 3. OFF-SHORE FACILITIES .............................................................................. 21 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Sea Lane - Dimensions and Water Depths ..................................................................... 21 3.3 Taxi Channels ................................................................................................................. 21 3.4 Turning Basins ............................................................................................................... 21 3.5 Anchorage Areas ............................................................................................................ 22 CHAPTER 4. SHORELINE FACILITIES .............................................................................. 27 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Ramps ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.3 Slipways ......................................................................................................................... 29 4.4 Piers ................................................................................................................................ 31 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A iii 4.5 Fixed Docks.................................................................................................................... 32 4.6 Floating Docks (Floats) .................................................................................................. 34 4.7 Floating Barges .............................................................................................................. 37 4.8 Operating Space Between Shoreline Facilities .............................................................. 37 CHAPTER 5. ON-SHORE FACILITIES................................................................................. 39 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Service Apron, Storage/Tie Down Area ........................................................................ 39 5.3 Hangars........................................................................................................................... 41 5.4 Aviation Fuel Service ..................................................................................................... 41 5.5 Hoisting Equipment........................................................................................................ 42 5.6 Marine Railways ............................................................................................................ 43 5.7 Administration Building and Common Public Use Area ............................................... 44 5.8 Parking Areas ................................................................................................................. 45 5.9 Road Access ................................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER 6. SEAPLANE BASE IDENTIFICATION .......................................................... 47 6.1 Seaplane Base Identification .......................................................................................... 47 6.2 Lighting Within the Water Operating Area.................................................................... 47 6.3 Rotating Beacon ............................................................................................................. 47 6.4 Wind Cones .................................................................................................................... 47 6.5 Shoreline Floodlights ..................................................................................................... 47 6.6 Seaplane Base Marking .................................................................................................. 47 CHAPTER 7. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................ 51 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 51 7.2 Preservation of Facilities ................................................................................................ 51 APPENDIX A. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROGRAMS ............................... A-1 APPENDIX B. U.S. COAST GUARD PROGRAMS ............................................................ B-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1. Jurisdictions Controlling Navigable Bodies of Water ................................................... 9 Table 2-1. Recommended Sea Lane Dimensions, Water Depths, Approach Slopes in Feet (meters) ...................................................................................................................... 13 Table 6-1. Proportioned Seaplane Base Marker (with or without a black border) ....................... 49 AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1. Example of seaplane usage at a public recreational area ............................................. 1 Figure 1-2. Example of a seaplane base along Seattle’s Lake Union waterfront ........................... 2 Figure 2-1. Flying boats, a floatplane, and an amphibian ............................................................. 11 Figure 2-2. Seaplane water landing area in relation to a waterfront community .......................... 16 Figure 3-1. Locations of restricted sea lane, turning basins, and taxi channel ............................. 22 Figure 3-2. Anchoring (single anchor line)................................................................................... 23 Figure 3-3. Example of a mooring buoy anchorage area (dual anchor line plus bridle) .............. 23 Figure 3-4. Example of an anchorage area with permanent mooring buoys swing areas. See subparagraph 3-4 (b) and (c) for dimensional A and B parameters .......................... 24 Figure 4-1. Ramp with submerged ramp toe ................................................................................ 28 Figure 4-2. Illustration of a submerged ramp toe ......................................................................... 28 Figure 4-3. Minimum recommended clearances for a private slipway ........................................ 30 Figure 4-4. Example of a small pier with securing cleats ............................................................. 31 Figure 4-5. Example of Alaskan fixed dock with parking ramps ................................................. 33 Figure 4-6. Illustration of a floating dock (float) and marine railway .......................................... 34 Figure 4-7. Example of a gangway in Alaska ............................................................................... 36 Figure 5-1. Illustration of a seaplane base with various capital improvements ............................ 40 Figure 5-2. Example of a private hoisting platform ...................................................................... 43 Figure 6-1. Seaplane Base Air Marker Proportions ...................................................................... 48 Figure A-1. Application for a Department of the Army Permit - page one ................................ A-2 Figure A-2. Application for a Department of the U.S. Army Corps Permit – page two ............ A-3 Figure A-3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Division boundaries ................................................ A-7 Figure B-1. Federal regulations Concerning Private Aids to Navigation, 33 CFR Part 66 ........ B-2 Figure B-2. Private Aids to Navigation Application .................................................................. B-3 Figure B-3. Private Aids to Navigation Application - continued ............................................... B-4 Figure B-4. U.S. Coast Guard Districts ...................................................................................... B-5 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 1 CHAPTER 1. THE SEAPLANE BASE 1.1 INTRODUCTION The seaplane is in the unique position of being able to provide air service which is practically impossible with any other kind of craft. It offers the public the speed of the airplane with the utility of the boat. It has provided a variety of services which has established it as a valuable means of air transportation. Seaplane landing sites, referred to by this advisory circular as a seaplane base, will not supplant the need for land airports to serve scheduled air carrier operations and other flying activities. Note: Photographs are included only for context and illustration, and do not necessarily represent approved design standards or operating conditions. 1.1.1 Benefits Aviation as a whole plays a significant role in the nation's economy and in its transportation network. Every community, whether large or small, needs access to the airways. Seaplanes serve the flying community like a marina serves boating enthusiasts. Those who engage in seaplane flying and related activities use a seaplane base as a center of business and pleasure. It provides an opportunity for charter and concession operators, the tourist industry, and other enterprises, as well as employment opportunities for commercial pilots, flight instructors, aircraft mechanics, and flight activity support staff. At some locations the seaplane base has provided access to water recreation areas while for some communities it helped to supplement major land airport facilities by utilizing close-in or downtown landing sites that were not possible with a ground airport. In other cases, nonscheduled or scheduled intrastate seaplane passenger-service routes have proven desirable where surface transportation by land or water vessel is tedious and time consuming. Figures 1-1 and 1-2 illustrate examples of seaplane bases for a public recreational area and a city’s waterfront. Figure 1-1. Example of seaplane usage at a public recreational area AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 2 Figure 1-2. Example of a seaplane base along Seattle’s Lake Union waterfront 1.1.2 Design Questions In the continued expansion in the field of aviation, consideration should be given to the utilization of the suitable shorelines, lakes, rivers, and harbors which offer natural landing sites for seaplane operations. The design problem concerning seaplane bases poses such questions as: When a community determines the need for a seaplane base, where should it be located? Given that the site has a suitable water operating area, what types of shoreline and off-shore facilities are available? If a community improves its seaplane base with on-shore facilities, what design items are important? What FAA federal forms must a proponent for a new seaplane base fill out? It is the purpose of this advisory circular to answer questions such as these and to assist local communities or persons interested in solving aviation problems regarding seaplane bases. 1.1.3 Community Relationships Although each community and each proposed site is different, a relationship does exist in which the operational use of seaplanes must be coordinated with other users and interested parties of the community. 1.1.4 Components of a Public-Use Seaplane Base A basic public-use seaplane base, which is within a suitable water operating area, consists of approach/departure paths, designated sea lane, taxi channel(s), an anchorage area, and a shoreline ramp or pier. Depending on the necessary documentation, the seaplane base may include other shoreline facilities, such as, docks, to the more highly developed on-shore facilities, such as, an apron, service hangar, repair shop, and buildings for public use and administration (aviation purposes). Chapter 3 discusses the term “water operating area” in detail. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 3 1.2 EXPLANATION OF TERMS The following definitions are relevant to this advisory circular. U.S. Codes of Federal regulations (CFR), advisory circulars, and other publications are available on www.faa.gov. a. Anchorage Area. An area designed specifically for the parking of seaplanes. (Reference: Advisory Circular 150/5300-18B, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards.) b. Aircraft Landing and Takeoff Area. Any area of land, water, or structure used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of aircraft. c. Airport. An area of land or water that is used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of aircraft and includes its buildings and facilities if any (Reference: Title 14 CFR Part 1, Definitions and Abbreviations). For this purpose the term “airport” includes airport, heliport, helistop, vertiport, gliderport, seaplane base, ultra-light flightpark, manned balloon launching facility, or other aircraft landing or takeoff areas. d. Docking Area. A defined area on a seaplane base either fixed or floating, intending to accommodate seaplanes for the purposes of loading or unloading passengers or cargo, or refueling, parking, or maintenance. (Reference: AC 150/5300-18B.) e. Gangway. A movable walkway where people board and disembark decks, piers, and barges. f. Hazard to Air Navigation. Any obstruction to air navigation having a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft or upon the operation of an air navigation facility. An obstruction to air navigation is presumed to be hazard to air navigation until an FAA study determines otherwise. Note: 14 CFR, Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use, and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace, Subpart C, Section 77.17 Obstruction Standards, establishes the standards for determining obstructions to air navigation. g. Mooring. A fixed permanent installation on the water surface used to secure seaplanes. The seaplane may be moored to a floating buoy, a pier, dock, etc. h. Mooring Buoy. A buoy connected by chain or cable to a permanent unmovable anchor sunk deeply into the bottom of a body of water. i. Notice of Landing Area Proposal (FAA Form 7480-1). 14 CFR Part 157, Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and Deactivation of Airports, requires all person to notify the FAA at least 90 days before and construction, alteration, activation, deactivation, or change to the status or use of a civil or joint-use (civil/military) airport. j. Obstruction. Any object, including a parked aircraft, which may hinder aircraft operations or which may have an adverse effect upon the operation of an air navigation facility. k. Obstruction to Air Navigation. An object of greater height than any of the heights or surfaces presented in subpart C of Title 14 CFR Part 77, Standards for Determining Obstructions to Air Navigation or Navigational Aids or Facilities. This includes any object for example a parked aircraft located in navigable airspace. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 4 l. PATON (Private Aids to Navigation). Any marine aid to navigation installed and maintained by anyone other than the U.S. Coast Guard. (i.e., Federal, State, county, city, town government agency, private individual, or company). m. Public-use Airport. Any airport that is available for use by the general public without a requirement for prior approval of the owner or operator. (Reference: FAA Order 5010.4 and AC 150/5200-35A, Submitting the Airport Master Record in Order to Activate a New Airport.) n. Private-use Airport. Any airport available for use by the owner only or by the owner and other persons authorized by the owner. (Reference: latest edition AC 150/5200-35A, Submitting the Airport Master Record in Order to Activate a New Airport.) o. Seaplane. An airplane on floats (amphibious or non-amphibious) or a flying boat (water- only or amphibious) (Reference: AC 91-69A, Seaplane Safety for 14 CFR Part 91 Operators, Definitions). Note: Status of Seaplanes as Vessels determined by U.S. Coast Guard Regulation, Navigation Rules: International – Inland, quotes the following definition: “The word “vessel” includes every descriptions of water craft, including non-displacement craft and seaplanes, used and or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water.” Hence, a seaplane is classified as a vessel once it lands on the water and, as such, is required to comply with the U.S. Coast Guard navigations rules applicable to vessels. Adherence to section 14 CFR Part 91.115 should ensure compliance with the U.S. Coast Guard rules. p. Seaplane Base. A dedicated area of water used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of seaplanes, water taxiing, anchoring, ramp service, possibly with shoreline, and on- shore facilities. q. Sea Lane. A defined path within a water operating area dedicated for the landing and takeoff run of seaplanes along its length. A marked sea lane is defined as a sea lane that has its four corners identified by visual markers such as buoys. r. Turning Basin. A water area used for the water taxi maneuvering of seaplanes along shoreline facilities and at the ends of a narrow sea lane. s. Taxi channel. A water channel used for the movement of seaplanes between shoreline facilities and the sea lane. t. Water Operating Area. A designated area on a body of water deemed suitable to facilitate seaplane operations for landing, takeoffs, and water taxiing. At a minimum the water operating area should consist of a sea lane, a taxi channel, a turning basin (where the width of the sea lane in restricted), an anchorage area or a shoreline ramp or pier. 1.3 FILING NOTICE OF SEAPLANE BASE LANDING AREA PROPOSAL For the purposes of Federal filing requirement, seaplane bases are considered to be airports. In order to establish or modify a seaplane base, notification to FAA by the proponent is required under 14 CFR Part 157, Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and Deactivation of Airports, when no Federal financial assistance has been requested (Federal agreement). This filing requirement applies both to public-use and private-use seaplane bases. When Federal financial assistance is given, the proponent instead must obtain an FAA-approved Seaplane Base Layout Plan by working closely with their FAA ADO or Airports Regional Office. Please see paragraph 1.6, Seaplane Base Layout Plan (SBLP), for details. Filed Notice is submitted on 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 5 FAA Form 7480-1, copies of which may be obtained from the FAA Airport District Office (ADO) or the Airports Regional Office that serves your geographic area. 1.3.1 14 CFR Part 157 Title 14 CFR Part157 requires any person (without a Federal agreement) who intends to do any of the following to notify the FAA of their intent: a. Construct or otherwise establish a new airport or activate an airport. b. Construct, realign, alter, or activate any runway, sea lane, or other aircraft landing or takeoff area. c. Deactivate, discontinue using, or abandon an airport or any landing or takeoff area of an airport for a period of one year or more. d. Construct, realign, alter, activate, deactivate, abandon, or discontinue using a taxiway or taxi channel associated with a landing or takeoff area on a public use airport. e. Change the status of an airport from private use to public use or from public use to private use. f. Change any traffic pattern or traffic pattern altitude or direction. g. Change anticipated aeronautical operations, e.g., from VFR to IFR. 1.3.2 Filing a Notice of Intent When a notice of intent is filed to establish a seaplane base on a body of water, the resulting FAA determination is for seaplanes landing on and taking off from that body of water. In the case of publically-owned bodies of water, the FAA will issue determinations to subsequent proponents for seaplane bases proposing to utilize the same body of water. In these cases, the subsequent FAA determinations may contain limitations that apply collectively to all previous FAA seaplane base determinations. Subsequent determinations, however, do not normally affect a prior proponent's mooring areas. 1.3.2.1 It is not uncommon for a point to be reached where seaplane operations to or from different landing and takeoff areas in close proximity to each other must be coordinated to ensure safe and efficient use of the airspace. The FAA will identify the coordination procedures that must be implemented to prevent traffic pattern overlap of adjacent aircraft landing and takeoff areas and their respective approach and departure paths. 1.3.2.2 The FAA airspace determination is independent of permission granted by local authorities to use the water area. The proponent may seek and obtain permission to use the water prior to or subsequent to an airspace determination. However, local authorities may require an FAA airspace determination as a prerequisite for granting permission to use the water area. 1.3.3 Filing Process - Activation of a New Public-Use Seaplane Base The proponents of all proposed, new public-use seaplane bases should contact the nearest FAA Airports Regional Office or Airports District Office (ADO) and prepare an FAA Form 7480-1, available at http://www.faa.gov/forms/. Proponents should submit the completed form back to AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 6 the FAA Airports Regional Office or ADO. This action may be the first information available to the FAA about the proposed, new public-use seaplane base. 1.3.3.1 Results of your Aeronautical Study. When the FAA receives the completed FAA Form 7480-1, it will initiate an aeronautical study. Once it completes the aeronautical study, the FAA issues an airspace determination letter to the proponent specifying the results of the FAA aeronautical study. There are three airspace determinations: (1) no objection, (2) no objection with conditions, and (3) objectionable. The letter will include a blank FAA Form 5010-3, Airport Master Record (Newly Established Public Use Airports, and advises the proponent to fill out the form and submit it to the FAA after the seaplane base becomes operational). 1.3.3.2 Expect an On-site Inspection. When the FAA receives the FAA Form 5010-3 from the proponent, the FAA Airports Regional Office or ADO will assemble and provide to FAA Airport Engineering Division (AAS-100) an electronic “5010 package” containing, at a minimum, a copy of the airspace determination letter, a copy of FAA Form 7480-1, and the original Form 5010-3. In turn, the FAA Airport Engineering Division will ask the FAA or State airport inspector to conduct and provide inspection results to AAS-100 using the filled out Form 5010-3 by the proponent. If the FAA or State inspector is unable to physically inspect a newly established public-use seaplane base, then AAS-100 will obtain complete airport data from the airport manager or proponent. 1.3.3.3 Receiving your Seaplane Base Location Identifier. The FAA or State airport inspector after inspecting the seaplane base will submit a revised Form 5010-3 to AAS-100. AAS-100 will review the inspection data for accuracy, assign the seaplane base a site number, and forward the Form 5010-3 to the Air Traffic Organization. Air Traffic will enter the seaplane base into the FAA’s National Airspace System and assign it the permanent location identifier. Lastly, the proponent will receive a letter with their Location ID. 1.3.3.4 State Aviation Agency Requirements. When establishing a new public-use landing area, it is advised that the proponent also contact the State Aviation Agency for additional guidance on State aviation requirements. 1.3.4 Filing Process - Activation of New Private-Use Seaplane Bases The airport proponent of all proposed, new private-use seaplane bases should contact the FAA Airports Regional Office or ADO and prepare a FAA Form 7480-1, Notice of Landing Area Proposal, available at http://www.faa.gov/forms/. Proponents should submit the completed form to the FAA Airports Regional Office or ADO. This action is usually the first information available to the FAA about proposed, new private-use airports. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 7 1.3.4.1 Results of your Aeronautical Study. When the FAA receives the FAA Form 7480-1, it will initiate an aeronautical study. Once it completes the aeronautical study, the FAA issues an airspace determination letter to the proponent. There are three airspace determinations: (1) no objection, (2) no objection with conditions, and (3) objectionable. In addition to notifying the airport proponent of the results of the FAA aeronautical study, it also includes a blank Form 5010-5, Airport Master Record (Newly Established Private Use Airports). The letter advises the proponent to fill out the form and submit it to the FAA when the seaplane base becomes operational. 1.3.4.2 No On-site Inspection. When the Form 5010-5 is received from the proponent, the FAA Regional Airports Office or ADO will assemble and provide to the FAA Airport Engineering Division (AAS-100) an electronic “5010 package” containing, at a minimum, a copy of the airspace determination letter, a copy of FAA Form 7480-1, and the original Form 5010-5. No on-site inspection will be conducted. 1.3.4.3 Receiving your Seaplane Base Location Identifier. AAS-100 will review the completed FAA Form 5010-5 for reasonableness and accuracy. When necessary, AAS-100 may seek clarification from the proponent or the appropriate FAA Airports Regional Office or ADO. Upon completion, AAS-100 will assign a site number to the landing area and transmits the original FAA Form 5010-5 to Air Traffic. Air Traffic will enter the seaplane base into the FAA’s National Airspace System and assign it the permanent location identifier. Lastly, the proponent will receive a letter with their Location ID. 1.3.4.4 State Aviation Agency Requirements. When establishing a new private-use landing area, it is advised that the proponent also contact the State Aviation Agency for additional guidance on State aviation requirements. 1.4 NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION Title 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, Subpart C, Obstruction Standards, requires any person who intends to construct or alter any building or structure on, or in the vicinity, of an existing or proposed airport (including a seaplane base) available for public use to notify the FAA of their intent. This action allows the FAA to evaluate the potential impact of such action on air navigation at the seaplane base and other nearby airports. This protection of the seaplane base applies only if their sea lane(s) is outlined by visual markers. This visual identification offers a greater level of safety. FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration is used to submit the required notice and is made available at http://www.faa.gov/forms/. 1.5 FAA AERONAUTICAL STUDY OF EXISTING OBJECTS/STRUCTURES The FAA conducts aeronautical studies of existing structures whenever there is a need to determine their physical or electromagnetic effect on the use of the navigable airspace and navigation facilities. Situations that normally result in an aeronautical study of existing structures include but are not limited to: a. A determination as to whether an obstruction to air navigation has a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace; AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 8 b. A change in an aeronautical procedure at a seaplane base with a marked water operating area; c. A request for technical assistance in the design and development of a seaplane base with a marked water operating area; d. A determination as to whether an object should be altered, removed, marked, or lighted; e. A determination as to whether marking and lighting can be reduced or removed without adversely affecting aviation safety, or whether marking and lighting should be added, intensified, or expanded to make pilots better aware of an object's presence; f. A determination of an existing activity's electromagnetic effects upon a navigational aid or communications facility; or g. A recommendation to the Federal Communications Commission concerning the erection or dismantling of an antenna. 1.6 SEAPLANE BASE LAYOUT PLAN (SBLP) All seaplane base development financed with Federal funds must be in accordance with an FAA approved SBLP. 1.6.1 FAA-approved SBLP An FAA approved SBLP is a determination considering all known obstructions to air navigation and all proposed construction whose exact location and dimensions are identified on the SBLP. Approval of a Federal agreement SBLP includes items shown on the plan, such as terminal buildings, NAVAIDs, lighting, fences, cargo facilities and maintenance or service areas. Structures in industrial area development, motels, storage hangars, and other non-aviation development inside the seaplane base boundary are also appropriate items for inclusion in the SBLP. The SBLP is similar to the ALP described in the latest edition of AC 150/5070-6, Airport Master Plans. 1.6.2 SBLP Approval Approval of a SBLP does not constitute approval of structures unless so indicated on the SBLP. 1.7 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is charged with maintaining and regulating the use of navigable waterways. The U.S. Army Corps' regulatory program concerns the integrity of navigation channels and the quality of the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. Activities and fixed facilities requiring U.S. Army Corps permits include but are not limited to dredging, filling, breakwaters, boat ramps, piers, bulkheads, and riprap. 1.7.1 Appendix A contains the application forms and other information required to apply for a Department of the Army permit. 1.8 U.S. COAST GUARD APPROVAL The U.S. Coast Guard is charged with marking navigable waterways. Markers of the type used to identify sea lanes are classified as private aids to navigation (PATON) and require U.S. Coast Guard approval. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 9 1.8.1 Appendix B contains the application form and instructions for completing the application form as well as addresses of Coast Guard District Commanders. 1.9 STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS 1.9.1 State Approval Many state aviation agencies or similar local authorities require notice or application for the establishment of seaplane water operating areas, to allow issuance of a state approval, permit, or license. Requirements vary and may depend on factors such as: ownership, public or private use, commercial activities, type and number of based seaplanes, and type and number of seaplane operations. Coordination with the state's department of transportation or aviation agency is recommended. It is recommended to always check with Federal or local officials in advance of operating on unfamiliar bodies of water. In addition to the agencies listed in table 1-1, the nearest Flight Standard District Office can usually offer some practical suggestions as well as regulatory information (see FAA publication Aeronautical Information Manual AIM). Table 1-1. Examples of Jurisdictions Controlling Navigable Bodies of Water/Authority to Consult for Use of a Body of Water Location Authority Contact Wilderness Area U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Local forest ranger National Forest U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Local forest ranger National Park U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Park Superintendent Tribal Resources U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs Local Bureau office State Park State government or state forestry or park service Local state aviation office for further information Source: Aeronautical Information Manual 1.9.2 Local Approval Most communities have zoning laws, building codes, fire regulations, and environmental, noise, or similar ordinances. A review should be made to determine whether local laws, rules, and regulations affect the establishment and operation of a seaplane base. Notice: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits are still required in addition to any state or local permits. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 10 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 11 CHAPTER 2. SITE SELECTION 2.1 INTRODUCTION This advisory circular provides site selection criteria based on the physical characteristics of seaplanes, their unique operating characteristics, and the interplay of wind and water current and water depth. Designers will observe because of these differences this advisory circular recommends larger dimensional clearances and separations for seaplane base and their facilities as compared to land airports. 2.2 SEAPLANE CHARACTERISTICS There are two main types of seaplanes: flying boats (often called hull seaplanes) and floatplanes as shown in figure 2-1. This advisory circular primarily deals only with the floatplanes (referred to as seaplanes) with some occasional reference to amphibian aircraft. The characteristics described below from FAA publication FAA-H-8083-23, Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipment Helicopter Operations Handbook, are the more pertinent characteristics used in this advisory circular. Figure 2-1. Flying boats, a floatplane, and an amphibian 2.2.1 Floatplanes Floatplanes typically are conventional land airplanes that have been fitted with separate floats (sometimes called pontoons) in place of their wheels. The fuselage of a floatplane is supported well above the water’s surface. For the purpose of this advisory circular, the term “seaplane” will be used in place of the term “floatplane.” AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 12 2.2.2 Flying Boats The bottom of a flying boat’s fuselage is its main landing gear. This is usually supplemented with smaller floats near the wingtips, called wing or tip floats. Some flying boats have sponsons, which are short, wing like projections from the sides of the hull near the waterline. Their purpose is to stabilize the hull from rolling motion when the flying boat is on the water, and they may also provide some aerodynamic lift in flight. Tip floats are sometimes known as sponsons. The hull of a flying boat holds the crew, passengers, and cargo; it has many features in common with the hull of a ship or boat. 2.2.3 Amphibians Some flying boats and floatplanes are equipped with retractable wheels for landing on dry land. These aircraft are called amphibians. On amphibious flying boats, the main wheels generally retract into the sides of the hull above the waterline. The main wheels for amphibious floats retract upward into the floats themselves, just behind the step. 2.3 SEAPLANE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS The following discussions highlight several operational difficulties that seaplane pilots face as compared to pilots operating land aircraft. As a result, this advisory circular addresses such difficulties by offering larger sea lanes than paved runways and greater water operating areas to maneuver seaplanes near objects (reference: FAA-H-8083-23, Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipment Helicopter Operations Handbook). 2.3.1 No Brakes Many of the operational differences between land airplanes and seaplanes relate to the fact that seaplanes have no brakes. From the time a seaplane casts off or is untied, the seaplane floats freely along the water surface. That is, it is virtually always in motion due to the wind and current effects, propeller thrust, and inertia. This drifting causes seaplane pilots to take deliberate actions to control such movement. Hence, to help pilots maintain safer water operations, this advisory circular recommends extra dimensional space design criteria for taxi channels, turning basins, and for maneuvering seaplanes towards and within seaplane bases located in the water operating area and the shoreline. 2.3.2 Weathervaning Another major operational difference is the effect of the wind to cause an airplane to weathervane while on the water, i.e., yaw the nose into the wind. This tendency, which is less pronounced on land airplanes but very evident in seaplanes, can possibly impact the pilot’s ability to maneuver seaplanes. Hence, this advisory circular addresses this condition by providing design criteria with extra dimensional space for anchoring and mooring seaplanes in the anchorage area (anchors and mooring buoys), tie downs at piers/docks, and for water taxiing along shoreline facilities. 2.3.3 Sea Lanes As discussed in the following subparagraphs, seaplanes as compared to land airplanes must overcome different performance factors during air and water operations. For these reasons, Table 2-1 prescribes recommended sea lane lengths and widths, water depths, and approach slopes tied to varied usages. As shown by table 2-1, the minimum recommended sea lane 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 13 dimensions are at least 2,500 feet (750 m) in length by 200 feet (60 m) in width. This size will accommodate a restricted sea lane width down to the minimum recommended width of 100 feet (30 m) by providing 200-foot (60 m) diameter turning basin at each end. Although a depth of 6 feet (1.8 m) is preferable, a minimum depth of 3 feet (1 m) is adequate for single-engine operations. 2.3.3.1 Landing. When a landplane makes an approach at a towered airport, the pilot can expect that the runway surface will be flat and free of obstructions. Wind information and landing direction are provided by the tower. In contrast for water operations, the pilot must make a number of judgments about the safety and suitability of the water landing area, evaluate the characteristics of the water surface, determine wind direction and speed, and choose a landing direction. Additionally it is quite rare for active land airport runways to be used by other vehicles, but it is common for seaplane pilots to share their landing areas with boats, ships, swimmers, jet-skis, wind-surfers, or barges, as well as other seaplanes. Once landed, water taxiing is more complicated given that seaplanes are in constant motion without the benefits of braking actions. Table 2-1. Recommended Sea Lane Dimensions, Water Depths, Approach Slopes in Feet (Meters) Minimum length Notes 1, 2 Minimum width Minimum water depth Note3 Remarks 2,500 200 3 Note 4 Minimum for limited float plane operations. Approaches should be 20:1 or flatter for a distance of at least 2 miles. 3,500 300 4 Note 4 Minimum for limited commercial operations. Approaches also used for departures should be 40:1 or flatter for a distance of at least 2 miles. 5,000 500 10 Minimum for extensive commercial operations. Approaches also used for departures should be 40:1 or flatter for a distance of at least 2 miles. 10,000 700 15 Generally unlimited. Approaches also used for departures should be 50:1 for a distance of 2 miles. Notes: (1) The lengths indicated in the table are for calm water, no wind, sea level elevation conditions at the standard temperature of 59 degrees Fahrenheit. (2) The length shown shall be increased (corrected length) at the rate of one-half of one percent for each degree that the mean temperature of the hottest month of the year averaged over a period of one year exceeds the standard temperature of 59 degrees Fahrenheit. (3) The length shown needs to be increased by 7 percent per 1000 feet (300 m) of elevation above sea level to compensate for the change in density altitude. (4) Although a depth of 6 feet (1.8 m) is preferable, a minimum depth of 3 feet (1 m) is adequate for single-engine operations. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 14 2.3.3.2 Takeoff. For most seaplanes, the water takeoff run is usually much longer than the landing takeoff run. In a landplane, takeoff distance increases with additional takeoff weight for two reasons: it takes longer for the engine and propeller to accelerate the greater mass to lift-off speed and the lift-off speed itself is higher because the wings must move faster to produce the extra lift required. In comparison for seaplanes, there are two additional factors, both due to water drag. As seaplane weight increases, the floats sink deeper into the water, creating more drag during initial acceleration. As with the landplane, the seaplane must also accelerate to a higher airspeed to generate more lift, but the seaplane must overcome significantly more water drag force as speed increases. This extra drag reduces the rate of acceleration and results in a longer takeoff run. 2.3.3.3 Climb and Cruise. When comparing the performance of a land airplane with wheels to the same seaplane equipped with floats, the drag and weight penalty of the floats usually results in a reduced climb rate for any given weight. Likewise, cruise speeds will usually be a little lower for a particular power setting. This in turn means increased fuel consumption and reduced range. 2.4 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA Paragraphs 2.5 through 2.13 provide proponents site selection criteria for determining a safer and more efficient seaplane base. Note: For federally funded seaplane bases, the sponsor, the federal government, or a public agency are required to hold good title to the areas of the airport used or intended to be used for landing, takeoff, and surface maneuvering of the aircraft, or assures that good title will be required (See Title 49 United States Code § 47106(b)(1)). 2.4.1 Seaplane Base Operations The necessary size of a seaplane landing/takeoff and water taxiing areas will depend upon at a minimum on the following factors: a. the performance characteristics and number of seaplanes expected to use the water operating area, b. presence or absence in the surrounding area of existing or potential obstructions, c. strength of water currents, water depth, wave action, d. shoreline, river, or channel geography, e. local regulations, and f. noise considerations. 2.4.2 Water and Shore Relationships Location of the water operating area and related off-shore, shoreline, and on-shore development will be influenced by these factors: a. presence of other seaplane bases and airports in the general area; b. public accessibility; c. character of development within the surrounding area; d. commercial ship and pleasure boating activities. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 15 2.4.2.1 Meteorological and atmospheric conditions, such as fog, wind, and smoke figure 2-2, illustrates a favorable relationship of a seaplane base to a typical community in general terms and more particularly to the other waterfront activities. Two seaplane base locations are illustrated in this “close” relationship with town businesses, the industrial waterfront area, and the convenience of access routes to the residential areas. In addition, the approach/departure paths and the traffic pattern do not pass over the existing community. Pleasure boating can operate along the west shoreline with safety and without interference or disturbance from seaplane operations. If the community can attract itinerant aviation it would be possible to provide additional shoreline facilities, such as a floating dock with tiedowns, for enplaning and deplaning passengers. Seaplane servicing is provided at the main north hangar facility. In general, river shipping is along the east shoreline with ample seaplane turning and docking area north of the railroad and bridge. This site location further offers protection to both seaplane base sites from down-river currents and prevailing north winds. All takeoff climbs and approaches are over water, thereby providing a higher degree of safety as compared to over land paths. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 16 Figure 2-2. Seaplane water landing area in relation to a waterfront community 2.5 Approach and Departure Paths The recommended location for seaplane approach/departure paths is over water, wherever possible. This site selection criterion permits reasonably safer landings during the approach and during the initial takeoff climb in the event of power failure. This selection criteria further helps to avoid flying over populated areas, beaches, and similar shore development. In terms of approach slopes, the ideal approach path is one that is straight and which permits unobstructed approaches over water at an approach slope of at least 20:1 with ample clearance on either side of the path’s center line. Where commercial service operations are anticipated, it is recommended that the approach slope be 40:1 or flatter to facilitate departures into the approach path. Where a suitable sea lane (within the water operating area) exists but the shore and 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 17 surrounding development prohibits straight-in approach and departure paths, an over-water climbing turn or let-down procedure may be possible. To avoid operational limitations, the approach/departure paths should be clear of obstructions to air navigation (see paragraphs 1.3 and 1.4). For example, approach/departure paths should be clear of established shipping or boating lanes. If an obstruction to air navigation is determined to be a hazard to air navigation and cannot be altered or removed, the FAA will impose seaplane operational limitations, e.g., limit the type of seaplane operations as a means to mitigate the hazard determination. Another mitigating alternative is the practice of lighting or/and marking of evaluated obstructions to air navigation which in turn may preclude such an object as being a determined as a hazard. Thus this practice may alone avoid the need for operational limitations. The latest edition of Advisory Circular 70/7460-1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting prescribes standards for marking and lighting of obstructions. 2.6 SEA LANE ALIGNMENT As previously discussed, the dedicated sea lane used for landing and takeoff operations constitutes a minimum facility within the water operating area. 2.6.1 Unmarked Sea Lanes - Operational Flexibility An unmarked sea lane within a water operating area is the choice of many seaplane pilots. This practice allows the pilot to take advantage of the entire water operating area in order to adjust landing and takeoff operations for the existing water currents, wind direction, and the height of wave action. FAA publications, FAA-H-8083-23, Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipment Helicopter Operations Handbook, provides seaplane pilots in-depth discussions on how to pilot the various landing and takeoff operating conditions encounter by seaplane pilots. 2.6.2 Marked Sea Lanes - Prevailing Winds According to 14 CFR § 77.3, a “seaplane base is considered to be an airport only if its sea lanes are outlined by visual markers.” Therefore it is advisable that the sea lane be designated (marked) with a minimum of two visual markers identifying each end of the sea lane, and aligned to provide maximum wind coverage. With the location of the sea lane ends marked accordingly, a safety benefit is achieved by facilitating the application civil airport imaginary surfaces described in part 77. As with land runways, the direction and velocity of prevailing winds over the surface of the water will be the controlling factor in determining the direction of the sea lane. It is not necessary to consider winds of three miles per hour or less when making these determinations. The designer is alerted to the fact that the influences of approach/departure paths, shoreline, and the strength of the water current need to be considered in aligning a sea lane. This design note is given because the peculiarities of surface currents and winds over water, the channelizing effect caused by shore-line terrain or banks, and the effects of thermal air currents will produce wind conditions over water which will in many cases be at variance with wind data collected from land areas as close as a quarter of a mile away from the shore. Additionally, it may be desirable to limit wind analyses to wind data taken only during daylight hours since seaplane operations are almost nil after dark. 2.6.3 Wind Data Recorded wind observations taken in the immediate vicinity of the site over an extended period of time are the most desirable. When local observations are not available, data from a nearby AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 18 locality or airport can be used. Keep in mind that wind data of this source may not be directly applicable to the site considered, as many on-site factors can change wind conditions considerably. Therefore, it is important that the latter type of data be checked by comparing the observed wind conditions at the proposed water operating area with winds being observed at the nearby location. It is recommended that these comparisons should be made under conditions of high and low wind velocity, from all quadrants, on both clear and cloudy days, and at substantially different temperatures. Information concerning the study and use of recorded wind rose data is available in the latest edition of AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design. Lacking data from these sources, it is advisable to consult local sailing and boating interests or residents of the area who may be able to supply general information regarding the winds in the vicinity of the water operating area. 2.7 WATER CURRENTS AND WATER-LEVEL VARIATIONS 2.7.1 Water Currents It is recommended that the landing and takeoff areas be located where the currents are less than 3 knots (5 mph). Landing and take-off operations can be conducted in water currents in excess of 6 knots but any taxiing operation between the sea lane (or water operating area) and the shoreline facilities will usually require the assistance of a surface craft. Currents in excess of 3 knots usually cause some difficulty in handling seaplanes, particularly in slow taxiing mode while approaching piers, floating docks, or in beaching operations like ramps. Hence, it is preferable to have the current flow away from the dock or floating docks. In some cases undesirable currents may be offset to some extent by pilots by advantageous prevailing winds. Locations of the following types should be avoided: a. Where the currents exceed 6 knots (7.0 mph); b. Where unusual water turbulence is caused by a sharp bend in a river, the confluence of two currents, or where tide rips are prevalent. 2.7.2 Water Levels As a general rule if the change in water levels exceeds 18 inches, it will be necessary to utilize floating structures or moderately inclined beaching accommodations to facilitate handling of seaplanes at the shoreline or water front. Where water-level variations are in excess of 6 feet, special or extended developments to accommodate seaplanes must be made. These developments might require a dredged channel, extended piers or special hoisting equipment depending upon the slope of the shore. It follows that the greater the water variation, the more extensive will be the facility requirements. It is recommended that designers use a listing of tidal ranges that can be expected at various coastal points around the United States to address these factors. 2.8 WATER SURFACE CONDITIONS All evaluations of the water surface conditions should include height of wave action and existence of floating debris. Open or unprotected water operating areas may become so rough under certain conditions of winds and currents as to prohibit operations; hence, the varying water conditions at the proposed site must be investigated. The most desirable conditions exist where the surface of the water is moderately disturbed; having ripples or waves approximately 3 to 6 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 19 inches in height. The average light seaplane (3,000 pounds or less), equipped with twin floats, can generally be operated safely in seas running to about 15 inches measured from crest to trough, while 18-inch seas will restrict normal safe operations of these seaplanes. Larger float- equipped or hull-type aircraft ranging in weight from 3,000 to 15,000 pounds can generally be operated safely in seas running as high as 2 feet measured from crest to trough. At the other extreme, smooth or dead calm water is undesirable because of the difficulty experienced in lifting the floats or bull from the water during take-off. Lastly, the presence of floating debris must be determined. Areas in which there is an objectionable amount of debris for considerable periods of time should be avoided. 2.9 SHELTERED ANCHORAGE AREAS A sheltered area that is protected from winds and currents is recommended, particularly if overnight or unattended seaplane tie-ups are to be made at locations where sudden and sometimes unexpected storms or squalls develop. To facilitate seaplane base growth, a cove, small bay, or other protected area is desirable for use since it offers additional seaplane anchorage or mooring area to relieve piers, docks, and onshore apron tiedowns. Other related information concerning anchorage areas are found in paragraph 3.5, Anchorage Areas. 2.10 BOTTOM CONDITIONS The type and condition of the bottom at the site of a proposed seaplane base can influence the arrangement of the various components thereof, the means of construction of the fixed structures, and the water operation areas to and from the shoreline. Reservoirs and other artificial bodies of water often are flooded natural land areas and frequently are not grubbed (stumps and logs removed) before flooding. This situation causes anchors and anchor lines to foul and, over a period of time, can create a hazard if these submerged objects rise to the surface and remain partially or totally submerged. Obstructions which project from the bottom and constitute a hazard should be removed or, if this is impractical, must be suitably and conspicuously marked to indicate their presence to those utilizing the water operating area. A hard bottom composed of shale or solid rock formations will make the construction of fixed off-shore structures difficult and costly. Anchors also tend to drag over this type of bottom. This leads to the use of mooring anchorage which is a permanently fixed installation. Unless specially designed mooring anchors are used, precautions should be taken by selecting a more suitable anchorage area. Where boulders are found on the bottom, some construction difficulties may be encountered and anchor lines may tend to foul. Mud bottoms ordinarily present little or no difficulty. 2.11 BIRD HAZARDS The location of bird sanctuaries or areas that attract flocks of birds should be considered when seeking and orienting the sea lane (or water operating area). Waterways historically used by large flocks of birds should be avoided. 2.12 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS In seeking approval for establishment of a seaplane base, the permitting authority may require an environmental analysis. This evaluation should include an analysis of the proposals impact on water quality, wildlife, existing and proposed land use, noise, and historical/archeological factors. The design of fueling facilities and storage areas should comply with local regulations and accepted measures for pollution prevention. Federal actions (including but not limited to AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 20 approval of Airport Layout Plans and/or Seaplane Layout Plans), development of flight procedures, installation of navigational aids, etc., are subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as set forth in FAA Order 5050.4, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions. In addition to NEPA and the associated Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, there are several other special- purpose environmental laws that may apply as well. In addition, most states have their own environmental laws or regulations as well, all of which need to be considered and followed prior to establishing a seaplane base. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 21 CHAPTER 3. OFF-SHORE FACILITIES 3.1 INTRODUCTION Most large bodies of water can provide a suitable water operating area with adequate depth, length, and width and taxi channel(s) for seaplane operations plus the placement of off-shore facilities. The basic off-shore facilities include a sea lane, taxi channel, and an anchorage area. The anchorage area may consists of just an site where pilots use single line anchors to secure their seaplanes to the bottom or mooring buoy anchoring sites that use permanent anchored mooring buoys. Beyond the basic offshore facilities, shoreline facilities may be added according to need. See chapter 4. 3.2 SEA LANE - DIMENSIONS AND WATER DEPTHS A sea lane of at least 2,500 feet (750 m) by 200 feet (60 m) is recommended for the landing and takeoff of small seaplanes. The importance for obtaining this recommended minimum width is that it incorporates 200-foot (60 m) diameter turning basin at each end of the sea lane thus, offering seaplane pilots better turning maneuverability. For sea lanes of less than 200-foot widths, referred to as restricted sea lanes, it is highly recommended that both ends of such restricted sea lanes have turning basins of a minimum radius of 200 feet (60 m) as shown in figure 3-1. For commercial service and heavier seaplanes, table 2-1 provides the recommended dimensions, water depths, and approach slopes. Although a depth of 6 feet (1.8 m) is preferred, a minimum depth of 3 feet (1 m) is adequate for small, single-engine operations. The length of the sea lane needs to be increased by 7 percent per 1000 feet (300 m) of elevation above sea level to compensate for the change in density altitude. 3.3 TAXI CHANNELS A taxi channel is a basic, minimum facility of a seaplane base that allows adequate separation for water taxing as shown in figure 3-1. The taxi channel provides direct access from the sea lane to the anchorage area and onshore facilities. When the water operating area permits, the taxi channel should be oriented so that the approach to shoreline and onshore facilities, such as the anchorage area and ramp, pier, will be into the prevailing wind or current. The taxi channel for small seaplanes should have a minimum width of 125 feet (38 m), although a width of 150 feet (45 m) or more is desirable. The stronger the wind and current, the more room it takes to make a water turn. Hence, a minimum clearance of 50 feet (15 m) should be provided between the side of any taxi channel and the nearest object. Although wingspans vary, the minimum wingtip-to- wingtip separation for passing seaplanes using dual directional taxi channels should offer at least 50 feet. 3.4 TURNING BASINS Turning basins as shown in figure 3-1 are extra wide water maneuvering areas to facilitate water taxiing, turn maneuvers, and to accommodate periods of changing wind and current conditions. 3.4.1 Location A turning basin should be provided to offer seaplane pilots an extra wide water taxi maneuvering area to enter/exit an anchorage area and facilities located on the shoreline, for example, ramps, piers, hoisting equipment. For narrower, restricted sea lanes under 200 feet (60 m) in width, it is AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 22 highly recommended that both ends of such restricted sea lanes have turning basins of a minimum radius of 200 feet (60 m). 3.4.2 Clearance The stronger the wind and current, the more room it takes to make a water turn. Hence under these conditions, a minimum clearance of 50 feet (15 m) should be provided between the side of the turning basin and the nearest object. Figure 3-1. Locations of restricted sea lane, turning basins, and taxi channel 3.5 ANCHORAGE AREAS The basic seaplane base has a dedicated anchorage area along the shoreline for securing seaplanes. Anchoring as shown in figure 3-2 is an eas y, inexpensive way to secure a seaplane near the shoreline. Center-to-center spacing of anchors, where small twin-float seaplanes are to be moored, should not be less than twice the length of the longest anchor line plus 125 feet to allow for weathervaning, fuselage and wingspan parameters. For larger types of seaplanes, including flying boats and amphibians this spacing should be increased by an additional 100 feet. In comparison, figures 3-3 and 3-4 show an anchoring area with permanently anchored mooring buoys. Although a seaplane base may offer tiedown capabilities, increased seasonal demand could necessitate supplemental anchorage areas. In all case, it is recommended that the anchorage area be within sight and calling distance from the shoreline or from floating docks, ramps, etc., if possible. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 23 Figure 3-2. Anchoring (single anchor line) Figure 3-3. Example of a mooring buoy anchorage area (dual anchor line plus bridle) AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 24 Figure 3-4. Example of an anchorage area with permanent mooring buoys swing areas. See subparagraph 3-4 (b) and (c) for dimensional A and B parameters 3.5.1 Site Considerations The anchorage area selected should be out of the way of moving vessels and in water deep enough that the seaplane will not be left aground during low tide. With these factors evaluated, the overall size of the anchorage area can then be determined by the number and size of seaplanes and the following conditions. First, the site allows enough room so that the seaplane can swing around the anchor without striking nearby obstacles. Second, it permits unrestricted maneuvering of the seaplanes when approaching the anchorage area. It is desirable that anchorage areas provide maximum protection possible from high winds and rough water. If this is not possible, a shear boom should be considered if seaplanes are to be moored in an area where the current is strong. A shear boom consists of a series of logs tied together at their ends and anchored. Its functions are to create an area of calm water on the downstream side, as well as to deflect debris away from the seaplane floats. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 25 3.5.2 Individual Anchoring – Requirements The space required for each seaplane is determined by seaplane’s length and wing span, the length of the anchor line and, if used, the mooring bridle, under the lowest water level condition experienced in the anchorage area. The length of the anchor line "A" as shown in figure 3-4 should be six times the maximum depth at mean high water. Where seaplanes weathervaning swing is limited, the length of anchor line may be shortened to not less than three times the water depth, provided the normal anchor weight or holding capacity is doubled thereby avoiding dragging of the anchor. 3.5.3 Multiple Mooring - Space Requirements Referring to figure 3-4, center-to-center anchor spacing, "B", for small twin-float seaplane mooring, should not be less than twice the length of the longest anchor line plus 125 feet (38 m). For larger seaplanes, including flying boats and amphibians, an additional 100 feet (30 m) should be added to this spacing. Anchor capacity and spacing may be influenced by bottom conditions (see subparagraph 3.4(d)). 3.5.4 Anchor Considerations Appropriate anchorage selection (weight and shape) depends on intended use and the holding characteristics of the bottom. The length of the anchor line should be about seven times the depth of the water. See figure 3-2 for an example. 3.5.4.1 Bottom Conditions. Common bottom conditions such as sand, clay, or similar materials require anchors that will "dig in" to hold moored seaplanes within designated areas. For bottom conditions having deep, soft, mud and silt conditions, pilots have used mushroom- type or large base-area anchors which will not sink excessively into the sludge. In comparison, for shale, smooth rock or other hard bottoms, a much heavier anchor is required because the weight of the anchor is the principal holding factor. Pilots have used 5 to 10 pound (2.5 to 4.5 kg) cast-iron or steel boat anchors under normal conditions for temporary or emergency mooring. These types of anchors have been used to secure temporary night-lighting buoys or floating lighting devices. To evaluate the holding capability after dropping the anchor, first align the seaplane headed into the wind, and then allow the seaplane to drift backward to set the anchor. At that point, watch two fixed points somewhere to the side of the seaplane, one farther away than the other, that are aligned with each other, such as a tree on the shore and a mountain in the distance. If they do not remain aligned, it means that the seaplane is drifting and dragging its anchor along the bottom. If anchoring the seaplane overnight or for longer periods of time, use a heavier anchor and be sure to comply with maritime regulations for showing an anchor light or daytime visual signals when required. 3.5.4.2 Weight. When computing the weight of permanent mooring or lighting-fixture anchors, the reduction in weight due to their submersion must be considered. The apparent weight reduction is equal to the weight of the water displaced by the anchor. Permanent markers or light-buoy anchors, other than typical boat anchors, should not weigh less than 250 pounds (100 kg) when submerged. Small aircraft mooring buoy anchors should not weigh less than 600 pounds (275 kg) when submerged and should not roll on the bottom. An excellent mooring anchor for seaplanes of gross weights up to 15,000 pounds (6 800 kg) can be made from two large steel drums or wooden barrels filled with concrete and connected with heavy 2 to 3 inch (5 AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 26 to 7.5 cm) diameter iron pipe. This anchor has a gross weight of approximately 2,200 pounds (1 000 kg) and a submerged weight of about 1,320 pounds (600 kg). A single-barrel anchor constructed as above will be satisfactory for anchoring small seaplanes. Three drums may be needed for larger, heavier aircraft. Filled concrete blocks tied together with reinforcing rods will also make a satisfactory anchor. 3.5.5 Anchor Lines In addition to anchor lines being of required length, as previously covered in subparagraphs 3.4 (b) and (c), they must have certain other characteristics if they are to prove satisfactory. 3.5.5.1 Strength. The strength of an anchor line is based on the safe working load being equal to or greater than the gross weight of the anchor. Under most wind and water conditions, a 0.25 inch (6.5 mm) wire rope or chain will be strong enough for mooring aircraft up to 3,000 pounds (1 360 kg) gross weight, and a 0.50 inch (12.5 mm) anchor chain or wire rope will be satisfactory for mooring aircraft up to 15,000 pounds (6 800 kg) gross weight. 3.5.5.2 Effects of Water. Mooring lines of the size indicated will remain serviceable for several years in fresh water. In salt or brackish waters, due to the rapid deterioration of metals, the minimum size should be increased by 1/8-inch (3 mm) unless stainless steel rope is used. A practical application is to attach the anchor line to the end of a heavy chain. This arrangement reduces the strain and shock on the aircraft when riding in rough water or heavy swells. Refer to engineering handbooks for weight and strength characteristics of wire rope and chain for determining anchor line sizes. 3.5.5.3 Metal Fittings. Copper or bronze fittings should not be used in direct contact with steel fittings or lines unless they are insulated. Without such proper insulation, electrolysis takes place leading to metal corrosion. Galvanized screw or pin shackles are recommended at the buoy, thus allowing the buoy to rotate on the anchor line. All hardware should be hot-dipped galvanized. When wire rope is used, the ends should be doubled back over a thimble and made fast with rope clips or clamps. It is customary to use three clamps per connection. 3.5.6 Mooring Buoys Mooring a seaplane to a buoy eliminates the problem of the anchor dragging. Mooring buoys are floating markers held in place with cables or chains to the bottom. Mooring buoys must be chosen that will not damage floats or hulls if they are inadvertently struck during water operations. The mooring site must accommodate buoy swings and seaplane drifting, swinging on its mooring bridle (line connecting the seaplane to the mooring buoy) in as shown in figure 3- 3. The desirable approach to a mooring location is at a very low speed and straight into the wind. Once the site is determined, the permanent mooring installation will consists of a heavy weight on the bottom connected by a chain or cable to a floating mooring buoy with provisions for securing mooring lines. A mooring buoy must first support the weight of the anchor line or wire rope and secondly, flag standards, fittings, and lighting accessories when such additional equipment is used. See FAA-H-8083-23, Seaplane, Skiplane, and Float/Ski Equipment Helicopter Operations Handbook, for an in-depth discussion of buoys. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 27 CHAPTER 4. SHORELINE FACILITIES 4.1 INTRODUCTION Shore-line facilities are partly on land and in the water. These installations perform two general functions: (1) enable servicing, loading and unloading, handling and tying-up facilities for seaplanes without removing them from the water, and (2) provide hauling-out facilities for removing seaplanes from the water. Facilities along the shoreline, which vary according to need and topography, range from a simple wood-plank ramps and floating deck to the more elaborate piers, fixed docks, and barges, and possibly marine rail (topography). The types, size, and arrangement of these various facilities will be determined by the water and wind conditions, the topography of the land adjacent to the shoreline, the configuration and conditions of the bottom of the water operating area, and the number and type of seaplanes and amphibian airplanes to be moored, docked, or removed from the water. 4.2 RAMPS A ramp as shown in figures 4-1 and 4-2 is a sloping platform extending well under the surface of the water that vary widely in size, shape, and construction materials, e.g. from rough logs to heavy-duty wood decks, to less desirable steel, or concrete structures. The simplest ramp consists of a wood plank platform approximately 15 by 20 feet (5 m by 6 m) laid on a sloping shore, with up to half of its length in the water to permit small seaplanes to taxi up to, onto, and out of the water. If the ramp is wood, the seaplane can be slid up or down on the keels of the seaplane’s floats, provided the surface of the ramp above the water level is wet. Concrete boat ramps are generally not suitable for seaplanes. Ramps are known to be usually quite slippery, so pilot and passengers must be very cautious of their footing when walking on the ramp. 4.2.1 Location Because ramps are the transition point from water to land, the site should offer a minimum width of 100 feet (30 m) of unobstructed water operating area (a turning basin) directly offshore from the ramp in the direction from which approaches are normally made (see figure 3-1). 4.2.2 Design Concept Ramps are of fixed or hinged type construction having predetermined lengths with a submerged ramp toe (entrance point for seaplanes.) Fixed ramps as compared to hinged ramps are more common but become relatively more costly in shallow areas or where the water level variation exceeds 8 feet (2.4 m). One factor increasing the cost is the need for longer ramps (see subparagraph 4.1 (c) Slope). Ordinarily, piling or piers are commonly used to support the stringers of fixed ramps. 4.2.2.1 Fixed ramps are secured to a stable on-shore structure in some cases a seawall and usually weighted down or attached to a fixed underwater footing by the ramp toe. 4.2.2.2 Hinged ramps are allowed to rise and fall with the tide by means of a hinge on the shore end, while the ramp toe end is buoyed to a predetermined depth below the mean low water level. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 28 Figure 4-1. Ramp with submerged ramp toe Figure 4-2. Illustration of a submerged ramp toe 4.2.3 Length The overall length of the ramp is determined by two principle factors: the ramp slope and depth of the submerged ramp toe. 4.2.3.1 Slope. The slope of a ramp should not be greater than 6:1, with flatter slopes ranging down to 10:1 being more desirable. Slopes flatter than 10:1 are usually too long and costly to construct. Ramps intended to serve tri-gear amphibian airplanes should not be steeper than 8:1 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 29 since, with steeper slopes, the hull of some amphibian airplanes may drag on the ramp as the craft enters the water. 4.2.3.2 Submerged Ramp Toe. All ramps should have their ramp toe below the water level during mean low tide as shown in figure 4-1. To determine the amount of submergence, it is recommended that the designer (user) determine the maximum draft of the seaplane(s) using this feature. In many cases, a 4-foot (1.2 m) submerged depth of ramp toe will provide sufficient clearance for most waterborne airplanes. A 3-foot (1 m) depth will accommodate all but the heaviest types of amphibian airplanes. An 18-inch (45 cm) depth should be adequate for small, light seaplanes. In all cases, depth dimension should be established based on the mean low tide datum in that locality. 4.2.4 Width In figuring the ramp width, the designer needs to use the outside-to-outside float dimensions of seaplanes and the treads of amphibian airplanes. For public seaplane facilities, use the minimum practical width dimension that is based on the largest seaplane or amphibian being accommodated plus additional space on either side of the ramp. This minimum practical width allows for (1) wind/current drifting when pilots approach the ramp toe and (2) a safer working space for personnel handling a craft on the inclined ramp. 4.2.4.1 A ramp width of 30 to 40 feet (9 to 12 m) will accommodate generally all seaplanes and amphibian airplanes in most wind, current, and tidal conditions. The Seaplane Pilots Association Ramp reports that the ramp width determination does not necessitate consideration of the wheel tread of present-day float airplane dollies. Normally, the dolly wheels are spaced to fall between the floats, and in cases where the wheels are outside, nearly all treads are 16 feet or less. 4.2.4.2 For smaller seaplanes and amphibious airplane of gross weights up to approximately 15,000 pounds (6,820 kg), the above ramp width may be reduce to 15 feet (4.5 m) when the site offers relatively calm water and wind conditions. For more adverse conditions, pilots of such small seaplanes and amphibian airplanes should be able to make an unattended ramp approach after adding an additional 5 feet (1.5 m) to the 15-foot width. 4.2.5 Decking Decking planks can be laid diagonally or at right angles to the line of travel. Planks should be placed rough side up with a 0.5 inch (1.3 cm) space between the planks to facilitate drainage and expansion. When laid at right angles to the line of travel, the up-ramp edge of each plank may be raised up to 1 inch (2.5 cm) to permit the hull of the craft to slide easily and still provide good footing for people walking on the ramp. It is highly recommended that fasteners - bolts, nails, and spikes - used to attach the decking planks be countersunk to avoid damage to floats or tires. 4.3 SLIPWAYS Seaplane owners may want a private slipway in which to berth their seaplane. Slipways are commonly rectangular in shaped berths form by dredging the shore line. Besides being economical, they often need no specially constructed sides or ends. Figure 4-3 illustrates an example of a slipway. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 30 Figure 4-3. Minimum recommended clearances for a private slipway 4.3.1 Location A slipway should be where the variation in the water level is not greater than 2 feet (0.6 m) while maintaining a minimum water depth between the submerged ground bottom and mean low tide of not less than 2 feet (0.6 m). 4.3.2 Dimensions The inside dimensions of the slipway should be 2 to 3 feet (0.6 to 1 m) wider than the seaplane’s floats and 3 to 4 feet (1 to 1.2 m) longer than the rudder-down float length. 4.3.3 Features Some owners of a slipway install agate to reduce wave action. Regardless of the degree of wave action, slipways, some form of bumpers, made of materials such as expanded polystyrene, old 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 31 automobile tires, cut strips of tires, etc., should be attached to inside of the front wall, side walls, and, if provided, the gate to prevent damage to the seaplane’s floats. Additionally, it is advisable that the slipway have some means to secure the seaplane while in the slipway, for example cleats or tie downs. 4.4 PIERS Piers or fixed over-water structures as shown in figure 4-4 may be used where the variation in water level is 16 inches (45 cm) or less. The length of the pier should extend into the water to a point where the water depth is adequate for the types of seaplanes being handled, usually when the depth at mean low water level is at least 3 feet (1 m). If the facility is to adequately serve the public, requirements contained in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines should be satisfied. Figure 4-4. Example of a small pier with securing cleats 4.4.1 Location A minimum of 100 feet (30 m) of unobstructed water operating area or a turning basin should be available in the direction from which approaches are normally made to the pier. At those locations where timber piles can be used, they are the most economical type of construction. Water jetting and pile driving are common methods of setting piles. Piers should be located so that access to them by the public will not require the public to cross the land-side apron or hangar area. Since piers are constructed with decks above mean high water, most of the timber supporting members will be subject to alternate cycles of wetting and drying. To prevent decay, AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 32 creosote or similarly treated timbers must be used. See paragraph 7.2 for preservation methods. Urethane, epoxy, and shellac are acceptable sealers for all creosote treated wood, and should be used to prevent tracking creosote. 4.4.2 Design Concepts General design for a pier is to incorporate an access walkway or gangway that is at least 5 feet in width – normally 8 to 10 feet (2.5 to 3 m) - with hand railings on both sides ending with an open- decked handling area of approximately 30 by 50 feet. The length of the pier should extend into the water to a point where the water depth is adequate for the types of aircraft to be handled, usually when the depth at mean low water level is at least 3 feet (1 m). An open-decked handling area of this size provides tie-up space for four small or three large seaplanes. On extra- long piers, where the walking distance is too great for convenient handling of service equipment, a small storage shed may be located near the open decked handling area. If provided, fueling and lubrication facilities should also be located at or towards the end of the pier. The supporting timbers and decking of fixed structures used for passengers, cargo operations, etc., need to be designed to support the anticipated live loads (see local building codes). Decking spaced with a 1/2 inch (1.3 cm) gap between planks will allow for drainage and expansion. 4.4.3 Obstruction Free Decks The surface of the fixed dock should be free of tall objects to permit the wings of seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come alongside the pier for berthing. For example, an unobstructed dock surface of 21 feet (6.5 m) from the pier’s edge will provide the wing clearance for most seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come along safely and tie down. 4.4.4 Tie Down Methods An appropriate number of cleats along the open areas of the pier should be provided along the sides of the deck to secure seaplanes. If the pier has no side handrails, a continuous 4 by 4 inch (10 cm by 10 cm) wood rail, raised approximately 2 inches (5 cm) above the deck, commonly called bull rail or tie rail, is recommended. Bull rails should have cleats and be secured by long lag bolts to pier’s cross-members or logs. Corner posts, if provided, should extend slightly above the deck to serve as bollards. Additionally, bumpers of sufficient length installed along the sides of the structure and extending below the edge of the deck are recommended to prevent damage to the floats of seaplanes. 4.5 FIXED DOCKS The two most common docks used at seaplane bases are fixed decks and floating docks as shown in figure 4-5. 4.5.1 Location It is recommended that fixed docks have a minimum of 100 feet (30 m) of unobstructed water operating area or a turning basin available in the direction from which approaches are normally made to the fixed dock. It is preferable that fixed docks be located so that seaplanes have access to two sides. Such placement allows seaplanes to be secured on the shore side of the fixed dock during inclement weather, i.e., the fixed dock functions as a breakwater. If the facility is to adequately serve the public, requirements contained in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines should be satisfied. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 33 Figure 4-5. Example of Alaskan fixed dock with parking ramps 4.5.2 Obstruction Free Decks The surface of the fixed dock should be free of tall objects to permit the wings of seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come alongside the dock for berthing. For example, an unobstructed dock surface of 21 feet (6.5 m) from the dock’s edge will provide the wing clearance for most seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come along safely and tie down. 4.5.3 Dimensions Fixed dock dimensions are determined by the number of seaplanes simultaneously using or projected to use the dock. In determining the number of berths alongside the dock, use the length of design craft length plus 20 feet (6 m) to offer clearance both fore and aft. A dock should be wide enough to allow seaplanes to dock on opposite sides with at least a 10-foot (3 m) wingtip-to-wingtip clearance. 4.5.4 Tie Down Methods An appropriate number of cleats along the open areas of the dock should be provided along the sides of the deck to secure seaplanes. If the dock has no side handrails, a continuous 4 by 4 inch (10 cm by 10 cm) wood rail, raised approximately 2 inches (5 cm) above the deck, commonly called bull rail or tie rail, is recommended. Bull rails should have cleats and be secured by long lag bolts to pier’s cross-members or logs. Corner posts, if provided, should extend slightly above the deck to serve as bollards. Additionally, bumpers of sufficient length installed along the sides of the structure and extending below the edge of the deck are recommended to prevent damage to the floats of seaplanes. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 34 4.6 FLOATING DOCKS (FLOATS) Floating docks, commonly referred to as “floats,” are commonly connected to the shore by a gangway thereby offering the greatest flexibility in providing docking facilities shown in figure 4-6. This type of facility rides with the wave actions and therefore is equally satisfactory in areas of great or negligible variations in water-levels. To permit this movement, universal action must be provided in anchoring and attaching floats together. Figure 4-6 shows various types of floats for docking. Figure 4-6. Illustration of a floating dock (float) and marine railway 4.6.1 Flotation materials A variety of materials have been used to provide buoyancy for floats, e.g., logs, milled timber, polystyrene billets, fiberglass, and steel drum containers. 4.6.1.1 Polystyrene billets have proven to be satisfactory buoyancy devices for floats. The planks should be evenly distributed, rather than piled at concentrated points, under the superstructure. A barrier of 6 mil (0.15 mm) black polyethylene sheeting should be placed between all treated timber and flotation material contact surfaces. The load supporting characteristics of polystyrene or styrofoam is approximately 50 pounds per cubic foot (800 kilograms per cubic meter) of material. A common billet size is 10 inches by 20 inches (25 by 50 cm) by 9 feet (3 m). Further data on this material may be obtained from the manufacturers. It is recommended that foam planks be enclosed with woven galvanized wire to prevent damage from aquatic animals and sea gulls. Polystyrene deteriorates when exposed to petroleum products, gas spills, etc. 4.6.1.2 Fifty-five gallon steel drums are commonly used as flotation devices. Drums should be placed symmetrically around the perimeter of the float to ensure stability. They are fastened to 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 35 the float by steel straps of sufficient length to extend around the drum and main framing members of the float. Foam, fiberglass, plywood boxes, and steel drum floats are susceptible to damage where deadheads or strong currents prevail. Steel drums have a short life expectancy in salt water. The pilot should be aware of the corrosive effect of galvanic action caused by dissimilar metals. Securing the aircraft to steel or metal drums, by a chain or wire rope, will start a galvanic action that will corrode the aluminum floats. Satisfactory floats can be improvised by using life rafts, small floating docks, pontoons, and similar devices which can be obtained in the open market. 4.6.1.3 Where relatively large and straight timber is available, logs may be used to construct a raft-type float. 4.6.2 Dimensions Float dimensions are determined by the number of seaplanes simultaneously using or projected to use the float. In determining the number of berths alongside the float, use the length of design craft length plus 20 feet (6 m) to offer clearance both fore and aft. A float should be wide enough to allow seaplanes to dock on opposite sides with at least a 10-foot (3 m) wingtip-to- wingtip clearance. Floats as narrow as 7 feet (2 m) have been used where a long, floating dock parallels the shoreline. Floats are usually constructed from locally available materials. 4.6.3 Deck Free Surfaces The surface of the float(s) should be free of tall objects to permit the wings of seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come alongside the dock for parking. For example, an unobstructed dock surface of 21 feet (6.5 m) from the dock’s edge will provide the wing clearance for most seaplanes or small amphibian airplanes to come along safely and tie down. 4.6.4 Connecting Walkways (Gangways) Floats are usually connected to the shore or a pier with a gangway an example shown in figure 4- 7. The length of the access platform is determined by the maximum variation in the water-level. A slope ratio of 2.75:1 is the maximum for safe and easy walking and to prevent the handrails from becoming an obstruction to wings. Common practice is for gangways to be at least 15 feet in length and at least 5 feet in width. Hand rails, preferably on both sides of the gangway, should be provided to assist persons using the gangway. Floats having a gangway that is less than 5 feet (1.5 m) in width should have longitudinally spaced outriggers every 8 to 10 feet (2.5 to 3 m) to prevent excessive rolling of the walking surface. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 36 Figure 4-7. Example of a gangway in Alaska 4.6.5 Tie Down Methods An appropriate number of cleats along the open areas of the dock should be provided along the sides of the deck to secure seaplanes. If the dock has no side handrails, a continuous 4 by 4 inch (10 cm by 10 cm) wood rail, raised approximately 2 inches (5 cm) above the deck, commonly called bull rail or tie rail, is recommended. Bull rails should have cleats and be secured by long lag bolts to pier’s cross-members or logs. Corner posts, if provided, should extend slightly above the deck to serve as bollards. Additionally, bumpers of sufficient length installed along the sides of the structure and extending below the edge of the deck are recommended to prevent damage to the floats of seaplanes. 4.6.6 Combined Float/Ramps Floats connected to a master float are sometimes equipped with equipped with ramps at one or both ends. This type of float is usually constructed at right angles to the master float. A 144 by 40-foot (44 by 12 m) deck, with 10-foot (3 m) wide floats, and 15-foot (4.5 m) ramps on both 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 37 sides can be used for seaplane storage. Additional docks or floats can be added as needed. Also, a long, narrow float with ramps on both sides is adequate for mooring or tying down light, single-engine floatplanes. 4.7 FLOATING BARGES A barge anchored offshore can make an excellent seaplane facility by providing some form of public access when the desired location for shoreline facilities is not practicable or possible. To increase this option’s serviceability, a barge can be fitted with a floating dock for tying seaplanes and/or a ramp. Larger barges occasionally have a lounge, service shop(s), possibly offices on board. The barge may be anchored directly to the shore or to a pier that provides booms and a gangway or anchored offshore in a fixed position that provide some means for the public to reach the facility. 4.8 OPERATING SPACE BETWEEN SHORELINE FACILITIES The desired clearances between the various docking and pier units, barges, and ramps obviously will have a decided influence on their arrangement and location. Each of these units should be so located that a seaplane may approach and tie up in anyone of the available berths when adjacent units are occupied. 4.8.1 When seaplanes are operated between such units under their own power, the recommended minimum separation between the designated edge of the turning basin and the near faces of adjacent units (fixed docks, piers, floats, ramps, or barges) is 50 feet because a water-borne aircraft can normally be taxied safely past obstructions as close as about one half of its wingspan. 4.8.2 Where seaplanes are moved by hand between adjacent units, the separation between the designated edge of the turning basin and these adjacent units may be less than 50 feet to facilitate the handling process. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 38 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 39 CHAPTER 5. ON-SHORE FACILITIES 5.1 INTRODUCTION Designers of a public-use seaplane base are recommended to conducts the following assessments before considering the installations of on-shore facilities. The addition of shoreline facilities range from simple aprons with tiedowns and public parking to moderate facilities that may include fueling, hangar, service repair shop, and a public building, to a seaplane base with various capital improvements as illustrated in figure 5-1. 5.1.1 User Needs The needs of the seaplane users will determine if and what types of on-shore facilities are necessary at a public seaplane base. Public on-shore facilities commonly range from a service apron with storage/tiedown areas, marine fueling, basic public facilities (rest rooms/chemical toilets, public parking), and possibly a marine store, hangar, building serving the public common area and/or an administrative building. 5.1.2 Shoreline Conditions The most desirable locations have a moderately sloping shoreline and a shoreline water depth suitable to permit both water and land operations as close to the shoreline as possible. Sites with excessive fluctuations in water levels are not as desirable since this condition usually requires more expensive shoreline installations or may even prohibit water taxiing operations during low tide. Also, sites with steep shoreline topography may cause a ramp to be unsuitable; thereby it becomes necessary for hoisting equipment or a marine railway to hoists seaplanes from the water onto a land apron. 5.1.3 Landside Conditions Any landside assessment should include at least three investigations. First: the availability of utilities such as electricity, water, telephone/cell phone coverage, and sewage. The basic public seaplane base may not require all utilities, but it is recommended that water and sanitary facilities of some sort be provided for at all locations. In remote rural areas, established water lines and sewerage facilities will likely be out of the question. If such is the case, well water and chemical toilet units are feasible. Check with the state or local sanitary codes when considering the installation of water and sanitary facilities. Second: availability for road access to the nearest community. Third: adequate ground space for the total space requirements of identified installations. No site for an on-shore development should be given serious consideration until utilities are accessed and it is known that adequate ground space exists for all the decided installations. Lastly, for public safety and convenience, certain landside installations – administrative building, public areas, parking, marine store – should be separated from airside facilities – apron, tie-down, hangars, and other incidental activity areas - either by a buffer zone or by fencing. 5.2 SERVICE APRON, STORAGE/TIE DOWN AREA These features will occupy more space than any other on-shore installations. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 40 5.2.1 Location The desirable location is near ramps or where hoisted seaplanes onto the land have a short, direct route to the service apron and tiedown areas with minimum taxing conflicts with other seaplane movements. For safety and convenience of the public, they should be separated from other incidental activities on the site, either by adequate buffer space, fencing, or both. For example, every effort should be made to locate ramps, floating docks and piers so that access to them by the public will not require crossing the service apron, tie down areas, or hangar area. Figure 5-1. Illustration of a seaplane base with various capital improvements 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 41 5.2.2 Size The amount of spaced required for a service apron and a tiedown/storage area will depend upon the number and types of aircraft that are to be accommodated. Designers should use the internet to obtain actually dimensions of seaplanes to determine the space required for taxiing, turning, and storing the seaplanes. In determining the overall space requirement, it is recommended to also include a conservative estimate for itinerant parking-loading or tiedown positions. 5.3 HANGARS Many standard types of hangars used for land-based aircraft are adaptable for use by waterborne aircraft. 5.3.1 Location Hangars should be located in a functional and orderly manner. That is, determine how seaplanes using ramps or being hoisted onto the land can have a direct route to the hangar without interfering tiedown areas, any common public areas, and eliminate as much as possible taxing conflicts with other seaplane movements. The objective is to avoid relocation of parked seaplanes. Both storage and repair hangars should likewise be located so that delivery of materials and access by service personnel will not conflict with seaplane movements. 5.3.2 Size The space required for service hangars will depend upon the number and the type of aircraft that are to be accommodated. Sufficient additional space needs to be provided for taxiing, turning, and temporarily parking of seaplanes. 5.4 AVIATION FUEL SERVICE Where aviation fuel is provided at a public seaplane base, care must be taken to ensure that the storage and delivery systems are safe and that precautions are taken to minimize the possibility of spills and the resulting adverse environmental effects of a fuel spillage. Tank construction and piping must conform to the US Environmental Protection Agency, state, and local regulations plus applicable fire safety requirements. The capacity of this installation should account for the number of seaplanes (tenant and itinerant users) likely to require fuel and the convenient frequency of resupplying it. 5.4.1 Precautions The following precautions should be taken to minimize the entry of water into storage tanks through improperly closed or leaking openings. 5.4.1.1 All tank openings subject to frequent opening and closing should terminate above ground, using recommended pipe extensions or spools. 5.4.1.2 Flush-type tank openings in paved areas should be kept water tight. Inspection and maintenance manholes that are subject to frequent opening should have flanged spool covers. 5.4.2 Dike Above ground tanks are recommended to be surrounded by a dike designed to applicable regulations. If none exists, the dike needs to retain the full tank capacity of a single tank, or the AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 42 capacity of the largest, plus 10 percent of the total capacity of the remaining tanks where more than one tank is installed. The dike should be constructed of impervious non-organic soil with a plastic, liquid tight membrane. A drainage system, provided within the dike, should be designed to remove surface water and to discharge it into a drainage system capable of disposing of the fuel and water mixture in a safe manner. Drains should normally be closed. 5.4.3 Fuel Dispensing System A fuel dispensing system usually consists of a pump, motor, strainer, meter, hose reel, hose, nozzle, automatic and manual control switches, and three-point, static discharge, electrical grounding equipment, all located above ground. The grounding and bonding system should provide electrical continuity between all metallic or conductive components; should have both ground and bonding wires, and clamps adequate to facilitate prompt, definite electrical ground connection between hose nozzle/pit/cabinet, and seaplanes being fueled. A pit or cabinet should be permanently, electrically grounded. The hose reel, from an environmental and safety point of view, is an important element of this system. Ideally, an electrically operated rewind wheel should be provided to discourage the practice of "stringing out" the hose along the dock. A 5 gallon (19 l) drip pan located below the rewind reel will collect residual fuel discharge from the nozzle. Federal, state, and local codes provide additional installation requirements. Advisory Circular 150/5230-4, Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, Training, and Dispensing on Airports, and applicable National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards also provide useful information. 5.5 HOISTING EQUIPMENT Types of hoisting equipment and their use vary with the operating needs of the individual site. They are frequently needed where a public use seaplane base is developed along a high seawall, bulkhead, or steep shoreline. Private-use hoisting equipment are in use as shown in figure 5-2. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 43 Figure 5-2. Example of a private hoisting platform 5.5.1 General Types Many types of cranes or derricks can be constructed from suitable local materials, or prefabricated steel units can be obtained from manufacturers. Heavy duty hoisting devices are usually powered by gasoline or electric motors; however, a geared hand winch is adequate to lift most light weight seaplanes. Other types of hoisting equipment used at such facilities include a jib crane, pillar crane, or guyed derrick. 5.5.2 Lift Capacity Hoisting equipment should be capable of lifting a gross load of three times the maximum weight of the seaplanes to be handled. Cable and band type slings will be necessary to lift seaplanes that are not equipped with hoisting eyes. Detailed information on the capacity, design, and installation of hoisting equipment may be obtained from manufacturers and engineering reference manuals. 5.6 MARINE RAILWAYS Where the shore is steep, an adaptable and desirable method to remove seaplanes from the water is a marine railway as illustrated by figure 4-6. The railway consists of a pair of light weight rails placed on a suitable structure that slopes into the water having a flanged-wheel platform that rides the rails. A suitable power unit must be provided to raise the platform from the water to the land. The platform will return by gravity if the rails slope is 8:1 or steeper. When the incline is less than 8:1, a reversible power winch rigged with an endless cable will return the platform to the water level. Emphasis is placed to use corrosive resistant materials as possible. Because marine railways are the transition point from water to land, the site should offer a minimum AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 44 width of 100 feet (30 m) of unobstructed water operating area (a turning basin) directly offshore from the rail platform in the direction from which approaches are normally made. 5.6.1 Marine Rail Supports and Foundation The most economical type of support for the rails consists of a continuous line of timber stringers directly parallel and under the rails which in turn are supported by transverse ties. In terms of a foundation, pile bents are used for water areas and at points on the shore where the soil will not support other types of foundations. If the soil at the shore end (rail head) of the marine rail is stable and subject to erosion, then either concrete piers or wooden sleepers may be used and at considerably less cost than pile bents. 5.6.2 Platform and Depth of Toe In all cases where a marine railway is used, the platform needs to extend far enough below the water to permit seaplanes to water taxi onto the platform with ease. The depth for the toe of the platform should be the same as that used for ramps usually some 4 feet. In all cases, depth dimension should be established at the low mean water level datum established for the locality. Iron or steel is usually used in fabricating the platform to provide sufficient weight to submerge the platform and keep the platform wheels from jumping the rails. The platform should be decked in the same manner used for ramps. A turntable installed on the platform is one convenient method of turning seaplanes to the desired direction of travel. A platform 20 feet (6 m) wide, 20 to 30 feet (6 to 9 m) long, and inclined at a slope of 8:1 will accommodate most seaplanes. 5.6.3 Catwalk For greater ease of operation, a catwalk can be placed adjacent to the side of the travelling platform or between the rails. Such an arrangement allows the public using this installation to reach the platform regardless of its location along the incline. 5.7 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND COMMON PUBLIC USE AREA 5.7.1 Multi-use Concept At small, simply seaplane bases, a hangar can be used for both seaplane services and for an office. At larger seaplane bases a separate administration building may be required to provide adequate space for the manager's office, passenger and pilot's lounge, display space, restaurant, snack bar, and observation deck. It is desirable to employ an uncomplicated, functional design that can adequately respond to the administrative needs of the facility. 5.7.2 Location The location should be in a prominent position on the site, readily accessible to seaplane arrivals as well as to customers and visitors from arriving from the surrounding community. Visibility of the water area from the administration building is another desirable feature. This condition is especially true when visibility of the water operating area from the administration building may be required for the control of seaplanes at locations where traffic in and out requires two-way radio communications. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 45 5.7.3 Outdoor Space It is desirable to reserve an outdoor space immediately adjacent to the administration building for public use and for recreational type purposes. This outdoor space may consist of a small lawn or paved terrace, preferably overlooking the shoreline and suitable for informal gatherings, outdoor picking tables. Any common public use area should be physically separated from the aeronautical activity area and/or areas used for fueling or storage of flammable materials. 5.8 PARKING AREAS Functionally, the parking area should be located for safe, convenient access to the various onshore and shoreline facilities. Hence, a parking area for cars, including handicapped spaces, and other transports must be made. One rule of thumb is to allow one car space for each based seaplane, one car space for each employee, plus a ratio of visitors’ cars commensurate with the judgment of local interest in the use of this public facility. Refer to the local building code to determine the area required for each car. The type of parking space lay-out will depend upon the space requirement and shape of the area available for the installation. It is highly recommended that any parking area not be located so that pedestrians must cross a public road to reach the facility proper. This creates an unnecessary hazard, particularly to unescorted children who might dash across the public highway. It is desirable that pedestrians not be required to walk a distance greater than 200 feet from the parking area or service road to reach facility buildings or the shoreline. All walks should be laid out for direct access to and from the facilities to be reached. 5.9 ROAD ACCESS Vehicular circulation must be provided for the public, service personnel, deliveries of gasoline, oil, fuel, and for refuse removal. These routes will influence walks and the interior road access. It is desirable that the interior road access to the seaplane base (administration building and public areas) be by an all-weather road. It is recommended that the seaplane base layout plan reflect the access road connection to a main highway or street. 5.9.1 Roadway Planning The access or entrance road should have adequate width, serve the anticipated traffic, and permit safe and easy circulation throughout the landside of the facility. 5.9.2 Service Roadways A public highway should never be part of the interior road system of a seaplane base. Vehicular through vehicles, deliveries of gasoline, oil, fuel, and refuse removal, a limited-use access service roadway is needed. These limited use access roadway should be marked and controlled by devices such as removable posts or chains located at the entrance to the areas of aeronautical activity. Also they serve to permit authorized access and provide circulation routes for emergencies. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 46 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 47 CHAPTER 6. SEAPLANE BASE IDENTIFICATION 6.1 SEAPLANE BASE IDENTIFICATION Seaplane base identification and lighting for the water operating area and shoreline should be provided for night operations. 6.2 LIGHTING WITHIN THE WATER OPERATING AREA A simple and inexpensive lightning method for a sea lane, taxi channel, etc., is to install a sequence of portable, battery-operated lights on top of buoys or other appropriate floatation devices. FAA-H – informs seaplane pilots that a night water landing should generally be considered only in an emergency. They can be extremely dangerous due to the difficulty of seeing objects in the water, judging surface conditions, and avoiding large waves or swell. See AC 91-69A, Seaplane Safety for 14 CFR Part 91 Operators, for preflight briefings, passenger floating devices, and other Federal requirements. 6.3 ROTATING BEACON It is recommended that the familiar rotating beacon for land airports be used to identify the seaplane landing area during periods of reduced visibility and, if lighted sea lanes are provided, for night operations. The emitted light is alternate white and yellow for water landing areas. A double white flash alternating with yellow identifies a military seaplane base. In water areas with congested water traffic, a radio activated strobe beacon may be used to alert mariners and other pilots that a seaplane will be arriving or departing within a short time. See AC 150/5345- 12, Specification for Airport and Heliport Beacons, for seaplane base beacon requirements. 6.4 WIND CONES As previously described by this advisory circular and per FAA-H, knowledge of the existing wind conditions for the water operating area is important to seaplane pilots. Hence, it is recommended that seaplane bases have a wind cone along or on the shore. See latest edition of AC 150/5345-27, Specification for Wind Cone Assemblies, for seaplane base wind cone requirements. 6.5 SHORELINE FLOODLIGHTS Floodlights or spotlights may be installed on the shore to illuminate aprons, floats, ramps, and piers or other installations deemed necessary. Care must be taken in locating and aiming floodlights to preclude affecting the vision of pilot's landing, taking off, water taxiing, or creating distracting reflections. 6.6 SEAPLANE BASE MARKING 6.6.1 Standard Air Marker The anchor symbol as shown in figure 6-1, similar to the designator found on aeronautical charts, is the standard air marker used to designate a seaplane base. Alternatively, numerals and/or other symbols may be used for such identification. The symbol is often painted on roofs or other flat surfaces that are easily visible from the air. Markings should be uncomplicated and easily maintained. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 48 LAYOUT PROCEDURE: ESTABLISH CENTER LINE OF MARKER (LINE "AB") 13 UNITS LONG. ESTABLISH POINTS "C", "D", "E", "F" AND "G" ALONG LINE "AB". LINE "DE" IS THREE ERECT PERPENDICULARS "DH" AND "FK" (SEE DETAIL A). PRODUCE LINE "HD" FOUR UNITS TO "J" AND LINE "KF" 4 UNITS TO "L". ESTABLISH POINTS "M', "N", "O", AND "P" ESTABLISHING THE ANCHOR SHAFT, TWO ESTABLISH POINTS "R" AND "S" BETWEEN "K" AND "H" & "U" BETWEEN "L" AND "J". CONNECT POINTS: "H" TO "S", "R" TO "K", " J" TO "U", "T" TO "L", "R" TO "G", "T" TO G", SCRIBE 1/2 UNIT AND 1 1/2 UNIT RADIUS CIRCLES ABOUT POINT "C" AND COMPLETE "B" TO "K", "B" TO "L", "S" TO "U", AND "H" TO "J". 9'-9" 13'-0" 16'-3" 19'-6" 22'-9" 26'-0" 32'-6" 39'-0" LENGTH 6'-0" 8'-0" 12'-0" 14'-0" 16'-0" 20'-0" 24'-0" WIDTH 10'-0" 0'-9" 1'-0" 1'-6" 1'-9" 2'-0" 2'-6" 3'-0" UNIT DIMENSION 1'-3" NOTE: ONE UNIT EQUALS 1/13TH OF OVERALL LENGTH. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. MARKER VARIOUS MARKER SIZES ESTABLISH POINT "E" ON LINE "AB", THREE UNITS FROM POINT "D". SWING AN ARC OF FIVE UNITS RADIUS FROM POINT "E" AND AN INTERSECTING ARC OF FOUR UNITS RADIUS FROM POINT "D" THEREBY ESTABLISHING POINT "H" AT THEIR INTERSECTION. LINE "HD" WILL THEN BE PERPENDICULAR SAME PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED AT POINTS, "F", "B" AND "K". SUGGESTED METHOD OF ERECTING PERPENDICULARS DETAIL A 4U 3U 5U D, F E, B H, K UNIT ("U") DIMENSIONS FOR SHAFT. UNITS WIDE. UNITS LONG. TO LINE "AB". 3U DIA1/2 U DIA 4 U 4 U 8 U 1 1/2 U 3 U 2 U 2 1/2 U 2 1/2 U 3 U J U T L H S R K M N O P A B F G 2 1/2 U 2 U E D C 13 U 8 U 13 U 1/2 U LIGHT BACKGROUND MARKER "B" DARK BACKGROUND MARKER "A" Note: Outside dimensions of markers are identical. Black border of marker “B” is 0.5 unit wide. One unit is 1/13 of the overall length. Figure 6-1. Seaplane Base Air Marker Proportions 6.6.2 Color Requirements The seaplane base marker shown in figure 6-1 shall be Aviation Yellow, No. 13538, and the border, when used to increase conspicuity by providing contrast with the background, e.g., a light colored concrete surface, shall be Aviation Black, Lusterless, No. 37038, as defined in Federal Color Standard No. 595. 6.6.3 Dimensions The recommended minimum overall dimensions for the seaplane base marker are 13 feet (4 m) in length by 8 feet (2.5 m) in width. The width of a black border, if used, is included within the overall recommended dimensions. Table 6-1 provides dimensional examples for proportionally larger markers over 13 feet (4 m) in length. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 49 Table 6-1. Proportioned Seaplane Base Marker (with or without a black border) Length Feet (meters) Width Feet (meters) Scale Multiplier Baselines = 13 feet (4 m) and 8.0 feet (2.5 m) 13.00 (4) 8.0 (2.5) 1.0 16.25 (5) 10.0 (3.0) 1.25 19.50 (6) 12.0 (3.5) 1.50 22.75 (7) 14.0 (4.0) 1.75 26.00 (8) 16.0 (5.0) 2.00 32.50 (10) 20.0 (6.0) 2.50 39.00 (12) 24.0 (7.5) 3.00 6.6.4 Procedure to Sketch a Seaplane Base Marker a. Establish center line AB, 13 units long. b. Establish points C, D, I, N along AB. c. Erect perpendiculars to AB: DF, DL, IG, IK. d. Connect points FG and KL. e. Establish lines NP, NS, BQ, BR. f. Connect points PQ and RS. g. Establish points E, M, H, J, 0, T. h. Connect points HO and JT. i. Scribe 1.5 unit radius circle about point C. j. Extend perpendiculars from points E and M to intersect with 1.5 unit circle. k. Scribe 0.5 unit radius circle about point C. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 50 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A 51 CHAPTER 7. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 INTRODUCTION Because of the variety of structures that have been used satisfactorily in various regions of the country, this section emphasizes general design considerations instead of specific plans and details. By following these recommendations, structures can be constructed that are tailored to individual need, finances, and local conditions. 7.2 PRESERVATION OF FACILITIES 7.2.1 Marine Borers If marine structures are to give long service, it is imperative that timbers be protected from attacks by various insects, fungi, and marine borers. The termite, which is the most common, inhabits many parts of the United States and Canada. It frequently enters the wood at or near the ground line. Fungi may develop any time there is a proper amount of air, warmth, food, and moisture. The discharge of various waste materials into bodies of water is conducive to the growth of wood-destroying fungi. The prevalence of marine borers is worldwide, and although they are usually found in salt or brackish waters, slight infestation may be found in rivers above the point of brackishness. No corrosive materials or untreated timbers should be used, in salt water. 7.2.2 Preservatives Where permitted by Federal, State, local jurisdictions, some of the more generally used preservatives in marina construction are urethane, epoxy, and shellac as acceptable sealers for all creosote treated wood, and should be used to prevent tracking creosote. The most effective type of wood treatment is the pressure process which forces the preservative into the wood. This pressure process may be either the full-cell or empty-cell treatment, which differ in the amount of preservative retained in the wood. 7.2.3 Piling Protection In areas where Teredo and pholad attack are expected or known and where Limnoria tripunctata attack is not prevalent, creosote or creosote solution treatment will provide adequate protection. In areas where Teredo and Limnoria tripunctata attack is expected or known and where pholad is not prevalent, either dual treatment or high retention of ACZA or CCA treatment will provide adequate protection. In areas where Limnoria tripunctata and pholad attack is expected or known, dual treatment provides the maximum protection. Proponents are urged to consult with local experts, engineers, the American Wood Preservers Institute, and the National Timber Piling Council, Inc., prior to using any treated lumber or piling on a project. 7.2.4 Hinged Connections Special provisions must be made so that attachment booms and gangways can adjust to fluctuations in water level. One method is to install a fixed hinge at the shoreline in combination with another hinge on the float or runners for the gangway to slide on as the water level changes. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 52 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix A A-1 APPENDIX A. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROGRAMS The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is charged with maintaining navigable waterways. This is accomplished by the U.S. Army Corps' permit program whose purpose is to avoid obstructions in navigable waters. The U.S. Army Corps' regulatory program concerns the integrity of navigation channels and the quality of the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. A.1 The proponent of a seaplane base located on navigable water should contact the Office of the District Engineer who has jurisdiction over the area where the seaplane activity will take place or where a structure will be built. This preliminary inquiry will save time in applying for a Department of the Army permit. A.2 Pamphlet EP 1145-2-1, May 1985, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Program, Applicant Information, provides basic and general information of a nontechnical nature designed to assist the proponent in applying for a Corps of Engineers' permit. Title 33 CFR parts 320 through 330, cites the U.S. Army Corps' permit program. A.3 Figures A-1 through A-3 contain forms and other information required to apply for a Department of the Army permit. A.4 The following link may be used to locate the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer Division and Districts offices for regulatory information: http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/RegulatoryCon tacts.aspx. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix A A-2 Figure A-1. Application for a Department of the Army Permit - page one 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix A A-3 Figure A-2. Application for a Department of the U.S. Army Corps Permit – page two AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix A A-4 A.5 Part 1: Instructions for Preparing a Department of the Army Permit Application Blocks 1 through 4. To be completed by Corps of Engineers. Block 5. Applicant’s Name. Enter the name and the E-mail address of the responsible party or parties. If the responsible party is an agency, company, corporation, or other organization, indicate the name of the organization and responsible officer and title. If more than one party is associated with the application, please attach a sheet with the necessary information marked Block 5. Block 6. Address of Applicant. Please provide the full address of the party or parties responsible for the application. If more space is needed, attach an extra sheet of paper marked Block 6. Block 7. Applicant Telephone Number(s). Please provide the number where you can usually be reached during normal business hours. Blocks 8 through 11. To be completed, if you choose to have an agent. Block 8. Authorized Agent’s Name and Title. Indicate name of individual or agency, designated by you, to represent you in this process. An agent can be an attorney, builder, contractor, engineer, or any other person or organization. Note: An agent is not required. Blocks 9 and 10. Agent’s Address and Telephone Number. Please provide the complete mailing address of the agent, along with the telephone number where he / she can be reached during normal business hours. Block 11. Statement of Authorization. To be completed by applicant, if an agent is to be employed. Block 12. Proposed Project Name or Title. Please provide name identifying the proposed project, e.g., Landmark Plaza, Burned Hills Subdivision, or Edsall Commercial Center. Block 13. Name of Waterbody. Please provide the name of any stream, lake, marsh, or other waterway to be directly impacted by the activity. If it is a minor (no name) stream, identify the waterbody the minor stream enters. Block 14. Proposed Project Street Address. If the proposed project is located at a site having a street address (not a box number), please enter it here. Block 15. Location of Proposed Project. Enter the latitude and longitude of where the proposed project is located. If more space is required, please attach a sheet with the necessary information marked Block 15. Block 16. Other Location Descriptions. If available, provide the Tax Parcel Identification number of the site, Section, Township, and Range of the site (if known), and / or local Municipality that the site is located in. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix A A-5 Block 17. Directions to the Site. Provide directions to the site from a known location or landmark. Include highway and street numbers as well as names. Also provide distances from known locations and any other information that would assist in locating the site. You may also provide description of the proposed project location, such as lot numbers, tract numbers, or you may choose to locate the proposed project site from a known point (such as the right descending bank of Smith Creek, one mile downstream from the Highway 14 bridge). If a large river or stream, include the river mile of the proposed project site if known. Block 18. Nature of Activity. Describe the overall activity or project. Give appropriate dimensions of structures such as wing walls, dikes (identify the materials to be used in construction, as well as the methods by which the work is to be done), or excavations (length, width, and height). Indicate whether discharge of dredged or fill material is involved. Also, identify any structure to be constructed on a fill, piles, or float-supported platforms. The written descriptions and illustrations are an important part of the application. Please describe, in detail, what you wish to do. If more space is needed, attach an extra sheet of paper marked Block 18. Block 19. Proposed Project Purpose. Describe the purpose and need for the proposed project. What will it be used for and why? Also include a brief description of any related activities to be developed as the result of the proposed project. Give the approximate dates you plan to both begin and complete all work. Block 20. Reasons for Discharge. If the activity involves the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into a wetland or other waterbody, including the temporary placement of material, explain the specific purpose of the placement of the material (such as erosion control). Block 21. Types of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards. Describe the material to be discharged and amount of each material to be discharged within Corps jurisdiction. Please be sure this description will agree with your illustrations. Discharge material includes: rock, sand, clay, concrete, etc. Block 22. Surface Areas of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled. Describe the area to be filled at each location. Specifically identify the surface areas, or part thereof, to be filled. Also include the means by which the discharge is to be done (backhoe, dragline, etc.). If dredged material is to be discharged on an upland site, identify the site and the steps to be taken (if necessary) to prevent runoff from the dredged material back into a waterbody. If more space is needed, attach an extra sheet of paper marked Block 22. Block 23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation. Provide a brief explanation describing how impacts to waters of the United States are being avoided and minimized on the project site. Also provide a brief description of how impacts to waters of the United States will be compensated for, or a brief statement explaining why compensatory mitigation should not be required for those impacts. Block 24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Provide any background on any part of the proposed project already completed. Describe the area already developed, structures completed, any dredged or fill material already discharged, the type of material, volume in cubic AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix A A-6 yards, acres filled, if a wetland or other waterbody (in acres or square feet). If the work was done under an existing Corps permit, identity the authorization, if possible. Block 25. Names and Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Project Site. List complete names and full mailing addresses of the adjacent property owners (public and private) lessees, etc., whose property adjoins the waterbody or aquatic site where the work is being proposed so that they may be notified of the proposed activity (usually by public notice). If more space is needed, attach an extra sheet of paper marked Block 24. Information regarding adjacent landowners is usually available through the office of the tax assessor in the county or counties where the project is to be developed. Block 26. Information about Approvals or Denials by Other Agencies. You may need the approval of other federal, state, or local agencies for your project. Identify any applications you have submitted and the status, if any (approved or denied) of each application. You need not have obtained all other permits before applying for a Corps permit. Block 27. Signature of Applicant or Agent. The application must be signed by the owner or other authorized party (agent). This signature shall be an affirmation that the party applying for the permit possesses the requisite property rights to undertake the activity applied for (including compliance with special conditions, mitigation, etc.). A.6 Part 2: Drawings and Illustrations A.6.1 General Information. Three types of illustrations are needed to properly depict the work to be undertaken. These illustrations or drawings are identified as a Vicinity Map, a Plan View or a Typical Cross-Section Map. Identify each illustration with a figure or attachment number. Please submit one original, or good quality copy, of all drawings on 8½ x11 inch plain white paper (electronic media may be substituted). Use the fewest number of sheets necessary for your drawings or illustrations. Each illustration should identify the project, the applicant, and the type of illustration (vicinity map, plan view, or cross-section). While illustrations need not be professional (many small, private project illustrations are prepared by hand), they should be clear, accurate, and contain all necessary information. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix A A-7 Figure A-3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Division boundaries AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix A A-8 This page intentionally left blank. 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix B B-1 APPENDIX B. U.S. COAST GUARD PROGRAMS The U.S. Coast Guard is charged with marking navigable waterways. For the purpose of this advisory circular, "aids to navigation" refers to nautical application rather than to the aeronautical connotation. B.1 The proponent of a water operating area located on navigable waters should contact the Commander of the U.S. Coast Guard District which has jurisdiction over the area where the water operating area be developed. B.2 If the proponent decides that markers are required, then these markers are classified as private aids to navigation. The rules, regulations, and procedures that pertain to private aids to navigation are set forth in Title 33 CFR part 66. B.3 The U.S. Coast Guard requires that the application show evidence of a permit having been issued by the Corps of Engineers prior to completing CG-2554 (item 6 of the form). B.4 Figures B-1 through B-4 contain instructions for completing the application form as well as a district map of the U.S. Coast Guard District Commanders. B.5 The following link may be used to locate the United States Coast Guard Districts offices: http://www.uscg.mil/top/units/. AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix B B-2 Figure B-1. Federal regulations Concerning Private Aids to Navigation, 33 CFR Part 66 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix B B-3 Figure B-2. Private Aids to Navigation Application AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix B B-4 Figure B-3. Private Aids to Navigation Application - continued 8/6/2013 AC 150/5395-1A Appendix B B-5 Figure B-4. U.S. Coast Guard Districts AC 150/5395-1A 8/6/2013 Appendix B B-6 This page intentionally left blank.