Backup Documents 09/05/2002 WBOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
WORKSHOP MEETING
SEPTEMBER 5, 2002
Landscape Workshop
Collier County Board of Commissioners
AGENDA
2.
3.
4.
Brief Historical Perspective
Where are we now?
Policy Alternatives - Potential Policies for Discussion
Public Comment on Policy Alternatives
Members of the public and members of several of the
Beautification MSTU Advisory Committees have indicated an
interest to staff in addressing the Board on policy issues
Policy Discussion for Future Beautification/Enhancement Projects
Recently Proposed Landscaping Enhancement Projects
Public Comment on Proposed Projects
Members of the public and members of several of the
Beautification MSTU Advisory Committees have indicated an
interest to staffin addressing the Board on specific projects of local
interest
8. Wrap Up
The Workshop is to be held at the Board of County Commissioners Board Room. September
5, 2002, 2:00pm --4:30pm. ,
NOTICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
Thursday, September 5, 2002
1:00 P.M.
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
will hold a Landscape Workshop on THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2002 at 1:00
P.M., in the Board of County Commissioners Boardroom, at the Collier County
Government Complex, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida.
The meeting is open to the public.
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of
the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
James N. Coletta, Chairman
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By:/s/Maureen Kenyon
Deputy Clerk
August 7, 2002
Ms. Pam Perrell
Naples Daily News
1075 Central Avenue
Naples, Florida 34102
Re: BCC LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
Dear Pam:
Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, August 25,
2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate,
together with charges involved to this office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teri Michaels,
Deputy Clerk
P.O./Account # 200213
Teri Michaels
To:
Subject:
Th(Inks P(~m ....
paperrell@naplesnews.com
BCC LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
BCC LANDSCAPE
NKSHP 9-5-02.doc..
BCC LANDSCAPE
NKSHP-9-5-02.doc..
Teri Michaels
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
System Administrator [postmaster@naplesnews.com]
Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:14 AM
Ted Michaels
Delivered: BCC LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
BCC LANDSCAPE
WORKSHOP
~B¢C LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP>> Your message
To: ' paperrell~naplesnews.com'
Subject: BCC LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
Sent: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:14:08 -0400
was delivered to the following recipient(s):
Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 7 Aug ?002 :[1:13:48 -0400
NapLes Daily News
NapLes/ FL 34102
Affidavit of Publication NapLes Daily News
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CHERI LEFARA
PO BOX 413016
NAPLES FL 34101-3016
REFERENCE: 001230 200213
58510550 NOTICE OF BOARD OF C
State of FLorida
County of Collier
Before the undersigned authority, personally
appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves
as Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples
Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples,
in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached
copy of advertising was published in said
newspaper on dates Listed.
Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily
News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said
Collier County, FLorida, and that the said
newspaper has heretofore been continuously
published in said Collier County, FLorida, each
day and has been entered as second class-mail
matter at the post office in Naples, in said
Collier County, FLorida, for a period of I year
next preceding the first publication of the
attached copy of advertisement; and affiant
further says that she has neither paid nor
promised any person, firm or corporation any
discount, rebate, commission or refund for the
purpose of securing this advertisement for
pubLiction in the said newspaper.
PUBLISHED ON: 08/25
AD SPACE: 62.000 INCH
FILEO ON: 08/26/02
NOTICE OF
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
LANDSCAPE WORKSHOP
Notice Is hereby given that the Collier Count~ Board
of County Commissioners will _hq.l.d__~_ L.a~d~s^c.ope~J
Workshop on THURSDAY, SEPTEMI~t=I< ~,. zyuz m I
1.~ P.M., In the Bo~rd ~f
Boorclr~om, et the Collier .C~u...nty .c, ov._e.r_n_.~m~? ~3rn- I
plex, 3301 E~rt Tamlaml Trail, Naples, e-mr~uu. I
The meeting Is al)mn to the public. I
I Board will nee~ a re<ora o~'
/ lng fl~ereto, end therefore may ~ .......
/vorboflm record of the preceemngs. Is . .msme,
/record Includes the ~sk~¥ ana evlaence
[ ~hlch the a~al Is ~ I~ .
/ BOA~D OF COUNTY COM~ISSlO~I=R8
/ COLLI~:R COUNTY, FlOrIDA
| James N. ¢o1~, Cl'~lrman
| D~IOHT E. ~tOCK, CI_E~K
/BY:/s/JcaJreen Kenyon
/ Deoutv Clerk
/ August 2~ NO.
Signature of Affiant
Sworn to and Subscribed bef~'~e t y
Personally known by fae
~ ,:,~ ,:, E:: ;~i '~$ ':. ,: ~,:::r~'n:~ '~ ~ 2005
Collier County
Board of County Commissioners
Roadway Landscaping
Workshop
Where are we ...
Where do we want to go ???
Collier County
StreetScape Master Plan
Adopted by the Board in 1997 and
incorporated into the LDC
The Plan called for an additional 120 miles
of roadway landscaping in a 15-year
timeframe
The Plan was not funded although several
projects have been constructed on an Ad
Hoc basis
Collier County
Landscaping Gmdel nes
Committee formed in 1998 to develop
Guidelines by then County Manager Bob
Fernandez
The Team was tasked to:
· api '
Review existing landsc ng ~n R/W
Develop recommended plant list
Develop standardized maintenance
specifications
4
Where we are now:
36 miles of landscaped roadways ~
Investment in excess of $10 million
(including agreements)
Annual maintenance cost of about $2
million ~ o~ ~,-~
Current requests in excess of $2 million
capital and about $1 million maintenance
for new landscaping initiatives
Landscaped Roadway Segments
Ex~stmg Lan.dscaped .Roadway
Fundmg M amx
-CAPITAL MAINT. "EST. AMT.
NI
CoNSTR- CoNSTR- FUI~i3 coST
FUND cOST
32.9
Total:
383
Maintenance Considerations
l
l
l
Roadway capacity recapture program
Median modifications require removal & refurbishment
of plant materials and irrigation. ~,o~- ~ ~ ~. ~oo~
Plant life-cycle issues
Typical life-cycle for most commonly used plant
materials varies from 7-12 years except for larger
trees. ~o ._ Il,if'5 . c~c*+ e~mo_~l~c' ~ Cax:,A c~c~A-~
Future cost considerations
Annual budget for Fund 111 needs to reflect provision
for refurbishment due to crashes, age, roadway
modifications, etc. (estimated at about $250,000)
Beautification MSTUs
Current Operatin.q Parameters
Millage Ad Valorum Operating Annual Maintenance Cost
Fund MSTU Cap Rate Revenue Budget Length MSTU MSTD TOTAL
1601Bayshore* 3 2 537,700 815,300 1.0 $ 230,000 $ 40,000 $ 27,000
1361Golden Gate 0.5 0.5 269,400 212,200 5.2 $ 140,000 $ 460,000 $ 600,000
156 Immokalee** I 1 280,000 375,200 1.7 $ 50,000 $ 205,000 $ 255,000
152 Lely 2 2 171,700 127,100 1.31 $ 95,000 $ $ 95,000
161 Livincjston* 2 0.75 640,200 215,000! 3.0' $ - $ $ -
150 Radio Road 0.5 0.5 392,400 269,600 3.0 $ 214,000 $ 56,700 $ 270,700
146 Vanderbilt* 0.5 0.5 917,300 274,100 1.3 $ 83,000 $ $ 83,000
Grand Total: $ 1,330,700
Notes:
Annual Maintenance Costs include water, electriC, mulch, chemicals, etc.)
* includes payback of advances
** includes reserve for capital improvements
10
Landscape
Funding Considerations
Capital costs
Operating and maintenance costs
Level of landscaping (more to come)~
Roadway classification ~o ~-~-,o~
Gateway - ~~ :~ ~ ~~~.
Arterial segment -
Collector segment
Local .street
II
Landscape Funding Matrix
Level
Base level
Urban/
Rural
Add-ons
Trees
Planting and
Irrigation
TBD
Maintenance
Shrubs, Shrubs,
groundcov Trees groundcov
er, added er, added
trees trees
N/A
TBD
N/A
Supervision
Trees
Shrubs,
groundcov
er, added
trees
County
N/A
TBD Private TBD Private County County
Private
Private TBD
Enhanced TBD
County
County
12
Typical Base Level
lier Coun,ty Style...)
13
Landscape Funding Matrix
Level
Base level
Urban/
Rural
Add-ons
Enhanced
Planting and
Irrigation
Trees
Maintenance
TBD
Shrubs, Shrubs,
groundcov Trees groundcov
er, added er, added
trees trees
N/A TBD N/A
Supervision
Trees
Shrubs,
groundcov
er, added
trees
County
N/A
TBD Private TBD Private County County
TBD
Private TBD Private County
County
14
Typical Add-on Level
15
Landscape Funding Matrix
Level
Planting and
Irrigation
Maintenance
Supervision
Trees
Shrubs,
groundcover,
added trees
Trees
Shrubs,
groundcover,
added trees
Trees
Shrubs,
groundcover,
added trees
Base level
Urban/
Rural
Add-ons
TBD
TBD
N/A
Private
TBD
TBD
N/A
Private
County
County
N/A
County
Enhanced
TBD
Private
TBD
Private
County
County
16
Typical Enhanced Level
f7
Suggested Policies
for D scuss on
Fund future landscape projects outside of County budget
Endorse Public/Private Partnerships (with a cap on Public
costs) '
Form an MSTU for the Urban Services Area (eXclude
existing MSTUs) c_~, ~ ~.~ l[ o~-
Form an MSTU for the Urban Services Area (include
existing MSTUs)
Review/Fund projects on a case-by-case basis''~ ~'~
Combination of above and/or other policies not listed
18
Policy Statement and Issues
l
Fund future landscape projects outside of County
budget
Current Maintenance costs will continue and escalate
with the Consumer Price Index ~c~'~
No added drain on limited capital and operating
funds
Need assurance that an ongoing entity will provide
perpetual maintenance
Lowest cost alternative
Potential for added staff to monitor compliance with
agreements
19
Policy Statement and Issues (con't.)
l
Endorse Public/Private
on Public costs
Partnerships (with a cap
Annual spending cap would require that projects be
considered on a "first come, first served" basis
Spending may be limited to capital or maintenance or
a portion to both
Need to establish criteria to determine which projects
are considered each year
2O
Policy Statement and Issues (con't.)
· Form an MSTU for the ·
Urban Services Area
(exclude existing MSTUs)
Costs are apportioned
among a portion of Urban
Services Area landowners
~ Existing MSTUs continue
to operate and maintain
their improvements
Costs of new projects
disproportionately spread
among remainder of
Urban Services Area
landowners
Form an MSTU for the
Urban Services Area
(include existing MSTUs)
Costs are apportioned
among all Urban Services
Area landowners
Existing MSTUs may
continue to operate and
maintain their
improvements or may
disband in favor of the
overall district
Continuation of existing
MSTUs would result in
double taxation
21
Urban Area MSTU
Assessed Value Millage Approximate
Within MSTU Rate Revenue
1.00: $17,533,616
0,50 $ 8,766,808
$17,533,616,000 0,25 $ 4,383,404
0,10 $ 1,753,362
0.05 $ 876,681
Assessed
Cost at Various Millage Rates
Value
~ 1.00 0.500.250.100.05
$ 100,000 $ '~00 $ 50$ 25$ ~0$ 5
$ 250,000 $ 250$125$ 63$ 25$ 13
$ 500,000 $ 500$250$'125 $ 50$ 25
$1,000,000 $~,000 $500$250$'~00 $ 50
22
Policy Statement and Issues (con't.)
I
Review and fund projects
on a case-by-case basis
This is the current policy
There is no cap or criteria for determining which
projects should be funded
There are a myriad of agreements in place with little
in common regarding term, cost-sharing or scope of
responsibilities
25
Policy Statement and Issues (con't.)
l
Combination of above and/or other policies not
li,sted
New ideas? '-~-~ ~= ~-o~ o~'~*t
Difficult decisions!
"Where do you want to go?"
26
Public Comment
on Policy Alternatives
Members of the public and of various
Advisory Committees would like to
li y'
comment onpo c ~ssues...
· · · ·
Discussion of Alternative Policies
Before you review specific new
requests, you need to determine how
you will evaluate them...
Policy vs. Project
All projects must go through the "sieve'''~,~~''~`t
What falls out, falls out
What stays in is eligible
Ehg~ble projects get prioritized-~=,,-.
Priorities get funded based on available
funding -~ ~:~:~°~ ~' ~0'~'~ ~ ~=~='
Non-funded projects may be revisited in
the future _
3O
Recent
Landscape Project Requests
1. Airport Road fronting Tall Pines Subdivision
2. Vineyards Development Company
3. US 41 North Pelican Bay frontage
4. Livingston Road from GGPkwy. to Pine Ridge Road
5. GGPkwy/I-75 Interchange Area
6. Pine Ridge Road from Airport Road to 1-75
7. Devonshire Boulevard
31
Landscape Enhancement Requests
Location
Airport Road
Vineyards
US 41 North
Livingston Road
GG Interchange
Pine Ridge Road
Devonshire Blvd.
Nature of Request
Mask pedestrian rail
Refurbish existing landscaping
Roadway landscaping
Roadway landscaping (MSTU)
Aesthetic enhancements
Roadway landscaping
Refurbish and maintain
32
Cost Considerations for Requested
Landscape Enhancements
Annual
Capital Maintenance
$ 35,000 $ 15,000
$ 35,000 $. 50,000
$144,000 $105,000
$600,000 $300,000
$495,000 $200,000
$800,000 $200,000
$ 85,000 $ 40,000
Totals: $2,109,000 $870,000
Location
Airport Road
Vineyards
US 41 North
Livingston Road
Interchange
Pine Ridge Road
Devonshire Blvd.
3.3
Public Comment
·
on Specific ProJects
Members of the public and of various
Advisory Committees would like to
comment on specific projects of local
interest...
Next Steps...
Staff preparation of an Executive Summary
recapping today's policy decisions
Staff review of landscaping proposals to
provide recommendations to the Board
Preparation of Executive Summaries for
each proposal gassing through the "sieve"
36
Thank you
· ·
for your t me and attention.
We will return to the Board with an
Executive Summary providing an
action plan for the work begun here
today.